The URL can be used to link to this page

2006, 11-28 Regular Meeting ANIF,.NDED AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Mceting #105 Tuesday, November 28, 2006 6:00 p.m. CITY HALT,., AT REDWOOD PLAZA 11.707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor Council Requests All Electronic Devices be Turned Off During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten, Valley Assembly of God PLH.I:)GE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: "PROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON StJNti1'IARY RFPO:ItTS: MAYOR'S RF..PORT: I IJRL IC COMMTNTS: Except where indicated below for "public comment" this is an opportunity for the public to speak on any topic. When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. UN-II'LOYFF RECOGNITION: Dave Mercier 1. PIJBIJC ftEARING: Proposed Amended 2006 Budget-Ken Thompson 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Following Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER fis TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT 11/06/2006 10364 $5.950.56 11/13/2006 10413 $44.963.81 11/20/2006 10420 -10472 $189;77237 GRAND TOTAL $240.686.74 b. Payroll for Period Ending November 15, 2006: $161,162.46 c. Minutes of November 14; 2006 Council Regular'Mecting NEW BUSINESS 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-027 Amending Right-of-way Permit Process - Morgan Kolldelka [public comment] 4. First Rcading Proposed Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget - Ken Thompson (public comment] Council Agenda 11-28-06 Regular Meeting Page I of 2 5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-029 Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code 2.50 Personnel Policies -Nina Regor [public comment] 6. Proposed Resolution 06-024 Master Fee Schedule - Ken Thompson [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS Except where indicated above for "public comment" this is an opportunity for the public to speak on any tropic. When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. A )MINiSTRATTVE REPORTS: 7. North Spokane Corridor (US 395) Update - Jerry Lenzi, Dept of Transportation 3. Cable Television Public Access Concept.: COmmunityy-Minded TV - Dan Baumgarten 9. Lodging Tax Advisor Committee Grant Recommendations - Deputy Mayor Taylor 9a Urbwui Growth Areas Defined - Scott Kuhta INFORMATION ONLY: 10. Department Reports EXLCUTME SESSION: 1 entling Litigation AMOURMMENT FUTURE SCHEDULE Regular Council Meetings are generally helrl2nd and 4rh Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Cottneil Study Sessions are generally held.1". 3"t and 5th Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Other Tentative Upcoming Meetings/Events: Thursday, November 30, 2006: Community Workshop #3; Interactive Transportation. 6-9 p.m. Decades Banquet Facility, 10502 F Sprague Avenue NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require: special assistance to accommodate physical, hearinr~, or other iitlpairmeiits, please C011IFlet the City Clerk at (5 09) 92 1-1 000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 11-28-06 Regular Meeting Page 2 of '2 f AGENDA SPOK-XN : VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING Council Meeting #105 Tuesday, November 28. 2006 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL AT REDWOOD PLAZA 11707 East Spmgue Avenue, First Floor Council Requests All Electronic Devices be Turned Off During Council Meeting CALL. TO ORDER- INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hutton. Valley A3semhly of trod PLEDGE OF ALLEGl NCF: ROLL CAi.L: APPROVAL OF AGEND:t: INTRODUCTION OF SPEC IAI. GUTS" TS AND PRE.SLNTATIONS: COMMI TF.F„ BOARD, LIAISON StItTNtARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: Vxcept %vhere indicated helm for "public comment" thi.; is an opportunity for the public to speak on any topic. When you comp to (lie podiutrt, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: Dave Mcmivr 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2406 Budget - Ken Thompson 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considcmd routine which arc approved as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. it. Followinu Claim Vouchers: VOUCI fI'.R LIST DATE VOUCI11,11 #s TUTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT - 1 11/06/21006 10364 55.950.56 I 1/ t 3/?006 10413 541.963.81 I 120f?006 10,120 - 10472 $189,772.37 GRAND TOTAL 5-40,686.7.1 b_ Payroll fUr Period Ending November 15, 2006: S 161.162.46 c. ;Minutes 4 November 14, 2006 Council Regular itleeting NEW BUSIN`E5S 3. Sccand Rcading Propowd Ordinance 06-027 Amending Right-of-way Pcrmit Process - lklorgan Kaudelka (public commentJ+ '1. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget - Ken Thompson (public comment) Firm Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-1)21) :Amending SpokariL 4',rllt ~ '~luntciPal ! ade ' ;,t Persotmel Policies - Nina Regor (public comment( 0 Proposcd Re~solutiun 06-024 M-icter Fcc Schedule - Kcn -1 homr,son (public commend IT111 l(' ('ON1NILN l 11.,r public commullt"'k;t< :n (,l•In Vt:1 11% t'!r the public to speak on any topic. Wien you "011111- t„ Iltc pOdturrt, p1t:.t;c >t,tlr ;.,-ur n.uitc md .t,)dre i 11_,r the rc::ord and lirnil rctt xk-, to there minutc,. A1)N11NlS'1'tt1'l'l%'F: WTOR-IS: North Spokanc Corridor (US 395) l-'p,iat_ fern Lc'nr.t. 11ept of rr tn!'pL'rtrtti,_!rt 8. Cable Television Public Access Concept: Conuttunity-Minded TV - Dan Baunt__~tr n U l o;l;;inc T:+x 1d%-;';or-Y ['ommittre grant Recommendmions - i?eliu - Ma%or L'.\ I. r IN1, 0R01ATION ONZ_l : If) peltartrtlcnt Itcp,Vrtz FAF(UTINT SFS.IzI()N- Pending t-itig:ttiott fF-l.'T(:RF, SCIIEDU E Regular Council !lieetings are generaH►' held 2nd and 4"' Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m Council Studv Ses ionr are generally held 1", 3'f and Sib Tursdavs, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Other Tentative Upetyning, 3fcNings 'T►'cnc►: Mursdav, November 30, .'.006: Community \~'url slt,l}~ ~.t, lnter.t ►i%e Tralvq•~)ratinn t>-4 p.m ih..rdc~ Ran,luct F.wilit.., 1050` I. ',-pr.tgue Menuc ` i i 11 . hid a III-d,=•,•1;111 ~trtr,,, il~ 1 1-. ,I I!: i:i r : F!, r.nt iu 1,' 01c t. .i. 1,i 1 l + , I I'• ''tut -trrangment+ r ,,.L !r `tcc tie., ue: ; , November 27. 2006 Please use this draft of Ordinance 06-028 as the i,Lnumentation for (ucNda-, 's public hearing and Jor aLenda item #4. T he differences are highlighted. (no change to Exhibit 14) %-t 111%." OR .,.u..- - SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDUNANCE NO. 06-028 AN ORDINANCE, AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 06-014 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 13, 2006 AND ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON," WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 05- 029, THE. ADOPTED BUDGET FOR THE. PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2006 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2006, APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND ESTABLISIUING SALARY SCREDULFS FOR ESTABLISHED POSITIONS." WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the 2006 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform various City functions, services and activities; WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the annual budget was passed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the best. interests of the City arc served by amending the adopted budget to reflect anticipated revenue, expenditures, fund balances, and appropriating same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley. Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues. Ordinance No. 06-014, as adopted or amended, adopted a budget for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and fund is hereby amended as follows. A. General Fund of the 2006 budget is amended to include an additional 51,300,000 in unrestricted carryover fund balance from 2005. Sales Tax receipts are increased $722,000 for a total increase in general fund revenues of $2,022,000. l3. CD Block (.;rant Fund revenue-, are increased by $2,000 for a contribution from the General Fund. C. Interest incc»ne in the Street Fund is increased S45,000 representing additional interest generated by a greater than estimated fund balance and increasing interest rates. D. Grant proceeds for flashing school warning signals increases the Street Fund revenue by $24,000. E. Grant proceeds and unrestricted fund balance provide revenue for two full width pavement projects in the Stormwater Fund. For purposes of these budget amendments, hxhibit *'A " is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. Ord.nancc 06.028 Arnrnuing 2006 Budget Rage I of 3 DRU~ I' REVENUES: FUND FUND JUNE 2906 AMENDED ENDING) NUMBER NAME BUDGETED REVENUES AMENDMENTS REVENUES 001 GENERAL $ 32,410,641 $ 2,022,000 $ 34.432,611 101 STREET $ 4,166.856 $ 69,000 $ 4,235,85 102 ARTERIAL ST $ 568,655 $ - $ 568,65: 103 TRAILSIPATHS $ 23,053 S $ 23,053 105 HOTELIMOTEL $ 400,667 $ - $ 400,667 204 DEBT SERVICE $ 600,000 $ - $ 600,000 301 CAPITAL PROJ. $ 1,210,000 $ - S 1.210,000 302 SPEC. CAP. PRJ $ 1,070,713 $ - $ 1,070,713 303 STREET CAP PRJ $ 8.385,843 S - $ 8,385,843 304 MIRABEAU PT $ 783,205 $ - $ 783,205 305 STREET BOND PRJ $ 1,202,460 $ $ 1,202,460 306 COM DEV BLK GRNT $ - $ 2.000 S 2,0a3 307 CAP. GRANTS S 8,211,000 $ - $ 8,211.000 308 BARKER BRDGE FED $ 890,400 $ - $ 890.400 309 PARKS CAP. PRJ $ 1,300,000 S - $ 1,300,000 310 CIVIC BUILDING $ 1,100,000 $ - $ 1,100,000 120 CENTERPLACE OP. $ 300,000 $ - S 300.000 121 SERVICE LEV. STAB S 1,000,000 S - $ 1,000,000 122 WINTER WEATHER $ 500,000 S - $ 500,000 402 STORMWATER S 1,621,534 $ 89,000 $ 1,710,534 501 EQUIP REPL & RES $ 693,257 $ - $ 693,25% 507 RISK MGMT $ 189,939 $ - $ 189.9' TOTALS $ 66,628,223 $ 2,182,000 S 68,810,223 Section 2. Expenditures Appropriated. To appropriate the amendments from the above estimated revenues and unrestricted beginning fund balances for each separate fund, the expenditure appropriations for the period January I throLigh Decemhcr 11. 2006 arc anlended as et forth hcluv, LXPL•N1)I { 1 ~lZESr;1PP1ZtI{'kl:'1-I-It)1~ti~ FUND FUND JUNE 200T AM L- N UL L) NUMBER NAME APPROPRIATIONS AMENDMENTS APPROPR,', 001 GENERAL S 32,410.641 $ 2.022.000 S 34.432,62 101 STREET S 4,168.858 S 69,000 $ 4,235,85-. 102 ARTERIAL ST. S 568,555 $ - $ 588'c1-'-; 103 TRAILSIPATHS $ 23,053 $ - S 23.03 i 105 HOTELIMOTEL $ 400.687 $ $ 400,667 204 DEBT SERVICE $ 600.000 $ $ 6w'0100 301 CAPITAL PROJ. $ 1,210.000 S S 1.210,000 302 SPEC. CAP. PRJ $ 1,070.713 S $ 1.070,713 303 STREET CAP PRJ $ 8.385.843 $ - $ 8,385.843 304 MIRABEAU PT $ 783,205 $ $ 783,205 305 STREET BOND PRJ $ 1,202.460 S - $ 1,202,460 306 COM DEV BILK GRNT $ $ 2,000 $ 2,000 307 CAP. GRANTS $ 8,211.000 S - $ 8,211,000 308 BARKER BRDGE FED S 890,400 $ $ 890.40-) 309 PARKS CAP, PRJ $ 1.300,000 $ - $ 1,300.00) 310 CIVIC FACILITIES S 1,100,000 $ - S 1,100,0f:O 120 CENTERPLACE OP. $ 300,000 S $ 300.0•: 121 SERVICE LEV. STAB 3 1,000.000 $ $ 1,000.0; 122 WINTER WEATHER S 500,000 $ - $ 500,00- 402 STORMWATER S 1,621,534 S 89.000 $ 1,710.53.3 501 EQUIP REPL & RES $ 693.257 $ - $ 693.2-7 502 RISK MGMT $ 189,939 S - $ 189.-g--. -j TOTALS $ 86.629.223 S 2.182,000 S 68.810.223 t )rdinance 06-028 Amending 2(X)6 Hudget Pasc 2 ul 3 DRAFT These amendments include a transfer from the General Fund to the Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund of $1,500,000; a $400,000 addition to the sheriffs contracts for settle and adjust costs occurring in the General Fund; a $2,000 increase in the CD Block Grant Fund for interest on an inter-fund loan: a $45,000 increase in appropriations in the Street Fund to update street construction standards as approved by the city council on October 10, 2006; a $50,000 increase in appropriations for remaining 2006 costs of the SpragueJAppleway Corridor Revitalization Plan study; $70,000 in payments to the Library District for delinquent taxes related to the 2005 property tax levy; S24,000 for Street fund flashing school warning lights; and $89,000 for full width pavement of two Stormwater Fund projects. Section 3. Positions. The Cite of Spokane Valley's number of full-time equivalent positions is 63.8. ,Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall he in full force arid etTect five 0) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed b}r the City Council of the Cit, of Spokane Valley this dav of 2006. A"I`I EST: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to firm: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordin;uicc Cof _[_Cx Arricndtne 201,116 [1ud,; t Page 3 o 3 City of Spokane Valley Exhibit A Amendments to 2008 Budget Nov-06 REVENUE EXPENDITURE Fund INCREASE INCREASE ExpIana;inn GENERAL - - Unrestricted fund balance S 1,30Q`_'o.--~ Transfer to Civic Facilities Fund Sales tax $ 722,000 $ - Ineresee to current a timato Planning subarea study for 06 $ 50.000 To rn«ew to oa propCWDelinquent tax for library s 70,000 Per contf.a wM W"ry di3' Transfer to Com. Dev. Block Grant $ 2,000 to -.:,r rear Public Safety Contracts $ 400,000 General Fund Totals $ 2,022 000 S 2,022.000 Community Dev. Block Grant General fund contibution S 2,000 7ra;Ver from Gen F. nd Interest expense $ 2,000 fn?emat cn ntarfund Iran Street fnterest income S 45,000 l'o update street construction Professional services 5 5.000 sand irds as aFpr:ved :0 10 06 Flashing schonl s'.gnal grart 5 24 000 Stone tttlfster Block grant Full paving of sewer project S 50,000 *lock gent prolo-_< Unrestricted fund balance $ 39.100 Omhnrd rult wlmr. oo•, r,., ._t Full paving-Orchard sewer line $ 39,000 sewer nrarocr train zco5 GRAND TOTALS-> S 2,182,000 S 2.182.000 1,7 l CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business © public hearing information ❑ administrative report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing - Proposed Amended 2006 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State law requires a public hearing and an amendment to our budget when the City will exceed appropriations (budget). Previous Council Action Taken: The City budget for 2006 was adopted in November 2005. Several amendments were authorized by the city council in May of this year. BACKGROUND: Additional budget adjustments are needed to: 1) transfer $1,500,000 to the Civic Facilities Fund for future facilities; 2) adjust revenue sources by to anticipated levels; 3) update the budget for potential settle/adjust costs of $400,000 for the sheriff contract; 4) include interest costs of $2,000 for a loan to the Community Development Block Grant Fund; 5) appropriate $50,000 for the remaining 2006 projected costs of the Eco-Northwest Sprague/Appleway Corridor Revitalization Plan; 6) appropriate $70,000 for the payments to the library district for delinquent taxes collected from property owners pursuant to contract; 7) appropriate $45,000 for the development of city-wide street standards; and 8) budget $24,000 for flashing school signals which became available via a' grant. A more detailed listing of the proposed budget amendments is attached as Exhibit A. OPTIONS: Options include holding the hearing on November 28 or holding the hearing at a later date. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff recommends holding the hearing on November 28, to maintain our budget amendment schedule. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Additional / new revenue has been identified to pay for these amendments to the 2006 budget. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director Jason Faulkner, Accountant/Budget Analyst City of Spokane Valley Exhibit A Amendments to 2006 Budget November 2006 REVENUE EXPENDITURE Fund INCREASE INCREASE Explanation GENERAL Unrestricted fund balance $ 1,300,000 Transfer to Civic Facilities Fund $ 1,500,000 Set S aside forcl*- facilities Sales tax $ 722,000 $ - Incioaso to currontostimotc Planning study for 2006 $ 50,000 To Increase to 2046 projected casts. Delinquent tax for library $ 70,000 Poi contract with library distrVel. Transfer to Com. Dev. Block Grant $ 2,000 To pay interest on loan. Public Safety Contracts $ 400,000 Pay settle and adjust costs. General Fund Totals $ 2,022,000 $ 2,022,000 Community Dev. Block Grant General fund contibution $ 2,000 Transfer from General Fund Interest expense $ 2,000 Interost on intorfund loan Street Interest income S 45,000 To update street construction Professional services $ 45,000 standards as approved 10-10-06 Flashing school signal grant S 24,000 $ 24,000 Flashing signal lights GRAND TOTALS---> S 2.093.000 $ 2,093,000 :Budgetamendx 11-14-06 attach A CITY OF SI'O1CAN'E VALLEY SPOKANE.. COUNTY, WASHINCI'ON ORDINANC NO. 06-028 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORINANCE NO. 06-014 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. ON TUNE 13, 2006 AND ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON," WHICH AMENDED ORDINANCE NO. 05-029, THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR Tff PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2006 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2006, APPROPRIAI`ENG FUNDS AND ESTABLISHING SALARY SCRE-DULES (Exhibit B) FOR ESTABLISHED 1'OSITIONS." WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the 2006 annual budget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments, and transferring funds in order to properly perform various City functions, services and activities; WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the annual budget was passed by the City Council; and I WH-E-IZ.EAS, the City Council has determined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the adopted budget to reflect anticipated revenue, expenditures, fund balances, and appropriating same as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain as follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues. Ordinance No. 06-014, as adopted or amended, adopted a budget for the twelve months ending December 31, 2006. 1:ach item, revenue, appropriation, and fund is hereby amended as follows. A. General Fund of the 2006 budget is amended to include an additional S1,300,000 in unrestricted carryover fund balance from 2005. Sales Tax receipts are increased $722,000 for a total increase in general fund revenues of $2,022,000. B. CCU Block Grant Fund revenues are increased by $2,000 for a contribution from the General Fund. C. Interest income in the Street Fund is increased $45,000 representing additional interest generated by a greater than estimated fund balance and increasing interest rates. D, Grant proceeds for flashing school warning signals increases the Street Fund revenue by $24,000. Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget Page I of 4 For purposes of these budget amendments, Exhibit "A" is attached hereto and incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. i REVENUES: FUND FUND JUNE 2006 AMENDED ENDING NUMBER NAME BUDGETED REVENUES AMENDMENTS REVENUES 001 GENERAL $ 32,410,641 $ 2,022,000 $ 34,432,641 101 STREET $ 4,166,856 S 69,000 S 4,235,856 102 ARTERIAL ST. $ 568,655 $ - $ 568,655 103 TRAILSIPATHS $ 23,053 $ - $ 23,053 105 HOTEUMOTEL $ 400,667 $ - $ 400,667 204 DEBT SERVICE S 600,000 S - $ 600,000 301 CAPITAL PROJ. $ 1,210,000 S - $ 1,210,000 302 SPEC. CAP. PRJ $ 1,070,713 $ - $ 1,070,713 303 STREET CAP PRJ $ 8,385,843 $ - $ 8,385,843 304 MIRABEAU PT $ 783,205 $ - $ 783,205 305 STREET BOND PRJ S 1,202,460 $ - $ 1,202,460 306 COM DEV BLK GRNT S - S 2,000 $ 2,000 307 CAP. GRANTS $ 8,211,000 $ - $ 8,211,000 308 BARKER BRDGE FED $ 890,400 $ - $ 890,400 309 PARKS CAP. PRJ $ 1,300,000 $ - S 1,300,000 310 CIVIC BUILDING $ 1,100,000 $ - $ 1,i00,000 120 CENTERPLACE OP. $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 121 SERVICE LEV. STAB S 1,000,000 S - $ 1,000,000 122 WINTER WEATHER $ 500,000 S - $ 500,000 402 STORMWATER $ 1,621,534 $ - S 1,621,534 501 EQUIP REPL & RES $ 693,257 $ - S 693,257 502 RISK MGMT $ 189,939 $ - $ 189,939 TOTALS S 66,628,223 S 2,093,000 $ 68,721,223 Section 2. Expenditures Appropriated. To appropriate the amendments from the above estimated revenues and unrestricted beginning fund balances for each separate fund, the Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget Page 2 of 4 i expenditure appropriations for the period January l through December 31, 2006 are amended as set forth below. EXPE-NID1TURES/APPRO.PRIATTONS: FUND FUND JUNE 2006 AMENDED TOTAL NUMBER NAME APPROPRIATIONS AMENDMENTS APPROPRIATIONS 001 GENERAL S 32,410,641 $ 2,022,000 $ 34,432,641 101 STREET $ 4,166.856 $ 69,000 $ 4,235,855 102 ARTERIAL Sr. $ 568,655 $ - $ 568,655 103 TRAILS/PATHS $ 23,053 $ - $ 23,053 105 HOTEUMOTEL $ 400,667 $ - $ 400,667 204 DEBT SERVICE $ 600,000 $ - $ 600,000 301 CAPITAL PROD. $ 1,210,000 S - $ 1.210,000 302 SPEC. CAP. PRJ S 1,070,713 S - S 1,070,713 303 STREET CAP PRJ S 8,385,843 S - S 8,385,843 304 MIRABEAU PT $ 783,205 S - $ 783,205 305 STREET BOND PRJ S 1,202,460 $ - $ 1,202,460 306 COM DEV BLK GRNT S - $ 2,000 $ 2,000 307 CAP. GRANTS $ 8,211,000 $ - $ 8,211,000 308 BARKER BRDGE FED $ 890,400 $ - $ 890,400 309 PARKS CAP. PRJ $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 1,300,000 310 CIVIC FACILITIES $ 1100,000 $ - S 1,100,000 120 CENTERPLACE OP. $ 300,000 S - S 300,000 121 SERVICE LEV. STAB $ 1,000,000 S - S 1,000,000 122 WINTER WEATHER $ 500,000 S - $ 500,000 402 STORMWATER $ 1,621,534 $ - $ 1,621,534 501 EQUIP REPL & RES S 693,257 $ - $ 693,257 j 502 RISK MGMT S 189,939 $ $ 189,939 TOTALS $ 66,628,223 $ 2,093,000 $ 68,721,223 These amendments include it transfer from the General Fund to the Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund of $1,500,000; a $400,000 addition to the sheriffs contracts for settle and adjust costs occurring in the General Fund; a $2,000 increase in the CD Block Grant Fund for interest on an inter-fund loan; a $45,000 increase in appropriations in the Street Fund to update street construction standards as approved by the city council on October 10, 2006; a $50,000 increase in appropriations for remaining 2006 costs of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Revitalization Plan study; S70,000 in payments to the Library District for delinquent taxes related to the 2005 property tax levy; and S24,000 for Street Fund flashing school warning lights. Section 3. Positions. The City of Spokane Valley's number of full-time equivalent positions is 63.8 with salary ranges as shown in Exhibit B. Section 4. Severabi I ity. if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this _ day of December, 2006 Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget Page 3 of 4 • I ATTEST: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO MINI: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Date of Publication: Ordinance Ordinance 06-02$ Amending 2006 Budget Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Exhibit B 2006 Budget Salaries Effective 711612006 Position Title Grade 2006 Range Ci Manager Unclassified De u Ci Manager 21 $ 7 441 - S9,540 Ci Attorney 21 7,441 - 9,540 Community Development Director 21 7,441 - 9,540 Finance Director 21 7,441 - 9,540 Public Works Director 21 7.441 - 9,540 Parks and Recreation Director 19 6,027 - 7,727 Planning Manager 18 5,425 - 6,955 Building Official 18 5,425 - 6,955 Senior Engineer - Caoital Projects, Development 18 5,425 6,955 Deputy City Attorney 18 5,425 6.955 Senior En ineer - Traffic CIP Plannin [Grants 17 4,882 - 6,259 Accountin Mana er 17 4,882 6,259 City, Clerk 16 4,394 5,633 Engineer 16 4,394 5,633 Senior Plans Examiner 16 4,394 - 5.633 Senior Planner 16 4,394 - 5,633 Associate Planner 15 3,955 - 5,070 Assistant En ineer 15 3,955 - 5,070 Public Works Superintendent 15 3,955 - 5,070 ITSpecialist 15 3,955 - 5,070 CenteiPlace Coordinator 15 3.955 - 5,070 Human Resource Analyst 14 3.559 4,563 Accountant[Budaet Analyst 14 3,559 4,563 AdministratKre Analyst 14 3,559 - 4,563 Assistant Planner 14 3,559 - 4,563 Buildin Inspector II 14 3,559 - 4,563 Plans Examiner 14 3.559 - 4,563 Public Infomsation Officer 14 3,559 4,563 Engineering Technician 14 3,559 - 4,563 Senior Permit Specialist 14 3,559 - 4,563 Maintenance[Gonstruclion Inspector 13-14 3,203 - 4,563 Recreation Coordinator 13-14 3,203 - 4,563 Cade Enforcement Officer 13 3.203 - 4,106 Building Inspector 1 13 3,203 - 4,106 Planning Technician 13 3,203 - 4,106 De u City Clerk 12-13 2 883 - 4,106 Senior Center Specialist 12-13 2,883 - 4,106 Administrative Assistant 11-12 2.595 - 3,696 Permit Specialist 11-12 2,595 3,696 Accounting Technician 11-12 2,595 - 3,696 Maintenance Worker 11-12 2 595 3,696 Office Assistant II 10-11 2,335 - 3,326 Office Assistant 1 9-10 2 102 - 2,993 Recreation Assistant 5 1 323 - 1,735 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 11-28-06 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: BACKGROUND: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER 4s TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT DATE 11-06-06 10364 $5,950.56 11-13-06 10413 $44,963.81 11-20-06 10420 -10472 $189,772.37 GRANTD TOTAL $240,686.74 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Jason Faulkner ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List page. 1 1110612006 2:4 :25PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor ITIV01ce PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 10364 111612006 OUQU28 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANE{ 1162006-3 CC.Z045-0EVLEMING'a CARD 232.59 1162006-4 CC-5169 ILWE'S CARD 152.04 1162006-5 CC 507d MUNSON'S CARD 100.00 1162006-6 QC-5060 TAYLOR'S CARD 666.90 1162006x7 CC 1637- TFIOMPSON'S CARD 340.95 1162fla6-8 CC 1217-MERCIER'S CARD 157.84 1162QQ5-g CC 1852-GENERAL CARD 1,867.57 1172D06 CC-125 1, 54}9.75 1172006-2 CC-IM 753.93 Total : 5,954-56 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 5,854-5$ 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 5,950-56 APPROVED-K , L--Z~ //-77 I, the undersigned. do certify under penalty of perjury. I~.eri Thompson, Finance bireetor I}s:tte that the rnaterfals have peen furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as clowieed harcln and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid abligation x } against the City of Spokane Valtey. a nd that 18 m authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim- Mayor Wilhite Finance f3ire4#or Date - - - ~'Q1113CJ1mPrnh~r _ Page_ 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11/1312006 1:35:25PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10413 11113/2006 001139 CATS EYE EXCAVATING, INC. 110 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 2,029.62 111 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 9,109.92 112 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 3,579.19 113 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 4,470.02' 114 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 2,748.51 115 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 758.94 116 41323 CONTRACT NO 0&022 CATS EYE 1 3,350.32 117 41323 CONTRACT NO 06.022 CATS EYE 1 4,356.86- 118 41323 CONTRACT NO OS-022 CATS EYE 1 3,859.87./ 119 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 2,993.76 120 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 3,082.97- 121 41323 CONTRACT NO 06.022 CATS EYE 1 4,419.12 128 41323 CONTRACT NO 06-022 CATS EYE 1 204.71 Total : 44,963.81 1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 44,963.81 1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 44,963.81 APPROVED: I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, e / `/r ! " J D that the materials have been fumished, the servioss Ken Thompson, Finance Director Date rendered, or the labor performed as described herein _ and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am . C"'; t authortzed to authenticate and certify to said claim. MA3'Or w1ll1HtC Y Finance Director Date r ' le 0111 001, e Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 11120/2006 10:03:22AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10420 11/20/2006 001181 ACOSTA, CARRIE 11132006 REIMBURSEMENT 21.90 Total : 21.90 10421 11/20/2005 000150 ALLIED FIRE & SECURITY svc280121 SERVICES FOR REKEYING OFFICE 66.36 Total : 66.36 10422 11120/2006 000335 ALTON'S TIRE INC. 6-19528 99 JEEP CHEROKEE 117.91 Total : 117.91 10423 1112012006 000905 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, PI 11172006 APA CHAPTER DUES 497.00 Total : 497.00 10424 11/20/2006 000030 AVI STA UTILITIES 11152006 BILLING DATE 11/1/2006 20, 976.84 Total : 20,976.84 10425 11/2012006 000168 B & C TELEPHONE INC. 123644 UPDATING PHONE NUMBERS 97.74 123666 UPDATES FOR PHONES AT CITY H 613.60 Total: 711.34 10426 11/20/2006 000841 BCI CREATIVE INC. 7808 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 75.00 Total : 75.00 10427 11/2012006 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY, INC. 8765462 LINEN SERVICE AT CENTERPLACE 322.01 8767360 LINEN SERVICE FOR CENTERPLAC 318.36 8769253 LINEN SUPPLY FOR CENTERPLACI 213.80 Total : 854.17 10428 1112012006 000907 BUILDING MAINTENANCE SUPPLY 37393 41333 