2006, 08-15 Study Session
AcLNnn
CITY UF SPUKAl~`F. VALLFY
CIT1-' COtfNCIL N~"ORKSHT..ET
STUDY SESSION
'I'uesday, :1agust 15, 2006 6:00 p.m.
CTI'Y IIALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Spragnc Aveaae, Ftrst Fioor
(Plc&w Tura ORAq Flertrnaic Ikvica During the Nicetiag)
DLSC.'CfSSION I.EADER SUHJF:(`TIAI~T[VI'I'Y G4AL
F,mplr»t - e b rrrrxfirt~tiun: Suntmer and Part-Time F.mplat•e t InlruclucJioRS -Af1,Ea Jackson
I
1. Nlembets of Gir) Scoul Ttoop 92 Petsce Pole Aruject E'resentati~~n'Intc~rni.~tic~n
(15 minutrs)
Kcn Thompsan 1'20 ►niiiutCS) "UUG E3udget RcvcciuC Csticuntcs; Discussivn/Lifarmativn
2007 Prcliminary Rcvrnucs/Fxprndituros
h~iil.r ,fack,<»i (3Q mirjute,) Aquecic.~ l ~pdare [)iscuysion,'1nformfltinn
d. Tom tichalirns (?tl minu(c.5) :'111 Hnr.atd NSitigation Plan Ui,cussicmrinformution
5. Tom 5chotccn.s/Morgan Right-af-Way F'roccss Discussioru'infarnyAtinn
Koudclka (20 ntinutrs)
6. Utputy Muyor Taylor Taurism CaaLs Report Uiscussionllnformation
Mayor WiUiitc (5 minutes) Advance Agenda Additians Discussioa/Infotmat.ion
.4. lnformatinn 4rrfv: (Tfcrse itims will nnt be disrussed or reportert upon. I
u. FEhL4 F7ood Plain Maps - Mtvinu Sukvp
b, Barkcr Roud Dridge ProJect - StrtiY Ty'orley
c•. l.cxl,qing Tmc Re►•e=nur - C'crry Url.ske!!
1.). Mayor Wilhitc Council Chcck in C)isc ussioit/1n fUrntniion
10. D+nvc Mrrcicr Ciry Munngcr Couunettts Discussionllntiormsuirrn
,votc. Unlw atherwise nofed abwe, there will bc na pualic cammentit at Council Stndp 5ettioam Hawevu. Council xtwaps rCSCrvea
tbc right to requcst information frnm t6e public aad stnRas appropriate.
,:01'1CF: lndividmalf plannmg tn tttend thc mretmg wlxo teqqlre r{rccial ai3utan_e tn occmnmodatt physicni, hennng, nr nther impaim►rrtts, pltnee cnntrcs
(RL CI:Y CICIROIISOtII I2I'II.Wo ux wdn us ~ntisibie 511 Uiz1 urazl~rmcnti i^av be rnade
~tU.t! `..°.:ion r1iMi?a Lit!i:i I4~.'iilih !'arG 1 ,,f 1
► -
.
:r•nrx }t7fn arc nlrrn rlar.ird cn unnn.cm,vr:~c slrrwi 1ata1L;ns, u~ : a: ku, i,Jn~. msiu,asarics. " . ♦
:,rnb nnJ Sciursis. l7r eny datc r.wr bc clxsen to deLkoor apiacc tn peacr ~ i••• f~ ~L J~ .
f lsnslttg a Nce lblr is e war w luing (xnphe tnpshv Gom mmiy goetoes a! the mma:wuty. Enrry w
itnce ftile deelkaiinn cr.remnnr b a wvque nuronme af the ytnRd apedence n( :!wne wltn plas
r. NKD as tlu:se «ha ouerul. Hoe rtte somr wqgesclons tn cntmkkr in the cmnUnd of
yiuit Fijcr R:lr dtdlntiin caEmrnry:
• liivrie yriur cnn►nsunlty tn Exutklpotr in the ern~arxxl~, lnelu~ -
fiYl
chikfren mad wcuor catmn. trpasrncst.et a( %utam Wth
::nmmuruuts rxVur cihnic groups. iduook, dubs. ucwb nnd
mnlla Communltr Ic:1cn oad cktq kwe tn tx *slid W make
• Fxpiahn the IJwry md mipn oC the thnce Pok 1'm)en, how ynu ,~t~
',ra»ed ahaut l1, M'RY the i'at~n~fnt Im'&i~s "e~e Q1eCdl. aptl
; I ir ygn:Ilcmtue a( the we xcul dnte • • ~i ' ~ ~
•:_nonzc an lnsplnng splr~ttw IASeW, hun1S puem oc prsrcr fcu the :Waslan. • .
~
• Ha.c the pxaoe mmr.ss%vs en t}►e lbk rnmi la the (aur (or morc)
. idkRUi InnW,.gea hr dnisnocnl tndi-iclual, wlth. mnntc,►m tn
ew:h 1~[IduayF otcuinur ~
• lnYue kKal gmu~i io puuvklc m:arainmei►~. sueh ma ehuKh chak ~
,,r . chlldcen'M doiuin6 whnd k 1s nla w cad with evayooc ,r, tM~
akt1B![IB tUiGlZ1Ct.
• tinme ileare itiks nrr ,4ady p1omd b tk giuund Mtt w ttu ' .
.zjanmy on1 unvrilnl duifng tbe dnikatioa. Or rnu amy dnx»c r;. ~ ~ ♦i/ ~~1
t) tuvt 4 g i nu p r l o ntin g, piand t t g, whut evetTnne pete m hwvc a
,tiu.eUul ai ntfh. tlraoe fkmr* or uthcr kcma moy tx (lionud elan6
wH1t youe P'sa ihk
• ,1 dnlicndon pLqiw can }nnnr ymu organlsaunn wd the ~
LLUnmunltJex ytw sure ~
• I'lan a rcttiiallon taemnrry (nr the lQlkprdctb Y~
r.' `y,+~
t.'I ;n, ~t~c tmpcvwnt pan es m hnkl a p~ayv 4st wnrid ;rcace In yonir hesn nnd xnd u "f^► ~
.ii.i. ili< id 1.~u wlll nwkt li ex_{~l. nncl N~ut ~xgw:lr~lion wlEl he arrn m(iuri af ine p,hirJ _*i+ '
Lc'f Us Kriutiti
F1ease mnd u►iormorbn ond a phoio N ~
nF rout Paoco Pob tiodkotfon b: ' r ~ R ~ -
~~••~,~i ~~1 ~3►.. A
Tlte Wbrid Ponto Prctyar Sociey TM ` . _ T1 1(1 ;
2e oento, aoad r~
Wiaucic, Nv 12592 usa '
infoQwar{dperxe.orp lk
www.warldpooco.arp
~
Mm' Pcate Prevuil on Farth! ~ . . .
I~ •
TH E P EAC F PO Lt P R0 J E CT Th..~.~ r I,Ar n., ,oh„mi, ..is,, .tu1,or ux U&s Ladi
piar ihr. p,crycc 'ALn~ fNucr 14:wli iyi !'u»6' In u u:lJcre-it
AT<catr iblc It ul uucnuu4) uully4cn6nacd eynthol n( tlic hopcs asul d:eartr. o[ Ll-c cntue 4ngLmF A cuuutirtl Irac fik la Aout elgtu fccL mU Rjr.
hianw 1rm01t stptxlung rigd in sdtnt pnrycr br pcKe uu caitlt Eaictt Ilucc tuk bon tkx -0ucJ. r4b Qw. Irotuun 'pianted" 4i dic groun3 Uxlc.a • ~~i
mcsW Afrry Frurc Prcvnit rnr bmh Li diQunu iuguages nn cxh ct us bw or shc slda- tUur M.vcc }lila sre suMwnnl hy vancls _•J
nic moa Ihars 25{},000 Inirc Ebks ln tuastr crcty .:uunu7 In ilw warSd ifcckauat a+ trxFnu-
I mults 4i pc'aLY WAaa is o P+ace IS b Unporwiu i}LU u iYncc fbJc bc maie 1rtm v murAd thai
I Pob Mada Ofi 1s rnvltna~menl~llr s,~w~ui L~ the Uulucl Swtn. mun flrscc
' liiur ~Trtpalatla, lc aivlicJ oi r~uu r k4~c Ndc a1 tpch ul rr,;r :mw+ m;tiltglu ilu (5~3~ ucr s~ode lcvm wstrm cc~w, o»n~~l dui C~ ~~icw-
u~irmru wcwk y.~u So Im m~iry uwnaxs tu Unag maw wadd ~c aimLgh uuu< <Yacr afik rc,aurcc Ftoct Ibks quq 1: +tAle leum any Wcal horJ ~ Yau 1ta.x ibbcs »auW cynibialax your mksnn mid simultatsroutih llnk rau wak wttb dwi Nc~a1. or Gam plavsc. ccx~nc~c, mcul ~r stax V.boclrn . ;
uJ i~caple oI nIl law'u uul untkridlUo ~+naWwilt whn sre sutrutg lut a ixua ~nukl. Nhni l itser H~in tilU7uG{ Iu trnted wlth natu~al nlont tes~rl yd{,
~u pln d~1t grca~ rut~r.~t~ prnect whkh shoulJ lx m¢ppild pcrtcxtually ui uwinsaln fXarty. • .
~
1au lttisie Mia muy kx pun:luwd ca Imnd-aattnl4,aily, dfaplaymg ilr Lrguagcs tlwa me GQiuv.sx, diry tnvy lre •wtAr.hn1 wlih u nunwuun of ttucr
i.:cpnlt~t ul ta Your ottW►i:ntk>a EYh f'rscc Etik shLwfd bc dcdlaved Na crx,r~or ilmc rau ccxnts nl tuuxl-oi'('Iluf sp°' waluuK A 4nti Lsuu uI varntsh
:mnmtmnafle a sprrlal atasiun (sucb m tht routuiuigof your ncgatilnulm ur ihe aruwd aajr he'SqAkd crery two a tlvee years A naaLka It,oce
l,' V-ckslFqtmtd lntunatlnpsl Dap d itur) Itx pcnyr.u otkird w rr,ur Ikxx Ebk ckdmw+i ~ 14k mry ata) Lc pgiatnl glix+i wlllk. u511tg a mYwnum ul
,Al hrlp w y.-Uvate che woclJwkJe cktwmi nC prayen 4x poct four crnes uf lilah qu.llip I»diatrYd ruutar hms a16yL1 vduLe
cnamd fn1nt, whlch widl tzu Shc yan _
:loh biaWcc c6n:aim rrsnuiru nl-suut itoa iblcs 4H yRUr Rlucncr. Nt lsopc tFun ynur
~
I ,~iXutilrxtluo wIII IHLtY77[ a (1SIt OI t1L7 I76(7IJi11g #loInI 1L:IwufM UI Cn]CTf}Ilg (1ciLc CUIG ki,6- Po00 INoHYp hkr.!¢ ptrque:1 cmi kM modc o( vxmm muends liuful4ig ~
ti<<, hy Jaininlg ilIc A,-icc 3l,Ir P:oJeL:t PIo4isna Plritlgiai'~ PlnstiL or waod TFLe FkxWm ldayuo are 316
hWr ltsue PrcwU ui Lwt6t (Vlcm? dkk with bLKk ktvjlnQ, cm n whitt hurSgvund
iurlcr ilx clnr p1x{uc. wldi cight wratl tu,ks i.u• wt1+.
:}k Wtxld itacc Prnyu 54xiu) KUodrn ['t 1b3rs oiar olvi imve won.kn pbklua, ustidly
www.wtuldQ¢u[z.cvg wltlt wlgsr kiutliiq. Slm(k Itxa R46 cao havc tlic tmsw
rnlual na Snmc .rry IxnulliW Irncr I1iics lta.p tbe lrmyu _
cnrNvJ dun:Uy liuu thc woad
r.
pb+vinwp a l[ }vu Iivt 1n a coutury that hu a itace it,k makrr, wctti as
~ . • • • • , . ~ Sw►utriand, Gtruwi oi C}il6e.
~J
Pom Poin
itacc lhks cvr:ying i.K li:mr. ncc: 1c-•: nirJ in ;:u:in• .rimtectenw( Ille Unlta. 5~at+a. li~~• 9 Y~
!3.p1TiUuau: Alld klMllltlYUli iu Jl[UJ::uI[ U L W1iuC klI lt"JCC ZIUllllJ L'Y wiAI.:, 1[idfix4 wL'1 r,roLwNy wudt u2 puutwnt }awr Rac Pnk Ilam du uwr, ulxiuccr, s dxY am nnt mpxnsire. 1Wr F1YC Rdc nta4a
Auucwl4m d South f9e MIm Nakrr ya5f1N, JoMurlu M1rkun.d of 1■ le~ Simr d Somw. Apu may nii tnlr the plaqucc I( rixu esafi ri)w cilivm pode lf y%su Ure
C. . . M d Iidpp.R1-+ Sedn 1.tt4, IiMnoo1 rrnwww VAaA+ols;ax DC tn ufinct w1u:c dtlpjdng wotild bt cnstlr cw If pu hare •
yrrwGvxl MutW Lrmgy hMmY IAEN, Visorno Arwls" d tin Aap,bic of lNlwdia mjIGU[f wllu ►i iitWatnl lu c1u1t1A tht »rq{i, rou mn ItY►t tClhu
nr.~raol Nta.Nn►y F+ud Swt %U"Go 0. n.,r..i uf die r.wirr. u4 d. Fluipphr ynia Lwm ikxe riLte rnautucecJ locnlly '_ororwncii itUS Is on ~
uum:.,uoeul Ch{jnnlndimi ol U. (mza~Au+nln JOWJ, 14a, hailW.r d dN U,oIwJ Fiw.oft G«wrol Auptivibh. N.w 11si n.-rl;cru wuy ui 4in.lkr lI ls. , i,:uieeuuu y Ui tlu iii iiJrc i
,"„g,a,st ti.d. Sews, C.als+ 5oud, Mlm MACtr,tlun IQ k,quwWl Gwuwonon S:"q.
t:u.,nd AnnmWy af IIM Rqmttc cF PJoe#m ~wwr"l•
_-.i.. ~I ripe. ea~.w~u~r ~a ww~ou rph. K)F~u~ej, uiJpJ Numm t,tamwm+. xannea mJ Cwt,id a .e
G~n~w O.paia~.n t1Y`~SCLI; hLw Yuri
Un~rd N~a s~ww~r hVwnw. ►ur~ry. ww •rw► ~I~~u mg! ~to
~~n:~rMw~ br 5~,irty maf Cm~ation Iw Lrvp+ (05CU.
totl Urrl Nsqrr w0Cr.nlw~.. iQ 1~... IWJ~~I: -
anm►l~y A~mUn 9.d~w1 Pwo. Piir Iwrm. U:.A TIe 1Mrlc4 hwopnrr• tlr WuLl M1oc. ►my- '
~~~;~+enlwn lor Saurlty mu1 C.aopaiatm im F.rum 1DXQ G fWQ 7 :nxw ' T
5rmtuiw6 VM1mnnu Umm+l Ndwr OdIw ut Nuhuw {UNGPQ Maple C,N. A4 496L/ sond.ilw Sn& 7, I f IIaN ~Iw+u OuucN Wdg
U,gmumRwi aF Mnuican 51uMs tOASI, Wuminpkry DC UMMI I*ft+n~ Nmw Yv1 lxiA lIA7J Nwdch 11S luknwcclw
'CQ-0OyJ
~ i,y.~,mtlu. J!+ hmoYwm Ewwltnp CowMm Qc~'EC;. Y:u~ Bui~ Gn~q1, MhiJd'qhia OC im! 13 I_U4 JSN Gtmu~Y c~~ 101r
v..M W1.1! I+nIA Olpooanron 1%1101. O.niw. Fua 731-3:144S2.3 bl: Av 159; 425ti7ooe
FunPr~:Rc Ylantt Fonm. fwno VNxUTridm QyamWla IW'l~. dw~u . ~0 {OV~6U8IPlU h" O t~~ ,
13132390919 w'wKV~~P`~'I.coo JaywnYMa,~t}rm.~k
Kar 1mH Pcg- Oul.d,ny w14u6wwldporticpllinry
Ita c•4r.m o[ aU fatths Itavc Irw arra'vui m Ilckc kble dal4wilone.l[wlu.l4tig tlx XlV llmlol Laucw. Mc;tlrct M111 SIMAIAgnM ti. v+4.u Mew►rq.r sm.,r ~ .~:i ~
Trma. Pitsidtnt Jlmwy Cuttt. O~aic C~prn mwJ kihn DtmeG as well ~ mry~~, duhs uui Cdt! Savuis it~mu, s.µl~.do c ~man s~du~ eoh ~,c. ~i. Pro~
ilxre sr ilcax Hacs an ihe Aiknby 6ra* tzelwecu knrl mxi,}nc~a+►: ia thr Nacr tosic1c whae W ftna RoWnpo d. Iuq.:vra5 A.Uduk aumGio ln..wr *00 mM
~aw~ na~s1 WN
i~ Nm~ic~~c au winser aly„ii" i,~ ~d ~ air; m the Wu M:~scw~~ Ls Vxt :~tun: at R~lxn ~l ~ 0G2 acr s~„ Uwwl tingtium 1ft1w..m ls1and m Soush ASnra. wiicrr Nclenn MWxkk ww ImpsttwHicd: ;st tlse Pytan*}: u CI Gini Ui L'gy(u: im dk ;.t ISQ 71774 4m Lt u 11381nAAU7 t.L U41241be7341 slee d iht boExa+n oI Joun at 9alwiyflefnnd-ehejunJm: aid st xhoe:a, ch:uciz-- syiwgcigun, Iar. ar (t 31I ntoU I Wa6talip-cepte-LIMu -
m~r.c},i-.r url tr:npA, urrn►s :.'r Udtcd tii:iR: iiiut woucw: tl'ic wn:L! ~'.~+Lni~.mm dkv.i+nOv.o+idrsouwp - "I-LiceY-lim, p'Y
wr. tpir1sN- u+y M.ayi"r G,.csll
Peace Pole Maker5 CSA(K - I'roduct, r'aue tot ~
Peace Pole Makers USAs-
ADout Us • Tesoffialai t3allery • Produrta • Order Farm • Relded 81Des • Corttsct
S ~ - ~ t~ (r ~ , • r , , a r
• . ~ ♦ T { ~ ~ ' ••w
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ► ' ,S , ~ .
~ • ~
r ~
Z y.'~ ~
' . 1.~_~ ~ ~ ~ •
• ~ ~ ~
. , ~i► ~ , i ; 4T ~ ,
3
'f• p ~ ~ -
~ • ~ ' ~
- , • j ~ ~
: _ 4_ ~ + ~ ~ r ~ _
Peace Pole Up Hex. Clear Oct. Sandblasted
Mailboxes North Orig White
[ ~.--fick Here for r.)~.
LkscrFption of Peace Pole Flnisn ~ s
Natural Piant Resin Oil gives our peace poies a ueauufui wami-
looking and durable finish as weil as being environmentally safe. 'i
product penetrates the wood's surface to strengthen and seal agair
moisture-staining and weathering. If desired, the finish may be eas;
maintained and enhanced with a periodic treatment of oil-resin,
otherwise the finish should weather beautifulty. There are now three
shades available, 'Clear', 'Up North', and '4riginai'.
Gloss White peace poles have a minimum of four ooats hand-applied
high quality industrial eacterior gloss alkyd white enamel paint. Weather
durability is excellent (3 to 8 years) depending on environmental
conditions before pa+nting is necessary.
httjl-',"«;~W E1(:3k:rj)01ts c0111,"prOLIuct: asp 7;2:1;200r,,
Peacc Polc Makers USAS - Products Page 2 of 3
(Peace Pole finishes from left to right: Gloss Black, Gloss White, Clear,
Up North, and Original)
Message Plaques and 8tards
Message plaques for peace poles are made of Plexiglas. The
Plexiglas plaques are 3/16" thick and are beveled on all edges. ThP
black lettering and white background on the underside of the ctar
ptaque is well protected from weather and scratching. Four-sided poles
may have four or eight message plaques. Hexagon poles may have six
or twelve message plaques.
Peace Poles stand approximately eight feet tall and are either four or
six sided. We reccomend planting them about 12 to 16 inches into the
ground. Planting directions will be included. A sturdy steel peace pole
stand is available for indoor display.
A Word About lhwe Uae d Our Woocf
We at Peace Pole Makers are c,oncerned abaut the health and care
of our environment, In researching viable materials for peace pofe
making, we found wood to be a renewable resource which would be
least harmful to the environment. Our choice of material is the western
red cedar which has a natural resistance to decay and insect attack. It
is also unlikely to warp, split, crack, cup or check with age or exposure
to the weather. We urge you to care for your peace pole appropriately.
