2005, 09-06 Study Session
AcF.lvD,►
C11'Y OF SPOkANE VAI.fyGl'
CITY COLfNCIL WORK4HEE'I'
S'TUDY SESSIUN
Tuesday, 5cptemhcr 6, 2005 6:00 p.m.
SPOI{ANF VALLEY CIT'Y A4L1.
11707 Eaat Sprngne Avenoe, 5aitc 101
(Pleu.sc Turn RffAll FIcctmnic Dcvkrs lluring the Mrcting)
DISCt1S5IUIY LEADER SLTRJFCT/ACI'IVITY GOAL
l. ~1arinu Sukup (10 minutcs) !'roposed Urdinance 05-025, Extending LiR-1 Zoning AJc►pt C1rdirwncc
AN OIZUINANCE Ur TIiL CITY OF SFOKANF.
VALLL-Y, WASI-IINGTON, Eh"TEJDING'I1Ir URBAN
FtF:SID1:IvTtAL E5TA7'E (UR-i) iN'!'ERiM "LUNfTv(-i
AUT110R1'LED BY C1RD(NANCF NU. 04-035 T'(3R AN
AllQf'I'IONAI. Si.\ MC)N'aiS IN 7'1IE PUNDGROSA
AND RUTCEiIrORD AREAS AND AMFNDLNG THE
W'c?RKI'1.AN AIYD DECLARING AN URGF.NCY AND
ENiERGENCY NECESStTA'I'ING 7`f tE IMhiF.DIA7 l;
AU(7PT7()N Or THE OR!)INANCE AND FURTf-IL•R
"t'HAT TT-IF OIZUMANCE SHAL.L IIE EIT•TC7'IVF
liP(liv ADOpT10N.
ipubllr comment]
hlike Connclly (10 niinutrs) Prerpo5ed Rc,.>lutiun 054)19 Amending Resafutian 05-018, Appruvc Rrs+!lutiun
Novctnber Ballat lssue [public commentj
Kegular Sturty S~s,clc►►t Uiscw•siun Issues (Nu Publlc Cunrn►rnt):
3. De:p:trtntcnt Ditccturs I ligtilip)tts ef ?Onl, Btidect Disrussicm-7nforrri atiun
( 40 minutes)
-l. I'tim S.:hoItens (!0 miiiutes) 'ttasterFce Schedulr Artirntiment, Pi;►n Disc:is;ion~lnfonnati(-in
Rcview Fcc;
ti Dare 1lrrcicr I30 mintttes) Cienernl Budgct Discussion I)iscussion tiI torrnation
fi. ktnyor Wiiliitc ct, mitsutesl Advsncr :lkeri.l.i ;1(hiiti0ns Discussinli-lnlurniation
7. %lci%or \4'11hitc Council hrck in I>i.cutitiiuiI/ I111~ormstion
8. Unvc Mcrcicr City llfanagcr tornmcnl5 Disc ussMtLTnfornta6011
ADJOURN
Nnte; llnless c»herwise auttd above, there will bo nn public camments at Counril Srtidy tiess) an+. iiowc%er, c ouneil a1k,6-ays
resenre.s thc right tn roqutst infurmntian fiom thc publlc und staff as appropriate.
N0771:.E: !tulividstalf ptunutitg to attend the ntieecMg wfio recryire Vmial sssistanee lo tu:commo:ote p}i}vcnl, hcaring, nr otl= impairmrnts,
~ pirasz conwrt che Cicy Ctark nt (5"1931-104aQ as sam ns pcicsiblr sa char arrnnhancnts may be mnde.
`;c_dti <cso~.rnJ~ n,_r~.nc ,
~ I
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 6, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing
. ❑ information ❑ admin. report 0 pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Ordinance 05-025 An ordinance extending the UR-1
Urban Residential Estate Interim Zoning for an additional six months
in the Ponderosa and Rotchford neighborhoods and amending the
findings of fact and work plan.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.63.220, Spokane Valley Ordinance 04035
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance 04035 adopted on August 24, 2005
and effective on September 8, 2004. Council was
briefed on the proposed extension on August 9,
2005.
BACKGROUND: A moratorium or interim zoning ordinance may be effective for not longer than
six months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related
studies providing for such a longer period. A moratorium of interim zoning ordinance may be
renewed for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings
of fact are made prior to each renewal.
The Interim UR-1 Urban Residential Estate Zoning was effective on September 8, 2004. The
original work plan had anticipated completion of the Cornprehensive Plan prior to this date. In
addition, further analysis is required to complete the work plan based on the following:
• Revision of Floodplain maps for the Chester Creek area by FEMA and re-mapping of
Saltese Creek as part of a larger project.
• Possible reclassification of stream types by the Department of Natural Resources.
• Completion of a draft Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan with the concurrence of .
emergency response personnel relating to urban wildland fire and evacuation
• Environmental impact of land use as part of the Comprehensive Plan.
• The resolution of the wastewater capacity issue resulting from the Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL) Study by the Department of Ecology and the Environmental
protection Agency (EPA) remains incomplete.
A public hearing was held before the Planning 'Commission on August 25, 2005. Planning
Commission recommends extending the Interim UR-1 Residential Estate zoning for a period of
six months, with a revised Findings of Fact and Workplan.
OPTIONS: PVot Applicable.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Suspend the rules, declare an emergency, and
adopt the Ordinance effective immediately upon adoption.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director
1
. ~
J ATTACHMENTS:
Draft ordinance, Findings of Fact, Amended Woricplan, Planning Commission Draft
Minutes of August 25, 2005
~ crrY aF sroicaivr vaY.LEY
SPOKANF COU\`TY, WAS13~I!\iGTON
QR.1)1NANCE NO. 05-025
AN nRDli\'ANGE ON" '1`HF CITY OI' SPOKANT VriLl1Ei Y, WAS1iINGTON, -
EYTEiNDl1`G TIIE. UI213AN RES1llLNTTAL ESTATE (UR-1) INTERIM
ZON1t1G AUTHOR.IZED 13Y ORUINA.NCE NO. 04-035 FOR AN ADlll'I'IONAL S1X MONTHS IN THE POiNTEROSA AIVD 1tOTCHFOI2D ARFAS AND ANIENbING TFrL+" R'ORKE'L,AN ANll DFCLAR1'NG A~\`
URGF\TCY AND EMERGFNCY \'ECFSSITATING THE .1_Mil'[EDIATF
A17U1'TION OF TTiF O1ZDINANCE AND h"U12TFTER TFLAT - TFiE
QRnINANCE SA.ALL BE rF.FECTIVE UPON ADQPTION
NVffERGAS, The Growt}l Management Aet provides that all zoning regulations be consisteat with
an adopted Comprehensive Plan (RCW 35A.63.105); 3nd
WHERrAS, RCW 35A.63.220 provicles for establishment of interim zoning for up to one year
following a public hearing where a VVork plan is developed for related studies, and
w - M:EREAS, the interim zoning may be extended for one or more six-month periods if a.
subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are rnade prior to each renewal; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan is not yet complete;
WI•ir'.R.F_AS, VVAC 365-195-310(2)(1) providcs that "[i]n developing the housing element
~ J attention shnuld be working with the desires of residents to preserve the character and vitality of existing
neighborlioocis, along with the rights of people to live in the neighbarhnod of thei.r choice"; and
WHEI~EAS, the revisiort of the ] 00-yea.r floodplain is still under development by the Federal
Emergency Managemcnl Agency (:rC1V1A); and VVHEREAS, various stuclies require.d to completc the a.nalysis nf the envi.ronmental impacts
• remain incomplete; and Wf-1EfZF,AS, the neighborttoods desire to continue the Interim 7oning until such time as full
analysis has been completed; and
Wf-IERCAS, the City of Spokane Vslley Planning Commissiori held a public hearing on t:he proposed six montli extension of time on August 25, 2005, and has recommendcd approval of tt revised Findings of Fact and workplan; and
WHEEZFr1S, Ordinance 04-035 will no longer be effective after September 8, 2005, and
WHEREAS, There is not suffcient time tn present ta the couneil an Ordinance extending the
effective date of Ordi.nanc,e 04-035 unless such Ordinance is passed at the next scheduled City Council
meeting of September 6, 2005 and is effective immediately upon adoption, and
W1-I.r.REAS, in the cvent that tliis Ordinance providing for the extension nf Interim Urban Fstate
(UR-1) Goning is not e.ffective until some time after the last effective date of Ordi.nance 04-035,
applications for Puture specific developments after the effective date of Ordinance 04-035 and prior to We
j effective date of Ordinance 05-025, would result in developrnent which is inconsistent with the Intcrim
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Spokane Valley, and which would undermine the eff.ectiveness alicl
Ordinauce 05-025, Exteucling [nterim UR-1 Zoning Page I of 2
purposc of the clraft Comprehensive Plan and ol:her analysis currently being conducted and speci.fically
referenced in tlie H'inding of faet and Work Plati referenced aUove, and
WHERFAS, such applications wider the circumstances set forth above would imp3ir pubiic
health, public safety, public property and public peace, NOW, TI-IEREFQRE, the City Coimcil of tlie City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as
folloNvs:
Section 1. The Interim Urban lYesidential Estate (UR-1) Gortin~ is hereby e;xtended far an sdditinnal
six montli period within the original bounditries set forth in Spokane Vallcy Ordinance No. 04-035.
Section 2. An emergency is hereby declared making immediate passage oP t.his ordinance necessary to
proCect the public health, public safety, public property and publie peace and further ►naking this
ordinance efti,ctive immcdiately upon passsge.
Section 3. Scverabilitv. If any section, sentence, elause or phrase of this ordinanee stiall be held Co bc
invalid or unconstitutional by a court of compeCcnt jurisdiction, such invalidity or uncanstitutiont3liCy shall
not affect the validity or cpnstihitionality of any ot.her section, sentcnce, clause nr phrase of this
ordinarice.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in fiill forcc and effect upon adoption as is set farth
for emergency ordinances in RCW 35A.12.130. .
PASSED by the City Council this fi"' dfly of Septernber, 2005.
Nlayor, Diaiia Wilhite
ATTF,ST:
City Clerh, Ghristine Bainbridge
Approvcd us to Form:
Office of thc City AttornEy
Uate of Publication:
Effective Uate: Sepcemher 6, 2005
~
Ordinance 05-025, Extendiag interim UR-1 'Loaing Page 2 of 2
_ - • i I ~ -
,
7 ~ ~
i I^ I _ _ I : =-I
- _ -~~-r-,_ ~ ~ ~ LJ-~
Ll i
~
I T;, -lj - j
; 1 `i
,
; i 'I
i
I
Exhibit "A" Ponderosa f~
Portion
( I ) I • r-"
1 I ~ ,
~ .
Exhibit "B"
Rotchford Acres
P-- "
- -T-1
Exhibit "C"
REVI5ED UR-1 Interi►n ?_oning Wark Pian
p: ~ 0~ a W w 0105 Os as o] 0! O4W 0 t a
ID TatJr Name Sfs►f FiWsA t)uratlan
wf ,Rn ~u A.y aQv oor rre. o~c .rn r.a Mr ~a +Mf~ .~w J~e Mo s~a o~ N.. 4r .r~ F.o
t Neiphbo►hood ClNrscEar 4I3Q120m 12faW200E s7.iw
2 ~ 4lJ012004 12f901200:1 872w
3 Oeslyn Quadty t0119f2pW 12/3012009 82-9w -
< Etwkomtwnta! Qualky f119t206i 912Of2007 101A+w
i Chastcr Goek Ro-map 811920115 7!2l2007 832w
e sannse cre" Re-Aaaa 1+12en005 91200007 9+.3w
7 Publlc ►iealWSsfety 7fa12006 iMI2007 lL2w
a Fkaza~rd MMiQaUaf: Aocess 718l2005 51412007 952rv -
0 PUbfiC NoLte 12/9/2004 228/2006 83 aww
10 Rputatory Rwiew 11Z12W200i i/2112006 fw
11 C.omp PIOn Reg: OrdR 12118J20U5 2l24(2006 9w ~
_ Chipinal Tasks
~ Ne+v TasAs
'DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPI411ENT;
YY
~
f:! 1 lfP
/~y~ ~y~ ne - ;
FINDI,NG.S OF :FACT . Y r- ~
~o ~
~ . . . i4 y. :'!'h.-, ...1..
S
REVISED AUGUST;1 r:2005 .
EXTENSION OF, INTERIM URBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
VAI' ley
; j, . (UR-1) ZONING FOR SIX MONTHS THS
STAFF REPORT DATE: August 1, 2005
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Extension of interim zoning controls to limit residential densities for a period
of six months, and to continue practice of allowing the keeping of large animals on residential lots.
PROPOSAL LOCATION: Portions of the Ponderosa and Rotchford residential subdivisions.
PREPARED BY: Marina Sukup, AICP, Director, Spokane Valley Community Development Dept.
1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROPERTY INFORMATION: -
-'Size 8'•': Ponderosa: Located adjacent to Browne's Mountain on the southern edge of
Charactenstics:°_': the City, neighboring the Dishrnan Natural Area on the northwest and the Iller
Conservation area on the south. Fully developed single-family residential lots
generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local access and residential
collectors. Limited access to municipal wastewater collection system. Terrain
hilly with intermittent strearns feeding Chester Creek. Portion of the
¶subdivision located within the 100-year floodplain. Large stands of native
Ponderosa pines. Abuts a closed landfill. Platted in phases between 1964
- and 1992.
. Rotchford: Located on the eastern edge of the Crty. Fully developed single-
family residential lots generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local
access and residential collectors. No access to municipal wastewater
' - ~ collection system. Rolling terrain abutting steep hills with drainage into
~ •~4'.°~>~'-"- Saltese Creek. Saltese Creek is located within the 100-year floodplain.
Platted in 1974. .
. Both subdivisions were originally platted as residential subdivisions designed
for the keeping of a limited number of horses.
SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 8c ZONING
~-Subject . ; ` Comprehensive Plan - Low Density Residential
;:Properties:•:='.;< Zoning - Interim UR-1 Residential Estate
l~1
PreservaCron of Exfsting Resodential Subdivfsions (UR-1 Interfm Zoning)
FINDINGS Revised
August S, 2005
1 of 5
II. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
WTERIM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Relevant provisions of the Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan are found in Chapter 6
(Housing) includes the Vision -"Spokane County is a community that provides the opportunity for a
variety of housing types and development pattems for all incomes and lifestyles while preserving the
environment and the character of existing neighborhoods."
"Planninq Principles"
The follawing planning principles, developed through citizen participation efforts, form the basis for
development of the Urban Land Use Chapter:
• Compact urban forms should be encouraged that create a greater sense of "community," with
pedestrian/bicycle-friendly settlement pattems.
• Neighborhood character should be preserved and protected.
• Jobs, housing, services and other activities should be within easy walking distance and shorter commute times of each other.
• Communities should have a center focus that combines commercial, civic, cultural and
recreational uses.
' • Streets, pedestrian paths and bike paths should contribute to a system of fully connected
routes.
• Communities should have a diversity of housing and job types that enable residents from a wide range of economic levels and age groups to work and reside within their boundaries.
General Goals
UL.1a Provide a healthful, safe and sustainable urban environment that offers a variety of
opportunities for affordable housing and employment.
UL.1 b Create a future rich in cultural and ethnic diversity that embraces family and community values
and recognizes the interests of the whole community. Goal UL.2 Maintain and enhance the quality of life in Spokane County through urban design
standards.
Policies . UL.2.1 Establish rninimum performance standards within the zoning code for nuisances such as
noise, vibration, smoke, particulate matter, odors, heat and glare and other aspects as appropriate to
ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and neighborhoods.
UL.2.2 The design of development proposals should accommodate and complement environmental
features and conditions, and preserve and protect significant cultural resources.
UL.2.6 Develop urban design "guidelines" that provide consistency of applicatian for the design
review process. The guidelines should focus on the functional interrelationships between land use, site
design, neighborhood character and transportation systems.
UL2.9 Develop neighborhood, subarea and community plans with specific design standards
that reflect and preserve community character.
UL.2.11 Promote linkage of developments with open space, parks, natural areas and street
connections.
Preservation of Existing Residenflal Subdivisions (UR-1 Inierim Zoning)
FINDINGS 32evised
August 1, 2005
2of5
UL.2.12 Enhance and preserve the site characteristics of residenfial development (existing trees,
watercourses, historic features and similar assets) through sensitive site planning tools such as
clustering, lot averaging, transfer of development rights and flexible setback requirements.
Goal UL.4 Encourage exemplary developments and creative design through the use of
performance standards.
Policy
UL.4.1 Allow flexibility and innovative design through the use of performance standards which
emphasize outcomes.
Goal H.1 Coordinate housing policies and programs with other jurisdictions, agencies and
neighborhoods.
H. 1.3 -"Provide opportunities for early and continuous participation of citizens and neighborhood
groups in land use and community development planning processes.°
H. 1.5 -"Encourage the creation and continued operation and effectiveness of neighborhood
associations through neighborhood and subarea planning programs."
Goal H-2 Reduce regulatory barriers and allow greater flexibility in the housing
development process.
Policy
H2.2- When developing housing regulations, consider the balance between housing affordability and
environmental quality, design quality and maintenance of neighborhood character.
H2.3. Develop consistent, precise, fair and enforceable regulations that maintain environmental quality
. and public health and safety standards, while minimizing housing development costs.
f Housing Policy H2.5. Provide incentives for safe and decent housing that is in close proximity to jobs,
transportation and daily activities.
Goal H.3a Develop a variety of housing options for all economic groups
Policy H3.2 Ensure that the design of infill development preserves the character of the neighborhood.
Goal ED.Sb Promote publiclprivate partnerships that encourage innovation and creativity in the
economic expansion of our region. .
Policy ,
ED.5.6 Review development regulations continuously to assure clarity, consistency, predictability and
direction. Provide opportunities for citizens to initiate amendments to inconsistent, outdated,
inappropriate or unnecessary or confusing regulations. Amendments shall be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
IVEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER:
Ponderosa: Low density residential designed for on-premises rnaintenance of a limited number of
horses. Heavily wooded with rugged terrain in parts. Expansion to the northwest precluded because
of the Dishman Natural Area and terrain. Over 95% of lots fully developed. Some remain vacant
because of topography. Rotchford: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited number of
horses. Terrain is relatively flat east of Sullivan Road with steep hillside limiting any easterly expansion. Equine easements provided on local streets. Subdivision is fully developed.
Preservaiion of Existing Resldential Subdivisians (UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDIfdGS Revised
' August 1, 2005
3of5
Social Character: Well-organized and cohesive neighborhoods.
DESIGN QUALITY: Local access and residential collectors designed to accommodate lots of
approximately one acre. Direct access to public streets. Single-family housing is well-maintained ~
and designed for residential privacy. A limited number of large animals, especially horses is a design
fheme in both neighborhoods.
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan is under review. Spokane Valley has not yet
established performance or design standards to assure the quality of residential design to
preserve neighborhood character pursuant to this Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:
Wastewater. Limited access to public sewer in the Ponderosa. Balance of property relies on septic
systems. Rotchford Acres relies entirely on septic systems. Re-subdivision to increase residential
densities should not be permitted absent an organized wastewater collection and treatment system.
Potable Water. Ponderosa is served by Spokane County Water District #3, Rotchford by Vera Irrigation
Dist. #14, both Group "A" Community Water Systems. Re-subdivision to increase residential densities
will require adequate supply and pressure for domestic consumption and fire protection.
Stormwater: the Ponderosa subdivision has intermittent streams that drain to Chester Creek. The
contribution of to the rate and volume of flows from additional impervious cover resulting from re-
subdivision could result in an environmental damage as yet undetermined for which mitigation would
need to be established in a planned and coordinated manner. Similar concerns concerning drainage
which could affect Saltese Creek. A significant stream traversing the neighborhood has been
reclassified as a Type 4 stream by the Department of Natural Resources Division of Fish and Wildlife.
The implications of this change have not been assessed. The Federal Emergency Management
Agency proposes to release draft floodplain maps affecting Chester Creek (Ponderosa) in the Fall of
2005. Similar remapping of Saltese Creek is expected in early 2006.
Erodible soils: Both the Rotchford and Ponderosa subdivisions include or abut geological hazard
areas which require further evaluation prior to allowing additional residential densities.
Native Vegetation/habitat: Ponderosa includes areas of wildlife critical habitat for White Tail Deer and
threatened species.
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan is under review. Spokane Valley has not yet
established performance or design standards to assure the continued preservation of
environmental quality in outlying areas with limited. public infrastructure and specific
environmental conditions, such as steep slopes, intermittent flooding and highly erodible soils.
PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY:
Access: Ponderosa: Property lies west of the Union Pacific Railroad with only two points of access.
Additional access should be required prior to any increase in residential densities for evacuation and
emergency services. The evaluation of access will be inc4rporated in the Natural Hazard Mitigation
Plan under development by the City of Spokane Valley in the Fall and Winter of 2005-2006.
Animal Maintenance: The requirements for the maintenance and upkeep of even a limited number of
large animals raises issues of compatibility resulting from noise, odor, proximity to residential
structures, flies, etc.. These issues are compounded with increased residential densifies and
requirements for buffering for any additional residential densities may be required.