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 114.89 Total : 114.89 -iX429--,-.Jaf2(fi W5_G6a E-PUBMFI1NC,GOMPAIVl''~--2724 EBZTSiIN 80'80' diI~IC-FPPR'ECOII 2:89` VV.LIlI. V,t, vZ(.4, k/ol a)-)e1 Total : 463.49 } G✓ t 10430 11/2012006 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 45004 r~hC COFFEE ORDER FOR CENTERPLA 91.34 Total : 91.34 Page: 1 ~ I vchlist Voui nar List = 2 11/2012006 10:03:22AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10431 11/20/2006 001148 COLUMBIA PAINT & COATINGS 98047/D 41367 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 211.67 Total : 211.67 10432 11/20/2006 000987 ECOLAB 0684403 41399 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 127.71 Tota I : 127.71 10433 11/20/2006 000858 FOOD EQUIPMENT INTL, INC. 4844 41336 OPERATING SUPPLIES 65538 Total : 655.38 10434 1112012006 001183 GALLU710, BEN 11162006 REFUND REQUEST 235.50 Total : 235.50 10435 11/20/2006 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC. 991 MONTHLY LEASE PAYMENT 201.97 992 MONTHLY LEASE PAYMENT 233.49 993 MONTHLY LEASE PAYMENT 307.84 994 MONTHLY LEASE PAYMENT 412.68 Total : 1,155.48 10436 11/20/2006 001182 HENDERSON, VALERIE 11162006 PERMIT REFUND 80.00 Total : 80.00 10437 11/2012006 001185 HICKS, ROGER 11162006 REFUND REQUEST 10.00 Total : 10.00 10438 11/20/2006 000441 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL CREDIT 1192006 STATEMENT BILLING 182.76 Total : 182.76 10439 11/2012006 000632 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 06-5219813 ICC DUES 180.00 Total : 180.00 10440 11/2012006 000265 JACKSON, MIKE 11172006 REIMBURSEMENT 10.00 Total : 10.00 10441 11/20/2006 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC. 28317 ADVERTISING 124.20 28327 ADVERTISING 30.80 28330 ADVERTISING 78.00 28331 ADVERTISING 65.25 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 3 11120/2006 10:03:22AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank- Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10441 11120/2006 000117 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING INC. (Continued) Total : 298.25 10442 11/2012006 000033 MCPC, INC. 5010766 41385 DG- OFFICE SUPPLIES BUILDING C 566.69 Total : 566.69 10443 11/20/2006 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY 11172006 BILLING DATES 10117-2512006 3,747.06 1192006 BILLING DATE 10/30/06 98.08 1192005-2 BILLING DATE 10130/06 607.40 1192006-3 BILLING DATE 10130/06 86.15 Total : 4,538.69 10444 11/2012006 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC 11152006 DECEMBER RENT 27,182.58 Total : 27,182.58 10445 1112012006 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 343016769-001 OFFICE SUPPLIES 71.20 359092067-001 41368 OFFICE SUPPLIES 402.67 359485984-001 41372 OFFICE DEPOT 73.98 360141345-001 41381 OFFICE SUPPLIES FOR FINANCE 105.54 360693628-001 41386 DG- OFFICE SUPPLIES 245.63 41386 360694067-001 41386 DG- OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.01 Total : 984.03 10445 11/2012006 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE TREASURER 11132006 OCTOBER SERVICES 57,947.63 Total : 57,947.63 10447 11/20/2006 000512 OFFICETEAM 17114643 SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAP 181.50 17189962 SERVICES FOR KIMBERLY WILLIAP 635.25 17199585 SERVICES FOR CATHERINE ROSM 604.80 Total : 1,421.55 10448 11120/2006 000899 ONEEIGHTY NETWORKS 545599 SERVICE FOR CITY HALL & CENTE 828.18 Total : 828.18 10449 11/2012006 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERV INC. 17,574 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 1,105.60 17,764 SERVICES FOR CENTERPLACE 1,105.60 Total : 2,211.20 Page: 3 vchlist Voucher List rage: 4 1112012006 10:03:22AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount 10450 11/20/2006 001161 PROVISIONAL STAFFING SERVICES 3008-0500013766 SERVICES FOR MATT KUSHNER 920.88 Total : 920.88 10451 11/20/2006 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS, INC. 17571 41388 VEHICLE LOGOS 184.62 Total : 184.62 10452 11120/2006 000341 RICOH CORPORATION 06121598227 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 412.68 6121597950 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 246.53 6121612865 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 238.92 Total : 898.13 10453 11/20/2006 001186 SCHOONOVER, KIM 11172006 REFUND REQUEST 24.00 Total : 24.00 10454 11/2012006 001184 SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION 11162006 REFUND REQUEST 75.00 Total : 75.00 10455 11120/2006 000726 SHUR KLEEN SERVICES, INC. 65922 41350 JANITORIAL - CARPET CLEANING 300.00 Total : 300.00 10456 11/20/2006 000090 SPOKANE COUNTY INFORMATION, SYS 61207 - AUGUST BILLING 13,664.78 Total : 13,664.78 10457 11/20/2006 000499 SPOKANE COUNTY LIBRARY DIST. 1182006 PROPERTY TAX PORTION FOR LIB 8,290.00 Total : 8,290.00 10458 11/20/2006 000308 SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTING, ATl 11132006 CRIME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 862.84 Total : 862.84 10459 11/2012006 000323 SPOKANE COUNTY UTILITIES 11162006 BILLING DATE 11/1/2006 682.55 1192006 BILLING DATE 11/1/2006 781.95 Total : 1,464.50 10460 11/20/2006 000324 SPOKANE COUNTY WATER DIST. #3 11172006 BILLING DATE 11/10/06 6.75 1117200&2 BILLING DATE 11/10106 192.98 Total : 199.73 10461 11/20/2006 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB 10/31/06 OCTOBER BILLING 10,399.00 Page: 4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 5 11/2012006 10:03:22AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount 10461 11/2012006 000406 000406 SPOKANE REGIONAL CVB (Continued) Total : 10,399.00 10462 11/20/2006 000084 STANDARD REGISTER 5216913 41382 PAYROLL/PAYABLES CHECK STOC 736.75 Total : 736.75 10463 11/2012006 000419 SUMMIT LAW GROUP 32122 GENERAL EMPLOYMENT & LABOR 22.00 Total : 22.00 10464 1112012006 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW INC. 11172006 BILLING DATE 10/31108 64.97 Total : 64.97 10465 11/20/2006 001160 TOWER ELECTRICAL SERVICES 0020725-in 41358 EXTENSION OF NETWORK BACKB+ 4,550.06 0020726-in 41359 DATA CABLING OF SUITE B3 4,326.62 0020727-in 41358 EXTENSION OF NETWORK BACKBI 123.18 0020728-in NEW PRODUCTS FOR BUILDING S 233.69 020724-in 41360 ISOLATED GROUND RECEPTICLE 1 399.65 Total : 9,633.20 10466 11120/2006 000102 TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO 20271322 SERVICES PROVIDED 217.20 Total : 217.20 10467 11/2012006 000646 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, NEOPOST POST 11152006 WIRE TRANSFER AUTHORIZATION 3,010.00 Total : 3,010.00 10468 11/20/2006 001077 V.H. SERVICES, INC. 6561 199 JEEP CHEROKEE 46.10 Total : 46.10 10469 11/20/2006 000167 VERA WATER $ POWER 11172006 BILLING DATES 1111-1012006 568.10 Total : 568.10 10470 11/20/2006 000129 WRPA 06-627 DUES 621.00 Total : 621.00 10471 11120/2006 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS, INC., FILE 5055C 0211382789 PHONE LINE SERVICE 1,577.03 Total : 1,577.03 10472 11/2012006 000766 YMCA OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST 10102006 SEPTEMBER 2006 BILLING 13,175.00 Total : 13,175.00 Page: 5 vchlist Vole List 6 1112012006 ~'!US:22AM Spoh.:,,:.::!alley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO Description/Account Amount 63 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 189,772.37 63 Vouchers In this report Total vouchers : 189,772.37 APPROVED: I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been fumished, the services Ken Thompson, Finance Director Date rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the Cfty of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Mayor WilWte Finance Director Date oun mem er Page: 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 11-28-06 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending November 15, 2006 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: ! OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Gross: $145,174.10 Benefits: $ 15,988.36 TOTAL PAYROLL: $161,162.46 STAFF CONTACT: Jason Faulkner ATTACHMENTS DRAFT AUN UTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, November 14, 2006 Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the 104th meeting. Attendance: Citystaff.• Diana Wilhite, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager Steve Taylor, Deputy Mayor Nina Re-or, Deputy City Manager Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney Dick Denenny, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Director Bill Got:hmann, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Rich Munson, Councilmember Marina Sukup, Community Development Director Cal Walker, Police Chief Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer Greg Bingaman, IT Specialist Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk M-L IOCATTON: Pastor Chuck Wilkes of Spokane Valley Nazarene Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor Wilhite led the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously agreed to opprove the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECTAL GIIFSTS AND PRESENTATIONS: None. COA"UTTEE, BOARD. LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Depu Mayor Taylor:, reported that last week he and the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee met and heard presentations from the applicants for the Hotel/Motel grants; that the committee met to discuss the allocations; and this will be reported fully at the next council meeting Councilmember Gothmann: stated that he attended the Appleway Open House on the improvement of the east part of Appleway, and he complimented staff on their fine work. Councilmember Munson: said that attended the recent Spokane Transit Authority Operations and Administrative Committee meeting; and that this morning he went to University Elementary and read a book to some of the fourth graders. Councilmember DeVlemin~: explained that the 911 Board continues to work to research a way to bring back Crime Check in some format; that they examined the volume of past calls where it was discovered that two out of three calls did not result in a report generated; that the crime reporting center staff is doing a survey to try to find out what are the calls that are not generating reports; and that he also attended the SCAPA Board meeting where they are working on some solutions that might help in the rendering plant. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Wilhite reported that she attended the Appleway open house; she met with members of both Chambers of Commerce to discuss legislative agenda items including our proposed Universal Park; she attended a ground breaking ceremony for Intermountain Bank in front of Costco; and she attended a housing seminar about the homeless and associated county-wide housing problems. Mayor Council Meeting: 11-14-06 Page 1 of5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Wilhite then read the two proclamations: Youth Leadership Month; and ?National Hunger and Homeless Awareness Week; with Amber Jackson and Nick Piger accepting the proclamation on behalf of the Youth Leadership Program; and Sheila Morley of Spokane Valley Community Center accepting the ?National Hunger and Homeless Awareness Week proclamation. PUBLIC COIN01E °TS: Mayor Wilhite invited public comments, no comments were offered. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Following Claim Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER #s TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT 10-16-2006 1016640169 10177 133,954.40 10-19-2006 10176, 10178-10244 298,783.95 10-26-2006 10245-10302 212,981.08 11-02-2006 10303, 10313-10362 1,927,111.84 GRAND TOTAL 22572,831.27 b. Payroll for Period Ending October 31, 2006: $225,662.02 c. Minutes of October 24, 2006 Regular Council Meeting d. Minutes of November 7, 2006 Council Study Session Meeting It was moved by Deputy ilAiyor Taylor, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSI TESS 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-024 Adoptin, 2007 Budget - Ken Thompson After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Gothmonn and seconded, to adopt Ordinance 06-024 adopting the 2007 Budget. Finance Director Thompson mentioned that Council held several public hearings; and that this budget ordinance includes an increase in the outside agency funding, and sines the first reading, adds $21,000 as a place holder for the GiS Site Locator program; and concerning street fiord expenditures, as Council previously decided to go with the option that would postpone the deficit in that fund until 2010, an adjustment to the ordinance reflects that option. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Councilmember Munson explained that he struggled with how to vote on this; that when the representative from SCRAPS previously gave a presentation to Council, Councilmember Munson said he made it clear he did not want an increase to the SCRAPS contract; that this budget indicates an $11,000 increase. However, he continued, there is the hope that the contract price will go down to 2006 levels based on the 2006 experience of adjusting contracts; and that SCRAPS representatives said they had a number of issues they would try to accomplish that would reduce our contribution and make this more of a "pay as you go" operation. City Manager Mercier reported that this morning's discussion between the Board of County Commissioners and representatives from the City of Spokane concerning this issue lasted for approximately 90 minutes; that cost estimates suggest that if a regional program were to assume responsibility for animal control, it would require an annual operating budget of $1.3 million and likely construction of an additional animal shelter of approximately $3.5 million; that the County Commissioners discussed a variety of ways to change the funding to the community, and that fee increased proposals are making their way to the Commissioners; it was also noted that in examining fees around the area, no one charges less than $10.00 a day for boarding; but SCRAPS charges $6.00. Mr. Mercier continued to explain that an ordinance is moving forward whereby they look to fashion some uniform licensing fee and allow jurisdictions to apply some surcharge; adding that there was also talk Council Meeting: 11-14-06 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT about trying to convert the animal control program to an enterprise account, and that enterprise amounts must be self-funding. Councilmember Munson concluded by stating that he anticipates bringing the animal control issue forward to Council in February to re-evaluate our position and make a decision about going our own way if necessary. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: !lone. .Abstentions: Alone. Motion carried. 3. First Reading proposed Ordinance 06-027 Amending Right-Of-Way Permit Process - Mo[ Koudelka After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded, to suspend the rules and adopt ordinance 06-027. Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that staff previously presented a draft ordinance to Council along with a fee structure; that Council requested extending the duration of right-of-way activities exempt from permitting requirements, from one hour to two hours; that although this draft provides that requested time extension, staff would like to further revise the ordinance definitions as it was discovered that some of the current definitions are outdated. With that information in mind, Deputy Mayor Taylor withdrew his motion; and made a new motion, seconded by Councilmember DeVleming, to advance ordinance 06-027 to a second reading. Mayor Wilhite invited public comments. Tim Mair of Spokane Avista Utilities: thanked Council for being allowed to be part of this committee and thanked Mr. Koudelka for providing the updates of this process; said that when the fee schedule is ready, he would like to review that also. Mayor Wilhite invited further public comments; no further comments were offered. Mr. Koudelka said the plan is to implement the new fee schedule with the upcoming Master Fee Schedule to be effective January 1, 2007. Council then briefly discussed frequent right-of-way users. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: none. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Deputy Mayor Regor asked, and Council confirmed that an explanation of the new definitions will be part of the second reading rather than a separate agenda item. 4. Proaosed Resolution 06-022. Repealiny- and Replacing Rules of Procedure. Governance Manual - Councihnember DeVleming It was proved by Councilmember .DeVleming acrd seconded to approve Resolution 06-022. Councilmember DeVleming gave a brief overview of the process, a few procedural reminders, and the proposed changes. Deputy Mayor Taylor suggested deleting the second sentence of 3.03(g) as he feels it unnecessary as members of the public are interested in all the council activities, and that it is not appropriate to dictate what should be in a report. It ivas moved by Deputy Mayor ..Taylor Fund seconded by Councilnrernber A,1wnson, to amend the resolution by striking the second sentence under 3.030. Discussion in opposition to the motion included the reason for the agenda item to relay what councilmembers are doing in their councilmember position. Vote to amend the agenda:.Tn Fcn o•: Deputy Mayor 74ylor• and Councilmember iVf nnson; Opposed: Adayor Wilhite and Councilmembers Denenrny, Schirrnnels, Gothrnann, and DeHein ing. Abstenntions: Alone. Motion fails. Vote on the original motion to approve Resolution 06-022: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. .Abstentions: None. Motion carried. The Resolution is approved as submitted. 5 FroUosed Resolution 06-023 Establishing Three Revised School Speed "Zones -A?eil Kersten it was moved by Deputy A46yor Taylor and seconded, to approve resolution 06-023 establishing three revised school speed zones; establishing a new school speed zone; and revising tlvo school speed zone signs. Public Works Director Kersten explained the proposal as per his November 14, 2006 Request for Council Action. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by .Acclamation: In Fervor: Unanimous. -Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. 11,6tion carried. 6 Motion Consideration: Geiger Agreement- Morgan Koudelka It was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and .seconded, to authorize the City Manager or designee to execute the Interlocal Agreement for Geiger Confinement, Work Creiv, and Work Release Services in the Council Meeting: 11-14-06 Page 3 of5 Approved by Council: DRA 7 City of Spok-ane Valley. Administrative Analyst Koudelka explained that the agreement has been re- _ worked in the model agreement format; that the agreement will use the "settle and adjust" style dividing the estimate costs into twelve equal payments that will be paid each month and reconciled to actual costs after year-end. Mr. Koudelka added that rates have been adjusted to recover all costs of the current year; that an operating loan from the County to cover a deficit was factored into the current year rates which led to a substantial increase in rates, but that the rates for 2007 will be lower than the rates for 2006. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclarnation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: Krone. Abstentions: _None. Motion carried. 7 Motion Consideration: Professional Services A zreement- Lobbyist - Dave Mercier It was moved by Deputy Mayor Taylor and seconded to authorize the City Manager or designee to negotiate and finalize a professional services contract uruler the City Manager's purchasing authority. City Manager Mercier explained that this is a two-part agenda item, with the first addressing items to be advanced on behalf of the City during the upcoming session of the Washington State Legislature; and the second part to address the prospective city lobbyist. Regarding the lobbyist position, Mr. Mercier explained that $40,000 was allocated in the budget for that position, that two proposals were submitted within that budget amount, and that staff is working on final revisions of the contract language and anticipates having a the firm on board shortly. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. Brief Council discussion included that this is a one year contract and will be re-visited again next year; that those legislative issues of council concern were incorporated into the scope of service, and the agreement gives the lobbyist direction to promote the interests of the City. Mr. Mercier added that he expects weekly contact from the lobbyist to be alerted to breaking issues. Vote by acclamation: In Favor.: Unanimous. Opposed: Axone. Abstentions: llrone. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENTS Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. A,DN NISTRATIVF REPORTS: g Proposed Fee Resolution - Ken Thompson Finance Director Thompson explained the draft fee resolution and the changes proposed as mentioned in his accompanying Request for Council Action. After CounciUstaff discussion, staff will further research why there is a different fee for the short plat; the exact meaning of "valuation exceptions" and will further elaborate on the meaning of "based on value of project minimum $3,000," as shown on page 12 and in other places in the fee resolution. Mr. Thompson mentioned that this item is scheduled for resolution approval at the November 28 meeting. 9 Snow Plowing & Street Sweeping Level of Service -Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten explained that several weeks ago, staff discussed a Request for proposals for street sweeping, and it was mentioned at that time that Council desired to discuss levels of service for street sweeping and snow plowing. Mr. Kersten then went through his PowerPoint presentation explaining those levels of service, the priorities, the 2006107 Operations Plan, and the costs spent for 2004, 2005 and to date in 2006. Mayor Wilhite remarked that she had received mixed reactions from members of the community where some people were happy to see their streets plowed where they had not been done in the past, while others were not happy about having their driveway plowed in; and she voiced a suggestion of perhaps raising the level of snow before plowing, to five inches. Mr. Kersten explained that the plowing is a judgment call; it depends on the amount of snow and the weather forecast, as if the weather forecast is warmer, they won't plow. Mr. Kersten also discussed the new granular de-icer product that they previously used on Pines and Trent, that it works well in a lower-temperature, and not only melts the ice but breaks down the snow. In addition, use of that product will result in less sweeping as the need for sanding would be less. Council Meeting: 11-14-06 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Further discussion included unusual weather conditions were the exception rather than the rule; use of discretion on plowing priority 4 areas, no specific limits on plowing neighborhoods with no hills; only plow areas that need plowing; berms and plowing of major intersections. After further discussion, City Attorney Mike Connelly suggested having a written policy, and Council concurred that staff should craft the policy as appropriate. Concerning the levels of service on sweeping; Mr. Kersten said they are at a minimum, bare-bones level as that is all there are funds for; and while there are no specific requirements to keep in line with the Clean Air Act, the goal is to keep areas clean and that is done by sweeping once in spring and once in fall; and that staff tries to hit all areas in the spring to clean up the greater amount of sand and dirt. It was determined there would be no change in the sweeping procedure. 10 Apple wav Reconstruction Project - Steve Worlcv/Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten discussed the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project; and explained how the project ended up almost twice as expensive as initially thought, as the road was in much poorer condition than originally thought. After counciUstaff discussion, it was council consensus to split the project into two projects and to use STP funds from the Valley Corridor project to cover the Appleway reconstruction Project's shortfall. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Land Acquisition; Pending Litigation. It was moved by Counciltnenrber Munson, seconded and unanimously passed to adjourn into executive session to consider the acquisition of real estate, to review the performance of an employee, grid to discuss ►vith legal council potential litigation pursuant to RCW 42.30. 1 10(b)(b)(g) and (i); that the estimated time is 90 minutes; and there may be action related to the acquisition of real estate when we re- convene into regular session. Mayor Wilhite announced there would be a ten minute recess prior to convening into executive session; and council adjourned at 8:05 p.m. for that recess and subsequent executive session. At 9:34 p.m. Mayor Wilhite declared Council out of Executive Session. It was moved by Councilntember Munson, seconded, and unanimously passed that the Mayor send a letter to the Spokane County Commissioners requesting that they immediately acknowledge the City of Spokane Yalley's right to ownership of the Appleway corridor from east of University to the City limits. There being no further business, it was »toved by Deputy Mayor Taylor, seconded and unanimously passed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. Diana Wilhite, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Mceting: 11-14-06 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old businm ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ Information ❑admin. report 2) pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-027 Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 10.05.070, 10.05.080, 10.05.090, 1.0.05.100, 10.05.110, 10.05.130, 10.05.140 and 10.05.180 Relating to Obstruction Permits. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code; Chapter 10.05 Article II. Construction Work and Activity within Right-of-Way. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance 63-03; April 11, 2006 - Administrative Report; June 18, 2006 - Presentation of Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations; August 15, 2006 - Presentation of Staff Recommendation; October 3, 2006 - Administrative Report ROW Permit Update; November le, 2006 - First Reading of Proposed Ordinance 06-027. BACKGROUND: On April 11, 2006 Staff presented a report to Council that examined the City's current Right-of-Way (ROW) process and compared it to the process of other Washington cities. On August 15, 2006, staff presented different ROW permitting options available to the City and provided a staff recommendation. Staff brought forward a draft ordinance and fee structure based on the staff recommendation on October 3, 2006. Council requested extending, from one hour to two hours, the duration of right-of-way (ROW) activities that are exempt from permitting requirements. This draft ordinance provides that requested extension of time. This change was made in conjunction with requiring that all ROW activities that close more than 50% of any non-arterial roadway or close any lane on an arterial roadway require a permit regardless of duration. This second reading included edited definitions for "Director", "Easement", "Right-of-Way", as well as the elimination of the definition for "Street", the addition of the definition for "Roadway", and the elimination of the word "obstruction". OPTIONS: Continue implementation of the current Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 10.05 Article II, approve the attached draft ordinance to amend the SVMC, or provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION. OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 06-027. BUDGET/ FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Fees will recover costs at current staffing levels. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka Administrative Analyst, Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 06-027 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASIUNGTON, AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 10.05.0711, 10.05.080, 10.05.090, 10.115.100 10.05.110, 10.05.130. 10.05.140 AND 10.05.180 RELATING TO 081-411 C110NRIGIfr-OF-WAY PERMITS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance 03-063, providing requirements for ~>trt+ctt~permits for certain activity in the public rights-of-w-ay. Ordinance 03-063 %~as later codified into Spokane Valley Municipal Clxle 10.05.070-10.05210; and WHEREAS, the City desires, from time to time, to analyze the effectiveness and appropriateness of its code requirements ter determine if they can be impro~cd I IC1it ,to - and WHEREAS, amending; SVh1C. lu i iJ. 10.05.080, 10.05.040.- 1 1•n 10.05.110, 1() O-; I J0. 