The URL can be used to link to this page

2004, 06-22 Regular MeetingAGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING # 46 Tuesday, June 22, 2004 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL AT REDWOOD PLAZA 11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor Council Requests All Electronic Devices be Turned Off During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, INVOCATION: Pastor David D'Aur'ia, Messianic Jewish Fellowship ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS For members of the Public to speak to the Council regarding matters NOT on the Agenda. Please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Six-Year ' Transportation Improvement Plan — Steve Worley 2. CONSENT AGENDA Consists of' items considered routine which are approved as a group. A Councilmernber may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. a. Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes of.lune 8, 2004 b. Approval of Claims in the amount of S350,443.83 c. Approval of June 15, 2004 payroll of $ 1 08,018.23 NEW BUSINESS 3. First Reading Proposed Vacation Ordinance 04 -019, STV01 -04 — Marina Sukup [public comment] 4. First Reading Proposed Vacation Ordinance 04 -020, STV02 -04 — Marina Sukup [public comment] 5. First Readings: 2003 Comp Plan Amendments, Reconsideration of Ordinances Remanded by the GMA Hearing's hoard - Greg McCormick /Scott: Kuhta a. Proposed Ordinance 04 -022 (CPA 03 -02) [public comment] b. Proposed Ordinance 04 -021 (CPA 03 -0I) [public comment] c. Proposed Ordinance 04 -023 (CPA 03 -03) [public comment] d. Proposed Ordinance 04 -024 (CPA 03 -04) [public comment] e. Proposed Ordinance 04 -025 (CPA 03 -05) [public comment] f. Proposed Ordinance 04 -026 (CPA 03 -06) [public comment] g. Proposed Ordinance 04 -027 (CPA 03 -07) [public comment] 6. Proposed Resolution 04 -018 Amending Resolution 04 -007 Creating Student Advisory Council - Mayor DeVleming [public comment] Council Agenda 06 -22 -04 Regular Meeting Page I of 2 7. Proposed Resolution 04 -019 Approving Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program. — Steve Worley [public comment] 8. Motion Consideration: Set Election Date of 09/14/04 for Fire Districts Annexation - Nina Regor [public comment] 9. Motion Consideration: Parks MastcrPlan Contract Award — Mike Jackson ADMIINJSTRATIVE REPORTS: [no public comment] 10. Valley Corridor Environmental Assessment/Traffic Study — 1 1. Business Registration Discussion — Ken Thompson 12. Report on Proposed Resolution Amending Leave Policies — UsTORMATION ONLY: [no public comment[ 13. Department. Monthly Reports 14. Planning Commission Approved Minutes of May 13, 2004 ADJOURNMENT Other Tentative Upconune Meetini ►h /Events: June 26, 2004 — Ralf.Day Council Retreat June 29, 2004, City Council Study Session, 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall July 6, 2004 — No Council Study Session or Council Meeting July 13, 2004, City Council Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall July 14, 2004, 6:00 p.m., Conversation w /Community, Mirabcau Point Park July 20, 2004, No Council Study Session or Council meeting Council Agenda 06 -22-04 Regular Meeting Neil Kersten Nina Regor [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS (Maximum of three minutes please; state your name and address for the record) FUTURE SCHEDULE Regular Council Meetings are generally held 2nd and 4 Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m. Council Study .Sessions are generally held ft, 3.d and 5th Tuesdays, beginning at 6:00 p.m. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (5U9) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Page 2of2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: El consent ❑ old business ❑ new business public hearing ❑ information ['admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2005 — 2010 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six -year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2004 -2006 Six Year TIP last year on June 10, 2003, Resolution #03 -037. Adopted Amended 2004 -2009 Six Year TIP on December 23, 2003, Resolution #03 -055, to include Bowdish /24 Avenue Sidewalk grant project. BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public hearing adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before July 1 of each year. Staff presented to Council a draft 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP at the April 6, 2004 study session and at the June 8, 2004 Council public meeting. The proposed TIP in large part reflects the 2004- 2009 adopted Six Year TIP prepared last year by the interim staff and Spokane County. Proposed changes from last year's TIP include: • Adding the widening of 8 Avenue from Havana to Park Road to a 3 -lane urban section (2005) • Adding Sullivan Road North Extension in coordination with Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch project (2005) • Identifying four road rehabilitation projects for federal funding (Broadway Ave., Wellesley Ave., Park Rd. and Dishman Mica Road) (2005) • Rescheduling the Couplet project from 2008 to 2006 • Delaying Park Road Grade Separation (Bridging the Valley) to 2006 to coincide with revised schedule • Delaying to 2009 the widening of 32 " Avenue from SR27 to Best Road (City limit) to coincide with County's schedule for widening 32 Avenue from Best Road to Sullivan. OPTIONS: Accept or revise project list and/or project schedule RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Adopt 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's share of the proposed projects will be budgeted within the Street Capital Projects Fund which has the revenue resources to accommodate the proposed TIP. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Steve Worley ATTACHMENTS: 1) Summary description of proposed projects 2) List of Draft 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP projects 3) Draft 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP, 2005 Annual Construction Program 4) Map of Draft 2005 -2006 Six Year TIP City of Spokane Valley Draft 2005 -2010 Six -year Transportation Improvement Program Project Descriptions 1. Barker Road Barker Road will be constructed to a full three -lane arterial standard from Boone Avenue to the bridge over the Spokane River. Curbs and sidewalks will be included. TIB grant received for this project. Total Project cost: $2,500,000. City share $468,000. 2. Barker Road Bridge This project will reconstruct the Barker Road bridge over the Spokane River. Widening of this bridge is needed because development in the area has increased traffic volumes. Federal Bridge Replacement Grant funds covering 100% of the project cost was received in 2004. Total Project Cost: $8,100,000 City share: $0. 3. Pines[Mansfield Project This is a joint project between the City, WSDOT, and private developers. It will move the signal at westbound on- and off -ramps to the Mansfield Intersection reducing congestion on Pines Road. The project will reconstruct the westbound on- ramp aligning it with Indiana to the east. This will close the access to Montgomery Road, which will end in a cul -de -sac. The westbound off -ramp will be connected to Indiana Avenue. Construction is scheduled for 2005, 2006 and 2007. There is currently a funding shortfall of approximately $960,000. Federal funds will be sought to fill the shortfall. Cost $3,768,000. City share $55,000. 4. Appleway Blvd. Reconstruct Appleway Blvd. to five lanes with curbs and sidewalks from Tschirley Road to Hodges Road. Cost $3,200,000. City share $433,000. S 8` Avenue This project will widen 8 Avenue from Havana to Park Road to an urban 3 -lane section with curb, gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes. This project will be coordinated with SRTC's Southside Transportation Study. Total project cost: $4,780,000. City share: $643,000. 6. Sullivan Road North Extension Extend Sullivan Road north of Wellesley Avenue to the City limit with a 5 -lane arterial. This project is being done in coordination with Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch Road project. Total project cost: $4,030,000. City share: $60,000. 7. Valley Couplet — Project 2 Construct a one -way street from University Road to Evergreen Road. This will be a 3 -lane urban arterial with sidewalks and bike lanes. This project is partially funded. A $4.2 million grant was secured from the TIB. WSDOT has promised Funding to cover half the cost of the Pines Road /Appleway Blvd. concrete intersection and signals. Federal funds will be sought to cover part of the current city match requirement. Program is to begin PE in 2006 with R/W and construction in 2008 and 2009. Total project cost: $8,376,000. City share: $1,715,000. 8. Evergreen Road Reconstruct Evergreen Road from 32 " Avenue to 16` Avenue to a three -lane urban section. Cost $2,500,000. City share $500,000. 9. Park Road Grade Separation - BTV This project is part of the Bridging the Valley program and will construct a bridge to take vehicle traffic over the BNSF tracks at Trent Avenue. The County has applied for funding through the Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board (FMSIB). However, it has not risen high enough on their list to be actually funded. We would anticipate that the BNSF, TIB, and possibly WSDOT could be funding partners with the City on this project. Cost to be determined by SRTC. City share unknown. 10. Barker Road Reconstruct Barker Road from the Spokane River to Euclid Avenue. The section will be three wide and cost approximately $1;287,000. City share $172,000. 11. Sullivan Road West Bridge Reconstruct the west bridge over the Spokane River. This bridge would widen to accommodate traffic turning west onto Lndiana Avenue. Cost $8,000,000. City share $0. 12. Flora/SR 290 Minor Intersection Improvements This is a WSDOT safety project to prevent southbound vehicles from turning left onto SR 290. Cost is about $13,000. City share: $2,000. 13. Flora Road This project will construct Flora Road to a three -lane section from Sprague Avenue to Mission Avenue. Cost $2,500,000. This project is not funded. City share $388,000. 14. Valley Couplet — Project 3 Construct a one -way street from Evergreen Road to Sullivan Road. This will be the same width and number of lanes as the existing Appleway Blvd. between University and Evergreen. Project cost: $3,300,000. City share $489,000. 15. Bowdish Road - Construct a three -Lane urban arterial with curbs and sidewalks from 32 " Avenue to 8 Avenue. Cost approximately $2,980,000. City share $598,000. 16. Barker Road This project proposed to construct Barker Road to a three -lane section from 8t:11 Avenue to Broadway Avenue. Cost $3,053,000. City share $413,000. 17. Valley Couplet — Project 4 Extend the one -way Appleway Blvd. from Sullivan Road to Sprague Avenue at. Tschirley Road. This project will finish the couplet project. 18. Park Road This project would reconstruct Park Road from Broadway Avenue to Indiana Avenue. This will be a five -lane arterial with curbs and sidewalks linking Broadway Avenue to the new overpass at the BNSF tracks and Trent Avenue. 1.9. 32 " Avenue Reconstruct 32 " Avenue from SR 27 to Best R.oad (City limits). This road would be a three -lane arterial with curbs and sidewalks connecting to a County project at Best Road that will continue the improvement to Sullivan Road. 20. Ferret Avenue This project proposes to connect Ferret Avenue in Ponderosa to Dishman Mica Road. 21. Sullivan Road Reconstruct to seven lanes from Euclid Avenue to Wellesley Avenue. Widen bridges at the Spokane. River, UPRR. BNSF, and SR 290 (Trent). 22. Euclid Avenue/Flora Road This project is proposed to reconstruct and provide a 2 -lane, shouldered arterial on Euclid Avenue from Flora Road to Barker Road and on Flora Road from Euclid Road on the west to Euclid Road on the east. 2004 Project From 1 16th Avenue - Project 2' Dishman Mica Rd. SR 27 STP(U) 2 Park Road - Project 2' 8th Avenue 2nd Avenue AIP 3 Evergreen Road' 16Th Avenue 2nd Avenue AIP 4 Pities/Mansfield Wilbur Pines Road TPP Pines & Indiana West Bound Ramps 5 Barker Road' Boone Spokane River Br. AIP 6 Barker Road Bridge' at Spokane River #5503 BR 7 Bowdish & 24th Ave. Sidewalk Bowdish & 24th Ave. PSMP (Nolo: costs based on adopted TIP. Total dollar amounts may havo boen rovisod batted on 2003 UC.ivily.) 2005 Project 1 Bridging the Valley - Park Rd. 2 Pines/Mansfield 3 Barker Road' 4 Appleway Road 5 Park Road 6 Barker Road Bridge' 7 32nd Avenue 2006 Project 1 Bridging the Valley - Park Rd. 2 Barker Road' 3 Appleway Road 4 Barker Road 5 Evergreen Road 6 Park Road 7 32nd Avenue 8 Sullivan Road West Bridge 9 Barker Road Bridge' 10 Flora RoadlSR290 Minor Intersection Improvements 11 Barker RoadfSR290 Minor Intersection Improvements 2007 Project 1 Bridging the Valley - Park Rd. 2 Appleway Road 3 Barker Road 4 Evergreen Road 5 Park Road 6 32nd Avenue 7 Sullivan Road West Bridge 8 Barker Road 9 Flora Road 2008 Project 1 Barker Road , 2 Evergreen Road 3 Sullivan Road West Bridge 4 Barker Road 5 Valley Couplet - Project 3 6 Valley Couplet - Project 2 7 Flora Road 8 Bowdish Road 2009 Project 1 Barker Road 2 Valley Couplet - Project 3 3 Valley Couplet - Project 2 4 Flora Road 5 Bowdish Road 6 Valley Couplet - Project 4 7 Sullivan Road 8 Euclid Road/Flora Road City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Adopted Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2004 -2009 From Indiana Avenue Wilbur Pines & Indiana Boone Tshirley Road Broadway Ave. at Spokane River SR 27 From Indiana Avenue Boone Tshirley Road Spokane River 32nd Ave. Broadway Ave. SR 27 at Spokane River at Spokane River From Indiana Avenue Tshirley Road Spokane River 32nd Ave. Broadway Ave. SR 27 at Spokane River 8th Ave. Sprague Ave From Spokane River 32nd Ave. at Spokane River 8th Ave. Evergreen Rd. University Rd. Sprague Ave. 32nd Ave. From 8th Ave. Evergreen Rd. University Rd. Sprague Ave. 32nd Ave. Sullivan Rd. Euclid Ave. Flora Rd. • Grant hinds annroved " Additional grant funds required To Primary Source To Montgomery Ave. Pines Road West Bound Ramps Spokane River Br. Hodges Road Indiana Ave. #5503 Best Road To SR 290 16th Ave. #4511 -S Broadway Ave. Sullivan Rd. Evergreen Rd. Mission Ave. 8th Ave. To Broadway Ave. Sullivan Rd. Evergreen Rd. Mission Ave. 8th Ave. Appleway Rd. Wellesley Ave. Barker Rd. Primary Source Other State TPP AIP STP(U) AIP BR STP(U) City Amount Amount To Primary Source Montgomery Ave. Other State $ 331,000 Spokane River Br. AIP $ 279.000 Hodges Road STP(U) $ 254,000 SR 290 STP(U) $ 56,000 16th Ave. AIP $ 100,000 Indiana Ave. AIP $ 178,000 Best Road STP(U) $ 80,000 #4511 -S BR $ 87,000 #5503 BR $ 730,000 Other State S 2,000 Other State 8 3,000 $ 2,100,000 To Primary Source Montgomery Ave. Other State $ 249,000 Bodges Road STP(U) $ 360,000 SR 290 STP(U) $ 76,000 16th Ave. AIP $ 220,000 Indiana Ave. AIP $ 292,000 Best Road STP(U) $ 90,000 #4511 -S BR $ 757,000 Broadway Ave. STP(U) $ 228,000 Mission Ave. TPP $ 27,000 $ 2,319,000 Primary Source STP(U) $ 386,000 AIP $ BR $ 757,000 STP(U) S 142,000 STP(U) S 60,000 TPP $ 50,000 STP(U) $ 108,000 AIP $ 132,000 $ 1,655.000 $ 250.000 $ 1,932,000 $ 156,000 $ 782,000 $ 166,000 $ 831,000 $ 55,000 $ 675,000 $ 100,000 $ 502,000 $ 141,000 $ 702,000 S 51,000 $ 197,000 $ 929,000 $ 5,621.000 Amount 115,000 5 2,450,000 S 2,459,000 $ 221,000 $ 993,000 $ 60,000 $ 438,000 $ 73,000 $ 365,000 S 730,000 $ 3,649,000 $ 29,000 $ 213,000 S 1,228,000 $10,567,000 Amount $ 7,046,000 $ 1,059,000 $ 1,876,000 $ 418,000 $ 500,000 $ 890,000 $ 592,000 $ 435,000 $ 3,649,000 $ 13,000 $ 12,000 $16,490,000 Amount S 5,296,000 S 2,813,000 $ 562,000 $ 1,120,000 S 1,460,000 $ 667,000 $ 3,783,000 $ 517,000 $ 200,000 816.418,000 Amount $ 2,858,000 $ 880,000 $ 3,783,000 S 1,050,000 $ 274,000 $ 822,000 $ 800,000 $ 659,000 $11,126,000 Primary Source Amount STP(U) $ 271,000 $ 2,003,000 STP(U) $ 148,000 $ 1,095,000 TPP $ 50,000 $ 822,000 STP(U) $ 203,000 $ 1,500,000 AIP $ 210,000 S 1,048,000 STP(U) $ 54,000 S 404.000 City $ 93,000 S 93,000 City $ 50,000 S 50,000 $ 1,079,000 5 7,015,000 2005 Protect 1 Barker Road 2 Barker Road Bridge 3 Pines/Mattstiekl 4 Appleway Road 5 Sullivan Road Neat) Ertl. 6 8th Avenue 7 Broadway Ave. Rehab_ 8 Wellesley Ave. Rehab. 9 Park Road Rehab. 10 Dishman d.Gca Road Rehab. 2006 Projeet 1 Barker Road 2 Starker Road Bridge 3 Pines/Mansfield 4 0th Avenue 5 Suf:)van Road North Exi. 6 Appleirey Read 7 Valley Couplet • Project 6 Evergreen Road �+ Bridging She Vaiey - Pad; Rd. 10 Barker Road City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works DRAFT Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 -2010 Prom Boone at Spokane River !Art!bur Pines 8 Indiana TShIAey Road Porker & Progress ilavana Bares Rd Sunnyvale Rd Sprague Ave. 1st Ave. From Boone at Spokane River Wilbur Havana Forker 8 Progress Tshirloy Road University Rd 32nd Ave_ Indiana A.venue Spokane River To Spokane River Br. #5503 Pines Road West Bound Ramps Hodges Road Wellesley Ave Park Road Sullivan Rd Flora Rd. Broadway Ave. STP(U) S 30,000 TPP 9 5,000 STP(U) $ 153,000 STP(U) $ 110.000 STP(U) 5 47,000 STP(Ut S 22.000 Sprague Ave. STP(U I $ 7.000 $ 817,000 To Primary Source Spokane River Br. AIP #5503 BR Pines Road TPP Park Road STP(U) Wellesley Ave_ TPP Hodges Road STP(U) Evergreen Pd. TPP 16th Ave. AIP Montgomery Ave. Other State Euclid Ave_ STP(U) 11 Sullivan Road West Bridge at Spokane River #4511 -S BR 12 Flora Road I@ SR290 Minor Intersection Improvements Other State 2007 Project 1 Barker Road Bridge 2 8th Avenue 3 Sullivan Road north Exi, 4 Aoplevray Road 5 Valley Coul:b?I - Protect 2 6 Evergreen Road 7 Bridging the Valley - Park Rd. B Barker Road 9 Sullivan Road West Bridge 10 Barker Road 11 Flora Road 2008 Project 1 Barker Road Bridge 2 Sullivan Road Korth Exi 3 Volley Couplet - Project 2 4 Evergreen Road 5 Bridging the Valle, - Park Rd. 6 Barker Road 7 Sullivan Road West Bridge 8 Barker Road 9 Valley Couplet - Project 3 10 Flora Road 11 Bowdish Road 2009 Project i Valley Couplet - Project 2 2 Barker Road 3 Valley Couplet - Project 3 4 Flom Road 5 Bowdish Road 6 Valley Couplet - Project 4 T P2i1 8 Euclid Road / Flora Road .gin r Aveilil6 2010 Project 1 VeUey Couplet - Project 3 2 Bowdish Road 3 Park Road 4 Euclid Road 1 Flora Road 5 32nd Avenue 5 Ferret Avenue 7 Valley Couplet - Project 4 8 Sullivan Road Funded Projects Added From at Spokane River Havana Porker & Progress Tshfiley Road University Rd. 32nd Ave_ Indiana Avenue Spokane River at Spokane River 8th Ave. Sprague Ave. From at Spokane River Fortier & Progress University Rd. 32nd Ave_ Indiana :'.venue Spokane River al Spokane River 81h Ave. Evergreen Rd. Sprague Ave. 32nd Ave. From To Primary Source Amount University Rd. Evergreen Rd. TPP 5 022,000 $ 2,505,000 8th Ave. Broadway Ave. STP(U) 5 271.000 5 2,003,000 Evergreen Rd. Sullivan Rd. STP(U) $ 148,000 5 1,095,000 Sprague Ave. Mission Ave. STP(U) 5 203,000 $ 1,500,000 32nd Ave. 8th Ave. AIP 5 210,000 $ 1,048,000 Sullivan Rd. Appleway Rd. STP(U) 5 54,000 5 404,000 B : :!I.'.a;A•._ ir,'58r31.r.. ;Al C• :.00? S :1iE.4J0 Flora to Barker Euclid to Euclid TPP 5 50,000 $ 50,000 r, =s• From Evergreen Rd. 32nd Ave, Broadway Ave. Flora to Barker SR27 Ponderosa Dr. Sullivan Rd_ Euclid Ave. To Projects R escn8 iuI '. 15503 Park Road Wellesley Ave. Hodges Road Evergreen Rd 16th Ave. Montgomery Ave_ Euclid Ave. #4511 -S Broadway Ave. Mission Ave. Primary Source City Amnt AIP 5 215.000 BR 5 TPP $ 28,000 Primary Source BR $ - STP(U) $ 245.000 TPP $ 35.000 STP(U) 5 223,000 TPP 5 50.000 AIP $ 400,000 Other Fed- $ STP(U) S 25,000 BR S STP(U) $ 70,000 STP(U) $ 27,000 $ 1,078,000 To Primary Source #5503 BR $ - Wellesley Ave TPP 3 18,000 Evergreen Rd. TPP S 993,000 16th Ave. AIP $ M0ntgornery Ave inner Fec 5 - Euclid Ave. STP(U) $ 129,000 #4511 -S BR $ - Broadway Ave, STP(U) $ 142,000 Sullivan Rd. STP(U) $ 80,000 Mission Ave. STP(U) 5 108,000 8th Ave. AIP S 132,000 $ 1,602,000 Total Project S 1,114,000 5 234,000 $ 1,777,000 3 216,000 5 327,000 $ 1.136,000 $ 812,000 5 344.000 3 164,000 $ 41,000 $ 6,165.000 Amount $ 253.000 5 1,394,000 $ $ 2:54.000 3 $ 1,506.000 5 245,000 S 1,820,000 $ 1,000 S 96.000 $ 180,000 5 1,331,000 5 50.000 5 e22.000 S 100,000 $ 500.000 5 2.450000 $ 18,000 $ 140,000 S $ 435,000 $ 2,000 $ 13.000 $ 849,000 510,741,000 Amount $ 3,649,000 3 1,820,000 $ 2.419,000 $ 1,650,000 S 822 000 $ 1,120,000 S 7,047,000 $ 188,000 $ 3,783,000 $ 517.000 5 200,000 523,214,000 Amount S 3,649,000 $ 1,189,000 $ 4,227,000 $ 880,000 5.:'9i 3 959,000 $ 3,783,000 $ 1,050.000 5 274,000 $ 800,000 $ 859,000 522,766,000 $ 1,660,000 $ 9,183,000 To Primary Source Amount Sullivan Rd. STP(U) S 261,000 $ 1,932,000 81h Ave_ AIP $ 256,000 5 1,277,000 Indiana Ave. AIP $ 178,000 £ 890,000 Euclid to Euclid TPP S 550,000 $ 550,000 Best Rd. STP(U) S 80,000 5 592,000 Dishman Mica Rd_ City $ 710,000 $ 710.000 Appleway Rd. STP(U) $ 51,000 $ 375.000 WellesteyAve. City 3 93.000 $ 93,000 5 2,179,000 $ 6,419,000 8/1/2004 1:05 P81 DESCRIPTION OF' PROPOSAL: The 2005 — 2010 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and 2005 Annual construction Program identifies road projects required to accommodate current and future public transportation needs in the City of Spokane. Valley. The TIP is a guide for the planning and implementation of road construction work. The Annual Construction Program is a listing of those projects proposed for construction during 2005. Both programs contain capital improvement projects on existing facilities. Both programs are consistent with the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and Regional Transportation Plan as adopted by the City of Spokane Valley. The TIP is updated annually for adoption by the Spokane Valley City Council. :REARING DATE AND TIME: June 22, 2004 at 5:00 P.M APPLICANT: City of Spokane Valley DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNI.F1CANCE - "DNS" WAC 197 -11 -970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKANE ENVIR.ONMENTAL ORDINANCE LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The 2005 — 20.10 Transportation Improvement Program and 2005 Annual Construction Program contains projects for the transportation system within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley. LEAD AGENCY: City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under VAC 197 -11- 340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 14 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m., June 18, 2004, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Neil Kersten, ATA, Public Works Director Attention: Steve M. Worley, P.E., Senior Engineer (CIP) City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 921 -1000 DATE ISSUED: June 4, 2004 :SIGNATURE: COMMENTS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT THE HEARING. APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department, Spokane Valley, WA 99206. The appeal deadline is fourteen (14) calendar days after issuance of this determination. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. City of Spokane Valley, Community Development Department 3. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red 4. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby 5. Washington State Department of Transportation; Mark Rohwer 6. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 7. Water Districts ENVIRONM ENTA CHECKLEST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 1 1 . 1 0.2 30 [ 1 ] Updated November 19, 2002 (WAC 197 -11 -985) Section 11.10130(5) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Environmental Checklist Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SI-IEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as " proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A, BACKGROUND . 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2005 - 2010 Transportation Improvement Program, 2005 Annual Construction Program 2. Name of applicant City of Spokane Va11ey 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: Attn: Steve M. Worley, P.E. , Senior Engineer (CEP), City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department, 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Spokane Valley Washington 99206, 509- 921 -1000 4. Date checklist prepared: June 1, 2004 PALL 2 OF 13 (WAC 197 - - 955) Section 11.10.230(5) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Spokane Valley, Washington 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Projects for 2005 through 2010 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? 1f yes, explain. Yes. The 2005 - 2010 Transportation Plan is the initial implementation of all the project environmental processes and more specific data will be provided on a project -by- project basis. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. Yes. Most projects lie within and adjacent to city owned right -of -way. S. List any environmental information you Mow about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to his proposal. Several projects will have Environmental Assessments or Environmental Impact Statements prepared during project development. Existing environmental documents are on file with either the City of Spokane Valley, Public Works Department, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington or Spokane County Public Works Department, Division of Engineering and Roads at 1026 W. Broadway Avenue in Spokane, Washington. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? if yes, explain. No 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. a) City of Spokane Valley Council Resolution b) Interagency agreements where applicable 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You. do not need to repeat those answers on this page. The 2005 - 2010 Transportation Plan is a planning document used to schedule projects for maintaining and expanding the City's transpor infrastructure. This document schedules projects for a six -year period and is updated annually and provides the necessary documentation to submit applications to obtain grant funds and expend dollars on transportation related projects. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. The proposal consists of many projects within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley, including some projects which are to be coordinated with the Spokane County and the Washington State Department of Transportation. PAGE 3 OF 13 (WAC 197 -11 -985) Section 11.10.230(5) 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane Cou.nty's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries.) The proposal includes projects that are within one or more of the listed areas. 14. The following questions supplement Part A. a. Critical Aquifer Recharge Area (CARA) / Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) (1) (2) (3) 1. Earth SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary. waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of stormwater or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of material likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter. the- system inadvertently through spills or as a result of firefighting activities). • Disposal of new stormwater runoff (drainage) will be accomplished through the use of "208" swales and drywells and oil /water separators where allowed by the regulating authority. Some road iaprovements may utilize existing drywells. The use of existing drywells will be reviewed on a project -by- project basis. Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in aboveground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of material will be stored? • Non- project, does not apply What protective measures will be taken to insure that Teaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater? This includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems. Project specifications will follow local guidelines to insure that protective measures are taken. (4) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a stormwater disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? Project specifications will follow local guidelines to insure protective measures are taken. b. Storrnwater (1) What are the depths on the site to groundwater and to bedrock (if known)? Non - project, does not apply (2) Will stormwater be discharged into the ground? If so, describe any potential impacts? Non - project, does not apply TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT 13. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS PAGE 4 OF 13 Evaluation £^r Agency Us; Only 2. Air SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197 -11 -985) Section 11.10.230(5) a. General description of the site (circle one): flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountains, other The geographic area includes all of the listed types of terrain. b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? Non- project, does not apply c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prune farmland. Non - project, does not apply d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. Non - project, does not apply e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill: Non project, does not apply f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Non - project, does not apply g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? Non - project, does not apply h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion or other impacts to the earth, if any: Non- project, does not apply a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Non project, does not apply b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generallydescribe. Non - project, does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: Non - project, does not apply 3. Water a. SURFACE: (1) is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what s or river it flows into. Several surface water bodies are located within the City of Spokane Valley. The projects listed in the 2005 - 2010 Transportation Improvement Program may be PAGE 5 OF 13 Evaluation for Acency Use Only (WAC 197 - 11 - 985) Section 11.10.230(5) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. Some projects are adjacent to and may cross the surface water bodies within the City of Spokane Valley. ( (5) within the immediate vicinity of one or more of these.:: surface water bodies. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or • removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. Non - project, does not apply (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Potential diversions m ay occur during bridge construction projects. Generally, diversions will be temporary for the placement of bridge footings and piers. Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. Certain areas of the City of Spokane Valley have been designated as 100 -year flood plains. (6) Does the proposal involve any discharge of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. No discharges are anticipated. b. GROUND: (1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. Non - project, does not apply (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic . tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. • Non - project, does not apply c. WATER RUNOFF (INCLUDING STORiVIWATER): PACs 6 0P 13 (1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of - collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Within the Aquifer Sensitive Area surface water runoff will be handled in accordance with the 208 disposal procedures; where feasible. See 14.a(1)above. Evaluation for Agency Use Only Evaluation for Agency Uses Only (WAC 197 -11 -985) Section 11.10.230(5) 4. Plants SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Could waste materials eater ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. Project specifications will follow local guidelines to insure protective measures are taken. d. PROPOSED MEASURES to reduce or confrol surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any. Within the Aquifer Sensitive Area, surface water runoff will be handled in accordance with the 208 disposal procedures, . where feasible. a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site: Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other. Shrubs Grass Pasture Crop or grain Wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. Water plants: water Iflly eelgrass, milfoil, other. Other types of vegetation. This proposal includes projects that may contain one or more of the above listed types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? Non - project, does not apply c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non - project, however, lists will be requested on a project - by- project basis. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: Non- project, does not apply 5. Animals a. Circle arty birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: other: This proposal includes projects where one or more of the above listed animals may be on or near the project loca tion. PAGE 7 OF 13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only (WAC 197 -11 -985) Section 11.10.230(5) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDLNANCE b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Non - project, however, lists will be requested on a project -by- project basis. c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. This proposal includes projects throughout the City of Spokane Valley where migration routes may exist. Specific routes will be addressed on a project -by- project basis. d.. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: Non - project, does not apply 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds or energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. Electricity may be used on same projects once the infrastructure is complete to provide street lighting and traffic signal operation. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. In general, the individual transportation projects should not affect the potential use of solar energy. Evaluation for c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this Agency Use proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy Only impacts, if any: Recycling of existing asphalt, which may be removed during some projects, is utilized where possible. Some projects encourage the use of alternative transportation by the inclusion of bike lanes, sidewalks, and trails for bikes /walkers and transit related projects are included. 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. Non - project, does not apply (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. Non- project, does not apply (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: Some projects encourage the use of alternative transportation by the inclusion of bike lanes, sidewalks, PAGL 8 OF 13 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197 -11 -985) Section 11.10.230(5) trails for bikes /walkers and transit related projects are included. b. NOISE: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? Non- project, does not apply (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or a long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. Most projects will improve congestion, which will reduce carbon monoxide (CO) emissions. (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Follow local noise ordinances. B. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Non - project, does not apply b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. Non - project, does not apply c. Describe any structures on the site. Non - project, does not apply d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? Non - project, does not apply e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Non - project, does not apply f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Current comprehensive plan designations vary throughout the project locations. g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? Non project, does not apply h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area? If so, specify. Any effects to environmentally sensitive areas will be addressed in the individual project environmental documents. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Non- project, does not apply PAGE 9 OF 13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only (WAC 197-11-985) Section 11.10.230(5) j. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? Non - project, does not apply k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: Non- project, does not apply Evaluation for 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and Agency Use projected land uses and plans, if any: Only Non - project, does not apply 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle or low- income housing. The proposed projects do not include increasing housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high -, middle- or low - income housing. Non- project, does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: Non - project, does riot apply 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Non - project, does not apply b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? Non - project, does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Non - project, does not apply 11. Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? Non - project, does not apply b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? Non - project, does not apply c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Off -site sources of light usually do not affect transportation projects. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: _ Non - project, does not apply 12. Recreation PAGE 10 or 13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only (WAC 197-11 -955) Section 1110.230(5) SPOKANE En \TIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Non - project, does not apply b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. Non - project, does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: Non - project, does not apply 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. Any affects to historical or culturally sensitive areas will be addressed in the individual project environmental documents. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. Non - project, does not apply c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: Project impacts will be avoided or mitigated where possible during project design. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. All projects in the 200.5 - 2010 Transportation Improvement Program are related to public roadways and are part of the local transportation infrastructure. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Yes. The Spokane Transit Authority maintains a number of routes on many of the roads contained in the proposal. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? The proposal contains improvements to roadways where parking may or may not be allowed along the roadway. The amount of parking created or deleted is project specific. d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not including driveways? if so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). All proposed projects in the 2005 - 2010 Transportation Improvement Program are related to the improvement and /or development of new and existing roads and bridges. PAGE 11 OF13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only (WAC 197-11-985) Section 11.10.230(5) g. 15. Public services 16. Utilities C. SIGNATURE SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail or air transportation? If so, generally describe. Some of the projects will occur in the immediate vicinity of water, in particular the bridge projects. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. Does not apply. (Note: to assist in review and if ;mourn indicate vehicle trips during PM peak, AM Peak and Weekday (24 hours).) Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: _ Non - project, does not apply. a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. All transportation projects will require maintenance by the public agency. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: The proposed transportation improvement program will help reduce impacts through congestion relief and safety improvements. a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. All of the above utilities are generally located within the City of Spokane Valley. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. Coordination with all utilities takes place during the adoption of the six -year program and during design of individual projects to minimize the disruption of traffic and to maximize the cost savings. I, the undersigned, swear under penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of hill disclosure on my part, the agency must withdraw any determination of Nonsignificance that it might issue m reliance upon this checklist. PAGE= 120F 13 Evaluation for Agency Use Only (WAC 197-1 1-985) Section 11,1 0.230(5) Phone: 509- 921 -1000 Phone: 509- 688 -0191 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE Date: June 1, 2004 Signature: Please Print or Type: Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Address: 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 Person completing form (if different from proponent): Steve M. Worley, P.E. Address: Same as above FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff concludes that A. there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a Determination of Nonsignificance. B. probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance with conditions. C. there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a Determination of Significance. PAGE 13 or 13 Spok � • City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Draft 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Annual Construction Program Functional Classification: Rural: 7 Major Collector 8 Minor Collector 9 Access Urban: 14 Principal 16 Minor 17 Collector 19 Access Program Item Number: A number assigned for tracking purposes Work Method: C- Indicates work is to be done by contract 0- Indicates work to be done by City forces. N- Indicates a non - capital project. Environmental: S- Significant Impacts under SEPA anticipated I- Insignificant Environmental Impact anticipated Work Typos: New construction Relocation Reconstruction Major Widening Minor Widening Other Enhancements New Bridge Const Bridge Replacement Bridge Rehabilitation Minor Bridge Rehab Safety/Traffic Oper/TSM Environmentally Related 01 02 03 04 05 06 08 09 10 11 12 13 GLOSSI." ',1ND ABBREVIATIONS i Bridge Program Special Transit Capital Project Transit Operational Project Transit Planning Transit training /Admin Non - Capital Improve. Non Motor Vehicle 14 21 22 23 24 31 32 CO: Box is checked if the project Iles within the Carbon Monoxide non - attainment area Fund Status: S- Project is subject to funding selection P- Project is listed for planning purposes only UtII Code: Utilities that would be impacted by the project: C Cable TV G Gas 0 Other P Power S Sewer T Telephone W Water Funding Sources: Federal assistance: These funds are authorized under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21" Century (TEA - 21) and are administered by the Federal Highway Administration through the Washington State Department of Transportation and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (SRTC). f3$- Bridge replacement projects CMAQ- Congestion Management and Air Quality Other Fed- Other federal hinds, SIP- Surface Transportation Program. Individual funds are designated by the betters h parenthesis that follow the initials "STP °: (U) Urban improvements (R) Rural improvements (C) Competitive funding (E) Enhancement improvement (S) Safety improvements State assistanco: TPP, AIP, and PSMP are administered by the Transportation Improvement Board. RAP and CAPP are administered by the County Road Administration Board TPP- Transportation Partnership Program AIP- Arterial Improvement Program PSMP: Pedestrian Safety Mobility Program RAP- Rural Arterial Program CAPP- County Arterial Preservation Program Other State- Other state funds Local funding: LID Bonds are sold to finance the constriction of local roads. This funding is administered by Spokane County. Private funds are paid by private companies or individuals for various reasons, usually for commercial reasons. L10 Bonds- Road Improvement District funding from private property owners. Private- Funds from other private sources. SUMMARY 2005 PROGRAM is responsible ANNIn STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM The CONSTRUCTION onsible for the improvement ement of the Sheet S - r p p C?y System, ANNUAL and SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS are prepared and updated oath year. Prbdty programming is used to select project.- for improvement. Funds for the 2005 ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM come from the following soteces: Source Amount (1000's) City Pedant Slate Other Total Cointruction Project 1 Pincs/Mansrcld 3 Barker Rd Reconstruct - Boone to Spokane Riv Boeno $616 $3,153 $2,175 $246 $6,190 2005 Major Construction Project Summary From To Wilbur Road Pin= 8 Indiana Pines Road West bound on ramp to 190 2 Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) Falter Road 8 Progress I Wellesley Road Spokane Rivet Bridge 4 Appleway Road Tschadey Road Hodges Road 5 8th Avenue Reoonstnxtion Havana Street Park Road 6 Broadway Avenue Rehabilitation Bates Road Sullivan Road 7 Wellesley Avenue Rehabilitation Sunnyvale Road Flora Road 8 Park Road Rehabilitation Sprague Avenue Broadway Avenuo 9 Barker Road Bridge Q Spokane River #5503 Note: For each CITY dollar spent, a total of $10.0 of CONSTRUCTION will be accomplished. Primary Source Amount TPP 51,852,00D 5327,000 51,114,000 5216,000 51,136,000 5812,000 5344,000 5164,000 5234.000 TPP AIP STP(U) STP(U) STP(U) STP(U) STP(U) BR The CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM is responsible for the improvement of the City Street System, , UAL and SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS are re arcd and updated each P P P year. Priority programming is used to salad improvement Funs for the 2000 ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM mrne from the toflowMg sous Sourco City Fedora! State Other Total Construction SUMMARY 2006 ANNH L STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Amount (1000's) $936 $6,415 $2,965 $411 $10,727 2006 Major Construction Project Summary Note: For each CITY dollar spent, a total of $11.4 of CONSTRUCTION will be acccmplished. Project From To Primary Source Amount 1 Pines/Atansfeid Wilbur Road Pines Road TPP $1,506,000 Pines & Indiana West bound on ramp to 1 90 2 Bridging the Valley- Park Road/ BNSF Grade Se Indiana Avenue Montgomery Ave. Other Fed $2.450,000 3 81h Avenue Reconstruction Havana Street Park Road STP(U) $1,620,000 4 Appleway Road Tschirloy Road Hodges Road STP(U) $1,331,000 5 Evergreen Road 32nd Avenue 16th Avenue AIP 5500,000 6 Barker Rd Reconstruct - Boone to Spokane Riv Boone Spokane River Bridge AIP $1,394,000 7 Valley Couplet - Project 2 University Rd Evergreen Rd TPP $822,000 University Rd Evergreen Rd 8 Barker Road Bridge © Spokane River #5503 BR $234,000 9 Sullivan Road West Bridge g Spokane River #45115 BR $435,000 SUMMARY 2007 ANI ∎, STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM ` J ' i •\ �; A r N.,___,/ The CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM c respons3lo for to improvement of tho City Street System. ANNUAL and SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS are prepared and updated each year. Priority programming used to select projects for imrprovemeni. Funds for the 2007 ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM come from the following sources: Source Amount (1000's) City Federal State Other Total Construction Project S1,833 517,4$7 $3,176 $352 $22,848 2 Bridging the Vaney- Park Road/ BNSF Grade Se Indiana Avenue 3 8th Avenue Reconstruction Havana Street 4 Valley Couplet - Project 2 University Rd University Rd 2007 Major Construction Project Summary From Note: For each CITY dollar spent, a total of 512.4 of CONSTRUCTION will be accomplished. To Primary Source Amount 1 Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) Porker Road & Progress I Wefesley Road TPP $2,418,000 Montgomery Ave. Park Road Evergreen Rd Evergreen Rd Other Fed STP(U) TPP 57,047.000 51,820,000 5822,000 5 Appleway Road Tsdiirtey Road Hodges Road STP(U) $1.650,000 6 Barker Road - Spokane River to Euclid Avenue Spokane River Euclid Avenue STP(U) $188,000 7 Evergreen Road 32nd Avenue 16th Avenue AIP $1,120,000 8 Barker Road - Bth to Broadway Avenue 8th Avenue Broadway Avenue STP(U) 5517,000 9 Flora Road Sprague Av Mission Av TPP 5200,000 10 Barker Road Bridge © Spokane River #5503 BR 53.649,000 SUMMARY 2007 AR! " ")!1L STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 11 Sulivan Road West Bridge @ Spokane River #4511 -5 BR $3,783,000 The CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM is resportsstte for the Improvement of the City Street System Arend. and SIX YEAR COKSTRLtC'If10N PROGRAMS are prepared and updated each yoar. Priority programming is used to select projects for improvement, Funds for the 2008 ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM como from tho folloviing sources: Source Amount (1000's) City Federal State Other Total Construction Project 1 Valley Couplet - Proied 2 3 Evergreen Road SUMMARY 2008 ANNn STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM $2,359 $14,501 S5,461 S265 $22,586 2008 Major Construction Project Summary From University Rd University Rd To Note: For each CITY dollar spent, a total of 59.57 of CONSTRUCTION will be accomplished. Primary Source Amoun TPP $4,227,000 $1,189,000 $880,000 $1,050,000 $959,000 STP(U) 5274,000 TPP $800.000 Other Fed $5,296,000 AIP 5659,000 BR $3.783,000 Evergreen Rd Evergreen Rd 2 Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) Forker Road 8 Progress I Wellesley Road 32nd Avenue 16th Avenue 4 Barker Road - 8th to Broadway Avenue 8th Avenue Broadway Avenue 5 Barker Road - Spokane River to Euclid Avenue Spokane River Euclid Avenue 6 Valley Couplet - Project 3 Evergreen Road Sullivan Road 7 Flora Road Sprague Av Mission Av 6 Bridging the Valley- Park Road( BNSF Grade Se Indiana Avenue Montgomery Ave. 9 Bowdish Road 32nd Avenue 8th Avcrwo 10 Sullivan Road West Bridge El Spokane River 04511 -S TPP AIP STP(U) STP(U) SUMMARY 2008 ANM! L STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 11 Barker Road Bridge @ Spokane River 115503 BR $3,649,00 Source City Federal State Other Total Conr„nwction SUMMARY 2009 ANNh STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM The CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Is reiomible ror the iniccovemerd of the City Sirext System. ANrll,Al. and SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS are prepared and updated each year. Priority programming is used to sheet pro)eels for inprovcrnont. Funds for the 2DD9 ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM come from the following sources: Amount (1000's) $1,640 S3,780 $3,763 $0 59.183 2009 Major Construction Project Summary Note: For each CITY dollar spent, a total of $5.60 of CONSTRUCTION will be accomplished. Protect From To Primary Source Amount 1 Valley Couplet- Proted 4 SuEven Road Appleway Road STP(U) 5404,000 2 Valley Couplet • Project 2 University Rd Evergreen Rd TPP 52,505,000 University Rd Evergreen Rd 3 Park Road Broadway Av Indiana Av AIP $365,000 4 Valley Couplet - Project 3 Evergreen Road Sullivan Road STP {U) 51,095.000 5 Flora Road Sprague Av Mission Av TPP 51,500,000 6 32nd Avenue SR 27 Best Road STP(U) 5213,000 7 Bowdish Road 32nd Avenue 8th Avenue AIP $1,048,000 8 Barker Road - 8th to Broadway Avenue 881 Avenue Broadway Avenue STP(U) 52.003,000 SUMMARY 2010 ANKII IAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM The CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM is responsible for tho improvement of the City Street Syster; JAL and SIX YEAR CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS aro prepamed and updated each year. Priority programming Ls used to select prof_: _ ::mprovemenL Funds for tho 20W ANNUAL STREET CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM comp from tho following sources: Source Amount (1000's) C y $2,179 Fedoral $2,507 Stato $1,733 Other $0 Total Construction $6,419 2010 Major Construction Project Summary Note: For each CITY dollar spent, a total of $2.95 of CONSTRUCTION will be accomplished. Project From To Primary Source Amount 1 Valley Couplet- Project 4 Sullivan Road Appleway Road STP(U) $375,000 2 Valley Couplet - Project 3 Evergreen Road Sullivan Road STP(U) $1.932,000 3 Ferret Avenue Pondoro:a Drive Dishman Wm Road City $710,000 4 Euclid Rd/ Flora Rd Flora Road Barter Road City $550,000 Euclid Road Euclid Road 5 Park Road Broadway Av Indiana Av AIP $690,000 6 Bovdish Road 32nd Avenue 6th Avenuo AIP $1.277,000 7 32nd Avenue SR 27 Best Road STP(U) $52,000 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope nom Class Status Street Improvements City of Spwa <e Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Annual Construction Program Dollars In thousands From PincrJMansfictd I 03 0 P 09 Mansfield Ave Wilbur Road Pines Road 02964 0.00 14 Pines Rd Pines a Indiana Wcst bound on ramp 0.00 This pro)ect wit reconfigure the WI3 ramps of 1.93 al SR27. It will also widen and reconstruct Mansfield Ave. from W bur Rd. to SR27 to a Nano roadway with curb, gutter Prelim. Engineering. Right -et -Way, Construction 2 Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) S 03 i P TGP 05 Bigelow Gulch Road Fortier Road 8 Progress Wellesley Road 03783 0.91 3 Rmwconstmcl and widen the Sullivan Road extension north also known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4-lane roadway with 8400t shor.0ders and n 12 -toot two way left tum Zone. Prelim- Engineering, R ght-ot -Way Barker Rd Reconstruct • Boono to Spokane River 1 03 U P 14 Barker Rood Boone Spokane Riser Bldg 00230 0,09 Reconstruct to a four -fano curbcd artorial Wth center tum lane. Right- of-Way, Comnlradion Printed: 5/23/2004 1 hfcaring Date: Env. Assess. Date Adoptlo,]' • Resolution tto. Envir Work C Fund Work Utilities Fcd Stale Other City To Read # Prol Len(mi) Type 0 Stat Meth Fund Scurro Funds Funds Fluids Funds P.E. R.W. Coast Total C City 27 15 12 0 27 C TPP 1,060 95 200 705 1,060 C STP(U) 499 0 0 490 499 C Other Ste 28 25 3 0 28 C Other 238 0 0 239 238 C City C AIP C Other 891 135 275 1,442 1,852 C City 5 4 1 0 5 C County 44 6 0 50 C TPP 196 173 23 0 198 C STP(U) 76 67 9 0 76 288 39 0 327 215 0 130 85 215 0 520 371 891 8 0 0 8 8 0 850 464 1,114 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Item Class Status 4 Apploway Road 5 03 ® P CPT 5 6 14 Appleway Road RoconsUud to a five -lane urban arterial Prelim. Engineering, Right -of -Way 8th Avenue Reconstruction 16 Blh Avenue Reconstruct 6111 Ave. to a three tano section with curb, gutter, sidcwaAcs and h&c lanes. Prelim. Engineering, Right- or-Way Broadway Avenue Rehabilitation 14 Broadway Avenue Bates Road Str6ranRoad 0324 2.47 Grind and overlay 2.46 miles, scr wide, 4 lanes to a depth of 2' from mile marker 4.58 to Sullivan Road. Prelim. Engineering, Construction 7 Wellostoy Avanuo Rehabilitation 1 06 tJ S 16 Wellesley Avenue Remove, replace and widen 0.33 miles of roa 9Aay. Prelim. Engineering, Construction City of S. ;Ine Valley Department oi"rublic Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands From Havana Street Printed: 5282004 2 Hearing Dale: Ado Env. Assess. Date Rcso' • . Envir Work C Fund Work UtLTiios Fed State Other City To Road 0 Pali 0 Len(i) Typo 0 Slat Moth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. RW. Const Total Tschirtey Rood Hodges Road 00031 1.26 Sunnyvale Road Flora Road 05249 0.27 C City C STP(U) 188 I 03 r! S CTPGSW Park Road 0,00 C C3y C STP(U) 993 30 14 16 0 30 86 100 0 186 100 118 0 218 153 39 114 0 153 252 731 0 983 291 845 0 1,136 C City C STP(U) 702 110 11 0 99 110 70 0 632 702 81 0 731 812 C City 47 5 0 42 47 C STP(U) 297 30 0 267 287 35 0 303 344 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Item Ctass Status 9 Park Road Rehabilitation 15 Park Road From Grind it overlay 0.5 miles, 32 wide, 2 Fonts to a depth of 2 in+chestrom Sprague Avenue to Broadway Avenue. Prelim. Engineering, Construction Dishman-0tica Road Rehabilitation 14 Di,hman -Mica Road Rehabilitation 1st Avenue Remove and replace 0.09 miles, 62' who (2 Lanes) b a depth oa 2". Prelim Engineering, Construction Street Improvements Prefects Total: City of Sp,:ue Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands Envir Work C Fund Walk Ut$ies Fed Santo Oder City To Rand d Prof p Len(lid) Type 0 Stat moth Fund Source Farads Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W, Cwrsi Total 0a .�/]. S Sprague Avenue Broadway Avenue 03714 0.50 Sprague Avonvo 00679 0.02 Prinled: 5/28x2004 3 S C CAly C STP(U) 142 Hearing Date: Env. Assess. Dente Adnptio"1`•1 Resolution No. 22 2 0 20 22 t4 0 128 142 15 0 140 164 C City 7 1 0 5 7 C STP(U) 34 3 0 31 34 4 0 37 41 2.919 2,175 246 616 650 1,925 3,131 6,005 Project Namo Road Names Program Func Work Scope Item Class Status Bridge Construction 10 Barker Road Bridge 14 Barker Road Replace bridge over the Spokane River. Prelim. Engcrccring, Right- ot-Way City of , ane Valley Department of Pu blic Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2005 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands From ® Spokane River 85503 Bridge Con 1nrclion Projects Total: 234 Toed Program for 2005 3,153 2,175 246 816 1,169 1,940 3,131 6,240 Printed: 5J2812004 4 Hearing Date: Ade o: Env. Assess. Data Envy Work C Fund Work llttl4les Fed Slate Other City To Road 4 Proj 4 Len(r Type 0 Stat Meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Con Total 1 09 ❑ P T 0.10 C BR C BR 187 47 175 12 0 187 44 3 0 47 219 15 0 234 219 15 0 234 Progcd Namo Road Names Program Func Work Soapo tom Class Status Street Improvements Printed: 5!2812004 From Pines/Mansfield 09 Mansfield Ave Wilbur Road Pines Road 02964 0.00 14 Pcres Rd Pines 8 Indiana West bound on ramp 0.00 This pro(ed wil mconfigu o the WB ramps of 1 -90 at SR27. It will also w den and reconstruct Mansfield Avo. from Wilbur Rd. to SR27 to a 3-lane roadway with curb. gutter Construction Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) S 03 ✓ P TGP 08 B'gotow Gulch Road Fortier Road 8 Progress Welesley Road Rewoonstr ct and widen the Sullivan Road extension north atso known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4.lane r ond'n:ry with 8-ford shoulders and a 12400t Oro way Fell tum lane. Right- ot•Way Bridging tho Valley- Park Road! BNSF Grade Sep 14 Park Road Indbna Avenue Montgomery Avo. 03714 020 Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of Park Road and the BNSF railroad tracks, Prelim. Engineering, Righlo1 -Wey, Construction City of Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2006 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands Emir Wore C Fimd Work Utilities Fed State Other City To Road t: Pro) 8 Lon(rn� Type 0 Stat MVirth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds 03788 0.81 5 I 03 P I 03I1S C TPP C STP(U) 468 C Other Sin C Other C City C TPP C County C STP(U) 23 Flooring Dato: Adoseio'll- Env. Assess. Date Resolution No. 778 0 P,E, R.W. Const Total O 0 778 778 O 0 486 466 O 0 0 0 262 0 0 282 262 0 0 1,505 1,506 1 0 1 0 1 58 0 55 0 58 0 14 0 14 O 23 0 23 O 96 0 96 C Other Fed 2204 944 1,289 0 2,204 C Other Sta 123 53 70 0 123 C Other 123 53 70 0 123 1,050 1,400 0 2,480 Project name Road Namos Program Fune Work Scopo Item Class Status Reconstruct 8th Ave. to a throe lano soction with curb, gutter, sldevrn0:s and bike lanes. Con:Anrdion 5 Appleway Road 14 Apoloway Road Reconstruct to a five -lane urban arterial Prelim. Engineering, Right-of-Way, Construction 6 Evorgroen Road 14 Evergreen Rd Reconstruct and widen to three lanes Preliminary Engineering 7 Barker Rd Reconstruct - Boone to Spokano River Roconstnrct to u four-tone curbed arterial with center turn tan°. Construction City of f ''ine Valley Department Of 'Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2006 Annual Construction Program From Donors in thousands 14 Barker Road Boone Spokane River Brit 00230 0.69 Printed: 512 &'2001 Envir Work C Fund Work Ut&6°s fad Stato Other City To Road 8 Prop i1 l en(mi) Typo 0 Slat Meth Fund Souroc Funds funds Funds Funds 4 8th Avenue Reconstruction 1 03 ® S CTPGSW 16 8th Avonuo Havana Shoot Pork Rood 0.00 Tschiney Road Hodges Road 00031 1.26 S 03 11C1 P CPT 1 03 P 32nd Avenue 161.11 Avenue 01170 1.00 1 03 UP C City 245 0 0 245 245 C STP(U) 1,575 0 0 1.575 1,575 C City 180 13 40 127 100 C STP(1.Ii 1,151 80 260 811 1,151 C City C AIP C City C AIP C Other Roaring Dato: Artol, e: Env. Assess. Cato 400 P.E. R.W. Const Total 0 0 1,820 1,820 93 300 938 1,331 100 40 60 0 100 160 240 0 400 200 300 0 500 253 0 0 253 253 1.115 0 0 1,115 1,115 26 0 0 26 26 0 0 1,394 1,]94 Project Nemo Road Ramos Program Func Work Swpc Item Class Status Primed: 52812004 Valley Couplet • Project 2 2893 S 01 2 3 14 Sprague Ave Unkcrsity Rd Evergreen Rd 04535 2.02 14 2nd Avcnuc Construct multilane facility with curbs and sidewalks. Remove isands on Sprague Avenue and restripo, Prelim. Engineering, Right•af -Way Barker Road - Spokane River to Euclid Avenuo 14 Barker Road Spokane River Reconstruct to a three•ane curbed arterial Prelim. Engineering, Rigttl•of•Way From 10 Flora Rdt3R290 Minor Intersection Improvements 18 Flora Rd SR290 Prelim Engtneering, Construction Street Improvements Projects Total_ ■ City of SV•Ka ie Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2006 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands Envu Work C Fund Work Utilities Fed Slate Other City To Road # Prof II Lcra(mi) Type 0 Stet Meth Fund Source Fends Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Cored Total Unlversity Rd Evergreen Rd 00001 2.02 Euclid Avenue SR290 Construct raised cure channelizafion on SR290 to climinato NOL & SBL movements 00230 01345 0.00 I 03 0.56 7 I 12 ❑ P C City C TPP C STP(U) 292 C C@y C Other Ste Nearing Date: Adoptiu __ Env. Assess_ Date Resolution No, 50 12 36 0 50 490 120 360 0 480 69 223 0 292 C City 18 10 8 0 18 C STP(U) 122 67 55 0 122 11 5,833 2,905 411 201 621 0 822 77 63 0 140 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 10 11 2 0 11 13 849 1,623 2,780 5,669 10,072 Project tarn Road Names Program Fume Work Scope Item Class Status Bridge Construction 11 Barker Road Bridgo 14 Barker Road Replaco bridge over the Spokane River. Prelim. Engineering. Right -01-Way 12 Sul9van Road Wost Bridge 1 03 i P 14 Sullivan Road Reconstruct and Nidcn Nest bridge Prelim_ Engineering, RigM•of•Way Bridge Cons1nxilon Projocfs Total: City of ,'one Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2006 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousand From ® Spokane River 85503 e Spokano River 04511.S 04597 0.22 Total Program for 2008 6,415 2,965 411 936 2,242 2,830 5,889 10,741 Printed: 512812004 8 I 09 GIP T 0.10 C BR C BR 47 167 Hearing Dato: Ado, Env. Assess. Cato Emir Work C Fund Work Utilities Fed State O her City To Road 8 Proj II Lenlmg Typo 0 Slat Meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. RW_ Cortst Total 44 3 0 47 175 12 0 187 219 15 0 234 C City 87 60 7 0 87 C 611 348 320 23 0 348 400 35 0 435 682 87 619 50 0 669 Project Namc Road Names Program rurrc Work Scope Item Class Status Street Improvements 1 Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) 06 Bigelow Gulch Road Forkcr Road R Progress Wellesley Road 03768 0,91 Rewwnstruct and widen the Sullivan Road extension north also known as Bigelow Gulch Road to a 4-lane roadway with 8-toot shoulders and a 12•foot two way left tum lane. Construction Bridging the Valley- Park Road' BNSF Grado Sop 1 03 tad S Indiana Avenue Montgomery Ave. 03714 0.20 14 Park Road Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of Per Road and the BNSF railroad tracks. Prelim. En•Ineering, Rightol -Way, Canstrucion 3 Bth Avenue Reconstnretion 16 Bth Avenue Havana Street Park Road 0.00 Reconstruct 80 Ave. to a three lane section with curb, meter, sidewalks and bike lanes. Construction City of Sporvcifie Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2007 Annual Construction Program Dalars in thousands From Printed: 5/28/2094 9 S 03 '2 P TGP Hearing Date: Adoptio�a__ Env. Assess. Date Resolution No, Envi Work C Fund Work Utaties Fcd State Other City To Road # Prof # Lon(mq Type 0 Scat Meth h Furrd Souroo Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Const Total 1 03 S CTPGSW C City 36 0 0 39 36 C County 0 0 365 366 C TPP 1,451 0 0 1,451 1,451 C STP(U) 565 0 0 565 565 C Other Fed 6,343 316 1,280 4.767 8,343 C Other Ste 352 17 70 265 352 C Other 352 17 70 2.65 352 C City C STP(UI 1,575 0 0 2,418 2,418 350 1,400 5,297 7,047 245 0 0 245 245 0 0 1,575 1,575 0 0 1,820 1,820 4 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Item Class Status Valley Couplet - Prefect 2 2883 S 0i 2 S 14 Sprague Ave Urthersity Rd Evergreen Rd 04538 2.02 14 2nd Avenue Unhcrsity Rd Evergreen Rd 00001 2.02 Construct multi -fano fac6ty with curbs and sidewalks. Remove islands an Sprague Avenue and restripo. Prelim. Engineering, Rigid-at-Way 5 Applcway Road S 03 P CPT 14 Appteway Road Tschirtey Road Hodges Road 00031 1,26 Reconstruct to a Ilve -lane urban arterial Con;.tnrdion 6 Barker Road - Spokane River to Euclid Avenue 1 03 11 P 14 Barker Road Spokane River Eucdd Avenue 00230 0.56 Reconstruct to a Duets-lano curbed arterial Right•of -Way 7 Evergreen Road 1 03 J P 14 Evergreen Rd Reconstruct and widen to Three lanes Right- of-way appraisals 8 aruislion City of Si lne Valley Department of Public Works 2005 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2007 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands Freon 32nd Avenue 1611 Avenue 01170 1.00 Printed: 5282004 10 Hearing Date: Arias Env. Assess. Date Env& Work C Ftcrd Work Utilities Fed State Other City To Road # Prot 8 1-€11 Type 0 Slat Meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R,W, Cons1 Total C City C TPP C STP(U) 292 C City C City C AIP 50 12 38 0 50 480 120 360 0 4.80 69 223 0 292 201 821 0 822 C City 22.'' 0 0 223 223 C STP(U) 1,427 • 0 0 1,427 1,427 0 0 1,650 1,650 C City 25 0 25 0 25 C STP(U) . 163 0 163 0 189 0 183 0 188 180 0 180 0 180 220 0 0 220 220 720 0 720 0 720 0 800 220 1,120 Pi ojed Ramo Road Nmnes Progrmn Pune Work Scope Item Class • Status From 8 Barker Road - 8th to Broadway Avenue 16 Barker Road 6th Avenue Broadway Avenue 00230 1.03 9 Reconstruct to a threedane urban arterial from 8th to Applcway. Rcoonslruct to a four - lane arterial with center turn lane from App away to Broadway Ave. Prelim Engineertng, Right -of -Way Flora Road 14 Flora Rd Reconstruct to a threeaane arterial Sheet Improvements Projects Total: City of Sp Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2007 Annual Construction Program Dollars In thousands Envl Work C Fund Work Matins Fed Stale Other City To Flood # Proj # Lea(lm) Typo 0 Slat Meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P -E. R.W. Coast Total Sprague Av Mission Av 01344 1.00 Printed: 5/2377004 11 1 02 S P COPT C Ctty C STP(U) 447 C City C TPP Hearing Date: Adoptia� _ 4 � Env. Assess, Date Reeolulion No. 70 23 47 0 70 144 303 0 447 167 350 0 517 27 27 0 0 27 173 173 0 0 173 200 0 0 200 10,812 3,176 352 1,078 918 3,459 11,405 15,782 Project Namo Road Names Program Func Work Scopo Item Class Status Bridge Construction 10 Barker Road Bridge 14 Barker Road Replace brick° over the Spokane River. Construction 11 Sullivan Road West Bridge 1 03 U P 14 Sullivan Road ej Spokane River #4511 -5 04597 0.22 Reconstruct and widen west bridge Construction Bridgo Construction Projocts Total: City of S: `ne Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2007 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands From ® Spokane River 05503 Prtntcd: 5428/2004 12 Hearing Dale: Adop. Env. Assess. Date Rosa . • DI`R Wank C Fund Work UtTrties Fed Stale Other City To Road II Prof 0 m Type O Sl meth Fund S ource Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Coast Total 1 O9 ❑ P T 0.10 C BR 730 0 0 730 730 C BR 2,919 0 0 2,919 2,919 C City C BR O 0 3,649 3,649 757 0 0 757 757 3,026 0 0 3,028 3,028 O 0 3,783 3,783 6,675 757 0 0 7,432 7,432 Total Program for 2007 17,487 3,176 352 1,833 918 3,459 18,837 23,214 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Item Ctass Status Street Improvements Printed: 512812004 Construct mutd -tune facility with curbs and sidewalks. Remove islands on Sprague Avenue and rostripe. • Construction 2 Sullivan Road North Extension (Bigelow Gulch) 08 Bigelow Gulch Road Porker Road 8 Progress Wellesley Road RcNConstruct and widen the Srdttan Road exleraian north also knomn as Bigelow Gulch Read to a 4-lano roadway with 8-laol shoulders and a 124001 two way lei turn lane. Construction 3 Evergreen Road 14 Evergreen Rd Reconstruct and widen to three lanes City of Shur`vie Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2008 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands Fran 1 Valloy Couplet - Protect 2 14 Sprague Avo Ualversty Rd Evergreen Rd 04538 2.02 14 2nd Avenue Univcrsty Rd Evergreen Rd 00001 2.02 Envlr Work C Fund Work Utilities Fcd State Other City To Road 0 Proj tt Len(ml) Type 0 Stet Meth Fund s oma Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Coast Total 32nd Avenue 16th Avenue 01170 1,00 2883 S 01 2 S S 03 ✓ P TGP 03788 0.91 1 03U✓ P 13 Hearing Date: Adoptir:_„ _ I Env. Assess. Date Resolution tdo. C City 493 0 0 993 993 C TPP 1,914 0 0 1,914 1,914 C STP(U) 850 0 0 850 850 C Other Sta 470 0 0 470 470 C Cry 18 0 0 18 18 C TPP 713 0 0 713 713 C County 0 0 180 180 C STP(U) 278 0 0 278 278 C AAP 880 0 0 4,227 4,227 0 0 1,189 1,189 0 0 880 880 0 0 690 880 Project Name Road Ramos Program Func Work Scopo Item Class Status 4 Barker Road - Bth to Broadway Avenue 1 02 P CGPT 16 Barker Road 6th Avenue Broadway Avenue 00230 1.03 Reconstruct to a three•lane urban arterial from 8th to Appleway. Reconstruct to a tour - lane arterial with center turn lane from Appfeway to Broadway Ave. Right -of-Way 5 Barker Road • Spokane River to Euclid Avenue 1 03 U P 14 Barker Road Spokane River Euclid Avenue 00230 0.56 Reconstruct to a Uuee•lane curbed arterial Construction B Valley Couplet - Project 3 7 From 14 Valley Couplet Evergreen Road Constnrd mufti-lane faclty Wet) curbs and sidewalks. Remove islands on Sprague Avenue and restripe. Rigt 1of•Way City of S ine Valley Department of Public Works 2005 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2008 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands 2797 S 01 J S CGPTW Sullivan Road 08000 1.02 Flora Road 1 03 (r] P 14 Flora Rd Sprague Av Mission Av 01344 1,00 Reconstruct to a three -ano arterial. Printed: 512812004 14 Heating 0ate: /dap Env. Assess Date Envir Work C Fund Mirk Utilities Fed State Other City Road # Prty # Len(mf) Type 0 Stet Meth Fund Sources Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Cons! Total C City 142 0 142 0 142 C STP(U) 903 0 908 0 908 0 1,050 0 1,050 C City 129 0 0 129 129 C STP(U) 830 0 0 830 830 0 0 959 959 C City 80 30 50 0 80 C STP(U) 194 194 0 0 194 224 50 0 274 C City 108 0 108 0 108 C TPP 692 0 692 0 692 0 800 0 600 Project Name Road Names Program Fyne Work Scope Item Class Status 5 Bridging the Valley- Pork Road/ BNSF Grade Sep 14 Park Road Indiana Avenue Montgomery Ave, 03714 0.20 Printed: 512512004 From Reconslrucl Park Road to separate the grades of Park Road and the Rl4SF retread tracks. Construction 14 Bovdsh Road Reconstruct and widen roadway to three tones. Preliminary Engineering Street Improvements Pro)ec1s Total: City of Sr '',:Zle Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2008 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands Hearing Date: Arfopto'„ Emr. Assess. Date Resolution lib_ F-rrfr Work C Fund Work Utilities Fed State Other City To Road 6 Praj TYpe 0 Slat Meth Fund SouzCr Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Const Total 32nd Avenue 6111 Avenue 00207 1,52 1 03 PI S 9 Sawfish Road 1 03 U P CGPTW 15 C Other Fed 4.766 0 0 4,765 4,766 C Other Stn 255 0 0 265 26S C Other 265 0 0 265 265 C City C RIP 7,825 5,451 0 0 5,296 5,265 132 32 103 0 132 527 127 403 0 527 265 1,002 159 500 0 659 383 2,400 12,551 15,334 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Item Class Status Bridge Construction 10 Sullivan Road West Bridge 1 03 P 14 Sullivan Road @ Spokane River #4511-6 04597 0.22 Reconstruct and widen Nest bridge 11 Barker Road Bridge 14 Barker Road Replace bridge over the Spokane River, Constnrdion Bridgo Coritruction Projects Total: City of Ane Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2008 Annual Construction Program Dollars In thousands From Spokane Rivor #5503 Painted: 5i2812094 16 Nearing Date: Ado. / .e_ Env. Assess. Dale Emir Work C Fund Work Uhlties Fed State Other City To Road 0 Prof p Lan(m) Type 0 Stat Moth Fund Souroo Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Con.t Total 1 09 UP T 0.10 C City 757 0 0 757 757 C BR 3,026 0 0 3,026 3,028 0 0 3,783 3,783 C BFt 2,019 0 0 2,919 2,919 C RR 730 0 0 730 730 0 0 3,649 3,649 6,675 757 0 0 7,432 7,432 Total Program for 2008 14,501 6,461 265 2,359 363 2,400 19,963 22,766 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Liam Class Status Street Improvements 1 Valley Couplet- Project 4 14 Valley Couplet Sull an Road Applcway Road 05000 1.19 2 Printed: 5/28/2004 Construct tour lanes with curbs and sidewaDcs. Remove islands on Sprague Avenue and restripe. Preliminary Engineering Valley Couplet • Project 2 14 Sprague Ave 14 2nd Avenue Construct multi -lane fadlity with curbs and sidewalks. Remove Islands on Sprague Avenue and castrpe. Construction Park Road 1 03 14 Perk Rd Reconstruct and widen to five lanes Prelim, Engineering, Righlwi•Wey City of Sp ?icie Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2009 Annual Construction Program From 2983 S 01 R S University Rd Evergreen Rd 04538 2.02 University Rd Evergreen Rd 00001 2.02 Broadway Av Emir Work C Fund Work Utilities Fed State Other City To Road tt Prole d LerNnN) Typo 0 Stet Meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds Indiana Av Construct rnufti.8ine taa'@y w0;h curbs and sidewalks. Remove islands on Sprague Avenue and restripe. Complete constriction Dollars in thousands 03714 5 01 R P CGPTW 0.75 4 Valley Couplet - Project 3 14 Valley Couplet Evergreen Road Su15ran Road 09000 1.02 17 C City C STP(1I) 350 C City C TPP C S1P(U) 557 C City C AIP 2797 3 01 r161 S CGPTW Hearing Date: Adoptic Env. Assess. Date Resolution No. P,E R.W. Const Total 54 37 17 0 54 242 103 0 350 279 125 0 404 602 0 0 602 802 1,336 0 0 1,336 1,338 O 0 557 567 O 0 2.505 2,505 73 28 45 0 79 292 112 180 0 292 140 225 0 385 C City 148 0 61 87 148 C STP{U) 947 0 390 557 947 O 451 644 1,095 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope Envlr Work C Fund Work Ottlilles Feed State Other City Item Class Status From To Road 4 Proj 4 Len(ml) Type 0 Start Meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Canal Total 5 Flora Road 1 03 P 14 F1nra Rd Sprague Av Mission Av 01344 1.00 Reconstruct to a thrco4une arterial. 6 Euclid Rd/ Flora Rd I 03 ,VJ p 17 Euclid Av Flora Road Barker Road 01166 0.97 18 Fiore Rd Euclid Road Eucld Road 01343 0,14 Reconstruct to provido a two Line, shouldered arterial Prelim. Enginocring 7 32nd Avenue 14 32nd Avenuo Roconstruct and widen to three lanes with curbs and sidewalks. Prelim. Engineering, Righ1•ot•Way 8 Bowdish Road 14 Bowdish Road Reconstruct and widen roadway to three lanes. Rlghlof -Way City of SI ; ine Valley Department or�tublic Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2009 Annual Construction Program Whirs inthousands I 03 J P COML./ SR 27 Best Road 05971 0.48 1 03 U P CGPTW 32nd Avenue 8th Avenue 00297 1.52 Printod; 528/2004 18 C City C City C AIP Roaring Dale: Adop Env. Assess. Date C City 203 0 0 203 203 C TPP 1,297 0 0 1,297 1,297 838 0 0 1.500 1,500 50 50 0 0 50 50 0 0 50 C City 29 9 20 0 29 C STP(U) 184 57 127 0 184 ' GO 147 0 213 210 0 100 110 210 0 400 438 838 0 500 548 1,048 Protect Name Road Karnes Program Furze Wort Scope tlem Class Status Reconstruct to a three-lane urban oriels! from &h to Applewey. Reconstruct 10 a fovr- tane arterial with center tum lane from Appleway to Broau ay Ave. Construction Street Improvements Projects Total Total Program for 2009 City of SF , :..rye Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2009 Annual Construction Program Dollars in thousands • From 9 Barker Rood - 8th to 8roodway Avenue 1 02 0 P CQP1' 10 Barkcr Road 8th Avenuo Broadway Avenue 00230 1.03 Printed: 5728!2004 19 Hearing Dale.: fvfop10.... . Env. Assess. Outs Resolution No. Enuir Work C Fund Work Utilities Fed State Other Cty To Road 11 Prof 0 Len(mi) Typo p Stat Meih Fund S ource Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. RAN, Canst Total C City 271 0 0 271 271 C STP(U) 1,732 0 0 1.732 1,732 0 0 2,003 2,003 3,780 3,763 1,640 535 1,448 7,200 9,183 3,780 3,783 1,640 535 1,448 7,200 0,183 Project Name Road Names Program Func Work Scope ttem Class Status Street Improvements 1 Valley Couplet- Project 4 Construct four panes with curbs and sidewalks. Remove islands on Sprague Avenue and rostipo, 149M -of -way 2 Valley Couplet - Project 3 14 Vafoy Couplet Consbucl mutt) -4ane facility with curbs and sidewalks. Remove islands on Spraguo Avenue and restripe. Canstuction 3 Sullivan Road Reconstruct to a seven -lane urban arterial. Widen bridges at Spokane Rivet, UPRR, BNAR, and SR 290 Prelim. Engrroering 4 Ferret Avenue 14 Valley Couplet Sullivan Road Appleway Road 09000 1.19 17 FerretAvenuo City of 'ane Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2010 Annual Construction Program Dollars 51 thousands From Erwrr Work C Fund Work Utilities Fed Steto Olher City To Road o Proj 0 Lon(m) Typo 0 Slat Math Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Const Total Evergroon Road Suifman Road 06000 1.02 14 Sulivan Road Euc5d Avarua Wellesley Avenue 04597 1.00 Ponderosa Drive Dishman Mica Road 0.0D Construct a two -lano csnbod arterial wi1A an at-grade Railroad crossing at the UPRR. Printed: 52812004 20 S 01 0 P CGPTW 2797 S 01 LI✓ S CGP1W I 03 i✓I P O1 LI PT Mooring Oath: Env, Assess. Date Ado' ;10: C CSy 51 0 51 0 51 C STP(U) 324 0 324 0 324 O 375 0 375 C City 261 0 0 261 261 C STP(U) 1,671 0 0 1,871 1,871 C Ciy C City O 0 1,932 1,932 93 93 0 0 93 93 0 0 93 710 60 100 550 710 60 100 550 710 Project Rame Road Names Program Fur= Work Scope (tern Class Status From To Road 5 Proj # Len(mi) Typo (3 Scat meth Fund Source Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. R.W. Coast Total 5 Euclid Rd/ Flora Rd 1 03 2 P 17 Euclid Av Flora Road Barker Road 01166 0.97 16 Fora Rd Euclid Road Euclid Road 01345 0.14 6 Reconstruct to provide a two lane, shouldered arterial Construction Park Road 14 Pads Rd Broadway Av Indana Av 03714 0.75 Reconstruct and widen to five Lanes Right-al-Way, Construction 7 8owdish Road 14 Bowdish Road Reconslrucl and widen roadway to thrco Janos. Construction 8 32nd Avenue 14 32ndAvonuo Primed: 5128/2004 Reconstruct and widen to three lanes w curbs and sidewalks. Rigtll o1•Way, Constmcion City of S(:runa ie Valley Department of Public Works 2005 - 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2010 Annual Construction Program Dollars In thousands 1 03 A P SR 27 Best Road 05971 0.48 Gnvir Work C Fund Wick Utilities Fed Stalo Other City I 03 P CGPTW 32nd Avenue 8th Avenue 00297 1.52 21 C City C City C AIP C City C AIP 1 03 4 P CGPTW C City C STP(lI) 512 Hearing Date: Adoplir Env. Assess, Onto Resolution No, 550 0 0 550 550 O 0 550 550 178 0 105 73 178 712 0 420 292 712 O 525 36 890 256 0 0 256 256 1,021 0 0 1.021 1,021 O 0 1,277 1,277 80 0 20 60 80 O 127 355 512 O 147 445 592 Project Warne Road Names Program Func Work Scope Rom Class Status Street Improvements Projocb Total: Total Program for 2010 City of Sk l.ne Valley Department of " "r`ublic Works 2005 2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2010 Annual Construction Program Acura in thousands From Printed: 5262004 22 Hearing Dale: Adopt. Env. Assess. Data Resole__ Envir Work C Fund Woric Utilities Fed State Other City To Road 0 Rol 0 Lenin* Typo o Slat Meth Fund Saute Funds Funds Funds Funds P.E. RW. Const Total 2,507 1,733 2,179 153 1,147 5,119 6,419 2,507 1,733 2,179 153 1,147 5,119 8,419 I-Nne.ihtussIlektj Iprejec4 'Quo km flood Him In euck1: r L •1.