2007, 07-23 Special Joint BOCC MeetingFILE COPY
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
ADEN-DA
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING/STUDY SESSION
Spokane Valley City Council/Spokane County Commissioners
Monday, July 23, 2007
2:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Council Chambers, Spokane Valley City Hall
11707 E Sprague Avenue
DISCUSSION AGENDA ITEMS INCLUDE (but are not limited to):
1) Joint Planning Agreements
2) Potential Regional Ballot Issues
3) Wastewater Treatment Facility Governance
4) Regional Animal Control
5) Other Topics
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, no public comments will be taken at this meeting. However, Council
always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings
held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action* on any item listed or
subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or
make a collective positive or negative decision.
NOTICE Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,
hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that
arrangements may be made.
July 23, 2007 Joint Meeting, Council & Board of County Commissioners
r
GENDA ITEM i71
Sp6koane A
Valley °
11707 E. Sprague Ave. • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA 99206
(509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane Valley City Council
FROM: -Dave Mercier Gity-Manager
DATE: July :19, 2007
RE: INTERLOCAL PL,ANITWNG AGREEMENT
A draft of the new interlocal joint planning agreement between Spokane County
and the City of Spokane Valley is attached for your review.
Enc.
Jnl\' 12. 2007 DFLaFT
iI~sTER1 OCAL AGREEi\fE✓NT RFG A.RDI., G JOINT PLA.NNI NIG BET\\t7EBN
SPOKANE COL~iTY Al\'D
THE CITY OF SPOKANE
This 1.areement is entered 4t , by.Spokanc Count;, hereinafter reterr~-d to as "County-"and the City, of ~o1ane , hereinafter referred to "Ciro'. io rt ht
referred to along, with ±L:• : unto as the'Tartles°.
Whereas, a Goal of the State Growth Management Act is to ensure coordination between
communities and jurisdictions, including special purpose districts to reconcile conflicts,
v T .
and
Whereas, RCW 36.70A110 sets forth certain requirements for County-widgp. lIm ring
.olicies, including that county-xvide planning policies shall address policies for joint
county and city planning within urban growth areas, and
Where:Is The Coun ryvide Manning ~7oiicies.for Spokane County adopted pursuant to
z
RCW 36.70A.210 contain policies for a joint planning process intended to resolve issues
regarding bow zoning, subdivision and outer land use approvals in designated joint
planning areas will be coordinated, and that such joint planning may be accomplished
pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered into betsxen and/or among jurisdictions
Formatted: Font- Mm7 es New Raman
Deleted: Exhibit " CII t
Deleted: DRAIr r LNTERLOCAI.
AGREUlL\'r j
Delcbed: e
Deleted: Lit,
F leted: on the _ day of
06
Deleted: iTowa
Deleted: to
Deleted: as
Deleted: special
Deleted:
Deleted: P
Dc{eted: P
Deleted: P
_ and/or special pu pose districts, and
Whereas, the Parties are desirous of resolving how zoning. subdivision and other land
use approvals in the Moran/Glenrose UGA/JPA and adjoining orooem- within the City of
Snokane will be coordinated, and
Whereas, the Parties Arish to separate; without prejudice to either Party, the issue of
potential annexation,of the Moran/Ue.nrose (JGAiJPA and the legal authoriand right to
pursue or oppose such annexation, from tlti greement
Now, therefore be it Resolved, towards addressing how zoning; subdivision and other
land use approvals for joint planning ,i41 be coordinated, to ensure that transportation
capacity for development meets concurrency requirements and that consistent
development standards are used, the Parties agree to cooperative joint planning in time
Moran/Glenrose UGA/JPA and adjoining property located within the City of Spokane,
pursuant to the follov6ng terms and conditions:
1. Legal basis: This ,geement is entered into pursuant to RCW 36.7011.010; a20(3);
210 (3) (a), (b), (d), and (f); RCW 39..4; Countywide Planning Policies For Spokane
County (Planning Policies) Topic 2, Overview of Growth ;Management Act (GIvf.A)
Requirements; Topic 2, Policies (1) and (2); Topic S Transportation, Overview of
Growth Management (GAliA) Requirements; and Glossary Courityxvide Planning
Policy Terms, Joint Planning Areas;,
Deleted: dtsipw:r; jozm plaguing
Wzas
Deleted: s
Deleted: :
Deleted:
Deleted: and d= r.> =Sw of the &
l Deleted: d-sgeted mars
Deleted: a
Deleted: tae Sag =t C=
q2frhansjva Plan. and tha
Compr_hens:ve Alan pf the Cityf wwn of
2. Intent: It is the intent of the Parties:
#o nroNzde for cooed n„a,?ed pl ni►ino for transportation and development standards in
tho-,;,c consisting tfthe (1) h4oran/Glenrose UGa/JPA to "I~G~IJPA"1 and
(2) that area located in the City of SDokane adjacent to the UGAQPA (the "Cit.!