10.05,140 and 10.05.180 will further the public health, safety and welfare. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as follows: sectica 1. Intent- It is the intent of the City Council for the City of Spokane Valley to amend SVMC 10,o (170. 10.05.080. 10.05.0w, 10:01l10.05.110, 10.05.111), 10.05.140 and 10.05.180 relating to right-ut_ %~ajut^tfitwEion-permits to make compliance with requirements easier for frequent users of the City's rights-of-wa> without compromising the health and safet% of its citi. cns or the conifition of the Cir'. 'nf1 ~strurttue. Section I. Amending 5,po.:arw ~'.rll-.\ Rlllnitin.ll C'Nit- '.('ttr,)t1 1(1(14il' I Formu"ed: Nits NiAdi 4.4r SVMC 10,05.070 is amended as tolls . 10.05.070 Dctuuhons, _"Right-of-way" or "puhlic way" means all property in which the City has awy form of ownership or title, inclutlinz ease.mrnts. and which is held for public tttetaiadµas or utility purposes, regardless of whether or not any titrtrtr k% or utility exists thereon or whether it is used, improved or maintained for public use "Director" means the city' manager or de-Siplee .atttt:• - -I- FonRatted: Tab,s: N+x at 4 4 'Easementu means ~►r:t.: -___.t~-~~.--l,.~t,j.:. --ttlr,-~ ~ ~ ~_-,~t _r •_t r~-_:; benefittinst the Cit% ktyer the property of anuti "Roadway" means the paved, imprt-, t_-- II k, rI t;I i'. ; _ r1 7 t_.r .feel within the City desiened- or ordinarily used for'.chiculur ors.. I n it. ,t-lY-.t:tt} -ii4l,-,-::4^ttt:-. i Section 23, Amending Spokane_ Vallcv Municipal Code scrtiun 10.05.080: SVMC 10.05.080 is amended as follows: 10.05.080 i +j---,.-,!t ;.,•q . Permit Required Unless exempt from Nrmit requirements. Aa+y permit is required of any person j)r cYxnjTanv who performs construction work or otherwise engages in activity within existing tw-tf:~. -City rights-of--way. ewiefi 4 or on City owned infrastructure. Pcrmi(% shall not he_rrquired-filr the ti~llowing A- Work done by or for the City within its rights-of-way- -04 Rf3t-fOt~tttfi :::t-. t--:{•lt'TN.ir~w.t::.fi :.t7 +~i1/: ~11.:.n:..71tt~-.iT'!1[~_,.:•h^:_ ~r B_ Aori,, that l" tw%t hour; or less; itl :luritwn. ai loci work dots not require closure of more ffian 59n oSa ngnwart Al EVgd% . does not close anv lanes on an arterial madwav, does not inyt k excavation within the right-of-way, or does r,.-t _inso1_:__.,t? placement ofpayement, sidewalks, curbs or g-utte! Exemption from the Miit requirements of this c, _d I ;,,_t_! Lo cratnt Authorization for any work to be done in any manner in %iolili wn OfthcprC1yi$iv 4 rat 1~1i; o dt.'_!r_.111 .rthsrr_!:au•::,~fi~!1~:111iC'} {[r `••'an•.1 ~irl`:..! this JUI.1SC1tCtIft1? - - - - - - - In the case of an cITIergcnc), a prlyate or public utility may conimence work prior to obtaining a permit, provided the person obtains a comstruction permit within 48 hours after work is commenced or on the first City business day following said elapsed 48-hour period. Obstruction Permits issued between April I and September 30 are valid for 30 days after the date of issuance. with a ore-time 30 day extension available. Obsttvction Permits issued between October I and March 31 shall be valid until the following April 30, Section 34. Amending SpK)ka ne Valley Municipal Code section 1( 05,OQO( SVMC 10.05,090 is amended as follows: (s1;<sr+_-Ki}it-~l•++a~ Pctmit-Application. No ell ; , t_ ,+•a%c*strti 4ton permit shall be issued unless a written application is submitted and approved by the Director. The application shall, at a minimum, contain the following: A. Construction plans or drawings approved by the Director. if required; B. A lraflic cuntral_pt:ui_if the Hurl closes more than 501. of the non-arterial roadwaS, or closes w % lanes on an arterial steetroad++aN•; C'13. The period of time during which the right-of-way will be obstructed. and _ fonw.ttied: Jwbflted, I„ dmt: First CD. Proof of the contractor's and all subcontractom' state licensing. insurance and requirements. [,-pending upon the nature and extent of the construction activity or work, the Director may require engineering, restoration and drainage plans prepared by a Washington licensed engineer at applicant's sole cost and expense. \t tht: tf„cleliwl t,t the i?i1_ err, s titulti~^Ir < Pe mit_ tir;l_, fur Iiectiscd and lwnded busing ses and public utilities I'lhc Multiple-1 I 'e fix will be established by resolution in_tlte_! t LYce . •hcdulL• rsr ,ft-myllipppit-Usa Permit shall expire at the end of the City I,',% The administrative rreulatiottynveming the Multiple-lase Permit shall %Titten and ApM%-±d ht the Dirrc7or. Failure to comf,l+ ti+itirtl r administnti+e rr~!ulation_s ya11 a ~ iolation of [his cajr_ lion S. Amc-Dine S one Valley Municipal Code section 10.05.100: S V MC 10.05. f 00 is amended as fol lows: It Ricltt u(++ati pcrntit fees. ~,1~.={• _ri.tK!'•._,,; permit fee's shall be adopted by resolution of the city council. Section 46, Amending Spokane Valley Municipal C'txlc c_cction 10.05.110: SVMC 10.05,110 is amended as follows: Notice Required. The applicant shall give to the Director notice not less than forty-eight (48) hours before any work or activity is commcn "--d and shall notify the Director upon completion of the same: If a trafftc conuill ('I~ln CC'.itilTitl 1~ I~t' !IhI'!I'(;,t '.~I!h i31C :!(~i1(=t; It ~1t, fi)~• aj~"?~ll.lfll '-ila~~ [4•I l=4,. rlI v _ _Ilour In the event of xi1 uno-,peeled rrpa[r or cmcrgency, work may be commenced as required undLr the circumstanct-s. UncxpmtLd repairs and ernergency work shall comply with all othir roquircmcnts of this Ord4ianckr- 1005 11 rS Spa \I Ili I7j5 I .I J Ll U', Iu4'l~,tit In the event it is neressmy for the perrnittee [a excavate the entire width of the tier ;r_~I_arl_}~.g v no more ttyan half of the -4tee! rAQLl%ka% shall be e pencti for constn ctiun and closet) to traffic at one time. Such portion of the work- shall be backftlled and oompleted Mare the remaining portion of the -4feet-,oaa_'•%, =y be excavated.. If it is impossible, infewible or unsafc to permit the work while maintaining an open lane for traffic, the director may, with the cQncurrcucc with I.he chief of police and fire chief, permit the °-iis`s`.4 Twgkf e 7 - to ho lrlnckcd ror a short period of tinke whm, suitable detours can be provided and the public will not be utytiecc-Sarily inconvenienced- Tltr permittee shall furnish facilities, such as bridges. or otheT suitable means, or ct=ly identify appropriate detours, to allow the flow of traffic -A ithout unrimessary corrbc-~;lion- +4 tang_ N Amending Spaskane Valley Municipal Co4o tip 10-05-WO. SVMC 10-05.140 is wnend-ed as fella ws-L Trai3ic Control. Pemiiite AnN vrmin or cemrlan% That ~•,~mt~hrta4.i~rn ti,~r~: ~rthea^sra4ti cat~~uc-~ yt7 z,t_ti~ity xM hit) the e~,,istiaTl~l ril±t~1 Ors-a~ 9'. Lvr on ± i1,. ownr d infra tra,ttl~r, is responsible f6ralltraffi,: mntrol tiTTd assumes the reiponsilrility to maintain appropriate signage, signals and barricades that p~3tects the public safely, in accordance tvilli the NILITCD. P-mirti;i-eellic y .fi-tsij (-•r shall provide rear the :safe operation of all equipment, vehicles and persons within the right-nF way- %reeflon 0, r'lmend.ing Spokane Vallcy Municipal C t.-j-dC SeC-tiOT1 10,05,190: S VMC 10.05-1.90 is amended as fullou s: InsuFunce-Evideri - PCrmittarc, priQr to the UJITIMIC--11L70trent Of construction hereunder, shall furnish the I]in;cnr satisftic^lory evidence ]it v6- iting that I.IIc pemitirc ha-5 in frarcr during the pcrfe rrmirlrt of die construction work or activity, commercial genemi liability irumnince of not less thief one million, dollars (S1,000.000.00) per occurreTivc and a o TnilIion dollars (SQ.0€lil,{iflll.00) general ag gage drily issued by an insurance company authorized to do busing in this slate, fn additicm. the policy shrill name the City -,is an tddilional named imaired. The Dirrc:tur may reduce the inslrrm we limits if good cause eeisIL='. Section Sc%crab itity. If :u» action. suhswion, sentence or clause of this chapter is for any reason held to he invalid, such decitiiOn s1311 not affect the vafidity of the remaining provisions of this chapter. Section 81 1. Cffectivs_ te. lhis Ordinance shall he in full force :aid eft'L" tivc days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed on this day of '2006. 1v1aNor. Diana Wilhite - ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Buinbridsle Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: I-_f ective Date: CITY OF SPOKAiYE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 06-027 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, AMENDL\'G SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL:, CODE SECTION 10.05.070, 10.05.080, 10.05.090, 1.0.05.100 10.05.1.1.0, 10.05.130, 10.05.140 AND 1.0.05.180 RELATING TO RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS, PROVIDING FOR SEVERAl3IL ITY AND AN" EFFECTIVE DATE. NAMERFAS, the City adopted Ordinance 03-063, providing requirements for permits for certain activity in the public rights-of-way. Ordinance 03-063 was later codified into Spokane Valley Municipal Code 10.05.070-10.05.210; and W14EREAS, the City desires, from tirne to time, to :analyze the eti°ectiveness and appropriateness of its code requirements to determine if they can be improved for the benefit of its citizens; and WHEREAS, amending SVMC 10.05.070, 10.05.080, 10.05.090, 10.05.100, 10.05.110, 10.05.1.30, 10.05.140 and 10.05.180 will further the public health, safety and wel fare. f I~iOW THEREFORL, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as follows: Section 1. Intent. It is the intent of the City Council for the City of Spokane Valley to amend SVMC 10.05.070, 10.05.080, 10.05.090, 10.05.100, 10.05.110, 10.05.130, 10.05.1.40 and 10.05.180 relating to right-of-waypermits to make compliance with requirements easier for frequent users of the City s rights-of-way without compromising the health and safety of its citizens, or the condition of the City's infrastructure. Section 2. Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Cade section 10.05.070: SVMC 10.05.070 is amended as follows: 10.05.070 Defuiitions "Right-of-way" or "public way" means all property in which the City has any form of ownership or title, including casements, and which is held for public roadway or utility purposes, regardless of whether or not any roadway or utility gists thereon or whether it is used, improved or maintained for public use. "Director" means the city manager or designee. "Easement" meansa right of use benefitting the City over the property of another. "Roadway" means the paved, improved, or proper driving portion of a street within the City designed, or ordinarily used for vehicular travel. Section 3. Amending Spokane Vallee Municipal Code section 10.05.080: SVMC 1.0.05.080 is amended as follows: 10.05.080 Right-of-way Permit Required Unless exempted from permit requirements, a right-of-way permit is required of any person or company who performs construction work or otherwise engages in activity within existing City rights-of-way, or on City owned infrastructure. Permits shall not be required for the following: A. Work. done by or for the City within its rights-of-way. B. Work that is two hours or less in duration, as long as that work does not require closure of more than 50% of a non-arterial roadway, does not close any lanes on an arterial roadway, does not involve excavation within the right-of.=way, or does not involve cutting or placement of pavement, sidewalks, curbs or gutters. Exemption from the permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws, ordinances or standards of this jurisdiction. fn the case of an emergency, a private or public utility may comirence work prior to obtaining a permit, provided the person obtains a construction permit within 48 hours after work is commenced or on the first City business day following said elapsed 48-hour period. Right-of- way Permits issued between April 1 and September 30 are valid for 30 days after the date of issuance, with a one-time 30 day extension available. Right-of-way Permits issued between October 1 and March 31 shall be valid until the following April 30. Section 4. Amendi ie Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 10.05.090: SVMC 10.05.090 is amended as follows: -2- Right-of-way Permit-Application. No right--way permit shall be issued ` unless a written application is submitted and approved by the Director. The application shall; at a minimum, contain the following: A. Construction plans or drawings approved by the Director, if required; B. A traffic control plan if the work closes more than 50% of the non-arterial roadway, or closes any lanes on an arterial roadway; C. The period of time during which the right-of-way will be obstructed; andD. Proof of the contractor's and all subcontractors' state licensing, insurance and requirements. Depending upon the nature and extent of the construction activity or work, the Director may require engineering, restoration and drainage plans prepared by a Washington licensed engineer at applicant's sole cost and expense. At the discretion of the Director, a iMultiple-Use Permit may be available for licensed and bonded businesses and public utilities. The Multiple-Use Permit fee will be established by resolution in the Master Fee Schedule. The Nultiple-Use Permit shall expire at the end of the City Fiscal Year. The administrative regulations governing the Nfultiple-Use Permit shall be f- written and approved by the Director. Failure to comply with the t administrative regulations shall be a violation of this code. Section 5. Amending Spokane Vallee Nfunicipal Code section 10.05.100: SVMC 10.05. 100 is amended as follows: Right-of-way perniit fees. Right-of-way permit fees shall be adopted by resolution of the city council. Section b. Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 10.05.110: SVMC 10.05.110 is amended as follows: Notice Required. The applicant shall give to the Director notice not less than forty-eight (48) hours before any work or activity is commenced and shall notify the Director upon completion of the same If a traffic control plan is required to be submitted with the application, the applicant shall give the Director not less than 72 hours notice. In the event of an unexpected repair or emergency, work may be commenced as required under the circumstances. Unexpected repairs and emergency work shall comply with all other requirements of this Ordinance. Section 7. Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 1.0.05.130: SVMC 10.05.130 is amended as follows: -3- In the event it is necessary for the permittee to excavate the entire width of the roadway, no more than half of the roadway shall be opened for construction and closed to traffic at one time. Such portion of the work shall be backfilled and completed before the remaining portion of the roadway may be excavated. If it is impossible, infeasible or unsafe to permit the work while maintaining an open lane for traffic, the director may, with the concurrence with the chief of police and :fire chief, permit the roadway to be blocked for a short period of time where suitable detours can be provided and the public will not be unnecessarily inconvenienced. The permittee shall furnish facilities, such as bridges or other suitable means, or clearly identify appropriate detours, to allow the flow of traffic without unnecessary congestion. Section 8. Amending Spokane Vallee Municipal Code section 10.05.140: SVMC 10.05.140 is amended as follows: Traffic Control. Any person or company that performs construction work or otherwise engages in activity within the existing City rights-of-way, or on City-owned infrastructure, is responsible for all traffic control and assumes the responsibility to maintain appropriate signage, signals and barricades that protects the public safety, in accordance tivith the MUM). The person or company shall provide for the safe operation of all _ equipment, vehicles and persons within the right-of-way. Section 9. Amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 10.05.180: SVMC 10.05.180 is amended as follows: Insurance-Evidence. Perrrn-iittec, prior to the commencement of construction hereunder, shall furnish the Director satisfactory evidence in writing that the permittee has in force during the performance of the construction work or activity, commercial general liability insurance of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence and two million dollars ($2,000,000.00) general aggregate duly issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in this state. In addition, the policy shall name the City as an additional named insured. The Director may reduce the insurance limits if good cause exists. Section 10. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence or clause of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this chapter. Section U. Effective date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days aver publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. -4- Passed on this day of , 2006. Mayor, Diana Wilbite ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Tate: i -5- J CITY OF PANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2005 City Manager Sign-off, Item: Check all that apply: CD consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing information ❑ administrative report CK pending legislalion AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State law requires a public hearing and an amendment to our budget when the City will exceed appropriations (budget). Previous Council Action Taken: The City budget for 2006 was adopted in November 2005- Several amendments were authorized by the city council in May of this year. BACKGROUND: lf~ Additional budget adjustments are needed to- 1) transfer $1,500,000 to the Civic Facilities Fund for future facilities; ) adjust revenue sources by to anticipated levels; 3) update the budget for potential settleladjust costs of $400,000 for the sheriff contract; 4) include interest costs of $2,000 for a loan to the Community Development Block Grant Fund; 5) appropriate $50,000 for the remaining 2006 projected costs of the Eco-Northwest praguelAppleway Orrldor Revitalization Ilan; 6} appropriate $70,000 for the payments to the library district for delinquent taxes collected from property ownefs pursuant to contract; 7) appropriate 545,000 for the development of city-wide street standards; and 8) budget $24,000 for flashing school signals which becarre available via a grant. A more detailed listing of the proposed budget amendments is attached as Exhibit A. OPTIONS: Options include holding the hearing on November 28 or holding the hearing at a later date. i RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION, Staff recommends holding the hearing on November 28, to maintain our bbudget amendment schedule. BUDETIFINANIAL IMPACTS; Additional / new revenue has been identified to pay for these amendments to the 2006 budget. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mason Faulkner, Accountant/Budget Analyst City of Spokane Val]ey Exhlblt A Amendments to 2006 Budget Novern her 2006 REVENUE EXPENDITURE Fund INCREASE INCREASE Explanation GENERAL Unrestricted fund balance $ 1,300,000 Trarksferto Civic Facilities Fund 1,500,000 sees aside for of tacaldes Sates tax $ 722.000 - IncreOSe 10curfentemirnsie Planning study for 2{06 $ 5G.ow To iacrcaso to 2006 Projected costs, i Del inqu a rrk tax for library 70.001) Par conlrad vMh library district Transfer to Com_ Dev_ Block mnt 2,000 Tocaylnierestonl:5en_ Public Safety Contracts ~ 2i{)0,000 Pay setdc and adjust o;Ls%. General Fund Totals $ 2,022,000 S 2,022,000 Community Dev, Block Grant General fund contibugon + 2,000 Transfer from General Fund Merest expense $ 2.000 Interest on !Marfund ican Street interest income 45,000 TD update streat construction Professional services $ 45,000 standards as approved 10-10-06 Flashing school signal grant S 24,004 $ 24,000 Flashing signal lights I GRAND TOTALS---- S 2,093,000 2,093,000 ;Sudgetamendx 19-14-05 attach A CITY OF SPOT{ANFE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINAL U. NO. 06-028 AIN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINAINCE NO. 46-014 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 13, 2006 AND LN'YITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF POK-AINE VALLF , POK4t E COUNTY, WASHMGTONi," Wfff-CH AAIE1VI7.> D ORDINAI TCE NO. 05-029, TKU ADOPTED BUDGET FOR VI PERIOD OF JANUARY 1, 2006 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2006, APPROT"RIATMG FUNDS AND ESTABL1S.f1-MG ALARM S kf. ,DULES {Exliibi~ 'B} FOR E TABLKITED POSITIONS." WffE4 REA , subsquent to the adoption of the 2006 annual hudget, it has become necessary to make changes by adding new revenue, appropriations, amendments. and transferring funds in order to properly perform various City functions, services and ac-ti iti es; WHEREAS, the budget changes set forth in this Ordinance could not have been reasonably anticipated or known when the annual budget Nvas passed by the City Council. and J REREAS, the City Council has dete-nnined that the best interests of the City are served by amending the adopted budget to refcct anticipated revenue, expenditures, fund balances, and appropriating same as set forth herein- NOW THEREFORE, The City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington do ordain a5 follows: Section 1. Amended Revenues. Ordinance -No. 06-014, as adopted or amended, adopted s budget for the by elve mvnLhs ending December 31, 2006. Each item, revenue, appropriation, and find is hereby amended as follows. A. General Fund of the 2006 budget is aniended to include an additional $1,300,000 in unrestricted carryover fund balance from 2005. Sales Tax receipts are increased $722;000 for a total iiicrease in general fund revenLies of 2,02 ,000- B. CJ Block Grant Fund revenues are increased by $2,000 for a contribution from the Cie-neral Fund. C. Inte-rest income in the Street Fund is increased $45.000 representing additional interest generated by a greater than estimxLed fund balance and increasing interest rates. D. Orant proceeds for flashing school warning signals increases the Street Fund i . revenue by $245000. i Ordinansc 06025 Antending2006 Bridget Page I of4 i I For purposes of these budget amendments, Exhibit "-A" is attached hemto and incorporated _ b this reference as set forth in full. REVENUES- FUND FUND JUNE 2006 AMEwNQED ENDING NUMBER NAME BUDGETED REVENUES AMENDMENTS REVENUES 001 GENERAL- $ 32,410,641 $ 2,022,000 S 34,432,641 101 STREET $ 4,166,856 $ 139,000 S 4.255,856 102 ARTERIAL ST. $ 56B,655 $ - $ 555,655 103 TRAILTPATHS $ 23,053 $ - $ 23,853 105 HOTEUPAOTEL $ 400,667 a - $ 400,687 204 DE8T SERVICE 600,000 S - $ 6104,004 301 CAPITAL PROJ- S 1,210,OQO S - $ 1,210,000 302 SPEC. CAP. PRJ S 1,070.713 1,070,713 303 STREET CAP PRJ 5,385,843 $ - 5 8,995.843 304 MIRABEAU PT $ 783,205 $ 783,205 305 STREET BOND PRJ $ 1,2D2,460 $ S 1.202.460 306 COM DEV ELK GRNT $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,0aO 307 CAP-GRANTS 8,211,000 $ - $ 6,211, goo 308 EARKER EROGE FED $ 890,400 $ - $ 690,400 309 PARKS CAP. PRJ $ 1,300,000 - $ 1,300,000 390 CIVIC BUI 1-01 NG 1,100,000 S - $ 1,1100,004 120 CENTERPLACE OP. 300,000 S - r 504,000 121 SERVICE LEV- STAR 1,000,000 $ - 1,000.400 122 WINTER WEATHER $ 544,000 $ 500,000 402 GTORMWATER $ 1,621,534 $ - 1,621,534 501 EQUIP REPL & RES $ $93,257 $ - $ 693.257 502 RISK MGMT $ 199,939 $ - $ 189.939 TOTALS $ 66,628,223 S 2,093,000 $ 65,721.2 it i Section 2. Expenditures Appropriated. To appropriate the amendments from the above r' estimated re venues and unrestricted beginning fund balances for each separate fund, the Ordinance 06-028 Amending 2006 Budpl Prigs 2 04 expenditure appropriations for the period January I through December 31, 2006 are amended as set forth below. EXPEND IT UIZES/APPROPRIATIONS : FUND FUND JUNE 2005 AMENDED TOTAL NUMBER NAME APPROPRIATIONS AMENDMENTS APPROPRIATIONS 001 GENERAL $ 32,410,641 $ 2,022,000 $ 34,432,641 101 STREET $ 4,166,855 $ 69,000 $ 4,235,855 102 ARTERIAL ST. $ 568,655 S - $ 568,655 103 TRAILS/PATHS $ 23,053 S - $ 23,053 105 HOTEUMOTEL $ 400,667 S - S 400,667 204 DEBT SERVICE S 600,000 $ - S 600,000 301 CAPITAL PROJ. 5 1,210,000 $ - $ 1,210,000 302 SPEC. CAP. PRJ S 1,070,713 $ - $ 1,070,713 303 STREET CAP PRJ $ 8.385.843 $ - $ 8,385,843 304 MIRABEAU PT $ 783,205 $ - $ 783,205 305 S'rREET BOND PRJ $ 1,202,460 S - $ 1,202,460 306 COM DEV BLK GRNT S - $ 2,000 S 2,000 307 CAP. GRANTS S 6,211,000 S - , S. 8,211,000 308 BARKER BRDGE FED $ 890,400 $ - $ 890,400 309 PARKS CAP. PRJ S 1,300,000 $ - $ 1,300,000 310 CIVIC FACILITIES $ 1,100,000 $ - $ 1,100,000 120 CENTERPLACE OP. $ 300,000 $ - $ 300,000 121 SERVICE LEV. STAB $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 122 WINTER WEATHER $ 500,000 S - S 5Gfl,00~0 402 STORMWATER $ 1,621,534 S - S 1,621,534 ! 501 EQUIP REPL & RES S 693,257 S - S 693,257 502 RISK MGMT S 189,939 $ - S 189,939 TOTALS $ 66,628,223 $ 2,093,000 $ 68,721,223 These amendments include a transfer from the General Fund to the Civic Buildings Capital Projects Fund of $1,500,000; a $400,000 addition to the sheriffs contracts for settle and adjust costs occurring in the General Fund; a $2,000 increase in the CD Block Grant Fund for interest on an inter-fund loan; a $45,000 increase in appropriations in the Street Fund to update street construction standards as approved by the city council on October 10, 2006; a $50,000 increase in appropriations for remaining 2006 costs of the Sprague/Applewa-y Corridor Revitalization Plan study; $70,000 in payments to the Library District for delinquent taxes related to the 2005 property tax levy; and $24,000 for Street Fund flashing school warning lights. Section 3. Positions. The City of Spokane Valley's number of full-time equivalent positions is 63.8 with salary ranges as shown in Exhibit 13. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section S. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in fell force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this _ day of December, 2006 Ordinanec 06-028 Amending 2006 Budget Page 3 of 4 AYFEST: Diana Wi111ite, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED TO FORM: Cary P. D riskell, -Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date; Date of Publication; Ordinance Ordinance 06-028 amending 2006 8 udget Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B EMPLOYEE POSITION CLASSIFICATION MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE Exhibit B 2006 Budget Salaries Effective 7!16!2006 Position Title Grado 2006 Range Ci Manaoer Unclassified De u City Manager 21 $7,441 $ 9,540 Ci Attorney 21 7,441 - 9,540 Community Development Director 21 7,441 9,540 Finance Director 21 7,441 - 9,540 Public Works Director 21 7 441 - 9,540 Parks and Recreation Director 19 6,027 7,727 Planning Manager 18 5,425 6,955 Building Official 18 5,425 - 6,955 Senior Engineer - Capital Projects Develo ment 18 5 425 - 6,955 De u City Attorney 18 5,425 - 6,955 Senior Engineer - Traffic CIP PlanninolGrants 17 4,882 - 6,259 Accounting Manager 17 4,882 - 6,259 Ci Clerk 16 4,394 - 5,633 Engineer 16 4,394 5,633 Senior Plans Examiner 16 4,394 - 5,633 Senior Planner 16 4,394 - 5,633 Associate Planner 15 3,955 - 5.070 Assistant Engineer 15 3,955 - 5,070 Public Works Superintendent 15 3,955 5,070 ITSpecialist 15 3,955 5,070 CenterPlace Coordinator 15 3,955 - 5,070 Human Resource Analyst 14 3,559 - 4,563 Accountant/Budget Analyst 14 3,559 - 4,563 J Administrative Analyst 14 3,559 - 4,563 Assistant Planner 14 3,559 - 4,563 Buildin Inspector II 14 3.559 - 4,563 Plans Examiner 14 3,559 - 4,563 Public Information Officer 14 3,559 - 4,563 Engineering Technician 14 3,559 - 4,563 Senior Permit Specialist 14 3,559 - 4,563 Main tenancelConstruction Inspector 13-14 3,203 - 4,563 Recreation Coordinator 13-14 3 203 - 4,563 Code Enforcement Officer 13 3203 - 4,106 Buildin Inspector 1 13 3,203 4,106 Planning Technician 13 3,203 4.106 Deputy City Clerk 12-13 2,883 - 4,106 Senior Center Specialist 12-13 2,883 - 4,106 Administrative Assistant 11-12 2 595 - 3,696 Permit Specialist i 1-12 2,595 3,696 Accounting Technician 11-12 2,595 - 3 696 Maintenance Worker 11-12 2,595 - 3,696 Office Assistant II 10-11 2,335 - 3,326 Office Assistant 1 9-10 2,102 2,993 Recrea8on Assistant 5 1,323 - 1,735 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent] old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading of Ordinance No. 06-029, Amending SVMC 2.50 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: First touch presentation on August 8, 2006; second touch presentation on September 26, 2006. BACKGROUND: Council adopted various personnel-related ordinances and resolutions upon incorporation. The ordinance was codified as SVMC 2.50. At previous meetings, staff proposed some potential updates both to the Code and to a couple of the resolutions. This agenda item is limited to changes to the City Code. Revisions to the resolutions will follow at a subsequent Council meeting. The Code revisions that were already proposed were primarily housekeeping in nature. The draft ordinance includes some proposed additional changes. First, the phrase, "conditions of employment" has been removed from 2.50.010 (C) as items needing to be approved by Council, because Council approval of such issues is inconsistent with the Council-Manager form of s `i government. Second, staff proposes adding a few major personnel principles to the City code, including: ➢ Nepotism ➢ Conflict of Interest ➢ Violence in the Workplace Broad policy statements on these topics have been included in the draft ordinance for Council consideration. The statements are similar in nature to those that already exist for harassment, discrimination, whistleblower, equal employment, and drug free workplace. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to advance Ordinance No. 06-029 to a second reading. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS 1. Powerpoint Presentation 2. Draft Ordinance No. 06-029 J J CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 06-029 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASFIINGTON, AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 2.50.010, 2.50.020, 2.50.030, AND 2.50.040, ADDING NEW SECTIONS 2.50.035, 2.50.045, AND 2.50.055, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABIIATY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance 44 in 2003, which was later codified as SVMC 2.50., establishing certain employment provisions for employees of the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable from time to time to amend the laws of the City to comply with changes in state and federal law, and to reflect policy direction of the City Council; and WHEREAS, The City Council finds it is in the interest of the City to make amendments to SVMC 2.50. NOW, THE,I2EFORE', the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as follows: Section I. PuLpose and Intent. The purpose and intent of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC 2.50.010, 2.50.020, 2.50.030, and 2.50.040, to make them more consistent with requirements under state and federal law, and to add three new sections relating to nepotism, violence in the workplace and conflicts of interest. Section 2. Amendment to SVMC 2.50.010. SVMMC Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 010(B), is hereby amended as follows: A. There is established a human resources system for the City of Spokane Valley to provide a uniform system of personnel administration and ensure that recruitment, selection, placement, compensation, promotion, retention and separation of City employees are based upon qualifications and fitness in compliance; with federal, state, and City laws. B. Employment with the City shall be "at-will" and may be terminated at any time by either the City Manager or the employee, unless otherwise provided for by contract. No official or employee of the City, other than the City Manager, shall have the authority to enter into any agreement for employment. C. Personnel Policies that relate to wages and benefits shall be submitted to the City Council for review and approval with the City Manager authorized, directed and empowered to development administrative policies, procedures, rules, forms and materials that are consistent with the Personnel Policies in order to implement the human resources system of the City. Said policies and procedures shall comply with all related state and federal laws, as well as City ordinances and resolutions. Page 1 Section 3. Amendment to SVMC 2.50.020. Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 020 is hereby amended as follows: It is the policy of the City to ensure equal employment opportunity for all employees and appointed representatives. This commitment includes a mandate to promote and afford equal treatment and services to all citizens, employees and City representatives, and to assure equal employment opportunity based on ability and fitness in accordance with any applicable state or federal law. Section 4. Amendment to SVMC 2.50.030. Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 030 is hereby amended as follows: The City of Spokane Valley shall comply with all state and federal laws regarding non- discrimination. Section 5. Amendment to SVMC 2.50.040. Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 040 is hereby amended as follows: A. It is the policy of the City to seek to eliminate and/or prevent conduct constituting unlawful harassment under state or federal law, as well as to alleviate any effects such unlawful harassment may have on the working conditions of an employee. The City shall adopt a policy for investigating and responding to reports of unlawful harassment and detailing complaint procedures. Section 6. Adding SVMC 2.50.035. Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 035 relating to nepotism is hereby added as follows: A. 'Nepotism Prohibited. The City prohibits employment of family members where one family member has the authority to supervise or audit the work of another family member. - B. The definition of "family member" for purposes of this section shall be the same as that in RCW 42.52.010, as adopted or amended. Section 7. Adding SVMC 2.50.045. Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 045 relating to conflict of interest is hereby added as follows: Conflict of Interest. No City employee shall engage in any act which is in conflict with, or creates an appearance of conflict with, the performance of official duties. Section 8. Addinp, SVMC 2.50.055. Title 2, Section 50, Subsection 055 relating to violence in the workplace is hereby added as follows: Violence in the workplace. The City of Spokane Valley, as an employer, does not tolerate acts of violence to persons or property in the workplace. Section 9. Remainder of SVMC 2.50 Unchangd. The remaining provisions of SVMC 2.50 are unchanged by this amendment. Scction 10. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance should be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Page 2 Section 11. Effix:tive Date. This Ordinance shall be in full fume and effect thirty (30) days after publication of the Ordinance Summary. PASSED by the City Council this day of November, 2006. Mayor, Diana Wilhite ATTEST: City Clerk, Chris Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Personnel Ordinance • and Resolutions - Amendments to SVMC 2.50 Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager November 28, 2006 ~ Personnel Policies Requiring Council Approval o Wages (approved via Council Resolution or Motion) o Benefits (approved via Council Resolution or Motion) o Major Principles (codified in SVMC 2.50) 2 Update of Personnel iNove.-Fber 28, --'OD3 ~ I Changes to SVMC 2.50: Major Principles o Equal Employment Opportunity (existing) o Nepotism (add) o Conflict of Interest (add) o Whistleblower (existing) o Harassment (existing) o Violence in the Workplace (add) o Drug Free Workplace (existing) 3 Update of Personnel o,m,unrf:. rvo.i„cer 28, 2006 Already Proposed Changes: • SVMC 2.50 0 2.50.010 Human resources system established Retained at-will unless otherwise provided by contract 0 2.50.020 and .030 Equal employment opportunity and Nondiscrimination Removed list of protected classes and cited applicable state and federal laws 0 2.50.040 Sexual harassment Broadened to unlawful harassment in general Cited applicable state and federal laws Removed description of investigative method Update of Personnel Ordinance arw- November 28, 2006 Newly Proposed Additions: • SVMC 2.50 0 2.50. 010 (c) Remove "conditions of employment" as approved by City Council (inconsistent with Council-Manager form of government) eJ Update of Pzrsaii nei [)rdinenc Ncwemcei 26. 20GG ~ Newly Proposed Additions: SVMC 2.50 o Nepotism The City prohibits employment of family members where one family member has the authority to supervise or audit the work of another. Family is defined via the WA Ethics in Public Service Act (RCW 42.52.010) 5 update of Personnel ,ni xo..mee, za. 2006 ~ Newly Proposed Additions: SVMC 2.50 o Conflict of Interest No City employee shall engage in any act which is in conflict with, or creates an appearance of conflict with, the performance of official duties. 7 UPtlate of Personnel Ordin.iwi~ -.mr : November ?d. 2006 ~ Newly Proposed Additions: SVMC 2.50 o Violence in the Workplace The City of Spokane Valley as an employer does not tolerate acts of violence to persons or property in the workplace. 8 Update of Personnel <.lidin::n~.:: November 28. 2006 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information admin. report X pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Amended Fee Resolution 06-024 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Resolution 06-014 contains the existing fee schedule for the city. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Resolution 06-014 was passed in July of 2006 and included updated city fees. As the city moves into 2007 there are a few additional changes that need to be incorporated into the fee schedule. The city council reviewed the proposed changes at the November 14, council meeting. BACKGROUND: The city uses a resolution to establish fees for city programs, permits and services. Periodically, the city must update the fee resolution to incorporate new or modified fees. The changes needed at this time include: 1. Deleting the blasting permit fee 2. Increasing the storm water fee from $20 to $21 per Equivalent Residential Unit to parallel Spokane County fees. 3. Updating right of way permit fees (pending review) 4. Updating development fees for subdivisions and short plats OPTIONS: Make changes to the proposed fees. Leave the fees as they exist today. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff recommends council approve these revisions to the fee resolution. These proposed changes would be effective January 1, 2007. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: General fund fee increases are intended to keep city fees at a level where costs are recovered. The storm water fee will generate an estimated increase of $75,000 for storm water projects and programs. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASIffN'GTON RESOLUTION NO. 06-024 A RLSOL UTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AiNI -ND.ING RESOLUTION .06-014, AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, it is the general policy of the City to establish fees that are reflective of the cost of services provided by the City; and W14EREAS, the City uses a resolution to establish fees for City programs; permits and services, and periodically, the fee resolution must be updated to incorporate new or modified services; and WHEREAS, Council desires to modify the Resolution and accompanying Fee Schedule. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. The changes needed at this time are incorporated into the attached schedules, and include (1) deleting a blasting permit fee (page S); (2) increasing the storm water fee per equivalent residential unit to $21 from $20 (page 19); (3) updating the right of way permit fee (page 10); (4) miscellaneous house keeping changes (pages 7, 9, 10 and 12); and updating plat/binding site plan fees (pages 3, 4). Section 2. Repeal. To the extent that previous fee schedules are inconsistent with those set forth herein, they are repealed. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in fiill force and effect on January 1, 2007. Approvcd this _ clay of December, 2006. A`f"fEST: CITY OF SPO.KANIE- VALLEY Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Diana Wilhite, Mayor Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney AMENDED . ATE :FFF SCHEDULE Fee Schedule Page No. Schedule A. Development Schedule B. Building 5 Schedule : Fire Code 13 Schedule D: Pars Recreation 1 Schedule E: Administrative; 1 Schedule F: Other Fees 0 Fec Rcsolation 06-014 Page 2 of 19 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Schedule A - DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENTS Comprehensive Plan amendment SI-SIN1.00 Zoning or other code text amendment $1.5000 APPEALS Appeal of Administrative Decision $1,000.00 Appeal of Hearing Examiner findings 5300.00 Transcript/record deposit fee on appeals of hearing $150.00 Fxaminer's decisions Appeal of determination made pursuant to SVMC S500.00 10.30.150-.660 ENVIRONMENTAL RFS'IFW State Environmental Policy Act (SI:.I'A) Single dwelling (when required) $100.00 All other developments 5350.00 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Review $2.200.00 Addenda of existing EIS Review 5350.00 Shoreline Substantial Development Permit 5800.00 Critical Arras 5300.00 Floodplain Permit S50.00 Per lot PERMITS Home Occupation Permit .580.00 Conditional Use Permit $800.00 't'emporary U.Ke Permit $150.00 PLATS Subdivisions Preliminary plat $2,324 52.150.00 Plus 540.00 per lot Final plat $1,424 51,250.00 Plus $10.00 per lot Short Plan Preliminary 2-4 lots S 924 5750.00 Final Plat 2-4 Lots $1,224 SI,0950.00 Plus $10.00 per lot Preliminary plat 5-9 hots SIA24 S1,250.00 Plus $25.00 per lot Final Plat 5-9 Lots $1.224 S1,050.00 Plus 510.00 pcr lot Fee Resolution 06.014 Page 3 of I', Plat Alteration Subdivision plat S650.00 Short plat S265.00 Binding Site Plan Binding site plan modification $1,474 $1,300.00 Change of Conditions no change S650.00 Binding site plan $1,674 $11500.00 Aggregation/Segregation Lot line adjustment 5100.00 I,ot line elimination $100.00 Zero lot line $100.00 Plus $10.00 per lot SIGNS Review of permanent sign S50.00 Plus $25.00 if Public Works review is needed Review of temporary sign S50.00 tillI I11,%N. RIM(-W S55I).00 S] RE.Fl" VA(-'ATl(-)N ANT ICA I ION SI U)1).00 VARIANCES Administrative 53000) Public Hearings 51.500•(10 ZONING Zoning map amendments (rezonc)* $1,650.00 PUD plan S1,500.00 PIuK 525.1111 per lot PUD modification 5500.00 •11 rezone is combined with other action(s), cost of other nction(s) is additional. Note: lic Building Official is authorized to require the permit applicant to provide fee reimbursement to the City of Spokane Valley f'or any professional services required outside of City staff review. Some examplc.,; of potential outside rL~sourccs include plan rcvic«. consti-twhon inspection turd surn,cving. Fee Re%olution (Ki-014 Page 4 of IQ Schedule B - BUILDING I'he building code permit fees are collected at the time of the issuance of the building permit. Other fees are also to be collected at the time of the issuing of the building permit. F.ach department for whom the fee is collected is to advise the permit specialist of fees due. GRADING Permit Feces Cubic Yards FEE 100 or less $20.00 101 to 1,000 $20.00 for the first 100 Cu. Yd., plus $7.00 for each additional 100 Cu. Yd. 1,001 to 10,000 $83.00 for the first 1,001 Cu. Yd., plus $6.00 for each additional 1,000 Cu. Yd. 10,001 to 100,000 $147.00 for the first 10,000 Cu. Yd. plug $15.00 for each additional 10,000 Cu. Yd. 100,001 to 200,000 $368.00 for the first 100,000 Cu. Yd. plus $15.00 for each additional 100,000 Cu. Yd. 200,000 or more $503.00 for the first 200,000 Cu. Yd. plus 515.00 for each additional 200,000 Cu. Yd. Bladkg Pen it Fee (Life Safety) $60 Delete Plans Checking Fees Cubic Yards FfL; 50 or less No fee 51 to 100 $12.00 101 to 1,0041 $20.00 1,001 to 10,000 525.00 10,001 to 100,000 $25.00 for the rmt 10,000 Cu. Yd. plus $7.00 for each additional 10,000 Cu. Yd. 100,001 to 200,000 598.00 for the first 100,000 Cu. Yd. plus $6.00 for each additional 100,000 Cu. Yd. 200,001 or more S 158.00 Land Clearing only (without earth being moved) $65.00 Paving Permit (greater than 5,000 SF - new paving only) $250.00 Fee Resolution 06-01.1 Faze i of 19 STIt1lCITRAL C'ODF Building permit fees for each project are set by the following fee schedule. Ire table below is to be used to determine the building permit fees and plans chock fees based on the value of the construction work as stated by the applicant or the value calculated by the Building Official using the latest valuation data published in the Building,Safety Journal by the International Code Council, whichever value is greatest. Valuation Table Total Valuation Fee $1 to $25,000 $69.25 for the first $2,000 plus $14 for each additional 51,000, or fraction thereof, up to and including $25,000 $25,001 to 550,000 $391.25 for the first $25,000 plus 510.10 for each additional 51,000, or fraction thereof, up to and including $50,000 $50,001 to S 100,000 $643.75 for the first $50,000 plus S7 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, up to and including 5100,000 $100,001 to $500,000 5993.75 for the first $100,000 plus 55.60 for each additional 51,000, or fraction thereof, up to and including $500,000 $500,001 to SI,000,000 S3,233.75 for the first S500,000 plus 54.75 for each additional S1,000, or fraction thereof, up to and including 51,01)0,000 .x1,000,000 and up $5,608.75 for the first $1,000,000 plus 53.15 for each additional $1,000, or fraction thereof Valuation l;xceptions Fcc I'cr Square Fula Private garages (wood frame) 519.00 Private garages (masonry) S22.00 Pole buildings $19.00 Open carport, decks, porches $15.00 Plans Review Fees For other than signs, unc acid two falTUIN, residential struclure'ti :loll the as,,ocl: icd accessory buildings or structure, a Plans Review Fee Deposit of $200 shall he collected at the time of acceptance of the Building Permit Application. The application shall he accepted only when the application is determined to be complete by City staff. For signs, one and two family residential structures and the associated accessory buildings or structures, no plan review deposit will be required at the time of Building Permit Application submittal. The balance of the Plan Review Fes shall be collected at the time of Building Permit issuance along with the WSBCC Fee. Any excess deposit collected during the application prolxss shall be applied to the Building Permit Fee. Plans Review Fees are riot refundable once: the plan review has been started. Plans Review Dees are additional to Building Permit Fees. fer Resolution 0&01.1 1'lf',C fi ill 1 i► Plans review fee (general) 65% Of bldg permit fee Puns review fee - Group R-3 occupancies (single 40% Of bldg permit fee family less than 7,999 sq. M) Plans review fee - Group R-3 occupancies (single 65% Of bldg permit fee family 8,000 sq. M or greater) Plans review fee - U-1 or U-2 occupancies (sheds, 25% Of bldg permit fee barns, etc.) Plans review fee - temporary tent or structure 25% Of bldg permit fee Initial Plan Review Fees shall be capped at S+3-5,000 maxirnum with the following exception: Exception 41: If additional professional resources are required for individual project plan review for those projects that mach the maximum Plan Review I'm the Building Official ,hall he authorized to, require the permit applicant to provide those resources to the City of Spokane Valley If a set of plans already checked and approved is resubmitted Ivy the onvner or hislher agent. an hourly rate oaf $58.00 will he applied for (lie re-review PLUMBING CODE I-he plumbing code fees N;il) he collccted vwhrn the associated permit is issuccl. If the, plumbing is included in the Building Permit the unit costs are added, but not the hwoc plumbing permit fee. A. Basic fees I ) Basic fee for issuing each permit .$35.00 2) Basic for each supplemental permit $7-550 B. Unit fees (in addition to the basic fee) 1) For each_ plumbing fixture on a trap (including $6.00 garbage disposals, dish washers, back flow device, drainage, hot tubs, built in water softener, water closets, lavatories, sinks, drains, etc ) 2) Private sewage disposal system 520.00 3) Water heater 56.00 Each 4) Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor 515.00 including its trap and vent, except kitchen type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps. S) Repair or alteration of water piping, drainage 56.00 Each fixture or vent piping 6) Lawn sprinkler system an any one meter $25.00 Delete 7) Atmospheric type vacuum breaker 56.00 Each 8) Backflow protective device other than S6.00 Each atmospheric type vacuum breakers 9) Medical gas 56.00 Per outlet 10) Interceptors S6.00 Each Fee Resolution 06-014 Pare 7 of 19 MECHANICAL CODE The mechanical code fees will be collected when the associated permit is issued If i! i, ;n, IUkL:J in t}t Building Permit, the unit costs are added, but not the basic mechanical permit fee A. Basic fees 1) Basic fee for issuing each permit $35.01) 2) Basic for each supplemental permit $7.50 B. Unit fees (in addition to the basic fee) 1) Furnaces & suspended heaters - Installation or relocation a. up to and including 100,000 btu $12.00 b. over 100,000 btu 515.011 2) Duct work system S 10.00 3) heat pump & air conditioner- s. 0 to 3 tons `12•00 b. over 3 to 15 tons $20.00 c. over 15 to 30 tons $25.01) d. over 30 to 50 tons 535.00 e. over 50 tons S60.00 4) Gas water beater S10.00 5) Gas piping system $1.00 Per outlet 6) Gas log, fireplace, and gas insert installation S10.00 7) Appliance vents installation; relocation; $10.00 Each replacement A) Rcpairs or additions S15.00 9) Boilers, compressors, and absorption systems a. 0 to 3 hp -100,000 btu or less $12.00 b. Over 3 to 15 hp -100,001 to 500,000 btu 520.00 c. Over 15 - 30 hp - 500,001 to 1,000,000 525.00 btu d. over 30 by - 1,000,001 to 1,750,000 btu $35.00 e. over 50 by - over 1,750,000 btu $60.00 10) Air Handlers a. Each unit up to 10,000 cfm, including S12.00 ducts b. Each unit over 10,000 cfm $15.00 11) Evaporative Coolers (other than portable) $10.00 12) Ventilation and exhaust a. Each fan connected to a single duct 510.00 b. Each ventilation system $12.00 c. Each hood served by mechanical exhaust $12.00 13) Incinerators a. Installation or relocation of residential 519.00 b. Installation or relocation of commercial $22.00 14) Appliances, each 510.011 15) Unlisted appliances a. under 400,000 btu $50.011 h. 400,000 btu or over 5100.00 Fcc Resolution 116-111.1 I'.~t c S of 11+ 16) Hood a. Type 1 $50.00 b. Type 11 $10.00 17) L P Storage tank 510.00 18) Wood or Pellet stove insert 510.00 19) Wood stove system - free standing $25.00 ENERGY CODE Energy Code Plans check fee is also established to check to meet the requirements of KCW >1-1 1 WAC These are in addition to the Building Code Foes. If City inspectors are assigned to verify Energy Plans. the following fees apply. If an outside energy inspector is required. that fez will he determined by the outside agency and the fees below will not apply. Residential Remodel/Addition S4)- New Single Family S4)- Tenant Improvement A. 0 to 10,000 square feet 535.00 D. 10,001 square feet and over S45.00 C. Multi-Family S60.00 Per building D. New Commercial and industrial S90.00 OTHER HVILDING CODE: FEES Annual Permit Annual Spokane Valley Building Permits used to: 1) maintain equipment or buildings, 2) construct or remodel small areas of assembly (xxupancies. or 3) install tents or membrane structures may be available depending upon the determination of the valuation of work made by the Spokane Valley Building Official. Certain record keeping and inspection responsibilities shall be established in a site spexific Spokanc Valley Annual Permit Agreement. Approach Permit 550.00 Demolition Permit Single Family Residence 544.00 Commercial buildings $125.00 Garage or accessory building associated with a $20.00 residence or commercial building Septic tank or underground flammable tank associated $10.00 Facb with a residence or commercial building Carly Start Agreements (Foundations) 25% Of bldg permit fee Right-of-Way Hermit see below $70.00 Fee Resolution 06.413 Page 9 of 19 Category 1 Non-cut obstruction without clean-up S70 2 Non-cut obstruction with clean-up SIDS 3 Pavement cut obstruction non-wintcr $160 4 Pavement cut obstruction, winter 5200 5 Long-duration or large projects 5160 A traffic control plan review is required if more than 50% of the width of any street is closed or if a single arterial lane is closed. Plan review fee SSl1 If a category 5 permit requires additional time, the additional fee is S40 for each additional 3 days or part thereof. Multiple-use and long-duration permits shall require a minimum deposit of $1,000 Sign Fees lees collected fur a sign pcrmit and a plans check Ice fur signs erected in accordance with the Sip Codc. I'hc fee helow phis the WSIRV fey of $4 50, Signs mounted on buildings S45.00 Sign and lmle mounting $65.00 1'ernporary Certificate of Occupancy 550.00 Washington State Building Code Council (W.S.B.C.C.) Surcharge A flat fcc of $4.50 will be collected on each permit for approved plans or any other permit that is issued in accordance with the Spokane Valley Building Code. EXCEPT: For multi-family projects, the fee is $4.50 for the first living unit and $2.00 for each additional unit. The City Finance [hpartment will forward this fee to lire WSBCC on a quarterly basis. OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES A. For City personnel 1) Hourly rate set for City Employees (unless 558.00 otherwise specified) 2) Overtime charges I.S times regular rate B. Hourly rate for contracted services Set according to contract rate C. Hourly rate for special called inspections 558.00 D. Mobile home location permit and inspection Fee Resolution 06-014 Pa'-c 10 of IQ 1) Temporary mobile home $60.00 Z) Manufactured home inspection, per section $50.00 " F. House Moving. Fee 1) Class 1, II, and III - Moving permit $60.00 2) Class I, 11, and Ill - Inspection fee 560.00 3) Class 1V (if already permitted by Spokane S-0- County or Spokane City) Plus basemenilcrawlspace valuation permit fee "Plus $58.00 per hour after the hour. and $.50 per mile if the building to be moved into the City is outside the City limits Fee Resolution 06-0 14 Page 1 I of 19 F. Minimum Housing Inspection fee 555.00 Plus $58.00 per hour after 0 hour G. Work on any structure or building without a permit if a Spokane Valley Permit is required: 1) Minimum investigative inspection fee 555.00 2) Total investigative fee to be equal to the permit fee determined for the value of the illegal work accomplished H. Special inspections (requested by owner or tenant) 1) Fire, wind, mud slide or flood damage x61101 2) Day Care $60.00 3) Nursing Homes, hospitals, et a1 $60.00 Plus S 58.00 per hour after 1st hour 4) Special Occupancies 560.00 L Excess inspections for a given project created by 558.00 Per inspection or the developer, owner or contractor re-inspection J. Condominium conversion plans review/inspection Based on value of fee project and bldg code valuation K. Temporary tents, canopies, and air supported structures for public use; inclusive of all tents for a single event. It does not apply to tents less than 200 sq. ft., canopies Items than 400 sq ft, camping tents, or to tents used for private, non commercial events. 1) Plans check fee $13.00 2) Basic permit fee $60.00 Ili. Enclosing an existing deck or patio 1) Plana check fee -40% Of the basic fee for plans examination 2) Basic permit fee Based on value of project; minimum 53,000 M. Swimming pools (Over 5,000 gallons) $50.00 Plus plumbing fees N. Re-roof Permit: Fee based on the value of the project. No plan review fee will be charged unless plans are submitted for review. 