2008, 10-07 Study Session
AGEVDA
CI'i-l' OF SPUKANE VALLF,Y
CI'I'Y COti1iCIL VIVORKSILEET
S7UDY SFSSIOh
Tuesdsy, Uctober 7, 2a0$ 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COLTNCTt, CHA11iHERS
11707 F.ast Sprague Avenue. Ftrat Floor
(Pleax SUence 1'our CcU P6aaea Duriag the Aiecting)
DISCUSSION 1..F.ADER SLB.TF.CT/ACTIYITI' GOAL
1. Mark Pctcrs lnternationnl Tmdc Alliance Sisttr City Froposal DiscussianMfonuation
2. Csry DriskclLiJim Dledsoc Community Rc-Liun+ing Discusaion/Infarmatior,
3. Christina Janssen l3niform Devetopment Codc Discussion/information
Betch Code Proposed Amendmcrits
a. Inga NatclNcil Kcrstcn Shnnnan Avenuc I'arlcing I7iscussiauMformation
5. Cary DriskaU Appec►) Arocedures Discussian/InformatiQn
6. hen Tttompson 1=rc Rcsolution Proposed Changrs Discus►sionJlnfQrmntion
7. Mikc Swnr S%virnming Pool l'piate DiscuSSion/informetian
8. Mikc Jackson Geaernl Budget Discussion DiscussianMforctsatirr,
9. Ma}ror Munsc.m Rcginnnl Trnttspariatian Projcccs Uixussion/Informstioc3
Lcgisiative Agenda
10. Mayot Muoson Advance Aganda Disc us.5ion~ infomiation
11. Lrfvryr.ntian Chtfy (w111 itol be presenled or discu•rcd1:
u. Arganre7tinac Intcrsertion
h. Senfor Certles Demotttion 13id A H urcl
c. InlPrlrlm Emergenc), Cod,.~ Ordinance Amend»1vit
12. Muvor Ntunsun Ceuncil Check-in D1SC115SIOIL/IllI(}iII13L1Ctii1
13. Qavc McrLitr City Managcr Conuneiits Disti:ussion,"Infc►tmatiun
14. EXECUTIYE 5ESSION: L.end Acquisiticsn
ADJOURh
Notc. llelew Mherwise noitd pbove, thrre will De ao poDllc coaameAU a! CouneU Study SesslonL Howecer, Council aMays cnerres
the rigbt to reqnest lnformitioo frnm t6e pabUc and ttaRas approprfata Uuring er.attngs txld by dse City of SpDknns Vallcy Couutif.
chc Couacll rssma ttu rfght w tnk,e "uctlan" on aay itcm listed ar subsequcntly odded w the agradL Ibe tcrm "netinn" cne=to deEt'baatc.
discuis, review, caaslda. evaluatc, ar mako a collxtive positive or ocgative dreisia2►_
NtJT1C'E In3t.iduah pisnnmg m.acnd Qx mceung w+An mquine qecW autvm= a•crommodare phfvu1, barin6 er cnher iuT.irn,emk pteae ooabel
the Cltr Chrk q(S09} 921-10(1U as wan as pos.gfile 9o dw ersngematts Tm.• be mmic
ti:ik9ti ti«:ur. Ag=r,,'A. ()t:4cr 7.:008 YIV 1 c,; l
1. Executive Summary
Spokane, WA- based lnternatinnal Trade Alliancc (ITA) is a public-private partnership - a 501 c
(6) corporation, whose mission is to facilitate international busincss development and provide
international lesdership in the inland Northwcst. For the last twelve years the ITA has operatrd
with support from the State of Washington, the County of Spokane, and several city
municipalitie.S in the area. "I'he organization is also supported by the region's business
cammuniry through fee for service programs, membership and sponsorship of events. 'Ihis
unique public private partnership provides the management the structure necessary for advancing
the goals of the Asia Pacific Partnership for Clean I3evelopment and Climate through thc
international Sister CitN• nctwork.
'the communities in the Spokane arca have elccted ncw• lcadzrs «•ho havc, a strong commitment
to envimnmcntal stewardship, clean development, and adciressing climate chnnge at the local
level. Thcse leaders undcrstand the need to address issucs now so that the community wiU he
sustainablc and livable in the futum.
The International Trede Alliance, in partncrship with the Sister CiUes Assuciation af Spnkane is
developing a program that will serve as the prototype on the municipal approach to climate
change. Other local community organimions, both public and private w711 be critical partners in
this vcnturc.
Spc)kane's Sister City, progRam cunenllv has established relntionships «ith cities in lapan, China,
Ireland, und Korea. These relationships will serve as the foundation for dcvcloping municipal
rxchanges on twth a peer-to-peer level and a commercial level.
Under the leadership of the Intematianal Trade Alliance, and in parviership with the City of
Spo{cane, stcrrounding communities, and the Sister Cities Association of Spokane, the pmgram
will conncct like-minded leaders, cducators and entrepreneurs from the Inland Northwest and
Asia. The Intemational Trade Alliance will organize and facilitate peer-io-peer exchanges and
business development missions for communil}• stnl:eholders.
Participanta will:
1) Share best practices in muniCipal planning aad development
2) Promote training programs for green collar jobs
3) Expand busiaess relatiQnships relating to clean technology
7-hese exchanges will fvster the development and deployment af clcaner, morc efiiciem
technologics. The outcome w7ll be sustainable communitics thnt are utilizing the world's best
ideas for positive climate impact.
I !
r
History
The Asia-Paciflc Partnership on Clean Development and Climate brings together seven major Asia-Paclflc
countries - AustraNa, Canada, China, India,lapan, Korea, and the Unlted States -that collectively account for
more than half of the world's econamy, populatlon, and energy use. The partners are cooperating in an effort
ta address increased energy needs and the associated tssues of alr pollution, energy security, and ciimate
change. An innovative pubHc-private sector effort, the Asia•Pacific Partner5hip was established to achieve these
objectives In ways that promote etonomit development, reduce poverty, and accelerate the development and
deployment of cleaner, more efficient technologies.
The Partnersh(p bulids on the foundation of exlsting bilateral and multilateral inltlatives, and is consistent with
and contributes to Partners' efforts under the United Natfons Framework Convention on Climate Change, and
complement but does not replace the Kyoto Protocol
Scope
The Partnership has identified eight public-private Task Forces to develop and implemeni Action Pians. The Task
Forces address flve enetgy-Intensive sectors - aluminum, buildings and appliances, cement, coal mining, and
steel - as well as three energy supply sectors - cleaner fossil energy, renewable energy and distributed
generation, and pawer generatfon and transmission
Partnership Activities
The Partnership has agreed upon a Work Plan, setting out an Innovative approach of using government-lndustry
Task Forces to develop sustafnabfe solutions to our shared challenges through bottom-up prectlcal actfon. The
work of the Asla-Paciffc Partnershlp comprises a wide range of activities. The Inftia) portfollo of Partnershlp
projects Is weighted toward activitles such as sectoral assessments, capacity building, best practice
identlfication, and technology research and demonstratfon,
A few examples af Partnershlp work Intlude:
• Managing bauxite reside in aluminum production;
• Cooperating to standardfze energy efficient Ilghting;
• Transforming waste to fuel In cement kilns;
• Improving tarbon tapturp tethnology for coal•fired power plants;
• Developing coal mining health and safery strategies;
• Sharing best practites 1n power generation;
• Promoting wlar power deployment; and
• Increasing usage of cleaner steel technofogies
Organlzational Strudure
The Polity and implementation Committee was formed to aversee the Partnership as a whole, guide the eight
Task Forces, and periodfcally review their work. The Administrathre Support Group, currently hosted by the
United States, prrrvides 5upport to the PIC and the Partnership more broadly whi{e also coordinating Partnershfp
communicatlons and activities. Task Forces are led by Chairs and Co-Chairs, who oversee the publlc-private
sedor collaboration in working toward Partnership obJectives specific to their Task Force.
Task Forces
Aluminum Tosk Force
Asia-Pacific Partnership members atcount for approximately 5295 of the worid's aluminum production. Partners
can work to make further improvements In environmental performance, while reducing costs, through best
pracElce use of existing equipment (in particular perfluorocarbons (PFC) emisslons management), Increased
uptake of best available and affordable technology (Including improved (nstrumentation), the contlnued
development and deployment af new technologies, and by Increasing levels of recycling.
Build+nus ontlAp,pliarrtes Tvsk Force
Since the members of the Asla-Pacifit Partnership represent a majority of the warld's manufacturing capaciry for
a diverse range of appJlances, the Partnership has the patential to dr(ve significant regional and global
Improvements In energy efficiency In this sector. Partners have a soUd history of cooperation on energy
efficiency for buildfngs and appliances and have afready taken a range of bflateral and other collaborative
actfons in this area. The Partners are now focusing on opportunities in three areas related to applfances
(harmonizing test procedures for energy-using appliances and equlpment, reducing the use of standby power,
and market transformation) and eight related to buildings (certiflcat[on, improvements to extsting bufldings,
codes, high-perfarmance design, utlHty regulatlan and incentives, "smart" systems, green leasing, and
financing).
Cement Tosk Force
The APP Panners account for 629b of global cement production. The Cement Task Force's work wlll seek to
facilltate the uptake of best available technology and envlronmenbl management systems In Partner countrfes,
and will assist In the provislon of expert advlce In relation to the opportuntties to reduce greenhouse gas and
other emissfons levels through the introduction of exlsting and emerging technologies and the identification of
other key opportunlties.
Cleaner Fossil EneroY Tosk Force
In aggregate, Partner counirles account for 5496 of global carbon dloxide emissions trom fossil fuel consumption.
The Task Force is actively warking to share best practices, eHmfnate market barrlers to the deployment of
technologies that can signiflcantly reduce greenhouse gas emisslon levels, air-home pollutants and other
environrnental Impacts, and Increase the utilization and efflciency of cleaner fossil energy. To this end, the Task
Force has identified five thematic areas of focus whlch are CO= storage, post combustion capture, oxy-firing and
other advances technologies, coal gasiflcation, energy market for gas, and gas handling improvements.
Cua! ryl;nrna Tus6; (orce
Five Partner countries accounted for 6596 of total worid coal production. The Coal Mining Task Force Is working
to improve coal min(ng and beneflciatlon efficiency, reduce coal's environmental impacts, and improve coal
mining's safety retord. This includes promoting best avaliabte technologies and practlces fn coal preparation,
coal mine methane capture, and improved mine health and safety. The Coal Mining Task Force will work
collaboratively with the Cleaner Fossil Energy Task Force to ensure that synergies are captured in improving coal
processing and developing new coal-based generation technologles.
Power GeneraGon ond Trpnsmfsslon Task Fo~ce
The seven Partner countries produce approximately 5496 of the world's etectricity, Improvement In power
generation and transmission effitlency in Partners thus has the potential to reduce the emissions of mlllions of
tons of C% and pollutants. The Power Generatlon and Transmission Task Force i5 working ta fdentlfy and
implement the best practlces for pawer generation, transmission and distribution, and demand side
management. The Task Force is also working to promote informatlon sharing to Sacllitate collaboration between
Partner countries In order to increase understandfng of key issues facing each partner countr}rs power sector.
Renewable Enerav and Dfstrlbuied Generailon Tosk F e
The seven Partner countries account for 39% of global renewable energy electric power generation. The Task
Force Is working to promote renewabte energy techno{ogles, such as hydro, solar, geothermal and wind. The
three key 8reas the TaSk ForCe wlll fotus on are deployment of renewable energy and distributed generation
technologies, marfcet-enabling proJects to accelerate the uptake of renewable energy and distrlbuted
generation, and research development and demonstration projeds to help close the remaining cast gap for key
technotogies and produce salutions to technlcal challenges.
SteeJ Task Force
Asia-Pacific Partners account for more than 6096 of global steel praduction, and production is expected to
increase. The aggregate amount of C02 emitted from the global steel Industry has reached roughly two bfllion
ton5 annually. Therefore, the Steel Task Force has significant potentia( to address CO2 emissions and conserve
energy by sharing Information an clean technologies and by cooperating to Implement such technolog(es. 'Che
goal of the Steel Task Force will be to facilitate the uptake of best avallable technology, practices and
environmerttal management systems In Partner countries together with fncreased retycling. Action wlll focus
around securing Improved benchmarking and reporting, energy and material efficiencies, and technology
development and deployment.
International
Trade Alliance
~ ITA Budset YTD Compsrison - - 2008 96 Inaease or Deuease I
IQFunding Scurces
a.n• I ~ 1 • -
~.b
a n.. ~ f
i
0.6 ~
~
O.t " - - -
/
c'
c - - - o -
•NRfFI ' ItREF! ■OREFI
I - -
Performance Measures
Nieasure Firnlannfion GvaWGommeats
• The dolla nmount of transnctiam
interuatioasl Sales by . me numb~r of intcrnada~nal transactiocu lT'A has ' Spukarx oounry In 20U~ will rcnch nearl}~ S1 blillan
Spdcane C'ompanla influenoed in cacpocts. a 56% Inmcass over 2005. (Not yct
offidal.)
cveane Gesented Dp - Pa=mW of funding frnm private souroes . 34'~fi of lTA'a budget ~w is ckrived fram prlvatt
I~A P ~ • tnoome ~am eveata and businesa dcr~lopmrnt aupport, up fmm 129'o in 2007
miesioas
i •Revrnue fram otieat aaasuiting srn•Ixs
~ Number of New to • CompanIes we havc helped rnter the intematioael .
Ezport Campaaies markeiPtam
• Number of new markets we rrtuke acoeuibie fur
clirnts
Glisat Satisfictioa o[ • CNv11 SoLisfactian by dietus af ITA's delivay of •
1TA Sen3ces ooroultadm cvents, dc actitiitits
'l'ndt l.taderstip . Abillty W oonttuct acui del'tvet the Tf A EP1 •
• Mafia tnrndans oCimcrostional tradc from loral
annmunity
• Nwmbcr ot 1TA mcmbers
Further Highlights
• iTA li devdopmg a propesal to he ttreded by the US. State 6epartmcnt ta the amount olf250,000 wcr two qents fur drvdop rclaqoashipswith
Spalc.iae dster dty pamers for the atpandon of sala aad shacfng of technology aad pollry uotmd dean devde:pmmt and trchonotgie: to teduce
emmfsstnas and lmprove merV dfedmry.
• ITA letd s oade thow ddeptlon to the Sdmonton OQ Sands shnw September 23•15 and genented numwus trade leads for partidpatlng
compsaies.
" TTA wHl ilso be {eadlq a trade dsow ddegrtlna to the European Wtnd F]nergy Coafermce ta March af 2009.
76 e ITA consultlog pUot pruied ts weU utidemesy wtth at lust 7 proJeai uadenray .
• The InitW results from the Kim Hotttart caasWNns project tras `eaented a 5100,OOU distaotor agreemrni
~..uca lu~ct~ta►wu.si 1'age 1 of 1
~ r.
A GLOBAL CITIZEN
DIPLOMACY NETWORK
_ I
MEMBEiiS ONIY Sister Citlas International Misslon Siatement k 6osls
LOGIN
Mbsion Statemont
SISTER ClTY Promote peace tiMrough mutual respect, understandmg, 6 cooperatlon - one IndlvMual,
one community at e timc
UJfiECTORY
JOIN NOWI Goals
CI7IE5 SEEKING
CITiE$ SKter Gties lnterr►enonal Is a nonprofK ciUten diObrnacy necwork Nat creetrs and
•trenQthens pirtntrshlps hetv.etn U.S. and IrttemKional communltles. We sirive to Dvild
PROGRAMS & Olobal caa0erstwn et me munrdpal lerel, prpr►oUe wlturoi unueratartdinQ and sdmulate
SERVICES em^a^k devebpmenL
AfVNUAt Slsder Gn@s Intetnatlonal !s a Ieader Npr 1vC3{ CwflrpunKY dQVtbpmtnt and vOtuntecr
CONFERENCE actbn. we mottvate and empower prlvate cltuena, munkipel ofrictsh and pualness
IeeAen to conduct lonp•term ststor cltr prvprsms We Detieve that sbttr clty proqrams
TOOLK[TS & Involre two-wer communkaUon and rhoul4 mvwally benertt parmcrlny cammunlGa
GUIDES
DISCUSSION USTS Our yoals ere to:
MARKETPLACE 9 DeVWpp munlcipal partnerships between U.S. cities, counties, and
UUNATE statc:s and simnar Jurisdlctiorts in other natlons.
<.BOUT US •~~ide opportunEtieS for dty oficials and citizens to experfence
and explore othtr cultures throuflh bng-term community
partnershlps.
• Cnata an atmasphiPre in whlch economic and community
development can be lmplemented and svengthcned.
• Stimulats environments through whith communlties wlll creatively
lebrn, work, and solve problems together ttirouQh redprotni
cultural, educational, munlcipal, business, professional and
technlcal exchanges and projects.
• CoHa6oraGe with organizations In the United States and other
cauntnes whlch share simi{ar gaais.
WJME I CONIAC` US I SEA0.(,}i I SSTE MAA I ARIhTER ifL'ENDLY vEWSEON
WE85J7'E DOWEQED BY INA11'.AM, INC.
t SLTFR CITIES INTFRNATIWvII, 2001•1D07 ALL alGHTS 0.[SERvED.
http://WWW.Sister-cities.org/sci/aboutsci/mission 1 O/2l2008
va~~~i wuv-~ iuwiuauVU~l YBgC 1 OI S
(1 '
i;r f
~
A GLOBAL CfTIZEN %
DIPLOMACY NETWORK . ~ _ ° .
MEMBERS ONLY Sister Gties International Statistics
LOGIN
Slster Cities Internativnai Aas grown Immensety in the past 50 years.
• and will cantinue to qrow In [he future!
SISYER CITY Here are same Interesting statistics about Slster Cides intematinnal:
DI RECfORY
]oIN NON1! • Represents communities in all 50 states in the United States and
CITIES SEEKING the District of Columbia and five United States territories.
CITIE5 . Represents communitles in Africa, Latin AmeriCa, Asia/Oceania, ttte
PROGRAMS & Caribbean, Eurasia, Europc, the Middle East and Canada.
SERVICE5 . Represents 694 communities in the United States wich 1,992
ANNUAL partnerships.
CONFERENCE .
7QOLKITS & • Represents 1,749 interna[ional communiNes In 134 countrles.
GuraEs
ADout our member6:
~ DISCUSSION I.LSTS
MARKETPLACE • Among U.S. states, California has the most sister city programs
DoNATE with 122 communities and 388 partnerships.
ABDUT US • Among communicies abroad, )apan has the most slster city
. programs with 228 communities and 239 partnerships.
. The U.S. communfty with the most relationshlps Is a tle between
Chlcago, IL and Oakland, CA, with 25 sister clNes each. -
. The srriallest U.S. community ever recognized by Sister Cities
Internatlonal i5 Gilbert, Arkansas, with a population oF 33. Gilbert
paired as a sister city with Bride on the Isle of Man in 2005.
• Europe has 35.5% of all sister city relationships witfi the United
States.
, , i o.,.~..._ i .,....Q,......Q.......,_ ~o.
WEBSTTE POWERED BY 1MALGAM, II`FC.
0 5157ER CfiTIFS 1NTE0.NATIONAL, 2001-2007. ALL R7GMTS F£SEFvEQ.
http;l/vvww.sister-cities.orglStatistacs/iudex 10/212008
Uw.c~ ~.~ucs au~cruauw~tu Page 2 Of. 3
Pe►c+ontap2 a1 Cardrles byArea
291 3d 2 • 6Ut Opo
81b ■ Asi a(Ocaarra . .
Q L:! In /~m or iom
fllf 3s18
■ Atrica -
74% • [yfldCle fssl
B Caribbeai
o Co»9'i
A membershln SurvEy thet was dlstrlbu[ed in 2005 revealed
many inberesting facts about our mernbers.
Hiqhllyhts af the membe►Bhip burvcr are;
. Sister city programs happen in smaN towns, blg clNes, and all sizes
in between. Sister City programs vary In pvpulation size.
CamTa+utv~aptoionaYV-eru8e
• twPoo 3mpoo
~ ~ ■ 60,~0 e 7 f~,m0
896
2096 0 26,000 - 50,OOD
6
D 10,Od0 2J,=
696 0 Mar2 tha► 1,000
1096 Poo - =)PW
.
1$96 ■ SDOp00 1 Q17DOD ,
11 % 0 B,OM • • 1o pno -
> . Lega t ne, a,aan 8 oa.e knoW
. We are a grassroots and autonomous movement, with control of
slster city relakionship5 resting at the (ocal levcl. MoSt 5ister city
programs are organized with a formally incorporated nonprofit
ci[izens organization.
• Sister city relatioiishfps are building economic ties for communitie5.
Seventy pEr cent of the membership surveyed estirnated that thelr
sister city program helped "generate tourism and trade for
economic Gevelopment to a great extent" in thelr community.
. More than one-third of the sister city organizations surveyed ~
recelve funding from local government to help their sister city I
program.
. According to our members, the top ten most important membership
servlces provided by Sister Citfes lntemationa► are:
o Webslte (www.slster-caties.org)
o Sister Citles lnternational administered grants
o Annual Conference
o Informational and "How to° guides
o Customer servfces (e-mail or phone consuttation)
o Quarteny Newsletters
o Assistance with finding a sister city
. `
o e-newsletter ,
http://www.sister-cities.org/Statisticslindex . ~
l 0/2/2008
UlAl4t 1...1liGJl111G311t1UV1Li~l Page 1 of2
)
K
. . . i .
Q A GLOBAL CITIZEN ~
DIPLQMACY NETWORK
.
;
MEMBERS ONLY Current PartnCrS
LOGIN 5ister Clties lnternational partner5 with U.S. and intematinnal orpanizaUons, munkipel
- associations, and corporation*, in a variety of ways to enhance Citlzen dlplemacy around
[he woAd.