Prop°1-tv"1 lointl~, referred to as the Joint Planning Areas as defined in this
N ~EerRent,
to ensure that ti- nsportation improvements necessary._to.,Mitigate, transportation
impacts resulting from development in the Joint Planning Areas are identified and
constructed concurrent with the development and/or that adequate funding is secured
to finance constnlction of such transportation improvements concurrent with
development, as required by RCW, 6.70A.070(6)tbl, and
o ensure that development standards applied within the, Joint Pla -ninas relating ,
f3) t
to allowable land uses; densities, streets, sidewalks; curbing. drainage and utilities are
compatible„
The Parties desire to jointly develop and implement development regulations,
procedures and standards related to the review and approval of projects 'xithin the
Joipt Planning Areas The Parties also desire to jointly establish and implement
consistent development lea lations and procedures governing the provision of all
public facilities within said joint Planning Areas. 7'he Parties agree to commit
sufficient staff to draft and finalize these specific agreements in a timely manner. ,
Deleted: !
Deleted: for towdimwrod
Deleted: tbt
Deleted: 1UGA,
Deleted: a
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 36.70A. H D.D70(6)(b)
Deleted:
Deleted: UGA
Deleted:
Deleted: and c=sistmn with tbt Ci:y's
cannrh:rawe plan and deveto, na;tt
standards
Deleted: UCA rs dcfm.-d in t:-:s
8W.-=e¢t
Deleted: UGA
Deleted: (M=tiom.x th- CTED
a-Cwth 1✓,ac=ag-neat S.-Mets QM'd
coi6d be inserted hue.)
Deleted: a
i. Applicability: The cement shall apply to de~,elopment proposals within &C
Moran/G)enrose UGA/JPA, as identified in Exhibit _ `A" hereto ?e "UG AIJPA:', a~
well as that area located within the Cin; of Spokane identified in Exhibit '-A" ?s_
iiv Property' jointly referred to within this Agreement as the "Joint Planning
Areas".
Deleted: urbmt gowtb mm= aai_b a e
oo=*guous to the CLy's :orpomc
bottodmies,
DeFcted:(
Deleted: )
Deleted: a
4. Projects affected: This Bement applies to new deveH . ...t proposals in the~lo t Deleted: UGA
Planning Areas that are subject to the Notice of Application requirements of RCW
36.7013 as adopted by the County for prODeriv in the UGA/JP.A Or Cite for property in'
the City Pro elm,. incluain proposals subject to the State Environmental Policy Act
(the "Development Proposal(sY-*).
Notice of Application, Notice of Hearing and Notice of Decision required by RCW
36.70B and any environmental checklist, EIS or other environmental document
required pursuant to RCW 43.21C E pr Development Pro Sa s in the Joint Pl 113
,Areas shall be provided to each party by the other Da ' in a timely manner and in
accordance with applicable regulations. The Parties further agree they shall provide
each outer at least 7 days notice of any technical review meeting(s) ~vi*h reUard to a
Develo ment Proposai-and are allowed and encoured to attend any buildin- Dermit
M
nreconstruction conference and/or technical review n;eetines. Such notice shall be in
the form of standard notice for such technical review ineeting given. by the either
paTe`~! .
7"he Parties shall oo fer on Develo merit Proposals outlined above prior to
Deleted: jmisd aion
Deleted: Parties
Deleted: ,
Deleted: , building permit
;retwsrucvon canfut-re andfor land
us_ predeve]opmenr m tctly Czl rn~iew
aixigz^5.