If is our hope and trust that the peace poles we distribute will be
respected and cared for, that their purpose in promoting the message,
May Peace Prevail on Earth, will be worthy of their use of a precious
resource. P{ease feel free to oontact us if you have any further
questions.
More Products: (Click an ImeQe to view tha roladed Ptoducts)
i
e° - . a"m
1 ll=== A~r
• u ~ .
- %
~0.~=
d iv
s _ ,
: , -
IITt(1 11"w%1ti (}e:icC'pl)~C:~ ll?111:~!ii~llCij i3`;p
?cace Pulc :`Takirs tiSA~k1 - i'rodi.cis
:'I -,42:4
- cifice. t' J' , J24.e5: i
to:: :23 t ' 534-45:3
copy►qtA 0 2oa, P..c. rol. wRe►s us"
~atTp fi~4wtiv.jx;dc.ipc~le; c.fnir'prc>ciu4L, asp 7/224!2t;(16
~Sai• Pea" Prev;:il on Earfli P:~~~ 1 ~f 3
,
:ace PoiES are hand crafted monumEn#s worid over as an international symbol _
Neace. Their purpose is to spreaa the mE~ -
~~~ac~ Po1e Eve~,ts MAY PEACE PREVAIL ON EARTH, and act -
~,~ch;vE constant reminder far us to visualize and pray fc eace Meda►s *orld peace. Peace Poles acc as a focal point fc
-weat Lodges
'rumming OrcEe,-
` ~out Us
:Iobal Friends : ~;ponsorship
-lake A Donation
1 ~ - - - , - • ~ _ it.-. ~
(x
i ' • ' = ti.~!'' f
. . • L1. _
Vl
' - - -
- _ _ ~ _ • M • ~1 •
..eHv►es.~~
~
t~Lace Foie Nrv;ecc
The World Peace Prayer Society, a non-prc:
.on-denominational organization founded in 1 c
)y M a s a h i s a G o i. T h e p r o j e c t w a s l a u n c h 2 d w i t
-ledicaiion to uplift humankind toward harmci ,
_ -ether chan conflict. War bagins with thoughts
var... peace begins ~ w~th thoughts af peace. 7-
. ~
:1eace Pole reminds us to keep peace e~~~= present in our thoughts. To date, friends a rby sEndir;g a tax supporters have dedicated over 1$0,000 poles -
uctibiE danation 180 countries around ihe world. Peace Po1es,
:'EasA visit o-ir
ra donation page well as stickers carrying the neaca mess,r
,~►ivkirg cr. ±re bp- sQOfited on everv contir:~
h:-p !A«i-w peacepoles.oc-P,/polcs html 7L24/2006
JS11 vl, • ,
- i ,
~ ' .
~c¢~ - " - ; . •
i ~ • ' ~ - _ _ t-,
~ s ~
lancs 1'eaCe PQies7
ic~d
V~fho p 1~ ~u are insP
weac~ F Ole. y message ,r,,,.. °i
2r~ct a ~~m~~P th~ ~~r
o P as
Anyon~ ~C •~,O t ote
by tne ~dea ~n~ ~edIcate a~'eac frien~Yds pof as a
peace. You ca~ ,n;►th a 9C°~p af articular
indivi~►ua,. ~ ,~Q~ fam►ly, need not be1On9 i tQ 8have been
unIty. hey ~rore►
comm c S~haQ1 of thou9n'~ w~IKS of Iife . t thE
fa~th OtrI ct~d rer2mony ~
itts ~.a
pcesente~ as 9 res+~entS. In ~ Peace Po~e tc
Sc~pat ~h~Id(En to P t~)ted a foste
eo Nations me~+b v~ pespo
e,press ns~b+ito
Un~t coilect~
peace-
r'i ~ ~ + - 1 `:r~ ` ~ ~ ~~1 ♦ t
s+'
~
i
r . p~~~t Peace poles
When to athecingS, cl
,Veddings, '`~°O~s are but a fe`~1
Holiciays. festiva~,r~nda.ys and Po1es
e,~ents, ~ peOple PEant pe~ ta Cel
accasions whe eX~u~e : nowe"
neVei need an
May Peace I'revail on Earth Pagc 3 of 3
. ~~oCc. Y~1uf ~i i("i~ E:c:..E
e peace network.
J'•` i
! 1
1(.~ plant Peace Poles
--'eace Poles have been planted in farests, cities,
~,ilages, squares, hospitals, caty halis,
:;orporations, schools, churches and temples,
-astaurants, private yards, offices and even living
.ooms. Choosing a prominent place to piant your
=eace Pole is a special part of the process. One
_~~rson chose to rnake his Peace Pofe mobile and
:aveled with it to the Nevada Nucfear Test Site
::nd also the California State Capitol.
I reace Poles ( Peace Pole Events Archive I
eace Medais I Sweat Lodges I Drumming Circles ~
~jut Us ~ Global Art & ProduCts I Globai Friends ~
►,,lovn i-1, jii,n I iCr*, Ct 1_Ic.
rig:~ lJ
nAl-1 l=
http /i~~rivw.peacepolcs ~~i-glpolcs htilil 7r24r2006
Expense Statement for the Peace Pole
POLE $800
SHIPPING $75
DEDICATION PLATE S25
BRA1L PLATE $12
CONTRACTOR p0 '
ESTIMATED TOTAL S962
' wait!ng on exact cost intormation from contractor
I
~
Peace Pole Project
Aimee Goo d and Amanda Edens
Gir Scout ~roop 92
a . ~ s e Peace Pole?
, a
A hand-crafted
. ~
monument that
x.~ .
disp ays the message
~ 4P
a n d May
prayer
Peace Prevail on
Earth on each of its
. ~
four or six sides,
usua y in different
J'
anguages.
~
~
r
..~rW
I
Why we chose this project?
• For our Gir Scout Go d Award
• We fee that peace among nations is a
strong issue in today's societ
y
• Brings the different ethnic groups of the
city together
The Peace Pole
• A 6-sided, a-natura cedar, sandb asted
po e.
• Eng ish, Spanish, Russian, ~atin/Arabic,
Native American, Sign ~anguage
• About 8 feet ta
.0. , ~ ~I .~I ~ _ . ~'w'~, ♦
,~6➢t" ,
~
~ ~ • ,
r
OG pfA
K
~
ST p`~~'" . ~e'~re~'tt4~
d~d
S9o4cane
P
~ .
~ v • ; _
, , . -
I . ' w.~`~ • .
~ _ -
a" ,,i, - i ! yj. ;,t4,
~ + r ,t+ ~ ' S
.
x _
~
, /
~ T
~ -
-
r a , . ' ~~b
~ r ~ r ~ ' . . . , ~-r°
. . ~ • : S, . -~~,y
\ ' • ~ ` .
, ~ Y+~ . _ +r ✓ ; t.. . •i . . .
. ~ti; ti w,. _ ~ •
~ 4s~ .tJ« ...~.f.~ J ti,^ Vv
,w~ s 1 1 _
t ~ - ! ~~4~ ' ~ ^s f_• p.~
` ~ a ✓y '_~f'
~ ~ ~
Wtl,
4 Y -dw ,
.
. ' . . ' ~4+.
• ~ ' R "T
, 1. , . ~
~
,.►~~t ~ ~ r^
gs',
~ _`l'•,1~r _ - ~ ~,p. . ~
y
• s.~ ~I~1 ~
~^,~r~~`' ~,•,3 ; ~ •.i`,
~ + `t'• , •
~ ~ ~
, ~~f 'U ~ Y~ ♦ ~ ~
y ~
Possible Locations for the
~
Peace Pole
. _ ,
r
~
` V .
. S a. .t`~
~
.
e , _ . ' ,
. . ~ . ~ .~..-,-~f I v- _in, ~ 4 I/A. ~ ~ ~ ~ '
OL ~
! i ~ ~ • , i
. . - -
a . A
~ . ~ _ ~.c- ` •
~iM` r Y,~k' 'r ~ • Ac~
w . ~„^;,a'. •l-_ y~~i ~ ~ .1
~ ~ j
s~ . • _ ~ -~M.
~ ' • . i~ < pr .
_ • ' - ~'~~„n+~ , r.-
* , ~ 1 F r " ' - • , , . •~~s#i'~~s
!"T,y~~} •f~a _ ~Vay~ M .~►~t,r sd n~ .t~ ~ j~ r
"G'M1'♦ . ' . - • 1 .•wyu ~k~~~ ,'r , I,~~~~ y.tN '
~ . +~~~~~1{~~, f ~ : ~w'.'_~. J,~~~+ r
y ~ t~`y ~f~~} ~ , f,,•v Y~ ~i, s+' ` - , ~ e ~A~ K* M~'' =~~y ~
, • . ' ~ #1+1 - ';~c at
. - , '~L~ ~I_. 0 ~'~~{~y• ~ . . l , . r y a. ( H - , '
• . ~ ' ~ -~-e:- i° ~ .r.~~.~~~?1~',7s'+CI~,~ . • , p , ~ ~ ~ .,Y~.-,~`:+ ' j
. , ~ ~ ~ - . ~ ~ . 1 < 1' 7~~t~i •~~it~ ~ ` r~
. ? _ ~ ~ 1 . • ~ . f. 'e Wi /
1~ (w~ . ,YY ♦ . ~ '~Y i' ~ i
. • t • r ~ 4 Z . :
~ ~ r f r
, ' • ~ ~ ~ ' 11t ~ a 40~~$
,
"k .l
~f'f ~ -r ~
ij
I • ~i b~r t
. i~ ♦
_ . . _ r ~ L.~''_ °{a~Ti.Y.. , ~~al_ ~ ~ ~ . e y ~ ~ ^ Y
~1
r'~~~ ~y~~ .;+~'e ` M 1T ~.w
1 f ~ ~ti
,
. f ;
~4w f~j~ , tr~''
,
~ - - ~ ~ 'A f
~Y jt'~w ' r ~y~ 1• * ~
!
V
. f yl .
~
~i
;p * _
7
" . .
. et., ~
'
.`#~llR ' +~"~!a
' ..{ri :~'.~.`'~`a.~ a,~ l~• r ' ~ .
• - ' - r t'f.i~~. ~ . . `r .~~'f_. i 4 ~
1' Y..'s.- ~ r•' r;,`~~ ~i~:t,
• ` i'
w ~ ~ 'I ' ~~~i S~~E1°~[; . . ~is I~ ~ • ~ ~
~i.: f . ti 1' ! _ , L_ a ^ f l~ ►,'E I~. , . ~•y ~>.i, ^
.
w.
r~ -
. , ,
h • ~ ~
~ ~ ..J
Y • , 7F
` ~ •
r
t ~ ' c
w
~ t
. . . - ' .
-I-OF'
1►t
, - " -
_
. ' Ji.
• .
} • i1_.. • ~ ~ , ~ . . 1 ' I
~ - ~ . _ - _ _ - ~ >
~
I
~1, - -
' ' • ' " ~
~ ~,y '~r.'~" fl ' " ~ d -
* , s. $ ` a . .
.~PT
i
~ ~ ~ 4. ~ ~ ~ - " ~~Q ~
~4, _ ~ ~ u' 'lE" ~ { ' j ~ y =1v i _ ►
~
r LL ~
3",^$~-~ ' - - ~ Y* ; ~~f'p~~ - u t'~ _ ' •
- - , ~ _
° - '
~.T
~
~ } . . . . . _ . _
~
. ~ . . Y. _ _ _ _ - , . l . ~ _ -
~ _ . ' .u1~ . r° , ~~l` $_T ~ ; . q & 1 ' . - - ♦ a~~'~'~,
~ ~ - . . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ i. ~ P ~ ~ A,k .
I . T
~
~ ~J . tr ~ r ~u - • . ~ . . . _ , ' .
•
f : - , _ x._r~,. ♦r-,~ ~ KF 1 i~ ~ F.~C =`5t.s' . : . - ` ~ - a , P
. ~1 ~T ' Y . ' ~ & ~~~.s ~ " . _ -
_ - p, d~ ti 'i ,4~ 1 .~w~ a~`~« " S. '~{F'~a - ~r ~ - ` ~ . ! + • . - `
-~:syy n yM; - i . ,;J' /9 i.e,~-~; + i '~t~,'~++, ~ - - i~ s~;'~ w 4 yT;t` - " * ' . + ~ , Y F~ ~
~ )
~ „ ~ r. ir ~fl, u~ _ y T • Y - - , ~
t
t AN
1.'~ .t' ~ ~'~f ' •r~~~
.
t~ . r ~ ' #4t ~t f y~ ~ ~ t~
a ~ ~r. ~ ..i•r
. 1
- S,1! ~ ~ • + • ~ ~ ♦ x~ _
~
a
. ~
~ . - . - - ,ft" i ; ~ ~
~
• ~',~c' ~ - ~ , a, . ' ~ , - ~ ~ ` ,
~ i' - ~ y ~ .s ~q
_ . ~
~ °j~{ ~ •4~ ~ ` ~ ~ 1
f t ~ ~ , vr J ~ ~ t ~ I ~ 1 • t ~
q e Y ~ , _ ! ' . ♦
rr~ ~_s;~ ~ 'r •
- . ~1 ti~: y~e. ~ . •,4ry'~ ~ ` .
. i ~ ~ ~T ~~i~' R. M ♦ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~u
~ • 4~~ ~ _ 1 '1 r ~.r" l~
;
J
ll~~~,,~s;,'~ t~*~~:•
L~ . . ` ~ 3 . I
. . ~ '4
, , . . ~ .
~ s E~6
~ ~
~ . .
` .
:
~
. ~ _
. ~
,
,
, , ► -~r,.,
, ` ~
~
, r
~
► ~ ' -
. 4 . ~
~ ' K
'Y~~.~~. ~ : ~ ~ • ~1~
4:
_ i~' ' +s ~Arl~
i •t t ;
• w~ 11 _ ~I M . ~ ~'l~
` 1 ~ , `4 n ' ~
{ •.~jn.r+ \ _ p ~•i'
•~Y ' • .ry „ ~ ~ ` ~y. k .
. ' ~ i
Y• Y
~'r, '~fl , ' . °lf
~•Js'~,;?' , ~i } ;:~o h ` {
~~!r 4 ~ + + ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~l ~Y~ d ~.y ,}~i ~1~•- ~~+~~r ~ ,t ~ t•
A
P' : • ~
1,.k~. . ~f~ ~
t w t ~ ti `~~lt`7 34k
'
' .~`L'~`~.~4•~, i r rr
t.` t` .~~.i .^I,fyYj~~ s 1: ~ ~ ~ .t~ T~YT, {S";. ~i ,~•~•~i, ~ ~ • R
.,Ik. i{►.` ~ ~ y ~ t (
~1 'r?~ . • .~►}~1t 'a. 1 r~~
~ ~.j.. ~ , 1~~• ~ . • ,~,j,. f . i .
f ~ : ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ; ~ M'~rr . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i .
ik
rc ~ ~ .fi ~ v,l~~'~~•,~:. L 1~it'..~~~~1~ .~'.A-' • ~ . Z t~11~ A
~ r 'S~! ~ ~ ' : ~ ~t ~ ~t ~ ~ ~ •r
, t~, ' L.a~`~ f' ;(t~'~ ~ {~~,ti~~•'~~ r
~ . . ' f'1'~ jy Y ~ '4►' ~ 4 ' , `'~",`?i~;~►~ •
. ' .l:•+x~,. ~1.t f~'► ~.7~.~' . ,.'I: +yytiT ~
App,
' - . t•~~/ - 7ST `
. .r`~ ~ ' ~ ~ t~ ~ _ ♦ 'r ,r•. r , , ~ , AA
, A4. f7~
_ r `'yr~ j; ' ` ' ~ ~ •
YJr • ~ ` ~A.~ ; ~ ~ • f
M~' 4 • ~ ~*~r ,
4I r
~ ~y. ^'~'f~~ . ~ ,r,t:~ • ~ . # .~f .
ry t ~i ~.r- - "'i.~~i~^~, ~j , :'..t lu", ' .M•~f '
~ '•v ~ , ('st+ 'y' , * ~ f ? . ~.a. ` . ~ . ~ ~y1. !'s'~'. 'o
~ , y ` } w ` . ~ • , j . , 'r~ ' ,y;~
, . - y ,~r,~..
. . , ~ ' ' r, db..• .y~ .r .
~~t",~ S .~'S".
t ~ r ~'~i•'` ` ` ~ 4"~~t~ Y ' ~ ~jw
. . - * ~
• ~ T• ' >
.
, - ~
. y ~ •ae' r ~
y4 . s^ ~+3 • ' .
> ~
w - -.l± , - _ _ . ^ . r i ' , ~ . . , ' ~ n~
1 _ - d.= ♦ Y*t
. - -'~-"R-s~~r5~--. ► r- l,,
'•'~'~.1~_ ~ ,~y~~ , M ~al-"~~ N i ~ ` . 4 . , . ! ~ 4 ~ ~ ~
y.-
;r - z , -
►~-4P
i~
~ R ~ ~ a . • k ' , .
Lf' ' . ~,r. •~iJ t~,
► `^aF
/ ~ ,
~Y'~ ~ i f ~ ''~a~t,~ j,
t • ~
.R ' ~rt ~ !
J A
/ ~ ~ ~ ' y , w'~,~1♦n
€ ~ • ' : ? ~ . r ~1' .
~ ~~t f
. t ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ,+A'~~ ~+r~ ~ ,~::~t;~ -:~~'t ~
, ; ; ► • '
f.
, ~
. !
, t . . "
k~. ~r~~ ` • ~
' - ' ~f 'T
. < •
. ► !
, ' . ~'i~ ' '~t
~ ti_•$h~_ ~n,. ; ' . 41
~t0,rcc~i i 1 ,~~t
yy f 1 - 1' r
~ - ~ .
~ ~
~ , .
ar , ~ ir' • ~
,
~
_...~r '7
s,
~
- ~ -
...~i~ ~'i~ ~
_ - - ' '.Va . , , j~h, . " R'~ ~ ~
` "{~~~~r%.J,;"~-" ~
` . ~ . T't~r! ~
t ~ r~, l r r~~• T` ti~{ i.
. _ ,
. • , f si ~ i'_Hi ~'i~ ~ .
i t
• , S.~ ` ~~~w 'j ~ .
• ~K : , ~
.•us ~ ~ ~ , f ~ ~ r, •
1 ~ , . • ;+'f` x ~ • .'`-y ~ r~ ~ <
: ~
~ ~ ~ ~~t~~ -
, . F~-' ~~j'tp..:~ F'.~' yY.
. ~ ~ i,. ~ F .
- ~ i. ~ ,K_, . r r ~
1 ~ c ' • . ~ 4 ~ j~ l
k f~t ~ - _ : ~ _ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ r''~ . ~
, o ~ ~ ► , , . ~ ~
~ jC .t''~+ ir r}•
; '.r , ~ } ~ : y. , ` ` ~
~ ~j+~~yl ~1~~~~'R`", ~'~ii
~ ~
, {r , , ~;~.,r`~='i;~,,~y~~
R' ' . . `iC' ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~tt-~~~4~yy~q,.s •'.f , y ~'~r~'' .
I +r ~ r + T 's~ ~T ~
~ ~ `~,~K~;,•• 1 ~ a ~ - 4~ '
' ~ ~ .t ~t.~r f•~~ 'i - rr~ _
r ` ' . • . ~~r , • ~S• 1' • } ~ '~Y._ .y ~
r" ''f j_~ ~~~~.~t , ` " ~•~f ~
• ~ ti• ' ~ ~ ~ ,r.;-',
. - r .
s`a~' ~ ~ i #'ar~ !I ~ '
♦ ..~a,~ ~4~(l .
s
. .
.f..•r~"■'r wF . .A~
f ~ , 1 ~ ~ c~
1 t 1' ' ~ ~ ~ • ' ~ ' ~ , ~ ~'c
~
~ ~ ~ ~
.F ~
~ t •
~ , ~ ! i ~~t - x ~ •
I, ; , ~ • ~
. "a, A a ~ .1~, ~ ~
~ ,j
w •5~. ` Z'.'~~.,~ t~ ~
`
• , ~
~ ~ . { •
How much will this cost?
•'he cost wi be rou h$1000-inc udin
g y g
the po e, stand, and shipping
• ~oca business sponsorships
• Businesses wi be recognized by a p aque
~rc*
~
. . - ` ~ tr~~~#~~~.~-'t ~~r'S ~>~,~.~r~t~`
'~P~ro~qr~ "~;x` ~{,,:;r~• _.4..~ ~ ~ , 0:
n
f ` ~ ~ d C •
=♦r., ~,pl
~ 77' ~ h k ~ ~ ta ~ . ~ ~*~I ~ ~ . . s ~ 1 ~ rrp~+
.