SIS7ER CI1'Y
b1RECTORY PaKner Oryanizstlons
JOIN fVOW! Academy for Educa[ional Developrnent www.aed.org
CIrIES SEEKING he Africa Channel www.theafricachannel.com
CI7IES Alliance for Intematinnal Educatlonal and www.alliance-excnange.org
PROGRAMS & Cultural Exchange
SEitVICES AYUSA Internationai www.ayusa.org
ANNUAL gureau of Educational and Cultural Affalrs, U.S. http://exchangesstate.gov
De artment of State
CONFERENCE Coalition for American Leadershi Abroad www.colead,or~
700LKY7S & Coalltion for Citizen DiDloma www.citizen di lomacy.org
GUIDES iEARN USA www.us.ieat"tl.org
DISCUSSION L15'i"5 lnterna[ional Mayor Communication Centre, wwev_hk-imcc.com
MARKETPLACE LZ'b. (IMCC
DONATE Safari Ventures www.safarivenkures.com
ABOUT US he Se tember Concert www.septemberconcert.or
• US Mexica Sister Cities Association www.usmsca.org
Foun4atlon www.wheelchairfoundation_org
International and Natloftel Munidpal A&sotliltlons
Assoclatlon of Mexican Municipalities www.ammac.or .mx .
he Australian Sister Cltles Association www.esca.asn.au Cites Unies France www.cites-unfes-france.org
lntemational City/County Management www.icma.org
Assoclatlon
Korea Local Government http://www.klafir.or.kr/newyork/
Center
Local Government IntEmational Bureau UK www.lgib.gov.uk
Munlcipal Association of R1o Grande do Sul, ~vw+v.famurs.com.br
Brasil
National Associatlon of Coun[ies wwtiv,naco.org
Nadonal Lea ue of CINeS www.nlc.org
Socie of Local Authar' Chief Executives www.solace.org.uk
Standing Conference of Towns and www.skgoj.org/english
Municf alftle5 of Yuqo5lavia
_ Unlon of Local Authorltles in Israel www.ulai.org.ll
~Union of Russian Cltles www.urc.ru
http;/fwww. sister-cities.orA/scilpartners/sponsorslcwrent-nartners 1012/2008
,.......,a...,,jt, , Page 2 of 2
UniteC Statet ConFerence of Ma ors www.usma ors.vr , .
. State Municipal uea
Arkansas Munitlpal League www.arml.org
~ Florida League of Cities www,Flcides.com
Kentuck Lea ue of Cities www.klc.o
Michi an Munlci al Leaque www.mml.or
~
New Mexito Municipal League www.nmml.or
phio Municipal League www.omunileague.org
Pennsylvania League of Cities and ,,yww.plcm.org
MuniCl allties
AddlNonal Orpanizatlons
Close-Up FounGatlon www.closeup.org
Peo le 7o People International www.PtEi.org
UN Habitat www.unhabitat.org
World Bank Institute www.wortdbank.org
NOME 'CONfACT lJ5 I SEARCH E SM hEqP I PRIN7ER FRIENDLY VERSTON
VdEBSITE POWFApp 6Y rMAt,GAM, INC.
p SlSTER G1"1E$ IN7'ERNATIONAL, 2001-2007. ALI. RlGHTS fiESERVEP.
http:!/www.sister-cities.org/sci/partners/spoosors/curcent-partners 10/2/2008
~CITY OF SPOKAIVE 11ALLEIf
Request for Council Action
Mee#ing Date: Oc#ober T, 2008 City Manager Sign-off: ~
1tem: C rieck all that a ppiy : ❑ canserit ❑ a1d business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing -
0 infnrmation E 2dmin_ report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITL.E- 2008 Communi#y Relicensing Prograrro update; 2009 grarrt applica#ion_
GOVERNING LEGISLATION, RCW 10,101 .
PRElflOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEIJ: Authorized sta#f #o app1y for 2008 grant f~nds to
parkner with the City of Spokane and Spokane Caun#y to implement the Community Relicensing
Pragram.
BACF{GROUND: The cwties of Spokane and Spokane 1lalley received a joint grant of $75,400
frorn #he state Office of Public Defense (OPD) ta be used in the combined pragram. Since we
re ceive our public defender services via conkra ct; we worlced wi#h Spolcane County on how they
would irnplement some portian or contribution to the program operated by the City of Spokane.
The resul# of that implementation is that Spakane County hired a limited terrn position ta review
0 ca ses and defenda nts at the County Public De#ende r's Off ice to forward to the progra m. These
include cases from both Spolcane VaIley and Spakane County_ The general benefi# of the
program is a pretty substantial reduc#ion in the number of misdemeanor cases handled by the
office. The specific benefi# is that the ai#orneys and staff handling misdemeanor cases have
more tirne to devote to each of the cases they have since they dan't have to deal with neady as
many driving vuhile license suspended in the third degree cases. This allows for a higher quality
of representatian on the ot heT cases,
Spolcane anticipated starting the program in March, 2008, but was unable to get i# going far
funding reasons and because we had to negotiate an interlocal agreement, which tool[ until
May, 2008. Since that time, i# has been operating full tame. Jim Bledsoe, the Spokane
Prosecuting Attoeney, will presen# a PovverPaint presentation regarding the irnpac# of the
pTagram so far this year.
1t is also the time af year when the State OfFce of Public Defense accepts applications far the
following year_ One of the effects of starting the prograrrti jater then arrticipateci was that
personnel were not hired when expected. As such, tYrere may be unexpended grant funds at
the end of'the year. Kathy Knox, Spolcane Public Defender, has discussed this wi#ri OPD, which
advised that if this is the case, #o request a reduced arnaunt for 2009, and utGGze the
unexpended 2008 funds in the first part af 2009,
I hav,e attached the blank appliCation fOrm. S#aff is working with its counterparts at Spokane
and Spokane County to cornpkete the applicetion form for a jaint request again. Staff will .
req+jest a motion on the October 14, 2008 consent agenda ta seek authorization to apply for
2009 OPD grant funds_ (Pfease note th at ada'ition al t+rrre for CouncIl consrdera6orr of th is rr-ratter
was not possVe. Staff recefved tha notx!e September 2 9, orre day before these rrraterrals were
turneci in ta tha Cfty Clerk, Thare is onfy one rneetfng between wherr the application was
received ar+d the afeadlfrre for submfttrrrg it.)
The cities and County would also need to reprise their in#erlocal agreemeri# for 2009, which
shoulti not taks long since #he essential language has now been agreed to_ That could be dane in November or Decernber, 2008.
In the event OPD denies the grant applicatiarr, it is likel}r Spokane County or the Ci#y of 'I
Spakane rnay request that we continue to parkicipa#e in #he pragram with a contribution frorn the
City's general fund_
OPTIONS- AutYrorize staff to apply for 2009 Ofrfice of Public Defense grant funds; not authorize
staff to apply for said furatis.
RECOMMENDED #1CTIDN OR MOTION; Cansensus ta place a mo#ion on the October 14, -
2 008 consent a g e n d a to a uthorRZe sta#f to apply for 20 09 Office of Public Defe nse grant.
BLfDGETiFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Budget neutral for the City, STAFF CONTACT- Gary Driskell, Deputy City Attorrrey; Jim Bledsae, Spokane City Prosecukor.
ATTACHMENTS; 1. PawerPoint materials frarn Jim Bledsoe;
2. Application forrn for 2009 OPD grant; .
i
•
.
The Relicensing Project
The Relicensing Project
• What is it??.
-A Combined Spokane City/County Effort
- To Assist Suspended Drivers - Regain Their License and Insurance
- Pay Outstanding Fines
- Reduce Court and Jail Costs
- Improve the Safety of the Public
,
.
The Relicensing Project
- A Combined Spokane City/County Effort
• Operates From City Prosecutor's Office
• Administered by City Prosecutor
• Manned by Two County Employees
• Assisted by Spokane Valley Generated Grant
From the State Office of the Public Defense
• Also Staffed by Volunteers/VVork First Assistants
.
The Relicensing Project
- To Assist Suspended Drivers
• Drivers Suspended in The Third Degree Who
- Generally just owe money on fines
- Cannot Assist with:
» Accident Holds Child Support Holds
» Alcohol Holds
- Account for 1/3 of Municipal/District Court Criminal Dockets
- Amount To Untold Days of Incarceration
• Not Applicable to Second and First Degree
Suspensions
. .
i /
The Relicensing Project
- Regain Their License and Insurance
• Criminal History Scoring Results in 3 Possible
Tiers
- Tier One (Shortest History) Licensed in Days
- Tier Two 60 days
» Driving School
» Life Skills Classes
» Two iVlonths of Payments
- Tier Three 120 days
» Driving School
» Life Skills Classes
» Three Months of Payments
The Relicensing Project - Pay Outstanding Fines
• License Returned
• Payments Continue - License Retained
- Payments are at least $25 per court owed
- Made to a receivables company
- Can be made in person, via mail, over the phone
• NO DRIVI NG without insurance or termination
• Upon Payment in Full the Program Stops
/ 1 1 1
The Relicensing Project
- Reduce Court and Jail Costs
• 1/3 Of All Criminal Cases in Municipal/District
Court
- Dockets are jammed and time is money
- People who cannot afford any fines or penalties
» Typical Criminal Case is a criminal fine (-$250)
» Typical Criminal Case Includes the Trigger Infraction
Minimum of $124 (such as defective equipment)
» Typical Criminal Case Includes a No Insurance
Infraction of $550
» Easy to result in >$1000 in fines and penalties
- Failures to Appear = Warrants = Jail Time = Jail Bill
The Relicensing Project
- Improve the Safety of the Public
• Participants Must Not Drive Unless Licensed
• Participants Must Have Insurance or Be
Terminated I F They Drive
• All Tier 2 and Tier 3 Participants Have Graduated
From A Focused Driving School Course
• People With Licenses Get Better Jobs
- Able to Afford Better Cars
- Drive Conservatively to Keep Both
I
.
The Relicensing Project
• What is a Tier One - Two - Three
- Tier One 1-19 Points
- Tier Two 20-49 Points
- Tier Three 50+ Points
- Points are assigned based on the seriousness
of the history incident and its age with >5yrs
reducing the point count.
- Any Open DWLS 3= Automatic Tier Two
The Relicensing Project
• Who Does Not Qualify
- Serious Violent Offenders
• Center for Justice
- Second and First Degree Suspensions
Alcohol Holds
- Accident Holds
- Child Support Holds
- Terminated Participants - Judicial Waiver
~ ~ J/~'; ,
,
M ATRIX
.~..>.:r... ~r
€SGN:~,~~1!r~z~
~i~ ~i~l7i'.E-:r^r,"'~
BY SIGNING THIS FORR7, YOU ARE AGREEING NOT TO DR1VE UNLESS PROPERLY LICENSED AND INSURED. YOU WILL 8E TERMINATED
FROM THE ,RELlCENSlNG PROGRAPA !f YOU DRlVE WHILE YOU ARE NOT 1-lCENSED OR INSURED AFTER SlGNING TNlS FORM.
Tier Classiflcation Circle Ono '
1 to 19 Points Tief I
4. ~~:~,-r~r~t ' ~-~r .~~i~ .w• .
E~ria~i:~3~~~• _ „S70'6tR' '~~''C:.o:a~'n ~ . ~ _ ' t.. ~
. 20 to 49 Points Tier II
;TeldPhoRe~p..........'~~~~~ e~sa ' ' - v
~r~:t~c-~ ,~,`a~ i,~j,a~.~~xw ~ ~ ;r•, ~ „~,,,"+~x,~ 50+ Points Tier III
r'
Appl~c~n~dCkho~vledgest7~at~he or sfrerha~ ad aficf•un orstanh rnf,or, atio e~fle r ,se
a~on~N' i~nsk ~ e, y d
~ o tgK F i isip a` g~ a n tl c s p' o` c i f i c a l l yA g e 4~~T r r s At
that:k,:0qln~fpr~atl~r,e s•9",:tqlepl on~~„m
r bersr€~~~ tl~.3•~~~'~ rt n _~aqPa.~.. ; of L~consin~.is,cnUca~~`o~i eia~pf~ara,s s~r. cc4rei Total Points:
° t+.i s r r u7 t~{~j' ~FN~I~ y s ~ . 'lr _ P
~
' AI?PIEca~lhSlynaiur,a 1:'~.Ma~~~~~~!~~~.~~v.'~.,~€~.~a..'~rr~
~t't=a'v}~'~'~.~v ~~t'tr'~4.,.+a~;. H~°:~;'1 `-'',~-"'"~~~::~.•i%:T;::sL.::~L~.Y`u ~'."g`•~~..-~s`' ' .sAli3!'~'ss{~' s ~i~
Trafflc Offense # of OEfonscs < 5 Of(ense Polnts <S Totai Points <5 ~ of Offcnscs > 5 OHonso Points >5 Total Points <5 •Totai Offonso Points
In(mctions I mmillsolaw
oui 12 10
DUI (2 in last 5 yrs) 30
OWLS 1 . 10 . 8
DWLS 2 8 6 .
DWLS 3 3 2 -
I7WLS 3 Pending 30
Elud(ng 20 15
Hlt R Run AttendedIS 12
' Hit & Run 8 6
. Nagligent 1 10 8
idVOL 1 2 ~
R@Ckle55 10 8
~ Database ' ! / Ineligfble: DOL 5-360-902,3900 LS Class 1-509-325-6821 911 DS 1-509-324-0911
, . ------------.:r,_..~.~..._-
' IMPORTANT INFORMATION Administratfve Fee: Appibr2nks are required to pay a one-time nonrafundable administrativo fee oi prfor to being accepted into the
program. Thfs fee will be collected by the Spokane County ProseCUtor - Dlscovery Section, Public Safoty Building, 1104 W. R4allon. Discovery is opon
befween 9:00 am and 4:00 pm Monday through Friday, enjuclina holidays. . The fee must be paid in cash, cashier's cfieck or monev order made
, navable to Spokane Countv Prosecutar - CRP:'personal checks are not accep#ed. Checks from Washington State Agencies and Career Path'
_ Sorvices are accepted. This fae is ABSOLUTELY MONREFUNDABLE, reg3rdless of Indivfdual circumstances. II is an adminfstrative fee; it will nat
reduce the balance of yout flnes due. As such, oniv o2v the fee if Xou aro convinced• vou can completo the oraoram. Once you have paid the fee and
receivod a rocefpt, brina the receiat back to the Citv P__rc*_e_cujina Attornov s Offiice for admission to the program. '
Reinstatemont of Urivin_ Privilapas : YOU ARE ADVISED !hat af the cnd of the program tive tiviQ REQUEST the Court reinstate your drivfng privflege5
. and/ot grant certain other relief. We CANNOT GUARAN7EE the Court will reinstate your driving pr9vlleges or grant other relief.
' Onetime Proqram: This oroqraril i avallable only once ver aqplicaat. If y0u fall thc program, includfng defautUng on your time payment agreement.
eiihQr during ar after complotion of the formal program, ancilor boing cfted for failing to have liability insurance, a11 recalled fines will•be retumed to
collections and yovr licpnse vriil be resuspended. IF YOU I}0 NOT BELIEVE YOU CAN PviAKE M0NTHLY PAYA4ENTS IN THE MINIhAUM AhA0UN7
SEf FOR YOU FOR AT LEAST THE HEXT 36 A40NTWS, you should vrait until you are sure to entet the program.
, Coilections: Oojy Spokane Ciiy, Spokane Caunry, and aur partnors from surrounding jurisciictlons, tickets avill havo the interest and fees waived until
your successful completion oi the program. At that 8me tfie fees end fnterest wAI bc dismissed. These tiekefs cannot be recalled from colleations if youu
are in "Icgal" or'gamishrnent status" avith thc collection agency. All other jurisdictians are paid at collection apencies.
No Authorization to Drive: You mav not drnre until your driving privileges have boen reinstated by the Department of L(censing and you are properly
licansed and insured. If you ate caught driving prior to being propetty licensed and insured, you will be automaUcally and immedlately term(nated from
the program. THERE ARE NO EXCEP7`IONS.
[ J TIER I: As Tier I applicant, you will need to aocomplish the following prior to being accepted fnto the program and eligible for relicens(ng.:
1. Pay the nonrefundabte admErsistraltve fEto of and bring us the rece9pt.
2. Obtain a valid insurance quote and return it to us. You maywant to ask your agent abovt 6road form automobile liability coverage.
' 3. Obtafn.$ to pay the first month nayment(s), and be proparcd to make reaular montfily payment(s) in that amount.
TIER II: AS Tier II applicant, you avill need to accomplish the following prior to being accepted into the progr9m and eligible for rellcensing
1. Pay the nonrefundable admin(strative (ee a and bring us the receipi.
2. Obtain a valid insurance quote and reium it to us. You may w2nt to ask your agent about broad form automobile liabtliry coverage.
' 3.' Be ready to oommence making u ar monthly payment.s on yaur account totaling $ "
4. Make aII couil appearances on your pending DWLS 3, if any, unti) notifled tn writlng olherrtisa. Failing to appear causes a avarrant for your arrest. .
Once you havo completed these requlrements rre will have you sign some additional documenfs. We vrill then file a Notice of PartEcipatEon wlth the court
and commence your participation in the program. You will be assignad ono driving class and at least one Life Skills dass over 60 day. After you have
made your socand monthly payment and sixty days after the Notice of ParUcipatlon (s fled, wa wiU ask the Gourt #o approve a Completion Order, which
will allati+l yau to reinstate your driving privileges and dismiss your pending Drivfnfl License Suspended Third, ff any. •
TIER III: As Tier III appiicanL you witl need to accompiish the following prior to being aocepted info the program and eligiblo for rQlicensing
1. Pay the nonrefundablc administrative fee a and bring us the recelpt. •
• 2. Maka aII court appearances on your pendirig DWLS 3, If any, untQ notfiled in viriUng olhenviso. Failing to appoar causes a warrant far your arrest. .
3. Be reacfy to commence making regula monthly payments on your accavnt totaling $
Once you have paid the administrative fee, re.urn the rereipt to•us. We wifl fife a Notice of Participation with the oourt and oommence your participaUon . (n the pragram. You will be assigned one driving class and at least h+ra Life Skills class over 120 days. The Reinstatement Pian will cont2in a monthly t(me payment obligation(s) an your fine(s), and the classes you vrill be required to takQ and a requlrement for yau to obtain an insurance quote.
' Assuming you comply with each ot the Reinstatement Plan roquirements, at the end of 120 days we vdill ask the Cou[t to approve a Completion
Order, which will allow you to re+nsiate your driv[ng privileges and dfsmiss your pending Driving While License Suspended Third, if any.
,
\ J/ /
The Relicensing Project
• Success To Date 10. 1.08 (19 Weeks)
- Applicants - 1453
- Participants Eligible- 1007
• Tier 1 - 625
• Tier 2 - 271
• Tier 3 - 111
Terminations - 112
• Driving
• Nonpayment
- Graduates - 504 .
The Relicensing Project
• Spokane Valley Success To Date 10.1.08 (19
Weeks) - Applicants - 82
- Participants - 63 • Tier 1 - 44
• Tier 2 - 12
• Tier 3 - 7
- Terminations - 14
• Driving
• Nonpayment
- G rad uates - 29
,
,
~ ~CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-flff:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ netiv business ❑ public heanng
❑ information [ admin. report n pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Batch amendments to Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
as follows:
Section 19-A (Schedule of, Permitted Uses) to allow medicaUdental clinics to locate in the
Garden Office District.
Chapter 19.30 (Changes and Amendments) Remove item 7 which requires that there have
been substantial changes in an area since the adoption of the code.
Chapter 19.40.120 (Manufactured Housing) Update the required roof pitch to reflect what is
required by state law and add a provision which would allow the replacement of existing single
wide manufactured homes under certain circumstances.
Chapter 19.40.020 (Residential Standards) Update the matrix to allow for a reduced duplex lot
size, correct the lot arridth in the MF-1 zone so that it is correct mathematically, and update the
matrix to include information related to the setback of structures from a private driveway
C J easement.
Chapter 19.40.010 (General Provisions) Add a provision which would allow certain accessory
structures to encroach into the required setbacks and add requirements related to the
placement of outdoor lighting in residential areas.
Chapter 19.60.010(General Requirements) Add a provision which would allow certain accessory
structures to encroach into the required setbacks, and add a requirement for the screening of
refuse storage areas.
Chapter 19.70.010 (Light Industrial District) Add a provision which would allow certain
accessory structures to encroach into the required setbacks.
Chapter 19.70.020 (Heavy Industrial District) Add a provision which would allow certain
accessory structures to encroach into the required setbacks.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was L-dopted in September of 2007 and was
effective October 28h, 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were
discovered which were either incorrect, impractical, or omitted. These amendments are some
of the first of these items to be corrected.
ANALYSIS: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 17.80.150(6) provides approval criteria
that amendments of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code must meet. Those criteria include:
1. The proposed amendment(s) are consistent with the applicable provisions of the ~
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed amendment(s) bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,
welfare and protection of the environment,
Staff Comment: Staff constantly reviews and takes in comments regarding its Code
provisions in an effort to fix things that are incorrect, don't work as intended, were
omitted in error, and to remove those provisions that our experience shows us are
unnecessary. We have been accumulating a number of potential changes as they
relate to code compliance-related provisions, which are provided in the attachment.
SVi111C 17.80.150(F) states that the City may approv,!~ amendments to the UDC if it finds
that:
(1) the proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan; and
(2) the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the pubfic health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment.
LUG-1 requires code provisions that "preserve and protect the character of Spokane
Valley's residential neighborhoods. The requirement for setbacks from private driveway
easements provides a consistency in the appearance of physical structures from all
travel ways including driveways, private roads and public streets. The outdoor lighting
standard limits the amount of light and glare in residential areas.
LUG-3 envisions commercial areas as vital and attractive. Requiring refuse storage
areas to be screened works to accomplish this. Allowing limited accessory structures to
encroach into the required setbacks allows flexibility of design while still maintaining
separation between principal structures.
LUP-1.3 calls for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential
developments. Allowing limited accessory structures to encroach into required setbacks
allows a certain measure of flexibility while still proviciing adequate setbacks for principal
structures. ~
LUP-11.3 requires buffering, landscaping and other development standards for
industrial areas. Allowing a limited amount of encroachment into the required setbacks
would not interfere with the required buffering and landscaping. I
LUP-2.5 encourages the consideration of special development techniques in single
family areas provided that the development is consistent with the quality and character
of existing neighborhoods. Due to the elimination of the side yard setback requirement, I
staff feels that allowing a reduced lot size for attached single family (duplex)
development accomplishes this while still maintaining the character of the surrounding
neighborhoods.