Deleted: caafareacerlm=66V
Deleted: jw-isdietien
Deleted: a 'ilx
Deleted: tamult (nIwify)
Delete!: p
issuance of any final INNS, 1viDNS or staff report to the Hearing Examiner in
an auempt to reach a consensus positionlrecormnendation. for SEPA
document;, the jurisdiction having lead agency status sball include the
consensuslcollective recommendation and any mitigating conditions, or their
individual recommendations and any midgating conditions if unable to reach
consensus, as applicable; for projects proceeding to public hearing, both
-Parties shall include the consensus recommendation in their respective staff
report/recommended conditions of approval to the Hearing Examiner or other
appropriate hearing body, or, if unable to agree, their respective
recommendations.
d. Transportation: The Parties recogni7x that development activity within their
Deleted: will
respective jurisdictions _ may cause a7rtsportation impacts and may impact
Deleted: aeig6bcrzng
transportation levels of service in neighboring iurisdictions. To ensure proper
identification and mitigation of development related transportation impacts, the
Parties agree that:
Deleted: rcTtire J
a. Unless otherwise inconsistent with law, either of the Parties may reouest_
Deleted: A Alysis
preparation of a Traffic Impact 5.--'d,X ('T1S~ quantifying the impact, of any„_..• Deleted:A
. DCk,` .new dcvcicpCrciii
Development Zroao§al within the Joint Planning Areas, The~eriningloev TlS is Deleted: ,,;t;n
Deleted: UGA
defined in Section 1.30 f the Spokane County Road and Drainage Standards. a
copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B." The Parties understand flat the
termirlQlogv TIS may range fi in an in delzh analvsis of the site (Development
Proposal) generated levels-of-service to a cursory review of safety issues. In the
e. ent d-,e Party Arithin whose iurisdiction dhe DeyeloRn'ent Proposal is DTOt22se
determines to prepare a TIL the other Dai y shall have an opportunity. to
paricim.te i;i_rl,e,sco inQ used to determine the depth of analysis ,
b. In approving and/or making recommendations regardingevelopn;ent
Zroposals, each of the Parties shall require (or rccolnmend, as the case may be.~
construction of the transportation improvements necessary to mitigate
transportation impact identified in the T15 concurrent with development as
required by RCW 36.70A.070(6 and~or the dedication of such land or
payment of money in lieu thereof that is necessary to mitigate such impacts to the
jurisdiction whose transportation system is thereby impacted. Any such fees shall
be held and encumbered as provided in RCW 82.02.020.
Deleted: d
c. For pevelopment Y'Toposis in the Joint Planning as where construction of Deleted: luojxs
I Deleted: UGA
improvements necessary to mitigate identified direct transportation impacts does
Deleted: projrt ~'ncxa;:ncw
not take place concurrent with the Development Proposal, the Parties shall jointly. .
establish a uniform method for quantifying appropriate financial contributions
anionsz the City. County and sponsor/develape.r of the Development Proposal for
Deleted: 1cojcct
improvements to be made within 6 years of, th- approy ! of the Developent
Pro ca for identified direct transportation impacts. The Parties recognize that
Deleted: a
to implement this AareFl nt some modification of existing relations may be ,
required and agree to make such modifications in a timely manner consi~
any aoolicable late after establishment of a unifonn and mutually agreed upon
1 Deleted: 10:.ach such Casa, both Panics
method for quantifying appropriate financial contributions.
Deleted: reta:amsnd
d. The Parties fouler agree to jointly identify e~ elopment proposals that Deleted: denial of w-,yd
fail to comply with the concurrency stanndards of -either party.
_ Deleted: r
d
e. Th[- Parties further agree to consider incorporati g the findings an
recommendations on concurrency being prepared by the Spokane Regional
Deleted: ME= PL-ming
Transportation Council (SRTC) into this -Agreement, to the extent agreed to
. Deleted: the proj:.^t is on:aplet:c
by the Parries, by formal amendment at sucb time that SRTC's concurrence
re.eulations are finalized.
Deleted: UOA
Development Standards: The Parties recognize that development in the J oult
Planning.Ar errs without common development resulations could frustrate the purpose
Deleted: a
and intent of this Agreement;, Deleted: w6 a:- prmzdu=
. . es ahGsha9
a. The Parties agree to assign the necessary staff to review applicable
development reguiations, including but not limited to zoning designations, PUD
standards, landscaping, signage, subdivision, road and street standards, bicycle.
paths, jogging lanes, trail systems application review procedures and stomi-water
drainage requirements. Differences shall be identified and a consensus or
eompa_tible standard recommended, after which mutual recommendations will be
processed as an amendment to each Parties' development regulations in a lawful
manner towards the end of developing uniformity in said development standards.
