2008, 05-20 Study Session
AMENDED 4(:F:NDA
CITY OF SPOkANF. VALLEY
~ CITY COUNCIL WURKSlIEE?
L sTunv sF:SSioN
Tuesday. May 20.2907 6:00 p.m.
CITY flAI.I. COi7NCTL ('IIAMBF.R.S
11707 East Sprague Avenuc, rnst Flnor
(Please tiilenre ti'our CeU Phones Dpring tbc Mecdng)
UISC'US51UN LEAUER SuE3.JE:C'C/ACTIVITY GOAL
Neti+ L•'rnplotee Introductions: Accumuar,c 13ru/ge1 _4natysJ Sirtirlec Wilson, and IT Spec•rulist Bil1 Aliller, ht• Finunce
Dirrclvr ka•n TJaompxon. Traffic lnlern 14fiche!/c• I'ieme, t77KI S1WAM-utrr /nterns Scoti Kneclu urui William %!c~Ycl.
by 1'ublic Works Director Nerl Aer.cten
ACT10N ITEMS:
1. Knren Kendall First Resding, Qrdinance 08-010 STV 0 1-07 Advance Ordinancc
Street Vacation 1pnblic cummrat) to 2"d Reading
2. titeve Worlc} titotinn Cansideration: litirker Koad E3ricigr Motion ('on5ider,itiun
I;id Award (public commenli
3. (ircg McC'urniirl. Motion Considrratian: Cpopcraiic,n A~rrcmrnt ?~lotiun Cunsidcratiun
I ur Cammunity Develupment Bluck c;runl zind
111►me Invcsimtnt Partnrnhir f'undti
[public commentl
4. Juhn }luhntun R1uUon Considcratiu»: Dcvclupnicnt Motion Cun,idcratiun
Agreenent: Lawc'sfKohl's ipublic commcntl
5. Scott kuhtn Motion C'ansideration: Land Acquisition Motion l'onsiderstion
Palicy PaintS (public commcntj
8. Mikc Stone Pool Conatroctioa Contingeacv Budgrt Motion Cansldoratioa
(pnbllc commenti
10. Stcvc 11'urlc) Avixtn ElrctriclF3arkcr Rcwd Bridge Yrojrrt Motion CunsiJeratiun
Mrmurnndum utt"nderatanding
RF,cuLAK sTtmv sFSStor~ ~TEMS:
fi. John Nelscm, Steve Spuler Fireman's Fraterna) As%ocixtion: I)iuussion/lnformation
(15 mirtutes) "Fill the Booi far Mu.scular Dysimphy"
7. Greg Bingaman/Ken Thompson Wcbcasting Disc:ilssion/InfoRnation
(?0 minutes)
1>. Stcvc Worlcy (10 minutcs) E3urkcr Road Dridgc/CH2M Hill Contract Discussion/lnformutiun
Arnrndment
tiluch tic~ti4~n ACL'rn11_ A1pN ?li, :I01R I'1F,c Iof :
1 I. C'3r} Dri;kell ( 10 minule") Storm 1)rainagc Eascmrnt n15CLLU1utL1Intormation
12. Mike Connclh- (20 minutes) C'ounty-v. ide ('lanning I'olicies ( Ipdnte I)iscus.;icm!lnformation
I?. Uavc Mcrc:irr (3U minutes) TransFxxtation Fitiancial Gap Analy>iS: L)iuu.5iun!lnfurniation
Finnnc:ial (?ptions and Fact,
14. Mayor Munsun Advnnce Agenda Additions niscussionllnformation
!S. lirfnrmaJiat Onlv /trms (wi!l nv1 bt disctcssed or rtported)
cz Spnktme ValleY I ire DepartmerrJ Am!►ulanrr .Srrvice 1►r1erlok•ul unc! Lelle'r
b. C_'onsultcml.Selecriu» (,itt('enter F_I.S
c. Depurtrnent Repurc.s
16. MaNor Munson l'uuncil l hcck in Discussion,')nfui-m:atiun
17. Uavc N1crcicr Ot} 1113naLir Comrnents DisrussioWInforrnation
A.UJOURti
Note: Ualtas Wherwise outtd abore, lbere will be au poblic commeals at Cunncil Stndr Sessioes. Ilnwever. C'oundl aiways reserves
the right to request intormation from lhe public and staR n appropriatr. Uuring mcrtings he1J E+y tht City of Spokane Vallcy Council.
the Cauncil re=Na the dght m tal:e "oetion" nn any item listod or subsequrntly acldrd tn the agenda. Ihe tcrm `aciion-fT1cIIR5 In dCI1hcRlt,
di~cuss. Rview, considtt, evatuate, or make a rnllectirc positive c►r atplive dteisinn
NUTICi:: Individuals pluming wsteend 1he moetirsg wfici roqurcr epecial amiuanex tu euvmaxodatc pb)a►cal. hearm& cX dher imaainncntj, plr,asc omtoLi
tfic Cio Clak ol (SIM)) 921-10(x1 m ncwn as possiAlc so that armigcmcrts may t+e medc.
Cttuly Scssnui AgeuL►. !11nN :0.2008 F'arc2 nl 2
Ac;Fr+uA
cITY oF srOxAKL V.u.LF Y
CCTY COLrNCIL R'ORkSIiCF.T
STULIY SFS.SIQN
Tuesday, May 20, 2407 6:00 p.ra.
CTTY HAI.L COUNCIL CEiAMBFRS
11707 F ast Sprngne Avenae. First Floor
(Plcase Sileace Your Ccll Phones During the Meeting)
DLSCU&SIUN LEMER Sl1H.TEC'I'lACI7VTTY GO-A1.
iti'e•w Empluyee lntrnduetions: :tcrowrtant'Budbet.-lnalyst Saydee if'ilsar, cmd 1T Specielist Bi!lAfiller, by F'ireunce
Utreetor Ken Thompsan. Traffic Intern Wichelle Plerce, and Starnrwater Irrterns Scott Knechl and Willtam Floytt
by Puhlrc Works Direc tor :Vei! Kersten
ACTION TfFMS:
1. Karen Krnciall rirst Rcaciing, Ordirwncc 08-010 S7V 0 1-07 Advance Orcfinancc
Strcrt Vacatian [pablic commeat] ta zod Rcad'mg
2. Sccvc Worlcy Mntiun Considrrociou: I3rirkcr Rvrui Pridgc Motian Cousicieratian
f3id Awarcl 1publlc commeat)
3. C',reg McCorniic4. Motian Cansicit:ratian: C'onperaiion Agntmcnt Motinn Consicic•rniinn
For Communih• Devclopmcnt 8lock Grant and
l iomc Investaient Pnrtncrship FunJs
iPubHc rnmment]
4. Jahtt E•iahrnan Motion Cansidcration: DcvrioPmcnt Motinn Considcrasion
Agroemenl: LoH•e'slKohl's (public commentJ
i. Scutt Kuhtn Motiott Cansidcratioii: Lanl Acquisilion Molion C:unsidernticm
Policy Points (pttblic ramment)
R£GI.71,1R STUDY SF.SSION TTF,MS:
6 lohn Nclson, Stcvc Spuler FirrmIIn's Fraternnl Associntion: Discussion:'Iniorrnation
(15 minutes) "Fill thc Boat for MuscuIar Dystraphy"
i. Circg [3ing3mun/Kcn Thonipson %Vcbcitsting Uiscu.ssic5ri'Infonnatirn
(20 minutes)
8. Mflcc Stone (10 mi►iutcs) E'ool Constnirtinn Conlingcncy Budgct Uiscussinn,'Intornui2icin
9. Stcvc Worlcy (10 minutrs) Bnrkct itaad E3ridge'C! 121Nt Hill Comtrsct DiscussionJlntornietion
Amcrtdment
10. Stcve Worlcy (lQ minutes) Avista Elrctric,'}3arkcr Itoad Bridgc Praject Di:ccussioaltnfnrniatiom
Mcmomndum of Cindorytnnding
11 Caty Driskcll ( IOminuUc:s) Stnrm Dr;u'ttage Essemettt Discuxsionflnfnrmation
12. Mikc Cunuclly (20 minutos) County-wide Plnnning Ptilicirs Updnte Discussion/Inforniatirn
~t~~ ~uian.t~rn~, hisy 1f1, 2AQ8 Pagc 1 of :
13. Uave Nlcrcier (30 minutrs) '1'r.snsporiation Financia) Gup Annlysis: Discussiott/Ltfonnaiian
rinancial opcions ana Facia
14. Mnyor Munson Advance Agcnda Additions Ji--cussion/Informntiun
15. Injormurfo» Only Itents (will rrot be discussed nr raparlcrl)
a SpnkiAte Valley Fire 1?~^r?artm~~ru : fm6rrlrn~ce .4en~i~~ lnterlr,c;1! ;in,: I,ettcr
h. Consullant Selectrvr: Crri, r_': tlrci FLti
c. Departmtnt Rtpwrrs
16. Nta~cyr Munson Council Chcc}: in Discussion,lnformation
17. Dnve Mcrcicr City Manager Cammcnts Discussion/fnforniation
.an.iocrRN
N(Nt: UQIC9s dlliCm'ISt ou1tLl lIIMVq (IfKt N'`II bK Nu g►tiDllt CDfltIpCllCf a1 CpilA[II S1UIfr SttfloOf. HONCvtf, Cnuncil otweys rnm•es
the rig6t to roqueet fafnrmadoe from tbe pubik snd atat[u approprLata Quting mxtutgs hcld by sLc Gty of Spaktne Valk}• Councii,
the Cauncil rescrves the right to tsi.e "eceicxti" on any item lilcd or subscqurntly a,ic4ed tn the ngrndn. The trrm "action" mca_ns to dr.litxrate,
discus.~, rcvicw, cons:dcr, cvalua[c, or mst:e n colie-c-uvr pttsiuve ur ncgatiNe deci=iun.
tivill'k irtditiduoli plwuting k► dlend dte amctmg whn rzquirc rpecW sest9tattu w kcommata:t phti.ical. heuing, ar other impnirtnemk pkrpe caunct
ihe Ciq Clek at (509) 9:1 • I OOU m woo u pouibk so tFut onanpments msy ba nuda
~llcl,v `c,s~:m .-~cnAs. 11ay';1. :i1t~R PaQc 2 ci `
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request [or Conncil Action
Meeting Date: MMy 20, 2008 City Msnager Sign-oR:
Item: Chcck all timt apply. ❑ consrnt ❑ old lwsiness ~ new business ❑ pnblic hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGEIr'DA ITEM TTI1.E: First RmdinQ YroRgscd Ordinance 08-010 for right-of-way Vacution S7y-
01-07 located soulh of Sprague Avenue and ac>rth of 1° Avenuc «est of Pinas Roud (SR-27) for the
vacatian of a portion of an allcy and concurrentlv dedicuting right-of-wati for the putpxise of realigning
thc elky appmximately 26 fm south of thc cxisting location_
DACkGROtIND: This street vacation camc bcfare City Camcil on April 10, 2007 under Resolution
07-003 setting a public heating datc for Mary 10, 2007 with the Planning Commission. Thc vacatian was
put on hold Mny 2. 2007 jLLSt before the scheduled public hearing wa$ condurted; no further pcoccssing
had takcn plac$ with the stree vacatian application. 1he awners noffied the City on March 12, 2008
tfimugh thrir cepresentative raqucsiing the straet vacation ta proceed. On March 25, 2408 the Council
adopted Resolution 08-004 setting a May 8, 2008 public hearing befor+e the Planning Cammission for the
requestvd strert vncaiion. The Planning Commission conducted the pubiie hearing as schedule on May 8'b
nnd vote 5- 1 to r+ecommend conditional approval of SN-Ol -07.
'1he appticant's rapresentaiive Mi};e Stanicar, Bernardo WiUs Architects on behalf of the owrers Tbomns
liamilton snd David Thompsc►n reyuests a vacation of a portion of an alley (15 feet wide by 300 feet
docp) and concurrently dcdicating right-of-way for thc purpose of realigning the alley approximaiely 26
feet aouth of the existing location. The alley is located south of Sprague Avenue, aorth af 1` Avenue and
%vest of Pines Road (SR-27) betwe;en Parcels 45211.0101, 45211.0102, 45211.0103, 4521 1.0104.
45211.0105 (north) and 45211.0119. 4521 1.0120, 4521 I_0125 (sauih). Pleasc refrrence map below.
~
. SPragucAvcauc _,_._.---•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•t•-
.
. ~
~ •
. ~
~ , .
. ~
~ •
. ~
~ •
. ~ ~
~ ~ .
~
~ ;
Robk Rnpd
_ } Pincs Rnnd
, - - (SR-T7)
~ - -l90lR~Ai3fY T8fiE1i+W - - - - - - - - - ~r i
~ I I I I I ~L. f~
1 _ - r I
1 • t
!
' I I 11111
~ Am b bt racm0 •
i Pattds Wbwsisa ROW b bc vsracd ( •~1111L1►1 t 1 1~ 1
~ Area pr~od d sew deY lonoon ' •
; i i ~ ;
1@2 Aveane
The E'lanning Commissiom made the following finJing-s as part uftl►eir rccommendation t., Citv CuunciL
1. T6c Plaaaing Commissian held n public hcaring vn Msy 8. 2008 to neceive testimony cancerning
the vacation of approximately 300 feet in length by 15 feet of aidth af an alley located berwcen
Sprague Avenue (north) and 10 Avenue (south) ofFirst Avenuc and concumently dcdicating
right-of-way for the purpose of realigning the altev approximately 26 fcet south of the cxisting,
nlley. The date of the hearing was set by City Council on March 25, 2008 by Spokane Valle%
Resolution No. 08-004. Notice of the hcaring was published on April 4, 2008 in the Valley
F Terald, the official newspaper of the City, wns posted in thrce conspicuous locations within thc
City, was provided to the petitioners and abutting property owners, and a sign was placcd on the
pruperty praviding notice uf the heisring alsu completed on Apri) d, 2008. Tfu siie has lieen
rcposted several times as the sier►s Ick:ited at the zust an<i «est end of the proposed vacarion had
fallen and/oT been removed.
The Planning Commissiun rer•ie«-ed the report prepared by the Spokane Valley Community
Development Department in dctail.
3. I'he vacation of the alley approximatety 15 fect by 300 feet will permit fuU development of the
property for bencficial uses and permit appropriatc ltvcls of maintenance. The realignmcnt of the
alley will take place appsnximately twenty-six (26) fcet sauth of existing alley.
4. The Public Worl:s Department has no objections to the proposal.
5. City af SpoF:ane Vnlley's Comprehensive Plan C.hapter 2- Land Use 2.9.1 Street Ce►nnac:tivity
states that Str+eel design can have a significant impact on community developmeat It alsu stste,
all new developments should givc special consideration to emcrgency access routes. Polic}• LU13-
7.1 calls for improved trRffic circutation amund and thmugh the City Center by cxtending the
street networ}t and crcaiing smaller blocks. StafTnotes there is aai cxisting building located to the
south of the cxisting alley located on parccl 45211 _0125 %vhich is neyuired to be dcmolished as the
proposcd realignmem runs through the middle of the building. A smell residence located on
parce145211.01?0 will be impacted by a re:duced setback from the renliped a11ey. Staff notes
the rrsidence shall bc located a m;nimcun of frve (S) fcet fmm the suuih pruperty- line of ihe
realigned nlley. Agency commcnts when applicable arc included as conditians of appmval.
1'ublic testimony «•as provided at the hearing; however na objc.°etions were reccived Ia the prupoied
varation/rrlcvation fmm the notice af public licnring nnd;'or routingy tv sinffand nterik~ ir-
UPTIQNS:
l. Move: to 2od roading scheduled at next City (.'ouncil Meeting for approvalrapprova) with
conditians (No new public comment shall te accepted since the public hearing has bcen closeci.).
I Deny the pmposed street vticaLion; or
2
.i. Schedule a public hesring that will be eonducted 20 cinN , atter noticirtv, in the rnail, (>n-sitc and
postcd three conspicuous places in the City.
RECONDViENDED MOTION: °Move !o advanee Urdirrance 08-0I (1 lu a secund readiirg. "
STAFF COrTACT: Karen Kcndall, Assistant Planner
.ATTACHMENTS:
1. PlanningCommission Rewmmendation
2. Plenning Division Staff Repon
3. braR Ordinunce 08-010
0 FINI)1NGS AND RECOMAIE NDATIOYS OF 1HE SPOKANE VALLEY YLANNLYG COiviMISSION
May 8, 2008
The following findings have been prepared by Staff for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence with
the recommended cqnditions of approval.
Finding,.s:
1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on Viay 8, 2008 to receive testimony concerning the vacation of
approximately 300 feet in length by 15 feet nf width of an alley located between Sprague Avenue (north) and 1'
Avenue (soudl) of First Avenue and concurrently dedicating right-of-way for the purpose of realigning the alley
approximately 26 feet south of the existing alley. Thc date of the hearing was set by City Council on `9arch 25,
2008 by Spokane Valley Resolution No. 08-004. Notice of the hearing was published on Apri14, 2008 in the
Valley Werald, the official newspaper of the City, was posted in three conspicuous locations wit:hin the City, was
provided to the petitioners and abutting property nwners, and a sign was placed on the property providing notice
of the hearing also complcted on Apri14, 2008. The site has been reposted several times as the signs located at
the east and west end of the proposed vacation had fallen and/or been removed.
2. Thc Planning CommiSSion revicwed the report preparetl by the Spokane Valley Community 17evelopment
Dcpartment in detail.
3. 'I'he vacation of the alley approsimately 15 feet by 300 feet will permit fiill development of the property for
beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels oF inaintenanec. The realignment of the alley will take place
approrimately twenty-six (26) feet south of existing alley.
4. The 1'ublic Works Department has no objections to the proposal.
O 5. City of Spokane Valley's Coniprehensive 1'lan Chapfer 2- Land Use 2.9.1 Street Connectivity states that Street
tlesign can have a significant impaet on communit), development. It also stales all new devclopmetits should give
special considcratiAn to emergency access routes. Pplicy LUP-7.1 calls for improvecl traffic circulation around
and through the City Center by eactendinb the street nctwork and creating smaller blocks. Staff notes there is an
existing building located to the south of the existing alley locatecl on parcel 45211.0125 which is required to be
demolished as the proposed realignment runs through the middle of the building. A small residence located on
parcel 4521 ].012Q will be impacted by a reduced setback from the realigned alley. Staff notes the re.sidence
shall be lacated a minimum of five (5) feet from the south property line of the realigr►ed alley. Agency commcnts
when applieable are included as conciitions ofapproval.
Recorninendations:
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore re.commends to the City Council that the vacation of a portion of
alley and concurrently dedicaLing ri~ht-of-~vay for the purpose of realigning the alley Approximately 26 feet south of the
existing alley located south of Sprague Avenue and oorih of 1` Avenue west of Pines Road (SR-27).
1. The completion of the street vacation (STV-01-07) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City
f.'or revievv within ninety (90) days followin~ the effective date of ~~pproval by the City Council.
2. The following easements will be retained for all necessary untlerground and/or overliead utilities. The specific
location of casements is a requiremenl: uf the record of survey .
a. Sewer: A portion of the sewer main is locatcd in the existing alley right-of-way (ROW), however most of
the sewer main is located on private property. Any plans for relocation of the sewer main must be
submitted to and approved by the Spokane County Division of Utilities. I'he Spokane County Division of
Utilities requires a 20 foot easement granting "Spokane County, its' successors and assigizs is jor the sole
~ ptirpose of constructing, irrstulling, operaiing, inaintaining, repairing, ullering, replucing, removing, cmd
ull ather uses or purposes which are or may be related 1u a sewer system. Spokane County, it's
'J sr.ccce.ssors and assigns ut all tinre.s hereina, f'ter, at their awn cast crnd expense, mcry renrove ull crops,
brush, grass or trees that »1ay interfere wilh 1he constructing, installing, operulinv nurintaining,
repairing, ultering, replacing, removing cmd all other uses or purposes which are muy b¢ relaled to a
sewer system. The grantor(s) reserves the right to use and enjoy thut prvperty tivhich is the su$Ject of lhis
eusemen! for purposes which lvill not interfere wilh the Counry's full e»joyment ojthe rights l:ereby granled; providetl, the Grantar(s) shall not erect or construct any b:tilding or other strueture or drill on
the easement, or diminish or subslantially add to tlie ground cover over the easement. The easement
deseribed hereinabove is to ar:d shnll run with the land. " A copy of the recorded easement shall be
submitted to the City's Communiry Development Director or designee.
b. Water: Modern Electric Water Company has a 6" water main in the existing alley right-of way. The
applicant states the water line will be re-routed to follow the proposed realibinment. Any plans for the
relocation of the wacer line must be submitted to and approved by Electric Water Company and installed
prior to completion of the street vacation.
c. TelephonelFiber Optics: Qwest Communications has overhead telephone serviccs loGatecf in the alley that
fced from the wesC and dead-end at Pines Road. A temporary/conditional easement shall be established in
order to temporarily maintain aerial telephone cables and utility poles in the existing right-of-way (alley)
until the property owner/develoner pays Qwest to remnve/relocate the facilities. After facilities have been
relocated, the temporarylconditional easement aan be extinguished. A copy of the recorded easement
shall be submittecl to the City's Community Development Director or designee.
d. Gas and Electricity: Avista Corporation has electricity and gas lines within right-of-way. The appliear►t
states the lines will be re-routed to follow the proposed realignment. Any plans for the relocation of the
gas and electrical Iines must be submitted to and approved by Avista and installed prior to completion of
the street vacation.
e. Cable Television: Comcast Cable has in&astructure within dle right-of-way. "Che applicant states the lines
will be re-routed to foUow the proposed realignment. Any plans for the relocation of the cable lines must
be submiltecl to and approved by Comcast and installed prior to completion of the strect vacalion.
3. '1 he vacateti al ley and real ignment shall comply with all City standards for removal of the exitin, alle.y and
improvements to rcalignecl alley.
4. If there is a conflicl with the realigned alley and existing drytivells, the existing drywells will need to be
abandoned and new d.rywells will need to be coristructed. Thc new drytivells will need to be rcgisterecl per
I7epartment of Fcology's Undergi•ound Lijection Control program.
5. Dedication of public right-of-way (R0W) far the realignment of the alley shall be submitted to the Communiry
Develvpine•nt Director or designee for review. Following acceptance of the ROW dedication the applicant shall
record the document and refercnce the recorcling number nn the record of survey.
6. The City of Spokane Valley Nire Department requires a minimum oFa twenty (20) foot driving surface and a
twenty-eight (28) foot turning radius for the eealigned alley.
7. The applicant shall submit an inteisection plan for approval to both WSllOT and the Ciry of Spokane Valley for
this alley realignment.
8. An access permit shall be obtained from VVSDOT.
9. The existing alley acccss shall be removed and WSDOT standard curb and sidewalk installed.
10. °I'he applicant shall submit ajid receive approval of a demolition permit for a portioii of or all of the existing
building located on parcel 45211.0125. If a portion of t1ie building is removed a ten (10) foot setback shall be
retained along the soutli boundary line of the realigned alley.
11. The south line of the.realigned alley shall be located a minimum of five (5) from the existing residence loaated on
parcel 45211.0120 a.nd portion of demolished building located on parce145211.0125. ~`-J
0 12. A boundary line adjustment (BLA) shall be comqleted tn move existing parcel boundaries to the nnrlh
(45211.0101, 4521 1.0102, 4521 1.0103, 45211.0104 and 45211.0105) and south (45211.0119, 45211.0120 and
45211.0125) bouridary line of the realigned alley following the public right-of-way dedicaCion. The applieant
may include the BLA process with the required recorcl of survey for the street vaeation.
13. Following the City Council's pa.ssage of the ordinance approving the proposal to vacate the street or alley, a
record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a reDistered surveyor in the SCate of Washington and
including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and spccifying if applicable any and all easements for
construction, repair ancl maintenance of exisCing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the
proponent to the Director of Community I7evelopment, or designee for revicw.
14. The surveyor shall locate at leF►st hvo monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way witfi one located at
the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with eacll streel or right-of-way in accordance with
the standards established by the Spakcrne Cour2ty Slundards for Road and Sewer Construction.
15. All necessary ea.sernenYs shall be shown an the record of survey and written ciocumentation from all utilicy
companies is required Co be submitted to the Community L7evelopinent Direclor, er designee verifying all
easemcnts have been indicaCed.
16. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated alley fmm public to private owncrship including but not
lirnited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fecs are to be borne by the praponent The Ciry will
not assume any financial responsibility for a.ny direct or indirecl costs for the transfer of title.
17. The coning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vac<3ted shall be
automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and
henceforth be subjcct to all regulations of the ea-tended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning
district extension inchisive of the applicable zoning ciistrict designations.
018. 7"he record of survey and certif ed copy of the ordinance vacating a street or alley or parC thereof shall be recorded
by the city clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor.
19. All cqnditions oPCity Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior tQ any transfer of title by the City.
Appraved this 8'fi day of 117ay, 2008
Tan 17obertson, Chairman
ATTF.ST
Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant
~
S o
VaHey'
i. .'1
STA,FF 12EPORT PROPOSED VACAilON OF A P012TION OF ALLEY AND REALIGNME NT 26 FF,ET TO
SOUTIi BETWEE\x 1srr AVFNUE AND SPRAGUE AVFNLTE
Prepared by: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, Department of Community I7evelopment
Date: May 1, 2008
Findings:
1. Abutting Property No. 1: The following parcel numbers abut the north side of the proposed vacation of the
alley: 45211.01 Ol, 4521.1.0102, 45211.0103, 45211.0104 and 45211.0105. These parcels are all owned by
Thomas Hamilton. No objection from abutting property owners was received.
Abutting Froperty No. 2: The follow ing parcel numbers abut the south side of the proposed vacation of the
alley: 45211.0119, 45211.0120 and 4521 1.0125. Parcels 45211.0120 and 45211.0125 are owmed by Thomas
Hamilton and parce145211.01 19 is owned by laave Thnmpson. No objections from abutting propert}' Qw11G1'S
WEI'C reL'e1VeCI.
2. Udlities: The following easements will be retained or rcrouted as noted by the applicant for all necessary
underground and/or overhead ttilities.
a. Sewer: A portion of'the sewer main is located in the existing alley right-of-way (1t0W), however most of
the sewer main is locatcd on private property. The sewer line drains from east to west and dead-ends at
Pines. The applieaall stites the sewer main can be eut back so that il' does not run tmder the proposed
building and without affecting `upstream' customers bccause there are none. A ncw manhole would be
approved and installed on private prnperty. Service would be maintained to the existing denCal building
and residences an lst Avenue. A noriion of the side setiver for the dental building will run across the
proposed realigned alley ROW. Staff notes a ttiventy (20) foot easement is reyuired by Spokane County
I)ivision of Utilitics. '
b. Water: Modern Electric Water Company has a 6" water main in the existing alley right-of way. '1'he
applicant states the water line will be re-routed to follnw the proposed realignment and shall be made a
condiCion of completing the street vaaation.
c. TelephonelFiber Optics: Qwesl Communications has overheacl telephone services located in the alley that
feecl frnm the we,st ancl dead-end at Pines 17oad. The applicant states the telephone service can be cut back
to facilitxte the prQpvsed redevelopment aticl service will be maintained to the existing dentAl building. Qwest may require easements if facilities flre relacated outsidc of the public right-of-way.
d. Gas and Electricity: Avista Corporation has electricity and gas lines within the existing right-of-way. The
applicant states these utilities wrould need to be re-routed eo follow the proposed realignment and shall be
made a condition of comnleting the street vacaCion,
e. Cable Television: Comcast Cable has infrastructure within the right-of-way. `I'he applicant states these
utilities would nced to be rerouted to follow the proposed realignment and shall be made a condition of
completing the street vacation.
All of the utilitv nroviders hsve been eontacted hv the Aanlicant and their corresaondence is attached.
The specific Incstion of easements is a requirement of the recnrd of survev. -
3. Stormwater Drainage fscilities: The applicant stated in the applieation that there were no stormwater drainage
facilities within the subject right-of-way. Based on City of Spokane Valley's Stormwater inventory, there are no
drywells located in the public right-of-way. Two (2) active dr}n4ells exist on parcel 45211.0125 along with
fourteen (14) abandonetl drywells.
4. Spokane Valley Firc District No. 1: I'he City oFSpokane Valley Fire 17epartment cequires a minimum of a ~
hventy (20) foot driving surface ancl a twenty-eight (28) foot turning radius. ,
~ 5. Access: The alley currently is being utilized for traffic circulation connecting Robie Road (west) and Pine Road
J (east) whieh most ofthe traffic volume is related to acce_ssing adjacent businesses located offdie alley.
6. 'Loninb - Zoning surrounding the proposed vacation is Community Commercial (C).
7. Trunsportadon - City of Sqokane Valley, Public Works laeparhnent cnnducted a need assessment of the alley
concluding the alle,y is needed for circulation. There are no objections to the proposed realignment of the alley as
it will continue to maintain current uses. City staff requires the realignment to comply with City standards
regarding improvements anc1 rcpair.
Washington Stale laepartment of TrFUisportation (WSDOT) hns the following requirements for this street
vacation:
a. '1'he applicant shall submit an intersection plan for approval to both WS170T imd the City of Spokane
Valley for diis alley realignment.
b. The existing alley access shall be removed and tiVSDOT standard curb and sidewalk installed.
8. Land Use - Cily of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan Chapter 2- Lajid Use 2.9.1 Street Coiinect:ivity states
that Street design can have a signifir,ant impact on community development. It also states all new developments
should give special considerntion tn emergency access routes. Policy LUP-7.1 calls for improved traffic
circulation around and through the City Center by extending the street net-work and creating smaller blocks. Staff
notes there is an existing building located to the south of the existing alley located on pareel 45211.0125 which is
required lo be demolished as the proposed realignment runs through the middle of the builcling. A srnall
residence locatcd on parcel 4521 1.0 120 will be impacted by a reduced setback from the realianed alley. Staff
notes the residence shall be lncated a minimum of five (5) feet from the soul'h property line of the realiDned alley.
9. Condition - The allcy is currently tiftccn (15) feet wide and paved.
~ 10. Assignment of vacated portions of right-ot=way - Absent objections from abutting properties owners, right-of-
wa y should be assi g ned to the petitioners. A bounda ry line ad justment shall be re quired to ad just the parcels as
the realignment of the alley (dedicated public right-of-way) is unable to create new parcels pursuant to Tide 20 of
the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). tlbutting property oHmers have received notice of the
proppsed vacation.
Conclusions:
1. The Public Works Department has stated that the vacation as proposed will not better serve the public as the
propdsal is to relocate the alley and keep the eurrent service.
2. The alley is utilized for trafFic circulation.
3. The implementation of the Draft Sprague AppleNvay Revitalization Plan may provide a greater use or need than
prESently cxists. 4. I'he Yublic E'Vorks Department has no objections tn the proposal.
5. The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan encnurages coniiecting streets and b1ocF:s. .
~
~
DRA FT
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUN-'I'Y, WASHLNG10N
ORDINANCE NO. 08-010
AN ORDCNANCE OF TFI'E CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, R'ASHTNGTON,
PROVLDING FOIt TAE VACATIUN OF A PORTION OF THE ALLEY LOCATED
- SOUTFT OF SPRAGUE AVENiJE; NORTI3 OF ls'r AVENUE; AND WEST OF pINE-S
ROAD IiETR'EEN PARCEL NOS. 45211.0101, 45211.0102, 45211.0103, 45211.0104, AvD
45211.0105 TO THE \`ORTH AND PARCEL NOS. 45211.0119, 4521.1.0120, AND
45211.0125 TO THE SOUTH AY\~ PROVIDTNG FOR OTFIER MATTFRS PROPER.LY
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City Council by Resolution 08-004 i.nitiated vaeation proceedings for a portion
of an alley (approximately 15'x 300') located south of Sprague Avcnue; north of 1' Avenue; and west of
Pines Road (SR-27) and concurrently dcdicating right-of-way for the purpose of realigning the alley
approximately 26 feet south of the existing location (STV-O 1-07) by providing that a hcaring on the
proposal would be held before the PlanninD Commission on May 8, 2008; and
Wl-IEREAS, the Planning Com.mission held a public hearing on May 8, 2008; and
VVHEREAS, follawin~ a hearing, the Nlanning Commission found ihat the notice and hearing
requirements of Title 10 Article IX Scction 10.09.04.10 nf the Spokane VaUey ARunicipal Code have been
met; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and/or minutes havc been filed with the City
, Clerk as part of the public record supportinb the vacation; and
O WHEREAS, none of the property owners abutting the propcrty to be vacated filed a written
objection to the proposed vacation with the Ciiy Gerk; and
WHF,REAS, through adopted City Code provisions, the City shall provide that the vacated
property be transferred to the abutting property owroers, one-half to each, unless circumstanees require a
different division nf property; that the zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of
the slreet shall attach to the vacrlted property; that a record of'survey shall be submitted to the Di.rector of
Community Development; and that all clircct and indirect costs of title transfer to the vacated street be
paid by the proponent or recipient of the transferred properiy; and
WI-ER.EAS, the proponent shall dedicate for righC-of-way purposes a 20 foot wide approximately
300 feet in lenSth area (as depicted in atiachment) for the re-establishment of the fllley approximately 26
feet south of its present location; and
WWE1tEAS, the City Council desires to vacate the above streets pursuant to Spokane Valley
Municipa] Code Sections 10.05.220 - .380.
NOW, '1°HERE-F012E, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,
Washinglon, do c+rdain as follows:
Section 1. Findings of Faet. The City Council malces the following fi.ndings of facr
1. The City Council set the May 8, 2008 public hearing date at their \+larch 25, 2008 meeting
through adoption of Resolution No. 08-004. Notice of the hearing was published on April
18; 2008 in the Valley Herald, the official newspaper of the City, was posted in three
conspicuous locations within the City, was provided to the petitioners and abutting property
owmers, and a sign was placed on the property providing notice of the hearing also
~ completed nn April 18, 2008.
C>rdinance 08-010 - Street Vacation STV-01-07 Pa;e 1 of 6
DRA FT
2. The Planning Commission held a publie bearing on May 8, 2008 to receive testimony - l
concemina the vacation and relocation of approximately 300 feet in length of an alley lying
west of Pines Road; south of Sprague Avenue and north of First Avenue. The Planning
Commission reviewed the rcport prepared by the Spokane Valley Community
Developmenl Depart.ment in detail.
3. The Planning Commission deCermined the streedalley would perm.it full development of the
property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance.
4. The Planning Commission determined that allowing the street vacation would better serve
the public considering the vacation would allow redevelopment of the site on the southcvest
corner of Pines Road and Sprague Avenue creating a financial bcnefit.
5. The Planning Commission determined ihat the relocated alley would continue to serve the
neighboring properties currently utilizing the alley.
6. The Plan.ning Commission determined that conditions would not change in the future to
provide a greater usc or need for the subject rights of way.
7. The Planning Commission determined that the general public would be in favor of the alley
vacation/reloration.
8. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation/relocation from the notice of
public hearing and/or routina to agenciES.
Secdon 2. I'roRerty to be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accorda.nce with
this Ordinanc.e., the City Council does hereby vacate the street or alley which is incarporated herein by
reference, and defined as follows:
7'hat portion of the ally located west of Pines Roud, south of Sprague Avenue and noriji of First
.
Avenue from its easterri terminus at Pines Road approximutEly 300 feet west as depicted in
Appendix A attached hereto; loculed in the 11TW % of Section 21, Township 25 Narth, Range 44
East W.M. Spokane County, Washington..
Secdon 3. Division of f'roperty to be Vacated. Pursuanl Co RCW 35.70.040 and SViMC
10.09.04.10.11, factual circumstances dictate a diflercnt division and distribution of the street or alley to
be vacated than one-half each to abutting propcrty owners, thus the property to be vacated shall be
divided as recorded in the reeord of survey which shall be created and recorded with the County as
required under SVMC 10.09.04.10.16.
Sectian 4. 7~oning. The Zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation
atixched to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective propertiy or lot lines. '1"he Director af
Community Development is authorized to mfllce this notatiQn on the official Goning Map of the Ciry.
Sec6on 5. Condityons of Vacation. The follovving conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to
the transfer of title by the City.
1. The completion ofthe street vacation (STV-0 1-07) including all conditions below shall be
submitted to the City for review within ninety (90) days followina the effective date of
approval by the City Council.
2. The following easemenls will be retained for all necessary underoround and/or overhead
utilities. The speci.fc location of casements is a requirement of the record of survey
a. Sewer: A portion of the sewer main is located in the existing alley right-of-way
(ROV), however most of the sewer main is located on private properiy. Any plans for %relocation of the sewer main must be submiried to and approved by the Spokaae
Ordinance 08-010 - Streei Vac3tion STV-0 1-07 Page 2 of 6
DRAFf
~ County Division of Utilities. The Spokane*County Division of Utilities reyuires a 20
foot easement granting:
"Spolurne Corrnty, its' s:tccessors cmd assibms i.s for the sale purpose uf
constructirtg, atstalling, aperatinp niuintaining, repuirinp,, altering, replacing,
removing, und all othEr uses or purposes ►vhich ure or may be relaied to u
sewer system. Spokrnre Caunty, it's successors antl assigns a1 all times
hereinafter, at their awn cast and expense, muy remove all crops, brtislz, gru.s.s
or trees that may interfere with the corrstracting, itutalling, opernting,
marntaining, repairinb, alterirrg, replacing, removing and all other uses or
purposes which ure may be relaled to a sewer syslem. T'he grantar(s) re.serves
the right to tise and er jay that property which is the subject of Ihi s easement
for purposes ivhich will irot irilerfere with the County's full enjoynient of the
rights hereby granted; pravided, the Grtuitor(s) slzall not erect or construct any
building or other structru-e or drill on the easeinent, or diminish or
suhstrnttiully crdd tv the grotnzd eover over the easement. The easemeni
described hereirurbove is lv und shall rurr with the lund "
A copy of the recorded easement shall be submitted to the City's Community
Developmcnt DirecCor or designec.
b. Water: Malem Electric Water Company has a 6" water main in the cxisting alley right-
of-way. '1'he applicant states the water line will be re-routed lo foUow the proposed
realigTiment. Any plans for the relocation of the water line must be submilted to and
approved by Eleetric Water Company and irastalled prior to completion of the street
vaca(ion.
~ C. '1'elepbone/Fiber Optics: Qtivest Communications has overhead telephone services
lociited in the alley that feed from the we..st and dead-end at Pines Road. A '
temporary/conditional easement shall be establ.ished in order to temporarily maintain
aerial telephone cables and utility poles in the existing right-of-way (alley) until the
property owner/developer pays Qwest to removeJrelocale the facilities. After facilities
have been relocated, dhe temporary/conditional easement can be ertinguished. A copy
ef the eecorded easement shall be submitted to the City's Co .mmunity 17evelopment
Dir2c;lor or designee.
d. Gas and Electricity: Avista Corporation has elec;Iricih, and gas lines within ri;ht-of-
way. The applicant stalcs 8he lines will be re-routed to follow the propnsed
realignment. Any plans for the reloaatiAn of the gas and electrical lines must be
submitted to and approved by Avista and installed prior tn completion of the scraet
vacation.
e. Cablc Television: Comcast Cable has infrastructure within the right-of-way. The
applicant states the lines will be re-routed to follow the proposed realigmment Any
plans for the relocation of the cable lines must be submicted to and appmved by
Comcast and installed prior to complction of the Street vacation.
3. The vacated alley and realignment shall comply with all City standards for removal of the
e.citing alley and improvements to realigned alley.
4. If there is a conflict with khe realigned alley and existing dryvvells, the existing dr}wells
will need to be abandonecl and new drywells will nced to be constructed. The new drywells
~ will need to be registered per Department of Fcology's Underground Injection Control
prog-am.
Ord'uiance 08-0 10 - Street Vacation STV-0 1 -07 Page 3 of 6
DRA FT
5. Dedication of public right-of-way (ROW) for the realignment of the alley shall be
submitted to the Community Development.Diroctor or designee for review. Following
acceptance of the RO`'J dadication the applicanl shall record the document and reference
the recording number on the record of survey.
6. The City of Spnkane Valley FirE Acpartment requires a minimum of a nventy (20) foot
drivi.na surface and a twenty-eight (28) foot tuming radius for the reali,,med alley.
7. The applicant shall submit an intersection plan for approval to both WSDOT and the City
of Spokane Valley for this alley realignment.
8. An access permit shall be obtaincd &om WSD07.
9. The existing alley access shall be removed aiid WSDOT standard curb and sidewalk
instaUed.
10. The applieant shall submit and receive approval of a demolition permit for a por[ion o1' or
all of the eacisking building located on parce145211.0125. If a portion of the buildin? is
removed a ten (10) foot setback shall be retained aldng the south boundary line ofthe
real ign@d al ley.
11. The south line of the realigned alley shall be located a minimum of five (5) from the
existing residence located on parce145211.0120 and portion of demolished building located
on parcel 45211.0125.
12. A boundary line adjustment (k3LA) shall be completed to move eYisting parcel boundaries
to the north (45211.01 Ol, 45211.0102; 45211.0103, 45211.0104 and 45211.0105) and
south (45211.0l 19, 45211.0120 and 45211.0125) houndary line of die realigned alley =1
followine the public rigbt-of way dedication. The appl.icanC may include the BLA process
with the required record of survey for the street vacation.
13. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving tbe propnsal to vacate -the
street or alley, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered
surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal
description, and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construcHon, repair and
aiaintenance of existine and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the
preponent to the Director of Community Development, or designee for review.
14. The surveyor shall locatc at least trvo monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-
way with one located at the interscetion of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with
each slreel or right-of-way in accordancc wiCh the standards established by t6e Spokane
CountyStandards for Road and Sewer Cons•lructioiz.
15. All necessary easements shall be shown on the record o1'survey and written documentation
from all utility companies is rcquired to be submitted to the Community Development
Director, or designee verifying all easements have been indicated.
16. All direct and indirect costs of tiUe transfer of tlie vacated alley from public tv private
ownership including but not lur►ited to title ccampany charges, copying fees, and recording
fees are to be bome by the propoiient. The City will not assume any fmancial responsibility
for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title.
17. 7he zoning districC designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to
be vacal:ed shall be automatically extended to the center of sucn vaeation; and all arca -
included in the vacation shall Xhen and benceforth be subject to all regulations of the '
Ordiai-inee 08-010 - Street Vacation S"1'V-0 1-07 Page 4 of 6
DR1FT
extctxled districts. Tlic adupting ordinance stiall sExcif} this roning district cxtcnsion
inclusivc af the applicable zoning distric,K designations.
18. The record of survey and eertified capy of the ardinance % acating a strrrt e}r alle) or part
thereof sbatl be recarded by the city clerk in the office of the Spokane Counry Auditor.
Section 6. Closiau. Eollowing saiisfactian of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall
ru:ard a certificd capy of thia Chdinancc in the affice of the Countv Audiwr, and the City M$nagor is
authorized to executt all necessary da:uments, including a Quit Claim Deed, in vrder to complete the
transter of the property identificd hercin.
Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Chdinanc;e s6a11 bc
hcld to be invalid or anconstitutiunal by a court of campetent jurisdicuon, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutioaality of any other section, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinancx.
Section . Effe+ciive Date. 7his Ordinance shall be in full force snd cffect five (5) dnys after
publicatian of this Ordinnnce or a summary therreof in the official newspaper of the Citv of Spoknne
Vallcy as providcd hy Iaw.
PASSCD hy the City ('ouncil this day of 'QUR.
f1TTT-.ST:
Mayor, kichard 49unson
City Clcri:, Christinc E3aijihrider
Approved As To Form:
Office of the Ciov Attomcv
Date of Public:ation:
C ffective Date:
Chdin;incc 08-010 - Svcc[ Vurution SN•Ol -07 Page 5 of 6
OR, t !7
Fahibit "A"
Property Descriptiun
~
. SpragueAvcnur
.
. ~
~ .
. ~
i .
. ~
1
~ i~ ~ii Ti 'ti'~ • 1
. ~
1 -
~
1 ~
~
Robic - ~ Pina Road
Ruad (SR-27)
~ . _ _ _
- T8fE9MP!- - - - - - - : -r .-:E1~K3Jti6l.$Y7~f18E~--'"
4--
. . _
; IIIII T ' ,
; ;
JILL
Am OD eC Y"Cd I I 1 I I I 11 l n I I I L! ~ ~
~ ihsutt ahrftiog RUw' m!+e rocated V~ . • ~
. ~
Mn propowd of ncw d{cy bcatxm
-LLLI 11 1 I '
~ - - ~
t"Avenuc
()rditwnce US-OlU - Sttret Vacation S 1-V-Ctf-(17 F'a,,e 6 af G
W Depart~nient of Communiry Development - ~
Plflnning Division
_ _sTV-ol_
- -o~_ ~
_______-____-a~c~uei►v~__-- _ - _ 4
- - - -
- ~ - -
- _ ~
- - - - - - - - - - - _ ~ ~ = - - -
-
L
:
~
t
~ j
~
e. ~
-44
~
- --MNO /1L.LEY-TafFalAN - - - - - - - f El(E1Nd 11i.LE^f TD BE VAlCATL•'"DI
~
C-i
~
Pi-oject Description:
,
, e7
,
Street Vacation Request to vacate ;
a portion of alley anci
concurrentlY dedicatirig ri(Pub-ot= ~ t I I ;
way i'or the purpose of realigiiing
.
the ailey approximately 26 f:eet • ~ ~
1 ~ ~ N
south of the exisiing alley. ~ 1 . l I_l I i I I' 1( l! I
1 1 ~
w Ave
`t~ nl~e~~~rtyt~~ent +~f ~'or~r~u~nit), De~velopmeaat -
Planning l~ivision
STV-01-07
• Adjacent uSes:
- Commercial Uses (Dave's ~ar & Grill, Hardware
Store, Surplus Store)
- Museum
- Vacant Buildings
• Axea of multipl~ parcels
• Provides for ~ed~~~~~pment of SW ~f
Pines & Sprague
~;ici►l~~t~ , . i~e~~,~rtntent r~t' [~ommiinx~° 1~e~~eluprr~en~
-~O~Va~ ~ - P~anning Di~isio-n
, - aw'.