LUP-4.5 requires compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas
by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. The areas of the city zoned Garden
Office are located along arterials and provide a natural transition to residential areas.
The maximum height requirement in the GO district represents less than a 30%
increase from the residential areas and landscaping buffering is required. These are
the areas where medical and dental clinics would typically locate.
HP-1.1 requires the consideration of the economic impact of development regulations on the cost of housing. Allowing the replacement oftexisting, legally placed, single wide ,
manufactured homes enables the property owner to make improvements while not
imposing additional economic hardship, allows a legally established use to continue and
provides additional affordable housing.
Lastly, the remaining amendments are being proposed strictly to correct errors or
' inconsistencies as follows:
Lot dimensions within the MF-1 zone are being updated so that they are consistent
mathematically with the minimum lot size requirements and the IVlanufacture Home
Roof Pitch will be consistent with state law. Requiring a substantial change in circumstances for a zone change to be approved is an additional requirement, not
mandated by state law and case law shows that if a zone change is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, a substantial change is not necessary.
The proposed amendments to the zone meet the above outlined goals, and are thus
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
OPTIONS: Proceed as proposed, or as modified; or direct staff further.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council Consensus to bring this forward for an
ordinance first reading at the November 18, 2008 Council meeting.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL INlPACTS: None.
~
.J STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen - Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft 19-A, 19.30, 19.40.120, 19.40.020, 19.40.010, 19.60.010, 19.70.010, and 19.70.020
~ ,
FINllINGS AND RECOiN-IlVIE\'DATIOr7S OF TAESPOKANE VALLEY PLANN(NG COINMUSSION
September 30, 200$
The following fmdings have been prepared by Staff for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrenee
with the recommended approval.
Background:
A. The Unifonn Development Code was adopted in September 2007 and beaame effective on October 28, 2007.
B. FolloNNring the adoption of the code a number of items were foimd to be eiiher incorrect, impractical, or
omitted.
C. The amenciments outlined here are the some of the first corrections to the code recommended by staff.
D. The Planning Commission helcl a public hearing on September 25, 2008. The Plan.ning Commission
approved the fallowing amendments to the Spokane Valley Mun.icipal Code, Titlc 19:
1. Section 19-A (Schedule of Permitted Uses) to allow medicalldental clinics to locate in the Garden Office
District
2. Chapter 1930 (Changes and Amendments) Remove item 7 which requires that there have been
substantial changes in an area since the adoption of the codc.
3. Chapter 19.40.120 (Manufactured Housing) Update the required roof pitch to reflect -vvhat is required by
state la«< and add a provision which would allow the replacement of existinD single wide manufactured
~ homes under certain circiunstajices. 4. Chapter 19.40.020 (1Zesidential Standards) Update the matrix to allow for a reduced duplex lot size,
correct the lot width in the MF-1 zone so that it is correct mathematically, and update tihe matrix to
include information related to the setback of structures from a private driveway easement.
5. Chapter 19.40.010 (General Provisions) Add a provision «fiich would allow certain aacessory structures
to encroach intn the required setbacks and add requirements related to the placement of outdoor lighting
in resiclential areas.
6. Chapter 19.60.010(General Requuements) Add a provision which would flllow cerlain accessory
structures to encroach into the required setbacks, and add a requirement for the screening of refuse
storage areas.
7. Chapter 19.70.010 (Light Industrial District) Add a provision which would allow certain accessory
structures to encroach into the required setbacks.
8. Chapter 19.70.020 (Heavy Industrial District) Add a provision which would allow certain accessory
structures to encroach i.nto the required setbacks Findings:
. SVMC 17.80.150(F) states that Che City may approve amendments to the UDC if it finds that:
(A) the proposed amcndment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; and
(B) the proposed amendment aears a substantial relation to the publia health, safety, welfare, and protection of
the environment.
f 1. LUG-1 requires code provisions that "preserve ancl protect the character of Spokanc Valley's
residential neighborhoods. The requirement for setbacks from private driveway easements
provides a consistency in the appearancc of physical structures from all travel ways including
drive,vvays, private roads and public streets. The outdoor lighting standard limits the amount of "
light and glare in residential areas. Thc Planning Commission finds that the code
smenclments are coasistent with this provision.
2. LUG-3 envisions commercial areas as vital and attractive. Requiring refuse storage areas to be
screened works to accomplish this. Allowing limited accessory structures to encroach into the
required setbacks allows flexibility of design while still maintaining separation benveen principal
structures. The Planning Commission fnds that the code aniendments are consistent with
this provision.
3. LUP-1.3 ca.lls for innovat:ion and flexibility in the design of new residentia.l developments.
Allowing limited accessory structures to encroach into required setbacks allows a certain measure .
of f•lexibility while still providing adequate setbacks for principal structures, The Planning
Commission finds that the codc amendments arc consistent with this provision.
4. LUP-113 requires buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas.
Allowing a limitecl amount of encroachment intA the required seCbacks would not interfere with
the required buffering and lanciscaping. The Pl9nning Commission finds t6at the cnde
amendments arc consistent with this provision.
5. LUP-2.5 encouragcs the consideration of.special development techniques in single family areas
provided that the development is consistent with the quality and character of exisking
neighborboods. Due to t11e elimination of side yard setback requirement, the planni.ng
cotnmission feels that allowing a reduced lot si2e for attached single family (cluplex) development
accomplishes this Nvhile still maincaining the character of the sunounding neighborhoods. The 1'lanning Commission finds that the code amendmeuts are consistent Nr-ith this provision.
6. LUP-4.5 requires compatibiliry between mised-use developments and residential areas by
regulating height, scale, setbacks, aiid buFfers. The areas of the city zoned Garden Office are
located along arterials and provide a natural transition to eesidential areas. The ma.Yimum height
requirement in the GO district represents less than 30% increase from the residential areas and
landsc•ape bufficring is requirecl. These are the areas where medical and dental clinics would
typiGally locate. The Planning Commission finds that the eode amenclments are consistent
with this provision.
7. HP-1.1 requires the consideratioii of the economic impact of devclopment re;ulations on
the cost of housing. Allowing the replacement of existuig, legally placed, singlc vvide
manufachred homes e.nables the propertp owmer to make unprovements while not
unposing additional economic hardship, allows a legally established use to continue and
provides additional affordnble housing. The PlAnning Commission fincls that the code
amendments are coasistent with this provision.
8. Lastly; the rcmaining amendments arc being proposed strictly to correct errors or inconsistencies
as follows:
Lot dimensions within the Mi'-1 zane are being updated so that ihey are consistent
mathematicall}< with the minimum lot size requirements and the Manufactured Home Roof Pitch
will be consistent with state law. Requiring a substantial change in ciraumstances for a zone
change to be approved is an additional reyuirement, not mandated by state law and case law
shows that if a zone chlnge is consistent with the Compreliensive Plan, a substantial change is not
necessary.
,
Conclusions:
The proposed amendments meet [he applieable provisions of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Recommendations:
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends approval to the City Council ot' proposed
amendmcnts to Title ] 9 oFthe Spokane Valley iMunieipal Code.
Approvecl this 25`f' day of September, 2008
Ian Robert.con, Chairman
TEST
~
ea na Griffith, Administrativ istant
~
Chapter 19.30
CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS
Sections:
19.34.010 Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments.
19.30.020 Area-wide rezones.
19.30.030 Site-specific zoning map amendments.
19.30.040 Development regulabon text amendments.
18.30.010 Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments.
Pursuant to RCW 36.70.130(2)(a), proposed updates to the Comprehensive
Pian will be processed onty once a year except tor the adoption of original
subarea plans, amendments to the shoreline master program, the amendment of
the capital facilities chapter concurrerit with the adoption of the C'rty budget, in the
event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the Comprehensive Plan filed
with the Grawth Management Hearings Board.
~ Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments are classified as Type IV
development applications and shall be processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140.
(Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
19.30.020 Area-wide rezonea.
Area-wide rezones shall be considered only in conjunction with updates to the
Comprehensive Plan text and maps to ensure full consideration of the cumuiative
effects of all changes.
~ Area-wide rezones are classified as Type tV development applications and
shall be processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
19.30.030 Site-apecific zon(ng map amendments.
A. Site-specific zoning map amendment requests may be submitted at any
time. Site-specific zoning map amendments are classified as Type III
development applications and shall be processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140.
~ B. AlI site-specific zoning map amendment requests must meet all of the
following criteria:
~ 1. The requirements of the Chapter 22.20 SVMC, Concurrency;
2. The requested map amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan;
~ 3. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public heafith,
safety and welfare;
~ 4. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with
the Comprehensive Plan or because of a need far edditional property in the
proposed zoning district classification, or because the proposed zoning
classification is appropriate for reasonabie development of the subject property;
~ 5. Property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include corner touches
and property located across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or
higher zoning classification;
19 3Q zone criteria Pm 1 of 2
Ycd FS 1't1s~-n1.~:..~~hridae4AnAU,pdW 10-47-08La' 14 30 430 emcnd sitt Mag:&xone 9-1 1 -
nYa..,,u-r., Iense~_
■
x'
( 6. The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or
property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property;
7. 64-reurnstancEC--ha,re-Ghange-d-subsra#lally--r'
i~e-sUcF9W-22er+iRg-d+s,*f;G*t--t~-wa~l- ~k~e-r~qi~e~ted-,~ap-amendmen!~ and
8. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a
whote. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
19.30.040 Oevelopment regulation text amendments.
Requests to amend the text of the City's development regulations may be
submitted at any time. Text amendments are classif~ed as Type N development
applications and shall be processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80_ 140. (Ord. 07-015
§ 4, 2007).
19.30 rez.one crite 'a I'aye 2 of 2
1;SY-FS I1l;set:~CAainbricluAtcndaMIct 10-Q7-08'PC 19 34 439 airxnd sisoec-Rctone 4_l l.
19.40.120 Manufacturnd howing.
A. Pursuant to the rcquirements of Chnpter 3521 RCW, the City dues aot discrirtunate agaisist
consumcrs' choices in the placemeni or use of a home that is not equaUy applicab(e to all hames.
This section applies only to manufactured housing units placed an individual lats.
B. Nomes built to 42 U.S.C. 7 Sectians 5401 through 5403 standards (as they msy be
amended) aie regulatcd for the purposcs of siting in thc same manner as site-built homes, factory-
buih hnmes, or homes built to any other siste construc:tion or loca] design standard; provided,
however, that thc manufactured hamc shall:
1. Be a"new" manufactund 6ome; and
2. Be set upoa a permanent foundatiori, as specified by the manufactumr, nnd that the
space fium the bottom of the home to the ground be enclased by concrete or aa approved praduct
whicb can be either losd-bearing or decorative; and
3. Comply aith all local design standnrds, including tbc nquirement far a pitched roaf
with a slope of not Icss than 44-223:12, applicablc to all c►ther homes within ihe oeighborhood in
which the manufactured home is ta br lacated; and
4. Be thermally oquivalent to the state energy code; end
5. Otherwise meet all other rcquirements for a designatod manufactured home as dcfined
in RCW 35.63.160.
C. This seetian docs aot override any legally rxacded covrnants or deed restrictians of recorci.
A"ncw manufactured home" means any manufgctured home requircd to be titled under RCW
Title 46, which ha3 nat been previously titled to a retail purcha.ser, and is not a"used mobilc
hame" as defined in RCW 82.45.032(2).
A"designated manufacturcd home" is n manufactwe.-i home constructed af3er June 15, 1976, in
accordgnce wi►h staie and federal requirements for manufactured humes, which:
1. Is camprised of at least two fully eoclosed parallel scctions each of not less than 12
feet wide by 36 fect ibng; and
a An existin,s single wide manufartured home muv be replaccd with a"neu" single
~vide manufactured home wben replaccment is initiatcd wittun 12 months of Lbr, dale ot damaic
w},ic ncmt lass than 80g'o of market valua or temoval Qf sting habitable menufactti r?d
LQm.
2. Was originally constructed with and now has a compositian or wood shake or shinglr.
coated mctal, nr similar roof of nominal 44q-31?pitch; and
3. Has ea~wior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on
convcntional site-built Internntional F3uildine Cocle single-famil}' nesidonces. (Uni. 07-015 ~ 4,
2007).
1944 Mfa hausing amendme,~i Pa1of 1
1~SY•F$1~~Tf~'~$~ltltlf~~Yt~dIIApC~Ct110-07-0$'~Pt 1'+ 1:'1 ~~J~ li!.'------=n~':;tc;~; - f`ii,ii
aa.d
Chapter 19.40
DISTRICT PURPOSE AND SUPPLEMENTAL USE
REGULATIONS - RESIDEh'TIAL ZONES
Sections:
19.4 I U Ciencral provisions.
19.40.020 Residential standards.
19.40.030 R-1 - Single-Family Residenual Estate district.
9.41 0.044 R-2 - Single-Fnmily Residential Suburban district.
19.40.050 R-3 - Single-fiamily Residential district.
19.40, R-4 - Single-Family Residential Urban distrirt_
9.4 .070 MF-1 - Mcdium Density Multifamily Rcsidential distrirt.
19.40•08U MF-? - High Deasity Multifamily Residential district.
19.40.090 Residential accessory uses and structures.
19.40 10 Accessary dwelling unit (ADU).
19.40.110 Other accessory• structures.
9.1 40.120 Manufaciured hausing.
19•40• 13Q Manufactured home parks.
9.41 0• 14Q Home occupations.
19.40.150 Animal raising and kceping.
19.40.010 General provisions.
A. No principal ar accessory struclure shall t►e located %vitlun the cleaniew triangle
(Chapter 22.70 SVMC).
B. In the disvicts where the height of buildings is restricte3 to 35 feet, cooling to,,vers,
roof gablcs, chimnzys und vent stacks ma}• extend for an additional 6eight, not to rxceetl
40 feet, above the average grade line of the building. Watcr stand pipes and tsinks, church
steeples, domes and spires and schoal buildings and institutional buildings ma}' be
erected to exceed maximum height requirements; provided, that one additional fout shall
be added to the m-idth and depth af fmni, sidr and rear yards for each foot that stich
structures esceed the required height.
C. No structure may be erected to a height in excess of that permitted by applicable
aitport hazard zoning regulations.
D. Rccreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwclling units in
any residenlial zone. Guests may prirk and,for occtipy a recreational vehicle while visiting
the occupants of a dwelling unit lacated on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one
cansecutive 12-month period. 'Ihe intent is to accommodate visiting gues-ts and not to
allow the recreational vehicle to be used as a dweUing uniL (Urd, 08-006 § 1, 2008; Ord.
07-015 § 4, 2007).
E. -Ouuloor I.ighting: AnY liQhts. whether freestandirut or attached to a building or
structure, which illuminate any outdoor am of a lot. shall be posidoned placed.
constructod, shielded vt used so that the direciion of the light is downward and within the
pgpertv lines. non-cunforming liQhts shal! be discontinucii within a period of 180
days ftom the e8eetive date of this prc,vision. Thisprc~~~ision does not appIy ligliting
provided by public or private udlities.
19.40 amends outdoor lightii.~ arid projectiuns Puve 1 of' 2
N~,Sv-FSiw Xftin 'e,n~a io-oMgTc AMENnra 19 40 010 am«na acr n c ana pMi..25-
. , . _ . . .
pC:_}q.u:~lti,e:~~r.~~-e1}~-l:ukt r.~r'r~•~.-v-{ I..fi~
F. 'I'he followinw, fentures attached to seructures are allowed as rxceptiuns to the
setbscl stnnclards:
1. Minor Proiertioas AIlowed: Minar featurrs of a structure, such as eaves,
chimncys firc escapes, by wiaslows no morc than 12 fcet long and which
cantilever beyond the foundatioa af the structure uncovered stairwa~ys and
uncovered decks or balconies, may extend into a nq,Suted structure setback up
to owntv txrcent of the depth pf the setback Howvver, thcy may not be
within thM feet of a lot lint Hfien a setbuck is mauired. VVheeichair comps
are allowed to project into the seftck bssed on Title 24 of th,e SVMC
Building Cafes Att$ched mechanical cquinment such as heat numns, air
c4nditioners emergency generators and w•aier pumps are al[owed to projeci
into the sidc ar rear setback onl%,.
19.40 amends outdoor ljghtingdnd prujections Patze ? of'
\'tit4' FSI\t]s.r'CAainbridgcLdm+d■^hdmg 10-07-08T' tiME.NDFP 19 40 010 emrnd Otdr liaht cs+~icct2-:S_
I:ifl4i' . ~~-~~ASi7.f~"_.a*a'•!~'S-Ls~izT::±:a:~.n.{.rsslr~U_~.~...Cii_'.__ -
19,40.020 Resideatial standardx.
A. Residential development shall meet the minimum arc:a and setback requirements, and
maximum lot coverage and building height requirement: shown in Table 19.40-1.
r Table 19.40.1 - Resideatial Zoae Dimensioaal Standards in Feet R-1 R-2 R-3 R4 MF-1 htF-2 PRD
Singlg Family_Lot 40,000 10,000 7.500 6,000 3,6(}0 2,000 Underlying
Area, Mr zone
Duplex Ot 8IC8 DCf 0000 5.000
dwtllm IL
Lot µ-idlh 80 RO 65(4) 50 5-041 20 30
th 100 90 90 80 80 80 50
` Lot DZ
Front d F
lanking 35 15 15 1 S 15 15 15
Minimurn Street Yard Setback
(2)Oj
Garage Setbnck 35 20 20 20 20 20 20
2 3
Rcar Yard Setback 20 20 20 20 10 10 15
1 3
Side Yard Setback 5 5 S 5 5 S 5
(1
Open Spnce 10% gross area
Lot Covetage 30.0°10 50.0% 50.0% 55.0% 60.0% 65.0% 60.0%
Ma.rimum Building Height ([n 35 35 35 35 40 SO llnderlying
Feet) 'LODC
(1) No accessory structure sha11 be located in the front ar flanking strtct yard, and shall be set bACk
not less than five feet from an , side or rear ard.
(2) Attached gnrages, uhere the garago door does not face the street, may have the same setback as
the rinci al structure.
L3} SetUacl:s, when adjacent to a private road or d-nvewa} e emcnt, are established from the
iMXr e•dUd vf thc raad or driveway and are the same as noted a}ovic except the tlanJ:ing
rAad which would bc fivr (,5) feet. -~~~~-€f tim Ow frpl--- °r~fe::ij <-r
ri:--~i.~•:kE-
L 4 j Uuplex lots in E-3 zone5 ninv be a minimum of 60 fe~t in width
I
I 19.40 amend drive seiback, duplex lot size, MF-1 lat width Nage 1 of 1
\'.SV-FSI'~llscrx\CF3ainbridge'.ugrndupacicet 10-07-CIRIFC amendod 19 40 020 amrnd runtrix duplex MF-l drive srtbk 9-30-03.doc
Chapter 19.60
DISTRICT PURPOSE AND SUPPLEMENTAL USE
REGULATIONS - COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MIXED USE
ZONES Amendments
19.60.010 General Reyuirements
~ A. Nonresidential development shall mcet the nunimum setback and the maximum
hcight requirements shown on Tablc 19.60-1.
~ B. Parking areas shall be paved and landscaped in accordance with Chapter 22.50
sVMC.
~ C. New development exceeding three stories in height shall be provided with paved
service lanes not less than 16 feet ia width.
D. AII new development shall provide for shared access with adjacent properties.
E All ou oor ttash g~b ge and refus~ storage ar~eas shall be screened on all sidcs
visible to public .iew5 or riebts-of-w~.~s with a minimum five and one-halC (5 l
fQQt high concrete btock or masoarv wall or sight-obscuringfence with a siubt
Qbscwin$ ¢ate and two (2) feet of Type 11 landsoning in aecordeuce with Fieure
22.70-8 SVMC.
1--4. The following structures may br erected above the height limits of this Code in
the Office, Coinmercial, and Mu:ed Use zones, provided; (A) 'lhe structure is
accessory to ar pan of a building which is a permitted use in the zane; (B) '['hc
structure camplies with the height limits in thc Airport Overlay zone; and (C) No
re:sidendal use of the structure shall occur above the height limits prescribcd in the
rcine.
~ 1. Penthouses or roof structures for the housing of elevaiors, stainwuys, tanks,
ventilating fans, or similar equipment to operate and maintain a building.
~ Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flugpoles, chimneys, church steeples, belfrics,
wireless masts, and similar svuctures.
~ 3. Structwes such as silos, feed mills, bntch plants, anci fixed cranes which are
used in a manufacturing proccss which ucitizes verticul proccssing and storuge
of maierials.
4. Water stand pipcs and tanks.
GF The followin$ featurrs attached to siructures atc allowed as exce.ptions to thc
setback standerds:
1 Minor Projecrions Allowed_
Mwor features of a structure suc:h as eaves. chimneys. fire escapes. bav windows
po more than 12 feet long and which cantilever bcyond the foundation of thc
gnucrue uncovered stairways, wheelchair rama§ and uncoveted decks or
balcogim may extend into a required sq-uctures setback up ta tweaty percent
of the d!Mth of the setback. Hawever, thev maY not be within three feet of a
lQl licte when a setback is reguired.
19.60 19,70 amending,amjections in commercial and industrial zones Paae 1 of 5
\\cv_r.c i 1U.mKcai.,t,.;djwt&xdanuctiz 1 D-07-01M AMENDED 19 60 19 70 amcncf PWjections nfi=4•2S •
(}4 .a11: .90( Ri~ifF4~-~4:~~C1
C.:.Si.✓{ tQ
i~:.: Y
2. Full Yroiecuons Allo%Ned.
In addition to subsc.~ccion 19.60.0 lUWI-)( 1). che followinu featum arr allo%cd
to pmject farther wto the mguired structure setbacl:
a. C$nopics marquecs awaings and similar features makfullv extcnd into a
strzet sctback and may extend int4 the public right-of-way subjgct to the
requirrments of thc buil" code and adopted street stwdards
b. Uncovcred stairwavs ~~-~ee4-•#~~~--~~~--that lead to one enttattce oa
the s,treet-facinst facadc of a building may fully cxtend into a stmct
setback. Wheelchair ramp,§..are allawed to projsct into tht setback bused
on Title 24, of the SVMC. Building Codes
c. Uncovert'd decks and stairwavs that are np morc than fQrty-tvvo inches
above the ground may fully extend into a required structttre setback: and
d. Qn lots t}uit slope down firom the svicet. vehicular and pedestrian entry
bridges that are no more than forty-1wQ inches nbove the averake sidcwaik
elevation may fiill,y extetd into a required swcture setback.
e• Balconies tnav extend into public riis-of-wav as allowed in ihe building
code and adopted street standards
f. Attached mcchanical equipment such as hrat pumos, air conditioners.
emffgency genetators and wEtter pumps are slluvvod ta prQject into the side
or rcar yard setback onlX,
19.70.010 Lighi lnciustrial
A. The Light Industrial designation is a planned industrial area Khth specia] emphasis
and attention gitien to aesthetics, landscaping and intemal and community
compatibility. "Cypical uses wUUld include technology and other lo,.ti,•impact
indusiries. Light iadustrial areas may also include office and commercial uses as
ancillary uses within an ovcrall plan for industriril devclopment.
