Loading...
2005, 01-18 Study Session A(;ENDa C'1T'V' OF SPOK.4NE V 4LLEY' CITI' CU(ivC11. V1'OttKSHFFT .S"1'lilll' STSSION TuerdaN. JanuarN 18, 21111{ 6:1111 li.m. CI'iti' HAL.L AT FtF:i)WOOT► PI,A%A 1170" East Spraguc Avcnuc. Firxi Flo(ir (Plrasc Turn ORAII Elrctronic Drvfc" During thr Nltt-tiag) I)1tiCl'SSIt)N LFALbLIt ti['E3.IH:Ci'/ACTTVT['lt' GC)AL P~~~~l;~ .•lrtDtsctc~~~ivrr Dis~ic:5f~)Il .5;~,jkclr~~ ; -11li"Y.4rlsC'oun.11 ~ 0 171 f111J1t'S'I ~ l:If~ llfl,,ktill fH fi1111;:T:til i'n:~~~~~x~i •lmcndrrient t~~ ~ 11fillfl:tl r~(~11L I)i~CU`+`i1C~i1 ~^ilki J:11'ks,,fl 1l11 PfllftlltCi'l P::Ck, 1f1d ~~.:fC:l:l~?7i ti11I11t11Ci F'rouatns E)li~it•.•.I~•11 ± T11t1ii RCz'Jf I,20 Illllll!(:ti) P llt>I 1C I tlli?flil'.!11l`II l)fIl•.:ii U1yC[1551!I 11 ~)L';tiLiS~tDfl 4. Nlllll EZCgo( minuir,.P ~ (~[l' `3~tll'~ NC~~~i~! :~~(1~tt~~h dili~ ~ I1111'iltlC l1{i~U??Iofl ~\CiJ ~Cr:+te:i ~'U mittiutL,~ Valley L'c;rri;lor I'ro.ico 1711,iatt !?i;~u~;i;•r~ h. ~11ifllla `u.lup ~45 Re',icNe L-f C'L,mprchcii;i%c E'Iaii 1::1emeitL, (Naturul Rcsuutccs. Iiousing, Pnrks aiiJ Rccrcatica+l. l'tilitics. l~~,,u~;n~ic rk:~rl,,prTticntl ~ N1jrur 1t'llllitr inmutcsi :'1Jv:uyx r%Lrnb :ldditionc. Uiscui;,iuri I):+vc %lerricr i.`• -ITtiitiutr~L.; C;tltll4ll O3C:.•k-ffl n 11 D1:c MCfifCf(`1111IiUl:'.~I Lll\ MIlIlI1L:°r Ct1ClliliL'fll.`.; ~)I'.illti~tt}fl 1,r1,•_ Lnlesti othawi.e nutrd aho%e, tlurr Kill be nc% {lubllc rermmrnl~ st C'auucil S1ud% 'w+wun+. I(uticver, i ounril ilwtyi rnena We riqbt to requrst infurmatiua [rom We publk aad styff as xpprupriute. til1T1CE lndlviduils alunn,nf. to anrnd t!►r meet;nR wM requirc rF►riul uscistnncc to vccammaducc ,~l::tr,: t;•a~' ;qc ~~1+ ~ ir•L x; r,l, r,! I.!n(~, nl~ !,:nr, a, HC nul-i: ~'~tac I I I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information X admin. repor# ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report on whether to add additional noise disturbance provisions to the Criminal Code. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Ordinance SVMC 8.25.060 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: When the Council adopted the provisions relating to noise violations on July 14, 2004, it asked staff to look at two additional issues: making the noise regulations applicable on City right-of-way; and regulating blasting to certain hours and days. BACKGROUND: The two potential additions to the misdemeanor noise provisions relate to applying the noise restrictions on City right-of-way, and to limit blasting to certain hours and days. Application to riqht-of-way - The current ordinance (attached for your convenience) states that the noise provisions apply to private property. At the time it was adopted, the police were asking for quick adoption of at least that portion due to numerous noise complaints from citizens, and the police did not have any appropriate enforcement mechanism. In doing so, the Council shelved the discussion of whether to make the same restrictions applicable to noises emanating from City right-of-way. A cflncern is the excessive noise from a number of car stereos. The City has received a number of complaints on this issue. Consistent with other proposed regulatory measures that would affect known groups, staff sent letters to potentially interested groups/entities so we could talk to them and find out if they had particular concerns about the proposed regulation. Staff could not find a particular "car stereo enthusiasts" group to send it to, so we sent a letter to what we believe to be all of the car stereo dealers in the City asking them to relate the message to hobby groups or concerned citizens they may know. Those letters were sent August 27, 2004, and we did not receive any response at all. Police Chief Walker has advised me that he would like to see this implemented. Limitinq times for blastinQ - The current provisions under 8.25.060 state that blasting that is allowed pursuant to Washington law shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Those limitations are A question was raised in early 2004 whether the City could limit the hours in which blasting is allowed beyond those times. Pvly opinion is that the City can change the times in which the activity is allowed, but if the use of #he property includes a land use permit allowing the activity from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., the City cannot change the terms of that contract, particularly to make the conducf criminal in nature. As such, I believe that if vre were to make such a change, rt would only apply to new blasting activity. I also talked to Mack Aguiar from Dept. of Labor and Industries, which is the state regulatory agency for blasting. He advised that the 7:00 to 10:00 period is the industry standard across the state and nation. He further advised that if we were to limit the time for blasting, it would drive up overall construction costs requiring rock because the costs would go up for the mining operations. OPTIONS: Instruct staff to draft amendments to SVMC 8-25-060, or do nothing. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Instruct staff on whether either of these pofential changes should be drafted into a proposed amended SVMC 8-25-060. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None anticipated STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS' SVMC 8.25.060 'CTTk' OF SPUT:AINT VALLrY SFQKANC COUNTY VI'ASHiNGTON ORDINA-NCE NO. 04-030 AiY 012DINMTCE OF 1'HE CITY OT SFOKANF VAI.fLE•1', SPOIC.A-NE COUTTTY V1'ASH]1VG7'ON, TST 4BI.,TSTTDNG NOISE RECULATIONS UNDER THL A117NICII'Ai: CODE FOR THL CITY OF SPOKANF VAT.,LTY, TTTLE SECT1ON 25.060 PEIZTAWIlVC TO NOTST nTSTiJR.BA-NCCS. Wf-IEREAS, ❑oise regulations are necessary to protect the health; welfare and safety of the public; and WHERE.AS, the City Council desires to establish noise regulations uncler lhc Municipal Code to accomplish that goal; NIOW THEREFOR.F, the Ciry Council of the City of Spoltane Valley, Washington, ordains as follows: Scction 1. lnient. The City of Spokane Valley declares that having noise regulations in the Municipal Code are necessary to protect the health, safety and welfare of the public. Tberefore, the intent of this Ordinance is to promote the right to quiet enjoyment of private property within the City. Sectioci 2. \Tvw code provisions on criminal noise regulation. There is e.5tablishetl I.he _ foUowing new Se,ction under Title S, Chapter 25 of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code: 5.25.060 Naise Aisturliance 1. It is unlnwful for any person to make, continue, cause to be made, or to allow to oriSinaie frortt real property in the posssssion of said person, any sdund which creates a noise clisturbaiice. 2. For the purposes of this section; the following sounds are declared to be noise disturbances: . A. Sounds ereated by use of a radio, television set, musical instniment, sound amplifier or any other device capable of producing or reproducing sound, which emanate frequently, repetitively or continuously from any building, struct-Lire or property located within a residential area, and which anjioy or disturb the peace, comfort or repose of a rc~SOnable person of normal sensitivih; B. .Any other sound occurring &equently, repetitively or continuously which annoys or disturbs the peace, comfort or repose of a reasonable person of normal sensiiivity. This 5erctibn shall not apply to noncommercial public speaking and public assembly activitics conducted an any public space or public right-of-way for which a permil has becn obtaioed, Additiqnally; this section shaU not apply to noises producccl by dogs, whiclt is addressed in Spokane Valley Munic;ipal Gode 6.05.070(k)(4). 3. Fxemptions. A. '1'lie following shall be exempt from the pravisions of this chapter: i. Sounds createcl hy motor vehicles when regulated by WAC Chapter j 73-62; ii. Sounds origi►iating frotn aircrafl in flight and souricls that originate at airports whir.h are directly related to flight operations; iii. Sounds createcl by surface carrier engaged in commerce or passenger travel b}, railroad; iv. Sounds created by warning devices not aperating continuously for more than five minutes, or bells, chimes or carillons; v. Sounds created by safety and protective devices where noise suppression would defeat 1he intent Qf the device or is not economically feasible; vi. Sounds creaied by emergency equipment and work necessary in the interest of law enforcement or for health, safety or welfare of the community; vii. Sounds originating &om officially sanetionecl psrades and other public events; viii. Sounds emitting from petroleum eefinery boilers during startup of the boilers; provided, that the startup opcration is peeformed during daytime hours whenever possib]e; ix. Sounds created by watercraft, excepi to the exient that they are regulated by other City or State regulations; X. Sounds createcl by motor vehicles lieensed or unlicensed when operated off public highways, except when such sounds are made in ar adjacent to residential property where human beings . re5ide or sleep; xi. Sounds originating from ex.isUng natural gas transmission ajid distribution facilities; xii. Sounds created in conjunction with public work projects or public work maintenance operations executed at the cost of the federal government, state or municipality; xiii. Sounds created in eonjuilction with the colleciion of solid wastes; xiv. Sounds created in conjunction with milicary pperations or training, xv. Sounds origi.nating from organized ac[ivities occurring in public parlcs, plsygrounds, Umnasiums, swinuning pools, and other public recreational facilities during hours of operation; xvi. Sounds originating from agricultural activities. B. 'T'he following shall be exempt from provisioiis of this chapter bettiveen the hours of seven a.m, and fen p.m.: i. Sounds originating from residential propeiiy rslating to temporary projects for the repair or maintenance of homes, erounds and appurtenances; ii. Sounds createcl by the discharge of firearrns on authorized shooting ranges; iii. Sounds created by blasting; . iv. Sountis created by aireraft engine testing and maintenance not related to flight operatio»s; provided, that aircraf-t testing and maintenance shall be conducted at remote sites whenever possible; v. Soijnds createtl by the installation or repair of cssential utility servicps. C. The following shal! Ue exempt from t:he pi-ovisions of tliis chapter between the hours of seven a.m. and ten p.m., or wlien conducted beyond ane thousand feet of an,y residence «fiere human beings reside end sleep at any hour: i. Sounds originating frorn temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity; ii. Sounds originating frotai forest harvescing and silvicultural activ iry; iii. Sounds originating frorn the quarrying, blasting and mining of minerals or materials, including: but not limited to, sand, gravel, rocf: and clay, as well as ihs pri.mary reduction and processing oi' minerals or macerials for conceete batching; asphalt mixing and rock crushcrs; iv. Sounds originating from uses on properties wllich havc been speci,fically conditioned to rneet certain noise standards by an appropriate Ciry hearing body. 4. Violation - viisdemeanor - Penally. !1ny person violating any of #1.ic provisions of this cliapter shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor. Section 3. Severabiliiv. Lf any section, subsection, sentence or clause oF this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not af7'ect the validit}, of the remaining provisians of this chapter. Section 4. Effective date. 7his Ordinance shall be in full force and effect fve days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of ttte City as provided bY law. Pxssed on this day of July, 2004. ~ ~-4x Ivlayor, Mic ael DeVleming ATT, S. -it},Clerk, Chrisl.i4ainbridge A roved As T ~nrm: , (epuq City At#orney; aryP. DriskeU Date ofPublication: ~~17 ~ - Effective Dace: r,_~:_.-... ne mn panP i nf'a CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: City Manager Sign-0ff: Item: Check all that.apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business X new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Discussion on recreation and aquatics programs GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley -offered summer recreation programs in 2003 & 2004. Staff is considering the program offerings for 2005. Also, the Recreation Coordinator position is cumentfy vacant Staff would like to discuss the possibilities for filling that position. Atso, the City :is currently seeking a qualified operator for the City's three outdoor pools. Staff will provide a brief update. ~ i OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Recreation Coordinator position is funded for 2005 but is currently vacant. The impact on the Aquatics program is not yet known. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson ATTACHMENTS Memo RE: Recreation Programs; Operation of Outdoor Pools ; ~ , S`pokane . ,;,10WVa11ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 # Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallpspokanevalley.org Memorandum Date: January 5, 2005 To: City Council, Dave Mercier, City Manager, Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager From: Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director ~c Re: Recreation Programs; Operation of Outdoor Pools Cc: In planning for the 2005 summer program season, there are some basic organirational issues to consider. This memo is intended io serve as the basis for general discussion on recreation programs and aquatics (outdoor pools) scheduled for City Council on Tuesday, January 25. Recreation Frograms As you are know, the Recrcation Coordinator resigned i.n June 2004. Duc; to the short ti.mefiame, iti was not feasible to fill tktc position prior to the 2004 summer programs. In a pinch; Nve operated the programs uith a se~~anal Recreation Coordinator. This was successful but not without its minor problems. The programs (especially the Day Carup which runs 8 hourslday, 5 daysfweek), require experienced, prafessional oversight on a daily basis. Parents expect, and reasonably so, a h.igh level of professional care for their children. The follo,%ving is a list of the 2004 summer programs offered. In essence, we have successfully operated two seasons of pilot pragrams. Now, I thinl: it is timely to revicw those afferings and consider -Mhere we go from here. Day Camp - Monday- Friday, 8AIV1-5PM for 9 weeks. .4ges 6-] 2 Average 29 children per day. , Play Camp - MondAy - Friday, 9f11vI-Noon for 2 weeks. Ages 3-6 Average 7 children per session Indoor Yla,yground - Monday/Wednesday, 10-11A.M. Ages 4 and undcr Average 22 children per session Free Park Drop in Frogram - Monday-Friday, 9-12 and 1-4 Mission, Edgecliff and Brown's Pazk No registration but estunate 5-6 children per day. Fol.lowing the summer season, I recommended that we leave the Recreation Coordinator position unfilled. The basis of my recommendatian was that we were oFferi.ng programs in the summer ; only and it was dif'fcuh to.justif}, the positian in the "off' season. Now, as we contemplate the " 2005 summer 4eason, it is necessttry to reconsider the filling af this position. In order to deliver a level of eacellence in summer proerams, Ibelieve if rcquires a permanent recreation professional that can bluld yeaj- upan year. However, as noted, experiencc also tells us that the eeonomies of scale do nat support a full time position for summer-anly programs_ Three basic options are ofFered for consideration: 1. Pill the Recreation Coordinator posilion and offer a variety of year-round prosrams. 2. Fill the Recreation Coordinator position. Coutinue existing summer progratns, and utilize the position to assist in the operation or Centerl'lace and other duties. Fill in with ottier programs as may be approved in the future. In either option l or 2, I would seek io fill the posiiian with an i.ndividual qualified in both recreation and aquatics. 3. Leave the position open and put recreation programs on hold uniil forma( long-range plans are adopted. Other Con.sideraiions With the openi.ng of CenterPlace in the fall af 2005; the City will have iLs own space available for recreation programs. If we choose to utilize CenterPlace for "in house" programs vs. space r.ental only; this would further justify the Recreatian Coordinator position. Continuance of our current offerings is not solely Uased on the. Recreation Coordinator position. 'T°he Department also examines the availability of other private and public Froviders. At this time, there are other providers o£Fering sunilar services. The I'arl:s and Recreation iviaster Plan Arill provide valuable insight. I hope to have some preliminary community feedback to sbare at the January 25 meeking. Howcver, the timing is such that we wrill not have a formal plan to guide us for the 2005 season. Outdoor Pools The City has receivcd one response to the 72equest for Qualifications for the operation of its three outdoar pools. T'hat response is from the YivICA. You may recall that the nationally recognized firai of Jeff'Ellis and Associates had expressed strong interest. I-iowever, at the final hour; they . decided lo writhdraw. They stated that thcy felt it would be difficult to secure management ialeni on a seasonal basis. 1 will be requesti.ng a propnsal from the YMCA and will estimate_ the cost of the City operating the program. Also, if Spokane County w7ere to have a change in philosophy, they can still be considered. As you arc aware, the County has indicatcd that they Nvould not operate the City's aquatics programs if they did not also receive the park mainienance contract. I look fnrward to discussing these matiers. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ~ Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent Q old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information (X] admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER DISCUSSION GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N!A BACKGROUND: Even though we are a new city, Spokane Valley has already engaged in many projects and issues that would have benefited from a structured public information program. The attached memo from January 11, 2005 provides some background information, and describes a few altematives for meeting the City's public information and education needs. OPTIONS: Contract with an individual or agency to address the City's public information needs; hire an in-house PIO; or continue with no formal public information program, and address such needs on an ad hoc basis. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide input and direction to staff. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: If Council wishes to begin a formal PIO program, staff would estimate costs based upon Council direction, and return at a later date with a proposed budget amendment. STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS 1. Memo: N,eeting Public lnformation and lnvolvement Needs, January 11, 2005. ~ 400 SjZkane,;oOValley ; 11707 E Sprague Ave Sui[e 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ dcyhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: David Mtrcier, City Manager and Members of Council From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Date: January 11, 2005 Re: Meeting Public Information and Education Needs Even though Spokane Valley is avery young city; we have been involved in many prajecls anci activities for which we ~vould have liked greater public awareness or involvcment. The City does not have a dcdicated public informatinn nfCcer, nor does it have funding allocated for public information, except on a project-specific basis. City employees incorporate basic public inforniation responsibilitics into tlieii- overall project managenlent, and City CounciJ membcrs work indepcndently to achieve Council public uivolvement aims. Th.is memo provide.s background information, and describes a few potential apPrpaches to meet the City's public information and education neecls. Cc►mmunications Transition Committee The topic of communications was assigned to a transitian committce upon uicorporatiqn. "1'hc Transition Coirunittee for Conunuiucalions rcconunencied a Communications Plan be developed so thal the new City could forge a strong relaiionship 'Alth the conununity it serves. 1 he Committee's stated goals of a communications program are to: • Increase awareness, understanding and participaiion of thc citizens of Spokane. Valle_y in City govcrnment goals and activities; • Build communin, pride among citizens and positive identification with their hame city; •Enhance community confidEnce in local govcrnment and its officials - elected and appointed; • Brexl: down feelirigs of Nve-they between City government and the residents of Spokane Valle}; • lucrease awarcness, understanding and participalion of City employees in the_ goals and activities of the City; • l3uild corporate pride among employees and positive identification with City government as a whole; i Meeting Public Informntinn and Tducation Needs, continued 1'age 2 of 3 Jn nuary 11, 2005 • Develop better relationsllips wit11 the news mcdia to enablc them to be two-way cammunicators benween City goveriuvent aiid its tai-get publics; •Eilcottrage Aud facilitate two-way communication as a corporate communications philasophy; aud provide the tools, eraining and methods nccessary to be successful; and • Support a customer-oriented approach to public service delivery tlu'ough implcmcntation of high-nzofile, employcc-driven customer care progranls that provide training; guidelines alld ongoing evaluation of City service delivery, and celebrate the accnmplishmcnts of cmployees. lhe Commietee also rccommended a Communications Dcpartment for dle Cit}7, in order to provide leadership and expertise. However, tlie Commit2ee did not reconinend an arganizational stnicture for the Department or a specific staffing level. Pubiic Ini'armation Activitics Following are same rcpresentative samples of public infonnation activities, whieh coulci be carried out by a public relations firm, by an indiviclual contractor or by a City ecnployee. They are taken from job descriptions of various local governmeni public information officcrs in Washington, and are not in any parlicular order. • Aclvise City Manager, senior management And City Council on public information policies and issues; • Plan, develop, coord'ulate and prpduce public information products, includi.ng brochurES, faci sheets, news releases, audiolvisual programs; official newsletter, web site and otller informational, educational and promotional materials; • Develop and 'unplement strategic communication plan to increase citizen awaeeness of City prograns; and citizen participation in City's decision-making process; • Managc the clissenunatian of prompe, accurate emergency public infonliation duruig etnergency and disaster situations • Serve as a corporate source of information about thc City Not all ofthe items may be appropriate for Spokane Valley, ancl there may be some important ieems that shotild be added. I-Iowever, if the City decides to movc forward with a public inCorniation plan, the above list could provide d foundation for a scopc of work Public Information Providers There are three basic categories of professional public infonnatian providcrs: a public relations/marketing Firm; an individual contractor or a City employee. Staf'f has not done an in-depth analysis of the costs of each; liowever; following is an initial cstimate, along with pros and cons af tlie three categorics. Please note that the estimates ao not include llle cr.ist o1' ; Meeting !'ublic Informatian anc) Lclucation Needs, continued Page 3 of 3 Januar}' 11, 2005 cilaterials, supplies and services, such as printing or publisliing. 1"he City would incur those costs regardless of'thc provider. .Prtblic relrttions/nrarketing firm. A AR/marketing firm o.ffers a pool of professional staff; ,Arith a vaiiety of skills to draw from. I-Iowever, Spokane Valley may be a "small fish in a hig pond," and the City's account may not be a high priority. Dcpending upon the firni's Cargeted client base, conflicts of interest may arise. Contracts could be set up on a project basis, a retainer basis, car an hhurly rate basis. The City could expect to pay arpund $75 - $175 per hour, depending upon the task. A lower hourly rate may be negoiiated if the City is using a project or a retainer basis. 1►tdividua/ Cotrtractor. An individual contractor provides professional skills and experience. He or She may not have the complete skill set offered by a PR firm, anci subcontracting may be an option for areas outside the person's expertise. A.n individual contractor may have experience nlore directly applicable to a public sector envu•on.ment, ~<<hich woulci be helpful if'the Ciry is looking for gcneral advice and counsel 'vi addition lo project-spccific work. Ai1 individual contractor lil:ely has a smaller client base than a I'R firm; so die Ciry's account is likely to be a higher priority. DePending uPon hislher otlier clients, conflicts of interest may arise. Conti-acts could be set up on a project basis, a retainer basis, or an hourly ratc basis. Staff doesn't have an estimated cost for au individual contraceor, but the hourly rate is likely to be less t.han a Public RelationslMarketuig Firm. Ciry Ln:ployee. Thc City emplovee aud individual contraetor approachcs are similar. Perhaps the biggest difference is tliat an employee's work time would be dedicated to the City; so confliet of interest wauld not be an issue. StafPs itutial estimate of a PIO salary is about $50,000 pe.r year for a fuU-lime employee. The additional costs of an employee, such as medica] insurance and other benefits and roll-ups, cotne tA about 30%. This would bring . the total estimaced cost to arotmd $65,000. 1-Iowever, a more complcte analysis is needed. Other ConsideraNuns If the City Council wauld like to proceed with a publie infonnation approach, there are other considerations as «=ell. An:uurrt of Work. The City has enough public information and education need to employ a full-tune Public .I.nfonnation 0fficer, or to contract with an individual or agency for that equivalent amount of work. To the eatent that the City Council «rishes to take a phased approach, the work plan woulcd nced to be careCully prioritized. Btedget Ijttpact. A proposed budget amendtnent woulcl be included as part of the package. Firs•1 Steps. 'I'he City woulcl issue a REquesl for Qualifications as the first step in selecting a public relations firui or individual contractor. The first step to ]iiring an eiuployec would be to develop a job description and place the position on the City's classification plali. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ c4nsent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing C) information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: CORE VALUES PROJECT APPROACH AND TIMELINE GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council worked with the Planning Commission to create a draft vision for the upcoming Comprehensive Plan. BACKGROUND: The vision proposed for the Comprehensive Plan, once finalized, describes what the community should be in 25 years. It provides a framework for the policy issues identified in the Plan. The draft vision is: Spokane Valley - a communrty of opportunity where families and individuals can grow and play, and businesses wi!l flourish and prosper. The core values provide the context for addressing those policy issues. Clearly defined values i' will help the City identify what issues are the highest priority, and what strategies can best be used to help the community achieve its vision. Having clearly defined values will also help the City Council balance competing demands as it makes policy decisions. The purpose of this agenda item is to agree upon an approach and timeline for defining the core values associated with the Comprehensive Plan. The City Council and Planning Commission are scheduled for a joint meeting on February 1, 2005 to discuss the core values. The Community Values & Mission of the Town of Blacksburg, VA are attached as an example. Spokane Valley may or may not want to include the same level of detail in its definition of values, but it gives an idea of the types of things that could be included. . RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide inpu4 and direction to staff. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS 1. Community Values & Mission of Blacksburg, VA 1 ~ ACCachment 1 COMMUNITY VALUES & MISSIUN Community Values Thcre are majiy values held by the nlacksburg community, each reflected in the unique eharacter of the town. Citizens have indicated their high level of satisfaction with thc "quality of life" 131acksburg has to offer. Quality of life is defined by a variery of factors such as education, recreation, and natural or cultural features that are unique to a communiry. Quantitative information including economic . indicators, vital stacistics and population data, education and health figures, and other demographic data from the U.S. Bureau of the Census describes pan of the quality of life of an area. The opinions and experiences of the community embody the essence of the tocal quality of life. Quality of life is determined by the values of a cflmmunity. Tn order to maintain or improve overall quality of Iife, these underlying community values must be maintained and respected. The following are key community values of'the citizens of Blacksburg . Small towv feeVatmosphere - Small town feel and ahnosphere has consistently been ranked high by the citizens as they identify what they like most ahoui living in Blacksbucg. Like quality of life, snBll town feel cannot be easily quantified. The following items have been identified by citizens as contributing to Blacksburg's small town atmosphere: people sre friendly and you ' know your neighbors; a comfortable, relaa:ed attitude; a fceling of security and a low crime rate; the beauty of the natural ~5 environment; the presence of good schools and public services; communiey - _ ~ festivals and fairs; a traditional, historic , ~ - . downtown; a feeling of high citizen commiement to 1he community; managed r.. growth and development; convenient eceess throughout Town; a pedestrian oriented Downtown; an easy going Frgure CV-1, Downtown lifestyle; an attitude of conservation and Blacksburg strong recycling program; pride in our history; an attractive communiry appearance with rnany flowers and gardens in both publie and private spaces. NoWember 27, 2001 Blacksburg 2046 1 Community Valucs & Mission . Natural surroundings and oPen space - Residents place a high value on natural open spaces and the views of the surrounding undevelopsd mountains. Protection of streams, natural vegeiacion, ope.n spaces, and scenic Wiews will preserve this natural bcaucy for the enjoymcnt of future generations. Attractivc cammunity appearance and cleanliness - One ofthe characteristics of Blacksburj that residents and visitors i-ecognize on a daily basis is the cleanliness and appearance of the town. The citizens place a high priority on beautifjring their environment through landscaping, plantings in median strips, hanging baskets downtown; street sweeping, washing of downtowm sidewalks, and well maintained homes and businesses. Qpen Goverriinent - T'he Blacl:sburg communiry prides itself on the high ]evel of eiiizen input and community involvement. Key issues facing the toNvn are evaluated in op$n, public meetings. All major public meetings are televised on . , the towm's public access ~ television stacion. Towm ' ~governmment works hard to be responsive to citizen - needs and to be customer focused, as evidenced by iLs Figure CV-2, Blackshurg Publle Aleetirrg E-government initiatives. There are many active civic groups including the League of Women Voters, the Neighborhood Federation, and the To,%&rnscape Committee, which are activc in community affairs. The to«m is fiscally sound as demonstratcd by low taxes, a divcrse revenue stream, a high bond rating, and reasonable user fees - all oi' these supporting high quality serviees. Community parhierships - Many community partnerships have developed and have had a prafaund effect on communiry aetivities and facilities. Tourn-communicy parmerships have contributed their resources to projects such as renewing the L_yric Theater, the Hand-l.n- Hand Playgrowid, downtown streetscape improvements, and renovations and imprvvements to the Blacksburg branch library. Partnerships 6ave also provided gazebos in Town parks, lights at soccer fields, and have prormted activities such as the town-s Christmas Parade, the annual Steppin' Out Festival, and Fourth of July fireworks. . November 27, 2001 , filacksburg 2046 2 Communicy Values fi Mission -Public Safcty - Citizens of ~ Blacksburg value the safety of ttr communiry and iLs low crime rate. People can walk safely at night and,,enjoy a pleasant Dov%mtown without "u1neC-Clty" problems. A safe Figure CV-3, Police Cur living environment contributes to [he averal] quality of life in Blacksburg. Quality land development - High qualih° land development is demanded by 131ackshurg citizens. Developtnents that preserve open space and natural features are more attractive to residents and help to protect natural areas for the enjoyment of future generations. ln a survey on the quality of development in Town, citizens provided opinions on what characteristics represent high quality development and what represents poor quality development. Exterr,ive and mature landscaping was t}he most f.requent example of niDh qualit}, development in both residential and commeraial areas. In residential arzas citizens also prefer large areas of open space, maintenance of natural streams, recreational facil.ities, sidewalks, and high architectural quality. In commercial areas, the community prefers shared parking for businesses, sidewall:s, street lighting, high architectura) quality, limited signs; and landscaped parking areas. Charactcristics that represented poor development include clearing of natural vegetation, orrstreet parking, too much or too ]ittle exterior lighting, large eapwises of asphalt, and large dominant structures. iModerate cost of living - Citizens of Blacksburg enjoy the moderate regional cost of living. 'fhe communiry is provided with many of the amenities of a large population center, but in an affordable small town atinosphere without "big-city" problems. Varied employment opportunities - The community places a high value on varied employment opportunities. Blacksburg and its surraunding communities ~ _ ~ rr = , - - provide various opporfunities to work in a stable economic Q,. environment. There is also interest in amacting new industry to Town. Technology oricnted, clean, noirpolluting industries providing training and Figure CV-4, Corpurute ReseurcH skilled jobs are targeted. November 27, 2001 B]ack;bure 2046 3 Community VRlues & N4ission , Planned gro-vvth and developmenE - Citizens strongly support long range planning for the future growth and development of the tokNm. The communiry expects the town to anticipate aiid plan for futurE opportunities and problems. A proactive approacll helps Che community avoid fufure difficulties and pnepares citizens and Town ofticials to de_velop proper solutions when problcros do arise. Recreational opportunities - Citizens value the variety of recreational opportunities available as il]ustrated by che strong citizen involvernent on the Recreation Advisory Board. Boih fornial programs and informal recreational ~ opportunities exist to satisfy almost everyone's needs. nce tOR'n SpOnSOi'S variOUS Flkure CV-5, l1'e![te's Crrre Park • youth and adult sports leagues as well as norrat}iletic recreational activities. Farks and playgrounds are scattered throughouc Town, and surrounding areas such as Brush Mountain, thc New R.iver Trail State Park, and the Appalachian Trail provide a variety of autdoor recreationa) opportunities. A diverse community - One of the primary reasons Blacksburg is a special plac,e to live is the diversity of its citizens in age, nationality, religion, race, and ethnicity. The to«il has citi2ens f.rom all over the world as the university atvacts ou~5tanding professionals and siudents from across the state and country, as well as abmad. This diversiry is seen as a very positive element that makes Blacksburg a great placc to live, work, and eonnect with the various cultures found around the world. Intellectually stimulating environment - Blacksburg is a progressive community, _ r' • in an intellectually stimulatitig environment. Tts citizens place education and scholarly thought in high esteem. The presence of a major university also brings 131aeksburg Flgure CV-rS, f3urruss, Virginia Tech international and etllnic November 27, 2001 Blacksburg 2046 4 Community Values & A4ission diversity, an atcitude that is conducive to chanee and new ideas, a ~ ereater environmental consciousness, access io innovative technology, and a diversity of cultural activities and the arts whieh are not generally found in small towns. A quality public school system adds to this intellectually stimulating community. Suund financial management - Cilizens demand thnt the town sustains a sound financial condition at all times. Sound fnancial condition may be defined as ihe cown's ability to pay bills, annually balance the hudget, pay future costs, and provide needed and desired services. Sound financia] condition requires flexibilit), that ensures the town is in a position to react and respond to ahanges in the economy and new service ehallenges without measurable financial stress. T`his also requires adherence to the best accounting and management practices, which means conformance with generally accepted accounting procedures as applied to governmental units. The town has adopted a sct of finqncial principles that it follows. These principles require an annual balanced budget, guidelines for che funciing of operating costs, guidelines for financial planning and reporting, guidelines for the eperation ef enterprise funds, and a recommendation That the town maintain a bond rat'tng of A or berter. A full listing of these financial principles can be found in the Town of Blacksburg Annual Budget - Citizen Involvement - Citizen participation in public affiairs is a key component of the Blacksburg community. The high participation rate of citizens on variqus authoriYies, boards, c4mmissions, committees, and task forces is a strong indicator of citizen involvement This hiSh level of citizen participation demonstrates that Blacksburg citiz,ens are concerned about the community's well being and are determine.d to be actively involved 'n crsating a better and strongcr future. Over 300 citizens are actively involved in more than forty authorities, boards, commissions, committees, and task forces that are either appointed by Town Council or recognized by Council for their participation in Blacksburg's local government initiatives. Thc Downtown Aclvisory Group (DAG) is an example of one these committees and includes citizens, elccted officials, and Town staff. Thc purpose of the group is to help strengthen the economic diversity, cultural integrity, and aesthetic appeal of Dovmtown Blacksburg. Their efforts have led to the development of a llowntown ivlaster Plan, an economie development corporation: and improved.joint planning wich Virginia Tech NovemUer 27, 2001 lilacksburg 2046 5 Community Values & ilvfission t..,.:MlSS1OI1 Town of Blacksburg The gowernment of the Town of 131acksrurg exists to promote anct sustain a superior quality Qf life in Blacksburg. In partnership with the community, Town staff pledges to deliver cost effective services in a personal, responsive, and innovative manner. The Government ofBlack.sburg Values: ❖ Citizens as customers, deserviug the highest quality of services delivered by a local government Encouragement of progressive thinl:ing through employee involvement and teamworlc Fairness, intcgricy, wid trust as essential qualities of ethical govcrnance An open, accessible government, where citizen involvement is vital . A community renowned for its beauty and cleanliness ~~1 Talcing pride and achieving the highest quality in all we do Positive liaisons with local governmental organi7ations Flchievement of a positive solution to every problem People as our most imporcant resource Responsibility and accountability Fublic safety for all cicizens Evcry citizen contact is an opportunity to demonstrate thess values. ~ . Novernbe:r 27, 2001 alscksburg 2046 6 Communit}, Vnlues & Mission CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business X public hearing ❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA 1TEM TITLE: Valley Corridor Project Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At the February 3, 2004 the Council requested SRTC to model traffic for the Couplet Project. At the joint Council/Planning Commission meeting on February 23, 2004 three couplet alternatives were selected for further study by Public Works staff. At the April 6, 2004 Council meeting option 2A was presented to Council and the decision was made to suspend further study on that option. BACKGROUND: Public Works has been working with SRTC over the past year to develop traffic models for the various Valley Corridor options. SRTC has used three different software models and is currently in the process of implementing the VISUM model. Although the model is not complete, SRTC has sent a letter to the City stating the following: While there will continue to be improvements to the model incorporating new growth patterns east of Sullivan and more refinements in a around the Valley Mall area, there are certain findings that continue to remain the same regardless of the model improvements. The analysis continues