2008, 05-06 Study Session
AC EN DA
CITY Or SPUKANE VALLCY
Ci7YCUUNC'LL WUE2}iStiESE:T
STl1pY SESS10N
7ursda}. May 6, 2008 6:00 p.m.
CTTti' HALL CUI,rNCIL CHAAiBERS
11707 East Sprngnc Avenue, Pirst Floor
(Plcasc C;icncc Yuur Ccll Phone.g During the M1leeting)
DISCUSSION I.EA.DER SLtBJTCTlACRNrIT1' GOAI.
i. Kcn Mewitinney, ChriS Venne Affordnb(e Mousing Pre sentatinnlDisrussirn
120 niiuut4s)
Stcvc kVorlc} 120 minute;l !'rop,r,rd 20097'rFmtipart:Itinn Improvcrncnt Plan
3. Grc¢ %MtCurniiil.. (1~iiiinutrs) C'emintinity DeN-clopmcnt Block GranU'Iiume Dixussiun/lnformation
Coiisortium Pnrticipation
-1. Grrg McCormick Comprchcn.5ivc Plan Schedulc DiscussiorL`luformation
(20 minutm)
S. (?are Memier (5 minutes) WFDEA Tax f:xempt Ecanomic Develapment Disctission/lnformation
B-nnd, e30 million, WastrMnnaLement, lnc.
ti Dare .Mrrcicr (60 minutrs) Cuunril's Six-1'r.ar 'franti[k)rEation Financia) !)is,:us4iarl'(nform~ti~~n
( ionls
7. Ma% or Munson Advancc elgenda lliseu,ssiun/Infomintion
3 l,rformarion (htly: 6ri!lnot hc discirssed nr repnrted)'
,W Bdrker Rwd 11'ri;tge Ihd .4«'nn! hl 24''6Ati•enue l3ril:ltircn-c!
U. Mnvor Munum Council Chr-c,k in Di,~Z itstiion/Infortnatir,n
lU. Dnvc Mcrcier Citv M:ina^cr C'ornmcnts L)iscussicin'[nforniation
ADJOURN
Aurc: U9IlYi QtIICPViSt 11(IItQ AbOvt, tAcre wiU be no pablk eomments ot Comcil5tudy Sessiaas. Howvrr, Counci) dways rotrsa tAe
righl to requnt infnrmaUon fcuta tAe public Rn4 stuR aii ariirvpr(sle. I)uring mrcttug,s heW by the City of Spokme Vslle7 Cixmcil. the CouncJl
rcauncs Wc right to L-Lhr `ecdon' on any item Ifslcd ot w:MCyuently aeldai tu tho bgaxla. The trrm "rctFan" moeat to dct3beratc, dFse:ue% ceriew,
c,cmiQer, cvaluaue, ormako a tulledive paaiti~c or negptlvc detixiLm
S.onr. F InA:vkluals Pfwwirl tn utrnd Uk mcctJrg whn reywae i{rocial taistanct- w accsnjn%odatc phyiirn1. hentmp vr rrhet impai7nsi!ls. idzr r-e!Xf: tlr_ City
1:1n4~:l±:•+~o'~.{~i•:m~:ninnt;~r.::l't:.~th:,turci~:itr.:iLr..ar: ,a~1r
21?: 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: PJlay 6, 2008 City► Manager Sign-off.
Item: Check aU that apply: ❑ consent El old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ~ admin, report Ej pending legisfation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Affordable Housing
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Discussion leaders include:
Chris Venne, Development Finance Manager of Housing Services, Community Frameworks,
and past Chair of the Spokane Neighborhood Economic Dzvelopment Alliancz (SNEDA) Board
Ken Mewhinney, member of Spokane Affordable Homeownership Task Force; Chair Spokane
Association of Realtors Govemmental Affairs Committes
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS:
December 7, 2007 Spokane Housing Workshop Report
Excerpts from "The Right Size Home, Housing Innovation in Washington"
Spokane Municipal Code, Chapter 17C.110.350 Cottage Housing
.
~ . . . .
Michael Luis & Associates
~ Spokane Housing Workshop
December 7, 2007
A. Overview
The Spokane Housinb Task Force was convened 'ui early 2007 out of a groAing concern with
a sudden increase in housing prices in the area, following a lone period of sustained
affordability. Reasonable housing costs bad long been an important feature of the high
quality of life in Spokane, and it was easy to sce the negative impacts of high prices by
loaking across the mountains to the increasingly unaffordable markets of the Puget Sound
area.
Q Indeed, forces ttiat had been reducing affordability in the Yuget Sound area were moving out
across the state; leading to major price increases in rural and small toNvn Westem Washingion
and across the passes to 1Cittitas and Chelan counties. `Vhat was once a problein faced b},
King County had become a problem for communities housing the majoriry of Washuigton's
- residents. Across the state, public policy is collid'uig "ith market.and demoeraphic forces, and the
casualty is hausing affordabiliry. 'Ihc Growth Managemeni Act, and its local impleinentation,
lias not been able to come to grips with some fundamental econamic and social forccs:
Disparities in income growth. VJhile the question of income disparities nationally engenders
spirited debate, thereis no question that the Puget Sound area, and King Couuty in particular,
has seen a rapid growth i.n high wage technoloey-based jobs. 'T'hese jobs are oflen ta}cen by
people moving to the state wbo have the earning power; and often the equity, to pay h.igh
prices to live in desirable neighborboods. F'ressure on prices in the Seattle-Redmond axis
pushes demand for moderately priced housing to neighboring counties, Nuith a ripple effect to
the counties beyond that. 'rhus, poor housing affordabilit), in ICing Counry generates demand in I,ewis, Kitkitas and Skagit Counties.
Continued preference for detached housing. Local unplementation of the GMA has, as an
underlying assumption, that Waslungton residents vvill gradually shift from detachcd housing
into attached housing in urban centers. Thus, ample capacity for urban c.enter multifam.ily
; -
~ housing is considered adequate to meet housing demand. $ut there has been no shift awa},
- from detached housing in the past 15 years, and a constricted base of land zoned for detached
housing has pushed land prices up dramatically.
P.O. Box 15 ° D4edina, A-VA 98039 2 425-453-5123 1 mluis@sealZet.com .
Uncoupling of jobs and housing markets. As growth pressures push outward from King
County; and as retirces and tclecommuters find rural and small toAm living increasingly
. attractive, many smaller communities are e_xperiencing a erowing demand for housing from
people whose aznple livelilioods come from outside the locdl er.onnmy. These high-earning
transplants push up the cost of local housing beyond ~~,hat individuals relying on the local job
hase can afford.
These forc;es have begun to reach across the open spaccs of Central Washina on to reach the
Spokane arza. But as startling as the rcccnt price changes have been, Spokane is still in much
better shape than the Puget Sound are.a and most of Western Washinaton. Individuals and
familics of modest means who could not clream of home ow-nership in tlie Puget Sound area
can still afford a home in Spokane. 7'lus does not mean that Spokane vvill escapc the trends of
the state, but it does mean that it has a bit more time to counteract them before they arrive
,A7th a vengeance.
Spokane leaders can leara froin the lessons of Puget Sound and take actions that will help
cnsure that future residents of the Spokane area have ample housing choices at reasonable
Prices. T'he Task Force has explored inany of tllese actions over dlc past year; and can now
begin to refine the details and decide on an implementation plan.
B. Key findings of the Task Force
The economic; market and demoizraphic analysES of the Spokane area sugeest that while
Spokane remains affordable compared to other areas of the state, the same forces that havc
driven affordability down elsexfiere will arrive in Spokane before long. Following are some
more detailed find'uigs from the Task Force's research.
Economic:
Spokane has a solid ecanomy; but wages have been relatively flat for a long timE. Thcre
is not much on the horizon to indicate that that will change.
Spokane has a large and stable middle incomc group, but, as compared to the state as a
whole; fewer high income households and more low income households.
Sectors such as technology and healthcare that pay reasonaUly Nvell are tending to grow,
while less welJ-paying sectors such as retail are not nrowing as fast.
In spite of steady gro\vth, $pokane will not in the foreseeable future become a"supcrstar"
city that attrar.ts lots of very high-wage jobs.
With steady; but unremarkable growth, and slow overall wage grow-th, die Spokanc
ec,flnomy calmot a.bsorb ra.pidly iucreasui[z home prices.
Demohraphics:
In-migration is the kEy to understanding population growth and change in Spokanc.
Niichael Luis &Associates Page 2
There are two distinct kinds of migrants to the Spokane area, each urith their own housing
. needs: .
Migrants from rural areas of the state and Northern Idaho, who tend 1o be youn;,
unmarried, less well-educated and with less earning power.
Migrants from the "coast;" California and other out-of-state population centers. These
aze even less likely to be marriecl than in-state mi?rants. Importantly, migrants from
out of state are more likely to have colleae degrees than migrants from in state or even
current residents.
Although cnigrants from out-of-staie have lower incomes now because they are young,
they liave hiciher earnuig power over time than current residents.
The structure of households is shifting. The number of households with children is
falluia, and now constitutes lcss than ane-fourih of households. T'he biggest bulge is in
single-person households.
The population is aging, «ith children constituting a smaller percentage of the population
and empty-nesters in their 50s and 60s groAring as a slice of the population.
Market expectations
Residents tiave noticed that home prices have been rising, but this has not become a major
crisis. People vvith modcst but reliable incomes can still expect to purc•hase a hnme.
'rice constraived buyers ~vill tcnd to opt for older homes in their choice of neighborhood.
oi 1
Many peoplc do not pcrceive that Spokanc is a highly "wban" place, but more of a"big
small tovm." Very dense urban housing solutions may seem inappropriate.
Traff`ic and transportation are not big factors in homebuying. .
There appears to be a market for "lifestyle" buyers 'wllo wo'Lild choose a compact form oT
ground-related development. Tlie new downtown condominium market is not necessarily
serving all of this lifestyle market.
The SPo1:ane area lscks good examples of innovativc housing alternatives and there is lOw
awazeness of altcrnatives to traditional housing types.
Palitical
Housing affordability is not a big political issue vet. Local governme.nts have not been
i'ocusuig on major policy chaalges that would 'uiczease the supply of moderately Priced
housin j. ' .
Advocates for housing policy changes may get some traction tall:ing about "what kind of
community are we-now and what do Nve want to become?" Focus group participants did not seem to have big objections to higher density housing
types in terms nf neighborhood fit.
Michael Ltiis & Associates Page 3
C. Where to go from here
The Task Force has gained a solid understanding of the challengcs facing Spokane as it looks '
to meet future housing needs. Recently-released population projections fTOm the state Offiae
of Financial Management (OFA4) show a"medium" projection of about 125,000 more people
living in Spokane County by 2025. 1"his is the equivalent of the population of Bellewe and a
couple of its adjacent to%Ams. The "high°' projection shows the equivalEnt of another Spokane
living in the count}, by 2025.
It is clear that accommodating another 6;000 to 12,000 people per year casunot be done
thxough business as usual. For the Spokane area to accommodate diat many pEOple while
maintain.i_ng the quality of life aaid affordability that make it so attractive will requue a new
way of looking at housuig mazkets.
Many of thesc potcntial changes were e?.plored by the Task Force, and three things are worth
noting:
Spokane needs it own solutions. The Task Force saw a lot of pictures of housuig
dcvelopments from the 1'uget Sound region, but these cannot simply be unportcd to Spokane. .
The ideas need to be adapted to the unique characteristics of thc Spokane market.
The process will be slow. The housing stock of Spokane expands at only about one to two
percent per year, and innovative housing NNRll be only a small percentage of that, at least at
first. For the foreseeable future, the vast majorit}, of the Spokane housing stock, both new and
resalE; will consist of traditional products. ~
Close cooperation is needed between the public and private sectors. Homcbuilders and
local govcrnments havE traditionally mainlained arms-lenp-th relationships: cities and counties
c.reate a regulatory environment and builders operate within that environment. That will not
work anymore. 'What is needed is thc sort of cooperation that aovenuiients frequcntly engaje
i.n with commercial developvrs in pursuit of economic development objectives.
VJith the recent slowing in the housing mazket; Spokane leaders have the Qpportunity to ;et
started on a long process that xN711 provide attractive housing choices while help keep the area
affordable. By starting now, Spokane can prevent the sort of housing price erisis that has
grippEd thc Puget Sound area for many years.
Next steps
In 2005, the Task rorce c,an eapand on its Nvork along four tracks:
. Supply side. Launch a demonstration program in one or n2ore jurisdictions in $pokane
Cnunty that wil.l result in new, innovative market rate housing dcvelopments that can serve as
models for future housulb. There is a lack of good eaamples of uinovative housing in inarkets
like Spokane, and these models will help local conununities better understand how to craft
; .
pernlaiient regulations to encouragc innovative development.
MichaclLuis S: Associates Page 4
A good model for a demonstration program can be found in the City of Kirkland. This
~ program resulted in two excellent projects that were well received in the community.
Cl) I:irkland will soon adopt ordinances to- allow cottajes, dupleaes and triplexes in single family
zones throughout the city. A similar process in the Sppkane area could test botti the market
and community.acceptance of housing alternadves selected by the sponsoring jurisdiction. .
Demand side. EYpand on the findings of the focus groups to explore in more depth the
emerging market demands that Spolcane can expect Mthin the 125;000 peoplc tllat 'AiU be
arriving in the next 20 years. The focus a oups rese.arcbed mostly first-time and ]ower-
income buyers, but much more information is needed on oiher mar}:et segments.
'The focus Qroups tested the appeal of housing alte•rnatives for thosE with affordabilit},
constraints. Of particulaz interest nex-t will be the market segments looking for alternatives
for lifestyle reasons. 1'his would iuclude sin;les and couplcs without children, empty-nesters
and retirees.
Regulatory issucs. There are many planning and regulatory hurdles that stand in the way of
housing innovation and making the most effic.ient use of available land. These issues can be
divided into two categories:
7oninp, and permitting. L7etermine the bcst mcchanism to allow iruiovative housing tvpes
to be built as aiternatives to existing zoning. Fxplore the concept of "perfonnance
zoning" that seeks to regulate actual impacts, rather lhan just unit count.s and building
envelopes. • Practical issues. 1.nnovauve housing challenges some basic Patterns of development and
will require chaziges in standards for roads; utilities, fire access, setbacl:s, parking; etc.
Cummunication. The Task Force lias enjoyed the cooperation aud participation of a cross
' section of the conununih'• The coinmunieations challcuge now is to expand to the broader
layers of golitical and ci,,ric leadership in the region. To begin, thc Task Force findings and
thE results oCadditional research should be presented ta cit}, couneils, plaauung commissions
asid civic groups to start the dialog about "who wants to live here, and why?"
Thesc four tracks can work concurrently and wiih each other. Demonsiration projects provide
a context to undertake demaud-side research and to explore ren latory alternatives. The
conununicatioti program provides feedback to the demonstration and regulatory efforts.
Conclusion
Spokane has been noticed. According to the Washington State Deparhne.nt of Licensing;
which tracks the trade-in of drivers licenscs from other states, 10,000 drivers moved to
Spokane Courity from outsidc Waslungton from f1pri12006 to April 2007. Only 1,400 of
these people were from ldaho, and at least five people came from every state in the Union.
