The URL can be used to link to this page

2007, 09-25 Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANF. VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGLq[-A,R.NTE4 E PING Council Meeting #124 I uesdaY, September 25, 2007 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests All Electronic Devices be Turned Off During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor David Cox. ('re tlinc Church of the Najarene PLEDGE OF ALLFGIANCI-:: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUMON OF SPECLIL GUESTS AND PREWNTATIONS: CO11DIFITEE, BOARD, LIAISON SU VI MARY REPORTS: MAJ'OR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMYNTS: 11li:. is an opporlunity for the public W ~pe.4. cm AD) tC1pi:. WWII `,Au ,:0n►c to the podium. plc&se store your name and addrtss for the record and limit remarks to three minutes 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of item considered routine which are approved as a group. A Comicilmeml:cr may rrntove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately, a. Following Claim Vouchers: VOLICHER LIST DATE VOUCHER #s TOTAL VOUCHFR AMOUNT 1109-14-2007 ! 2502-!?837 $747,799_891 h. Pavroll for Period Ending September 15, 2007: S192,602.34 c. Minutes from September 4, 2007 Council Study Session Meeting d. Minutes from September 5, 2007 Special Council Meeting c. Minutes frDm Septemt,cr 7, 2007 Special Council Meeting f Minutes from September 11, 2007 Regular Council Nfecting g. Minutes from September 18.2007 Council Study Session h. Interlocal Agreement For Subrecipient of!•Iomeland SecuritN f undinQ i Expanded Classification Grade, Deputy CaN Mannger posilom j. Holiday Closure Approval NEW BUSINESS: 5ccond Reading Proposed Ordinance 07-015 :adopting Unifilmi Dcticloprncnt Code - Nlikc Connelly (public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any topic. When you conic to the podium. plra~c -titre %,our name and address for the record anti limit rcrnarkt to three minures. `-07 Rr u1:1r Meeting P,1-,_ t of 3. GINIA DISCUSSION: Councilmember.Munson -ILDNIINNTR %,riN,•F. IMPOR I-S: n.'.s INFORMATION ONLN : 4. Fcc Resolution Proposed AmeridmctlLs - hen Thomhsnn s. Departmemil ltcporls EX-ECtTTIVF SESSION- Land Acquisitiot). Pendim, I itismilOn :V11 OURNNIEN i' P t 1(ftf: IILUf I £ Regular Council Ale-eij11 clr,' ' e'1?;'r,!! } %ii'i;1 '!LI .1!1;: f (l '~efil:'ti, 1' ' '!!!111!1 :f h lnl f 771. C'uun~il Stunts' .Ses~inn.ti tire gene•ral(1• held 1". T' and .5th f'ut ~~/a1 e. begirurin.iv at h: 00 p.rrr. Other Tentative L:pcontinr AfeeNn s F.reisty: tit711(-F: 1ndi~uluals pt;ut<ung to mcnd the mcchne, •.kho require Special assis.vtce to ac crm~tuxfsic phv~ical, hearing or othu impairments, plcase contact the City Clerk at (501)1921-1000 as upon as possiblc so that enangemcnts rmy be made. 1 -ILniai :1gc:u1 U?•_. -U7 Rceui e: \(c; ue;: Y"ge - of CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 25, 2007 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report El pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the 1=ollowi ng Vouchers: BACKGROUND: VOUCHER LIST VOUCH-R Os I TOTAJ, \'OUCHT-,R AjMOLNT DATE 09-14-07 12502 -128337 $747,799.89 GRAND TOTAL $747,799.89 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists l vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 0911412007 2:50:06PM I Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank I Voucher Date Vendor I Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12502 8117/2007 000928 KLEIN, TIM Reimb union dues REIMBURSE UNION DUES 43.85 _ Total : 43.85 12685 8/30/2007 000724 FAULKNER, JASON 915107 payroll PAYROLL PROCESSING FOR 915/0. 250.00 Total : 250.00 12695 8/3012007 000212 ANS OF WASHINGTON, INC Notary Stamp NOTARY SEALS: PERMIT CTR 290.49 i Total : 290.49 12696 8/3012007 000211 STATE TREASURER Notary Application NOTARY APP: DAVIS 30.00 Total : 30.00 12697 8/3012007 000211 STATE TREASURER Notary Application NOTARY APP: MAIN 30.00 Total : 30.00 12698 8/30/2007 000211 STATE TREASURER Notary Application NOTARY APP: PRINCE 30.00 Total : 30.00 12699 8/3112007 001470 MATTHEWS, MOLLY 915 Pay Draw DRAW CH FOR 9/5107 PP 575.19 Total : 575.19 12700 9/4/2007 000324 SPOKANE CO. WATER DIST. #3 170-0040-03 'J%/ATER BILLING 279.53 Total : 279.53 12701 9/4/2007 000324 SPOKANE CO. WATER DIST. 113 475-1495-00 WATER BILLING 77.15 Total : 77.15 12702 9/412007 OD0324 SPOKANE CO. WATER DIST. #3 170-0040-03 WATER BILLING 406.72 Total : 406.72 12703 9/4/2007 000324 SPOKANE CO. WATER DIST. 143 475-1495-00 WATER BILLING 81.00 Total : 81.00 12704 915/2007 000060 DENENNY, RICHARD I 9/5 PY DIR DEP FAILED 915 686.47 Total : 686.47 12705 9/512007 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAE 1 9/5 PY DIR DEP FAILED 915 686.47 Page: 1 i vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 09/1412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley t Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount r 12705 9/5/2007 000059 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL (Continued) Total : 686.47 12706 915/2007 000062 MUNSON, RICHARD I 915 PY DIP DEP FAILED 9/5 598.14 Total : 598.14 12707 9/512007 000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY 915 PY DIR DEP FAILED 915 678.14 Total : 678.14 12708 9/512007 000063 TAYLOR, STEVE 9/5 PY DIP DEP FAILED 915 686.47 Total : 686.47 12709 916!2007 001485 NARVRE Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT . 50.00 Total : 50.00 12710 916/2007 001502 NILSON, COLLEEN Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00 Tota 1 : 50.00 12711 916/2007 001504 MEYERS, CHARLIE Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00 Total : 50.00 12712 9/6/2007 001484 WARNER, GRACE W Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00 Total : 50.00 12713 9/7/2007 000028 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANK 1829 MC. 1829 1,185.34 Total : 1,185.34 12715 9/11/2007 000295 VALLEYFEST Focus Group ROUND 1: FOCUS GROUP 3,000.00 Total : 3,000.00 12716 9111/2007 000295 VALLEYFEST Lively Times ROUND 1: LIVELY TIMES 688.50 Total : 688.50 12717 9/1112007 000060 DENENNY, RICHARD ' 915 PY DIP DEP FAILED 915-REPI-4CEMEN 686.47 Total : 686.47 12718 9/1212007 000600 NCARB NCARB 27445 NCARB CERTIFICATE. KERSTON 190.00 Total : 190.00 12719 9112/2007 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 1914734 CENTENNIAL TRAIL 1,938.51 Paae: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 0911412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount 12719 911212007 000709 000709 SENSKE LIIAWN & TRITE CARE INC. (Continued) Total : 1,938.51 12720 911212007 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREr CARE INC. 1914740 895 CONTRACT MAINT: CP 49,799.38 Total : 49,799.38 12721 9/12/2007 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 1783676 VEG MGT FOLLOWUP 51.04 Total : 51.04 12722 9/12/2007 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 1914735 LANDSCAPING SERVICE: CENTENI 1,938.51 I Total : 1,938.51 12723 9112/2007 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 1914741 LANDSCAPING @ CENTERPLACE• 49,799.38 Total : 49,799.38 12724 9/1412007 000958 AAA SWEEPING, LLC 38769 STREET SWEEPING 12,023.05 Total : 12,023.05 12725 911412_007 001107 ADVANCEDTRAFFIC PRODUCTIONS 22561 41741 LED SIGNAL HEADS 13,793.77 1 Total : 13,793.77 12726 9/14/2007 000197 AIR INC. 8202 PRE= EMPLOYMENT SCREENING 250.00 Total : 250.00 12727 9/1412007 000986 ALLISON'S FABRICATI~DN 868 LIFT RENTAL 537.57 Total : 537.57 12728 9/1412007 001081 ALSCO LSP0260426 MATS FOR PRECINCT 10.74 LSP0268252 MATS FOR PRECINCT 13.30 LSP0272179 MATS: CITY HALL 64.20 LSP028077 MATS FOR CITY HALL 64.20 Total : 152.44 12729- 911412007 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC. 6-27605 OIL CHANGE: 05 CHEVY P1UP 25.72 6-27718 SERVICE: 05 DAKOTA 49.03 Total : 74.75 12730 9/14/2007 001463 AMERICAN TRAINCO 38194 41766 TRAINING 890.00 Total : 890.00 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 09/14/2007 2:50:06PM I Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor I Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12731 9114/2007 000212 ANS OF WASHINGTON, INC Mylar Stamps MYLAR NOTARY STAMPS 92.56 I Total : 92.56 12732 9/14/2007 000334 ARGUS JANITORIAL SERVICE, INC. INVO00468 JANITORIAL SERVICES: PRECINCT 2,082.17 1 Total : 2,082.17 12733 9/1412007 000277 ASSOC. OF WA CITIES 1919 AWC: DENENNY 90.00 Total : 90.00 I 12734 911412007 001012 ASSOCIATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS 162847 MONTHLY BILLING: 3260C 1,435.89 Total : 1,435.89 12735 9/1412007 000030 AVISTA UTILITIES 090091047 UTILITIES: 2426 N DISCOVERY PL 6,655.34 410102159 BARKER/MISSION SIGNAL 44.11 Total : 6,699.45 12736 9/1412007 000168 B & C TELEPHONE INC. 137792 SERVICE ON PHONES: CP 323.09 138004 SERVICE ON PHONES: CP 145.52 Total : 468.61 I 12737 911412007 001117 BASINGER. MICHAEL L. Expense EXPENSES: BASINGER 5.03 Total : 5.03 12738 9/1412007 000841 BCI CREATIVE INC. 8273 WEB HOSTING 240.00 Tota 1 : 240.00 12739 9/1412007 000944 BENTLEY, NIK Expense Form TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT 165.35 Total : 165.35 12740 9114/2.007 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY, INC. 8845023 LINEN SERVICE: CP 380.99 8846962 LINEN SERVICE: CP 381.14 8848924 LINEN SERVICE: CP 391.05 8850852 LINEN SERVICE: CP 379.46 Total : 1,532.64 12741 9114/2007 000101 CDWG GQT0223 41787 BROTHER HL 4040 CN COLOR LAS 658.52 GRC5451 41787 BROTHER HL 4040 CN COLOR LAS 56.94 Paste: 4 I vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 0911412007 2:50:06PM I Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 12741 9/14/2007 000101 000101 CDWG I (Continued) Total: 715.46 12742 9/1417-007 004863 CENTURY WEST ENGINEERING CORP. 0236061 41266 0039 - 06-016 ARGONNE ROAD OVI 3,483.42 Total : 3,483.42 12743 9/14/2007 000729 CH2MHILL INC. 358105 41588 CONTRACT NO. 07-011 CH2M PLA& 1,804.00 Total : 1,804.00 12744 9/1412007 000143 CITY OF SPOKANE 00104058 VALLEY TRANSFER 99.25 Total : 99.25 12745 9/14/2007 001440 CLEARPATH, LLC 235 CITY CTR PROPERTY NEGOTIATIO 3,190.00 Total : 3,190.00 12746 9114/2007 000957 COBALT TRUCK EQUIPMENT 22221 41799 COBALT - TOOL BOX FOR DEV. PIC 617.25 Total : 617.25 12747 9114/2007 000571 CODE PUBLISHING COMPANY 28994 ELECTRONIC UPDATE 114.35 1 Total : 114.35 12748 9/14/2007 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 52693 COFFEE SERVICE: CP 140.80 i 52853 COFFEE SERVICE: CITY HALL 196.91 53164 COFFEE SERVICE: CP 31.90 53165 COFFEE SERVICE: CITY HALL 136.62 Total : 506.23 12749 9/14/2007 000606 COLUMBIA FIBER SOLUTIONS 1005 DARK FIBER LEASE 228.06 Total : 228.06 12750 9/1412007 001148 COLUMBIA PAINT 8, CI ATINGS 823487 41768 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 443.15 Total : 443.15 12751 911412007 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLI ET 87016-6725 AUGUST FLEET FUEL BILL 2,665.29 Total : 2,665.29 12752 9/1412007 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DIST 05859.0 WATER: DISCOVERY PL 134.57 06377.0 WATER: DISCOVERY PL 55.30 i 06377.2 WATER: DISCOVERY PL 629.37 Page: 5 I vchlist Voucher List Page: 6 0911412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley I Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor I Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12752 9/14/2007 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DIST (Continued) 11534.2 WATER: DISCOVERY PL SP N 20.57 11082.2 WATER: BARKER RD 28.65 11983.2 WATER: BARKER RD 15.71 11984.2 WATER: BARKER RD 39.75 11984.2 WATER: BARKER RD 19.37 Total : 943.29 12753 9/14/2007 000035 CORPORATE EXPRESS 167451733001 41784 INKJET PRINT CARTRIDGE 104.35 Total : 104.35 12754 9114/2007 001157 COUNTRY HOMES POWER EQUIPMENT 48891 41779 BILLY GOAT MOWER PURCHASE 2,117.70 Tota I : 2,117.70 i 12755 9/14/2007 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIATES 229864 PROJECT: SPKV0000-0011 4,930.00 Total : 4,930.00 12756 9/1412007 000693 DEPT OF INFORMATION SERVICES 2007080217 41777 MICROSOFT PROJECT 2007 692.25 2007080217 MASTER LICENSE SYSTEM 22.89 Total : 715.14 12757 9/1412007 000152 DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION RE-313-ATS70814079 TRAFFIC SVC MAINTENANCE 2,833.00 RE-313-ATB70814080 ROADWAY/MAINTENANCE 2,883.81 RE-313-ATB70814120 PINES/MANSFIELD CORR 260.48 Total : 5,977.29 12758 9/14/2007 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL Mileage MILEAGE": DEVLEMING 89.24 Total : 89.24 12759 9/14/2007 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST 311314582 ONGOING ADVERTISING 293.84 Total : 293.84 12760 9/14/2007 001311 DICKERSON PUMP & IRRIGA'T'ION 7055 41676 STORMWATER IMPELLER PUMPS 4,688.73 Total : 4,688.73 12761 9/14/2007 001249 DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY P18178160101 41790 RECREATION PROGRAM SUPPLIE: 82.30 Total : 82.30 Page: 6 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7 0911412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12762 911412007 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST #1 02051000 'H2O: EDGECLIFF PARK 69.58 Total : 69.58 12763 911412007 000999 EASTERN WA ATTORNEY SVC, INC 00023364 ATTORNEY SERVICES 40.00 Total : 40.00 12764 9/1412007 000987 ECOLAB 3374259 41785 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 129.00 Total : 129.00 12765 9114/2007 001508 FLETCHER, KEN Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 323.25 Total : 323.25 12766 9/1412007 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 29411 LEGAL AD: CITY CLERK 25.00 29412 LEGAL AD: CITY CLERK 25.00 29413 LEGAL AD: PLANNING 57.00 29439 LEGAL AD: PW 131.60 29440 LEGAL AD: CITY CLERK 42.00 29441 LEGAL AD: CITY CLERK 32.20 29443 LEGAL AD: PLANNING 68.25 Total : 381.05 I ' 12767 9/14/2007 000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER 41500374 JULY 07 WORK CREW 5,148.21 Total : 5,148.21 12768 9114/2..007 000839 GENERAL FIRE EQUIP. CO. 0085157 SERVICE CALL: CP 156.22 Total : 156.22 12769 9/14/2007 001345 GIBBS PLANNING GROUP 07-173 SPOKANE VALLEY CITY CTR 5,339.23 Total : 5,339.23 1'2770 9/1412007 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL 8042 L013BYIST SERVICES 2,184.55 Total : 2,184.55 12771 9/1412007 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INCORPORATED 57303 ANNUAL: MERCIER 45.00 57306 ANNUAL: DEVLEMING 55.00 57326 HIGHLY TRAINED WORKFORCE 35.00 Total : 135.00 Page: 7 vchlist Voucher List Page: 8 0911412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO O Description/Account Amount 12772 9/14/2007 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 106263 ADVERTISING: 2007 DIRECTORY 275.00 Total : 275.00 12773 9/14/2007 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 133658 FAX PAPER: FRONT DESK 224.05 160374 COLOR COPIES: 7300 91.83 161590 B/W COPIES: 1232 98.79 161591 COLOR COPIES: 1232 71.98 161917 COLOR COPIES: 2238 387.84 Total : 874.49 12774 9/1412007 000505 H & H FINANCIAL SERVICES INC. 1419 JULY LEASE PMT: 2045E 233.49 1420 JULY LEASE PMT: 2238C 307.34 1421 JULY LEASE: 2060SP 412.68 1470 AUG LEASE PMT: 2045E 233.49 1471 AUG LEASE PMT: 2238C 307.34 1472 AUG LEASE PMT: 2060SP 412.68 15116 SEPT LEASE PMT: WEST WING 233.49 1517 SEPT LEASE PMT: PARKS 307.34 1518 SEPT LEASE PMT: 2060 412.68 Total : 2,860.53 12775 9/14/2007 000441 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL CREDIT 0070971 SUPPLIES: CP 42.39 3010417 SUPPLIES: PW 43.37 5079205 SUPPLIES: PW 14.06 8053580 SUPPLIES: CP 189.01 Total : 288.83 12776 9114/2007 001326 INHS TC-12099 1ST AID/PEDCARDS 50.00 Total : 50.00 12777 9/14/2007 000393 INLAND AUDIOVISUAL 9090 AUDIO EQUIP: CP 54.30 Total : 54.30 12778 9/14/2007 000022 INLAND BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. 55353 ID CARD: D ARNDT 23.89 55357 ID CARD: NEWBILL 23.89 Total : 47.78 12779 9114/2007 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO 94202-002 UTILITIES 40.14 Page: 8 vchlist Voucher List Page: 9 0911412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12779 9114/2007 000070 INLAND POWER & LIGHT CO (Continued) 94202-003 UTILITIES 65.55 94202-005 UTILITIES 142.60 94202-006 UTILITIES 201.60 Total : 449.89 12780 9/14/2007 000288 INT'L CODE COUNCIL 0423194-IN CODE BOOKS 264.10 Total : 264.10 12781 9114/2007 000655 INT'I- CODE COUNCIL: RENEWALS ICC Certification ICC CERT: J GRISSOM 70.00 Total : 70.00 12782 9/14/2007 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #6 112500.0 13504 E MIRABEAU PKY: WATER 166.00 Total : 166.00 12783 9/14/2007 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS INC. 002218502 CLASSIFIED AD: PW 280.00 Total : 280.00 12784 9/14/2007 001111 LAIDLAW 515371 AUG TRANSPORTATION 2,457.40 Total : 2,457.40 12785 9/14/2007 000755 LEAGUE OF OREGON CITIES 6189 WEB AD: DEPUTY CITY MGR 45.00 Total : 45.00 12786 9/1412007 001506 MALLONEE, SHAWNA Refund REFUND: AQUATICS TV 75.00 Total : 75.00 12787 911412007 000076 MCNUTT, STAN E 083007 CITY MANAGER 2007 EVALUATION 2,447.86 Total : 2,447.86 12788 9114/2007 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00017248 TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE RENTAL 341.95 Total : 341.95 12789 9/1412007 001054 MOBIUS KIDS Field Trip SUMMER CAMP FIELD TRIP 150.00 Total : 150.00 12790 911412007 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY 04500-01 UTILITIES 75.35 04515-02 UTILITIES 52.09 Page: 9 vchlist Voucher List Page: 10 09/14/2007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO tt Description/Account Amount 12790 9114/2007 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY (Continued) 04553-01 UTILITIES 66.47 04556-01 UTILITIES 80.80 04605-02 UTILITIES 50.39 04639-02 UTILITIES 57.66 04669-02 UTILITIES 57.22 04691-02 UTILITIES 52.92 04745-02 UTILITIES 65.98 04792-02 UTILITIES 65.26 04836-02 UTILITIES 70.22 04966-02 UTILITIES 6,036.90 04971-01 UTILITIES 114.52 06811-02 UTILITIES 71.21 07099-02 UTILITIES 64.00 07247-02 UTILITIES 69.12 07750-02 UTILITIES 34.30 07850-02 UTILITIES 65.15 07861-02 UTILITIES 58.32 08297-02 UTILITIES 62.01 08343-02 UTILITIES 84.05 09779-01 UTILITIES 244.00 09909-02 UTILITIES 75.84 09910-02 UTILITIES 26.53 09911-02 UTILITIES 73.09 09963-02 UTILITIES 32.75 100038-01 UTILITIES 48.00 10031-02 UTILITIES 12.20 10039-01 UTILITIES 29.80 10040-01 UTILITIES 29.80 10041-01 UTILITIES 29.80 10042-01 UTILITIES 22.60 10046-02 UTILITIES 50.99 10049-02 UTILITIES 39.89 10176-01 UTILITIES 22.60 Total : 8,091.83 12791 9/1412007 001445 MOSS ADAMS, LLP 1347402 CPA SERVICES 337.50 Pape: 10 I vchlist Voucher List page: 11 0911412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12791 9/14/2007 001445 001445 MOSS ADAMS, LLP (Continued) Total : 337.50 12792 9/14/2007 000662 NAIL BARRICADE & SIGN CO 56938 41462 NATIONAL BARRICADE BLANKET F 50.82 57152 41462 NATIONAL BARRICADE BLANKET F 50.82 Total : 101.64 12793 9/1412007 000283 NATIONAL RECREATION & PARK, ASSO 777-33690 41792 TRAINING 675.00 Tota 1 : 675.00 12794 9/14/2007 001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMENT 15404 SERVER MAINTENANCE ' 1,668.75 15467 SEP-OCT MONTHLY SERVICE 1,047.00 Total : 2,715.75 12795 9/14/2007 001507 NORRIS, TONIA M Refund AQUATICS REFUND: TV 25.00 Total : 25.00 12796 9/14/2007 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC 2nd Qtr CAM 2ND QTR CAM CHARGES 1,053.92 Total : 1,053.92 12797 911412007 001091 NORTHWEST GIS USER GROUP Aaron Clary 41801 22ND ANNUAL NW GIS USER CONI 970.00 Total : 970.00 12798 9114/2007 001505 NW LEGAL SUPPORT 137151 CASE # 26268-5-111 125.00 Total : 125.00 12799 911412007 000187 NW MUSEUM OF ARTS & CULTURE 071N0261 41659 SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 108.00 Total : 108.00 12800 9114/2007 000058 OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE ASSOC. A500163 PRE-ENPLOYMENT SCREENING 296.00 Total : 296.00 12801 9/14/2007 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 398069596-001 41772 OFFICE DEPOT SUPPLIES 139.07 398069667-001 41772 OFFICE DEPOT SUPPLIES 218.54 398445851-001 41776 OFFICE SUPPLIES 221.80 398446563-001 41776 308-478 paperclips for Gay 25.22 398771270-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 20.93 398855280-001 41781 DG- 139.85 398855409-001 41781 DG- 40.39 Page: 11 vchlist Voucher List Page: 12, 09114/2007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12801 9/14/2007 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. (Continued) 399025924-001 41782 DG-Office Supplies- 78.10 399346400-001 41783 35OW POWER INVERTER 117.52 399819025-001 41788 215-673 calendars for front desk 264.15 399819082-001 41788 215-673 calendars for front desk 26.40 Total : 1,291.97 12802 9114/2007 000512 OFFICETEAM 19347374 STAFFING SERVICE: FONTAINE 660.00 19400922 STAFF SVC: FONTAINE 445.50 Total : 1,105.50 12803 911412007 000899 ONEEIGHTY NETWORKS 580848 SERVICE FOR CP & CITY HALL 1,464.32 Total : 1,464.32 12804 9/14/2007 001258 ORB ARCHITECTS INC. 3 41599 DESIGN OF POOL - PARK ROAD 1,820.83 3 41600 DESIGN OF POOL -TERRACE VEIV 1,820.83 41600 3 41601 DESIGN OF POOL - VALLEY MISSIC 1,820.83 41601 Total : 5,462.49 12805 9/14/2007 000119 PIP PRINTING INC. 1330038414 BUSINESS CARDS/NAME PLATES 189.30 1330038843 BUSINESS CARD SHELLS 1,472.05 1330038856 BUSINESS CARDS/NAME PLATES 486.66 Total : 2,148.01 12806 9/1412007 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. 42405 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 72,106.58 42406 41677 s,r & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 56,306.05 42407 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 19,718.25 42408 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 111,170.61 42409 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 9,689.25 42410 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 12,310.48 42411 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 40,391.73 42412 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 35,627.83 42413 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 5,016.41 42414 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 1,871.64 42415 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 692.55 42416 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 6,755.40 Page: 12 vchlist Voucher List Page: 13 09/1412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12806 911412007 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. (Continued) 42417 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 274.05 42418 41677 ST & SW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR 270.00 Total : 372,200.83 12807 9114/2007 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERVICES 24.671 STAFFING SERVICES: CP 1,085.30 24.914 STAFFING SERVICE: CP- 1,064.34 25.049 STAFFING SERVICE: CP 1,131.20 25.235 STAFFING SERVICE: CP 1,120.80 25.258 STAFFING SERVICE: CP 10.37 Total : 4,412.01 12808 9/14/2007 000291 PROJECT ACCESS, INC. 7 3RD QUARTER SERVICES 7,500.00 Total : 7,500.00 12809 9/14/2007 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 19563 VEHICLE LOGOS 130.32 Tota 1 : 130.32 12810 9/1412007 000322 OWEST 509-924-4707 7408 TERRACE VIEW PHONE 98.50 509-926-1840 1948 PARK ROAD PHONE SVC 288.99 509-926-1840 1946 PARK ROAD PHONE SVC 98.86 509-926-1840 194D PARK ROAD PHONE SVC 100.12 Total : 586.47 12811 9/14/2007 001510 ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY 400872123-001 GRAMMAR & WRITING 1,995.00 Total : 1,995.00 12812 9114/2007 000153 ROLLER VALLEY 5971 41652 SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 172.25 Tota 1 : 172.25 12813 911412007 000415 ROSAUERS U-CITY INC. 584618 SUMMER CAMP SUPPLIES 16.27 616457 SUMMER CAMP SUPPLIES 18.05 Total : 34.32 12814 9/1412007 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 1783675 320-1 VEG MGT FOLLOWUP 51.04 Total : 51.04 12815 9/1417-007 000935 SERVICE PAPER COMPANY 30407344 41770 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 678.63 Page: 13 vchlist Voucher List Page: 14 09/1412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO it Description/Account Amount 12815 9/14/2007 000935 SERVICE PAPER COMPANY (Continued) 30408172 41786 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 948.82 30408174 41786 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 54.46 Total : 1,681.91 12816 9/1412007 000726 SHUR KLEEN SERVICES, INC. 66876 CARPET CLEANING: CP 1,317.00 66914 CARPET CLEANING: CP 235.00 66991 41795 JANITORIAL SERVICE 150.00 Total: 1,702.00 12817 9/1412007 000189 SILVERWOOD THEME PARK INC. 19021 41654 SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 1,241.76 Total : 1,241.76 12818 9/14/2007 000779 SOUTHARD, BRAD 301314 41495 QUOTE- NO. 0003.07 DEAD ANIMAL 780.00 Total : 780.00 12819 9/1412007 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS IVC040140 41763 SPECIAL ASPHALT COLD MIX 1,290.17 Total: 1,290.17 12820 911412007 000710 SPOKANE CO BAR ASSOC CB612037 COPIES: DEC 2006 025 CB704041 COPIES: APR 2007 0.75 CB708051 COPIES: AUG 2007 12.25 Total : 13.25 12821 911412007 000459 SPOKANE CO. TITLE CO. 137262 RUDDACH TITLE CANCEL FEE 81.45 Total : 81.45 12822 9/1412007 000001 SPOKANE CO. TREASURER 41500359 JULY 2007 STANDARD HOUSING 22,929.00 Total : 22,929.00 12823 9/14/2007 000323 SPOKANE CO. UTILITIES 015364-065364 13525 E 24TH: SEWER 352.32 0166311066631 1901 N SULLIVAN RD: SEWER 58.13 0170221067022 105 N BALFOUR: SEWER 165.48 0244331074433 906 N PARK RD: SEWER 165.48 027129/077129 12710 E SPRAGUE: SEWER 42.58 0316081081608 11423 EMISSION: SEWER 255.19 034354/106428 606 S PARK RD: SEWER 131.63 037059/109325 13504 E MIRABEAU PKY: SEWER 131.63 _Page: 14 vchlist Voucher List Page: 15 09/1412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12823 9/14/2007 000323 SPOKANE CO. UTILITIES (ConJnUed) 0429031115953 2426 N DISCOVERY PL: SEWER 781.95 Total : 2,084.39 12824 9/14/2007 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB 7/31107V LODGING CONTRACT 14,754.00 Total : 14,754.00 12825 9/14/2007 000487 SPOKANE VALLEY YMCA 70832 41684 SUMMER DAY CAMP FIELD TRIP 156.00 Total : 155.00 12826 9/14/2007 000939 SPRAGUE & SULLIVAN MINISTORAGE 28353 SEPT RENT 123.00 Total : 123.00 12827 9114/2007 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 23779 MAY MONTHLY MAINT 477.10 23780 JUN 2007 MONTHLY MAINT 477.10 23781 JUL 2007 MONTHLY MAINT 477.10 23858 AUG 2007 MONTHLY MAINT 477.10 Total : 1,908.40 12828 9/14/2007 001472 TEST AMERICA 59700775 41760 VACTORING & SWEEPING DISPOS 262.50 Total : 262.50 12829 9/14/2007 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW INC. 42365 LEGAL ADS: PW 1,151.88 42365 CLASSIFIED ADS 236.34 42801 41774 ADVERTISING 3,934.45 50869 EMPLOYMENT ADS: HR 1,440.40 Total : 6,763.07 12830 9/14/2007 001464 TIME WARNER TELECOM 01687720 CENTF_RPLACE INTERNET 904.06 Total : 904.06 12831 9/14/2007 001024 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST 67637885-001 41466 UNITED RENTALS BLANKET PO 122.62 Total : 122.62 12832 9/1412007 000723 US HEALTH WORKS 0192247-WA NEW HIRE PHYSICAL 121.00 Total : 121.00 12833 9/14/2007 000167 VERA WATER & POViER 0007-017753.01 UTILITY BILLING 16.18 Page: 15 vchlist Voucher List Page: 16 09/1412007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 12833 9/14/2007 000167 VERA WATER & POWER (Continued) 0008-010790.01 UTILITY FILLING 56.40 0010-003488.01 UTILITY BILLING 13612 0011-010826.01 UTILITY BILLING 39.95 0012-004137.02 UTILITY BILLING 59.67 0013-032589.01 UTILITY FILLING 70.45 0014-004275.01 UTILITIES 25.64 0014-032971.00 UTILITIES 45.52 001G-007780.00 UTILITIES: TV POOL 584.39 0030-031942.01 UTILITY BILLING 48.38 Total : 1,083.30 12834 9/14/2007 000005 VMI, INC 196578 41775 ADJUSTABLE DESK MIC STAND 111.01 Total : 111.01 12835 9/1412007 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0037447-2681-5 WEEKLY TRASH SVC: CP 124.18 0038518-1518-7 LANDFILL FEES 123.75 1989819-2681-1 WEEKLY TRASH SERVICE: CP 313.33 1989820-2681-8 WEEKLY TRASH SERVICE 520.26 Tota 1 : 1,081.52 12836 9/1412007 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 0218340259 PHONE LINE SERVICE 1,605.72 Total : 1,605.72 12837 9114/2007 000766 YMCA OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST July 2007 YMCA MANAGEMENT CONTR. 59,593.00 Total : 59,593.00 144 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 747,799.89 144 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 747,799.89 Paac: 16 vchlist Voucher List Page: 17 09114/2007 2:50:06PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 1, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services .rendered, or the labor performed a described. herein and that the claim is just, due and an Unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that l am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Mayor ~ Date, Council Merri r Date Page: 17 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 09-25-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: 0 consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending September 15, 2007 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Gross: $ 169,073.67 Benefits: $ 23 527.67 TOTAL PAYROLL: $ 192,602.34 STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri ATTACHMENTS Draft NUNUTES CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Tuesday, September 4, 2007 Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the meeting. Present: Councilmembers: Staff: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Dick Denenny, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manger Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner )Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Rich Munson, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Rick VanLeuven, Police Chief Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Emplovee Introductions: Planning Manager McCormick introduced the following new employees: Darla Arnold, Office Assistant; Joe Gilbert, Engineering Tech; Patty Romero, Office Assistant; and Marty Palaniuk, Planning Technician. Council welcomed and greeted the new employees. 1. Uniform Development Code Deliberation - Greg McCormick & Scott Kuhta Council discussion began with Title 22, section 120 Wireless Communication Facilities. Although there was discussion on several aspects of Title 22, the following are the agreed upon changes: 22.130. Streets, Sidewalks and.Public Places 22.130.010. Purpose and Intent. - no change [editor's note: typographical error, last sentence: "(4) Clarify the authority of the Development Services Senior Engineer in regardm to the future location..." omit "s" from word regard.] 22.130.050. Regional Pavement Cut Policy. Consensus to include table title under table 22.130-1. 22.130.080. Modification of Standards. Consensus to strike the entire paragraph except the last sentence; new paragraph to now read: "Council shall periodically review the standards for road and sewer construction and modify and amend the same from time to time as necessary." 