I B. Supplemental Regulntions
l. 1he outdoor storage pmvisions cantained in SVMC 19.60.060(B) Shatl aprly
to the I-1 districl.
~ 2. Mobile food vendors shall be located Un/w•ithin dcsignated areas which do not
interfere «1th parking ot internal circulation with perm.ission of the property
awmer, health certificate and pernut.
3. Setbacks:
a. Front and flanl:ing sveei yard setbacks shell be 20 feet; and
b. Side and rear yard setbacks of 35 feet are required only adjacent to
residential zoning districts. (Ord. 07-015 4, 2407)
~ 4. The following structures may bc erected abovc the height limits of this Code in
the Otlice. Commercial, and A4ixed Use r.ones, proN7ded; (A) The structure is
acces-sory to or pail of e building wluch is a pernutied use in the zone; (B) The
structure complies with the height limits in the Airpart Overlay zone; and (C)
19.60 19.70 runcndingpmiections in commercial atad industrial zQnes Pag..e 2 of 5
~\,SV-FS1!U5~i~1CBainWWotu ~1&"ket 10-07-Wf'C AMEtiDED 19 60 19 70 eaxad Qip"yrctians rrftut 9-23-
t)S.dp~,~l~,~~-.;i~tt{ti~ •`1'~~-
.)te~.-=-.}-L~1-~t1_(..:.-}fl
- . - - - - . - - • -
tio residential use of the swciure shall accur abotie the height limits
prescribed in the zone.
~ aA. Penthouses or coof stnictures for the housing of clevators, stainvaNs,
tanks, ventilating fans, or similar equipment to operate and maintain a
building.
~ Fire or parapet walls, skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeples,
belfries, wireless masts, and simitar swctures.
~ _q,;. Structures such as silos, feed cnills, batch plants, and fixed cranes which
are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical proeessing and
stotage of materials.
d.. Water stand pipes and tanks.
5 The following. features ariached to structures m aliowed as excrptivns to thc
settack sundards' Mi.nor Pr9iectioas Allowed.
a Minor fcatlues of a struclwe such as eaves chimrtevs fire cscapes bav
windows no morc ihan 12 frtt long and which cantilever bevond the
foundation of the shuctureuncovered stainvays, wfieeichair ramps and
ed dccks or bt►llconies maX extettd into a required structures
uncover
setback up ta twentx perceat of the deuth of the setback. However. they
My npt be within three fezt of a 1Qt line when a setback is Mguired.
b. FuU Proiections Allowal.
ln addition to subsection 19.60.01 0(P)(1l the followinst features_ are
allowed to prQject f~r into the required structm seIback:
i Canopies mamuees awrting,s and simiier featurea may fully extend
into a stnxt setbaRck and may c-tend iAtQ the pubIic riQht-of wav
svbiect to tht teguirements of the building code and adonted strw
~un-darb,
u Uncovered staicways that lcad t4 one entiance
c►n the Street-faciM, faode of a buildin$ msy fully extend into a street
setbeck. Wheelchair ramns are allowed to p,roiect into the se~tbaek
bu.sed on Title 24 of thc SVMC, BuildiQg Codes
iii Uncovercd decics and stainvays that arc no more than forty-two inches
abovc thc grQUnd may fully cxtend inta a rcquired structure sctback•
and
iv. On -lQts thet stolx dov►m from the street, vehicular and pedestrian entrY
brid$cs ihat nrc no more than fortv-1wv inches utwve the averan
ridewaJk eievation may fully extend into a rcauired structure setback
v Balconies mak exteQd into public rights-of-wav es all owcd in tlie
building c.ode and ad4pted stmi swndards
vi Attached mechaaical gauinmetit such as heat Rumps air conditionecs,
emergenc.y gecwmwrs and water.pumo are tilluw-cd to Qroisct into the
side or rear vard setback only.
19.70.020 I-?, Hesvy Industrial
19.60 19.70 amendinQ nroiections in commercial and industrial zones Page 3 of 5
uSV FSI\Uxra1 •'wbrid~ct9d ►.l(}-U7-OE1PC MlENDED 19 64 14 74 tmaxl ~icctions ref~~ 9-~-
08
~i--a{!
l~.i..
~ A. Heavy lndustrial designated property is chnracteri7ed by intense industrial
activities wfiicb include manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly, freight
handling and similar operations. Heavv industr}• ma}• haN-e significunt noise, odor
or aesthetic impacts.
{ B. Supplemcntal Regulaiions
~ 1. 1-2 allows any use permitted in chc I-1 zoning district, elcepl as sper.itically
provided in Appendix 19-A.
~ -1. iviobile faod vendors shall be located on/within designated areas which do nat
interfere with intemal circulaiion with permission of the property owncr,
health certif cate and permit.
~ 3. 'rhe foUowing structures may be erected above the height limits of this Code
in the Office, Commercial, and Mixed Use zones, grovided; (A) The structure
is accessory to or pari of a building which is a permitted use in the zone; (B)
The swcture complies with the height limits in the Airport Overlay zone; und
(C) No residential use of the structure shall occw above the height limits
prescribecl in the zone.
~ 1 a. Penthouscs or roof structures for the housing of clevators, stainva}-s,
tanks, vCntilating fans, or similar eyuipment to opemte and maintain a
building.
Fire or parapet walls, skylip,hts, flagpoles, chimneys, church steeple5,
belfries, wireless masts, and similar structures.
~ ~c. Structures such as silos, feed mills, baich Flants, and fixed cranes which
are used in a manufacturing process which utilizes vertical processing and
storage of materisls.
Id. Water stand pipes and tanks.
4. 7be following features attached to structures are aI! wed as exceptions to t,h~
setback standards:
1. MinQr Projcctions Allowed.
Minor features of n swcture, such as eaves, chime_ys. fire escapes. bay
windows no more than 12 &ct tong and a•hich cantilgver beyond ft,
foundation of the structure. uncovered stain;z s• ~~~~~hai--F, f
uncovered degks ar bal nies. mav extend into a requited structures
sctback up to twenty,p-qrcent of the depth of the setback. However, tte~tnay aot br w•itliin threr feet of a lot line when u setback is required.
Wheelchair mmps are allowed to project into the setb ck based on Titlc
24, of the SVMC. Building Codes
2. Full Pn_jeciions Allowed.
In addition to subSection ! 9.60.010(F)(11. ttie falluwing features are
allowed to ~.oject fariher into the requireti $Vucture setbK- k;
a. anopies, marquees, awnings and similar features may full), extend
into a strvet setback and mav extend into the ubp lic right-of-wa%•
5ubj,ect to thc m-guirements of the building code and adopted stree.t
startdards.
19.60 19.74 amendingprojections in eotanmercial and iadustrial zanes Page 4 ot 5
1'~.SV•FSI\UscrslCBainbridgc'~gtt~~apaclcet 10-07-0&PC aM1rNAED 19 60 19 70 uuirndMiections rcfusc v_2-
Q$.d~^~.~;~-r^r.e!.~,-~-.u::_t~~~+►.t~
~ . _ u7 t.,• 1 ' -~~T . - i~~{_:Ik?- 1..t4H1V'
~E{aaxa;...::~...31~:ti-•--~rc- : '-':r-._ ::~-i:J1" _ ~ -_I Sil 7.~i - r.._ ' - . .
b, Uncovered stainyays aad wfieelchair ramns that lead lo one entrance
on the strect-facing f"de ot a buildin$ may fially extend into astrect
setback.
c Uncovered decks and stairwaYS that arr no more than forty-twa inches
above thc r.round mak fully extend into a rgwred swcture settrack:
~
d On -lots that slao down from ttje streeL vehicular and pcdestrian entn~
bridAes that are Qo mare than forty-two inches abov2 the averaae
sidewalk elevation mak fullv extend into a reauired structure setback.
c Balconies may cxtend into public rights-of-way as allowed in the
buildine code and adopted stteet standar~
Iz-f Atteched mechanical equinment such as heat aurno air conditioners,
emecg&acy eenerators and wwer pumps are allowed-IQprojert inro thc
side or rear vard setback onh.
19.64 19 7Q amendlrig..proicetians in commercial and industria! zones Pegg S of 5
11CY fSt`,Clx-31CBWabridS6aam¢1o„dW 10-07-WPC AIv1PNAM 19 64 19 70 amrnd nmim6 ( x 9-25-
..i~~i.._t-~._LLIA - _ !!t".~►i"1"'J~-_
„'.r.lj'= i' , • . u~'~u~
STz=~
Chapter 19.120
PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES
Sections:
19.120.010 General.
19.120.010 General.
Uses are classified using the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) published by the U.S.
Census Bureau based on category and subcategory. Subcategories include all uses not identified separately by specific
number. Uses may be permitted, be subject to conditions, or require conditional or temporary use permits as shown in
Appendix 19-A, the schedule of permitteci and accessory uses.
Mixe Corrid Gard Nelghbofi Commun I-1 1-2
M M Schedule of Pertnitfed d Ctty Reglonal Commu
R R R R NA! NAIC or en OHf ood tty Ug Hea Reference
F- F- Uses Use Cent Commer nity
-1 -2 -3 -4 CS N S S Mlxed OAic ce Commercl Commer ht vy CondlUons
1 2 Appendix 19-A Cent USQ er e al ctal cial Fscflity Ind Ind
er
dult entertainment Chapter
~ 71 ~ stabllshment v'~ ~ 18.80 SVMC
~ 45 453 uft retaU use Chapter
SVMC
establlshment '
~ 31 311 9ricuitural processirrg IP IP
lant, warehouse
~ 33 3~1 ircraft manufacturing iL
I 48 48921 Airstrip. piivate IP ip
~ 62 62191 bulance service IP 1E! tP iP ip fQ IP IP
SVMC
~ 5+1 54194 imal clfnirlvetefinary iP v~S IP lQ IQ 1.60.0 4-0 (B
I 31 31161 ~Animal processing ip
3 adlity L I
ExGuding
NAICS
11 112 Animal 8 Ing andlor 1122
n
SVMC
119,40,150.
~ 81 81281 imal ahelter IE IP
~ 31 131161 imal slaughtering end IP
rocessln
~ 45 45392 tique store IP IP le le IP IQ
~ 44 448 pparelRailor shop IP IP lQ IP IP iP IP IP
ly if
ufacture
I 44 44,11 aiertce saleslse+'vice IQ IP !P ~P A A ssembled
remises.
I pliances IP I
33 133522 anufacturi P
~ 45 45392 rt gallery/studio IP fP IP IP 1Q IE IQ IE
~ 32 32412 sphalt IP
ptant/manufadurtn
~ 33 333 ssembly - hwvy iL'
~ 33 334 mbly - llgtrt IQ IP IP lP IP IP
~ i IP IP sz 62331 Assisted uvtng facufty i tp- IP cp
~ 45 4533 uction houso ~ IP i
~ 45 4533 Auction yar+d (exduding iQ iP
ivestock)
~ 11 1152 uctian yand, livestodc iP
~ 33 3381 ut°"1Oblle assembly ~
ant
~ 92 922 utDmobile impound IQ {P
Yard
I 44 441 utomobile/light trudc IP ip lP IP
sales and service -
~ 48 4853 utomobileltaxi rental IP ip IP IP ip IP ►P IP
Enclosed
81112 W°TObile/truclURVlmot ~um
~ 61 ~ orcycie pairtting, repair, vS Ip IQ IP oNy. SVMC
body and fender works 1. 0.050(B
(3 .
~ 44 4413 utamotive parts. tP IP ip IP I~ IP
accessories and dres
~ 31 31181 Bakery products IP IE
manufacturin -
loor area
imited to
I 44 44;28 ~kery, retail IP IP IP v~ v,~ IP iP !P q A 10% oI
GLFA not to
xceed
11.000 sf.
tank, savingslloan and
~ 52 52211 ther frnancial IP IP IP IP IP IP ip aE! ZP IP
institudans
~ 81 8121 Batber/beauty shop IP iF fP A 1P
33 133591 !p IP IP IQ
I "rY IP Ip
rebuildin manufactunng
~ ip ip 4P tP IP IP 72 721~19 Bed and btealcfas! IP IP IP
~ 11 11291 Beekesping, cammercial iP
SVMC
( v Y v 11 11291 Beekeeping. hobby 1 4.150(C
~ S s S
~ 45 4511 BicyGe saleslservic.e IP IP IP ►P ip IP IP ip ip
~ 33 33861 Boat buildfng, repalr and IP IP
1 maintenance ,
I fP iP
~ 44222 Boat sales/service
~ 45 4512 8ook/stetionery store fp IP IP IP IP IP IP IQ
~ 31 3121 8otding plsM IP IP
~ 71 71395 Bowlirtg alley tP tP IP IP IP
~ 72 722 Bnewery, micro I IP IP l I I IP ~P 1
~ 31 3121 Brewery' viinefy snd/or tP IP lP tP iR 1P (E
dlstiflery
~ 33 13311119 Broom manufacturing IP I~
I
44 Buiklfng auPPly end IP cP tP
~ ~ home !m ravemeM
I 44 44529 Candy ar►d cortfectlonery lP IP ~P !P tE 1p !P IP
71 71388 Cemival, dreus T T T T T T T T
( 32 3219 Carpentef shop IP IP IP- iP
I 56 56174 Carpet and rug Clesning IP IP
0 ants
SVMC
I e1 s~2~e arwash le IE v~ IP ~p IQ iP .eo.
~ 71 7132 sino IP IP I IP i
~ 45 '~5411 atalog and mail order iP ~ rp I~ IP
3 uses
~ IP IP 72 72232 atering servlces ► ~ ~ ~ IP IP ~
~(P !P 1p t 81 8122 Cem'ery OM IP
- crematories
I 45 14521111 ramft shop IP fe le IP tp te lP
I 32 325 ChemlcaJP IP
manufacturin
Church. tempis,
~►!P le ! IP tP 81 813 mosque, syrtegogue and IP tP te IP tf! IP IP IP
parsonage
~ 44 4481 lothes, rotail "es iP !P IP IP IP
~ 49 49312 Cold storage/iood locker IP ie
~ 61 6113 College or unlversfty IP IP IP IP Ip IP !P IP
I
51 517 ommunfcation
IP IP IP IP IP IP IQ IP
rvicetsales
CommuMcaUons
~ 33 3342 equipment IQ IP IQ IP
manutaciuring
(iP IP iP H tP te 92 9~ ommunity faalides IP IP 1P IP tP !P IP IP iP (Q IP
CommuniEy hell, dub,
~ IP IP IQ 81 8134 lodge or necreational IP IP IP IP IP IP lP IP
acility
ommunity resjderitial
~ IP Ip IP 62 16232 acility (B or less iP
resldents)
Community residenNal
~ IP IP iP_ 62 6232 ~lity (greater than 6 iP
- residents, no more than
25)
Composting
~ 56 56173 storagelprooessing, ►P
rttercial
~ 54 54151 omputer services tP IP ip IP IP 1P IP IP IP IQ
~ 23 ?238 Contracto~'s yard 1 e 1P
Convalescent home,
~ I~ IP IQ 62 623 ursing home ip IP
~ 44 44512 ornenienCe stone tE !P_ A A IQ 1P- tp IP iP
Cosmetic and
~ 33 339 misc:ellaneous IP IP
manufacturing
~ iP IP 1P i IP IP 62 6233 Dey care, adutt IP IP I A IP IP IP A A A
62441 gildren y car~e, chiid (13
~ C C C C IP IP 62 {f? I~ A A +P A A A
- - 0 or more)
1 f 1 I 62 ~~1 Day cere, chikl (12 ~ ~ Ip A A I~ IP tF A A A
~ Q P~ p iidren or feweo
~ as 4521 OepatrrtenWariety store rP lQ i]P_ IQ ip
~ M 41611 Orug st,ore IP IP IP A IE IP IP IP A IP
~ 81 8123 Ory cleaners IQ IQ ip A IP iP IP If!
Dry cleaning, ls~unciry,
~ 81 812~ inen suPPtY Pl~t. IQ IP
mmerciaJ
I ~ 32111 ry ~n iQ
14
I v v vl 1 81 814 ~Iling. accessory ~C
~ 19.4 .t
814 ~Ifing, cst~kees ~ y~ vS svmc
I 1 .
81
residerx:e v .
~ IP IP 72 7213 owelrrg, co~ate iP iP Ip I - ip
~ I t Ip tp 81 814 Dw~elling, duplex
SVMC
~ i Ip i~ 81 814 oweliin9, munttamiry IP ip e 4~ ~ o(B
>
vNIC
~ 1 tP IP fP IP $1 814 lirtg, single-farNly v~S vsS 19.60,0 B
I 1 IP iQ 81 814 Dwelling, townhouse IQ fP IP !P
EfecMcaUelectronic/com
( 33 334 - puter compor~enf and IP ~ ip ip iQ i~ I~
335 system
nianufacturinglassembly
32222 Emery doth and
I 32 6 Papef tp IP
manufactWn
~ 71 713 F-ntertairunent/recreabon ip IP IQ IP (Q
hHes, incfoor
~ 71 7139 ntertainmertflrecreation IP Ip Ip IP tP iP
aalitiss, outdoor
~ 53 5323 Equipment rental shop "P tQ IP IQ I P-
I Equfpment sales, repair,
iP fP Ip IP IP
81 8113
nd mainter►ance
~ 72 7222 ~~~8~e relsil !P IP {e IP IP I~ IP tP IQ IP IP
R ' 92 92 Essential public fadlitles ==R ~B ~R >R 'R 19a~ svmC
( A A 71 71394 ~e~~ IP IP :P A A !P IP IP IQ A A
faalityl tliletic dub
~ 32 32592 Explosive manufacturing IP
~ 49 490319 Explosive stomge IP IP
~ IP IP IP IP IP !P 81 814 Famlly home, adult IP {P sP IQ IP
~ cP IP ►P IP fQ if! 81 814 Famity home, chlld IP IP IP tP
I 44 44122 IFarm machinery sales ►P !P IP
2 Hrxl repair
i 11 11211 Feed lot IP
31121 IP IP
~ 31 ~ Feedkereal~lour mill
I 32 3253 Fertitizer menuFacturing 'p-
~ 81 81292 Film developing IP IP IP A A IP !P IP
ilm/camera
~ 44 4~1313 WNice IP IP IP A A iQ IP IP
~ 45 4531 Florist ahop Ip IP tp A A !Q IP IP tP
~ 31 311 Food product IP
manufacturing/stora e
Food sa{es, C svm
~ 44 44521 pecialrylbutc,er IP IP IF ip ip t. o(e
slioplmeat )(3)
markeUspecialty foods
~ 48 484 FreigM fo►warding iP IP
~ 44 447 Fueling staiion tP IP tP A IP IQ tQ IP
~ 81 81221 urlerei ho►ne ip IP IP
J 33 337 Fumiture manuiscturing IP IP
~ 31 315 Garment menufscturing ip ip
~ 45 453 ift shop ip 1E IP A A !P IQ IP A
~ IP I!P I tP ip 71 71391 Golf caurse IP 1~ IP 1P
~ C C C C C C 71 71391 lf driving IP C IP tP IP
ngeltralni center
~ 49 49313 rain elevator ;L IP
I 44 ¢4422 Greenhouse. IP IP IP IQ IP IQ svmc
~ 11 1114 Greenhouse. nursery, v~ vS ip IP 19.60. B
1commercial 3)
svmc
~ 44 4451 rocery store IP !P IQ F IP (3) 1 60.040(B
SVMC
~ 44 44413 Hardware 5iore IP (P IQ u~S ~P IP 1.80. B
(3
I 5s 156221 Hazardous waste v~ vS svmc
"atme M and storage 21.40.060
1
~ 48 4812 Heliport ~ !P
~ 48 4812 Heiistop C C C C C IP
1 45 45112 Hobby shop iQ IP tP A IP Ip IP
~
~ 44 442 ome fumishings, retail IP IP ~Q iP
le
~ 62 6221 ospital IP ip t- tP tp IP
I > > > > ~ 62 62221 ospit81, psychietrlc and ~g S~ aB ,g '3 '3 '3
R R R R 0 ubstance abuse
I 62 62231 HspeCjalty {P IP iQ IP fE! 11! lP A A
~ 72 7211 Hocevmotei iP IP I? ip iQ ip iP [P
I 31 31311 Ice piant IQ IP
~ 32 32591 Ink manufactunng I?
Jwirolry, clock, musical
~ 45 145322 instrument assembty. IP 1P IP A Ip iP iQ I Q IQ
loslservice
Kennel, indoor kennel, See zonin9
~ 81 81291 ie d cere faclii vS vS vS vS IP iP istricts for
do99 aY h+ nditions.