' Landfill: Ponderosa: The proximity of a closed landfill to an increased number of residences requires ,
additional sfudy. '
;
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan is under review. Spokane Valley has not yet
established performance or design standards to assure continued compatible principal and
Preservation of Existing Residential Subdivislons (UR-1 Interim Zoning)
. FINDWGS RevisQd
August 1, 2005
4 af5
accessory land uses within residential neighborhoods in conformance with the draft
Comprehensive Plan.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
. Current property owners purchased property with notice of existing regulations pertaining to the
keeping of large animals. The Short Plat process requires notice only to adjacent property owners.
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA): Ordinance No. 48 (effective
March 31, 2003) adopted on an interim basis by reference the Spokane Environmental
Ordinance (Spokane County) thereby implementing the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA) and Chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) within the
jurisdictional limits of the City of Spokane Valley. An Environmental checklist was
completed and a Determination of Non-Significance was issued on April 26, 2004.
Conclusions were based on the finding that a regulation preserving the status quo would
have no adverse environmental impact.
Conclusion(s):
Permitting piecemeal increase in residential densities without the establishment of
performance and design standards raise serious issues related to preservation of
neighborhood character and design, maintaining environmental quality, public health and
safety, and the adequacy of public notice, which require additional study prior to the
establishment of permanent regulation.
. III. DECISION
The Interim UR-1 Residential Estate Zoning adopted pursuant to Spokane Valley Ordinance 04-
035 should be extended for an additional six months pending completion of environmental
review and the development of performance and design standards to preserve neighborhood
character, maintain environmental quality, and to ensure the continued health, safety and
welfare of the areas pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 following a public hearing before the Planning
Commission. Resolution of issues shall be accomplished in accordance with the revised
Workplan attached as Exhibit "C." ,
Proserrat(on of ExlsUrtg Residential Subdivisions (UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDINGS Revised
August 1, 2005
- SofS
Spokane Valley Planning Commission ~
~ Draft Minutes ~
Council Chambers - City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Ave
August 25, 2005
1. CALL TO ORDER
Commissioner Crosby called the meeting to order at 6:02 pm.
Staff attending the meeting: Marina Sukup, Director of Community Development,
Greg McCormick, Planning Manager and Deanna Griffith, Administrative
Assistant
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Commission, audience, and staff recited the Pledge of Allegiance.
III. ROLL CALL
Fred Beaulac - Present Bill Gothmann - Present
Bob Blum - Present Gail Kogle -Present
' John G. Carroll - Present lan Robertson - Absent, excused
David Crosby - Present
~ APPROVAL OF AGENDA '
Commissioner Gothmann moved that the August 25, 2005 agenda 6e
approved as writfen. Commissioner Blum seconded the mation. Motion
passed unanimously.
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES •
!t was moved by Commissioner Gothmann seconded by Commissioner
Kogle that the minutes of the August, 2005, Planning Commission meeting
be accepted as writfen. Motion passed unanimously. ,
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
No Public Comment
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
Commissioner Gothmann attended the city council meeting on Aug. 9, 2005.
During the Budget discussion showed that the projected income will be greater
than projected expenses. Commissioner Crosby reported that he had been
interviewed by Tom Benemann Sunday for short spot on the 6:00 pm news. All
other commissioners had nothing to report.
August 25, 2005 Planning Cammission Minutes Page 1 of 5
Spnkune Valley Plnnning Cotiueussion Minutes
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
None.
~
VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS '
.A. OLD BUSINESS:
None .
B. New Business -
Public Hearing for the Extension of a 6-month Interim Zoning to maintain
UR-1 in the Ponderosa and Rotchford Acres areas.
Commissioner Crosby opened the Hearing at 6:10 pm
Chuck Hafner, 4710 S. Woodruff, Mr. Hafner stepped forward to say that
he and his neighbors grateful for the City's involvement in their
neighborhood and supporting their efforts to maintain the zoning and
other development matters concerning their area.
, AJ Tondini, 4515 S. Farr Rd. Mr. Tondini states his is a 34 yr resident of
the Ponderosa area and moved there for the large lots and all of the
amenities that are present in the neighborhood. He hopes that the
Commission will vote favorably regarding the passing of this extension.
Gail Stilltner, 10119 E. 44'", Moved to the Ponderosa area to achieve the
life style that is developed there. Still feels betrayed by the County for the changes they made. She makes a plea to the Commission to approve '
. the interim zoning to help them try and keep their life style before it is lost
for ever.
Commissioner Beaulac makes a motion that based on the findings of fact
the Commission recommends to Council the approval of the 6 month
extension of the Interim Zoning in the Ponderosa and Rotchford areas.
Commissioner Carroll seconds, passed unaminous. Commissioner
Crosby declares the public hearing closed at 6:22 pm.
Continuance of the comprehensive plan deliberations - no public
comments.
Discussion of retuming to the begining of the land use chapter and
discussion the first two goals and accompanying policies. Staff will
rewrite to reflect new verbiage-as was requested to see if they could be
consolidated, We will not revisit this now but when we cover the plan as
a whole for all c4rrections made,
Mr. Basinger gave an over view of the land use map and some of the
sub-maps that he has been working on. Discussion of missed marks
under PubliclQuasi-Public, Non-conforming uses. We will go over each
comment request that are map related. List of all map related maps is
listed below.
August 25. 2005 Planning Commission Page 2 of 5
' Spob:sne Valley PlxnninyCommi~sicm \4inut*
~
_ ~
~
, M 1, M-30a regardmg a splrt zone. Change both parcels to mixed-use.
L~ Approved ,
m-2, m-30g - approved
m-3, comment only on approving designation
. m-4, approved change to mixed-use. Mirabeau Parkway named an
aesthetic corridor during the transportation chapter. ,
m-5, will be chaged to office,
covered all parcels specific comments first then review the more general
requests.
m-8, change to office
m-13a, change to LDR
m-13b, change to Neighborhood Commercial
m-13c, m-23, change to Office
m-13d, change to mixed use m-13e, m-30f, change to office m-30e, change to MDR
m-17, leave as LDR
m-18, change to mixed-use
m-24, change to office
m-27, leave as community commercial
m-30b, change to HDR
break
M-6, m-7 same, comment only on approval of proposed designation
m-10, request staff contact citizen and get a more specific request
Commissioner Beaulac made a motion to extend the worlcing time to 9:15
pm, second by Commissioner Kogle, passed.
m-11, comment only on approval of proposed designation
m-14, Ponderosa change to UR-1, need to wait until appeals have run
though the processes.
m-15, change to mixed-use
M-19, will cut area between Dartmouth and Farr, Sprague to Appleway
from City Center, change to Regional Commercial with the proposed
Auto-Row overlay.
m-20, 21 & 22 are inline with the request of m-10,. staff to contact citizens
and get better definition.
m-28, support a change to corridor mixed-use
~ m-29, change to regional commercial
August 25, 2005 Planning Commission Page 3 of 5
Spoksne V:dley Planning Cnmmission Vfinuies ~
- ~
M 32, Barker is not a designated truck route.
. . T
Requests.
No. Na e Comment
M;~1 James H. Weber S lit zoned arcel...wants all designated commercial
John Svreitzer,
M;~2 Sweitzer Com an , Inc. Proerties should be desi nated cammercial
Kerry Orcutt Su orts Office designation along Evergreen Road
Requests "Business Park" comp plan cakegory, or Mixed Use
John G. Miller, desgination for flexibility and to recognize current and projected
M-4 Pincroft Business Park develo ment
John T. Peterson, Pdng Property desginated HDR in 2003. Office under oonstruction.
M~5 Cor . Re uests Communit Commercial Desi nation.
M-6 Ker Orcutt Su orts Office desi nation alon Ever reen Road
M-T David Gum Su orts Office desi nation alon Ever reen Road
M-8 Paul S. Redlin Re uests Communi Commercial
Property is single-family homes and duplexes and should be
Helen Sar ent returned to UR-3.5 zonin .
~VI-11 David Orahood Su orts 1 acre zonin in Ponderosa. Su orts im act fees.
Mr~r2 . Ski . _~d "IM
Comp Plan Amendment changed designation to Com Com in
J. Grant Person 2003 - Ma in Error M-1>3 B J. Grant Person Proert currentl zoned B-2, should retain zonin .
: Portion of property fronting Vercler proposed Office, balance J. Grant Person MDR
Northem section of property suited for high density wikh Officc
bQardering Mansfield. Officelassembly on southern portion.
M-1~3 D~ J. Grant Person Mixed Use desin tion would be a roriate.
Property rezoned to UR-22 specifically for office use_ Property
M 13„E _ J. Grant Person directly south zoned UR-7 for hos ice facili .
Chuck Hafner, Supports Comp Plan as drafted. Wants areas to retain R-1
Deanna Hormann zonin .
Robert J. Bo le Su orts Mixed Use desi nation for roerteast of Valle Mall.
~ David Golden Portion oi property fronting Vercler proposed Office, balance
M;16 Jan Wesche MDR
M-1;7~c Danett L. Mar eris Owner would like to build mini stora e on r~ opefil.
Owner wants to use property for commercial on Barker with
Verona Southem remainder used for multi-famil . Currenl zoned UR-22.
Letter suggests that a new category be added called City Center
F.J. Dullanty Jr. Reserve.
` Requests UR-7 designation for property developed with
~ "KS duplexes (Pinecroft) and for propeRy recently approved for a
Ma20 Helen Sar ent subdivision View Ranch Estates .
~ M~211 Jill Enzler Wants propeLty zoned back to UR-3.5.
Requests UR-7 designation for property knovrn as View Ranch
2 Linda Gerkin Estates.
~ Portion of property fronting Vercler proposed Office, balance ,
~ Mf1~23 r Jan and David Wesche MDR
August 25, 2005 Planning Commission Page 4 of 5
Spok9nc Valley Planning Commission A9inatGs
. Property is developed with offlce building. Owner would like to
` J . M-2,4 Eric Ellin sen, DDS ex and /develo offic~es on pro pert directl north.
Andenv Warlock, CLC See M-24
M-25 Associates
M~26 Ga Johnson See M-24
Should noi downzone this, or any, property within the Ciry of
M;,2+7 Dwi ht J. Hume S okane Valle .
Pines Road not marketable for office development_ Should
M-28 Dwi ht J. Hume retain a ro riate commercial zonin .
Area currently zoned Heavy Industrial and designated Urban
Activity Center on Interim Comp Plan. Should be designated
Reg. Commercial for expansion of commercial businesses in the
. M-29 Dwi ht J. Hume future.
Split zoned parcel. Designated entire parcel Corridor Mixed
M-30A Plannin Staff Use. _
' Property currently pending Hearing Examiner decision for
M~O.B Planning Staff rezone.
Property received Comp Plan Amendment to Communtiy
M-30C~ Plannin Staff Commercial in 2004.
~ Property received Comp Plan Amendment to High Density
Residential for office usel in 2004. Property to the south
M-30D Plannin Staff currenl has office constructed on it.
, M,:30E Plannin Staff Pro ert should be designated for residential uses.
M-3_OF Plannin Staff Propert y previously zoned for Office use.
~ Parcels are adjacent to Post Office and are isolated from
residential neighbhorhood, bounded by Barker, Appleway and
M~30G Plannin Staff Laber
iffM N Shirle Rademacker poes not want Barker Rd. desi nated as truck route.
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
Commissioner Carroll thanked everyone for allowing a further review of the ffirst
two goals and accompanying goals.
XI. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Gothmann motioned for adjournment, seconded by Commissioner
Blum to adjoum at 9:15 pm. Passed
SUBMITT'ED: APPROVED:
~
Deanna Grrffith, Administrative Assistant David Crosby, Chairman
August 25, 2005 Planning Commission Page 5 0( 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 09-06-05 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Proposed Resolution 05-019 Amending Resolution 05-018,
November Ballot Issue
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: .
Council approved Resolution 05-018 to direct the County Auditor to place the matter of the
Spokane Valley Council Salary Schedule on the November 8, 2005 ballot. A revised Resolution, amending the form of the ballot title, is necessary to ensure the ballot title
complies with State law.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve Resolution 05-019.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Connelly, City Attarney
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution-05-019
, , .
CITY QF SFQK.ANE VALLEY
SPOKAIVE COUNTY, WASHTNGTON
12ESOLUTIbN 05-019
A RESnI..UTION OF 1Hti CITY COiJNCL[., OF 'lliE CiTY OF SPQKANF Vr1T.,LEY,
WABHTYGTON, DIRECT1NG TFIE SPOKA.NF COUN717Y AUll1TUK TQ PLACF TSE
AZATTI:R OF A.DOPTIO\i UF A CITY OF SPOKANE VAL,i,EY COU\YCT.L SALt1.RY
SCtfE DULE ON THF NOVEMI3EK 8, 2005 BALLOT TiN O.R.nER TO RE.FER THE, Qi1E, STTQN
TC) TIiE QUALIFIED EIIFCTORS OF TIiL CITY FOR APPRQVAT.. OR REJh:CT10N.
VMFREA,S, This Resolution is necessary to amenci the ballot language contained in Resolution
Oa-OIS to ensure compliance with Washington Sia[c T.aw; ancl
W1-irRFAS, Spokane Valley Urdinance 04-018 (repcaling ordinance No 14) established that
each city councilinember shall be entitled to receive a salary of'$400.00 per month and the mayor shall be
entitled to a salary of $500.00 per month; and
NV11FREt1S, Spokane Valley Ordinance 04-018 created llle Independent Salary Commission f-or
the purpose of reviewing iu1d establishing the salarics af;tlac Mayor and Councilmembers; and
NVHEREAS, the Independent Salary Commission filed its salary schedule wich the City Clerk
who published the samc August 6 tuid 13, 2004, with the August 13, 2004 datc cousiclered the official
filing date of the salary schedulc; anci
~ l .
` W1-ILREAS, the published salary sehed«le was subject to referendum petition by the people of
the City; and that a petition was filcd with the City Clerk September 10, 2004, whicli was within thirty
(30), days after the official filing daCe of the salary schedule; which was then filcd with the Spokitne
County Auditor's Office September 13, 2004; and '
Wr[ERE-AS, Septeinber 17, 2004, City of Spokane Valley staff tivas informcd that the elections
oftice was not aUle to verify the Sufficicncy of the petition and the number of valid sigr~aiures wittiin clie
. time necessary to place such measure on the November, 2004 ballot, and thus the matter would be placcd
on the November. 2005 ballot: and
WHCREAS, the Spokane Caunty Elections 17e_pvttnent in letter datcd $eptember 23, 2004,
fonnally advised the City of Spokane Valley that the petitions submitted met t}ie sufficiency previsions
within RCVI' 354.29.170 and 35A.01.040 anci that the number of valid signatures rnet the rninimum
required under RCW 35A.1l.110, ancl cert:i.fied as per RCW 35A.01.040 that the date the eertification
process began was vlonday, September 13, 2004.
INIOW THEREFORE; be it resolved by the City CAUncil of the City ef Spokane Valley, Spokane
Cnunty, Washington, that Council hereby requests the Spokane County Auditor to place the following
proposition on the Novembe.r 8, 2005 ballot for the eitizens of Spnkane Valley's consideration:
ResolutiAn 05-019 to Plxce Salary Measure on Ballot (amending 05-0 13) Noe I pf2
The City Council of Spokane Valley passed ordinancc Oat-018 concerning the adoption of a
salaiy schedule on August 13, 2004 and the voters have filed a suffeienk referendum petition
on this ordinance. Ordinance 04-018 would adnp[ the Salary Convnission reconunendtltions changing the Mayor's salary from $500.00 per month to $1200 per month; the Deputy lvfayror's
salary fi-om S400.00 pee month to $ 1. 000.00 per month; and each Cnuneilmember's salary from
$400.00 per month to $900.00 per month; all with no automatic annual cost of living increasc.
Should this ordinance be:
Approvecf
Itejecte.d
Adopted this 6'b day of September, 2005.
City of Spokane VaIley
nTT T;'ST:
Diana Wilhite, Mayor
(:hristine Bair►bridge, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Ofifice of City Attorney '
i
Resolutior► 05-019 to Place Salary Ivleasure on Ballot (amending 05-01S) Page 2 of 2
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 6, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
x information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
• AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Highlights of 2006 Budget
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Council will hear a brief presentation from each Department Director relative to that
department's overall budget.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS: 2006 Preliminary Budget Department Highlights PowerPoint Presentation
t_ J
,
2006 Preliminary Budget
Department Highlights City of Spokane Valley
Department Directors
September 6, 2005
Executive & Legislative
Support (pp. 37-38) . o Draft a well-defined Street Master Plan, with
funding options
o Initiate the first phase of the Sprague
Corridor Revitalization Plan
o Continue monitoring significant wastewater
issues
o Maintain a strong emphasis on internal and
external communication
o Explore the available telecommunications
infrastructure
,
;
1
~
• • ~ Public Safety (pp. 39-41)
o Partner with regional leaders to
establish a proactive community
educational gang-related awareness
and treatment program
o Partner with Spokane County in
enhancing departmental and regional
public safety training z
Operations & Admin.
Services (pp. 42-45)
o Review and revise City°s processes
o Implement initial elements of community communications program, including
_ standardizing City publications and printed
materials
o Continue to refine the multi-year financial
plan process by comparing revenue
estimates with other area agencies
o Identify available telecommunications
infrastructure that is/could be available in
the area for use by citizens and businesses
3
1
i
i
2
\ .
Operations & Admin. Services, continued (pp.42-45)
o Integrate information from A-87 cost
allocation plan into the City budget
o Draft/revise ordinances and contracts in
support of all City departments
o Expand City's web based intranet to help
provide employees with resources and tools
to improve interdepartmental cooperation
o Develop personnel handbook to inform
employees of personnel related policies and .
procedures
o Provide training opportunities for employees
4 Public Works
General Fund (pp. 46-47)
o Analyze and review with the County, City of
Spokane, and the Wa. St. Department of _
Ecology regarding Wastewater Treatment
Facility options
o Work with the Regional Wastewater
Committee to evaluate the possibilities of a
Spokane Regional Wastewater Alliance
o Develop the Six-Year Transportation
Improvement Plan (TIP) for Council
adoption ,
o Update street design standards
5
3
~ .
Public Works
Street Fund (p. 57)
o Improve signal timing coordination
throughout the City
. o Complete a street inventory and
. assessment of all City streets and
- allow development of a six year street
master plan and a 20-year pavement management plan in 2007
6
~J
Public Works
.
- Stormwater (p. 68)
o Design and implement solutions for
existing drainage problems
• o Complete six year plan for
construction of regional and semi-
regional drainage facilities '
. o Adopt and implement the Regional
Stormwater Design Manual
7
~J
4
Public Works Capital Projects (pp. 63-67)
Description City Funds Other Funds Total
Road 1,754,940 10,953,060 12,708,000
Design/Const.
Road 358,428 2,830,415 3,188,843
Preservation
Projects
Barker Road 558,000 55$,000
Bridge
Road Paveback 500,000 . 500,000
CenterPlace 783,205 783,205
Total $2,613,368 $15,124,680 $17,738,048
a
Planning/Community
Development (pp.48-50)
o Update the Shoreline Master Program
o Complete regulations implementing the
Comprehensive Plan within the Uniform
Development Code • o Establish criteria for the AutoRow overlay
district
o Complete pavement cut tracking system
. o Implement full enforcement of adopted sign
regulations
o Complete Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
9
5
Parks & Recreation
(pp. 51-55)
o Master Plan
• incorporate results in4o Recreation Programming and Pollcy
• pursue implementation of capital projects
• evaluate reoommendations in the Pool Feasibility Study for
improving existing pools '
o Pursue grant opportunities for CenterPlace and parks improvements
o Increase public awareness of CenterPlace and
Senior Center
o Complete Marketing Plan and materials for
CenterPlace
o Complete Policies and Procedure Manual for
CenterPlace.
,o
~
General Government (p. 56)
Includes Funding for:
o Annual audit
o Election costs
o City liability & property insurance
o Transfers to:
G Parks capital .
- 0 Civic building • Street maintenance
o Voter registration
o Impact fee study
o Outside agencies
o Contingency
„
6
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
J Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 6 September 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: p consent p old business p new business ❑ pubHc liearfng
{]x infarmation ❑ admin. report [I pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Amend Master Fee Schedule
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Master Fee Sch2dule
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: ' Resolution No. 05-011 BACKGROUND: Currently the Master Fee Sth@dule requires the collection of a Plan Review
Fee prior to perForming the plan review. This entails a complex calculation, delaying the
application process at the Permit Center counter and requires the applicant to write several
checks through the process. Approved accounting procedures require one person to calculate fees and a second person to
collect those fees.
These two requirements combine to not only slow down the application process, but it tends to
disrupt the work Flow for the Permit Center, especially when we are busy.
~ In addition, currentiy, during the plan review function, actual project valuation is determined
and the actual Plan Review Fee is finalized. Many times filiis results in a fee adjustrnent. ' That
fee adjustment is combined with the permit fee and collected at the time of permit issuance.
When an application for a project is received at the Permit Center, the applicant isplanning on
going forward with the development. The instances of a project stopping once the application
is received and the plan review is accomplished are very rare. Speeding this process up by
allowing all of our Permit Specialists to function as Cashiers and not requiring them to calculate
fees prior to determining counter completeness for commercial applications, will more than
make up for a project that doesn't go forward once the plan review is finished. And the
applicant would only write one check. If we were to allow applicadons to be processed without first paying the Plan Review Fee, the
resulting economy may give us a 50% increase in available labar to process those applications,
increasing our customer response and derreasing errors in the application process. Sincc the
final valuation calculation is done by the Plans Examiner, the accounting control is maintained.