to indicate there is a lack of sufficient growth in traffic volumes in the South Valley Corridor that would warrant additional capacity beyond the seven lanes that currently exist on Sprague Avenue. Forecasts indicate the traffic volume would be approximately 1,500 to 1,600 vehicles per hour in 2025 compared to 5,000 vehicles per hour capacity. Attached is a letter from Inga Note, PE, Acting Traffic Engineer for Spokane Valley, a memo from Bob Brueggeman, PE, Assistant County Engineer, and an excerpt from a recent traffic access revisian request at Pines and Sprague from a local engineer in Spokane Valley. These documents discuss concerns with SRTC's volume capacity on Sprague and the current and future capacity of the Pines and Sprague intersection. Public Works has notified SRTC that we are concerned with the results in the current traffic model and that we request SRTC c4ntinue to evaluate the roadway capacity of Sprague Avenue and proposed Couplet altematives. OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACT10N OR MOTION: BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten ATTAC H N1 ENTS Letter from Glenn Miles, Transportation Manager, SRTC, dated December 21, 2004. Letter from Inga Note, PE, Acting Traffic Engineer, dated January 5, 2005 Merno from Bob Brueggeman, PE, Assistant County Engineer, dated Dec. 7, 2004 Access Revision Request at Riverside and Pines (page 9 & 10) dated Dec. 22, 2004 , r , ~ , - . ~ Spokane Valley r , , - . . _ - _ - - - ~ ~ - - - , . f Corri " dor Proect History A Draft Environmental Assessment by the County, May 17, 20020 • Brainstorming meeti n9 with Spokane CSTA, SRTC, Spokane Valley on Dec. 5, 2003 0 . • Council/Planning Commission mt9. on ]an. 15, 20045 , . . . . . . Pnge 2,.: : Valley~ Corridor Pro ject : - 1/18/05 , - , _ . History (cont.) e The Council reauested SRTC to model traffic for the Couplet on Feb. 320040 • Council/Planning Commission mt9, on Feb. 23, 2004. Selected options 2, 5& 2A for further consideration. o City Council Public Hearing on option 2A on April 6. Decision to delete option 2A. Page: 3- Valley Corridor. Pro jecf 1/18/05 Couplet Options 1. Transition existing Appleway back to Sprague Ave. (2-way) east of U n iversity 2. Extend existing Couplet (Appieway eastbound, Sprague westbound) to Sullivan 3. Extend Appleway 2-way east of University, leave Sprague 2-way 4. Return Spra ue to2-way, change/extend Appleway . to 2-way wit I i m ited a ccess 5e Extend Appleway 1-way east to Sullivan, existing couplet and Sprague as-is ZA. Extend Appleway 1-way east to Sullivan, Sprague 1-way west w/ frontage road east Pnge 4.~. Vnlley Corridor Pro ject 1/18/05 ` , Valley Couplet ✓~pt~on 1 Transition Existing Couplet Back to 2-way Sprague East of University ~ ~ _ ~ 1 - i =4 • ' i ~ i , T ,L= ~ I I: ~-t-t .i I ~ i , I ~ }u- ~ -,~~~li I~~ 1~~ - • J~T f - ~lii i~ ;I'((`r.• ~~~I ~ s {_-uJ ~ ~ 11 ~ If ~i~ ~ -~Iti~l, i I j ~_is.t_.~t ~i~~~ - t f ~ L i . ' ~ ,~u • ~ ~ i,i~ ' tl~ r t • ^ _ _ i ~ ; _ , ;~~I l, -•i~ ~ i~+~~il7, 7,7 1 ~ I 'I i! Ti;'j' r~ I~ 1 1 i C~-~ ' k ~ ~ i~. ~ i I•I?' i~ i' ~ ~1 I ~.l'~ ~ ~ I~~ ~i"'-'~ i~_ 'F=~ - C. ~ t_1_-1;1' Ei 1(~~a!~ ~ ~ ,I L,` - r a~ 1' I~ r r~ t ~ i~ n•- ~ t i,t ~ ' i.~ ~ ; 1'• L.i , g~', i t1 .r pi_ P,_ , , . t'~ i i= ~ ~iI~'_1 I ' I ~ ~ _ill ~ __a~l( ( - ' r' ~ , - ~ ~ i _r I'~ ~ Dj -L -I ' - , I ►Py ''~I` .~I ~ .~~j, ~-~-C~~'~~ ~,I ~~,~1 ,I~~ II •aTr+ ~i~~, ~ • ~ ~ ~ I illl~~ ~ II~~ I ' ~ , i ~ - i L7.-...F 11 ;1Ito ~1 T(~ Y ~ I _ ~ \ ~l ~'P"~ C^I 7i i i' it'. t 4 ~1~ 1'~ ~ I ~.ill-, I I • : L ' _I~ I = . I, li ~ I_.1 II 1II i _'~I~' ~ ~ 'I I - -~~f• ( -~.1L l ~ -i-' ~ ~III' ~ 't' ~ 4ll 1 'I. . 1 A11J1 ~1. . ~ ~I~~1 i~• I x ~~I I _1` 1 h ^-r 1~ 1 ~ ~I'+ ~~~~i 1 IIIIIII 7L,4 I. 11;- ~ 41I j _ ~ 9 ~ ' •I ~ lt 'ti_I - I L ~ I _ 'I ; _ _ ' _ 1 ' 1~}-,. t,+~ -I T { l "f~ i r • ~ P ~i~ ~.ii~~ - J'j ~ i~ iSUMPTI0N5: Sprague: Construd Medlans (remore cenber left tLrn tane). Mtd-bbdc U-turns allowed. LEGEND• Irrtersedbn improvemenb required. ' C~ Gtty oi Spokane Yaky :ONSIIDERATIOft1S: CONSIDERATIONS: l~ray Fastbound ~ Reduce Accidents * No Free Left Tums to Existing Businesses ooo~oooooooooooooE i-way WestSound ~ Avaid Right-of-way Takes * Minimal Side or Rear Street Access to Praperties ~ i•way Tramc = Better Aaommodate Light Rail * Intersectian Level of Service "F' 0 Inbersedion'Improvements ` Preserves Future Couplet Riqht-of-way * Expensive for Intersection Improvements `Facuses Development on Existing Couplet - Right-of-way Purchases ` Potential Bypass Around Future nevelopment * Traffic Accidents k Improved Ernergency Access * Not Pedestrian Friendly ~ * Need TIB Approval Ga~~c scn~ S~~e sooo eo:o 4ooo * No Room for Landscaping %lle3 f taeb - 20001L PUBLIC WOAIL9 OEPJIR7MEIfl Valley Couplet - Option Z Extend Existing Couplet to Sullivan (Phase II & III) I i. - ' 1' a 'fn , ' ~ ~ ~ ; _ = ~K a ~ 1~__'i -~r~`I' 1• ~ ~ni~u'rt _ n - ~ n-- i- ' r . - t M, i J=L' ~f(~~_' ~ 1 ~.~A • ~ _ ,~1: t l~~~-~~ ~ r .I' ~ - - _I _ II.~ T' _ i~ i - - l~"'} .1 ~1 - , i~~' ` I_ i "T ~ - 1~ r - `~.j :~l u '~.I ~ G .~1 - tI ..~-L 1~ - }i ~I~~ '1~ -'1 ! 1 J~._i f j~ •ISl I' II~~iI T ~if-T ~ a _ a. . k _L- - a -S. i~L l_ Y ~I ~ =r~ , ~ f~~' ~ t , ~ ' ~ ir t i I ~ ~ ~ - ! - ~ • ~I ~ ! ~ i~i .1~ I -.IL_ I.L_ S ~ ~ ~ ~ I~' ~ a,~~ I~! I~ ~I~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ' • ~ i ~ ' ~.,,,.,z-l~~- ~ 1 i- IL , J•.ILirr'r~u~-' ~ ~ tti: t 71' f~l f ; 1r < rrk °~~Y --i -1 .~,I i- ~ Ia a N.~ .I i +-II i i, 'll, n d T L 3 I _ _ _i 1 IJ~ ~ ~ _ ~i ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ; T - i I I i L il I~ I1IP ~ L; ~t ~ ~ i i •i i , ~ ~ i , r I ~ ~ I ~ ~ I i .I , - - ~ T _i~IIII II I!~ ~ ~I ~7i~~ + ';~ni, I' ~ - ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ I' I ~ ` ~I at 1 'I'') • r~~ .i 1 ~ F+ I4~ riI~~ }1-1 A '^1i •rll~ ~ f , _ ~.T.'1 j -lll~ i rl i~ JI .~t r,~li,~,{~~~'~} ~~~i In ~;.1! .r-t d _ur~ , _ 1 i" --t V rf I 1 I .l. ~Ll,l 1 1 i. ~~t~,-+.~Y .Ifi-' ^ F I II . . ~ "y~'~~• `J 4~ i'~1~1 ~ I 'L 4<1! 1 ~ I 1 J ..~e. IT •1 '1~ ; i.j i L~f(1~ 't1'i. IN ~t U. I~ .~1 •~I. I. h'i ~1 ~ e~- ~ ~'~i- - ~ I i ~ ~ ~ J L i. i~-t, -l---~ I•~~~ . f ' f f~f~,1'~ . ' : _ ' x 1.. .1..~ ~ - _ _L 9 f ,~I~V„',, , ! ` • ~ ~ s,~~ 1'~:1, a' j 4' i I ~ ,Ilfl.: ~i ~r ' ~ E.. ~ --I ' • - - - ~ a ~ ! I IfN tili'~ n! I r Ll- - i. L~ •~I. ~ T r , Li-~' i- Jb iSUMPTIONS: Sprague: i-way with Iartdscaping. APpleway: i-way. Crouaver etroeb between Sprapue end Appleway induded, but not indaded tn TIB tundtng. LEGEND: TIB grartt tunding already approved. Clry of Spokane Yalley i-way Eastbound :ONSIDERATIONS: COIdSIDERATIONS: 1-way we.stbound ~ Higher Capacity * Difficult far Light Rail East of University ` Safer for Vehicles * More Cross-street Access Points - Potential Collisions = Improves Pedestrian/8ike Safety vs. 2-way * Business Impacts ` Business Impacts ~ Improves Intersection Air Quality 'TIB Grant Funds Available 5,,,,~,~~~ • Allows Room for Landscaping CRAPHIC SCALE , `Valley l~ J t Lzb - 2~oWt X2~wviaid oEPAATIlEN1 Valley Couplet(-)ption 3 Extend Appleway 2-way East of University 1~ TJ~iT 1.s 11tD.. ~ - ~ ~I~. yy~IIl.~~,•~ 1 ' 1 ~ - ` ,.I' -t, I I- -F- ~ 'tl• ~ _ rI 1~" 't~ i teoo ~I , 1n .F ~L.1 ~ ~ {r r L ' • 1 7 -~r . _ ; ~1 t i , j.. L T. ~BIOa jc' QN -~-r I" ri ':~tlI I. i' 1' I L -j' LF - ,T-^ fl_ =~==~r- - I I~i• .i~~ -Y ~ •i~r( ~I~rl 'r~ll f?r:Ilr f ~ I1~ d~1 ~ 1 ~ ~ .u.. ~ ` 1 ~ 1 . ~ i 1~.. ~ ~ _ + •1 ~I - ~ ` ,rl ~ V~ t'I {~11~t~u -4-_t t i~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ - i_ _ . _ 41 I V.1 ~ L r,. _ r 11 L r' : I _i~ y~ ~ i an j 1 _ , ~ _i, •i , I 1" _ ~ 3 ~ ~ - lE`N C I ~'~'^i^ ' -1~~I _ ' j ~il 1 9TH7 ~ •+r~ ~u I I U : k'1:°e~- ~ - i . ~ I ~ 1 I ~ i _'i~.~ ~ j ~ ~ y ' ~ ~ + ~ , ~ ~ ' • ~.}j ~ ~ ~ a , - 1 ~ 'i','1 i - , i- - I • r I ~ . J l_ 4 777 1F ,i Iri- ct: ,U ~i- ~1 • ' - - i. H 11~ I F~I`1~.•-+a8. ~'1'• f-.}:~ rf~- - I ~ ~ I ~ ~(.11 . '~1~... .T,:,~ -~-j.. li ~ . - ; 1-•-~I ~ .--i~,i~ I I i-- ~ i . ti y 1 - ~ I . - ' ~ tl' 1 'I ' ~1 - - i 'F - ~ ~ 1 • ~ ~ + _ , - _ . ~ • ~ ~ ~ _ I r - _ - ~ I - l,~ L _ ~ I,; 1! t-- = 3 I ~ _ t 1 i~ .t ~ i~' ~ •r l:~_ I~~-If- ' i i~' t,~~ ' ;a { -.I T iSUMPTIONS: Sprague: 2-way east of University. Appleway: 2-way east of UnMersity. Extended to Sultitiran, LEGEND: Light Rafl median operation. Gity of Spokane Vafley Existing ocuplet rerttains. 1-way Eastbound 1-way We~tbound ' O~1SIDER~ITIOR~S: CONSIDERATIONS: ~ 2~Way Tra~ ~Better Access to Properties * Reduces Traffic Safety ~ Tmproves Small Business Access * Expensive `Provides Greater Capacity vs, all Traffic on Sprague * Property Access Inhibits Light Rail * Land-use Pressure to Zone Commercial * Increased Delays at Major Intersettions rsnVll~l l ll. CRAPHIC SCALE SP ;oAVal_1.e3 I tmb ° 2mr PUBIit IHOAKL DEPART14E1f1 Valley Couplet - Option 4 Return Sprague and Appleway to 2-way .n 5r1 . u.,:~:. • 1 ' I 111 ~ t- ~ _ ~ '1~ ~ ~ t lL ~ I _ ' < i' ~ w ~ ~ y --G S. i ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ • 1 - t 4111 u ~ ~'141 j;,y ~ L fl ;1 y~;";~ - ~ :~...t~~ ;I ~ _4 ~ i'r- ~'.'"1. 1~ .I~-I - ` ~ F~ u.. p~•-~}'r's --il.i I ~~i~, - ~~f~~• 1 EI 'i~ :I ,;r~' I~! i-'8- ~n-tt'i ~~iEl ;•I;t II' - i, n ~~I f`_;'~!~ ~ I ~r~i-=~ ~ I.~i - I ~ i ~ JJ' 3: ~ ~ +I~I ~:i!! ~,i; 'h l~4 r_ :•h~~ - J i' - 'L - - i ~i.* ~ -.'.~~ll I r i i ii `~-I h •I.li 7r Tl". 1:~ ti, r ~ 1 1, 'r . ~ f Lb ' • IE tT ` i't . 1'J ~:iF~I J I _.G__ ~ ~i _J~ 1 • ~y~~ ii ~ l I - ~ .J; ~ - -j- l~ - • - T.4 -.u. -i4 I t ~ . I I~ I ~ ~ . i. i r. ~I .{11~ ~ 1 ~41.~~~ ' _ ' ~ - ,~:1 f ~ I~~' 1 ? ~.I_.1_ S T- EL J I I ~ • i I I'~~ ' ~ -I ' '1ti' , ~ r `'ti ~ , I-T I~a di i ~ r~ ~ ~ il~ .J}I i'~'~ "hl ; *14 r~ul~. 1 . . 7 1 .f,, ~~t ~ . 1: A - "t rt, . Mf :I11 ~ V ' ~ t.:'•' . i~ "i _ I_9~1 ~ ~ I~ ~ = -i 1 i '!.9'1 j 11" ,tltl~~ I. ~ ~ ~ e~'; ' , 17 't rt~ ~=z ~L{ 31.~7 ' _ ~ ! ~ , ~ I ` . ~ ; ~5{ = I . T 1 ~ I - ' t ~ I ( ~y I ~ , ~•t- ' _ ~ _ _ i1.,_ ~ 4'~' •;I ' ! ' - I I ~ a 7.~ r ~ ~ ~ ~11 ' ~ r ( 1~~I ~ i .~`t' _ i .i. ~,=i1. - ~u; ' } ~i-`..I ~ ~ ~ t ~'i(i ~ ~ ~~t ~ C F . i• a. ! L . ~~~~i, t t. ' r 1. ~1. _ ~l - SSUMPTIONS: Sprague: 2•way. Appleway: 2-way. limited axess, medium speed. LEGEND: Extended to Suillvan. Gity ot Spokane Val.bey ~ 2•way TraH'ic Limited Aocess Medium Speed CONSIDERATIONS: CONSIDERATIONS: k l3etter Access ta Properties * Cost to Convert Couplet to 2-way ~ Improves Smali Business Access * Reduces Traffic Safety ¢ Pravides Greater Capacity vs. all Traffic on Spi-ague * Expensive * Properly Access Inhibits Light Rail * Land-use Pressure to Zone Commercial C~„O~n/'e~ Delays at Ma)or Intersections GAAPEiIC SCALE '~N . 1CF0 e,00 Va11e3 I Immli = zXCR vusU FICSOEPARTNEN1 Valley Couplet Ciption 5 Extend Appleway 1-way Eas# of Universifiy ~ .r_ I, k~t~ ~ ~ • ~ r. ~ r i _ ~ - ~ t, f s~~- , , ~ ~ ~ It-• - i I •~f- - - r ~ ~ ~ - , , , It ' I Ilt 11 I~ :...i , 4 ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~'.I JALUT E ~ A'``I~~~. ~ ~ ~ il ~ .4! ~ ~•1 , -ii ~ Ir - +Ic,' _ ~i .Y " ~ `l j I 'i nti I -y ~ _ _ ~ . 1 ~6_ I i~i..V . I•J. ~~5{!~ ' - _ i i - t ~ ~ • ~ J I. _r 1 ; raou I, ' ,►M,'~ I% F,'. +14 I il. ~ f f^i i~• i i I'~j r~i~ ! ~ I f ~ C I, l i i' ~ I ~ I~,4TN i~~ h 9~ i' I i r i - --J I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L! 1 I''~ ~-'~,I~~II I~I~', ~ ~rr~l~ ~~k., ~ ~ ~lII'~ r'll ~ ~i '~t'~ : j'~ ~ ~ji~i ~ r.. • I~ _ I ~ ~ I~ I.11I,p -]-.:-t' t 77. '~~r ~11 (i ~.7'~1 ' ` li- 'l1i ~'1~ ' r 7 1.T~ • P,,}.- I 7 L +~s_.~j ' L' - ~ x~ i I• ,1' t..t i ll ~ ~i ~ _ _ - I, 1, ' r , t_ ~ I~ ~ . ~ L ~ i _ t'~ ~ i ; ~ ~ , i • ~ ,-1 ~ i~ j_ I A Y / I ~ ~ ' , - „j.~., ~ 1 I~- ► ~I'I ~ -.II- '~'I i._ ~ i iSUMP'TIONS; Sprague: 1-way west of University, 2-way east of Universaty. Intersectoon improvements requlred. Re-stripe far 4 westbound, 2 eastbound, center tanes. LEGEND; Appleway: i-way. City of Spokane Yafley Extended to Sutlivan. ~ Z-way Traffic i-way Eastbound :ONSIDERATJ[ONS: CONSIDERATIONS: .~..E 1-way Westbound ~ Reduces Accidents * Distance from Light Rail to Commercial Corridor ` Improves Eastbound Traffic * No Improvement to Westbound Traffic ` BettEr Accommodate Light Rail * No Room for Landscaping ` Improves Emergency Access * Need TIB Approval ~ Provides Bypass Around Future Developmerit * Increases Collision Potential ~ Provides Eastbaurul Bypass Around I-90 Problern Areas GRAPHiC SCAI.E m' Reduced Intersection Improvenient Costs '~C° ;00 VA I I m.b - "OK MBLIC WORKS DWA,RTNENI .-•-r---,...r--~-.-.-. T__, c_ - -f"' r . _ . _ _ ■ ~ ■ , Pu'blic Opin,ion ; ,;r-----,r-, , . . ; . ] : . ~ I . ~ ` . . . . . - - - ~ . _ . ~.s: . . . . :'__.r:•.::::•.:: , . . . . , Do you agree or disagree that the Sprague/Appleway ~ couplet has been a useful improvement to the overall roadway system in Spokane Valley? Would you say you... 173 Responses : Strongly disagree 21 Somewhat disagree 6 Neither agree nor disagree 16 Somewhat agree 48 75% A9ree , Strongly agree 82 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 . . . . : . : _ : - . ` Page 11 = ' :Ualley Corridor Pro~ect' 1/18/05 ~ - - - - How supportive would you be of the Appleway section of the couplet being extended east past University Road? Would you 5ay you... 177 responses. ~ Strongly oppose 30 Somewhat oppose 13 Neither support nor oppose 19 Somewhat support 37 _ 65% Agree Strongly support 78 - 0 20 40 60 80 100 ~ Pqge ley.Co.rr~dor Pro~ect- -~1/18 ./.05 . , . - • - : . .