~ 54 54138 baratories (Bio Safety if! IP IP
l.eve12
~ 54 154138 Lab°ratories (Bio Satety IP IP IP
Level 3)
I 54 54138 Laboratories (Blo Sefeiy IP IP
Level a)
I Laboratories, medipl
62 62151 IP fP fP !p IP I E
and dt nosdc
( 44 MM 19 Landsc2pe matenals IR Ie IP IP
sa{es -
I 81231
A A A 81 0 Laundromat IP IP A IP tP IP IP
1 44 4453 Liquor store IP 1P IP A A IP IP
~
I 56 5B262 LOCksMO lp tP IP A A IP 4P IP
I 32 3211 Lumber-mill, savKnill, IP
shin te mill, ptywood mlll
~ 33 33271 chine shop IP IP IP
~ 33 333 Machinelmachinery IP IP
manufacfirrin
~ 23 23611 Manufactured home iP ip
5 abrication
I S 81 814 ~Manufactured home psri~ 19~4 C1 0
~
45 45393 Manufadured home Ip tp IP
I isales
Manufacturing,
~ 32 327 rtonmetatl~c metal IP IP
produds
45 458 9 arket, outdoor T T T T T T
~ 62 162149 essage tt,erapy ip ip lP IP 1E ip IP- ip
13116 Meat/ftsh cannfng,
~ 31 - utting, curing end IE! 1E
3117 mokl
Medical and laboratory
I 33 3391 instrument/appratu IQ ip Ip
manufacturin
Medical, denhat, and
~ 42 42345 hospital equipment IQ iP ip A IP
uppf lsales
~ sz 6214 e~caudeMai anic iE iP IP P IP 1E
~Q
~ s2 621 edhcaudentai affice iP_ IP iE! IE I? IP IE
~ 33 332 Metal fabricadon ip ~P
~ 33 332 etal piating 1E
~ 33 332 Metal processes, hot iE
M[neral produd
~ manufaduring, ~Q
nonmetatlic
~ 21 212 Mining See zoning
I 72 172233 bile food ver►dors v~ vS w~ VE vS~ ~S vS vS vS i nsMcts for
T T 7 T T T 23 23~11 Nlodel home ur~ts
IP (P lP
71 71211 Muaeum iP !P {P IP IP
~
~ 45 45114 ustC store IP IP !Q A 1p IP IP
1 IP
~ A A 58 581 ffic:e IP IP IP IP ip IP IP 1P IP
I Office and computer
IP IP !P A IP IP IP fe
45 45321 -
sup lies
I 99 999 Ofi-road recreational IP IP
tvehicle use
~ 11 1113 rchab. tree tartning, ie ip
mmerdal
~ 32 32211 Paper/puip milis
~ 48 4859 Park-and-ritle facility I lP IP IP IP 1P IP ►P IQ
~ 45 52229 Pawnshop IP IF fP iP
~ 81 812 Petsonal service tQ IP IQ IP IP IP IP iE!
~ 45 45391 Pet shop IP IP IP A IP IP IP
~ 32 32411 Petroleum and coal Ee
praducts manufacturi
j 54 54192 Photographic shxliu IP IP !P A A IP IP IP
~ 32 32511 Plastic and nubber IP
roducts manufacluring
~ 32 32619 Plastic Injection molding, iP
9 ermoset
I 32 32819 Plasiic injectlan moiding, tP iP IQ IP le IP
9 heRnoplastk
~ 32 32619 Plastic injetdon sdvent IP
9 oldi
~ 49 491 Post offcce, postal centef I ► IP IP I IP 4P IP IP 1 IP
~
I 22 221 Pawer plant (excluding IP
public utility facilities)
~ 58 58143 Prlnl shop !P 1Q IP A IP IQ IP IP IP
rinting, reprographics,
~ 32 323 bookbinding services, if! I?
mmercial
~ 48 r48849 Public pay parking ~P !P ip ~P IP ;P
gatage/iat
~ IP Ip- 11PHp IP IP 22 221 P qtl c~~ di~~ iL Ip IP lQ le ►Q IP IP 1e
v v v v~ 23 237 Public utility V~ W2 ~c yS vS +►S v~ vra v~ s V.6
C
I S g nsmission faal'
~ 71 71399 Racecourse ( IP IP IP
I 71 71221 Racevadc iP !P
~ 51 5151 Rad`~ ~0~~~ IP IQ t~ IP IP IQ
I
48 Raflroad yarcf, rapeir iQ
shop and roundhouse
I 72 7212 Recreational vehicle C ~ C
paWcampground
~ 44 144121 R~~~nal vehicle 1P (P
seles end servioe
~ I I! I I I 51 51511 RepesUer facsi I IP I IP I 1
~ 72 7222 RestauraM. drive-in 1P IQ ie I? ip ip
~ 72 7222 Restaurant, drive- if! ip A C 1Q ip iQ iQ
~ 72 722 Restaurant. fufi servlce lP IE JP A IP (Q if! q! IP iL'
Umlted to
tertts
~ 45 452 - Retail sales lP IP IP A 1P Ip IP A A manufacture
453 0n tfie
remises.
~ 71 71399 Rl~ng stable I~ IP
~ 33 33122 Rdling mill iP
I 31 31199 R~ ~nufactbirding IP tP
32521 Rubber mdamatlon,
~ 32 z manufacturinglfabricatio IP
~ IP IP IP IP ie tp 61 6111 Schools, publ4c and IP IP tP IP iP IP iP
private, K through 12
Schoois, professional,
~ I~ 81 8114 ocatianal and trade tP IP IP IP lp IP IP IP IQ rp
hools
~ Showraom IP IP fP iQ IP iP
I
45 4533 Secandhand store,
IP IP IP ►P_ 1p !P_
nsl nment sales
Si9n 1 IP
~ 33 33995 manufachuf repair P
~ 33 33995 Slgn p2iinting shop IP IP IP_ IP_ iQ
Soap and Geaning
~ 32 32561 compound iQ
manufacturin
SVMC
~ 56 56292 so~id waste v~ v~ j.so. a
r+~cydingRransfef sfte
daptive
• reuse ai
SpeclaCrzed ~isfin9
~ 61 8116 iNnglleaming schools 1P ie IP IQ vS rP tp IP structures
r studias only. No
xpansion
Ilowed.
Storage, seH-service
~ 1~ 49 49319 aciliry IP IP IP IP
IStorage. generai - See zoning
~ 49 493 outdoors ma vS v31 v§ lF istrida 10r
condidons.
I ank storage. LPG yg u.$ vs vs yg vs vS vS SVMC
bove ground 1.4 .060
I 21 21311 ank storage, aitical ~ S C
2 malerial above ground v- 1.q
I 21 21311 ank storage, cxitical vS vS v$ vS svmC
2 materfal belaw ground - 4
~ 31 3161 annfng, cunng o1 hides IP
d skirts
~ 72 7224 av~m IP i~ !P tP IP
I a.,ddemy IP IQ
v v v v eleoommunlcatlon C
22
I~~~~ v~ L51 15172 reless antenna arrey ~ ~ ~ ~ C 4 vS .120
SVMC
elecammun~cadan Chepter
~ C C C C C C 51 b172 A~less support tower ~ ~ C v~ vS vS C ~C
~ 31 31411 extile manufadu ~p ~
~ 71 711 er, indoor le IQ tQ IQ I~ IP IP
~ 71 711 Theater, outdoor IP IP IP
ue, tecap and retread IP
~ 56 56292 anufacturing
VMC
Iv vyv v2 v~ 51 5179 ower, ham operator vS v§ vS C v~ v* C v2 uS 19 40.11 Q(A
22111 awer, wind turbine svmC
I C v~ v$ vS C va va
2-2 1 4.11 B
8 support
~ 48 4851 ransit center IP IP IP IP ~P ►P ~P ~P ~P
C 72 7213 ranaitional housi
I 44 44122 rtjdc sales, rental, ip iP
2 pair attd maintenance
I ~ 4445 47 ruck stop IP iP
~ 81 81142 Upholstery shop IP tP (p IP IQ
daptlve
se oi
xisting
~ 49 49311 arehousing A ufj A if! iQ struciums•
No
xpartsion
Ilowed.
~ 32 321 ood todUc! IP tP
, manutacturing
SVMC
~ 56 56292 recking. ~~ing, Junk C vS 19. .OBO(B
nd salvage yards ~
~ !Q Permitted Use A Accessory
On
~-•RR Regional Siting T Temporsry
Permit
I vS Conditions Apply CUse porn~ii t'
(Ord. 08-002 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
Department of Communit~- ncvclopment j Planning Division
siw7liZ
City Council
Administrative Report
Amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
October 7, 2008
Department of Community De-relopmeot Planning Division
ne
Proposed Amendments
• Section 19-A (Schedule of Permitted Uses) to allow medieal/dental clinics to locate
in the Garden Office District.
o Chapter 19.30 (Changes and Amendments) Remove item 7 which requires that there
have been substantial changes in an area since the adoption of the code.
• Chapter 19.40.120 (Manufactured Housing) Update the required roof pitch to reflect
what is required by state law and add a provision which would allow the replacement ofi
existing single wide manufactured homes under certain circumstances.
• Chapter 19.40.420 (Residential Standards) Update the matrix to allow for a reduced
duplex lot size, correct the lot width in the MF-1 zone so that it is correct
mathematically, and update the matrix to ulclude information related to the setback of
strructures from a private driveway easement.
• Chapter 19.40.010 (General Provisions) Add a provision which would allow certain
accessory structures to encroach into the required setbacks and add requirements related
to the placement of outdoor lighting in residential areas.
E!!r:VTV4Department of Communit~, DevcloPmena _ Planning Division
Amendments cont. . .
Proposed
• Chapter 19.70.010 (Light Industrial District) Add a provision which would allow
certain accessory structures to encroach into the required setbacks.
o Chapter 19.70.020 (Heavy Industrial Disl:rict) Add a provision which would allow
certain accessory stcuctures to encroach into the required setbacks.
• Chapter 19.60.010 (General Requirements) Add a provision which would allow
certain accessory structures to encroach into the required setbacks and add a
requirement for the screening of refuse storage areas.
Department of Community DeveloPment ' i
,
Planning Division
Appendix 19-A
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Schedule of MUC CMU City Center Garden Office
Pernlitted Uses Office
Appendix 19-A
Medical/Dental P P P P P
Office
r.re~~~i i~.i"w.~•J,
Department of Community Developmcnt
Planning Division
Garden Ottice
1 I _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ r^*_ ✓ ~~r.. ~ . i ~ _ = ~„~,,,~r'`~.'L"~
~ ~ - • t' _
~ _ ~ ~ ~ e~►i~i ~~,,,i~.,, . ~ _ - -
• - ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' . . ~ !
J - - Y ' ~ . ~ ~O' . ~ ~ a
, _ " _ 'i
..,a..{ . T•~.
~.r,., i I ~ ~ ~ _ , ~ ! - ~ - ~c ~ j -
~ ~ , ~ ~ G~ ~ I
, ~ . _i-' 1. ~ , : _ - _
- j •
T.''~
' - ~ S-. - f.,. ea: • ~ ! = 1 ~ 1''
.f, ~ ~ . _ ~ . - ' : I. • '~_1 - ~
• _ ~ ~ •.I _ r•rYO~•~ ~.a
~ • 1 ; y I , . ~i .
,
Department of Communily nc-s-elopmeni
' e
Planning Div-ision
7 ,
~ i = • •
1 • ~
z •'~4~ ~l ~ 1:.
`t'1~~•
.r
.1' •
. 7r l~~ ~
r - ~ ~
1
v•
~ . ~
r .
1
~N
I ~ ~1 ` . . " ♦ « = i1,~K .N~. _ . . ~
Clrr.. i.n.r•.••.n '
06@ne~ Dcparf:ment of Community DeveIopmcnt ='~al in Division
Plana
j g Chapter 19.30
Changes and Amendments
19.30.030 Site-specific zoning map amendments.
A. Site-specific zoning map amendment requests may be submitted at any time. Site-specific
zoning map amendments are classified as Type III development applications and shall be
processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140.
B. All site-specific zoning map amendment reques#s must meet all of the following criteria:
1. The requirements of the Chapter 22.20 SVMC, Concurrency;
2. The requested map amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
3. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare;
4. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive
Plan or because of a need for additional property in the proposed zoning district classification, or
because the proposed zoning classification is appropriate for reasonable development of the
subject property;
5. Property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include corner touches and property located
across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or higher zoning classification;
6. The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the immediate
vicinity of the subject property.
7. Circumstances have changed substantially since the establishment of the current
zoning distrNCt to warrant the requested map amendment; and
8. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole. (Ord. 07-015 4,
2007)
~ 4:ftwr.ti►Cc✓♦
~ Department of Commuriii-y DeveIopmcnt
.Planning Diz-isiuii
Chapter 19.30
Changes and Amendments
19.30.030 Site-specific zoning map amendments.
A. Site-specific zoning map amendment requests may be submitted at any time. Site-specific
zoning map amendments are classified as Type III development applications and shall be
processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140.
B. All site-specific zoning map amendment requests must meet all of the following criteria:
1. The requirements of the Chapter 22.20 SVMC, Concurrency;
2. The requested map amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan;
3. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare;
4. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive
Plan or because of a need for additional property in the proposed zoning district classification, or
because the proposed zoning classification is appropriate for reasonable development of the
subject property;
5. Property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include comer touches and property located
across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or higher zoning classification;
6. The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the immediate
vicinity of the subject property.
j - -
7 _ . - . _ . _ , . H . . !'ei 'l
8. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole. (Ord. 07-015 4,
2007)
Department of Community Devclopmcnt
~ ~al Planning Division
Chapter 19.40-120
Manufactured Housing
3. Comply with all local design standards, including the
requirement for a pitched roof with a slope of not less than
4:12, applicable to all other homes within the neighborhood in
which the manufactured home is to be located; and
3. Comply with all local design standards, including the
requirement for a pitched roof with a slope of not less than
3:12 applicable to all other homes within the
neighborhood in which the manufactured home is to be
1 ocated; and
E CnMMiRIR7t til v "
Departmcnt of Community Development =
j Planning Division
Chapter 19.40.120
Manufactured Housing
C. This section does not override any legaliy recorded covenants or deed restrictions of
record.
A"new manufactured home" means any manufactured home required to be titled under
RCW Title 46, which has not been previously titled to a retail purchaser, and is not a
"used mobile home" as defined in RCW 82.45.032(2).
A"designated manufactured home" is a manufactured home constnucted after June 15,
1976, in accordance with state and federal requirements for manufactured homes,
which:
1. Is comprised of at least two fully enclosed parallel sections each of not less than 12
feet wide by 36 feet long; and
a An existin sinqle wide manufactured home maY be replaced with a unew" sinql_e
wide manufactured home when replacement is initiated within 12 months of the date
of damaqe which represent less than 80% of market value, or removal of existinq
habitable manufactured home.
2. Was originally constructed with and now has a composition or wood shake or shingle,
coated metal, or similar roof of norrttnarl-4± 12 3:12 pitch; and
3. Has exterior siding similar in appearance to siding materials commonly used on
conventional site-built International Building Code single-family residences. (Ord. 07-
015 § 4, 2007).
~TIN~1l~:••_~••~{v ~
~00 . Dcpartmcnl~ of Communih• Development '
j% Planning Division
Chapter 19.40.120
Manufactured Housing
_ -
r!' ~ r
4 h I
r ~ . . _
.1'U!
_
~
Dcpartment of Commua• ~ty De~-elonment : 10;w0 Planning Division ,
12.40.0'0 esidentisl s Ards.
A. Residential development shall meet the minimum area and :etback requirements, and
maximuai lot co e and buildi hei ht re uiremeuts shown in Table 19.40-1
Table 19.40-1 - ResidenciAl Zoae Dimensional Standards (In Fert
R-1 R-2 R-3 R-.s MF-1 NIF-2 PRD
Sinu e F y Lot 40,004 10,000 7,504 6,000 3,600 2,000 IIaderlytng
Area_ker zont
ldIjvelling uj?nsU
Dup x Lot area 6.1700 5.000
cr deve!!m umt
Lot i 80 80 65(4) SO '_4 ` 20 30
l.at Dep 100 90 90 80 80 80 SO
Front and B 35 15 15 15 15 15 15
Misumum Street Yard Sttbeck
2)3
Garage Setback 35 20 20 20 20 20 20
(2)L3]
Rear Y Se ac 20 20 20 20 10 10 15
1 3
Si Yar 5e ack S 5 5 5 5 5 5
(1)L3)
Opcn Spaa 10°10 oss ana
Lot Covetagt 30.00/c 5 0. 0% 50, 0°l0 55.0°10 60.00/a 65.0°Yo 60.0%
MaIM'snum B mg Ha (In 35 35 35 35 40 50 IInderlying
Feet) zone
1 No aaessory atructure shaU e ocate m e or Banking rtreet shall be aet at
not less thaa five feet from any side at rear d
2 Attathe praga, ere e garage or es not e the atmet may sme setback as
the i c i al strvcture.
Setbacks when adiaceni to a privatt toad oc driaewaY easemeat, are established from thc
inner edRSd of the road or ckivewav auid are the same as aoted above excent the ElankiaA
road whtch would be five (S) feet -1-~4tn~4 i_ _~-_~_h-~-•+~i-:.
4 Duptex lots in F_ 3 Lonc> rna be a minimum oF60 feet in width
Departmcnt of Commonit3• nc~~clopmcnt -
j~ Planning Division
.
Duplex Lot Size
Reduced
Siniz e FamilY Lot 40,000 10,000 , 3,600 2,000 Underlping
~a~e zoae
tdDvelling ul-Initl
Dup ex Lot area 6.000 5.000
er dwellin unit
Lat Width 80 80 6 5 4 50 -5,245 20 30
Lot Depth 100 90 80 SO 80 50
Frvrrt an sng 35 15 15 15 15 15
um Strett Yafd Sttback
(2) 3
Garage SetFa-cli- 35 20 20 20 20 20 20
(Z)M
Rear Yard Se ac 20 20 20 20 10 10 15
Department of Community Develcipmcnt
S~'i ne
j Planning Division _
Duplex Lots
: .
~ .
t~ - _
- } _
Dcpart~ment of Communit,y Development
,
~Val Plannin-u Division
Duplex Lots
.
~
_ _ f ,
r j,
f
' ~
. ~ ~
: ~
~ l.TfW1YJ:h'K•
Department of Community nevelopment T
j . Plannincr Division
MF- I Lot Dimensions
T a ble 19.40-1- Residential Z o ne Iaimensio iial Sta ii dai• ds {Iii F
R-1 R-Ale R-3 R-4 AI'-1 NI
Single Family Lot 401000 10,000 731500 6,000 3,600 2,(
Area~er
idDwelling ujjnitl
Duplex Lot area per b,000 53,000
,
dwellin~ unit
Lot Width 80 80 65 50 --c4---14 5 20
Lot Dep 100 90 90 80 80 80
Front and Flanking 35 15 15 15 15 15
m Stre et Yard S etback
r~,t f-1
Depai-tment of Cummunit}T 1)cvclupmcnt '
~
j ; Planning Division _
Setbacks from Private Driveways
Frout and Flankiag 35 15 15 15 15 15 15
Miniazum Street Yard Setback
(2)(3)
Garage Se ac 35 20 20 20 20 20 20
(2)M
Rear Yard 5etback 20 20 20 20 10 10 15
(I)3
Si e Yar Se ac 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
ppen Space 1 0% ross area
Lot Covetage 30.00/o 50.0°10 50.0% 5 5.0% 60.0% 65.0°!0 60.00/o
Mm~ Bw ing Hei t In 35 35 35 35 40 50 IInderlping
Feet) mne
1 No acxessory structure shall e ocate m the oat or flanking street par an shall e set
not less thaa five feet firom any side or rear ard.
Z Attac e garages, ere e garage oor oes not ace e stnet may ave the same se ac as
the principal strvcture.
Setbacks when adiacent to a privatt road or driveway easement, are established from the
inner edRed of the road or drioeway and are the same as noted above except the IIankin~
road which would be five (5) fett. in"°''~- edg-f AF
~~=~t-
('}I~F~. P ~ f:t.~~~I♦
E>:rm DePartment of Community nEl~'e ~>pment Pianning Divisiun
~
.
~
~
~
~
- M
~ _ .
i - ~
- . -
Department of Community De~~clonmcnt -
j~ai Planning Di`ision
Proposed 4-Lot Subdivision
_.._.._I _ _.Lon Road_.._.
~ i
I ~
j 20' Privatc :
Drivcway ~
I -
: Easement I a,
~ Id
N ~ I
I ~
I ~
I ~
I ~
: z
I
;,..~.~'NC~"W• Department of Community Development
S`~~I~a►r~~e~
Planning Division
Chapter 19.40.010
Gencral ProviSions
19.40.0l U General Provisions
A. No principal or accessory structure shall be lucated within thc clear view triangle (Chapter 2?.70 tiVMC:
B. 1n the districts where the height of building is restricted to 35 feet, cooling towers, rooi'gables, chimneys and
vent stacks may extend for an additional height, not to exceed 40 feet, above the average gradc line of the
building. Water stand pipes and tanks, church steeples, domes and spires and school buildings and institutional
buildings may be erected to excecd maximum height requirements; provided, that one additional foot shall br
added ta the width and depth of front, side and rear yards for each foot that such structures cxceed lhe require(i
height.
C. No structure may be erected to a height in excess of that permilted vy applicaUlc airport hazard zoning
rcgulations.
D. Recreational vehiclcs shall not bc used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any residential zone.
Cruests map park and/or occupy a recreAtiooal vehicle while visiting the occupants of a dwelling unit locatrd on
the same lot for not more than 30 days in one consecutive 12-month period. T'he intent is to accommodate
visiling guests and not to allow the mcreational vehirlc to be used as a dwelling unil. (Ord. 09-006, 1, 2008;
Ord. 07-015 4, 2009)
vutcloor Liahtin_~: EknN' [ighLs, whc:thcr t-rec s[andin)4 ur atwchcd to a builuiri,~~ or structure, %~'_IliCll IIIUtIIUIatt: ai,~,
uutdonr area oCa lot, shall be nositioned, placed, constructed; shieided or used so tllat the direccion of the iigiit
is downward and within thenropcrty lines. Any non-conforming_liShts shall hc cliscantinued within a Pt=riod_c,I-
.
,~;1;. ;i~i~;,_l~r;`,'!'-'~~•,
Dcpartmenf of Cummunity Dcvelopmcnt ~
j~al P[anning nivision
. ~ ,
oa ~
I
~r
~
~
~ - -
~
~
•1 ~ I ~ ' ~ I
~ I
.i . ; I
;
~
R~
1, "M"I 't
Department of Commirnity Dc<<elopmcnt ~j'W Planning .Division
Chapter 19.40.01 0
General Provisions
19.40.010 General Provisions ~
D. Recreutianal vehicles shnll not be used a.s permanent or temporary dwelling units in ~
any msidential zone. Guests map park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while
visiting the occupants of a ctwelling unit located on the same lot far not mare lhnn 30 days in one consecutive 12-month pericxi. 11ic intent is to accommodatc visiting ' guests and not to xlloNv the rccrcational vehicle lu bc used as a dwelling unit. (Ord. 08- . ,
a-_-
006. 1, 2049; Ord. 07-015 4, 2048)
F . Outdoar Lighting: Any lights, whcther free standing or attac;hed to a building or
structure, which itluminate any ouldoor area of a lot, shull be positioned, placcd. -
constructed, shielded or used so that the direction of the light is dowrnward and within ~ the property lincs. Any non-conforming lights s6all bc ciiscontinueti within u pcriod oF
i
180 days fram the cfTective date of this provision.