.
The area keeps getting ,v7itten up as an affordable, attractive place to live, retirc or recreate.
Spokane has all the attributes that arE driving growth in sinular cities around the country:
affordability; healthcare, rECreation, universities.
Nfichael Luis S Associates page 5
With a solid, if not daT„zling economy and an atfiractive quality of life; the Spflkane area Ari11
continue to a ow auid change. The Task T'orce has made a start in understancling the '
ctlallenges of accommodating the housing needs of a growing population in a land base that
will remain restricted. By continuing its work, the Task Force can help Spokane avoid the
affordability problems that havc made the Puget Sound region inacc.essible to maziy people.
-
• ~
vlichaEl Luis S Associates Page 6
Excerpts from:
The Right Size Home
Housing Innovation in Washington
Wclcon;c tc) Ilic Right 5ize Horme.
Thc purposc ofthis caWog is to shiilti eXSI11piC5 Of innoN :ici, c~13~ ; iLI :il«T 3~' f1C:uC ii1
ovr stale. The projuts demansuatc how• housing ittnovation c,an Eie a v►•in-win-win: buycrs and :en:_r~
have tnore choicxs, comtnuni[ies gei ncw housing that fts wcll into esisting ncighborhoods and wc
succeed in goals under the Growth Management Act (G'viA The projecu were selcrtad to furthcr aII
ttire_ of those objecvves:
More cboices: the sight size tor the ctistomer_ A largc, gruwing, and undenmed mari:et exisv ,-•,r
housing rypcs that lic betx=cen n•pical low-dcusity subdivisions and high densiry multi-family
complexes. Exarnples sho,.ti- 3 net density (ezcluding mads. par3cs, etcl ot mn{tly E-wenwecn I2 and ?JJ
uniis per arr:.
Community fit: the tight size for the acig6burhoc►d. T'-,c rmpt.::;. i: on hovsinL r, p.> Jian ran
R'0(k- VveU in infill 3itrs. AlthouO some of the c.Kamplcs are part oi largcr subdivisions or masttr
pla.-ned corntnur.itie:, zl) Lan he sdarted to fit (in :1ie small nar-cels tnat hold ;o much F+otz ntial for
:iew housine.
Coas'tstentvrith GNL4: the right size for the future. in or&; tO ~re>tin c r;-l: ::niJ r:sOI:rL 3rcLis
andma};c thtmastcffecti~~~ ~ItiC •j i,r.~-cLl~:ll-.. C-;1~~ ?Di IfT Ll: l_it~r~. :1_:'~':~ 1:~~ l~il~ :il C:l:
most efl-icient w2), po3sihle.
'.Naritetable: the tigbt s¢e for homebusider-s ^:.:ar':ti a11 oI ihr Pr).j.;t, in tI): :~~It"'L! ,Lr_ -nark~:t-
ratt, SbOwinE 6ovr• builders C8n inno-t•atc wF.i1c me:tin_~ h0u,ine aa 3 ih,
tmancial requirrments of cheir businesszs.
A further eritcrion for sela:ting projccts is the iinancial sUccCss uf ulr devclopmtnL li mc.~ne} n~-,
objec4 a deveiopzr can bc highly innovative. Thcse pro}rrts shoR how buildcrs can innovate «hil:
ti}ecting the housing needs of their custpmers and the finnncial requirements of their busincsscs.
lr.novativc hausing is often very sitc-spccific, responding to Lhc parcel itsclf, its ncighbochood an,±
marl:et, so these models may noc lx cxacdy replicable in man5- settings. We hopc, }lOR'Zti•er, that Ch=,-
sen•e as sn inspiration for imaginative buildcrs and !x-al aovtmmen?s wno can adapt the underlvi~l
J ~ -
princ iplesto ftnd the ri~h~ .:)ei; ..:rf:_: 3•1
A few things to noie
tiVhat constitntes innovacioo"
IIFnOY3UoA dOtS TtOt RCCCSSSTIIy ;ugLiil joClof :ile1i i:t_+t ii IHd1c8l oi U:lUtil:a:. 1 i7: L':~3i i1C( 1t, Pi o'. 1.]:
"advtnturous" housiag: the vast majority of people are very conservative when ttw}• im est in homcs or
income pmpetics. Rather, the innovation comcs from cfficirnt and creative use of spaces, feanucs anli,
amenities, both within the ovrraU detiefapmcnt snd the individuaS homes. Innovative housing seeks thL
risaht siz.c far cach markct w-gment, offerina just the thmRs it naeds. The result is housing that costs Ic~,
uses less land, has lower impacts on the znvironment, and oftrn providcs opportuniUcs for social
i nteractian.
For the compiete catalog, please ses www.rightatzehome.org. For more information, call 425-453-5123
or email luisassociates @comcasLnst
rhese modcLs are fur targcte4i markets
Ihest etamples show choices. Thz dominant huusin2 r.~odcls ot tk.~da,. - la.r-::-lo; -~ir,illc tainil} and i_-,C
multifamiiv campicxcs - will cantinur to bc the most camman housins, tygcs availablc: [hcv arc thc
size for many- households. But both market research and experience shaws that a laree numl~er of
individuals and families are lookinQ for something different, and Lhe`• havz few choiczs :n t, ,•:9a.,
So v%+ilc diese models are not ha-. _afl f;;'.~r1tj ~3..er ntn _r- an.i
"Chc challenge ot aPfordabilin-
~
'The missian oi ~T~e }•lousing Paru~~r>t~,;~ i~ :1;~i~nrJat~~iic}. ~n 6 1 tf ah:~nL C I.- c 11t i,::
incrcases in public subsidics, howcvrr, afI'ordabiliry will cdntinue to lx an outr.ome of the intcracti,.,n . t
-upply and demand. Simply puL if Kc are lo ketp housing prices in Washingwn State from continuing c-
rise at doublc-dicit rates, a•e need a substantial increasc in supply at all levels ef the mar]:et. .4nd with
limitatior.s on land availability -due to Eoth wbsn groc uth line: and infra;wcture csracitv -:hr or.ly
tu get that supply incrcasc is through more efficient ust of the land that is devclopa:.lc
Few of the projects showm herc would Eic cansidczrd "aft'c,rdabie" b}• standard measu: t3::1 :o r. i. ,jiin
inctsme;. 1'hey are all, huwever, mort affordahle than the luvver dznsity altematives thst cauld haN 0 h~en
built in their placr. And bv convibuting more to the overall !,;tiu;ine ;uPrll' r~r 11)~N .icrc,;:N
altematives, they do mo-e to t--ke DrZssurc c~ff tljc narExt.
Tbe need for qualii-,
When these housing ~;L :1110,~,:.] in
and feel af the neiehborhood. An impc+rtant Ka}' LO CiliUaBLC T}12 I[1'1pi3CU Of SUCh GhtiflLZ 15 tll eI1S= j.ha(
the projects have high quality in dcsiim, consuvction, mau.riaLs snd Iand-&caping_ Thc rxamplcs sh~%vn
havt bezn sel:ctcd hec3use theti illu:vrat: dh: ;arr Lhs! and dcvcloners sh -r-iId t3}:e ;~hen ;inrkr~«
in infiU settinc>.
Qnality vs. yuantitN os" Figure 1
spacc
c)ne ef the trade-offs in the
residentinl reai estate +D"all."'•
uf
business i5 the quality of spece
Lwury Ciny rr.~imicm-
space ve.nus tlie qusntiry of ""o""'° I tnwtow,.a aNo C-0~_
I tpO'LttefYU ~.:nlnl'h e:t~t-•
space. f=igure 1 shuws h0w C=Xldp
many typcs of hausing
rypically fit within this
U4dC-off. T'h1. 5had4d to.\ts rt-_NR U:.
indicatt hnusin- typcs WwW~
wr.o,w -
Jr,crihcd in *.his cat71o_. r.usaorY I ISrrp~eren:n
.mr i:n
&uburGw
Lfi!'si W~k-up Stdnlt6si I~Y IMI ~
awsLnenV ratuD i Maac+~.
'.N107 ~:[~h _rY.; I~G+•v
_ - l'nllr . '.~YYRG11fIQ
~p7¢d SRD aY.eJec L
deLt_i~d
M 1~ ~
~1ii1. _~11.
= N:~u:~~~.• Fa~r, .r;,tir~, _The Riq'tit 5iza Home _ Pax 8
, Small Lot Detached Homes ,
Poulsbo Place Cottages - 2001
Deve{oper: Security Properties
Architect: Mithun
Cammunity of 45 catiages in six dusters, located near downtown Poulsbo.
Home Sirrs Cottagm rarrgc from $70 w 1.?65 sf
Dcasin i:rass datsily. includIItg privatt tneds
x, d common grxas. O f appTVx_ 12 ~:uLCJB~'r ~ e
Pa rkin ~ ~losed spacc pc uait. 21 tmits ? •
'_.ive attachd g a r a gcs.'4 hav: g a r a gcs I
. ~
in :n saparate dings i ►ri-stree gues:
~
ACLCiS t'[11tS bCczS~d u'JSi pUNfC C1T ~
s
i rivete raad. Intanal wslkways providc `
~cc~s at cmr side, and ut samr cascs, o:'~ ~
.,,,th sid-es_
L
opcn SRacr t I►units have a prn•att sorrt }-ard and I I 1 f J I' ) ~ ~ I 1 I I I
`ace a comnmoc~ gren cm tttc raar sidt.
Priccs & (7n?L-sC_--s sold S 14 0.000 a71d S I80.0f1i1 in 3vuu. ~LX1.,4 i
Ownership -
cCrSiJG7 LOd ~ 'lli-71?:'1 ii'.'1:. c-nJI, 20'..I I :A.1"•- 1•__ .:._.,_1i 'r--i._~-='7
appnxfation
Nt11'k-tt _r . _-'~'r••-_...li•, _ 111
Entitlemwt The caurs 173 acrt Poutsbo Place dLwdapmag, c►fwl.ic~; tii_ cix.n_~cs ar~ on;: pan. ;va; i,liit :s a r lanned -.riit
&-velapanau m a foamer militsry+'public housing sitc.
Finaacias Com~entianal canstruexion and moAgage fusancing. No rcslTlc:loIli o;1 1+L1y:;1': Cii uii'.l~c ~h:f
Key At3oadabilwy_ Low per-unit land cost, e#f'icier►t sitr 3esign, and scalc combitr_d to makc shc units :claLSN t',,
laam-atioas affordabie. Thr ty}icsl emM-nest buyez rnuld pottntial})• poclct asigaificani amoimt of rasEt by seliinr a
largB h•xne aad moving inso one of the cuttages.
t.arae cottuz communin•. 'ihe prvject shaws hou the elustsx canc,qpt can be cxicridal w a lar¢es devcf opr.,
offaing tbe iaiimacy of a stnaller cltmcr, but the eoooomies of scale af a larger develogmait
Att4chc_d ~nd detached naricing. u4'brre parking en bc cfficientfy pxovidod as aa auachod garagt diractly aii
the svett, that is provided. Units atithout dirat streeF accrss usc rrmoi_ garages Euyers had a choice of ch=.
: omvaiiencc vf an auached gerage. vt bcing away from dst str=t snd hevmg a daac.hed garage.
i=ontextual detaitin- Build iniz desien cictails and colors wsr chos-n ;e fit with thc Scandinsvian heril.3_~ i
PouFsbo Place is located at Jensen Way NE and NE Sunset SL, near downtown Poutsbo.
Please respect the prfvacy ot the residsnts and neighbors
T'he RiQhiSizeHome
ow
1r- . •
~ .
• 1
~ ♦
i
All unhs have
.
walkways on at least
one side. - ,J js
- q~ - - ~ lii ~ n
~
1~ •
.~V J b- r
. . . . . . . _
Clu6ters on common I~
greens range from
.
sive to ten units. I - . t
~ .
.
a.
Many units face
directly onto exisiing
pubiic streets.
i p
r-- _ 1a
Huusifrv Partn?!7,rr~--- The Riaht Siza tiam^ ?y•~:~ T
Site Ptan
Units ol-5:reet wi:l;
detached gar3ges
Units on-streri ~
.
with attached ` i.01 I~
ga-~n:-s
- ' • ~f' L d <
)p7-
WV
Private road
~•1bli~ SL-~: ~:5
T'nARiqht SIZ? Homp ; 1.-
Small Lot Detached Homes
Greenbrier - 2003
Developer: CamWest Development
Architect: Dahlin Group
Davalopmant 0170 detachad homes and cottagas in nor'.n VVoc~dinvill~!
Unit Size Hauses rangc from 1370 sf to 18bn
With thrtt & Foiu bcdrooms, tvvc, ~
Cotsagea range vom 510 sf to SP±i
I7euciti i?ic 70 deinchcd uttiLS of Grcm'.,-
built on aboui suc acrrs. Cor agr~-.
.icnsic}• ot'about 11_5 units~acrr_
sirurarLgcfmm 1910 sfto;61 -5
uti_ hattses. :i-►.i from 1414 sf [o 1
;r
Parkin, :iousts all havc a~ao--wr tanL-
~
:araee. Cattages shx-c a sZtrface
i~,t t_imiud on-sv-..ct guest pari:
-
lccet. i ne prnjcct con*.airts prrv2te ma:i_ -
= nrinect to a }Yublic rvad_
upzn spacc U units have privau yards A ha12-a--r~ pa:l s i:i chc c--nt°r of 1zz clop:~~.,:
Spet lcvct ArTordablt hnusing. Enr.r'gy etficient gas fi,-epiace v►iih tiie sw'totmd. wood t7out ri;~=
s)ial:e-srylt cabineZs
I'rires & AIl housas and cixragrs cm fce simple W. ,All ma,-kd ratt houses sold for S?30.5i+i ,
Owncrsliip
Ete-salcs aod .A nurnber uf univ havr re-sold sun:r uccupird in :002 3nJ 2N3. Av gC 3atIuitl LCI . t
apprcciatioa nbout 16 pcrcnt
NUrket The hcsrues werz tarEeted at fi;st-time buyas and families w-ith mod-erate
Entittement t!nderlymg zoning R-8 (S unfts pa acr_'r_~side:uial). Of the tnW "-scrc c-ounty-owncd aropcrn .`~..i:
the land will re u-ith *.hc ndier i1alf ~-esinrd i7 its natural -13te tci prz;...,- wctisnd _
:nd'.Vnttit SH Irnc,r-, r,*iic- ,:iL3:'t._ i_..:i, ,_1___=
:,,mpetitivc pmw_-z
Finaacin„ Markrtrstc hom~
~ Regicmai Coaliaon for Housing (ARC',
F~.v E;righ deasir,de[a:.ht+dbousinQ_ -Fhe pruir._7 _.~Inn()ti v;ionc ~vorics wall fot fsmilies. Thc houscs arc sm:►11, but,.cn tunrULwnal, unJ proviJc ga.x~ ti-aluc
--ioderaic irrutimc buyers on the Finvidc.