Dillr'C~S BdC
af ] d G1"1 ll
' - -
.
~ - ~ ~ ~
~ ~ - ° I
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ,.I .
,
- - - .
~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~...a~ . ~ ~
.
. r..:" .
k r+~
~
F
i ~
~~4 ularccns
ir
.
F.xisling
~
residence
r
1'.AiS17Iig 'C~f3~11111e~"Ci~II ' w • ~
~ I
AreatoIrc veeated
~ 1 so.l ce4) a11Yt.4i~g vacNti,Hli _ _ _ - - •4.t'+ - ♦ ~ i * ~9~s.~ ~ p ~ ~ , ~ .
I
Lzl~ Prvposer# new alley Iocution
M
~
Department of Community I~evelupment • -
x~I i ~
j Plaiining Division ; •
Process
• City Council set May 8, 2008 as PC hearing
• PC hearing conducted
• PC recommendation (S - 1) to approve
proposal with conditions
QUESTIONS?
- - - - - - - - -
~I .
~ CITI( OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
~ 14Reeting Date: May 20, 2008 C ity Manager S ign-off:
Item: Checlc ajl that app l}r; [N consen# E old business ❑ rkew business ❑p ublir~ hearing
❑ informakion 0adrnin. report 0 pentliuLg legislation
AGEh1DA ITEM TITLE: Barker Road Bridge Project- Bid Award
G01fERNING LEGi~LATlOh#:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIQN TAKEIV; Approval af 2005-2410 Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan, which includes the Barker Road Bridge project, 2} Approval of a Local
Agency Agreement and Project Prospectus with 1lVSI]OT, 3} Approval af Consuitant Services
Agreement for Type, Size and Location Stud}r and Final Design Services, 4} Informational
Mema on this praject included in Council's May 6, 2008 study session packets.
BACKGROUND: The Barker Road Bridge Praject was adver#ised for bids on Friday, April I 8#h.
The scheduled bid opening date is Friday, May 16th. After opening bids and tabulating the
results, steff will preserrt results at the Tuesday, May 20 Council meeting to award the contrac#
to the lowest resporrsible brdder.
OPTIOIVS: 1) Award the Barker Road Bdcige Replacement bid to the Iowest respansible bidder
or 2} provide additionaf direction to staff,
RECOMlUIEIVDED ACTIOH DR MQT[ON: Move ta award the Barker Raad Bridge
Replac.ement Project bici to the lowest responsible bidder,
BUDGETfFINANCIAL IMPACTS- This project is 100°!o funded through a Federal Bridge
Replacement Gran# up to $9.985 million. Besed on current projec# estimates and expenditures
there are sufficient funds in the Street Capital Project Fund to cover the estimated construc#ion
casts_
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Vlforley, Senior Capitat Projec#s Engineee
Ne'rl Kersten, Public 1r1larfcs Direc#or
. ~
AFTACHNiEfVTS: Bid tabulatians will be provided after the bid opening.
.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM T1TLE : CDBG/HOME Consortium Cooperation Agreement
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Community Development Block Grant Program - Federal
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: In 2005 the City Council entered into a three year
agreement (2006-2009) to participate in the Spokane County CDBG/HOME Consortium.
BACKGROUND: Spokane County is now due to re-qualify in 2008 for fiscal years 2009 through
2011, the City is again the position to decide whether to renew its participation in the .
CDBG/HOME Consortium or become a direct entitlement recipient from HUD. In order for
Spokane County to meet its obligation under the HUD requirements the City must provide
written notice of the City's decision by May 23, 2008.
During this re-qualification period for Spokane County, the City must select one of the following
four options relative to its participation in the CDBG program:
1. Accept ent'rtlement status and receive CDBG funds directly from HUD;
2. Accept entitlement status and enter into joint agreement with Spokane County;
3. Defer entitlement status and participate through the State CDBG program; or
4. Defer entitlement status and participate as part of urban county with Spokane County
(current option that Spokane Valley is participating).
On May 8, 2008 Spokane County staff presented a request to the Housing and Community
Development Advisory Committee (HCDAC) from the City of Spokane Valley to create a set
aside fund for Spokane Valley in the annual amount of $300,000 to be available only to the City
of Spokane Valley for qualifying capital projects (hybrid of Option #4). The HCDAC voted .
unanimously (7-0) to forward a recommendation of approval of the proposal to the Board of
County Commissioners (BoCC). Due to timing constraints County staff will not have an
opportunity to formally brief the BoCC prior'to the May 20, 2008 BoCC meeting. However,
County staff is forvvarding the information to the BoCC for review prior to the May 20'h meeting.
County staff is preparing a resolution, in anticipation of BoCC approval, amending the County's
CDBG funding policies establishing a Spokane Valley set aside amount for the May 20'h
meeting. The set aside issue will not be addressed in the Cooperation Agreement as this is a
°boiler plate° type of agreement used for all jurisdictions participating in the County Consortium.
Staff will.provide an update on the BoCC action at the May 207' meeting.
,
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: "Move to authorize the City Manager or designee to
sign the Cooperation Agreemenf for Community Deve/opment Block Grant and HOME
~ Investment Partnership Funds subject fo the establishment of a set aside funding polrcy by .
- Spokane County specrfrcally for the sole use by the Cify of Spokane Valley for eligible capital
projects."
i 4-
spomtq C4UI~jf Y
CHRISTINE BARADA
COMMUNI7Y SERVICES, F"IOUSING, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
February 21, 2008
Ivlr. Dave Mercier, Ciry Manager
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague Avenue
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Dear Mr. Mercier:
Spokane County has participated in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's
(HUD) Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Entitlement Program since 1988 and in
the HOME Entitlement Program since 1991. Every three years, HUD requires Urban County
Consortiums, such as Spokane County, to re-qualify. Currently, Spokane County is scheduled
to re-qualify in 2008 for fiscal years 2009-2011.
~ The City of. Spokane Valley has been a member of the Spokane Counry Urban Consortium
since 2006. Currently, the annual CDBG Entitlement for Spokane County is approximately $1.5
million. According to a recentfy released breakdown of the current CDBG entitlement, the
proportionate share for Spokane Valley is $509,021. I have enclosed a list of the projects for
which past CDBG funds have been used in Spokane Valley. The annual average of CDBG
funds Spokane Valley has received is $724,115, for a grant total of $4,344,688 since fiscal year
2003. -
During the re-qualification period, the City rnust select one of the following four options with
regard to its participation in the CDBG program:
1. Accept.status as an entitlement grantee;
2. Accept status as an entitlement grantee and enter into a joint agreement with Spokane
County;
3. Defer status as an entitlement grantee and participate through the State CDBG program;
or
4. Defer status as an entitlement grantee and participate as part of the urban county.
(Note: This is fhe option thaf Spokane Valley is cu►-rently participating in). '
Please provide written notification of the option selected to Spokane County. If you choose to
remain in the consortium, please send me a letter by May 23, 2008 stating your choice. .
If you decide not to participate in the consortium, you need to notify Spokane County and HUD
in writing. The contact person at HUD is:
~ ~ Steven K. Washington
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
312 WEST HTH AVENUE • FOURTH FLOOR • SPOKANE, WA 99204
PHOrE; (549) 477-5722 • Fnx: (549) 477-6527 • TDD. 509-477-5722 ' RELAY SERYICE OA WASN[HCTOY:1-$00-833-6354 • avim.seoRnNxcouNrr.oRc
Seattle Federal Office Building
909 First Avenue, Suite 300 ~
Seattle, WA 98104-1000
The choice not to participate in the consortium means:
1. The City of Spokane Valley will not be eligible to receive CDBG and HOME Program
funds from Spokane Counry;
2. The population of Spokane Valley will not be included in the urban county;
3. The City of Spokane Valley will be eligible to apply to the State of Washington
Department of Gommunity Development for CQmmunity Development Block Grant and
HOME Program funds;
4. The City of Spokane Valley could accept status as an entitlement grantee;
5. The City of Spokane Valley could enter into a joint agreement with Spokane County.
If the City of Spokane Valley would like to continue as a consortium member, please review the
attached inter-local cooperation agreement. The agreement requires the City to commit to the
consortium for a three-year period, unless subsequent notice is given to HUD. Present the
agreement to your City Council for review, discussion, and acceptance. Please return the
signed agreement to me not later than June 2, 2008. Once the agreement is signed by the
Commissioners, a copy of the fully executed document will be mailed to you.
If you have any questions about Spokane County's CDBG or HOME Programs, please contact `r 1
department manager Tim Crowley at 477-4488 or by e-mail at tcrowlev(@,spokanecounty.org.
Sincerely,
~
Christine Barada
Director
Community Services, Housing, and Communiry Development
Encl: (2)
~
~ SPOKA,YB COUNTY COMMUNI7'Y I7EVELOPiMET'1'
13LOCK GRANT (CllBG) FiJND1NG IN TWE CI'I'Y OF SPOKANE VALI.EY
Spok:~ne Comity CD13G Entidemcnt Grailt 2003 $1 868,000 (city proQortionate share approx. S61G,44U)
1'roject i)cscriprion Year Amount
Spokane Valley Community Centcr 2003 521,574
Spokane Valley r`4eals on 1Vheels 2003 16,040
Big 13rothers aod k3ig Sisicrs-Trenna•ood School Program 2003 7,000
East Spokane Water Taiscrict 2003 100,300
OrcharcE Avenue Irrigstion Dist#6 2003 93,860
SC Public Works-ItID Projects 2003 38,948
C.4PA Special Assessments Assistance 2003 150,000
CAPA Sewer Connection ,Assistance 2003 150.1?00
Tatal $582,682
Spokane Counry CDBG Entitlement 2004 $I,831,000 (ciry proporliona[e share approx. $604,230)
Project DescriEitlon 1'ear Amount
Spokane Valley Community Center 2004 $18,000
yteals an Wheels 2004 20,000
Sewer Connection .4ssistance 2004 175,000
SC Pubiic Works-FLID Projects 2004 6,335
1'Veatherwootil0wens Strcct lmprovemcnt 2004 267,803
Carnahan Strcet Impmvemcnt 2004 108,162
CAPA Assessment Assis[ance 2004 175,000
I-lousing and Economic Dev, Planning 2004 20,500
[rvin Water Uistrict #6 20(}4 I58,900
Carithopc Irrigation Dist #7 2004 I 16 1
Total S1,065,900
-
~ Spokanc County CDBG Entitlement 2005 $1;737,347 (city proporiionate sharc approx. $575,000)
Pruject Descriptiun Year Aniount
D4eals on 4Vheels 2005 $20,000
Spokane Valley Community Centcr 2005 18,000
Montgomery Ave. I-90 to University 2005 439,550
Economic Dcvelopment Planning 2005 17,469
Sewer Connection Assistance 2005 437.000
'Cotal $932,319
Spokane Counry CDBG Fntitlemcnt 2006 $1,548,837(city proportionate share approx. S511,116)
Project llescriptfon Year Amount
Spokane Valley Cummunity Center 2006 $13.000
Spokane Valleylviezils on bVheels - 2006 15,000
East Spokane 6Va#er District 2006 118,980
Camhope Irrigarion District 2006 24,700
SC 1'ublic Works-Rlll Projects 2006 36,998
C.APA Special Assessments Assistancc 2006 116,050
CAPA Sewer Connection Assistance. 2006 212,004
Spnkane Valley -VerA Terracc Sewer Basin Paveback 2006 207,815
'1'otal $74d,441
Spokane County CDBG Entitirment 2007 $1,549,580 (city proportionate s>>are approx_$511,460) _
1'roject Description 1'ear Amount
Spokane Valley Gommunity Center 2047 S25,000
Spokane Valley A4eals on Wtleels 2007 4,604
East Spokane Water Disirict 2007 146,400
CrkPA Specia) Assessments Assistance 2007 105,400
CAPA Sewer Connection Assistancx 2007 100,624
Spokane VAlley-Trentwood Sexver Basin-Streei PQVeback 2007 77,706
~ Tota! 5459,734
F Spokane Courity CD13G Entitlernent 2008 51,498,32G (city proportionate share S509,021)
Pruject Descriptioo Year Amount '
~
Spokane Valley Community Center 2005 $15,000
Spokane Valley Meals on Whcels - Mcal Dclivery 2008 20,000
Spokaile Valley Meals oa Wheels - Senior Nutrition Site 2008 7,700
Carnhope Water District 2005 96,500
CAPA Spcxi3l Asscssments Assistance 2005 150,000
CiVA Sewer Conneccion Assistance 2008 75,000
Spokane Valley-Rockwell $ewer Basin-Street Paveback 2005 195.410
Total $559,610
'I otal Allucateci to City of Spokane Valley 2003 through 200$ S4,344,688
Annual Averagc - 6 ye:irs $724,115
SPOKANE COUNTY COMeV1UNITY DEVELOPMENT
HONIE INTVESTMENT PAR'TT"ERSFqP PROGtL4M FUNDI"NIG'
IN THE CITY OF SPOf:.ANT VAI,L.EY
Project Description Ycir CountyI-JQN7r Amount Total Project Costs
WaodruffHcights Apartments 1998 $645,000 $2,550,856
Villlage Multi-FamilyApartments 1999 252,145 1,400,000 :
Flidden Pines Aparmtents 2000 349,203 2,6,64,031
Esst Vyllcy Senior Fiousirig Apartments 2001 357,425 2,678,025
fER12 S.O.L.A. Homes (Sevcrcly DiSabled) 2003 446,700 493,420
IERR Valley h(ome (SeverelyDisablcd) 2005 180,000 275,534
Holman Gardcns Senior Apartments 2005 225,000 5,004,997
$prague Crossing Senior Housing 2005 164,486 759,767
CaLherine Johnson Coun A4ulti-Family Aparcments 2006 700,000 569.500
Total $3,322,959 S16,696,130
«L7oes not includc Teoant-Bused Rental Assistance or povm-Pay7nent Mornelsuye.r Assistaiice
~
~
CUOI'FRATIUN AGREEMILNT FOR
CONLMUiNITY DEVELOPNtEV'I' BLOCK GRANT
AND
HOM:F, U*TVFSTNIE\TMI' PAR1'NL•'RSHiP FUNDS
THIS A.GREEMENT, made and e.ntered into by and between Spokane Cotmty (hereinafter called the
County) and the Ciry of Spokane Valley (hereinafter called the City) this _ day of , 2003.
VVJTNESSETH :
NVHE1tEAS, pursuant to Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended,
inclucling Title Nq of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Housing Act, Section 109 of Title I of the
Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 and other applicable laws, Spokane County is
entitled to receive Community Development 13lock Grant (CD]3G) fimds for federal fiscal years 2009,
2010; and 2011; and
NNI1-iC'REAS, the amount of CDI3G funds to which the County may be entitled is in part depenclEnt upon
the population of other CD13G eligrible appliean[ cities and toNvns which by this Agree.ment clect to
participate in the CDBG and HON1E Entitlement Program with the County; and
«TFIEREAS, the purpose of this Cooperaeion Agreemcnt, which is entered into pursuant to, and in
~
accordance with the State Inter-loca1 Cooperation Act, RCW 39.34 is to plan for, and administer the
CDBCT Program and the IIOA7F. im~estment Partnership Program (HOME).
\TOW, THETtEFpRE, in consideration of the mutual promises nklde herein and the mutual benefits
rcceived hereunder, the parties agree as follows:
1. Tfie City may not apply for grants under the Smail Cities or State CD}3G Proj;*rams from
appropriations for fscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, the years during which the City is participatine in
the Spokane Cotmfy CDBG an(l HOv1E Program.
2. The City may not participate in a HOARE consortium e.ccept through Spokane Counry, regardlcss of
whether Spokmne County receives a HOME formula alloaaiion.
3. I'he Spokane Cowlty urban county qualification period is fedeeal fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011.
4. T'his l,greement remains in eLfect tuldl the CDBG and I•lOlvfE funds antl income rcceived for
federa] fiscal years 2009, 2010, and 2011 are expended and the funded aciivities are completecl.
The CaLmty and the City may not temunate or Nvithdraw from this Agreement while the Aareement
remains in effect.
5. The County and the City will take all actions necessary to assure compliance with Spokane
County's certificatinn required by Section 104(b) of theHousing and Communit), Iaevelopment Act
~ nf 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Tair Housing Act,
. 11':1EN'I`IT1A41120081Urban Requatificaiion 2009-201 l ICity of Spokane Valley eooperarion Agreement.DOC
Secrion 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, and olher
applicable laws.
`
6. '1'he Cowity will not use CDBG or HQME funding for activities in, or in support of a City that cloes
not affirmatively fiu-ther fair housing widiin the City's jurisdiction or that impedes the County's
actions to comply with the County's fair housing certification.
7. The City has adopted and is enforcing: a) a policy prohibiting the use_ of excessive force by law
enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals cngabed in non-violent civil
rights demonsttations; and b) apolicy of enforcing applicable State ancl laeal laws againsC
physically barring entrance to, or exit from a faciliry ar location which is the subject of such
notiviolent civil rights demonstrarions Nvithin jurisdictions.
8. The County and thc City wil] not obstruct the irnplementation of the approvcd ConsoliclaCecl
H.ousing and Community laevelopment Plan and Annual Action Plan during the period covered by
this Agreement.
9. The. County has final responsibility for selecring CDBG and HOiMF, activities and a.nnually filing
the Consolidated Annual Ferformance and Evaluation 12eport; Consolidated Housing and
Community ]aevelopme.nt $trategy; Fuid Annual Acrion Plan xvith the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban development.
10. The County and City are subject to khe same requirements applicable to CDBG subrecipients,
including the requirement nf a written ag7eement set forth in 24 CFR 570.503.
ll. The County's Housing and Community Development Ad-visory Conmiittee will review C17BG
program policies, plans, and applicant funding proposal5 and recommend to the Boarci of Counl`y
Commissioners funding of applicant prnposals.
12. The County's Housing and Communiry Development Advisory Committee will include three
representaYives of the City appointed by the T3oard of County Commissi4ners in consultation with
the Mayor and/or Council of the Cil'y.
This Abreemenl is entered into on this day of , 2008 by:
City of Spokanc Valley Spolcane Gounty
ll3vid Mercier; City Manager Bonnie Mtiger, Chair
Board of County Commissioners
W:1EN71TLMT\2003\Urban Requalificaiion 2009-201 i1City of Spokane Valley caoperation agreement.DOC
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business (9 new business ❑ public hearing •
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Voluntary Mitigation Agreement
(Developer) Agreement for the Lowe's/Kohl's Retail Center for
improvements to the Intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin
Road
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: UDC Section 22.130.030 Required lmprovements, UDC 22.20
Concurrency •
' PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Informational Memo May 13, 2008 Council Meeting
BACKGROUND:
The Lowe's/Kohl's Retail Center is a project located on Broadway Avenue east of Sullivan Road
by Black Enterprises LP. The project was a two-phase project; first, the Developer divided a
single parcel into 3 commercial parcels with a Binding Site Plan (BSP-01-07). Then constructed ~ 2 commercial buildings, a Lowe's and a Kohl's Depart.ment store. This project will contribute
increased traffic volumes to the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin Road, which will result
in a lowering of levels of service below our adopted standards. The project has been
conditioned through SEPA to mitigate the impacts of the increased traffic volumes.
Public Works Capital Improvements and the City Traffic Engineer previously identified the
intersection of Sprague Avenue/Conklin as meeting warrants for a traffic signal. Capital
Improvements has a tentative schedule to start construction of the signal in July 2008. This
, project's proportionate share for the construction and design of the project was determined to be
$147,500. The developer had the option to complete the traffic signal design and reduce the
contribution by up to $40,000.
Black Enterprises has agreed to the amount of the contribution and opted to pay for the signal
design. The design has been reviewed and accepted by the City. The total cost for the
developer for the design of the traffic signal is $39,053.21. Therefore, the developer will
contribute an additional $108,446.79 (i.e. $147,500 minus design costs of $39,053.21). The
agreement specifies the details of the payment.
The cost of the improvements is estimated to total $250,000 (design and construction). The
• cost estimate was prepared by Public Works Capital Improvement staff. The difference will
come from additional developer contributions.
As specified in the agreement, these funds will be placed in a mitigation fee reseNe account
and must be utilized to fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and construction of the project.
Any funds in the mitigation reserve account not utilized within five years shall be refunded by the
~ C ity. -
~J
This agreement is being expedited in order to prevent the Developer from accruing penalty fees
on the Letter of Credit obtained for construction cost.
OPTIONS:
Accept or not accept the Voluntary Mitigation Agreement for a proportionate contribution . ~
towards a signal at the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Gonklin Road.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager or designee to execute
the agreement with Black Enterprises LP.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Senior Development Engineer
ATTAC H M E NTS:
1. Voluntary Mitigation Agreement .
i
. ' 1
URA FT
Q -
After Recoeding, return document to .
City of Spokane Valley
Attn: City Clerk
11707 E Sprague Avenue
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
VQLUNTARY 1VIITIGATiON AGRCEMENT
~ 1.,owe's & Kohl's Retail Center
BSP-pl-07
This Mitigation Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Black Enterprises LP
("1?evcloper"), a Washin,gton Li.mited Liability Company, and the City of Spokane Valley ("City"), 1
political subdivision of the State of Wa,shington, hereinafter jointly referred to as "Parties."
RECITALS
1. Th.is agreemcnt is entered into by the Nanics pursuant to RCW $2.02.020 to mitigate a dirE:ct impact
identified as a consequence oF thc dcvelopment of the property.
2. The Developer is the owner/developer of cerlai.n real property of approximately 22J acres ancl
generally located north of and adjacent to Broadway Avenue; and is situated in Section 13, Towmship
25 North, Rangc 44 E, V►rM, in Spokane County, Washington. Said property is more specifically
described in Exhibit A attached hereto and by this refercnce incorporated herein.
3. The Developer has received approval oF the Bindi.ng Site Plan identified as BSP-01-07, a
commercial development which will create three (3) commercial lots. Traffic mitigation has been
required as-part of the approval pracess for the ftnal plat with the following condition of approval:
~ Voluntary Mitigation Agreement Lowe's & KohPs R.etail Center Page 1 01°4
DRA!'T
1. The dcvcloper is to contribute ($147,500) uf the cast for the dcsign and instullAtion of
the Sprague/Conklin signal. The developcr msy opt to complete the signal design and
reduce their contribution by the consuttant's design fee. This option would be subject tn
the following requirements:
a. The reduction for the design fee may not eacced $40,000.
b. The develogcr's cansultaot will prepare bid-ready plans, specificafions ancl
engineer's estimate to City specifications. Thc Citystaff will provide reviews at
60% anc] 90% completion of the plans.
c. Final plans, specifications, and estimate are to be completecl by August 31, 2007.
4. The Parties are desimus of cntering into an Agreement, which provides fnr the payment of a
proportionate share of improvements deemed necessary at the intersection of Sprague Ave. and Conklin
Road, which are a di.reet re.sult of traffic impacts assaciated with the Development.
5. The Develoner's contribution to the traffie signal shall be $147,500, minus up lo $40,000 offset
for the design for the traffic signal. Thc Ciry estimates the eost of the traffic signal at $250,000.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THE1tEFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hercafter set forth,
the Developer and the City hereto agree as follows:
,
l. Voluntarv Apreement. This Agreemcnt, including all attacheci documents, is a voluntary
'
agreement as that term is used in RCW 82.02.020. Thc contribution offered is proportional to the
traffic related impacts generatcd by the Development. The parties acknowledge that the project is
reasonably necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impact of the Development. In the evenl lhis
mitigation agreement is breached by the Developer, all oP the City's obligations under this agreement
shall terminate. In the eve_nt this mitigation agreement is determined by a court to be invalicl, the City
shall refund the nnexpended portion of tlie contribution, and the City's obligations uncler this a;greement
shall terminate.
2. proiect, The projeet shall consist of the design and installation of a traffic signal at the
intersection of Sprague tlvenue F►nd Conklin Road. The miligation fee is based upon the cost of the
traffic signal.
3. Contribution. The Developer shall pay $147,500, (minus up Co $40,000 ofl'set for the design for
the traffic signal) which has been determined to be the Developer's proportionate contribution to the
Project for mitigation of fiiture traffic impacts related to the Development. This traffic mitigation fee
shall be used fAr the design and/or construction of the improvements to this intersection.
4. Pavment The 17eveloper agrees to pay all of the above identif ed mitigation fee no later than
thirty (30) days after the project bid date for construciion. The City will notify the Developer in writing '
of the Project bid date when it is detenniiicd. If payment is not rimely received, the City may
immediately access the funds secured by the letter of credit described below. A letter of credit, which
gives the City a unilateral right to access the funds pursuant to this agreement from a financial
Voluntary Mitigation ASreement Lowe's & KohPs Itetail Center Pagc 2 of 4 J
DR9 FT
0 institution, shsll be provided to the City upon execution af this 3greement and prior to acceptance of
this agreement by the City.
5. Compliance "ith l7CW 82.02.020. Payment collected by the City will bc held in a mitigation
fee reserve account and may only be expended to fund the design, right-of-way acquisition, and
construction of the Project. Payments shall be espended within five (5) years of collection. The City
shall be entitled to reimbursement from the mitigation fec reserve account for any funds it may expend
for the design, right-of way acquisition, and construction nf thc Project prior to the collection of the fee.
Any funds in the mitigation fce reserve account not expended within five (5) years shall be refunded by
the Ciry with interest as provided in RCW 82.02.020.
6. Notice: Al] communications, nocices or demands of any kind which a party under this
Agreement is required or desires to give to any othcr party shall be in writing and be either (1) delivered
personally; (2) sent by facsimile transmission with an additional copy mailed fust class, or (3) deposited
in the U.S. mail, certifed mail pnstage prepaid, return receipt requested and addre,ssed as follows'
If to the City: City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Fax: (509) 921-1008
Attn: City Manager
If to the Developer: Black Enterprises LP
107 S Howard Street; Suite 500
Spokanc, VJA 99201
~ 7. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the bencfit of the successors and
thc assigns of the Parties.
8. Governinl! L9w. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington. Any action for enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent
jurisdictian in Spokane County, 1Nashington or as othenvise provided by stahrte.
9. Mndific9tions. NO modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the samc is
reduced tn writing and eYecuted with the same formalities as the presenl Agreement.
10. Waiver. No officer, cmployee, agent or otherwise of the City has the power, rigJtt or authority to
waive any of the conditions or provisions to this Agreement. No waiver or any breach of this
Agreement shall be helcl to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
11. Rearesentation. This Agreement forms a fuliy integeated agreement betw•een lhe Parties. No
nther understandings, oral or nther%vise, regarcling the subject matter of this Flgreement shall be deemed
to exist or to bind any of the Farties hcreto. All Parties have read and understand all of the Agreemeot,
and now state that no representtrtion; promise or agreement not eapressed in the Agreement has been
made to iclduce any Party tp eaecute the same.
12. Authority. Both Parties to this Agreement represent and certify that they have full authority and
power to enter into and carry out this Agreement. The persons signing this Agreement represent khat
they have authority to act far ancl bllid their respccti<<e principals.
CD Voluntary Mitieation Agrecment Lowe's & Kohl's Retail Center Page 3 of 4
DRAFT
IN WTTNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have e.cecuted this Agreement this day of ~
`
2008.
nEVELOYEit: .
By: Its:
Name:
STA`I`E OF WASI-IINGTON )
County of Spokane )
On this . day of 2008 before ine, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, peesonally appeared
to me known to be the of
the corporation that executed the foregoing instrument,
and acknowledged the instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the corporalion, for the uses
and purposes dierein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the instrument.
VVI7TI-ESS my hand iind official seal hereto affised the day and year in this ceitificate above Nvritten.
,
NOTARY PUBLIC, in and for the State of NVashington; residing at "
My eommission expires:
Printcd Name
CITY OF SPQKAN:F_ VALLEY: AT°TEST:
David vlercier, City Manager Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
APPROVE17 AS TO FORM:
Off'ice oP the City Attorney
Voluntary Mitigation Agreement Lowe's R, Kohl's Retail Center Page 4 of 4
~
EXHIBIT A
parcel A
That port:ion of the South Half of the Narth Half of Scction 13, Township 25, Range 44
East W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, lying Southerly
of the Southerly line of Primary State Highway I`TO. 2, described as follows:
Beginning at a point 20 f'eet North and 20 feet East of the West Quarter corner of said
Section 13, rtuuiing thence South 89' S1' East, along the North linc of 13roadway Avenue,
1,576.46 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the tract of land herein dcscribed; thence
North 0'07" East, 1,306.99 feet to the North line of the Soueh Half of the North Half of
Said Sectionl3; thcnce South $9'57' East, 1,038.72 feet, thence South 0' 14' Wcst,
1,308.73 feet to the North line of said Broadway Avenue; thence Nlorth 89'5 1' West,
along said Broadway Avenue, 1,036.16 feet to the Point of Beginning.
E.xcept that portion conveycd by Statutory Warrdnty Deed recorded under Auditor's File
No. 4676061 describecl as follows:
~ That portion of the Norlhwest Quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East
W.M., more particularly describcd as follows:
Commencing at the West Quarter corncr of said Section 13; thence South $9'59'36" E-ast
(Snuth 89'5 1'00" East Record) along the South line of said Northwest Quarter, a distance
of 1,596.31 fect; theace North 00'01'36" Wcst (North 00'09'00" East Record), a distaace
0f 56.00 feet to the Norih Right of Way Line of Broadway Avenue; thence North
00'01 '36" Vdest, a distacice of 259.35 feet to the True 1'oint of Beginning; thence
continuing North 00'01'36" West, a cliscance of 880.80 feet to the Southerly Right of
Way Line of Intcrstate 90; thence along said Soutlierly Right of Way Line; the follwA7ng •
two (2) courses:
1) South 73'47'13" East, (South 73'33'30" Easc, Record) a distance of 387.87
feet;
2) South 79'29'5 1" East, (Soutli 79' 16'08" East, Rccord) a distance of 65.48
feet; thence sAUth 00'0 1'47" West, a dislance of 760.79 feet; thence NOrth
89'58' 13" West, a distance of 436.03 f.eet to the True Point of Beginning;
Situate in the County oE SpAkane, State of Washington.
And except Broadway Avenue.
~ J
4'arcel B _
~
That porkion of the South Hal#' of the North Half of Section 13, ToNvnship 25 North,
Range 44 East W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokanc County, Washington, lying
Southerly of the Southerly line of Primary State H.ighway No. 2, described as follows:
Beginning at a point 20 feet North and 20 feet East oF the West Quarter comer of said
Section 13, and rurining thence South 89'5 1 ' Fast, along the North line of Broadway Avenue, 2,612.62 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the tract of land hcrcin
described; thence North 0' 14' East, 1,308.73 feet; Chence South 89'5 1' East, and 519.36
fect; thence South 0' 17-1/2' West, 1,309.60 fcct, to a pnint on the North line of said
Broadway Avenue; thence Nlorth 89'5 1' `Vest, along said Broadway Avenue; 518.08 feet
to the True Point of Beginning,
Except that portion conveyed by StAtutory Warranty JJeed recorded under Audtor's File
No. 9107240233 describcd as follows:
That portion of Seclion 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 Fast W.M., in Spokane
County, Washingtan, described as follows:
Begiiuung 20 feet East and 20 feet North ofthe Southwest Comer of thc Northwest
Quarter; thence South 89'5 1' East along the North Right of Way line of Broadway
Avcnue, 3,130.7 feet to thc 'I`rue Aoint of Beginning; thence North 0' l 7-1/2' Last 747
feet, more or less, to thc Southerly Right of Way I,ine of Primary State IIighway No. 2;
thence Northwesterly along said Southerly Right of VJay Linc to a poi.nt on a line which
is parallel with and 200 feet West (measured at right angles) of the la,St above described
line; thence Sauth 0' 17-1/2' West 805.5 feet to thE North Right of Way Line of
Broadway Avenue; ihence South 89'5 1' East 200 feet to the True Point of Beginning.
;
;
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
(tem: Check all that apply: ❑ Consent O Old business Z New business ❑ Public Hearing
❑ information ❑ Admin. Report ❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Land Acquisition Policy Points
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On April 22, 2008, Council authorized the City
Manager to sign a non-binding Letter of Intent (LOI) to purchase property owned by University
City, Inc. for a City Hall site. The LOI outlines the basic terms upon which 'the City would
purchase land from University City, Inc. .
BACKGROUND: In 2007, City Council directed staff to begin initial programming efforts for a
new City Hall. The City subsequently contracted with the Bernardo WiIIs/GGLO Architect team
to conduct a space study for the future City Hall.
During the development of the Sprague and Appleway Corridors Subarea Plan, the City hired
Freedman, Tung and Bottomley to prepare a master plan for a new City Center at University
and Sprague, including appropriate locations for civic buildings. The master plan includes sites
~ for a City Hall and a Library. .
On April 22, 2008, Council Authorized the City Manager to sign a non-binding Letter of Intent to
purchase property within property owned by University City, Inc.
That agreement has been signed by the parties. Staff now seeks Council's direction to meet
with the property owner pursuant to that LOI and begin negotiation of the Purchase and Sale
Agreement for property to site a new City Hall. Staff also seeks confirmation that these
negotiations are to be guided by the following policy considerations:
1. The negotiations should include, but not be limited to the following:
a. Vacation and relocation of Dartmouth Avenue
b. Property owners to divide property for purchase via a Binding Site Plan.
c. Specific definition of land to be acquired, currently anticipated to be located
adjacent to Dartmouth between Sprague and Appleway.
d. Valuation of property as of the date the LOI was agreed to and signed by both
parties. ,
e. Purchase price to be determined by an appraisal process similar to that process
used by the Spokane County Library District in their purchase and sale
agreement. Staff will explore possibility of using the appraisal work done on the
Library DistricYs purchase and sale agreement. f. Removal of existing buildings, including the former Crescent building (currently a
call center) located across the future Dartmouth from the proposed City Hall site
prior to occupancy of City hall or sooner if necessary for the construction of
~ Dartmouth.
g. Staff to explore financing/ownership options that are allowed by state law for the
future City Hall. .
OPTIONS:
1. Direct staff to proceed as outlined.
2. Direct staff to consider other negotiation points.
3. Other council direction.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move that staff be authorized to initiate negotiations
using the policy points as outlined herein.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City is utilizing ClearPath, LLC, in property negotiations.
At this time, the current contract with ClearPath includes sufficient budget remaining for property
negotiations. However, if the length of and time required for negotiations is excessive,
ClearPath's budget may need to be augmented.
STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Senior Planner
Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Dave Mercier, City Manager
r
. /
. .
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check ail that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information Z admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Fireman's Fraternal Association: "Fill the Boot° for Muscular Dystrophy
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: BACKGROUND: John Nelson and Steve Spuler will discuss the Fireman's Fraternal
Association in connection with the GFill the Book" for Muscular Dystrophy.
OPTIONS: RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHIIfIENTS:
~J
~ a ►n. -e ~ ~ OP- r q
~
O . ,AeY pit,
~
.
Background of Fill the Boot for Muscular I?ystronbv ~ocala`~6 .
History of Fill the Boot '
• The Fill the Boot c,ampaign for the Muscular Dystrophy Association is a 54 ycar tradition that takes place in busy street intcrsectians in hundreds of cities and
- towns across the United States and Canada. MDA and firefighters have
developed the Fill the Boot campaign over the years, fine iuning it for safcty,
publicity, and to generate a positive impact on the city.
• Firefighters have raised more than $300 millinn for MDA since 1954. They
raised more than $25 million in 2007 alone through Fill the Boot. TheSe amounts
have made the IAFF and firefighters the largest fundraisEr and sponsor or MDA.
• Washington fuefighters raised morc than $672,4331ast year alone in Washington
State.
~ • Spokane Valley Fi_refighters have participated in the Fill the Boot program for
more than 24 years and have raised more than $214;000 to date for MDA. Spokane Valley Firefighters Loca] #876 has ranked up in the top 10 in
Washington State for Fill the noot incorne. • Spokane Valley Fire Department Chiefs and Commissioners fully support the
MTaA Fill the Boot campaign as a program. They realize the positivc community
relations and PR it gencrates, it encourages gositive interactions with the
communities we serve, and they k-now that the firefighters enjoy helping agood
charitable cause. The depariment has shown their support by allowing trucks to
come to the collcction points to assist and be on display to lielp with the awareness of those driving by.
• Annually the SPokane Valley Firefighters coordinate the day of the event to
coincide with the county effort, joining forces with Spokane City Fire, Spokane
County Fire Districts 4, 8; 9, 10 and Stevens County Fire District Other .
participants regionally include Cheney and Medical Lake Nire Departments. _
• Our firefighters are approached with questions a.nnually as to when Fill the Boot
~ is to occur because people save up their change and extra cash to donate.
~ • This is an event that ev ' eryone can be a part of the magic that is Fill the Boot.
They don't have to own a business to sponsor it; they don't have to have a lot of
- money as every penny counts.
Intcrsection Tradition
•Fill ihe Boot across the State of Washington and across the nation, primarily
operates at the city's busiest intersection(s) with no laue closures required for the
event. '
• Below are a few examples of successfully run intersections locally and through
the state.
o North Spokane: FranCis Q Maple & Ash / Francis @ Market Street -
o North Division: Norkh Division X and Country Holmes Blvd.
o Downtown Spokane: Division & Spokane Falls Blvd. '
o Spokane: Market & Greene Streets
o South Hill: 291" & Regal .
o Spokane Valley: Sprague & Sullivan
o Spokane Valley: Argonne & Montgomery
o Seaftle: Mercer & Fairview / Pine & 5`h (downtown outside Westlake
' Center) oFcderal Way: Pacific Hwy & 320'h Ave.
• 'MTaA and firefghier's goal is io have no impact on the regular flow af trdffic . • ,
• The cvent has been dcveloped over 54 years with many methods tested - our
current operations have proven successful. .
Safety Record and Liability Lssues
• The track record for Fill the Boot proves safety is a major coneern for IvIDA and
firefighters. It is a national fundraiser for MDA that has talcen place in thousands '
of communities acr4ss the country for 54 years Without problems. In this time,
thcre have been viriually no major incidents, complaints or negative publicity -
regarding the program. There is always a small minority thal complains annually
and usually don't just complain about the one event. Thousands and thousands of
professional and volunteer firefighters take to the streets every year without
incident, and this has be,en happening for 54 yeazs - it's tried and true.
• Firefighters are trained, public safety officers who have extensive experience
' working on roadways, often under extreme hazardous conditions. Their job
rcquires them to be continually aware of an unsafe situation and react in a calm, collected manner. ThEy conduct their Fill the Boot program with every safety
precaution in mind. -
~ • The Fill the goot campaign is very different from panhandlers, newspaper sellcrs,
youth groups, alhletic organizations, churches or other inexperienced
organizations, since they are not trained public safety officers. Olher
organizations do not have the national recognition and set procedures for safety ~
measurES.
O • MDA has a liability insurance policy in the amount of $1 million per occunence
that already covers fire fighters conducting Fill the Boot drives.
Spokane Valley Firefighters Safety Measures
• Safety measures include posters and signs, and sandwich boards stating "Fill the
Boot Ahead" and "Voluntary Toll for MDA Ahead" placed approximately a block
prior to the intersection to warn oncoming traffic.
• Orange cones are placed on the center lines down the lanes for a distance back to help make drivers more alert and to providc a higher level of safety for our
personnel.
• Posters and signs are placed on poles along the routes. Signs are also anchored to
cones vi& a stick to make the signs at eye level.
• Banners are placed along the sides of the road between polcs and/or on
vehicles/apparatus.
• Individuals are in uniform to idenlify themselves with the eveni and stand out to
traffic. Non-trained persoiulel are in Fill the Boot t-sbirts to identify themselves
,Arith the event while on the sidewalks. 0 • There is a safety briefmg to all personnel prior io their starting thc event wherE Nve highlight traffic safety and the importance of keeping traffic moving when a light
turns green. If someone tries to stop we tell them to keep going or pull into the
parking lot.
• A new item we would like to implemcnt is a safety contract thai w711 be signed by
each participtxnt prior to being given a boot and beginning to colleet rnoney.
Fill thc Boot Day of Event
• Firefighters gather at our event site io set up; get safety briefing, sign contract, get
water and are designated a side of itie strcet to wark.
• Each fixefighter is equippcd with a boot sign, a boot and Fill the Boot stickers
. o Stickers are given to eacb person who donates. Stickers double as public
safety education with fue safety tips on back.
o If a,n individual drives thraugh aFill the Boot intersection again after
' donating, they can hold the sticker up indicating they have already
donated.
• Onee thE traffic light turns red, firefighters walk the sidewalk and center lines of
~ traffic holding up their boots and saying "Fill the Boot for Muscular Dystrophy."
Individuals will roll doNvn their windows and drop their donation in the boot. The '
O firef ghter then hands them a sticker and thanks them.
• 2-4 firefighters will be designated to each side of the sireet. This makes the l~
collection of donations movE quicker down the line of traffic - ensuring all
donations can be collected prior to the light tuming green.
• Once the light turns green, firefightcrs return lo the sidewalk and walk back
towards the top of the intersection and wait for the red light.
• Firefighters must not collect donation during a green light or impede traffic in any way. We are responsible to keep a clean flow through lhe intersectinn. o Individuals interested in donating during a green light are directed to a nearby parking lot to donate.
o Firefighters are instructed to wave people through the green light who may
be holding money out the vvindow.
MllA Facts -
• MDA receives no government funding for any servicES provided to client
families.
• 84% of each dollar raised stays in the local community and directly supports
MDA client families. .
• Client needs would not be met was it not for local fundraisers such as Spokane
Valleys Fill ihe Boot drive.
• Spokane Valley Fircfighters Local #$76 ha.s been one of the strongest Spokane
County corporate contributors for over 20 years. .
• Local research is currently being done at the UnivErsity of Washington. It is
partially fiulded c'~irectly from MDA through programs such as the Spokane
Valley Fill the Boot.
MDA Services & Costs Cost
• Purchase of a wheelchair (or other durable riiedical equipment) $2,000
• Summer Camp for one week $600
• Clinic visit (initial diagnosis, follow up medical care, family testing, Ete.) $200
• Physical therapy, occupational therapy or respiratory therapy $150
• Support group $100
• One minute of research $65 • Flu shot $25
Spokane Valley and Spokane Cuunty Client Population
Total Clients
• Spokane Valley - TBD
~ • Spokane County - 217
ALS (Lou Gherigh's Disease) Clicnt Count
• Spokane Valley - TBU . ~
• Spokane County -14
a ,,AQyF~~.
zo"~1~6 Spokane Valley Firefighters Fill the }3oot Safety Contrxct
o I have received the safety trainin; from Valley Firefighters Local #876 & MDA. 0 1 will be in uniform (ar FTB T-shirt for non-uniform personnel) at all times while
participating in the event.
o INvill not accept donations when the light is green.
. o I will encourage those who still want to donaie to drive inta a safely reachable
-park.irig lot to clonate safely or wave them through the intersection.
o T will remain within only the intersection(s) authorized by permit for this event.
o I will obey all traffic laws.
O o 1Nvill remember I am representina Spokane Valley Firefighter.s Lacal #876 and
MD.A at all times. •
Signature• Date•
Printed Name:
,
I
~
b1AR-26-2008 01:27PN FROWNUSCUTAR DYSTROPHY +5093253901 T-452 P.008/012 F-186
WI-v~tuu~ va•vaco n.m.r•• ~ • • ~
SpEciAL PLICe LATT AON
~ EvENT ~PERNaT
98402
To be sub~it0ed to the City CleNcs GffGe, ~~ent~ho e (253) 59~5'178 ~ma, WA
Sp ~ys before Prop~s~
Pie3se read infvmiation orti aPph►'ng for a SRecial Everrt Rern* befare ~p^a~ n9 ~is appfcagon. Answer a11
questEons in ink (ple~e prlTt). ~A (Not AppliCable) where PP
Qt~ol'~1dt~M1 ~ ~ifG ~ fVA -
mton
~ftYOWS $PONSOFtING AGENCY (ff I~1~T'C~LtNAP~C~
NAME OF A~PL]GANT . :
7G'1 - 2- 3 ~ i~'jtr A" 6 ,
• aP tottor++ai
aooREss (sTREEt, cmr, s'r. )
PHOKE NUMBER
r~otlrveu~s e VA0`Usat ' G ' .
pAx NuanaER
EMAIL AODRESS ,
Type of Event. C] Community Celebradon
O RunlWaik ~ Parade
0 9lock PartY E3 Street Fair ~ OthBr Mal
-
o
atj•
NAME OR TITLE OP EVEN7:
ASR
LocAriart ANp oESCR►PnoN oF EVENr.
a M To: AM!'
~ cfl ~ u ~ -~.s _ Fro,,:
Rate ot Event - Total MtlcipaUed Attendance AcWal Eti+ent Hours
11st $ny stteet(s} requiring dosure as a =uft of this evertt. lndude street name(s), date and time of closing
and revpening:
RaUTE To BE TRAVELF-D ftf nPPuraer.q ,
apPROX~s~►~ TIME oF EvEnrT= S
nsSBmalins He9i"ra'9 Endi"e
9-0 EV1t~t~~A~r~doc RevlseQ: D~D~Ot,
.Y1VS~Garha.dlt~uQlGb.~+rd17'PCN~k°fkilat~eulPa~t~] 7L~~
MAR-16-2008 01:27PIA F110Ik10SCUTAR DYSTROPHY +5093253902 T-452 P.012/01I F-138
~ _
g~~ ~ir~t PermR APPl~cadon
0 pESCRlpTIpN OF FLQATS {iNCi.UDE SIZE ANO NUMBER): ,
OF MARCHlNG UNITS, BAr1DS (INCUIOE SIZE AND NUMBER) AND VEHtCLES:
DESCRtPTIOSV
N-IA
DESCRIPTION OF SOUND AMPLIFIERS:
. , • ,
t,. _z• • _
oTHER PERTiNENT tNFORMATtON -{PLEAsE arracH oraGRaM.siF~CESSARVII=
.
