2008, 09-23 Regular Meeting
AG F:YDA
SPQkANF: V4LLEl' CIT1' CC)UNCIL
REG[JI..AIZ MEETINC
Counril Mccting #145
Turadxy. Septrmbcr 23. 2008 6:00 p.m.
Spokane VAUcy Cih, 11211 C'ouncil ChAmbers
11707 E Spruguc Avrnue
Cuunrl! Requtst.s P/rutie Silence Your Cr!! Phvnrs During C'aanc!! Meedng
CALL Tv URIIE:R:
INVOCATIOti: Pastor Yctrr Gayditrthi, Gcx!'s k:mbassy l'hur1i
Y[.EDCE OF AI.LEGiANCE:
ROLL CAI.1.:
aPPROtiYAi, QF AGENb4:
i\TRODUCTIOti OF fif'ECIAI, GLIE.STS AND PRFSFNTAT1015:
COMtiiI`ITEE. BOARD, LiA1SON SUN1!Vl4R1' RFPOR'I'S:
NIAYOR•S REPURT:
PtiBLIC CONIl►SENTS: Tliis is an appvttunity Cor the public to speak on anysubjcct not on the agrnda
tor action. When you uimc tu the podium, pleasc statr yaur namr and a(ldrzss for dsr rerAitd nnd limit
rvmurf:s ta three minutrs,
1. CONSF.N'T AGFtYDA: Cunsists of itrms cunsidc:rt-Y1 riiutine H'hich arr appruved ns agruup. A
Cttiuncilmrmter muy r+cmrnc an itcm frnm the Carsrci( Agcndn to tx considcrrd scparatch .
u. Appcuvul vf the tollowing C'laim VnucherL:
' UUCNEft IJS'T VC)l1CFIL•R #s 1UFAL VC)UCE{ER ~
i I)ATE AMOlJN7 I
9-11 -2008 . 15345 -15451 ~'_',3b9,R?8.91
.
~ I CRANU T4TAL $2?69.828.01
b. Pavr+oll tor pay pcrial ending September 15. 2008: $236,22.80.6 i
c. Res~.~lutinn 08-018 Setting Plunning Cummission Struet VBwiiun Hr.aring
d. Resolution 08•014 Dutgbusc Adniinistrutar Position
e. Approval of Council Study Scssion Meeting Mir►utcs of Scptemt►cr 2008
f. ApExoval of Cuuncil Cxctiuiivc Sti;i+m k4cc-ting Minutss of S~,•ptcmhcr 16, ?I}US
NEVV BIISINE.SS:
2 . Src:ond Rcading Propnsad Urdiruuicc 08-019 Tax Cunfinnotion - Kcn Thompson (publlc cammentJ
2
3_ Sccotxl Rcadiug ['ruposed Ordituutcc 08-020 I'ruprtl} 'fax - Kcti "mompson Ipubltr comment)
4. Praposec! Rcsolutiun 08-020 Flex Timc Filot Frogram -lahn Whitcficaci Ipubtir rnmmcntl
p(.1a1,1C C01ihlEN't'S This is en oppnrtunity for the public to xpenk on any subjc..i nut on the 4,cnda
fc>r aztinn. Nk'hcn vczu cnmc to I.hr pociium, plcast stgtr your nairic ena addrrss for the rctord and limit
remurks tn lhree minutes.
Cuun:il Agcndo 09•2.i•1% itckulnr MccUng 2
Ai.)NilNitiTR.4'1'IVF RF.,FOItTS:
5. fce Rcsolution Uigt;wsian - kert Thumpson
6. Communih° [kvclopmcni F31ock- (;rant (CDBG) Ch-eniea -(;rcg McC:cytmick
llEL[BFR.AT!(7ti:
Spns;ueJJ1pPletva% itevitalir3tiom Plan. Rook il [)evelopmrn: Rcs;ul,ttians 1wtt Kulit:i
1NFURNi.►z'1ON ON1,1':
8. ChE!artmrnt Kep-ort±
AnJrnzRNnIr.NT
Fc'TUWE sc HcvucE
Rcgulwr Cvkncil:ltcelings urt gtnera/lv lirld Znd ond Illr Tucsdays, beginning nt 6: 00 n.ns.
C'nlmei/ Studf' Sec.viorr_s nre•gcnerul!►- lreld l.ir, _irJ, anJ S!h Tursdut•.+, bc•gIpRI1fg a16:f111 p.nt.
N(_IFIC[ . ~(t,l\1~I1L1~~ [l~.tll(U11~ ~U ~IIli:li~ S~~C f7Cl'1~'1i: NfN~ 7C:,::IiC ~~'~~CI:~ il.~-,1•.':tl:i. hl (~l:~~f7lRi~li~S:C ~1~:\-~li~l~. ~IC.lilil~., l`[ N.~iL'i
iiripnirrncnts. plrstir .nnr.ut thc ('ity C'Irrk ut (irrl i,721-1000cts w;m a• p,,..;ihlr u, thni arraqrnwiu mn), hc tnal-
,
kctiti:lij \Iro:n{? i'Iut ' o( _
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
;
" Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: 9 consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers:
BACKGROUND:
VOUCHER LIST DATE VOUCHER #s TOTAL VOUCHER AMOUNT
9-11-2008 15345 - 15451 $2,369,828.91
GRAND TOTAL $2,369,828.91
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve claims for vouchers as listed above.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson
ATTACHMENTS Voucher Lists
~
;
vchlist Voucher List P9ge: 1
0911112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoicc PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15345 913/2008 000001 SPOKANE C0. TREASURER Aug QR AUG 08: SHERIFF SERVICES 1,158,867.73
Total : 1,158,867.73
15346 9/312008 000001 SPOKANE CO. TREASURER Aug OS AUG OS: SERVICES 203,754.52
Tota I : 203,754.52
15347 913/2008 000633 WCPDA Registration 08 CONFERENCE: MCCLUNG 175.00
, Total : 175.00
15348 9/3J2008 000633 WCPDl1 Registration 08 CONFERENCE: MCCORMICK 175.00
Total : 175.00
15349 9/3/2008 001798 R`D ENGINEERING 1005 MISC RF_PAIRS: 32809D 1,044.50
Total : 1,040.50
15350 9l4J2008 001606 BANNER 13ANK 4441 JUL 08: VISA 1,249_69
Total : 1,249.69
15351 9J4/20138 001606 BANNER BANK 4433 JUL 08: VISA 973.82
Total : 373.82
15352 ' 9/412008 001606 BANPIER BANK 4441 AUG 08: VISA 1,916.57
Total : 1,916.57
15354 9/5/2008 001598 KNIFE RNER Pmt #5 41953 APPLEWAY AVE CONSTRUCTIOId 594,875.91
Total : 594,875.91
15355 9l5J2008 000313 INLAND ASPHAL7 COMPANY INC. PMT #1 42102 PROJ #005 - PINES/MANSFIELD CC 261,012.63
Total : 261,012.63
15361 9/9/2008 001606 BANNER BANK 4433 CC: VISA 2,272.19
Total : 2,272.19
15362 8/10/2008 001606 BANNER BANK 4342 CC: DENENNY 2020
Total : 20.20
15363 9/10/2008 001646 BANNER BANK 4383 CC: WILHfTF_ 50.68
Page: 1
vchlist Voucher List page: 2
09111l2008 1:04:551PM Spokane Valiey
Bank codc : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
15363 911012008 001606 001608 BANNER 13ANK (Continueti) Total : 50.68
15364 9/10f2048 001606 BnNNER BANK 4474 CC: THOMPSON 20.20
Total : 20.20
15365 9/10f2008 a01606 BANIdEF2 BANK 0638 CC: GOTI-IMANN 425.00
Total : 425.00
15366 9/1012008 001606 BANNER BANK 4391 CC: MERCIER 75.10
Total : 75.10
15367 9/10/2008 001606 BANtdER BANK 4367 CC: AAUNSON 46.69
Total : 46.69
1536$ 911112008 001668 ALDWORTH, CRAIG Expenses PROJECT EXPENSES REIMBURSEI 83.03
Total : 83.03
15369 9/11/2048 001810 ALLISON, TONYA Refund REFUND p/1MAGF_ DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15370 911112048 000135 /1PA Membership MEMBERSHIP: L 13nRLOW 230.00
Total : 230.00
15371 9/1112008 007807 APOLLO COLLGCE Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50A0
Total : 50.00
15372 9/1112048 000030 AVISTA 410069444 ` JUL 08: MASTER BILI.INC 28,315.71
Totat : 28,315.71
15373 9/1112008 001372 13ATES, NANCY Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15374 911112008 001799 13ENNER, hAEAGAN Refund REFUMD DAMAGE DEPOSIT 200.00
Total : 200.00
15375 9J11/2008 001801 DENTHAGEN, JEAN Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSI7 50.00
Total : 50.00
15376 9/11/2008 001409 BEST UNE 053108072008 AUG 08: CP ANSWVERING SVC 23.90
Page: 2
; ;
• \
~ 1 \
vchlist Vaucher LiSt Page: 3
09111/2008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15376 9111/2008 001909 001449 13FST LINE (Continued) Total : 23.90
15377 9I11/2008 000173 BINGAMAN, GREC 3rd Gltr Cell 3Rp QTR 08 CELL ALLOWANCE 105.00
Total : 105.00
15378 9111/2008 001842 BINSFIELD, CINDY & TROY Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15379 911112008 000168 BLACK BOX NEM/ORK SVC 161911 SERVICE CALL CP 145.52
152585 SERVICE CALL• CP 559.83
Total : 705.35
15380 9111/2008 004918 BLUE RIBBON LIMEN SUPPLY INC 8943207 UNEN SERVICE: CP 345.98
Total : 345.98
15381 9/11/2008 001812 CHAMPLIN, JEFF Refund REFUND DAtv9AGE DEPOSIT 480.00
Tota I : 480.00
15382 9111/2008 000379 CITY OF SPOKANE WALLEY Petty Gash REPLENISH PE'1'fY CASH 6.23
Total : 6.23
15383 9/11/2008 000109 COFFEE SYSTEAAS INC 62744 COFFEE SERVICE: CP 183.00
62745 COFFEE SERVICE: CITY WALL 283.67
63075 COFFEE SERVICE: CITY HALL 186.00
Total : 632.67
15384 9/1112008 000326 CONSOLJpATEO IRRIGATION #19 05859.0 AUG 08: UTILITIES 106.02
06377.0 AUG 08: UTILITIES 52.60
06377.2 AUG 08: UTILITIES 569.51
11534.2 AUG 08: UTILfTIES 25.67
11982.2 AUG 08: UTILITIES 1721
11983.2 AUG OS: UTILITIES 21.22
11984.2 AUG 08: UTILITIES 19.77
124822 AUG 08: UTILITIES 57.88
12483.2 AUG 08' UTILITIES 25.88
124842 AUG 08: UTILITIES 42.87
Tota I : 938.63
Page: 3
vchlist Voucher List Page: 4
0911112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Vailey
Bank codc : apaank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15385 9/11/2008 001754 CUS70M TRUCK 32322 WINDOW T1N71NG: CD 65.16
32323 WINDOW TINTING: CD 108.60
Total : 173.76
15386 9/11/2008 000683 DAVID EVANS & ASSOCIA7ES 251608 SHOP qRAIN: PRECINC7 434.50
Total : 434.50
15387 8/11/2008 001603 DEMPSEY, ROSE 3rd Qtr Cell 3R17 QTR 08 CELL nLLOWANCE 135.00
Total : 135.00
15388 9/11/2008 600060 DENENIdY, 121CHARD 3rd Otr Cell 3RD QTR 08 CELL ALLOVWANCE 135.00
Mileage TRAVEL EXPENSES 346.65
Total : 481.65
15389 9111f2008 000693 DEPT OF INFO SERVICES 2008070207 JUL UB: hAASl'ER UCENSE 22.57
Tota I : 22.57
15390 9111/2008 001280 DEP7 OF LICENSING 23201 0036449 ENGINEERING LICENSE: WOHMAN 116.00
Total : 116.00
15391 9/11/2008 001800 DEWOLF, Al1AJA Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 200.00
Total : 200.00
15392 9111/2008 001683 DOC - CORRrCTIONAL INDUS7121ES WCCW01033 SUMMER CARAP SHIR7S 2,069.27
WCCVI101046 SUMMER CAMP SHIRTS 53.21
Total : 2,122.48
15393 9l1112008 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATEI2 DIST #1 09006100 AUG 08: UTILITIES 561.81
09026100 AUG 08: UTILI7IES 263.14
09066100 AUG 08: UTILITIES 317.17
09078100 AUG 08: UTILITIES 331.93
Total : 1,474.05
15394 9/11/2008 000106 FEDEC 2-831-94618 SHIPPING SERVICE: CD 37.17
Total : 37.17
15395 9/11/2008 000010 FEDEX KINKO'S 28930145784 POOL BROCHURES: SW 488.70
Page: 4
~ • -
.
~
Ji
vchlist Voucher List Page: 5
0911112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescrlpUonlAccount Amount
15395 9111/2008 000010 0a0010 FEp EX KINKO'S (Continued) Total : 488J0
15396 9/11/2008 001805 FELTON, DULCEY Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 200.00
Total : 200.00
15397 9/11/2008 001804 FLETCHER, AMANDA Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15398 9/11/2008 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 30788 LEGAL AD: CITY CLERK 96.35
30790 LEGAL AD: PLANNING 94.35
30791 LEGAL AD: Pl./aNNING 87.55
. Total : 278.25
15339 9/11/2008 001813 GEIGLE, LESLIE Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 188.00
Total : 188.00
15400 9/11/2008 000839 GENERAL FIRE EQUIP CO 0020591 SERVICE CALL: CP 28322
Tota I : 293.22
15401 9J1112008 001794 GOLD SEAL PLUMBING 0762252-IN REPAIRS: CP 1,185.31
0764259-IN WA7ER LINE REPAIR: PRECINCI' 553.09
Total : 1,738.40
15402 911112008 001253 GORDON THOM/1S HONEYWELL G8042 AUG 08: LOBBYIS7 SERVICES 2,228.25
Total : 2,228.25
15403 9/11/2008 001009 GO7HMANN, WILLIAM 3rd Qtr Cetl 3RD QTR 08 CELLALIOWANCE 135.00
Total : 135.00
15404 911112008 000007 GRAINGER 9698569853 41825 MEASURING WHEEL & STAND 126.82
9698569861 41925 CAULK GUNISIUCONE 12.17
Total : 138.99
15405 9111/2008 001809 HOLMES, DEBRA Refund REFUND D/1MAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15406 9/1112008 000741 HONEY BUCKETS 0779732 AUG 08: MIRABEAU PKY 151.40
Total : 151.40
Page: 5
vchlist Voucher List Page: 6
09/1112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valiey
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO #t Description/Account Amount
15447 9/11l2008 000642 INLAND NW CAP/IARO CLUB Refund REFUND DAMAGF_ DEPOSI7 250.00
Total : 250.00
15408 9/11I2008 OOa655 IM'L CODE COUNCIL: RENEWALS Ntembership ICC CER7IFICATION: R 6E80UT 70.00
Total : 70.00
1.ri409 9111/2008 001808 LAGGnRT, ANDREA Refund REFUND DAAAAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15410 9/11/2008 001806 LEE, ARLENE Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15411 9/1112008 001669 MARTIN, MnRY KATE Expenses MILEAGE 81.90
Total : 81.90
15412 9/11/200E 001814 MAYFIELD, DENISE Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 204.00
Total : 204.00
15413 9/11/2008 000069 MERCIER, qAVID 3rd Qtr Cell 3RD QTR OS CELL ALLOWANCE 135.00
Ecpenses TRAVEL EXPENSES 326.09
. Total : 461.09
15414 9111/2008 000258 MICROFLEX INC. 00017959 JUL 08: TAXTOOLS SOFTWARE 342.26
Total : 342.26
15415 9/1112008 001811 A400RE, LIBBY Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15416 9/11l2008 000062 MUtdSON, RICHARD 3rd Qtr Cell 3RD QTR 08 CELL ALLOWANCE 135.00
Expense 7RAVEL EXPENSES 111.15
Total: 246.15
15417 9111l2008 001803 MURRAY, BRIAN Refund REFUND D1IMAGE DEPOSIT 250.00
Total : 250.00
15418 9/1112008 001485 NARVRE, INC Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSI7 60.00
Total : 50.00
Page: 6
, .
vchlist Voucher List Page: 7
0911112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15419 9/11/2008 000662 NATL BARRICADE & SIGN CO 60945 41927 DELINEATOR POST/BASE 276.12
60946 41927 REPUICEMENT BULBS 26.88
Tota I : 303.00
15420 9/11/2008 001035 NETWORK DESIGN & MANAGEMEN7 16200 SEI2VER REPAIRSIMAINI' 2,242.50
16201 JUL OS: SERV'ER MAIN7 2,734.00
16207 MISC SERVER MAINTENANCE 3,736.93
16237 3RD QTR BILLING 1,047.00
16254 WP STORAGE W012KS 1,274.42
16285 AUG 08: SERVER AAAINT 3,087.50
Total : 14,118.35
15421 9/11/2008 000239 NORTf-(WEST 13USINESS STAMP INC. 70213 CODE STAMPS: CD 64,07
Total : 64.07
15422 9111/2008 000121 NORTHWEST MAILING, INC 60145 ANNUA1.. MAIIdT: IJpS 608.16
Total : 608.16
15423 9111/2008 001490 NW BRITISH CLASSICS Refund REFUND DAMAGE Drl'OSfT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15424 9/11/2008 001634 ORSAK, V'UHITNEY Refund REFUND DAMAGE DEPOSIT 50.00
ToL31 : 50.00
15425 9111/2008 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPrR 100357 COPY PAPER 1,480.22
.
Tota I : 1,480.22
15426 9111/2008 001338 PASSMORE, SUSAN F_xpenses TRAVEL EXPENSES 18.94
Total : 18.94
15427 9l11/2008 000119 PIP PRIIdTINC INC. 1330041996 BUSINESS CARDSfNAME PUITES 347.39
Tatal : 347.39
15428 9/1112008 001815 POS7 FALLS AREA Niembership 2008 MEMBERSHIP DUES: CENTEF 225.00
Total : 225.00
15429 9/11/2008 000827 PROJECT JOY SEtdIOR ENTERTAINER 100pm Performance NORTH HILL BRASS TRIO PERF012 35.00
1130am PerformancQ ALLA CAMERA PERFORMANCE 35.00
Page: 7
vchlist VouCher List Page: 8
09111/2008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15429 9/1112008 000827 000827 PROJECT JOY SENIOR EtdTER7AIN (Continued) Total : 70.00
15430 9111f2008 000322 QW[ST 509-926-1840 1946 PWONCS: PARK RD POOL 101.79
Total : 101.79
15431 9l11/2008 000064 SCFIIMMELS, GARY 3rci Qtr Cell 3RD QTR 08 CELL ALLOWANCE 135.00
Total : 135.00
15432 9/11/2008 000709 SENSKE LAWN & TREE CARE INC. 2822512 AUG 08: CEIdTENNIAL TRAIL 1,977.28
2822513 AUG 08 LAWN CARE: CP 50,795.38
3052926 LAWN CARE: PRECIPICT 42.35
Total : 52,815.01
15433 9/11/2008 000935 SERVICE PAPER CO 30433267 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CP 123.28
30433379 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES: CP 81.94
30433549 JANITORIAI_ SUPPLIES: CP 51.14
Total : 258.36
15434 9/11/2008 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICF 0020509 RECOl2DING FEES: CD 152.00
0023235 RECORDING FEES: CD 98.00
0024272 RECORDING FEES: CD 49.00
0024546 RECORDING FEES: CD 479.00
0024960 RECORDING FEES: CD 191.00
0025524 RECORDING FCES: CD 65.00
0025529 RECORDING FEES: CD 98.00
0025704 RECORDINC FEES: CD 186.00
• Total : 1,318.00
15435 9/11/2048 04aa90 SPOKANC CO. INFO SYSTEMS 54342930 JUI_ 08: GIS BILLING 16,682.56
Total : 16,682.56
15436 9111/7-008 000324 SPOKANE CO. WATER DIST. #3 170-0040-03 AUG 08: UTILITIES 306.65
475-1495-00 JUL 08: UTILITIES 69.33
Tota I : 375.98
15437 9/1112008 000939 SPRAGUE & SULLIVAN MINISTORAGE 47996 SEP QS: RENT 123.00
Total : 123.00
Page: 8
j
_ \
vChlist VouCher Llst Page: 9
0911112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15438 9/11/2008 000311 SPRINT SPECTRUIIA, L,P. 326088106-009 AUG 08: WAPS 557.59
Total : 557.59
15439 9/11/2008 000773 STUD10 CASCADE, INC. 1385 SARP: CD 510.00
Total : 510.00
15440 9111/2008 001250 SYTE NET SERVICES 6247 NETWORK CABLE INSTALLATION 43022
Total : 430.22
15441 9l11/2008 000063 TAYLOR, S7EVE 3rd Qtr Cell 3Rp Q7R QB CELL ALLOWANCE 135.00
Total : 135.00
15442 9/11/2008 001464 TW TELECOM 02367814 INTERNETlDATA LINES: CP 912.98
Total : 912.98
15443 9/11/2008 001529 U-HIGH BANp PAREiJ7 ASSOC Refund REFUNp DAMAGE AEPOSrT 50.00
Total : 50.00
15444 9111/2008 001077 V.H. SERVICES, INC. 10291 SERVICE: 06769D 231.86
Toral : 231.86
15445 9/11/2008 000167 VERA WATER & POWGR 0005-016348.01 JUL 08: U7ILITIES 3422
0006-033021.00 JUL 08: UTILITIES 21.63
0007-017753.01 JUL 08: UTILI7IES 16.59
000&010790.01 JUL 08: UTILITIES 2124
0010-003488.01 AUG 08: UTILITIES 48.62
0011-010826.01 AUG 08: UTILITIES 39.93
0012-004137.02 JUL 08: UTIL171ES 65.12
0013-032589.01 AUG 08: U7ILITIES 41.67
0018-031941.01 AUG 08: UTILITIES 21.76
0018-032752.00 AUG 08: UTILITIES 20.71
0030-031942.01 JUL 08: UTiLITIES 22.32
. Total : 353.83
15446 9/11/2008 001618 VIKING CONS7RUCTION Refund RF_FUND BLDG FEES: 0$-1998 2,456.07
Total : 2,456.07
15447 9111120U8 Q61797 VPCI 00008473 LASERFICWE: BAINSRIDGE 350.00
Page: 9
vchlist Voucher List Page: 10
0911112008 1:04:55PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # Description/Account Amount
15447 9111/2008 001797 VPCI (Continued)
00008473 I../1SERFICHE: BINGAMAN 575.00
Total : 925.00
15448 9/11/2008 000038 WASTE NiANAGFMENT OF SPOKl1NE 0043531-2681-8 WEEKLY TRASH SERVICE: CP 66.63
2244119-2661-5 WEEKLY TRASH SERVICE: CP 624.55
Total : 691.18
15449 9/11/2008 000417 WES7GRPl DANCE ASSOC Refund REFUND DAMAGE pEPOSIT 250.00
Total: 250.00
15450 9/11/2008 000061 WILMITE, DIANA 3rd Qtr Cell 3RD Q7R 08 CF_LL ALLOWANCE 135.00
Total : 135.00
100 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 2,368,692.28
100 Vouchers in this report . Total vouchers : 2,368,692.28
T, the undexsigned, do certi.fy u.ndFr penalty of pexjury,
that the materials have heen furv:ished, the services
r.endered, or the labor-performed ns described herein -
and that the claim i.s just, due and an unpaid
obligstion agsinst the City of Spokane Valley, and that
I am autliorizcd to ~ uthenticate and certify said cWm. .
~
Fina~l~' ctor.= ~ate
r
ayor D
C~unci,l Vr,mhc.r. - Date
Page: 10
- - - . . i.
vchl➢st Voucher List Page: 1
0911112008 3:54:53PM Spokane Valley
Bank code : apbank
Voucher Date Vendor Invoice PO # DescriptionlAccount Amount
15451 9/11/2008 000252 LOWE'S BUSINESS nCCOUNT 1191287 SUI'PUES: PRECINCT 502.83
1220301 SUPPLIES: CP 151.54
1225609 SUPI'LIES: PRECINCT 142_4$
1296548 SUPPLIES: CP 118.99
96576 TOQLSlSUPPLIES: CP 220.39
Total: 1,136.63
1 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 1,136.63
1 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,136.63
I, the Lmdersigned, do certify undex penalty of pcr.jury,
that the materials have been furnished, thc services
rendered, o.r the labar perfor.r.rxed ss descrihed herein
and that the claim is just, due 1nd an unpaid oUligation aga.inet the City o£ Spokane Va]ley, and tihat
I am zutho ~~ed tin authenticate and coxti:.f.y s2id clzam.
. 7T111]C Qx Dflf,f:
.1~
~or ~ Date
uncil Membe.r. D<ytc
. Page: 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: 0 consent ❑ o!d business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending September 15, 2008
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
Gross: $204,037.19
Benefits: $ 32.243.42
TOTAL PAYROLL: $236,280.61
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thornpson
ATTACHMENTS
~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Rrqueat for Councll Acdon
Meeting Bste: Stptcmbcr 23, 2008 City Maaager Segn-oB
Item: C6eck all that Apph : E cansent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. roport ❑ pending legislation
AGEh'DA I7"EM TITLE: Resotatioa 08-018 settV= a date for a Pabtk Hearla; betore tbe
Plannisg Commbaion - Request to vacate approximately 390' in length of 5'h Aventic lacatcd about
250' east of tfie interscction of 5'h Avcnuc and Progress Roed.
BACKGROUND: The applicnnt Brent L. Elliott, on behalf of abuttinb propcrty owners. David and Lisa
Bowers, Lerry Heller, and Emily PofFenbcrger, requasts the vacatian of that portion of Sm Aveaue
describod abovc wbich abuts their pancels. The right of way is unimproved and the abutting garccls are
uccessed via improved str+eets. The ROW is located south of 4°i Avenue, north of 66 Avenue, and east of
Progress Road bctwccn parcels 45231.1510, 45213.1523, 45231.1524 (north) and 45231.1512,
45231.1519 (south),
I ~A~_,+~J~~~
_ ' 4 , f ~ 1i , ~ •
1 ~ • , K.
r x
~ . - - • ! .
G-Y 0,1
~ _ k.. - ; . ~ ~ "-f~
~ ' . I 'Ir~•. . ~ I / • 1 ~ ~ _ Ii _ , ; ,
"..a~ i~ 'j ~ ~ o;'•~.', ~ ~ .
ip-
_ ' ` • ~ ~
'.."11
~ • a^-- ~ ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ A
OPTIONS: Set a daie for a hublic Hearing an the praposed stroet vacation or teke no ection.