\ erv small lot Siz~.c. 'Mis shaws thn; thcrc is a mxA-et 1or homes an vet-y 3nail loti. 3ccau.u
the ven small lots bad: onto pubiic open spnee, che;' fcel mcro spaitous. 'Ibc par{:, easilv accZ:'__d'.-•
sidevrsiks. prescnts rca-cationa) oppommitics (or childrcn wha nuteraw their snaU bac.k }wd, .
Ai'fardahilin . By starting with couniv-owned land and operat_ing very emcicndy. the drveJopc.- a ,
3:1I[t0 SGLI LhCLIIIIG I_,f fn.•~_r~t- ~r... 1'!,.- I~~c~• l_-~,!
o( impTitvillE: IhCm
Project tocatsd at N. Woodinville Way and 144'" Ave. NE in Woodinvi{le
Please respect the privacy of the resfdents and nefghbors
The Riohi Sizn Nama
4
I Two of Greenbciees
600 sf cottages, seen
from thefr central
courtyard - -
,
~ -
~
_ i►
~
The haff-acre paric is
I easity accessible s;,--'~., .
firom all homes in the
devQiopment i _ , -
CV,
~ 20-#oot streets - ~ - ~ ■ ~ ; ~
provide a more
z=
intimate feei, but do
no allow on-street
parkfng.
_ ~ _ -
.w. _ -
- - - - -l
. 4
!l' 411:J,:f717 f'_I';lllr.!7fi!ji? R3 rit Sf<L H6^7C _ "J:I'_- 2,
Site Pian Greenbricr
! _ I - -
~
~
~ GeeonLrlr NMghtz Sanlor
AP6rbnWNs
00- V
W
~
N U I~• li '1'1 _ _
r
~V +r
`T o . ° ' %
~ 4D
I ~
~y '7 \
I R a~
I ' ' 41
yl
~
Gremdrie. F.in1y
ApaRtnWKs
~
R ~iL ttl.'tli F1
i~
,
.
, u
~
(tE : OEtt~
~ ~ .
1! •t iM tJ i 'f
~
i~
~
II ti ~ I
~
~
~ senlor tww+nv ~ u 1~
!
'
ii: ~•j;- -=.r,-n, ~~li. Thn FYIg',( $!Tn N07f3C _"3je
Small Lot Detached Homes
Kirkland Bungalows - 2005
Developer: CamWest Development
Architect: Mithun
Corrmunity of 15 detacfied homes in Kirkland's North Rose HiU ne:gnbornood.
Hnrne Size 111 Euymts 3re 3pprox. 1500 Squsr-c- t-c!
.-M1 tteve twn bedmams. two-and-nalt
batit, and single cat garagc_ '
llensin ~--ven units'acn grvss dansity, incttsdme ~
~
,mmuniry optn qmce and pubtic c-=-c. -
I.ot sizes:ancr frari :(1 :n 4,?()0
-.~uarc fee2. - 0 ~ ~
Prr{.in2 Cmc-car garagcs :,7 :a,;h hoinc_ at Icasi c 11~ _
-,n_ sp2.^e on cach drveway Espco;t and -
p~sricing cm oae side o f the plat raad , e ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r, ~ `
-rving tbe community-
ac-c5; :b: cmImtmity tnchlde3 apub(ic r-cct
;:at coIIneds in ex;stmg suzst I,: IL~j -s~r••~.
:rids. Fourhoma hati*t gharrd
~i% MavS. "
()ocn S;33tt PfrtC pwk wtas aTe 5tuTimc3cd Dv fau la iL% lloL"ies. ! ac park :i;:.~ :an5, in s,.: c:-. '.~~r;~ ,,~r~►:,
:quare feet Othc apm spaccs inclode aprn space! iandscape' st= water t-arts snd aquaf apprmdma%ell•
f~.500 snd 7.890 square fcet.
`pec {evel Dzericus include samgles, board fibanm, lap siding, frmt parnces, coltmms, lsack-ets. and plnata laj::-
The mscriors inciwie har•lwood, granitr tile bathrwms, and extauive wood milf ~k 071.
i'rica & Fx simpft owrsership. Priced iraQa S430,040 ta 5470,OU(1, befc,re custom upL:-aJ_=
nR-nerxhlp
tiSari:rt With cwo bocfroasas, a smgJe car garagr and smeil private ysrds, thcst 6omes L: ,:primanl% at smLit--:
and ooupks.
t' n ririemeat The caRUmuniry N•as dcvelaped as gart af a law Impart Devdopmcnt Uemonsvation Program spc►nsnred
tne Ciry of Kiridand, and was thersCarc given a 504/e dcnsity bnnw. a itn ht -:1r~mg .-,,F RSN -
".200 tht property wouid aahcrwise trave accmmodatod eigbt ar nine homes.
-innncing <arveavcmal rcxsstrucKioo and marctgage fnweing. No restrictiaas an lxuyer o.' ,1V.'T)!r.•^In
kn, FIi2ba dassirv deviched hoc~sine 'Ibis aammunity sbwws a neigbbarhaod of snallrr mnr_
Inoovation+ :ind commoa apm spate as an nlianntive to larga, more cxpensive homes built in th.- a-ea
,N ffordabilstv. Whu7a nat a8'ordable in an a6solute ssrse, home.s nsr much less expcnsiv_ :han
coasuvctian homes in tt-- area (msd-$700.0UOs). Be,'ausz tfsey include th: txpens'sve gar=s (kitc:hc:v.
L-a!hrooms ) but las of tbe inexpensn e spwe (bedtooms, bcrnvs rootns).per-squate-foot cog is stjme.4 ha-,
hig}ta [hsn dx iargct homa5.
~,rnsz of coirim_unity. Fifcem harnes an gaicty siapinp, arrv:d strcet u-ith imprt&s-ive aTchiteeture. zrnplc
common opan sWt and incressed tenciscaping E+em-~--n
rnottgh critical mass tu creatc a true srnst of coMmur,ic..
C,murnotl4pas Egace. The small indR•idual Id sixs m -LLn Ic<: ,r:_~r._.:.~-,:_ ic,- ~i~_ n_. i;
ccommon areas Mvide recaeation and a srnse af opt:nn--<&
i The Kirfciand Bungalows are {ocated at 132n0 Ave. NE and NE 97`" St in Kirkland
Plsase respect the prtvacy of the residents and neighbors
TjT@ Rigti f 520._NOIT19 r'iTj~- _i
t
1 .
Landscape and
streetscape details
woric to provide a
.1
sense af community
- - - - - _ - ,
' r ,~i.,.~ ~
_ --lkl`~
~
~
r
Four units have
shared drivsways off
the main road. ~IM~
,
~
~
r
Haif of the 40-foot
right of way is used
for sidewaiks and
plantings. . . .
.
r•~.• ;;r~~ ;~~c ~~:i~?r~~r~;hr,_ rhe_r?;qhf Size Home
Small Lot Detached ~
Cherrywood Lane -1998
Developer: Northward Homes
Architect John Lane
Development of 63 detadhed homes on small lots in Renton.
l'nit S¢e Dtiachzd homes range norn 1,490 sf w ~
1,960 sf. ~
Dcnsi[ti 53 unitc on approx_ 10 accs far g;oss
J:asitv of 53 unitsracrc. Lat sizts range
frt7m Wax. 3.100 to 4,100 sf. NC.
iry apQrox. 123 umits'acre
, _
1'arl~in~ t!l uniis heve twu--;,ar garaget rront-
~
iuadr.d houses have pwling on drvc►~•a~ - w '
aa:aas. Gucst parkin~ spaccs aa sur~t. ~
_
.~ccess A I1 hama aw pubfi: suaxs uithia the
Jcvelopment. 23 hnmss heve nI}re•-
a_cess, -Aith tt-- remainder fraw-loadecL
flpen 1~-pacr Ai) homes have pr'cveit side ywd.t
;-rord-lnade+d boma have rear}wz3s. A
:alf-acre pari:, with Fla}• um is in the ~ .-,~.=~t' =
..~ta oi the develonnan - • ~ <~j P1'3tCS aZ to
QN'D CtSibl Q
Re-salIGS i11d N'1cL1~ I')'t~ -V.,-5`= 3T1!]:~di :3~ ^~C: =lln~: -:~t•i - ~•'.*..'1~
ippreciatiOn
1'IlT'k-tt rt;~;i._Ia:l:i'n:..:: . r~,Cl_•-;1~~.,~~~'.i-n,i%_, .
EntitkmEnt The prvjoct wss buiit th.*otteh a demamstruian
Financing Ccmvcntiunal ccYnstrucxian and rnartgaga finactcin_.
Ke` Fwnily-tn-irnEed snall lot hc►usin~ Althuugh the pn.3' L,:;,:; mth'_
Inoo%ations !9jr-ets:apes sre friend}y fcu eh!!-en. Tbe loop road i5 efficiea:, but does not rnccxuage pttas-thral,-:i
a~[ic, mafung the intcioa ai the Froja.-t f=l sefr
Comm►mitv c►flen space Tlhe haJf-a= pwl: is muc3► Iargcr a.-id moTC fi~►e:icmal ifm ihe naical
:hat wuuld be sncluded in e dwelcipTneni oi this siu. 1[s :_n-r-_1 i,,_ a,t .71. :t lc:} s:~
duoctiy on iL or acruss the siroe~ mal►ts it r•ery usrable.
*:mraw Streetf wid tiv.ni-o2-R'AV. 'Iht basi.: strCt Ridth tn :n: .i~ lo Prn~ ~ 'Cl Ic_t. iL; =o~:i_
:•0 foet %ide to atr.cmmpdate on-xtroct park-ing. Total righ,-of•K,a~ is 40 fcct. (A nea.rtn- drvclopmLn'
-xith couventional cut-de-sac design has 5:-fao; right-oi-u-sy. 'out rce-s and no p1W-itme stmp=- i
\3tTOWef StrL.:iSpCUYld2 8II10.'1GIa*1III8ttT1t]S;~i(4r:t.iv :lli. _ .~t ._h~!.~3-- .1:_...;!1_
ssi~xs_ and eacowaging slowa spercLc.
Project located at NE 6~' Street and Dwall Ava. NE, Renton. i
Please respact the prhracy of the residents and neighbors
; n= r,a:fLr~,,1 .D,..-.-r, , rne r~rqrt Srz_ Home
The hatf-acre park in ; -
the center of the
development makes it
a chi{d-friendty -
neighbofiood. " ~ _ _ _
~
25 of the hames have
garages on alieys.
The rest are front- _
loaded.
; .
. ~
The basic street width
Es 20 feet, but cut- i -
aways are provided -for on-street parking.
~ - - _
.
M ► ::L ~ ! , , 7.
-ani~;n.:' ~ 7
Spokane Munidpal Code nr~n~ay, 4011 K, 23G_ - =:D9 PM
Trtle 17C Lnnd Usz Standards
Cfupter 17G110 Residetniai Zones
Sxt3on 17G110.350 Catte9e Housing
A. ia,trpo5e-
The Int?nt 3t cottige hausinq l5 tn 5uppart ;hc diversitV Y hauuna, inQc~ses zhe vanciy Y h•,L;tnq '1',)!s for snall.x ha:r:~r►~b~s ~-iC pr~~l~,-:~ :`Y
u~nn(`inity f:.r &i;al1. deiached single-famnuly 1wJtur3 unirs wit}w,. eydsbng nek}hbomxv±=.
I
f..
~r ' h .,~.~.~.~1 ` .
. . . ~ I
~ , ► .
~
R
s
.~--f-i-~
3"- '1'I =.J!n- -Y 1'Ir`l _ '"ltrll't'lf'1 :l"11'_ T3r:IR7J^ Of •-✓✓°lN° ..lf ~
f5 3{lvW:'j N Ivpc A G'-Tiilr Itl ~TI :.4 3f1d `._rr _~i:i, tiLIJ~C= I:, _`1_ 3f1o pi'!1': -!Iaf1
:~-sign review of t,',e slte ptan arid eaai wildlrrg permrt 3ppkac►on r requirea.
. acit? pHn depKtitg tht buiiding IomUOrts an0 ormntM1on, opci ~ryva:_ .;;,ac:~. f!~nzing, 5e:[,e-1:s.
."---ments and mmpitarXe vrRh sutseclJons (D) and (E) of thls se`'ion is f!iyUi'"td C-~ ::JJmi!Y°,' 1y(:h 1: apofica*.iar, : n•' v-'_
ai:in, if aprxoved, LS rtiquirad to he reeortkd at the Spokan-' c:rljn-r i-jda-nr ; cv:+udi-i; trw 'h :;~~r - N~ ~~.~•t; 'r,a:
_nfDrces the etemenis of thc wttage hoLsing ordinanc--.
A h-i'l~lv~til~!S?~~!'I:i*L:1i~ I: ~~a f~r~~ fr y_ C:'=3faj r~. .~L•. ::Ji~'_^~3it" J~ !'lC Jj.k?~~,,~3_~. ~?'1:l/. ]1,.~ ='lr __.TT1.~~D"I ~~J~~:o~ - ? i=,_,or A- :3
P--``-`~ o1 ~
-bc `.D:~~i vu3 a(•'acf-, :~aL'aj= ir,it ~;`Ia11 nX czzt2J on,-• :Ir_~tt~nJ !,qua-r fi2!~L Ti`.31 Ps_x 3r.a i, ;i--~:i krici.tIy' wtth [h=:
=:.rr~~nd~ng •_>:t:•na: w~lr;. C1j: :xcr1~«,3 any spaoe wnera the `1-rjr to _elling '~2tghL ~i~~~ LLan ~•x f=_t.
~
r ■
"m -
- ~ ~
, -
.
. , :
~ .
~
~ -
h :?r~ ma?:imun rir-~t Iaor ar mam Fiwr atr3 for an indMdual ;Innopal -4rv--tUre stidq be ss tolloh•.]
i i-or 9 kast RRy perr.eM dthe units, the Moar area mey not exceed sx hurxired fi';y xn:i
ti : vr no more than fWty percent of the unlis, the flaor ara rnay ba up tb orte b)ousarxf square fe--t_
n-: toul ;auar-- focitBge d a cntt3;je dwe[iing UnR may not tY inQea+. A ni~.~ s1taL t)e a1arced nrs rhr. M1-2 -•r= pruyr,y ;a-
purp,.,"sZ ot r►otlfying t,turz praper[y owrtiecs *.he, any 6~c~~se Iri 'i:al iA;uar_ `oio:ag° -4 y_at,3g, p-ohit7lLj (ir the O`>
c~.,::3gt or the duranon of tfie dty cnttagt hoetsing r2gutatlor,,.
_ u:--3qe are35 t3sa[ doe not oount tnvrard the tna! iioor area cal:u,ii'to a%.