INpEMN1TY - PERFORMANCE BQND ~o~ o~sloned by ~e~itY of suct~
The City Clerk will determine if performance bond is tequ'meci. Such bond maY
organized event and include easts reasQnabty anticipated in removing litter•
~ 7he appl'ccant aprces xhat in the event the germit is granbed, the fallawing tndertlnlhl a9rearrient applies to me evant.
(Contrdcivr, Permitfec, le.ssee. olhor party) assumes the ftk of a11 damage, loss oost and expenseccand rue ~~oer be sustained
lndemnify and hold hrarmtess tf~e Ciry of Tacoma trom and a9ainst any and aD 6ablllry wi~ict► maY
try the City of Tacoma on aeoovnt of any ctaim, suit or adion made or brought agatnst the Gity vP Tacortt3 torthe de~ of
or iNury tn persens or destructlon of pt'4pertY Involving (cantrvdor, p~~~~ lessEe, other patty) snd its employees
sustained in connectian with the perfomianca o4 the (lea9e, purchase acder, contf8 P ~n, ~•"~inW~e sc~ope o~t thei 6ea)
excepR the 9ole ne9l9ence and ~a~iful misconduct of lhe City of Tacams, it~ ef'~plaY 9
employntent, and such indemnification 6ha1T eatend tp and.induds attomey'S fees and tfie cost of e5tablishing the right ta
indemnificaVon hereunder in favor of ihe C'ity ofTacoma. .
lN9URANCE ~
A Camprehensive General Liabillry insurance pfllicY Wi11 be requtmd whic' names the City of TaCVma as an addltional
insured 3s rn.spaMS ac,tivities in cannecction wfth V1ts permit and sueh insurancE as is caRied bY the PE iIiz~~ W n
ordt
(in place of arry insuranco which maY be carried bY the City of 7aCOma), and the pol~Y st1aD cot~taln apP p 9•
This Insurance shg{I eontain a°Crose Ltability" endarsement which reads &ttbstantiaqy as foilow5: The (nctu&ian of More
Thhn Orte Icmurad undef M Poricy she11 not affect the rights of any/ Insured 8s feSPecs anY cfaim, suit ar)udgerrient '
made or binught by or for any ozflet InsureQ or by or for SnY emPlQPYee of any °ftr irvsyred" Thio potlcy shAil protect eech
insured in tPte same manner 8S though a separeto po1lLY nad been t3sued to each oxcept tttpt nothing flerein shail operato bom to lncrease the campanY% Rability boYond me amount or 2mount9 for wiacfi ttie insurer wou1d00 a00 b of t~e ~~n fe~
one fttisured been named. ''he insu~ncs m4vired herein wlll be pn ameupt ►wt less that $1,0one incidant and far irlluries sustalne:d by mere ttiat ane Person in one inoident, pendin9 on U1e event. and fOr propertY
damage m one incidenL . .
q temporacy stteet ciosure permR wi11 r:quire fiabirdy itti5utanae in the minimum amsunt of S1,000,004, WhSoh poliay shall
y be
11aTr. I11c Giry of TE7=ma as an EiOQISlonat insurad thcfC¢n 8nd 9?1811 bE IT1 tarm and in avch additional aMOUr+t m=r
deemed neeassaN ta provide in5ufanoe covemge fbr pn'~~l risk as rnay ba OeVrmined and prescxibed by the City's
~ Insuranc0 Risk MlanaBer. The insu~m reqWruments noreln a►e noi applicab[e Go a rtetghbarhood blOCk Pa mflEVdh
aotivity tfl be•oartducLed withfn a nnn-aReriai sb~eet. is not excesding eae city block, Es in an area residentia ~006
GcnSvt~O'awPU~a•9ppllcorEoaQ~~
I~l4~-~6-~006 O~:FFP~ FRQ1kMUSCULhR kYSTIOPNY +5093253902 T-452 P.O11f012 F-188
spe~a~ uvwtt pem* AP'Pttdon
event i,, sponsared bY 1he Cwners Gr rmjdert~ if s Qroperb! 111rantir19 upon sur.h area. is nvt for Q2m=nziaI or ad"12r1iis1ag
and 1f no sqles of any b04 or araaewM be inade anb no pwmerit ibrzdrrissraA te suO11 Ovent $ ta
purposes orior PrQfit,
b6 mad,~ gr sualcitsd- ,
10~9 w~th ne.~e~r~ ~nd~~~#s , ~ha~S De ~~~d ~th
The ever~t ar9a~+r~~ curr~rg efertive ir~+ranGe policy, or capy►~ a
.
the Gity Cler}c -at least 30 calgndar days bePore the Spe601 eve~~
DrEPA~MOTAL Q1.~~~OKs= . Yas Nio ihio vvent in+mlve a ctzrge fior admisrzion? _
r)aes ~ra al,,ent krnr~~a the sa[t vr me of atrzholic bevereges?
G A Wi11 Rerns or senrlces be so1d ur gsven tlvway at lhe event7 YES. piense deseribe; '
p I& ooV, whls M*mt imrolwe enb**merV If lrE's, please descrba: •
'
aOeS i}]Is eVehf 4nYOlva a mQ+ri11~ ~usita'of ariy lt atcnQ metE~ sidsmQlks or hlghways? Sf YES. attOcft
a 4atafiled map raf y our propma rauW, lndir+ate #ne dira6on of dm++el, ajid p rpuWE a "tten narratNo x0
- wWlain yoLir r0utr!-
~ DGes thi~i evara Tnvolve a mWng t1a-aC'
tnls everrt ho1ve animais7
~ a Does "5 went #nvo4ue aifixad vonue s-its7 lf YES, atkach sdet'aiied so map sriowing a~ ~Wts
~d.
~ ~ ~oies this event irnm1+e a p1a11 f0r a terft7 -
Wll ihere be 10 pen 1Wme CGOkfltg in booths of imiRerr'7
L~ J~ V1% there pe a
p ~ wln Uque'fad Petraii-14m Gm CL$. Prapne} be. useC7
p V- Wi€I ti'4ere be any te rnporaty atvct~mt wip'ig used? q OL 1NlI #hmre be a rteed #or additionak Lftr CamSWnerv ~~~t~
pnes this event im+4lve S~arrgin9 a aann~r:~ ~l1~' ~i 1t ~ic~g Dr► ~ ~ .
l D~ irt ct ~°'rt"i~~~~- "~'r..+r5s1■ n i L 1]~ ~
orgen#~rs must be ~i+ #ru-~k al1 ev~ a~i+~ities mpl~ vAth the Iora! laws aPPricabf a to nolsc a4iftment p lease b$
advgsed thiat 1aud and unwmlmbl2 flolse pitioludirg friUOicJ is a Yiclation of f.`hagWr 8.92060 FaT#he 7amma ZUlunla[pal
Code. A ROIiCe oIiO~C Moy determine tri-ak nat5e during your enen# ts erftm►we 4o a#heFs a n0 may ieQu1re Y~u ta wmp the
rtoise. A1so . Ih Ei Pnlioe may order mLSiCaZ en0ertainment to coase ba=usa it may 1ncite a crowd tio Rmme un ruly and
risks !ryu
l undemtond #imt 1 mus# supp~7r Me CMV VA wft Prapf of iCzUmm (and lh7$ninfij bond, ff Mq1iOd) wO Vie M0n
pefmit appfmatior't fee. in aaardance Mth #1m reqwmments, befare at~taininq the peml _
I am aW918 ex the tarfns and vondMans af the pertnfFt ar}d wAIl edrrise th$ PmrficT" ;n M event a# these terms and
acr~dftion~
r 7-47- 0 7 - - -
~~e 5~iglrat~~u~#~ppl~os~t
1
I~
6krnSl~r~ai ~~aaF
I
( ( ~ ~I;; ~.n ic~ ~i~;t ._r'.~~{9ir .1°(i .1='i-~i' -7: f
'u~j J:~---~t.l::~ J, ..i - ~ ;3• 3 j . ..,`}:i L~l 1i...i~~~i`~ /}.}.,,.lJi~~v,~~ ..~i~~t~_.~~~~t s.~:..%oi~C~:~J:lj•~i!'-.r:;
• .r. . 7 Ii~l~^\i"\~~• ~ '1'~'~!r~-t`~.7~5'~•i.
~jT~..~ts; o~ • ~i ~i 1 i ~r 'i. i ~ -_:.~r ' s -r- -t ~~i r.r ~a ~ C ~ r z17:~ '
::i~~'_ 1~•:~.j~.:..`~: -e .~'~.~5:: ~~,:'l.~t:h~s~;^~f..l L~~~~ ~,J." % \ l _~i S f tiii3,. / ~}r ~v.' .~i~~.,,,✓,. i 9i.;V~,l~t:,_ i.
:e.: ~ 'S:^ ` . A....,.~ 1~--~. .~..2-... .L~~.~.:...:~~.•% ,i.\!. r:.1~:..:,, .~~`,~~~.i,_.. c
•J~' E;:.~ ~ ~ ~ ` {G
,
ATL,
ST
, , t ~c l~~ "r,'"':,--:[
. ~ ^L yr` ' _r,r°i
3.i~,i rx~ ,.,h ,~F.~x ~ ~ti, ~t;f
'~+~t~~i~[,: ' ~t-~ F i
~tvV. S ~~~1'~ I
~ 41\ ~ " ~•'r
, ' • r': ;
~ ``.~1{~ ~N. r J • , `
T3'HLREAS, members of the Intemational Association of Fire Fighters servc and
protect communities t}voughout America every day; and ' ~
WHERF.~4S, with theu passion for service and their selfless acts in the line of
duty, fire fighters have become a syiuhol of national pride, honor, and strength; and
.
tVHERS, members of the Internationa! Association of Fire Fighters ~
. •d .
unselfishly donaie lheir tirne and energy to supporting the battle against muscular
dystrophy; and r=~
WHEREAS, the Internadonal Association of Fire Fighters celcbrates over 50
er Af services and research offereci by the Muscular
a~"l.•~`~~ ears as the preeminent support
Y
Dystrophy Association;
NOW, THEREF4RE, I, Christi.ne 0. Gregoue, Crovernor af the state of
Washington, do hereby proclaim July and August 2007 as
Fire Fighter Appreciatiat Months
~~•htii ~ I iY
i~ i in Washington State, and I urge all citizens to join me in recognizing our state's
firefi$hters for their braverY and comPassion.
Td
Signed this 23 day of April, 2007
i 11, ~ i ~ ~ •I ~ ~ ~ ~i.~,-7'~i
~ • r~`
'•:~f C
Governor Christine O.' Joire
~ ~ F\ni
.f )r~ li
~ a~: C-~ ~ c` . srr ~
c i
r~, lc I. ~ it
'-';,i:=; •
~ ~!~`!GW-.r~t:'>~:~~'~'r~1.~~i 'f~'~~i:i.?xti '1 R:~CI~f:{.~ i ':~:-\'ii1'!'~'~%1'r ''i:?~iT.ti?~':?\ F1-r. ti:T'iN'~I:~" :/>~ti ~:r i~~Y."~ti,~:,.ii
~.i~.l' .:~Lt.. 1 1• ~~r~~'1`, t~-~ 1~'rl•fi t ~ ! : ~ 1•~: l:-l.:('~:tti~,~.~'~ 1.l 1•.~. ~,q G ~ 'y:i~_„~~~r_.,. - .!~•~f ~~f 5~~. .f~ ! lt:~ -
, 1 .1.i I f - - - - - - 1•~i i. ,n - - -_r 1 i u
r~ iTi~'~ •~1' :.~1 r ' r _ ~~\~'i :7'~:.' :51'~':~ d•~ '~rJ-• ~ - "i-:~ S'` ~r;`i'rI'~'r,--.Y:'Y'tti
.7~•. r.G~l^~,'}:~i.}•~•~li~t~~l'~~. h\ .,,'"f!~ .i. ~ ~i/ Ii %.1'- ' /.l! /91~r~ 1\ C.,1 '•~r•
• . ~'r~•'i 1.~~,' ^l~,i?_1'i.. i i~'I`ct.i,•i r,(l,i i.~a v~t r:~ 1ac~ilZ.'i''is'F ~rl~oi i_.~j:.:~."~ .t ~~f 1_ r•'f Srr: e~ ti~ ti..C:_?ll,.~
Fixing A Confusinp Law
Also in California, IAFF and MDA had another
important Fill-the-Boot connection last year, and this
one likely will have positive consequences for Fill-the-
Boot campaigns across the country.
c+
Lou Paulson, president of the Califomia Professional
Firefighters (CPF), worked closely with MDA staff to
remedy a problem that had cropped up in a few
~California municipalities.
~Californla state laws were ambiguous about the
c circumstances under which fire fighters could collect
" from the public. Some municipalities chose to
interpret the regulations in ways that unnecessarily
restn:_ted ~ ~II-th:,-~:,ot cvcrr,;.
~
'he IAFF h1DA terrn v:crkc:l thc state I~Gisl~:ture
and ultimately won passage of California State Bill
- 582, which specifically affirms fire fighters' rights as
charity vL-A~mCCr,- tu cngage in charitable solicitations on public roadways, as long as they've
filed an application with the appropriate local authority and have liablllty insurance.
The legislation is relatively simple and iYs hoped it can serve as a model in other states and
municipalities avhere laws governing Fill-the-Boot activities may be hazy.
IAFF is MDA's single largest organizational sponsor (more than $25 million in 2007), dnd the
logic of the two groups' partnership has been plain for more than 50 years. From the Atlantic
to the Pacific, people from all walks of Ilfe are coping with devastating neuromuscular
diseases, and fire fighters and their families are among them.
The difFerence is that fire fighters, as a brotherhood, and through their Fill-the-Boot efforts,
have a special opportunity to capitalize on their numbers and wield their unity to create a
matchless force for good works.
i
r ,
~
i R
1. VS1 r M
~Y
v
~r
Standming Together
The IAFF has stood firm for more than 50 years
in the fight against muscular dystrophy - supportfng
MDA research, services and educaton.
Thanks, fire fighters, for standing tall for "Jerry's kids:"
~ i ;.~i.;_ i,...,.. K,;~•.
4A
~
/
Dedicated Soles
0
f ~ f~l~, ~ _ -
..-~f
1
Fire fighters have filled the boot for MDA for more than
50 years - supporting MDA research, services and
education in the fight against muscular dystrophy.
Thanks, flre fighters, for your soulful commitrnent
~
~ ~f.'14• !tl. . t'.il.'~
. • :.e ~
. CITYOF SPOKANE :
~ . s . . . . . : . .
Pm ma AA sPOl~U*I%I4E . 1'"'' . . . -
. 11 11 111 1 ~ ^ _
~l>>>111
Spokane is a city that celebrates special evenfs. From maJar conventrons and infernaironal sports
events to community based festlvals, parades, athletic activitfes, ihe City ol Spokane Fs proud to host
hundrads of events each year. . .
The fo!lawing pages include ihs City of Spokane's Special Events Aermit Application and instructions _
developed to gulde you through the permit process.
ttr you camplete the Permrt Applicafron please retum it to the City of Spokane. A representative
~n the City will con(aCt you upon receipt ot the applicatlon and thereafter ►vi!! serve as your primary
c;7to ct for the processing ot your pe: mif. This person wil1 distribute copies of your application to a!! City departments aNected by your event.
You wi!l be cantacted rndividua!!y by these deparfinenis only if they have speciFc questions or
concerns about your event. While City deparfinents have joined fogether to make this application
pmcess simple and complete, you may have to coniact federal, state or county agencies in addition to
the City of Spokane. '
f•
ThanF;-you for contributing to the splrit and vitality of our Crty fhrough the stagrng of your event. Best
wishes for a successfu/ event!
I R vi fi2bD_j . ' . .
~ Dele-0e9:i
~ \ % •
. ~ '
. • . .
~
F . + # roll.
_ - cTlOhl . .
. leled 2pplic*tion may be filed as early as ninely (90) days before Ihe evont, bul must be received rra
.,ian thirly {34} days be#ore the ackual evenl dale, the City o# Spol4ane S pecial Events Paaicy (CPR 91-
provides the frarnewaork ar~d guidar~ce fflr issuance ❑f Speci2l Evenl Perrnits In~the'Ciky, - an g~neral, any ~
ganized actiwity Involving khe use of. ar haaing impacl upan, Rublfc property. facili#ies, Rublic parks. sidewalks
,,r street areas require a pErrnit. _ _ _ . oe~eeee_ a . . , . _
PkOCEDURI-z
The pemlit applic8tion process begins whert you s+xGmik a compleled 5pacial Evenf Perrnik Applic-ation. Keep
in mind tha[ acceplance af your applitaftn is not #o be construed as Gnal apprDval or confirrnation of yrour
request_ The Ciky has Irais❑n statf, in the Parfcs and Ftecireation Department, the Fire 13eparlrnenI and in #ha
Po9ice Department lo help guide you Ihrough the petmit process. Copies of Ihe applicaii4n are forwardod to , .
and reviawed by all affecRed deparlments. During the raview process. You may be nofiSed if your event
requires 2ny ;idditianA iniarrnatian. Rermils, iIcenses or oeriificates af in5iurance_ These ilems musk bp,
~ receivad hefore your permi# can he approved. In many cases, Special Event Perrnits are approved anly e few
; days befnee Ihe event. All Special Evenls are approved an a firsl came. first served basis. Your perrnii may .
nok be approved if h conflic[s with anoiher already approved Special Event_ .
YDUR RESPOM$ESILIT1ES
Yaur main responsibiliiy is ta cammunitake clearly wikh C Ity skaff and to work wilh ihe City kn rrEziking your evenl
the best 2n¢ saPest ii c.an be.
Normakly. C ity sk2ff amd equiprnen[ cannok be used to sLippoil 2 Speciai Event, Evenk sponsors are
respanskble for #ratfic and trowvd control or far paying #oe extra supporl from the Fire andlor PoCite Dep2rtrnents
or for priva te security_ li you r evenl is ta be neld in 2City Paik, sorne special Parks an d Recreslion
OepartrrEenk n,[es, regula!ions, fees, deiaosils and restiriciians rnaY aPPlY- Generally. Park areas cannok be
reserved for exclusive use o# ane group and 2ccess to lhe area by Uhe generaj publ[c musk be 2!vailaGli3 2k 211
kirnss. "
It is your responsibillky lo comply vrith aII Cifi{, County, 9tate and Federal Disabiliky A[tess Requirerrreri[s, AI! _
indoor 8nd outdpor sites far SpeGial EventS must be 2CCes2ibla to persbns V.'flh di52bilffies_ Gf a porkk0ii of 1he
area is inaccessible, an 21LernatO area rr~usi be provided wikh Ute s2rne activities thaR are in !he ina=essible
areas. Disabled access rnay inr-lude parkino, restrooms, telephones, clear paths of It2vel, iransportation,
2cC2SSibls vendars and bookhs.
The Spok2ne ReaionaE Hea lih DiSkiiCt recarrtrnends one (1) chemical toflek ioY eVery 250 people, or porkipn
ther& of_ Yau musk properly dispose oE kvaste 2nd garbage iltrovghouk ihe kerrn af your event and immeaiateiy
uporr conclusion oi th e ever+i the area rnus# be reCurned to a clean canditian_ You can sel 2 standaid by
leaving the area better Ihan you Found ik, I# you fail Eo perforrn adeqvai2 deanrup, or damage occurs to Ciky
propcrty, you will be bined al fuli cosi recavery rakes plus avarhead for olegi n-up and re pair_ In addition, 9uCn
failure may resull in deni2l of a fuiure Speciz) l Event Perrrrit ar khe requirement af a cash bond or surety band
forfuture events_
SpeCial Events thak are impsGiing downtown artd Ihe dotiwn#atiVn streeks need ko Conta G# ahe 0 owntOwn
Partnership al (509) 456-0580 and nDGfy them, OpErattng Commi#t"s vf the major events should incleide a
represenk2tive of the DTF.
I
fi
, . . _ . . .a.....-...y'7:T52T•_ _ . : . ✓ ..I
'J .
. .,.j' .
~K~ik?\ • , .
i.
f• ' •
SPECIAL EVENTS IN CITY PARKS INVOLVING COMMERCIAL *
,~,CTIVITIES VENDORS, FUND RAISING, EXCEPTIONS - TO PARK
RULES AND POLICIES, SPECIAL SUPPORT FROM THE PARK
DEPARTMENT OR OTHER UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRE
( PARK BOARD APPROVAL.
THE SPOKANE PARK BOARD MEETS ONLY ONCE PER MONTH. '
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS REQUIRING PARK BOARD .
REVIEW AND APPROVRL COULD TAKE AS LONG AS THIRTY (30) •
DAYS TO GET ON A MEETING AGENDA AND BE PROCESSED.
THE PARK DEPARTMENT REQUESTS THAT YOU CALL OUR OFFICE
(509) 363-5455 AND RECEIVE A BLANK APPLICATION FOR EACH
EVENT. THE SPECIAL EVENT PERPv11T PROCESS IS REVIEWED ,
PERIODICALLY AND REQUIREMENTS DO CHANGE. PLEASE DON'T ASSUME THIS FORM WILL BE THE SAME YEAR AFTER YEAR. WE WILL BE HAPPY TO SEND YOU AN UPDATED APPLICATION AS EARLY
~ NINETY (90) DAYS BEFORE THE EVENT.
DEPOSIT: (Returnable after repori of No Harm)
$250.00 deposit for 200 people or more total attendance
$ 50.00 deposit for less fhan 200 people total attendance
• _ . _ . _ . . ~ Deposit due upon verbal approva) of event, p3yeble lo CITY OF SPOKEINEEVENT • oeletee:t
I N FORMATI ON '-""""'Pb;e Break-------
Type of Event;
❑ RUn' ❑ WALK ❑ BIKe TOUR ❑ BIKE RACE CIPARADE
❑ FAlR [I CONCER7 ❑ OTHER (apesify):
EVENT TITLE_
EVENT QATE{S};_! TOTA1 ANTICIPATED ATTENDANCE:
/
~ . . , -
. ='..:r_ - =.r....-~-. - - . . - , - . -
- ~ . ~
AREA: ' . . . -
3 OF EVEIJ'i':DA - ~ AMM~ ' .
~
, UP TIMES:PM - ADdlP?A TAKE OdWN TIMES:' AhUPht AMl~Ab.~
j£ SPECIFIGALLY YOUR SET UP WOR]C:
MY STREET(S) REQUIRINC~ CIOSURE. INCLUDE STREET NAPAE(% DATE AFtD TIME OF CLQSING AND TIPAE OF
iREPlINt3: • ~ . • AN M • 01 L114,103 rMircle ' !l N M'A I M OR', I 161."Aly1filk i [O
SPONSORING ORG ' ZATION: _La .
52,24 I .
APi~'LIGAN7 n"AA~~~~ i'~~1: ~J~~I7 77 1 BUSINESS PHONE•.() vU
ADQReSS: aP: ~;~Y% ~
DAYTIME PFtON.E L274 Z EVE. PHONE:(,~) FAX,".:c
GOMTACT PERSOh'ON SITE" pAY OF EVEM: " PAGERlCELLULAR:
'
QVERALL EVENT DESCRIPTIONIROUTE MAPISITE DIA - A
Please proMe a DETACLED DESCRfPTION ot yovr ovent. IndudC def8iis regard3ng use of vehides, anlmais, rides ar arvy other
perGnent inf amia@on about the,event r
r ~
; i) l_~~-._~.-~~~;• ~t~~ ~-t` + ~l & %~'~%f
i 77 L! c
~1?[~r1 lL: r .~7 !;'1.'.-, ~.T j~l~~f~ L-'
% al%i,4-?' 1 A, il,C'~
lL~-'~~~~i ,UL41~11 % ~ i ~~G4• % ~ .~1j.~i ~,.GC:1~~ .
1\
CITY OF SPOKME SPECIAL EVENTS PERAAIT PAGE 1 OF 1
NO YES
[31 ❑ DOE$ TiilS EVENT INVOLVE TFiE SALE OR USE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGEST IF 30, YOU D.1UST
CONTACT THE 6'JASHINGTON STATE UQUOR CONTRQL BOARD (509) 625•5513 AND THE SPECIAL
FOLICE PROBLEMS DIVISION (509) 625-4088.
❑ WItL ITET.IS OR SERViCES BE SQtD AT THIS EVEN77 IF YES, PLEAS£ OESCFcIBE: '
A CITY BUSINESS LICENSE MAY BE REQUIRED.
/
. /
. ,
-jES TMIS EVENT INVaLVE A MOVING ROUTE OF ANY KIND ALOPJG STREETS, SIDEWAIKS 0R HIGH- '
• NAYS? lF VES, ATTACH ADETAILED haAP OF YOUR PROPO$ED ROUTE, INDICATE DIRECTION OF
TRAVEL, AND PROVIDE A WRITTEN NARRATNE TO EXPLAIN YOUR ROUTE.
1 DOES TF[IS EVENT INVOLVIE A FlXEO VENUE SITE? IF YES, ATTACH A DETAlLED SITE MAP SH01JV-
ING ALL STREETS IMPACTED BY THE EYENT. •
0 ; flOPl TO 7HE ROUTE MAP REQUIRED ABOVE,'PLEASE A7TACH A DIAGRAM SH04'VING THE OVERALL LAY-OUT AND '
P LdCATIpNS FOR THE FOLLOWiNG ITEMS: (CHECK ITEMS USING)
ALCOHQLIC GONCESStON ANDbR BEER GARDEP! AREAS
j FOOD CONCESSiOdd' ANalOR FOOD PREPARATION AREAS QF YOU 17JTEN0 TO COOK FOOD IN THE EVENT AREA,
FIEASE SPECIFY METHOD: GAS ELECTRIC GHARCOAL _OTHER specify ~
❑ PORTABLE fWaJOR AERAQANENT TOILET FAClUTIES
❑ FIRST AID FAGILITIES AND AA46ULAnCE LOC,ATIONS
❑ TABLES AND CHAIRS
Q FENGNG, BARRIERS ANDIQR SA.RRICADES
❑ GENERATOR LOGAYIdNS ANDfOR SOURCE OF ELECTRICITY
❑ CANOPIES UR TENT LOGATtONS
BOOTHS, EXHIEJTS, DISPLAYS OR ENCLOSURES
❑ SCAFFOLDIRG, BIEACJiERS, PLATFORIA$, STAGES, GRAHDSTANDS Oi2 RELSTED STRUCTURES ❑ VEHICLES APJDlOR TRAIIERS "
❑ TRASH CONTAI'ERS AND DUMPSTERS ' •
DESCRIEE YOUR PLAN FOR CLEAH-UA AND REASOVAL OF VJASTE AND GARBAGE DURING AND AFTER THE EVENT:
r-
• ACCESSIBILITY
PLERSE DESCRIBE YOUR PROCEDURES FOR BO7H CROWD GOPI7ROL AND INTERNAL SECURITY:
St, f .r .i ~.L L~ C.•i e
?LEkSE DHSCRIBE YOUR FIRST-RiDJA4E0tCRL PIA,N. HOW h1ANY FIRST-AID STATIONS AND WHERE ARE THEY LOCATEO
P.LONG THE RaUTE? HOW 4'JILL THEY 8E STAFFED?:
r
77 T
/f x
PLERSE DESCRIBE•YOUR ACCESSIBILfTY PIAN FOR ACCESS AT YOUR EVENT FOR tNDIViDU,o,LS WRH DISA$tLil'IES:
~ YES '
ijJ ❑ HAVE YOU HIRED ANY PROFESSIONAL SECURITY ORGkNIZATION TO MA'DLE SECURlTY ARRANGE-
MEPITS FOR 7MIS EVENT? IF YES, PLEASE STATE:
SECURITY ORGAtJIZATION: PHONEM
ADDRESS:
SEGURfTY DIRECTOR P1P.AiE: '
, CI7Y OF SPOKANE SPECIAL EVENTS PERt.11T PAGE 2 OF S
❑ IS THIS A NIGHT EVEKT? IF YES, PLEASE S7ATE HOtiN THE EVEfV'T AND SURi2bllNDING AREA '
WIIL BE ILLUMIAIA7ED 70 ENSURE SAFETY OF THE PARTICIPANTS AND
SPEG7ATORS:
!
i
w1~ '.rn _ i_.......... . • _ ' . .
• 471-1- AQJdISSION 8£ CHARGED?
AR£ THERE ANY MUSUCAL ENTERTAIN'MENT FEATURES RELATED TO YQUR EVENT? IF YES, RLEASE
STATE THE NUMBER OF STAGES, N'UMSER OF BANDS AND TYPE OP OdUSIC. .
' ~UMBER OF STAGES: NUTAEER OF BANDS: ~
TYi'E OF MUSIC:
❑ WILL SOUND AhIPUFICATION 8E USED? IF YES, PLEASE INDtGATE START TIME: APAlPM -
FIPJISH TUAE: AhflPM. '
' PLEASE aESCR[BE TJiE SOUNO EQUIPMENT THAT WILL BE USED FOR YOUR Ei/ENT: ~ ❑ Ak'Y IPIFLATABLE DtiVICES OR HOT fUR BALLOONS? IF YES, PLEASE D£SGRIBE:
O/ ❑ AiJY FIRE41'OR)CS, ROGKETS OR OTHER PYROTECNNICSI IF YES, PLEASE QESCRIBE:
Pf ❑ ANY SIGNS, BAN'NERS, DECORATIONS, SPECIAL LIC,HTIMG? IF YES, PLEASE
DESCRIBE:
r^
.
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
IM lAOST CASES. EVIDENCE aF INSURAPICF 4VILL BE REQUIRED $EFORE F1MAL PERA4fT APPROVAL PLEIISE PROVIDE A
CERTIFICA7E OF INSURA~'CE VVHICFf SH04VS $1 P.OILUON IN CO~AMEi2C1Al GEiJERAt l.IA61LITY INSURANCE AND A POIICYr_ %C~~~ ~
ENOORSEDAEKT WHICH NAh1E5 THE ClTY OF SPOKANE AS ADDITIONAL INSUREO. SOME EVENTS MAY REQUIRE A /
IiIGHER LIMIT OF INSURANCE_ ERCH EVENT IS EVALUHTED ON ITS RISK EXPQSU2E. THE CITY ALSO OfF€RS A
PROGRAAd FOR SPECIqL EVEN7S INSURANCE WKICH Al.LOWS SP07JSORS TO ?URCHASE SPECIAI EVENT IKSURANCE. C,ALL RISlC h1ANAGEN,ENT AT 625-8222.
.~1.C,~ ~-J i s` ~ 1?',
• D AFFIDAVIT O APPLICANT.
I CER71: Y THAT THE 1NFdRMATlON CONTAIkED IN THIS APFUGITIOM IS TRUE Afr'D CORRECT TO THE BEST OF l,fY
KH0WLEDG£ kND BEUEF, T3-IAT I HAVE R,£AD, UNDERS7AN0 ANO AGREE 70 ABIDE 6Y THE RULES I',ND REGULATIONS
CsOVERNING TiNE PROROSED SPEdAL EVENT UNDER THE SPO!(ANE MUNICIPAL CODE AND CITY COUkGL PbLICY. I .l
AGREE TO ABIDE BY TNESE RULES, AND FURTHER CERTIFY 7H,NT I, ON BcHAI.F QF THE SPONSOR, AM ALSO • 1
AUTMORJZED TO COAIJd1T THE SPOVSOR, AND 7HEREFORE AGREE TO BE FINANCIALLY RESPQNSIBLE FOR ANY CQST ~AN0 FEES TNA7 P.1AY BE l'CURRED BY 092 ON BEHALF OF THE EVENT TO 7HE CITY OF SPOKAPIE.
I AGREE, ON 8EI-tALF OP THE SPONSOR, TO DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARldLESS THE CITY OF SPOKANE, I7S
QEPARTDdENTS, £hSPLOYEES, AGEMS, OFFICERS ArlD VOLUNTEERS FROPA ANY AND ALL LIA8ILITY IN ANY AND ALL
OdAT7ERS CONCERNING 7NIS SPEGIA4.'EVENT.
NnME OF AFPUCANT:
(print) f /SIGNATURE• DATE:
ONLY RETURN EVENT INFORh1ATION PAGES 1. 2 8 3 ANP PERMIT WHEN APpLY1NG FOR PERMIT
CITY OF SPO9CAAlE S?ECIAI. EVENT$ PERMI7 PAGE ] OF 3
~
~
/
A(;~RM CEfi 1IFICJ''iL 1E OF LIJ"1BIL1 1 1 INSL~~NCEIQ: N7QA unrequvlxourrr 9l6W
RRQDUCER THI9 CERTIF1CATE IS I 55UED AS A CAATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND COHFERS NO R1G#iTS UPQN THE GERTIFIC#7E
international Nlilne of Arizona F]OLDE R. THIS CER7IFICATE dOF-B NOT M7END, EVEN a oR
OEaSt C~I2FidaIE AVEf1Ue AlTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLCCCE$ BELOW.
~~rienix, AZ 85020-5505 iN sU RERs nFFORairac cav~- !LcE . I~Phane: 802-395-9111 Fax: 802-371-4264 INsuRF-a: irrsuRr=r k Phil2delphia lndemnity fnsurancu Campany
Nluscuaar Dystraph}r Associatian, in c. I NsuRF; R s: 3300 East Sunrise Drive I risuFZEac!
Tucson, AZ 85718 1 r+suRr;R a: - '
. INSUFER E:
COVERACES .
7WE POLICIES Cf INSURANCEllSTED 9ELOLV HAIfE BEEN ISSUEDTQ TFiE IN3llliE0 7iAhA-1-0 ABOVE FOR THE POUGti`PEAlOE] INOLCA'TE0_ NO7Y1iTHSTANUrNG
p.x'F REQUIREA+,2N7,TEiLy~ OR C41%16QT14N OF nNY CaxwCT 0R O7HER OOCWAEh+T wRx REsPECT TO'NHICH 7m5 GER7IFICATE N,AY BE IsSUEO OR '
nuv PexrfaN, rnE ursuRA~'~GE oFraROtb 9Y TFE POLIC[ES ntscA[eeo r[EREirv [s SM-ECTTOALL7H; iERNS, EXIM-usioras.AA,0 COxCYfIONS 0F Sl7CH
POLICiES, AGGF4GATE L1M1TS SxOwN "Y HAVE eEEU REDl7GEd BY CLqh4S Ppl0. '
~usR 7YPE QF INSURFNGE PO~ICY NUM9ER POLICY EFFEtTT.'E Pb11GY E?CPI~ITION UI!41T5
ti+~k bAtiE Mr~UOa'rY QATE uL,voan"~~}
A {32NE]i.4L LIABILITf PFCP}C224547 04101107 04101108 EwcyocauRFLENce s ~AOO,ouo,
x CDU]A@RCwI GAMEP.A1 LIhUILIT' FIRIE; 0.81.55EE (.My ora Ikr]
CCAlk1-A d~I OGCUR MFAE}T(~a(+p0gumf 6 75,4p]. ~
_7 ;
1~J
- pER59KA dAf}YINJL!R5' S 7UOU~.
GENERALaCGRECxiE s z,eao-,aoo-_, GE3J'LAG6REGATELIPdITAPPLI-~SPEF= PpCCUC7g-qGadaloa,w13
'FOLICY I I P~ X LOG - ,
AU70MOBILE LIA9ILRY 44ki&uEp $Wa49 Lui7 9 I
4E8 ecc+7~~]
IA1T0 ~
pA.L OX'lkEP AL1T4S b76iOr iNJURY s ,
1
i
SCHE4~JLEO:.~JTOS HIAZpkUiQ$ 2001LYIK3LIRY $
~ IPuocddanl)
NQN-0YdNEO dU74S
- PF2dPERTF flPJ.1AGE #
(Per aetident}
pRJIGELIl1BI!ITY +~urocw;r-e+~nccit€nT i
ANYAlff6 o7HER7ww EarCC
14LT40HLY
xcCt
EkC;$$CIR9ILf[T EprIApCCURFlEuLE ~
culrnS&LwE L I 1 OCCUR ' aC41REPkse L
~
dE6lfCT1EVLE
RE7EM10N
WORI(ERS CMi?EJ45A 7q AN w~ *r,aTU or~
TORYL~Tu
EMPILO1ER$ LLAtILIlrY E.L E40H A6CIDEFJ'7 $
@.L619EfSE-EAEMPL4ti'EE $
e.L. owemml -muc Mi 5
877{2R
OEBCRJP'TIOOOr' OPEi+.4710N"uILGGATrON5NEWI{y.EVE3{CLU310k3 A6dE0 BY NdORSF:. LENT~SPECIAL PRpVI$Ip}!S
Thg Cerlfflcate Holder is added as addlE[onal Insured as respet#S #he3r Inlerasi In ihL- Sp4kanc Cify Flll the Baotfr} taki ng pIa Ce 9eptember 15,
2407 at varlous 3ntersocilons in Spokane, WA, ~ cAN cEuL:rior, exceariora: lt a,:Y rrorcm PoR Naw p.aY
CEFtTIFICATEHOLdER X anomoreaL INSUAEO;urSURERLET[ER;~ CANCELLATION
8WOL7LD k141' 4F T7iE,490VE dE5Lft19Ed POLGCIES 6E GbNCElLE6 25FOFkE TFLE ENFIFLaiRL4N
J~ f~ dAiE THEREOF, THE ISSU[NG INS~I.~R 4VpLL ENdEAVOFt TO kiW.t '34 ~~`3 4YAITTSN
~
f P NOTICE TO TN~ CER;TaFICA7E kOLDER 70 T}!p, LtiFf, BIJT PkILURF_ TO 110 50 SN,kU,
t Horlh MOnr4e, #320 wsvos e No oeuOr.tior4 OR UAE1u7'r OF ANr VJNo uRarv rwe iNwRER, frs AcEwrs OR
3pokane. WA 99206 REPRESENTATNE5
(509) 836,457$ AUTI'ORIZEd REPRE3E7ffA71VE
ACORa 25-s {7Mr~ . (i~ncoRa coRpaR,a-n oN 1988
I
Applicants meeting GErtain requirements may obtain permits for charitable solicitation in
public streets. The requirements includc the applicant's name and local address, name `and address of lhe charitable organization to receivc funds from the solicitation,
nualifications and prior [insert term here] training to work in public right away, and proof
of liability insurance in the amount of 1,000,000 per occurrcnce naming the counry(s)
and/or city(s) as an additional insured. Solicitation is limited to daylight liours, a specific
time period not to exceed 48 hours, 2 events per year per group, and the funcis donated to
a not-for-profit group qualif ed under section 501(c) of the Internal Revcnue Service.
/
.
~
.
t ,
REQUEST FOR COMMUNITY INPUT I
i
On Septernber 19, 20D6, at 5:30 p,m_, the Tacoma City Council wiCl hold a public heanng to take I
~ testimony rega rding two ordinances [atta ched] to I imi# °pe nhandling" ihat is directe[i at traffic or is
coercive. Cornrrtuni#y knput is needed,
Below are questions, adapted from a2004 Department of Justice publication, the answers to which may ~
assis# C i#y Council members in necessary fac#-f~nding;
Complarrrants and Dorrors
• To what extent does panhanc#ling bo#her or intirnidate?
. Waw would you feel if you were approacheci by a panhanciler near a fwnancial institution, such as an ATM, or leaving a ban6c or credtt union? .
. Have you ever been app roo ched when yo u felt you were tra pped, such as while using a '
pay Phone, or fue lirtg y ou r vehicle or waiting for a bus?
= Harre you ever fel# intimidated into making adonaxion #o apanhandler, such as;
o Being followed af#er#eiling a penharrdler'"no"?
o Being spaken to harshi}r oe cursed or gestured at by a panYrendler?
o Having free passage irnpeded by one or mare panhandlers? o Had a panhandler try #o wesh yaur vuindshield or force a flower or other product vr
service?
Are complaints filed with your organiza#ion (businesslneighborhood associations)?
- V1fho 7are the compla i n a nts? M ercha nts? S h:j pperz, ? 1Nork - - 7 Stud ents?
* Does panhandling alter peopMe's behaviar and routines (e.g., do people avoid cerkain areas or
stores)? • What are the parkicular complaints?
What do cornpEainants suggest should be done to ron#rok panhandling?
• 11Vhat percentage of passersby give rnoney #o panhandlers?
• V1fhy do people say they give money to panhandlers"? Vtilhat da they believe the panhandMers use
.
the money for?
Panharrdlers ' -
+ How many paerhandlers are in the area? How many are regulars? How many are occasional?
• 1NYrat is known about the regular panhandlers? VVhat is their age, race, gender, fam'tly status,
ernpi oyrnent status, and employ rnent history? Are they substance abusers? Do they suffer fro m menta l
illness?
• Do the panhandlers kno+ru abou# and use social services in the area shelters, soup kitchen5,
, job training, sub~tance abuse trea#rrkent}? .
' Locat+anlTirr+e
~ - Where does panhandlkng cornmonly occur? In parks, plazas and squares? On sidewalks? Near
ATM s? EVear public transporiation s#vps a nd stations?
• Have yau ever been delayed in traffic because an occupan# in artother +rehicle has stopped to
make a donation ta apanhandler?
•Have you ever been distracted while driving because of panhandling?
i .Have yau ever felt safety, including thet of tne panhandleT, was jeopardized by panhandling
' directed at occupants af vehicles?
!
Please contact Assistant City Attorney Kirn Gerhardt at 591-5917 or by ernail at -
irn~rkrorrif{rlrE 4=rn.no raro 1142 with yaur comments or concems_
o
Solicitations for immediate employment, goods, services, financial aid or
monetary gifts to the occupants of vehicles on public roadways
distract drivers:
obsfiruct and impede the orderly flow of traffic ,
cause traffic congestion
create traffic and safety hazards that pose a danger to the solicitors
, create traffic and safety hazards that pose a danger to the persons solicited
create traffic and safety hazards that pose a danger to the traveling public in
general
~ .
~
)
~ An Ordinance relating to Title 8 of the Tacoma Municipal Code ("TMC") Public
Safety and Morals repealing section 8.13.030 "Vehicular or pedestrian
interferencep and enactment of two new chapters to Title 8 to be known as TMC
chapter 8.136. "Solicitations to Occupants of Vehicles on Public Roadways
Prohibited" consisting of four sections and TMC chapter 8.13A "Regulation of
Solicitation" consisting of five sections.
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near automated teller machines create a safety hazard and an increased 'potential for criminal activity against persons using the machines, since those
persons are often in isolated locations with cash conspicuously in their
possession, thereby making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by
solicitors; and WHERFAS. the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near entrances and exits of banks, credit unions and other similar financial
~ institutions create a safety hazard and an increased potential for criminal activity
against persons using those institutions, since those persons are often entering
or exiting those institutions with cash conspicuously in their possession, thereby
making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by solicitors; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near exterior public pay phones create a safety hazard and an increased
potential for criminal activity against persons using the telephones since those
persons are often in isolated locations with their attention distracted from their .
surroundings, thereby making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by
solicitors; and
i
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
~ near self-service car washes create a safety hazard and an increased potential
for criminal activity against using persons seff-senrice car washes, since those
~
persons are often in isolated locations with cash conspicuously in their
possession and are usually a captive audienoe, with their attention distracted
from their surroundings as they have vehicles in various stages of cleaning,
thereby making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by solicitors; and '.WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near self-service fuel pumps create a safe"ii he.---rd and an increased potential
for criminal activity against using persons self-service, since those persons are
often in isolated locations w►th cash conspicuously in their possession and are
usually a captive audience, with their attention distracted from their surroundings
as they fill their vehicles with fuel, thereby making them more vulnerable to and -
intimidated by solicitors; and , WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near public transportation stops create a safety hazard and an increased
potential for criminal activity against persons using the public transportation stops
since those persons are usually a captive audience often in isolated locations
with their attention distracted from their surroundings, as they wait and watch for .
necessary transportation, thereby making them more vulnerable to and
intimidated by solicitors; and
WHEREAS, the city council has determined that it is in the best interest of
the public health, safety and welfare to restrict the distances at which solicitations
~ may be conducted near those locations and facilities; and
`~._.J
~ WHEREAS, the city council has determined that solicitations for
immediate employment, goods, services, financial aid or monetary gifts to the
occupants of vehicles on public roadways distract drivers, obstruct and impede
tfie orderly flow of traffic, cause traffic congestion, and create traffic and safety
hazards that pose a danger to the solicitors, the persons solicited and to the traveling public in general, and
WHEREAS„the.city..council~has-determined-that-annual=°Fill'the-BooY' '
campaign, has-well-established protections including but.not limited to an .
individual to monitor every firefighter or volunteer to ensure that no solicitation to
"Fill the.Boot" impedes_the-orderly-flow of-traffie-or causes any tcaffic congestion
or safety. hazards, and O WHEREAS, the city.council has determined that it is in the best interest of
the public health, safety and welfare to prohibit such solicitations to all occupants
of vehicles on public roadways except for the annual uFill the BooY' campaign;
Now, Therefore,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TACOMA:
Section 1. That Title 8, Section 8.13.030 of the Tacoma Municipal Code
Safety and Morals to amended to repeal section 8.13.030 "Vehicular or
pedestrian interference" in its entirety.
Section 2. That Title 8 of the Tacoma Municipal Code Safety and Morals
be amended to enact a new chapter to known as be chapter 8.13A "Regulation of
~ Solicitation" consisting of five sections, and reading as follows:
~ TMC 8.13A.010
REGULATION OF SOLICITATION
DEFINITIONS. In this section: .
(1) AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE means a machine, other than a
telephone:
(A) that is capable of being operated by a customer of a financial
institufiion;
. (B) by which the customer may communicate to the financial
inst'rtution a request to withdraw, deposit, transfer funds, make payment, or
otfierwise conduct financial business for the customer or for another person .
directly from the customer's account or from the customers account under a line of credit previously authorized by the financial institution for the customer; and (C) the use.of which may or may not involve personnel of a financial
institution.
(2) EXTERIOR PUBLIC PAY TELEPHONE means any coin or credit card 'reader telephone that is:
(A) installed or located anywhere on a premises except exclusively in
the interior of a building located on the premises; and
(B) accessible and available for use by members of the general
public.
(3) PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION STOP means an area officially marked and
designated as a place to wait for a bus, a light rail vehicle, or any other public
transportation vehicle that is operated on a scheduled route with passengers
paying fares on an individual basis.