0. Change of Use or Occupancy Classification permit 547.00 S58 P. Towers, elevated tanks, antennas Rsmed tin value of project IWILD1NC CODE FEE REFUND POLICY No Permit I-ce refund is allowed once the work has been started. If a refund is requested, the request shall be addressed to the Building Official in writing, and shall be received at the Spokane Valley Permit Center within 180 days of the date of issuance of the permit. Any fee refund request received after 180 days of the date of permit issuance shall he denied. Any refund approved shall be limited to 80% of the total Permit Fce paid. Refunds shall he limited to Building, Plumbing and %Icchamcal I'cunit f,-Ts paid to the City of Spokane Valley. Fet: Resolution 06-014 Pai,,e 12 of 19 Schedule C - FIRE CODE FIRE ALARM, SPRINKLER AND OTHER PROTECTION SYSTEMS City processing fee of $35 is added to these Fire District 1 fees. Plans check and review fees, inspections, and permit for installation of separate fire alarm system or sprinkler system applications, and other fire protection systems. Fire Alarm System New installation 1-4 devices $150 5-100 devices $250 Additional 100 devices $ 50 Each additional panel $ 40 Sprinkler supervision only $ 75 Each additional floor $ 40 Fire Sprinkler Systems 1-9 heads $ 53 10-49 $165 50-100 $275 101-200 $325 201-300 $350 301-400 $375 401-500 $425 500+ $500 + $33 per head For hydraulically designed systems multiply the above fee by 2 New Suppression Systems Range hoods, halon, C02, dry chemical, FM 200, intergen spray booths, etc. Unit 1-5 nozzles $100 Over 5 nozzles $100 + $10 per nozzle Bottle(s) $30 per bottle Fire Pump Installation Plan review & inspection fee $500 Underground Fire Mains - Plan review and inspect. $150 Standpipes not a part of automatic suppression system Plan review and inspection $150 F'ce Resolution 06-014 Page 13 of 19 Other Protection Systems Fire extinguishing system (other than sprinklers) - $ 50 plus $1.50 per nozzle Standpipe installation Class I and Class 11 $ 58 Class III $ 70 Tank installation - per tank Flammable and combustible liquids - storage tanks installation $ 60 Hazardous materials - storage tanks installation $ 60 Liquefied petroleum $ 60 Gaseous oxygen systems $ 60 Nitrous systems $ 60 Medical gas systems $ 60 Hazardous material recycling systems $ 60 Vapor recovery system $ 60 Cryogenic $ 60 Removal, abandonment or any combination thereof of flammable or combustible liquid storage tanks $ 90 Emergency or standby commercial power generator install $ 60 PERMITS Conditional Use Permit $ 60 Temporary Use Permit $ 60 Tcnts/canopy Permit (event) To be determined PLANS CHECK AND REVTEW BY THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION New commercial plans check and inspection (for projects not mentioned elsewhere) $ 60 LAND USE Subdivision/PUD Preliminary $120 Final $ 60 Short Plat Preliminary $120 Final $ 60 Fce Resolution 06-014 Page 14 of 19 Schedule D - PARKS & RECREATION ADMTNTSTRATTVE FEES Basic fees to be considered when applying rates Administrative Fee $30.00 Refuse Fee $50.00 AQUATICS Pool admission (age 5 and under) free Pool admission (age older than 5) $1.00 Pool punch pass (25 swims) $20.00 Weekend family discount 1 child under 13 free with paying adult Reservation (less than 50 people) $100.00 Per hour* Food fee (if applicable) $25.00 Reservation (50 -100 people) $125.00 Per hour* Food fee (if applicable) $50.00 Reservation (101-150 people) $150.00 Per hour* Food fee (if applicable) $75.00 *Mininium 2 tours 1 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PERMIT Alcoholic Beverage Permit Fee $10.00 CENTERPLACE Conference Center Wing Auditorium $75.00 Per hour Auditorium $450.00 Per day Auditorium $225.00 Per half day Auditorium w/Presentation System .$50.00 Per hour Auditorium w/Presentation System $300.00 Per day Auditorium w/Presentation System $150.00 Per half day Auditorium Deposit $50.00 Executive Conference Room $50.00 Per hour Executive Conference Room Deposit $50.00 Meeting Room (Day & Evening Use) $40.00 Per hour Meeting Room $250.00 Per day Meeting Room $125.00 Per half day Meeting Room Deposit $50.00 Fee Resolution 06-014 Page 15 of 19 Great Room Kitchen w/Dining Room Rental $100.00 Per use Kitchen - Commercial Use (2 hour min.) $50.00 Per hour Kitchen Deposit $50.00 Multi-UseBanquet Hall $100.00 Per hour Multi-Use/Banquet Hall $800.00 9 hr session Multi-Use/Banquet Hall $1,500.00 All day (6am-lam) Small Dining Area $50.00 Per hour Deposit $200.00 Stage $20.00 Per section per day Table Settings (linens & tableware) $2.00 Per place setting Senior Center Wing Lounge with Dance Floor $100.00 Per hour Lounge with Dance Floor S800.00 Per clay Lounge Deposit $200.00 Meeting Room (Evening Use) $40.00 Per hour Meeting Room (Evening Use) $125.00 4 hr session fleeting Room (Weekend Use) 5250.00 Per day Meeting Room (Weekend Use) $1.25.00 Per half day Meeting Room Deposit $50.00 Private Dining Room $50.00 Per hour Private Dining Room Deposit $50.00 Wellness Center $100.00 Per hour Miscellaneous Cleanup fee $50-300 Per event Host/Hostess (after hours) $15.00 Per hour Presentation System (includes projector/podium/ 5250.00 Per day DVD/VCR/sound system/camera system) Room Setup $25.00 Per hour Satellite Video Conferencing $250.00 Per hour Sound System S40.00 Per day Technical Support $40.00 Per hour Television/VCR $75.00 Per day Touch Pad Voting System $115.00 Base station per +$15.00 clay Per keypad per day EVENTS - includes Pavilion Events include but are not limited to activities such as car shows, tournaments and activities involving 200 or more people. The Director of Parks and Recreation will make the final determination. General Fee $150.00 Non-profit applications $80.00 Or free with sponsorship* *Applications for joint sponsorship with the City of Ypokane Valley will be considered by the Spokane Valley Parks Department. Fee Resolution 06-014 Page 16 of 19 FIELD RENTAL. Use Fee $25.00 First hour plus $15 each additional hour INDOOR USE Open gym admission $2.00 Playground program admission (10 entries) $20.00 M I RABEAU Mirahcau Springs Small shelter and waterfall $150.00 Maximum 4 hours Refundable deposit (less than 200 people) $50.00 Mirabeau Meadows Shelter (less than 200 people) $80.00 Shelter (200 or more people) $150.00 Refundable deposit (less than 200 people) 550.00 Refundable deposit (200 or more people) $250.00 PICNIC SHELTLI6 Picnic Shelter (less than 200 people) S30.00 Picnic Shelter (200 or more people) $150.00 Refundable deposit (less than 200 people) $50.00 Refundable deposit (200 or more people) $250.00 PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHY Permit Fee $25.00 Annual RECREATION Recreation program fees are set to recover costs as specified in the Parks and Recreation revenue policy. VALLEY MISSION ARENA Rental* $100.00 Per weekend Refundable deposit $50.00 *Renter responsible for on-site preparation. Rental requires liability insurance. Fee Resolution 06-014 Page 17 of 19 Schedule E -ADMI TR T E COIF" FEES Copy of audio tapes, video tapes, phatos, maps or other At cost ` . records needing reproduction Cory of written records $0.15 Per page Copy - )Large format $3.00 Per page Copy of full documents At enst OTHER ADMINL TRATI E FEES NSF Check $25.00 i I Fee Resolution 06-014 Page 18 of 19 Schedule F - OTHER FEES ADULT ENTERTAINMENT FEES Establishment Licenses Live Adult Entertainment $I,_S 0.00 Adult Arcade $1.500.00 Other Adult Entertainment Licen..ses Adult Arcade Device License $150.00 Manager License $150.00 Entertainer License $150.00 Late License Fee - Charged in addition to license: (cc. Percent of Past Due Calendar Days License Fcc 7-30 25% 31 - 60 50%, 61 and over 75% BUSINESS REGISTRATION FEES Business registration $13 each year Nonprofit registration $ 3 each year SECURITY FALSE ALARM FEES Repeated malfunctioning security false alarms in a given six-month period. First alarm No charge Second alarm 530.00 Third alarm $70.00 Fourth and subsequent alarms S120.00 STORM WATER UTILITY CHARGE ON DEVELOPED PARCELS Each single-family unit each year S21 20.00 All other properties each year S21 20.00 Per 3,160 square feet of imper viou4 surface TOW OPERATOR ANNUAL REGISTRATION FEE $100.00 OVFRSl%I,.D LOAD PERMIT FGF $25.00 Fte Resolution 0" 1 •t llaee 19 of 19 Proposed Fee Resolution NOVEMBER 28, 2006 KEN THOMPSON i. _ Proposed Fee Resolution, Continued E I- E 0 • Delete Blasting Permit Fee • Increase Storm Water Fee • Right of Way Fees • Subdivision & Binding Site Plan Fees • Misc. house keeping changes w re Pow: MILE F N FOOTHILL CANADA N'RY ! SPOKANE C) HINGTON+' ►MOM AwrM ti~ , tr JMp.vtl 411)<LN . ~ 1r~ inAr ter. r at ► R c DIEM AN ...M. • MYr►~ r „ `3To Mexico P 15&89 l O ►oTv w w~.tlNtirry w G„ L r NROSE AEIb R HEI(WTs 1, MC N" 1 tyq,~p►sl~ 1"J~` d^ ~~~iiiMMM ~1 ~ 4~.t~~~ ~ ~ • l sue' ~ ~ . ~ ♦ ~ 1 1 l- - w _ i i 9 ALA Background of the NSC ■ Idea conceived in 1946. ■ FEIS approved in April 1997. (Began process in 1991) ■ Supplemental FEIS approved in September 2000 for NSC north of Spokane River. Maintaining EIS documents is an ongoing process. ■ Safety and Mobility Benefits ■ Economic Benefits PopulationNehicle Miles Travelled in Urban Area 12, 000,000 600,000 10, 000, 000 500,000 8,000,000 400,000 r VMT - m 6,000,000 300,000 CL Population o - CD 4,000.000 200,000 a ~ z 2,000,000 1 00 000 I 0 ~ 1990 2000 2010 2020 Year Ab North Spokane Corridor Travel Time Reduction j.61 It, to, All Routes are Northbound From Sprague Ave. to Magtesftm Rd art ~ ~ North Spokarss Corridor Travel Tire 1 ~NT[MCt1Alw71: ~ ~i ~ n~hrren_ ~y r.uarenx Maple St ?J _ yjt~ rvnsaa ~+•rj w.r -Ow a► 9 k~ ri ~ Division St to prrrC4 MS1 uxh+aAnr w1 N ~M Market St t~ ~ - - - 1S. ~ftiic747r{7t ~ rrrr!~ "I. a1 I 0 6 10 16 20 26 30 35 ■Travol Tres Wdh NSC Completed Mhwtes !t ■ AdkiWonal Travel Time Without NSC I.wTtA ILf1w74 V7 i:rtaactPA ~d~ Fw~x,. nnu,~c~v«t Funding Phases Environmental and Alt Environwert-tp-i Pi7r-?ses Phase 1 u - ~.c S P, ! nd~n FFrancis ickel Olk to dermere t C yr .4 ILL Trans ortation Partnership Act: ~r' = 10 Phace TPA k ~.,t~. ~ , ~•t~ I JA n ~ eke i E7 f i .rs+ t.o iol ~ i'' + Sri ' 1$~~~i ' r r . ~ - . ,1 ~ y, ~ - ~.r . ' X4`47 r ~ I . ( , ' 6esr _-,I ~A ~r r' 1 : S'1tl bIr $A W, ir~ ^:~•N)r••~1('1~"~('.'~iF,'^~ •r r~.f~{,~`; ;~i'f ►'A , •~"r'~~ }•1~~ . tt~~~~; i. 1 ' ~ ~ r` 1. ~.ts6.+ ~•'Y.~~►C~'~.. •r "~y 1.t rf'~~1 1 1 _l Y ~ ~►r. >f~~ ~ M~ 1 f ~M I ~ 4 • i~l(~ A 00, ~ yr ~ ''~+r.wh ~,~1~ i;dh ~ ~ ~ r r ' 1y'"~`'t 'i~t ~ ~ iii. ~ u ,~"+-~~y,~'~ ~ ~ ~{lil~l~ : ter ••r."!~ a~f~'• I -,v~~.,.- , I ',7i 1 .r« AT., 'ctf 1i"'"'~f * .y~`'1:1, ~•Ia. -M t1r t ~•.y(~~±1 Inc. ~,.~~~~t. ~ >~'r~'•f Q'_f. - ~G 1' ~ - d ~ •ri. r''.~ ~~fitl S..•.j{t~~ ~+.~~p' J,~~'.~ 4 .y1J R~.,:rt :Ik:rr ~ ~ r3~1f rl 1>,f,,.r d~~ y ~.~'~~r t'~r1'1~ {CL~r1 ~ ~ r -..w..,.. ,w+ 1:.1~ "^c 'f. ~ ~yy"•.~.r•~+1-• rw, .N,r^.~~- .1 ' -,r~'~' r X. ~•`r ♦ .sli. 1 C w. 1~,~it' ~•S.`i~1l. r/~>'~~ H ' ~*~1•~►1 lot- •.~,I.rfii~ t4 - o, _ l trJ ► tirr4'~~'x•fR,(~M'•~ _,~y {~`i.t'w"f(~i•!r~`~"'r:: Iy'%'y~'h'''',r' >t ~llf7Miw'M1~:~I+T>,''IiT~r Ir ~ 1 .7Y!aIy~~N~C~YT. ~lt n/,fr~# ~'c Mr' ~i~~~~~r°..~sa...u~•►•r.~-- = r,~ • w .r.w~w-.~:'~•._a_ s~• A ,off s. T++yysf s a1M M+ ,.v~lli • •~~s.•~ :_`yr•• .T~ . w-•~" » ~.m r ;a... ~ • ° ~ •F~, - _ ~a1 , . ~ ~jr.~ , y,~r dM47914~fTT~ 14 'rf Sri- ,1r►. 1'rli'Y! •;~-•y'•.V -OW rr' i+HCw!t.1~~IF~ 1 M, ~T { 1' -AIL- t . A A-0) Von ...may - - i i c , ! i i S Q► kanE' River to Wandenorere p -M 1 ~ ri l 96 ;Tv u a r ~ r r' - .r f 1 . • t n.• 1% 'Virst 9mdIng project completed in 2002 _ • Nickel Funded work started - - in 2003 .r • Overview I ProJect icke NSC N ~ - • f., . I ► .r r ;"Try • .=-f~. ~ ~ ~ - 1ty '~1. • ~ Jtt ~ ~ r• I is-,' ` • 1 1f _ i i' ~ 1 1 t"Aff Construct 6 projects: 00 .;r-' . • Drivable link between Francis and r~ Wandermere. - r • Estimated total cost is -$190 million. Cost Range in projects is $10 million to $45, million ~ y +P ~ a k n Project 1 = 1~; Farwell Lowering. Farwell Road has been lowered and four bridges are complete for the future US 2 interchange. • ~ r _ ter +r' ,-i . eted ~L'!tT~!•^,'''S ..ate r ~ A; . ~5. Ah, N 1~ • 1 14 r ~ f ~ _ , r . _ ~ • . ~ • ~ Project 2 07' :14 Gerlach to y •:f Wandermere Grading. 1~ 1 ,O'I Ors 1 r, 1, 'r, 6a :y' 7f~N1 ~ r Y -,r•i A , r„ t • ~ 1)~1 ~ • - ws. . I I ~ ` • 1 .ill ` ~b r _ r _ ~s v .~1. L 4.,__ tjw 49 •e~ / ,,Z~~+~1.II+.~ J ♦~1 r ~ 1 ~1~ 1 ~l~ .r •Y ~Y.t~i t ~ l1 l l ~.d r ~ t I w ~'~,~1 f ~•7 I .o. lit t , . 1 I ~ ~ _ ::ter • ~ _ ~ mot:`. ~ ~tr,r~av~► Project k, r f R:y7 Francis Avenue to US Structures y-p r sh a 04 = This contract mill construct bridges between h Road and at4". r_ R - ~z P ~y Y i ^ r Perry Street. T t• y Shady Slope (2), % ParksmIth Perry Market Fairview fit Rebd Awarded, to Max J _ 14 r ~ Kuiiey, July 06 11 I , ~ tl. I ohs. 4 ! 1 ~ M 111. - . l f ► ~ ' Ave to fir!' Fr, P t 4 rojec INC ' J • 1• 1 J f ft yy ► . ,1,,F. Franc venue t US 2 , It ~ 4is This contract w! construct + »,i . } iriveable link from Francis venue to Farwell Road by completing } ~ - arthwor bridges, and paring of the 'northbound lams. 1 ic u.+d in th project i a -1350 foot yyyy1J I ..i,. In railroad tunnel t Winter 20. Plan d AdvertWomen t• lit . 1 J/"M -1t f• rte- - 1 M~j • • .i► ;.'ar ~AfINMICIIttkrir 16 ' , f ' , ` • , ' ► + 1 ■ :,jai f Project 5- US 2 Lowering This contract will lower US 2 between Deadman Creek and Farwell Road and construct the NSC/US 2 Interchange. Planned Construction Start: 2008 Ilk 4b 40 1 .r r_.. Ict r { • . iy~~.•. . 441 i to ;n : - - ear "A r Nf 1 l V-. Project 6 - US 2 to Wandermere This contract will pave the section between US 2 and Wandermere, and construct the US 395 interchange at Wandermere. The contract completes a driveable link between US 395 at Wandermere and Francis Road. Planned Construction Start: 2008 M;'•.;'~ ~ ~ •pv~ J try + _'"'~~/r~rrE"~'t• i A r ~'!1Lti'• .~~j it 7 " . of. 44 Ili, -4 a . " "R 16 O's Aft lop ' ~ ~ "4•"18 14-4 ~ 8 ~ ~ tr • CONSTRUCTION COST INDICES 300- 250- 200- OTHER STATES FHWA COMBINED 150 WSDOT 100 ' 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 YTD WSDOT BASTE IM a 110 yyr~DOT 1001 wpm fg WEIIiHTED AVERAGE OF QUARTERS 1, 2 i y FH`WA OTHTHI AND OTHER STATES BASE 1Y87 ■ 100 OTHER STATES 2006 RMEX 15 AN AVERAGE OF OREGON AND UTAH 1. OER STATES: C/1UfORNA, COLORADO, OREGON. SOUTH DAKOTA a UTAH 2 A 2 OUARTER DATA. Now: 2001 and 1004 WSDOT CCI dam points add od oc conacf for splkio0 bid pdcn on CALIFORNUL COLORADO AND SOUTH DAKOTA 7 QUARTER DATA NOT AVAILABLE sauotunlf swwl FHWA 2006 DATA NOT AVAILABLE- North Spokane Corridor Funding Comparison IL;~ I 1 I Revised Budget `1 f"t (32M+50M) - : D Construction ■ Right O( Way ■ Pieliminary Engineering Otigir" Budget 53,8 Total- $Ise S 12..$ 55C.u $1Ou.0 50.0 $200,0 $250.0 3300.0 DQU4 s in MINJbne 1 1•20-2oco $mb*t to Revision -New History of Public Involvement From 1991 to the present, WSDOT has had over 250 public meetings to seek input and comments on design alternatives: w Open Houses i • Stakeholder Meetings • Agency to Agency meetings • • Neighborhood Groups • Hearings Roadside Development - r r ECN Themes r- ~ 16 T t t r , l 4 I1 Hillyard Themes V ,py'~ ri II Alit- 46 if r i +r►' c it -o s r..r- M WWTr ssOV-"" M-was ito I. n u - u. aaw - ~ 1 I=xm IiQ1/yl~ •IO~~ ~ 'ROW Public Support ■ 1997 - 84% of the public supported the construction of a North Spokane Corridor 10% -Opposed 84% - In Favor 6% - Do Not Know t Risk Items Price,,Esciation Real. Estate Construction Commodities wf ~ i Otis . Questl 'Mm .r , tic. ~ 1 •l~~j~~ = 111 .t ~ 1 ~ Y • .~,,p.( ' 71 http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/projects/US395/NorthSpokaneCorridor/ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Cable Television Public Access Concept: Community-Minded TV GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Federal Cable Act of 1984 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance establishing franchise fee approved 3/31/03; Memorandum of Understanding on terms and conditions to participate in the regional cable advisory board approved 9/16103; Resolution 04-015 Regarding Cable Franchise Renewal Proceedings approved on May 25, 2004. Current Franchise with Comcast extended to March 5, 2007, approved on September 5, 2006. BACKGROUND: Cable franchises and the franchise renewal process are regulated by the federal government. The Cable Act of 1984 allows for both a formal and informal renewal process. The City assumed the County's cable franchise agreement with Comcast upon incorporation. The agreement expires on March 5, 2006. The City is currently in the ascertainment phase of the formal renewal process while continuing -J to negotiate with Comcast informally. The City has the option, under the Federal Cable Act, to have the cable operator reserve cable channels for the purpose of broadcasting locally produced programming, often referred to as public access programming. The City also has the option of obtaining funding from the cable operator for the purpose of paying for capital equipment and improvements used in support of this programming. Comcast will cease to provide a studio and operational support for public access at the end of this year. The public non-profit group Community Minded Enterprises has stepped up with a proposal to provide an outlet to local producers through an alternative to public access, coined Community- Minded Television. This option allows for greater editorial control over programming and focus on broadcasting programming that adds value to the community. The Council may decide, at a future date, if it desires to ask Comcast for capital contributions in support of this endeavor. OPTIONS: Provide feedback to staff and request additional information if desired. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City has budgeted $631,750 in cable franchise fee revenue for 2006. $20,000 has been budgeted for the cable franchise renewal process. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS Proposal for Community Television submitted to the Regional Cable Advisory Board i Community-Minded T Proposal Submitted to the Spokane Cable -Board. for Management of oMmuni f Television Channel 14: November , 2006 Vision and Values 'onzmunhi v-!l idded TV will be a new resource for Spokane, an asset that will be valucd by its- 6 ti-r..ens and a source ofpride for Spokane's leaders. It will emulate the leading-edge examples or community-based T around the country-communities that use the cable franchise to creat(-, a come-itmity asset, a community improvement tool that adds value and becomes a meaningi-ul resource in community members' Ii ves. h-i so doing, it will draw frorn and blend several sources= 1) The hest traditions of community T generally; 2) The best traditions of Spokane Ohanne1 14 and the Spokane Cable Advisory Soard; and 3) The nuis6on and organizational strengths oi' Community-Minded Enterprises. 1) The best traditions of public access TV generally-^T.he key streug hs ofcommunity television tradition are in clusiveness and citizen training. `through this tradition, 110 any who would not otherwise have had an opporWrAy to become involved ii, public conununitalion have developed their skills of public expression and been introduced to the teclmologies of public communication. That enri ches communities, by protecting the diversity of public voices and the patb ways. of }public expression and by ofreri:ng aY enueS oFpersonal and professional development for citizens- Community-Minded T will incorporate a welcornirng approach to diverse citizen producers anii free production training as cornerstones to its servke"_ ! 2 The best traditions of Spokane Channel 1.4-The strengths of Channel 14 are its coitununity producers and volunteers, Some have been consistealtly involved for more than tea years. Same knave recently became involved; having rt-sponded entbUsiasticall to a recent outreach campaign. The, experienced community producers bring Invaluable, (ledicati.on; skill; and a patient and walconiing arti rude to nelxcomcrs who seek to leans the production craft- They form a critical core asset from which to groin the new community resource. The new volunteers bring a» egLmlly inval Liable new tide of eiigagernent and enthus iasni that reaches into Spokane's diverse cultures and neighborhoods. We intend to carefully cultivate these resources and to use the dedication of both groups to gow the volunteer base, 3) Tbc mission and organizational gtren#ths of Community-Mindr-d Enterprises. Our rnission is "to facilitate and enliance community well bei.ng-" We pride ourselves on CADocuinmts and Seuingslcacostall,acal Settiiip\Temporary Internet Filesl0L S90lC TProposal Revised 1 I- 22--06,d ue being a catalyst organization. We focus on the inherent strength of communities--the capacity of communities to come together, to develop local solutions, to build sustainable communities, promote quality of life for community members of all ages and f walks of life. Our strengths come from ten years of enacting our mission in Spokane and Eastern Washington. We are expert conveners and collaborators, expert at listening for and promoting the strengths of individuals and partner organizations. We know this community: we have actively partnered with more than 1200 for-profit, public, and non- profit organizations in the Spokane region on various creative community-improvement initiatives. We have operated a variety of public service information lines in the realms of healthcare access, child care, and access to employment for people with disabilities, through which we have spoken one-on-one with more than 65,000 community members, helping them solve problems related to accessing community resources and improving their lives. We have conducted more than ten different public information campaigns, for one of which we were awarded the single most prestigious national public relations award. Community-'Minded Enterprises has relied largely on its strength in grant-writing to grow from one employee in 1996 to approximately 30 in 2006, and has been primarily responsible for bringing approximately $22 million into the Spokane region from national-level funders to fuel community-improvement initiatives here. Last year, our proposal writers produced 116 proposals. One of our key developmental strategies for Community-Minded TV will be to secure grants that will augment our operational budget and support quality programming and expanded training capacity in our community. We already have grants pending that could contribute to the Community-Minded TV services. The Combination: An Exciting New Chapter for Channel 14. Combining the three strands above sets the stage for an exciting new chapter for Channel 14. Conununity-Minded TV will be devoted to quality programming generated by Spokane community members and designed primarily to improve the fvay our community works. It will help parents learn to be better parents, teachers leans to be better teachers, employers learn to be better employers, neighbors learn to be better neighbors, community leaders learn to be better leaders, and so on. It will offer critical information that makes the connections-a place to go to know more about healthcare and about staying healthy, about child care and about the challenges of raising children when you also have to work, about elder care and solutions for elders seeking quality of life after retirement. It will offer an avenue of connection and cultural welcoming for our growing immigrant populations, a place where they can find programming-acid critical community information-in their native language. It will be a place where all community members can go to feel a sense of belonging to something bigger, something friendly and welcoming, a place that cares about them and welcomes their involvement-a friendly, positive, inclusive, solutions-oriented community. CADocurnents and SettingslcacostalLocal SettingslTemporary Intemet Files10LK8901CMTV Proposal Revised 11- 22--06.doc Solutions-Oriented. This term, solution-orierxte4 deserves special emphasis. There is a tradition across much public service Media tO focus OD problems. Soule of this focus is very responsible, very serious and effective. Nevertheless, it creates a certain expectation that all public service nnedia activity must inevitably involve debate and Controversy and must concentrate on the exposure of what's wrong, We be] ieve that this emphasis has tended to become unbalanced. We believe that it hats led to a lamentable under-focus on the creative solutions that bubble up among profcssiojials and cotrunuility-members alike as they work. every day to build a bettor world- The primary work o 'ommunhty-)Winded T will he to spread the word about Spokane's cominuizL# -hosed saintions. We believe that in dobig Scr, we will contribute an important community service. 0MI 's primary allies in accomplishing this carDin snit -solutions mission will be Spokane's non-profit orgaiiizatioris_ Already legal Iy dedicated to community hnprovernent; inost of: these organi2ations lack the financial wherewithal to tell their story publicly. Most of them have important. public information ajnd inspirational stories to tell that Aoa]d be rcacha.ng more people than they are reaching. These are the naturaI'`first-ticj- producers" for Community- iin.ded TV. However, individual commmunity members will also be key col) tributors, C'0111.munity television must always invite and we,]come diverse voices- Individuals wdI bring ideas for programs; and we it l ,welcome those ideas- In proposing to produce a show, individuals as well as organizational representatives will be asked to meet a standard of production quality- on7c wi11 be asked to meet training or modest apprenticeship requirements before being given responsibility for Glv1iTV equipment. All potential producers will be asked to suggest the community value of their proposed production. We witl take a broad interpretation of the term "cornmuraty value." This is not a strict, dry, dull standard, or ideological standard. It witI blossom with diverse approaches and interpretations, We will be interested in inspiration, in creati vity, in artistry, in fun, in different voices, in differenit styles, in different ,stories. But we will challenge our producers to become part of a television comiriunity dedicated to bailduig a better actual community in Spokane. Proactive, Intentional oPimunity-Minded '.>v'hcme. We have despribed the strengths of the comrmuiity television traditicii. There are also certau7 weaknesses. In.renearching different stations around the ccuntTy, we have found that there is a telidency -for many to be under-funded, to lack the ability or the intention to define a cc m muruty-nAnded theme, and thus to become either I ) a mouthpieQt tot interest groups which dominate tlreir programming; or 2) to attract a grab bag of errant and offensive programming which community members tend to wince over rather than benefit from. {fur search has also revealed that the liaost successful corumLLnity-based programming is not pas i ve; it does not just wait for people to show up and "do whatevor they w,,tnt" with die equipment; rather, it takes a proactive, thcmatiC position, it svf s a shem-ade standard that lilt the community producers to a level of excellence and responsibility in their work- The producers become part ofsometh.ing that matters. They aren't just dabbling; they arc chat lenged to make a difference. T11.1 s is the approach Community-Minded Fneterprises uitends to take with onunuiuty-Minded TV. )editorial Content C'.ootro1. Supported by the legal analysis by the City attorney, Corn munity- T.inded Enterprises will assume editurial content control over what is broadcast on luumel 1. 4, l ~ C:1DocitinnnLs and Settings~cacosralLacal e[[ingslTernporary In[eraet Pil es1Q LK890UMTV Prnposa I Revised l 22--06.doc Channel 14 will not be presented as a public access channel. It will not function as a public access forum, open to whatever voices choose to use it. It will function under the framework of community value as defined above and as f=urther defined by the CMTV Planning Board over tune. CMTV staff will be responsible for screening all programming for content as well as for production quality before it is broadcast. No favoritism will occur in relation to viewpoint of programming. Production Production Nvill occur on a series of "tiers," ranked below in order of resource intensity (or cost) needed: 1) rive programs broadcast from the KSPS studio 2) Original programming produced digitally by CMTV paid production team 3) Original programming produced digitally by non-profit organizations (or schools, etc.) or individuals with. active support of CMTV paid production team 4) Original programming produced digitally by non-profits or individuals with CMTV equipment with pre-training by paid CMTV staff 5) Solicited original programming produced digitally by non-profit organizations, etc., or individuals with active support of CM TV volunteers 6) Unsolicited original progranmzing produced digitally by non-profits, etc., or individuals with CMTV equipment with active support of CMTV volunteers. 7) Produced digitally by non-profits or individuals with CMTV equipment with pre-training by CMTV volunteers 8) Unsolicited submissions in various formats by connrnunity members. 