AECONIMENDED MOTION: "Appmve ResoluNox 08-018, setl}n$ Octobtr 23, 2008 as tbe dbte jar
a Publlc XearJrrg beJore the Planniirg Comnetrslon an Strr.et Vacatlon Applkatlon STV 01-08"
STAFF CONTACT: Loxi FiAkLOw, Associate Planner
emParca ~m '---pcrmtx-r 12. 2008
nxaFr
CITX OF SPOKANk' VAY„I.EY
~ SYOKAc~TE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~ RESOLUTIQNNO.08-018
A RESOLUTION OF TTHIE C1TY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUI~'TY,
V1'ASHINGT'ON, SET°CIlqG T'HE PUI3LIC HE-ARINC 7)ATE AND TiME FOR TEi-E
PLANNING COVIMISSION TO CONSIDER STREET VACATION YtEQUEST STV-02-
08 POYtSUA\'T TO 1tCVV 35.79.1110.
«HEREAS; the applicant, Brent Elliott, on behalf of the owners David and Lisa Bowers, Larry
1=Ieller, and Emily poffenberger, requests a vacation oF a portion of a S`h Avenue (40 feet wide by 390 feet
deep). The street is located south of 4th Avenue, nort:h of 6'h Avenue and east of Progress Road,
benween Parcels 45231.1510, 45231.1523, 45231.1524 (north) and 45231.1512, 45231.1519 (south),
RHEREFIS; RC1'V 35.79.010 specifies that the legislative authority shall establish by resolution
the time when 3 Street Vacation application shall be considcrcd by the legislative authority or a
committee the.rcof; ancl,
WWEREAS, the Spolcane Valley Municipal Code 22.140 establishes regulations and procedures
for the processing of vacations of public streets (hereafter referred to as "Street Vacation"); and,
WHEREAS, Spokane Valley Municipal Code 22.140.120 specifies that the Planning
Commission shall conduct the public hearing required pursuant to RCW 35.79.010; and shall develop
and fonxard a recommendation for a requested Street Vacation to the City Council.
; -
NOW TFTERrFORE, be it resolved by the Ciry Council of the Cit}° of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington; as follows:
Section l. Establishment of nublic Hearinp- Date and Time for STV-02-08. The required
public hearing for Streei VacaCion Request STV-02-08 shall be conducted before the Spokane Valley
Planning Commission, October 23, 200$ be;inning at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at the
City Hnll of tlie City of Spokane VAlley, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite lOL Spokane Valley,
Washingtvn 99206.
Seetion 2. Effective Aate. This Resolution shall be in full force ancf effect upon adoption.
Adoptetl this 23rd day of SeptemUer, 2008.
CITY OF SPOKANE VA.LLEY
ATTEST:
Ttichard Munson, May'or
Christi.ne Bainbridge; City Clerk
Approved as to fonn:
Office of the City Attorney
Ftesolution IN°o. 0$-018 Fstablishmcnt of Public Hearing Date aud Time for STV-02-08 Pagr 1 of l
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin, report ~ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 08-019: Classiflcation of Database Administrator Position
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 2.50.070 and 2.50.080
. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 2008 Budget Approval through Ordinance 07-018
which included the pending establishment of this position. Staff gave an administrative report on
this proposal at the September 16, 2008 council meeting.
BACKGROUND: The Database Administrator would be a member of the Finance Department
reporting to the Finance Director and may provide direction to contract employees.
It is proposed to establish the Database Administrator at a grade 15. This grade would place
this position at the same grade as the City's current IT Specialists. The proposed position
~description focuses on designing, implementing and maintaining database systems to track City
information in the areas included but not limited to; public works projects and contracts,
community development to include on-line permitting, GIS, finance, administration and human
resources.
This position's initial priority would be to create systems to track expenditures and progress of
capital improvement projects within the public works department. It would also focus on
organizing data from vanous departments for reporting purposes. Further, this position would
assist the current IT specialists in the general support of the City's electronic systems.
Staff recommends establishment of the position of Database Administrator at Grade 15.
OPTIONS: Provide additional direction to staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to approve Resolution 08-019, establishing a
Database Manager Position at Pay Grade 15.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Ongoing annualized costs for the Database Administrator are
estimated at $82,000, which includes benefits costs. There are additional costs such office set-
up and equipment.
STAFF CONTACT: John Whitehead, HR Manager
ATTACHMENTS Draft Resolution, Draft Position Description
DRAF1`
CITY OF SPOICANF, VALr,EY
SPOKAiVE CnUNI Y, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTiON \TO. 08-019
A RESOLUTrON AUTAOKIZING THC ESTAR.LISFLN-iENT OF THE NEW POSiTiON OF
DATAI3ASE AllMIIVISTRATOf2 FOR THE C1TY OF SPOKANE VAI,.L.EY.
WHEREAS, the City Council from time to time must create new employee classifications and
adopt conditions of employmenl for those ncwly-created classifications to adjust its workforce in
re,sponse Co wrorkload demands; ancl ,
WHEKEAS, the City Council through Ordinancc #07-018 adopted thc 2008 City budget which
ineludecl the City's Classification Matrix, including the Database Administrator; and
WI-IC'RE-AS, since adoption of Spokane Valley iMunicipal Code provision 2.50.70, the City
Council has created various new employee classifications jnb descriptions; and
WHTREAS, the City Council adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Cnde provision 2.50.070
which, in part, nrovides that pdsition classifications and job descriptions sliall be developed f4r new
positinns.
NOW 'ff-[LREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokanc VaIley, Spokane
CoLmty, 1Va.shington, as follows:
Section 1. Authori72tion for New Employe.e Cla,.~sifieation and Position Description for
"Daliibase Administrator" Adopted. The City of $pokane Valley creates the new employee classification
of "Database Administrator," a full-time equivaleiit position, a.nd adopts dhe position description for the
position of Database Administrator, attached heeeto as Altaehment 1, as if fully sct forth herein. This job
deseription includes apay grade cla.ssiGeatinn of 15 in the City's elassifiaation matrix.
Section 2. Effective .Date. This Resolution shall be effecCive upon adoption.
Adopted this day of September, 2008.
City of Spokane Valley
Mayor kichard Munson
ATTEST:
Cily Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved xs to 1~'orm:
Offce of the City Attorncy
Rcsolution 08-019 Database Administrator Page 1 of 1
DRAF'C
CITY OF SPOK.ANE VA-LLEY
AOSITION 'QESCRIPTION
Class Titlc: ]llatabase Administrator Job Code NUmber: 418
L7epartment: Finance Grade Number: 15
Division: NA FLSA Status: Lxempt
Date: September 8, 2008 Location: City Hall
GLNFRAL PiJRI'OSE
Perforrns avaricty of database related serviccs that primarily include designing, maintauvng and
implementing database systems to mect the Ciry's needs. Responsible for data analysis,
aclmiivstration, database tuning, uscr suPport, perfonnance measurcment, scripting, report
xvriling, troublcshooting, and analysis of City database soflware systems; software identification,
procurement, and installation; and reviewina business lecluiology needs aPthc City operAtions
for database administration. May bc assigned otlier Information Technology dutics.
SUPFRVISION 1ZECEIVEIa:
Works under the general supervision af the Finance Dii-ector.
SUYFRVISION EXT-RCISLD
None. LSSENT1AL TaU`l IES AND RESPO'N'SIBILITIES
Design, implement and maintain database systems to track City information in the areas included
but not limited to; public works projects anci contrar.ts, community development to include on-
line perniitting, GIS, firiance, administration and human resaurces.
Conducts need analysis with Citv departments to determine software requirements; communicate
with ciepartment personnel to Facilitate the study, use, application and enhancement of database
application systems. Provides technical eYpertise and input.
Analyze aald resolve problems associatcd with sofrivare applications. ]aetect, diagnase and report
relateci problems to applicable sc?ftvare vcndors; secure, install, anci test vendor supplied
software fixes.
Perform a variety of technical duties related to the design, development, acquisition,
implementation, production support, system administration, database administration, and
maintenance nf complex computer and information related systems; providc vendors with design
specifications as neecied.
Iaevelop and maintain appropriate documentation, including necessary Lipdates on City systems.
laatabase 1ldministrator 1
llxA rrr
Respond to departmental requests for database reportuig support. Coordinate and/or provide
training to users, I.T. staff, and other deparCment personnel in the use af business application
systems and equipmcnt.
Conununicate with officials, business community represencatives, City ciepartment personnel,
etc. on automation-rclateci activities or projects.
lnstall comjnercial application software, and City produeed softwarc; clevelop associated
application menus and proccdttres for users.
Attend departniental and public meetings to discuss andlor address issucs and policies. May
advise and recommend policies on the use of inforrnaiion tecfmology.
Participate in atid support leam activities in a constructive, open and positive maiulcr.
Cross-train and backup other Tcchnology Services staff.
Yreparc accurate and timely reports and other -vNritten documents as directcd.
l3ecome familiar witli, follow, and accively support the mission, vision; values and behaviors
stateinents of the City and department.
Perform other ciuties as assigtied.
. .
PERll'HERAi., IaUTIC-S
Provide bdckup support for rclated positions as ncccled.
17epresent khe City at various corrferences and meetings. Serves as a member of various
employcc commiltees as assibned.
1'erform related duties as assigned.
171:SLRED MINIMi.JM QUALIFICATTONS
Educatiou and L:cpcricnce:
A. Graduation from a four-year college or university with a degree in Information
Technology; Coinputer Science, or a closely relateci field; and
B. Three years of incrcasingly responsible eaperience iu the analysis, desigti;
implementation and support of complcx computer systcros, at least one year of
which is in database admuustration; or
C. An equivalcnt combination of education and experience.
i
17atabase Administrator 2
I)RAFT
Necessary Knowledge, Skills anci Abilities: '
i
A. Considerable knowledgc of database systems includiug ielational database
administration and data extraction.
B. Ability ta support staff in the following applications: Eclcn Systems Financial
Software; PLUS permit tracking system, ARISM GIS system, Microsoft SQL
or ACCESS databases, Crystal Reports and I-ITML.
C. Ability tp maintain assignecl progrAms and systcros; ability to troublcshoot
a.ssigned prograrris; ability to meet project deadlines; ability to communicate
effectively orally and in writing; ability to establish and niaintain cffcctive
worl:uig relationstups with, peers, vendors and supervisors; ability tp exercise
sound judgment in cvaluAting situations and in making decisions; ability ta
follow or ;ive verbal and written instructions, as applicable.
D. A key value of the City is customer service. This position requires
eonsider.able knowledge, ability anci skill in the principles and practices of
eaceUent customer service as practiced in both the private and public seetors.
It rcquires the ability to effectively meet and deal with the Public; the ability
to handle stressful situations; the abiliq= to greet and respond to customers in a
friencily; pleasant anci profcssional manner usinb appropriate in-(lection, -
grauunar and syntax; the ability to establish and maintain effective working relationslups wich employees, supervisors, aiid the general public; the ability
to maintain a professional, courtcotis, and pleasant demcanor in diff cult and
stressfiil situations; and the ability to diplomatically deal with diFficult people.
f1 willingness to expend e;clra effort to help the publie find answers or
information relative lo lheir inquiry or complaint is cxpected.
SPFCIAL REQUI_TtEMENTS
Microsoft or relatecl certif cations clesired but not requircd, including but not limited to Microsoft
Certified Yrofessional (MCP) or Niicrosoft Certified Systcros Engineer (MCSE).
`1 OOT_S AND EQUIPMFNT USLU
Personal computer, printer, server, copy machine, f'ax machine, telephone, hand tools and various
diagnostic tools suc;h as LTIIERNE7', iNCP, and TSM, data scopes and breakout boxes.
PH:YSICAL REQUI_Rk,V1ENTS
'Y he physical requiremenls listcd iii dus section include, but are not licnited, to the motor/physical
abilities and skills requircd of tlus position in order tn successfiilly undertake the essential duties
anci responsibilities of the position. In accordance with the Ainericans wiCh Disabilities Act •
Database Administrator 3
i
DRAFT
(ADA), rea.snnablc aecommodations may be made to hclp individuals witli disabilities to
~underlake the cssential dutics and responsibilities of the position.
~ i
While undertalcing the essential duCies arid responsiliilitics of the position, the employee tliust
repeatedly sit, spea.k, hear, listen and detect sounds, and use arms and haiids to grip, hold, reach,
or manipulate the listed tools and equipment. The employee is periodically requircci to walk.
The emplUyee must perioclically lift ancUor move up to 25 pounds. The employee must be able to
diFf'erentiate colort and see small 4bjects at close range.
Employees in this pnsition are expected to bc generally available aFter normal business hours on
evenings and wcckends to providc support for the various key business systems supported by the
IT division.
ADVERSF WOIZKiNG COiNDTTIONS
Advcrse work.ing conditions include, but are not limited to, extremc or intense environmental
circumstancES (such as wetness, heat, cold, dark.ness, light; conf ned spaces, heighl, hazat•dous
materials, vibration, shock, explosiqn, etc.) to which lhe employee may be exposed while
undertaking the essential duties and responsibilities of this position. Tteasonable accoiiunodations
may be made in accordance wwth tlie Americans witli Disabilities Act (ADA) so thal employees
with clisabilities may more successfully manage in said worl:ing conciilions.
' This position works in a general office environment. "1"hcre are currently no adverse worl:ing
conditions associated with this position.
SELFCTIGN GUIDFT NES
Formal application; rating of education and ex.periencc; oral interview and reCerence chcck; job
rclated tests tnay be requireci.
The duties listed abnve are intended only as illustrations o:f the various tyPes of work that may be
perFormed. +Che omissian of specific statements of duties daes noe exclude them from the
position if thc work is similar, related, or a ingical assignment to the position.
"["he job description does not consticute an einployment agreemetit between the employer and
employee and is subjcct to change by the cmployer as the necds of the employcr and
requirements of the job cliange.
Approval: Approval :
Htunan Reseurces Managcr City Manager
Effective Date: Revision History: Ncw Yosilion
!
~
Database Adminiserator 4
DR,AFT
1VI[s\`U'TIES
CITY OF SPOKAiNT VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SE-SSION
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
NJayor Nltnson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed everyone to the meEting
Present:
Councilmembers: Staff:
R.ich Munson, Vlayor 17flve Mercier, City Manager
Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Jackson,l7eputy City Manager
R.ose Dempsey, Councilmember Ivlike Connelly, City Aftomey
Bill Gothmann, Councilmemher Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Lori Barlow, Assoeiate Planner
Steve Taylor; Councilmember Tavis Schmidt, AssistFUit Planner
lliana Wilhite, Councilmember Ken Thompson, Finance DirecCOr
Mike Slone, Parks & Rec Director
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Cary Driskell, Deputy Ciry Attorney
Steve Worley, Seiiior Engineer
K.athy MeClung, Community Develapment Air.
Carolbelle Branch, Public Information Officer
Bill Miller, IT Specialist
~ Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
1
Others Present: Stan A1cNutt; Triangle "'F" Municipal Consulting Services
1 ACTIO\` ITEM• Mation Consideration: Approvul of Barker Road Fisn & Wildlife Atreement -
Steve Wc►rlev
It ►vtas movEd by Councilinember Wilhite and seconded to uuthorize the City Mcrnager or desigrlee to
frnalize arrd e,recute the 13arker Road Bridge Mitigation flgreement. Engineer VVorley cxplainecl the
background and reasons to bring this forth; as mentioned in his September 2, 2008 Request for Cauncil
Actian fornl; he added that the assessment of the contractor's work was just sent to risb &Wilcllife for
tlieir review; and that by eniering into this agreement, we would pay a fee to Spokane Count),
Conservation District to do a project somevvhere else on the River, that it Nvill be for a project thac wiU
benefit the fish life within the River; that we are follo-wing the same proeedure Spokane County used
when they re-built the Argon.ne J3ridge over the Spokane River; that Fish &Wildlife real'ues there is no
way to avoicl impacis to the River and realize the need to build bridges; Fish & Wildlife cannot do a
project but they have someone like us to give a mitigation fce to the Conservation District, and we have
agReed to give the impact fee to the District to be used to benefit the river. v1r. Worley furthcr e,Yplained
that we had to wait tmtil we had a contractor on board and said the fee is not settled yet but Fish R
Wildlife today suggested a fee qf $20,000; thai Fish & 1Vildlife admit there is difiFculty in determining a
fee but they want to make sure the fee is significant enouglt to allow the Conservation laistrict to do a
projECt, like a ban}: stabilir_ation project; that staff examined what Spokane Cotuity paid for the Argonne
River project, and our proposed fcc is in line «rith [hat amount; adding that this fce has been considered in
the entire project budget fee. Mr. Worley said ttiat the accompanying table shows all the extra work the
contractor included in his bid to protect the River from impacts due to the w•ork the contractor will be
doin2. Ma}ror Munson invited public comment; no comments were offered. Council did comment on
now understanding about the high aost to build a bridge. Vote by Accla»iation: In Favor: Urrarrinrous.
Opposed.• Alone. Abstentions: A'one. lYlotion carried.
Study Session Meeting Minutes: 09-a2-08 Paec 1 of 17
Appraved by Cauncil:
DRAFT
2. Watershe:d i'lanninQ Memorandvm of Authoritv - Tavis Schmidt/Grciz MeCormick
Mr. Schmidt gave some background on thc 1'Vater Resource Inventory Area (WRT.A), and accompanying
Viemorandum of Agreement for implementing the detailed plan for WR.iAS 55 and 57, the Little and
Middle Spokane V1'atersheds. Mr. Schmidt esplaincd that we have been participatin€ in the watershed
group since last fall; that they have a detailed implementation plan that accounts for resources in the
aquifer, and streams and mid-Spokane River; that this Agreemcnt, which many other entities have already •
signed; is a non-binding agreement that passes along the recnmmended actinn; hc stressed that since we
are not awater purveyor, we havc no control over rates and usage, but by participating in this group, stafF
can keep informed in plans for water conservation; that we may be asked to mal:e a space available in our
permitt:ing area for xerioscape brochures for commercial and residential projects; and he mentioned that in
our UDC landscape plan, that also recoinmends commercial projecfs to implement the xerioscape, which
when implcmented results in reduction in points; and he requested Council consideracion to placing this
Agreement on the next Couneil's consent 3genda.
There was discussion concerning some oF the recommendations and whether the mitigation ef.-forts eould
becorne politieally uncomforiable, re-affirmation that since we are not a water purveyor that will likely
not be an issue; and mention of awater strategy for our parks, which could entail simply changing the
irrigation system's timer. In Response to Counail questions, VIr. Stone mentioned that Spokane will be
incurring some costs as tbey upgrade iheir manual irrigation system. Vir. Schmidt also stressed that since
this is a non-binding agreement, we can withdraw at any time. Ivlr. Schmidt said he is not aNvare of any
oversight com. rnittee. Councilrnember Gothmann asked if the Spokane Home Builders Association and
our watcr purveyors are aware of this agreement and tu-e participants, and Mr. Schmidt responcfed that the
water purveyors are, but he cannot answer conceming the Home Builders Association. 1'here was
Council consensus to place this agreement on the next Council's eonsent agenda. .
3. Appeal Dcliberation, APP 02-08 and 03-08 - Mike Connellv Ciry Attorney Connelly explained that we have now entered 'uito the deliberation stage of the quasi-
judicial clased record hearino; that the reeord consists of the notebooks previously distributed as well as
the testimony hearcl last week and any written iirgumcnts submirtecl at the time of the hearing through last
Friday, all of which is before council. Councilrnember Dempsey announced that alttiough she was not
present at the hearing, she listened to the tape reeording of that meeting, and has reviewed the documents
and will therefore parlicipate in the appcal deliberation. Attorney Coiinelly staced that CounciPs options
are to aftum or reverse the :Hearing Examiner decision, or send the inatter back for further proceedings;
that the IIelring Examiner's decision is presumecl ta be correct, bul Council can reverse that if diey fmcl
that the Hearing Esanainer engaged i.n unlawful proceclure, the decision is an erroneous interpretation of
the law or not supported by evidence, the decision is elearly an erroneous application of the law to the
facts, or the clecision is outside the Hearing Examiner's authority. In reference to pertinent case law, Mr.
Connelly summarized findings and conclusions as noted on his September 2, 2008 Memorandum.
Attorney Connelly said that the first thresholcl qucstitin is did Couneil intend that the conditions set
forth in section (g) were intendecl to be additional and separate, or Nvas it simply a re-statement of the
general chaiiged conditions requircment imposed by state law. Mr. Connelly says that staff reports that
t}ais is simply a reiteration of what state lavv requires as pa.rt of the changecl condition for a recone. Mr.
Coimelly said he found no court cases where this was found separate tind distinct; and also found no court
cases discussing code provisions idcntical to ours; so there is no cleax direction from the caurt and
Council has discrction to rule either way. Attorney Connelly cxplained that if Council concludes that it
intended subsection (g) to be in acldition to and separate fmm the state requirement, then Council must
next decide the period of time over which they can identify "changed circumstances," or is there evidence
in the recard of substantial chanee in circumstances to justify the rezone; the }-Iearing Examiner's .
decision states that we cannot go back before October 2007 in looking for ahajiges in circumstances; staff /
Scudy Session Meetiiig Minutcs: 09-42-0$ Page 2 of 17
Approved by CounciL-
DRAFT
` feels the changes are in the record and can go back as long as thc area vvas zoned in a similar fashion,
wluch is a designation of 3.5.
Mayor Munson F►sked about his request to receive an objective rcview of the supreme eourt cases
mentioned during the hearing; and Attorney Connelly explai.ned ihat he reviewcd the cases which had a
beari.ng on this issue, but did not summarize every case cited by the parties; that he can continue that
eff'ort if Cowicil desire.s, but he tried to cite those cases directly in point and not inconsistent. It was
determincd that iMr. Connelly will give a summary of all cases cited.
Discussion then centered on legislative intent concerning change of conditions, and Attomey Connelly
cautioned that such must be consistent with the words actually used, and not an inferred intcnt; and
mentioned that when Council passed the UDC, it listed eight conditions, all of which had to be complied
with, the last of those conditions being changed circumstances in t}le zoning district; so the remaining
question is; was t}iis simply reitergting state law or intendi.ng Co have this as aii additional condition.
Council asked the City Clerk to research past Council and Planning Commissian minutes to see if this
topic «<as mentioned; and to bring that information to the next meeting. Mayor Munson i.ndicated due to
tbe reyuest for additional research; he suogested moving the Ftesolution to adopt findings to the
September 16 meeting, which will still be within the time requirements.
Mayor Munson called for a recess af 6:50 p.m.; and reconvened the mecting at 7:00 p.m.
4. Lxw Enforcement Assessment - Stan McNutt
Mayor Munson explained that this agenda itcm will be led by Mr. IvIc-NTutt, who «<ill bc explaining as part
- of liis presentation, a"laundry listi" of possible areas of inquiry or intcrest to include in a law enforcement
assessment; and that questions can be asked of lv1r. Mc\'utt and Chief VanLcuven as needed. After Mr.
~J MeNutt b'*ave a summary of his background, including mention i.hat he was a co-team leader for this city's
incorporation; and he helped coordinate ancl negotiate all the law and justice contracts, including the
police and law enforcement contract; and tliat he was present in all negoYiation sessions with the County;
and mentioned that it takes a great deal of informaUon, time and experience beforc the legislative branch
can rnake different polieies based on that experience, information and data; but that would be undertaken
later, and said that he personally mentioned that several times during the negotiated sessions. Mr. Mc'utt
also mentioned and gave some backeround information on Initiative 900 and performance audits,
including that Yakima is in tlie process of their firsl, "fiill-blown" perfonnance audit. In speaking with the
Xaki.ma City Manager, Mr. MCNutt stated he «<as advised to do studies thoroughly a.s ttie auditor bas fiill
authority to do it again and charge aceordingly. Mr. McNutt also referenced che State Auditor's website
for those seeking furthcr information on Initiative 900, aud said that initiative leacls hun to conclude a
thorough law enforcement assessment is due. v]Ayor Munson said he had not considered this process in
connection with Initiative 900, and he asked who would set the achievement standarcls for law
cn.forcement. IvTr.1VIc~Tutt replied that the auditors are just now undertaking their first performance audit
of this type, and mentioned the more the entities do, the less the auditor will have lo dn or re-do; and said
there is an Municipal Research and Services Center (IvLRSC) overview which states that "Performance
audits are to be conducted by the state auditor in accordance with the United States General AccAUntinj
Office Auditing St3ndards; and the Initiative inaludes nine speaific elements to be included in each
performanc_e audit; e.g. (1) identification of cost savings, (2) identification of sentices that can be reduced
or eliminated, (3) identification of programs or services that can be transferred to the private scctor, (4)
analysis of gaps or overlaps in programs or services and reconunendations to correct them, (5) feasibility
of pooling the entity's information technology systems; (6)analysis of the roles and functions of the entity
and recommendations to change or eliminate roles or functions, (7) recommendations for statutory or
regulatory changes that may be necessary for the cntity to properly carry out its functions, (8) analysis of
the entiry's performanoc data, performance measures tuid self-assessmcnt systems, and (9) identification
of best practices.
Siudy Session Meeting r4inutcs: 04-02-08 Page 3 of 17
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Mr. McNutt said his role tonight is discussion facilitator; he mentioned that he spoke with the Sheriff who `
has a Powerl'oint present3tion, and apologizcd for not havi.ng time tonight to review that, and suggested
Council make time to review that later. So that everyone would be nble to vicw his notes, by using a
laptop "tablet" computer, M.r. McNuYt made notes on the tablet whieh wcre projectecl onto the two serecns
in the room.
lvLr. vlcAtutt said that the ultimate desired outcorne is still an unkno-vvn as it depends on the council's
desires, but stated that a suggested desired outcome is to gather and review operating data as a precursor
to further decision making; and that the goals for a study f see Addendum A"Law Enforcement
Assessment" handout, and attached handNtiTitten notesl are based on Nvhether a study is under[aken and are
to be dctermined by Council so that a scope of services might be identiFied. Mr. Mc°utt said in order to
facilitflte that discussion, he offcred the four suggcsted tasks to undertake as shovim on the attached, and
said that tonight's goal is to work toward consensus of acceptance of some items of areas of inquiry or
interest. Maynr Munson asked if Council would also havc, or be able to get, inforination conceming cost
efficiencies for each of thesc areas of inquiry; and Mr. Ivlc\TUtt said he Nvould refer Council to Initiative
900 which anstivers the question, that we either identify costs or diey [tlie auditors] will identify those for
us.
NIr. Mc\~utt began discussion on whether to retain those "Tasks to Undertake" if such a study or analysis
were conducted, as follows:
i. Perform rnt rnralysis oJcrirne trends, iclentify strengtlis nnd weuknesses, opportaniilies or lhreats
Vlr. Mercier said that the object is to idcntify activities that could be undertaken as part of the study to
generate as broAd a category Qf information a.S possible for council's later consideration; so there would
bE a SWOT (strenaths, weaknesses, opportunities, threais) analysis performed as part of the assessmcnt,
which would not preclude Council from cloing an additional SWOT analysis once all thc data is gathered. "
There was no nbjection from Gouncil to have this task as part of the study.
ii. Identify strategic abjectives for Spokune Yulley lcnv er:forcenrent
Mr. McNutt said this is addressed in the contracted section 14 where the City is to develop policies from
which the County Shcriff «<ould acldress concerning how to meet those, and said this is the one he
mrntioned that they clict not presume to clo when tlie City frst iricorporatecl, but was defcned to a later
time. Mayor Munson asked if these objectives would be open for discussion once tliey are suggested, Fuid
Mr. McNutt eoncuned. There was no objection frpm Council to have this iask as part of the sCudy.