- •
, • = ..~►=~''4;,~~..
p . , ~ . • a . ~ ,r. _ ~ r~"" ~ - , ~
4 t+.-,
. 4 :
~
~s A ' ' • . ' ~
~
. s . . J . ~ ~ .
, . . • . . _ d ~ A,.
r ' ~ ~f* er'~
~„~f r. `4~+• .J€ ~+'~n ry# - ' ~
r,~~, x~' ~ i~ r~~~r _p b~ '
~ ' -
~r ~'Y'~d ~d Y,~ 4 ~a.. . `~+~`i~` - ° ~
l ° ~r
~ ~ ~ i , ..,t,~. ' .':y~, ~ 1„~~A . ~ _
•
R'~~:~{'~ q,~J'.r` a ~ ' ~ - - ~ s.,` '~+9 I ~ .,.,~y . . ~ i • ~a ~ +1 _ - , .
~ t
.
~nfli~'~ t~v.~j.f~~ * . ~ . ~ . a'°~,..♦. , ~ 'SA # " _-n. w~. f~, ~ " q~. ' r ~r~~'~7'qy'?hJ. ~ ~e y~* ' ~ 16,y~~'k
.
y,'/ p J~. ' R ~~,M~+I~A' . ~ ' ~ t`~A ~ ~.l ~l ~ Y.~~• ~ a~ ~
x . .
:~jM,Y ~i6 ~ ~ . : , f `~t~~r .,Fl~~,. ~ , ^ p,• da, ~'Y
r;.. . , r" " . " ~ .'f 1~, y►~„ • . ~~w ~ .
~ ~ f . t p• 4 ~ . c„ ^ ~ . . ~ y ~ ~
. . ~ ~ . .
° ~
.
_
`
s„~.a'
,
.
. . Y ✓~.~wa~ I 1 ~ ~ ~t `~y- , ~ w ~4 Po ~ •i J
~ . . ~ , ~ _ . d ~A ' k -~~r • t~~ ,
«
.
. +
.
' f F a ` ` ~ L
, ; '6~' ~ .i5.~~ . . r'
„
CITY OF SPOKAiVE VALLEY
~
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business X new business public hearing
information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Estimated 2006 and 2007 revenues and expenditures
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: No formal council action has been taken on the 2007
budget. A proposed budget has been prepared and is being reviewed by the City Manager.
The City Manager is expected to present his preliminary budget to the council on August 22.
Three public hearings are planned to gather input from citizens
BACKGROUND: Each year staff prepares estimates of the proposed revenues and
expenditures for the coming year. These estimates are presented to the City Council (August
15) and then to the public at a public hearing (August 22).
~ State budget law requires we make our projections known and conduct a public hearing to
consider input from the public.
Special mention is required of the property tax levy. The comparison below reflects the 2005,
2006 and estimated 2007 property tax levies. The tax rate is expected to remain at
$1.60lthousand dollars of assessed value as anticipated in state law.
2005 2006 2007
Prop. tax levy $9,545,050 $8,056,000 $9,100,000
Est. increase 8 new construction in $ . 200,000
7otal $9,545,050 $8,056,000 $9,300,000
These 2007 estimates reflect a decrease in the dollars levied of $245,000 (-3%) from 2005 and
an increase over 2006 of 1,244,000 (15%).
2007 property taxes have been estimated near the maximum allowed by state law. As the 2007
budget is finalized, reductions may occur in the levy.
The City's actual 2007 levy may be more or less than shown.
Other significant changes in General Fund revenues include an estimated increase in sales tax
receipts of $886,000 and an estimated decrease in service fees (planning and building receipts)
of $85,000. -
OPTIONS: State law requires a hearing on 2007 estimated revenues and expenditures. The
hearing could be postponed a few weeks if council so desired.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff recommends council conduct a hearing on the
2007 proposed revenues and expenditures on August 22. No other action is needed at this
time.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This information will be incorporated into the 2007 Ciry
Budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
~ City of S pokane Valley
Proposec# Budget - Draft
2007
2006 2007
2005 Arnended Proposed
Actuals Budget Budget
001 - General Fund
Genefal Fund Resources:
Beginning Fund Balanre $ 4,493,460 S 1,022,575 $ 5,050,000
PropertyTaxes 9,333,284 8,058,000 9,3G0,000
Property Ta xes - Delinquent 176,055 225,000 225,000
Sales Xax • 16,868,850 16,800,000 17,686,800
Gambling Tax 989,238 910,000 910,060
Franchise FeesIBusiness Pegis#ration 750,346 681,750 724,170
. S#ate Shared Revenues 1,149,685 9,121,000 1,121,000
Service Revenues 2,514,985 1,685,000 1 ,fi00,000
F ines and ForFeitures 1,229,557 1,250,000 1,250,040
Recreation Program Revenues 414,257 345,516 407,700
MiscellaneausJlnvestmenk fnteres# 259,654 233,800 250,000
Intetfund Transters 118,944 80,400 85,600
~ Total General Fund Resaurces ~ 39,298,314 $ 32,410,641 ~ 38,610,270
General Fund Expertditures
Legisl2tive Branch 234,609 304,267 . 242,393
Executive and Legislattve Support 365,414 470,105 535,721
Pubtic Safi~ty 76,096,633 17,173,541 18,256,400
Deputy C ity Manager 340,239 499,405 519,212
Finarice 433,930 516,895 782,652
Legal 209,218 263,750 344,933
Muman Resaurces 86,750 181,120 1E5,944
Public Works 844,010 980,192 1,142,887
Planning 844,939 7,170,848 999,967
Building 950,492 1,065,892 1,296.209
Library 2,176,178 - 20,000
Parks Admin $28,696 830,203 879,509
Recreatian 146,127 189,475 242,947
Aq4+44i4J 2LiJF64J9 L.T~,9G I 269,450
Seniar Center 77,735 72,269 75,301 CerrterPlace 208,738 457,798 498,326
General Govemrnent 7,481,501 7,930,000 5,135,000
Total C'aeneral Fund Expenditures 31,550.$15 32,410,541 31,496,853
.r
81712006 10:20 AM ,
2006 2007 2004 2005 Amended Proposcd
Actuals Actuals Budqet BudhCt
101 - Streei Fund Beginning Fund Baianco 5,050,885 3,397,697 3,903,0132 4,420,000
Street Fund Revenues
Propehy Taxes 203,203 39,818 - -
Motor Fud (Gas) Tax 1,5 .4,237 1,488,818 1,753,000 2,000,0dO
InteAund Interest 56,G94 12,308 - -
Irivczstmenflnicsrest - 84,811 50,000 100,000
InEeriund 7ransfers - 2,000,000 2,000,000 900,000
Insuranao Premiurrxs & Reeovcr6es - 6,033 •
Miseellaneaus Revcnue - - 35,80D -
Total Street Funcl Rcvenuc. $ 1.04,134 S 3,632,487 S 3,848,600 $ 3,000,000
Street Fund Ecpenditures
Salaries, 1Nages, & BeneflLs- 141,605 64,737 211,636 348,534
Supµl5es 5,044 6,523 16,950 16,950
Services 8 Chafges 531,737 533,099 9,210,680 1,176,080
In'ergtnremmen'al Paymctrsls 2,434,537 2,321,077 2,660,300 2,823,745
In`•erftmd TransEers 34,300 100,944 67,290 83,617
Capifaf Outlay • - - -
Total Street Fund Expenditures 3,147,223 3,032.381 4,1C,6,856 4,448.926
Street Fund Estimated Fund Batance S 3.307,897 $ 3,908,002 $ 3,588,746 5 2 87~160.74
2006 2007
2004 2005 Amended Proposed
Actiials Actuals Budqe4 Budqct ' •
102 - Arterial Street Fund Beginning Fund Balance 286,538 687,810 657,989 890,000 •
ArtertRt Street Fund Revenues
hM1Otor Fuel (Gas) Tax 538,978 314,756 - -
Imestment Interest 7,235 34,063 - 32,000
7ransler trom CDBG Fund - 134,941 - -
Yotal Arterial Stroot Rovenucs S 546,213 $ 483,759 6 - S 32,000
AAerfal5treet Fund ExpendlWres
CBpIfAIOUIIBy • 1,200 - -
Interfund Transier'. 134,341 322,480 568,655 912.000
Total Arterfal Street Fund Expenditures 134.941 323,680 568.655 912,00U
Arterial Street Esdmated Fund Bafanco $ 697,910 $ 857,689 S 289,234 $ -
8/]l2006 10:20 AM
1
~
2006 2007
2004 2005 Amendcd Pro,posed
AcWa1s Actuals Budqet BuBqct
103 - Trails 8 Paths Boginning Fund Balance - 8,492 15,658 18,000
Trails 8 Paths Revenues
Motor Fuel (Gas) Tau - StreEt Transfer 8,442 6,914 5,053 5,000
Investment Intares: - 252 - -
Total Trails 8 Poths Revenues 5 8,492 $ 7.168 S 5,053 S 5,900
Trails 8 Paths Expen4iWres
Capi.al UuUay - - 23,053 21,000
Tatal Trails & F'aths Expenditvros - - 23,053 21,000
Trails 8 Paths Estimatcd FunA Batance $ 8,492 S 15,.853 $ f2.3421 5 -
2006 2007
2004 2005 Amende+i Proposed
Actuals Actuals BuAqr.t 8udgct
105 - HotelRdatel BCgtnning Fund Balanco 221,827 136,494 252,271 250,000
HoteUMotel RovenuCS
HotellA4otel T8x 353,644 387,829 350.000 400,000
Invesirnerlt IntErCst 1,607 6.118 1,000 B.ODO
~ To.tal HoteUMOtCI Revenues $ 365,051 $ 393,947 S 351,000 S 408,00D
kotel/Motc1 Expcnditures
IntertundTnansfers - 28,i56 40,000 40,00D
Tburisrn f'rotfqtion 450,383 250,014 300,567 G98,000
Total HoteUAlotcl Expendlwres 450,333 278,170 400,867 658,000
HoieUMOtcI Estimated Fund Balance $ 136,494 S 252.271 S 202 6Ua S -
2406 2007
2004 2005 Amensled ProposeA
Attuflls Actuals Budqet eudqet
720 - CenterPlatie OperaUng Reserve Seg Funt1 Belance • - 308,291 315,000
CCnterPlace Operating Roserve RCVCnues
Irnestment In4CrC,t • 8,291 - 10,000
- -
Interfund TfanSler - 300,000
Total CCntCrPlacc Operating Roscrve Revenues b - $ 306,291 S - $ 10.000
Cente►Place Operating RC,Crve Expenditures
Reserve Ear CentarPlace OperAUons • - 300,001) 325,OD0
Total CenterPlece Operating RGSCrvc Expenditures - - 306,000 325,900
CentcrPlece Operating Resorvc Est(mated Fund BaEance $ - S 306.281 $ 6,281 S -
%
8J7f2008 10:20 AM
2006 2007 '
2004 2005 Amcndcd Proposcd '
Actuals Actuals Budqot Budact
121 - Service Level Stabilization Reserve Beg Fund Bafance - - 2,335,706 5,000,000
Service Level Stabilizatlon Rcscrvc Rcvenucs ,
InvesUnent Interest - 29,601 - 200,000
Intqlund'I'ransEer - 2.308.105 - -
Total Servico Lovel Stabilization Reserve Revenues $ - S 2.335,708 $ - $ 200,000
Service Lovcl Stabilization Rcscrvo Ezpendituros
RescrvC for Service I.evel Slabilc7ation - 1,000,000 5,200,004
ToWI Scrvico Levcl StaGilization Rcscrvo Exponditures - • 1,000,000 5,200,000
Service I.cwcl Stabiltaatfon Rcservc Es1. Fund Balanee S - S 2.335,706 S 1,335.706 5 -
2006 2007
2004 2005 Amended Propased
ACtusls Actuals Budget Budqot
122 - Wfnter Weather Rescrvc Beg Fund Balance • - 507,flG9 520,000
Winter Weather Reserve Revenues
Investment InQeres$ - 7,909 - 20,000
lait?rfund Transfer - 500,000 - -
Total Wlnter Weather Reserve Revenues S - 5 507,908 S - $ 20,000 • '
Winter WcathCr Rescrve Expanditures
C2cservo for Wirsler VJealher - - SOO,DDO 540,000
Total Winter Woathar Reserva Ezponditurc+s - - 500.000 540,000
Wintcr Woatner Rescrvc Esiimated Fund Batonco g_ - $ 507.909 $ 7.909 $ -
2005 2007
2004 2005 Amended Proposed
Artual:° Aetuals Budget Budqet '
204 • aebt Servtce Beglnning Fund Balance - - - -
Debt Service Revenuas
FaqIiUCS Distrid Payment 395,643 397,745 414,000 414,000
IntcrtvndTransfcrs 595.285 185.090 1186.000 186j.000
Total Debt Service Revenues $ 580,928 S 582.835 3 600,000 5 600,000
Dcbi Service Expenditures
DeGt Service Payments 580,928 562,835 600.000 600.000
Total Deb! Service Expenditurer 580.928 $82_835 600.000 600.000
Debt Service Estimated Fund Balanso S - S $ - $ -
8ll/2D06 10:20 Ah9
2006 2007
~ 2004 2005 Amended Proposed
Actuats Actuals Budnet BiiAqet
301 - Capital Projucts Beginning Fund Balaneo 632,547 1,569,488 2,286,583 3,000,000
Capital Projocls Rovenuas
REET 1-7axos 1,637,920 1.258,560 1,000,009 1,006,000
Investment lnteres9 14,656 65,157 20.000 126,090
Total Capital Projects Revenues $ 9,052,578 $ 1,321,716 S 1,020,000 S 1,720,000
Capital Projects Expendltures
Intergovemmental Services - 497,959
Capltal0utfay - - - -
tnterfund Trijrrsfers 115.639 132,545 1.210,000 4,120.000
Total Capital Projects 6cpenditures 115,639 624,504 1,210,000 4.120.000
Capital Projoets Estimated Fund Balaneo $ 7,569.486 $ 2.266,698 5 2.076.698 $ -
2006 2007 •
2004 2005 Amended Proposed
ILCtuals Actuals BUdpet Budqet
302-Spec Capital PrCjects 6eqfnnfng Fimd Balance 559,100 1,250,170 2,446,148 3,300,000
Spec Capital Projocfs Rovcnucs
REET 2- Tax(tS 972,120 5,234,350 1,000,000 1,DOD,tldD
InvQSEmentlntcrest 11,593 54.213 20,000 120,000
~ ToLaI Spce Capital Projeets Revenues $ 983,713 $ i,288,522 $ 1,620,000 5 1,120,0()D
Spee Capital ProjCCts ExpCnditurcs
CepltalOuUaY3 - - ' -
In;erfimd TrAnsfers 292.643 92,545 1,070,713 4,420,000
Total Spec Capital Projects Expenditures 292,643 92,545 1,070,713 4,420,000
SpeC Capftal projects EsUmateA FunA Balance $ 1.250,170 a 2.448.148 5 2.395,435 S -
81712006 10:20 AM
2006 2007 -
2004 2005 Amendcd Propostrd
Actuals Actuals Budqet BudqFrt ,
303 - Streoi Capttal Projects Beginning Fund Batance 30 1,821 5,014 -
Street Capital Projccfs Rcvcnues
Investmesit Interest 352 5,014 - -
Developer Camtribu4on 3,021 23,881 - -
ConVibut+ons - GranEs • 147,028 5,023,400 3,850,691
Interfund Trnsfer 1.514.314 825.448 2,362,443 3.289.152
Total Street Capital Projects Rcvcnucs 8 1,517,687 S 1,001,176 b B,385,8.3 $ 8,939,843
Street Gapltal Projects ExpanditurCs
Setvices & Charges - 241,321 6,073,170 -
Errgineering and ArdiiteCtural - 22.221 -
Salaries & Wages • f 3,3Q9 S,frUO
Employe=_ Benefits - 4.582 2,200
Interqovemmentaf Paym¢flts • • 206.154 49,744 -
CapltalOutlays 1.515.895 480.390 2,255,129 6,900.000
Total Street Capital Pro}ects Expenditures 1,515,895 997,977 6,365,343 8.900.000
Street Capital ProjcCts Estimated Fund Balante S 1,621 S 5,914 S 5,014 $ 39,843
2006 2407
2004 2005 Amended Proposed
AcWals Actuals Budget 13udqet
304 • G1lrabeau Projotfs BC,ryinning Fund Balance 6,876,825 3,783,205 449,488 425,000
Mirabcau Projects Revonucs
Ooneiions 2,880,670 67,747 - - Procc:eds fram L7 Debi - - - '
Insurance Recoveries 1,066 - - ~
OtMet Miscellaneous Reverwe • 38,168 -
Inveslmenllnterest 75,87.9 44,732 - 16.000
Total Mirabcau Projects Revenuas S 2,951,565 S 150,568 $ - $ 16,000
Mlrabeau Projcc~a Ezpenditures
Service3 & Charges - • - '
In;ertund Transfcr - - - -
Salaries & Vt'agcs - 54,175
Empsoyae Benefits, - 1.146
Gapitbl0utlity° 6.051.185 3.469.083 783.208 441,000
Total Minheau Projects Expenditures 6.051,185 3,484,404 783,205 441.000
lAlrabeau ProjotL, Efitima0ed Fund Balance S 3,783,205 S 449,488 S (333 717 5 -
.
8I72008 10:20 AM
2006 2007
~ 2094 2005 Amended Proposed
Actuals Actuals Budqct Budpet
~
305 - Street Bond Fund Boginninq Fund Holanco 2,445,058 1,30,450 1,07,453 800,000
Street Boad Fund itcvenucs
Prooeeds from L7 Debt - 1,202,480 -
tnvestment lnlerest 37,726 33,859 - 56,000
tntertuncl7ranster • 81.628 - -
Total Street Bond Fund Revenues S 37,728 5 914,887 5 1,202,460 $ 16,000
Street Bond Fund Expenditures
Services B Charpes 304 28,967 - -
Intertund'I'ronsler 1,174,419 375,827 1,202,400 8i6,000
Total Street Bortd Fund Expendilures 1,174,323 405,694 1.202.460 8i6,000
Street Bond Fund Estlmated Fund Balance 5 1.363,450 S 1.017,453 S 1.Q1 S -
,453 2006 2007
2004 2005 Arnended Proposed
Atluals Actuals Budqet Budqat
306 - COBG Fund Beginning Fund Balanco - - - -
GDBG FunA Revenues
Grant Proceed., 267,803 438,850 - -
►~dsflellaneous Revenue - 315 - -
InterfundTrarufer - 177.086
d~ Investment lnterest 134,941 3,982 - -
~ J
/
-
Total CDBG Fund Revenues S 402,744 3 572.114 5 - $
CDBG Fund Expenditures
Services 8 Charges - 22.158 . .
