2005, 02-22 Regular Meeting
~
aGENDA
SPOKA-NE VALLEYCI"IY COL'NC:IL
REGC?L.4R NIEETItiG #61
Tursdnv, Februar% 22.21105 6:00 p.m.
C'ITl' AALI. A7 RE:I)N'Opp PI.AT.A
11701 k:ixt lpra};ue Avenuc. First Floor
Cuunril Reqursts All E:Icctronir I)rviccs I►r T urncd OlTT)urink Cnunril M1lcetins;
CALL TO nRDFR
(tiN'OCATIUN: Patitot lium I-c+:.trr. t"allr~poi►it aa Piuc-=
PLEIICE OF A1.LEGIANCL
ROU, CAI.I_
4PPRC)1'AL OF ACENDA
j1'7RppLi(`nnti OF SPECLAI. GLTESTS AtiD FRESF.NT.ATlO\ti
('(?Ml►'[[T'fEE. IiOARi1. LIAISnN SiTTMAR1' REPORTS
NLaYOCt'5 ttEPOR'1:
PUBLIC CUri !~1 ENT~ fur .iinnhff Lo.>1 t;;c• l'ubli': [t, -,peal ti, ?iir onuzci: r:-~aniinv nLaite:- NU7 un
thr Agenda. F'Iwst statc your namc and address lor tlic recotci aud lunst ren:irls tu threc uunuIc,
1. CO'.VSEh"T AGENDA Consists of iums considcrcd routine which src approvcd as agr:-u; Ak
Cuuu. ilmenibcr may tamove na itrm fmtu ths: Couscnt Agcnda tu Lic considrrcxi separatel
(Notr: Coudcil ma' catcrta[n n wution to Naivc rcadiag and approvr Cuaxcnt Agenda.i
Approral of Rrgviaz Council Mcdingtilinutrs «f Fcbnuxry• k, 200;
i). ApprovaI of Cauacil Worlcxhap Nates of T'ebtuarT 12, 2AUS
c Approvnl of Cowicil Scudy Session Nimucrs of F'c.-bnutry I;. 200;
d Approval ofFayratl ofFrbruary 15. 2005:i i 510W,S34.^_0
c lnproval of thc Fullov►•ing Vourhrrs:
~ c_~LrC1•iIIt L1ST vOUCIim TUTAL
DATE Numbcx(a) VOUCHFR
AMULINJ
. ~'12-04-OS ~ 62,59•6293 (lcss 62081 1 6~.5S1.9fi
102-11-05 6~~-b326 +98,330_64
~ GRA_hv T()"('.4L ~ 4 r,0,u! 2.00 ,
OLI) Bt~S1NE:S5:
2. iJattnishrd Busines,_,-_ Tabletl hcn;. I.udging Tax Advisor; Cummitite App-witrtir»' r)►uc::t WilLitc
(puhlir camroentJ
!YEW BlJ41NESS
I rirst Reading Prvposrci Ucdinaucc 05•011 I'lacuYL On E3ailot, Anncxaiion to Spoknne Co. I..ibrary
District - Nina Rcxut [puhlic commcoti
Fitst Rending t'Topascd Stnrniwater Ordinance U5-013 - John l tolunaa Ipnblic cnmmcatl
S Mution Consideretion: GAA Pctition - rtina Regor [public commeatl
r; winuan Con}idcration: LvcuI Agc»cy Agrecmcnt, T'ederal Aid Pmject hms►ectus - StevY VVorlev
a Dishmnn-Mica Road Project (puhllc commcntl
b. Hmaciw3y Pmjact (public commentl
c APpieway f'mject Ipuhlic romment I
PL'6LIC CONLNIFNTS ilo: ;iiemhrr, o: tht• !'ublic tti -;i eak t,, t-lic c nuncil regarding mat;c;s NOT' on
t6e Agenda Pfease st::tc v+,ur nimc and <<ddres firr thr -ec«rcl , n(3 h tnit rrmarLs :t , thrrc rII 1:1ut.,.
Ann1tNIsTRaTnT KEruRT_S:_ ~~lt-) PuN!t L ,111,,,C,!c]
Rc«sivns to Nuisancx C'odr t.gHrggc sales► I
ti CcntcrPluct: I=ibc- ( ormcc:tion -!vt:k-c );}cG. .
I1TFC}R:'1iA1I0N 011.ti : Ino public .:ommcntJ
9. Depamncntal Monthlr. ficpcros
10. Pianning Cammissicm Minutes:lanuary 13, 2005
11 _ Nptes from C'uuncil,'Planning Couunission Jcint Meetitg of Fehnuiry 1, 2005
12 Spokunc County Libran Dislrict Januatti• 2005 Report
~.1~ Ir►l 1:"~~I1 ~ I
Regular Counci!
Counc!l Study SGSSions art grntrrilly hek' . ,
fAthgr Tcntatit-ep t jxon~lnt!4fcrtixg./F__►r~;
Marr.h 1, 2005- Freectman,Tung fi Bott~snll'Ot. i. . , ~ ...<<_..
March 1 l - IS, 2005 - Congressiana! City Confemnc.c, Washingtan, D.C.
%far-ch 15, 2005 - No Cuuncll Mocti.ng ar Study Scssiaa
pril 14, 2005 - Convcrsatinn witb thc Cvmmunity, 6 p_m_ Prdtt Elcrticutary, 6903 E4Avc
.luT1C i I.2905 -%,1C:if (70L11);'iI ',,K:[t.'C,'?, q:i 1I1 - i1ooI1
N017( 2. ltLtn..i:lu.:it~;~n~.,i~E i.1ttrniI Lx tnc:;ut} ,~hc nac':inl 10 .tc-In: n0t:A:r i,;;~uc.trinf..,; ,thcr I
riTTjriiTlilCrlti plC:tc.c tn.1 t}u: ( II, Clerk nt l5001 9: f-~~If~l~ 5no7Y<'~u•tir~i~r .5.':31w::tiirnri tnm ~c t1WlltL J
17raft
A7TNUTES City Ut Spokftne Valley
City Council Rcgular Meeting
1'ucsday, Februar-y 2005
Deputy Mayor l7unsc,n called ttie meefinz to order at 6:00 p.m., aud welcomed everyone to the 60"'
meeting.
Atteridance:
Councilmembers: StHff:
Rich Munson, T)eputy A4ayor Taavc. Mercier, Cit}= A9anaoer
Stcve Taylor, Councilmernber Cary Iariskcll, Ucputy City Att4rney
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance Uirector
Mike Flanigaei, Councilmember Nina Regor, Deputy City vianager
Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works llirector •
Dick Denenny, Councilmember iblike Jackson, Parks and Rrcreation Uirector
Ivlorgan Koudelka, Admin.isualive Analyst
Absent: Tc,m Schollens, Build'uig Official
Diana Williite, n4ayor Chris Bainbridae, City Clerk
1N1'dCATlON: Pastor Manucl Denning, Fountain iv9inis2ries gave the invocation.
PLEDGE OT A.T..T.,EGIANCE: Councilmember Schimenels led t.he; Pleclge of Alleaia~~ce
ROI.,I, CAL11 It was moved by Councihnember-.DEYleming and seconded by Caturcilmember Flartigan
io excuse Maynr 9,71hite from torliglrt's meeting. Vcite fiy Acclumution: hi Fm~or: Cinanim~,us. Opposed:
None. Abstentr'ons:None. 1Yfotiurt curr•ierl. City Clerk Bainbridge called the rall; tjll present exccpt
excused Mayor Wi]hice.
AE'1'RON'AL QF AGENDA
City Manager Mercier said he tirould like to amend the agenda to include c;xpansion of new busi.ness item
#5 to allaw for items 5a-5g which woulcl be propnsed mitigation agreetnents for the 1'ines/Mansf eld
Road construction projeet. It was moved Uy Cotatcilmember Denenrry and secaided by Cvuricilrnemher
Taylor to appro>>e the ametrdetl ugencla. Vote by Acclanratioit: 1n Fcrvor: Uriunimous. Opposed: Nof►e.
Ah,rtentions: 1Vone. Motion curried.
T~'TRnT,)UCt'ION OF SPECLAL GLJCSTS AND Plt:I+~SEN1:ATlONS
C0119:MITTEL. BOARD, Lir1,TSQN SUNA9A1tY REPORT'S
Councilmember Denennv: siated that he attcn<lcd last week's S7'A firiance committee where they had
general presentaiions for their concluding vear; and also reviewecl same new routing; and that he also
aLtendut the annual CVB meeting.
Councilmember Tavlor: explained that he met with County CommissiCner Iviark Richard and Spokane
Housing staff to discuss the CDI3G funtiing process for this year and fut:ure options.
Councilmember Schimmels: report.ed [hat he atteuded the recen[ so]_id waste board meeiing; [he Planning
Commission last week; and the Greeciacres neighborhood meeting a few weeks ago where there was w
interestint preseniation from an architect worl:ing with tUat group and that ihey had a change in direction
ac2d are look.ing at [he area as whole Council Meeting: 02-08-05 PFige 1 of b
Approved by CAUncil:
Draft
lleput.y Mavor Munsan: said that he actended the Liaht Rail Steering Committee where lhey cliseusscxl the ,
,
future of light rail and the next steps; lbat they are slill in the planning stages but by October that ~
committee will make a reconvnendation t4 the STA Roard of llirectc,rs of the best choice for che shape
and look of the light rail project.
1VLA1'QR'S RF,POf2T:
PU}3I.IC COMT9:ENTS Dcpury Mayor Munson invited public eomment. No comn►ents were affereci.
1. CONSENT AGENDA Consists Qf items consiclered rqutine which tire approved as a group. A
Councilmembcr may remove an item from tlie Consent Agenda to be considere<l separately.
(NoCe: Council may entertain a motion to waive reading flnd approve Concent Agcnda.)
a. Approval of Regular Council lvieeting Minutes of January 25, 2005
b. Approval of Payroll of January 31, 2005 of $143,535.72
c. Approval of the FollowinL Vouchers:
VOUCWER I,1ST VOUCWIaR TOTAI.:
Ia.4TE Number(s) VpUCHETt
AIvfOUNT
01-21-05 6192-6218 51,334.56
01-28-05 6220-6245 443,956.63
GRAINM TQT.AL 495,291.19
It was maved by Councilmember Denenny, seconded b}, Councilmember Flanigan, and turanimocisly
agreed upun to wafve the readi►rg rrnd approve tlre con.sent agenda as stated.
%
,IEW B[JSINESS •
2. First RGading Pronosed OrdinanCe: 05-009 Amending Criminal Code (n4ise) - Carv Driskell
After City Clerk BainbridLe read the ordinance title, Iaeputy C:ity Attomey Driskcll explained that che
regulations regarding noise did not include khe right-of-way, and the proposed amendment wouid make
the same regulations applicable to noise eiuanating &om public acid private rights-of-way. !t was moved
6}, Councilmember DeVleming and secondecl by Councilmember Taylnr to.stt.spend tlte rules aitd approve
ordinarlce 05-009. I7eputy Mayor Munson invited public comment; no cornments were offered. Vuae by
Acclumution' In Favor: Unanimou.s. Opposed: A'one. Abslentions: _None. Alotion carrietl.
3. rirst Reading 11'roposed prdinance 05-010 Creating
_ Assessment Rei.mbunement .Area - Carv Driskell
After City Clerk .l3ainbridge rE:ad the ordinance title, Deputy City Attoruey Driskell explained that
Council was providiad with information January 25, 2005 concerning RCW 35.72 wliich would allow the
City to finance some transportatiou improvemcnLq in conuection vwith new development; tbat. ttus would
involve adopcinb an enabling ordinance and if adopted, rcimbursement assessment areas could be
established; and [hat this would be a good tool to use in fuCure developnients but aecause of the timeframe
involved, would not be used for lhc Pines/Vlansfield Raad projects. /t was rnoved by C'ouncrlnrenrber
Uenenr?v uncl seeonutecl by Councilmember Taylor ta uclvunee ordiirai:ce. 05-010 to a secoiid reading.
Deput}, Mayor Munson invited public comment; no cotnments were offered. Votc hy Acclarnar.ion: In
Favor: Uiianimuus. Opposed: ATone. AbsteittionS: Arone. Motio►i carried.
4. Pronosed Resolution 05-002 VJashington Economic. Iaevelopment Financ;e tlutbority - laave Mercier
AAer City Clerk 13ainbridge read the resolution title, City Manager Mercier explained tliat it is the_ policy
of the WrDFA (Washingnon Ecanorn.ic Developmcnt Finance ,Authoi'ity) Board only to issue bonds in ~
support of projects which would be welcomed by ilie local community; and as part af the issuance
process, t.he RrEDFA would like the Spokane Valley City Council as the pla.nning jurisdiction, to consider
Council A4eeting: 62-0E-05 Paee ? of 6
Approvoci by C;ouncil:
Draft
passage of 3 planning jurisdiction approval resotuticin to issue uix-exempt economic clevelopment revenue
bouds; that pass:ibc of this resolution does not require any pledge of the city's revenues, but. allows us the
c()urLc;sy lo weigb in on the praject. It wus mo»ed by Courlcilrnember DelTlemrng and seconded hy
C'ouncilmeirrher Schimniels to table this issue trirtrl alicy rrext »lG'GflJJg. Vote by Accltr»iatinn: Irt Favor.-
Cozrncibnembers Delrleminb ancl Schimmels; Opposed : Depiut, Muyiar Miursan, and Courrcrhnembers
Tcrylr„•, Flanigan, arid Deneniry. The nrotion.JurJed. It ti+ias ilren moved by Cotutcilnremher Taylor atad
secoirded b>> Councilmember F-Taiiigair io adopt Resolirtro+i 05-002. Iaeputy AZayor Munsoit invit.etl
public comment.
Tony Lazanis: said he doesn't understand the purpose of this resolurion and feels council doesn't either;
and wants further explanzjtion.
Councilmember DeVleming s[ated i.hat he: wUulcl like to see what the project is going to loek Like and
wduld l.ike to see more details in the future and prefers havi.ng more than one tauch on issuas. Vc,te bv
Acclaniatioir; Ir2 Favnr°; Unanimous. Oppose& Alone. Abstention.s~ A7one. Motir~n ccrrried,
5. Ntol.ion Consideratian: PineslVlansfield Development Agreements - Nleil Kersten
Public Work-s Diractor Kersteri expiained the histary, including the public hearinD on the, niit.igation
agreement; and stated that we have signed agreemenLq fmm Centennial for 51,730; f'inecroft at
S151.917; AcCA Construction for $60,358; SVG View Rancb Estates f'or $28,222; Nori.hwood 1'roperties
for $1,821, Qualchan Invest.men[ for $54,926, and AZirabeau Chapel for $1,821; leaving unsi~=ned
a;reements f.rom developers Thomas Hamilton with twa picces of prnperiy, and Grant Person who
iudicateci he would sion; all which leaves a sliortfall of $53,196.
Ic wtrs nroved htJ Cuuncilnremher-.Denenn~y und secnnded, that the Cdn~ iiicrease its Pai•tieipation in the
"Mitrgutiorr Agreemenr, SR 27 (Pnes Rond) A9nnsfreld Road Cotistnrctint: Prqject " b); up io $53,196,
which »ray be reduced .rlrould Tlrontas Hamilton atid/or J Gratrt 1'ersai file with the Cin, Clerk„ tl:eir
re.spective mitigatiota agreement.r by 4:30 p.m., Friday, Feh 11, ?OO.i, the final subrniit.al oppnrrunityfvr
their participat.ion in said rnitioatlon ctgreement. 17eputy Mayor Munsnn iilvited puhlic comment.
Carlos Landa_ 2910 r 13`h Aveiiue: expresseci apprueiation ta Couneil for the manner used in tianclling the
issue.
There was brief discussion on the merits af this motion. lloce Uy AcclQmation: la Favor: Unanimous.
Opposed: Nu►re. AbstEntions: Nvne. Motiatr curried.
,ation Apreement; Center.tnial PropertiES, Ine.
Sa. Mitip
It tivu.c moverl bt, Cocrncilnumber FIatTigmi and secortded by Corutcilmember DenemTy Ihat the Couflcil
uccepr the "Mitigation Ag•eemerit, SR 27 (Pitres Road) etlansfield Rocid Construction I'i°oject " benveen
the Crty and CencennrQl Properties, liic., dutecl Februa►y 8, 2005, in the amoturt of $151,730. and
autlrvri=c the Ciry Manager to execute said agreemei:t. lleput-y Mayor Munson invited public comment;
no commeiits were offered. Vote !yv .Acclcematiu+r: In.Fa>>ar: Unm:i.nwus. Dpposed: None. Abslentinns:
Nonc. M'utiorr carried.
Sb. MitiQation A^reement: Pinecraf[, T LC
It was mo%,ed 4v Cottitcilmeinher Denenny ancl secorJded Ihat the Coirifcil accept the "Mitigat.ioff
Agr•eentent, SIZ 27 (1''iyies f2oad) A9ansfield Roud Cortsu-uctiun Prvject " benween the City rliicl Piiiecroft, ,
LLC, clated Febt°uary S, 2005, in the amocrnt of$151,917, aiad airrltnrrae the City rlqartager t.o e.xecute sard
trgr-eement. Deputy Mayor Iviunson invited public conunent; no comments were off'ered. 1''ote. 4>>
Acc.lantation: In 1"trvor: Uiianimaus. Opposed.• 1Vane_ .Abstenticins: 1\ronE. 1td'otiolr carrred.
Council Meeting: 02-08-05 Page 3 of 6
Approved by Council:
Drai1
5c. Mit.igation Agreement: ,A R A Cans[ruction & Developmenl, 1nc.
It was n:ovecl hy Cauncilnaembe►- Flanigtirl and secvndecl hy Councibrrember TUylnr alrat rlie CUL(i1C1I ~
accept the "Mitigat.ion ilgreentent, S'K 27 (Pines Roud) Mnirsfield Road Con.rtruction Project " benveen ~
the City and r1 & A Canstruc.iion Development, Inc. cluted February 8, 2005, in the amount Cif,6((J,388,
and authorize the Citv iVanager to execiite said agreemeni. lleputy Mayror Munson invited public
c;omment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclnmation: In Fuvor.• Unanimous. Opposed: None.
Abstentions: 1Vone. 111otirn carried.
Sd_ Mitieation Affreement: SVG-View Ranch 'states, LLC
It was moved by Councilmember Taylar und secorzded that the Coiufcil accepi the "1Vitigation
Agreemetrr, SJt 27 (1'ines koad) ji9ansfield IZoad Construction Frajeci" betwesrr the Cit.y and SVG-Vie1+,
Ratrcla Estates, LLC, duted Februnry 8, 2005, i►r the amount oJ,~28,222, a»d aerlhorize the Ciry Mattuger
to Fxecute said agreement. I)eputy Mayor Alunson invil.ed public comment; no commenCs were offered.
ffote by Acclaniatinn: In Favor: Unanimuus. Opposed.• Arate. Abstentians: IVoite. M. orion can-iecl.
5e. Mitigation Agreement: Northwood F'roperties
It was moved by Cntnicilmemher• Taylor and scc,nnded thnt the Council accept the "Mitigation
Agreenrent, ,SR 27 (Pities Road) Mansfceld Rnacl Consiruciion Pr-ojecr " hetween the City and i\r~,rthwoorl
Properties, dated Februan% 8, 2005, in the aniount af ,SI,S21 and autliorize the Cin, Afmiager io e.xecute
said agreement. Depun' Mayor Nlunson invited puhiic comment; no cnmments were offered. TJOte by
Acclamatian: Itr Favnr: Utim:imous. Opposecl.' 1Vone. _Abstentions: None. Motion curriecl.
Sf. Mitigation Azreement: Mirabeau Cbapel
It was mvved by Councilmember Schimmels and seconded b}f Cocnrcilmember 7'aylor that the Cauncil
ucc•ept the "Mztigadion Agreement, SX 27 (Pines Roud) Mansfield Xond Construction Project" benveen
the Citv mid Mirubeau ChoJiel, dated Februury 8, 2005, in tlte aniount of $1,821 und auth.nrize the City '
Manager- to exectrte said agreement. laeputy ylayor Munson invited public conunent; no comments were
offered. Vote by Acclumution' In Favor: Unm:imous. Ofaposed.• Notte. Abstentiais: Notie. JVotr:on
carrieci.
St. M.itiQation AQreement: (aualchan Investment Spbkane, Inc.
It wa.c moved by Cottrrcilmenrber 7aylor mid secvnclecl by Couneilmember Derrenny thai the Council
accept the "iVilcgation Rgreement, S7l Z% (Pincs Road) IVlansfield Ruad Construction .Project" betrveen
the Citv and Qaralchun Lrvestment SpoR:nne, Iric, datc'd Febnuarv 8, 2005, in the amount of S54,926 and
autliorize the City Mannger t.o exerute suid ugreement.. Deputy Mayor Munson invited public cqmrnenl;
no commcnts were offered. Vote by Acclmnalion: In Favor: Unanintotts. Opposed: None. Abstentions:
1Vorte. Motiai carried.
6. Motion COnsideration: L.ocal AgencY A~,meement and Federal Aid ProjecG Prospectus - Neil Kerstcn
Yublic Works Director Kersten explained that a grant was rccentl_y approved from SRTC for $1.6 million
that completes the fiincling package for the Pines/Mansfield Coeridor Congestion kelief Project; and that
the attached Local ALCncy Ageeement and Project Prospectus must be signed for grant processing and
final approval. It tivru• nioved ky Councilmentber- Flunigair and .seconded to nuthorize the Cit.v ?Ilanager io
Execute the locai ngency ugreement and project prospectus for the pineslUansfield Project. Deputy
Mayor Munson invited public comment; no conunents were affcrc;cl. Vare hy Acclamation: Ir: Fuvor-:
tlnanimous. Opposed: 11Tarre. Ahstentions: Rrone. Mr,ition currred.
7. tilotion Consideration: Appointme.nt Recommendations
a. Cable Advisorv Committee - \
Depuly Iviayor tifunson explained [hat. Richard Young has submitlcd an application for appointmcnt
consideration io the Cable Advisory Corrunittee and that Mayor Wilhite proposed he be appointed. It tivas
Counci] iMeecing: 02-08-05 Page 4 of 6 .
Approved by Council:
Draft
moved hy CounciliriemUcr Deiaenrry und secoirrlecl hY Councilnzeiraber Tayla- tn c•o► frrrn the ntcryora(
appaint.nteial oj RicFrcrrd )'nurig to the Cable Aclvi_rory C'ommitaee.. Deputy Vlayor M.unsou invite:d rublic
conunent; no cornmenCS were ofTered. VotE hy Acclamcrtra,t: I,r Favor: Unani»ioi.rs. Opposed: Alare.
Absterttions: ATone. Molron carried.
h. Solid Wast.e ,qdvisor}, Board
It xyzs naoved 1ay Cuuncalmeiyiber S'cliintmels anrJ ,recoitded by Coi:urcilmemhei•,Taek7eming tn confirni the
nulyoral appoinimew ajAl'arc Torre to the Snlid K%aste f1d>>isory Board. Deputy tiiayor Alunson invited
rublic eommenr, no coniments were offered. Vote by .Acclamation: In Favrn•: Una,rrmou.s. Opposed:
nla,re. Abstenliorls: Notie. Motio,r carriccl.
c. Lotlging Tax Advisory Committ:ee
It ivus moverl by Coimcilmember Ttrylor uncl secotided by Cotuncil»rember- De Heniing io tahle this
appointtrie►rr utrrrl the ►rexr council meeting. 1%ote b), _Acclamution: In Favor: Deyuty lvlayor Munson attd
Councilmenibers S'chimmels, Trlylur, und Ue Henzing; Uppnserl: Councilmembers Dsnenny and.Flanigait.
Abstenlio»ts: .Norie. lllotiorr carried; matter tublecl to the next council meeting
ar
PUBLIC COMMF;NTS Depu[y Mayor Munson invited public comment.
Bob Blum. 12772 East 15"': said reaarding the public information pfficer itern on Saturday's agenda, that
he was a public information officer in the U.S. A.ir Force iind he values tUat position; but feels there are
ot.her higher priarities tlien havuig a public information off eer; and if there are additional funds, he would
prefer to liave aiiotlier eocle enforcement officer or two or anoiher staN' permit positian that would benefit
the ciry greater than a public infoniiation qfficer; and also thai he is a little disappointed nol to see the
"three t4uches" carried out on 1onight's previous agenda iiem.
~
Tany J azanis: startc;d asking about who was paying for the library annexation and as he was out of order;
Deputy Mayor Munson aske:ci him to retvm to lus seat.
Dick Beam. 3626 S]tidgevie~v: saicl he disagrees with Ivir. Blum about the public information officer and
feels tihat the gnod things this City dnes shoulcl bc shared with the public; and that just the
accomplis}iments in the past year are remarkable and tet) ti.mes mare than the citizens had before and the
public needs to know these things; and [hat he feels the position is very valuable and wnuld more than
make up for the cost.
Deputy Mayor vlunson called for a recess a[ 7:16 p.m.; and reconvened the ►neeting at 7:29 p.m.
AnA'ilT'TSTRATII'E REPOItTS: [no public conuneni]
S. tlltematives to lncarceration - Cary Iariskell
Iaeputy Cit:y Att.omcy introduced District Court Judge F'lese who spoke of the altematives to
incarceration, which are beino considered to acltiress jail overcrowding, which alt.ematives include ciay
reporting at Geigcr, wnrk release, tivork crew programs, viinors in Prevention Propram, and the 24-hour
program.
9. I.ntroductic►n DiscLission of Anneaatian iaito Spokane County Librarv llistrict - Nina Rerorl
Viorgan Koudelka
Via his Pnweryoini presentatian, Adrninistrative Analyst Koudelka explaiiied that at the November 30
meeting, Cou»cil ctirected staff ro prepare an annexatinii discussion in the latter part of 2005; that staff
began researchi.ng propcriy tax laws, and due io the co►nplex.itV of those litws as well as election tunino.,
considers bringing forward this informiition now. IVIr. Koudelka also explained the hijhliohts of his
Council Mccting: 02-08-05 Pagc 5 of 6
Approvcd by Council:
Draft
accompanyirig Februaly 3, 2005 memo. It was Council consensus t4 move fonvard with a fusc reading of
an amnexation ordinance. ~ i
10. Office Spacc Considerafions - Nina Regor
Deputy City tilanagcr Rcgor explained that this is just an informat.ion item on the building space and what
staff is considcring concerning expwsion of that space. City Manager Ivqercier saicl that wtaat he hopes to
gain tonight is perception that we stiould pursue an cxtended s[ay, or explore an extended stay in this
building; wd to determine if tllere is Counci] consensus to talk to the property owner and their
representative to extend the t.cnure in this building for another year or hvo; including heDin-ning to
accumulate somc actditionai siorage space and spaee for new staff; and that he feels the best way to secure
space is to address the subject now. It was council consensus lo move forward for securing additional
space.
P►1P~ORiMATIQN ONLY:
Ciry Viariager Mercier brought eoumcil att.ention to the drafr council retreat agencla, ancl said that we laok
forvvard to gathering together to address those topics.
There being no further business, it was movecl, seconded, and unacumously agreed upon to adjourn_ Ttie
meeting adjoumed at 8: 10 p.m.
Iaiana Wilhite, Mayor
AT"7'ES`I': .
Christine Eiainbridge, Cit_y Clerk
C:owtcil ,Vleetine: 02-OS-05 Pagc b of G
Approved by Ccyuncil:
Uraft
WC)RKSHQP NOTES
~ SFECLaL MLLTING I2ETIZCA'1'
Sf'O.KA.NTF VAT•LTY C[TY CQUNCiL
F'ebruary 12, 2005
9:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Attendance:
Couilcilmcmbcrs Staff
Diana Wilhite, Mayour Di►ve Mercier, City Manager
Rich Munson, [7eputy Mayor Nina Re,qr, Deputy Cin, Mgr
Dick Denenny, Councilmember Marina Sukup, Comm. Dev. Dir.
Vlike Flanigan; Councilmember KEn Thompson, Finance Director.
Mike TaeVleming, Councihnember Cary Driskcll, Depuh' City Attorney
Gary Schimmels, Councilmcmber .fohn I•[ohman; Senior Lngineer
Steve'I'aylor, Councilmembcr Mike Jackson, E'arks & RecreaCion Dircctor
geant
17a1e Gnliniin, Administ.rative Sere
Tom Scholtens, IIuilding Official
Chris .T3ainhridge; City Clerk
After Mayor Wilhit:c thanked everyone for coming, Deputy City Manager Regor explained that staffwill
highliDht the 2005 draft wrork plan, the fnancial fore.casi, the staffing plan, draft budtiet calendar and
remaining agenda it.cros, and added that the 2005 draft work plan is a carryover or continuation of the
2004 pr(ljects.
1. WOIU( YLAN RFVlFW:
Public Works: Engineer Hohman went avcr his section of the qlan as it relates to Council goal tt5; that
siaff reviewed the strategic plan, responsibilities and processes; most of which were adopted from the
County, and thal Chey will look at what they should be doing and how Ca do tliat in the most efficient
manner pnssible. He stated that stafP goal 42 under the six-year Transportation Improvement Protmam
upclate is primarily for arterial roads and proceeded to discuss the ncw projects as shown on his page nvo.
Ne also mentioned that there is a concern wiCh the aae of some, of the older roads in some sections, and
needs will be acldressed concerning re•placing, sealing, maintaining, etc,; that they have had general
discussions with the utilities but nothint sp£ciGc in aidina thcir a.5sistance in full-wictth paving.
Councilmcmbcr Flanigan said thac he woulcl lil:e more information in a future stud), se.ssion concerning
the poke_ntial of eroding improverneni districts in the neighboehoods. Councilmember 17eVleming added
that he would like to move forward wiGh a SI-reet matieer plan. Mr. HOhman rrtentipnecl staf!' is COnSiclc;ring
the possibility of submitting applications fnr S"1'A fimding for concrete inCersections, with specific
locations yet to be c3etermined, and that the applicatiAn deadline is FebruAry 28. It was Council consensus
lhat: staff sllould submit the necessary applications.
Cammunity Developrne.nt: Commwiit_y Development Dii-ector Sukup explained her portion of the plan
and said thac staff hopes to have am intern7ediate drafi soon of informational pamphlets; that there is
perhaps a need for additioniil zonirig dist:ricts; t11at the PlitIll1lna Commission has started work an the
matrices as several were outdated; and looks to the c.re.ation of an office zone; and thst she Iooks fonvar<I
to further discu.ssion later today concerning detining customer service; as the goal is to tailqr the
department's activities toward council's direction of gnod customer service. She explained that other
staff goals include getting the PLUS/PRISM system fully functional and have all appropriate staff trained
in its use. Nis. Sukup briefly mentianed the neetl for a hazard mit'igacion plan, nnd stated that plan will be
discussed more in detail at an upcomint council meeting. Councilmember Taylor asked how staff was
coming on the updating of zoning regularions in conjunecion with the comprehensive plan, and Ms. Sukup
A9ceting of 02- l2-0S Page I of S
Cotmtil Approveti:
llraft
replied that they izre worlcing on refining clcfinitions to ensure diat everyonc will be talking about the
same issue, anct addecl ihat lhe}, arc worlcing on definitions in conjunction with the land usc section. ln
respanse to DepLity Mayor Munson's quest:ion concerning a t.imeline for having the permitting
applications on our website, Ms. Sul:up said that scaff is warking on the process to hitve those things on
line, along with an explanation of prnccsses involved.
Parks aiid FtecrcitCion - Par4:s and kecreation llirector Jackson went over his section af'the Plan and
stated that the inventory Qf resourcES is nnw complete; lhat the needs assessment is about three-finurths
cornplete, ancl iiicludes surve_ys afi focus groupsJmeelirigs: he stated t.hat the}' have received about 300 of
the rcquiretl 400 reiurned surveys. He then e\plained the remainder of the worlc program and deparkment
t;oal, ineluding the goal of having t11e. CenterPlace grand openino held in conjunction with the September
24`h Valleyfest celebration.
Police- Adiiiinistrative Sergeant [7ale Golman reviewed the palice work program ancl goals, and
mentioned that there is a growing concern with gangs as the violence appears to be increasing; that
officials are working to make contact witli businesses and getting to know the criminal element. The
"Examination of jurisdictional recognicion, inclependet7ce and interabenc.y cooperatian" issue will be
elaborated upon during a firture council meeCirig/stucty session.
Qner<tcions ct Administrqtive Ser-vices - Deputy City Manager R.cgor explained the pper<<lions and
Admiiiistraeive. Services seciion, and ment:iqned that UZe five-year financial plan has no«< been eatended tq
a six-year plan; that several nf these it.ems are canyovers from the previous year; and that the Public
1.nformation Officer will be cliscusseci more +n detail further in today's agenda. There was brief discussion
conceriiing the neecl for opporhinilies for public input and whether those opportunities are suffaient.
2. Updstted Finsuicial Forec:tst - City Manager Mercier explained the updated financial forecast widi
st~3ff's continuetl pledge to reEine the i'orceast as situations change. He mentionecl that staff has closed the
deficit~s in 2005 ancl 2006 as shown hy the t.ransl'er lines on nage 1, but that will still be a challenge in
2007. "lhcre was discussion on revenues and eapenditures; and projections ancl estimates of what the
economy COUlCI dOJ1111-Atf CIO, and thai the apportuniry will come forward sevcral times a year for an
updated financial platt. Thei-e was also discussion on potential grov.,th and of the large jump in groNvth in
the unincorporated ares, keeping in mind that those numbers are estimates.
3. Staffing Plan - C;h, A9anager Ntercier gave the highlights of his memo: and stated that there is a need
to make some scaf-fing ehanges in order to cont:inue to provide the services citizens require and need; that
we have supUressed the number of employees in the Ueginning as we realized we had start-up debt ancl
wanted to liquidate that; thac we are in an improved financial situation, and to kcep pace with cusromer
cfcrn3nd, the.re are some staffing cpnsiderations. Mr. Ivlercier said that he wanted ro give notice that the
public works superintenderit position has been elirninated as that position ean better be served by the
scnior engineer for devclopmerit, adcling that the City continues to evaluate the other responsibilities
within the department and will make further recommendations in the future. Mr. Mercier then discussed
each position iri the scaffing plan, an<I explained the monetaty cliffe.rence of having an in-house attorney,
and the benefits of doing sa- i:inancial and otheitivise; of not asking law firms to split their allcoiance; and
of the benefit of the in-house attorney having just the one primary client. Nlr_ R1erc.ier said tliat stafC will
cantinue giving and asking for fecdback and consensus as t4 whicli positions to authorize to move
fon-ard, as they would like to start the ~n-ound Ntirork for these positions as it cakes time to go through the
hiring selection.
There was discussion concerniiia the ~~ttorne_v position; of the ~encral lack of need Por outside assistance,
but that IvLRSC is always a resourcc for all cities in the State, and if we are faced with an unusual
situation, we would recommend usc of an outside a=ency to get the appropriate expei-tise on a specialized
A4eeting of 02-12-05 Page ? of 5
Cnuncil Aprrovcd:
Draf1
' issue. It was CoLmcil conscnsus tO proceed with all positions as noted, excent the city attprney and ttie
I'ublic lnformation Officer. Ms. Regor said staff will move based on priorit}' nced, and will bring 1'orward
draft positions descriptions and start the process immediatt.ly.
4. llrafC budget calendar- it was felt that this it:em was self explanatory.
The group took a break at 10:35 a.rn. and rec.onvened at 10:45 a.m.
5 Stratcgic Planninp_ - Linda Oien, 13usincss 1'aths
Linda Qien discussed how in order to keep consislency af focus, stakeholders and constituents want to
know where wc are going, what do we st9r►cl for, believe in; and how are; we goirig to get there. She
discussed values; current priorities, what we,'ve done so far, and of the plans and vision for the future,
including the mission statement, strategies, goals; objectives, and building trust and leadership to create a
foundatinn of understanding and to set the (lirecti9n and tone of the City. She stated thai critical success
factors chat wiil clase the eap between where we are and where Nve nce.d to be should be accomplishe;d
over the next three to Five years atid it should be speeific, measurable, achievable, realistic, and time-
based.
Discussian flowed concerning how our 20.year comp plan fills segments of die sti-ategic plan; the focal
points af die comp plan, the physical aspects of the plari and of the• city, and the key strategies to
accomplish what is nccded; the council's goiils, the desire to be reactive or pro-active, proinoting regional
talks and COOpcraii0n; the need to give icleas bacl: to the cammunity of the creative process; resources
and/or the, lacl: thereof; transition from a construction phase to a vision stage; of sljaring information; of
promoting our goals; that we are not thc craficers of the plan but arc thc facilitators; and that this is a
communit), exercise.
~
~
6. T3rainstorminv Coiineil Goals/Proiect List for 2006 - City Manager Mercier brought council
attention to tF►c listi:d go31s for 2005, inclutlin~ the revisian to goal 43 listed on the reverse side of the
page; and of the attempt to loop all tlie golls too' e,iher in a compreriensive plan. We mentioned that this
surnmer's ►-etreat will look at the update.d financials and chat plan and that council can make changes
based on that inforination ilien; that he does not wanc to go through this year having pcople [hink Chis is
the Caroet for the year; Uut that: his scnse is ihat there are issLies lhat must be iaken into account beforc we
can understand what resources are available tc.) ernploy the goals.
Deputy ulayor NlutIson saicl he feels the ooals are stafF and not council-driven; and asked whzt kind of
goals do we wam: t.o tall: about; that he feels we don't have enough public input on ihese topics discussed;
• that the c•omments he hears are we don't lec ihe nublic give their ideas to such things iis t.he conip plan, the
eoals, and values; and he Would like to give people somethino to wQrk with and then give people an
opporlunily to express their itleas; and suagested more ad hoc committees for specific tasks.
Councilmember 'fayl0l' Sx1lCI tI7aC I]E d0E:S11'1: l1C8t' Cllflt; and feels we nffer numerous opportunities foe
public involvemenC, especifllly in shaping the comprehensive plan; and dhat tlie draft is filled wilh the
c;ommunity's comments.
Councilmember Denenny saict tl7ere caii be a great deal of publie input on a myriacl o1' issues like the
corridor, wastewater, sewer, ctc. and as an e•lected body, that we are che representatives of the people; and
we are the ones chac Nvill form tIIAL vision based upon our parcicipation in agendas like community
~ converstitions and other ineetings; that he wondered if fonning acl hoc committ:ces will dcfeac /he purpose
of the lang-standing committee if we invite and bring in those same people we hear o<<er and nver as
opposcd as [o a t:rue community-wide representatinn. Councilmetiiber Deiienny said One way to adclress
1he perceived lack of cnmmunication is to hire a publie information officer.
A4aeting of 02-12-05 P,igc 3 of S
Cauncil rlpprovcd:
Draft
M ayor Wilhite sziid that there is a balance of getting inf'ormation to the community; lhat the conversations
with tfie eommunity have poor attendaflee; that people are busy; and that perhaps ihere is a need for more
structure in those meetings, to have spec.ific topics and tn explaitt what has bccn done or needs co bt done.
Councilmember DeVlemint mentioned t:hat we only fill the ronm when the topic is one that people
disagree with - one which affects tt►eir pockeCbciol:s or their business; and Chat athei•wise, attendance is
very limitetl.
Msyor Wilhite said in regard t:o the comp plan; the Chamber says diey havc not been involved; yet wc are
agreeable Co provide inforrnation anti have staff av<<+lable to answer questions; that we are not setting up
thad committee, that ihe Chamber can if it desires ancl Nve will cio apresenta[ion for thern; that if there are
graups thac want to formalize to have impact on what we are doing; we'll provide Uiem the information
but she does nQt see a necd f'or ad hoe eomniittees. Ot.her suggestions for goals for 2006 ineludecl having
the process used ca draft the previoias goals; thac such go31s could be drafted at the June retreat; snd that
Councilmembers should submic any goal ideas to Deputy City Manager Regor.
7. Council Meetiny, Mariaf!ement Uiscussion was held concerning the meeting process for motions ancl
presentations; the rca.son for seekino public comrricnt, that public comment is not an opportunity for free-
flowing eonversation but for public cammenk; the "Itequest: for Council Action" Form and its included
motion suggestion; Ilic use of Rnberts Rules of Order; and of the desire to have a less strict decorum
during the sl:ud.y sessions.
8. A'ianaj!ed Comnetition: Ueput:y City Manager R.caor spoke of the managed competitinn pilot projcct
in 2004 with library services and park serviees; and started discussion concerning ihe bESt way to provide
services, including seeking feedback for what worl:etl ancl what did not wnrlc. Tcleas discussed for
manajed competicion included use of the County zis .i baseline comparisoo; tracking project costs; the
;
County's willintmess to compete (or not); suggesred fiuture projects of animal conTrol; (regional or
otherwise); road maintenance; weed maintenance; t:lie need for a street master plan; in-house options; and
stre£1 sweeping wheGher alone or in eonncetion with roa(l maiiitenance. Council staCed it would also like
a list of engineering services provicled b), the County aiid what we do in-house. It was Council consensus
to examine streec sweepinp and weecls.
9. Public Tnfbrmation oi'titer - Dep+aty City Man3ger Regor st:arCeci cliscussion on this topic. Discussinn
ideas included addressing where• complaints originate; Nvhac drives CQRlpIllllt5; response [irne; overall
satisf'action; turn-around times; call-back times; the I'(O as a support role lo convey rnessages; getting the
message to the communiry and focus on tfie overall picture; Councilmembers as eleeted PIOs; hiring
snec.ific cnnsultants for spzciEic; projects; contact Nvith aIl riiedia forms; creaCinD informational brochures;
use of the Pf0 as an ombudsman; and the necd for a I'IO now or lalcr. It was CoLulcil conseiisus to move
for%vard to hire the position. City Manager Mercier stated that the position descriplion will be drafted for
council review, and the position will be added to t:he list to initiat:c the process and prepare the budget; antf
that 5taff will garner other city's Yl0 job ctescriptions wn[I stall from there.
lU S 11. Business Fricndlv, Customer Senjcc - Cih' Manager Mercicr said that in each of our
transactions, tliere are multiple custOmers to c;onsiclei•; and there is a neecf Co de.fiiie who the customer is: is
it the person complallllllg, t:he public in general; the person being complained about; the councilmember?
He explained that we need to think tibout: balancina the multiple interests in all issues involved in each
aspect of what we do, ancl asked if the desire is to make the customer happy, and if nat, tvhat is the
ullirnate desire; and in tlefining that, perhaps we should define thc corporate philosophy. DiSCUSSion
ensLied regarding cuseomex satisfaction <<ersus happy customers; defning the process; understandina the
eqnclusion to any process and nnt changing the process mid-stream. Mr. Mercier stated that satisfaction
is a function of expcctaiion; and brought to everyone's att.ention the "Customer Care ] O1" handout. Idetis
Nteoing of 02-I Z-05 Page 4 of 5
Cc+uncil ApRrovcd:
Draft
of what: customer c.are is, and good customer serrice included usino the approach of not saying `'no"
imrnediately; handling issues wi[hin a cert<<in time Frarne; qualifying thc cust:omer's expectution on each
issue; confirmed undersLanding ofexpectation; no preferential h-eatment and always maintain integrity in
thc system; use of standards; correceing standartls wh(:r(; necessary; use of discretion without giving
preferential treatment; being coi7sistent and nor arhin•srY; identifying the "hottlenecks" aiid working to
eliminate t:liem; awillingness io fix a problern; and eliminatin„ giving customer the run-around. Mr.
Mercier explained that staff addresses each cornpllint and is in the nrocess of draft:ing a check list for s[aff
and customer. Depu[y City lvianaaer ReDor added that staff is also working on a mapping process to chart
all aspects of issues and to better identiFy those are<is which become bottlenecked, and t:hen work on
fixing the prohlem.
12. Legislative lssucs - City A~tanagcr Mercier stt~ie.d chat this issue is in anticipation of Councilmembers
attending the AWC cnnference in Olyrnpia next week. .After discussion of several potential issues: it was
determincd t.hat the three main issues to address woulci be (1) wascewater treatment issues; (2) pension
contribution rates and whether phasing would be passible; and (3) streamlined sales tax.
7'he meeting adjournecl at: 3:10 p.m.
Diana Wilhite; Mayor
ATTrST:
l
,
~
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
i ' .
.
,Meeting of 02-12-05 Page 5 of5
Council Approved:
Draf!
.
, . INM u'res
C1TY UF SPOI{~4NEVAI.:LTY
STiTDY S1?SSION
I'uesduy, Fcbruar3,15, 2005, 6:00 p.m.
Attendancc:
Couneilmembcrs: Staff:
Diana Wilhite, Mayour iMike Jaclcson, Aarks & Recreation (7irector
Rich Munson, DepuCy Mayor Cary Urisl:ell, Deputy City Attorney
Mike 17eVleming, Councilmember Ken Thomp5oti, Finanee .Director
Mikc Flanigan, Cauncilmember Marina Sukup, Community Iaevelonment Director
Steve Ta_ylor, Councilrricmber 1"om Scholtens, }3uilding Official
Gary Schimmels, Councilmembel• Cal 1Nalker, Police Chief
John 1-lohman, Senior rngincer
Morgam Koudelka, Administrative Analyst
y Clerk
Absent: Dick Deneany, Cnu►rrilmember Cliris Biiinbridge, Cit~
Mayor Wilhite called che meeting lo orcier at 6:00 p.m., welcomcd all in attendance, and exrlained
that this is a study session and excepc far the tirst hvo a°enda items, there would be no public
comment.
It was mnved by Depqv Mrqnr Miutsnn, secoirded hy Cnlutcilmemher TYunigan, rrrid utinninrously
agreed uporT tu r.zcirse Cou►icilntember I)enerenv f'runr tonigh!'s »reetifrb.
~I. Motion Gonsideration: ,Authorize the Citv Manager to Nletaeiaee Building Space - Nina Repor
J Il tivas moved by Mayor Ti%illaite trird seconded by Deputy Mayor Minrsori to acrtlroriae the Ciry jWanager or
desrgrree to negotiate hurlding space. Finance Iairector Thompson, speal(ing far absent I7eputy Ciry
Manager }teeor, explained that this item is beinc, brought before Council Conight in response to council
dircction frotn last Saturclny conccrning the Ciry's current building lease and needed additional space, and
stated that staff' has contacted the building managcr to alert them that we want to discuss lease issues. Tt
was also mentioned that lease extensions or additional lease of space would come before Council later for
final approval. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. I3rief discussion
ensued eonccrning reserving ehe sec;ond floor conference room, aiid possible future neecl Cor inc;reased
vehicle space and increased storage space. Vote h)+ Acclumation: h7 Fuvor: Urranilirous. Opposed: None.
Abstentions: Alofre. AIotion carried.
2. ,V9otinn Consideration: PineslUlansfield Miti~ation Aereements - John Hohman
a. It tivas nrovEd by Depirty Mrrvvr 14unsorl and secnrrded by A9ayor Wilhite thut Cvwicil ac.cept the
"Miligation Agreen-ierl(, SR ?i (Pirtes Rond) rt9urrsfield .Roud Constructiarz Project " benveen the C_ity uirtl
J. Grunt Persott, dutecl Feb►•:rury 8, 2005, 1)1 /T7P. Q/l101U11 Of S5,159. OQ, UIICI ClilII70!"lZG IFIB Clly MQT1Qg81' j0
execcrte sard agreenaerrl.
Senior Engineer Holiman briefly explained that this issue is a continuation of the February 15, 2005
motion considei-aiion, wlierein a motion was passed that the City increase its participation in the
"Mitigaiion Agreemcnt, SR. 27 (Pines Roac{) Manslield Road Construction Prqject" by up co $53,196,
which may be reduced sl►ould Thomas Hamilton andlor J. Grant I'ersQn file with the Ciry Clerk, their
eespective mitigation agreements by 4:30 p.m. Fritlay, February 11, 2005, the final subttlittal opportuniry
for their participation in said mitigation anrecmeut; aclding lhat all three of the agreements on tonight's
~ agenda were i-eceived within the stipulated timeframe. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no
" comments were offered. Vote by Acclumulion: In Fa>>or: Uirarrinaous. QpJlosecl: None. Absterifions:
Norre. Motiorr carried.