(4) SELF-SERVICE CAR WASH means a structure: (A) at which a vehicle may be manually washed by its owner or .
operator with equipment that is activated by the deposit of money in a coin-
operated machine; and
(B) that is accessible and available for use by members of the
general public. -
(5) SELF-SERVICE FUEL PUMP means a fuel pump:
(A) from'which a vehicle may be manually filled with gasoline or other
fuel directly by its owner or operator, without the aid of an employee or attendant
of the premises at which the fuel pump is located; and
(B) that is accessible and available for use by members of the
general public.
(6) SOLICITATION means to ask, beg, solicit, or plead, whether orally or in a
written or printed manner, forthe-purpose of immediately receiving contributions,
alms, charity, or gifts of items of value for oneseif or another person.
8.13.020. Place of solicitation: SOLICITATION NEAR DESIGNATED
LOCATIONS AND FACILITIES.
(A) A person commits an offense if he conducts any solicitation vvithin 15 feet
~ of:
(1) an automated teller machine;
(2) an entrance or exit of a bank, credit union, or other similar financial
institution;
(3) an exterior public pay telephone; ~__.j
O (4) a self-service car wash;
(5) a self-service fuel pump; or
(6) a public transportation stop.
(B) For purposes of Subsection (A), measurement will be made in a straight
line, without regard to intervening structures or objects, from the nearest point at
~ which a solicitation is being conducted to whichever is applicable of the following:,_
(1) the nearest entrance or exit of a facility in which an automated teller
machine is enclosed or, if the machine is not enclosed in a facility, to the nearest .
part of the automated teller machine;
(2) the nearest entrance or exit of a bank, credit union, or other similar -
financial iristitution;
(3) the nearest part of an exterior public pay telephone;
(4) the nearest part of the structure of a self-service car wash; '(5) the nearest part of a self-service fuel pump; or
(6) the nearest point of any sign or marking designating an area as a
public transportation stop.
8.13A.030
Manner of solicitation.
SOLICITATION BY COERCION
(1) COERCION means:
(A) to approach or speak to a person in such a manner as would
~ cause a reasonable person to believe that the person is being threatened w'rth:
(i) imminent bodily injury; or
(ii) the commission of a criminal act upon the person or another
person, or upon property in the person's immediate possession;
(B) to persist in a solicitation after the person solicited has given a
negative response;
(C) to block, either individually or as part of a group of persons, the
passage of a solicited person;
(p) to engage in conduct that would reasonably be construed as
interoued to compei or force a:- :licited person to accede to demands;
(E) Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person;
(F) Will#ully providing or delivering, or attempting to provide or deliver,
unrequested or unsolicited services or products with a demand or exertion of
pressure for payment in return; or
(G) Using profane, offensive or abusive language which is inherently
likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction.
(2) A person commits an offense if he conducts a solicitation by coercion.
8.13A.040. Evidence
Evidence to support a conviction for a violation of this chapter.may include, but is
~ not limited to, testimony of witnesses, videotape evidence of the violation, and
other admissible evidence.
~ 8.13A.050. Penalty.
Violation of 8.13A.020 shall be a misdemeanor. Violation of 8.13A.030 shall be a ~J
gross misdemeanor. -
Section 3. That Title 8 of the Tacoma Municipal Code Safety and Morals
be amended to eviact a new chapter to known as be cfiapter 8.13B "Solicitations to Occupants of Vehicles on Public Roadways Prohibited" consisting of four '
sections, reading as follows:
TMC chapter 8.13B. '
SOLICITATIONS TO OCCUPANTS OF VEHICLES ON PUBLIC ROADWAYS
PROH161TED. .
8.136.010 Definitions.
In this section:
, (1) GOODS means property of every kind.
(2) PUBLIC PROPERTY means:
(A) any property open or devoted to public use or owned by the city;
and (B) any area dedicated to the public use for sidewalk, street,
highway, or other transportation purposes, including, but not limited to, any curb,
median, parkway, shoulder, sidewalk, alley, drive, or public right-of-way.
(3) ROADWAY has the meaning given that term in RCW 46.04.500. A
complete copy of RCW 46.04.500 is on file with the City Clerk.
(4) SERVICES means any worlc done for the benefit of another person.
(5) SOLICITATION means any conduct or act whereby a person:
(A) either orally or in writing, asks for an immediate ride,
employment, goods, services, financial aid, monetary gifts, or any article
representing monetary value, for any purpose;
(B) either orally or in writing, sells or offers for immediate sale goods,
services, or publications;
(C) distributes without remuneration goods, services, or publications;
or
(D) solicits signatures on a petition or opinions for a survey.
(6) VEHICLE has the meaning given that term in RCW 46.04.670. A
complete.copy of RCW 46.04.670 is on file with the City Clerk.
8.9 3B.020. Prohibited Conduct
~ (1) A person commits an offense if, while occupying any public property adjacent
to any public roadway in the city, he knowingly conducts a solicitation directed to,
or intendeci to attract the attention of, the occupant of any vehicle stopped or
traveling on the roadway. An offense occurs when the solicitation is made,
~ whether or not an actual employment relationship is created, a transaction is
completed, or an exchange of money, goods, or services takes place.
(2) It is a defense to prosecution under TMC 8.138.020 that the person was:
(A) Summoning aid or requesting assistance in an emergency situation;
or
(B) A law enforcement officer in the perFormance of official duties; or C3} This section shall not apply to any firefighter soliciting donations ducing
the annual "Fill the Boot" campaign or to any volunteer assisting said firefighter.,, .
8.136.030. Evidence '
Evidence to support a conviction for a violation of this section may include, but is
not limited to, testimony of witnesses, videotape evidence of the violation, and
other admissible evidence. ~
8.13B.040. Penalty
Violation of this chapter shall be a misdemeanor.
Passed
Mayor
Attest:
~
City Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Assistant City Attorney ~
~
Req. # .
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE relating to public safety and morals, and amending Title 8 of the
Tacoma AAunicipal Code by repealing Section 8.13.030, "Vehicular or
Pedestrian Interference,° in its entirety; and by the enactment of two new
chapters thereto, to be known and designateti as Chapter 8.13A,
"Regulation of Solicitation," and Chapter 8.138, "Solicitations to Occupants
of Vehicles on Public Roadways Prohibited."
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near automated teller machines create a safety hazard and an increased potential
for criminal activity against persons using the machines, since those pQrsons are
often in isolated locabons with cash conspicuously in their possession, thereby
making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by solicitors, and
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near entrances and exits of banks, credit unions, and other similar financial institutions create a safety hazard and an increased potential for criminal activiry
against persons using those institutions, since those persons are often entering or
exiting those institutions with cash conspicuously in their possession, thereby
. l
making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by solicitors, and
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near exterior public pay phones create a safery hazard and an increased potenbal
for criminal activity against persons using the telephones, since those persons are
often in isolated locations with their attention distracted from their surroundings,
thereby making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by solicitors, and
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near self-service car washes create a safety hazard and an increased potential for
criminal activiry against persons using self-service car washes, since those
-1 -
Ord - 71tle 8 82105.doc
J
•
~ ~
~ Persons are often in isolated locafions with cash conspicuously in tfieir possession
and are usually a captive audience, with their attention distracted from their
surroundings as they have vehicles in various stages of cleaning, thereby making
them more vulnerable to and intimidated by solicitors, and WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near self-service fuel pumps create a safeiy hazard and an increased potential for criminal activity against persons using self-service, since those persons are often
in isolated locations with cash conspicuously in their possession and are usually a ~
captive audience, with their attention distracted from their surroundings as they fill
their vehicles with fuel, thereby making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by
solicitors, and
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations conducted
near public transportation stops create a safety hazard and an increased potential
~ for criminal activity against persons using the public transportation stops, since
thoss persons are usually a captive audience, often in isolated locadons, with their .
atkention distracted from their suROUndings as they wait and watch for necessary
transportation., thereby making them more vulnerable to and intimidated by
solicitors, and
V1lHEREAS the City Council has determined tfiat it is in the best interest of
the public health, safety, and wetfare to restrict the distances at which solicitations
may be conducted near those locations and facilities, and
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that solicitations for immediate
employment, goods, services, financial aid, or monetary gifts to the occupants of
-2-
Ord - TNe S 82106.abc
I .
O
. .
vehicles on public raadways distract dnvers, obstruct and impede the orderly flow
of traffic, cause traffic congestion, and create traffic and safety hazards that pose a
danger to the solicators, the persons solicited, and to the traveling public in general,
and
WHEREAS the City Council has deterrnined that the annual "Fill the BooY' .
campaign has well-established protections, including, but not limited to, wearing a reflective vest and an individual to monitor every firefighter or volunteer to ensure
that no solicitation to "Fill the BooY' im edes the ordert flow of traffc or causes ped~~~' 8.13.030 VAhicularor
y astAan lmerferenco.¶
A. The folCaeirvg 6LMinltbns apply in
any traffic congestion or safely hazards and 'h~"~`°°':1
, 1. 'P,A9rass9vefy beg' mearrs bo Oeg
u9th in:crt to InUmidabe errotRet
WHEREAS the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of ~ g g~~means~toaskfo ~o~o
goods as a cherity, whether by wmrda,
the public health, safety, and welfare to prohibit such solicitations to all occupants °„e°da~ ~~St°~5, s~9~s, °~ne`
3. 'OmsVua pedestrian or vefdcater
tmF('ic' meens to walk, stsnd, sit, fie or
of vehicles on public roadways, except for the annual „Fill the Boot„ campaign; ptom en objoct irr sseelt a manneras
to hloclc pasuge by enothcr person
d4ver n~d~
Now, Therefore, ctian
aulhorized by a pertnG iesuad
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TACOMA: odeasucnahsuerTUleu9`erPudeltt~'
shsU not wnstitute otrstructian of Section 1. That Section 8.13.030 of the Tacoma Munici al Code, entitled Pedestrianor~~a,xa,la►t~~.¶
p 4. 'Pubt'ic plaCe' means en orea
generally vfsibte to pubGc v~cw end
¢Vehicular or Pedestrian InterFerence," is hereb re ealed in its entirety. i^~udas QeeY9, bndges, buildtngs,
y p drPveway8, parking Eols. parka, plaza:.,
' sldewalls and sUeets open En the
I Section 2. That Title 8 of the Tacoma Pllunicipal Code is hereby amended by general public, irrduding thoss th-,.
serve food or drlnk or providc
entcrtainment, and tho doonroys end
the addition thereto of a new chapter, to known and designated as Chapter 8.13A, e~ ~ry~ grourtEs e~nclos9ng ths q
8. A porson is ginlty o1 pedasirpn
entitled "Re ulation of Solicrtation,° consistin of fve sections, and readin9 as tnteAerence it, in a publlC plece, ne or
g g she Intcrrtionslty:j
1. ObstruUs pedestrian ar vehiculsr
tramc; an
f01IOWS: 2 Aqgressively nega¶
C. Pedestrian interference may be
punlahed by a fine rtot te exce¢d
5500.00 or by irnprisonmenl in jal for
, a term nat to axceed 80 deys, ot Dy
baah such fino and &wisonrncnt9
Formatted: Rlght: -0.23"
FormatLedsRlgfit. -0.23, Keep-"'
with ntoQ„ Keep Iines together
-3-
Qrd - TUIe 8 821os.do,^,
I
. J
~
~
Section 3. That Titie 8 of the Tacoma Municapal Gode is hereby amended by
the addition thereto of a new Chapter 8.1313, to be known and designated as
-7-
Ord - Title 8 82106.doc
/
"Solicitations to Oocupants of Vehfcles on Public Roadways Prohibited,° consisting
.
of four sections, reading as follows:
r.
-8-
Ord - Tifb 8 82108.doc
/
; - - ~
/
~
Fassed •A
Mayor Attest: ^
Ciry Clerk
Approved as to form and legality:
Assistant City Attomey
~
-10-
Ord - Ti9c 8 82706.doc
I
.
O CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Meeting Date: Pulay 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
,
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ] admin. repoR ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Broadcasting/Webcasting Council Meetings
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: Council has expressed interest in Broadcasting (television) and/or
Webcasting (internet) council meetings. Staff gathered preliminary information regarding
options,
Research has revealed that there are no cities in the state of WA that are currently webcasting
only, webcasting for most other cities has evolved as a"byproduct" of television broadcasting.
What is webcasting?
Webcasting, or streaming video, is a technology that plays audio, video, and combined
audiolvideo files (either live or pre-recorded) on the Internet directly from a Web server for
immediate playback.
Regardless of whether the city broadcasts or webcasts, the same basic hardware is needed to
~ produce a quality video signal. Vllithout the cable franchise agreement in place, the city will be
responsible for purchasing the necessary hardware to create the signal.
OPTIONS: 1.) Live webcasting of council meetings with video-on demand playback.
Item Cost Description
Sony Anycast Station $20,000 audiofvideo switcher and mixer
3 Sony BRC3000Cameras $13,000 Video Camera
Sony Camera Controller $1,500 Controller for Camera's movements
Wiring $5,000 wiring for video
Part-time labor $10,000 part-time labor to produce meeting
Contingency , $10,000
Granicus web streaming 4$ 0.000 unlimited web streaming & playback
Total 104,500 Or 2.) Live webcasting of council meetings with video-on demand playback, with labor
outsourced.
Item Cost Description
Sony Anycast Station $20,000 audio/video switcher and mixer
Wiring $5,000 winng for video
Outsource labor CMN $25,000 Community Minded N
~ Contingency $10,000
Granicus web streaming 4$ 0.000 unlimited web streaming & playback
Total ' $100,000 :
Or 3.) Live broadcasting and webcastkng of council rneetings with video on dernanrl
playback. This would be #he most Mogical step and would provide both television and
internet access. However, the cable franchise agreement would need #o be in place. .
i
~ BUDGET1FIiVANCIAt IMPACTS: Costs would be about $100,000 for the first year depending
on the option selec#ed, Our research has alsa indicated that the annual cost of broadcasting a nd
' webcasting after the first year ranges between $100,000 arrd $250,000 and usuaEly has a
minimurn of 1 full time staff position.
STAFF COIdTACT: Information Technology Specialist Greg Singaman, Finance Director Ken
Thompson.
i
i
I -
~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check ail that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 0 admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Outdoor Pool Renovation Contingency
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Award of outdoor pool renovation project to Kilgore
Construction on March 19, 2008 in the amount of $2,893,123.55.
BACKGROUND:
Originally, the Parks and Recreation Department had established a$300,000 contingency for
this project. However, the total cost of the construction bids exceeded the total budget allocation (including the contingency). Allocation of an additional construction contingency was
overlooked in the process of approving the construction contract. The contingency is
~ anticipated at 5% - 7% of the total project cost.
Staff is recommending the establishment of a$200,000 pool contingency. Not all of the pool
renovation project will be completed in 2008 and therefore a portion of that budget will be used
to establish the contingency as outlined in the attached memo.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: City Council consensus to place this item on the
June 3 Council Agenda as an action item for Council to authorize staff to create a$200,000
Pool Renovation Contingency.
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS: No impact to 2008 budget. The 2009 budget will reflect
changes.
STAFF CONTACT: IVlichael D. Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation
ATTACHMENTS May 14, 2008 Memo to City Council
~
Siokane
Valley e
40;00 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: City Council, David Mercier, Cfty Manager, Mike Jackson, Deputy City Manager
From: Michael D. Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation
Date: May 14, 2008
Re: Outdoor Pool Renovation - Contingency
As you are aware, the outdoor pool renovation construction project was awarded to
Kilgore Construction on March 18, 2008 for a total contract amount of
$2,893,123.55. Unfortunately, there was no contingency included in that amount.
In order to create a$200,000 contingency for this project, staff has reworked the
2008 Adopted Budget for the Parks Capital Project Fund. There is no impact to the
2008 budget and the 2009 budget (which is being developed) will reflect the
changes made for 2008. The chart below illustrates the changes being proposed to
create the contingency. Please let me know if you have any questions or need
additional information.
Parks Capita) Project Fund
2008 Adopted 2008 Adjusted
Bud et Bud et - 5/20108 2009 Bud et
Swimming Pools and
Contingency $1,866,475.00 $2,657,014.00' $500,000.00
Universal Park $1,000,000.00 $800,000.00 $200,000.00
Park Land Acquisitian Reserve $563,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
Terrace View Park $293,000.00 $0.00 $100,000.00
Valley Mission Park $225,000.00 $372,790.00 $0.00
Green Acres Neighborhood Park $57,000.00 $357,000.00 $200,000.00
Park Improvements $60,000.00 $33,196.00 $0.00
Playground Repairs $25,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
Centennial Trail - Water System $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
Architectural Fees $21,489.00 $5,000.00 $0.00
Lighting $12,000.00 $5,000.00 $0.00
Park Im rovement Contin enc $126,536.00 $10,000.00 $0.00
Total Parks Capital Project
Fund $4,260,000.00 $4,260,000.00 $1,000,000.00
'Includes $200,000 Contingency
O CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council'Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent 0 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Barker Road Bridge Project - Consultant Construction
Management Services
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of 2005-2010 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan, which includes the Barker Road Bridge project, 2) Approval of a Local
Agency Agreement and Project Prospec#us with WSDOT, 3) Approval of Consultant Services .
Agreement for Type, Size and Location Study and Final Design Senrices, 4) Informational
Memo and draft scope of work on this proposed contract amendment included in Council's May
13, 2008 packets.
BACKGROUND: CH2M HILL has been the City's engineering and environmental consultant for
O the design of the Barlcer Road Bridge Project. As we move into the construction phase staff is
recommending an amendment to CH2M HILL's contract for Construction Management
Senrices. The City is currently in the process of directly hiring a bridge inspector for this project.
Therefore, daily inspection services will not be included in this additional work with CH2M HILL.
The costs outlined in this draft proposal for construction management services are preliminary
and will be refined in the coming weeks as the scope of work becomes finalized. Typically
construction management services for projects of tFiis size and complexity cost approximately
10% to 15% of the construction costs. We expect bids for construction in the range of $7.9
million to $10.2 million. -
OPTIONS: 1) Consent to place on June 3, 2008 agenda to amend current contract with CH2M
HILL to include construction management services, or 2) provide additional direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR IIfIOTION: Consent to place on June 3, 2008 agenda to amend
current contract with CH2M HILL to include construction management services.
BUDGEUFINANCIAL IMPACTS: This project is 100% funded through a Federal Bridge
Replacement Grant up to $9.985 million; the consultant contract is eligible for federal
reimbursement.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. UVodey, Senior Capital Projects Engineer
~ Neil Kersten, Public Worlcs Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft scope of work for construction management services.
EXHIBIT B2
Scope of Work for
Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project . .
Construction Management, Office Engineering Services, and
Resident Inspection
City of Spokane Valley, Washington
FHWA Project No. BRM 4123(004) May 2008
1.0 GENERAL
7`he purpose of this Scope of Work is to establish the specific scope of CH2M HTLL's
professional engineeri.ng services and compensation for Construction Management (Clvn,
Office Engineering Services, and Construction Inspection Seroices for the Bazker Road
Bridge Replacement project. .
~ The City of Spokane Valley (Spokane Valley) may make or approve changes within the
general scope of this agreement. If such changes affect CH2M HILL's cost of, or iime
requircd for, perforznance of the services, an equitable adjustment will be made through an
amenciment to this agreement. CH2M HILL will notii.fy Spokane Valley in writing of thE
occurrence of a change and an estimate of the cost impact. Spokane Valley will provide
written approval of change. A 10 percent contingency fund has been established for minor
changes to the 5cope of Work. Use of the contingency fund requires written authorizarion
from Spokane Valley.
CH2M HILL will provide Construction Management Services, Office Engineering Services,
and Constructivn Inspection Services, as defined below. These services are intended to
assist Spokane Valley to adrn.i.n.ister the contract for canstruction, monitor the performance
oF the construction Contractor ("Contractof'), verify that the Coniractor's work is in
subsrantial compliance with the construction Contract Documents, and assist Spokane
Valley in responding to events that occur during the construction. These services are basecl
upon the undersfiand.ing that Spokane Valley will contract direcdy with the Contractor and
will be actively involved i.n the construction process to make decisions, provide approvals,
and perform other aclions necessary far the completion of the construction. These services
are also based upon Spokane Valley executing a contract for construction -writh the
Contractor khat provides the requisite authority for CH2M HILL to fulfill its responsibil.ities.
CH2M HII..L's services are based upon the work described in the Apri12008 contract for
construction prepazed by CH2M HTLL and a 400 working day schedule or duration of
O construction anticipated at the time that these services are agreed. Deviations from the
anticipated construction activities, schedule, or duration of construction will materially
SPKfCM BARKER ROAD BRiDC'z SOrN 04292008.OOC 1 QF 9 188201.D1.8R
EXHIBR 82
affect the scope of these services and CH2M HILL's compensation for the services, and will
require an adJustment to CH2M HILL's compensation CH2M HILL will not perform
services beyond the agreed to contract scope without written authArization from Spokane
Valley. The level of effort to perform the work described is generally based on a standazd
five day work week and standazd eight-hour workday, but allows for occasional work
beyond the eight-hour day or into a weekend.
The services listed below will be provided in accordance with applicable gu.idelines from
the most current versions of the WSDOT Construction Manual and the WSDOT Local
Agency Guidelines (LAG) Manual. The presence or duties of CH2M HILL's personnel at a construcdon site, whether as onsite
representatives or otherwise, cio not make CH2M HTLL or CH2M HILL's personnel in any
way responsible for thvse duties that belong to Spokane Valley and/or the contractors or
other endties, and do not relieve the contractors or any other entity of their obligations,
duties, and responsibilities, including, but not limited to, all construction methods, means,
techniques, sequences, and procedures necessary far coordinating and completing all
portions of the construction work in accordance wikh the construclion Contract Documents
and any health or safety precautions required by such consiruction work.
As the Construction Manager on this project, CH2M HILL's project authority shall be as
prescribed in Section 1-05.2 of khe Washington State Standard Specifications for Road,
Bridge, and ivlunicipal Conslruction, 2008. CH2M HILL has no authority to exercise any
control over athers' health and safety but will notify affected personnel of any site
conditions posi.ng an imminent danger to thern whieh CH2M HILL observcs.
The presence of CH2M HILL's personnel at a construction site is for the purpose of
provid'u1g to Spokane Valley a greater degree of confidence that the completed construction
work will conform generally to the construction Contract Documents and that the integ-rity
of the design concept• as reflected in the construction Contract Documents has been implemented and preserved by the contractor(s). CH2M HILL neithe.r guarantees the
perEormance of the contractor(s) nor assumes responsibility for contractor's failure to
perform work in accordance with the construction Contract Documents.
2.0 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES
2.1 Establish Document Management System _
. CI IZM I-IILL will establish a system and set of procedures for managing, tracking and
storing all relevant documents between the Contractor, CH2M HILL and Spokane Valley
produced during the Construction and Closeout phases of the project. CH2M HII.L will
utilize an appropriate computer based document management system selected by
CH2M HILL. CH2M HILL will, in coordination with Spokane Valley, maintain hard copy
records, suitably organized, of all relevant documentation.
CH2M HILL will also implement procedures for the logging and tracking of all relevant
correspondence and documents. CH2M HILL will assist Spokane Valley i.n monitoring all
oufistand.ing decisions, approvals or responses required hom Spokane Vallcy.
~
SFKlCM BARKERR ROkD HRIDGE SOW 04292008AOC 20F9 168200I3R
MIBIT 82
~ 2.2 Conduct Pre-Construction Conference
CH2M HILL will coordinate and attend one pre-construction conference with the
Contractor to mview the project communication, coordination and other procedures and
discuss the Contractor's general workplan and requirexnents for the project. CH2M HILL
will take m.inutes and may otherwise record the results vf this conference.
2.3 Conduct Project Site Meetings
CH2M HILL will conduct weekly meetings with the Contractor and will prepare khe
minutes of these meetings.
2,4 General CM Support
CH2M HILL will provide services i.n coordinating the site activities, administering the
contract for construction,, monitoring the Contractor's performance, responding to design
and technical submit", and closing out the contract for construction. The following
services are included as part of this task: 2.4.9 Progress Payrments CH2M HILL will prepare Contractor pay requests, including appropriate
documentation of force account and bid item documentation via paynotes. CH2M HILL, will use the WSDOT Conskruction Manual and WSDOT Local Agency
Guidelines (LAG) Manual in the prepazadon of the contractor's pay request.
CH2M HILL wi11 advise Spokane Valley as to the status of the toYal amounts
~ requested, paid, and remaining to be paid under the terms of the construction
Contract Documents.
. Recommendations by CH2M HILL to Spokane Valley for payment will be based
upon CH2M HILL's measurements, calculations.and/or other information as
requixed by the measurement and payment sections of the construction Contract
Documents and the appl,icable WSDOT Manuals. Such recommendations do not
represent that the Contractor has completed the work in exact accordance wikh the
contrach for construction; that CH2M I-IILL has made an examination to ascertain
how or for what purpose the Contractor has used the moneys paid; that title to any
of the wark, materials or equapment has passed to Spokane Valley free and clear of
liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances.
2.4.2 Field Instructions and Orders
CH2M HILL will issue field instructions, orders or similar documents duxi,ng
construction as provided in the coniract for construction.
2.4.3 Correspondence and Gommunications •
CH2A4 HILL will implement and maintain regular communications with the
Contractor during the construction. CH2M HILL wiU receive and log all
communications hom the Contractor and will coordinate the communications
belween Spokane Valley and Contractor. CH2M HILL will not provide direction
direcfly to the Contractor's subcontractors. CH2M HILL will prepare written
communications to the Contractor and provide recomznendations to Spokane Valley
~ for written coinznunzcations between Spokane Valley and Contractor.
SPK(CM BARHER RQAD BPoOGE SOW 0429QOO8.00C 3 OF 9 188281A1.BR
' EXFffiR 82
2.4.4 Minor Variations in the Work '
CH2M I IILL may authorize minor variations in the work which do not involve an ~adjustrnent in the Contractof s contract price nor time for construction and are not
inconsistent with the intent of the construction Contract Documents.
2.4.5 Trafflc Control
CH2M HILL will review Contractor-prepared traffic control plans, and will make
recomznendations to Spokane Valley regarding the acceptability of the Contractor's
plans.
2,4.6 Environmental/Agency Permits
CH2M HILL will review, and assist in enforcing requi.rements sdpulated in Spokane
Valley's permits issued by regulatory and environsnental agencies.
2.4.7 Coordinate Issuance of Changes
CHZM HILL will receive and review the Contractor's response to the request for
change and will obfiain such further information as is necessary to evaluate the basis
for Yhe Contractor's proposal. CH2M HILL wiU assist Spokane Valley with
negotiations of the proposal and, upon approval by Spokane Valley, prepare final
change order documents for eacecution by Spokane Valley and ContractAr.
2.4.8 Revlew of Contractor's Requested Changes
CH2M HILL will review construction contract changes. CH2M HILL will make
recommendations to Spokane Valley regarciing the acceptability of the Contractoes
request and, upon approval of Spokane Valley, assist Spokane Valley in negotiations
of the requested c:hange. Upon agreement and approvaL CI-I2M HILL wi11 prepare
final change order documents. The budget assumes up to _ change orders will be
prepared that will includE specifications and a sum total of _ plan sheets.
2.4.9 Change Order Reports
CH2M HILL will provide periodic reports to Spokane Valley about the status of
Change Orders. The report will include issued Change Orders, pencling change
orders, and c:hange order amounts.
2.4.10 Claims and Disputes
CH2M HILL will receive, log, and notify Spokane Valley about all letters and notices
from the Contractor concerning claims or disputes between the Contractor and
Spokane Valley pertaining to the acceptability of the work or the interpretation of
the requirements of the contract for construction. CH2M HIL.L will review all such
letters and notices and will discuss them with the Contractor as necessary to
understand . each such cla.i.tn or dispute. CH2M HILL will advise Spokane `'alley
regarding the Contractor's compliance with the contract requirements for such claims and disputes. CH2M HILL will assist Spokane Valley in discussions with the
ContYactor to resolve cla.ims and disputes.
CH2M HILL will not issue decisions on Contractor claims or disputes. CH2M HILL
will not, except as part of Additional Services, undertake comprehensive a.nd
detailed invesdgation or analysis of Contractor's claims and disputes, nor ~
partidpate in judicial or alternative dispute resolution procedures for the clai.ms vr
SP!(fCM 9ARKER RQAD BFdDGE SO'N 04292008.OOC 4 OF 9 1882Di.O1.eR
DCIClBIT 92
0 disputes. CH2M HILL wiU use the WSDOT Construction Manual and LAG Manual
i.n the resalution of claims and disputes.
2.4.11 Contractor's Schedule Submittal
CH21V( HILL will review the Contractor's construction schedule and verify that it is
'
consistent with the requirements of the contract for construction. CH2M HILL will
advise the Contractor of any areas where the schedule is not in coinpliance with the
contract for rnnstruckion. CH2M HILL wiU provide comments to Spokane Valley to
assist SpokanE Valley in approving, accepting or taking other actian on the contractor s schedule, in accordance with the contract for construction.
CH2M HILL's review and comments shall not be considered as a guarantee or
confirmation khat the Contractor will complete the work in accordance with the
coniract for construction.
2.4.12 Contnctor's Schedule Updates
CH2iVI HILL wiU review the Contractor's periodic schedule updates or other
schedule submissions. CH2M HILL will advise the Contractor if the updates or
other submissions are not i.n accordance with the contract for construckion.
CHZM HILL will provide comments to Spokane Valley regarding the updates or
other submissions. CH2M HILL will monitor the Contractor's progress on a weekly
basis and report any significant changes to the project's available flvat and/or the
project's critical path. .
O 2.4.93 Effect of Change Orders
CH2M HILL will review information submitted by the Contractor regarding the
effect of proposed or issued Change Orders upon the construction schedule,
duration ana completion date. CH2M HILL will advise Spokane Valley as to the
. potential impact of proposed or issued Change Orders. CH2M HILL will assist
Spokane Valley in discussions with the Contractor concerning the poteniial impact
of proposed or issued Change Orders.
2,5 Final Inspection 1 Closeout / Warranty
CH2M HILL will assist Spokane Val,ley in issuing docurnents for substantial completion
and acceptance of the work. CH2M HILLL will advise Spokane Valley on payment, and
paztial release of retention. CH2M HILL will assist Spokane Valley in issuing documents
for final complEtion and acceptance of the wark. CHZM HILL wiU advise Spokane Valley
on final paym.ent, release of retention, and release of insurance and bonds. CH2M HILL
will provide to Spokane Valley an organized set of project documents and records.
CH2M HILL is not responsible for any unauthorized reuse or alteration of project
documents.
3.0 OFFICE ENGINEERING SERVICES
•
,3.1 Engineering Design Support
CH21VI HILL will provide written responses to the Contractor's request for interpretakion or
f~ clarification of the contract documents. CH2M HILL will review shop drawings, samples,
and submithals for conformance with the design concept and compliance with the
SPIUCM 9AHKER RUAU BRIDGE SOV104292008.OOC 5 OF 9 188201.D1.BR
EXwBR B2
requirements of the plans and specificakions for construction. CH2M HILL will aLso require ~
the Contractor to submit these items as required by the construction coniract, the LAG
Manual and the Construction Manual.
C112M HILL will coordinate up to six (6) visits to the site by selected design team members
to review progress and quality of the work. The visits will observe the general quality of
the work at the tizne of the visit and review any specific ite.ms of work that are brought to
the attention of the design team members by the Construction Manager.
3.2 Submittals
In accordance with the ConstrucHon Manual and the LAG Manual,, as well as the WSDOT-
generated Record of Materials (ROIv), and subsequent adciitions made to the ROM by
CH2M HIL.L, CH2M I IILL will coordinate with the design team for the reviews of the
Contractor's shop drawings, samples, and other submittals. CH2M HILL will log and track
shop drawings, samples, and submittals. CH2M HILL's review of shop drawings, samples, and submirtals will be for conformance with the design concept and compliance with the requirements of the contract for
construction. Such review shall not relieve the Contractor from its responsibility for
performance in accordance with the contract for construction, nor is such review a
guarantee that the work covered by the shop drawings, samples, and submittals is free of
errors, inconsistencies, or omissions. CH2M HILL will provide conunents to Spokane
Valley in approving, accepting, or taking other action on the shap drawings, samples, and
submittals as appropriate.
7
CH2M HILL's scope assumes amaximum of two subnvssions by the Contractor for each
shop drawing, sample, or submission. Should the average number of reviews exceed two reviews per subzn.ittal CI-IZM HILL will be entitled to additional compensation.
3.3 Requests for Information
CH2M HILL will review the ConiTactor's requests for inforrnation (RFI) or clarification of
the plans and specifications for construction. CH2M HILL will coordinate such review with
the design team and with Spokane Valley as appropriate. CH2M HILL will coordinate and
issue responses to the RFIs. CH2M HILL will log and track the Contractor's RFIs.
CH2M HILL will assist Spokane Valley in reviewing and respontlulg to the Contractox's
requests for substitution of materials anti equipment. C142M HILL will review such
requests and will advise Spokane Valley as to the acceptabilily of such substiiulions.
3.4 Record Drawings
CH2M HILL will revise the original design drawings to reflect available record information
provided by the Contractor, inspectof s reports, or survey data. One reproducible set and
three hard copies will be submitfied to Spokane Valley. Copies of electronic AutoCAD files
will also be submitted. CHZM HILL is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness af
as-built drawing or survey information provided by the Contractor or other entities.
~
SPKICM BAFi9CER ROJ40 BRMGE SO'N Q4292d08.DOC 6 OF 9 188201.01.BA
EXHIBR 82
~ 4.0 RESIDENT INSPECTION
4.1 Resident Inspection
CI-I2M HILL wiU conduct daily on-site inspections of the Contractor's work for the
purposes of determining if the work conforms to the contract for construction and khat the
integrity of the design concept as reflected in the contract for consiruction has been
implemEnted and preserved by the Contractor. CH2M HILL wi,ll supervisc field inspection
shaff, who wiU prepare written Inspector Daily Reports (IDR's), and other records of their
observations, which will be provided to Spokane Valley.
CH2M HILL's inspection staff will arrange for monthly photographs of the work in
progress by the Contractor, which will be provided to Spokane Valley. Photographs will be
labeled when necessary to identa,fy location of work.
CH2M HILL's observations and inspecNon of the work is not an exhaustive observation or'
inspeclion of all work performed by the Contractor. CH2V1 HILL does not guarantee the
performance of the Contractor. CH2M HILL's ohservations shaA not relieve the Contractor
from responsibility for performing the work in accordance with the contract for
construction, and CH2M HILL shall not assume liability in any respect for the construction
of the project. CHZIVT HILL vvill, wihh the assistance of Spokane Valley, obtain written plans .
from the Contractor for quality control of its work, and wiU monitor the Contractor's
compliance with its plan. ~ CH2M HILL's Resident Inspection will include the followulg: 4.9.1 Deficient and Non conformrng Work
Should CH2M HILL d.iscover or believe that any work by the Contractor.is not in
accordance with the contract for construction,, or is othenvise defeckive, or not
cvnformung to requirements of the contract or applicable rules ana regulations,
C112M HILL will bring this to the attention of the Contractor and Spokane Valley.
CH2M HILL wiU thereupon monitor t,he Contractor's corrective actions and will
advise Spokane Valley as to the accEptabil.ity of the corrective actions.
4.9.2 Performance and Witness Testing
CH2M HTLL will attend and witness field and factory performance tests as specified
irt the contract for construction and CH2M HILL's contract scope.
4.1.3 Regulatory and Third Party Testing and Inspections
CH2M HILL will inonitor the Conlx-actor s coordinahion of inspection and teski.ng by
regulaYory and third pazty agencies that have jurisdiction over the project.
4.1.4 Subsurface and Physical Conditions
Whenever the Contractor notifies CH2M HILL or Spokane Valley of differing
subsurface or physical conciitions at the site, CH2M HILL wiU advise Spokane
Valley as to the appropriate action(s), and will assist Spokane Valley in responding
to the Contractor.
If additional borings or other subsurface testing is required to investigate the
O subsurface or physical conditions khen such additional investigation shall be
considered an Additional Service.
SPK1Ch18AAKER ROAD BRIDGE SOW 04292008.00C 70F9 1882DfA1.BR
EMiear e2
4.9.5 Substantial and Flnal Completion . ~
CH2M HILL wi.ll assist Spokane Valley with inspections at substantial and final
completion, in accordance with the conlTact for construcdon. CH2M HILL will
prepare up to iwo (2) separate punch lists of items requiring completion or
correction by Contractor. CH2M HILL will make recommendations to Spokane
Valley regarding acceptance of the work based upon the results of the final
inspection.
4.2 Material Testing and Special Inspection
CH2M HILL will, either through its own personnel or through the employ of an
independent firm„ perform or cause to be performed material testing or specialty inspection
required by the construction contract, the LAG Manual and the Construction Manual.
CH2M HILL will review the reports and other inforination prepared by the independent
firms. CH2M HILL will coordinate the testing firms' schedules and the transmittal of their
reports, findings or other information to the Contractor and/or Spokane Valley. ~iis_task
des~crip~tion z, vcll'~~ expan to:~lis~anhcipated te ns g_cinii;special;ins~aectlori zuork.] ~
4.3 Technical Field -Inspectlon - Structures
CH2M HILL will provide technical specialists to provide inspeetion of the contractor's work
specifically related to the bridge structurE and retain.ing walls for this projeck
4.4 Surveying
. ,
CH2M HILL wil.l pzovide field surveying to establish and verify survey control paints ~
shown to be provided by Spokane Valley i,n the construction Contract Documents. l
CH2M HIL,L will also provide additional surveying to delineate the right-of-way _
bou.ndazies or other elements of the project, as may be requested by Spokane Valley. ,
Surveying under this task does not i.nclude work to layout the bridge and reta.ining wall
structures or roadway and utility work. Nor does this task included licensed surveying to
document the location of or reset existing monuments. The ConiTactor wil] be responsible
for aU surveying necessary to layout the bridge and retaining wall structures, roadway and
utility eleTnents, and for establishing and resetting monuments in accordance with the
construction Contract Documents. The budget assumes up to 3 days of survey crew and
office time needed ta perform surveying under this task.
4.5 Cultural Resources Monitoring GItI2ivI'~F~iILLw•ill.,,;..'
5.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT & COORDINATION
CH2M HILL will provide overall project management and coordination with Spokane
Valley. A total time of 24 months is assumed to be the duration for this work. Project
management services include:
• • Project instructions and work plan
, • Staff and subconsultant management
• Quality management plan ~
• Control budget and schedule
SPK/CA16AR9fER ROAD BRIDGE SOW 04291008.1)bC 8 0F 9 188201.D1.BR
Ex►+iert ea
0 • Monthly progress reports and i:nvoices (The progress report/invoice will identify the work perfonned for that period, major decisions, schedule, and budget status.
• Routine communication and coordination with Spokane Valley.
6.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
The folloxving services will be provided by CH2M HII.L upon written authorization of
Spokane Valley and agreement on compensation to CH2M HILL. An amendment to the
contract will serve as written authorization.
• Services related to development of Spokane Valley's project financing and/or
budget.
' • Services related to disputes over pre-qualification, bid protests, bid rejection and re-
bidding of the contract for construction.
• Services related to provision of Spokane Valley fumi.shed equipment, materials, and
supplies. • Serviccs necessary due to the default of the Contractor.
• Services related to damages causEd by fire, flood, earthquake or other acts of God.
• Services related to Spokane Valley's operation and use of the completed project
other than as spedfically provided in the above scope of work.
~ • Services relateci to warranty claims, enforcement and inspection. • Preparation for and serving as a witness in connection with any public Qr private
hearing or other forum related to the project.
• Services to support, prepare, document, bring, defend, or assist in litigation
undertaken or defended by Spokane Valley.
• Perform miscellaneous and supplemental services related to the project as
requested by Spokane Valley.
~
SPKfCM BARKER ROAD BRIDGE SOYf 042920000C 9 OF 9 188201.01.BR
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
MEeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check ail that appFy: ❑ oonsent Z old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Barker Road Bridge Project - Avista Electric Memorandum of
Understanding GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN.: 1) Approval of 2007-2012 Six Year Transportation
Improvement Plan, which includes the Barker Road Bridge project; 2) Informational Memo on
Utility Agreements in Council's March 4, 2008 packets.
BACKGROUND: Avista Utilities has an electrical distribution line directly east of the Barlcer
Road Bridge that must be reloGated prior to the construction of the new bridge. Constn.iction will
' require temporarily relocating the overhead lines onto private property north of the Spokane
River. This agreement outlines the sharing of costs associated with the temporary relocation of
~ the overhead lines until the project is complete.
OPTIONS: 1} Consent to place this item on the agenda for approval at the June 3, 2008
Council meeting, or 2) provide direction to staff.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consent to place this item on the agenda to approve
at the June 3, 2008 Council meeting. ' .
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: This projec# is 100% funded through a Federal Bndge
Replacement Grant up to $9.985 million; these costs would be covered by the grant.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Avista Electric Memorandum of Understanding.
O
UiZAE~ I' MF.MORANDUM UF ttNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN TRE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AND
AYiSTA CORPORATION
FOR TNE CONSTRUCTION OF TRF BARKER BRIUGE REPLACF.MENT PROJEC?
WHER6AS as a part of its 2008 Transportation Improvement ProgranL thc CITY OF
SPUKANE VALLEY (che Cl7'Y) intends to construcl the Barker Bridge ReplacempIIt Prujcct
(Bridge Projeci) over the Spokane River. 'ilx work includes demolition of the existing bridge and
widcniag the new bridge located between Mission and Euclid Avenues. Thc purposc of the
Agrecmcnt is to define resFonsibitities and aUocate casts for wark related to the bcidgc project for
both Avista Corparation (Avista) and the C1TY.
WHEREAS Av7sta currently 6as overhead high voltsige feeder pawer cables supported fmm
poles nlong the east edge of the Barl:cr Road right-of-way. Avista ciurently has no plan to
relocatc these facilities onto the new hridge structurc. These overhead facilicics need to he
tempararily relocated in order for the Cit}•'s contmetor to replace the bridgc.
NOW THCREF(}RC, the CIn' and Avista do hereby agrec as follows:
ARTICLE 1- RESPONSIBILITIFS OF THE C['fY
1. Alans and specifieations far the Bridge Project liave been prepared by the C17'Y* and
the CITY unticiFates opening bids for the Kridge Project in Muy 2008 and inteads to
begin cocLSwction of ►hc Bridge Pmject in June 2008.
2. Upon awarding a contract for the Bridge Project, tlie CI'['N' shall havc full control
over the msultant conswclicm cuntract t►nd shall be the adtninistratur for the project.
ARTiCI..E 2- RFSPONSIBII.ITIES OF AVISTA
l. Shall relocate its nverhead system beyond the anticipated bridge coastructian
iniluence zone as depicted on the attached Exhibit 'A'. This work shrill be
completed withia five weeks after execution of this Agrccment by both parties.
Upon completian of the BarL•er Road E3ridse Project, or at an earlier time if agrred
to by both partics, Avista shall rclocaic thcir overhead system from the praposed
temporsin location immcdiately narili of the bridge to Lhr pcrmanent location.
Shall instnll a new pole to replace the existing polr on llic: noRh bank of the river
cast of Baricer Road. Ttvs new• pole shall be approximately S feet east of thc
existing pole. Thc ovcrhead systein sluttl be rclocated to this ncw polc in
accordance with item 1 above.
3. Shall provide the C17`Y evidence af costs to 1) instafl said new polc north of the
river, currently estimaled at 54,100, and 2) relocate overhead systcm to said new
pole, currently cstimated at $3,850.
Mnn„riadum 4 1!nci-rnunduiF Kukcr Hn.lgc A~iz:r UttlituF 2(k13 Page l of 2
a
T''.IT'ublu ~C'crk5':~.ajatd Pnncct~'',,C~nd,;c I'rnJctlu'+,t+1•kcr kIai Iin_fp~'..lieluy !440il\Ai( IU Fsarkcr tin;l,;r A~irta Eht 051408A
4. Sha11 designate a"responsible pcrson" who shall represent Avista Electric's
interest during the construction of the Bridge Project, and shall coordinate any
modifications or changes needed by the CITY in conjunction with the work.
ARTICLE 3- ALLOCATION OF COSTS
l. This Memorandum of Understanding, once fully executed, shall establish a
commitment by Avista to pay any and all costs that may be inewrred by thE relocation
of Avista power poles for the project, with the exception of items 2, 3 and 4 below; .
2. The CITY shall, within 30 days of invoice, reimburse Avista for the following costs:
•$2,400, the cost for a temporary easement to reloGate Avista's pole onto
private property immediately north of the Spokane River east of Barker
Road;
• The costs for instal.ling a new pole as described above, currently
estimated to be $4,100; .
• The costs for relocating Avista's overhead system back to said new pole,
currently estimated to be $3,850;
3. Avista shall obtain a permit from the CITY to perform work Nvithin the CITY'S right-
of-way for the relocation. -
4. Costs for any addi6onal work not listed in this agreement shall be agreed upon prior to the "
work.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
By: Date: 2008.
David Mercier, City Managcr
By: Date: 2008.
Office of thc Ciiy Attorney
AVISTA CO1tPORATION: By: Date: 2008.
Avista Corporation
Memorandum of i3nderstancling &arkec Bridge - AvisCa Utlities 2008 Page 2 of 2
P:\Pu6lic Works\Capirrl Pcojccts\i3ridge Pcnjects\Fiackec Road Briclge\Utility MOU\MpU Bazkee Bridge - A%i.sta Elct 051408.doc
0 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meet(ng Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TIfiLE: Storm Drainage Easement
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.02.180
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: City of Spokane Valley (through Spokane County prior to incorporation) purportedly
owns a storm waster easement, acquired from Robert A. Bonuocelli, East Bannen Properties. The
address of tfie property wvhere the easement was granted is 14211 East Sprague Avenue. Mr. Bonuccelli
was not the legal owner of this speci#ic parcel and therefore could not grant any easement on this
property. The improperly granted easement currently acts as a cloud on the title, and this release will
release any right that may have been acquired under the easement, atthough it is doubtful tfiat any
~ easement right exists. In essence, this action would clean up a clerical mistake.