Such review should include representatives from the private sector who may be
impacted by any such amendments. The process to identify individual
Deleted: a
jurisdiction differences shall commence upon signing of this Agr,eement, with a
goal of completing the identification of differences within six 6I months of
Deleted: true CFED 07rmx
A'Ea-j..=m serwa:s Groat =06 be
signing. Recommendation for consensus standards shall follow. b_ T}ie Parties m..avoaedh=r-)J
agree to confer on the necessity for and/or the location of any connector
l Deleted: propos:d . drvdopaa~;
streets and/or the classification of any streets -vtnthin or adjacent to a,
Deleted: os ncja=- m :>ir bard=
- - ]riw[E71 *3C ~a
Deve.loprnent ProDOSa](SI.l.f ao eement is not reached, both Parties shall
Deleted: s:,aa
present„tbeir respective positions to the Hearing Eaami er,~ppropriate Deleted: pr_mr
a..
Deleted: ar otbrr
hearing body. or administrative official..
c. The Parties agree to consult on Comprehensive PlaeZoning categories,
Deleted:'JGA
allo.z'ablc ]and uses and densities in the omit Planning Areas. Such
consultation shall include consultation on ti-ie classification of streets and
roadways on the common borders.
Deleted: n
7. Other Regulations: \rothing in this gee ement shall supersede or negate any
existing land use or development regulation of the Parties.
3. Additional Agreements: The Parties contemplate firt ire joint planning agreements
Deteted: tog UGA a oth¢ portions of
- o•.ta:y e~Llar
that may relate to other UGA/JPA's or Joint planning Areas Spoknae C
Deleted: tfte (-*tv(rouzi of
\jothina in this 4ereement is intended to prolvUit the Deleted: a
development of fIAUre agreements relating to either the impacts identified above or
other impacts that may now or in the future exist.
Deleted: a
9. Rights -Reserved: Nothing in this ~m£_mPni is intended to waiVe or li_rnit the rights
of the Parties to require mitigation for any impact as allowed by federal, state or local
laws or ordinances including but not limited to environmental impacts governed by
chapter 43.2 i C 1ZCW or mitigation fees Governed by RON 82.02.060
10. Change in Standards or Ordinances: Any change in the Parties respective M
development regulations (ii) comprehensive plans, or (iii) official controls,
reeardless of -avhether they affect the Joint Planning Areas shall be forwarded to the
other party wihin? l days of passage
IL . Mediation of Disputes: Any disputes arising from this agreement tray bs set for
mediation by either party within 30 days of notification of a dispute. Prior to
mediation, the Parties, represented by their elected officials, shall first meet
informally in an attempt to reach resolution. If a mediator cannot be agreed upon
by the Parties, each party shall select one mediator who in turn shall select a third
mediator to conduct the mediation. The decision of the mediation panel shall not be
1Uinding on either Rarty Provided. however. the Parties a-rep to consider in 200d
faith the decision of the mediation panel.
12. Indemnification and Liability:
a. Spokane County shall protect, save harmless, indemnify and defend, at its own
expense, (City,. its elected and appointed officials, officers, employees and
agents, from any loss or claim for damages of any nature whatsoever arising
out of Spokane County's performance of this agreement, including claims by
the Spokane County employee's or third parties, except for those damages
Deleted: e; seq.
Deleted: smaru9ards or ard.=::s retied
tp= it *jr. agrctaiem or modiaed
pars,:= to this Bg7L=ID~t.1,
Deleted:
Deleted:. If o. Pz ies caataat ag = to
the implem--riwi r, of such sfaadards
Mithm 30 days dL iseic may to s . far
roes a lom In. delis parry.