CapitalOutlay 402,744 549.959 - -
Total CDBG Fund Expenditures 402.744 572.114 - -
-
CDBG Fund Estimated Fund Balanco $ - 5 S - $
2046 2007
2,004 2005 Amended ProposCd
Actuals Actuals Bu[IpCt Budgcl
307 - CapHnl Gron! , FunA BCyinnin,ry Fund 8313nte - 81,023 - -
Capital Grants Fund Revenu2s
Grant Proceeds 81,004 357.911 6,857,015 5,900,900
InterfundTransfer 97.059 388,914 1,353.335 1,400.000
7olal Capilai Grents Funcl Revenues $ 578,054 5 744,82S S 8,211,D00 $ 7,300,000
Capital Grants Fund Expenditure5
Servioes & Charges 4,915 186,851 1,169,182 -
In;eeitrndTransier • 81,028 -
Capitq,l0uttay 92.111 557,974 7.041,838 7,300.000
7otal Capital Gronts Fund Eapenflitures 97,028 825.853 8,211,000 7,300.060
Capital Grants Fursci E,^.NmateH Funtf Balancc 5 81 028 5 - S - 5 -
8l7Y2006 10:20 AM
20D6 2007 '
2004 2005 Amencted Proposcd
Actuals ACCUAIS Budqet Budnot 308 - Barker Bridge Fund Beginning Fund Balance - (53) (53) -
B.arkar Bridpe Funcl Revenues
Grant Proce8d3 - 113,994 890,400 700,000
Irrvestrnent Interest - - - -
Total Barkcr Bridge Fund Revenues $ - $ 113.994 5 890,400 $ 700,000
Barkcr Bridge Furtd Ezpenditures
5WiCes 8 Gharges 53 113,994 786,469 -
CapitalOuday - - 436.332 700.000
ToiSl 88rker Brldge Fund Expenditurcs 53 513,994 1.722.890 700,000
Barker Bridge Fund EstimatGd Fund 8alarsce $ (53) $ (53) S (332,453) b -
2006 2007
2094 2005 Amended Proposed
Attuals Acwals Bud4ei Btidqet
309 - Park& Capitat Projects Furyd Bepinnirt,ry Fund Balance • - 555,537 1,300,000
P3rfcs Capital Projects Fund Rovenues
Par}cs Grr.nt 200.000
Confibution from SpoOcano COVnIy 1,600,000
Interfurxi TransEecs 650,000 750,000 410,0D0
InvesFment Interest 5,537 - 40,000 ,
Total Parks Capitaf Projects Fund Revenucs $ - S 555,537 S 750,000 S 2,250,000
Parks Capital Projects Fund Expenditures
Services R Gharges - - - -
CapitalOuday - - 1,300,000 3,550.000
Total PaAcs Gapital Projects Fund EapenAttures - - 7.300.aD0 3,550,000
Parks Capftsl ProJects Fund EstimntCA Fund Balance . $ - $ 555,537 S 5,537 5 -
2006 2007
2004 2005 Amended Propossed
Actuals Acwals Budpet Birctqet
310 - Civic Facilitic. Capltal Projects Fund BCginning Balance - - 507,909 600,000
Civic Buildings C3pltAl Projects Fund RCVCiIuCS
tnterfund 7ranslers - 500,000 600,000 6A6,000
Investment Interc,^,t - 7.809 - 30,000
Tofnl Civic Bu(Idings Capital Projects Fund Revenuas S - S 507,900 S 6U0,000 S 630,000
Civic Buildings Cspllfll Projects Fund Expeiiditures
Servooes & CRarpes - - - -
Capital0uttay - - 1.100.00D 1,r0.000
7otal Cfvic Buildings Capital Projects Fund Expendilures - - 1.100,000 1,230,000
/
CtvtC 6uildings Capital Projeet , Estimated Fund BalanGC S - S_ 507,909 S _ 79_0 9 $ 8(712006 10:20 AfJJ
zoos aoos 2007
- - 2004 amcndcd Proposed Propo:.cd
Aduals Budget Budqet Budqet
401 - SQVrer Fund Beglnning Datanco 238,607 - - -
SewerPund Rcvenuos
Investmen! Interr35t 334 - - •
tntertuntl 7ransters - - - •
-
Total Sewer Fund Rovenues S 334 $ - 5 - $
Sewer Fimd ExpenCl(tiires
Inierfund Transfer 237,344 - - -
IntergavemmentAl Pi.yment3 1.596 - - -
Tatal Sevrer Furtd Expenditures 238,941
Sewer Estimated Fund Balertce $ - $ - $ - $ ~
2005 2006 2007
2004 Amendecl Proposed Proposed
Actuals Budqei Bud4et Budqei
402 • StormwatCr Fund Beginning Bafance 556,476 1,269,689 1,277,396 1,145,762
Stormwa6er Fund Revenurs
Storrtmvater Management Fees 776,859 1,252,006 1,524,900 1,600,000
lnvestm_n; Interest 12.394 35,586 15.000 80.000
~ Tatal Stormwa6er Fund Revenues S 789,254 $ 1,287,593 5 1,539,90D 5 1,660,000
Starmwater Fund Expenditures
Safaries 81h'ages - 94,835 147,774 195,031
Supplizs - 24,638 13,490 19,596
Services&Charc}es 65,183 52,372 131,755 153,891
IntergovemmentalPaymeMs 9.658 835,187 1,321,0iP, 1,380,387
Capi1a10utlays - - - -
Iniertun0 Transfers - 272.842 8.899 10,093
Total Stoamwater Ftmd ExUcnditures 7S,641 1,279,885 1,621,534 7,759,002
Stormwater FsUmnted Fund Batanto S 1,269.6E9 S 5.277,395 £ 1,195,762 $ 1.096.760
8l712006 70:20 Af.9
zoos 20D7
2004 2005 Amended Prapo.cd
Actuals Actuals Budqet BvdgCt . 501 - ER&R Fund Beqfnning Balance 674,772 655,542 633,902 800,000
ER&R Fund Revenucs
tn' erlund Transtets 128,134 230,027 208,955 10,000
Imesimenllnterc5t 937 6,288 1,500 30,000
Total ER&R Fund Revcnues • S 129.071 $ 236,316 S 210,465 $ 40,000
ER&R Fund Expcnd(tures
SuppliCS 8,926 - 7,500 7,500
ServiCCs & Chsrges 308 - 50,000 -
Deprecia4ion F.xpense 181,842 257,958 - •
Cap6ta! Oullay 2.388 - 835,757 832,500
Total ER&R Fund Expertditures 193,464 257.956 643.287 840,000
ER&R Est3m3ted Fund Bafancn $ 610,37:3 S 633,902 S 151,110 $ -
2006 2007
2004 2005 Amended Proposed
Actuals ACtuflls BuOUet Budqet
502 - Resk Man3gCmCnt Fund Beginning Ba{anCC 6,378 30,117 25,458 25,000
Risk ManagomCnt Fund Revenues
InvesUnent tnferesi - 768 6,20a -
lntQAurW Tr3nsfgr 134.804 104,887 169,000 185,000
Total Risk Managemcnt Fund Revenues 5 134,804 S 105,555 S 166,200 $ 185,000 •
Risk Management Fund Expendttures
Service5 d CRarges 111,066 110,353 189,93+3 210,000
Tatal Risk Manaqement Fund Ezponditures 111.066 110,313 189,939 210.000
RtSk Management Er>timatetl Fund Balance S 30117 $ 25.458 S 1,719 $ -
Bl712006 10:20AM
~ - . . . _ . . . N-
Proposed 2007
Revenues
~ xpendl*tures
Meeting
; Spokane Va,~ey Counci:'
August 15, 2006
817f200S ~
Budget
Tota I C ity B u d g e#
$76 Million
+Hotel/Motel (Tourism)
+Reserves -
Service Level Stab.
Civic Facilities
Winter Weather
CenterPlace
- - +Parks Capital
sn/2oas 2
General Fund
REvENuES:
Sa les Tax u p$886,000
Property Tax up $1,244,000
Down $245,000 (-3%) frorn 2005
Up $1,244,000 (15%) over 2006
Planning/Building fees down $85,000
EXf'ENSES:
Civic Facilities $600,000
~ Records IVianagement $250,000
Serv. Level Stab. $200,000??
Parks Ins. Reimbursement $1107000
81712006 3
n
General Fud o ..continue
Five new positions
*P ~ans reviewer *Dev. inspector
*Parks mntnce * nfo. Techno ogy (2)
Expenses 2% above our mu tiyear financia
projections
8/7l2006 4
i~1 ~ \
• . , \ ~
Other Hi*ghli'ghts
Sto rm water fee u p$1/ERU
Street Fund trans. from Gen. Fund, $900,000
Street Fund new position (asst. traffic engineer)
Parks Capital includes county's $1.6 miliion
Lodgong tax proceeds up $200,000
Stormwater Fund new position (asst. engineer)
Expect numbers to change as we fine-tune
Public hearing scheduled for Aug.ust 22
sr7f2oos 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check al) that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business [ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending IegislaGon
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Aquatics Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council adopted the Parlcs and Recreation Master
Plan in April 2006.
BACKGROUND: Prior to the 2003 incorporation of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
~ County proposed to build a ne'vu outdoor pool on the south side of Mission Ave across from
Valley Mission Park. Upon the vote for incorporation, Spokane County opted to defer
J construction and offered the $1.6 million construction budget to the City of Spokane Valley. The
funds are available as needed to pay consultants and contractors in conjunction with
design/construction of a new pool.
Since that time, the City completed a Parks and Recreation Master Plan. The adopted Master
Plan lists multiple options for aquatics (swimming pool) facilities.
In order to proceed with design and construction of new or renovated pool facilities, it is
neczssary to decide between the various options.
OPTIONS: 1. Upgrade and add leisure component to three existing outdoor pools. 2. Add large
water play component to one existing outdoor pool and perform basic upgrades to two existing
outdoor pools. 3. Construct indoor aquatic complex. 4_ Others
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Direction to staff.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None if project is within the $1.6 million budget. Increased
operations costs to be determined during design phase.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson
.
ATTACHMENTS Power Point presentation
City of Spokane Valley
• Pool Concepts
Swimmi*ng Concept #1: Upgrade and add eisure
component to three existing outdoor poo s
Concept #2: Add arge water p ay component to
one existing outdoor poo and perform basic
upgrades to two existing outdoor poo s
Concept #3: ndoor aquatic comp ex
. SPOKANE VALLEY
OUTD. OR POO
.
,
} l
~--_,f*
- - 3y1[litr ~
~ • ~ r.
R~~ . •
•
y ~ ~ -'r_ _ ~ ~t - . , f -
' ~ i. 1 • ~ti ~`~'a~' ♦ ' : . r ' . •t• ~ ~ ' ` _
• , . + ' ~ _
li'.~✓~' " Y a ~ 4 j~•~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~
I ;
ril~ilp~~r
~ . ~i ~ ~j~`' ~
r.. _ ^-~j?.-. 1 , °
Valley ~,..►+r,.,.~.._ j. • ' 11' j
.
• O I I 1 P/ •
~
a~
r f - • . ~ ^
~ - ~ ~ •
~ ~ • • ti .~'r
~ ' ~
~ • -
r.. . - b-. , . `
r.. ~ •
- •
.
.r
~ ~ •
_ a ~ f • •
J~.,,_,..--- ~
~
s ~
~
t
f
~
~
~
~
, ~
.~t. ~ j o-.~.
' V . . y ~ ,~i` . 'A. Y -
`y ~
~ ~ •
` \ ` ' ~ ~ , . '
~ ~
, ~ 7r
. ` . _ _ ~ , ~
~ • ~ . ,
. ~ ~ . ~ ~ :':ir't~ .
.1~ ,~,~F~ ~
j-T" ~ t ^,~~i~~
~ s r~•+ ~
i7
r ` ~
' _ l ~ S i
_ r A~
~
~ , •
t~~ ~ -
1 . ~
. ,
,
r
_ . ~
~ 1• ~
,
~ ~
Ji
~
. ~ ; . 1` . • ~ ; ~
. ~
-
.
* {
_
•.p.~~ ~
a { ~
~
~
~
. .
POOL DESIGN TRENDS
OUTDOOR POOLS
; M , r;,~~.. ' ~ -
' 4*'L';A
. ~ ~ •
rs~- = j ~ ~ s . • 1~ , • „ . _ a„ ` 41
_ ~ Y . , . ~ ' ' ' : ! ,
_ ~ ~~'ti~`~~~ .~.,~7~';;. ~ ~ _ . ,r r-r,. '
Stewart f s ~ ~ ~ i i • ,
~ ' ~ ~ ~ , • ~ ~~~~r ~ - .
~ _ . ~
~ ` ` - ~ ~ - ►
~ I ..Q ie ~ L1
~ „
- - • „ s ~ 'i
Heights • D' • O 1 • • P/ •
~
1 ~ ~ • 1
~ ► : ',s~ ~ 1~'`;~ ~r.: `
,t+~~~;~~, ~~~~t" 1~ w•'i
S ~,~M~'~ J`' ~ ^
:7 ''rr ""w. ~
"Sw
.
~
~
'
v ld
i
' t !q
i
f
«
~~Y
. f ~
. 1~av6
t
• ~
t = 1 ~
~
•S ' ( ~
, ~ <
~ ; t+,~ t'.
.
• ~ ' . _
:i~ - ~
- _r,_---~-=
Moses Lake
,
~
`4 ~ ~ ' , s, i
.-r ~
w
y.
- - • . _
. . ~ R ~ " ' _ ~
~
_ ~ - . ! ~ _l • ~ T ~ "/~J
.~~,yl~►• ~ . • . , ~ ^
~'~~~~•r. ...r 'r"
1
Indoor Pools
' ti. , I`r1 ~M~II~~~~i~, ~~~•w~1 ~ „~M~'~ l ~
S
~ ■ - ~ ~ ' w~~~ ~
• ~ -40 d► i ~ .
• ~ • ~ Y~ ' ~ ~
•
'6
r '
11=%
~f du
o AM
-
, ..fA .
~ - . ~ ,
- - - - - ~ - iY►
4 46
~ ~ 'f •a
r-.
. ~ _ ~ .
I'
' ~ ' ~P~A _w_ , ~ ~
l~~/~a
,
Grays Harbor Family YMCA - Wave Pool
~ _
wr~.~.►•':~ - ~ • r-.-
7
~-r- r'~'~'.~ ~:T~~~7!' or •ir~.:~.:lR/~11►`1~ %S _ ~r ~
j, ,~•4L~ Y(~~~~``"'~.i+~rr~`~ - - ~ ~F-
CiM'=.~~Tr..."~~
"~I _~s~.~I~ ~'~!r-~a w.' s i R ~ . ..v ~i
lL7 1' 'p~r.rav.. - ~rwz-~a+_l~_~.~eara~~• wers •
u& . ` r~l.r S~q1`~ ' • J~~ a.~~r~ ~ • ~`a.~.w. ~71 ~f '1~'~~~
N:y~~ r I
` :1E :~~V~1~~~~~O1~Quu~~~1 ~~r~~ r•~ _
- - • - - .
, •lt.~►k--J • L-~..,.
7,: •~s.. '~i- ~
l ;f/
~61;~ ~ •y ,
• ~ ~ ~ ' ' , ~ , '
n J. ~ ~ r' • . . '
-7+' -.r• . j '
~ A • `
, ~y a
1
~_1=.•' ;
~ tr0
' - . • . - - i r , ` .
~ ~ ~ ~ r ; , - , ~ ' ~
A~,bk~~~C~
Kamloops o / ' / w • • • . ! • • tower
p Sra Parks
1 • ~ r~~~.~ 1t ~ , - .
. ''t~ •~~-'1 ~
. .
. ;
' ~ - • ti .
~y
.k.. ; '
a
,r .
„ ~
.
. ~ A4 ,i'°•l'~ ` ~
~ ~ • S fF'~ ~ S r _ . :}~~r
,
. , ,
Y a.
•i 1 ~f . l.~
-
.;114„ .`si~• V;,
~
. , w ' . • ~ ~ . .
✓ _
. ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ^ _
~ f , . , .r- ..rot=°
. . t ' "."F . ~ • ~ . s.
OLIter Agencies
City of Spokane o • o , Request
for Qualifications for • swimming pool
stud
y
Spokane County op' 'd . ' aquatics
facility 2005 / ' • 1 o Hatch
Road I , will open another / ' Is' I 1
Freya on the South late this, I / ,
next.
Nict e
Spokane County North
Aquatic Facility
, .r
, j,,,• ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
. A .
~pw~ 1;,.,,~; • •
~
~ ~ ' y g Jf
~ - ~ . e 1{~ • ~ .ir~ Y !
~ ~ y • . • 1~ • ~
r ~ wl ~ii
~ I r ~ ~+1 ~ I .
jA.
~
' c
y
Y"
. ~ ►
~ , ' , • . ~ '
.~+"r~•~*~. ~ , ~
~ ,
~
r
~ • '1 ~ ~ ►~'~`i ~ ' f `
~ , i •i
«
1` ~ . _r ~,1~ ~ 1 '1 ~
` ~ ~ ~ ~
. ~ g ~ ~
;1~
. : i ,c` a' ~ _ - ~ [
1 , : ~
i-
concept# Upgrade I d 1 1 1 leisure
~ , door pools
three .
o . to
•
»-•T L~ Y 'AT~
%.~rl 7tL1'~- u
~
~ ~4L
~ . ' 4 ~ V . N• .
• W' _ : q....
f- ~ ~ ~ M+
y r~s~ 4 96GIG
' . . • 1
~ to 2c i ~ .
AITD SEV£RAL AQUA1
1'~~,
FEATURES TO EAC"
EXt9TlNG OU?DOCP '
Cc?5t • 5i.574.000 .
CtT,y OF SPOK1►NE vnt-L~'r
~
. ~
~
_ ~ ~
y ~ ~
14 . •
. ~ ,
~ ~ -
_ _ ~
~ •
.
+ ~
' a►
~ :
~ R ~
,
_ , ~ ,
~
~ T~ ~
_ ~ . ~
, ~ ~
. ~
~ ~ ls h ~ ,
~ ,
~ ~ _ ~4
r ' . ~ ~
~ ~
~ a`` - 1
d ~ ~
~ ; ~
w _ -
~r ~
d ~ ~c~` _ _ t
~ , . ~
+ ~ ~ ~
~~d ki
~
~ ~
~ ; '
~ ~
~ :
~ ~ ~ w.
. ~
r~=~ ~
Concept #2: Add large water play component to o
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ poo-I (VaUey ~ ~ perform
basic pgrades to two e ~ outdoor p-oolls
~
~
IAa:~~'
IL
I ~
- ~
T..fY
Concept -#3: In.do"or Aq atic Complex
'2.5 ete 501 Meter Pool
~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ ~
~ . ~ ~
Fcy+t~~rf.~~c+~r~u I ,J .
ra9ifF rrarqol}.,
. L eMr~
,
- .
. ~ ~ -
"~I F . - ~ q • ~ ~ ~ IL
'i -
I ~ '~•"'~.r _ - - I
" t
9'r'~! s~l~p 'ii F •
Y ~
a~ +k_
~ - r.l' yV' IF'FP4fJW! AIIfJIIi~Th~
a p . ~.3Gel.~~TIfYC9PxI:E3~T€M
4W74Y8iiiD AM €,'OV . ~h tOn n7r,
i ~ ;i .r": -•...r
Staff Recommendations
o• o
Staff - o - ds pursuing
Upgrade .d .id ' ' components o "
three - • outdoor pools.
m This or on distributes - - o _ o _
ommunity.
o This option is « ' .ble with ' funds
currently . • . 1 +
Other Considerations
new indoo aquatics
Coeur d'Alene building a
omplex. Consultants . d ORB) feel
ould impact ' o . facility Spokane',:
Valley
Option 2. Fo - • o1 major i1
. ' Mission Pool is . good op ! b •
constraints.
$2.63 estimated . / " eeds
ava ♦ / e ftinds b ►
, a , / ' ^ / w o , w
• 1 , I major racilities ^ by side
rrr " a ~
Advertise for Reques-t for Qualification.s for
~
. a . es for the oncept
e e~ This will include a short series of mee ~ ~
_
incorporate public input into final design.
Discussion/Questions
CIT',r oF SPOKANE r~~~~EY
Request #or council Action
Mee#Irtg Daba: 15 August 2006 C[t'y Manager Sign-o"ff.
ttenn: Check ali that apply: El consent M olc# busaness 0 new business ❑ ptib11~ hearirtg
0 inforrnaban M admin report 0 pending Iegislation
AGENQA IfiEM TITLE : Hw-ard Enventory Analysis Report
GC.3VEFCNIN+G LE~`aISErATION: 44 CFR 201
i PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN; hlons
BACKGRO'UND. St~ff has prewiausly m$t vwrth C4 ~ouncif to update them Gn the pragress of I
the Hazard 1nven#ary and "Vu1nerabildy Analysis (HIVA) ancf #he AiE Ha.zard Mitig ation F'lan.
This evening Darrell Ruby, Spok.ane CNtylCaunty []epartmen# of Emergency Managerr~erit, will
present a PowerPoint discussion conc-eming th~se efforls and giving Cify CvurrCiE an atididional
opportunifiy for input or to have questions addresseci prior to fann-arding the ptan on fo~ ~~proval.
`i`he comple#ed draft plan may be viewed at:
http:ffwww sDoka±~esoTjnQv ofqiemE-rQencvmc;mt1da4a"mp+'SookaneCourit,iMriiaat-,.,nRanDRAFT
6 odf
pPTlONS. Provide inpijt into the Plan usang the Cornr~ent Sheet.
~ REcv~~ENDEn ~CTION oR MOrION: Nor,e at tnas time
BUDGET;rFlNA#+1CI14L IIWPACTS; None ak this tirne
STAFF CONTACT: Buildang C?ffcial Scholtens
ATTACHMENTS
E~~r,utive Surnmary vf the Mftigaborr Plan
Public Comment ~heet
PowerPo'rni Presentation
! \
INTRODUCTION Duriog the past few years; landslides; flooding; and wildfires in Qur state and courity
garnered national headlines. These include the Hangman Hills fire in 1987, the 1997 Ic.e
Starm; thc 1996 Bnwic Lake fire; 2001 drought seasan, and the 2001 3.5-1. earthquake.
Continuing-conc.erns over these and re;lated issues have prompted many communities to
re.evaluate the need for adequate haz.ard mitieation planning. Good planning can mitigate
the impacts from such hazards as wildfire; drought, floods, unstable slopes and ex.panding
soils.
