2008, 06-24 Regular Meeting
AGF.Nt}A
tiYUtiAYT; VAI,LCY C1TY COUNCTL
REGUL.AR
Couocil 1►tceting #139
Tuesduy, Jitnt 24. 2008 6:04 p.m.
Spokanc Valicy City Ha11 Cnuncil Chumbers
11707 E Sprague Avrnuc
CuuariJ Reqaesfy Plrust SIlr-nce Yuur CcU Phonts During Counrll Merting
CAI.I.7'O OltUER:
iVY(K'ATION: Pasiur Atntiucl Chnnit)g, F.,untain 11in►,trics
FLEDGF nR AI.I.EG[ANCE:
ROLL CALL:
4f'PROVAI. UF AGFN'DA:
ttil'R()DI iCTi(.)ti OF SE'ECIAL GUFSTS .4ND PftFSENTATIUNS:
cUythitTTFE, BOaRiI. LIAlSUN SU11?11ARY RFPOR7's:
MAYOR'S REE'OItT:
P[.iB1,iC CUMME1V'I'S: This is :ui uppununity 1'ur dic public lo spr-ak on any suhjcct nut vit tlic agenda
for uctic-n. Whcn you coroc to ttte }xxlium, plcasc itatr your nitmc ind addrcss I'cir thr reccxd :tnd limit
rrmark+ I,) 2I1fCC (lli(lUti--S.
1. COtiSErT:1(:EN'DA: Cvnsi~-,t5 oCitrms considcrrd routfne w~ttich nre uppru%rJ a.roup :l
CouncilmumEx:r cuay rrmave an itr:m fram thc Ciinscnt 11gencin to bc cQnsidurcd srpnratcl~ .
A>>pra%nl of M~~ting.Minutes ot June 3, 2008 Ctxinci) Mreting Study Srssion
h. :1ppmvn1 t-f h1re:ting k1iriuteti nf .►urte 10, ?(}U$ Cuiinci) Srrcinl tilreting, Fxecuti%-e Sc-sisic►n
c. Aprn,•il of of]une 10. 2009. Reuul:u (':,:incil Mectiri`*:
N1:W BUS[N'FSS:
Fic-,t 2tc:►dirag Pr;,pxosrd C)niinunco 0$-01! Amcnding ('ump 1'lan "t'cxt and vlap- Grcg 11ct'ormick
(putftic cnmmhat)
First Rr:sding PmpoSr+d C?rdinancc 09-012 Amending Comp Plun: 7.cming Ntnp - t rrec hicConnirk
f puhlic cnmmenti
-i. 1'ruposcd Kcsalution I]8-0la Adopting 2009 -2Ola T!P - Stcve Wuriey (pnLlir cuwrticutJ
Mutian Considcration: NincsThlansfield Contrart Awurci - Strvc Wurlcy I public rvwment1
6. Motion Consickration: Auth.}riznti.mn tci Suhrnit Jul}' 1 Au(lit RPt to) St-ltr anditorti i'hri,~ Ii3inhr:lec
(public coenmrnti
YUt3Llt' Ct.)NtMENi t'S T1►i3 is un uppartunity for thc public tospcak on Wlti yut,.jcct nt-t kin thc sgrncln
toc aLUoa. Wt1ei1 YpU Co[IlC to thc pudiwii, pIC;LSC SISIe 1tVlr f111li1C xrjd :►d{Irrsy t-4jr thc.-ccord xn(l limit
r:.rn.uk:; ta thrrc minutr~.
Ail'_1IIhL5TR.1TIVF. RF.FORTS:
i Arrnnrdn 11l'illis and GGL(), C'itv Il;sll ProE:ram IteFmrt - Vcil Krrwtrn
INFORMATI(lN ONLY:
8. City Hall Sitc I'lunning Cvntruct - Ncil Kcrstcn
9. Spokqnt Rcgional Solid Wasie Audit - Neil Kersten
I [.ettet of SuPparT
11. Depattmcnt Reports
ILlECl3'TIYE SESSiI)V: I.amd A,~yuisitiOn
%Il,101'R1''4iFN1'
FU7Z%RE SCNF_11G'!.F
Regalar Council iterlitigs arc grRerally lield 2ad anJe Tuc►dojs, bc•inning ut 6:00 p.ML
('ouncll Slurls' 5eA A iWiA ure;;emru!!s' heic! I". ;•d cund Sth Tur.sdar.}. bt~qinning ut h:lM p_nr.
N17T1i i' ittdivtdualS plwmmg W atteed tFie mccting w}w rcquirc special asaistance to eecanunodste ptiysical, haaing, cn othrr
I ~n~pairmc~t~. ~les:c contr:.;~ thr ('rnt'~cri; zt 1Sf~ol g: I-l~Nni ~nn~ Pnt~~hlc Ihnt ;rmngcrrcni : m«• he m:rdc
~'~~u:~:il 1<_i~,~_i !k._~~~.iiR!?:;•.d.ultrctir~ P_.,c'u1 ~
- DRAFT
~ i11Ii\`iJT'ES
C.ITY OF SPOKAiVF, VAIJLEY
CITY COU17ClFL STiTDY SESSTO\T
' Tuesclay, June 3, 2008
1'resent:
Councilmembers: St-iff:
Rich lvfunson, Mayor iMike Jacl:son, City Manager
Dick Denenny, Deputy Mayor Mike Counelly, City Attomey _
Rose Dempsey, Cauacilmember Greg McCormick, Planning Manager
Bill Gothmana, Councilmember iMike Stnne, Parks and Recreation Director
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Steve Worley, Scnior Engineer
Diatia Wilhite, Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner
- Cary Driskcll, Deputy City Attomey
Absent: Micki Hamois, Associate Planner
Sceve 1 aylor, Councilmember Tavis Schmidt, Assistant Planner
Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner
Inga Note; Senior Engineer, Traffic _
Bill Ivliller, lr' Specialist Carolbellc F3ranch,1'ublic InformaCion Officer
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
Mayor viunson called the meetino to order at 6:00 p.m. and welcomed everyone lo the meeting
~ Einplovee introductions: Deputy Cil'y Attomey Driskell i.ntrociuced new legal intems Dena Burke and
Brian Holleran; f'ollowed by )7eputy City Manaaer vlike Jackson introducing new Human Resources
iVlanager John NVtiitehead. Council greeted and welcomed the new employecs.
Roll Call: At Alayor A/funson's request, City CIerk Bainbridge callecl roll; all Couneilmembers were
present except Councilmember Taylor. It was nroved by Depiity iVayor Derzerzny, seconded, arid
ununiniaiislyagr2ed t4 excuse CauncilmernGer .Taylorfrom tonight's meeting.
ACTTUN I'TFMS:
1. Secqnd .Readin g 1'ronosed Qrdinanee 08-010, STV 01-07 Street Vacation - ICaren 1Cendal I After City Clerk BainbridDe reacf the ordinance title, it ivas nrovetl by Coujrcrbtrember lyillrite and
seconded to approve artlinance 08-010. Assistant Plaruier ICendall explained the changes since the first
relding, tliat the paraa aph regarding thc fees was an oversight; that there would be no compensa.tion
necessary as they are vacating and rededicating the street; and that there are also sotne scrivener's errors
as noted. After going through the PowerPoint; there was brief council diseussion concerning uCility
placement and Ms. Kendall mentioned that the urility cornpan.ies have asked for 3n easement as it is not
necessary to relocate utilities. Mayor iVlunson invitcd public commetit; no commeclts were offered. Yote
by Acclamation: Irt Fmor: tlnunimoats. Opposed.• Norte. Ab.stentiorts: None. Mofion ccrrried.
NTayor Munson then inAted genera] public cornments; no cocnments were offered.
2. Proposeci Resolution 08-011 Non-Recourse Revenue Bonds - Mike .Iackson _
It tivus nioved by Cotcncilnieniber ZT%ilhite anrisecorrded, to approve fresolulion 08-0.11 approving isstiunce
by the Industrial Development Corporatian of Spokane tiPashington of its non-recourse revenue bontls.
• Deputy City Manager Jackson explained t}iat this resolution was submitted to us by Koegen Edwards, and is similar to tfiose Couneil received in the past concerning economic development revenue bonds, and as
in those past instances, this resolul'ion attaehes no city liability to the finaneing; and he addccl that tirne is
a factor as these bonds are scheduled for ftnaii-r.ation June 16 and after Council review, they must be
Study Session iMecting Minutes: 06-03-08 , Page ! of S .
Approvecl by Council: ,
D.RAFT
submitted to the County for their approval of a resolution as well. Mayor Munson invited public '
comments; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favar: Unanimous. Opposed.• A'one. ~Abslentiorts: None. Motron carrietl.
3. Nlotion Cansideration: Consultant Selection Citv Center ETS - Greg MeCorrnick
It was mnved by Councibnember Wil6rrte rnid seconded, to authorize the cily staff to enter in1o contruct
rregotialions tivith Berger/Ahcnn-J:D. White for the City Center environmental impact stalement/planrred
action ordinance project, arid uuthprize the Ci1y Manager ar• tlesignee to sia i the fnul contract. Planning
NianaaEr McCormick explained thai staff issued a request for qualifications last Jaiuary for firms to
prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) and planned action ordinance for che City Center; that a
response was receive(l f.rom Ferteet, Inc., ESA AdolFson, and Berger/Abam, and that after interviews and
reference checks performed, staff recommends Berger as the top finn for the project. Mayor Nfunson
invited public comment; no comments were offered. It was also mentioned that the draft scope of wor1: is
within the budget. tiate by Acclamatiun: Jn Fcrvor: Ufianimott.r. Upposed: Nvne. .Ahsteritions: Norre.
Alotion carried.
4. Motion ConsideraGion: Barker Road ]3ridp~e Bid Award - Steve `Va•lex
It wczs rnoved by.Deputy jVfayar Denenrry and secontled, to cnvard the Burlcer Road $ridge replaeentent
project contract to 1Vlorgen c4c Oswood Canstruetiort Cn., 1i1c., in the umoxrrtt of $9,449,354.75. Engineer
Worley cxplained that thre:e bids were receivcd for this project; a.ttd the bid from Morgen & Oswood was
the lnw biddEr; that the packet contains a copy of the bid tabulations, with schedule A as the briclge
rcplacement, B as the utility work which is to be reimbursed to the City, C is for the separate trafFic
relatecl issues; and Seheclulc C Altemates (C1, C2 and C3) rire for the bridge arrivork previously
authorized by Council, in an amount tiot to exceecl $74,000. vle. \klorley stated that the bids for the
-
arttivo.rk exceeded that $74,000 approved cap, lhat the bids were higher dhan originally anCicipated and :
even with the fcderal grant af up to $9.955 millian, there will be a$1.266 mil.lion shortfall; but that we -
can cover the shortfall with revenues we curre»tly have; iincl that staff recommends moving the bid
forward. Nlr. Worley also explained that public worl:s received a protest frnm the second loNvest bidder,
which was reviewed by Public Works and by Legal and that company was noti:fied that the protest w3s
decermined to be without mcrit.
Discussion followed conceming the ar[worlc and the timing involved, ancl the yuestinn arose of 'when the
contractor wrould need to laiow any dceision on whether tv incprporate any of the artwork. Mr. Worley '
explaincd that to give the City the best price on everything, st3ffseleceeci the low bidder based on the sum
of all schcdules, that we could award the entire scheciule and prepare change orders aften-vards if that is
the direction Council desires. Il was deterniined to proeced widi the entire bid award as statcd but to
impose a 90-day window, and that Council will re-visit this issue prior io the expiration of that 90-clays.
Ulr. 1'Jorley said staff will bring t}iis to council wi[h.in the stated time frame, for ctiseussion on whether to
rerTiove C l, C2, ancl/or C3 within the next niiiety days. Mayor Munson itivited puUlic comment. Grcg
Oslvo4d of Morgen and Oswood thanked Council and staff for th.is opportunity, and said that the 90-tlay
time frame will be nlore than sufFicient. Vote by Acclamutiai: In Fcrvor.• Ururnimous. Opposerl: None.
Absterxtiar:s: None. Motioyi carrietl.
5. viavoral Apnoinhnents - JMayor Mttnson Mayor Munson reparted that Councilcncmber'Caylor has accepted a new full-time po"sition an(l becausc of
his I:ravel schedule and clemands associated with tllat new position, he has asked to bc relieved from
. cotn.mittee assignments uutil he gets a better idea of his time commitments, and thAt Mayor Nlunson
siated the reassignments as follows: Ma}'ar vlunson to the Chamber of Commerce Board; Deputy Mayor
Denenny to the Finance Conimittee and Spok3ne County Solid \Vaste Advisory Committce,
Councilrnember [7empsey to the Spokane Regional Clean Air Agency, and Councilmember Gothmann to ~
the Lodoing '1"ax Advisory Committee and Spakane County Affordable Housing Task Force. It )vas
Study Session Mceting Liinutes: 06-03-03 1'age 2 of 5
Approvcd by Council:
- D.RAFT
~ moved by Deputy Mayor Denenny crnd seconded to confirm the jusl-stated apPointments. Mayor Munson
invited publie comment; no comments were offered. Yote by Acclamatiorz: In Favor: Unanimous.
Opposed.• None. Abstentions: 1\rone. Motion carried.
Mayor 1V[unson agaiu invited general puUlic comments; no commcuts were offered. Mayor lvlunson
callcd for a short recess at 6:31 p.m., ancl reeonvened the meeting at 6:41 p.m., at which point Mayor
Munson also explai.ned that Cnuncil would not Ue having an Exeeut•ive Session tonight.
RFC_'TTTLA12 ST(Tl)Y SESSIb\` I7'EA'IS:
6. Valley I4ospital Process iJpdate - Ron Mc1Cav and Judv Cole
Mayor Munson welcomed .Ron McKay and Vlike Taylor, Board vlcmbers of Empire Health Services
(EHS). NIr. McTCay thanked Council for the opportimity to speak about the pending transactions
conceming Deaconess IvTedical Center and Valley Hospiutl, and went through }ais PowerPoint explaining
the recent organizational history of EHS and the severe financial and operational challenges facctl
recently. The presentation also mentioned some of the criteria for a partncr and which of tliose criteeions
have been fulfilled by Community I•lealth System, whieh included hiring all EWS cmployees aC the time
of close., and honoring their rate of pay and seniority level. At the completion of the presentation, Mr.
M.cKay asked for either a resolution or letter of support, antl there was Council consensus that Couneil
would send such a letter.
7. Argonne and Indiana tlvenue - Neil Kersten/1nga ~jote
Public Works Director KersCen stai;ed that the Valley Pol.ice PrE;cinct norified the Public Works
Depariment of recent collisions at die Jndiana/Argonne intersection; that the Washington State
Deparhnent of Transportalion (WS]70I~ datavase shows 35 reported collisions from January 2003
~ through December 2007, ancl of [hose, hwenty were behween the norGhbound left-turn movement and the
southbound tlirough rnovement; and that during the peal: houis, tlie southbound traffic tends to back up
from the I-90 interchange signal and block the intersection with lndiana, fuld that cars in the inside two
lanes will ofren stop short leaving a gap Por northbound left turns to cross Argonne; but that the curU lane
is usually firee flowing so drivers can cross the hvo insidc lanes, which they do but when they do, they
can't see the moving car i.n the curb lane, resulting in a collision with speeds sometimes beriween 30 and
35 m.iles per hour; and that while other areas might generate more accidents, accidents in this area aee as a
direct result of a funcCional problem, and ihat sta _ff. ictentifies such areas of conecrn for possible
eonsideraUon of how to rectify the situation or minimize some v# the accidents, and that this is the
number one interseceion identified by the police deparlment. PAlice 17epartment Sgt. Mike ZolJers
concurred with Mr. Kersten's assessment, and said ehal one recommendation is to close the northbound to
westbound hu-ii lane, bul that wquld liavc an impact to the school and others; and mentioned t}ia[ the
foriner Tidyman's builcling will soon be occupied by a church, which will create greater evening and
weekend traffic; zinci it was menrioned that another sugbestion «rould be to alter the timing of Argontie
and Knor. rurther ciisLUSSion included mention of cliffculty for h•affic to enter Marie Calendars; of directing or
having traffic diverted to go io rlrgonne and Knoa and inakc a U-eum; and that such a detour is estimated
to be less lhan one-quarter mile, mention of placing signs for limited turns during certain pc,ak traffic
liours; further mentian that such signs are likely to not be well-respected by drivers without high levels of
enforcement; of the need to notify those affected businesses if changes would affect their clientele; of the
speculatian of how long it would take for traYFic to take ttie mentioned detour and U-turn; mention of
directional signs; various lightuig systems or blinking ambee or red lights; and of the neecl to alert traffic
to the existence of Hutchinson Road. There was Council consensus thac staff research these issues,
ineluding discussioa witlt busincss o«mers, and Mr. Kersten mentioned that the signs could be
~ implcmented first followed by monitoring of the intersection to see if the problem was being alleviated, or
at least reduced. -
Study Session Meeting Kinutes; 06-03-08 ' PEge 3 of 5
Annroved bv Council: •
DKAFT
,
R. Solid Waste Franchise Update - Carv Driskcll j
Deputy City ACtorney Driskell gave a brief update by explaining that Council rccently participated in a
transportation finaricial SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity and Threat) analysis, a six-year goal
setting exercise and analysis and one of the options mentioned dealt with solid wasCe contractino options,
and he stated that staff seeks direcrion on whether ta open exploration discussions with Sunsliine vid
VVaste Management regarding ncw franchises, and if tllose discussions are authorized, some of the issues
addresscd could include rates, mandatory pickup, enhanecd recycling, franchise fees, and hours of
colJection. Deputy Mayor 17enenny noted that the R.equest for Council Act:ion indicated a recommended
action to place a motion on the next consent agenda, and he questioned the need for such motion, stating
he sees no probletn in beQ nning the conversation, stressing that this would not be a negotiation or re-
negotiation, but merely discussion; which discussion Mayor N1tmson adcled eould include pros and cons
on using this as a revenue source and any affect sueh might have; and stated that tlaose iterns listed above
by iVlr. Driskell are within those discussion parameters. There was Council consensu.s that no further
motinn wrould be neected, but that Council concurred for staff to proceed with exploratory discussions on
the mentioned topics.
vlayor Munson called for a recess at 7:46 p.m., and reconvcncd the meeting at 7:50 p.rn. _
. 9. Carnprehensivc Plan Ameiidinents - Greg McConniclJVfike Basin~ter .
Planning Manager vlcCormick explained that he ancl planncrs Mike Basingcr, Tavis Schmidt, and Micki
Harnois will be giving Counci.l an overview on the 2008 Comp Plan Draft Amendments based on the
Ylanning Commission's aricl staff's recommendations.
In explaining Camp Plan proposed cha»ges CPA Ol-OS through 03-08, Ms. I-Iarnois explained that die
only ctiange which received public testimony at the I'laruiing Commission hearinp was CPA 03-08, and
Chat proposal rec;eivecl several comments; and said that the Planning Commission reconunended all items "
for approval.
I1 ►vus mentioned tfrat Coisncil ivoadd like to receive irfarmutiun shuwing the 1'lanriirig Conxmissian's
disccrssion and halv they voted on euc61 proposal. Mcryor Muiason added t6iat 6re tivartted to recei-vw
documentution sho►ving how tlzese chrnage,s wilJ `I)ronrote the gerleral safety, health rnrd general welfare"
antl ha►v the 1'lunnirrg Comrnission can7e to each determinatiorl.
- Mr. McConnick explained that anything built in the proposed area, would have to meet the Building
Code regulalions and all ot:hcr state and municipal standards; and said that staff cannot give specific
inf'orniation prior to building development, but ance sCafT' knows what is proposed, they can dn specirc
review anc! Einalysis as part of the completion of any proposed project, and that many of tllese issues are
addressed during the planneci review level, and would not be addressed until ihcre is a proposetl project.
V1r. vlcCormick also explained that ralher lhan draw zoning lines on propeny lines, whieh is awkwarci
a.nd not agood break, that the preferred method is to use some physical feature to show breaks in zon.ing;
that staFf feels this CPA 03-09 change is appropriately delineated as it brings that line to a tnore dcfined
boundary using Marguerite rather then using a back properfy line; and that this proposal includes five
parcels and not just one piece. MAyAr M,unson questioned how decisions can be made without knowing
what will bc built as such would seem arbihraiy; and Mr. McCormick responded tlhat it doesn't appear to
be a substatrtial change in ccmditions, to which City Artorney Connelly added that this is not a site
specific regue,st, and that criteria is as set forth in the code for comprehensive plan changes, and that what
is built there is not one nf the criferia in the cade, but thal we can consider the Yypes nf uses allowed under
a zone change and by use of the matrix. Mayor Nlunson said he had additional questions and would
submit thosc to staff in writing. After a few more comrnents, City Attorney Connelly cautioaed Council
about not gefting into deliberation as we are not at that stage }°et, as tltis is a presentation, and c(eliberation
SEudy SessEon Meeting Minutes: 05-03-03 Page 4 of S
Appmved by Council:
D.Xlll~"'l
~ will ultimately occur, but tonight is to listen to the presentation and ask questions, and when such
ordinance is before Council, they will have ample time to express options.
Planner Schmidt then explained C.PA 04 through 06, said that the Planni.ng Commission recommencled
approval on 4 and 5, and that approval for Cl'A 06-08 is subject to approval for CPA 05-08; and said that
there were no commcnts on these proposals. Mr. Basinger theii revieNved CPA 07 and 08 and said that he
received an e-mail on CPA 08 from a neighbor Nvho was inleresled in what might be locaCeci there, to
which staff responded that there is no guarantee what will be there under the scheduled pemiitted uses,
but 3dded that he spoke with the applicant who indicated they were not planning a convenient store. Mr.
. McCormiek went over the various prAposed text amendments, many of which were minor updates; but
that proposed changes to Chapter 2 included the issue of potential annexation and what that means, along
with a new goal rtnd new map 2.2; tliat an iticonsistency was noted in policy 9.1 about having a variety of
housing allowed like aparUnents or condos, aid in the Elppendix 19t1 perm.ietecl use matri:c, t:hey wcre tiot
allowecl, ancl that staf_f felt it appropriate to update the appendix to allow those uses, which the Ylanning
Commission also recommended; and thaY there „rould be chan5es lo ChapEer 9 lo relleet the park property
in Greenacres. Mayor Munson reiterate.d his desiee to see how the planning Commission arrived at t.heir
recommendations. .
10. Information Only: (a) Pincs/Maiisfield Contrac•t Award; (b) Broadway Infraction Data; (c) City Hall
Final Program were inforination only items and were not discussetl or repor1;ed upon.
11. Advance AQenda - Mavor Munson
Deputy Mayor Denenny reminded Council as mentioned in the packet materials, to retain some of those
materials for upcoming meetin~;s. Councilrnember Wilhite asked to he excusecl from the next meeting.
~ 12. Council Check-in - Ma or vlunson - no fiir[her com.menCS. 13. Ci!y vlanager Check-i.n - Ivlike Jackson
Mr. 7ackson rnentioned he received an e-mail which iVlr. ►tilercier receivecl from our Lobbyist; and he will
circulate that for review.
~"94.4,~ c,ccrnN. T.,..d A....,.:s:+;.,., Rernoved from tlle agenda.
There beinc, no furthcr business, Mayor vlunson adjourned the meeting at 8:46 p.m.
A7 `l'k.S J': ' Richard M.unson, Mayor
Chriscine Bainbridge, Cily Clerk
~
Study Session Meeting h4inu' rs: 06-03-08 Pagc 5 of 5
Appravcd by Councik
NMTUTES
City of Spokane Vallcy
City Council Exccutive Session
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Atterrdance:
Cauncilmembers: Staff:
Rich Munson, vlayor Dave Mercier, City Matiager
Uick llencnny, Deputy Ivlayor Ul.ike Jackson; I7eputy City Manager
Rose T)empsey, COuncilmember Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Bill Gothmann, Councilmember Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Rich Ivlunson, Councilmember Scott Kuhta, Senior Planncr
-G`ary Schimmels, Cnuncilmember Cathy McCluno, Community llev. Dircctor
Neil Kersten, Public 1Vorks Director
Absent: Diana 1Vilhite, Councilmember
CXL, CUTA'F SE, SS10iY: \!iayor Munson callecl the rneeting to nrder at approximately 5:00 p.m. Tt was
moved by CouncilmEmbcr Uempsey, seconded and unanimously a~reed to mnve into Executive Sessian
for approximately an hour to diseuss larid acquisition and that no action Woulti be taken. '['he Executive
Session began at apprpximately 5:05 p.m. '1'he meeting adjourned at appro:timately 6:00 p.m.
~
~
~
Richard Munson, Mayor
A1 I'ES'1':
Christine }3ainbridge, City Clerk
Council Minutes: 06r10-03 1'ags 1 of ]
Approvcd by Cauncil:
DRAFT
~
~ J MIIVUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Counci112egulur Meeting
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Mayor vlunson called the mecting to order at 6:05 p.m., and weleomccl everyone to the 138th meeting.
Attendance• City StRff
Rich Munson, Mayor Dave Mercier, City Manager
Dick Denenny, Deputy vlayor Mike Connelly, City Attorney
Rose Dempsey, Councilmember ' Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Aill Godimann, Councilmember Nleil Kersten, Public Works D'►rector
Steve 'T'aylnr, Councilmember Kathy vleClung, Community Dev. Director
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
Mike Jackson, Ueputy City vlanager
Absent: Steve `Vorley, Senior Fn?ineer
Diana Wilhitc, Councilmember Cary .Driskell, Deputy City Attomey
Carolbelle Branch, Public tiiformation Officer
Chris T3ainbridge, City Clerk
1~'VOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten, of Valley Assembly Church, gave the invocation.
FLEDCE OF ALI..I±~GIANCE: AC 1vlayor Munson's request; a member of Boy Scout Troop 423 led lhc
Pledge of Allegiance.
~ 120LL CAI.,L: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all councilmembers were present except
Councilrnember VI'ilhite. It ►vas tnoved by Deputy Aluyor Denetmy, secorrded, and inruninrously ugreed to
ezcuse Councilii7enrher Wilhilefrom tonig6il's ineeting.
SPECIAL RFSOLUTIU\`: Councilmember Dempsey read a resolution ending winter as of tomnnow
morning. It ivas rnoveti, secnyrded, arld ttrtariimously ctgreed to approve the Kesolution.
APPROVAI., 4F AGE\DA: it was rrloved by Councilmetnber Tcrylor, seconded and :ntaltinznusly
ugreer.l to approve the umentled agenda.
]NTRODUCTIO\ OF S1'ECIAL GUESTS AND PRFSE\TA"1'IONS: Mayor vlunson welcomed
members of 13oy Scout `I'roop #423.
COMMTTTTE. BOA12D. LTATSON SiJNPIA7ARY REPUI2TS:
CotmcilmemUer Gothmann: reported that he attended a SNAP mecting where they discussed the "re-
branding" of their organictition, that the first meeting of the I'anhanclling Committce was also held, and
was attended by Deputy City Attorney 17riskell who gave the committee members information regarding
legal aspects and choices concerning panhandling;; ancl he attended the Liberty I..ake State of the City
Address.
Gouncilmember Dempsey: explained that she attended the Prayer l3real:fast, the F'anhandling Committee
meeting, and the Washington State Board of Education meetiiig
peputy MEor Denenny: mentioned he attended the Regional Hcalth District meeting and that they
continue the search for an cxecutive medical director.
~ CQUncilmember Tavlor: stated that he was on vacation last wcek, hut did attend the Mayor's leadership
prayer br&-ikfast; and the meeting of Spokane Regional Affordable liousing 'I"ask 1'orce; and mentioned
Council Rebular Mccting: 06-10-08 Page 1 of 5
ADDroved bY Council:
D12AFT
that iis of this Friday, he will no longer be employed with the Homebuilders Association, and has
accepted another job widh a public eomnany in tlie area.
Councilmember Schimmels: said that he attended the East Valley School District Meeling, and mentioned
the art class presentation which hacl about twenty•-five entries, one of which reccived a_first place award
and will be placecl in thc Cannon Tunncl in Washington, D.C. which is the walkway inside the U.S.
Capitol builcling through which members of Congress, conoressional staff, lobhyists and the general
public enter.