(4.% . j :S\11' .1 id Itti; 11— _ 11,10 I 5 1 I Ise 9 Cr ThavidS11 ' 2005 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SIX YEAR 2005 - 201 Feet t _I_ Miltey UG '(fl CC 79 IIMMT DRAFT Mayor DeVleming called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Diana Wilhite, Deputy Mayor Dick Denenny, Councilmember Mike Flanigan, Councilmember Richard Munson, Councilmember Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Steve Taylor, Councilmember MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, June 8, 2004 Staff: Dave Mercier, City Manager Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Stanley Schwartz, City Attorney Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Neil Kcrsten, Public Works Director Marina Sukup, Community Development Director Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director Greg McCormick, Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, Long Range Planner Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Sue Pearson, Deputy City Clerk Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor DeVleming led the Pledge of Allegiance. i1NVOCATiON: Pastor Gary Hebden, Valley Open Bible Church ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Mayor DeVleming said that there will be two added agenda items: #2a will be a resolution regarding Felts Field Airport Zoning; and item #5a will be a discussion on June 11 as a national day of mourning. It was moved by Councilmember Denenny and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to approve the agenda as Amended. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: ll gone. Motion carried. COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY' REPORTS: Councilmember Munson: reported that he serves on a committee putting together rules for a public advisory committee. for the Spokane Transit Authority. Councilmember Schi »nnels: stated that he met with the Solid Waste Liaison Committee which is working with an engineering firm in Spokane concerning a possible conflict with the Comp Plan Agreement; that a vote was taken resulting in a tie so the matter will be forwarded to the Spokane City Council and Spokane Board of County Commissioners. Councilmember Flanigan: stated that Ile observed a Tourism Promotion Area Commission meeting, that they are examining combining this year and next year's revenues for an estimated 1.9 million and will have approximately $100,000 in reserves; that 1.75 million is planned to be recommended to be used by the Regional Sports and the Convention Visitor's Bureau leaving $50,000 for other entities requesting funds. Councilmember Flanigan also stated he attended the grand opening of the Skate Park last week, along with 400 — 500 other community members. Council Minutes 06.08 -04 Pane I of 5 Datc Approved by Council: DRAFT Deputy Mayor Wilhite: announced she attended an EDC meeting where they went over the consultant's survey which was the information presented last week; and that she also attended the Skate Park Grand Opening. MAYOR'S REPORT: None PUBLIC COMMENTS: None 1. CONSENT AGENDA: After City Clerk Bainbridge read the Consent Agenda, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Munson to approve the Consent Agenda. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS 2. Proposed Resolution #04 -016 Authorizing Inclusion of Spokane Valley Within an Aquifer Protection Area — Neil Kersten After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Munson to approve Resolution 04 -016. Public Works Director Kersten gave an overview of the re- authorization of the aquifer protection area program, and suggested adding the following verbiage to the last paragraph: "NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED that ... within the boundaries of the reauthorized Spokane Aquifer Protection Area, subject to approval by Spokane Valley and Spokane County of an interlocal agreement regarding use of the funds..." Mayor DeVleming accepted the revised language in the resolution, seconder agreed. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote on the following amended motion: To approve Resolution 04- 016 with the revised included language: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 2a. Resolution 04 017 Adopting Section 8(f) and of the Amended Spokane Coun. ,City Airport Agreement as the land use and zoning plan for development of Felts Field Airport. After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Taylor to approve Resolution 04 -017. Councilmember Denenny stated he has a hanger at Felts Field and therefore recused himself from this issue and left the dais. Councilmember Munson stated that this is the first time he has seen this and suggested this issue be tabled until the next meeting to give him a chance to read the material. Attorney Schwartz explained that this is a time- sensitive matter as the airport is in the process of developing new and additional hangers at the field, that they would like construction activity to commence before July 1 before the new Code takes affect. Attorney Schwartz continued by explaining that this resolution is intended to address the proper zoning for Felts Field, and once that is accomplished, a building permit process will be initiated. Attorney Schwartz then explained the recitals of the resolution and added that the Felts Field Airport MasterPlan provides for expansion, and that a copy of that Plan will be available at the City Clerk's office. Councilmember Munson stated that although the proposal appears straight - forward, he has a basic principle not to vote on issues without studying the information. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment: Jerry Neal, general counsel to Spokane Airports thanked Council on behalf of the Spokane Airports, and said he is available should council have questions. Mayor DeVleming invited further public comment; no further comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor DeVleming, Deputy Mayor Wilhite, Councilmernbers Schimmels, Taylor, and Flanigan. Opposed: Councihnetnber Munson. Abstentions: Councilmember Denenny. Motion carried. Councilmember Denenny returned to the dais. 3. Motion Consideration: Approval of Opportunity Cemetery Association Easement — Cary Driskell It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councibnember Taylor to approve the Cemetery Easement. Deputy Attorney Driskell explained the background as presented on his Request for Council Action form, and added that we are still waiting for the legal description, and once received, that will be Council Minutes 06-08-04 Page 2 of 5 Date Approved by Council: DRAFT added to the easement. Mayor DeVleming invited public; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried 4. Motion Consideration: Approval to Advance 2005 -2010 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program to Public 1-learina for Adoption Consideration at Council's June 22 Meeting — Neil KerstenfSteve Worley It was moved by Mayor DeV7eming and seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilhite to advance 2005 -2010 Six - Year Transportation Improvement Program to .Public Hearing for Adoption Consideration at Council's June 22 Meeting. As shown on the Request for Council Action Form, Engineer Worley went through the changes in the plan adopted last year for 2004 -2009, and spoke concerning the additional projects. After brief council discussion concerning the proposed changes, Mayor DeVleming invited public comment. Bill Gothmann, 10010 East 47 Avenue and Chair of the Planning Commission, stated his concern with the amount of traffic on S and another concern for school children crossing from the north side of 8 to the south side. There being no further comments, Mayor DeVleming called for the vote by acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 5. Motion consideration, Mayor Appointments to Salary Commission — Mayor DeVleming It was moved by Mayor Devleming, and seconded by Councilmember Munson to approve the following citizens to the salary Commission: Diane Brown, Frankie DeWitt, Michele Eickernran, Dave Gregory, Rod Grondel, and Jim Huttenmeier as alternate if someone cannot accept the position. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by acclamation: in Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 5a. Discussion 011 Designating June 11 as a National Day of Mourning. It was moved by Councilmember Munson and seconded by Councilmember Taylor that the City Council authorize that this City also close offices in recognition of the national day of mourning for President Reagan. After brief discussion, Mayor DeVleming called for the vote by acclamation: In Favor: Mayor DeVleming, Councilmembers Schimmels, Taylor, Munson, Flanigan and Denenny. Opposed: Deputy Mayor Wilhite. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT: Mayor DeVleming invited public comment. Howard Bruegeman, 18422 E. Sharp, Grcenacres: stated his objection to zoning of property at: the northwest corner of Boone and Barker; said there was mention of a 30 -unit apartment going in there which he feels is unacceptable; and that he will further comment on this at the June 22 meeting. Mr. Bruegeman handed a petition to the City Clerk of those neighbors against the proposed zoning. Minnie Overstreet, E 18511 Sharp: stated she lives across from where they want to put in the apartment and she opposes the proposal. JoAnn Carlson, 18519 E. Sharp: said she has lived on that property for 44 years, and if an apartment goes in with many units, she won't be able to get past the light across Broadway and Barker as the traffic will be highly congested; she is against the proposal and will speak more at the next meeting. Mayor DeVleming invited further public comments; no further comments were given. Mayor DeVleming called for a brief recess at 7:20 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:30 p.m. 6. Plan Review Fee Structure — Marina Suku Community Development Director Sukup went over the permit fee schedule on page six: Plan Review Fee; and explained those fees and percentages. Discussion ensued regarding typical plan reviews, average hours for staff, cost recovery, fixed costs, enough history upon which to base any figure, larger fees for unusually complex plans, and dollar amount caps versus percentages, or some combination. Council Minutes 06 -08 -04 Page 3 of 5 Date Approved by Council: DRAFT Mayor DeVleming suggested staff pursue implications of a cap, perhaps $25,000 or $35,000 on plan review fees and if that would allow cost recovery excluding something extraordinary and complex. City Manager Mercier suggested coming back to Council with a formula or capping proposal in extreme situations. Deputy Mayor Wilhite said she would like to see research on fee percentages and caps and what the differences would entail, keeping in mind we want to remain business- friendly. City Manager Mercier added that as part of the budget, staff will bring back a series of recommendations regarding what fees might be altered. Mayor DeVleming stated he would like staff to work toward a modified percentage and capping issues to give options. 7. Discussion Points on Potential Amendments to Criminal Code — Cary Driskell Deputy City Attorney Driskell said that there are several agencies involved with carrying out our criminal justice contracts and they have brought forward suggested changes to the Criminal Code. Attorney Driskell then explained the issues presented in his attached June 8 memorandum. Council discussion focused on loud music, car music, and noise complaints in general. Attorney Driskell stated he will conduct further research on jake brakes, if there are any car - stereo music hobbyists, and commented further on the "reasonable person" standard for violation and the use of decimeters. 8. CenterPlace Project Status — Mike Jackson Parks and Recreation Director Jackson, with the assistance of Engineer Worley, gave a presentation on the construction update, followed by a report on the potential floor plan change for the Senior Center Wing, and an update on discussions with the college. Engineer Worley reported that the contractor is doing well, the site is completely rough graded, drain drywalls are installed, the basement walls are complete, and the floor slab has been poured. Concerning the Senior Center, Director Jackson said he has had ongoing discussions concerning the senior's desire for a wood floor in that section dedicated to the seniors. Councilmember Munson said he has no problem with that provided the senior association is willing to pay the expenses; Councilmember Taylor said he would be in favor of adding a wood floor but not in favor of the City paying the entire cost. Director Jackson said the change would result in an estimated additional $10,000. After discussion concerning removal of the wall in that area, tile versus wood floor, modular floors, and the conference room in that area, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Schimmels, to proceed with the wood floor on a 75%/25% fee allocation, with the association paying the 75 %. City Manager Mercier stated that the construction continues and direction needs to be given on moving forward, and that perhaps consideration could be given to grant staff the latitude to move forward provided the city does not bear the majority of the expense. it was then moved by Deputy Mayor Wilhite and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to amend the motion to add granting staff direction to move forward with the project, where the City would not be responsible for the major portion of it. After further discussion on the cost allocation, Councilmember Munson called for the question. Vote by acclamation on the amended motion: In Favor: Mayor DeVleming, Deputy Mayor Wilhite, Councilmembers Schimmels, Munson, Flanigan, and Denenny. Opposed: Councilmember Taylor. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. City Manager Mercier reiterated that staff will pursue the 75%/25% mix, that staff may need to give direction to the contractor and architect before all meetings and figures are resolved, and if the Association counter -offers there may be some costs we could not recover, and that it is clearly understood that the proposal will be brought to the association with the 75 %125% mix. Concerning the discussions with the College, Director Jackson said that concerning the space they propose to possibly put in a wet lab, that if that is done the cost is a concern with there will be additions of running water, drains, exhaust hoods and motors, etc, and would cost an estimated $25,000; that the College proposes to rough -in those fixtures; and that staff recommends the college be responsible for that additional cost, that the College appears agreeable and staff is waiting for the final response. 9. Comprehensive Plan Amendments Reconsideration of Ordinances Remanded by the GM.A Hearing Board — GreR McCormick/Scott. K.uhta Long Range Planning Manager McCormick went over the history of the remanded ordinances, and briefly explained each File No. Prior to explanation, Councilmember Schimmels removed himself from the dais Council Minutes 06 -08-04 Page 4 of 5 Date Approved by Council: DRAFT so as to avoid any appearance of conflict of interest: on specifically File No. CPA- 03 -02. After Manager McConiiick's explanation of the files, his PowerPoint presentation on each, and brief discussion concerning the possible neighborhood issues associated with CPA 03 -07, Councilmember Schimmels returned to the dais, and City Manager Mercier said that when the ordinances are presented at the June 22 meeting, CPA -03 -02 will be presented first, followed by CPA 03 -01, then the next five, with the potentially controversial CPA -03 -07 being presented last. As there was no further business, it was moved by Councilmember Flanigan, seconded, and unanimously agreed upon to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:47 p.m. ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Michael DeVleming, Mayor Council Minutes 06 -08-04 Page 5 of 5 Date Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 6 -22 -04 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Claims: Voucher listing total for June 10, 2004 OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for 06/10/04 in the amount of 6350,443.83 BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: Mary Baslington ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists Voucher Bank code : apbank Date Vendor Invoice 4883 6/2/2004 000420 SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DIST pool rep 4887 6/10/2004 000170 1ST LINE 1ST AID INC 8665 8678 4888 6/10/2004 000135 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATIOI` 06/04/04 4889 6/10/2004 000221 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC_ 06/04/04 4890 6/10/2004 000168 B & C TELEPHONE INC. 4893 6/10/2004 000035 CORPORATE EXPRESS 51419112 51525291 52291776 52324573 4894 6/10/2004 000059 DEVLEMING, MICHAEL 06/04/04 / r 1 vchlist Voucher List 06/10/2004 11:17:06AM Spokane Valley 4891 6/10/2004 000514 CHEMICAL TESTING MOBILE SERVI( 24063 4892 6/10/2004 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 870166725405 4895 6/10/2004 000007 GRAINGER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 696 - 779494 -9 800 - 784380 -1 PO # 40154 40155 40117 40117 Description /Account PERMIT TO OPERATE POOL Total : TRAINING FIRST AID TRAINING MEMBERSHIPS MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL VEHICLE FUEL OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES Total : Total : Total : 80099 TELEPHONE SYSTEM REPAIR & 80123 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT - F Total : EMPLOYMENT SCREENING EXA Total : Total : Total : PARKING & MILEAGE REIMBURS Total : SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT WHITE MARKING PAINT - STREE Total : Page: 1 Amount 525.00 525.00 90.00 60.00 150.00 45.00 45.00 118,00 118.00 178.37 520.26 698.63 14.00 14.00 682.67 682.67 9.39 143.67 21.24 3.81 178.11 86.69 86.69 377.27 30.62 407.89 4896 6/10/2004 000408 GRIFFIN PUBLISHING INC 04365 40097 MONTHLY NEWSLETTER PRINT! 339.43 Page: 1 vchlist 06/10/2004 11:17:06AM Bank code : apbank VGuiiier List Page: 2 Spokane Valley Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 4896 6/10/2004 000408 GRIFFIN PUBLISHING INC (Continued) A4365 ADDITIONAL POSTAGE FOR MOI 19.20 Total : 358.63 4897 6/10/2004 000002 H & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS 081942 SERVICE LABOR ON FRONT FA) 75.00 093459 OFFICE SUPPLIES - PAPER FOR 123.71 120623 COPIES 44.48 Total : 243.19 4898 6/10/2004 000441 HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL CREDI 3100218 & 29997 SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 184.86 Total : 184.86 4899 6/10/2004 000259 HUMANIX 138784 TEMPORARY LABOR SERVICES 109.28 Total : 109.28 4900 6/10/2004 000137 HUPPIN'S HI -FI, PHOTO & VIDEO S1267555 6/4/04 40143 DIGITAL CAMERA 649.14 Total : 649.14 4901 6/10/2004 000222 ICMA RETIREMENT CORP. 020795 ICMA QUARTERLY EMPLOYER P 125.00 Total : 125.00 4902 6/10/2004 000265 JACKSON, MIKE 06/04/04 REIMBURSEMENT FOR OFFICE ; 7.18 Total : 7.18 4903 6/10/2004 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBLISHING 24480 -24537 PUBLIC NOTICES - LEGAL PUBLI 363.75 Total : 363.75 4904 6/10/2004 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 06/04/04 40162 SUBSCRIPTIONS 37.84 Total : 37.84 4905 6/10/2004 000010 KINKO'S INC. 289700054213 40163 PUBLICATION COPIES 116.24 Total : 116.24 4906 6/10/2004 000033 MCPC 4549522 OFFICE SUPPLIES 48.30 Total : 48.30 4907 6/10/2004 000484 MOONEY & PUGH CONTRACTORS If may billing 40176 PROJECT BILLING FOR MAY - CE 333,187.00 Page: 2 vchlist 06/10/2004 11:17:06AM Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor 4909 6/10/2004 000036 OFFICE DEPOT CREDIT PLAN 4914 6/10/2004 000415 ROSAUERS U -CITY 4915 6/10/2004 000064 SCHIMMELS, GARY Invoice , . Voucher List Spokane Valley 4907 6/10/2004 000484 000484 MOONEY & PUGH CONTRACTOf (Continued) 4908 6/10/2004 000062 MUNSON, RICHARD 06/04/04 245117510 245117544 245124167 245795310 245795357 245795358 246267217 4910 6/10/2004 000512 OFFICETEAM 11216555 4911 6/10/2004 000016 PETROCARD SYSTEMS C429457 4912 6/10/2004 000494 PRO PEOPLE STAFFING SERVICES IN- 154971 IN- 155163 4913 6/10/2004 000515 PROLAND, LLC 1243 545573 553246 554786 06/04/04 PO # 40141 40168 40151 40168 40168 Description /Account TRANSPORTATION REIMBURSE Total : OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES VEHICLE FUEL Total : Total : TEMPORARY LABOR SERVICES Total : Total : TEMPORARY LABOR SERVICES TEMPORARY STAFFING SERVIC Total : FIBER PROJECT MEETING SUPPLIES MEETING SUPPLIES MEETING SUPPLIES Total : Total : TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT Total : 4916 6/10/2004 000297 SCHOLTENS, TOM 06/04/04 TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT FOR Page: 3 Amount 333,187.00 102.00 102.00 81.04 137.17 14.22 70.54 54.24 214.72 65.12 686.77 230.18 230.18 39.69 39.69 562.40 562.40 1,124.80 574.63 574.63 37.78 2.18 53.27 93.23 106.88 106.88 23.55 Page: 3 vchlist 06/10/2004 11:17:06AM Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor 4916 6/10/2004 000297 000297 SCHOLTENS, TOM 4917 6/10/2004 000324 SCWD #3 4921 6/10/2004 000509 SPOKANE PUBLIC SCHOOLS 4918 6/10/2004 000510 SPOKANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE 06/04/04 4919 6/10/2004 000511 SPOKANE COUNTY AUDITOR, VEHIC 06/04/04 4920 6/10/2004 000172 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 04 -22 4922 6/10/2004 000328 SPOKANE VALLEY SENIOR, CITIZEN 06/04 /04 4923 6/10/2004 000311 SPRINT PCS 4924 6/10/2004 000063 TAYLOR, STEVE 4925 6/10/2004 000500 TOSHIBA 4926 6/10/2004 000513 TYKO MECHANICAL, L.L.C. 4927 6/10/2004 000025 UNISOURCE CORPORATION Invoice 4928 6/10/2004 000125 WASH MUNICIPAL CLERKS ASSOC 06/04/04 4929 6/10/2004 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE May04 Voucher List Spokane Valley (Continued) 06/04/04 170 0040 - 03 PO #1 40170 723 40171 ROOM RENTAL FEE FOR COMP Total : 0141276664 -3 6-4 -04 06/04/04 1799870 06/04/04 657 21190710 40173 40152 Description /Account WATER TRAINING LICENSE RENEWAL 531 RJZ Total : ENGINEERING SERVICES NEWSLETTER POSTAGE REIMB Total : CELL PHONE CHARGES MEALS & MILEAGE REIMBURSE, Total : TOSHIBA PRODUCTS CENTERPLACE PLAN DEPOSIT F Total : PAPER TRASH DISPOSAL SERVICE Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : Total : 40172 WMCA MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR Total : Page: 4 Amount 23.55 68.16 68.16 110.00 110.00 33.75 33.75 3,198.74 3,198.74 158.75 158.75 643.79 643.79 728.46 728.46 40.00 40.00 2,724.95 2,724.95 150.00 150.00 227.98 227.98 100.00 100.00 941.12 Page: 4 vchlist 06/10/2004 11:17:06AM Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description /Account Amount 4929 6/10/2004 000038 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOP (Continued) Total : 44 Vouchers for bank code : apbank 44 Vouchers in this report I, the undersigned, do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished, the services rendered, or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just, due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify to said claim. Finance Director Date J Vouch r List Page: 5 Spokane Valley Bank total : Total vouchers : 941.12 350,443.83 350,443.83 Page: 5 Meeting Date: 6- 22 - -04 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Payroll for Period Ending June 15, 2004 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Payroll for period ending 06- 15 -04: Salary: $ 97,738.12 Benefits: $ 10,280.11 $108,018.23 STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cenis ATTACHMENTS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business © new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report (0 pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: PRESENTATION — Street Vacation Request STV -01 -04 for a portion of 15 Street west of Bettman Road. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 04 -001 (Street Vacations) in January 2004. Council was briefed on the proposed vacation on June 8, 2004. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on STV -01 -04 on May 13, 2004. At the close of the public hearing the Commission recommended to the City Council conditional approval of the original street vacation request and also recommended based on staff recommendation the vacation of additional abutting 15' Avenue public right -of -way to the immediate west. The original street vacation request was originally submitted to Spokane County in December 2002, prior to the City's incorporation, and was transferred by Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley at time of incorporation on March 31, 2003. The request was placed on hold pending the City's development of street vacation policies and procedures. The original request was made by Kurt and Mandee Vigessa, 1420 South Bettman Road (Parcel No. 35243.1041) and Gene and Lana Balch, 1506 South Bettman Road (Parcel No. 35243.1014). The Vigessa parcel abuts the 15 Avenue public right -of -way on the north and the Balch parcel abuts it on the south. The portion of 15 Avenue requested by Vigessa and Balch for vacation measures approximately 60 feet wide by 192.5 long for a total approximate area of 11,550 square feet. At the May 13 public hearing, staff presented a modified recommendation for the remaining portion of 15 Avenue immediately west and abutting the original street vacation request. This portion of 15 Avenue abuts Parcel No. 35243.1048 that is also owned by Kurt and Mandee Vigessa on the north and on the south Parcel No. 35243.1027 that is owned by CC Weyrauch and JH Tucker, 5908 East 15 Avenue. This portion of 15 Avenue measures approximately 50 feet wide by 60 feet long for a total approximate area of 3,000 square feet. The total approximate area of 15 Avenue proposed for street vacation is 14,550 square feet. RECOMMENDATION: Advance ordinance for STV -01 -04 to second reading. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF 15 AVENUE WIST OF I3ETTMAN ROAD AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council through Resolution initiated the vacation of 15 Avenue West of Bettman Road by providing that a hearing on the proposal to vacate the above street would be held before the Planning Commission on the 13th day of May, 2004 for the purpose of considering whether the vacation is in the public interest; WHEREAS, following a hearing before the Planning Commission, it has been found and determined that the vacation of the above referenced street complies with City Ordinance 04- 002, Section 11(SVMC Chapter 10.05) and includes one or more of the following findings: (1) The change of use or vacation will serve the public interest; (2) The Street or Alley is no longer required for public use or access; or (3) An alternative public way or private access would be more useful to the public and adjoining land owners; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and/or minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; WHEREAS, fifty percent of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated did not file a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; WHEREAS, through ordinance the City shall provide that the vacated property be transferred to the abutting property owners, one -half to each, unless circumstances require a different division of property, that the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street shall attach to the vacated property; that a record of survey shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development and that all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property; WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to RCW Chapter 35.79 and City Ordinance No. 04 -002 (SVMC Chapter 10.05) desires to vacate the above street as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findines of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: (1) the City Department of Public Works has reviewed the right -of -way to be vacated and determined that the property adjacent to the vacated property is otherwise served by public or private access; (2) a public hearing on the proposed vacation has been held in accordance with P:\Chy Council Agenda Packets\062204- R\Street vacation Ordinance 1 Sth st.doc State Law and City Ordinance before the Planning Commission with the record of such hearing and proceedings lodged with the City Clerk; (3) a written protest has not been filed with the City Clerk by at least fifty percent of the abutting property owners; and (4) vacation of the street or alley serves the public interest. Section 2. 12_LopeM to be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accordance with this ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley described on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. Zoning. The Zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make this notation on the official zoning map of the City. Section 4. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by thc City. 1. A record of survey shall be submitted to the City in accordance with City Ordinance 04 -002, Section 16 (SVMC Chapter 10.05). 2. Fees and Costs associated with the transfer of title to the vacated property shall be paid by the recipient (or grantee) of such property. The fees and costs include all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street. 3. Unless otherwise agreed by the Director of Public Works, a reservation in the form of an easement providing for public utility services shall be made in the vacated area. Section 5. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor and the City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary documents, including a Quit Claim Deed, in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSEi) by the City Council this day of 2004. P:ICity Council Agenda Packets\062204- R\Street Vacation Ordinance 15th st.doc Mayor, Michael DeVleming ATTEST: City Cleric, Chris Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Deputy City Attorney Cary Driskell Date of Publication: Effective Date: P:\City Council Agenda Packets1062204- RLStreet Vacation Ordinance 150 st.doc Exhibit "A" Property Description Street Vacation STV -01-04 1. That portion of 15 Avenue West of Batman Road abutting Parcels No. 35243.1041 and Parcel No. 35243.1014, being a parcel of approximately 60 feet wide by 192.5 long fora total approximate area of 11,550 square feet. 2. That portion of 1 5 Avenue West of Bettman Road abutting Parcels No. 35243.1048 and Parcel No. 35243.1027, being a parcel approximately 50 feet wide by 60 feet long for a total approximate area of 3,000 square feet. P :1Ciiy Council Agenda P8ckcis10622 04- R\Stroet Vamtion Ordinance IStli st_doc Name of Street/Alley Width (feet) Length (feet) Square Footage of Proposed Vacation Custer Street 60 100 6000 square feet Lloyd Street 60 100 6,000 square feet 12 Avenue 30 1,525 45,750 square feet 13 Avenue 60 330 19,800 sguare feet Block 2 Public Alley 12 300 300 3,600 square feet 3,600 square feet 3,600 square feet Block 3 Public Alle 12 Block 4 Public Alley 12 300 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ( new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report Q pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: PRESENTATION — Street Vacation Request (STV) -02 -04 in the Woodland Terrace Subdivision. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council adoption of Ordinance No. 04 -001 (Street Vacations) in January 2004. City Council was briefed on the proposed vacation on June 8, 2004. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on STV -02-04 on May 13, 2004. At the close of the public hearing the Commission recommended to the City Council conditional approval of the street vacation request. The applicants for STV -02 -04 are: 1) South Terrace Spokane, LLC, c/o Brian Main, 12810 East Nora Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99216; 2) Rocky Top, LLC, c/o Mike Schuler, 5813 East Fourth Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99212; 3) Andrew and Joanne M. Del Pozzi, 4614 East 13' Avenue, Spokane Valley, Washington 99202; and 4) Lindsey Construction, Inc., c/o Greg Stirn, P.O. Box 30792, Spokane, Washington 99223. STV -02 -04 requests the following approximate public right - of-way dimensions located within the Woodland Terrace Plat be vacated: RECOMMENDATION: Advance STV -02 -04 to second reading. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance O. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04- AN ORDINANCE'OF THE CiTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR THE VACATION OF PORTIONS OF 12 t " AVENUE, 13" AVENUE, CUSTER STREET, LLOYD STREET, AND PUBLIC ALLEYS LOCATED IN BLOCKS 2, 3 AND 4, ALL LOCATED WEST OF CHRONICLE ROAD IN TIC; WOODLAND TERRACE SUBDIVISION AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City Council through Resolution initiated the vacation of portions of 12" Avenue, 13 Avenue, Custer Street, Lloyd Street, and public alleys located in Blocks 2, 3, and 4, all located West of Chronicle Road in the Woodland Terrace Subdivision .by providing that a hearing on the proposal to .vacate the above street would be held before the Planning Commission on the 13th day of May, 2004 for the purpose of considering whether the vacation is in the public interest; WHEREAS, following a. hearing before the Planning Commission, it has been found and determined that the vacation of the above referenced street complies with City Ordinance 04- 002, Section 11(SVMC Chapter 10.05) and includes one or more of the following findings: (1) The change of use or vacation will serve the public interest; (2) The Street or Alley is no longer required for public use or access; or (3) An alternative public way or private access would be more useful to the public and adjoining land owners; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and/or minutes have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; WHEREAS, fifty percent of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated did not file a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk; - WHEREAS, through ordinance the City shall provide that the vacated property be transferred to -the abutting property owners, one -half to each, unless circumstances require a different division of property, that the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street shall attach to the vacated property; that a record of survey shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development and that all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street be paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred property; WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to RCW Chapter 35.79 and City Ordinance No. 04 -002 (SVMC Chapter 10.05) desires to vacate the above street as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, do ordain as follows: - P:\City Council Agenda Packets1062204- R\Streel Vaczition Ordinance 12 st.doe Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: (1) the City Department of Public Works has reviewed the right -of -way to be vacated and determined that the property adjacent to the vacated property is otherwise served by public or private access; (2) a public hearing on the proposed vacation has been held in accordance with State Law and City Ordinance before the Planning Coumiission with the record of such hearing and proceedings lodged with the City Clerk; (3) a written protest has not been filed with the City Clerk by at least fifty percent of the abutting property owners; and (4) vacation of the street or alley serves the public interest. Section 2. Property to be Vacated. Rased upon the above findings and in accordance with this ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley described on the attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Section 3. Zoning. The Zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The Director of Community Development is authorized to make this notation on the official zoning map of the City. Section 4. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by the City. 1. A record of survey shall be submitted to the City in accordance with City Ordinance 04 -002, Section 16 (SVMC Chapter 10.05). 2. Fees and Costs associated with the transfer of title to the vacated property shall be paid by the recipient (or grantee) of such property. The fees and costs include all direct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street. 3. Unless otherwise agreed by the Director of Public Works, a reservation in the form of an easement providing for public utility services shall be made in the vacated area. Section 5. Closin =. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor and the City Manager is authorized to execute all necessary documents, including a Quit Claim Deed, . in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Section 6. Severability. if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of 2004. P:\City Council Agenda Packets\062204- I21Street Vacation Ordinance 12 stdoc ATTEST: City Clerk, Chris 'Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Deputy City Attorney Cary Driskell Date of Publication: Effective Date: PACity Council Agenda Psicketc1062204- 10Street Vacation Ordinance 12 sl.doc Mayor, Michael DeVleming Name of Street/Alle Width feet Length feet Square Footage of Proposed Vacation Custer Street 60 100 6,000 square feet Lloyd Street 60 100 6,000 square feet 12 Avenue 30 1,525 45,750 square feet 13 Avenue 60 330 19,800 square feet Block 2 Public Alley 12 300 3,600 square feet Block 3 Public Alley 12 300 3,600 square feet Block 4 Public Alley 12 300 3,600 square feet Future Detention Property Description Street Vacation SW -02-04 Exhibit "A" illiaveifillrgi. '- •^ I �M _ turf ' *I Nu,. 111111 11 15th IP i ti t t t t t t t i r — r — r - * t I r P:1City Council Agenda Packets \0 R\Strect Vacation Ordinance 12 st.doc CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business Enew business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report (pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2003 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Remand GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A - Growth Management Act — Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan — Spokane Valley Interim Zoning Code PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council reviewed the 2003 amendments at its October 7, 2003, study session, and adopted amendments to the City's Interim Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map on October 28, 2003. The Council reviewed the remanded amendments at its June 8, 2004 regular meeting. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan provides for an annual comprehensive plan amendment process. The deadline for submitting comprehensive plan amendment requests was July 1, 2003. On August 28, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider 7 Comprehensive Plan requests. The Commission continued the hearing to September 11, 2003, requesting staff to develop an alternative recommendation for CPA- 03 -05. At the September 11 meeting the Commission finalized recommendations for the 7 comprehensive plan amendments. On October 28, 2003, the Spokane Valley City Council adopted the amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. The amendments were subsequently appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board by the City of Liberty Lake. Liberty Lake did not argue any substantive issues with the amendments; rather, Liberty Lake cited a procedural error where the Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106. The Hearings Board ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004 to satisfy the Hearings Board decision and the procedural requirement of RCW 36.70A.106. Notice of the proposed amendments was sent to CTED on April 8, 2003 via email. A letter confirming receipt of the notice was received by the Spokane Valley Community Development Department on April 12, 2004. The Commission's recommendations are consistent with their original recommendations with the exception of CPA- 03 -07, which are noted and underlined for clarity. The Comprehensive Plan Amendments, with Planning Commission Recommendations, are summarized below: 1. File No. CPA -03 -02 Location: South side of Appleway Avenue, east of Park Road Request: Change 3 acres from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Community Commercial and zone B -2 City Council Decision: Change to Community Commercial and zone B -2 Remand PC Recommendation: Community Commercial and 8 -2 zoning. 2. File No. CPA -03-01 Location: 8915 East Montgomery Request: Change 5 acres from Low Density Residential to Regional Commercial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Community Commercial and zone B -2 City Council Decision: Change to Community Commercial and zone B -2 Remand PC Recommendation: Community Center and zone B -2 3. File No. CPA -03 -03 Location: West side of Pines Road, between Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way and Mansfield Avenue Request: Change 2.5 acres from High Density Residential to Light Industrial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1 -2 City Council Decision: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1 -2 Remand PC Recommendation: Light Industrial and 1 -2 zoning. 4. File No. CPA -03 -04 Location: Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and north of 1 -90 (Golf Dome property) Request: Change 2.6 acres from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1 -2 City Council Decision: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1 -2 Remand PC Recommendation: Light Industrial and 1 -2 zoning. 5. File No. CPA -03 -05 Location: West of Pines Road between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue Request: Change 3 acres from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Original PC Recommendation: Change southern portion to Medium Density Residential and zone UR -12; no change on northern portion of parcel. City Council Decision: Change southern portion to Medium Density Residential and zone UR -12; no change on northern portion of parcel. Remand PC Recommendation: Change southern portion only to Medium Density Residential and UR -12 zoning only on southern portion. 6. File No. CPA -03 -06 Location: North side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Mamer Roads Request: Change 5 acres from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Original PC Recommendation: Change to High Density Residential and zone UR -22 City Council Decision: Change to High Density Residential and zone UR -22 Remand PC Recommendation: Change to High Density Residential and zone UR -22. 7. File No. CPA -03 -07 Location: Northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue Request: Change 3 acres from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Original PC Recommendation: Change to west portion of property to Medium Density Residential and zone UR -12; change east portion of property to Community Commercial and zone B -2 City Council Decision: Change to west portion of property to Medium Density Residential and zone UR -12; change east portion of property to Community Commercial and zone B -2 Remand PC Recommendation: Change easterly portion to Community Commercial and B -2 Zoning; change westerly portion of property to High Density Residential and UR -22 zoning. OPTIONS: The Council may adopt the Planning Commission recommendations, deny the requests, remand the requests back to the Planning Commission for further proceedings, or modify the Commission's recommendations after conducting a public hearing, per RCW 36.70A.035(2)(a). The Council may set a public hearing date at any regularly scheduled meeting. The public hearing requires at least 15 days public notice and all property owners within 400 feet of the proposal must be mailed an individual notice. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to advance ordinances to 2 reading, scheduled for July 13, 2004. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NIA STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director Greg McCormick, Long Range Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Individual ordinances for each amendment are attached to this RCA. Spokane Valley Planning Commission DRAFT Minutes Council Chambers — City H. al.l 11707 E. Sprague Ave. May 27, 2004 1. CALL TO ORDER Bill Gothmann, Planning Conunission Chair, called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m, TT. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Commission and audience recited the Pledge of Allegiance. III. ROLL CALL Fred Beaulac — Excused Absence Bob Blum — Present David Crosby — Present Gail Kogle — Present tV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Crosby moved that the agenda be approved as presented Commissioner Carroll seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 11 was moved by Commissioner Carroll and seconded by Commissioner Kogle that the minutes of the May 13, 2004 Planning Commission meeting be approved as presented Motion passed unanimously. VI. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public continent. Bill Gothrnann — Present Tan Robertson — Present John G. Carroll - Present VII. COMMISSION REPORTS Commissioner Gothmann reported that he will not be able to attend the Community Meeting on June 2 ", Commissioner Robertson will be there in his stead. DRAFT VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT Mr. McCormick. reminded the Planning Commission of the Community Meeting on Wednesday, June 2", at Greenacres Elementary School. The final Spring 2004 Community Meeting will be on June 1 7 at the Spokane Valley Church of the Nazarene. Ms. Sukup, who was unable to attend the meeting, asked Mr. McCormick to notify the Planning Commission that she will have three matters come before them in the near future: a proposal for an interim UR -1 Zone; an addition to the existing City Code regarding dimensional standards for residential and non- residential properties; and proposed Clear View Triangle standards. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. OLD BUSINESS: There was no Old Business. B. NEW BUSINESS: Public Hearing — Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments The Chair declared a Public Hearing to Consider Remanded 2003 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments open at 6:43 p.m. Members of the public were encouraged to fill out a card if they wished to speak to one of the amendments. The hearing on each amendment will follow these steps: • Announcement by Commission Chair • Staff overview and recommendation • Testimony by the applicant and/or property owner • Public Testimony (3- minute limit per person) • Commission deliberation and vote Greg McCormick, Long Range Planning Manager, briefly explained to the Commission and audience members that these amendments were adopted by the City Council on October 28, 2003, as recommended by the Planning Commission. The amendments were subsequently appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board by the City of Liberty Lake. Liberty Lake cited a procedural error where the Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106. The purpose of this Planning Commission hearing is to satisfy the Hearings' Board decision and the procedural requirement of RCW 36.70A.160. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -01 was opened at 6:45 p.m. CPA- 03 -01: The subject property is located on the north side of Montgomery Avenue about 300 feet west of Argonne Road with a street address of 8915 E. Montgomery Avenue, Spokane, Washington. The site is currently developed with a commercial car wash facility, self - storage and outdoor storage for trucks and recreational vehicles. Greg McCormick, Long Range Planning Manager, explained that the property owner requested a change in land use designation from Low Density Residential to Regional Commercial and a change in zoning 2 DRAFT D designation from Urban Residential 7 (UR -7) to Regional Business (B -3). The subject property was zoned commercial in 1970, but was rezoned under the recent Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and subsequent Phase 1 Zoning process. The original staff recommendation, which was adopted by City Council, was to change land use designation to Community Center and apply the Community Business (B -2) zone. Public testimony for CPA- 03 -01was opened at 6:52 p.m. Public Testimony: Alfred C. Bevacqua, 8820 E. Montgomery, Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Bevacqua is an opponent of CPA- 03 -01. He testified during the September 11, 2003 hearing with regard to trucks parking on the street across from his residence. At that time, Mr. Bevacqua provided the Commission copies of a letter dated December 7, 2000, written to Mr. Brumback by James Richardson, Associate Planner of Spokane County, addressing code violation complaints. He also provided a letter dated August 28, 2003, outlining his personal reasons for opposing CPA- 03 -01, along with a number of photos of trucks parked along his street. Since the City Council adopted the Planning Commission's recommendation for CPA- 03 -01, 18- wheelers have been driving down his street and it has become even more dangerous for children and elderly pedestrians. He strongly recommended that the Planning Commission vote against CPA - 03 -01. Public testimony for CPA -03 -02 was closed at 6:58 p.m.. A motion was made by Commissioner Robertson and seconded by Commissioner Crosby to recommend the following Staff Recommendation for CPA -03 -01 to City Council: Change land use designation to Community Center, with zoning of Community Business (B -2). The motion was seconded by Commissioner Crosby. Motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Gothmann suggested that Mr. Bevacqua's concerns about traffic should be handled by the City's Traffic Division, Police Department, or other authority. It is not a good situation for residents in this area. Perhaps developing a NO PARKING ZONE on one side of the street would help. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -01 was ended at 7:02 p.m. 3 DRAFT Public Hearing for CPA -03 -02 was opened at 7:03 p.m. CPA- 03 -02: The subject property is located on the south side of Appleway Boulevard, east of its intersection of Park Road and is approximately 3 acres in size. Subject property is currently vacant. Mr. McCormick explained that the applicant requested a change of land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial and zoning from Neighborhood Business (B -1) to Regional Business (B- 3). The main issue concerning this property is the potential impact commercial development will have on the Dishman Hills Natural Area, located south of the site. The original staff reconunendation, which was adopted by City Council, was to designate the property Community Conunercial and apply the Community Business (13 -2) zone. Public testimony for CPA -03 -02 was opened at 7:06 p.m. Applicant .lean Repp, President of Associated Restaurants, was present but declined to speak. Public testimony for CPA -03 -02 was closed at 7:07 p.m. It was moved by Commissioner Crosby that the Staff Recommendation to designate the property Community Commercial and apply the B -2 zone for CPA -03 -02 be submitted to City Council. Commissioner Carroll seconded the motion. Blum, Carroll, Crosby, Kogie and Robertson voted in favor of the motion. Chairman Gothmann opposed. Motion passed 5-1. • Commissioner Gothmann stated that he would personally prefer the site to remain a B -1 zone because of his concern for the Dishman Hills area. Commissioner Kogle reminded him of the staff s earlier assurance to the Commission that numerous environmental testing would be required before development on that land to insure continued integrity of surrounding property. Public Idearing for CPA -03 -02 was closed at 7:07 p.m. 4 DRAFT Public Hearing for CPA -03 -03 was opened at 7:08 p.m. CPA- 03 -03: The. subject property is located on the west side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad right - of-way and Mansfield Avenue. It consists of four separate parcels and is a total of approximately 2.5 acres in size. Subject property is currently vacant. Mr. McCormick indicated that the applicant requested a change in the land use designation from High Density Residential to Light Industrial and a change of zoning from Urban Residential (UR -22) to Light Industrial (1- 2). The original staffrecoinmendation, which was adopted by City Council, was for a land use designation change to Light Industrial, with a zone change to Light Industrial (I -2). There was no Public Testimony on CPA- 03 -03. Commissioner Robertson moved that the Planning Commission recommend changing the subject property land use designation to Light Industrial and the zoning to Light Industrial (I -2) to City Council. Commissioner Blum seconded the motion. Commissioners Blum, Crosby, Gothmann, Kogle and Robertson voted in favor of the motion. Commissioner Carroll opposed. Motion passed 5 -1. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -03 closed at 7:17 p.m. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -04 opened at 7:18 p.m. CPA- 03 -04: The subject property gains access from the terminus of Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and is located in the NE I /4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 43 EWM. It is comprised of approximately 2.57 acres and is currently developed with an enclosed golf practice facility. Mr. McCormick explained that the subject property was overlooked during the County's 2002 Comprehensive Plan update, and was therefore changed from Regional Commercial with a zoning designation of Regional Business (B -3) to Low Density Residential with a zoning of Urban Residential 7 (UR-7). This resulted in the existing use becoming "nonconforming ". 5 DRAFT The original staff.' recommendation, which was adopted by City Council, recommended a change of land use designation to Light Industrial and a change of zoning to Light Industrial (I -2). There was no Public Testimony on CPA- 03 -04. Commissioner Robertson proved, and Commissioner Blum seconded, a motion to recommend Council approval of the CPA -03 -04 Staff Recommendation to change land use designation to Light Industrial and zoning to ,Light Industrial (1 -2). Motion passed unanimously. Cotntnissioners briefly discussed the recent purchase of this parcel of land by Senske. The potential for large lots of chemicals being stored there is real, and they are concerned about risks to the surrounding property. Mr. Kuhta assured Commission that Critical Materials are strictly regulated. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -04 was closed at 7:23 p.m. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -05 was opened at 7:23 p.m. CPA- 03 -05: The subject property is located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, south side of Cataldo Avenue approximately 960 feet west of Fines Road. It is comprised of approximately 3 acres and is predominantly vacant with a single family dwelling existing on a portion of the property. Mr. McCormick indicated that the applicant requested a change of land use designation from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and a change of zoning from Urban Residential 3.5 (UR -3.5) to Urban Residential 22 (UR -22). The final staff recommendation, which was adopted by City Council, was to change land used designation only for the southern portion of the property to Medium Density Residential and zone UR -12 with no change on the northern portion of the parcel. Public Testimony for CPA -03 -05 was opened at 7:27 p.m. Planning Commission Vice - Chairman Robertson stated that he had received 33 cards from citizens present. The following citizens in attendance testified at the meeting: 6 DRAFT Joe Stoy, 1104 N. Perrine, Spokane Valley, WA He recommended that the Commission and Council adopt CPA -03 -05 as proposed in October, 2003. Gust Abariotes, 11708 E. Cataldo, Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Abariotes echoed Mr. Stoy's thoughts, and hopes the land owner doesn't return to to the Commission to change the zoning on the other half of his property. Clarion Bergland, 1018 N. Fox Road, Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Bergland agrees with what was adopted by City Council in October, 2003. Phyllis Moss, 11822 E. Boone, Spokane Valley, WA Mrs. Moss hopes that this time the matter will be settled. She doesn't want apartments built on the subject property because the traffic is so dangerous as it is. Leon Moss, 11 E. Boone, Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Moss would only oppose CPA -03 -05 if apartments were to be built on the subject property. Wilma Belcher, N. 1005 Perrine, Spokane Valley, WA Ms. Belcher is opposed to having apartments built across the street from her house. Joel C. Reit, N. 1012 Perrine Road, Spokane Valley, WA M�. Rell is opposed to having apartments built across Perrine on Cataldo. Nancy Kent, 812 N. Wilbur, Spokane Valley, WA Mrs. Kent is pleased with the recommendation, and doesn't want apartments built on the subject property. Chris Kcener, 11110 N. Fox. Road, Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Keener urged the Planning Commission to stick with their original recommendation. The following citizens in attendance did not speak, but signed public hearing cards: James Ren;gli, 1018 N. Perrine, Spokane Valley, WA Sarah Kautzman, 1004 N. Perrine Road, Spokane Valley, WA Johnny Belcher, 1005 N. Perrinc, Spokane Valley, WA Vicky Mass, 1108 N. Pcrrine Road, Spokane Valley, WA Carol Nicholson, N. 1105 Perrine, Spokane Valley, WA Larry VV. Kent, 812 N. Wilbur Road, Spokane Valley, WA 7 DRAFT Leonard Barrett, 1020 N. Wilbur Road, Spokane Valley, WA Gwen Barrett, 1.020 N. Wilbur Road, Spokane Valley, WA Nick Abariotes, 11813 E. Broadway, Spokane Valley, WA Tom Nicholson, N. 1105 Perrino, Spokane Valley, WA Walter Marion, 1017 N. Wilbur Road, Spokane Valley, WA Pat Parkcr, 1004 N. Fox Road, .Spokane Valley, WA W. D. Parker, 1004 N. Fox Road, Spokane Valley, WA Frances Warren, 11722 E. Cataldo, Spokane Valley, WA Marla Jo :Harper, 1.019 N. Perrine, Spokane Valley, WA Duane L. Harper, 1019 N. Perrine, Spokane Valley, WA Judith Bergland, 1018 N. Fox Road, Spokane Valley, WA Public Testimony for CPA -03 -05 was closed at 7:40 p.m. Commissioner Carroll moved that the Planning Commission recommend Council adoption of CPA- 03 -05, changing the southern portion of the subject property to Medium Density Residential and zone UR -.I2 with no change on northern portion of parcel. Conan ssioner Blunt seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Neighborhood representatives were complimented for their action in this matter. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -05 was closed at 7:43 p.m. The Commission took a brief break. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -06 was opened at 7:55 p.m. CPA- 03 -06: The subject property is located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Mamer Roads. It is comprised of approximately 5+ acres and is developed with Broadway Court Estates, which is an independent retirement complex for senior citizens, on the west portion of the subject property. Mr. McCormick explained that the applicant requested a change from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential land use designation and a corresponding zoning map amendment on the eastern portion of the site from Urban Residential 3.5 (UR -3.5) to Urban Residential 22 (UR -22) for the purpose of expanding the facility. The western portion of the site is currently zoned UR -22. The original staff recommendation, which was adopted by City Council. was to amend the land use designation of the property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential, including the separate parcel fronting Broadway and surrounded by the subject property, with the 8 DRAFT application of the Urban Residential 22 (UR -22) zone to the expansion area. There was no public testimony for CPA- 03 -06. A motion was made by Commissioner Kogle to recommend adoption of CPA -03 -05 by City Council; designating the entire site as High Density Residential and the zoning to Urban Residential 22 (UR -22). Commissioner Crosby seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -06 was closed at 7:59 p.m. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -07 was opened at 8:00 p.m. CPA- 03 -07: The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue. It is comprised of approximately 3 acres. The eastern half of the subject property is developed with a convenience store that includes a fast food restaurant and a gas station. The westerly half of the subject property is currently vacant. The applicant proposes to construct multi- family dwellings in this arca if the comprehensive plan and zoning map requests are approved. Mr. McCormick explained that the applicant had requested a change in land use from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential on the western portion, with a zoning of Urban Residential 22 (UR -22), and Community Coni.mercial, with a zoning of Community Business (13 -2) on the eastern portion. The original star recommendation, which was adopted by City Council, was for a change to Community Commercial designation, with a zoning of Community Business (13 -2) for the existing commercial business on the eastern portion of the site. Designating the western portion High Density Residential was not supported. It was recommended and approved that the western site be designated as Medium Density Residential, with a zoning of Urban Residential 12 (UR -12). Applicant Testimony: Dwight J. Hume, 9101 N. Mt. View Lane, Spokane, WA Mr. Hunie spoke on behalf of applicants Pring and Tonani. He provided the Commission with a letter detailing the history of the site, site specifics, and questions about the impact of designating the land as High Density Residential. He also submitted a copy of an aerial map highlighting the subject property and its surrounding industrial ties to the railroad and 9 DRAFT major arterials. Mr. Hume urged the Planning Commission to reconsider their original recommendation to the Council by honoring the applicants' original request to have 3 acres changed from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. Public Testimony for CPA -03 -07 was opened at 8:10 p.m. Howard Bruegeman, 18422 E. Sharp, Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Bruegeman didn't understand why the Planning Commission was considering a change from their original recommendation to the Council. High Density apartments will crowd the already -busy arterials during rush hour, and increase the amount of trash that lands in his yard. The following citizen in attendance did not speak, but signed a public hearing card: Vern Cox, 18419 E. Boone, Spokane Valley, WA Public Testimony for CPA -03 -07 was ended at 8:13 p.m. Applicant Response: John Peterson, E. 8412 Sprague, Spokane, WA Mr. Peterson spoke on behalf of the applicants, Mr. Pring and Mr. Tonani. He wished to restate his prior hearing pleadings by urging the Planning Commission to correct a 2002 zoning mistake that changed the subject property from Industrial 2 (I -2) to Urban Residential 7 (UR -7). The applicants would like to have more options for their land, and UR -22 would offer that flexibility. Mr. Peterson doesn't think the owners should be denied the same zoning consideration that property owners on the other side of the freeway have been given. Commissioner Blum moved to recommend a change to the land designation of the west portion ojthe properly to High Density Residential, with Urban Residential 22 (UR -22) zoning; and a change to the eastern portion of the property to Con:muuity Commercial with a Business 2 (B -2) zoning. Commissioner Carroll seconded the motion. Commissioners Blum, Carroll, Kogle, Gothmann and Robertson voted in favor of the motion. Commissioner Crosby opposed. Motion passed 5-1. Chairman Crosby stated that he believes that UR -22 designation is out of character with the present neighborhood. The subject property doesn't have Barker Road frontage. There was a brief discussion about the pros and cons of this reconuuended change. Public Hearing for CPA -03 -07 was closed at 8:28 p.m. 10 DRAFT r� Discussion of Comprehensive Plan Private Utilities Chapter Draft Mr. McCormick provided the Planning Commission with an overview of the City of Spokane Valley's Comp Plan draft of Chapter 6 — Private Utilities. This chapter is required by CMA, and does not include sanitary sewer, Stormwater or other water issues which are covered in the Capital Facilities Plan. Commissioner Gotlunann had a few notes written on his draft that he gave to Mr. McCormick for editing purposes. Commissioner Crosby mentioned the impact of growing cell tower building taking place in the region. Mr. McCormick explained that if this is a big issue, this section of the draft chapter will need to be built up or amended to take care of it. Public Comment: Doug Kelley, Representing Avista Utilities, 1411 E. Mission, Spokane. Mr. Kelley stated that he saw this draft chapter for the first time on Monday and was overwhelmed by the 17 different implementation strategies. He requested additional consideration of the following strategies: PUI -8: Mr. Kelley will submit documentation to Mr. McCormick containing additional wording for this section. PUI -9 and 10: Mr. Kelley will submit legal documentation to Mr. McComuck regarding case law on underground lines. PUI -1.1.: Mr. Kelley recommended that staff take a close look at Spokane County's Phase 11 Plan with regard to landscaping around utilities. Mr. Kelley requested that staff consistently use either the word "should" or "shall" throughout the Implementation Strategies section to eliminate confusion. Dan Villalobos, Representing Inland Power & Light, 320 E. 2 Avenue, Spokane. Mr. Villalobos echoed MT. Kelley's sentiments regarding PUI 8 -11. There are a number of costs involved that ought to be discussed in advance. EMI. effects are no known about underground lines. He also suggested that the City help Mr. Bevacqua with the traffic problem on his street. X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER There were no announcements. 11 DRAFT XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:53 p.m. SUBMITTED: APPROVED: Debi Alley Administrative Assistant 12 13i11 Gothmann Chairman DRAFT DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASFHNGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04-022 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF THE. CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase 1 Development Regulations as the Interim Development: Regulations of the City through Ordinance No. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the Interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; WHEREAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan, Interim Development Regulations and Interim Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more of the following: the Interim Comprehensive Plan, Interim Comprehensive Plan Map, Interim Development Regulations and/or Interim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the Planning Commission concerning the application; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence and information on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive flan designation for the subject property to Community Commercial and the zoning to 13 -2, Community Business; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -089 adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (EWGMI-II3), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -022; CPA 03 -02 Page I of 3 DRAFT WHEREAS, the EWGMHI3 ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted 5 to 1 to recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the interim City Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the Interim City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth in RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. Property. The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley interim Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA -03 -02 Location: South side of Appleway Avenue, east of Park Road Property Description: Parcel No. 45192.9181 and a portion of Parcel No. 45192.9182 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial Ordinance 04 -022; CPA 03 -02 Page 2 of 3 C DRAFT Section 5. Zoning Map /Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -02 Location: South side of Appleway Avenue, east of Park Road Property Description: Parcel No. 45192.9181 and a portion of Parcel No. 45192.9182 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from B -1 to 13 -2 Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached Interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the Interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File- Administrative Action. The Interim Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) and Interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility fbr compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this _ day of , 2004 ATTEST: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -022; CPA 03 -02 Page 3 of 3 Attachment A aimmilloup Dal 1111111111 ,I 111111 11 11111 11 1011111 I1111111111M Aupu51 15, 2003 390 1 IFeet Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -03 -02 Srn�r�____r (K1'LU�i .... CPA -03 -02 Attachment `A' DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE. COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04-021 AN ORDINANCE OF TI3E CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase I Development Regulations as the Interim Development Regulations of the City through Ordinance NO. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the Interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; VVT- IER.FAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan Development Regulations and Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more of the following: the Interim Comprehensive Plan, Interim Comprehensive. Plan Map, Interim Development Regulations and/or Interim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose. of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the Planning Commission concerning the application and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence and information on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property to Community Center and the zoning to B -2, Community Business: and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -088, adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management i- learings Board (EWCMHB), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the EWGMHB ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -021; CPA 03 -01 Page 1 of 3 DRAFT WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the City Interim Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the Interim City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth in RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. Property. The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA -03 -01 Location: 8915 East Montgomery Property Description: Parcel No. 45071.9089 and a portion of 45071.9088 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from Low Density Residential to Community Center Ordinance 04-021; CPA 03 -01 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT Section 5. Zoning Map /Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -01 Location: 8915 East Montgomery Property Description: Parcel No. 45071.9089 and a portion of 45071.9088 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from UR -7 to B-2 Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached Interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File- Administrative Action. The Interim Comprchcn.sive Plan (with Maps) and interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to.modify the Interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2004. ATTEST: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -021; CPA 03 -01 Page 3 of 3 Attachment A I 40.1 mum ,. UMW thr. CUM REIM. WU boo {1 �1s'111i IM C IS' it na Sri //��4!�� 11[11 {11 {� ' N �1 1�1 11 IN111I» p!! JI1S1 u R1 ..� 1 i1Iir ■sio t !U ,� ; sir Sr.' �1: awl ■r ui M r ma wai , — :' M % %S I 4l1,i4lIu • j . *, no— -I, °Lt gairl *-1-4 air. :# 11Ms�"f ` I I I�r1s 1 1iI 6 � r~1h"� nano, pa glli! 4111111CM .mss '-1'�1�11 �: Torgaitaimpl UM SW August 15, 2003 430 Feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -03 -01 Stiola j e t Vd11 CPA -03 -01 Attachment `A' DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04 -023 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF' SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase I Development Regulations as the interim Development Regulations of the City through Ordinance NO. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; WHEREAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations and Interim Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more of the following: the Interim Comprehensive Plan, interim Comprehensive Plan Map, Interim Development Regulations and /orT.nterim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the Planning Commission concerning the application and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence and information on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property to Light Industrial and the zoning to 1 -2, and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -090, adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (EWGMT -1B), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane. Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the EWGMHB ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -023; CPA -03 -03 Page 1 of 3 DRAFT WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the Interim City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth in RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. [ perty. The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Man Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the Interim City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA -03 -03 Location: West side of Pines Road, between Union Pacific Railroad right -of -way and Mansfield Avenue Property Description: Parcel No. 45094.0422, 45094.0423, 45094.0428 and 45094.0429. Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from High Density Residential to Light Industrial Section 5. Zoning Map/Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby Ordinance 04 -023; CPA -03 -03 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -03 Location: West side of Pines Road, between Union Pacific. Railroad right -of -way and Mansfield Avenue Property Description: Parcel No. 45094.0422, 45094.0423, 45094.0428 and 45094.0429. Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from UR -22 to 1-2 Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached Interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the Interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File- Administrative Action. The Interim Comprehensive. Plan (with Maps) and Interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the Interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or or;anizations. Section 9. Severability. if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect: five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this day of , 2004. ATTEST: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -023; CPA -03 -03 Page 3 of 3 Attachment A August 15, 2003 390 Feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -03 -03 n' k_� e ( j Valley CPA -03 -03 Attachment `A' CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04 -024 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMEND1? G THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF TITE CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED TRE.ItETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase I Development Regulations as the Interim Development Regulations of the City through Ordinance No. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the Interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; WHEREAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations and Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more of the following: the Interim Comprehensive Plan, Interim Comprehensive Plan Map, interim Development Regulations and /or Interim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the. Planning Commission concerning the application and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence and information on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property to Light Industrial and the zoning to 1 -2; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -091, adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (EWGMHB), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, 'Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the EWGMH13 ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -024; CPA -03 -04 Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHER,EAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the Interim City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth its RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. Property. The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA -03 -04 Location: Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and north of 1 -90 (Golf Dome property) Property Description: Parcel No. 3 5131.1 116 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment. "A" from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial Section 5. Zoning Map /Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby Ordinance 04 -024; CPA -03 -04 Page 2 of 3 amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -04 Location: Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and north of I -90 (Golf Dome property) Property Description: Parcel No. 35131.1116 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from UR -7 to 1 -2 Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached Interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the Interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File- Administrative Action. The Interim Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) and Interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the Interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause. or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this _ day of 2004 ATTEST: Michael De\'leming, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -024; CPA -03 -04 Page 3 of 3 DR AFT Attachment A August 15, 2003 400 1 Feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -03 -04 \t T1 kane . CPA -03 -04 Attachment `A' DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04 -025 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKAi\T COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED TI {ERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase I Development .Regulations as the Interim Development Regulations of the City through Ordinance No. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the Interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; WHEREAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations and Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more of the following: the Interim Comprehensive Plan, Interim Comprehensive Plan Map, interim Development Regulations and/or Interim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the Planning Commission concerning the application and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence and information on the application; and W1- IER.EAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for the southern portion of the subject property to Medium Density Residential and the zoning to UR -12, with no change to the northern portion of the parcel; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -092, adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEitEAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (EWGMHB), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the EWGMHB ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -025; CPA -03 -05 Page 1 of 3 DRAFT WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the interim City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth in RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. Pro . The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley interim Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA -03 -05 Location: West of Pines Road between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue Property Description: The south portion of Parcel No. 45161.1 as shown on Attachment "A." Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential Ordinance 04 -025; CPA -03 -05 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT Section 5. Zoning hv[an /Of vial Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.I00, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect: to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -05 Location: West of Pines Road between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue Property Description: The south portion of Parcel No. 45 1 61.1170, as shown on Attachment "A." Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from UR -3.5 to UR -12 Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached Interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File - Administrative Action. The Interim Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) and Interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the Interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the. City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this _ day of , 2004 ATTEST: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -025; CPA -03 -05 Page 3 of 3 Vicinity Map Augur 15. 2043 410 Feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -03 -05 Siam , :ley CPA -03 -05 Attachment `A' DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE' NO. 04 -026 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED'T'HLRETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase I Development Regulations as the Interim Development Regulations of the City through Ordinance No. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the Interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; WHEREAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the interim City Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations and Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more of the following: the Interim Comprehensive Plan, Interim Comprehensive Plan Map, Interim Development Regulations and/or Interim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the Planning Commission concerning the application and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence and information on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property to High Density Residential and the zoning to UR -22; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -093, adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (EWGMHI3), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per R.CW 36.70A.106; and W1-IER.EAS, the EWGMHT3. ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -026; CPA -03 -06 Page I of DRAT f WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WV IEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend that City Council approve the proposed amendment; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the Interim City Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the Interim City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth in RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. Property. The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA - - Location: North side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Mamer Roads Description: The West '/z of the West 1/2 of Tract 106 of Vera as recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30 in Spokane County, Washington, EXCEPT the South 10 feet thereof as conveyed to Spokane County by deed recorded under recording no. 8604280359. TOGETHER WITH the East'/ of the West'' /z of Tract 106, EXCEPT the South 228 feet of the West 85 feet of the said East 14 of the West 1/2 of Tract 106, Ordinance 04 -026; CPA -03 -06 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT EXCEPT the South 10 feet conveyed to Spokane County, recorded under recording no. 8606160441. TOGETHER WITH the West 67.0 feet of the North 160 feet of the East '/x of the Tract 106 of Vera. TOGETHER WITH the South 97.6 feet of the North 257.6 feet of the East 'A of Tract 106 of Vera, EXCEPT the East 105 feet. TOGETHER WITH the South 120 feet of the North 377.6 feet of the East %] of Tract 106 of Vera, EXCEPT the East 105 feet; and Parcel No. 4515L1421 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Section 5. Zoning Map /Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -06 Location: North side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Mamer Roads Description: See Above (that portion of property not currently zoned UR -22). Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from UR -3.5 to UR -22 (that portion of property not currently zoned UR -22) Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached Interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the Interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on File- Administrative Action. The 'Interim Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) and Interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the Interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liability. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. ATTEST: PASSED by the City Council this _ day of , 2004 Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Michael DeVleming, Mayor Ordinance 04 -026; CPA -03 -06 Page 3 of 3 DRAFT Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -026: CPA -03 -06 Page 4 of 3 DRAFT Attachment A August 15, 2003 400 Feet Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA-03-06 CPA-03-06 Attachment A DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDiNANCll NO. 04 -027 AN ORDINANCE OF THI CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING MAPS OF THE CITY AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, incorporated on March 31, 2003 and adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set forth below: (1) Comprehensive Plan, Capital Facilities Plan, and Maps as the Interim Comprehensive Plan of the City through Ordinance No. 52; (2) The Spokane County Zoning Code as supplemented and amended by the Phase i Development Regulations as the Interim Development Regulations of the City through Ordinance No. 53; and (3) The Spokane County Zoning Maps as the Interim Zoning Maps of the City through Ordinance No. 54; WHEREAS, to facilitate and promote reasonable land use in the City it is periodically necessary to review and amend the interim City Comprehensive Plan, Development Regulations and Zoning Map following a public process before the Planning Commission and City Council; WHEREAS, the owner and or applicant of the property described in this Ordinance submitted an application to the City to modify one or more oldie following: the interim Comprehensive Plan, interim Comprehensive Plan Map, interim Development Regulations and/or Interim Zoning Map of the City for the purpose of beneficially using the property described herein; WHEREAS, following the application to the City, staff conducted environmental review to determine the potential environmental impacts from the request in the application, made a recommendation to the Planning Commission concerning the application and; Wi- I.EREAS, the Planning Commission, following notice and a public hearing, received evidence • and information on the application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to change the Comprehensive Plan designation for the subject property to Medium Density Residential and UR -I2 zone on the west portion; Community Commercial and B -2 zone on the east portion of the property; and WHEREAS, on October 28, 2003, the City Council passed Ordinance No. 03 -094, adopting the Planning Commission's recommendation; and WHEREAS, the City of Liberty Lake appealed the amendment to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board (EWGMI -iB), citing a procedural error wherein the City of Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the EWGMHB ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.106; and Ordinance 04 -027; CPA -03 -07 Page 1 of 3 DRAFT WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendments was emailed to CTED on April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, CTED confirmed receipt of the notice in a letter to the City of Spokane Valley dated April 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley published a notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing in the Valley News Herald on May 7, 2004; and WHEREAS, notice of the Planning Commission remand hearing was mailed to property owners of record within 400 feet of the proposed amendment at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, notice of the proposed amendment was posted on the site at least 15 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 27, 2004, to consider the proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, after hearing public testimony, the Commission voted 5 to 1 to change their original recommendation to City Council, thus recommending approval of the applicant's original proposed amendment; and NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley do ordain as follows: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend the City Comprehensive Plan and Map(s) adopted through Ordinance No. 52 and amend the City Zoning Map adopted through Ordinance No. 54 in order to permit the property described herein to be used in a matter consistent with the same. Section 2. Findings. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission: (1) conducted appropriate investigation and study; (2) held a public. hearing on the Application; and (3) recommends approval of the amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan and Interim Zoning Code set forth in this Ordinance in a manner which promotes the best interest of the City through appropriate and reasonable land uses. The City Council further recognizes that the amendments set forth herein promote the best interests of the City and fulfill the objectives of the Growth Management Act as set forth in RCW 36.70A, do not cause a significant environmental impact (as mitigated or otherwise) and promote the reasonable and orderly development of the City. Section 3. Property. The property which is subject to this Ordinance is described on the attached Exhibit "A." Section 4. Comprehensive Plan and Map Amendment. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 52 is hereby amended as set forth on the attached Exhibit "A." The Plan Amendment is generally described as follows: File No. CPA -03 -07 Location: Northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue Property Description: Parcel No. 55181.2601 and Parcel No. 55181.2603 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and Community Commercial Ordinance 04 -027; CPA -03 -07 Page 2 of 3 DRAFT Section 5. Zoning Map /Official Controls. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.100, for the purpose of regulating the use of land and to implement and give affect to the Comprehensive Plan the City hereby amends the Official Zoning Map of the City as set forth on Exhibit "A." The Zoning Map Amendment is generally described below. File No. CPA -03 -07 Location: Northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue Property Description: Parcel No. 55181.2601 and Parcel No. 55181.2603 Decision: Change property shown on Attachment "A" from UR -7 to UR -22 arid B -2. Section 6. Adoption of Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation referenced in the attached interim Zoning Map(s) is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the Interim Zoning Map(s), then such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or regulation is hereby adopted by reference. Section 7. Map - Copies on Pile- Administrative Action. The Interim Comprehensive Plan (with Maps) and Interim Zoning Map(s) are maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Department of Community Development. The City Manager or designee, following adoption of this Ordinance, is authorized to modify the interim Comprehensive Plan Map and the Interim Zoning Map in a manner consistent with this Ordinance. Section 8. Liabili The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this ordinance shall rest with the permit applicant and their agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted with the express intent to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public and are not intended to protect any particular class of individuals or organizations. Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance. Section 10. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after the date of publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City. PASSED by the City Council this _ day of , 2004. ATTEST: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04 -027; CPA -03 -07 Page 3 of 3 Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 0 old business x new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 04 -018 Amending Resolution 04 -007 Creating Student Advisory Council GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: Proposed changes to Resolution 04 -007, Creating the Student Advisory Council, as shown on the attached redline version. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 04 -01808 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE RESOLUTION CREATING THE STUDENT ADVISORY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. WHEREAS, the City Council for Spokane Valley did adopt by Resolution No. 04 -007 Creating the Student Advisory Council for the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS. changes in certain wording have been suggested to more accurately reflect the intent: of the resolution creating the Student Advisory Council; and Speka a provide for -th t1 WHEREAS, tile -Gi4 et+l -Feeeg es-th *4he -you fer- Spokane ., n d ie1 r-tho City's future; and site fint1tion by the City Couneil, of an advisory futufe etnmonity- possess- n- vi&it,n-foF Spokane NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, that Resolution 04 -007 he amended as follows: Section I. Creation. There is created the Spokane Valley Student Advisory Council. The purpose of the Student Advisory Council is to study and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council on issues concerning the City. The Student Advisory Council may consider issues upon request from the City Council, or may consider issues raised by the Student Advisory Council pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted by the Student Advisory Council under Section 3(C) of this resolution. Section 2. Membership. A. Appointment: Members of the Student Advisory Council shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four (4) members of the City Council. Student Advisory Council members shall serve without compensation. 13. presentation: The Student Advisory Council shall consist of fifteen (15) voting members. There shall be three (3) representatives from Central Valley High School, three (3) from University High School, two (2) from East Valley High School, two (2) from West Valley High School, one (I) from Valley Christian, the Mayor of Spokane Valley, the City Manager of Spokane Valley or his designee, one (1) representative of the business community of Spokane Valley, and one (1) at -large student to be appointed by the other fourteen (14) members (at -large member must be a City Resolution 04 -007 Creating Student Advisory Council Page 1 of 3 resident, between 14 -20 years of age and cannot be attending any of the high schools currently represented). C. Length of terms: Each member of the Student Advisory Council shall serve a one -year term. Each one -year term shall be from September 1 to June 30. D. Removal: Members of the Student Advisory Council may be removed by the Mayor or appointee, with the concurrence of the City Council for any just cause detailed in the by -laws: or for uncxcuscd absence from three (3) consecutive r'egudsr- meetings. The decision of the City Council regarding membership on, or removal from, the Student Advisory Council shall be final and without appeal. E. Vacancies: Vacancies occurring other than through the expiration of terms shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner as for appointments. Section 3. Meetings — Rules: A. The Student Advisory Council shall organize at its first meeting in September of each year and elect from its members a Chair, who shall preside at all meetings of the Student Advisory Council and perform such other functions as determined by rule. A Vice -Chair shall also be elected to preside in the absence of the Chair. A tttttjeFky of the Student Advisory Couneid slab con t n t+etian- of -busi nessra nd ti m : - Fit+' "—be— _ te .-y ttny-pfopesitiett- ATTEST: Adopted this 3$'" day of June Merl, 2004. 13. The Student Advisory Council shall determine a regular monthly meeting schedule (time, place and frequency )- and- shal4 -me nth. All meetings shall be open to the public. C. The Student Advisory Council shall adopt such rules and regulations as are necessary for the conduct of business. Prior to implementation, all such rules and regulations, including any proposed by -laws, shall he approved by the Spokane. Valley City Council. Section 4. Staff Support: The Student Advisory Council is strongly encouraged to be self - sufficient and provide its own support to the greatest extent possible.. City staff members can be consulted on approval of the City Manager. Section 5. Severability: if any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution shall he held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effective upon adoption. City of Spokane Valley Michael DeVleming, Mayor Resolution 04 -007 Creating Student Advisory Council Page 2 of 3 Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Resolution 04-007 Creating Student Advisory Council Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 04-018 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE RESOLUTION CREATING THE STUDENT ADVISORY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. WHEREAS, the City Council for Spokane Valley did adopt by Resolution No. 04 -007 Creating the Student Advisory Council for the City of Spokane Valley; and WHEREAS, changes in certain wording have been suggested to more accurately reflect the intent of the resolution creating the Student Advisory Council; and NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane. County, Washington, that Resolution 04 -007 be amended as follows: Section 1. Creation. There is created the Spokane Valley Student Advisory Council. The purpose of the Student Advisory Council is to study and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council on issues concerning the City. The Student Advisory Council may consider issues upon request from the City Council, or may consider issues raised by the Student Advisory Council pursuant to the rules of procedure adopted by the Student Advisory Council under Section 3(C) of this resolution. Section 2. Membership. A. j pointment: Members of the Student Advisory Council shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four (4) members of the City Council. Student Advisory Council members shall serve without compensation. B. Representation: The Student Advisory Council shall consist of fifteen (15) voting members. There shall be three (3) representatives from Central Valley High School, three (3) from University High School, two (2) from East Valley High School, two (2) from West Valley High School, one (1) from Valley Christian, the Mayor of Spokane Valley, the City Manager of Spokane Valley or his designee, one (1) representative of the business community of Spokane Valley, and one (1) at -large student to be appointed by the other fourteen (14) members (at -large member must be a City resident, between 14 -20 years of age and cannot be attending any of the high schools currently represented). C. Length of terms: Each member of the Student Advisory Council shall serve a one -year term. Each one -year term shall be from September 1 to June 30. D. Removal: Members of the Student Advisory Council may be removed by the Mayor or appointee, with the concurrence of the City Council for any just cause detailed in the by -laws. The decision of the City Council regarding membership on, or removal from, the Student Advisory Council shall be final and without appeal. E. Vacancies: Vacancies occurring other than through the expiration of terms shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner as for appointments. Resolution 04 -007 Creating Student Advisory Council Page 1 of 2 Section 3. Meetings — Rules: A. The Student Advisory Council shall organize at its first meeting in September of each year and elect from its members a Chair, who shall preside at all meetings of the Student Advisory Council and perform such other functions as determined by rule. A Vice -Chair shall also be elected to preside in the absence of the Chair. B. The Student Advisory Council shall determine a regular monthly meeting schedule. (time, place and frequency). All meetings shall be open to the public. C. The Student Advisory Council shall adopt such rules and regulations as are necessary for the conduct of business. Prior to implementation, all such rules and regulations, including any proposed by -laws, shall be approved by the Spokane Valley City Council. Section 4. Staff' Support: The Student Advisory Council is strongly encouraged to be self- sufficient and provide its own support to the greatest extent possible. City staff members can be consulted on approval of the City Manager. Section 5. Severability: If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence clause or phrase of this resolution. Section 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effective upon adoption. ATTEST: Adopted this day of .Lune , 2004. Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Resolution 04 -007 Creating Student Advisory Council Page 2 of 2 m City of Spokane Valley Michael DeVleming, Mayor CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business lei public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2005 — 2010 Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six -year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2004 -2006 Six Year TIP last year on June 10, 2003, Resolution #03 -037. Adopted Amended 2004 -2009 Six Year TIP on December 23, 2003, Resolution #03 -055, to include Bowdish /24 Avenue Sidewalk grant project. BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public hearing adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before July 1 of each year. Staff presented to Council a draft 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP at the April 6, 2004 study session and at the June 8, 2004 Council public meeting. The proposed TIP in large part reflects the 2004- 2009 adopted Six Year TIP prepared last year by the interim staff and Spokane County. Proposed changes from last year's TIP include: • Adding the widening of 8' Avenue from Havana to Park Road to a 3 -lane urban section (2005) • Adding Sullivan Road North Extension in coordination with Spokane County's Bigelow Gulch project (2005) • Identifying four road rehabilitation projects for federal funding (Broadway Ave., Wellesley Ave., Park Rd. and Dishman Mica Road) (2005) • Rescheduling the Couplet project from 2008 to 2006 • Delaying Park Road Grade Separation (Bridging the Valley) to 2006 to coincide with revised schedule • Delaying to 2009 the widening of 32n Avenue from SR27 to Best Road (City limit) to coincide with County's schedule for widening 32 " Avenue from Best Road to Sullivan. OPTIONS: Accept or revise project list and/or project schedule RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Adopt 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City's share of the proposed projects will be budgeted within the Street Capital Projects Fund which has the revenue resources to accommodate the proposed TIP. STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Steve Worley ATTACHMENTS: 1) Summary description of proposed projects 2) List of Draft 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP projects 3) Draft 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP, 2005 Annual Construction Program 4) Map of Draft 2005 -2006 Six Year TIP DRAFT WHEREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the. City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six Year Transportation Improvement Program ( "TIP ") with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; WHEREAS, the TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; WHEREAS, the TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 22, 2004 for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed TIP; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, the adoption of the Six Year Street Plan is a nonproject action which has received proper and timely environmental review by the City. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: The City Council hereby adopts the attached TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2005 through 2010. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2005 -2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation not later than June 30. The TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Adopted this 22' day of June, 2004. ATTEST: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2005 -2010 SIX -YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY. Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHH' GTON RESOLUTION NO. 04-019 City of Spokane. Valley Michael DeV leming, Mayor W:\ cbainbridge \ResohrtionslRcsolution 04 -019 for 2005 -2010 Six Year TIP 6.22- 04.DOC Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ® old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration — Set Election Date of September 14, 2004 for Annexation to Fire Districts One and Eight GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 52.04 provides for the establishment of fire services within newly incorporated cities. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On January 20, 2004, the Spokane Valley City Council adopted Ordinance 04 -003, "providing for the submission of a proposition to the qualified voters of Spokane Valley for approval or rejection of annexation to Spokane County Fire District 1 and Spokane County Fire District 8." This Ordinance did not specify a date to place this issue on the ballot. BACKGROUND: The Boundary Review Board reviewed the proposed annexation pursuant to RCW 36.93.090, and issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusion, which approved it on June 14, 2004 for placement on the ballot. Spokane Valley must now pass a motion to request the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution placing the election on an upcoming ballot — staff recommends the September 14, 2004 election date. The City of Spokane Valley is temporarily annexed to Fire Districts One and Eight. That temporary annexation expires as of January 1, 2005. OPTIONS: Select the September 14 election date; choose another election date; provide additional direction to staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to submit a letter to the Board of County Commissioners requesting that the issue of whether Spokane Valley should annex to Fire District 1 and Fire District 8 be put on the September 14, 2004 ballot. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Spokane Valley will share in the cost of the election. The amount depends upon the number of ballot issues sharing that election date. The cost of this issue will be share by the City of Spokane Valley and the two Fire Districts. STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off. Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business xx new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval for City Manager to execute a contract for a Parks & Recreation Master Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION Procurement of Architectural and Engineering Services, Chapter 3.45.020, Spokane Valley Municipal Code was followed for the selection process. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Funding of Master Plan in 2004 Budget BACKGROUND: The City has determined that a Parks and Recreation Master Plan should be developed to guide the future acquisition, development, and operation of park and recreation facilities and programs. The plan also includes a feasibility study for a swimming pool or other aquatic facility. In response to advertisements, the City received 10 Statements of Qualifications from firms interested in developing the Master Plan. After review of the qualifications, staff chose four of the applicants to submit proposals and attend interviews. Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. (MIG) was selected as the most qualified firm. The Parks and Recreation Director checked references and made the final recommendation. OPTIONS: Authorize the City Manager to finalize and sign an agreement with Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. Propose other action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Estimated at $83,260. The budgeted amount for this project is $80,000. The additional funds are available within the Recreation Budget. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director ATTACHMENTS Agreement for professional services between the City of Spokane Valley and Moore Iacofano Goltsman, Inc. AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Moore lacofano Goltsman, Inc. DR FT THIS AGREEMENT is made by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a code City of the State of Washington, hereinafter "City" and Moore lacofano Goltsman, inc hereinafter "Consultant," jointly referred to as "parties." IN CONS.iDERATION of the terms and conditions contained herein the parties agree as follows: 1. Work to be Performed. The Consultant will provide all labor, services and material to satisfactorily complete the attached Scope of Services in Exhibit A. A. Administration. The City Manager or designee shall administer and be the primary contact for Consultant. Prior to commencement of work, Consultant shall contact the City Manager or designee to review the Scope of Work, schedule and date of completion. Upon notice from the City Manager or designee Consultant shall commence work, perform the requested tasks in the Scope of Work, stop work and promptly curc any failure in performance under this agreement. 13. Representations. The City has relied upon the qualifications of the Consultant in entering into this agreement. 13y execution of this agreement, Consultant represents it possesses the ability, skill and resources necessary to perform the work and is familiar with all current laws, rules and regulations which reasonably relate to the Scope of Work. No substitutions of personnel shall be made without the written consent of the City. Consultant shall be responsible for the technical accuracy of its services and documents resulting therefrom, and City shall not be responsible for discovering deficiencies therein. Consultant shall correct such deficiencies without additional compensation except to the extent such action is directly attributable to deficiencies in City furnished information. C. Modifications. The City may modify this agreement and order changes in the work whenever necessary or advisable. The Consultant will accept modifications when ordered in writing by the City Manager or designee. Compensation for such modifications or changes shall be as mutually agreed between the parties. The Consultant shall make such revisions in the work as are necessary to correct errors or omissions appearing therein when required to do so by the City without additional compensation. 2. Term of Contract. This Agreement shall be in bull force and effect upon execution and shall remain in effect until completion of all contractual requirements. This Agreement shall cover services rendered from Julyl, 2004 until July 1, 2005. Work will not begin until July 1, 2004. Either party may terminate this Agreement by ten (10) days written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily performed prior to the termination date. 3. Compensation. The City agrees to pay the Consultant 583,260 as full compensation for everything done under this agreement Extra services may be requested by the City as denoted in Exhibit A or as otherwise requested by the City and confirmed in writing by MIG. The City shall reimburse the Consultant Agreement for Professional Services Page I of 5 for photocopying, postage, graphic reproduction at actual cost and will pay for authorized travel (excluding travel to the City to attend meetings, presentations or otherwise perform the services herein) at a rate of $.32 per mile. 4. Payment. The Consultant shall be paid monthly upon presentation of an invoice to the City. Applications for payment shall be sent to the City Clerk at the below stated address. For extra services not part of this agreement, payment shall be made based on hourly rates in Exhibit B. The City reserves the right to withhold payment under this agreement which is determined in the reasonable judgment of the City Manager or designee to be noncompliant with the Scope of Work, City Standards, City ordinances and federal or state standards. 5. Notice. Notice shall be given in writing as follows: 1'O THE CITY: Name: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Phone Number: (509)921 -1000 Address: 11707 East Sprague Ave, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 TO THE CONSULTANT: Name: Adele Torreano Phone Number: (503)297 -1005 Address: 412 NW 13 Ave Portland, OR 927209 6. Applicable Laws and Standards. The parties, in the performance of this agreement, agree to comply with all applicable Federal, State, local laws, ordinances, and regulations. 7. Relationship of the Parties. It is understood, agreed and declared that the Consultant shall be an independent Consultant and not the agent or employee of the City, that the City is interested in only the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the services are performed is solely within the discretion of the Consultant. Any and all employees who provide services to the City under this agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the Consultant. The Consultant shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. 8. Ownership of Documents. All drawings, plans, specifications, and other related documents prepared by the Consultant under this agreement are and shall be the property of the City. 9. Records. The City or State Auditor or any of their representatives shall have full access to and the right to examine during normal business hours all of the Consultant's records with respect to all matters covered in this contract. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, payrolls and record of matters covered by this contract for a period of three years from the date final payment is made hereunder. 10. Insurance. During the term of the contract, the Consultant shall maintain in force at its own expense, the following insurance: A. Workers' Compensation Insurance in compliance with RCW 51.12.020, which requires subject employers to provide workers' compensation coverage for all their subject workers and Employer's Liability or Stop Gap Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00; Agreement for Professional Services Page 2 of 5 13. General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis with acombined single limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. It shall include contractual liability coverage for the indemnity provided under this contract. It shall provide that the City, its officers, employees and agents are additional insureds but only with respect to the Consultant's services to be provided under the contract; C. Automobile Liability Insurance with a combined single limit, or the equivalent, or not less than $1,000,000.00 each accident for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for owned, hired or non -owned vehicles; and I7. Professional Liability insurance with a combined single limit of not less than $1,000,000.00 each claim, incident or occurrence. This is to cover damages caused by the error, omission, or negligent acts related to the professional services to be provided under this contract. The coverage must remain in effect for at least two (2) years after the contract is completed. There shall be no cancellation, material change, reduction of limits or intent not to renew the insurance coverage(s) without thirty (30) days written notice from the Consultant or its insurer(s) to the City. As evidence ofthe insurance coverages required by this contract, the Consultant shall furnish acceptable insurance certificates to the City at the time the Consultant returns the signed contract. The certificate shall specify all of the parties who are additional insureds, and will include applicable policy endorsements, the thirty (30) day cancellation clause, and the deduction or retention level. Insuring companies or entities are subject to City acceptance. If requested, complete copies of insurance policies shall be provided to the City. The Consultant shall be financially responsible for all pertinent deductibles, self- insured retentions, and /or self - insurance. 1 i . indemnification and Hold Harmless. MiG shall indemnify, defend and hold the City, its agents, officers or employees harmless from and against any and all claims, demands, liability, loss, cost, damage or expense of any nature whatsoever, including all costs and attorney fees, made against the City, its agents, officers or employees on account of injury, harm, death or damage to persons or property which is caused by, in whole or in part, the willfully tortuous or negligent acts or omissions of MIG or its agents, servants, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. Provided, however, such indemnification shall not extend to that portion of any claims, demands, liability, loss, cost, damage or expense of any nature whatsoever including all costs and attorney fees caused by the willfully tortuous or negligent acts or omissions of the City, its agents, employees, officers or contractors 12. Waiver. No officer, employee, agent or other individual acting on behalf of either party has the power, right or authority to waive any of the conditions or provisions of this agreement. No waiver in one instance shall be held to be waiver of any other subsequent breach or nonperformance. All remedies afforded in this agreement or by law, shall be taken and construed as cumulative, and in addition to every other remedy provided herein or by law. Failure of either party to enforce at any time any of the provisions of this agreement or to require at any time performance by the other party of any provision hereof shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of such provisions nor shall it affect the validity of this agreement or any part thereof. 13. Assignment and Delegation. Neither party shall assign, transfer or delegate any or all ofthe responsibilities of this agreement or the benefits received hereunder without first obtaining the written consent of the other party. Agreement for Professional Services Page 3 of 5 14. Subcontracts. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Consultant shall not enter into subcontracts for any of the work contemplated under this agreement without obtaining written approval ofthe City. 15. Confidentiality. Consultant may from time to time receive information which is deemed by the City to be confidential. Consultant shall not disclose such information without the express consent ofthe City or upon order of a Court of competent jurisdiction. 16. Jurisdiction and Venue. This Contract is entered into in Spokane County, Washington. Venue shall be in Spokane County, State of Washington. 17. Cost and Attorney's Fees. In the event a lawsuit is brought with respect to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be awarded its costs and attorney's fees in the amount to be determined by the Court as reasonable. Unless provided otherwise by statute, Consultant's attorney fees payable by the City shall not exceed the total sum amount paid under this agreement. 18. Entire Agreement. This written agreement constitutes the entire and complete agreement between the parties and supercedes any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement may not be changed, modified or altered except in writing signed by the parties hereto. 19. Anti- kickback. No officer or employee of the City, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in this Agreement, or have solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from any person with an interest in this Agreement. 20. Business Registration. Prior to commencement of work under this Agreement, Consultant shall register with the City as a business. 2004. IN WITNESS WE[EREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement this day of 21. Exhibits. Exhibits attached and incorporated into this agreement are: Exhibit A: Work Program Exhibit B: Compensation Schedule CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: Consultant: City Manager Owner Tax iD No. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Agreement for Professional Services Page 4 of 5 City Clerk City Attorney Agreement for Professional Services Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED WORK PROGRAM TASK 1 PROJECT INITITATION 1.1 Project Initiation /City Staff Meeting #1 The MIG Planning Team will meet with City staff to discuss contract administration, finalize the project scope, time schedule, budget, roles and responsibilities, end products, and public involvement strategies in order to tailor and refine the planning process. Based on this discussion, MIG will revise the project scope and schedule as needed. 1.2 Community Tour With the assistance of the park and recreation staff, maintenance representatives and other city officials, MIG will tour the community to observe the character of the city and take a cursory look at the park system. A detailed investigation of the park system will occur in Task 3. 1.3 Document Review MIG will collect and review relevant past reports that could provide important information to the planning study. 1.4 City Council Work Session (CC Meeting #1) The purpose of the first meeting is to: • Explain the purpose of the planning study and the planning process • Clarify roles and responsibilities • Finalize specific meeting times and dates • Explain the survey process and start developing the questionnaire Task 1 Products • Revised scope of work • Refined time schedule TASK 2 COMMUNITY PROFILE 2.1 Base Map Preparation Using mapping information provided by the City, MIG will prepare on AutoCAD or GIS base map of the planning area. This drawing will later be used to analyze the existing park system, assess park and facility needs, and develop a layout plan of future park areas. 2.2 Community Analysis MIG will analyze physical, economic and demographic characteristics of the community that may affect recreation interests, needs and participation. The MIG Team will study existing demographic information such as the 2000 Census, population forecasts, and other statistics. In addition, the Team will analyze the Community in terms of growth areas, natural recreation resources, land use patterns, political boundaries and other features. The MIG Team will present a summary of this information to the City and the Council as Discussion Paper #1. Page 1 2.3 Stakeholder Interviews MIG will work with the City to develop interview questions and to identify appropriate stakeholder groups. The City will conduct the interviews with stakeholder groups or individuals regarding the community understandings, priorities, issues and perceived needs. The City will then prepare a summary of findings.. Task 2 Products • Discussion Paper #1 (Community Profile) TASK 3 ANALYSIS OF THE PARK AREAS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS 3.1 Park Classification System After the tour of city facilities conducted in task 1.2, MIG will categorize them occording to a classification system developed by MIG. The purpose of classifying them is for assessing parkland needs, developing the overall park layout plan and comparing parkland standards with other communities. 3.2 Park Evaluation The City, with input and assistance from MIG, will tour each pork (including buildings if appropriate) managed by the City and evaluate them according to: • Condition, deficiencies and current operationol problems • Overall evaluation of the pork system including its strengths and weaknesses • Ratio of pork land by type and compared to other communities 3.3 Sports Facilities MIG will inventory and evaluate public and private sport facilities found in the community according to playing standards. Facilities evaluated will include sport fields, tennis courts, indoor focilities and swimming pools. 3.4 Recreation Program The City's recreation program will be evaluated by the MIG Team in terms of: • Types of programs offered • Registration levels • Cost impacts and revenue production • Overall subsidy rate for the program 3.5 Park Operations While it is understood that the County maintains the City's pork system, MIG will analyze current pork maintenance operations to determine the cost effectiveness of continuing with the same contract with the County, contracting out services to a private operator or whether the City should buy equipment and conduct its own maintenance. 3.6 Senior Center Operations MIG will review the current operations of the Senior Center and share with the staff, management approaches used at other senior centers around the Northwest. Recommendations will be made later in Tosk 7.7. Page 2 3.7 Cultural Arts MIG will review cultural arts opportunities at both the local and regional level. We will also shore with the staff how cultural art services are provided in other communities. Questions related to cultural arts will be addressed in the recreation survey that is conducted in Tosk 4.1. Recommendations on the role the City should take in cultural arts will occur in Task 5.1 and 7.8. 3.8 City Staff Meeting #2 The MIG Team will meet with City staff to review the findings of this part of the evaluation process. This information will be summarized into Discussion Paper #2. At this same meeting MIG and the City staff will review the first draft of a questionnaire and discuss the upcoming workshop meeting 3.9 City Council Work Session (CC Meeting #2) MIG will host a meeting with the Council to: • Review first draft of the questionnaire • Review Discussion Paper #2 (Analysis of the Pork System and Recreation Services) • Discuss the upcoming public workshop meeting Task 3 Products • first draft of the questionnaire • Discussion Paper #3 (Analysis of the Park System and recreation services) TASK 4 RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT The recreation needs assessment is an analysis of need for parkland, facilities and programs stated in quantifiable terms. This information will be collected from a number of sources including city staff, the City Council work session, a recreation survey, the workshop meeting, input from stakeholder groups, and o level of service the City believes it can afford. Need will be quantified for specific land areas and facilities and will be expressed as a standard or ratio to a population base. The standards will be formulated specifically for Spokane Volley and will be derived from mathematical models developed by MIG. Our approach to the needs assessment is described below. 4.1 The Recreation Survey MIG proposes a self - administered random household survey distributed to selected households in the community. Completed in the prescribed manner, an accurate sampling of opinions and participation levels con be made. We propose a sample size of 400 responses that will give you a 95% confidence level. Typically we hire o non- profit group seeking a fundraiser to distribute and pick up the questionnaires. The Council in Task 3.7 will review the first draft of the questionnaire. Subsequent review will be done at the staff level. Page 3 There are other survey approaches you may wish to consider such as a mailer sent out in the utility billings, o mass moiler sent to all households or a telephone survey. MIG has concluded all of these types but over time we have found the method described above provides us more accurate information, permits us to ask more difficult questions and allows the client to see the actual results. Some of the information that can be expected to be collected are: • Population profile information • Attitudes and opinions related to services • Park and facility needs • Information on current recreation participation compared to the MIG AVERAGE, which is the average participation levels for the last 15 communities surveyed. • Analysis by geographical areas of the community • Measure of support for funding facilities and programs • Perceived need for specialized facilities such as sport fields, indoor recreation space and aquatic facilities. 4.2 The Swimming Pool Study MIG will incorporate questions related to the swimming pool study in with the overall recreation survey. 4.3. Public Visioning Workshop (City Meeting #3) With input from the City, MIG will organize and facilitate a public workshop meeting to involve community members of all ages and backgrounds in developing a vision for future park and recreation services. The City will determine the appropriate location and time for the meeting that will facilitate the attendance of the greatest number of residents. MIG will develop flyers and other publicity materials, which the City will distribute. City staff, the City Council and local stakeholders will be encouraged to attend this meeting. Some of the information expected to be developed in this meeting include: • Perceived recreation needs • Recreation issues • Suggested park facilities • Funding preferences 4.4 Sports Group Survey MIG will contact the organized sport groups through a survey and /or personal contact to obtain specific information about the needs of organized sports. Information collected will include the number of teams, frequency of play and practice, fields used, season of play, etc. The MIG Team will use this data to identify desired service levels for sport facilities and subsequently develop demand standards for facility needs. 4.5 Identification of Park and Facility Needs Based on informotion derived from the survey, the public workshop, the sports group survey, input from City staff, and mathematical models previously developed by MIG, the MIG Team will develop demand standards specific to Spokane Volley. These standards will be expressed in terms of a ratio of acres or facilities per 1,000 people. The recommended standard (often referred to as the Level of Service) will then be used to compare with the existing supply to identify existing and future needs in terms of acres, miles or number of facilities. The Needs Report (Discussion Paper #3) will include: • A discussion on notional recreation trends • A comparison of land /facilities with other cities • Results of the survey • Input data from public workshop meeting • Input from special interest groups • A collection of the raw survey tables Page 4 • A description of how each demand model was developed and what it means in terms of additional land or facilities • An assessment of need for parkland, recreation facilities and recreation programs 4.6 City Council Work Session (CC Meeting #3) MIG will present the results of the survey and the Needs Assessment Report to the City Council in a workshop. Task 4 Products • Raw survey tables • Discussion Paper #3 (Needs Assessment) TASK 5 ISSUES AND SERVICE LEVELS 5.1 Current Service Providers MIG will prepare a current service matrix that identifies and evaluates park and recreation services and facilities, cultural arts, senior services and other related services now offered by the City or other agencies in the community. The purpose of this task will be to identify where voids and overlaps exist. This information will be used to establish the city's role in providing park and recreation, cultural arts and senior services. 5.2 Issue Papers Based on the information derived to dote, MIG will prepare a series of issue papers that highlight special needs and problems that should be discussed in the Plan. Resolution of these issues will form the basic framework of the Plan. 5.3 Service Level Standards MIG will calculate current standards and recommended service level standards for parkland and recreation facilities. This information can later be used for developing pork impact fees. 5.4 Alternative Park Systems MIG will present and discuss alternative forms of developing a comprehensive pork system. This analysis will compare convenience of facilities with the cost of developing and maintaining the system. 5.5 City Council Work Session (CC Meeting #4) MIG will meet with the City Council to discuss the roles and responsibilities the city should assume and resolve the issue papers. This may take more than one meeting. 5.6 Brainstorming Session (City Meeting #4) MIG will host a holf -doy brainstorming session with key city staff people to discuss potential recommendations and policies in the Plan. Task 5 Products • Current services rnatrix • Issue Papers • Broinstorming session Page 5 Add Alternate TASK 6 AQUATIC FEASIBILITY STUDY Note: The following is an outline of the scope of work for the Aquatic Feasibility Study. The detailed scope of work is found at the end of this section. 6.1 Aquatic Needs Assessment At the kick -off meetings in Task 1, MIG and ORB will meet with the staff, City Council and key stakeholders to review the overall goals and objectives of the swimming pool project. 6.2 Evaluation of Existing Pools ORB's pool specialists will make a field investigation of the three existing outdoor pools to determine their operating conditions and determine their compliance with current codes. 6.3 Public Assessment At the first workshop meeting held in Task 4.3, MIG and ORB will host o session devoted exdusively to aquatic needs. The format of this meeting will be determined later with the City staff. It could be either two separate meetings held at the some time at the some place, two meetings at different times of the day or one meeting to incorporate all of the pork and aquatic issues. 6.4 Market Analysis and Program Development Based on the public assessment, input from stakeholders and our own market analysis, MIG /ORB will identify the potential market demand for various types of aquatic facilities. From this analysis we will develop o design program that identifies the recommended activity spaces, their sizes and overoll site requirements. We will also look of potential development and management options. 6.5 Site Location Analysis With assistance from City skiff, MIG /ORB will identify and evaluate up to five si-vs for an aquatic facility. This is ar: additive alternate in the scope of work. 6.6 Facility Concept Design MIG /ORB will prepare up to three conceptual design drawings for an aquatic complex. Discussion Paper #4 will summarize the findings of the needs assessment, description of the design program, description of the three alternatives and their potential construction /operating cost and a discussion of possible finonce and operating options available to the community. 6.7 City Council Work Session (CC Meeting #5) MIG and ORB will meet with the CC to review the concept drawings and the findings in Discussion Paper #4. 6.8 Public Meeting (City Meeting #5) MIG /ORB will host a public meeting to present the findings described in Task 6.7 above. 6.9 Potential Construction and Operating Cost Based on the input and decisions mode in tasks 6.7 and 6.8, ORB will prepare a cost impact analysis. This will include: • Site acquisition cost • Site development cost • Pool design and construction cost • Facility operating pro forma (includes revenue and operating expense projections Page 6 Task 6 Products • Floor plan of selected concept • Site plan • Capital cost estimate • Pro forma operating analysis TASK 7 RECOMMENDATIONS AND POLICIES 7.1 Design and Development Standards MIG will prepare design and development standards for each type of park, trail system or open space area proposed in the city's park system. 7.2 Layout Plan MIG will prepare a park and facility layout plan that illustrates the general location of future park sites, trail systems, open space areas and other facilities. 7.3 New Major Facilities MIG will analyze the need for major new facilities such as an indoor recreation center, sports field complex or other specialized facility. The need for aquatic facilities will be discussed in Task 6. 7.4 Trails Plan MIG will develop a recreational trail plan for the community including guidelines for design and development. 7.5 Recommendations to the Existing Park System MIG will recommend changes, additions or improvements needed to existing parks and will provide associated cost for each. 7.6 Recreation Program Services Based on the information derived from the analysis of the current recreation progroms (Task 3.4), the survey results, and other sources, MIG will recommend changes and additions to the current recreation program conducted by the City and also recommend where partnerships might be a viable option. 7 7 Senior Center Operations MIG will recommend additions or c h.^..nges to the c senior service program and review the warkin, relationship between the City ant the Senior '"F.hter Assorntion. TI; as is not currently included in MIG work program. 7.8 Cultural Arts MIG will recommend the role that the City should assume in cultural arts and any physical improvements that should be included in the Capitol Facilities Plan. 7.9 Maintenance Operations Based on the Analysis made in Task 3.5, MIG will recommend the best way to maintain parks and facilities in Spokane Valley. We will also look at other approaches such as: • Adopt -a -park programs • Use of alternative community service programs • Use of volunteers • Use of multi - handicap training programs Page 7 7.10 City Council Work Session (CC meeting #6) MIG will prepare a summary of recommendations and review with the City Council Tosk 7 Products • Park design and development standards • Outline of recommendations and policies • Park and Facility Layout Plan • Trails Plan • Analysis of needed major facilities • Recommendations to the senior services program • Recommendations on maintenance operations • Summary report of recommendations TASK 8 ACTION PLAN 8.1 List of Capital Projects MIG will list all capital projects and actions recommended in the Plan and the aquatic facility and prioritize them according to the criteria established in Task 8.2. 8.2 Criteria for Prioritizing Projects At an earlier meeting with the City Council, MIG will develop a list of criteria that can be applied for prioritizing capital projects and other actions. These criteria will be used to develop the Capital Facilities Plan in Task 8.5. 8.3 Funding Options MIG will identify and evaluate various funding options the City has for capitol development. 8.4 Feasibility of Tax Supported Projects Based on the findings of the Needs Assessment, input from the public meetings and staff discussions, MIG will evaluate the feasibility of a tax supported funding mechanism to finance major construction projects. 8.5 Funding Strategy Based on the number of projects listed in Task 8.1, the funding options available to the City identified in Tosk 8.3 and the feasibility of a bond measure developed in Task 8.4, MIG will prepare an overall funding strategy for capital improvements. This could include multi - funding sources such as a bond measure, impact fees, grants, public facility district, Real Estate Excise Tax (REET), special state and local budget allocations and partnerships. 8.6 Capital Improvement Plan A short-term 6 year capital improvement plan will be developed listing projects in their priority, their cost and funding source. 8.7 Maintenance Requirements MIG will forecast future maintenance requirements when new facilities are developed according to the Plan. Task 8 Products • Criteria for prioritizing protects • List of funding sources • Capital Improvement Plan Page 8 TASK 9 ADOPTION AND DOCUMENTATION 9.1 Draft Master Plan MIG will prepare draft report of the entire Parks and Recreation Master Plan and send one reproducible copy to the City for reproduction and distribution. 9.2 City Council Work Session (CC Meeting #7) MIG will review the draft report including the swimming pool study with the City Council and revise the documents as needed. 9.3 Public Review Meeting (City Meeting #6) MIG will present the Plan to the public and revise the Plan as needed. 9.4 City Council Work Session {City Meeting #8) MIG will present the Plan to the City Council in a work session. •Psis task is not currently included in MIG work program. 9.5 City Council Public Hearing lCity Meeting #9) MIG will :resent the Plan fo the City Council in a public hearing. This task is not currently included in MIG work program. 9.6 Final Master Plan Making revisions based on input from the City staff, the public meeting and the City Council, MIG will finalize the Master Plan. Final documents will include: • 20 copies of the final plan and one CD containing an electronic PDF file. The Final Master Plan will include maps and text that provides the following information: ❑ Description of the planning process ❑ Summary of the community profile information ❑ Assessment of parks and programs offered ❑ Park and facility needs assessment ❑ Park design standards ❑ Results of the swimming pool study ❑ Recommendations and policies ❑ Implementing and funding recommendations • One full -sized and one reduced version colored copy of the Existing Parks and Facilities Mop, the Park Layout Plan and the swimming pool drawings • A CD of all reports and drawings Page 9 Spokane Valley Parks, Trails and Recreation Master Plan r ooBS Jo oa f uoueo4y uv u[w uaana1 uagpoo act clpuo-1 uo( 8210 iogo, fowl castracbg h Maur*j Ming Rana 1. PROJECT INITIATION $125 395 585 365 355 3102 1.1 Proiect Minor= Icily staff meeting #1) 12 12 12 16 54,240 51,140 8500 54 7, 40 51 140 1.2 Community lour 1.3 Dacumen/ review 4 4 5780 5780 1.4 Mect (CC Meeting # 1) 12 51,140 5500 51440 Miscellaneous aril Administration 2 5110 5110 Subtotal 12 40 0 0 2 20 57,410 51,000 58,410 2. ANALYSIS OF PLANNING ARM 2.1 Bose map preparation 6 5390 550 5440 2.2 Community analysis 2 4 20 81,930 51,930 2.3 Stakehohfcr intesriaws i 585 585 Miscellaneous and Administration 2 5110 S50 5160 Subtotal 2 4 1 26 2 0 52,515 5100 52,615 3. PARK AND FACIUTY ANALYSIS 3.1 Park lose tcation system 2 $190 5190 3.2 Park evaluation 4 4 5640 5640 3.3 Sport facilities 2 2 5320 5320 3.4 Recreation ptql.rorn 1 2 4 8 2 5805 5760 5805 5760 3.5 Pork operations 3.6 Se nior center operaliom 4 5500 5500 3.7 Cultural arts 2 3170 5170 3.8 C•ty staff meeting #2 12 51,140 5300 81,440 3.9 Meeting (CC meeting #21 (inducted in Task 3.81 2 SO 5 110 550 SO 5160 Micoallancaus and Administration Subtotal 7 24 10 8 2 0 54,635 5350 54,985 4. RECREATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT 4.1 The recreation suney 8 8 16 80 57,200 5125 51,530 3725 51,200 5500 58,400 8125 52 0 30 5725 4.2 Swimming pool study quangons 1 2 I 12 4 8 2 4.3 Public visioning warlehop (city nag. #3) 4.4 Sports group survey 4.5 Identification of park and facility needs 4 24 217 54,080 51,140 5110 5300 550 54,080 51,440 5160 4.6 Meeting (CC Meeting #3) Recreation Needs Assessment 12 2 Miscellaneous and Administration Svsa`o1al 15 45 12 48 84 0 514,910 52,050 816,960 5. ISSUES & SERVICE LEVELS 5.1 Currant service providers 8 5680 8680 5.2 Issue papers 2 4 4 $890 5890 5.3 Service Level standards 2 8 51,010 51,010 5380 5.4 Ahemntivo park systems 4 1380 5.5 Meeting (CC Meeting/ If Issues 12 51,140 SO 5300 51 SO 5.6 Brainstorming session (city mtg. *4) (included in Task 5.5) Miscellaneous and Administration 2 5110 5100 5210 Subtotal 4 28 8 4 2 0 34,210 8400 54,610 6. AQUATIC FEASIBILITY STUDY 6.1 Aquatic mods °me neat 8 3 51 285 51,285 6.2 Ewluc5on of existing pools 2 2 4 36 20 S4 110 52,250 54,110 52,250 6.3 Publc assessment 6.4 Maaket analysis and program developrrsent 4 4 12 2 12 32 52 53,700 SO 55 890 S 1 500 51 020 5300 5300 83,700 SO 85,890 51,800 81,320 6.5 Site location analysis (NIC) 6.6 Fatility concept design 6.7 Msrtinp (CC Meeting #5) Aquo&c Study 6.8 Pubk marring (city n eesdn0 #5] 6.9 Potential constzudion and o�ereli tg co* 2 2 20 52 440 52,440 Miscellaneous and Administration 2 3110 350 5160 Subtotal 34 7 12 4 2 160 522,305 5650 522,955 EXHIBIT B PROPOSED FEE SCHEDULE Pope 1 7. RECOMMENDATIONS AND POLICIES 7.1 Design and devefoprment standards 4 1380 3380 7.2? Layout plan 4 4 3640 3640 7.3 New major Facaties 2 2 3440 5440 7.4 Trails plan 2 2 5320 5320 7.5 Recommendations to adsUN:Lac rk system 12 4 S 1 140 $340 30 3 1,140 3340 50 7.6 Recroati n program smites 7.7 Senior canter .. afiors 7.8 Cultural arts 4 5340 1340 7.9 Maintenance operations 4 _ 3380 5380 7,10 Mactinn 06 jCC Meeting *6) Summary of recommendations 12 2 51,140 3110 5300 350 51,440 3160 Miscellaneous and Administration Subsotal 2 40 8 6 2 0 $5,230 3350 35,580 8. ACTION PIAN 13.1 List of capital projects 4 2 _ 4 5640 1190 1640 3190 B.2 Criteria for •r'oritizin • •'c 8.3 fvndi a o • " ens 2 4 3630 3630 8.4 Feasibility of fox supported projects 4 1 4 5500 1505 5500 3505 8.5 Funding slrategry 8.6 Capitol lmprovernenl pion 12 4 ' 51 400 31 400 8.7 Maintcmncer »•uiremcrds 4 5380 $380 Miscallonoons and Administration 2 5110 350 5160 Subtotal 7 30 0 8 2 0 54,355 150 34,405 9. ADOPTION AND DOCUMENTATION 9.1 Draft master plan 8 24 12 12 24 8 4 S6 060 31 140 51,140 1300 5300 36,060 31,440 51,440 9.2 Marking (CC M 47) 9.3 Public review meeting Icily mtp. *6) 9.4 City council work session (air mtp. 87) (NIC) 10 10 9.5 City couno7 public herring lolly rrtig. #8) (MC) 50 SO 9.6 Final master plan 4 16 8 32,540 51,000 13,540 Miscellaneous and Administration 2 3110 5150 5260 Subtotal 12 64 24 16 6 0 510,990 $1,750 112,740 GRAND TOTAL 951 282 75 120 104 180 376,560 36,700 583,260 rnC-Nen ho14.1 Additive Alternates 6. AQUATIC FEAS1111UTY STUDY 6.5 Srite location analysis GRAND TOTAL with Allernate 8 8 111 13,500 33,500 $86,760 Poen 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Valley Corridor Environmental Assessment GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the joint City Council /Planning Commission meeting on 2/23/2004 Public Works staff presented five options for completing the couplet project. After discussing each option and based on a suggestion from one Councilmember a sixth option (2A) was added. The options were as follows: Opt 1. Transition existing Appleway back to Sprague (2 -way) east of University Opt 2. Extend existing Couplet (Appleway eastbound, Sprague westbound) to Sullivan Opt 3. Extend Appleway 2 -way east of University, leave Sprague 2 -way Opt 4. Return Sprague to2 -way, change /extend Appleway to 2 -way with limited access Opt 5. Extend Appleway 1 -way east to Sullivan, existing couplet and Sprague as -is Opt 2A Extend Appleway 1 -way east to Sullivan, Sprague 1 -way west w/ frontage road east At the meeting it was recommended to study options 2, option 5 and option 2A. At the April 6, 2004 the Public Works Department presented several concems and engineering challenges associated with option 2A. The City Council decided at that meeting to drop option 2A from further consideration. BACKGROUND: The City has received significant public comment on the proposed options. There is overall strong public support for proceeding with a Valley Corridor project. Staff has met with SRTC and the Federal Highway Administration to discuss proceeding with analysis of the project. Based on those meeting we have requested a scope of works and cost proposal from Jones & Stokes, the consultant who developed the draft Environmental Assessment for Spokane County. Their is attached for your review. OPTIONS: Proceed with recommended Environmental Assessment (EA). Eliminate the EA work. Seek an alternate method or provider to derive the data. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Proceed with completing the Environmental Assessment with the consultant, Jones & Stokes. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Jones & Stokes est. - $143,007 • Remaining Grant Funds - $43,170 • SRTC Additional Funds $40,250 • TIB Funds needed - $40,250 • City match needed - $19,337 STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten ATTACHMENT: Presentation, Jones and Stokes proposal EXHIBIT A CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Valley Corridor Environmental Assessment Draft Scope of Work Jones and Stokes Associates (Consultant), under the direction of the City of Spokane Valley (City), will revise, update and complete the City's Environmental Assessment (I:.A) for the Valley Corridor, referenced in previous documents as the Valley Couplet. The EA will be consistent with the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) NEPA procedures and rules. The Consultant will provide professional planning services for the completion of the Valley Corridor EA as outlined below. Task 1: PROJECT INITIATION and MANAGEMENT Task L1. Project Start Up and Contract Documents In consultation with City staff, finalize the scope of work, project: budget; project: schedule and execute contract documents. The Consultant will provide monthly invoices, updates on the status of the project, percent complete and supporting documentation as requested by the City of Spokane Valley. .Additionally, the Consultant will provide copies of the D.raft EA to FHWA and WSDOT to utilize as a reference document to the new :EA. that will be completed for this contract. Task 1.2 Review and Collection of New Documentation and Studies City staff, in coordination with the Consultant team, will assemble and provide recent plans, newly adopted City documents and studies that will be the basis of updates in the E.A. The Consultant will maintain the data collected as a resource for use by the project team. Information to be provided includes, but is not limited to: A. Current City Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Codes. Specifically, if there have been amendments or changes to the interim Comprehensive Plan or. Zoning Code. (Including newly created City maps, related plans, studies, staff reports, etc); B. Inventory of applicable GIS files and maps, AutoCAD maps, and /or other city maps available in digital format; C. Drainage or surface water management plans; 11). Current land use inventory information and a summary of land use and building permit activity levels; E. City Environ. mental documents utilized in conjunction with prior significant project and non - project actions; Spokane Valley Valley Corridor EA Draft Scope of Work May 23, 2004 4�i Fl Jones & Stokes Page 1 of 7 F. Special district plans, community surveys or similar information; G. Any documentation on public process and community input from recent surveys and meetings relating to the prior Couplet review process; H. State and Federal resource agency plans, maps and related studies; and I.. Current TModel files from SRTC. Task 1.3 EA Assessment - Identification of Updating or New Sections Based on prior review and review of the new background information, the Consultant will prepare the following memorandum: .A. A new Purpose and Need Statement; B. An assessment of the draft E.A document that identifies elements that require updates, sections that are affected by new information, and opportunities to clarify the purpose and need statement; and C. Identifies key issues, areas of iunpacts, and potential. range of mitigations. This memorandum will be provided to the City to utilize for their records and to use for discussion purposes during the Kick Off meeting with WSDOT and FHWA (Task 1.4). Task 1.4 Intergovernmental Coordination The Consultant will participate in up to four (4) coordination meetings with the City, Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC), WSDOT, and FHWA for discussion and review of the EA format, findings, and conclusion. These meetings will facilitate the review and the approval of the EA by WSDOT and FHWA. The first meeting will be a FHWA /WSDOT Kick -Off Meeting, with the objective of negotiating an agency - review time line and identification of cooperating agencies for early involvement and analysis review. Task 1.5 EA Scoping Notice and Workshop A new scoping notice will be prepared for review and approval. The Scoping notice, through coordination with City staff and F1-IWA staff, will be published in the local paper and the federal register,. The consultant will provide a summary of past comments of record, review of the EA process, the EA. elements, range of alternatives and conduct a scoping hearing. Based on the scopi.ng hearing, a sun of the comments will be generated based on past public comments and additional continents provided by the County staff, City staff and participating agencies. The summary of comments and significant environmental issues identified will be integrated into the EA. The EA assessment memorandum, generated in Task 1.3, may be revised or updated based on the results from the Scoping Process. Task 1 Work Products: A. Overall Project scope of work, budget, and schedules; B. EA Assessment memorandum; Spokane Valley Valley Corridor EA Draft Scope of Work May 23. 