22.140.020. Initiation of Vacation It was mentioned that 44 and #6 mentions 60 and 20 days, and item 95 refers to calendar days. City Attorney Connelly will check and make changes as appropriate. 22.140.040. City Council Decision. City Attorney Connelly suggested omitting the last sentence of #4 so that we are not obligated to have every title transfer performed by quitclaim deed as there are other means. Council concurred. There were no other suggested changes to Title 22. w Mccting Minutes: 09-04-07 Page I of 3 Approved by Council: Draft Mayor Wilhite mentioned that there were comments about the airport overlay including concerns of the J water district, and she asked if there was Council consensus to ask staff to go to the Planning Commission and Review that issue to see if any alternatives could be considered. There followed brief discussion concerning the airport overlay ordinance and it was ultimately agreed that staff will prepare a future administrative report assessing the potential risk and range of discretion council has in that regard. August 28, 2007 Memorandum re Proposed Changes to Titles 12, 20 & 22 UDC Mr. Kuhta explained that he and Mr. McCormick put this memorandum together to address outstanding questions on all titles. There was discussion on adding "electric substations" and "transmissions lines" to the community facilities definition to fully address Avista's concerns; and Mr. K.uhta remarked that public utility transmission and local distribution facility are defined but not in the permitted use matrix, and that staff will research further to determine the most appropriate place to add that. Subdivision exemption: 20.10.020 Exemptions: The memorandum mentions that Avista's concerns appear to be covered by the noted exemption from subdivision rules; however, it was council consensus to change "consumer or investor owned" to "public or privately owned." Rezone Criteria: 12.30.030 Site Specific Zoning Map Amendments After brief discussion on this section, there was Council consensus that in order to be consistent with concurrency, that "f' would be deleted from #2. There was no consensus to include the "possible additional criteria." 12.1 10.040 Pipeline Hazard Overlay - Council consensus to add the following suggested language: "The following regulations shall only appty to the pipeline facilities identified in Section 3.7 of the City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive .Plan. " 22.70.020 General Provisions - Fencing Council consensus to accept the suggested changes in #2. Outdoor Lightinp- Standards There was brief discussion concerning lighting af'eecting residential areas, rights-of-way, transition zones, and buffers, but there were no further suggestions to add to this section. Mayor Wilhite called for a recess at 7:22 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Appendix A Schedule of Permitted Uses Planning Manager McCormick and Senior Planner Kuhta explained the proposed changes on the use matrix. The following changes are those proposed by Council in addition to those already noted on the use matrix: Assisted Living Facility: Council consensus to delete City Center use, and add Garden Office use. Bee keeping: staff will add the specific subsection reference 150(3) Brewery, winery and/or distillery: consensus to add City Center exercise facility/gym athletic club: staff will add conditions as it appears they were omitted; and will re- examine including the suggestion of also adding manufacturing. Meeting Minutes: 09-04-07 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: Draft Hazardous waste treatment and storage: Mr. McCormick said this item needs further research. Kennels: Lengthy discussion on this item included a comment from Mayor Wilhite who said that Nancy Hill (SCRAPS Manager) has a list of people who have commercial kennels with outdoor runs and that the Mayor will provide that list to Mr. McCormick; comments connected with outside runs and the SCRAPS facility; and that animal shelters are listed separately as permitted in both industrial zones and that SCRAPS is an animal shelter. Mr. Kuhta said that if commercial kennels and veterinarian clinics should be separate, a determination needs to be made to decide where those are allowed and under what conditions. Mr. Kuhta also mentioned there is an incorrect reference in kennels and he will correct that. Mr. Connelly said that if the intent is to restrict puppy mills, there needs to be a restriction on the number of allowed pets spayed or unspayed. It was determined that topic will be a topic for future discussions. Storage, general- indoors: consensus to delete this since this category is covered under "warehouse." No further changes were suggested for Appendix 19-A. Mr. Mercier said there appears to be four outstanding issues for Title 19: definition of transmission line, and the remaining to deal with use matrix on hazardous treatment and storage; additional information for kennel and for storage for above-ground. Mayor Wilhite mentioned council received a copy of the zoning map and tomorrow will receive a larger copy. Advance Agenda Brief mention of animal control and the suggestion of creating an ordinance to require dog andlor cat license upon sale of animals; and the idea of requiring veterinarian or pet owners to report animal purchase or during vet visits; that Spokane is considering higher fees than what SCRAPS suggested; and that more research is needed before requiring veterinarians to send animal info. The topic was brought up of the parking issue with the high school as mentioned by a member of the public during public comment, and it was mentioned that perhaps this issue should be presented to the School District to see if the resource officer can assist. Council check-in Mayor Wilhite asked if Council feels the need to schedule a September 10 meeting, or if Council feels everything can be completed by tomorrow night. "1'he consensus was not to hold a September 10 meeting, and that in the interim, Councilmembers will review again the May 25 letter from Dullanty. City Manager Comments Mr. Mercier said stab continues to work toward the September 25 UDC adoption date; and that the last public hearing is set for September 11, and if any substantial changes are to be made after the last public hearing, another public hearing would need to be scheduled. He also mentioned that all UDC titles as well as the land use map and matrix will be made available to Council as soon as possible. It was moved by Councilmember Schimmels and seconded to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:44 p.m. ATTEST : Diana Wilhite, Mayor 1 Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Meeting Minutes: 09-44-07 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT M MUTES i City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting Uniform Development Code Discussion Wednesday, September S, 2007 Attendance: Councilmembers: Staff: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Dick Denen.ny, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Alike DeVleming, Councilmember Joe O'Brien, IT Specialist Bill Gothmann; Councilmember Carrie Acosta, Deputy City Clerk Rich Munson. Councilmember Absent: Gary Schimniels, Councilmember Mayor Wilhite called the meeting; to order at 6:00 p.m. City Manager Mercier suggested and it was the consensus of Council to go through the clean-up items presented by staff prior to discussing the zoning map. Appendix 19-A Schedule of Permitted Uses: Mayor Wilhite asked if the kennels that already exist within City limits are going to still be permitted. Mr. McCormick said if they were legally established, they will still be allowed. Mayor Wilhite said there are four kennels within the City but she does not know if they were legal. Mr. McCormick said he does not know if they were either. He said the kennel designation was drawn up as one designation, six or more animals constitute a kennel and they are limited to the industrial zones. Council approved and thanked staff for their hard work. Appendix A Mr. McCormick said the definitions for shared access to driveways off of a right-of-way and manufactured mobile home were added. Council approved. Title 22 Mr. McCormick said the concurreney order was changed in 2220 per direction of Council. In the outdoor lighting section on page 15, he said number 4 was changed so that no light extends beyond the boundary line of incompatible uses. He also said they added "or and to the public right-of-way" as Council suggested. Mr. McCormick said they made housekeeping changes to table 22.70-2 to clarify the uses and classifications. Staff added 6c on page 26 regarding overhead power lines and the types of street tree species to use. He said they will also consult with local tree professionals to get their recommendations as to the appropriate trees to use under overhead lines. Mr. McCormick said on page 39, staff clarified the language in the section on billboards and reinserted language in section d that was in the original draft. He said they still need to re-insert the word "not" where it was mistakenly taken out of section a. Council Minutes: 9-05-2007 Page i of7 Approved by Council: DRAFT Mr. McCormick clarified that on the last page he checked with Public Works staff regarding the language in subsection b that the City would maintain the structures. Fie said the structures referred to are not swales, but drywells and the hard infrastructure that is a part of that. Title 20 City Attorney Connelly said he went through the items addressed in the Witherspoon.. Kelley, Davenport and Toole letter dated May 25, 2007 and gave Council the legal impact of his proposals. He said the City's ordinance as written is legal and that the changes Dullanty proposed are somewhat significant changes that would alter the intent of the statute in terms of creating lots within binding site plans. He said they propose filing one binding site plan and then later they would have the ability to file records of survey with the director at subsequent points in time creating lots within that general binding site plan. He said this is the main "big picture" change and it would require a policy change in how the City processes their binding site plan proposals. Mr. Connelly said number 2 in the letter is probably ok and he said he thinks it clarifies the existing law. Asir. Connelly said number 3 segregates binding site plans from short plats and plats because of the requirements under the current code to file a final document with the accessor showing the lots that have been created, so this would also be a change in the overall processing of binding site plans. Mr. Connelly said lie thinks number 4 is not troubling, as Dullanty suggests, and thinks that what is referenced is actually fine. Mr. Connelly said number 5 is a good idea: adding the words "and for which written standards and policies have been adopted." Mr. Connelly said number 6 addresses taking out "binding site plan" throughout section .020 which is consistent in the overall policy change Dullanty requests. !`fir. Connelly said lie does not know the industry standard in regard to number 7 and is not able to respond or advise at this point. He said number 8 refers to 20.30.030 and indicates the words "and binding site plans" should be included Mr. Connelly said he agrees. Mr. Connelly said he thinks numbers 9 and 10 are the proposed policy procedures for a record of survey process. Mr. Connelly said the only other legal factor is that we are late in the game and this is a significant revision and a lengthy change. Nlayor Wilhite asked when the Council opened the record. City Manager Mercier said the record was re-opened three weeks ago.. August 28, 2007; so Council could consider all comments. Counc.ilmember Gothmann asked if these changes were incorporated into the present code, could the City be required by the court to go back and start over. Mr. Connelly said if Council makes significant changes, they need to go back through the process. Deputy Mayor Taylor asked if we are doing this right without knowing what other jurisdictions are doing and what Washington industry standards are if this is what the statute 58.17 intended. Mr. Connelly said statue gives flexibility to go either way. He said his concern is that they don't have the other jurisdictional information, they haven't had input from the Planning Commission on this and it is a substantial change. This was not submitted until long after the Planning Commission and Council both dealt with the subdivision ordinance, after the public hearing was closed on Title 20. The Planning Commission and council finished title 20 in January and this letter was submitted in May after the record was closed. COLInCil Mimics: 4-05-2007 Page 2 of 7 Approvcd byGouncil: DRAFT Deputy Mayor Taylor asked if we want to have our policy require going through the platting process to subdivide. Mr. McCormick said the binding site plan process is administrative and it does not require a public hearing. Councilmember Denenny asked if there are any concurrency concerns because some of the uses could change within the plats changing. Mr. McCormick said it can create some problems and would be looked at on a case.-by-case basis. He said they generally look at concurrency concerns at the time of platting. Councilmember Denenny asked what the difference would be then between that and going to a record of survey system. Mr. McCormick said there probably is no difference because binding site plans are only used for non-residential land; they are only for commercial industrial land. Councilmember Munson asked and it was confined by Mr. Connelly that the UDC can be amended at a later date. Mr. Munson proposed they pass it now as it is then discuss Title 20 at a later date and propose a revision rather than tying up the process now. Deputy Mayor Taylor asked if this is a different process than the City is currently using now. Mr. McCormick said it is different and that he does not know what the County's new subdivision ordinance provides because they have just gone through a revision and he does not know to what extent they have modified it. Mr. Connelly said the statute requires that the City's public participation be early and continuous and that the County had an entire Comprehensive Plan revision thrown out because they made some significant changes without going through the public hearing process. He cautioned that Council is running out of time to make such changes. Councilmember DeVleming said he agrees with Councilmember Munson, but he would like to change the items on the list in the letter that Mr. Connelly thinks they can change now without causvig concern. Mr. Connelly said Council can change number 2 on the list regarding section 20.10.025 item number 3; 1 and item 5 on the list regarding written standards. Regarding number 7 on the letter, Mr. Connelly said he cannot advise. Mr. McCormick said two-foot intervals for topographical studies may be too much and ten-foot intervals wouldn't give a lot of information; however, five foot intervals might be a good compromise because that would provide some idea of the slope of a particular site. He said ten-foot intervals do not give enough detail to aid in any review. Councilmember DeVleming he said would like to wait to see what the industry standard is before addressing this issue. Mr. Connelly deferred to Mr. McCormick for number 8 on the list regarding adding "and binding site plan" to the 30-day review process. Mr. McConnick said lie doesn't believe it is state law to require the review of binding site plans within 30 days and lie said he doesn't want to tie staff to that timeline if it is not required by law. Council said they .vill not make any changes to that until they can have further review. Deputy Mayor Taylor said Council doesn't know what has been changed and he said it is important that they know. He said they passed Title 20 that made changes to how they were doing things. Deputy Mayor Taylor asked that staff provide clarifying information to Council and that Council consider it within the next f6v months rather than letting it sit for up to a year before they make their amendments. Councilmember Gothmann suggested they refer the entire document back to the Planning Commission and have them consider it as a revision to the plan and have legal go through the legality of the issues presented, but that we pass the code first, Deputy Mayor Taylor said we need to give it to staff to make recommendations to the Planning Commission; to then give their recommendations back to Council. Mr. McCormick said staff currently has a series of comp plan amendments and it will take the Planning Commission several months to work through those changes. Councilmember Munson said he is _i concerned that the City process be in line with the County and the state so that it is more streamlined and Council Minutes: 9-05-2007 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT consistent. M.r. Kuhta said the deadline for the Comprehensive Plan amendments was last spring according to the municipal code adopted by Council. He said they extended the deadline to receive applications at the end of November of last year to be completed by May. City Manager Mercier recommended Council work with the Planning Commission to deal with the current comp plan amendments before having them take on further additional changes. Mr. McCormick said realistically they only get a couple binding site plans a year so there are not very many. Mayor Wilhite said they need to direct this back to the Planning Commission for a revision. She said Council may need to talk to the Planning Commission regarding their timeline. As a first priority they need to address the amendment someone has been waiting for and then deal with Title 20 as well as the airport overlay. She said she wants to ensure the Planning Commission has enough time to discuss it but would also like to encourage them to move along and provide a recommendation to Council. It wos the ccnsetisrts of Council to make the changes to iterrls 2 and 5 in the letter as indicated above. Mayor Wilhite called for a break at 7:07 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 7:12 p.m. Title. 19 Mr. McCormick said where it refers to the "zoning administrator" it should read the "director." He will make the changes. Councilmember DeVleming said he has concerns with elderly care and daycare home businesses. Mr. Connelly said state law considers therm both as a residence and they are regulated by the City's ordinance if they are not regulated by the state. Councilmember DeVleming asked what rules regulate daycares, assisted living facilities, and half-way houses. Mr. Connelly said he thinks they are all defined in the matrix.. COUI761,member DeVleming asked who decides how many employees a daycare can have. Mr. Connelly said that is regulated by state law. Councilmember Denemry said the City determines where they can be located and it is specified in our matrix. Councilmember DeVleming asked where parking of these employees is addressed. Mr. Connelly said it is addressed in our parking ordinance. Deputy Mayor "Taylor said he agrees with the letter from Len Bouge that addresses section 19.40.020, page 6, regarding residential standards. He said he thinks by taking the R-1 down to 25,000 feet they will have less rezone requests and he proposed that Council reduce the R-I zone to 25,000 feet. Mayor Wilhite said in looking; at the Ponderosa lots and how they could be subdivided; her concern is how to get roads to a subdivided property. She said if the property already has street access bordered on both sides, they could possibly subdivide that property because they would have street access. Senior Planner Kuhta said lie thinks the reason they didn't allow that originally was because it could get messy to create various exceptions in the minimum lot size. Councilmember Cotlunann said he doesn't agree with creating exceptions and that the Ponderosa residents have been very expressive in keeping their acre-sized lots. Mayor Wilhite proposed allowing only corner lots 1:0 subdivide, given a specified minimum number of feet. Mr. Connelly said he thought that would be very difficult to try to do. Councilmember DeVleming asked if there is any way to address that particular need. Mr. Kuhta said they could create a zone that allows for 25,000 square foot lots. He said they need to make a decision on a minimum lot size for the Ponderosa and then stick to it. Deputy Mayor Taylor said his proposal is to accommodate a situation that has come up on this issue. He said the Ponderosa neighborhood is within an urban zone and they can still maintain the character of the neighborhood but also give flexibility to those who want to subdivide. Councilmember Munson said he is in favor of leaving the table as it is. Councilmember DeVleming said he is still undecided. Councilmember Denenny said to leave it as it is. jkfayor Wilhite agreed. Majority was 4-2 to leave the table as it is. Council Minutcs: 9-05-2007 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: DRAFT Zoning Map Councilmember DcVleming asked what has changed from the Comprehensive Plan map and changes. Deputy Mayor Taylor said the Comprehensive Plan specifies land use designations and what the zoning map deals with is where the zones are placed, specifically dealing with the low-density residential zones. Senior Planner Kuhta said the zoning map from the Planning Commission recommendations is a straight cross-over except the Office and low density residential zones. He said the only discretion and difficulty with developing the zoning map was with low density residential zones, shown in yellow. He also pointed out the dark blue section as the big office zones, such as a hospital or larger scale office. He said the Garden Office zone transitions to residential neighborhoods. As a historical reference, Mr. Kuhta said staff produced a map that had dark yellow designating the R-3 zone at 7,500 square feel; and they proposed it that way because staff didn't feel it would greatly impact the existing platted areas because they were already developed as the larger lots. He also said they thought a 7,500 square foot lot was a good urban-sized lot and that it allows for in-fill development in the areas where there is opportunity for that. Councilmember Denenny said he thought that as Council went through the PRD criteria and put restrictions into place, they still wanted to have the flexibility for a smaller lot size similar to the PR.D without having to go through the PR.D process in a particularly zoned area. Deputy Mayor 'T'aylor said in terms of reducing the use of PRDs and having this zoning standardized in the subdivision ordinance, it eliminates people having to go to PRDs as a rezone request. Mr. Kuhta said the Planning Commission was concerned that the staff proposal was zoning too much of the valley as higher density development in the low density areas. They directed staff to produce a map that took them back to the minimum 10,000 square foot lot sizes. He said staff produced another map and gave it back to die Plannvno Commission indicating that most of the sough valley would remain 10,000 square foot lots as they were already platted and developed. The Planning Commission, he said, in particular Dave Crosby and Marcia Sands; said they were overdoing it now with the 10,000 square foot lots and went through die map again throughout the Valley and looked at areas for potential redevelopment. Me said they looked at 7,500 square foot lot zoning north of Sprague and north of Trent up to Greenacres because. Greenacres went through (lie rezone process to get UR-3.5 zoning they said tile.), wtuited to maintain that neighborhood as 10,000 square foot lot sizes. Fie said south of Mission would be R-3 for redevelopment potential. Councilmember Munson asked if the Greenacres area would be rips; for development with the exception of lots along the river. Cauncilme.mber DeVleming said that is a logical area for grova,th. Councilmember Denenny said he agrees that when you have good planning, neighborhoods look very nice and do not look cramped on 6,000 square foot lots such as those south of Mission on Indiana. Deputy Mayor Taylor said he doesn't believe that area is developed at 6,000 square feet; he said they are likely closer to 7,500 or 8;000 square foot. lots. Councilmember Denenny said when an undeveloped area gets developed, the less houses put into that area, the faster another rural or agricultural area will need to be developed because by using more land for less houses they will eventually need to enlarge the UGA. Councilmember Munson proposed they go with R-3 zoning in the light yellow areas on the map. Deputy Mayor Taylor proposed they push the R-3 yellow boundary up to Montgomery. Councilmember Munson agreed that is a good compromise. Councilmember Gothmann said he agrees with the proposal of the Planning Commission as presented. Councilmember DeVleniing proposed they move .R-3 zoning up to Maxwell and leave the areas along the river in their present zoning. City Attorney Connelly asked that if Council makes changes to the Plarming Commission proposal, that they work with staff to tie it back to the Comprehensive Plan and ensure they fulfill the goals of the Comprehensive Finn so we are able to defend the changes. Deputy Mayor Taylor commented that. the process for the Planning Commission Council Minutes: 9.05-2007 Page 5 of 7 APpioved by Council; DRAFT decisions for recommendations seems easier than the process for Council. Mr. Connelly said it is easier because they are making recommendations based on public hearings and the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan, whereas Council has to make a decision that is defendable in court so they need to have a clear record and basis. Mr. McCormick said the Comprehensive Plan goals under LUG- I. and LUG-2 are the two main goals that deal with low density residential zoning. Mr. Kuhta said the Planning Commission struggled with the idea of maintaining the neighborhood character of various areas, including Greenacres. However, he said the Greenacres neighborhood character is semi-rural and it will change under this Comprehensive Plan, so the question becomes how to develop that area and still maintain some semblance of neighborhood character. Depute Mayor Taylor said that page 1 of the Housing chapter states a goal is to reduce inappropriate conversion of land into sprawling low density development. Mayor Wilhite asked Mr. Connelly, and he confirmed that would qualify as a finding. Councilmember Munson asked if this will change the re-zone in Greenacres after they went through the process of getting the neighborhood rezoned. Deputy Mayor Taylor said lie thought their rezone was temporary until Council finished the Comprehensive Plan and the development: regulations. He said nothing is permanent because they hadn't. gone through the Comprehensive Plan yet. Councilmember Gothmann said that area is semi-rural and he thinks the best way to proceed is to develop it as low density, thereby impacting the neighborhood the least. Councilmember Denenny said in trying to keep the area rural, he doesn't see a difference in having four houses per acre or six houses per acre and lie said he thinks having six houses per acre is a better use for the land available there. Councilmember DeVleming asked if they were ready to make a decision. Deputy Agayor Taylor said to provide a natural buffer along the river and the established lots and to also provide snore opportunity for in-fill and development of the w7platted areas, he proposed they include as R-3 zoning the area between alission up to Mbntgoinety, bordering Rivertvav along the east, following River►vay south to Barker and on the west side go to Flora or to the river. Councilmember Munson said lie thinks what they are trying to do is have a balance: of interest by both preserving the character of the part of the area that has been developed, and balancing that with the needs for population expansion. Councilmember DeVleming said they will move everything up to t:he R-3 `none except lots adjacent to the water. Deputy Mayor Taylor said his reasoning is because this would provide a greater transition between esuiblished one-acre lots along there and provide a better buffer from the natural area. Councilmember Munson asked if they would leave the western side along the river at 7,500 square feet. Deputy Mayor Taylor confirmed and said this would be for consistency. Mayor Wilhite proposed they leave the corner section out because it is along the Centennial Trail. Councilman Gothmann said he did not agree with the rest of Council on these proposals. It was the consensus of Council to snake the changes as proposed by Deputy lllojor Taylor, but amended to exclude the earner section as suggested by !Mayor Wilhite. (See snap attached to hard-copy minutes). Mr. McCormick questioned if they were proposing to change the area zoned R4 within that section to R- 3 as well. Deputy ]Mayor Taylor said tie was not because that area is already built out at R-4. Deputy Mayor Taylor said his other suggestion involves the area along l l`s and Pierce; most of that area is fully developed. He said north of 16th there is potential for in-fill development from larger farm lots where they had large open tracts of vacant land, and south of 16'h was developed because they had open tracts. He proposed to be consistent with the north side of Sprague they convert the R-2 sections north of 16th to R-3 up to Sprague or 4d' Avenue from Sullivan to University. Councilmember Gothmann asked if most of that area had been developed at 10,000 square foot lots, such as between Bowdish and University or Pines and Evergreen. He said to be consistent, they should develop the areas as they had been in the past. Deputy Mayor Taylor said there are smatterings of 114 throughout that area and said PRDs had been used to create higher density and not to create innovative development. Councilmember Munson said he would consider 12"' Avenue to Sprague but said he doesn't agree they should extend all the way to 10, Councilmember Gothmann said the standard in that area is 10,000 square foot lots. Deputy Mayor Taylor Council Minutes: 9-05-2007 Page 6 of 7 Appmvca by Council: DRAFT disagreed. Couneilmember Munson said PhDs could still go into that area. Deputy Mayor Taylor said they have made it very difficult to put in PRDs with the regulations they are adopting. He said it is not just about expanding urban growth areas and controlling sprawl, but also to make the best use of the land available. Mr. Kuhta provided a map showing existing lots currently less than 10,000 square feet and a larger map that shows existing lots at 15,000 square feet that could be divided in half, so providing for two 7,500 square foot lots to show the potential opportunity for in-fill development. Councilmember Munson said he still feels going only to 12t1' would capture a vast majority of development potential. Couneilmember DeVlem.ing said there is also a lot of possibility for development between 12'b and 16'h. Councilmember Munson said that decision may be for another day. Deputy Mayor Taylor in tying back to the goals of the Comprehensive Plan, said the proposal would preserve the neighborhoods, accommodate the right number of housing, ensure they have adequate capital facilities and are able to pay for them, encourage public transportation, and create a higher dense urban core around the city center. He said they have more than one goal they are trying to accommodate. Councilmember Munson said in looking at redevelopment and what is right for redevelopment of an area, the area north of 12'h has older homes whereas the area south of 12"' has newer developments that are not going to redevelop for probably 20 years. He said in encouraging redevelopment with new housuig stock he thinks going only to 12`' makes sense. Deputy Mayor Taylor proposed, and it was the consensus of Council to change the R-2 designations within the area bordered by University and Sullivan, 16`t and ,Sprague to R-3, leaving anything designated other than R-2 as it is. Mayor Wi hite and Councilmembers DeVleming, and Denenny agreed. Councilmembers Munson and Gothmann disagreed. Deputy Mayor Taylor then specified justifications and findings referenced in the land-use, housing, public transportation, utilities, fire department and school, and capital facilities chapter. Mayor Wilhite asked if asked if there were any other changes to the map. Nothing further was offered. Mayor Wilhite clarified there will not be a special meeting on Monday, September 10. She reminded Council of the Public Hearing on Tuesday, September 11 in Council Chambers. Mr. Kuhta said he will try to get the map revised for the public to view as soon as possible. The meeting adjourned at 8:37 p.m. Diana Wilhite, Mayor ATTEST: Carrie Acosta, Deputy City Clerk Council Minutes: 9-05-2007 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council; DRAf71' MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting 1:30 p.m. Friday, September 7, 2007 Attendance: Couneilmembers: Staff: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor; Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Rich Munson, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Absent: Dick Denenny, Councilmember Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. and asked City Clerk Bainbridge to call roll. All councilmembers were present except Councilmembers Denenny and DeVleming. It was moved by Councilmember Munson, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember DeVleming from the meeting. Councilmember Munson mentioned that Councilmember Denenny might be attending but arriving late. Mayor Wilhite indicated that if Councilmember Denenny arrived after the final motion, he would be excused from the meeting as well. .