'MAYOR'S RTPORT: Mayor ~vlunson reported that he attencled the initial meetino for the panhandling
cmmnaittee and eave the committee their charge; he attended the Veteran's Homc Halfivay Wouse in East
Spokttne; the Climate Advisory Board Meetina; the 1'rayer Breakfast; met widi hvo citizens to discuss
developing neighborhooci cotmcils; attended the Spokane Transit Authority Operations mceting where
they discussed new busses and new routes; he hosted t.he Northeast iNlayor's Association mecting in
Spokane Valley; while in Seattle attended an initial meeting of CTED (Community Trade and Economic
Development) and tliae a commitcee was formecl of elected and appointed officials and members from tlie
private seetor to Examine lhe laws passecl last year; and to address applying climate change considerations
tp the Growth Nianagernent Act; he attended a local broadcast about giving some engraved pieces of
cement to the Vallcy Ivluscum, that the pieces were part of Highway 10 extending from Seattle to
Minneapolis, and were laid in 1919. Mayor Munson also mentioned that 1=larry Sladich called him to
explain he w•nuld like Council to llear about a proposal to have a jaLZ festival associated with Valleyf.'est,
and vtayor Munson sue„gested dial peehaps Council could holtl another round of applications for T.,odging
Tax Funds, and added that Mr. Sladich is uncertain if there is ample time to hold such a festival this year,
and he is waiting to hear from Valleyfest as well.
$rief discussion ensued coneei-iling opening the application process for locloing tax funds, of the surplus
funding in that account, and that the funds can now be used in a broader extent then the marketing intent
previously authorizecl. Mayor Munson said thal Mr. Sladich does not have a formal prnposal yet and that
he is scheduled to address this issue at an upcoming council meeting.
PUl3LIC CONTnILb]TS: Mayor Munsoti itivited general public cnmment.
Steve I'rabun, 1918 S Stanlev: explained that he spokc several weeks ago concernino outdoor lighting,
that hc received a response froin Com.muniry Development Director McClung, and that he now submiLfi ,
another letter ro request an amcndment to the City of Spokane Valley Uniform Devclopment Code, Title
22, Outcloor Lightiiiig Standards, ar►d askeci if Council would consider directing City staff to lmencl the
ordinance language to include one and rivo-family dwcllings; he said he was infoizned lhat he could
initiate tlie codc amendment process b}' paying a$700 application fee, but that asking Cotmcil to direcC
staff tn make a eode amendmenC is his preferred choice. 1'his prompted Council disc:ussion concerning
the process and his issue, and Mayor vlunsnn suggested staff repart back to Council cnneerning the most
appropriate way to coiuicler this request.
a PUBLTC IiEARITG• Proposed 2009-2014 '1'ransportatinn Improvement Pro_ ram (TIP) Steve Worley
Mayor Munson openecl the publie hearing At 6:32 p.m. ancj invited Enbineer Worley to the podium. Mr.
1Vorley explained that state statute requires that a public hearing be held in preparation to adopt the six
year transportation impro<<ement prograrn (T1P); and that the attache<l draft 2009-2014 plan has been
revised slightly fi-om die one presented at the May 6 st'udy sessinn; and as a result of the passing nF the
Spokane Transit Eluthority (S"fA) 0.3% sales tax levy, five projccts are now listed as "secured" for
funding; i.e. T'incs/Sprague Intersection; Evcrgreen Sprague Intersection, I.ndianalSullivan intersection,
Mcl7nnald Sprague interscction, and Broadway Sullivan intersection. Mr. \'Vorlcy also dislributed copies
of an updated "Capital J.rnprnve►nent f'rogram Nunding Problem Statement #3" showing the 2009-14 .
secured projec#s. Mr. VVorley also mentioned the inercased amount of fiincling to the STrP (septic tauk
Council Regular Meeting: 06-10-08 Page 2 of 5
Apprqved by Council:
DRAFT
0 elimination program) and said diat there are khree remaining years i.n the nrogram, and they are getting
into neighboncoods now that are larger with wider roads, and in some placcs a clifferent curbing whieh
causes costs to increase for full-width paying; and dlat in ankicipation of dhose costs, they have increased
the funding to STEP from the previ4us draft; and those changes are seen in ycllow highlighted areas on
the Problem Statement #3 handout. Mayor vlunson invited public coinment; no comments were offered
and Mayor vlunson closed the public heari.ng at 6:44 p.m.
2 PUBLIC HEARING• State Performance Audit Rcport on I'ublic Records - Justin r laa. Performance
Audit Manager of Washinoon State Auditor's Office
Ma}ror Munson opened the public hearing at 6:44 p.m. and invited vlr. Flaa to the podium. Mr. Flaa
expressed than.ks for the opportunity to eYplain this audit performance process, and said that this is the
first of this type to impact the City of Spokane Valley; that tliis audit foeused on the openness of
government and customer service in dealing with public records requests; that they examineci ten cities,
ten counties, and ten state agencies and monitored the responses to public record reyuests to determinc
compliance; that the State Auclitor's office had four findings, and none affected Spokane Valley, and said
that Spokane Valley ranked first regardi»g timeliness in responses; and was at the top along with other
entities, in conformance. Mr. T'laa explainecl that a requirement of Tnitiative 900 is that entities hold a
public hearing within thirty days of the issuance of the Report, and then tn generate a eeport by July 1 of
each year to address the findi.ngs. Mayor Ivlunson invited public comment; no comments were offered.
City vlanager Mercier mentioncd that City Clerk Bainbridge is the public records offiicer, and that she
worl:s closely with many other members of staff to cQOrdinatc document retrieval, and that Ueputy City
Clerk Carrie Acosta maintains a database to document all the reque.sts. Council expressed Xheir
appreciation to the entire staff for making this a successful effort. Mayor Munson closed the public
~ hearing at 7:01 p.m. 3. CUNSE\'T AGC\`DA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a 'group. A
Councilrnember may remove an item from the Consenl Aaenda to be cnnsidered separately.
a. Approval of fallowing claim vouchcrs:
VOUCI-I:E,R LIS'1 VOUCIIEFZ #s TOTAL VOUCHFR
pATE AiVIOUNT
05/0812008 Be innin Nv/9 14352, endin w/#14467 2,022,495.68
05/2012008 ]3e inninpw/#]44G8 endin w/#14554 514,345.31
0560/2008 Be innin g w/ # 14555, endin %v/# 14652 836 818.20
GRAND TOTAL $3,373,659.19
b. Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 15, 2008: $220,469.67
c. Payroll for Pay Pcriod Ending 1V1ay 31, 2008: $312,527.43
d. Approval of Resolulion 08-012 Setting Planniiig Commission July 10, 2008 Public Hearing for
Streel Vacation Request STV 0 1-08
e. Storm Drainage 1'•,asement - Cary Driskell
f. Appraval of vleeting Minutes of vlay 6; 2008 Council Study Session
g. Approval of Meeting Minutes of May 13, 2003 Cnuncil Regular Meeting
h. Approval nf Meeting Minutes of Mav 20, 2008 Council E-xecutive Session Special Mceting
i. Approval of Mcetino Minutes of May 20, 2008 Council Study Session
It ivas nroved hy Caiarcilniember Taylor, secortded and ununimously agreed !o upprove the Conseirl
Agendu.
C)I
Council Regular Meeting: 06-10-03 Page 3 of 5
I
D1tAF"1 I
~
NE W BUSiNESS:
Nfemorandum of ~
4. Pro nsed Resolution 08-013 Iaelenatin = Si'~nature Authori for Utili Y
Understandinas - Mikc Jackson
~
r~t Mayor Munson's request, City Clerk 13ainbridge read the resolution title, fallowed by a motiorr b)
Councilmember Tciylvr, whic3i was secotrdecl, tn approve Kesoltrlion 08-013 delegating aulhority to the
Ciry Mrnzuger or desigiiee ta e.recute utiliry af;reements related to city street capital prnjects. 17eputy City
Manaber Jackson esplaincd that theee was Council consensus at the March I$ study session to place t-his
item as a ftiture agenda item for mot'ion consicleration; tbat in the past, Council reviewed and approvetl
individual utility mernorandum of understandinus relatcd to street capital projects, but to strea.mline tbis
process, staff suggests Council delegate this authority to the Cih, Manager, ihus saving the time of
developing the RCA and presenting the item to Council. Mayor Niunson invited public comment; no
comments were offered. In response to Councilmember Taylor's question, Mr- Jaekson confirmed t:hat
there have not been any problems witb past agrecments. Vote by Acclanratran' In xavor' Unaninrnus.
Opposecl.' None. Abstentions' A'one. Motion car•ried.
5. N4otion Consideration 13ar1cer Road Bricloe CT12v1 Nill CQntract Amendment - Steve WorleY
It ►vas nroved by Cauncilmenrber Tayla' artd seconded, tn azitlroreze the Crty 1Vlanuger ar designee to
amend the current contract with CH2M HiU fo inclutle canstrieclion maiaage►nent services in the unrount
oj$560, D00. Enginecr Worley related some of the history of the Barker Road Bridge Projec•t ancl said that
C1-I2M Hill has been the CiCy's engineering and cnvironmental co»sultant for the design af the project,
that the City has hiretl a bridge inspeator For on-site observations but additional assistance is required to
manage the construction contract in accordanec with federal requirements. ivlayor Munson invited public
comment; no comment:,s were offerecl. Vote by Acclcunation: In x'avor.• Unanimous. CJppused: Norte.
Abstentions: Nvne. Motiun carried.
pURLIC COMMENTS Ma)'or Vlunson invited general public comment; no comments were offerzd.
ADTtN1STI2A.TIVF 1ZEPURTS:
6 Transl2orcation 13enefit District Uvdate (TBD)- Cary Driskell
Deputy City Attorney 17riskell explaineci that this is the fiftt► opportunity to discuss the Transportalion
Benefit District as a potential funding option tor street work; that he previously provided a draft ordinance
which is also included in tonighc's materials, anci ciientioned that he met with representat.ives from the
Association of Washington Cities and the Association of Washingion Count.ics, and the Spokane
Regional Tr,"sportation Commission regarding methods lo implement a TBD, and with Council
concurrence, said he will continue to Nvork with those groups and bring future reports tn Council. Council
agree_d.
7. Yublic Works Customer Service Impro~~ements ~'lans - Steve Worley/ Neil Kcrsten
Via a PowerPoint presentation, Public Works Aireetor Kersten updatcd Council on the Customer Sciviee
Improvement Plan rn4del which wa.s presented to Counci) la.st year and which received approval to
increase the CIP staff to four pnsitions; he explained the successful funding received in 2006, f lling the
vacitnt engineering tech position in September 2007, upLradi.ng the vac;ant Froject Enginecr position to a
$enior Project I;ngineer, which position was filled in November 2407, the hiring of an administralive
assistant in L7ecember 2007, and the hiring of a senior project engineer, assistant engineer and engineering
technician in January of 2008; which Me explained, has provided signifcant improvement in the abilit}'to
accomplish capital pro,jects. 'The list of 2005 projects was also shared with Couneil, which list provcd to
be extensive; and which showed a total funded projcct cost for 2008 to 2011, of over $62 million dollars.
Mr. Worley explained some of the basic conipnnents that go into engi.neering a project, arid added that
there -vvill be construction in the ne•xt few weeks on such areas as Aarker Rnad Briclge, PinesJMansfield,
and numerous intersections. Councilmember Taylor commended the work of the members of the Public
Works Department, and stated that Council is aware of the high level of technical expericnce done by
Council Regular Meeting: 06-10-08 Page A pf S
A .,...,..,AA ti., r- nnn cil•
D17AFT
~ phenomenally .vell-educated staff in thal department. Mr. Worley also briefly mentioned the 241° Avenue
project and of the need to close that road completely so the contractor can grind and mia all at onee,
adding that of course, the road wauld not be totally closed to those resiclents.
INFQRMATION ONILY: 8. Response to Public Comments - Kathy McClung. This item was fnr
information Anly and not reporced or discussed.
- FZemoed frc~m ~ ~en
Mayor Munson asked Council if they were amenable to set a meeting with Michael T'reedman for July 23
regarding deliberations on the subarea plan, and Council concurred to hold the July 23 meeting beginning
at 6:00 p.m.
'I here being no fur[her business, it was mnved by Cornicilnzember Taylor, secnnded, rnid wialtimaawly
crgreed tn adjocrrn. The mecting adjourned at 7:30 p.m.
A'I'vl"EST:
R-ichard ivlunson, Mayor
~ Christi»e I3ainbridge, Cit}' Clei•k
Cl/ .
Council Regular Meeling: 06-10-08 Page 5 of 5
Approved by Council:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ,bc0 old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ infortnation ❑ admin. report 0 pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 08-011, Comprehensive Plan Amendments
(includes text and map amendments)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Management Act)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On June 3, 2008, Council was briefed at the study session on
comprehensive plan map amendments CPA-01-08 through CPA-15-08. A staff memo addressing Council
questions on CPA-03-08 is attached.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs
from November 2 to November 1 of the following year. The Planning Commission considers applications
received prior to the November 1 deadline in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a
recommendation to City Council in late spring/early summer.
All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text) can be amended during the annual cycle. The
Community Development Department received eight requests from the public for site-specific Comprehensive
~an amendments for 2008. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment automatically
.iceive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan Map designation.
Additionally, staff initiated Comprehensive Plan text amendments to Chapter 1- Introduction; Chapter 2-
Land Use; Chapter 3- Transportation; Chapter 5- Housing; Chapter 7- Ec4nomic Development; Chapter 8-
Natural Environment and Chapter 9- Parks, Recreation and the Arts. Staff added Map 2.2 indicating Potential
Annexation Areas (PAAs) for the City of Spokane Valley.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan rnap amendment proposals
are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, comprehensive plan
maps, zoning maps, aerial maps, vicinity maps, transportation maps, and letters submitted to date to assist the
City Council's review.
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 8, 2008, to consider the
proposed map and text amendments. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made recommendations
on CPA-01-08 through CPA-15-08 excluding CPA-07-08 and CPA-48-08. The Commission continued the
public hearing for CPA-03-08 to May 22, 2008. On May 22, 2008, the Planning Commission deliberated on
CPA-03-08 and held a hearing on CPA-07-08 and CPA-08-08. After heanng public testimony, the Commission
made recommendations on CPA-03-08, CPA-07-08, and CPA-08-08.
OPTIONS: Move ordinance to second reading; remand to Planning Commission for further consideration; or
conduct a public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's recommendation.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Advance ordinance 08-011 to a second reading
d ~TAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager; Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior
lanner
1 of 2
\
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance
Exhibit 2: Pianning Commission Minutes (5-8-48 and 5-22-08)
Exhibit 3: Memorandum regarding CPA-03-48
1
~
2of2
CITY OF SYOKANI: VALLLY .
SPOKANE COU1V'IY, WASl3[NGTON
ORDINAIVCE NO. 08-011
AN ORAINANCF C)F TAF, C1TY OF SPQKAl\'E VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASfTIINGTON, A.MENAING ORAJNANCE 06-010 A.DQMINC: THE CITY OF
SPUKANL VALLLY COMI'REHENSIVE, PL,AN AlVla PR()-v'IAING FOR QTHER
MATTEI2S PROPEIYLY RCLATING TATRFTn.
Wf-EREAS, thrnugh SPokane Valley Ordinance 06-010, thc City of Spokane Valley
adopted Land Use plans and regulations as set fnrth in the Camprehensive Plan, Capital
Facilities Plan; and Maps as the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Spokane Valle.y; and
WNFREAS; the Washington State Growth Ivlanagement Act (GMA) dllows
comprehensive plans to be arnended annually (RCW 36.74130); aad
VNIIEREAS, amenclments to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive l?lan may be
initiated by the Plann.ing Commission (Commi'ssion), thc City Council (Council) or by the
i-
Comrnunity Development D'uector based on cilizen requeSLs 4r when changcd conditions
warrant adjustmenls; and • .
WIlL1ZEAS, the GMA requires comprchensive plans: to _ be implemented with
development regulations, includi.ng the 'zoning of property cons'istent with land use map
~ designations; ancl
WHEREAS, consistent --with the GMA, City o.f. Spokane Valley adopted Public
Farticipaiion Guicielines to direct .the public involvement process for aciopling and amending
comprehensive plRs;- and,_ - , .
NVI4Ef2EAS, the ComprehensivePlan, provides thai amendment applications shall be
received until NOVember 1 of each year; and
V,IBEREAS, applications were submittcd by the applicant, o,,Aner or •by City slaff to
amend 'the Comprehensive Plan and. Zon.i.ng Maps for the purpose of bencficially usi.ng the
property described herein; a.nd
WHEREAS, following the applieation to the Ciry, staff conducted an eiivironmenta]
, review to determ.i.ne the potential env'uonmental impacts from the proposed amend.ments; and
WkI.FRFAS, afler reviewing the Environmental Checklists, sta _ff. issueci a Determination
of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the proposals, published the DNS in the Valley News I-Ierald,
posted the DNS on the sitcs and mailed the llNS to all a.ffected public agencies; and
WHFR.EAS, the Comrnission conducted a briefing on May 1, 2008, to review thc
proposed amcndments; and
Ordinance 08-0 l l Comp Plan Amcndments Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, notice of the CUmmission,public hearing was published i.n the Valley News
Herald at least 14 days prior to the hearing; and ~
WHEREAS, on April 23, 2008, noticc of the Commission hearing was mailed to all
properiy owners within 400 feet of the subject properiy ; and
WHEREAS, nntice of the hearing was posleci un the subjcct property; and
WHEREAS, the Commission received evidence; information, public testimony and a
staff repart and recommendatipn at a public heari.ng on viay 8, 200$; and
WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a publ.ic hearing on Niay 8, 2008, to consider
proppseci amendments to ihe Camprehensive Plan Land Use inap and text. tlftcr hearing public
testimony, the Commission made recommendations on CPA-QI-08; CPA-02-08, and CPA-04-08
through CPA-06-08. Further resea.rch wa.s requcsted on CPA-03-08. The Commission also
delibcrated on the proposed staff initiated text amendments. 1 he Comm.ission 'continued the
public hearing to May 22, 2008 for CYA-03-48, CFA-07-08; and CPA-08-08; and .
WHEREAS, the Comm.ission deliberatcd on CPA-03-08, CPA-07-08, and CPA-08-08 on
May 22, 2008; the Commission recommended approval of all piecedi.ng anenciments; and
WHEREAS, on Juue 3, 2008, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and
WI-IERFAS, on June 10, 2008, Council eorisidered a fiist ordinanc;e reading to adopt thc '
proposed amendmenl; and . WHLREAS; on June 24, 2008, Council consiciered a second orciinance readi.ng at which
ti.me Council approved Nvritten rnciings of fact setting forth their basis for recomznendi.n;
approval of the proposed acnendments.
NOW, Tkl.EPEFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Va11ey do ordain as
fo1lovJs: - ~ Section 1. Purpose. "lhepurpose of lhis Ordinance is to amend the Comprehensive
Plan and Ma~i(s) adoptcd through Ordinance No. 06-010, a.nd a.mend the Comprehensive Plan
text adopted lhrough Ordi.na.nce Nv. 06-010.
Scction 2. Findings. The City Council ack.nowledges that the Commission conducted
appropriate investigation and study, held a public hcaring on the applicatinn and recommends
apprUVal of the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan map and tcxt. The City Council hereby
adopts the f.i.ndings of the Commission, sPecifically that:
1. Notice for the proposed amenciments was placed in tbe Spokane Valley News Herald on April
23, 2008 and each site was posted with a"i~]otice of Public Heari.ng" sign; with a description nf
the proposal. 1
l ~
Ordinanee 08-011 Coinp Plan Amendments Page 2 of 6
2. Individual notice af the.map amcndmcnt.proposals was mailed to a11 propezty owners Nvithin 400.
~J feet of each affected sile.
3. Pursuant to thc State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA - RCW 43.21C) environmental cbecl:Jists
were requircd for each proposed comprehensive plan map and teact amendment.
4. Staff reviewed the Environmental checklists and a threshUlci determination was made for each
comprehensive plan amcndment request, Determ.inations of Non-significance (DNS) were
issued for the requested comprEhensive plan amendments on February 15, 2008.
5. The DNS's were published in thc city's official newspaper on February 15, 2008 consistent with
the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance.
6. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 8, 2008, to
consider the proposed amendments. After hearing public I:esti,riaony, the Commission made
recommendatic>ns on CPA-01-0$ thru CPA-15-08, excluding CPA-03-08, CPA-07-08, and Cl'A-
08-08. .
7. Thc Commission conti.nued the public hearing for CPA-03-08 to May 22, 2008. Due to a
noticing error, CPA-07-08 and CPA-08-08 was hea'rd on May 22, 2008 to ensure cpnsistency
with Title 17.80.12013.
Qn May 22, 2008, the Commissian made recommcndations'on CPA-03-08, CPA-07-08; and
CPA-08-08. . .
9. `1 he plavning gnals of the Growth Management Act (GMA) were considercd and the
proposcd amendments are consistent vvith the GMA.
10. The goals and policies of the Spokane Valley Comprehen'si~,e. Plan weze considered and the
proposed amendments are consistent A7th 'the ComprEhensive Plau.
~ 11. The proposed land use and zoning designatitins ar.e `consisterit with the current use of the
proper(ies. .
12. l~indings were made,'~and: factors were -considereci la ensurc compliance with Section
17.80.140 H. (Cpmprehensiv6 plan Amendment APproval Criteria) of thc Spokane Valley
Mun.icipal Code•(SVMC). -
13. The Comprehensive Plan Land t.Ise Map and text amendments Arill not adver-sely affect the
public's general health,* saf.ety, arid.welfare: :S&tion 3. ~ Fro er .`l'hc properties subject to this Ordinance are described iu the
attached Attachment "A." - Seetion.4. Map Amendments. i'ursuant ta RC`V 35A.63.073 the City of 5pokane
Valley Comprehensivc Pla.n and MaP as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-0I0, is hereby
amencied as scf forth on the attached Attachment "A." The Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendments are generally described as follows:
~
Ordinance 0$-011 Comp Plan Amendments Page 3 of 6
Map Amendmcnts
~
File No. Cl'A-01-08:
Application/I)cscription of Proposal: Comprehensive i'lan Map amendment from l.ow
Density R.esidential to Medium Taensity Residential on approximately 2.07 acres of land.
Applicant: Greg Arger, 300 North Mullen Road, Suite 204, Spakane Vallcy, WA 99205
A.mcnciment Location: South of Mission Avenue on Mamer Road at 1204 North Vlamer Road
and 1112 North Ivlamer Road; specifically located in the NE'/4 of Section 15, Township 25
North, Range 44 EWM; parcel number(s) 45151.0926 and 45151.1216, Spokane Valley,
Washington. Council Decision: Change to Medium llensity Residential
File iNo. CPA-02-08:
Application/Description of Proposal: Comprehensive P1an Map amendment from Low
Density Residential to Corridor Mixeci Use on approximately 23 acres of land.
AppGcant: Joe Stoy, clo IIaker Construction; 2711 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, 1NA 99202
Amendment Location: North of Trent Avenue (SR290) at 8124 East Carlisle Avenue;
spECifically located in the NW '/4 of Section 7, Tawnship 25 North, Kange 44 E`VM; parc;el
number 45072.7003, Spokane Valley, Washington. ' . .
Council lletision: Change to Corridor Mi.xed Use
. F
File No. CPA-03-08: Further research was'requested
AppGcaNon/f)c.scriptiun of Proposal: Camprehensive 1'lan Map amendment fram Low
Density Residential to Office on approximately 3.1 acres of ]a.nd.
Applicant: Dennis Raugust, c/o Boulder Creek; Inc., 19012 Nevada Road, Spangle, WA 99033
Amendment Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Nlarguerite Road and A]ki
Avenue addressed as 8962 Easf Alki Avenue, 420 North Margueritc Road, 500 Nortli Marguerite
Rqaci, 508 North Margi.ierite Rpad ~and 510 Nor[h MArguerite Rpad; specifically locateci in the
SE '/4 or Sectian 18; 1"ovvnship 25 North, Range 44 -EWW; parcel number(s) 45184.0804;
45184.0805, 45.1.84.0807, 45184.0819 and 451.84.0$20, Spokanc Valley, Washington.
Council Decision: Change to Office File No. CPA-04-08 .
Application/Deseription of Proposal: Contprehensive Plan Map amendmeut from Corrid4r
Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential on approximately 3.0 acres of land.
Applicant: Stephen H. Ford Xc Victor N. Canper
Amendment I.ocation: '1'he propvsal is located south of Sprague Avenue bn Tschirley Street at
120 S. Tschirley, 106 S. 7'schirley and parcel to the north of 106 S. Tschirley; SPCCI.E1Cay
located in the NW '/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 FWM; parcel numbcrs
55192.9029, 55192.9051, and 55191.9052, Spokane Valley, Washington.
Council llecision: Change to Medium Density Residential
I+"ile No. CPA-05-08
Application/ncscription of Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low
Density Residential to Office on appraximalely 1.56 acres of land.
Applicant: TNJ on Rroadway, LLC
Ordinance 0$-011 Comp Plan Amendments Page 4 of 6
0 Amendment:Location: `'he proposal is located belween Cataldo and Broadway Awnues east .
of Pines af 11901 E. Broadway Ave; specifically located in ihe NE '/4 of Section 16, ToHmshiP
25 North, Range 44 F W'M; Parcel number 45161.1171, Spokane Valley, Wa..~hington. ,
Council Decision: Change ta Office
File No. CPA-06-08
Application/Description of Prnposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low
llcnsity Residential to Of£ce on approximatcly 4.82 acres of land.
Applicant: Nick Abariotes
Amendment Location: 7`hc proposal is located bet~reen Cataldo ana Broadway Avenues east
of Pines at 11813 F. Broadway Ave; specifically located i.n the NF 1/4 of Section 16, '1'oNi,nship
25 North, Range 44 EWM; parcel number 45161.1127, Spokand Valley, Washington.
Council Decision: Change to Office
File No. CPA-07-08 -
Applicationll)escription uf Proposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low
I7ensity Residential to Community Comiuercial on approximately 1.24 acres of land.
Applicant: _
DvNright J. Hume .
Amcndment Location: , - .
Northwcst of the intersection of Carnahan koad and 3`d Avenue at 228 S. Carnahan Road;
specifieally located i.n the NW 1/4 of Sectiari 23, Township 25 North, Ranae 43 EWM; parcEl
number 35232.1509, Spokane Valley, Wa.shington.
~ Council Decision: Change tn Community Comme'rc'ial Filc No. CPA-08-118, -
ApplicationLDescriphon.of Froposal: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low
Density Residential to Office on app.roximately 1.02'acres of land.
Applicant:
Dwight J. Hume. Amendment Lacatic►n:
East of Sullivan Road and one lot north c~F Century Avenuc at 644 S. SuUivan Road; specifcall}~
located 'in' the I~?E 1/4 oP S,eetion 23, To~~rnship 25 ~Iorth; itange 44 EWM; parcel number
45231.2244, Spokane Valley, Washington. Council Decision:. Change to 4ffice
Comprehensn°c Plan Texf Amendments. Pursuant to RC«' 35A.63.073 the City of Spokane
Valley Comprehensive Plan and Map as adopted through Ordinance No. 06-010, is hercby
amended as set fort}i on the atlached Attachment "B" (amended text fpr Chapter 1-
Introduction; Chapter 2- Land Use; Chapter 3- Transportation; Chapter 5-Housing; Chapter 7
- Fconomic Development; Chapter Natural Environment and Gha-pter 9- Parks, Kccreation
and the Arts.) and Attschment "C" (Map 22 indicating Potential Annexation A.reas (k'AAs) ror
the City of Spokane Valley).
Section 5. Map - Copies on File-Admin.istrative Action. The Comprchensive Plan
~ (wikh Maps) is maintained in the affice oF the City Clerk as well, as the City DePartment of
Ordinance 08-011 Curnp Plan Atnendments Page 5 of 6
Commun.ity.T)evelopment. The City Manager or dcsignee, following adoplion of,.this:Ordinance, is authorized to modify thc Comprehensive Plan lviap in a manner cc>nsistent «ith this
Ordinance.
Sectian 6. Liabilitv. The express intent of the City of Spokane Valley is that the
responsibility f'or campliance Nvith the provisions of this ordinance shall rest -vvith the perm.it
applicant and theu agents. This ordinance and its provisions are adopted wilh the express intent
tn protect ttie hea.lth, safety, and wclfare of the general public and are not intended tp protect any
particular class of individuals or organizations.
Section 7. Severabilily. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of t6is ordinance -
shall be held to be invalid or unc;onstitutional by a court of eompetent jurisdiction, such
invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity ar constitutionality of any other
section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance. _
SecHon 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance sha11 be in full force and effect five (5)
ciays after publication of this Ordinance or a sluhmar5r thereof in the official nm~spaper of the
City nf Spokane Valley as provideci by law. ~ .