SWCI}' SeSSicm \•tinutes of 02-114)5 Pnge ! of 4
Approved bv Cuuncil:
prafl
b. It was rnuveci Gy Deputy MU))OY ML!lTSUI7 crnd secoirded by Cow7c.ilmember Flcrnigail that Cauneil
accert the "Mitigaiiorr Agreement, SR 27 (1'irres Roud) A9ansfieltl Rorid Cortstruction Pruject" betweeir
the Ciry, rnrd Tlronras Hamillon, dated Febrarury 10, 2005 in the unroarnt of $SJ, 47S, 00, and crutltorize the
City Marruger to exectdc srrid agreement. Ma>>or Wil6rite irrvited public comme»t; no commenls were
ujfered Vote b), Acclunlatiori: In Favnr: Uitunimous. Upposed: A'vne. Ahsterrtiorrs: Na7e. Motion
carriecl. .
c. It was moved by Depriry Minior Munsar arrd secu►icled by Coanzcibrrenrber Tlanigar? that Cu:uneil
accept the "Aqitigation Agreemerlt, SR 27 (Pines Roud) Masisfielcl Road Constrcrction Praject " het►veen
the City und 'l6aonas Ilamilton, dated Fehruurv 10, 2005 in the uritoarrrt of $28, 525.00, und cruthnrize the
City Manager to execuie saicl crgreement. Ma}~cir Wil6iite invited public conament; nn comments ►vere
off~red. Vote by Acclunurtiprl: In FCI1+01': UIJp)11771p1lS. OjJJ7052CI: IVOIIE. AI).SIL')1P1017S: RlOI7C. MO11017
CLfYY1ECI.
ltegular Study Session Ystues (No Public Comrnent):
3. Spokane Housing, Authnrit:v Presentation - Dianne_ Quast, William Zeck
Spokane I-lousing Authoriry Chair William 7cck and Executive Uirector Taianne Qua.st briefed Gounei] on
the `'`~1orlheast VVashington Housing Salutions 2004 Annual Repqr[ to the Community," and stated that
this is their 32id _year of servicc to this communiey <is they cantinue to worlc to mtilce a dif.ference in over
5,000 households throughout the fve eounties they serve; and staced also that due to financial constraints,
they are- serving 200 fetirer familics from just eigllteen months ago; that they saw these changcs coming so
they went about tivorkine to modify dieir strategic plan; and that they are now doing business as the
"Northeast WashinLKOn Housing Solutions." After reviewing the annual report, yls. Quast and Mr. Zeck
also briefec! Cou»cil on other curnent activities, stich as ncighborhood revitalization specifically in tlle
Edgecliffcommunity through the Weed anc1 Seed program. They entled by asking for Council's support '
over the next c.yc.le of federal f'unds as the President's budget tias cut into the CDBG funcis and tnoved
those funds to the Uepariment of Commerce, that Ihey will continue to see a slow dawnward spiral of the
number of homcs they can actually serve; and that they Nvill necd assistance, and advocacy to the
legislators.
4. 7'ax. Tncrement Financini - .Tn Eliasseii atid E7obin Totli (ED., and Tom 12eese lCity of Spokanel
Mr. Reese explained tax increment financing via his PowerPoint presentation; and brought council
attentian to the draft write-up from the Spokane A.rea Economie Developrnent Council addressing cax
inerement: financing. Conccrning those except'ions to using the TIF proce3s, Mr. Keese staied he would
check to see if libraty districls fall into. that category, and will let Council knqw the answer to that
question. Additionally, Depury City Attorney Driskell stated he will examine the LID process in relation
to 'C'IFs.
5. Cab1e rranchise Update - Morgan I<oudelka
Administrative AnalysY Koudelka explained that the purpose of this presenlacion is to update Council on
the franchise renevval proccss, and added chat Mr. AI Gilson, a Spolcane Valley representative on the
Spokane Iteginnal Cablc Advisory Boarcl is also in attendanee and will give a presentation on the
activities of tlie I3oard. Mr. KoudelkA stated tlhe history and the renewal process as shown in his
PowerPoint presentation, ineludinn the need for a etistomer survey, focus groups; and a public hearing
sometime this summer; tinct sflid that staf'f seeks clircction in rivo areas: moving forward with the re-
franchise process as otrtlinecl, and direction as to the ext.ent of'the use of the Cable Advisory Boarcl, andlor
consideration of creatin~ a temporary ad hoc committee U5lI1~, the three bc~ard mcmbcrs, any
councilmember, or other committEe structure. ]t was Council consensus to instruc.t staff to move forward with the process as Outlined.
Study tiession N-1irnutes of 02-I 5-0j Pdhe 2 pf 4
Appmved b}• Cnunc:il'.
Drafl
Mr. AI Gilson eaplained that his groiip mee[s eveiy fourth Tuesday at Spokane Cit:y Hall, and that the
board is an advisory board and they Would be pleased ta ofi'er cOuncil with quarterly or semi-annual
updates on their funetions. Mayor Wilhite stated she would like an ad hoc commit[ce formed and have
the advisoiy council as part of that cornmit:t:ee; that die Council would like to see proposed c.able survey
questions prior to dissemination, and would like thE. Cable ,qclvisory BUard to repnrt back to council at:
least yuarierly, ar when relevant issues occur.
6. Update. 2005 Contracts wi[h Spokane Counh~ - Moraan Koudelka
Administrative Analyst KoudelF:a explainecl that Spokane Valley Iias ffieen service agreements with
Spokane County; and ChaG many of t:he city services are performed by the County based on approvGCl
interlocal agreements; most of whieli eapired at the encl of 2004, but the City and County have agreed to
extend the conn•acts under existing terms pending finaliz.ation of the revised eontract provisions. lqe
stated that the City and the County have worked to develop a rnodel agreement to use in the renewa1 of
ihese abreements far the year 2005. Mr. Koudellca went through his Pow•erl'oint presentation and
explauned that no aclion is ilecessary at this point.
Councilmember Flanigan stated that he would like to see some tiaUu•es in terms of what our eitiz.ens get
from the county far Che taxes paicl, as there is a percepCinn that we are being double-billed for ssrvices.
Mr. Koudelka stated that he can define what «<e pay in the contracts; but he is wlcertain if anyronc has a
f'trm grasp on a breal:cfown of the regional costs. lt was suggested this topic might be one to address with
the Count), a[ ne~# iveek's joint meeting.
Nlayor Wilhite called for a sliort rrcess at 7:45 p.m., and reconvened the meeting at 7:52 p.m.
~ 7. Proposed Storniwater Ordinance -.lohn E-Iqhman
Engineer 1-[ohman gave the background of this issue per his accompanying PowerPpint presentation, and
statecl that scaff seeks direetion on moving fanward to a Ii.rst reaclinb. Diseussion followed concerning the
intent of the project being for new developinent; and that an irrigation sYStem could simply be a sprin.kler
connectcct to a hose (that Mr. Hohman ean modif), t.hac ]anguage in the ordinance); and that it is the
responsibility ofihe homcowne.r to maintain t:he area ancl not. council's role lo direct how specifically that
sliould be done. ln response to M_r. Schimmel's question, Mr. I-Iohman ssid for the nex.c presenlat.ion, that
he will highlighc changes from what Lvas phased in from last year, and that the mowing, irrigating
language can alsa be modified so it will be consistent throughout the docuinent.. In adclition, itilr. Hohman
will clarify dhat pate f ve slates "calendar" days. It was Council consensus to bring this inatter forward for
a first readirig.
8. Hazard MitiEation ]'lan- Marina Sukup
Communiiy Development Dieector Sukup gAVe a PowerPoini nresenlation on the need for a hazard
mitigation plan, antl Nvha1 tMat plan merins; afterwards it -was Coimcil consensus to move fnrward as
necessarv. " •
9 1'roposeci Streei Vacation Ordinance Amendment - Marina Sul:up
Community Developrnent fairectqr Sukup yvent over the sugge.stecl amen<{ments as shown on her Etequest
for Council Action form; after xvhich Courncil gave consensus to move farwarcl with a fist reading.
10. tirater Safe r Ite¢ulations - Caiv L7risl:ell
Deput_y Cit-Y Attorne_y Driskell eaplained the baclcground of tlle previously adopted watEr safety
regulations ancl tliiit staff recommends classifying the penalty as a class three civil infraction. It was
Council consensus to move forward as recommended.
StudyScssic,n Adinutcsof 02-I S•05 Paee 3 of 4
Approved by Council:
Draft
1 1 Advance Agenda Aclditions - Mayor Wilhite
`I"herc were no new proposeCl additionS 1:0 the advance agenda.
12. Couneil Checlc in - Mike Jackso►1
M3yor Wilhite thanked Parks and 12ecreation Uirector Jacl:son for taking over for Ms. Regor due to
illiiess. L7eputy vlaynr Munson stressed the need foi• someone to attencl the 3:00 p.m. mceting tomorrow
it' Ms. Regor could not at3:cnd.
13. Deputv C:it ! ytanager Comments
Deputy Cit:y Attorney Driskell gave a brief update, on the UAA (Use Att;ainabiliry Analysis) advising that
therc has been ongoing discussion betwecn local jurisdictions and the DOE; that bf t:hc previously sigmed
pe[ition rcquesting rule making b~~ .TaOE; tl~at there are now negotiations an what, if any, jurisdictions
would wiChdraw that petition; and that dhis item is schedulecl for further consideration at the FebrualT 22
Council mee.ting, acldin~ that there is a time limitatic~n for ~vi[hdra~+~ing the petition of February 25, 2005.
Therc being no Further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
Diana Wilhite, Ivlayor
ATTr S'C:
Christine Bainbridge, CiCy Clerk
-
~ .~Stud}' Scssion htinutcs of OZ- I3-OS Fage 4 of 4
.Zppmvect by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~--'Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 02-22-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply; x consent ❑ old business newv business ❑ public hearing
❑ informa#ion ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislafion
AGENDA ITEM TITLE :
Payroll for Period Ending February 15, 2005
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Payroll for period ending 2-15-05 Salary: $ 94,772.26
Benefits: $ 10,061.94
$104,834.20
STAFF CONTACT: Daniel Cenis
ATTACHMENTS
J
~CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 2-22-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: x consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
El information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the. rollowing Vouchers:
BACKGROUND:
VOUCHER L1ST VOUCHER TOTAL
Dtn1'E INumbcr(s) VOUCHEK
Av1QUI~iT
02-04-05 6259-6293 less626862.581.96
02- I I -OS 6294-6326 398,330.64
GRAhiD TOTAI. 460,912.60
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
Approve claims for vouchers:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Mary Baslington
ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists
,
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
02f0412005 3:12:25PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Venclor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
6259 21312005 000714 MAILSTREAM 02l03104 Barker Rcl. POSTAGE/MAILING NOTICES 1,372,96
Total : 1,372.96
6260 2I412005 000713 ALSC ARCHITECTS 02101105 Refund ALSC REFUND OF OVERPAYMENT 25.00
Tota) : 25.00
6261 2/4/2005 000335 ALTON'S TIRE 6-3357 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 23,77
6-3358 VFI-IICLE MAItdTEN/1P1CE 23_77
Total : 47.54
6262 2/4l2005 000037 AfWERICAN LIPIEN 582357 FLOOR h4A7 SERVICE 45_82
Tota) : 45.82
6263 214l2005 000030 AVI5TA UTILITIES 490085074 . LIGHTING POWER CHARGES 65.28
Total : 65.28
6264 2I4/2005 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 27604 COFFEE SUPPLIES 97.35
Total : 97.35
6265 2/4/2005 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 870186725501 VEHICLE FUEL 588.18
Total : 588.18
6256 214/2005 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DIST, #19 05859.0 WATER CHARCES 37.50
Total : 37.50
6267 2I4I2005 000686 DEPARTMEM' OF 1_ICENSING 2I4/05 DOL CASH CASH TRANSMI'fTAL TQ DOI. 130.50
Total : 130.50
G268' 4~ 2/4/2005 000002 W & H BUSINESS SYSTEMS 128532 COST PER COPY CMARGES 306.43
128752 COST 1'EF2 COPY CHARCES 33.32
128752 COST PER COPY CHAl7GES 94.02
128845 COST PER COPY CHARGES 91.16
128846 COST PER CQf'Y CHARGES 38.35
128847 COST PER COPY CWARGES 60.40
128848 COST PER CUPY CMARGCS 14_34
Total : 638.02
E'aqe* 'i
vchlist Voucher List Page: 2
02/0412005 3:12:25PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apb8t1k
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #t DescripUon/Account Amount
6269 2/4l2005 000716 HELM, JASON 02104l05 Refuncl FtEFUND MECHANICAL PERMIT 8.00
Total : 8.00
6270 2l4/2005 000712 HOSPITALI7Y CAI2kERS QNLINE INC 49017 ADVERTISING 325A0
Total : 325.00
6271 2/412005 000715 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 7003-7311-DOU4-9347 EMPLOYEE APPRCCIATION 14.99
Total : 14.99
6272 2!4l2005 000022 INLAND BUSINESS PRODUCTS, INC. 52367 CIlY ID BADGE 19.53
Total : 19.53
6273 2/412005 000070 INLAND POWER AND LIGW7 CO 01/27l05 IP&L STREET POWER & LIGNTING 406.06
Total : 406.06
6274 2l412005 000117 JOURNAL NEWS PUBUSFiINC 25651 ADVERTISING 30.75
25652 ADVERTISING 63.75
25653 ADVERTISING 108.75
28887 ADVERTISING 30.00
28888 ADVERTISING 30.00
28889 ADVERTISING 30.00
28894 ADVERTISING 30.00
28995 ADVERTISING 30.00
28999 ADVERTISING 35.00
29124 ADVERTISING 35.00
29352 ADVE RTI SI N G 35.00
29353 ADVERTISING 35.00
Total : 493.25
6275 2/412005 000033 MCPC ' 4672054 40414 OFFICE SUPPLIES 233.32
7otal : 233.32
6276 21412005 000258 MIC(20FLEX INC. 00015478 7AX AUDIT PROGRAM 21224
00015481 TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE REN'i'AL 559.23
Total : 771.47
6277 2/4/2005 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY 01/27l05 Modem Elec sTREEi' LIGMTING POWERIWATEF 6,908.46
Pang: 2
. ,
vchlist Voucher List Pagc: 3
02f0412005 3:12:25PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO ti DescriptionlAccount Amount
6277 2J4/2005 000132 000132 MOCJERN ELECTRIC WATER COMP, (Continued) 7otal : 6,908.46
6278 2/4l2005 000243 NORTHWEST SIGN SUPPLY 716317 40416 PLOTfER F'AF'ER 134.14
Total : 134.14
6279 2/4120U5 400652 OFFICE DEF'OT 271527885-001 40398 OFFICC- SUPPLIF_S 37_61
27179134515-001 40402 KITCMEN SUP!'LIES 156.78
272277776-001 40404 OFFICE SUPPLIES 18_73
273160374-001 40410 OFFICE SUF'PLIGS 438,74
Total : 651.86
6280 214/2005 000024 RESOIJRCG GC)Mf'U71NG INC. 36597 IT SUPPOR'I' 2,251.38
Total : 2,251.38
6261 21412005 000415 ROSAUERS U-CITY 481213 MEETING SUPPLIES 36_52
Total : 36.52
6282 2/412005 000003 ROYAI_ BUSINESS SYSTEMS 94281A 1 MAINT. COS7 PER COPY CHARGE: 557.81
Total : 557.61
6283 214/2005 000709 SENSKE IAWN & TREE CARE 1246559 A40NTHLY CONTRACT PAYMEN'I" 43,276.46
7otal : 43,276.46
G284 2141'1005 000710 SPQKi1NF_ COUNTY (3AR ASSOCIATION 1/28/05 Bar Assoc_ ADVERTISiNG 100_00
Total: 100.00
6285 Zl4f?.005 000658 SPOKANE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Q1f"7105 Jurar fees JUFtOR CHARGES 376_02
01128105 Juror Fees JUROR CHnRGES 276_64
Total : 652.66
6286 21412005 00032$ SPbKANE VALLEY 5ENIOR, CI7IZENS A 01128105 SVSC Rei+nb. REIMD. SPOKANE VALLEY SENIOR 37.99
Total : 37.99
6287 2/4/2005 000093 TME SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 2916468 1125/05 NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTiON 161_00
Total : 161.00
6288 2/412005 000167 VERA WATER & WOWER 12/28 - 02f01 - Vera STf7EET POWkR I_IGHTING/WATEF 1,826.95
Total : 1,826.95
Page: 3
~
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
02104/2005 3:12:25PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
6289 2I4/2005 000460 W.S.A.S.C., C10 KATHYARMSTRONG WSASC f2enewal MEMBERSHIPS 30.00
Total : 30.00
6190 2I4J2005 (]00038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 1378199-2681-4 WASTE DISPOSAL SERVICE 191.84
Total : 191.94
6291 214l2005 000021 WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, 1711VENPORT. 78041 LEGAL SEF2VICES 70.00
Total : 70.00
6292 2/4/2005 000711 WMCA WMCA Chris Bain. REGISTRATION 375.00
7otal : 375.00
34 Vouchcrs for bank code : apbank Bank total : 62,581.96
34 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 62,561.96
I, lhe undersigned, do certify under penalty of pequry,
that the materials have been furnished, ihe services
rendered, or the labor performed as dvscribed herein
and ihat the claim is just, due and an unpaid obJigaiion
agairist tNe c:ity ot Spokane valley, and that I am
aulhorized to authenticate and cerlify to said daim.
Finanee Director Date
PanP• 4
~
vchlist Voucher List Page: 1
0211112005 2:26:07PM Spokane Valley
' Baryk code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Arnnunt
6294 2111/2005 000335 AI.TON'S TIRE 6-2441 VEHICLE Ml11NTF_NANCE 23.75
Total ~ 23.75
6295 2/11/2005 000168 B 8 C TELEPi•IONE INC. 88334 TELEPF•iONE SYSTEM f7EPAll2 R. LJ; 11i.76
Total : 111.76
6296 2/11l2005 000606 COLUMBIA FIBER SOLUTIONS 3856 C1ARK FIBER LEASE 32.55
Total : 32.55
6297 2/1112005 000136 DEPARTMENT OF INFO SERVICES, STA' 2005010226 COMPUTER SERVICES & SMALL 7c 631,39
4G407
Total : 631.39
6298 2/11/2005 000686 DEPARTMENT OF UCENSING 2/10105 DOL CASH CAShi TRANSMITTnI_ TO CIOL i61.50
Total : 161.50
6299 211112005 000171 GEIGER CORRECTIONS CENTER 01l2005 Geiger Corr. GEIGER PRnGRAMS FOR 1/05 6,337.72
Total : 6,337.72
6300 2111l2005 000410 GRIFFIN PUBLISHING INC_ 05288 - S[NIOR CENTER AlEWSLETfF_RS 340.69
1'otal : 340.69
6301 2/11/2005 000002 H 8 H BUSIPIESS SYSTEMS . 129106 COST PER COPY CIIARGES 42.10
Total : 42.10
6302 2/11f7.OD5 004434 HUSFLOEN, BARRY 02l07I05 BH Reirr7b. MISCELLANEOUS REIMBURSEMEIN 4.$7
Total : 4.87
6303 2/1112005 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST. #G 112500.0 2/1/05 WA"I'ER CI-IARGES 165.00
Total : 165.00
53[)4 2l1112005 000117 JOURtdAL NEWS PUCiUSMING 25695 AUVERTISItJG 33.00
25696 ADVERTISING 56.25
• 25697 A[7VER7151NG G6.00
25698 ADVERTISING 65.25
25E99 ADVER'1'151NG 67.50
25700 ADVERTISING 86.75
Paye: 1
vchlist Voucher Llst Page: 2
02111/2005 2:26:07PM Spokane Valley
Bankcode: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Uivoice PO ig Description/Account Amount
6304 2/1112005 000117 JOURNAI. NEWS f'UBLISHING (Continued)
25701 ADVERTISING 67.50
25702 ADVERTISING 113.25
25703 ADVEI2TISING 120.00
Total : 655.50
6305 ' 2/11f2005 000183 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS March 2005 Rent MARCFI 2005 RENT 24,731.95
Total : 24,731.95
6306 2/11l2005 000552 OrFICE DEPOT 273967213-001 FORMS 10.07
2741222985-001 40415 OF1=1CF_ SUPPLIES 26J5
274122366-001 40415 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51.00
274891896-001 40418 OFFICE SU!'I'LIES 170.92
Tota I : 258.74
8307 2111/2005 000307 OFFICE OF THE STATE 7REASURER 1131105 State S7A7E REIMITfANCES 57,399_59
Tota I : 57, 399.59
6308 2/11/2005 000119 PIP PRINTING . 13330029239 40411 OFFICE SUPPLIES 206.10
Total: 206.10
6309 2/11/2005 000024 RESOURCE COMPUTING INC. 36598 IT SUPPORT - CENTERPI.ACE 1,736.00
Total : 1,736.00
6310 2111/2005 000341 RICpM CpRPOi:nT10N 05036684217 COPIFR RENTAL PAYMENT 246.30
05036684675 COPIrR REN'i"I\L PAYMENT 4 12.30
05036705257 COPIER RENTAL PAYMENT 238.70
Total : 897.30
6311 2111/20a5 000415 ROSAUERS U-CITY 485493 f1AEL=TING SUF'PI_IES 12.99
Total : 12.99
6312 2/11/2005 000397 SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP 84345004 FIRE SPRINKLER SECtVICE CONTR 195.30
Total : 195.30
6313 2/1112005 000718 SIR SPEEDY 54175 PRIN'fING & BINDING 1,138.81
Total : 1,135.81
2
vchlist Voucher List Page: 3
02J1112005 2:26:07PM Spokane Valley
Bankcode: apbank
Voucher Date Vendor (nvoice PO # QescriptionlAccount Amount
6314 2/11/2005 000230 5POKANE CNTY AU17170F2S OFC, RECO 02104l05 Rec FePS COUNTY RECORDING FEES 134.00
Total : 134.00
6315 2/1112005 000172 SPOKANF_ CaUHTY ENGINEER 05-40 COUNIY ENGINEERING SF-FtVICF_E 45,882.45
05-41 COUNTY ENCyINEEi21NG SEF2VICF_d 234,184.06
Total : 280,066.51
6316 2111I2005 000308 SPOKANE COUN'IY I'R05ECU'1'ING, A'i'1 1105 !'ras. Attomey Cf21ME VICTIMS COMPENSATION F 86321
Total : 663.21
6317 2111l2005 000658 SPOKANE COUNTY SUPERIOR COUR7 02/04105 Jtiror Fees JUROR CHARGES 280.41
Totai : 290.41
6318 2/1112005 000323 SPOKANE COUNTY UTIUTIES 2I1105 Ulilities SEWER CHl1RGES 681.49
Total : 681.49
6319 2/1112005 000081 STATE OF WA, DEPART OF REVENUE 602 251 431 6 1105 COivIBINED EXCISF TAX FiE7URN 138.13
Total : 138.13
6320 2/11/2005 000398 TAN MOOF7C ARCWITECTS P3983 #14 MIRABEAU POIN7 CENTERPLAGF_ I 11,625_11
Total : 11,625.11
6321 2/1112005 000093 THE SP0ICESMAN-REVIEW 42365 AL7VER't"ISING 1,904.70
Total : 1,904.70
6322 2111/2005 000717 7hIE TRANSPO GROUP, INC. 6919 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.00
Total : 5,000.00
6323 2111/2005 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGEN1'S, 401A PL 02/08I05 ICMA SWORTAGE ON ICMA ACCOUNT 216.50
Total : 216.50
6324 2/1112005 000167 VERA WATER & I'OWER 2/1 - 21'9/05 VNRA 5TREFT POWER UCHTING/ WA7E1 5D8.70
Total : 508.70
6325 2111/2005 000100 WA(30 5896 40422 PUBLICATIONS 409.75
. 40422
Total : 409.75
. Paye: 3
vchlist VouCher List Page: 4
02/1112005 2:26:07PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount lAmaunt
6326 2111l2005 000089 XO COMMUNICATIONS 0104704146 TELEPHONE/DSL SERVICE 1,408.52
Total : 1,408.52
33 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 398,330.64
33 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 398,330.64
1, the undersigned, do csrlity under penally af pery'ury,
thal the materials have heen furnisHed, the services
rendereci, ar the labor pertormcd as descrtbed herein
and that the ciaim is ji,iet, due and an unpaid obllyatlon
against the City of Spokane Valley, and that I am
authorized to authenticale and certi(y lo safd claim.
~ Finance Director bate
~a,one• d
' . ~ .
CITY OF S}' O KANE VALLE Y
Reyuest for Council Action
iMcetin~ Date: 02-22-05 City Manaser Sign-off:
AGEnTllA 1TEM TTTL.I; : Motinn Considcration: Appuintment Recommendations
PTaVTOUS COU\°CII., AC'170\T 7'AKLN: Per Council direction, vacancy availability was
annquneed to the general public via several notices in Valley News Herald, a notice in the Spokesman
Review, and noticc on our website. Also per Council direction, incumbents were notifecl that the
vacancies would be annouriced and they Wrould be encouraged to apply. Viayor VVilhite proposes the
appointments as noted below.
The Lodging `I`ax Advisory Commitlee appointment was tablecl at the February R, 2005 Council nieeting.
a. Lodging Tax Ach+isorv Commictee - Councilmcmber Flanigan
The committee makeup consists of two people authorized to collect the tax (hoteliers); and nvo people
who are qualified to receive the funds. The current committee rttember hotelier .leff Fiman's term does
not expire until 12-31-05. "I'here are currently three vacancies. Vaeancies include onc from those
required to collcct the ta.v and ttivo fi•om thosc yualified to receive the funds. The tcrms are to be for
one or hvo ycars.
i ~
,
,
RECOMME``llLD ACTIQiN OR MOTlONS:
1. Motion to rcrnove the matter from thc table.
2. AloFioia tn corrfirm MuyGral appoinhment of .1 i: 13eck to the Lorlging Tcrx Advisory Conzmittee for a
term of 1►vo years.
3. Mntron to cotrfrrnr Muvarnl appnintments of Peggy Doerittg um1.I,isa Bracco to rhe Lodgirrg Twr
Advisnry Conurrittee fUr a l.erin of orre >>ear(s) tnztl two _years re.sPectively.
1 '
- , CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 2-22-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business X new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending IegislaEion
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Ordinance Declaring Intent to Annex the City of Spokane
Valley into Spokane County Library District.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 27.12
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Staff presentation on February 8, 2005 at study
session.
BACKGROUND: In 2004, the City analyzed various library servics providers to determine
whether the City should contract for those senrices, or provide them in-house. A significant
number of citizens advised the City Council that their preference would be to annex to Spokane
County Library Distric#.
The Council has instructed staff to draft an ordinance that would result in this issue being put
before the City's electors on May 17, 2005
OPTIONS: Do nothing; instruct stafr to provide more information; ask for revisions; advance it to
a second reading.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move that we advance the Proposed Ordinance
Qeclaring Intent to Annex the City of Spokane Valley into Spokane County Library District to a
second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The potential financial impacts are substantial, as discussed
with the Council on February 8, 2005.
STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager; Morgan Koudelka, Administrative
Analyst.
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed draft ordinance.
,
Draft
CITY QF SYOKAiYC VALLFwY
SPOKANE COUNTY, VVASHLI'GTQ\`
O1tL)INANCE NQ. QS-
A\T OItU111zA.NCE (Ji+ THE CITY UF SPOKAt\iE VALL,EY, SPOKAlT COUNTY
WASIiINGTOV DECLARTNG TMF INTENT TO ANNEa THE CITY QF SPOKANE
VAL[..FY L1TT0 THE SPQKA\`F COUNTY LII3RARY nISTRICT, AND SUBVIITTING
TO THE QUALIT[ED F:LECTOTtS OF TMF CiTY AT AN ELECTION MAY 17,2005,
A l'12OPOSITIQN AUT11012ILiNC TrIT ANNEXATION C.)T' TAE CITY LNTU 7`RT
SI'()tiAN-E COUN'r Y L1BEtARY nTSTRICT; ANll LSTABLTSEIING Av cFrEC'rIVF
naTE.
WHFR.EAS, the Cih, of Spokane Vallcy has the authority under RCW 27.12.360 to initiatc by
ordinance the inclusion nf the City into the Spokane County Library C)istrict ("the SCLD"); and
W~HEREAS; the Cit), desires thac the City join the SCLD and has directed the preparation of this
Ordinance dec.lari►ia its intent co annex into the $CI.,D; anct
VIIHERE.AS, in accordance with RCRr 27.12.360, the City has notifed the state librariiin of this
Ordinance; and
Wf-IERE,4S, pursuant t:o an a*reement signed hy the. Cily and SCLD on Iaecernber 10, 2004; the
SCLll Board of Trustees concur with the intent to annex the Ciry inlo the SCLD; and
r~ WI-[LREAS, in aeedrelanee with RCW 27.12, the Ciry Council desires to place a proposition
" before tlie voters of the City to autliorize such anneaation, and desires to request that Spokane County
take aII necessary steps to do so in timc for said proposition to be placed an the May 17, 2005 ballot; and
WHEREM, upon annexation, the City Woultl become part of the SCLD; the real propcrty within
the City would be subject to taxation by the SCLD; and the Ciry could terminate itq current operations
contract with the SCLD effectivc T)ccember 31, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the Cit_y Council finds fnr all those reasons that the public interest will be served
tliereby.
NOW TI-TLRLFORE, the City Council for the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washington, oedains as follows:
Section 1. The City Council hereby declares its intent to annex into the Spokanc County
Library District, a»d finds that the public interest will be served thereby.
Section 2. 1'he C:it), Council .finds that the State I..ibrarian was notified of this proposed
annexal.ion on February 10; 2005, and ihat die Board of Trustees for the Spokanc County L.ibrary Distriet
coneurs with the annesation of the City int4 the :Spokane County Library District, all pursuant to ]7CW
27.12.360.
Section 3. The Spokane County Board of Commissioners is requested to authorizc by
resolution the Spokane Couttty Audicor to cal) and conduct an election to be held in the City in the
manner provided by I~~w on A1ay 17, 2005, in conj~inction ~;~ith any other matter that m~iy be schedulcct
Orttinance OS-_: annrxation to SCldD Nge I uf 2
Draft
Cor ballot nn that date, for the purpose of submitting to the qualified electors a1'the City by mail-in ballot
for their approval or rejection, a proposition in substantially the following form:
ShaU die city of Spokane Valley bc annexed to and
be a part of the Spokane County Library District'?
YES r -
No r
lf approved, the anneaation would become effective January 1, 2006.
Scction 4. The City Clerk is Iiereby authorized and directed to promptly furnish to ttle
Board of Commissioners f'or Spokane Counly and the Spokiine County Auditor a certified copy of this
Ordinance upon adoption.
Section 5. Severabilitv. If any section, subsection, sentenec or elause of this ordinance is
for any reason helci to hc invalid; such decision shall not affect the validiCy of the remainino provisions of
t.his ordinance.
Sectic,n 6. Effective Taate. This Ordinance shall becorne effcctive five days after
publication of this ordinance, or a summary thereAf, in the nfficial newspaper of the City.
Adopted this day of March, 2005.
Cicy of Spokane Valley
Mayror, Diana Wilhite
A 1 TES'T:
Ciry Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Deputy City Attorney, Cary P. Driskell
Orclinance OS-_; anncxation to SCLll Page 2 of2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 22, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ald business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information El admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : PROPOSED STORMWATER REGULATIONS
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City Ordinance 03-431 Establishrnent of Storm Drainage &
Surface VVater Mgmt Uiility, City Ordinance 03-032 Adopfing by Reference, Spokane Co
Guidelines for S4ormwater Mgmt as Interim Guidelines
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council Meetings on January 20, 2004, February 24,
2004, August 24, 2004, and February 15, 2005.
BACKGROUND:
On January 20, 2004, we presented an overview of stormwater management within the City.
Existing stormwater management requirements were discussed.
On February 24, 2004 staff conducted the first reading of revised draft regulations for
stormwater management. Additional work was needed on the regulations. Staff initiated a
consultant study to review existing swale design regulations. Staff and the consultants
presented the findings of the study at the August 24: 2004 Council meeting. Staff revised the
regulations based upon the consultant's recommendations.
The SEPA review was completed in September 2004. CTED completed their review of the
proposed regulations in October 2004. A public hearing was held at the December 9, 2005
Planning Commission meeting. The Commission had several comments that have been
incorporated into the ordinance. The Commission reviewed the cnanges on January 13, 2005
and recommended adoption of the proposed regulations.
Staff presented an administrative report to Council on February 15, 2005. Several changes to
the ordinance have been made in response to Council Comments. Staff will highlight the
changes in this presentation. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council allows proposed regulations to proceed to
second reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohrnan, P.E.
~
J ATTACHMENTS Draff Ordinance - Stormwater 9.08
nuAFT
C[T1' QF SPQK,ANF, VAT,T FY
C s
J SYOKA\°L C(1UNT1', ~1'AS13I~~fGTON
OIZDTl`!llVCE iNQ. 01_
AN QRDINANCT QT TTIF CTTI' OF SF'OIhANE VALl,EY, V1'ASHINGTQN
LSTABL15HlNC SLC'1'lUN 10.09.08 STQRiVf`VATER MANAGEML+'NT
RFGUT.,ATIONS OF TTTF SPOK.4NE NTALLE1' Ulvll~"OItAH DLVELUFMENT CQDF,
RF.PEALTNG RFGIII..ATInNS 1N C01'FLICT, PRON'InING FOFL SEVE1ZA13li.ll'Y
ANll LFhL+"C'1'1VL UATE.
N~!FTF:REAS. che purpuse of this ordinance is co provide iwthoritfor stormwater nevie~
clcveloprnenc and cont:ml wii:h respecr t:o the use of land, Ihe constMetion tind maintenance of stormwater
facilitie5 on public and privat:e proaaertv. the unlaw1"ial discharge of pollutants into a storm«<ater iacilitY,
and other matiers uroperi3-- related diereto;
R'HTRFAS, Conare_ss eriacted the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) to protect public health by
regulating the nation's drinking water suppl_y. The Act authorized the Environinental Protection Agcncy
~(EPA) to protect surface and groundwatcr supplies_:
WIiFRT•.AS, under the SDWA, rPA detennined that the Spokanc Valley-Rathdrum Prairie
Aquifer was the sole or principal source of drinlcing water in this region (Sole Source Aquifer or SSA).
This determination meant that no federal financial assistance may be used in this region tor any project
which EPA clctermines may contaminate t:he aquiCer resulting in sigmifcrint hazards to public health or the
cnviroiimenti-
r ,
'%VHE}2EAS, die SDWA itIso established the Underground Injection Control (UIC) Proginm to
provide safeguards for underground SpurciS Of drinking watcr. FPA delegatecl UTC authority to the
~ Washington Department of Ecologv (Ecology);.-
VVf•IFRFAS, EPA atid Fcolog)f Iiave (tetermined that public ancf private construction prajects
must meet groundwater protection stanciards and have recognized the Spokane County Guidclines for
~ Stonnwater 10anagement as such standards;.-
WWFRFAS, t:hrough Orciinanee \ro.03-32 the Ciry of Spokane Valley adopted the Spokane
Cotinty Guiciclines far SCOnt~%va[Cr ►vlanagement fis .imencled, as the interim desiSn guideiines for
stormwater management within the City of Spokane Valle.y;
WHEREAS_ in order to provide for the continued minagement and control of stormwater within
the City it is necessar), to devel4p regulatiUnS that relat:e to the e.onstTUCtinn and niaintenlnce of
~ stormwater facilities within the Cih; atd
. _ r sieFmwatei- .
tho
i'ht%{tEE.'-~1-049~FElLI~~tH-{~ETI~rw€trl-~ES~a~dc} ffHwaEerflaeilit5i,
, related eFece;
1'OV1' TH-FRFFORF, the Cit?, Co«ncil or the City o1' Spol:ane Valley, Washington tlo ordain as
, follows:
Section 1. Section 10.09.08 of ihe Spokane Vallcy Uniform Development Code is hereby
established to reacl as follows:
Siormwaier Ordiiiance 05-_ Page. 1 of R
DRAFT
"Section 10.09.08 Stormwate.r Management. Regulations
Sectiun 10.09.0$.01 I'inding and Nurposc. The increased (low of surface water from thc u5e and development of real property wit'hin the City must be managed to protect persnns, propcrty, and the
environmeili. Stormwater faciliiies are ac_ommon feature oF urban development which must be
constructed and maintained Lvhen property is developed or redeveloped within a geographic; arca. The
Ciry shall implement policies and procedures to:
(1) Vlinirnize the degratliition of water quality in surface and groundwater;
(2) Reduee tlie impact fi-om inercased surface water flow, erosion and sedimentation
caused by the developmeiit of propert_y;
(3) Promotc site planning and land development practic;es that are consistent with the
topographical and hydrolagical e4nditions; flI1CI
(4) Maintain and protect public and private property that is used and dedicated for
stomiwaler man3geme•nt.
Sectiou 10.09.08.02. Iaefinitions. The following definitions shall apply chrout*.hout this section:
A. "Best managemen[ praciices (BIvfi')" means currently available, feasible and generally
accepted techniques or practices lhat mitigate the adverse impact from the uncontrolled
stormwater on the environmenl, surrouncling propercies and infrascruet'ure.
B. "Ciey Propert.y" means real property ownetl by the City which may include easements,
dedications and rights-of-way.
C. "City Standards" mcans the "Spol:ane Counly Guiclelines for Stormwater
Vlanagement" and other standards developect or recognized by the i7irector that relate to • '
best management practices, chreshold requirements for a site drainage plan, exemptions, pcrmitting processes forms and such ocher matters for the administration of storniwater
control.
D. "Directar" means the Ciry 17irector of Public Works as authorized by the City
Manager.
E. "Erosion" means the disturbancc of land or teansportation of soil or other native
materials by running water, %vind, icc or other oeological agen[s.
-F. "Po11u1.ion Generatiug Impervious Surface. (PGiS)" means surfaces tllat are suGjecf to
vehicular use, indust:riat activiiies; or storage of erodible or leachable mzterials that
receive ciirect rainfall, or run-cm or hlqw-in -rainfalL Metal:roofs are PG1S unless c6ateci
~vith an inert, rio;u-leachatale_ material. RooCs chat: are subjeci to vcnting of commercial or
industrial,pollutants ,ire'also considered PG1S. r1 surTace, whelher piiVP.d Of flOf, sttall bc
considered PGI.S if it is regularly usec! by cnotor vehicles. The follawinj are considered
'regularly-usecl surfaces: roads, graveled andlor pavecl roatl shouldcrs, bike lanes wiXhin
the traveled liuie o.i' a roadway; driveways, parKing lots,.unfencec! fire lanes, vehiculax
stol-age yards; and TiiCpOrt rtanwa_ys.
C. "Site [arainage 1'lan" means a plan prepal•ed by a professional engineer licensed in the
State of VVashington that idcntifies the stormwater control area, scormwater facilities antl
othei• measures reasonably required b}1 the Direccor. "1'he pliin shiill contain analysis ancl
recommer►dations based upon the "Cit.y Standards".
!H "Standard Soils" nieans soils comprised of the \=atural Resouirces Conservalioii Disirict `
groups: Garrisou, Springdale, Cionner, and Hagen.
Stonnwater Ordinance OS-_ Page 2 of 8
T)RA.FT
~
"Stonmvater" means that portion of precipitation or snow melt ihat has nbt naturall),
percolated into the eround or oihenvise evaporated, but i5 cdntained, trlnsported or
flowina above grouiid throuah strcets, swales, channels, pipes, artificial or natural
surfitccs.
J. "Stormwater 1=ACility" means the draina,e system inclutting, but ndt limited to; drywell;
channel, inlet, curb drop, swale; ditc,h; detentipn, retentiqn, and/or inFilcration fEiciliCy
designeci to coniain ancl control SlonmvaCer.
K. "Swale" meauis a constrtiicted depression for the treatment and disposal of sionmwater
runoN'. The sw11e sfiall be designed by an engincsr IicEnsec{ in the state of Washington.
L. "Threshold Rcquirements" nieans che level of development, volume, or peak flow of
stormwater that must be controlled.
M. "Perfiorinancc Surery" melns a financial guarantee tllat infrastructure required for a
project will bc constriac[ed and csrtitiecl act;orcling lo t.he accepted plans and
specifications and all spEalicable staildards.
"Warrant}' Surety" meaus a financial guarantee against defects in the construction of
all requireci infrastrucxure for fl project.
Section 10.09.08.03. Regulated ActiviCies. 'Nln person on any public or private rea) property located
wit}1in tlie City, shall engage in the following regulated activities wi[hout frsl obtaining stonrwater
control approval from the City. The regulated activities for development are:
(1) Grading of land in excess of 500 cubic yards so as to require environmental review
pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Ack;
Cqnstivctian of ~r additi~~n to a buildin~~ cxcc t a sin ~le f~mi] ~ c~r du lex residenc~e
_ (2 > > n b.-' ` ) P _
or placement of impervious suriaces that exceed 5,000 sguare fect, and
(3) The subdivision, shoirt subdi<<ision and binding site plan process as clefned in RCVV
Chapter 58.17 and City Qrdinance.
Scction 10.09.08.04. Authority to develop and sdminister standards. The Director shall develop and
administer City Standards that relate to best management practices and the threshold requirements f'or tlle
dcvclopmcnt of s(ormwacer contral facilicies. The Director is 1'urther authorized to derelop nalicies that
relate to the submission and tnodification of storniwater, erosion and sediment control plans.
Requirements and performance standards that include best management prseciees shall be cfesionecl
to contro) and contain stormwater, reduce soil erosion and sedimentation through khe use of temporary
and permanent practices and facilir.ies. The reyuirements shall be designed to permit flexibiiity in the
choice of stormwater erosion and sediment control methods that mcet the speci6c circumstances of each
sitc and intended usc.
A. Review Process
Following submitlal of 1 request 1o ei7Ztige ii7 a regultjied tictivity; the Uirecta' shall revie«, tlte
proposed regulated 3ctivit), including any nlans or other submitted material. °1`he Director shall cleterrnine
whether the regulated activity is exempt frQm i•eview bascd upon the threshold requirements, or
alternutively, whether the regulated activiry_ complies with the standards, specilictitions and requirements
contained in the City scandartls. The Director may require the submission of additional material wid/or
analysis co allotiv the proponent [o demonserate compliance Nvith City Standarcls.
f~ J Section 10.09.08.05. Conditions of Approval. The Directar is authorized to impose dcvclopinent
` requirements qr conditions of approval for the regulated activities. The stormwater requirements or
Stormwater Ordinance OS-_ Paee 3 of 8
DRAf-T
conditions may be placed on tllc subdivision, binclino site plan, issued permit, or a recorded maintenanee --"1
,reement niay be placec! upon a parcel or Int where drainage faciliCies ~vill be developed. J
cavenant and ag
Conditions of approval shall be based on the Ci[y StAl1CI1rdS; the preliminary Site laraiiiage F'lan,
engineering repqt-#s or ather relevant data that: promotes stormwater control, protection of adjacent
propertics, utilities or other st:ormwater Pacilitics, 51ope stabilizkition and the environment.
'[`he recorded covenant and agreement shall be in substantially the following'f'orrn.
Y. " Btryer is pr.n°chasirlgfi'orn S'eller Lut Blvck . iir the ftna! plat of
recortle(i irr the recorcls r~f 1he Spoktrne Cviaq Ar.rdrtOr on
the _ clr.rv oj' , 200_, at volunre nf Plats, 1'age
siluuted ir1 Ilae Cit)+ uj,Spokcrrle* YalleJr, Spokutie Counly, Washingtnrt.
2.1 In accorclcurce lrith. Ihe firiul pl<.rt ui-rd the C'ondilivns ajftpproval thereof, the abovedescribed
Ivt contairrs art easernent forr.1 draina,ge stivale inlo rvlric6rstnrmi+,aterJlotitis frnnl Junlecl
'0 rfaces wrilhirr tlae plat trrul f'rar~ rnadtia.mj rntd sitle~vi,ll~s -uc1 crcent_to the plat.
'3. . Tlae draincige swole hci.s beeni cotlstrixtcil, sodded wit1~ grass, arrd irrrgated e&rtne 2led te o
~~r•inkl ef1rf~r~-~+f-s~~x. ;4. Tlze .Fcrrties desire to prvvide for the perpetual »rnintencnrce, re~?ur'r ~rrrd ,~eplucemerrr af i1re.
- ilrxrirrtrge__s~+,ale. atlcl its drv-igatiora s>>steir~. - - j
NOW TI•IEREI%URE, itt cvnsideraticm of tlae.markeal caventurts atlci cnrldrtrnrrs contained jrereiii
and the rECiicrls .staled above, 1he Purtie.s agree asfullows:
11. Buyi>>~ ugree.s to naaintuirr t/rc drtiifta,~►e .s~vc~le. vrr the lot clescribed aGc~ve bi> >rinwirrg;
fertilt?rrtg arul wCltering the gras.s in the stivade rv kec5p !!ie gras.r healthy arad iyre ,swale ivell- ' 'kepC iia alaJ~e~rrn~~c~c - • -
2. ~rtj%~.. ..,-~~.~-{•1tf.c1 f#e.~~1t~:r, ,.r.-, ,.l„ „f.~e~teEl~' . .
'e-ettxec-•te-~l-k~-f~e-~x~erfP-cti:or~sM-ix7feel-~N-i1~,. , .r,,..,.,.:b.,d r.~,£,-Fliid-IhCII BLfyer will-bc .
pr•0vir.le4?g cmc! pqyfrr~= for water tn ii•rrgate the druiriage s1vcile, .Tn trCltlition .l3u>>er agree.r tn
keep the tlrairrage sM,r.ile irrigation systern'irr good repciir untr fyrrctiniiarl ft~r its irltende.cl
patrposq.
3. _ 7314yer agre.es to remove lirter rnld debris frvnr.lhe drriinage swale and further agrees trat 1a
'aller the s{tape nr gr•ade of the druirrcrge sitiale rrorplace rr,q ubject.; strixlarre, or vehicle
ivithln the draiyrnge sivale.
4. 7'he City of Spokcnre fTtrlley ivill clernt dnd repair arr}1 dr}n+,01s, itrlels, undpipcs th.crt receive
rirrlofffram puhlic 1-rgl7t. of 1+1cr)l and cuqfuL~n to Ciry access 'standards. ~S. Auye►' imder.strnlds antl pbTrEes thr,r if the drait tage stinale is rra[ kepl und nluinluitred trs
providerllrei°Ein, the Cit), qfSPokrnie Vadletl may r.mclertake .sard.rriaintenai7ce and repair and
cdrar,~e.Buve,f~r 7t,s ltrbor ancl nrairtten['rrzce.
'G. _ The Agi•e.ement shu!l rtal with the land in pEr pet.rriry uvrle,s,s revoked G)! the City of ~Sl~okaf~e
. Yalley. " .
°I°he City may also enter into a development agreement with the person having Qwnership or control
of the real proptir[y t:hat is subject ro this Ordinance. Such development agreement shall be entered into
pursuant to RCW 36.7013.170, et. sec.
Section 10.09.08.06. Design Elements. Drainage fACilities wifhin single-family or ttivo-family
- - - - _ ' ,
residential subdiv isions shall be clesic,,ned as follows: ~
Stormwaier Ordin-Ance 05-_ Page 4 of 8
DRAFT
(1) Cont.inuous stivllcs running the length of the street located benveen the curb and sidewalk.
These swales shalt be within Cir.y riohc-of-way or «<itliin a horder easement granted to the
City, or;
(2) Consolidated ponds or swales that are locatecl on a separate tract or lot owne.d by a
horneowmers association or dedicated to tlie Ciiy. Consolidated ponds or swales are
acceptable on private conimercial clevelopments.
Section 10.09.08.07. !Desigi ►Vlethod. Drainagc poiids and swales located in Garrison or.other
stanctard soils shall use the eyuation belaw to tletermine the size of'the facility:
' V = 1133 A: where
V-= Volume of swale (cubic feet)
A= 1'ollution generatin •on impi:rvious surface (acres)
All swale designs within ttie City sh.All sye•cify the use nf an engrineered trcatment soil. This soilshall be
placed at a minimum thickness of six inches between the native soil ancl the sod layer..
Engine~ers designing drainage. faeilities located in non-standard soils must. submit a clesigi deviation in
accordimce with Sectian 9.08.08 and receive apUroval from the T)ircctor prior to utilizing the abnve
method in ihcir design. Geotechnical justifcation -will be reguired.
Sertion 10A9.08.08. Devifltions and Appeals
1. AuthoritY. The Uirect:or may grant a deviation from the requiremen[s of this Orclinance
or City Stanctards. In granting any devit►Cion, the Direct:or rnay prescribe conditions that
~ are deemed necessary or desirable for the public irit.cresi.
2. Deviation Criteria. No deviation shall be granced unless the applicant demonstrate.s, to
the satisfact:ion of the. Director, the followint:
A. Deviations are based upon sound engineering principles; best managernent practices
and are not inconsistent with the public interest in scarmwater control and envirorimental
protection; and
13. The Qrantin~ of the deviation ~vill not be unduly detrimental or injurious to ot1ier
properties in the vicinity arid downstrear».
C. The proposed deviation does not conflicc with or modiFy a eondition oCapproval.
D. Deviaeions iiieec requirements for safety; function; appearance, and maintainability.
3. 1'rior aDoroval: Any deviation shall be approved prior to acceptance of residential and
commercial construction plans and issuance of any building, approach, or site work
permits.
4. Right. of appeal: .All actions of the Direcior in the administration and enforcement of this
I chapter shaU be Imtil and eonclusivc; unless within 15 calendar days from notice ofthe
Director's ziction, t11c applicant or an aggrieved party files a notice of appeal with the
Hearing T;xaminer.