Ilic fi►Ilowing ieaturcs aitachcd to structuri:s are_allat<<cd as cxccptions to the sctbarl. -
:tandards:
R_E_imjr Proicclions Allawcd: Minor 1"eatures of'a structurc, such a.5 c:ayes,
cIliimncys, frc cscaM.s bay windows no morc than 12 fcct lon 8Il(j Wlllc}1
cantilever bcycmd the fo un~neion Qt'thr :~tructurc. covered stain~•a
hrclchair ramps and uncovcrc•d dccks or balconics, may c`ctend into n royuircd
stnicture setback up to twentv nfrccnt of the depth of the setback. I Iowe<<cr, W t ' `-thcy mnny nat hr within thrcc fcet of a lot linc whcn a scthack is rcquin-
Attachcd mcchanicalcguiprncnt such as hcat ntimQs. a ir conditioner - -
cmcrgcncy eenc_r.itors :und_N%;itcr ptimps nrr :illowccl ici prajrct into tlic
rcar sethack onlv.
~
EM& `:r."."`:'•:'.••'• Departmcnt of Communit~- DcveloPmcnt '
%I,L-. Planning Division
Chapter 19.60.010
.
General Requirements
19.60.010 Gcneral Requirements
A. Nonresidential development shatl mcet the minimum setback and the maximum height
requirement shown on lable 19.60-1.
B. Parking areas shall be paved and landscaped in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC.
C. New devclopment excecding three stories in height shall be provided with paved service lanes not
less than 16 feet in width.
D. All new development shall provide for shared access with adjacent properties.
E. All outdoor trash,garb= and reiuse storai-ie are~..~ shall be screcned on all sitles visible to vu
vicws or ridcs-of-ways with a minimum five and one-half (5 '/z) foot high concrete block or
masonrv wall or sight-obscuring fence wiih a sight obscurinp- P-ate ancl two (2) feet of T%
I;incisc~irin<! in acrc}rdance%vith rieurc 22.70-9SVMC'.
~~~11n
~ti, De`~elopment
~ ~ Dcpartment of Commun•
Planning Division
Refuse Storage
. ,
, vw~. .
~rN~M
1 ~ " f Jl ~
~ •
. . _ . . . ~~,i ~+.1~ ~ +'~F
Dcrartmcnt of Gommunitv Devclopment
j'~a11 1'lanning Division
Refuse Storage
~"'lr~~~"'~+ . • „
• _ - - -
. T ~ ' j 3~ - ` 'i
- r.~' ~.s-'--`-~c r- ~A~~~:.%r.
l + ~ ` v •T+~~
-FI~4►.t- . ~t • ~ . , _ v .""3~ I"
~ . ~
.~r
~ Department of Community Devclopment '
oO'
*6 ~
j Planning Division
Ghapter 19.60.010 General Requirements
Chapter 19.70.010 Light Industrial
Chapter 19.70.020 Heavy Industrial
~ Minar Proiections Aliowe~;
Minor features of a structurc, such as eaves~chimncys C~re escapi'S baV windows no more that) feet lur:g anu
which cantilever bevond the foundation of the structure, uncovered stairways wheelchair ramps and uncovered
decks or balconies mav extend into a required structure setback up to twentv percent of the dppth of fhe setback
However, theY mav not be within three feet of a lot line when_a setback is req_uired _
Full Projections Allowed
in addition to subseetion i9.QU.011) if '1 1._1he fnllc:;%•.rm_q teatur(,s xo~ alln,.ved tn~prniert fx_tltier into ;h{-, req~uiref:i
,-iacture setback:
a Canopies marquees awnings and similar teatures may fully extend into a street selback and rnav
ttnd_into the public nqht-of-waY Subiect to the requirements of the building code and adovted streei standa,-u:.
b. Uncavered stairwavs and wheelch~ilr r-,~T~~'~~ ty~?t 'r.-id 1r) c~ rtn enfr-- nri 1ine '1tmPt..{,1r1nt7 f?~-.1drr n1 ;
mav fullv extend into a street setbaCl:
c. Uncovered decks and stairwavsIfi:ll r .111 1, r.,it;
~-~:•-tend into a required structure setback: anr.r
d. On lots tfiat slOpe down fram ihe stfc:4i, vetlirLllar anfl peClestrian emfy UriugiL!~ wat are nu mlure_Ii~x
f1__,r?y-two inches above the averaqe sidewalk elevation mav fullY_extend into a required structure setback.
~ B1Ir:Irw- PY!!?,n,f! nl)hiIr fI'7f1tS-Clt 1,'J=1`~ as :7lTC?'.'dnd_IIl ±}!f` hllftfI(`.g COdf' '7f1CI 3rJOrff'CI StfpF-'
a.
~i,:nr1'3(il~
1 ~11?:lCfl~'Cj Rl('l;h`;fllC:d ~:0~J1(}rllf'(i~ =UO'• "--~'.C~"i1 .":1R'•.(:1:;. "llf (.;G:1dItli:!'lP'_; -:fll~--_fC1PI1C'~ C~~'(1•~C?i(~f~: :If)i
~.'J:"lt~~. ~~.1i11~`'- cl(,-~ 1~If1y','i'!~ t:l Illi~ ~ li' :lilt~ ~~~:?f l';~_ f i!~ii. ~ii1~_,-
`~."""~`•`N~~~` Department uf Cummunity i)cvelopmcnt
Planninh Divisiort
~
~
~ Y
~ ~~i. 1 •
1,1~ ti • , 1 _ ,
.-.r=f~ i ~ _
L • . • * , - ' . ' !
- -
~~.~i~h~L~ _ . NC.' - _
. ~ -
~ .
ir
v
- ,
~J~~ ~ r~.i~i~.,.~vtn.a~f~ • N
~ Department of CommunYty Devclopmcnt
~ Planning Division _
~
, .
i'1 J►
~vqii~ rl 'i, L i.•,., y r ,~.i~'
,Or.OA~,q . . - - _ I
M . _ I . ~ •t_' r - - ~i
~
~
~f..
. .
-
-n•„r.rr..
ent ` ~ ~
Department of Community Devclopm
~~I Planning Division
. Questions?
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7"`, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old buslness ~ new business ❑ public heanng
[J information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legistadon
AGENDA ITEM T1TLE: Proposed Shannon Ave. Cul-de-sac Parking Restrictlons
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACT10N TAKEN: N/A
BACKGROUND:
The City has received a request from the East Valley School District to restrici parking in the
Shannon Avenue cu{-de-sac east of Pines Road. The Schoot District is using larger buses on
that route this year and they have experienced difficuRy maneuvering in the cul-de-sac when
parked vehicles are present. When the cul-de-sac is empty bus drivers are able to complete a
turn-around without additional backing or maneuvenng. However, when vehicles are parlced in
the cul-de-sac, bus drivers experience difficutty. If tfiere are many vehicles parked there, the
district is concerned the bus may have to back out over 800 feet to exit the dead end street.
The Model Traffic Ordinance gives authatty to the Traffic Engineer to esteblish No Parking
zones for distances up to 100 feet. A No Parking zone exceeding 1 00 feet must be authorized
by City Council. The proposed No Parlcing zone in this cul-cie-sac woutd be for 330 feet.
RECOMMENOEO ACTION OR MOTION: Staff recommends that partcing be resVicted in the
Shannon Avenue cul-de-sac to permit the safe and efficfent maneuvering af schaol buses.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Purchase and erection of signs would be paid from the street
fund
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Diredor; Inga Note, Traffic Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Graphic af cul-de-sac.
2. East Valley School District correspondence
i
~l
+ . •
~ ~ i ~ . 41
.
~ -
~ u
~ iJ T~•. . ~ ~ I~' `~f`, ~r ~ ~sA ~
~ I
~ ~I !
~
k♦ 1 •
~
~
M t
M r •
! 11 * ~ ~.'fW
~ ~ 1 ~I. 1..
,
1
` ~ ~
A
I'~ ~_;I ' ~II ` AI,
1 ' ~ 1~1~~_ , ~ .i~~•Jr
.2 ►~i . .
L~~~ III,- + , ~ _
F'.ige 1 «1' !
Carrie Acosta
From: Inga Note
Sertt: Thursday, Ociober 02, 2008 1 10 PM
To: Carrie Aoosb
Cc: Nell Kersten
Subject: FW No Parking request for Shannon cul-de-sac
From: Paul Vigil [maUto:VlgilP@evsd.orgl
Sent: TueSday, September 09, 2008 2:59 PM
Tp: Inga Note
Subject: Re: No Parking request for Shannon cul-de-sac
Correct
Paul Vigil
Transporta[ion Supecvisor
East Valfey School Distric#
2230U E. Weliesley
Otis Orchards, WA 99027
509-241-5902 phone
509-921-7I45fax
"Inga Nace" < inoteigispokanevalley.org> 9/5; 2008 10:48 AM
Paul,
I m working on your request br the Shannon cul-de-sac_ Unfortunately ft exceeds my autt►arrty Eo post disiances
greater then 100' for No Partcing, so it looks like we'll have to add it to our Council's agenda. So t want to make
sure I have the facts straight You are running larger buses on the route this year and are unable to turn around
in the cul-cie-sac (without backing and maneuvering) when there are vehicles parked alang the curb And if there
are too many vehictes occupying the cut-de-sac you may have lo back atI the way out?
Irga
l Or`2i?(1()R
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ,
- Request for Council Action .
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information X admin. report ❑ pending legislation
~ AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appeal procedures for appeals to City Council
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 17.90.090
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEId: The Council adopted the Uniform Development Code
in 2007. The version provided to the Council erroneously identified the rules for appeals of
Hearing Examiner decisions to the City Council as Appendix B, and also failed to attach the
appeal rules. This omission was recently discovered when an appeal was filed, and staff now
seeks to fix this issue.
BACKGROUND: Two proposed changes are being made to the draft the Council originally
considered in 2007. On page 2, please note at number 3 the request to address the procedural
and substantive effect of a tie vote. Similarly, on page 3, number 6 explains how the findings of
fact are treated on a tie vote.
OPTIONS: Suggest additional changes; place on agenda for a first reading.
. A.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place on the October 14 meeting
agenda for a first reading. .
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed ordinance adopting Appendix C(appeal rules)
Proposed Appendix C
~
a
~ ~CITY OF SPOKANE VALLFY
\ - ~ SPOKAa\E CUIJNTY WASHIqGTON
ORDIlqA1vCE NO. 08-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CTTY OF SPQKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTO\, A~NENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION
17.90.090 REGARn .I1i `G CITY COUNCIL APPEAL HEARING PROCEDURES.
«IHEItEAS, the City adopted Spokane Valley Nlunicipal Code 17.90.090 pursuant to Ordinance
07-015 entitled City Council appeal hearing procedures;
RHEREAS; in adopting SNWC 17.09.090, the Appendix where the City Council hearing
procedures were to be identified was incorrectly identified as Appendix B; and
WFIEREAS, the Ciry Council now wishes to correct that error and add Appendix C, the quasi-
judicial appeal hearing procedures, to the Uniform Development Code.
NOW THEREFORE; the C;ity Counci.l of the City of Spokane Valley, V1'ashington, ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Intent. It is the intent of the City Council to provide procedural guidance to
entities that desire to appeal quasi judicial land usc dccisions issued by the Hearing Examiner.
Section 2. Amendinu portions of SVMC 1.7.90.090 relnting to appeals from decisions of the
~ City Hearing Exf►miner. Title 17, Chapter 90, Subsection 090 of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal
Code is amended as follows:
17.90.090 Ciry council appeal hexring procetlures. All appeals to the City
I Coimcil shall be conducted in the manner set forth in Appendix C$.
SecHon 3. Severability. If any section; subsection, sentence or clause of this chapter is for
any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not a_ffect the validity of the remaining provisions of this
chapter.
Section 4. Eff-ective date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after
public.ation of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as
provided by law.
Approved this _ day of October, 2008. Mayor, Rich Munson ATTEST: '
City Clcrk, Christine riainbridge
Appraved As 7°o Form:
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinence 03- Amending S«4C 17.90.490, City council appcgl hcaring procedures Page 1 of 1
APPenciix C
;
The Council shall not consider any new facts or evidenee ouisidc the verbatim
transcript and certified record subuutted by the Hearing Examincr, c:ccept for:
a. Grounds for disqualification of the Hearing Eaaminer, when such ground.s
were unknoAm by the appellant at the time the record was created; or ~
.
b. Malters that wcrc improperly excluded from the record aftcr being offered
by aparty to the hcarine before the Hearing Fxaminer; or
c. vlatters that were autside the jurisdiction of the kIearing Examiner.
1'he Council shall a11Uw the record to bc suppleinented if the oFfering party
demonstrates grouncls for supplementation as set forth in items (a); (b), or (c),
iirunediately above.
i, Any pai-ty requesting that the record bE supplemented shall submit
such request along with the speeitic evidcncc to be offered to the
Council, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the clate the appea.l
hearing was scheciuled.
ii. 'Ihe Council may require pr permit the corrcction of min.isterial ,
crrors or inadvertent omissi4ns in the prcparation of tlie record. iii. '1'he Council will allow the submiital of inemoranda by the
appellant, or a party of recorci ii-, opposition to the appeal, subject
to the followi.ng requirements:
1. Thc appcllant may file a memorandum in support of the
appeal. The memoraridum must be filed no latcr than 12:00
noon on the third (3`d) Friday preceding the datc set by the
council for consideration of the appeai.
2. Any party of record in opposition to the appcal may submit
a reply memnrandum in opposition to the appeal. Any
reply memorandum must be filcd no later than 12:00 noon
on the second (2"d) Friday preceding the date sct for
consideration of the appeal.
3. All memorancia shall bc limited to sta.ti»g why the record or
appliezble laNvs or regulations cloes or docs not support the
decision, and shall not contain any new i-acls or evidence,
or discuss mattcrs outsidc the record; except a,S permitted
above. -
4. The offerina party shall promptly submit a copy of the
`J memorandum or request to supplement the record to the
City Attorncy, and to opposing parties as praciicable.
2. The Council will allow oral argulnent by the appellat[, or a party of record in
opposiiion to the appeal, subject to the follnwing requirements:
a It is expcctcd ttiat all parties can reaspndbly be aligned as either in suppori
of the appeal or opposed to the appeal. Accordingly; all parties who desire
to make oral argumcnt shall conununicate vvith other parties aligned on the
same side of the appea) and attempt to reach agreement in sElccting a
rcpresentative, or otherwise arrange for the allocation ortime allowecl
under these rules ta those in support of or those opposed to the appeal.
b. Qra1 argumcnt shall be presented first by the appellant, follawed by thosE
parties of rccord in opposition to the appeal; and then rebuttal and
surrebuttal. "
c. Oral argument shall be limited to stating why the record or applicable laNvs
or rc~ulations do not support the decision; and shal] not contain an}~ ne~v
facts or evidence unless allowed by Section "1."
~ d. Oral argument shall be lunited to twenty (20) minutes total for the
appellant, and iwcnty (20) minutes total for those parties in opUosition to
the appeal, regardless of how uiany parties malce up each side.
e. Tlie respective times allowed for oral argument above include the
combined time used by a side for opening ai-gument, rebuttal atid
surrebuttal. The lime taken to respond to questions From the Council is
not included in the time allowed for argument.
3. The Council may affinn or reverse the Hearing Lxaminer's decision, or remand it
for furttier proceedings. The Hearing Exaininer's decision will be presiuned to be
correct atld supporteci by the rccord and law. A tie vate on any motion shall
have the e.ffect of affirnling the hcarina examiner decision. .
4. The Cauneil may rcverse the 1-Ieari»g Fxaminer's ciecision, or remand it for
further proceedings, if the appellant has carried the burden of establishing that
one or more of the fallowing standards is met:
a. The Hearing Eaaminer engaged in unlawfu] proccdtue or failed to follnw
a prescribed process, unless the error was hartnless;
b. I"he decision is an erroneous interprctation of the law, afcer allowing for
such deferenee as is due to construction of law by a local jurisdiction Nvich
J expcrtise;
c. The decision is not supportcd by evidence that is substantial when viewed _-i.n light pf the entire record;
d. The ciecision is a elcarly erroneous applicAtion of the law to the f'aeLS; -
e. The decision is outside the autllority oPthe I-Iearing Fxaminer.
5. The Council may•also remand the decision to the Hearing Examiner ifthe "
appellant offers newly discovered evidence that would reasonably have affected
the dccision, hacl it beeti admitted i.n the proceedings before the Hearing
Eaamincr. "Newly discovered evidence" is evidence that with reaspnable
diligEncc, could not have been discovere.d and produced at the time the
proceedings hefore the TTearing Fxaminer were conducted.
6. The Council shall adopt ~%,Titten findings wid conclusion in suppor[ of its decision.
lf the Cotuicil concludes that a finding of fact by the Hearing Fxaminer, upon ,
which the decision is basecl, is uot supported by substantial evidence., the Council
may modify the finding or substihite its own finding, citing substantial evidence
in the record that suppoMS the modificd or substitute finding. In the event of a tie
vete on the proposed i~inclings of fact; that votc shall be considered a fuial action,
the findings shall refleci the sanze, anci the decision of the hearing e_xaminer s}iall
be affirmed.
7. The C4unr•il's decision shall includE a notice stating that the decision can be
appealed within twenty-one (21) caleridar day:~fi•om the date the decisian was
issued; by Iiling a Land Use Petition with the Superior Court a..s provide.d in RCW
Chapter 36.70C and meeting the other provision of such chapter, and that the
decision shall act as official noticc under RCW 43.21C.075.
8. The notice included in the Couucil's decision shalJ also state that affected
property owners may request the Spokane County Assessor fpr a change in
valuation for property tax purposes novN601standing any program of revaluaiion,
pursuatit to 12CW 36.70B.130.
9. The City Clerk shall, within fivc (5) business days from the date of the CounciJ's
decision on the appeal, mail a copy of the CounciJ's decision tn the appellant, tlie
applicant (if dil"ferent that the appellant), any other party who testified or
submittcd a memorandum at the closed record appeal hearing betore the Council,
any person who requestcd noticc of the dccision, and any person Nvho submitted
substantive comments on the application. The City Clerk shall also providE
notic:e of the decision to the Cotuity Assessor.
10. Where the IIearing ExAminer's decision recommends approval of the proposat
and no appeal has been filed withui the tune pPriod set forth above, the City
vtanager or designee shall modify the official zoiung map of the City according to ~
the Hearing Examincr's decision. The modifit,ation of the zoning map c;ompletes
the Hearing Examiner's decision and shall be considercd the final legislative .
aetion of che City Council. Such f nal action; far zoning purposes, is considered
an "oFficial control" of tkie City by exercise at its zoning and planiiing authority
pursuani to Washington law.
~
~
.
` ~ .
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
,4
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business (D new business ❑ public hearing
0 admin. report 0 pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Changes to the fee resolution
GOVERNIPIG LEGISLATION: The current resolution is 07-417 which was passed in October of
2007, and was effective January 1, 2008.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Each year the council passes a resolution to adjust
fees so that most city costs can be recovered for services provided to others. Staff also
recommends the deletion and addition of fees when conditions warrant the change.
Q BACKGROUND: Staff has reviewed the proposed changes and grouped them into three
categories:
1. Additions - new fees
2. Changes to existing fees ;y
3. A cost of living increase on all fees
OPTIONS: Options include: 1.) Direct staff to proceed with an updated resolution; 2) Procsed
with some of the fee changes; 3) Do not make any changes
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff recommends a motion to proceed with
changes.
This item will return to the agenda on October 14, for additional discussion on the proposed fee
resolution.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: An increase in cify revenue (up to $50,000), to cover
increased costs, is expected during 2009.
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
~
I
~ O
PROPOSED FEE
2009
FOR
RESOLUTION
Spokane Valley Council Meeting
October 7, 2008
10/2/2008 ~
. .
i ptr;'
Fee resolutlon changes.....
~
i-
' A. ADDITIONS
1. Special event fee $5 - $50
>;9
- 2. Centerplace
.
+Large conf room $75/hr, $225/half day,
{N $450/9 hr day
+Projector $25/hr, $100/day
.=t +Coffee service $25/service
+Linens onlY $5/table
+Wine glass only rental $.50/giass
;
z+Stage removal $150
3. Planning subdivision/etc. time extensions &
letter $80
4. Preapplication meeting $250
5. Admin. Interpretations $100
, orti2oos 2
,
, . ,
~ ,
O - 0
. Fee re s o lutl on change s.........
B. Changes
1. Swimming lessons from $25 to $30
2. Swim team fee from $28 to $35
3. Centerplace table settings from $2/place to $3/place setting
4. Where some fees reside in resolution
5. Policies "after 180 days planning fees are not refundable"
"plan review fees are paid at application"
"permit fees 95% refundable less 1 hour staff time
6. Fire District fees are increasing 10%
1 Q/2l2008 3
f
ti•
:r .
ti.'. ,M,.''6N•c"
Fee resoluti on c anges . . . . . . . . .
. •
c. I ncreases
`1. Seattle, Tacoma, Bremerton CPI Urban 3 yr avg 3.46/yr
2. Seattle, Tacoma, Bremerton CPI Wage 3 yr avg 3.5/yr
rt 3. Portland, Salem CPI Urban 3 yr avg 2.97/yr
4. Portland, Salem CPI Wage 3 yr avg 2.97/yr
_
M~ 5. City Select Depts in Gen. Fund 3 yr avg 16%/yr
- 4 -
~ .
..•Y ~ : Proposal: 10°/o increase
~
10/2l2008 4
r
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 10/07/08 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that appty: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ~ adrnin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Pool Renovation Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
r
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Authorization of pool renovation contract on
March 18, 2008.