. unheated stardge Wara bcatad under the mam fbar af -~*~3g_,
1: 3'7-:Ifiectlif3l 3UC': G5 ::13y Wlil'J?W h'?PlJcc'.c U' J~17f;~ ;1G:~ ~1:~ _)r_a~-_'f 1,1,9:1 In
`~~,i Ill NI1dth;
III ;f::3=t1Ed iDlf pD~'"z12s ,ufl°_'?clC~°-, i;
ro_ deiac"sed garages or caryo^~-;
v. spaci-, wrtfi telfing hetight,y t-- th-~ _,•t-ri:)r and
]IT_~oJrc _l= l( Ch'S :°[TI~J'1 t,
. LJt CJV2rd,7=
i_T~1C_t'_-. ~.-~I' ` r ~••.r ~r
ThP Tli:lll'.II`1 (:,r 31
: G:•n3i-Y
The ~Dtc-agc hau&r,y :k._bpfn~,-it Perc_n: 15 tn•_
~ maxunum of tvvelvt unlts tn the deve~cipcn..bnL To rakvL32e p.'r,nttted densfty, iJNkdP ttr_ bt area by the minimum iot sue a~`~_
t!?, 3~1j ?hen rn-iM,iIply t`i.=r num7?r by'~'lnrl"V rpn.•.nnr jha tia-rs1?ID- bt sLz° I?clJfT?RYii i 3f ';Mc 1'(~ 1'. n ~~IXC) J1 n0? 3'J7N fa'
,~.i~1«J_= =~~~-1L=t~rr~ ri ~n.~._ .i~ut- ~r:..,J r~ ~ ~-r_:_.~,,,~ d=:=i»-=r•
'l.anc- Municipsl t= ol: I'a=e °t 7
+
k
~
~
ne,qnr
~l'2 heigfl: fo( 3ll SuJCtILRCS il.); t'xz:oE~'d Zgfl:Ce:l C:1i.3?2 J- 3(Y~I~y ;iUlY~l'T^yi ~ ::Vll~ ;ll~'l?= :.Jf~ Wn'. ;7 n, If71-S'J7
-r„7!y ectend up tn twenw-flve'ee[ ai the rRdW of the raof.
i-Z-:.125.
2 Z3tiage hau" unlcs shaN bc oriented sround and have tfie cavered porCes of main errby hom the tomman aqen space :.xreept,
cDCages adjaaent to a pub6c stree! shnll oncrK the trorR of tht rnttage *.o tt►e sV--i including plaK3trtwnt d Me parrh. Tnis
provmon dDes not pre-Jude the usz at acSdiU'anal poc-ches or archrtr--trai feacur-- of tte cottaga. fmn being orkn2ed to !:he
common apen sRace-
:,D:rage har.sinq unhG s'uU havz .3 covered Po,-::h or en:ry at IeaF.' sr<Ly sjuar2 `ce nsumn wkh a miumum dirn?rsian of sac tAet an
3ny ~i0c.
,
~
-Ak,^
a. T7e mrsnrn open spw~ mwR 5e a: kawLst two hurtidred ftfty squerr fee4 pes cotta-ge houst~g uriL Opel vvr- ;2~im~r„~~
Hs tlw [weJity tee2 shail not be U+duded In the cakutated oomman open space.
b_ Ench [flttage housng unt s►ed be pmvklett wRh a prwaFe use open ~ d twa hluid2d f1Ry SQuate feei wri; no d~rr_~ E;tan 5r
I-~ than ten feet on one side. tt shoufd be tontigueus b each cotta9e, t•3r -v ex:lusive use dtr ontiaW resideen! snd orient!~-d
toarard the mmmon open spat.-~.
c. I(7? 0(71CT1on bxil S{73Cc t, r~auir~~ ta ot° Drix to occJ; a'a:'>' of any 5' ;he, .•.~_rt~r~ and S311 T~?II'iu{n°:! !+y a
7.
a'll n:)in;aw fl~, .i:1f: L-~T . U' =_Y.d'iilnii wiFhlr-, !tr°_
:~t►p:, ~ «ti«~.s~k.:n~::it} sen i:%~S docum:nL,~ SHIc; F-linL'd~:auit.aspx
_,l 1 ,.J_
i Eaves may .:p i_ nwe!vtl
wificxappurtenancssvcls as P1Aes, g3~r .~~i~ cl_-rTi_~ i)-.i~~:, Slu":~ =)•::y~io, d~; v~:l:, d't:l i1-•'.v-t~F~C~ ~f-
h. Sa?.iaClts for all st-uctures from ttre property Itnes sEiag be an average of Ln feet., but shal: no' t)=
,han fitteen ite fram a iyjbic streeL s+milar ta the frant yard setbadc requirerl a( a si.3n~-~-' -i1~1o!'
Zil! :'1311 f)?."ln aG =M741 I-ii
;i _ ic :7~ ~LiiJ,a^:.. . ~.f~ `Ci f'~ _'I~ _~I".1-„ }_'r- 1 'I~~ j'_' ,-i: . r i= . i.~ ' •i.~ ~i: ~-I.~
ii'
~ a I ,
I fl? (•?ziWfi~-j fill'll.-'PJ-I nltfTl:,eC >f ;.:df7.1f13 fJ; c3: 1;✓iu~3, s>>ng uni-, 5:~J11 iy_ O":'JI:Ii'•~
chaPW 17GZ30 SK. PaNcJrxg and LaadYng.
D. P3rIUng shall tY dusLred ard sapaatcd from trie tomrnon araa by tandsapirrg and/or arrhitem-aai scen. Sobd board
shaU not be albwr+d as an ardhftecural sTe?n.
~zla-kireg shall be screened irom Pubfic strr►..s arxi adjaL--n: res+dintial tx-~--- t-y l3nd--4--:air
fendng shall not be agawed as an arrhftecWral srreen.
d. Parkfng shall be sEt back d minimum af twCnty te8t trom a pct5ik 7e~L
Paricing shall tr_ loca:d In ds5ters at not nv3re than fr.~- :='-w;:
! J1 JItCh?] 1=- 1ari ..,jI': i in--]
i~e:t--s;r.an C,onnecn+,-,
4Y aUQdlr►g5 8nd CD'ur _ . =.j,:v. • 1'fl ' ~J 'r' _ = f, . _lr-..~~:1 , _ , cy i'i . -'Pt• q ili ,I:rIc31- -,-j'~',
~.J~~I~I: _•r;jl _~.i~~~fC~
~ip prew!n: L}le t?]t{K.1V2 L:.S= a( ~Y tzT'IL L:arlbl .v:YJ:I Of t1JIdlil•g f?,r3TJfLn dil;: ~.31i)i7 WI!filll a
"le1p praride pmpatibiifty Y thp cottage housing dedzl,-Vment wl:.fi Cxw _-ttaratier at !.,'►e su-rDun:Jing neighborhDod 5uilding and -;4t_ devgn snAi
n~l'~'IQ2 vyfl°?~' 311J dltili7~ I'T; ~.'1~• f~p0~;1'Ij C~- =~L'1'__ tC ~7°_ ?.'~'JI~C'~ J:i:. _.-Jt'i?7r2 Fr~!!711:~ ;f;~"J?~~R!T7r'r~":
;ii'(-' 1i,~\t~,:;~~'1.~!_l..il, i I"_' ,_I~"~;.'~~~i~ ~'-~'I- • . --~-`1-` .
S},okwne \turicipzl ( odL 1 ~I -I~= : -
: ~
•I~ - .s
" V • ~
~ /~a~~`~l ■ ■
f ~V sVil~ 3 ~ • T~ J.~ ~S ~,a - ~ ~
- ' - - ~
► :'..5~, -
..,,_.b.
~
? . Yanety m 3uUding Deqgn.
Tr_ sa;ne cQmbiriaGan ot bru6drng e;erK,)±x, fe3fu2s 3.-~ Uea[mcr+`,s shall not be `or more ttan fwency ps:en: ot 7ie mtsl
dweltfrxg unRs in 3 cottnge Aousang dev-_hprenL Dwelings wRfi :3ie same combination of t~~ra and :rtatrnents shan rwt be bc3L~j
4acerrt to each oUer. Fa exampfe, aadh dwdilnq In a stx unit cattacx housing devrbpient coufd Include a padl Drovided bulidbg
e v;i
~lements such as ~ dttaits d t'e porct~, roof ~ape or cdar, b~hg cdor or maizrials, or hulidh g a~ were va~ied t~ xtkv ~
nrr--;L A minlmum of lout ot i:w_w talbvving b.tNdlng emmeq-,~, f-=31-1 ires , 3nd trea'n-,rfi`s'3-.st prvviJ*- vanW.y an3 v5iral shaii tot
P~--.rvnOEd:
a. hMltloc►al po*_tras and paJns l.ryJUired pcx,:h naZ rduded;.
n •,-,in4 rovf Owams ar gables bAwcn adjacrnt structi,rec-
_ Windovr5 wi[h Wsible trtm end muiiiozs.
d. Ftaof bracceM
a- Dom►er~
rast18 boar
3ay mndm-,
r.. Lntry enh3nc._>rnin: air-h 3• n wrll riYCall-ei d--or frnuiti-pane4 or g4=5; Iasc-rt1, wlidmv 3d}3r-en; tn frmt daor, a rv3f ~[~~:v,n
I T2AlS
1. P'~ad~t~i0:1.
k. Chimney 1,44wn on Che extcrior at the houf--'.
f. Variation in roof or bupoing rn{or and rstaar,sls, suc^ :s bn~c, stone er a:h-.r -n3:onry a~;
rn. b'anatlon In hotshg iYpe dtid
I Orner buUchrrg eiern.enr, triahrun`s, featsi*es, or s"- deig^s approved by t're cAe -+jrrsinistratoir Gria: p:ov►jp- varvo~ya,-r:J 05LAi
Int?'est
!iili:l''L1'~I?:•4 ~ilIiL'~~{:1'.!1~..~~~\ i{~ '~1~)~
10~~S ii~o,:
,
L-
t
( -
, i ~ 4.
Ak
- -
~
- ~ _ y ;
;
~
f
t -
• I ,
~
~~+~w • I t ~•I ( .
!II:~i: t~'.\l~. •I~~~~•.;iil~'~1(~. ~i_ , ,ti~Cl~'11.~::~ :r~~. "~ri:._'•.~:.nCl~ ~ : =ii'`~Itkl'
r 'i
STc>k-m,. Mutl;cip3i L~A. I
:~z- . . .
. ~
Up ♦ ~ ' t ' Y
p v _
~ ~ I - ! ~l ~ 1• - " _ ~
~
~in.•• ~Iljll ~ - .,"r ~c- _ ~-i.
Z4• . " ' ~ M
3
~
Modula;ion and articutaflon G ach .w? tt:nugh a twnbmaUxn ot charrges G7 plan ard Ta~.>r~ls Oeai4r)3. i-txy r,.tr►ction tD add viwal I-F:-erflt
Mmvph stiadows, htxmn sciiie deoiiing and textures rarA+ng the apparent nass and sc3ie 3t t`x bullding. Tbv wz af ttr~
t"c1i1l.?U?s 5f53~l b2 V3'1°d b°~'a!r_-•r, tvJ(ilfl1gs
t
~ ~ . ~ _6'. ~ ' ~ ~I ~
- - ~ •
~ ~ : ~ •
` ~ r•
-
1 ~ ~ i ~ T • • , ~ . r. .
~ - _ , ;i►~
A i ~ - - -
-
a ArGajt3Lbn ts the giv►ng a emp,z3st; :z ~Nke window:, L'aiwn+a, erttrte5, eCL. j, m3L Credtee aCornphmenta,y
p3arm or &I , , dNtdhj !t►e bulkflnqs irbn srriaIbr identLtiable pietts.
h. Modulation Is a rneawred and propoRioned iriflect►on uti a buHdiry's f~~e To3etn-a- -x-it►_ula:4c)n, „oju:aUzr. and their ve3*..'.' 3
5p-rtse d 3caN irtr_ rt3n* to -~~d~ntiai b1lijing7,
;at!~ r3sxd: Mon:.", N,sy 9, 23M
ORD 0300 Se^JOi :
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meedng Date: May fi, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check atl that appty: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearir.a
❑ informatlon 0 admin, report ❑ pending tegislaUo-i
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft 2009 - 2014 Transportation Improvement Program (TiP)
GOVERNING LEGiSLATION: RCW 35.77 010, Perpetuai advanced six-year pians for
coorainated transportation pragram experiditures
PREViOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2008-20 ~ 3 Six Year TIP las' year on June
26, 2007. Resolution #07-008 PubIEc Heanng on proposed Amendpd 2008 TIP on April 22
2008
BACKGROUND: Tne City is required by RCW 35.77 010 to prepare and after public heanng
adopt a revised and extended compr+ehensive transportation program for the ensuing six
c.alendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of
Transportation before July 1" of each year.
The attached draft 2009 - 2014 Six Year TIP represents a preliminary update to the 2008-2013
adopted Six Year TIP. This ftrst draft should be considered a'work in progress' and will be
updated again prior to the Public Hearing scheduled for June 10, 2008.
OPTIONS: Discuss revised project I+st and/or project schzdules
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide feedback and direction to staff
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS As the propased 2008-2013 TIP continues to evolve staff
will coordinate wth the Finance Department to ensure the proposed 2008-2013 TIP projects are
budgeted within the Street Capital Projects fund.
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director;
Steve Worley, Ssnior Enginesr - Capital Projects
AT7ACHMENTS- Draft 2009 - 2014 Transportation Impravement Program
e
1
I
` p okane
..;oOValley,
fIVc Y[AR ANNIVlIfSARY U1' IHG011PQKnlIOrJ
Morc=fi 31, ;003 Io Mr~rCh :jl. :UOfi
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
DRAFT
2009 - 2014 Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program
Draft 2009 - 2014
~ tle Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
4;000 Vallevv ilntlnrqin Ilknimw~do
Fundiitg
ProJect ! Descriplioil 1 Ctirront Stalus LengUi PE RW CN Total Saurces 2U09 2U10 2011 2011 2013 2014 Total
I I'lI1C,ilM:111Sf IC1C1 t i~Aj ~yG Clty ~U!"i lUG
WSDOT iU 10
TPA 710 7111
i i'i= 1-nl~.1.1 vlll ~e[onti;{t~r=. I'le 1'VL'. pq o' 1-1 ii.t al 11 wlll el5n v:ido:i onr, ton4lri.iC1 A4inchaH !ivn f'oni OIlVOtO(1 212 Ztl
tu a-i•-t,ir.I• T Fia:;way @rlt
CMAO 4&a 163
STA t0; 1dr
t'roJoct TotA! 1,790 1,796
~ E3cirker Road 13ricl9o tr,g OR 3.031 3,631
cny : ~~A 204
Uther "~1,t 124
IePIaGB hr.d00 #i:ifi?. ur.rvr
YlujeCl l(del 4,159 `i.1 ~.9
.s ApPlcwaylSpraguelDishman-Micn ITS - IyU to :'i City 5u 60
Dishman Mice CMAp `73 323
wsnoT
l11':ir;•r.p s;qnal cunlmlierc at ili qdg~;f':tr~r.; ln:tall rrrni~, i: ~tm; h~i~•! ~:~I•le anr r.pnnn~"ii :.{t'T~1VC rnn~r~l Ry;t~•ii
F
Piu}eL t Total 313 37%
~;TLP t'avebac:k t trn; Ciry 9U0 80U 9t10 2.7041
SW 20(1 701) ?00 b00
!'iujeul Tt,lal 7,tU0 1UU 1,11.00 3.300
ulPn"I'iPl n~ I~ n I U' :n.. 1, 1m i niuiL•'Pil ~:7nLlS^: uf~A~ 'A fd In.u. InJP_ ~IIiBI ].3r->ly i, ~ u~ ,no:a~d,••..