Seetion 111.09.08.09. Stormwater Pacilitv Construction and Certification. - All stormwater
faci.lities shall be complcted and certiiied by the proponent's entiineer prior to any final plat, short
r1 Plat, binding site plan, or tlie issuance of a permanent Certifcate of Occiipa»cy or fnal inspectinn
for any associated builcling. At the discretion of the Director; a test of the facility may be
performed ro demonstrate adequlte performance.. The test shall be perfonned in the presence of
Pubiie VJorks personnel.
Stormwater Ordinance 05- Page 5 of 8
DItAFT
Aecepfance of performance suretiES~in lieu of campletecl improvements shall be permit~ted onl}~ v.rhen
comple:tian of improvemen~.s prior to finTl land action or permanent Certificate of Occupancy is
iinPraetical (i,e., diie tO construction seasoii delays or other faetors beyotid the proponent's.control).
ln thc event that a perfonnanct; surety is accepted by the Iairector, the proponent will complete the
following measures prior t.o the release of the surety:
4. All aspects of the drainage facility, including landscaping; irrigation, and establishment.of
'specified vegetation; shall be completecl in accordance with the acceptecl plans on. file with:the
`City. The proponent's -engineer shall cercify the improvcrnents and. regueSt an oversight
inspection.from 1'ublic Wcirks personnel.
2.An cxception may be_granted for single-family or ttivo-family residential subdivisions where
the completion af the s«<ales is not practical until such time as the (Nvel(mgs are constructed. The
proponent slaall rough grade the swales to ihe.required volume ancl install all cir},wells, inlets, curb
drops and other structures in accordance wifh the acecpted plans on file-with.the City. Erosion
contrnl measures sLiall be_ inlplemented to protecr the installed drainage structures and Co pre.vent
erosion acidfor FaifLu-e oE the swalc side slqpes. Tbe completion bf the landscaping; irrieatinn,`and
~estahlishment of specified ve;etatian shall be required prior to issuance_ of the,_permanent
Certificate of Occupanc}'_or fintil inspection for any associated dwellino: ~
Awarranty surecy shall be submitted to the City upon successful cornpletian and certifeation of all public
improvements to guarantee a~ainst ctcfects '►n cAnstruction. The warranty surety ~vill be for a neriod of
rivo (2) years from the clate tlic faciliCy is acccpted by the City.
Secdon 10.09.08.10. Tnspection.
Thc Direetor is atithorized to feld inspect; as appropriate, street, building site, and drainage
construction to vcrify coriformar►cP 4victi City siandards and the conditions of approviil.
Section 10.09.08.11. PrqpertY Owner. Responsihiiities.
~ A. 7'he properl:}' owner SIIHU comply with provisions of tllis secl'iqn- and_ Ci .ry Standards.: The
prnpcrty~ o~vner sli~~ll, be responsible tnr repair, rescoration, and perpetual maintcnar~ce of tha stnrmNvater
facility`installed oii private properry and <<ny portion qf the svvale siCuated-in a public righf-of-way acljacent
co theirrespective praperties. For purposes of this chapter, `°repiiir and restoratiorr" shall;mean conforminb
the stormwatcr facilit), to tlie plans onfile Nvith the Cicy. Tltis responsibility co repair, rescore.and maintain
shall be imposed without regard to. an}' fault or wrongful intencion bn the part of the property owncr.
"Maintenance" aneans presei-N~atiUn of tlie. origin;il area, VplLune, conEiguratian and. funetion of the
stonmwater facility as described in the plans. "Nlainteriance". also includes mowing, irrigatung, aiid
replacing when necessary; 1.17e lawu t:urti within tlie swales. =1 he propeny owners_ within singlerfamily and
rivo-family residential subdivisions are not respqnsible for maintenance_ of stnictures sucli as clrytivells,
inlets, and pipes thai receive runoff fi'om public right: of,way arid conform to City access standards. The City
~ ti~ill mainlain the5e structures upon acceptanc~: O'tlle pul,lic.infrastTUCture.
~
of Spol.ane \alic•r
B. 'Che property owner is resporlsible for I:eeping open the drainage and stormwater eascments
on their property. If a drainage or srormwater casement is unlawfully encroached upon or tlie function of a
desigilatcd drainage or srornlwater easemcnt is recfuced, the property owner is responsiblc fpr removin?
the encrUtichment or detrirnent.
C. The property owne►- is responsible for (:eeping open mainCenance access easements serving
drainage facilities arid draina~e easeiilents.
D. The l'raperty owne,r sliail not place or permit, and shall immediately remove, vehicles,
equipment, objects, refuse, garbage or litier f'rom the Storm\vater F'acility. ' ~Stormwbter Ordinsnce 05-_ Page 6 of 8
DRAF1'
Seetion 10.09.08.12. t'ublic L7rainage Facilities. It shall bc unlawful for any person io throw,
drain; pow• or othei-wise discharge unauthorizcd waters or dther liquids onto City propert~y, rights-of-way;
or border e.ase.ments, witl~out written Permission of the Direct:ar. For purposes of this chapter,
unauthorized %tiratcrs include, hut are not limited to:
(a) Grounchvater from springs or otfier natw•al or artificial sourc;es, foundation drains,
sump nuiiips, arid otJ7er means of discharging groundwater to the surfacc; (b) Surfiice
water containing sediment; (c) Discharges from swimming pools, hot tubs, detention or
evaporation ponds; (d) WatGr fliSLhargGd from the cleaning of containers or equipment
used in laying, cutting, or processing concrete and mortar and the water used in sucll
proeesses; (e) Water dischargecl from the cleaning of equipment or containers holcling
paint solvents or similar contarninants; and (D Other wacer posing a safety hazard in the
travel way or tllat could reduce the effectivene.ss qf 5tormwater control and treatment
facilities.
Section 10.09.08.13. Failure to Compll' - Nuisancc.
;The f.nlloxving is cteclarc(i to be unlawful and a public nuisance:
(a) The placemen[,.cCnstruction, or installation of an}, Siructure withi.i], or t]te
c:on►iection to, a public Stonnwater raciliiy without w3•itten_permissionof the
Director; or
(b) 'the~discharge of stormwater to a public Stormwater Facility-withouf
perin i;sion oP the Uirector; nr
(r.) The failure to construct or maintain the -StoriT~~A~ater_ra-eility as ruiuirecl in the
~ perm.it or sitE drainage plan; or
(d) _ The placement or allnwing the placement of ve.hicJes, equirmenl, objecls,
refuse, oarbaoe, or litter Nvithin the stormwitter facility.
Sectiorl 9.08 is subjcct to the prc~visions of Sectiou 10.01.20: ofthe Spokane Vallc}T Uniform
L7evelopment Code. For pLu°pases of tllis scction "T)irecfor" shall be the UirECtor of Public Works.
Section 2. Kepealer. Provisions of the Spokane Countv-Cuiclelines for Stormwater vlanaaement in
cqnflict. are Iierebv repealed:
Section 3_ Severabilitv. lf iuiy section; sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to
be invalid or tmeonsticucional by a court of competent jw•isdiation, such iilvalitlity or uncnns[itutionality
shall not affe.ct the validity or c.onstitutionalit), of any other seccion, sentence, clause or phrase of this
Ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. Tliis Orctinance shall be io fu11 force and effect five (5) days afl:er dace of
publication of ttlis Qrdinance or a summary kliereof in the oCficial new;paper of the City.
YrISSED by the Cit_y Council ihis day of .2005.
ATTE-ST: Ntavor, Diana «%illute
City Clerk; Cliriscine Baiilbiidwe
Siarmwlter Ordinance'05-_ Page 7 of 8
171tAFT
.4PP120VED AS 7`() FOltiVl:
~
Taeputy City Attorney, Cary Drisl:cll
DAte of T'ubliGalion:
Lffective Iaate:
~ .
~
Stonmvacer Ordi.nance QS-_ Page 8 of 8
;CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
,
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 22, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ED consent Z old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) Petition
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Spokane Valley signed a petition to ihe State
Department of Ecology (DOE), regarding adoption, appeal and/or amendment of administrative
regulations WAC 173-201A-600 and WAC 173-201A-602 because of concerns with DOE's draft
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) report.
BACKGROUND: Regional wastewater dischargers covering the area from Coeur d'Alene, ID to
Long Lake, WA have been seeking a region-wide approach to improving the water quality,
including acceptable levels of phosphorus, in the Spokane River. Spokane County, which
provides wastewater treatment services to Spokane Valley, is facing some of the tightest time
constraints, because it has need of a plant expansion, and a corresponding discharge permit.
~
There is an effort underway for the area dischargers to collaborate with DOE and the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for an acceptable solution that meets the economic,
environmental and social needs of the area. However, according to state timelines, the petition
requires a response by February 25, 2005.
Attached is a draft letter to DOE. On February 16, there was a meeting of interested parties to
discuss the condifions under which the petitioners would be willing to withdraw the petition
without prejudice (i.e., be able to resubmit it in the future if necessary). The discussion was
based upon this draft letter.
DOE committed to having a response by Monday or Tuesday. Because of the critical timing of
this issue, staff will provide the DOE response at the Council meeting, along with any revisions
to the draft letter,
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to
agree fo the voluntary withdrawal of the UAA petition.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: NIA
STAFF CONTACT: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
AT7ACHMENTS
1. Draft letter to David Peeler, Manager of the Washington DOE Water Quality Program ,
DRnF7' 1 E7Tr R ,
David P2elEr, Manager
VJater Quality Progi'an1
jNashington Departrnent of Ecology
Dear NIr. Peeler:
Thank you fae your recent conunwil.cation widi Lts ;e-arcling the petition for adoption,
appeal and/oi• anlenclnient of adutinistrative regu_lations WAC 173-201A-600 and VdAC 17-3-
201A 502 (the "UAA Petition"). We understand ttse deadline Eor hhe D2pai•trnent to tal,-E
action i-vith re;ard #o the U<4 APetitia1i is FPbrnary 25, 2005. Ecology has proposed that the
Sponsoi-s of the UAA (tl,e "Petitioneis") and Eeolo~LI, zlgree to a cflul-se of action that will
facilitate negofiations becween the I'ztitioners ailtl E.aloay to resolve the Peiltioziei•s'
concenis NTith draft Submittal Report For the SpokGlnP Pvr-er Dissolved Oxygen Total
N1axi.nlum Daily Laaci that was issued U}, Ecolflhy aji SeptEniber 21, 2004 ("Draft Ti1OL").
The I'etitioners are prepared to voluntaril?~ vvizhd,•Gw the UAA Petition provicled that, on oa• '
before Februaa-V 25, 2005, the Dep1rtnzent a.na t•he i'etitioners a•each written agreeaneiit that
cQneains the followung terms:
1. The Petitioners' will voluntai•ily wii•hdr«-v the UAA Petition by 5 p.m. February
25, 2005, "witl,out prejndice." The UAuA Petition can be resubm,itted by any
vndividual I'etil•i.oner or all of ihe Petitioners at any tim@withoui addiiionaJ dala
or anal}jsis. The UAr'1 Report w•ill rer.iZin as part of the administrative record for
both the TMDL and the UAA.
2. Ecology wjll voluntarily hold in abeya•«e c;lui'ing the negotiations fl1e Draft
T?viDL upon receipt of a letter froin a.l] I etironei-s voluntari.]y wi#hdrawing the
UAA Petition. Ecology shall provids vrritten confirmatian of the abeyance of the
Draft TIAO[., to the Petitianers, vua elnaii ur fax communicati.o:n to John Spencer,
[insert here contact inforination] ,
3. Following wididrawal af the UAA Petition aPict abeyance of the Draft TMDL, die
. Washington Deparii-ilei-i} of Ecology VNa tei- Proa ants Manager, or the Du•ector of
the Depai•tnient of Ecology, and }he I'ki=ioners ivill negotiate, in good faith; a
• Ti'vJ.17L i.nnplementation plan thatvrill acb,ieve the Eol]pwin~ objeciives;
~ Provide a waste load allocation in the Spokane River far Spok-anE
Count;r's new sewa,F ireatnien•t planF, with waste load allocat-ions a.nd
NP1DES pernut Effluent liri,itations based an the Cotuit), canstructing and
,
;
operatulg afinal efftuenr f.iltration wastewatPr treatmEnt plant ;or at least
?p years; • Provicle innplenlentalion schedude; foi• 2ach niu.nicipal and ind.usiz•ial
PEtitioner t•har allows-suffic_ent •:iine for reas4nable capital debt
redemption for Petitioners po ii-i1p1_ement final fiita•ation or equivalent
technolo,y.
• DeveiaU ui a collaborative proces: w-ith the Petitioners a camprehensivE
Use Attainabi.lifij- Alialysis fot d-,e Spokane River by Auc-ust 31, 2005, and
initiate the rulemalong process by Deceinber 31,200/
S
• Dzvelop a joint agi•eement to iml?leinent a watershEd based phosphorus
iIODi-j701ri1' 50L11'CE C011t1'Ol p1'pgp-aiTi.
4. lEcolog}J wiIl hoid in abeyaaice dusird~ the pend~cy of this negotiatian adoptien
af the 2002/2004 303(d) list of "impaired `vaters" ror the Spokanz River-.
j. Ecologytivill pi•oceed with tinlely reissunace or aclministrative extensions af all
expired ancl expiruig NI'DES pernut-s to au#horize cantinuing municipa] and
industrial Lftscha.rges by the Petitioners i?asEC,i on existing permit conclitions and
technoiogies pending the adoption of a:;.na] TMDL.
T1ie UrAA Petitio3iers welcorne the Departneiit of E:oloby's uiferest in constructive
discussions fo ac}iievz siA Zificant and i-iieal1bighv unprovements to the Spokane Puver water
quality. We axe prepared ta coirmut to aggressive and ~ood €aith negotiaiians to
expEditiously resoive the pending UAA antt TivICL issues. T1iis of;er will expire at Noon,
on February 23, 2005. We lool< forward to hearin~ oi~1 you quiCkl}~. 1n the .zntej'est in
facilitating communica#ions, please dii-ect iltu-tlie}- ,-ni»municatians to John Spencer at
,~-%rho will provide yOtl.d' PeSpOIiSe CO tI'lE Pct1t16TF2Y'S.
S11'tCefely,
UAA Sponsors and Peb.iloners:
~ j
~q•~ Q PET,. iON FOR ADOPTION, AMENDMEh., OR REPEAL
OF A STATE ADMINISTRATIVE RULE (RCW 34.05.330)
a;~.
,ti~» •
The Office of Financinl Managemcnt (Of°Ivl) has adopted this {orm for enenibers of thc public who wish to petieion a state
agency to adape, amend, or repcal an sdirunistraiive rule (regulation). Pull consideration will be eiven to a petitioner's
request.
Please com. Icte the followin :
PE't'171UNFJt'S NAME (PL.Lr1Se PRfNT) 'IELEF710NE NfJL16F~t (INCF.UDING AREA CODE)
C!'fY OF SPOKANE (509) 625-6250
CoUNrY OF Sror-arrE (509) 477-7289
F:.qlSSR ALUNtNifA1 (509) 927-63$0
1NLAND GMPIkE I'APER (509) 924-191 I
CrrY 0F CORust D'ALENE (208) 769-2277
HAYDFdJ ARE.A RCGIONAL SEWIIt BOARD (20$) 772-0672
CnY OF SPOK-kNE VAt.LEY (509) 921-1000
t.teEtn LnECC sEwFx nxn waTEt n3srRJC'r (509) 922-9016
C!'1'Y OF POST FAL1S (509) 777-9857
NAM.E A17151tESS CITY STATE ZiP CODE
CIIY OF SPOK.vrE $08 W. SPOKNNE SPoraxe WA 99201
E'AIlS BLVD
COUN'I`l' 0F SPOKANE 1 I 15 W. BROnnwAY SPOKANE WA 99260
w+iSrR u.cmlrnIvNi P.O. Box 15108 SPOKANE wA 99215
1tiLAND EMPIRF PAPER 3320 NOR7H SPOKANE WA 99206
ARGONWE ROAD
CITY QF COEUR D'AL.ENE 710 M[f4LEN AVQJUE COEUx ID 83814
D'ALENE j
HAYIahN AFtEA REGIOT'AL SEWER 130ARD 171 E. HAYDIIV AVE. HpYDEti L,A}:E [D 83835
CTfY OF SPO}:.4NE VALLEY 1 l 707 E. SPRAGUE SPOKANE WA 99206
VALLIiY
LBERTI' LA}:F SEWER AND R'ATEIt ~310 E. ~t ISS10N i
~~S~rK~Cr - ~[~~~TY «n 99019
[.Af:F
Cff'Y 0F POST Fr1LLS 408 SF'OI:ANE STRF_ET pOST FALLS
En 83814
AGENCY RESPUKSIBLE FUR ADMINISTL•R1NG TFI13 RiJU
Wr1SNI1~`GTOT.' STATF DkP.AK'f~iEfi'T 01' ECOLOGY
Plesse subttiit completed and sierled forni to the "Rules Coorditintor" at the appropriate snte agency. Thc agency will
contsct you within 60 days.
Check all tbat app(y below and explain nn thc back of this form with examples. Whcncver possible, attaeh sugeested
language. You may aitach other pages if needed.
1:' ;NENV:_ 1 arii,rcquesting'thatanew WA'C`hedevclopecl.-. • . . . 't ~ _ , ~ .
1 believe a new rule should be developed.
❑ The subject of this n►le is:
❑ The rule will affect the following people:
❑ The need for the rule is:
sooe~sos.oa
~ 2. AMENll: I am ...yuesting a change to cxisting WAC 173-~Lv; A-Fi00, Tsble 600 and WAC 1.73-
201 A-602, Tablc 602 far RrIZIA 54-I,.ower :Spolcane anci V1r1~lA 57-il-1idd le.Spoka ne (see attac:hed
propused amcnded re;ulatury languxgc)
-'0. , 3. REPEAL: I am requcsting existinh V1'AC be rernoved.
T helievc this rule should hc chanhed or repealed because (check one or more):
[]X ii does nat do what it was intended to do.
~ It imposes urireasonable costs.
❑ It is applied differently to public and privatie parties.
❑ it is not clear.
❑ lE is no longcr neecfed.
❑ lc is not at!4horizeci. The agency has no authcirity co make this rule.
❑ It conflicts with another federal, state, or local law or nlle. Please list number of the conflicting law or
rule, if known:
❑ It duPlicatrs anocher fecleral, state or loLal law or rule. Please list number of the duplicate lsw or rule, if
}uiown:
(X Other (please expiain): Please see attached.
t
SQa3?303A2
KrUSER AT UM MUM
BY DA'fE: ~
50<E930S.0¢
cin, pr sF'CIkANL VAI.LGY
/
13Y DATE:
. ,
sossswe.na
PL-'Cl'I"IONEK'S SICNATUItES:
C11'Y OI' SPOI:.ANE ` F3Y DATE:
,
i
SOCE9306A2
CouNTY oF sP4KANr;;
APF'kOVEC~ E~Y ~E BonttD or' cotn.IrY con~r~.~iIssIonr~.~zs or° srot:nrvE ~:ouN~rY,
WASNNGTO\' TH1S llAY OF 17ECEMF3Elt, 20U4.
PF1fL[..lP I). fIA}LRIS, CHAIR
M. KATE MCCASLIN, VICE-CHAIR
TODD N1EILiCE, COA7MlSSIONE12
50484106.Q?
tNr.AiNm riMrniE PnpEx
gY DA'CL`:
,
.
SoaSD;n3.o2
CI'Cl' AF CQEUR A'A[.fNr
13Y DA'1`E:
f ~
SOf 99303A?
idr1YDEN AREA REGION'AL SL-WER NOAk.Ia
~
13Y UAT'E; '
~
sws9sa&oz
CCI'Y OE S['0}:A\G VAI.I,.GY
By llA'CE:
' _l\
SOdfl9]08.D2
L16Elt`CY L!4F:E S[WER Ah`D WA'I'EIt DISTk]CT
.
i
BY DATE:
.
soeas~os.o:
_ C[TY OF POS'f FALi.S
r'
(3y Dr\i'E-
5046930G.02
PROPO.5ED LANGUAGF FOR .A]VIENDML-N`I' TQ WAC 173-20.1A-b00, TABLL 6UU
AiV.l) PVAC 173-20111-602, IABLE 602
(Yi'IIIA 54-L0 W1;K Sf'01►'ANF A11rD WIZLA S 7-1tf1IDDLE .SPDIiA1VF)
WAC 173-20:1A-600, Table 600
'1'ahle 600 (Ke to Table 602
Abbreviation General Descri tion
aquatic Lifc Uses: (see WAC 173-201 A-
200(]))
Char Char. For the protection of spawning and
early tributary rearin€ (e.g., first year
juveniles) of native char (bull trout and
Dolly Varden), and other associated aquatic
life.
Core Sal.mon/Trout Salmon and trout spawning, core
rearing, and rnigration. For thc
protecti4n of spawning, core rearing, and
migration of salmpn and trout, and other .
~
. associated aquatic life.
~
Nloncore Salmonl`i'rout Salmon and trout spawning, noncore
rearing, aiid nugratiun. For che
protection of'spawning, noncore rearing, and rnigration of salmon and trout, and
other associated aquatic life. .
Sal.rnon/'T`r4ut Rearing Salmon and trout rearing and migration
only. For the protection of rearing and
migration of salmon aad trout, and other
associatcd aquatic life.
Redband Trout Non-anadroinous interior redband trout.
For protection of waters where the only
trout species is a non-anadromous forrn of
self-reproducing interior redband trout (O.
mykis), and other associated aquatic life.
.i
PROFOSED Lqi.'GUAGE FOR A"cj'4bML`•N'C Tp WAC t 73-201 A-60Q, TABLE 600 .s WAC 173-201 A-b02, TAB.LE [0?
Warrn Water Species Indigenous warrri water tipecics. For the
;protection of waiers where the dominant
speeics tmder natural conciitions would be
temperature tolerank indigcnoLis non-
saLmonid species. Examples include dace,
redside shiner, chiselmouth, sucker, aud
northem pikemimiow.
Lonz ]-ake Reservoir Mixed Fisherv Brown t'roul tipawninq, trout rcar•inLy,
(Spokane River From Long Lake Dam foraging. and migraticin. For the
jriver mile 33.91 to 'NTine Mile Bridae friver Frot.ection of indieenous and non-
rnile 58.0 indip-enous 6sh species and oiher
associated aquatic life, inclijding ja] cold-
water snecieS summer rearinp- and
mi~,Tration in d1e lnivenne and tt'ansitioll
reaches arad in the epilini.nion and
metalimnion in the lacustrine ueacli; fbl
browm trout spay.,nina between Nine :Mile
Dzna axid the Little Snokane i2.iver: fcl
cool- and warm-watcr specics snawning,
summer rearing, anci mi, ation in the
riverine and iz'ansition reaches; and fdl
cold-water snecies summer foraginQ below
the euPhotic zone.
Spokane R.ivei Cold- and Cool-Water I.ijuited trout spawgxn~, reaxxz~~, aDsi
Mixed Fishen, fSpokatie :Claver froni Nine miLyration. For the 12170tection_ of
Mile Bri&-,e ('rivEr mile 58.01 to the ldaho indieenous and non-uidi^enous cold- and
border (,river mile 96.571 cool-water fish species; limited spaaming,
rearin(y. and migration Qf rain,bow trput;
and otlaer associated aauatic life
;
50489308.02 -2-
PROI'OSED LANGUAGT: FOR AMENllN1ENTT0 WAC 173-201A-600, TAT31.r 600 Ar°n wnC 173-201A-602, TAHI,E602
WAC 173-201A-602, Tabie 602
'1°ARI,,F 602 Aquatie Life Uses Recreatianal Water Supply Niisc. Uses
Uses Uses
Use Designations for Presli Waters by Watc.r
Resouree Inventory Area (NVRTA)
o '0 ~ o
a.
[ O~ •2 O U O 0
r ca ~ N ;p 'y7 c~•S
Q ✓ 3 ~ ~ qL~ ~ •
E cc '0 J L~ r`~ 'w ~ '7~' •O n
U cy > y . E: ~ ~ c ~ tn ~ ~ ,a c~3• C (Y] J
d) -w
'v7 • ~ rn ~ ~ d
Cd w x o
U C v) p 4
E
~
Z ri 3 ti ar~ r ~
M.~''.~~.e_W:~S;pn~Ea~E' y`'-Ei~-'~
Spokane River from mauth to Long I.,.ake ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Dzm river mile 33.9).'
Spokane River from Long Lake Dam
(river mile 33.9) to Nine Mile Bridge ~ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
river mile 5$.0 .2-4
Spokanc River from Nine Ivlile Bridge
(river mile 58.0) t:o t:he ldaho border ~ ✓S ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
river rnile 96.5 ,3 s
Notes for WFtIA 54: Thesc criteria tAke precede.ncc over the dissoh~ed uxvtcu'criteria in WAC 173-201A-200. 1. Temperacure shall not exceed a 1-DMar of20.0°C due to humdn activities. NVhen natural conditioris exceed a 1-DIviax of 20.0°C, no temperature increase wil) be
allowed which will raise the rceeiving water temperature by oreater than 0.3°C; nvr shall such temperahire increases, at any time, exceed t= 34/(T + 9).
2. The average euphotic 2one concentration of total phosphorus (as P) shall not cxcecd 25pg/L clutvtS the period Of June 1 to October 31.
Temperature shall not erceed a 1-DV]ax of 20.01C, c{ue to human activities. When natural coriditions exceed a I-DMas of 20.0°C, no tempcraturc iiicrease «<i!l be
allowed which will raise the receiving water ternperature by breatcr than 0.3°C; nor shall such temperature increases, at any tiine, exceed t= 34/(T + 9).
3. Temnerature shall not exceed 1 l-DMax of20.0°C due to human aciivities. \TJt1en natural conditions exceed a 1-DiN9as of20.U°C iio temperaturc increase will be
allowed Nvhich will raise the receiving water temperature by greater than 0.3°C; nor shall such temperacurc increases, at any time exceed t=34/(T+9).
50489308.0r••._ _
FROPOSI:D I.,ANGUACE rOR AMENDMENT TO WAC 173-20 LA-600, TABT.G 600 ANA 1V,qC 173-201 A-602, '1'Af3LL 602
4. The 1-d3v minimum water column averaQe 17is.colvecl Oxv en f.0.1 criteria for the iverine nortian of the reservcir are 6.4 mblL from .hjiv 1 throueh Seatembcr
14 and 8.0 m--/L from Sentetnber 15 thtou.l Jtine 30, `i fie 1-dav iuuiimtim water colurrui averaef, D.O. griteriUU for the 1'vinsitional. Lacustrine-rpilirnnioii, ancl
Lacustrinc-Metalimninn oorlionc of the reservoir is 6.0 tnolT, when the. reservnir is thermallv stratified (normallv froan .Tulv 1 tllrotigh September 30). Ths !-daw
minimtun ,v,itQr coltamn averaee D O crilerion for the Lacustrine-Upper Hyroolimnion portian of the reservoir is 5.0 mk/L Nvhen the reser-%,oir is stratified 'I'he 30-
dav averaze of the daily ntinintunn water colutt avemPe L7 U(;ritQ[iQt (3f1-DADlvlin) fo the I'tiverim 1'opsitional Llcustrine-Epilimnion and Lacush'ine-
Mc.talimnion poriions of the reservoir is 8.0 mQIL when the resenroir is the.rmallv skratified. The I-di1V (111111111U[ll wBtCP COIUlT1f1 flYCi'8HC D.O. Ci]tCr101] COi the efli.lt'Z
re5ervoir is 8,0 ntP/l wl en the reservoir is not stCatiliecl Where condi ion of Ga •oinetric uressu e ril[itude and wster temncrature nreclude 3ttainment of ihfse
D O criteria D O levelc miist not be leas than 40 oercent sptu -at'on ln addicion sQurscs of QhosplQnLs_anust demonstrate prog-ress towards maximizing the volurne
of Uie Lacustrine-Lawer Hvaolirnnion that is suitable for short-term foraeine bv fish, with a lone-temi Poal of achievinE :t wlter column sveraee. D.O. value of 4.0
mp/L as a I-dav minimum in this nortion of the reservoir. `l'he delineatian of these nortions of dle reservoir will vorv in timiny- and location. Iaowever, the Riverinc
nortion will be all dcpths generallv from River Mile fRAQI 53 to RM 53 the Transitional nortian will be all deotlt eeneeallv fron► IZIvS 53 to Rvl 46and the
Llcustrineportion will be e4nera1lv from RIv146 to RA9 34. Thc dclincation bcriveen the Metalimnion and Ui2ner I-Ivtaoluiuiion of the Lacusirine pnrtion will
normally be from z depth of 9 tu 12 meters Uelow the water surfacc. 1'he delineadion betwecn the Uopcr and LoNver nortions of thc Mvuolinvtion will be that dcpth
Nvhere the D.O. concen[ration is ereater than 5.0 me/L.
5. The t dav minimum water coltimn averaae D O sriceria for iliis sub-czteem of tase are 9.5 me/L fi'om April 1 ehruuUh Mav 31 6.0 mg/L for Jtine 1 tlirouUh
Sentem er 30. a[td 8.0 mp-/L Car Oetobrr ! throueh March 31. The 30-DADVIin D.O. criteria for this sub-cat.egoey of use are 11.0 mpJL for Anril I tltroue11May 31
and 8.0 m/i_ for June l tLLrouWh Sencember 30. Wliere coriditions of barunie[ric pri.ssure, altitucle. and water temneraturs oreclucle attainrnerEt of thr.sc D.O. criterig.
D.O. ]r.vels rnust not be less than 90 nercen[ sahiration,
50459308.02 4-
PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR AMEiNI7MENT TO WAC 1 i3-201 A-6UU, TrlBLE 600 AN'D W/AC 173-201A-602, TA.13l.E6U2
TABLE 602 Aquatic LiCe Uses xecreational Water Supply Iviisc. Uses
Uses Use.s
Use Designations for Fresh Waters by Water
c
Resource Inventory Area (WRIA)
~ a aq ~ C • n, o
G 4, 0 C ~ ~ i~
o x U o U ~ r E ~ oo ~
°r ~ tJ r n ~
~ 0 ~ 'N~;,' v t/~] ~ o~J' v r ~ ✓ ~ ~ ~
t a ~ ~ > ~ ~ :C~ rs r ~ x ~ l Q ~
0 .0 y ~i G C J y ~ U CS ~ W
V1 ~ CO V ~ ~ J 0 b r~ r~ ~
~ o ~ y 3 ~ x a N Q ~ cn
~ C E
x c
o
7- ri1 ~ } U
~++..r~, i " : r 't .
~ ~.:.~-~~~~~~~~:~,.~.~ok~'►n ~.s-. ~ M~.~„'WN -?.-''T.,ake Creek and all tributaries. ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Spokane River from Nine Mile I3ridge
(rivcr mile 58.0) to the Idaho border ~ ✓a ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
river mile 96.5 .1'?
Notes for VVRIA 57: 1'hese criteria take precedence over Itte dissolved axyQen criteria in WAC 173-201A-200.
1, Ternperature shall not exeeed a 1-TaMax of20.0°C clue to human activities. When natura] conditions cxceed 'a 1-DMax of 20.0°C, no temperature increase will
be allowed .vhich will raise the receiving water temperature . by greater than 0.3°C; nor shall such te.mperature uicreases, at any time, exceed t= 341('I' t 9).
2. The 1 dav minimum water column averaee D 0 criteria for this sub-catepgorv of use am 9.5 mp-lL 1'roin April 1 throueh Iviay 31 6 me/l for lune 1 ihrQugh
Senteniber 30 and 8.0 melL for October 1 throuelt March 31 Tl e 30 DADMin 17 O criteria for this sub-cateaarv of use are 11.0 meli for Anril 1 ttirough_
Mav 31 and $ mg,11 for June 1 throuPh Seatember 30 11'here conditions of barametric oressure, alfihide, and water temaerature nreclude atcainnient of chcse
D.O. criteria. D.O. leve.ls must not be less than 90 percent saturation.
_
50489308.02:~ ~
I'R01'OSE[7 LANIGUAC'L' EOR P`•1ENUMEINT TQ WAC 173-201A-600, TAHLT: 600 ""D WAC 173-201 A-fip2, TARLE 602
A7'1'ACF1iVT_t;N'1 'T'U PLT'I1'lUN FC)i't AR'1LA \`DV1ENT (7I+
~
' WAC 173-201A-602; 't'ablc 602 for NVfY.CA 54-1..mver Spokane ancl W.KI_A 57-iViiddlc Spokane
i
The following additional infoiYnation is provided iu support of the Fetition:
This Fetition proPoses fo-amend WAC 173-201 A-600, Table 400 anci WAC 173-201 A-602,
Table 602: for VdR1A 54-L.ower Spokane and 'ATIZIA 57=Middle Spokane, as set forth in the attached
skrilce-througli proposed regulacory ame.ndment. The amendment to WAC 173-201A-600, Table 600
and WAC 173-201A-602, Table 602 for NATIZL.A 54-L.ower Spokane and W`1t1.A 57-Middle Spokane is
necessary for the reasons set forth in the Petition, including this AttachrnEnt, and the Spokane River
and Long Lake Reservoir Use Attaulability fnalysis ("Spokane River UAA") repart, which is attached
ta this Petition. State and federal regulaiions allow uses in waterbodies to be revised tluougli a Use
Attainability Analysirt ("L1A.A") (VvAC 173-201 A-440; 40 CFR 131.10).
Federal regulations (40 CFR 131.3[g]) clefine a iJA..A as a struciured scientific asscssment of
the factors affecting the attai.nment of the use that may include physical, chemical, biolobical, and
economic factors. Section 131.10(g) provides that a UA.A is justified if the State can demonstrate that
aliaining the currently designated use is not feasible because of any one of six specific faciors,
includinb either of the followuig:
4) Dams, diversions or other types of hydrologic modifications
prcclude the attainment of the use, and it is not feasible to
rest4re the water body to its origuial condition or to operate
suc)i moclitication in a way that would result in the attainmeut
of the use; or
5) Physical condiiions related to the natural fcahires of the water body,
such as the lack of a proper substratej cover, flow, depth, pools,
riff1cs, and the like, unrelated to water quality, preclude attainment
of aquatic life protection uses; or.
The Spokane River UAA rcport defines the existing aiid attainable uses for the Spokane ft.iver from the
Washington and Idaha Statelinc (Stateline; Rivcr Mile ["RM"] 96) to I,ong Lake I7am (kZM. 34), based
on the above Cwa factors (either of wliicv is suff.icient to result in modifying the use).
Currently dcsignated uses for the SpQkane River are based on a statewicle system of
caiegorizing rivers anci lakes under a class-based sysiem that does nUt include a specific assessment of
the existin€ and attainable uses for the Spokane River. The Clean Waier Act also requires the
Washinbton State Department of Ecology ("Fcology") to prepare a tqtal maximum daily 14ad
("7NDL") analysis and impleulentation plan for rivers and lakes that do not meet surface water quality
standards. If a TIv1DL is prepared without specifically defining existing and attainable uses for a
. «aterbody, the TA4DL miglit use inappropriate surface water quality standards and, thus, develop
inappropriate pollutatit loading allocations for khat waterbody.
EcoloDy is currently developing a dissolved oxygen ("ll0'°) rMi7L plan for the Spokane River
doµmstream of the Stateline Bridge (RM 96) to Long I..ake ]aam (RM 34; Ecology 2004e). The TNMT)L
will establisli rzgulatory limits on the discharge of pollutants ttiat contribute to the drop ui DO levels
50489308.02 -6-
PkOPOSEU LANGUAGE FOk P*1El`1DV4EN'C `f0 wAC 173-201 A-600;'1'At3LE G00 `11)WAC 173-241 A-b02, TnBl,.E602
below surface water quality standards. [n the case oClhe Slaokane l'tiver, the primary axygen-
consiuning pollutant is phosphorus. ,
~
With regard to the Spokane River, a eonsortiuin of stak.eholclers eame together to prepare the Spokane River UAA report in order to evaluate surCace water quality standarcls thai are appropriate and
necessary to protect existing and attainable uscs of the Spokane River based on the 1_)AA factors
ref.errecl to above. The_ goal of the Spokane River UAA sponsors is to assure the protcction of the
Spokane River by achieving surfac:e water quality stanciards thai are boih attainable and protective of
exisiing and attainaUle uses.
The Spokane River UAA evaluatcs the biological and ecological basis for the clesignatian of
existing and atiainable uses and recommends use desie,,nations and criieria appropriate to the Spokaue
River and I qng Lake Reservoir. An in-depth asscssment of in.f.ormatian obtained &om almost 300
documents was u,5ed to dcvelop the Spokane River U A1A. The ciocument sources include state and
federal environmental agencies, tlhe Spokane Tribe of Indians ("Spokane Tiibe"),14ca1 agencies,
universitics in Idalio and Washington, and Avisia Ucilities ("Avista"). (See Appendix C of the
Spokane River UAA for a list of sources.) T'he source dacuments span stLidies from 1933 to 2004.
Fisheries specialists, ecologists, and water resources and modeling experts evaluated this information
and developed the recouunenclations contained in this report. (See Appendix G of the Spokane River
UAA for resumes of contributing authors.) '
The Spokane .R.iver UAA spousors include representativcs from the followivg industries and
municipalitics in botti Wa,ahington and ldaho:
1. City of Spokane
. ~
2. Cit}, of Spokane Valley
3. Spokane County
4. City of Coeur d'Alene,ldaho
5. City of Pc>st Falls
6. Hayden Regional Sewer azld Water Uistricc
7. Liberty Lakc Sewer and Water District
8. ICaiscr Aluniinum Corporaiion 9. Inland Empire 1'aper Campany
In the absence of specific current guidance, the Spokane River TJAA has drawn frocn existing
regulations, the Che_sapeake Bay UAA, and numerous ather UAAs; cither adopted nr underway. The
SpokanE River UAA report 11as tluee major elements:
1. Biological assessment and recommenclation of designated uses and criteria (Fart 2)
2. Implementation plan (I'art 3)
3. Economic assessment (Part 4)
~
50489308.02 -7•
PROPOSED 1.A?JGUAGE FOIt ~''ENDIb4EN'T TO Wr1C 173-20IA-600, TARLE 600 "I[7 WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602
Biological Asscssnient and Recommendation of Uesignaicd Uses and Criteria (Part 2)
~
P'or Purposes of the biolod cal assessment, the Spokane River, bcginning at the outlet of Coeur
d'Alene Lake in Idaho, was divided into riverine (R.N1 112 to P,AI 58) and riservoir (RM 58 ta 17:u1 34)
cegnents. The Spokane 1Z.iver UAA report, wliich is incorporated into this Petilion, contain5 detailed
recocnmendations covering the Spokane River frGm the Stateline (R,M 96) to I..ong Lake Dam (1tM
34). T'►ese are Summarirecl aS rollAws.
Spokane River (RAI. 96 to ltNi 58):
A ncw subcategory of use, refcrred to as "Spokane River Cold- and Cool-Water Mixed
Fishery," should be established in Washington's surface water quality standards. This subcategory
prnvides for:
• The protectiUn of indigenous and non-indigenous cold- and cool-water fish species and otlier
associaled aquatic life
• Limited spawn.ing, rearing, and migration of rainbow trout
• A more site-specifc ternporal applicalion of biUlogically based criteria
Tlle table below provides a sumnlary of recommended DO criteria for the riverine reach (RM
96 to RM 5$).
Spokane River Cold- and Cool-Nfater Mixed Fishery (RM 36 to RA4 58): Summary of Recommended DO Chteria
Gco9raPhic Area April to May June to September October to March
Entire River
1-Day Minimum Value 9.5 mg/L 6.0 mglL 8.0 rtglL
30-DADh4in Value 11.0 mglL , 8.0 rng1L
pADPAin Value = day average of the daity minimum '
Lar:b Luke Reservoir (RM 58 to RIv[ 34):
A new subcategory of use, referred to as "Long Lake Reservoir Mixed Fishery;" should be
esiablished in Washington's surface wat.er quality standards. This subcategory provides fqr:
•'1'he protection of indigevous and non-indigenous fis11 spccies and otticr associated aquatic lif e
• Trout rearing, which exists within this reach • A more site-specific temporal and geographic applicatiou af biologically based criteria
This subcategory rclies on a scasonal and reservoir zone application of T)0 criteria, whicll
protects the most sensitive life stages of salmouids (notably, rainbow trout) when and where those life
stages occur_ Similar to the. Chesapeake Bay system (EPA, 2003b), reconunended uses and 170
criteria for Long Lake Rescrvoir vary dcpending on the location in the reservoir where different life
J
54789308.02 -3.
PkUYOSED i„A, 7GCir\GE FOR.'•' ~ENDViLN'C TO 1VAC 173-201 A-600, 'CAE3LL' b00 'Nia WAC 173-201 A-602, TAi3I..r 602
stagcs and activities need to be siipporied_ `l"he table below summarizes the recommended DQ criteiia
for the Long Lake Tteservair reach (RM 58 to RM 34).
~
Long Lake Reservoir PAixed Fishery (RhA 58 to RI14 34): Summary of Recommended DO Criteria
Geographic Area July to September' October to June
Riverine
1-Day Minimum VatuE 6.0 mg/L 8.0 mg/L
30-DADMin Value 8.0 mg1L - -
Transidonal
1-Day Minimum Value 6.0 mglL 8.0 mglL
30-DADMin Value 8.0 mglL - -
Lacustrine - Epilimnion
1-Day Minimurn Value 6.0 mg/L 8.0 mg/L
30-DADMin Value 8.0 mglL - -
Lacustrine - Metal+mnion
1-Day Minimum Value . 6.0 mglL 8.0 mg/L
30-DADMin Value 8.0 mglL - -
Lacustrine - Hypoiimnion (Upper)
1-Day Minimum Value 5.0 mg/L 8.0 mg/L
30-DADIbSin Value - - - - LacusErine - Hypolimnion (Lower)
1-Day Minimum-Value Narrative 2 8.0 mglL
30-DADPiIin Value - - - -
~ To proEact carty brotiwn trout spavrners, thc recommencJed winter DO reservoir criterian (8.0 mg/L
applied as a 1-day minimum) should also bE applied within the riverine reach from mid-September
(September 15) tttirough the end of September (September 30). (The winter criterion already applies
beginning on October 1.)
2 The narrative criterian for the lower hypolimnion (expected to be less than 12 percenf of the
reservair volumo cluring August when the warmest temperatures and lowesf DO levels are observed)
requires sources to maximfze the "suitable volume' (defined as water with temperatures below 200C
and DO levels above 5.0 mg/l). The narraUve criterion also includes a tong-term goal io achieve a'i-
day minimum DO value of 4.0 mg/L on a spatialty averaged basis. This narrative criterion will be
implemented via the TAhDL process since it requires that point and nonpoint sources conEinue to
implement oontrols that minimize the volume of arater that falls below 5,0 mgll.. Given that low DO
values have been consistently obserred since the 1970s, cantinued improvements io benthic
conditions will ensure Wt existing uses within the lower hypolimnion will continue to be protected.
DADMin = day average of the daily m9nimum
i
~
50489308_02 -9-
PROPOSE!) LANGUnGE FOR P`QFNDNtFNTTO WAC 173-20[.1-600,'i'rV3L[i 600 "vD VI+AC 173-201A-602, TA$Lr-.b02
Dissnlved Oxy,;err Saturation Considerutions:
The above reeommendati4ns for UQ criteria do iiot take into account the fact that DO conc;entrations
are a Funetion of water temperature anc] elevatian, in addition to the ot}ier fc-iciors alreacly cliscussed at
length in the Spokane River UA.4 report. As a result, the DO criteria showcl in the two tables above
should be applicable tuiless barocnetr-ic pressure, altitude, and water temperature conditions preclude
attainment of these criteria, in which case UO levels should not bc less ihan 90 percent saturation. A
perceni saturaticm qualifier is included in boch the Idaho and Oregon surface water quality standarcls.
Fcology has recognized the importance of tliis in another recent process on the Chehalis River
(L=cology, 2004g). Deficit Criterion nf 0.2 mg/L Dissolved D:zygen:
State surface water quality standards contain a criterion allowing for no mare than a 0.2 mglL
deficit in la0 fiom "natural or backgraund" water quality where natural qr backgraunci water quality is
less than the established standard. The outcome related to the Draft TVIDL (Ecology, 2004e) is almost
totally driven by Ecology's conclusion that there is no assiinilat.ive capacity in the system for point
sources. Ecology reaches this conclusion because of its application of the 0.2 mg(L DO deficit
criierion to Long Lake Reservoir. The Spokane River UA.A report provides analyses that explain why
the 0.2 mg/L DO deficit criterion should not be applieci to the reservoir, which is not a natural system,
and recommends that this criterion not apply to the reservoir. 'T'he attaclied strike-ttuoueh version of
WF1C 173-201A-600; Table 600 and WAC 173-201A-602, Table 602 (WRiA 54-Lower Spokane and
WRIt1 57-Middle Spokane) contains the Petition's requcsted amended regulatory language.
Attuinable Surfcice Wuter Quality Standurds:
The Spokane River UAA biological assessment has shown that Ecology's current surface water
quality criteria (9.5 mg/I. absolute T)O level and 0.2 mglI, differential Ia0 level) cannot be met a high
percentage of the time; regardless of trEatment scenario, including rcinoving the poini source loacls
entirely from the Spokane River. One the other hand, the criteria proposed in the Spokane ltiver UAA
(protective of existing anci attainable uses) can be rnel under most conditions, even recngnizing the
severity of 2001 low flows as the basis for the evaluation_ •
lmpleinentatinn Plan (I'art 3)
Parallel to this Spokane.River UA.A Prdcess, local stakeholders have been engaged in the
TVMDL process and have developed notencial implementacion stratejies. For exdmple, Spokane
County and the City of Spnkane jointly sponsored a one-day workshop on August 23, 2004, to evaluate
advanccd wastewater treatment techuologies (CH2M IIlLL, 2004; Appendix F of the Spokane River
Ut1A). The main objcctive of this worl:shop was to identify all proven aud emcr€ing technoloo es and
to esiimate what ranges of effluent phosphonis concentraiions could bc consistently and reliably
achieved utilizing those technologies.
The Spol:ane River UAA recommends a comprehensive implementation plan to eontrol b4th
point anci nonpoint sources of pollutants to the Spokane River. The Spokane River UA.4 sponsors arc
committed to followiug tthis implementation plan as part of a long-tenn program io protect existing and
~ attainablc uses and achieve dowmsn-eam surface water quality standards. T1iE heart of the plan is a
5u489308.02
- ~ o-
PIZOPO56D LANGUAGF rQ[t!"4EAfDMfNT TQ VVAC 173-201A-600, Tr1}3LEG40JANA R'AC 173-201 q-o02, TAAI,E 602
cornrnitment to implemcni tec}inalogies to achieve a 95 Uereent reduciion in the point source
phosphorus laad to the Spokane Rivcr. Elements of the plan ulclude the following items:
J
0 95 percent reduction in point sourcc loading of phosnhorus: TYie Rock Creek treatment facility
on the Tualatin Rivcr in Oregon (owned and operated by Clean Water Services) has been used as a
representation of the best proven large-scale treatnient pracess technology. Results from the Rock
Creek treatment facility were uscd to e:stimate phasphorus removal f.rom Point sources. 'T`his
removal efficiency is defilled as the "next level of treahnene technology." While each point source
on the Spokane River mighi choose different treacment tcchnologies, this reference plant has been
used to set a median effluent phosphorus coucentration at 0.05 cne/L. Ifiis technology typically
provides a treatment efficiency of greater than 99 percent. The Spokane River UAA sponsors have
proposcd to implement final effluent f ltration to achieve this e.fflueni pYiosphorus concentration in
recognition of the fact that, auring much of the time, the plants will operate signi#icantly below this
coucentration. (This is documented with the Clean Water Serviees plant on the Tualatin River and
with the Upper Occoquan plant in Nortbern Virginia, which achieves 0.01 mg/L effluent
phosphorus aboui 40 percent of the time.) Because some phosphorus is currently being removcd
by secondary trcatmeni, the reduction in load to the river duc to final effluent filtration will be about 95 percent.
• Best proven technalogy. The next level of lreatment represents the best currently available,
proven teclulology for point sources t.hat will have any net enviromnental benefit an the Spokane
R.iver and Long Lake Resenroir. Improvements beyond fhis secnario reflect buman-causecl
condition.s that eatuiot be remeclied. This is consistent with the eonclusion from a very sinular
UA.A process for the Chesapeake Bay (EAA, 2003b).
•Water conservation and reuse. The Spokane River UAA sponsors bave proposed the
implementation of water conservation and reuse programs that will reducc hydraulic flow and
further reduce the pounds of phospbozus discharged dircctly to the Spokane River.
• Contributing to the control of nunpoint sources. The Spokane River UAu1 sponsors have
proposed to contribute to the control of nonpoint sotirces; which Ecology reeognizes to be the
majqr eontributor to Long Lake Reservoir DO sags (Ecology, 2004a).