[dote: Councilmember Denenny arrived after the meeting was adjourned.) 1. Proposed Ordinance 07-013 Extending the UR-1 Interim Zoning- Mike Connelly City Attorney Connelly explained the history of the interim UR-1 -none and of the need to pass an extension as the previous extension ended yesterday; and said that this is identical to previous ordinances except this declares an emergency and would be effective immediately. It was moved by Councilmember Munson and seconded, to suspend the rules and adopt ordinance 07-0.13. After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. It +vas moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 1:35 p.m. AT'I'BST: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Minutes Special ,Meeting UR.-1 Extension: 09-07-07 Page I of 1 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting l - Tuesday, September .l 1, 2007 Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.n., and welcomed everyone to the 123 4 meeting. Attendance: Cron Staff Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Mina Regor, Deputy Cite Manager Dick Denenny, Councilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Ken `l°hompson, Finance. Director Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Rich Munson, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCA`T'ION: Pastor Al Hulten of the Valley Assembly gave the invocation. FLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Wilhite led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Couneilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy rlgayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the amended agenda. 7RODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: Councilmember Schimmels: no report Councilmember Denenny: said he attended a Core Meeting for redevelopment; and that lie and Councilmember Munson will attend an STA (Spokane Transit Authority) Seminar tomorrow;. Depu Mayor Taylor: reported that lie attended the Washington Housing Conference this week, and today attended the Affordable Homeovoiership Task Force )`Meeting. Councilmember Gothniami: said lie participated in the Edgeclift clean-up, which resulted in an estimated 20 large boxes of trash; that lie also attended the Washington Housing Conference where there were numerous housing providers from the supply end, but little from the "demand" end. Councilmember Munson: reported that lie chaired the STA Operations Committee meeting where they continue to examine ways to wisely invest funds to increase ridership, they are also examining possible new routes and new equipment; and that lie participated in the Streamlined Sales Tax conference call yesterday. Councilmember DeVlemin~: no report. COMIY.Wl`EE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: nla MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Wilhite reported that she also attended the Affordable Housing Conference. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Wilhite invited general public comments. Chuck Hafiier. 4710 S Woodruff. he extended his thanks to Council for their time, work and hours put in on the debate on the Uniform Development Code which is soon coming to conclusion. Mayor Wilhite invited further comments; no comments were offered. Council Regular Meeting: 09-11-07 Page 1 of 9 Approved: w .r. 1. PUBLIC IM- ARING: Uniform Development Code - Greg McCormick a. Mayor Wilhite asked Attorney Connelly to be tonight's time keeper for this hearing; and she mentioned that. people may speak three minutes, and that tonight they will not be able to "give their minutes" to other speakers. Mayor Wilhite opened the public hearing at 6:16 p.m. 6` iGlOtiun Cin"sideration : haiver,'of ftules'Regardi~ig- Public "Comment fort ~endalteni'" Mayor Wilhite explained that Council normally opens the floor for public comment after each action item, but that due to tonight's public hearing, and to keep everything on this record in one area, that she will seek a motion to waive the rules and not have public comment after tonight's agenda item 46, which is the first reading of the ordinance to adopt the entire Uniform Development Code. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor, seconded and arrtanimously agreed to tivaive the rules regarding public comment for agenda item :U6 for ordinance 07-015 regarding adoption of the UDC. Councilmember Munson asked and received confirmation from City Attorney Connelly; that there will be public comment after the second reading of the ordinance, which is scheduled for September 25, 2007. cn`.Con§ tderattan fxtendirio l7eadlin e fo r;Cnuncilan lZeceive.lrDC_ W rittcn Conineiitsto L4d daj;.S4t» bcr L_4'-20.U7 D It was moved by Councilmember Gothrnann, seconded and tntanhnously agreed to extend the deadline for Council to receive UDC Written comments, to 5 p.m. Monday, September 24, 2007. Mayor Wilhite explained that this extension will give people an opportunity to submit their written comments for Council's review prior to the final reading of the ordinance to adopt the iIDC. Mayor Wilhite invited public comments on the Uniform Development Code. 1. Loyd Peterson, 3001 N Joel Court: spoke about impact fees regarding high density development and the cost of schools caused by that development; that the UR7* in his area will have 35 sites; which means there will be the need for a ne,%v school in a few years; that he thinks there should be a sufficient impact fee charged against the developer and that a study be conducted to develop the proper fee. 2 John Miller E 5517 Bernhill Road Colbert Wa. Pinecroft Business Park Manager; he thanked Council for their work; and said he is submitting suggested specific language regarding Appendix 19A and other parts of the UDC; but in particular he mentioned performance based zoning applications; he said that he has since heard that Council will consider that in the future; and said that after this process is completed, he hopes Council will consider some method for reviewing these in future, whether every six months, or annually, or by another method. 3. Madeline Phelps. 3807 \N Edgerton Road: she explained that she lives east of Felts Field, a block from the end of it; and she is opposed to a 2.5 acre lot for houses; that she doesn't think there are many 2.5 acre lots in that area; that she has a big lot but not 2.5 acres; her lot has a 200' frontage and she doesn't intend to divide the lot further; but she. is concerned about 2.5 acres; she said she has lived there for numerous years and there has never been a plane crash and that the area is very safe. 4. Don Manfred. 3311 W Packmuele Lane, Deer Park: discussed the Permit Use Matrix and the office designation; said he sent a letter last Nlarch concerning this and putting showrooms in the office designation; that his business is an interior design business and approximately two-thirds of the office is showrooms, that it is a low impact business; and there other businesses similar to his, like the affordable custom cabinets business which makes their cabinets off-site, or the Steinway Piano Gallery that wants to put in a showroom, and that now their only option is to go in a commercial zone. 5. Ron Oman, 4337 S Farr Road: stated that his neighborhood is established with one acre lots or more; and that needs to be retained in the Uniform Development Code; he spoke of several reasons why there has been a lack of citizen participation during this action and the Comprehensive Plan, such as people's extremely busy lives; he mentioned he is anticipating approval of the 40,000 square foot zoning for Council Regular Meeting: 09-1 1-07 Page 2 of 9 Approved: DRAFT Ponderosa and Rotchford and that this would meet the expectations of the majority of the populations on those areas; and he asked Council to pay attention to the community and respect their neighborhoods. 6. Van Spradley. 9518 E 44't' Avenue: said to force established neighborhoods to fragment into a density that destroys the existing character in the name of supplying affordable housing, is not fair; said that those who support density are the developers and selfish interest groups; and that there are other areas that can be developed without destroying established neighborhoods. 7. Pete. Miller, 18124 E Mission: said she listened to tapes of last Wednesday's meeting regarding title 20; that they chose wisely to keep the 40,000 square foot lots in the Ponderosa; but Greenacres is a different story; that the Planning Commission felt the Greenacres community was entitled to keep the change they paid for in the zone change from UR.7" to UR 3.5; and she said that the tape has Mr. Taylor stating the rezone was only temporary; that she also heard on the tape that mentioned from Council that the area is ripe for re-development and that two councilmembers were joking in the background about that; that maintenance of the area is not very high; and that residents in the area are not. visualizing the difference between four or six homes per acre; and that Mr. Taylor said the he recommended the zoning changes based on a lack of citizen input, although she reported that Mfr. Gothmann said there were 700 comments supporting the 10,000 square foot zone; and she asked that Council not create or go in search of a regulation to deprive North Greenacres of the 10,000 square foot zoning recommendation. 8. Ericka Johnson, 17112 E Baldwin: explained that she tried to get a group of her peers together to attend today, that they all agreed they don't like it; they don't want to be stuck with it, but all said why go because no one would listen as the decision has already been made; she said that neighbors put together dollars to keep the neighborhood the way it is but to no avail; and she asked Council to consider the neighbors' feeling about what they want. 9. Kimberly Rasa. 12819E 11`": stated that she has worked for a low income housing developer downtown with about 500 affordable units; that she'd be proud to be someone's neighbor as she takes good care of the property; she's also a homeowner living on a one-third acre, a single mom, and that she has worked hard to maintain the look and feel of her neighborhood, and she asks council to be conscious of all opinions. 10. Ruth Mattox, 917 N Burns Road: said that three years ago, there were eight acres behind them that was going to be re-zoned for multi-housing; and that the neighbors gathered 200 signatures and council kept the zoning to single housing, but with the new zoning issue, she sees that eight acres going from four houses per acre to more than 30 houses behind them; and she said she wants to protect what they bought into, and asked Council for consideration. 11. Alice Beattie 17324 E Montgomery, stated that she is against the rezoning, area-wide of the Greenacres area from the North Greenacres; that Council has been playing with this for years now and that it is exhausting; she said that Mary Pollard carried the banner for a lot of them, and many feel the waffling has to stop; that the area started with one acre, then 3.5, then 7.5, or 6.5 then back to 3.5 and that that is waffling without consideration of an established neighborhood; that she understands the need for lows income housing and they want to be good neighbors, but they bought into the dream, and if they wanted to live in a high density area they would have moved into the proper area. She said that "toe- tapping" with developers brings money but brings disgrace as well, and she asked Council to keep this neighborhood; and make the newer areas the more dense areas. 12. Dave Olson, 8808 E 44t1' Avenue: he. asked Council to maintain the one-acre lots in established neighborhoods and not go to four lots as stated in the August 18 newspaper article; he said that infill is just a buzz-word for filing vacant land for the purpose of meeting state requirements, but it impacts an established neighborhood; and that we can expect problems if this infilling occurs, such problems as temporary service outages; soil erosion and the potential for flooded basements; noise from working Council Regular Meeting: 09-11-07 Page 3 of9 Approved: DRAFT machinery; and an increased cost to the taxpayer who will be paying for the infrastructure changes; and lie asked Council not to destroy those areas of the City. 13. Jayne. (-louse., 17406 L Montgome1y. N Greenacres: she said the character of their neighborhood has ~ changed; that they own four properties with about 13 acres in total, and she would like to request 6,500 square foot lots. 14. Nlancv Purcell. 2531 S Adams Road: she said that Councilmembers were elected to represent the best interests of the constituents; that Council is currently working on legislation that will determine the future of Spokane Valley; and she asked Council to consider the affect decisions will have on homeowners; and that it is not fair to the majority of the neighbors to change the character of the area for one developer; that overbuilding will have an affect on schools resulting in over-crowing; and over-taxing the sewers will also have an affect on the quality of the river; she asked where will the tax dollars come from for all the infrastructure and added services such as tire; and she mentioned that"she has a petition signed by her neighbors to restore the former zoning. IS. Brie 1-louse, 1711 y Flora Road: he explained that he is a residential new construction specialist and has been for numerous years; that he works with a wide-array of new home purchasers; and there are people who choose to live in higher density areas as they want smaller lots as they require less maintenance; that the majority of people are busy and don't want to create more maintenance for their homes; and they want to enjoy their time off; and having 10,000 square foot lots will create higher lot prices and the majority of people won't be able to afford the homes. 16. Alden Sherrodd, 17315 r Montgomery: he said that Council has been aggravating resident land owners as they have struggled to have the area zoned for 10,000 square feet instead of the trailer park IfR7; that they told Council their wishes and Council put them off or placed blame on GMA or elsewhere; he said that the Planning Commission advised to zone the area 4.5, or whatever it is, but some councilmembers appear to be true to developers, and that the existing large lots are "ripe plums ready to be picked." He said that not everyone should live in apartment size houses; he wants the elbow room; and economical homes is an excuse for the 6500 square feet: and that small lot size means higher prices for developers that most councilmembers receive money from. He said Council should accept the Planning Commission recommendations and zone for the 10,000 square foot lots; and that Council needs to show who they work for: the people or the developers. 17. Gres, Doering, F 1105 Sunv_iew Circle: explained that he bought property neat to Felts field with the intent to subdivide; that he went to all the City department and paid the appropriate fees to plat property: and that he got a letter last July that he completed the mission and all was ready to go and he heard nothing since then until a letter from an attorney indicating that if he wants to complete the plat he can, but he can't build on it; lie said he out thousands of dollars and that he Nvas led to believe he could develop and is now told he can't. He said a deadline date should have been sent to those in process to develop and complete; that he followed all the rules and can't more on; and that there needs to be a cut- off date 18. An Britton, 18812 Luclid: said he wanted to reiterate what he said before, that he has a good size lot; he lives close to Gary; and he agrees with what has been mentioned tonight about this mess tonight; that he doesn't know why the west side stuck us with GNM and why we have to live by Seattle rules; and that he bought the lot lie did because he wants the space. 19. Richard Harmon, t7610 E Mission: he said that so far, 15 out of the 18 people who spoke tonight are mad at council because Council is trying to change the zoning, and most of those are from the Greenacres area; that he [previously] went out and got signatures to change the zoning, and about 70% of the people signed; that he collected money and thought it was a done deal; but now he finds out it's not and that Council is trying to change the zoning again; and he said lie wonders why Council doesn't understand Council Regular Meeting: 09-11-07 Page h of 9 Approved: DRAFT what people who live here want, and that they don't want developers to come in and make money on their property, and changing the zoning out there will get everybody upset. 20. Joyce ICristensen. 9322 B Boone: she stated that she is in favor of small lots, and especially the 6500 square foot lots; that keeping a large lot well maintained is a lot of expense and hard on the environment; and there are lots of retired people, or couples who both work; and she has been almost forced to move as the maintenance is difficult to keep up. 21. Janice Cooperstein. 9716 E 45'h Avenue: she said that there was a previous request to Council to maintain the one-acre lots in Ponderosa; that the fire access roads there now are inadequate for an urban wildfire area; and in the recent hearing examiner decision, the Hearing Examiner deemed the roads were adequate; but that even though there was a traffic engineer report, it couldn't be read by anyone except a qualified traffic engineer; that the study showed that only about one-third of the neighborhood could be evacuated in thirty minutes and only under very optimist conditions; and she asked Council to keep that in mind with the additional 130 homes; and she said there is no evidence the roads are adequate. 22 Dwight Hume. Land Use Consultant, 9101 \i Mt View Lane: he said that the zoning code is more than just density issues; he suggested adjustment in the use matrix categories and said he will provide additional written comments to this request prior to extended deadline; that he wants auto wrecking yards allowed in light industrial zones as well as other similar uses; grid he encouraged Council to re-visit that letter; he also suggested to amend the section dealing with vocational and trade school to allow that in the garden office category, and he gave Phoenix University as an example as they would like to expand that facility; he said that also the market trend is changing to allow on a limited basis, exercise and gym facilities in commercial areas. 23. Kathy Tabbert. 15505 E 4t° Avenue: she said she has a busy life and can't always attend Council l meetings; and that it is distracting for Council to have their laptops up; that she has a 2.5 acre lot with a nice house but changing that to high.density now puts her autistic son in danger; and now Council is planning to do that in the rest of the city; she said this is only place where people can bring in money and have zoning changed; that when her kids graduate she'll move; that Central Valley High doesn't have room for her son so she now home schools him; and that low income housing can be located elsewhere. 24. Art Sharpe, 15312 E 22r° Court: lie stated that high density is not a shroud of profit for people in the land development business; that statistics show trends concerning the average sale prices of lots and houses; and that the real estate market is changed and the medium price of homes is $196,000, and that lot prices and density are having an affect. 25. Marv Pollard. 17216 r 13aldwin Avenue, Greenacres: she said she hopes Council will be merciful: that she don't want to be enemies; that the rezone they had was a substantial change and to do this again the matter should be treated as a comp plim amendment and sent back to the Planning Commission; and that now is a poor time to put in higher density of any kind; and that there should have been a transportation analysis to show concurrency. 26. Garth Werner. 11415 E 17'h Avenue: said that he owns three businesses here and holds three licenses; that he grew up here all his life and owns property oft' Broadway and off Barker and would love to have that B2 and 33; and that it bothers him having people conducting business in the valley who don't live here; and that he understands what all the people are saying about die residential areas. 27. Dave Crosby, 10421 E Sinto: said lie is speaking as an affordable housing specialist realtor, not a developer but a realtor, and said lie is also on the Planning Commission; and said that Council needs to - look at the demographics of where we are today and where we are headed and how we'll get there; that that is the task of the UDC and the Comp plan; that the baby boomers are downsizing and that'll happen Council Regular Meeting: 09-11-07 Page 5 of 9 Approved: DRAFT in large numbers over the next five to ten years; and the generations following us will have habits we don't have and won't have. 28. Rose Dempsev, 517 N Sargent Read: said we have the opportunity to have different kinds of housing in different areas; and that everything doesn't have to look the same; and that the people in Greenacres feel strongly about this and she hopes Council will keep this in mind. 29. Dick Behm, 3626 S Ridgeview: said that things have changed a lot since he first came here: and if we keep designing neighborhoods the way we are, it will make it hard to change zoning. 30. Bob .Ladd. 17709 E Indiana: said he enjoyed his neighborhood until about three years ago; that little homes are being developed and traffic has increased with more homes and it is not safe for his grandkids to ride bikes in the neighborhood; that the lots are so small kids play in the streets; that new people move in who don't respect others in the neighborhood; and that it is distressing that it will be carte blanch for developers to come in and build six or seven homes per acre with no care or respect for the people; and he doesn't want the density changed, and said there are other places for higher density homes. Mayor Wilhite invited further comments; and no further comments were offered. City Clerk Bainbridge said that she also received a letter from Duane Halliday of Lamar Outdoor Advertising regarding cap and replace of billboards, and an e-mail from Margaret Mortz concerning low density neighborhoods. As there were no other public hearing comments, Mayor Wilhite closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m., and called for a short recess. Mayor Wilhite reconvened the meeting at 7:53 p.m. 2.1.'U-BLiC FIEtUUNG: Proposed Amended 2007 Budget - Ken Thompson Mayor Wilhite opened the public hearing at 7:54 p.m. and invited Mr. Thompson to the podium. Director Thompson explained there are three proposed budget amendments: (1) purchase the precinct building from Spokane County for $880,000; (2) set aside funds for acquisition and construction of other cities facilities for $553,000; and (3) set funds aside for replacement, repair or expansion of city facilities for $397,000. Mayor Wilhite invited comments from the public; no comments were offered and Mayor Wilhite closed the public hearing at 7:56 p.m. 3. PUBLIC HEAIUNG: Proposed Preliminary 2008 Budget- Ken Thompson Mayor Wilhite opened the public hearing at 7:57 p.m. and again welcomed Mr. Thompson to the podium. Finance Director Thompson explained that state law requires several public hearings prior to adoption of the 2008 budget; and that a subsequent hearing is scheduled for October 9, with the budget scheduled for adoption late October. Mr. Thompson also explained that sales tax revenues have increased about 1.4% from last year; and that property tax is up by about 5.6%; that state law authorizes a tax rate of $1.60 but the City rate is likely to actually be 51.55 due to increased assessed value. Ntr. Thompson also explained that anticipated expenses are $4,000,000 for civic facilities, S500,000 for records management, $397,000 for building replacement reserve, S 150,000 for an area environmental impact study for the city center; and S360,000 for business plan additions. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment, no comments were offered and Mayor Wilhite closed the public hearing at 8:04 p.m. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Following Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER firs TOTAL VOUCHER. AIb10UN'1' 08-29-2007 12599-12684 $1.570,590.91 b. Payroll for Period Ending August 31, 2007: $256,101.73 c Minutes from August 20, 2007 Council Study Session Meeting d. Minutes from August 27, 2007 Council Special Study Session Meeting e. Minutes from August 28, 2007 Council Regular Meeting i Council Regular Meeting: 09-1 1-07 Page 6 of 9 Approved: nrzA_~T f. Minutes from September 4, 2007 Special Council ;Meeting, Executive Session g. CH2MHILL Expense Approval It was moved b_y Deputy Mayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent ` Agenda. NEW BUSINESS: 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 07-014 Amending 2007 Budget - Ken Thompson After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to suspend the rules and pass Ordinance 07-014. As this item was previously covered under item 42 above, there was no additional discussion. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: Xone. Abstentions: !None. Motion carried. 6 First Reading Proposed Ordinance 07-015 Adopting Uniform Development Code (UDC) - Mike Connelly After City Clerk Bainbridge read die ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to advance ordinance 07-015 to a second reading: City Attorney Connelly explained that the purpose of this ordinance is to adopt the new Uniform Development Code; he stated that the ordinance recounts the previous ordinances created and amended dealing with the Uniform Development Code, that the UDC will now include the section dealing with the establishment and purpose of the Planning Commission; it mentions the adoption of the City's Comprehensive Plan; explains that current SVMC Title 10 will keep the Commute Trip Reduction section, and the remainder of SVMC Title 10 will be repealed; that this ordinance also adopts certain Findings of Fact, explains how the ordinance sections implements and are in compliance with SEPA requirements; that it implements the Shorelines Management Act, Considers Critical Areas and resource Lands, Housing and Employment Growth, and cites the dates of citizen participation. In response to a question from Councilmember Munson, Council will have opportunity to propose changes to this Code and he urged Council to examine the draft ordinance in detail. 1 Deputy Mayor Taylor mentioned the use of showrooms and the "office" designation, and said that Council would like to hear more on that definition at the next meeting; to which Mr. Mercier responded that. 60 minutes have been set aside for next Tuesday's study session to have further UDC discussion. Councilmember DeVleming and Deputy Mayor Taylor said that they are not pleased Nvith some parts of the Code, but are pleased with the majority of the material; and Councilmember'Munson said he wants to discuss the Greenacres zoning further at the next meeting. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried 7 Motion Consideration: City Hall Facilities Consultant Selection -Neil Kersten Councilmember Munson mentioned he has been friends with Mr. Willis for approximately thirty years, but feels that friendship will not have an affect on Mr. Munson's decision tonight. Councilmember Gothmann also disclosed that during the last days of the Housing Convention, he meet with members of GGLO to discuss the role and relationship between the architect and the overall architect, but feels that conversation would not have an affect on tonight's decision. Public Works Director Kersten then explained that staff issued an RFP for development of a City Hall facility program and that after the selection committee met and conducted interviews; the committee ranked the written proposals as follows: (1) Bernardo Willis Architects PC - GGiaO; (2) ALSC Architects; (3) Integrus Architecture; and (4) Madison Mitchell Evenson & Conrad PLLC. It was moved by Councilmember jllunson and seconded, to approve the ranking= order of the selection committee and authorize the Ciry Manager to proceed with negotiations of a contract with Bernardo i-Villis Architects PC - GGLO for the City Hall facility program and cost estimate. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. Gary..Bernardno of the Bernardo Willis team said that they are excited to be able to do this project, he mentioned his background as a Valley resident; and extended his thanks to Council for the vote of confidence. Council Regular Meetbie: 09-11-07 Page 7 of 9 Approved: DPLAFT Mr. Kersten said they anticipate this contract to be within the City Manager's authority and will move ahead as appropriate. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed.-Alone. Abstentions: None. ltlotion carried 3. Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Allocations - Ken Thompson rs---- a: -Motion Consideration::"allocated dish ibirtions.for Socials Serc=iSere=icSS Agcncies'tis follows Councilmember Gothmann explained that due-to the close association with Edgecliff, he recused himself from this motion, and lie left the room. Finance Director Thompson showed a breakdown of the six requests and of the six recommendations, one from each councilmember, excluding Mr. Gothmann. It was moved by Councilmember i4urnson, seconded, and (except for Mr, Gothmann who was recused) unanimously agreed to allocate the following grant amounts: Greater Spokane Substance Abuse: S 2,500 Spokane Valley Partners: S20,000 Big.Brotherslft Sisters: S 3,000 .Heals on 14'heels: S 4,000 Arts Council: ,S 3.000, for a total of $34,500 There were no public comments; and Mr. Gothmann returned to the dais. b Motion Consideration: allocated distributions for Economic Development Agencies as follows It was moved by.Deputy :Yavor Tcrylor, seconded and unanimously agreed to allocate the follotiving grant amounts: Greater Spokane, Inc: $65,000 ITA: S25,000 Spokane Neighborhood Eco..Dew S 4,000 Councilmember Munson mentioned the funding previously allocated for the site selector program; and Council briefly discussed possible uses of the remaining funds. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. Pam Almcdia of Meals on Wheels, mentioned that St,000 would provide meals for one person for an entire year. }aster Larson. of the Spokane County Sheriffs office. 1100 W Mallon, said she is the fiscal agent for the SCOPE Edgeeliff Weed and Seed Project which is part of Spokane Valley Partners; and she thanked Council for their consideration, and for the work involved in those neighborhoods. It was moved by Councilmember DeVletning, seconded and unanimously agreed to allocate the remaining S1,500 to 119eals on FVheels. There were no further public comments on this issue. PUBLIC COI•'IATEINTS Mayor Wilhite invited general public comment; no comments were offered. AD`'LINISTR.ATIVE REPORTS- 4a ~i:Naha~2rJC6ntmetits: City Manager 'Mercier mentioned that all documents relative to the UUC are now on the City's website. Deputy Mayor Taylor asked that when Council has the next discussion, if staff will be prepared to provide additional information concerning showrooms; and of the University of Phoenix' inability to expand because of its zoning designation. Mr. Mercier also said unless there are objections; he intends to extend the lobby contract to the same firm for another year under the same terms and conditions as the current contract; there were no objections voiced. Mr. Mercier brought Council attention to the CTED Grant 2007-2009 information and the draft letter of support requesting the Mayor's sibmature, and unless there is objection, the Mayor will sign the letter; there were no objections voiced. Mr. Mercier mentioned the single page update on animal control Council Regular Meeting: 09-11-07 Page 8 of 9 Approved: DRAFT issue which was presented at the Board of County Commissioner's meeting this morning as part of the continuing dialogue on regional animal control issues.. Mr. Mercier said he met with the Finance Committee last Friday and the Committee agreed to the idea of closing the entire day Christmas Eve, which is a Monday; and to remain open the entire day New Year's Eve; and asked if Council would be amenable to placing that on the nest consent agenda. Council concurred. Plans for the winter retreat are beginning, and Mr. Mercier asked Council to check their calendars for possible Saturday meeting dates of January 12 or February 2. We have also been asked to consider hosting a five-member international group this winter from places in the world experiencing the democratic form of government for the first time, and Mr. Mercier said this, would be an opportunity to share our governance experience with new mayors and/or staff of communities who are trying to figure this out for the first time. It was moved by Deputy Afayor Taylor, seconded and unoninnously agreed to extend the meeting to 9:10 p.m. Public Works Director Kersten mentioned that the Broadway Project three lanes was completed last fall and Council was anticipating receiving those accidents statistics this fall; however, with the Sullivan ramp overpass closed for two months, traffic was diverted down Broadway, so those traffic numbers would not be the normal traffic numbers; and he said he would like to come back in six months in order to get more viable statistics; adding that nothing more will be done to the rest of Broadway until Council has had a chance to review the statistics. Council concurred. MTORINIATION ONLY: Although the fee resolution proposed amendments; and the Appleway Avenue Bid Award were information items, Deputy Mayor Taylor said he would like to see how our fees compare with other jurisdictions. Mr. Mercier mentioned staff would be glad to comply; but had the understanding Council was more focused on cost recovery than what neighborhood jurisdictions would be charging; and Mr. Taylor said he would like to keep the fees in balance and therefore would like to see comparisons and cost recovery fee recommendations. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Land .Acquisition: there was no executive session. There being no further business, it was moved by Cotatcilmember Munsotn, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m. Diana Wilhite, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council keeular Meeting: 09-11-07 Page 9 of 9 Approved: Draft M.I1'UTES CITY OF SPOT ANTE VALLICY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION Tuesday, September 18, 2007 Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the meeting. Present: Counc.ilmembers: Staff: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney Dick Denenny, Councilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner Rich Munson, Councilmember Rick Va.nLeuven, Police Chief Gary Schimmcls, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mike Jackson, Parks Rec Director 'Neil Kcrsten, Public Works Director Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Joe O'Brien, IT Specialist Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Employee Introductions: Financc Director Thompson introduced Accountant/Budget Analyst Raba Nimri, and our second IT Specialist Joe O'Brien. Parks and Recreation Director Jackson introduced his department's new Administrative Assistant Michelle Simpson; Senior Engineer Worley introduced Engineer Tech Peter Fisch; and Planning Manager McCormick introduced Development Services Engineer 'tech Ryan Brodwater. Council welcomed and greeted the new employees. 1. Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Update - Morgan Koudelka, Aurora Crooks Senior Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that the Commute Trip Reduction Efficiency Act adopted in 2006, has been updated to require local jurisdictions that have at least one CTR-affected work site, to prepare the CTR Plans, and as such the City of Spokane Valley is required to prepare a draft Cl'R Plan. He further explained that the CTR Plan is a collection of City-adopted goals, policies and marketing strategies about how the City will work over the next four years to reduce driving-alone trips and vehicle miles traveled. Mr. Koudelka then introduced Aurora Crooks, Spokane County Transportation Demand Manager who gave a summary of the CTR plan and the plan's goals and dates for achieving those goals, and added that the Washington State Department of Transportation is responsible for the Plan's final approval, and the County will be the lead entity for the Plan's implementation. Councilmember Munson mentioned an apparent discrepancy between the Recommended Strategies to Achieve Goals, specifically "Park and :Ride Lots" and the "Example Commute Trip Reduction & Growth Mianagement Planning Policies" under Zoning, which discusses discouraging the development of major stand-alone park and ride facilities. Ms. Crooks thanked Councilmember Munson for that information and said she will research that further, to which Mr. Koudelka added that the terminology is somewhat confusing and needs to be stated clearly. 2. Department.Budget Highlights -'Moran Koudelka Mr. Koudelka explained that the purpose of this agenda item is to present each department's budget's highlights. He mentioned the Executive and Legislative Support budget goals as included on the budget document pages 34 and 35, and then Mr. Koudelka introduced Police Chief VanLeuven. Chief Meeting N4inutes:09-18-07 Page I of4 Approved by Council: Draft VanLeuven explained the public safety highlights which include enhancing the security of the police precinct building. Brief discussion ensued regarding Sheriff Office command staff briefings incorporating the five-year strategic plan, including mention that Chief VanLeuven and Mr. Mercier will be attending those County meetings to represent the City's interest. Mr. Koudelka explained the highlights of the Operations and Administrative Services, followed by Mr. Thompson's explanation of budget pages 39 through 41 which cover insurance, State Auditor's annual audit suggestions; and participation in the preparation of the Americans with Disabilities Act improvement plan. Mir. Jackson hit the Parks and Recreation highlights and added that Council will soon be receiving an update from ORB on the pool construction of optional items. Councilmember Gothmann suggested the idea of creating an umbrella Senior organisation or expanding the present Senior organization to include all seniors in the Valley and not: just those in CenterPlace; to which Mr. Mercier replied that it is his hope Council will have further discussion on that topic as Council and staff could later try to inventory who might be potential sources within the community who might want to take up that mantle. Terrace View Park and park security was also mentioned, and Mr. Jackson said fiends have been included for additional lighting in that area, as well as removing bushes and shrubbery on the west side of Valley Mission pool to further enhance security. In response to Council question about the status of the former Senior Center, Mr. Jackson mentioned that he and Mr. Worley have contracted with a firm which recently lost their engineer; thus delaying information on this topic; and that once staff has had opportunity for further research, it. is anticipated a report will be brought forward to Council soon. Mr. Jackson also mentioned there is a fundraiser this weekend at Balfour Park for that group to raise funds for their water spray park; that they might have an architect who is willing to donate their services, and after research, staff determined that we could accept donated services; and that staff continues to follow up on that topic. Planning Manager McCormick went over the slides explaining the highlights of Community Development, and mentioned the pilot program for over-the-counter permits, and said staff continues to work on a procedures manual. Public Works Director Kersten highlighted the public works goals, and explained that stormwater issues have not been completed as we currently only have one employee working on that- and also mentioned that they are working on a system to drain the liquids taken during the vactoring process prior to taking the material to the landfill, thus saving the cost of disposing the water. Finance Director Thompson went over slide 14 and mentioned that the correct terminology is "civic building replacement fund," rather than reserve fund. Mr. Koudelka completed the presentation by explaining that 2008 will be exciting as the City completes its first five years; and looks forward to many future accomplishments. Mayor Wilhite called for a recess at 7:00 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7: 10 p.m. 3. Uniform Development Code (UDC) Discussion - Greg McCormick City Attorney Connelly brought Council's attention to the red-line version of Ordinance 07-015; which has minor changes since the first reading, and suggested Council examine the ordinance prior to the second reading; and said that there will likely be other minor edits depending on any chances Council may wish to make. Mr. Connelly mentioned that the materials Council received tonight are not the complete titles, but merely those title pages which have been changed since the last iteration; and that while there are numerous technical or scrivener's changes, there are only three substantive changes: (1) section 19.30.030, page 5, letter "c". Mr. Connelly said his notes indicate that was to remain in and mentioned that without "e" there is no "teeth" to that section and we will have little basis to deny any request for raising density; (2) Title 22, section 22.20.020, the appropriate number should be 10 and not 25 peak hour trips. ft'hen asked for the rationale for this n n7ber, Mr. Connelly said he will helve a ivrltten 0nS14Tr tO COU17CH t071701-1-ow morning; and (3) section 22.150.060 and 070, page 46, that this is the technical changed proposed by the public works department per Henry Allen's September 11 Meeting Minutes: 09-18-07 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: Draft memorondum o,r Tiormwaler; and in particular, tint he maximum depth of water r:? a swage for trealment sholf be sire inches. Council again asked for rarionale for those changes and.vr. C'onnclly soil he will supp~v that as some as possible. Mr. McCormick explained that his Memorandum of September 18 deals with zoning issues as a resLL It of the September 1 I public hearing, and include4s issues concerning showrooms; trade and vocational schools, and exercisce facilities. Mr- McCormick said that trade and vocational schools are currently permitted in the Garden Office zone so no uhange is needed; that staff recommends adding exercise facility/ ym athletic club as a permitted use in the Neighborhood Commercial zone; and recommends adding showrooms to 1:he matrix as a permitted use in the mixed use center, corridor mixed use, office, cornmunity commercial, regional commercial, and light industria] Zones. i ! ?vlr. McConnic;k also mentioned that Senior Planner J uhta added a change to the showroom definition in an attcmpt to more specifically define those uses that would fall in that catcgory. Mr. Kuhta mentioned there currently exists a definition for "music stores" and that music stores are pernitted as an accessory use in garden office, bLit that he is not Certain how to classify piano sales acid would like Council comments on that topic. Discussion ensued regarding large musical instruments, to allow these "shop+rrooms'° Fis a conditioned use in office, or by special conditions, or as an aRCillary.Or secondary use; that star` wants to make sure any member of staff would know inhere to look in the code to find these types of showrooms, and not merely stop with the "music store' definition, and to ensure all the counter people interpret the terms the same- Mayor Wilhite suggested chancing the designation of the corridor in question in order to allow for these piano showrooms. Council concurred with staff 10 add the Showroom definition, The subject moved to Exercise clubs in neighborhood commercial districts; and the mention that thm ` seems to be a trend for small athicbcc clubs or exercise facilities locating in neighborhood type centers. After discussion on this lopic, including how to prevent such clubs from expanding, it was council consensgrs o adel ere showroom definition and schedule of permitted arses, and allow exercise clubs in ne ,ghborhood commercial disrricts- 193 0.030: Site Specific on in Ma Amendments Discussion was held concerning whether "c" should be, left in or deleted, and Council mentioned that they remembered that item as being deleted. [e. Property is adjacent and contiguous to property of the sanio Zoning classification requested prior to the application-] Mr. McCormick mentioned that the area rnust be contiguous or it would not meet the criteria for a rezone. Attorney Coi)neIly said we have the category low density residential in flab comprehensive plan and don't have specific guidelines to differLmtiate bp,Mrr cn .R.1, 2, ar 3 in that low deli sity residenda], and when there is an app1 ication for a zone change, the Hearirig Examiner has no criteria upon which to base a denial. Some Couneilmcmbers felt the "e" item shoLitd be delc~Wd, and others felt it should remain; there was Council discussion on what each pcrceived was the direction previously taken on this issue. and Deputy Mayor Taylor suggested striking that item. There was ulibnote Council consensus lo kowe .`e „ by and to allow corner douches and Mai adjacent and conti uous hicltrdes property across the sh•eef; and io add property of the same or higher zoni:?g clrass~~fication. - Ordinance 05-003: Greenacres area-wide rezone Discussion concerliing the previous area-wide rezone resulted in differing opinions of what was the intent of that rezone; whether that action was construed or perceived as ternporary; would a different action reverse that decislan or be perceived as CoLincil going "back on its word:" that many changes have taken place since the adoption of the City's Cornprehcnsive Plan; the difference in the actual number of homes betwc~e n a U.R 3-5 and a UR-7* zone; the number of opportLLnities for public comment on this issue; the number of areas in Crreenacres that are Imo; and that Finding fl? connected with ordinance 05-003 and item "e" discussed above in site specific nning are connected. twi"Ong Minutes: 09-18-07 Page 3 of4 Apprnved by Coun61; ? Faft 'otine ilmember Munson suggested the shaded area go back to the J0.000 square foot with fhe exception ~ of Ibings already gone Through the re-zone process, ouncilmembers SchbnweL and Crrothmann agreed. Ma' vor ilhife, Depm}+?1{layor Taylor, and Councilmembers DeWeining andDenenn disagreed; and tlius ~ the area does not revert back to the 14.000 square font lots. CouncJ Ina mber Munson thanked Council for the opportunit}, to re-discuss this issue- Other topics discussed included the P4necroft Business Park and that several of those issues brought up from Mr, Miller will be addressed in the future, Mr. McCormick stated that we need to ensure we have enongh land zoned for those uses; and said he feels we have done a good job of providing industrial land; that perhaps we need to preserve the areas like those around Mirabcau for higher-end tvpe uses; and that storage probably should noc be in the mix in that area. AIforney Connelly said he wlff b,-ing back the final version of the Ordinance with the chav?ges,- and INV 10 reiterate, Council ants to ,gee a ralionals or the change suggested by Inga Note and by Henry Aflen- 4. Advance Agenda Mayor Wil]iite mentioned planning a joint meeting with Cooncil and the Planning Commission concerning the city center. and asked Council to look at their calendars; part icularly to see if NTOVember l would work- Mr. Mercier said that they are also trying to schedule a presentation from Michael Freedman, and have tentatively set OXtobe-r 2 as the date; and Mr. Kuhta mentioned such ixkeetino cnuld last two to three hours depending on the number of questions, Mr. Mercier said that October 30 or November 1, or some Oher date later in November are all possibilities, but that: Tovernbcr 2 would not 4vork 8S a meeting date as that is the date of the employee recognition dinner- Possible dates mentioned for such a meeting With Mr. Freedman included October 30; Iovember 1; or November 20. In discussing possible retreat dates. it was determined that February coniliw with Olympia A WC f,egislativc dates, and Council agreed to schedule the wimr retreat on Saturday January 12.. Other items placed on the advance agenda's tentative list included a graffiti ordinance, assumption of private roads policy, and an animal ordinance to address animal sales and veterinarian involvUrnent in the licensing process. 5. Information Only Items- Animal ccontrol update; and C1P OrganiKational model. These items u,e.re. not discussed, 6. CcUncil' hecl1-in Deputy Mayor Taylor mentioned the i\'ationaI Lea-ue of Cities Steering Committee meets September 27 through 29 at Cente.rF[ace, ~LnJ said he also needs volunt"r van drivers, 7. City Manager Com meets- Mr. Mere ier had no further corn ments. There being nefurther business, the meeting adjourned at 8:5 0 p.n7, AI -I-EST, Diana Wilhite, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Mttling iMiri ti CCs, 09- 18 -07 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: September 25, 2007 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: N consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information D admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Interlocal Agreement Subrecipient of Homeland Security Funding GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At its August 28, 2007, Council approved a motion to accept grant moneys from Homeland Security to strengthen Spokane Valley Police Precinct Building. The attached interlocal is the agreement for that funding. BACKGROUND: J OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the "Interlocal Agreement for Subrecipient of Homeland Security Funding." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS RCA of August 21, 2007 explaining the project funding Interlocal Agreement for Subrecipient of Homeland Security Funding 6 CITY F SPOKANE. VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: August 1, 2007 City Manager Sign-off. Item: heck all that apply: Q consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ iniormation ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Homeland ecurity_grant to strengthen VPD Precinct Building PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Information item August 1, 2DQ7 13A GROUND: Several incidents of direst attack upon law enforcement and their facilities have occurred with irk the recent past (Le, Moscow and Coeur d'Alene, Jdalio), and we are vc y aware that we are vulnerable to the same type of situation- The Spokane Valley Police Department is in the process of implementing a number of security measures to enb ce, safety at our pol ice and court facilit - arious areas in the facility bave been examined and surveycJ to assess potential problem spots. Th.(1 wir)dow in front of the front desk and the umll below the window are extremely vulnerable to firearm attack. Fortification with bullet-proof glass and Rnetal shielding to the lower wall would provide deputies workiDg at the front desk with the cover needed to protect themselves and pcrfor+n duties assigned to them in an evacuation, lockdown, or sholter in place procedure- The front dell: officer is taskrd with steps that are key to protecting the T)istrict Court personnel and the pubic visiting the court facilities during any of the above emergency situations. The increased security measures outlined for thr front desk are aecessarT to allow deputies assigned there to perform their duties in a reasonably safe inEuiner. It t is of the utmost importance to deny any breacb of our police facility so that it can corntinue to serve as a command post and safe haven from which emergency operations can be directed- Our objective is to decrease the vulnerability of our building and staff to terrorist threats and Minimize the interruption of government services at our facility- Wt have applied to Homeland Security for grant moneys to fund the reinforcement of the front: desk area ' by replacing the existing window glass with bulletproof security glass and bistalling a metal proteotive shield in front of the, desk counter to provide secure cover. Curreotly, the desk only offers concearnent and provides little, if any, protection fram possible attacks. Jt is imperative that both the upper glass and lower metal shield he installed simultaneously to provide the level of protection needed in such. } emergencies. We ha-ve consulted with Allied Fire and Security of Spokane, 'Washy igton too acquire an estimate for the completion of this project, and this company would do the work involved, Home-land Security funding in the amount of $34;000.00 has been granted to pay for this project. PROJECT BIDET; TOTAL PROJECT FUNDiNO: 31,167,00 + 8.6% TAX ($2,680.36) FOR A TOTAL OF $33,847-36 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR M070N: Move to accept grant moneys from Homeland Security to strengthen Spokane Valley Police Precinct Building- BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS, Mons to the City of Spokane Valley STAFF CONTACT: Rick ianLeuverz, Chief of Police rNTERLOCA1L AC-REEMENT FOR SU RECIPIENT OF HOi1+ (LAND SU URITY FUNDJUNG THIS TNTERLO AL S LTBRE tPIENT AGREEMENT is made by and arnong Spokane County, a political subdivision cfthe State of Washington, having of#i ces for the transaction of business at 1116 West Broadway Avenue; Spokane, WashiDgton 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COL1 ;T Department of Emergency Management, having offices &r the transaction of business at 1615 N. Rebecca, Spokane Washington 99217, bereinaft r referred to as "DEPART ENT" and entities within Spokane County are herein referred to as the "SUB RECIPIENT and/or SUB- O TRA TOR." WTTNESSETH: WHERE S, The Federal Departn7em cif Homeland Security; is prodding funds to Ideal gove=ent to enhance the preparedness of the nation to combat terrorise through the State Homeland Security Grant Program (SHS Metropolitan Medical Response System (NTMIRS), the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (LETPP) and other Homeland Security Programs. 4 FEREAS, The DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT is the contractor for these local grants and entities within Spokane County have been I tIfied y as a Subrecipient (Sub Contractor) of equipment or funds received from one or more of these grants. WHEREAS, DE shall provide to a representative cf the SUBREOIPIENT (S ab- Contra ctor) receiving equipment purcbased with Federal Department of.Homeland Security funds, an equipment hand receipt that contains at tydnintuin, the Grant nurse, Contract Number, dollar amount, and the Catalog of Federal Dorne5tic Assistance (Cf))A) number. W HEREAS, DI PA-RTMENT shall provide to the SU13RE IPIENT (Sub- Contractor) the Contract Name, Contract ?Number, and OFDA Number to the SUBRE IPIERIT (Sub Contractor) when submitting for reimbursement of Homeland Security funds, WHERvEAS, pursuant to the above-cited statutory provisions, The SUB RECIPIENT (Sub-OoBtract r), entered into an Agreement entitled "UNTERLOC L AGREEMENT FOR SUBRE IPIE T OF HOMELAND SECURITY FUNDING" NOW THEREFORE for and in consideration of the mutual pronvse set forth hereinafter and as provided for in the aboe-referenced recitals, the SUB E TPTE IT i (Sub-Contractor) do hereby agree and accept the terms of this agreement and.Exhibit A, General Terms and Conditions contained herein. NOTE: There will be a separate signature page for each entity signing the agreement. INi WITNESS WHEREOF, the SUBR.ECIPIENT have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. Signatures: Thomas F. Mattern Dated Spokane DEM Dated Subrecipient (Sub Contractor) EXHIBIT A ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS: The subrecipient (sub contractor) shall comply with OMB Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Governments; OMB A-102, Grants and Cooperative Agreements with State and Local Governments; and A-1.33, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non- Profit Organizations and the Financial Management Guide U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Federal guidance will supersede any condition that is not in compliance with federal regulation. ADDITIONAL SPECIAL. CONDITIONS AND 'tNIODI- ICATION TO GENERkL CON'DIT'IONS: 1. Funds are provided by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office of Grants and Training (G&T) solely for the purpose of ei-diancing the capability of state and local units of government to prevent, deter, respond to, and recover from incidents of terrorism involving the use of CBRNE weapons and cyber attacks and/or catastrophic incident planning/response. The Contractor and Sub-Contractor must demonstrate the dual-use nature of any activities implemented under this program that are not explicitly focused on terroristn/cat,3strophic incident preparedness. The Contractor/Sub Contractor shall use the funds to perform tasks as described in the Grant Programs. Funding may not be used to replace or supplant government funding or existing planning or exercise programs. 2. The Contractor and sub contractor shall provide a match of $0 of non-federal origui. 