-lIR IiiIC"dt 'C+li.
S,,,.,,, C Draft 2009. _..14
e Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
.Illill;YallIllIllova 1 ley Fundin
ti
Prujed 1 Description I Current 5tatu6 I.anyth PE RW CN Total Sources 2009 200 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
- 5 51rep1 Nreservation Projc~ct - Varivu~: Slreet 0 u 11 i+~>3 c.uy ! 1<<> >.~:n 2;a :2 t,i ~.;~,u ~~c~!~ 1U.A53
5yy G~l fr(: [>'':i 1 1.11 111 GUU
Anitunl cireo! i•t CSLyV:jlir,•i 11 rc;Ier.ts
f'rvlect Tulal 1,293 1,293 1.293 1,191 2.3~J1 2,:711I 71,053
ck [jroaclway Avc 18O It E. al Moure tu Flura ~ n ci, ~,~r,r; •;~,ri City 12 'A z 1r,1
IIAI' 1,41.1
i-wicllriv Sscurwd 1TiF1 11119-L'--208(001)-1;
t"rtyef-t fulal BO 1.7Gtl 1,; Gll
~ Appleway - Universily lu Lverfarevti L12 3 W 7,7j4 1 • .'00 ctty 121 2013 ~~8 77G
sTr 409 1,040 2.026 4,076
wsoo7 4 s 4rau 4cT
>>1.1 lI-way 11t~~1 'vrl' n n,nib Ir~~jr' Irv ildy u'. I ul' :y ~ u•tc' n rt ~;~~;~tiv~alhc UCP 4,200 4.200
Ollto► 409 11,610 2.013
i~~~~:.i7';~1,r~q. ,.~ili :":',~~,~r
I'rujetl Tulal 937 2.869 7.734 11,630
u WSDO,I" Urban fiamp ProJects - Uruaclway, CRy 300 300
Argonno, Froya 11C
nrvrii ftehn.~ o( in [onjunelwn wslh W':I tl ) I 1.7n;~1 Prn~~,.-••.
Profpct Iulal JUt) 300
t-ruieUa a:id iinKl;amee ~1t,r,dmu tn ntn i1P are t:) :m ~.t,r.►~le:a:l astunali.s .nJy Liat :ra'i cNanqo ilun Iu ri va ie!, a.
are rwl ntavnie0 lrl' ino CNy lu Ls tellet) uixm UY tm0ojly onrnnrs cw UevAkjpwf in mtkinp da+ilo"M dimuewa
.
4i: I; oyn ~
Draft 2009 - 2014
~1 11 1 I J ■ I~~
f ~L<
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
4;000 V411 lev DoNars!n ihuuaoai~s Fundin
J y
Pro}ect ! Descrfptlon ! Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sourcos 2009 1010 2011 2012 2U I J 2014 Tntal
r:r~~ ,•1i f:it
f Ines/5{,rai~uc~ {nlersec:Uuii f,C;C ii v 152
:TA 640
1'iojar.t fowd 747 74:
M 44th Ave F'at}ivlay :;ands tu Wuc,clrtili I ull i city 44 44
SfF'jFl ~"-•1 Z84
I~ill :',ilt,Wn, v:' hil.t,
~J Iwrnd nu Srei.uiErU -IDE.iFi v l0 20af1 tri (j,~.;IP v~r ~JUi l, r
f'rnmct Tp1.71 :%Z(! ?1~
Broa(iway Avcnitr. (leh;+b It'l- Fancher lo J,i ~ ~ "A" CNy n2
STPIU)
Thierman
;r.iHt arl,l I'Ildy VlIIIt !~rlCh135 Cf .liph'W runCrate n~~VVI~~Pn1
f i~nruny `_;ecurnq ;'~r'1{ (~f~
Pru}ec.l Tulal G00
12 Park fload - Il `l (PE Only)- Qruaclway lo Incliana n~5 ~i ciry 11 u 4 n
r Tf'~UI ;,rI :tflq
~,.-~~i~~_.:~nt: ir~~ ' l~r r•-, ..i11 I~ t~ L~ ~ _ .,-~ii _ L ,~~;II
Funding :;orural (SRTf; i)E',• 1 t ~
Pro)qct i qlil 3G2 15Z
('~u~ei fi n,vJ tulxharr~y. ~~I~n:d~e~ il~ tt~c~ i ~I' nirv l~~ i~C ..uli4litEr2J `51nn0;P5 ~u.li lt~d; 'Ills Chai~UE ~iU~ lu d v.>~u,P, n~ n ~.I.1- - Zn
u c in•I t itnnw)! [Ir•vptn,,r.i.. ~n iiinV InJ '~nvt+L~;m~inn~ ilc: Iti i:.'
Draft 2009 __14
~pUkanL) Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~ .Al.ley DtjUrs In ihnuaercls Funding
Proiocl / Daecriptlun / Curront SIaWr Lcnflth PE RW CN Total Sourr-et 2009 'lUill 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
13 SuIllvanlSprague Interseclion PCC u.1 83 0 770 001 city 116 >>c
57P(U) 745 74G
!+f•t~l~r•, :ii~l,•~l asl !i~ll ~iav•,n~t~nl w~~h poilla+ul i i•~~;:n-~t~~ cr•rnei.t
Projoct TotA! tt61 E~T 1
14 Mansiield Exlension - SR27 to Miraboau 051 161 075 1.448 1.404 Clty 207 290 497
F'arkway unn uz~~ • ~~~n ;.hu;
Cunstitiri "i-lano artonnl tTom PinRC In Mnrbeau VaAway
f'ro)ocl7oWl 1,U36 1,440 2,4114
15 Florn Road - Sprngue la Mi55ion I 2D7 300 1673 7 271 Gfly Ou 29H 260 6 5 5
UAP 35fl I!09 1 UG9 2.616
1{etnnnhur:t Ir~ n I~unP-tan~ ~ilaual
1'rojQCl Total 447 1,487 1,337 3.271
16 Spreguv Avo. Resurfncing ProJect 'I- Uiilversily 2 `G, 1,13 1 0 c;, 856 G+►y : ,uyj z.or~1;
to Evergresn
r• fi, i•i I iniV F -,i"r f{il t~ f vPI tJ'='r1i. !,'ii
f'roject To1a1 2,06G 't.115G
'~ir.~de 3nri U•-~-~,~~rnr.t ~~la,i'u~a.l u~ ~•.:e 71~' atF L~ I.o ri:srlc+~~-1 p=Ln~a'na „~~P/ I'.,~t i~~:~y ;.I~auy? il~P I~, a ~a~iHly ~ c~urnc'.ini!~r. ~i.
YtB rwl m:e:~le:l IrY 1t~ LIIY 1o b~ ia:ie~) n;>nn Iry:7iflfsify u1%Twt3 vf iIBV81v{nm% Itt 111891,1,ij UNW0O(ifi18'4 d£-C16wi"5
4!ZOJ79U(1 1'auP 4
Draft 2009 - 2014
Sj~dCam Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
Fundln
a
Project 1 Ueacription I Curront Slaluu LQnyth PE RW CN Tolal Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Totn!
17 Evergrecn/Sprague Intersection nCC I I!' " clty :13~1 233
STA c~ljil 900
tinpface axphnlt navemeul with poriland cemenl concmle
Funili'I'a FecIiIet1 d STn (I 3",•~~ sAles lar Mvy apl>rovad
P~uject Total 1,133 l,Tl:t
IndianalSulllvan Intersuction PCC +.141? Ciiy »r. 275
srn •.;r.>; 1,u67
FF;il~v~ e aa~i?i,ll! ;r.i~:n~r~Pn' ~dl~ ;~O~Ilin~t !':triwn! ~,t!~lt:'t!lE p ~'arr~i~l
run{Uuta ser.urcjci i! tA LI, i1% saies tnx iNV; lI~I,ruved
f'ru}eLl futal 1.342 1.342
10 Pnrk Road - Bridging the Valleyl BNSF Grade u: 90U z.ooo 13.0211 16.518 ciiy 31 eo 21815 286 6e3
5eparailon fMSlf3 777 651 2,061 2,061 6.001)
Oltwr 364 1.045 3,308 3,308 8.075
f'ed
Reconsl~u+:t ►'nr~ st„ait Iv sapa 11i;n Ihn yra,ieA uf llai b ftuau and !.'iR f3NSF iailroad Iracta Othor• 37 t04 310 334 E01
RR
UC:N 441 .'~~i~ i]Zn r,.~1 1.D8a
i:1fiizi f icr.ifiiF4 tiom I.aN:;f IM
Isriiject lolnl TGU 2,150 G,flUU 6,1109 16,510
11 Si~r ayue Ave. Resurfacin~ f'rojrct 2- '1 f.~~2! 2e56 City 2,~~ 2,866
Evargrcan Rd lo Sullivan IZcI
f~~-F~IIIIR~.!! .`~l'!~iJl~2 ~~•+p'~Un t_tiF~ J~~p'1 I?'.1 ~i 5uI'P~Fi'1 ~iC~
ProJoct Tvlal 2.056 2.111515)
I'•ur-Lla Xid w'lie (I!' 'vP Ir. L.P. !_(:nrH t•..,. ; o4;irnalFS tho: ni.iv rt;aiiya uua h; a v. ~inty rl rr:vinFlaru n_ q'~
.i:e rn.d ndu•Id, i:dy ti, lae 'elxd ~[iun t'l '+vife.s .~~.nvrlr.~,•rs .n rreY.:~y ~lrorF~.,f~•~.,~~~I ue:'siw.3
, „ _ Draft 2009 • _ _ 14
pO~RC Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
,;ooOVal 1ey Dnparc in Tfaiusanrri
f undfng
Projcrct ! DescrlpNon ! Currnnt Status Lonptti PE RW CN Total SoUrco9 2009 2010 'lUi 1 2U12 2013 2014 Total
l~ Siillivan Itonv (PL n~ily)- EucUd lo Wt~llesley u 1,:ir c;u~ t3;~ au
STA10I 15 51G
Fun•:in{} ::~~.ii~a~.l ~:~R 1 t: ~~f,.
Projoc! 7'olat GUG 595
S '
22 SulUvan Road North Exiansion (Bigolow Gulch)
Reennslnjr,l and widon tho Supivan (<oac1 oAtonoinn norlh atco F.nnwn x-, Flogetnw f;iilr.h Ito❑c: to n-1-larie mnuway wit'i
fS-tout shuulcler5 and a :Z t;ii>I Iwu wrr; 1nfl Nim L'ino
f'to}ett Total G9 GG
23 McQonaldlSprAguQ Intersciction PCC 1> 10~% ii t~r,I t.ut;o Clty 219 Zte
STA iiGU ftG0
RoplaLe ai-phail puveman! wlih ~?o•~tnnn renient rr.rxrn!t~ Im,re!neni
Fun+ling sec_n+rJ If ;lA U 3':24 snles laA kwy apprr}vnd
f'rojoci Total 1.088 1,069
za graadwnylSulliven Int.ersecUon F'CC t' 1211 0 M 1 110 Gity 153 VO
STA 911
RCO18C8 86pI?8II PSV6R19f1t WHII pnittnnd tr--nF~il ! i.rn~irn:osiite, it
Fiinovip 5F?i:int=J I' Sf/1 saNas ip• Ir•vy ipi,ru~Pd
prujecl Total 1,;10 1,730
"fulncta arul UrnefrauYe6 nlvnll`neJ - It.p f lf' a!e V.i IJn I.Id1RN7QIM1 nR:inistei r-iiy lhal nwy :.hn<<yn uun ui u vs;lety d .,n ii "ct:c rnc an
nta iwl inNmdaJ by I7m CAy W De reile+l upon W proVSih uwnas ar ttsvebpen m makmp devek"rrnt deuans
•1~:1it,~;,~~~i~, (rnqn ct
op~ Draft 2009 - 2014
SPo~ne Six-Year Transportation Improvement Proyram
~ val ley l,pt,Ka-~.
Fundfng
Projor_tlDeacriptiunlCurrentStatus Lonylh PE RW CN Tatal Sources 2009 ZUtU 2011 2012 70 13 1U14 Tulal
llryonne rz~LId - 190 io 'rI El►is L:►iy ; ,11 1
CMAp ~;yr, 1.1 t 1
~'wv~5w.~lunit~ Vii091i1J, Add Nfl f=u11J ~~.r i,~i-~• f~, f.1",,;u.~~i•!..-~ I''Irv..n~JiI,iq i.',=•-i=.i I~ tl I ~
f;~~l~l~•~~7 :i~~i.crett (51711: il , i i
Sullivan Roa(i Wesl Elri(itlc
i W
1'iuJecl fvlal 73G 735 4.UGG d,USG 9.582
<<i l3roaciway Ave - flura lc, Barkm n Gity 6:1 50 5r5 E7u
M) r.7G1 2,712
UCP :51 n
fte_t,q=!n:r,t Ir- "i-~;wr•s Fhm io F;arFer
f'rujocl Tulal 314 260 2.826 7.390
Apploway•Thicrtnan L=L3 Lan- 0~j-: ir. City Tri
C. tAA U 2
. _ ~-f:`, t.ll'I :ti ~~~ir. ~;~1~,'I'I.+~•.p:,; 'I-R~~i1:3'I
1'ri-jmJ (utal 26 I61 tr7
I', .'.~-inl'itr.--r.,u:. ~r._~;~l~rd,.i lll'.~'~~ , ir i~',ul:-i~,,. ~.Ini•.i'r. ~~iy pi~.~~..~n n;9~~c•y..! ,i..i~~.