9) Community-solutions oriented program-wing available for low- or no-cost in the public domain or made available by donation. The mix of the above will be determined by the availability of quality volunteer-generated programming (and availability of volunteers), the amount of operational budget, the programming priorities as defined by the Planning Board, the availability of quality, theme- appropriate material at the lower-cost level, etc., etc. In addition, the CMTV paid production team will also do some fee-for-service work for public sector organizations in a way that does not compete with private sector production services. The revenue from this fee-for-service work will augment the operational budget of Community- Minded TV, to be re-invested in its community-service activities. Following the example of the most robust stations around the country, Community-Minded Enterprises will seek to bring in grant funds to augment the capacity of CMTV. These funds will most likely support particular kinds of programming, for example: programming that highlights issues around early learning; programming that supports acculturation of immigrant populations; programming that meets the needs of elderly people living alone; prograning that explores regional ecological sustainability. We will also target funds that will allow us to expand the training capacity of CMTV, that supports outreach to underserved populations, and that supports the expansion of CMTV into other digital 6ormats. CADocuments and SettingslcacosuALocal Settings\Te.mporary Internet Fi1es10LK8901CviTV Proposal Revised 1 i- 22--06.doc To begin with, we envision the potential of a paid staff of three, augmented by part-time support from OAS's grant-writing team. The lead staff will be a coordinator who oversees the CMTV operation, coordinates the interface with the public, the producers, the fee-for-service clients and prospective clients, the board, the City, and the volunteers. This person will report to the CIVIE Executive Director (who will retain some implementation responsibilities, especially in years one and two). He/she will be a great listener and collaborator and will live and breathe the vision of Community-Minded TV. The other two staff will be video and editing professionals who N«ll comprise the technical production team. The paid staff will be augmented by a large contingent of interns, work-studies, and skilled volunteers-as well as unskilled volunteers whose training is part of CMTV's services-all of whom will significantly augment CMTV's productivity. It is possible, depending upon our success in securing an ample operational budget in years one and two, that we will phase in these staff positions over the first year. Headquarters will be at the new Saranac Building, due to open in May, 2007, on Main Street between Division and Browne-an expansion of the Community Building non-profit center. Community-Minded Enterprises will be the largest non-profit in that complex. Because of the large concentration of diverse non-profits there, covering arts, environmental, and social service, we anticipate that the Commrui-ity-Building/Saranac complex will function as a downtown community center and a perfect setting for Community-Minded TV. The downtown hub will be a place to receive training, hold meetings, check out equipment, and edit programs. It will house a small studio appropriate. for simple production needs. In addition, as needed, and as programming priorities demand, the sophisticated KSPS South Hill full production studio will be available for use by Community-Minded TV. However, a great majority of programming will be done "in the field," with mobile digital video, to be edited at the Saranac (or on community members' editing facilities). Tn terms of equipment, then, CMTV will invest primarily in the mobile, portable state-of-the-art equipment that lends itself to easy set-up and removal, that produces the highest quality audio and video that will not have to be immediately replaced as digital technology progresses, and that offers community participants a realistic exposure to state-of-the-art digital production technology. At this writing, we are anticipating purchasing three-to-five mobile units complemented by three-to-five office-based editing suites. The mobile units would span different levels of quality / cost, with approximately two at HD level. Further capital expenditures will go toward the build-out of the CMTV offices at the Saranac, including a major meeting room which will involve high-tech. digital linkages to other sources of community-solutions programming and conferences that will support CMTV production planning for community producers and collaborative grant writing with community partners. If, over time, the budget allows, a small van to transport equipment around town may be a possibility. Distribution. Distribution will occur via KSPS as part of its overall PEG distribution services. CMTV will hand off finished programming to KSPS staff to be aired through the KSPS distribution technology. This distribution support will involve a half-time staff effort at KSPS. C Tocuments and Settingskacosta\Local Settings\Temporaq Internet Files\OLK3901CMTV Proposal Revised 1I- 22--06.doc Outreach. Outreach wi11 be critical to (:MTV's success- Again here. the lesson, aroLLnd the country t--l! us that lack of effecti ve outreach equate to loss of identity for conunuiuty-based TV, with the result being inconsistent or one-sided programming. Here the organ zatiorial strength of omnlunity- Minded Enterprises wi11 be helpful: we do bave a robust distribution infrastructure across the institutional infrastructure in Spokane, especially Ni the non-profit world, We have also conducted many public inkrrnation campaigns and understand hove to engage donated public ccmmunication support for community-improvement activities. We will use all our connections and ingenuity-as well as some strategic use of our budget-to spread the wore] about orm„unity-Minded T -especially it]r the purpose of engaging new Voluritcer producers and new conununity-minded programming. Partner organizations i II play a key role in outreach- Community ce. Wys, neighborhood development organizations, employment support organizations, high schools, and higher cd IDsti tutions are natural allies in that their m)ssions wi11 overlap wi th MTV These organizations will act as outTeacb stations and funnels for programming and volunteers, By providing basic infoiunation and working with leadership in these organizations (relationships are already well established in most cases), we believe that we call start the outreach engines without an excessive outlay of budget dol.Ws- Volunteer outreach activities will be part of the mix, as well, and of course, the 6aixnel itself, as the new programming begins to unfold, ill ultimately be the best outreach tool, - Planning The governance decisions regarding editor1al control, theme, acid direction, progranurnii acid major budgeting priorities; wi11 be made b the om.manity-Minded TV Planning Board, which wi11 function legal ly a,id structurally as a subcommittee of the, Board of Trustees of Community- Minded Enterprises, This Planning Board will consist of approximate]} eight to ten individuals , at leL,~t four of whom will be members of the ME, board. Other members will be. selected by the i board with input f-om the CME start and the Cable Advisory Board, and with an eye toward broad community a-epre5enta6on and experience 2uld insight with media and community inclusiveness. This Planning Board will meet monthly a+1d guide the work of the CM TV staff. The early .month; of 2007 will be devoted to 1) maintaining prograainih on Channel 14; ) maintaining continuity with existing producers; and 3) laying the groundwork for a strong and sustainable launch of. Community-Minded TV in the late spring. Budget The primary budgetary challenge is to establish an operational budget that can carry the vision and purposes described in this proposal. It is not realistic to describe a mobilizing new vision for Community-Minded T without a solid strategy for funding the implementation of that vision. CADocurnents aitid SettingslcacostaEocaI Setd1igslTernparary Iimimet FileslDT-K8901CENITV Proposal Revised I i- 22--06,d o c The initial capital equipment grant from the City of Spokane and the yearly additional grants act as cornerstones. But they w711 not suffice. CME believes that there is a reasonable possibility that the County and/or the City of Spokane Valley may join the City of Spokane in seeking the subscriber fee and in contracting for Community-Minded TV. We are currently pursuing these relationships. These additional commitments would add strong further cornerstones to anchor the vision. But they are not assured. Indeed, the full long-tenn funding strategy rests squarely upon Community-Nffiided Enterprises' track record of success in grant writing. If we had not already brought in $22 million in grant funds into this region; if we had not built grant-%vriting as a core staff competency, with 18 staff members currently participating in developing proposals; if we had not produced 116 proposals last year, we would not be advancing the Cormnunity-Minded TV vision. Because this vision is directly connected to community benefit and because it will also provide two corollary benefits in the form of free information technology training for disadvantaged youth and free digital public education products for non-profit agencies, we believe there is powerful potential for grant funding. We are being conservative in waiting until year three to project budgetary grant revenue. We will make grant-writing a key aspect of the developmental strategy starting in year one. In addition, the digital revolution makes digital production services a growth industry and makes the development of fee-for-service revenue an important aspect of our revenue strategy. 0 Community-Minded Enterprises also has a track record in this regard, having earned close to $500,000 in fee-for service profit margin for contractual services related to our core organizational competencies, revenue which we have channeled in service to our non-profit mission. Thus, we are skilled and experienced in both the grant and fee-for-service forms of non- profit financing and have the infrastructure and competencies in place that give us reason to anticipate success. Thus, by year three, we project the ability to add $150,000 in grant revenue to our operational budget and $50,000 in profit margin to our initial fee-for-service contracts. And we project reasonable growth in those numbers in the years following. Ovemiew of the First Years We will enter year one assured of the ability to launch an effective chatuiel, but uncertain as to how quickly to expand. That ttncertainty will rest in the fact that many proposals-most significantly proposals before the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County-but also a number of fee-for-service proposals-will probably still be pending. Because the year one grants from the City of Spokane and possibly from the Valley and/or the Comity will probably be higher than in subsequent years, we will face the challenge of guarding against the possibility of a leaner year two. Thus, it will be important to build a steady and gradual start-up plan, not one that is overly aggressive and then discovers that it has to retreat because of diminishing revenues in Year Two. CADocunients and Settingslcacosta\Local SettingslTemporary Internet Files\OLK8901CM'rV Proposal Revised 1I- 22--06.doc Calibrating the pace of development will depend upon three factors: 1) Success in engaging the - County and the City of Spokane Valley; 2) Success in securing fee-for-service revenue; and, 3) success in grant writing. It will be critical to invest some staff' resources early on in these endeavors in order to secure the gradual growth of revenue that will sustain CMTV into the future. Year One.. It is unseasonable to expect a full year of robust programming if the new station is just born on Jan. 1, 2007. Hiring stafwill take time; so will initial outreach activities. Other than maintaining some continuity with existing Channel 14 programming and ramping up with infrastructure and planning systems, there will not be much public "splash" for CMTV until approx. May, 2007. The ramp-up period will tend to cost less operationally: thus, some savings overall in year one operational costs. In addition, the City's anticipated $50,000 potential waiver of capital expenditure responsibility will be a critical priority for years one through three each to help stabilize the launch of CM1'V. And CME has negotiated an arrangement with the Saranac management which will allow us to transition capital expenditures into operational revenue. Thus, ample 2007 revenue will be available for the operational needs of the launch. We project $30,000 in year one fee-for-service margin, and that brings our projected operational budget total for year one to $180,000, which, given a short operational year, and reserving a portion for the possible leaner revenue of year two, makes for an effective start. Year One Revenue and Expense Projections Expenses Capital Costs: Offices: $.180,000 Build out and Development of 4tb floor once, Saranac: -Reception area, equipment storage area, studio, editing area, coordinator's office Build out and Development of 3`d floor meeting room and 3`d floor editing room, Saranac: -interactive screening/editing/training capacity, collapsible comununity conference table, individualized computer classroom training capacity Capital Costs: Equipment: $75,000 Two Dieital Field Units and Accessories Two HD Digital Field Units and Accessories Hour Editing Suites and Accessories Staffing: $120,000 Executive Director .2 l~TE Coordinator 1 FTE (10 months) \ 2 video/edit tech 2 FTE (8 mos; 6 mos.) C:\Doc.uments and Settings\eacosta\Loeal Seningsvrernporary Internet Fi1esk0LK890\CMTV Proposal Revised 1 1- 22--06.doc Administration, Rent, Etc.: $60,000 2007 TOTAL EXPENSES: $435,000 2007 Projected .revenue Jan 1, 2007: City Allocation (for Capital Expenditures): $150,000 City Allocation (allowable for Operational Expenditures): $50,000 Saranac Operational Offset: $165,000 Possible Revenue: March, 2007: County or Valley participation: $100,000 (for Capital Expenditures) June, 2007: Fee-for-service profit margin: $10,000 December, 2007: Fee-for-service profit margin: $20,000 Hove to new offices in the Saranac Building in 1llay, 2007. Special arrangement with the Saranac management allowsforfleribility in.accessing operational dollars in 2007. i 2007 TOTAL. PROTECTED REVENUE: S495,000 ($60,000 Carried Over to 2008) C:117ocuments and SetdngslcacostalLocal SettinasWemporary Internet Files\OLKS901CMTV Proposal Revised 1I- 22--06.doc CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 11-28-06 City Manager Sign-off. Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information x admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Grant Recommendations GOVTRNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 82.08 RCW Imposition of tax on the furnishing of lodging and allowable uses PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: In previous years, the City was very conservative in their estimation of lodging; tzx revenues and expenditures. Because of these projections and because some of the awards made have not been used, we are projecting a carry over of $280,000 at the end 2006, and revenues for 2007 of approximately S350,000. After lengthy review, the committee recommends the following 2007 room tax allocations for council review. Spokane County Fair & Expo Center $ 20,000 Spokane Reg. Convention/Visitors Bureau $175,000 Spokane Reg. Sports Commission $100,000 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum $ 10,000 Valleyfest $ 25,000 Six Bridges Arts Assn. S 12,500 CenterPlace S 40,000 Total $ 382,500 OPTIONS: The committee also indicated they would be interested in reviewing; additional proposals for tourism promotion in May of 2007. It was pointed out that since room tax can only be used for tourism promotion, it makes little sense to save these dollars, rather than putting them to use in marketing and promotion of tourism. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to place this item on the next council agenda for motion consideration. BUDGFT/FINANCtAL IMPACTS: allocations are within the budget limits STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director Charlie Pflieg;er, Accountant/Budget Analyst % City of Spokane Valley Lodging Tax Advisory Committee A inutes of a Meeting Held November 6, 2006 The meeting was called to order by Steve Taylor at 5:35 p.m. In attendance were Steve `Taylor, Diana Wilhite, Liz Beck, Brenan Genther, Peggy Doering, Mike Conway and Ken Thompson. Committee members discussed each proposal for use of city room tax and how each proposal might promote tourism. It was noted that promotion of tourism is more than renting hotel rooms. Discussion took place on retail sales, restaurant traffic and fuel sales generated by tourism. After lengthy review, the committee agreed to recommend the following 2007 room tax allocations to the city council for approval: Spokane County Fair & Expo Center $20,000 Spokane Reg. Convention/Visitors Bureau $175,000 Spokane Ref;. Sports Commission $100,000 Spokane Valley Heritage Museum $10,000 ~ f. 1 Valley"est $25,000 Six Bridges Arts Assn. $12,500 CenterPlace $40,000 Total $382,500 The committee directed that room tax allocated for the Heritage Museum be used for creation and distribution of card rack materials. The committee also indicated they Would he interested in reviewing additional proposals for tourism promotion in May of 2007. It was pointed out that since room tax can only be used for tourism promotion, it makes little sense to save these dollars, rather than putting thorn to use in marketing and promotion of tourism. There being no further business Chairman Taylor adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Ken Thompson ;,oWV91ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhattr-S)spokanevatley.org Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: November 13, 2006 Re: October Monthly Report During October, finance employees worked on the folloAing projects: 2007 Budget reparation Finishing touches on the 2007 Budget kept the Finance Division busy during October. The city council identified 2007 allocations for outside agencies and staff updated the 2007 budget. The council directed staff to place $21,000 for a site locator service, as a place holder in the 2007 budget pending further discussion. The budget was also updated with Stre et Fund Expenditure totals based on a council decision to postpone the fluid de[icit until 2010. Spokane County's projected 15% increase in assessed value appeared likely as the latest county estimates resulted in a $5.9 billion assessed value total for the City of Spokane Valley. The budget process will conclude in November with the adoption of the 2007 budget. Budget variance/investment reports Reports showing a comparison of revenues and expenditures, to our 2006 budget, at October 31, 2006 are attached. Staff provides information on all funds quarterly but only on selected operating funds at the end of other months. If revenues and expenditures flowed to/from the City evenly throughout the year, we would expect both revenues and expenditures to show about 83% realized at October 31. Revenues and expenditures do not flow evenly throughout the year, so some distortion is present in almost every monthly report. Expenditures are beginning to approach budget limits in several finds. Finance will be monitoring these accounts. A comparison of significant 2006 General Fund revenue to 2005 revenue indicates: - +Sales tax is up $1,354,000 +Recreation fees are up $300,000+ because Centerplace revenue is exceeding our expectations. However, 2007 fees will be allocated to that year when we close our books at 12-31-06. +Investme.nt income is up $156,000 (more cash on hand and increased interest rates) +Planning/Building fees are down $455,000 from 2005, but slightly ahead of our most recent 2006 budget projections The investment report is also attached for your review. Amendments to the 2006 budget The following amendments were identified for the 2006 budget: +Update budget for street construction standards +Appropriate for interest on an interfund loan to the Block Grant Fund +Include potential settle and adjust costs for Public Safety +Budget for transfer to the Civic Facilities Fund +Include costs .for planning sub-area plan for 2006 +Payment to library district for their share of delinquent property tax +Include flashing school signal grant in budget Distribution of the annual financial report The annual financial report is being prepared for distribution to bankers, bond underwriters, bond cotmsel, national bond clearing houses and bond buyers. Approximately 30 copies are mailed annually to those with an interest in our bonds. T odgin_ committee proposal for allocation of room tax The lodging committee met and heard proposals for use of room tax for tourism promotion. A proposed listing of allocations was prepared for city council review on November 2$. Closing of the books for year ending 12-31-06 Finance employees are preparing a year-end work plan to close the city's financial records. This process takes three to four months and involves gathering transactions so that 2006 income is matched against 2006 expenditures. There are many national and state rules/regulations on how these entries are to be handled. City of Spokane Valley ' Selected Operating Funds Budget Variance Report Year to Date at October 31, 2006 Amended Budget October YTD Unrealized Percent 34Q~i Revenues Revenues Revenu_e_ Realized General Fund Revenues: Unrestricted Fund Balance S 1,022,575 $ - S - $ 1,022,575 0.00% Property Tax 8,281,000 137,806 4,543,271 3,737,729 54.86% 1 Sates Tax 16,900,000 1,671,553 13,824,637 2,975,363 82.29 Gambling Tax 910,000 78,314 567,334 342,666 62.34 2 Leasehold Excise Tax 2,500 200 7,255 (4,755) 290.20 4 Franchise Fees/Business Licenses 681,750 198,265 620,669 61,081 91.04 2 State Shared Revenues 1,121,000 156,092 855,879 265,121 76.35 Planning & Building Fees 1,685,000 264,862 1,753,655 (68,655) 104.07 4 Fines and Forfeitures 1,250,000 106,394 1,005,627 244,373 80.45 Recreation Program Fees 385,516 33,011 605,747 (220,231) 157.13 8 Investment Interest 231,300 27,137 326,990 (95,550) 141.33 4 Operating Transfers 40,000 - 64,300 (24,300) 160.75 3 General Fund $ 32,410,641 S 2,673,634 $ 24,175,264 S 8,235,377 74.59% Other Fund Revenues: Street Fund S 4,166,856 S 209,120 S 3,281,128 $ 885,728 78.74% Holel/Motel Fund 400,667 51,864 325,336 75,331 81.20 Stormwater Fund 1,621,534 19,519 939,166 682,368 57.92 1 Other Funds $ 6,189,057 $ 280,503 S 4 545 630 S 1,643 427 73,45% Amended Budget October YTO Unrealized Percent 2006 ,penditures Expenditures Ex Pr ej]r,itures Realized General Fund Expenditures: Legislative Branch S 304,267 $ 8,640 S 162,582 $ 141,685 53.43% Executive & Legislative Support 470,105 32,786 323,212 146,893 68.75 Public Safety 17,173,541 1,445,804 13,973,333 3,200,208 8137 Operations & Administrative Svcs 1,4611,170 110,824 1,086,442 374,728 74.35 Pubfic Works 980,192 75,204 712,312 267,880 72.67 Planning & Community Dev. 2,236,700 143,217 1,462,918 773,782 65.41 Library Services - - 62,597 (62,597) - 9 Parks & Recreation 1,854,666 80,786 1,345,156 509,510 72.53 General Government 7,930,000 122,975 5,682,787 2,247,213 71.66 5 S 32,410,641 $ 1,980,136 S 24 811 339 S 7,599,302 76.55% Other Fund Expenditures: Street Fund $ 4,166,856 $ 98,250 $ 2,524,094 S 1,642,762 60.58% Hotel/Motel Fund 400,667 32,701 187,895 212,772 46.90 6 Stormwater Fund 1,621,534 68,827 878,132 743,402 54.15 S 6,189,057 S 199,778 $ 3,590,11211 $ 2,598,936 58.01% 1111512006 i:50 KA City of Spokane Valley Investment Rep Dirt For the Month October 2006 Total L IP* F&M MM Investments Beginning 26,743,196,34 $ 1,554,745.71 28,297,943.05 Deposits 2,075,567,25 - 2,075,567.25 WithdrawI5 (2,840,000.00) - (2,800,000.00) Interest 111,301.77 614.22 116,915.99 Ending 25,130,065-36 1,560,360-93 27 690,426.29 Balances bV Fund General Fund 5,158,311-24 Street Fund 4,670,807.56 Arterial Street 873,989.42 Paths & Trails 16,146.68 HctelfMotel 387,785.17 Center PI8ce Op 318,558.60 Service Level Stab. 4,580,645.47 Winter Weather Res. 528,251.84 Capital Projects 3,226,260-25 Spec, Capital Proj- 3,240,029-56 Street Capital Proj. - Mirabeaa Point Proj. 373,207,19 Street Band Proj, 611,799,07 Parks Capital Proj. 1,1148,644-93 Civic Bldg. Cap. Proj. 479,016-72 tormwater Mgrnt- 1,287,139.51 Equipment Rental 788,205,87 Risk Management 21,627.21 27,690,425.29 `Local Government Investment Pool FOOTNOTES Note: 1 Revenue from property taxes is received in May and November 2 Received quarterly but not in calendar quarters 3 Internal transfer is made quarterly 4 City estimate was too low 5 70% of this budget is reserves. Emergency use only 6 Requests for reimbursement are light in early months 7 Tax levied in prior yrs for library, paid in 2006 8 Some of these revenues will be recorded in 2007 books 9 Library's share of delinq. Tax from prior yrs will be paid to library MEMO TO: Dave Mercier, City Manager FROM: Cal Walker, Chief of Police George Wigen, Administrative Serguint DA'Z'E: November 20, 2006 TIE: Montbly Report October 2006 Attached is the activity report for October 2006 for the Spokane Valley Police Department. Computer-aided dispatch (CAT)) incidents totaled 4,733. These are self initiated officer contacts, as well as calls for service. Out of those incidents, 1,449 actual reports were taken during the month of October. Attached is the breakdown describing those incidents. Additionally, there were 1,579 traffic stops conducted that resulted in 299 traffic reports. included are the hotspot maps for October residential burglaries, October commercial burglaries and October traffic collisions, along with September & October stolen vehicles. ADMINISTRATIVE: During the month of October, Chief Walker: ♦ Attended the annual Appreciation Banquet sponsored by the Spokane County Sheriffs Office and S.C.O.P.E. ♦ Participated in the annual Hope House Celebrity Fashion Show. ♦ Announced his intent to retire from the Spokane County Sheriff's Office. COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: ♦ Annual Awards Banquet held More than 450 people were in attendance at the Spokane County Sheriffs Office and Sheriff' Community Oriented -Policing Effort (S.C.O.P.F.) annual Appreciation Banquet on October 10 at the Northern Quest Casino. Awards and certi fates of commendation Nvcre presented by the Sheriff's Office to "Outstanding Citizens" and to Sheriff's employees, and S.C.O.P.E. recognized "Outstanding Volunteers" and various supportive businesses. ♦ Special Olympics (Fundraiser A Success More than $13,000 was raised for Special Olympics of Washington as area law enforcement officers and deputies helped wait tables at the three Spokane County Red Robin restaurants as part of `rip A Cop 2006. Spokane Comity Sheriff's patrol and jail deputies worked from noon to 8 p.m. at the Spokane Valley Red Tobin, and they raised more money in donations than last year. Page 1 ♦ Happy Birthday To Edgecliff! Edgecliff S.C.O.P.E., the Spokane County Sheriffs Office first community-oriented neighborhood crime prevention effort, celebrated its 10 Year Anniversary this month and the community was invited to a birthday party to help its members celebrate. The party was held at the Pratt Elementary Gymnasium, 6903 E. Fourth in Spokane Valley. S.C.O.P.E. is the Sheriff's Community Oriented Policing Effort, a crime prevention initiative that partners residents, businesses and law enforcement to reduce and prevent crime in Spokane County neighborhoods. Jeff McCullough spoke about the birth of the program, Sgt. Steve Barbieri discussed growing pains, and Rick Scott highlighted the now-mature crime prevention program. As a property crimes investigator, Barbieri was the first sheriffs detective assigned to the Edgecliff S.C.O.P.E. station. His efforts, coupled with those of the early citizen organizers and patrol officers assigned to the area, were credited with reducing burglary in the Edgecliff neighborhood by about 40 percent. Those early successes led to the sheriff s office establishing 15 other neighborhood S.C.O.P.E. stations. ♦ S.C.O.P.E. Out S.C.O.P.E., Ill The Kids Volunteers conducted Operation Family ID for two hours on October 25 as part of an information session explaining the S.C.O.P.E. and Neighborhood Watch programs. Operation Family ID is but one of the many community safety programs offered by S.C.O.P.E., the Sheriffs Community Oriented Policing Effort. Residents had digital pictures taken of their children, and the photos and other identifiers were put on a disk that the parents kept. That disk can be provided to law enforcement should the child ever go missing. Operation Family ID could be especially important to someone in light of the approaching holiday activities. Should a child disappear, law enforcement would be able to provide the current picture to media and volunteer searchers, increasing the chance that the child would be successfully located. There was no cost to Operation Family ID participants. The session was held at Centerplace, 2426 N, Discovery Place. OPERATIONS: ♦ Sixteen-Year-Old Faces Vieth Charge A 16-year-old Spokane Valley High School student was arrested shortly after a School Resource Officer caught him smoking methamphetamine behind an East Trent convenience store. West Valley School Resource Officer Damon Simmons was flagged over by a citizen who reported that a juvenile male was smoking drugs behind the Exxon Station at Trent and Vista. Simmons walked behind the store and saw and heard the male student inhaling meth through a glass drug pipe. The teen also had a glass vial containing a small quantity of methamphetamine in his pocket. The SRO arrested the teen and drove him to Spokane County Juvenile Detention, where he booked him on a felony count of Possession of Controlled Substance. ♦ Crash Closes Valley Arterial A two-car crash closed Mission Avenue at Pines for nearly three hours and sent a Spokane Valley Police traffic officer to the hospital with