E'lanning and tNZitibation .
It is important ta note that in thc conteat of this report, the ternis "planning" and
"mitigation" refer to preparation for actions to reduce thc impact of natural or hurnan
caused disaster as well as emergency planning thai describes «That actions will be taken to
deploy resourt;es during adisaster. ldeally, local government cmergency and land use
planning efforts work together seamlessly to protect the health; safety and welfare of
citizens. . - :
Whv Yliin for I-Jazards in Spokane County? 'Nlatural hazards impact citizens, proper[y, the environment, and the economy of Spokane
County. Flnoding, landslides, windstnrms, severe winter storms, volcanoes, and
earthquake.s have exposed Spokane Counry residents and businesses to the Financial and
e.motional costs of recoverinQ after tbe.se nalural disasters. Uther events such as: urban
ftre, terrorism, and hazardous material spills also pose dangers to the population of
Spokane CounYy. The risk associate.d wiLlr iiatural hazards inercases as more people
mAVe to areas afCecteci by hazards. The inevitabi lity of natural ha'r.a,rds, and the growing
populatinn and activity, wit}.in the countj, creaie an urgent need to develop strategies,
coordindte resources, a.ncl inere3se public awareness to reduee risk and prevent loss Gom
fiiCtiire ha7ard events. Ideneifyinp risl:s posed by hazards, and dcveloping strategies to
reduce the impact of a hazarc3 cvent can assist in protecting lifE and prQperty of'citizens
and eominunities. Local residents and businesses can work together with the c;ounty to
create a h,ards mitigation plaii that addre.sses the pote.ntial impacts UI' hazarcl events.
A MulYi-.Jurisclictional Hazard A'Iifibalion Plan
This is a multi jurisdiction bazard mitigation plan [hat includes the unincorporated area.s
nf Spokane County, the Cit}' of Spokane and the Cily of Snokanc Valley.
kepresentatives of each of these rnunicipal entities participated in the development of the
plan. The other towns and cilies of the Counh, declined to participate fully; however, the
information and selected actions in the plan are avaiJable t'o these communities for later
adoption. Unless noted specifcally, all goals, objectivcs and actions are for the tttree
participant conmlunities.
7
SUMNtARY OF PLAN GOALS, OBJECTfVES :
AND ACTION STATEMENTS
Listed below is a summary of Spokane County's; Cityo uf Spokane's and City• of Spokane
Vallcy's all hazards mitieation goals, ob~jectives and actions campilett by the Al] Ha-rards
M.itigation Coiumittee frorn citizen participation, the cammittee`s,,vork and
aeeompanying technical information. Detailed statements re•lated to each hazard are
contained within this plan however this sumiliary is a quick referznce. The action
statcmen[s have be divided into ttiro tiers. `rier 1 actions are those Nvhicll directly mitigaie
the ialpaets of any hazards and may be eligible for 1=F M,A's I-[azard 'Mitigation Grant
Progr'am. °1'ier 2 accions compliment Tier I actions, are impor[ant to the plan and may be
eligible for other source.s qf funding. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES PREVEtVTlON .
• Reduce tbe risk.s associatcd with natural a`nd human c.aused hitcards.
• Create and maintain a system that evaluates natural and human caused
hazards and their potential fc►r risk to life, health, and property.
• Encuurage public: and private cooperation in disaster midgation Planning. • Work to insure that all local land development plans and regulations lessen
thc impact of potential hazard and human eaused disasters.
Objeetives
, o Develop a continiiously reviseci data hasc that identifies and ubjectively
priorit'v,es natural and human caused hazards.
o Establish a cansistent mcthod for collecting and comparing data about
all hazards.
o Educate the public about hazard risl:s, avoidance and miri;ation.
o Ensure that there is consistency and coordination behveen crifical
areas plxns, policies and regulatiuris and betwecn juritdictions.
o Cantinue to work to reduce financial and social impacts of disasters
throubh prevention.
o Identify gaps in potential respuuse and protecfian activities and find
resources to closc these gaps. o Implement an ecnergency communication system to comptiment othcr
early w•arnin; systemti such as NOAA's.
8
PROPERTY.PROTECT.IpN
A Protect critical public faciliYies and infrastruehire from passible damage do
to h aza rds.
• Keduce the impact of hazards on the built en-Oronment.
Objecti.ves
oEncourage and suPport defensible space and preventive construction
practices. •
oPromute the use af appropriate hazard resistaticc structural methods fur
buildings.
o T'romote individuat and family planning fur individual property
protection and mitigation. -
o R'ork with municipal staff, elected offici,als and dev-clupers to review land
use ordinances and infrastructure codes to ensure tha't they include
adeqtia[c property protection. .
o Identify porYions of thc built en<<ironme.rit that share common hazard
vulnerzibility. - , _
o Iclentify and continue to impruve the security of all essenXial criYical
facilities. ~ - - o Promotc personal E°•ireWise plans. oPlrin for adeyuate access and cQress to pruperties fur first respc►nders and
CItI7_E.RS.
o Consider impacts o * f natural hazards un future land use.
PUBLI(.' ED U`C'f1 TION A.ND A «'.A KENESS
• T_nsure that all citicens, includinb those with special neecls, are aware of
potential h.tzards and disaster preparedness.
08jertires '
o Cducate the publie about 6azard mitigation, prepareclness and
prcvention. o Aevelop a disaster rreparedness and mitigatiun public information
prograin to be disseminatcd by the media, neighborhood groups, mail
and school.
o Prornotc persunal respunsibility for disaster preparedness and mitigzition.
o Impro<<e tbe public's understxntling of the locatiun and potential impacts
of natural hazards.
o Incc►rporate the needs af cifizens w'ith special needs iaYo all aspects of
planning to includc transnortatioci and dther rcyuiremcnts.
o Promote disaster preparedness and mitigatiun in the public schools. o Create the upportunity for agencies and busincsses to cooperate in
communicating the necd fur disaster mitigatiun and preparedness.
9
o Recruit business, ci<<ic leaders and children's grauPs to participate in :
eommunieating the neecl clisaster mitibation and prep~ireclness.
i'YATIIKAL R.ESDURC'ES
• Balance natural resource preservatinn with life, property anci safety
protection.
Objectives
a Advocate "best management" practices for deti'elopment to reduce
potential losses from disasters. o Reduc.e conflicts betwecn high intensity land uses and naharal hazards.
o Fromote environmentally conscious aquifer protertion regulations.
o Maintaiu the natural systems that p'rovide flood prutection, i.e.,
shorelines and wetlands. .
o Restrict de<<elopment in critical'arcas whcre hazards exist.
0 1'romate prnjects that mitigate impacts, on the environ►nent '
FM.F.RGEA'CY SER T!ICES -
• Insure effecCive and efficient emer¢ency response and recovery capabitities to reduce the loss of life and property durin; and sifter a disaster through mitigaYion actiuns. . - ' • .
• Estatilish and maintain a reliable comrouoications system behween public respondcrs and with the general puhlic duriug a disaster.
• Incorporate the neecis of citizens with spec.ial needs into all aspects of
planning to include transportEtYion dnd other reyuirements.
Ubje"ctires
o VVork tow-ards thc county-wide distribution of cmergency supplies.
o Continuc to develop a registry of peoplc who havc special needs.
0 1'rc-dcploy emergency suFplies to various aeographic locations.
o I'mplcmcnt and develop a.joint information plan for the Fmerbency
Qperarions Center.
o Share comniunication protocols between agencies.
o Provide power back-up,and system operability for critical infrastructure
during a disaster. ,
- o T+;valuate'and upclate information on tlie capacity of fuod banl:s and
shelters.
o Create neighborhood level disaster mitibation plans and courclinate these
with city and regional plxns.
o Encourage National Oceauic and Atmospheric Administration radio
uwnership.
e I~.nsure that all communications to the public is consistent.
10
0 17eve1oP eftecCive mutual aid plans for all first responders.
STRUCTURAL PR4JECTS
• Suppart the building of structural projects that will significantly reduce the
impact of hazards but that do not create additional environmental harm.
Objectives
o Adnpt clesign standards for earthyuakes, flouds and winds.
o Fvalu<<te buildingis, bridges, criticxl facilities and other structures for
hazard resistancc. o lmplemcnt retrofit prdjects for critical f'aeiGtics as funding pe.rmits.
o Promute backup ingress and egress for wildland /urban interface zones.
o Evaluate existing thoroughfares for potentially hazardous situations.
a Identify any PotenYial evacuaeio►i bottlenecks. o Idetttify potential imp.lct of dam failures Cor potential risl:s tp property
and life.
o Investicyate incentivcs for clevclopers and oFVncrs tn upgrade existing
buildings.
o Expedite approval proce,tses for projects that impro<<e strtictural
resistance to hazards. .
o Determirie the need for resiclcntial flood mitigation through elevation,
relocation, or acyuisition.
o Revieiv hazardous materials transportatian reyuirements.
Action Statemcnts
AL.L SA7ARD5
'1'ier I
A1 Utilizinb Spnkane County's GTS system, dcvelop a hxzards data base that
identifies the potential loca6on and estimates patEntial severity of all nataral
and human caused hazards.
A2 Publish hazard maps that are available to the comrnunity at libraries and
other locatinns and an the county's website.
A3 lJsing the huards data basc, upload data into FEINIA's HA7US softwarc to
continually monitor the risk to citizeris and propcrty.
i
~ . J.,
11
YOU, TOO, CAN HELP
PREVENT DISASTER DAfVIAGE
Please help the Spokane County
Hazard Mitigation Committee
Spokane County's Hazard Mitigation Committee has received a grant
to prepare an all hazards mitigation plan. The committee has* been
formed to assist in the preparation of this plan. The_ planning effort
will identify actions to reduce damages created by natural hazards.
These hazards include wildland fires, floods, ear-thquakes, tornados
and high winds, winter storms, and landslides. The committee asks
you to assist them in the identification of problems associated with
these hazards and suggest solutions to these problems.
Some Hazard Facts
o Nationally, the 2000 fire season was the worst wildland fire season
O since 1910 with nearly 7,000,000 acres burned costing
$1,600,000,000.
o Human activity is 7 times more likely to be the cause of a wildland fire
than lightning strikes
o In 1996, an ice storm caused four deaths and $22 million dollars in
damage in Spokane County.
o Flooding in Spokane County has caused the declaration of a disaster
three times since 1980.
o In June 2001, a 3.5+ earthquake struck Spokane.-
What can you do to help? Turn the sheet over and find
out.
's
,
Your ideas are important!!! Use the space below to list your most
important issues concerning hazard damage management or write
comments, draw or sketch anything else you would like to say about the hazards listed on the front in Spokane County.
,
Thank you for your time and ideas. Please return this comment sheet
to your committee member or send it to Fred Hurand, Department of
Urban Planning, Public and Health Administration, 668 N Riverpoint
Blvd., Spokane, WA 99202, or Email it to fhurand@mail.ewu.edu.
Spokane County Mufti-
Jurisdictional AI! Hazard
Mitigation Plan
Pr~~_•rt~d 0n Uc;ialr et the ~rcr:3r~- ~~cuni~ Moii;: , en
Comntrtfee to: v
Spokane Gounty Board af Caunty Carrmissinnerq
Spokane City Ceuncil
Spokane County Mutti-
Jurisdictional All Hazar•d
Mitigation Plan
WILDFIRE TORNADO FL D
~
_ • _ ' .
• , r~-r `
.r-.
1
The Committee
• lk Fre! HtrsM • Eestn'-) WBShmgiGi • Chu7c Hatrwr - S:qk3-ie VaUey, GFize-
Urnve°xtY- ChaK Uroen and RapKora( . pltk Behm . Spoka'K= VaIley. Citizan
Planrunp bepalment • Mlchnla Mahef _ gPpAane VAfley. Chamber
• /vo&e 5kels - Eastem Wastw+Qton af Canmaca
UnweRlty, GnduDtE S:uder! . Ck. Marp~net Mor'.z . WBEhinqian Stste
. tJeown Gunronp . Easwm Wsahon~ Unrvdrs~ry, EnGnee'n0
Urnvwsrty. Graduate 54rdervt . Jyn qohertY .~~e F'ue - Publk
Ed~c~tw^r Spec~~ Noe~~
• Tom Atetlam • CM+~+ntY ~P+'m1°"! °'f
Eme*Da^cY MwLa9ameu . Rarmty Bersson - ERWua HenM Servlces
. parrell R:by • CrtV"Cou"tY DeWrtmerA of . Qavs WYrKx . 5poka" 5nertfl
Ernerp-Y mwqwT1°d - G1 MoDe0y . gpokeno Poitct
• Ma:ty 9est - W/1 State htWaUo^ . CynMw QachUor - Red Cross
• .ta'm VanSant - Spokane Rep)anst 41aaAh . .Ix 93d5en - Spokane S&Oo1 i}Wjid Bt
Dsstr+Ci Jonn 8alQwin • S~karro CommuntlY
• Elw~arJ Lewis - Cna1r. IEFGA Oneqtea Po~+oa Eflo~f
- Fetbt CheneY - C~11 d~9nc. Rcsk
managmT'Orip Tarn Ta+Py - Spokane CammunlN Onentsd
• JMn MRrr~r - CltY of Sqakat~e. PuW~: Works ~ Potice~ Lnnri
• Marina Srkup - Spokane Va1ey, Commurnty , Gary RkharCS - S;+okAW CommLcafY
C1evrPtsnnirp Orient~d Pof~oe E9ort
. Tcxn Si7tailen • Spokane VWbey. $Wkfinp , ~i 1{amais - Ctry d RockRoro
o++ic~r • 1N~e Neaon • Cfry.~Coun1Y Depailmont ot
• Te9 Otson • WA DeP~Une^t o[ EoolopY EmergerxY ~sn°qe~'urA
, Gerry GamrnO - SOoka^e Gxrn!Y. PubGc . Ross KoIlaY • Spokane CourttY E^Dineer
Wohcs • id~n Bntlslli - Saoksne Cawn!y, GtS
• Randi Rich - A+~
lanVonEseen - Spokar'e Cx+ntY, GlS DaVtd P'ay • SDokese County, GtS
• '
Some Hazard Facts
Nationally, the wildland
fire season of 2000 was _
worst since 1910 with `
7,000,000 acres burned _
costing $1,600,000,000.
: 1!'f
'iti~~•~ - . s ~
2
Some Hazard Facts
The 1996 ice storm _ "caused fvur deaths
and $22 million in •~~I
damage in Spokane
County. - -
Svrrte Hazard Facts
There have been
~
thr~e declaredflood
~ .
disasters ir~ ~pokarie ~
Coun#y since 1980.
J'
t ~
9'l pf6'af'~F L/dC'3 :;ifl h,Aa y ifj, Si3
~
Some Hazard Facts
'
In June 2001, a 3.5 +
earthquake struck
Spokane
Purpose of the Plan
• The local mitigation plan is the representatian af tne
jurisdiction's commitment to reduce risks from natural and
man made hazards.
• The pian serves as a guide for decision makers as they
commit resources to reducing the effects of hazards
• The plan serves as the basis for the State to provide fechnir.al
assistance and',o prioritize project sunding
4
Why a Hazard Mitigation Pian
• Reduce damages caused by natural and human
caused disasters.
• Save lives.
• Improve disaster response.
• Receive grants for disaster preparedness.
All Hazard Mitigation Ptan
• Goals and Objectives:
- Save Lives
- Prevention
- Property Protection
- Public Education and Awareness
- Natural Resources
- Emergency Services
- Structural Projects
• Action Statements
5
The Mitigation Strategy
A strategy that provides the Jurisdiction's
blueprint for reducing the potential losses
identified in the risk assessment, based on
existing authorities, policies, programs and
resources, and its ability to expand on and
improve these existing taols.
The Hazard Mitigation Planning
Process
1. Organize Resources (Sept 2005)
A. Review Existing Data Including Hazard
Inventory and Vulnerability Assessment
2. Assess Risk (Oct 2005)
A. Update Hazard Inventory and Vulnerability
Assessment
6
The Hazard Mitigation Planning
Process (cont)
3. Devefop a Mitigation Plan
(Oct 2005 - June 2046)
• Committee Sets Goa(s and Objectives
• Committee Prepares Action Plan
• Community Reviews Actions
► • Committee Revises Plan
• Municipalities and County Reviews Draft
Plan
• Draft Plan to State Emergency Management
Division and FEMA for Review and Approval
• Adoption of Plan by Local Jurisdictions
The Hazard Mitigation Planning
Process (cont)
4. Implement and Monitor the Plan
A. Various Agencies Given the Responsibilities
for Implementing Actions
B. A Mitigation Committee will be Designated
to Monitar Outcomes
C. The Plan will be Reviewed Annually and
Updated at Five Years.
7
Ap~~rovai of #he Plan.. W~~~~s
Ahead
• Finish editing the plan and haCd firtal pub1ic
meetings-
* Submit the PIan to State Emergency
N4anagement ~ivision (EMD) for revtew,
State ENlC~ ~orwards the PIan to FEMA #or pre-
adoption reviewlapproval.
• The PIan is Required to be Adop'ted via
Resolution.
- FEMA approrres the Mitigation PEan_ ~
~ I
I
Any Questions?
Thank you.
~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 15 August 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Iie111: Checic all that apply: U+an.rnt ❑ ohf bJSmeS~ now hu-Ane-ss ] pitAic he-vkng
ininRn3bnn [-lacimin, repcxt ❑ {r.-roing Ie-gisiatinii
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Admin[strative ReNort: Right of Way Process Update
GOVERN.ING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Munidpal Code; Chapter 10.05 Artide II.
Construction Work and Activity within Right-of-lM1lay
PREVIOUS COUNQL ACTION TAKEN:
Ordinance 63-03, Master Fee Sthedule 2006
BACKGROUND: On April 11, 2006 Slaff presented a report to Council that examined the Cty's
current Right-of-Way (ROW) process and campared it to the process of otlier Washington
cities... This presentation follows-up on that report by examining differcnt ROW permitting
options availab{e to the City and providing a staff recommendation .
OPTIONS: Continue implementation of the Municipal Code Chapter 10.05 Artide II,
as approved by Council, or amend the code to indude a revised ROW permitting
pnooedure.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Direct s*aff to revise ROW procedure
acoording to Coundl desires.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Fees will recover costs.
STAFF CONTACT: Spokane Valley Building Official Scholtens; Morgan Koudelka Administrative
Ana lyst
ATTACH M ENTS:
PowerPoint Presentation
RProcess Update
City of Spokane Valley
Building Division
i
Tom Scholtens, Building Official
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst
i
ROW History
11
• Presentation to Counci on Apri 11, 2006
• Ad-Hoc Committee Presentation on June 18,
2006
Morgan Koudelka, /1d~~-mistrative
~ August 15, 2006 Analyst
Road Obstruction / ROW Permit
' Purpose
• Protect the safety and genera we fare of the
trave ing pub ic
• Protect the pub ic interest in the right-of-way
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15. 2006 Analyst
,
ROW Permit - Current Requirements
• Any person working in the pub ic ROW must
get a permit (Work done by or for the City is
exempt) -$70 for a permits, regard ess of
staff time.
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
i
r
~
Current Spokane Valley Process
• 1 Permit Specialist
- 30% of total time spent on ROW permits
; • Determines age of street and assigns appropriate tier
• Enters into PLUS system
• ROW I nspector
- 100% of total time (1 open FTE )
• Checks Call Before You Dig Database
• Inspections
• Looks for violators and notifies company
• Enters information into PLUS
• Traffic Engineer
- 10% of total time spent on ROW permits
• Looks only at obstructions that re-route traffic
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
Current ROW Process - Pros
• Record of a activity
~
• Simp e to process and ca cu ate fees
~
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
_ * August 15, 2006 Analyst
i -
~i
iI
~ Current ROW Process Cons
~~Cumbersorne for ~sers - Individual permit required
for every obstruction regard1ess of duration.
`o Inequi~~~le Fees - All obstructions require $70 fee
regardMess of number of inspections required or
r~~cessity for review by Traffic Engineer.
9 Current Municipal Code requires mobile and short
duration activities to be permitted but it is unlikely
that ~~~~~~~~~n would be possNble.
' Morgan Koudelka, AdministratEve
August 15, 2006 Analyst
, .
Road Obstruction / ROW Permit
Reasons for Change
o To simplify the process far frequer~~ ~OW
users/obstructers.
9 To er~sure high p~rmitting compliance.
;
o To er~sure cost r~~overy.
9 To implement a fair fee fa~ the work perfiormed by
City ~~aff.
~i 9 AlI ~he ~~ove reasons ser-ve t~e two main goaIs of
pro#ecting the public safety and protecting the pub1ic
infrastructure.