3. CONTINGENCY LANGUAGE Contractor and Sub-Contractor acknowledges that since; this contract involves federal funding, the period of performance will likely begin prior to the availability of appropriated federal funds. Contractor and Sub-Contractor agrees that it will not hold the County, the State of Washingtotr, or the United States liable for any damages, claim for reimbursement, or any type of payment whatsoever for services performed under this contract prior to distribution of appropriated federal funds. Contractor and Sub-Contractor agrees that it will not hold the County, Department, the State of Washington, or the United States liable for any damages, claim for reimbursement or any type of payment if federal funds are not appropriated or are not appropriated in a particular amount. EQUIPI<liENT iMA.NAGEMENT: All equipment purchased under this contract, by the Contractor or a Sub-Contractor, will be recorded and maintained in an equipment inventory system. 1. Upon successful completion of the terms of this agreement, all equipment purchases through this agreement will be owned by the Contractor, or a recognized sub-contractor/sub-grantee for which a contract, sub-grant agreement, or other means of legal transfer of ownership is in place. i 2. The Contractor, or a recognized sub-contractor/sub-grantee: shall be responsible for any and all operation and maintenance expenses and for the safe operation of their equipment including all questions of liability. 3. The Contractor shall maintain equipment records that include: a description of the property; the manufacturer's serial number, model number, or other identification number, the source of the equipment, including the Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance or CFDA number; who holds title; the acquisition date; the cost of the equipment and the percentage of. Federal participation in the cost; the location., use and condition of the equipment at the date the information was reported; and disposition data including the date of disposal and sale price of the property. 4. Records for equipment shall be retained by the Contractor for a period of six years from the date of the disposition, replacement or transfer. If any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the six year period, the records shall be retained by the Contractor until all litigations, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. 5. The Contractor, Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall take a physical inventory of the equipment and reconcile the results with the property records at least once every two years. Any differences between quantities determined by the physical inspection and those shown m the records shall be investigated by the Contractor, Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor to determine the cause of the difference. The Contractor, Sub Recipient and/or Sub- Contractor shall, in connection with the inventory, verify the existence, current utilization, and continued need for the equipment. 6. The Contractor, Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall develop a control system to ensure adequate safeguards to prevent loss, damage, and theft of the property. Any loss, damage or theft shall be investigated and a report generated. 1 7. The Contractor, Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor will develop adequate maintenance procedures to keep the property in good condition. 8. If the Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor is authorized or required to sell the property, proper sales procedures must be established to ensure the highest possible return. 9. When original or replacement equipment is no longer needed for the original project or program or for other activities currently or previously supported by a Federal agency, disposition of the equipment will be made as follows: a. Items of equipment with a current per-unit fair market value of less than $5,000 may be retained, sold or otherwise disposed of by the Contractor with no further obligation to the awarding agency, b. Items of equipment with a current per-unit fair market value of more than $5,000 may be retained or sold and the Contractor, Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall compensate the Federal-sponsoring agency for its share. 10. As sub-grantees of federal funds the Contractor must pass on equipment management requirements that meet or exceed the requirements outlined above for all sub-contractors, consultants, and sub-grantees who receive pass-thru funding from these contracts. SUBRECI:PtENT MONITORING: The DEPARTMENT will monitor the activities of the Sub-recipient from award to closeout and for the life of equipment purchased under this agreement. The goal of the DEPARTMENT monitoring activities will be to ensure that agencies receiving f=ederal pass-thru funds are in compliance with federal and state audit requirements, federal grant guidance, applicable federal l ) and state financial guides, as well as OMB Circular A-133 and A-37, A-102 where applicable. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. DEFIlVITIONS As used throughout this agreement, the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below: a. "Department" (Contractor) shall mean the Spokane City/County Department of Emcrgency Management, as a county agency, any division, section, office, unit or other entity of the Department, or any of the officers or other officials lawfully representing that Department. b. "Sub-Contractor" shall mean that firm, organization, group, individual; or other entity performing services under this agreement, and shall include all employees of the Sub-Contractor. It shall include any subcontractor retained by the prime Contractor as permitted under the terms of this agreement. "Contractor" shall be fwlhcr defined as one or the other of the following and so indicated on face sheet of the contract. 1) "Subrecipient" shall mean a sub-contractor that operates a federal or state assistance program for which it receives federal funds and which has the authority to determine both the services rendered and disposition of program funds. 2) "Vendor" shall mean a contractor that agrees to provide the ainount and kind of service or activity requested by the Department and that agrees to provide goods or services to be utilized by the Department. C. "Recipient and/or Pass-Through Entity" means the Washington State Military Department as it is applied to this contract. d. "Cognizant State Agency" shall mean the state agency from which the sub- recipient receives federal financial assistance. If funds are received from more than one state agency, that state agency shall be the agency who contributes the largest portion of federal financial assistance to the sub-recipient. unless the designation has been reassigned to a different state agency by mutual agreement. C. "Subcontractor" shall mean one, not in the employment of the Contractor, who is performing all or part of those services under this agreement under a separate contract with the Contractor. The terms "subcontractor" and "subcontractors" mean subcontractor(s) in any tier. f. "Grant" - For the purposes herein, the tern "grant" may be used to mean "contracts" or "grants" or "agreements". g. "CFR" - Code of Federal Regulations h. "OMB" - Office of Management and budget i. "RCNV" - Revised Code of Washington i " WAC" - Washington Administrative Code. 2. SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING a. Spokane City/County Department of Emergency Management (the Department), as a recipient agency, receives federal financial assistance funds for federal programs and is charged with maintaining compliance with federal and state laws and regulations regarding the monitoring, documentation, and auditing of sub- recipient grant activities using federal financial assistance funds. Management i r-~ and implementation guidelines for the federal programs ensure compliance with statutes, grant guidelines, the sub-award agreement. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circulars, in particular the OMB Circular A-] 33, sub-recipient audits, and other guidance found in the Federal Register. The Department shall adhere to its Sub-recipient Monitoring Policy and the Sub-recipient Monitoring Procedures (NTW Policy number 00-025-05.) b. The Department has responsibility for reasonable and necessary monitoring of the Sub Recipient. and/or Sub Contractor performance. The Department shall conduct contract monitoring activities on a regular basis. Monitoring is defined as any planned, ongoing, or periodic activity that measures and ensures contractor compliance with the terms. conditions, and requirements of a contract. Monitoring involves prudent collection of information about Sub Recipient and/or Sub Contractor operations and is not limited to site visits or the completion of formal reviews. Monitoring may include periodic Sub-recipient and/or Sub Contractor reporting to the Department, Department review of audit reports, invoice reviews, onsite reviews and observations, and surveys. Adequate documentation is essential for effective contract monitoring and will include copies of letters, meeting notes, and records of phone conversations as evidence that conscientious monitoring has occurred daring the period of the contract. C. The Department the Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor acknowledge and agree to the following: 1) The Department as the pass-through entity (recipient) shall monitor its sub-recipients. If the Department sub-awards federal funds to a sub- recipient, then the Department staff must monitor the sub-recipient. 2) Review of the A-133 Single Audit report is a primary monitoring activity used by pass-through entities to ensure compliance. 3) Sub-recipient monitoring will occur throughout the year rather than relying solely on a once-a-year audit. 4) The Department as the pass-through entity (recipient) will conduct on- site visits as appropriate and required by contract for "for-profit" sub- recipients, since the A-133 Single audit does not apply to "for-profit" organizations. 3. RECORDS, MONITORING AND AUDIT ACCESS a. The Sub Recipient and Sub-Contractor shall cooperate with and freely participate in any monitoring or evaluation activities conducted by the Department that are pertinent to the intent of this agreement.. b. The Contractor, Sub Recipient and Sub-Contractor shall maintain books, records, documents, and other evidence and accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly reflect all direct and indirect costs of any nature expended in the performance of this agreement. These records shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review, or audit by personnel duly authorized by the Department, the Office of the State Auditor, and federal officials so authorized by law, rile, regulation, or contract. The Contractor, Sub-Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor will retain all books, records, documents, and other materials relevant to this contract for six (6) years from the end date of the grant through which this agreement is funded and make them available for inspection by persons authorized under this provision. C. The Department or the State Auditor or any of their representatives and federal officials so authorized by law, rile, reg7ulation, or contract shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours and as often as the Department or the State Auditor may deem necessary, all of the Contractor's, Sub Recipient and/or Sub-Contractor records with respect to all matters covered in this agreement. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine, and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls, and records of matters covered by this agreement. Such rights last for six (6) years from the end date of the grant through which this agreement is funded. d. The Contractor Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities conducted by the Department that are pertinent to the intent of this contract. C. If any litigation, claim, or audit is started before the expiration of the six (6) year period, the records shall be retained until all litigation, claims, or audit findings involving the records have been resolved. 4. SINGLE AUDIT ACT ItEQUIREMENTS (LNCLUDING ALL ~"IENDINIENTS) Non-federal contractors receiving financial assistance of $500,000 or more in federal funds from all sources, direct and indirect, are required to have a single or a program- specific audit conducted in accordance with the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133-Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations (revised June 27, 2003, effective for fiscal years ending after December 31, 2003). 'Non-federal entities that spend less than $500,000 a year in federal awards are exempt from federal audit requirements for that year, except as noted in Circular \ro. A- 133. Circular A-133 is available on the OMB Home Page at http:/./\vAw.omb.gov and then select "Grants Management" followed by "Circulars". Contractors, Sub-recipients and Sub-Contractors required to have an audit must ensure the audit is performed in accordance with Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (GAAS); Government Auditing Standards (the Revised Yellow Book) developed by the Comptroller General and the OMB Compliance Supplement. The Contractor, Sub-recipient and Sub-Contractors has the responsibility of notifying; the State Auditor's Office and requesting an audit. The Contractor, Sub-recipient. and Sub- Contractors shall maintain auditable records and accounts so as to facilitate the audit requirement. The Contractor, Sub-recipient and Sub-Contractor are responsible for any audit exceptions incurred by its own organization or that of its subcontractors. Responses to any unresolved management findings and disallowed or questioned costs shall be included with the audit report. The Contractor, Sub-recipient and Sub-Contractor must respond to Department requests for information or corrective action concerning audit issues or findings within 30 days of the date of request. The Department reserves the right to recover from the Contractor, Sub-recipient and Sub-Contractor all disallowed costs resulting from the audit. Once the single audit has been completed, the Contractor, Sub-recipient and/or Sub- Contractor must send a full copy of the audit to the Department and a letter stating there were no findings or if there were findings, the letter should provide a list of the findings. The Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor must send the audit and the letter no later than nine (9) months after the end of the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor fiscal year(s) to: Tom Matter Spokane Department of Emergency Management J 1618 N. Rebecca Spokane, WA 99217 In addition to sending a copy of the audit, the Sub-recipient and/or Sub- Contractor must include a corrective action plan for any audit findings and a copy of the management letter if one was received. 5. ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS a. The SUBREU PIENT and Sub-Contractor acknowledge that public records, as defined by RCW 42.56.020, that have been made or received by the Department in connection with the transaction of public business are subject to inspection by the public in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.56 and to the extent applicable WAC Chapter 118-02, except as exempted under RCW 42.56, RCW 43.21F.060(1), or other statutes. b. In compliance with RCW 39.29.080, the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall provide access to data generated under this agreement to the Department and the State Auditor at no additional cost. This includes access to all information that supports the findings, conclusions, and reconunendations of the Contractor's reports, including computer models and methodology for those models. 6. RECAPTURE PROVISIONS CIn the event that the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor fails to expend funds under this C agreement in accordance with state laces and/or the provisions of this agreement, the Department reserves the right to recapture funds in an amount equivalent to the extent of the noncompliance. Such right of recapture shall exist for a period not to exceed six years following contract termination or audit resolution, whichever is later. Repayment by the Contractor, Sub- recipient and/or Sub-Contractor of finds under this recapture provision shall occur within 30 days of demand. In the event that the Department is required to institute legal proceedings to enforce the recapture provision, the Department shall be entitled to its costs thereof, including reasonable attorney's fees. 7. COMPLIANCE NVITH APPLICABLE LAW The Contractor and all sub-recipients and/or Sub-Contractors shall comply with, and the Department is not responsible for determining compliance with, any and all applicable federal, state; tribal government, and local laws, regulations, and/or policies. This obligation includes, but is not limited to, nondiscrimination laws and/or policies; the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Ethics in Public Service (RCW 42.52); Covenant Against Contingent Fees (48 C.F.R. Sec. 52.203-5); Public Disclosure (RCW 42.56); and safety and health regulations. In the event of the sub-recipient or a subcontractor's noncompliance or refusal to comply with any law or policy, the Department may rescind, cancel, or terminate the agreement in whole or in part. The sub-recipient and/or Sub Contractor is responsible for any and all costs or liability arising from the sub-recipients and/or sub contractor failure to comply with applicable law. L 8. NONDISCRIMINATION During the perforinane.e of this agreement, the Contractor, sub-recipient and Sub- Contractor shall comply with all federal and state nondiscrimination statutes and i regulations. These requirements include, but are not limited to: a. Nondiscrimination in Employment: The Contractor, Sub-recipient and Sub- Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, national origin, creed, marital status, age, Vietnam era or disabled veterans status, or the presence of any sensory, mental, or physical handicap. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer, recruitment or recruitment selection for training, including apprenticeships and volunteers. This requirement does not apply, however, to a religious corporation, association, educational institution or society with respect to the employment of individuals of a particular religion to perform wort: connected with the carrying on by such corporation; association, educational institution or society of its activities. 9. AiNIERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) OF 1990, PUBLIC LAW 101- 336, 42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. also referred to as the "ADA" 28 CFR Part 35 and iLs implementing regulations. The Contractor, Sub-recipient and Sub-Contractor must comply with the ADA, which provides comprehensive civil rights protection to individuals with disabilities in the areas of employment, public accommodations, state and local goverrunent services, and telecommunication. 10. CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT SUSPENSION OR INELIGIBILITY If federal funds are the basis for this AGREEMENT, Sub-recipient or Sub-Contractor certifies that neither the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participating in this contract by any federal department or agency. If requested by the Department the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall complete and sign a Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility, and Voluntary Exclusion form. Further, the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor agrees not to enter into any arrangements or contracts related to this agreement with any party that is on the "General Service Administration List of SU13RE-CIPIENT Excluded from Federal Procurement or Non-procurement Programs" which can be found at www.epls.gov. 11. L1A-IITATION OF AUTHORITY "Authorized Signature" Only the assigner] Authorized Signature for the Department or the assigned delegate by writing (delegation to be made prior to action) shall have the express, implied, or apparent authority to alter, amend, modify, or waive any clause or condition of this agreement. Furthermore, any alteration; amendment, modification, or waiver of any clause or condition of this agreement is not effective or binding unless made in writing and signed by the authorizW. persons representing the parties to this agreement.. 12. CONTRACTOR NOT EMPLOYEE The Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor and/or employees or agents performing under this agreement are not employees or agents of the Department in any manner whatsoever. The Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor will not be presented as nor claim to be an i officer or employee of the Department or of the State of Washington by reason hereof, nor will the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor make any claim, demand, or application to or for any right, privilege or benefit applicable to an officer or employee of the Department or of the State of Washington, including, but not limited to, Worker's Compensation coverage, unemployment insurance benefits, social security benefits, retir=- ent membership or credit, or privilege or benefit which would accrue to a civil service employee under Chapter 41.06 RCW. 13. SUBCONTRACTING All subcontracts entered into pursuant to this agreement shall incorporate this AGREEMENT in full by reference. Neither the Sub-recipient nor any subcontractor shall enter into subcontracts for any of the wort: contemplated under this agreement without. obtaining prior written approval of the Department. Sub-recipient and/or Sub- Contractor shall use a competitive process in award of any contracts with subcontractors that are entered into after original contract award. The Department may request a copy of any and/or all subcontracts for work being completed under this agreement. 14. AGREEMENT i\IODIFICATIONS The Department. Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor may, from time to time, request changes to the AGREEMENT. Any such changes that are mutually agreed upon by the Department, Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor shall be incorporated herein by written amendment to this AGREEMNN . It is mutually agreed and understood that no alteration or variation of the terms of this AGREEMENT shall be valid unless made in writing and signed by the SUBREC1PMNIT/Sub-Contractor hereto, and that any oral - understanding or agreements not incorporated herein, unless made in writing and signed by the SU[IRECIPIENT/Sub-Contractor hereto, shall not be binding. 15. SEVERA.BILITY In the event any term or condition of this AGREEMENT or application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect other terms, conditions, or applications of this AGREEMENT, which can be given effect without the invalid term, condition, or application. To this end, the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT are declared severable. 16. ADYA.NC> PA)'ME_N'TS PROL-IYBITED The Department shall make no payments in advance or in anticipation of goods or services to be provided under this AGREEMENT. Sub-recipients and/or Sub- Contractor shall not invoice the Department in advance of delivery of such goods or services. 17. TAXES All payments accrued on account of payroll taxes, unemployment contributions, any other taxes, insurance or other expenses for the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor or its staff shall be the sole responsibility of the Sub-recipient and or Sub-Contractor. 19. TRAVEL AND SUBSISTENCE REIMBURSEMENT Unless the contract specifically provides for different rates, any travel or subsistence reimbursement allowed under this ageement shall be paid in accordance with rates set pursuant to RCW 43.03.050 and RCW 4' ).03.060 as now existing or amended. The Sub- recipient and/or Sub-Contractor may be required to provide to the Department copies of receipts for any travel related expenses that are authorized under this AGREEMENT. 20. LEGAL RELATIONS Each party to this AGREEMENT shall be responsible for injury to persons or damage to property resulting from negligence on the part of itself, its employees, agents, officers, or subcontractors. Neither party assumes any responsibility to the other party for the consequences of any act or omission of any third party. 21. TERiNTi,NATiON OR SUSPENSION FOR CAUSE Ili the event the Department determines the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor has failed to comply with the conditions of this agreement. in an acceptable and timely manner, the Department has the right to suspend or terminate this agreement. The Department. shall notify the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor in writing of the need to take corrective action. If the default or violation is not corrected after ten (10) days or within a reasonable timeframe as determined by the Department, this agreement shall be deemed terminated. The Department reserves the right to suspend all or part of the AGREEMENT, withhold further payments, or prohibit the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor from incurring additional obligations of funds during investigation of the alleged compliance breach and pending corrective action by the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor or a decision by the Department to terminate the AGREEMENT. In the event this AGREEME\'T is terminated as provided above, the Department shall be entitled to pursue the same remedies ag=ainst the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor as it could pursue in the event of a breach of the AGREEMENT by the Sub-recipient and/ or Sub-Contractor. The rights and remedies of the Department provided for in this clause shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. The termination shall be deemed to be a "Termination for Convenience" if it is determined that the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor: (1) was not in default, or (2) failure to perform was outside of their control, fault or negligence. The rights and remedies of the Department provided in this contract are not exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law. 22. TFR.MI1'ATION FOR COWEMENCE a. Notwithstanding any provisions of this AGREEMENT, the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor may terminate this contract by providing written notice of such termination to the Department Point of Contact identified in this agreement, specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days prior to such date. b. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this agreement, the Department may, by ten (10) days written notice, beginning on the second clay after the mailing of the written notice, terminate this AGREEMENT, in whole or in part. If this AGREEMENT is so terminated, the Department shall be liable only for payment required under the terms of this AGREEMENT for services rendered or goods delivered prior to the effective date of termination. (Upon notice of termination for convenience, the Department reserves the right to suspend all or part of the AGREEMENT, withhold further payments, and prohibit the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor from incurring additional obligations of finds.) 23. LOSS OR REDUCTION OF FUNDING In the event funding from state, federal, or other sources is withdrawn, reduced, or limited in any way after the effective date of this AGREEMENT and prior to normal completion, the Department may terminate this AGREEMENT immediately upon notification to the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor under Item 24. "Termination for J Convenience, Section b", without the ten (10) day notice requirement. Alternatively, the SUBRECIPIENT/Sub-Contractor may renegotiate the terms of this AGREEMENT . 'I under "AGREEWNT Modifications" to comply with new funding limitations and conditions, although the Department has no obligation to do so. 24. TERML lATION PROCEDURE Upon tenmination of this AGREEMENT the Department, in addition to any other rights provided in this AGREEMENT, may require the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor to deliver to the Department any property specifically produced or acquired for the performance of such part of this AGREEMENT as has been terminated. The Department shall pay to the Sub-recipients and/or Sub-Contractor the agreed upon price, if separately stated, for completed work and services accepted by the Department, and the amount agreed upon by the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor and the Department for (i) completed work and services for which no separate price is stated, (ii) partially completed work and services, (iii) other property or services which are accepted by the Department, and (iv) the protection and preservation of property The rights and remedies of the Department provided in this section shall not be exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this AGREEMENT. After receipt of a notice of termination, and except as otherwise directed by the Department, the Sub-recipients and/or Sub-Contractor shall: a. Stop work under the AGREEMENT on the date, and to the extent specified, in the notice: b. Place no further orders or subcontracts for materials, services, or facilities except as may be necessary for completion of such portion of the work under the AGREEMENT as is not terminated; C. Assign to the Department, in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by Spokane County Prosecutor or his Authorized Department Representative, all of the rights, title, and interest. of the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor under the orders and subcontracts so terminated, in which case the Department has the right, at its discretion, to settle or pay any or all claims arising out of the termination of such orders and subcontracts. d. Transfer title to the Department and deliver in the manner, at the times, and to the extent directed by the Department any property which, if the AGREEMENT had been completed, would have been required to be fianished to the Department; e. Complete performance of such part of the work as shall not have been terminated by the Department; and f. Take such action as may be necessary, or as the Department may require, for the protection and preservation of the property related to this AGREEMENT which is in the possession of the Sub-recipient and/or Sub-Contractor and in which the Department has or may acquire an interest. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ~i Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 9/25/07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business (E new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Expanded Classification Grades - Deputy City Manager GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 2.50.070 and 2.50.080 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council periodically considers revision of the Employee Position Classification and Salary Plan. BACKGROUND: The relevant provisions of SVMC 2.50.070 and 2.50.080 provide for the ongoing update of the Employee Position Classification and Salary Plan so that the City may continue to recruit and retain qualified employees. The Deputy City Manager (DCM) position is currently placed on Grade 21, as are the three department head positions that report to the DCM. A review of the organizational structure and current broadband market earnings for the position indicate that the position would be more appropriately classified at Grades 21 - 22; reflecting its reporting hierarchy and increasing managerial flexibility in recruiting. OPTIONS: 1. Approve the reclassification. 2. Give the matter further thought. 3. Decline the reclassification. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the reclassification of the Deputy City Manager position to grades 21 - 22, effective immediately. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The low end of grade 21 is $7,627 per month and the high end of grade 22 is 10,865 per month. There are funds available in the budget to cover any additional cost that may be incurred in 2007. Adequate provision will be made in the 2008 budget. STAFF CONTACT: Dave Mercier ATTACHMENTS None CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 09-25-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: 10 consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: City Hall Holiday Closure Notice BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to close City Hall Monday, December 24, 2007, for the entire workday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.: and to remain open for the regular workday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Monday, December 31, 2007. BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Dave Mercier ATTACHMENTS ~l CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 09-25-07 City Manager Sign-off- Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin, report ® pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 07-015 Adopting Uniform Development Code PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Per the dates shown in the accompanying ordinance, Council deliberated on the following UDC Titles: Title 17 - General Provisions; Title 18 - Administration, Boards and Authorities; Title 19 - Zoning Regulations; Title 19 Appendix A - Schedule of Permitted Uses - Use Matrix; Title 20 - Subdivision Regulations; Title 21 - Environmental Controls; Title 22 - Development Standards; Title 22 Appendix A - Approved Planting List; General Definitions, and Zoning Map. On June 5, 2007, Council adopted Ordinance 07-010 which adopted Title 24 - Building Regulations. At its September 11, 2007 Council meeting, Council held a public hearing on any aspect of the UDC; and then had the first reading of the Ordinance, and passed a motion to advance the ordinance to a second reading. At the September 18, 2007 Council study session, Council was handed a red-line version of the ordinance with proposed changes since the first reading. That has again been updated to include the Council deliberations of September 18, 2007. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve ordinance 07-015 as amended. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mike Connelly/Greg McCormick]Scott Kuhta ATTACHMENTS: Draft, Redline Ordinance 07-015 Proposed Amended page 25 of Appendix A Proposed Amended Appendix 19-A Schedule of Permitted Uses (pages 3 and 7) Rationale for proposed change for the 10-trip exemption (Inga Note) Rationale for proposed change for the stormwater change (Henry Allen) CITY OF SPOKANT.. VAI-I-EY SPOKANE COLTNFFY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 07-015 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE. VALLEY. SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, REPEALING PORTIONS OF EXISTING TITLE 10, UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE.; REPEALING SPOKANE VALLEY MU'N'ICIPAL CODE SECTION 255.0104150; RENAMING RENLAINING TITLE 10 AS "COMMELTE TRIP REDUCTION PI,ANI ODE, " AND ADOPTING TITLES 17, 18, 19. 20.21 AND 22 AS A PORTION OF THE NEW CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE AND ZONING MAP. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Title 10 UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE , including the adoption of an official zoning map, through the adoption of Ordinances 31, 32, 33. 48, 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 54A-1, 57. 58. 59, 63, 03-078, 03-081. 03-087 and 03-097 in 2003, and Ordinances 04- 002, 04-004, 04-008, 04-010, 04-013.04-014, and 04-016 in 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has since the dates of adoption set forth above, amended Title 10 UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE on a number of occasions through the adoption of Ordinance 04-033, Dimensional Standards for Residential and Non-Residential Development-, Ordinance 04-034, Administrative Variances and Exceptions; Ordinance 04-035, Urban Residential F-state (UR-1): Ordinance 04-038, Clear View Triangles; Ordinance 04-046, Planned Unit Developments; Ordinance 04- 047, City of Spokane Valley Building Codc; Ordinance 05-003 Area-Wide Rezone Greenacres: Ordinance 05-012, Street Vacations; Ordinance 05-013. Stormwater-, Ordinance 05-021, Appeal Procedures from Nearing Examiner to City Council; Ordinance 05-026, Planned Unit Developments: Ordinance 05-034, Stormwater Utility Charges; Ordinance 06-001, Extending Urban Residential Estate (UR-1) Interim Zoning in Ponderosa and Rotchford Areas; Ordinance 06-002, Amending SVMC 10.30.060 by amending Chapter 14.702 Airport Overlay (OA) Zone; Ordinance 06-003, Enforcement and Administrative Procedures, Ordinance 06-004, Code Compliance; Ordinance 06-005, Code Compliance; Ordinance 06-006, Repealing the Renumbering Uniform Development Code; Ordinance 06- 007, Repealing specific County Zoning Classifications previously adopted by SVMC 10.30.060 and Ordinance 03-053; Ordinance 06-008, Business Zones Matrix; Ordinance 06-009, Sign Regulation: Ordinance 06-012, Off Road Vehicle Use; Ordinance 06-015, Right of Way Permits; Ordinance 06-017. International Property Maintenance Code; Ordinance 06-019, Extending Urban Residential Estate (UR- I) Interim Zoning in Ponderosa and Ratchford Areas; Ordinance 06-020, Comprehensive Plan Amendments; Ordinance 06-025. Appeal Fee for Administrative Decisions; Ordinance 06-027, Right -of- 1ti"ay Permits; Ordinance 07-001, Extending Urban Residential Estate (UR-1) Interim Toning in Ponderosa and Rotchford Areas; and, Ordinance 07-010, Establishing Title 24 of the Spokane Valle Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, SVMC sections 2.55.0140-050 setting forth the establishment and purpose (A the planninL commissions is now included within SVMC Chapter 18, adopted herein; and NVIIEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted its new Comprehenske Plan April 25, 2006, through the adoption of Ordinance 06-010; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley subsequently has drafted a new Limform Development Codc «hich is the subject matter of this ordinance to replace the existing Title 10 excepting sections 10.20.2 10- 320 Commute Trip Reduction, and to implement the goals and policies of the aNive refercnced Cite of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, 'title 24 of the Uniform Development Code has previously been adopted by the City of Spokane Valley City Council on line 5, 2007. by adoption of ordinance 07-010. and Ordinance 07-015 udoptirik UL)C 200 ~ 1 L't I I R 117' 11 HER aS, it(_V 3tj.70__ development regulations; ail WHEREAS, the City of S goals and policies of ii RCW 36.70.x.020; ar WHEREAS, the vlij ~~~.h.ul~ v.11: 1~.~ I.l~~.•iL..:ii'1! a .~I ,I requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act RCW 43.21C et seq; replacing the existing adoptc, environmental regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is n thetpr. rf dr►ttinc imth a 41ulr:1me_ MaAcr Plan31~: "11-:1 1`4 1If" !C1 'I III ITIC14! rC '.IIJtI. sip fvv":4?.- crtCr~H+ ~Afi ..4{PF-Refsff~-+ implement. the requirements of the Shorelines Management Act, RCW 90.58; ri=.;:i t., 1,, .!d ip__'1_11 .l I,1. te: an,l WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Vallcy created specific development regulations to regulate land usc activities within the City of Spokane Valley including zoning ordinances. PUT) ordinances, subdivi, ij-, and binding site plan ordinances as authorized by RCW 36.70. +.030 (7), replacing the exist development regulations, and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley created specific development regulations to prnnect cr►tiL areas, including wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation arca~; :rrul . ~i. ally ha~ard~~uti arc., and frequently flooded areas, identified under RC.W 36.70A.170. replacing the existing adopted development regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley created a new official zoning map as authorized by KC ,6.70A.030 (7) replacing the existing adopted official zoning map; and WHEREAS, adoption of the Cite of Sxx~kanc'a Valle%',. I'niform Development Cnde must he processed in compliance w It 43.21 C~~et seq.; a±; WHEREAS, pul_)iiL laatt li ll ):1i It if .:;;lt i)U;I~C aJ rllyJUL6 :L'+ I, ,L; ;1 1;11 {u i~( `A II) ,(1" 11 . i)1v 1';tI,I I c011sistent with the Public Participation Plan (aku Citizen Participation Ptan) ,adopted in conjunction the development of the City of Spokane Valley September, 2003, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.140; all, WHEREAS, development regulations are to be aduptco %kah n tilc tune Luwitiaua5 ioiti► In K(_ ?6.70A.010; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is required to notify the Department of Community Trade a; Economic Development of its intent to adopt , final adoption pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106; an,i WHEREAS, the development regulations sii,:ii ii,a. development regulations provide rnfticient capacity for land suitable for development within ti iurisdiction to ac WHERFAS, the adoption of this Uniform Development Cade is neces--an to protect the health. safety,. and welfare of the general public and the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1: Adontigp of FindiM of Fact. The City of Spokane Valley finds that all Growth Management Act (CPAA) and other statutory prerequisites for the adoption of the City of Spokane Valley-'s Uniform Development Code have been met. and hereby adopts the following: FLHDINGS OF FACT 1. Mandate to Plan under GMA: The City of Spokane Valley is a City that falls under the full mandates of the GMA as of the date of the City's incorporation on March 31, 2003. 2. Consistences with GMA Goals: The Uniform Development Code comprised of Tiles 17 General Provisions, Title 18 Boards and Authorities, Title 19 Zoning Regulations and Map, Title 20 Subdivision Regulations, Title 21 Environmental Controls, Title 22 Design and Development Standards and Title 24 Building Codes, with accompanying appendices' is consistent with the goals provided to guide the development and adoption of such a code asset forth in RCW 36.70A.020. 3. Consistency, with Adopted Comprehensive Platt: The Uniform Development Code is consistent with and implements the adopted City of Spokane Vallee Comprehensive Plan in a manner N%hich is consistent with the requirements of RC %k' -,6.70A_040 (4), specifically: 1. 1 ifle 17 contains general pnivisions goveming the administration of the code. Specific implementation includes but is not limited to the following: a- Chapters 17.10 - 17.90 contain provisions concerned specifically with the permitting and appellate process that are consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.708 Local Pmlect Review, and which implement the Core Values set forth in the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (hereinafter SVCP) CHAPTER I - INTRODUCTION, Section 1.3 Goal and Policies, and SVCP CHAPTER 2- LAND USF., section 2.6 Development Review Process. b. Chapter 17.100 Comt?liance and enforrxmettt contains all provisions related to enforcement of the code in a manner which implement the Corr Values set forth in SVCP CHAPTER I - iNI"RODUC7lON, Section 1.3 Gloats and Policies .and the goals and policies -set forth in SVCP CHAP ,10 - NElGl_113()RN0O1?5 by providing a means and method to ensure compliance to maintain consistency with the plan, preserve and protect the character of existing neighborhoods and identify the need for outreach activities as more specifically set forth in SVCP Section 10.3 Goals and Polici& NG-1, NG-2_,NG-3 and NGA, SVCP CHAPTER 7 - ECONO,% lC DEVELOPMENT-. 7.0 Introduction and Purpose, 7.2 Planning Context, EDG -7, and SVCP CIiAPTER 5 =HOUSING, 2. Title 18 sets forth the specific duties and authority of the pl'lanning '&Commission. itllearing Examiner, cC'ommunity JDevelopment tlDirector, bliuilding a(_)fficial and !.Public w1~'orks dUirector. This section implements the Core Values set forth in SVCP CHAPTER 1 - NTRODUCTiON, and S -ction 1.3 Goals argd Policies 3. Title 19 SetS forth the riming designations and official controls implementing the goals and policies set forth in SVi'I' CHAPTER I - LAND USE, CHAPTL-R Ordinance U?-ol'i adopting UDC _70117 Pagc 3 of I I RANSPURTATUN, CI I I LR ~ - 1 i(_)USIN6_..C HAP'1 LK_G - PRIV A I L A`, i PUBLIC tml_ITiES. CHAPTER 7_- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, CHAPTER > NATiJRAL ETIViRONMENT. CI-IAFM-R 9 RK1; _R_FC'RF N'TICIN A N1) f ARTS and CHAPTER 10 - NE1GI_LBORHUQI , Title 19 further implements the specific Gr, identified in SVCP CHAPTER TWO - LANTD U5L SccLion-'. i.i It ~~wth Nlana;-'enieli Act which include urban growth, reduce sprawl, housing, open space and recreation. environment, public facilities and service. historic preservation and property rights. Specific implementation includes but is not limited to the following: a. Chapter 19.20 Establishment of Amin&Distric establishes zoning districts in a manner consistent with SVCP CHAPTER 2 - I-AND USE, 2.5 Land Use Desiznations. b. Chapter 19.120 Permitted and ccesso ises adopting the use matrix a, appendix 19--A implements the allowed uses and limitations envisioned for earl, zone contained in SVCP CfIAPTER TWO - LAND USE as well as limitation, recommended by SVCP (JIAPTER 8 - NA-f1'RA1 F,AIRONNWNT. and opc,• space requirements identified in -SVCP i AND THE ARTS. c. Section 19.20.020. Zoning_Distr_ict h9ap adopts tiic utticial zoning rnap. I h> > maps directly implements all of the use categories set forth in SVCP CHAPTER 2 - LAND USE, 2.5 I and t,! _se Drsjpr bons. In the low density residential category the map further divides the affected areas into zoning categories R-1, R-2 and R-,. Two zones are also consistent with the office category where the map can further b, divided into two categories, "_(_iarden Office, GO and Office O. In determining the { specific placement of each zone on the Zoning District Map, the factors 1,Acr) inr . a count include the follo%%inv criteria set forth in SVCP C11 k'l b. community chill'y' r c. availability of utility ticry i,:e:, Lind d. mailability of transit sen-ice C. cOrnratihilit,. yvith ,urroundinl-I nri,,htxinc(x)dti In addition consi&ration i, giv.n Lur future necd~ for alurdabic housing, identified in SVCP CHAPTER i HOUSING, and the future anticipated growlh discussed in SVCP Section, 2.4 Pro-ected Growth and Development Capacity anL: NXCP CRAFTER 4 - CAPITA!. FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES, and the goals and policic~ of SVCI' CHA1' 1-ER_ 7 - fCONOMiC Dl.VLLOP\IFN•1-. d. Section 19.20.060 Non-l onfemninv- Uses and Structures allov.-iLig tile «mtinuation of historic -properties and preserves the character of existing neighborhoods implementing in part SVCI' Section 2.8 Historical and Cultural Resource. (specific provision for Historic Preservation are reserved for later development in Chapter 19.100.) SVCP Sc• SVCP Section 2.5.1 Low fknsit} Re,,identi,l' C►rdinaiuc L17-01 :~dupung UD( 2007 1 age ut 1 I e. Chapter 14.30 Changes and Amendments adepts strict criteria evaluating zone changes to ensure future compatibility with the surrounding neighborhaxis implementing SVCP Section 2.5.1 Low Density Residential. -Ftesidentia1 Developments implements SVCP Section 2.5.1 f. Chapter 19.50 Planncd Residential and SVCP Section 2.7.2 Planned uUnh Developments. g. Chapter 19.90 Essential Public Facilities (EPFs) implements SVCP Section 4.2, Essential Public Faciliti c~. h. Section 19.110.030 Airport Hazard Overlay implements Aviation goals and Policies contained in SVCP CHAPTER 3 - TRANSPORTA ON TG-12, and TG- 13 and SVCP Section 3.5. i. Section 19.110.040 Pipeline Hazard Overlay implements goats and policies set forth in SVCP TG-15. 4. Title 20 sets forth the regulations governing subdivisions, short subdivisions and binding site plans in a manner cortsistent with the provisions of RCW 58.17. The provisions of this chapter implement the goals of SVCP Section 2.1.1 Grow Mat _agement Act specifically by encouraging development where public facilities and services exist and are adequate, preserving the rights of property owners, creating opportunities for parks and open spsces. and'coordinatir»zeti transportation facilities and plr j% idIvi! affordable housing. (See also SVCP C-TAP"fFR 2 -_LA-\TD I?SE Police Topic 7 Affordable Housing.) Development pursuant to this chapter also provides the growth necessary to accommodate the projected growth set forth in SVCP Suction 2.4 Projected Growth and Development Capacit}. Subdivision controls further, along with the specific standards adopted pursuant to Title 22, ensure compliance with the goals and policies of SVCP CHAPTER "1'HRIl_ TRANSPORTATION, specifically the provisions of 3.2 Streets and Roadways, 3.3 Non- Motorized Transportation; 3.4 Transit; SVCP CHAMR 4 _ CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES; SVCP CHAPTER 5 - HOUSING; SVCP CIUIPTZR 6 - PItNATL A'D PUBLIC 1JUL T ES and SVCP CIiAPTER ? FCQ1r(741C 6 GQas and .Policies 17rVELOPMI NT including but not limited to 7. . FDl' 1. I 5. Title 21 contains all environmental controls mandated by the State F.nyirimmental Policy Act, floodplain regulations, critical arras including fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geological hazardous areas, critical aquifer recharge areas and shorelines implementing the goals and policies of SWP CHAP'T'ER 8 - NATURAL ENVIR Nl•'IT N . The ordinance ad,~tl(cd hertit). c,-7"-adopts the existing Shoreline Master Program previously adopted by Spokane County until such time as the City of Spokane Valley completes its Shoreline Master Plan. 6. Title 222 contains the specific design and development standards imposed on all development in all cones. Matters addressed include concurrency, off-street parking and loading requirements, outdk-w r lighting standards, fencing, screening and landscaping, the regltltttiOn of signs, winless co nnuinication fjll'iliheS. titre~t~, sidcwalk:; and public Ordinance 07-015 adopting UDC 2007 Yaec ~ of 11 places, street vacations. and storni v.ater manaeemcnt regulations. Each ( the:, standards address specific goals and policies set forth in the comprch_•,:;,%+_• 1,1,c Specific implementation includes but is not limited to the followirI_ a. Chapter 22.10 Concurrcncy implements SVCP I_ i I i I i( TRANSPORTATION, including SVCI' Sections 3.1.3 Concurrenev and Lc%cl of Sc_rv_ice, 3.2 Streets and Road„avs, and SVCP CHAPTER 4 - CAPITAL_ FACILITIES AN PUBLIC SERVICES. including SVCP Sections 4.1. Gro.1b Management Act, 4.3 Goals and Policies, 4.4 Capital 1,~L II Pi.i:; . ,ii;J CI IAPTI;R 9 - PARKS RECREATION AND THE AR I h. C'haptcr,~ 22.50 Off-Street Parkin}" Li-haptcr 22.60 Outdoor LiLhtuig 5tand:;l.i • Chapter 2-1.70 Fencing. Screening and-Landscaping . ail^i Chapter 22.110 Si~rl Re altions all serve to protect and preserve the character of neighborhoods. promote safety and protect utilities implementing the goals and policies of SVCP CiiAPTER 2 - LAND USE; CHAPTER 3 - TRANSPORTATION; CHAPTER 6 - PRIVATE AND PUBLIC UTILITIES; CHAPTER _7_ - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; and CHAPTER 10 --NEIGHBOMOODS. c. Chapter 22.120 Wireless t-t_ ommunication Facilities_ intplcinent; the comprehensive plan in the same manner as is set forth above in section b. In addition, it implements specific goals set forth in SVCP CHAPTF..R 6 - PRiVATT. AND PUBLIC UTILITIES, including Sections 6A Telecommunications Utilities and 6.4.2 Telephone Systcros (wireless.) d. Chapter 22.150 Stormwater Martakemznt __KM41ations implements SVCP CHAPTER 4 - CAPITAL FACILITIES AND PUBLIC SERVICES, including SVCP Sce:tion 4.3. Gual-a and Policies. Storm%%ater Coal, CFG-6 and 4.3.16 Stormwatcr Facilitie,-,- -t. InipleinentingSEPA: Title 21, tirrti,m: 2I 11).[1111 - I .x[1.1 "t1 implement and is consistent %0h the requirements of State Etivirnrncntal Policy Act RCN' 43 21C and related admini<tratke regulations WAC 197-11. Iniplementing the Shorelines Management Act. Title 21 Section 21.50 adopts by references the Spokane County Shoreline Prograrn including amendments set forth in Findings of Fact and Resolution 2-0471 passed hrv the Spokane County Commissioners on May 7~L. 2002. This program WIti l ,:II:i 1)C- (rL c .:7 i .III. i P ~ %1 . !pptz ;II 11 r.1 Ti." TT !T^ Th. rL II•,ii~, rTlc!-I V, A 6. t'0:111iltan_LC vu1111 tt, The City of SI n._ l I: .13.210 for each Title adopted belo% i. 'I'itle 17: July 21, 2+I ii- Title 18: July 21.2++ iii. Title 19: Januarw 2-'. iv. Title. 20: October 5, 21--W Title 21; October 13, w+ DRA FT vii Title 24: Januarti 22. 2007 b. The City of Spokane Valley has made a Determination of Significance in regard to the action of each Title adopted below as follows: i. Title 17: July 21, 2006 ii. Title 18: July 21, 2006 ill. Title 19: January 22, 2007 iv. Title 20: October 5, 2006 v. Title 21: October 13, 2006 vi Title 22: January 22, 2007 vii. Title 24: January 22, 2007 7. Consideration of Critical Areas and Reso a Lands. Title 21, >,~Axtions 21.40.010 - 21.40.040 have been adopted to protect critical areas, including wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and geologically hazardous areas; Title 1 Sections 21.30.010 - 21.30.075 have been adopted to protect frequently flooded areas, in a rnanner consistent with the requiremenu; of RCW 36.70A.060. 8. Capacity fi r H_qusine nerd Employment Growth. The City of Spokane Valley addresses the issues of housing and employment opportunity in its Comprehensive Plan, specifically Chapter 2, Lazed Use and Chapter 5, Housing The development zones created by Title 19 of the Uniform ( Development Code set forth below, -implement- their use categoric; in a manner consistent with the requirernents of RCW 36.70A.115. r•. Citizen Participation and Notice; a- The City of Spokane Valle} has adopted a Public Participation flan in conjunction with the development of its Comprehensive Plan and Subsequent development regulations implementing that plan in a manner consistent with RCA 36.70A.140. The public participation and notice provided and set forth specifically below is consistent with that plan b. 'Me Cite of Spokane Valley has complied with the public participation and notice requirements of RC 36,70A 0-~ tiPecifically as follov., Stakeholder Public Re%icw: Date Evcut '-8-Feb-07 Open House - Public Discussion 2-Mar-07 Open House - Public Discussion 8-Mar-07 Open House - Public Discussion 9-Mar-07 Open House - Public Discussion 16-Mar-117 Open I low-c - Public Di-.c uisiun t hdinance 07-015 adopting t t DC 2007 I'a, i cif I I Date - 13-Ck.t-05 Discussion definition, use matrix 10-Nov-05 Discussion definition, use matrix 8-I)CC-05 Discussion definition, use matrix 12-Jan-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 26-Jan-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 9-Feb-06 Discussion definition, use matrix I3-.Apr-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 1 1-May-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 25-May-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 8-Jun-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 27-Jul-06 Discussion definition, use matrix 10-Aug-06 Discussion 17, 18, 20 24-Aug-06 Discussion 17. 18, 21 31-:lug-06 Discussion 17. 18.22 28-Sep-06 Public Hearin 9-Nov-06 discussion 2 14-Dec-06 Discussion I I -Jan-07 Public Hearn i 25-Jan-07 Public Heariuv . 8-Feb-07 Public Hearing --'I, Di,. u- 15-Feb-07 Study Session 20-Feb-07 Study Session 22-Feb-07 Public Hearing 19 2_' 22 8-Mar-07 Public Hearing 19 12-Apr-07 Public Hearing - 26-Apr-07 Deliberations P; I0-May-07 Deliberations I 14-Jun-07 Deliberations 21-1un-07 Deliberations 1 28-Jun-07 Deliberations 22 12-Jul-07 Deliberations 11; 19-Jul-07 Deliberations'-' 26-Jul-07 Deliberations 9-Aug-07 Public Hearing /4 1111 i u 23-Aug-07 Deliberations Zoning Map 30-Aug-07 Deliberations Zoning Map Ordinimcc 07-U 15 adopting UDC 2007 Page 8 of I I City Council Review: Date F% ent 10-Oct-06 admin report 17-18 1 O-Oct-06 info packet 20 - 21 24-Oct-06 admin report 20 14-Nov-06 info update UDC 12-Dec-06 admin report 17 - 18 - 20 3-Jan-07 discussion 17, 18, 19 2-1-Jan-07 admin report 21, shoreline 30-Jan-07 admin report 21, shoreline, review 17. 0 20-Feb-07 discussion 21, info 19, 22, 24 27-176-07 admit report 17, 19, 22, 24 3-Apr-07 Pass UDC chapters to Council 8-Mav-07 Info title 24 1 _5 -May-0 7 titles 19, 22 info; update 24 22-May-07 First reading title 24 5-Jun-07 Second reading title 24 17-Jul-07 Review, discuss 19 31-Jul-07 Deliberations Title 19 13-Aug-07 Deliberations Title 19 20-Aug-07 Deliberations Title 19 21-Aug-07 Deliberations Title 22 27-Aug-07 Deliberations Title 19 28-Aug-07 Public Hearing Uniform Development ('ode -t-Sep-07 Deliberations Title 22 7 , S-Srp 07 D clibcrutions ApprndiL, I I SM07 Public Hearing and first rr i 19 Scp 07 Dul_iberations %%_rap up_itrT Notice provided: The City Council set sevcral public hearings and spcclal inmung-s for the purpose of receiving public comments and to allow Council opportunity to deliberate upon the City's proposed Uniform Development Code. Such hearings and special meetings were duly noticed in the City's official newspaper, the Valley News 1-Derald.- with notice also being placed on the City's website, and e-mailed to a list of citizens who had previously requested to be kept apprised of such meetings dealing with the Uniform Development Code. Special Notices for taking written public comment were advertised in the City's official newspaper, placed on the City's website, and e-mailed to the list of interested citizens as noted above. Agendas for each meeting were e-mailed to a list of interested citizens, placed on the City's website, and in cases where the meeting was a special" meeting, were advertised in the City's official newspaper. During those weeks when Council held meetings in addition to their regular scheduled Tuesday night mccting, weekly council meeting notices were also e-mailed to the interested citizen list, j and such "Meeting Calendar" was posted outside the City's Council eC'hambers. Agendas for each mectinL %N ere also e-mailed to the interested citizen list, and posted on the Cit 'r, website. Ordinancc 07-01 t :tdopting UDC -1007 Pa _ Q I 1 public comments relative to the City's proposed Lnilorm lhvcluptiwnt Code, 5u.:' meetings and hearings were duly noticed in the City's official newspaper. the Valle % ?Sews Herald: with notice also being placed on the City's website, and e-mailed to a li': of citizens who had previously requested to be kept apprised of Plannine Commiaein, Meetings. Regular Planning Commission agendas wvrc also posted to i and e-mailed to the interested citizen list for Planning Commission issu. c. The Citv Council finds that the public participation constitutcmi early ,iit,l public participation in the development and adoption of the Uniform Development Code as i set fi.irth herein. 10. Record Ix Cure the Council. I he Pity of Spokane Valle) C'itv Council has reviewed ar considered the testimony presented in open public hearings as well as the written documentatii submitted as part of and m addition it, that public hearing process. A record of all testim~)n\ hef- the Citv Council and copies of all submittals are maintaincd as part of the record sup ordinance, rat the City of'Spokane Valle\ City C'lerk's Office. 11. Re%ie\\ by l,fflice ot_ 01nununit% Trade and f_con,)rrlic lkvelgpment: Receipt of the prop.):,: Titles constituting the Uniform Development Code was acknowledged by CTED as fnllon\s- Ti,i 17: July 25, 2006, Title 18: July 25, 2006. *0le 1()• Jamiarv Z 1. ?nn7. Title ? 1- ()c Title 22: January 31, 2007, Title 24: Januar. Comments from CT'ED have been rcvirL•. i incorporated into the development regulation" 11. Adoption Schedule consistent with GMA_ I hC t!1111oliii Oc~clt piliCiil t.t,tle ItlcriLiilCti h,~ l,,'•t has been adopted in a manner consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A.0~t0. Formal extension of thc completion deadline until September 30, 2007 was Community, Trade and Economic Developmcnt on November 1 r, 'Heir, Section 2. Repealing Portions Spokane Vallev..N1unici sl_Code Tjtle The City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 10 Nections 1 n i i i i i r 1 t t' " I0.>>? 10 of the Sp\rkane Valley municipal Code Section 3. Repealinu_tiVMC Section 2.-i5.010-0- , The City ol'Spokanc Valley Municipal Code'title 2 SCL11011.1 _.55.01u-050 a,c hcreb', repcalct' _i ; ,Ic Section 4. Adopting Titlcs 17 18 19, 20 21 and 22 as portions ofthe Uniform Development. The City of Spokane Valley hereby adopts the Titles 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, along with all idci I i appendices constituting a portion of the Uniform Development Code, a copy of which is attached her, and by this reference incorporated herein. Section 5. Scverability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrasc of this Ordinance should be held to invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitution:: not affect the validity or constitutionality of any otter section, clause or phrase of this Ordinance Section 6. EfTective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirr\130j day:, sll~, publication of 11''.