• Adaptivc management stratcgy. The fecieral Clean Water Act requires that all feasible sceps be
taken to achieve the highest quality watcr attauiable. Hvwever, in watersheds where nonpoint
sources are a major contributor to pullution, feasible steps may be difficult io identify and
implement. This situation is particularly applicable to the bottom (lower h}polimnion) of Loiig
Lake Reservoir. The recouuuendation in the Spokane River UA.A requires that sources maximize
the volume of water in the lower h}palimnion to DO levels above 4.0 mg/L.. The extent to which
this volumc can be maximized depends not only on the feasible control of point aod nonpoint toads
to the reservoir, but also on potential changes in scdiment oxygen aemand ("SOD") as phosphorus
loacls decrease.
• On-the-ground implementakion. The concept of adaptive managernent as it applies to TNIDL
implementation allo«<s for on-the-ground implementation to procced where uncercainty exists
aboui how and when reduction targets will be met.
50459303.02 -11-
PRC)POSED LAI's'GUAGE FOR 1`4ENDWTTTO WAC 173-201A-600, TA73LI; 6Q0 "ND WAC 173-20IA-602, T.aE3LL' Fp2
• C'ontinuatio» of monitorirtg to ascertain water- quality iroprovements. The Spokane River
UAA sponsois have proposed to continue colleeting samples and analyzing the results of water
quality cnouitoriiig mcttiods.
• Reservroir aeration. The Spokane R.iver UAA sponsocs vave conducted an initial investigation of
aeration of Lang Lake Reservoir. Based on this initidl investigatitm, it appears thai reservoir
aeratiQn woulci provide significant benefit to DO levels in the reservoir and downstrearn water
quality. In addition, vcry preliminary estimates of potential costs associated with reservoir aeration
suDgest that it appears to be a feasible. technolog}~. Tlierefore, the Spokane River UAA sponsors
believe khat reservoir aeration sbould be fiirther uivcstigatcd.
• Work with Avista. The Spokane I2_iver U4A sponsors proposc to work with Avista to incUrporate
Federal Fnergy R.egulatory Coinmission ("FERC") considerations and conccrns and to implement
a coniprehensive worl:able solution.
Dawnstream Surface Water Quulity:
Currently, the Siate and Spolcane Tribe surface water quality standards for temperature and DO
are not consistently being met downstream of 1,anD i ake Reservoir (see Sectioil 3.4 of 1'art 2 of the
Spokane River U.4A). It is important to note here that reservoir modeling by both Ecology and
Lirnno-Tech, Inc. ("LTl") has shown that Ecology's Draft TMDL (2004e) would not meet Ecology's
o.r the Spokane Tribe's dq«7nstream DQ surf"ace water quality standarcls.
A.mending tiVashingtpn's surface water quality standards to ciesignate uses and criteria for Long
~ Lake iZeservoir consistent with the criteria recomuiended in this Spokanc River UAA would not
Cl/ exacerhate those do~vnscream problems. Modeling by LTI indicates that klle next le<<el of. treatment
combined with reasnnable control of nonpoint sources (Scenario 3; the uext level of kreatmcnt plus 25
percent rEduction in nonpoiut source loads through implemeniation of best rnanagement practices
[INLoT+25 perceni NPS i3MPs] scenario) should increase DO levels in the vicinity nf the Long Lake
Kescrvoir. T'his itnprovcment represents the higliest attainable condiiions based an feasible conta-ol of
pollutant sources. 1f other direct improvements in L,ong Lake Reservoir DO levels were implemented
(for example, aeration), it is likely that downstream criteria would be met. As noted above, the
Spol:ane 12iver UAA sponsors have conducted an initial investization of reservoir aeration. This
investiDation has shov~m that aeration appears to be feasible and should be furthcr cvaluatecl.
Ecnnc>mic Assessment (Part 4)
A.n economic assessment was completetl related to treatment alternatives proposed by the
inipleuientation plan containeci in Ecology's L7raft rNIDL (2004e) and trcatmcnt alicrnatives
recouunended in tbe lmplementation Plan of the Spokanc River UAA (Part 3). Using orcler-nf-
magnihide cost estunates; tfiis assessment is an iniiial deierrnination af the affordability of tliree
treatment alternatives. Costs are presented in this assessment only for upgradcs to the City of Spokane
("City") plant and for the cosis to build the new Spokane County ("County") regional treatmcnt plant.
References to total phosphorus ("TP") removed are for all point souree discharges io the river. The
marginal costs of phosphorus removal and DO improvement for each altemative were assessed. The
secisitivity of the City's and the County's residential sewer rates to the capital cost of each altemative
was also assessed. Other factors such as unemployment rates, local government financial capacity, and
budget strength were also assessed.
50469308.02 -12-
- PItOPOSED T.Ah~Gt1r\GL FOFL P'•'ET'DMEN'C "I'O WAC 173-201A-600,'CAPLE 600 pND WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 642
The <<lternatives evaluated «rere:
- ~
• ImplementatiUn of fiual filtration f'or point source phosphorus reduction to achieve a 95 percent ~
reduction ui total point source loading to the Spokane River
• I,and applicatiAn of municipal wa.Stewatcr ui an agricultural operation.
e Implementation of reverse osmosis (RO) technology ec> dehievc 99 percent reduction in rnunicipal
phosphorus loads.
The capital costs are shown in the following table:
City of Spokane Spokane Counfya,s
Final Land Reverse Final Land Reverse
Costs Flltratfon' Application2 Osmosis,3 Filtration Application Osmosis
Capital $57.0 million 5404.7 million $55$.7 million $108.1 miliion $161.6 million $190.9 million
Capital c.osts represEnt estimaEed expenditures by the City and County. They are not adjusied for the allocation of
costs beriveen the Cify and County for that portion of the City ReclarnaGon Plan1 thai Spokane County will pay. Footnofes:
t CH2M HILL, 2004c (Appendix E3 oi the Spokane River UAA).
2 CH2M HILL, 2004a (Appendix E'i of the Spokane River UAA).
3 CH2A4 HILL, 2004b (Appendix E2 of the Spokane River UAA).
4 HDR Engineering, Inc., 2004 (Appendix E4 of the Spokane River UAA).
5 Capital costs provided by Bruce Rawis, Spokane GQUnty Utilities Oirector. Thsse capital costs are for an ~
8 million gaHons per day (MGD) piant and include, for the land application and RO altemafives, costs ior a facility ~
plan amendment and an environmental assessment.
Household C'ost Impact:
The firsk leve] of ineasurement analy-r.ed a household's ability to pay. "niis is measured by the
annual household's sewer cost as a percentage of inedian houschold income (1vIH1) and is referred to as
the residential indicaior. Othcr measures included an examination of unemployment rates, poveriy
levels, and the financial capacity of the City and the County. lZesidentia] indicators were calculated for
the City and the County for each of the treatment alterndtives. Under EPA. guidelines, a residential
indicator of
• I,ess than 1.0 percent af MHI is considered a low financial impact
•BeNvecn 1.0 and 2.0 percent of iMHI is considered a mid-range f nancial impact
• Greater than 2.0 percent of MHI is eonsidcred a high finaneial impact
Ecology, by eomparison, defines financial hardship as when the financial indicator for aa individual
community is greater tban 1.5 percent of MHI (Eeology, 2004i).
Currently, the City and lhe County have residential indicators of 0.8 percent and 1.8 percent,
respectively. At their current levels, the existing sewer rates for the City are considered within thc
affordable range. Under Ecology's guideline (20041), the County would curreutly meet the criterioii
for fmancial hardship based on its residential indicator. ~54984308.02 -13-
PROPOSED L.AtqGUAG'L' F'C)R FnqrNDMENTTO WAC 173-201A-600, `1'ANLE 600 ANll Wf1C 173-201A-602, TABLE 602
1rnplementation of the alteinatives results in tlic f'ollowing household cosl impact based on the
~ ~residential indictor:
,
Annual Average Se+ver Bill as a PetceM of ME;l (Residential Indicator) after Implementation of Proposed Alterr►atives
a~%
312% 3,1%
34%
a.~x •
2.<x
2.45L
22° aox
x 2.0%
g i.s7e t.e~
y t.G16
1.3i6
a L<!:
~.ax - ~.ax
i.o%
0.8% ~
Oax •
ac+:
n,<%
o.2x j
ao%
Spdaana Caurrly- SFaknre Cnunry- SDOkena County- Spdone Cni.nry- Uty at Spolane- aryoi Spdone- C7ryat s~at+anr G1ry at SpaFwno- AvereDe-Q,rrent
QurreM r"ivatfon len0 App RO CLrrerri Avation land App HU
~
The City's residential indicator increases from 0.8 percent tuider current conditious to 2.4 pereent
under the land application alternative and 3.1 percent under the R.0 attemative. The County's
resiciential indicator incrcascs from 1.8 percent undcr current conditions to 2.0 percent under the land
application altemative and 2.4 percent under the RO alternative. In other Words, based on the
resicieniial indicator, ncither the City nor the Count}+ can affordably iinplement either the land
application aliernative or the RO aliemative. Further refinement of ihis assessment would not appear
to produce any different outcomes.
Efficiency of the Treatment Alternatives:
The economic assessment ewaluated the efficiency of fl-ie altematives Uased on the cost of
removing additional amounts of phosphonis for eacv h-eatment altemative. Filu-ation is expected to
remove approximatcly 95 percent of the TP at a capital cost of $165 million. Land applicaiion and Ft0
would have capital costs of $566 million and $750 million, respectively, and would remove 99 percent
af TP Crom the Spokane Rivcr.
Thc following graph illustrates the decrcasing efficiency in reducing TP beyond the 95 percent
rem4va1 level.
50489308.02 -14-
PROPOSU-Ta I.Ah°GUAGE FOR M+1L-NDA•lENT TO WAC ! 73-201A-fr00, TARLEb00 A°D VdAC 173-20I A-602; TAF3LE 602
Parcent of To;al Pnospliorous Removed from the Spokane River over Baseline Conditions
~ $900
0
$840 RO
E
~
~ $700 -
c
~ $600
m Land Application
~ $500
0
N $400
0
U
n $300
'a
~ $200 Filtration
~
c
:o $100
~
. .
Q $0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
Percent of TP Removed (kg) over Baseline
~
Note: The capital cost of the land 3pplication altemative cfluld range from $566 million io $688 million, depending on wheiher
leaching of saits would be permitfed. This assessment has used the lower range oi these estimates to demonsfrate the
impact of these capital casts on sewer rates and median household income.
A similar assessnlent was performed for itlcreasing levels of DO achievcd for each treannent
alternative. The percent improvement of DO over baseline for each altemalivc was evaluated. The
capital cost for each alternative was included to indicate the efficiency of each altemative. Foe
example, tlle metalimnion zone in Long Lake Reservoir expericnced improved levels of DO under the
filkration and land applicationlRQ altcrnatives of 1 percent and 4 percent, respectively.
`
.
50189308.02 -15-
PROPOSCD LANIGUAGE FOR Ati4ENUN9ENTTO bVAC 173-201 A-G00, TABLE600 ANll WAC 173-201A-602, TAl3LE 602
Percent Improverrtient of Dissolvett Oxyqen over 6aseline by AIternative
~ \1
$900
$800 Reverse Osmasis i:everse Osmosis
~
0 $700
~ $600 -S-Me4qfimn.lon
~y Land Apnlication Land Appiication
N $500
--6- Upper
lanver
Hypolimn:bn
U S400 LFiltration Hypollmnbn
5340
t4
U 5200
Filtration
s~ao
$o
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 SU SS 60 65 70 75 80 85 DO 95 100
Percent Improvement of DO Over
Note: The capifal cost of the land applictifion altemativo coL►Id range from $566 to $688 rnillion, depending on avhcther
leaching of salts would be pcrmitteci. This assessment has used the lower range of these estimates to demonsirale the
impact oi these capital costs on sewer raies and median household income.
The assessment of D0 improvements shows thai point source reductions beyond 95 percent
1 removal of TP do not significantly increase D0 levels in the reservoir. NOnpoint, intemal .
J recirculation, and natural sources of TP are che dominating factors rclated to existing DO levels. Even
if 100 percent of 1P removal was achieved via any of.'the proposecl aliemaiives, the Ia0 levels in ihe
reservoir would still not meet the Washington surface water quality standard of 8.0 mg/L proposed by
Ecology (2004e). In adclition, neither the land applic:ation alternative nor the RO alternative would
significantly improve the DO levels beyond filtration technolagies. It would be an ineff cient use of
public resaurces to require the City and the County to spend the additional hundreds of millions of
dollars to implement land aPplication or RO facilities while nqt achieving significant margrinal bene.fits
aver the least-cost altcrnative. ln addition, land application of effluent would likely cause a decrease in
suizuner river flows and eould Potentially recluce the D4 levels in the reservoir.
Econnniic Assessment Conclicsivns:
The followinb conclusious can be derived from the economic assessment:
• The final filtration, land application, and RO alternatives achieve nearly the salne results in DO
improvement in Long T-.ake Fteservoir, indicating that other sources (including nanpoint and natural
sources) are significant contributors to cunent levels of D0.
• The (and application and RO alternatives cost considerably more than the final filtration altemative
and place a high financial burden on the ratepayers of the City, the County, and other dischargers,
eaceeding accepted mea5ures of af.Tordabilily.
. The land application altemative is not significantly more effective in mitigaring DO, }ret it is far
' more expensive than final filtration.
50489305.02 -16-
PItOI'OSED LAiNGUAGE T'OR P'^ ENIUD4ENT TO N'AC 173-201 A-600, `1'ABLE 600 A„ND V,+AC 173-201A-602, TARLE 602
• Implementing eittier the lanci application <<lterilative or the RO a(ternative would not be an eff.ective
or efficient use of resources.
Conclusion
The Spokane Itiver UAA report demonstrates that cstablishino subcategories of uses and
criieria specific to the Spokane River, which are protective of exis[ing and attainablc uses, can be
achieved with the next level of treatment and reasonable levels of nonpoint source control. Therefore,
the SPokane River uses subcategories and criteria associated with those uses shoulcl be designatccl
through amendment of Washington's sur{ace water quality standard set forih at WAC 173-201A-600,
Table 600 and WAC 173-201. a-602; Table 602.
T'he Spokaue ll.iver UAA implementation plan is an aff'ordable plan and achieves appropriate
levels of protection of existing and affordable uses, even under the severe 2001 lnw-t:low conditians.
The plan provicies for the improvement of water quality downstrearn. Initial investigations of atratian
in the reservoir suggest diat aeration, when used in conjunction with filtration, could provide
significant benefits to the I70 levels in the reservvir and should be invesiigaicd furttier.
The current rule (WAC 173-201 A-600, Table 600 ancl WAC 173-201A-602; Table 602) does
noc do wbat it was intended to do because it does not protect actual existing or attainable uses. As set
forth in the Spokane Rivcr UAA report, without the amendment to the rule, the City and the County
will be forced to incur eeonomic hardship complying wit.ti the TlVII7L, whicb is based on a siLrface
water quality standard that protects uses that are neittier existing nor attainable.
i
50484308.02 -17.
, CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 22, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ cflnsent QX old business ❑ new businsss ❑ public hearing
informatian L-3 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENOA ITEM TITLE: Local Agency Agreement and Federal Aid Project Prospectus with the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for the Dishman-Mica Road
Rehabilitation Project
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Project, 2} approval of application
far federal grant funding for the Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Project.
BACKGROUND: Public Works recently applied for and received from SRTC a$49,440 grant
for the rehabilitation of Dishman-Mica Road between Appleway Avenue and Sprague Avenue.
~ This projec# will improve 0.09 miles of roadway by removing and replacing the existing base
material and asphalf concrete pavement.
To begin the design phase, the City must enter into a Local Agency Agreement with the
INSDOT. A Local Agency Agreement is a standard WSDOT agreement required on all projects
where federal funds are received. Once the agreement is executed Preliminary Engineering
(PE) funds can be released for the design phase of the project.
Affached is a copy of the Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospecfus that must be signed
by a city official and retumed to the WSDOT for processing and approval.
OPTIONS: 1) Approve agreement, 2) reject agreement, or 3) provide additional direction to
staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute
the Local Agency Agreemenfs (for each phase o'l the project as needed) and Project Prospectus
for the Dishman-Mica Road Rehabilitation Project.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 Street Capital Projects Fund budget includes
$7,700 for the local rnatch portion of this project. The total estimated project cost is $57,100.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capi#al Projects Engineer J Neil Kersten, Public
Works Director
ATTACHMENTS Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus
r►
Washingion State Local Agency Agreement
~ Department of Transportation
4gency Cicy of Spokane Valle}, CFDA No. 20.205
i' (CFtalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)
1"
.-,.~kddress Gl0 Aublic. Work.s Depaxtment Project No.
1] 707 E. Spra~ue A~~enue Agreement No.
Spokane Valley, WA 99206 For OSC WSDOT Use Only
7Le Loca] Agcncy having complicd, on cereby agreeing co comply, with the terms and a+ndirions sct ionh in (1) Tictc 23, U.S. Code Highways, (2) the regulations issued
putsuvit thercto, (3) Officc of tvfanagem:nt end Budgct Circulars A• 102. A47 and A•1 33, (4) the policies and proccdur:s promalgated b}, the Washington Stnte
Denarccneat of Trwisponation, tuid (5) ilie federal flid proj9ca agresmem entMrad irito benveen the Statc and Fcdcrai GovernniM retatkv to the above project, t1ie
V.'ashineton 3ta[e Deparnnent of Transportnrion will author'cze the Local Agency co proceed on the projxa by a separnu norifiretiou. Fscfcra] funds «fiicli are co be
obligut9d for tFie pro}ect enmy no.t eue9d the nrnount stiown ii:,reiu on line r, cr,lu.nn 3, withauc wriaea authoriry bp Uie 5tete, subjecc to the npproval of tbe Federal
Highµay Administratinn. All projett ccrsts not reimhuaed by the Federul Govemment sh01t be the responsibiliriI of the lAm] AeencV.
Project Description
Name 17islunan=Nlica Road lZehabilitaiion Length 0.09 miles
Termini 1 si Avenue to Spracue Avenue
Description of Work
This proje:ct ,vill improve 0.09 miles of roadway by patching/repairing and removing anc] replaeing the existing asphalt
with a minimum of 4 inches of asphalt concrete pavement. i Estimate of Funding
Type of Work t2? (3)
~ EsGmated Tota) , Estimated Agency Estlmated
Project Funds Funds Federal Funds
~ a. Aqency i 5,900.001 800.001 5,100.00
~ 86.5 ° _b_0.th.e
c. Other
Federal Afd d. State
Participalian
Ratio for P~ e. Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d 5.900.001 800.00 5,100.00
Right of Way f. A en
% Othec Cvnsultant ~
h. Other ~
Federal Aid i. Stafe
Participation
Ratio far RW Total RAN Cost Estimaie f+ +h+i
Construction k Cantract
I Other I
m. Other
n. Other
% 0. A en
Federal Aid State ~ I I
Parucipation -p -
Ratio for CN , Total CN Cosi Esfimate k+l+m+n+a+
r. Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q) g 5,900.00 1 800A0 ~ 5,100.00
Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation
5y BY
-"litle Cin1 ManaaPY _ Assistani Secretary tor Nighvrays and Local Programs
Cit}+ nf 4pnkane-Vaiiey Date Executed
DO7 Fortn 140-039 EF y
Revlsed 10hti2
Construction Method of Financing (CheckA4ethodSslected)
State Ad and Award
❑ h42thad A- Advance Paymenf - Agency Share af total construcuon cosf (bdsed an oonUact ativard)
❑ Methad 8-Withhofd from gas fax the Agencys share of total oonstructian cosf (line 4, column 2) in the amount of `
!
$ at $ per month tor months.
Local Force or Local Ad and Award
CD Mafhod C- Agency cost incurred vrith partial reimburs?ment
The Local Agency further sfipulates Ehat pursuant fo said Title 23, regulations and poliaes and procsdures, and as a
condftion to payment of the federal funds oblfgatsd, if accepts and will oomply with the applicable provisions set forth
below, Adopted by ofslcial action on
, Resolution/Ordinanoe No.
Provisions
I_ Scope of Worlc 1. Preliniinarp :atginxring
"Phe Agency shall proAde ell ihc whrl:, lebar, muterials, nnd serviccs nocessury 2• Ri8h1 of WTv atquisitian.
to perfornt thc pmja.t wdich is desGribt.d and 5=t fprth in detsil in the "Projeet 3, projxt construuion.
I)rcription" snd "T}'pe of VJOrk."
In the cvcnc that rigM of wsy acquisitican, u; ucxunl cansuvction of the roed, fnr
Whcn the Stete ects for rsnd oo bebalf of thr Agcncy, the S[nte shall be dec-med w}itch preliminury eneici9^.:rine is undercnken is not stared ln, the claaing of the tenth
an ageot of ch: Agency nnd shal prrtaim the serviccs descritred end indicuted in fiscal yenr following the fi.scal ycaa in whieh t6e aere>..ment is eacecuted, the Asency
"Type of R'ork" on the face of itiis asrcmcnt, in accordanee witti plflns and .r.~~l repn}, to the Smte the sum or sums of fcdcral funds paid tn 9};e Aeenry under the
speci5cations as },mPosecl by the Agenry and eppror-ex3 by che Statr aaatl the teTms of Uhis agrecment (ser Saction A~.
Federu] High.+•uy Adcniiiistrntion.
Whrn the Scau acts for tti~ A@ency bsit is not subject to the right of cnnvol by rn0 Agency aese~ thal oll s[aees of oonswerion neeessary ro prcavide th: inidally
the Aeency, ~9e S[nte shal] have the right tn p:rtorm the wor}: subjxi to thc Alenncd camplete facdity wittiin the limits oftlsis pmject w~ll cnnfbrm FO at least lhe
ordinnrv proa~dures of the S~atc snd Fertleru! Fli~hhw~ay Adminisuati~n. ~'alucs sci by appm~•ed statew~id: d~igE s[andwds appiic4ble to this class
of highu•ays, evcn thougti suc6 addirional werk u fuianced withaut fcdcral aid
II. Delegation of Authorfty participutiou.
The State is wiliing to fulrl] the responsibilities tn ahe Fcderal Govemment by 'Che .4eency ogrees ttLal on federe] aid higlrway constniclion projects, !he curren4
the administrutina of this project. Thc .4gcncy agxs tlnet the S[nts shall have the federel nid re gulations which aPply ro liquidaced dame~es relative tu the basis of ~
full nu4►oricy to cxrry out this administratian. The State sliall rcvicw, proccss, nnd fe3eral participarian in the project cos[ shull be applicnble in tfie event thc connac.,
approve documents requercd for Cedernl aid reimburscment in ucoordene:e with fails to complete the contract within ths contrsct time.
fecieaal requirematts, ].f thc Ststc advcrtsses and nwards tFie coatract, ihc 5rnzc VI. Payment and Partial Relmbursement
will further act faP the AaenrY iu a17 cnott:rs conccming the projcrt us requested
by tha Agency. If thc Locel ,4gency advertisrs und awards ilie projcct, thc Stste '1'he tutal cust of ttie project, inctudiog all rrvicu• and engineerine r,osu und
shnl] revrrw the wrork tn ensure coaiarmity with the approved plnns end otLer cxpcnses nf thc Stece, is to be paid by the r'1geney ¢nd by tLe Federnl
specifications. Govcmment. Fed:aal fttnding shall be in eCCOrdancs with the'Cranspartscion
Equi[y Act far t6e 21 st Ccnmry ('!"kA 21), as amended, nnd Ofrice of
III. ProJeCt Adminlstration ySanagemcnt and Budget cireulars A-102; A-87 and A-133. The Stsste shall not
Certain types of wofi; end scn•ices shnU br providecl by the 5taie oa this b= ultimntely rrsponsibke for any o€ the oosts of ihc project. The Aeen:y shull be
projcc3 as rcquesta3 by the Agency and desrribcd in the 7ype of u.'ork above. In ultimotely responsible for all cosLs essociated with thc project which ure not
nddmon, the State will furnish quslifced personnel for tti-, supervision and reimburscd by thc I'ecleral Gove.rnment. lVothine in this sgrccmrnt shell be
inspec[ion of th: Rror}; in progcss. On lacnl Aeency adve.rris.d A7td EA'H7ded construed us u promise by 1Le Stnte rs to thc amcrunt or nature of federal
projetts, the supcrvision and inspcrtion shn11 bc iimited to ensuring a!1 wortc is in PartiCipittian in t6is projeeG
canformenee with approved plaos, spxifecutiuns; and federal oid requirements. 'I'he Agency shaLl bill thc sistc for feeleral aid Project oosis incurred in canf'ormity,
The salary of su:h tnginear rir otilet suptrvisor and all other saturies und aosts w-ith applicable fadera] ond state laws. Tnz ag_ncy shal! mimimize the time elaps:+d
incurred b}' Stxte florces upon the project wil7 be considercd a cvst thcreof. AJI betwcen rcceipt of federnl oid funcls uncl subsVquent pa}'enent of incum.x.f co;t,s.
casts rclated ro c6is project incurred by employees af the Stn[e in the customary Expenditures by the Locnl Agency for me4ntenance, generil dclministration,
manner an highway payrolls ead vouchtrs ShaU tre chareed es cosu of the suPrnision, und other overhead sball not be eligible for federal perticipation unless
project. en indircct cast plan has been approved by VdSDOT.
IV. Availabiliry of Records The Stotc w[l] pay for Stste incurrsad co5ts un the projeeL FolEuwing
All projxt rxords in suppoR of a11 costs incaned and actual ezpenditures payment, the Stace shull bill the Peclenl Goverrunent far rcimbursemcnt of
kepi by ihe Agcascy are to be maintainai in srcorden:.e µ•ith tocN govemrttcnt thosc costs eligible- Cor federal pamcipation to the cxteni tha8 such cvs+s are
uccountine procedures prescriba4 by the V1'nshingtou Scatc Auditor's Office, utvibutable and properly allocable to this proje.? The Stete shal6 bill the
che U.S. Depmmmcnt of Transportatian, and the Washington Stxte Depaacment Aeency for that partion of Stau cosu whic6 were not reimbursed by the
af Transporusrion, The recurds shall be apen to inspectiDn by ilse Slate nnd Fcdernl Government (sx Sec.iion a).
Fcdcral Govemment at al7 reasoitable rimcs enc4 shaII be retainf,d and mede 1. Project Construction Costs
evailable far sucL inspection for a pcriod of not less than d►ree yenrs from thc
Cmal payma►t of r.ny lederal aid funds to the Agency. CopiG of sflid rccards F'raject cans!.-uetion fuuincing wiLl be accomplishcd by one of the chrce
shall be fumi;hed to the Stute ¢ncUar Fodcrnl Governmrnt upon rcquest. methods ns indicated in tfiis agrccmcnt.
V. Compliance with Provisions •
,
'Ihc Agency shall not incur any fedeml aid pamoipatiqn cvsts on any
clessifec¢tian of work on tLis pmject unril nuthorizxd in writing bY the 5tate for
each clnssificaciao. 'Chc clessi6catians of work for projects arc;
DOT Fortn 140-039 EF z
Revised 10102
,1lcthod :1-'C'itt Agenc}, cvill place with the Stecc, Hithin (20) days aftrr the X. Trafflc Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway
cxccution ofthe consuuction wntruct; an advnncr in the mmount ofchc Md'IntenanCe
Agency's shure uflhe totsl con;mection cosc h:ued on 8ie caiaract nward. The
5inte uill natify the ,4gency of t3►e axoct tunount to be depnsited with the Scecc. Thc Agency uriII nai peruiit un}' dtungrs to be mede in the ptovisions for pLuf:ine
?lie Siate will pa1' oll wsts incurred nnder the contrec[ uPon prcssniation of regulalinns uncl ualTic oontrnl on this pmjxt without prior approvnl uf ttie Sta1e and
~\,~imgess biilings from the convactor. Followine such payments, the State will Fedcml High«ay Administrntion. T6e Agency will not insceli or permii to be
_,~ubtnii a billitig to Uye FeQ:rsl Governmcnt forlhr federal aid pnnicipation installed anv signs, sienuls, or murkings nat in rnnfarmance sviih the standyds
share of the ccnt. tVhrn the projcct is substantiatly compleied ocid fmut actual epproved ty the Federel Highway Aciminisuation and MUTCD. 7he Agency will,
cosis of die projcct can be determined, the Scute will present the Agencp "vith a ai its o+vn cxpcnse, maintain die improvemenc coverad b}• ihis agreement,
finnl hilling sho«ing the amount due the Stnie or ilie ainaucu dae ilie Agenry.
This billing will bc cI::ued b} either 9 paymi_nt from the Agency to ilie 5tate ur XI. Indemnity
by a refund 6ocn ttie State to the Agency.
"Che Agency Shell hold the Fcderal Government nnd the State harmleas frnm and
shall process aud deCend at its nwn expense a!l aiaims, demands, or suits, whe7Ler at
tNtethod e- Thc Agency`s shate of the tn[al consuvction eost as shown on lew or equia}, brought agairst the Ag--ncy. State, or Fed.rvl Gavraw❑enL; nrising
the face of ihis ugreeaien[ shall be N•ithh.1J fram ics monthly fud teac irom the Agency's cxecutioai, parCunnunce, or failurc cn pcrfnrm any of the
eJinemcn?s. 'i'he facc of thi; agrcement establishes the moattLs in which the provisions of ihes egrer_ment, or of any other ag;reeriicnt or contraCl E:OCII]CC[Cd w7th
Htithhulcling sha[I tuke plere encl ih: ezsct umount tti be withheld each mondit. ~is agreemeot, ur urising by r=on of the rzarticipaticm ofihc State ar Federnf
The cxTent vf wichholding wili be coikfircried by letter frocn ttie Swtc ut the time (7c,vemmem in the project, PROVtDED, noiliusg herein shnll requere the .4gency to
of cantract uward. Upon receipt of pmgcss hiliing; from the conUnctor, the ~~burs; the Stflte or the Fedtril Government for damages arising out of bodily
Scate will submit such billings to the Fed:rnl Governmc.nt fnr ptiyment of its injury to pcrsons or damage to property caused by or resulting fram the sole
participaring pprtinn af such biUings. nee,)ivence nf 1h: Fedrial Govemment or the Statc.
Ntethod C- The .4gency may submit vouchcr, to the Saaie in the €ormat No liabiliry shall aaach to the 5[ate or Federal Guvercunent rxcept us .xprcssty,
~d:tf herein.
pr~cribed b1~ Itte SIDte, in dup[it;ate, not mwe thun oncc per mtmtki far thosr Pro%
coscs eligibl= for Fcdcral pwticipaaon to the c~~[:iit chat such cacts are direcdy XII. NondlSCrlminatlon ProvlSiOn
u!lributuble und propraly allo:able to t}ais project. Ezpcnditures try the l.oca! 'Che .4genc}' shall nni discriminete an the bflsis of race, Colo:, national origin, ar
Agency for mnincennnce, g:neral adminimation, supdavision, and o1h:,r sex w the a~tiard and perfarmance of uny USUOT-assisted cantracc and/or
ovencead sh,il] nai be elieible fnr Federal participation unless deimed under a agrcem-nt or in the administrapon of its DBE pro2ram or the requir^tnen[s ot 49
prcviously approved ind'usxi oost plau. CFR Pr.rt 26. The Aeency shall take np n;c;essar}• nnd reesonahle stcps under 49
'Ihe Statc shall reimburse the .Ag:ncy for 11ie Fcdsmi sliare of el igiLjle projeci CFR Pnrt 26 io rnsurc nnn+3iscriminetion in the nl'ard ond Rdmiuistratiun of
cusls u tn the eunUUnt shflwtt on the face of this a ement. At the time of USDOT-assistyd oonlrnets and uera:mrnts. The ASUO'P's I7Bl: progrem, ss
audit, the Ag:ucywi[I pro%ide do^_wnentation of aI] costs incurred on ttr$ rcquircd by 49 CFR Pah 26 and ns approved by USD07', is inzorpcrrated by
project referenca in this uereement. Implemenlacian af this rrogram is e I_gel obligation
P.nd C87lU7C t0 CSI7)' 6UI tI5 tLfR15 ShAII DC IT~P..Iit6LI ES a violarion of this aereement.
'Che Siau shall bill the Agrnc}• ior all oosts incumed by the State rclacivc to Upon *natifi,.atian to th: Agrncy of its failure to cany out its approvcti pragram, the
the projeet The 5tate shall also bi0 the Aeency fo; the federul funds paid 'o}• Department iiiay impose saactions as pcovided Ccr unde: Pert 26 and may, in
the Smte to die Agency for project costs wbicti nre subsequaudy detennined m appropriete cas=s, refer the maner for enfor°.:ement under 13 U.S.C. 100 lancUaz the
M in^.ligib6e for federnJ pamripation (sce Sectioa IX). Program Frsud CiN61 Remedies Act of 1986 (3I U.S.C. 3801 st seq.).
~~II. Audii of Federal Consultant Contracts
J Ttie Aeeocy, if servim of e consulcent are required, sball be responsible far Tbe A,eency hereby agree&s that it wiU incarporatr or cau,ve to br incoTporsced into
audii of the cansultnnt's recards co determinc tligihle fp-deral sid msts on the An}' mntrsct for constnicrion wortc, or modification [he: eof, us defm9d in the ruks
project. The rapon of snid fludit shnll 6e in the Aeency's Ciles nnd made and remletiuns oC the Serretary of labar in 41 CFR Chapacr 60, wfiich is paid for in
availabk co chz Ssaie snd the Feder-l Govcrnm:nt, whole or in pan witL funds obuiia:d from ihe FederaJ Govrmmenc or bormwrd on
the crr.dit of the Federa! Govemment pursiant to a granL contract, loaa, insuranex,
An nudit sha[I be condueted by tht NSDOT Internol Audit Offic:e in or giaaranteme or und:rstanduig pursuynt to nny federa] proerum involvine such gram,
aceordancr with generally uecepied governmrntal auditing standards as cunuact; loncy insurence, or guurantec, the rcquircd oontraet proAsions for
i;susd hy ihc United Ststcs Ceneral Axounting Officc by the Compirollet Federal-.4id Cnnuricts (F3-tWA 1273), located in Cliapter 44 of the Local Aeancy
Gtnraal of the United States; WSDOT A9anual \7 27-50, Consultant Guidelines_
Autharizarion, Sclection, 8nd Ag7ECRiGfi f1dR]It1ISlP8It0II; I11£1110f3fldfl Of ne Aeenc}, funher egrces taat it wil) bc bound by the above equsl opportunit},
understandine becwren 1A'S170T and EH1~'A; nnd Qffice c~f A4anagcmrni clause w•i9h respect [o its own empfoyrnent p:ectiees w•hen it participstcs in
ond Budget Ci;culn~ A-133. fedrrally, a,ssistrd eonscruction work: Provided, ti►at if the applicunt su
If upon r.utli4 i6 is fvund that ovcrpaymcnt or parricipation of f'ederal parti:ipating is u 5tute ar LcYCUI Governm:a9t, the abovG Cqll@I Op}1074ld011y clause
money in ine[ieihlc items af co>t ha; necurrcd, the Agrncy shall rcimburse is not applicoble to nn}' agency, insfrumentnlity, ar subdivision af such
Eh: StaEe Car the emuum of such overpayanent w excess participatfon (sce goimmnent whiCh does not patticipete in work oa or under the canuaet.
$cction Cx~.
VIII. Single Audlt Act 'Ibc Agcncy also agrecs:
Thr Agencv, Efs a subrtcipient of federa] funcis, shelt adhrre to the f€drra! (1) To assist nncl cooperaie actively with the 5mte in obmining the compliance of'
Officr ot4lanaecmen4 and Budget (OIv4f3) Circular .A-133 as weli fls flll ea►traetors ond subc:unEructors with the ec{uel crppor?ienity clause end nales,
appl icable federnl aiid state stotutes und reeulutions. A subrecipiem who reeulations, and rclcvant ardcrs of the Sccrctnry of Labor.
expends 5300:900 or mate in federal a~Nrsrds from all sflurces during e givcn (Z) Ta furnish the Sta[c such informntion ns it rnav require Cur tkie suprrvisicm of
fiscal }:a+r shali havc a single ar progrwn-specific audit performed for ilcat
} suc1~ complinnce nnd ihat it H•itl n►he~~ise assLst the Scau in the discharge of its
~+r in nccorclana u•ith ihe p.ovisions of OMA Circulaa A-133. Upon
conctusion of the A• 133 audiL the Aeency shnll be responsible for ensuring Primnry r:sponsibilitv for securine complinnce.
that a oopy of the report is transmitted promptly to the State. (3) Tn refrain from rntcring into an}' contract or contract moditication subjecc tp
Executive Order 11246 o£Sept.mb:r 24, 1965, with a conaraccor dcbarred frum, or
IX. Payment of Billing wfio has nat denionstrnted elieibili[y fur, govrrnment conascts qnd fcderallv
Tht .4eency auees that if paytinent or arransrcmrnt for pa}Rnent pf any af assisted constnrction contracu pursuant to the L~:.cuti~•a On4cr.
the S1ate's billi.ng retntive to the projec[ (e.g., Sts[e forre wnrk, ~770jCCI
cwicellation; overpayment, eost inetigbl: Cor CeQeml partieipa[ion, etc_) is noi (a) To carry out su:h sanctioa; and penalues fa: vinletinn af thc equa)
~-,.iade to the Staic vdthin 45 days af[er [he Ageu_ry has been billad, the State oppnrtunit}• clause u; may be emposrd upon contractors and su6eontracmrs b}, the
~ iall c~'c a reimbursemcnt of thc total sum du: from ~c rcgular monttily fijcl State, Fe~leral Highwu}~ Adminisvation, or the Socretary of l.t~bor pursuxuu [o Pan
allatments tu the Aeency fiom the Ma4or Vehic]t Fund. No eddicinnal ll., subpart D of the Eaezzutiva Ord.r.
Fsderei prajcct fimding «•ill bc approved unril full paymeac is rc^.ei~-ei unless
otherwi;e directe.d the r155isEenE Sec7ctarv for liigh,,va}'s and ]ocal 1'rtrgrsmS,
DOT Form ➢ .0-038 EF 3
Revised 10r02
ln addirion, cne Agency eerces tliat if it fails ar refuses to comply wich these XV. Venue for Claims and/or Causes of Action
undertukings, the Statc may tgkc any or all of the foUoN•ine= acUOns: For the convenience of the pariies to this contrucL it is ugrerd tkilt am• claims
(a) Cancel, terrniiwte, or stispcnd ihis agrcement in w•hole or in part; andlor causes of action which the Loc.al Agcn:y hAS sgsinst the Stau of
1~'eshin~non; grvH•ing uut uf this ewitra:~l ur die prc~jett with w9iict~ it is
(b) Refiain from extending en}' fiirtticr assistancc to the .4~ent?~ undcr the cwlocmod, shall he hraught nnly in the Superior Court faa Thursmn (;ounty.
progracn u'iilh resp:ct to whieh the failure ar r.fusal oceurred until sntisfnetory •
vssurancc o: futurc complinnc: has o.en reeeived frorii the ngency; and XVI. Certificatfon Regarding the Restrictions of the Use ,
(c) Ftefer die Case to the []cQnrtmcnt ofJustice for appropriate legul proceeduigs. Of Federdl FUndS f0r LObbylflg
The uppraving authoriry certifies, to the besi ofhis on cer Iaiowledge and belief;
char.
XIII. Liquidated Damages
(I) No fecleml appmpriated funcEs hxve been paid ar u•ilJ bc paid, by or on behalf
'll,n Agcncy herebY agrees ibea tlu liquidatcd demnges pro%tisions of 23 CFR of the undersipnqd, to nny p:rson Cor infiuevcing or attempting to influence an
Fatt 635, Stibpart 127, as supplcmenied, rclativt to the Funount of Federal offiCer ar cmploycc of any federal agrncy, a memher qf Cnngfcss, an offtoer or
par#icipatian in the project co5t, shall be appiicable in the evrnt the cnntractnr emplnyee of Congrcss, or on employee af a member of Congress in oonnection with
fnils co complece the conua.8 within thc eantract time. Failure to ittclude the Quarding af any federal cpntracY, the mttking of any federal grnnt, the ma4:ing of
liquicfatext detnuges provision wi0 not relievc the Ageney from reducticsn of any 1'6deru] loun, tkie tntericig intb oFcury oouparative agreern:ayt, und the extension,
federel participation in eccordanar w9t}7 lhf5 paFIIg7HP}1. 00[ILIIIl13L61i; IfCICR'3L, emeodment, or modificntioo of anp fed.ral con[ract, grazn,
XIV. Termination for Public Convenience lflsn, Or coopera[ive agreemen?
Thc Sccretary of the Wa.shington Stnte Depamnenc of Traasporcndon niay (2) If °t'y tunds ottitr Lhan fed:ral appropriatad funds Lnve been paic! ar wiCl be
tern3inutc the conva-c-t in wliole, or from timc to dme in psin, whencvcr: paid ro any pcrson for inHamcing or ancmpting ro influcncc an officer or ernptoyee
of nnp ftdranl ageacy, u mecnber of Coneress, nn bfTicer trr employe: ofCangess,
(1) The reyuisi[e federal fimding becomes unsvailablc thrvugh failure a€ or an emplo}rr_ of a memhcr nf Cangcss in ocmnccrean urith t.his fedarnl cantrnct,
appropriatinn or othenwise, gr¢nt, lcr,uf, or coaperutive agreement, the undersiened sFuill complete and ;uhmit
(2) Thc conuacmr is p7evented from prnceedine with the work ns a diw-t the Standard Faim - LI.L, "I}i;closurc Form ro R:pon Lobtr}vig," in aceurdance
resulc of un Executive Order of the I'residcot aith respccc co the prosecurion af w~~ its instructians.
war or in t3tc interGSt of napnnal defen.sc, ar nn Executive Order af the (3) The undersigned shall requirP thac the languagc of this ccrtificarian be
President or Governor of ctie S[nie with respxt ta the presrmtion of'cnrrg,y included in clre aHwd documesu for ull subawards ut nll tiers (ineluding subgranu,
resvtirccs. and cpntracis and subcantracts undcr grants, suhgrsnts, lonns, and coopartirive
(3) The convecror i; prevenccd from Proceeding with th uereecnea~[s) wLicl~ cxceed 5100,000, tuid chat all su:h subrecipients sha!l t4rtify
: wark by rerssun of and clisclosc accardingly,
a prcliminary, special, or permaneot r:straining ordar of o court of competeac
jurisdiction where the Lsunax of sucb arder is primarily raused by the eccs or Tyis cerrification is n cnaterial rePres:n[ntion of fect uP°n which reliencr_ wes
omissions of persoas or agcnci:s other than the contractor. plnxd wh^n this transnction wss mfldc or enterod into. Submission of this
ccrtificatian as a,prercquisitc for ma}:ing or entering into thiS trnnsttctian imposed
by Section 1352, 7'ide 31, U.S. Gc~de. My persoa who fnas to file the raquircd
(4) Thc S~ccretsry drtermincs t6nE su~:h terminBEibn iS u[ the 6eSl inlfrfStS Uf ccctificstinn shell br subjeat to a civil penalry of nnt 6r;; tha.n $10,000 and nUi more
the $tate. than S 100.000 for each sucU fnilw^r_
Additional Provisions
<
:
DOT Form 140A39 EF 4
Revised i OA?"t
AMAk Washington State Local A9ency Federal Aid
MAP Department of Transportation Project Prospectus
Prefix Route ~
Federal Aid
Project Number STPUS 4041 Fate 7/22/2005
Local Agency WSDOT LFederal Employer
:~rojecl Number SR TC04-S (Use Only) x ID Number 71-0914170
Agsncy Federal ?rogram i itie
City of Spokane V31Jey 0 20.205 ❑ 20.209 Q Offier
Projeci Title Staif Latitude N Siari Lonoitude W
Dishman-vlica Road Rehabilitation
End Latitude End Longftude W
?rojecf Termini From To
lst Avcnue Spraoue Avenue
From: To: Length of Praject Award Type
7.39 7.48 0.09 m.iles (K Local ❑ Local Foroes ❑ Staie ❑ Railroad
Fedsral Agency City Numaer C4unty Number Caunty Name WSOOT Region
0 FHINk ❑ Ofhers 1223 32 Spokave EAST
Congressional District Legislative Distrfcts Urban Area Numbet TMA! MPO 1 RTPO
5 4 2 SR7'C
Total Local Agency Federal Funds Phase Start
Phase Estlmated Cost Funding Date
Neares4 F:undred Doltar Neares4 Nundred DoIlar (Nearest Hundred aollar) Montn Year
P.E. $5;900 $800 S5,100 1/05
RIVV $0 $0 $0
Const, $51,200 $6,900 $44,300 06I05
Total S57,100 $7,700 $49;400
DeSCri tion of EXistin FaCill (Existing Design and Present Condition)
Roadway WidEh Number ol' Lanss
40 ;
lai;hman-Mica Road betv,•een lst Avenue and Spraguc Avenue is a three-lane, principal arterial in the City of Spokane Valley's
road system that carries approximately 13,400 vehicles per day. The current stnletural condition of Dishn.ian-Mica Road
bctween lst Avenue and SpraSue Avenue is failed, wich a pavement surface condition rating of 29 based on che WSDOT racing
methods and a remaining life of 9 years bascd on non-desuvctive test:ing. 1"his project has severe ruttine and flushing, along
Hith some brcak-up of the pavement including alligatoring and crackine of tUe asphalt.
Descri tion of Proposed Work
Roadway VVidlh Number of Lanes
❑ Nevr Construction (9 3-R ❑ 2-R 40 ;
This project propases to improve 0.09 miles of roadwa), by patchinOrepairing and removing 8: replacing the existivg asphait
wit6 a rninimurn of 4 inches af asphalt concreie pavement.
Local Ayency Contact Person TiBe Phone
Steve M. Worley, PF. Senior Engineer (C1P) 921-1000
Mailing Address Ciiy State Zip Cade
11707 E. Sprague Avenus Spokane Va[ley VJA 99206
,
~
$y
ApprcNfaa Pratessional Engineer
Design Approval
Title Senior Canital Projects Engineer Date
oor Fom, 140-101 E: Page 1 of 3 ■ Supersedes Previous Editions ■
Rc%,ised 12J2002
ABency ProjeG i itle Date
City of Spokane VaUcy llishman-Mica Road Rehabilitaiion 2/22/2005
Geometric Design Data
Description Throu h Route Crossroad
O Principal Arterial p Principal Arterial
Federal ~ Urban 0 Minor Arterial ~ 0 Minor Arterial
❑ Collector Urban O CoQector
Functional
❑ Najor Collector ❑ Major C411ector
C lassification ❑ RUfaI ❑ Minar Collector D RUf81 ❑M►nor Collecior
O Access StreeVRaad ❑ Access Street/Road
TeRain 19 Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountain ~ ❑ Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountaln
Posted Speed 35
Design Speed N/A
Existinq ADT 19578
Desi n Year ADT N/A ~
Design Year NIA
Design Fiourl Volume DHV) N!A
Accident - 3 Year Experience
Property ln'u Accidents Fatal Accidents
Total Number
Year Damage Number of Number of Number of Number of of Acadenfs
Accidents Accidents Injuries Accadents Fatalities
Pertormance of Work i'
Preliminary Englneering Wi11 8e PerFormed Sy Others Agency
Ciey of Spokane Valley % 100 %
Construction Will 6e Pertormed By Contract Agency
Conlractor 100 % %
Environmental Classification N Final ❑ Preliminary
❑ Class I- Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 0 Class II - Categoricafly Excluded (CE)
❑ Project Involves NEPAlSEPA SecNon 404 ❑ Projects Requlring Documentation
Interagency Agreement (Documented CE)
❑ Class III - Environmental Assessment {EA}
❑ Project Invotves NEPAlSEPA Section 404
Interagency Agreement
Environmental Conslderations
4 7
DOT Form 140-t0i EF Page 2 of 3 Ravlsed i 2I220a2
,4gancy Prajed 7itle I Dale
City of Spokane Valley DisHman-M..ica :Koad Rehabilitation ~ 2J22/2005
Right of Way
.1
~ No Right oi Way Required ❑ Right of Way Required
~ All oonstruction required by the 1
contract can be accomplist~ed ❑ No i~elocation Relocatian Required
within the existing right of way. I
Description of Utllity 32elocation or Aojustmen#s snd Ecisting Major Structures Involvea [n the Project
FAA Involvement
Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project? ❑ Yes N No
Rem3r9cs
This project has been reviewed by the leflislativ2 body of the administration agency or agencies, or it's designee, and is
nat inconsistent with the agsncy's comprehensive plan for community development.
Agency City of Spokarie Valley
Date By
M..=yarfChairpnrson
DOT Form 140-i01 EF Page 3 of 3
Revised 5212002
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 22, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: consent (9 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Local Agency Agreement and Federal Aid Project Prospectus with the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for the Broadway Avenue Overlay
Project.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N!A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project, 2} approval of application for
federal grant funding for the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project.