OPTIONS: Staff requests Council direction on how to proceed.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council authorize staff to execute the Release of Easement.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell
ATTACHMENTS:
Release of Easement document
Memorandum regarding Drainage Easement Surplus
PAap
~
~
RELEASE OF EASEMENT
• REFERENCE 8706020260
GRANTOR: Robert A.Bonuccelli, East Bannen Properties
GRANTEE: Spokane County-
SHORT LEGAL: Ptn.SW1/4 FW1/4 14-25-44
ASSESSOR'S PROPERTY TAX PARCEL: 45143.9087 -
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that City of Spokane Valley, as
the successor in interest pursuant to RCW 35.02.180, is the owner of a storm
water easement acquired from Robert A. Bonuccelli, East Bannen Properties,
O dated May 21, 1987 and recorded, under Spokane County Auditor's File No.
8706020260, records of Spokane County, Washington, over the real property
'described therein as follows:
That portion of the Southwest Quaiter (SW 1/4) of the -Southwest
Quarter (SW 1/4)'of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 44,East, W.M., described as follows: .
Beginning 1097.50 feet East and 80.00 feet North of the Southwest
corner of said Section, thenoe North 25.00 feet, then East 30.00
feet, thence South 18.00 feet, thence 60.00 feet, thence South 7.00 feet, thence West 90.00 feet to the True Point of beginning.
The City of Spokane Valley does hereby abandon and release all rights
acquired under said easement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this instrument to
be executed this day of .2008.
BY: O Printed name
. ~
STATE OF WASHINGTON .
COUNTY OF SPOKANE On this day of , 2008, before me, the undersigned, a
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn,
personally appeared to me know
to be the person who signed as ---title-- the corporation that executed the within
and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged said instrument to be her free and
voluntary act and deed and the free and voluntary act and deed of ---grantee--
for the uses and purposes therein mentioned; and on oath stated that she/he
authorized to execute the said instruction on behaf# of said --grantee--. .
IN WITNESS WHERE OF I have hereunto set my hand and official seal
the day,and year first above written.
(Signature of Notary)
(Print or stamp name of Notary) ,
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at:
(City)
My Appointment Expires:
~
,
Notary seal, text and all notations must be 1' margins
~ S okane
P
~*m 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
le. - 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cftyhall@spokanevalley.or--g
Memorandum
To: 1Vlayor Rich Munson, Members of the City Council .
From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
CC: Dave Mercier, City Manager, Mike Jackson, Deputy City
Manager Date: March 19, 2008
Re: Drainage Easement Surplus
The City of Spokane ~ kane Valle ~ obtained a stormwater easement (located at 14211
O
East Sprague Avenue) from Spokane County ugon incorporation, pursuant to
RCW 35.02.180. The County was erroneously ganted the easement by the
property owner of the adjoining property, because the legal description contained
dn error identifying the vvrong progerty. Due to the erroneous transfer, the
Finance Department is recommending that the City of Spokane Valley release any
riahts acqui.red for the easement on parcel 45143.9087. After researching tlus
.transfer, it is apparent that the adjoining properiy owner is the legal owner of the
particular parcel in question. Therefore, a Relcase of Eascment needs to be
completed. SVMC Section 3.40.070(b) rEquires a declaration that real property
be declared surplus by the Spokane Valley City Council prior to its disposal. The criteria for a dcclaration oFsurplus property include the following:
l. The City has or anticipates no practical, efficient, or appropriate use for
the property.
2. The purpose served by the properly can be accomplisbed by use of a
better, less costly or more efficient altcrnative.
3. The purpose served by the propert}, no longer exists as detennined by a
change of policy or practice.
My opinion is that all three of these criteria are met in this instance. Tlus
O easement is a cloud on the property title and does not benefit the legal property
owner. The improperly granted easement extends nearly the width of the property
1
frontage, and precludes effective access to the interior of the property. The ~
Release of Easement will allow the ProPertY owner to develoP the Parcel.
,
c ,
2
~ ~~y ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ cr ~nrnr~~aT~~R1~---.~
C2 w C#2
r4a N N
.4 ce r„
t,j~,ia ~ ~ A ~a ~ ~ 1 . ~ -'~f~ ~
r~
~ ~
~ c"
T_ --z~.
z,
o m ~ 0.
( ~vj 33 = ~
?
~ ~
z 0
~zrr:GLR~Sl-LT~..~-~~) 1\1.n f I I ~'s ~j ~ y a ~
-.P- ~
BOL[V R RD 3 mP m r
_ ~ a a ?y
~ a~ ~ ~
w w w w q SN U5 ~~J'? - u, ~ '
zo ~ ~ S m ° I I
~ r 03 m co ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ _ i ~.~CI ~ 1~~ T~
ru ~i ~ $ 'sa o ~~r
.t+ s~. r y - _
' fill
1~ L~
w w w w ~
T ~ ~ ID
° w us ~o w ra w ta► w c.a
o O O o ~ Q O
m ~ M m 1 C
~.j
o eo -rv 1 A4a fco
~ a vr w tv a~ ~
ia tiTQ~; ~pA t. E
(a J
b
~ c~ssa I ~ cx,y
:t7 q
VE1 Ltl 1' U A1JD LTION
JL--
BES1' RD
W zo ~ ~
[~7 na -e' -r ia ,
~ ~ o o .___i ° 1
o ~ cn
1'
~ v A ~~C ~r I ~ I w~
w o ~ ~ ~ ~RECS .V~RD ~ ~ f #
~
N ~ co
cn ~ ca ~ ~ ~
h
v ~ r 13 -~'^'f
='M, cm.e ~
~ ~ o
~ aumw
~ W
~ 0 I i
N ~ ,
~J6 ~ ~
f A T V f 11F %n - ( r.~ ~LT ~ n
~
~ CITY OF SPOKANE 11ALLEY ~
Request for Courtcil Ac#ion
, Meeting Da#e: May 20, 2008 C i#]r Martager S ign-off: . .
Item: Check all #hat app ly: [l consent ❑ ald business ❑ new+r business ❑ public hearing
0 information CO adrnin_ repor# ❑ Rending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: County Wide Planning Policies Update
GOVERNI NG LEGISLATIQN; RC1N 36,70A G rowth NOanagement Act
PRE1fIOUS COUNClL ACTION TAF(EN: The City Council has taken a number af steps to
facilitate and irnplement jaint planning and the oTderly development o# Urban Growth Areas
(UGA) _ The C ouncil h as approved one Joint Plannin g Agreement for the Turkle Creek UGA,
BACKGROUND: This matter was recently before the City Council to review and comrnent on
the request by Spokane County far fnancial assistance in completing the necessary capitaf
facility analysis and environmental studies necessary far the adoption of expanded UGA
bountlaries, T h e a##ached report is an update to that request a n d additiona] matters that will be
~ proposed to the Growth Management Steering Gommittee next week,
OPTIOAIS: Review and pra+ride guidance.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: IVA
BUDGET}FIIdANCIAL IMPAC'TS; NA
STAFF CDNTACT: Mike Connelly, City Attorney
ATTAC iiMENT : Memorandurn to Mayar, C ity Counci ! with Exhibits
a
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
0 1vUCHAELCONNELLY,CITYAT"1'ORNEY ,
crry (W
~ CARY P. I?RISKF-Ll,, DEYUTY CTl'Y ATTORNEY ~
~ 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 + Spakane Yalley WA 99206
, 509.92 1. 1000 4 Fax: 509.921.1DQ8 # cityhafl@spoScanevalley.org Memorandum
To: Mayor Rich Mun son, mernbers of the City Council
From: Michael F. Connelly, City Atkorney
CC: Dave Mercier, Cit'y Manager; Mike Jaek~on, Depufy City .
Manager; Kathy McClung, C'omtnuni#y DevelDpment Director
L Spokane Countv Comvliaacc Status
0 Spokaae County is subject to a number of different compli.ance deatil4nes. 7'hese
deadlites arise fram state law, a speci#ic contract with CT'ED aild decisions from the
CCrowth Management Hearings $oard. As best as I could discvver the c=nt schedule of
compliance is as foHaws•.
The Spokane County Comprehensive Plwi was adoptad in 2001. 'fhe deadlin.e for
- compided an arnended comprehensive plan and associated develvpment regulations was
I7ecember 1, 2006. Tte County has completad most o£their cornprebensive plan updates
and assorHated developroent rcgulations at this #ime. Iti= mot completed include:
A. The Critical Areas Ordinar,ce. The deadline for compliance was extended to
I2I1l07. Public hearFngs have been held but the conamissioner"s have nat yet '
delibera#ed.
, B. Amended [Jrban Growth Areas. Currcnt state law requires that U~'rA."s be
re-viewed and amended every 10 years. Spokane County Area Wide Planning
Policies require that rhis occur every five years (December 1, 2006) The state !
does not consicler the Caurity to be out of compliance with State law with respect
to the TJGA's. There is a possibility that someozte could bring an action before the
~ ~'rrowkh Management Hearings 13oard alleging nan-compli.ance with #he County- I
Wide Plantung Policies ifthey a-re not auxtiendad.
~ C. Shoreline Managemen#s Plan and Shoreline Ordinance. (Approxitnately two
. Yearsoutof compliance.)
1
-'l
,
D. Compliance issues raised by the Growth Management Hearing Board. These `
are specifically in reladon to the L7rban Growth ArEas located north of the City
of Spokane. nese issues are currently under appeal.
H. Proposed Changes to the 5aokane Countv Area Wide Planning Policies
A. Item 16 changes the review period for revising UGA's from 5 years to 10
years. The Planning Technical Committee is supporting this change. The change
would eliminate the potential for a claim to the Growth Management Hearing
Board that the County is out of compliancE with the adopted County Wide
Planning Policies.
B. Item 17 establishes "triggers" for more frequent updates and review of UGA
boundaries. Staff has raised questions about one of the three proposed "triggers".
T'hc provision reads as follows:
c. Population growth within all CIGAs that have not been assigned to cities
eyuals or ezceeds fifty percent of the additional population capacity eslimated for the unassigned UGAs at the start of a hvenly year planning
neriod
.
'1'he intent of this is somewhat unclear. It does seem to perpetuaic the County ~ held belief that urban areas not associated with cities are appropriate. ~A complete copy of the proposed revisions is attached as Exhibit 1.
M. Re6onal CollabQ4iQm Urban GrQw_tb. Area Uudate- Recom.m.endatians and
Policv Consideradons
Approximately one year ago the technical committee compiled a document entitled the
Regional Collaboration Urban Growth Area Report. This was presented to the Growth Management Steering Committee and objectcd to by thc Counry Commissioners. No
further action was taken with respect to that report. The tc;chnical committee has now
completed its update to the same rcport. This will be presented to the Growth
Management Steering Committe,e at the neact meeting. Key policy issues the steering
committee will be asked to consider are as follows:
A. Thc change in County wide planning policies set forth above.
B. The adoption of a final population project for Spokane County. The Couuty
initially adopted the OFM medium number plus 12 and' %Z The technical committec '
will recommend the OFM medium number. Specifically the report states:
2
O The land quantity analysis reveals that under the Washington state offrce of
Financial Manclgement's (OPM) medium forecast, the County currently has
suffccient ccrpacity within the ezisting 1vfetro UGA to meet the capacity
requirements for a 20 year UGA planning horuon to 2028. The higher
population forecast and associaled jurisdictional population allocation numbers,
upproved for '~planning purposes" by the Board of County Commissioners on
May 23, 2006 would however, require expansion of the existing Metro UGA.
previously the Growth Management Steering Comrnittee had recommended the OFM
medium number and at a subsequent meeting had approved the Commissioner's request
to support the OFM plus 12.5% number.
Additional study and analysis would be required if the higher population projection is
used. If all thc agencies within the county adopt this higher number it would result in
additional planning requirements (for capital facilities study environmental analysis) and
could result in additional capital facility costs for cides, the County, as well as fue and
school districts. The additional planning costs for expandEd UGA's were the subject of
the conespondence from the County Commissioners previausly provided to you.
C. Discussion of the continuing implementation of regional collaboration pursuant
to Caunty Wide PlanninQ Policy Topic 2. Joint Planning Within Urban Growth Areas. O The discussion in the tech.nieal update relating to this is attached as Eachibit 2. Other
related documents include the MotiQn Recommending, Joint Planning for Existine Urban
Growth Areas dated January 18, 2006 (Exhibit 3); and the Motion to accept the progosed
Joint Pla,nning Aereement as a T'emplate, December 20, 2006 (Exhibit 4).
~
3
I '
Exhibft 1
~ Draff 4-44-08
_ .
Draft Policies
County Wide Planning Policies
Triggers Mandating UGA Review
Includes revisions per 3/14/08 SCEO meeting
Strikethrough and Underline Version
Mandated Review of Countv-wide UGA
16. The Urban Growth Area boundaries shall be fevi6ed reviewed at least every fwe
ten years to_accommodate the succceedinq twentv vears of proiected arowth, as
reQUired bv RCVV 36. 70A. 130(3)
,
' ' . The County Commissioners shall
' initiate the review process approximately eRs three years prior to the ten €we-year
~ anniversary date. This process shall re-evaluate population allocation, land
; quantity analysis and urban service delivery. Any jurisdiction through its
~ representative on the Steering Committee of Elected Officials may request that the
, Board of County Commissioners initiate a review of the Urban Growth Area
; boundaries prior to the scheduled time.
Triqqers for Review of the UGA
17. Review of the Urban Growth Area shall be required when: ~
~
a. Poqulation qrowth within the UGA (cities plus unincoroorated UGA combined)
equals or exceeds fiftv percent of the additional population capacitv estimated
for the UGA at the start of a twenty vear planninq period; or
b. Population qrowth within a city and its assiqned, unincoraorated UGA eQUals or
exceeds f'rftv percen# of the addi#ional population raqacitv estimated for the citv
and its assianed UGA at the start of a twentv vear planninct period.
^ c. Population qrowth within all UGAs that have not been assigned to a cities
e4uals or exceeds fiftv percent of the additional population capacitv estimated
for the unassiqned UGAs at the start of a twentv vear planninq period.
/
i
The start of the twenty year planninq period is defined as the initial adoption date of
the comprehensive alan or the adoption date of a UGA update as reauired under
~ RCVIJ 36.70A.130(3).
The above review shall be consistent with the reauirements of RCW.36.70A and
the Countvwide Planninq Policies, and shall incoroorate:
• an updated qopulation capacitv and land Quantitv anatvsis usinq the most
recent residential capacity estimates and assumqtions: and
■ an evaluation of land use and capital facilities to determine land use and
caqital facilitv needs within the existinp UGA and anv proposed UGA
expansion area.
' OraR 4-14-08
~
18. Review of the Urban Growth Area to consider additional commercial or industrial
land shall be reQUired when:
a. Commercial or industrial land consumption within the UGA (cities plus
unincorporated UGA combined) equals or exceeds fiftv percent of the
developable commercial or industrial land suqplv within the UGA at the start of
the twentv year planninq period; or
b. Commercial or industrial land consumption within a citv and its assiqned,
unincorporated UGA equals or exceeds fifty percent of the developable
commercial or industrial land supply within the citv and its assiqned,
unincorqorated UGA at the start of the twentv year planninq period.
c. Commercial or industrial land consumption within all UGAs that have not been
assiqned to cities eauals or exceeds fiftv percent of the developable
commercial or industrial land supplv within the unassiqned UGAs at the start of •
the twenty year planninq periOd.
~ The start of the twent year lannin eriod is defined as the initial ado tion date of
the comprehensive plan or the adoption date of a UGA update as required under
RCW 36.70A.130(3).
The above review shall be consistent with the reauirements of RCIN.36.70A and
the Countvwide Planning Policies, and shall incflmorate:
■ the most recent commerciallindustrial capacitv estimates and assumptions;
and ■ an evaluation of land use and capital facilities to determine land use and
capital facilitv needs within the existina UGA and anv proposed UGA
expansion area.
194-7. Individual jurisdictions may consider UGA revisions as a part of their annual
~T Comprehensive Plan Amendment process. All proposed amendments will be
~ reviewed in the following sequence and as depicted in Chart 1; UGA/JPA
Amendment Process.
• Conditionally approved amendments must be forwarded to the Steering
Committee of Elected Officials. The Steering C.ommittee shall consider the
amendments at a public hearing and then forward a recommendation to the
Board of County Commissioners. The Steering Committee shall consider
cumulative effects of all UGA proposals in making their recommendation.
O
. ' OraR 4-14-08 '
• The Steering Committee of Elected Officials will review Urban Grovvth Area
changes resulting from adoption of subarea plans and/or Comprehensive Plan `
Amendments for all jurisdictions once a year.
• The Board of Commissioners will consider the Steering Committee's UGA
recommendations at a public hearing. The Board of County Commissioners
shall consider cumulative effects of all UGA proposals in making their decision.
Urban Growth Area revisions must be approved and adopted by the Board of
County Commissioners.
UGA/JPA Amendment Process
,
UGi41JPA S,C'EO
MWM* BOCC
Ameridm Recommendation Approv
Chart 1: UGA / JPA Amendment Process
~
I
. ~
Exhibit 2
PlannJng Technica! Committee
0
Statutory Requirements and Efforts to Date Statutory Requirements
Comprehensive Plan Text Update
The Revised Code of Washington Chapter RCW 36.70a. 1 30(4)(b) requires periodic
review of city and county comprehensive plans and development regulations to ensure
the plan and regulations comply with the requirements of the Growth Nlanagement Act.
The required completion date for Spokane County's update was December 1, 2006.
Spokane County completed an update to its Comprehensive Plan text and development
regulations on March 13, 2007 to comply with the update requirement (BoCC res. # 07-
0208). This update did not consider proposed map amendments or expansion of the
UGA boundary.
UGA Expansion and Comprehensive Plan Map URdates .
The Revised Code of Washington Chapter RCW 36.70a. 1 30(3)(a) requires review of
- UGAs and the densities permitted in both the incorporated and unincorporated portions
of each urban growth area at least every ten years. The UGAs are required to be
considered and adjusted, if necessary, to ensure accommodation of urban growth for the
next 20 years. The County's Comprehensive Plan was initially adopted on November 5, ,
2001 (BoCC res. # 01-1059). Under state law, a review of the UGA must occur before
November 5, 2011. ~ The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPPs) under Policy Topic 1, Urban Growth Areas,
requires, under Policy 16, that the UGA shall be comprehensively reviewed at least
every five years following the initial adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The Steering
Committee has been considering revision to Policy 16 and has established a
subcflmmittee to make recommendations. Discussions have c4nsidered altering the
current five year review period and making it consistent with the 10-year interval
prescribed by state law, provided that triggers are added to require more frequent review
should the region experience rapid population growth. The Steering Committee has
scheduled a public hearing on this issue for May 21, 2008. If this policy is recommended
by the Steering Committee to the Board of County Commissioners, a public hearing and •
final adoption by resolution with the County Commissioners would be required.
Reglonal Collaboration
The Countywide Planning Policies require regional collaboration and coordinated planning efforts. The CWPPs, Policy Topic 2, ,lornt Planning within Urban Growth
Areas, states the following:
Spokane County and each jurisdiction must plan JointJy in the establishment of Urban
Growth Areas (UGAs) and for future acfivify within fhose areas. RCW 36.70A.020
(Planning Goals), GoaJ # 11, states, °Encourage the invoJvement of citizens in the pJanning process and ensure coordinatFon between communitres and jurrsdretions to
reconcrle conffrcts°. RCW 36. 70A.100 (Comprehensive Plans, Must be Coorrlinafed)
sfates, °the comprehensrve plan of each counfy or city thaf is adopted pursuant to RCIN
36.70A.040 shall be coordinated with, and consistenf ►nrifh, the comprehensrve plans
adopted pursusnt to RCW 36.70A.040 of other counties or cities with which the county or .
O city has, in part, common borders or related regional issues. ° Finally, RCW ~
36.70A.210(3)(0 (Countywide Planning PoJicies), states thaf fhe Countywide Planning
PoJicles must address "polrcies forJoint county and city planning wrthin urban growth
areas."
May, 2008 . 7
Planning Technical Gommittee
The following policies are also included in Policy Toprc 2, Joint P/anning within Urban
Growth Areas:
POL/ClES
1. Thejoint plannirrg process should:
a. lndude a!I jurisdfctions adjacent to the Urban Growth Area and Specia/ Purpose
Distticts that will be affecfed by the eventua/ transference ofgovammentaJ
services.
b. Recognize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation areas for cities.
C. Ensure a smooth transrtion of servrces amongst ezisting rrwnlcrpalities and
emergfng communities.
d• Ensure the ability to expand ur6an govemmentat services and avoid land use
barriers, to exQansion; and
e• Resolve issues ragarding how zoning, subdivision and other land use approvals
in designated Joint planning areas wrlJ be coordlnated.
2. Joint planning may be accomp!lshed pursuant to an interlocal agreement entered info
between and/or among jurisdretrons anc!/or special purpose drstricts.
Comprehensive Plan and UGA Update Efforts to Date
Various levels of public participation and analysis have occurred related to the UGA
expansion and Comprehensive Plan updates. These have occurred at the regional level
through the Steering Committee and at the county and city level.
- ;
Steerinv Committee • ' . 1
The Steering Committee, as required by the Countywide Planning Policies, has reviewed '
population forecasts and allocations and has made recommendations to the Board of
County Commissioners. The Board of County Commissioners (BoCC), on May 23,
2006, established for "planning purposes" a 20-year population allocation for the years
2006 to 2026 (BoCC res. 06-0438) (see Table 5).
Public P1~rticipation
The BoCC adopted a public participation ptan outlining the needs for public participation
throughout the UGA update process on Octobet' 17, 2006 (BoCC res. # 06-0869). This
plan references and relies on the adopted Public Participation Guidelines that have
formed the basis for past public participation efforts (BoCC res. # 98-0788). The public
participation guidelines were adopted to meet the GMA requirement for public
participation (RCW 36.70A.035, 36.70A.140). .
Spokane County and a number of cities in the County have held public work shops and
. have invited comment and requests related to the UGA update. Spokane County has
received over 300 commentslrequests related to the UGA update. Many of the non-
metro cities in the County have completed or are near completion of their update to their
comprehensive plans and UGAs, including Cheney, Deer Park, and Roclcford. Liberty
Lake has concluded their update process as contained in Liberty Lake resolution #N007-
106 and its population allocation for the next 20 years is planned to be accommodated
within its corporate boundaries. .
Screenina Criteria ~
The BoCC adopted screening criteria on August 8, 2006 (BoCC res # 06-714) to provide '
guidance in the consideration of potential UGA expansion areas. The screening criteria
May, 2008
8
Plannrng Technlca! Commr'ttee
O
considers comprehensive planning, land use/zoning, service and utility provision,
transportation impacts, environmental features and public input. Potential County UGA
areas were evaluated by County staff using these screening criteria. That evaluation was utilized by the Planning Technical Committee in their development of the potential
UGA study areas. ,
State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
Spokane County has employed consultants to provide guidance on the requirements of
SEPA and to assist in developing a SEPA process appropriate for the Comprehensive
Plan and UGA update. A number of discussion papers have been produced addressing
the SEPA procedural requirements and altematives for environmental review. The
Planning Technical Committee is recommending a SEPA/GMA integrated EIS as the
appropriate environmental process. Cost sharing and resource allocation to accomplish
the environmental analysis for updating the UGA has been considered by the Steering
Committee. The Board of County Commissioners commrtted staff and funding to the
regional planning effort for the environmental analysis and capital facilities analysis at its
strategic planning meeting on February 27, 2008. The County Commissioners requested
in-kind assistance in a letter sent to metro area elected officials on April 8, 2008. (See
Appendix for correspondence).
Planninp Technica! CommittEe
A Planning Technical Committee began a collaborative work process on this study in
April 2007 and again in January 2008 and in consultation with the Stee(ing Committee
O and the Sub-Committee of the Steering Committee. The Planning Technical Committee
advocates a cflordinated regional approach, consistent with RCW 36.70A and WAC 365-
195-335, in the metropolitan area for the UGA update planning effort. The Technical
Committee includes Planners from Spokane County, City of Spokane, City of Spokane
Valley, Liberty Lake, Millwood, Ainway Heights and the Boundary Rev,iew Board for
Spokane County. The regional planning effort was addressed by the Steering
Committee of Elected Officials on May 29, 2007 with the Steering Committee formally
recommending a regionally collaborative environmental planning process at that
meeting.
The Planning Technical Committee's approach is to encourage a collaborative
development of UGA alternatives by the use of shared information and coordinated
public outreach. This coordinated, multi-jurisdictional approach is supported by the
Countywide Planning Policies, and specifically, under Policy Topic 1 for Urban Growth
Areas (UGAs); Urban Policy 5 which states:
5. The Steerrng Commitfea shall analyze each jurrsdiction s proposed
UrbBn Growth Area (UGA) through the use of a multi furisdretrona!
plannTng team and make recommendations to the Board of Counfy
Commissfoners for Urban Growth Area (UGA) adoption or revisron.
-4 Non-Metro Cifies
The small cities and towns lying outside the metropolitan area have undergone
UGA planning efforts. These efforts will be considered separately because many
~ of the efforts are completed and ready for review by the Steering Committee and
Board of County Commissioners. The June, 2007 agenda of the Steering
Cammittee included a workshop to review the non-metro UGA proposals. The
Steering Committee held public a public hearing on August 15, 2007 and
May, 2008 9
continued the hearing on September 19, 2007 to receive public comment on the
non-metro cities and towns. The Steering Committee recommended approval of
the Deer Park, Rockford, and Cheney UGA proposals to the Board of County
Commissioners. Medical Lake will bring its UGA proposal to the Planning
Technical Committee and the Steering Committee at a later date. ~
May, 2008 10
Exhibit 3 ,o .
(As amended and approved by the Steering conlmittee on January 1 Sth, 2006) . ,
MOTION RECOMIvfENDING JOINT PL,ANNNING FOR EXISTIING URBAN
GROW"TH AREAS AND FURTHER RECOMNIENDIlNG THAT JOINT PLANiNING
AGREEMEN'TS SHOULD BE IN PLACE PRIDR TO APPROVAL OF FiTrURE '
URBAN GROWTH AREAS
Whereas, the Growth 1Vlanagement Steering Comnuttee of Elected Oificials (Steering
Committee) has formed a sub-committee to review issues surrovnding joint planning and
urban growth areas; and Whereas the subcommittee has met on the lOth of August, 2005 and 9th of September,
2005 to discuss these issues; amd Whereas, the Steering Committee recognizes that urban development without joint
planxii.ng znay result in uvfuuded impacts to adjacent jurisdictions as well as inconsistent
- developnzent standards in areas where future annexation is possible; and
Whereas, the Steering Gonwiiite.e recognizes that a nunzber of UGA's are adjacent to a
~ single jurisdictions and joint planninR would clearly be appropriate beiween Spol:..ane
County and t]iat jurisdiction; and
aVhereas, the jurisdictaons ftiu-ther recognize that other UGA's ntay impact both Spokane
County aud more than one tnwoicipal jurisdiction rcguiring joint planuing between all
affected jurisdictions; and . •
Whereas, the jurisdictions recognize that tying the issue of joint plann.ing agreements to
the issue of future annexation has resulted i.n disagreements as to specific appLications of
the law and sigmficant conflicts over future revenues with the end result being a
collective inability to draft and £izal,ize necessary joiut plg r+r+i ng agreenzents; and
Wliereas, the Steering Committee wish's to separate, witliout prejudice to auy
jurisdiction, the issue of fuiure annexations and the legal authority and right to pursue
such annexations from the issue of joint plarmiug to facilita.te the draftinj and execution
of joiia.t plaiuiing agreements;
Now, Therefore, the Steering Committee recornuends the following:
1. That all jurisdictions immediately begin the process of drafting and finali;_ina joint
planning agreements for exishng Urban Crrawth Areas. Areas where a sin.gle
municipality and Spoka.ne Coumty are the interested jurisdictions should be conipleted
within 6 months of passage of this motion. Areas wk►ere two or more municipal,ities have
an interest shall Antlun 6 months of passage of this motion idenfiify the zones where
t common interests lie and within 12 nsonths of passage of this motion complete and execute a joint planning agreement. It is understood that these in.itial agreements may
not be coinprehensive or identify and resolve all joint planni.ug issues but shauld address
. at a naa.niinum the issues of transportation inipacts and design standards. It is intended ,
that tlle parties continue to review and revise these agreements as needed.
2. Tliax, notwithstandiug language contai.ned in the County-Wide Plann.ing Policies for
Spokane County, Glossary Countywide planni.ng Policy Terms de5ning "Joi.nt-Plannung '
Areas", wluch states: Joint Planning Areas - areas d¢signated as Urbam Growth Areas assigned to .
a city ar towa for fn4ure urban development but Iocated in the
muWcorporated coubty where a coordinmted plann.ing proeess between the .
catie9, towns and the County will be conducted." at page 47
The adoption of a joint plauuing agreement shall not be considered as evidence in support
of or in opposition to, the future an.nexation of any specific azea nor shall any jurisdiction.
enteriug into such an agreement waive any right to appeal and/or to piarsue or oppose
annexation efforts or any other cause of action available under state or federal law unless
specifically restricted by the term.s of auy such aDreement.
3. That further, prior to final approval of any future extension of Urban Growtli
Boundaries Spokane Couni}, require that a joint planui.ng agreement be executed between ~
jurisdictions that are deemed to be affectEd by reasonable modeliuc, standards.
,
• 4. It is recommeuded tllat appropriate dispute resolution procedures are identified by thE , .i
County Commissioners.
• .
- Exhibit 4
~ . DRAFT ~ .
~ NiINUTES OF THE
- GR0INTN MANAGEMENT
STEERING C01411MiTTE'E OF ELECTED OFFfCIALS
' December-20, 2006 .
The meeting of the Growth Managsment Steering Committee of Elected Officials was called to- order by
ChaiRnan Matthew Pederson at 9:13 a.m. on December 20, 2006 in SPokane Transit Authority's
second floor Board Room at 1230 West Boona Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206.
VOTING MEaRBCRS PRESEtdT:
Bob Apple, Council Member, City of Spokane, Voting
Helen Cragun, Council IVlember, City of Deqr Parlc, Votrng Alfemate
Ed dChudc° Croccett, Council Member, Town of Latah, Votind . Michael DeVleming, Council Member, City of Spokane Valle~r, Voting
AI French, Council Memb2r, City of Spokane, Voting
Nancy ~IlicLaughlin, Council Memb?r; Cjty of Spokane, Voting=
Todd Rllielke, Commissioner, Spo'k'ans County, Vo2ing
~ Richard Munson, City of Spokane Valley, Voting~
Matthew Pederson, Mayor, City of Airway Heiglits, Voting -Chaie
Steve Peterson, Mayor, Ciry of Liberty'L`ake, Votirig . . .
Mark Richarcl, Spokarfe.County Commissione'r; Voting_
Wendy VanOrman,, Council ~Vlember, City of Liberty Lake, Voting Altemate
NON-VOTING MEMBERS;PRESEN'T:
Bart Haggin, Unincorporated -Spokane.CounYq;
Sharon Colby; Ei. ~ District #3 ' . .
STAFF FRESENT: • ' Parnzla Knutsen, Assistant Director, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning
John Pederson, Assistarrt: Director, Spokane County Department of Building and Planning
Dave Hubert, Spokane County Deputy Prosecuting Attorney '
Interested parties as shown on the attached coQy of the sign-in sheet.
1. Action on Niinu4es of Idovember 15, 2UD6 Mr. DeVleming moved to approve the minutes of November 15, 2006. Mr. French seconded the
motion and motion passed unanimously. ~ .
. . 1
2. . Action on DraSt Interlocal Agmernents
Chairrnan Pederson advised that the Steering Committes had been presented with *a draft
Interlocal Agreement prapared by the City of Spokane Valley for consideration. Mr. Munson
commended the City of Spokane on the changes tliey submitted to the Committee. AAr. French
advised that the City of Spokane staff reviewed the document submitted by the City of Spokane
Valley and outfined the changes proposad.
Motion Mr. French moved that the Committee substitute the -documen't as amended by the City of
Spokane for the document that was presented and prepared by the City of Spokane Valley. Mr.
Munson seconded the motion. Chairman Pederson asked if Mr. French was referring to the document dated 12-4-06. Mr. French
advised that he was referring to the one dated 12-6-06. Mr. Mielke asked'for a oomparison that
. shows the changes, Mr. French stated that the draft that showed all the comparative language was .
emailed on Tuesday, but oifered a red-lined copy lie had on hand.
Mr. Mielke expressed concem regarding the phrase °consisfent-with the Cify's comprehensive plan
and development standards° in Item 2 Intent, page 3,: Mr. Mielke stated that he feels this
statement allows for one City's rules to:oveRide the rules and ordinances of the other jurisdiction
. .
involved. He also expressed concem~ regarding the language °fhe Parfies shall require (or
recommend, as the cass may b6)- construction°-qf, the transportatrori improvements necessary to
mttigate transporfation impacts identified,in the TIAr::,." in Item 5,1`r~nsportation, paragraph b. Mr.
Munson asked for legal opinion on this statement;: Mr. Richman,; Attorney for the City of Spokane,.,
advised that the language•was for clarification,and'compliance with the Growth Management Act.
Mr. Richman advised fh:e Committee that this draft Interlocal Agreement is consistent with other
Joint Planning Agreements in VClashington State. IUIr. Ricfiman advised that if there is a confilict between the County's Comprehensive Plan and the City's Comprehensive Plary, the City's
Comprehensive Plan prevails in a Joint Planning.Area.
Mr. Connelly suggested that -"and consistenr and, °partres° b- added in brackets as altematives for
the Inferlocal Agreement templats. He rerriinded the Committee that this is an issue for the Cities
and County to discuss jn the future and that this Intedocal Agreement is merely a template.
. Comrnissioner Richard noted that 1tern 3, Applicability, represents a major change in policy. He
siat'ed that this language neflects the'notion that the Cities will be looking to mitigate the impacts of
' those areas that are contiguous with their boundaries and stated he dQes not find this acceptable.
Mr. Richman advised that the intent was to attach maps outlining the Urban Growth Areas on a
case by case basis. Mr. Richard asked if the word•°contiguousn was to be interpreted to mean
intemal and extemal. Mr-. Richman advised 'rt was intended to show a common boundary; that an
Urban Growth arear could extend on both sides of that common boundary:
Discussion moved to Item 5, Transportation, paragraph b; °...payment of money in lieu thereof...:to
the 1urisdretron whose transportation system rs thereby impacted.° Mr. Pederon stated that he feels this issue is subject to individual agreement between the jurisdictions involvzd in the
Interlocal Agreement and suggested that the word "template° be added to the btle of the document, . ~
Mr. Munson made a friendly amendment to add the word "template° to the document. Mr. French, ~
accepted the friendly amendment. Mr. Munson asked that fiiendly amendments also be made to
Item 2, Intent, page 3, paragreph one, to read °...compatible and consistent with ttie City's
2 ,
10 Pprties compaeherrsr've plar~ ar~d de~refopmer~t sfar~dards, ~and on Ifem 9, Applicability, remove
the statement Wh+ch are corrtrguous to the Ci#y's corporate baundarres.,.1j. Mr. French acceptsd
the friendEy arrtandment. - Mr, French restated his early motion at the request of the clerlc to substitutia the drafk 1nterlocal
Agreement submitteci by tiie Cify of Spokana VaEley with tfne docurnent that waa amended by the
Cf.ty of Spokane and dated 12-06-06 as adraft-template, Motian seconded by Mr. EU+unson. 1lo#e
was S to 3, with Mr. FedeTson, fNr. Gl+lunson, Ms. McLaughlEn, 14r. DaVlerrring, 1VOr. French, Mr.
G ainer, Mr. App1e, Mr: Crockett voting in favor and Camm kssioner M kelke, Gommission er Richafd
and.Mr_ Peterson vating agairist. - - , fUlr. Nlielke advised #he Committee trat his conc.ems !ie wit'h. the statemant, "to insure the
cfevelopment standards app1Eed within the UGA are consi.stent wikh the Parties deveioprnent
stan[fards.A -
3. Report from Steering C orramittee Sub commit#ee an Updating C ourt+jwide P [arrnEn g PoIMCies .
N1r. FfencM presented the rer.omrrEendations of th#i ~ ubcommiftee on Falicies 16 a n d 17 that deal
With tha fiming of upda#es to Compiehensive Land Use PGarr§ ind Urban Growtli Area boundaiies,
Mr. French advised that discussion cen#4red on tifrtatable$Jprbeginntng and completing work on
the L.kGA baundaries. Nor. FEench a6 ' 4ed that the Su66 ornmitee was not able to reach a
consensus on Policy iB and tv0o:.:aptlo,ns waee presWed for the Steering Cornmiftea's
' consEderMion. Consenstts was r~~cl~e'd:onPolicy 17 and the redom~nenda#ion was presented to
fhe Steering Commiftee, Mr. French advised thaf currerttly "updates to the UGA and _
_ Comprehensiva Plans ere. done on a fiA-y_i~ar cy.cGe. The=.Subcomrniftee recommended changing
this to aten-yaar cycie (Option 1) ar a severj-y~a~, cycie (pfi a,ra 2), Mr.- French advised fhaf fhere
is a Got of time, energy and ~`esourcas rec~uited to complet~ i~is work and that he recDrnmends the
updates be done an a'teri-year cycle. _
Mr. Bart Haggih - ftdvrsed the S - teering Comrnittbe that the five year cycle wa s developed dua to
rasistanoe to fhe Grrnruth Map aigement Act. M r._;~ jgrn stated nis support for a#en-yeai t9me frarne .
for t€~e UGP~ updates. . .
nlJr. F-rench outlined Fl-olicy 17 for the Steeiing Committee. He noted that each indivfcEuai jur+sdiction
can request annual UGA expansion, if_i~ecessary.
Mr. Munson outlined the second. optaon proposed by the Subcommitkee. Mr. McGofrnick,
expressed conr.em fhat a ten-year cycle was too long. Fie advised the Comrnif#es that wAin a
ten-year period, each jurisdicfion has already gone through fv,ro OFM Populatian projeffiDns and
that th ose prajections are used by severa1 service providers who may have sh or#er tirne frames for
developii-ig their sen+ices._
Mr. Nrunsan sum rnanzed the sevenmyear versus the ten-year proposals and recomrnended the
commikiee acoept Option 2.
i Mr. Rederson noted that fhere was nat consensus at th e Suboommittea Eew+el a n d he advoca#ed for
' the f[ve-year update planning cycle. He noted that this is a fiva-year update anly and no# an
overhaul of entire Compreherrsive Plana. Mr. Pedeison "ed his feeling that a ten-year planning
cyd e kvas too [ang a timeframe. Mr. Pederson noted that DFM projeffic ns are provided evefy five
years and pmvide a growth marker far planning and he feels a five-year update cyde meets the
needs of the majority of fhe sma[I ci#ies in the caunty. ~
3 .
Mr. French advised that comprehensive, long-term planning must be done. He informed the
Committee that Ariington, 1Jirginia set aside 1600 acres for wastewater treatment facilities for their
community in the 1880's. IUIr. Haggin stated that Spokane County is out of step with other jurisdictions in fhe State who use a
. ten-year cycle. He suggested the Steering Committee look at other counties in Washington to*see
. how they are dealing with this issue.
Mr. Mielke asked the Committee to consider Option 1'as it is consisterit State Statutes and he feels
tiiat a five year cyGe will encumber jurisdictional staff unnecessarily. Mr. Connelly stated that what
adverssly impacts aties and counties is development ttiat is not regionally coordinated and
planned. P+llr. Connelly stated that the five-year review forces regional planning earlier rather than
later. •
{Uir. Richard asked steff whether Spokane County is the ariomaly in using a five-year UGA planning
cycle. Ms. Knutsen informed the Committes that she had raviewed other counties in the stata and
found a range of update cycles, ranging from annually to ten-year cycles. Ms. Knutsen advised that
Spokane County's goal was to beoorrie more•c,flnsisfent with Statz law. She advised that item 16
does provide jurisdictions the ability to request the County Commissioners to initiate the UGA
boundary review process. Ms. Knutsen, stated that Option 1 allows County staff to complete the
numerous other planning funcfiions required of them and that County resources are limited.
Nir. Richard moved to continue discussion on#his issue to the next nteeting. Mr. Murison seconded
and motion passed unanimously. -
~ .
. . .
4. Set Agenda for Next Meeting The next meeting of th.e GMA Steering Committee was set for January 17, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. to be
held in the STA Board Room. • Chairman Matthew Pedersoii adjoumed the meeting at 11:01 a.m.
. ~
Approved: -
. Chairman Matthew Pederson
- Date:
Debbie Decorde, Interim Clerk , . ;
4
0 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 5/20/08 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ~ new business ❑ public
hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Transportation Financial Gap Analysis: Financial Options and
Facts
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: At a recent meeting of the City Council, elected
officials have engaged in a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)
analysis of the local transportation system that described the factors both favorable and
unfavorable toward accomplishment of the Council's strategic transportation objeGtive. The
stated objective is: To provide residents and businesses with a phvsically and financiallv sound
local transportation (street) svstem that meets their needs now and in the future. The C'rty
Council subsequently undertook an exercise to identify its six-year transportation goals. •
~ BACKGROUND: This discussion item presents the City Council with an opportunity to identify
the shortfall in providing for adequate basic street maintenance and for initiating a pavement
preservation program, often referred to as a Street Master Plan. Secondly, the Council can
engage in a discussion intended to identify various funding tools and methodologies available
for use in meeting the challenge of assuring quality street conditions and making timely and
cost-effective infrastructure investments to stem gross deterioration of the street network and
avoid excessive costs for repairs in the future. This discussion is the third step progressing
toward the.development of a strategic transportation financial plan (STFP). CuRently, the
Council anticipates that Jull 22 is the date it will give direction to staff on the composition of the
STFP.
OPTIONS: 1. Identify the disparity between transportation system maintenancefimprovement
costs and revenue. 2. Give the matter further thought. 3. Choose to defer discussion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: PROPOSED ACTION: None at this time.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: To be determined
STAFF CONTACT: Dave Mercier
ATTACHMENTS: Council SWOT results
Council Six-YQar Transportation Goals
o
City Council Transgorta6on Financial SWOT Analysis (with staff inAut added*)
~ April 29, 200$
Obiective: To provide residents and businesses witb a physically and financially sound Iocal
transportation (streEt) system that meets their needs now and in the future.
VOTFS: STRENGTHS:
6 Good cunent conditions
6 Lack of congestion
6 We have a plan (street master plan and TlP)
4 Good access to business
3 Safe streets
2 Exccllent contractors-street maintenance
2 Couplet
2 Excellent commuter system (I-90)
1 Strong east/west system
1 Clean '
1 Some excellent bike lanes
1 Good street signs •
p Reasonable grid system
~ 0 Excellent staff and council
0 Good connectivity to freeway
p Good sight distanee '
~ Reputation for long-range fiscal planning and no previous tax increases
VOT'ES WEAKNESSES
7 Lack of public perception funding need 6 Lack of sustainable public funding
6 i..ack of funding for maintenF►nce, street preservations, new development
5 Today's good conditions mask tomorrow's (future) needs
4 faili.ng intersections
4 Oldcr roads in growth arcas
1 Inadequate emergency access
I . Fublic doesn't understand crumbling roads (deterioration)
1 Premature deterioration
1 Poor north/south connectors (couplet) '
1 Business roads not aesthetically pleasing
1 Dead-end Appleway
0 Miles of road without curb
O p Laek of continuity of design
p Was not a cohesive comprehensive street plan
p Inadequate roads in PUD, cul-de-sacs
p Sprague east of University
1~.SV-FS11Userslcbainbridge\agendapacket 05-06-081SWOT results with StaffInput re 4-29-08 study session.doc
0 Dishman-Mica
0 Not adequate for truck traffic
0 C.ack of resouroes to independently identify traffic situations on a routine basis
0 At grade railroad crossings
0 Need to defer street maintenance and preservation
# Lack of sufficient bike lanes * Lack of sufficient mass transit (light-rail, etc.)
* Many roads in bad condition, ruts in road (Sprague), road shoulders brealcing away
" Incorporation conecpt that existing revenue structure was adequate
3 Allowing the streets to deteriorate to an unsafe condition
~ Lack of resources for planning and grant applications
* Allowing the streets to deteriorate to an unsafe condition
L,ack of resources for planning and grant applic.ations
* Premature deterioration of neNver streets
* We have a mastcr plan but still a draft. Also, needs to be supplemented with re,3der
friendly information for the public.
VOTES OPPORTUNTI'IES
7 Work with state legislature to develop new tools/funding
6 To establish an ongoing funding souree
4 To implement the street master plan
r ~
4 Transportation Benefit District, LID, Taxes: sales, utility, real estate, B&O, property,
3 To develop unique city/private nrojects
2 To maintain at a lower cost then if we were in dire straights
2 To develop exteiisive trail system .
2 Success in gaining/leverage grant dollars
1 Press forward with bridging the valley
1 To work with other agencies to develop unique transportation system
1 Develop system that is environmentally friendly
0 Options for bike/pedestrian high public awareness potcntial supporters
~ To gain support for optimal maintenance vs. needing to repair our streets.
* To demonsteate long term savings associated with maintenance
* To provide safe and well maintained streets
• Review existing revenues that could be dedicated to the Street Fund
* We are a developing City, presents unique opportunities.
* Opportunity to acquire good mass transit system (light rail, etc.)
\1SV-PSI1Userslcbainbridgelagendapackct 05-06-081SWOT results with Stafflnput re 4-29-08 study session.doc
VOTES THI2EATS UEMS COUNCIL CAN IlVFLUENCF
~ 6 Negative reaction to spending dollars
6 Cutting services N1
5 Road deterioration .
4 Council inaction ~
3 Publ ic inaction/complaccncy
2 Increase in demand for maintenance
2 Inadequate communication with public
1 Asking for moee money ~
1 Adverse affect on economic gro~Nth
1 Reduced current funding
1 Policy inconsistency ~
1 Gradualism
0 Lack of concurrency ~
0 Being "out front" in Spokane Valley
0 Under-estimating public reaction to need ~ .
Competing with other entities for public dollars
' Increases in accidents resulting from inadequate mainlenance
~ Higher financial risk to the City resulting from inadequate maintenance
* Reduction in State/Federal grant funding
~
LEGI;ND
staff input
threats manageable by City Council
o .