• r VltIIAOC:' 01- ;umrl,;:r\ ?11CF~:O llr= 1?1 tli.' ofFii i:0 tw%i, T,:Iper or the City uS Ordinance 07-01 ~ adori ing UUC 2007 Pagc 10 of . pa»cd b~ the ('itN Council this da} of September. ?007. MaNor, Diana Wilhite A'1"PEST: C im Clerk. Christine Bainbridge Approved as to form: Office Of the City Ationic\ i I ~,f 1 1 Ordinancc 07-015 adopting L I K' : OW" P-A~x f Council strike through 9-19i-07A ,+J Draft -Uniform Development Code Appendix A, Definitions • Shorelines on lakes less than twenty (20) acres in size and wetlands associated with such small lakes. (RCW 98.58 030(2)(c)). Shorelines of Statewide Significance are Shorelines of the State. Shorelands or shoreland areas: Those lands extending landward for two hundred (200) feet in all directions as measured on a horizontal plane from the ordinary high water mark. f oodways and contiguous floodplain areas landward two hundred (200) feet from such floodways; and all wetlands and river deltas associated with the streams, lakes (RCW 98.58.030(2)(f)) Shoreline Protection: Structural and nonstructural methods to control flooding or address erosion impacts to property and dwellings or other structures caused by natural processes, such as current, flood, wind, or wave action. Shoreline Restoration: The revegetation of a shoreline site cleared of vegetation and not covered by structures or occupied by other improvements following completion of a project. Shoreline substantial development: Any development of which the total cost or fair market value exceeds the dollar amount set forth in RCW 90.58 and WAC 173-26 for any improvement of property in the shoreline of the state. Ski wroom: A business establishment primarily for the display and seitino of a limited type or line of products that requires an area to setup and exhibit_the products, such as furniture building trade products inducing cabinets, fixtures, tile, carpeting, and other similar Items or products These business establishments are generally characterized as having a relatively low volume of customers at any one time frame compared to other retail type businesses. A showroom may include retail and wholesale sales, but must be contained in an entirely enclosed building with no outside storage of any materials, products, or parts. Any storage of material or products not displayed can oocupv no more than 40% of the gross floor area of the building and be contained within the some building as the display area. Sign: A visual communication device, structure, or fixture which is visible from any right-of-way and is intended to aid in promoting the sale of products, goods, services, events or to identify a building using graphics, letters, figures, symbols, trademarks or written copies Sign types include • Sign: Any board poster, placard, banner, flag, pennant, streamer, or similar structure. electronic or otherwise which is constructed, placed, attached, painted or fastened in any manner for the purpose of attracting attention of the public to any place, person, entity, or business • Sign Area: The gross surface area of the sign. • Sign, Abandoned: A sign. copy, that advertises a product or service no longer available or a business no longer in operation; a sign which Is illegible, In disrepair, or a safety hazard as a result of lack of maintenance; or a non-conforming sign that has lost its non-conforming rights • Abandoned Structure: A sign support structure upon which a sign is located when the advertised business is no longer conducted on the premises • Banner: A temporary sign of lightweight material mounted to a pole or building. • Sign, Billboard: A structure for the purpose of leasing advertising space to promote an interest other than that of an Individual, business, product or service available on the premises on which the structure Is located. • Sign, Copy: Letters, characters. illustrations, logos, graphics, symbols, writing or any combination thereof, designed to communicate information of any kind, or to advertise. announce or identify a person, entity, business, business product, or to advertise the sale, rental or lease of premises. • Sign, Copy Area: The area of the sign containing any copy, symbol, sign, logo or graphic. • Sign, Decorative Emblem (or standard): A one (1)- or two (2)-sided sign with or without copy that Is securely attached by grommets to the top and bottom of a mounting bracket attached to a permanently installed lighting fixture. • Sign, Directional: Any sign relating solely to internal pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation within a complex or project. .~a~:-+~ag;~la;~riy:f;~~al-w~::i~~} gc~w:_.~u.;: a;.~yve;t f~:,•~x .s.-t,:ia~ inG :Community QeveloomentlD loon-_ ent Reguletiorks%Final_ work oc del end_ ix1A Qendix A- strfk ttLoug da definit"k 9 1"7.d Page 25 of 32 Appendix 19-A Sch( of Petmittod Uses • City Council - OPAFT E o 4' R•fer•nc• Conditions y c f c 1! • r c~ v Q9rJ3-87 $ r3 °c E E o f E r a a rY ~ a z E o E E; N • • • 62 62-,1 i-,~mmundy resrknUal laai,ty, gurihir Ihur, • residents, no mcso than 25) 56 56173 Compmling istoragelproonashy.commerdal • 54 54151 Computer services • • • • • • • • • • 23 2373-236 ContraeWs yard • • • • • 62 623 Convalescent hnme. Nursing home • • 44 44512 C.onveruoixe Store • • A A • • • • • 33 339 CastnOc b Miscellaneous manularltrkug • • • • • • • • 62 6233 Day taro, Adull • • • A • • • A A A C C C C • • 62 824410 Day cote. Ctuld (13 rhh3mn or moat) • • A A • A A A • • • • • • 62 624410 Day rem, Chikl(12 diOdten tx leaver) • • • A A • • • A A A 45 4521 Departmentlvariotyslawe • • • • • 44 44611 Chug Slate • • • A • • • • A • J72 8123 Dry dennem • • • A • • • • 812332 Dry cleaning, laundry, linen supply plant, aomm.rciai • • 3211 t 14 Dry On • 4 4 814 Dwelling, aocessory apartments SVMC 19 40 100 814 DweNmg, Carelekees resitfonce O o 4 SVM(: 19.60.060( I) • • 7213 I)weNWV. Congregate • • • • • • • • 614 Dwelling, Duplex • • • 814 Owelhng, MA unruly • • • 4, 4 SVMC 19.80.020(2) • • • • • • 814 I)we9►rw), sxrgie tamity 41 4 SVMC 10 60.020(2) • • • 81 814 Dwelling, Townhouse • • • • 33 334-335 Electricalletoctronic1compuler component d • • • • • • • system manufacturkVIassembly 32 322226 Emery loth and sandpaper manufacturing • • 71 713 EntortamnenUroaoabon facildiee indonr • • • • • 71 7139 Entertakmonilrecreation facilitres.outtlorx • • • • • • 53 5323 Equipment Rental shop • • • • • 81 8113 Equipment sates, repair, and mWnIonance • • • • • 72 7222 EsprossoAt.atte Retalt Service • • • • • • • • • • • aj ry a. ;X; w 92 92 Essenhal Public Facilities w W c9 P, a. .4 L4 SVMC 19 90 A A 71 71394 Emrise (at~litylgym altdelic dub • • • A A • • • • A A 32 32592 Fxplaswe manufacturing • 49 03-190 Explosive slarage • • • • • • 81 814 Family Home, Mutt • • • • • • Permitted Use A Acoessory C7Ny T Temporary Pe+nut w Regional Siting Cnndil!onF Apply 3 C Conditional Une P'errna Appendix 19-A Schr of Permitted Uses CKV Gonad - DRAFT K r « rn b i c L' w 2 a ~ Rvfcronco Conditions 01 n v 04-19-07 " E 3 E 'E of E Z a" re M Q' U. 01 Z x o M 4 g Z U O V N Q l3: - - bmded to derna 45 452-153 Rolm! sates • • • A • • • A A manufactsrred on the premises. 71 713119 Riding stabic • • 33 33122 Rolling mill • 31 314991 Hope manufacturing • • 32 325212 Rubber redamation, menufadurWabrica ' • • • • • • • 61 6111 Schools - pubic and private - K ttxu 12 • • • • • • • • 61 6114 Schools, Professional, vurational & trade • • • • • • • • • • schools Shormnom • • • • • • 45 4533 Secondhand store, consignment sates • • • • • • 33 33905 Sign matustadunnghepeir • • 33 33995 Sign paint" shop • • • • • 32 32561 Soap and leaning compound mamdacturing • 56 56292 Sofid waste mcyclingArarwfer site fi O b'VMC 19.60 080(2) Specialized lrainingAearning schools or Adaptive rouse of exisl*V 61 6116 studios • • • • 4 • • • SIMClures Only no expansion allowed_ • • 49 4D319 Skxnge self-serv+oe (anlity • • • • 49 493 Slorage, generni - ouidoors fi O O O • See zoning dnstnets for conddxms Tank storage above. ground I.PG O O O 4 O O O O O SVMC 21 40 040 21 213112 Tank stomps, critical material above ground O fi SVMC 21 40.040 21 213112 Tank storage, critical mater ml below ground O O O O SVMC 2140 040 31 3161 Tanning, curing of hides snit skins • 72 7224 Tavern • • • • • • I andermy • • 4 O O O O O 51 5172 Tehtcammrmication Wireless Mtenna Array 10, O fi C O D. O C O O SVMC 22.120 C C C C C C 51 5172 Telecommunication Wxeiess Support Towef O O O C O O O C O O SVMC 22 120 31 31411 Texlfie manufacture • • 71 711 Thoafer, indoor • • • • • • • 71 711 Theater, outdoor • • • 56 58292 Tiro. rump and retread marndar:turing • A Accessary Orly • Per Use T Ternpomry Permit Ronk)na~l O Condifiars Apply 7 C Combfienal Use Permil Original Message----- From: Inga Note Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 3:59 PM To: Greg McCormick Cc: Deanna Griffith; Neil Kersten; Mike Connelly; Dave Mercier Subject: RE: Rationale for requirements The less than 10 trip exemption is there so we do not overly burden the smallest projects by requiring them to hire a traffic engineer. 9 houses equates to 9 PM peak hour trips, so exempting short plats is an easy place to draw the line for residential projects. For commercial projects we usually ask the applicant to write a brief letter explaining why they expect to generate fewer than 10 trips. It would be difficult to say that a small commercial project or short plat would cause an intersection to decline below acceptable level of service since we could see a variation of 10 trips between a Tuesday vs. Wednesday traffic count. The reason it changed from 25 to 10 is because I made a mistake during the last review. Let me know if you need anything more. Chris Bainbridge From: Henry Allen dent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:17 PM o: Dave Mercier; Greg McCormick; Chris Bainbridge %c: Mike Connelly; Deanna Griffith; John Hohman Subject: RE: Rationale for requirements About the changes I requested (I hope the following is adequate)- For section 22.150.060 the existing text says - 22.150.060 Design Elements Drainage facilities within single-family or two-family residential subdivisions shall be designed as follows: 1. Continuous swales running the length of the street located between the curb and sidewalk. These swales shall, be within City right-of-way or within a border easement granted to the City; or 2. Consolidated ponds or swales that are located on a separate tract or lot owned by a homeowners association or dedicated to the City. Consolidated ponds or swales are acceptable on private commercial developments. My requested text says - Drainage facilities within single-family or two-family residential subdivisions shall be designed as follows: 1. Continuous swales running the length of the street located be the curb and sidewalk. These swales shall. be within City right-of-way or within a border easement granted to the City, or, 2. For driveways with areas over 5000 square feet or private roads - continuous swales running the length of the driveway or road and located within ~_'~)sements, or, 3. Consolidated ponds or swales that are located on a separate tract or lot ,,,~rned by a homeowners association or dedicated to the City. Swales are to be continuous around the perimeter of cul-de-sacs. Consolidated ponds or swales are acceptable on private commercial developments. In the original. text we primarily address public streets (point #1) but many of the residential developments have private roads and/or driveways which are often large enough (i.e. over 5000 square feet per section 22.150.020 Regulated Activities) to require stormwater treatment. To specifically address these latter situations, I proposed point # 2. The 5000 square foot- threshold mentioned in point 42, again, comes from section 22.150.020 Regulated Activities. My point 1#3 is the same as in the original point #i2. I added the note about swales around cul-de-sacs because we occasionally have these and the regulations sound to address linear street situations but are not explicit about how to handle the cul-de-sac bulbs. I requested pulling out the note about ponds or swales on commercial sites from the rest of the text because in the original text this item gets lost amongst the text concerning residential actions. The change for Section 22.1,50.070 Design Method was requested to add an important design criterion. When the City performed a study on sizing stormwat-er treatment facilities within the very permeable valley soils, we came up with a design method but this method applies to water depths up to a maximum of 6 inches. The County method allows depths up inches. So as to mitigate potential. design errors due to insufficient information, I ;)posed adding the criterion - The maximum depth of water in a Swale for treatment shall be six inches. 1 Thank you, Henry M. Allen City of Spokane, Valley -----Original Message----- From: Dave Mercier - ' Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 7:17 AM To: Henry Allen; Greg McCormick Cc: Mike Connelly; Neil Kersten; Deanna Griffith; John Hohman Subject: RE: Rationale for requirements Henry: Please add a little more description; i.e., an example that illustrates the effect; of the two proposed changes? Thanks. Dave -----Original Message----- From: Henry Allen Sent: Wed 9/19/2007 5:15 PM To: Greg McCormick Cc: Dave Mercier; Mike Connelly; Neil Kersten; Deanna Griffith; John Hohman Subject: RE: Rationale for. requirements Hi, The changes for Section 22.150.060 Design Elements were requested to help clarify these requirements for situations that frequently arise (driveways and private roads) but are not specifically addressed in the current proposed language. The change for Section 22.150.070 Design Method was requested to add an important desi.gn,% criterion. i Thank you, Henry M. Allen City of Spokane Valley From: Greg McCormick Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 10:31 AM To: Inca Note; Henry Allen Cc: Dave Mercier; Mike Connelly; Neil Kersten; Deanna Griffith Subject: Rationale for requirements Importance: High Inga/Henry: The City Council reviewed your recommended changes to the UDC last night and wanted the rationale for the requirements being proposed. Please provide the "why" For the proposed changes by close of business today so that information can be forwarded to Council prior to the second reading and adoption next Tuesday {9/25}. 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 09-25-07 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business Q new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: GMA Discussion GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Councilmember Rich Munson will give a discussion on the Growth Management Act (GMA). i OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS City • Spokane Valley Meffffu To: Dave Mercier From: Ken Thompson CC: Nina Regor Date: September 20, 2007 Re: Fee Resolution Update for September 25, 2007 Meeting Staff updates the fee resolution a few times each year and places it on the council agenda for review. Staff expects to propose changes for council review yet this year. Proposed changes include: 1. Switching preliminary and final short plat (2-4 lots) fees to correct what appears to be t . ! an error in the original resolution. Staff work involved for preliminary plats is greater, thus a greater fee is warranted at preliminary review. The fees for preliminary and final short plats appear to have been switched when the original resolution was prepared. current resolution proposed resolution Short Plats: Preliminary $924 $1,224 Final $1,224 plus $1011ot $924 plus $10/1ot l 2. Adding a final binding site plan fee. This fee was not dearly included with the original resolution. Staff work closely parallels the short plat process so the fee is recommended at $924 + $101iot. current resolution proposed resolution (Preliminary) Binding site plan $1,674 $1,674 Final Binding site plan - $924 + $10/lot 3. Implementing a fee for staff prepared zoning letters to citizens and organizations. We receive 20-25 requests each year. Each letter takes about three hours of research time. Citizens, .real estate agents, lending institutions and title companies are surprised we don't charge for this service because they encounter a fee when working with other governments. current resolution proposed resolution Zoning letters - $200 4. Deleting the following life/safety permit inspections/fees from our fee resolution because they fall under Fire District authority, they incur liability for the city or they are available from private enterprise. +Demolition permits for septic tank or underground flammable tanks. +Special called inspections 9 Page 2 +Mobile home location permits and inspections +Annual permits used to maintain equipment or buildings, construct or remodel small areas of assembly occupancies or install tents or membrane structures. +Minimum housing inspection fee +Special inspections requested by owner or tenant • Fire, wind, mud, and flood • Day care • Nursing homes and hospitals +Temporary tents, canopies and air supported structures for public use 5. An additional fee for hover the counter,' short tum-around permits,- of $58 (decks, minor, construction, simple projects) is under consideration and may be ready for discussion when this next comes before the council. A comparison of proposed City of Spokane Valley fees with the City of Spokane and Spokane County is attached. 0 Page 3 9-25-07 Proposed City Spokane Valley City of Spokane Spokane County Short Plats Preliminary $ 1,224 $2,810 + $351acre $ 1,104 Final $ 924 plus $10Aot $1,115+ $18/lot $ 553 Binding site plan Preliminary $ 1,674 $2,810+ $35/acre $ 1,915 plus $12/lot Final $924+ $10llot $1,820+ $171acre $ 1,473 Zoning letters $ 200 $ 355 $ 294 MEMO TO: Dave Mercier, City Manager FROM: Rick Van.Leuven, Chief of Police George Wigen, Administrative Sergeant DATE: September 1.7, 2007 RE: Monthly :Report August 2007 During the month of August 2007, computer-aided dispatch (CAD) incidents for the Spokane Valley Police Department totaled 5,034. These are self-initiated officer contacts, as well as calls for service. Out of those incidents, 1,549 actual reports were taken during the month of August. Attached is the breakdown describing those incidents. Additionally, there were 1,443) traffic stops conducted that resulted in 319 traffic reports. Included with this report are hotspot maps for August residential burglaries, August commercial burglaries and August traffic collisions, along with July and August stolen vehicles. A_D MINIST%A,T[VE : ♦ Chief VanL euven met with Deputy City Manager Nina Regor, Lt. Rob Reynolds of the Liquor Control Board and Sgt. George Wigen to discuss the City of Spokane Valley noise ordinance and nighttime noise issues. ♦ Chief VanL•euven attended a. number of roll calls this month, where he reminded patrol officers to continue to prowl check Spokane Valley parks and pools. SCOPE volunteers also regularly check these areas. ♦ The Chief attended a meeting of the Spokane Valley Businessmen's Association, where Sheriff K.nezovieh was the day's speaker. ♦ During the month of August, Chief VanLeuven was "on call" for a total of twenty-nine 12-hour shifts for patrol lieutenants. COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: ♦ As a part of community outreach, Chief VanLeuven and Spokane Valley Police officers continue to make "bank security checks", as well as visit SCOPE stations. The Chief: also attended the August nnonthly meeting ofEdgecliff SCOPE. ♦ Patrol deputies making security checks of businesses in Spokane Valley began leaving business cards with the name of the deputy and the date on the cards to let the oNvner know the business was checked and found secure. Page 1 ♦ T~Tational Night Out, a neighborhood activity with block parties and a time to "get to known your neighbor" and help fight crime, is an annual Neighborhood Watch event each August. Chief VanLeuven attended six parties in the Spokane Valley and enjoyed meeting and visiting with citizens of the community. Patrol officers and property detectives also attended many of the parties and found this a great way to interact with the people of the community they serve. ♦ In August, SCOPE volunteers and Director Rick Scott participated in several annual events, including Kids Day in the Park (with Operation Family ID), Unity in the Community (giving away and fitting bil=e helmets), and Neighborhood Night Out. ♦ During July and August, a total of 61 abandoned vehicles were tagged for impoundment in the Spokane Valley by SCOPE volunteers; 19 of which were eventually towed with 19 citations issued. In addition, 20 hulks were processed. ♦ SCOPE. Incident Response Team (SIR"1') contributed a total of 634 volunteer hours in August, (including training, standby, and response time). They responded to eleven events (fires, motor vehicle accidents, etc.) for a total of 93 on-scene hours. OPER.,kTIONS: ♦ armed Man Arrested After Bizarre Behavior Spokane Valley Police Officers arrested a 39-year-old man after he was seen naked and yelling in his owrn back yard, armed with two handguns. A witness saws the man in his own backyard, without clothing, yelling loudly and breaking items. He was described by the witness as being armed with a handgun in each hand and w=aving them around. When the man was confronted by responding officers, they also sawn him in his own back yard waving the handguns around and yelling. A taser was used to attempt to subdue the subject and was initially effective; how=ever, the subject still attempted to fight the officers. Officers eventually disarmed him and took him into custody after he was able to strike one of the officers. The subject was observed to have exhibited signs of possible Excited Delirium and was taken by ambulance to Sacred Heart Hospital. When officers checked the property and house to clear the area of any danger; they found that the mirrors in the residence were broken. The subject was arrested for Aiming/Discharging a Weapon for his actions with the handguns. Spokane Valley Police officers and all commissioned deputies of the Spokane Count), Sheriffs Office have recently completed training in the recognition and response to persons who are believed to be suffering from passible Excited Delirium. Some of the signs they are trained to watch for include bizarre behavior, sweating profusely, and the breaking of glass or mirrors. ♦ Valley= Traffic Incident Likely Road Rage, Not Cang-Related A Spokane Valley couple driving home one evening found themselves in a frightening traffic confrontation with the occupants of another car, and the incident was erroneously interpreted as an act of gang initiation. The couple made it safely home; however, in talking to a neighbor the next day, he assured them that this was a gang initiation and that ' Page 2 they Nvere lucky to have not been assaulted or killed. The couple sent e-avails relating this "gang initiation" story to their circle of friends, who its turn forwarded it to their 6iends. j Faster than a speeding bulletin, the Tnternet spread the story through hundreds of Spokane- area households. The fact of the matter is this was likely a road rage incident, one of dozens of such incidents reported each month in Spokane County. The "gang initiation'' story is urban legend that has been repeatedly investigated whenever it surfaces, and has yet to be verified by any law enforcement agency. Persons interested in investigating this urban legend in greater depth, or exploring other types of urban legends and myths, can visit the Internet site listed be.low- http://tirbanlegends. about. con>lod/crinie/&4ights_out.htm ♦ Wedding Reception Turns Into Tragedy, One Dead A 22-year-old Spokane Valley man died after being treated overnight for a head injury that he suffered at a wedding reception at CenterPlace. Spokane Valley Police Nvere called to CenterPlace about 9:30 p.m. The call originally was reported as a two-vehicle accident in which a man had fallen out of a pickup bed. However, further investigation revealed that there had been no collision. The victim and a friend had both been at the wedding reception at Center Place and both Nvere reportedly drinking alcohol, both inside the reception and outside in the parking lot. As people were beginning to leave the event, the victim apparently climbed into the bed of his -fiend's pickup. His friend, the driver, accelerated and the victini fell from the truck and struck his head. The driver moved the truck to another part of the parking lot before officers arrived, and later he and a female acquaintance hid the pickup at an apartment complex. It was only through the testimony of witnesses that the driver and the female passenger were identified by police and located by officers. Following interviews of each, officers seized the pickup and had it towed to the sheriffs impound lot as evidence. Traffic detectives were called out and assumed the lead in the investigation. SCOOTERS AND BIKES: ♦ There were no collisions involving scooters and or bikes in August. Page 3 2007 AUGUST CRIME REPORT Aug-07 Aug-06 1107 to date 06 to date 06 Total 05 Total 04 Total BURGLARY 57 8411 378 472 714 744 997 FORGERY 21 31 268 242 334 464 465 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 108 131 870 721 1,122 904 1,224 NON-CRIMINAL 80 64 563 502 811 749 915 PROPERTY OTHER 87 86 621 685 982 1,154 1,665 RECOVERED VEHICLES 54 56 251 245 403 333 390 STOLEN VEHICLES 71 71 359 412 711 603 577 THEFT 187 165, 1289 1,272 1,888 2,256 2,853 UIOBC 0 1 5 4 11 8 10 VEHICLE OTHER 0 0 1 3 3 5 40 VEHICLE PROWLING 71 113 466 620 937 958 1,382 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 736 802 5,071 5,178 7,916 8,178 10,519 ASSAULT 80 68, 598 598 846 894 880 DONSUICIDE 18 13, 152 121 167 159 164 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 73 63 580 448 736 762 755 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 2 5 1 5 KIDNAP 2 3 18 17 22 35 24 MENTAL 32 44, 254 291 425 425 386 MP 10 10 53 54 88 97 106 PERSONS OTHER 117 113 902 772 1,159 1,256 1,624 ROBBERY 2 5 46 28 58 56 58 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 6 9 54 56 83 92 190 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 340 328, 2,657 2,387 3,589 3,777 4,192 ADULT RAPE 2 3 31 15 29 39 37 CHILD ABUSE 3 8 71 53 78 101 126 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 6 10 70 80 105 88 205 SEX REGISTRATION F 2 0 3 2 3 6 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 2 0 13 14 15 9 21 CHILD MOLESTATION 4 7 31 50 69 67 77 CHILD RAPE 4 6 21 40 62 35 30 RUNAWAY 24 23 202 201 309 311 437 SEX OTHER 14 251, 136 140 203 181 162 STALKING 0 1 10 15 17 27 35 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 19 1811 109 141 177 244 341 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 80 101 697, 751 1,067 1,108 1,475 DRUG 74 50 546 464 565 891 999 ISU OTHER 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 TOTAL ISU 74, 50 547 464 665 891 1,000 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 319 298 2,481 2,063 3,345 2,403 2,776 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVE 1,549 1,579, 11,463, 10,843 16,582 16,357 19,962 7 I_. 1!'li fi~ 1d~~,~'Y Cr4~ll II I M'C"~~• I. I p;od 1 r, s t.urM~t t Jnso , 11<' tl ! - t'4' ( ~1 / " l^ _ _ Sansa n -1 j+°ta t r ( t ~C Styt1i191} T yy F!" _ ~1lTY s J ! ~,rr T o t7 ~Y 11r L NQ J e riD d I T Kra ~ r" ~ N _ rtrw.ry+a - ~ T. lra 4 r G N - - i! r3 I `n' Eudid i 1a I ~ { I ~ I }Db~+bn i.., j-= • { 1. _ eTS ni F+ MI ~wl of S 1 ~y 1 1 n I P I - I Kna a _ t+ rn I 'lnrllor.a ~u - a+ tq~ - ~T i F+ `tl ti ' ~(:dlf, .rl ' ~ - ~ ~ p 1- • i N4~_ - I ~J I c3 ° m t_ ' I i t . l - , 1~~1 - . - rA~''a i y 1 i~ L~rl tyr, , MJ;L a _ - 16 Wssion Try"'; - - _ T.. Q •8r~ 4 j lr ~'~Ir r:r'~ - L~t~O - ! CDllilt _ _ j l t+nriria_' Slwrp 1 a1~ a d n ~ l J I Ml ht 1 ` ~N~ { „t to I - P' At 111 N~".~(~ ,P""- I w ~ S LL I j~r~dinYY+'~~j 3 v f.t. t T c1 11 S ` h o 91 dont w AN 1 L... 1 III rI _ . 1 Ind X dir I~}11'r' O r ~1t{ I I '.I li r•' t ~ y rd - 'ln l d L 2- 411 6VI u _a' _ • ~sl1~ ~,p alb ,,t s) 3 I ra_ BUJ ~Ti t1F .1 ! ~,t>;T1. UUit + I P"' w 11 J j ! r I 9VI I! _,1[ ~t j` but - T ; Pt 18~ IT ~,t _ a, } 1jlr,jttr. TU:; I ! pr►dtI ~ 1 ~ r--~ 1 1 G i- I_i•_ tf~U~~.,IFi~J 1"~ ~ ~ L w D }r f a,:;, - _ 1,i~h_ ism r -j ,j loll a r, I '1 ~ If~1111 `7'I ~ \1st r~ ~ '~lrv ~ it tlr•~ -~c,t. ~ r~lpN', ti )2 .1bM ~ ~ i •t. ! 1 111 - ~ - f •111_ ~ - b "~w. , ?!w'~ r f ~ ~ _ _I ,F I,.I •'1►n ra z5th Z- I_ - 01 - ~[!t}r S- cf' y .il I I ''eStJJ) 7 ~ _ _ ' j 31x1 n t 1 4.. III 7~c Starlin rt, 4010' i~ palls tan , v ? }1 t 6 I s}' J r7S t 44M1 J Vehid" 1- v I- A 44Ui - o 44 ` ~41r / ` (S at tan' a v tt~ Low 1' '•'li f7~ hlr • "'~a ' 'I ~A:iN / '~7~1-'! T m MAA@dium !l~+j e t , ( +t f e Mu.ilu~li =Hqh y,, I. t3 i I. - , j I • I . r T 2007 July & August Stolen Vehicle Hotspots mapr,raduced tU: ptorntxtr?tH1! ~?I Jnse I Ir I 1 7t? ^I ( `.1 II ~tyt ay'l av, ' r"/ E I _ l 1.1 ~1 eT rnI1 1 s 5 Kle c ~la coif t~lirnl)oit~l n • I . I l is !''i'~}'n. _ it 1~~- ai ~lei►i ~ ^.r.t wl ~ l i Iiutk~ •e9t~GkP1'n fl _rn'J-. ~ 41 ti~jl r ,~r..Kw t':iUIC` h ~ j G~ih~~ ~ M lal>~-~ ,~•.h o" Mantgt' i 'II ,J ' 1 I room bldtanb Qr hrxla n I I, o RxlratNt 1111f I ( t ' rnit n J` SMOD 111~~ :rx ft? -Z j j ~ :ItWp Mission ryllssu;n 1t - r ,fir. .q - I"I• GrJtItM ❑~sm - I I , fiJ o d;l ta'IBtt ,h+11Sl~r I ShRr'pT ~ ~ -1•. , llll~ - '11,11..114. ~r l D ~t I 1 /11111 D l ~11tt j _ W m `yiit1 ~ Filrl~d,4y~~m 1''.~ III .I io t, 1 _ ~~,Cr - l f ' C~4JU~.) AIki I~ 1' a 1 1! ~~L►qn` ~I I~ i M~~~-..iT~ I"~ I`; 7ittll I: ~I ,LIt~ 1J,lplii i la.~, I'= ~1t~~ I , •;Ir~1~ltR , tL A 2 rl 7 3 m p n = - ;d.n! - l IirR 1 r'1. SUi g_ N; 1-I I t 71, Ii;.-its. 3• Ijn " ~ t':1 .Si~L1J~7r j lli ~;r ' _ 4 1 4 bj,t .~+t 1 ss„t, It _5 ~y I 5i i 1 1111 i - I,t IL I I i faar'sorl t ~ I1~ ~{,f. r` I sr. I I•~ ItII>. i I xr 1 lll. 4~ f' Jr. ~q J,lg• {w t I I u.- I ?°v' 3ti t'f.i'I ?t ~Ih ~U _ {-il ltlti IISi11t j -_Ij y 15._t~'/~'~ - J►oilt~1- CIL ~'d~'i7ai 1 j4111 ' ~o ~ I' s,t, j 1~ _ - s>,!.~ ' ! Y'- r. . r+'~yt IN s u l 'rj' ~521rt~tlt t' + Jonrtj~ Q{F ~r II~;.rt~I. I I S NW+ _ie n ' m PO 1 ` r'+I' ' t X111 + ~ ~ f f e ~ _ 32tu1 .fit 1- ` {N 21 .1 ,'1'.