1ii. Ferforni a ttrctical anal}uis ojcrinte statistics, trendr and recar2mencled hest deploymer2t uf
resottrces in resporise.
,vlr. Mercier said this begins tq address workload-based deploymcnt, which i.nclucies what is occurring in
the community, when, anci where, Fuid are resources oriented to take best advantage of those resotuces
when the workload is the most signifcant in the areas in vvhich they occur. Tbcre was no objection from
Council to havre this task as part of the study.
iv. Identify ccirrent baseline performance (henchmarking) so service levels can be determined wzd
perfarrnunce measures cun be establishetl.
Ivir. McNutt said the basis for this task is alsn section 14 of the exisiinL contract; and said that one of the
re,asons the policies were not adopted initially, was that they hacl no reason upnn the City's incc>rporation
to adopt any policies that might be different from the existing sheriff's palicies, but that there was never
an assumption that woulcl bc the case in perpetuity; as Cities also have some direetion to their law
enforcemcnt department, and it is not always the same as a Sheri.'s 17epartment; and that it is normal to
adopt policies wich.in city law enforcement. Iviayor Munson asked Chief VanLeuven how much
informAtion he colleats now in order to achieve this goal; and Chief VanLeuven said they collect quite a
Study Session Meexing Minutes: 04-02-08 Page 4 of 11
Approved by Council:
nRAFr
bit of infortnation, and are primarily examining call notes for service, that he has not scen the data yet but
` thcy are bei.ng developed, with the data aimed at the City spcciFical.ly, and there should not be a problem
in wrorking closely with the gathered data. There was no objection from Council to have diis task as part
of the study.
v. OChers? Councilmember Taylor said the other ta.sk discussecl in the prior study is to look at the altemative
assessment to see what the differetices would be if Lve fqrmed our own police department or continued
with the status quo; aiid that much of the information sought in the tasks just discussed would help
establish what that alternative might look like and give a bettcr handle on contract negotiations and how
to maintain a contraat over the long term; and }aaving the altematives is in the best interest of the City. In
other words, Councilmember Taylor sugeested conductinQ an_ analYSis of policing alternatives for the
City. including forming our o~Nqi police department. Cauncilmember Gothmann mentioned there is a
difference behveen analyzing our own contract police department and gathering information to develop
our o,,vm pol.ice dcpartmenY; and that the latter would require analysis of a civil servicc commission and of
grade steps, and a detailed analysis bcyond our present contract; that we have a right to perform any
ftnalysis of our own police department, but that we do not have a right to go into somethi.ng that is
noncontractual, and to quote Mr. Mercier's contracts as e.camples, "records with respecl to all mltters
covered in this tigreemenC' and said it mentions several f►greements wh-cre we havre the right to those
records, but not an}°thing beyond that. iMr. Mercier said that memorFUidum was included in the Council
packet because during the last discussion of this subject, there was considerable question raiscd as to
whether the Ciry was taking liberties at looking intra-contract, and this information is to provide a survey
of the l:ind of reservations of rights the city maintains when it is contracting for any service; and that it
- would be a mis-read of that clocument to suggest that in any way the Administration wa,s hinring tllat the
City Council is not able to authorize looking at any other dimension of ajiy other department.
Mayror Munson said in loo}:ing at the question of what it wauld entail to start our own police force, would
it be advantageous to determine what items we tivould need to investigate and at what cost, rather than do
the invcstigation and determine cost later, as wages and labor negotiations change; as there are many
unknowns, such as whethcr we form our o-vNm civil service commission or could use the County's; or
would that need to be negntiated, and «fiat are the costs associated. Councilmember Taylor ageed that
we cannot Fu1s-%ver those questions wikhout doing an analysis; and such analysis would not just look at
Spokane County bui at a host of various law enforcement aLencies to gather a good survey of hest
practices; and added that most every clocument in every public agency is open to public scrutiny; and he
sees the xssessment of the Spokane County Sheriff's Office as an area to analyze and provide an analysis
and an alternative to assist in fiture negotiations. Councilmember Dempsey said that an assessment of
our police department would be separate From an assessment to see if contracting with the Sheriffls
Department would compare with our ocvn palice dep3rtrnent As those are two separate questions. iViayor
Munson agreed that thcy are hvo questions, and tonight's question is do w'e want to know that now as part
of the overall piclure services, and do we want to know what il would cost to start our own force.
Councilmember Taylor said he feels our citizens have a right to know, that Councilmerr►bers have an
obligatinn to find out and make sure that half of our general fund budget is being used prop£rly and based
upon performancc indicators and benehmarks. Councilmember Dempsey asked how much money we arE
planning to spend on such an endeavor, as if we checked with various police departments across the
country, the cost would mouut quicldy.
Councilmember Taylor cnLmtered that we have already spent approYimately $75 million on law
eriforcemcnt services with no assessment over those five and a half years; and that $125,000 is very small
; ~comparcd with the funds going out; that the reasons to do this are accountability, and if we havc
altematives, we move into contract neootiations from a stronger position, and that we are currently
operating under a contract that was hastily yet aptly nut tooetber by a great team that came in on the
Study Session Meeting IN4inutes: 09-02-08 Page S of 17
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
interim so we could have law enforcement scrvices prior to incorporation; but the contract has not been ;
updated, and it is important to do that that we know there au-e some issues over the adm.inistratinn of the contact such as command and control, and that some of those issues came up when we were going
through the last election cycle; and he said to mitigate from having those problems again, Council must
take a close look at the contract and to do so from a position of strength, we need propcr analysis
ineluding an alternative.
Mayor Munson said he wnulcl be surprised if we took that option; but the point of havi.ng the information
may make that option even less attractive; and tUat we can't assess an unknown cost; but this would be an
opportunity to confirm our belief that we are getting great service; and that it is important to havc a
negotiated position as this contract will be re-negotiated within the next hvelve months; and both sides
have asked for re-ncgotiatian; so in order to gagc the County's request as to some changes in services,
including a change in cost to what it would cost to bave our oNvn foree, it would be beiieficial to
understand what we can ancl can't do to provide the community with law enForcement; that it is not
neccssarily leverage but is knowledge; and without researching the alternatives, we would he left wilh a
`take it or leave it" scenario; and it is best to enter negotiations with all alternatives.
Mr. Mercier said in response to Deputy Mayor Denenny's question of a tactical analysis, that sueh tactiaal
analysis Would also try to capture the costs associated; but that it appeFU-s Council.member Taylor is
looking for an additional task to identify the alternative costs of what it would be if there cvere an
indepcndent poliee department. Deputy Ma}jor Denen.ny said then if wc have a tacrical analysis we would
use that as a baseline for doing the financial analysis; to which Mr. Mercier replied that is correct in part,
but thai a tactical walysis does not apply to a variety of other items thal Council might choose to include
on the list.
Mr. VIcNutt said earlier discussion had some goals suogcsted for a study, one of which was to deterniine ~
the scope of services for assislino the city in renegotiating a law cnforcement contract with the Spokane
Cotmry Sheriff, and said that there was never an interest in prioriti.zing an altenlative sludy over the
contracting and carrying, nut of t}le law enforceinent services; he added that he is not sure what the auditor
will eventually do with tbis; but the idcntification of cost savings is the nurnber one item on Initiative 900,
and added that we do not kno,%Ar wliat studies or performance measures in c;ost tnight affect us or the
County; ftnd that the first ttivo items in citizen Initiative 900 are the nrinciple identification af cost sflvin-s
is comparison Fuid identifeation of services that can be reduced or eliminated. Mayor Munson said that
the auditor's office has identified that the ten largest cities will be those entilies who tivill first fall under
this perfonnance evaluation; and that Yakima is receiving the all-ericompassing perFormance audit, and
sucb will happen here as well. Ivlr. VlcNutt said the second item in early consideration as a possible goal
for a study, was the draft scope of services for perfarming an altemative analysis whereby the City had an
option to establish an independent police department; and would be the sec4nd priority; anci he asked if
there are other tasks Council would want if such stuciy were conducted.
Depaity iVfayor Detrenny said in reviewing the ICMA study, one of the tnsks thut needs to be clone is
r•eview of the positive and negutive ran:ificutions af rerietiving our contract, antl by doing this analysis, we
are alsa looking at alternutives. Mayor Munson added tUat the inteot of having an altematives analysis is
not the intent to start our own police departmenY; and Councilmember Taylor stated that while there is not
thc intent, we need to be clear in terms of benchmarking ancl performing a tactical analysis and lool:ing at
the data, and in order to establish a contract that will stand over time, he said he feels it is important to
spell out that we have the best available altemaCive; ajid the decision on wliether to form our oNvn pnlice
department is a different topic discussion and different policy choice; and that he feels Council would be
doing a disservice to the citizens by not having that inforniation available.
Study Session Meeting Minutes: 09-02-08 Pa,ge 6 of 17
Approved by Cauncil:
DRAFT
Councilmember Taylor said t}le goal of the study is not to perfonn a study, and he suggested council
come up with the right justi.6cation to continue the status quo, but alsn to have that i.n.formation available
to see what changes might be warranted.
Mr. McNutt said that the number one task or goal could be to determine a scope of services for assisting
the Ciry in renegotiating a law enforcement contract with Spokane County Sheriff; and that goal two
could be drafting a scopc of services for performing an alternatives; and that these two options could be
addresscd later; but said the items thal would be discusscd would be down in the list of inquiry; F►nd he
asked if Council should proceed with the "areas of inquiry or interest" on the basis of the understanding
that Council will have a scope of services study; or for re-negotiating a contract, or for all options; and
said that decision could also be made at a latcr date.
For added tasks to tmderta}:e, Deputy 1ltlcryor Dertenrry reiterated his desrre lo include a"revietiv of the
pasitive arrd negative ramfficutions af rer2ewing a:a contract wilh the Sheriff's Department" which is
gathering data including pros and cons upon which to make a decision. Councilmember 1'aylor said he
wpuld support that, but would also like to include specsc language to include an alternatives analysis.
Councilmember Taylor stated that Council will not obtain the value from the study and asked how it will
help in contract negoliatiions if there is no alternative analysis; and asked if these "pros and cans" «<ould
present altematives upon entering negotiations; and if so, he would like to hear how that would be
expandECl. Councilmernber Taylor added that there -vvas in the past, a significant contract crisis concerning
control of the hiring and firing of our police chief; which issue was never resohred; and that in going
through this assessment, if there is no clarif cation an what alternatives there are, we will not fix that
problem.
.
' Councilmember Gothmann pointed aut the Ki.ng County contrace, which shows five detailed pages of all
parties' responsibilities; and he asked if it is possible for this Council to use King County's thirteen yeai-s
experience as a prototype for Spokane Valley's; and he suagested that would be a better method then
spending $130,000; that the King Caunty contraat addresses cost reduction; and he mentionecl that he sent
copies of King County's contract Co ivir. Mercier; Councilmembers, Sheriff Knezovich; and Police Chief
Va.nL,euven. Councilmember Taylor counterecl that if one is in aweFilc negotiating position; rt.ll great
things in any concraet wrould not bring the pther parfy to agreement. Except for Councilmembcr
Schimmels, there was general Council consensus to include the task of "reviewing nf positive tuid
negative ramitications of renewing our contmct with thc SherifPs Department. Councilmember Taplor
suggested also addino "conduct an unalysis af polrcing alternatives for Spoktrne Vulley"; but there rva.s
no consensus to add that task.
Councilniember Decnpsey said she recalled [here was a vote on this matter several weeks ago; but Mayor
Munson said, and CouneiLnember VVilhitc confirmed, thlt referenced vote resultecl in Councilmember
Wilhite ashing that this issue be rervisited and discussed further, and such suggestion was agreed upon by
faur Council.members. Councilmember Wilhite mentioned thal once those pros and cons are prescnted, if
there is an abuntlance of negative ramifications, that would pose ihe question to Council of how to handle
that, and how to negotiate that, fuid if such did not come to a satisfactor}° conclusion, Couneil woulci have
to look elsewhere, and at that point, if CoLmcil felt they were not getting the services needed for the
citizens, Council could choosc to have our own police department or look for another partner to provide
law enforcement services; she added she realize_s it will be expensive to start our own police department
as it was when the City started, as there are start-up costs associated with such cndeavors; and she said
those positives and negatives would be helpful in negotiations; and that there would be financial
rainifications for both entikies if either the Sheritps Office or the City were to ever look at haviog anotiier
parhler.
~ i
Study Session kN9eeting Mtinutes: 09-02-08 Page 7 of 17
Approvcd by Cauncil:
DRAFT
,
Cauncilmcmber Sch'vnnaels said although we have struggled wit6 this for several months, we are still not
to the basics of what do we have Coday and what dv we want; and if this is not solved, there can be no mnving forwfu'd in a correct manner; and said he feels the•se five tasks address what he wants in order to
keep it simple, solve the nroblems with what we have today, and move from there.
vir. McNutt then moved to the "areas of injury or interest" tuid asked i_f there are additions or deletions;
and brief discussion followed on the elements listed, including explanation of CCLEA (Commission on
Accreditation of Law Enforcement Agencies) and WSPt1, comments &om Police Chief VanLeuven and
Sheriff Knezovich concerning the Sheriff's certiFcation process and the high eost of the accreditation
process with CCLFA, and the Lexipol Accreditation process which flie Sheriff's Office is moving toward.
Mayor Munson read the listed 27 areas of inquiry or interest; stated that those are the items just agreed to,
and he asked if oncc involved with 95, performanca measures, and it becomes apparent to whn ever is
hirecl to do this, that we need to do an alternative study, should that be included in the amount of funds to
he approved in the initial taskirlg, knowing t}iat it might not be spent; and lhai the current budget is
scheduled for amendment consideration in October, -which will authorize this studv. It was also Council's
consensus to chrnrge #12 to oinit the tivortls "startup casts versus. " Sheriff K.nezovich added that
"Community Oriented Policing" i.nvolves SCOPE ancl how law enforcement works with volunteers; and
is an overarching philosophy; and he suggestcd adding "training" to the list. Sheriff Knezovich also
commented that if Chere had been open dialogue on tbis issue, Couneil would learn that the Sheriff's
Office is going through a SWOT anAlysis now; and that Sheriff's 4ffice is currently engaged in many
things on the list; he mentioned that "Spokane Valley" is the customer; and qskcd if this is designecl as an
aid in negotiatians, and asked are those negoliations designed to a point where there is no common
ground during the negotiations, as be mentioiied that it sounds as if this will Ue from a position of
strength, and said ifthe Sheri.f_f's Office doesn't share, wrould [here be a counter-action; or he asked, i.fi'this :
will be working together to find that common ground; as a"do th.is or else" mentality is analogous to dealing with a hostile entity and riot a partner; but rather if Council comes into negotiation in the spirit of
what we want for the carnmuniey, thcri conunon ground will be found; he mentioned tbat there was
cAmmon graund previously given; and said that Council should proceed with a study if that is the avenue
they determine, and said that the Sherifrs Office will cooperate, but said before such shjdy is conducted,
it might be advantageous for the Mayor and some Councilmembers and the City Manager to rneet witU
the Sheriff's Officc to see what they are currently doing and how they are performing; and added that he
feels Spokane Valley would be surprised at the currcnt level of service and professionalism; and he
reminded cveryone thaC in 2004 the citizens vroiced t,heir support of the policc services; ancl he asked if
Councilmember Gothmann's work was examined, as SherifF Knezovich felt such work was an "eye-
opener'' for them, and said that he has included some of Councilmember Golhmann's worlc on a
PowerPoint to show just how efficient the operations are; and he looks fonvard to meeting with Spokane
Valley to cliscuss the need for doing a study, fuid he mcntioned he supports whatever Council decides to
do; and he asked that his office would have time to implement any reeommendations before rnoving to
the ne.ct p}iase after the study.
Councilmember Gothmann stated that Council does not negotiate contracts; that Council sets policy and
the City Manager negotiates; that he exanined King County's aontracts, that they contraet witti tliirteen
different cities, and that they have solved many of the problems we have now with communications
between our City and the Sheriff; ajid he encouraged the Sheriff and the Ciey Manager to examine King
County's contract as a possible star[ing place for negotiations. Sheriff I'sezovich mentioned that they
have been aware of King County's contract since October 2006. Mr. McNutt said the model contract
used in 2003 was Pierce County; and he suogested including that contraeC as they are a little smaller then
Kint County, which is roughly the size of the staie of l.daho organizational-Nvide, and that Pieres County ,
is a closer demographical model. M.r. McNutt asked if there is full consensus to rcfcr this matter to the
City Manager for his suggested follow-up strategy.
Studr Scssiun Meeking Minutes: 09-02-08 Page 8 of 17
Approvcd by Council:
DIZAFT
Mayor Munson mentivned that he has l-nown M.r. Mercier since he was first employed, and said that Mr.
Ivlercier has always demonstrated good faith negotiarion in aU matters; that the necessity to have good
faikh information to form good policies will be the basis of the negotiations and that is essential; that we
need to give management staff the tools they need to do that assessment so Council can discuss next
steps; and to make good decisions, Council must have good information, and said that he will support the
City Nlanager to come forward with a proposal and a cost to be discussed in Qctoher. Councilmember
Taylor statcd that he feels this is unfortunate the way the original scope of services was rejected and the
contrnversy that was started with tihe idea that there was a priority of forming a new department versus
looking at an alternative; and said that Council along wi[h a vocal few, have made a big issue out of
something which is not a.n issue; as ihe issue is and was to gather int'ormation, and the policy decision of
whether to condnue the contract or move into an alternarive arrangernent is something that Council has
not discussed as the information is not available to discuss that, and moving with this scope of scrvices
will only give half of the data nceded; and again stressed how unfortunate it is that the topic has been
politicized and positions tglcen based on issues not discussed or information not gained; Fu►d said while he
supports moving fonvard, he believc•s a piece cvill still be missing by not including an altemat;ive analysis.
Councilmember WilhiCe stated that we are a-vvare of the Sheriff's work toward certification; and said
doing a study fram SPokane Valley's vicwpoint will help the Sheriff in doing his benchmarking as he
determines what be neecls to cfo in contracting with us, and as such, this should be an aid to the Sheriff,
and anything to be fiurther incorporAted into a ccmtract, would not be given to the Sheriff ns an ultimattim,
and Council realizes it takes time to bring about changes, and said that we would want to wrork with the
Sheriff in bringing about any changes, which helps wilh the Certification process; and with the Spokanc
Valley's risk analysis as well.
iMr. Mc\iutt mentioned that the new cities Nv-hich have fortned in King County over the last fifteen to
hwenty years have mostly been incorporated under the Council/ManAger form of government; and said
that King County had to learn how to relate to that different form of gnvernment; nnd that King and
Pierce County had eYperienced dealing with some of the difficult issues we arc going through now, such
a.s command and control; appointments, policies and proccdures, all of which is not unusual; and he
mentioned that SheriffK.nezovich askcd and i~/Ir. VlcNutt agreed to meet last June and Mr. McNut[ shared
the history and intents of ttie original contract from tbc CiCy's perspective; adding that we are a«<are this is
a two-way slreek; and saicl that he is aware of his bias, i.e. that «fien negotiations first began for this
contract, he often told the County's ncgotiatin- team, Nvhen an issue was not moving forward, that while•
an issue might seem to be moving in a cnnect way for the County, it did not quite meet the City's needs
from the change in goverament; and said many times thai a cnntract needs to be negotiated for a
perrnanent relationship; anci said that Spokane County also has the option of not continuing with a
contract; that a County contract is a good move wlien tt City first incorporales, provided there is absolute
openness bet«<een the ageiicies and those agencies exeeutive directors, there is equity, fairness,
compatibility with the eiitities' systems, harmonious relaCipns, and some method to me_asure performacice,
which performance and auditing is now mandated as a result of Initiative 900; and that the City always
maintains the option of an alternative way of dnin€ the seivice, while the first choicc is ahvays to make
the current choice wnrk. Mr. Mercier added that Sue Passmore did some additional rese,arch in that she
contacted every entity with which I{ing and Pierce county contracls, and nnne of those entities have fuiy
current performance mcasures for their law enforcement agencies, and said that this particular study will
likcly give us an opportunity to be statewide leaders in this matter.
Mayor Munson asked for Council consensus to price this out, and eome back in October with new
contract recommendations. Councilmember Gothmann stated his bclicf that there are altematives to doing
this which would cost less; Councilmember Taylor said he would support the language as hc supports
~ moving forward, and voiccd his hope that we will not have to come back for something new;
Councilmember Schimmels said he will support what wE have tonight, and feels this is very much
overdue. Maynr Munson said there appears to be consensus to move for%vard on a contract proposal and
Study Session Meetiag A4inutes: 09-02-08 Page 9 of 17
Approvetl by Council:
DRAFT
cost; with five Councilmembers in agreement. Mayor Munson eactended thanks to Mr. vleNutt and Chief VanLeuven.
Mayor Munson called for a recess at 8:45 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 8:54 p.m. It was then
mpved by Councilmember Wil3iite urtd secondecl, to extend the »teeting to 9:30 p.nt, In F'avor: Muyor
Mimson, Depury Mayor Denenrty, and Councilnzembers Schirrimels, Gothmann, Dernpsey, und f-Yilhite.
Opposed: Councilmeniber. Taylor, flbstentions: None. eblotion carried
5. Sprague/Applewav l2evitalizadon Plan - Book I- Scott Kuhta
After brief discussinn on the Uest proeedure to begin deliberations of Book I, and further mention that the
Planning Commission hatl no recommended changes to this Book, it was determined to review each
section individually.
1.2 Intent
# 1 Transform the visual charac#er of SQrague Avenue
Council acknowledged they realize this is not just the buildings, but the visual chiracter of the streei
itsel£ Coucicil agreed with Intention #1.
421Ze-position disinvested corridor properties to eapture value in the cqnte►nporM marketplace.
Council agreed tivith Intention #2,
#3 lnstiaate die construction of the first City Center for the new C
,i y of Spakanc Valley.
lt was mentioned that this is not the sole intent of tbis plan as some have suggestecl, but is a main piece of
the plan. Council agreed with 1.ntention 0.
i
#4 J.ncrease the vehicular capacity of the SpraQUe-AP13lewa,y transportation corcidor.
`1r. Kuhta explainecl that we have received many comments and questions eoncerning how we are
increasing capacity with the recornmended systems; and he explained the differences between the current
configurations on both strcets and the proposed eonfigurations and mentioiled that the number of travel
lanes is not as important a.s capacity and intersections; which lcd to brief inention of funding s4urces. Mr.
Kuhta stated that the plan for funding these chFUiges is not to come from raising caxes; but that scafF is
looking at federal ancl state fimding sources, and said that extending Appleway would be a big part nf
that; and [hat overall, inereased capacilv and extendin? Appleway wiJl crcate a better network far moving
traffic, and if things are leil as they are, intersections suah as Sullivw and Pines in plrticular will fail. it
was noted that traffic will be discussed in more detail when Book II is discussed. Council agrecd with
1iltention #4.
#5 Substantially enhance the development poten[ial and value of the properties currentlv lininu the
underdevcloped Applewa~~, right-of-wav.
Mr. Kuhta said that the intent is to increase the value of the properties along Appleway. Councilmember
Dempsey voicecl her concern about the intent of the development potential of the Appleway right-of-way
and said she is uncertain the intent is beneficial to the people -who live and own properties along the
corridor, as they will be damaged fi.nruicially by the downznnin- of property; and that the intent should
not be "glossed over" at this point. iv1r. Cocinelly spoke and said that therc is a difference between the
comp plan and the development regulations, and what Council should be looking at here is vvhether you
auree with the words, specifically "enhanee development potential and value of properties;" and once
Council deliberates on the development regulations, Council can determine if the development
regulations actually meet tliis goal and then act accordingly. Councilmember laempsey voiced her ~ continued concern that if she agrees with this now, later when Council gets to the other part, she will be %
reminded she already agreed to it. Mayar Nlunson snid what she wnuld be agreeing to is, clo w•e want to
Study Scssion Meeting Minutes: 09-02-08 Page ] 0 of 17
Approved by Councif:
DRAFT
enhance the developmcnt potential and value of the properties; and the question once we get intn the other
books, is doe,s the plan achieve those goals. Cotmcilmember Taylor added that now we are only looking
at the intent of this. Mayor Munson asked if Councilmember Dempsey has a problem with taking action
that would enhancc the develnpment potential and value of the properties, and Councilmcmber Dempsey
stated she does not. Councilmembcr Taylnr stated, and Mayor Munson agreed, that there will be ample
opportunities to discuss how the development regulations in Book II would work to implement this
statement. Council agreecl with Intention #5.
#6 Support the conxinued growth and success of Auto Raw as the re i~n's premier destination for Aut2
Sales.
Council ag'eed with Intention 46.
07 F3alance mobility and access vehicular and nedestrian fiinctionalitv alonQ the Corricior.
Mr. Ku.hta mentioned that ihis is called nut in the comprehensive plan tn balance the transportation
system and not placing cars as the most important thi.ne, over all else; but places the importance on places
for people to walk, take the bus, bike, multi-modal, and have a completc system of transportation.
Councilmember Taylor mentinned state laNv regarding concurrency, which is extremely dependent upon
the automobile and levels of services at i.ntersections, and said that this bring into mind some significant
chanjcs that m.ight have to occur to levels of concurrency along the Sprague eonidor, in that pedestriFUi
mobility could be placed at an equal or higher levrel then the automobile, and there could be a confliel as
State law states if you don't have the vrehicular capacity, you need to deny development unless you drop
levels of services. i~/1.r. Kuhta continued that discussion by stating if we had shown in our analysis that the
proposed street transportation nehwork were dropping levels of service below our sttindards, we would
need to have a different system, but they are more than meeting the proposed plan for streets and our
adopted levels of service, and in fact, it would be the envy of most west-side communities to have these
levcls of services which are projected in the 1'lan; mid that the Growth Management plan calls for multi-
modal policies in comp plans; and that our levels of service are measured in intersections; and we could
look at measurc of service such as traWel corridor time rather than just ho-,v long it takes to get throug;h
one intersection; Nvhich will be further discussed «fien Book T_II is discussed. Councilmember TayIpr
acl-nowledged that this discussion will be fortihcoming when Book I[I is discussed, but he mentioned that
Council is mal:ing some cliEferent value statements regarding what the priorily along the Conidor will be;
and said that we have to be willing to have a develapment that is more pedestrian frienclly, i1: will conflict
`vith the sCancfard automobile use; F►nd if you don't want to deny the future corridor development, we may
be forced to reduce levels of services, much like what oceurred in Bellevue, Seattle and other cities. lir.