In the instances where we are issuing a permit over the counter, we will maintain the required
controls by having a second Permit Specialist, Plans Examiner or Building Official perform or
review the calculations resulting in the appropriate fee. This proposal has been reviewed and approved by Mr. Thompson. ,
Staff is proposing to eliminate the language from the Master Fee Schedule, Schedule C, page 8
under Plan Review Fees:
Fecs are to be collected at the time of receiving the applicafion for permit if the plans
review fec is nver $50.00. lf less than $50.00, it may be collected at the time of perniit
~ issuance.
and:
Flaus review fecs arc nnt refundable once the plan review has beeu started. This fee is in
adclition to the full basic fee. The «'SBCC fec is to be eollected at this time.
Staff would propose the following language to be substituted for the deleted language:
Plan Iteview N"ees shall be collectecl at the time of permit issu:inr.e alongwitti the VVS13C f'ee.
OPTIONS: .
1. Move forward with a resolution to amend the language in the Master Fee Schedule.
2. Keep the current language in the Master Fee Schedule as it is.
3. Establish other language within the Master Fee Schedule that would fix a Plan Review Fee deposit, such as $300.00, eliminaring the required initial calculation.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Support a resolution amending the language
in the Master Fee Schedule to allow the payment of the Plan Review Fee at the time
of permit issuance.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Permit Center would be more efficient in processing
complicated applications. The gain in efficiency and customer service would more than make .
up for any loss in plan review fees due to an abandoned project. %
STAFF CONTACT: Spokane Valley Building Official Scholtens
ATTACH M E NTS: •
Power Point
~
! 1
Building Divisian
Plan Review Fee Collection
- September 6, 2005 . .
Process
; . ~
~
CURRENT
Cuxlpmer InQuhy
Cvstorner tnqulry PROPOSED
k '
R:! 0 r~1
~ '
Prc-ApplicatioT Cacsicrcncc
Mpfcan Submits PrrAPPlication CoMerence
kppli lian
Peimlt Spec Log -LeJ Applicant Pays
mz •
Plan Check Fee CakutaSion ~+n Check tcc Ca r Rppl6cani Submiis Perntil S c lag -In
• COh1FLETE Appliwtion
• ~ I! .
11 nin Fn In erin Othe~r ' encles Flre
Pten Reulew
Pla in En in cri Ottycr cncics, Frc Plan RevitrN
~
- App6cant Pays Ca: iler PCrmil Spet Plan Review Pemut Calwta:tan ~
Permit Ftso Plan Clteck Adjust.men4 Applicartt pays Plan permi^Spec ' Plan Chec9d Plan Rericw
Check & Pcmnit Fcc Feimi? Calculat.ion
. ~ -
• - - ~
Bv(Iding Pern* Is:ued BnAlding Pemut Issued
i ,
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 6, 2005 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : General Budget Discussion
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
As part of the ongoing budget process, City Manager Mercier will present updated budget data
as an opportunity for Council to provide initial feedback.
OPTIOIdS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS Updated budget sheets
~1
CI'TY OF SP'OKA.NE Y1V,,LEY - 2006 BLiDGET
Table of Contenb
Budget Messa=e
Cotmcilmcmbers & Staff 1
Budget Introduciion 2
City Mnnager Budget Msssage 4
Budget Caide
Atwut the Budget & tbc Budget Proeess 12
Spokxnc Vallcy Budget Policies 15
Basis nf Accouniing and Budgeting 16
Explanaiion of Rcvcauc Sources 18
Budget Sammary
Revcnue Assumpdnns 22
Expandituiz Assumptioas 23
Budget Summsry 24
Revenues by Type 25
GeneRil Fund Revenuc Saurcts Ghari 26
City - Wide Rcvenue Sources Chart 27
Detail Reveaucs by Typc 28
Expcnditures by llcpartmcat 31
Gtneral Pund Expenditures by Departmeni by Typc 32
Gcneral Fund Expcnditures by Ikpartmcnt Chart 33
Generul Fund Expenditures by 'I'ype Chart 34
Fipendltnres
Gtncral Fund:
Legi.4letive Branch 35
Executive dt I..egislstive Support 37
Public Safety 39
C ontract F.xTsesxiitures C t►an 41
Opcrations & Administrative Scrvicc.s 42
i'ublic Works 46
Plrmning & Community Development 48
Faris & Rccreation 51
Gcttctal Govemment 56
A1l 4thcr Fumds:
Street Fund 57
Artcrial Strcct Fund 58
Trnils 8t Paths Fund 58
HoteUMatel Fund 59
CenterPlacc Opcrating Resen•e Fund 60
Sczvice Level Stgbilizalion Resmv Fund 60
Winter Wcathcr Reseive Fund 61
GTtY OF SPOK4NF V ALLEY - 2006 BUDGET
Tabk ot Cantents
Debt Service Funds 62
Capital E'rojects 8t Spexial Capital Projects Eunds 61
Strnet Capital Projccts Fund 6-:
Mirabcau Point Capital Project Fund 6`
Stiei Band Fund 6
Capical Grants Fund &I
Barker 8ridge - Fcd Grani Fund 6r,
Psrks Cspilal Frojects Fund b^
Civic Bui.ldings Cspital Projed Fund 6"
Stormwaer Manegcmenl Fund bS
CquiPment Reata! & Rtplacemcnt Fund 6` ~
Risk Managemeal Fund
City Profdc & Otbcr Badget I.nformatim
All Olhcr Futtci5 Capital Expendittues i i
Aositian I.isting by Department 72
Full Time Equivalent Couat by Year 73
2005 R'orkforce Camparison 74
Comaiunity Profilc and History 7..
Bud$zt Ordinxnce - missiag 7?:
Fmployoe Salary Schec3ule 81
Debl Senricc Schodule 8'
c
C1TY OF SAOKAKE VALLEY
City Council Members
Diana Wilhite, Mnyor Richard Munson, Depaty
Position # 1 Position #5
Step6en Taylor Michae! Flanigao
Positioa Position #b
Mic6ael DeVleming Richard Denenny
Pasition #3 Aosition #7
Gsry Sc6immels
Position #4
Stsffi
Uavid Mercier, City Manager
Nna Regor. Deputy City Manager
Kenneth Thompson, Finance & Administrative Services Duector
Marina Sukvp, Community Development Director
Michael Jackson, Parks & Recrealion Director
Neil Itersteo, Public Works Di.rector
Cary Driskeil, Deputy City Attorney
Thomas Scholtens, Building Official
Chrisiine Bauibridge, City Cleric
t
City ut Spokaae Vsllcy
Introduction ot the F"1r' 2006 Preliminary Bndgct
Prepared By David Mercicr. City Manager
Augnat 23,2005
A. U is ►ny plrasrrre 1o sub»rit n bataaccd preliminary budger for Cotawil
considrrcuiorc This Mudget proposol ocb:owledges ilef'iscel co,utrvir,ls ajthe Cin, und
concei►traues on sustnining cvre prngram respnrisfhilitles, consistent with directionfrom
the City Council.
B. Again lhis yvm, the Ci1y ('aunci! Finaru:t Committee has worked close!y wirh
adininistrative stv,ff fn excmrining and understandmg the budget c.onstruction process, the
cost cvntrol meJhods applied lo the emerging budgel, vnd thr ftnoncinl data upon which
the budget is bused
C. As prexcribed by Clty Councfl, rhefrve (3) spectfic goals for Council and staff
joc us and accomplishmenl rn 2006 are to:
• Dmft a wv-defiaed trmt Mutera witb Fandinp nations, that identifics the
currznt conditiun of city smwts and cocommcnds upprapriistc impmvcmcnts nnd
maintcnante the3t preselvo the value and ssrudvral intrgrity of the local transportati4n
n'stem
• Inhiate the FUwt Phtn of the Sanwns Carridor Revitaliradoa Pbmnia= botwcea
University and the frecway by contrsceing with a oonsutlant Go dcsign s strategy that
would str+cngthcn lho ocoaamic vinhifity of the c.ocridar.
• Coeftoe Maahoriag Slgnifitant Watew#ter Issaea inclnding governance of
wastcwatu facilitics, enhanced citizen ewarcncss of options for the futwc and pucsuit of
the most eflicicm and acanomical use of allowai wastrwatcr disc;hargcs.
• NLIntaIn a Stron9 ENIpb"ll an Interul aad EztcnW Commanicatian uiilizing the
Public Infocmation Otficcr and dcpartmcnt hcad positions to cr►hnncc the quality,
timtliness and aceuracy of internal dialoguc sael the informatian pmvide-d te citiuns
sbaut city issues, initiniivcs and wotic plsns.
• E:plarr the As-albbk Tekeommtinipatiflns lnfraatracturo theL tney bc acxussod by
public institutians, resicicnts and husincsses within S}okenc Vallcy.
D. Cansenwive fiscal pulrcies geared loward the utluinment nJlong-term ftnnnclal
heallh for the Cnry are recommended jor adoption in the Firal Blutgel. Meeting the
targels estahlished by lhese fiaral pvlicirs require n c-vmmitmen► tr,, jund onl y rho.Cf IFvels
ojservice rhat are fisra!!v suslainahle.
E. Thls PrelinriRary Budget adheres to thefirwlly responsihlz principles estahlishcd
in 2004. :Seti•eral measures worthv nf c-nmment are:
~
1. lltc uulLranun of wuservauvt reve►iuc proJectious anci rwlisLll
forecasts in the coasvuctian of this budgd proposal--m wr euard againsc !:>ca,
disapPuinlmcncs.
The constraitri of programmatic growth--no ncw pmgrams.
3. lbe commitment to end the year with a positive fimd balwi::e ir; a!1 liinds.
4. Thc marl:cting of CeatffPlace to defray year-mund operaiional expenses.
5. Peric►dically updating the six-ycar financial foreeast to ale.rt the city to ftsc:a]
trends.
F. Several positive fiscu! rndreatnrs arc rc,flerltcl in the 17r~~pose•d I'relimiruuti-
Budgel. They inelude.
1. Incrca.sts in salcs tax reccipGs ascribcd to a stncngthening ec;ononiy.
2. No ncw debt-wz are operaling on a pay-as-you go basis.
3. Cantinucd leveraging of state and federal fwsds ta roduce tbc cast of local capital
imprvvencnts borne by city Tcsidents resulted in an $9% ssvings.
4. Closely rontrolling the numbet af new employecs hired-na ncw po5itians arc
propc*sed for FY 2006.
G. The remaining action sleps towurd acloptivn of the budRel im l ude:
1. August 30: Outside agcncies presentstions.
2. Septembcr 6: Dcpartmcatal highlights and work program pre5entations.
3. Scptemtxt 13 Gcneral Budget Discussion
4. Septernbex 27: Putrlic hearing to take citiun commcnt on tbe'_Q(ki
PToPosed budgcL
5. Scptember 27: First rcading of the Praposad Propetty Tax t.,cvptig
Ordingnce.
b. Ociotitr 11: A final public hearing an the ptvposed budget.
7. Ociober 18: Second reading of the Nroposod Propcity Tax Lc~~•in:~
Ordinance
8. October l$: Adoption of the Propascd Fae K,e.4olution.
9. Oriober 18: First reading of the Pmposcd 2b06 Budgct +!rciin;inte.
I~;~,~,:~c, ~„t~~;..•
10. Novembcr 15: Socond reading of the Proposccl '(106
11. Novembcr 15: Adoption of the FY 2006 Bud~~,
IL As a budget adoption follaw-up activity, a City Caunri!-,Stafj Retreu! i.s s( ; r
,fOT Fehru jr•, ! I ?I)I►( ;11 whrch rim;• nn. :w_Iatc'd c;r vrrlr fm.7ri f17I 6)I'er-rf.ct wrl!
revirwc,.
1. ! itc P ) .:00 1?;., • 1 . . . , . . , , . . .
ntind of Nnkember 7. 'c~
,
,
A %rt~e-wwr forecast uj the Gity's frnunrial healih was mude ro rreute u snapshal
aj the City s Inng-rerm fiscul conditian so dat today's bieclget chvices arre nat
made wilhow awareness of the Tnancial rrencis 1ixrt rr,~ject the surtained
ffordahility oJ publlc services. .S`taff worked in close consullattun wlth rhe
Finance (_'omminer and rhe City Cour,ctl exanrini,rg o vurfeh, of exlc•ndlture
redurtian and revemie enhuncement scenarfns in search oJa JormrJa rhat would
supporl currenr seruic8 levels inlo 1he future. 77ie farecact Is regularlv apdirted to
ca~turt curnnt infarmation use.jul in dccisfarr nwbng. .9lthough fmproved
Tnancial data has been incorporated [1+e frndings stUl show Q structurul
imbalunce between revenvcs and exJaensex wlth whiCh we nrust rerkon
Advancemeot of the tnteresb of Spnkane Yallrv thruuPfi F.fTective &ternal Relatiou such
as building a conswctive rctationship with the crewly-composed Rcxird of Councy
Cammissionas; parficipeting as ful) mcmbcrs of regional aad
statewide boards and Gommissions whosc wark affects the quslity nf
life in thc aommunity. and by advocating City issues wit}i
neighborins: iuri`.c?1~!It)!1~_ I?:U711Cw3l i}il!3:1!7aill?f15. t}l: ~ CriS~:si!!t"4
and Congrc • _
.
r
Cuwici! t4lembers serve vn regtonui '>;,;,rd-, .Iml
commisslnns. Bnth Crnrnefl mxl staff have initiated arnr
mainlained conlact with their counlerpurls locally, statewich
and nationalfy about the isstee.~s that matter mnst to Spokrrne -
i'dIey 7he citv manoger attends weekly briefrng sessions -
GetweEn Caunry staff and Canemissiarrers In an effort 1o bufld
effectiue and infornrned relatinnshipc that leud to rnis.rnuctiiw
solutiores jor Ci1y~ i~•.~-ues.
CotlaborAtioo w-ith WAStrwater Dischareera and RrQnlitorv APencies in pursuit of inte,-rim
and lnng-tern rcsolutiow to water qualitr and wastcwacer treatment capncity concerns. -so that
ernnamic cievelopmcni and natural resauras continuc to suppart tfie vitality of tbe region.
An incredJble umnunt of lirne mnd eaergy 6y C.'vurncil and staff wara imwsted in
rer7rw ojpolenfially workable interim and long-rcmge solutions 1n wastewater
treatment problems. Significunl ongning rnllalxiratiorr with the spectnur, aJ
interesied parties concumes the allentivrr ajCounci! and staff
allke irr an effort to prravide security jor the ecanomic
development and notural rrsourres vltal ro lfae regian
Stakrhvlder ottitudes are heginning to shifi toward sulufinn
oriented oplions, rulher lhan ruslomcrry posllroning on
bksiness and e,rviromnental ix.rurs us rhe xearch jor holisiic
- answers contrnues.
- E.slabltthment af a formal Cit`-wjde rnstomcr senice promm
NNith empha4is an timely response, a usrr-friendly atmosphetc, und
an attitudc of facilitaiiua and accommodation within thr bownd.q oi'
responsibility, integriiy, and 5nancial cqmbility of che City,
c'aerneaitdk, l4-nuau cnr,.,iw-r srr*xv
~
including urgaaizAUonal and job dru:nguun Jucuments wiulc pursuing ..bcst practic:rs" ;n
customcr service.
Please see ti,e customer service section high/r'vIl;ed bc'(>>+
The Budgetjor f'isc,a! }'ear 2000
QaLnced Budght Adoplcd:
_T1lr ?tlp(i hudget is in halance: expc€zus havc bccn limitcd so r~.s nui t~~ excc:,•il kno~vn c~r
reasunably prcdictable rcvenucs. Glad tidings af joy wene heard araund City I-iall in Doc.embc:r
2004 when the start-up interfund loan of $3.69 nnillion roquired to fund the fust ycar of City
opcratioas was stamped PA[D W FULL. Contiauing thai good fortunc, this new budget is
designod to pnx3uce a positivc fund balence at ytsr cfld. tn pursuit of that outcvme, sgacial
attaition was given to (imiting the growth in ntw programs and finsncial commitments whitc
Gcy re.►enue and cxpenditun pattcras stabilize. This approach allows available resourccs to te
put toward'ning services consistent wit}i ('ouncil's nrioritic5 for 2t106 and bevond.
Department Achfrvemcnts: E::ach af tlie City's deparnnents undertook
an aggressive woric prograrn in 2045. The budgd doc.-ument contains
descriptiofls of their accompiishmeats far the year and their goals for
ncxt year. I invite residents to take a few minutes to acquaint
themsclves with the effarts made by mttnicipal employccs vn your
behnlf. [ lcave to the dtparlmcnt h;s the p1casurc of stwring their
accomplishments and sucemses.
No ncw positions are rrqnrsted this Ncar sts w'e strivi• tu ad(lrrss tlir
_ , , clrit►and,, of .i cyl~ that has,4rn« n tn h3.0I0 pCf1pIC.
~ ~k~ ~ 1'.1 . !LkC ! :i, ~1 . . Si .i',_ _1 i'... .t.'• I'. _ !i,. , nt. _IL . .
providcrs cltoosc not to ceticw contracts with thc City end as the municipal org,ani7$tion adap,,,.
its staffing lcvels within the con£nes of available revenue. As vve pnss thraugh the formai i.
stages of incarporation, this City has taken a canservative $pproach to adding new Ciry siaff. 2005 survcy af 33 full servicc and contrnct Washingon citics with populetions gMatcr tl; :
30,040 rcvealcd an average count of 819 full-time cmployees and 47 part-timc cmployees.
rvmparison, Spokane Valley cvntracted for many services and employed just 60 full-tune an,!
part-time emplayees. [Please see the zttached 2005 Woric Forre C'omparison]
. . . _ . _ . . . . . . , . ,
renderiag pnograms and services autharized by thc Lity Councii on the behalf of resideIIts.
('urrent ctestomcr .c•ervlce prvgrum elements, Irainirrg and activities include:
9
Zbe City Manager is autharized w transCer budgeted rimounis w7thin n fund; howcvcr,
any rcvisians thai altex the total axpttxiiturcs of a fund, or that affeci the number of
authorizod employee positiaas, salary ranges or othet conditions of employmCnt must be
upprovod by the City Council.
When the City Council dctermines that it is in the best interest of the Ciry tn incrcasc or
dexm,ase the appropriation fof a particular fund, it may do so by ardinance appmved by
one more thaa the matjority after holding one public hearing.
Siaific~~t _Chan= to thc 2006 BudO
A reviaar of the 2006 prcliminary budget revzals the following significant changcs:
Rcvaaucs
1. Sales tax raccipts havc been increasod S 1,402,004 reIlecting mare accurute
coding by rdailers of sales locations aad growth in retail salcs of 5+"/0.
Prapccty taxes have besn decr+easad S 1,800,000 because Library operations
arc naw paTt of the Spokane County L'brtsry Diqtrid which will lcvy property
taxcs for this scrvicc.
3. Planning and Building fxs havt bm rcduced 5263.000 aaticipnLing a
slawin;g oC new constnuctioa and g more con.scrvativic estimete of revenucs.
Expenditvres
1. Constrvction costs for CcnterPlece at Mirabeau Point, have bcen rcduced by
S2,000,004 bocause this projcct has been complctai.
2. Resarves havc been set asidc far unanticipated operatuig costs at Centcrplace,
extraordimcy snaw plowting and deicing, scrvice levrl stabiliration during an
ccocwmic downtum and futurc civic facilitics. lt is unlikely ihese
reserves will bc used during 20(}6. Hawever, this aonscrvativc appmach h3s
ir,cr+cased ctte budgd by $2,100,000.
3. Library expendittcres of 52,270,000 bave beea rcmoved fram the budget
becausc library operations arc now pnrt of the Spokanc C-ounty Library
District.
4. Cupital grant projects sm eupcxted to be S1 million greater ttian 2045 due to
the availability or state funding.
An ocanomic stvdy to investigate the feasibility ta redevelop Sprague Aveaue
ha.g increa.se:d the hudgci by $250,000.
14
City of Spokane Valley
Sc'ectcci i3u(to-et f'olicies
1 lj .:C l_ II.:L~ ~ V' ~;!hI~11_, I;'T !c~ 1 U~:3i11 ftitl•.i Cl
proposals in linc with City (;ouncil and l ity M:unager priurily ciirection, iuid f)r
implcmenting them once thcy are approveci.
7be Finance Department is nesponsible for coatdinating ttie overal) preparatiOn
arxl administralion of the City's hudgeL This fiuiction is fiil5lled in compliance
with spplicitble Statc of Washington sta3utcs govcrning local govGrnment
bud8etin8 Pracdces.
The Financc Department assi-s-ts dcpartmcnt stat'f in identifying budget prvblems,
formulating salutions and altcmatives, und implemcnting any necessary corrective
actions.
Intetfund cha.rgea will be based on recavery af the dircct wsts associated with
providing thosc serviccs.
Budget adjusttncnts reyuiring City Council upprvval will occur through Ihe
ordirmnce pracess at the fund level priar to 6scaJ year cnd.
Zhe City's budget pnesentation will be directcd at displaying the City's services
plan in a CounciUconstituent-friend]y fonnat_
Thc City will pttrsttc ending fund tsalances for oEx:ruling funcis at a levzl of nn less
than eight percenl of rcvcnuc.