~c.:-. : : . How supportive would you be of the couplet being extended east to Evergreen Road? This would result in Sprague changing to a one way east of University. Would you say you... 173 responses J Strongly oppose 40 Somewhat oppose 14 Neither support 19 nor oppose Somewhat support 36 580/o Agree Strongly support 64 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 . - . ; ;,Pqge 13 . Valley:Corridor P:roject:-_ = 1/18/05 ~ ~ . . . . . . . r. _ . ~ Y . . . : . . . : . - - . . . . . _ . - . . . ~ . . ' ' ~.....k.._. . . . . : Community Preference Survey: Level of Agreement that Sprague/Appleway Coupiet Had Been Useful Improvement to Overall Roadway System (Q090) : 100% ■ n=393 80% sa% 44% 40% 25% 20% 0 o 0 a°~o Strongly Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Strongly : disagree disagree agree agree . - . . . . . . , . . Corr~dor Proje~t 1%18%05* . : . ~ - - - - . • - - - . . ; . . . : . _ . . _ Community Preference~Survey: Return Sprague Avenue, from University Road to Interstate 90, to Two-Way Traffic (Q095) ■ No n=37s L~ Yes 69% 31% : . . . . . :Page 15 . ~ Valley Corrido:r Pro~ect:_ -1/18/05 ' 3. _ . $ . . ? . . . . . . . ~ . ' . . . . . _ . ; . . . . . Community Preference Survey: Support/Opposition to Appleway Section of Couplet Being Extended East (Q100) _ 100% ■ n=393 ~a~o nap so% 0 40% 21% 20% o 0 192-10/10 0% Strongly Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Strongly oppose oppase support support < Pa e 16 Valle Corridor Pro ect 1/18/05= .9.. Y, J , i ~ . ~ , . ~ . . . . . . ~ - - • . ' - . . . . . ~ . . , . , . . _ . . . , . . . . . . . . . , . . : . . . . . . . ~ . . . - . . : _ ' • . _ . . . _ _ _ Community Preference Survey: Suppor°t/Opposition to Couplet Being Extended East to Evergreen Road (Q101) 100% $a% ■ n=393 so% 40% 34% 21 % 14% 22% 20% - 101:i o ~ a% Strongly Somewhat Neutral Somewhat Strongly oppose oppose suppart support Pa e 17 ~ : Val) r .e Corrtdo Pro ect 1%18/05 9 - . . . . . Y .J. _ : . . , -r i~--~..r... . . . . ~ ■ ~ Accomplishments... • SRTC approved $for completion of the EA i 2004, ~ • The County gave the City a Quit Claim Deed [ for the Railroad ROW in October, 2004. • Community Development completed the . econom ic analysis of : the Corridor in October, 20048 • SRTC approved $455,300 for preliminary en9ineerin9 in December, 2004. - : Page 18 ' ~ : ~ Val1e Corridor Pr.o ect . : . : . . Y. . . . . _ .:..1: . . ~ . . ~..1 - : ' . . . • . _ . . ~ . Outstandaing Issues,,.. • SRTC has not completed the traffic model i n9 for the project, ~ • Traffic model i n9 m ust be resolved to : a I low completion of the EA. : • SRTC issued a letter on December 21, 2004 statin9 there is a lack of growth in ~ traffic to wa rra nt add itiona I lanes, . . ~;:Pnge 19 ' ~ VaIIeY.Corridor Projecfi.. ;1/18/05. Iss-ues... co n. Outstanding' • SRTC has statedthat Sprague has a capacitY : of 5,000 vph (vehicles per hour), • The City's. a c ti ng Traffic Engi neer a nd the Assistant C have esti mated Sprague"s capacitY at 2,100-2,600 vph. • A recent developer"s traffic studY estimates the intersection of Pines a nd Sprague wi I I be -at LOS (level of service "F" in five yea rs. , . . Poge 20 ..~:=Valley :Corrdor Pro~ect 1/18/05 ~ , ; , Ail~ , Traffic Modeling SRTC Base Year Sprague EB West of P i nes - . A 1800-. , ; 1400 - 1200 ~ - - 1000 800 - r ~ - 600. 400. 200 - W 2004 Existing EMME2-2003 Tmodel 2- VISUM-2005 Counts 2003 ~ . : - . Ualley.Co.rr~dor.Project~ : . . ~ ~ ` ~ . . C~:h:crY_,...... c . . 1 , . . . , SRTC Traffic M . . 2025 Sprague EB , West of Pines c . . . _ .i , ~ ' . 1800 1600 - ~ . _ . . 1400 - ~ - - . x 1200 1000 / . , , 800-'~ . .~i 600 - . _ - 200 p. 2004 Existing EMME2-2025 Tmodel 2-2025 VISUM-2025 Counts . : _ . : Page /05 22 " Va11ey.Corridor Pro~.ect 1/~18 . . . . . . . - . . . . . . : . -r.-°'-,. " ~ \ l , ; . . ~ , . - - . . _ . . . _ How to Proceed.... . Continue to work with SRTC to resolve • . ~ the traffic model a nd comp~ letion the- Valley Corridor Environmen'tal Assessment. , ~ . . . . . ° Pn e 23 ' Valle Corridor Pro ect ~ 1/1$ _ .9 . . . . . . .-----y.......~. . :...t. 3 . Fir Spokane Regiimal Transportation Council sSR-1 C 221 W. First Avenue, Suite 310 • Spokane, WA 99201-3613 509/343-6370 FAX: 509/343-6400 December 21, 2004 Mr. Neii Kersten Public 1Norks Director City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: South Valley CorridorlAppleway Blvd Extension Dear Mr. Kersten: The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) has been working with the City of Spokane Valley over the past year to develop both short and long- range traffic volume projection for the Sprague Avenue Corridor from the Sprague Avenue Interchange to Tschirley Road. During this time we have modeled the corridor using Tmode12, Emme/2, and our most recent implementation of VISUM, which is one of the more advanced travel demand models available today on the market. Wth the assistance of you, Steve Worley, Bob Bruggemen, Ross Kelley, Marina Sukup, Jessica Hill, Ed Hayes, and a whole host of other people involved in travel demand modeling analysis, we have made some substantial improvements to the model network in the Spokane Valley. This has provided an opportunity for better analysis of the region's transportation system. We appreciate the time and effort the City of Spokane Valley staff has put into reviewing the networks. While there will continue to be improvements to the model incorporating new growth patterns east of Sullivan and more refinements in and around the Valley Mall area, there are certain findings that con#inue to remain the same regardless of the model improvements. The analysis continues to indicate there is a lack of sufficient growth in traffic volumes in the South Valley Corridor that would warrant additional capacity beyond the seven (7) lanes that currently exist on Sprague Avenue. Forec,asts indicate the traffic volume would be approximately 1,500 to 1,600 vehicles per hour in 2025 compared to the 5,000 vehicles per hour capacity. This is based on the current land use plans in effect as part of the Interim Comprehensive Plan for #he City, completed transportation improvements in the area, as well as those that are currently underway or programmed for completion during the horizon year. As we have discussed previously, alternative land use plans being considered by the City indicate the potential for downsizing of some commercial and retail areas in the Sprague Avenue Corridor. This seems to be consistent with the findings of the economic analysis conducted earlier this year. This potential change would continue to reinforce that existing capacity is sufficient to address potential growth and development in the corridor. There are still significant improvement opportunities worth considering along Sprague Avenue that could improve the arterial's efficiency. Construction of a crossover from Appleway to Sprague, east of University Road, much like Division-Ruby, in order to maintain a more even flow of traffic through the transition area. Similarly, improvements at the Pines Road and Sprague Avenue intersection to accommodate turning movements could improve its existing level of service. Development of a traffic signal interconnect system could also provide opportunities for improved signal timing and better progression of traffic. Unless we hear otherwise from the City of Spokane Valley, the SRTC will no longer continue the evaluation of additional roadway capacity in the Sprague Avenue Corridor. The SRTC continues to be available to assist the City of Spokane Valley by providing the information necessary to support transportation system efficiencies in the corridor, which might be forwarded to the Transportation Improvement Board as part of a re-scoping effort. Should you have questions, please contact me at 343-6370. Sincerely, Glenn F. Miles Transportation Manager cc: Gary Schimmels, SRTC Vice Chair 1= Q ~a DA.V ! fD -'v`.y N S :,r,DL1S5UCIRT~~.' January 7, 2005 N[r. Neil Kerste.n City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Avenue, Suiie 106 Spokane Vallcy, WA 99206 SUBJECT: SOUTA VALLRI' C4RR,1.UGR ' FORECAST A'IODLL An`ALl'S1S DF.aT NE:ll: Jn response to vour request, David Evans and Associates, lnc. (DE.A) has eeviewed the modeling forecasts ancl background informacion pertaining to the South Valley Corridor. The letter from SRTC stated that `The analusis continues to indiccrte thal tlrere is u lack of sufficierzt gr•rnvth zn traffic volumes in the South Ualley Coiridor that -would wQrrant additionul cUpaciry beyond the sevei? (7) lanss that cwrently exist on Sprague AveMUe. Forecasts irrdicate tlrz n•affic volume wauld be upPrnximarely 1,500 io 1,600 vehicles per hour in 2025 compared to the 5,000 velricles per hour caprrcity"....... °Unless we hear other frar, rhe Ciry SkTC will no langer continue the e»aluatian of additional roatl►vav capacin) in rhe Sprugue Averaue Cor-ridor'. Since the VISUM model is currently being updated, and appears Eo have numerous calibration problems witliin the Spokane Va11ey City LimiLs, it is our contention that at this time the model resulis should not be used for long- term plaruiing decisions. Areas of concern regarding the mode] and us,e of its forecas~5 are outlined below. l.. Luek Glpacity - The capacity cited in the letter (5;000 ve.hlhrJ3 lanes) is uscd only t:o simulate mid-block Operatin¢ conditions excluding the effects of intersections and intersection delays are separately added within the model. Capacity of an anerial carridor is strongly influeneed by the number of signal; per mile and the green time/cycle allocation to the arterial through movement. Were the signal delay to be iocorporated into the links (as same models clo), a better esiimate of true roadway capacity would be on the order of 2,100- 2,600 veh/hr/3 lanes. For the planning purpose of describing an arierial corridor's overall ability to cany traffic volumes, the loWer capacity accounting for intersection impacts should be used. 2. Problenu with ZOO.i V]SUM Base Mode! - The 2005 Base Moclel docs not accurately represent eaistino, ctinditions in the Spokane Va11ey City Limits, and the 2023 forecasts should no[ be used tivithout adjustment. This section roakes reference to two commonly used FI-fWA docurnenu for mociel calibration purposes: the 1990 Calibrating and Adjustment of System Planning Models (CASI'IA) and the 1997 A9ode] Validation and Reasonableness Checking, Manual (V1VR.CA). Specific concerns include: ■ The inaccurate rcpresentation of ihe Spokane Valley A1all, resulting in differenc.es be.iwee❑ existing e.ounts nnd Base A1ode1 volumes of-85% on Indiana Avenue at Evergree.n. West 110 Cataldo Spokane, XX%ashingroy 99201 Tclephont: 509-327-8697 Facsirnile: 509-327-7345 CCOD a ~ DaVE D E r.f ANJs aNIRA'SiSOCIF:TES INC. • 7he cqmpariso» between existing traffic counts and the Base Model clo not meei established guidclines for Coefficient of Determination (R2). According io the AqVRCM the R2 value should be greater thai 0.88. A reQressiori analysis of traffiic counts and Base Madel volumes alon~ the Sprague-Appleway corridor yields an Rgvalue. of only 0.62. ~1 rearession anal}~sis of the model's screenline counts yields aii R' value af 0.83. ■ The MVFZCM provides guidelines on allowable deviation from ADT voiumes on individuaE 1in}:s. Of the 141 lin}: volumes provided in the screenline analysis, only 51 % of those are within the allowablc deviation from their A_DT count ■ The CASPNI suogests limits for perrxnt error by funcUonal classifcation. The target value is +/-10% for A9ajor Arierials. Using the available counts and model results for the Spof:ane Vailey, the ovcrall error for this functional classification was c:alculated at -.i 1%. • The table below shows a comparison betvveen counts and Base Model volumes along the Sprague-Appleway Corridor. Althau;h some of the low volurnes on Sprague may be explained by the rnodeling of I-90 as a three-]ane facility in VISUNT, the difference should noi be as great as shown in the table. Congeb-tion on the north-south corridors betivee.n Sprague anc! I-90 would offset any travel time gains for commuttirs switching their trave] paih t.o the int--rstate. Furthermorc, such shifts in travel pattems would likely not wnount to more than S- ] 0% of traffic vrolumes west of University SLreeL rather than the 40% shqwn. Count Counted P,19 2005 ARodel Loca[ion Direction 1'e9r PeakVolume Volume %Difference Spraguc - .4ppleway WB 2003 1,771 874 -SI % west of Argonnc EB 2003 2,086 1,912 -8% Spragtie - .Appleway \4FB 2003 950 821 -14"/0 west of University EB 2003 2,141 867 -60% Sprague west of Pin=s WB 2004 1,226 874 -28ib EB 2004 1,447 997 -31 / Sprague west of WB 2004 1,228 886 -37% Evergreen EB 2004 1,324 763 -37% Sprague west Af Sullivan NVB 2004 1,074 426 -60% EB 2004 1,298 543 -58% Targef +/-10°/u 3. Lack of Post Prucex.sing - The use of model forecast volumes without any post-processino goes against the general practice for volume forecasting. Ti is common to utilize existing irafi~c counts as a base, then apply ihe difference (in percant or absolute numbers) betwsen the bhse and future year model to generate afuture year volume. This technique is especially appropriate when the base model is not well calibraced with eaisting corridor counts. West 9 10 Cataldo SpoE:anc, Washtngton 99201 Tclcphone: 509-327-8697 Hacsuiule: 509-327-7345 owo V(D EVAh15 DA Arl~A SSOClF1TcS tt.e. VVe believe there is sufficient reuon to request the V1SlJM moclel be better calibrated to the existing Spokane Valley counts to produce convincing forec:ast volumcs. 1Ue suagcst rezalibration after a thorough review of rhe problems with the exisLing land uses and TA? structure. .4t that tiene it would be more appropriate to mal:e predictions of future volumes for the South Val ley Corridor. Sincerely; UAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, I.NC. _ lnga Note; PE; FTOE Transportation Enbine€;r 11SFT:1 \VOL 11PROJEC7LS1SFICV 00W300110500D.`FOITT1Cauplet A nzJys isU..-}:erst-_rs-OI0705.doc Wcst 110 Gataldo Spokane, Vlashington 99201 Teleplioiie: 509-327-8697 Facsinile: 309-327-7345 Memorandm-i To: Nei] Kersten From: gob Bruegeeman Date: December 17, 2004 Re: Arieria! Capaary Attached is an excerpt from the Highway Gapacity Manual and some recent vehiGe volume reports for Sprague Avenue. SRTCs suggesfion tfiaf Sprague Avenue can aocommodate 4,500 to 5,000 vehides per direction is off by a fadDr of at least iwo trorn tivhat wduld be expected on such a facility. ~ ' t~t. . : ' r • ~ 'a. •_i~f ••n. l ~ i~ ~4-a.. L j. ~ i ..iT . ~ •~i - - . - . . . . . __'.