Kuhta said he is iiot aware we arc neccssarily creating better environinents for bikes and pedestrians,
unless taking away travel lanes and capacity at intersections has affecCed levels of service for cars, which
can be exfunined, but the first seiitence undEr the intent is to "coordinate public snd private i_nvestments to
instue tUat sufficient vchicular capacity is provided along with [emphasis addcd] sufficieot accessibility
for corridor-fronting development and that the needs of the automobile are met wiChin a context of
pe.destrian com..Fort."
Mayor Mtmson asked for an explsnation oftlle last sentenee under #7, i.e.: "Define a framework for the
implementation of street improvements geared to the requirements of fronting development for each
segment of the Corridor." Mr. Kuhta said the regulations call for frontagc improvements for development
for properties fronting these sNeets; so this is saying Yhat we will define what the requirements are for
those frontage improvements later on in the development regulations; and each segrlient has its own rules.
Couneilmember Wilhite asked concerning the "fronting development and the corridor fronting
development," wheiher that means in particular that in corridor segments everything has to be front
facing. JJMr. Kuhta said the plan cloes eall for buildings to orient tovvards streets, so it would be fronting
~ the street. Council agreed with Intention V.
Study Session Meeting Minutes: 09-02-0$ Page 11 of 17
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
,
48 Ineorporate transit 12lanning into the vigion for the Corridor.
Councilmcmber Taylor voiced his agreement with this statement, and addcd that ttus is imporiant in
understanding that this is not a"zero-sum" game where as different uses and zones corne into play along
the corridor, and i.n looking at today's market one might assume they are being do-vvnzoned, but in reality,
and in looking at the idea of esYablishing bettcr transit capacity, that then makes uses that might not be as
marketable now, more valuable as residential, multi-use, various neighborhood commercial uses can be
placed in these areas and therefore the land values rise; so this is a value-enhanced tactic that can help
increase thc comdor's value. Council aereed wit}i Intention #8.
99 Create a framework for sustai.nable development.
Mr. Kuhta mentioned there flre many components included in "sustainflble develppment" and can range
from prnviding more of a complete transportation systein to allow for multi-modal such as walking and
bilcing, to indiviclual buildings and "green" buildings, addina that there is nothing eontained herein to
require that a builcling must be "green." Mayor Munson brought up the previous discussion concerning
providing incentives to those who develop along the corridor, F►nd asked where that might be addressed in
Booh U. Nfr. K.uhta said the plaii does not call for specific rcquirements for green buildings, and said
Council can discuss how incentives can be incorporated into tlie plan; that the idea to crcate incentives to
build specific buildings types is not a part of this plan; this encourages green buildings but does not
mandate having green bu'tldings nor state 1iow that might or should be accomplished; and cities across the
nation are e•xfunininD ways to incorpomte sustainable practices and how to incorporate that into the daily
lives of ciry govemment and into regulations; bul this is merel}' a very small firsl stcp to suggest
exunining sustainable framework for future development. Mayor Munson responded therefore, that Nve
don't want to remove the possibility of being able to develop thnse regulations later; and Mr. Kuhta
concurred. Cauncil agreed wit:h Intention #9.
, 410 Establish a planninc., f.ramework that builds on and reflects the unique character of the Citv and
ReEion.
Mr. Ktthta said we received commenis about how we are just trying to inake this inlo a 13ellevue or San
Francisco; Uut that is noi the intEnt of this document and has never been the intcnt of this plan; the type of
dcvelopment cnvisioned is different, but we want it to reflect what Spokane Valley is, and that is
definitely the intent of this plan and this g031. M.ayor Munson remarl:ed that we are a city of almost
89;000 resideots; we have appro.Yimately 44;000 households, over 5,000 registemd businesses; that we are
not a bedroom community and have not been such for a long time; and tliis is one of the reE►sons we
incorporated; and he seid we should start acting lil:c a city and not a bedroom community.
Cauncilmember Wilhite said therc aee several architectural styles wiihin the city, ancl she is not sure there
is any style unique to the Spokane Metropolitan region. vlr. ICuhta said the urban design experts asked
hirn if he eould futiculatc «fiat the aretiitectural style of Spokane Valley is, ancl hc had difticulty in
coming up wikh a definitive answer; althougll he mentioned some of ihe more prevalent materials of the
area; and said tliis will be discussed more under tlie arcbitecturfll guidel.ine.s section. Counci] agreed with
Intention # 10.
Mayor Munson suggested Council continue discussion/clel.iberation of Book [ to next sessian, and
combine that with the beginning of Book l.L It ivas nroved hy Depttty Mayor Denenny, secotrdetl, und
unanimously ugreed to extend the meeting an additionnl frve minutes. M.r. Kuhta asked if Council would
like staff to start looking at some alteniatives for the implementation of this plan; that w•e have received
numerous questions concerning applicability, and whether the plan should be phased. There was Council
consensus to look at alternatives. Councilmember Taylor added that he would not like to put alternatives
before discussions, that initial discussions and staff presentations concerning public comments would be
prudent; and that in discussing tliis plan, if Couneil docs not feel comfortable with the plan's adoption,
and would like to put in or enact a sigilificant alternative or amendment, it should be done then rather than _.%Study Session Meeting Minuic5: 09-02-08 Page 12 of 17
Approved by Cauncil:
DRAFT
at the beginning. Mr. Kuhta said they will work on that on the side and will continue Nvith the schedule,
and when Council feels comfortable in discussing options, those options will be brought forward.
Mayor Ivlunson sa.id Counci] has considered tlie necd for extra meetings, that having altematives is
important, and that timing in getting this completed is not as important as malcing sure it is done correctly.
Council concurred.
6. Advance Agends Additions - vlavnr Munson
In the interest of time, this agenda item was not discussed.
7. Information Onlv: (a) Preliminary Legislative Agenda and Use of Lobbyist, (b) .l.odging TaY
Advisory Committee Request for Release of Funds, and (c) Ttecords Management/Document Imaging
were for informalion only and were not discussed or reported.
8. Council Checlt - in - Maynr Munson
In the interest oftime, this agenda item was not discussed.
9. Citv Manaeer Commeats - Dfave 1Vlercicr
In thc interest of time, ih.is agenda item was not discussed.
EXECUTIVE SESSION: Land Acquisition; Labor Relxtions
It wr.as moved by Depirty iVIcryor Denefnty, secortded and imanimously agreed lo adjourir inta executive
session for apprnximately forty min:ttes to disctiss land acquisition and labor relatiofrs; and that no
uction tivould be taken ufterwards. Council adjourned into executive session at 9:34 p.m. Mayor Aqunson
declared council out of executive session at 10:12 p.m, It was nwved by Mcryor Mimson, secarded and
unartimously ugreed 1a adjourn, The meeting adjourned at 10: 13 p.m.
ATTEST: Richard Muiison, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Study Session Meciing Minutcs: 09-02-48 Page 13 of 17
Approved by Council:
DRAFT
Addendum A .
With Coun.cil agreed changes (sho~Nm in track change format)
City of Spokane Valley-Study Session Agenda
September 2°d 2008 - Law Enforcement Assessment
♦ lntrvduction - Facilitator's rolc, background, procedures for reaching consensus
♦ llesired outcome:
Gather and re-v-iew opcrating data as a precursor to further decision
mal:ing
1. Goals for a study:
1) Determine a scope nf services for assisting the Cit,y ia rcnegutiating a
Law Enfurcement Contract with Spokane County Sheriff
2) Draft a scnpe of services for performing an alternztives analysis
whereby tvc City has option to establish an indepenclent Police
Department.
Tasks to undcrtflke: i. Perform an anxlysis of crimc trencls, identif~ strengths and weaknesses, opportunities or threats
u. IdenYifj, strategic abjectives fnr Spukane Valley law enforcement
iii. Perform a tactical xnalysis of crime statistics, trends and
recommended best dcployment of resources in responsc.
iv. Identify current baseline performance (benchmarking) so sErvice
levels cam be determined and performance measures can be
established.
( v. Others? Revtew o!he positive rn1d negcrtive runa~ficatiotis u reneiving nur
cotrn•ac.t wilh the S{aeriff's Depurtntew
Areas of inquiry or intr.rest (random order). Any corporate additions or delerions?
1) Calls for service based deployment. (wrorklaadl
2) Command and control authority.
3) Risk management.
4) Liability.
5) Performance measures.
\
6) Staffing levels-right sizing.
Study Session Meeting Minutes: 09-02-08 Yage 14 of 17
Approved by CounciL-
DR.9 FT
7) Work schedules.
8) Facilities needs and capaCity.
9) Fleet needs and capacih'.
10) Communications equipment servicc.
11) Sustainable funding.
I 12) Financial impacts-budgctarT considerationsstar-tup-ea4ts ve °s"s
cantrsct escalation.
13) Grant oppurtunitics.
14) Cost efficiencies.
15) Specialty squads
16) SCOpE or similar volunteer program.
17) Property crimes-allocation af resuurres.
18) Dispatch services and priorities.
19) viultiplc vchiele response to scenes.
20) Release of extrx c►n-sccnc uoits.
21) Community oriented policing.
22) Internxl uffxirs.
23) Handling citizens complaints.
24) Et6ics.
25) Hiring Practices.
26) Regional services (specialties)
27) Standardslcertifications (i'VSPA, CCLEA etc.)
28) Trainina
Study Session ivfeeting Minutcs: 09-02-08 Page 15 of 17
Appraved by Council:
~ b
• a
~ . ~
. . .
. .
Note 'I Itle 9/2/2QOB
- S~ 0M-
• _
~ ~ e
~e:c~ _,-v s
a,~_ _ A_c~__ alk a~ ~s"is
addL
~WC-h
._n
=~~u
. f 1►~ ~ ~Qw ~4- ~
~a s
~ • _ _ ~ oy
.
.
,
,
~
;
b
~
~
y
- - - - -
S L
a
~
-Z
DRATT
ivffiYUTES
City of Spolcane Valle.y
City Council Exccutive Session
Tuesday, September 16, 2008
Atterrdmrce:
Councilmembers: Staff:
Dick i7enenn_y, Deputy Mrryor llave Vlercier, Cit), Manaaer
Rose Dempsey, Councilmember Neil Kersten, Public Works 17irector
F3ill Gothmann, Councilm-ember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Gary Schimniels, Councilrnember Kathy N1cClung, Community Developmenl Dir.
Stevc Taylor, GouncilmemUer Mike Connelly, City Attorney
DiFUta Wilhite, Councilmember
Absent: Mayor RicM Munson
EXLCUTIVE SESSIO\;: Iacputy Mayor llenenny called the rneciina to order at 5:00 p.m.
Deputy Mayor Denenriy adjournecl the Executi<<e Session at approxirnatcly 5:55 p.m. There was no
9Cti0n Cal:en.
•
Uick Uenenny, Deputy Mayor
A'Cf EST:
Christine Bainhriclge, City Clerk
f
J
Coimoil Minutes: 09-16-08 Page I af I
Approvcd by Coundl:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 9-23-2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑new business ❑ public hearing
Z admin. report Z pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading - Proposed Ordinance 08-019 confirming a 6.39%
increase in the 2008 property tax levy for collection during the 2009 calendar year.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State budget law
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The 2009 proposed revenues were presented to the
City Council at a public hearing on July 22. The public was invited to offer comment at that
hearing.
A second public hearing was held on September 9 to consider the 2009 budget including
property tax revenue. The first reading of this ordinance was on September 9 as well.
BACKGROUND: State budget law requires we make our revenue projections known and
~ conduct public hearings to consider input from the public. At the public hearings on July 22, and
September 9, special mention was made of property taxes.
The City is required to pass an ordinance expressing our desire to levy a 6.39% annual increase
in the property tax levy.
This 6.39% property tax increase ($631,060) is included in the property tax ordinance and was
discussed at both public hearings.
OPTIONS: State law requires an ordinance be passed confirming our desire to levy the
allowable increase in property tax. A second option would be for the council to decide not to
pass the ordinance and reduce the budget accordingly.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance 08-019 confirming the
City's desire to levy a 6.39% increase in the property tax ordinance.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed ordinance increases the city property tax levy
by $631,060 for 2009 operations.
STAFF CONTACT: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 08-019
~
~ C]TY OF SPOKA~\~ ~'ALL.~,Y
- SPOKANT:. CQUNTX R'ASHT.~~TC:TON
ORDINANCE NO. 08-019.
AN O1tllINANCE OF TiCE CITY UF SPUKANE VALLEY, WASHL\'GT'ON, CONFIRNILNG
THE Cl'1'Y PROPERTY TAX LEN'Y AT 6.39% ($631,060) liV EYC:ESS Ox' 1HE, 2007 AD
VALnFLEM PROPERTY TAX LEN'Y VVHIC.H R'AS CnLLECTEA IN THF CiTY 2008 FISCAL
YEAIt, PURSUANT TO RCW 84.55.120, PRC)N'IDING F4R SEVERART[,TTY,
AlST AN FFFFCTTVF DATF
WHERFAS, State law authorizes the City of Spokane Valley to levy regular property taxes upon
lhe taxable propert}' within tlie Cit), limits in order to provide revenue for the annual Current Expens-c
Budget of the Gity;
VI'HFRFAS, Tnitiafive 747 (RCVV Chapter 84.55) provided that cities wid1 a population of over
10,000 pcrsons c.an increase the amount of their regular property taxes annually by the lesser arnount of
inflation or I% of the highest la«<ful levy, plus any additional <<<ilue resulting from ncw construction,
improvements and state lssessed property;
WI-IEREAS, an increase in properfy tax revenuc may bc authorized by the City through adoption
of a separate ordinance, pursuant to nntiee, specifically tiuthorizing the increase stated in terms of dollars
and percentage.
~ NOW TH.E;REFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washingt:on, do ordain as
fallows:
Sectioo 1. Pur ase. The purpose of this Ordinance is to utilize excess levy capacit), of the
Cily that resultcd from the tax levy in 2007 for the 2008 fiscal year. State law aut:horizes the City to
increase its property taxes above the highest Iiiwful allnwable levy in a prccecling year plus new
construction, irnprovements and assessment nf State owned properey. T}ie taxcs received from the
increaVsed levry of $631;060 set forth herein, which zire included in t.he regular proper _ty tax levy of
S 10,500,000 levied through Ordinance 08-020 are appronriateci in the 2009 City I3udget, adopted through
Ordinance 08-020.
Section l. Findin;s.
A. 7"he Cily, following public hearings, aclopted a balaneed Cui•i-ent Expense Budget that
scts fqrth citizen priorities and promotes the health, welfare and safety of the Cir}'.
B. The City published notiee of t.his (?rdinanee through the procedurc used to notify the
public of regular Council meetings.
C. To support tlie adopted Current Expense I3udget of the City and pravide for the delivery
of services, the making of improvements ana the promotion of t}ie health, welfare and
safe .ty of the citizens, the City Council, After considering the finaneial requirements of
the City for 2009, finds and deterrnincs that there is substantial need to; include the
6.39% increase ($631,060) allowed by Stace law, Nvithin the ad valorem property tax levy
. of S10,500;000 which was adopted by the City Council on Septernber 23, 200$ through
Ordinance 08-020.
OrdiTtance 08-019
Additional PropTae Page 1 of2
Section 3. 639% Increase.. 1'ursuant to RCW 84.55, the CiCy, by aclopting
Ordinance 08-019, imposed a.n inercase in the regular properly tax levy (in adcfition to the inereaSE
resulting from the adciition of new constructiori, improvemerits and thc increased value of State assessed
property); in the amount of S631,060 whieh is a percentage increase of 6.39% from the 2007 Ad Valorem
Property 1ax Levy, which was collected in the City 2008 Fiscal Year.
Section 4. Citv Clerk. '1'he City Clerk shall certify a copy of this Ordinance and for-ward
the same to the }3oard of County Commissioners anci the Spokane County Assessors Offce upon its
passage.
Section S. Seve~. lf any section, senl:cnce, clause, or phrase of t.his ordinance should
be held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect. tlie validity or constitutionaliry of
any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this orcfinance.
Scction 6. EffecCive Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after
publication of this ordinance or a summary t}iereof in the of-ficial newspaper of the City as provictcd by
law.
Passed by t:hc City Counail of the City of Spokane Valley on )2008.
Mayor, Richard Munson , - ,
A7fiF ST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clcrk
Approved as to I=orm:
Office of the Ciry At[arne-y
I7ate of Publication:
Fffective Date:
Ordinsnce 08-019
Additianal PropTax Pagc 2 of2
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 09/23/2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent [I old business (D new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information N admin. report 0 pending legistation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Property Tax Ordinance 08-020 for 2009
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: State Law
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: There has been discussion regarding the anticipated
amount of property tax revenue and the property tax rate for the 2009 budget. Public hearings
were held on July 22 and September 9, to review 2009 projected revenues, including the
property tax levy.
The first reading of this ordinance was held September 9.
An additional public hearing will be held in October to discuss the 2009 proposed budget which
includes proposed property taxes.
1
J BACKGROUND: State law requires the City to pass an ordinance in order to levy property
taxes. The City is lirnited to a maximurn of $3.60 per thousand dollars of assessed value, less
the highest levy rate authorized by a fire district within the city limits of the City of Spokane
Valley and less the library rate within the City of Spokane Valley.
The City considered levying $1.60 per thousand dollars of assessed value which is the amount
authorized under state law for municipal purposes. A review of City budget needs and the
increase in assessed value now indicates the City levy will be closer to $1.53/per thousand
dollars of assessed value. The actual rate for the City will not be known until January of 2009
when final assessed value calculations are available.
OPTIONS: An ordinance is required by law. The council could levy an amount less than that
proposed, and reduce the budget an equal amount.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Motion to approve Ordinance 08-020 to levy property
tax for the 2009 budget.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: This ordinance levies property tax for the City's 2009 budget
year. Staff expects property tax revenues to be near $10.5 million once growth in assessed
value and the allowable increase in the tax levy have been included. Property taxes make up
22% of General Fund revenues and beginning fund balance.
STAFF CONTACT: Finance & Admin. Services Director, Ken Thompson
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALL;EY
~=J SPQK.ANF CQiJNTY, WASI3INGT0\`
Oltll]NANCE N4. 08-020
As ORnTNANCE OF TttE C1TY OF Sl'OKANE VALi.,FY, VVASUINGTON, LEVYL~`G
THi: REGULAR PRQPER'I'Y Tr1XES FOR TIM Cl°l°Y OF SPQKANE VALLEY,
VVASFII~`GTON li\' SPOKANF CQUiNTI'Y I'012 THE YE:llt COMMFNCIn°G
JANOATtY 1, 2009 TQ PRQVIDE REVENUE FOR CITY SERViCFS AS SET l+`'OHTH
Lq .T..HF CiTY BUUGET.
WI-IEEZEAS, State law aut}iorizes the City of Spokane ValleV to levy regular proper1:y taxcs upon
the taxable property within the corporate limits in orcler to provide revenue for the 2009 Geneeal 1'und
budget of the City; and
WF-iEREAS, the City oi' Spokane Valley is authorized to levy $3.60 per tliousand dollars of
assessed vziluaeion deducting therefrom the highest lcvy c411e.cted by aFire District wiihin the Spokane
Valle_y city limits and also dcclucting the Spokane Valley Library Taistrict levy; and
WHFRrAS, EtCW 54.52.020 requires the City Couneil an or before the 30"' day of November to
certify budget estimates to the clerk of the Spokane County 13oard of Commissioners including amounts
to be raised by taxing property within the l'►mits of the City; and
Wl-lEftEAS, the City Cowicil pursuant to not.ice, }icld public hearings an July 22, September 9
ancl anl.ieiptites a hearing on October 14, 2008 on the proposed buclael estirnates for 2009 inclucling
revenue sources which wil) fund the provisinn of City scrvices, projects and activities.
NOW, TI-IFREF0RE, the CiCy Council ofthe Ciri, of Spokane Valley, Washington; do ordain as
fo I 1 ows:
Section 1. 2009 T.evv Rate. There shall be and is hercby levied and impnsed upon real
property, personal property and utility properiy, as defined in RC\W Chapter 84.02 and 84.55.005 in the
City oF Spokanc VAlleY, Washington a rebular property tax for the year commericing January l, 2009 in
the total amnunt of 510,500,000. It is re.c4gnized the Cit}' af Spokanc Valley can levy S3.60 per thousand
dollsrs of assessed value less the highest fire district levy within the Cit}= of Spokane Valley and le:ss the
library districl levy.
"I'he reoular property ta.~ levieci through t}~is ordinance is for the purpose af receiving revenue tc~
make payment upon the generzl indebtedness of thc Ciry of Spokaiie Valley, the general fund obligations
and for the paymenc of services; projects and activities for the City during the 2009 c<tlenctar year. The
purpose of this ordinancc is to establish the levy Mount as permitted hy law.
The City expects the dollar amount of the properh' tax levy to be $10,500,000 w}iich is $631,060
greater (6.39%) than the 2007 levy which was collected in 2008.
Section 2. Notice to Spokane C:ountv. Pursuant to RCW 84.52.020; the City Clerk sliall
certify to the County Legislative Authority a true and correct eopy of this ordinance, as well as the budget
estirnntes adopted by the City Council in order to pravide for and direct the taxes levied herein that shall
be collected and paid to the City of Spokane Valley at the time ar►cl in the manner provided by the laws of
\ __J the State of Wastiington.
Otclinanoe 03-020 Property Tar Pagc 1 of 2
SecHon 3. Severability. If any scction, sentence, clause or phrase of this oedinance shall
be held to be invalid or U11COI1SililJhO(13l Vy a court of compctent jurisdiction, sueh invalidiry ar .
uneonstitutionality shall not affect t}ie validiry or constitutionally of any other sectinn, scntence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be iri full force and effect five (5) days afier
publication of this Urdinanee or a summary thereof in thc official newspaper of lhe City as provided by
laxv.
PASSED by the City Council this day of September, 2008.
iVlayor, Richard M. vtunson
ATTCST:
Cit}' Clerk, Christine Bainbridge
Approved As To Form:
Office nf the C;ity Attorney
Date of I'ublication:
Fffective Uate:
Ordin3nce 08-020 Propcm, Tsx Yagr 2 of 2
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
J Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: ChECk all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Resolution 08-020 Pilot Flex-Time Program Proposal for Non-
represented Employees
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201-219; RCW 70.94,
Washington Clean Air Act; RCW 49.46 Washington Minimum Wage Act
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report September 16, 2008
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this action is to propose the trial use of flexible schedules for
non-represented employees of the City. This proposal is being requested consistent with the
City's commitment to support the Commute Trip Reduction Program, the reduction in use of
~ fossil fuels by employees, to increase the productivity of City employees leading to the
enhancement of services provided to our customers and to support City employees by
recognizing their career interests and life-style situations.
Research shows organizations can achieve multiple benefrts without incurring additional
expense by implementing flexible schedules for their employees. Such benefits, in addition to
reducing energy consumption and environmental impacts are increased employee satisfaction,
increased employee retention and higher productivity.
Staff recommends the establishment of flexible schedules for non-represented employees.
OPTIONS: Provide additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Approve Resolution 08-020, Pilot Flex Time
Proposal
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None.
STAFF CONTACT: John Whitehead, HR Manager
ATTACHMENTS
J
DRAF7'
CITY OF SPOKANE VAL•LEY
SPQK.ANE COUNTY, VVASACN'GT0N
RESOLUTION \'O.OS-020
A RESOLUTIO\7 ADOPThNG AND AUTAORIZfiNG THE I~1~PLEMENTATION OF A
P11AT PROGItAM FOR FLEXIBLE SCI3EDUI.ING OF VVQRK HOURS FOR
CE12TA .i i EMPLUYEES FOR TAE CITY OF SPOKANF VALLEY.
`VfEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance 03-044 in 2003 outlining the basic personnel
policies for City employees; and
NVEEREAS, Ordinance 03-044, Section 1(C) states, in pertinent part, that personnel polices that
relate to wages, benef_tts and conditions of employtnent shall be submitted to the City Council for review
and approval; and
WHEREt1S; the City bas begun to research work hnur programs being i_mplemented by other
jurisdictioiis, and is interested in testing several flexible work hour programs on a limited basis.
\fOM TF1EREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, `Vashington, as follows:
Section 1. Adoption of Pilot Proeram for Flexible Schctluling of Work Hours fnr Certain
~ Employees, ancl Authorizing Implementation of Same. The City of Spokane Valley hereby creates a pilot
program for flexible scheduling of work hours for certaiti employees, consistent tivitli the ternis outli.ned
in Appendix A to this Resolution. The City ylanager is further aut}iorized to implement the pilot
program pursuant io an appropriate administrativre policy and procedure. It is anticipated t1fat the pilot
progracn will be evaluated no latcr ihitn December 31, 2009.
Sectiun 2. Fffective Date. This kesolution shall be effeclive upon adoption.
- Adopted this day of $eptcmber, 2008.
City of Spokane Valley
Ma}ror lticliard Munson
ATTEST:
CiCy Clerk, Ch.ristine Bainbeidae
Appror•ed as to Form:
Ofrice of the Ciry Attorney
Resolution 08-020 Pilot Flex Time Paje 1 of 1
DRAFT: DUCUMENT FOR DiSCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
~~~Administrative Policy & Procedare No. 200.050
C ~~a ai
jFlexible ~dl~ Hours for Employees-Non Represented
1. POLICY
The City pramotcs energy conservation, preserving our cntirironment and supporting City
employees to cnhanee productivity and job satisfaction through the utilizatinn of
compressed work schedules for nan-represented employers of the City.
2. REFERENCES
a) Fair Labor Standards Act, 24 U.S.C. 201-219
b) City Policy No. 200.045,
c) RCW 70.94, Washington Clean Air Act
d) RCW 49.46 NN'ashington Minimum Wage Act
3. DCSCRIPTION AND 1MPLE.titENTATION
s)Trial Bash. The usage of flexible compressed schedules will be on a trial basis. The
City w711 tvaluate the impacts these schedules have on the productivity of sta.ffand the
services provided to the community. In the event a conflict betwoea the work of the City
and thcse schedulcs becomes apparenl, priorit}' %tiill be give to the serti•ices provided hy
City employees.
b)Ty-pes of Sc6edules. Other than the City's normal schedule of 8:00 am to S:OU pm,
Monday through Friday defined in City Policy 204.045, the City may approve or requirr
the following compressed work schedules far emptoyees,
l. 4(four) days per wcek, 10 (ten) hours per day work day with 3 (three ) dciys
off in each work week.
2. 9(nine) day s of work in two defined work weeks. (4 (four) consccutive 9
(nine) hour wark days repeated each week with an addidonal 8(eight) hour
wor{► day in alternating wceks.
3. A cocnbinaiion of working hours thnt allow for supervision of convactars
providing services to the City.
c)Reqnests for iiezible achedules. Emplayees of the city may subnut in writing to the
City Manager or Deputy City Manager requests to have their respcctive schedules
changed to onc of the uptions above. The request shall include t}le follow-ins;:
1. Tve requeste,d schedule;
2. The critzria that %a111 be measured tu evaluate pmductivity.
Policy Na 200.050 Flexiblt ►Iours for E:mploycrs Pdgc 1 nf
Effective
»RAFT: «Oc'tinlFNT FOEZ DiSCUS;iOti PUR~~~_~Sr.` OtiLN
3. A plau to ensurr services the employee and work unit provides to thc C:it) wzll
not decrease;
4. The desired effective date of the new schedule;
5. A written acknowledgement b}, the employee stating they understand th,
effects the proposed schedule v►1ll have on their leave usage, and if ap;pr~
the schedule may be changed at anytime by the City.