Deleted: a
Deleted: , including the fa:7m: to AV-
es to I&--W rm-ldards anMor applicable
cr6nances as is so; forth in pa=-;pph 10
above,
Deleted: Ffown)
caused solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of (City/Town); its
elected and appointed officials; officers, employees, or agents.
b. (City shall protect, save harmless, indean-4 and defend, at its own expense, -
Spokane County its elected and appointed officials; officers; employees and
agents, from any loss or claim for damages of any natim whatsoever arising
out of (City's/Town's) performance of this agreement, including claims by the
(Cityfrown) employee's or third parties, except for those damages caused
solely by the negligence or willful misconduct of Spokane Cot:nty, its elected
and appointed officials, officers; employees; or agents.
a In the event of liability for damages of any ma;.ure whatsoever arising out of the
performance of this Agreement by Spokane County and (City; including
claims by Spokane Count)'s or (City's, own officers, officials, emplo}gees,
agents, volunteers, or third parties, caused by or resulting frorn the concurrent
negligence of Spokane County and (City, each Parties liability hereunder shall
only be to the extent of that party's negligence.
d. No liability shall be attached to Spokane County or (City,by reason of entering
into this agreement except as expressly provided herein.
13. Severability: If any provision of th;s tk rn cnt or its application to any person or
circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the provisions and/or the application
of the provisions to other persons or circumstances shall nor be affected. In such
case the Parties agree to meet and amend this Agreement as may be mutually
deemed necbssary.
Deleted: /Town)
Ducted: /rewa)
Deleted: /re-om':)
Deleted: /Town)
Deleted: F,--)
Deleted:
Dcictocl: p
Deleted: e
Deleted: a
14. Entire Agreement: This~een~etli constitutes the entire agree~en~ between th
the
.
I Deleted: a
Parics with respect to identified property. This ~eement may be amended in
;Tit:mg by mutual agreement of the Parties.
15. Designated Representative. 'Me Parties agree that the Ma or or his/her .
Deleted: I'M
desiLnee (position) shall be the designated representative of the
Deleted: !!'aaa
City}or coordination of this ,A-~greement and for receipt of any.com unications Deleted:
.
I Deleted: a
related to thisAgreement and the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners
or hia+'her deisnLee (position) shall be the designated
representative of the County.
Deleted: a
16. Effective Date and Duration. Ths,~greeinent shall become effective following the
Deleted: a
approval of the Agreement by the official governing bodies of each of the Panties
. . .
. Deleted: e
hereto and the signing of the r°ement by.. the, duly authorized representative of
each of the Parties hereto, and shall remain in effect unless terminated.
17. ermtttation. Eithea Party may terminate its obligation under this Agreement .
upon one year advance written notice to the other Party. Following a termination,
the County and City are responsible for fulfilling.. any out,tTd.ine obligations
Deleted:
under this eernent Or amendment thereto, incurred prior to the effective date
of the termination.
Deleted: 17.
Formatted: B.diets and Humberi;P~
Formatted: FonC: Bold
Deleted: a
Deleted: e
18. Headings The paraaraph headings appearing in this Agreement have been
Inserted solely for the pumgse 4f convenience and readv reference In nR wpa do
thev mimose tp and shall n -qt be deemed to define. limit or extend tine scope Or
intent of the naragraphs to wb-'.6 they , ertain.
19 C.ounterroarts This Agreement may be executed in anv number of counterparts.
each of which when so executed and delivered. shall be an originaL but such
counterparts stall together constitute but one and the same.
20 Property and Equipment The o'AmershiD of all DroDerty and equipment utilized
by anv Paftty to meet its obligations under the terms of this Agreement shall
remain with such Panty.
21. RCW 39.34 Required clauses
22. Venue Stipulation. .This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having
been made and delivered within the Smtc of Washinston and it is mutually
understood and agreed by each Pam that this Agreement shall be &ovemed by the
laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and perfprmance. Any
action at 1_aw_ sui[ in eouity or iudicial proceedings for the enforcement of this
Aareymcat or any Drovions hereto. shall be instituted only in courts of competent
iurisdiction within Spokane County. Washington.
23 Notices All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed
given on • M the day such notices or other communications re received when sent
bbpe.rsonal delivery or !ii) the third day following the day on which the same
have been mailed by certi5ed mail delivery, receipt requested and postage prepaid
addressed the Parities at the addresses set forth below. or at such other address as
the Pm-ties shaii from time-to-time designate by notice in writing to the other
Parties.