~
PASSrIa by the City Council this day of 1unc; 200$
tvfapdr; Rich Mimson '
A'C`l'EST: ' . . - City Clerk, C.hriStine Bainbridge J-
Approved As To Form:
Office of the City.Atfomey
llate of Publicatipn: '
L^'ffective Date:
Ordinance 08-0 11 Comp Plan Amendments I'age 6 of 6
ATTACHMENT A
MAP AMENDMENTS
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
~
Ilrti~hal '
I~(}W lilS1l% fllll[i1[f'C~L
(~eA1iAl
Nieciium I
I?ensit~
tteiw«tial J
~
Hi_n~Drr.si~~
}trsidrnt~a!
C'PA-O 1-08
l)1iirc
Low- cnsit~
Residrntial
(.ow• Deasity-
ResideatEal
Caul '
}{~rh Dan~it~
Put,tic: Qoas
c, ;iun~int: ~
Publi 61 1 1
- -
L
CPA-01-08 Reqrest; Cbaagc tbe Comprc6eosive Plin mop destpation
City of Spokane Valley {ram LDR lu MDR; c6anRe zoaing trom R-3 and R4 to MF-1.
Community Dc%clopmcM ncpnriment
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
Kblidqa.s,-
Fublic
L
Low Dea j
Resid t 1
TICPA-02-8
~
~.Eorridor
. iud:l sc
.
:
,
L,ow si
lYHidcatial
£ >
ru
CPA-02-OS ~~t; C6aage the Comprehensi~:e Plaa map dafgtution
City of Spokaac VaUey L,pR to CMU; c6aoge zoolng from R-2 to CMU.
Communlty De~elopment Qepsrtu~ea!
1: -
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
4
II
i
PnGlldQnasi-
Publfc
CPA-03-08
/
Low D sit}
ResldeotFal "
«'eSt t'al1C) "
CitN School
~
~
.
Pnbiic Quasi-
Pubtic ~
- " Ilr~.~t~ ' ~
f
ecident~al % {
e`r
CPA-03-08 Request: Chsagc t6c Comprehensive Plan map daignstbo
City otSpokAOe Vafley {rom LDR to O; cbsage zaniog from R-3/R4 tu GO.
Community Developmeat Departmmt
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
1; w Densit~ Public! , uas
r~iilentia Public \ ~
~Grcenacres
f►1 idd le
COfrIClQi' ' Z 6
Mhtd 1-
\
w ~
\
~
~
~
CPA-4A-48 \
~ runlic
•orn~a
l \ \ \
~
iu
e
c
~icclium E/c ;it~
Re~idc`nhal"-. 3_.
Uensih
RLqiden
t
CPA-04-Q8 Rtqdesi: ChBngt thc Comprehensive Plae map drsjgnattoa
CIly ot5pokaoe Vallcy from CMU to MF-1; cbanPr zualng icom CMU to MF•1.
Cammuaity Devcbpment Dcpartmcat
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
c
I.QW Dedsity
.c F~~de~tial
3
ar
CPA_05-05 I~iY~ 1)tnsit~'
F c.ictintia
~
.
OfTic~
[ttunclK a •
~lcdium tflSlLf
Residenitiel
Publ(dQutsi-
Publlc
E CPA-4S-08 Reqeest: C'hangc the Compreheosive Plna map de9ipption
C[ty of Spokane VaIlry ~u~ LDR to O; c6ange zoaing frnm R-3 to GO.
Commuaity Dcvrlopmeet lkpartment
Exhibit 1: Comprebensive Plan Map
~ LA-A sm.
~ Fr"ran
3 CPA-06-08
F{ i~h. cieatit.
+ csidrnuul
~
(1iTicr
♦~-a-H'~~'~~ij~:lW}U.MV
Nitllllipf t C111ttN
H t51(~lt1+I Ill ~
Pablirillujui-
PabUc
CPA-06-08 Ffrom 6aoge thc Compnbcosive Pian wap desi~aatios
C#y of Spokaae Valky ~,pR toO; change zonisg from R-3 to GO.
Commonity De~-rlopment Departmeat
rN}iihit l: C01"prehensive Plan Map
J
~~~mrncrr nl
~ ,,n~r• ~i - I
i _ L
7 r
. . , ~
-
} 'I~~~n~•~iu~,ii~• , ~ i ~
1 I .,n tncrii~ ~ ~
; ' t I . --~--4•••-- -
- -
irtcrcml i
~ ( ! CPA-07-0h
,
~
k
PublidQani-
Pubtic
~
3rd ;
VO
1-90
4th {th 4ty
w i?~ns
llisy s
~
[teafdent ~E
n
F-~ I
bu"Cr ' t-
Pubil
CPA-07-08 Reqnest: Chongc tMe Comprebensive Pha map desigaitiom
City of 5pokane Valley fy~om LDR to C; chaage mnia~ from R-4 to C.
Commanity Developmeat Departmeat
Exhibit 1: Comprehensive Plan Map
i-
4th
~
,t~~um
Iknsity ~-orni::rr~:.,1 ~
Roidential
s -
Officc ~`-~1L
}li~h (icnit~
RctiitticIttal
5di
C'PA-0S-08
Public+(luas~-
IAw~UM' puhlic
Restdcalial ~
:
>
Centrai
~'a11cv
Scnlor High
CPA-08-08 ~y~; Cbange the Comprc6enslve Plan map designatiae
C~y of Spokase VaUey ~rp LDR to O; c6mage zoatn; from R•3 to O.
Commnnity Devclopmeat Departmcet
ATTACHMENT B
AMENDED TEXT
Conmu,sr7v D r:vFL4Pn1rirv'r D F NnRrnrFNr
1PL4NWirc DrvisioN
~p an r ~~Ye STAFF ~2EPORT ANU R.ECO.MN~ENDA►TIUN TQ TA:~
~ V~1e3' p~~G Co~SSYO~N
Compreherisive Plan fett Amendments:
CHAI'TER 1- INTRODUCTION
CHAPTE R 2 - LAND II$E
CHAPT,FR 3- TRAN$PORTATION
CH"TER 5 - HUUSING
CHAPTE R-7 - ECONOM:iC DEVELOPMEIVT
C13APTER 8 - lYA'TI7KAL ENVTRONNiENT
C]FIAPTER 9=.PARKS, RECREATION AND THEARTS
S"i►kane Vape Munici al Code- A endix 19-A
SrAFFRF,powrDa°rE: April.24, 200.8
.HT-?A[tUVG DATE AND 7.,OCATTON: May 8, 2008, begiiming-at 6:04 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Ca.uncil Cfianibers,
Valley Redwood Plaza Building; .l 1707 East Spi`ague Avenue, -Suite.lOl., Spokane Valley, Washingt03i 99206.
. PRaPOsAL DcsCRiPTim: The.following aittendiiietits are being..recommended:
CITY INI'TIAT'ED'GOMF'R.EHENSIVF PI.AN AMEND'MCN'['S
File 'Number Ma or Text SumTrixry nf Amendment
CPA-04-08 Tezt Cha ter 1- Introduction: Minor u daie5.
~ CPA-l 0-0 8 Map & tc-xt Chaptcr 2- Land Use: Identify potential annexAtion areas for ffie
City; Uses in .Gomdor Mixed Use and Mixed Use Center
(A endix 19-A .
CPA-19 -08. Map & text C14ter 3- Transportation: Neiv bike/p'e8est6an map.and
'cortes ondin- text
CPA-12-08 Text Gha ter'S -Nousinv: "Minor.u tlates to data-
GPA-] 3-08 Text Cha fer 7- FcAnomic Aevelo munt: U datcs tn data.
CBA-14U8 Text Gha ter 8- Naturil Environment_ U date to Goals and 1'olicies
CPA-l 5-08 Text Chieer 9- Parks, Recc-eation and the Aits:. Minor a dates to text.
This proposal is consitlerod a non-projecl,action undcr.RCW 432IC.
YROPOSAL LOCATTOiY: The proposal affects the entum City of:Spakane Valley,, Washington;
APYL,]CANT: City.of Snokane Valiey, WA
AF'PROVAL CRITF.RIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 21 (Envimnineiital Contmis) of the Spokane Valley
Municipal_ Cade (SVMC).
$UI►'(M,ARY QR.l7LCOA9MENDATION: The Planningpivision recanimends tha.t the Planning Commission proposed text
amendments to fhe att'ached. Comprehensive Plan text and updating Appendix 19-A of the'Spokane Valley.
STAFH 'PLAV3YER: Greg McCormick„AICP, Planning:Manager, Community Development Department
A'(TACHhi EN'[°S:
L„ . :~xhibit 1: Chapter ! - Ifitrod'uction Fxliibit-2 Chapter_2=Land Usc
13-5ch'tbit.3: Chapter3 ='Cransportatinn
Staff Rermrt ancl Rrwmmcnda(ioa to Ihc Ptanning.CoiTUnissian for CPA-67-0$
Aagc'1 of3.
rxliiUit 4: Chapter S - i-Iousing
Exhibit 5: Chapter 7- Economie Development ~
Exhibit C: Chapter 8-Natural Environment ~
Exhibit 7: Chaptar 9- Parks, Recreai:ion and the Arts. ExhibiE 8: Uiiiform Development.Code - Appendix° ] 9-A; Schedule of Permitted and Accessory Uses
Exhibit 9: SEFA Uetennination .
Exliibit 10: Agency Coinments
Eachibit 11: Public:Comments
BACKGROUND INFOkMAT.ION
A. ,A,PPLlCATIOIr°"1'ROCF3SING
ChapCer 17.80 Permit .Pracessing Procedures in t}ie Spn.kane Valley Ivtunieipaf Code (SVMC). The Following
summarizes key applieation proceclures for fhe proposaL.
A licafion Subniittecl: November 1, 2007
Taetermination of Com leteness: November. l, 2007
Issuance ofDetermination of'N1on-Si ificance' DNS. : A ril 24, 2008
Fnd of Appeal Period .for DNS: 3v1ay 8, 2008
I?ate of Putilisbed Notice of Public Iqesiin T: A ril 18, 240$
Date ofMailed Notice of Public Heariv : A ri l 18 2008
B. S(9A4A1.tR1' nF TE\T AIYLET'DMLR'TS
II. FINDTNGS ANI) CONCLUSIONS SF'ECIFiC T0 SEPA ~
.
Findin
gs:
I'ur~uant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) ofthe Spokane Va.lli;y Municipal Code (SVMC), the leatl agency has
defermined that this proposal does not have a probable. sibmifcailt adverse impact on'the environtnent. An
Cnvir6nttiental.Impact-Statemenl(F.1S) is noti=equired uiiderRCW 43..21C.030(2)(c). -nie Plannint Division.is5ued
a Deieritiinafion of Non-Sigriificance (DNS) ror the proposal. This decision was rnade. after review'of.a completed
envir.onntental chccklist and otlier inforination ,on file wittt tlie.lead, agency.
Conclusiou(s):
The procedural reguirements of the State 8nvironment.il Pcilicy Aet atid Title-21 of `the SV.MC have'been fulfilled by
the applic;anl.'s Submittal of the. requ.ireil ,SEPA Checklist, and the 'is"suance• of tlie- Cit}'•'5'llirCShcil,d deteriiiina.tibri
cons'►sting of a Dzterminafion of Non-Significznce (DNS): No.appeals were receivod.
W. FINDINGS ANU CONCLfJSIONS SPECIFIC T4 TUE CON~k2F[i.ENSIVE PI..AN AmENDMr_iIVTS
A. COMPLIAN('EWI'I"N TfTLE 17 (CEVFRALPROVISiONS) nF '1'HE SPOKANL VALLE-YNTIlNIG(PpLCOlle
findings:
Section 17.$0.140(14) of the SVivIG provides approval critcria that musf bs cansidered v►ihen .the City amends ttie
Coinprehensive Plai. The crite'ria are listed bclow along wiE}i staff coriiments.
1. Tlic proposed aniendment bears a sub"stantial relationship to the piililic heatth, safety, Welfar.e, zuid
protection-,of the envi.ronment. ~
. ,
Slaff Rcport.and Recmnmcndatian to'the P(anning Commizinn,fnrCPA-07•O8
Puge 2 of3 . .
~ Staff Resaonse: The proposed amendments are minor in nature wifh a few excep:ions. Amendments to
Chapter 2, I.and Use include. text and policy clianges .that address future annex"ition areas for the City:
Tltese policies are the first step in the process of defining specife urban growth areas ror the City lo
provide sufficient area to accommodate the City's 20 year growt:h allocation as designated bv Spokane
County: Huture updates of the Com.prehec►sive f'lan will include updates to the Capifa_I facililies Plan tllat
will dernonstrate the City's abiiity toprovide urban senices to tihE future annexAtion areas:
2. The.proposetl amendment is consistent with the requiremeiits of Chapter 36:70A RCW'anil with the-poriion
of the City'-s adoptsd plan not-affected'by Clie ainendment.
StiafT'Respcr►se: Ths propnsed anenciments to the Comprehensive Pian are not in conflict with Chapter
36.70A RCW (Growth Management Act) and_do not resait in intemiLl inconsisxencies witilin the plan itself.
3.. The proposed amendinent responds fo a subslantial change in ctal~ditions beyond fhe pmperty otvner's,
control applicahle to fhe are,a wil'hin w}iioh the subject property- lies.
StaflFRespnnse: The prAposed text amendments are nof site or property specific: "1'his approval
criterion :does not a.pply.
4. The prooosed.smendinent corrects an Qb,'vious ma;ppin; error.
Staff Re.si o~ nse: The proposcd fext.ameqdments xk711 ncit.result in changes to specific properties.
5. The pibposed.ainenimentaddresse5 gin identifiecl defiaieiicy in tlie CompiehensivePlaii.-
~
StAff Response: TIZe majbrity 9f.the proposed cbde amendments either uptiate dr eorrec.t iiifot~nation
~.ontained in-tiie plan. As noted in above substaiitiive_policy changes are propnsed in Cliapter 2-Land
Use related to idenrii'yinb Fvbuie ar►nexation areas for tlie. Cify. A change.is.also propnsed,to ttie ~ity's
mtmicipal code to correct:.an. inconsist:ency behveen adopted comprehensive plan policies :aiid tha
perniitted use mat.rix.contairied in Appenclix 19,A.
Specifically, Policy 1:UP-9:2 states in part variety of hoit$ing :types including 4paiIn5cnts,
condominiums, town houses, [4vo=family and single'fam.ily dwellinss _on small Jots'•' should be ailowecl in
both the C.orridor.Miaed Use (CMU) and jv[ixed U.se Center (MUC) zcining districts. ApPendix 19-A
fails.to provide for batli tw.o-family, orsiogle faniily dwellings in eithor CMU or M[JC-districts. Staff is
recomane:ridina thAt Appendia 19-A be amended to addressihit.inco►lsistenc.y..
Conclusiun(s): '
'1 he propased Comprehensive Plan text amenclments and the,pmposed amendmenl to Appcndia 19-A (Schedule of
Periniirted and Acc.essory Uses} are consistent with tJie.4})orc►val criteria c;otitained in.tjie SVMC.
1V. S'I'AFF R.F..CUMIVLGNllATION '
The Planning Divisian aftcr review and-consideration ot the proposed amc,mdments and applicable.approval criteria
recommeads diat tFic Planniiig Go`►nmission-recommerid appcov.;l ot CPA.=49-48 thrpugh CI'A-15-08.
,.._a~___~ .._a ................n~~~„~ it, ihe [tnnnina Commissio-n fot Ct'A=07-0S
l
s
~
;
I
1
F
~
~
I
I
~
I
t
r
~
~
(
haon
pter 1 Introduct0 ~I
i
Y
;
1
~
k
'i
i
~
~
~
. j
,
. ;
~
,
;
~
I City of Spolcerse Veiley Comprehertsive PlanQhanter 1 Introduction
1.1 Comcretiensive Ptanning Eflort
Why Pfan?
Spokane Rtver
Spokane Valley ptans for people. People
need a sarfe and secure place to Ifve. an ' .
economy that pravides jobts, a transportatlon
system thet allaws them to get around,
schools, oalleges, and recnuitonal
opportuni4es. Ft is the cty govemmertYs
responsibirity to provide pubiic servirxs and
facliides, develop potkcies, and adopi
regulations bo gulde the growth of a c,fity that
I meel5 ihe f1@@ds Of ItS people. Fr:.^:
t~-th--rceEent.-;jhe guide tor
Spokane Valley's gnowth and devetaQment - wr
~ ka; t1 bsen the 4-4er+m-Comprehensive -
Rlan. Whfle the Plan guides 8roww and
devebpmertt in the City. It also provides a
plan for preservation of the natural
environment that is such an Important component of tlhe cammunity.
yyhat is a Compnehensive Plan?
The role of the SVCP ia to clearly stale our communit}r's vision for its future, and to artlculate a ptan for
aocompllshing tfits vision aver a 20-year period. The SVCP seeka to answer a numDer of questions:
. What areas are most suitaWe for developmetrt or redevelopment?
• What areas sFiouid be preserved in their natural state?
• Where should growth oocur?
. F{ow qn we manage that growtfi Lo realize our vislan for the cornmunity?
• How should we address our wrrent and future trartsportalion needs7
• How many parlcs do wm need, of what size, k(nd and where?
. What steps should we take bo enoeurage destrable ecanomic development?
• How cen we ensure an edequate supply af affioniabk housing for all income levels?
• What utifities and publlc services wNl we need?
• How wlll the community pay for ail tt►ese things7
Each of the SVCP chapbers addresses these questians, and mote, tn the areas af transportabon, tand
use, housing, capital fac(lities, economic deve{opment, utllities, and parks and recreabon. The answers
fortn the impiementation statements, which guide the achievement af those strategies. The
implementetion strategies within each chapter are used b guide the development of ne+nr tegulabons
and guideiines or revise exEsttng reguleWns. The SVCP also sets a deaf frameworlc for wfiere the
community wili need to sPend money on capital facil'rUes, how much, and identifies availab(e funding
s,ources, As a whole, the SVCP offers a flexible frameworic for Spokane Va11ey's future, allowing for
adaptation to changing conditions over tlme.
Requfremsnts of ttN (3rowth MansgemseR Act
The GMA (RCV1i 36.70A. 140) was passed by tlte Washir►gton State LegEslature in 1890, with
amendments added In 1991 and subsequent years. The leytslahure Rassed the GMA in recogniti~on of
the rate of growth that was occurring throughout the atate. The {egisiature was responding not only to
the rate of growth, but afso to tlie rype and bcation of growth.
~ AdoDied AQril 25 2006 Paqe 2o
( City ot Spokane Valley Gomprehenslve Ptan Chaater 1 IntrotLucfior
Two-thfrds of the siate's popukatian and household grawth in the 1980s took place in unincorporatec
areas, and produced sQrawiing subdivisions, cornmercial strips, and urbanfzation of land, which only teri
years betore, was rurel. ThEs rapid growth pattem resulted in inctnased traffic cflngesban and
inadequate publk services, and has threatened foresttand, agriculturel tand, and environmentally
sensltive areas such as wetlands. These impads heve been feft In the Spokane region, just as they
have beert In other parts of the state.
The GMA requires that each Jurisdiction produce a comprehensive pian tfiat contairts, et a minimum,
elements pertalning to land use, trartspottatlon, qpital tacilitles, economic developmertt, parks 8
recreadon, housing, and priwate utlllties. These elements must be consistent with one enother.
Jurisdkcfons also are requlred bo ad4pt paCides and reguWions protecting resource tands and cxitical
areas, such as agricuttural tand, wetfands, and hfllsldes. Eech ]urisdiction must cootdinate fts plan with
the plans of surrounding jurisdictions. Ttre GMP► atso requtres that each ctty desbgnate an urtian growth
~ brm~afy area (UGA). The UGA defines the area witfiin which the city anUcipatas it cou{d provide the
full range of urban ssrvioes at some tlme in the future. It also rspresents ihe area within which che ca#y
will cortslder annexatians and the boundary beyond whlch ft will not annex during tttis period
Perhaps what most distirtguEshes the GMA from previous planning statutes is tfie requiremen; that
pubtic senrices be availabfe or tunded at some designated level of servioe before development may
oc:cur. If a jurisdiction cannot provide senrices Uo an ares, then ft may nvt pertnit devebpment in that
area. This requirement is often referred to as "cancurrency.'
Development of countywide planning polic{es (CWPPs) is required by the GMA to ensure a coordlnatecf
and regbnal approach in the development of comprehensive plans. CWPPs provide an overo!i
iram8woric of polfciss within which each local governmant jurisdiciion will develap or update iGG
camprehertsive ptan. The policies slso gulde how )urlsdictifans should interact with one anuther
regarding spec(fic issues.
Developing the CWPPs was coordinated by the Steering Committee of Elected OfFicials which consists
of officlals from Spokane Caurtty and tts eleven cl6es and lowns (prior to lncorporadon of the cities of
Uberty Lake fn 2001 and Spakane Valley In 2003), atong with representatives from water, school and
fii,e dstricts, ublity oompanie.g and the pubiic. The St+eering Commltb-.- hati tfie difficutt task of balancing
oRen-conflicting ideas witb deweloping policies whlch provlde the greatest benzfit for Spakane Vallsy
and its citizens_ The CWPPs focused on the following areass:
1. Impiemenffition of Urban Growtti Areas (UGAs).
2. Promoblon of contiguous and orderly development of urban sc-rvic-s-t
3. S'tdng of oountywide or st~t=wiriP public capit;F;!
4. Parks and open space
5. Countywidetransportaiion riiCi
6. Cflnsldering the need foraffofdab{e housln,a 1;+ . 11 _-_I-T i,..r
7. Joint Counry and Ciry planning wMthin UGA_,
6. Countywide economlc devebpment and employ;,
9. Producing an analysis of the fiscal impact of GM,^,.
T)te SVCP is required to have tMernal consistency among u►e plan's various e1~rn~r,. also be ooordinated and consisient with the plans of adjacent jurisdictioRS. The
govemments to attempt eo resolve ooriflids through consultation and negaUation.
Perhaps the most tar reaching of the GMA impacts is the legal stahls it gives con-, j,
Priar to GMA, plans have largely been advisory and had less legal stending then regulations. Onca tha
Pfan is adopted, all new codes and programs subsequenUy adopted and implemented must be
corrsistent with it
How Wsa the Plan Developed?
~ Adooted AoN 25, 2006 Paae 3 a8
~ Cify ot Spoicane Velley Comprehensive Plan Chaeter 1 1ntrQdtlcbo~
developed a wastewater management plan that put Into motion oonstructbn af a sewer trunk line, end
sanitary sewer was provided to citizens af Spokane Valley.
~ Spokane Valiey is the seven largest cfty in Washingfion State. The incorporaton of Spokane
Valley Is the largest In the stabe and the second isrgest single inoorporation In U.S. history. The
I poputation at the dme of incorparabon was estknabed at 80,693. The April 1, 200Z5 poputation ts
esdmated st, 88.260 &544''1. Spokane Valley encomRasses approxirrtabely 38.5 squate mllas ot land
ar~ea. Spokane VaNey has an extensive retail tax base and is hane to several major auto dealenships
and the VaNey Mell which includes over 700,000 square feet of gross leaseabie fioor ar+ea. There are
an estimated a4.495 buslnesses In Spokane Valley as of December 31 2005 and estimated
I annuaf retaA sa{es !n 2006 of Sr 2 n0l'! OfAl 1,981.785.489.
Past Incorporatfon EAorts
Incorporeftn ot the Spokane Valley had bEen a topfc of discussion for several dECades The firsi study
of inoorporaBng the Valbey took ptaas in 1963 by the LegEslative Committee of tfie Spokane Valley
Chamber o1 Commerce. A study entiUed "Incorporatjon of a Cfty in the Spokane Va{leyr' written by
Willlam H. Roberts, Char{es Widc and J. R. Alley was re(eased In December 1983. Alttwugh a(ormal
vote on fncofporetlon did not take place at the tlcne, the issue af jncorporatbn ot the Vapey was being
promoted.
The first 5pokane VaNey incaporation efiott that led to s formal vote began In 1985. In Navember 1985
the Boundary Review Board o( Spokene CouMy (BRB) approved Bte proposal wiih rnodtfied
boundarles. Bekxe the IncorporaUon was piaced on the ballot, the BR8 decision was challenged In
Spokane County Supedor Court. After addMonal information vras considered, the BRB vohd ro deny
the praposal In December 1887.
In 1990, the City of Chiet Joseph tivas proposed in tfe Spokane Vailey. After four publc hearings, the
gRg t+eoommerxded denial of the proposed city (state !aw had been changetf and the 6RB oould not
cleny a propasal 'rf the poputatfon was aver 7,500). The incafporation was on the November balbt and
was only ab{e to gain support from 34 percent of tfia voters. State tsw requires that ffan incapoxation
vote taiis to get 40 peroent of tfie vote, the inoorporstion propoaal csnnot be brought back on the ballot
(or fhtee years.
In 1993, proponents of incorporatfon oonbnued thelr efforts and a petltfon to incorporate was fited with
tfte BRB. Afber ssvenal publfc hearings, the BRB 8gain teoofrunended deniai ot the PmP~'+ed
tnoorporation due b the larga amount af rural tand hyduded witfi(n the proposed city boundary. The
lpmposal n[ce again tai{ed but reoeived 44 petoent of 1he vote, vrhich errablsd inoorporatjon proponents
to bring the matter back writhout any tlme restrictions.
Spokane Valley looking south
Ir►spired by the 1993 vote, incorporation backers again initiated the incorparation process In 1995. The
matter was again defeated by the vobers In 1995, but did nxeive orrer 40 peroeM of the vote, which
enabied the proposal bD be brought badc the following year.
Immediatety afief the 1995 election, proposafs to incarporaCe fnre separate cities in the Spokane Valley
wae tOed wilh the oaxnty. Only two of the five pmposed cffies were certified by the county audiUar and
( Adoaied Acfril 25 2006 Paae 6 oA8
Chapter 2 - Land Use
~
~
Ci;y ot Spakene Valley Comprehenshre Plan
The GMA requlres that Comprehenslve Plan iand use elemenis include the following:
• Oesfgnate dtie proposed genetal distribution, lacatlon and extent of the uses of land for
houaing, commeroe, industry, recreadon, open spaces, public utllibes, public faclfides,
and other appropriate land uses;
• Populaflon denaitles, building intensltfas, and estlmates of future population gmvvch;
• Provide for protectbn of the quailty and quantity of eround water use for public water
supplies;
. Revlew drainage, flooding, and stormwaDer runoft in the erea and nearby Jurisdidions and
provide guidance for comectlve aciions to mtttgate or cleanse those discharges that
pollute water oi the state.
2.1.2 County Wide Planning PolkWs
The Counry Wide Pfannirtg Policles (CWPPs) requPred by GMA' provide a regional framework to
achleve the goals af the GMA. The CWPPs are a reflnement oi policy directlon contalned In the
GMA and are e resutt of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and
towns within the County.
The CWPPs provMe a policy framework for both the county and its respective cities. Adherence
to these policies ensures that plans within ihe county are consistent with ane another. These
policies address such issues as the deslgnatian of urban growth areas, land use, afforciabfe
housing, provision of urban services far future development, transportatbn, end contiguous and
orderty development The following are speciflc CWPPs that relate to the Land Use Element':
PoHcy Topic 1- Urban Growth Areas
Policies
1. Urban Growth Areas (l1GAs) are areas within which urtsan growth shall be encouraged and
ouiside of which growth can occur only ff It Is not urban In nature. Urban Growrth Areas
(UGAs) shall include ereas and densfties sutficient to permit the urban grawth that is
proJected to occur in the county for the succeeding 20-year period4.
'Urban growth` refers to growtii that makes intensive use of isnd for the location of
buiidings, structures end impermeable surfaces to such a degree as to be incompatible wfth
the primary use of such land fflr the groduction of tood, ather agricul;ural products or fiber,
ar the extraction of mineral resources .
llrban growth should be located firsi in areas already characterized by urban growth that
have exisdng publiC facllity and service capacifies to serve such development, and second
in areas aiready characterized by urban growth thet w111 be served by a combinetlon oi both
exlsting public facllities and services, end any addltional needed pubGc facflities and
serv9ces tfiat are pmvided by etther pubilc or pftate sourc8s. Further, it is appropriate that
urban govemment seNir.es be protirided by cities, and urban government services should
not be provfded In rural areae. Rurai aovemmen senrloes mav be arovlded In rurai aress.