BACKGROUND: The pool renovation contract was awarded to Kilgore Construction in
March of 2008. The renovation work included improvements to all three bathhouses as
~ well as the addition of new water slide at Park Road; a new lazy river at Terrace View;
and a zero-depth entry pool at Valley N9ission.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
;
STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation
ATTACHMENTS Pool Renovation Update Slides
~
~ Ct#y+ of Spok.ane Vslley 7-'0* Par~Cs end Recreatior~ . u a-
~
~
• w
♦ ~l1~:
~
T ` k
. . ~r •
. v~y • 7:. .
~.►!~L-_-.~.•_; -~:~i • rr~~
I ~ - -
- 'r ~1• i
~I
i -
~ ~ -
1
I
~ ~ ~ ' ~
~
~
-
a -
- - -
. . .
~
d I
' =~1 =
' I
~
~ ~ ~ . .
/
' ~ a~ ~ _
^ . ` ~
+r ~ `
~ ~ ~
, s'~~ - -
r
. _
i
- ,
2
~
..m .
• :
~ ~ ° - y ~ _
1 ~ = _ . - r ♦
.r .
"I .
• A
1 !
1
1~'_~.. ~ `=._r •
~ I ` •~l!~ ~ F~~
`f
r.
3
~ f ~ •
• s- ~ .
r _ ~ ` ! { ~
1 .
y' • ~ `f~~ I
y~ir~rtr~ c - 1 - . . jS ~ _ ~r
. _ _ . - .y
: _
_
+ ♦ + + ♦ ~
- ~ I •I ' : !
f
~ . Y
Perk Road Propwty -
:~llev J, ,
z ~ •
~
,
- - -
.
4
_ ' - _ . . ~ . 4 ' I .
- I
MOO&
~ • - ~7 - i. " .
_ _ I • ' 1 1 ,l, .~t•~
l~ ~ • ~ ' . • .
~ r
~ - -
~
i ~~1• "•~'x ~ .
- f, • , , : fc--.,. ~
t - - - . .
5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for. Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : General Budget Discussion
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: In the ongoing Budget process, Deputy City Manager Jackson will continue
the Budget discussion as a further opportunity to receive Council feedback.
OPTIONS:
i -
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTAC H M E NTS
.
~ ~CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY '
Request for Council Action ,
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ~C admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Regional Transportation Projects Legislative Agenda
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Mayor Munson will discuss the Regional Transportation Projects to receive
Council feedback. OPTIONS:
1 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
„l
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT:
k
ATTACHMENTS: Regional Transportation Project Priontization Criteria
.
\
i
Reg7ional riYransportation Project Prioritiization Criteria
~ SRTC has been requested to identify transportation projects in the region whose jurisdictions/agencies
wish to have thern considered for funding during the 20091egislative session t11at begins in January. VVe
have been askecl to provide the top transportation projects in the region that are regionally significant;
shovel ready, and move toward the reduction of VMT and Green House Gas (GHG) cmissions through
the integration of alteniate forms of transportation. '
REGIONAL SICANTFICA.►~ICE (30 points) cumulative
1. Local needs
2. Multi jurisdictiona] needs
3. Regional neer3s .
4. Statewide ,
5. Multi-state '
6. National
P120JCCT REAllXNESS (25 points)
1. Prelirninary engineering and design
2. EnvironmEntal clearance received .
3. Kegulatory pennitting completecl (404, shoreluie et.c.)
4. Right of Way plans completE
5. Final design (PS&E complete)
ACCESS A.NI) 1VIOBILITY (25 points)
l. Vehicular (general purpose)
0 2. Transit acconunodation
3. 13ike accornmodation
4.. Pedestrian accommodation
5. Truck/freight accon,modation (adequate hirning radius)
COl'1NIUNITX SUPPORT (Ecnnoinic Development or Quality of Life) (25 points) .
1. Local jurisdictional support
2. Local business support
3. Advocacy support '
4. Regional organizatinn support (EL7C, Health District, hiland Pacific HuU) .
5. Legislative support
SUFP4RT 1tEDUC'X'ION IiN VEtITCLE MiLES OT TRAVEL ANIalQR GREEN tCUTJSE GAS
I1A'IISSIONS (15 points)
1. Trip reduction
2. Travel time reduction (function of reduced eongcstion delay) -
3. Supports altemative to single occupant vehicle titilization
LOCAL F11\'ANCIAL SUPPORT (Sponsoring jurisdiction or agency) (15 poinls)
1. 0-4.9% match 0 points
. 2. 5-9.9% match 5 points 3. 10-1 Q.9% match 10 points
i---~ 4. 15% or higher 15 poinfs
- 'f FTNANCIAX. Pi.,AIV/STRATEGY NOR FUNDING (15 points) .
1. Nio strategy exists 0 points 2. Can demonstrate a strategy in being developed 5 points 3. Financia] Plan/Strategy is identifed and documented 4. Financial Plan implementation is being implemented and is documentable
~ _ .
Capital Road Projects - ,
v • .
# .r .1Vortli Spokane Corridoy $300 rrcilliora . The Washington Siate Departmcnt of Transport4on (WS.D07) submits the North
Spokane Co.rridor (NSC) projeci for consideration anci prioritization. The proposed -
North Spokane Corridor is Jocatetl in the northeast quadrant of the City of
SpokanE link-ing Interstate 90 on the south with US 395 on the north near WFUiderrnere.
An iciea first conceived in 1946, t}ais project will improvc transporiation safety and
mobility through the Cit}' of Spokane. US 395 is one of 43 High Priority Corridors ou '
the National Highway System: Thc reducdon of trade barriers fluouo the enactment of
. the Narth Anierican Free r'rade Agreement (iNAFTA); the Gcncral Ageeriient on I'ariffs
and Trade (GAT'T), ancl the Canadian Free Trade Agreement (C;FTA) have increased _
interstate and international fi-eight transport between Canada, the TJ.nited States; and
Mcxico. With tllese free ti-ade agreemenls in place, upgraduig US 395 is a vital paY-t of
i.mproving Washington Statc's'econoniic climate, both regionally ancl nationally. The NSC, as a part of IJS 395, will provicle a major li.nk through Spokane allowing tor the
shipment of freight bchveEn die United States, Canada; ancl yle:xico. The NSC will
ultimately providc a scajnless, 60 ini.le per hour, limited acccss corridor. Ttiis pliasE of
the prqject Nvill cxtend an operationa] segment ftom Francis sauth to E-uclid vicinity.
#2 ITS _795 .~.Tatch .Roacl to 1=90 Cheney/S.polrarie IZoad - ~
.Cntercliange $12.5 rriillion , 17hea-e are presently seven major intcrsections and seve:t-al mi-no.r intersectaoias and
driveluays with accass to the 1-iighway along this fve-mile section of lJS .195. As vehicles entEr US 195 througli these at grade intersecLions and inix with the high-speed
traffic they cause it to slow down, consequcntly dimuus2ung the overall trafflc flow. ln
extreme cFises this slowdown contributes to rear end collisions. Vehicles exiting US 195
throtigh the at-gracle intersections also create a safety hazard. T.he overall traffic flow is .
impacted whEn veMicles slow down to turn. This slowing down and merging contributes
tU sidesMpE collisions. .
This project will Elirnunatc the existing at-grade intersections and proNride interchanges at
Hatch Road, Meadowlanc Road and Cheney-Spokane Road. WSDQT is propASing a
"NeNv City Street Network Systern". !"his netwo.rk of streets vNzll allow motorists
altemative routes other than US 7 95 to access Spokane's City Centcr and other local
neighborhoods along US 195. Ihe sepa.ration of thas loca] and regional traffic «Iill
proNritle a constant movement of traffic, wit]i fewer accidents occurring on US 195.
#3 .Rf•irlging the Vulley I3ar•Irer Road Overpnss $25, 740, 000 Bazker Road is a north-soutll pruicipal arteri al in the City of Spokane Valley. It crasses ~
the Burlington iNortberra Santa Fe (BNSF) mainline near SR 290 (!'rent Avenue). x3arker
~ ltoad cuIrently cairies approximatcly 4,290 vchicles per day. The BNSF line cames
beriveen 30 and 50 trains per day. Barker Road lies beriveen the Sullivan Road overpass
and Flora 12oad at-gradE crossing to the west, and the Wellesley Avenue overpass to the
east. Standard rai.l.road gates and signals cuirently protect barker Road. This project will reconstruct BarkEr Road to pass over three BNSE tzacks and SR 290
Trent Avenue). tiVellesley Avenue will be re-routed to convect to the new Barkcr Road, ,
on the south side of the railroad tracks. SR 290 will be accessed Nvith on-and offramps
sunilar to the Sullivan Road i.nterchange_ #4 .Farwell Road Reconstruction - $3,355, 000 ' Th.is project will improve the mobility within ffie Farwcll Road corridor by wiclening,
. reali e, vng portibns of the existing roadway to mcct'Spokane County and `VSDOT's •
stanclfu-ds, and shorte.ning travel ti.mes because oft.be continuous center turn lane. Tlus
sectaon of roadway is the corulecting i•oadway behveen the US 2 and Mead, Washirigton '
and its existing commercial arEas. This project will provide fpr more efficient movement
of traffic and freight that 'will in turn support developme.nt and ze,,ritalzzation of the existing 7vfead and Nozth Spokane coinrnercial urban areas.
#S Pigeloyv Gulch Caryidor .Project - $25, 000, 000
L-~ 1'he 13igelow Gulch Corridor Project wil] consiruct approximately 8.5 mile of 4-lane
roadway with a 12-foot median (alternating ~v7th a center turn lane), meeting current
" dcsign criteria from the intersection of Francis and Havana to the uitersection of Stillivan
and tiVellesley. The comdor.f.ollows the existing alignment of ]3igelow Gulch arid Forker
Roads with two sectaons of ne,,v alignment. One following thc aligiment of WEile Road
on the w,est end of ttte project and one diverging wcst from the exisking Foxke.r just south
of. 7acobs to coruiECt to Sullivan Road behveen East Valley Jr. High aaid Nast.Valley T-Iigh
SchooI. The project includes a grade-sepdrated connection to Fo:rker Road xiorth of
]3ige:low Culch. ,
#6 Old I-90 Bj•idge Pyoject - $3,500,000
7'his pXOject consists of the construction of a netiv bridge to rcplace the existing failing
bridge that is approxiinatcly 600 feet long and will be 45 fect wide. The supersiruclure •
will be framed Nvith precast prestressecl concrete girders and a cast in place deck. The
substrudure will consist of round conerete columns supported shafts or spread footings at
the interior piers as required for bearing and scour. The CEntcnnial Trail, a multi use recreational trail ttiat runs along the south bank of the Spokane R.iver wiU be reroutecl
under the bridge to eliminate the current at grade crossing. Federal funding has been
approved in the ainouut of $14,000,000, or 80% funding, out of a total estimated cost of S
17,500,000.
~ i
~ -
#7 --1-90 YVidenirzg, S'ullivan Road to BayIter Road -$22 million
WSDOT pursuing the expansion of I-90 frorn Sul]ivan to Bar.ker Road because .
• I-90 is a major commule anci travel route for castern Spokane County and North Idaho
,,vith iraffic volumes exceecl'ui- 100,000 vehicles per day. The 1.6-mile Sullivaii to Barker
portion of Interstate 90 is the next widaning project planued as part of ttie.overa117.5-
rnile corricior expansion frorn Stillivan to the Idaho State Line. I-90 is a Strategic FrEight Comdor because ofthe anternaeional a.nd domestic inlerstafe and intrastate trade ihaG it
carries. rreight traffic t1u-ough t}ais corridor is expected tp increase by 30% over the next
10 years. ThE freigYit that is 1iauled wikhi.n t,his coiTidor bas a substantia] market value and.
includes: brain products, household goocls, xetai] nierchandise, metal products,,groceries,
rnail, and lumber. If I-90 is riot expanded to acconunodate growing frEight aiid passeiiger .
traffic, congestion and Qther. i.mpacts will snbstanfially reduce the transportation value of
this critical corridor.
# 8 --'App1e►vay Ext.erision Univef•sity to Tscjiir•ley $24,000,400 - The City intends to implemen/ phased street riehvark improvcments by extending
Appleway Avenue in a tivay tYiat will balavice automobile, trausit, bikc, and pedestrian
needs. The proposed improvements are ititeuded to mashnize ways of rcacking and ,
moving through the corridar and maintaui the circulation systein's capacity to movE
. c4mmuters during peal: hours in a contibtu-ation that complements the enNrisioned land use and development pattern as autlined in the Drait Sprague/Elppleway Sub-area Plan.
Non-Motorized/Transit
#I Fis1z Lake Tyail $1,000,000
In 1991 the City of Spokane acquixed approximately 101i,near miles ofrailroad corridor
. right-of-way fi-am Government Way in west Spokane to Fish Lake, a Spokane Coulity
park soulh af Spokano--seE attachEd vicinity 7nap. An initial phase of construction was
completecl in 1997 when the City paved approximately 3.5 milcs of the trail from Scrabner Rpad to the north. In recent .years, t1ie.Fish LakE Trailhead w*as constructed at
. Fisb Lake as well as the -first segmenl of the Columbia Plateau Trail extencling fro.rn the
trailhe.ad south to the City- of Cheney.
Fish Lake Trail has been identified as an important link in the rcgion's expanding trail
system that once completed will connect the 'Gentennial Trail with the ColumUia Plateau
Trail, a Was}ungton State:Parks ancl Tt.ecreatiou f.acility. .
The Columbia Plateau Trail provides a cormectioii to Pasco, 1Vash., and c.rpsses the John .
Wa}Tne 7'rail, which is a cross state trail conriecting to the Yuget Sound area. The
Columbia P1atEau Trail is complete from die rish Lake Trailticad to the Spokane-Lincoln
County line. 1Vashington State Parks has developf;cl a gravel quai-~y ora the Snake I2iver
and cledicateci the funds fi-om the sale of gravel to the completion of the Columbia Plateau
•
Trail.
#2 Vunpool Expayision $650,000
Spokane 1°ransit is requesting state funds in the amount of $650,000 ($26,000 per van)
, for t~e purchase of 25 vans to cxpand its vaiipool fleet. An expancled vanpoo] program •is
essential to support our region's CTR goals. Vanpool represents a critical asset as part of
an overAll strategy for public Mansportaiion to make a more sigrvficant contribution to
otir CTR afFected worksites and our new Growth ancl Transportation Efficiency Center ,
.(GTEC) i.n downtown Spokane. Forty-five percent of the Spokane County G"TR affected i
. -worksites are i.n low density, ruraUsuburban areas: rr'hese large e.mployers chose ]ocations •
rvith lower property costs and re.mote from dcnsE residential or other' business actiNity.
This philosophy worked ,vhen transportakion costs were relatively low. As fuel piices -
have increased, tbese employers are bEing pressured by their employees to help with the
high cost of pcrsonal transportation. These employErs thcn hum to Spokaiie Transit for a
solufion. In most cascs, van.pools meet their needs_ Vanpools fill a crilical need that is not
efficienkly met•by scheduled fixed-route bus 'service. . #3 Ilybrid:Electric Yellicle Upgrade $4,879,359
~ Spokane Transit is requesting state funds to upgracle the purchase 'of 27 plannccl new
~ fixed route diesel coaches to Hybrid Erectric Vehicles (HEV). This inclucles expansion of
the fleet f.ro.m 1.51 coaches to 163 fixcd route coaches. °[7ie majo:rity of HEVs to be
purchased will be 35'/40' coaches; howEVer, smaller vekicles and 60' articulated coac.hes
are also i.n the programmecl vehicle plan. Withi.u the cuiTent fiuancially constrauied
Trazisit I7evelopment PJan. (TTaP), the vehicle replacement strategy for 2008 - 2013 has
prograrnmed $33,622,910 ($600,000 f.ederal share anci $33,022,910 local sharE) for the
purchase of 78 diescl powered vehicle,.~. T.ra ordex to convert 27 of the anticipatecl
replaccment and expausion fleet f.rom piesel to HEV; the adclilional upgrade cost is
cstimated to be $130,717 pe.r vehicle (ta,Y & delivery included). These 27 vehicles vvould
be cielivered during the 2009 - 2011 biennitim. ThE estimatcd projcct total cost is
$13,861,368 for the purchase of 27 HEV. ThE amount bcing rcqucstcd is $4,879,359
f.rom state funds. This reprESents approximately a GS% federAl a.nd local share and
. approximately 35% state sharc. Spokane Trausit plays a-%dtal xole i.n reducirag fossi] fuel
consumption i.n the region. Hybrid engiiie technology burns less diesel fuel than . conventiona.l liuses, which in tlim cuts Green House Gas (CXIG) emissions. The
specification upgrade of 27 convcnfional diesel buses to T-IEVs is A positive and unporiant
stcp in addressing air quality issues in the region_ The increased use of hybrid technology buses would create greater fuel efficiency and
reducc maintEnance costs for STA. _
#4 Post Str•eet C'enterznial7'r•ail .1'erlestric.r.rVUtility Bridge $4,173, 000
The Post Street Bridgc in clowutown SPokane is a load-restricted vehicular bridge that
must be reconstnYCted or closed as a vehicular bridgE. I3uilt ui 1937, tlle City proposes the
reconstructed bridge be converted to serve as a peclestrian structure that connects tothe reg•ionally significaint Washington/Idaho Centennial Trail at the hEart of the downtotivn
core. The recoustructecl bridge wil] also :provide the support for a new 60-inch se-,ver
utility linc; ,vtuch replaces an existing 54-iilch sewer line ihat crosses the rivEr at die
existing bridge, and is needed-to increase capacity for future needs_ . , Studies
#1-- RTOj•thwest Corinectof• Study $850,000
The Northwest Connecior would provide an arierial road con.nection between north
Spo.kane C4unty and the West Plains area. The prElirnina.ry traffic modeling £or the
corridox shows that it has the potentia] for relieving both present and future ti-a ffic
congesti.on iil north Spokane, SR 291, SR 2, Z-90, the Mcdica] Lakc lnterchange aa1c1
nurnerous norkh/south arterials wittun the City of'Spokanc. , #2 Univer,sity 1)istr•ict.Pedestrian/-Bike J3ridge& Division }Street
Gatewciy/Sh•eetscape $1,000,000 .
The City proposcs to develop a l~reliminary desi~l and en~ineering study o£ a J2ailroad '
Safet}+ Ove.rpass/.Pedestrian Bridge at a cost of $500,000 to conlinue the pace of
developnient of infrastnicturc identified in the University 17istrict Mastcr Plan. This
bridge wil] alleviate safcty concerns fnr increasing numUeis of shidents, faculty, .
employees, xesidents aiid other peclestrians eommutulg to and from the campus. ]t will
amPli:fy pedestrian and Uike ta-affic Nia the bridg6, aud provide connecrivity beriveen the
ca.mpus and the area soutli of the active BNISF railroad. i he railroad's inain trunk lane -for
its east-west ope.racions travels along the soutliern border of the campus tIv-ough
downkown SPokane.
The City is also proposuig to develop a prcliininary design and engineering study of a •
gate«•ay along Uivision Street betcveen 1-90 ancl• Spokanc Falls Blvd, wluch will include
streetscape'improvemenls and enYiancements to t11e railroad viadact. Thc estimated cost
is $500,400 to worl- tlirough the public proccss of developing the concept to the point of
establishing a 30% desigii and cost estimate. Gateway feafures are related to signage in
helpiiig identify Downtown Spokane and signal the start ofunique areas such as the
Spokane University I7istrict. The enhancements to the railroad viaduct and skreeLscape are intended to e.ncourage pedesh-ians to ufilize the corridor betwcen shopping, hotels and
other potential generators of-pedestrian traffic. 1'hz improvements also improve the
qua]ity of visitor's impressions upon entering into the Downtown core area. Tt is also the
uitent of the streetscape to provide curb extensions along Division Street at locations
consistent witb the major pedestilan routes established in the Downtown Plan to provide
and encourage safc crossings along Division Street. #3 Urban Tf•ar.'l.: Millyvood to Spo~.'urie Valley $30000
The Millwoocl -.Spokane Valley rrail is a five-rnile separated pathway ori abandoned
railroad R4tiV and Spokanc County sewer ROW to connect the cities of Spokane, Spokane Valley, and Millwood. This trail «7i11 prnvide a route though much of thc City
.of Spokane Val]ey connecting 2 elementary scllools, a iniddle school, and a high sehool.
• Funding would allow for thc initial research and desigri of this project. • ~ ~ ,
.
Regivnal Transportativn Projects Scared for the 2009 Legislative Session _
Regianal Proj2c# Communi#y Reduce Local $
lieY for Criteria Sigpificance Readiness Mability Support VMTlGFiG Su art Financial Plan Tatal ReGuest
Pro'ects 30 po+nts 25 oint5 25 aints 25 oints 15 ainfs 15 arnts 15 oints 150 po+nfs
Capital Road Pro'ects
0
lZipl!
e
~ Fanvell Raad fteconstructian 10 20 25. 25 i5 95 15 125 $3.355 M
Bi elaw_Gulch Praject 20 20 20 25 5 95 15 120 $25 M
Old I-94 Brid e pro ect 25 5 20 25 15 ' 15 15 124 $3.5 M
1-90 sulrvan co aarker 30 25 15 20 5 p 15 , l9d $22 M ,
A lewa ; iJniversity #o Tschirly ' 10 ~ ~~5- . 10 15 15 ,.5~. 8D $24 M ,
Na~-motorizedffransit
~is~ 51 ' 3. ' - ` IM _ ~ - ~x
~a_n_~~ka ~ ans~m Pra-ra - - - 2~.
Nybritl E IectricUehicle U ratle 10 25 15 ^ 20 10 15 15 110 $4,879,359
Pos# Streek Brid e 25 5 10 25 10 15 15 105 $4.113 M I ~
Studies ~ , ~
- -
NW Coe-tor .ri"~° p~~,;:;~`-~,~-~~,~ _ M..~~~5~.~~..'-',~'•_
•~v y~➢.~i ~~.~dp°I
~U ~j~tr cfTPe's~ian Bnd ~f~2. .~Yi~ . ~ip, ~ ~r~~-~20~ ~ s M
k r.