BACKGROUNO: Public V1lorks recently applied for and received from SRTC a$703,000 grant
for the rehabilitation of Broadway Avenue betvveen Bates Road and Sullivan Road. This project
will improve 2.46 miles of roadway by grinding and overlaying the road with 2 inches of asphalt
~
concrete pavement. This project will maintain the current four lane configuration.
To begin the design phase, the City must enter into a Local Agency Agreement with the
WSDOT. A Local Agency Agreement is a standard WSDOT agreement required on all projects
where federal funds are received. Once the agreement is executed Preliminary Engineering
(PE) funds can be released for the design phase of the project.
Attached is a copy of the Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus that must be signed
by a city official and returned to the WSDOT for processing and approval.
OPTIONS: 1) Approve agreement, 2) reject agreement, or 3) provide addrtional direction to
staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute
the Local Agency Agreements (for each phase of the project as needed) and Project Prospectus
for the Broadway Avenue Overlay Project.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 Street Capital Projects Fund budget includes
$109,700 for the local match portion of this project. The total estimated project cost is
$812,700.
' STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer / Neil Kersten, Public
Worlcs Director ATTACHMENTS Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus
Amok
~ Washington State Local Agency Agreement
~ Department of Transportation
Agency City of Spokane Valley CFDA No. 20.205
~ ) (Catalog of Fedoral Domestic Assistance)
Address C10 I'ublic Works Department Project No. _
I] 707 E. Sprague Avenue Agreement No.
Spokane Valley, WA 99206 For OSC WSOOT Use Only
'I'6c Local Ageatcy having complied, ar herehy ngrceing to cemply, with t6e terms and aonditions set fnrth in (1) Title 23, U.S. Ccx1r Highways, (2) che reguluiinns issued
puisuant tLereto, (3) Oflicc of Mnnagcmeni vid Budget Cinulsrs A-llY2, A-97 and A-133, (4) the policics and procedures promulgatccl by the Washington Stntc
Dep:uunent uf Transportation, and (5) iht fedraal ;iid prujex;t agreement entcrcd into bcnvccn the Statc and Federal Guvernmtnt, rdativc to the above pmject, the
Washington Stnle Illepartmsnt of'TianspOrlation wilJ tiul}iorvx the I.ocal Agcncy to procccd on the prol:ct by a sep=te notificalion, Fccicrnl funds which an tn be
obligutecl ffir the pmjcct may not exceed Qic amounl sliuvm herein an linc r, cnJumn 3, wit.hotN writlen autlia•iry by Uie Stntc, suhjcer to the approval uf the Fcc4ernl
Niehwxiy Adminisirntion, All project costs not re.imburscYl by the Federnl Govemmcro shall be the responsibility uf Ihe Lncal Agency.
Project Description
Name Braadway Avenue 4verlay Length 2•46 miles
Terminf Bates Roacl lo Sullivan f'toad
Description of Work
I his project will impeove 2.46 miles of roachway by grinding and overlaying the rpad with 2 inches of asphalt concrcte
pavement. Crack sealing, pavement removal replacement and correc2ion of drainaDe problems are additpnal items that
are part of the scope of this overlay project.
Estimate of Funding
Type of Work (2) (3)
Estimated Total Estimated Agency Estimated
~ Project Funds Funds Federa! Funds
COE a.Agen_cy 62,500.00 8,400.00 54,100.00
86'5 % b.Other
c. Other
Federal Aid d. Stete
Partiapati.on
f2atio for pE e. Total PE Cost Estimate a+b+c+d 62,500.00 8,400.00 54,100.00
Right of Way f_Rgency ~
% Qther Consultant
h. Other
Federal Aid J. St2te
PaRicipa8on
RaUo for RW _ Total R/W Cost Estimate f+ +h+i
Construction k. Contract
1. Other
m. Other
n. Other
% o. A c
9=enY
Federal A6d _p. State
Parliapation
RatioforGN . Total CN Cost Estimate k+l+m+n+o+
r. Total Project Cost Estlmate e+'+ 1 62,500.001 8,400.001 54,100.00
Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation
; y sv
,
,
'i'itle 0yLMangoer Assistant Secretary for hiighways and Lopl Programs
0Cy_QL4pnkane_V_all ev Date Executed
~
pOY Forrn 140-039 EF
Construction Method of Financing (Check Mathod Selected)
State Ad and Award
❑Methad A- Advance Payment - kgency Share of total constructian cost (based on contract award) -
.
❑ Methai B- Withhflid from gas tax the Agency's share of total construcfion cast (fine 4, column 2) in the amount af
$ at S per month for months.
Local Force or Local Ad and Award
~ Mefhod C- Agency cast incurred with parfial reimbursement
The Lacal Agency fuRher stipulates that pursuant to said Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a
condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply with the applicable provisions set forth
below. Adopted by official action on
, Resotution/Orclinance No.
Provisions
1. Scope of Work 1. F'rcliminary enginaerin5.
'I'hc Agensy shatl provide nll Uta wutk, labor, matsriafs, and services necessary 2, itight af way acquisitiun.
to perfonti the projoct which is descrihed and set forth in detail in the °Project 3. F'ruject wnstnectiori.
Iacscripdon" and "Type uf Work-"
In the cvcnt tiwt right of wsy acqui;irion, qr actunl constniction of tho road, far
Whcn the Stute acLs for und un beliulf oCdie Agptcy, tfic 3ta[c ahnll bc deamnf µ.hic6 prrliminary c;vgineering is undertal:en is not stnrted by the elosing of ilie tevcki
rin ugent of'dt$ Agcaecy and shall pxxfortn the snrviccs drscribec! :uid iudicated in rscal ycar following the fscal ytar in H~hich the agrcemznt is ex~ccuted, the Agcncy
"'Pype of 41ar6" on Uie fnce of thu agirocmenr, in acmrdence with plans und will repay tu ttie Stace tlle sum or suijis of federal funds paid to the Agency under the
specifxalions ns pmposcd by the AyRency and apprvved by Ilie Slnte und the ccrms of this ogreement (see Srxtcon lX).
Federal HighNVy AdminisUatioo.
~Vhra~ the S~nte nets fur the Agency but is nar subject tn the right nf cnn~rul by The Agcncy ngrocs thnt ell stagcs of constmction roccessary tn provedc the inirislly
die Agency, the St1tc shall hq~~c the right tn Srerfrmn the HWrk subject to the planned compla[e C¢cility wittiin Qie limi[s oCttiis project wCl.l cunfurrn to ut least the
c►rciinary proceclures of U~e St~te and Fedeml Highwa}' Adminiscrntinn, rnuiimum valueS sct hy ep,pro~'CCI StAfCWIdC !~C$ISq S187ltIAr(IS 8P~1IICflDIC f0 1l115 CI7R45
ot'highways, even thuugh such ndditinnal work is fiwnced witliuue faderul aid
II. Delegation of Authority parcicipac;on.
The Slute is cvilling to fiilfill the responsibiliiies to the Fecicral Govenunent by 7'tie Aeency n@raes that on federal aid higLway construction projects, the curmnt
the administmtion af chis pmjact Thz Ageoey a,rees dhat the Stnte shnll have the federa] aid rcgulateons wfiich eppiy to liquiclated damn.gt:s rclative b the basis of
full nuthority to earry out tliis adminiS[rucion.l'hc State shall review, pruezss, mld 1'«tcml psrticinutiou in the projeet cxost shol) be upplicable in (lie event the cuntrae'
approve documwts rcquircd for fcderal aid reimburseanent ui aocordattoe wiih fuds to complete the contrect within the oontrcct tune.
federnl requiremenrs. IIILe 5tate ndvertiscs and awartls the contract, the Stete VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement
will Curlher act for the Agcncy in all maUers cancrming the projeet tts roqucsicd
Fiy the Agency_ If Uie L.ucul Agency ndvrrtises and nwards the puojeot, the Smte 'I'he todal oost of thc pmjcc[, inciuding nl I rcvicw• and cnginccring oosts nnd
sLull review the wor1: to cn,aurc aonfprmit}, with the npproved p1arts and oihcr cxPenses nf the Suste, is W be paid by 11ve Agene}' und by Ute Fedenil
snccifrcations. Guvercunent. Fodcrnl firoding shall hc in accorclnnce w•ith thc'fransportndon
Equily Act for Ihe 21st Cenwry [I'LA 21), tu tuneodcxl, mid Oflice of
III. Project Administration MnnageatEnt anci Bud$ct circutars A-102. A-87 and A-133.'I'hc SGatc shnll rxu
Certain types of wrorY and senicas shsll bc providr.d Isy the Stute ai tHis be ultimatcly revpwnsible fnr uny of the wsts of lhe prujec;t. 7Tec Apr.ncy slinll be
projoct as rcqutsteif by the Agency encl cle:scrtbed in the Typc of Woii: ttbovr. In ultimatsly respoosiblo for nll oosts associutal cviih ths projocl whioh are not
addirion, the Stute .vil.l furciish qualified pmrsonncl for the supervision end reimbursed by the FecEcral Goveraaoeot. Nothing in ihis agrecmeot shall be
inspectioa of the wori: in Progress. On Local Aeency ndvertised and actiarcl«d uonstroed ns a promise by [he State as to the nmouut or nature of federal
projecLS, the supcrvisi+m and inspeation shs11 be limited to ensuring all woric is in PArticiparinn in this projoct_
contbrmnnce with upprvved pluns, Spacificatinns, am1 fcclcml aid rcquircments_ 7'ryc Agency shnll bill the siste for CectartJ nid projxt costs incurrcd in confnrmit}•
'Clte snlary of s+ech cnginoar or other suPervuur and a[I other sataries a.nd costs with np.plirzible fodernl nnd state 13ws. T'Ne ngency shall mimim ize the time elnpsed
incurred by State forocs upon the projcct will be considrsed o cnst tlierwf. All beaWeen rcceipt uf federnl aid futtds und subse:queait puyment of incurrel Cusls.
rnsts relatnd tu this project incurred by erttployoes of the StAtc in the custnmary Expeaditurcs tr}, the Lacal Agrncy for maintrnancc, general adminisiradon,
maniier on highway paiyTnlls and vouchc7s shall be c1wrgred as custs of the supervisiun, uod atLer overhead shall not be eligible fur Czdesul partecipalion unFess
projec:i nn indirccf oost plan has heen approved try WSUO'['.
IV. Ava118blllty Of ReCOrds The. Smte will pay far Stnte incurred costs on Qie project Polluwing
AD projcct records in support uf ulJ costs incurred nnd acninl exPcndinircs pa}'mcnt, the Stute shsll bill the Pedr.ral Ocwernment &x reimbunemenl nf
6;ept by Uts Ageney are to bc maintained in scctudance with Icmal guvernment those costs eligible for fademl puirticipntion to Uic extcnt thnt such cascs ere
. accoanring procodures prescribe8 b}• the Washing[oa Stnte AuditoPs Offioc, amibtitable nnd properly nllcicablc ta this projxt_ "f'he State shnll 6i11 the
the U.S. Deparu»ent of Tttuisponation, and the VVashingion State 1)epartment Agency for t1hat portioti of Stnte costs which were not rimDursed by the
bf TrEUtsportatian. T6s rvcords shnll be qpcn m inspection by the S Wte und Fede►al Govemmcnt (soc Scctioai IX).
Fcclcral Governmrnt nf atl rrasonuble limes nnd sLnll be retaincd ancl madc Project (;onstnieteon Cactc
available for such inspeC[eon for a period of nat Itss thnn thrx yrars from the
finnl pay►ueni ofnny fedcral aid funds ro thr Agency. Copirs af said reeurds I'raject construction tumneuig witl be ufloomplished by one of Qie three
shaU be fitrnishsd to the Suitc snclfor Feclenil Governmeait upon requcst, melhods as uidica[cd in Wis agreemcnt.
V. Compliance with Provisions
~
Ttie Agency shnll not incur any fodeml aid particiPntion ctrsts an nny
clnssificnriom of wor}: on diis project un[il authorized in Nvriring by the Statc for '
each cEtissiTcatioa. 71te classifiqttions of work fbr pmjcccs are:
I'1f1T Fnrm 14f14119 FF
Met6cril A-'ihe Agency will pdstc w•ith Aec State, witliin (20) days atler the X. Traffic Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway
execution of'the constructinn conrracl, an atdvunCe in the omounl of tiie Maintenance
A3cncy's sIian of Ure lutfll a+nstructonn cosl bnsed on the contrnct a«-ard. T'hc
`Stute will ncitify lhe Agenry of thc cxact xmount to hc dcpi}sirpd with the State. The Ageni:y will nu1 perrnii nnq chunges to bc mndc in tPoc provisians f'ur purking
/I C1lLr Stute vvill puy till ccsts incurrc:d undcr the contrxt iipon prcsenltAion of reguln[iuw uncl ttvfFiC ivntrul un tltiis pmjecl wittout prior ngpt'oval ol'tlie Slute nrcd
`,,,a`aro~;ress billings from the ountrauuc rnlluwing such payments, the State will F~xicrnl Hish~+~ay Adminisrrntion. The Agea~cy ~vill not iostnll or pemlit to hc
submit n billing tn the Fcdcrnt Cinvcmmcnt f'ar tl►e federal aed participation installed uny siens; sienals, a► markingS nqt in Cp71fOfI11900C wlth 1118 SWII(I:uTLS
sliare of djc cost. Wheai die projw is substuntialty campleted and final ectusl appravcxi by the Fedrml Highwlny AdminisUalio+t uud MU7'C.U. `I'hr Agency will,
c(isls of the prtojxi uin be detcrminod, thc State will preseni the AgencV with a et i~s cnvn e.rpense, maintnin the improvrment mvcrcd hy this agreement_
final billin6 sliuwing tht nmount due the State ar the amount due the Agency,
'fhis hilling will tx: cleared hy citNer a pa}'ment Giim the Ageney W the Slnte or XI. Indemnlty
by a refwcd frurn tha SL3tr U) d►r Agency.
'1'hc Agcncy shall hold ths 1=cdcrol Govenunenl nnd the Slolr harmlcss fram nnd
shaU prncess uncl cirfend af its own expertse nll elaims, demands, or suils, whellir.r u9
Methad B - 7'tre Agency's share of the tolnl construction ca.Sl ns sFmwn on Ipw or equity hronghi against the Agency, 3tate, or Pederal Covemmeat, Fuising
the face af thu agreement shall hc wiihhclai from its monthly fitcl tax Gum die Agencv s ecetutiun, perfarmunce, or failurc ro prrFcrm any uf the
nllc~tmcnis. Thc facc of this agreentrau eslnblishe3 Uie iiinnths in ~vhidh lhr provisiqn; o1'this agecment, or of any other ageentent or eontruct rnnnactted with
withJinlding sliell take pluce nnd the eacec.i nmount to Ac withhcld eaeh month. Uiis agre>ement, or arising b}' teasun of Ihe panicipstian nf the State iir FodCral
'fhe estcnt of withholding will be eonfiemed by letler frwn [tie State nt die ucne Crov,crnmcnt in the Gsrojcet. PKUV[pED, noihing herei.n Shull reyuire the Agnncy to
uf cwntruclawsrd. Upon rcxeipt of prosress billings 1mm the contrxetpr,llie reimburse the Stace or dte Pederul Guvarnrntnt for domugrr arising out c+f hodily
3tete will suMmit suc71 billieigs to ilte Pedaral duvenunent Cur Ryment of its injury to persons or damngc to }+roperty caused Dy or te3ultino Crom the solv
Psrticipating portinn ol'sach billing,;, neglibence uf the rectervl Government or the Stste.
~Itet6url C- 71ie Agency maysubmit voachcrs to tfic Stoic in the iormat No lisbility shall ansch ip the Statc or Fcdcral Govemmea►t evcept as exprrssty
prescribcd hy the Stnio, in duplicate, not more tlrwi arice per montti Cor tlwse Provided liereui.
cosls elinible i'or I'edeml psniciPation to the cxtent thni such caSts arc diroctly XII. Nondiscrimination Provision
attributable and propcrty nllocable to th is project. Ezpeeidicures by ttie l.ucal The Agenry sliall not discrimina[s on ttce basis of ruce, cnlor, nntional origin, or
Agency f'or mnintenanoc, general 3dministrnpon, supenision, nnd nther sea in the uwarcl and perfcumunee of sny USDC7T-35sisted contract andlor
overliead shall uol be eligible for Federal participaticai unless ctaime<f unJer u tigreettueut or in the administratiua of iIS DaG prugrnm ur the requircmcnts qf 49
prcviousty apProved inJircct ctut plan, CHFt Psrt 26. 'fhe Agency shnll mke nU neccssary and rqisonable steps uudet 49
The Stute stall reimburse Ure Aeenc}• Ru the Federal share of cligihle pmjcct CFR Pnn 26 to easure nondisciiruuiatiun un Qte awnrd nnd udministrution of
costs up ro tfie arnouni shown on the fnce of ttiis agreeruent. At Uie time of USDO"1'-nssisted cnntrucu nnd ngreements. '1'hc 1ti SpU'T"s DBE program, as
uudil, the Apenty will pmvide JncumeNntinti of flll costs ineurrccl on ifie required by 49 CFR Parc 26 3nd as apprc»ti by USDOT, is incorpnrat«i try
project rcfercncc in thic agrcement. Implemcntatioa of tltis Fttogram is a legal ubligalion
wid fniJure N curry uut iIS terms shall be trcated us a veolntian qf this aSrccmcnt.
Tlie SWte slmll bill Uie A;;ency for all costs incurred try the $tate n:lative io Upon notiiia{tion cn the Agency of iis fa7ure to carry uut its uppraved progrzim, the
the projexl. 'lh: State shnll also bill the Agency for the federa] fwids paid by t)rparrment mny impcre stinctions as prmridecl for under Par12G and niay, in
the Stute m the Aeens,-y Qar pmject casts which arc sutroqucn[iy dc.termincd to uppropriate cases, refer the matte.r Cor eait'orcement under 18 U.S.C. I f101 and/or tlic
/-`-'~e irieligible far Cederal participatiun (sCe Secliun la). prognm I-nud Civil itcmcdiss Ace of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.).
Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts
"Ihe Agenty, if servicrs of s amsultant arc roqttirctl, shall tx responsihlc for 'I'he ASency hereby agraes Ihat it will incoTpnratc or cause ta M incorporated into
audit of dis consuhnnl's recar[Is to tletermine e7ieible I'ederal nicl wsts on Qir Lut}' conUne[ for cotLstruction worl', or mcxjiGantion tharnuf, as derned in the ruFes
rymject. `I'he report nf snict nudic shall tu in thc Agcncy's tilcs ancl madc and n;gulsticros of thc Sccrctary of I. abqr in A 1 C1~R Chnptcr G0, whicU is ~~aid Cbt in
nvailaDle to the 5taie ond die Pederal Gowanment wFioFa or in part wiW fuuds oblained Gum the I'ec1e1n1 Goverciment or hartowed on
the crudit of the Federal Covcmment pursuant to a grnnt, coatmct, likw, insurunce,
An audit shall be cuacluLtec1 by tL- WSDG"1' lntemal Audit Uffice in or gunmntte or uncicrstanding pursuant to atiY federal progmm invalving such grnnt,
nceard3nce with gcncrally accepted governmental auditing stancinnds as wnuact, loan, insurancz, or gunrantee, the rcquired cantrnct ptovisiotu fat
issued by Uie United SWtes General Acccrunting U!'fice by the Compcrolkr Foderal-Aid Contracts (MXVA 1273), loea[ed 61 Ctiupter 44 af the l.ocaJ .Agency
(icncrnl c,f'thc Uniccd Sintes: WSDOT Manua] M 27-50. CoiLsultan[ Cuidelines.
Auihorizarion, 5clcccian, and Agrezmen( Administntian; memunuids of The Agenc}, fuHher ugrer3 lhut it will be hound try the ahvvc cqt4ii opportuniry
uttclentunding bexwcen ~1'til~C)7' and FH WA; nad 011icc ot' Manngcmcnl .
c~.nd Budge1 CirculorA-133. clausc H~ith r~pcct to its own cm~~loymant prt~ctices wheii it panc~ipates in
Cetlemlly assistecl constnretion u•ork: t'mvictod, that if the applictint so
If upan nudit it is fOund thnt overpnymr.nt or pnrticipntion of fcdcr3l participnting is a Statc or l.ocal Govcrrimcrit, Ute abave equiil opportunity cluuse
money in ineligible items of cast hfu occurred, the rlgcncy shall reimbarse is no2 applicable to any aeencye instrwnentality, or subdivisitwi of such
the 3[ntc for the amount of such overpaytneat ur esoess p:uticipativn (sta gnvernment which does not psrlicipate in w-ork on or ureder the conlract.
Sec:lion 1X)_
VIII. SinglQ Aud'It ACt 7lie Agency ulsu uerees:
'fhc Agcacy, as a subrccipicnt uf federdl tmads, stuLll aJhere w dir feJertal (1) "I'o tssist and opoparate activcly with tfic Suite in obtaiuing tlte campliunce qf
Offic:e uf tMunagemanl anJ Eiuc[get (Oh913) Circulnr A-133 a,s wcll as nll a+ntrnetors and subcontractcirs with the equal oppurWnity cluu.ce snd rules,
aippliuible fecleral ancl sune sronites nnd regulations. A subreeipient wNu regulateUns, und relevunt orders o1'the Scxretary qf I,tthor.
expcnds $300,000 or more in feder~l awards from ull soarccs durine n eiven
fs~l year sltufl Lave t~ sinele ar pro~lnm-spacif~c audit pcrt'~rmed for thnt (2) ~1'o furnish the Smte s~ech infnrniation as it ntny i+equiie for the su{~enision of
ycnr in accorctanoe with the provisions o1~OMB CirCUlat A-133. Upo~t such complinncc and tht+t it will othenvise assist the Sl:ite in the diszhargc of'i4s
c;onelusion oC the A-133 audit, the Agcncy shsll tx re.sponsibJc for ensaring Pnmary resFxmsibilitp far sccuring compliance.
that a copy of the repoit is Uynsmitted pttunpdy tn the Stntr. (3) To refa►in fraiji entering inln any onntruct or onnrrnct niodificatoon subjetl to
Excctdivc Urdcr 11246 of ScplcmUer 24, 1965, wilh o CulttrdcEor debamctl frOm, or
IX. Payment of Billing whn has not demnnstratcd digibility tor, governmeau coa►tracts nnei fcYfemJly
'Il►c Agcncy agm that if payment or urrajtgenteN Cur payment of uny of assisted cuatsUUCiiom Wntruets pursuunt to tho F:acccativc Utder.
tht Stute's bi0ing rclntive to the projcct (c.g., Statc toroc work, project
~r-ancelintioq overpuyment, cost inelioible for federnl pxrticipatian, ccc.) is nol (4) 'ro rum' out such sanctians tutd penalties fw viotatiinn of th- cqunl
wde co the 5tate w•ithin 45 days afte.r the Ageney has bexn billecl, the Suate opPorninity clausc as rtuiy be iroposod upaii cantracturs and suhcontrnctors by the
~!hnll cffccl reimbursement ot'ihc total sum due froni tlee regular rnonthJy fuel Smte, recleral Highway Administrntitm, or the Setxetary of Labor pursuant tn 3'sn
tnx alfo[rneuls to Qie I\guncy Gum tlie Moror Vrhiclr l-und, No aclditiona] Tl, subpurt D of Qie: Exetutive: Order.
Fcderel praject fimding will be apptoyad umil full puymem is received unless
uUtanvise c[ireUed the r155istant SccrMary fitt Hishwnys and !„oeal Progrsnu.
OOT Farm 140-039 EF „
In addition, the Ageney ugretx tlm[ if it fnils of rcfuses to cumpiy wIlh (hcsc XV. Venue for Claims andfor Causcs of Action
undertaking.s, ihe Stnte mny tn1:e any or ull of dtt fNlowing aetions: For ihe ecmvenience of the parties to this eontrnei, it is ageed that any Claims
(a) Cuncel, terminnrc, ar saspcnd this agrue:mtal in wholc or in part; an&w causes of:ection w•hich tht I.ocul Agency hns ngniiist tkir. Stu[e of
Washinetun; growing out of thi; contraci or thc pmjcct wiili which it is
(b) Rzfrnin frnm exleatding any 1ijrthcr nssistnncr to the Agency undcr ihc euawernpl. shall bc hmught only in the Superiur Cuurl for Thurstum Cnunty. ~
pmgucn wit6 mspoct to whech the fui]ure ar refusal oocumctl until wtisf•uclory l%
assurnnce of future compiionoc hn;s bern reoeivcd Guttt Uie Agcncy; and XVI. Certification Regarding the Restrictions of the Use
(e) Refcr thc crtsc to the Drpwtment of Jusoce for appropriate legsl proeecdungs. of Federdl Funds for Lobbying
7'he upproving aulhotity ocrtifics, to thc bcsl of his ar her knowledge and helief,
thnt:
XIII. Llquidated Damages Nu feclxnil appropriated funds havc been paid of w-ip tac paid, hy or on tuchalf
77Le Agency hcreby agrees that tlie liyuida[ed damagss Pravisions of 23 CrR Of the undersigreaJ, to oiV person ftu infltcencing ur utteaipting tu inlluenoe an
Part 635, Subparl 127, as supplsmented, relulive to ttie atnount of Fcdcrnl O('fcer or employee o1'nny fedcral agency, e memhcr qf Congress, An n. tlicer or
pnrticipation in ttie project oust, shall ba opplicablc in [he event (he wnlraet[n crnl)Mvec of Gmgress, cu un Gmpkiyee of u member of Coqgmss in uonnectiun with
fnils ta wmptcte the coatract within the ccmuact time. Feilure to include the awartling of aiiy federal contract, thc maki ng of nny federal IIrnnt, the makinb of
l"equidated damages prvvuiun will not relievo the Agcne}• fmm reductioo of any fcdcml loan, the entering into of any cooperutive ugrt,entent, end ttie extension,
fcderal participation in accardantx aith this paragntph. continuntinn, renewnl, uruendment, or m4dificntion ofany fcderal conaact, grnnt,
XIV. Termination for Public ConveniEnce luan, or ooopcrarivc agmcmcne.
'Clie Secrcriiry of the 1Vashington Stme I)epnrtnicnt orTranspwrtuteun meV (2) uan}' funcl5 othet than 1'etlcrnl appmpriflted funds havT bcen pnid or will he
umsinale the c:on[r,iG in whnle, or frcFm time ro time in pnft, whcnsvcr; pnid to any pcrson fcu influencing, ur ettemPting tu in.fluence an officxx or emplcryec
of any fcxiern] ugency, a meinber ofCoogress, nn ofiiser or cmployee of Cotigiws,
(1) The requisite fexlertiJ funding bacomcs unsve;ianle,hrougl, ruaure of ar wt etttpEoycc of'a mcmbcr of Congress in cnnnaction with this fcdcral ct>ntract,
uppnupriation or oihcrwisc, gnnt, tnan, ar couperutive ngreemcait_ tlje widersigiied sUalt cornplete vid submit
(2) 71ie canmer,tor is pmvrnted from prmeading 4vith the wrorl; as a direct Uie Stnndard Form - I.I.[,., "I?isdasure Form tq Report 1.o66}in,,r.," in accordnnce
rcsult of an Gxeeutive Order of ttis Presidcnt with respxt to the prosecutifln of wi[It ILS liLS[rttCllb[LS.
~,var ar in the imercst o1'nutional defense, or an Executive Order 0, i'the (3) 'Che unclersignecl shull reyuire lhat tlie luaiguuge of Utis ceni[icution be
Prrsedent ur GovernUr ol'the Stflte with respcet to the prrseamtiou of enrrg}' IIICIILdO(I Itl U18 3R'3fd dOCUf11Cflt$ f0r 3lI $1!I)9N'ArdF RL 1II pGl'S (U1CII.1dlllg SIln$mO(S,
resow'ces, ond vontracts and subcontmcts unclrr gmnts, subgrunls, luans, tLnct waperutive
(3) The convucior is prevenied from proceeding witii the worl; by rekson af n6reeanents) whic6 execcd 5100,000. and that ell such sjbrecipicnts shall ecrtify
a rclimin ond disclosc Pax~rdinn~ly.
p ary, spxial, or peimaiient restraining ordca afa co~urt of competeut TT~ ~~cation is ~ matcrinl rcrnti~n of fact uhich roliance wu.a
juristliction wherc the issuance oi'such order is primarily caused by ttoc acts ar Presrn pan u•
omissiinns of perscrns or ugrncies other ttian ttie oontractor, plaeed when this truncuclion was ntade or en[ered into. Submission of this
certificutioo as a prerequisito for making or cntcrfng intx> this tr9rrsnction imposcd
by 5oction 1352, Tittr 31, IJ.S. Cocle_ Any persoai wlw fails to file the reyuirecJ
(Q) 7'he Secrelory deteroiines that sixh tcrminaticm Es in the best interests of certiGcuteua s7►all be subject to o civil penahy of nioc Fcss than $10,000 and not more
thr State.. Utwi S100.000 for cnch such faiture.
Additional Provisions
`
nnT e- ,4r%Alo Fc .
~ Washington State Local Agency Federal Aid
v7AF Department of Transportation Project Prospectus
Prefix Rou1s
Federal Aid
pra9ect Number STPLI'S 3846 Fo T 2/22/2005
L4cal Agency SRTC04-~ ! WSDO y\ [Federal Employer 71-0914170
PrQ ect Number Use Onl x ID Numpar
Agency Federal Program TifIQ
City of Spokanc Valley N 20.205 ❑ 20.209 ❑ Ofner
Project Tifte Start La4itude N Start ! ongitu~e W
Boradtitiay Avenue Overlay
End l.atitudQ N End l.ongitude W
Projed Termini From To
T3ates Avenue Sullivan Avenue
From: To: Lsngth oi Pro}ect Award Type
4.58 7.04 2.46 miles 0 Local ❑ Local Forces ❑ Staie ❑ Railroad
Federal Agency Ciry Number Counti Number County Pfame WSaOT Region
0 FHINA ❑ 4thers 1223 32 Spokanc L-'A5'T
Cangrassional Disirict Legislative DistriLts Urban Area Number TMA / MP01 RTPO
5 4 2 SRTC
Total Locat Agency Phase Start
Phase Estimated Cost Funding Federal Funds Date
(Nearest Hundred Dollar) Nearss# Hundreo Dollar Nearest hundred Dollar Month Year
P.E. $62,500 $8,440 $541100 2105
R1\N $0 $0 s0
Const. $750,240 $1.01,300 $648,900 7/05
Total $812,700 S109,700 $703,000
DeSCri tion of Existing FaCllity (Existing Design and Present Condition)
Raadway Width Number of Lanes
44 4
Broadway Avenue between Mile Post 4.55 and SuUivan Road is a four-lane, principal ar[erial in the City of Spol:ane Valle}rs
raad syscem that carries approximately 17,200 velvcles per day. Tlie current structiiral condition of Braadway Avenue between
the Bates Raacl and Sullivan Road is fair, wittt a paverneni surface condition raling of 66 base•d on [he WSDOT racine rnethocis
and x rcmainin' life of 16 ycars based on non-desmictive testing. T'here are munerous areas of lonEi~idinal cracl:ing, patchine
and allieator crac}:ine_ There is also raveling of the asphal4 joints the entue lenath of the roadway. In addition to the above
roblems, there is low w6asl ath flushing and ruttine in this section oCroadwav.
Descri tion of Pro osed Work
Roadway Width NuTber of Lanes
❑Netiv ConstrucGfln 0 3-R ❑ 2-R 44 q
This project proposes tp improve 2.46 miles of roadway by grind'u1g and overlaying the road with 2 inches of asphalt concrete
pavement.. Crack sealinE, pavement removal & replacement and c.orrection of drainage problems are additianal items that are
part of thc scope of this overlay project.
Local Agency Contac! Person l-dle Phone
Steve M. Worley, PE Senior Eneineer (CIP) 921-1000
Mailing riddress City Stafe Zip Code
] 17p7 E. Spraguc .Avcnue Spol:ane Valley WA 99206
By
Design Approval APProvin Pro.essional Er~gineer
Title Senior Gapital Projec[s Engineer Qate
DOT iarm 740-191 EF Page 1 of 3 ■ Supersedes Previous Editions ■
itevised 1212402
Agency Pro}eck i itie Qate
Cit}, of Spokane Valley Boradway Avenue OverJay 2r12J2005
~
Geometric Design Data
Descripfion 'i'hrough Route ~d Crossroad
❑ Principal Arterial O Principal Arterial
Federal ~ Urban 0 MinorArterial ~ Urban El MinorArterial
❑ Colkector ❑ Collector
F u nctional ❑ Major Collector ❑ hAajor Collector
Classification ❑ Rural ❑ Minor Collector ❑ Rural 0 Minor Collector
O Access Street/Road ❑ Access StreeURoad
Terrain B Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountain El Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountain
Posted Speed 3$
Design Speed N./A
Existing ADT 10710
Design Year ADT N/A ~
Desi n Year NJA
Design Hourly Volume (DHV) r'IA ~
Accident - 3 Year Experience '
Inj~ Accidents Fatal Accidents PfOp~~' Total Number
Year Damage Number of Number of Number of Number oi ofi Accidents
Accidents Accidents Injuries Accidents Fatalities
Performance of Work
Preliminary Engineering Will Be Performed 8y Othees Agency
City of Spokane Valley % l 00 %
Cansiruction Will Se Performed By Contract figency
Contractor lOQ % %
Environmental Classification
0 Final ❑ Preliminary
❑ Cla:ss I- EnvironmPntal Impact Statement (EIS) ~ Class A- Categarically Excluded (CE)
❑ Project Irsvolves NERA/SEPA Sectlfln 404 ❑ Projects Requir9ng DocUmentafion
Interagency Agreement (Documented CE)
❑ Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA)
❑ Project Invoives NEPA/SEPA Sectfon 404
Interagency Agreement
Environmenial Considerations
00T Form 140•101 Er Page 2 of 3
ReviSCC ',2J2062
Agency Ptoject Tifte Date
City of Spokane Vafley ~ Boradway Avenue OverlaV 2l22t2005
~e Right of Way
~ No Right of LNay Required ❑ Right of Way Required
` All construction required by the
contract can be accomplished ❑ No Relocation ❑ Relocation Required
within dhe existing right of way.
Deacription of Utiiify Relacation or Adjusiments and Existing Major Struciures Involveo in the Projact
FAA Involvement ,
Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed project? ❑ Yes N Mo
Rema rks
This project has been reviewed by tfne legislative body oz the administra#ion agency or agencies, or it's designee, and is
not inconsistent with the agency's comprehensive plan for communi#y development.
Agency City nf Spokane Valley
Date By
I.SayorlGhairperson
i
DOT Form 140•101 EF Page 3 af 3
Revised 1212002
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
.
J Meeting Date: February 22, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: CJ consent 0 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
El information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Local Agency Agreement and Federal Aid Project Prospectus wifh the
Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) for the Appleway Avenue
Reconstruction Projecf.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project, 2) approval of application for
federal grant funding for the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project.
BACKGROUND: : Public Works recently applied for and received from SRTC a$2,764,928
grant for the reconstruction of Appleway Avenue from Tschirley Road to Hodges Road. This
proposed project is intended to rec4ns#ruct the existing principal arterial to a five lane urban
section. This project completes the gap that currently exists between the recent urban
improvernents along Sprague Avenue to the west and Appleway Avenue to the east. Curb,
gutter, sidewalks and bike lanes will alsfl be constructed.
To begin the design phase, the City must enter into a Local Agency Agreement with the
WSDOT. A Local Agency Agreement is a standard WSDOT agreement required on all projects
where federal funds are received. Once the agreement is executed Preliminary Engineering
(PE) funds can be released for the design phase of the project.
Attached is a copy of the Local Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus that must be signed
by a city official and returned to the WSDOT for processing and approval.
OPTIONS; 1) Approve agreemenf, 2) reject agreement, or 3) provide additiona) direction to
staff. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute
the Local Agency Agreements (for each phase of the project as needed) and Project Prospectus
for the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2005 Street Capital Projects Fund budget includes
$26,100 for the local match portian of preliminary engineering for this project. The remaining
local match for this project vdill be included in the 2006 budget. The total estirnated project cost
is $3,197,000. .
STAFF CONTACT; Steve Wor9ey, Senior Capital Projects Engineer / Ngil Kersten, Public
Works Direc#or
ATTACHMENTS Local Agency Agreernent and Project Prospsctus
AlMik
Washington State Local Agency Agreement
MAP Department of Transportation
Agency City of Spokane Valley CFDA No. 20.205
Qkddress (Cetalog of Federal Domestic Assistance)
C/O f'ublic Works 17epartrnent Project No.
117Q7 E. Sprague Avenue Agreement No.
Spokane Valley; WA 99206 For OSC WSDOT Use Only
The Local Ageau}, having complied, or hereby agreeing to comply, ait6 the terms and conditions set forth in (1) Titic 23, U.S. Codc Highwwys, (2) the regutarions issued
pursuant [hereto, (3) Offiee of Manngeinent aud Budget C'vculws A-102, A-87 nnd A-133, (4) the policics and procedurcs promulgaeed try the Wsshing[on Stata
0.partmr.nt uf Trnnsportatinq und (5) the fedsi-aJ uid project ngreeanent ecitcred uuo benveen the Stoce and Fed-ral Govemmem, rcEniivc to the abovc projec[, the
Wusningtnn Stute I?epw9ment oCTranspontition wilJ ou@iorize ctie L.ocal Ageney ro proceed on ilie pmject My a scparntc ootiticPtion. Fcdcrnl iunds wfiich ore to be
ohli,ated for the proj:c.t me?, not exc;eed the amuunt shown herein un line r, coluaui 3, wi[tiout ,~tiTrcen authority by the Scate, suhjcct co the approval of die Fetleral
Fligtiway.Administradon. .4U projsxe eost5 not reimbursed tr}, the Fcaierul Govemment s6a116e the responsibility of the Loeal Aeency.
Project Description
Name Applewav Avenue Reconstruction Length 1.25 miles
Termini Tschirley Roact co Hodges R.oad
Description of Work
This proposed project is inCended to reconstruct the existing principal arterial to a five lane urban section. This project
compietes the gap that currendy exists between the recent urban improvemenis along Sprague Avenue to the west and
Appleway Avenue to the east. Curb, gutfer, sidewal.ks and bike lanes will also be constructed.
Estimate of Funding
Type of Work (2) (3)
Esfimated Total ~ Estimated Agency Estimated
~I Prfl'ect Funds ~ Funds Federal Funds
r?E a• Aqengy ~ 193,000.00' 26;100.00;1 166,900.00
86.5 ~
% b Othe,~ ~
c. OEher
Federal Aid A. Siate
Pariicipstian
Ratio ior PE e. Total PE Cost Estlmate a+bfc+d 193,000.00 26.100.001 166,900.00
Right of Way f. A en ~
% er Consultant ~
h. Other
Federal Aid 'I. St~te
Partici{~ation
Ratio for RW Total R/W Cost Esiimate ff +h+i
Constructlon k. Contract
1. Other
m, Ofher
n. Other
% o. A9°ngY
Federal Aid P_ State
Participadion _
Ratio for CN , Total CN Cqst Estimate k+I+m+n+o+
r. Total Project Cost Estimate (e+j+q) , 193,000.009 26,100.001 166,900.00
Agency Official Washington State Department of Transportation
By BY
-''Citle CjpManager Assistant Secretary far HigMvays and ! ocal Programs
Citv_oLSpnkane_V_allr_y Date Executed
DOT Forrn 140-039 EF ~
RevEsed 10102
Construction Method of Financing (CheckM'ethodSerecred)
State Ad and Award
❑ h4ethod A- Advancs Payment - Agency Share oi tatal construclion cost (based on conicaci award)
❑ Method B- Nrfhhold from gas tax the Agency's share o( tofa9 consfruction cost (line 4, column 2) in the amount of . ,
$ at S per month for months. Local Force or Local Ad and Award
~ Method C- Agency cosf incurred vrith partial reimbursement
The Local Agency further stipulates that pursuant to seid Title 23, regulations and policies and procedures, and as a
condition to payment of the federal funds obligated, it accepts and will comply vrith the applicable provisions set forth
below. Adopted by official action on
, Resolution/Ordfnance No.
Provisions
1. Scope of Work 1. Preliminary enginoeaine.
The Agcncy shall provide ul] the wrork, lebor, materiaIs, and s:rvices necessary 2. Right of way acquisioan.
w p:afortn the project w•hich is described and set forth in detad in Itie "Project 3. Frojecc constniction.
Dcscription" and "Type of Work."
In the tvent that right of way eoquisirion, o; uciual coasttuCtion of the road, for
«'hcn the Stnte ects for and on bchalf of the Agency, the 3tate shall be dermed w,hich pteluninary engincsine is undeatekeu is aot started by the ekosine of the ten[h
an egent of the Agency end shall perCnrm the seniccs dcscribed snc4 indicated io j"uCBI }'CA7 fOIlDwing the fiscal yeat in which the er,raement is executed, the Agency
°Type of ~Vot#c" on the fuce. of tLis o~cr_menE, in uccortlan:~ witEt pIAnS Rnd µ~ill rep:iy to tbe Statc the sum vr sums of fcaderal funds paid to the Agcncy under the
sPecificaticrns us proposad by the Agency and approved by the Statc end the terutc of'this agreemmt (see S.r;iion A).
redereJ Highway Adminestrution.
R'hen the St~tc sc~s for the Agency but is not subject to the riKht of con~ol b}' IhL Ag:17C1' agPCCS IbBI flII St&gC5 Of COI15VtICF10ri nCCeSStlli~ to proNide tl~c initieUy
Y subjxc to the Plnnned complcce facilicy W7►hir the limits of this projcct wili conform to at ]eest the
the Agcncy, the Stnte shall Nave the right m perCarcn the wor
ordinurv procedures of the Stace and Fed:.ral Highway AdminLstration. minimum values set by approved statcwidc design standurds applic ebie to chis clrtss
af high' Ke1V5, even ihough such ac~ditional work is ftnanced without ~cdcJal a9d
II. Delegation of Authority participatinn.
TL: State i; willing to fulfill the rcs}+ansibilides tn the Federnl Govemment by 'fhc AgenLy agees Ihnt on federa] oid highway construetion projects, tbe eun-ent
the ddninislretiUn oil this project. The Ag:acy egtces thai the State shnLl Lave the ftclP.,ml aid regulations which eppl}, tv liquidaced daujiages relxtive m the besis o1'
full authority to cum out this edmini.scration. The State s6all rcvicw, process, and fedcisl participauon in the projccc cosa shall be applic;a6le in the eveat the oontme"spprove doGUments required for federnl vd reimbursement in accordonce with fflils to complctc the anntracc w•ithin the ooatrtjct rime.
fsderal rcquirements. If the Slnte odvcrn'ses and nwards the convact, the Scace VI. Payment and Partial Reimbursement ~
uill furihr.r uct for the Agency in all mauers conccm i:ng the pmject us request9d
by the Agency. [f the Lacal Agecicy advcrti;es and ewurcls the prUject., the 5tete T6e total east Of tbc prOjCC:, includine nIl review and enginccring oosas and
;hall review the woifc to cnsure oonformity µ'ith the approvcd Phan.s ancl oiher cxpcn.ses of the S1nte, is to be pnid by the Agenzy end by the Federal
SPecificatiQas Crovemment. Federe] funding shall b•_ in eeccndauee witli the Transportnrion
Equiry Ast for the 21st Century (TEA 21), es emendcd, snd Offi.e of
III. ProjeCt Admini5tfdtion Management and Budeet circulars A-102, A-87 and A-133. The 5tate shnll not
Cea[aua rypes of w•rark end services shall bc provided by the 5tate on this bc uttimately rrsponsiblc for any of the costs uf the prajecc. Thc Agency shall be
projecc as requestad hy the Agcncy and drscribeci in the Tyne of Work nbove. lo ultimolely rtsponsihle fnr all cosFS 4ssociated with the projeci witi,h ure aot
uddiiion, the State MII Cumish qua]ified personnal far the supcrv•ision erid reunbuTSOd by the Fcderul Ocrveramenc. Noahing in this ageomant skull be
inspection of che w+ork in progress. On E,aca! Agency advenised and Aw•arded coa►struad us a promise by the Scstc as to chr. Euno•un4 or notu.rc of fsdern]
proje:u, the supenision and inspecxion shul] be liniited to ensuaing aU wnrk is in partieipateon in thi5 projecL
canformnnce witli epproved plans, spccifications, nnd federel aid requiremenu. 'rhc ,Agency shell bill the state for fedcral aid prajxi cosu encurred in conformity
T'he srilary of such eneineer ar othict supcrvisor and a11 ather salaries and costs with applitabkc fede7sl and stute laws. The agcncy shall mimimiu th:. eime elapsed
incuTred by SWte [orces upon the projxt will be considerod a cacst therebC AR bctwcen rxeipt of fedcrni aid funds and subsequeot pnyinent of incumad co:cs.
costs refated to this project incurred hy emPloyees of the Stere in the customury ExPcoditures hy tiie Locul Ageiicy for maintcnancr_, geneznl uclmiuisunlion,
munner on highway payTOUs anct vauc6ees slnnll be chazgec4 as cosLs of Ure supervisioo, and orher overheud shulJ noc be eligibte for fcdersl p.articipadon unless
pTOjsct. an indira.t cost plnn hrs b7'n appmvcd by WSL)OT.
IV. Availability of Records i'hc Stau witl pey for State incurred costs on the project. Tollowing
All project records in support of edl cnsts incurred and actusl expenditures pa}'ment, the State shn(I bill the Fodcral Govemmens for reirnbut5ament of
kept lry the Ageascy nrc to bc maintuined in ac:ordxnce xith laai government thase costs rligible for fcderal pnrticipRtion m th: exleait iliat s¢ch costs arc
accuuntine procedures prr-sar'btd by the Was6ington Stute Audimr's Qftioc, stcributabie alid properiy eUocable tn this prajeet The 5taic shali bill the
the U.S. Depnrtment of Trunsporwtion, and the Wsshington Stace Dcpamnent Agency for that portion a1' State costs w6i-c1i were not rcimbursed Er}, the
ofTranspnrtation. The reconis shall be open to inspecdon by the Stute end federal Gvvemment (see Section llc.
Faderal Gavernm:at at aU reasonahle cimes and shall be rcteined and made 1, project Canstruc[ion Costs
availnble for such insprction for o period of not less than [hree _years from the
final psymcnt o!' eny federal aid fimds to the rlgeacy. Copies of seid recvrds Projec[ conswerion financing wiU b: aceornptis6ed by onc of the thrn
shaJl be fumislied [o the 5tats ancL'or rerleral Govcmment upon request. eneiliods as indicaRed in this aereement
V. Compliance with Provfsions
The AgencV sltall noi in.ur any faderal aid participatinn costs on nuy 'ciassificntion of wro:rk on this project until auihoricect in %vriting by the Siste far
each clrusificatiun. The classifications of work Cor prajects are:
• flOT FOrm 140-039 =F 2
Revisea IcJaz
X1et6od a - 'Che .4een.y «•itl place with th: Smm, within (20) dm afler th:. X. Traffie Control, Signing, Marking, and Roadway
• esccution ofthe conssrucxion convnct, an advancc in the amount ofthe M3lntenenC@
Agcncy`s shsrc of the totnl canstnection rnst hased on [dc canaacl awarcl. '1'he
Swte will trotify Ute Ageucy of tti: exact flmount to bc depasi[ed aith [hc Smta The Agancy will nnt pcrmit uny chnnges in br mude in the provisions for parkins
5 i-'he State µ•i!t pn~~ all costs incwre~c4 undrr the cvntrucl upon presentn[ion of regul3tians and trnffic onntml an this project wiihoat prior approti~el nf the Staic and
rogress billin~.s from the concractor. Fqil~w•ing such rayments, ihe Stute w711 Federal HighKrey Adininisvaoon. The Agen^y urill not inst9ll ot perniit to be
~ubmit a billing to the Fed^.rvl Guveriuneji[ for the federnl aid participation instatled nny signs, signuls; or murkings not in conlurmance «•ith ttia swndnrds
sharc of the s(~st. VJh.n the project is substanti511y aompleled Fuad finoi aciual apKsrovcd b}, the Fcdcra! Hishway .4dministrsdan and \4iJ'I"CD. The Aeenc}' will,
costs of the projeci csn be dctcrniincd, 3he $tate w-ill pttsent the Aeency witki n nt its oHro expense, maintain the impravcmem covered by this eF,rc_mcnt,
final hilling chowing the emount du= ti2e State ar the amount clue [kie AeencY.
T'his bi[ling Htil! be r.lewed by eittiea a paVinenc 6nm the Ageacy to the State or XI. Indemnlty
by n refund Gom tlie State co the Agency.