back pain. Officer Joe Bonin was headed _ east on Mission in the inside of the two eastbound lanes about 12:55 p.m. when the collision occurred. A Kia Sportage driven by a 25-year-old male pulled out from a parking Page 2 lot through a gap left by traffic stopped in the outside lane, directly in front of Officer -1 Bonin's Police Interceptor. The officer was unable to stop and t-boned the Sportage, L~ knocking it onto its side. Reports by officers at the scene indicated neither the male driver nor his passenger was seriously injured. ♦ Drug Unit Harvests Valley Dope Grow Investigators assigned to the sheriffs Investigative Support Unit raided a Spokane Valley residence Tuesday morning and seized 14 mature marijuana plants growing in the basement of the home. Afterward, detectives went to the location where the 50-year-old male suspect was employed and arrested him on a felony count of 'Manufacturing a Controlled Substance, booking him into the Spokane County Jail. Detectives began an investigation into the situation after receiving a tip regarding the basement dope-growing operation. Two detectives visited the home and could smell the pungent odor of marijuana emanating from the house. An ISU spokesman said the marijuana was being grown in dirt rather than in water (hydroponically), and were "nice mature plants." ♦ Gang ream Arrests Taggers Two University High School students have been arrested for 18 incidents of graffiti in the Spokane Valley. The students, both 14-year-old boys, spray-painted initials, slogans and other images primarily in the University area of Spokane Valley. However, one tagged the inside of Valley Hospital where he had gone for treatment of an injury. The Spokane Gang Enforcement Team (GET) began looking at the graffiti to determine if it had gang-related significance. It was deemed vandalism rather that gang graffiti, but GET members identified the two suspects early on and concluded the investigation with the arrests of both for Second Degree Malicious Mischief, a felony. The Spokane Gang Enforcement Team is comprised of investigators from the Spokane Valley Police Department, Spokane County Sheriff's Office, Spokane Police Department, Department of Corrections, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Sheriffs School Resource Officer Jeff Duncan is assigned to University High School and assisted GET with the investigation. SCOOTERS AND 13IIES: ♦ On. October 18 a collision occurred between a pedal-bike and an auto. The pedal-bike was traveling east bound on the west bound sidewalk of Sprague in the East 12800 block. A vehicle attempted to exit a parking lot and the bike struck the side of the auto. The bike rider was not wearing a helmet and suffered minor injuries. Page 3 2006 OCTOBER CRIME REPORT - Oct-06 Oct-05 2006 to date 2005 to date 2005 Total 2004 Total BURGLARY 65 61 602 646 744 997 FORGERY 18 50 276 407 464 465 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 77 73 964 791 904 1,224 NON-CRIMINAL 97 72 679 627 749 916 PROPERTY OTHER 86 79 843 987 1,154 1,665 RECOVERED VEHICLES 30 34 303 274 333 390 STOLEN VEHICLES 67 63 548 470 603 577 THEFT 160 205 1,554 1,925 2,256 2,853 UIOBC 0 1 7 7 8 10 VEHICLE OTHER 0 0 3 5 5 40 VEHICLE PROWLING 82 93 794 794 958 1,382 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 682 731 6,573 6,933 8,178 10,519 ASSAULT 61 76 699 738 894 880 DOA/SUICIDE 11 16 136 127 159 164 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 80 52 589 662 762 755 HOMICIDE 0 0 5 0 1 5 KIDNAP 0 4 19 31 35 24 MENTAL 26 44 357 375 425 386 MP 10 6 76 77 97 106 PERSONS OTHER 117 98 980 1,064 1,256 1,624 ROBBERY 8 7 46 46 56 58 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 7 5 68 84 92 190 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 320 308 2,975 3,204 3,777 4,192 ADULT RAPE 2 2 23 33 39 37 CHILD ABUSE 8 9 66 86 101 126 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 8 6 89 66 88, 205 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 1 2 4 6 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 0 0 12 7 9 21 CHILD MOLESTATION 10 8 57 57 67 77 CHILD RAPE 1 2 50 31 35 30 RUNAWAY 34 27 267 264 311 437 SEX OTHER 15 19 172 146 181 162 STALKING 1 1 15 27 27 35 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 13 21 154 224 244 341 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 92 96 907 948 1,108 1,475 DRUG 56 84 561 744 891 999 ISU OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 1 TOTAL ISU 56 84 561 744 891 1,000 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 299 219, 2,750 1,913 2,403 2,776 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,449 1,438 13,766 13,742 16,357 1 9,962 Glurr%!n `Li - la~! RLd 011 I F01t, cs' v _ ,Eon f 7D I Sonuaa -Crown C. W a Pnnt" • iixt►a.: n a a gpnn y r i- ! 1~'r~ 9 Rrct1 - m_ T R_ v 13 9 L. - p I N _Rkn- _ II d Kls ! z;, i 0 14 m-c rrelU IN ,qd o I ~ - - f 10 ` -o Euc11~d 4 _ a y' (rtDGL r M r rnu - - - # bu:k d 6 it Ue.11 M e11 ~`-c~5 `Yt. FL ontk ~.ar1:~c Carlsie z _ - K 2 ~ r;iann a - . ~ r ~ y IJOra 0 IndL4r Id E ~ ' L-"-,-,.r.~ , J•,,=~` 1°31 ' t: r. - •=!'-jz' - ~ ..~9J ~ } ~.,i5_ - _ -190 1 N[tt!e fir,` siorl Ma,, ,,nto 1 NMseion ~~i- 1- Gala 1.1.55n)t _ r $6L1L t L goon _ r C 1 _ Sharp i - Atk.1 R...ne m ti. VA110-1 - . -Iftan Ai AA1kI -90, 13tond*ay C iy ~r rauti c r : _ - - Jt1k A1A1 ulnta = - ;n. rrinat 61h tn Rr. - ~1 ' Alpm Card 151 r_ - ~ ~ - r ~ 61fi 4 X114 6111 -RTh _gta: 1 : 7th - dth N eR. R - t' 70th'h - F'rH7l z itiUt t p lath - ta.. 16M_ .17th- 76th r 31f71h:0th 41 J, . /j41h tax =_fmt - - 1 rm Iray I C _ 27th b' p s 2751 }ennio t' ~r;.t, * R 1Nln.~ ~C^ s; ~b - " 3 i t i. ~ Q pl U1 _ - = nr1 4 tri I a 251h _ 70 -SEa. 11 r i t tr " = - 7 IN 111 thl r ! GL 35 38 31st 4 a51h o si I'r 3gtft 39th ~ u y Y - rV36th 4rnt. Bel%I I Y '10, T- { 9 1 it % Bell ' Stolen 44th - v.hlcfe 41 s', - i - dih Yy ~`s 46th $ ~1 d3 c ° 440 46 l7d '~A~~, Aunme A LOLI 101 ASth ~w 9 _ g- sI CL n s~ 5 =Medium Ger,.•t.t IF, Lr c. 7 {oc~ tea; , r„a. n r - 111111111111Hh R i5Fi1r - 2006 September & October Stolen Vehicle Hotspots Map Produced 6 November 2006 r . 7 -,dP' Fled DA :r FrOFf a3a c ` JCtSe I/. b,a 70 aon60n -Crown 3 x a -2 ydatlBrteY._` _ ~ I-.~.. ~ ~ rr~ III ~ a p L n SV slab a -YI = Illeh ~fl. - - -n _ V y t: c c r- c -~hwoj ~ Nick-- L aros:c ~Aa J - - Kle on ' o rz- Or m .c Bunk a I bl t_n , - - Fa,r'(;O c - - r F{ orWA ~~fiFain&' 141e ~f!' utNeyrs "X gar" n C 1574 a Y n indiant1_--- T c+ I r Q. _ '~Ot i O r Indiana v Eli E tt 7 IN C pa , - Isslon „r~ r .4 Mission m - Cato 4 9", 4 IIosmel 3 h1i pido ra. r _ _ - 55,On 15 ~altitc.- Stuu{. I ~t1>3up Brurno }31)V nr~ Sharp • . _ - _ ~4.. - A11.1 1 (.tatitx, 5tiwFiali7 vi' a t~ 31 Dean { Broadway - - c n wr,y Nipin 1.1 IUhI A n ' a 5 Z ru - -X aul lOl,w, _ - - - - Kr..,rbttla $ -,H 'rl~n9 ~T1 Std411111, i L 4H 6th g n I Mill In s 15i AWPT, a- - h 6th a 8~ i FIfit Zed JRt 2n4 - .,,I III 71:'1 v Flh lat-r .w r _ 7Y 6th 51b~ 7th a y ti lin la t-' 1Jlt, %r r1U, _ .,Ill 1Gih °-th 0 11th', 6th o -o 0 11m t~ x iF y }:G7rl ~1oC 11th I t itt ' 1~ a v Matt j _ 15th t6tD ' - ~ 7 r 16th t7 18t11 - a G tt _ ::zit. loth 2 h. a, . Mtn ti~ - 16tH t"4th' w :dam 19n t+Ih pax c 'Gth 4 r 4 23'V 22nd $ .24th - - li _Y C IIYd c .5th 2W t 19th _ x I'`'v z: ?~tI' 27u, 13 34tH J Gy 21st ,enn,e view 28th n, CD 7 3 K a - 3 25tht 31 F.1 ro }1S-r - 2xtn W _ Fi $ I 3 33rd 34tr ro,... - StJt 31 31st all 3Sth 137 ~gth 31 th1 m, 3901 T - n 3811, ` - ~ 5- 51st ~ \ th us. l~ -3E►11o Terrill i1 n m I m n, Ball ' a c Traffic 160 1 l 0' - y . l ' 441h 1 J Collision Ufa Vista Ufa t7q --43r - rth -44th lbLl LOW d5tr- I yam. ~D lunudc q is ~Medlum Low ;~<t'. I ° ' ►tlxman rte . y m f 111111111 Medium T 11111111 hcYesr lfhfjr~w^'r; High nnma ~,btb - . as 1 2006 October Traffic Collision Hotspots Map PrptSutetl 8 November 2006 Jose Seed Oak 7 t ,;,Kat ~rR t Co 7~ - 3 ~a*tsv, a z _ tp } _ _ T Crown _ WImsk?'i - m 1~~r. L1, I Pcin':elbp ~ ~ ~ _ ~I- 3' -Ne►uY • +II. ~ - - _ Springs - u Yr m R, 9 Kle an - r. nva ` ~ ;nra x s:-i~~ L Euclid _ - tr JIILItOn Auu~:r;}.~ o Etr lid_-~'-~+~ 'Arid . - _ v1e N But Ft enck - , - - ic User' Fd Grs'>± A•-g` g e z ,;1 uck" * pttit c 0 _ r(n1 Knqx ~rm:I J` J ~A `lI Krlat ittlpr. - M - Snannon Indtena_ - Nora Woo Nam t _ - 190 i- MI ron Nt)raAus j ~t,gsJon lAa, w81 Mexwbll vS+n1D `0 Mis5iort c < - ry Shia 5h State Soon Dovnel {,old C91 tt n > CatnG Boone z o: V of ~i' I.'c B dw Dean' I vaaon -Alkl A50 AI w M tW Al 0 7., rs, , y h ci OG~a -Alk AAA 'AiM' = 7 fi. 11 Vailayw'Y 11~1q n s H hj' tic 7r SLy~ ~l.r 3 Y z, 1 Cfrd 2nd o. s 4tri 4~' HuCi~>v 7n,t C. - ~IF+ 3rd Sftt ti lb ¢j 01 cur- etn €I eln Q ~j ItlrCdr5- - -L.:l; 111f► 4y,- 13th ~t~1tL 5 qq ra { 12 tl►" l tttr c 7tilh K 1!,Ir. 18@r ( ~ Ih 31 _r^ 1BU, lr ~ 10th 2t)fh lgyr Ott', 23rd 2211 I 24 to - - <c .2y _ 23tt 'm 2w ~G. 21st - 27th 271h --1 j 3 75th _ Qt o -3 31rJ t LL 3~ st a G - - _ r1 - - o 311 - I~ 8 Std 34M ( = Q ` _ 3181 I th 01-V14 35th 3t- 33 Q r 38th 39th x°21 39th I n - o ( 49th •IUU1 I ~ j .Belle Tetrq I n m 9 x a. ~►►t Bell I AAtT Commercial 4Y~L n Salta vtnfe Burglary 49r 44th 4ih 1 $ N Af1lh M r -41409 - 46? C-- d51fT ~~sG _ - - I , 1I xoa►n3n~1 et A~~ Aunnic frlW9~ - LZI 4 =LOW 9 rE-ltlhir„ r aka, `ern,,, 5- MIMedium ~ilFs1111 I-~ Eli - ri.h:~~•} M High b3alp Produced 6 IVOVarnbur 2006 •~f ~M"' 2006 October Commercial Burglary Hotspots 7 ~tEnx,n dy f?ed 0i1 _ Fc~1+ot es9 m Jose bta Ac. _ Sarsan Cro'wrt t~ e c e sle ' S .,rnCetWt ~ p ~ ~ ~3 ~ M a springs r^ r n Co l Ggil ~C - - Kie i:' Le C ET m o a ''~fiYB MO~inpc .to 4 x - a 3 i.o• Euclid f1n.. t'1 I e e Cirnt:r -_T farviow etc ° g 2 Ft rick P = - Lraae rt' ~nn,r. JQ u` a , e _ 2 Indiana NVP ° 4 - -i Nottr~ 19 '~uliKslon titn,.,wl MPRw~f reo"' 1t11 s,nn t Mission caw '*Sdft° - Sham ° $irar; -no nocmM 3=~g~,fdo H ilne t Share AI lu ~ tp s SpFinyth►d n ~1, 6roe4rilra~ x ~a~ Coop ` E - - Atk Main Mom al 'Nngrc;n rn pp !dlt3i i Q 2 a :J1a . T'l} _ rd 3 Si 3rd 2nd - - 6 rp .T e1r n h st►~ - m. to ..i "7h1i 91h tOth_~L~r c-'' _ • tth t T + ~.,r ~a;, uti siti n :U to 12 g tth 13th 12 m 119 --i - F;at~ 3 G - x t5tl' 1601 ? -i { o. y 1~7 14Ch z o 16th rj.1$l~l ~'r Y, ID _v 2Qtf► a r t m t rlih~ 16th / _ 78th 2Dtl, 19th elh pr g c - 3Atir 3 -I rK = C - 2. "2nd '~241h tioih- 'sv~ ~6 C _23rd 25th nth 4 - I l9Rnye ,~{E View 28th - - !h ~y "+yptS? row 3plh 4- IK c3T_-5th z Sj'- 3161 LL ynd315t 3rd 340 lo, _ 351h 24 - 31st S 3 ' S5th e;~ 9 7 h In 36m' r, - •R _ a s: N 39 I~ 39th , 6: 380, 4()", in m Belle Terra n 3_Gth- - ^ tr - y 's'3Ath 101 C aain a c Reiidentiet aTw,, a_ 60Ra Vista Burg ry 44th 1 r+ ~bti1' a 10 'J ;StR r - Pane -rJ---1 - d"oth 10 Aunnlc ~ ii' Ica- _ - rite a Holman Fer* raae,t ¢ 0 Eat M Low a 9 , 5 2 =Medium Mohawk h plol 1.9 1 $ High 05 ~a"' 2006 October Residential Burglary Hotspots Map Produced:8Novcmtwr2006~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OCTOBER 2006 MONTHLY REPORT LONG RANGE PLANNING: Planning Commission The Spokane Valley Planning Commission met twice during the month of October. The Commission held public hearings on the expansion of the Urban Growth Area. The Planning Commission received preliminary drafts of proposed regulations for SEPA, critical areas and the Shoreline Master Program. Long Range Planning Community meeting was held on October 11, 2006 regarding the Sprague/Appteway Revitalization Plan with approximately 67 persons in attendance to discuss the Centers and segments of the Corridor outside of the Auto-Row Segment of the project. • • - • • s • ~Rev~tcal~~_at~or~ _ %Ah Iky The City held an Open House on October 26, 2006, as the first in a series to preview the Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program. The ad hoc Sign Committee met twice during the month of October, continuing their review of the elements of current sign regulations. Three auto dealers attended the meeting to discuss their signage. The Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) awarded a $68,000 Collaborative Planning Grant to Spokane County and the cities of Spokane, Spokane Valley, Liberty Lake and Airway Heights. Spokane Valley staff participated in preparing the grant application with Susan Winchell of the Boundary Review Board and the other jurisdictions. Work to be completed under the grant will lay the groundwork for coordinated planning within the urban growth areas by evaluating the differences in currently adopted development regulations between the County and affected jurisdictions. The project will provide objective data upon which to base coherent future land use decisions and interlocal agreements. Page 1 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report CURRENT PLANNING: 2006 Licenses & Permits Issued 50 40 - - 3.0 20 _ 10 0 Jan Fed h:1 W, !u~ lul ~g eT, ct N r Dec i 2008 44 25 38 I 34 32 23 32 35 24 21 G I 39 38 ~-2005 41 28 18 i 34 21 I 19 B 22 2 45 Monthly revenue for the Planning Division totaled $32,603 in October. 2006 Planning Revenues $50,000 $40.000 - $30,000 Ila $20,000 - • $10,000 $0 - Jan Feb Mar Apri May June July Aug Sapl Oct Nov Dec C7 Revenue 2006 -e- Revenue 2006 Page 2 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report 2006 New Land Use Actions 40 30 20 10 1s~ Feb Mar Apr MaV Jun Ail `Aug -Sap Oct Nov Doc I© 20061 20 1 18 30 24 27 1s 25 20 17 19 2005 15 1 22 20 } 24 , 18 33 f 28 17 17 28 I 18 20 Revenues generated by the Planning Division are compared with the 2006 Budget appropriation in the table below. 2006 Planning Revenues Compared with Budget f Revenues $0 $50.W00 $100.000 $150.000 1200.000 :250.000 $300.000 ~O Actual YTO Revenue a Annwl Budget Fsloste BUILDING DIVISION: The Building Division issued 392 permits in October 2006, compared with 435 for the same period last year. 2006 CONSTRUCTION PERWTs M10 - MID } -014 Z)c Ln Iwb fir AP f ab0 AdW A&M a.p Qst OO oaow ZM 1 m 363 n 1 xt- In n~ 397 Ka :D4 X570 467 _ 137 - 107 779 139 M1 M - 7tft iRno 1111 AD :T7 w! Page 3 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report 2006 New Structures/Units Pemitted 60 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb It ~A A n Mar Apr May Juno Juty I Aug Sept Oct Nov ; Dec p New I A 2 Dwelling Units 1 28 41 74 64 64 34 39 29 27 33 ■ WA-lam lly units 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 2 1 9 13 Now Commercial Structures 5 2 1 0 I 3 6 2 3 12 6 The Permit Center collected a total of $195,471 in Permit and Plan Review Fees in October 2006. 2006 8ullding Revenues raw= rromr - - SIM,= 2M Mon" CC uu - - --2005 OAnur r~ nw - '.6 Ohl Ap an 4-1 The reported value of construction, including new structures and additions./alteration is shown in the following chart, comparing these values with 2005. New value for October 2006 totals $14,754,020 for a total of $112,840,536 for the year so far. 2006 Valuation of Construction s.aaoa,ouo s~,aoo,ooo - - - _ i30.000 1)0D - - - - ~2006Velus6011 ~-2005Valuabon $19,000.Rm MAW= $5.000,000 f3 - Jan My r: wf t,3 ;n%'l ~`I Page 4 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report Annual Revenue Pmjettbn License Pernrt Fees ■ AcWaIYTD Revenue 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 1,750,000 1,300,000 1,350,000 1.400,000 1,4 50,000 SOURCE Spokane Valley Fhwnae Deportment In October 2006, building inspectors performed 1,261 inspections in 21 days. This averages 49 inspections per day. The Plans Examiners reviewed 101 projects in October 2006. At the end of October, there were 2 projects awaiting review. 2016 9uNing Insp*cW*s ,eoo torso 500 ~ as ' ran Maa a,aAa. ' a., I.a.• .i r. O~I~hy~l.e' AS] 1'l QD ;Dll i 1•]1 II]A ~ 1•:] r01 1'L: I.pl t m -~aofnsw.+wl rep--}--N~ } ~ -j e, ~ no on ~ to nI Icx 1rx Mr _ ~ 393 right-of-way inspections were performed during the month of October 2006. We welcome Jenna Davis as our new Permit Specialist. Jenna formerly served in the U.S. Armed forces in the military police, has worked in construction products in the Spokane area. She is the mother of five year old Zane, and enjoys cooking, singing and waterskiing. Bob Bebout has finished the Labor and Industries Worker Retraining Program and has become certified in residential and commercial inspection. He has also joined our staff as a regular full time employee as a Building Inspector. Bob lives in Spirit Lake; he has 3 children and 1 grandchild. We are very proud and happy to have both of them here. Page 5 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report CODE COMPLIANCE: The number of "Violations Reported' on the following chart reflects actual Spokane Valley Zoning Code violations, plus complaints received which were not violations. The complaints received are added to the total because they reflect time officers spent in the field conducting investigations. In addition, the 'Investigated' and 'Pending' columns accurately reflect Code Compliance's current ability to process and investigate backlog cases. The following chart provides a monthly comparison of the types of Spokane Valley Code violations reported. Violations are reported based on the primary complaint received, rather than the number of additional violations identified on any individual premises. The investigation of a complaint of junk vehicles, for example, might also result in identification of additional violations such as the accumulation of trash or harboring of livestock. These are not included in the summary. A total of 59 complaints were processed in October. r, UL'-05 Wv-D5 De, U5 Jan DO FM"O 4_r Apx Ct. Idd! lun r C_ rur J, XI 06 • V10owns Reporbd 53 St 53 45 134 I 143 03 oe M 87 51 59 ■ AperemeNts 65 x_43 33 27 34 - 106 82 130 116 42 de sB 45 13 Fis Trion Owe 0 0 0 0 O I 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 plan q PIu S2 1 2a 1s e2 43 4e et 54 56 66 I 53 f 47 Vblsuons Rworw ■ Ammoo111s a Fa Treneters • Pwiwa ryes The Spokane Valley Police Department, in conjunction with SCOPE, has requested the assistance of Code Compliance in identifying junk vehicles abandoned within the right-of-way. SCOPE volunteers tag the vehicles. Vehicles which have not been moved by the following Friday are towed. Activity for towing of abandoned vehicles is summarized in the following table- Quarter Processed Towed 1 - 2115 42 2 205 20 3 513 48 Oubber 114 9 Year to Data 1,117 11911 Activity is consolidated into the following six categories: Environmental (sewer/septic, critical areas, animal and nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way, property use, dangerous building, landlord/tenant, illegal business and signage violations); Junk Auto; Solid Waste (solid waste, illegal dumping, and household waste violations): Clearview Triangle and Complaint - No Violation Page 6 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report 2006 CODE COYPLMCE REPORTS ft type} 100% - - 12% oox j - 40% lox Ox Jan-06 Feb-06 Ust-06 Ay N Wri-M Jun-06 Jute Aug-06 15ep•06 OcWG Nov06 Deoft a Comple" No Viotalon 14 12 8 10 14 12 I 17 12 1 12 21 t solid watffi 11 11 17 17 13 9 8 1 i , 5 0 Junk Auto 10 9 14 10 13 D I 8 I 16 9 9 i O Clear Maw TrIanQle 2 i 4 i 8 3 4 12 18 13 10 t t i ■ prop" 8 ~ 9 10 9 17 22 17 27 13 13 , QEn*onmental 7 i 0 2 I 4 2 2 6 4 0 0 CUSTOMER SERVICE Planning The Hearing Examiner held 3 land use hearings during October. Building: Permits The following table summarizes the performance of the Permit Center for those permits entered in the PLUS system, measured from the time that the application is deemed "Counter-complete" to the time that a permit is issued. October 2008 Value 9 P. NEW CONSTRUCTION Fou bx 3 S1,065.309.00 320 320 320 Industrial Budding 1 5135 881 00 30 30 30 Metcandis 1 $6W,000,00 153 153 153 Miscellaneous 4 $1 178 938.00 123 78 168 Orfice/Protesaionsi 1 5729 600.00 68 66 _ as REMODEL HospitallInstitution 1 $17,000 00 24 24 24 Industrial Build 2 $708,337.00 122 61 1113 Mercantlie 4 $82.000 00 17 1 27 Offlce/Professional 5 $228.484.00 65.4 15 125 R_ecreatianal Bullding 2 $1 707 798.00 1025 102 103 Religious Buldi 1 S100,00000 40 40 40 Structure _ 1 55,000.00 101 10 10 Page 7 of 8 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development October 2006 Monthly Report Values shown are those on which Plan Check and Building Permit fees are based. The chart includes average, minimum and maximum times. Delays in the issuance permits October result from inadequate or incomplete submittals, failure of the applicant to pick up the permit, etc_.. The Permit Center has been tracking turnaround for Right of Way Permit Applications and the faxed Mechanical and Plumbing Permit Applications. At present the City responds to applications within 24 hours, typically by noon on the following day. Permits for those application types are generally issued within two days. Building: Inspections Inspections are conducted the day following the inspection request except for weekends and holidays Code Compliance All preliminary investigations are conducted within 24 hours except those received on Friday which are investigated before the end of the next business day. Permit Center There were no surveys retumed during the month of October Page 8 of 8 Spo;ane PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -1 Valley MONTHLY REPORT 41;000 October 2006 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION: • Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal New 2006 Interlocal approved by the County. In the process of bidding various maintenance activities per the new agreement. • Engineering Services Support - County Engineering Interlocal • Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interlocal • Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal • Safety Plan - Contract with CH2M Hill , draft safety plan in review. WASTEWATER: • Wastewater Treatment - The end of January 2005 the City received from the County financial information regarding the County's sewer utility as it relates to the assumption of the County owned sewer facilities. • The Spokane River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Collaboration process is ongoing and information is available on the web site at http://client-ross.comispokane-river/ • Spokane River Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) is available on the UAA web site at http://www.spokaneriveruses.net/links.htm i CAPITAL PROJECTS: • SRTC 2006 Call for Projects Submitted 20 project funding applications to SRTC in response of the 2006 Call for Projects seeking federal transportation funding. • Valley Corridor Project Project on hold pending outcome of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan. Participated in Subarea Plan core team meetings with consultant. • Street Master Plan Consultant completed gathering pavement rating data on all local access streets within the city and began inputting field data into the CarteGraph Pavement View Plus software for analysis. • Sullivan Road PCC Continued coordination with WSDOT. Project scheduled for construction next spring. • Pines/Mansfield Federal funds have been released for Preliminary Engineering. The County and State are designing their respective areas of the project. Right of way funds were released on November B. The County Right of Way Dept. is working on appraisals and starting the acquisition process. The project is scheduled to advertise for bids in the spring of 2007 with construction scheduled to begin in 2007. • Appleway Avenue Reconstruction - Tschirley to Hodges *David Evans & Assoc. is working on the preliminary design. Right of way funds were released October 13. David Evans & Assoc. is working on appraisals and access agreements. This project will advertise in early 2007. Current project costs significantly exceed original estimates. Received approval from SRTC to split project into two phases and use existing federal funds for phase 1 - Tschirley to Barker. A grant for federal funds to complete phase 2 was approved for 2008. • Barker Road Bridge Project Type, Size and Location Study has been approved by WSDOT. The final design and environmental permitting contract with CH2MHILL has been approved. Permitting, property acquisition and final design will take approximately one year. CH2MHILL is preparing the Environmental Classification Summary (ECS), SEPA and cultural resources study. Worked with consultant to revise location of bridge by shifting it west to minimize impacts to northeast river access. Construction • CenterPlace Working on final project closeout. • Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Project The Project is complete. • Broadway Avenue Overlay Project The Project is complete. • Argonne Road Overlay Project Paving is complete. Permanent striping will be completed in the Spring. • Barker Road Project Project complete. Punchlist items remain. • Veradale Heights Sanitary Sewer Project The project was awarded to Norm's Utility Contractor. Mainline construction began June 26th. Sanitary sewer mainline and side sewer installation is complete for this construction season. Approximately 20% of the project will be carried over to the 2007 construction season. • Electric RR Sanitary Sewer Project The project was awarded to Norm's Utility Contractor. Construction began in early April. Mainline and side sewer construction is complete. Paving is complete. Punch list items remain. • Vera Terrace Sanitary Sewer Project The project was awarded to L.L. Cargile. Mainline construction began July 19th. Mainline sewer construction is complete. Paving is complete. A required sewer connection at the intersection of 4t' and Evergreen will be constructed in early spring. Staff is working with County Utilities on pavement cuttreplacement requirements for this work. TRAFFIC: • Equipment for new flashing beacons at Seth Woodard, Broadway, and Trentwood Elementary was late from manufacturer. They should be installed in mid-November. • New evening and late night timing plans were implemented Argonne/Sprague and Mullan/Sprague in an attempt to reduce red-light running accidents. No collisions of that type have been reported since the change was made. • A No Right Turn on Red "blank-our sign was installed at 32nd/Pines and replacing the previous No Right Turn on Red signs. The "blank-out" sign tums on during the school arrival and departure periods. • The new signal at Mission/Barker was turned on. • Prepared new maps of speed limits, signal locations, and daily volume for city traffic webpage. 0 11 - Construction and utility work related traffic control plans were reviewed and approved. 