Beginning ia 2010, short term debt sha11 not excee.l 10°r nfreverlue; Nc, Ie>tSg
term debt will be incurred withaut identificaiion of a rcvznue t,-ciPaY tli::
dcbL Lang term debt will be incarrod for capital purposes only.
Tltc C'tty will maintain oquipment replarxment Funs3.s that will rzc;~i~~ annu:jll~
bud.geted oontributions from the oprmtinB expenses of departmcnts owning t1le
capital equipmr,ni in an amount nccessary to replace Ihe equipment at tfie end of
its uscful life. Life cyclc assumpti~
~s
EXPLANATION OF REVENUE SUURCES
GM-RAL FUND REVENUES:
Pwperty Tax Reveuue
Property teotes play an essential ro{e in ttzc finances af the muaicipal budgeL Statc lew litnits the
City to a $3.60 levy pcr $1,000 assessod valuation, doducting from thenc the lcvy af 51.30 by the
5poksne County Fire Districts #l and #8, along with dcducting 50.50 for library IrviM which
lcavcs the City wiih the suthnrity tn levy $1.60 for iis own purposcs. The l evy amount must be
cstablisbod by ordiaanoe by Novcmber 30th prior to the levy yesr.
I,ocal ReWl Sales amd Usc Tax
'Me local resnil sales aad use tax is comprised of tw9o separate .S% options with the Counry
mccivin.g 15% of each .SVo. Aftcr deduccing .ol% as a County adminiszraeivc fee, the City's
cffective ratc is .84%.
l.ocal CriminW Justicc Salas Tax
Loca) Salcs Tax for Ctiminal Justicc funditg is to bc usr,d sotely for criminal justict purposes,
guch as the City's law enforcrmeat coniracL This tax is authorizod at 1/10 of 19'0 of retail salrs
tran.5ected in the Caunty. Of the total anmunt coliectesi, the State distributcs 100/a to the County,
with the nemsindCr beiag disvibuted bY PaPulatian ta the cities and the unincocporated areas af
the Counry. Beginning in 2005. an additional .1% votcr apprvved increase in sales tax will be
devoted w criminal jestice pwpases.
' i Tax Rcvrnues
Gambling tax rrvrnues must be spent primerily on law enforccment purpcyses pertaining to
gambLing. Funds remaining aRcr ceccssary cxpcndituRS for such enforocment piuposes may be
usod for any general govcmment pwpose.
e~ambting taxa ane cu be paid quarterly co the City, no later than the last day af January, 4pri1,
July nnd (ktabcr. Thc City imposes e tax on the follow•ing forms of giunbling at the following
rutes: Bingo (5% gross, iess jxiz,es): Raf'fles (5'S6 gros.4, lcss grizes): Cramcs (20/o sross, lcss
Priz=s); Punch Bosrds (5°h oet); Pul1 Tsbs (5% net); C.ard PlSYinK (14% gross).
l.~sschold Eccise T'aa
Taxes on prolxrty awnai by state or local governments and leased to private patties (City's
share).
Franchisc Coes
Cablr Zv is the only f-anchise fce leviod "ut tttt City st s t$te of 5% ol' gross tevenues. This io,::
oP. pi1V11;' I1111llie; fof F}ll' f11?t1T til t.lFt• Clt,6 CtTt'="I[, ;}IlCVS. al?d ott1Cf pl1FiI1C PTTi1vftli
State-Stuirt:d Revenues
Statc-shnred revenues are rrctived for liqtor sales, aad mator vehicie excise taxcs including
travel tiailer end camper excise tax. 7nese caxes are colloctea by the state of washington ana
shAnd with local governmcnss based on populadon. Stwe-shared rcvenues are distributod on
either a monttily or quarterly basic althaugh ont all qusrterly reveaues arc distribuird in the same
month of the quartcr_
Tbc 2045 population figurc used in the 2406 Preliminruy f3udgct is 85.010 as dec,errnined by the
Off ce at Financial Managemeni for Washinglon Staie. This figune is imporiant when
ddainining distribuiian of State shared tevenucs on a per capita basis.
Liqtgr Boatd PraSts and Liquor F.xcise Tax
CitiGS rtccive a share of both liquar basrd profits and liqiwr excisc tax roceipis. Thc pra6ts sre
distributed on the last day of Msrch. lune. September, end Dc,~cember. The excise portion is
distribuicd on the lasi day of January, April, July, and October. To be eligihle to raxiva these
revcaues, a ciry must devote at leasi two percent of the distribuiian to support an spproved
alcoholism or drug aMction program.
Scrvice Rcvcnuc~s
Fec.s arc charged far servic:es renderod by the City of Spakane Valley. Most ef the fees in the
Gencral Fund am canstnlction uupxtions and petmits related to servioes such as Planning-
zoning and building.
F"uics and Forfejt
Fincs aad }xnalties are collectad as a result of Municipal Court nilings and othcr tniscttlaneous
nile infraciions. All court fines and penalties am shared with the State and the City, on average,
kceps less than 50°1o uf the amotnt c.oUec:teti.
R4crratian Promm Fm
The Parf:s and Recreaiion Depwrtment charges fees for sclected recrctstion prngrams. Thcse fees
offsct somc of the costs n:taicd to providine the program.
lavestment Interest
ThC C'ity ezirns invcstment intrte5t uc1 s:des tiLx, propc:rty tax. :uxi fund im•r.stments.
OTHER FLjND REYEN11Eti:
STREET FUNT) :
Mot r Vchic e Fuel 1.xcise I a\ (bss ta.r i
"T'here are two sepatate distribtttians to ciuc; ot rc%criiws Irom d►is tax. c_ i ties wl c11 a pupulutwi,
af 15,000 and above arc requirod to account fOr the per capita sharc of the unnstricUed gas tax a-,%
a saurce to fnancc strect maintcnancc. Both distributions tue no Iongcr rcyuirai tn be accountcd
Cur in scparate funds but it is the City's policy to continue with this practice. Thc City cxpects tc,
tnceive $21.52 pcc capita in moiur vahicle fuc) cxcise tax in 2006. 'Mese dollsrs must be spent
Cky of 3poicans Valfey
2006 Budget Sumrnary
'
EsWnnbd 8sg Est Endirp
Eod EuW Bsl~nee ~ ExpendWn Funo Balance
001 Gsnard Fund $ 4.764250 i 29,941,685 f 28,835.727 s 4,940206
101 Street FuM 3,100,000 9,253.000 4,020,8?1 2,332,178
102 ArWial Sheet Fund 178,272 580.000 738,Z72 -
103 7rsils 8 Paft Fund 16.000 5,053 23.053 -
105 F10leUMObei Ft01d 49,867 351,000 100.667 -
120 CertIArPtaae OpwaRkq Resetve 300,D00 - 300.000 -
121 Servlce Level StabBc2dion 1.000,000 - 1,000,000 -
122 Winlet V1lemOer Resarve 500.000 - 500,000 -
244 Cobt Servce LTGO OCi - 900.000 900.000 -
301 Capifai Ptojects Ftxid 190.000 1,020,000 1,210,000 -
302 Spec#al Cepital PMOWs 50.713 1.Q20.000 1,070,713 -
3E13 SL'eet CaWml Projeds - 8.335.843 8.336.643 -
304 IWrabeeu PoM Cepital Proyech 783.205 - 783.206 -
305 Stred 9ond Cepi~el Prqeds 9a2.180 - 902.480 -
306 CO Bbdc GraM Fund - - - -
-
307 GapitW Gtards Fund - 8.211.000 8,211,000
308 Berker 8ridge Fasi" FtaW - 558.000 558,000 -
3a9 Perks Capital Projects Fund 550.000 750,000 1.300,000 •
310 C1vit Buidlng Cepital Ptojecs FuM 500.000 900.000 1,100.000 -
402 $torrnwater 1118negempnt 485.413 1.539.900 1,859.139 368.174
5Q1 E.qulpmeM R d R 482,792 210,485 893,257 -
5Q2 Risk Mersagemenl 23.739 136200 159.939 -
$ 13.896,511 $ 57.112,116 i 63,402,O97 $ 7,638.564
Cash Utdtzed hDm FunU Bslance $1258,951 -
i 83AS097 f 83d0LM
~
'La
City of Spokane Valley
2006 Budget
Revenues by Type
General Fund
Property Tax $ 8,281,000
Sa{es Tax 15,400,000
Gambling Tax 810,000
Franchise Fees/Business Registrations 681,750
State Shared Revenues 1,121,000
Senrice Revenues 1,600,000
Flnes and Fafeitures 1,350,000
Recreation Program Fees 345,516
Miscellaneous & Investment interest 133,800
Transfers 268,619
Total Generai Fund 29,991,685
Other Funds
Stneet Funti 3,253,040
Arterial Street Fund 560,000
Traiis & Paths Fund 5,053
HoteVMote! Fund 351,000
Debt Service LTGO 03 600,000
Capital Projects Fund 1,020,000
Spec:ial Capital Projec#s Fund 1,020,000
Street Capitial Projects Fund 8,335,843
Capital Grants Fund 8,211,000
garker Bridge - Federal Grant Fund 558,000
Parks Capital Fund 750,000
Civic Building Capital Fund 600,000
Stormwater Management Fund 1,539,900
Equipment Rental & Replacement 210,465
Risk Management Fund 136,200
Total Other FLmds ~ 7,150,461
I oial All Funds $ 57,142,146
Gh oe Spot+no v+40y
2008 Bu~1pe1
Debp tiVwiwM by TYPw
2004 200b MNaded I006
G~n~rM futd Rwm aw ActuMls Btidwt eudQel
erooeft Tat
Prapsity TQ t 8.900,d37 : 9.E70,000 3 IL056.000
Propertr Tet • pahxluwt 165.316 725.000
8,9s0.QJ7 10.055.318 0.281,000
Saba IsM
Salms 7ax 13.Sb1.613 t2,280,00p 13,6S0,000
S" T= - CrknitW Judka 1,119,W 1.118,000 B2Q.000
Snlas Taa - Pubiic Solet/ 600.000 600.004
t4,8a1,175 t3.D98,000 t5.400,000
~
P'►rrJi 9arrds 6 PUI Tabe 149.7DJ 130,q00 12D.=
6rVo & Rs1111s 30.855 44,000 1Q.D00
Card Cien+n 894.5bB M D00 w000
eK1163 eoo.ooo e10.000
4,"9 5.000 2.500
E neMlee Fees 679.461 BSa.000 6at, 750
AA1/Ef Ctirtorw ,ksNoe - Popula0on 14,461 18.I69 11,100
GIY11NW ,An6Cap Aroi st 39,604 14.060 14.000
Orimind .kstlc+e Arm r2 3e.E05 2D,000 2fl.000
Crkrd,W Juslkoe l1m A 38.801 20,000 20.Of)0
CAtrotd JluiNos Arei M ]0.603 57,000 15.000
pLN • Clow 19.914 12.pOp 12000
Uqnr 8ewd Eaaias TaY 324.151 377,41105 413.065
L1qm Bowd f'ruida 59d.4Q7 6128i4 812.e36
WbiUc S4rM R4mbursarrt 2403
t.104,31t 1,121,709 t,t21000
Son6a.8yna!
6uddrv Pamlb 561.191 1,2Dp,000 907.000
h'ltyrnpiuv Pwmitf 68,103 53.000 53.0w
Gratllnp PwttMti 725 7,000 7,p00
MeciarKd ParrtMd D9.900 50,004 50.000
Darnuoeai Pemdta 2108 1,000 1,000
AAlrc Pwmi'.s i Faes 3SB.912 175,OpQ 205.Of10
Ppm C.tiadc Fees 73,274 191.000 197.000
PlennrqFees 3103a5 tD4~" 100.OQ0
1,795.504 1.883.000 1,a00.tnQ
Fines 3 Fvrfelts - Tra6c 53+1.540 60o.OW 673.000
ORier CmriM Non-Trallic Faxs 727.415 600,0p0 875.000
1,261.p5'S t.7w,D00 t,350.000
At" FMw {TQ uit t nCrenOvW tadlMO 2D.TV 3II.DQO 224,900
Piopraen Fsas [fo pmrlbp" 1n a proqram) 723~307 60.400 120.616
152,034 90.D00 345,316
Immsomrdlawm
IrtresEmerR hnsa! 46.712 12000 101.300
Salrs Tss kilrwd 18,022 1200D 15.000
Ptoyerty Ts+c M,4e~at a.6115 t20U0 15,Q00
89.349 36,000 131,300
T
Traruix frmn Sbso Fund 54.300 15267e 111.568
Trandim Iram StorffwalW • 54.482 M,A53
Translet f►am COdd Pqecb - 40.400 -
TrnrrOer Aom F1o4eMofe1 • CerileA'!ow A0,000 40,000
34.300 287.140 258.614
Totd Conwnl Fpnd Rwonw i 29,643,521 :30,106,165 t 29,DB1,6d5
cetr a spok.rw vaa.p
2005 gl+dwt
Dotsil Rnwnues by Type
2004 2006Artrnded 2m
Oltw Fund Rfvrnwe ActLM 6ud0w__
]D1 Street Fub
PrapeiSy Tszes 203243 - AAOlOf Fuel (Wi) Tg 1.144.237 I.?03.OQ4 1,2(T3.000
-
OyernilrV Trortfar • Loan ReQayrnsrN - 1.259.105
InvaslttuYri kiAetaaf - - 60.000
weerMiO Trarxm - 2.025.000 2.000.000
kiMrAind LowInleied 68.8W 75.000
1.404.1J4 4,5621QD 3.253.000
142 Ntnrw 3tteetEixld
Molor Fuel (Ges) Tax 538A78 58Z485 560.000
trnestrnerlkftfeo T~'3b 4.000 10,000
50,213 'Sa6,466 360.000
143 TtsAs 3 R" Fund
T. im s1er (rom SNed FuM 6,492 5.100 5,00
105 tkftyUAo1a1 Fud
HoUdAAolol7ax 383.144 350.000 350,000
Irnrestrnetp Inlsmet 1,607 1.000 1.OOD
385.051 351,000 351.000
hutarttud Trsnsfst - 300.Q00 -
Inlerlund Trsrrier - 1.000,000 -
122 MME VYeaMw Ra~vs
lnlerAnd Trsru(st - 500 000 -
204 Ltbl 5e:vloe - LTG4 43
FscAllles DiaUlct Re++erxx 395.643 397.745 414,000
Dept Servlca Trander *vm Captn1 Projmds - • -
Ttsntbt Irom Specfal Capdal PMOOO
ond SpeCaai CapiW projecb 1R5285 tA5sQ90 180.UUD
5e0,925 5S2.835 wOS1w
307 Q8M i'rol= furxf
REET 1- 1 i125 Peraenl 1.037,020 500.000 1.dD0.U00
Inves6Trer11 hllarsd 11.658 6.000 20.000
1,052.578 8+09.000 1.020.UOo
302 Sasclal Ceoltat Prvloe'k Fuod
REET 2- 2nd .23 Peroenl 972120 800.000 1.OOO.D00
tnvestmer,a 1rneres~ 11.583 9.000 ?O.ooR
993.713 806 0(l0 1,420 2ni.
3Q3 Sirvel C~mi si F't_~g~
ltNa6bTron1 Inle+est gr ,
Developer CanlftAl" 8,0= . Grdnt Prooeaft - • e.~ - - -
Tranabt hom Streel Bond Fund 1.U19,~89 - 90: ;
Transior hrr► Genersl Fund - 342.3D0
Tnnsfer trom Sew[r Fund 237.344 -
TnmsW hom Artertet StreM Furd - 670.I00 28- ~•:Trarnfor 6rom Slortr*mW ldanekprnert Fund - 150.000 150.Cw
Trj►,srw aom speoa► c,pRW Prnpda 200tooo z.soo 977,71,
1,517,657 4,252.3CK) 5,335.50
:w
Cny d Spokww Vadvy
2006 Budgt
Dsftl Rov*nuss bf► 7YPe
2004 Z005 AnwtrMd 2005
Olhw fun0 RMntas ACUW 8~ BadRf
InrESbtimM kAeteot 75,8" - -
Donmlloru 2.580.670 • -
knuasrme Racoretfes 1.006
2.967,,566 - -
305 SUeW Botx1
IrvesbTwd krDerssi J7.T28 . .
305 CD elock Grsn1 FunC
G0OG GtiIA PrOCeed~ 267,9M . .
IrrAw&nwYlrMeislA 134,941 - -
4Q2.7s4 • -
307 Cacitt! Gntfa Fud
CapltM Cxarq pTpc+eeft t{t.OW 4.410.000 Q,857,815
7rmlets trom Mar1M Stteel FuM - 186.000 236.303
Tr'nsius Gom Cipilal PnoJecis Fund 97.050 408.000 t.! 17.000
118.061 6.010.00D 8.211.000
30e 8aitter &IdM R~r~frrxOn - FsG i'mt
Federal Csrad Prooeeft - 350.0Q0 536.000
Mileriix~d Trfnafen - 550.000 T50.000
310 Cdvfc &OMna Caollr,BMJM
IfyEirMtd TrirMb+f - 500,000 900.000
401 SewatFund
InveotntwY InbOtasl 334 -
402 stnm+wM MaruoaMM F«r,a
SlonnwUer AAerapen+enl Fee 716.Mg 1.270.750 1,624,9U0
Investrnen1 Urterest 12.301 6.000 15,000
Te9m4 12ra.7so IX39.eoo
501 Eautgxnon4 Renua a aa*gff=► Funa
IttvvsdnwtM Inlerest 0.17 - t .50U
WorlaMtlpn Chatpes sk200 81.750 122,061
Pool Car Charyes 5.58Q 3.d00 3.800
Yshide Pumbese Ttww*s 15.000 33.551 33.551
V,NMCM RepU,pemay Curpas 19,374 281N 44.550
1?9.071 145,305 210.465
Ffg~
F41 Rlalt MoongKmW
EtslpbyRlerg 9eduft Trarufeis 4.9M 1,450 6.200
RM mntwgement Sem= 130ADO 130.000 130.000
131,E44 134.150 135,2w
T40W AM OQ*r Fundt 11.0W347 21,708,314 27.1 W.181
TotN Rwwnws 40,731,875 S 51,814,479 i 67,142.148
7G
City of Spokane Valley
2006 Budgst
Expendihures by Oapartment
General Fun--
legislaUvQ Brancti S 304.26;
legisls0ve 6 ExfltxAive Setvkea 470,105
PubHc Safety 16,873.541
Operations b Adminisiroive
Depuly City Maneger 499,405
Frtance 516,695
Legai 283,750
Human Resounoes 181,120
Pubiic Work,s 972,842
F'lanning & C.amrtemfty Dev.
P18rving 1.095,808
8ullding 1,037.228
Parka b Recreaion
AtkiNrgstration a Malntenwioa 847,703
Recreabm 199.475
Aquatics 299.921
Senior Cerftt 69,289
CenletPtacb 438.298
Generat C3ovemmant 5.768,000
Total Genera} Fund 28.835,727
Odw Furds
Street Fwxi 4,020,822
Arteriai SG'eet Fund 738.272
7raoa snd Paths Fund 23,053
HoteUMdel Fund 400,667
CenterPlace Opetating Reszrve Ftma 300,000
5erv4cs Leval 3lablization Fund 1,000,000
Windw Weether Reserve Fund 500,OOQ
Debt Senrice - 17GO 03 800,000
Capital Projecxs Fund 1,210,000
Spedal Capital Pro}ects Fund 1,070,713
Street Cepitial Projeds Furd 8,335,843
Mirabeau Pplnt Capital Pto}eCts Fund 783,205
Streei Bor►d Capital Projeda Fund 902,460
CapitW Grants Fund 8,211,Oai
Berker Bridge - Federel Grant Fund 558,00(1
Parks Cepdat Pro)ecta Fund 1.300,00`
C'rvic Buiidings Capits) Projeds Fund 1,100,QG"
Storrnwater Managemerrt Ftmd 1,H59,13':
Equipment Rental 8 RsplecerneM 693.257
Rlak AAanagertwd Fund 159,93:
Total Ali Funds S 63,402,09
Clty ot Spokane Valley
2006 Budyet
General Fund Expenditures by Oepartment by Type
wem a
@erwft Suggliet so! tnbmuav. 1ntw1und CaoitsJ E~cn Tgw
Gen,~ral Fund
Legislatlve 6randh $ 149,962 $ 19,300 f 122,068 i - = 12.947 t - $ 304.267
Lepistatlve & Exacutlve 403.020 7.748 50,090 - 9.247 • 470,105
PubNc Safety - - - 18,873,541 - - 16.873.541
OPerations 8 Adrtdniaitatirre
Deputy Glty Manegm 414.408 5.700 87,700 - 11,897 - 489.405
Finnnce 455,795 12.700 23,100 - 15,300 - 518.885
L,epal 212,750 5.500 38,800 - 5,900 - 283,750
Human ResourCes 100,620 3,500 53,300 - 3,700 - 181,120
Publlc Works 808.845 12.887 59,415 10,000 29.494 22,600 972,942
Planninp d► CorranuNty Dev.
Ptamning 589,278 16.200 06.034 - 14.798 7,600 1,095.806
Buikhng 648.829 38.575 70,836 31.240 37,200 10.849 1.037.228
Parics & Recresiion
Paim Administration 182,238 48.340 634,127 - 3.000 - 847,703
RecreaUon 138.575 4,078 48.882 • 7.940 - 198,475
AqueUq - - 299,821 • - - 298.'11
Senlor Center 49.990 4,81M 12.570 - 1.8D0 - 69.269
CenterPtece 186253 12.830 238,205 • - - 438,29i!