~'•'tl. :w• L~. rtZ~ tY- 'V~~ i' . maxunum volumes and/or max.imum speeds (rather than xs minimurn speeds). The signalized and unsignalized intersection rocedures for e;stimating ciela_y can be used ~ zo P ~ a aip,wo wichout adspca[ion for collcctor and ]ocal stmets. e s d t5 -E I T_16_sig Im ie Signalized Intersections ~ ~ t+L~-': The an;ilysis of capacity and I OS 1t sienalized uitersecaovs g 5 must consider a wicle variety of prevsil.ing condit.ions, including the amount and distribulion of traffic movements, m .e0 m so ,m traffic composition, geometric characteriscics, and che PeakDiretUonVaEurnelCapaeltyRetia +y~'~:? details of intcrseciion signalization. A traffic signa] Figur2 7-3 Speed-Flow Curves for essentially allocates time among conflicting craffic movements that seek to use the same physical spscc. 7'he Class IV Urban Streets way in which time is allvcated has a significant effect on Noae; Assumpdons: 401cmfle mid-black EreGfluw speed, to km'lcngtn, the operation and lhe capacity• of the intersectaon and its 120 second c5'cie, 0.45 s/C.pre-tinaed signdC• arrival type 4,0.925 PHF, approaches. CaFacity is evaluated in terms of the ratio of tesi-auv pocbeas.l2% cuuns. ~-~demand flow ra[e (vohune) co ca aci 'T7us ratio (clc•sczribed p Souree: "1'roductian of the Yesr 240f► HC'A9," Stati.s Report, Catalina •'~;s.as a v/c ratio) is one oonsideration in determuvng LOS. The Engincering, Inc., T`CHR}' 3-55 (d), May 30, 1998, ExUibit 15-12_ measure of effectiveness for LOS is average control delay UnPeeblished Incctim'CRB Coitunitt9e on Hig6way Capacity and Qua1;ry nlcc rosteriel. pcr vehicle (in seconds per vebicle), of Sc Study of ao intelsection is doue by designating °lane groups," which become the unit of analysis. A lane goup consiscs a. . of one or more tru!'fic lanes on an intersecdan approach, or the approach as a wliole. Each !ane group is anxl}-zed separately. For a givefi lane group at a signslixect inLersection, three signal indications aree seen: green, yellow, xnd red. "fhc red indic.ation usually includes a short pcriod during which all indications are red, referred to as an "all-red" interval, which, with the yellow indication, forrns the change and clearance interval between two green pliases. Defuuti on of the variables and basic terms for descriUing traffic ilow at sio alir.ed intersections are provided in Table 7-7. z},~ Table 7-6 Service Volumes by Arterial Class , Oiie Dire~cliou'ltvnugh Service Volumc (vehRi) T umber of Clsss Lsnes LO5 A IAS B LOS C LOS D [AS E br: Classi t NIA 660 810 980 900 2 N/A 1,470 1,760 1,S90 11890 3 N/A 2,280 2.660 2,940 2.840 4 NIA 2,940 3.260 3,490 3,480 ; ; • Ua.. ciass v 1 nrA NIA 4460 ibo 840 2 ?.yA h`/A 1,020 1,644 1,800 3 T'lA NIA 1,550 2,510 2.710 4 T'!A N/A 1,89U 3,060 3,320 ; .~lF . . ' :,;•,L,:. CEass lII 1 Y!A N/A ?~?/A 670 SOU 2 N!A NIA 'JA 1,390 1,744 v/A N/A NIA 2,130 2,640 .4 N/A ?~I/A NIA Z,Tr00- 3.230 Class IV 1 NIA NIA NIA 690 780 2 N!A yJA NIA 1,540 1,700 . . ~ 3 N/A iVA N/A 2.340 2,510 40 4 . NIA NI!A N/A 2,660 3140 .;~"~K: • ' pi4 ' No[cs: pass I assLImes: S intccuoctions at 1.08 krn spar.ing, cycle. leOgth = 120 s, fiec-flow speed = 75 3:nVh. g/C = 0.45. r,nd atsival typc of~ Qass Illssqenes: S mterxeaions ac OSS L-m sja9cimg, cyclc lcngch =120 s, free- t~~ Dow spaed:=.65 kin/h, g!C t 0 4~ and,amZ~ t} pe 4 Ctass"III ass:m-m S inmrsccdons ac 0.32 )an spacing. cycle • 6^pRah . l20 s free-flov. -~SS)rliiefh, p~C = 0 4~ aad tiiva! [ype 4. Class i V as;umes: 5 inte~cti9ns at 4.23-~' S'RaCtt9gs cycl ~lengtt~ ~I~IJ F,~,C~ia'`~ ;SO km/h: t,;FC ~ 0.45, $nd arrival ryp_ 4. LOS esrmor be'achie'veb ~...r~_ ^^e'~'~}, , , - NIA f _ - ' . 1 y.. r r - . . . . • . . s . %c ~ ~r . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . , : ; . . - . . . . . Spokane-Count.y Public: Worizs . . . . _ . . Division of Enguieering, . . . . . . . _ ; , . . ' ~ - . Traff c Seccion , . . . . , . Road NIame : SPrague Ave Site: 4739-2-5012 Iaocation : Easf vf University Rd E113 Date: 07l0 Operator : RC Directior. Inten,al Nfon Tiie Wed Thu Tri Sat Sun IVeekday Week- Be•gin 7/5 7/6 7/7 7/8 7/9 7/10 7/11 Avg Avg 12:AM s " 38 45 • * " 41 41 1:00 * 36 39 37 37 2:00 23 34 * * * 28 29 3:00 26 30 * * 28 28 4:00 40 40 " s * 40 40 5:00 65 87 * ` * 76 76 6:00 * ] 5S 156 157 157 7:00 290 298 294 244 8:00 s 519 450 484 484 9:00 * 614 622 618 618 10:00 * 829 750 rt ~ * * 799 789 11:00 * 934 858 * * * * 896 896 12:PM * 1,034 970 " * * * 1,002 1,002 1:00 * 1,102 970 * * * 1,036 1,036 2:00 * 994 978 * * * 986 986 3:00 1,014 987 * * ° * 1,000 1,000 4:00 * 1,196 1,058 * ~ t f 1,127 1,127 . s:oo * 1,097 1,126 f • _ • 1,111 1,111 6:00 ; 622 689 655 655 7:00 * 420 464 • ' * 442 - 8:00 * 365 408 * * * 386 3 9:00 222 293 * * " * 257 2> 10:00 136 122 * ' ` * 129 129 11:00 " 88 105 96 96 Totals A 11,634 11,532 275 0 0 U 11,715 11,715 AM Pea}; " 11:00 11:00 5:00 l 1:00 11:00 Volume * 934 858 87 * * * 896 896 PM Peak * 4:00 5:00 4:00 4:00 Vqlume s 1,196 I,126 1,127 1,127 . DataFile: . 4739-2-5012El3 I'nnled: 1211512004 P3Ee: I . . . , . . , . • Snokane Cc►untN, Public N-Vorks - . • ' - . . . ` . , . . , , Division of Enp-uneei•ing ' . . • ' " Traf6c Set.tion d Name : Sprazue Ave Sice: 4739-2-5012 tion :East of iJniversity Rd W113 lla[a 07/05/04 atar : RG Directior lnterval sVlon Tue Wed Thu Pri Sat Sun Weekday wee1; scoin 7/5 7r6 7n 7i8 7i9 7/10 7111 .avg nvg 12:AM 75 91 * : } 83 83 1:00 * s 33 49 k ` 41 41 2:00 33 44 x * * 38 38 3:00 * * 38 30 * " * 34 34 4:00 * * 66 68 67 67 5:00 181 181 * * " 181 181 6:00 ~ 338 398 424 385 386 7:00 ` 789 7$3 * * » : 786 786 8:00 * 721 721 * ' e * 721 721 9:00 * 826 808 * g " * 817 817 10:00 * 971 916 943 943 11:00 1,148 1,064 * " * * 1,106 1,106 12:FM « 1.255 1,215 r " w * 1,235 1,235 1:00 ' 1,228 1,186 1,207 1,207 2:00 * 1,184 1,122 * * * s 1,153 1.,153 3:00 s 1,164 1,122 * * # • 1,143 1,143 4:00 1,142 1,112 1,127 1,127 5:00 " 1,010 1,006 * ~ ' * 1,008 1,005 6:00 745 791 * " ° t 768 768 7:00 * 580 576 * * ` * 578 578 9:00 * 431 522 * * ` * 476 476 9:00 * 365 426 395 395 IO:OU * 206 242 224 224 11:00 * 126 140 133 133 Totals 0 14,229 14,576 887 0 0 0 14,650 14,650 AM Pea}: * l I:00 11:00 6:00 11:00 11:00 Volume * 1,148 1,064 424 1,106 1,106 PM Pea}; * 12:00 12:00 ; * * • 12:00 12:00 Voltune 1,255 1,215 1,235 1,235 ' : Data filc": • .4739-2-5012•tVB • • - : - . ' . . Prinsed : . 1271572004:7 Yakt ; I y Public Wc►rl:s ~ . . . . . - . . _ . • . . . , . . Svokane Count- , . • . . . Division of Engineering • • ' • Traffic Szction ' Road Narne : SDrague Ave Site: 4739-4-SR27 Location : West oC SR-27 (Pines Rd) Date: 07/ 01}era;or : RC lnterval Mon 5 Tue 6 Vded 7 Thu 8 Fri 9 Sat 10 Sun 1 1 Weckday AVg. I3ekin NNB E K NVB E13 N1`B F K WB LB M'B LB N1'B Eti V1'R EB 11'B fB 12:A2'A • ` • • 81 60 69 56 ` • • • ` • 85 SR 01 _(MO • s ` • 40 48 58 35 ' • • • ` • 49 41 02:00 ' ' • ` 30 32 39 39 34 35 03:00 4 f • ` 36 32 36 24 ' ' • • ` ' 36 28 04:00 a ♦ • s 68 54 65 47 s . ~ r t • 66 50 05:06 " • • • 164 98 166 112 s . • + k • 165 105 06:00 ' 4 224 142 363 218 356 209 • ` • ' ' ' 314 189 07'00 ' t 714 3E4 730 386 ' • ` s • • ' • 722 375 08:00 ` ' 740 568 687 521 0 • ' ' • • ~ • 713 544 09;00 ` ' 864 76•8 812 741 ' 4 • ' ` • 838 754 ' 10:00 • ' 1.046 954 945 482 a • 4 ` • • • • 995 968 II:00 • s 1.147 1.106 1,130 1.066 ' ' ' ` ' ' • ` 1,138 1,086 12:PM ` • 1.250 1.201 1.256 1,161 • • s • • • • ` 1,253 1,181 OI:QO ' ' 1.324 1.303 1.140 1.162 « . • . . « s • • 1.232 1.232 62:00 • ' 1.258 1.179 1.175 1:132 ' ~ • ~ s s • s 1.218 1.205 03:00 • ' 1.254 1.244 l.l72 1.200 s • . . • • • = 1.213 1.222 • 04:00 • ' 1126 1.447 1.140 1:234 ' • . s . • • < 1.183 1.340 05:00 ' • 1.068 1.304 1.066 1.376 ' • ' • • • ° ' 1.067 1.340 06:00 • ' 835 790 852 864 ` ~ • • ` ' ' 0 943 922 07:00 639 530 644 630 ` • ' ' ~ • ' 4 641 580 08:00 • R 476 478 558 484 ~ • s . . • s s 517 481 09:00 ` • 342 283 477 371 • • • • • • ` • 409 327 10:00 195 155 216 194 ` • • ` < • • • 205 174 11:00 • • 126 IUL 136 130 • • ` : • • • ` 131 116 'Potuls 0 0 14.728 13.912 14_921 14.276 809 522 U 0 0 U U 0 15.067 14255 Combine:d 0 28,640 29.197 1,331 0 0 0 29.3 Split % 0_0 .0 51.4 48.6 51.1 48.9 60.9 39.2 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 51.4 .6 AM Peak Hr t ' 1 I:00 I1:00 1 I:QO I L-00 06:00 06:00 • ' ' ' ' • I t:00 I 1:00 Volume s • 1.147 1.106 1.130 1,066 356 209 ' ' ' ' • " 1.138 LO$G PM Penl;Hr ~ ' 01:00 04:00 12:00 05,00 12:00 04:00 \10111mc ' ' 1.324 1.447 1.256 1.376 • • • • • ' • • 1.253 1.340 Datn Filr_• Printod . . 12/i-5I2004"- = YaQe : . I . . . . . . . . _ - Spokane Count>' Public IN'orks . . . . . . . , . . . ' . • • . , llivision of EngineerinQ • • . Ti-affc Section ' • td,jNanne Spra.~ue Ave Site: 4739-2-Sft27 an East of SR-27 (Pines Rd) Date: 07/05/04 tor : RC [nterval Mon 5 Tue 6 Wed 7 Thu fi Fri 9 Sat 10 Sun 1 I W eal;day Avg. Begin NVR LB WB Gt3 NYR I.ti WK F;R WB Fst; WB CB NYB EB WB EI3 12:AM • • • • 86 69 90 52 • • • • • • 88 60 Ql:PO • • • • 47 38 60 44 • • • • • • 53 34 02:00 4 • ' 4 41 10 38 34 • • ` ' • • 39 37 03:00 • • ' 4 40 32 35 30 ~ c c • s s 37 31 04:00 s • s 4 50 56 40 47 • s s . a c 45 51 OS:OQ s s s • 122 112 131 I04 • • ~ c ` ' 126 !OR 06:00 I26 94 276 214 271 192 • • • • ` 0 225 166 07:00 552 390 574 409 ' ' • ' ' ' ' • 563 399 08:40 ' R 606 628 588 597 • • • • • , • 0 597 612 09:00 840 830 746 8f►4 ' 793 917 lo:oo • • 994 1.022 452 1,066 R ` ` ' ` • ` ` 973 1,044 11:00 ' ' 1.136 E.I82 1,031 1.136 r • • • + < r • 1.083 1.159 ' 12;pm • ' 1.204 E.307 1.172 1.262 • • • • • • ' ' 1.188 1.284 01:00 s • 1.180 1.322 1.159 1.242 ' " • • • • • • 1.169 1.282 02:00 ' • 1106 I301 1.154 1138 ' s . s s • s s 1.180 1,269 03:00 ' • 1.211 1.255 l.174 1.274 • • • • • • • • 1.192 1.250 • . . ~ • • • • 1.170 1.315 04:00 ' • 1,192 1.404 1,148 1,227 s s c s s s • s I.082 1.316 05:00 t ' 1.096 1314 1,069 1.30 9 06:00 856 816 $46 914 ' ' ~ ' ` ` • ' 851 865 07:00 ' • 631 592 659 621 645 606 08:00 • • SQS 494 522 524 ~ c • s ~ • • a 513 509 09:00 s * 364 302 456 358 • ` ` ' • ` ~ ` 410 330 10:00 ' • 220 170 228 200 ' 224 185 11:00 k!S 92 142 122 • . • • • • ~ s 130 107 1i 0 0 14,039 14.546 14.282 14,574 665 499 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,376 14.871 nccl 0 25.585 29.156 1.164 Q 0 0 29.247 Snlit% 0,0 ,0 49,1 50.9 49.0 51.0 57.1 415 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 451 50.8 ans Feak Ar • • t 1:00 1 I:00 11.00 I 1:00 06:00 06:00 l 1:00 1 l:00 Voli,ime • ' 1.136 1.182 1.031 1.136 271 192 • ~ ` ' ' • 1.083 - 1.159 NM PeakHr ' ` 03:00 04:00 03,00 05:00 03:00 05:00 Volume • t 1.211 1.404 1.174 1.319 s s s s s a s s 1.192 1316 . , :Data-File;-,.. 9,739.2•SR=27: . _ _ - . . . , . _ , . . , • Pdnied 1V1'j/29(W` Taee : 1 - , . . . . -•anoKane uuuncl' runtic NroorKS . , . : . , . . ' . . . . . • Division of EngineerinQ . . : • • . Traffic Section • ' Road 'Nlame : Spra,ue Avc Site: 4739-4-1170 Location : Wr.st of EverE;reen Rd Datc; 07/ Operatur : kC lnterval Man 5 Tue 6 Wed 7 Thu 8 1=ri 9 Sat 10 Sun 1 l «'eekciav AMLF 13e~;in Ws Es NNfB Cs Nve cs wB ce ~AT H H kvi; rii Nvr; rn W8 EB 12AA9 R • • 4 65 52 79 60 ' ' • • ~ * 72 56 01:00 ~ ' • ' 38 32 48 32 ' ` • ~ ~ ~ 43 32 02:00 ' • • 4 34 39 35 28 • • • • • ; 34 33 03:00 « * • 4 28 38 24 30 • • • • • ~ 20 34 09-00 ~ ~ • 4 42 46 26 47 • • ' • r ~ 34 46 05:00 • • 4 4 lOS 134 114 114 ' : a • ~ • lli 124 06:00 s • 32 30 252 253 254 212 • • • • • • 179 165 07:00 " • 532 434 566 444 • • • ` • • ' ` 549 439 08:00 • ' 687 534 582 533 ' • ' s ~ • t ~ 634 533 09:00 ` • 848 749 794 761 ► t s s• ♦ s s • 821 755 10:00 • r 1.000 906 983 198 ' • • • • * ~ • 991 952 11,00 1.128 1.143 1,118 1.112 • • • • • • • • 1,123 1.127 12:PM ' • 1.265 1?49 1.222 ].2[7 r « s = s s • R 1.243 1.233 01:00 = « 1.237 1.306 1,224 1.239 ' • • • • • • 0 1.230 1.272 02:00 ` t 1.256 1.235 1.235 1.240 ' • • " • • • , 6 1.247 1.237 03:00 ' • 1.188 1.296 1.176 1.257 • . • . • • • + 1.182 1.276 04:00 • R 1.228 1.324 1.190 1.246 * • • • • • • 6 1.209 1.285 05:90 • 1.093 1.342 1.102 1.346 • ~ ► • s r • s 1.097 1344 06:00 814 974 844 1,029 829 ].OOI . 07:00 630 634 636 672 ' • • • • • • ` 633 653 08:06 • • 505 480 545 502 • ' • s ~ ~ • s 525 491 09:00 ` • 369 333 414 376 ' R • • • * • • 391 354 10:90 212 178 204 168 • • • • • • • s 208 173 I1:00 • • 114 SS 116 90 • ' ~ s ~ f + ' 115 87 Totnls 0 0 14,138 14.232 14,521 14,824 586 523 0 0 0 0 0 0 14,526 14.702 Comhincd 0 28.370 29,345 1.103 0 4 0 29._ Snlit % 0.0 .0 49_8 502 49.5 50.5 52_6 47.4 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 49.7 .3 A A9 Peak Hr • ' 11.00 11:00 11:00 11:00 06;00 06;00 ` • • • • • I 1:00 11100 Volumc ' • 1.128 1,143 1,118 1,112 254 212 ' ' ` • ~ ~ 1,123 1,127 P19 PeakHr • ' 12'00 05;00 02:09 05:00 • • • • • • • • 02:00 05:00 Vohirne • • 1.265 1,342 1.239 1.346 • ' ' ~ ~ • • ' 1247 1.344 ' , ::I?ataFilE.:.;-.,47~4-4-1i70.., . • ; . : . . , :;.n. . , Printed:12/!5/2QD4:.;, Pags: I , r.:;... . , . . . . . _ JllUhtilll: I..UULI,V I'.UUlll' 1'V W'KJ . . • . . _ ' ' • ' ' , . • . , Division of Enrinee.ring • • _ . , . 'rrafiic section Road ddame : SpraRue Ave Site: 4739-4-0004 ta on l~ Vesi of.Aciams Rd llal e: 07/A5/04 tor RC l Mon 5 Tue 6 Wed 7 Thu 8 Nri 9 Sat I0 Sun 1 1 We&-day Avg. I3E-oin 1`'Q CI3 11'13 LEi WB E il 11`B EB \N'B EK N't3 GB W'B E 6 11'R EB 12:Aiti1 r ° • • 55 64 70 63 ~ s • ~ r s 62 bl 01:00 30 42 37 47 33 44 02:00 ' ' • ' 26 36 29 36 ~ s • • ` ` 27 36 03:00 s ' • • 34 48 25 30 w ' 29 39 04:00 ` s ' ' 47 47 30 Aq ' 38 AS US:QO ` 12$ 148 134 126 ` • • ' ' ' 131 137 06:00 • e s s 318 217 332 191 s . s s • 4 325 204 07:00 ' • 592 380 648 410 • • « ' • _ ' ' 620 395 08:00 ' • 723 508 668 513 r • • 695 SIO 09:00 ' ' 858 696 606 696 ' ' ' • • ' ' + 832 691 10:00 s ' 898 943 922 946 • r • • ' • • • 910 944 I ! :00 • ' 1,008 1.124 1,037 1,094 • • , ' ' • • ' : 1.022 1,109 12_F1v9 s ' 1.1$5 1.274 1.120 1.194 r s • ~ s ~ • • 1.152 1,234 01:04 R s 1.142 1.265 1.094 1.248 • s r • s s r • 1.118 1.256 02:00 1.111 1.252 l.]OU 1.277 • • t • • . s = I.108 I164 03:00 ' • 1.111 1.329 1,004 1.224 ' • • s ' • ' • 1.057 1?76 04:00 1.103 1.345 l.Oi$ 1.344 • • ' ' ' • ' ` 1,080 1346 05:00 1.020 1.398 452 1.348 • • : ` • • : ~ 986 1.373 06:00 ' • 752 1.067 768 1,023 ` ' ' " ` • ' ' 760 1,015 07:00 • • 562 683 558 718 ' • • ' • • • ' 560 700 08'00 ' s 431 512 440 550 • s s • • s e s 460 531 09:00 320 335 338 403 • ' ~ ' ' ' r ` 329 369 10:00 185 202 177 200 ~ + • s s • • • 181 201 t L•00 ' • 47 96 102 ] OS • • ' ' ' • * ` 99 101 Tutals 0 0 13.098 14,352 13.486 14.882 657 542 0 U 0 0 U 0 13,614 14.884 inrd 0 27A5fl 28368 1.199 0 0 0 25.498 Sa it I. 0.0 .0 47.7 52.3 47.5 52.5 54.8 45,2 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 47.8 52.2 ANf Peak Hr ] 1:0D ! t^DO 11.00 11:00 06:00 06:00 ' • ' ' R ' I 1:00 11:00 <<ulume t ` 1.008 1.124 1.037 1.044 332 191 ' ' • L022 1.109 rnI 1'eal:Hr 12:00 05:00 12:00 05:00 • ' ' ' s ' ' • 12:00 05:40 Volume 1,185 1,398 1,120 1.348 • • ` • • • _ ` 1.152 1.373 I7ataFitc:. •.473Q-S-OOOg' . • . . . • . . ,,`.y, .Piiitted':~~'=.fJ15/20(ki' . ~•Pnsc: I , h'. . .r _ i.