11SV-FS11Userslcbainbridgelagendapacket 05-06-081SWOT results with Staff Input re 4-29-08 study session.doc
Goals Ideas from May 6, 2008 Council Study Session:
Obiective: To provide residents and busincsses with a physically and financially sound local
transportation (street) system that meets their needs now and in the futwe.
VOTES:
7 Establish a sustainable funding option for (1) maintenanee, and (2) preservation
5 implement a plan for long-term maintenance and preservation
5 Develop an alternative plan based on actual revcnues
5 Seek to develop legislative alternatives
5 Identify the basis of taxpayer resistance; identify ways to fill the information gap
4 Establish public information program for funding needs over six years . 2 Establish timelines to accomplish goals
1 Utilize best practicc in thc expcnditures oFtransportation dollars
1 Council exercise increased level of knowledge and resolve
0 Examine funding alternatives
0 Plan-cut general fund services to generate dollars for street fund
0 Be aware of regional funding requirements 0 Maximize efficiency of road sta .ff
_ r..
` _
11SV-FSI1UserslcbainbridgelcbainbridgelMinuteslStudy Session 20081SWOT goals result from 05-06-08 study
session.doc
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of May 14, 2008; 3:15 p.m.
Ylease note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Mav 27, 2008 (no meeting, Memorial Day)
Jnne 3, 2008, Studv Sessioa 6:00 p.m. (due date Tuesday, May 271
1. Action ltcm: Second Reading Proposed Urdinance for Street Vacation - Karen Kendall (10 minutes)
Acdon Item: Modon: Consultant Selection City Center EIS - Greg MeCormick (10 minutes)
3. Action Item: Motion: Avista Llectric, Barker Road Bridge Project MOiJ - Steve Worley (10 minutes)
4. Action item: M1'[otion: Pool Construction Contingency Rudget - Mike Stone (10 minutes)
Valley I lospital Proccss Update Jud,\ Cole (.A<<ista) (20 minutcs)
6. Comp Plan Amendments Discussion - Greg McCormick (30 minutes)
7. Argonne and Indiana Road Discussion - Neil Kersten (15 minutes)
8. Broadway Ave Safety Project (re-stripping) - Steve Worley (15 minutes)
9. Solid Waste Franchise Update - Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
10. Transportation Benefit District Update - Cary Driskell (20 minutcs)
11. Info Only: Pines/Mansfield Contract Award - Steve Worley; Broadway Infraction data - Neil Kersten
12. Advance Agenda, Council Check-In, Gity Manager Check-in (10 minutes)
TOTAL MINUTES: 165 minutes
.Iunc 10, 2008. Regular MeetinQ. 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, June 21
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2009-2014 TIP [ 15 minutes]
2. Consent Agcnda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes, Storm Drainage Easement; [5 minutes]
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan - Greg McCormick [15 minutes]
4. Proposed Resolution Delegating Signature Authority for Utility MOU - Mike Jackson [10 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Approval of Barker Road Bridge/CH2MHill Contract Amendment - S Worley [5 min]
6. Admin Report: Customer Service Improvement PIans/Permit Process (CIP of PW) - Steve
Worley /Neil Kersten [20 minutes]
F.XECUTIVE SESSION [*estimated meeting: 70 minutes]
Saturdav, June 14: 9 a.m. to apnroz 3 p.m. CoanciUStaff Retreat (Dick Uenenny's Cabin)[due Mon, June 21
Tenlative Topics:
1) Updated Financia) Forecast (5) Shoreline MasterProgram (9) Brainstotming
2) Review 2008 Council Goals (6) City Center Initiative (10) Public Info Program
3) 2009 Council Goals (7) Law Enforcement Services (11) Info Item: Work Program
4) Transportation Funding (8) On-line permitting
June 17. 200$: No Meetint! or Studv Sessioo (June 17 - 20, AWC Annual Conference - Yakima)
June 24. 2008. Regular Meetine, 6:00 p.m. (due date Monday, June 161
l. Consent Agenda: Claims, PayTOll, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan - Greg McCormick [20 minutes]
3. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2009-2014 TIP - Steve Worley [15 minutes]
4. Motion Consideration: Sales Purchase Agreement - Mike Connelly/Scott Kuhta [ 15 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: PineslMansfield Contract Award - Steve Worley [5 minutes]
6. Info Only: Dept Reports
EXECUTIVE SESSION [#estimated meeting: 55 minutes]
DraR Advance Agenda 5/14/2008 3:19:14 PM Page 1 of 3
lulN l.'llliti, titudN "cssiun 0:011 ji.ni. [duc dute 11mid:iN,.lunc 23 ~
JulN ti ZIIU!i, Re(-,ul:ir INicctin,_,. f,:Ull p.m. ~duc d:itc N 1nn(1:►N. Junc 311~
t;
JulN 15, 200N, titu(lN tiessiuii b:Ull p.m. id ue date Mun<]a%, JulN
1. Comp Plan Amendment Quarterly Update - Greg McCormick (20 minutc, i
2. Street MasterPlan Update - Neil Kersten (30 minutes )
3. Splashdown Contract - Mike Stone (20 minutes)
4. Preliminary 2009 budget, revenueslexpenditures - Ken Thampson (20 minutcs)
TOTAL MINiJTES: 90 minutes
Julv 22. 2008, Reeular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, July 141
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2009 Revenues
2. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes [5 minutes ]
3. Admin Report: Property Tax Levy Ordinance Review - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
4. Admin Report: Tax I,evy Confirmation Urdinance Review - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
5. Admin Report: Collaborative Planning Options for UGAs - Kathy McClung [20 minutes]
6. Strategic Financial Plan - Dave Mercier [60 minutes ]
~ lnfo~ Onlv: ncc)t RcPc,rts ~*estimatecl meetin~!: 105 rninutcsJ
,lul-, 21>. 2008, Slu(l~ tic„ion o:fll1 p.m. ilur (1.11(. Nlmn, JulN 11
l. CollaUorative 1'lanning Uption, for UGAs 5usan Winchcll oi 13K13; and i3ill Cirimes Studio Cascade (GU r. ; i
AuQUSt 5, 2008. No Meeting lpresumed A`curonu( .Vr,i~ht Outl
AuQust 12, 2008. ReQUlar Meeting, 6:00 p.m. (dur datc nlondaN., aii(;usc 41
1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. Motion Consideration: Council Sets IIudget Hearings for Sept 9 and Dec 9- Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
3. Admin Report: Presentation of Prcliminary Budget - Dave Mercier [20 minutes]
4. Info Onl : De t Re orts ['"estimatcd meeting: minutesl
~
Ausust 19, 2008, Studv Session 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Aagust 11)
1. Sprague Appleway ltevitalization Plan (SARP) Discussion - Scott Kuhta (60 minutes)
2. Street Design Standards - Neil Kersten (60 minutes)
3. Outside Agencies present to Council - Ken Thompson (45 minutu,)
TOTAL MINUTES: 165 minute,
August 26. 2008. ReQular hieetin¢. 6:00 p.m. [due date Mouday, August 181
1. PUBLIC HEARING: SARP - Scott Kuhta [60 minutc~,'j
2. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes [5 minute~ 1
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting SARP - Scott Kuhta [20 minui
t Tnfn Onlv~ t)ert Rerc*rt: (*e.timated meetint,: RS minutc.j
I I..;i VI'..i:i,_:_ , - 1 _ , _ ,
Sept 2, 2008 (no meeting, Labor Day)
0 Sentember 9, 2008, Regular Meeting, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Sept 1J
1. PUBLIC HE4 A.RING: Proposed 2009 Budget - Ken Thompson [ 15 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payeoll, Minutes [5 minutes]
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting SA,RP - Scott Kuhta . [20 minutes]
4. First Reading proposed Ordinance Property Tax - Ken Thompson [10 minutes]
5. First Reading Proposed Tax Confirmation Ordinance - Kcn Thompson [10 minutes]
6. Admin Report: Airpart Overlay zone - Mike Connelly/Kathy McClung (20 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
September 16, 2008, StudY Session 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Sept 8J
Sentember 23, 2008, Reaular M.eetinQ, 6:00 n.m. [aue date Mnnday, Sept 151
1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes , [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Property Tax - Ken 7'hompson [10 minutes]
- 3. Second Reading Proposed Tax Confirmation Ordinance - Ken Thompson (10 minutes)
[*estimatetl meeting: minutes]
OTHER PENDIlqG AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Aquifer Protection/Water Conservation (Post Falls, Spokane) #
Budget 2009: 1219 & 12116, Hearing, ordinances etc
Ciry Center Report to Council Code Compliance Amendments (UDC)
Comp Plan Amend-Qrrrly Update ( Oct, Jan, April, July)
0 Comp Plan Update✓UGAJJPA
Fast Gateway Monument Structure #
General Election November 4 #
Graffiti Update #
impact Fce Request Central Valley School District
I"1' Specialist Classification Resolution
Joint Meeting w/City of Spokane (a Wed in July?):
#
Tentative topics: Joint Planning Efforts, Crime Check Proposal , Waste water treattnent, Impact fees
Law Enforcement Analysis
Law Enforcement Contract
J.egislative Agenda, tentative topics: Interoperability, Street utility;
DNR Lease (50130 year), 911 Funding, Greenacres Park Devclopment Funding Balance
Library Board Update #
NLC Meeting Nov 11-15, Orlando, Florida #
Northeast Housing Solutions City Membership '
Overweight/over size vehicle ordinance
Fublic hearinQ for State Performance Audit Report re Public Rccords: #(w/in 30 days of final report release)
Public Safety Presentation/'1'rends - Chief VanLeuven (20 minutes)
Records Management Contract/Update
Transportation Impacts
UDC Code Amendments
Use Agreement (Cary Driskell)
Transnortation BerieFt District (TBD) (J elun Julvl:
a. Establish ordinance; (b) set public hearing; (c) draft re5olulion; (d) bAllot Ianguage
O[# Awaiting action by others
* Does not include time for public comments.]
Draft Advancc Agenda 5114/2008 3:19:14 PM E'age 3 of 3
~Q° FIRE A<<F~- I
DEPARTMENT
~ 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99206-3627 •(509) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 6824125
www.spokanevalleyfire.com
Mike Thompson '
Chief
May 9, 2008
Honorable Mayor a.nd Council Members:
In March of 2006, representatives from most of the fire service agencies in Spokane County
came together to begin work on a draft Interlocal Cooperation Agreement pursuant to the
provisions of the Washington State Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 39.34, RCV) for
ambulance service. The intent was to collectively work towazds a single county-wide contract
. that would provide consistency, economy of scale and uniform regulatory and administrative
oversight for emergcncy ground medical ambulance services.
The Interlocal Agreement is a significant element in the process of achieving a county-wide
ambulance service agzeement. It establishes the purpose of the Agreement crcates an Ambulance
~ Service Board, sets forth the framework for the duties and responsibilities of the 8oard and the
authority and responsibilities of t,he Contract Adnunistrator.
All participating agencies are now in the process of txking it to their governing boards for
approval. It is anticipated that we will have all of thc necessary signatures by the end of May
2008. At that point we will be forming the Ambulance Service Board to finalize a draft request
for bid (RFB) that we have been working on simultaneously with the Interlocal. We expect to
send the RFB out to potential ambulance providers by August 2008, Arith a goal of having a
signed emergency ambulance service agreement by the end of 2008.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely, Mike Thompson
Fire Chief
O
DRAFT
~
Interlocal Caoperxtion Agreement for Ground Ambulance Service
1. PARTIES.
I.I. 1'he parties to this Agreement are: Spokane Valley Fire Department, Spokane County Fire
Frotection Districts 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10 and 13, and the Cities of Airway Heights, Cheney,
Medical Lake and Spokane, all municipal corForations of the State of Washington.
1.2. The parties may be generally referencsd in the singular or plural hereafter as "PLG" or
"PLGsy", wnich is derived from "Participating Local Government."
2. INTE1tLOCAL COOPERA'TION AGREEMENT.
2.1. This is an interlocal cooperation agreement established pursuant to the peovisions of the
Washington State Interlocal Cooperation Act (Chapter 3934, RCVI).
3. FINDINGS.
3.1. The PLGs find that when two or more contiguous local jurisdictions share the same ground
ambulance service system, a decision by one jurisdiction regarding the ground ambulance
service system may unavoidably impact the cost and/or quality of health care service delivery
in other jurisdictions.
3.2. The PLGs find that it is in the best interests of the public safety, health and welfare of their
. . respective citizens and constituents to enter into this Agreement to develop a process by
which they may, through joint action under this Agreemcnt, gant an ambulance service
contract to a single provider. This single provider to serve tiie needs of the public for
ambulance service and respond to medical ground ambulance service requests originating
within the combined designated geographical areas of the PLGs. Nothing in this Agreement .
shall be construed to provide for the granting of a monopoly or exclusive contract to the
extent prohibited by law.
4. PUI2PQSES.
4.1. 'fhe pwposes of th is Agreement are to:
a. Gain the advantages of consistency of ground medical ambulance service, economy of scale
and centralizcd disaster response planning and diroction;
b. Develop and recommend for adoption by all PLGs a contract ("Ambulance Service
ContracY) for emergency ground medical ambulance services w'►thin the designated
- combined geographical area of the PLGs;
c. Gain the advantages of uniform regulatory and administrative oversight over ground medicaJ
ambulance services as provided through the Ambulance Service Contract;
, d. Provide a process for other adjacent jurisdictions within Spokane County to become
participants (PLGs) in this Agreement. ~
Page 1 of 12
DRAFf
O 5. DEFiNITIONS.
5.1. Words and phrases used in this Agreement shall have the meanings attributed to tfiem in
RCW 18.73.030 unless a different meaning is plainly reyuired by the context.
5.2. "Adminislering PLG" means the entity responsible for employing the Contract Administrator and the entity having care and custody of the funds and property for the Cooperative's uses
and needs.
5.3. "Ambulance Service Board" or "Board" means a Board of PLG representatives as
established under this Agreement to provide policy guidance and direction to the Contract
Administrator resRecting administration of the Ambulance Service Contract. Represcntatives
as established in Section 7 of this agreement.
5.4. "Ambulance Service Contruct" means the contract aNvarded to the Ambulance Service
Contractor.
5.5. "Ambulance Service Corrtractor" or "Contractnr" means the firm or entiry providing services
under the Ambulaace Service Contract established pursuant to this Agecment. 5.6. "CCC" means the "Combinecl Communications Center" established by a scparate Interlocal
Cooperation Agreement.
5.7. "Contract Atlministralor" means the Fire Chief of the Administering PLG with responsibility
O to administer the Ambulance Service Contract on behalf of the Ambulance Service Board as
specified herein.
5.8. "Contrtrcl Service Area" means the combined designated geogaphic areas of the PLGs established as the service area under the Ambulance Serviee Contract.
5.9. "Cooper.alive" means the collective group of PLGs participating in this Agreement.
5.10. "Incident Volcanes" means the total number of incidents clispatched by the CCC to the
Ambulance Service Contractor.
5.11. "PLG" means a participating local govemment who is a party to this Ageement.
6. PLG PARTICll'ATION.
. 6.1. Public Ambulance Service, The PLGs participate in this Agreement in thcir capacities as public
ambulancc service providers for the purposc of group purchasing of ambulance services.
6.2. Approvals. The participation of each PI,G in the Cooperative is contingent on each PLG's final
approval of the Ambulanee Service Contract. If a PLG fails to approve the Ambulance Service
Contract with in 90 days of the date the Ambulance Service Board provides tfie PLG with notice
of a recommendation to approve the Ambulance Service Contract, it shall be considered to have
withdrawn from this Agreement,
O 6.3. Open Participation. Participation in the Cooperative is open to other governmental units in
Spokane County providing fire protection and EMS services provided (1) they are dispatched by
Page 2 of 12
DItAFT • .
the CCC, (2) the Ambulance Service Board approves thEir participation, and (3) the
governmental unit becomes pariy to this Agreement and approves any existing Ambulance
Service Contract.
6.4. Withdrawal. Any PLG may withdraw in the manner specified in Section 15 of this Agreement.
7. AMBULANCE SERVICE BOARD: CREATION AND STRUCTU1tE.
71. Creation. An Ambulance Service Baard is hereby created and is comprised of representatives of
the PLGs as constiiuted in accordance with this Section.
7.2. Representatives. The Flmbulance Service Boazd will be comprised of eight (8) representatives.
The 8 representatives on the Ambulance Service Board shall be the PLG Fire Chiefs or their
designees as defi.ned below. Each representative shall designate a person to act as an
authorized alternate in case of their absence or unavailability.. ,
7.3. Terms. Four Large PLG Group positions and four Small PLG Group positions shall be
determined as follows:
a. Larize PLG Group.
(i). Each of the four PLGs with the greatest average annual 911 ground ambulance transport
incident volume during the period January l, 2005 through December 31, 2007 shall
have one representative on the Ambulance Service Board, The terms of these four
representatives start on the effective date of this Agreement and expire llecember 31, 2010. Thereafter, the terms for Large PLG Group Board members shall be three years. -f
(u). By December 1, 2010, and every three years thereafter, thc Board shall determine the
four PLGs with the greatest average annual 911 gound ambulance transports measured
over tiie last thirty-six months, so L,arge PLG Group representatives can be named for
the ensuing three-year term starting the following January 1 st.
b. Small PLG Groun.
. (i). Four Ambulance Service Board representatives are to be selected by the remaining
PLGs as at-largc rcpresentatives for the Small PLG Group. The at-large representatives
shall serve two yeaz terms, except the first terms start at the time of selection and expire
December 31, 2009. (ii). The Chair of the Ambulance Service Board shall solicit nominations for the Small PLG
Group positions and administer their election. Thc Fire Chiefs, or their designees, of the
Small PLG Group have one vote each to elect those representatives and the four
~ representatives receiving the most votes shall be appointed. In the event of a tie for the
fourth posifion such tie shall be resolved by the toss of a coin.
(iii). For the first election for Small PLG Grou.p representatives, the Chair shall sfllicit
nominations and administer the election as soon as reasonably practicaJ. For years in
which the Small PLG Group terms expire, the Chair shall solicit nominations starting
October 1 of the year of the expiring term and administer the election so it is completed ~
~ Page 3 of 12
DRAFT
O by December 15 of tfiat year, allowing newly elected representatives to start their terms
January 1 of the following year.
7.4. One Representarive, Consecutive Terms, Other. _
a. No PLG shall have more than one representative on the Ambulance Service Board at any
time. There shall be no limit on die number of terms that may be served by a representative.
b. lf a Board member leaves employment with a PLG, that Board position becomes vacant.
c. If a Board position is vacated during a member's term, the position shall be filled for the
remainder of the term as soon as passible by the prescribed method of selection for the
position.
7.5. Quorum and Voting.
a. Each Ambulance Service Board member shall have one vote.
b. A quorum shall be one more than 500/o of the Ambulance Service Board membcrship. A
quorum shall be required for the Board to take action.
c. Actions are approved by simple majority except wiiere otherwise providcti.
d. A super majority shall be riwo-thirds of the total number of Board members.
O 7.6. Change of Board Compositioii. By unanimous consent of the Ambulance Service Board, the
composition of the Anbulance Service Board may be modified to not more than 12 members or
le,ss than five members, provided that in the event there are fewer than five PLCrs remaining as
parties to this Agreement, each PLG Fire Chief shall be a Board mcmber.
7.7. Chair of Board.
a. The Ambulance Service Board shall elect a Chairperson from among its membcrs by simple
. majority vote.
b. 'I'he Chief of the Spokane Valley Fire Department shall be the Acting Chair until all
mcmbers are appointed and a full vote can be taken. The election shall be hcld at the first
meetins of the year after the election of the Small PLG Group representatives.
c. The term of office for the Chair shall expire December 31 of the year after election, provided that the Chair may be replaced by simple majority vote of the Board at any time and such
replacement shall serve the remainder of the existing term.
7.8. Chair Duties, A e~. .
a. The Chair of die Ambulance Service Board shall bc a regular voting member of the Board.
b. The Chair shall establish the meeting agenda with input from the Contract Administrator.
~ Items may be added to the agenda by any PLG in accordance wilh rules of procedure
adopted by the Boazd.
Pagc 4 of 12
~
nRAFr a
7.9. Mcetines, Procedures. Open Public Meetings Act, Telephonic Meetim. ~
a. The Ambulance Service Board shall meet regularly as it may determine but not less than
every other month. All meetings of the Ambulance Scrvicc Board shall be subject to the
provisions of and conducted in accordance with the Open Public Meetings Act.
b. The Ambula.nce Service Board will determine its own rules of procedure, consistent with
the Open Public Meetings Act and this A,greement.
C. Ambulance Service Board Members may attend meetings by telephone.
8. AM]3ULANCE SERVICE BOA12D:12ESPONSIBILITIES. 8.1. Generallv.
a. "I'he Ambulance Service Board is responsible for developing and overseeing the general
administration of the Ambulance Service Contract.
b. The Ambulance Service Board is responsible for designating the Administering PLG and for
approving the Administering PLG's designation of the 'Contract Administrator. The
Ambulance Service Board may change the Administering PI.,G at any time. A change in the
Administering P_I.G may also remove the Contract Administrator employed by the departing .
Administering PLG.
c. The Arnbulance Service Board shall provide policy, direction and oversi,ght to the 'Administering PLG and Contract Administrator.
~
cl. Ambulance Service Board may idcntify performance issues with the Contract
Administrator by noliFying lhe Administering 1'LG in writing of any performanee issues.
d e. If there is disagreement between the Ambulance Servicc Board and the Administering PLG
regarding the Contract Administrator, the Board mAy elect to address this difi'erence by
re placement of the Administering PLG.
8.2. Procurement of Ambulance Services.
a. The Ambulance Service Board shall, in coordination with the Contract Administrator
develop an appropriate competitive process for procuring ambulance services for the
Contract Service Area in conformity with state law and this Agreement. The provisions
of Appendix A are mi.nimum rcquirements to be included in the Request for IIids for the
Ambulance Service Contract.
b. The Ambulance Service Board shall r0commend approval of an Ambulance Service
Contract to the PLGs.
8.3. E7ctensions, Modifications to Service L,evels. Other Chanees.
a. The Board must approve Ambulance Service Contract extensions, modification to service
levels prescribed in the Ambulance Service Contract, or any other amendments or changes
to the Ambulance Service Contract Except as othenvise provided, such actions are subject
Page 5 of 12
DRAFT
~ to fmal approval of the PLGs in the manner of approval of the original Ambulnr►ce Service
Contract
b. The Board may act without PLG approval for minor or incidental changes or other
administrative or housekeeping items that do not affect service levels or financial obligations
of any PL,Gs to improve convcnience and efficiency.
8.4. Bua
a. The Ambulance Service Board shall review and approve an annual budget prepared by the
Contract Administrator. No expenditures shall be made from funds subject to this
Agreement exce_pt in accordance with the approved budget and provisions of law.
b. The Ambulance Service Board shall review and approve any proposal or contract involving
' third party services subject to the limitation on Financial Commitments contained in Section
12.
$S. Contract Administration.
a. The Ambulance Service Board must approve and issue any declarations of default to the
Ambulance Service Contractor on such procedures as may be provided in the Ambulance
Service Contract or otherwise as determined by the Board.
b. The Ambulance Service Board must approve any fines, penalties 'or other sanetions on the
O Ambulance Service Contractor. 1le Board may designate any pflrtion of assessed fines or
penalties as payable directly to one or more PLGs where such PLGs ,vere directly affected
by the Ambulance Service Contractor's actions giving rise to the f ne, penalty or sanetion.
8.6. Citizen Concerns. The Ambulance Service Board shall review and take appropriate action on
unresolved issues, concerns or complaints from citizens or others related to ambulance services
provided under the Ambulance Services Contract.
. 8.7. Relatianships with PLGs. The Ambulance Service Board shall communicate directly with the
PLGs as necessary for any purposes related to the provision of ambulance services under the
Ambulance Service Contract or problems, questions or concerns about dvs Agreement.
8.8. Other Actions. T1ie Ambulance Service Board shall perform any other review, evaluation and
approval actions designated by the terms of ihe Ambulance Service Contract.
9. ADMINISTERhNG PLG: ROLE AND RESPONSE131I.ITY.
9.1. Taesi nation. The Spokane Valley Firc Department shall be the initial Administering 1'LG.
9.2. Fund Custodian. The Administering PLG shall be the custodian of all funds necessary for the
administration of the Ambulance Service Contract. All funds shal) be deposited by the
Administering PLG in a special restricted fund to be used onty as approved by the Ambulance
Service Board and in accordance with any restrictions required by either the funding sources,
legal requirements or the provisions of the Ambulance Service Contract.
~ Page 6 of 12
DRAFT
. 9.3. Contract Administrator Employer. The Administering PLG shall be the employer of the person
designated as Contract Administrator. The Administering PLG shall be solely responsible for all
employer responsibilities including compensaiion, benefits, discipline and dischazge. The
Administering PLG shall have sole discretion and control over the activities of its employee
subject to the recommendations of the Ambulance Service Board in relarion to the performance
oPthe Contract Administration duties.
9.4. Support Services. The Administering PLG shall provide any other neoded material and staff
support to the Ambulance Service Board as requested or necessary for it to carry out its duties.
9.5. Fundins; and Expenses. All e.cpenses incurred by the Administering PLG, including but not
limited to a proportionate share of employee expenses, shall be included in the Budget and shall
be funded by the Ambulance Service Contract or by Financial Commitments from the PLGs as
described in Section 12.
10. COiVT1tACT ADMINISTRATOR: ROLF AND RESPONSIBILITY.
10.1. 1?esi~ anon, The Spokane Valley Fire Department Fire Chief is the in'rtial Contract
Administrator.
10.2. Contract Administradon. The Contract Administrator shall conduct ongoing Ambulance Service
Contract administration and ovcrsight, including performance eriteria compliance, in accordance
with policy and direction of the Ambulance Service Boazd. The Contract Administrator shall
utilize daYa provided by the CCC, the ambulance provider or other resources for the
administration and oversight of the Ambulance Service Contracl.
10.3. Budget. The Contract Administrator shall develop, submit and administer an annual budget to
the Ambulance Service Board for its approval in accordance with Section 11.
10.4. Point-of-Contact. Tlie Contract tldministrator shall serve as the initial point of contact by all
parties for Ambulance Service Contract issues and coneerns. 10.5. Reccards. The Contract Administrator shall be responsible for managing and storing all data,
books and records related to contract administration, including but not limrted to complaints,
fines and penalties. This shall include maintenance of all confidential information as may be
required by law or direction of the Board.
10.6. Public Informarion Requests. The Contract Admin.islrator shall respond to public information
reyuests for rccords in accordance with state law and approved policy.
10.7. Consolidated Annual Report; Other Repor[s, lnformatian. 'Che Contract Administrator shall
prepare and present an annual consolidated report on EMS transport, no later than 90 days
after each contract year end, to the Ambulance Service Board and all PLGs. The report shall
include a summary accounting of fees charged for ambulance smices, a system evaluation
and forccast of anticipated ambulance improvements or problcros. After review and approval
by the Ambulance Service Board, the final report will be distributed to all PLGs. The Contract
Administrator shall provide such other reports or information as required by the Ambulance
Service Board. O
Page 7 of 12
D1tAFT
~ 11. BUDGET.
11.1. Fiscal Year. The Ambulance Service Board shall operate on an annual budget basis. The
fiscal year is the calendar year. The Atnbulancc Service Board is responsible for establishing
its budget each year, to be-finalized no later than the last business day in November for the
following fiscal year.
11.2. Expenses. The budget shall include all costs of contract administration and overhead and shall be in such detail required to allow for component identification and substantive review. ,
11.3. Revenues. 1'he contract budget shall include administrative fees paid by the Ambulance
Contractor to the Contract Administrator and any other revenues anticipated to be received.
11.4. Reserves. Reserves shall be established, maintained and used exclusivefy for contract
administration or other directly related costs as apprnv@d by the Ambulance Service Board. The
portion of any assessed fines or,penalties not payable directly to one or more PLGs in
accordance with this Agreemcnt shall be allocated to Reserves or as othenvise ordered by the
Board.
12. FIlNANCES.
12.1. Ambulance Service Contract Fundiniz. The Ambulance Service Contraat will include
payments from the Ambulanee Service Contractor sufficient to finance the costs of the
Cooperative as identified in this Agreement.
O 12.2. PLG Contributions. In the event the Ambulance Servicc Contract does not generate sufficient
funds, the Ambulance Service Board,. by a super majority vote, may request additional
• funding from the PLGS. tlny such requests must be approved by the respective governing
bodies. Such funding needs shall be allocated among the PLGs based on the PLGs
proportionate share of the total 911 ground ambulance transports over the term of the
Ambulance Service Contract prior to the date the funding request is made. The Cooperative, .
through the Administering PLG, may also seek grant funding from other sources.
13. L'DEMNIFICATION. -
13.1. Each party to this Agreement agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the others from all loss or
liability arising from its own intentional or negligent acts or omissions, including those of its
officers, agents and employees. PROVIDED, negligent acts or omissions of the Administeri.ng
PLG and/or Contract Administrator under this Agreement for the common benefit shall be
attributed in accord with Seotion 13.2. .
13.2. Each party further accepts the obligation to participate in its proporkionatc sharc of any loss or
liability to the extent of its enjoyment of and participation in the benefits of this Agreement,
either during the course of this Agreement, upon the termination and winding up of this
Agreement or there.after. Such share of participation shall be apportioned based on a PLGs
proporcionate shaze of the total 911 ground ambulance transports over thc term of the
t\mbulance Service Contract up to the date of oeaurence of the loss or liabiliry.
0
Page 8 of 12
DRAFT
13.3. The provisions of this Section 13 shall survive the withdrawal, expulsion, expiration oi ( )
termination of this Agreement as to any party or partics. All provisions of this Section are
secondary to any available insurance coverage, including self insurance.
14. 1NSURANCE.
14.1. Each party shall maintain in force, at its sole expense, minimum insurance (or equivalent self-
insurance approved by the Board) as follows:
a. General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis, with a combined single limit of not
less than $1,000,000 for each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. It shall '
include contractua) liability coverage for the indemnity provided under this Agreement.
b. Workers' Compensation Insurance in compliance with Title 51 RCW.
14.2. Each party shall be financially responsible for its pertinent deductibles, self-insured '
retentions, and/or self-insurance. Any aancellation, material change, reduction of limits or
intent not to renew insurance coverage(s) requires thirly (30) days written notice from the
insured or its insurer(s) to the Contract Administrator.
14.3. Parties shal) provide to the Contract Administrator a satisPactory certificate of insurance or .
other written evidence of the insurance coverage required by tbis Agreement.
_
15. WITHDRAWAL.
15.1. During a period when an Ambulance Service Contract is in effect, a PLG may terminate its
participa[ion in this Agreement only with the consent of die Ambulance Service Board and
provided diat the wilhdraw'tng PLG indemnifies the remaining PLGs for any cost or expense ,
created by the withdrawal.
15.2. During a period when an Ambulance Service Contract is not in effect a PLG may withdraNv with
180 days advmnced Nvritten notice. The notice shall lse dclivered to the other PLGs and the
Ambulance Service Board. Withdrawal does riot affect any residual obligations as provided in
Section 13. 15.3. A share of unexpencled and unencumbered funds, if any, may be returned to a withdrawing
pLG at llie time of withdrawal as determined solely and conclusively by a super majority of
the Ambulance Service Board.
16. EFFECTIVE DATElEXPIltATTON/AISTIt1BUTION OF TUNDS.
16.1. Effective Date. This Agreement commences 15 days after approval of eight or more pLGs.
16.2. Expiration Date. This Agreement expires thirty (30) days after the expiration or termination of an
Ambulance Service Contract provided for in th.is Agreement, includinS any extensions entered
into, unless a new contract has been agreed upun. Alternatively, th.is Agreement expires
December 31, 2009, if no Contract is signed by Yhat time. As to any withdrawing PLG, this
Agreement expires upon the effective date of the withdrawal. ~
Page 9 of 12 -
DRAFT
0 16.3. Distribution af Funds an Ex iration. When the entire Agreement expires, any remaining
revenues held in tho Caoperative-'s fun& shall be distributod in pro-rata shares autong the
remaining PLCas at the time of expuatian baseti on the PLCs proportionate share of the total
911 ground ambulance transporks over the term ofthe Ambulance Service Cantract.
17. DISPUTE RESOI1U'1'IDN.
17.1. Any disputes under this Agrccment shal] first be submittied for resolutian to the Ambulance
5ervice Board, In #he event the initial Ambulance Servsae Board resolution is unacceptable to
aitY partJ', such resalutian may be appealed to the Ambulance Service ]3oard far racansideratian.
- [f the fina! Ambulance Service Board resolutian is not agrecable, khe dispute shal l be submittrd
for mediation to a mediator appointed by the Ambulbnce Service Board with 15 days prior
written notice ta the Ambulance Service Board and each PLG,
17.2, if rnediation is unsuccessful, any party to the disputc may require the rnatter to be submitted #o
bindincr arbi~ation nnder the provisions af 1~CW 7.04A:
I
18. MISCELLANEOUS.
1$.1. Fntire rlgreement. 7"his documen# constitutes the entire agreernent af the garties and no change
at waiver shaJJ be recognized except by written approval wi#h the same formalities as original
accepWce. This shall not prevent ratification by the parties as they may dekennine proper in i
a~rPropriate circurnstances. -
~ 18.2. Amenments. Amendments to this Ag=mcnt ma}+ bc proposod by thc Ambulance Servicc
Board or by any PLG. Ta became binding, Arnendments must be made in writing and mus#
be recommended for approva] by the Arrkhulance~ Scnrice .Board and appraved by the
unanimous consent af #he PLGs,
18.3. SeverabilitY. If any prvvision is made invalid or unenforceable by a Coprt of competent `jurisdiction, it shall nat invalidate the entire Agreement, and the remainder shail remain in fu11
foroe and effect,
18.4. MergerlAnneacation, If a P.LG aonsolidates with $nother PLG through merg~,r, anncxation,
incorporation or through the creation of a Regional rire Pratection Authority, the
consoltd.aGted ent3ty shall become a party to this Agireement and a successor in interest to the
prsor PLGs interest on the effective da#e of the cansolida#ion without any action by the
remaining PLGS. ,
18.5. A licable Law and Venue. 'Y"his Agreement is to be perfotrried, interpreted and construed in
accordance with t#ie laws of the State of Washingion. Venue sliall be in a court af competerrt
junsdiction in Spokane County, Washington. .
. '
~ " II
Page 10 of 12
DRAVI'
APPEiVDI,X A
Parameters for Spokane Area Ambulance Service Request for Bid Provisions
lhis Appendix sets forth minimum policies, principles and performance criteria to be embodied in
the request for bids for che Ambulance Service Contrurt.
3Vlinimum Experience Reqnirements of Bidders
Minimum experience and expertise requirements will be identified to qualify accEptable Bidders. .
Fees and Charges
!'rovision for iaitial rates, rate increases, billiqg procedures, including billing reviews and reporting,
prohibited charges a,nd contract administrative fees.
Uniform Charges
The Average Patienl Charge Cap and Maximum Patient Charge Cap shall be uniform throughout
thc Contract Service Area.
Ambulance Deployment Restrictians
The Ambulance Service Contractor shall bc prohibited from contractualty committing any of its
ambulances to the exclusive benefit of any particular jurisdiction or group of jurisdictions except as
specifically provided in the ambulance contract (e.g., for special events).
The parkicipating jurisdictions shall have access to all resources of the Ambulance Service Contractor
at any given time, subject to fluctuatinns in consumer demand for service, weather conditions, major
emergency incident(s) and disaster situations.
Ambulance ncployment in Majnr Incident or Disaster Situation
In the event of major emergency incident(s) or disaster, the Spokane A.rea Fire Resources
Coordinator ("Area Coordinator") may provide direction to the Ambulance Service Contractor on ambulance
deployment and commitment.
Response Time
Performance critecia, includiug response time standards, to bc monitored and enforeed.
Penalties
Fines, penallies, liquidatad damages or similar provisions may be imposed on the Ambulance
Service Contractor when terms and conditions ofthe contract are not met. Recoras
Provisions for records maintenance, records requests and inspection of records.
Ambulance Service Contractor Requirements
Provisions identifying personnel, equipment, vehicles, communications and information
management requirements.
Quality Assurance _
Principles and standards for QA, patient care performance monitoring, inquires and complaints.
Insurance Levels of inswance coverage and other insurance provisions required.
Page I 1 of 12
DRAFT
~ Cooperative Protection
Requirements for assurance of service and f nancial integrity including escrow, letter of credit,
conditions for termination, default provisions, dispute resolution and other provisions to assure the protection
of the Cooperative and the public.
Term of Contract
The initial term of the Ambulance Service Contract shall be five (5) years from its effective date with
provision for one (1) five (5) year extension at the sole option of the Ambulance Service Board.
Consumcr Protection
Frovisions for hearing and responding to issues, coneems or complaints.
0
0
Page 12 of 12 .
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 20, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
(0 information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : City Center EIS/PAO Consultant Selection
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: None.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of the 2008 Budget that included funds for
this project.
BACKGROUIdD: In January 2008, city staff issued a request for qualifications (RFQ) for firms to
prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) and planned action ordinance (PAO) for the
City Center area as defined in the Sprague/Appleway Revitalization Plan (SARP). The City
received three responses to the RFQ, all qualified firms. The flrms included Perteet, Inc., ESA
Adolfson, and Berger/Abam-JD White. City staff then had each firm submit a proposal outlining
~ an approach to the project, a preliminary scope of work and budget.
City staff including Kathy McClung, John Hohman and Greg McCormick conducted interviews of
the three firms on March 28, 2008. Staff checked references of the two. top firms - Perteet and
Berger/Abam. After consideration of the written proposal, interviews and reference checks city
staff selected Berger/Abam as the top firm for the project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: $150,000 in 2008 budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Greg fNcCormick, AICP - Planning Division Manager
ATTAC H M E NTS:
~
~ Q~, .
Spo`~ll~arle
,;OOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley 1WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallQspokanevalley.org
Memorandum To: Dave Mercier, City Manager, Mike Jackson, Dep. City Manager
From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director .
Date: RAay 13, 2008 '
Re: April Report
April highlights in Finance included:
April financial reports •
Reports showing a comparison of revenues and expenditures, to tiie 2008 Rudget, are attached.
Gambling tax receipts for 2008 are expected to be less than budgeted. We have three signifiaant accounts
O that have fallcn behind. We will continue to monitor these accounts but full collection is unlikely. Our
budget for 2008 gambling tax receipts was reduced and will likely be reduced again for 2009.
Sales taY receipts are very close to our projections for 2008.
1`he investment report is attached for your review.
Finance vacanl position
One of our AccountantBudget Analysts recently left us for a position with Spokane County. We have
interviewed candidatcs to fill this position and selected our preferred applicant. Saydee Wilson will join
us in May.
2008 budget amendment
We are gathering information to amend our 2008 budget. We usually amend our budget in May and
November of each year. A public heari.ng was held on .April 22. A second reading of the amending
ordinance is scheduled for May 13.
2009 budget preparation
Budget preparation usually starts in April of each year for the coming year. This year wiU be more
challenging as our employees that have handled this task in prior years, are no longer with us.
O Finance has started the process but we expect some difficulties as we move forward.
Annual financial report - 2007
Staff has started this work and expects the arrival of the state auditor's office around the first of August.
Move to east side of buildina
Staff anticipates a move to the eastern edge of tiie building around the middle of May. This will provide
addirional space for other departments.
2008 street fund budoet
As staff and council are aware, winter maintenance costs for latc 2007 and early 2008 have been
substantial. As previously discussed, our plan for 2008, is to use resourees oF the Street Fund, reduce
planned expenditures of the Street Fund (transportation impact fee study and some engineering), and then
rely on the Winrer Weather Reserve Fund to pay related costs. Staff will monitor this budget during the
year for results that are different from our expectations.
~
;
.
~ ~
O City of Spokane Valley General Fund
Budget Variance Report
For the Perlod Ended April 30, 2008
. Unaudited
Budget April YTD Unrealized Peroent
_2928_ Revenues Revenues Revenue Realized
General Fund Rovanues:
Unreserv2d Fund Balanae $ 5,000,0130 $ - $ 9,000,000 $(4,000,000) 180.00°r6 8
Praperty Tax 10,496,500 383,421 613,717 9,882,783 5.8596 11
Sales Tax 19,165,800 1,371,032 4,605,464 14,560,336 24.039'0
Gambling Tax 720,000 65,443 141,515 578,485 19.65% 2
Franchise FeeslBusiness Ucenses 853,450 233,662 254,883 598,567 29.87% 1
State Shared Revenues 1,170,550 167,107 394,927 775,623 33.74% 1
Planning 8 Buflding Fees 1,965,000 316,242 761,006 1,203,994 38.73%
Fines and Forfeitures 1,300,000 149,009 474,015 825,585 36.469'0
Recxeadon Progrdm Fees 507,000 133,061 267,791 239,209 52.829'0
Investment Interest , 414,100 39,184 132,018 282,082 31.8895 Operating 7ransfers 165,000 - - 165,000 0.0096 3
Total General Fund RAVOnues: $ 41,757,400 $ 2,858,161 $ 16,645,336 $ 2501121064 39.86%
Budget April YTD Unrealized Percent
2008 Exnenditures Fxger4ditures Exoenditures Replized
OGeneral Fund Expenditures:
Legislative Branch 319,991 15,201 111,363 208,628 34.80°,6 4
Exerutive & Legislative Support 997,076 74,141 298,506 698,570 29.94%
Public Safety . 19,297,300 1,530,193 4,300,988 14,996,312 22.29%
Operations & AdminisUative Svcs 1,655,707 95,706 367,294 1,288,413 22.18% Public Works 789,437 66,979 254,337 535,100 32.22%
Planning 8 Communiry Dev. 3,563,139 354,523 1,021,373 2,541,766 28.66%
Library ServiCes 20,000 - - 20,000 0.00% 7
Parks & Recreation 2,644,420 210,770 458,398 2,186,022 17.33%
General Government 3,417,988 190,696 739,146 2,678,842 21.63%
Total General Fund Expenditures: $ 32,705,058 $ 2,538,209 S 7,551,405 $ 25,153,653 23.09°k
~ 511412008 3:02 PM
City of Spokane Valley
Other Funds
Budget Varlance Report
For the Period Ended April 30, 2005
Unauditad
Budget April YTD Unreaiized Percent
2008 $gygnygg Revenuea $gtiQpu~ Realized
OtherFunds Revenues:
Street Fund $ 5,875,972 S 166.133 E 498,774 E 5,377,198 8.49% 13
Merial Street Fund - 1,659 8,613 (6,613)
Tralls and Paths 30,000 49 330 29,870 1.10X 6
HoteUMote! Fund 668,000 28,362 84,495 583,505 12.6596
Civic FaciGtiea Replaoement 397,000 830 3,208 393,792 0.8156 9
Debt Service - LTGO 03 600,000 - - 800,000 0.00%
Capital Projects Furrd 4,420,000 74,933 256,576 4,163,424 5.80°A. 5
Specia! Capital Projeds Fund 4,420,000 76,335 259,966 4,160,034 5.88% 5
Street Capltal Projacta 7,354,023 27,887 27,887 7,326,136 0.38% 5
Mirabesu Po+nt Projed 454,000 756 2,922 451,078 0.64% 6
Stroet Bond Capital Pro}ects - - - -
Capitel Granta Fund 7,176,040 - - 7,176,000 0.00% 5
Barker Bridge Reconatructlon 5,862,800 - - 5,862,800 0.00% 5
Stormwater Mgmt Fund 3,160,000 64,679 122,252 3,037,748 3.8796 13
Equip. Renlal 8 Replacement 780,000 1,592 6,659 773,341 0.8596 13
Risk Man ment 217,100 30 188,112 28,988 86.6594 12
Centerplaca Operating 335,000 700 2,728 332,272 0.81% 9
Servioe Level Stabllizafion 5,400,000 10,846 41,919 5,358,081 0.7896 9
Winter Weather 580,000 1,161 4,489 555,511 0.80% 9
Parks Capital 4,260,000 397,766 7,400 4.252,600 0.17% 9
Civic Bufldings 5,085,000 11,810 45,916 5.039,084 0•90% 9
ToWI Other Funds Revenuea: t 67.054.895 S 865.528 S 1.560.246 S 55.49d.649 jM
Budget April YTD Unrealized Percent
no Emendiluros Expenditur" Expendituroa Realized
Other Funda Expsnditurea:
Slreet Fund S 4,195,304 $ 203,441 $ 1,487,698 $ 2.707,606 35.46% 13
Artenal Street Fund - - - -
Trails and Paths 30,000 - - 30,000 0.00% 6
HoteUMotel Fund 668,000 83,367 83,387 584,633 1246%
Civic FadGtles Replacement 397,000 - - 397,000 0.00°Y6 6
Oebt Servica LTGO 03 600,000 - - 600,000 0.0096
Capital ProJects Fund 4,420,000 - - 4,420,000 0.00% 5
Spedal Capital Projeda Fund 4,420,000 - - 4,420,000 0.00% 5
Street Capital Projecb 7,354,023 118,196 152,427 7,201,596 2.07% 5
Mirabeau PoiM Project 454,000 - - 454,000 0.0096 8
Street Bond Capital Projects - - - -
Capital Grants Fund 7,178,000 45,697 80.009 7,095,991 1.1196 5
Barkar Bridge ReconaWdion 5,882,800 15,228 18,454 5,844,346 0.31%
StormwaterMgmtFund 1,983,944 27,711 162,942 1,821,002 8.2196 13
Equip. Rental 8 Replscemnt 780,000 3,518 3,518 776,482 0.45% 14
Risk Mana menl 217,100 - 187,048 30,052 86.16% 12
Centerplace Operating 335,000 • - 335,000 0.00% 6
Service Level SWbilizatan 5,400,000 - - 5,400,000 0.00%6
Winter Weather 560,000 - - 560,000 0.0096
Parlca Capital 4,260.000 29,446 35,810 4,224,190 0.8496 5
Civic Buitdings Capital 5,085,000 25.618 57,973 5,027,027 ,1 14%
Tota) Other Funda Exponditures: f 54.198.177 i 552.220 S 2289.246 t 61.828.925 4,19Y.