COl i '1'Y: Chairman of the Board of Cgunty Commissioners formatted: line spacing: single
1116 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane. Washin Vton 99260
CITY City of Spokane Mayor orhislher atithorzed reDre;eiltative
Citv Hall
803 West SDOkane Falls Boulevard
Spokane. Washington 99201 Formatted: Line sung: single,
M:mbwed + Level: 1 + Numbering
24. RC W 39.34 Required Clauses. stytC: 1, 2, 3, + Strz at 17 +
Mignment Left + Alignea at: 0.25"
+ Tab after: 0.5" + indent at: 0.5"
A. Purvose Formatted: Indent: Le f", 0.25",
Line spacing: single
Sec Paragrraph 2 above Formatted: VIumbered + Level: 2 +
lumbering Style: F, 8, C, + Start
a:. 1 + .A ignment: Left + Alignej at
B. Duration 0.75" + Tati aRtw: 1" + Indent at:
See Pamraoh 16 above. Formatted: 1,ldent: U ft: 0.75"
Formatted: Nhimbered + Level: 2 +
C Organization of separate entity and its powers Kumbering stye-: A, B, C, + 5--art
at: I + Aligimnent: Left + ABgned at:
0.75" + Tab after: 1' + indent at:
No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the-
1"
provisions of this,ABreernent
Formatted: Indent: IaR: 0.73
Formatted: Indent LeP; 0.75",
D. Res nsibilities of the Parties.
Uae adrw: single
Sp
Formatted: Line spacing: single,
TOViSiOriS abOVe
Se
-
Numbered + L.eve~: 1 + Numbering
.
;
- D
Stele: A, B, C, + Sart at: 5 +
Alignmeat: Left + ned at: 0.75"
E. AETeement to be filed.
+ Tab after 1" + Indr•`. at 1'
•
Formatted: Indent Left: 0.75",
The City shall file thi, rvpreerrient with its City Clerk. The Cor.lnly shall place
Urespadng: single
this Ageement on its web site.
Formatted: Line spacing: single,
Numbered + level: 1 + Numbering
We: A, B,C,...+5'?rtat S+
Financing
F
Aligament Left. + A1"pned at: 0.75"
'
.
+ Tab after: 1" + idant at: 1
Each Party shall be responsible for the financing of its contractual obligations
Formatted: Indent: Leff' : 0.75",
Une spadng: single
wider its normal budgetary Drops.
Formatted: Urie spacing: single,
G. Termination.
See Paiatrraph 17 above.
Line spacing: singke
Numbered + Level: 1 + Numbering
Style: A, B, C, + Sir at: 5 +
Allgruner~t Left + Al:gn~ at 0.75"
+ Tab after. 1" + Indent at 1"
Formatted: indent: L--'t: 0.75',
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Par ies hn e caused this Ameement t he executed on tl&,e
date and wear opposite their remactiye signatwe hlocl s.
- Formatted: A'oiTnal
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY. WASHINGTON
MARK RICHARD. Chaimn
BO>U\iIE MAGER- Vice chair
TODD N ELKE. Commissioner
ATTEST:
Danicla Erickson
Clerk of the Board
CITY OF SPOKANE
B v:
Tile;
ATTEST: Approved as to form:
City Clerk Assistant Cit-v Attgma
Ballot And Potential Ballot Issues - Discussion Document
July -2OD7
Nwmmbe -2007
Spring-2008
Full-2008
Sp&B-7O0g
Fn11-2009
Fail 10
City of
City Center Bond
City Center Bonin
'
Spokane Va9cy
City of
1) l dtw Check X A
Fire Pond
Fire EP43 Lewy
Spokarm
salts Lax Irwr
Propedy Tau Levy
211-avy ud LM
PerksfAcqua6rs
3)PoiWAOpuu5m
bond
4) Albs Sports
Complax. $ % sllr_:
tax levy ll
Inidntkwe to VoW m
Uwtn9 Wage
Spokane
Consen'a0m
1) Sbhs'agic InSaslnn ?
1) New Jsil Bond
Mental iteailh
CominRI.11moca
County
F1ltunes tenswwl
brln .195 sales tax
2) Crhttbh31 Jusiloe
1% sa5as bx levy
.17G Labs sax bvy
2) New Jail Bond
1 .1 % sales lax levy
,apt ino Transit
7
s
Reauthart-o ratsmit;
Reuuthorizo existing
lurllxhrity
0.3% sales lax
0.3% Bales tax
sugnuily
nuihodly
Spokane VaDey
Levy Lid lie
lire Dept.