•1..5: l '..a1.iv~~~~u~. ~.Va~.u~,~ ~ t V~.~ . , • . . . . . . . ' . . . • , . Division of Engineerinr , . . . . . _ . 1'rafTic Section . Itoad "Name : Snraguc Avc Site: 4739-4-4597 Lacation :West oCSullivan Rd pate: 07/ " Oneeator : RC II1lerval Mon 5 Tue 6 Wed 7 Thu S Pri 9 Sat 10 Sun 11 Wc:e}:day , Bekin 1Y13 GB NIIB GB WfS N F3 1V$ EB 11II3 G[i EB N1'fi LQ N1'13 LQ 12:AP.9 a : ' • SG 50 69 EO • • • ♦ • • 52 55 O l :00 31 47 32 40 ' • ' ~ • • 31 43 01:00 ~ ` • • 24 34 23 33 • • • • • • 23 33 03:00 ~ • • • 28 44 25 28 ' • • • ' ~ 26 34 04'00 • ' ' s 3$ 53 26 SO • • ' ' • • 32 Sl 05:00 • • ' = 112 140 118 116 • • • • • • 115 128 06:00 ' ~ • • 237 230 232 212 ~ • ~ • • ~ 234 221 07:00 • • 404 294 538 406 • ~ • • • ~ • • 411 351 OR;Ap 611 534 55fl 507 • s ~ a ~ ~ • ► 580 520 09:00 ' • 748 668 663 644 s ~ • • « • < < 705 656 10:00 • • 812 924 830 942 - • • • • • • • • 821 933 11:00 • • 971 1.104 966 1.066 • • 4 • • • • • 968 1.086 12:PM 1.090 1159 1.062 l. i 9b t • « a ~ s 1.076 1.227 01:00 • ' 1.078 1.240 992 1.145 ' • • • • • • • 1.035 1,218 02:00 1,064 1220 1.024 1.186 ' • ' ` ' ' • ' 1.044 1.203 03:00 • _ 1.053 1192 976 1.178 • • • s s s s k 1,014 1,230 04:00 ' • 1.0 i4 I,298 I.000 1.283 ` s • • • ~ ~ " 1.037 1.290 05:00 958 1,368 924 1,317 ' ~ • • • • " ' 941 1,342 06:00 • • 710 950 693 976 • • ' • ' • • ' 701 963 07:00 • ' 560 692 522 674 ' ' < < t ' s • 541 693 08:00 • ` 40€ 510 464 580 ' • • • • • • • 434 545 09:00 280 319 319 379 • • r ' • • ` • 299 349 10:00 R R 188 218 149 201 ' : ~ • « s = = 168 209 I 1 AO ' • 88 93 104 110 ' ' • • • • • ' 96 101 Totnls 0 0 12,093 13,973 12302 14.439 525 539 0 0 0 0 0 U 12,454 14.471 Combineci 0 26.066 26.741 1.064 Q 0 0 26,9 Split % 0.0 .0 46.4 53.6 46.0 54.0 493 50.7 0,0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 46.3 , AA1 Feal: Hr ] 1:00 ] 1:00 1 I:00 ! 1:00 06:00 06:00 t ' ~ f = • 11:00 l I:00 Volumc • • 971 1,104 965 1.068 232 212 4 968 1.086 Po\i Pcml:l,lr 12:00 05:00 12:00 05=00 • • s s a s ~ t 12:00 05•00 Nlolumt ' F 1.090 1,365 1,062 1.317 ~ ~ • • • ~ • ' 1.075 1342 17dtaFite: ,_4-~39e4-~597 . , . - ' - : , , . 4. . . . . ' . . , _Yrinted'i`= .l?!I5/3UQ4-r°° E Psrze: 1 ~ WSDOT Access Revision Request at Riverside and Pines December 22, 2004 ~ Page 9 ~ 2005 /2015 AND 2025 LEVEL OF SERVICE AT RIVERS(DE AVENUE AND PINES ROAD Based upon the analysis presented with the additional movements as noted in ~ Table 4 and 5 above, the anticipated or resulfing level of service for the new intersection at Riverside Avenue is LOS B for the westbound right turn for all conditions for all evaluation years, see Table 6 below. Additionally, the ( southbound left tum will run at LOS A for the same time frame from 2005 through 2025. ( Table 6-PM Peak Hour Level of Service -'C. .~~(S)ignaliz d ,or ~ ~ ~Exisfin PM~Peak Hour.~.,.~ JNTERSECTION ~r~ ~c s~r~alized~ _ ~ -Dela-Y,~ sec/veh , ~,-~Z~~ LOS y= , ~y~ Pines and S ra ue S 40.6 D Pines and Main U 15.9 B ~ Pines and Riverside U(WB A proach) 10.0 B - : . _ ,•~~~."~~T~.':~~~~rr~ss . ! Pines and S ra ue S 94.8 F Pines and Main U EB A roach) 727.5 F ~ Pines and Riverside U B A proach _ 10.2 B w . . N~ '~2025WI ~A_Tccess a~ Pines and S ra ue S 126.7 F ~ Pines and Main U EB A roach 999+ F Pines and Riverside U B A roach 10.6 B I As shown in Table 6, for 2005 all intersections within this stretch of Pines Road ~ area are operating within acceptable levels of service. However, witfi growth on this leg as shown, both Pines and Main and Pines. and Sprague move to failure in I 2015 and continue to fail through 2025. The failure at Pines and Main is because of the through and left tums both from eastbound and westbound from Main to Pines. Therefore, by removing both of the westbound to northbound and the I eastbound to southbound lefts as well as through movements from the IUlain to Pines would improve this intersection. Therefore, in order to determine the impacts to this area, we evaluated a similar modification at Main which is similar I to what we are requesfing at Riverside; wherein the southbound to eastbound as well as the northbound to westbound left turns are maintained and the minor (Main Avenue) through and lefts are prohibited. Then the resulting LOS would I be very nearty the-same or better'than those shotivn in Table 6 for tfie Riverside and Pines proposed intersection. This result is shown in Table 7 below. 1 , ~ WSDOT Access Revision Request at Riverside and Pines i Decembe r 22, 2004 ~ Page 10 Table 7-PM Peak Hour Level of Service wtth Modifications on Pines .ti~ -+.::a•+a- c~'-, r w . ~ER~CTION~~'s G j gnalized ~4~lrh~~~. ~ yxistmgrPM~PeakiHou 'c. 2:0~1~~.~~►~l~c e~s~anel~Co plet~Mo~~f~~ati ns'~`~~~-~~~~ ~ Pines and S ra ue S 48.3 D Pines and Main U EB A roach 14.8 B ~ Pines and Riverside U(V1/6 A proach) 10.0 B - 025 wl~~i cc essV . an'`d~-Cou ~et 1Vlod~fica it o` s.,.;_ ~ Pines and S ra ue S 51.8 D i Pines and Main U EB A roach 16.2 B Pines and Riverside U B A roach 10.6 B ~ Also shown in Table 6 is that the Pines and Sprague intersection, with the addition of a consistent 1-percent growth rate is destined to fall to LOS F, i sometime in the next ten years. While we did not run a year by year analysis or ~ evaluation, we are assuming that this intersection will reach LOS E in two years and LOS F in five years. Although not included within this packet of information, ( we evaluated at least five different scenarios using the standard intersection configuration w'rth numerous timing pattems and with only a few exceptions in 2015 could we obtain an adequate LOS that would remain adequate unti! 2025. ` Primarily, using a standard intersection configuration, the only way to make this intersection continue to move anywhere near acceptable limits was to add dual left lanes both eastbound and westbound on Sprague which would increase I Sprague Avenue within this area to an 8-lane facility and even then the resulting LOS was still below an acceptable level of service with and LOS of E. ~ Based upon our understanding of the traffic issues in the Valley as well as the issues associated with the total volumes at the Pines and Sprague intersection it is apparent from our analysis that the only viable solution to the Pines and , Sprague intersection in the long term is the expansion, construction and irnplementation of the Sprague Avenue Couplet. The leve(s of service shown in Table 7 for Pines and Sprague intersection are with the couplet in place, so by default there would be no eastbound leg opposing the volumes on the other legs, thereby taking approximately 1400 vph out of the intersection during the PM ~ Peak hour. The only modification that would need to be made would be to accommodate a free northbound to eastbound right turn to accommodate the anticipated 900 to 1000 right turns during the PM Peak hour and throughout ~ much of the day. QUEUE ANALYSIS FOR SOUTHBOUND PINES ROAD I As this newly proposed intersection is 450' centerline to centerline from _ Sprague Avenue a queuing analysis for southbound vehicles was prepared to f determine if there was an opportunity for the queue to back into this proposed I I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ~ Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 18, 2005 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ cflnsent El old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing (A information [D admin. report pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report: Overview of the Introduction and five of the eight elements of the proposed Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.7013, WAC 365-195, Spokane Valley Ordinance 03- 52 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council was briefed on the progress of the Comprehensive Plan on September 28, 2004. BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Ordinance No. 03-52. During 2004, the City conducted a survey of community opinions, and held eight Community Workshops at various locations throughout the City. Many of the priarities (goals) are typically general in nature, while the implementation strategies (policies) are much more specific and are presently intended only to identify issues deserving public review and comment, many of which the Council has nof considered. This structure will enable the City Council to rank, schedule and evaluate the performance/success of the City implementation of the Plan. Both priorities and strategies may be replaced, modified or deleted as the citizen participation process progresses. ~ The Comprehensive Plan is intended to accomplish the following: • Meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act, the Countywide Planning Policies, state and federal mandates. Compliance with the law is not stated as a "priority" since it the most fundamental requirement for City operation and plan production. • Benchmark existing conditions. This will permif future updates to track progress over time. • Consolidate the requirements and standards included in other documents and the plans of other agencies, to provide a comprehensive compendium of factors affecting Spokane Valley's future. • Explain the interdependencies between Plan elements and provide a readable explanation of the elements of issues. As the process continues, it is anticipated that some "explanation" may no longer be required, if for example, a strategy were either eliminated or replaced. • Provide a roadmap for future policy consideration and action, including regulatory requirements, levels of service, capital improvements and financing. The City adopted a Citizen Participation Program on September 23, 2003, aligned with the recommendations enumerated in WAC 365-195-600(2) including visioning, the role of the Planning Commission, public meetings and hearings, notice, solicitation flf written comments and the means of communication to be utilized in soliciting citizen comment. The results of the Citizen Survey are incorporated in the Plan document itself. The Planning Commission has - been a vital resource in soliciting citizen input during the Community Workshops. Administrative Report Cornprehensive Plan Overview Page 2 of 2 ~ Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation Adoption Process I ma wa wa wa oice aaas 1D 7esk M1'sme Sfart Fiirish Durafiun rm ryo w. M wi .r.T - w- a- oa - tk wM rajl .w t Deta colbction 1 11 120o4 j 12292004 62w ! _ . . . : • : - - - _ . . , ; 2 Canminitylrput 1110004 6130ILiJ04 2B1 : 3 Disansion Onft lmrmh}i 7f12DD4 911I2004 ---9,- - ~ . 4 f„omminify FaaAhadc : 9120DD4 i 121S1I200-1. 17 4w - - - . . _ . 5 Irr,'ial Die 1f32D06 ~ 3J11200.5 8,ew ~ - . _ - - - 6 FL"ieHesrinps 3rZ2W6 ~ 412D,'2005 B.aN 7 Cnulc7 Apprrn•el M29Y1005 l Sft212f105 . 2w e D2!lapment Repuaiims ^--7JY712004 , G/.tt/zt105 I WlEf@ W@ 8f@ The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan contains an introduction, seven required elements, and a Natural Environment element required by the County-Wide Planning Policies. The following elements are included at this time: Natural Environment, Housing, Economic Development, Utilities, Parks & Recreation. Land Use and Transportation are tentatively scheduled for February 15, 2005 and the Capital Facilities element will be presented on March 1, 2005. The Natural Environment element requires approval from the Department of Ecology. The Parks & Recreation element will be supplemented by the 10-year Parks & Recreation Master Plan, with information concerning citizen preferences to be incorporated within the Comprehensive Plan following the consultant survey. The Housing element focuses on the provision of affordable housing, as prescribed by the Countywide Planning Policies, and has been reviewed by the agencies providing housing services. The Economic Development element draft has been reviewed by agencies with activities in Spokane Valley. It is anticipated that additional agencies will also submit comments as the process continues. Draft documents will be updated with 2004 year end data where appropriate. OPTIONS: Not applicable. RECOMMENDED ACTION: None required. BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, AICP, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Power Point Presentation ~1)epartment of Community De~~elopment , E:k e 9 . 