504.r2008 3:02 PM
0 City of Spokane Valley
Investment Report
For the Month of Aprll 2008
Total
LGIP` BB Money Nikt'"' BB CD Investments • .
Beginning $ 38,796,132.40 $ 1,644,448.75 $ 1,048,944.59 $ 41,489,525.74
Deposits 1,736,017.81 - - 1,736,017.81
Withdrawls (750,000.00) - - (750,000.00)
Interest 87,366.79 2,702.55 - 90,069.34
Ending $ 39,869,517.00 $ 1,647,151.30 $ 1,048,944.59 $ 42,565,612.89
Balances bv Fund
General Fund $ 13,135,214.91
Street Fund 2,548,772.61
Arterial Street 808,226.58
Paths & Trails 23,767.95
Hotel/Motel 415,184.96
CenterPLace Operating Reserve 341,294.25
Service Level Stabilizabon Reserve 5,284,819.20
Winter Weather Reserve 565,918.17
~ Civic Facilities Replacement 404,465.13
Capital Projects 4,248,980.36
Special Capital Projects 40931,942.22
Mirabeau Point Project 368,412.06
Parks Cap'rtal Project 932,902.09
Civic Buildings Capital Projects 5,754,871.18
Stormwater Management 2,010,437.98 Equipment Rental & Replacement 775,701.54
Risk Management 14,701.70
$ 42,565,612.89 "Local Government Investment Pool
Banner Bank
O
~
FOOTNOTES
1 Received quarterty
2 Three accounts in arrears
3 First quarter transfers not yet made
4 AWC membership paid in Jan.
5 Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, acquire right of way and
construct. 6 No projects planned in 2008
7 Small amount of 05 library tax due district
8 Estimated, pending 07 review
9 Interest earnings
10 Most equipment fully funded in late 05 11 Most tax received in May and Nov.
12 Ins premium paid in Jan.
13 Beg. Bal. included which understates realized amounts and %
14 For replacement of vehicles 8 computers
'
. ~
5/14f20U8 3:02 PPA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
LONG RANGE PLANN►NG:
Planning Commission
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission met three times dunng the month of Apnl to deliberate
on the SpragudAppleway Revitalizatlon P{ari. The Commissbn will continue to meet every week
untfi they have a recommendation to forward ta tfie City Council.
SpraguelAppleway Revitalization Plan
The Planning Commission began meeting weekly in April to deliberate on Sprague and Appleway
Corridas Subarea Plan. Scot! Kuhta and Kathy McClung aaended the Aptil SVBA (Spokane
VaUey Buslness Association) meeang to discuss the Subarea Plan. Mr. Kuhta attended the
Planning Assodation of Washington's (PAW} annuai confetence tn Cheian where he presented
the Subarea Plan to about 40 conference attendees.
City Center Project
ClearPath LLC continued warking with City staff on property negotiaUons br a City Hell site. Ciry
Councll approved a non-binding Letter of Intent to purchase property, laying tt►e foundabon far
negoUatlons on a Purchase and Sale Agreement
City staft has completed the selection process 10r consultant services to ptepare an
environmental impact statement and planned actian ardinance for the City Center zone. Three
fiRns were interviewed and BergerlAbartrJD White was selected for the project Staff will present
this Informaation to the Councfl in May and anticlpates executing a oontract with the seiected
consultant in June/July timeframe. ProJect commencement will likely occur in the
September/Odobet timeframe aRer the Coundl has had the oQportunity to review the Plan.
Council decisions witl impact the directiun of the proJect
CTED Regional Collaborstion Grant Project
The Washirtgtan State Community and Econornic Deveiopment Department awarded Spokane
Gounty and the cities of Spokane, Spokane Valley, Lfberty Lake, Airway Heights, and the Tawn of
Millwood e grant that allaws the County and affected dtles to move farward with cooniinated
planning for the metro urban growth ar$a One of the tasks of the project is the identfiqtion of
the fiscal and senrice delivery impacts of ttte metro urban grawth eteas on the County.
On Wednesday, May 28, 2008, &ett Scheckler of Berk and Assoclates wiU present information
gathered to date ori revenues generated and the cast of service provision to the urban growth
areas. He wi11 also present conditions in Spokane County compared to ather Washington
countles.
In additon, Crai~g Lacliser, Ptanning and Development Servrnces Director for Snohomish
County, wkll destxibe the strateg}c planning undervvay ln Snahomish County to accommodate
transibons of goNemanae in urban growtlh areas.
Urban Growth Area (UGA) Boundary
City stafl, on an ongoing basis, has been parbdpa6ng in the regional Planning Techn'scal Advisory
Cammittee (PTAC) regarding the update of the county UGA and other regional issues. This
group meeUs rypically on a weekly basis and has been focused on the UGA issue for the past
several wceks. The Growth Management Steefing Committee has schedubed a public hearing at
Page 1 of H
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APR1L 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
the May 21, 2008 meeting on the amendment to the Countywide Planning Policies regardmg the
UGA update process.
2808 Comprehensh►e Plan AmendmeMs/Updates:
The City received 8 privatety initiated corriprehensive plan amendment applicaLons by the
November 1, 2007 deadline. In adddion, staff idenbfied several wmprehensive plan text
amendments necessary to etther update exisbng information or to correct inaccurate information.
These amendments were reviewed by the Planning Commission at a study session on April 24,
and public hearings are scheduted for May 8m and May 22"'
CURRENT PLANN/NG:
Revenue for the Pfanning Divisiori for the month of Apnt was $16,920
2008 Pianning Revenuss
ssaooo
- '
$40.000
mooo -
t2aooo ~
i t 0.000 ~
i f0
Jio F'b IiAr APrt Ift A. A* AW 5eb Oct !bv Osc
' p Ravenue 200Q m=Fcvetue 2007 A- F-0averws 2U06 i
Dunng the month of Apnl. Planning Division steff held Fourteen commercial pre-applicaGon
meetings and received 6 commerciat buifding permits. Twenty-one Ucenses end pefmlls were
issued by statf for the month af April with 11 of thase being Home Professlon permits. Planning
Oivision staft approved eightesn commercial building peRnits, which indudes a change in use
from Tidyman's grocery store to Victory Fafth Fellowship Church, 2 Espresso stands, a new water
slide at Splashdown, a 44,000 sf manufacturingAnrarehouse on Alkl Avenue arxi a 9,000 sf
warehouse addfion tor Utec Materials, Inc A flnal plat for fourteen lots was compieted as we(I as
SEPA determinatiorts for 3 commercial projects. The Division answered 287 phone calls in ttie
permit center, and helped 328 customers at the counter
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
2008 Permks Isaued
60
.e - - - ~ - - -
° .)w Feri u U U
t, i ~w. Apr n+try .l~m .a ,l Aug ~ se~p ocs l Nw, Oec
1 ~ - • - -
I ~ 2DOA ~ 25 20 18
-1-
iQ 2007 57 13 te ta 20 iB 18 10 8 Q 11 ~
-
2006 ~44 26 ~ ]6 34 92 23 32 36 24 21 19 6D
In the mortth o1 April, Planning Department staR accepted 4 boundary line adjustrnents, 5
pretimJnary short plats, 4 final short ptats and 1 pnetiminary subdivisian flle. Staff conducted 9
land use pre-apptication meetings and 2 public hearings were conducted by the Hearing
Examiner in Aprfl.
-i
2008 New Land Use Actbns
I
40 ~
30 20 - - - ~ - -
10 - - _ --e
0
.fan Fet W-r ACr maY Jun! 30 Au➢ SeD ' Q:t Nw ~ Oec I I
p 2ppg_.. 14 i 13 ~ 10 ~ 13 i - I
i 2pp716 77 17 12 416 15 9 14 I 19 ~ t7 1~2 -
+ . ,
2pg 20 18 30 24 27 15 26 ( 20 17 ~ 19 9 ~ e
-1 - • . _ i
BUILDING D/VISION:
The Building Division Issued 353 permits in Apria 2008, campared with 394 for the same period
fasi year. Nevv one and Nvo dwelNng unit strudure permits totaled 37 and new commercial
structure permits tatsled seven tor the month of April.
2008 CONSTRUCTION PEWrIfTS
I
eao ~ - - - ~ ~
_ _ - - - - - ~
Oa "b+ ' DW
° s., ~ Feo I us I Ap May A.u ah Aw ' sea ~
~07U Pwa+ih~ 242 ~ - 2 u m ' ~ ~ - ' c 20Q7 Pomb' 217 I31 344 396 461 301 30 7di 724 s~l 20 174
-r 7fID9 Petf'ttf i 275 ZS) J~' , 3?5 _ SSd ~l 3i3 12 21 E ~-27]
Page 3 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
2008 New SVuctur+es/Unita Permkted
sa
ro -d
~
- -
30
20
Io -
° J.n c~e ' M. Aa ~ Mry ru+. I a,y Au0 sea oa ' M. D.
DNow 1 t 2 Dw inp Uri@ tY 1 n ~ IS 37 j
r + - - - - -
■ yb4wrkf ltis ~ 1 2 0 0
IO Nw Ovmrd9NCArM ` ! ~ 3 f 7 _
' - - - - -
in April 2008, buiiding inspectors performed 964 inspediorts in 22 days. This averages 43.8
inspecUons per day. The Plaris Examiners rsviewed 143 projects in the manth of April and there
were 27 projeds awaiting review at the end of month Four over-the-counter permits woere issued
in the month of April
2008 Bullding Inspections
I
FiCO - - - -
I
° ~F*b M. 1 Aa 1 w;Am , fX. iW, a, ro. ~
~m►~Maan. aw at. i, eis ~e+
1 ' I
M7 ~p ~e~~ j 1tq In, j ~u7 ~bi0 UU ttl --l7oS t)a MI I I
o7o6T1~Yw i
' ,1111,,,,.,,..
The reported value of construction, including new sUuctures and addidunsJalteration is shown in
the following chart, companng these values with 2007. New value ior Aprd 2008 totals
$45,365,581.00.
2008 Valuation ot Conatruction
Sso.ooo,ooo
$45.000.000
S4QOW.OO0
$35.000.000 e
S30.000.000 1 20Da Valuatian
I
S25.000.000 20D7 ValueGon
520.000.000 . - - - ~ t. 2006 Valuation
$15,000.000
~ S10,000,000
- R - - r~• - -
I $5,000,000 ' -
Id, Fet, A,tor Apr Wy A"- !uFr :tixg sept oct Nov Dec
Page 4 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
Building revenues for the month of April were $276,864. This is a62% fnaease from 2007. The
spike in April valuation was IargHy due to Walt Wortliy's commetciai office building.
1008 Building Revenues
s3oo,~oc ~
aoo,aoo - - ~ ' f t9C,,0oG i°---- on 20Q7 Remuea
:100,000 - - - ~-t2006Re+e.~x~es
isG00o - i
Jan =eh 1rr Arr Iik,o Aa+e !Ji ?•~y Seat r: Itw Ox ~
- - '
CODE COMPLIANCE:
The number oi "Violattons Reported' on the fotlowing chart reflects actual Spokane Valley Zoning
Code violations, plus complaints rece+ved whlch were not violatians. The compiaints rec,ehred are
added to the total because they reflect time officers spertt in the field oonductlng investfgations.
In addition, the 'Investigated" and 'Pending' columns accuratefy reflect Code Carnpliance's
cument ability to process and investigate backlog cases.
The tollawing chart provides a monthly comparison oi the rypes of Spokane Valley Code
vioiatfons reported. viotafions are reported based on the primary c+omplaint received, tather than
the number of additional violattons identified on any individual premises. The invesbgauon of a
camplafnt of junk vehicles, for exampte, might also result in identfication of additional violations
such as the accumulaUon of trash or harbonng of Itvestock. These are not included in the
summary. A total oT 82 new complaints were processed in April.
I Code Compliancs Flits 2005
140
12t1 , . `
100
4C< < - I ~ ~ I I = - ' ~
20 ` I ' I f
. .
~
~
,
~ . ~
.t
AOr- May• Jun• ,1~07 ~A~- 5'°~ «t- Nov- Lbc• .i~ Fe~- Mu- /1pr-
07 07 07 07 W 07 07 07 06 Oe 06 ab I
■ vwbbww wporrea 71 eo sa » eo re 66 36 21 zs 118 75 82_
• AO&Ur►rrMS 42 48 61 p 42
i_46 56 21 n 18 67 e6 `~6 l
o Fie Tranttwn t0 0- 6 2 2 / 0 2' 7 t 1 1 0'
~
Is qxdrp qa 68 25 47 48 56 e3 58 BO 9e I 43 e0 55 68
- - - ~
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
The Spokane Vatley Police Departrnent, in conjundion with SCOPE, has requested tre
assistance of Code Compliance in ideritffying Junk vehides abandoned within the right-ot-way.
SCOPE vdunteers tag the vehides. Vehickes which have not been moved by the following Fnday
are tawed.
Activity is consoHdated into the bllowing sfx categories' Envlmnmenta! (sewerlseptic, criiical
aneas, anirnal and nuisance violations); Property (Right of Way, property use, dangerous buildmg,
landlordltenant, illegal business and sigrnage violabons); Junk Auto - Sdrd Wsste (sdid waste,
Hlegal dumping, and household waste violations); and CJearview TiiaRgfe and Complainf.
~
i
2008 Code Vbletlons by Category
i
.l
- - - - - - -
160
140
• - - -
I 120
100
8U ~ - -
6C - - - - - -
4G
20
~ 0 sar,-ce I FeL-" ta.r•0e , nri oa ~ M.r-oe i sun-oe Ju~oe Auq-tsa sai-oa Od-0e I ►+~w-os oct-oe
~ Solld Yad& 3 la 19 9E I I
7 f 73 ' 40 37
a Roperty 6 ~ 13 13 I 43 I
~DJw* Auo 2 tD 10 21 `
• Er+vkaureaital f 1~ 9 1 i I
•cwowlt - Mo vbl.6onI 3 e 11 7
I a Q4~rVbw Tranab ! 7 0 2 2 ~
Page 6 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APR1L 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
DEVELOPMENT ENGfNEER/NG:
The Develapment Engineers processsed 43 61es in Apnl. The signiflcant files are nine commerdal
applications, induding an Aircraft Storage Building, a Central Pne-Mbc addition, a new
office/warehouse space for Trent-Ovllar and converting e)dsting space into a Thrift Sfore for the
Salvatlon Army. FtReen commercial pre-application files were reviewed induding a One and a
hali story officeM►arehouse for Intemwuntain Supply, an addidon to Rosauers, an additian of Mro
new buildings to the Spokane Athletic Club, 13 land use pre-apps, one subdivision, and two short
subdivisions.
I
Ormlolinnan1l Enonaq work by Tyw
ron - -
~ 90%
~ox
eox
i 40%
'ox
i 20%
-
10%
~
JYe47 Jul-07 Atq-OT ieO47 Oc[-0f MDV-07 4c-OT Jtn418 Feb-0 Yu40 Ap►4l
■ eincwng siie Pfar+ ■ soundery une n4ustrr+ent oCharpe a uae
■ Cortunarcial ■ Canmamfal Pie-ApQe • Cond'tbionel LJae Permit I
• Finel SubdMsion ■ Land llse P►Mpp ■ Ratone
■ ShoR Subd~sion O Street Vacadan '
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
APRIL 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
CUSTOMER SERVJCE:
Planning
The planning staff assisted 328 wafk-in customers at the counter and handled 267 customers'
irtquires by pttone in the permit center.
Buflding Permits
The following table summanzes the perforrnance of the Permit Center for those penrnts entered
in the PLUS system, measured fram the time that the applicabon is deemed "counter-complete"
to the time that a peRnit is issued.
Commercial Timetrime Summary
Submtttal to tasuance
A r-08
cn
V y 7~. m
o 49 VatUe ~ ~ ~
NEW CQNSTRUCTlON
industrial Buildin 2 $1,167 981 81 77 84
Mercantlle 1 $14,614 38 38 38
Office/Protessional 3 $29 520 896 95 56 125
Structure 1 $4 924,864 32 32 32
REMODEL
Industrial8uildin 2 $156,339 22 19 25
Mercantile 7 $657,355 28 2 65
Office/Professional 5 $380,661 17 2 41
Recreational Buildin 1 5325,000 142 142 142
Reh ious Buildin 1 $200,000 65 85 65
ADOITION
Industnal8uildin 1 $3,451,360 58 _58 _ 581
UPCOM/NG DATES OF INTEREST:
DATE INTEREST
May 5 Michael Freedman speaal meeting with the Planning Commission
May 21 Growth Management Steering Committee public hearing
May 28 Collaborative Grant luncheon
June 20 Scott Kuhta will be a speakef at the Chamber breakfast
July 2g PreseMation to the City Council regarding and Planning Commission
regarding Urban Growth Boundaries by Susan Winchell and 8ill Grirnes
November 1 Deadline to submit 2009 Camprehensive Plan Amendments
Page 8 of 8
Spokane
Va11ey~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MOIdTHLY REPORT
April 2008
AGREEMEMTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION:
• Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal
• Street Sweeping - AAA started winterlspring sweeping.
• Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair oontract -Poe AsphaPt Paving Inc. worlced on winter
potholing.
• Landscaping Senrices - Spokane ProCare has stopped working for the winter.
• Vactoring Contract - AAA Sweeping removed ponding water around drywells.
• Engineering Services Support - Agreements with private engineering fiRns.
*Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interlocal
*Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal
WASTEWATER:
• Proposals have been received from two firms for the design, build and operation of the Spokane
County Regional Water Reclamation Facility. We are schedule to make a final selection in late June.
0 Ecology is still reviewing the public comments on the TMDL. We have not received a date when the
draft will be available for review. Information is available at their web site at:
http://vuww.ecy.wa.gov/programslwq/tmdUspokaneriveNdissolved_oxygen/index. html
CAPITAL PROJECTS:
• City Hall Project -
Bemardo Wills and GGLO conducted the first programminglvisioning meetings with each department
and key staff on November 15, 2007. On December 11t'they conducted t+nro programminglvisioning
meetings with all members of the City staff. On January 12'h they conducted a two hour
programming/visioning meeting with the City Council at their winter retreat. On January 17th and 18t'
they conducted two full days of detailed meetings wfth each department regarding specific needs for
. individual spaces, Equipment, support spaces and functional relationships within the departments and
between other departments.
We reviewed the draft City Hall Program and are review meeting on April 8t' and followed up on
comments We are planning to have the draft program to Council in May and will follow that with a
presentation to Council from Bemardo Wills and GGLO.
• Valley Corridor Project
Project on hold pending outcome of the SpraguelAppleway Corridor Sub Area Plan.
• Street Master Plan
JUB Engineers their work on assisting in the development of the draft 2009-2014 TIP. They have also
completed evaluations on approximately 9/< of this year's residential streets and began evaluating
Principal Arterials May 5.
• Broadway Ave Reconstruction - Moore to Flora (0088)
Initial project layout complete; stormwater altematives developed; working on right-of-way plan;
Advertised RFP for Real Estate Services.
• ApplewaylSpraguelDishman Mica ITS (0062) ~
Met wRh WSDOT and Spokane County to review existing facilities and assumptions for project;
WSDOT will provide design services for this project; WSDOT will charge their time on this project to
another grant they have; bid date scheduled for 8/1/08.
• Children's Universal Park (0086)
Received fee proposal from Consultant and forwarded to Council for revieuv and approval.
CONSTRUCTION
• Pines/Mansfield (0005)
All right of way has been acquired and we have requested oertification from VIJSDOT. Design is 99%
complete. The final project cost estimate is now approximately $5.5M. TIB has preliminarily agreed to
approve $329,034 in additional funds. The project is currently expected to advertise for bids in May
2008 with construction scheduled to begin in June 2008.
0 Appleway Avenue Reconstruction - Tschirley to Hodges (0016)
Bids for the project were opened on September 28th. Knife River was awarded the project as the low
bidder for $4,565,859.95. Construction began March 17th. Knife River is currently constructing the
South half of the roadway. Crushed surfacing and curbs have been placed. Signal work has begun.
• Barker Road Bridge Project (0003)
The project was advertised on April 18, 2008. The bid opening date is May 16. Staff continues to work
with utilities to relocate servicss. Construction scheduled to begin in late iUlay 2008.
0 20 Avenue Reconstruction Project (0053)
Project will open bids on May 6th with construction scheduled to begin in June, 2008.
• Broactway / Fancher PCC Intersection (0067)
Environmental Phase, Topographical Survey and Geotechnical Report are complete. Bid Documents
and Plans are in development. Project is scheduled to Advertise for bids in June with construction
scheduled to begin in July, 2008.
• Sprague / Bowdlsh, PCC Intersection (0092)
Beginning environmental stage. Topographical sunrey and geotechnical report are complete. Bid
scheduled for July, construction in fall of 2008.
• Broadway Ave Rehab - I-90 EB Ramps to Park Rd (0068)
No work has begun on this project yet.
• Signal Controller Upgrade Project (0071)
Construction funds released on April 29.. Controllers will be purchased off state contract; Spokane
County and WSDOT signal maintenance crews will test, program, and install new controllers under
existing engineering services contracts.
• Sprague/Conklin Signal (0077)
Awaiting estimate from Knife River (contractor for the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project).
~
• Broadway Ave Safety Improvement - Park Rd to Pines Rd (0063)
Presented information to Council on results of accident reduction on three-lane Broadway between
Pines Rd and Sullivan Rd. Staff recommends not moving ahead with project until more accident data
can be evaluated.
O• Swimming Pool Upgrade Project (0073, 0074, 0075)
Contractor began demolition and remodel work on all three existing pool houses. The contractor
proposes to continue worlc on the Park Road Pool slide through the summer. The Valley Mission Park
and Terrace View Park pool additions will begin after this summees swimming season.
• Old Senior Center Demolition (0072)
Old Senior Center Demolition - Working on the development of a bid paclcage for asbestos removal
and demolition of existing building.
• Valley Mission Park Upgrade (0076)
Working with Parks Dept. on the development of a schedule and plans for work can be accomplished
this year.
• Barker Road ProJect
Project complete. Punch list complete. Project closeout to begin. No changes
Spaldings Sanitary Sewer Project
The projects design is complete. This project will bid with the White Birch Project. The bid opening is
scheduled for May 7'".
• Trentwood Sanitary Sewer Project
The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on July 9, 2007. The project is
approximately 80°k complete. Project restarted March 10.
Grandview Acres Sanitary Sewer Pro]ect
The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on June 5, 2007. The project is
approximately 80% complete. Project restarted March 10.
• Rockwell/Summerfield Sanitary Sewer Project Phase I
This project is bid with Summerfield. The project was awarded to Knife River. Construction is
scheduled to begin on Aliay 7t'.
• Rockwell Sanitary Sewer Project
Taylor Engineering is designing the project. Bid opening is scheduled for May 10.
• Summerfield Sanitary Sewer Project
This project bid with RockwelVSummerfield. Knife River was awarded the contract.
• Sutters Sanitary Sewer ProJect
The project was awarded to SI Construction. Construction is scheduled to begin on May 8t'.
• White Birch Sanitary Sewer Project
Century West Engineering designed the project. The Bid opening is scheduled for May 7I'
TRAFFIC:
• Participated in kickoff for SR 27 corridor safety project.
• Implemented new phasing on Sprague from Pines to Sullivan to improve lunchtime coordination.
0 Extended program through the aftemoon into evening rush hour. ,
• Preparing application for WSDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian grants to install push-button actuated
beacons on Mirabeau Pkway.
• Worked with SRTC staff to develop bicycle and pedestrian ideas for 2010 Campaign.
• Placed order for LEDs to continue replacing incandescent bulbs.
• Installed and tumed on the McDonald school beacons.
• Obtained a grant to add rear-facing beacons to all existing school beacon instaliations.
• Assisted Capital Projects with design issues on Appleway, Sprague/Bowdish concrete intersection, ~
and CMAQ grants.
• 25 New citizen requestslcomplaints were received via phone and email. These typically involve
traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concems, streetlight outages,
requests for new streetlights, traffic count requests, and parlcing issues.
STORNIWATER:
• Continued planning for implementation of the NPDES Phase II and UIC requirements.
• Found error in UDC. Stormwater fee language had been left out. Worked with Legal to get
language back into UDC.
• HOA are protesting stormwater fees on private roads. Looking into and will be making decision
soon.
STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY:
The following is a summary of Public WorksJContractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for
AAril, 2008;
A. Poe asphalt has continued repairing asphalt c4ncrete (Full depth patching) throughout Spokane
Valley. Large summer projects to follow.
B. City of Spokane Valley Maintenance Supt. has met several times with Poe Asphalt Supt. Planning
summer construction activity.
C. Cats Eye Excavating installed an additional 14 new storm water systems in vanous locations
throughout the Valley. Cats Eye also made various repairs to existing storm water structures.
D. Triple A Sweeping has operated Brooms and water trucks daily performing the annual Spnng
Sweeping Program. .
E. Triple A Sweeping has operated Vector for the Under Ground structure cleaning program. An
estimated 6000 + under ground structures exist in the City of Spokane Valley.
F. Geiger crews have worked in the City of Spokane Valley one day per week cleaning the City of litter
and debris.
G. Local tree companies have completed minimal trimming of problem trees, tree removal of dead or
dying trees and overhanging limbs in the City right-of-way. This will be an ongoing maintenance
program and will continue throughout the summer.
H. Several citizen inquiries were responded to and resolved.
STREET: Through the end of April private contracts invoiced $81,936, and the County invoiced
$1,154,985 for a total Street Maintenance cost of $1,236,921.
STORMWATER: The County invoiced $2,924 and private contracts invoiced $238,610, for a total
Stormwater Maintenance cost of $241,534.
The overall total for 2008 through March is $1,478,455.
See Graph on following page.
O
Street & StoRnwater Maintenance Totals through April
2008 Coun 3 ormwator ~
Cos i2~824 I
4
2007 County S ormwater
I
Costs $2 434
~
i
~
2008 PrivatA Stormwater " Costs $238,610
3 -
2007 Prfvata St rmwater
Costs $1, 17 ~
I
,
~ i
i
I
I
2 2 7 County Stree Costs
$547,096.00
2008 Pril ate Street Cos I ~
$81,936
02007 Privste treet Costs
$26,369.00
I
5- 5200.000 00 $400:000.00 $600,000.00 $800,000.00 $1,000,000.00 $1.200,000.00 $1,400,000.00
6vo Spok~ane
,;OOValley Capital Improvement Program
2008 PROJECTS
Estimated Design Gonstrucdon 2008 Total Projoct
Funding Completion Complete Complete Funding Cost
Construction Pro;octs Projoct Location Date
oons PfneslNlansfield Pro9eci Wi[bur Rd. to Pines Rd., Pines to 190 TIBlCfiAAQ Oct-09 99% 096 $1,032,015 $ 5,378,372
oola Appleway Avenue Reoonstrucfoon Tschirley Rd. to Hodges Rd. STP(U) Oct-08 100% 2596 $ 609,000 $ 6,a99,568
0003 Baricer Road Bridge Replacement Barker Rd. at Spokane River BR Dec-09 100% 096 $ 896,101 $ 10,000,000
oo53 24th Avenue Reoonstruction Suflivan Rd to Veraaest/22nd Ave. Inters. City Sep-08 100% 096 $ 900,000 $ 900,000
oos7 Broadway/Fancher PGC Intersection Broaduiay arud Fancher Intersection STP(U) Oct-08 65% 096 $ 581,000 $ 581,000
ooez Sprague/Bawdish PCC Intersedion Sprague and Bowdish Intersectuon STA Oct-08 35% 096 $ 182,900 $ 892,000
ooea BroadwsyAve Rehab EB I-90 Ramps to Par4c Rd STPtU) OcE-08 0% 096 $ 110,100 $ 741,200
omi Signal Gontroller Upgrade Various Locations CMAQ Nov-08 100°96 096 $ 34,600 $ 258,400
ooT7 SpraguelConklin Signal Sprague and ConkM Intersection Qevelapers OcE-08 10a°lo 096 $ - $ 250,000
oosa Broadway Ave Safefyr Improvement Park Rd to Pines Rd T16 Oct-08 0% 096 $ 187,000 $ 933,000
Dishman Mica Rehab Appleway Ave to 16th Ave Ciry n/a 096
• Wlontqomery Ave Rehab Argonne Rd to Universaty Rd city nJa 096
Euc11d Ave Rehab Sullivan Rd to Flora Rd Ciry Ne 096
0073,74,75 Stivimming Pool Upgrade Projed Park Rd, Terrace cew, 8 Valley Mission city Jun-09 1009b 146 $1,800,000 $ 2,522,000
Qesign Rrojects
oase Broadway Ave Reconstruction Moore Rd to Flora Rd T16 Oct-09 5% 0% $ 50,000 $ 2,198,000
nosa 441h Ave Pathway Sands Rd to 1NoodrufF Rd STP(E) Sep-09 096 0q6 $ 4,000 $ 355,000
oose Chfldrtn's Universal Park IWirabeau Point Park StatelCity Sep-09 0% 0% $ 150,000 $ 1,000,000
aOV Appleway/Sprague/Dishman Mica ITS Applewayl5prague I-90 to Univarsity CMAQ/ Apr-09 096 0% $ 47,000 $ 830,700
Dishman Mica, Appleway to 16th WSDOT
Sewer Pro)ects
oass Spaldings - Pavebadc Indiana West of Montgomery city 11l1/07 1009b d% $ 50,000 n/a
oav Grandvievr Acres - Pavebadc Butler to Cement, Fairview to Empire city 611107 100°b, 80% $ 7,300 Na
oosa Trentwood - Pavebadc Vercler to Evergreen, Trent to Wellesley city 611107 10096 80% $ 8,000 nla
aasi Rodo~+reflPSummerField Phase I- Paveback Radcwell, Evergreen to Sullivan city 11l1108 10096 6O/O $ 51,400 nla
oo7s Roclc+vell- Paveback Avalon to Aciams, Trent to Wabash City 11l1108 10096 6% $ 242,300 n/a
ooaa Summerfteld - Paveback Adartks to Sullwan. Trent to Olympic City 11l1108 10096 096 $ 258,900 n/a
0082 Suaers - Pavebadc Evergreen to Progress, 16th to 8th city 1111108 10096 096 $ 169,700 n/a
oosi White Biroh - Paveback Sullivan to Flora, 4th to Broaclway city 1111108 10096 096 $ 110,000 Ne
Othor Prolecta
Appleway Blvd (Emnrmmemai aasossmer,t) University Rd to Evergraen Rd STP(U) Qec-08 096 096 $ 64,000 $ 205,000
0072 Old Senior Genter Bldg Demoligon Mission Ave and Bwordish Rd city Jun-08 10096 096
Total E 7.545,318 $ 33,144,240
STP(U), (E) - Surface Transportation Program (Urban), (Enhancement); T16 - Transportgtion Improvement Board; BR - Broclge Replacement;
CDBG - Gflmmunity Deve9opmeM Blodc Grant Program; CMAQ - CongesUon ManagementJAir Quatity Program; STA - SpoJcane Translt Authority
Apr 2008 Construcdon Projects
MEiMO
~ TO: Dave Mercier, City Manager
FROM: Rick VanLenven, Chief of Police
DATE: May 12, 2008
RE: Monthly Report April 2008
April, 200$: April, 2007:
CAD incidents: 5,046 CAD incidents: 4,321
Reports taken: 1,590 Reports taken: 1,461
Traffic stops: 1,776 Traffic stops: 1,408
Traffic reports: 326 Traffic reports: 322
CAD incidents indicate ca11s for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Attached hot
spot maps show April residential burglaries, April commercial burglaries, April traffic collision hot spots and April vehicle prowling hot spots, along with March and April stolen vehicle and
recovered vehicle hot spots. ADMINIST.RAT.IVE: Q ♦ April was proclaimed by Mayor Munson as "Our Kids, Our Business" month, and Chief
VanLeuven and other SVPD personnel have participated in various related activities and
evcnts throughout the month.
♦ Several fundraising events benefiting children occurred this month in Spokane Valley,
including the annual MDA (Multiple l7ystrophy tlssociation) Lockup, Fted Robin "Tip a
Cop" for Special Olympics, and Chief VanLeuvEn took part in both events. He also
attended the annual Edgewood S.C.O.P.L. spaghetti feed fundraiser.
♦ Chief Van.I..euvEn continued to meet with representatives from Spokane Valley Fire
Departrnent, Spokane Fire District #8, Washington State Patrol and Department of
Emergency Management to final.ize plans for a unified command table top exercise (TT'X)
to test the newly-adopted Spokane County Evacuadon Plan. The TTX was scheduled for
May 13.
♦A1ong with other Spokane Valley staff, Chief VanLeuven participated in an "ethics in
govemmenY" audio conference.
♦ Chief VanLeuven met with Mike Stone, who was recently appointed as Parks and
Recreation Director, to discuss how the Spokane Valley Police Depa,rtment could work in
cooperation with I'arks and Recreation to best serve the community.
O ♦ The Chief addressed I7T Technieal Institute students regarding the topic, Police,
Corrections and Judicial Administration.
Page 1
♦ Dwing the month of April, Chief VanLeuven was "on call" for a total of 22 twelve-hour ~
shifts for patrol lieutenants.
CO1VI~1~lUNITY 0121ENTED POLICING:
♦ Officer Greg Snyder was named as Washington State Crime Prevention Officer of the Year
at the 2008 Washington State Crime Frevention Association Award Luncheon on Apri122,
where he was presented the Sandy Richards Award for this honor. Greg has been very
involved at the State level of the Washington State Crime Prevention organization for
several years and is a member of the board. Chief VanLeuven and Lt. Jim Finke attended
. the awards luncheon which was held in VJalla Walla.
♦ Chief VanLeuven attended the graduation ceremony for Spokane Regional Fire Recruit
Training Academy 2008 -1. ♦ S.C.O.P.E. was involved in the "Our Kids/Our Business" Campaign, distributing 1000
pinwhecls at stations and Operation Family ID (OFID) events.
♦ Trentwood S.C.O.P.E. hosted OFID and a Bicycle Safety rodeo for Honcywell Family
Days on April 19.
♦ S.C.O.P.E. members participated in "A Community Presentation on Gangs" at Broadway
Elementary on Aprii 30.
♦ Forty-six abandoned vehicles were tagged for impoundment in the Spokane Valley by
SCOPE volunteers, with 16 of the vehicles eventually towed and 16 citations issued.
Eighteen vehicle hulks were also processed in April.
♦ Volunteers from the four Spokane Valley S.C.O.P.E. stations (Edgcwood, University,
Central Valley and Trentwood) contributed 1,769.5 volunteer hours for the month of April.
♦ Chief VanLeuven Attended the 60`h Anniversary Celebration of Air Force Office of Special
Investigations. .
♦ The Chief participated in a planning meeting for an up-coming Domestic Violence Summit
to be held in June. The goal of the swmmit, with YWCA as one of the sponsors, is to form
a coordinated community response (task force) to domestic violence.
OPERATIONS: The week of April 21 through April 25 was a very busy one for the Spokane Valley Police Dcpartment. '1'he following paragraphs relate to a few of the specific incidents that oecurretl.
♦ Dishman Road Shooting
At about 9:00 p.m. on Monday, 04/21/2008, the Spokane Valley I'olice responded to the
1000 block of South Dishman Road on a report of a drive-by shooting. Upon their arrival,
Page 2
they learned that two males had foreed their way into a residence and pointed guns at the
O occupants. The residence was occupied by five adults, three males, and two females. A
large dog inside the home aggressively approached the suspects, frightening them away.
As the suspects fled, they fired numerous rounds in the direction of the home, striking it
several times. Many of the bullets penetrated the walls and lodged in various objects
within the home. Luckily, no one inside the residence was injured. Sheriff's major crimes
detectives are investigating.
♦ Broadway Home Invasion
Shortly after 1:00 a.m. on Wednesday, 04/23/2008, the Spokane Valley Police resgonded
to an apartment complex in the 11900 block of East Broadway aftEr occupants of an
. apartment there reported a home invasion robbery. An adult male and female reported that
they were at home with their infant child when four males kicked opcn their door and
entered their apartment. They reported that one of the males was armed with a shotgun
and another with a baseball bat. The victims were held at gunpoint in the living room
while the suspects searched the residence, apparently looking for items to steal. No one
was injured during the robbery. Items stolen during the robbery included a purse, wallet,
and laptop computer. Shortly after 2:00 a.m., Vallcy Police Corporal Pannell, acting on a
tip, located the four suspects at an address in the Spokane Valley. Further investigation
and interviews resulted in the arrests of three adult males and a 17-year-old juvenile. Each
was charged with one count of First Degree Robbery and one count of First Degree
Burglary.
O ♦ Vallcyway $urglary
A few minutES after 6:00 a.m. on Wednesday, 04/23/2008, a concernEd citizen called 9-1-1
and*reported what appeared to be a burglary in progre:ss at a residence in the 15300 block
of East Valleyway. Spokane Valley Police Officers responded and confronted hwo male
suspects, one of whom was armed with a handgun, carrying valuables from the unoccupied
home to their car. They detained the two and learned that a third suspect hRd fled on foot
when he saw the police approaching. Spokane Valley Detectives respondEd to assist the
patrol officers in processing the scene and locating thc third suspect. The homeowners,
who were out of town at the time, were contacted and confirmed thai the suspects were
burglarizing their home. The deteetives located thousands af dollars worth of personal
property that t,he suspects were in the Process of stealing. Thorough interviews of the two
suspects revealEd the identity of the third suspect. Investigators from the Property Crimes
Task Force located the third suspect at a residence in the Spokane Vallcy and took him inio
eustody. A11 threE suspects were residents of Spokane Valley. Each subject was arrested
on one count of First Degrec Burglary and eight counts of Theft of a Firearm.
♦ Mission Burglary'
At about 2:30 p.m. on Wednesday, 04/23/2008, in the 14100 block of East Mission, an
observant neighbor called 9-1-1 when he saw three subjects jumping his neighbor's fence
and entering the attached garage. He knew the occupants weren't home, so he approached
the residence to get a better look while remaining on his cell phonc with the 9-1-1 operator.
When the burglars saw him, two of them fled in the vehicle they had arrived in, while the
~ t.hird stole the victim homcowners' Dodge pickup that had been parked in the garage.
Spokane Valley Police Officer Joe Bonin spotted the fleeing pickup and attempted to stop
Page 3
it. The driver accelerated while Officer $onin pursued. The pursuit went from thc area of
Adams and iViission to 24th and Sullivan, where the suspect lost control of the pickup and
crashed through a fence. The suspect fled the crash scene on foot with officers in foot
pursuit. The officers lost sight of the suspect as he jumped fences going frorn one back
yard to another. Spokane Va11ey Patrol Officers and Detectives moved in and contained
the area. After an intensc search, the officers located and arrested a 23-yeaz-old male, who .
was charged with Residential Burglary and Attempting to Elude a Fursuing Police Vehicle,
both felonies. Further investigation by Spokane Valley Aetectivcs on Thursday,
04/24/2008, led to the arrest of the suspect's 21-year-old brother, who was booked on one
count of Residential Burglary. Detectives are continuing to investigate to determine the
identity of the third suspect. Anyone with inforrnation is urged to call the tip line at 242-
TIPS.
♦ Fursuit Nets Cash and Drugs
Shortly after midnight on 04l25/08, Spokane Valley Police were in the area of Trent and
McDonald looking for an assault suspect. A patrol officer spotted a Ford Exgedition and
driver that matched the suspect description and initiated a stop. The suspect immediately
fled. Spokane Valley Police pursued, assisted by Spokane County Sheriff's Officc. The .
suspect attempted to ram a Spokane County Sheriff s Office K-9 patrol car, but the
- collision Nvas averted by the deputy. The running vehicle was slowed by a successful
deployrnent of a spike strip in the azea of Forker and Frogress. With one flai tire, the
suspect bailed out of thc car while it was moving, causing the Expedition to collide with an
uninvolved parked car. After a brief foot chase, the suspect was taken into custody in the
area of Sullivan and Trent.
1
The suspect was identified as a convicted felon. In a backpack that the suspect was
wearing when arresled, officers found approximately 113 grams of inethamphetamine in
sepazate packages, hallucinogenic mushrooms, and marijuana. They also found electronic
scales, drug packaging material, and almost $17,000 in cash. In the suspect's vehicle,
officers found a handgun. He was booked into the Spokane County Jail for Attempting to
Elude a Police Vehicle, First Degree Felon in 1'ossession of a Firearm, Possession of a
Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver, Second Degree Assault (for attempting to ram
the patrol car) and Hit and Run - Unattended. The suspect was also booked on an
outstanding DOC Escape warrant, as well as a warrant charging him with tvvo counts of
Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intcnt to Deliver from a previous incident.
Cvief VanLeuven attended a presentation of SECTOR (statewide clectronic collision and ticket
online records) presented by Washington State Sheriff's and Police Chief (WASPC).
Panhandling:
' ♦ Chief VanLeuvEn was contacted by a citizen who wanted to express his opinion and
concerns regarding panhandling issues in the Spokane Valley. He provided various copies
of municipal ordinances from other jurisdictions, which the Chief passed on to the Valley legal department.
♦ It has been reported that azea convenience stores, parcicularly those neaz I-90 off ramps, are ~
being inundated with transients who are panhandling in the area, using the restrooms,
. Page 4
lrying to buy alcohol before and after hours, and causing a general disruption to the
businesses.
O ♦ Parks and Recreation Personnel discovered that a subJ'ect has becn sleePing in the men's
restroom in one of the Spokane Valley parks. Chief VanLeuven directed patrol officers to
roufinely check this park, and S.C.O.P.E. members will check this area also.
~
~
Page 5
O
2008 APRIL CRIME REPORT
Apr-08 Apr-07 1108 to date 07 to date 07 Total 06 Total 05 Total 04 Total
BURGLARY 67 4111 226 178 584 714 744 997
FORGERY 34 3811 127 143 365 334 464 465
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 92 12511 264 417 1,265 1,122 904 1,224
NON-CRIMINAL 75 8011 317 253 839 811 749 916
PROPERTY OTHER 75 81 265 303 890 982 1,154 1,665
RECOVERED VEHICLES 19 39 104 131 343 403 333 390
STOLEN VEHICLES 34 51 168 193 478 711 603 577
THEFT 155 135 569 608 1,881 1,888 2,256 2,853
UIOBC 0 1 1 3 8 11 8 10
VEHICLE OTHER 0 0 1 1 3 3 5 40
VEHICLE PROWLING 131 5311 412 246 682 937 958 1,382
TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 682 644 2,454 2,476 7,338 7,916 8,178 10,519
ASSAULT 84 70 289 261 853 846 894 880
DOA/SUICIDE 18 _ 23 87 75 221 , 167 159 164
. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 88 70 346 275 874 736 762 • 755
HOMICIDE 0 011 0 0 1 5 1 5
KIDNAP 1 1 9 6 23 22 35 24
MENTAL 36 24 118 111 350 425 425 .386
MP 7 6 26 19 83 88 97 106
PERSONS OTHER 127 120 429 426 1,337 1,159 1,256 1,624
~ ROBBERY 4 6 22 20 60 58 56 58
TELEPHONE HARASSNIENT 9 9 23 31 73 83 92 190
TOTAL MAJOR CRlMES 374 329 1,349 1,224 3,875 3,589 3,777 4,192
ADULT RAPE 4 2 20 14 43 29 39 37
CHILD ABUSE 11 13 60 42 104 78 101 126
CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 37 18 24 92 105 88 205
SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 2 1 4 3 6 4
INDECENT LIBERTIES 2 0 4 8 18 15 9 21
CHILD MOLESTATION 4 2 18 11 46 69 67 77
CHILD RAPE 5 211 14 6 31 62 35 30
RUNAWAY 32 2411 120 108 295 309 311 437
SEX OTHER 21 1611 80 66 194 203 181 162
STALKING 1 0 9 5 17 17 27 35
SUSPICIOUS PERSON 12 14 45 46 152 177 244 341
TOTAL SEX CRIMES 95 80 395 331 996 1,067 1,108 1,475
DRUG 100 86 315 298 807 665 891 999
ISU OTHER 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1TOTAL 1SU 100 86 315 299 808 665 891 1,000
TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 326 32211 1,333 1,223 3,800 3,345 2,403 2,776
TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,577 1,46111 5,846 5,553 16,817 16,582 16,357 19,962
O
Spatial Analysis/Hot Spots
CAD and RMS data is analyzed by a process called spatial analysis to create hot spot
density locations by specific call/crime typc for a specified time frame. A hot spot is a
condition indicating some form of clustering in a spatial distribution. The hot spot
depends on the proximity and number of incident points.
1 o create the hot spot a speci fic search radius is identif ed based on the number of
incidents in the data set. If there are over 150 incidents a search radius of 1000 feet is
used; 150 and under a search radius of 2500 feet is used. The spatial analysis soflware is
then applied to the data set and the results are classified into 6 classes using thc natural
breaks method. (This method has been recommended by the National lnstitute of
Justice's National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center). The top 3
classes arc then color coded with red, blue and grecn which represent the most
clustering/density of the data set.
After the hotsgot density locations are determined, analysis of specific number of
incidents making up the density hotspot is checked. If the hotspot location after analysis
continues to be a hotspot it is included in the analysis document that is sent along with
the hotspot maps to all commissioned deputies. -
1
We prepare six month density hotspot maps for deputies. This provides a larger number ~
of incidents and produces a betler hotspot representation for a specific area.
Examples: .
Monthly commercial burglaries have a relatively small total number pcr month. If a
business is burglarized twice in the same month, or two businesses within a couple of
buildings are burglarized it will show up as a hotspot. Due to the low number of actual
incidents making up thE hotspot it is not considered a true hotspot. For commercial
burglaries we recommend to the deputies to work off of the six month hotspot maps
because it gives a better picture of actual commercial burglary hotspots. Some months
there are a sufficient number of commercial burglaries within the hotspot area to includE
them as a hotspot. The analysis then also gives any information on day, time of month
and tune of occurrences, when it is given to the deputies.