X'+C~
' 'w =!TTW~~
C~- ~c~~4f ~d S 6Ii3f1B , . 6~~~" k Q y~..~~- ~I~r..~.~ ~ { a ,::H~,~ityp~>, i i~'* c~~ 6P'~.i^ ~1="~.re~-,~,~.,~'~ 4 ,~f.,~:. - •~-sa,~ i~~.:~~ aW:,~~e~~ _~,~:~=n=~ x. , ~
~
I . .
The state legislative agenda far regional #ransportation projects will include fhe tap three capital road projects; #he top #wo non-
, matorizedltrartsit projects, and the top three studies.
DRAFT
ADVANCF AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of October 2, 2008; 10:30 a.m.
Please note this is awork in progress; items are tentalive
To: Council & Staff
From: City Maaager
Re: Draft Schedulc for Upcoruing Council Meetings
Qctober 14, 2008, Regular 1ZcctinQ 6:00 p.m. [due date Monduy, Oct 6]
1. PUBLIC I3EARING: 2009 Budget -1{en Thompsun [10 minutes]
2. PUBLIC HEARING: CDBG - Greg 17cCorinick [ 10 minutes]
3. Consent Agenda: Claims;, Payroll, Minutcs; Re-1,icensing Approval [5 minutes]
4. First R.eading Proposed Interim Emergency Code Ordinanee 08-021- Mike Connelly [10 minutes]
5. First Reading Code Compliance Rclated Ordinance 08-022 Amendment (graffiti) - Cary Driskell [10 minutes]
6. First Reading UDC Code Compliance Related Ordinance 08-023 - Cary Driskell [10 rninutes]
7. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 08-024 to Amend Appeal Procedures - Cary Driskcll [15 minutes]
8. Firsl Reading Proposcd Ordinance 08-025 Adopting 2009 Budget - Ken "1'hompson [10 minutes]
9. Peoposed Resolution 08-021 Amending Fee Resolution -Ken Thompson [15 minutes]
10. Motion Consideration: ArgonnelKnoa Intersection -Neil Kersten [15 minutes]
11. Motion Consideration: Adoption of CDBG - Greg McCormiek [10 minutes]
12. Motion Considcration: 13id AwF►rd, Senior Center Demolition - Mike Stone/Neil Kersten [lU minutes]
13. Admin Keport: Comp Plan Quarterly Update - Grcg McCormick [10 minutcs]
(*estimated meefing: 140 minutes]
Werbiesrttiv, October IS, 2008: AWC Regional Meetrng, Spokane
Doubletree Spokane Crty Center, 322 NSpokane Falls Cairrt, 99201 (455-9600)
~ October 21, 2008. Stuclv Sessinn 6:00 n.m. (due date Monday, Oct 131
1. ACTIUIV-ITEM:'Motion ConsideraCion: Law Enforcement Assessmenl - Dave Mercier (60 minutes)
2. Admin Report: City Center/City Wall Update - Nleil Kersten (30 minutes)
3. Deliberation: Sprawe/Appleway Revitalization Plan Book II, Development Regs. - ScoYt Kuhta (60 minutes)
TQTAL MI\*UTES: 150 rninutes
OctoUer 28, 2008, Regular McetinE 6:00 p.m. [duc datc Monday, Oct 201
1. Consent Agenda: Clairns, Payroll, Minutes [S minutes]
2. Second Reading Code Compliance Related Ordinance 08-022 rlmendment (gratFili) - Cary Driskell[10 minute_s]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 08-023 UDC Code Compliance Related - Cvy Driskell [10 minutes]
4. Seeond Readina Proposed Ordinance 08-424 Amending Appeal Pracedures - Cary DriskeU [10 minutes]
5. Second Reading Propnsed Orclinance 08-025 Adopting 2009 Budget - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
6. Motion Consideration: City Hall Property Sales 1'urchase tlgeement - Mike Connelly/Scott Kuhta [15 min]
7. Motion Consideration: Authorize T3udget for L.aw Enforcement Assessinent - Aave Mercier [30 minutcs]
8. Deliberatipn: Spraaue/Appleway Revitalization Plan 13ook II, Dev. Regulations - Scott Kuhta [60 minute,s]
9. Info Only: I7ept Repnrts (*estimatedmeeting: 1.50 minutesl
Genzral Election Nov 4
November 4, 2008. Sludv Session 6:00 n.m. [due clate Monday, Oct 27]
l. Airport Overlay Propose.d Amendments - Karen Kendall (20 minutes)
2. 4udget Amcndments 2008 - Ken Thompson (10 minutes)
3. Splashdown Contract - Mike Stone (15 minutes)
4. Street Design Standards - Neil Kersten (45 minutes)
5. Deliberation: SpraguelAppleway Revitnlization Plan Book III, City Actions - Scott Kuhta (60 minutes)
6. Info Only: YMCA Aquatics Contract - Mikc Stonc TOTAL MINUTES: 150 minutes
Draft Advance Aoenda 10/2/2008 10:3721 AM Fa;e 1 of 3
t\ILC Meeting Nov 11-1 S. Orlundo. Florida
Novembcr 11, 2008,N0 MFFTING: Vetcr9n's DKy
Novembcr 18, 2008. Snecial/Re:pular Mccting 6:00 n.m. [clue date Monday, Nov lOj 1. PU'BLIC HEAY2.ING: Amending 200$ Budget-Ken Thompson [10 ininutes]
2. Consent Agencla: Claims, Payroll, Minutes [5 minutes]
3. Pirst Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Airport Overlay - Karen Kendall [20 minutes)
4. First Reading Prpposed Ordinance Amenciina 2008 I3udget - Ken Thompson (10 minutes]
5. First Reading 11'roposed Ordinance for Code Amendments - Christina Janssen (20 minutes)
6. Admin. Report: Pipeline Franchise - Cary Driskell [10 minutes)
7. Admin. Report: Tl3D Update - Cary llriskell [20 minutes]
8. Deliberation: SpragueJAppleway Rcvitalization Plan Final Deliberations - Scott Kuhta [60 minutcs]
9. [nformation Only: Cily Hall Design Services -\"eil Kersten [''estimated meeting: 155 minutes]
Norember 25, 2008, NU 1V1EETING: Thanksiliving VVcck
llccember 2, 2008, Study Session f:UO a.m. [due date Monday, \*ov 241
1. First Keading Proposed Ordinance to Amend Comp Plan (SARP Book I) - Mil:e Connelly [ 15 minutes]
2. Pirst Reading Froposed Ordinance to Amend UDC/Adopt Subarea 1'lan & Iviap ($ook In- Scott Kuhta [30 min]
3. Street MasterPlan Update/JUB -Neil Kersten (30 minutes)
4. City Hall Desi&m Serviccs -Neil Kersten (30 minutes)
5. Info Qnly: Dept Reports TOTAL MIi\'UTES: 105 minutes
llecember 9, 2008, Regular McetinQ 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Dec 1J
1. Cnnsent: Claims, Minute.s, Payroll
2. Mayoral Appointrnents: 1'lanning Commission (2 positions) - Mayor Munson [10 minutes)
3. Mayoral Appointments: Councilmembers to Various Commitlees [I S minutes] 4. Secnnd Reading f'ropnsecl Ordinance Amending Airport Overlay - Karen Kendall [20 minutes]
5. Secanef Reading Proposed Ordinance to Amend Comp Plan (SAR.P Book T) -iMike Connelly [ I 5ininutes]
6. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance to Amend UDC/Adopt Subarea Plan & yiap (Book II) - S Kutita [30 min]
7. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending 2008 I3udget - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
8. Second Reading Proposcd Qrdinance for Code Amendments - Christina Janssen [20 minutes)
9. Proposed Resolution Adopting Subarea Plan l3ook 1I1: City Actiais - Mike Connelly [20 minutes]
[*es/imated meeting: 140 minutes]
necember 16, 2008, Stndv Session 6:00 p.m. [doc d9te Monday, Dec 8]
l. Actian Item: Proposed Resolul:ion Amending Resolution 03-040, Banking Authoriry - Ken Thompson (15 mins)
Regular Study Session Items:
2. Finance Hnusekecping Items - Ken'I'hompson (15 minutes)
Decemhe.r 23, 2008: No vleedng - Christmas week
De:cember 30. 2008, Studv Sessiun 6:00 P.m. [ducatlste.iCridASllccil9
1. Tnfo Only: Dept Reports
Draft Aclvance Agenda l Ot2/2008 10:3721 AM Page 2 of 3
Q'xHEIt :E'ENDI;NC ANl)/OR UPC0tMIING ISSUESNIEETINGS:
Aeeessory Dwelling Units (Ord 08-006 modifications)
~ BroadwaylFancher/Concrete In/ersection (2009)
CenterPlace Fee Structure
City Cent.er R.eport to Council
Community Survey; 2008
Camp Plan Amend-Qrtrly Update ( Jan, April, July, Qct )
Comp 1'lan UpdateJUGA/JPA
Cast Gateway Monument Structure ~
Govcrnance Nianual
Impact Fec Request Central Valley School Aistrict
1 T Specialist Classification Resolution
L.egislative Action Conference in Olympia, Pebruary 18, 19, 2009 #
NorthEast Housing Solutions City Membership #
Ovenveightlover size vehicle ordinance (2009)
Panhandiing C)rdinance
Senske Contract y~
Spokane Count,y Prosecutor Memorandum of Understanding
Strategic Financial Plan-laave Mercier
Slreet Standards Schedule
Surplus Items - Ken Thornpson (Jan 2009)
Transportation Benefit Dist (2009) a. T'~tablish ord.; (b) set publie he.aring; (c) draft resolution; (d) ballot Ianguage
'I ransportation Impacts
UDC Code Amendments Title 20 batch
IJse Agreemcnt (Cary Driskell)
Winter Retreat: Tentulive tvpic.s: Irnpact Fee Study
Awaiting action by others; # Does not include time for public• comments.]
`
Draft Advance Aoenda 10/2J2008 10:37:21 AiM Paee 3 of 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
~ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: IndianalArgonne Collisions
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A
BACKGROUND:
City staff presented information on this intersection to Council on June 314 and September 16'"
2008. Staff recommended extension of the median and elimination of the NB left turn
movement as shown in attached option A. Council indicated a preference for signing the
intersection as No Left Turn in lieu of the median. Below is a proposed option that Council
could adopt. We will bring this to Council on October 14'h for a motion consideration.
Alternate Solution
The proposed signage is shown below. We will discuss the recommended hours of the tum
restriction at the Council meeting.
MON. - FRI.
7AM - 6PM
USE .
SIGNAL AT
KNOX
~
Update on Collisions
Two additional collisions of this type have occurred since the last Council discussion. The
collision shown below happened on September 26~', 2008. The second collision occurred on
October 1 S', 2008 at 12:19pm.
•a' : " : • ~ k•' ; j.l.~ ~ ~ ~ ' i i. ' ~ • umiexrenortrn
~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ I ~ ~ r : . . ~ • OVAM7N
, .i.. . ~ , .i ~ . .y7; _i..,!y.'-I i ~ l.~.. M1' . ~_'~~.•I' , ~~~J,~~
' ' I _ . I . i i ' .I_ ._3. ~ . _ ~ .1 . ' i
. . t. . . ~ ~ i. °
. . _ _ .,~f, , ~ l~`~ i:~ j.. .•J" ~ •j•~ . ~ ' •
: ~ • _l..'.. " ' ~ t~ ~ A i- ' ' ~ ' . : ~
. _ . ~ ~ ' r. .j _ ' ' .I : ~ > ) ~ • . . ' •
.T. 1 •jq_1-~- . .~fy1~ i ~Ql.~_~ ..~_r.~_.i.;_ ~ ~ t ~ ~y..-• .
_ ~i . .
. !t • ; " ••e•~ I . • .3...~. ~ ~ ~ t . 3.J..__.r ~ ,
14 ; .1.
~ ~ l t..~ _ ~ ~ r
} ~ 1 t . ~ , ~i , ; E- . , i i ~ ~ ~ ~j I
jr: _i..~ ~ -I_, ~ ~ ~l ~.i: ~ iL~ir/,0%9~Q~ ' i..
'J L.
; ~ ~_i..C~~.l~~ i ; , . ~ J ,.;.j. . ; ~
; + ..s-~ i-.~..~. •
i, ~.~.T:`.` 1
.~..#..i ~ ~ .~..i_- , I_. _ ~ E~ ~ i i. .i.. . j..
_r~
J (.p i-I~.L1,~..'..I: ~..,..1..•„ ; ~
i
z+,'( •L? i . ~;_•.;;:~.a:~` ;:NARRATIVE ~`"i~:itt~.:~?,.s.-
~
aY'
zs' ~
X~~
I CER~IF! VECL►fiQU " p@W,Ty qF i'EAlUF . THE U.YB OFTIi 87A7E Of YlASMIN,~0 TH4T THF FORE3W1Ci 19 Tfii,E!UO COFg!~T. {AQY 9i 2I.61f
_1~~'~~ '
Un ~ a~, ~a~hu.~ ~M m
~
o o~ ~ PLADr,
Comments from Affec#ed Businesses
A second written comment has been received. The attached email from Advanced Dermatology
and Skin Surgery was received on September 17'', 2008.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Extend the median in a manner that would close off
the NB left turn movement but still allow the SB left turn in4o the businesses access as indicated
in the attached drawing.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Construction of the improvement would be paid from the
street fund or Capital Projects fund as appropriate.
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director; Inga Note, Traffic Engineer
ATTACHMENTS:
1. 2nd Letter sent to affected businesses and residents.
2. Response email from Advanced Dermatology.
3. Drawing - Option A
Pubfic Works Department
s~pMaIle
Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 1Qb ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 1 Fax: 509.921.1008 + cftyhaNpspokanevalley.org
,,;oO October 2, 2008 .
Ra: Indiana/tlrgonne intersection '
Daar Spokane Va}loy BusincssJResident,
The Spokane Valley Police and public Works l7epartmenls have been investigating a collision
pattern at tlie intersection of.I.ndiana/Argonne. At nur last discussion with City Council an
September 1&, we Nvere asked to look into options £or signing the intersection. We are sfill
recommending the meciian, buf are praposing an option to restrict the northbound left turns
tiuough signage dw•ing much of the dAy. The sign assembly Nmuld includc a supplemental
plaque directing drivers to "use signal at Knox".
A pubIic conunent oii ttus subject is scheduled for the Qctobar 14"' Ciry Council meeting. Public
testimony Nvill be al.lowed at the mceting. Written comrncnts must be received by October 100'to
be included in the Council packet for their revieNv prior to this meeting. Please provide commonts -
via email to in e c snakanevalle .oq,, or send a letter to Inga Note at the address listed above.
1f you have aay questions, please c:ontact me at (509) 688-0227.
Sincerely, l~• .
Inga NotG, PB, PTOG'
Senior Traffic Engineer
t
.
_ Page 1 of 1
Inga Note ' From: Wendy Stoehr [WStoehr@advancederm.nei]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 12:14 PNI
To: Inga Note '
Subject: Indiana/Argonne Collisions Advanced Dermatology 8 Skin Surgery would like to express'thelr concems regarding the decision to block the
left turn from Argonne onto Indiana. This decision could impact our business at 1807 N Hutchinson Rd,
Spokane Valley, WA.
Perhaps a large sign could be displayed showing the businesses on the back end of Hutchinson so
customers/patierrts can be assured they are on the right track to their destination if the decision becomes final
that traffic will Reed to procesd to Knox and back track.on Hutchinsan to their destination.
Thank you for your consideration, UVendy Staehr,
C13nic Administraior •
Advanced Dermatology & Skin Surgery, PLLC .
1807 N Hutchinson Rd
Spakane, WA 99212
509-456-7414 Office
509-624-0763 Fax
w e ya@advanccderm,IIot
This electronic trunsmissian cznd any documents accompanying thi,c electronic trun.vmi,ccdon may cvntaln '
information that is confidential aj2d/or legally privileged. The informatinn is iyuended only for Ihe aise of the
individuul ur esttity named ribove. If you nre not the interzded recipient, you nre hereby notified thut arry
dz.sclosure, cupying, distrihution or the taking af any action in reliance on or regarding the contents ojthis
electronically transmitted-in,formation is slrictlyprol7ibited. Ifyvu have received this e-mail in error, please
notify the sender and delete this messuge immediately. ,
~
. ~
~
E
i
~
9/17/2008
.
'
. r-~
~1 1l I ~ ~ . ~
r~` 1 2~,~ti I I L--J
ti 1 ~'~'ti I I
~ 1 <<
X
ARGONNE--
-
EteofEaoLAfY 0 - - - - - - - -
Pmpos,d C~daa of Arrhalt
(TeDcSarcvt) / ~rr .41'vpa'dIsto~df
6mlel shadd~r
A-aFntedFegOm
i ~
, • ~ , ;
I I
•P , ~ I I
I/ 2. Llwd ~iIL 2• ALP ona 3►' C$TC I I ~ ~
~ ~i~ I I L _ J
grg Lbrcl. Tac Lone Dc:ign Par W 8-67 Tmck L-- J
h'10 Ana= L947SF
~ artr:.v xi:LF
' Sr.all inlasl-
MU Aera= L295F •
Ajrtd-.w- 60LF .
"-l 3}F:ul*r A~ 17525'
/ \ t un
/ ` .
/
pM ft m, DrvAm BXPCI' Datc?.~ C(ty of Spoka7YP. VCt11ey ~ INOIANA/IUtG6Nh'E NF~IAId
oeer~ae By. _ oalec De rfrrient of PuDloc PJnrks ~ ANPRO~JE~: • S~IEET
yC,~ o3c) F sproguo Avo. suko i06 ~~~RaRe PUBUC W0MCS DIRECIOk a"oN A
FC~'LpNIu,; 1'-5p' SPOKANE VALLEY. 1YA 99206 ~~~e~• LWj HRND TURN AC S - NUI.LMe ~of~
wtncAu: 509 921-1000 y oote:
. ~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
`-=f Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
Z information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Construction award for the Old Senior Center Demolition Project
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council receWed informational memorandum dated
July 21, 2008 concerning an update of the building.
BACKGROUND: This project is located at 11423 E. Mission Avenue at the intersection of
Bowdish Street and Mission Avenue. The scope of the work is the complete removal and
disposal of the single-story structure vwith a full basement, and all concrete foundations and floor
slabs. After removal of the building, the area shall be graded level to meet the surrounding
contour and slope of the parking lot_
~ J Bids have been received and the low bidder for this contract is Larsen Demolition in the amount
of $101,179.36.
OPTIONS: Approve or Reject Agreement RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Award the contract to low bidder Larsen Demolition
in the amount of $101,179.36.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Funds totaling $109,000 are available from insurance funds
received from the stable and senior center damage ~ in 2006. Finance will do a budget
amendment to transfer the $109,000 to the Park's Capital Fund.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Stone and Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS: Bid tabulation form from bids received on September 24, 2008.
J
BID TABULATION - Project No. 0096 Old Senior Center Dumolition
Spokane PROJECT NO. 08-021
,;.ow%11Cy' BID OPENING DATE Septembcr 24, 2008, 11:00 A.M. Local Time
810DERS Englitoere E&tlmato I.nrson'a DernoliUon, Inc, O'Gracly$ Generol Contractinp Modem Homes ConstrueUoe Co.
ALL R@QUIREt7 SUB1dITTALS YES YES YES
Total Inctuding
8.6% Salcs Tax 8 Total Inciucling Toful lncludinp Tatal Including
item q D@SCfI tion Unlt Q Pr{ce Contin en Unit Price 8.6% Saloa Tax Unit Rrice 6.6% Sates Tax Unit PAto 9.6% Salos Tax
1 Old Senior Ccntcr DemoLilfon end Dis osel L.S. LS. 8 148,751.10 $ 107,179.39 $ 105,179.39 S 105 542.00 $ 105,342.00 $ 112,500.00 S 112.500.00
TOTAL $ 148,751.10 E 101,179.39 $ 105,342.00 $ 112.500.00
F ~ t
_ . , . .
.
0 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: October 7, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑x information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Emergency Code Amendment for Title 20
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Title 17.80.140
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Community Development Department will be bringing forward an
emergency code amendrnent to amend Chapter 20 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Staff
has discovered that there is a required standard of survey accuracy that is onerous, expensive
and to our knowledge, only one local survey company is set up for. We are also proposing to
remove the requirement to submit an electronic map for preliminary subdivisions since 'rt is not
necessary at this stage of the development. Please see John Hohman's attached memo for
~ more information. OPTIONS: N!A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None requited at this time.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None -
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Senior Development Engineer .
ATTACHMENTS: ~
: ~
1'age 1 of 1
Carrie Acosta
From: Kathy McClung - Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 3:15 PM
To: Chris Bainbridge; Carrie Acosta .
Cc: Deanna Griffith
Subject: FW: Interim Emergency Titie 20 Code Amendment
Attachments: 20.40.010 final submittal 10-2-08.doc; 20.30.020 contents of application 10-2-08.doc
From: John Hohman
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 2:10 PM
To: Mike Connelly
Cc: Deanna Griffith; Kathy McClung; Greg McCormick; Lori Bariow
Subject: Interim Emergency Title 20 Code Arnendment
Mike,
The attachments contained a strike-through version of Title 20 as we discussed. The elimination of the provisions
in 20.30.020 and 20.40_010 will allow us to process preliminary and final short plats, plats, and binding site plans
without the onerous surveying and electronic submittal requirements. As currently written, fhe code requires all
preliminary and final subdivision maps to meet precision standards that are not attainable by the development
community and have little vafue in our process. The standard requires boundary points for corners to be located ,
by global positioning system (GPS) to the high accuracy rzference nehvork (HARN) or the high precision geodetic ,
network (HPGN) standards. To our knowledge, only one Iocal surveying firm has the capability to perform this
work. They have indicated that this level of precision would add approximately $50,000 to the average surveying
costs associated with subdivisions. The requirement is not necessary and does not benefit the City or the
development community in any way.
In addition to removing the accuracy standards, we are also proposing to remove the electronic submittal
requirements for preliminary subdivision maps. We have no need for the electronic submit4al at t:he preliminary
plat stage_ We vrill maintain the requirzment for final maps. At this time, a PDF of the map will meet our needs.
The interim emergency code amendment is necessary because we have several short plats and binding site
plans ready for final signature that can't be processed since they have not met the accuracy standards. We are
currently working on a revised Title 20 but this process is expected to run through the first quarter of 2009 and will
not be a timely fix for these existing projects.
Than ks,
John Hohman
\
1oi2r2oos