,i - n~ i, iiu. ~p I. ~~li I~~ I.:~ ~~I r i, i.~i~ i!nn*',". ~.~cdr:r. •'i c i r.J ~.i ,.:iin.~~ ~ic, ii.~ i.~
~.•~'~;'l'~fi I~Ii~JF ,
, ~ Draft 2009 • 14
Spokanc Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
.;.OO-l111ey GUIIe7t6111 7IiUulOfMiF
FundlnU
Pro}act 1 QeBCription 1 Current Statue LongUi PE RW CN Total sourcos 2009 2010 2011 2012 1013 2014 Total
Mlssloii Ave - Flora b Barkcr Ilt,)il :1.1'5 "iqll 3 ,lU4 ,'dr Gily }t4 34 U :StU 749
UAP iycl t 46 1 ' 2,1 I 1.99R
fJ~1v :~-la~ie se~+ Iwn } knra irflnn r~
F'rulacl Total 496 1,701 1,561 3,747
Dishmen Mica Rehab - 16th to Schafer & 11 210 0 1,270 1,500 Ctty 202 202
Bowdlsh to City Lfmits strlr'► 1,298
I-,nnqrinlay BXi9hnq fOA[tway
Pro}ocl Tatal 1,500 1,500
j1 Saltesel5ullivnn Signal 3r+ 15 MA ata cny 104
Uthor 42 42
Ult1Ar it~~'. 'lliA
li••:ut,i.Iri~iUi rr~ '~~i,lr.ri~, i;~;~il~
Pruject Totol 414 414
34 1'ines Corridor 175: Sprngue to 7i-ent •'2: 150 1 +,1 z,±'ni c Ily 280 zno
CMAQ 1 N~~1 1,001
(r,ITliC :,ipnat Conbol :aY6l?tri ';il Cuir:lu'
1'ruJecl Total 2,001 2,001
0iu)ei.ls arnl wsnharrroa eRNi:i(ieri n; it~e liI ' nro tn bo c,.inn ide; au etlui%aloe rady Ihat ntay clia•iqs, il:.e I u u v ai••lv n' n.ir~-:hr n~, mu
nol Ullarrled by Uie Clly lu Los toleU uwn tryr prLpofty owners pr ctovolppert In rtmkiny deuelcrpmerit Aet:idura
Draft 2009 - 2014
S~ ~A ~ilC
1~ Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
.4;Atittittiova'ley Un~on in i!~~~aarrn
J fimdinp
f'roject / Dascription I Current 5tnlus Lengtli NE RW CN Tutal Sour-ces 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Tutal
35 L3ar ker Roacl - l1pplQwey lo Clroadway llvenue ..1 %gi 2,11 t 1,100 1:~an ir.f, cuy ~ 516 ;89 •nn cas
Uqp I1 150 %54 2.532
I~.~ a liur IanP a:,a•ial wi llI ri!f1l?I Inrlt IAI3n f!niu /1Ilu ;tf r;-ylvv:ry n:r nsliprIF,-r,a, hvn; e,ast:~
fla~ i,F
f'rnJftcl lcital ITO 1.445 942 '+.1fi5
JG Vark Ronci - tl2 (CN Gnly)- liro:idway lu Indiann c~~,.i~ : s;~~ ~.3.r.• City 2110 314 684
SiP(Ul 1 ;30 Li•; 3.71117
I'r, ~ ti.' - Rre:~rlsl~i~~ 1,ti -iI rou;r'ri li ? if" .v:ll) hlt,.1 ;ni.e, '11.n SUlnW~Ili: z'
Projod iioiai 2.000 z,slr 4.32e
37 32nd Avenuc - CverijroRn to E3esi n:~r, 70D ; u'i; Clty 21 24 95 ttn
GOS 091
STP(Il)
f;•~C•7n5~,r' :~nit ~1'I7nn 1.; th~ee IHrinc wit11 r.urli, c;;nl ~.'pCwr+I•=.
{'trcyed Totril SG3 1JG 703 1,031
jU Evurgrevn132ne1 - 1 Gtii io 32nd, L-verUi c+en ta ~~~!r . ~ ~~r~! •ti Ai" Clty tnu l55 063
3,344
SR-27
~:f•i _ill',~IIII.~ iil'il' N~~'f~il ~'.r "I~f~.~ ~.]'1~•~,
Nro~ecl Tulal 57G 1.GU1 A,201
Ie_tr. ;hIunP!'Arrr= ~ 1^~~!dm•s In (In, ii:• I hn n[n:.l es:luie:n;,.ir~ UiX ii'n. r rn:,l.l,- !im I, i~ ~nrn~ti~ rv .~~~r:l~~ u r,;
nr~'~ nnt i~~nl~~le .I. It~ :•h(~~) ~~~,nLY Ii- ~jj
4
e ~ Draft 2009 • 14
Spokanc Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
j~~ ley Ch~flsi~ i+i IfKiwnnus Pundin
g
Project! Uescriplion f Currtnt Stetus Longtlt PE RW CN Total sou«es 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Tnwl
39 Barkcir Roaci • tflli tu Appli-way 4uy ;s eu a!ru Gaa
UCp 227 140 1,469 1,u1Z
lilhor •',t •1011 G44
"i rr•-Lii~r. uitia ii aiir-iial'
f'rcqoct Totnl J71 AW 2,449 5.2.0
Sullivan Road (RWlCN anly) • kuclicl tu Wciie:;lry I I (Aly I G11 545 706
STI,(U) 64U 2,1E10 2.820
(~t![.~~i;li ;;:~'~i ~;r~n~i tani~ i~iL•~rt ~it~n;il
Pr~~ject Tcii.1l 000 2,715 3,525
Pines Corridor (TS' SprnguC ta 16th ' 45 11 090 W, Clh •nG I uc
CMno r, r9 679
Ir,;"u. C;IUnal ~unl~~l ~~ste•i~ fn- C:vi-bti~r
i'rv*l Tolwl 705 TOfi
•~3 Sullivan Road Itchnt) - Indiatia lu [i.iclid 1 fly:J cI eIty 7% 126 14n
srn(P) ~ ~i ; uou oUl
f'ruiei.l lntnl 166 935 1,100
I' i,i(.>..1; ei•, I.,:ni~:l - bltriil.! Flii ~ tl~n ~ II' it'~ 1;. i:.~ ~.~zul~~irPl ~ s~.ir..~'rb ~~,~dv ~ :T~ ~ ~ .;a . ~ 7 .~zi =I~ ,i ~ ci t ~i~r.l'U',~ ..~r ~I~
a-n imt Iri1Cnirw1 br llw GAy tU lw roliml 1011(141 bY prrnncty mr'xsa u+ JwrnkilW► liti nu4uiy dereli.prvlcnl ~Zew1:-Is
Draft 2009 - 2014
„
~ 01- ~ Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~ -(i~ ~~y Il~~lla~c m If,ni~anuc
Fund(ng
Pra)ect / Uoscripti(in 1 Current Slatus Lengtli PE RW CN TotAI Sources 7009 2010 2011 2U11 2013 2014 Total
3211d Avc Rehc►b - Dishman Mica lo Sft-27 1 31"1 111: u i. 1ti+u 1 '110 cuy 1.62 'y:
y1i:,(i3) 103 1 036 1,2119
ewiS:llot; 'CtadWlv
Pmjcct Tutal 212 1,198 1,41U
<~a Carnahan 1'rtick Lane - t3th lo City Umlls u s 234 u , 1134 cuy 32 32
CIIFl{tII
Pro}ect Tatal 234 234
~r Appteway Exte.nsion - Evorgreen l0 7sliirley tl 3,1 11.7•4 City tt;t 113
gTp t?I 721
Oihor
SWto
Cx Ionri Aj,}d-A- ay [Ilv(l wit'i A f'llllirlAith tac:l.ty i,-] Ouilinu uirt'y a•Id sidarrall;s UGP
f'rn)ocl Tulal 831 034
413 Unworslty Road Inlay 2: 15th to 4111 r,'~ 5; ;1 '162 nn ; City au Go
srn(P) :,e i 381
I;~ui;l tink1 08ve wuh ; InLIIes iif usphail conr,rnia pavemert
f'tufgcl TVtnl ~IAi 441
~1 ui... (:li.rv; P:Pn;ii.,.I ~~•.p I1' Ri~ tI'.. ..li1F.- :,u. I0 i.IntjP ~I'o.
I„ .,rl~.~y . ~ nR~~~iu.. .~~i_. ~~i 1 •1F I ~.r , 1<~ nhr.,i I,' , -I~~ ~;.n .'r. ~i ,i~•.t• ~~~Fi I~ ~PI u~~ ~b.Vrli ~in~a~ I i.r~ i~.n
Draft 2009 • 14
~~m Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~V411 k-y f3t,Nars Iri Thou3a4itls
Fundinli
I'rujecl I Descriplfoti I Curront Stattia Lgngth PE RW C!N 7ota1 Sources 2009 2010 2U11 2011 2U13 201d Total
University Koacl Irilay 1: Uishrnnn-Mic:a Rc1 lu " City 2.0
15111 /1Vp ST( vl to
::iin~ :~nil ~•a~~• ti~,l~i nr, I~e=_ n~ as~,~~nll ; u~r rele t'~~•,~rent
1'ra~eci T~fal U~1 ~9
F'ark Road -M3 - Sprngue to Broadway 14 Cby 17
gTp(U) 122 121
Otfwr , 7
f:4~~.•m~,l~iicl anc1 wirlen tn n 50anc1nrl lhree-LanA flrterinl gireel wtlh r,iirbc onrl sidt+wadcs. PCC on Hroartwn/ UCP
f'ro)acl Tutal ldt lAl
53 Eiarker Road - 5pokane River lo Trenl 1 4 3(K1 (I M:ti cNy 41 41
srn(u? : G:' 762
I;ecursli u: l tu ;i 'hrra-lan~~ r.urLad :iilei::il
In f :~ri~Itlin;itl~+i w' CiTV
f'm)ocl Tutal 303 3U3
Euclid Avo! Flora Rd - 1=1orn Euclid to Eticlld, 3; 4' L' 311+ citY 51 '1
Euclid Flora to Barkvr
i?nL:nltAhU('1 ifl pff)V1d0 B lilf90lBflC~ =:1'fi.ili.r•inrl tfif'r nl
f'roiect Total 3;To %79
{',njn'.ti anu tuueUtiu:NS ulanbiMd 1:4 I'w 111' mn lu Pr i,~~r.a.Jo:rol Peanules c4ily Ihal rnBy c-:wa:Va tiue 1u a ra,wP, n' rur.unwlanuns ;no+e wl o'lencfeU by Iite Cdy 4u tre felied u{wn W propBrly uvrne'e a Jsvelulxvz m mokukp derelu{xmn1 dea111h,1;r.
4r?I~~i(~!lA Paue 17
Draft 2009 - 2014
~[Cane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~Valjey ~u6aii m ilu~u~nnde FUlldlfl
e
Project I pescriptwn ! Current Stntus Lpnglh N[ RW CN Totnl Sources 2009 1.010 2U 1 1 2012 2013 2014 1 otal
Fu1i1li.: 10,616 17.449 94,5115 111I,602 16,24U 16,ry.1 77.3:I4 23.616 ZA.340 1:1.1132 117.469
~''•.ip'~.-1: dl~~l Illnr.!:1:~•~q.,Jn•,l~lnni m Uie ill' Arr~ I.r li~ CGI15hIFlu,~ CRI•:•.fi!P4 niti'i flial in.t: ttB'ql" .li~n h: a v3viB1Y''J fii-riitnEl.vu
p~P t1. ,1 PJEItJfi :sB r0l,ai1 -.r1 irn t-.1- fnnly I ~Rlw•S - n fa,nhqipt" .,i rnab il~•flAtr,
4i~[?;i~h?Ci 1'qlja 1
~ Draft 2009 014
~nL Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
vcllley
Six-Year Transportation improvement_Prog.ram Totals
Secured Projects Planned Projects Totnis
Year Federnl Statu Other City Year Fodoral State Other City Year Fodeml State Other City
2009 S6.276 S770 i1,790 33,430 20119 $409 $4 3,11,893 S3,662 2009 30.685 S780 33,683 57.092
2010 S t.O t A $1.360 30 12.892 2010 $2.162 $1,/54! x3.474 $3,927 2010 S3,1 T6 S3.125 i3.474 56,81 u
2011 S2.41 J SO SO 'i2. 77A 2011 36.843 i9,1 3G 3414 31.759 2011 S6_25G 59,136 $414 ¢4.5 _s;'.
2012 $U SU SU $2.392 2012 $9,041 38.955 i404 S2.221 2012 S9,644 t11,955 4404 f4,611
zo» xu so so s2.391 xoia $14,090 $5.120 $nio $2,37N zu» s14.09e sg.+:v $aiu s4.1
201e xo $a $n s2.39 1 2014 s6,720 $1,4ee s497 s1.747 2014 s6,120 5 1.09 s491 s4.131)
1ot31 S11.103 $2,142 $1,7Up }1fi,270 Tul:tl S3[I,0(14 iZG,Ad'J $7.092 $ 15,645 'Total S115.687 528,685 $0.082 131,91fi
m El. i InnnFnn As idenLTir 1 u. R•n I II' ain :liF i_unrodamu k!r.li niataq u'~Y Ir.At r.:ay r.C:nn;ri' 'lue :r, a vm.eIy u• L uuI I nntdnC nn A' -
.~ir uil rdrnue[: ~~y I~,n Ir ln ha irli~ci ilnrIW aqerty >n,ie =',lrorln~.nr~ unv3binq d.vvlr.qrnnnl lorir.ion.
u . 11;1L' f'ay~ 1
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public W'ork;
S;x Year Transportation improvemant Progran
wl no idenhned Loc31 FrSath within the 2009 Shc-Year TIr'
~~Ili!S 1^ T~1PfiLeR~i
p~•~~ ~ ~ Itrt Y~ ittal Cst
Av-nu° Pna5- Carnartan tz RecansWCt 9ih Avs tz a three-lane -5 s' =1=
a^a yectlon wfth ourb, gutter. s•:iewalks
and h6ct lanes.
n A ti3"~U° .:"35° r'1f1; _ ~.°y' RDGOT1S1flll S2?7 AVt T: e 'hfe„-+-I8 ie S.. ~
S~'L110f1 WfttI GU!b. OUCiz.'. 5wj3u.alrs
and bdcr tanes
3.7 Avan_it f'"iatse_ ~-Di:Jct!r L ReconStruct Bth Ave to a th-ee-lar,r
Camnhan SeCilOn MIIt71 Ct1►b, oUttar. 5►dewalk5
an3 hiks lenss
3a-kar R:;ad 's2eqn+StrJ'.:YfDt1, 32nd 1D Spokane County PtaeCt. 20' n
31n RecortstruC 8arker to 3-Lans
Secb9h. Cll'Y PafUlet RtaiCh
37wjhr. :71:'a~- -:?r,~ _ 3:~• Recanstrvct and widen roa0wayte 2c 15 S<,593
three Ianes
3R271?irt-_s/15th Intarscrion tmprovemeMS tD intarse=bon (DusJ 2015 S3_3132
lana R3undaDa.97)
lr,tve-sRy'Spraque In4nrse-zbon aCC Rsplex aspnanpavement wnr ,
poRfand cerr►znt cancrsta pavarnen.
?,;r,,.zr r?osd Rshab - Dishman 2' Greid and Inlay existin rzad ='2 iS~ ~0
h.~t-a t_ 32nd
ToGals: 51 B,5!s
F:.,Jt= an:: r" tht ',T nra t_ `V.?: o~' a ' ,-t, . a: _ : 11.'I
mlan]Od Oy tw CRy 6D be rLlm-2 ~Pa'• bf 7roWN tMnx3 0~ J-_nioUt *s in rnaany ie++slovmsn! D~cLOn_
ati 4C~~ ~ ~:~cp-,.~~ t ~t
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY•
Request for Council Action
1 ~
Meeting Date: May 6, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ Consent ❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing
❑ Information 0 Admin. Report ❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane County CDBG/HOME Consortium Participation
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: Consistent with HUD requirements, Spokane County is now due to re-qualify
in 2008 for fiscal years 2009 through 2011. This re-qualification requirement results in the City
again the position to decide whether to renew its participation in the County COBG/HOME
Consortiurn or 6ecome a direct entitlement recipient from HUD. In order for Spokane County to
meet its obligation under the HUD requirements the City must p'rovide written notice of the City's
decision by May 23, 2008.