6. A statement provided by the employee's depaztmcnt director supporcii r_ u,.
requested schetiule and addressing the approval criteria in section 3(d) b:-'.
d)Consideration. After receiving a rcquest for a schedule change, the City Manager,.,r
Deputy ('ity Manaeer will evaluate each reque,,;~t individuail.• hased unon the fnliov, ; v-.
rritci
1. . . ~ ; . ,t_ . t
2. The messurements to be used to evaluate the schedulc.
3. The amount of service time thc employee has with the Civ~ and in ihcir
current position.
4. The demands and schedules associated with the employee's work unic
5. The amount of stipen-ision the position'employee reqtiirzs and the avaiiubilitN
(if the supervisor.
e) Approvai.
1. lt is the Citv's tiolc authorit) W approv< <>r dtny flexiblr schrclulcs.
2. 1'he City Manager or I?eputy City Managcr will provide a written respon~v ti)
rcquests for flexiUle schedules.
3. Appmved flexible schedules are subject to reti7ew and reconsidrratior.i.
inditi7dua11y or collecdvely, at an}• time by, management.
nSupervisory Responsibility. Supenisors wiU maintain cam-tant o% ersigiit tt ~ cn•ucc
cu-qomer sen7ce and productivity are maintained und employees are workin,~! ~~hcn tilL `
~
:1rc ~~1~__i~..,~•,i
g)LeaNe Usage ancl HulidaN,. \1 h~:r Lili :r,lpl,~~~~C 01_ aEi apprl'\C.1 _chc:iui:
vacation leave ur lcAVe w-ithout pay, thc Cmployec will ae cluuged fur lhe amount eyu.:'.
to the hours that would havc been worked if not on leave. Similarly, if a holida}• fa1L ~a regular working day of the employce, the employee rtceives 8(eight) hours of pa} .
'I"he emrloyee must either work or use vacation leave for the remainder. R'hen a Cit_,
holiday falls on a reguler day off, the supervisor of the employee w•ill designate anoff,
day as the emplnvee's holiday. Efforts %tiill hc made to place the designated holiday
ucljacent to a r,.
C'itv scheifule.
City Manager,Deputy City Manager
. . . , . _
E fl zccivo
Nine Day, Eighty Hour Schedule
(9/80)
Example
Current
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
8 houm 8 hours 8 hours 8 houm 8 hours 8 houm 8 hours 8 houm 8 hours 8 hours
Workweek Divide
9/80 Schedule
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday F' ay Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
9 houm 9 hours 9 hours 9 houts ~ 9 hours 9 hours 9 houm 9 hours Regular
Day QH
Workweek Divide
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEIf
Reques# for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sig n-off'
Item: Check aIk that apply; ❑ consen# ❑ old business (E new business ❑ public hearing
❑ informakion [Z adrnin. report ❑ pending Iegislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Changes to #he Fee Resalution
GDVERIVING LEGISLATION: 7he current resolution is 07-017 u+hich was passeti in Dctober of
2007, and was effective January 1, 2008.
PREIfIOU3 COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Each year the council passes a resalution to adjust
#ees so that rnast city costs can be recoveeed #or services provided to others. Staff also
recomrnends the deketGOn and additian of fees when condi#ions warrant tYre change_
BACKCROUND: Staff has reviewed the propased changes and grouped them into three
categories~
1. Additians - rrsw fees
2. Changes to existing fees
3. A cost of living increase on all fees
OPTLONS: Options include; 1) Direct staff to proceed with an updated resalution; 2) Proceed
with same of the fee changes; 3} Do not rnake arry changes
RECOMMENDED IS►CTION OR MOTIOIV: Consensus to prQceed with changes and advance ta
the October T, 2008 council meeting for additional discussion,
BllDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: An increase in city revenue (up to $80,000), to cover
increased costs, is expected during 2009,
STAFF CONTACT; I{en Thompson, Finance Direc#or
i
~
~
~
CITY OF SPOKANF; VALI.EX
.:S~'OKANF COU''['Y, WASAINGTON
1ZESOLIITION NO. 07-017
A 12ESOLUTION OF, TAF CITY UF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKAAT C()UNTY,
WASHTNGTQN, AMENllTNG RESOLUTION 06-024, AND APPROVING .AN
A1VIENi)ED AZASTER FEE SCEEDULE
WHERFAS, it is the general policy of the City to establish fees that are reflective of the cost of
services provided by the City; and
WHER,EAS, the City uses a resolution to establish fees for City programs, permits and serviees,
and periodically, the fee resolulion must be updated to incorporate new or modified scrvices; and
WHEREAS, Counci) desires to modify the Resolution and accompanying Fee Schedule.
NOW THERFrORE, be it resolved by tlle City Council of the City of SpoF:ane Valley, Spol:ane
• County, Washington,as follows:
Sectian 1. '1'he changes needed at this lime are incqrporaced inlo the attaeheci scheclules, and
include (1) preliminary and final short plat fees; final binding site plan feES; and new fees fnt zoning
lecters and quick turnaround pe•rmits.
Seetion 2. Repeal. To the extent that previous fee schedules are inconsistent with those set
~ forth herein, they are repealed. C~
Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect on January 1,
2008.
, ApprAVed dlis 23'd day of October, 2007.
ATTEST: CITY QF SPOKANE VAI.,T.,EY
C-hristine Bainbridge, City Clerk Diana Wilhite, Ma}~or
Approved as to form:
~
Oftice of the City Attomey
i
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolutinn for 2008 Page 1 of 18
NIASTER FEE SCIiEDULE Fee Schedule Page No.
Schedule A: Development 3
Schedule B: Building 5
Schedule C: Fire Code 13
Schedule D: Parks & Recreation 16
Schedulc E: Administrative 19
Schedule F: Other Fees 20
~ i
Resolution 07-017 Fee 12esolution for 2008 Page 2 of 18
' ` . MASTER FEE SCH:EDULE
- Schedule A - DEVELOPMENT
aMLNllMErcTS Comprehensive Ylan xmendment S1,500.00
Zoning or other code text amendment S1,500.00
APl'EA:LS
Appeal of Administrative Decision S1,000.00 .
APpeal of H.earing Examiner finclinss $300.00
TranscripUrecord deposit fee on appeals ufHeitring $150.00
EYamincr's decisions
Appeul of determinatinn made pursuant to SVNIC 5500.00
10.30.150-.660
ENVTRONIV.IE\"TAL RF VIEVV
State Environmenta! Policy Act (SEPA) .
Single dwellinh (when required) $100.00 , -
All other developments $350.00
Envirc►nmental Impact Statement (FTS) Review $2,200.00
Acldenda of existing EiS Review $350.00
Shoreli.ne
SubstHnti.il Development Permit $800.00
Critical Areas $300.00
Floodplain Perinit SSO.UU 1'cr lai
PERivIITS Homc Occupation Pcrmit S80.00
Cunditional Use Permit $800.00
Tcmporsry Use Pcrctiit $150.00
PLATS
Sttbdivisions Preliminary plat $2,324 Plus $40.00 pcr lot
Final plat $1,424 Plus 510.00 per lot
Short Plats
Preliminary 2-4 lots 51,224
' ~Final Plat 2-4 Lots $924
: 1'rcliminary plat 5-9 Lots $1,424 Plus $25.00 per lot
Resolueion 07-017 Fee itesolution for 2008 Page 3 of 18
Final Plat 5-9 Luts $1,224 Plus $10.00 per lat
1'lat Alteration
Subdivision plut $650.00
Shnrt plat $265.00
• Binding SiYe Plan
Binding sitc plan moditication S1,474
Change uf Conditions . $650.00
Preliminary binding site Plan $1,674 '
Final binding site plan $924
AggregationlSegregation
Lot line adjusYment $1.00.00
Lot line eliminaHon $100.00
Zero lot line $100.00 I'lus S10.00 per Iot
SIGvS
Review of permanent sign $50.00 Plus $25.00 if Public
Works reAew is
needed
Revicw oi'temporary sign $50.00
Sl'I'E PLAiN RE VIEW $550.00
STRFFT VACATION AP.PIdICA'['ION $1,300.00
VARIANCES
Administrative • 5300.00
Yublic Aearings $1,5Q0.0Q
Z0NIiNG
Zoning map amcndments (rezone)* $11650.00
PU17 plitn $1,500.00 Plus S25.00 per lot
PUU modification $500.00
Goning leller $200.00
*If rezone is combined with otber action(s), cost of
othcr aclion(s) is additionHl.
Note: "Ihe Building Official is authoriied to rcquire the permit applicant to provide fee
reimbursement to the City of Spokane Valley for any professional services required outside of
City staff review. Soine examples of potential ouCSide resources include plan review,
construction inspection and surveying. Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 4 of 18
I .
~ Schedule B - BUIL',DI,NG
The buildin; code permit fees are collected at the titnE of the issuance of the building permit.
Other fecs arE also to be collected at the time of thc issuing of the building permit. Each
department for Nvhom the fee is collected is to advise the pcrmit speeialist of fees due.
GRADIrTG
1'ermit Fees
Cubic Yards FEL
100 or less $20.00
101 to 1,000 $20.00 for the first 100 Cu. Yd., plus $7.00 for
each additional 100 Cu. Yd.
1,001 to 10,000 . $83.00 for the first 1,001 Cu. Yd., plus $6.00 for
eaeh additiona11,000 Cu. Yd.
10,001 to 100,000 $147.00 for the first 10,000 Cu. Yd. plus $15.00 for
each additional 10,000 Cu. Yd.
100,001 to 200,000 $368.00 for the first 100,000 Cu. Yd. plus $15.00
for each additional 100,000 Cu. Yd.
200,000 or mUrc $503.00 for the first 200,000 Cu. Yd. plus $15.00
for each xdditiona1200,000 Cu. Yd.
~
Plans Checking Fecs
Cubic Xards FEE
5() or Icss No fcc
51 rn 100 $12.00
101 to 1,000 S20.00 1.,001 to 10,000 S25.00
10,001 to 100,000 525.00 for the tirst 1.0,000 Cu. Yd. plus $7.00 for
. each additional 10,000 Cu. Yci.
100,001 tu 200,000 $98.00 for the first 100,000 Cu. Yd. plus $6.00 for
cach additional 100,000 Cu. Yd. .
200,001 or more $158.00
Taancl Clearing only (without earth being moved) S65.00
Paving Permit (greater than 5,000 ST' - new paving only) S250.00
i
Rcsolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 5 of 18
i ~
STRUCTURAI.. CODF
Building permit fees for each projeet are sel by the followinD fee schedule. The table below is to be used
to determine the building permit Fees r►ncf plans cheQk fees based on the value of the conskruction wrork as
stated by the applicant or the value calculated by the Building Official using the latest valuation data
published in the Building.SafetyJournul by the international Code Council, whichever valuc is greatest.
Valuation Table
Total Valuation ree
$1 to $25,000 $69.25 for the first S2,000 plus $14 fc>r each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, up tu and
inrluding $25,000
S25,001 to $50,400 $391.25 for the first $25,000 plus $10.10 for eftch
additianstl $1,000, or frxetion thereof, up to and
incluciing S50,000
SSO,OOa_ to $1.00,000 $643.75 for the lirst $50;000 plus $7 far each
additional $1,000, or fraction thereof, up to and
including $1011,000
$100,001 to $500,000 S993.75 for the first $100,000 plus 55.60 for each
additional 51,000, or fraction thereof, up to and
including $500,000
$500,001 tt~ $1,000,000 $3,233.75 for the first $500,000 plus $4.75 for each
additional $1,000, or fraction therec,f, up to and
including $1,000,000
S1,000,000 and up $5,608.75 for the first S1,000,000 plus $3.15 for cach xdditional $1,000, or fraction thereof
Valuatihn Exceptions Fee Per
Square Foot
Private garages (wood fraine) S19.00
Private glrages (masonry) S22.00
Pole buildings $19.00
Open carport, clecks, porches $1.5.00
4ver the caunter, quick turnarouncl permit fees for simple projects, an additional $58.00
Plans Review Fees
F'or other than signs, one vnd two family resiclential structures and the associated accessory buildings or
struchires, a 1'lans Review Fee Deposit of $200 shall be collected at the time of accepta.nce of the
Building Perrnit Application. The application shall be accepted only when the applicatian is determined
Io be complete by Cit), staff.
For signs, one and ttivo Family residential slructures ancl the associatcd accessory builclinbs or structures,
no plan review deposit will be required at the timc of Building Pcrmit Application submiital.
The balance Af the Plan Review Fee shall be collected at the time of Building Permit issuance along with
the WSBCC Fee. Any execss deposit collected during the appliaation nrocess shall be appliecl to the
Building Perrnit Pee.
Resolution 07-0 l7 Fce Resolution for 2008 Paje 6 of 18
i ~
Plans Review Fees are not refundable once the plan review has been started. Plans Review Fees are
addilional to Auildina Permit Fees.
Plans review fee (;eneral) 65% Of bldg permit fee
Plans review fee - Group R-3 nccupstncies (single 40% p1' blclg permit fee
famil,y less than 7,999 sq. ft.)
Flans revicw fec - Group R-3 occupancies (single 65"/o Of bldg permit fec
family 8,000 sq. ft. or greater)
1'luns review fee -U-1 nr U-2 occupancies (sheds, 25% Of bldg permit fee
barns, ctc.)
Plant review fee - temporary tent or structure 25% Of bldg permit fee
lnitial Plan Review Fees shall be carped at $35,000 maximum with the following exception:
Exception # 1:
If acidi[ional professional resources are required for individual project plan revicw for ihose projects that
reach dhe maximum Plan Review Fee, thc Building Offcial shall be authorized to require the permit
applicant to provicle those resouroes to the City of Spol:ane Valley.
Tf a set of plans xlreacly checked antl approved is resubmitted by the owner or hisJhcr agent, an hourly rate
of $58.00 will be npplied for the re-review.
PLUMBING CODE
~ 'I he plunibing code fees will be collected when the associated permit is issued. !f the plumbing is .
includcd in the Building Permit the unit eosts are added, but not the basic plumbing pcrmit fee.
A. a3asic fees
1) Basic fee for issuing each permit $35.00
2) Basic for eacli supplemental permit $7.50
•
B. Unit fces (in addiYion to the b9sic fee)
a) For each_ plumbing fixlure on a trap (including $6.00
garbagc disposals, dish waslicrs, back flow
device, clrainage, hot tubs, built in watcr
suftener, water closets, lavatorics, sinks, drains,
ctc )
2) Private sewage disposal system $20.00
3) Watcn ceater $6.00 E9ch
4) Industrial waste pre.treahnent interceptor $15.00
indudin; itS trap and venl, except kitc6en type
grease interceptors functioning 9s fixture traps. •
5) Repsir or alteratiori ofwater piping, drainage $6.00 Each fixture
ur vent piping
6) Atmospheric type vacuum breaker $6.00 Each
7) Bacltflow protective device other than $6.00 Each
atmospheric type vacuum breakers
8) Medical gas $6.00 Per outlet
9) Interceptors $6.00 F,ach
;
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 7 of 18
~ i
NiECHAn`ICAL COllE .
TMe mechanieal cocle fees will be eollected when the associated perntit is issued. Tf it is included in the ~
Builcling Yermit, the unit costs are added, but not the basic mechanical pcrmit fee.
A. Basic fees
J) }3asie fee for issuing each permit $35.00
2) Basic for cach supplcmental permit $7.50
B. iJnit fees (in acidition ta the laasic fee)
1) Furassces S suspended heaters - lnstallation or
rclocation
a. up to and incluclinb 100,000 btu $12.00
b. aver 100,000 btu $15.00
' 2) lauct work system $10.00
3) Hcat pump & air conditioner
a. 0 to 3 tnns $12,00
b. over 3 to 15 tons $20.00
c. ovcr 15 to 30 tons $25.00
cl. over 30 to 50 tons $35.00
c. ovcr*50 tons $60.00
4) Gas water Iieater $10.00
5) Gas piping system $1.00 Pcr outlet
G) Gss log, fireplace, and gas insert installation $10.00
7) Applixnce vents insullation; relocation; $10.00 Eacli
replacement 8) 12epairs or a(lditions $15.00 , -
9) Boilers, compressors, and ahsorption systems
a. 0 to 3 hP - 1.00,000 btu or less $12.00
b. Over 3 to1.5 hp -.1.00,001. to 500,000 btu S20.00
c. C3vcr 15 - 30 hp - 500,001. to 1,000,000 525.00
btu
d. ovcr 30 hp -1,000,001 to 1,750,000 btu $35.00
e. ovcr SO hP - over 1,7511,0UU btu $60.00
10) Air Hsndlcrs
a. Facli unit uP to 10,000 cfrn, including S12.00
ducts
b. Each unit over 10,000 cfm 515.00.
11) Evaporative Coolers (other than porti►ble) S]O.OU
- 12) Ventilation and cxhaust
a. Esch fan cc>nnected to a single duct $10.00
b. Each ventilation systein $12.00
c. Each hood served by mechanical cxhaust $12.00
13) Incincrators
a. Installatic►n or relocation nf residcntial $19.00
b. InstallaNon or relocation of commercial $22.00 .
14) Appliances, cach $10.00
15) Unlisted applianccs
a. iinder 400,000 btu $50.00
b. 400,000 btu or over S100.00 '
i
Rcsolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 8 of 18
t ~
~
Lfi) Hood
a. Typc X $50.00
b. "Type 11 $10.00
17) L P Storage #ank 510.00
18) Wood or Pellet stove inseet S10100 '
19) Wood stove system - free ststndi ng S25.00
ENYRG~.' ~~~E
Energy Cade Plans check fee is also establislied to check ta meet thc requi% menls oFRC:W 51-11 WAC.
'Fhese are in a.ddition to the Building Codc .Fces. If City Enspec:lors are assigned to veeify- Energy FLis,
the following fees apply, if an autside eiiergy inspector is required, that fce will be determined by the
outside agenc}r and thc fees below will not apply.
Residential Rem.odelfAdditioo $
New Siogle Family S-0- '
Tenant improvcmcnt '
A. 0 to 10,000 sgaarc fcet $33.00
B. 10,001 squarc fcct and ovcr $45.00 ~I
C. Multi-Family $60.00 Per buildiiig
D. A1ew Commercial and industrial $90.00
O1'HER BUYLDTNG CODE PRE5
~ Approach Permit $50.00
i}ernOliticsn Permit
Siugle Family Rcsidcncc $44.00 'Corrimercial huildingq $125.00 '
Gurage or accessoey bttilding associated wi#h st $20.00
resid ence or ro mni ercisl huildinb
! Early Start Agreements (Foundations) 2 5 % Of bldg permit fee
i
Right-nf-way Pcrmit:
~ Category
1 A1on-cut obstructiun withou# clcan-op S70
2 Non-eut obstruction with clean-up $1.05
3 Yavement cut obstruction non-winter $160
, 4 Favement ent nbstruction, wiQter $200
5 Laag-duration or large p rojects S160
A traffic contral plan review is required if more than ,
5D°l, nf the wid#h of any strcet is closcd ar if a single I
arterial lane is clnsed. Plan review fee $50
I'Resolution 07r017 Fee Rcsolution for 2008 Page 9 of 18 I
i 1
If a cstegory 5permit requires aciclitional time, the , .
ficlditional fee is $40 for each additional3 days or part
thereAf.
`~iultiple-use and long-duration permits shall require a
minimum deposit of S1,000
Sign Fees
T'ees collected for a sia permit and a plans check fee for signs erected in accorclance with the Sign Code.
The fee below plus the WSBCC fee of $4.50.
Sigos mountccl on huildings $45.00
Sign and pole moundng $65.00
Temporary Cerlifcate of Occupancy $50.00
Washington State Building Code Council (W.S.B.C.C.) Surcharge
A flat fee of $4.50 will be collected on cach permit for approved plans or any other permit that is issued in
accordance with the Spokane VaIley 13uilding Code. EXCEPT: For multi-family projects, the fee is $4.50
fnr the first living unit and $2.00 for each additional unit. 'I"he City Pinance llepartment will forward this
fee to the VI'SBCC on a quarterly basis.
. OTHFR vI1SCELLANT40US FEES
A. N,or City personnel
1) Hourly rate set for City Employees (unless $58.00
othenvise specified)
2) C)vertime charges ' . 1.5 times regular .
rate '
B. H«urly rate for contracted sen, ices Set nccnrding to
coniract ratc
C. House Moving l+cc
1) Class l., IT, :incl 111- Movi.ng Permit S60.00
2) Class I, II, and III. - Inspection fee , $60.00
3) Class IV (if already permitted by Spokane S-0-
County or Spokane City)
**f'Ius S'58.00 per huur• after the Is` hour, and $.50 per mile if the builciing to be moved into tjie
Ciry is otrtside the City limits
~
Resolution 07-017 1'ee Resolution for 2008 Paee 10 of 18
D. Work on any structure or building without a
permit if a Spokaoe Vallcy Pcrmit is required:
1) 1Viinimum investigative inspection fee $55.00
2) Total investigative fee to be equal tu the permit fee determined for the value of the
illegal work accomplished
E. Excess inspections for agiven project created by SSti.UO 1'cr iaspecdon or
the developer, owner or contractor re-inspection
F. Condominium conversion plans review/inspection Based on valuc of
fee project and bldg
code valuation
G. Fnclosing sn existing cleck or patio
1) Plans chcck fee 40% Of the basic fee for
plans examination
2) Basic permit fee Based on value of
project; minimum
$3,004
H. Swimming pools (Uver 5,000 gallons) S50.00 plus plumbing fees
1. Re-roof Permit: Fee based nn the v11ue of the project. No plan review fee will be charged -
unless plans are submitted for review.
J. Change of Use or Occupaney Classification permit S58.00
K. Towers, elevated taaks, antennas $ascd on value of
project
~
BUII.,A7
~G CODF FEE RFFUNI) POLTCX
No 1'ermit Fee refund is allowed once the work has been started. If a refu►id is rcquested, the request shgll
be addressed to the T3uilding Official in wrrting, and shall be received aY the Spokane Valley Pennit
Center within 180 days of the date of issuance'of the pennit. Any fee refund requcsl rc^ceiWed after 180
days of the clate of permit issuance shall be clenied. My refund approved shall be limited to $0°/p of the
total Pernlit Fee paid. ltefunds shall be limited to 13uildine, Plumbing and Mechanical Permit fees paid to
the City of Spokane Valley.
f
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 ' Page 11 of 18
Schedule C - F1RE CODE
FIRE ALA12M, SPRIlNKL.ER ANTD OTHER PROTECTION SYSTEMS
Ciey proccssing fee of $35 is added tn these Fire District 1 fccs.
Plans check zind review fces, inspections, and permit for installation df sep3rate fre alarm system or
sprinkler system applications, and other fire protection systems.
Fire Alarm Systein
New installation
1-4 devir•eS S150 -
5-100 devices $250
Additional lOQ devices $ 50
Fach aciciitional pancl $ 40
Sprinkler supervision only $ 75
Each additional floor $ 40
Fire Sprinkler Systems
1-9 heads $ 53
10-49 S 165
50-I00 S275
1 Ol -204 $325 .
201-3Q0 $350
301-400 $375 401-500 $425
500+ $500-+ $33 per heacl
For hydraulically designed systems multiply the above fee by 2 •
New Suppression Systems ,
Range hoods, halqn, C02; dry chemical, FVI 200, intergen spray boaths; etc.-
Unit 1-5 nozzlcs $100
Qver S nozzlcs $1 00 +$10 per noccle
Bottle(s) $3Q per bottle
Fi,re Pump Installation
Plan revie-w & inspeclion fee $500
Underground Fire Mains - Plan rc;view and inspect. $150
Standpipes uot a part of automatic suppression s,ystcm
Ylan review and inspcction $150
Resolution 07-017 Fee Rcsolutiott for 2008 Page 12 of 18
; i
Other Protection Systems . Fire extinguishing systcm (other than sprinkler.s) - $ 50
plus $1.50 per nozzle
Standpipe installation
ClasS I and Class Il $ 58
Class III $ 70
Tanl: installation - per taiik
Flammable and combustible liquicls storagc
tasiks installation $ 60
Hazardous materials - storage tanks installation $ 60
Liquefied petroleum $ 60
Gaseous oxygen systems S 60
'Nlicrous systcros $ 60 .
Medical gas systems $ 60
IIazardous material recycling systeins $ 60
Vapor recovery systcm $ GO
Cryogeilic $ 60
12emoval, abanclonmcnt or any combulation
thereof of ilammable or combustible liquid storage tanks $ 90
Emcrgency or standby commercial power
~ gencrator install $ 60
PER.MTTS Cnnditional Use Permit $ 60
Tcmporary Use Permit $ 60
Tents/cxnory Permit (event) `I"o be determined
PLANS CIIECK ANIa REVIEW BY Tr1L+" 13U121:t1U OF FTRE PREVFNTIQN
New commercial plans check and inspection (for prnjeets not mentioned elsewhere) S 60
LAND USL+"
Subdivision/FUll
Freliminary $120
Final $ 60
Short Plat
Preliininary $120
Fina1 $ 60
~ -
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 13 of 18
Schedule A - PAI2KS & RECItEATI4N '
;
ADiMUqsTRATivE rLEs
Basic fees to be eonsidered when applying rates
,ldmiriistrative Fee $30.00
Refuse Fee $50.00
AQiJATICS
Poal admission (age 5 and under) free
Pool admission (age older than 5) $1.00
Pool punch pass (25 s-tvims) S20.00
Weekend tamily cliscount ' 1 child uodcr 13 frec
with paying adult
Reservation (less tlian 50 people) $100.00 Per houriQ
Foocl fee (if applicable) . 525.00
IZcservation (50 -100 pcople) $125.00 Per liour*
Food fee (if applicable) 550.00
Re.ce.rvatic►n (101 -15A people) $150.00 Per hour*
Food fee (if applicflble) S75.00
*Mirtimum 2 ltours
ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PFRVTiT . Alcoholic Bevcragc Pcrmit Fcc 510.00
CLNTL+"17YLACE
Confcrcncc Ccntcr Wing
Audi/orium S75.00 F'cr hour
Auditorium $450.00 Per day
Auditoriuin $225.00 Per hnlf day
Auclitorium w/Presentation System S50.00 Per hour *
Auclitorium w/Presentation S,ystem $300.00 Per dAy *
Auditorium w/Presentatiori System $150.00 Pcr half day *
Auditorium T)eposil $50.00
E; xecutivc Confcrence Room $50.00 Per hour
Execulive Conference Room Depusit $50.00
RZeeting Room (Day 8c Evening Use) $40.00 Per tiour
Meeting Room $250.00 Per day
Meeting Room $125.00 Per half day
M..eeting Room Aeposit $50.00
* Requires renlal of presentation system on page 16
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 14 of 18
Great Rvom
Kitchen w/Dining Room Rental S100.00 Per use
Kitchen - Commcrciu) Use (2 hour min.) $50.00 Per hoar
Kitchen Deposit 550.00
vlulti-Usell3anquetHall $100.00 Perhour
viulti-Usc/Banquet Aall $$UO.UU 9 hr Session
Multi-Usc/Banquet Aall S1,500.00 All day (6am-l.am)
Smalt Dining Area $50.00 Per hour
Dcposit $200.00
Stage $20.00 Per section per day
Table Settings (linens & tableware) $2.00 Pcr pl:~ce setting
Scnior Center V1'ing
L.ounge with llaoce Flc►or 5100.00 Per 6our
Lounge with Dance Fluur $800.00 Per day
. Loungc Deposit $200.00
Meeting Room (Evening Use) S40A0 Per hour
Mecting Room (Fvening Use) -$125.00 4 hr session
Meeting Room (Weekend IJse) $250.00 Per day
Meeting Roam (NVicekend Use) $125.00 Per half day
.