,
Morgan Kaudelka, Admintistrative
* August 15, 2006 Anaiyst
I
Franchise Agreements
; 9 Not a uti ities have franchise agr~ements.
' 9 No system in place for ca cu ating franchise
fees.
• Current franchise agreements do r~~t match
current ROW process.
,
Morgan Koudelka, Adminiskra#iv~
August 15, 2006 Analyst
~
Road Obstruction / ROW Permit
Procedure
- Types of ROW Permits
• Non-Cut Obstruction without clean-up - 1 inspection
• Non-Cut Obstruction with clean-up - 2 inspections
• Pavement Cut Obstruction Non-Winter - 3 inspections
• Pavement Cut Obstruction Winter - 4 or more
inspections
. Long-duration or large-scale projects may require
additional inspection time
~ Morgan Koudetka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
i
ROW Process -Options
m 0- 1
1. A obstructions require a permit (Current)
; 2. No permit required for any non-pavement
cut obstruction
3. Develop categories of activities
(Recommended)
' • Some low-impact ROW activities exempt
• Annual permits offered
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
Option 1- All Activities Require Permit
• Ensures damage is repaired and c ean-ups
performed for a obstructions. Protects
pub ic safetY and infrastructure.
• Cost y and time-consuming for user.
• Does not exempt routine activities such as
' trash pick-up and mai de ivery.
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
. ~ August 15, 2006 Analyst
I
~ Option 2- No Permit Required
Limited oss of protection of Pub ic ROW.
• Significant oss in the protection of the pub ic
safety.
• Easier administration.
• Greater iabi ity risk.
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
Option 3 (Recommended) - Exempt
- Some Activities and Offer Annual
- Permit
0 - - - m I
• Mobile and Short Duration Activities (as defined by the Manual
on Uniform Traffic Control Devices) will be exempt
- Less than 1 hour
- Daytime only
• Frequent ROW users can apply for an annual permit and send
notifications by fax or e-mail.
• Protection of public safety and public infrastructure is
maintained.
• Process is easier and more cost-effective for frequent users.
• Process is less intensive to administer.
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
' August 15, 2006 Analyst
♦
Option 3- Detai Is
0- 1
• All street closures require a permit.
• If entire street not closed - mobile and short-duration obstructions (As
defined by the MUTCD) do not need a permit.
- Obstructers must still utilize traffic control devices per MUTCD
• All other obstructions require a permit (and will be inspected)
• Traffic Control Plans (TCP) reviewed by the Traffic Engineer required
, if permit is required and:
1) More than 50% of street is closed, or
2> Work is on an arteriai.
• Annual permit offered for frequent users of ROW.
- Notification still required
~ - Inspections perFormed
- Fees still recovered
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
Current Fee Calculation
• Tota Annua Cost Divided by Avg. Number ofi
Annua Permits (Current)
- Cost rounded down to $70
- Pros: Simple to calculate, easy to administer
- Cons: Does nofi take into consideration different
;
time requirements fior different types of ROW
pe rm its
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
;
August 15, 2006 Analyst
Recommended Fee Calculation
Pre-set fees according to type of obstruction
f
• Fee based on work performed
• Total cost recovery
• Fees vary based on :
' - Number of inspections (varies according to
duration of obstruction, type of obstruction, and
season)
- Involvement of traffic engineer (reviews traffic
control plans)
Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
August 15, 2006 Analyst
.
Next Steps= Staff
• Staff
~
- Construct ordinance (if necessary) accarding to
i Council wishes
' - Determine recommended permit types and
' associated costs
~ Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
= August 15, 2006 Analyst
_ _ - - -
f'
Next Steps= Council
.0 Counci
~ Provide fi~~~~ack on ordinance, permit types} and
fee calculation
~ Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
; August 15, 2006 Analyst
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Councii Action
Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 City Manager Sign-off
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin_ report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Tourism Goals Report
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On an annual basis, the Council considers the
funding proposals recommended by the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this agenda item is to seek Council feedback on tourism
goals in advance of the 2007 ladging tax grant proposals. The Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee will soon be finalizing the application packet for grant applicants to complete.
Deputy Mayor Steve Taylor is the Council Liaison to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback for Lodging Tax Advisory
Committee consideration as it prepares for its deliberations on grant applications.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: An estimated $400,000 will be available for award in 2007.
CONTACT: Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor; Ken Thompson, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS
1. Minutes of 8/3l06 Lodging Tax Advisory Committee
2. Hotel/Motel Fund 2007 Proposed Budget
3. 2006 Grant Calendar Schedule
City of Spokane Valley
Lodging Taa Advisory Committce
Minutes of a Meeting Held Augnst 3, 2006
The meeting was called to order by Steve Taylor at 5:00 p.m.
In attendsnce were Steve Taylor, Diana Wilhite, Liz Beck, Brenan Genther, Peggy Daering, Mike
Conway, Ken Thompson, and Charlie Pflieger.
Ken gave a report on the financial status of the HoteUMotel fund as follows:
Estimated 2006 Fund Balance Carry Over $278,000
Estimated 2007 Revenues 375,000
Proposed 2007 Expenditures (400.000)
Esiimated 2007 Fund Balance Carry Over $253,000
Steve suggested the committee racammend to the council that $400,000 be awarded in grants for the 2007
fiscal year. After some discussion Mike recommended that that $400,000 be awardad in grants in
addition to $40,000 being set aside for Center Place. The committee was in agreement to recommend to
Council that $400,000 to $440,000 ba awarded in 2007.
Ken shared with tfie committee a new opinion issued by the Attorney General on Lodging tax
expenditures. Ken emphasizcd that the funds need to be for marketing costs and the need to stay away
from capital outlay items. Peggy suggested the City atxach a cover letter to the grant applicetion
summarizing the Attorney Genernl's opinion letter. A copy of the ruling is attached to the minutes
(Attachment A).
"I'he proposod calendar was reviewed by the committce and adopted (a copy is attached to the minutes).
Ken went over four proposed changes to the grant application. After some discussion all the changes
highlighted in blue on attachment C where adopted.
There being no further business Chairman Taylor adjourned the meeting at 6:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Charlie Pflicger
Hotel ! Motel Fund
,vv0 Hotel Motel Proposed Budget
Estimated 2006 Fund 8alance Carry Over 278,000
Estimated 2007 Revenues 375,000
Proposed 2047 Awards (400,000 - 440,000)
Prior Years Appiic.tions and Funding
i ~
ORGANIZATION ~ 03 Ap I►~I 03 Fundedl 04 A 04 Fundedl 06 AE&OS Fundedi 06 06 Fundec! 1
Friends d ihe Cer~tannisl Trai I 23,4801 OI 2.000 2.0O0I I I 9.000 -
Valley Chambe► d Canmsroe (05 ►eoueet rec'd ieEe) I I I I I 15.4401 I 15.4401 5,000
Plonks Ferty Park I I 71,842I 2D.000I I 1 23.876I
SPdwie Co. Far & Evo CenCer I 58.376 1T.60DI 35.0OOI Z6.OOOI 21,OO0I 1a.G0Ul I
SPOkane ReNional CarArltion & VfsllOrs Bufeau I ZOO,OOOI 63,7OOI 250.0OOI 1b0.0001 200.000I 136,OOOI 200,000I 165,000
SPokane R~~~CanffissW I 120,0WI U=i 150.00DI 100.0XII 100.OMI MOMI 100,OWI 84,=
Spokane Va1ey H"e Museum I 40.0OOI 1,OO0I I 22.100I 10.000I 49,104 5.000
Spakane Valby Jr. Soaer Aasocielion ~ 96,6421 24.900I 71,8421 I I 4000 4.000
Soolro++e VeMeY YMCA ~ 50,0001 16,OOOI I I 12,000I B,OOOI 17.000I 7.000
1 st (wNt1d►e+v roare9t fa 04) f 19,T24I 2.8001 0,7001 I 27,20DI 15.0OOI 25,9001 15,000
Inland NW Dar" AssocMtion ~ I I I ~ I 2,5351
Cente►Piwe I I I I I40.000I 40.0001 40.000
5pokane MnsiV ,ssociatio, I 2,5351 01 2.5001 2.0001 I I I
TOTALS 1 584,7421 200,000I 632,884I 289.OOOI 397.740+ 300.000I 4W,855I 325,000
Amied Fotr.es 8 Aerospaoe Museum ~ 3.3271 01 2,5311 I I I I
Inlend NW Senior Wellrm Canknenoe ~ 12,500I OI I I I I
La~tah Creek Wine Cenms I 20.000I o) I I I I
Sphar,-Dow, Famil„ WakwPork I230,0001 01 I I I I I
SDdcerbArb Conxriaslon ~ 5,0001 OI I I 1 I I
SPOkane Arts Catrrdssion ~ 70,OOOI OI I I I 1 1
Spoksne Horse Breaders a( INand NW I 5.8301 01 I I I I I
Spdwm Pob Ciub I 25.3001 OI I I I I I
Svdkane Polo Gub I 3.4001 OI I ( I I I
SDOkane Pob Club ~ 1,400I OI I I I 1 1
SPdane SymPhow ~ 20,OOOI O) 20.0001 I I I I
SDOkane Winay Assxialion I 7501 OI 5.7501 I + I I
S 1SA Sports Complex I 103,000 OI I I I I I
V..._....Joer I 39,000 OI I 1 I 1 I
TOTALS 1 1,064,249I 200,000I 661,1651 299,000I 397,7401 300,000I 486,85SI 325,000
S M T W T F S S M T W T F 5
2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2006
9 10 11 12 13 14 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
15, 16 17 18 19 20 21 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NOteS:
22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16 17 18 19 20 21 22
29 30 31 2j 24 25 26 27 28 19
3' Grant package available for
pick up - 9118/06
.
5 M T W 7 F S S A1 T W T F S
1 z 3 4 1 z 3 4. :3 Grant proposal to be
56 7 e 910 7 a 910 11 -A'2. submitted 10/13/06
112 13 14 15 16 17 14 15 16 17 18 '.fQ! . 20 21 22 23 24 ~'25' '40 21 22 23 24 zs h Presentations by
2e 27 za zi zs zv 30 31 organizations in ear[y
November
SVLTAC reviews
s, M r w T F s s M r w r F s applications - Mid
1 z 3~ 4< ~'jz Novem ber
6 7 8 9 10 .::3; 4 5 6 7 d: -;?Y ,
13 14 15 16 17 11 12 13 14 15 ~b. COfTItT11tLE'e 1NOfk t0 be
zo 21 u 23 24 18 19 io 21 ucompieted by 11 /17/06
27 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 :`!80 =
Committee
recommendation to Councii
5 M T W T F S 5 M T W T F S 12/05/06
2 3 4 5 6:;.7;"
3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 Council consideration
r
To » >z 13 14 16 17 Is 19 io ~ /approvai of grant
'{b 17 18 rs m 21 23 24 a.s 26 27 proposals 12/19/06
'23 24 25 26 27 28 ' 2i 30 31
.36 1- COfitraG't5 iSSI1E'd - edfij/
January
.
5 M T W T F S S M T W T F 5
1 2 3 4 5_: 1 2 3;4
- 7•. 8 9 10 11 12 6 7 B 9 10 :1I
15 16 17 18 19 13 14 15 16 17
..r:
22 23 24 25 26 20 21 22 23 24 25
29 30 31 27 28 29 30
S M T W T F S S Al T W T F S
1 2 3 1 2
4 5 6 7 8 9 10 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
11 12 13 14 15 16 17 16 11 12 13 14 15 16
18 19 20 21 22 23 24 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
25 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
HoteUMotel Fund #105
Actual Actual ActLal ProJected
2003 2004 2005 2006
Assels
Cash 6.04 1,618.07 487.46
Investments- LGIP 231,307.69 125,260.08 248,360.28
Taxes Receivable 23,044.56 23,142.70 26,089.36
TOtal Assests 254,358.291 150,020.851 274,937.101278,271 _35
Liabilities
Acoounts Payble 32,531.15 13,526.40 22,665.75 0.00
Total Liabilities 32,531.15 13,526.40 22,665.75 0.00
Fund Balance
Equities 221,827.14 221,827.14 136,494.45 252,271.35
Change in Fund Balance -65,332.69 115,776.90 26,000.00
Total Fund Balance 221,827.14 136,494.45 252,271.35 278,271.35
Total Liabilities & Fund Balance 254,358.291 150,020.851 274,937.101 278,271.35
Revenues
Taxes 257,142.85 363,443.52 387,828.90 350,000.00
Investrnent Interest 109.40 1,607.01 6,117.96 1,000.00
Total Revenue 257,252.25 365,050.53 393,946.86 351,000.00
Expenditures
Tourism Promotion 35,425.11 450,383.22 250,014.38 285,000.00 '
Interfund Transfer (Center Plaoe) 28,155.56 40,000.00 "
Total Expenditures 35,425.11 450,383.22 278,169.96 325,000.00
Excess Revenue over Expenditures 221,827.14 -85,332.69 115,776,90 26,000.00
Beginning Fund Balance -(carry over) 0.00 221,827.14 136,494.45 252,271.35
Add: Revenues 257,252. 365,05 0.,Sa~ 393351,000.00
Less: Expenditures 35,42 .11 450,383.22 27896 325,000.00
Ending Fund Balance 221,827.141 13'6,494.451 26-2,271.351 278,271.35
' 2006 Council passed $300,000 budget
Center Ptace $15,000 + Others $285,000 = $300,000
"Aaums Cenber Plm wM get the additlmal i26,000 ~
11Sv-is1lUaerskpflieyerWotel Mabl TaxWolel Motel 03,04,05,06 financials.xla 8/11f20068:14 AM
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of August 10, 2006 10:00 a.m.
Plcase note this is a work in progress; items arc ientative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Au,eust 16. 2006. Ca1hv McMorris Con¢ressional Yisit.1:00 - 2: 00 n.m
CenterPlace Executive Conference Room
Augurt 16. 2006, FEMA Mans - Chester Creek Public Meetinq'. 6:30 n.m. - 8:30 n.»L , Council Chambers
AuPust 22. 2006. Regular Meeting. 6:00 p•m. [due date Monday, August 141
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2007 Revenues, Including Property Taxes
2. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
3. First Reading Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process Ordinance - Mike Connelly [15 minutes]
4. Proposed Resolution in Support of TMDL Foundation Concepts - Councilmember Denenny [15 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Council Sets Budget Hearings for Oct 10 and Oct 24 - Ken Thompson [S minutes]
6. Motion Consideration: Appaintments to Sign Code Committee - Greg McCormick 5 minutes]
7. Motian Consideration: Job reclassification -Nina Regor [10 minutes]
8. Motion Consideration: Geiger Agreement - Morgan Koudellca [10 minutes]
9. Motion Consideration: Spokane Caunty Communications Agreement - Morgan Koudelka [10 minutes]
10. Administrative Reports:
a. Presentation of Preliminary Budget - Uave Mercier [SU minutes]
b. Local Redevelopment Authority (LRA) Follow-Up - Uave Mercicr [15 minutes]
11. Information Only:
a. Department Reports
b. Response to Public Comments [estimated meeting: 140 minutes*]
Ausust 29. 2006 ( no meeting)
Seotember S. 2006 Snecial Meelinu/Studv Sesslon. 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, August 281
1. Motion Consideration: Local Redevelopment Authority (LRA) - Dave Mercier[public commentj(10 min)
2. Outside Agencies Presentation - Ken I'hompson (45 minutes)
3. Update on Spokane County Library District Projects - Mike Wirt, Executive Director SCLD (15 minutes)
4. Annexation Goals & Policies - Mike Connclly (30 minutes)
5. Joint Housing Authority Participation Interlocal - Nina Regor ( 15 minutes)
6. Police Emphasis Areas Report - Cal Walker (15 minutes)
7. Advance Ageada Additions - Mayor Wilhite }
8. Council Check-in - Nfayor Wilhite } (5 minutes)
9. City Manager Comments - Davc Mercier }
TOTAL MINUTES: 135 minutes
Seatember 12, 2006 Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (due date
1. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Comprehensive Plan Amendment Ordinance - Mike Connclly [15 minutes]
3. Administrative Report:
a. C)IcI Senior Center Afike Jack.on [I5 minutes]
b.-Pe.rsc,nnel Clyd~natzCeSlResofuti~ps Nina_Regor _
. [2S minute;l
c.' Appleway LDpdate - Cary Drisk.ell minutesl
T'UTAL.~IINUTES: SS minules
DraR Advance Agenda 8J10/2006 9;49 A1rt Page 1 of 3
Wednesdav, Senlember 13, 2006, Communilv Workshon W. 6:00 n.m. - 9:00 n.m.
Location to be delermined at a later dale
Tkursdw. Sentember 14.1006. Joinl CounciUPlannrng Commissinn Session for SnraQUe Corridor Su6area,
6: 00 a.m. - 9:00 n.m. City Hall, Council Chambers
September 19, 2006 Studv Session. 6:00 p.m. idae date Monday, Sept 11]
1. I7epartmental Budget Highlights and Work Frogam Presentations (90 minutes)
2. Right-of-way Permit Process Update - Morgan Koudelka/Tom Scholtens (15 minutes)
3. Advance Agenda Additions - Mayor Wilhite }
4. Council Check-in - Mayor Wilhite } (5 minutes)
5. Ciry Manager Comments - Dave Mercier } TOTAL MINiJTES: 110 minutes
SeAtember 26.2006 Regular Meetin%. 6:00 Q.m. [dae date Monday, Sept 181
1. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Levying Property Tax [lU minutes]
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Confirming Excess Property Tax Levy [10 minutes]
4. Administrative Reports:
a. Fee Resolution - Ken Thompson [15 minutes]
5. Information Only:
a. Departrnent Reports
b. Response to Public C:omments [e9timated meeting: minutes*]
October 3. 2006 Studv Session. 6:00 v.m. [due date Monday, Sept 251
l. Advance Agenda Additions - Mayor Wilhite }
2. Council Check-in - Mayor Wilhite } (5 minutes)
3. City Manager Comments - Dave Mercier } TOTAL AZINUTES: minutes
Wednesdav. dctober 4. 2006. Conversation with the Cammunitv, 6-7 p.m.
Valleypoint at Pines Church, Church Sanctuary
October 10, 2006 Regular Meeting, 6:00 n.m. [due date Monday, Oct 2]
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2007 Proposed Budget
2. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
3. Administrative Report: Fee Resolutian - Ken T'hompson
October 12, 2006, AV4'C Regional hteeting. CenterPlace. 2426 N Discoverv Place
October 17. 2006 Studv Session. 6:00 Q.m. [due date Monday, Oct 9]
1. Draft Development Code Regulations, Tides 17, 18, 20 8c 21 - Marina Sukup (150 minutes)
2. Advance Agenda Additions - Mayor Wilhite }
3. Council Check-in - Mayor Wiltrite } (S minutes)
4. City Manager Comments - Dave Mercier } TOTAL MINUTES: 155 minutea
Draft Advanct Agenda 8/10P2006 9:49 AM Pagc 2 of 3
October 24, 2006 Regular Meetin~ 6:00 o.m. [due date Monday, Oct 161
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Hearing on 2007 Proposed Budget
2. Consent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
3. First Reading Ordinance Adoption 2007 Budget [10 minutes]
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Levying Property Tax [10 minutes]
5. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Confirming Excess Property Tax Levy [10 minutes]
6. Proposed Fee Resolution - Ken Thompson [ 15 minutes]
Information Only:
7. Department Reports
8. Response to Public Comments [estimated meeting: 50 minutes*]
October 31. 2006 Studv Session 6:00 a.m. (pnssible no meeting)
November 7, 2006 Studv Session. 6:00 n.m. [due date Monday, Oct 301
November 14, 2006 Regalar Meeting 6:00 a.m. [due date Monday, Nov 6]
1. Consent A enda: Minutes, Claims, Pa roll [5 minutes
2.
OTHER PENDING AIVD/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEFTINGS:
Vacation of Streets: Payment of Value
BOCC Definition of Regional Serviccs
Light Rail
Records management
Lodging Tax
Joint CounciVPlanning Commission Session for Sprague Corridor Subarea: Tucsday, January 16, 2007
Pandemic Rcsponse Strategies - Fire District # 1 Chief Mike Thompson
Prism/PIus/Padal (Parcel Data Locator) System - Chris Berg
Central Valley School District Impact Fee Request
Proposed Sidewalk Ordinance
Sewer Collection Systems - Neil Kersten
SEPA Mitigation Strategies - Cary Driskell/Greg McCormick/Neil Kersten
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Policy Issues - Marina Sukup/Mike Connelly
Dale Stedman, Jerry Lenzi - to report on the Notth/South Freeway
CH2M Hill Valley Corridor EA Amendment - Neil Kersten
Accident Statistics along Broadway - October, 2007
Policing Emphasis Areas Report - Cal Walker
estimated meeting time does not include time for public comments]
Draft Advance Agenda 8110f2006 9:49 AM Page 3 of 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent old business ❑ new business f-I public hearing
0 information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Infornation: Preliminary Chester Creek Digital Floodplain Insurance
Rate Map (DFIRM) Revisions and Flood Insurance Study (FIS).