7'he Aeencv shall hold the Federal Governm=nt and the Statc harmless fmm and
sbsll process and defend at i1s mm expe7ise a[I clauns, dernntids, or suits, wheUier nt
, J4elhod B- The AgeaEqy's share of the total construcdon cost as shnKm on lew or aquit}, 6ruugL[ agoinst ihe .A$ency, Scace, or Fccler,t Govemment, arising
ihc f,:cr_ of Uhis ngrcemeni shall be wilhhelrJ frwn its munthly fue7 tna from ihc .4genc}•'s exeoulion, ptrf'ormarice, Ur failure to perfurm uny of tkie
allounents. 17te fece of dhis agreemcnt esrabiishcs the monchs in which the Provisions aj this agreement or of any o1hcr egrermcnt or contrszi rnnncctetl uith
witlihoiding shnll tal:e place and the raact amuunt to be wiLliheld ea,^.h month. Ehis 8grecmcnt, vr arising by reason af the p;uticipation uf tkie State or Fecieial
7'he extent oCwit6holding will be Confimied bp Icncr from the State at th: Lime Govcrncnent ia the projec4 PROVWFD, nothing hcrein shstl require the Agcnry to
of cootra:a award. Upon receipt of progress 6llings frum the eonrractor, the reiniburse it►e 5tnu or the Federal Govemment tdr damaees arisine out of bodily
State will submit su; h billicigs co die Fed:rsl Govcmment for paynent of its injury tu persuns or datnoge to ptaperty caused by or rcsutcing from the snle
panicipatiug partion afsach billing.s. ciegligenee of the Fedcral Gavemment crr the Staee.
iN7ckhod C-'Che Aecncy mny submit vouchers to the State in the fom►at No linbiliry shall attach to the State or Fedrrel Gavernment ezcept as rapressly
Pi-oprese:ibed b}' the Stcte, in dupli~tc, no3 more than once per monlh far thase vidcd hcrein.
eosU eligiblc for Federal participetion to the eztent thnt suc5 costs arc d'vcccly XII. NondlsCrlmination Provision
atuibuta6lc and p:opcrly ollncable [o t6is pro}vct. Expendinrrr, hy eh: l.ocal The Agcnc}• shall nat dis;.riminete on the basis of rur:, colur, national origin, ar
AgCncy for mointenance, gco:rai administrnticnn, supervisioa, and oilier ycx in the auard ancl perforanance of any USDOT-assisted contract nndlor
overh^_ad shalE nai br eligible fnr redernl purticipati0n unless zlaimcd under a o~ement ur in the admini;tratian of its ll13E proIIam or tho requiremetits of'44
PfCVI01ltiI}, approved iudirect cost plan, CFR Part 26. Th: Agrncy shnLl uil:e all nerrssary and reasonable steps uuder 49
7tie Sc;iu shall r+eimbuc5e the Agency for the Federnl shere o1'cligible projmt GFR Fert 26 to ensurc nondiscriminadan in the awerd and adaninistration of
easts up co the amount showrti on the fec: af this ogreeinent. At the timc of USDOT-essisced concracts iuad eleemea►[s. The Vl'SDOT's DBE program, as
audit, uec Agency N•ill provide doCUmentaDOn of aU cnst; incurred on the required by 49 CFR Pnrt 26 flnd as appror•ed by USI)07', is incomorated iry
referencc in this agrcemcnt Implr.mentntion of this prugrem is a legal oblig,ation
p'~°~~~ and failur: to caury uut its terins shall bc trcstcd es a%ialarion of this a,,rrer_ment.
7'hc State shaJl bill the .4gen:y far ull eosu incurred by the Stafc rclntive tn Upon noti6cspan tn the Agency of iu failure [o cam, out irs epproved program, die
tho pmj:et. The Stut: shtill ulso b[l] tlie Agency for the fLderal funds puid b}' Deputment muv impose stutctions as pmvidei for und-r }'art 26 and may, in
the State to the Agency for projsxt costs Wrfiith ar: subsequently det.miined ro apprapriate cascs, rcfer the man.r far cnforcemem under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/ar the
~e incligible for f:cfeml pucicipauon (see Section DK). Program Fraud Civi] Remediss Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. 3601 ec seq.).
~ JII. Audit of Federal Consultant Contracts
The Agency, if servio:a of a cansultani arc roquired, shuLl be respansible for Th= Agrncy hereby, aere°..s thet it wiU incorpomic or cau5e to be intiorparated into
atcdie of the eansulrant's recards w determiue eligible fcderal aid eo,ts on the anY eoittract for consuuction wro76:, or moclificntion thereaf, us defined in the rules
nrojh:a. 'I'he repart of said audit sh211 be in the Agenc}•'s files and made and rcguladons nf the Secretnry of Labor in 41 CFR Chaptcr 60, which is paid for in
availabM to the 5tntc and the Federel GavemmeoL whole or in part vvitb fimds obtainnd from the Fecl.ral Government ar borrowed on
c6c credit of the Foderal Govcmment pursuant to a grant, eonanet, ]amn, insontnce,
An eudit shall be conduc[ad b}, tlie VvSD07 [ntcmal Auslit Office in Or guerFUStc: nr understand'utg putsuant to an}' fetcrnl program imvKing ;uc.h gnnt,
accoMancx Mth genereU}, acceptcd governmmtal audidng scandards as coutmct, loan, insurancc, or gusrantee, the reyuired contrac[ provisions for
issued by the Un.ited Stats Genernl Accoaendng pffice b}, the Comptruller f edeaal-Aid Cantracts (PHVdA 1273), locatrd 'tn Chnpicr 44 of the I.ocal Agcncy
Gen.ral of the UniudStut:s; WSDOT Mnnual M 27-50, Consuttnni Guidelincs,
Authorrintion, Selection, aiid Agrecmrnt Administration; m:annrnnda of The A cn furthca a es that it will be bound by the ebove eQual oPportunt~
understanding hcn+~ern WSCJOT snd FH1X'A; and Office of ~tnnagcmcnc ~ '
nnd Fiudeet Circutar A-133. elnuse Htith respect to i[s ow~n cmplo}~nene preccia:s v~~hen it perticipatrs in
- f9dern0y assistcd constructinn worl:: Provided, thnt it[he applicant so
!f uron oudit it is found that overpayment or participt+tion of federal participuting is a State w Locn] Govemment the above equsl opportunity clau.se
mancy in incligible items nf rost hus oaeursa3, t3ie Agenc}, shal] rcimbaFrsc is nnt upplicuble to any ageucy, instnimcntnlity, or subdivision of such
the Smte fur Itie amou nt of such overRaayment or exccss partecipation (see governmeiit which docs not parcic.ip¢ta in work aati or under the controat.
Sccdon IX).
VIII. Single Audlt Aet Tne Ag:ncy aLso agees:
Ths Agcncy, es a subrccipient uf fedr:tnl fiufds, shfll] 3dhcrc ta the federaJ (1) To nssis[ and cooperntc n_tivcly u•ith the Scate in obtaining the cnmptiance of
OtTice of Management and Audget (0.\414) Circular A-133 us we[I os nll oantraccors and sub.ontracturs with the equal opportunity clause and rules,
applicable foderil und stnte statutes and regutntionc, ,4 subrccipirnt who re.gu]ntions, and r`levani ordus of the Seerctary of f,ahor.
expeods g300,000 ar more en fedcasl awurcls fiacn nli sourees during a Siti-cn (2) To fumish ct~s 5tate such info7►netion ns ic m~~ roquirc for the supm~i;inn of
fiscal }~ear shall hn~~e a single or progrnm-spccifi~ audis p:rfo:m:d tor tkmc strch eomplianu and th:it it wi11 other.vise nssist the Scate ui che dischnrge of its
year in aorordancc uith the Prnvisions af 01vfB Cincutnr A•133. Upon ~,ri~. Rsponsibility for securing complianx.
conclusion of the A-! 33 eudic, the Aeency shall be responsible foa cnsuring
that e copy of the rspan is aansmittecl promptty cu the State. (3) 'I'o refraiu fi'om eutering into any enntrect or contraet mqdiAcatinn subjeec tq
ExeCUtive Ordcr 1 1246 nf September 24, 1965, w-ith a iAnLactar deburrad fram, ar
IX. Payment of Billing w•ho hns not demonscruted eligibility for, goveinmeiit contrscts ond federaliy
77ie Agcncy agrms that if payRnant or arrangenent for paymcot of any af ussist3d eonstructimi coavncts purs+tant to ihc I:asaltive Qrder,
the State's billing relative to the projeci (e.g., 5taic force work, project
cancellatien, overpaymeni, cosi ineligible fw federal participation, ett.) is not (4) To ctury ort such santtions and p:nalties far viatation of the equel
nede to the 5utte Hitttin 45 da}., aPer the Agenry has been hi]]ed, the S[ate oppominity deuse as may be imposed upon con[raeturs and su5aontractars by the
`hal[ effe:t rcimbursemrnt of ttic tntal sum clue 6am the reguLer monthly fitcl 5rntc, Fedcral Elioway Adminisuacion, or ilie 3er.retary of Labor pursuant [o Part
~:nx ellntmcnts to thc .4gency froen the Motor k-'eNiclc Fund. No addiaional R, subpart A oCdhe Executive Order.
Federal projeca fundine will be approt^cd until fiell pa}•ment is received un6ess
ochenvise directscl the Assisun[ Secreter}, far Hit:hways nnd Local Prognms,
DQ7 F6mt i40-039 EF 3
Re~~ised 10102
In additicrn, Uie Agcncy a_erees thut iCic fflils or refuses co comph- cviBh thcse XV. Venue for Ctaims and/or Causcs of Action
undertakings, the SWle rriay trike eny or all oflh. Cullowing sctians: For the conveztiiencc of the panirs tn this contrnct, it is agrce9 tkint eny clsims
(e) Cancel, eerminute, (u sltspcnd thi.s ugrctm:nt i[i whU1c qr in pvt; Rndlar cuuses of octiutt which the I,ocal Asrncy tias ngainst 3he Stste nf
Washin~,rton, erowing out nCUtiis ccintrsct os the projcxt wit6 wliich it is
(b) Rcfrain frnm extending nny furcher assistnce tn the .Agrncy unda tlle cune^.m9d, shal] b` brought nnly in che. Superior Coun for Thurston County.
program u•ith rsspeci to wfiich the failure or relu-ca] occserrcd until satisfavory
assurunce offuturs aomptiance hns been reccivcd fmm the Agency, and XVI. CertificaUon Regarding the Restrictions of the Use
(c) Refa the case to the Depamnent of lustice for appropririu leeal proceedings. Of Federal Funds for Lobbying
7'he eppror•ing autharity cenifies, co the bcst of his ar her };nowlodge nnd belieC
chnt:
XIII. Liquidated Damages (1) \ ,o fttlerul a„propriEted fimcfs have hean puid ur will be paid, by or on behalf
7hs Agency hcrcby agrees that the iiqsiidatcd damagcs pravisioeu ofZ3 CI-R of tiia undersigned, tn iLny psrson far influ:.»cing or attcmPting to inlluence an
ran 635. Subp;ut 127, as supplrmented, reldtive to the nmount of Fec}:avl pff'iccr or employee of nnY federai agcncy, e member of Coneress, nn ofticet or
puticipation in the project cnst, sball be appiirahtc in the evest the aonaastar employes of Ccrogrcss, or an employee ot n memb=r of Gongress in cnnnecuan N•ith
fails m aomple[e the coatraci within the cnntraet time. Failtire m include the awarding nf uoY federal contrnlct, the rosking of any federal grant, die makuig of
]iquideted darnaga provision wiLl not rclicvc the .4eeney fiom reduction of any tederel loan, the rntering into of any tooperotive agrccment, and the extensian,
federul pvrticipntion in Rccordance with this Ewtagraph. condnuaticrn, ren:wtil, untencimcni, or mod'efication uC uny f9deral couitract, graai4
XIV. Termfnation for Public Convenience 1onn, or Cooperaiive egrctment.
'I"he Sccrctary of th: w'ushinLawi Stct: Dcpartmcnt of Transpoetsaoa may (2) If any funds ather thun fed:rnl apPropriatcd funcis 6ave been paid or will be
tcrtninate the concrace in afiole, or fiam time ta time in p8rt, wfirnever. Paid to eny pcrsoo for intluencing or a[tempting [o influ:ncc an o.ffiflct or cmployce
of any fcdual aLenc}•, e member of Congmss, nn ofT'ica ar emplayee of Caneress,
(1) The rcquisite fedMt-M funding beoomes unaveilable through faiturc a1' or un empluyee of a enember of Congr,ss in onnnectian Hq[h ttiis federni canQact,
appropriotioii or othcrw~ise. grant, 4oan, or cpoPerative a.greement, tFie under9igned shell campl.ie and submit
(2) The eonu'ector is prcvmted from pruc:eeding with the wnrk as e tlireCt the Slanderd Form - LLL, "Disclosurc Form to Repar? Lobbyine," in actordance
resuh of en Eacxutivc Order of the Presidcnt with respect to the nroseeurian of its insVUCtions.
war or ia the interest of national dcfense, or on Executivc Order af ihr (3) The undecsigiied shaU rcquire thec th: leneuuge af this cenification be
Fresidenc or Gnvernor of the Stnte wit6 respcct tn the presevation of :nergy included in the eward docum.nts fv; all subnwunds et all ders (including suhgrancs,
resources. und conunc[s nnd sobcontr'aces under grants, subgrunis, loans; und cooperative
(3) The rAntractor is Frevented fram prcr:Jeeding with the wnrk b}• rrason of 'Bccmenu) w•hich ewceed $100;400, and tNat all such sutirecipicnts shall certify
und disclose aocordingly,
e preliminnry, special, or parmnnent restrsining qrder of u cuurt of campcicnt
jurisdeetican w'here the issuanx of such order is prirnarily eaused by the eets uc cenifieation is a material rcpr_. entation of feet upon whi-c1i reliance was
nmissians of pcrsons nr age,ncies o[h:r chan the conunctor. ptaced whca thu transaccion a•as mede or entered into. Submissioa of this
. ccrtificscion es e preseyuisite Cor ntaking or entcring into thi; trnnsactian impnsed
by Sectioa 1352, Yitle 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required
(4) The Secretary determines iliat sucb tcrminetion i~s in the best iaterestS of certiication shall b_ subjocl to a eivd penalty of noi less than S 10.000 and not marc
the State. than S100,000 for ea-zli sucU failurc.
Additional Provisions ~ .
~
DOT Forcn 140-039 EF 4
RovisCd 10MON2
Adilk Washington State Local Agency Federal Aid
~ Department ot Transportation Project Prospectus
~ ?reflx Rou9e
~ FederalAid S.I.PUS ~84~ [Date ~ ~
2/2_/_005
Project Number ~ ~
Local Agency WSDOT Federal Employer
Pro;ect Number SR ~,C04-~~ (Use Only Tax ID Nlumber 71-091 41 70
Agency Federal Progtam Title
City of Spokane Valley 19 20.205' ❑ 20.209 [:1 Oiher
Rroyed Tfate Start Latitude N' Start longituQe W
AppleH^ay Avenue ReconstTUCtion
End Latitude N =nd Longitude W
Project Termini From To
Tschirley Road Nodges Road (City Limit)
From: 7e: Length of Project Award Type
MP 0.00 MP 126 1.26 miles N Local ❑ Local Forces ❑ State ❑ Railroad
Federal Agency City Number County Plumber County Name WSDOT Reglan
19 FF{VVA ❑ 0?iters 1223 32 Spokane BAS7'
Congressional Disfrict LegislaSve Distric3s Ur-bars Area Number TN~A / MPO / RTPO
5 q 2 SRTC
Total Local Agency Federal Funds Phase Start
Phase Estimated Cost Funding Date
(Neares: Hundred Dollar Nearest Hundred Dollar PJearest 3-iundred Oollar Nlonth Year
P.E. $193,000 $26,100 5166,900 10-005
R[W $416:000 $56,200 $359,800 4/2005
Cons4. $2,588,000 $349;400 $2,238,600 6/2006
Total $3;197;000 $431,700 $2;765,300
~ _1
Descri tion of Existing Facili (Existing Design and Present Condition)
Roadway Wiith Number o!l.anes
4
The eeneral stauctural condition of Appleway .Avenue becween 1'schirley Road to IIodges Road is poor. 1fie asphalt section of
Apple-vvay Ave. has medium whe.•l path flush.ing and low rutting. I'here is approx.imafely 123 feet pf iaw cp rnedium
longimdinal azid construction joint craclcing. There is also low wheel path flushing and runing in this section of road. The
remainder of the project is old concrete paving as demonstrated by the artached photos. There is numerous longitudinal aad
transverse cracking of the pavcment. There are numerous areas of cracldng sealing and patching that have been applie.d to
cxLend the ]ife of the ave;nent. The V'est bound ]anes have extensive wear and the cpncrete surface is s alline, badl .
Descri tion of Pro osed Work
Roadway Width Number of Lanes
Cg New Construction ❑ 3-R ❑ 2-R 74' curb-tacurb 4
1'he proposed project is intende.d to reconstruct the eKisting principal arterial to a five laue urban section. °T'his project completes
, the gap che currently exists benveen the recent urban irnpravements along $praoue Avenue to the west and Appleway Avenue to
the east. Curb, gutcer, sidewalks and bike lanes will also b: constructed.
locsl ,Sgency C4ntact Person Titla Phone
Steve M. Worley, P.E. Senior Enguieer (CIP) 509-688-0191
Mailing Address City Ttate Zip Code
11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spol:ane ~'alley VVA 99206
BY
Design Approval Approvfng Pro.esslonal Eng3neer
Title Senior Gapital Projects Engineer Da'te
OOT Forrr. 540-101 EF Page 1 of 3 ■ Supersedes Previous Editions ■
R9vised i212002
Agency Projeci Tit1e Dste
City of Spokane Valley lAppleway Avenue R.econstructian 2/22P22005
Geometric Design Data Description Through Route ~ Crossroad ~
23 Principal Arteriai 19 Principal Arterial
Federal ~ U~a~ O h4inor Arterial ~ ~~~n O Minor Arterial
❑ Collector ❑ Collector
Functional ❑ Major Collector ❑ Niajor Collector
ClassifiCation ❑ Rural ❑ Minor Collector El Rural ❑Minor Collector
❑ Access Street/Road O Access StreeURoad
Terrain 9 Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountafn N Flat ❑ Roll ❑ Mountain
Posfed Speed 35
Qesign Spsed 40
Existin ADT 9173
Desi n Year ADT
Design Year 2025
Design Hourfy Volume (DHV)
Accident - 3 Year Experience
Proe InEu Accidents Fatal Accadenfs
p ~ Total Number
Year Damage Number of Number of Number of Number of af Accidents
Accidents Accidents Injuries Accidents Fatalities
2000 - 2004 10 7 N/A N/A N/A 17
Performance of Work
Preliminary Engineering Will Be Periormed 3y Others Agency
Engineering Consultants 100 % %
Consiruclion Wi{I ae Fertormed By Cantract Agency
COIIl7ACtOP 100 % %
Environmental Classification
❑ Final 9 Preliminary
Q Class I - Environmental Impact Siatement (EIS) Class II - CategoAcally Excluded (CE)
❑ Project Irnolves NEPAlSEPA Sec6an 404 ❑ Projects Requiring Documentation
Interagency Agreement (Documented CE)
❑ Class III - Environmental Assessment (EA)
❑ Project Involves NEPA/SEPA Secxion 404
Interagency Agreement
Environmental Gonsiderations
DOT Focm 140•101 EF Page 2 of 3
Revtsed 1212002
A,gency Project Titie Da1e
City of Spol:ane Valley I Applewzjy Avenue Reconstruction 2/2212005
Right of Way
❑ No Right oi Way RQquired ~ Right of VJay Requirsd
" All construction reqUired by the ~No Reiocation ~ Relocation Required
contract can be accomplished
within the existing right of way.
Descripiion o+ UiUity RQIocaEfen or Adjustmen[s and Exisfing 14ajor Slructures Involved in the r^roJed
FAA Involvzment
Is any airport located within 3.2 kilometers (2 miles) of the proposed projeci? ❑ Yes ~ No
RemarY,s
~
This oroject has been reviewed by the legislative body of the administration agency or agencies, or it's designee, and is
not inconsistent with the agency's comprehensive plan for community development.
Agency City of Spokane Valle}~"
Date BY
- , hSayorfChai,-person
~
DOT Farm 14Cr901 Ef €'age 3 oi 3
Revised 1212002
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 2-22-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent old business X new business ❑ public hearing
information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Nuisance Code Amendment (yard sales)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 7.05
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Study session discussion by Council in January, 2005
BACKGROUND: In January, 2005, the Council discussed on-going problems in some
neighborhoods where some citizens have what appears to be perpetual or frequent yard sales.
These activities can be disruptive in neighborhoods, and really represents the performance of
commercial activity in residential neighborhoods.
A second problem exists warranting this type of amendment. Code enforcement officers can
receive a complaint about what appears to be garbage in somebody's yard, but when contact is
made with the resident, the person may assert that they are having a yard sale, or have put
things out to have a yard sale in the near future. Staff believes this proposed amendment will
preclude that type of argument having anything but very short term value.
A violation would result in a monetary penalty, and continued violation could subject the
property owner/resident to court action, including injunctive relief.
OPTIONS: Do nothing, instruct staff to amend the proposed ordinance, move to a second
reading.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to move this item forward for a
first ordinance reading.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: There may be minor staff time to respond to complaints. It is
anticipated to be generally revenue neutral.
STAFF CONTACT: Cary P. Driskell, Deputy City Attomey
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed amendrnent to Nuisance Code
~ J
nrflft
C1TY Ol+ SPQKANEi VALLCI'
~--J SPOKAIVL COUNTY, WASIilNGTQN
U1tllINANCE Nn. 05-0**
AN ORL)L\TAIYCE. ()F THF CJTY OF Sf'OIC_ANF VALLEY, SI'OKAN-E COCTa°TY,
WASHIlNG I`Ol1t, AM:rtvnING THL N-UI$ANCT RICGULATIONS TO P12ECLUDE•
ADDI'1'IUNA1, ACTIVITIES, AN'U PROVT_DING PENALTIF.S FOR V-IOLATIQ\7S.
1'Jl-IHREAS, the City has the duty and authority to maintain and prol:ect the healNi, saf'ety and
welfare of its citizens; and
'ArI-TEREAS, certain concli[ions exist on private property that are deti•imental to the public interest
a.nd interfere with the use and enjoyment of public and private prnperty in the comrriunity; a.nd
WI-IC-REAS, through nuisance regulations, the City is able to prohibit and abate conditions that
exist on property in an effori to improve the quality of life within dhe Cit}; anc!
WHEREAS, continuous and/or freyuent yard sales fmm residential properh, can adversely affect
nei5hboring properties.
NOW, T1-EREPORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains is
folloivs:
~ Section 1. Purpose and Intent. The pur}aose and intent of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC
~ j 7.05 ta inelude certain yard sale aetiviCy as a public nuisance, and to provide penalties for sueh actions.
Section 2. Ame.ndmcnt. Title 7, Section 05, Subscetion 020; is hereby amended to add a
ciefnition for "yard sale" as follows:
`Yard sale" means a sale of'secondhauid misc.e.llaneous objects from propertv in a re.sidentially-
zoned area. Tliis delinitinn includes similar terms includine, but not limited to, eara-,e szile. rumma~~e
sale, moving sale_ 1nd estate sale.
Section 3. Amcnclment. 1'itle 7, Section OS; Subsectiort 040 is hereby amended to add a
new subsection (R) as fallows:
7.05.040 Nuisances Prohibited.
No person, firm; or entity stiall crccc, contrive, cause, eontinue, maintain, or pennit to exist. any
public nuisances within the City. Prohibi[cct public nuislnces include, but are tiot limited to:
(.R) Yard sales. The holding nr permittin^ of ayard sale qn 1he same real nropertv more than
seven consecutivC drivs, or more rhan two eonsecutive weckenct5. or morc tlian three times in one
calendar year.
Section 4. Itemaiocter of SVV9C 7.05 Unchanged. `I'he rcmaining provisions of SVMC 7.05
are uncliangcd by this amendment.
Section S. Severability. lfiany section, sentence, elause or phrase of this prdinanee should bc
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of cnmpetent jurisdiction, sueh invalidiry or
' unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or consticutionality of any nther section, sentence, clatise or
phrasc of this Ordinance.
Or<lin<<nce Amcnding Nuisancc Ordinance Page 1 of 2
Draft
Sectioo 6. T'ffective 17ate. This Ordinance shall be in Full force and effect five (S) days after
public.ation of the Orclinance or a swnmary thereof in the official newspaper of Che Cit:y as provided by
law.
PASSEIa by die City Council t:his day of Ivlarch, 2005. Mayor, Michael DeVleming
ATTFST:
City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved ss to I+"orm:
Deputy City Attorney, Cary P. Driskell
Date of Publication:
Effective Uate:
Orditiance Amending Nuisajice Orclinance Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 2/22/05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 17 old business new business ❑ public hearing
Q information x admin. report pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Fiber and Internet Service for CenterPlace
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: Based on the premise that the new CenterPlace facility will be
technologically advanced, staff has been researching various options for telephone and
Internet service. The basic requirements for such a system include high speedlhigh
capacity Internet, wireless Internet services and video conferencing capability. Also, the
services at CenterPlace will be linked to City Hall to serve as a data storage and backup
system.
~ The option recommended by staff is "lit" fiber and full internet service provided by Time
~ Warner, Inc. The definition of lit fber is "fiber that includes all hardware and full
maintenance of the system." This is opposed to "dark" fiber wherein the City would
provide the hardware to make the system operable and would be responsible for ongoing
maintenance.
There is a one-time installation fee of $48,000 to run fiber to the building location. This
fee would be paid through the CenterPlace construction budget. The funds are available
for this installation. Also, it may be possible to share a portion. of the installation if
another entity in the same area, utilizes the same service. Once a decision is reached,
staff will explore this option.
In addition to the one-time installation, there would be ongoing monthly costs. The
current proposal from Time Warner is a fixed monthly cost of $2,300 ($27,600 per year)
for 5 years. At the end of that period, the fee would be re-negotiated.
The annual fee is significant in that it is approximately $20,000 per year more than the
amount budgeted in the pro-forma for telephone services.
At this time it is unknown if there will be savings in other aspects of the pro-forma that
might make up the difference in these costs. For example, the City has not yet contracted
for janitorial or HVAC (heating ventilation and air conditioning services), etc. Therefore, it
should be assumed that the $20,000 will represent a net increase.
OPTIONS: Direct staff to bring this item back for formal consideration on March 8, 2005.
Or 1`~ J Request other action from staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Schedule for formal action on March 8.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: One time installation fee of $48,000 covered in CenterPlace
construction budget. Net ongoing increase in annual operating budget of about $20,000/year for ,
service fees. ~
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, Bing Bingaman
ATTACHMENTS Power Point presentation
;
, ~
%
- ,
L - - ...ib
• 'j
' Fa.ber, Yntern.et and Phone
: costs for Ceaa.ter Place
. _ ;
;
Providing a High Tech ! State of the Art
solution for video and teleconferences
~
~
~ Fiber vs. T-1
; ■ Newer Technology ■ Older Technology
■ Unlimited bandwidth ■ g MB maximum, limited
~ ■ Better QoS (Quality of growth
Service) ■ Slower for backups and
Room for Growth disaster recovery
! ■ Cheaper to build now
than later ! budgeted
■ Use CenterPlace as an
offsite backup and
disaster recovery site
~
1
l
i
• I
~
~Dark Fibet- Solution / Lit Fiber Sol~ution
~
. We provide all hardware ■TVVrC provides redundant
. ? approx, S 15,000 electronics throughout network
j ■ Usually nat redundant ■Easily scalable solution
due to cos4s ~~p~g.100M6)
' ■ We pay for hardware
upgrades for speed ■ Expertise for OoS for
■ We must manage; time, providing esssntial servioes.
cost of staf~ and Less liabili4y for city
expertiss
■ Is the problem the fber, ■ ►ionitored and alarmed 24/7
>
~ infernet or hardware? ■ Ability to do multicasting
SeParate venders to deal (sending traffic to more than
j with. one location)
■ We pay for any ■ pne call to solve problems
maintenanae or repairs
. Easier to connect future City
Hall and other buildings
Bui.l.d costs and monthly re-occurring
costs (MRC)
~ i Dark fiber ■ Lit Fiber
■ $41,000 build ■ $48,000 build
~ - ■ $2,275 MRC ■ $2,300 MRC
- ~ ~ includes point-to- includes point-to-
point connection point connection
. ~ and 10 MB Internet and 10 MB Internet
~ i from CenterPlace connection
z
2
' Fiber 8 tnternet for Centor Placu c4st over e 5 year per4od
S?SQ.ooo.m
• , . • i,~,»~
' SiEQ.00]-00 ..i . . ' . . - , .r_~.
U~5,715_
f1/0.9CU.00 - > . . - -
~ 52~,-q u~'. - :
snc - ~
4I2QQOO.P7 _ . . ~ ~ . ' - .
SxNo mic
EtR?,00~.00 - .
. :.2TS ' • . .
raaro
f:0.906.G0
/
f50.0C0.00
2td0.oo -7.~,=00---------"'°,• . . . ,
OM
- ;.~a7kM»/Ft-meyipmst.
L . " . .
S 3 5 7 8 it 0 15 tl 19 21 23 25 27 28 31 33 95 97 99 At 43 45 Q49 51 53 Sb 57 E8
TtTO L-i Mon!.~a
Timc-lt'ucar TxJ pkl -Galurde 70 rotal (D_Rs)
~
~
. I
~ Phones
-i
;
Voice Over Internet Protocol system (VOIP)
~
i ■ Call traffic routed via fiber to City Hall, uses
~ phone trunks here.
1
Only need 4 analog lines at Center Place for
,
~ Fire, Security and Elevator
;
i
3
i
.
i
Monthly Re-Occurring Costs
' ■ Monthly charges for fiber will result in annual
` fees of approximately $27,600.
■ This fee is significant in that it is approximately
! .$20,000 per year more than the amount budgeted
in the pro-forma for telephone services.
At this time it is unknown if there will be savings
~ in other aspects of the pro-forma that might make
1 up the difference in these costs. For example, the
City has not yet contracted for janitorial or HVAC
(heating ventilation and air conditioning
services), etc. Therefore,it should be assumed
• that the $20,000 will represent a net increase.
4
CI'1'1' OF
pO1[arle
;OoValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley V!A 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: David Mercier, City Manager, and Members of Council
From: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Date: February 22, 2005
Re: Monthly Report - Summary of January 2005 Activities
Contract Ne(,,otiation and tldrTiinistr.ttion
• Service Agreenients tivith Spokume Cvarnty. City and County sraff have esscntially
completed the languagc of the model aereements; and are now compiling the
attachments, whieh detail ttie cost of each service. Once finali4ed, lhey will be presenled
to Citv Council for considEration.
Operations
~ 1 • Recruittrtents. There arc a number of vacant positions. Following is the recruitment
slatus nf each position as of the ei-id of January:
L'osition Statrt_s
Engineer - Louis Ctraf has ac:cepted the position. His first day -iri t}ie ofTce is :Capital I'rojects expected to l~e 1!f.arch 1.
AccountandBudget We have intervie~~.~ecl eandidates and liave made a conditiqnal offer of
Analyst em~loyment. _
S[ormwatzr Fitp-inecr We hflve inicrviewed candidateand are in the dcliberation srage.
Coc1e ` We nre in tfie application review stage, to seleet candidates for
Enforcement Officer intervicws.
AdministrativeAssis[ant We are scres;ning applicstioris for minimwn qutilifeabons, and tihen .
conducting skills testing. Supervisors will thcn be revievving'ttic~.! _
applications tq select c:andidatzs for inCecviews. There are tw~o
vacancies in lhis s;lassificatiott the;Admin Assistant fbr C:omniun.ity .
_ 'Development, and the neNv Adiiiin Assistant for GenlerPlace.
CenterPlacc Coordinator Position clases rebruary l S.
R.ccruat'ion C:'oordinatorT'osition closes T'ebrLin, 25.
Stormwater Position closes rebruary 25.
Enpineering Technician
Deputy City n7anager Monfhly Report -January 2005, continucd
February 22, 2005
F'age 2 of 2
Web Site
WeG Site ,Scrnrnaarv - Moirl/t of Janttary 1005
Uni ue User Sessions 19,375
'I'o Five Pages Viewcdy
Employiilent. 3,947
Em loymetit Application 576
GTS/Ma s 475
Council Age»clas w1d Minutes 399
De artmeuts 375
To Nive "liefer•rer•" Wcb Sites
S okaile Count}, - Jobs 395
S okaiie Councy - C,ov't Lm loyment 304
Spok.ane Vallev pnline 241
Municipal Research aiid Services Center (MRSC) 151
S olcaile V alley Cliamber of Coiiimerce 53
*note: Numbers reilect full or mnjority weel:s of the month.
~
, ~
C-Icrrv cu'
pO~.ile
~-.Vall.ey
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager
From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
CC: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Date: February 10, 2005
Re: Monfhly Report
Finaiicc employees workcd in lhe following areas duruig the month of January. Multiyear financial plan
j-~ Revenue and expenditure projections have been updated with exccss revenues being
applied to the. Street 1 und (problem statement #2) aaid city capital needs (problem
statemeni 43). The General Fund, Street Fund and icieutificd ciiy capital needs have
been addressed through 2006.
Budyet variance/inve.stment reports
Reports showing a comparison o[' fund revenues dnd expendittires to our 2004 amencled
budget at Iaecember 31, 2004; are attached. These numbcrs include 2004 revenues
which were received in c3rly 2005, and 2004 expenclitures -vvluch were paid in earl}'
2005. No significant, additional changes in 2004 revenues or expendilures are anticipated. Lxpenditures are less tban our projections and revenues exceeded our projections
espccially in sales tax revenues, plaruung/building f'ees and fineslforFeitures.
The investment report at T)eceriiber 31, 2004 is also attached.
Vacant accountant/budp-ei analyst position
lnterviews have been conducied with applicants Cor the vacant !lecountant/Budgct Analyst
position. We expect to have the position filled in March.
~
~
Year end financial statements
;
T'he accotulting records for 2004, are ncaring closurc. Work has started on preparing the
Comprehensivc Annual Financial Report which will eventually be audited by the State
Auditor's Office. This is a major undertaking and represents a sigiuficant portion of our
workload.
Proiect accounting
F.ach ycar we inc(ude scveral capital projects in our budget. Many of these capital projects
come to the city with several Punding saurces including fedcral and state grants. The city
has various funding sourecs includ'uig bond sale proceeds, arterial street fund resources and
real estace excise tax. Each funding source often has a scparatc set of rules which need tn
be followed.
Frojecl cASts often need to be groupcd in cate€orics dictatcd by the funding source. These
categories include prelimindry engineering, right of way, city averhead and actual
constr.uction. State budoeC law requires we budgei by calenclar year even though projects
uiay begin in one year and end in another. Mdst grants require che city to pay project
costs and thcn request reimbursement from the granting agency. 7t is important to proeess
reimbursement requests in a timely way to avoid cash flow prablems. Thus, accounting for
capital projects is coanplicated aaid time consuming.
~
StafFstarted implementing a project accounting systcm last year. We still have much to do
ui tlus area and expect this task ta occupy mueh ofqur time during the next six inonths.
. ~
;
City of Spokane Valley
` General Fund - at 2-10-05
Budget Variance Report
For the Period January 1- December 31, 2004
Budget December YTD Unrealiaed Percent
• 2004 Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized
General Fund Revenues:
Praperty Tax 5 9,265,809 ~ 985,008 $ 8,980,837 $ 284,972 96.92%
Sales Tax 11,920,000 2,358,271 14,681,175 (2,761,175) 123.16
Gambling Tax 690,000 226,343 880,126 (190,126) 127.55
Leasehold Excise Tax 5,000 869 4,449 551 88.97
Franchise Fees/Business Licenses 640,000 197,310 679,461 (39,461) 106.17
State Shared Revenues 882,816 287,243 1,104,311 (221,495) 125.09
Planning & Building Fess 1,139,000 122,072 1,795,305 (656,305) 157.62
Fines and Forfeitures 1,000,000 203,607 1,261,955 (261,955) 12620
Recreation Program Fees 201,000 6,464 129,036 71,962 64.20
Investment Interesl 18,000 13,555 69,547 (51,547) 386.37
Operating Transfers 42,500 - 57,296 (14,796) 134.81
S 25,804,125 $ 4,400,743 S 29,643,500 $ (3,839,375) 114.88%
Budget December YTD Unrealiaed Percent
2004 Expenditures Exnenditures Expenditures Realized
General Fund Expenditures:
Legislative Branch S 215,372 $ 21,180 $ 195,165 $ 20,207 90.62%
Executive & Legislative Support 438,482 43,305 353,597 74,885 82.92
Public Safety 14,693,990 1,358,757 14,483,635 210,355 98.57
Operations & Administrative Svcs 917,645 88,154 836,133 81,472 91.12
Pubfic Works 631,079 62,947 611,657 19,422 96.92
Planning & Community Dev. 1,574,519 206,460 1,440,180 134,339 91,47
Library Services 2,453,250 - 2,020,296 32,354 98.40
Parks & Recreation 1,601,780 116,086 1,380,243 221,537 86.17
General Govemment 3,450,578 168,659 1,077,653 2,372,925 3123 16
S 25,576,655 ~ 2,065,548 S 22,408,558 $ 3,168,097 87.61%
For 2004 revenues received and expenditures paid through January 31, 2005.
f
211112005 e:20 aM
City of Spokane Valley
Other Funds - At 2-10-05 -
`
Budget Variance Report
,
For the Period January 1- December 31, 2004
Budget December YTD Unrealized Percent
2004 Revenues R.v~~ enues evenue Ralized
Othor Funds Revenues:
Street Fund $ 2,062,200 $ 233,151 $ 1,404,134 $ 658,065 68.09%
Arterial Street Fund 542,000 91,403 546,213 (4,213) 104.78
Trails and Paths 12,800 8,492 8,492 4,308 66.34
HoteUMotel Fund 384,000 55,592 365,051 14,949 96.07
Debt Service - LTGO 03 800,000 - 580,928 219,072 72.62
Gapital Projects Fund 640,000 164,859 1,052,578 (212,578) 125.31
Speciat Capital Projects Fund 840,000 164,238 983,713 (143,713) 117.11
Street Capital Projects 3,230,000 549,388 1,267,684 1,962,316 39.25 8
Mirabeau Point Project 3,000,000 573,391 2,957,565 42,435 98.59
Street Bond Capiial Projects 30,000 3,473 37,726 (7,726) 125.75
CD Block Grant Fund 504,000 268,114 273,114 230,886 54.19 8
Capital Grants Fund 837,000 4,559 97,050 739,950 11,59 8
Barker Bridge Reoonstruciion 702,000 - - 702,000 - 8
Sewer Fund - - 334 (334) -
Storrnvrater Mgmt Fund 747,500 79,214 767,475 (19,975) 102.67
Equip. Rental & Replacement 146,634 64,189 129,071 17,563 88.02
Risk Alianagement 137,500 4,543 134,804 2,636 98.04
$ 14,811,634 $ 2,284,597 $ 10,605,932 $ 4,205,702 71.61%
.
Budgei December YTD Unrealized Percznt
,,?0~04 EXRenditures EXQenditures Exoenditures i2ealizsd
Other Funds Expcnditures:
Street Fund $ 3,773,184 $ 423,312 S 3,147,223 $ 625,361 83.4196
Arterial Street Fund 600,000 311 5,311 594,689 0.89 7
HateUMotei Fund 475,000 82,046 450,383 24,617 94.82
Deb! Senrice LTGO 03 800,000 - 580,928 219,072 72,62
Capital Projects Fund 180,000 22,996 115.639 64,365 64.24 7
Special Capital Projecks Funti 300,000 - 292,643 7,357 97.55
StreetCapital Projects 3,219,700 548,342 1,265,893 1,953,807 39.32 8
Mirabeau Point Project 9,500,000 739,398 6,051,185 3,448,895 63.70 8
Street Bond Capital Projects 2,460,000 509,514 1,120,318 1,339,682 45.54 8
CO Bloc4c Grant Fund 504,000 397,432 402,743 101,257 79.91 8
Capital Grants Fund 837,000 4,603 97,026 739,974 11.59 8
Barker Bridge Reconsttuction 762,000 53 53 701,947 - 8
Sewer Fund 238,608 41,347 236,941 (333) 100.14
Starmwater Mgmt Fund 558,700 72,488 129,046 389,654 24.88 9
Equip. Rental 8 Replacemnt 43,600 (46,630) 11,622 31,978 26_66
Risk Management 137,500 - 111,066 26,434 80.78
$ 24,289,292 ~ 2,785,154 S 14,020,020 $ 10,269,272 57.72%
For 2004 revenues received and expendifures paid through January 31, 2005.
?J1 112005 a:zonrn
% - ~ City of Spokane Valley
Investment Report
For the Month Ending December 31, 2004
Total
LGIP' F&M f'VrM Investments
Beginning $ 10,015,674.57 $ 5,380,054.23 S 15,395,728,80
Deposits 1,532,113.68 - 1,532,113.68
+Nithdrawls (1,575,000.00) - (1,575,000.00)
Interest 17,893.95 9,047.35 26,941.30
Ending $ 9,990,68220 S 5,389,101.58 S 15,379,783.78
Balances bv Fund
General Fund S 3,241,116.32
Street Fund 3,286,277.15
Arterial Street 781,809.43
Paths & Trails 8,492.03
HotellMotel 125,260.08
Capital Projects 1,423,663.22
Spec. Capital Proj, 1,083,797.95
Street Capital Proj. 32,665.50
Mirabeau Point Proj. 2,694,816.45
Street Bond Proj. 1,425,429.73
Stormwater Mgmt. 1,178,502.23
Equipment Rental 72,940.25
Risk Management 25,013.44
$ 15,379,783.78
*Local Government Investment Pool
211112005 8:20 AM
ciec
FOOTNOTES
7 Used primarily for capital projects. Cash is not moved until the project needs it.
8 Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, acquire right of way and
constnact.
9 60% of this budget is tied to projects not yet underway.
16 40% of this budget is reserves. Emergency use only.
;
~
211112005 8:20 AM
Spcrn,k`a.ne
Vall.ey
11707 E Sprague Ave Suiie 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, Nina Regor, Members of City Council
From: Mike Jackson
Date: February 10, 2005
Re: Monthly Report, February 2005
Adrninistration ancl Parks:
•A Request for Proposal for the operation and maintenance of Cicy pool facilities has bcen
issued to the YMCA. The deadline for submittal of their Proposal is March 4, 2005. Staff
is also preparing an estimated cost for "in house" operation of the pools.
• The Departmeut is in the Cinal process of selecting furniture for CenterPlace. Staff is also
work:ing with other departments ta finalize plans for ihe technology components of
~ CenterPlace.
• The sale of all surplus park vehicles/equipmcnt was complcted witli Scnske Landscape.
Senske also submitted a proposal tor the annual cast of Cente.nnial Trail mauitenance.
Tlus information will bc presented to City Council on March 1, 2005.
• Job minounccments were posted for the CenterPlace Coordinator azid Recreation
Conrdinator positions. The closing date for the CenterPlace Coordinator is February 18
and the closing date for the Recreation Coordinator is Fcbruary- 25.
• Thcre are several focus group meetings plamled with the Master Plan consultants on
ljebruary l70'. The equestrian group; Crreen Acres group, City Flarining Dept. and senior
citizens have been invitcd.
Scaior Center:
• The Senior Center Association is sellin~ 3 of their billiard tables.
• Two board members and the association's cmployee have resigned this weck.
• The Scnior NUtrition Yrogram has served 220 meals per week for thc la,.~t month.
i
/ , ~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MONTHLY REPORT FOR JANUARY 2005
i
LONG RANGE PLANNlNG DIVISION:
Planning Commission
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission met twice during the month of January The
Commission's agenda included Public Hearings for the proposed City of Spokane Valley
Stormwater Ordinance and amendments to the Sign Code. The Public Hearing on CPA 07-04
amending the Arterial Road Plan was continued until February 10, 2045.
The Commission also moved to amend the Rules of Order to convene at 6:00 p.m. on the
second and fourth Thursdays, with meetings to extend not later than 9:00 p.m.. The Planning
Commission schedule would coincide with that of the City Council, whose meetings begin at
6:00 p.m..
Comprehensive Plan Development
Long Range Planning staff continues to develop final drafts of the first Spokane Valley
Comprehensive Plan. A discussion draft of all Comprehensive Plan chapters has been posted
~ on both the City of Spokane Valley`s home page and the Long Range Planning web page.
These chapters will be updated in February.
CURRENT PLANNING DIVISlON:
The Current Planning Division opened 15 land use application files in January 2005. In
addition, 41 licenses/permits were sold.
2005 Licenses & Permits Issued The following charts track present monthly
activity with 2004 levels. LicenselPermits
so includes adult entertainment, home
rV - profession, temporary use and sign review
40
~
permits.
, zo - -
~n s-
0
.lan Feh ° ffir apr 6uy .nm ►n aug sov ocI Ariv Ltic Ii
~ 2005 41 ' " -
~7pOt B 9 1 sB t5 i 8.... 19 tt 17 70 14 7 tt
2005 Land Use Actions
Land Use Actions include binding site plans, 40 _ i
rezones, subdivisions, short plats, bvundary
line adjustments, street vacations, site plan 30" - "
,
reviews and SEPA reviews. 20
,o • - _
o . .
.A3n Feb l..ar Apr May Jun .tul Aug Sep Ott Nov Dec
p 2005 -a- 200-0
Page 1 of 6
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Community Development
Monthly Report for January 2005
Monthly revenue for the Current Planning Division totaled $20,905 in January; 11.61 % of the `-'amount budgeted in 2005.
- In January 2005, the Current Planning
2005 Planning Revenues Division served 184 customers at the
Planning Counter, and returned or
35,000.00 ~ answered 236 phone calls. Three
ao,ooo.oo Public Hearings were held before the
25,000.00
- Hearing Examiner in January. The
. 20,000.00
-
,s.aao.oo f~~ Plannin9 Division staff also scheduled
1o,aoo.oo - 5 land use pre-application meetings
5,000.00 during the month. Moreover,
o•~ - commercial project activity was high
~O ,Z~i vob '~e oa '?0 op during the month. Four commercial
project applications were submitted
E= RaveR„e 2005 -+-Revenue 2004 and Planning signed off on 5
- ° commercial permits. Commercial pre-
application meetings were held on a number of projects including the following:
1. 300+ unit apartment complex on South Conklin;
2. Warehouse addition in the Industrial Park;
3. 6,000 square foot office building on Broadway west of Pines; and
4. 100,000 square foot building complex (Itronics) on Mirabeau Parkway.
Revenues generated by the Planning Division are compared with tfie 2005 Budget appropriation below.
2005 Planning Revenues Compared with Budget
I„antl lke Ac4ions
I l
k
licenses 8 Femits "
0 20000 40000 60000 60000 100000 120000 140DOQ 16U000 180000
`D Actval YTD Revenve D Annual Budget Fstingte
Page 2 of 6
City of Spokane Valiey
Departrnent of Community Development
Monthly Report for January 2005
\ l
^ SU/LD/NG DIVlSION:
The Building Division issued 230 permits in January. This is 63% of the number of permits
issued in December but a 207% increase over January'04. 12 new single family dwellings and
2 buildings with 6 condominium units +nrere permitted.
20005 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
400
•
- - - - -
300
2{!0 - 2005 Pennits
200-4 Pertrifts
a . . . . . . I
Jan Feb A9ar Apr hAay .tune ,luly Aug Sepi Oct Nov Dec
The reporteti value of construction, including new structures and additions/alteration is shown in
the following chart, comparing these values with 2004.
_ _ s I The Permit
2005 New Structures Permitted CE'n1ef
collectetf
$71,432 in
Permit and
Plan Review
~ J e 5 Fees in
O J~ Ftb ►Ari Apr I IA~y J~nc JuIY ALD SeDt OG NOV ~ pgp January~ a
o Nea~ 18 2 Dwe9ir+p } 212~ ~0 12 6 l ~ ~ increase over
o►nw~~.ra,w~vu~s u ~
the same
period last
year_ The
Permit Center reports no noticeable decrease in activity January to continue to be active as
interest rates remain Iow and the weather remains somewhat mild.
2005 Building Revenues
sa,or,a,oo
$1s0,ooa.oQ
~ 2aO5 Re%enuP
S100,000,0U..Y.._....
-4-2004 RewrnP-s
55D.400.U0
5flA0. - f ~
.}an Feb Itar Ap It-y June Jily Aup Sept Oct Nov 0.Y
\ .i
Page 3 of 6
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Community Development
Monthly Report for January 2005
2005 Valuation of Construction
aooooaoo
1EOOOdOO -
16000000 - -
14000000
-
12000000
- - -
0 2005 valuation
10004000
'w~•~ ' ~ s-zooa valuation
soooooo
6000000
aoooaoo
20000000
. ' . . . . . .