Genural Govemment - 6.000 2.615,000 165,000 2,886,000 125,000 5.78t).OW
Total Goneral Fund S4,530,871 S 229,858 S4'801,817 S 17t089,701 S 3,038,021 s 185,849 $ 29,835,727
12
City of Spokane Valley
2006 General Fund Expenditures by Dept
$30,249,927
LegEslattve Brsnch
1.0% Legisialive b Etecutive
~ - Servicea
1.8%
Generel Gov$mment
20 496 ~
. .
Perks b Recreetion
6.2q6 -
Planning 8 Commurnty
Oeveiopment _
7 1% - Public Sefety
55.896
Public Works
3.29'0
Operatbns & Adminlstrative
Serv)ces
4.8%
Fund: 001 C3wwrsl Fund spok.M vedlhr
tkpt 013 Exscutive 8 Lpblafve Support 2006 Budget
013 - Exacudv a Loaistatw. smp,►n
Ciw1s► for 2006
• DraR a vwil-deftr►ed Stroet Msstst Pian, with Funding Options, that identifties
Me curreM condition of aty sireels and rexortvnends aAVroPria1e imPmvementa end
mainlenance thet preservc the vakue and structural integrity d the locaf transportation
sysism_
. lnitiabs the Ftrst Phasa of the SaraotN Cortidor Rwltaltsatlon Phm
between University anC the teaway by contrading with a consultaM to desipn a
strateyy M would str+angttm the ewnomic viabiltty of the oorridor
• Contln Monitodnn $kmlticant Wnio±wataf hsM induding gaverrance of
wastrxatar facilities, enhanced cttizen awareness of options fow the future anG
pursuit of the most effident and economical use of allowed wastewabr discharge&
•MaiMWn a Strono Emahasis on intonst and Extemil Communkation
util¢infl Ihe PuWJc Iniormation Officer positkon to cnhance the quality, lfmeUness and
aocuracy of internal diabpue and the tnfortnaljon provided by cit¢eies aboul ci4y
issues, fndiaUves and woAc ptans.
• Exaioro the AvalLaWe Talecommun{catlotts InfiastruCtttt+s BrtQ tnat may be
accessed by public insMutions, rr.sitknts and businesses wfthin Spokane Vaiky.
6udQet Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget B et
Petsormel - FTE Eau`nrslent~
Clty MenaW 1.0 1.0 1.0
City Clerk 1,0 1.0 1.0
Depu.y City Clerfc 0.5 0.5 0.5
Administrative Assistant (CC) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Assbsant (CM) 11Q 114 1D
ToEal FTE.a 4.5 4.5 4.5
Qudoet Dtt3il
Salaties, Wages, 8 Bene(its $319,271 $391,969 $ 403,020
Suppiies 6.439 6,998 7,748
Services & Cherges 32,032 38,650 50,090
Interfund Charges 5,880 5,250 9,247
Total Executive 8 Legislative Support $~363,622 i 41 D5
38
Fund: 001 General Fund Cky of Spokane Va1ley
ospr 016 Pubifc Satety 2008 Budget
016 - Publlc Safetv
The Public Safety c3ePartment budAet Provides huxis for the
protedion of persons and property in the city. The City contrads
witfi Spokane CouMy for law ertforcemesit, disbid court,
prosecutor services, public defiender services, probation I
services, jall and animel control services. See folloving Page tor
cietail intormation on each budgeted section.
Law Ertforcement - The Spokane Courtty Sheriffs offioe is
responslble for mairrtaininp laar and arder and providing poilce
setvices to the community under the direction of the Potioe Chiet.
The office provides fof the prsservatjon of ftfe, protedion of
property, and reduction of cxime. I
8udgeted contract amount: $ 13,460,009
Judiclai System - The Spokane Gounty Dlstrid Court is contraded
to provide munidpal court servioes. The contract provides for i
the servioes of judge and court aommissioner with retated support
staff. Budgeted amourrt alao includes jury maRagernent fees.
6udgeted contrad amouni: $ 1,683,425
Jail System - Spokane CouMy prvvides jail and probation
servioes tor persons sentenced by any City of Spokane Valley
Municipaf Court Judge for viatating lavvs of the city or state.
Budgeted carrtrad amount i 564,000
Animal Control - Spokare Courtty will provide anlmal control
servioes to indude ticensing, care and treatmerri of lost
or stray animals, and response to potentially dangerous animal
confrocitatiotts.
Budgeted contrad amouM: $ 433,484
39
City of Spokane Vailey
2006 Budget
016 - Publtc Safety
20D5
2004 Amended 2006
Actuai 8udget Budget
Judktsl System:
DisW CauR Contraid 855.756 691,3n 839.817
Jury 6Aanegamerlt CoMract 7.958 5.000 5,000
Pu6ilc Uefender Cantract 215,519 310,026 342,705
Prosea*nr Conh-act 221.698 294.159 357.520
Crime Victim CompemMort - 8,485 -
Prebial5en►loes Confraa 25.188 32,908 48.383
F'rotration Servioes Conhed 30,482 80,000 -
8ubtardl Judichd Syifmm 1,156.599 1,401.908 1,50.425
Lsw Etr(oncwnent SYsbm:
Shei1f Contrad 11,719,6B8 12.89i2.300 • 13.319.812
Emegenc,y Mansgement ContrW 56,093 84.700 72.397
l..aw Enf. Bldg Mairftnanae CantraQ 58.682 38,573 40,000
Vehic{e pec8ls 5,197 10.00D 10.000
Clothinp & UMorrrsa - 7.000 7,000
Vefwe Usaqe Costs 222 500 5,300
EqWpment Rcplecemerri Ctwge 5.5w 5,500 5,500
Suptobl la+w Entorewnwd 8yslem: 11,873.382 13,018.578 13.460,009
JaY Systsm:
„Iai1 ConSrad 383.921 171,039 444.000
Worlt Roieas8 (Geiger) 30,393 118.759 120,000
Subtotod .laR Sysdm: 391.314 289.798 584,000
Other:
CapKalOultaYs/Canmunicatlonti - 196,000 132,623
Ftnes & Focieihxes State Remlttarxx 859.8e5 591,515 590.000
qnknaJ Control C,,ontrae! 399,555 409.627 433,484
Contingency Reserve - - 100.000
1,059,360 1,199,142 1255.107
zow Public sa" s 14,483,635 s 15.e09.424 s1s,ar3.5+1
• The increase d Uw Sherilf Cotrirxt is the Citys ponion nelated !o lhe aeldement d tha CouMy SheriRa labor
neQatiatians. tn addiiion. a vodar appvved sales laz 4nusase oi .19L In ZO(}d of sales taz !s designated to tund
cxUninal juttiae and public safety telated oasts.
40
City of Spokene Vallay
2006 Budgebed Contract Expenditures
14,000.000 13,319,812 -
~
~
~ - . _
. - - ~
12,000,000 ~ - - - _ - ,
I
~
' _
10.000,000 - • - - _
- _ I
8,000.000 ~ _ . . _ . - - - - - - - _ - - ;
' I
~
~
6,000.000 - - - - - - - - - ~ - - . -
I
I ~
~
, - _ . . _ - ~ .
4.000.000
~
i
. - - - - - - . - - ~
2,000,000
639;817
~ 342,705 357,520: ~ 72,387, 444,040, : 120,000
• ~ _ .
- -
D►str►ct Cour1 Public Oetender 1'rosecutor Sheriff Gontract Eraeryency Ja►I Contract Wortc Release
Contrad Contract Contsad Ntensgement (Gei9er)
Conb'act
Fund: 001 Gawrsl Ftmd fpoanv vafty
a.pe o„ oo.ratioem a AdRdnistr.nw swvkm Yoa eudg.e
Qll - OnKnt)om L AdmMrdstrOm Safvion
The Opeafiorw & AdmkiavatJre Sarvk.es f?eqoinrmM b aompaed d lour
mvftions, tna DePuty C7h' AAwyger DiAsfon. lF+e Flnanoe Divisim ft LepM
[Avkbn. ind Qie Fltirum Rdeoiutes U&-om
013 - Deoio Glh IMMM Divi~la►
The OopuN Ciy AAwu+gw (OCK w*erv+w tir Opers4ons A Atmarvtb76+re
SsMcrs UeparVnerk, assrts Ifre C4y AArtiaper kn orpwtthp ord dieclk~y t!r
oew oparafions af the c31Y wnd asiwmes Uie dulioe o1 the CkY Meneoer
n hiNAer ebsenoe
Accomoilalnernb fot 2005
• EstabisAed a loxmtial, d1Vw4e Cuslanet satvo prDqtun
. Davebped model prsetneft for uee in sarvir,e oontr~cn wllh Spokane CourkY
in ottter b Orovida oonoftft►wY and enlm Ke omovumbft.
• Ravised ifv Iew ardarownwd apreemuN in ardx ro sMqpWN Ina ooq rtwmodobqy
and k+amase responsivex+ess fMwph ardyncad lkadblkv
• Comcld d o coot-beriefd anefvsis n roqird lo fRxsrv srrexallw esid vresenled an
mnnexailon mensuro b ttrt dhrans Mst Oraosed arvwmWon to !he SpokAm CounM
LbuY Da!►id
• OewYaprd srd implema10d C.atwnardol8ukfinp Permk prooedum ID erbtre
timety manaorinp. tespona2 and Meros,rdlon In ft pennll procm.
• Cntow u+e Ynplotmwil9d Ir~erd~m~ff~tl traW'~0 ~brtf~ b mawlor !he
siocalbn d timo and ►esovm.
. RavNwed ind ievked ITr CM d 5twlartie vaMrr olficlW wr)slle.
. cnuslea and Onp1emmMea ciry a spo+car,e vailey conttnxraUws pokfe, W,a
Procaduras, MK*x%q uisls aoRUrcinicalion proprwn
Sg!4.lff ~
. Revie++v and revise clty't prooesm w ersur reliebibrq. oorsisla,~ ena
afkancY
• SbrxkartUe a1 d!Y pubiralioas and Pot+ted Itstl~irb ID oonkxm {O hipheat
Irtandards at prohesslonaism Nnd d}eclivervms.
• hioeme+t ir" demrnfs M ooefwtwrtkr corrurtw*=Wm proprsm. lndudkq
emabfnfrnp o 5peakars 6ureou & ect+eeufinp rewuta► enqaqaments on alticsl copia-
Budoet Sumetitrr
2005
2004 Amotxled 2006
Aciwd BudgM Budgt
FTE
Oopuhr Ctr Iu1anMger 10 1 0 LO
Admin6strattve Analyst 1.0 1.0 10
PuoBt Inhxmafion OIkw 00 O,D 1,0
OfRoe Aawtarb N 1,0 1.0 1.0
Administa" Assistanl Q,A Q,g Z,Q
to4d FTEs 3.5 3,6 6.0
Wiges, 6 Berwfits f 221.M $331.042 6 414,408
Seipoks 4,100 8200 5.700
5ervkes 8 Charpes 3.554 7,700 67,700
k*Aund Chnrges 5,680 5,750 11.597
Tvtal DepM Ch bM+aper Dvoon 3
Fund: 001 General Fund Spoksrn vauay
oept: 016 Operaibns b Admintstrative Servlcea Zd06 eudget
014 • Financa OfirislQn
The Finance Division provides finandal menagemertt services for all dty
departments. Programs indude accountinp and reporting, payroll. accouiris payable,
punchasing, budgeting and frnanaal planning, b$asury, iMormation technobgy
and investments. The department Is also responsibie for generating and analyzing
data rela3ed to tfie Cttys operatiorts. The deparVnent prepares monthly, querterty.
and annual fmancial reports and budgets to ensuf+a compl'ranae with state law6.
SccgMpJishmeMs tor 2006
• Expanded mufti-year financiai plan to a sbc year window to commpond wRh ather
Ciry plans.
• Devebped an A-87 Cost Albcation.
Qaals for 2006
• Corninue to refine the multi-year financial pian process by comparing revenue
estimat,es with other area sQencies.
. Ideritify avaitabie telewmmunications inirastrucfure that Is/could be avallable in tlhe
area for use by clttzens and twBinesses. Oisc:uss same with economic developmeM
agenc~es tn determlne benefits.
. Integrate informa4on from A-87 cost eliocation pian Into the City budget..
Budaet $tMmant
2006
2004 Amended 2006
Acbual Budget Budpet
Personnei - FTE Eauivafents
Finance 8 Atlmin Sen+ices Director 1.0 1.0 1.0
Accounfing Maneger 1.0 1.0 1.0
Accauntant/Budget Analyst 1.0 2.0 20
Accourrtinp Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0
IT Speciaiisl ],Q 1_,0 1 Q
Total FTEs 5.0 6.0 $.0
Sudoet Detail
Salaries, Wages, 8 8enefrts $337.105 $481,8&9 f 485,785
Supplies 5,128 7,700 12,700
Setvices 8 Charges 12,271 12,400 23,100
Interfund Charges 9,240 9,250 15,300
Total Firiance Division $~363,7464 511 219 $ 516,895
4 3
Fund: 001 Generat Fund 8pokane vailhr
Opt 032 Public Works 2006 Budqet
032 • Public Wwft
The Publ"ic Works Oepartrnent providea ovwall ptaRning and oversigM of public
works projeds in the City of Spoicane Valiey. The departmerrt provides
engineering plan review, inspecdon, caordination of major pubGc works capital
improvemeni projects, bnQ-range trensportation planning and neighborhood traffic
management The Public Works Street Mamt+emnce Section iS responsible for
maintenance of streets.
Accon,psnrnents for zooa
. Condnued analysis and review with the County. City of Spokane, and Department of
Ecology ragarding Wastewater Treatment Facility options.
• Wartced witfi the Rsgional Wastewatef Commitiee to evaluate the possibilities of a
Spokane Regionel Wastewatar Allisnce.
. Began development of a PubNc Worics strategic ptan that will provide a blueprirrt for
tt►e developmeM oi the department
. Maneged and refned corttrad with Spokane County and others for public worlcs
servic7es and cotmtrvction.
• Provided engineering review and support iw City funded projecls and other Ciht
pubtjc works reeds_
• Developed the Six-Year Transportation Plan (TIP) for Council adoption.
• Provided public worlcs expertise in the ComprehensWe Planning effort.
• Provided Devefopment Review on new Commercial Development Projects, Single
Famity Lots, and Mutti-Family Units.
• Implemented and closely supervised the major Streea Gapital Projacts_
Goals fcw 2006
• Analyze and review with the County, City of Spokane, and Depadmem of Ecofogy
regarding Wasteweter Treatrnent Facitity options.
. Wortc with the Regional Wastewaber Committee tv evalusbe the possibilities of a
Spokane Regional Wasfewaitef Allfanc:e.
• Manage and refrne contrad with Spokane County and ottw for public works
services and construdion.
46
Fund: 001 General Fund Spokans vafty
Dept psi Pub(k Works 2006 Budpet
032 - Public Worlcs
Gosls br 2fl06. Continued
• Provide enginearing review and suppart for City funded projects and othw City
public worlcs needs.
• Develop the Six-Year Transportation Ptan (TIP) fw Council adopfiOn.
• Implemet►t and dosety supervise tt►e major Street Capital Projec:ts.
• Provide Development Review on new Gommercial Deve#opmer►t Projects, Singie
Family Lots, and Mutti-Famity lfiits.
• Update SVeet Design Standards.
Budoet Summam
2005
2004 Amsnded 2006
i Budget Budget
Actm
Personnel - FTE EauNalents
Public Works Director 1.0 1.0 1.0
Adminfstrative Assistent 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Engineer (Development) 1.0 1_0 1.0
Senior Engineer 0.0 0.4 0.0
Assistant Engineer (Develapmerrt) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Enginew (CIP) 1.0 1.0 1,0
Enginear (CIP) 0.0 1.0 1.0
Engineer (Development) 0.0 1.0 1.0
Assistant Engineer (CIP) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Engineering Technician 1_0 1.0 1_0
Tote! FTEs 7.0 9.4 9.0
8udae! Dotai1
Salaries, Wages, 8 Benetfts $ 526,093 $718,392 $ 808,846
SuppRiss 16,048 29,878 42,687
Services 8 Charges 26,769 35,120 59,415
Irttergovemmental Payments - - 10,000
Capital Outlay 31,868 - 22,500
Inteiiund Charges 14,994 17,100 29,494
Total Public Works $615,769 800 490 $ 972,942
Fund: OOt Gonorat Fund spokan. valhy
Dopt: 0N Plannln9 3 Communltp OwebpmeM 2108 Budget
069 - suitdino oivisMon
The Bui{ding Qivision impiemanta lhe WaaNngton Stale Bulidfng Code. It ts
reapatsibb for ensuring ttiat btllcgngs and sVudures compty with edoptad buildmg
cotta stendards tftrough prafessionel pten revfew and IrisOecbon services. The Petmit
Canter reoeives aWcations and coordinaies the revlew and proceasing of pertnft
ACGOfifDRoh/i16Aft /Ow 2005
•Wdegrate Budding and Code Compfiencer proviabn wtth the Unilorm DCveiopmerK
Code.
• Implemented Regional PevemeM Cut Policy.
• Ccmpieted trtqAemeMatlon ot the PLUS pertni!!ir►g system.
• formelized buildhg pian reWew prooeases.
• Redured backlog a1 Code oompleints by 50%.
(ioals Ior 200B
• COnttnue staif trafting and prvlessbnal developmenL
• Comptete Pavemerd wt trauwnp sysiems•
. Implemenl fu0 enfotr,ement d adoptad sign rogulslions.
• ComPlete Rfa" Hazard Witigetlon P1an.
• Expedta commardal permtl issuance.
suftot Summarv
2005
2004 Ameodsd 2006
Actusl Budpet Budget
Panwnnei - FTE Eauivakrris
ButEding Oficial 1,0 1.0 1.0
Bulldinp htspedor II 2,0 3.0 3.0
Cade Enbtcemertt Of~iCa 2,0 2.0 20
GaratrucNan Irispedcr 0,0 2.0 20
Senior Pertnit Speciafiol 0.0 1.0 1.0
Pennil Spedallst 20 3.0 3.0
Senirx Pians Exatrkner 0.0 1.0 1,0
Platxs Exem[nar ?..,4 u u
Totel FTEa 8.0 110 13.0
%92d DAM
Selaries. Wages, b 8enefits $540.083 $654.566 $ 848.979
Supplles 48,054 33,375 38,575
Setvices & Charges 62,512 49,015 70,635
Irtergovemmerttel Payrnenis - 31,240 31,240
CapilalOuNay 12,278 6,449 10,649
interfund Charges 31,440 26,684 372D0
Tatsi Bu1lQing Division S 894,385 891 309 ; 1,037,Z28
~
Futd: OOt Gensrsl Funa spokatro vatwyl
pMpt on Parb b Rscrostlon 2WG B~~
076 - Partw 6 Resro"on ,
The Parks and ReueaIion QepeRmeM is camposed d tive ' s, the ~
Adrnhistration and Part Meinter►ence Dhrlsbn, RerleeUon, AVustks, Senia' Center,
and the CantsrRlaoe Divlslon. TM overed goal ai tM depaAmwt is lo provlde qwlily
tscrea~ion proptsms and aoquWbon, renovalion, deuebQmeiy. cpetstion. and
melntersante Ot p8rtcs and receatbn twJkftt ~
4Q4 - Paft tnbtrOW i AArlrrbwp ~
The /ldminfetrafbn Divtslon prtivides dirediam orM IesdersNp tor ft PsrRs eW
Ftec:aet;on Department in impiemennrq tne goas ana oejectlves or ft chy cound
and tedfltoWe the pmersl upkeep vf Pmks and twblic anen of the CNy.
. Assisted h projeU meneqeunenl d CanlerPiade oonstrucHon.
• Compbted the Patks etld Rxreafkm Mesfef Plan.
• Compietea the Pool fa*Wbiky stixN.
• DedicatirxdGrand Openinq o1 the CeMerPlaoe farAM1►.
. Ilwerded and mwseged Park msktenance Contr'd wtlh 5enske Tree and Lawn Cere.
• Awarded wid msnsped equatk tadltY opwatlo^ and maiMenence cocgrsd wlth
tha YMCA.
. Awarded the jwN1orisl conttacl for CanierP'faa.
• Comploletf trainhg and impiementation oi rew CenterPleCe and Rocreelion
program reglstrafion soAware.
c;oals for 2006
• MaximIze Me tae W CenterPlece_
• Evakiase and menage the squatiCS oQaraHon and maintenenos aorMrad
• Putwe &npiemcntation of okpdW Projects IdeM!!bd In AAsaW Ptan.