Meeting Room Deposit $50.00
I'riviite Dining Roam $50.00 Per hour
Private Dining Room Peposit $50.00
VVellness Ce.nter $100.011 Per liour
~
Miscellancous
Clesinup fee $50-300 Per event
FIosdHostess (ufler hours) $15.00 Per hour
Yresentation System (inclucles projector/podium/ $250.00 Per day
DVDNCI7/sound systemlcamcrx system)
Room Setup $25.00 Per hour
Satcllitc Video Conferencing $250.00 Per hour
Sound System $40.00 Fer day
'rechnical Suppart $40.00 Per liour
Television/VCR S75.00 Per day
Touch Pad Voting System $115.00 Bsse station per
+$15.00 day
Per keypad pcr day
EVENTS - includes Pi►vilion
Evenls include but are not limitcd to activities such as car shows, tournaments and aetivities involving
. 200 or mnre people. The Directnr of Parks and Ftecreation will make thc final deterniination.
General Fee S150.00
Non-profit apPlicatioas $80.00 Or free wilh
sponsorship* *Applications for joint sponsorship wilh the City of Spokatre Yalley ►vill be consitlered by the S1lokane
Yulley Purks Uepartment. .
~
i ,
,
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 15 of 18
FiELD ItENTAL -
Use Fee $25.00 First hour rlus $15 '
cach Additional hour TNDOOK iJSF
Open gyni admission $2.00 Playground program admission (10 entries) $20.00
1VI1lZAREAU
Mirabcau Springs
Small sUcltcr und waterfall $].SO.AO Maximum 4 hours
Refundablc deposit (less than 200 people) S50.00
Mirabefiu vleadows
S1ieltcr (less than 200 peoplc) $80.00
Shelter (200 or morc people) $150.00
Refundablc depusit (less tlian 200 people) 550.00
Refunduble cleposit (200 nr more people) $250.00
PiCNIC SHEI,TERS
Picnic Snelter (less than 200 people) $30.00 Ficnic Shelter (200 or more people) $150.00
Refundable deposit (less than 200 pcoplc) $50.00
Refundable deposit (200 or more people) S250.00
PROFESSIONAL PiiQTOGRAPIII'
Permit Fce $25.00 Annual
FtECREATION
Recreation program fees are set to recover costs as specificd in the Parks and Recreation revenue
policy.
VALLFY A'LCSSI0N ARENA neotal* $100.00 Per weekend
Refundable deposit $SO.OA
*Renter responsible.for vrr-site preparation. Rentrrl requires liability insurance.
i
R.esolution 07-017 Fee Ltesolution for 2008 Pagc 16 of 18
Schedule E - ADMINISTRATIVE ~
COPY FEES .
Copy uf audio tapes, video tapes, pliotos, maps or nt6er At cost
records needing reproduction
Copy of written records $0.15 Pcr page
Copy - Large format $3.00 Per page
Copy of full documents At cost
QTHER ADML\''iSTRA7'IVE FEES
NSF Check $25.00
` ;Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolution for 2008 Page 17 of 18
Schedule F - OTfR=ER FEES
AUULT F,NTEq RTAIl\`1VENT F'EES
Establishmcnt Licenses
Live Adult Entertainment $1,500.00
Adult Arcade $1,500.00
Other Adult EntertAinment Licenses
Adult Arcade Device License $150.00
Mansger Licease $150.00
Entcrtxiner T..icensc $150.00
Late License Fee - Charged in additioii to license fee. '
Percent uf
Past Due Calendar Da,ys License Fce
7 - 30 25%
3l_ - 60 SO%
61 and ovcr 75%
13O5iNESS REGrSTRA710N FEES
Business registration $13 each year
Nonprofit registralion $ 3 each year ,
SFCURiTY FAL,SE ALARM FEES
Repeated malfunctioning securin, false ala.rms in a given six-month period.
First aIarm \To c6arge
Secnnd alarm $30.00
TFiird alarm $70.00
Fourth ancl subsequcnt Alarms $120.00
STQRM WATEK IJTTL.ITY CIiARGE ON nFVFLQFEll PA1tCEL,S Lach single-facnily unit each year $21
All other properties each $21 Fer 3,160 sqnare feet
of impervious surfacc
TOW OF'LTtATOR ANNUAL REGI:STRATION I~,EE $100.00
OVEMI°GEU LOAD PERMIT FEE $25.00
.
Resolution 07-017 Fee Resolutinn for 2008 Page 18 of 18
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sign-aff:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ informa6on 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2009 CDBG Program - Potential CDBG Projects
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: Spokane County has estimated for planning purposes only, that the County
will receive $1,500,000 in CDBG funding for the 2009 program year. There are statutory limits
on the administration and planning allocation of 20% of new funds or approximately $300,000.
Also limited by statute is the human service allocation at 15% of available funds or
approximately $225,000. In May of this year Spokane County agreed to amend the CDBG
funding policies to establish a 20% set-aside of the County's annual federal appropriation for
City of Spokane Valley capital projects. This results in an estimated set-aside for Spokane
Valley projects of $300,000.
City staff met to identify city capital projects that would qualify for CDBG funding. The following
list of projects is preliminary based on city staff's evaluation of CDBG eligible projects.
Preliminary cost estimates are cunently being developed and will be brought forward to the
Council at the October 14'" meeting.
1. Clement Sewer Project - Full width paving
2. Various street projects that include ADA improvements
3. Self Assessment Study of ADA compliance.
OPTIONS: Identify other potential projects for consideration.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide staff direction in preparing for the scheduled
public hearing on October 14, 2008
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Undetermined at this time.
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP - Planning Division Manager
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: None.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 23, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: p consent a Old business 0 New business ❑ Public Hearing
❑ Information ❑ Admin. Report ❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan Deliberations - Book
II: Applicability and Zone District Boundaries.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Subarea Plan must be consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Washington State Grouvth Management Act (GMA), RCW 36.70A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan process was initiated during the
summer of 2006. After a series of workshops and study sessions, the staff/consulting team
presented a Public Hearing Draft Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan for hearings
and review by the Planning Commission.
~ After public hearings and deliberations, the Planning Commission presented their
Recommended Subarea Plan to City Council for review, hearings and deliberations.
On July 29, 2008, City Council conducted a public hearing on the Subarea Plan. Council
accepted testimony on Book I: Community Intent and Boot II: Development Regulations. Due
to the lateness of the evening, Council closed the public hearing on Books 1 and II. A second
hearing was held on August 19, 2008 where Council received testimony on Book III: City
Actions. On August 26, 2008, Council discussed the deliberation schedule and asked
questions about issues raised during public testimony.
On September 2nd and September 9th, Council deliberated on Book 1: Community Intent.
Council will begin deliberating on Book II: Development Regula4ions.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Subarea Plan will continue with deliberations as
scheduled.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Attachment: 1. Memo: Sprague and Appleway Cost Estimates
J~ 2. Planning Commission Recommended Sprague/Appleuvay Zone District Map
Somme
Valley
11707 E Sprague Ave Sulte 106 ♦ Spokane VaUey WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.10081 dtyhall6spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Ciry Council; Dave Mercier, City Manager; Mike Jaclcson, Deputy City Manager
From: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
CC: Kathy McClung, Community Development Director
Date: September 16, 2008
Re: CQSt Estimates for Sprague and Appieway
The total projected cost to convert Sprague Avenue and Appieway Boulevard (nto a two way
system between I-90 and Sullivan Road, as recommended in Book III of the Sprague and
Appieway Conridars Subarea Plan, is about $42 miilion. The following tabie breaks this all-
inclusive estimate into major categories.
Two-way Appieway Lane Sidewalks, curbs Tob!
1 Conversion Extension . Narrowing landacaplng (streetacape)
3 ra ue $1.5 million j - - - -
$500K $9.8 million' $11.4 million
Ap lewa $1.4 million $24 million $4.9 million $30.3 million
, Totat $2.9 million $24 million $500K $14.7 million $42.1 m(Ilion
• Includes $800K for City Center curb enhancements.
The tebles attached to this memo provide a detailed breakdown of the cost estimates per
the recommended fmplementation stages as presented by Troy Russ of Glatting Jackson at
the February 19, 2008, Joint City Councll/Pfanning Commission study session. A graphfc
depiction is presented for each stage, followed by a table showing proJected costs.
Please direct quesbons to either Scott Kuhta (688-0049) or Steve Worley (688-0191).
STAGE 1: TWO-WAY CONVERSION OF SPRAGUE AND APPLEWAY -
DISHMAN-MICA/ARGONNE TO UNIVERSITY
W _ ~ ~ ~
$ 1 l l~' I~ I 1
I-~ k 1 1 1
I 1 1 I 1 1
. ~ _ . . .
TVYO-WAY IN7'ERSECTION CURB3, SIDEWALKS,
8TAGE 1 CONVERSION ENHANCEMENT LANDSCAPING AND TOTAL
MULTI-USE PATH'
Sprague $611,400 $600,000 $1,757,016 $2,968,416
Appleway $653,687 0 $1,688,568 $2,342,255
Total $1,265,087 $600,000 $3,445,584 $5,310,671
'Includes multi-use path along the Appleway
STAGE 2: EXTEND APPLEWAY FROM UNIVERSITY TO EVERGREEN -
REDUCE SPRAGUE FROM 7 TO 5 LANES
z
~ Iz~ ~1 ~ t m I ~I
1 I
. , _ . _ .
3TAGE 2 EXTEND LANE NARROWING CURBS, SIDEWALK3, TOTAL
APPLEWAY' ANO RESTRIPING ANO LANDSCAPING
Sprague 0 $369,360 $3,217,708 $3,587,088
Appleway $12,155,937' 0 $633,800 $12,789,537
Total $12,155,937 $389,360 $3,851,348 $16,376,605
• Indudes multi-use patfi along Appleway
STAGE 3: TWO-WAY CONVERSION OF AUTO ROW
z 1 1 ~ 1 I
t
3
a 1¢ ~ ~ t•- f~ ~
~ Iz s.'~ k ! I I
1
I ~ 1 1 I 1
. ~ _ . . .
STAGE 3 TWO-WAY CONVER810N CUR88, 81DEWALK3 AND TOTAL
LAND8CAPIN(3
Sprague $858,874 $2,512,032 $3,370,906
Appleway $760,247 $2,600,795 $3,361,042
Total $1,619,121 $5,112, 827 $6, 731, 948
•Does not include praposed I•90 Ramp Extension.
STAGE 4: COMPLETE THE SYSTEM - EXTENO APPLEWAY FROAII EVERGREEN TO
TSCHIRLEY, CONVERT SPRAGUE FROM 7 TO 6 LANE3 BETWEEN SULLIVAN
AND EVERGREEN
I ~ I 1 I I I
~
~t-
I
, ~ _ . . .
STA(3E 4 EXTEND LANE NARROWING CURB3, SIDEWALKS, TOTAL
APPLEWAY• AND RESTRIPINO AND LANDSCAPING
Sprague 0 $184,320 $1,699,204 $1,883,524
Appleway $11,651,471' 0 0 $11,651,471
Total $11,651,471 $184,320 $1,699,204 $13,534,995
'Appleway is extended to Tshfriey and Includes Muft1-Use Path
~~anning Commission Recommended
~ N**Fcbwft=
SpraguelAppleway Distrrct Zones Map
M I ~ 1
~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
' ~ ~ ~ I R•, y , ' ~ _ e
~ RSS
RS
l a x 4 ~ ' v ~ , ~ . ~ _ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~..I~~~
It
~
C1ty l~~ ~~okaI~~ Vafley
?"ryF hl W'..1 - w - rw W.. R_- - 1_'
Offi~ial Zoning Map R' "Fi-4C3 ~rLc~t -F
17 ,
_
~.s'
R
, . .
~ i
. ~ - . .
~m
~
,
~
,
i I ~ - r
f . ,
.
, ~ , • ,1 ~ F1
,
I
_
- - - - ~
llil (J~~
;00wky.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
August 2008
AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION
• Street Malntenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal
• Street Sweeping - AAA winter/spring sweeping. Spring Sweeping is compiete
• Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair cantract -Poe Asphait Paving Inc. worked on Street
Preservatian Projects and Pavement Removal and Replacement
• Landscaping Serv(ces - Spokane ProCare is working springlsummer 2008. Discussed muftlple areas
that have swales that may be required by Home Owners Associatfons to maintain.
• Vactoring Contrad - AAA Sweeping removed ponding water around dryweHs Contract Monies are
nearly expended, working on Change Order.
• Engineering Services Support - AgreemerYts with private engineering firms.
• Street Maintenance (Pines 8 Trent) - WSDOT Irrterlocal
• Solid Wasie - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal - Public Works was on the selection committee for the
Performance and Flnandal Audit for the Spokane Reglonal Sotld Waste System, Recommendations
are schedu{ed to be sent to the Liaison Board on September 15, 2008 for their consideration.
'ASTEWATER
• CH2MHill was selected for the design, build and operation of the Spokane County Regional Water
Reclamation Facility, The County is cunently in negotlations with that firm.
• Ecology relssued the TMDL for another 30 day comment period that ended on June 24"' Comments
are available at their web site at:
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programslwqftmdtlspokaneriveNdissolved_oxygen/PublicComm2.html
CAPITAL PROJECTS
• City Hall Project
The City Hall Program was preserited and approved by Cauncil on June 24v'. We issued a contract to
Benardo Will & GGLO for site planning. We are cumently scheduled to present the flrst concepts to
Councll on September 16.
• Valley Corridor Project
Project on hold pending autcome of the SpraguelAppleway Corridor Sub Area Plan.
• Street Master Plan
JUB Engineers is working on the update to the Street Master Plan.
• Broadway Ave Reconstructlon - Moore to Flora (0088)
Holding Neighborhood Mtg with Skilling's Connolly, Inc. on Thursday evening, Sept 11th Benthin
Associates is surveying for topographic map and property boundary.
• Appleway/3prague/Dishman Mica ITS (0462)
WSDOT advertised the project for bid starting August 26 and will provide consEruction management
services for this project. Conduit was placed acrass Dishman-Mica at 8th and 16th Aves as part of the
Dishman-Mica repaving in July. There will be a camera placed at Paric/Appleway, Dishman-
Mica/Appleway and University/Appleway intersections. A dynamic message sign will be placed on
Sprague Ave just east of I-94
• Children's Universal Park (0086)
Stakeholder meetings were held on August 14th. The first meeting was for Educators and the second
was for Health Care Provlders and Special Needs. Consultant will develop park concepts at two
locations within Mirabeau Point Park in preparation for a public open house and presentation to Council
in the near future
CONSTRUCTION
• PineslMansfield (0005)
Construction started July 23. Utility relocations continuing to occur. Contractor has rough-graded
Mansfield and the roundabout area and has begun work on the concrete lntersection at Pines and
Mansfield.
• Appleway Avenue Reconstrucdon - Tschirley to Hodges (0016)
Knife River was awarded the project as the low bldder for $4,565,859.95. Construction began March
17th. Paving complete. The southem swales have been graded and sod has been placed.
Sidewalks and driveways on the North side of Appleway have begun. The signal at the Barfcer
intersection Is camplete. Striping has begun.
• Barker Road Bridge ProJect (0003)
Bridge was closed starting July 7. Contractor has been acquiring materials and has mobllized
equipment to the project site. Contrector has removed barrier from the bridge. Work in the river will
start upon receipt and approval of a demolition plan.
• 24"' Avenue Reconstruction Pro)ect (0053)
Project construction is complete.
• Broadway / Fancher PCC Interssctlon (0067)
Project design is complete. Looking for addltional funding. Construction delayed to 2009.
• Sprague ! Bowdish, PCC Interaection (0092)
Bids opened August 22: contract awarded on August 26 to Acme Concrete Paving Inc. Project
scheduled to start construction on Monday. September 15 and be complete by November 1, 2008.
• Broadway Ave Reheb - I-90 EB Ramps to Park Rd (0068)
Bids opened August 22; contract awarded August 26 to Red Diamond Construction. Project scheduled
to start construction on Monday, September 15 and be complete by November 1, 2008.
• Signal Controller Upgrade ProJect (0071)
All controllers were delivered in August Spokane County and WSDOT signal mainEenance crews will
test, program, and install new controllers under existing engineering ssrvices contracts.
• Spragus/Conklin Slgnal (0077)
Recefved estimate from Knife River (contractor for the Appleway Avenue Reconstruciion Project) The
change order has been signed by Knife River.
• Broadway Ave Safety Improvement - Park Rd to Pines Rd (0063)
StaN recommends not moving ahead with project until more accident data can be evaluated. Councif
directed staff to wait for more accident data.
• Swimming Pool Upgrade Project (0073, 0074, 0075)
Work on all three bath houses is complete. Park Road- The contrador has finished ihe structural for
the mechanical room and the roof extension. Natural Stn.iaures erecting the slide, schedu{ed complete
by 20 Aug. The slabs surrounding the slide are placed, cantractor scheduled to saw cut and replaoe
some cracked and paor slab sectians. Contrador installing mechanical equipment, pumps available
around the first part of September. Meeting and Inspection punch list at Paric with ORB and Contractor
scheduled 28 Aug. Kllgore started construction work at Terrace View 11 Aug.
• Old Senior Center Oemolition (0072)
Old Senior Center Demolition - Woriced on the development of a bid package for asbestos remavai and
demolition of existing building Estimate is $130,000 Design complete, awaiting word for funding the
project
• Valley Mission Park Upgrade (0076)
Worked with Parks Dept. on the development of a schedule and plans for work to be accompiished this
ysar
• Sullivan Bridge #4601 Inspectlon over Trent(0095)
Inspection scheduled 13 Aug.
• 44'" Avenue Pathway- Woodruff Rd. to Sands Rd. (0854)
Spokane County will fumish additianal survey data to COSV in October.
• Police Precinct-Shop Drain InstallaNon (0086)
Consultant contract awarded DEA, 1°t Phase-consultant currently investigating options for the projeci,
wifl prepare and submit the recommendation around the middle of Aug.
• Spaldings Sanitary Sewer Project (0066)
The projeets design is complete This project will bid with the White Birch Project Construction wifl
begin in September
• Trentwood 3anitary Sewer Project (0068)
The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Conslruction began on July 9, 2007. The project is 100%
complete.
• Grandview Acres Sanitary Sewer ProJect (0067)
The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began June 5, 2007 ThE project is 100%
complete.
• Rockwe11/Summerfield Sanitary Sewer Project Phase I(0091)
This project bid with SummerFreld. The project was awarded to Knife River. Construction began in May
2008. 80% of the mainline is complete
• Rockwell Santtary Sewer Pro]ect (0094)
The project was awarded to SI Construction. Sewer main placement will began the week of July 14'".
6096 of the malnline is complete.
• Summerfield Sanitary Sewer Project (0084)
This project bid with Rockwell/Summerfield. Knife River was awarded the contract. 90% of the sewer
main has been placed.
• Sutters Sanitary Sewer ProJect (0082)
The project was awarded to SI Construction. Construction began an May W". 100°k of the sewer main
has been placed.
• White Birch Sanitary Sewer Project (0081)
Owens Construdion was awarded the project. 80% of the sewer main has been pfaced.
• Evergreen Sprague PCCP Interaectlon Project (0102)
Requested Boundary and Topo Survey Propasai from USKH Sept 5, 2008
• Pines Sprague PCCP Intersection Project (0103)
Requested Boundary and Topo Survey Proposal from USKH Sept 5, 2008
• McDonaid Sprague PCCP Interaectlon Project (0104)
Requested Boundary and Topo Survey Proposal from USKH Sept 5, 2008
TRAFFIC
• Spokane County has cumpleted LED installations at 17 intersections far the year. Rebate re
have been submitted to Vera and Avlsta.
• Assisteri Capital Projects with design and construction issues on Appleway, Broadway/Pa-
Sprague/Bowdish cancrete iniersection, CMAQ grants, Pines-Manssfield, and sewer projE- ~
• 30 New citizen requests/complaints were received via phone and email_ These typically invc
traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concems, streetlight outages,
requests for new streetlights, traffiic count requests, and paricing issues.
• Completed 169 traffic counts this summer (in house staff and contractor)
• Developing striping pla
Sprague east of Sulliv=
STORMWATER
• Have done extensive research and continued planning for implementation of the NPDES Phase 11
and UIC requfrements Coardinating with Spokane County and the City of Spokane to develop a
Public Outreach Pragram.
• Presently woricing on a uEastern Washington Stormwater Coalition Website" ie Ci,y City Counl`
Projected primarily for satisfying NPDES Phase li
• Here is our mascot -tattoos and stickers to follovv
~O -
~ . ~
MN
~ sro~uuv~ vALLEr
' CALL 1b I~EPORT
688-0321
• Presented the need for a regular vactoring schedule at council 8 shed light on the future needs
• HOA are protesting storrnwater fess on private roads. Decision to discontinue the fee for the
specific HOA private road parcels.
• Working in Coordination with City of Spokane, Spokane County, APC , DEQ, and Department of
Ecology on a Stormwater atlas.
• Discussed Decant Facility options.
• Finding a consuliant to assess and propose a solution for 4 residences that have flooded repeatedly
• Went to print on a guide to maintaining bmp for draining swimming pools, Jacuais, and outdoor
water features, will be distributing In the near future.
• Currentty putting together a guide for best management practices for landscapers, ie. fertilizers
runoff management
STREET 8 STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY
The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City oi Spokane Valley for
August, 2008;
~ AAA Sweeping, Inc. swept arterials at night, 40 hours.
• Poe had sub-c:ontraciors grind off centerline paint on Montgomery
• County painted Montgomery.
.
• Poe completed paver patches on Evergreen, south of 240
• Geiger worked through August doing vegetation control.
• Cets Eye Excavating did A/C dIg-outs for Poe Asptialt and adjustments on Montgomery project
• Tom and Brant inspected contractor woric, trimmed bnash and patched potholes.
STREET: Through the end of August private contrac4s invoiced S1,051,534 and the County invoiced
$1,412,358 far a total Street Maintenance cost of $2,483,892.
STORMWATER: The County invoiced $5,033 and private contracts involced $593,582, for a total
Stormwater Maintenance cost of $598,615.
STREET AND 3TORMWATER MAINTENANCE COMPARISONS THROUGH AUGUST
oomrw.er M. n.oc.
Spolcane unty
2Qti8 SS 33
•
4
2007 t5,649
I
Siortrr+► Malntena
PrNat Contncton
3
ZflQ1 .48Z I
I S ( t Mslafu+ar►C
( kar» Counry
2
2007 1,937
8bset Yahttat •
rIvab Contra rs
~
toor s130.438
5- 520C,oQ!' ~~.'10 000 5800,UCO b8001.000 S1,000,000 51.200.CaID 51,aDD,000 51,E00,C{Jo
"k,ane
,,;00x;W1ey.