Spokane Coonry
Bond Iumm for now
Ubnry District
Librarian
Mahn 5dencea
6mbl'ng Le1$s.
Sravtcos Authorily
lakes effed - City eh
lut '
C~Auhy ntey eaMIXish
Spoknno
1)oAm Ftoplammonl
Public Schools
Lm-y
2) Coneivetlon 13nnr1
renewal
4
Stam of
.
nd
VPasMngtan
ly
t
'
ades
-
'
0 Emit
Eymn
esses
'NOTES).
Spokane County h as outhoritr to hold special crccllans In Feb., Mar.. Apr.• m May.
Spokarhe Carty sales Lvc pulhmtmtlom who_ Juvenile Juslix Dec. 20011; htminl Iladdo 04ir. 20011; Cfthml Justice Dec. 2009
Spokano Tmnsit lwUndty sates tax a"rilmdon cypfres Juno 2009
Spokano Phbllc Schools property tax levy eY.plros Spring 2009
Gtr pf ; pokana 13MS bvd rcno of X*v 2010, 5WOct limd rarmawRl N&,. 2014.
['rl
9
H
H
trl
N
AGENDA ITEM #4
NeQUuntuefio
~Q 4a,/
SCd~P6 Pro
Prove that
you care.
License t*
your
pet.
PET LICENSE APPLICTION
SPOKANE COUNTY REGIONAL ANIMAL PROTECTION SERVICE
Cell
Home
OWNER'S NAME PHONE: Work
ADDRESS
DESCRIPTION OF PET: ❑ MALE CINEUTERED
❑ FEMALE
E1SPAYED
Breed Name
Color
DOG
CAT
FEES: NEUTERED/SPAYED
$33.00
$18.00
UNNEIJTERED/UNSPAYED
548.00
$28.00
DISCOUNT (subtract amount if pet under 6 mos. of age
-$20.00
-$10.00
or new pet - acquired in past 30 days).
One Pet per application.
Please make checks payable to S.C.R.A.P.S.
'This license is for residents in unincorporated areas of Spokane County and the City of
Spokane Valley.
RAB I ES# .
Exp. Date NEU/SPAY BY
VET.
S.C.R.A.P.S.
YES, I want to help the animals. 2521 N FLORA RD
Enclosed is my donation of $ SPOKANE WA 99216 -1824
Regional Animal Control - Summary
July 19, 2007
Spokane County Regional Animal Protection Service - SCRAPS has met the last two
months with the city of Spokane regarding a regional animal control service. Recently
we formed a Regional Research Team with Dave Steele - City of Spokane, Morgan
Koudelka - City of Spokane Valley and Nancy Hill - SCRAPS.
The team has developed a draft regional budget to include staffing and operating costs
along with the capital expenditures. Capital expenditures will include an addition to the
SCRAPS facility and start up costs such as upgraded computers, vehicles, equipment,
utvfonns, etc. Additionally, the team has begun discussions with the small cities in
Spokane County. Both Liberty Lake and Airway Heights have recently expressed an
interest. SCRAPS already provides services for Cheney, Ainvay Heights and Fairchild
Air force Base and of course Spokane Valley. Nancy Hill is in the process of talking to
the other cities such as Deer Park, Spangle, Waverly, Rockford, Latah and 'Niedical Lake.
The team is meeting tomorrow at 2:30 with Gerry Gemmill - Spokane County and John
Pilcher - City of Spokane to discuss the results of the team's research to date.
Prior to the regional discussion meetings SCRAPS had proposed a license and other fee
increase as part of an ordinance revision. 1-he revision is almost complete and ready for
public hearing. The revision raises the cost of a spay/neutered license by $5.00 and a
non-spayed/neutered license by 58.00. It also increases the daily board rate from $6.00
to $10.00 and adds some additional fees such as trip costs. This revision has been put on
a short term hold pending the results of the regional discussions. The city of Spokane has
proposed an even higher license fee and we are looking for a middle ground. The goal is
for the license fees to pay more of the cost of the service without making the cost so high
that people will not purchase the tag. Additionally, the regional team is looking for some
economy of scale with a regional program.
My hope is that the city of Spokane will make a decision in the near future to join a
regional program and we can move forward in developing this service.
Nancy Hill
SCRAPS Director