2004 4 Jones & Stokes Page 2 of 7 C. NEPA Scoping Notice and Determination of Significance; and D. Coordination with agencies and tribes on intergovernmental participation. City Subtasks: A. Review, comments, and approval on project scope, budget, and schedule; 13. Compile and provide all relevant background data; C. Coordinate with SRTC, WSDOT and FI-1WA on intergovernmental review; and D. The City will be responsible for all community meeting logistics, including noticing, reserving meeting space, etc. This task has four. objectives: 1) Redefine the Alternatives; 2) Incorporate new information into EA; 3) Generate new sections as needed; and 4) Provide an updated, accurate, factual Draft EA for the City, WSDOT and FI- WA staff review. The initial draft of the EA included the standard range of natural and built resources; however, several resources potentially could be adversely impacted by the proposed action. Therefore, beyond the standard resources (soils, stream, water quality, wildlife, etc.), NEPA. rules require an in -depth analysis of the resources that could be potentially impacted. The EA will focus on updating or generating new analysis of the key resources listed below. Task 2.1 Land Use The Consultant, in coordination with City staff, will confirm the existing and projected land use designations in the City of Spokane Valley and along the corridor alignment alternatives. The location, proximity, and overall effects of the alignment alternatives will determine the level of impacts to the land use. The land use information will be utilized in the Transportation Modeling tasks (2.2). Task 2.2 Transportation The Consultant, in coordination with the City staff, will revise and update the current Transportation Element based on the 'Model provided by SRTC. The analysis will include: existing conditions, traffic forecast, future conditions based on 4 alternatives scenarios, Level of Service (LOS) analysis at sixteen (16) intersections and the average daily traffic d»ring PM peak hours. Task 2.3 Air Quality The Consultant, in coordination with City staff, will review the updated transportation modeling results and revise the Air Quality section of the EA. Spokane Valley Valley Corridor EA Draft Scope of Work May 23. 2004 Task 2: Draft Environmental Assessment Jones & Stokes Page 3 of 7 Task 2.4 Noise The Consultant, in coordination with City staff, will review the updated transportation modeling results and revise the Noise section of the EA. Field investigations and new baseline noise monitor, wall analysis, and a complete Noise Discipline Report will be required. This level of effort is required due to the proximity of sensitive noise receptors (apartrent(s) and single family homes). Task 2.5 Economic Development The Consultant, in coordination with City staff and the City's Economic Consultant, will summarize and integrate the Findings of the \Talley Couplet Economic soon to be underway. Task 2.6 Historic and Cultural Resources The Consultant, in coordination with City staff, will review existing records and determine if prior survey results and findings are sufficient. Additionally, a search of the State and Local databases will be conducted to update the assessment of any historic or cultural resources that may be in the corridor alignment. Task 2.7 Socio - economics The Consultant, in coordination with City staff, will create a socio-economic section that is a combination of land use, census data, and community make -up along the corridor, alignment. This section will identify potential impacts to the community from a racial, income, or overall socioeconomic situation. Task 2.8 Indirect and Cumulative Effects The Consultant will prepare indirect and cumulative effect sections of the EA, based on an analysis of the various resources. This section will document the overall indirect and cumulative effects the project may have on the cormmnunity in association with other, relevant projects. Task 2.9 Conclusions The Consultant will prepare a general conclusion section on the potential range of substantial or adverse impacts that can or cannot be mitigated within the context of the project. Spokane Valley Valley Corridor EA Droll Scope of Work May 23, 2004 w�S n Jones & Stokes Page 4 of 7 Task 3 Environmental Assessment Production Task 3.1 Compile Administrative Draft EA The consultant will prepare an administrative EA that is consistent with WSDOT, FHWA, and NEPA procedures. The EA will include the applicable sections pursuant to NEPA, the Purpose and Need statement and public comments. Task 4 Agency and Public Review Task 4.1 Revisions based on City Review of Administrative Draft EA The Consultant will provide an administrative draft of the EA to the City for their review and editorial approval. The City will provide written comments to the Consultant concerning revisions and comments. The Consultant will revise and update the EA, based on City comments and prepare an agency administrative Draft EA. One round of review is assumed. Task 4.2 Revisions based on Agencies Review of Administrative Draft EA (SRTC, WSDOT, & FHWA) The Consultant will provide an agency administrative draft to the City for submittal to WSDOT, SRTC and FHWA. WSDOT local programs (Eastern Region and Olympia) will coordinate the agency review with SRTC and FHWA. WSDOT will return written comments to the Consultant in regards to revisions and convnents. The Consultant will revise and update the EA, based on the agency comments, and prepare a Draft EA for publication and public review. One round of review is assumed. Task 4.3 Editorial and QA /QC Review The Consultant will finalize the Draft EA and provide a camera -ready copy to the City. The Consultant will coordinate with the City and FHWA on the notice of availability of the EA in the Federal Register. The local notification process will be pursuant to the City's public notification process. Task 4.4 Notice of Availability The consultant will coordinate with WSDOT and FHWA. on the draft Notice of Availability (NOA). The NOA will he published in the Federal. Register, through FHWA's process. Spokane Vallee Valley Corridor DA Droll Scope of Work May 23, 2004 Jones & Stokes Pages of 7 Task 4.5 Public Hearing During the public comment period, one (1) workshop will be held, in conjunction with a City Council Meeting. The objective of the workshop will be to present the Draft EA to the citizens and stakeholders. A presentation will cover the key elements of the EA, range of alternatives and the NiEPA -1`A. process. Following the presentation, a public comment session will be conducted. City staff and consultants will be available for one -on -one discussion with citizens and stakeholders to obtain additional comments. Task 4.6 City and Agency Comment Response Matrix The consultant will prepare a matrix of the comments received in writing and at the workshop. The matrix will be provided to the City, WSDOT, and FHWA for review, and to provide a basis of discussion for the Finding of No Significance Impact ( FONSI) statement. It is assutned that the number of comments would not exceed 30. If the comments raise an issue that has not been addressed in the EA, the Consultant, City staff, WSDOT, and FHWA will review to determine the level of response needed in the PONS'. Task 4 Work Products: A. Administrative EA for. City and agency review; B. Draft EA for publication and public review; C. Draft Notice of Availability; D. One (1) Workshops; and E. Publicf Agency Comment Response Matrix. City Subtasks: A. Review and provide comments on administrative Draft EA; B. Prepare copies of camera -ready EA for public distribution; C. Coordination on the Issuance of Notice of Availability for EA; and D. Arrange workshop date and location. Task 5.1 Draft Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Based on public comments received on the draft document, during the public comment period, the Consultant will generate a draft FONSI that documents the findings of the EA, the public comments, and the mitigation measures that will be dements of the project. Spokane Valley Valley Corridor EA Draft Scope of Work May 23, 2004 Task 5: Issuance of FONSI and adoption of EA for SEPA Jones & Stokes Page 6 of 7 Task 5.2 Coordination of FONSI based on City and Agency Review The consultant will coordinate with the City staff, WSI)OT, and FHWA on the FONSI staternent. This will include review of the draft FONSI, revisions, and final copy for the FHWA publication of the FONSI in the Federal Register. Task 5.3 Adoption of EA for SEPA The City will issue a notice of a Public SEPA Hearing, at which time the City Council can adopt the approved EA through a Notice of Action. The notification process will be pursuant to the City's public notification process. The Consultant will attend the meeting to provide support to City Staff. Task 5.4 Final Copy of EA The Consultant will provide City Staff with an electronic copy (format to be determined) and a hard copy of the final EA and FONSI. As noted under Task 3, the City is responsible for. preparation of final maps and graphics. Task 5 Work Products: • Draft Adoption Ordinance • Findings of Fact • Final EA and FONSI . City Subtasks: • The County is responsible for all final document(s) production. Overall Scope Assumptions A. The consultant retains the right and flexibility to shift hours between tasks to ensure efficiencies. B. The budget assumes that there will be no changes to the alternatives between the Draft and Final EA. C. Spokane Valley will be responsible for providing base maps and existing graphics related to corridor alignment, natural resources, land use, utilities, housing, transportation, and maps as needed for use in the EA. 0. Spokane. Valley will be responsible for the printing and distribution of the draft and final editions of the EA document(s). E. Spokane Valley will be responsible for all community meeting logistics, including noticing, and reserving meeting space. Spokane Valley Valley Corridor EA Draft Scope of Work May 23. 2004 Jones & Stokes Page 7 of 7 Spokane Valley Corridor - Project Current Status & History • Draft Environmental Assessment by the County, May 17, 2002. • Brainstorming meeting with Spokane County, STA, SRTC,:Spokane Valley on Dec. 5, 2003. : • Council /Planning Commission mtg. on Jan.. 15. ..... . Current Status &: History (cont.) • The City requested SRTC to model traffic-for the Couplet on Feb. 10, 2004. -• - Coundl %Planning Commission mtg. -on -- ' - Feb.; — - - - - - - -- -- • City Council Public Hearing on option 2A on April 6. five , NtIVOl 1 Current Status & History.(cont.) • Joint meeting on May 25, 2004 with SRTC and the Federal Highway Administration to discuss proceeding with Environmental Assessment (EA) • SRTC Board approved funding 50% of work to complete the EA on June 10, 2004.' _ ....... - -• TIB may fund remaining 50% to complete the EA. .. _ _ . Public Participation' • Community Preference Survey in April, 2004 • Comprehensive Plan Meetings: • o March 3, 2004 o April 2.1, 2004 . . o May 12, 2004 . oJune 2, 2004 • - •6June17,2004 - - owe ueo.k: 2 • Comp Plan Mtg. 3/25/04.. • Orme et dtsagro2 101 54 5preguerioblerray eouplat hat been ti sum:olive vay.10 sou be elite Ap*way sectesn ef the coed belrg . disagree 7 agree nor disagree 1 D. Somewhat dtsagree 2 E, Strongly uSall imprearrent to tre evetall roadway system in Spokane Wr.ula . NIU say A. Strongly ogreo 35 B. Somewhat agree 10 C. Neither eor...necri enst Univemq Pt.n.17 WO& You say Ku— & Strongly support 34 B Somewhat support 1.2 C. Neither support nor oppose 4 D. Somewhat oppose 1 E Strongty • opurrie 9 stioportiii yidivz War Inn 6iiski being C463dcd oast to - - • Evergreen isulf. TrI15 etc4N1 mut in Stuogue changeg to a one way cam a university.. wood .1"..1 say .4. Strong1Y SolltoOrt 28 E. Somewhat support 9 C. Neither . support nor oppose S D. Somewhat oppose 2 5. Strongly oppose 11 • • • • - . . • . . 11 - 'Aga Wel'es '. • • frIlle-Nt Comp Plan Mtg. 4/21/04 . . • • . . . . .. .. .. ... . DO yoJ agree a dsacree that the 5p2gueMopleway couplet has been a useful Itoolowineot to the oven) ri-adv.ey systeminSpaione voter? Weuld re sat you... A. Strongly agree IS 9. Somewhat agree 4 C. Neither agree nor disagree 5 D. Sernmeat disagree 2 E, Strongly dsagree 4 fie*, stavereve r amie rstr be et de appermy neto of the �.�c1 Xing 7x.r.o.d..,...,,......,,,,,, Woeki you toy 4. Soon* support 15 B. Somewhat support 5 C. Neither support nor op;ooso 4 D. Somewhat oppose 2 E. Strongly oppose 3 . How suoporthe woad you be of ire couplet being et terYJed east to . E‘e.preen Rood?. Ths ■v:iid resat in Sprague Mengng ho a unc Wt cost of Lour. %%WO Wu =It You • • • - - A.'.5trongly support .1.3. 8.50mo:what meow/ 5 C.' Netther support nor °otiose .2 D. Somewhat oppeoe 5 I P.3.1 I Pala We*, I 1 'en.t104 . Community Preference Survey: Level of Agreement that Scrag uebripplevray Couplet Nod Been Useful Improvement to Overall Roadway System (Q090) 1 nay • Shoat Sorneettul Neutral Setatewttat !I•am• *ow- nrso I pieta akvi.e 3 Community Preference Survey: Return Sprague Avr.nue, from University Road to Interstate 90, to Two•Way Traffic (Q095) . . 1D 1 • ,Nbk Won. 1 •cemros I • • • • - • 1- • • • Community Preference Sunrey: SuppOrt/ Opposition to Appleway Section of Couplet Being Extended East (Q100) 1 00% 80% n- 1 60% 49% 4O% 2,06_ 21% 0% Spongy Iloutrel Strom!, Came* OPPoot SLCIXXI V..1 11110/124 „ . . . - Community Preference Survey: Support/OpposItion to Couplet Being Extended East to Evergreen Road (Q101) • • • 100% I • n=393 34% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% • 21% 14% Wang* 80411•Mut Word Somo.1110 Mranuty Copn• cIIP.P. 14:0411 P9. 12- 1 1" • featOkeVa ' t ailf7T 4 Work to be done... • Council will approve the 6-year Transportation Improvement Plan by the end of June. • Through our current Engineering Services Contract-with Spokane County, we will aUthbriielcirie. Stokes to oomplete the EA. - .. . . Work to be done.. (cont.) . . • Community Development Department is conducting an economic analysis of the Corridor which will be included in the EA. • The City will request the project be included in the Metropolitan Transportation Plan which will allow access to Federal Funds. - - - - - - - - - - - - -•- .. - - — - , • • - - Ntpe • Palc1 1-1 1:01n.AA • Work to be done.. ; (cont.) • The.EA is scheduled_to be completed by November, 2004. • • The,City Council will make the final__ - - - determination on the project. - - Pc.'19' • 1 1 . 5 Work to be done... (cont.) • The City will inform TIB by December, 2004 if we wish to proceed with the project. • The City will still need to secure , - - -- Federal Funding to- fully -fund the-- - project. I Nue16 t EA :Funding Janes & Stokes est. • $143,007 • Remaining Grant Funds - $43,170 • SRTC Additional Funds - $40,250 • 118 Funds needed -• $40,250 • City match needed t $19,337, 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Business registration program discussion GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Ordinance 34 adopted a business registration system for the City of Spokane Valley in March of 2003. BACKGROUND: The City engaged Microflex to identify and register businesses operating within our city limits. There are 2900+ registered businesses within the database built by Microflex. While we still have work to do to identify businesses operating within our city limits, we need to begin planning for the first renewal of registrations, which will take place late this year, and the registration of new 2004 businesses. At the June 1, council meeting, the city council tentatively decided to use the Washington State Department of Licensing (DOL) to register and renew city licenses and to include nonprofits at a reduced fee. There was also discussion regarding the advisability of recovering 2003 costs which some believed the city had planned to absorb. The estimated revenues and expenditures have been revised (attached) to reflect 2004 costs only, and a reduced proposed city fee of $13 /year. The state's fee would remain at $9 /year. A $3 /year nonprofit fee is suggested as well. RECOMMENDED ACTION: A motion to direct staff to prepare an amendment to the existing business registration ordinance is recommended. The amendment would include the recommended fees, the inclusion of nonprofit organizations and use of the Washington State Department of Licensing system for joint registration. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Ongoing city costs to register businesses in 2005, and recovery of costs spent in 2004, are expected to total about $29,000 each year. A city business registration fee of $13 /year will pay for these costs. A financial review would be scheduled for 2007 with changes implemented in 2008. STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director Attachments: Business registration estimate of revenues and expenditures — DOL option TASK Revenues Tess uncollectibles Total Revenues EXPENSES: Telephone calls, walk -in traffic, questions Finance Dir. Time Half -time employee Fee to Microflex/DOL Register new businesses Software (over 3 yrs) Desk, chair, computer (over 3 yrs) Bank fees for cr. Cards Forms, letters, postage Add non - profits (over 3 years) Recover costs from prior yr Total Exp. Net to City if estimates are accurate CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY BUSINESS REGISTRATION EST. REV /EXP - DOL OPTION JUNE 8, 2004 1 2 STATE DOL CITY FEE ONLY $ 75,000 < -$25 $ 39,000 < —$13 $ (3,750) $ (1,950) $ 71,250 $ 37,050 $ 6,500 $ 2,200 $ $ $ 1,750 $ $ 5,000 S 12,000 $ 59,650 $ 11,600 27,000 5,200 $ 6,500 $ 2,200 $ $ 5,200 $ 1,000 $ 5,000 $ 9,000 2004 costs $ 28,900 $ 8,150 only Column 1: From council meeting June 1 Column 2: Does not include 2003 city costs, nor state registration Note: Column 1 revenues include the $9 fee paid to the state and registration fee discussed at the June 1 council meeting. Column $27,000 in fees which would have been paid by businesses to the those transactions between businesses and the city. fees the $16 proposed city 1 expenditures include the state. Column 2 reflects only Meeting Date: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action June 22, 2004 City Manager Sign -off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information E admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution No. 04-020 Repealing and Replacing Resolution No. 03 -022, Specifying Various Employee Leave Provisions GOVERNING LEGISLATION: There are various state and federal laws and regulations governing certain types of leave for employees, such as the federal and state Family and Medical Leave Acts (FMLA). PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council adopted Resolution No. 03 -022 on March 20, 2003, specifying employee leave benefit provisions. BACKGROUND: Sections 6 and 7 of Resolution No. 03 -022, governing employee leave without pay, are inconsistent with the City's agreement with Association of Washington Cities, who administers the City's employee insurance plan. In addition, Section 8, which provides for family and medical leave, is inconsistent with 2003 changes to state regulations implementing the Washington Act. The attached background information proposes some changes, which would bring the City resolution into compliance with our insurance plan and with the state. OPTIONS: Leave Resolution No. 03 -022 unchanged. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to schedule Resolution No. 04 -020 for Council consideration at the June 29, 2004 meeting, or provide additional direction to staff. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS 1. Summary of Proposed Changes MODIFYING EMPLOYEE .LEAVE :PROVISIONS Summary of Proposed Changes On March 20, 2003, Council adopted Resolution No. 03 -022 specifying various types of employee leave benefits. Staff is proposing some changes to the leaves without pay and the family and medical leave. Leaves without Pay Sections 6 and 7 of Resolution No. 03 -022 govern employee leaves without pay. These two sections are inconsistent with the City's agreement with Association of Washington Cities, who administers the City's employee insurance plan. There are two types of leave without pay. The shorter -term, simpler leave, called Leave without Pay, may be approved for up to three weeks. During this leave, the employee continues to accrue vacation and sick leave, and his/her insurance coverage continues unaffected. The longer -term leave, Leave of Absence without Pay, may be granted for more than three weeks up to a maximum of 26 weeks. It is more complex in nature, in that it impacts certain other employee benefits. During this type of leave, the employee no longer accrues vacation and sick leave, and his/her insurance is no longer paid by the City. In addition, the employee's anniversary date is adjusted by the length of the leave granted. Spokane Valley has an agreement with the Association of Washington Cities (AWC) to administer the City's employee insurance plan. It calls for an employee's insurance status to become inactive if he/she works less than two weeks in a month. The insurance may be reinstated upon the employee's return. This timing is somewhat out of sync with the two leaves without pay. In addition, terminating and reinstating an employee's benefits for short durations is disruptive for the employee and his/her family, as well as burdensome for the City and AWC to administer. The phrasing of the last sentence in both sections concerning leaves without pay may also cause unintended consequences to insurance coverage. The sentence states that, "Leave without pay (leave of absence without pay) may not be taken until an employee has exhausted existing paid leave balances." Staff has interpreted the sentence to mean that by the end of the authorized leave without pay, the employee's paid leaves will have been fully exhausted. This is a flexible interpretation of the language, resulting in a greater likelihood that during extended yet finite absences, the employee will continue to meet the AWC qualification for insurance coverage. Recommendation: • Change the time limits between Leave without Pay and Leave of Absence without Pay to two weeks rather than three. Under this recommendation, the Leave without Pay could be granted for a maximum of two weeks, with a corresponding two week minimum for the Leave of Absence without Pay. This preserves the short-term leave as a simpler leave which doesn't impact insurance or other benefits and is consistent with AWC insurance plan provisions. • Clarify the language which calls for the exhaustion of paid leave banks before the commencement of leave without pay. This would avoid an unnecessary temporary discontinuation of insurance benefits for the employee, and be easier for the City and AWC to administer. Family and Medical .Leave Section 8 of Resolution No. 03 -022 provides for family and medical leave. The current language reads: Employees shall be granted family and medical leave in accordance with the provisions of the State Fancily Leave Act, Chapter 49.78 RC'W and the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Family and medical leave granted under either of such Acts shall be unpaid unless otherwise provided therein. Up to 40 hours of sick leave may be used per calendar year to care for an employee's parent with a serious health condition meeting the criteria for leave under the Federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA). Regulations governing the State Family Leave Act changed in 2003. As a result, the limitation of 40 hours of sick leave to care for a parent is no longer valid. Recommendation: Clarify the language so that as state and federal guidelines change, the resolution remains current. A suggested change would be, The City shall provide family and medical leave as required under the applicable state and federal laws. Sliotirkane Memorandum To: David Mercier, City Manager, and Members of Council From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: June 22, 2004 Re: Monthly Report — Summary of June 2004 Activities 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall ©spokanevalley.org Contract Negotiation and Administration • Library Services. An open house was held at the Valley Branch on May 27. There were about 75 visitors. Participants completed a modified version of the telephone survey, which had been conducted earlier by the District. In general, responses were similar to that survey. Coincidentally, the Open House was held shortly after an update on the City's managed competition pilot project. As a result, there were several comments expressed in opposition to "privatization" of library services. An update on the activities of the Library Capital Facilities Committee is scheduled for the June 29 Council meeting. • Fire Services. At its June 14 meeting, the Boundary Review Board (BRB) passed a resolution on the annexation of the City to Fire Districts One and Eight. The resolution includes a compromise boundary change between the two Districts in the Morningside area, where district boundaries cut through the middle of several properties. The resolution is now in a 30 day appeal period. On June 16 the Board of Fire District One passed a resolution requesting a September 14 election, and will forward that resolution to the Spokane County Board of Commissioners. Fire District Eight's Board will consider a similar resolution. A corresponding motion is scheduled on City Council's June 22 meeting. • Settle - and - Adjust. City and County staff continue to work on reconciling the three remaining 2003 settle and - adjust contracts. The law enforcement and parks maintenance contract are expected to be resolved by the end of June, with the court contract taking somewhat longer. Committees • Salary Commission. The Salary Commission held its first meeting on June 16. The group reviewed the salary commission ordinance and 2003 salary data. They deferred electing a Chair and Vice Chair until the next meeting, because one member was absent. They selected ten cities to compare to, and also drafted a list of questions for Spokane Valley members of Council. Their next meeting is tentatively set for June 30, 2004. Web Site Summary — Month of May Unique User Sessions 12,680 Top Five Pages Viewed* Employment 1,504 GIS /Maps 293 Departments 269 Council Agendas and Minutes 253 Recreation 235 Top Five "Referrer" Web Sites Municipal Research and Services Center (MRSC) 221 Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce 121 Spokane Valley Online 94 Spokane County Library District 52 \,VorkSource Spokane 47 Deputy City Manager Monthly Report — June 2004, continued .tune 22, 2004 Page 2 of 2 op erations • Reorganization in Community Development Department. Upon the resignation of Kevin Snyder, Current Planning Manager, the Community Development Department has reorganized. Current and Long Range Planning are combining under Planning Manager Greg McCormick. The City will be replacing the Current Planning Manager (Grade 18) with a Senior Planner position (Grade 16). In addition, the City will be hiring a third Permit Specialist (Grade 11/12) in place of an Assistant Planner position (Grade 14) which has been authorized and budgeted, but never filled. The three permit specialists will broaden their responsibilities to include not only building and rights -of -way permits, but also assistance to planning. These changes were made to help staff become more effective, and to improve customer service. The City will be hiring temporary assistance during the employee recruitments. • Other Human Resources Issues. Mary Baslington has moved into the Accounting Teclmician position when that position was recently vacated. The Administrative Assistant to the Deputy City Manager /Finance /Legal will remain vacant while we evaluate our long -term needs in this area. Recreation Coordinator Shelley Goss has resigned to accept a position out of state. For this season, the Parks Department has promoted a qualified Recreation Assistant to the role of seasonal Recreation Coordinator. The Department is evaluating various options for its long -term organizational structure. * Note: Numbers reflect full or majority weeks of the month. It should he noted that a Hot Topics page was created late during the month of May, and was also among the top five pages viewed for the last week of the month. S4�I `' � jValley L_2 Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: June 10, 2004 Re: Monthly Report 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall ©spokanevalley.org During late May and early June, Finance employees worked on the following projects: Budget variance /investment reports Reports showing a comparison of fund revenues and expenditures to our 2004 amended budget at May 31, 2004, are attached. If revenues and expenditures flowed to the City equally over the twelve months, we would expect to see 42% in the right -hand column. Revenues and expenditures do not flow equally in twelve monthly installments so the percentages appearing in the right hand column will often be skewed. Overall, revenues and expenditures are in line with our projections. The investment report at May 31, 2004 is also attached. Business rerzistration The City has over 2,900 registered businesses. A separate list of businesses and contractors who may be operating within our city limits will add a few to the 2,900 already in the database Planning session (retreat) in late June Information is being gathered for the retreat. We expect to talk about operating revenues and expenditures in the General and Street Funds, and the need for capital project financing. Departments will update the council on the status of their work plans. 2005 budget process Based on the 2005 budget calendar adopted by the City Council last month, staff is preparing documents to begin the budget process. The calendar anticipates budget adoption hi early November this year, about 30 days ahead of our process in 2003. Departments have been asked to hold the line on expenditures to enable the city to retire debt created in 2003 to pay startup costs. The proposed initiative to reduce property taxes, if passed, would reduce city property tax receipts by $2.3 million in 2005. Quarterly gambling tax returns A review of these reports indicates most businesses are following the county's procedures and calculations when they file their returns. The city's ordinance requires different calculations. Updated instructions and a new form will be included in the quarterly mailing to gambling establishments in early July, for use in preparing the second quarter 2004 report. Baslington learns accounting technician duties Mary Bashngton is learning the duties of the accounting technician position which was vacated when Ellen Avey accepted a position with Deaconess Medical Center. Maintaining the sales tax database of retailers We continue to find retail outlets that are using incorrect codes on their monthly reports to the Washington State Department of Revenue. As these outlets begin using the City of Spokane Valley's code, our sales tax receipts increase. This problem reinforces our need to review sales tax reports each month. Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent 2004 Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized General Fund Revenues: Property Tax $ 9,265,809 $ 3,393.566 $ 3,817,006 $ 5,448,803 41.19% 1 Sales Tax 11,920,000 1,176,009 4,452,725 7,467,275 37.36 Gambling Tax 690,000 44 223,002 466,998 32.32 2 Leasehold Excise Tax 5,000 64 2,610 2,390 52.20 Franchise Fees 640,000 153,620 486,380 24.00 2 State Shared Revenues 882,816 261,513 621,303 29.62 3 Planning & Building Fees 939,000 180,857 733,593 205,407 78.12 Fines and Forfeitures 400,000 100,513 408.221 (8,221) 102.06 4 Recreation Program Fees 229,000 5,631 28,473 200,527 12.43 5 Investment Interest 18,000 7,259 12,902 5,098 71.68 Operating Transfers 122,500 34,300 34,300 88,200 28.00 $ 25,112,125 $ 4,898,043 $ 10,127,966 $ 14,984,159 40.33% General Fund Expenditures: Legislative Branch Executive & Legislative Support Public Safety Operations & Administrative Svcs Public Works Planning & Community Dev. Library Services Parks & Recreation General Govemment 61912004 3:20 PM City of Spokane Valley General Fund Budget Variance Report For the Period January 1 - May 31, 2004 Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent 2004 Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Realized $ 215,372 $ 8,816 $ 100,608 $ 114,784 46.71% 438,482 27,171 138,244 300,238 31.53 14,093,990 1,364,782 6,023,793 8,070,197 42.74 917,605 77,338 328,533 589,072 35.80 631,079 54,673 237,675 393,404 37.66 1,544, 519 104,787 489,405 1,055,114 31.69 2,053,250 1,010,148 1,010,148 1.043,102 49.20 1,709,780 162,244 494,998 1,214,782 28.95 3,450,578 50,346 508,256 2,942,322 14.73 S 25,054,655 S 2,860,305 $ 9,331,660 $ 15,722,995 37.25% 6/9/2004 3 :57 PM City of Spokane Valley Other Funds Budget Variance Report For the Period January 1 - May 31, 2004 Budget 2004 Other Funds Revenues: Street Fund $ 2,062.200 Arterial Street Fund 542,000 Trails and Paths 12,800 Hotel /Motel Fund 380,000 Debt Service - LTGO 03 800,000 Capital Projects Fund 840,000 Special Capital Projects Fund 840,000 Street Capital Projects 3,230,000 Mirabeau Point Project Street Bond Capital Projects CD Block Grant Fund 504,000 Capital Grants Fund 837,000 Barker Bridge Reconstruction 702,000 Stormwater Mgmt Fund 747,500 Equip. Rental & Replacement 146,634 Risk Management 137,500 $ 11,781,634 Budget 2004 Other Funds Expenditures: Street Fund $ 3,773,184 Arterial Street Fund 600,000 Hotel /Motel Fund 475,000 Debt Service LTGO 03 800,000 Capital Projects Fund 180,000 Special Capital Projects Fund 300,000 Street Capital Projects 3,219,700 Mirabeau Point Project 9,500,000 Street Bond Capital Projects 2,430,000 CD Block Grant Fund 504,000 Capital Grants Fund 837,000 Barker Bridge Reconstruction 702,000 Sewer Fund 238,608 Stormwater Mgmt Fund 518,700 Equip. Rental & Replacemnt 43,600 Risk Management 137,500 May YTD Unrealized Revenues Revenues Revenue $ 149,649 $ 526,623 $ 1,535,577 25.54% 53.553 171,789 370,211 31.70 - - 12,800 26,944 80,819 299,181 21.27 225,561 225,561 574,439 28.20 72,817 274,193 565,807 32.64 72,682 273,408 566,592 32.55 112 200,112 3,029,888 6.20 97,323 421,697 (421,697) - 3,435 12,536 (12,536) - - 504,000 4,300 4,300 832.700 0.51 - 702,000 289,427 338,521 408,979 5 25 146,609 - 130,000 7,500 $ 995,808 $ 2,659,584 $ 9,122,050 May YTD Unrealized Percent Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Realized $ 81,733 $ 894,553 30,500 223,683 225,561 225,561 25.945 25,945 25,945 225,945 62,184 38,222 159,430 4,300 4,513 4,300 4,300 195,998 8,154 2,697 30,520 111,066 $ 24,259,292 $ 439,203 $ 2,171,852 S Percent Realized 6 6 45.29 0,02 11 94.55 13 22.57% 2,878,631 23.71% 600,000 - 7 251.317 47.09 574,439 28.20 154,055 14.41 7 74,055 75.32 7 3,157,516 1.93 8 9,340.570 1.68 2,425,487 0.19 8 504,000 8 832,700 0.51 8 702,000 - 8 42,610 82,14 510,546 1.57 9 13,080 70.00 12 26,434 80.78 10 22,087,440 8.95% 6/9/2004 3:20 PM City of Spokane Valley General Fund Budget Variance Report For the Period January 1 - May 31, 2004 FOOTNOTES Note: 1. Property taxes are due in two equal installments on April 30 and October 31. The majority of revenues from property taxes is received on May 10 and November 10. 2. Gambling taxes and franchise fees are due quarterly with the first quarter due April 30. 3. State shared revenues (liquor) are received quarterly on succeeding months. 4 Over one -half this revenue will be paid to the state 5 A more conservative approach to expanding recreational programs will result in less income than anticipated. 6 Cash and expenditure appropriations are available. However, revenues were not listed in the 2004 budget. The next budget amendment will correct this oversight. 7 These funds are used primarily for capital projects. Cash is not actually moved from these funds to the construction funds until needed. 8 Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, acquire right of way and construct. While the projects budgeted will eventually proceed, we should not expect costs to flow evenly throughout the year. 9 60% of this budget is tied to potential construction projects which are not yet underway. 10 Annual city insurance premiums are paid in January 11 Internal journal entry will be made twice/year 12 Vehicle purchased in early 2004 which represents a Iarae part of budget 13 Internal transfer made in early 2004 to pay for city insurance If revenues and expenditures were distributed evenly by month, throughout the year, the percent realized column would show 42% at May 31. This does not normally happen because some revenues and expenditures are seasonal in nature. 6/9/2004 3:57 PM dec Beginning Deposits Withdrawls Interest Ending City of Spokane Valley Investment Report For the Month Ending May 31, 2004 Total LGIP* F &M MM Investments $ 9,559,376.72 $ 4,534,276.53 $ 14,093,653.25 2,582,498.42 3,000,000.00 5,582,498.42 (1,211,500.00) (2,100,000.00) (3,311,500.00) 8,525.42 10,107.58 18, 633.00 $ 10,938,900.56 $ 5,444,384.11 $ 16 383 284.67 Balances by Fund General Fund Street Fund Arterial Street Hotel /Motel Capital Projects Spec. Capital Proj. Street Capital Proj Mirabeau Point Proj. Street Bond Proj, Stormwater Mgmt. Equipment Rental Risk Management $ 2,927,691.96 1,367,913.02 458,125.25 78,670.77 823,162.24 557,377.84 125,111.48 7,046,808.32 2,450,240.02 542,446.20 28.57 5,709.00 $ 16,383,284.67 *Local Government Investment Pool CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MONTHLY REPORT FOR MAY 2004 LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION: Page 1 of 6 During the month of May, the Long Range Planning Division met twice with the Planning Commission at regular meetings on May 13 and 27 At the May 13 meeting, the Commission conducted public hearings on two street vacation applications, #STA -01 -04 and #STA - 02-04. The Commission formulated recommendations on both requests to be forwarded to City Council for final disposition. Additionally, staff provided an overview of a Draft Housing Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The Commission's May 27 meeting included a re- hearing of the 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments, which were required due to an Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board decision. The Commission's recommendations on these will be forwarded to City Council for final action. LRP staff also provided an overview of the Draft Private Utilities Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The Long Range Planning Division conducted the third community workshop on the City's comprehensive plan. The workshop was held on May 12 at East Valley High School library. The meeting was attended by approximately 12 citizens. Staff had several displays available for the public to view at the "Open House" portion of the workshop that began a 6:30 p.m. The formal workshop began at 7:00 during which city staff presented an overview of the planning requirements for the city. This presentation was followed by small group exercises during which members were asked to write down the top three city -wide issues and top 3 neighborhood issues they would address if they were "Mayor for a Day ". The small groups then presented their results to the larger group. As did the previous two workshops held in March and April, this workshop was well received and produced high quality input from the community for the comprehensive plan. Additional community workshops are scheduled for June 2 and 17 and September Stn Additional meetings will be scheduled for this fall. The community survey results and final report were presented to City Council at a study session on May 4 The project manager from Clearwater Research, Inc. provided the Council with an overview of the survey results and responded to questions of the Council regarding the survey. The results of the survey are available on the City's website. CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION: City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for May 2004 The Current Planning Division opened 26 application files in May. In addition, 35 decisions for various land use actions were issued and 9 licenses /permits were sold. In order to make the chart easier to follow, activity has been consolidated into two categories: License /Permits (adult entertainment, sign review permits); and Land Actions (binding site plans, rezones, subdivisions, short plats, boundary line adjustments, street vacations, site plan reviews and SEPA reviews). Site Plan Review Sign Permit Review Boundary Line Adjustments SEPA Review Shoff PIal Subdivi!ioo Rezone Nome Profession Binding Site Plan Adud EntertainG;enf License 2004 MONTHLY CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITY BY CATEGORY 100% 50% 091 A comparison of new application /permit/license activity through the month of May to the annual projection for each of these is shown below: 2004 CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITY ANNUAL COMPARISON Page 2 of 6 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1 02004 Projections ■Activity to Date $30,000 $20,000 $1o,000 $o City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for May 2004 Monthly revenue for the Current Planning Division totaled $20,760 in May. The Division's total income for 2004 equals $93,502. 