~ PrWnaod Uetslgn GN 2008 EStiFna ~ ttwd Ca~bucllon Prokata Fundfn0 I Mansper ~ Btd Dafn I C~i9~ i Concwmftw s ~I Gae tlon ~0~ Compkb FknAinp T~ t
am3 Batkar koed BrYdpe Rcwluoemdri • 6erker Ftti sl Sppkanp Rlver 8R Knutapn FeD08 t 0011 2% 17J1109 OQ% pK f 888,101 S 11.317,OD:;
0005 P6vflManslfatd P►olect - Wifwr to Plnea, b 1-90 T1BICAIAQ Kn~ /►pr.qg 100X Tli 1011JQ0 9596 0% f 1.032,045 f 5,308.143
001e ADpieway ArerKie Reaanitrudlon - TschIr4ey to Hodpee STP(En Art! Ssw 100`R 9611 1N1N0 100% 0% f 684,OUD S 6,009,SBA
aofJ 24M Avenus Reoonstruaiion -$u6van b Veracresf 8 22nd CIN IUdworth Avr-06 100'fb 100'N S21/0G 36'K 0% 3 900,000 1 990,6oa
ooa2 SpropuelAppleweylDntvnsn RS • SP►aCue(AppleweyeDfshrtrn CMAO Krwtson t01?x 0'ft 41100 0% ux f 530,700
ooa7 Bra+dweylFur.Aer PCC InlereecdYm -&urOwry srx! fsrdier srPcut Aiowom+ uey-ae loox ox miroe 20x ox t 581.000 s i 2es,000
oaae e►o.owev~n ~cu,dr~ov~ F-o0 b Ps►k Rd tCr~ C~ nioworen 1ooqc ax 1 orzaoe ax ax s 3sI,00o
r~r, ~ C kW wole Wovc Zox 1 Inroa o% a►c t 25e,4a0
nUT So►epuelIconkunsqnri - sao" .odCotiam osraoopers Arn rvn 100x u% ,atma taox ax s - 2 300,000
D05+2 5pnnueeowdhh PCC MWeedion • Sprapue.nd Bew3aA 3TA AlQworth Mav-os taO% Mi 14/20I08 0% oyc t 182,900 1 822.000
Parb Pta"
n077 Old Setwx CenLar Dernolltbn - Mlqion rfd 8oweimft Ptrks V1hlY 10094 0% 9f1lOS f 50,000
0013 Park Rd Swimmlt~p Nad UD9ade - Perfc Rd Parke VYest 41er-08 100x 85% a7~a709 10D~L 0'ri
no7~ Tarroes ~tew ~nxnMq Pool Uppnde •?I!h end Tenao~ V~ew Parks NMst Mur-08 t00% 2J'I~ 619108 100% i 3,372,775
s7oT5 VeUey Mlesion SvAmminp Pool Upprade - 46sion 11ve P~rfu VVe~t Mer-08 10M~ 23l~ d6109 tUOaK 0'!~
rr76 Voltsy Mlsslm PArk UAprsde -Wmwm Ave. Perka VYeet Jun-08 0% 07h 81t Sr09 t ?±Z 000
noers Cnildren'e LJnivenmW Park - U6rnbew Partcwsv Pa+fnlS4b Wor4ry OoaOS 0!K O% BrirtY:~ r~:. oS~, L t.oOG.nOC:
Cmuennld TroU Neshoom INeler Sory{oe purfu yyprfey ~A
Stroa1 PmenMlm+ Pr*eeh
([W Qishrnen Nllce Rehab - ApdowaY Avu b 18p1 Ave Gft qein Na ox eli roe i 739.068
00m MoMOOmmy Ava ReAeb - Nponne Rd to UrirervAy Rd Ci1y qeln nfs G% M11Z18 S 242.00t1
Rwcl DesNan Preieds
lxM 411h Avenue PsIMwo1' - WnoclMf to Sende (F'E~ STPM AIWwxtl~ 0% 0'K 011/06 f 955,000
oo5e BroocMnry Ave RaheD - Fsrrlrt b Thlermon (PE) STW11) AMweM 0% 0'M 9Hf09 t 900.000
aoee Broedwey Ave. - Moar Ia F1on (PE. R1M TH3 Aldwor9h S% 0% i Wtm 3 2 toR.90n
EverproenlSpropue PC:CP irAarsection Pm)ocf &TA AWw.xlh Mar-as 11/ 101110tMcGoneldf5praptis FCCP InlenecLOn F'rojed .riTA AldwArth MerfiB 1% t O11 A'r?3
P1neN5Drn"PCCPkuaieelionPinler.+ S;A P-Jak-,h0n nna-00 Ir. tQ~~nno
8omr Pteigcta
txriA SMQk+Os -PnveDaclc - lndiene west o( MrmtUmmo-y r:it, Mt! Msv <i; i W'e 0", t t~ Irqn 41pYu, Ws S I 1f,()43
171057 GnftwAnew Anee - P*valiet'Ji - 8u4Eer 1n Cemem. Fairview bEnpve Crty Mt /1pr-47 1 QD°N. ! 0(Na 711J08 f 00'X GOX f - 3 7,778
WSa Tnerdwood - PaveOock - Vercla b Evemreen. Trenf b YWiNdby CNy !up Apr47 10QK 100% 7/1lOS 100'ri 75'K f - f 8.000
no9t RorJcwellrSumrtses4eW PAeso I- Parnbeck • Hoctcwed, Everpreen to Su*van Gy NII Aat.00 100% EO% 1 1/1/06 00% 0% i - f 53.327
0094 Raclcwe/ - Pewb4rli • AvMan b Adomi. Trent lo Webeah CMy Artt 1Aey-08 tA0% 00% 11/1JOE 70% 0% t f 321.500
mM SummerM1eld - Pavebedi - Adams to SulOvan. Tront b ONrnDic Cb Mt qpr-08 100'K 909i 11/tA8 30% 01i f f 158.885
roH2 Sut6an - PareOadc - Evwpnen M Prtfpresa, lsth lo ep1 Cify Ar11 Apr-00 t DfYlL 95K 9►1 S" 30% 0% S - i 157,5 1 ~
Mnl WhMe 9irGh • Pavebadi • S+llfren b Flara, Ath bo 9rtaCrwV CHY Arll I►Dr-0E 100% eE1% 17/1A8 301G 0% f - f 157,205
OIlfw P►cieCb
rxnv VeMy Carrkfrx CrnkotWrwAd &tudy - UrY~enlty fn 1ehlAqr S7P(U) VYnrfey N+1 Jis►07 0% p% : $ 293.00n
onn v.+kIy Cmao. - a►qecc 2- u„tvennr m Eve,y.se„ ' Stv(U) yyuley 01i p% s e.zoo.ooc
0096 SuIIMK+ Ra &ictpe wer Tnrrt Irnpectlon Gf71 NM1 10%
t /5 OD7
nos9 Cttv Hd PropremrrwqlSUa Plwwmp C9N Kenftn
sb,,,w.b. owAM F.uft roWo% ch wea
SA+ret MWrNe~noe slon" FodUy Cdv Kereten
OOOS Velley Ptndnd Etlqy rk)pr p.Aln Psrks Wesl 14%
oo9e -§kmq nDA b+mrwemenb CDSr n~eworte~ ,q;
Au0 2004kiajU~a14 1'ro~ems Toir~ s a2.86i,iin
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
LO1V0 RANOE PLANNING:
Plsnning Commisalon
The Spokane Valley Plenning Commis6ion did not meet duhng tha month o1 August
Sprague/Appleway Revitallzstlon Plan
The SpregudApplewey ReviteMatian Plan process wntinued with a City Councll pub►ic heanng
on August 18, end e Council study seselon on Auguat 28. Scott Kuhta and Kathy McClung
attended e Spolcane Home BuilderB meeting on August 14, to discuss the propased development
regutatlona.
City CeMer Project
City Hall property negotietbns continued during the month of August with e aeaaion in Searile on
August 27.
CTED Regional Collaborstlon Grant Project
The Grant Commfttee is continuing to work on the collaborativa planning projed funded by the
2007 CTED grant. The Grant Committee waa successful in obtafning an 'Emeryin8 Issues GranY
from CTEO that will provide a cntlcal Iink to continue the existinB worlc cuttined In the
CallaborsUon Grant awarded in 2007.
On October 1, a Luncheon wlll be hald at CenterPlace to get thoughts end suggestiona on
varioua aapects of the CollabaraYrve Planning Gran1 Thero will be a presentation an the
propased devabpment regulatlona and process for the Metro Urben t3rourth Area In additlon, ea
a follow-up to the May 28, presentation, lhere will be an update an the revenue and service
delivery issues for the Metro Urban Grrnvth Areas
Orowth Managemerrt StesNng Commlttee of Elected OHlclals
Ouring August, the Planning Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC) prepared a repon faf the
Stesring Cammittee In reaponse to Spokane County's CPA-08-06, en Urban Growth Area (UGA)
Amendment, with concurrent zone reclessification. The Steenng Committea of Elected Officials
(SCEO) wiil meet an September 17, to review Spokene County's 2008 Annual Comprehensive
Plan Amendments,
2008 Comprehenslve Plan AmendmentslUpdates
The Ciry ot Spokane Vaffey is now acceptlnp appiicatiorts for the 2009 Comprehensive Pfan
Amendmerri cycle. The Spokane Va14ey Comprehenalve Plan Includes an ennual amendment
cycle that runs from Navember 2 to November i, of the following year, Tha Plann}ng
CommEssian oonsiders appHceUons reoetved prior to November 1, in late wlntaNearly sprfng of the
tollawtng year, with a decision by C)ty Councll In late spnng/early summer
Page 1 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
CURRENT PLANNING:
Revenue for the Plenning Div+sion for the montn of August was $26,120.00.
2008 Pianrting Revenues
tsaooo
s+o.ooo - -
.n.00C
moor - - _ . •
-
:Iaooo ~
so
.ior, Feb mm Avrd M.y .Wr+e .h* Aw sto 00 Nov O~c
p ~P- enun 2DOQ L RdwvwA20G7 -a,- RwvaM 2OQQ I
During the month ot August, Ptanning Division siaff held 8 cammercial pre-appiicatlon meetings
and reviewed 4 commerdal building permits, Planning Dfvislon staff approved forty-seven
commercial building permita, which includes a 8,500 gquare feet auto detail shop at 8710 East
Appleway Boulevard, Java Jump espresso stend relocated to 404 North Argonne Road, and a
15,000 aquare toot addition for Spokane Athtetic Club located at 5910 E 4°i Avenue. A SEPA
determination for e 44,000 sf officelwarehoase buitding et 7404 E Indiana was aiso issued. The
Division anawered 308 phone calls in the permft center, and helped 236 customers et the
counter
~ 2008 Permks Isaued
I 50
>
~
40 -
~ _'Q-b- - -
d I
J/11 /fp &W ApM' &by AY1 A$ A{1g S~ QC1 !1M o0
r 2001 ?S AO tN 1s 12 24 14 iT
~~0p7 '3T 13 1s 1t 1'0 ib ~ t! 1• t f ft
~--,tr-- 70G6 44 - ?S 36 !i 3'iI 23 !2 - 36 a! ~1 1 ~ ~ -
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
In tht month of Auguat. Planning Depertment stefl eccepted 3 boundary line asijustmenta, 1
protiminery short plat, end 3 Appeai Apptications for City Council to euthari¢a. The DepartmeM
atao compGeted 3 final short plats and 2 Admin(strative Exceptions. Staff conducted 5 land use
pre-application meetlngs and there were not arry public hearing conduded by the Hesring
Examiner in August
2008 Nsw Lsnd Uss Actbns
40 - { - - - - .:~.i- ~ ~ ~ - -s'.~ - - - - _ - -
30 _ - - • - - - - -
20 "
10- ~ I ~ - - -
0 J1n feb mYr Apr Mry Jun ~U AYp 6~p Od MDV CwC
p 700a 14 t! 10 ts it * 11 0
~ 70C7 14 27 17 18 +a • $4 19 t~ 12
~ppd ~Q 1f SC }I ?f 15 2S YQ 11 f !
BUILDING DIVISION:
The 8ulldfng Division issued 264 pertnits in August 2006, compared wth 368 for the same period
last year. New one and two dwelling unit sirudure permlts totaled 26 and new commerciel
structure permlts totaled 8 for the month of August.
_ 300e catSTRUCTIar PERMrrs
.a _
~o► _ _ I
I
` ~ r.~ ~ ry. M~ a.» +w s.~. oa rw aK
~ c~r~atr,ru u: otia 111 10 is j 111 .,i su
7011y P~1~ it.t ifl 7N ~1 ~!1 ~1 ~N ftl 22- tft 3tl
4 I
2008 Now BtructureWnits Parmitted
eo
~ 40
- -
in
I L
0 i J.~ fae 6ar Av ~Y Ju- Ab ~A+Y _ MW j Gn rrer O.e
o NMIs: d+oo wd s► ar Yt sr n I
■ war,* ua . i i o 0 0 • > >
o Niw ComnrW 8~n+cwn s 0 e 7 . » ~ • - - •
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2006, MONTHLY REPORT
In AugusR 2008, building inspeciora perionned 1,149 inapecttans in 21 deys wh4ch averages 54,7
inspections per day. Five hundred end three Right-of-Way inspecticns were performed for the
month. Pians Examiners roviewed 93 projects In ft month of August and 25 projecta were
awaiting review at the end of month, SteM etso Iasued 2 over-the-ccuMer pertnita for tfie month oi
August.
2005 BuNdMq Inspoctions
i _
i 100G I- .T - _ - -
af0 - - - - - - - -
~ Jn hY W 4r IY~ a~. - L~ ~+i rM ~i Or ~e.
I~ no.~n m ul ~a _ irr tm iri nii- t1M u Ui1t~ t M » u7
I
The reported value of constructian, including new structures and additlonsla{teratian is shown in
the follawinp chart, camparing these values with 2007. New value for August, 2008, totals
S13,701,587.00
2001 ValuaUon ot Construclion
aso.0on.ae0
t4s.AOO.ooa
uo,ooo.ooa
sa5:oc~.~oo ,
s~o nw.oao , ~ooe ~n+uw~ur+
535,0'OO.OOD - ? - - - E3 ~DQ7 V1~filpQrsl
t20,DD0,OD0 .
s t i,0U0.000 ~ I j 1, ~D09 VMJ~on
1
510,000.000 s6,000,000
so
~ .Nn Fib W Apr AAy Jw .IuIY AW8WOe! !bv Ooc ~
Buflding revenues for the mortth of August were $136:252.00
2008 8ulldin0 Ravanues
~eo~o,floo
~~oc.ooo - -
o2ooe nr.nu..
cx~a.ooo -
txiu~oC • - - Ci2001 Aewumu
I/W.~OC f 2M RMUr
~ _
i~ -
r. f-mb Urr A,► iin ae• a+r wo ow on uw t.c
Page 4 ot 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
CODE COMPLIANCE:
The numbar of'Violations Rsported' on the tollowtnp chart rnRects actual Spokane Vapey Zoning
Code violatiana, plus wmpleinta recelved which were not violetions. The complaints receivad are
added to the total becauae they reflect Ume officers apent ln the field coRducting invesiigatlons.
In addition, the 'Investigated' and 'Pending' columns accuretely roflect Code Compliance's
cument eblllty to procesa and irnestigate becklog cases.
The follawing chart provides a monthly comparison ai the types af Spokane Valley Code
violatlona teported. Viotet{ona are reported based on the pnmary complaint received, rather than
the numbef at edditional violatlcns idenpfied on arty individual premieea. The investiyetion of e
complaint ef junk vehldea, for example, mlght also resuit in Identlficetion o# edditlonal violations
such as the accumulstion o1 trash or harboring o( livestock. These are not included En the
aummery. A totel a1147 new oomplalnta were procesaed in Auguat
; - I
Code CompNance Flles 20W
200 _
15C- - - • - -
I
r I
D
- .
AtgSIlo- UCI- NOJ- ~C' .IBR Fru- F.h.,~- a~- ►,t~i'. Aft,- I nus.
07 ~ 07 Qt 01 ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ 08
in Yro~ PAparbd~ eo i m ee 36 21 2s »a 7e e2 e2 va ao 147
'
'„Ab,lleira* az I so N 24 se 1e P ao as 40 s? »148
k0 Re Trsralrs 2 1 0 2 7( 1 1 1 0, 1 4 Z Q
■ Faxlrp Fb . 66 aS 68 00 3e 13 ~ 00 68 66 64 57 63 51 .
I ■ _ - 1 ~ -
The Spokane Valley Police Departmertt, in conjundion with SCOPE, hea requested the
asaistence of Code Complience In Identifying Junk vehlclss abandoned withln the right-ot-way.
SCOPE volurtteers teg the vehicles, Vehicles which have not been moved by the follawing Fnday
are towed.
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
AcUvity is consolidated into the following six cetegones: Environmenta/ (seweNseptic, critical
areas, animal and nuisance violations); Property (Right ot Way, property use, dangerous buflding,
IandlordlLenent, illegal businesa and signaga vlolations); Junk Ayto - Solld Waste (solid waste,
illegat dumping, end household waste violetions): and Clearvlew Triangle end Complelnt
2008 Code VloFadons by Cabgory
I 160 - - - - -
140 -
120
100
- -
60 - - - -
60 - - - - - -
40
20
aian-oe r~aae t.r•a A-a ~an' autia I
~ p~r-o~ Mey nW•aa i s.o-cre ~ 004e "N-ce n.c.oe ;
■ so~a w~~. I3 14 IV ie 1 20 n to Io
~ 7 n 40 37 o ~ 4 26 ~
v ftoprtp ~ u J1 ~ u ~D 77 t7 -22
pArtt Auld ! 10 /Y aA f 15 • i
11
O~Girt1r1"e Fo Yk+Irb~ 3 a
i ^r~~ ~ : • c , i , , t
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER/NG:
The Deveiopment Engineers processed 25 files In Auguat. The sfgnificsnt files are B commerclal
applicaUcns, which fnclude a 44,004 si officNwarehouse for Intertnouritain Supply, a 5,300 sf !eb
tor Flsh & WildJife and a 4,333 sf ane-story community center fcr Mlssion Meedowa. Nfne
commerdal pre-application files wero reviewed Inciuding an 8,400 sf office bui{ding fcr Cemeron-
Rellly, a 6,912 ef addition to HYTOPZ with a losding dodc, a 10,338 sT fire stetion for Spokane
Valiey Firo Depertment *10, sbc lantf uae pre-epps, orte shart plst final applicaUan, snd 1
subdivision/rezone.
- '
omkopew+K 6ngrwft wok sY TYVo
~0'!l
~Q'!~
40'!G
Aup417 !o►-07 Od47 Ibr47 dc-OT J" hb-0i1 Mw-M AOr-011 ltqt-M Jun4l JYIM Au4-0
■ 81nd►np Site Ptan a Houndsty Lkte A4ustment O C1►m" c► Use
■ Commard01 ■ Canrnerclal PrMpps ■ CondlNlona! Uae Pertnlt
■ Finat 8crbONabn o twd Uw Pns•App ■ Retana
■ Short SuWnlalon O bueet Vacatlan
Page7of$
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AUGUST 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
CUSTOMER SERVICE:
Ptanning
The planning ataff assisted 238 walk-In customers et the counter end handled 308 customers'
;nquires by phone in the permft center.
Bullding Permits
The icllowing tebla aummerizes the performenca of the Pertnit Center for tliose permits erttered
in the PLUS syatem, measurod from the tlme that the appifcation f6 daemed "courtter-cflmplete"
to the time that a permit is issued
COMMERClAL T1MEFRAME 3UMMARY
Submitial to lssuance
Au
z °
T! ~ vak,e
~
~
NEW CONSTRUCTION
I A t 3 Sto or Less OTC 1 139,188 1 1 1
Educatonal - Publlc 1 17,725 11 11 11
IndusVlal Bulidi 2 284.018 337.5 247 428
Mercantite 1 494,656 47 47 47
ONir_niProfessianal 3 5.665,223 42.3 39 48
2 258,650 133 18 115
REMODEL
,aI Bu;id;n OTC 1 8250 1 1 1
Mer~ntile OTC 1 2,800 1 1 1
OfFce: Professianal 3 888.233 39.3 10 50
CHANGE Of USE
Mercan:!+e 1 3100 11 75 75 75
UPCOMiNG DATES OF INTEREST:
DATE INTERE8T
October 1 CTED Luncheon et CenterPlace
November 1 Deadiine to submit 2009 Comprehensiva Pisn Amendments
Page 8 of 8
SCITY~~
l~ol&ne
,
Wley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
4;000 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cttyhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager, Mike Jackson, Dep. City Manager
From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Date: September 9, 2008
Re: August Report
August highlights in Finance included:
August financial reports
Rcports showing a comparison of rcvenues and expenditures, to the 2008 Budget, are attached.
Gambling tax receipts for 2008 are expectied to be $150;000 to $200,000 less than budgeted. We have three
significant accounts ihat have fi3llen behind. We wiU continue to monitor these accounts but full collection is
unlikcly. Our budget projections for 2009 gambling taY receipts are $200,000 lcss Chan for 2008.
Expenscs for the year are ninning less than budgct -which offsets the lower gambling 1ax receipts.
i
The investment report is attaa}ied for your review.
Street fund revenue source
A telephone utility tax was passed by the council in Au€ust. Organizations providing telephone serviccs were
advised by letter of the January 1; 2009 effective date. This tax will be dedicated to the Street Fund.
2009 budget preparatiQn
Budget preparation usually starts in April of each year for the coming year. Staff is well down the path of
preparing the 2009 budget. One public hearing has been held ancl two more hearings are planned For September
and October. The council will be reviewing ordinances and resolutions as we proceed with the budget process.
2007 annual financial report and audit
Sta _ff is 70% lhrough the preparation of this report. Employees from the Statc Auditor's Office are on site and
conducting preliminary work.
Outside a"ncy Fundin$
Appl.ications for fimding were taken in late July. Ten social servicc agencies submitted requests and five
economic development proposals were received. As usual, the funding requests grcatly exceeded the dollars
available. The city council heard short presentations on these proposals in early August and awarded $156;000
to a total of eleven agencies.
Apnlications for toueismpromotion
Staffprovided notice That applications for tourism promotion programs would be available on September 8. The
deadline fbr submitting applications for tourism promotion grants is October 3. The lodging taat advisory
committee will review these applicaiions and send recnmmendations to ttie city council.
City of Spokane Valley
General Fund
Budget Variance Report
For the Period Ended August 31, 2008
Unaudited
Amencied Tentative Tentative
Budget Augus~ YTD Unrealized Peroenf
2008 Revenues venues Revenue Reafiz
General Fund Revenues:
Unreserved Fund Balance S 5,167,000 S - $ 9,000,000 $(3,633,OOU) 174.18°k 8
PropertyTax 10,496,500 52,161 5,394,182 5,102,318 51.39Q/o
Sales Tax 19,165,800 64 9,189,259 9,976,541 47.95%
Gambling Tax 720,000 206,592 421,348 238,652 58.52% 2
Franchise Fees/Business Ltoenses 853,450 233,749 506,149 347,301 59.31°r6 1
State Shared Revanues 5,320,550 8,088 711,681 608,869 53.89°fo 1
Planning & Building Fees 1,965,000 156,133 1,523,816 441,184 77.55°k
Fines and Forfeitures 1,300,000 145,166 1,032,512 267,488 79.42%
Recreation ProgrEm Fees 507,000 64,955 504,213 2,787 98.45%
Inveslmeni Inieresi 414,100 4,429 267,202 146,898 64.533'0
Operating Transfers 165,000 - 40,000 125,000 24.24% 3
Total General Fund Revenues: $ 42,074,400 $ 871,359 $ 28,590,362 S 13,4841,038 67.35%
Arnended Tentative Tentative
Budget August YTD Unrealized PercenE ,
200a Exaenditures €oenditures ~~endftures ealized
General Fund Expenditures:
Legislative Branch 319,991 13,433 983,470 136,521 57.34% 4
Executive 8 Legislative Support 997,076 68,310 560,864 416,212 58.26%
Public Safe#y 19,297,300 128,871 10,266,783 9,630,507 53,20%
Operations 8 Adminisirative Svcs 1,655,707 111.778 79$,446 857,261 4522%
Public Worfcs 956,437 42,176 489,363 467,074 51.17%
Planning & Community Dev. 3,713,139 221,340 2,05e,636 1,e48,503 55.68°k
Library Services 20,000 - 3,661 16,339 18.31% 7
Parks & Recrealion 2,644,420 173,110 1,435,822 1,208,598 54.30%
Gensral Government 3,417,988 134,226 1,178,522 2,239,456 34.48%
Total General Fund Expenditures: S 33,022,058 $ 893,244 $ 17,003,577 5 16,018,481 61.49°ti
srl s2006 8:26 ana
Ciry of Spokane Valley
Other Funds
Budget Variance Report
For the Period Ended August 31, 2008
Unaudited
Amended Tentative Tentative
Budget August YTD Unrealized Percent
m Revenues Revenues Revenue ealized
Other Funds Rovsnues:
Street Fund $ 5,922,972 $ 4,254 $ 1,023,546 $ 4,899,426 17.2896 13
Artehal SUeet Fund 850,000 - 16,677 839,323 1.26%5
Trails and Paths 30,000 - 618 29,381 2.06% 6
Hoie!lNEatel Fund 668,000 - 211,014 456,986 35.59%
Civic Facilities Replacement 387,000 - 402,476 (5,476) 101.38% 9
Oebt Service - LTGO 03 600,00O - 203,436 396,564 33.91 °.5
Capital Projects Fund 4,424,000 108,971 631,467 3,788,533 14.2996 5
Special Capital ProJects Fund 4,420,000 108,971 624,536 3,795,464 14.1396 5
Street Capital ProJecls 7,354,023 - 238,123 7,114,900 3.2546 5
Miratreau Point Project 454,000 - 4,987 449,013 1.50°r6 6
Community Developmi Block Gmts 245,000 - - 245,000 0.00% 5
Capital Granis Fund 11,347,000 1,250 359,741 10,987,259 3.17%5
aartcer Br6dge Reconstruction 5,862,00 62,988 75,202 5,767,598 1.28% 5
StarmwaEer Mgmt Fund 3,164,000 15,550 981,749 2,178,251 31.0796 13
Equip. Rental8 Replacement 784,004 - 11,550 768,450 1.4$96 13
Risk Management 217,100 - 1@8 184 28 906 88.6996 12
Reserves:
~ -
Cerrterplace Operating 335,000 - 4,641 330,359 1.39%9
Service Level Stabilfza$on 5,400,000 - 71,544 5,328,456 1.32%9
Winter Weather 560,000 - 7,661 552,339 1.37°,6 9
Perks Capital 4,260,000 - 32,272 4,227,728 0.76%9
Civtc @uildings 5,085,000 - 78,166 5,06,834 1.54% 9
Total Othar FundS Revenuos: 5 62,895 S 302_a14 $ S.~Z,f~01 S,57,205.294 ,2 °a
Amended Tentative Tentative
eudget Augus! Yi'D Unrealized Percent
2008 ExQenditures Exnenditures Exnend(tures eafized
Other Funds Expendituras:
Street Fund $ 4,242,304 S 468,134 $ 3,085,314 $ 1,156,990 72.73% 13
Arterial Street Fund 850,000 - - 850,06D 0.00%5
Trails and Paths 30,000 - - 330,000 0.06'!0 6
Ftotel1114otel Fund 668,OOD 74,308 241,051 426,949 36.0996
Civic FaaliUes Replacement 397,ODU - - 397,000 0.00%6
Debt Servica LTG4 OCi 800,000 203,436 396,564 33.9196
Capital Projects Fund 4,420,000 - 22,338 4,397,662 0.51%5
Special Capital ProJeGs Fund 4,420,040 - 22,338 4,397,662 0.51°,6 5
Stree1 Capital Projects 7,354,023 672,100 1,393,843 5,960,180 18.95% 5
Mirabeau Point Froject 454,000 - - 454,000 0.00% 6
Communiry Developmt Btock Gmts 245,000 - - 245,000 0.00% 15
Capital Grents Fund 11,347,000 45,755 2,728,515 8,618,465 24.0596 5
Barker Bridge Reconstrudlon 5,862,800 6,979 80,065 5,782,735 1.3796 5
StormwaterPvlgmtFund 1,963,944 39,298 817,574 1,166,370 41.21% 13
Equip. Rental & Replaoemnt 780,000 • - 780,000 0.00% 14
Risk DAanagemert 217,100 - 187,048 30,052 86.1696 12
Reservesc
Centerptace Operating 335,O0O - - 335,000 0.00%6
Service Level Stsbi6zbtion 5,400,000 - - 5,400,000 0.00°6 6
Winter Weather 560,000 - - 560,000 0.00°,'0
Parks Capital 4,260,000 140,269 862,855 3,397,145 20.25°fo 5
Civic Faci[ities Capital 5,085.000 75.000 5,010,000 1.4 5
Total Other Funds Expenditures: $ 59.511.171 $ 1.4g_6,8d1 S 9.719_377 S 49J91~ 16•33°~
W18/'1008 8:26P.M
City of Spokane Valley
i
Investment Report
For the Month of August 2008
Balances Are Tentative
Total
LGIP" BB Money Mkt'* BB CD Investments
Beginning $ 43,390,679.32 $ 1,655,362.86 S 1,048,944.59 $ 46,094,986.77
Deposits 1,950,508.53 - - 1,950,508.53
Withdrawis (2,900,000.00) - - (2,900,000.00) .
Interest 83,576.21 2,776.13 14,396.33 100,748.67
Ending $ 42,524,764.06 $ 1,658,138.99 $ 1,063,340.92 $ 45,246,243.97
Balances bv Fund
General Fund $ 15,407,485.08
Street Fund 1,362,545.33
Arterial Street 577,290.74
Paths & Trails 24,018.17
HoteUMotel 341,704.10
CenterPlace Operating Reserve 343,207.42
Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,314,444.23 .