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC Article IV 10.20.330
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: On July 7, 2006, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
released preliminary DFIRM revisions and the FIS for Chester Creek. FEMA requested
preliminary comrnents on the proposed revisions from affected jurisdictions which include the
City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County and the Washingfon Department of Ecology. These
agencies performed a joint review of the proposal with comments and questions. (See attached)
A Community Meeting has been scheduled for August 16, 2006 at 6:30 pm in the City Council
Chambers. FEMA and their c4nsultants will provide an overview of the National Flood
~Insurance Program and respond to questions concerning the maps and study. Following
c4rrections to the map/study by FEMA, there will be a 90-day appeal period.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only - None required.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Letter to Carl L. Cook, Director of FEMA
S~olane
~ ;OOValley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ S~~~ ~ny
Spokane Valley WA 99206 1026 West Broadway, Spakane, WA 99260-0170
509.921-1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ Phone: 509-477-3600 Fax: 509-477-7478
cityhat(@spokanev,ittey.org
August 4, 2006
Mr. Carl L. Cook, Jr., Director, . Mitigation Division,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 10
130 228'" Street, SW,
Bothell, WA 98201-9796
Dear Mr. Cook: -
On July 28, 2006, the undersigned met to review the preliminary c4mments of agencies
with responsibility for review of the Preliminary Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map
(DFIRM) and Flood Insurance Study (FIS) for Chester Creek. The commentslquestions
of all three agencies have been consolidated and submitted for your review.
~ 1. Discrepanc+es between the technical report, the FIS and the maps.
a. The Technical Report prepared by West Consulting states that there were
"no observed flowsn downstream of the borrow pit (Flood SRorage area
#2), yet the storage capacity is exceeded in the two year event in the
model. Infiltration rates in the borrow pit are one third of the
recommended rate. We understand the reduction was made to allow for
sittation impacts and future changes. This assumption should probably be
made clearer in the FIS. Also, please coordinate the technical report and
the FIS to make sure flows and event probabilities match.
b. Storm flows north of 8"' Avenue approach 4 cfs. We recommend the low
flows be handled most appropriately through a localized stormwater
management program than by the assignment of a 100-year floodplain.
c. Page 22. References not numbered from previous page.
d. The draft FIRM shows 2006 just upstream of AL and still 2006 upstream
of AM. On the profile the BFE at AL is 2006, at AM it measures 2006.1.
The data table shows 2008 at both cross sections. The data table also
shows 2004.5 for AJ, however, on the draft FIRM 2005 is downstream of
AJ. The table also shows 2008 for section AK whereas on the profile it is
2004.9.
e. On page 12 and page 14, 3`d Para. of the FIS, Pines Road should be SR
27.
2. Topography mismatch. Topographical data was derived from several sources.
' Please identify the sources, since it appears that there may be a mismatch.
3. We understand that the delineation of "regulatory° floodways even in reaches
where there is no defined channel is done so that the developer will not have to define it and to also make regulating development in these areas easier. This _
occurs in several locations, both within the Spokane Valley corporate limits and
within the unincorporated area. For example, near section R, the floodway
follows the road and not the low point of the floodplain through an existing
residential development. Please confirm. Should this be explained in the FIS?
4. In areas where the floodplain is confined to the channel in the unincorporated
area, we are concerned that a lack of maintenance could result in flooding
outside the banks of the channel into natural floodplain areas. Was this
considered in the model or is designation of an unnumbered A or "BA zone, for
example, appropriate?
5. Map coRections/symbology.
a. Cross-section Z on the map should be Y at 20' Avenue.
b. Cross section labels are duplicated for different reaches of Chester
Creek. This is very confusing, esRecially when using the profiles in the
FIS. For example on panel 732 east of the railroad, are sections A- D of
the "Dredge Channel" reach which could easily be confused with sections
A- D of Chester Creek at the north end. Consider using unique section
labels for all of Chester Creek study area.
c. The area v+rest of Sands is at a lower elevation and is still connected to
the floodway by a culvert under the road. It has been included in the
floodplain in the past. Please verify that removing this area from the .
floodplain accurately evaluates the risk. ,
d. Where two separate and parallel floodways are identified, the correct cross-section is difficult to identify, particularly on the official map black
and white panels without digital ortho-photos underneath. As an
example, south of 32nd Avenue, cross-sections L and AA are confusing.
Similarly M and AB.
e. The easternmost "Pines Road" should be labeled SR 27 on panel 751.
f. Golf course on Panel 751 is shown as an AE zone- should this not be
designated as AH? (See also comment in G.d. . below)
g. Label all storage areas.
h. Shaded and unshaded "X zones" is confusing. Is unshaded Zone X a
Zone C?
i. Note making the conversion between NAV 29 and NAV 88 should be
included, particularly where the DFIRM and original FIRM are included on
the same panel. Please note that the difference between NAV 29 and
NAV 88 is approximately 3.8 feet.
j. There are no cross-sections east of the railroad between 26th and 32"a
. Avenues. Is this because the area is considered a pond?
6. Flood storage areas.
a. Consider tabulating infiltration & storage assumptions for each storage
area in the FIS. ff infiltration is a factor, these may be different for each of ;
the six flood storage areas identified. If there is no infiltration because the
ground is considered frozen, then the amount of impervious surface is
irrelevant and storage capacity is determined by elevation alone.
b. Implications for development - assuming the latter scenario in 6.a. above,
a compensatory storage provision should be required for any fill. Is this
correct?
c. What are the implications for existing developed area north of 280
Avenue?
d. Designation as "AH" with BFE defined seems to be reasonable, with other
provisions based on the answers to the earlier questions.
7. Floodplain Management vs. Stormwater Management. At what volume should
localized stormwater management replace floodplain management?
8. Modeling issues: The City has not completed its evaluation of the HEC-RAS
runs. Additional comments may be appropriate following this review.
Sincgrely,
Isl ~s1
Marina Sukup, AICP Marianne Barrentine, P.E.,
Spokane Valley Floodplain Administrator Environmental Programs Manager
Community Development Director Spokane County Div. of Engineering
~ and Roads
!sl
Theodore M. Olson, P.E., P.G.,
Washington'Department of Ecology
cc: Dave Mercier, City Manager
Marshall Farnell, CAO Spokane County
Daniel Sokol, State NFIP Coordinator, Washington Dept. of Ecology
Ryan Ike, FEMA Region 10
Mark Riebeau, Lead Regional Management Center Region 10
,
.
i
I
I
f - S06Wa-ne ;
,,;oOValley :
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 0 Spolcane Valley WA 99206
509.925.1000 0 Fax: 509.921.1006 0 ciqfiallespokanevalley.org
I nf~~ 4% ~~'Okna1 tear"310
To: Dave Mercier, City Council From: Neil Kersten, Publtc Works Director
V'
• Steve Worley, Senior Engineer - Capital Projects
CC: Nina Regor, Carolbelle Branch ~
Date: July 31, 2006 Re: Barker Road Bridge Project - Recommended Bridge Closure w/ Detour Route
Background
T.n 2003 the ciiy received a federal Ciridge Replacement grant to replacc the Barker
Road Bcidge over the Spakane Rivcr. At that time the cosE ta replac:.e the bridge was
estunated to be $$,100,000_ The grant pays 100% of this cost. ~ Sxnce then our engineering dcsigu consultant, CH2M HiLL, completed a Typc, Size,
and Locatiou (']"S&L,) Study as required by the graut prograni. As part o£the TS&L
Study CH2IvI HILL updated thc project cost estimale. As reparteci in our monthly
reports, thE revised cost estimate increasEd to $10,226,000 based on. a more detailed
review of the bridgc dcsign avd consfruction elements and on increased material
costs.
A.ccordirig to the Washington State Departiuent of. ?'ransportation (WSDOT), w6o
adm.inisters federally fwnded projects, thc IIridge Replacetnent program pays 100% of
a project's cost up to $10,000,000 (provicted they hawe fuuds available). Tf, pr.oject
costs exceed $10,000,0001 the grant program only covers 80% and the local agency
iuust covez the remaining 20%. Since the revisecl estimate.for ttie Barker Roacl Bridge was only $226,000 over the
S 10,000;000 ehreshold, we are lvoking at ways to keep the tatal projcct cost below
$10,000;000 so it can be paid for 100% witli federal fimcis.
01iginal Cuncept
NVhen CH2Iv1 H:1LI, prepared the TS&L, the original concept was to keep. at least riwo
laiies of traffc open at all times during construction. This requireci the replacement
bridge io be constnictecl iu two stttges:
o Construct one-hali' of the nEw bridge immediately east (upstream) pf the
existi.ng bridge. Maintain traff'ie on the existing bridge.
I
Infonnaiional Memo luly 31, 2006 ~
Barker Road Bridge Project - Bridgc Closure w/ Delour Route Page 2
• After the east hal.f of the new bricige is, eompleted, traffic would be routerd . onto the half-bridge xhile the existi.ng bridgc is demolished and the west balfi '
of the new bridge is constructed.
o Finally, the iwo halves of the bridge deck would be joined by a concrete closure pour, and traffic would he routed to the fi.nal project alignment
Seeattached drawing depicting this stageri approach.
A.lternative Concept -Bridge C(osure w/ Detoar Roate Th dn eff.ort to reduce the total cost oFthe bridge pr.oject, we asked CH2M HTY.T.. to
review potex►tial cost savings by closing the bridge during re-consfruction and
providi.ng a detour route. This woulci give the consfruetion contractor full access to • the bridge site, allowing for a shorter construction period by.not having to deal with
uaffic control issues. Tlus ,vould aiso significandy rcduce tra.ffic control costs during
cansfruction,
Aecord.ing to CH2M HII.L, the poteiitial sa«ngs witli this approach is on tlie order of i
$300,000 to $600,000. See attached letter from CH2IV1 HILL dated May 22, 2006. '
The savinp from thi.s.approach alone would bzi.ng the current estimated bridge cflst beIaw the $10,000;000 threshold for full federal funding.
Potential Economic Impacts of Bridge Closure We are also aware of a sigaificant amount of eommercial truck traffic that uses • $arker Road to access I-90 for the transportation of frciglat If we chose to close the bridge for aQproxi.mately 18 montbs ciuring rz-con.struction, we wanted to determine if there would be an eeonoiUic impact to tlic b-uckiaag inclustry. To fi.nd 1:his out we
contacted a local freight disiribution company and.discussecl f.lie putcntial bridge _
closure issue with them.
According to Matt Ewers, Inland Bmpirc Distribution Systems (IFDS), there would
Rot be an ecanomic i.mppct ta theu compa.ny, ar to other freight aarr.iers and
eransportation companies, if the Barker Road Bridge.were closed. Ot}aer options exist
for tnick access to 1-90; spccifically Harvard K.oad, Sullivan Road, and Argonne .
Road. See attachetl letter &vm TEDS. '
• River Access
One other advantage that a f.ull bridge closure provides is it allows the desi.gri team to
explore the option of moving the sligunent of the new bridge as Far west
(downstream) as the existing Barker Road riglit-of-way allows. Tltis could
' potentially min.imize impacts to the existing access point to the Spok.aue R.iver.
We heard loud nnd clear earlier th,is year that the Barker. Road access point is ane of . the premier i.nputltakeaut points along the Spokanc It.i.ver for the many beginner and
avid caraoellcayak enthusiasts.
Tnformational Memo Ju1y 31, 2006
Barker Road Bridgc Project - Bridge Closure w/ Detour R.oute Page 3
If the alignment of the new bridge were ta be relocated further west, maintaiving
' trarfic on the existing Uridge during consbructian would not be possible siuce
demolitiAn of the existing bridge would be the fiirst stage of consfruction. Concltision
l3ased on tlle uifomiation presented above we have direcied CH2M HI.LL to assume a
fiill bridge closurc (i.e., ttie bridge will not be open for traffic during constn2ction) as
they prepare the design and construction plans. This approach will allow the
consh-uclion contractor f-ull ac;cess to the bridge site, reducc the overall cost of the
replacement bridge, shorten the canstructinn period by approximately 6 months, and
potentially znir,im;-r.e i.mpacts to the Spokaue River access point.
A fiall bridgc closure would require t11e development of a delour plan so aa altemate
raute far trucks ancl local traftiic can be established. 1~Ve will wor.k Hrith CH2M HII..L
to develop th:is detour plan.
«e wi.ll also develnp an extensive public notification process so Uusinesses, local
uesident,s, and the general public wi11 be aware of when and how long the bridge will
be closed.
if you have aiiy concerns or questions regarding this full bridge clasure approach,
please don't besitate to contact eidier Neil or Steve.
:*Y: ' ~C=~n ;;,vl. ~eti•'`.n;-.;,, _ 2~, f~=~? ..";'r.'r, 4S ~'7:.k ~-i: i • - I'~H7`Y'~1~a5 ' - Wtess.~
a.-v~"'1~fiv:1-.•y~i.i~"~Y~G~;;~ ^S;r.` ~i~~.`. , - . 'K~",~~_'~ '
TlS07~ !]2SCIJk ).CwP Oksslv Ji. 1fiW - AGFS+~
i I r l(~ 1~
i •
. ~
:5D
- - ' ~ r..'__-', 1
i i i--- ~ ~'F--• i~l[CN Q
i--
1 I 1 1 . 1 t 1 ~
1 I 1 Y 1 I 1 ~~1
I I 1 i~ 1 I I ~ 1~
.
;
,1
; ~ 1 f ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ o - 't I I A
~
k N ~------1'~ - r[
' t~ ~ l_"__~J ' A, f ~l"'___~ ' •L ~
• f f t n 4. . ' :e. ~ ~
~ E "•o ~ ^p
~o-
~
'i- i
FLJF
' ~ ~ ~ 4 } o~ €
H~Lv
A
Pm
►i` B t ~
0 1I e~
i i.
511 . •O.' ~ ~
'0 Ya :OC:
~ ~ •~iQ~ ~ ~ ~ 49 .
~ .
~ .
` . LZ=>
I~
PRELtMIP1ARY - NQT FOl2 CONSTRUCTiOh!
cnzn HILL
9 Sauth 1ld ashineion
Sulta 4M
~ SpO7ce3n. VJA 392a1 •3709
Wd- (CH29VIHILL . Tel 509.747.2000 x241
~ryg~. • . Faz 509.252-1507
May 22, 2006
332963.FD
Louis Graf Jr, PB/LSIT
Ci+ty of SpAkane Valley
11707 East Sprague Avenuc, .
Suite 106 ' Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Subject: Barker TZoad Bridge Replacement
Dear Louis:
The TSBzL report, prepared recently by CZ12M I-ULL, outlined a proposed concept to replace
the Barker Itoad bridge in a tivo-stage constructicm pr.ocess, which would enable hvo lanes
of Barker Road to remaixi open to traff'ic at all times d uring the construction period. The
iwo-sfiage constructioil plan was proposed to fulfill the City's stated desize to keep the road
~ open ro mi.nimaze'i.r.npacts to traffic. As the pxoject has progressed and estimated project
coSts havE becn fi.uther understood, the City of Spokane Val]ey and the design team are
revisi+ting the costs, bene£its, and disadvantages of staged constnuction tn detenni.ne i.f
roadway closuxe durin~ cons~vction is ~vazxanted.
Currenh project f~unding coztistraints are now driving the need to loak at the lowest cost .
ophions available for coxnpleting the bridge canstruction. Closi.ng the raad during
canstruction and build.izlg the new bridge in one construction stage has a number of
signi~icant advantages that will reduce the overall cost and schedule tv complete the
project. Closing the bridge to txa€fic during the construction period:
o Enables the new bridge aligruxtent fo be shifhed to the west edge of the existing
roadway right-of-way, thereby eliminaf-i.ng the need to acquire a portion of the
Centezutia.l Trail parking lot at the southeast corner of the bridge. This could
facSl.iEafie the project pern-itting pxoeess by redueing the Section 4(f) peamitting -
issues associated with acquiring this park ]and properiy. Avoiding acquisition of
paxk lar►d would aLso eliminatc casts to mitigate, or replace, the park land. Slufting
the bridge aligrun.ient to the west also znaint-ains a straighter eenterline aligninent
khrough the corridor, i.e., reduces the horizontal curve offset dastance shown in
Pigure 1-1 of the T'S&L report. a Hliminates a second mobilization of cxew and equipmeni for cach construction
acNvity. This will save significant time and cast Krith resp2cl to re.mobilization of
specialized cansiruction equipment such as shaft drilling cquipment, d~ck finishing
' ` machines, and earthwork equipment. '
' Louis Graf Jr, PB/LSIT
Page 2
May 22,2000'
, .
332963.FD o Fnables the existiiig bxidgE to be used for in-river access by the contractor, reducing
the total need for and associabed cost of temporary works needed fox construckion
access. ,
e REduces the need for and costs associated with on-going tra.ffic control during
construction o Shorteris the averall construction duration by an anticipated 3 to 6 months, yvluch
wi.ll also reduce the overa.ll bid price by xeducing the contractor's risks of potential
inflation/escalation cost impacb. A shortened construction pexiod tivill also favor
lower construction management and inspectian services costs.
. .._Overall, by closing the road during construction and building.the new br.idge in one stagc,
wc anticipate the ovexall sa-v-ixigs to the project to be on the arder o£ $300,000 to $600,000.
The*City will need to review the acceptahi.lity of prolonged road cl.osure of Barker Road on
traffic opezations. Cu.rrentiy, Baskcr, Road serves as a primary tru.ck roufie far fruck iraffic
corLnecting f.rom I-90 to Trent .Avenue (SR290/53). The overa]1 traffie impacts associated
with tenlporary closure af Barkex Road have n.ot been evalua6ed as part of CH2M FIILL's
scope af work Haxvard Road ar►d Sullivan Road are the nearest aitema#e routes acrass the
Spokane Rivex.
As a precursor to the bridge construction road closuxe,'current construction actiNrities for the .
Barker Road Improvements pro}eet huve BarkEr Road "posted" as cl.osed between Boone Avenue (near I-90) and Euclid Avenue (zlorth of the bridge). However, in rea]ify trafEic is
relativ2ly unimpeded between Boone Avenue and Mission flvenue and vehicles also axe .
able to use the Bazker Road bridge to cross the Spokane River. Regardless, variations of the
exisi-ing road closure are expected to extend through Ju1y 2006, `vhich tivill serve as a rea.l.-
li.fe test case tio pred.ict probable impacts to traffic aperations for a fiill bridge closure
To keep our design work on schedule, we will need a decision on whether #he bridge can be
closed duri.ng the construction period on or before June 19, 2006. In the meanti.mc, please
let us know if you havc any questions or requixe additiional information concerrning this
Sincerely, CF12M HTLL
~
Jim gfieJd, PE Project Managex
, SPK/05222006 L,eiter.doc . .
. .
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
,
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: August 15, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: (:1 consent [l old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
X information admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Lodging Tax Revenues - Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 67.28.150 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Hotel/Motel Tax Advisory Committee will be meeting
soon; and staff wanted to provide a reminder to the Council about some recent developments
relating to what the Washington Sta#e Attorney General has said about what constitutes
appropriate expendifures from the funds collected. The Committee and Council may find the
information helpful in making this year's allocation decisions.
OPTIONS: NIA '
RECOAAMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney; Mike Connelly, City A#tamey
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Copy of Attorney General Opinion AGO 2006 No. 4
2. RCA from March 28, 2006
.
;
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action ,
Meeting Date: March 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: [j consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legistation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Lodging Tax Revenues, Attorney General Opinian
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:RCW 67.28.180
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: As the Council knows, the City receives and then distributes a portion of the
fodging tax collected by the State of Washington. The expenditures by the City for these funds
are proscribed by RCW 67.28, and must be for tourism-related things. The statutes regarding
what can be included in the definition of 'Yourism-related" are somewhat ambiguous, and leave
some room for interpretation. As a resuit, a Washington State senator requested an opinion
from the Attorney General's office based on three questions. I will not repeat the AG's opinion
in this RCA, as the opinion is short and easily understood.
The reason the questions were asked was that some jurisdictions were attempting to get ~
creative in the way they spent their lodging tax funds. When questions were asked by the State
Auditor's Office, responses were somewhat equivocal. This particular Senator chose the
imminently rationale approach of posing the questions to the AG's Office.