City staff has been in contact with Spokane County staff regarding the option of Spokane Valley
recsiving a set-aside based on historical CDBG awards directly to the City as outlined in the
April 16, 2008 memorandum on this matter. Tim Crowley with the County's Community
~ Development Department provided an email (attached), which addressed several issues relative
to the set-aside option including a suggestion on the funding method, alternatives to "multi-year"
funding, city projects continuing to be consistent with the County's Consolidated Plan priorities,
. and assumptions related to the City continuing to comply with other program requirements.
As noted above, the County is requiring a response in writing by May 23rd regarding the City's
continued participation in the County Consortium or contacting HUD in the event the City opts
out of the Consortium and decides to become a direct entitlement jurisdiction. The timing of the
City's action and the timeline in Mr. Crowley's email (#5) indicate a conflict between the time the
City must notify the County and the time it will take for County staff to present the set aside issue to the County HCDAC for a recommendation and a decision by the Spokane County
Board of County Commissioners (BoCC). Mr. Crowley is in the process of checking with HUD
regarding the deadline and whether an extension may be available so that the City will have the
BoCC decision prior to the City's decision on participation in the Consortium. Staff will provide
any new information regarding this issue at the May 6"' meeting. •
OPTIONS: N1A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP - Planning Division Manager
;'Attachment: Tim Crouvley email RE: CDBG Urban Requalification
Page I of 2
Chris Bainbridge
i,~•,~ii: Greg McCormick .
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 3:35 PM
To: Chris Bainbridge
Subject: FW: CDBG Urban Requalification
;hris, here is the email for attachment to the CDB6 RCA.
7reg. =rom: Crowley, Tim [mailto:TCrotivley@spokanecounty.org]
:ent: Friday, April 25, 2008 10:33 AM
io: Greg McCormick
:c: Barada, Christine; Stretch, Patrick iubject: CDBG Urban Requalification 3reg,
Fhanks for your information concerning a possible CDBG set-aside for the City's high pnoriry projects. As we discussed briefly
,esterday, I hope to touch on a few programmatic and timing issues for consideration andlor further discussion. I also understand
hat the amount of set-aside funding ($275,000-$300,000) was determined by averaging the tofial amount of CDBG funding the City
lirectly received over the past 5-years. Please let me know if I'm not correct in my understanding. Here are some of my thoughts
inu ieral assumptions that I've made in providing you with areas that may need to be identified in your briefing material.
1. Since the annual formula allocation varies from year to year, a method for determining a set-aside that takes this into account
should be discussed. Please consider a method in dealing with escalation-de-escalation of annual formula amounts.
2. A set-aside could also be utilized as a"multi-year" funding activity or activities that currently meet a high priority need and
national objective. In this way the City may only need a portion of the maximum set-aside amount in the first year, with
increased funding in the second and or third year of the activity or activities. Or, IeYs think about a situation where the City
needs funding for a project that exceeds the set-aside amount. Could the HCDAC commit additional funds to the activity
during that year with an understanding that a future project amount vrould be balanced or averaged over the 3-year
qualiflcation period? 3. Since our current Consolidated Plan will be in effect for 2009, the City would be required to meet existing high priorities etc
that are identified in the current plan. We will be developing a new 5-year Consolidated Plan that will incorporate updated
information and possible changes in local priorities etc.
4. I have identified a few program assumptions that I am making in reference to creaflng a set-aside, and not a pass-though
arraignment, within our current timeframe that does not trigger a substantial amendment process. Generally, the City would:
. Continue to be required to follow public notification requirements.
. Submit timely, appropriate and complete applications for set-aside funding.
. Activities would have to be consistent with meeting national objectives, consolidated plan principals and high priority needs.
. Continue to be defined as a Subrecipient. In other words the City could not sub-grant or pass-thorough set-aside funds to
another entity or entities; and not include administrationJplanning funding as part of the set-aside amount.
-,,,,Support the existing advisory committee structure, under our current By-laws.
l ~iAddress a formal request letter to Chnstine that outlines the specifics contained in establishing a set-aside proposal. The
proposal would first be presented (staff) to the advisory committee for an advisory vote; and, on to the BoCC (either at a
oonsent agenda meeting or public hearing.) ,
4/30/2008
. Page 2 of 2
. If the BoCC approved the set-aside then the Inter-local would be signed and forwarded on to the BoCC with the Inter-lacals of
the other cities and towns for adoption.
• If the BoCC d.id not approve the set-aside then you would still have the options available to you as specifed in the notice.
. Since we have not received an updated CPD Urban Qualifications Notice, I did receive notice that it is coming,'the Niay 231d
cutoff date to notify in the County and HUD (if you are opting out) needs to be checked out with HUD (I will look into this)
because this timeline limits the City's ability to pursue other options given the council timeline to finalize their decision on May
13. We may have to convene a special committee meeting for May 15 to consider the request; and before the BoCC on May
27tn as a Corisent Agenda Item. I will follow up with you concerning my question to HUD on their end date.
e this helps-you Greg. Give me a call if you have any questions. - Tim
.
0/2008
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
;
Meeting Date: May 6, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: p consent ❑ Old business O New business ❑ Public Hearing
❑ Information CD Admin. Report❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Amendment
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Growth Management Act (GMA) RC1JV 36.70A.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: The Growth Management Act (GMA) allows local jurisdictions to update
comprehensive plans no more than once a year. The City codified this process in the uniform
development code (UDC) in Section 17.80.140. The City received 8 privately initiated
comprehensive plan amendment applications prior to the November 1, 2007 deadline. All 8
requests are related to amendments of the comprehensive plan map. In addition to the privately
initiated amendments city staff identified text amendments to a number comprehensive plan
chapters including Chapter 1- Introduction; Chapter 2- Land Use; Chapter 3- Transportation;
Chapter 5- Housing; Chapter 7- Economic Development; Chapter 8- Natural Environment;
and Chapter 9- Parlcs, Recreation and the Arts. The majority of the text amendments are to
update data in tables within these chapters or to correct errors discovered in the Plan.
One major policy area being addressed in this year's amendments is contained in Chapter 2-
~ Land Use and is related to identification of future annexation areas for the City. This is an
intermediate step being recommended by staff that identifies existing Spokane County urban.
growth areas (UGA's) that are contiguous to Spokane Valley and will likely become assigned
UGA's for the City in the future. However, given the regional process of updating the County
UGA the actual designation of City UGA's may not occur for some time (12 to 24 months).
Planning staff's opinion is that identification of future annexation areas in existing UGA's where
previous environmental and capital facilities planning occurred by the County could allow for
annexations to take place prior the regional update process being completed.
One other chapter has policy changes recommended. Two policies related to flood plain are
recommended to be altered in Chapter 8- Natural Environment. These relatively minor .
changes to NEP14.2 and NEP14.3 address the maintenance, restoration, etc. of natural .
drainage systems and states that development should be consistent with the National Flood
Insurance Program. -
City staff will be presenting the comprehensive plan amendments to the Planning Commission
at a study session on May 1, 2008. Public hearings will be held at the May 81h anii 22nd
Commission meetings. .
OPTIONS: NlA RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
l
STAFF CONTACT: Greg fNcCormick, AICP - Planning Division Manager
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 6, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that appty: ❑ cflnsent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information 9 admin. report ❑ pending legislation .
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: WEDFA Tax Exempt Economic Development Bond, $30 million, Waste Managemznt, Inc.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Mr. Mercier will discuss the April 21, 2008 letter firom Washington Economic
Development Finance Authority, and accompanying draft resolution, conoerning a$30,000,000
Waste Management, Inc. project.
O
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETlFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: .
ATTACHMENTS:
~HIINGTON EC~~OMYC DEIIEIlJiOPl~EINTT
F1NA1@~ ~E AU-THOR.I7L`V
D ]FA I000 Second Avenue, Suite 2700 0 Seat.tle, j-i'A 98.104-1046
(206) 587-5634 a FAX (206) 389-2819
E-Mail: wedfrrC?wshfc..org
Manday, Apri] 21, 2008
Mr. Davtid Vlercier
City Manager '
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106
Spolkane Vailey, WA 99206
Re: Waslungton Economic Development Finance Authority (WEDFA) - Tax-ExempiJTaxable
Economic Development Revenue Bond I'rograms
$30,000,000 Waste Managernent, Inc. Project
17ear Mr. Mcrcier: .
~ Waste Management; Ine. is planning to purchase collection >>ehicles, containers and real estate to be used
a,s part of a solid wasie faciliey at 11720 151.Avenue Fast in Spokane Valley. They intend to fnance this
projec# and several other5 throughout the slat.e clirough the issuanas of N'JEIUF a's iax-exempt nonrecou.rse
economic development revenue bonds.
It is the policy of the WEllFA board only to issue bonds in suppori of projects which would be welcomed
by the local community. As part of the issuance process, therefore; we wrould like the Spokanc Valley
City Councd, as the jurisdiction with plannint, auchority over the project; to consider p2ssage of a
"Planning Jurisdiction Approval Resolution", i.n form substantially as attached, in behalf of the
Washington Economic llevelopnient Finance Authority- ON'FDFA) to issue tax-exempt mono3nic
development revenue bonds to f.inance the projECt.
We wiah #o emphasize that the only purposti of this resolu[ion is to approve Waste vianagement's use of
WEDFA financive for this project. It does not supplement or replace any portion of tlte normal pernutting
process. Thcre is no liability creatcd against the City of Spokane Valley, or any other political entity by •
issuance.of WEDFA's bonds.
We are planning to begin sale of the bonds i.n late dvlay. It would greatly assist our timing if the Spo}:ane
Valley City Council could consider thas approva] at an early meeting. I wauld appreciate it if you eould
send me a cop}= of che approved resolution should the Council look on our request favorably.
JOBSAIYD ECOIVOMIC DEYELOPMEllTT TH.ROUGH REVENlIE BOND FINAJVCING
NIr. David Mercier ' .
City Manager
City of Spokane Valley
Apri122, 2008 Paoe tvvo
Please let me know how we cau work togcthcr to faeilitaie this process. Ifyou have any questions, please
do not hesitate to give mc a call. ARy telepbone number is: (206) 587-5634. In my absence, you should
also feel free to contact my assistant,.Lura I-Iacrison, at (206) 254-5373.
I look forward to work.ing with }rou on chis project.
Sineerel }~ours,
Rodney . ~Iendt
Executive Director
cc: D. LaPaul .
\ i
~ RESOLUTION NO -
A RESOLU"TION OF THE SPORANE VALLEY CITY COUNTCIL APPROVIlNG THE
ACTIONT OF THE STATE OF WASH1NGT0N ECONO1vIIC DEVELOPMENT FINANCE
AUTHORjTY ANrD TBE ISSUANCE OF NON-RECOURSE R:EVENUE BONDS TO
FNANCE AN ECOrsOMIC DEVELOPNT.ENT FACII.ITY FOR VJASTE MANTAGEMEiNT,
Ta\jC. ("the COMPANY"); AND PROVI77DIG FOR QTHER MATTERS PROPERLY
IZELATING TBERETO.
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2008, the VVashinJton Economic Development k'inance
Authonty ("WEDFA") had presentad to it Resolution No. `V-2008-02 (the "Resolution"), a copy
of which is attachetl hereto as Exhibit A, relating to tlie issuance of non-recourse revenue bonds
wherein tbe procecds of which would be loaned to the Company for inter alia the purchase of
collection velucles, containcrs, and land within currently permitted acreage, located in the City of
Spokane Valley at 11720 First Avenue East (the "Project"), a11 as authorizeti by the Economic
Development Finance Authoriry Act of 1989, R.C.W. Title 43, Chapter 163, as amended (the
°Act"); and
WHEREAS, on January 29, 2008; N'V`EDFA unanimously approved the Resfllution; and
~ WHEREAS, it is the policy of the Washington Economic -Development Finance Authority
not to issuc revenue bonds cxcept upon ihe approval of the county, city or town within whose '
plauning,juaisdiction the proposed industrial development facility lies; and
IVHEREAS, the Project lies within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washin;ton; '
NO`V, TIIEREFORE, 1T IS HEREBY FOUiND, IaETERM'iNED AND 0R17ERED as
follows:
e.ction 1: The Spokane Valley City Council (the "Council"); pursuant to the request of the
Washington Econonvc Developmcnt Finance Authority, does hereby approve the issuance of non-recourse revenue bonds (the "Bonds") by the «ashington Economic Development Finance
Authority, for the purposes pro-,rided in the Act.
Scction 2: The Bonds shall be issued in the aggegate pruicipal sum of not to exceed
530,00000 pursuant to a Resolution of WEDFA. The proceeds of the Bonds are to be lent to
the Company; pursuant to a loan agreement or other appropriate financing agreement; and useti
for the purpose of inter ali.a cov.structing and cquipping the Project; including -the necessary
appurtenanccs, located within the boundaries of the City of Spokanc Valley and to pay certain
costs of issuarice of the Bonds.
~ •
Section 3: The Bonds shall not constitute an obligation of the State of Washuieton or of the City of Spokazie Valley, and no tax funds or revenues of the State of Waslungton or of the
City of Spokane-Valley shall be used to pay the principal'or interest on the Bonds. Nlcither the
faith and credit nor any taxing po«<er of the State of Washington or of the City of Spokane Va11ey
shall be pledgcd to pay the pri.ncipal or interest on the Bonds.
Section 4: T"he Spokane Valley City Council hereby approves the issuance of Bonds by
WE-DFA for the purpose o.f financing the Project as described herein, a qualified project under
the Act. However, such approval shaA not waive any of the permitting requirements
applicable to this Project, nor in any. way modify. the City of Spokane Valley's
go~~ernmental authority with respect to the Project
Section 5: This Resolution is intended to constitute approval of the issuance of revenue
bonds cvithin the meaning of the policy of the Washington Economic Development Finance
Authority. . Section 6: Upon passage aud approval of this Resolution, it shall take effect immediately.
I7ATED ttus day of ' , 2005. .
AYES :
NOES: ABSEiNT:
ABSTA1NTNG: .
sPOKANE vAx.LF-v ciTY coul•TCa.
sy: . .
Chair
.ATTEST:
Title: .
C17Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY
O ' Request for Council Ac#ion Meeting Date: 510612008 C ity Manager S ign-off~ ~
Item: Check a!I th3t apply' ❑ cansent 0 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ iriformation [E adrnin. repart ❑ pending legislatian
AGEAIDA ITEM TITLE: Strategic Planning Exercise: Council Six-Year Transporta#ion
CoaE Setting .
GOVERNIhlG LEGISLATION: IVone .
PREVIOUS COUNCI L ACTfOhl TAKEN: At the request af the Finance Committee, the Council 'undertook a 7ransporkation Financial SWOT Analysis on April 29, 2008 as a precursor to
deterrn€ning multiyear transportation goals_
BACKGROUND: Council has establEShed the goal of adopting a s#rategic firrancial plan in
- 2008. Periodic reviews af the City's six-year financial forecest indicate ongoing funding I
shortfalls wi#hin the Street Fund th at is relied upon to pay far basic street mainterrance servic,es_
The Finance Cornrnittee believes that the Council must focus on creating the means ta '
~ main#ain, preserve and improve the local transporta#ion system,
OPTiONS: Engage or not engege in a six-yea r transporkation goa ! setting exercise_
' RECQMMEN DED ACTlOhl OR MOTlOhl: CVone at thistirne.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL 1MpACTS; Impact unknovvn at this time,
STAFF CONTACT; Dave Mercier
ATTACHMENTS April 29, 2008 S1NDTAnalysis results.