Jan Feb Mar Apr AAay June July Aug Sept Oct R~av laeC
A comparison of Building Division fiscal activity through the month of January to annual budget
2005 YTD BuiDding Reuenues Compared wkA 8udgct
License 8 Perml Fecs I I I
i
i
0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,00e1 900,000 1,000,00 '
0 '
Ip Actua! YTO Revemie B Annual Revenue Projeceon
projections can be found below:
In 20 business days we performed 760 inspections. This averages out to 38 inspections per
day. We used an on-call inspector full time during January and that inspector was able to
accomplish 248 inspections. Our second on call inspector was assigned inspection duties for
one day and accomplished 10 inspections. This confirms the assistance these additional staff
members have given our full time staff. Our workload has continued to be more manageable
using this labor resource. Over the next few months we continue to expect a large volume of
inspection requests, since inspection requests track actual permit activity.
2005 Building Inspections
imo
1040
z
soo • • - . i'I
600 - _ •j ~ 2005 InspeUicrtis '
2704 Inspecaioro
400
200
0 . . . . . . . .
,k~n Feb .+Aa Apr May June July Avg Sept Oct Nbv IJet TOTk!
Page 4 of 6
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Community Development
Monthly Report for January 2005
-
We continue to experience a high volume of Commercial Plan Review activity so we continue to
use our On Call Pool for plan review of 1& two family residential structures. That individual is
working at about a.4 FTE rate at this time.
The Building Official attended the Washington Association of Building Officials Winter Business
Meeting January 13th and 14'1. During the business meefing he participated in the Technical
Code Committee and Outreach Committee meetings. The Outreach Committee is planning
WABO's portion of the joint meeting with AWC in June.
The Professional Development portion of the business meeting discussed a new soils mapping
program developed by the Washington Department of Natural ResourcQS, Division of Geology
and Earth Resources. The soils maps will help us identify weaker soils and areas subject to
liquefaction within Spokane Valley. The maps will also be available for inclusion into the
Spokane County GIS system to benefit all the citizens of the County. This program has been
funded by mitigation funds available to the state through a FEMA grant following the Nisqually
Earthquake in 2001. .
~J
Page5of6
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Community Development
Monthly Report for January 2005
CODE COMPLIANCE:
The number of "Violations Reported" on the following chart reflects actual Spokane Valley
Zoning Code violations, plus complaints received which were not violations. The complaints
received are added to the total because they reflect time officers spent in the field conducting
investigations. In addition, the "Investigated° and pPending" columns accurately reflect Code -
CODE COMPLIANCE STATUS REPORT .
soo - ~
400
3t10
!M- 200 - -
100 - - - _ _ - o _ _ _
J 04 F 04 Mdd q 04 M Qd J Q4 J 04 A 04 S 04 0 04 N 04 U 04 Jan OCi
e Vahliuns Reeported B Abafenr.nts a Re Trens(ers s fhndng Files ~
Compliance's current ability to process and investigate backlog cases due to additional stafFng.
The following chart provides a monthly comparison of the types of Spokane Valley Code
violations reported. In order to make the chart easier to follow, activity has been consolidated
into the following five categories: Environmental (sewer/septic, critical areas, animal and
nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way, property use, dangerous building, landlord/tenant,
illegal business and signage violations); Junk Auto; Solid Waste (solid waste, illegal dumping,
and household waste violations); and Complaint - No Violation.
CODE COMPLIANCE REPORTS (by type) ~
1 0096 - - -
80%
60%
a ~
401,b
1 ~
r,
26%
f
d% .s ~ . ~ ~ _ J 04 F 04 pd QM1 A 04 M 04 J 04 J 04 A 04 S 04 004 ~ N 04 D 04 Jan OS
e C.ortp181nt - No ViOtafion 28 16 14 19 17 16 ~ 21 18 1S
p SaGd Waste 10 14 11 19 31 16 15 23 22 18 16 15 58 p.lLnk Aulo 70 21 16 11 25 24 16 24 21 19 18 17 12
S Roperty 9 13 6 16 15 39 18 10 32 13 13 11 lA
6 Et►vironrren;al 8 13 96 14 17 54 11 16 18 S9 11 7
\
Page 6 of 6
Spo"Fkane
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Valley MONTHLY REPORT 49;00
January 2005
Aqreements for Services Adapted and in Operation:
• County Street Maintenance
Proposed Contract Changes for 2005:
o In 2005 Contract, propose to delete reference under'Basic Services' that worlc be done as
customarily done by the County and add that work be as directed by the City.
o More detailed definition will be developed to the list of activities.
• Street Maintenance - WSDOT
• County Utilities - Storm Water Management
Contract ends on December 31, 2004.
• Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal
Wastewater:
• Wastewater Treatment - The end of January the City received from the County financial information
regarding the County's sewer utility as it relates to the assumption of the County owned sewer facilities.
• County submitted the SRF Loan to the Department of Ecology and has received conditional approval.
• Draft Spokane River Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) is available on the UAA web site at
http://www.sgokaneri'veruses,net/links.htm
Capital Proiects:
• Received $1.16 million federal grant (CMAQ) for PineslMansfield project. Sent out final Mitigation
Agreement to all developer partners.
• Held Barker Rd. Bridge project kick off meeting with CH2M HILL and other subconsultants.
• Held interviews for the Engineer-Capital Projects position.
Construction Projects
o Centerplace
The Centerplace Project is nearing the seventy-five percent (75%) completion mark. The weather has co-
operated allowing the roofing to continue and is nearing completion. Landscaping activities are picking up
with the installation of the site sprinkler system and landscaping will be more confined to the completion of
the Northern portion of the site.
Rough-in activities have been completed with the completion of inechanical and electrical work in the
kitchen. Taping and sanding activities in the main entry are nearing completion in preparation of painting
and application of gypsum wall products is confined to the last remaining area of the structure; the kitchen
and 'Great Room' and various support rooms in that area. All window framing and glazing has been
completed. Finishing activities such as painting and application of ceramic tile are in progress. Project
technical hardware items such as security cameras, video equipment, telecommunication systems are
currently under considerafion with the wiring for these items for the most part already in place. The bid
package for furnishings will be put out for bids within the next few weeks.
The project continues to be successful in addressing program requirements, workmanship and products
continue to be c4nsistent with industry standards, and the project continues to be ahead of schedule and
~
_J within budget.
o Barker Road Project
Project being designed - Open house me2ting scheduled for February 17th
o Barker Road Bridge Project
Consultant selected for Type Size and Location Study
16th Avenue Project
Project items to be completed in spring are yard restoration including sprinkler systems, fencing and
swales at Dishman-Mica and Pines.
Project open to traffic
o Park Road Proiect
15` lift of asphalt placed. 2"d lift of asphalt, completion of concrete work and striping remain in 2005.
Project open to traffic.
o Sherwood ForesUMica Park/Johnston Sanitary Sewer Proiect
Project being designed
o Inland Sanitary Sewer Proiect
Project being designed
o Parks Road Sanitary Sewer Project
Project being designed
o Edqerton Sanitary Sewer Proiect
Project being designed
o Orchard Avenue Sanitary Sewer Prolect
Project being designed
o Carnahan Sanitary Sewer Proiect
Project awarded to Norms - Construction scheduled to begin March 2005
Maintenance Activitv:
• City 2005 budget is $1,589,292. Additionally, we budgeted $300,000 for contracted minor road
maintenance that we are using to cover the County contract.
• Through the end of January the County has billed $247,831 or 15.6% of the budgeted funds.
Land Development
• New Applications - Commercial
Indiana Professional Center 27,644 s.f. office building
Conoco Gas Tank 55,000 s.f.
Bonner Short Plat (Pre-Application) 2 lot short plat
Nerren Office Building (Pre-Application) 6000 s.f. office building
PBI Warehouse (Pre-Application) 4048 s.f. warehouse addition
Shelley Lake Iv9ulti Family * 14 Apartment Buildings (200 - 300 units)
• New Applications - Residential
Flagstone RezonelPlat (Pre-Application) 16 lot plat and rezone
• Commercial Construction Plan Review submittals
24 Hour Fitness
Retail Building at Thierman/Sprague
Hooters RestauranUCasino
Hamilton Court Apartments Grading Permit
Incyte Pathology ~
Terry's Truck Cen#er Panda Express
• Residential Construction Plan Review submittals
Pine Rock Ridge - 2"d Addition
Flora Springs PUD
~ Valley View PUD (County Project)
Flora Estates
Park Place PUD
Flagstone Short Plat
Cook Short Plat
Berry Short Plat
• Binding Site Plan Construction Plan review submittals
Meilke BSP
Donwood BSP
• Residential Hearings Held
None
• Commercial Hearings held
Rezone for multi-family use
\ _J
,
r
v Scr
po`ane
,,;w0Va11ey Capital Improvement Projects
2005 PROPOSED PROJECTS
Road Construction Projects Project Location Estimated Design Construction 2005 Total Project
Completion Date Complete Complete FundinQ Cost
' Par9c Raad - Projeck 2 8th Avenue to 2nd Avenue 711l05 ti0096 80% $ 821,000 $ 972,000
' lfth Avenue - I'roject 2 Dishman-Mica Road to SR 27 5/1l05 100% 95% $ 1,932,400 $ 3,302,000
" Barker Road Reconstruction Boone Avenue to Bar4cer Road Bridge 10l15105 20% 0% S 1,150,000 $ 2,998,200
' Dishman-Mica 12oad Rehabilitation Sprague Avenus to Appleway Avenue 611105 0"0 0% s 49,400 $ 57,100
' Arganne Road Overlay Indiana Avenue to A4ontgamery Avenue 7/1105 0°r6 0% $ 274,000 $ 316,600
" Broadway Avenue Overlay Bates Road to Sullivan Road 9/1l05 O% 0% $ 703,000 $ 812,700
Road Design Projects
` F'ines/Mansfield Project Wilbur Rd. to Pines Rd., Pines to 190 10l1106 0% 09'o S 620,000 $ 3,134,000
` Appleway Avenue Recanstruction Tsciiirley Rd. to Hodges Rd. 9/1106 0% 0% s 166,900 S 3,197,000
Barker Road Bridge Replacement Barker Rd_ at Spokane River 1211/D6 011/0 0% $ 702,000 $ 8,057,615
Sewer Projects
Camahan I-90 to 8th, Havanna to Eastem 711l05 100% 0% $ 2,569,000 $ 2,569,000
ShsrNwod ForesUMica Paric/Johnston Appleway to 16th, Siesta to Woodruff 911l04 90% 0°/a S 2,570,000 S 2,570,0D0
Inland Broadway to Sprague, I-90 to Park 8l1104 80% 0% $ 660,000 S 660,000
Parks Road Trent to I-90, Thierman to Park 1011l04 50% 09'0 $ 1,445.000 $ 1,445,000
Edgerton Utah to Trent, Elizabeth to Park 1011/04 509'0 0% $ 2,543,400 $ 2,503,000
Orchard Avenue Spokane River to Liberty, Coleman to Vista 1011l04 50% 0% $ 2,895,000 $ 2,895,000
Miscellaneous
Valley Couplet $
Centerplace at Mirabeau Point
Construction in Progress 8J05 100% 75% $ 9,540,0D0 $ 9,540,00+0
Total $ 28,560,300 $ 44,989,215
' Statewide Transportation Plan (S7'Ip)
Transportation Irnprovement Board (TIB)
8ridge Replacement Advisory Committee (SRAC)
2005 C '-iction Projects January
, . ,
1 MFMO
TQ: Dave Mertier, City 1Vlanager
F1ZUM: Cal `Vallter, Chief of Policc
nale Golman, Administrative Sergeant
DATE: Februarr,10, 2005
ltE-•: Monthly Report January 2005
Aicached is the activiiy re.port for January; 2005 i:or the Spokane Valley Policc Department.
'Tliere was a total of 4,736 computer-aided dispatch (CAD) incidents. 1'hese are. self-initiated
officcr contacts, as well as calls fpr sen~ice. Out of th4se 4,376 incidents; 1,390 actual reports
were eak.en during the mnnth of Jaiiuary. Attached is the breakdown describuig those incidents.
.4dditionally, thcre were 1,438 traffic st4ps conducted that resulted in 182 traffic reports.
Included are the hotspot maps for Januar), residential burglarics, January cornincrcial burglaries
and January craf[ic collisions, along with December & January stolen vehiclcs.
A:UNllNISTRATT'VE:
The SpUkane Valley 1'olice Departme.nt ariended a quarterly traiivng session with ehe coinmand
staff of Valley Firc. This was a first meet at what wil] eventually be a linkage of trauung issues
~ between thE two cieparUnents. 1'olice and Fire command staff' are attempting to bridge any
diffcrenees in understaiieling of prcac.eclures between the two agencies, «+hieh will eventually lcad
tn an overall improvcd level of service to otir citizens.
We here at the SVPTa are also inoving forward ui the pilot program nauied "BEAST", which is
the name of our newly automated har-coded property and evidence manageme.nt system. All of
the SVPD officers havc been trained and are now utiliring the s}rstem io plaee, track and/or route
icems of evidence for examinacion. Tlvs streajnlined new process wiU eventually be utili°r,ed by
lhe SVl'll; the Spokane Police and the County Sheriff as the standard rnethod Por propcrty
mana°ement issues.
Janulry also brought around our quartcrly media meeting. 1 his meeting gives commanci staff and
local media a chance to sit doAql and discuss new topics, and also gives the media an opportunity
to talk about any specific issucs that have come up in our daily contacts ancUor response w
incidents and ciissemiilation of information.
1Alc also attended a"stakeholders" meetuig witt1 CFS (Children's Family Services) This is a
worl:ing group that is trying to improve levels of service in that division of CPS. Law
enforceizient and these social service providers worlc together ui many cases, aiicl tliis group is
facilitating a re.view of standards to provide a better result in tota) service to thosc affecced by the
~ many aspects of child abuse and neglect.
~
i
Fage 1
We alsd implemented a new series of traiiune for SCOPE volunteers and the importailt role that
these valuable peoplc play in ow "frant" line preculct desk, serviees. VVe held special classes ancl -
topical training to expand the kiiawleclge basc of those who serve our public upon thosc first
contacts at our lncal front counter. We are cnntinually amazed at the level of commitment from
these wonderful volunteers and thc asset that they are to our comrnunity.
Crime Check, the ineans f-ar citizcns to i-eport crimes, suspieious activity and tips to Spokane
Counfy law enforcement agencies for the past tlurty-four years; has undcrgone a si€nificant
restiucturino this last month. The 9-1-1 system will not change anci will continue to be the
principal means lo rep4rt Ernergencies or sunimon law cnforcement assistance for in-progress
law violations. The report-talcing function luio-wri as Crime Check will be renamed the Spokanc
Crime }2.eporting Ccnter, and its hours will changc from 24-hour to 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday
through Friday and $ a.m. to 5 p.m. Saturdays. There will be no report taking on Sundays or on
holidays. The new phone numbcr for filing non-emergency crime report5 will be 532-9266. The
Crimc Check website is also undergoing changes to reduce inconvenience la Spokane County
citizens. The types of crimes that can be reported over the Internet are being expancied, and lhat
report-tahitig function will remain a 24-hour service. The website wil] soon accept the follouing
reports: Stolcn Bicycle, Custndial Inierfcrence; Garage Burglary, IIarassinent, Lost Property,
Tlieft, Threats, TrESpassing, Malicious Mise•hief and Vehicle prowling. Residcnts without home
coniputers can find them at shcrifPs S.C.O.P.E. stations, police C.O.P.S. stations, and all area
libraries. The new web addres.s for the Spokane Crime I2eporting Center is
Nv\,N,xv.spokanecrimereportingcenter.org.
~
COM~%TiJ\iITY-Olt[EiV I:ED POLTCTiNG:
Reserve Deputies: "1"he Spokane County Sheriff s Office wants to expand its reserve deputy
program. A Rescrvc Acadeiny is scheduled eo begin February 28. Flpplicauts must undcrgo
recruit processing which iricludes a background cheek, interviews, and physical and
psychological tests to determine their eligibility. Reserve deputies help enhance cominuiuty
safety wtule perfonning a variety of law enforcement fuiictions for tlie sheriff's office. The
currcnt Reserve Utut is 28 strong and periorms thousands of hours a year of volutiteer duties.
OPFRATIONS
Valley Bash Leavcs One. Hospitalized, Two Others Injured: One man was hospitalized -Mth a
stab wound i.n his chest and rivo ottiers were treated for minor head injuries after a New Year's
Evc bash went aw7y in the Spokane Valley. Two men at the scene had head injures, ane with a
gasli on the baek af his liead and the other with large welts to his forchead. At tlie hospital, a
30-year-old male was admitted wiih a lcnifc woutid to the chest. IIe was taken to surgery arid
was listed in stable condition. Officers arrested suspect aiicl hooked him ineo the Spokane
County Jail on a fclony charge of Fust Degree Assault. T'hc knifc was not rccovered; bui the
shavel and a laeee rock used to break out the front windows were seized as evidence.
Request For Tr•ip To Jail Granted: Spokane Valley Folice anested a 30-year-old woman after
she punched an officer tivho declined to take her to .jail. He reconsidered fallo4ving the assault
and granted her request. Officer Boiuie}r and olher oFficers were dispatched to 4th and Bradley `=Page 2
, on a"trouble unaiown" call in which a complainant reported awoman yclling. They
encouniered thc woman, who obviously had been clrilil:ing and -who demaiided to ve taken to jail
because she had "done a bad thing." She declined to say what the bad thing was, but repeatcd
numerous times that she wanied t0 go to jail. NN'hen Bonney didn't immediately granl her
requESt; tlie woman attempted a half-hearied kick at his shins. Then she got serious and punched
him with her full body weight in lvs upper right arni. The nFiicer arrested her for assault and
placed her in the back scat of his patrol car where she imnlediately began kicl:.ing the windows.
Offcer l3onney drove the woman ro.jail without suffering any vehicle damage and booked her
on the felony assault chdrge.
VVanted Felon Takes Officer For R'ild Ricle: A wajlted felon draggcd a Spokane Valley Yolice
officer wilh his car about 50 yards, then fled the scsne and crashed the vehicle a short distance
awav.
Officer Sean Walter was sent to Carnahan and Fifth after a passerby reported a car parked in
the roadway with its driver passed out betund the wheel. Walcer arrived and spatted a 1984
Honda Prelude partially bloelcing the souihbound lane. The car was run.ning and the driver's
window «=as doARi. There was a rnale behind the wheel anci a female passeuger, both of whom
appearEd to be passed out or sleeping. Walter awokc the male and he inuuediately becaine
uncoaperativc. His eyes were water}J and blondshot, and he claimed he had no identification.
I-Ie gave the officer a name that was not ui the police or Dept. of L-ieensing records systems.
While the driver was moving arounci, he exposed a wallet and driver's license in his frent pocket.
I-Ie re1`usetl to show the officer the license and appeaxed to be preparing to drivc off. Waiter
opened the-driver's deor and took hold of thc suspect's shoulder, attempting to renieve him from
the car, but realized the man was belted in. The driver hegan pulling away at low speed with thc
o~ficer walking beside thc open door still trying to coax tvm out of the car. 'Che suspcct suddenly
sN,verved the c.ar left toward a fenec. Waltcr believed the quick and deliberate move was intended
to swipe him o£i' the side of the car with thc fcncc. He tried to push off from the car, but the door
swung closed and trapped his hand bEtween the door aud doorframe. Walter tell onlo his back
and was dragged abOut 50 yards beforc he could breal: free. I-ie contuiually sliouted at the driver
while being dragged that he wa.s gaing to be run ovcr if the suspect did not stop the car. When
the officer fell away, he saw the car continue easc on Fifih co MeKinnon where it stoppcd. He
raii back to his patrol car aid drove up io the Honda, which had left the roadway and crashed into
landscaping and a Fence.l'he female passcngcr was standing next to the car wilh her hands raised
in the air. She told the of6cer that the driver had ntn away. The suspect left his "vallet on t,he
front seat of ttie car and Walter quickly iclentified him. A check through police records showed
that the suspect had an outstanding felony warrant for Escape froiti Community Custody and a
nlisdemeaalar Spokane Municipal Warrant for Refusal lo Cooperate. Also inside the cai- were
numernus items of clrug paraphemalia such as syringes, brass screens, glass drug pipes and
containerS x-vith white residue. `I"here also was a checkbook Uelonging ia a Cemale ather than ehe
fcmale passenger; aiid a man's wallet reported siolen in a L7ccember theft incident.
`Valter was noi seriously injured during the incident. The suspect was evenCually captured
ancl booked into the Spokaiie County Jail.
_ West VaIley Studcnt Arrested For Bomb Threat: VJcst Valley School Resource Deputy AiIdy
~ Bueli arrested a 1 S-ycar-old Spokane Valle}° I-Iigh School student afier the teen wrote a bomb
tlueat on aschool bathroom stall.
Page 3
The incident began when the suspect scrawled, "I'm going to blow this (cxpletive) school to
bics" and "This school sucks" on a bathroam stall. The facility was eventually cvacuated witli
sludcnts being tal:en by bus to West Valley High School. Tauring the evacuation; school officials
anci Spokane Valley Police searched the -facility. They found 5everal unattended backpacks and
called in Ueputy J.P. Melton and his Fxplosives °1 rackuig K-9 "Logan" (Shared resource) to
assist in the search. No weapons or explosives were found. SRD Of.ficer J3uell located and lifted
fingerprints at the site of the threat, and he and administrators compared the autlior's handwriting
to samples from potential suspects. 1"hey determined the 15-ycar-old miglit have ,vritten the
threat, anci school aduiicustratprs callecl him in for interviews. He denied any involvemcnt.
However, the teen wcnt home and e.pnfessed to his fattier. The studeiit inclicatecl he never
intendccl the message la be taken seriously. He saici he felt it wonld be reported and then erased
by janitorial staff.
Officer Buell said School .Resource Deputies, school officials and law en1'orcement in general
take such chreats seriously, aiid each and every one will be tliorouglily investigated. J-Ie said
arrests would be made when warranted.
NOIL: SeveraJ arrests of students were made in 2004 after school officials at Central Valley
High School discovered similar threats writtEn on bathroom walJs there.
llrug Detcctives 1)eal Drug llude Detcntion: With a'warrant based on a months-long
investigation ui wlvch undercover operativES made IIiultiple pwchases of marijuana from a
suspect, detectivcs assigned tn the SheriFl's investigativc Support Unit (shared resource) raided
a Spokane Valley home and arrested the 27-year-old resident for both llelivery and I'ossession of
Marijuana. The suspeet was tak-en uito custody at 6is home's slider door. He had a loaded Glock
.45-caliber pistol at his feet, but did not reach for it during the arrest. As the Search progressed,
the "small aznount" of marijuana initially seized by ISU detectives turned into ane anci a half
pounds.
'Vallcy Man Assaults Officer: A 33-year-old man was arrestcd for 1 hird Degrce Assault aflcr
he kicked a Spokane Valley Police officer during an arrest a[ Sprague and University.
Officers were callecl to the McDonald's re.staurant after the suspect d*rabbed onto a vehicle in
the drive-tlv-ough lane and bcgzn screamulg that its driver had shot people. The motorist told
of`ficers he had never seen the suspect bcfore, but that he was afraid the suspect was going to
forcibly enter his car.
`Vhen officers arrived, they found the siispect still screanung and apparently lugh on some
substanee. He refused to obe_y affieers' eommands ancl rolled onto his back with his feet cock.ed
bac:lc as if ready to kick tllem. Officcrs uscd a taser to cootrol the suspect, laut he wa5 still able
to kick Qfficer Greg Lance, taking some skin off his lower leg. Although the off cers were able
to contTnl the suspect; he coiltinued to struggle and fight as he was sccured in thc patrol car.
Officcrs discovered the suspect was artned with five different stabbing instrumenls. Officer Eric
Werner clrnve the suspect to a do\Nqitnwn hospital to have his levcl of intoxication checkcd and
then drove him to the Spok-cuie County Jail for booking on the felony charge. Vfisdemeanor
counts of Harass►nent aiid Disorderly Conduct are pending.
;
Page 4
2005 JANUARY CRIME REPORT
Jan.2005 Jan.2004
BURGLARY 65 60
FORGERY 49 42
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 62 59
NON-CRIMINAL 84 69
PROPERTY OTHER 96 143
RECOVERED VEHICLES 26 23
STOLEN VEHICLES 37 41
THEFT 158 201
UIOBC 0 0
VEHICLE OTHER 1 4
VEHICLE PROWLING 86 83
TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 664 725
ASSAULT 97 58
DOA/SUICIDE 17 8
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 54 58
HOMICIDE 0 0
KIDNAP 1 2
MENTAL 36 26
MP 11 16
PERSONS OTHER 102 140
~ j R088ERY 4 7
~ TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 16 13
TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 338 328
ADULT RAPE 2 1 '
CHILD ASUSE 19 14
CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 8 10
SEX REGISTR.ATION F 1 1
INDECEPVT L18ERTIES 1 1
CHILD MOLESTATION 2 8
CNILD RAPE 3 6
RUNAWAY 31 35
SEX OTHER 18 10
STALKI NG 5 1
SUSPICIOUS PERSON 22 26
TOTAL SEX CRIMES 112 113
DRUG 94 81
ISU OTHER 0 0
TOTAL !SU 94 81
TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 182 312
TOTAL REPORTS RECElVED 1,390 1,559
( 1~.. /
Y~`~- } ~ ~ ,1 q ~ ~ ~ Gtanite
.~o `J,
Ro 17, I~Nw
L~ ,;-t__ ~ ~¢.r c ~Queen r e~'t -
' : ~ ~ - ~ ~ `°I ; m a • •
~ a~~ey zr~ i ~a ` r ~t1et zleY
Hero
Pr ~
ctt tZich aolI• a~
c
r
ii~ ~ J' h-tp Q:t' 7- ~ r _lD-
7 - sU
~ -
mT _~ei~_- 9 !
R9C- . r~n a I i 1~ ~
7~ ~ ' - a- Kie ian wf
~ on
f ,c ~G1a5S _ _ - I _ • i ~ S'~-- ~ - ~ ---F- --1 ° m ~
13, l • !gr . / ~ ~ti-i ~I-! ~b~ertv - _ , n~p ~ ~ ~ k~ 'o y ~ m I m I ~
uylid U - m-~S ~ ti9ir'~taeau ~ ~ Eu fld~~ ~~oi'~ -[uGlid ~ I
Fredsrick HredECf ---r
T
.7 Bke,ve
~
m. ~ ~eke e
jh4arir~,~t~= ~ ~.1 'etta~ ~
0n19orreN 2 ~
~Knox I ~ ~c` Ada s Id
h4 ri ~ ry~ Indlana f Q ~
- , Indiana G)
' --z- T. Ni7ra r ~ -
F- ~~e August ~ ~ '~-i I ~Aission ~vSiss on ~ 6 ° m ~ ~ a Q
A1ission ~ 1~1ission ~b13kwel - ~.11 ~ ~ N.
SIt1 l0
M ~o{ T/~°~ I • ~
~I Qy ~SIN1A ~ p ~ ~ m
~Boc~ne M. Stia m r f Boo e t'"+ ~
Shar~~ ~f^t, t-• C ~ , 21 1 f
~ < JY ~ ; 1 ?L ~ ~ ~ `~1 ~s M allors ~ ~ a ~11~1!~ Dcw ` m ~'~r ~ N Ca4a1 0
Broadway • a-ncP J ~ - P. ng-Fie
~ ~ ~ ~ mI -A °k ~ 1nffoi~pp.
. v ~ w
~ hRai
A
r~ -ar- ~N ~
~ - ~ _ ~/~ny`Q b•~ co~~d ~-1
e
~ 1..-r-- -t- ~ .~1.t
V'
~Pc~tC~fc l.~~~~' Q m rd [ _ ` 211 d-~ ~ y tn Qi~ ~ o , 2nd =
~.~.~~?:_4th ~ 4€h o 4th
~Sqf~l.t ' 2 ~ fti.r ~Sth.~-~1~5th-i,6ll~ `_i~-
> 8 ) ~
o+---' v> f
~ i ~ Bth~- i 1o: 8lh `c~~ ~'a~"~ rn
0 Cs.L-~_9fh ~ .HU4: m g ti '7 2. i~ 91h
i ~ lOlh~ - k ~ 44 ~aEn _ r-~
9, r,
~
P Fal+~„ th i41h ~
I 4h 3 ~r`' -i--~- Im 16ih n' 17th= ~u~ 1~t t~ _ ~t6t - -g_~
~ ! 7 ~t,~" E3Sh ` ~ B ~ 1- - ~ 3"jc~°~
8 a ; -.~mm{; ~181h ~o~~ : i 19tfi 201f --T 91h 'b e l~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ • ' i • ~~:c i i S ; . Vo L=23 I22t~f ~
~"3~Y
' 21_ >C~n1 ~ zdth ' ~,_,,p`. . 24th~
-.'m ~ 25 - .
~
K== (D
a 30f/i 4 ic ' w i I ~jl ~fQ a 30th = m
#-29ihL ai NVI ~31st 32nd ~3: mL32nd
_ 31st ° 7 b( ; ';`.I -'~,~'_-`hCu: ,
w 351~-r°
;
2h@~ T o~ l 1~ ~CD-1I m ` I 36th
~ n -
35UtL- v ~ ~ 3711i ~ `•'3t3ll 379
n ~ (h'o~.~,• 1 `O~~ x Stolon
7
}~37E m mS to 401h -.:•-_BeIkE Ten vehiclos
c/7. t• S
3
I ,.43ref43 m
1~ 441h_ 441h i O t
.''~y C... rrre ~ r =-L{v-~, i~ti~t~ l 0 4ciQi_ o^ -4
+ ~r4~d" ie _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m - ~ a '~a5c a~~ e ~ I c~ C~-a. Low
M Medium
~ C7kJen+Sa?re ~ l-- J.,~_ i, ~ A Hi9h
-5it1 ~54'ithJy ~~.1 1i19
" ,57u► }_°.e~a'v~k,,_ SUSPECT
;""i"
Dec 2004 - Jan 2005 Stolen Vchicle Hotspots MapProduced:9February 2005
' i"
~
~--i- mI• 1~] ~ \v-1. I • -i .
oo ~ -v Gra~ite
F2Zr~vdrlm
I S ~ $~Ar19G11 c?p t~ ;i7_ - i.
`==t- n SP ~gs y~~~d ? 2 . ~ ~ m r uoen,✓ s ~ ~~K ' Tce~'t -
n
ro \Py z~ ~ Princetaai' = a 5 c { 1 ~ , ey~`X
L-v r ~ p rn NGHesie a ~a^ t r-
J
~ I 1~-,t, -rFleroy Tm~~'~
P nGQEO ~ f° a 1'
.S~
~ - '7---i _\~1 \ I 1(~1.C7'..'~4i 1 • " ~
= R~c h:~ ~ ~ S ~ S n c, Ricfi f~~
~ `I - o` , ~~-~og~3,e~,, I f ~ ~ •ci.-L-~-` ~ , ~ ~ : ~t ~ ; _ D 3 !
I ~ ~ - ~ = I
T tN ~
o ' ~.~~f~yqj ~ ,~5 ` 7 \ KE ~ h " ~ r I~ ~ 1
Ik
m ~ 5
~ Fredcrick ol_... MirBbeau ' Eu !id uclid
~ uc~id ~
8uc~~key Crace. 1 9u<:ke e~ ace
t~-4- ICttPi
~ L~L on
'L - n o~n r~ z.x.GT~ Knox~ ~ A9onigot~~ ~ ~',Indiana . ~
ti~• O' ~j li~diana Q ~
~
~ r ~ -~-I rZ
r>
hSisslon J~.,~-"~ Pv1i~~i n ~'tA~~ u'F' h~:~`•" ~ ?'la'Yiss6qr~~ ~ r !t Qa ~ f btisslon~ sI ~ ~ ~[~'r• ~ ~6
~n~ Md~wcl ' !
. g b- ~ --1 ~ a -
li ; ~ ~eg k~ l a ~ r9
~Btlone t~ ~i w to ~ ~,o a._~ /~.~'~s--S}~
_ ~
? ~ L3ao ~~Desmel 3 jT~- cr-~ -Caf~Jdo m
Catal o T
i° C0 ~b ~ . Ii t r
`
( $ ~
- ~ - -
Alki—
Qli~e
Va]leyrw °
"d ixon f ~ 1~a"~ sn .-r o~--r m m co o1~F - ~ a
Ivtain
, .
~
!
c PP s? _ . ~,~pr-+ . ~ • (n 2nd`~~ -2nd
_Pa~ifC 4 ~~~~?~i ~ ~d cu- 4tli ~ 0 41h~
1`~
~ Sih-Iru_ e'T~' '1
I~ g ~61h:
F~ ~-L_r t y th ~p, - =71f1 N r-- ath T~m; 8th~ i ~1 84tt w E¢~ ( m
~o7t f~tl ~,N•Y • lth
_ 1
it_ C~ Dth- , SQiEi o~ ~ ~ rr a ~.,hy c ~ ~m~.~, ~ ,7
-D
~
. m~ ~'a' _ i21n ~.,i. cn ~ r 'L
Z ~
ialit ~,b ~ 3 w17
i~ Q ~ e-tif
- ~ It~ ~8
Jf T m ~;r g g= ~ .1 iti-2C) -a9lh 9tH.Lg 1 -l.~ .I ,L t.• • ~2 I
~~{*L
~ ~ [b-~ ~5~ ~ .T ~ ~l ~~Q / ~
L~~i322 Ci 27,iid-n ti~~
!
~21 sl C '~o th. ~ 1 =124 th 24th,
~-~m - Jennia~ ~th~ rt
_ 2- ,~r h• "CN.Ir.~~rr~•~ ~ , j • ra y4 i `v
;
2 th !r
ltf- I3t]th - TT I a 3oln = rn
tr e._ 1 ~ ~•T _ ` J~ m ~ 32ttd
-29iht- ~S3r~'Ul fi; ~ w 32rii -o
..Zn-t_:_ _ : 31si ' ~ t,M -'~__t1~4 35fh ~r~ 3
\ ~ 3fitlti ` 3601 ,
37t 38th -11. ~ ♦ 0
3 ~ y 40fh .m. 5~
~
~ mLTE2lI8 1~f;1T~ lZ ~
' Tretllc
N- 3 calisi«,
~ p
g
! Ir~ r,q'kr o.
43r~ o~ , ~6a1# h4th ~
hp J r ~
. ty h_j f'I'- 44th v _ J-~ - clla VJsI~
c._ , ari e = 4 1 h o I a 4 ~ 0
- - ~ ~ ~ cp F ~,a~ ~ Low
~ F~a a L a~ c d
0. ED Medium Low
. ; l~ Medium
S71h Of~ - ~~tr^ ~4,~.~ ~t~ •Ce Moha~ ~ ? p ` ~ • f _ '
M High
January 2005 Traffie Collision Hotspots Map Produced: 9 February 2005
iwbl)I`' JOS2 ~ FnrKe~ 1 ~ W i
.
-L-- ~a~ C~ _a ~c r~ Sanson ,.70-._
i__ f- 3 t r -ri a r
~
~ -
~ x { . ld~
~ ~n. r'
f' i - ! _ I
~
- r II 1~ ~ eyI c~
I mi 00`~ Zf ~ PrinC0tOr1 S ~ m i<~ _
1
_3 cu ~ ~ i] ~ c~
~-L__ Y I°'~'.~ • n y m m RrCit
L •S'' , ' ~ - F___ X .%0~~, 3 .
° In`3 f r1'~• ll Cm~_--- ; ~ 1~ Q
-n 't -..__,^~•.r~hga ~ -r- Kie a h
~
_1iI~'~ss-- 'f ~ - • o~ z a~ i mo.
t-t-'-:~ fi4 ~ `~~x• o
~
C~ '1.. a t4"
u Eu e _ucl3cl
f~lirabeau ~ ~
Frederick..
~ y 9ucko e8ucke e
_Buc ~ IGrace-~
~ n
T ietta~ a - -Y
0.4
i~ .fack's ~i y~--
r
1 E~mi I~lo r' ~ ~ I-P-Aans ~Id ~ "!f
~ m}~_ • ~ ~ ~L~ V(nox I ~ ~iaria - ~ litidiana
`L ~ Indiana
I.r
,v t ~D~~~ ! - t~or~=- r ~ • 1 _ ~-o ~ ~ m ~ D m
_~:r -}"'~s h 8~~ ~-~c~ G acrA•--- r.._,~,.,~; :.~'~°`~.~.-y1 ~ ! ~ ~ r ~ ~,ri k_+
~~~ssio~iti
!f ~ 3> o. c
o G° 1u4ission r - ~.-a~ SO J A~tiss on ~ m m I
r ~ T
Mi sior ~ z-Slnto "a~g'0 _
rW v-' "S.
' Soone~~ ^Slfi~tu„s~'m siBr`p ^~~ol~ "i = i B
lti7
~ , - - 1 .IP~ c~ r el ~ - ~ { Desmtlt
m_ JCatel o
T~ll
~ ~ _Broaday ..°Y' ' k~l a '.~~AIYi"~-SA~ng(iekJ ;Alki,__; ~~Q-y,c~•, ~aY _
Qlfve y AIki ~ za n a11eywa~ ~v-~a~~e ;vay I m- I m ov+tey i I ~
~N,
x. ~ r.M1at ~
i' f17 1~,~ ~
1 t~ ~ ~iA'e►~ ~ f~ ,.~'.~SP : ~-X-- 7
P~(a9 ~o ~ L_ I- ~
}
~
st_n pleway - 1s a^ 2nd-- - 4th
rj 3d'C~ ~4 1a(Yt I ~i Z
~7c t}j -
4
fL- -4th T,` c~ _ . 0:11 % o ~ 3 _ n
7th '~8J T 8th
i3ar~n ~ . S~ 9EhIc ~ ~,,fi•
s~(31h ot]i ~ -O. SQtEi m 9th vt ~h ~p!- ~~h c ~ !~oi:~;
-r
~ ~Pr~tt.~ - --~-1-1 th b I - 6c • . -
-~-~2th;
~i~ 4lh ~ I t i L Go 3 ~ e .c ' ~
~ 11• tti- 141h c '
J~- - 7 • _ '1'M m C ~ ~ ~b Q' V+. C
~l161r- i 17, a_ -1~ I- r
16!j- ~'o~ ;m1 1"~~
~ah--
T 18111 h
4
~ ~ p. ~ ) ~ ~ A 1 , ZDt~ti~
4
~
! ~n I ° • 5~ ~ ' `T ° . po~22nd 4 tii '~r~~S~ e3r'~3rd T 24ihl
Jennio'- A-1
Qa
.;N fi;_ gm ~ 1 c~a 271h D, ~ .?*6lN ~ ~ `c ~~'k w;
25t1t zo _ 1n;~'ie4v_ :~y ~ ~ - ~
t - m .-~S~'.• ~ i _
0t7, w
d La~, ra. Ti J~, _ 301h g~cI
r~~1 32.d ~ ~,ef, 32nd
3 o ~ .~u~ ~ --1--- - ~ l - -
-n a°'-t 351h7 ! ~f • ~ - ~
~v-, C~~'>: ~ 3str, J o
3I ,
1h~m: 31811
~ii
c~ ~ ~ ~ l U lsln ro,4, ant,
~~--t-~~ t ~-~a~_~. r `•r'; • '~l--t- ct' 'a'-. E3elleTerr~
L {t { f ~ l1 'D II~ J vj S - 'S ~ { I ~~`iltl ~ i Canmorclal
C~~,.~ r.~_ . e ~ Burglary
t E y ~ ~ N y ` ; ~z ~ ~ojt+~j1.c ~ - > > 8211 9 3 i c -
.~?S1 ,d3rd43rd m i,+ 3 0~ C I _r~ O
441h
4~ .-.8gld Vf ~ l p,
7 l
h?arie 44th V 46th o
-~i
L~!ly
~I-~, (D Fm m °'Ftif ma . p~' I ~,`L d9E t n CD
a ~sLow
n~iaire ~ i
` , 5 _ ~ , _ • ~ r1 , 7- IS , i
Sth R a M Medium
~ .571h~5C~ih? rC'~ 'G' •rye ,rIMOhaw' ~ Hi9h
'r I - 1
, o a-'~ i a~~b6 Map Produced: 9 February 2005
° ~~r- ~ January 2005 Commercial Burglary Wotspots
^R..Lt
~
~o Jose z.~ 0 •
. W o ' ~'--gnt~i f c . ~ork ~ , ' - ~
171 -t-1' T
< 2 ~ueen
0 lPy:;w
~ I ~ vaA ~ ~i Jg tivslle ley ~H-y',~~ '~i ~
R.~r nceto ~ ~ fI _ _ ~n
ri rm_' ~ cv
,4yi ~.--~-~--r'-
T ry y ~ f ~7_,.•'( _L~.~' a ~c
Kie ian .n I~ ~0
0 I ; =
~ ~ ...-ti. - f~ti~~l~ SS ~ \ • ~ ~ y O ~ 3 fp C, ~UC~Id ~
~_L 1 ' e I' a 1 O ~ ~
Mir~abeau Eti lid I~
i sa ~ ~ - -r. ~ 1J:`,~~
~ L<<~~ Frederick V k
GT..'ela~' ,n~
I Bucke eeu~4eYe
=GFaae T ~
A `
tutariF~ta= .T 't-~-~;- ~v ; ~-`I - _ c~ _ ~t _ :S~( a' ° r•;; i_; ~ ~
~it
, '~~{-'•-1"'a~•
-C~ , iti I -r rry'
o ~ ~ -.Kr-
-t- tv
ox
~
ana
°t-' ' oa~i~
w tldfa d ~ , ~-Nora
on o ~ rn ~ • ~ o,
~ t - ~ ~
i iiwt ll ~L~ :I~9iSSiu • _ ~ ` ~I~~ ~ ~ ~!L ~i ~ , ~y-? ~-_n:'=.._ io r ~ i ~ ' N'Cita
h0i55ioai ~ Mission e! i
i Sharp ~ Boo ~ ~ '
ne
! m 3 z~ ~2 Desmet
~ c~~-m/ , _ j a ~ ~ t- ° n_ _ io~C~klo N "Cata o- 5~_ Catal o
Br'~~1~c~T ca E x O~d~ ~y~ pnngiue
= aki kio ~ e w G u /
) I ' ~ Y al!¢~ voaY ~
~ fytxdn m
r~ ~n ~4arn~ • S~r~F1~J .~y~ r _ m iuCf'~d~ ~
cD
v I ~ ~ ^ ra e n =z:~ u k ' ~
~ ~s~
~ A ~~C~~ , 2nif
-Pa~C~ ic L -2n ,~i~ d,; y ' - ~ 3rd
-t
~8th r ~ ~lh f c~- is~ ~
~R m
N rrls
t-
~ C ~ ~~9?hSr
~o_t 1 th~ - ~ ttt d~ r- < ~ •
1v~ ~
~
I c tt~ • o _ -r--
PF~c
c t~ J~zcfi -
w
r~ . 3 c~c
~121n 14th ~ ~
w
~-1~
p 6t-~L~~iZ- y~
6i81tt 1 -\C3 -~°l~`~,'~~ '~i O-m ~$fh-~iD ~ e.~ .
ji .
20t11-,_,~ 911i~f ~
-18ih ~ sa , •'fi - 7`r~-~'~-onil t
` 1~` < E1~`, 3id 22nd Lv'S1 , ~4~ 3rd
~q , ~ ~ . 2n th I
,
2.4th T-
~ - 1 171 st '?I~~~ m r'~~ i ,
~m ~ ~ i'-~- - ~ Jettn m ~ZvJi' vakYR ~ d
th 25th 7 ~~'~a~% `r ~z~ ~ti~.~ -4" •t ~ ~
~ 1'bm~; ~ m
1 SI 3pth = m
^
r~ ~ . ~ r1 ~3 1 ~~Y32 nr~
~ m. -f_ 31 sl , -n ~ 3~~
t- 3~'..` m
w 2 ~ ~
~ff7 36th~3
~ ~ ~ 10 4tf1 ~ 37.t~i A ~ RcaidnMial
-9 ~
A !u
7tli ,fi U~ 01fi
4~ f cn Bell~i Te rre v I Bur0lary
C :7 m r. ~!''ui1 • ~ ~ ~ •,,t r, th
1st 1 I m o ~ ~ ~ %-•al• S(`i To,o~,~. ~.c ~ `'I ' ~ - ~ Ball ' p ~ , Cl
I1 r1 43rd I m ~ ~ ~
Yr 411ih 9; c
.i'.~. I~T~f~'~- 44Ih - 4Ft~ ~o-i ~1 4 1 1~ttL~ a ~
0 fi~th o a ~ ~ -
i°~
.
t-~-ii~td ~ -~~s oa"a0 e 0 ~
i • Low
Pre °Nvman K~1 ~ ~
C~;,nr,_ ,~r,~, ar _Fe~'_' rahe ~ ~a~ ~
~ j a ~Medium
~ ' ~~h'~~ • R ~ ~ 3 ~ High
7U1-~~.1 ~ery` ~'%~L., ~ SUSPECT
° °-5 ;""fo8 January 2005 Residential Burglary Hotspots Map Prodtx[:d:9 February 2005
~
r-Spokane Valley Fire Department
2005 Incident Response Information
~
.
r .
. ~ -
i
-
Spokane County Fire Protection District #1
2005 Response Information
Spolcane Valley Fire
Geportment
Jan 01 - Jan 31, 2006Year
INCIDENT TYPE bo Date
11SfF Structure Fire Single Res onse 35
11-W Workin Fire 5
13-5 13-S Vehicle Fire 9
14UH Brush Fire 1
15S Trash Fire 0
18-5lF Alarm S stem 69
31-A/B EMS Alarm EMT 287
31-ClD EMS Alarm Paramedic 325
31-F 2nd alarm EMSIMsss Casuait U
35-F Extrication 3
36-F Water Rescue 0
37-F Tech Rescue 0
40-1 Hazmat Investi ation 3
40-F Hazmat Fult Res onse t
464A/6 Auto Accident - Unknown In'uries 71
46-C/D Auto Accident - Life Threats 3
50-S Service Call 18
Total 830
~ ~ . TdaF :pabr'~ ~c9an DiNrfd I I
i . . `
\ .
~
`i
Spokane Valley Fire Department
2005 Response Information
Spokane Valley Fire
Department Year to
City Of Liberty Lake Fire District # 1 City Of Spokane Date
INCIDENT TYPE Year to Date Year to Date Valley Year to Date Millwood Jan 1-Jan 31,2005
11-5 Structure Fire Single Response 0 6 19 0 25
11-F Structure Fire 0 1 8 1 10
11-W Working Fire 0 0 5 0 5
13-S Vehicle Fire 0 1 8 0 9
14-UN Brush Fire 0 0 1 0 1
15-S Trash Fire 0 0 0 0 0
18-S Alartn SystemSingle Response 1 1 7 0 9
18-F Alarm System- Full 16 2 42 0 60
31-A1B BLS EMS Alarm 4 21 259 3 287
31-CID ALS EMS Alarm T 27 286 5 325
31-F 2nd alarm EMSJMass Casualty Q 0 0 0 0
35-F Extrication 0 1 2 0 3
36-F Water Rescue 0 0 0 0 0
37-F Tech Rescue. 0 0 0 0 0
404 Hazmat Investigation 0 0 3 0 3
40-F Hazmat Full Response 0 0 1 0 1
46-A!B Auto Accident - Unknown Injuries 0 13 56 2 71
46-C!D Auto Accident - Life Threats 0 0 3 0 3
50-S Service Call 0 1 15 2 18
Total 28 74 715 13 830
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Approved Minutes
Council Chambers - City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
January 13, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
Planning Commission Chair Crosby called the meeting to order at 6:30
p.m.
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Commission, audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
III. ROLL CALL
Fred Beaulac - Present Bill Gothmann - Present
Bob Blum - Present lan Robertson - Present
David Crosby - Present John G. Carroll - Present
Gail Kogle - Present
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Ms. Sukup asked that the Spokane Transit Authority presentation be
delayed until their representative arrives.
.
Commissioner Beaulac moved fhaf fhe January 13, 2005 agenda be
approved as amended. Commissioner Kogle seconded the motion.
Motion passed unanimously.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Commissioner Robertson recommended that a change be made on Page
5 of the December 9, 2004, meeting in the "For the Good of the Order"
section. The fourth sentence should read: "Commissioner Robertson will
speak at the December 17th Cham6er meefing on the toprc "Season of
Sharing."
It was moved by Commissioner Gothmann and seconded by
Commissioner Blum that the minutes of fhe December 9, 2004
Planning Commission meeting be approved as amended. Motion
passed unanimously.
Commissioner Carroll was not present at the last meeting when the
November 18th minutes were approved as presented. He proposed
replacing the existing summary of his thoughts in the fourth paragraph on
Page 3 with the following: "Commissioner Carroll is greatly concerned
that if our City does not respect past decisions or is not consistent in its
land use clecisions, businesses or other investors may not feel confident
enough in our government to cominif fo long term development plans."
!t was moved by Commissioner Carrol/ fhat the November 98, 2004
minutes be amended to contain his suggested correction.