HowBVer. Urban Growth ArM mav he estabiished Indeaendenl of Incoraorated areas
Wghi^ Ome Indeoendent Urban GrowM Areas rUGAs) Urban gpVBmmBntol SerYfCeS maY
2 RCW 36_70A210
3 Note M►eader The tollQwtno noJlcles are number+ed eccwrfirro to tt►e aollcv number !n the CWPPs.
resufdna !n rron,saauerrUa1 numberlnQ In thls documsnt,
, RCW 36.70A I 10
s RCW 36.70A.030(17)
9 RCW 38.10A.110(3)
Adapte! April 25, 2006 2 Chapter 2- Land Use
cWa be p.,,.ided bv oer than cltiea SQmeav reN on oonVacts frocn Spokane Courly
I for orovislon cf urban services.
Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) include all fands within exdsting citles, induding cfbes ln rural
areas.
UrbaAGFe,#
1~4444RfHafide4*1#b3r~-6FewAh-AFaas-( ~GA&~-Udsar: - ~ . , _ , - _ . : - = - _ . - ~ _ : . -
ty-$ths;-than 44~
9. W1thln Urban Grawth Areas (UGas), lands that fiall within planned high-capaci;y
transportatlon corridors shoufd be desEgnated tor sufflcient lntensity of land use to support
the economlc provis(on ot mulUmodal transportatlan.
11. Where applicable, comprehensive plans should contain land use pol(cies which provide
protection for the continued viabfltty of Fairchfld Air Force Base, Spokane Intema:ional
Airport, Felts Field, Deer Park Airport and other publlcly etivned airoorts within Spckane
CounEy
12. Jurisaictions shcufd work together ~u
Deyelopmen TBFt}to-Pre4"-nat, fat-e&OVf-~r
lapds c., it- #de-elpratect cdtical areas snti open space
within Urban Growth Areas (UGAs).
Policy Topic 2- Joint Planning within UGAs
PoliCies
1. The joint planning process shouid•
a Inciude all jurisdictions adJacent to the Urban Growtii Area and Speclal Purpose
Olstrfcts that will be sffected by the eventuat transference of gavemmental servfces;
b Recagnize that Urban Growth Areas are potential annexation ereas for cities;
c. Ensure a smooth transition of services amongst exist(ng municipalities and emerging
communfties;
d. Ensure the ability ta expand urban govemmental services and svofd land use barne-s
to expanslon; and
C. Resatve issues regarding how zoning, subdivisien and other lend use apptovals in
designated Joint p!anning areas wlll be caordlnated.
2. Jofnt pianning may be accamplished pursuant ta an interlocal agreement entefeJ into
between and/ar among Jurlsdictfons andlor specisl purpose districts.
Pollcy Topic 3- Promotlon oi Contiguous and Orderly Development and Prorisicn oi
Urban Services
PoliciF =
r'J. A11 j1Jf15UiCiiGrIS ShaII CQvtUUrICte Fiaf~S if-,di C~aSS~iy', de:5igilclc d~i~ . . _ . . _ . ~
lands and criticei areas.
7. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall include, at a minimun -i,
address edequate flre protecUon:
a. Limit growth to areas served by a flre protecGon distdct or w{thfn the corparate limlts
of a cky providing its own flre department.
b. Commercial and residenUal subdivislons and developments and residentfal pienne--!
unit developments shall Inciude the provision for road access adequate tor residenLs
fire department or disVict Ingress/egress, and water supply for flre pratectEon.
Adopted Aprit 25, 2003 3 Chapter 2- Land !
City of Spokane VaIley Comprehtnsive Pian
Cantamination o( an aquifer by contaminated surface water can lead tQ serious health concerns
and/or expenshre Veatment requirements. To address this cancem and lmpacts of new
development, the City has adopted a Stormwater Management Pian. The plan speciRes act(ons
to ensure water, quallty (nGuding the development of detentionlretention fadlitles to control rete
and qualiry of water runoifi. Furthertnore, development of a weilhead protection program with the
varieus water providets should pravide guldeifnes to avald possible contamination.
Paiides oontained In dhe Natural Environment chapter provide diredion for devebpment near
wellheads and in aquifer recharge areas. For a camptete discussiQn of water resources and water
purveyors in the City oi Spokane Vallsy, refer to the Capital Facilities chapter.
2.3.3 Parks and Open Space
One of the most Important and valued elements of a high quality living and working envlronment
is a parks and open space eystem. Praviding parics and open spaces oontributes to a raduction
in environmentel impacts such as notse and alr poilutlon; increases the value of adjaoent
properties; provides areas for passtve and sctive recreation; and helps preserve the natural
beauty of trte City.
2.3.4 Natural Environment
Spokane Valley's natural beauty is apparent, Streams, wetlands, surrounding mountsins and the
Spokane River provide a scenlc backdrop as well as a saurce 1`or acttve and passive recreation
for Uhe cwzens of Spokane Valley. The Land Use chapter seeks to protect Spokane Valley's
unique natural resources through policles that eupport the presen►aNon of these areas for future
generatlons. The Na#ura! Environment chapter also inciudes a discussian oi crftical areas as
defined by GMA For a oamplete dfscussion, please refat to the Natural Environment chapter.
2.3.6 Housing
Housing is a basiC human need and a major factar in the quality of lite for Indtvktuals and femllles.
An adequaie supply of affordable, attracbve, and funcdonal housing fs fundamental to achfeving a
senae of community. The central issue related to land use ls supplying enough land to
axammodate projected growth for a range of incomes and househo!ds. Prgsentiy, housing is
provided primarily in single-family subdivisions.
This plan sets forth strategies ta lncrease housing options and choices. The Land Use chapter
advocates changes to current development oodes to lncrease fiexibiiity in platting land and
encourage heusing as part of
mtxed•use dsvetapments In
commercial areas. The latter CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
provides an opportunlty to (ocate POPULATION ESTIMATES
housing Goser to employment and '
shopping, end tfl create affordable 156.c~o
housing. A compiete discuss{on o1
housing cen be found in the ~
Housing chapter.
~ zo,ooo ~
2A Pate~ttia) Annexetlon Ar~~ ~~o~
p~eleate~- 6fr>+rt# -a
cti~ t00.000 -
2.4.1 ProjedQd (3rowth 9D,WO
ao,ooo , . I n October 2003, the City+ af
Spokane Valley rec;efved a 2000 Q~ R~ 4► 4s ~b 'o ';P 'it
populaUan certiflcaUon from the
U.S. Census Bureau that indicated -Povut"": Adug'E'tWig'
80,927 people called Spokane -PopuMlan Estfmda 1.5% Growth Rab
Vailey home on Aprii 1, 2000. As ot _rp„mom E5*A16W i.M ama Ra.
Apnl 1, 2003 the populatlon had
Adopted April 25, 2006 g Chapter 2- LEnd Use
Clty af Spoicana Va(ley Comprehertsnre Plan
grown to 82,005 (based on the Washington State Office of Finenclal Management (OF""
population estimates). Upon fncorporatlon on March 31, 2003, the City of Spokane Va'
became the state's ninth largest city and second largest in Spokane County.
Spokane Veiley recefved en OFM populaflon estimate far Aprii 1, 2004 of 83,950. Thls r~..:
poputation esdmate moved Spokane Valiey irom the state's ninth largest c)ty to the state's e(ghth
largest city. The 2004 population esUmate reflects an annual fncrease of ayproAmabetv ~?•4
percent over the ctty's 2003 poaulation estlmate. The mast recwt OFM eatimate for Sookane
Yallev is 86,260 as of Aarfi 1 2007 This fiaure recresents an annual growth rate of
eipproximatelv 1 5 percen The average annual erowth rate is anproximatatv 1 9196 over the 4
year ceriod from 2003 to 2007.
Future populatbn growth is farecasted at the state and county level by OFM. Thls future
populafion growth was dtstributed between Jurisdictions and un(ncorporated Spokane Counry
through a methodology prepared by the Spokane County Steedng Commlttee of Elect$d Officlais
(SCEO). The City of Spokane Valley was not allocated papulation growth orig(nally because the
City had not been Incorporated when thls adion took place. However, the County did allocate
population to the "Spokane Valley IUGA', which Includes the new citles of Spokane Valfey En,-i
Liberty Lake.
This process resulted In a population growth allocaUon of 39,431 to the Spokane Vailey IUC:.L.
This IUGA aiso inciudes areas wiihfn the UGA that are still In unfncorporatcd Spokane Cour,yThe graph a-tove :Vatiey's 20 ye.:F~_,aula' cn u~~r~ra a; 1
_ ~n:J
growth rote
Using the 1r Uriri,a' ar~~~;tn i~
Spokane Valley area, the estima:ed 2025 populaGan oi Spokane Valley Js 114,7165 or an in;.reas e
of 30,815 persons. ThA 2.59'o annuai growth rate results In a 2025 populabon of 141,011, L:r,
increase of 57,061.
Spokane Valley proposed e populadon allocatlon of 20,666 to the SCEO based on tFte regioriLi
land capac)ty methaiology. Thls request was proposed as an 'interim" request based on the
lendlpopulation capaclty wlthin the exis#ing carporata boundaries of Spokane Valley. The reason
for this request was taased on Uhe significant Issues related to waste water treatment capacity.
Once the waste water issues have been resolved, Spokane VaUey will prepare a rev(slon to the
populatlon sllocation and present thls infortnation to the SCEO. This issue is discussed in morE
~ detaii below. The Spokane County Board of County ComrnEssioners (BoCC) approved tr -
populatEon allocation in November 2004.
The City has continued to rafine the populaNon projections based on the preceding lnformati At a City Council reireat held on February 11, 2008, the City Council direcied staff to uti{ize
1,89% annual growth rata for purposes of populabon forecasting. Thls resulted in a 20 ye2r
populstfon foracast of 38,614 persons. Thls fnformation was presented to the SCEO on Fe6ruary
15, 2006 when the City otficially reque5ted a 20 year populatlon al{ocation of 3$,614 for planning
I purposes. In 2008 the BoCC eoaroved via Resolutbn 06-0438 a naoulatlon stlocatlon of 33,125
for Spokene ValleY f4r planning pUrvom.
2A.2 Land Capactry Analysia
The GMA does not require a Population and Land Capeciry Element to be inciuded In the
comprehenslve plan. However, GMA daes require that Land Use, Housing and Capltal Faoi(ities
Elements include populatfon densitias, building Intenslties and estlmates of future population
growth. The GMA also requires a Land Capar.ity Anetysis, or the theoretical hoiding capactty of
the designated Urban Growth Areas, wh9ch by definibon includes cities. By assigning the
expecbad papulatlon growth to the results of the Land Capadty Analysis, the area required to
acoommodate the papuiatlon growth is shapECi.
Countywide population farecasts are identifled by the CWPPs, as one criterlon for cansitieratfon
In developing a regional methodology or countywide population ailocation. The countyw{de
growth target ls based an the OFM growth management population forecast br Spokane County. ~
Adopted April 25, 2006 10 Chapter 2- Land Use i
City of Spokane VaUoy Comprehenslve Plan
wiihin the existing city limits of each city. The ratlonale for this recommendstjon waa based on
the situation regarding sanltary s$wer throughout the entlre Spokane region,
It !s estlmated that the Spokane County treatment plant wfil run aut of capacity In 2009, and tie
Llberty Lake Water 8 Sewer DisVict treatrnent capabii'rty is currentiy at or naar capacity. Permits
to expand the Spokane Courtty and Liberty Lake plants from the Washington State Department of
Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency are currently in doubt Gtven the potential
constraint for botfi Jurisdictlona to provide this vitel urban servlce, t#tie Steering Cornmittee
forwarded a reoommendetion to the Spokane County Board of Counry Commissloners to allocate
anly the population that cauld be eccommodated within exisbng city limits untll such tlme as the
sanltary sewer issues are resolved.
2 I.3 Pobnt~al Anne~at~on Aress
The p..•~""~• rt,~ r~1nn is IdentiN ths u^.!^^ormnatgd areas wlthl~l t~1e u1stlna SDOkanQ
GA R o~ kane gallow lc wau m+ise n I
annexadon areas for the Ciri. •"a^ 2.2 indicotes ootenfial annexation sreas ()AAsI for the Citv of
Mkane ValleY,
S kane un adopW its fira com nsiv n develoo-W r GMA n 2001, A
!e e min n af urban s ces uired at th m th rnun!Ly bli
q reoyef ka Caunt s ob1' aisd m I vAth e Envi men I Policy
Act The Counttt's dan included the deslQnation 01 a realunal UGA whlcfi included e still
unmcoroorated area ai ~ kane Vaqev The Counubl¢ed the SEPA/GMA Intenrahon proc~
o iulfiil th$ envir nme tal rev►ew requireme-n ts o ludi dMnaAed ~GA
When Ubertv e incoMgrated In 2001 $nd SnokaneVallev {ncaruarated ln 2003 much of the
"Vaile UGA' in ded as vart ot ed ell. n 2003 nd ain in
2006, ,Llberty lake completed annexatia^s totalinQ 975.69 acres of the Co~n desianated
T;,m ar►nexetio~s resuited in a arfv 34 peroetlt (ncrease (from 45 sauare mues to iust vvCr o
gnuare rt~lles) in land area (or Libertv Leks.
61 T bie 2.1 fndicates there are a number aF unincorxtQrated U4As adia~ent to nokene Vallev.
Several of ese UGAs ere Qnlv conaQuous to Saoka VaIlev (south southessl_ d no ast
~nd u!d be lo~ical areas for future annexation to th C i V I!e . Sp-okane C n
nd the rt~etro citleg of Seo~cane Vall Y Saokane Ut~eftv Lake and AlrwaY Heiahts have Qun
the Aroc-ess of uQClati he regional UGA cQnststent with the vounht wlde olanninci ll es
(GWPPs), Thrauah thls aro~ t1~e G~ of S~kane Vallev w111 (det~trfv areas nexgded to
.2uentitv anelYSls d u n
mmodate aUocated aooufaN4n arowth bv re-Avaluatina land a
6eivk~ deliverY=
2.6 Land Use Oe$1 an8
The tand use designations in the SVCP
recognize the relatbnships bsmeen broad
patiems of land uses. The deslgnabans set
torth locational criterie for each speciflc
class of uses aonsistent with the long-tem', obJsCaves ot the SVCP. ThasE
designations provide the purpose and lnten: _
for specific zaning dlstricis. The Iocatlan o` :`j,~ ~ .
the comprehenstve plan Isnd use
designatlons are shown on thc _ -
Comprehensive Plan Lsnd Use Map (Map . rs,~
2.1).
2.5.1 Rssidential
• r '
The demand for and deve{apment of singie-
family housing is expected to continue fo~ ~ • '
the fareseeable future. Single-tamily deve~ r: 'I accur as in-f!! d:.veiopment af vacant or
Adopted Aprfl 25, 2006 12 Chapter 2- Land Use
, . -.i . - . . . _ . . . '
SupporUOppositlon to Development ot Small Commerclal Centers Close to Residential
Nelghborhooda
Respandents' opinions (gtaph 100%
~ t.t4aw dght) regarding the ■ 1=396
development of smail commeroial $0%
centers close to residentiaal
ne(ghbofioods, were also sharpty s(%
divided. Just under half of the
respondents (489b) were 40%
supportive of developing smal( 21% 15%
commercial centers close co 20%
rasidenttal neighborhoods. W*N
% '
0
Strongly Somevrttiat NesAral Somewhat Strongty
oppose oppose support SvPPort
Priority Level: Stronger
ControFs on Signs and 10D%
Blllboards In Spokane Va{ley ~ ~-398
Oplnfons regarding the priority $0%
City officials should place on
stronger sign and b(fiboard
contrais wera very mixed 60%
However. 67% of respondente- 33% 34% 33%
lndicated that Spokane Va{ley 40% ~
officiais sfiould place a medium ~
or htgh prfority on stronger slgn ~a~o
anG billboard control end as I
such, it ts probable that the
majorlty of residents would be Q% supportive of stronger billbaard
control and sign regulations LpW Pdodty Medium priority Hlgh priorlty I
.
2.10.3 Results of "Unscientffk" Survey
During the cammunity meetings held on the comprehensive pian, city stafi made avaftable the
suNey questions cantafned in the Wty's community survey. MesUng attendees wsre asked to
camplete the survey and either return lt before the end of the meeting, or to complete the survey
at home and mall (t to the city. ln many cases the responses to the questions were similar to the
responses of ttte formal survey conducted by Clearwater Research. These question numbers are
right of the survey itself. The follawing are the resuits of the "unsaentffic' aurvey:
Adapted April 25, 2006 26 Chapter 2- Land Uss
City ol Spakane Valley Camprehenslve Ptan
LUP-6.11 Provide en effiectlve transitian beNveen the periphery of the City Center and
nearby lower density residential develapment
Goai
Lyg-j Provlde a aalanced trar►aportatlon network that accommodates public
transportation, hlgh occupancy vehic{es, pedestrians, blcyciists,
automobllea and Integrated parcln8•
PoUcles
LUR7.1 Improve traffic drcuEation around end through the Ciry Center by extending the
streat network and creatlng smalisr blocks.
LUP 7.2 Enoourege pedestrfan and bicycle clrculatlon by providing public sidewaiks,
sVeet trees, street furniture and other amenitles.
LUP-7.3 Require deer and sate pedestrtan paths to enhance the pedes!rian network.
LUP•7.4 Connect the maln entry of buildings to pubiic sidewefks by an fdentifiable
wa!lcway.
LUP-7.5 Aliow for on-street parking on the intemai City Center street network
LUP-7.6 Ericourage translt use by improving pedestrian and bicyc3e Ifnkages to the
exlsting and future transit system.
Otiice Cioals 8 Policles
Goal
LU(34 Create approprlate development standards tor Office deslenated area6.
Policies
LUp_6.1 qlloyv commerclal, residential snd rocreational uses in conjuncton with permitted
uses in Office designated areas.
LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike tanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to
provfde a sata and attract(ve working envfronment
Mixed•use Goais 8 Policies
Goal
LUG- Encourage the development of Mlxed-uae areas that (oster community
Identity and are deslgnQd to eupport pedestrian, bicycle and regional
ttansft.
Palicies
LUP-9.1 The charactedstkes of a Mlxed-use area shoutd inGude:
• Housing and emplayment densitles ta support reglonal transtt service;
• Publkc transit cannections;
• Safe, atfradive translt stops and pedestrian end blcycle ways;
. Buildings that front on wlde sidewalks with attracfive landscaping, benches
end frequent bus staps;
• Muiti-story bugdings oriented to the street rather tfien parking bts; and
. Parking spaoe located behind or to the side of bufidings or in parking
structures.
AdopEed Apnl 25, 2006 33 Chapter 2- Land Use
LUP-17.3 The City should continue coordinated planning eftarw Ge;waen 5pokare i:ou~ ~
appropriate flre di5tricis, school dlstricts end tivc??r SEN1C8 orovidFrs to ass~
managed growth in urban growth are
OtC gttci POIiCi.
Goa I
► ~ ~ _ ~ , _ c _ _ - ' ~ - -
f•-
LVP 16 ) V1jlUllf113i6 0hlstirlq urIIan qrowttti cifCa idd(lllty UUtalltial ciiilt•>:8t!Gri c`;fL3s afC
G0nti4UOUS t0 Ule CitN lIIFIItS BId f)Ot 8niCf16d t4 St101h@f Gtty_
l.UP 182 Coordinate wiih ediacent dWes and Sookane CQUntv tQ rv►elv and update the
,eafoca I urban orowth area boundarv cwststent wfth the Countvwid Plannlna
Pondes a Rcw 36.70.
LUP 18 3 P(oQM chanQes tq the reaional urban arowth area boundarv necessarv co
oxommodete Saolcane V Uev's ZO vear oooulaOon etiaotion.
LUP 18 4 The Cifiy wiil not aocsot reaueM to annex unlncor2ora teRftonr low-ted
outside the deskmaW urban atawth ares
LUP i8.5 Pursue intertocaf aareements with Saokane CounN that wouid orovide far
callaborative toint alannina within ootentiel annexaGon ereas-
LUP 18.6 ComDtete neoessarv GaDitai facllities Dlanninq for anv ~ewiv prOdOSnd urban
orowtl) arcas In -iccordarce with the Countywide_Plannfna Polfcles
Adopted April 25, 2006 37 Chapter 2- Land Use
Sch*duJie o! ~ Y • ~
PiERtttlmA !.lmts RN.esno. Caadgnom
'
oc n a:
O O O 81 614 ~~~ing' eccesawxy
apartmonts ISVMC 18.40.100
Bt 814 DwelUnO, CaroWkea O o O
reaidenoe SIIAAC 19.80.06((t)
• • 72 7213 Dweltlnp, Conqragts • • • • •
• • • • 81 814 OwNfi , Ouplmc • •
• • • 81 814 DweWnp, MultHm!(y • ~ • O 4 SVMC 19.80.020(2)
• ~ • • • 0 a1 814 DwaWnp, skpla lamOy • • O 4 SVmC 19.811020(2)
• • 0 81 814 DmOnq. Townhouse • • • •
.rr.~M~rir~~r~..~rY~~i•~~.w~ ' ' ' _ ' ' ' _ , " .
ow1'fNMOKI *--gll -paQ ~-tC !
~.rw.~+.~r.r~I4A■~w~4rr ~ , I ' '~i
^irw~1/►Awr~~lwsiT^I~"~~~' s~'[ , t ~ L ~
-i25N~~
Mylqrrarwr~.■~.~.1M~Ri wU~ ~ ~ r7l ~ i:.i1 ~er~ ~ I I .••.`1~' ' 1e
NIO'1 t 1 Ce 0
1 ' 1r~ ~~fl Y.. l - '
~ ~ ~ ~ -~t , ~•'~"Y ~ r`~ ~
• • / ~ I ~ l ~ ~
~ NfdYi Mw\
, l , I ~ L~ ~ ~~l . • -
1 .'-~.-i-__•._~ ~
Lo-rvo
,
~ - • i ,i ~ ~ ~ •~1~~ 1 i I J.7
IR.
t• _ E~ _
- i
-t' tu-
~ ~-~.f ~ ~ _ t-- 7 ~ _ - ~ ~ k,- ~ ~ ~r - _
~n-
~ ` ' •L y- . `M~t ~ 1 ~..'L , .i I r~ . ~ ~
'F
•w~r~oon"nMr~n .JLI : ~ •~ti
~loo11 - t -Aj I • ~ i , ( i i , , ~
.~4 ~ ' ' i` ♦ ~t I ~ t b ~~i sr
~+!~*~rlwo ~ h` - • 4 ^---ti ~ `Ti i~'"~ r • ' ,
~
AWAMN"iP,ID a JAj -
••~►wrrrw~+~ ~ ~ i ~ ^ ~ , { luia' '
~ ,T ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ►.r„~ ~ ~ ~j ~ ..on6M9!~S,
~ ► _ r - , R ~ i" ~ ' -
t. I ~ ,....ry ~ -1!~ 11
SOIDjv Qo:lOJ~aQUV - - - .t- •aarf~ .~t~ 1r,~ ' ' ~ 1 ` - 1 ~
~ •~~R ~ . ~ t~ -t
'ra;ua;od '~r ~t~~i " • ' ` , rri~ - ~ A f ♦ S . CML _
~
z-zdaN - - - -
Chapte r3 ~ °Transpor°tation
F?I'.f' I'7,^.c.n.n'•_
• b~:C.. ..I_':_ ,_i . . , , , : . . . _ . . . .
purposes, e.g., to get to the siore or to visit fnends, but prelter to svoid roads with fast t~L
mator vehicle traffic unless there ts ample roadway width to allow easy overtaking by fas'c -
motar vehictes. Thus, baslc rlders are comfartabie dding on a ne(ghborhood street and sha~,,
use paths and prefer designated faciHUes such as bike lanes or wide curb lanes on bus.- -
streets.
• Children ridfng on their own or with thelr parents, may not travel aa fast as their aci.:
counterparts but still require access to key desUnsttons in their commuNty, such as schoois,
convenlence stores, and recreatfonal facllities. ResidenNal streets with low motor vehic!e
, well-defined bike lanes or shaned used paths can ~:i.~ ~~o rrn-
speeds
encouraging them to ride in the travel lane of the bus~,
The following tarms deflne different types of bicycle facilities
• Shared-use Path: Facilities on eDarated rioht-oi-w.i ;
vehicles. Minimum width af 6 feet A-bik"ay p#y6lFenaFaiiW-~~
• ' Wi~{=! =
highway
YAth;n
i.~~. =~:~-vF?-c:~~~ ~..=.:y:_._C1:-~•cj'r:._L~Ti~-
Shared-use paths msy also be used by pedestrians. skaters,
wheelchair users, joggers and other non-matorized users.
• Bike Lanes: A portion oi a roadway which has been dssignated by strlping, signing and
I pevement markEngs for the preferential or excluslve use of bicycllsts. Mfnfmum at b feet with
an eddltional 64nch stripe. 8icycle lanes improve conditions for cyGists of all abllltles withln a
glven coRldor and encourage increased bicycle use by provid(ng a greater degree of camfort
and percehved safety for less skil{ed cyclists.
• Signed Shilred Roadway Slaned lan allowlna both vehlcubr treffic and blcvde traffic.
Mlnfmum of 14 feet in wjdth.
. g red RQadway: La Uowi both vehicula traffic nd bf le trefflc. Outslde or curb
lane minlmum of 14 fesG
•
.
~
•L'~t~ ' . _ .
~ _ . . . - _ ' , _ . . _ _ _ _ . _
iwW
. r o a~S@ 6 r, E ii_
la -riYltt`•. . I . _ _ r r - _ ~ I ~ ~ _ ~ _ ` , .
' 1@O'
1~1~p 3? i1us're+.es thF Bike:'Pedestrfan
° The Ametlcan Assac~atbn o! State Hlghwsy and Tranaporietlon O~cials {AA`~,H i"s ~ n:; r„ r,::, ;-c.,:
t
Fadlties and the Washitqton S'tala Depenment otTransportatfon (YVSDOT) t= Adopted Apri' 25, 2006 (Updated 424r4)0;rT04-07-2008)
Page 17 of 35
City e! Spakane VaUey Comprehenslve Plan - Chapter 3 Transportation
TP-9.8 Reduce obstructions and conflicts between bicycieJpedesirian facilities and vehicular
transporiatlon routas.
TP-9.10 Develop sVeet, pedestrian path and bike path standards that conVibute to a sy6tem
of fuily connected routes.
jp 911 Future ulannina should Include an (nteurated Bicvda Master Plan that daftnes the
goals and desian elements br bicvclina facilities In the Cihr.
TP 912 The desian of intersections and interchames shall a=- mmadate btGVCiists ewnd
pedestrians (n a manner that ts safe accessible and convenient
TP 913 The CiN will work with CTR Prograrn to orovlde Inontive amurams and develop
faciNties to encoureae empiovees t4 alcvcle to wotk.
Transit Goafs b Pollcles
Goal TG-10 Support the provision ot a safe, efflcient and cost-efiectlve public transportaUon
syatem.
Ooal TG-11 Encourage land uses that wili aupport a high-capacFty transportation system.
Poiicies
TP-11.1 Ensure th2t street standards, land uaes and building placement support the faciiities
and services needed along transit routes to malce transit vlable.
TP-11.2 Wofk with STA to ensure that translt shelters, bus benches and other amenities that
support trensit use are provided (n appropriate iocations for users of the systern.
TP-11.3 Support the continued planning and deve{opment ot a high-cepacity transit systEm.
TP-11.4 Work with STA tn planning and developing bus puI{-out bays on the far side af
tnteraections.
TP-11.5 Nelghborhoa) businesses sreas should be served by transit consistent with the
Tran6portaban Element
TP-11.6 Ensure the Appteway 8ou{evard right of way is the minimum width necessary to
accommodate future street and high capacltyr transit improvements.
Avlatlon Goals 8 Policies
Goal TC342 Support the expanslon oi general avlaNon and trelght uses at Feice Fleld in
accordance wtth the approved AtrpoK Master Pien.
Pollcles
TP-12.1 Enoourage the fuil development and utltizat{on of airport praperties at Felts Field.
TP•122 Encourage oammerciat, educadonal and logtsticel support Industry In Gose proxfmity to
che afrport.
Goal TC3-13 Encourage land use and development campattbte wkh alrport uses and regulsted
alrapace.
Palicfes
TP-13.1 Enforce regulations pratecting alrspece hom encroachment.
TP-13.2 Dlscourage fncampatible land uses artd rasidendel densities adjacent to the airport.
Rall Goals b Pollcies
Goal TG44 8upport and encourage the contlnued vfablllty of the passenger and fretght rafl
system In the reglon.