City Council TransPortation F'inancial SWUT Analysis (with staff input adcled*)
Aprii 29, 2008
~-1
Obicctive: `Co provide residents and businesses with a physically Fuld financially sound local
transportation (sireet) system dhat meets their needs no,%v and in dhe future.
# VOTES: STR.ENGTIIS:
6 Good current conditions
6 Lack of congestion _
6 We have a plan (strect master plan and TII')
4 Good access to business
3 Safe streets
2 Excellent contractors-street maintenancc
2 Couplet
2 Exccllent commuter system (I-90)
1 Strong eastlwest system
I C lean ,
1 Some excellent bike lanes
1 Goocl street sigils .
0 Reasonable grid system
0 rxcellent staffand council
~ 0 Good coiinectivity to freeway .
0 Good sight distance
Reputation fnr lona range fiscal planning a►ld no previous tax increases
VQTES WEA[OTSSES
7 Lack of public perception funding need
6 I.ack of sustainable public funding
. 6 I.,ack of funding for maintenance, streee preservations, new development
5 Today's good conditions mask tomorrow's (future) neetls
4 failing intersections .
4 Older roads in growth areas
1 Inadequate emergency acce,ss
l Public dotisn'C understand crumbling roads (deterioration)
l Premature deterioratinn
1 . Poor north/s4uth connectors (couplet)
' 1 Business roads not aesthetically pleasing
L Iaead-end Appleway
'0 Miles of road without curb
0 Lack of continuity of design 0 Was noC a cohesivc comprehensi<<c street plan
0 Inadequate roads in PUD, cul-de-sacs
0 Sprague east of University
H:lcbainbridgelMinuteslSWOT eesults with Staff Input re 4-29-08 study session.doc
i
Q Dishman4Mica
0 Nat adequate for truck traff-ic
~ 0 Laclc af resources to independently identify traffic situ$tions an a routEne basis
. ,
p At grade nilroad crassings
p Need to defer stri~et maintenance a,nd preserva#ion
~ Lack of suff.icient bike lanu
* Lack of sutficient mass trdnsit {]ight-rai3; etc.)
Many roads in bad condi#ion, ruts in road (Sprague), road slioulders brealcing away
* Incorporation concept that exisCing revenue struuture was adequate
* Allowuig the streets ta deteriorate to an uflsafe c~ondition
* Lack af resources for plartning and grant applications
* A1lowing thc streets #o deterioratc #.o aii unsafe conditioii
* J..ack of resaurces for pianning and g!'aiit applicxYiorl9
* Premekure de#enorxtion of newer s#reets
* We have a master pSau but still a draft_ Also, needs to bc snpplemen#ed wilh reader
friendiy infarmation for #he public%
VOTES OPPOYtTLTl\'TTTCs
7 Work with qtate legislature to develap new toolslfunding
6 Ta establish an ongoing funding source
4 To +m plement lhc street master plan .
4 Transp o rtat ion 13eneFit District, T.I'D; '1 axes: salcs, utiEity, real estate. B&,0, property, . , ~
i
3 To develop uii i que cityJprivatc projects .
2 To maintain at a lower cost then it' we were in dire straights
? To develop extensive trail 5yskein . ,
2 Success in gaininglleverage grant aollars I
l 1'ress forward with bridging the valley 1 To wor€e with otli er ageiticies to dcve lap tiniqua transportation sys#eiii
l Develop systei-o thaY is cnvirannientally ffiendly
0 Op[ions for bikeJpedcstrian 13igh public awareness - * poteii#ial supporicrs
* To gain support for op#imal iiiaintenance vs. needing to repair our streets,
* To demonsti`ate lang term savings assocsated with maintenaice
* Ta provide safe and well maintained stree#s
# Review ex.istii3c, revenues that could be dadicated Co t}7e Street Fund
* We are a developing C itY, Presents unique opportunit7es. .
* OPPortuntty to acquire go.od tri$s5 teansit sysiem (I iglit rail, etc,) _
i
FI:lcbainbridgolMinuteslS WOT results with Staff Inp ut re 4-29-D8 study session,doc
VU1'ES TWRCATS T'a'ENI5 CO(TNCIL CAN INFL,iTENCF
6 Negative reaction to spending dollars
~ 6 Cutting services J
~
5 Road deterioration
4 Council inaction
3 Public inaction/complaeency
2 Increase in demand for maintenance
2 Inadequate communication with public ~
1 Asking for more money ~
1 Adverse affect An economic growth
1 Reduced eurrent funding
I Policy inconsistency ~
1 Gradualism ~
0 Laek of concurrency ~f
0 Being "out front" in Spokane Valley
0 Under-estimating public reaction to neecl ~
# Compecino with other entities for public dollars
~ incraases in accidents resulting from inadequate mziintenance
* Higher financial risk to the City resulting from inadequate maintenance
* Reduction in StatelFederal grant fimding
o .
LEG I?N D
staff input
threats managcahle by City Council
. JH:lcbainUrideelNiinuteslSWOT eesults with Statf Input re 4-29-08 study session.doc
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of April 30, 2008; 4:45 p.m.
Plea-se note this is a work in pmgress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
Mav 13 2008, ReQUlar A'Ieedng, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, May S)
Proclamation: Ntuy as Older Americans Month
1. Consent Agenda: Claims,Minutes, Payroll, Recreation/Conservation Grant Resolution (Greenacres),
24 Ave Sewer Line Utility Agreement; STA Cooperative Sprague & Bowdish [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 08-009 Amending 2008 Budget - Ken Thompson [5 minutes]
3. Proposed Resolution Amending 2008 TIP - Steve Worley [10 minutes]
4. Proposed Resolution Approving Issuance of Revenue Bonds for Waste Management, Inc - Dave Mercier [5 minj
5. Proposed Resolution Changing Mirabcau Parkway Speed Limits - Neil Kersten [10 minutes]
6. Motion Consideration: Barker Road Bridge Bid Award - Steve Worley [5 minutes]
7. Motion Consideration: 24`h Avenue Bid Award - Neil Kersten [5 minutes]
8. Motion Consideration: Coop.Agrmt CDBG & Home Investment Partnership Funds - G. McCormick [15 minj
9. Motion Consideration: Universal Park Contract for Arehitectural Services - Mike Stone [10 minutes]
10. Motion Consideration: Greenacres Area Wide Rezone (UDC Lot Size) [120 minutes]
11. Information Only: (a) Potential Electric Billboards; (b) Animal Control Update
EXECUTIVE SESSION• [*estimated meeting: 190 m_~
Mav 20, 2008, Studv Session 6:00 p.m. (due date Monday, May 121
l. Action Item: Eirst Reading Proposcd Ordinance for Street Vacation - Kathy McClung (10 minutes)
2. Fireman's Fraternal Association (15 minutes)
3. "Smart Routes" - Lunell Haught (15 minutes)
4. Webcasting - Greg Bingaman (20 minutes)
5. Storm Drainage Easement - Cary Driskell (10 minutes)
6. Transportation Financial Gap Analysis: Financial Options & Facts - Dave Mercicr (60 minutes)
7. Info only: Department Reports
8. Advance Agenda, Council Check-In, City Manager Chcck-in (]0 minutes)
TOTAL MINUTES: 140 minutes
Mav 27, 2008 (irn meeling, :lfemorial Uny)
June 3. 2008, Studv Session 6:00 p.m. [due date Tuesday, May 27]
1. Action Item: Second Reading Proposcd Ordinance for Street Vacation - Kathy McClung (10 minutes)
2. Comp Ylan Amendments Discussion - Greg McCormick (30 minutes)
3. Argonne and Indiana Road Discussion -Neil Kersten (15 minutes)
4. Customer Service Improvement Plans/Perrnit Process (CIP of PV1) - Steve Worley /Neil Kersten (20 minutes)
5. Info Only: Pines/Mansfield Contract Award - Steve Worley
6. Advance Agenda, Council Check-In, City Manager Check-in (10 minutes)
TOTAL A'IINUTFS: 85 minutes
June 10, 2008. Regular Meeting. 6:00 a.m. [due date Monday, June ZJ
1. PUBLIC HEAItIVG: 2009-2014 TIP [15 minutes]
2. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes, Storm Drarnage Easement (T) [S minutesJ
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan - Greg McCormick [15 minutes]
4. Proposed Resolution Delegating Signature Authority for Utility MOU - Mike Jackson [10 minutes]
5. Motion Consideration: Pines/Mansfield Contract Award - Steve Worley [5 minutes]
F.XFCUTIVE SESSION [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 4130/2008 4:51:11 PM Page 1 of 3
Saturday. June 14: 9 a.m. lo approx 3 p.m. CounciVStaff Retreat (Uick llenent►v's Cabin)[due N1on, .lune 21
Terttative Topics:
I) Updated Financial Forecast (4) Shoreline MasterProgram (7) On-line perniitting
2} 2009 Council Goals (S) City Center Initiative (8) brainstorming
3) Transportation Funding (6) Law Enfarcement Serviccs
.Iune 17. 2008: No Meeting or Studv Session (June 17 - 20, AWC Annual Conference - Yakima)
June 24, 2008, ReQular 1'[ecting, 6:00 n.m. [due date ti'Ionday, June 161
1. Consent Agcnda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Comp Plan - Greg McCormick 120 minutes]
3. Propased Resolution Adopting 2009-201 4 TIP - Steve Worley [15 minutes]
4. Motion Consideration: Sales !'urchase Agreement Mike Connelly/Scott Kuhta [IS minutes]
5. Info Only: Dcpt Reports
EXECliTIN-'E: SESSION [*estimated mceting: 5-5 iiiinutesl
,lulv 1, 2008, Studv Scssion 6:00 p.m. [duc datc Nlonda}', .Juiie 23 )
,lulv 8 2008, ReQular Mectinj!, G:OU p.m. [due date hionday, .Iune 301
1. C'c~nscnt Agcnda: ( lairns, Paymll, `tinute; [5 minutes]
.JuIY 1.5, 2008, Studv Sessinn 6:00 n.m. [(fue date Monday, Julv ?J
l. Comp !'lan Amendment Quarterly Update - Greg McCoRnick (20 minutes )
2. Strategic Financial Plan - Dave Mercicr (60 minutes )
3. Street hlasterPlan i!pdate -Neil Kersten (30 minutes)
TOTAL 1'IIN[JTF,S: 110 minutes
.iulv 22, 2008, ReQular 'vieetine, 6:00 p.m. [due date A'Ionday, July 141
1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Yayrull, `~linutes (5 minutes]
info Only: Dept Reports (*estimated meeting: minutes]
.lulv 29,2008, titueiv tiessiun 6:110 p.m. (d« e dale Monday, July 21 1
AuQust 5, 2008. 1o MeetinQ (pre.ctmred Ncilinna! :\'rgl1t Out)
Aup-ust 12, 2008, Rep-ular Meetine, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, August 41
1. Consent Agenda: Glaims, Payroll, Minutes [5 minutes]
2. lnfo Only: nept Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes]
Pri~iiciryElectiai Au~~1s't 79
Draft Advance Agenda 413012008 4:51:1 1 Ph1 Page 2 uf 3
Aueust 19. 2008. Studv Session 6:00 a.m. [due datc Monclay, August 11~
1. Sprague Appleway Revitalization Plan (SARI') Discussion - Scott Kuhta (60 minutes)
2. Street Design Standards - Neil Kersten (60 minutes)
AuQust 26, 2008, Rep-ular Meetine, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, August 181
1. 1'[,BLIC i[H:ARING: SARP - Scott Kuhta [60 minutes]
5 minutes
Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, Minutes [
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Adopting SARP - Scott Kuhta [20 minutes]
4. Info Only: Dept Reports [*estimated meeting: 95 minutes]
Sent 2, 2008 (tro meeting, l.a6or DqY)
September 9, 2008, Rceular Ni'Icctine, 6:00 p.m. [due date Monday, Sept 1 ]
1. Consent Agenda: Claims, Payroll, N4inutes [5 minutes]
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinanee Adopting SARP - Scott Kuhta [20 minutes]
3. Admin Rcport: Airport Overlay 7one - Mikc Connelly/Kathy McClung [20 minutes]
[*estimated meeting: 45 minutes]
OTIiER PENDING AND/nR UPCON'IING ISSUFS/MEETINGS:
Aquifer Protection/Water Conservation (Post Falls, Spokane)
City Center Report to Council
Gode Compliance Amendments (UDC)
Comp Plan Amend-Qrtrly Update ( Oct, 1an, April, July)
Comp Plan Update/[1GA/JPA
East Gateway Monument Structurc
General Election November 4
Graffiti Update
Impact Fee Reyuest Central Valley School District
IT Specialist Classification Rcsolution
Joint Meeting w/City of Spokane
Law Enforcement Analysis
I.aw Enforcement Contract
Library Hoard Update
NLC Meeting Nov I I-15, Orlando, Flarida
Northeast Housing Solutions City Membership
Overweight/over size vehicle ordinance
Public heariog for State Performance Audit Report re Public Records (w/in 30 clays of final report release)
Records Management Contract/Update
Transportation Impacts
Use Agreement (Cary Driskell)
'Trsinsportation Beoefit District (TBD) (JunelJuly)
a. F.stablis6 ordinance; (b) set public heariug; (c) draft resolution; (d) ballot language
voes ni~t include tirne far public comments.]
Draft Advance Agenda 4/302008 4:51:11 PM Pagc 3 of 3
Public Works Department
SC17Yokane Capital Improvement Program
,;o*Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
lnf'ormational Memo
To: David Mercier, Mlke Jackson, City Council .
From: Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Ken Knutson, Project Manager j
Date: April 28, 2008
Re: Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project - Bid Award
The Barker Road Bridge Replacement Project was advertised for bids on Friday, . April 18. The scheduled bid opening date is Friday, May 9.
After openinD bids anci tabulating the results, staf~' ,vrill be requesting Council at their
May 13 meetin~ to award the Barker Road Bridge Replacement contract to the lo~~~est
O responsible bidder. .
This project is funded by a federal bridge replacement grant up to $9.985 million.
Please feel free to contact me if yrou havc any questions. ~
SpC3TVOFka0001111100~
ne
;OO*Valley `
11707 E Sprague Ave Suice 106 ♦ Spokane Valley VIA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallQsQokanevalley.org
Memorandum To: David Mercier, Mike Jackson, City Councll
From: Nell Kersten, Publlc Works Director
4f6,;As-- Craig Aldworth, CIP Engineer, Project Manager
Date: April 28, 2008
Re: 24'" Ave. Reconstruction Project - Bid Award
The 24th Avenue Reconstruction Project was advertised for bids on Friday, April 25th. The scheduled bid opening date is Friday, May 9th.
After opening bids and tabulating the results, staff will be requesting Council at
their Tuesday, May 13th meeting to award the 24th Avenue Reconstruction
Project contract to the lowest responsible bidder. -
~
This project is 1009b City funded.
Please contact Craig Aldworth, CIP Engineer, if you have any questions
concerning this project.