• Puraue panl oppWtunRles to comple4e perk improvemern proJeas•
sudM &wnnarY
~
2005 ~
2004 Mtanded 2006
Actusl 9udqst 9ud9et
Personnel - M EaikalM
Partcs a Reaeatbn Okeatw 1.0 1.0 1.0
AdrniNstratire AsslsterN 1 4 i-D ].4
7otd FTEs 2.0 2.0 20
Seiaiies. y1leges, b ggfleft : 144.128 S 162,718 $ 162.236
Suppoes 36,841 9,580 48.340
Services b Charyes 742.9+43 894,884 634.127
Capital pWey 32.211 - -
IMetfund Chnm 5,010 3.000 3.000
Tofal Parks AdminisUailon $960is61 i 1,070,282 S B47.703
at
Fund: 001 General Fund spokans valley
Dept: 07e Parics & RecreatiQn 2006 eudget
301 - Recreatlon Division
The Recreation Division coorclinates and faclt)taies the deliv+ery af rerxeatbn programs
and servroes throughout the city and the Cftys park system.
Accamotishments for 2006
• Offered 10 weeka of "Summer Day Camp" instead of the 9 weeks in 2044.
• Expanded Mariceting of Summer Programs: Newspaper, Schoots, S.C.O.P.E
• IntervWwed and hined summer staff.
• Continued Fotming Recreation Prvgram Policy_
• ConVRwted to the Grand Opening of CenterPlace.
• Conducted "Walk Acroas Washington" event
Coals for 2006
. Incorporate Masfier Plan Results into Recreation Programming and Policy.
. To expand the Recreation Programs to coindde with the Master Plan.
• Implemented goalS and policies implemented by Master Pian.
• Continue to offer "VNalk Acxoss Washington" Evertt.
• ConUnue Serving As A Clearinghouse For Gitizen Recreation Program Needs;
Nelworlc With And refer Customers To Other Providers.
Budoet Summarv
2006
2004 Amended 2008
Actual Budget 8udpet
PetsQnnel - FTE Eauivalents
Recreation Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0
Budaet Detai)
Sataries, Wages, & Benefibs g 45,153 $ 116,790 $ 138,575
Supplies 1,655 8,555 4,078
Services 8 Charges 22,405 24,930 48,862
Interfund Charges 8,120 7,940 7,940
Total Recreation Division $ 77,333 $ 158,215 $ 199,475
52
Fund: 001 General Fund Spoksne Vatiry
o.pc: 076 Parka b Recreation 2006 Budget
302 - Aauatlcs Division
The City oi Spokane VaUey awns three poois: Park Road Pool. TeRace View Pool, and
Valley Mfssion Pool. Services indude Open Swim, Stivim Lessons, Swim Team and
faciiity reMals. In addition, the CRy leases a portfon of Va11ey Mission Park to Splashdown
Inc. for a water paric.
The City cumently is contracdng wrth the Y.M.CA for all aquatic ectivities within the
City. The County provides the I'ifeguards and maintains the pools during the season.
Accomolishments tor 2005
• The pool season was extended by opening eariier.
• Worked on review and approval oi Splashdown request for expansbn.
• Cre.ated RFP and awarded corttract tor the Operation and Maintenance of City Pools.
. New D'nring boards were installed at all City poots.
Goals for 2006
• Review and evaiuate aquatic contract.
• Evaluate ptan to improve existing pools as per the Poo! Feasibiiity Study.
Budoet Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actua! Budget Budget
Budaet Det$il
Services S Charges $238,492 $255,818 $299,921
Capital Outlay 11,055 - -
Total Aquatic.s Division $ 249,547 $ 255,818 $2991921
FrDt pl GoneeW Fund fpo4~ vaM
vapt Oo W1wHi 00n"111Yf1 7m BuOod
PM GMod QoImfY" C*pwV11o mfl;flM~ sClFVlln 11m Ifl00f1~M ~0[YIOr
b rtwAOb dv0wtmwi tdedWn CNs de;rlrt-rA os thn awb ul ch N* "
no'alsd uffllm rtwwqmeeM hkrtrMlion wrvlom, irmunnos oC" nisoolww"A
dRq ~pOmtxnerW ar.wls and capRal sq&mpmrd ooa4s trrR bw%M eion tlm
arw dopwtn+ent
oulim
1005
20m AawWrd 200t
Atf" BadpM duditt
Maw.RlW Oo+b
ftmn[ir,p a &I* S~rNOes t ra,7rl s 2oe.~oo i t~o.ooo
softo.m Mmftn.c. ae,ns 3e,aoa Q.ooo
Ehoeon c.oa. Im,soo 60,00o eo.ooa
aMrV,ensOWr.u" m,an 15,ooo +s,ooo
Atf"rtiMp /6,OQ3 31550 10.000
Empbyee itappqnlbn - 3.000 3,000
yob pope 8,015 5,D00 5,000
Tmbyqrrfp$l Chlrps i<,MO 24.000 20.000
(T CQnwIUc+O Ql.470 70.000 90.000
P-111ft sakW. 27.8s - -
sW,Jwr Adv.orr c,ou„di iae 50o sao
oa«aAno suooks • s.aoo s,ooo
:'Mno1 ToaY serd Mkior EOuiPmwd - - 2.OOD
Spotsna Caxrt1 Ganl:sG • OIS - - 20,000
C,a,pisr MWitlrvnco . . 6.500
Lasooftmems 1,367 30.000 20,OW
M+II1rtaw
lnOerAnd Lctin M+IeeMl 43,136 75,000 -
MAwitnd R+tlc Irluvipwnxnt PaymwR 130,000 130.000 135.0DD
-
Opara" ?rsrmier - l.ow RawSRwI - 1.221.105
Facftke
FaciWly Rspass 6 Iairrtersu+os 1.2Q2 - S.G00
Ainawwoms 8uwo 1wftTmnca - i,000 .
Coeflpulw $odtwmm wnd HerDM" - 166.000 110,000
Ti-dr b St" CapRa1 Fund - e0C,000 .
TransNr b Pwks Capitr Fund - 350,000 750,000
CRy NM tamu+p Coab.
Cky tW Rwt 220.129 251,055 3m000
Lmmonow kwrwjwmm 79,810 53,745 15,0ao
-
sb„ve sp.a. a P.rxrm 3.000 3,000
ouAlde swwc.s
AAo'nbssOrV+ - SRTC 34.3t10 76.000 36.0OG
Saidy E3xaFion 6 Pnvattlfon - - 3,000
Ak&pt Trwtrnenl 17,513 19.000 19,000
$potaro County /4& Pc&Aan /4upiorRY 114."6 110,910 110,000
CAy Eaawrtrc U.tieioprtmnt 9e0 1o,UOO 10,0oo
CaDM imrlliM M*pOllrtlOiY 25 20000 20.000
ypter PJIOdral" . • 65.000
Umpwd fee 31u0y - 50,000 50.000
ftern+eift Fam Ou4ai0b Aowx*mkfxononmc OavoiaOffNn1 73,000 T3,000 eB.000
Re*xsts 4am Otsblda 11perww&Sotiml 8- an 77.000 27.000 31.000
QoanperRy C HnwvN
R.sarw 10► Rer.rn,e AckmMnerft • e 17.s3s askDOo
Trsssiir b Cmi 9uldnq Reoerw Fund - 500,00() 800.000
7nvvAv tn 9rt~oe Level Remevr FunO - 1.000.000 -
Trondrr tc VWnhr Wooerr Raaowe FuM • 5W.000 •
0pxEilinp - S"el Fund - 2.000.000 2.OOQ,000
Corninpenc.y - lf00 000 500 000
f t. W $9.196306 i 5.7a6,000
~
Fund: 101 Str$et fund Spokans v&ney
o.pt 042 Zoos sudget
101 - StrNt Furtd
The Strret Operetlng pragrarn is esiablished to prov+de etflcienl and eafe movernent
of both motorized and non,-molotized vehides as well as pedestrians within 1he limils
of the Ciry and coardir►ate convenient IMeroonnect to the reglonal vansportation
systwn.
The transpodetion neNvorks, under thls program. ore dasigrfed, cansiructed. and
mairttained !o impreve tAe qwiiry af IHe whUe provfdlnp the efidaM mavament oi
Commerce.
AccomplisAments for 2005
• Operaied and mainlsined sN CMy streQts and the lwo state hiphways. SR 290 and SR 27,
wo tt►e Clty lirsits-
• Carttinued to contrec3 with Spokam Cauny for engineering services rstated tc operwJma
and rralntenenoe a1 Ciry streeta
• Began devebpment ot a Meighborhood Trafic CalmiV Manaqernent program.
• Wartced wlth Commxmtty Devebpment to ensure Itsat adequata fraRic and bw►sportsdon
miUgation Is pravided
Goals for 2006
• Operaie and meWftln all City Oaeta and the two etete MVtrrayi, SR 290 and SR 27.
with tha Ciry Gmita
• CoMinue to contrad with Spokane CauMy► fw engineerittig services nalated lo operalions
and mairnsnance oi Cifiy stneels.
• Imprvve signa! tlmtn9 coordirtation Ovoughout the Ctty.
• Wor1c with Communlty DeveEopment ta ensure ttuet adequate hafic and transportation
miUgeUon is prouided.
. Campaete a sbeet tnventory and assaswrmM ot ell City streets and albw devebpmerrt at
a siz year sVeet rtiaster plsn and a 20-yesr paYament management ptsn in 2007.
Qudoet Summasy
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actwl 6udge4 Budget
Persormel - FTE Ecuhralerrts
5enior Enginees - Treflic 0.4 1.0 1.0
Pubk Worics 5uperintendent 1,0 1.0 1.0
Consbvction Inspettor 1.4 1.0 1.0
Sertiior F_ngineer (PtanninglGranta) .Q1' Q-A Q 4
Tdal FTEs 2.95 3.4 3.4 i
Bud4et Cletatl
Salarlea. Wages. & BenefRs S 141,605 $ 188,354 $ 211,636
Supplics 5.044 13,280 16,950
Services 8 Chargss 531,737 1.000,000 1,210.680
Intargwemmerttai PaymenEs 2,434,537 4.424,384 2.460,700
Interfund Ctiargcs 34.300 167.140 120.856 ~
Tata! Stree! Fund $ 3.14~7.223 S 5,~ 80~158 $ 4,
I
Fund: 102 Artefial Street Fund Spokane valisy
oept: 044 MN Budget
102 - Arteriai Street Fund
The Arterial Strest Fund accounts for the receipt and sxpenditune ot the Sffite-levied
motor vehide fuel tax distributed to the City in acoordanoe with Stats RCW 62.36.020.
These revenues will be transf+ertsd to the Street Capftl Ptolects Fund for the oortstruction.
Budoet Summarv
2005
2004 Ameitded 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budflet Detall
Transfer to Street Capita! Projeds S 134,941 $ 670.400 $ 282,270
Transfer to Capital GrarTts Fund - 186.000 236,385
Improvements to Arterials - 229,603 219,617
Total Arterial Street Fund $ 1341941 $ 1,085,003 $ 738,272
Fund:103 Traiis b Paths Fund spokane vaney
Dept: 103 2006 Budget
103 - Tralls 8 Paths Fund
The Trails & Paths Fund accounts for the receipt and expenditure of the Sta6e-levied
matur vehicle fuel tax disUibut+ed to the City in accordanoe with State RCW 47.30.050_
These revenues origirtabe from .42% of motor vehicle fuel tax attributable to Street
Maintenance. These iunds are restricted for lhe purpose vt constructing new trails and
paths tfiroughout the City. No expenditures are budgeted fvr this fund in 2005 or 2006.
58
Fund:105 HateUMobel Fund 8paksne vatl%r
p,ept; 105 2006 Budpet
105 - HoteiJlMota! Fund
The HoteVMobel Fund acoounts for the receipt and expendihure of a speclal excise tax of
Mro peroeM on tt►e sale or charge made forthe fumisliing of bdging urxier RCW 62.08.
These funds wip be used solety for the purpose of paying all or any part of the cost of tourtst
promotbn, acquisfti~on or operation of tourism-mlated faal'ities, and marlceOng of speclal
events and festivals designed to attract tourisLs.
Budaet Summarv
2006
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget 6udget
8UQqet Detail
Tourism Promotion $ 450,383 $ 397.827 $ 360,667
Interfund Charges - 40,000 40,000
Tatal HateUMobel Fund $ 450,383 437,827 $ 400,667
59
Fund: 204 L.inlbed Tax General Obilgatlon - Debt Service Fund sPokum vafty
o+pt 204 2006 Budpat
204 - Limited Tax General Oblicetion - Dabt Sarvice Fund
The LTGa - Debt Service Fund colleds and distributss monies received and paid fof
long-berm debt obiigations. Revenue to tfiis fund consists of money raceived from the
Pubilc Faality Oistrict and City revenue, whirh wiil be used to pay annuat debt obligations
on outstanding bonds.
Budoet Sumrnwv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budoet DeWil
Uebt Servioe an Mlrabeau Bonds $ 600,000 $ 397,745 $ 414,000
Debt Setvice on Street Bonds 200,000 185,090 186,000
Total Debt Service Fund S 800,000 $ 582,835 $ 600,000
62
Fund: 3011302 Capital Projeeta 3 Special Capital Projects Funds Spoksne vauay
, 2006 Budget
3011302 Cauital Prolects 8 Saeclsl Csoital Prolects Funds
These funds accuunt for the coqection and expenditure of the real estate excise tax levied
on all safes of real estate. The tax is levied in two phases of a quarter of a percent each.
The rtrst quarter percent ot the real estate excise tax (REET 1) must be spent an capital
impravements idenbfied in a capital improvements plan. This REET ltax is accourrted for
in tfie Capital Projects Fund 301.
The second quarter percent (REET 2) mey anly be levied by cities thet are plannlng under
the Growth Managemsnt Act. These funds must be used for a capital projecl.
'fhe REET 2 hax is accounted for in the Special Capftal Projects Fund 302.
Revenues accumulated in these funds will be used as matching funds for construction
projects and witl be transferred to otfier Capital Project Funds.
BudrW Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
301 - CaRital Proiects Fund
Transfer to Cap"rtal Grartts Fund $ - $ - $ 1,117.000
Transfer to Debt Service 92,643 92,545 93,000
Transfer to Parks Master Plan - 40,000 -
Transfer to General Fund 22,996 - -
Capital Projeds - REET 1 - 1,773.359 -
Parics Capital Improvements - 200.000 -
Tatal Capital Projects Fund $ 115,639 $ 21105.904 $ 1,210,000
302 - Saecjal Caaital Proiects Fund
Transfer to Street Capital Fund $200,000 $ 112,600 $ 977,713
Capital Projects - REET 2 - 1.707,312 -
Transfer to Debt Service 92.643 92,545 93,000
Total Special Capital Projects Fund $ 282,643 S 1,912,457 $ 1,070,713
d
63
Fund: 303 Street Capital Pro}ecta Fund spokne» vaqhr
2006 Budpet
303 - Street CaQltal Prolects Fund
The Street Capital ProJeas Fund eccounts for monles used to finance the 6 year
trarisportelion improvement plan. RQVenues are transfers hom tfis Arteria! Stree!
Ftutd, Caa+tal Ptvjects Fund, and Spedal Capttal Ptajeda Fund and the bond sale proceeds.
Expencfitures are aften for matching funds for Transportation Imprvv+emeM Board and
ather grartts.
Budaet 8ummsnr
2006
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budact DgWI
Road Design d Constnxhon Pro)ects
Pines/Mansfield, wlbur Rd. tn Pines $ - $ 1,101,030 $4.029,000
Sulihran Road Extension - 5,000 5,000
161h Avenue - Project 1 2,480 - -
18th Avenue - Project 2 263,789 151.000 -
Mission Avenue 11,692 - -
8arker Road - Boone to Spokane Rivet Bridge - 1,914,000 2,578,000
Batlcer Road • 6th to 32nd - - 40.000
Park Roed - Project 2 148.082 - -
Evetgreen Road 365,280 20,000 -
Sullivan Road and 4th Signei 14.511 - -
Valley Couplet 1,712 - -
Valley Couplet - Project 2 - - -
Supivan Bddge 31,145 - -
Road Preservation PrvjecYs
pther ptesesvetton ProJecta 200,401 750.000 1,033,843
CoMingency - 150,000 150,000
Road Pavebaak (Sepdre F1lmfrtgtlon)
Sfpple 106.206 • -
Veradale Phase II 339,772 - -
WeathetwoodlOwens 30,835 - -
Camahan - 148,300 -
South Greenacres - 23,000 •
Veradale Heigtrts - - 175,000
Vera Terrace - - 90.000
Upriver Temace - - 90.000
Eledric Raitroad - - 135,004
M'tsc. Road Pavebadc Projects - 23,000 10,000
Total Street Capftal Pro}ects Fund $ 1,5 $ 4_ 8,335.843
64
Fund: 304 Mirabeau Point Capital Project Fund spokan. vsllsY
pept 384 2006 Budgst
304 - Mfrabeau Polnt Capitsd P_rolect Funcl
Mirabeau Point is a multi-use regional project located at 2426 Disoovery Place which
will be operabed by the Cihl.
CenberPiaoe prvvides spaoe for a Conference Center Wing, Senior Center wng and
a Great Room Wing. The portion of CenterPlace used for the Conferenve Center
Wing and Great Room Wing is be+ng developed as a"regional faCtity" as defined
in RCW 36.100 and 35.57.020.
Budoet Summilrv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
6udget Detail
Construction in Progress $6.050.570 $ 3,000,000 $783.205
Bond lssue Costs 815 - -
Total Mirabeau Point Project Fund $ 6,051.185 $ 3.000,000 $783,206
Fund: 305 Street Bond Capitsl Projecta Fund spokans vau.y
pept: 305 2006 Budget
385 - Street Bond Caottal Proiects Fund
The Street Bond Gapital Projeds Fund accounis for monies received fmm bond
proceeds which will be used for various capita) street pro)ecb.
Buduet Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budaet Detail
Transfer to Streei Capibl Projects $ 1,174,323 ! 406,000 $ 902,460
Bond Issue Costs 304 - - ~
Total Street Bond Capital Fund $ 1,174,627 $ 406,000 $ 9Q2,4Fi0 I
Fund: 307 Cspitsl Csranb Fund spokwn v.ftqr
o.pr 307 2ooe Budg.t
347 - G4oitsl Orartts Fund
The C.apital Grsrft Fund eocounts kx capital im4omment Pmlecto ftsWed PartoNY M
pranl prooeeda from dher povemmentel agendes, such ss TIB. SRl'C end BRAC
Revenues to UU fund ere (rom grant proceeda and transfies irom ofhar sperJel ravenue
fixlQs
8udmt 3uniman
2005
2004 /►tnsnded 2006
Actusl Budget Budget
@mip.d Ddsb
$atkw RoeQ Reoons2nx:iion $638.00(7 S 1.114.000 S 97.000
24ah avedwe sWewaik Projea I as.ooo - -
-
eu, Avam,e - +.136.000
Bmaclway Avenue - 812.000 800.000
WeW4ey Avenue - 344.000 -
Pas* Road - 164.000 -
Diahwnan Mica Road - 11,0D0 180.000
qppW*my Road - 218.000 250.000
Vapey Canida - 200,000 1,340,000
APoewaY BhW. - TsdNrfey Rd to Hodpes - 287,000 1,919.i100
BriOQinq !As VaDey - Paiic Rd/SNSF Gtade - - 2.450,000
Man{pome►y Ave. Inlay 02 - Aryonne Uo Universft - - 471,000
Dishtttan Mka Rd Rehab - 1 st Ave lo Sprsgue - 135.000 -
Val" Cauplel. Pmjed it2 - 234.000 -
IVgonne Rd Oveiiay - Indisna lo AAontpomery • 317,000 307,000
Misejon Ave. SidewNc - MuW to Unkirsily - - 417,000
Total Cepitaal C:raMs Fund 637 000 $S,0^ 'f_ $ 8.211.000
Fund: 708 8atltw' Brtdge - Fedsril Gratrt Fund spo+can. venry
pept 30 2006 8u0pM
308 - Barkor BrWae - Fadarwl f.imnt Fund
The Bartcer Brtcfge - Federa! Grent Fund was crraated to acoourtt far fhe tevenues and
expendU+es assacroted with the Barkar Roed &idW Replacemen! PtojeQ. Thfs projed
M fupyt tunded by BRAC graM proceeds and wil cost appraodmetety S8.000.000 over the
oouse of Iho tsed few yaem
sudaet Summuv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actml Budqet Budgat
Badw Road Bridpe Ropteoemerrt ProJeCt $ 53 $ 350,000 i 558.000
66
Fund: 309 Parica Capital Projects Fund Spokan. valley
Dept: 309 2006 Budget
309 - Parks Caoital PrQlects Fund
The Parlcs Capital Projects Fund is an ailocated resenre of monies specif►cally d$signated
for the Parks and Recreatbn Capital pian.
Budoet Summarv
2006
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
Budaet Qet~i1
Park Master Capital Plan Pending $ - = 550,000 $ 1,300,000
Total Parks Capital Project Fund $ - $550,000 $ 1,3001000
Fund: 310 Civlc Buildings Capital Projecffi Fund spoksrw vsqey
pvpt: 310 2Q06 Budget
310 - Civfc Builditma Caoital Prolects Furtd
The Civic Buikiings Capital Projects Fund is an albcated reserve ot monies specif~cally
designated for future consiruction ot a Civic Buildings.
Budaet Summarv
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget '
Total Civic Buildings Capital Fund $ - S 500.000 s 1,100,000 '
~
67
Fund: 402 Stormvrabr MenagsmeM Ftutd spokane VaNvy
o.vr 402 2m Bud9.c
402 - Stormwsbr ManaaemeM Fund
The SbormwaW Manegemenl fund aocoun`s for reoeipt and expencfiture ot the s6oumvveiler
fee. This tee is Isvied on an annual trasks based upon a number of equhrelent residerttiai
units attactre0 w the parcel.