Monthly vehicle prowling incidents are of a sufficient number that the hotspot densities
generally result in hotspot maps with aaalysis data sent to the deputies.
. ~
Analysis Information £or Hotspot Data
O April, 2008 Traffic Collisions:
1. See hotspot maps for loGations. The hotspot maps for traffic collisions include a11
collisions for the month and separate hotspot maps for traffic collisions that are for two
different time frames. First, 1900 to 0459 hrs and second, 0500 to 1859 hrs. This is to
separate the rush hour issues from the night issues.
Residential Burglary: 1. 4`hto 9`hSouth and 6000 to 6400 blk East. Four burglaries. One garage and three
residential. Sunday, Monday most often.
2. 1600 to 2100 blk North and 7300 to 7800 blk East. Four burglaries, One garage and
three residential. Day and time of occurrence varied.
3. 600 to 1100 blk South and 9500 to 10100 blk East. Five burglaries, Four residence and 1
garage. Day and time varied.
4. 13310 E Nlission Av. Four garage burglaries. All occuned on 4/18/08.
O Stolen Vehicles:
1. We looked at stolen trucks and cars only for the tirne geriod of 01/01/08 to 04/30/08.
2. Mission to Montgomery and Hutchinson to 9500 bllc East. 6 total vehicles takcn. 5 taken
in March and one in April. 7'here were 3 taken in February,in this area as well. One
IIonda Accord has not been recovered. All vehicles wEre recovered in Spokane Valley.
Three of the recovered vehicles werc recovered in this same area between 1 and 5 days
after it was stolen. Three Honda Accords Nvere taken. Fivc were taken from apartment
lots, 1 taken from a residence and 3 taken from business lots with two of those being
motels. Day and times vary. No arrests.
3. Sprague to 6`" and 10600 to 11400 blk East. 7 total vehicles taken. S taken in March and
2 tal:en in February. Three wcre taken from Sprague Av. One Toyota Corolla has not
been recovered. Three vehicles were recovered in Spokane Valley with one of those
recovered in the Montgomery/Argonne area. ?wo were recovered in Spokane City. And
One was recovered in Idaho. Two Saturn SC's were taken in this area. Two taken from
business parking lots, 4 taken from residenccs and 1 from apartment lot. Day and time
varies. No arrests.
4. The other riwo Spokane Valley City hotspot areas on the map only have one vehicle
~ stolen in April and three or four stolen in tVlarch.
5. For January - December, 2006 within Spokane Va11ey city the most likely vehicle stolen
is in the following order of preference:
a. I-Ionda Accord - 54
b. Honda Civic - 43
c. Satum SL - 32 ~d. Toyota Camry - 22
e. Ford Probe, Jeep Cherokee - 16
f. Toyota Pickup - 15 g. Nissan Sentra - 14
6. For January - December, 2007 within Spokane Valley city the most likely vehicle stolen
is in the following order of prcference:
a. Honda Aceord - 36 stolen
b. Honda Civic - 31 stolen
c. Toyota Canuy - 22 5~tolen
d. Satum SL - 16 stolen
e. Toyota 1'/LJ -11 stolen
£ Ford P/Ll, Chev P/LJ - 10 stolen
7. For January - April, 2008 within Spokane Valley city the most likely vehicle stolen is in
the following order of preference:
a. Honda Accord - 16 stolen
b. Honda Civic -11 stolcn
c. Toyota Camry, Satum ST - 8 stolen .
d. Satum SC - 6 stolen
8. For April, 2008 within Spokane Valley city the most likely vehicle stolen is in the
following order of prefErence: _
a. Honda Del Sol, Honda Prelude, Satum Sl, Satum SC, Toyota Camry, Toyota
Corolla - 2 stolen - 2 stolen
Commercial Burglaries:
1. The 2007 yearly hotspot maps for commercial burglary (posted at the same site) will
give a bettcr picture of consistent hotspots. . .
2. From Coleman to Vista Rd and Sprague to Broadway. We had four commercial
burglazies in April. Timc and day vary.
Vehicle Frowling:
1. 11200 to 11700 blk East and 2700 blk N to Trent Av. Eleven total vehicle prowlings.
The most common was overnight on Monday, Tuesday.
2. From 1100 to 1600 blk North and 12900 to 13400 blk East. Thirteen total vehicle
prowlings. Six occurrcd at the apartment complex at 13310 E Mission Av. All
occuned Thursday - Saturday, 4/17, 4/18 or 4/19. 3. From 10000 to 10700 blk East and 1300 to 1800 blk South . Nine total vehicle
prowlings. Most often Friday and Saturday overnight.
4. Frum 3200 to 3500 blk South and 1 block either directian af I3owdish Rd. Eive total
vehicle pmwlings. T=our of them on Bowdish Rd. All Tuesday Wednesday the
Bowdish rd ones were 4129, 4I30.
tiialicious MischieL•
1. The malicious mischief hotspots this montb are not hotspot ureas they each have thret
m:ilicious miuhief inridents that are in clase proximity of each other. Use the hotspot
maps for thilse area5 ati intiOrmation.
Recovered Vehicies:
1. 11600 to 12540 blk F-ase and Free%►ay to 2500 h!k':`orth. Towl of 7vehiclzs reco%,ered, 5
- Msrch and 2 - Apri l
1 ~ ,
Canv n ~,O , CV.nt ol c
7 Jofie Sanso kiwn
= c3` z v`~ 2 ~ W _ sby
a, ? weu Ie o
R
vor so 9 ~
T Q I d r . ~q $ ~
- - - .f R ~ cJ'
p
ny' 1~ EucUd
r ~
tebe F Irv Eu Id
t
c i
x erick
ry
J ~
^19~ _ s
d1 lanQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
nOX ( in L @ sslon
.E~tttii a - SZ
60"
L~as~on Misaian Ci11H o
G► ~ i•• - fl ~
no Shorp
~ ~ ~ - ~ I.^•. L- ~ _ - lu_ s
►,iz-.N,-;~
~ - •t~,~, ~~-~a , ~
~ Alk
, . - nr]~u~-,~ d
,dE+ ~19 i
p n ~ " t~ ~ - ~ ~ " - ~y _ , I . ,r L - • ~ `-Q
iJl IC r C ~ t- rU -.T-j~~r~'= i t _~.•-5-- 1 ~ / - S AU1
T ~
, ~ _ v . ' U,~ 1- _ Elu , 6
'
„~n
~l_- x ~ _ izin ~ ~s c3
r • - ~
POI
~ i- ' 1 - 1~ 1Bih T ~ 3 - D
^ , f? r~ 'L~ Y
- 4 Ir-•~~ r ~
St ~J'' iZ}Y
21st ? = yonn ~ . T 32nd
251h a 2n ~
e
$h tn 3 ~
= r 31 st ,n Q y~ ~ ~ TJ ~4th R ~ tdT rn
- ~ 10 401 'Batkt Tort s a
37t N s Traftic
m ~ N Bol 441h ~ COlIiSiOft
a j ~
~
3rd ~ 44th U 6 :I
c 4 lh ~j ( EM LOW
o ^ . r 111111111IMedium Lau
-a ~ a ai o
111111111IMedium
, rre
~High
f ~ ~
° ' 2 M'' 2008 April Traffir r'ollision Hotspots ~A ~'►nduced 13 h~y 2D08 ~
c le,nn n con
O
p 5anso
7 4 2 ~
, .
2
.2- ~
F ar o
f~
~ ~ h
- U riw r - . ~ °r °ie
-i
m
fhv~,n , v;-T '.r C k ~ $EuG11d
mP` ~ ~ 3
~ i ~1 ~D~I ~ ~ ~'f ilt~ irebe • _ E Id
,---T Mp d qfi' , d e
"c IFN
j•
-OL-
-I-
r I m
salo
_~:i l~ ~F~ ~ .b,~t~li~• ' ~ 7 m in
B .i~lf)!~7 I p1 ~ , / ~ - -a J~ 3 E ~ _
B
7
S iJ. i •111~ _ I ~,VG^'~Vt~l~~' ~i1 ' ~n [
~
An - ~ , f , ~ - r - ~
n NL'~ _ t 1
4 . Tl ~ 4 tJ~(7 I.IH C Z ~ 4
Id
t7 n Y~~ - - ~ ! - " --1`. _ ~ 3M
-L ~
{ ~:~di~r. - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m - ~u`i~ - ~ l ' 3
I
~ `"'r -1•- .
h
_ 7 1 t lRit%
1g -
~
°itN
_ --.--Z ~U; ' 2101 a~ ~t LS f'►' ~ m 32n4
- -j ~ 4 251h ~ 2n ~
~
= ee c ' ~ y 3 ~th th 3 I - l
- 31.t rot1 C) ,
3 r ~ ~ O t!~ ~ 4Ot „ ge119 To ~
37u Tratflc Collisbns
_ Q m~ LL ea+ Mth 1900 to 0469 hra
~ LT g 3 a
~ ~ 441h A lh
~ c OLow
~
n =Medium Low
~ ~1{lirre R~,k ~!'.~t 14}p ~ ~ ~ =~'dIUlT1
~ High
~
; : ; uN 2008 April Traffic Collision Hotspots Mep Producact 13 May 2008 ~
w.~~~J
- ~ R u - Fc~ a8 a l
Jbee b $ a~~ SunB n
- _ ~ 7
1-~ cii
~,I S 9n ~ Weil le v ~
~~yl r ~ J~p~~ w m R
U wr ~ ee 3L e
D
e EuGli4
tnV~ ~ d k ~ ~
~rabe ~ Eu tIU ~ Bu o ~
T:1Q~► aiMiw 0
=A j•~( PfI1.R I ~-~_.I 1 ~Y j 1 ~ 1 _ ~_-L- - Jl ~ ``t, r.~~ 19~ f ~ r,j
c;Uh
P l 1=' 1i ~~-r Jw~► - } M ns
u .1c1, Q n~ d ~ -
j` rJ -Q 5~~ 1F ~ssion
. L1fIl1 Ok5~- ~ - r r!; t _ ",.1 _ r ~ ~
AS' `tl-i~
'"r`:"' L _ , I i , r~~~ a ~ - l a ~ •
ZZ Mssion har
~ L::r! b~ c:ata o
_ t ~
IQI55 71 TD Ii1~{~~-. ~~I _ ~~_i f ~
_.e orte 7Shn►p c
r
~ ~ t- h•I-~ ~ '{~'yr p~,
~l:(fl "
`1-]~
~ -
m a ~
N
yw
1 ' • - . ti ;.~i , : ~r i
~ -k~
' JfARa~ ~ de arr,~1
.R~i;i~K ~ .r• ~ W -'c ' - ~ ~jh ,A, r~~,,~. .€R~ -.t. 3 J - 6th 1 -I~ y~OT '
_F ~ _ --y~UL-~ UIIi~ ; ~ , ! n~ ~
1 I 1itt er
t2m -4
„
44!
(N ~ -1 _ f ' _ i ~ ~ y ~ G ~ 15l
v 21st 32nd
7 O 25th ~ ~ '1 ^ , ~ ' ~ T'1~ • a2
~ lY L~ ~
t~ ti 0
- z r 31 at T ~ Q ~ ~ _ ~~,~L~, ~ gg►A o n ~ ~
t 3 e
1 O 40t gelle TaR s 3
- ~6► a' 37 ~ Traffic ColRsions
~C - s,~~.~~
0500 to 1869 hrs
6) +t~fa (n 44liti g°
o
. ~ . ~ aa~n a n, s n 0 Low
ic / :r
=Medium Lov►r
ire ROC+F =Medium 4CrjD Moq~
2 ku• 2008 April Traffic r'~llision Hotspots htiap Pmduced 13 F• ~8 ~
i - V
Ciemvn
F 9"s a L~ ti~
Joee ~ ~ ~ 40 9a~rs wn ~
6kY.. r
ffi ~ wer ie v r
- aU 68 ~
u
L
r~~'~rsvay Eudld
A t E~`S" . 8
- g 'ICO~ rnbe► F i E id
mw ..t.- a~ U1i
.
_-1 r eiiCk Pf 11 y
r' l'
~ I n i ; • ~i~ ~Tn ~ `l ~ ~ ~ l-~~ • ,i -L.: ~~c11n~3 _ ~ I ~d e ~
114 O~ . . i ~ - ~ i ~~:uw • ' ~ ' - - r -1 L~' r ~ ssim
~ n-
kon go
Cef9 0
Is5lon tp, '~b ~ I ~ nT ~ 1 ` i
,tJN% - -I- 4 i
9
a- 4 n i
do td
( f x 3'"
ttr
111h p
~:_l • ' I i cl. 121h
- m h F. ~ tl ~ < r 4s
3 - ' ~ ~ ~ G
4 1 c1
~ _ ' ~ i I • 1 ~ ' 101h I ~ -i 1T -7 u Oi
41
'
~
bD
~ w m
7~.;1,- t 4 ro . I 32na
251h 2n
- t_ z 3tst ,n y a \ ~1"iti ~ ~r 39u, '-N
m ' p •1i:1 g811BTlft ~ 3~
_ 37t ~ v 1, S • ..~t, ' N ~t ~ RBa(eRtal
Burglary
c, ot 44~' ~
' A Ifi 8
rd ~ O7 441h cn r--I ~
I ~ Q ~~.OW
9
mMedium ,
M High ~
1 1 • 1~ ~~-.WtLI, 1 ~ 1
2008 April Residential Burglary Hotspots WP Pmduced 13 May 2fl08 ~
Spokane Valley Residential Burglary
- - - - - - -
100
i
so - - ~
ao - - - - - < -
%
~
70 _ ~
2003'
so - - -
--s-2004 ~
~b-2005 .
50 - - - ~ 1-2006
2007
40 - i -0-2008
30 - - - ' - -
20
10 - -
0
JAN FE8 MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Garage Burglary
50 ~ - ,
i
as - -
i - - ~
40
/
~
35 ~ - - -
30 ~ - - - ~--2003_.
~ --w-2004
4-2005
25 ~ - - - - - - - ,-"-2006
-f,- 2007
I
20 - - -O-•2008
15 - - - - - - - - - - -
10 - - - - - ~
_.3
5 - - - - - -
0 • - - r -
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
~•'1 10
I oA
Clnrrnn Cen
o s
l
Jaso D + t o 5nt~so~+ k a s
~ 6 ~ T
7 S - - ~
? = ~ ~9S rn ~ Wop le ~ o
1 I n ~ f tr_ _
iu
U r a be
-
- tly @ Eudid _I_
. ~ • ~JI. - -
iraDe F I ~ Eu Id ~ Ou a
e1 +ck
vefB
~~Iflil ~_`~1 ~ T •.~M ~ ~ ~ ~
Cd{8 O
! ~ r:la•- ~,'~.r
~ 5he►p I . 1 ~ : i u a _ j -
~ i
(
.1 -
t B o 1..►~ ~ til 1 i~,_ a7~wt, ~J~~iir_• a-~ 1 T~i -•"l("~ _i _ i r- ~ ~
44 ~ - ~ ' t ~7 1 I T ' i +t ' _ i - ~ ~ ~ t : ~ ~ j n~
nr~„I,~ 4
J I~ a u~ ~
O n 7 ii,~
~
~n
Kid J- : T l~ ~ x 11m
' l4 h c ~ 1 h-l ~ G
151
Alk
18lh
q
~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ' . : zn ~
m 25th
- a ih
Ih
X f) 1
- - C 35n1
1 U getfa Te
n
J- a m ~ -Y ''-r• 1.i~ { s 3 ~ $tOlefl
- 37t Vehlcles
(n o~ 44th ~
44m ~ < tn
c ,o Low
~ t-
~ a a f Z ~ x
=Medium
p 3
~ fre "T t ~~0~°st :23 'M°~ IIIIIIIIHlgh
~ t ; 7 Uw 2008 March & April c*,)len Vehicle Hotspots WPproduce, 13 -08
~
Spokane Valiey Stolen Vehicles
90 - - -
• _
80
70 - - ~
/
60 - - -
2403
50 - - {-2404
~ -*-2005
-00-2006
- - - - - - - - - I -e3-- 2007
40
1-4-2008 I:
30 i
20 '
10
p - -JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
I ~ I ' V I y 1 ~ +
r ,
I Clarro.n _--I 'J Cen
, m L
7 ,bse C ~c Sanso wn
a
_ ~'~r 2
d
9PR~95 tn - _ 'Neu le
R a m p ` ~
1 ~ ~ r U Y0f Q O
1 d
G C
EudIC
I d k c
irtiUe Irv u~ Eu Ed
'r Bu e a
- rkk _ - ~ }I ~"1 ~ ~ ist~►~ ~z.
d n d a~ -t-
'
0p
~ Ctm ~n.op• ~ `l~ , li,; TT":
►on
u
~ ro Micalon Catn o
scEUn
n . D•--~g _ - o ~ „ R ~ `
1 ' : • ~ ;harp
~
8 13 T ~ . ; ~ y'ni►~ ~ 9
pr A~ _ ,Z T
n
n
- ~
~a - 4 T ~ ! ~ l
- CJ C)
af'
T
111h • } 9
121h
~
1 _ = , 3 ~ , ~ - ,r , ~
t►l h _ - _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ pDfl isl
~ C -
4
sn _
~ a
~ 21 ai Jenn
32tx1
Zfl
} ~ m ~
th - 0
~
_ ~ 31 gt T ~ Q ~ ~ 59th ~
3 0
~ 441 geile Terr 0
_ 3
- D
- - ~ ~ ~ 10 com„ericel
- 97l m N ~ ~ . I
Q 3 -`r- ~ r Baf 4dlh g' j 8urglary
rc -
a tn 15
35 3 ~ aatn
q " 3 iC q, ,o s -
ro sn ~ ~ r 111111111 LoW
~
~
~ ; cu ; ~Medium
. . ~ ~~i!i!e 1 • ~sr ` Mo 1 =High h
~ r
c , 2 M,° 2008 April Commer ' 1 Burglary Hotspots NWPPrpductd 13May200R ~
Spokane Valley Commercial Burglary
so I
so -
ao - - - i
- o 2003
I
, I --•-zoaa
~-2005
30 - - - - -0-■2006
2007
~ --a- 2048 I
20 - - - - - - - - - - -
10 - -
I
, - - - , I
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Vehicle Prowling
250 - -
200 - - - ~
~
150 - ~ - oz
- 2003I
--s-2004
-dr-2005
-44-2006
~
100 - - « - - - - 2008
I ~
50 ' - -
i
0 , . , , .
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Malicious Mischief
300 I
i
250 - -
200
~ e- Zoa3'
/ ~ 2004
f-2405
150
9 2007
,
--0-2008
100 • -
.
- - - - L
50
Ol
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Calis
aooo ~
3500 • - - -
.
~
3000
/
- . ~ - -
2500
_ i - 2003
' I -f- 2004
~-2005
2000 -N"-2006
2007
-0-2008
1500 -
1000 , - -
I
500 I, - -
Q - - - , - - - - • -
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Theft
500 - - -
450
-
400 /A\
350
~ Y
2003
300 - - ~ -
f 2004
-f-2005
250 -11-2006
-9- 2007,
200 - ~j ~ 2008 I
~
150 - - 100
-
50
0 -
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Vailey Self initiated Incidents
4000
3500
-
3000
~A
2500 ~ - = - -
♦ - 2003
-f- 2004
, -
' - ~-2Q05
2000 - - ~
-*0-2006
2007
~ ~-2008
1500 -
I
1000 _
500
~
Q~ . . -r ,
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Robbery
14 I
12 - - - - ~
10 I
-
2003
8 - - - - - - - - - -W- 20Q4
~ 2005 I
-*0-2006
\ - --e 2007
g . - - - - - - - ! 2008
\
~
z~ - - -
~0
. , _ - ~ . JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Forgery
ioa .
90
\ \
80 -
70 ~60 -+-2003
. -6-2DQ4
-*--2005
50 ` -0"-2006
2007
QO , - - - --0-2008
30 r'' - - - -
-
20
10 • - i
I
0 , . . '
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG 5EP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley DV's
250 ; - - - -
200
i
-
:
~i
150 - - - - - - 0- 20031
2004
-dr-2005 I
mm"-2406
-fr- 2007
2008
100 -
50 i - - 0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spakane Valley Drugs
140 9 20 = - . - e
--4-- ~ 003
~ 2004
$~l - - - - - --e -W-2006
,t.
--t4 2GCI7
~2~}08
6~
I {
40
20
- - - ~
~ - , - - - ,JAN FEB MAR APR ftillAY JUN JLJL AUG SEP [3CT NOV aEC
Spokane Valley Assaults
120
- - -
100
~
~
ao - -
2403
-0- 2004
~-2005
60 ' - - -0-2006 I
i --+y-- 2007
--0-2008 I
40
20 :
0
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Adult Rape
8 - -
7•- -
6 - - -
b - ~ - - - -
,
' 2003
~
-f-- 2004
~-2005
q - _ - - - - - - - --"-2006
2007
3 -0-2Q08
- - - - - , ~
2
ti
1
, - - -i~ - - - - -~l -
~
o
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV pEC
Spokane Valley 15A
900
i
800 ~ - -
700 - - - - -
600 ~ - - - -
2003 I
500 - - - - - - -g-2004 ~*-2005 '
- - - *~2006 I
400 - - -e--2a07I
2008 300 - - - - - 200
100
0 - - - . - - - , - - - - - JAN FE8 MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
SELECTED DATA SPOKANE VALLEY
01101107 TNROUGH 04130107
2 3' 4 5 8 TOTA
CAD INCIDENTS 3,5524,830 2,072 2,602! 1,482 2,774, 17,312
TRAFFICSTOPS 1,289 1,8611 581* 795 357 1,067: 5,930
ACCiDENTS 1441 275; 917 101 59 1451 815
STOLEN VEHICLES 51 41; 23 39 17 22 193
VEHICLE RECOVERED ! 31 29 20 18; 10 18 126
BURGLARY ; 45 34 32 21 15 31 178
-
ROBBERY i 2 45 4 2 3 20
THEFT ~ 99~ 113 97 125 851 89, 608
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF I 56, 71 1011 74 611 541 417
VEHICLE PROWLING I 31 84 52' 51 15 33 246
.
- f • - -
01101l08 TH OR UGH 04130/08 i
,
! 1 24 3 4,~ 5 6'TOTA
. .
GAD INCIDENTS 3,912 5,556 1,934 2,766 1,597 2,967~ 16,752
TRAFFIC S70PS 1,467 2,281 477 775 376 989~ 6,365
ACCIDENTS 160 252 75, 109 40 208 84
STOLEN VEHICLES 35 44 20 36I 8 25; 168
VEHICLE RECOVEREO 26 29 7 16
fi 14 98
BURGLARY 60 54 34 371 20 i 21 226
ROBBERY 3 7 21 6` ZI 2 22
THEFT 101 95 80 142 ~ 60 811 569
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 511 48 46. 41 ~ 351 43- 264
VEHICLE PROWUNG 311 101 95 104 48 33~ 412
I
_ _ , _ - •
I
- I
- - }
03/01/07 THROUGH 03/31107 1 2 31 41 51 6'TOTAL
CAD INCIDEfYTS 1,005 , 1,263 509 720 ~ 429 738 i 4684
TRAFFIC STOPS 360 467. 156. 208 100, 268' 1559
ACCIDENTS 29 611 21 241 191 34 188
STOLEN VEHICLES 9 12 8 9 10 a 52
VEHICLE RECOVERED 131 7 4 5 2 334
BURGLARY 8! 10 6, 6 5 6 41
ROBBERY - 0• 1 1~ 2- 01 - 2- 6
THEFT 1 32' 32 18, 44 30 21 177
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 11 22! 25' 14 14* 1Y, 98
VEHtCLE PROWLING 3 13' 13 i 13 21 2 46
I ~
o513ros
SELECTED DATA SPOKANE VALLEY
~ i
103J01108 THROU'GH 03/31/08 I
_ a - , -
2~; . 3i 4 5 6,TOTA
CAD INClDENTS 1,058 1,5381 485 657 _ 402T 792' 4932
TRAFFIC STOPS 408 6641_ 117 171 I 102 254' 1716
ACCIDENTS 35, 701 19 28 12' 381_ 202
STOLEN VEHICLES 11 18 8 15 2 9~ 63
VEHICLE RECOVERED 10i 12. 21 61 2 3' 35
BURGLARY 14; 12 7 7 5 4r 49
ROBBERY 31 0 11 7
TNEFT I 23 25 17 37 20; W. 138
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 15 15 13' 13~ 5' 8_ 69
VEHICLEPROWLING 12 30 27~ 22' 14 9 114
04/01107 THROUGH 04/30/071
- _ ,
1 2` 3 4I 5~ 6 TOTAL
CAD INCIDENTS 832 1,237 526 654 353 719 4321
TRAFFIC STOPS 275 457 131 183 68 294 1408
ACCIDENTS 37 6716 17 16 28 181
STOLEN VEHICLES 21I 10l 4 8 44~ 51
VEHlCLE RECOVERED B 6 5 3 2 8j 30
--BURGIARY 7 12 13 0 2 71_ 41
ROBBERY 0 2 21 1 1; 0 6
-T}{Eff 1424 31 21 131 32 135
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 16~ 1828 21 18 24 _ 125
VEHICLE PROWLING ? 10 18 6 2 10 53
04/01108 7HROUGH 04130I08
--T-- -
1-~ - - 21 3 ' 4 ` - 5 g 7OTA
CAD INCIDENTS 1,070ftliC5 4 46 6 fi21 4161 8085048
TRAFFIC S70PS 4139 93 ! 2121 971 302 1776
ACCIDEN7S 20 46 15 19' _3 36' 139
STOLEN VEHICLES 8 6' 8'; 21 8~ - 34
VEHICLE RECOVERED 8 3 3 4 ,4! 20
BURGLARY 18 13f 13 13 5 5 67
ROBBERY 0 31 Oi 1 ~ 0 0~4
-t}{EFt 28 281 31, 27 17 24 155
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 181 141 151 111 18i 18;, 92
VEHICLE PROWLING J 8 35 361 19 9! 131
p5/13108
SELECTED DATA
(ALL)
L _ I 04/01107 THRQUGH 04130/07
p! 1 2! 341 51 6 7 8 9 10; 11 12 13 14, 15 TOTAL
CAD INCIOENTS 799832 12237! 528 6541 353 719 749 391 359 3441 526 6221 777 516 280 9,684
TRAFFIC STOPS N/A - 275 4571 131, 183 68 294 297 137 110 151 143 282 341 188 98 3,153
ACCIDENTS --(N/A 3-1 671 16~ 1711 16 28, 23 10 14* 7 24 19. 24 15 12 329
STOLEN VEHICLES 21 ~ 101 4i 8j 4 4' 3 7 8 1 1 5T- 4 0: 1 81
VEHICLE RECOVERED ~ _ 7 6 61 5; 31 2 S~ 2 6 31 1 1 7; 1 1; 2 61
BURGLARY ~ N/A 7' 12 13~ 0 2 7) 16 4 5; 3 3 13~ 13 8 6 111
ROBBERY IN/A 0 2 2~ 1; 1 0 2 0 10 0 0` 0 00 8
THEFT ~NlA 14 24 31 21 13 321 15 11 19; S 8 2622 13 4 262
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF ' N!A 16; 18 28 21 18, 24! 11 8 14!5 2 16 13 11, 8 211
VEHICLE PROWLING IV/A 7i 10 186 21 10 0 0 3 5 0 4 17 6 1 89
- ~
-
I I I
~ 104l01/08 THROUGH 04130/08 ( I
- T ~ , _
0'' 1 L_ 2 3 4 51 6 78 9 10 11 12; 13 14 15 TOTAL
CAD INCIDENTS 863! 1,0701 1,524 466 762 416i 808 860462339 286 529 655! 760 530 322 10,652
TRAFFIC STOPS N/A 4131 659 931 212; 97 302 432~ 214~ 89 82 110; 259~ 280 190 145 3,577
ACCIDENTS N/A 20 48 15 19 3 36 30 8' 8 18 34. 13~ 15! 8 8 281
STOLEN VEHICLES WA 6 4 6 8 2 8 6. 3' 4 2 2 5, 4; 0 OI 80
VEHICLE RECOVERED 3 8 3 3 4 0 4 22; 0 7 0l 2' 2 0 01 32
BURGLARY NIA 18 13 13 13 5 5 13 7; 7 7 2! 8 9; 3 4. 125
ROBBERY ' N!A 01 3 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Of 0 0 5
THEFT ~N/A 28T- 281 31 27 17 24 20 10 13 14 5 35 26; 14 1j 2g3
MAUCIOUS MISCHIEF N/A 16; 1415~ 11 18 18' 8 4 171 6~ 0 11 18. 8 31 167
VEHICLE PROWLING N/A d 28 35' 361 19 9 6 8 8 6 11 0 31- 0 1i 190
05/13!(l8
SELECI DATA
(ALL)
03101107 THROUGH 03131/07
Oi 1 2 3 4; 5 6' 7 8! 9 10, 11 12 13 141 15 70TAL
CAOINCIDENTS 880' 1,005 1,283 509 720 ; 429 738 768 422 325 294 532 518 784 ' 513 j 230 9,950
TRAFFIC STOPS N/A 360~ 467 156, 208! 100 268 304~ 175105 81 116 240 295 174; 931 3,142
ACCIDENTS N/A 29 61 21 ~ 24' 19 34 391 14, 8_ 171 26 14 33 12! 7 358
STOLEN VEHICLES N/A , 912 8 9' 10 A 5' 51 5 2 4 2 5 5; 4 89
VEHICLE RECOVERED 15 13 7 4; 5~ 2 3 7 7 3 11 2 2 2 0 0 73
BURGLARY N/A 810 6 6 5 8 9 T 0 8 9 4 7 12 _ 8{ T 103
ROBBERY N/A 0~ J1. 1' 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
THEFT ~ N/A ' 32 321 18~ 441 30 21 18 13 14 9 4 33 24 1571 3 310
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF N/A 11 22 251 14j 14 12 10 9 10 5~ 71 14 11 81 3 175
VEHICLE PROWLING N/A 3 1313( 13 2 2 3 8 5 7 11 5 18 3; 0 _96
I
~ 03/01108 THROUGH 03/31/08
. I
i I
0 1 2 31 4. 5 6 7 81 9 W 111_ 12 i 13 14 15 TOTAL
CAD WCIDENTS 8961 1_058 1,538 485-1 657~• 402 792 - 798 437 349 324, 74 5491 662 419: 262 10,127
- - - -
TRAFFIC STOPS_ _ N/A 1 408 664 117 171 ~ 102 254 _ 348- 207 125 101, 961 212 309 139 111 3,362
ACCIDENTS N/A ' 35 70 19 28+ 12 38 39 10. 15 18; 65 47 28 21. 11 454
STOLEN VEHICLES 'N/A 11 18: 8 15; 2 9 1 1! 0 1 1 3 7 2 0 79
VEHICLE RECOVERED 31_10 _T2 6 2 3 3 2~ 1 Oi 0 1 5 0 0 50
BURGLARY N/A 141 121 7 7 5 4 8 2I 7 9i 1 6 14 4 6 106
ROBBERY N/A 3' 1 j a 2 0 10~ 0' 0 0~ 0 2 1 0 0 10
THEFT N/A I 231 251 17 37 20 16 121 9 20 7i 8 24 30 10 2 258
MAI_ICIOUS MISCHIEF j WA I 15 15 13 13 5 8, 10, 12 9' 11 4 13 16 8 2 152
VEHICLE PROWLING N/A 12 30 27 22 14 9 12 5 3; 9 3 7 39 0 2 194
i
, ~ - ~ -
05/13/06
SELECTED DATA
(ALL)
i 01/01/07 THROUGH 04/30J07 I
- - I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 9 10 11; 12 131 14 15 1 TOTAL
CAD INCIDENTS 3003~3,552 4.830; 2,072 2.602 1,482 2,774 2,806 1.4701 1.257! 1,191 2,042! 2,112 2,953; 1,738 858; 36,742
TRAFFIC STOPS N/A 1,269 1,861; 581 795 357 1,067 1,089 550, 373 - - 365 407; 923 1,127 537 275; 11,576
- - - - - - - - • - - -
ACCIDENTS N/A 144 275' 911 101 59 145 169 44 60 76i 2721 135 147 86 64; 1,868
- _ -
STOLEN VEHICLES N/A 51 41 23 39 17 22 17 20 21 4 9 10 18] 9 5 306
VEHICLE RECOVERED 39 31 29 20 18! 10 18 14 20, 10~ 6 14 11 12 5 4: 261
BURGLARY N/A 453a 32 21 ! 15 31 42 7; 18' 17 14 38 38 24 20, 396
ROBHERY N/A 2~ 4 _5i 42 3 20' 1 0 0 1_ 1! 1~- 26
THEFT I~/A 99 113 97` 125 85 89 71 , 40 55~ 34 34 94 99 44 22; 1,101
MALICIOUS MISCHlEF NIA ~ 56 71 101; 74, 61 54 381 231 49 19 18 43 55 29 15; 706
VEHICLE PROWI.lNG N/A 31 64 52! 51~ 15' 33 91 15j _ 18. 251 4 15 58 9' 1' 398
' _ I
01/01/08 THROUGH 04130/08
I I i ~
i
0, 1 2 3l 4 5 --6 7! 89 101 11 12 13 14 15 TOTAL
CAD INCIDENTS 2906'~ 3,912 5,556 1,9342,786 1,597,2,967 3,137' 1,630 1,275 1,192 2,199 2,277 3,071 1,719 1,013 39,171
TRAFFIC STOPS N/A ' 1,467 2,281 477! 775 376i 9891 1,392 730 376 293 309 753 999 502348 12,068
_ ACCIDENTS N/A ~ 160 252 75~ 109 40' 208 19255 74 98 391 1911 186 110' 78 2,199
STOLEN VEHICLES N/A 35 44 20; 3 6 8 ! 25 t 1 i 148 4 5 15' 18 5i 4 252
VEHICLE RECOVERED 11 26 29 7, 16 6 14, S 10, 3 31 7 13 1~ 1 156
BURGLARY [V!A 60 54 34 37 20' 211 35 19 20, 18 10 25 40 16 16 426
•
ROBBERY N/A 3 7 21 6_ 2 2 1 0' 0 0 0 4 3 1 2 33
- - - - - -
THEFT N/A 101 95 90' 142 601 81 55 33 49 34 19 110 109 39 7 1,024
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF N/A 51 48 46 41, 35' 43 341 36. 39~ 30 13 38 54 19' 7 532
VEHICLE PROWUNG N/A 31 101 95 104 48, 33 30 13 14 33, 5 15 111 Oi 3 636
I ' I
_ i
~ - - ' • - -
05113/08
2008 APRI~ CR 3 BY CIT~~S
Wi 101 DP Fc Ir•r GAII It.L Iv1L jM W Kr IsM Wa spK !SV ~wAV 'Ibial
~3{.GRt~LAR4~ 0 2 iij 1 0: D 0 ~6 6 30 0l 2 67; D 127
Fd~RGLRY 2i D CI 0 a 0! 21.- 2 o.; 20 0 0 34 D (10
Ni rtL Nt I~CH la_B° I D 4 i « 0 2; 4~ p ny~ 6 l 0 3 92 0 170
TICDN-CRllulINr11. 3 a $ {T 0 il 2e o, 2 0 49 0 13 ~ 7~ 0 147
F'ROf' OT1 GE[t 21 Q 5 1 f1 {I 6~ 9 0 7~ iF 13 75 p 264
ItC'R'VD 4'E 1 -I 1 D 0-- 0 - Oi a f! -[1 1 0 11 0 19 Q~ 34
S-1 L v I°: I-I _1 - 0 0 C] 4} 0 0 ~l 1 0 24 0 2 34 01 _ 62
'CHL•f-T- - ~ 14 0 S. I, ol D 4 5 {D 104 0 4 155 Q' 297
U113 { 1C - i0 1 il U. [l ~ D, 11 00 U 0 p 0 0 0 q 0
r~~E iE N3`i~lt ~ G o~- o Oq o ai - 11 1 0 2 0~ a; ol o
VE-i-! i"ROWL D, {k ii il' ~D D I {l 0, 0 58 IM~ 2~ 1311 0 I92
~ 1 17 14 15 ' 0 45A GI 43 ~ 682°: 0 1,2!9f
Iffma 45';_ 0 203 fl
r1S5AUL"f f' D 6 0 k-00 On 0 UU1 58 1 3 84 D 1S~M
b 1 0 UOp 4 [l 21 _ fl 0 1.8 Ib 45
I)V to =a 3 0 D 33 0 0---Gd 0 0 88 0 171
F~~[?~rll~'I[7E 0 D 0 0 -0 0 0 ~ - 0 0 Q _ I il {6 0 0~._ _1
KiDNAI" Q_ D' o Q ol 0 0 G i~ 0 I ~ 0 _ 1 fl' ?
h1E~1'~'Al.. 0 = Dp I ~ 1 {?l 0 0 U 2 ~0 14- 0 1 -~fi (1' 55
Mr, 0 ~ o 01 iol o, ID a G ca _ Q 8 0 7 _is
- - - - ~ ~
I'ER~ r5-rElEit S i 11 2' 2 101 D lb_ I27 4]_ 274
- - - - . - _
fl 0 0 0 G` 0 0 a o. a Q 0 4 a 5
,].L•"L4Iri.RA S 5 D 0 2! 0 A a ~ 0 0 ? 0 0 9 _ {l 18
~201 24 3 0~ a 6 4 7 d 2 276 11 37 1 374 --0 741)
micilimpm r4 DU L'!" Rr3, E'F ~ i} 0 0 0 [i ; D 0 0 01. 0 S 0 11 4.- 0 I[}
CHl1,i) Af317S~ 0 0 0 ~ if} ~ 90 0 0 0 tio g~0 0~ l l' 0 ?I
CUST IN'1"f TR R 0 U 0 0~ 0 0 i, 0 0 0 8~ [l al 3 il ~11
SL":X REGIS F 0 43 0 a il Q UoI o o- - 0 i U i [I D I
f'JD LIBF'R"FY 0 0 0 0 Q I]I 0 0- -4 b 0 2 0 2
)afOLLSJC #IlI.T1 0 4 i 0 ..0 ~ [I, . il 0~ 0 CI 7 _(M 0 4 0 12
Fi- +'[:r'~j~li~f? 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 (it s 5 O, l(I,
R U N AWt1 `r' Cl 04 i} 0 Ii ti l 0 0 0 35 ( 0 d} 32 fl 67
f~ fI~ 0 Z 11 t~: 45
51-k1'11FR ? 01 2 0 0 a i ] 0
Sl"A1-K1NG v 0 o! d 0 il 0 1 0 0 U 2; f} 0 1 _ _[li aF
S~ 0 0 0. la Q 0 0 0 I ! ls 0 0 12 Q 2!7
. a ~ o a ~ ~ i ~ 1 0~ r~ a~ 95 n 21: I
f~~t d~ ~ U ~ .l 0 2 0 36 q 100 ~ 0 - 157
. 0 j f} 0
15 L.I 0 F 1 11: ht 0 0 o qoi 0 0 [I' i] 0 0' 0
i 0 4 1 o ~pi a 2 0 al 36 a --13I 1001 0 157
TOTALTUAFFIC7 .3 3 1~ 2 0 o-_ 4;~ 21 _6] CM 19i~9 (F 9'1 3260 {i ~l
T(~ 4 ~i 9 3 1 3t1 '.3 2~!! 311.061 1 1'7`3~ 1,577 0, 3,0515
f1;5,fftir,fnfi
t_ COMPARISONS
10-
PERCENT (ALL) ~
DO •
:
CAD INCIDENTS ~ 6.61 p/o
TRAFFIC STOPS ACCIDENTS +~425%1
.7Zn~
STOLEN VEHICLES i -17.65%VEHICLE RECOVERED I 4023%
BURGLARY I 7.58%1
f-
ROBBERY 2& 92°51 I
THEFT -6.99%' I `
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF -24.65%~
- - VEHICLE PROWLING 5980011
- ~
-O 00 • •P- 00:
CAD INCIDENTS T i 022
TRAFFIC STOPS 13.45%~ !
ACCIDENTS -14.59%
STOLEN VEHICLES i -25.93%' i
VEHICLE RECOVEREO 4 7 -;4°.fo~ I
BURGLARY ~ t2615101 !
ROBBERY i A4.44%1
, -
THEFT 11 83~
,
MAUCIOUS MISCHIEF i -20.85%
VEHICLE PROWLING ' 113 48°u ~
~4; ~
CAO INCIDENTS 5. t 8
TRAFFIC STOPS 6.40°r6 I {
ACCIDENTS I -38.1196
STOLEN VEHICLES i -24.0596' '
VEHICLE RECOVERED -?fi 001%:
BURGLARY ? + I
ROBSERY -50.00% I I,
THEFT MALICIOUS MISCHIEF i 9.87%
VEHICLE PR0INLING j -2.06%1
05/13lOS
~ COMPARISONS
(ALL)
u ~ c. 7t- - - _ . •:_i
01 /07 to 04/07 8529% {
olros co 04/0e ~ 61.90% -
March-07 82.02°r6
March-08 - I 63.29%Apr-07 -701 %
Apr-08 53.33% ~
Mar-08 I 63.2996
Ap~-48 ! 53.33%
r.. ♦
1 IM._I: t
01/01/03 to 12131l03 ~ 84.90%
01 /01104 to 12/31 /D4 ! 86. 31 °,b
01/01/05 to 12/31105 ~ 83.93% i i I
01101/06 to 12J31/06 85.87% I I
01/01107 to 12/31/07 77.94°kA 1% drop equals - 6 vBhiGe5 ~
01/01108 to 04130l48 82.29% , -
- - - ' I ,
05! 13/08
; COMPARISONS
(SPOKANE VALLEY)
• • 007T0JAN APP?00
CAD INCIDENTS 8 3?
TRAFFIC STOPS 7.34%j
ACCIDENTS 3.56°k'
STOLEN VEHICLES ' -12.96%' ~
VEHICLE RECOVERED I -22.22';~
BURGLARY ~ 26 97°,~
ROBBERY 10, G,ri% ~
THEFT - -6.41%MAUCIOUS MISCHIEF -36.69%
VEHICLE PROWLING 67 A8%i i
~
CAD INCIDENTS j 16 78;~
TRAFFIC STQPS 26.14q61
ACCIDENTS -23 20°/u
STOLEN VEHICLES -33.33%VEHICLE RECOVERED ' -33.33%
BURGLARY 63 4 1
R08BERY ~ -33.33°Io, ~
T}-IEFT j 14 81
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF j -26.4096I
VEHICLE PROWLING 147.17%' ~ I
r,FRCF O
I
CAD INCIDEN7S 2.31910
TRAFFIC STOPS I 3.5096 ~
ACCIOENTS I -31.19°!o'
STOLEN VEHICLES 46.03% I i
VEHICLE RECOVERED I42 86% i
BURGLARY _L 36 i_^-:; ~ I
ROBBERY I -42.86% ~
THEFT ' 12
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 33.33'% I I
VEHICI.E PROWLING 14_91% I ~
p5/13/U8
. , COMPARISONS
(SPOKANE VALLEY)
.✓'i;
« . . ~
•
01/07 t0 04/07 65.28%
01/08 to 04l08 i 58.3396!
March-07 ~ 65.38%
March-08 55.56%
April-07 58.82%
April-08 ; 58.8296
Mar-08 55.56%'
Apr-08 i 58.82% 1
, _A ,
- .
.
01101/03 to 12131103 _L _84_90°ro
01101I04 to 12131104 86_31%
01/01105 to 12131/05 83.93%
01 101106 to 12131/06 85.8796
01I01J07 to 12/31/07 77.9496 A 196 draP equals - 6 vehicles I
01/01108 to 04/30/08 r 82.29%; ! I
- . i
. ~ .i -
17,
0110110410 12131104 i 87.43% _ i_ i~- - - -
01/01/05 to 12131/05 I 8326% i
01/01/06 to 12131/08 ~ 87.50°,6
01/01107 to 12131107 7822%:
01/01 /08 to 44130108 822296
05/13/08
~L
~-7~ ~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: 5/20/08 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check al) that apply: ❑ consent ❑ o►d business [D new business ❑ public hearing
❑ informatlon ❑ admin. report ❑ pend(ng {eglsiation
AGENDA ITEM TiTLE: Motion Consideration: Pool Construction Timetable and
Contingency Funding
GOVERNING LEGlSLATION: Nane
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTiON TAKEN: Counal has awarded the bid for pool renovation
projecls which have commenced construction.
BACKGROUND: Staff, after discussions with our pool consultant and contractor, has
determined that the pool renovation project will not be completed until 2409. It is anticipated
that 70°k of the total renovation project will be completed by December 31, 2008 with the
remaining 30% to be comp}eted in 2009. Prior to the bJd opening, the original paol renovation
project budget included a contingency provisfon of $200,000 in 2008. When the bids came in
high, the $200,000 contingency was reduced to $10,000 so that we could real(ocate the
difference ($190,000) fo cover construction costs. This approach enabled award of the bid and
the initiation of construction activity.
As excavation proceeds at poo) sites a variety of change orders have been proposed to deal
with discovered items and suggested improvements. Hence, we are in need of making a larger
contingency allocation to carry the projects through to completion. We recommend allocating
$190,000 for this purpose. The money would come from the Parics Capital (mprovements
account which is funded each year by Real Estate Excise Tax atlocations-$400,000 to
$500,000 annually. Drawing $190,000 fn Real Estate Excise Tax revenues will have the effect
of moving other projects tentatively planned for 2009 or 2010 into later years, depending on
funding availability_
OPTIONS: 1. Give the matter further thoughG 2. Reallocate $190,000 for pool renovation
project contingencies. 3. Reduce project scope to offset the cost of change orders.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOT10N: Move to authorize the City Manager, or designee, to
reallocate $190,000 of Parks Capital Improvement dollars to provide contingency funding for the
2008-2009 pool renovations projects.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Reallocation af identified funding.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Stone
ATTACHMENTS None