2004 CURRENT PLANNING REVENUE 1 K C C - G (D 0 o 0 ..< m Z co a < 0 In May 2004, the Current Planning Division continued to experience a busy workload. The Division processed a high number of permits and applications, met with current clients on key project issues and met with potential new clients to answer development questions and explain City regulations and policies. Individual staff managed a large number of applications ranging from 10 to 18 apiece, and also responded in a timely manner to an on -going steady volume of phone calls. At the Planning Counter, staff served 313 customers and returned or answered 310 phone calls. In May, the Current Planning Division and the Development Engineering Division jointly participated in the first public hearings for street vacations before the Planning Commission. In addition, two public hearings before the City's Hearing Examiner were conducted. Kevin Snyder, Current Planning Manager, has resigned effective June 4 Kevin is returning to the Vancouver area where he has accepted the position of Planning Director for the City of Ridgefield, WA. Kevin has made a significant contribution to the City's Community Development Department and we wish congratulate him on his excellent career opportunity, thank him publicly for his good work, and wish him all the luck in the world. Page 3 of 6 BUILDING DIVISION: 300 2ao 100 0 $150,000.00 S125,000.00 $100,000.00 $75,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for May 2004 The Building Division issued 230 permits in May. This is a slight drop in the number of permits issued from April numbers; however the permits issued were for a higher number of major projects. New commercial construction involved eight of those permits. Twenty -two new single - family dwellings and six duplexes were permitted. In addition, six multi- family buildings with a total of 112 living units were issued permits. T CD 0 v The Building Division brought in $116,458.77 in License and Permit fees and $31,956.19 in Plan Review fees during the month of May. Total Building Division income for 2004 equals $552,053.29. We have already received over 60% of projected Building Department revenue in five months, and our busiest months of the year are yet to come. 2004 BUILDING PERMITS SOLD D.. D to 0 77 O m c m M 0 N cm a 0 • Camiercial Pemits 0 Residential Ferrits 2004 BUILDING REVENUE Page 4 of 6 L Cr) O 0 CD m 0 0 cu . ..4 fa -z 0 In 20 business days we performed 863 inspections. This averages out to just over 43 inspections per day. Mr. Calasopa, performed 138 inspections as an on -call inspector. The inspection activity exceeds our target level of 12 inspections per inspector per day. Unfortunately for us, Mr. Calasopa is planning on pursuing his retirement on a full -time basis and will not be available to help us after the first of June. We have renewed our request for additional on -call inspection staff, and have advertised locally and nationally for inspection staff to help manage this huge workload. 1000 800 600 40D 200 0 City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for May 2004 2004 BUILDING INSPECTIONS Page 5 of 6 a cn 0 Z 0 C c c to c , o m c ..0 m 1 3 < o l0 Permits were issued for an 85' tall Cement Terminal for LaFarge North America on North Sullivan; and a 40 -unit, three -story apartment building on East Broadway; and several one - story, multi - family retirement buildings. Our plan review remains very active. Pre- application meetings indicate several hundred multi- family style units are in the planning stages. The Building Official attended a training seminar sponsored by APA, concerning Braced Panel construction. The training was so effective that additional training was scheduled at the Spokane City Hall for the other staff members. This training is provided free of charge. A new information pamphlet -has been approved by the City Manager. This handout was created by Permit Specialist Dawn Dompier. This meets one of our Work Plan goals. It will be available in the Permit Center and eventually a version will be placed on the City's website. A copy is attached to this report. 1000 100 10 CODE ENFORCEMENT: The number of 'Violations Reported" on the chart below reflects actual Spokane Valley Zoning Code violations, plus complaints received which were not violations. The complaints received have been added to the total this month because they reflect time officers spent in the field conducting investigations. In addition, the "Investigated" and "Pending" columns accurately reflect Code Enforcement's current ability to process and investigate backlog cases due to additional staffing. • Solid Waste @Junk Avta • Pioperlp e! Environmental City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development Monthly Report for May 2004 100% ./ 90% - 30% -- 70% EO% '.O% • 40% 30% 20% • 10%- 0x • 00Complaint • No 110 Ia1D70 CODE ENFORCEMENT STATUS Feb 10 11 10 21 19 13 11 6 9 @Violations Repotted ®Abatements oFEle Tiansiers @Pending Fees 2004 CODE VIOLATIONS REPORTED (BY TYPE) 14 Page 6 of 6 0 52 • ti. The chart below provides a monthly comparison of the types of Spokane Valley Code violations reported. In order to make the chart easier to follow, activity has been consolidated into the following five categories: Environmental (sewer /septic, critical areas, animal and nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way, property use, dangerous building, landlord/tenant, illegal business and signage violations); Junk Auto; Solid Waste (solid waste, illegal dumping, and household waste violations); and Complaint — No Violation. When Is A Permit R quired? Any owner or authorized agent who intends to construct, enlarge, alter. repair. move, demolish or change the occupancy of a structure: or to erect, install, enlarge, alter, repair, remove, con- vert or replace any gas, mechanical or plumbing system, the installation of which is regulated by the adopted codes; is required to obtain a permit. What Information Is Required? To apply for a building permit, you will need to provide the following: • Description of the work proposed. owner's authorized agent. • Legal description. parcel number and/ or street address that will identify the loca- tion of proposed work. • Indicate the use and occupancy of the fin- ished building or structure. • Two (2) complete sets of detailed construc- tion drawings showing work to be done. • Valuation of project. • Application must be signed by owner or Construction Drawing Requirements To apply for residential permits, we need two (2) sets of construction drawings which include the following: foun- dation plan, floor plan, cross section, elevation and any structural details that are pertinent to your project. We also need two (2) copies of a site plan. Minimum requirements for the site plan are: • Site address • Scaled drawing • North arrow • Abutting street names • Actual property lines, corners and dimensions. • Proposed number of stories with peak height. • Actual footprint of existing and /or new structures with dimensions of structures. • Proposed and existing setbacks. Distances (in feet) be- tween all existing and pro- posed structures. • Location of existing and /or proposed driveways. • Identification of all easements on property. Unconventional Construction The Building Division may require a Washington State Engineer's or Architect's stamp that the Uniform Devel- opment Code does not specifi- cally require. Examples of struc- tures that require professional plans are: log homes, straw bale homes and earth shelter homes. Permit Processing Time Frame Most residential permits can be issued within five (5) days with a completed application and all required plans submitted. Some permits, including new con- struction, may require approvals from other agencies such as, Spokane County Utilities or Spokane County Environmental Health. When approvals are needed from outside agencies. it can extend the issuance of the permit. Building Permit Fees Building permit fees for each project are set by the City of Spokane Valley's Master Fee Schedule. The table in the fee schedule is used to determine the building permit fees and plans check fees based on the value of the construction supplied by the applicant or the value calculated by using the latest valuation data published in the Building and Safety Journal by the International Code Council, whichever is greatest. The Master Fee Schedule is published on the City's website at www.spokanevalley.org go to "Community Develop- ment" then to "Building" Residential Building Permit Information This brochure Is to provide you guidance and understanding of what Information Is necessary to complete a building permit application, and to provide you with addi- tional information which you may find help- ful through the permitting process. NOTICE Effective July 1, 2004: The City of Spokane Valley has adopted the following codes, as amended by the Wash- ington State Building Code Council pursu- ant to RCW 19.27.074: 2003 International Building Code, 2003 International Resi- dential Code, 2003 International Mechani- cal Code, 2003 International Flre Code, 2003 Uniform Plumbing Code & Uniform Plumbing Standards, 2003 International Fuel Gas Code, 2001 Second Edition Washington State Energy Code, 1997 Edi- tion of the Uniform Code for Abatement of Dangerous Buildings, 2003 International Property Maintenance Code. Copies of these codes may be studied at our permit center 8:OOam to 5:OOpm Monday through Friday. 11707 E S ' ,Suite 9 Spokane Valley, WA c•I r1� �n pokane ■ Valley Community Development 8uikiing Division 11707 F_ Sprague Ave. Site 106 Spobwte valley, WA 99206 Phone: 509.698-0036 Fax: 509.688.0037 Etna' 1: Nww.spa&enevalley.org How TO OBTAIN A RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT Building Division Office Hours: 8:OOam to 5:OOpm Monday through FrI7 509.688.0036 Agreements for Services Adopted and in Operation: • County Street Maintenance Proposed Contract Changes for 2005: o In 2005 Contract, propose to delete reference under 'Basic Services' that work be done as customarily done by the County and add that work be as directed by the City. o More detailed definition will be developed to the list of activities. o County's Foreman would become a contract employee to the City and the Foremen would then work directly with us to determine the daily work. • Street Maintenance - WSDOT • County Engineering Services Proposed Contract Changes for 2005: o Development task proposed to be cut from 2005 budget. o All traffic tasks proposed to be cut in 2005 budget. o All Planning tasks proposed to be cut in 2005 budget. o Contract Landscape Maintenance proposed to be transferred to the City in 2005. o Pavement Management tasks for GIS, Database & Ratings proposed to be cut in 2005 budget. o Total reduction is $217,713. • County Utilities - Storm Water Management Contract ends on December 31, 2004. • Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal Wastewater: • Wastewater Treatment — Waiting for County's revised agreement. • County purchased 20 acre Stockyards site for $3.54 million on June 3, 2004. • EIS to be completed on Playfair site by July 12, 2004 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT May 2004 Capital Projects: • Construction Projects o Centerplace Site rough graded, drywells installed. Basement walls, underground conduits and floor slab complete. Forming and pouring concrete for basement mechanical well walls. Completed 95% of all building foundation footings and stem walls. Parking lot lighting conduit installed, installing light foundations. 85% of 6" water line and fire hydrants installed. Sewer line installed. 3 months into 14 month schedule. Change Order Status: waiting on final costs for 2 floor senior wing changes, dance floor addition and fire rated corridor deduction. o Evergreen Road /Setters Sanitary Sewer Project Placing Sidewalk and finishing curb at 16th intersection. Setting traffic loops. Subgrade being prepared for rock placement between 2nd and 4th. Paving from 4th to 16th - Wednesday 6/9 o 16th Avenue Project Project Awarded to Inland Asphalt - Pre - construction conference 6/7 o Park Road Project Last R/W issue to be resolved this week - Brookdale Living Communities Begin Construction - July o 24th Avenue Sidewalk Project Design Work - 75% Complete. Begin Construction — July. Construction Complete - September o Sullivan & 4th Signal Begin Construction — July. Construction Complete - August o South Greenacres Sanitary Sewer Project (Flora & Mission) Complete o Weatherwood /Owens Sanitary Sewer Project Placing Mainline on Maxwell (West of McDonald) and Boone (East of McDonald) Placing side sewers on DesMet and Cataldo (West of McDonald) ACP Placement on Mamer Tuesday 6/8, Construction Complete — Sept. 15th o Veradale Sanitary Sewer Project Placing Mainline on Adams (North of Broadway) Placing side sewers on St. Charles and Progress (North of Broadway) Construction Complete - August o Sipple Sanitary Sewer Project Project awarded to Norms - awaiting Pre - construction conference Construction Complete — October 15th o Carnahan Sanitary Sewer Project Project awarded to Norms - awaiting Pre - construction conference Construction Complete — October 15th • Planning Projects o Valley Corridor EA Met with FHWA to review project and Environmental Assessment (EA) process. Requested $80,500 from SRTC to complete EA study. SRTC Board meets 6/10. Working with consultant Jones & Stokes on scope and fee for services to complete the EA. Maintenance Activity: • Estimated cost from the County for 2004 is $3,113,268. • City budget for $2,420,120 for street maintenance in 2004. • Through the end of April the County has billed $856,474 or 35% of available funds. • Major items completed this year in 2004 are: o Shoulder repair- $14,090 o Pothole patching- $81,890 o Repair of Gravel Roads- $18,636 o Liquid Deicing- $68,961 o Sanding- $75,409 o Snow Removal- $86,498 o Sweeping- $198,698.04 o Brush/Tree Clearing- $6,053 o Storm water repair- $13,981 o Traffic signs /signal- $106,943 Land Development • Applications Reviewed /Conditions Prepared (Including Comm. Pre -App): Commercial Projects — 6/22*, Residential Projects — 6/16 • Road and Drainage Plan Review: Commercial — 0/4, Residential — 5/8 • Hearings Held: Commercial — 0, Residential — 2/4 • Construction Walk - Throughs: Commercial — 0, Residential — 0/1 • Rezone Applications: Commercial — 1/1, Residential — 3/5 "(current month totals/annual totals) Evergreen Road Sullivan Road & 4th Ave. Signal • Park Road - Project 2 • 16th Avenue - Project 2 24th Avenue Sidewalk Project • Pines/Mansfield O. Spokane .. Valley 2004 PROPOSED PROJECTS Road Construction Projects Project Location 16th Ave. to 2nd Ave. Sullivan & 4th 8th Ave. to 2nd Ave. Dishman -Mica to SR 27 Bowdish to Pines Wilbur Rd. to Pines Rd., Pines to 190 Road Design Projects Barker Road Reconstruction Boone to Barker Rd. Bridge Barker Road Bridge Replacement Barker Rd. at Spokane River Sewer Projects Carnahan Weatheiwood /Owens Sipple Veradale South Green Acres - Phase 1 Burns Road Miscellaneous Projects Miscellaneous Valley Couplet Road Replacement Projects Consultant Contract Centerplace at Mirabeau Point Construction in Progress Stormwater Drainage Projects Statewide Transportation Plan (STIP) Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) '" Bridge Replacement Advisory Committee (BRAG) 2004 Construction Projects (MR) -Mar 1 -90 to 8th, Havanna to Eastem McDonald to Mamer, Mission to Mallon Vercler to Maurer, 1 -90 to Boone Dalton to Rutter, Bradley to Vista Calvin to Sommer, Springfield to Main Indiana to Mission & Flora to Long Rd. Capital Improvement Projects Completion Date Design Construction Complete Complete 7/15/04 100% 40% 7/1104 PE i RJW Complete 0% 10/1/04 90% 0% 11/1/04 95% 0% 9/1/04 0% 0% 10/1/05 0% 0% 10/15/05 0% 0% $ 1,150,000 $ 2,998,200 12/1/06 0% 0% $ 702,000 $ 8,057,615 11/1/04 11/1/04 11/1/04 11/1/04 7/31/04 Total 75% 0% $ 2,569,000 $ 2,569,000 100% 0% $ 4,083,000 $ 4,083,000 40% 100% 100% 0% 0% 40% $ 1,521,000 $ 15,700 $ 821,000 $ 1,932,000 $ 198,000 $ 620,000 2004 Funding Total Project Cost $ 2,787,000 $ 165,000 $ 972,000 $ 3,302,000 $ 198,000 $ 3,134,000 2,914,000 $ 2,914,000 2,985,000 $ 2,985.000 - $ 380,000 31,000 $ 31,000.00 50,000 $ 50,000.00 $ 15,000 $ 15,000.00 S 830,000 $ 830,000.00 S 60,000 $ 60,000.00 S 9,500,000 S 9,500,000 $ 200,000 S 200,000.00 $ 30,196,700 $ 45,230,815 �.J spokan�� ■ Va11ey Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, Nina Regor, Members of City Council From: Mike Jackson Date: June 10, 2004 Re: Monthly Report, June 2004 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall @spokanevalley.org Administration and Parks • The Recreation Coordinator has resigned. The position has been filled on a seasonal basis. • There have been over 88 park reservations taken so far this year. • Staff has selected a consultant to develop the parks and recreation master plan. This will go to Council June 22 for approval. • It has been determined that a wood dance floor may be installed in the Senior Center wing at CenterPlace. The Senior Association must meet certain conditions. • The swimming pools will open June 18 for summer operation. • Aquatic handicap lifts have been ordered for two of the pools. Recreation: • Day camp is at 65% capacity. Indoor Playground has been reduced to two sessions and is 42% full. Play Camp has been reduced to two sessions and is 50% full. • Making final preparations for summer staff to start — by the end of the month they will be trained and the programs will be started. • Bussing schedule confirmed with Laidlaw. • All supplies are organized and shirts have been ordered for summer camps. Senior Center: • Wednesday Dances are averaging 53 per week • Nutrition meals averages 60 every Tuesday & Thursday • The Center received 25 Senior Directories with information ranging from housing assistance to elder law attorneys and contact numbers and addresses. We handed them all out in 10 days. This was the second order. • Safety lights in front of the building were repaired by the County • Washington State Association of Senior Centers Conference in Silverdale was extraordinary, May 26 -28` Speakers were outstanding subjects: Customer Service, ideas of Ageism, and Behaviors and the reason behind them, and Dealing with Difficult people • Average age of participants currently at the Center is 76, born in 1928. MEMO TO: Dave Mercier, City Manager FROM: Dale Golman, Administrative Sergeant DATE: June 9, 2004 RE: Monthly Report May 2004 Attached is the activity report for May for the Spokane Valley Police Department. There were a total of 5,618 computer -aided dispatch (CAD) incidents. These are self - initiated officer contacts, as well as calls for service. Out of those 5,618 incidents, 1,932 actual reports were taken during the month of May. Attached is the breakdown describing those incidents. Additionally, there were 1,824 traffic stops conducted that resulted in 322 traffic reports. I have included hotspot maps for May residential burglaries, May traffic accidents and May commercial burglaries, along with April and May stolen vehicles. ADMINSTEATIV E ♦ This month the Spokane Valley Police Department received a copy of the Community Preference Survey conducted jointly by Clearwater Research, Inc. of Boise, ID and the Spokane Valley Community Development Department. This was a telephone survey with a random sample of 400 Spokane Valley adults. On Page 2, the "Public Services" section, 1 quote, "Underscoring a high level of confidence in the Spokane Valley police force, 85% of respondents indicated that the quality of police services was good, very good, or excellent." Even though this is a great mark for the SVPD, the survey results on Page 3 under "Personal Safety" is more remarkable. I quote, "The overwhelming majority of respondents felt that Spokane Valley was a safe place to live. Further, 95% of respondents said their neighborhood was a safe place to live highlighting a strong sense of personal safety among the majority of respondents." The overall goal of the SVPD is to provide a safe community for its residence. ♦ After months of working on language, I believe that we are nearing completion on the contract for the lease agreement for the Valley Precinct. I expect that this item will come before council in the very near future for consideration. COMMUNITY - ORIENTED POLICING This month our community gave back to the men and women of Law Enforcement with many thanks, and honors. ♦ The Spokane County Sheriffs Office, Spokane Valley Police, and the Spokane Police Department's chaplainry programs hosted a law enforcement appreciation breakfast. Local politicians, citizens, and a vast representation of law enforcement members from local state, and federal agencies attended the event. ♦ The l8 annual Law Enforcement Officer's Memorial Service was held at the Public Safety Building on May 10 Honored were four Officers killed in the line of duty: Ferry County Undersheriff Matt Lane — 5/30/03 Chelan County Deputy Saul Gallegos - 6/26/03 Federal Way Officer Patrick Maher — 8/2/03 and our own Spokane County Deputy James Slater — 8/29/03. OPERATIONS ♦ On May 7 the SCSO /SVPD graduated four new Reserve Deputies from the Spokane Police Department's Reserve Officer Academy. This brings our number of volunteer Reserve Officers to thirty -two. ♦ Five members of the SVPD (one School Resource Officer and four patrolman) attended a 32 -hour Police Bike course conducted by the Spokane County Sheriff Office. These officers are certified to conduct Bike Patrols on the Centennial Trail, the Edgecliff area (specified by the Weed and Seed grant), and other specific areas throughout the Spokane Valley. An up -date of some of the more notable incidents follows: ♦ Officer Darryl Stidham responded to a disorderly teenager at a group home. As he was approaching the front door, the out of control 14- year -old stepped into the doorway and sprayed Officer Stidham in the face with a dry chemical fire extinguisher. Officer Stidham suffered minor /deep cuts to both pupils /eyes. Officer Stidham made a full recovery and has returned to work. ♦ Officer Stevens was conducting routine patrol and noticed suspicious activity involving a truck loaded with a brand new Harley Davidson (laid on its side in the back), towing a new unlicensed trailer with no lights. He coordinated a stop on the vehicle and with the ensuing investigation recovered 4 stolen brand new trailers (all stolen that night), valued at more than $85,000. Our local business owners who were victims of these thefts gained an invaluable appreciation for the high quality of attentiveness and dedication our fine officers have in serving our citizens. ♦ The City of Spokane Valley recorded its first homicide. On May 6, officers responded to a vehicle smashed in a tree at the 600 block of North Farr Rd. Officers and paramedics discovered the victim /driver died of "homicidal violence." Detectives arrested a suspect that afternoon, but didn't charge him at that time. He was held on a Department of Corrections hold. Suspect Lance L. Leighton was later charged with First Degree Murder for the stabbing death of victim Jeffery P. Beiber. ♦ Update: Last month we reported the investigation of a shooting of a 19 -year -old male (occurred April 14), who days later died of his injuries. Detectives have now charged Kevin T. Culp, an associate of the victim, with First Degree Manslaughter. According to detectives, Culp recklessly caused the death of Cedric R. Sykes when he pulled the trigger on a loaded .357 - caliber pistol and the gun fired. The bullet struck Sykes in the neck. Two additional deaths occurred in the Spokane Valley: ♦ A father was charged with homicide by abuse in connection with the death of his three -month old child. Hospital staff discovered the child suffered from skull and rib fractures. ♦ Detectives are continuing an investigation of the death of a woman. Her body was found inside an unattached garage at a home in the 3800 block of North Edgerton. The garage has been remodeled into a recreation /party room. No charges filed at this time and the investigation is continuing. 2004 MAY CRIME REPORTS May, 2004 Year to Date BURGLARY 81 335 FORGERY 24 192 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 142 523 NON - CRIMINAL 109 399 PROPERTY OTHER 157 725 RECOVERED VEHICLES 24 110 STOLEN VEHICLES 47 209 THEFT 276 1,134 UIOBC 0 4 VEHICLE OTHER 8 35 VEHICLE PROWLING 110 518 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 978 4,184 ASSAULT 80 357 DOA/SUICIDE 21 80 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 64 300 HOMICIDE 2 2 KIDNAP 0 8 MENTAL 39 162 MP 12 52 PERSONS OTHER 142 716 ROBBERY 6 20 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 20 90 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 386 1,787 ADULT RAPE 2 15 CHILD ABUSE 10 59 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 19 74 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 2 INDECENT LIBERTIES 3 8 CHILD MOLESTATION 9 38 CHILD RAPE 0 14 RUNAWAY 35 182 SEX OTHER 13 60 STALKING 1 13 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 32 153 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 124 618 DRUG 122 536 ISU OTHER 0 0 TOTAL ISU 122 536 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 322 1,538 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,932 8,665 9th Josep 7 prin9eton re al -Pal E 44th -Buck ye uclid Residential Burglary Q Low - Medium High 0 0.5 " " May 2004 Residential Burglary Hotspots Map Produced: 9 June 2004 14th s - nox c uclid Traffic Accidents ET Low Medium Low Medium MI High G ?naire 57t _ f. 44th 24t c7 ce 0 0.5 1 Mile 1 May 2004 Traffic Accident Hotspots Map Produced: B June 2004 =Pra. iwl Josep 7 L ton --44th U river Fruit Jl Knox Sanson Forker Mile May 2004 Commercial Burglary Hotspots j Pal k E 44th Euclid atald D Map Produced: 0 June 2004 Commercial Burglary 0 0 0 El Low ® Medium MI High 1.- 0 Knox urt- Josep 7 lig ' II C —1 CD D 3 3 -D, en (T. --44th 1 nn eta abeau mbhawk In u trial P k Grdnite Euclid ye iaId 8th <ID 24ti ru tP CD CD ■ Stolen Vehicle Low 1E1 Medium MN High 0.5 1 Mile April & May 2004 Stolen Vehicle Hotspots Map Produced: 9 June 2004 -10 INCIDENT TYPE Year to Date Jan Feb Marct April May June July August Sept Oct Nov Dec 11-S Structure Fire Single Response 99 31 18 16 10 24 11-F Structure Fire 61 10 11 12 17 11 11-W Working Fire 8 2 3 0 1 2 13-5 Vehicle Fire 32 7 7 5 4 14-UH Brush Fire4-ow 22 0 3 7 3 9 15-S Trash Fire 15 0 2 2 7 4 18-5 Alarm System-Single Response 58 16 11 10 7 14 18-F Alarrn System- Full 156 54 32 27 22 21 31-A/B BLS EMS Alarm 982 211 163 206 184 218 31-C/D ALS EMS Alnrm 1155 235 202 232 235 251 31-F 2nd alarm EMS/Mass Casualty 0 0 0 0 0 0 354 Extrication 6 2 0 1 36-F Water Rescue 0 0 0 0 0 0 37-F Tech Rescue 0 0 0 0 0 0 404 Hazmat Investigation 24 6 6 4 3 5 40-F Hazmat Full Response 1 0 0 0 0 1 46-AIB Auto Accident - Unknown In uries 258 63 46 35 57 57 46-C!D Auto Accident - Life Threats 25 7 1 7 3 7 50-S Service Call 81 26 10 14 13 18 MONTHLY TOTAL 2983 670 515 581 569 648 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rcidorts ftr Vale, esough May 31. 2004 :v. Prot Spokane Valley Planning Commission Approved Minutes Council Chambers — City Hall 11707 E. Sprague. Ave. May 13, 2004 [. CALL TO ORDER Planning Commission Chair Gothmann called the meeting to order at 6:32 p.m. H. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Commission, audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance. HI. ROLL CALL Fred Beaulac — Present Bob Blum — Present David Crosby — Present Gail Kogle — Present VI. 1'ITIILIC COMMENT There was no public comment. Bill Gothmann — Present Ian Robertson — Excused Absent John G. Carroll — Present IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Crosby moved that the May 13, 2004 agenda be approved as presented. Commissioner Beaulac seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Crosby and seconded by Commissioner Beaulac that the minutes of the April 8, 2004 Blai :ing Commission meeting he approved as presented. Motion passed unanimously. VII. COMMISSION - REPORTS Scott Kuhta arranged for Spokane County expert, Stan Miller, to present an overview of the past, present and future of Spokane's watershed at a City Hall noon meeting on April 23` Commissioner Kogle attended the meeting and offered copies of her notes to interested Commissioners. Commissioner Kogle attended a TOD Citizens' Advisory Committee meeting on May 3 ". She had nothing new to report, but encouraged Commissioners to stay after the meeting to view the impressive graphic presentation STA produced for the Light Rail project. VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS Ms. Sukup reported that the City's new Grading Ordinance goes into effect on Friday, May 14 City Council extended the deadline for selecting community representatives for the Ad Hoc Sign Committee to May 25` The Council also voted to work with Spokane County for a permit tracking system. Ms. Sukup will be bringing several new items of business to the Planning Commission in the near future: an amendment to an ordinance regarding Administrative Exceptions and Administrative Variances; and a proposed interim zoning district. PX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. OLD BUSINESS: There was no Old Business. B. NEW BUSINESS: Public Bearing — Street Vacation Request #STV- 01 -04. The public hearing was opened at 6:40 p.m. Kevin Snyder, Current Planning Manager, and Sandra Raskell, Assistant Engineer, were introduced to the Commission. Mr. Snyder provided extensive backup (Exhibits 1 -10) and a detailed Power Point presentation (Exhibit 12) for this request. STV -01 -04 is a request by Kurt and Mandee Vigessa, 1420 S. Bettman Road (Parcel No. 35243.1041) and Gene and Lana Balch, 1506 S. Bettman Road (Parcel No. 35243.1014) to vacate a portion of the 15 Avenue public right -of -way abutting said parcels. The Vigessa parcel abuts the 15` Avenue right -of -way on the north and the Balch parcel abuts it on the south. The portion of 15 Avenue requested for vacation measures 60 feet wide by 192.5 long for a total area of 11,550 square feet. This street vacation request was originally submitted to Spokane County in December 2002, prior to the City's incorporation, and was transferred by Spokane County to the City of Spokane Valley at time of incorporation on March 31, 2003. The request was placed on hold pending the City's development of street vacation policies and procedures. The Planning Commission publicly thanked the Balch and Vigessa families for their patience in this process. An additional aspect of this street vacation request is the desire of M.r. Vigessa and another neighbor, Clint Weyrauch, to jointly purchase a small area (7,000 -8,000 square feet) just west of the area presented in STV -01- 04. Mr. Snyder provided a highlighted photo of the additional area, along 9 with a written note from Mr. Weyrauch confirming his interest in moving forward with a second street vacation (Exhibit 1 1). The hearing was open to public testimony at 7:05 p.m. Kurt Vigcssa. 1420 S. Bettman, Spokane. Valley, WA Wished to confirm that he is the legal owner of the small parcel west of his house. In the recent past, his name was not on record as legal owner, and he has taken care of that matter in the past week. The meeting was closed to further public testimony at 7:08 p.m. It was moved that the Planning Commission recommend conditional approval of STV- 01-04 to City Council, pursuant to the recommended conditions of approval contained on pages 9 and 10 of the May 6, 2004 Staff Report and Recommendation. Motion seconded by Commissioner Crosby. Motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Carroll stated that he hopes the City can prevent this type of transaction from becoming necessary in the future by not leaving small parcels of land wedged in between vacated areas. Public hearing For STV -01 -04 was closed at 7:10 p.m. Public Hearing — Street Vacation Request #STV-02-04. The public hearing was opened at 7:11 p.m. Kevin Snyder and Sandra Raskell continued to present relevant information. Mr. Snyder provided extensive backup (Exhibits 1 -7) and a detailed Power Point presentation (Exhibit 8) for this request. STV -02 -04 is a complex request in the Valley's Woodland Terrace area. This area was platted over 100 years ago, and there have been a number of challenges to developers in the area ever since. Applicants for STV -02 -04 include: 1) South Terrace Spokane, LLC, c/o Brian Main, 12810 E. Nora Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99216; 2) Rocky Top, LLC, c/o Mike Schuler, 5813 E. Fourth Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99212; 3) Andrew and Joanne M. Del Pozzi, 4614 E. 13 Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA 99202; and 4) Lindsey Construction, Inc., clo Greg Stir n, P.O. Box 30792, Spokane, WA 99223. Name of Street /Alley Width (feet) Length (feet) Square Footage of Proposed Vacation Custer Street 60 100 6,000 s.f. Lloyd Street 60 100 6,000 s.f. 12 Avenue 30 1,525 45.750 s.f. 13 Avenue 60 330 19,800 s.f. Block 2 Public Alley 12 300 3,600 s.f. Block 3 Public Alley 12 300 3,600 s.f. Block 4 Public Alley 12 300 3,600 s.f. STV -02 -04 is a request to vacate the following approximate public right - of -way dimensions located within the Woodland Terrace Plat: Ms. Raskell verified that the City's Public Works Department doesn't have a problem with vacating 12 and 13 Avenues in this area. In order to connect them, a bridge would have to be built. The hearing was open to public testimony at 7:32 p.m. John Konen, Storhaug Engineering. 1322 N. Monroe., Spokane. WA Mr. Konen provided an historical overview of the process used when Woodland Terrace was platted. 100 years ago, there were no criteria for a viable pla. Once a plat got recorded at the County Auditor's office, it was recorded for all time and became "vested ". Therefore, neighbors have been working out the land use problems together. STV -02 -04 is the result of this type of community effort. Doug Stippleman, 3624 S. Mt. Vernon. formerly of 4713 E. 14` Spokane Valley, WA Mr. Stippleman, a former resident of this area, encouraged the Planning Commission to approve the staff recommendation and forward the application to the City Council. Time is of the essence with this project, since interest rates and the cost of building materials are both predicted to rise within the next several months. The meeting was closed to further public testimony at 7:48 p.m. Commissioner Carroll asked Mr. Snyder if 13 Avenue access would be blocked for property owners who are not named in this application request. Mr. Snyder assured him that access will not be impeded. Commissioner Blum moved that the Planning Commission recommend conditional approval of STV -02 -04 to City Council pursuant to the recommended conditions of approval in the May 6, 2004 Staff Report 4 and Recommendation (pages 11 -12). Commissioner Crosby seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. Public Hearing for STV -02 -04 was closed at 7:55 p.m. The Planning Commission took a short break. The meeting reconvened at 8:04 p.m. Discussion of Comprehensive Plan Housing Chapter Draft. Marina Sukup, Community Development Director, introduced Heather Kauer, Planning Technician. Ms. Kauer provided much of the research material for this draft. Ms. Sukup presented a detailed Power Point presentation to the Commission regarding the development of a Housing plan for the new City, in accordance with GMA Statewide Planning Goal #4. There was some discussion of the draft chapter after Ms. Sukup's presentation. Commissioner Goth.man.n handed her a copy of his proposed changes. Com.missioner Kogle praised staff for providing a great deal of useful information. Commissioner Carroll disliked the tone of the draft chapter, which he likened to a social work program, and would like the tone to be more reflective of a City government. There was a spirited discussion regarding the range of governmental obligations to its citizens. Appointment to Ad Hoc Sign Committee Commissioner Crosby submitted an application to serve on this committee. No other Commissioners wished to serve. Commissioner Beaulac moved to nominate Commissioner Crosby to the Ad Hoc Sign Committee. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Carroll. Motion passed unanimously. X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER Before leaving the country, Commissioner Robertson notified Commissioner Gothmann that the July 22 date tentatively set for the Joint Planning Commission meeting would not work because it conflicts with the Valley Golf Tournament. Commissioners Bcaulac and Kogle will not be attending the May 27 Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Gothmann will be unable to attend the Community Meeting scheduled on June 2 5 XI. ADJOURNMCN`1 There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:02 p.m. SUBMITTED: APPROVED: Debi Alley, Administrative Assistant William H. Gothmann, Chairman 6