The expendibures are used for sbrmwater cortsWction and manegement thraugh bath
the StrBet Degartment and Spakane County.
AccotnplEshmeft fw 2005
• Deslgned and implemerdad sdudons fot sxistir►g drainage pt+obletrts.
. Perfortned f{oodpiatn pecimit engineering review.
. Began devetopment of a six year plan for construction of r8gionad end semMegbnai
drainege facgities.
. Managed tha swaie inspection prngram.
• DeveloQment of the Rsgional sturmwater dssign manual.
coais ror Zoos
• De,sign and impkment sduHons fbr existng drainage prvbiems.
. Periorm floodplain permit engineering review,
• Martage the swaie inspedien progtam.
. Camplete six ysar plari for aanstnsctbn of regiortat and sertg-regional drainage facilities.
. Adopt and implement the RegioxW Stortmnrater Design Marwal.
Budaet Summant
2005
2084 Amended 2006
Actual Budget Budget
PerBonne1- F7'E Eaulvalant~
Engineer 0.0 1.0 1.0
Engirmmring Tedhnidan Q:4 1-0 m
ToW FTEs 0.0 2.0 2.0
Budget Oebil
Salanes, Wages. S 8enefits $ - S 151,112 $ 147,774
Supplies - 22.700 13,490
Serviaes b Charges 65,183 780.505 84,939
Inl+ergovenmental Payments 9.858 817,102 815,184
CapitalOutl2iy - 20,000 350,000
Interfund Transfers - 259,647 267,752
Totaf Stamwater Fund $75~,441 $ 2,061.026 3 1.659,139
Fund: 501 Equlpment Rentel S Replacement Fund spotans v.Rey
pept: 601 2006 Budget
641 - Eauioment Rerrtal & Reoisoement Fur►d
The Equjpment Rentai 8 Repiacement Fund (ER&R) accounts for the cost ot maintaining
and repiacing City vehides and equipment for all City depactrnents. The ER&R fund is an
IMemal Service fund.
The fund accumulates the resources for vehicle and equipment replacements in the fund_
The Funds or Departrnents using the vehicle or equipment pay the scheduled
reptacemeM fee.
RSplacement funds are being collected on the telephone system, computer netwosk
sysbem, desktop computers, and vehides. Maintenanoe and service charges for cbpiem,
telephones, and the inbemet are also charged to funds through this departrnenL
The fund also firtances and administers a fleet of pool cars for use by City departrnents.
Accomvlishmenta for 2005
• Administered an accounang system for reptacement costs for city equipment
• Setup and adminisler an inventory tracking system.
Goals tor 2006
• Cantinue to administer and refine the acxounting sysbem for replacement costs.
Budwt SummsN
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actuel Budget Budget
Budqet Detail
Supplies $ 8,926 $ 7,500 $ 7,504
Services & Charges 308 25,000 50,000
CapifialOutlay 2,388 240,392 635,757
Totsl ERBR Fund $ 11,622 $ 272,892 693,257
Fg
Fund: 502 Risk Management Fund spokane vaN.y
pspt: 602 2006 Bud@et
502 - Rlsk Manaaement Fund
The City of Spokane Vatley Ri.sk Management Fund is estabtished to account for
insurance oosts, claims settlement and adminishation of a risk management safiery
Pro9ram-
Thes fund also aocourtts for the funding of unempbyment cMaims tt►rough the
State of Washington.
Accomultshmerrts for 2005
• Administered an arcrounting system fur the risic management intemal service fund.
Goals for 2006
• Continue to administer and nefine the risk management intemal servioe fund accountfng
system.
Budaet Surnmanr
2005
2004 Amended 2006
Actual Budge# Budget
BudQet Detail
Senrices 8 Charges $111,066 $ 140,828 $ 159,939
Total Rfsk Managemerrt Fund $ 111.U68 $ 140,828 $ 159.939
70
car d spoan. v.u.y
c+t+Rr ap.r%apww ra+ 20N
Yln4wu
Polftt Iktnbf
Bond Ebwt Y~w1 lliwt
o.p.rawK c.ap" arn o..onpuon roW ha.~..a. hoo..e. mur 11 mm r w,e Tw-- sRTC- awAr---
70I B~ Capldl Fund
Hod
PMrNMUna!lvId. YVNbu►Rd. bPkm f 4.02D.000 00,000 1.fl0.000 I.tY1.000
awam R.o.e E,s.nsM e.oon s.ooo
ewfw Rood • Ooon+ a SpoRM Wwr Bifdp. I,bM.o0D 815,100 2.CaZ.4Oo
BnAw Rwd • Ca+ b 320 I0.000 10.000
~ flwynwi b 86*1111n) 14.463 11,183
SrfiOw RoN ( lah+ Am t0 81Or Rd) 1f,m 19m
nm.uw,y.+d:.r,~,M ivo.aoo aer.s» 131.au
mw- v+aom ctem m 24w,t eoo.ooo qoo,ooo
T
WndMb HoWf~ 116.000 176ADD
Vvs Tarwn 90.000 81770 727P
lOIvK Twnon YO,wd W000
E~le R42raM 135,000 05,UDO
wnw- Rwd vwoOrcn Prapaa 10'000 10.G00
307 GaplW Oranb furW
Bwtut itnrd 97.13D0 f 7.000 a0.000
Aaftwor RoW 24SO,ODO 331750 ?ti.?60
wlMry CartAcr - Prooa12 1,3410.000 7W000 31.640 621,610
,►ppkm" eiw - r.efiri.ir aa e Hoap.s 1.219.0oa 30.0oo +.eeo.ooo
HrWpfnp ft VMlrr 2A5G.Q00 121,000 2.227.000
Bmw,iow Awrr+e lOO.tl00 100.DG0 aQ.000
MaAqam.ry AviL 1ft I= 471,000 411,000
Mqoner RO 4-tYq 3W.000 41,ME 1o6.356
WWanAw lilOwrML 417,000 b6,000 301.000
Uht:trn Miql ROMI 1w,000 JI Jp0 M.100
10i BaAa Fw! GrnN FurW
B~ Roed 8r1d@e Reaiau4W10n 5N,000 'iQE.000
U4 Mnb"u Point
Corovucmm M Proqt4n I43,24S JRX=
tWrl WpttW l.apnrMmirw l1~TriA~/ 1 T lklamm! M
'ReW EoIsle ExdWo Tu 1
"F2rt HYU EuMw Ta 2
"'trfrrwaAwmn YvarvvilrtmrM Bo~rA ffi1W Ra+W1
-'SpaL- R4a+~l T-rwparuuon CaunW (11WwtM P++w)
""'Br1dfN RaPON-MKrt AWboeY CawnNw lFrdad FudQ
r...o urrq
aqr r sp.a- v.rv
aea
• ~ ~ ~ ,r ~ ~
,ft ►
tm rurwG" 10 r.n
aervTr cm wwnaM ~ o 10
QtY ATTOPNI[Y 1 0 1-0
4'DwAl1MTt dpyEi.pPY!!/(T OftfCTplt 1 p 1.0
pSJlLYC 1WqtS5 CM01140TOR 1 D 1,0
IlAAN(:f pMqECTpR 10 10
a
cwrrcs A PIECREArON oOMron t.o I
LarV aEx lc ~ o
0N00eEN 10 1.0 1 D
M,M1'I1040 MA►NGFJI 10 10
CIE-R1T`I CJTY A'1'TOIIIiE`I 10 1 R
(EflFEpi+IACE pp011pWAT41q 10 10
SEmm lMGq1EER lA 11 ) I
ASMT/W T EM3fE8A lA 20
iNG►~E~RIMOTFWqrICyW 14 1D J.0
5EIY(A PUNIVl11 10 1.0
AssnCU~TE PLOsMEn - CUFMW I a 1
nssacaTf rtArrNM • ta+a-tenM 10 , o
A5Si$TANt Iq/~ 10 10
C:tH7E Ef6OqC61E!(T 0Ffi1GEM 7-0 Y 0
tiWl[1M4i KFTCIKL l0 10
a0liAK.:1OPOECtC71 M 1D f 0
BUri.0'10 OmpEi.I Df11 0 ~
r7Ae9 EJUWINEA 10 1
pEtHM 13PMU n/ 40 ~ p
OU{ppN40 'fFCMi[311H f,0 10
PLOJC YKYiKS BUM-1IIIfTf3ipfiW 1 D 1.6
R[CltrJ1TKJN COOrt011MTO1t 10 1
AOWIPU5i1lATlYE AINl1'qi t D tA
AuuWrAAInsuoaET Ak4hLrsi 2a sa
PUIiIC W0RMMTtpn OFRCEq 10 LO
MUWM RESOUIIC£ MNl'Bt + V 10
ACGOUN(M IIAfMQF.R 1.0 1,0
tf SPicw67 1 p !.0
SE7eOR GEiYTER SPECLUJP 1 D ~ y
o=t3JiY CtT7 CLCt1K 01 0.! 1
AL71MNBTNJ171VEAMfANT 2D 7.0 1.0 10 10 1.4 9.0
arMX, +SW,wr e 10 t e
Ac,oourrrvra rci.,-HNcuw 9.o 10
wJrrteww~.'e WoKKEA to 10
c:a.srtr.~criv. Te: c~on a r
sS ~a 0 a
! ft" I
r.w .r..e
city o+ spokane v.ney
FTE Count 6ry Year
2006 Budgot
2005 2005 2008 Budget
Autttiorizae! FTE Proposecf
Dspartrnent FTEs Addkions FTEs
Executive 8 L.egistaUve Suppact 4.5 - 4.5
Opelataons 6 Admfnishoave Services:
Deputy City Allarzager 6.0 - 6.0
F'tt►artoe 6_0 - 6.0
Le}al 2.0 - 2.0
Human Resources 1.5 - 1.5
puwtc worcs 9.0 - 9.0
Plartnfng d CornnxuMly Develqpr»ent
Ptanning 8.0 - 8.0
Buifding 13.0 - 13.0
Parks 8 Recrea6on:
Parks Admin 2.0 - 2_0
Recxeation 1.0 - 1.0
Senbr Certter 1.0 - 1.0
CentarPlace 3.0 - 3.0
Steet Fund 2-8 - 2,8
Stotmwatef Fund 2.0 - 2.0
TOTAl. 61.80 • 61.80
2006,.Work Force.~Comparison>. - =
` -,Fj,-r71 a,~s.Zw§$4~4 tQ11 1~~;tivftti P~ufai3a~ri ofr
J
C17Y ~ POPUU4TfON FUII-TiME~ ; FART-TIME
Seattie 573, 004 9,496 907
Tacoma 198.100 3,294 51
3 karx 196,700 1,9U8 9
Beilewue 115.500 1,191 54
EvercK 87,500 1,038 15
Vancowef 154.800 1,026 24
Kent 84.920 758 26
Bellin ham 72.320 748 53
Yakima 79,480 648 14
Renton 56,840 569 23
Kennewick 60,410 351 8
Federai Wa 85.600 283 20
L.akewood 58.650 219 10
ShoreNne 52.580 120 17
S kane Valle 85,010 60 3
AVERAGE 1.443 82
Redrnond 47,600 545 40
Richtand 43,520 543 13
p1 ia 43.330 509 46
Auburn 47,470 452 2
Kirkiand 45,740 399 35
Bremerton 34,580 339 40
L nnwood 34,830 331 26
P 811u 35,638 315 24
Lon iew 35,340 290 25
Edmonda 39,860 270 7
Bothe(I 31,d00 254 7
Walia Walla 30,630 253 9
Pasco 44,190 242 9
Lac 33.180 206 8
Ma ville 29.460 201 10
Sammamish 36,640 67 0
Universl Place 30,980 58 3
Burisn 31,040 40 13
AVERAGE 295 18
Sovrce: Associatian ai Washington Cities Survey: 2005 Full Time
74
~ "~m
~
j ~lll k~Ctl!11NiI tilTti 1'IZI)11-114 ANi1 fIIs FUf2Y
; iiu c'unnol l(,I,k 1o flte /ttlure t•c,tt tIc) Nu1 lv:01V Mc F?.ISr .
Un %lay 21. _'(►U?, voters within tlk C:ity approved inwrporatiun uf the Lity ot SpuLine
Valley, afiich is the second largest ciry in the County and the eighth largest ciry in the
Statc, with approximately 85,010 residents. The City iricarpoiated as vf March 31. 1-0031.
7he assessai valuatian of real property within the boundar+es af the City for taxatikIl,
purposcs is estimated for 2045 tax collaction to bc approximately 55,032,000,000.
Spokane Valley encompasses approximately 3$.2 squsrc cnilcs of land area.. It ha~ :ui
extensivc rr.tail tax base and is home ta several major suto dealerships and the Spokww
Valley Mall, which inc}udcs ovr.r 700,000 square teet of gross leasable floor erea- Thrrc
are an e-timnted 4,000 busines.us in SEx►kanc Vnlley with estimatcd retail sales of S I.66
biUion.
The first pcrmanent setiler in the Sr►okane Vullcy was Antnine Plante, a retired French-
CaaadiIIn trapper. Mr. Plaatc built a cabin atar the Spokanc Rivcr in 1849. fivm which
he aperated a small Hudson's Bay Campany trading pasi. (hhcr settlers bcgan auiving
in lhis area betwaen 1865 and 1882. "Firsts" to occur in Spokane Va1ley include the
setUer in 1849. 6rst busincss and ferry in 1850, the first starc and bridgc in 1862, the Cu~~_c
house in 1866, and the first post offioe in 1867. All of these "firsts" occuTred hefom tht
arrival in 1$73 of lamcs Glover who was cansiderod the "Father of Spokanr."
In 1883, the Nonhem Pacific Railroad opened the west up with the transcc►ntinental
railroad. The ncw railroad, coupled wilh the discovery of silver in notth Idaho, cr~:_Iicd
an in}lux of reople to the Spofcane Valley area. Within a fcvv years the
J i i : ,
[ . . _ . . . . . 1 . . , . . . . . . i i . . . . . . . ' . ~ , ' . . . ' . . i . , , f . . i
autxL W'ithin 20 ycurs 3000 ac-ms oi-iiry land [iaci been cunvcnui into fenilc facm 1..., .
The ficst irrigation systems were constructai bctwren 1849 and 1905. The Vallcy
paPulation gtew from 1,000 residents at the hun of the ocntury to nearly 10,000 by 192,
During this time apple growing becarrte the praiominant agricultural crnp with nearl;• 'miilion apple trm being planted by 1912. As the papulaiioa of the Valley increasck ~
small cammunities with cburches, schools, bLLSinesscs, community clubs, und oth:_
organizatioas t}uivcd.
f'rior to Worfd War it, the federal gavcrnmcirt made a decision to huitd gn alurninum
piant in Spokanc Vallcy alang the Spokane Rivcr. Addicionally, the i'oderal government
7>
idcrttifird a nccd fnr watehouse spuce nnd fBCilitics !o support cnastsl sciivities during the
war. In 1942, Spokanc Vulley was chosen as b sitc for onc of thcycs Inland Supgiy
Depois. Thc Naval Storagc Yards arc auw thr Valley Indust.ria! Parle that has 5,000,000
square feei of gross leasable flaar srea.
Rapid grvwth cantinucd in Spokaric Velloy throughnut the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. A1ong
with ttiis continued g,tvwth camc concems rcgardiag the impacx of the davelopmcnt an
the Vallcy cnvironmenL Citizens' conctrns were rclatcd to impacts to lal:es in the arca as
well as the aquifcv undcdying a majority of the Spokane Valley. No protcctions were put
into placc tn addresc these issues: sanitary sewcrs wmre not raquirod for new constructioo.
Stcady residendal and commercial growth continucd in the Spakaae Valley thrvugtiout
the 80s and 90s. [iigh tech companies faliawcd Hewlen Packard into the libcrty Lakc
area. Latcr, stime high tcch companies moved ima the lndustrial Psrk. Thc Statc Baard
of Hcatih thteatened to entict a moratarium an ncw developmGnt in 1983. unless sewering
of the Vsllcy began. ln rGSponsc, Spokanc County developed a waxtewater managcment
plan thai pui into motion oonstruction of a sewet trunk line and a sanitary scwcr svstem
wzs made available tn the citi7ens of Spokane Valiry.
MAJOR PUBLIC FACLLITIES AND PARKS IN SPOKANE VALLEY
lbcrc are public facilities and a number of parks in the City of Spokane Valley. TlC
Spokane Indians, a minor Icague bascball tcam, pleys its hame games at Avista Stadium,
locatod ju;t insidc the city limits nn the east side af Havsne Strret. lhis stadium is one of
the fincst facilitics in the Northwest I.x,aguc and can seat 7,200 spextators. Situatai next
dcwr to Avista Staditun is t!re 5pokanc Counry Fair aad Euposition Center. 'ihe
Fairgrounds was cxQandcd in 2003 with the oonstruction of a new cov-crcd grandstacid
that was apenM at the 2003 Intcrstau Fair. Various othef sfwws and evrnu arn ccld
throughout the yeu' at the Fairgmunds.
hiirabeau Paint Psrk, situuted on 54,5 gcre.s of IAnd. Incatod Eictwcen Pines Road snd
Ever grer.n Road interchanges (north of I-90), along the south benjc of the Spnkanc River,
i;s the homc of GcntcrPlaoc.
CenterPlacc, a 54,000 square foot facility, wtis built to acoommodatc a regional sc.~rtiar
ctntcr. education and busihess centrr. and a cultural and pcrfarmiag arts ccnter.
Mirabcau Mendows is a l 5-acre parcel of lanci providing enothrr srea for cotnmunity
activitics, such as family gec-togethcrs and gamcs, outcioor music, corparare autings,
farmers mar{:ets, arts and crafts, and other spcciel events in MimbCau Paint Patk.
Vaitcyfcsl, sn snnuAl cammunity event thgt is sponsorod by uxiividuals and businrsses in
aur Gity, was held in this prsrk in 2004.
The City af Spokanc Valley operatcs a numbcr of parks wiihin the City. Below is a
summary of lhese par~:s:
76
Park Namc Park Cisasifiation Park Size
BalCour Communi Park 2.8 aacs
Brown's Communitv Park 81 acsrs
Casile Cotnmuni Park 2.7 acres
Ecl ecliff CAmmunitv Park 4.8 acces I
Mirabeau Point Park Cammunit !Re 'onal Park 54S acres ~
M c Paini Natural Area 31.0 acres
Park Road Pa,) S ial Llsc 2.0 acres
Sullivan Communi Park 10.3 acres
Teasce Vicw Communi Park 9.1 acres
Vallcy Mission and Valley Community Park 27.2 acrcs
Mission Soath 8t Pool
Vallc Seaior Centcr S ial Use 2.0 acres
Centennia) Trsi) Trail 7 lincar miles I
THE F't''1'l'RF: OF tiP!)K.ANF, VALLEY
,Spvk<<n" Falleti'. 41 c'nnrn;tutity ~~/upnurrruritt- ►s~lc~~re rr~iiti•i~lu:rls ant1.lamili~~s c.a►~ ,~Jr~~►4•
and play, mid husircess wil! flourish Qnd prnsper.
Thc potential of Spokane Valley is tremendous, writh sn adequste tax base anui roam Cor
expansion bf rC5ideriUal, commercial, and industrial growth,. Spakane Valley rivals other
cities in EasGen Washingiaa in tccros of population aad significance in tbc region.
Thc Gity is committfld to pienning for the futum. it has creatcd a rough draft of iv; first
Comprrhec~5ive Plan, whieh is undetgoing community review. ln addition, the City i.;
aevrlupilig a I'arks :u1d Recrcation 'vlsstc, f'1an.