~ Adopted April 25, 2006 (Updated _12 =R-2a:.~7-2008)
Page 29 of 30
~ ees 1~ I
~ ~ ~"►-1 --~i ~ Mnp 3.2
~ Bike 8nd Pedestrian
t ~
`~p ~ ~ ` " Sy4t~~
~ , ~ ' ~
~
, r _ ,
r d ' Legcnd
Cit ~f - ~ . ~
6paludc ~ ..a~ , A; ~ . ~ r r.~ , . . . . .
o~w.~Ai+K«~y ~..+w~ I~ a i'^~ ,1- - ~ ~S ~ I Y~i~dCl~w~flsM~r
~ T r..~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ = d~ .,1.-T t~ I ` i ar ~ ' l - - . . . . hM~.dfA.edtlwtuh
..4 + ~i~~ u' 'nil 'rsz ~ ~ Gw.w.i l J~ L..t~
1~~~~ L ~ ~ i. ~'5~.~' ~ - '1~~ ~.,1 Q~Sitl~6~sta
i
~-j* ! ~ ~ . .I. ~ f Q.[~ ~ - ~ _ ' . ~ . .
" -i-7 IYqrrl ~i1~ 6r
1. I - • - ~ . .ti,. : ,
f , ~It...~.1 Y • • ' - - • ~ L, ~ s~.rr se.d w+.n
~
_ u~:: . , _
- ~ ' - - ~ ` • ~f. hi ,j, - x .j,~• ~ LT~Aa lorM+t
1' - ~
* - _ ' ' f L '
I r ' ~.1~~ ' ~ I T j ..1 , _ ` i •~1~ ' r ~ ti.~ . . .,v _ j'~ lJte ~ f~ir hA
~ I.-, I ~ i -I j ~ - ~ ~ y ~ A ~ . r . . . . Aqad M~tr~ M6
. ~ ~ -
" ~ _ ~ . - m Tnill..r
- • 1. ~ ,
~ ~ ' ~ t~n.~r vo
M ~^I
• ~~I ~ ~ . 'jy-- I ~ ~ _ h ~ I . • y ~j~ -
'i ~ ~11 ~~..1. •Z.~ ,•~,~j •l:..~. 1m.i
i=1 -i~ - ;.r,. ."7=.~:• - .z ~w . . -t -4~ 1 ~ e.w.r
_ ~ ~~i~ i. . - - . . ~ ~ ~ ~ o~e.►s..~.rr+~.
I t 1 0
ic ~ - . L~. 1 ~,(j~ - ~
-.r'~ ' ~ ; ~~~NC,~_ ` ~ -r-"'I'! I• - T~ ~ t CUy~flpst~wv~Un
/l i ~ ~ ~tn
~ ~ 'pi.~ ..~i~~. ~ i' 1 i~~ ~~..i- ir~ .,a' - 1~5~rCi~rl4w
r fli_ • ~ ,f ~~p~~, ` ~ r N ~1 _ ~ .f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tu~~
n' _ -f~ ~
L T~ 1'~~! r-'-~ '~t 11r`w~~ ~~iw,e,~C--~ :-1 1
I ~ l i - - sy~rc ~rtr+i~-~+ i~ . .
. ~ f, . . ~ A'pr ~oi~
~j ' ~ i` ~ I - ~ ~ _ - I41r~ F~~ ' 1 ~ II.
j 'r~~' t -
~ ~ , yl / /1~~ _ ' -i . .L'U ~
~t ~.`°~l~ ~ J'!at-`~-~ ~~i. ' i;'' ~ t~ 4,' `'}e',t~ i
~~f ~ ~ K 'f,-~ j'.1 _ ~4----u! .~1~_ _
i ~ • , ~ ' v
~ S3'4rl.~ f ~~I_ _y_.. ~
►
j ~ J y~~ 1
~ , ~~uaV'G t
~ ~ 1 + Mw ~RqIN . 0
~
.
. , ~ ~ ~
~
- - ~ « Tf~J
_ ~'~4y~i~~ • n~ ~
` / ` ~ ~ ^ ; , i ~ M • ~ ~~f~ / I ♦ • ~ 1 • 1 ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~l . lrr~. flr~~i~rw~~Y~M~Tifi~~~
~•y'l-. r'v^-' ' ~ arv~/Y~~~~~~w~ra ilrhr~~si~
I ~G I r~~~Wrr~/~~►~Y~I~d
. 7 ~ ~ Trw r~ Yi!'/~' w~~..d~~. ~ r rr~
+ ~ ~w ~ . •,i. I
,'1_ ;;j~•~'~ i ~ f ~ R..~~~~~r~~rr~d4+~~~c~~
t _ _ ' . ~ I n.,,,r,~~rr~„~,~ ~wrrr..i nw~•tw~a
~_'1L - _ ~ r' ~ w.....~ n. ~w.r...r~...~ r..~. w~.r.
i
i
~
S ~"~OUSll1
Chaptehr g
City of Spokane VaUey Comprahensive Plan
TsbM 6.1 2000 H.U.O. incam lfwls bY liasehold Slts
rPWsoos PK HouseNold 1 2 ZV 3 4 ~
Affordab6e Rent $762 S874 5883 $995 $1.063
APfordabte Housn Prkes"" $81,439 S704.821 3105,938 5118,202 $131,204 (
MaQtan tncama (100'X. ot rtisc5an) $38,100 $43.875 5+18,483 348,251 $54,W i
Aftniable Hou" parytent» S794 $910 $968 $1,025 E1,139 '
Afiwdebb ReM sgg2 $1.092 $1.162 $7,231 51,367
qffprdable f{puse prlce,o"" $114,299 5131.025 $139,369 E147,752 $184.005
LlpPer Income (1204i) S45,720 $52.410 $55.756 $58,101 S65.8Q2 ~
Aftedabb youae payment-« 5952 51,092 $1,162 31,231 $1.367
q}brdaple Rtrrt $1.143 $1,310 $1,394 51.478 b1,640
q{ip~~ House pricea"" $137.159 $157.231 $187.267 $177,303 ;198.80F
Sourae: 2000 Cansus fiquroe icx Spokana County msdtan femHy Inoane and paroentegs calculatlon.
• average spcxane counry Housenoa u 2.48 parsons. Approxlmates the meeAan far aA hanMoids tn the
oourtqr.
Bacauea d the wey HUD cWcu{atea thb income level, t is adualy 767G of Me medan income rather Man
BO% aRt►ough RIs caCed 1.80.
An afFardabla houshp payment ia 25'h ot +nontrily Income, P.I.T.I. A'!ofdable rent and utilltirs Fs 30''- `
monthly incane
HQU51f1g 1fl IIiE Spokane area is GUfil~.~:ii aii'Je'I f 3il0fdablt, ~ili+lGUqli GU::t u;
has shown significant incxeases reoeritly. in 2000, the merlian single family home in
Spokane County was $113,200, rising to $4-2-&;56599191.600 in J-uqe-240the thirci quarter
of 200$161. The averanE home price h-,is aiso risen tr, $168,700, up 21.50I, irom the fourtn
quarter of 2004'
Tabie 6.2 Washington Caunties - Fourth Duaner 2005
MedlBtr Mott9ape MonttY hAedfan Houafrtiy Medisn
prioe RaM PaymsM FsrnHy ANord"ry Househoki
inc.ortte Index (FiN) Irticome
Spokene $168,700 5.6396 S638 $53,827 135.5 $42,001
WasltMgtpn $275.700 5.83 $1,118 568.130 98.0 $41,244'
Soutce: Washington Center tor Real Estste Researdt, Fstlmates, Fourtlt Quarier 2005
OFM E6tffT18f8. OGtqbBf 2W5
The Housing Affordability Index measures the ability of a middie inc:ome famiiy to carry
the mortgage payments on a median price home. When the index is 100, there is a
balance betwesn the famity's ability► to pay and the oost. Higher lndexes indicate housing
is more affordable. All loans are assumed to be 30 year loans. it is assumed 25% of
income can be used for principal and interest payments. Figure 5.4 compares housjng
affoniability in Spokane Gouniy with the State of Washington for each quarter, beginning
with the second quarter af 2002.
" Wastiigton CeMer for Real Estate ReseatCh, 4'" Ouarter 20Q5.
Adopted April 25, 2006 7 Chapter 5- Housing
Ciry of Spokane Valley ComprEhensive Ptan
- - - ~
Rguro 5A Fious ing AffordsbNlty Mrk: Trendt
zooz-zoas
250
200
100 Waahhqton
60
0
ro io;~ A, dJ.0 .0
jcg A~ A, 01' A ~ A ~ A A O
CCFlpun 6A HousMg AliotdabMy kdez TrQnds
2002-2006
250
200
150 $p°nM
t V~fec~inpton
100
SO
p.
o~4a~o~ ~(51ao~'v
Source: WsahinQtan Centet for Reel Eatgte Researth. Esifinetes
Rents in Spokane Courrty also compare very favorabiy wifh the Sfate of Washington as
a whole, as shown on Table 5.3.
Tab{o 6.3. Spokane Apartrnsnt Martcet Sbtfstic:s
Septsmbor 203-=2007
W~ (CouMy) AvwaQo AvKa" nv«r:.; , Nun►ba d itunbw Vacsncy
8h, Rwt R:r.s-i.t.. UnMs 2.:.i o07 Vacent: ~.%U 5 Rat. ;-t15
gep=wyper 2004
- ~ 2007
SPokam County a..'jasq_ S6 >~e2a S~b9 2,123 403,'~ •i.i,'}y/o
R
I ~AII.*ft $;764tU it~ 3~2r4iu29.o~4 Urs~nn" 1&'4,.4%
sowov. washinptori Apartrrmr,t Market, seplambef 20Q5 Updat,e, washhpton coMar tor rteal Esbbe Reee.rch
Figure 5.5 pcovides a camparison of rerits for different site units in Spokene County and
Spakane Valley based on the survey af 5096 or 100% of mutti-family camplexes with ten
or more units consVucted after 1963. it does not include rent subsidfzed unfts.
Adopbed April 25, 2006 8 Chapter 5- Ha.ESing
Chapter 7 ~ Economic
Development
City ot Spakane VaUey Comprehensive Pian
2004 employmenl data in the Spolcane MSA in comparison witfi the siate af Washingbon. During
2005, SQokane County ranked fourth in the State in job grawth, tegistsring a 22% increase (n
employment with 4,600 new jobs-'
ri ur 71 rilmanm the annual averaQQ NOfI-BarIC4lltural w8ae dnd salarY empioVmBnt (Qr
Spokane Countv
I T" 7.141c;O44 kanaMSA
l ~mbcr (Ar9t5eM ~cbd • D~err~ ~~b~er T006) (A S
~ 3 ~~ti ~
I -
I Total Emplpymettt . _ _~19.G16 - . - 3 ~S• ~,6 Y,2,12.747. Nat Jo0 FbYrs 4:V3-.Z.W a; 6/23T -6s;~83-T1.~8 4,~tD014.793
JoD Cteatlon i-i-82511.591 10-7~11 ~-_4,1,~.Q~ ~%-~1.~.1~~
fied► t~ires 3: , 0€+'39, 39Q i~r<G4~7.$f2 ti3dt3{j„@,~Z$~
~p~ ,tb;:, 7.8T~ q0,2gt~.a17 63~7b+.$$~ ~~Stl~
7umovet ~4].L$°~ ~1L4o'°~ 3441Q.~0°~
Avs n~ont,y s~:e*s-Q~44 i~~aa~:~.4~,i~s s~~~•oa~.es3.oQ sz,.~~'~2~
Eami~gs
Avy New Hf►s it;861-.GO i:-~•:b1.925.T5 $2-•icfl-30~ i~4~~,QQ
Eerrdnps t.621.Q0
Source: Woricforoe Expiorer.
NOTE QWI oourtts jobs 2nd does not indude the sQlf-empbyad.
Tabie 7.2 shaws Oecember ~~2Q46 Spokane MSA Empbyment statis'~ics by industry
cabegory. Emplayment figurES indude the setf-employed.
I Tbt17 2 Nonpq~~cultutpl W2oe~n a~ m.R nl
~ Ihe $44*arv' Metroc41d2n StatntiAl Area (SoaF:3rye C4untv)
( (m IhUUSar~dsl
~
**Mrc INDLSTRY T1Tt F inumCers in lhousands~ Q§ imm
I TOTAL N4NFARM 1!
~ 141gL, PRNATE 1 8.8
GQQQS PRODUGM1
I NATUtRAI RESC4JRCES and CONSTRi1G'LlW 131 1-6
I MpNUFACTIJRlMG 18.6 0.8
14.1 0.8
I Qursbk Ca~
( GOmUtlr and FiedmnlS Produd M 2.1 0,0
~ $EKVICES PROVIQINci 187.4 5.7
I TRADE TRANfiPORTATI .&nd UTILRM 45,7 1.
I - Wh~~l4 T~44
( _~ebA
I Fo9d and Beve:Taoe &toros 0.3
I Generai Merctiar+dise Store~
~ Weulrinplrn La6or A4erkst QverterlY Review, VN 29, No.4, preparod try the l.abor Martcei tnd Etonomic Anofysls Brandi.
Adopted April 25, 2006 3 Chaptar 7- Economic Development
City o1 Spokane VaUey Comprehens'rre Plan
~ Table 7 2 Non ariGURu(~~ Waa~ ~R~d Zalant Finalq~rrtIent In
~ Snok ne F.kt► ro~~vn Siat~G i Are~ (SoQk~ne_Countvl
I (i,n thau nds
I TransDO~~ti~ U 09ies
I INF RMATION
I FirIANCtAL ACTNiT1ES 13.8
I FIf+ nce and Ir.sufa~
I pgoFESSI n t
I Msrzgem~M of Camnanks end Erdemr~f 2,8 21
I EDUCATION end HEALTN SERVI"
I F4eaAh and Sodal Ass:st~1~144` 291 -0.1
I AMbu#ato+v N'alfh Carej rAM 11.5
I F~ S 1
20-4
I t.EtsuRE and t1oSPILAi.iT~'
~ FogC Se ' and Eklnkino P14-9 1 0.5
I OTHER SERV1M
ove~nri~l
It NT 03
t2 Gov*i n3quwmrrs~rLEdL~?ti4rtel SetvloDb D
l G v~er~S 19.5 02
nt Uonnl ~11.6
I 17-
heflFl~it[1dOMT10flf ibMl~CS F-vcWgj IC- HM --^r^-'O fT}CREbQrs Of aRi1ed WGeB 4f4 DliVBtB
hOU58f101d !!fi'{Q
-Pre2ared b a~ LaW. u.rkr1 inA EtivfpMlr iME! D(i11C,h U11ffG Benchmark hm OfOSC63-
Bureau of Labor Statisbcs
~ul'z~--f'-1 =i4L~?~:3Ffcv-6-~k1i~s'~{ifiU~--YS'v~f~~Oli-e•~¢YE1Jl~1?fc~--~Mu~LL <-'r.J ci-rr-r7-+''
~-"Pv'=;'t~'
The Spokane MSA has experienced a signficant reductS~on in unemployment durinn the last ye-y
as indicaied in Figure 7_2. This rate e-mp2fes Nvarably with the Wash+n,-: represents a decline from 6_7% rc - '
Figure 7.1. Non•Farm Ewplo~i,,,. :~t ~ - '
- ,
spolcei,e ntSA (spokane couxr)
hbriarm hd«trY 6tVbyat. Ntmbets h Thousarxis
722D
21TA
212D
20? A -
-AA
202-0 - A'
197.0 -
.r'
192D
Jen Feb Mer APr MeY ,kn Jul Aup SvP Od Nbv Dec
--t- 2006 2005 . a- 2004
Adopted April 25, 2006 4 Chapter 7- Economic Deve{opment
City of Spokane Valley Camprehonsive F'1an
j'r4 VEv ~:68A 3:400 0--f-4'e 4-..1'i*
.-€INAN6I,4L-AGT-PAT-IES -t4;" 4?~80 4.2:8A9 44% 8-t~%
S6RAGES 497904 23;480 26.189 4:" 2-2*4
E►6 R1E3CS S 31,799 34,608 37.600 4-." 1-:1594
20,300 84% '
4$,.b88 19,100
- ~T-o-,WE?sc-Rvt6" &Wg 84W 10,-100 a:" 4-"
---~R~►1~II4~N~ 33;St?8 ~~l 37;240 A," 4-2-%
4,894 Ard% A~
044
46;4E~0 -~~9 ~~6
- -Keallul r-sirs -
2,499 2-,287 2 ~trtCJ 0:" tit&°+9
S43}ffFsE~--$.~;+3=-i.! +3~-~-( S~-„~-,; Ar' d
i A -r-D2
I TeD+g 7.3 Et~pioYmen! For~c-.21 gvg~ Ava
AnnW nual
Grt~wth ~t2.~b
Est Ema, Est Emn. l. Em 24Q:
pa 2009 2014
I
s 2 57
~
( Manufaduring. p 4 4
~ LUnutodurlna
I 9.845 1. 7
27.404
I 4 1
~ 84
I 77 4
65 58-373
~ 49-997 4
1
I 4
I 1 11 17
I 16,728 17,136
I 197,842 4
~
Sou • Wcxlftrce Exolorer
Table 7.4 estjma~s the Mpx of employment by job classM within 3pokane VaUey in 2Q00.
Tab{q 7,4 Occupadons o( tlhe Ciry of Spokane 1hUey Area Residenls, 2000 CNaus
I •,;~rcent ftplow --el'by CA%9MwW^ &Pcknw VaM~ v~ Cou"t~' ifal~
Adopted April 25, 2006 6 Chapter 7- Ec4namic Development
ManaqeTnen2. Frotess+onai and fi,elated ()ccupations - 28.n 3~.u ~5 0
SwAce Oacupatiorts 15.5 16.9 14.9
in Saks and Of1koe OccuDetions 34.3 28.4 25.9
Farmin9 fishin9 and Fprestry ppaipsdpns 0_3 0.4 1.8
Conatrudlon, EAract3on, and MaMt+ensnce OcaDafbro 9.7 9.6 9.4
pcodudion. Tranepodatlon and 1AeEerlsl AAovhg QoaipaHorts 15.3 12.7 1 Z7
Govemrnent Workers (locai. sbte o► FedefaQ 123 15.7 18_5
3oume: A Demogtaphic and Eaonomlc AnaWs tor thc- Crty of Spokan e +.'alr:-y,
Dr. Grant Fasyth, Eastem Washington Universiry, 20U-
Taxabte sales withinC-uaaMLy~-G+;y-et Spokane Valley Ea&
va;idab~ ed-Bv business catestorv is shown on Table
7.5 and Fivure 7.3 F~s1-S4-~-:= -•~,1~~-,,: f_~ I?4~5 a~ ir:-Tah,,«--7-,
T.abk--T:5•Ciif-6#-Sf"-acte Vatley
S2tes4A-P4e4Ucts-by-Gat egOq►
44-1420"i-ta424412005
Buai~e~s~atogory ~ T-axaWe %
Buslncsses Sa1es
U-Rkn. 444 0
0140, 24 2-5~4v-~? 844
4 7 9-,-f 43 -2 8
G?rk~ti~?~3 4 6444~
s. 0 3 ~
144" 226 -1:;,0 2 .4ti--? 2-4()C.'r
Wk4le6a=a ~-63 8 4-489;74W.
R~4~-T~a~e -1: ~fl 8al ~b
2. °
Fir~aF~a.:n 266 37-6~
249,208:4 4a44
SePA"6 4-,797 s q:.
6eve~s~eai ~ 22-~',3~2 Ci -4=~':- :
"07;983; a 0(~4~ I
E:QS8 422
SOUrG@: Spolta~~ V<:y'.Ir;;~ Fir;ar~~e D~p: rtn~ent
7 z cs!.
City ot Spokane Vafley Comprehensive Plan
2005 Taxable Sales by Business Category
~
• unkrww n
p Relai AMoK3aa
14%, 0% O OOr►trsctlnQ
~ 21X
5%1 l O AyricuWro b fAnhQ
O Reta9 ~
2%--- ~ MUnuf@cWrinO
- 109i •Transpotla9atiiCommurticaGonelUities~
1476 - .
O Wt►olas=1e
096 ■ Govsmrtsrit
0%
■ Fteb~ Gen A~rChY~a
89i~ 5'16 21X
~ O FinaneefisvrsncefFaeal Esbte
■ Otlw Nbc Fdetd
o servke~
Fignro 7.3 2006 8ales ot Product by Cetogory
o Not CEassNied
6296 Ei Other
■ Contracting
p MsntAetturing
~ ■ TmrisporiaianlCormmiUcatiansll.Itin;es
~
• Wholssafe
2%
6sYc
394 4% 10% p% 13°16 •fZetai Trsde
a FhaneeJheurancelReal Estate
o Frervices
O GovBmri~eM
Figure 7.4 and Table 7.6 illustrate the sales tax cantributbn for aggregated categories for the
same period.
~,abte-~-SC1ty-et~paka~~ISay►
~a}~i-~'a~c- byr~t~l~ess-Gatc-s~o~y
al-1l34Q5 i.~-~2t3~t20~
Sale-& Ta; 4
64a,-Ai ~Resses
4,364 ~~-~~°k
-ft =8~-z 7-~-2;~
Adopted April 25, 2006 $ Chapter 7- Economlc Development
City of Spokane Valley Comprehen6ive Plan
R4ac~as'' ' 2==A +i3;~-~~ f►--~~-'~
~ ~ss~slGeflaa~uc~a~e~st~~4ies tzz 440;873 4-45T
4 744;3-21 &-44'
,
= 4T~445 0:04='
g,et3iE-6En AAeK4~39d+se 4.,R 2-1-25;2~4
RaacGeAR_ 441 24g-P&I 4 -57- 7
ebail a~8 :47,44-6
~I "a.? +468400 44~9`
Ti1LiVL 7.6 C..I! OI S::JM-a f'_ . ~SIIL'Y
I sat,g TaY bv Businv Cat"orv
1JiQOQ4 to 1213112004
I ewtnem Cattsocv ~ ~ ~
~ (~gt Cla~itkd 0 $I 65.442 n`. . l
~ Retall M~to/Gas mZ .18Z 3,31Z+114 1L?.~`-`
~ cgnlEa~ Tl 1.M 1.569.779 LN2
~ Anria,rtun a 609 11-21 24 19,214 Qj+°:
~ ~ 14 ZL4 3.M.418 22,63",
ManuftctMrtn 31 ~ 618A23 a&qL
~ T~rans ommunitatioos/UG71lhs "7 446.5$1 2.67`,
~ Wholemle 93 $42 1-0444~ 24L j
~ Gw4mment j-40 u? ,
~ pwt.il General AAerch~Q" .416 J,}~--
( ~nancellneuranoe~Re~1 tata ~ ~ ~ 2.''-
~ Mi"ane a~-$tore retail Rete~ !0
I ~ 13 59:
I
Total 71;91 18,717,9P,1 i00 QOcS ~
Adopted Apnl 25, 2006 g Chapter 7- Economic Development
City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Figure 7.4 2005 Taxabie Sales by 6usiness Csteeory
Ursianow n
servk" 0%
14% RelaD Auto/Gas
239G
OIMr Mac Retai
Firsancafkuurance! 5%
ROal Es1ab -
- - 2'!6 _ PIetaTGen GbnMt"
MKChsndis e g%
15%
AgricWtute 8 MnN
C3ovamrt~eM`1~ - ` 0%
0% I Rotuii
Nfhobsale_"~ 22%
596 I tu~nutacuxng
TransportstbN 5~6
Comrunbcationa!
Utmies
1%
Figure 7.4 2006 Sales Tax by Business Category
Services
13g6 ~I
Other MBsc Retel ~
g% Un o~w n ~~il AutolGas
, 24%
Flnancelhsurance
R8a1 Estate - -
2%
Contracting
R,siai Gsn Merchandise - 996
14% ~~d Agricufture & N~ining
Govemment, ~ 2396 n%
096 ~ Manuf ecturing
49b
Wholesabe J/ Transportatlon
8% Communications/Mes
396
Z - ~-cTS~"~C~-". -EO'TT ~ ltCC'~~I'i: Y8 'GrT OtrJ1~Yt}
vom^..w Qn o+ Q*+R« bxable sales is Mustrateci !n Figure 7.5
Adopted Aprt125, 2006 10 Chaptef 7- Economic Development
City ot Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Ft9ure 7.6 2006 Sa{es Tax Coliecdons (In :OOOs)
: r
^ • 1~~.~~'
102005 Collectlons ~
L~2005 Budget
512,2 0 j -
~n $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000
Figure 7.5 City of Spokane Vailey Gross TaxaUle Sai_•s
2.000,000,000 ,
1.500,000.000 2004 , ~ - -
, . _i
1,000,000.000 boo,oao.oao
a - _
2004 1,634.650, ~ ( i
2005 1,807,983,00C
2008 1,e81.7ee.000
Source: Spokane Valley Finenoe DepartmE:
Property taxes are Rart of the cost of doirtg business. The 2005 Property taxes in Spokane Valley
Inciude County. City, Library Bond. State Scfiool. Firc
iliustra#ed in Table 7.7., fir fndividual Tax Code Areas (TG
I Tabla 7 7Z00T Prooo!tr Tax Rat*s within Sookane Valley per St 000 valuatlon
I ! T 140 TG/+ 4 T 14+ T 1; T 1 T A 14
~ o
I M 1.63107157
~ 2,19378142
~
9 M
Arfapted April 25, 2006 ~ ~ Chapter 7- Economic Development
Ciry oi Spokane Vepey Comprehensnre Ptan
g I 1.7
I 4,54083214
Flra O1 Sa, k,ns 7
Va1w 2,72507769
I O
~ 125 12,95SUM 15-54799377
I
Souroe: Spokane County Assessor
A signiflcant indicator of ecOnomic vitality is oonstruction activrh'• Figure 7.4 summarizes levels of
cor►struction act}vity since incorpofabon.
Adopted April 25, 2006 12 Chapter 7- Econcxnic Devebpment
Chapter 8 - Natural
Environment
Ciiy of Spokane Valley CompreheRShre Pfan
NEP-12.3 Encourage the use anci preservation of native plants in residerttial and
nonresidental landscaping.
NEP-124 Foster the protection af wildlife corridors in publidy owned open spaoe
where appropriate. These ereas should use nafive piants that suppott
native species af birds and animais where appropriate.
NEP-1Z5 Encourage informational and educational pcograms and adivities
dealing with tfie prvtedion of wildlife.
NEP-12.6 Land use regulations and decisions will consider density transfers,
bonus density, neture area preservatjon or other innovative
mechanisms to cetain fish and wildlife habftet areas.
NEP-12.7 DevelopmeM proposats and tttieir design shall consider the retention
and maintenance of crftlcal fish and wiidlife habftat areas and will
provide buffers to proted corridors and water habita#s.
NEP-12_8 Coanilnate with Washington State Department of Fksh and widlife in
planning and management of fish and wilcitife habitat resources.
Flood Areas
Goal
NEG-13 Woric to idenfity waterahed characteristlca that affect trequentiY
flooded areaa.
Goal
NEG44 Assist in the management of frequently flooded areas bo enhance
environmental quality and to minlmtze the riska to itfe and
PropertY•
Policies
NEP-1a. t Frequently flooded areas and marshes should be used as forest,
wildlife habitat, open space, r+ecreation and ather appropriate uses
whenever practicai.
NEP-14.2 Require the maintenanoe, protecfion or restoraiion of ratural drafnage
systems and :
AlEP-t4.3-kJuse bioengtneering techniques-w4efa-~pR4~r~, rather than-ta;add
er~+~r~g-si~~ras structural solutio~s wh~re aossible. io.-.,t-ab+1L~.
NEp_14.43Development shouid tneet tnP obiectives and reauiremerits of the
Nationa) Flood Insurance Proaram for reducina floods hazards and
minimlzing flood losses ~J6-►~*'~*lf~-~-~ within a
10Q-year floodplain_-a^.--;~T::;-~~---~--~;~?-~~r
mv;+ga~~.
Geologicalty Hazardous Areas
Goal
NE~1¢ Devebpment should be discoursped in geologkally hazardous
aroaa uniesa k can be denwnstrated that a harard arsa can be
devetoped conslstent wkh public health and safety.
Adopted April 25, 2006 29 Chapter 8- Natural Environment
i
Chapter 9 - Parks,
i~~cr~ifl~~ ~ ~ ~d the Arf
~
~
Ciry of Spakane Valley Canprehensive Plen
neighborhood park, there are no specft criteria tc 9uide development oi facilfbes. Given thelr size,
they are typkca8y not intended to be used for programmed ectivitles.