Commissioner Robertson seconded the motion. Motion passed
unanimously.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
Commissioner Crosby explained that during his term of office he will act
as Chairman and Commission meeting facilitator. As such, he will direct
and help the Commission move the meeting forward, but he will not
propose motions or vote on motions unless there is a tie vote.
VI11. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
The Planning Commission will meet with City Council on Tuesday,
February 1, 2005 from 6:00 - 9:00 p.m. for a Joint Meeting/Study Session
on core values as they apply to the Comprehensive Plan. Deputy City
Manager, Nina Regor, will facilitate the meeting.
Ms. Sukup announced Ms. Alley's resignation, effective January 21, 2005.
The Commission and staff and wished her well in her new position as
Executive Assistant to the President at Spokane Community College. ,
Commissioner Gothmann moved that the Planning Commission
express their appreciation and commend Ms. Alley for her work. The
mofion was seconded by Commissioner Blum. Motion passed
unanimously.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
A. NEW BUSINESS:
The Commission delayed this section until representatives of the
Spokane Transit System arrived.
B. OLD BUSINESS:
Commission Consideration: Findings of Fact for 2004
Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Greenacres Area-Wide
Rezone.
Chairman Crosby recommended that the Commission decide upon
a method for handling the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and
Greenacres Area-Wide Rezone Findings of Fact.
A motion was made by Commissioner Beaulac to handle a/l Comprehensive P/an Amendment Findings together and the
Planning Commission fJlinutes Page 2
January 13, 2005
r~
Gr.eenacres Area-Wide Rezone separately. Commissioner
Kogle seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. McCormick presented a brief overview of the Comprehensive
Plan process to date. Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application Nos. 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, and 08 were presented to
City Council at a study session on November 30, 2004, and then
forwarded to first ordinance reading on December 14, 2004. The
ordinances were then forwarded to second reading on December
21, 2004, at which time the Council was advised by the City's
Deputy Attorney that formal Findings of Fact were required to be
formulated and signed by the Planning Commission. These
Findings of Fact will establish a written record of Planning
Commission recommendations. The Council remanded the
amendments back to the Planning Commission to review and sign
Findings of Fact, and set January 25, 2005, as the date to receive
the Commission's Findings.
Chairman Crosby requested comments from the Commissioners on
Findings of Fact for each Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application. No c4mments or changes were proposed.
~ Commissioner Gothmann moved that the Planning
Commission adopt the Findings of Fact and recommendations
for Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-01-04, CPA-02-04,
CPA-03-04, CPA-04-04, CPA-05-04, CPA-06-04, and CPA-08-04
as presenfed. Motion seconded by Commissioner Kogle.
Motion passed unanimously.
Chairman Crosby requested comments from the Commissioners
relative to the Findings of Fact for the Greenacres Area-Wide
Rezone Application REZ-17-04. Mr. Gothmann recommended
elimination of fhe word "from" from #6 at the top of Page 3, so it
reads: "The Commission heard significant tesfimony #rem in
scrpporf........"
Commissioner Beaulac moved to approve Mr. Gothmann's
amendment to the Findings of Facf for REZ-17-04.
Commissioner Robertson seconded the motion. Motion
passed unanimously.
It was moved by Commissioner Beau/ac, and seconded by
Commissioner Blum, that the Planning Commission adopt ihe
Findings of Fact and recommendation for the Greenacres
Area-Wide Rezone Application (REZ-97-04) as amended.
Motion passed unanimously.
Planning Commission Minutes Page 3
January 13, 2005
Continued Public Hearing: Stormwater Ordinance.
Ms. Sukup provided the Commissioners with an update regarding
the proposed Stormwater Ordinance. Planning Commission heard
public testimony at its last meeting on December 9, 2004, and
moved to continue the Public Hearing to January 13, 2005. Mr.
John Hohman, Senior Engineer, took the Planning Commissions
recommendations from the December 9«' hearing and incorporated
them into a revised ordinance. Some changes were also made by
the Deputy City Attorney.
The Planning Commission asked questions regarding aesthetics,
thresholds and property-owner responsibility for maintaining private
property drywells. Ms. Sandra Raskell, Associate Engineer,
assisted Ms. Sukup in responding to the Commissioners' questions
and concerns.
Commissioner Gothmann moved thaf the Planning
Commission recommend approval of Ordinance No. 04007:
"An Ordinance of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington,
establishing Section 9.08 Stormwater Management regulations
or the Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code, repealing
regu/ations in conflict, providing for severability and effective
date" to City Council. Motion seconded by Commissioner Beaulac. Mofion passed unanimously.
A. NEW BUSINESS:
Ms. Molly Meyers, Communications Expert at Spokane Transit
Authority (STA), introduced herself. Last year, STA was trying to
figure out how to cut services to match a potentially large budget
cut. This year, thanks to sufficient voter-approved funding, they are
working with neighborhoods, passengers, community groups,
planning commissions and stakeholders of every variety on a
revamped and improved system. Ms. Meyers handed out a copy of
the STA newsletter "Crossroads", Volume 2, Issue 5(December
2004-January 2005) which contained a draft of the STA's Draft
Long Range Service Plan.
Spokane Transit Authority has acknowledged that the Spokane
Valley has historically been underserved. That is why Ms. Meyers
asked to meet with the Planning Commission tonight. STA is
proposing an increase of transit service to the Spokane Valley
through the use of smaller buses, greater connectivity and more
frequent service on improved routes. She asked the Planning
Commission to review the draft plan carefully and provide STA with \
any comments or recommendations in the near future. A public
Planning Commission Niinutes Page 4
January 13, 2005
' hearing will be held in early winter 2005. STA Board approval of
the new service plan is anticipated for March 2005. A final plan is
slated to take effect September 2005.
Commissioner Kogle thanked Spokane Transit Authority for its hard
work on this draft long range service plan. Commissioner
Robertson commended STA for its work with the elderly and
handicapped citizens of the community.
B. OLD BUSINESS:
Continued Public Hearinq: Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application No. CPA-07-04.
Mr. McCormick provided the Commission with a brief overview of
this application, and introduced Ms. Raskell as the City's Public
Wor4cs representative who could answer questions. At this time,
the Applicant is requesting another continuation of the hearing to
February 10, 2005, in order to review documents that City Public
Works staff collected from various agencies. However, Planning
and Public Works staff members recommend denial of another
continuation as well as the proposed amendment. Mr. McCormick
reminded the Commission that hearing on this Comprehensive Plan
Amendment has already been continued to two previous meetings:
~ j October 14, 2004 and November 18, 2004.
After a brief discussion regarding how to proceed with the matter,
Chairman Crosby suggested that the Public Hearing be open to
further testimony, so the Commissioners can decide whether to
move forward or continue the hearing to February 10rn
Public Hearing for Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application
No. CPA-07-04 was opened at 7:30 p.m.
The Public Testimony section was opened at 7:32 p.m.
Commissioner Crosby asked participants to come fonrvard and
state their case within a reasonable time limit.
Todd Whipple, Whipple Consultinq EnqineerslApplicant.
13218 E. Sprague, Spokane ValleY, WA 99216
Mr. Whipple explained to the Planning Commission that the traffic
impact analysis his firm prepared for the City Public Works
Department was submitted in October 2004. It is a 500-page
document, and he is surprised by the lack of technical analysis
review done by area agencies before recommending denial of the
application. The Developer is seriously considering withholding a
significant amount of money from the PineslMansfield road project
because of these responses to the application. Mr. Whipple
Planning Commission MinLites Page 5
January 13, 2005
proposed a series of ineetings between now and February 10,
2005, in order to come to a clearer understanding with the City of
Spokane Valley Public Wor4cs Department, Spokane Valley Fire
District #1, and other public agencies who have responded to his
application.
There being no further testimony, the Public Testimony portion of
the hearing for CPA-07-04 was closed at 7:45 p.m.
Commissioners were concemed that the Applicant and Public
Works staff may not be fully prepared to conclude the hearing by
February 10, 2005. Both Mr. Whipple and Ms. Raskell assured the
Commission that they would meet regularly and be fully prepared to
conclude the hearing on CPA-07-04 at the February 10, 2005,
Planning Commission meeting.
A motion was made by Commissioner Gothmann to continue
Public Hearing on Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Application No. CPA-07-04 to February 10, 2005. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Kogle. All in favor of the motion:
Commissioners Beaulac, Blum, Gothmann, Kogle and
Roberfson. All opposed to the motion: Commissioner Carroll.
Motion passed 5-1.
Mr. McCormick and Ms. Raskell will work with Mr. Whipple to
provide him with the resources he will need to make his
presentation on February 10, 2005.
The Commissioners took a five-minute break between 7:50 and 7:55 p.m.
Public Hearinq for an Ordinance of the City of Spokane Valley,
Washington, establishing Section 7.09: Sign Regulations of
the Uniform Development Code, repealing Section 14.804
Signage Standards of the lnterim Development Regulations
adopted pursuant to Ordinance 03-0531nterim Developmenf
Regu/ations; providing for severability and effective date.
The Public Hearing was opened at 7:55 p.m. Ms. Sukup provided a
brief PowerPoint overview and update regarding the work of the
Ad-Hoc Sign Committee and its review and revisions of the existing
Sign Code Ordinance. She explained that although the committee
spent a great deal of time discussing Aesthetic Corridors and the
present moratorium on new Billboards, proposed revisions of these
topics will be held in reserve until the Valley's Comprehensive Plan
is adopted. At the December 9, 2004 meeting, the Planning
. Commission made several suggestions to clarify the Revised Sign
Planning Comrnission Alinutes Page 6
January 13, 2005
~ Code Ordinance. Those suggestions were incorporated into
tonight's discussion draft, as well as several changes
recommended by the Deputy City Attorney.
The Public Testimony portion of this hearing was opened at 8:11
p.m. Because he served as Chair of the Ad-Hoc Sign Committee,
Mr. Crosby turned the Public Hearing over to Commission Vice-
Chair Carroll so that he could answer Sign Code questions without
creating confusion.
Denny Yorkt S. 2617 McCabe, Spokane Valley, WA.
Mr. York served on the Ad-Hoc Sign Committee as a Spokane
Valley Business Community representative. He works for a chain
of grocery stores in the Spokane region. The Committee met every
two weeks between June to November, 2004. Meetings were open
to the public, and were posted on the City's website well in advance
of the meeting date. The "Definitions" section of the Revised Sign
Code Ordinance took five meetings to complete, and then the
Committee worked through the requirements and put them into
easy-to-read charts. One Committee goal was to assure that the
new City regulations would allow for continued economic growth.
Therefore, many of the revisions for signage pertained to B-2 and
greater zoning designations. He is satisfed that the Committee did
its best to provide a good set of signage guidelines, and asked that
the Planning Commission recommend the Revised Sign Code to
` City Council for approval and adoption.
_ Bob Boyle, Hanson Industriest 15807 E. Indiana, Spokane
Valley, WA.
Mr. Boyle asked the Planning Commission to approve this proposal
and get it to City Council as quickly as possible. He thanked the
Ad-Hoc Sign Committee for doing an "amazing" job. Signage is a
key component to business success, and the proposed Revised
Sign Code gives local businesses a matrix to work with.
Duane Halliday, 1015 E. Cataldo, Spokane, WA.
Mr. Halliday vdorks for Lamar Outdoor Advertising, and served as a
Sign Industry representative on the Ad-Hoc Sign Committee. He
believes that a great deal of thought was put into the proposed
Revised Sign Code, and asked that the Planning Commission
recommend it to City Council.
Vice-Chair Carroll submitted an email letter for the public record
from:
;
Planning Commission Minutes Page 7
January 13, 2005
Susan Scott, 2312 Bolivar Road, Spokane Valley, WA.
Ms. Scott wrote to urge the Planning Commission to accept the Ad-
Hoc Sign Committee's proposal. She believes that utilizing
monument signs as the primary source of marking business
locations is "not a real user friendly method". Ms. Scott believes
the Committee's proposal hits the right balance for signs in the
Spokane Valley.
There being no further testimony, the Public Testimony section of
the Public Hearing was closed at 8:20 p.m.
The Commission discussed specific questions related to Aesthetic
Corridors, Billboard Cap and Replace Policies, the reasoning for
sign location setback changes, wall sign size, murals, requirements
for signage support structures, and the wisdom/reasoning for a 36-
month deadline to remove obsolete signs.
Commissioner Robertson moved that the Planning
Commission forward a recommendation for approval to City
Council for an Ordinance establishing Section 7.09 Sign
Regulations of the Spokane Valley Uniform Development ,
Code, repealing Section 14.804 of the lnterim Development
Regulations, providing for severability and effecfive date and
amending of ihe Sign Regulafions. The motion was seconded
by Commissioner Kogle. All in favor of the motion:
Commissioners Carol, Kog/e, Gofhmann and Robertson. All
opposed to the motion: Commissioners Beaulac and Blum.
Motion passed 4-2.
Commissioner Gothmann believes that it is essential for the City to
have good signage, and he thanked the Ad-Hoc Committee for their
good work. He believes his concerns were met satisfactorily.
Commissioner Robertson pointed out a typographical error at the
bottom of Page 3, and recommended that the definition for "Use(s)"
be changed to read...... Insfitufiona! Semi-Public includes a
churchess, public park,........ Ms. Sukup agreed to make the
change before it is submitted to City Council.
Commissioner Blum agreed that the tables and the definitions are a
great plus, but he has a problem with lowering the distances
between signs and increasing the size of signs. He thinks it would
be nice if we have a clear and distinctive community.
Commissioner Beaulac thinks the proposed Revised Sign Code will
create more "visual spam" in the Valley. He was hoping to see the
Committee make more improvements on the County Sign Code. ,
;
Planning Commission Minutes Page 8
January 13, 2005
Commissioner Carroll warned that because this Revised Sign Code
doesn't address support structures, we may have people finding
"creative" ways to use support structures for signage purposes.
Chairman Crosby thanked the Planning Commission for its
consideration, and the Ad-Hoc Sign Committee for its hard work.
Public Hearing on the proposed Revised Sign Code for the City of
Spokane Valley was closed at 8:45 p.m.
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
Commissioner Beaulac will be unable to attend the Planning Commission
meeting on Thursday, February 24, 2005.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:50 p.m.
SUBMITTED: APPROVED:
Debi Alley, Administrative Assistant David Crosby, Chairman
Planning Cammission PAinutes Page 9
January 13, 2005
r- -1 NOTES
SFFCTAl., JOI~i rT WORKSHOP iVLi- ETiNC
SPOKA-NE VALLEY CITY CQUNCII,. AND
SPOK.4dNT VALLEY PLAi'NTNIlVG CONE'vIISSIO\°
February 1, 2005, 6:00 p.m.
Attendance:
Councilmembcrs Staff Planniog Cnmmissioncrs
Dians Wilhite, Viayour Taave Mercier, Cit:y Manager Bill Gothmann;
Rich Munson; 17eputy Mayor \'ina Regor, Deputy Ciry Mgr Tan Robertson
Dick Denenny, Councilrr►ember vlitrina Sukup, Comm. Dev. Dir. rred Beaulac
1vT.ike rlanigin, Councilmernber Greg IvfcCormick, LQngi Ranbe Planning iYlgr. Bob Blum
Gary Schirrimels, Couricilmember Scatt Kuhta, Lons RaungE Plt►nner Uavid Cr4sby, Chair
Steve Taylor, Councilrnember Ncil K.ersten, Public Works Director Gail Kogle
Mike Jackson, Ken Thornpson .
'1"om Scholtens, (3uilding Ufficial
Cary llriskell, I7eputy City Attorney
Chris T3ainbridge, City Clerk
Absent:
Mike.Deljletning, CoiuicilrnErrtbcr Joltir Carroll, Contmissioner
AGF.NllA 1'OYlC: Corc Valucs qs thcv Apn<<' to ihc Coniprchensive Plan
`9ayar Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and in preparation for one of the topics scheduled for
the February 12 council retreat, suggested Councilmenibers read the Association of Washinglon Cities
legislacive goals. Mayor VJilhite also reminded Councilmembers to send their Public 1.nformaCion Offeer
infiorrnation to Nina as soon as possible. Mayor Wilhite explained that this is a joint meeting with mcmbers
of the Flanning Comnlission; and that the meeting is takino place on the open floor to better engage in topic
discussions.
Deputy City Manager Regor explained that the purpose of tonight's meeting is to discuss lhe core values as
part of t}ie Comprehensive Plrin project. In going through her f'owerPoint presentation, Ms. Rcgor explained
that the discussion will focus on the values aiid the cornprchcnsive plan and haw they all fit together; shc
mcntioned that values address lhose items what are important to the comniuniry; and the vision is a pichu•e of
eNcellcnce: what is the Community's best possible future; a»d the compreliensive plan is what the
cornmunity wants to look like in about 20 years. She stated that the sXrategic plan, whieh is more of a finite
time frarrie, is an action plan for the hi-hest priority goals and 3ctivities that the communiey should engage in
over lhe next five years; 711CI that tI11T PI11] is one of the topics sehedule;d for the upcoming February 12
council reti-eat. ln further explanation, Ms. Regor explained and cliscussed the definition of'values, whai Ihey
represent, thc different Icvels of values, and the progress on clarifying organizationa) values. Ueputy City
Ntanttger Regor stiid that tonight's focus is on cammunity values, and che intent is not to tell the cominunity
what its values should be, hut rathcr staff looks to the Commissioners and Councilmembers as some of the
comrnunity Icacters to articulate what the community's values actually are; and just as each person has a set
of values, so does very community have a set of values; and that the benefic of articulating these principals,
standarcls and actions whieh the comnwnity considers inherently worthwhile and important, is that it will
provide a framework within which the City Couiici) can balaitce cliverse and sometimes conflicting needs as
it makcs decisions. She stated that specific to the Cornprchensive Plan; an understanding of community
valucs will hclp set comprehensive plan goals and policies and later can help in identifying and carrying out
implementation strategies.
~
~._.i
Febivary l, 2005 loinc ivtecting Cauncil & Planning Conunission -`btes Pnoc 1 of 3
Vls. Regor sriici that there was Council consensus at the January 18 meetin? ro use the draft visi4n as a base \for thc values diseussiOn, aiid th~~t ciraft vision is tj "C0111f11Ulllty oT opportunity ~a~here individuals and ' ~i
families can ~rc~w and play anc~ businesses ~+~ill Ilourish and prosper."
Ms. Regor explairied that the Planning CommiSSioners aiid City Councilmembers have been dividcd into
three tmoups and that each group will look at each component of the vision statement: (I) communityo uf
opportunity; (2) individuals aiid families gro«< and play; aiid (3) businesses flourish aiid prosper; and then
discuss what is important about that component; and to also see if anyrthing ha.s been left out of lhe vision
statement that should be included. She introduced die staff inembcrs at each table: Neil Kersten Public
Worlcs Director; Mike Jael:son Parl:s aiid Recreation 17irector, and Vlarina Sukup Cornmunity Devclopment
Director. The tables were grouped as follows:
`9ike Jscksnn's lilue tsblc: Neil Ker-sten's bruwn L-ihle: vlArinH Sukup's L!recn tahle:
Tan Robertson L7ick Denenny Diana Vdilhite
Gail Kogle Gary Schimmels David Crosby
Mikc Planigan Bill Gothmann ttich Munson
Steve `Caylor Bob Blum
Fred Beaulac '
ln a brainstorming process which took approxirnately 45 minuCcs, groups members from each table wrote
down ideas connected witli each component of the vision statement, followed by a report form cach table,
and endcd with each group memhe.r placing their vote for the top three values for each vision category. Ms.
Regor stated that she hopes the evening will result in an identifeation of the key values; consensus on the
defnitions of those <<alues; and aare.ernent on next steps, and added that copies of the Council's resolution
03-027 addressing cnre values was distributed to all members. _
Reporting:
Mayur Wilhite reported for the Green tablc:
CommuniCy of Opportunity:
Snund tinancial management
Accessible governmenk
Citizen protection - puhlic safety e.g. police, fire, courts
lndividual f.'amilics gruw aiid play:
Career opportunities
Encourage diverse business development.
Attractive recreational opportunities
Ciean, at:t:raeiive and wellanaint<iined ncighborhoods and businesses
Citizen participation and volunteerism for betterment ofi the coinmunity
I~usinesses flourish and prosper:
Balanced approaeh tn growth aiid developmcnt:
Formalircd prporam of inpuc and feedback from individual eiti2ens and businesses
Fair and consistent interpretation ancl implementation of regulations
Environment whei•e new businesses locate and existing businesses propagatc
1'ublic Wurl:s nirector Kersten reporfetl for the Rrowti table:
Business opportunities:
Plan for infrastructure to allow development, water; sewer, rnads, wha[cver is needed needs Co be in place to
allow businesses to tlevclop
Work with husinesses, find out what thev need for zoning, what kinds of zoning, medical office, etc.; help
t:hcm get sct up and provide those areas so they have the kind of zoning in locations they need and want to
develop; aiid encourage those kind of uses
February l, 2005 Joini Meeting Cauncil & Planning Coittntission -Notes Paee 2 of 3
I'rovide tools and staF('ta allow a can-do artitude sO that Chey can develop
rducaiional opportunities:
Need higher ectucation, technical education is lacking
hlousinb opporcunities, single family - IpAking f'or wide range from low to high
Multi-use and mixul usc clevelopment
Safety; personal property
Faimess that all citizens when dealing with saFety are treated equally
f nvironment - preserve the existinp natural arcas - specircally Uishman I-[ills and thc River
Loak for qther arcas wil:hin 4he city that are existing that we can look itt, save, buy up, kecp natural
Encow•age private businesses to give them a reason to invest and save natural areas within the City
Parl:s and l7ecrextion Director lV'like ,Tackson reported for the bluc tablc:
Cammunity of'opportunitL
Mentioned that all members of the group fell that all parts of the mission statement were related which makes
it seem tis if it is a cohesive mission statement_
Good public and private relationships
Good relationships wit}i schools anct olher government and Uusinesses
Nced to provide opportunities fon cousing, homes, jobs, education; environment and to look at all ages
Provide opportunity for extended families and multi-geiicrations to be able to live in the same e4mmunity
and find opportLinities in the future
Should be busines5 firiendly
We should make people of dive.rse backgrouncls fee) welcome
Preserve the neiLhborhnnd concepts
Prdvide opportunity for diverse lifesryles
Providc enmmunity places; park and recreation activities and i❑ providing those use jo'►nt ventures and
partnerships wherever possible
I.nctivicluals and Families can Grmw and PIaY:
Develpn a communily identity and pride
Need strong school system
Need real diversity of local employment opportunities, narks, proi4rams, cultural and soeial activities tlirqugh
parenerships
f..oQk at a variery of funding and be creativc in being able to provide these to the communit},
Need good puUlic safeh, and eont.inued public involvement in al) areas
Support neigFiborliood associations
1'rovide good public transportatiou and transportation infrastruelure
13usinesses Plourish and Prosper:
rair tax environment
I-and use should aocornmodate all aspects and awide variet:y of business uses
Deve.lop a city center
1'rovide traiisportation infrastructure, business and indiutry csnters
Provide strong; attrac[ive busincss environment
After the voting of the top tlirce stciCEments, Ms. Regor explained that the shects will be transcribecl, vates
tallied, and it report will be distributed with the results. .
1'lle meeting ended at 7:25 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Chris Bainbridge, CMC
Spokane Valley Ciiy Clerk
February l, 2005 laint AReetinc Cotmcil & Alanning Commissiott - Notes Page 3 of 3
S061&ne
,;oo*Va11ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Sui[e 106 ♦ Spokane Valley N!A 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1006 ♦ ciCyhall@spokanevallcy.org
Memorandum
To: Members of City Council and Members of the Planning Commission
From: Nina Regor, Deputy Clty Manager
CC: David Mercier, City Manager
Date: February 11, 2005
Re: Community Values - Results of February 1, 2005 Joint Meeting
At tlie Febniary 1, 2005 joint tneeting; xve divided the draft Vision statemenl into three
sections. You brainstormed the value components ror each section, then "<<oted" oi1 what
you considered co be lhe highest priorities for eacli section.
The atcached document shows the restilts of that "voting." The rrst pdge 5hows in
priority order the valuc components. While I divideti the list at .five oz more for display
purposes, I don't mean to imply thal we need to cut off at dlat point.
~.._._i
I tried to combine similar priorities into single groupings. One example is
Neighborhoods. During the bravistorming part of the cneeting, there were different
statements periaining to preservation of ncighborhooclS, so I. combuied them for the
purpose of tallying ttie votcs. Howcver; beginning on page two I've included the
groupings; as «rell as those value comPonents that did not receive atIy votcs.
The nexl sleps in lhis process include:
1. identify wluch components are better classified as projects or implementation
stratcgies (e.g., Develop a Cil), Center)
identir:y which components help clarify values, and which rnay be subsets, or a
more detailed description of others
3. draft the values
1 here are a variety of apprpae.hes ynu can take to coutinuing this project. A few
suggestions include:
1. Continue the ;rouP aPproach; i.e.; have a follow-up joint meeting that would be
set up as a working session for the full group.
2. 13reak into three sub-groups asld have inini work sessions, resulting in three drafis
tliat would be considcred by the full group. This is similar to the approach you
took when drafting the Vision statemcnt.
3. Form a sub-commiti:ee to drafi the values and have ihe sub-conuniittee rcporl its
_ i results for cansicleration of the full group.
--COIV.i.MUMTY VA_LUES-
Joint CityCouncil-Planning Commission Meeting
February 1, 2005
oullr.R oF rR1oRrTiEs Priarities - Five or mure votes Tota!
Votes
Neigbborhoods reservation of; well-maintained; ncighbnrhood associations 13
Dcvelo a City Center 9
Parks, Recreation and Nattiral A.reas 9
Int'rastrueture of ood ualinr; lanning for develo ment g
Public Tnvolvement (citizen partiei ation/voliulteerism; feedback program) 7
Public Sd1'cty citizcn rolection; olice/fre/courts 7
Laud Use/"Goning (accommodate all aspeets of business; business/industry 7
centers; rovide needcd zoning)
Conimunity Identit), and Pride 6
Partnershi s ublicJ rivate; schools/gov'Ubusiness S
Business Fnvironment (business friendly; new businesses locatelexistine ~
businesses ro agate.
Pair and Consistent Inter retation and 1m lementation of Regulations 5
Prinrities - Cane through four votes F Tatul Votes
Balanced A roach to Growth ai1d Develo ment 4
Fiscal Res onsibility 4
Home, job; education, environment, all ages, extencied farzuly - opportunities 4
fnr future generation
I-IUUSing 4
Career O ortunities 2
Provide Taols and Staff to Allow "Can Do" Attitude 2
Safety - Fairness to All Cilizens 2
Accessible Government ~
Community Places 1
O ortunities for I-Iigher E-ducaiion 1
1
Programs; C:ultural Activity
Public Trans ortatiqn 1
~
Cummunity Va(ues - Priurities, coofinued
Fclrruary l, 2005
T'agc 2 of 4
Consolidation of Similar Priorities
i
Fiscal 12esponsibilitv "Votes"
Red Ylw Blue 1'oial
Sound financial management 2 2
Variety of fundin 0
Fair taa environment 2 2
Total 2 2 4
Fublic Safiee y "Votes"
Red Ylw Blue Total
Public safely emphasis - cilizen protectinn (PoliceJFire/ 4 4
Courts
Public safety 2 2
Persanal safety 1 1
Total 4 3 7
Irifrasiructure "Votes
Red Ylw I31ue "1'otal
Quality intYaStructure 3 3
Trans ortation infrastructure 0
Plan for infrastructure to allaw devclo ment l 4 5
,
~ Total 4 4 8
Public Involvement ;;Votes"
Red Ylw Blue 1"otal
Ciliren participation and volunteerism for betterment of 6 6
t:he communit
F'ublic involvement 0
Formalized proo aiii of input azld feedbac;k &om 1 1
individual ciiizens and business
Total 7 7
Parlnerships "Votes"
17ed Ylw Blue I otal
Cooci ublic/ rivate relatioilshi s 1 l
Scliools/GovernmenUBusuiess artnerstu s 3 l 4
7 oriii a i s
Red vote = higli priority for Co►nmunity of Opportunit}'; 1'ellow vote = higli priurity for Iadividuais
S Families Cau Grow and Play; F3hie vote = high prioriiy for Businesses Flourish and Prospcr
Community Values - Prioritics, cantinucd
hebruary l, 2005
Pagc 3 of 4
Housin "Votes" '
Red Ylw Blue Total AiCordable housing 2 2
I-Iousing Opporrunities:
• Sin le faanily - wide ran c 2 Z
• Multi-family 4
~ Mixed use 0
"I'otsl 4 4
Neighborlioads "Votes"
Red Ylw F31ue "I otal
Preservation of neighborhoods 4 1 5
Clean, attractive, tivcll-maintained neighborhoods & 6 6 .
businesses
Su ort nei hborhood associations 2 2
Tota1 4 9 13
Parl:s, Recrealic7n and Natural Areas "Votes"
Red Ylw Blue Tolal
Park & recreation activities, 'oint veniures & artnershi s 1 1
Atcractive recreational o portunities 2 2
Parks arcnerslu s 0 '
.nviroiiment: • Preserve existin natural areas 4 4
• Look for new natural areas 0
• F..ncotira e rivate investment in natural areas 2 2
Total 5 4 9
Business Environment "Votes"
Red Ylw Bluc Total
Business friend] l l
Encourage diversc business develo ment 0
Diversit Ui' local em loyment U
Environment wfiere ncw businesses locate and existing 4 4
businesses ro a ate
Business attractive environment 0
Tc►tal 1 4 5
.
;
Red vote = high priority fnr Community of OpportunitV, 1'cllow vote = high priority for Individuals
& Fainilies Can Grow and PIay; I31ue vote = higli priority fur T3usinesses Flourish and F'rosper
Comcnunity Values - Priorities, contintied
February l, 2005
F'ngc 4 of 4
L,and UseJ7onin "Votes"
Red Ylw I31ue Tota)
Land use to accoinniodate all as ects of business l 1
Business uid industry centers 3 3
Diversity of loeal em loyment 0
Work with business io rovide nccded zoning 2 1 3
Total 2 5 7
"SCand-Alone" Priorities "Votes"
Red Ylw Blue Total
Accessible overnment 1 I
Htime, jab, education, environmcnt; all agcs, extcnded 3 1 4
fam.ily - o ortunities f"or future ene.raCipn
Make peo le of diverse backEounds feel welceme 0
17iverse lifest les 0
Communit y laces I 1
Career o oriunities 1 1 2
Commuuiiiy identity and ridc 6 6
Stron school system 0
Programs; cultural activity 1 1
Public trans ortation 1 1
( 1 Balanced a roach to rowth and dcvelo ment 4 4
;
" • Fair and consistent interpretaiion and implemEntation of 5 5
re ulations
Develo a City Ccntcr 9 9
Educational0 orhuiities:
• Hi her education 1 1
• "I'cchnical 0
• IC-12 a
Safcty:
• Pro erty 0
• Fairness to all citizens
Provide tools and staff to allow "can do" attitude 2 2
._i~ .
12cd vote = high priority for Commtmity of Opportunity; Yellow vote = high priority for T.ndivicluals
& Families Can Crow and PIay; Blue vote = high priority for Businesses Tlourish And Yrosper
Spokane Counry Library District
Spokane Valley Library Services and Disixi.ct Support
Repoxt to the City of Spokane Valley
january 2005
:
Custvmer use measures, District-wide
As with last January, many liUrary use measures were below the previous yeat•-moSt notaUly
circ ulatian and reFerence, rw4 of our primary h•ad.itional sErvices. This in spite oE the fact that shff
felt that aur libraries seemed tA be very busy. 'I`his is disturbing, disappointing, and frustrating for
us, especially in view of our cfforts in updating the collection, pw•chasing mnre copics of high-
demand materials, improving the online catalog, and mal:ing self-pickup of holds and self-checkout
available at an increasinS number of branches. It's also contrary to the experienc.e of many other
libraries in the shte. lt's an issue thah Che management team will be addressing in coming months,
although we need to wait to see if tlus is a conkinuuig trend or just a one-month ai-iomaly.
4Vhile cu•culation was dotirn at every Uranch except Deer Park, onli.ne renewals canti,nue with a
doublE digit iiicrease (26 over last January. "I"he number of progran-ts/group visits and attendancc
at them was also up significantly-18% and 7.5% respectively. Me(Aing room booku-igs werc up 9%.
.Also soniewhat of a susprise (and borne out by circulation and. referenCe statistics) is that branChes
report that d-iere has been no noticeable increase in use su1ce Spokane Public Library so sevcrely
~ reducecl hours on January 1. It may eventuaIly occur whEn people in the "border" areas realize that
we're open more hou.rs and that they can use our L1teb sitc for holds. Hnweve.r, there has been an
increase in the Wednesday storytime at North Spokane, a day when l•he Shadle branch is now closed.
Customer use ineasures, Gr.eater Spokane Valley
Overall librar), usc un the 5pokanc Valley reflects that of thc District as a whole, and in s9m.e arEas the
d.rops from last january ai'e even grcater.
Selected January 2005 Statistics
CirculaHon Door count Rcference Program Internet
In uiries Attendance Bookin s
1TU 1TD to 1'I'D YTD to YTD YT'D to YTD Y'TD to YTD Y'TD to
2405 2004 2003 2003 2003 2003
Total
5CLf) 146,142 - 6.1l0 69,11.6 - 2.4g5 78,854 -4.8% 3,757 + 15.0% 13,851 - 8.3:0
Valle 40,527 - 71.5°,b 17,824 - 7.4.7% 4,932 - 24.7 nS 892 +50.9°!0 4,533 -11.0°,b
P~o nne 9,705 - 7.5°0 5,628 - 4.5 % 916 -13.1 M 121 -16.0010 688 - 37.4°ro'
Otis 6,850 -15.395 3,476 +3.2'90 676 + 5.535 64 - 44.8 ro 631 -12.8 fo
Subtota] 57,082 -11.3% 26,928 -10.796 6,524 - 20.9% 1,077 + 2fi.6% 5,872 -15.4%
~ '%u SCLD 39.1°G 39.0g6 34.6~ 28Jro 42AQw
Page 1 of 6
January Registered Customers by Branch of Registration
2005 Total of SCLD YTI7 Change 9/4 Adult Youth ; from 2004 -
Total . 100,723 -7.6% 73% 27%
SCLD
Valle 34,167 33.910 -9.0% 76% 24%
Argonne 9,108 9.0% -11.2% 76 M 24ro
Otis 5,374 5.3% -78.0% 66 ~i'U 34 %
Subtutal 48,649 4$.3% -11.8%
At branches serving Spokane Valley residents...
Regional Sumulary (Ellen 1Vliller, reginnal »ianager): January is traditionally a month that staxts slow
and ends f.ast. Th.is year was no exception. All scrvicc, points were being actively used by the end of
the month and also, as usual, winter illnesses caused scheduling chal.lenges.
Information services/Adult services (Karere Bynte, reginnal supervisor): Region II informadon
services staff axe being oriented to Inteinet training, learning how to set up thc- lab, and dUserving the
instruction, and providing one-to-one instruction far class members so that there'll bc additional staff
available to teach the classes; Karen has begun working with staff on planning for the enlarged
Moran I'rairie collection; inforn-tation ser>>ices staff were treated to a training sESSion an infarnlation
behaviors, the intent of which is to help staff integrate into tlteir regular referencc/readcr's advisulg
the behaviors that the Dish-ict has identified as part of the Strategic Plan IVlission/Goals/Values
statements for lhis year: &reefi customers; fiiendly, open facial expressian and posture; asku1g open- ~
ended questions; accampanying customers to the shelf or computer; establishing that customers feel
their tluestions were answered or that ttley have enough information to gel started; and walking
around oEEeri.ng help to customers.
Youth Services (Marij Eilen Braks, regional supervisor): 1Needing took place at all the branches;
storytimes resumed ah all branches; at Valley"s opEn housE kids made pictures about what they l.i.ke
about the library, and Central Val]ey students helped out tirith the l.ids; the after school spECial that
was presenhed at all brlnches-"Tales With A Twist" -went well and thc kids had a greah ti-me wikh
the craft and enjoyed making up tlieir piwn fractured fairy tale in a mad-lib form.
Vczlley (Ellen MiTler, re.giofial manaycr): Starting the year with the lazowledge that the branch tivill he
open was great news and sraFF attempted tA catch up with many projects khat we had placcd on hold
because we wcrE not sure about service to Spokane Valley; the highlight of the month was the open
house to recognize 50 yeaes of great service to the g-reater Spvkane Val.ley area, which had a much
lugher attendance than expected-about 200; the Val.ley branch is being g-iven a TV, VHS player,
DVD player and a cart to put them on for use by community groups using the Valley meeting room
and will be a wonderful addition to the scrvices that car► Uc offered to the public; the i emony 5nicket
part}, we11Y Vel-y well, with 44 kicis in attendance.
Argottne (Jttdy Lttck, branch sriperUisor): Classes ,Froin Orchard Prairie School cane in h,vo different
aftcrnoons to work on History Dap projects, a.nd a small, self-sufficicnt group franl Faith Bapkist
Academy also visited to do some research; the After School Special wasn't• as well-attendcd as it
should have bee.n, a.nd cve're looking at ways to market progranis her.e inore effectively; artwork in
the hame i.n the children's area is from Pasadena Park Elementary and features snowmen; it was
Naiional Hot "1'ea Moczth so staff put togelher a l.ittle presentation of books and teapots for the display
- Page 2 of 6
case; the display rack featured the Districh themE of New Year's Resalutions; a.nd the display tablc
~ had Uooks about snow, snowuig, and more snowmen.
Otis Orcl7ards (f3ev Bergsfirarn, branc{t srtpervisor): The l•urnout for the Fractured Fairy '1"ales Aftcr
Schoal Spcci3l was $ kids; artwark in the children's arca was swapped for Moran.f'rairie's t.ewis and
Clark themc; the donut hable seating was recovered to match the chair-and-a-half fabrir, the teen and
pict•ure book arcas were rearranged; CD ti•ays were added for the growing adult CD collection.
Orctreuch (Annette Eberleirt, sr.cpervisor): Staff streamlined a procedure to check-in nevv boaks,
provide a hamebound newsletter and get new books out far library loan months sooner; the Dapcare
Packet colleclion o.f over 1,000 books is being updated to be consistEnt with Distriet collection
guidclines; nEw services are being added to t-A~o facilitics already being visited: Sunshine Terrace aiid
Fairfield Good Samaritan; the 1Ninter newsletter was completcd; stafF began to distriUule a writtEn
list of books reacl during story time.
Quott af the month-"AZrs. Lulda (stoi-yteller), may I have 2 book list to bring home ta my parents, I
want to hear d-iat srory again."
Friends of the L.ibrary
Valley: The Valtey Friends met and set a dal•e .(or theu book sale. This is really exciting since this wall
be their first fund raising aclivity. They aLso said tklat they azc veiy interested in sellu-ig °goodics" at
thc film nights thar begin in the spruig.
Otis Orchurds: Besides paying for reupholstering the kids' area donut table, the 017s Friends also
provided thc nloney for soil and p1nlters tA repot• the plants ui the library.
~ • O
Library materials
■ Ordering began with a bang but due to the luattis For a couple of weeks in December, staff kept up ,
with the flow imirediately as they came i.n. 2,086 titles and 7,075 copies were ardered and 5,760
items were sent to Uranches.
• Ordering began in earnest for Moran I'rairie and the first boxes of items were processed and
slored.
• Very sizEable large print and audiobook orders were placed.
■ Booklists "published" u1 January included "Feline Favorites" and "Books for pog Lovcrs," eac11
featuri.ng both Fiction and nnn-fichioil for adults. 1wo lists for February were a]so finished.
Programming
■ Final arrangements were made for twQ fly-ti}+ing programs for February.
■Four prograrns were a.rranged for late March/carly Apri1. Local author Tcrry Baines will read
h•om his boolc You Are rr Dog and sign books.
Technical Services
■ Rollovcr pf orders from FY2004 to FY2005 was coinpleted on January 7 with no significaill
problems.
New dataUase aulhority filES fi•om our new vendor, Backstage Library Worl:s, were processed and
uploaded.
Interlibrary Lnan
627 items were lent to ather libraries and 255 items borrowed for our customers. Thc nlargin of the
amount of ]end.i.ng ovcr borrowitig has been growing.
Page 3 af 6
Uther
Youtli scrviees coordinator Thom Barthelmess fi.nished lus year of preparation far the Newbery
Award CoiT-imittee work and was very p]eased wit11 the com.mihtee's work and selections. Here's %
what• he said:
"Chen I went to Boston, and worked very, very hard. I'ni so grateful for the opportunity 1 enjoyed to work
with wUnclerfiil pcaple for a common, important purposc. My appreciation for the Ncwbcry meclal, my
2004 literary awarcne.ss, my understanding for the valuc of strong leaderslup, -uid my aw•arene.ss of
committee dyna.ntics have all grown immensely, and wi.ll serve me well for a long tinie.
. DMINISTRATIO
New Moran Prairie Ilibrary
Construction documen~.s were campleted and madE available to contractors in the second week qf
January, with the bid opening scheduled foi• February 8. There's been a grcat deal of contractor and
subcontractor interest in the projert a-nd there was a good turnout fnr the January 20 pre-bid
conferEncc.
Collection 5ervices plans to puxchase an additional 12,000 items for the cal.lection a.nd has already
begun ordering. The materials will be stored in some unused mai.ntenanCe area space at the
tld.mini.sti•ative Offices. Of the $265,000 allocated for materials, about $15,000 will be used for
processing supplies and $22,000 for additioriid staff hou.rs required for processing.
Wc won't begin to plan tor FF&E purchases until after the bid opening.
Purged customer accounts
Wc delete accounfis for customers who have had no activity for tltree years, writing off an}°thing
owed as uncollectible. These custom.ers receivEd two overdue notices, their borrowi.ng privileges
were blocked when diey reached a threshold of $10, a.nd those with larger accounts were referred to
our collecrion agency.
Here's a compai-ison of the write-offs from 2003 (for matErials due in 2000) and 2004 (for materials
due in 2001).
Fees & char es $37,7.54.25 $35,544.25
Items deleted 2,522 2,458
Value of items deleted $36,197.29 $35,261.75
Total $73,351.54 $70,806.00
It's interesting to note that the totals for both fccs and charges and items deleted ar.e qu.ite si.milar for
both years. DelEted items are about 0.6% oE the total collection. 1Nhile ir's unfortunatc, that we have
any non-recoverable materials anci charges, our actual loss of books and other materials is relativel}'
IQ4V.
Strategic Planning
The events of last Ial.l pretty much halted work on reviewing the 2004-2006 Strategic Plan and looking
at any updates ta objectives or activities. This mpnth the manageinent team revicwed objectives and
-ietivit7es and will be recammending a few changes to you at your in Februarp meetuzg. We're setting
up the process far compiling measurements of objectives, wfuch I expect to Ue ab1E ta report Uy the
rn.iddle to end of March.
i
As you saw u1 the 2004 aclivity report that you received, we're moving a.head with a numUer nf
strategic: plan initiatives.
Page 4 of 6
Legislative session
The 59th 1+1'ashington State Legislature beg3n its fust session on thE 10t". By thc end of the mvnth
1TOtllld 1,000 bills had been i.ntroduced, a rypical number al that point u1 time.
The Washi.ngton Librai-y Flssociatian will bc participaling with other local governments in two types
o( proposed praperty tax legislatian. The first is to allow all local governments the ability lo pr.opose
muld-year excess (spceial) levies to voters. This will require a conskihttiona.l amendmenfi. 7'he seco.nd
is to allow library, fire, cemetery, and metro park diskricts the same ability to propASe multi-year leNry
lid ovcrrides as cities and. counties currently have. Both are enabling leg7slation that gives ]QCaI
voters the opportunity to ara.ke a tax i,ncrease deeision.
Another arEa in which WLA has interest is access to pubLic records, the subjecl• oF severat bills that
attempt to address issues raised by a recent state Supreme CQUrt decision: gAVernnlent's ability to
deny a puUlic records rEqucst bEcause it's "averly braad" (e.g. "everythuig sent to the Boazd af
Trustces in the past 10 years") and because of attorney-cl.ient privilege. WLA will paxt7ci.pate in a
coaliHon wii:h othex local govern.ments to alt•empt to assure that aiiy new legislation doesn't place
unr.easonable or unworkable demands on us.
WLA is also interested in pa.rticapati.ng in legislation relaled to early learning-a g-rowi.ng issue this
session-since it's a major paxt• of oux mission. I'he goa] is for libraries to be .recognized as an
important venue where early learni.ng takes plaCe.
Library Legislative I7ay
I'll be attcnding this }'ear's Library Legislative Day u1 Ol}=mpia on February 17. BeCause of the
Legislature's scheduling on that day, VVLA activities will be somewhat chopped up to allow legislator
, visits in the morniiig. 1 have a T..egislahive' Pla.nning Cotnm.ittee meeting the afternoon before and a
4Vi..A Board meeting the da}, after.
Miscellaneous
■$pokane l'ublic Library's greatly reduced open hours took effect on January 1. We'll be
informaUy trackulg the unpact on qur branclies, at least to the exte.nt that can be done. Somc of it
can be concretc (nEw cards issued to Spokane residents) but increases in use by Spokane residcnts
can only be anecdotally measured.
• The new Web site should be up in mid-Ma.rch.
■ E-rate fil'uzg foi• telecommunication cost discou.nts is undenvay. '1'h.is is a very complex and time
consuming process, but it brings in $50,000+ in discounts.
• 1T manager Priscilla Ice has agreed to accept a nominadon far Washington Library Assozial•ion
treasurcr. It's a twa-year term with the election later this spri.ng.
Community rclahions
Valley Library's open housc an January 12 wzs quite successful cvith an attendance estimate of about
200. Besides al.l SCLD `l°rustees, Spokane Valley's mayor and fotu Cduncil members attended, as well
as the city manager and deputy city manager.
• • i • O
• Coordinated the kick-off rcccptidn for the Valley 50th AzlniversarT celebration anci facilitated an
article on thc recepdon wzd year-lang celeUration.
■ Created outline far 2004 annual report. ~ ■ Apri1 lNLE1 cAnference activides included coordi.naii.ng mailistg of registration packets, conference
publicity for thc WLA listserv, updating the conference Web site, and begirining to draft the
conference program booklet.
Page 5 of 6
HijmANT O
`
•'1'he annual OSHA repart was conlpleted and postcd.
■ IrZtcr.views were held for three positions.
• The fall StafF Development and Trai.ning Day program was conlpleted.
• f'aul continued t4 review and revise the 1'ersonnel Policy for Board actian in Fetiruary and March. .
• Paul attended the first jaint board meetuig for WCIF/ INCIP at which a new exEcuHve director
was interviewred and selected.
• All cmployces werE mailed forms to update cmployce inforination and notices to comply with
Federal lacv for COB[ZA and women's cancer rights noYification.
INFOWMATION • O
■ 1.n Web-related wArk, tsunami lin.ks wcre addEd to fihe curreTit events page; Web specialist Doug
Stumbough began to providc support for the jNLA conference web site; timE was spent
troubleshooting IRS forms and PAC compatibilit), a.nd the IRS luilc was addEd to the homepage;
wror.k continued with iPAwerplant on the weUsite redesign.
• Ln computer support, a good laptop and projector is now available in each of rhe thrce mai.ri
buildings, Argonne, Valley, and North Spokane; publ.ic station a.nti-virus u.pdates began ta be run
remotely; self-check statYOn imaging build.ing conti.nued and more sclf-check stations will be
installed in February, at a eost of about $1000 per shatian (touch screen, scanner a.nd receipt
printer).
• E-rate forn-is 486 and 470 were, filed online and preparatinns made for the 471.
■ A g-reat deal of behind-tlie-scenes server-related work was done, includuig building and installing a public domain controller for Ueer Park; izlstalling and configuring FTP service on Argonne and North Spokane domain controllers for anti-vi.rus updaties; worked through a server
crash that was soft-vvare-related; setti.ng up Exchangc Web access for sraff and conversion to full
Exchange accounts for all staff.
■ In ad.dition to working on WLA confercnce treasurer duties, Pricilla assisted with updat-ing the
registration database.
. MANAGER)
■ January is one nf the lower months for property tax callections, with only $18,029 received from
the reg'ular levy.
• In Eacilities maintenarlce, coordination began for t11e Argoruze recarpeting and paint~ng project
postponed from last year.
• SErvice agreements were campleted for new postage tneters khat comply witli the new
requirement of the Un.ited States Postal5ervice (US:I'S) to unplement digital systEms.
■ 2004 ti1'-2 forntis were distributed ta emplvyees, IRS 1099 forms were dist7ibutEd to applicable
vendnrs and td the [nternal l2evenue Service, and W-3 RL W-2 forms were submi.rled to the Social
Security Adminiskration.
• i3i11 Ucgan the review process for 2004 financial statements.
Note: This report is excerpted from the I7ecember 2004 report to the Spokane County Library District
Board of Trustees with addcd in.formatiori specifical.lp rElated to Spokane Valley libr.ary serviees, ~
~
. Page 6 of 6