28 - New citizen requests/complaints were received via phone and email. These typically involve traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concerns, streetlight outages, requests for new streetlights, traffic count requests, and parking issues. _-~STORMWATER: • Worked with Spokane County Utilities to repair two failing pump stations. Two new pumps have been ordered. Pump installation is planned for early December. Drywell Replacement and Repair Contract - Bids were received on September 2006. The contract was awarded to Cat's Eye Excavating. Drainage work began in October 2006. Installed drainage structures at 8 problem areas identified through Citizen complaints or staff historical knowledge. • Mapped drainage problem areas: Chester Creek floodplain, Ridgemont area, truck town and Ponderosa neighborhood and miscellaneous areas throughout the City. 4000+ structures were updated and 870 new structures were added to the inventory. The City owns approximately 11,000 structures (6,200 of which are drywells). • Preparing street sweeping proposal for 2007 contract year. Vactoring Services Contract - Bids were received on June 15, 2006. The contract was awarded to AAA Sweeping. Work began in August. • Awarded landscape contract to Spokane ProCare in April 2006. Spokane ProCare maintained all drainage facilities and provided weed control for roadways and other City owned property. Bids for street sweeping services were requested from our Small Rosters. The contract was awarded to AAA Sweeping. The contractor swept some arterials and residential streets. The contractor will also provide a fall cleanup and periodic sweeping during the summer. Contracted out services with Adams & Clark for flooding/erosion solutions for the Beverly Hills project. Project will be bid in January 2007. • Working with Spokane County and City of Spokane amending the regional stormwater manual. A final draft was sent to the Department of Ecology for review. f O NPDES Phase II Permit expected to be issued December 6, 2006. The permit will be effective ~January 5, 2007. STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY: City 2006 budget is $3,023,068 ($2,274,700 in the Street Fund and $748,368 in the Stormwater Fund). Through the end of October the County has billed $1,263,938 and private contracts have billed $493,190 for a total Street Maintenance cost of $1,757,128. The County has billed $557,669 and private contracts have billed $176,085 for a total Stormwater Maintenance cost of $733,754. The overall total is $2,490,882 or 75.3% of the budgeted funds. LAND DEVELOPMENT October Activity: NEW APPLICATIONS COMMERCIAL APPLICATIONS o West Coast Paper 100,000 sf Warehouse o Alterna Care 3,000 sf medical clinic o Bennett Espresso Stand 110 sf espresso stand COMMERCIAL PRE-APPLICATIONS o Pinecroft Office Warehouse 13,000 sf office & warehouse FINAL PLAT APPLICATIONS o SHP-10-05 4 lot short plat LAND USE PRE-APPLICATIONS o PRE-58-06 3 lot short plat a PRE-56-06 12 lot binding site plan o PRE-60-06 UR-3.5 to UR-7* and 14 duplex lots o PRE-61-06 4 lot short plat 0 COMBO (REZONEISUBDIVISION) APPLICATIONS o Valley Coach Estates 20 duplex lots SHORT PLAT APPLICATIONS o SHP-21-06 3 lot short plat o SHP-29-06 4 tot short plat o SHP-30-06 3 lot short plat REZONE APPLICATIONS o REZ-21-06 UR-7 to UR-22 o REZ-23-06 UR-3.5 to UR-7* o REZ-22-06 UR-3.5 to UR-22 c7n nc' Spokane ,;oOValley Capital Improvement Projects 2005 & 2006 PROJECTS Proposed Estimated Design Construction 2005 (2006) Total Project Funding Road Construction Projects Project Location Bid Date Completion Date Complete complete Funding Cost STP(U) Argonne Road Overlay Indiana Avenue to Montgomery Avenue Mar-06 11/1106 100% 90% $ 316,600 $ 316,600 STP(U) Broadway Avenue Overlay Bates Road to Sullivan Road Mar-06 1111!06 100% 100% $ 812,700 $ 812,700 Road Design Projects 'nB/CMAQ PineslMansfiebd Project Wilbur Rd. to Pines Rd., Pines to 1 90 Feb-07 12115106 60% 0%- $ 1,032,015 $ 4,500,825 STP(U) Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Tschirley Rd. to Hodges Rd. Feb-07 11115106 70% 0% $ 609,000 S 3,197,000 BR Barker Road Bridge Replacement Barker Rd. at Spokane River Jan-08 1211109 60% 0% $ 896,101 $ 8,092,700 Sewer Projects Parks Road Trent to 1-90, Thierman to Park 711106 100% 100% S 1,445,000 $ 1,445,000 Orchard Avenue Spokane River to Liberty. Coleman to Vista 7/15/06 100% 100% $ 2,895,000 $ 2,895,000 City Veradale Heights - Paveback Vaileyway to Mission, Evergreen to Adams Mar-06 611107 100% 80% $ 430.256 $ 430,256 City Vera Terrace - Paveback 2nd to 7th, Evergreen to Burns May-06 5!1107 100% 95% $ 341,264 $ 341,264 City Electric RR - Paveback Park to Vista, Trent to Utah Mar-06 10115105 100% 10D% $ 87,369 $ 87,369 Planning Projects STP(U) Valley Corridor Environmental Study University to Appleway nla Jun-07 09/D 0% $ - $ - STP(U) Valley Coup!et - Project 2 University to Evergreen 0% 0% Total $ 8,865,305 $ 22,118,714 STP(U) - Surface Transportation Prograin (Urban); TIB - Transportation Improvement Board; BRAC - Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee; CDBG - Community Development Block Grant Program CMAQ - Congestion Management/Air Quality Program; STA - Spokane Transit Authority Oct 2006 Construction Projects CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: November 28, 2006 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Urban Growth Area recommendation from Spokane Valley Planning Commission. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Washington State Growth Management Act, RCW 36.70.A. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: Planning Staff previously discussed Urban Growth Area issues with Council on August 9, 2005 and November 1, 2005. Council directed staff to develop a proposal for City of Spokane Valley UGA's in conjunction with Spokane County's Comprehensive Plan update process. r BACKGROUND: Spokane County is conducting 'a 5-year update of its Comprehensive Plan, which was adopted November 15, 2001. The update includes a review of Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries as required by the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) for Spokane County. The Growth Management Act (GMA) gives counties the authority to adopt population projections and to establish UGAs, in consultation with cities. Important steps in the update process include: • Spokane County adopts a 20-year countywide population projection. • Population projection is allocated to jurisdictions. • Cities and County develop UGA proposals. • Steering Committee of Elected Officials reviews UGA proposals, then makes recommendation to Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). • BOCC adopts new UGAs. The City of Spokane Valley adopted its first Comprehensive Plan on April 25, 2006. The Comprehensive Plan focuses on growth and. development only within the current City limits. Spokane Valley is participating in the County's Comprehensive Plan update and will propose UGAs for Spokane Valley's future growth. State law requires Spokane County and cities to update their Comprehensive Plans by December, 2006. Due to delays adopting a 20-year population projection and allocation, Spokane County has decided to separate the Urban Growth Area update from the overall Comprehensive Plan update. The Growth Management Act requires UGA updates every 10 years while the Countywide Planning Policies require a 5-year update. New UGAs will likely be adopted during the 2007 County Comprehensive Plan amendment process. Population Proiection and Allocations Spokane County projects that the County will grow by approximately 197,000 people by the year 2026. The Countywide projection as been allocated to all jurisdictions with Spokane Valley receiving about 33,000 people for planning purposes (see attached letter from Jim Manson, Spokane County Building and Planning Director). Urban Growth Areas UGAs are defined by a boundary where new growth and development is encouraged. Land outside UGAs is considered "rural" land, with residential lot sizes limited to 5, 10 and 20 acres. UGA's must be sized to accommodate the 20-year population projection. The attached map titled "County Proposal for Urban Service Analysis-May 23, 2006) shows areas that Spokane County is considering for UGA designation. Land Quantity Analysis (LQA) To determine how much land is needed to accommodate the projected population growth, each jurisdiction is required to conduct a land capacity analysis using a regional methodology. The general steps are as follows: 1. Determine amount of vacant land. 2. Determine amount of land that is partially used but could redeveloped. 3. Remove land affected by critical areas (wetlands, shorelines, etc.) 4. Remove public/quasi public land (schools, utilities, state, federal, etc.) 5. Deduct 20% that will be used for public purposes. 6. Deduct 30% for land that will not be available for development. This analytical exercise yields the number of developable acres within a specified area. The acreage is then converted into potential new dwelling units, as determined by residential densities allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. For example, 10 developable acres in the Low - Density Residential category is multiplied by 4 units per acre, yielding 40 total potential new dwelling units. The total dwelling units is then multiplied by 2.5 (2.5 people per dwelling unit) in single family areas and 2 in multi-family areas to determine the population that could be accommodated. In our example, 40 dwelling units would accommodate 100 people. To determine Spokane Valley's capacity for growth, we first applied the LQA within our current City boundary. We then analyzed existing unincorporated Urban Growth Areas adjacent to the City, then to County Urban Reserve Areas. Spokane Valley's Land Quantity Analysis results are as follows: Potential UGAs Vacant.and Partially Net.Dev_elopable Potential New Dwelling Population,- Used Acres Acres. Units Ca aci City of Spokane Valle 3,149 1,564 9,303 20,632 Plantes Fe 120 69 275 687 Northeast 42 24 96 239 Southeast 1,637 962 3,849 10,131 Ponderosa 5 3 12 30 Ed ediff 241 138 551 1,377 otal 5,194 2,761 14,086 33,096 The geographic subareas referenced in the table are shown on the attached map titled "Planning Commission Recommended Urban Growth Areas". As shown in the table above, the potential UGAs have the capacity to accommodate the population allocated to the City by Spokane County. Facilities and Services New growth places new demands on public facilities and services. The GMA requires that each jurisdiction quantify the impacts of new development on public facilities and services, identify future deficiencies, and determine costs for new infrastructure. Each jurisdiction must then show how the required capital improvements will be funded. The table displays acres of land in water districts and percentage of land that is currently sewered by subarea. Acres in Water Percentage Acres Percentage Potential UGAs' Total Acres in Water .District Di"strict Sewered Sewered - 0% Plantes Ferry 250 237 95% 0 Northeast 46 43 93% 6 13% Southeast 2781 2193 79% 1147 41% Ponderosa 47 47 100% 12 26% b 2009 Ed eciiff 315 301 96% 27 9%0 otal 3439 2821 82% 1192 35% Service Providers The following table shows water, sewer, school and fire districts by UGA subarea. Potential UGAs Water Districts School,Districts Fire Districts Sewer Plantes Ferry Trentwood No. 3 East Valley Fire District 1 None Fire District 9 Northeast Consolidated No. 19 East Valley Fire District 1 Spokane County ~ Consolidated No. 19 Southeast Vera No. 15 Central Valley Fire District 1 Spokane County Model No. 18 Fire District 8 Spokane Count No. 3 Ponderosa Spokane County No. 3 Central Valley Fire District 8 Spokane County Edgecliff East Spokane No. 1 West Valley Fire District 1 Spokane County Spokane No. 81 Fire District 8 The attached report titled "Staff UGA Analysis: Report to Planning Commission" provides more detailed capital facilities information. Once Council identifies a preferred UGA boundary, Planning Staff will prepare an update to the Capital Facilities Plan to be incorporated into the 2007 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendment process. PLANNING COMMISSION PROCESS: After a series of public meetings and hearings, and after reviewing all public comments, the Planning Commission voted (4 to 2) to recommend to Council UGAs as depicted on the attached map titled "Planning Commission Recommended UGA's". UGA meetings and hearings were conducted on the following dates: • On August 24, 2006 - UGA Open House • September 28, 2006 - Planning Commission Workshop • October 12, 2006 - Planning Commission Public Hearing • October 26, 206 - Continued Hearing November 8, 2006 - Continued Hearing, final recommendation Commission members voting "no" expressed concern about allowing growth in the east end of the City served by Central Valley School District after the District's bond proposal failed. Another concern related to an irregular existing UGA boundary north of Wellesley Road at Flora. RECOMMENDATION: Direct Staff to prepare a motion to request UGAs as recommended by the Spokane Valley Planning Commission, or provide additional direction to staff. STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner, Greg McCormick, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Letter from James Manson, Spokane County Building and Planning Director 2. County Proposal for Urban Service Analysis map - May 23, 2006 3. Planning Commission Recommended UGA map 4. Staff UGA Analysis report. 1 spomiq cou~ BUILDING AND PLANNING JAMES L, MANSON, DIRECTOR TO: Whom it May Concern: FROM: Jim Manson, Department of Building and Planning Dire ` RE: 5-Year Update of Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Area Boundary As you may be aware, Spokane County and local municipalities are required to update their respective Comprehensive Plans and Urban Growth Areas by December 1, 2006. On May 23, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners, adopted a population allocation for initial planning purposes for the 20-year planning horizon from 2006-2026. This allocation consists of the Office of Financial Management (OFM) medium forecast with an additional 12.5% buffer In response to the initial population allocation the Department of Building and Planning has prepared a "draft" map illustrating County 2006-2026 ADD'L potential areas for consideration for Urban Growth Area Boundary Municipality ALLOCATION modifications to accommodate the initial projected population SpokaPie 197,639 'allocation. As illustrated on the attached "draft" map, the areas -Unincorporated 66,073 ..)under consideration for potential Urban Growth Area Boundary modifications are shown in red and those areas are currently Airway Heights 5,066 designed as Urban Reserve per the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Cheney 3,289 Those areas shown in cross-hatching are individual public comments or requests related to the Comprehensive Plan land use Deer Park 2,479 designations in the Urban Reserve Areas or adjacent to the existing Fairfield 212 Urban Growth Area Boundaries (see attached). Latah 82 Liberty Lake 15,586 To facilitate our deadline of December 1, 2006 to update the Urban Medical Lake 798 Growth Area and Spokane County Comprehensive Plan we request Millwood 91 your expedited review of the "draft' map and provide comments as Rockford 239 to your ability to provide serviceslinfrastructure to serve the _Sp~le j 322 identified areas consistent with the adopted Levels of Service Spokane _ 70,235 (LOS) in the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan Capital Facilities Spokane Valley 33,125 Plan and Countywide Planning Polices by providing the information Waverly 41 on the Evaluation of Public Facilities Form (see attached). If you are not able to provide services consistent with adopted Levels of Service (LOS) please provide specific comments as the reason and/or additional needs to serve in the form on new infrastructure (e.g. new arterials, reservoir, etc.) the associated approximate cost, and timeframe for delivery. Please forward your review comments by June 29, 2006. To address any questions you may have regarding the "draft" map we have scheduled a meeting for June 22, 2006 at 10.00 a.m, in Conference Room 2B where staff will be available to discuss the "draft" map and provide additional clarification as needed. I realize this is a very short notice but hope you can provide this information in order to move forward with .he update process in a manner to accommodate our deadline of December 1, 2006. 1026 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050 PHONF,: 509-477-3675 • FAx: 509-477-4703 • 'TUL7:a09-47 7-7133 RETURN to 5-Year Update Page Coi>;m Pj -Y"I! 1 ' ri, -i Service, !~naIvs1s ~ NO I)l1f f--.-CjA c- Ccmprrehensive Plan Updmc 1)r6un Cituaih Areas L roan Rescr+e Areas FGF"h`D r t ttirsideCrC1 for I.fnmc tprnattci UGA 1 _ FsLILrrM Ll" ReRvtst w LwLudc 6 Mok t + Lid 1 00,4., - M6 Populawin Allocabffn 0 Pit 4JFA - ]imur,tm{tt~r - I f ! t tarty a, cord A.u Ae■ iae j , ' # 4j t Fil- Mcly 4°CA 1.191D 13.1Q,8?9 q& 3 NtUOL 1 120A - luextitv?cCYsngr !?S ® F013=021 lit~a all E.T linwth Amu kn{!mi Kwv.n?AEr. Z - _ Ski huirL4 LIGA - Lr~■n g=ar,~ ~mnnwv Pttfat] a, j } 1 Ate&,widc Ccobi~i-' r I .y F1 %T N NJ! ReUR2 - 7.503 Ma¢h h1cm; PrR+ 4.465 LDARt q 1 t tea-- 1- VaJIIy PLM4 5,119 ti~1~1~L }~.(t f } \ ~n,niml k} { Niank.Valiry{,'Pi 1, ?7 _ Fi " i Sxrk v`■un IV, -vun mu wilt Me■dLDAR - 1IEb + r , Rlstt MaLm 5pur=9,57D } 1tj T s PoguL+vrnPmFhaY=706? xvi, May 2.1,21C6 HCK2PuputdcrA13ucttme•3~6,L7S •A I - 9''F - 6t11G Allixatu isi 4!C.A 24.•429 1 ~ } iItlt;~l]urarxtmPtun]•:`t~49 14 T y, 5 `t - - _ - 4 _ . Ti n n; NL11a tits of rre , P 1 b ! i- t7R r _El Yid rl-f+ ~I Y PIS f - = I j l 1 _ 41 { + `l IL i I ~ I t_ 1 P ! 1+a T -~~1+1h F 1 idLY BU's 11*41 k6 gUre,M+■dt:~Od n■,4-VrwE!if 1 ~.'~vronC bz wWtag"HoYntPISrdtam ~Sd 9t1. ~h1aiWL Ibl rl~~ Spokane County Building & Planning ~x,e~~ ■brt S;, _-.z,vreaWm ml roach.. IbQ.s yi FINos AN AQW.Tyram r I - r+ Y 5 11 117e1rtP:°r ~ I'm- .y 4 v I rll - r' L s# I 7.4 it I h afl oo4m a dl r r I~~hatl'cr {'P rtGe r _ r r+ I rl Reserve 1,,pth,utr 4 ~ i a n t- J~` ~yrk s _ i i °n ~ p ! ~ 'I IIII > t ! ly FI Irw~.~4`-III R t4l_ , I t (r [1 INA , A 1 1 SpoWnc 7-; rev"-. Y p i l ~1 ~ • ' ; 9 4r~• ,r;fLLr_.~41•Y.~I rau -I`"F~ •{r~" a ~1r rl~ll: ~Ila'~I k dl --'---rte. d ~N14~i i r- ~ rF ~ il; slk ul+b;l rra ~t'. t': ~ _ _ I .f - r~_ N l'.141I~3 511 1 Fes- crown 0f'NIiII~~,t~~lt~ .1~'~ cup : - i ,~7 'I } I•I''' t I{~ y 14- kl~-'.~ Htycnr 1 L:. .1 ~ti .J {y ~I C 1J 11 -~i ~rd'd~74 .4 yr i ~J 4 p •7 Y T r~~I _ a -i rI Y I ly } y ~ ~ r Yr - . ~1., J4 71_1 .1c t l _ fff I Sol, )1 a 41 - - 1 I r `I.' - y4R y,~ -`^fn 1 ~S ~ I" a Il 4,..~ ~,.,I • ~ J J"e a::l _kl -IF'f Al 1 PCK 3r-I.„ lli.' I Il 1- , u N,i- m'a .5 r Lake 11 I I fi" ~y 71. Il H thy I -1~ _ - _ - - - - =f - 47 'o5- *~T` ~ 411r ~ x¢rs _ - 4 y : * y IJ I , 11 51=, lu 4~ its / °S y~_ ~ A I ' y l 5 11 ~ I -4- 4 ~y { y ~,:L 1~7-r -iy { r II - • l a r}s p I L I1 I 1 r r- I Y~r .,rp' aIGE- I z i4~ c Irr I_` ~_A1 I;d- N I 1.1 e.l_.J... h Ff~►`t r~aJ 1 '•!1 " " -T ~ + 4 { may, X111 „dal +""1' 7,!-~`. , I b -.d;.o" -L , , i,- - r 1::11' 1, •p~ 3 {,alr l i`iran REIers V. R k~~ G r Ii! d'14q ~'b43m X11- - ' " r P ! l yi 1 tiS LL.I I r4 ° y} rr ` r ~'4~,. 5 yl r~ i y'C~ 5 I' 1,+1~ 0. _ i _ l• IT. II r s t~., 1 4s ° r ~ 1 811111 Rf'+{`f1't .7 fi'r. ' - - _ I~ I"`.,, I - _ R1_ 1 I r - ~~t °a1 'l y_ ~ ~ 1 r+4 ~ ` _ ~ 4u1.G"4ru;f ~ I . °;1711 ~ I i ~ I° 1 14- >71 Tw l r '4 i 1 ` { l'riran lCcser„• J I : z \ i° s - i~ r__ i -rl +ye1M r F --y~~''~rg-~ 41,r3 '"y''°•~ ._y inp ._I , e ~ 4 ~ ~•5~ , "^~I L~ lirh k V` ~ ~y+, J° ~ r yy1. ~ _ 11 41 Say of5 x&uit vary fklml nd 1 dtl'l:anluupiiy I1e'4rlupme111 I Legend ~Nr'4lfapofrlenpis~ l.'rf1S111 Ilc~eJ'1c Itl~,,. ^'I tlti~ ~.:°14, ! YiNj a~~yy~ bid Rilhl 1;7tIYl Neuafs .I u~.c.r. w+~r1..11.r ..4 .Jr.m "t J I I k ~n 1a. a4 R51aYl+ i krft>GgUCLA .I 1 y{1 -F a~~ 't. I,i}I4 'T 'mm, ho [a+R+r d M,a V- /J rgyT r '-Y ~ J ~ ~6 ^I r ~VddUl3 I4CV 4 rte.! d .n..r. # ~ W R n+.Jr q-1m41+~wq hr w•w. nl 9 t° J~'Y~ } 111 y,. r ~ uh4tr6 l k. h F ~1 7 *~my I - : y X Grp + olu I aa.....d `InN - F ` I I I I.i ` ~ 11 ~t=='-L71tr~i~,~e.~ y - 44 d.nh rd h{!m~ 4~1}~1. IhIKS~ "y,®.y .3ra..4~.rr'~++.uNeu a v~~ ~Za1k' F~n.H1A r:l ldkx i Vcll Ir I I I I 1 5 " r.~+rlr.fw.ry.4~rrrlr~r~~tir~. - 'r., Staff UGA Analysis Report to Planning Commission October 20, 2006 The following information is intended to assist the Commission in its review and recommendation of Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries for the City. Attached to this report are letters and emails received by the City regarding the process to evaluate Urban Growth Areas. Also attached is a chart showing population capacities, percentage of property by subarea within water districts, percentage sewered and percentage of each subarea containing critical areas. Subarea: Northwood/Pasadena (not recommended for S.V. UGA) 1. Population Capacity. 4,293 2. Existing Development Pattern. This area is largely developed in suburban densities, roughly 2-4 units per acre in Northwood and approximately 1 unit per acre in the Pasadena neighborhood. Lot pattern and size would make conversion to urban densities very difficult in the Pasadena area. The area is currently designated as an Urban Growth Area for unincorporated Spokane County and is located within an airport hazard zone. 3. Critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The Northwood area is developed on moderately steep slopes. The area has few wetlands and due existing development the area does not provide significant wildlife habitat. The Pasadena area includes shoreline along the Spokane River which is largely developed with single family homes on_ long, linear lots that are perpendicular to the river. The area is traversed by a narrow flood zone below the Northwood developments. The flood zone is not significantly impacted by development. 4. Services/Utilities. a. Fire. Northwood/Pasadena is served by Fire District No.'s 1 and 9. The City of Spokane Valley is currently annexed to Fire District No. 1. Annexation of Northwood would likely require a vote of Spokane Valley residents to annex into Fire District No. 9. b. Water. The area is located within Pasadena Park Irrigation District #17. c. Sewer. The area is fully sewered. d. Parks. The nearest public park is Plantes Ferry, approximately 2 miles to the east of Argonne via Upriver Drive. e. Schools. West Valley School District 5. Transportation. Access to the Northwood area is from Argonne Road to the east. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 6. Public Input. Residents in the Northwood/Pasadena area do not support designating this area as Spokane Valley's UGA. The Boundary Review Board heard similar testimony during incorporation public hearings and excluded the area from the originally proposed City boundary. 7. General Comments. The Northwood/Pasadena area is somewhat isolated from Spokane Valley by both the Spokane River and the incorporated Town of Millwood. If this area were annexed in the future, service delivery would be inconvenient at best, especially in terms of police and street maintenance/snow plowing services. The area does not share a common border with the City of Spokane Valley. Further, the Northwood area is nearly fully developed and the quality/condition of existing infrastructure is unknown. Subarea: Plantes Ferry 1. Population Capacity. 687 2. Existing Development Pattern. Plantes Ferry is within an Urban Reserve area as designated by Spokane County. The existing large lot development pattern would allow for conversion to urban densities. The area is adjacent to the City of Spokane Valley. 3. Critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The area has some frontage along the Spokane River including a small flood zone. The area has no apparent wetlands upland of the Spokane River. 4. Services/Utilities. a. Fire. The area is served by both Fire District No.'s 1 and 9; Fire District No. 9 does not currently provide fire services within Spokane Valley. Annexation into the City of Spokane Valley would also require annexing into Fire District No. 9, or a possible assumption into Fire District No. 1. b. Water. The area is located within Trentwood Irrigation District. c. Sewer. The area does not have sewer service as it is not located within an existing Urban Growth Area. Further, property within the City of Spokane Valley to the east and south is not scheduled to be sewered until 2007/2008. Developers would be required to extend sewer to this area if it is included in the UGA. d. Parks. The area includes Plantes Ferry Park. The adopted Parks Level of Service of 1.92 acres per 1000 residents correlates to an additional demand of 1.32 acres of park land. e. Schools. East Valley School District. 5. Transportation. The area is bisected by Wellesley Ave. and has few internal roads. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 6. Public Input. No comments have been received concerning this area. 7. General Comments. Subarea: Northeast 1. Population Capacity. 239 2. Existing Development Pattern. This area is an undeveloped Urban Growth Area; the Commission should consider adding land to the UGA directly to the west, which would create a more logical UGA boundary. The subarea consists of three, large acreage parcels to the north of Wellesley Road and a few smaller parcels to the south of Wellesley. 3. Critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The area does not have any known critical or environmentally sensitive areas. 4. Services/Utilities. a. Fire. The area is served by Fire District No. 1. b. Water. The area is served by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19. c. Sewer. The property is not sewered; however, land on the south side of Wellesley, within the City of Spokane Valley, is sewered. d. Parks. The closest public parks are Plantes Ferry Park to the west and park and Sullivan Park to the south. School play fields are within close proximity. e. Schools. East Valley School District. 5. Transportation. Access to this largely undeveloped area is from Wellesley Road and Flora Avenue. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 6. Public Input. Spokane Valley has not received any comments concerning this area. 7. General Comments. Subarea: Southeast 1. Population Capacity. 10,131 2. Existing Development Pattern. The Southeast subarea includes a significant amount of land already designated as UGAs by Spokane County. The subarea also includes land designated as Urban Reserve by Spokane County, including land south of Belle Terre and around Barker Road. The subarea also includes land designated Rural by Spokane County (colored white on the Proposed UGA map). These areas are proposed as UGAs mainly to creative logical boundaries. The Southeast UGA includes many new developments and large vacant parcels that will certainly develop in the near future. 3. Critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The southeast subarea is a large region spanning from Hodges Rd on the east to Dishman/Mica on the west end. The area south of Belle Terre Road, between Sullivan and Evergreen, includes a flood zone running north and west from Belle Terre. The Chester Creek flood zone runs along the east side of Dishman-Mica Road. The area has steep slopes and erodible soils. 4. Services/Utilities. a. Fire. The area is served by Fire District No.'s 1 and 9, both currently providing fire services within the City of Spokane Valley. No change in fire service is anticipated. b. Water. The area is served by Vera Irrigation District and Consolidated Irrigation District. c. Sewer. Portions of the subarea have been sewered. Developers will be responsible to extend sewer lines for new development in areas currently without sewer. d. Parks. The additional population results in a demand of approximately 20 acres of park land at 1.92 acres per thousand people. e. Schools. Central Valley School District. 5. Transportation. Growth in the Southeast subarea will continue to impact Spokane Valley infrastructure. Delay at major intersections, such as Sullivan/Sprague, Pines/Sprague, and Barker/Sprague will continue to increase. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 6. Public Input. A number of requests have been received for property to be added to the UGA in the Southeast subarea. Please refer to the County's map showing such requests and to correspondence received by Spokane Valley Planning. 7. General Comments. Staff is concerned about extending the UGA south of Belle Terre road due to age of existing subdivisions, stormwater issues and significant current population requiring public services. Subarea: Ponderosa 1. Population Capacity. 30 2. Existing Development Pattern. This area is within the existing Spokane County UGA. The County approved a preliminary plat on the property adjacent to 44`h Ave. 3. Critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The area is within close proximity to the Dishman Hills, has good wildlife habitat and a seasonal stream. 4. Services/Utilities. a. Fire. The area is served by Fire District No.'s 1 and 9, both currently providing fire services within the City of Spokane Valley. No change in fire service is anticipated. b. Water. The area is served by Vera Irrigation District and Consolidated Irrigation District. c. Sewer. Portions of the subarea have been sewered. Developers will be responsible to extend sewer lines for new development. d. Parks. The nearest public parts is Browns park at 321d and Pines. e. Schools. Central Valley School District. 5. Transportation. The main concern with this property is emergency vehicle access through the Ponderosa neighborhood. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 6. Public Input. The Ponderosa neighborhood has voiced concern about adding any more land to the UGA. This property is already within the existing UGA and staff does not propose to add any more land around Ponderosa. - - 7. General Comments. Subarea: Edgecliff 1. Population Capacity. 1,377 2. Existing Development Pattern. This subarea, almost entirely developed as very large acreage parcels, is adjacent to the Spokane Valley city boundary. The subarea is currently entirely designated as an UGA. 3. Critical areas and environmentally sensitive areas. The area has a significant flood zone that runs somewhat parallel to the City's boundary, eventually turning north into the Central Park area. 4. Services/Utilities. a. Fire. The area is served by Fire District No.'s 1 and 9, both currently providing fire services within the City of Spokane Valley. No change in fire service is anticipated. b. Water. The area is served by East Spokane Water District. East Spokane is currently out of water rights and it is unclear if new development can be approved within the district. c. Sewer. The subarea is not sewered. Developers will be responsible to extend sewer lines for new development. d. Parks. The additional population results in a demand of approximately 2.64 acres of park land at 1.92 acres per thousand people. e. Schools. West Valley and Spokane School District 81. 5. Transportation. The area has few existing public roads. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 6. Public Input. The City has received interest from at least one property owner within this subarea to annex to the City of Spokane Valley. New traffic modeling based on a draft UGA must be conducted by SRTC to determine impacts to the transportation system. 7. General Comments.