922 Ntthborbflod Psrlcs
Neighborhood parks remain the basic untt of the
paric system and aerve as tlhe recreational and
sodal foais ot the nefghbafiood. 'fhey should be
devebped far both acbve and pessive reaeabon
actMdes geare0 specificalty for those lMng within
the service area. Aocommodafing s wide vadety ,
af age and usef groups, fncluding chfldren, adults,
elderly, and specFal needs populabons Is
important Cresting e sense of Piaoe by bringtng
tAgether tte unique character af the sfte with tliat -
of the neighborhood is vftal to a sucoessful
design.
A neighborhood park sttiould be centrafly located
withtn Its senrioe area, which encompasses a one-
quarter b one-hatf mfle radius uninterrupted by major streets or other physical barriers. A persori's
ProPensth► tc use a neighborhood Rark Is 9reaUY reduoed If they peroeive it to be difficuit to access or
not withln a reasonable walking distance. Frequently neighborhood parks are developed aciJacent to
elementary sdhoots.
s~+g~be~taee~-~~ses~~,t-to-•#;aV4e
Generatty,-,v MiRiFAWFA
_~,-~-~_~~-L~~ U&S. to- ' ' ene#-apfin;al,, neiahbofiaod
narkc are smaU in size ranQirg from three to sevgn acm. Ease of eccess from the surrounding
neiyhbofiood, centrai locatian, and Unkage to gteenways are key ooncerns when seleding a site.
Dsvebpment af a neighborhood patk should seek to achieve a balance betw8en acGve and passive
perk uses. Potential active recrsation facitities tndudes ptay strucUures, courl garr►es, Inbrtnat piayfieki
or open space, tBnnis courts, volleyball courts, horseshoe anea, ke skebing srea, and wadfng pool and
activity room. As ageneral ni{e, actlve racnaation fadlities sttould consume approximately 500A of tt►e
perks erea iskWng tt►e remaining 5096 for passive recreation aress.
Neighbodmod parks tocally include the following fadimes:
• Accesslble PlaY eQuiP~t rneeW9 aPProPriabe st8ndards (or ctdkJren ftve and under. and
chifdren ofder tt►an five years of age;
. picnic areas with t8b{es, caok gtills, shet6sm drinkfng fountains, and trash receptacles;
. Mufti purpose courts for basketbail and volleybali
or Iighted tennts courts;
• Levet, open play area tor' ethletlc team ptac~ioe or
'pick-up" games;
. Landscaping tor beautificatlon of the stte and to
provide same perimeber screening of the faditty,
• Security Ifghting and an intemal trail system that
is Gnked to adjacent sidewa{ks.
92.3 Sthool-Park
By combining the resources of Mro public agencies '
(school dEstrid and dty), the School-Park dassification
aliows tar expanding recreadonal, sociai, and educadon _
opportunhies avaHahle tio the community in an efticient . ; .
and cost effeclive manner. Depertding on its slze, one t
Adopted April 25, 2Q06 3 Chapter 9- Parks, Recreaiion and the Arts
school-paric site mey setve in a number of capacities, such as a neighboriiood park, youth athletic
fields, and a school. T'he important outcome in the jofnt-use relationship ls that both the schflol district
and the city's park system benefit from shared use of facilities and land area.
The opbmum size of a school-park is dependent upon its intended use. The size cciteria eshablished for
nelghbofiood and cammuntty park dassfications shauld he used as appropriate. The schoal lands,
inciuding the building and speciai use facliibes, should not be considered in the level of service (LOS)
Establishing a dearly deflned Jaint-use agreement between the school disfict and cfty is critical to
malcing school-park retationships workabte This is particUtariy imp-or,ant vtt, respect to @cquisition,
de+relopment, malntenance. use, and prOCCarrimin.3 of `_acilicie,
8.2.4 Community Parks
Community parks are larger in sze ard serve a bra2der purpcse tt,,an neighbornaai par'r.s. i heir focus
is on meeting the recreation needs of several neighborhoods or lerge sec~ians of the community. They
al[aw for group activities and offer other recneeUonal opportunlties that either aseis not feasible or noi
deslrabte st tltie neighbofiood park level.
A cammunity park will setve two or more neighbarttioods. The service area can range from a one-half
mile to i#re9- two mile radius depending on popuiation densities and other tactors. Community parks
should be served by artetiai or majar coifector streEts and be easlty accessible from the entlre service
area by way of intetconnecting traiis. Community parks should accammodate boEh passive and active
recreadon activities. inoarporation of natural features such as lake6, ponds, rivers or other natural
resource features is highiy desirab{e. Land within 100 year flood plains shouid not be used for slting
rec,reation tacilities, but shauid rather be used for passive recreaGon areas.
Community parks are typically developed for both active and passive recreatian uses. Although active
recreation facilities are intended to be used in an informal and unstructured manner, reserved and
programmed use is oompabble and acceptable. However, community parks are not normalty intendzd
to be used exclusivety for programmed adult ethtetic use arxi toumarr►ents.
Potential adhre recreaEion facltitles indude:
. Lighted competftive aEfiiletic facllities such as soccer, softball, tenni=, baset,a11 and basketbau:
• MulHpurpose trails for walking, jogging, exerdse, and transpor:aiion;
• Recreation centef, sw(mming pools, or group meefing faGlities;
• Support lacilities such as an intemal road system, iighted parkiny areas, rebt roums,
concessfans, and security lightlng;
• Landscapfng for beautifx;aNon of the iacilftEes and perimeter landscaping ta screen tne `zcility ur
acdvities.
9.2.6 Reg(onal or Larga Urban Parks
Regional or large urban parics serve a broad~_r puipos-B ;han cun,munity parir:s an:i u_-~,d .tifr~n
community and nelghbofiood parks are not edequate to serve the needs of the community. The iocus
of reglonal parks is on meetJng communify-based recreabon needs, as well as preserving uNqui_
landscapas and open spaces.
Due to the slze arxl intansity of recxeation activities, regional parks should be loca#ed with immediai-
access to an arterial street Regional parks should not be located in re.aidentlal areas given th-=
potantial impact from traffic, Qght, glare and nolse. A regional park shou{d be centrally located wtth
tt►e praposed service area, to the extent possf6le. Typically, regbnal parks are a minimum in sizet-wO, ti+~'1=a•
In addfion Uo neighbofiood and commun'rty park ftc11i6es, new
all uf the following:
• Lakes, fOrests, ar., r,,,.,
. ij_, .,r;;~-~~
Adopted A.pnl 25, 2006 4 C;iI~p t,F i~L:r;•,_. F;•.-.c; tiol
City of Spokane Valley Comprehertstve Plan
. HfstoriGCulturel/Social Sites - unique local resources offering historical, educational, and
cuttural oppartunities. Examples include historic downtown areas, performing arts parks,
arboretums, ornamental gardens, performing arts facilfUes, fndoor theaters, churches, pubiic
buildings and amphittteatars.
. Recreation Faciiitles - specialued or single purpose facilitles. Examples iRCiude cvrnmuntty
centers, senior centers, oommunity theatefs, hodcey arenas, marinas, gotf courses, and aquatic
parks. Frequently communiry buildings are located in a neighbofiood or communiry paric.
• Outdoot Reueation Fad(fttes - Euamp{es tnclude tennls oenters, softbali oamplexss, and
sparts stadtums.
Fadiity space requirements are the primary determinant of site size. For examp{e, a gatt course may
require 150 acres to acaommodate ail the necessary facii'rti" and parkfng, wheceas a con'►munity
center with parking may frt on 10 to 15 acxes. Special use facilttes should be sirateglcally Iocated
rather than serving weli-defined neighborhoods or ereas. Tha site should be located so that it ls
accessibie from arterials or collector streets LocaUng e special use facllity is variable depending on the
type af facility.
9.3 Parks Future Needs Assessment
8.3.1 ExEsting Condittons
GMA (36.70A.070) requires juriadicbons to estimaL p3rks and rzcreatlon demand for a rninimum of a
ten year period. In order to predlct or estimate paric and recreati~on demand in tne hutura, an analysis of
existing park and recreadon demand Es the first step. As of June 1, 2005, Spokane Valley had a total of
163.45 acres of parks. The City's offraal Aprii 1, 2005 population es estimated by the Washington
State Office oi Fnanciai Management (QFM) w'as 85,010. This F= sult= r It in aa-c-x~r-4».9 parks
Eevel of service (LOS) of 1.92 acres af dty parks per 1,000 res3dents whfch Es the adopted level of
service for narks. TTie Citv's 2087 OFM estlmate tS 88,280. In 2007 the Citv purchased 8.3 scres af
Gand in the Greenacres area for a future nefqhbofiood aark The addition of the new Qaric tand In
Greenacres enables the GiN to mainlain the estab6sttied (evel oi sernoe for parks, h1ap 9.1 Idenhfles
existing parics and recreation facilities within the CEty oi Spokane Valley
A community-wide survey conducted In March and April of 2004 includesi a number of questions related
to p3rks and recxeation services. E}ghty peroent of respondents tndicated that they considered parks In
Spokane Valley to be good, very good or excel[ent Approximately 56 percent of the respondents
indicated that building more parlcs shouid be either a metiium or hlgh prfority. The foltowing tabte
provides a summary of existing Gty park end recreadon facilttfes:
T*b194"
Existing Rarks ai'd-Rf'{f8cz.iiCfl-FLs14ft#•
I TaWe s t Existlna Pft and RecrtaUo~ ~aOtit#n
I Typo Pok OewloWed Aawsp Undrvalope0/1itia0e Ta1N Aassgs
ishbori►ood Parks
/our 2.8E 0 286
s 8.03 0 d 03
astb 0 271 271
Edgedff 4.74 0 4_T4
~ 9.24 0 92<
Adopted April 25, 2006 6 Chapter 9- Parks, Recre.ation and the Arts
City of Spoicene Va!{ey ComprEhensive Plan
I Tablo 91 Existlno Qarks an Recroat{on Facilltlos
I Typs Paek Und"d4b kmap ToW kr"qs
OTAL ttEIQHBdR3i00D 24.87
~~t Sd.88
ommunity Parks
apey Misslon 21.81 0 21.91
AL CpNMUMmI 21.91 0 21.01
rye Urban Psrb
Irabeau Poltri 45.01 0 45 01
OTAL IARCiE UR9AN 46.01 O 46,01 I
ptcial l?se 1lroas
adc Road Pool 2•00 2-00 I
ultlven Park 18.07 16.07 ~
aliey Senior Center 2.09 2-09
OTAL 8PECiAI USE 20.46 20.16
ndevaloped Park Lwd li
:entetPlace 10_60
yrtle Polnt 31.07
bYay Mlesion - South 7.22
TOTAL UNDEVELOPED 48•79 ~
ITY TOTALS 111.96 Li.bo ts3etb
69.8 171.76
1"here are also a number of non-cfty parks and ci-,.-_ ~=-^•.=~r_-~ Fittf =r in cr ad;acent t_r, '
Spokane Vatiey that are utiC¢ed by aty residents G;
Table4
Now-G#tir-Ra*e-arvi
I Tahle 9.2 Non-tltv Pafks snd Oo*n Saate -
I CNwbDed /4anps lhndevelaVed Itiaeap ToW Aasap
I rttentda! Trdil 113.48 113.48
!
I tarde`s Feny 88 21 80.7
I hcnan HAts Natural Area 225.5 226_5
Adopted April 25, 2006 7 Chapter 9- Pari:s, Recrcatian and Li? ArU
City of Spakane Valley Comprutransfve Plan
[VR Open Space
. Gneen /laes
. MWi6ew Pdrtt
. Pasadana Park
TOTAL 260.44 260.94
~TAL 201.48 490.14 691.62
9.3.2 Estimatod Populadan Growth
A ragbnal methodology for esfimating future population growth was adopted by the Board of County
CommIssioners (BoCC) based on a recommendation of the Steering Committee of Elected Officials
(SCEO). Spakane Valley prepared a land capacity analysis of the aty and surnounding UGAs based an
the abave regional methodology- The or'ginal anatysis inciuded the Aicott Jaint Pianning Area, wtifch
has been deleted fram the infonnation below. The results of this analysis were presenbed tn tfie SCEO
o+i June 24 and Juty 29, 2004 requesting a poputatiori eilocabon for planning purposes.
Spokane Valfey proposed e poPutation allocaUon of 20,666 to the SCEO based on ft regional land
capacity metiiodology. This request was proposed as an "interim' request based on the
landtpopulation capacity within the exdsting corporate boundaries of Spokane Val{ey. The raasan for
thls request was based on the significant issues related to vraste waber treatment capacity. Once the
waste water tssues have baen resotved, Spokane Valley wiil prEpare a revislon ta the population
allocation and present thEs information to the SCEO. The Spokane County Board of County
Commissioners approved this population aliocation in November 2004. In 2006 the BoCC saat4ved via
ResolutlQn 06-0438 e poaulation slbcation of 33,125 fof Spokane Valiev for olanninQ pus. The
folbwing table summarizes eshmated PoPutation 9rQwth and the impaci on pa*s and recreation
facilities.
Ulle-8:3
FctitirL P:rik-& R-e~ore?L=_r DE-miard
T:ble 9 3 F~Wro Park ~ Recroation O8!?!and
°f Addkfotu d ll~aaage lteodid ~l
~ .46 oa~ CumM lOS )
fi:-:.-J .e:: r__r$ 1,~ "v
33.1 y~ 124.1?3 1.92 aue9J1.000
As Indcated in Sectlon 9.3.1 abova, the c.ity cun'entlY has 463,46' 171.75 acres of parks. To maintain
the existing LOS, the city wrould need to add approximatety 3945-- 58.89 acres of parks by the year
2025.
9A The A~ts
Arts and culture are essenta) for oontlnuing the grawth and development of Spokane Valley's citizens,
ecanomy and quafity of life. Spolcene Valley should strive to beoome more than a martcetplace. It
should become a dynamic place where both citizer►s and vEsltors can experience a quaUty environment
that inciudes the Arts.
Nelghbortsoods and buslness dfstricts should enhence their vibmncy and dfstindive sense of piace.
These areas shouid offer a wkie variety of culturaf choioes and opportunites for soctal (nteraction and
self-expression.
Adapted Apri! 25, 2006 $ Chapter 9- Parks, Recreatian and the Arts
~ Spokane Valley Planning Commission
;
Draft Minutes . .
Council Chambers - City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
May 8, 2008
I.CALL TO ORDER
Chair called the meeting to order at 6:00 pm.
II.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance
III.ROLL CALL
Commissioners Robertson, Beaulac; Carroll, Eggleston, Kogle, Sands, and Sharpe were
present. '
Staff attending the meeting: Greg McCormick, Planning Manager; Mike Basinger, Senior
Planner, h1icki Harnois, Associate Planner; Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner; Tavis
Schmidt, Assistant Planner; Deanna Griffith; Adrninistrative Assistant.
IV.APPROVAL OF AGENDA .
It was moved by Commissioner Beaulac seconded by Commissioner Kagle, and
unanimously agreed to accept the May 8, 2008 agenda as presented.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Q There were no minutes to approve. ,
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
7ohn Hamersky, 623 N Marguerite: Mr. Hamersky stated that he was disturbed by
the graffiti in his neighborhood. He stated that the thought that graffiti was a crime.
Mr. Ham&sky stated that people have been tivriting on the street, slow down for
chfldren. He stated they had paid for the sewer and the repaving of the street, it was
a new street and he wants someone to do something about the graffiti on his street.
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
No Commission reports
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
No Administrative Reports • IX.COMMISSION BUSINESS
New Business - Street Vacation SN-01-07 Assistant Planner Karen Kendall made
a presentation to the Commission regarding the vacation of a alleyway between
Sprague Ave and First Ave. The alley way is proposed to be moved south approx. 26
feet and rededication of the portion of the alleyway is approximately 300 feet long.
The current alley is only 15 feet wide, the Spokane County Fire Dept is requiring 20
feet of dedication. Public Works has no objections regarding this proposal, staff has
received no comment regarding the proposal, staff is currently recommending a
conditional approval. Commissioners questions of staff were, Did the other business
or property owners have comments? Ms. Kendall answered that Mr. Thompson of
Dave's Bar and Grill also signed the application and the staff had received no
objections from the surrounding business owners. Commissioner Beaulac stated he
was going to recusQ himself from this amendment.
05/08/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 6
I
1
' i
f
Don Groman, 12424 E Houk: Mr. Groman stated he wanted to know if the alley ~
would be a one way or a two way. Ms. Kendall stated there had Geen no ~
recommendatron from Publrc WonFs.
)ane Singleton, PO Box 141341: Ms. Singleton stated that she is the curator of the
museum. Ms. Singleton stated that she would prefer that the alley stay a two way and
asked how to approach Public Works about it, but is very concerned about the safety
of the children. She stated that school trips have increased and the firaffic seems to go
through the area fairly fast. Mr. McCormick stated that the directronal issue rs not an
rssue for the Planning Commission.
Chris Herman, 10821 E. 21s`: Mr. Herman stated he had more questions than
comments, which were about the project that the street vacation is tied to. Mr.
Herman wvanted to know what the project was going to look like, if anyone had seen a
visual of it. The Chair reminded Mr. Herman that the P/anniRg Commission was only to
make a decision regarding the street vacation. Mr. Herman contfnued to ask questions
regardrRg the deve%pment of the prnnperty. Mr Herman wanted to know if he avould
be ab/e to comment on the deve%pment 6f the property. The vacatlon process does
not al/ow for the publrc comment on the developmerit on the site.
Gary Bernardo, 107 S. Howard: Mr. Bernard stated he is representing the owner,
Mr. Tom Hamilton, regarding the project. Mr. Bernardo stated that the vacation was
an important part of the project but that most of the rest of the issues had not been
defined. Mr. Bernardo said that the owner agrees ovith all conditions in the staff report
and that he asks that the Planning Commission approve the vacation.
Commissioner Robertson seeing no one else that wished to testify closed the public ~
hearing at 6:30 p.m. Commissioner Kagle made a motion to recommend approval of -STV-01-07 to the City Council, Commissioner Beaulac seoonded the motion.
Commissioners had discussion regarding the older buildings being taken down but
noting that this was not a condition they could take into oonsideration during their
deliberations. There was discussion of the speeds currently being driven and the
amount of pedestrian traffic moving around the businesses and the museum. Vote on
the street vacation SlV-01-07 is five to one in favor. Motion passes.
Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Amendments:
Senior Planner Mike Basinger explained to the Planning Commission that there would
be eight private Comprehensive Plan Map amendments, however 07-08 and 08-08
would be heard on May 22, due to a noticing error. Mr. Basinger explained to the
Commission how the map and text amendments would be presented and the materials
that the Commissioners had received previously in preparation.
Associate Planner Micki Harnois presented CPA-01-08, Iocated south of Mission on
Mamer, two parcels, currently are Low Density Residential and are proposed to change
to Mediurn Density Residential. 7hese parcels are located south of the retirement
complex and owned by Evergreen Fountains Retiremenfi facility.
Greg Arger, 300 N Mullan Rd.: Mr. Arger eacplained the uses currently on site at
Evergreen Fountains and that the adjoining parcels will be used to add triplex rnttage
homes. Mr. Arger stated this will allow people to live independently and still remain
close to the faciliry if they should need to use tfie nursing services provided in the
larger complex.
~
Commissioner Kogle made a motion to recommend approval of CPA-01-08 to the City
Council, second by Commissioner Sands, vote is unanimous. "
05/08/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 6
~ Assaciate Planner Hamois presented CPA-02-08, located one block north of Trent
Ave. and between Dick and Vista Rds. The current designation is Low Density
Residential the applicant would like to change it to Corridor Mixed Use, Ms. Hamois
also pointed out that this parcel is in the Airport Overlay Zone.
]oe Stoy, 2711 E. Sprague Ave.: Mr. Stoy stated he was representing the owner of
the property. The current use in the larger parcel is being used to assemble
commercial paint booths. Mr. Stoy stated that the owner has a difficult time unloading
supplies on the site and needs the extra property for landscaping and a buffer.
Commissioners asked Mr. Stoy questions regarding the landscaping, buffer and the
abiliry to have the transportation trucks maneuver around the property without having
to laack out onto Trent Ave. Commissioner Kogle made a motion to recommend
approval of CPA-02-08 to the City Council, second by Commissioner Beaulac, vote is
unanimous in favor.
Associate Planner Harnois presented CPA-03-08 which is located along Marguerite Rd
at klki Rd. There are 5 parcels involved in this amendment, currently they are
designated Low Density Residential, would like to change it to Office, Garden Office.
Ms. Harnois stated she had reteived three comment letters, which the Commissioners
had copies of, each addressing traffic concerns.
Joe Stoy, 1104 N Perrine: Mr. Stoy stated that lie was representing the owner of
the properties. Mr. Stoy stated that the applicant wauld like to change the property
designation s4 that a retirement facility could be built on the parcels, creating a buffer
behveen the commercial uses on Argonne and the residents. Traffic from the facility
would be directed onto Alki. Rd.
~ Commissioner Beaulac asked why Che applicant was requesting Garden Office instead
of Prluttifamily. Mr. Stoy stated that after discussions with staff that they had been
directed to use this zoning. Garden Office is a transition zone and best suited for this
type of facility was reasoning given by Senior Planner Basinger. Commissioner Kogle
askeci a,Guestion regarding height restrictions in the Garden Office area, which is
limited to 45 feet, answer supplied by staff.
Kathryn Henderson Mann, 505 N. Marguerite: Ms. Mann stafied that the West
Valley city school is not a high school but a middle school. Ms. Mann stated that she
had submitted a letter for the record. That the property is currentiy zoned R-3 and R-
4, single family residential. Ms. Mlann statetl that the area is a vast neighborhood of
older homes. She also stated that she is concerned that there are already tao many
vacant office buildings along Argonne and listed them. N9s. Mann said at the time of
writing her letter she was not aware of the intended use of the property and was
ooncerned about allowing more office into the neighbofiood that is unneeded.
7ohn Hamersky, 623 Pl Marguerite: Mr. Hamersky stated that the traffic in his
neighborhood keeps increasing and now you want to put a 45 foot building, with more
sirens, more speeders, and more people who don't care. Mr. Hamersky stated it is
people with money who don't care. He also said we don't need the development, with
the schaols and the parks and the kids - the kids are on skateboards, the kids are on
bikes - it is wrong.
Kevin Pereira, 8821 E Valleyway: Mr. Pereira stated that there was not any
commercial property along Marguerite from Broadway to Valleyway and he is
concerned that if this is allowed that cvmmercial will cvntinue to encroach infio the
neighborhood farther and farther. Mr. Pereira stated that when he moved into the
neighborhood he did not expect to have 120 units of commercial property next door
`and is opposed to this change.
Page3of6
05/08J2008 Planning Commission Minutes
i
~
~
~
~
]oe Stoy, 1104 N Perrine: Mr. Stoy stated h~e ~o~ ukdrelike ate ta buffers besor-ne twe nf hthe e
neighbors concerns. He stated he was tryg to the I
commercial and the residential properties. Mr. Stoy stated tt~at the property
south of his (that belongs to the school) is mostly paved. Mlr. Stoy stated that he I
would direct traffic toovard Argflnne but oould not force people tv go that direction, ~
however the age of the residents would cut down on the traffic. ~
Kevin Pereira, 8821 E. Valleyway: Mr. Pereira stated that the school property is
only half paved and the rest was a baseball diamond. ~
7ohn Hamersky, 623 N Marguerite: Mr. Hamersky y Ptep hewas concerned that if ~
this development is allowed t1'iat it will raise or lower m ro erty values.
Commissioner Kogle made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council which
was seconded by Commissioner Beaulac. Commissioners had a discussion covering
issues regarding if the zoning is a correct buffer, useS allowed, fitting the intention of
the Comprehensive Plan, would any portion be open to the public like a mixed use
building, noise concerns. After oonsiderable discussion Commissioner Kagle withdrew
her motion and Commissioner Sharpe made a motion to continue CPA-03-08 to May
22, 2008, second by Commissioner Beaulac, Motion vote unanimous.
Assistant Planner Tavis Schmidt presented CPA-04-08 which is 3 parcels located at
120 S. Tschirley. Mr. Schmidt stated that the applicant is requesting a change from
Corridor Mixed Use to Medium Density Residential.
Steven Ford, 320 S. Sullivan: Mr. Ford stated he was speaking on behalf of the
applicants and that they are thinking of adding low income housing to the properties.
Mr. Ford stated he evas speaking in favor of the proposal.
Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend approval to the City Coundl of
CPA-04-08, second by Commiss+oner Eggleston, vote is unanimous.
Asst. Planner Schmidt presented CPA-05-08 ovhich is located 11901 E Broadway, the
requested 'change is from Low Dens'rty Residential to Garden Office. Commissioners
Robertson and Sharpe both recused thernselves from this amendment.
Cal Walker, 11917 E Broadway: Mr. Walker stated that his intention is to restore
the house that is on the properly for an office use and then build an off`ice building
similar to the one that is located on the property to the east of this parcel.
Commissioner Sands had a question regarding access to Cataldo to the north, evhich
was anstivered that they would not be using Cataldo for access.
Tom Watson, 120 E. Nora: Mr. Watson stated he represents the next parcel over
and that he thought that there had been concern in the past regarding traffic if there
were going to be to high density uses on the properties. However, Mr. Walker's use
and the use.on the parcel he is representing, for Nik Arbariotes, are both low density
and low traffic volumes so it will not be a concern.
Cal Walker, 11917 E Broadway:* Mr. bValker stated that his and Mr. Artaariotes
projects are not related.
Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend approval of CPA-05-08 to the City
Council, second by Commissioner Beaulac. Comment from Commissioner Carroll
expressing concern about encroachment into the residential neighborhood. Vote is
four to one, Commissioner Carroll is the no vote.
Asst. Planner Schmidt presents CPA-06-08, located at 11813 E. Broadway, requesting ~
a change from Low Density Residential to Office/Garden Office. Commissioner Sharpe
recused himself from this amendment.
Page 4 of 6
05/08/2008 Planning Commission Minutes
~ Tom Watson, 120 E. Nora: Mr. Watson is speaking on behalf of the owner of the
property. Mr. Watson stated that Garden Office will allow the 66 bed Alzheimer's
facility they would like to build on the site.. The owner is considering restoring the
home on the site for ancillary medical office uses. Mr. Watson stated he believes the
traffic impact tivill be low, centered around the staff and visitors.
There was discussion from the Commissioners regarding the zoning that could also
allow this facility on the property and the traffic impacts. Commissioner Sands made a
motion to recommend approval to the City Council of CPA-06-08, second by
Commissioner Carroll. Commissioners expressed concern that multifamily might be a
better zone, is Garden Office a good transition zone, less traffic than multifamily,
difference between this and the amendment that was continued - this one is on an
arterial yd. Vote on the motion is unanimous, six to zero. -
Planning Manager, Greg McCormick, presented the text amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan to the Planning Commission. Mr. McCormick explained that most
of the changes were updating table information and formatting changes.
CPA-09-08, Chapter 1, minor changes to some population figures on page 6.
CPA-10-08, Chapter 2, updates to the Countywide Planning Policies, population
numbers, a new section of goals and 'policies regarding potential annexation areas,
adopting current UGAs, Table 2.1 has been updated with land capacity anafysis.
CPA-11-08, Chapter 3, updates to non-motorized transportation terms for consistency
with SRTC, the width of a shared use path, the bike and pedestrian map has been
updated. .
~ CPA-12-08, Chapter 5, updating the data on housing prices, table 5.3 update
information. CPA-13-081 Ghapter 7, updates to the sfiatistical data and tables.
CPA-14-08, Chapter 8, combine policles 14.2 and 14.3 into one policy and minor
changes to the numbering system and sbme minor changes to the flood plain
information.
CPA-15-08, Chapter 9, update to the neighborhood parks and regional parks, update
to match the parks master plan, updated the population estimates and the parlcs
inventory to add the new Greenatres park.
Commissioner Sands made a motion to recomrnend approval to the City Council of
CPA-10-08 through CPA-15-08, second by Commissioner Eggleston, vote is unanimous.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER
Commissioner Kogle stated she had scheduling oonFlict next week and was not sure
she would be able to make the meeting. Commissioner Robertson stated that he
would be out of town for the meetings of the 150' and the 22"d. .
XI. AD70URNMENT
The being no other business the meeting was adjourneti at 8:32 p.m.
SUBMITTED: APPROVED:
05/08(2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 6
/
Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant Ian Robertson, Chairperson
~
05/08/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 6
~ Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Draft Minutes
Council Chambers - City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
May 22, 2008
I.CALL TO ORDER
The Chair called the mee4ng to order at 6:00 pm.
II.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance
III.ROLL CALL
Commissioners Beaulac, Carroll, Kogle, Sands, and Sharpe were present.
Commissioners Eggleston and Robertsfln were absent.