1! ~`j Planning bivision S-pokane Valley 2025 Comprehensive Plan vervi 4 ew January 18, 2005 . : • qirrr~nuxFSra4r•fl`• ' tt~;~ ~ , - Department of Community-Dcvelopment ~ S 'IV .Planning Pivisio.r.i Plan Elements ❖ Required - ✓ Land Use ✓ Transportation ✓ Capital Facilities ✓ Housing ✓ Utilities ✓ Economic Development ✓ Parks & Recreation ❖ Optional - ✓ Natural Environment . C) - r,fT'.74+11O5r'JK:uE:, I r `?ei'. ' n.,~~ ~ Department of Commuuity Development 'Sporkane , . . Planning Division. iljirpo s e~--~s of P ❖ Benchmark existing conditions ❖ Consolidate requirements into single document ❖ Provide explanation of interdependencies between elements ❖ Provide policy roadmap for community over life of the plan ❖ Meet State and Federal planning requirements c rrryU so Knh=v. - ' . . Iaepartment of Commiinity Development . . '~alle: . Planning Division . S-~ E P R~, A e ientcs ❖ Plan must meet SEPA requirements ❖ City adopted County Final Supplemental EIS ❖ Comprehensive Plan being prepared as an "Integrated Document" ❖ Draft SEIS issued as part of the Draft Comprehensive Plan ~ , ; C7'fFfMlIR5PAK4NPV. ' - - - . . , - :nepartment of Community Development ' po at"e :Plaariing Division - , , Comprehens"ive Plan: Housing Elemen Overv'iew January 18, 2005 ; nai@srpKAivv. , - cm n,%~ . :l)epartment of Community Devela S pment ~o"kane.. . e: Planning Divis.ion Requirements GMA ❖ Inventory & analysis of existing & projected needs ❖ Policies, objectives for preservation, improvement & development ❖ Identifies land for housing ❖ Adequate provision for ALL economic segments of the community . Department of Communi 'Development y~ ~ S'polzane . ~ .00•'~'~alle. . Planning Division . Underlying Tenets ❖ Quality of housing inextricably linked to quality of the neighborhoods "Affordability" measured by diverse needs of different populations and services required ❖ Location a key to affordability ❖ Current inventory basic for assessment of future affordability Glr7 nltGse6~REv: u • , . ~~~1 - Department of' Community D,evelopment ~ ~_~e: . . Plannin g Division ~ - ` - . Priorities ❖ Preserve & protect existing residential neighborhoods & require new development to be of a scale and design compatible with existing neighborhood character ❖ Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of all residents of the community and region ❖ Support the affordable housing initiatives of the SHA, SNAP, etc., with proven record . ❖ Provide for housing needs of special populations i.e. the elderly, mentatly ill, victims of domestic abuse, persons with debilitative conditions or injuries, and the homeless ~ ci~rialpsPO~.vEv, Department of Community.:I~evelopment - S`°okane ' ~~a~.le: _ Planning Division - ; . Major Policy Issues ❖ Design guidelines with buffer zones and transition requirements. ❖ Support programs targeted at neighborhood preservation, including Weed and Seed, housing rehabilitation, etc. ❖ Encourage the development of neighborhood associations and work with these groups to refine neighborhood plans ❖ Reduce the adverse impacts of freight and air traffic movements through requirements for noise attenuation adjacent to residential land uses ~ crcY4iAu~nsrow;Nev. •nepartment of Coinmunity.:Development ~m . . , Planning Divisi.on Y Comprehens'ive Piano, Utilit'ies Element Overvoiew January 18, 2005 1 - CITYN~ItQgSPOK•+:~~.'. !~o . „ :Department of Community Development _ ~io ` . . e Planning .Divisian ' , GMA Requirements ❖ Required Element ❖ Consistent with CWPP's ❖ Includes: ✓ Electrical ✓ Natural Gas ✓ Telecommunications ❖ Water & Sewer in Capital Facilities Element ~t"tHriti!tiSfoK..! m , F Department of Cammu nity DeveYopment " WIz,_. ~ - . aiov. . ~-P annin -Di .vision~ . l~j . . n rc Major Poloicy Issues ❖ Coordination - joint use of trenches, conduits, and poles ❖ Undergrounding utilities - new development, major street projects ❖ Communication - street projects to minimize conflicts with pavement cutting policies . ; _ ; . ~ ~ ; : • crrttpsPOw,r.nc, „ Department of Community ~De~~elopmeiit S"~oVne Planning .l)iviSion d !i Comprehensive Plan: Economic Development Element Overview January 18, 2005 CtiYri tt's?aK.ret: - - - Department Qf Community.Development= ~pone . ~1'e Planning Division ~ - - i~ GMA .n - . e Requirements ❖ Summary of Local Economy • Population • Employment • Payroll • Businesses • Sales ❖ Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses ❖ Policies, Programs, and Projects that foster economic growth & development C.ITYlIMC433POIU•F1. . . • t- i ~ _a ~ ..Department of Community Development. ' : S'.pi"kaRe ~VaIde . Planning Division Q Priorities Encourage diverse & mutually supportive business . development & the expansion of existing businesses Encourage redevelopment of commercial/industrial . properties Promote a qualified labor force that is globally . competitive responding to changing workplace needs Develop recreational & cultural facilities and/or events . that will bring additional visitors to Spokane Valley and encourage regional tourism as a sustainable provider of jobs and markets cmHA(i~az or.ANc:t Department of Community Development. ~.Planning Divisi.on E:AU Mj ■ a or Policy Issues ❖ In conjunction with the Spokane Valley Charnber of Commerce, the Spokane Economic Development Corporation, and local institutions of higher education, support market feasibility studies to identify and target economic opportunities. ❖ Develop a comprehensive marketing strategy customized for the Spokane Valley and supportive of regional economic development objectives. ❖ Establish an interactive web-based geographic information system to facilitate economic research for business. ` ~J 0 D ~ - Ccii.ltEOSedu~..v~v. I)' • ~i~t1l --,~C ~ rt~r epartment of Communi.ty Development S'p",~~,o~aa~e . Valle ~ Planning nivision Co-,,r-~,1,,prr,e.he.,~nis"i"ve I~ ~n : I , , Emviron a NJ►t~ u r~-__ a~ I~ e n t~- ~ ee~ . t a.,~_~O~v rv i e~wt _~1~1~J~~ January 18, 2005 ' "Gf'Yll,hllp'ePOKANLV.. - - ' " ;T . Department c~f Communit.y. Develop ment- I Planrring.Division ' . ~ G-jMA ~ n ~ ~ ~ Re-, q3uireA e1 s ❖ Optional (but recommended) Element ❖ Consistent with CWPP's ❖ Critical areas: wetlands, aquifer recharge and groundwater, fish & wildlife habitat, flooded areas, geologically hazardous areas, s u rf a ce wate r ❖ Shoreline Master Program , v P b~~ ~ - r'"`:°"@5"~Nf°. Dcpartment of Community Development • ~ ~..JmCiJ.I\+ - . _ . : , . . po. ~~'~e- Planning nivision .a r s u~e~s M J ~ o r o _ c yj s Critical areas designations . ❖ Shoreline designations ❖ Development standards ❖ Aquifer protection Department of Cornmunity' :Development ~ , ane - ~ , ~ Planning Division . ...n.. M . . . : ~ ~ . C o-) pj-) e~ h el, n~ s i v ~ e ..l P I ~ - ► n~ _ l r ; r _..1 I~ ~ ! s ~ _1 , . w-) v e. rr, J i e w January 18, 2005 , - - CQY11,1itn3lcJY.AnCV. ~ _ ~ , - E~laepartment of Community I)cvclopment Planning Division w G e4 r u~ r~~ e~ n~ _ ❖ Required Element ❖ Consistent with CWPP's Must include: . ✓ Estimates of parks & recreation demands for at least 10 years; ✓ Evaluation of facilities and service needs; and ✓ Evaluation of intergovernmental coordination opportunities ❖ Also discussed in Capital Facilities Element ❖ Parks & Recreation Master Plan being prepared by Parks Department CtItNAUf9seok: Nr;v.- S ' ' . . , Departm~ent of Cammunity Development . i ~ '~a Planning Division M O P ~ r ~ Issue r o ~ ❖ Parks & recreation level of service ❖ Coordination with other service providers: ✓ Co u nty; ✓ School districts; ✓ Sports associations; ✓Others. ❖ Consistency with Parks & Recreation Master Plan 'i , : . i 10 ctrtlinl~4srorw[•1. _ , ' ~ - Department of Gommunity Development S"~ikane Planning DiviSion . ; . ~ i ~ ~u~~s ~~~o-)n.f nRAFr ADVANCE AGENTaA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as <yf .Txnuary 13, 2005 2:00 p.m. Please nnte this is a work in pr4gress; ilems are tentative "1'0: Council & Staff From: City Manager fte: llraft Schedule for Upcominb Council Meetings .Tanuar-V 19, 2005 - Conversa6on with the Communit-,,, 6 p•m., Sports USA JanuarV 25, 2005, Reeular Meetin? 6:00 p.m. idue datc Thursday, Jariuary 131 l. PUBLIC HLA1tfiVG:1'ineslMansfiEld Development A~.~reements -Neil Kersten [20 minutes] 2. Second Reading: f'roposed Area-wide Rezone N Greenacres area (REZ 17-04)-Scott Kuhta [25 minutes) 3. Proposed Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan - Scott Kuhta [45 minutes] a. Sccond Reading, Qrdinance 04-049, CPA 0 1-04 b. Second Reading, Ordinance 04-050, CI'A 02-04 e. Seconcl Reading, Ordinance 04-05 1, CPA 03-04 d. Secand Reading, Ordinance 04-052, CI'A 05-04 e. Secand Reading, Ordinanec 04-053, CPA 08-04 4. Proposed First Reading Ordinance re S. Side of 13roadway Avenue, CPA 04-04 - Scott Kuhta [10 minute.,s] 5. Proposed First 12eading Ordinance re East side of Adams Ro3d, CPA 06-04 - Scott Kuhta [10 111 inutes] 6. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting Framewrork for Development Code - Marina Sukup [10 mins] , J 7. Administrtitive Report, a. Sign Rcgulations -Marina Sukup [20 minutes] 8. Tnformation Only: a. llepartmental Monthly 12eports b. Plannina Commission Minutes (cstimated meetin};: 140 minutes*J ' FebruarV 1, 2005, ,Toint 1'ieeting/Studv Session 6:00 p.m. [due clate Thursday, Jariuary 20 ] Joint Meeting: City Council and PlanninS Commission: Core Values as they APpIy to the Comprehensive Plan -Nina Regor (150 minutes) 'f OTAI, ,VIT(Y UT F_S: 150 Ivlax. mtg. time: 150 minutes FeUruarv 8, 2005, ReQOlst• Nleeting 6:00 p.m. [duc date Thursday, .lanuary 271 1. First IZeading Proposed Sien Ordinance - Marina Sukup [10 minuce,s] 2. First Rcading Proposed Garage Sale Ordinance - Cary Driskell [10 minuLes] 3. Motion Consideration: PinesJMansfield Development Agreement(s) -Neil Kersten [10 minutes:~ 4. Motion Consideration: Appoinlment Recommendations, Loclging Tiix Advisory Committee - Cnuncilmember Flanigan []0 minutesJ 5. Administr►cive Reporis: a. 'Cax [ncrement Financing - Econnmic Development Cnuncil [20 minutes:l ,---.1 b. Alternatives to lncarceration - Caiy 17riskeU [20 minutes:l c. Street Vacation Ordinance Amendment Discussion - Caiy Uriskell [10 minutes] d. I-lazard Mitigation I'lan $riefing - ularina Sukup [20 minutes:l e. Scormwater Orclinance - John Hohman [20 minutes] [estimaietl meetiug: 130 minutcs*] praft Advance Agenda 1/13/2005 2:18 PM Pagc 1 of3 Februs►ry 12, 2005 - Winter CouociUStaff .L2etreat, 9 a.m. - 1:00 n.m. "!'erilutive Tcipic,s: Financia! forecast; wurk plun/strutcgic plan; brairrstorrrritig for gouls/project; munaged competitiori; draft budget calendur; legislutive issi.res ~ TElVTA TTVE: Tebruary 15,2005. time: TRA, F:.Cn\'orthwest Update Februyrv 15, 2005. Study Sessinn 6:00 p.m. [clue d.ite Tnursclay, Februar,y 3) L Spokane Housing Authority Presentation - Diane Quast, William Zeck (cofrfirnred) (15 minutes) 2. Cable I"ranchise Update -Nlina Regor/Ulorgan Koudelka (15 minutes) 3. Update nn 2005 Contracts with Spokane County - Morban Kaudelka (15 minutes) 4. Prism/PluslPadal (Parcel Data Locator) System - Marina Sukup (1 S minutes) 5. Review of Comprehensive Plan Llcments (Land Use, Transportation) -iMarina Sukup (60 minutes) 6. ECON'orthwest Brie.fing - Marina Sukup (20 minutes) TOTAII M[NUTES: 140 Max. mcg, time: ] 50 minutes February 16-17, 2005 Cih' Legislative Action Cnnference (CLAC) rlssociation of Washington Cities Red Lion Olympia lqoteL Olympia, `Va. February 22, 2005, Retular l!Ieeting 6:00 p.m. (duc datc Tharsdsy, February 101 , 1. Second Reading Proposed Garage Sale OrdioanCe - Cary Driskell [10 minutes] 2. Second IZeading Propasecl Sign Ordinance - Marina Sukup [20 minutcs] 3. First Reading Proposed Street Vacation Ordinance Amendmen[ - Cary Driskell [10 minutes] 4, i'irst Reading Proposed Stormwater Ordinance_ (formerly # 04-007 iiiitial first reading 02-24-04)- Neil Kersten [20 minutes] 5. First Reading Pronnsed Pawn Shop Ordinance - Cal Walker [10 minutes] 6. Infonnation Only: a. DepartmenCal MonChly Reports; b. Planning Commission Minutes [estimated meeting: 70 minutes*) R7arch 1, 2005, Stuclv Sessinn 6:00 p.m. (due datc 1 hursd3y, February 17 ] 1. Review of Washington Slatutes on Taisincorporation- Cary Driskell (20 miriutes) 2. Watcr Safet), Regulations Discussion - Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3. Helmet Safety Tssuc Research Update - Cary Driskel I (10 minutes) 4. Review of Comprehensive !?lan Elements (Capital FaciliiiES) (60 minutes) 5. Stxeet Paving Funding Option - Neil Kerstcn (Gary Schimmels) . •(15 minutes) 6. Presentation: E'rocess Mapping - Nina Regor/Marina Sukup/Neil Kersten (15 minutes) TQTAL y1NiJTES: 130 Max. mtg. time: 150 minutes A'19rch 8, 2005, Regular Mceting 6:00 n•m. [due date Thursdsiy, February 241 1. $econd Reading Proposcd Str4et Vacation Qrdinance Amendment - Cary Driskell [ 10 minutesJ 2. Second Reaciing Proposed Stormwater Ordinance-Neil Kersten [lU minutesJ ' 3. Second Reading Proposed I'awn Shop Ordinance-Cal Walker [lU minutes:) 4. Mazard Mitigacion Plan - Marina Sukun [20 minuces] 5. Matrix Schedule Perinitted Uses - tilarina Sukup [20 minutes] [cs[imated meeting: 70 minutes*] llmfl Advanee Apeiida 1/13/2005 2:18 PM Page 2 of3 4 1Vlareh 11 - 15,2005 Conj!ressional Citv Cnnf'ercnce, Wa.shinaton D.C. ~ ~ ~ Mareh 15, 2005, \'O MEFT'IIVG Marcli 22, 2005, Regular Meetin?_ 6:00 n.m. [due date Thursday, Mfu•ch lUJ 1. 1-Ia7ard Mitigation Plan-Mnrina Sukup IA 5 minutes] 2. A/latrix Schedule Pennitted Uses - iVlarina Sukup [l 5 minutes] 3. Llformation Qnly: a. lleparimental Monthl_y Reports; b. Plannirig Commissinn Minutes [estimated meeting: _ minutes$] iVlarch 29, 2005 Study Session 6:00 p.m. I due date Thursday, i1'IHrch 17] 1. TrafFc ControUSpecial E4•en~s - Cal Walker/Mike Jaekson (20 rninutes) April 5, 2005, Study Session, 6:00 n•m. [due date ThursdHy, 1Vlarch 2411 April 9,2005 - Mavor's Ball April 12, 2005, Regial.n• Meetina 6:00 p.m. [due date Thursday, March 31.] \ i April 19, 2005, Study Session, 6:00 n.m. [due date Thursday, April 7] Fair Board Presentation (tentative) (15 minutes) April 26, 2004, Keaulsr Meetin!! 6:00 p.m. (due date Thurstlay, April 141 1. lnformation Only: a. Departmental Monthly R.cports; b. Planning Conunissiori Minutcs [estimatcd meetinb: _ minutes*] QTAER PrNDiNG Ar\''ll/OF2 UYCOiN'IING ISSUES: Sccond R.eacling Prnposed Sidewalk Ordinance 04-012 -(first reading 02-24-04) Panhandling - Cal Walker via.SSage Parlors/Bath Houses - Cal Walker May 10, 2005 - all elcmcnts Comprehensive F'lan Uiscussion (again May 24, 2005) June 11, 2005 -Mid-Year Council/Staff Retreat, 9 a.m. - noon Annexation [ssue.s - Nina Rcgor Regional Stonnwater Desigii Manual - John Hohman InitiativelReferendum MEETL1`GS TO BE SCNEllULED l open house -wastewatcr issues (To Be Announced) estiniated meeting time does »ot include time for public cnmments] Draft Advance Agenda 1/13f2005 2:1$ PiM Pege 3 of 3