The responses provided by the AG are not legally binding, but a reviewing Court would look to
them as a well-informed opinion, and would likely give it substantial weight in coming to a
decision.
It is important to note that the responses to the questions are c4nsistent with the approach
taken by the City of Spokane Valley when confronted with these or similar issues.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACT(ON OR MOTION: N1A
BUQGETIFINANClAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City A#torney; Nrike Connelly, City Attorney
.
ATTACHMENTS; Copy of Attorney General Opinion AGO 2006 No. 4
Authoriiy vf municipality to aliocaie lodgi.na ta.t revenues tt) facilities in wh.ich the fvunic... Page I qf 5
~ ~:~1~i~r~=
_J i:oo hrtciCer.n5 Y.TiOzNE'Y 13ErEstAL cF N.;RSeter•JGi'Oir
LODCCING T'AZ - CT'TIES Ai\`D TCJWNS - COITs\`TiES - TQU-RISibT - PURLIC FUi\'DS -
rl.uthority of municipatify to allacate lodging fax revenucs tc, Taciliiies i.n ivhich the municipalit,y
has no owncrship interest.
.1.. A muzticiPality lacks aiithority to allocate ]pdbing tax re-venue to operate fl tourism-related
facilify in whicb the municipality has no nrvnership interest. .
2. A. munir.ipalify tnay not spentl lotigin,_, tax revenuc on uperating e-xpenses of'special cvcnts and
festi-vals de$ignecl to afh-act tourists where such evcntti ancl festivals are operated by nou-
gavernmental enYities. 3. A munieiPality may not pr•ovide advance payment to private organizatiqns for tourism
proLtiotion; pa3tment mvst uecur after the services have been Uerfornied.
N.4Ci:'~'i: ~S~SL?'Jf{:lL~:j:~'.1~~•'+Y'ttLA.':'CYSS~[YtJij:r^.::i~:~~.'t..:.:y[
~F'ebruary<2;;7(i'OG~%
9:..~.. :
The kIonoruhle Karen Pra,;e.r Washine'tou State Senate CD" P.O. Box _40422 Citc as:
01ympia \VA 98504-0422 aGO 2006 No. 4
]7ear Senator Frase.r: .
. By leLler previaus,ly aclcnow-ledged, you have requesced our opiiiian oii the folloNv-ing que.stioias:
1. 1!Iusf tt mu.nicipalify have an ojvnership inte.rc.st in a tourism-rel,ated facitity in order to ~ellocate ).odgin~ tas rez-enues received under RCW 67.28.180
and .181 for the operarion of'th:3E fourism-i•elated facility? 2. iVtay a municipality spend lodgin ; tax revenue on operating exVenses of
specisl events and festivals clesib ed to atfr:act toii-rists which are opcrateci hy nc►n-
mtin.icipxl e.ntiries? ,
3. Nfay a municipal_ity cnter intu coutracts Nvich fourisni pramuYion agencies
that pruvide advancc payment of botcl-motel tax revcnues for fourist promofion?
' . ~ .
a hF«, 2J14/2006
Authority of mwucipality to allocaLe lodpiug tax revenj-les to facilities iin wh.ich the mun.ic... Paee 2 of 5
. [original page 2j BFtLEF .A~NStiN?FR
jk'e adbcre to oltr coiiclusion in AGO 2000 No. 9 that a unu-Licipality must have an oNvnership ~ i.nierest in tourism-related faciliiies in order to spend lodging taa revenues on the operation of such
facilities. A municipaliiy guay not spend lodging fax revenues on operatiug exPenses of special eve.nts
a.nd fcstivals wlucla are operated by non-municipai entities. Rather, Nuith respect to such events, the
municipaliiy may only spend lodoinia tax revenues on advertising and promotion. A municipality may
uot provide advanee payments of lodEiug tax revenues to service provide.rs. 1'aynie.nt must be n-iade after the fact, supported by appropriate doc.umentation. .
AiNALYSlS
1. 11'Iust a municipality have an owncrship i_nterest in a tourism-relateci
facility in order to allocafe ladging ta:e reve.nues received under RCW 67.28.1$0
and .151 for the operation of thaf tourisni-reiated facility?
Statutorv backc-,round.
RGW 67.25 has evohjed considerably sinee its enactnient in 1967. In its uutia] fiorn, RCW
67.28 simply auChorized Kuig, Counfy to irnpose a lodging Laa for the purpose of funding the
development of stadiam facilities. T aNvs of 1967; Reg. Sess.; ch. 236, § 14. In 1970, this au#hority was
eYtezaded to tl-,e cities of Spokane and Tacoma (La-vvs of 1970, 2nd Ex. Scss., ch. 89, § 1), and then in
] 973 to mUSt Otl]Br nlUlllCjPalitiej (I..aws of 1973, 2nd Ex. Sess., c:h. 34, § 5). :In 1973, the T.egislaturz
also authorized #he developme,nt of convention center facilities (Laws of 1973, 2nd Ex. Sess.; ch. 34, §
1). In 1979, tha Legislature added performi,ng arts centers and visual arts c.e.nters to the list of authorized
facilifiiES (Laws of 1979, lst Fx. Sess., c.h. 222, §5). In 1986, certain counties ancl ci#ies were autliorizEd . to develop tall ships (La,,8-s of 1986, ch. 308, § 1). Tn 1988, cerfain cities and counties «jere authorizecl
to re.f.urbish and operaie stealn rail«jays (Law, of 1988, Fx, Sess.; ch. 1, § 24). .
In adclition to inereasinc, #he number of inunicipal.ities authorii..ed to uiipose the lodging tax ar►d
broadeniniz the array of facilities that municipali#ies were autliorized to develop, tfie Legislature also
authorized certain activities other than the developinent oj faciti4es. Thus, for exarnplE; in 1979, tie
L•egisla.tiu,re e.nacted aLnenciments to 1Z(.W 67.28 tiwluch includcd; arnoii; Qtl1eT 1.Ilii1g5, authoa'i7.,ation for
municipcilities "=to payfor advertising, publiciziug, or otherwise distributing information for the purpose
of attractino vi.silors aild encou.raging tourist espansion tN$en a count}- or city has imposed such tax for
siicli purpose; or as one of the purposes hEreunder" (Law,s of 1979; lsi Ex. Sess_; ch. 222, § 5). Cn 1986;
ccrtain municipalitie: in "distressEd areas" (L-aws of 1986, cli. 308, S l) were autliorized to use Iodjing
4ax revenues "to develop strategies to expaiid towism," which autliority in 1990 ,vas exte.nded to all
municipalii.ies (Laws of 1990; cli. 17, § 1). Fventu2liy-for a tuuie-certain ci4ies «rere authorize_d to
usz lodging tax proceeds- fior funding "special everiLs ox bestivals" (Laws of 1.992, ch. 202, § 1), aud
cicies and cpt.ulFiES Nve.re autl]oriZed; under specified conditious, to pramote "civic festival[s]" (LaNv; of
1.995, cb. 290, § t).
[origifrcil page 31
The 1997 anienduienis to RCW 67,2&
Ln 1997, tlae LegislaitLre enactEd nunierous amendme.nis to RC`V 67.2$. These aniendments
repeaJeti jurisdiction-specific granis of ;zuthority to imposc lodging ta.xes a1id to unciereake tourism-
related activities. The Legislature correspondi.ngly unified the taxinQ Provisions as wcll as the
autiorizing provisions for tourism activifies. "1"he 1997 amendments uicludEd a restatcinent of the '
purposes for which lodging tax recf:ipts rna_y be e.xpeaide.d ai1d, rzlatedly, thc adoption of se.veral key
a 1,+n, 2114/2006
Auiharity of municipality to 3lloca#e lod-in; tax re've1111eS t0 fSCI.I1tIZ5 li] ivYllC}] the II1L1171C... Page 3 of 5
de•in.iziotZS of operativc statutory tenus.
WE liave carefirlly revie-wed the 1997 anendments, as well as the entire legislative histoi}- of the
relevant sectioais of RCW 67.28. Suffice. ft to say t.hat the language of RCtiV 67.28 is far from clear with
respect to a mzuiicipality's authority i;el Mon to spend lodging fa.x receipts on th~e operations of non-
goti-e.rramentally oNvneci facilities. We. acknoxvledgE that rea;onable ai-guments can be made in supporfi of the proposition that municipalities c?o possess sucli authoriry. On the otlie.r hand; as evidenced by r'1G0
2000 No. 9, re.asAnabte argunsents can b_6 made to the contrary. In 'the intervening years si.nce that
opinion ivas issued; the Legislature has not amended RC~V 67.28 in a n-ianncr iliat woulci lead us to alter
the conclusion Nye r.e.ached iu that opinioLi. Thls fact (coLipled Nvith the persisfent inserpretive issues that
RC1V 67.28 has raiised) leads us to conclude that a legislative ameildment to TZCW 6729 expressly
pro«ding authorit}i for municipalities t.o exPend lodging tax receilats on the oPe.rations of non-
govenuuen¢.ally owned faciliiies would be the most e.flicacious and appropriatE manuer by which any
sucli state puUlic palicy decision could be evidenc,ed.
2. 1N'iay a mrinicipaliYy spend lodging tax eevenue an operati.ng expenses of
speci:il events and festivals designed fo artract four•ists w}tich are operatcd hy non-
maniciPal entiiies? .
Tlie legislative lustory Of iI1U111C1p3I 81JtI]OIIIy to fi2ud touristn facilities aud ev-e.nt.s reflects ati
incre-menial; even surgical, approach to polic}, making. .A.s na#ed ahove; in its uutial forrn; TZCW 67.28
si.mply autharized Kina Cnuri#y io ae.velop stadium facilities. Eventually; the Legislaiure authorizcd
. ~
uiunicipalities to p:ovidc tourist inforulataon and t4 iwnd certain kinds of evEnts, in addition co
~ aLithoriziilg the dcvelopment of aNvider 3rray of facilities. Thus, for etaniple; in 19.92 certain cities,,vea•e
aLithoriaed tn use lodeing tax prOCCetIS CQr fi111all1g "special eveaits or festivals ` (Laws of ] 992; eh. 202;
§ 1), and 'ul 1995, ciiies and counties \vexe authorizeci under specified condations to promnte "civic
festival[s]" (L•a-,vs of 1995, ch. 290, § 1). Signiicautly, the 1997 amendments to RC\V 67.28 eluninateci the lanauage that authorized
dircct expenditures of lod?ing tax receipts for special events and festivals. t1s amendeci, the rele".-a.ut langudgc of RCW 67.28 no«r provides that, "All reve.nue frotai taxe•s ['original pa}e 41 iuaposed wnc€er
this ehapter srsall be used solely for the purpose of paying ail or any p:l.t't Of the CASi Of tO1111Sill .
pronZOtion; acquisition of tourism-relared facilities, or operation of tourism-re.lated facilities." RCW
67.28.1815. The only part of tlus language that is arguably releva.nt to the question of expenditLires for
ere.nls or festilrals is tli(,~ reference to "toluism proinotion,." "7`ourism promotiou" is de.ined to mean:
activities aud expenditures designed to uicrease tourism; inclttdin; but not Iimitecl to.
advertisulg, publicizine, or othenvise distrzbuti.ng inforr-nation for the purpose of
atG-actuig and weicomun~ tourists; de~=elopine straeegics to expand tourism; operaiin~
tourism pratnotion agencies; ancl fiauding marketi.ng of special evcnts aiid festivals .
desigcied io attract touTists.
RCW 67.28.080(6) (erupllasis added). The Gcgislature's oNvn lailguage eaplicitl_y restricts evenc and
festi<<al-related expendinares to the "marke.ting" of such activiiies. There is simply no room to interpret
~
tlus laneuage.
-3. May a municipality enter into c.untracts with Courism promotion ngencies
that providc advance.payment of hofel-motel tax reiTenues for tourisf promotion?
'
,_..._.~~.....~,;,,f~....,,-„j,InrininnCl7nnF1I70nF 4_I'ltlTl 2/140-006
Au#horiiy of rnun.icipality to allocate lodging tax revenues !o facilities in which che munic... Page 4 of 5 Your tti.i.rd question asks whether a muiucipality may e•nter into conrracts with tojarism promotion
agencies tllat provide advance payment o:P lodgine tax revenUes for tourist promotion. Your letter refers
to an iliL:fornial advicc memoraiidum fram this o:f:fice, txlucb concluded that such advalice payanenl:s are uot pernuteed. Your letter goes on to observe that; "Wh.ile there is a ueed for accowltabiliiy in
expendihues, this narrow analysis has been used i.n several instauces in spite oi the performance-based •
contracts, procedures in place to assure thai services are jnriginal pcige 5] provided, and the lack of
alternative resources for touri5ui promotion ac#ivities provided to cities and counties; particularly by
expressly-1:'ormed nonprofits."
We reco~nize that the "discribution" and "alloc•ation" of lodgiugtaz proce~ecis to certaa.n non-
prof-it toun'sm promotiou ageucie~s (that is provideci for under RCW 67.28.180) creates the potential .f.ar
confiusjon regarciing tlie application of RCW 42.24.080, to Nvluch your letter refers. Nevenheless, rather
than resting oii a"narrow" readiug ol' RCVJ 42.24.080, we bElieve that the conclusion that advaiice
payments to iourism promotion aaencies is not pennitied follo,,vs ii'oui a siraight-.f.onvard application o€
the plain latiguage of this provision. In pertinen[ part, thi.s provision reads as follows:
U
All clainrJ ] presen'ted against any county, city, district or other mun.icipal corporation
or political subdivision by persons furnishing materials, renderi,ng servic_es or pzrforming
labor, or for ariy otlaer corFtractual pufpose, shall be auditcd, before payn:seiit, by an
auditing offie.er The form sball provide for the autllenticaiion aud certification by such auditing office.r that tlie materials have been firnished, the services rcndered or the
labor performed as described; aaid that the claim is a just, due and unpaid obligation
against tlle municipal corporation 4r political subdivision; azid no claim shull be paicl
)Vithout such autlzenticution und certrfrcation[J .
RCW 42.24.090 (empha.sis added). ,
1l1e above-quoted language by its #eruis is ex-tremely broad, applyi.ng to ?Qy "contractual
purpose." We are ativare of no specifc provision that «rould countermand. RC\V 42.24.080 and thus
m
permit mun,icipalities t4 make advance payments af funds to 1oLiris.m promotaon agencies. Incleed, the Legirlature has made some narrow exceptians #o the general rule against advance payinents, but these
w
exceptioais do not extencl to payments to touris.m promotion agencies.
Cor•igirial pnge bJ C()NCI:;USIO\j
The lQna and ~Nindint road that tlie. Lsgislature has traveled in devclopintly public policy on the
promotion of touzism and the relate.d elpenditures of lodging r3:c rece•ipts lias proLnpted Maity
intcrpretive questions along the way. Indeed; the fact that tlus apinion is the tlurd fornial opin.ion that
tlus office has issued in the past ten years on the subject -af RCW 67.28 evidences tlus uncertainty. Keasonable muids can differ on Fnany of these questious. Neverthel.ess, for the reasous diacussed a.bove,
we adhere to our conclusion in AGQ 2000 No. 9that a mLmicipalaty must have a property i-lrteresi in a
facility that supp4rts tourism or ar-cominodaies toiarist aetivities i.n ordei to spevd locigina taY receipts on
tlie operations of such a facility. We also coiiclude that muiucipalities are not authorizcd to spend
lodging taY receipts to fund spec,ial cvents or fcstivals. Finally, we concltrde thal' municipalities may not
make advance payment.s fo the prov.iders of tourism-relaced scrviczs. We tnLst tlle fore ;oing will p.rave useful to you. 1,,+„~/A.n,..., QfR xz,n nr,.71nn;,,znnQ1?nn6nno6 4 i,r,,, 2f1412006
Autliorily ofmutiicipality to aUocate lodbina tax reve:nues to facilities in ~vhich t11e niunic... Page• 5 of 5
Sincerely; .
~
;
ROB MCl~~ti~'A
Attorney General
R013LRT J. FALLIS
Assistant Attorney Geiieral
:pmd
I`~..I In 1979: the Legislature euacted amendnieuts io RCW 67.28; wvich included, amon~ oti~er thines, authorizacion
for municipalities "to pay, for 3d<<ertisine, publie.izino, or othenvise distribu#ing infonnaiion for che purpo;e of attracfing
visitors and encouraeing tourist expansion when a county or cih, has imposed such tt3x for such purpose, pr as one af the
purposes hereunder". Laws of 1979, lst Ex. Sess.: ch. 222, §5.
U
See Staie v. Costich, 152 \Vn2d 463, 470, 98 P.3d 795 (2004) (where Ianguage is unambiguous; court gives
effect to that lanauage alone; I,egislature is qresurneci t.o say whzt itmeans aud mesn whatis says). In Ar_rQ 1995 No.iO, this
office discussed tht meaning of thc. then-existing statutory+ lan;uage that auchorized Ipd'inb VaX eXnendittLres for "advertising,
publicizing; or othenvise distrihuring informatioi.i for ihe ptaipose of atrractin-, visitors and encoura.-ing tourist expansion" and for "develop[ingJ strateoirs ta expand tourism". AG0 1995 No. 10, at 2. AGU 1995 No. lU concltided, u} part, that the
above latlguage could alot be read to autliorize municipalities to fiind special events and festivals; othenvise, the thcn-exisiing
prUVisos which the opinian found to authorize expenditures for suc}i events and festivals would be redundant. AGO 1995
No. 10, at 5. The 1997 amendments to RCNV 67.28 retained substantially inract, in the defin.ition of ~tourism prpmotion," tlie
above-referenced language. As noted above, h4wever, no provisos or pther huouage authorizing direci eapendilures for
~ special events or festivals were inclucled in the 1997 arnendments. T'his seems to have bee-n uriderstood by others at the time,
as well. See 14.13. R.e.p. on Substitute S.B. 5867, SSt}i Leg., Rcg. Sess. (Wash. 1997), a: 5 (summar), of "testimony for"
amendmeaits to RCW 67.25 indicates ihat amendruenU "Nvilt 11e1p communities fund promotion activities for festivals and
other events."). See also ln re Iiale, 63 Wn.2d 83, 89, 385 P.2d 545 (1963) (Leeislature is presumed familiar wit'b own prior
legis(ation; "(I)n cAnsiruuiE statutes whicb re-enaci, witti ctrcain changes, OP I'epea! OtheP StatuLCS, or which cpntain re<<ision.s
[io earlier laws], resort to repealed and stipe.rsecled stahztes may be had, and is of ereat imnoriance in ascertaining ihe
intention of the Legislature, for,- wliere a a►atQrial chanee is mude in the wording of a statvte, a chan,e in leeislative purpose
must bc presuined.") (citations ocnitted); .Stute v. Roggerrkcrm,p, 153 1Vn.2d 414, 624, 106 P3d 196 ( 2405) (drafiers of
lEgislation are }.~restnnrd to have ust,cl no superfluuus words, and courts rnust accorti tneaning, if pussible, to e.ven, word)
• (citations omitted). . ~
"Clairos" is not defiiled in StaLltte. 'l'hus, it is to be givcn irs ardinary meanin~. Dictionaries are. an appropriate
saiirce for dt.lermuiing that mezning. Dcri~is v. Dep't ofEmpl. Sec., lOR Wn.2d 272, 737 p2d 1262 (.1937). "Claim" meins
to ask for especialty as a righr, to take as the rightfu) owner, or to assert in the face of possible contradictiAn. Merriam-
l3'ebster OnLine Diclionary found at http_lhvw,,v.m-w.comJdic6onay (V1SIt2(l I3rillaT}+ 26, 2006).
L~ .
Your letter reSers to ce.rtain [ypes of contractual proteciions tvhir.h you su-gcst render unnecessary a prohibition
on acivance pa}rtents. At leas# up to'the presene, the Legislature ha,s noi founcl tbese types of convaetual proiections to tie
unconsisEent with, or a substitute far, a pqlicy agautst advance paymf.nts to contractors. State agenciQS are oenerally
prahibited fram mak-ivg advance payments to cqntraclors despite the state`s coiisistent usc of a battery of strone contr3ctuai
protections in favor of its agencies. See RCW 43.33.160(5) (prohihiting advance payPnents to eontractors except fvr ccrtavn
maintenance agrceinents anci subscription services).
- r5l ~
See R6V 4224.035 (providivg an exception ca ttie usual prohibition on advance payments Uy public agencies
and municipal corporations for paymenu for publicaiions and periodieal subscriptions that are rrEade "in a manner as
eonsistent as possible and practicable with narrnal and usual business methods, Fend in the case of subscriptions; for periods
not in excess of three yeus").
, 1,++.,.11..n1rtzr :,}U ,va onv/nnininns/2006/2006 4.him 2/14/2006