Winter Weather Reserve 569,090.53 ,
Civic Facilities Replacement 406,732.44 -Capital Projects 4,288,379.93
Special Capital Projects 4,961,192.30
Mirabeau Point Project 370,47726
Parks Capital Project 632,774.46
Civic Buildings Capital Projects 5,782,121.10
Stormrvater Management 2,022,678.10
Equipment Rental & Replacement 780,458.32
Risk Management 14,784.11
Deposits Yet to be Recorded 2;046,860.35
S 45,246,243.97
'Local Government Investment Pool
Banner Bank
F'OOTNOTES
1 Received quarteriy
2 Three accounts in arrears
3 Transfers are pending
4 A1NC membership paid in Jan.
5 Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, aaquire right of way and construct.
6 No projects planned in 2007
7 Small amount of 05 library tax due district
8 Estimated, pending 07 review
9 Interest earnings
10 Most equipment fully funded in late 05
12 ins premium paid in Jan.
13 Beg. Bal. included which understates realized amounts and %
14 For replacemeni of vehicles & computers
15 For capital projects during summer months
;
9J18J2008 8:26 AM
MEMO
-
. ;
TO: llave Mcrcier, City vlanager
FROM: ltick VanLcuven, Chief of Police
DATE: September 15, 2008
RE: Monthly RePort August 2008
August, 200$• August, 2007:
CaD incidents: 4,769 CAD incidents: 5,034
Reports takEn: 1,416 Reports taken: 1,549
Traffic stops: 1,354 TrafFic stops: 1,443
Tra£fic reports: 278 Traffc reports: 319
CAll incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated o£ficer contacts. Hot spot maps
are attached showing August residential biirglaries, August commercial burglaries; August trAffic
collision hot spots and August vehicle prowling hot spots, along writh July and August stolen
vehicle hot spots. Please note the addition of the numerical values to thE hot spot maps as
requested. Also attached are bar graphs for 2006, 2007 and January through August, 2008:
coinmercial burglary, garage burglary, residential burglaey, forgery, malicious mischief, stolcn
vehicles, theft, vehicle prowling, and property crimes comparisons.
J
Al)iVIINISTRATIVE:
♦ A Project Safe Neighborhoods Anti-Gang Training Conference, hosted by the U. S.
Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Assistance, was held
on Aug. 19-21 in Spokane. Chicf VanLeuven attended an Executive Session of the
conFerence Nv-hich provided a f.orum for participants to address local gang issues and
discuss potential anti-gane strategies.
♦ The Chief also attended an event sponsored by the Axnerican Red Cross and American
FAmily Insurance at the Spokane Valley vlall which focused an disaster prcparedness,
family and child safety and emergency training information.
♦ Chief VanLeuven attended a Drug Court graduation ceremony in August. llnig Court has
been found to be an effective program in re-routing many drug offenders from lives of
non-stop criminal justice involvement to lives of health, safety, family rclationships, work
and education. I-Ie, along with S.C.O.P.E. I7irector Rick Scott and others, xlso aYtended the
Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Council's Kick-Off Celebration luncheon this month.
♦ During the month of Elugust, Chief VanLeuven was "on call" for a total of 19 hvelve-hour
shifts for patrol lieutenants.
.
Page 1 .
COviMUINITY ORIENTED POLICLNG:
♦ The annual Nalional Night Out was held on August 5, coordinated by Diana Somerville of Neighborhood Watch, and off cers, detectives and administration of the Spokane Valley
Police Department signed up to attend various parties and events given by Spokane Valley
residents and citizens. Chief VanLeuven was able to attend about six or seven of the
parties. \fational Night Out is a national program designed to heighten crirne and drug
prevention awareness; generatc support for, and participation in, local anticrime programs;
strengthen neighborhood spirit and police-community Farmerships; and send a message to
criminals letting them lcnow that neighborhoods are organized aad fighting back.
♦ Chief VanLeuven and Traffic Sat. Mike 7ollars met -Mth Valle}-fest Coordinator Peggy
Doering to discuss preparations for the annual Spokane Valleyfest event which Arill take
place in Septemb€r.
♦ In August, S.C.O.P.E. vrolunteers conductcd Operation Family ID (OFID) and bike helmet fitting at the Valley Mall. Eighteen new S.C.O.P.E. members received basic traiiling.
Volunteers f.rom Spokane Vallcy S.C.O.P.E. stations confibuted 2,188 hours of time
during the month.
♦ S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Tcam (S1RT) vohintee•rs contributed 118 on-scene hours
(inclucling travel time), responding to motor vclucle accidents; a structtire firc; two
wildlands fires, and other incidents. I.ncluding stand-by and trainuig, the volunteers
contributed a total of 540 hoiirs in August. ♦ S.C.O.P.E. vrolunteers who monitor disableci parking in tJ1e Spokane Valley issued 53
infractions, along with 76 warnings; in ihc month of Au-paust. Twelve voluntecrs
contributed 665 hoLu's to this prograrri.
OFERATIONS:
Congratulations to Dispatch Supervisor Carol Herrmann, who relircd in August after 31 years
vvith the Spokaiie Coimty Sheriffs 17epartment.
♦ Valley Man Cbarged with nealing Meth
A 33-year-old Spokane Valley man tivas arresteti Nvhen after officers discovered a tennis
ball-sized chunk of inethamphetamine in his car dtuFuie a traffic stop. Total weight of the
meth was approa:imately 42 grams. He was booked into jail fnr Possession nf
Mcthamphetamine «ith Intent to Deliver.
♦ Shoplifter Arrested for Felony Theft
Ayoung Spokane mother was arrested wben she was caught hiding stolen merchandise
underneath her seated toddler. Officer Eric Johnson responded to a shoplifter report at the
Valley mall, where store security advised they had watched the suspect walk around tbe
store and select merehandise which she placed beneath the seat of her cluld's stroller. She
was arrestEd for 2"d Degree Theft, Nvith the value of the hidden merchandise totaling $470.
Page 2
♦ Bar Row Ends in Arrest
Spokane Valley police officers arrested a 73-ycar-old Libertv Lake man after he threatened
to kill a bar patron and then later retumed to the business Nvith a loaded shotgun, looking
for the subject he threatened. The suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on a
felony count of Attempted 15` Degree Murder.
♦ Stolen Running Shoes Don't Help Thicf Escape
A 22-year-old Greenacres man was arrested after he wore a stolen pair of ninning shoes
out of a department store. Security employees attempted to stop the thief, but he ran and
then punched one of the employees whcn dragged to the pavement. He was arrested for
2"d DegrEe Robbery and for Possession of a Dangerous `'Veapon, after a"sap" was fotmd in
his backpack.
♦ Eldert), Are Targets of Fraud
A 69-year-old Spokane Valley woman was bilked out of $5,400 recently by a man who
called and claimed he was her grandsAn and was in trouble. Similar scams have been
reported sEveral times in the past few weeks, and it is suggested that citizens forewarn and
educate elderly parents and relatives that they may potentially be targeted by this type of
thief. Encourage them to consult Mth other family members or trusted friends before
~''ulfilling any request for money that they may receive over the phone.
♦ Drinking Ariver Destroys Railroad Iafrastructure
A Spokane Valley man destroyed two Union Aacifc Railroad crossing gates and damaged
a pedestrian crosswalk signal when he lost control of his pickup whilE driving under the
influence of alcohol. He was anested for IaUI. The railway was blocked for several hours
- while crews cleaned up the debris.
♦ ScraP Metal Thieves Target Valley Locztions
Scrap metal thefts have increased substantially the past few years as prices for the scrap
metal have also increased. A pile of scrap copper was stolen from Dickson Iron and Metal
and police are still seeking hvo white males, about 6'3" and 5'8" tall, who were observed
placing the copper into a gold-colored 2000's model Sonoma GMC pickup. In fviother
incidEnt, a 44-year-old Spokane man was arrested after he was caught burglarizing t1Vo
residences and items of serttp metal were locatEd inside his vehicle. During a third
incident, a 21-year-old Spokane Valley woman was Furzsted for First DEgree Itobbery after
she bit the man from .vhom she was stealing scrap copper and other metals. A Spokane
Valley employee was arrested for stealing $7;000 via his company credit card and another
$7,000 in scrap copper and brass from the company. A white male and hwo white females
stole 200 to 300 pounds of scrap alununum from A-Tech, loading the metal oil top of a
maroon Nissan Sentra.
♦ Year-Long Vandalism Spree Ended with Arrest
Spokane Valley Sergeant Doug Lativson found and arrested a suspect in a year-long series
of incidents in which the suspect splashed human waste on Dishman-area businesses.
Aware of the past incidents, Sgt. Lawson was patrolling the area and noticed that waste
matter had been splashed on another business, and he began checki.ng the roads leading
away from the area. He found and stopped a subject traveling south in a motorized
wheelchair, with a plastic bucket hanging from the machine. Sgt. Lawson called Detective
Kirk Keyser to the scene, and he ultimately arrested the suspect for First Degree 1Vlalicious
Page 3
Mischief and booked him into jail. Subsequent investigation revealed that the suspect
moved to Spokane Valley in May 2007 and began the acts of vandalism the following July.
♦ Prolific Burglar CaPtured - '
A fugitive sought by Crune Stoppers for numerous Spokane Val1Ey burglaries was arrested
by Police Officer Dale Wells after in.formation was that the suspect would be visiting a
home in the VaUey during the evening. When Officer Wells and Sgt. Rob Sherar located
the suspect and attempted to arrest him, he fought Aith the officers but was unable to
escape. He was arrested and booked on a felony Residential Burglary warrant, and was
cited for misdemeanor counts of Possession of Marijuana and Resisting Arrest. Further
charges werc pending.
♦ Alarm Salespersan Upsets Resident
After a door-to-door sec«rin, system salcsman exhibited rude and angry behavior when a
Spokane Valley resident turned down his sales offer, the homeowner contacied law
enforcement to check if the company tivas bona fide. Followuie this incidcnt, PIO Dave
Reagan suggested that residents or businesscs approached by alarm system salespersons
shouild not make an in-Lmediatc commitment to purchase the product, but should instead
contact the Better Business Bureau or the Washington Burglary and Fire Alarm
Association to investigate the company's reliability ttnd accotultability.
Page 4
`
2008 AUGUST CRIME REPORT
Aug-08 Aug-07 OS to date 07 to date 07 Total 06 Total 05 Total 04 Total
BURGLARY 88 5711 514 378 584 714 744 997
FORGERY 27 21 248 268 365 334 464 465
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 75 108 604 870 1,265 1,122 904 1,224
NON-CRIMINAL 79 80 626 563 839 811 749 916
PROPERTY OTHER 63 87 576 621 890 982 1,154 1,665
RECOVERED VEHICLES 17 54 227 251 343 403 333 390
STOLEN VEHICLES 43 7111 356 359 478 711 603 577
THEFT 166 18711 1248 1,289 1,881 1,888 2,256 2,853
UIOBC 0 0 2 5 8 11 8 10
VEHICLE OTHER 1 0 2 1 3 3 5 40
VEHICLE PROWLING 79 71 811 466 682 937 958 1,382
TOTAL PROPERTYCRIMES 638 736 5,214 5,071 7,338 7,916 8,178 10,519
ASSAULT 68 84 608 598 853 846 894 880
DOAISUICIDE 22 18 163 152 221 167 159 164
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 91 7311 731 580 874 736 762 755
HOMICIDE 'i 0 2 0 1 5 'i 5
KIDNAP 2 2 14 18 23 22 35 24
MENTAL 27 32 242 254 350 425 425 386
M P 8 10 63 53 83 88 97 106
- PERSONS OTHER 118 117 886 902 1,337 1,159 1,256 1,624
ROBBERY 9 2 54 46 60 58 56 58
~ TELEPHONE HARNSSMENT 14 6 57 54 73 83 92 190
TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 360 340 2,820 2,657 3,875 3,589 3,777 4192
ADULT RAPE 4 2 34 31 43 29 39 37
CHILD ABUSE 6 3 107 71 104 78 101 126
CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 9 611 50 70 92 105 88 205
SEX REGISTRATIOM F 0 211 3 3 4 3 64
INDECENT LIBERTIES 0 2 9 13 18 15 9 21
CHILD PAOLESTATION 5 4 44 31 46 69 67 77
CHILD RAPE 1 4 27 21 31 62 35 30
RUNAWAY 24 24 243 202 295 309 311 437
SEX OTHER 15 14 127 136 194 203 181 162
STALKING 3 0 16 10 17 17 27 35
SUSPICIOUS PERSON 13 19 92 109 152 177 244 341
TOTAL SEX CRIMES 80 80 752 697 996 1,067 1,108 1,475
DRUG 60 74 599 546 807 665 891 999
ISU OTHER 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1
TOTAL !SU 60 74 591 547 808 665 891 1,000
TOTAL TRAFFlC REPORTS 278 319 2,568 2,481 3,800 3,345 2,403 2,776
TOTAL REPORTS RECE/VED 1,416 1,549 11,945 11,453 16 817 16,582 16,357 19,962
~ i
Spokane Valley Commerclal Burglary
35 - -
30 - - -
25 i ;
i
20 - - - - -
■ 2006
. i ■ 2007
■ 2008 1
15 I = - - -
I
10 • - ~ ,
I.
5
0 , - . _ - - - ~
JAN FL=E3 MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
i •
c.n
f~~4~~ l' r s r~r, r~ i ~ " 1
7 ~ • ~ S ~ ~ 8.i
~ e rL .f'~• ~ 'i !w _ - E. I m ~
L y211 r l
t 4 . E
':o¢ ~7---T ~~~I i19 i• i ~ ~ ~ `PKUI
-1-
• _Jw M
~~!r,•~ ~c l. ~ :l :►A I=~ ' ~ ~ 1~ ? - ~i~a t]'•_:_~'
n. ca" _ lir wt oct~ •~i~~ ,1 ' ~ - ~ - ~ Mld , r,l -
deru yt ~ _ - ' ~ -=o al r- ~ `'1~`•r~
1•~~ r.41 w I~ J 1(nwo:
I eJV.. ti ~ '`._-t o S ~ 1 1Aa~bn
/IL~
~ ~
~ ~,I~ - _ ` . _ "4 I ~j~ ~'~n '.~1- ~ 4-
~ ~ ~r 7; , „n~• . ~
VW
t
R
IMMT~n i r~--{ •I - ~'~~_AI►1 d- . ~ 1 ~ _ ~ ~.'!c'-~' ■
1 ou~ie~1M~..- 1_
4 and
~ Main
r~ Anr
~ _ r . _,~ir•~i-~r!_~ , - - _ i y_. _ -•2 . • . _ ~ ' m o'-.
F-- T~ y ~ - ~Y-'~ ]r - iT . . , . ~ _ - ; . . ~ . i ~ , i_ L ht~' T ~ ~ _ U ~tt,~_
~~.~A-4 t.
"T. - I
14 • - ` ,~;`~i~ 1 6121
.
y r .t : ~ 1R+ _ _ , ' ry ~ l ~
q
aI
JI
f~~+ ~ _ ''h, .•__I S <
- ~ ~ ~
.
u ~ la
_ j9 • f ~ ~A,~,~ - ' ` i s ~ COrt1I11efLi81
~ ~ ~ ~ I3 Bur9leaY
~
2
~o-4~°i[ 02 _ 4
~ ~ ~]~rf ~ 'C •V 4~~ ~1~~ • ( 1 ~t+ e ~ ~
do T I ~ ~ y 4SIh s ~
MLOW
~ a i~ - w~ ~ L; R~ ~r~'0f ~ y0 ~ ~~.t u' oAAefhl1fY1
~ ~ ~i , _`~~~'LL►.n'yvtC~-"~► ~ ~ MHigh
C -
L ; ; M4i 2008 August Commereial Burglar-y Hotspots Map Pr~durrd. 11 September 2006 *
Spokane Vailey ResidenUat Burglary
~ - i
60
50 - - - - - -
I
40 I - - - -
I ■ZOO6I
30 - - - - - - - 102007
I I N20fl8
20 - - - ,
'
10 - ~ -
0 - - - - - r - - - JAN FE5 MAR r'lPr ti1nY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
w a_ i4',y
Cenfal
♦ XM!. ~ ~ p _ ~ }
. . ~
IE i a ~ C ~ ~
-ir 3 ~t
w r ~ 3
L
~aclR- FrsAw - - ~ .~t ~n ~ Wt. • +~5. L
~ e.~'~ f • ~ - ~i••,~ ;'!c _ -
~ ►•i' r ' ~ IMfq ~ o T~ _ ~ ~ s~'~f
~ - ~ ~ ~-I~~u~~ ~ I~aMT ~ y .J eii
~N4 lu.I
-7"
E ~ vu<<
COT"~ AMI -
~ ~ y ~ I ~ ~ ' ~ M.Yn ~ L ~1l~- _1a I.-• . I ~ r .~~►i},~
Ve:n _J_~
~ ooi ,a ~ l~~~r ~r y~,~--~ sm, i
so Fs _ tn ;
~
~
-f~crisan _Li - .Y^ - ~ ~aL 1{t1~n ~ ~
^:it
~I E g tir ' ti,.,' .~u:~ - ts ` F ~ ~~-+_-j.-.:- ` I Rl ~r ,:1` ~ d o ' 1 _ •
~N
♦+1
Q
ita # - 1 ' ^ _ , ~ tl E . - BiLha.qt~ -
- . h-- 25
a~~,,, s,: ~ , ~ _ ay►~_ 1 ~ , ~ r
• (~1 I ; , ' = i ~ q
Ll
,r RESldenbel
- ~ n ~►!Y , ° ~ ~ ~
1 ~ ' ' ~ eu~~v
_JTl ` r, i.'-~ e~keMt~~ la e~ 9 rt ~
~ ~ ~ , ~ , 02 - 4
~ s W * I
_ 4idi
Yy Y ~ {~Fr Gf~ ~ f+ ~ r ~ ~7'~~ - ' ~ ~ ~
T~ L~ ~~.OW
u ~ MMedium
~ ° I~,-. .~Y i 7. l~~ 'i • 40~4~ - Cj M
-
ts++~ ~ 1 , r, High
2008 August Residential Burgla ry Hotspots Map P,oa,,,od: „Seaember 2008
~
Spokane Valley Garage Burgiary
18 ; - - -
16 - - -
14 - - - - - - ~
12 ~ - - -
10 ; - - - - - _ . _ - - - ■2006
~ i ■2007
8 ■2006
~ , - -
g -
~
n - - +
E
2 - • r ~
~
~1 - - - - . ~ _ ~
JF,N FEB tv1f,P, APR W1AY JUN JUL AliG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spakano Valley Forgery
60
50
40
1 1112006
30 - - - ■ 2087
■ 2008
20 - ~ - -
i
10 - • , - -
~
0 - -
JAN FES MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AJG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Malicious Mischief
200 '
180 - - - - -
160
140
120
~E2005 '
100 - - - ■ 2007 I
-W2D08
'I
80 - - ~
60 - - - - - , - - -
40 - - -
20 - -
0
- JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JLi L. !',~~G SEP OCT NOV DEC
Property Crimes Comparisons
(2008 is January - August)
Zooo
- - -
1800
1600 r - - - -
1400 - - - i
I
1200
- - -
■ 20fJ6
1000 - - ■ 2007
02008
800
600 - - - -
400 1--- - - -
200 - -
0 ~ -
Commefcia! Residentiai Fargery Malictous Stolen VehiCle TheN Vehitle Prowiing
Burglary Burglary Mischief
Spokane Valley StolQn Vuhicles
90
80 - - -
70 -
~i
6U - -
50 - - E20061
■ 2007
40 ■2Q08
- ~ - - - -
30 _ - - - _ _ ~
,
20 -
~
1C i
p - - - • . -T- • J
,1Atv FEB ,Y1A►? APR tvt:.ti' JUN JUL AUC SEP OCT NOV DEC
r ' -a~ ~ ' _ ' ~ ~ • ) 1I-.
f,Mm~tt_ ~ ~ ,!a li'^i ~I., C.•n4►, ~~~a~l
~ ►.s - 1_" Sr~+' ~ _ ) j
~ _ - ~ ~ st' ~ ~
~ • ~ i I~ iTi~ i Z Y ~;'j ~f`
- I g
i Q ~ . . ^ ti Q[C
w ~ L
A- ~ ~ V~ry{ • E ~ . a !
' 10~ ?~Jm I~~ _ ~ ' ~iC!,~/1~~ • ~ KH ~ S3 ~ d
Euc1W
G~-1M ~ f, ~ . e~~ ~ ' '~a ' _rA ►.r-- \ ~ i I ' -
~ F,-° ~ ~ L • i~ , I - _
~1 b.I=
r!~, M~WVI4n
1 m, ~1~0-I - ~ L
~ yQ W ~...`•y"n4
R
r.'"~ I i - 71 I Yr. t
' t
101 F \ ~ t t ~ D~_"~-}r-!•1 , '"~--IF ~D.~-AlrtoTlLZ
II~- +1I
aW►~ ~ I ~ ~Ow , ~ ~ j •
ry~n {_f 1 w
rwdW-! ~',~,_,~.Y s•, o, ~ r- L-~,~ ~ ✓
• ~ ' ~ - - . J - 1'j~s .
► ML ~ ,c~rr'~ ~ ~ L.. G. . ~ _.r.pu~ ' ~ 1 S~! _C
i - ' , ~~c - -,I I
;'~~-~~n ' =~~'i?. -„~t~ t • ~ . inr~p 3b
Pva
ppln soTI I c$, ~ r
11`("!" .f4J.
~~~fl _ )Id ~A.~•~~. ~ _ __I~ i I
fLIL ~t` • i~~c~
l • ~
. ~~•L _ . ---`t t j ~ _ , r vy ~ ~
ar tz
t14
TT
rH~r. sP~~
.cun Cy
r \ , ~ - ~ i• a
fw nd r
_ =J'T, ~ ^ ' .
Ith ~--J i, , _
P r StOlen
' `r- ~ r ` ^~y! 1Mn r V ~ Vehid8
E 10 ~~v 9 ~`~r~
FA _
''+'~5e`' ~ l1 ^1 1 v 1~r. 1 t Y't-.`~ l• ~ V G'7
~t~~
y ~ ` rcr, _ .Otl W ~ ~u ~ ~ • y ~ ''~'p : i
~M~~ c ^s I ,ne FT ,r~-:-= L e.+r -o y• I OLow
UO I oMedium
1.~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L! frnR~ • y~ I,S I WHigfl
p+ f
0 ~ ; M~ 2008 July & August Stolcn Vehicle Hotspots Map Produred: 11 September 2008 *
3pokane Valley Theft
250
200 - - - - - -
150 ~ - - - -
~ ■ 2006 I
■ 2007
■ 2008
100 • - -
50
~
I
0 -
JAN FEB MAR /1PR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Vehicle Prowting
140 - - - - - -
i
120 I- - - - - - - _ .
,00f
- 22006
■200;
~ ■ 2008
60 - -
40
20
!1 - - - - - - . - - •
JAN FLB PJlAR APt=: r:'n`1 JUN JUL A U~~: SEP OCT NOV DEC
C!M
,
• ~ b ' • ~ 1~ ~
~ - .•1 ~ t" i ~ `F ~ ~ ` E . ~ , -
b F•.~ .m - _1
• - . . Fm~ha ~ l f ~ ~ 1
fL--
E~r'bt - Mt
a~ ~~~Y: ~ 1 ~ ~F ~ /h~~/' ~~r~~p~ ,M~ ► ~ •f _ ~ -
! ~•~re~M I • w. ~
"'R . ~ - 'w1`~ ~ ~_i.i'-•-' f`- ( n
f"~ ~ ` ° - _ `~h• - - - ~ 41 ' I~ I! . _ - t. ~i~; W s~b
I Y"r T
= I ~ u - - ' ~i-``~ ~'y -v , ~.a ~N°-~-~ . ~ +h { ~r~r~p~"." - ' ~
- s ~
~ [ ~ ~ IM~~-/ i~ .l_ . . `t' ~ . I ~ ~ '~T ~ ~y ' s o
r - ~ - _ ' ~1 ~ ~uln ~..F-1 le~ -t I ~ ` ~ l J i
.-'-L io'-
`1--'~~ r ~ ~~_7.~f •I - . ~r ~..~,1•~_• I ' J
~ -i_ ♦ ~ ~ `r i - . - ' „ ~ .1 ' - - ry r ^ .J ~~1 ~ ~ ~ it~ C - ~ " M U f~
y. a. M~: •;yt, f .i._~' " - - -;T ~ 'l•
~ ~J~'445L y~^n,~~ ~`.i I~-
W- f
d
' - ~_-Y ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~,w ► i ~ ~ ~
1 1 ':•n•~ ~ `:~5 ~ - _p~~ J d ~ w
E ~btsy~~
_ r~ ~ ' ~ • c ~ , , , ~'~,r,~ ~ I~I _ - ~ .r~+ 1 ~ ' ~
.
1 r' • ~ Tpn ~ PfOW111Q
~ 10 y aL~ 41
GZ - 4
4An,
k• `y ~
MLAW
~ • ~ ~3 mMeciium
f t ~,7~ f i~b„` WHigh
.
2008 August Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Mep Produced: t t Septamber 2008 *
; - ;S ~ ~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ :Z ~ _ r ! ~
C1nm~nl ~'~~~n~ o'•~'~ n~r ~ r b!!n rrande.
7 V
.4~~-.~-
~ ~U - . ~-'3, ~ wT=~ ~L S' _ ~ j~ J a ~
R La ` ~se m y~
~ `~.;w~
V
P~ :ii i~-:}? c~~a L
UC1
4 Ec
J k
'e ~ r r ~ F f
4 r , em _ 90 iiL -
4 e '
~t~: _l. IssK~n
a
W rac 1-- _ i '-l-~ _ k~ ~ i'1 l • 7.61s; ;i,- , -~~r.- - ~ v
~ - m ? _ - - ~ • - eCQLQIW
lo
~ S ~ • r'. i j ~ °1 _ ~ F ' - _
Sha~r
c~a a
~U 15
Prr,~dW L•M YrlC- ~ _ ~~•r~'h~j+p~ -v ~ ~ ~
b`pllriYw ++.'r..~-- C~.ir',"~'•m- _
~ m ~ 2n
I Cf~"~ I
_ 7. t• :F''r"~~ j~i -i,. _td ~i _'-~rt11~ r~~~~y ~ ~r;.~'~' t ~J __-`16m ~ ~ ~th
I)~~ . r!~r. -~c~•-' C C
4~~y _ r~_r• I t•~, ~ 1~'«ht~J'-` t> ~'1 ~ ~ ~
12111 _4-~
T h
tttr! U p
stnr
~ 10
~ ~ m
D
~~j
J
~ 1Gt
T on 19
3 "d - - -
~ 2 E c
7m ;~¢t, Traffic
Be e s & ~ Calllslons
~ i~' I-~1 Ufh, Sflrtn ~ V O 1
41 L 37 Om ~~t 1. ~ w 1'tS-,y _ ' daN ~ 0 2-4
~oa ih
d, ` `Ly ~ '4~tih N 1~~ O
' ?~'~~'~T ~ ~ h ~ \ ~ 0 Low
~-j O:h nk
j 1111111MMedium Lflw
ti~•' - f
° 111111110 Medium
L.-
; os ;MM 2008 August Traffic Collision Hotspots ~
,