•1 I 1t ( Q L ! r j1111 JlOillrt~{ I p I tIt i y l Il~h I' T i 4giht w_ I Ot-itb Tom I :tli~:l f v - ~ t' , i j f~ -~-r-J ~ ~ jri'• - - ~ u, I I i ~r IT 144 o ResidonUal ri'rt a I 3 b-q ' i, u I - ~►u11~ kt, a - Burglary I i1Y r., 43n1dditl t . 1 1t • , 41~R ~ia 't ( f aF ti ` 1- rl~ 1t~ti w' nutK ~r 4 ~'r7-i o O INA e I I I FtMMn L - r u _ & =Law ' 1 I 1~ zQ I - e Al =Medium 'I'. ';.'rl' G„f i ~ ~ } • ,h~~ar~ i tl>~q 1bUaJiys411.1. ~ _ ; ~ 1 1 I J ~~r'n , I U TTT I t~liigh I I - ~ 2007 August Residential Burglary 14otspots IbS:tI)"'"i1CC!117SRP1,e,rt[x!r2DO? 'i ~ r ,t,) [ Ss 1 ? Pur►at Q;ry , z' - . ~ j ,J()~ qtr.. I, :~i- ~ - ('A .'~if1A0 _ /1 Wn ~ , ` ° rrrnS>4 1u : i ! - I • l L _ . - tO rj1 t _ a I .1 I • 1 l at: tI Kin nq,I too. -4 m j It,mM,fty- 4 ~FtK:lu1 li 9t'-11 a-}- a Zi I fi~fi nit. t % - I . f4 L IYIf ` t , nflt,CY~1 ~Eut i - I J j o ufl `CJtrflVl. f' ` I~1 1 y ~ iu ~ ~t, 1 le" ir o<t 1 t 1 ~ ` Gilf~t8 ~ iGiaQY 1 j .►1r►i ijt~ : 4~ , I T t-,1 twrmcm trxiw a _ r.:,y 1 4 i I 00 Ki rislOn ~ Misswrr fro Caulk 1 tt r~ l N Qr1r '`JtTI1 I 1 i V r t~j t 1. I J- _ j-- ' J • / _ _L -j - r nI _ -t -Alin r-_ ! u' ! j, I ! 1 Y.ill r.6~1 i ~ ' ~ j,-. ' I 1 .~1 ~.1yL U~ k Alk - t I 11 r • 'I - f ni :d'ri~ 7.nd 7 lh~ 1Pirz ni~~ <rl..~.i,a 2h~S 'lam I" AU C 1 )F?<ullt[ Z~, -.11N) 2rTji- ,tt~ 0 <i31 ,LLa :tlh U` ;~li II.: t fill: ~1 Wy ~A r~ j. I L. l!►_L1 14 Rttt~: r'h 111i J ~ I i l l,ut I ! f t i Fuh-1m Zi17 . - ~j I I ~ lOiFt 1 1 1-1 r 1 1.}tI Q~Jj(f[.-.y 1 (y; in !lilt I.1 'l. _I I } •1.7Y1 - 1'G $ t~S11 I Y_t tai F, u.; 1 1 Ur -ft lrl ~ t 1 I , i .4 1t,u1~ 1 1 ~4 , I f to I_ LLLI t . 1 }-fr~a is ' - aLt ~i ! 11ti1n L t I ts~~ 7~lt ,'r Gul. I.j rt,l L, Alto I ~rJ~o~q tr T r } t f _ d - ti► j { t nA , _1t ` 1 t f i fy i I l 1 ti1z fA c if ? i ~t 1i j~l 1 fi , I ~'r 41111 , . i T I~ -~Gtl1 I , low, j_ ' u ..1216! Jenn Y4}r` t r !fit ~r-~, 1 `s-.b 1r1dJ+ I -j` ` = ' ri ~3{ ~I "lit l . ,•i T1 t~V~t'r ` f ~~J L' lr if~ i ,r S"!J.t vrS~ ,[ti' u 3 3 L - . [ _ ~ 31 at Tom, a ~..P~ r• ~ r} ~ l ci 1 .1f► \ - f;2- 4011r p _ t- 13nlla 1 off 51wh r t iT 441ir a COMMOMial r}~;, r S r n Burglary b~ o LD r 11 4' 44th PL~ Y ®IMLow Med[utn 11 je r hrrp I ~ -flaj IMHtgh ,~J, ' as ,'M"` 2007 August Commercial Burglary hlotspots Mapl'rwjrn:r!d 125cltlt°nrlte12407 r Jose r t 70 5ansu bwn (c Z reds t LET , tr ` m t-~' zttllN Q L- ~ sla prin W sPrv+99 tL I $ I. ✓ ~i A 71~ •J 1~ -72 m f t I f m r r• °t 2 9 T d Kill • ° I I n Rrynnv~l' 'a 06, 1- Cuclyd - 4 - i ' T MOt yip r - 1 Ir1 - I nt _ Jt ri Ira w I aJ! i s p pgt~f.YtCie ! r L M J t- j ~tl I 1~.. r far Ala ~3 9 l- - Ct ~A } r i FC t-t'r.►. {_r 1jr}tl :t 1 I~ - P ` t rsl --1 - - j { •+u , i t ' , 3• ~ett • ~i ~Ilannrx,- Indiana ' i Te' I f 4 i_ 1'i s • + ;-Q~ _ K I+_ - r- Irldier _ 7 A~i~ilsl ~'J~ ~ •~L'J11 _ I 7'sS-~.iV mat t`' l 1~119ato _ _ %ssion -"i-F 1 r ; ! P I Tl', T - L ~i r r.,t C" ~do Catnk y~ p tt t 2 '3= EBr _ 1~'- ufbr r _ - - I ,rr7 _ 1 1 I I t Y Ri-Ti r ~ ~•I 't ~z- RJL',ec - I ZM1 -i 1 - do 411 ' IF . ai I ` o t}t 1 ~h F w - - 'In __1-,f 'rh -1 j' ; •T H1h• - i J ~'r. T, d i ~ ~ ~ '•,l (,Its I ~ . i'it. j tC11- Ir1• , ~ ~ lltti i tl - - - i ~ I~ -lot- 11th °i_rl - I I Pratr: f I3 - `a -dam 1- m +:,lit y t ~~►~iI u fah tr. 1 x~~_.'' yp 1s1 C: Pon T~ jull "-T to ' r~r f _ ` E r S- 2711 L) _ Jenn Qa ~1r.-~ ~1 ' r 1g - :t: 25tlr ~ ~ t•P~` ~ ~ ti~~ 1 ~.:~'y? `fl ~Qij u 2 31 sl s 1, t ~r ` 1 t1~~'~' ;-.~r I 39~ D $lsTrL I m r~ r 321 t7-; O AUI - ' M 8Oft Term ~ u m m ,sal=I a . ` 1 ; 1 gal Traffic t-i 1 ~y ` bk i ' N 44th c~ Collisions B t IV 4A11, _ m i a0 I f~ Low f I Pty ' ra o l IMMedium Low ti")' -~t m! I 9 I5 I IMMedium `real ! ~Moh t,4ll! =High ' °r, ; M'°l 2007 August Traffic Collision "otspots Mal' Produced 12 Solilpintx-r2W7 1 ~ S#611a-ne Valley 4;oo* 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhatl@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: September 14, 2007 Re: August Report f=inance employees worked in the following areas during August: Second amendment for 2007 bud et Proposed amendments include setting aside dollars for the eventual replacementlimprovement of city facilities (depreciation), purchasing the police precinct building at a discount and transferring dollars to the Civic Facilities Fund for the acquisition of additional facilities. These amendments were approved by ordinance on September 11. 2008 Budget preparation Key provisions of the 2008 budget include a records management system, a city center area environmental impact statement, the annual contribution for facilities replacement (depreciation) and the implementation of the initial year of the departmental business plans. One additional hearing is scheduled for October 9. Budget variance/investment reports Reports showing a comparison of revenues and expenditures, to the 2007 budget, at August 31, are attached. Staff provides information on selected operating funds at month end and a more complete report quarterly. Sales tax receipts continue to be slightly more than our estimates but the increase is less than we have seen in recent years. Gambling tax receipts are less than our budget.. We have two significant accounts that have fallen behind. We will continue to monitor these accounts but collection is unlikely. Investment income and park/recreation income are exceeding our estimates. The investment report is attached for your review. 2006 Comprehensive annual Financial report An outside accountins firm has been hired to complete this project. This report is the document that is audited by the state each year. We expect to have a draft of the report in September. Annual audit The State Auditor's Office has completed preliminary work on the 2006 audit. The full audit will tike several months to complete. Vacant position The vacant Accounting Manager position is being advertised. Finance has been short at least one position since early 2006. i City of Spokane Valley Selected Operating Funds Budget Variance Report Year to Date at Aug 31, 2007 Unaudited Amended Budget August YTO Unrealized Percent R007 Revenues Revenues Revenue Rem General Fund Revenues: Unreserved Fund Balance S 7,058,000 S - S 7,068,000 S - 1 Property Tax 9,745,000 56,254 5,169,559 4,575,441 53.05 Sales Tax 17,686,800 1,791,355 11,243,665 6,443,135 63.57 Gambling Tax 910,000 121,835 347,734 562,266 38.21 2 Franchise FeeslBusiness Licenses 724,170 5,307 477,492 246,678 65.94 State Shared Revenues 1,121,000 1,105 664,569 456,431 59.28 Planning 8, Building Fees 1,867,000 185,916 1,495,085 371,915 80-08 Fines and Forfeitures 1,250,000 105,763 814,949 435,051 65.20 Recreation Program Fees 177,700 34,802 154,697 23,003 87.06 Center Place 230,000 44,179 243,064 (13,064) 105.68 Investment Interest/Other 302,800 81,888 378,912 (76,112) 125.14 4 Operating Transfers 115,000 2,172 47,565 67,435 41.36 General Fund $ 41,197,470 $ 2,432,913 S 28 106,674 S 131090,796 68.226 Other Fund Revenues: Street Fund S 7,658,000 $ 198,712 $ 1,587,090 $ 6,070,910 20-72% HoteUMolel Fund 658,000 58,414 256,169 401,831 38.93 Stonlweater Fund 3,195,762 16 656 962,920 2,232,842 30.13 Other Funds $ 11,511,762 S 273,782 S 2,806,179 $ 8,705,583 Amended Budget August YTD Unrealized Percent 2007 oendiiures Fxpenditures Fxgenditwes Realized General Fund Expenditures: Legislative Branch 296,393 12,107 164,139 132,254 55.38 Executive R Legislative Support 892,854 67,630 480,894 411,960 53.86 Public Safety 18,256,400 1,413,395 11,446,828 6,809,572 62.70 Operations & Administrative Svcs 1,470,608 87,326 702,371 768,237 47.76 Public Works 1,391,887 84,648 693,194 698,693 49.80 Planning a Community Dev. 2,411,276 192,934 1,409,816 1,001,460 58.47 Library Services 20,000 - 4,559 15,441 - Parks 8 Recreation 2,087,086 172,978 1,044,878 1,042,208 50.06 General Government 12,063,000 123,596 4,100,907 7,962,093 34.00 5 S 38,889,504 $ 2,154,613 $ 20 047,585 $ 18 841,919 51.55% Other Fund Expenditures: Street Fund $ 4,326,372 S 620,818 S 2,069,137 S 2,257,235 47.83% HoteUblotel Fund 658,000 25,206 145,364 512,636 22.09 6 Stornwraler Fund _ 2,240,3D9 63,725 936,474 1,303,835 41.80 $ 7 224 681 S 709,748 S 3,150,975 S 4,073,705 911712007 1:53 PIA City of Spokane Valley Investment Report For Month of August 2007 Total LGIP' F&M MM F&M CD Investments Beginning $ 34,887,691.17 $ 1,610,882.64 $ 1,000,000.00 $ 37,498,573.81 Deposits 2,038,887.71 - - 2,038,887.71 Prior Months Adj 5,486.42 5,486.42 Withdrawls - - - - Interest 157,345.76 5,512.36 26,183.01 189,041.13 Ending $ 37,089,411.06 S 1,616,395.00 $ 1,026,183.01 $ 39,731,989.07 Balances by Fund General Fund $ 10,409,821.12 Street Fund 4,265,354.28 Arterial Street 786,646.70 Paths & Trails 22,978.53 Hotel/Motel 502,493.96 Center Place Op 332,284.21 Service Level Stab. 5,145,622.28 Winter Weather Res. 551,012.44 Capital Projects 4,399,932.32 Spec. Capital Proj. 4,629,640.16 Mirabeau Point Proj. 358,708.43 Parks Capital Proj. 779,234.98 Civic Bldg. Cap. Proj. 5,120,702.62 Stormwater Mgmt. 1,618,123.82 Equipment Rental 794,121.90 Risk Management 15,311.32 $ 39,731,989.07 `Local Government Investment Pool "Subject to adjustment FOOTNOTES Note: 1 Error on beg. Bal. of amended budget 2 Two accounts delinquent 3 Received quarterly 4 City estimate was too low 5 Large part of this budget is reserves, emergency use only 6 Most expenditures come in fall and early winter ~N~ Spod09!111010~ e ~ Valley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT August 2007 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION: • Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal • Street Sweeping - AAA completed the Spring Sweeping in mid-June. • Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair contract -Poe Asphalt Paving Inc. has been working on Paving and Shouldering projects. • Landscaping Services - Spokane ProCare is maintaining sprinkler systems and mowing the grass and weeds in swales. • Vactoring Contract -AAA Sweeping is cleaning drywells. • Engineering Services Support - Agreements with private engineering firms. • Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interlocal • Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal • Safety Plan - Contract with CH2M Hill. Plan in final-draft review. )WASTEWATER: • County is in the process of updating their Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for their Wastewater Facilities Plan and beginning their RRP process for a new treatment plant. A 45 day comment period started on September 12 1h for the Spokane River and Lake Spokane Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/tmdl/spokaneriver/dissolved_oxygenlindex.html CAPITAL PROJECTS: • City Hall Project Council approved the ranking of the consultants for City Hall and authorized negotiations of a contract with Bernardo Wills PC - GGLO. • Valley Corridor Project Project on hold pending outcome of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Sub Area Plan. • Street Master Plan Consultant presented phase 1 of the draft Street Master Plan report to Council on 17 July. Phase II presentation scheduled for October 16. • Pines/Mansfield The County and State are holding at final designs of their respective areas of the project. The County Right of Way Dept. is continuing their work on the right-of-way acquisition process. Twenty-two (22) out of twenty-three (23) properties have acquired right of way agreements and only one is still in the negotiations. The project is scheduled to advertise for bids in the fall of 2007 with construction scheduled to begin in 2008. • Appleway Avenue Reconstruction - Tschirley to Hodges This project is currently being advertised, with partial construction potentially scheduled to begin in 2007. Bid opening is on 9/21/07 • Barker Road Bridge Project Design is at 90% complete. Received environmental acceptance for project. Awaiting completion of the environmental permit process. Including Corps of Engineers 404 permit and the DOE 401 permit. Requesting ROW funding from WSDOT. This project is scheduled to advertise late fall or winter in 2007 with construction scheduled to begin in 2008. Staff is preparing a presentation to council on options for architectural treatments for the bridge. CONSTRUCTION • Argonne Road Overlay Project Project complete. Project closeout has begun. • Barker Road Project Project complete. Punch list items remain. • Veradale Heights Sanitary Sewer Project Project complete. Awaiting final billing. • Vera Terrace Sanitary Sewer Project Project complete. Punch list complete. Awaiting final billing from Spokane County. • Spaldings Sanitary Sewer Project The projects design is 90% complete with a bid date scheduled for 2008. ; • Trentwood Sanitary Sewer Project The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on July 9, 2007. The project is approximately 30% complete. • Grandview Acres Sanitary Sewer Project The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on June 5, 2007. The project is approximately 50% complete. TRAFFIC: • Worked with WSDOT to improve the signal timing at the Pines Interchange. Implemented two new timing plans for weekdays. • Continued working with SRTC on revisions to the regional travel demand model. • Received equipment order for school beacons. Surveying work is mostly complete and locations are being checked for utility conflicts. • 17 Construction and utility work related traffic control plans were reviewed and approved. • 26 New citizen requests/complaints were received via phone and email. These typically involve traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concerns, streetlight outages, requests for new streetlights, traffic count requests, and parking issues. STORMWATER: • Continued inventory of UIC facilities (le drainage structures). • Met with DOE to discuss NPDES Phase II requirements for the City. DOE requested more GIS data. • Began work on stormwater informational brochures. S061&ne *Va11ey PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT August 2007 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION: • Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal • Street Sweeping - AAA completed the Spring Sweeping in mid-June. • Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair contract -Poe Asphalt Paving Inc. has been working on Paving and Shouldering projects. • Landscaping Services - Spokane ProCare is maintaining sprinkler systems and mowing the grass and weeds in swales. • Vactoring Contract -AAA Sweeping is cleaning drywells. • Engineering Services Support - Agreements with private engineering firms. • Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interlocal • Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal • Safety Plan - Contract with CH2M Hill. Plan in final-draft review. WASTEWATER: • County is in the process of updating their Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for their Wastewater Facilities Plan and beginning their RRP process for a new treatment plant. A 45 day comment period started on September 12'*" for the Spokane River and Lake Spokane Dissolved Oxygen Total Maximum Daily Load. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/tmdl/spokaneriver/dissolved-oxygen/index.html CAPITAL PROJECTS: • City Hall Project Council approved the ranking of the consultants for City Hall and authorized negotiations of a contract with Bernardo Wills PC - GGLO. • Valley Corridor Project Project on hold pending outcome of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Sub Area Plan. • Street Master Plan Consultant presented phase 1 of the draft Street Master Plan report to Council on 17 July. Phase II presentation scheduled for October 16. • Pines/Mansfield The County and State are holding at final designs of their respective areas of the project. The County j Right of Way Dept. is continuing their work on the right-of-way acquisition process. Twenty-two (22) out of twenty-three (23) properties have acquired right of way agreements and only one is still in the negotiations. The project is scheduled to advertise for bids in the fall of 2007 with construction scheduled to begin in 2008. • Appleway Avenue Reconstruction - Tschirley to Hodges This project is currently being advertised, with partial construction potentially scheduled to begin in 2007. Bid opening is on 9/21/07 • Barker Road Bridge Project Design is at 90% complete. Received environmental acceptance for project. Awaiting completion of the environmental permit process. Including Corps of Engineers 404 permit and the DOE 401 permit. Requesting ROW funding from WSDOT. This project is scheduled to advertise late fall or winter in 2007 with construction scheduled to begin in 2008. Staff is preparing a presentation to council on options for architectural treatments for the bridge. CONSTRUCTION • Argonne Road Overlay Project Project complete. Project closeout has begun. • Barker Road Project Project complete. Punch list items remain. • Veradale Heights Sanitary Sewer Project Project complete. Awaiting final billing. • Vera Terrace Sanitary Sewer Project Project complete. Punch list complete. Awaiting final billing from Spokane County. • Spaldings Sanitary Sewer Project The projects design is 90% complete with a bid date scheduled for 2008. • Trentwood Sanitary Sewer Project The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on July 9, 2007. The project is approximately 30% complete. • Grandview Acres Sanitary Sewer Project The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on June 5, 2007. The project is approximately 50% complete. TRAFFIC: • Worked with WSDOT to improve the signal timing at the Pines Interchange. Implemented two new timing plans for weekdays. • Continued working with SRTC on revisions to the regional travel demand model. • Received equipment order for school beacons. Surveying work is mostly complete and locations are being checked for utility conflicts. • 17 Construction and utility work related traffic control plans were reviewed and approved. • 26 New citizen requests/complaints were received via phone and email. These typically involve traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concerns, streetlight outages, requests for new streetlights, traffic count requests, and parking issues. STORMWATER: • Continued inventory of UIC facilities (ie drainage structures)- • Met with DOE to discuss NPDES Phase II requirements for the City. DOE requested more GIS data. • Began work on stormwater informational brochures. • Provided maps and lists of high priority drainage structure locations to be vactored. • Through POE Asphalt contract, completed installation of pipe sumps to alleviate problems with flooded areas- • Continued landscaping contract services of City owned drainage swales and ponds STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY: City 2007 budget is $3,523,202 (52.656,191 in the Street Fund and $867,011 in the Stormwater Fund) Through the end of August private contracts have invoiced $927,042 and the County has invoiced $908,263, for a total Street Maintenance cost of $1,835,305. The County has invoiced $5,925 and private contracts have invoiced $426,461, for a total Stormwater Maintenance cost of 5432,386 The overall total is ¢2.267,691 or 64 36% of the budgeted funds. STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE PERCENTAGES ;zer aenuig 6uage'. { rrd18 slre_t t,lq;rilCrR nLI 51,255,511 5927.042 15 5-a "A _ 26 31 Coulity Stormwalt'r Maintenance e25 County StrW Mair le-,ri-)r e 5908,263 25. 7 B rm f!vdii, Storrmnrater Maintenance ■ Pmate strew MAhhff o-_ 5426.461 • County Street MaVdartance 12 '0% GPnvate Stormwater MaOena-icr OCounty 5tormwaler Maintenance • Remaining Budget Listed are four, City of Spokane Valley streets we re-paved/overlayed with new A/C Asphalt in August, .1 Cataldo. East of Banker 7 051 square yards new A/C = 568,676 74 2 Vista, North of Trent 10 386 square yards new A,~C = $92,471 83 3 Theirman, North of Broadway 7,871 square yards new A/C = $85,181.60 4 8th Street, West of Carnahan 6.174 square yards new AJC = $66.928.40 These prices are with all extras included, such as, saw cutting, excavation, traffic control and overhead. A significant amount of full-depth A/C patching (city wide) and various sub-contractor activities were also accomplished in the month of August. S pokane Valley Capital Improvement Projects 2006 G :007 PRUJLGIIS _ Proposed Estimated Design Construction 2006 (211071 Total Project Cuet Funding Road Construction Projects Project Location Bid Ode Completion Orate Cunwww Complew Funding I P(U) Argonne Road Overlay Indiana Avenuo to Montgomery Avautro Mar-00 Wig/ 100% 100% $ 310,800 3 310,0041 Road Design Projects i iti1CMAQ PineWMansifeld Projed Wilbur Rd to Pines Rd., Pities to 190 Nov •07 971108 95% 0% S 1,037_015 S 4,531.04A i P(U) Appleway Avenue Reconabudion Tsdufty Rd. to Hodges Rd- Sep-07 9111011 100% 0% 3 009,000 $ 6.099,51filt HR tlarkor Road Widge Roptacemonl Barker Rd of Spokane River Dec-07 1211100 90% 0% 3 098,101 S 10,000,000 Sewer Projects Ity Veradale HorghL. • Pavobock Valleyway to Maasion, Evergroon to Adams Mar-06 011107 100% 100% T 430.256 S 43D.2:-G City Vera Terrace - Paveback 2nd to 7th, Evergreen to Butni; May-06 511107 100% 100% i 341,264 S r+1.7tf4 :.ty Spaidings - Pavebock Indiana Wes( of Monlgwrtary May-01 1 1111107 90% 0% i S .;Ity Grandview Antes • Pa"back Apr-07 1111107 100% 50% S S r7Ity 1 rm nlwood Pwmback Apr-01 1111107 100% 30% 3 $ Planning Projects Tf'Itl, Valley Cunldw Lnvuunrnental !;!udy Uil cr;Ity to AI)plewaY r,t Jim 07 tJ'n D"{, S Pal I "ahoy i ..giit•t f'lo'ck: _ Total S 3.625,236 $ 21,716,736 .if (t!! ..uria:.v I una.rut.tiutn -'cn~ram IUltsu+l, I III - il.rn,poltatn-m art/rlownnunt :Juuld- HHAC firklge R.zl-•lal;elnew Advisoy i~ottunltttx, i_umawnlty Dovulupmonl LWL;i. Graid i'ri-Ntam :!,tAl Cnnilct:,tlun 11;;na0r.mt+:111A:r Uualrty f nstlra- f,-lA Svok.tne Ilanlal Authunly lrl:yns ,~,t:,l'I,''tur.I r':n1c•;a!: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 2007 MONTHLY REPORT LONG RANGE PLANNING: Planning Commission The Spokane Valley Planning Commission met four times during the month of August and continued their review of Titles 19 and 22 and the zoning map of the Uniform Development Code. The staff Is also working on bringing forward Comprehensive Plan amendments to the Planning Commission for public hearing in the month of October and study sessions in the month of September Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan The City continues work with ClearPath USA for real estate advisory services and with Gibbs Planning LLC for services to assist In seeking out City Center developers. City staff worked with FTH to go through the Administrative Draft of the Sub-Area Plan to work through to a Public Hearing Draft The next draft is expected In 5-6 weeks Urban Growth Area Update Long Range Staff continued to participate in the update of Spokane County's UGAs by attending weekly `Planning Directors' meetings during the month of August to move the update through the regional planning process. Staff also supported a regular meeting of the Steenng Committee of Elected Officials and a subcommittee meeting of the Steering Committee. CURRENT PLANNING: We are now able to supply current revenue data for June. July and August. During the month of August Planning Division staff conducted 10 land use pre-application meetings and processed 10 home profession permits. 2 temporary sign permits and accepted applications for boundary line adjustments, preliminary and final short plats, and rezones. Six public hearings were conducted by the Hearing Examiner In August Planning Division staff also reviewed and approved 18 commercial building permits including Office on Mirabeau Parkway, storage for RVs Northwest. residential care on Adams, Office on Knox, storage for Ecolite, Kohl's department store, quilting business at 16909 E. Sprague, storage for Lydig Construction on E. Montgomery, conducted 19 commercial pre-application meetings and receivea 6 new permit applications 2007 Licenses & Permits Issued =n - 20 - - - 1 tAd 0 - Jon Feb Mar Apr May !ur ~j! Aug Sap Crt Nov Dec © 2007 57 - 1 -13 1 18 18 20 16 15 18 - 20061 44 ~ 25 38 ~ 34 32 23 32 35 24 21 19 60 2005 41 26 18 34 21 19 1 a 22 22 45 39 36 Page 1 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development August 2007 Monthly Report 2007 New Land Use Actions i 40 - - 30 t - - / - - r Kt 10 - - - - Jan F. D Ma Apr i,'jy" $@C NGo Dec 0 2007 16 27 I 17 .2 18 15 9 14 - - 2008 20 18 l 30 I 24 27 15 25 20 1.7 1 19 9 I 5 - J j 2005 15 22 20 24 16 33 28 17 17 26 18 20 2007 Planning Revenuf:;' $50.000 - - S40.000 - - - - $30,000 - - - - - $20,000 5'0 occ Jan Fet Mar Ap•;! May June Jury Aug Sap p Reverue 2' 10 r- - Revenue 2006 -6 Reverue 2.N1 BUILDING DIVISION We are now able to su,p - permits in August 2007, compareu wsui 3bi fur cne samu penod last ;r 2007 CONSTRUCTION PERMrTS e00 - - - - aJ0 - - rY0 Un 4pi A1h Auu Ah Ata 34p W M n= rJ IOQi +ra n! ;11 _ aw • 3.1 _ _ :N - W 311 3d c 7^O6 a 71 )6J :3L' Dt•-_- t-- l N NT 3+1 }S ll~ tr3 Page 2 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development August 2007 Monthly Report 2007 New Structures/Uri is Permitted so I L son Fe0 Mar Apr May -""e il.'> Aig Sept Oct Nov Dec a New 1 3 2 Dwelling Un to 26 32 53 59 75 46 48 i 50 - - alMulti-famlly Unite 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 I - C New Cammervs6l SCruclu'es 1 6 1 11 4 6 11 5 «T The building revenue for the month of August is $163,535, last year 5218 754 - - 1007 euedinp Rownnuse O BY~~ R.wir_u cx xt - " s✓ 7JQlta M+~_r e: The reported value of construction, including new structures and additionstatteration is shown In the following chart, comparing these values with 2006. New value for August 2007 totals $16,051,031, 2007 Valuation of Construction s: 0aw = 000 i ~ I • 1 1a--lei Am Fab ue `a M" Aun hJY A,; Seoi --r-t few r*r In August 2007, building inspectors performed 1,346 inspections In 23 days. This averages 58.52 inspections per day. The Plans Examiners reviewed 116 projects in August 2007 At the end of August. therm were 21 projects awaiting review Page 3 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development August 2007 Monthly Report 2001 Building E7»pacbons - - acc prim yr r~ Mli Ar YN J_~ Fr: i. 41w .a. 1a4nEtw~ta-sT 1!' 111 1 11 0248MOCM\t Q: l.\ ql ~7! '771 "CE •.tp -'71I.t 1"V 7af A~ i6 M• 1K \1 Y! la/ \tt \t7CL tCZ !/t it! There were 388 right-of-way inspections were performed during the month of Aua _st ; CC 7 CODE COMPLIANCE: The number of 'Violations Repo: zed on the fcilo~ hg chart reflects actuai SpoKane Va ley Zoring C,-,e violations, plus complaints received which were not violations. The complaints received are added to the total because they reflect time officers spent in the field conducting investigations In addition, the 'Investigated' and "Pending' columns accurately reflect Code Compliance's current ability to process and investigate backlog cases The following chart provides a monthly comparison of the types of Spokane Valley Code violatic-ts reported. Violations are reported based on the primary complaint received, rather than the numoer r-f additional violations identified on any Individual premises. The Investigation of a complaint of junk vehicles, for example, might also result In Identification of additional violations such as the accumuir:! of trash or harboring of livestock These are _,t ncluded n ?he summary A total ,^'r-l new cnm^1.~ were processed in Augus,. I h= Spciwa-iie V@,, e'.! ho!'ce Depa,!me,il, Ir. SCOPE r a'_'r5i= the a;s s?: -ce of Code Compliance in identifying junk vehicles abandoned within the right-of-way SCOPE volunteers tag the vehicles. Vehicles which have not been moved by the following Friday are towed Activity is consolidated into the following six categories, Environmental (sewer/septic, critical areas animal and nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way• property use, dangerous bu;ldin. landlord/tenant, illegal business and signage violations). Junk Auto; Solid Waste (solic City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development August 2007 Monthly Report it e vciiwons Reported 74 67 51 59 50 31 30 I 5e 79 71 80- 53 71 ■ 4Cateanente 42 58 48 45 33 30 14 1 18 62 42 48 51 n File Transfisrs 0 0 0~ 0 0 2 D 2 0 10 0 6 2 O Pending Flies 66 1 5J 47 4-1114 1 1 36 sS 60 61 l bb 25 47 f 46 • Volations Reported ■ Abatements 13 File Transfers /Pen"g Files 2007 Code Violations by Category Sao - - - 1 80 } - - 60 - - - - 40 2 o I~ u ' ! 0 o Conwint • No Violation I 11 5 7 10 10 10 3 5 ■ SoOd Waste 7 11 15 tS 13 10 16 18 v is I 11 m .:Jnk Auto l 5 5 6 I 4 9 L~5 ■ Gear View Triangle 1 1 3 2 7 a Property 6 38 41 1 31 126 21 o a,,0onmentel 0 0 6 4 2 t 2 I 1 I DEVELOPMENT ENGINEERING Page 5 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development August 2007 Monthly Report The Development Engineers processed 28 files in August. Commemal Apps from Numenca Credit Union, Cottage Inn Caf6 Goal Seal Mechanical Spokane Islamic Center, ClarkTrentic o Commercial ■ Commercial Pre-Apps u Final Plat o BSP ■ Land Use Pre-App ■ REZ/SUB ■ SHP o REZ ■ BLA ■ STV ❑ CUP CUSTOMER SERVICE Planning Tne Hearing Examiner held 6 counter and handled " Building: Permits The following table - PLUS system, measured from the true that the application is deemed 'counter-complete" to the time that a permit is issued. Page 6 of 7 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development August 2007 Monthly Report Commerelal Timshame Summary sibmittal to Issuance Aug-07 D d a Value < S NEW CONSTRUCTION Mercantile 3 $10,211,553.00 90 54 10a Miscellaneous I Office-'Professional 1 _5226,128 00 39 39 39 Structure 1 545 000.00 56 56 56 REMODEL Mercantile 7 5350,816.00 35 3 80 Office/Professional 3 552.915.00 132 30 59 Recreational Sutidin 1 12540 1 1 1 structure 1 146000 1 1 1 Values shown are those on which Plan Check and Building Permit fees are based The chart Includes average, minimum and maximum times. The Permit Center has been tracking turnaround for Right of Way Permit Applications and the faxed Mechanical and Plumbing Permit Applications. At present the City responds to applications within 24 hours, typically by noon on the following day Permits for those application tyoes are generally issued within two days. Building: Inspections Inspections are conducted the day following the inspection request except for weekends and holidays Code Compliance All preliminary investigations are conducted with ,n 24 hours except those received on Friday which are investigated before the Era of the next business day Permit Center There were no surveys renirned rlurr.ct the month of August Page 7 of 7