Staff attending the meeting: Greg McCormick; Planning Manager; Scott Kuhta; Senior
Planner, Mike Basinger; Senior Planner, Micki Harnois; Associate Planner, Deanna
Griffith; Administrative Assistant. '
IV.APPROVAL OF AGENDA
It was moved by Commissioner Kogle seoonded by Commissioner Carroll, and
unanimously agreed to accept the May 22, 2008 agenda as presented.
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES . 0 There were no minutes to approve. ,
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
The was no public comment VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
PJo Carnmission reports
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS
fVo Administrative Reports
IX.COMMISSION BUSINESS
Old Business - Continued Public Hearing CPA-03-08: Associate Planner Micki
Harnois made a presentation to the Commissioners reprising the amendment and the
designations that are being proposed, Ms. Harnois al a~ nt~he hability to change the
h a d c onferred ovith the City Attorney, Mike Connelly, re~g 9
amendment from Office to Multifamily and his opinion would be that t he app lican t
would need, to made a new request and start the pracess over with the 2009 requests.
Commissioners questioned h9s. Hamois regarding access to the site and if it would be
an condition of approval.
Kathryn Mann, 505 N. Marguerite: Ms. Mann stated she and her husband had
walked thoa eookedrl kec u~re ly a duthat theyhwould like to preserverthe character
neighborho
of their neighborhood.
Michae) Mann, 505 N. Marguerite: Mr. P9ann stated that he and his wife had
p u r c h a s e d into their quiet neighborhood, without worry of commercial development.
Mr. Mann stated he is concerned about the extra traffic, t he impa c t to t h e w i l d l i f e i n
Page 1 of 5
05/2212008 Planning Commission Minutes
i
~
i
i
~
the neighborhood. Mr. Mann also thought that one sign for 5 parcels was not enough
and thafi the sign did not change to notify the vote had been Ghanged to May 22. ~
Ed Brandt, 8802 E. Valleyway: Mr. Brandt stated he felt that this deveiopment was ~
inappropriate for the neighborhaod. Mr. Brandt shared that people regularfy ride their f
bikes around the neighborhood and around the school. He also stated he was ~
concerned about the traffic. Mr. Brandt stated his family would prefer that this not be ~
changed. ~
7ohn Hamersky, 6me N of thi~s natute.would do to his property values.as ~ncemed
about what a develop
Kerry Barta, 8807 E Valleyway: Mr, Barta testifed that he felt that the
development would devalue his property and increase traffic. Mr. Barta stated that
there are several children that play in the area and that they are concerned for the
children, his family enjoys the area and this (development) is not something they
would like to have in the neighborhood. •
Ron Stien, 8810 E. Alki: Mr. Stien stated he lias friends that live near Park Place that
there are ambulances and road crews working there all the time with the naise and
that tfiey say the~nis e~s r~venue ot e}' ways, theeowne~ i hjust thee~to akeosome
here, the Valley 9 ,
dough and get out.
Larry Anderson, 8805 E Valleyway: Mr. Anderson stated that ~ere ru Anderson
other locations that the developer could go and not destroy p op Y•
stated he does not want cement trucks and heavy machinery in the neighborhood
during the time it takes to build the thing.
Claire Froehlich, 525 N Marguerite: Ms. Froehlich stated if she had known this was hotiv the neighborhood would go she never would have bought there. -
Dwight Hurime, 9101 N. Mt. View Lane: Mr. Hume stated he had attended the
previous rrieeting and had driven by the area aftenwards. Mr. Hume shared that a
special study had been done that senfor services facilities have not been shown to have
any appreciable damage to the value of single family residences. He also stated that
nursing homes and retirement facilities are less of a nuisance than apartment
compleaces. Garden Office is intended to be a transition zone to single family
residences.
Marie Fruin, 706N• Mill be a rdetriment to Ithe satle of her property anddth ta t ~v II
change to this p opetY
affect her neighbors. She stated she is against the change.
Brian Bertenshaw, 4212 N. Verder: Mr. Bertenshaw stated that he was for the
change. Mr. Bertenshaw stateti he worlcs for the owner who has requested this
change. Mr. Bertenshaw stated that the owner was trying to clean up the properties,
like he had done with the ones he owns that are located out on Argonne. Mr.
Bertenshaw shared that, Mr. Raugust is a local owner who is trying to make the area
better, like they have seen in other areas with transitional housing.
Dennis Raugust, Spangle, WA: Owner of Bolder Creek and awns the office
buildings on Argonne that abut these properties and has recently acquired these 5
parcels. Mr. Raugust stated that he, his son, Ryan, and tiesr wh chnhad beent nh g e~
and c leane d up the homes that were on the proper ,
disrepair, but there was extra property sfl they decided to build a retirement faciliry.
Mr. Raugust stated he feit that these types of facilities were becoming more and more
important to the community. Mr. Raugust stated that several people made the , i
Page 2 of 5
05/2212008 Planning Commission P~linutes
suggestion to him to think of putting in this type of facility based on the needs in the
area.
Greg Mott, 8907 E Alki: Mr. Mott stated that he felt that this would ruin the
neighborhood. It would affect the wildlife as well as the open spaces. Mr. Mott stated
that sflme of the historic homes in the neighborhoad were of the first built in the area.
Mr. Mott stated that he felt that allowing this change to the area will only allow for
further changes which will be bad for the neighborhood.
Seeing no one else who wished to testify, Commissioner Beaulac closed the public
hearing at 6:32 p.m. Commissioner Carroll made a motion to recommend approval of
CPA-03-08 to the City Council, second by Commissioner Sharpe. ARer discussion
regarding access and transition zoning, the Commissioners voteri four to one in favor
of the recommendation with Commissioner Beaulac being the negative vote.
Mr. N9cCormick, Planning Manager, then explained to the Commissioners that a change
to the Use Matrix, Appendix 19-A, to allow dupleac and single family residences in Mixed
Use Corridor and Corridor Mixed Use zones, needed to be added in order to complete
that mixed use feel. He also stated this was an oversight when the Uniform
Development Gode was originally adopted. Commissioner Kogle made a motion to
recommend approval of amending A.ppendix 19-A'of the UDC to the City Council,
second by Commissioner Sands, vote is unanimous. .
Mr. McCormiclc stated that in the text amendments for Chapter 2, Land Use of the
Comprehensive Plan, there was a reference to Map 2.2. At the time Mr. McCormick
stated that was a typo and would be corrected but after further investigation it was
discovered that staff had created a new map, Map 2.2 Future Possible Annexation
~ Areas. Mr. McCormick talked about how the map related to the amended text in
Chapter 2 of the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Sands made a motion to
recommend approval of Mlap 2.2 to the Ciry Council, seoond by Commissioner Kogle,
vote is unanimous. '
New Business - Public Hearings on CPA-07-08 and CPA-08-08:
Commissioner Beaulac opened the public hearing at 6:52 p.m. Senior Ptanner, Mike Basinger, made a presentation regarding CPA-07-08 which is
located at the northwest corner of 3r0 and Carnahan. Mr. Basinger stated what is
surrounding the site and the proposecl change to Communiry Commercial.
CPA-07-08 located at the southwest corner of 6' and Sullivan. Requested change is
from Low Density Residential to Office.
Dwight Hume, 9101 N. Mt. View Lane: Mr. Hume testified that this property is
owned by Mr. Tombari and that he would like to change it to something that is more
transitional and useful tfian residential, it is the last pieoe before the freeway access.
Mr. Hume also said that the use will be a low intensity use due to its IocaUon ne,xt to
the residential area.
Commissioner Sands made a motion to recommend approval of CPA-07-08 to the City
Council, second by Commissioner Sharpe, vote is unanimous in favor.
Senior Planner Basinger made a presentation regarding CPA-08-08, which is lacated
at Century and Sullivan at 6h Ave. Proposal is to change from Low density residential
to Office.
Brian Prior, 15319 E 8~': Mr. Prior stated he was the pastor of the church behind the
~ property and he was curious as to what was going to be happening on the property
05/22/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 5
i
because it backs up to his church's property and they have young Families with children
and are planning a school for the back of the property.
Dwight Hume, 9101 N. Mt. View Lane: Mr. Hume pointed out the surrounding
uses and designations and that the difference between office and garden office would
still be transitional with the adjacent zoning and facing away from the residential zones
as well as the church sifie.
Seeing no one else tivho wishes to testify Commissioner Beaulac closed the public
hearings on both CPA-7-08 and CPA-08-08.
Commissioner Sharpe made a motion to recommend approval of CPA-08-08 to the City
Council, second by Commissioner Kogle. Commissioners question the staffi on the
height regulation difference between the Office and the Garden Office zone. Staff's
response is 100 feet for Office and 45 Feet for Garden Office are the limitations.
Commissioners were concerned about the heights in the area regarding the
surrounding uses. Mr. McCormick stated that based on the size of the parcel and other
constraints that the heights would not be an issue, but that the allowed uses were
more flexible in an Office zone over the Garden Office zone, and the market is not
conducive to building a 100 foot building in the valley.
Vote is three to tx^ro, motion fails, musf have four votes to pass a Comprehensive Plan
amendment. Commissioner Kogle made a motion to recommend approval to the City
Council CPA-08-08 with a Office land use designation and a Garden Office zoning.
Vote is unanimous.
Old Business - Deliberation session for the Sprague Appleway Corridors ~ Subarea Plan. Items of discussion during this week's deliberation meeting covered
the follawing subjects.
Neighborhood Centers:
• A~gonneJDishman Mica - remove fhe 4 parcels north of 4~' Ave, east of
Dishman Mica from the plan area.
• Pines - bring the NC up to Main from Perrine to Houk, add south to 1s, Ave
from Rabie to Houk
. McDonald - no changes
. Evergreen - no changes
• Sullivan - no changes
Building uses:
• Added retail carts-sales to City Center, hot dog carts, ice cream carts
• Changed sidewalk seating to adjacent to the building
• Health and exercise clubs, strike on upper floors only, strike health/exercise
clubs as a prohibited use on the ground fioor
• AddEd farmers markets and other seasonal sales
• Neighborhood commercial, conditional use, banks with a drive through
• Mixed Use Avenue, added auto parts under medium box store,
• Strike industrial use ..-J
05/22/2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 5
~
• Add light industrial - such as technology, soffi,vare, plastic injection molding
(thermoplastic) - make a notation about excessive noise, smell and vibration
• Add pharmacy in Neighborhood Center with conditional use
• Added warehousing as long as only 30% of the business
• Remove the crematorium from the funeral home notation
• Gateway Commercial Ave, make conditional uses permitted uses,
• Added RV, motorcycle, AN, bQat sales permitted
• Add industrial as a prohibited use
• Gateway Commercial Center - Removed the'auto-themed' part of restaurants
added language from City Center regarding eating and drinking establishments
and entertainment establishments in good taste - concern that it could
compete with the City Center. •
• Permit motels with a oommon entry, • C'hanged housing with dwellings to be consistent with fihe rest of the
development code. Commissioner Kogle made a motion to extend the meeting to 9:05. The motion was
setonded and passed unanimously.
• Change the standards for attached dtivellings to not have to conform to the
Planned Residential Development standards by minimum developrnent size or
a latsizes.
X. GOOD OF THE ORDER ,
Commissioner Carroll asked if there would be a way for the commissfoners to get a
dacument with the changes marked in it so they don't have to go back and forth
between differenfi documents and only have to worry about having one to worry about.
Staff stated they would work on providing this.
XI. AD)OURNMENT
, ne being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 9:03 p.m.
SUBMITTED: ' APPROVED:
Deanna Griffith, Administrative Assistant Fred Beaulac, Vice-Chairperson
05/22J2008 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 5
i
S#6ka-
,;OoValley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager, Mike Jackson, Deputy City Manager; City Council
From: Mike Basinger, AICP - Senior Planner
Date: June 24, 2008
Re: CPA-03-08
On JunE 3, 2008, the City Council held a review session on the proposed Comprehensive
Plan Amendments for the 2008 annual update. At the review session, City Council had
additional questions on CPA-03-08 in relation to Section 17.80.140H (Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Approval Criteria) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC).
Staff has provided supplemental information for the following findings and factors to clarify
the Planning Commission's recommendation, some of which is reiterated in the staff report
under III.A and III,B. -
Findin4 1a: The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment.
Staff Response: The City's adopted policies of the Comprehensive Plan state in part "the
economic development strategy is to promote a more diverse economy [that] would achieve
a better balance between jobs, housing and support the City's desired quality of life."
(Section 2.3.1) The proposed amendment offers additional opportunities to achieve the
balance by expanding the land-use area available for further diverse developrnent. This
supports the welfare of the community by providing additional employment opportunities.
Specifically, this proposal, as Office, can serve a variety of functions including acting as a
transition area that tends to generate less traffic and noise and is smaller in scale than
industrial, commercial, and higher density residential uses. The safety and health of the
community can be protected by providing transition areas that buffer differing land-uses, so
that similar land-uses are allowed to develop contiguously. Design regulations, which
provide adequate transition between different uses, will be essential in preserving both
existing and new development.
The stated comprehensive plan goal of the office designation is to °create appropriate
developrnent standards [which] allow comrnercial, residential, and recreational uses in
conjunction with permitted uses in Office designated areas." (LUG-8, LUP-8.1) The
creation of contiguous parcels with a definitive boundary (the street) ensures that the future
development will provide an appropriate mix of permitted uses acting transitionally between
the residential neighborhood and the corridor development.
~
~ ~
The proposal has had an environmental review under the SEPA process and a
Determination of Non-significance was issued indicating that the proposed comprehensive
plan change has no significant environmental effects. This determination was not appealed.
The applicant for this Comprehensive Plan Amendment has indicated that he will develop
the property for elderly housing. Many seniors, and most of those over 75, require some
level of in-home senrices, a need that increases with advancing age. A continuum of care
that makes available in-home services, progressing through assisted living congregate care
and Iong-term facilities should be located near medical and community services and
shopping.
Proximity and access to medical services and shopping is important to senior citizens, who
are likely to be more dependent on family, friends, and public transit service than other
sectors of the population.
Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) policies support the proposal as follows:
HP-1.6 Encourage the development of housing for seniors and other special populations
along transit corridors and within walking distance of shopping and medical facilities'.
Findina 1 b: The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter
36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City adopted plan not affected by the amendment.
Staff Response; The Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCV1) does not directly
~ address site specific changes at the local jurisdiction level; however the GMA does contain
state-wide planning goals that provide the basis for local comprehensive plans that do
provide some guidance.
State Wide Planning Goals:
Goal 1: Urban Growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public
facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner.
Goal 4: Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments
of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types,
and encourage preservation of existing housing stock.
Approval of the requested comprehensive plan amendment would meet both state-wide
planning goals cited above. Goal 1 encourages the development of urban areas where
public facilities exist to serve the proposed development. The proposed location is served
by all necessary urban senrices and provides for appropriate in-fill development with the City
of Spokane Valley. The City has adopted development regulations that are designed to
address specific impacts related to new development such as off-street parlcing,
landscaping, lighting, setbacks and height and bulk limitations. New development on the
subject property would also likely trigger review under the State Environmental Policy Act
(SEPA). SEPA provides a tool for the City to evaluate specific impacts from a proposed
development and require conditions or restrictions necessary to address the potential
impacts from new development that are not adequately dealt with by the City's development
~ regulations.
i
i
The requested Garden Office zoning district does provide for certain types of housing, _ i
specifically assisted living facilities. These facilities provide a housing type that is becoming
increasingly in demand given the number of persons at or near retirement age. The 2000
federal census revealed that 14% of the Spokane Valley population was 65 or older and that
over 20% of the City's population was in the 45 to 64 year age cohort. This trend is
expected to continue and potentially increase in the 2010 census.
Findinq 1c: The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions
beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property
lies.
Staff Response: The City's Interim Comprehensive Plan designated the Argonne and
Mullan corridors as Mixed Use Area. Mixed Use Areas were intended to enhance travel
options, encourage development of commercial uses, higher-density residences, office,
recreation, and other uses. Implementing zones for Mixed Use Areas under the adopted
Phase 1 Development Regulations implementing the Interim Comprehensive Plan were
Urban Residential-12 (UR-12), Urban Residential-22 (UR-22), Neighborhood Business (B-
1), Community Business (B-2), and Industrial Paric (I-1). The zoning of the corridor was
mostly Community Business (B-2).
The City of Spokane Valley's adopted Comprehensive Plan designated the Argonne and
Mullan corridors as Office. The Office Cornprehensive Plan designation is intended primarily
for office development with limited retail or commercial uses. The proposed amendment to
Garden Office responds to Office Comprehensive Plan designation intentions for -
development in the Argonne and Mullan corridor. The Garden Office zoning designation will provide for a transition between the Office designation intended for rnedium to high-rise
office development and the residential neighborhood.
Findinp 2a: The effect upon the physical environment.
Staff Response: The comprehensive plan amendment request is a non-project action under
SEPA. At the time of the submittal of the commercial building permit application, an
additional SEPA review will be required to evaluate the impacts of the use and proposed
structure on the physical environment.
Finding 2c: The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods
Staff Response: At the project level, an environmen4al review will be performed. The
applicant will be required to adhere to the zoning standards and uses referenced in Chapter
19.60 and Appendix 19-A and the development standards specified in Chapter 22 of the
Spokane Valley Municipal Code. It should be noted that even this property was zoned
residential, this property could be developed as a school, church, or daycare with similar or
greater impacts to the neighborhood.
Finding 2e: The benefrt to the neighborhood, City, and region.
Staff Response: The Comprehensive Plan states that the Office designation is intended
primarily for low-to-high rise office development with limited retail or commercial uses. '
Several developments within the Argonne/Mullan Couplet, Pines Road, and Evergreen
Road corridors embody good design and are representative of desired future offiice
~ development. The project is adjacent to properties that front Argonne Road. At time of
development, standards in Title 22 (Design and Development Standards), specifically 22.70
(Fencing, Scresning, and Landscaping) will reduce impacts on adjacent properties by
providing visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. The Comprehensive
Plan recommends integrating sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office
areas to provide a safe and attractive working environment. There are existing sidewalks on
Argonne Road. Traffic from the proposed use shall be directed from Marguerite Road via
Alki Avenue to Argonne Road and not routed through the adjoining neighborhood.
Findinc2f: The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and
density and the demand for such land.
Staff Response: 373 acres of land is designated Office in the Comprehensive Plan, of
which 121 acres is zoned Garden Office. This accounts for 41 percent of the total land
designated Office in the Comprehensive Plan. 7he Office designation along the Argonne
and Mullan corridors was implemented to eradicate "strip commercialn along the corridors,
and ultimately allow for redevelopmen4 under the office designation. The proposed
amendment will support new office development along the Argonne corridor.
~
,
-
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent (D old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ informalion ❑ admin. report Z pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 08-012, Official Zoning map amendments
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A (Growth Mlanagement Act)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTIO CPAO-~1-08ethrouyh8C A 08-08 aA staff memoh address ng Cou ci
comprehensive plan map amendments
questions on CPA-03-08 is attached.
BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle t
year, plcations
with a
from November 2 to N emeber 1 deadlineWl n latef w nt elea Planning of I the considers
received prior to the No
recommendation to City Council in late springJearly summer.
All parts of the Comprehensive Plan (maps and text) can be amended during the annual cycle. The
Community Development Department received eight requests from the public for site-specific Comprehensive
Caceive lan amendments for 2008. Sites that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan PVlap amendment automatically
a zoning designation that is consistent with the new Comprehensive Plan Map designation.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS: Comprehensive plan map arnendment proposals
are organized into individual reports consisting of application materials, staff reports, comprehensive plan
maps, zoning maps, aerial maps, vicinity maps, transportation maps, and letters submitted to date to assist the
City Counc+l's review.
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on May 8, 2008, to consider proposed
the Commission
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan Land Use map. After hearing public testimony,
made recommendations on CPA-01-08, CPA-02-08, and CPA-04-08 through CPA-06-08. Further research
was requested on CPA-03-08. On May 22, 2008, the Planning Commission deliberated on CPA-03-08 and
held a hearing on CPA-07-08 and CPA-08-08. After hearing public testimony, the Commission made
recommendations on CPA-03-08, CPA-07-08, and CPA-08-08.
OPTIONS: Advance the ordinance to a second reading; remand to Planning Commission for further
consideration; or conduct a public hearing on proposed deviations from the Planning Commission's
recommendation.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: Advance ordinance 08-012 to a second reading
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Division Manager, PUlike Basinger, AICP, Senior
Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Draft Ordinance 1of1
0 C1TY QF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOK.ANE CUIJNTY, VI'ASHING'Z'QN
QRDINANCE NO. 08-012
AN ()RDINANCE OF THE C1TY nF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUiNTY
WASHMGTQN, AMEVI)IIIG ORDTNANCE 07-015 `VH:CCH AllOPTED `rHF
OFFTCIAL 70NING N1Al:'; AND PROVT.DING F'OR OTHER MATTLRS .
PROPFRLY RFLATING TtIFRETO.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adoptcd Land Use plans aod regulations as set
forth in the Sgokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) and the City of Spokane Valley Zoni.ng
Map thzough Orclinance No. 07-015; and ,
VVFIFR.EAS, the V►'ashington State Growth,' Management Act (GMA) allnws
comprehensive plans ta be amendcd annually (R.CW 36.70A 130); and VVjI:ER.LAS, amendments to the City of . Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan may be
initiated by the 1'lanning Commission (Commission),= the City (:ouncil ((:ouncil) or by thc
Communit}, Development L7i.rector based on citizen requests ar when chanted conditions
warra.nt adjustments; ancl
WHEREAS, the GMA requires.., "comprehensive plans tio be implcuiented N;ith
o development regulations, including the ronin; of property consistent with land use map
designations; and . z . WHEREAS, zcine changes: under consideration with the annual Comprehensive Plan
amendlnents are to beoonsidcred as.area-wicie rezones pursuant to 17.80.140 of the SVMC; and
AAFHEREAScon.sisierit "u1th -t}ie GhA, City of Spokane Vallcy adUpted Public
Parlicipation Guideliries to ciirect the public- involvement process for adoptuig and amending
comprehensive plans and area-wide rerones; and
ArFiER.h: AS, the Comprehensive Plan pravides that amendment applications shall be
received uiitil November 1 of each year; and
RHEREAS;. applicafions were submitted by the applicant, oNvner or by City staff to
amend the Comprehcnsive Plan and Zoning Nlaps for the purpose vf beneficially using the
properly described hcrein; and
WHEREAS, following the aPFlication to the City, staff conducted an environmental
revicw to deten-nine the p4tcntial emTiron.mental impacts from thc proposed amendmcnts; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the Environmental Checklists, staff issued a Determuiation
of N onsignif canGe (DNS) for t:he proposals; publi.shed the T)NS in the Valley Ne-v<<s Herald,
posted the D-NIS on the sites and mailed khe 17NS lo all afEeeted public agencies; and
[lydinance 08-0 12 7.,oning Map Changes Y1b~ ~ of 6
i
,I
V1'IlERtisAS, the Commissian conducted a briefing on vtap l., 2008, to review the
praposeti atnendments, a.nd ~
WHER.EAS, notice uf tEie Commission public hearing was publishcd in the Valley 'Nlews
lIerald at least 14 days prior to the hearing; ancl
WHERFAS, nn April 23, 2008, notice of the CommissiUn hearing xvds mailed to all
propcrty owners within 400 fECt of the subject property ; and
WI-E12FAS, nptice af the hearing was posted on the subject properiy; and
WI-IERLqS, the Com.mission rcce.ived evideuce; infoi-rimation, public tcstimony and a
staff report and recommendation at a public hearing an May 9; 2008; and
N4714EKEAS, the Com.mission conducted a public hearing on May 8, 2008, lU considEr
proposed amendments to the Compzehcnsive Plan L'and Use 1'l,an map and Zoning map. After
heacing public testimony; the Commission made fecommendatians on CPA-Ol -081CPA-02-08,
and CPA-04-08 through CYA-06-08. Further research was requested on Ck'A-03 :08. The
Commission continued the public he.aring te May 22; 2008 for CPA-03-0$, C'PA-07-08; and
CPA-08-0$; ar►d ' .
.
'WHER,FAS, thc Commission delitierated on^CPA-03-0$, CPA-07-08, and CYA-08-08 on _
May 22, 2008; thE Commission r.ecammendEd aPpro~~al of al.l prece~iing amendments; and
WHEREAS, on Jurie 3, 2008, Council reviewed the proposed amendments; and
WHEREAS; on June 10, 2008, Council considered a fust ordinance reaciing to adopt the
proposed amenciments and public c4mment ti>>as allowed; and
. _ , .
WHERLAS, on June 24; 2008, Colincil cqnsidered a second Ardi.nance reading at which
time public coniment wa's- allowed and Gauncil apProvF:d Nvritten finclings af fact setting fortli,
their basis for recommending approval of the proposed ameudments.
NUW; TTTEIZLFORE, lhe City Council nf the City 41' Spokane Valley da ordain as
~ • t _ .
follows:
Section 1. 1'urpcise. Thc purpose of tbis 4rdinance is to amend the (7fficial Zoning
Ivlap adopted thxough Qrdi.nance No. 07-015 in order tca permit the property describcd hercin to
bc used iu a matter consistent with the same.
Sectic►n 2. Findin s. The City Coune:il aclcnowledges tbat the Coriunission cvnducted
appropriate investigation and study; held a public hearina on the application and recommends
approval of the amendmcnt to the 7..oning maps. T`he City Council hereby adopts Che findines of
the Comm.ission, sriecifically lhat:
i
Ordinxnce 08-012 7onin-a Map Changes Pxge 2 of 6
Sec:tioa 2. 1;indings. =Che City . Council acknowlcdges tEiaC the Commission conducted
appropriate investination and study, beld a public heari.ng on the application and recommends
approval of the amcndmcnts to the Comprebensive Alan map and text. Ifie City Council hereby
aciopts the findiugs of the Com.mission, specifically that:
1, Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on April
23; 2008 and each site was postcd,"ith a"Notic.e of Public Hcaring" sign,,with a description of
the proposal.
2. Individual notice of the map amendment prvposals was mailed to all property owners within 400
feet af each affected site. 3. Pursuaut eo the State EnNironmental Policy Act (SEPA - RCR' 43.21 C) environmental checklists
were required for each proposed cornprehensivc plan map and text amendment.
4. Staff reviewed the environmental checldists and a threshold determinalion was made for eflch
comprebensive plan ainendment reyuest. Taeterminati.ons of Non-significance (DNS) were
issued for the requested camprehensive plan amencl`nients on February 15, 2008.
5. The DNS's were published in the city's official uewspaper on February 15, 2008 consistent with
the City of Spokane Valley EnvironmEntal Oidiriance.
C_ The Spokane Valley I'lanning Coumlissian conducted.a pulilic hearing Un MaY 8, 2008, to
consider the proposed amendments. After heari.ng public.testimony, the Commissivn made
recaminendations on CPA-0 1-08 ttiru CI'A-15-08, eacludi.ng CYA-03-08, Cl'A-07-08, and CPA-
08-08. r
'
7. The Commission conlinued the public hearing for CYA-03-0$ to May 22, 2008. llue to a
~ nOticinQ crror; C:FA-07-08 and CFA-08-08 ~~va-~ beard on Nlay 22, 2408 to ensure consistcncy
,"ith 1 itle 17.$0120B. 8. On May 22; 2008, the. Coriimission made recommendations on CPA-03-08, CPA-07-08, and
. ,
CPA-08-08. - . .
9 r},e pla„ning goals"of the GioNvth Management Act (GMA) were consider.ed and the
prUposed amendment5. are consistent with the GMA.
10.1he goals and policics-o'f the Spokane Vallcy'Comprehensive P1an were considerecl and the
proposed amendments aze. consistent witli thc Comprehensive Ylan.
11. "rhe propased land usc and zon.ine designations are consistent with the current use of the
properties.
12. Findi.ngs werc made and, factors . were considered to ensure conlplianGe Nti1th Section
17.80J40 H. (Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria) of the SVMC.
13. The Comprehensive 1'lan Land Use Map amenclments urill not adversely af-fect the public's
general health,,safety; and wel{-are.
,
Sectir,n 3. Pro. er . The properties subject to this drdinance are described in the
attached Attachmcnt'"A."