77
Appendix A
EYPLOYEE POSITION CLA331FICATION
MONTHLY SALARY SCHEDULE
2008 Salsry 3chedule
Postbn TitM Gfade 2006 Ra e
Ci Ma r Unctassifred
Deputy Ci Ma r 21 $7,020 - S9,000
C' 21 7,020 - 9 000
Communi Deveb DirecW 21 7,020 - 9 000
Finance Diredor 21 7,020 - 9,000
PuWic Works 0'trector 21 7,020 - 9,000
Parks and Recreatian Dtrecior 19 5,686 - 7,290
C En ►r*--r 19 5,686 - 7,290
Piann Ma r 18 5,118 • 6 581
Buitidi Offiaal 18 5,118 - 6,561
Senior E tneer - CapiW P Deveio rtuenl 18 5,118 • 6,561
Senior En heer - Traffic, CIP Ptann rants 17 4 606 - 5,905
De u Git 16 4,145 - 5 314
City CIeAc 16 4,145 - 5,314
En kiew 16 4.145 - 5,314
Senla ptamer 16 4,145 - 5,314
Accountin Man 16 4,145 - 5,314
IT Specia[W 15 3,731 • 4 783
Assoclate Planner 15 3,731 - 4.783
Assistant E ineer 15 3,731 - 4.783
Pubiic Works Su d ndet[t 15 3 731 • 4,783
CenterPtaoe Coofdinetor 15 3,731 - 4,783
Human Resource Anat t 14 3,358 - 4,305
AccountanL'Bud t AnaiW 14 3,358 - 4.305
ArJministatfve Analyst 14 3 358 - 4,305
Assistant Planner 14 3.35$ - 4,305
Buiki In II 14 3,358 - 4,305
Plans Examiner 14 3.358 - 4,305
GIS Technician 14 3 359 - 4,305
Pubiacc Irtformetran Officw 14 3,358 - 4 305
EftneemV Tecfmician 14 3,358 - 4,305
Matntenance/Canstrucbon Inspector 13-14 3.022 - 4,305
Recxcation Caordmator 13-14 3.022 - 4,305
Code Eniwcement afficer 13 3,022 - 3,874
Buiklin Ins I 13 3 U22 - 3,874
Planni Technician 13 3,022 • 3,874
De Ci CLN1c 12-13 2,720 - 3,874
Seniot Cenber S atist 12-13 2,720 - 3,874
Mainlenance Wcxker II 12 2720 - 3,487
A,dmin#50aM Assistant 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
Petmft Spec iaftst 11-12 2,448 - 3,487
Accauntm Techniaan 11-12 2,448 - 3.487
Maintenance Wotker 10-12 2,203 • 3,487
pifica ,4ssistant I) 10-11 2,203 - 3,138
iDffioe Assistant t 9-10 1,983 • 2 82d
Recrea6onAssistant 5 1,301 - 1668
80
Appendix B
OUTSTANDING GENERAL OBUGATION BONDS
OEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Totai
Year Principal Interest Requirements
2006 $ 175,000 $ 414,535 $ 569,535
2007 185,000 411,035 596,035
2008 190,000 406,872 596,872
2009 205,000 401,173 606,173
2010-2014 1,200,000 1,885,112 3,085,112
2015-2019 1,655,000 1,612,068 3,267,068
2020-2024 2,480,000 1,135,250 3,615,250
2025-2029 2,090,000 519,250 2.609,250
2030-2033 940,000 112,500 1,052,500
$ 9,124,000 $ 6,897,795 $ 16,017,795
81
CITY OF SPOkAiNE VALLEY
Glossary of Budget Terms
Accrna! Basb - A basis of accounting Capirtxl tmprovcmcai - Expenditunes
in whic6 rcvenues and cxpcnditures are rclatod to acquisition, expansion or
rocordcd at the tirne they axur as retwbilitatiun of an element af the
oppo5ed to when cash is actually governmcnt's pvysical plani; sometimcs
roreivrcl or spenL rrferrrd lo as infraswcture.
APPrnpriation - A legal authorization Capits! Ontlay - Fixed asse;ts that have
gantrd by the City Cauncil to make general value of S5,000 or morc and
expcnditures and ta incur obligstions for have a usefiil ooonncnic lifetimc of mom
a spacific purpase. thsn anc ycar.
Aasessed Valuatinn -'The valuarion set Capital Projec! - Maj4r construetic,n,
upcm real estatc and certain personal acquisitian, or renovation sctivities
property by the County Asscssor as a which add value to governmeni's
basis for levying praperty taxes. physical asscts or signiCc.antly increasc
thcir usefiil life, also called capital
Antborized Puaitinns - Employrc improvcmcnLs.
pa:icions, which arc autborized in the
adopted budset, to bc fillcd during the Cspital Projects Fund - A fund crcmed
ycar, to ac.count far all cesources ar►d
expes►ditwes usod for the acyuisition of
Boad - A loag-Uerm promise ta repay a fixai assets except thase financai by
spxifiai amount (the fect amount of the entErgrise fcusds.
bond) on a particular datc (thc maturity
datc). Tbe most cammnn types oF bonds Coatingcocy - A budgetary teserve set
arc gencral obligation rrvenue twnds. aside far cmcrgcncics ar unfarescxn
Bnads am primarily used w finance expcndittues not otherwige hudgetod.
caPital Pro1ects.
Contractual Seniccs - Sesvicxs
Budge! - A plan of financial aciivity For rcndemd to e gavernment by privgte
a srecified period af time (fiseal ycar ar ftrms, rndividufils, or ather govemmcntal
biennium) indicaiing all planued agencies_
revrnues and expcnscs for the hudgct
period. Debt Service - Payment of intemst attd
principal on borrowed moncy acoording
Budget Message - Tfic opcning sec:tion t0 8 pTCdCIC17ri1ned p8yI4ent SGhed11IC.
of the budgct that provides the City
Cuuncil and the public w7th a gcneral Departmeat -'fhe hasic unit of service
summary of the mosi impart.3n1 uspecis responsibility, encompassing a braad
of the budget, changes from the currcnt msndate of rclnted scrvicc
and pirvious years, and the vicws and responsibilities.
mcotnmendations of the Mavm.
8?
Dis-isioa - Can be u subunit of a that dciinc ac:ccptc:d acwunting
departmari which encompasscs a principles.
substantial portion of the dutics assigned
to a departmcat (e.g,. Building Divisian GASB - 7hc Govcmmcntal Accounting
in the Plaaning and Community Standurds Board, cstablish0d in 1985, is
Dcvclopmeut Uepartmcnt). the cument standard-scriing board for
governmentel GAAP.
Enrnmbrancc - Thc rommitment of
appropriated funds tu purchasc: an item Geoeral Fnnd - 7fie principaJ aperatine
or service. To encumbcr funds mcans ta fund af the City uSOd for genrr-al
sct aside or commit funds for a spocified govcmmental opcrations. Taxes ~id
future expenditure. fees thai geaenlly have no restriction un
thcir usC support il.
Eipeaee - Charges incwrcd (whether
paid immediatcly or unpaid) for Gr.nenl Obligatiun (G.O.) Bonds -
operaiions, mainttnRnce, intcrest or 'Chis type uf bond is backed by the full
uth+er chargts. faith, crsdit snd taxinz pc►wcr of the
govCrnmcnt isstting i t .
Fsce Valae -The amount of principal
that must bc paid at maturity for a bond Indirect Cost - A cust occe:~ [cir the
issue, functioning of the organizatioa as a
whole, but which cannot be identifiai
Fisal Year - A twclvo-month paiod with a spocific producl, functian or
designsind as the oPcratin6 Year for activity.
acaounting and budgctin8 Purpuscs in an
organi7ation. [nlraatrvctnre - Thc physical assels of
a govcrnment (e.g. strcets, wata, sewer,
Full-time Eqnivaleat Pasitioo (FTE) - public buildings, and patlcs)-
A fiill-timc or part-time pnsition
convertod to the docimal cquivalent of a Intcrtnnd Transfers -Ile movemeni
hill-time position based on 2,080 hours of monics bctwccn fimds of the same
per year. For example, a part-timc govemmental cntity.
pecson urorking 20 haurs per wcck
would be equivalcat of 0.5 af a fult-time l.evy - 7'o impase taxcs for the suppon
posiUnn. of the govcrnmcnta) activities.
Fuad - A fiscal entity with r+evcnues and Long-term Debt - Debt with a maturity
expnses thai are scgrcgatcd for the of more th:un one year aftcr the date of
Purpose of carrying out a specific issuancc.
purpase or activity.
Mluian Statement - A broad :;tatemeut
GAAP - Gencrally Acceptcd of the intended accomplishmrnt or b~Ltiic
Acxounting Principlcs. Unifomi purpose of :1 (JT(1(?laIll,
minimuun standards for financiul
accounting and recording, encompassing ModificJ :lccrual Accuunting -A
the c:onventions, rules, and procedures basis of ar.counting in which
CKQG1C11lUIeS ure ac:ctuixi but revenues RevenuC -Sources of income financing
ere accountod for wfien they become the operations of govemmenc.
mcasursble atui available. Sitce this
type of accounting basis is a Tua - Compulsory charges levied by a
oonscrvative financiaJ apprcach, it is govcrnment far the purpose of finnncing
recommendod as the standard fcx most servicrs perfonnod for the common
goveauneutal funds. benefl. This tzrm doa not include
specific chargcs madE againsi particular
Operating Budget - Tbe portion af the persons or property for current or
budget thai pertains to daily operatiaa.s perm$ncnc brnefits svch as spcciai
that provide basic gavcramental assessments. Neitha dors the term
services. inctude charges for services reudered
oaly ta tbase who pay, far mmplc,
Ordiiuace - A foimd legislativr sm-er servioe chargrs.
enactment by the City Council. If it is
not in canflict with any higher form of Linreservtd Fnnd Balance - The
law, such as a statute or coasiitutional patina of a fuad's balance that is nc>t
pmvisinn, it has the fuU force anci effcxt re.stricted For aspecific purpose and is
of lsw within the bnundaries of the svailable for general appropriation.
municipality to wluch it applics.
URer Chargrs - The paymeat of a fcc
Prngnm -'Ihe smallest organization for dinoct receipt af a public scrvicc by
that delivers a spocific set of sesvivcs. A the party who brocfits from the servioe.
Program may be an eatirr deparimrnt; ar
if a dtpartment cncompas.srs Vision Statemeni - A shart stetemcnt
signifcantly divcrsc responsibilities or that conveys the big picture of the
large woik- fatces, a single depurtment organizatian. [l is geaeml in scope, not
may be diNided into two Qf mom restricting. h answers the qucstion
~ro9mm ..Why2,.
Reserve - An accatmt usod to citha' sei
aside budgetcd revenucs that arc not
roquired for expctidituc'e in the currcni
budget ycar ar to earmark rewnues for a
spocific futurc purpasc.
Resolution - A rpvcial or tempotary
unier of a lcgisMve body-an order of
a lrgislntivc body requiring lcss Icgul
formalitv than an cxdinance or stntutc.
Resourcea - Tatal amounts available for
appraprinlion including cstimatrd
nevtroucs, futzd transfers, and begiiming
balanccs.
84
DR.aFI'
AUVAtiCE AGErUA
rur Planning Discussion Purpasc:s Unlv
s►s ot Scptember l, 2005 8:00 s.m.
YleASe notc this is awork in progress; items are tentative
T'a: Council & SWT
From: City Nfunngcr
Re: Drnft SeheJule f(tir lipcoming l'ouncil Meetings
September 13, 2005, ReEutar Mcetine. 6:00 p.m. (dur datc T6ursdav, September 1 ~
1. Publfc Hcaring: Cablc: Tc(cvision Franchisc -:41organ Koudcllu3 [1O minutes]
Canseat Ageada: Minutcs, Claims, Payroll; lntzrgavernmental Ageement for Cammute Trip
Rcdurtian; Resolution 05-019 (F,stabiishing location for aicofiol cotisumptian) [5 minutes]
3. First Reading Proposed (?rdinance .'\mending PUD - Marina SukuplCary Driskell [10 minutes]
4. Proposcd Resoiution: Itesolution rlmending Governance 34fanuul- Davc Mercier [10 cninutcsl
5_ Motion Cansideratian: Neiional Incident Menagement System (NIIvlS) - Cal Walker [10 minutes]
6. Administrativc Report:
a. Websitr Update - Carolbelle Branch [15 minutesJ
b. Amended Masier Fce Schedule - Tom Scholtens [lU minutes]
c. Outside A;gancies Allocntiaa of Funds DiscussiQn - I3nve 41erciar [20 minutes]
d. Planncd Unit Dcr•tlapment (PUD) Polity lssues - Marina Sukup ~ 15 minutes]
7. Information Only:
a. Infrasvucture Funding Mechanisms (fornierly Lm/RID) Cary DriskelllNeil Kerstcn
b. Review• of 2004 Coiitracts -?14orFan Koudelka
c. Spol:ane County Contruct Approvnl -1in3 Regor/Ntargan Koudclka
[estimated meeting: 12 5 min'' J
5eptember 20. 2005, 5tudv Se.vsioa.6:(10 n.m. (due dAte Thuraday, Septcmber 81
1. Second Rending Proposed Urdinance Amending PI.fD - Niarinu Sukup/Cary Driskril (10 minutes)
2. Dcfinitians nnd schedules oC pc:rmitted uses - Minrina Sukup (15 minutes)
3. Airport Overlay lonz - Marina Sukup (20 minutes)
4. Fee Resolution - Ken I'hompsan (15 minutes)
5. N1assage Psirlors/Beth Elouse5 - Cal Walker/Cary DriskeU (15 minutcs)
6. Amended Dept Emcrgency Management Contract - Cai WAlkar (10 minutes)
7. Discussion: Parks and Recreation hiasterPlan - htike Jackson (20 minutes)
8. Appieway Right-af-way Transfer - Neil KerstonlCruy Driskell (10 minutrs)
9. Appleway Signage - Cmy DriskelUMarina Sukup (20 minutts)
TO'i'AL .ti1LtilTI'ES: 135 minutes
5eutemiber 21. 2005. S:W a.m. Special Mcetin$: Ezecntive Sesaion to Discnas Labor Ncgotittdons
September 27. 2005. Rcealar M1iectine. 6:00 a.uz. (due date T6ursday. Septrmbcr ISj
1. PUIiLIC 14EAl2.[NG: Budget 2006 115 minutes]
2. PUBLIC HEARING: Ordinunce 05-025, Eiteasion af I)R-1 Zoning 113 minutea)
3. Consent Agrndn: Minutes, Claims. PAyro11 [5 minutes]
4. First Reading: Properry Tax Ordinance - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
5. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting I'owers af Initietivc & Rcfcrendum - Cary DriskelJ [ l5 minutes]
6. Mation Cunsideration: CenterPlacc Fibcr vs. T 1 far Communications and Data - Mike Jacksen [ 10 minutesj
7. Motion Cansideradon: Convibutions to Outaide Agencies - Ken Thompsan [15 minutes]
8. Spokane County Conuect Approvai Nina Regor ,Morgan Koudetka [20 minutes]
9. Administrativc Rcport:
u. Strect Dedicatiun Ordinancc I?raR - Neil Kersten [ 10 minutesJ
b. Cummuniration lnfraswctute Ad Hoc Gommittea Diana Wilhite [ t 5 minutes]
1 U. lnformution Onlv:
a. Departmcntal Munttily Rcports;
b. Planning Commission Minutes [estimated nleeting: 115 minutc,," ]
Drait .1dxunce Agrnda 9lIf2005 R 05 A\4 Pa;:r 1,44
Tiuursckk,• &plcmb r2Q 2005 Trnlullve: Jutnt Cuu►rcil,-13uurJ oj C'ounq C:umnusstvnrr
7'entatne Topicx Inrlruie: Cinv'Counn, ,11ode1 Agreenrenls ("me tao " clause):
Rtvfsing Rocul:lluintenance Contrucl /rlrnwn hi, 515 nrrl(i, ,
Trcm,cpartutian Infrastructure !1'ee&
Interlora! rtgreenrent Re Joinr '
.IpplNwcrti, Right-nf-K•w Trans.; .
October d. 2005, Study Session. 6:00 p.m. ldut: date 7 hur,d:o. -scp;tr!, i:_ r_ L
1. Presentation of Comrrehensive Plan, Planninb CommissiUn Recommended Draft -Uavr Crosb~
Octubcr 11. 2005, Reeular \7eetine, 6:00 n.m. (duc detc Thursday. Septcniber ~
i. PUBLIC IiEA121rG: Final Budget I lcz►ring [10 minutr-
1" Pubtie Nruripg on tlie C'omprehe,rsive Plcm Plcarrling Commfssian Recommended Draft [60 minute
3. Consent Agendo: 1*linutes, Claims, PayTUll [5 minutes;
4. First Rcnding E'roposed Street Dedication ()rciinancc -,ieil Kersten [10 minute,
5. Administrntive Rcpurt:
a. SF,PA Mitigation Stmtegies - Cary DriskelVGreg McCormick/Neil Kersien [30 minute-
b. Financial Management Policies - Ken "I'homPson [10 minutc
(estunated mrctine: 125 minute,' I
llct(lhur I'.'_Ilil;, f'1jn% vr,atinn ti% ith thi• ('vqiimutiit.. f'~•ntc•r('lari•. Ritnni I lJ. 6-uii ii.m.
()ctuhk:r lS 21105. spccial t'nunril Mcruno 0:l10 p.rn. [dur ctatc• 1 hur.ciay, t)ctubcr 0j
1. 2" Public fieuring an the Con:prclteiuive Plan Planaing Commission Xeromm4•yrdec! Draft [90
2. Coasent Agenda: Minutes, Claims, Payroll [5 minutes]
3. Second reading of property tax ordinnnce - Ken Thompson [ 10 minutt: , i
•3. Second Reading Pmpased Ordinunce Adopting Initiative & Rcfercndum Pawars -Cary UriskeU (15 minuic
i. Fint reading of ordinance adopting budget - Ken lliompson [10 minute-, ~
6. Fee Resolutiun adoptcd - Kcn Tiwmpson [10 Fr,MUC: .I
Uctober 25. Z(1l)5t Itegulur Meeting. b:IIU n.m. Idue date l'hunida~. October 131
l. Consent Ageada (5 minut<<I
2. Continuatiun of lad Public tiearing on the C'omprehetesive Plan t'lunnirrg C'arunis.sinn kecvmmended
(if neccssary), and begin Gduncil dcliberation [ I10 minuu- .
3. Adminisvndve Reports: a. Financial Management Policics - Ken Tliompson [l0 min, 7,_
4. infarmntion Cfily: a. Deparnncnta) Monthlv Eieports; b. Plannine Comrnission Minutes
[estimntcd mccting: 135 minute,
November 1. 2005. Study Sessiun. 6:00 n.m. Idue date Tbursda}, October 201
1. Cauncil deliheration on the C:omprehrnsive Plan PlannirrgCommissron Recommended Drc~'t (120 minute:s)
2. Stormwater N7FUiun1 Disc:ussiun - Joitn I lottman (20 minutcs)
TOTAL.'NINtiTES: 1:10 minutes
Novembcr 15, 2005, Sperial. Nceular MeetinI!. 6:00 p.rn. Idue date Thur.tdxy. Uctober 271
1. PUE3LIC IiEARI\G: (tenuuive if Cauncil considers subst.uiei-c ctianges w the f'lanrung Conun. Recommended draft) 120 minj
2 PUBI_IC HEAI2LtiG: Parks & Rrcreadon Master Plan - 1-Ilke Jacksan 120 miaut~~s)
3. Cansent Agenda: Minutes. Claims, PayruU [5 minutes]
.1. Socond reading ordinnnce adopting budget - Ken Iliompson [10 minutes]
Second Reading Proposod SU^ect Dedication Draft 4rdinance - Neil Ketsien [10 minutes]
F, Motion Consideration: Adaption of the Spokwre Valley Campreheirstve Plan [20 minutes ]
Motion Consideration: Adoption of P:irks & Rccrration M:is#cr Plan - Mikc Jacksun [5 minulrs]
(estlmated mceiing: 70-90 minutes")
No%-ember 22. 2005 - \0 1Teetinii
Novcmbcr 29. Z005, ReQular Mcetins! 6:00 n.tn. (due date Thursduy, November 171
1_ Consent Agenda: Minutes, Clairns, Par•mll (5 minutes)
T'raffic and Spced Limits Discussinn - Neil Kersten (ZO minutrs)
3. Departmentel Monthly Reports; b. Planning Comavssion ylinutes
(estImated meeting:` minutes")
December 6. 2005, Studv Sessioa, 6:00 p.m. (due date V4ednesday, Novembcr :31
i. PrismlPlus(Pada! (Parccl Datn Locator) 5ystcm - Clvis Berg (20 minutes )
I lelmct I'sc Educ3tion Discus5ion - Chris Rninbridve (20 minutcs )
December 13,2005, ReQUlur 1►teeting. 6:00 n.m. [duc date Thursday, December 1~
1. Consent Agenda: Minutes. Claims, Paymll
2. llepartmcntal N4andilv Reports
December 20, 2005, Studv Sessiun. 6:00 p.m. (due date "!'bursday, llccrmber 81
Ucrcmbcr 27,2005. Nu Mrctine
JunuArv 3. 2006, 5tudv Seasian.6:0(1 n•m. [duc d►ite Thursduy. December :21
Jununry 10. 2006t Rceulur iVlcetine, 6:00 ip.m. (due dute'I1ursday, December 291
1. Consent Afienda: Niinutes, Clairns, Payroll
2. Llei.tiL,n uf Ofliccrs: tt~i%Lir. Ucput} N1~I}ur hri,,Biinhrid,*e minutcti~
I)raft ALlvanct :1genda ~orl,_il(0 S.lrS ;1\1 PuL!c 3 ol 4
O'1"IiL•'K YENI)[NG AtiDi()R Ul'COM1IIVG ISSiTSA1EET'1hG5:
tiaturdaN, Fchruarv 11, "OOFi - tk'inter Retnst
AF'P 0?-{li - ( ar~y [ z-is.Cll
f3us Benc};., -
Ad NoC SiL~n l timmittc.,
Harnrd MitiLaliun Plai] - N•tarina Su'r,.up
Hotcl!'1lotel Grant Proposals fur 20osa
Central VUlley Schoo) District Impact t ee ftequ~:
Joint tiTeclings: Schoul Districts; Board of Count} cl~~n;;n,;,~or•~rti
Panhandling - Cal Wulker
Second Rcading Proposed Sidewallc Ordinance 04-0 ! 2- (fins rezadin;~ 1-1-2-24 -11-11
Scwer Collection Svstems - Neil Kersten
Starage Tank Urdinancc - Tam Scholtens
Stmet f':►vinw Funding Option -Neil Kersteii 1C►un ticfiinuricl5I
2StI[ilal£d fI7CCflf1t, I1tI1C dt?l's [IOl lt]Cllll{e time for puhlic ~UrT1fTlt:llyj
1'!