Section 4. Map almendments• Put'sLlant to RCW 35A_.63.073, the City of Spokane
Valley 7oning Map as adoPfed tli.raugh Qrdinance No. 07-015, is he~r~ee amended
bed as follo on
the attached Attaehment "A." `1 he 7oning map amendments are g~ Y des
Man Amcndments
1'age 3 of 6
r,..1:.,a.rP (1R~112 ZOILlle Map Chan;es
i
~
~
+
File No. CPA-41-08: - - - -
APplication/Description of Propnsal: Zoning map amendment from Si.ngle-fam.ily Residential
L7istrict (R-3) and Sinele-fauiily Residential Urban iaistrict (R-4) to Medium 17ensity Multi-
family Residential Taistrict (MF-1) on appzoximately 2.07 acres of land. I
Applieant: Greg A.rger, 300 Nor.lh Nlullen Koaci, Suite 204, Spokane Valley; WA 99206
~
Amcndment Location: South of Mission l-lvenue on Mamer Road at 1204 North Mamer Road
and 111.2 North MamE.r Road; specifically located in Che NE of Section 15; ToAmsbip 25
North, Range 44 EWI`2; parcel number(s) 45151.0926 and 45151.1216, Spokane Valley,
Washington.
Council Decision: Change to Meriium llensity Multi-family Rcsidential District
File No. CFA U2-08:
ApplicationlDescription of Proposal: Goning maP amendment t:rom Sing1e-family Rcsiciential
Suhurban 17istrict (12-2) to Corridor Mixed iJse District (CN1Ln on approximaLtcly .23 acres of
,
land. ` ~VA 99202
Applicant: Joc Stoy, c/o ~3aker Construction, 2711:East SpraD e Avenue, Spokane,
Amendment Location: Norih of Trent Avemie'(SR290) at 8124 Fast Carlisle Avenue;
specifically locatecl in the NW 14 of Section 7, lownship 25 Noilh, Range 44 FW1V1; parcel
number 45472.7003, Spokane Valley, Washington. .
Council necision: Change to Corridor Mixed Use -
File No. CPA-03-08: Further research was requcsted '
Application/lleseripdon of Proposal: 7oning map amendment frnm Single-famil)' Residential •
llistrict (R-3) and Single-fa►nily Residential Urban Taistrict (R-4) io Garden Office (GO) on
approximately 3.1 acres of land. .
Applicant: Dennis RauDust, c/o k3oulder Creek,-lnc., 19012 Nevada lt.nad, Spaxigle; VJA 99033
Amendmeut Location: Southeast corner of the iutErsection of Marguerite Road and A1ki
Avenue addressed as 8902 East Allki Aveciue, 420 NTOrth Marguerite Roaci; 500 North Margucrite
Ttoad, 508 'North iMarguerite Rodci and 51.0 North M.argucrite 12oad; spccifieally loc:atetl in the
SE'/a of Section.l_8, Tbwnship 25 Nortb,l2ange 44 EWM; parcel number(s) 45184.0804,
45184.0805, 45184.0$07,45184.0819 and 45184.0820, Spokane Valley, Washington.
CouncilPecision: (;hange.to Garden Office
~ ~
File No. CYA4)4-08
APplication/Deticription of Proposal: 7_,oning maP aanendment i'rom Corridor Mixed Use
(CMU) to Vlulti-fainily Nleciitim Densit}, Residential lllistrict (Iv9F-1) on aPproximately 3.0 acres
. :
of land. - ~ ~
Applicant: Stephen H. rord & Victor N. Cooper
Amendment Lncatiuu: The proposal is located south of Spranue Avenue on TscSirley Street at
120 S. Tschirley, 106 S. 7'schirley and parcel to the north of 106 S. °1 schirley; specifically
loeateci in Che NW `/4 of Section 19, Towmslup 25 North, Range 45 EWiV1; parcel numbers
55192.9029, 55192.9051, and 55191.9052, Spvkaue Valley, Washington.
Council Dccision: Change to Multi-family Medium Density Rcsictent'ial District
Fi.le No. CPA-05-08
i
n-l:.unrP nX-(117. ZOllltlp- vl8p Cl1c1DgE:S F'age 4 of 6
APPlic.ation/Deseriptian of Proposal: 7on.i-ng maP amendment from Single-family Residential
District (R-3) to Garden Office (GO) on approa.imately 1.56 acres of land.
Applicant: 1 NJ on Broadway, LLC
Amendment Location: The proposal is located betvveen Cataldo and Broadway Avenues east
of Pines at 11901 L. Broadway Ave; specifically located in the NE `/4 pf Section 16, I ownship
25Nortb, RaaDe 44 EWM; parcel number 45161.1171, Spokane Valley, Washington•
C«uncil Decision: Change to Garden Office
Filc No. CPA-46-08 ' Rcsidential
Applicatii~n/Deseription nf Yropusal: Zoning map amendment frhui Single-family
District (R-3) to Uarcien Office (GO) on approacimately 4.82 acres of land•
Applicant: Nick Abariotes
Amendment T..ocation: lhe proposal is located betwcen Cataldo and"F3roadway Avcnues east
of Pines at 11813 E. Broaciway Ave; specifically located in theNE 1/< of Section 16, Township
25 Nlorth, Range 44 EWM; parcel number 45161.1127, Spokane Valley, Washington.
Council Aecisiun: Change to Garden Office File No. CPA-07-08 ~
ApplicationlDescriptic►n of ProposaL• Loning map amendment from Single-family Ttesidential
Urban llistrict (R-4) to Community CoTfimercial(C) on approximately 1.24 acres of land.
Applicant: ' , -
~ Dwight J. Hume . :
A.mendment Location: _ • ~
Northwest of the intersection of Carnahan Koad anci 3~a - Avc- nue at 228 S.Carnahan Koa~cel
specifica]ly lncated in the Nu"14 of Section 23,~'o~~nstup 25-?~Torth Range 43 LRTNi; p
number 35232.1509, Spokane Vallcy, Washington.
Council necision:, Change to Gommunih' Con'mercial
1 .
. .
File No. CPA-08-08 ' . -
ApplicatianlDuscriVtion nf Yropos~l: 7oning map amen. dmeni t'rom Single-family Resident.ial
District (0,-3) to Uffcc (Q) on approx,imately 1.02 acres of land.
Applicant:
Dwight 7'. Hume .
Amcnclmcnt Location:
r.ast of Sullivan Road and onelot north of Century Avenue at 604 S. Sull'L` ~oad~i cl~bnule
l.vcated in the T~TF~;'/~. c~f Section 23; Township 25 North, Range 44 , P
452312244, Spokane Valley, Wa.shingtan.
Council Decision: Change to Garclcn Uf.fice
5ection 5. Loning NIaplOfficial Conirols. 1'ursuaat to RCVV3~e Com0rchensive
purpose of regulating the use of. land and to unplement aud give affect t~ prp
plan the City hereby aniends thc Official Zoning Map of tlie City as set forth in Attachmcn
"A»
~ Section 6. Adoption of ()ther I:.aws. To ttle extent that any provision of the SVN1C,
or any other law, rule or rcgulation rcferenced in the attaehed 7oning Map(s) is necessary or
~'aee 5 of 6
nt1 rl....:..n ~.tflnC'hannes v
. convenient to establish the validity; cnfor.ceability or interpretation af the Gonin„ Map(s), ttien .
such provision of the SViv1C; or other law, rule hr regulation is hercby adopteci by rcference.
Section 7. Mdp - Conies on Fi1e-Administrative Aetion. Tbe 7~aning Ivlap is
maintained in the office of the City Clerk as well as the City Dcpartcnent nf Community
Devclopment. '1'he City Manager or designee, rollowing adnption of th.is Ordinance, is
authorized to modify the 7oning Map i.n a manner consistent with this Ordinance.
Section 8. Liabilily. '1`hc express intent o.f.' the City of Spokane Valley is khat the
responsibility for compliance vNrith the provisions of tlus ordindncc shall zest A7th die permil
applicant ancl thcir agents. This ordi.nanee and its Provisions are aciUpted Nvith the express intent
to protcct the health, safety, and wclfare of the eeneral public and are nol intended to pratect any
partic;ular class of individuals or organizations. •
Section 9. Severability. If any section, sentence; clause or phease of this ordinance
shaLl be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of cc~mpetEnt jurisdiction, such
invalidity c~r unconsti tutionality shall not affect ~ the validity or constitutionality o'F any other
sectiou; sentence, clause, or phrase of this ordinance.
SecNon 1 Q. F H:ective L7ate. This Ordinance shall.: he i.n fiull force a.nd e5ect five (5)
days after publication ol` this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the
City of Spokane Valley as provided by law.,. , -
PASSEL7 by the City Council this day of June, 2008 -
. ~ . ' , J . . .
Mayor, Itich Munson
A7'TEST: - - . • , .
City Clerk, Chrisline Bailibridge . . ,
Approvetl As To Fnrm: Office of the City Attqmey
Uate of Fublication:
Lffective Date:
i
Ordinance 08-012 '/.,oning Map Changes Page 6 of 6
ATTACHMENT A
ZONING MAPS
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
Ft-3
~
K o
CE
✓ ~
\SF-1 tj ~
~
~ a
Y
I
.i• S
~
~
a r_
CPA-01-08
-d R-;
_ ` - ~
. ~
l il-' (•1LT
~t J
R-3 ~ _ - -
~ - -
!►ff-3 _ _ - _
CF
~ R-3
b
~
CPA-0I-08 Rcquest: Change the Comprehensive Ptan map destgnatbn
City of Spolunc Vpl{rv }rom LDR to MDR; cdange zoning hom R-3 and R-d ro MF-1.
Coramunity Developmeot Depsrtment
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
_
- ~--=K4-
R-2 CF
ZL.
CPA-02-08
,
~
~E.t,:i•~.:
R-2
t_2 ~ R-3 -
CPA-02-08 Reqdest; Change tbe Comprcheasire Plan map daignatinn
City of SpakaAe Vallcy 6rom I.DR ta CMiJ; chenge ioning frnm R-2 to Cti1l'.
Communitv Devetopmcnt Departmeat
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
~
~-s-a,F•, .5 r--~ _
CPA-03-08 k-'
- -
i
--=~Ra-
\'1'est ~'atlc) ~ ~i`
Clh' SCf1c1Ul
rl
CF
~
~
i a
_ - ~
- G~
CPA-03-08 Reqaest: Chonge tiie Compre6ensive Plao map dtsignatian
City of Spokaoc Vslle}• from LDR to n: change zoning trom R-3/11-4 to GO.
Commuaity Drvtlopment Ikpartmcnt
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
~
\ G rernsc res \
\ 11kJdk
m
y
\
CPA-04-0$ CF ~ `
~
~
~ \ =~.i~~
,
~
•
a-3
CPA-0408 Reqnest: Change the Comprehtasive Ptae mop designatlan
City of Spokane VaIlev {nm C~1U to MDR; cbangc zoning frvm CMIr to MF-1.
Communfty Dcvciopmeat Departmeat
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
~
=-R4 ' - _
~ -
3
b st:► ~
- -
I
~ CPA-05-Q8
~
i
R•3 r ;
~i
♦
\IF-I
Cf
CPA•05-08 Request: C6poge the Comprcbeasivo Plan map designatbn
City otSpokaae Vailey trom LDR to O: changc zoaing from R-3 to GO.
Community [)cvdopment Departmcat
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
;
~ ~-R~-~G y - -
3
?
CPA-05-08 }
~
~ R•3
a
►
cF f
CF
li
PA-06-4$ Ktquest: Change the Compre5ensive Plao map designstion
C
City ulSpokane Valley trom LDR to O; chaagc zon[ng from R-3 to C.O.
Commnnity De►'e{opmeot Department
Exhibit 2: Zoning Map
k':
S uc
, 12
CPA-07-08
i
~
z-nd ,r,a
~
_ - - - - _ - - - k~
_ - _ _ _ - - - - --R-d_- (-F.
_ - -
3rd 3rc1 3rd
i
~
i ~,o w2Y%s n~
ALi
d:h
- - _ - - - 4 - - _
~ - - -
- - =L'
K
R-3 ■
R-3
CPA-07-08 Reyuest; ('hange t6e Compcchensive Plan map deseguation
City otSpoktnt VaUcy from LDR to C; c6aage zoning from R-4 to C.
Commnnity Dcve{opmcnt Ikpartmcnt
F.xhibit 2: Zoning Map
~
~
-
. ~
~
at:~ ~ 4'~'
~
N"C
ith M1fF-1
~ J
z
CPA-08-08
R-3
- - -ft=1~-
~ _ _
~ - _ -
M
~
>
~
Ctntral
valley.
Sentor Hizh
CPA-08-08 R~y~~; CDsnge the Comprrheaslvo Plan m~p dc~ignatioa
Cit~• of Spokane Yaliry from LDR to O; changc roning frum R-3 ta O.
F--~ nmmunity Development Depahmcat
C
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent H old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2009 - 2014 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP)
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six-year plans for
' coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Presentation of draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP at
Council's May 6, 2008, Study Session; Public Hearing of draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP at
Council's June 10, 2008, Regular Meeting.
BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public hea(ng
adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six
calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Secretary of
Transportation before July 1S` of each year. '
Staff presented to Council a draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP at the May 6, 2008, and June 10,
2008, Council meetings. The proposed 2009-2014 Six Year TIP represents an update to the
2008-2013 Six Year TIP adopted last year.
OPTIONS: 1) Adopt the Draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP as proposed, 2) Adopt the Draft 2009-
2014 Six Year TIP with revisions, or 3) provide additional direction to staff
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to adopt the 2009-2014 Six Year TIP as
presented.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed projects listed in the Draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP projects will be budgeted within the Street Capital Projects Fund, which has the
revenue resources to accommodate those projects identified as having secured funding. At the current level of projected revenues not all projects listed in the draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP can
be funded at this time.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, Senior Engineer;
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution 08-014; 2) Final Draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP; 3) Quick List of
Final Draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP projects; 4) Map of Final Draft 2009-2014 Six Year TIP
~ , .
~ RESOI.,U 1'Idd` NQ. 08-014
~ •
C1TY ON, SPOKANE VAL:LE Y
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHUqGT01'
A 1ZF.SOLUTlON Al)UPI'1NG IliE 2009-2014 T1tAi`tSPORTATlON
LNiPROVEMENT PROG12AN1 FOIt THE Cl l Y UI~~ :SYOKANE VALLEY
NVREREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary clevelopment of 1-hc street system within the
City of $pokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six-Year
Transportation Ir1iprovernent Prograni ("TIP") with such program acting as a guide for dle coordinated
dcvelopmcnt of the Ciry's transportatiori system; W-HEREAS, the TTP of the City shall specife4illy set forch fhose projects and proarams ofb4th
City and regional significance thzit benefit lhe transportacion system anc1 promote public saf'ery arid
efficient vehicle movements; .
WHEREAS, the TIP shall be consistent with the Ciry Comprehensive Plan and be adopted
following onc or more public hearings before the City Council;
1'VHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 10, 2008, for the purposc of
inviting and receivinj public comment on the proposed TIP; and
N(7W 1'HEREI+"OYZE, be it resdlved by the City Council of Che Ciry of Spokane Valley,
0 Spokane County, Washington, as follows:
The CiCy Council hereb}, adopts the att<iched T[.P for the City of $pokane Valley for the
purpose of guiding the design, clevelopment ancl cons/ruction of local and regional
transportation improvemen[s for che years 2009 through 2014. The City Clerk is directed
to file the 2009-2014 Six-Year Transportation I.mprovement Program with the
Washington Scate Secretary of Transportation not later than June 30. The TIP shall be
reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining thc work to be acc.omplished
under the program an(l the City transportaiion requiremcrits.
Adopted this 24TH day of June, 2008. Cit), of Spokane Valley
Richard Munson, Mayor
ATTrST:
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Ofiice oP the City Attorncy
CITY
0000,
p e
Vall ~
IIVC Y[AR ANNIVlN1AR11 O1 INCOR►ORATtOM
March 31, 2003 to March 31, 2008
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
FINAL DRAFT
2009 - 2014 Six Year
Transportation Improvement Program
Final Draft 2009 - 2014
nmr
~m Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
4;MillilIlloval7 ~ pMa-i in '14aufar4s
~ Funding
ProJect ! DescripUon ! Current Status LonQth PE RW CN Total saur+cos 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Tofal
Q Broaclway Avenue Satety Project- Pines(5R-27) z 74 25 934 933 cm' 15ieT
; to Park VAP 746 746
nnn Q Sldping Improvemerris to reduce acadents obtg 8roedwey Camdof
Fundmq Secured (118 8-3-20D8(003)-1)
Prolsct Total 833 933
1 PinesJMansfield 0.01 o o 1,796 1.79e cny zoe 206
WSOOT 10 10
S
Tpp 718 71a
Tnus proieq wtll reconllpuro the IM1 rampm al 1-90 st SR27. It wIU elso wldett and reconstrud Marutleid Ave fmm Dmrolop 212 212
l; jtIn1K RA. W SR27 to e 34ane madway wllh aab, guller end sklawelk, em
CMAO 463 463
Fundnp Secuced (71F1 tr3-E-032t016f-t ariA titi04-21) STA - 187 187
Projett Total 1.T86 1,796
2 Barkor Road Bridge 0 1 Q 0 4,159 4,159 BR 3,631 3.631
S cuy 204 204
OtAor 324 324
Rcplace D►tdge t5503 C Spoknrw. Rlwr
FwxlKig 5ecured • Clly fuMing tor ConUngerticy - -
Prolect Total 4,169 4,158
3 Appleway/SpraguelDishman-Mica ITS -190 to 2-W o o 373 3i3 ctry 5o so
s Dishman Mica CM►Q 323 3:3
WSDOT
Upgrade signel contropers a1201rrtersacrions. inetal cordull nrxl flber cable and conne.ct to SRTMC ceWAt systcm.
F„riding secu►ed csRrc os-z.~~
ProjeM Totel 373 3T3
ProJncb ond Inrherrna kisnEllsA In OM 7iP +m In be con&MlerW efkules only Ilyt rtmy Ghanpe Que to s vsrsly of cirWmsumn. on
are nol YrhrrMee by sr Ciry b be eapsd aPa+ W ProDedY aNriers w dwMloDen n mskiVdrwbpmeN dsctuom
~,t1 '12008 Page I
T~„f-~ ~ Final Draft 2009 - 2
~W Six-Year Transportation Improvemeni Program
~%1ey UvOars in Thouaands Funding
ProJoct! Descriptlcn f Cument Sfatus Length PE RW CN Tolal Sour^cea 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
4 STEP Paveback o r) n 4.299 4.2aB ciry t:t+> 1 2a+ t.z-)a a,dea
SW 704 I'!; 195 589
S
Fufl-tiMUth pavinq ancl [trainaqe? a=.5or.ialad wlih ;rnkane Cc,urlty's eTGP
Funding Snu~ed - Ciry Fuids _
Prqoct Totai 1,500 1,389 1,389 4.29e
5 gtreet pf@tgryatipn projeCt - VBNOUS StrBel 0 539 0 10,612 11,053 Criy 1,224 11,224 1,224 2.261 2,260 2.290 10,463
5 gyy 69 69 f,a 131 131 131 Goo
Annual 7trQet pfCtServAIiOn pLt0!eCiS
Fil(1dII1Q S8Q/Hd' Clty F1nA6
Pm)oc! Totsl 1,393 1,293 1,293 2,392 2.341 2,391 11,063
d Broadway Ave 180 fl E. o! Moore to flora 0-73 o eo 1.708 1.7sa cnY 12 342 sm
S UAP 4A 1.368 1.111
Reconstnici 6 widFn 9rnaAwny In 3-Jane settlnn 180 11 o( Moore tU Flora
rLmding Seuared fT1B 06-E-208(001)-1) -
ProJoct Tohl 60 1.70e 1.768
T AppFeway - Un'weraity to Evcrgreen 2.02 477 3,318 7.734 11.530 Cfly 121 208 448 776
p sTV sae 1.040 2.626 4.075
WSOOT 4 3 400 467
E7ciCIM AQpIBW71y B111f1. 1MM R Tllrl-IM! fBAIy ind1Id111Q CI1fhE Antl SIdQmACR. UCP 4200 4.200
Othor 403 1.610 2A13
Soaned 8TP(U) (1142 rt+ll), W9a0T
Projw:t Totnl 937 2,869 7.714 11.610
f rojecte aM lime!rAmd ¢Mnti!od In ttto Tlt-, ara !u bc cortskloral o5'imatos only Iflnt rnnY =hnngF: cl„e ,o e vnretp o• , r-.uns13ncee. nrv
srs nal eNenOeo by U+e CAp b De nMiw u0Q^ M proPwM owmn a dtvsbPNK am rt+atlnp develnpmeru efecisux+s
6t170008 PeW 2
Final Draft 2009 - 2014
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
,;oO,•~Hey nan.tz,n rnewu„w.
Fundfng
Project ! Descriptlon / Curtant Status Length PE RW CN Total Souraea 2009 2010 2011 2(12 2013 2014 Total
o WSDOT Urban Ramp Projects - BroadwAy, " 11 B 30!) '300 cny 300 soo
f, Argonne, Freyn I!C
Pivemenf Aetwn nl iri cc-nJunr_linm vhth VISDO' Z,,rnp {iru{ccls
Proj9tt Total 300 300
g PineslSpraguo Intersectlan PCC o 76 o 857 742 ctry 152 162
STA 59i1 590
Rop1sce psphnfl pavemenl vnth ri-ortland cemr,rrt r.nnuete pivemenl.
fundinq secured • Sl'A 0.3'f6 sates cax leu)+ approved
Projott Tobl 742 742
10 44tfi Ave Pathway: Sands to Woodruff 1.08 o 0 329 32e cny aa a~
S STP(E) 284 284
.tsphnq Patfrray vN bike I.ines ebng roed
S;N f"unAviq tieamed • DL1ey to 2009 10 GoDnfinRte Nd Cou1Ny Sewot projed - -
Ptoject Tohl 328 328
Broatlway Avenue Rehab 02: Fancher !o 0•34 ai o 547 60e Ciry e2 e2
$ Thierman STP(u) 525 526
r-'hnd nnd Irdey wfth 2lnche9 M aaphnil colxrele paYemenl
Fund,n:7 Serun?t1 (SRTG 0[ 71
Project ToW 606 sOB
i'm)oUa and Umetrpmna nfens16ed w Zu 71u ere to ;.o caneWereo eshr-sate4 cNy mnt may r.hang-e diie te e vafw'y rit C1frlIR:!L9nC!'r. Rit.
an rot htbr+ded W Mt CIIY w Ce tdfsd u0w dl' DroVerh' owr+eia w develop«s In maklnp dawbDment decisiona
Gi 1 712QOR Page 3
",r Final Draft 2009 - 21
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
%1ky oowM. M Tuo+,..ndi Fundlng
Prvfect f Descrlptlon / Curtent Status Length PE RW CN Tota) soumes 2008 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
12 PArk Road 2(PE Only)- Brondway to tndiana 75 0r2 ° 352 ~ity 46 411
5TP(U) 304 304
S
PTOJ. K_ • Recnnatruct ancl w+oen 1!7 .1 IAnP9 W11h hlMc It111C5 iStl(1 r.ldrvvr.ifkti.
f urdrng 5ecured (SRTC 06-11) -
Ptoloct Tota1 162 332
13 SuElFven/Sprngue Interseation PCC 0.1 es o rra eel cny »a Ils
gTp(ul 745 716
3
Repluca rufird aaphall pcrvPitwnt wlth porttnnd conaete com¢nt
FimAlnq Seared (SRTC 08A
PtpIoct ToW 861 881
14 IlRansfield Extension - SR27 to M{raboau 0.51 181 e75 I.4ae 2.4e4 Ctry 207 zao 497
P PafkWey UAP 820 1.158 1.967
Conctrucf :34ene artertal hrxn Pfres !o MkaAcau Parkvwy
Praac! Tofal 1,056 1,48 2.494
15 Flora Road - Sprague to Mission 1 297 300 2.673 3271 Cny ag 298 258 665
UAP m 1.180 1.069 2.816
P
Rocorstrud fo s ftes-lenc erteriai.
Pro)octTotnl a47 1,487 1,337 3.2T1
Ffopcn qnd Ilmdrarruns dwlUrod In !ho T1P ue Eo ie cnnsiAnretl esturastn nnly Ihat may cnenpe due to n usnery cl circurfieMncnR nn-
ara nol MMrW~d by Ow CNy b Wm"d uPa► bY IeoPwN rnw+sts or detialoDwn n me" Qevrla4m+M dKAUOnn
fi/17/2008 Pagp A
Final Draft 2009 - 2014
~~m, Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~ 1~I+~v DLiIIIIR If1 TTIMJEatld6
✓ Funding
ProJect I DoscrlpUan ! Current Stacus Length PE RW CN Total Souresa 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
16 Sprague Ave. Resurfacing Pro}ect 1- University 2.e2 231 a 2.625 2.956 Ciry 2.e56 2.8ss
u to Evergreen
PCS:If(@LC Sprnque nvr from JnrrersiN Rd to Eve-grecn Rd.
ProjKt Tofsl 2,856 2,Ob6
17 EvergreenlSprague Intersection PCC a 110 n 1.023 1,133 cay 233 233
S sTa soo soo
aer,ar.p asphan pavemeN wim portMne cemen+ wncretc pevemx".
Fun0lnp sequed - STA 0,356 Seles tan k'W aPDov - -
Projott Totsl 1,133 1.131
1B IndlanalSuliivan Intersection PCC o 126 o 1.216 1.342 crty 275 275
S STA 1,067 1,067
Reqlnce aspRalt paw!ment v.ttti portlnrxf cement concrete pavertent
Fundirig seaxed - STA 0.3% saies tau bvy appmvod
Projoct ToRsl 1,342 1,742
19 Park Road - Bridging the Velteyl BNSF Grade 0-2 em 2.000 13,e20 16,51e cty 31 eo 28e 285 sYa
F- Scparation FYStB 727 851 2.061 2.061 5,00o
Otfwr 364 1,045 3.308 3.308 8,026
Fod
Recorstrucf Parv Raad In seporate thr nrw}„s af F'arr. Rnail arF7 !he RNSF ralroad tnc_k. Otfw- 37 104 330 330 601
RR
UCP 91 200 824 824 t,l89
"t7iner' Fiuiding hnm RNSF RH
PropaciToLl T60 2.160 5,409 6,E09 /8,51E
t'moeh mtl fanetrema Idendlfed m 1he TIP eie to De conandwvd indrtwites oMy 1hd msp ehaepe due ba verinfy d circumWneee. ero
umnot inbndsd ~r M CIy b be rofied u0on bY DmP"ownem or developera 'si rtnkYq Wwebpme+R dacisions
6r t 7l20QE1 Page 5
„w~ ~ Final Draft 2009 - 2
SP,O~m Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~%Iw ooU,u. In tnnuaenac Fundtng
ProJect 1 DescNpUon ! Cument Statua LengM P£ RW CN Total Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Totsl
20 Sprague Ave. Resurtscing Project 2- 1 231 ? C, z` '.P'C C Ity 7'85C 2,856
p Evergreen Rd tc Sulliven Rd
Resurface Sprnpue nve from Evertjreen I2d lu SL;II,.;un Rd
ProJett Totsl Z866 =-656
zi Sulliven Road (PE only)- Euclid to Welles{ey 1 595 0 0 5e5 cny no B0
S gTp(lq 515 616
Recartslruct to s sevcn-lane urbon artenn)
Flndinp SeauM ISR7C 08-121 - - - - -
Pmyott Tofsl 696 595
n 3ulllvan Roed North Extension (&gelow Gulch) 0.25 o t 54 55 cny 65 se
p
RecoroWct and wlden Ihe Sudhran Road extenaion north aleo known ns Bigelow Gulcfi Road !o e 4lnnc roedwmy wtih
El-}oot etwtAder3 nixl n 12-tocri hvo vmy kfl tum Inru!.
ProJect Totsl 66 65
23 McDpnakJf$Mgue ffftf8eCt}pn P(;C 0 102 D 987 1.069 Cly 219 218
S STA A-`O dso
Rrnlooe mphpR pwvertwrt wNh pnrttancl cemet+a mrw'.rrM peugm^m
Fundlrxg necured - ST/t 0 3% sa*s tdx Iery ppplOVed
Prowct Totnl 1,069 1.069
Pro~fa wx1 tlmeframn idonttlled In Ihe TIP ere to Ds cane4ered eslsnales aity tne4 m+ry :l:anpa dw ta a vetrry c< cire::ms:ances, onu
m no! Mhndad bY qo CoY b Oo mahd upon E't Pm4+rb ownws w deyekWm in nrkx+0 deva"pmnl qwAiaro.
611712008 Pnge 6
Final Draft 2009 • 2014
nr
VU~ Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~ L1qy Gollen +n Tranar+ds Fufldilig
Pro}oct I Descriptlon ! CurreM 3tatus Lertigth Pf RW CN Total Souises 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Totai
24 BroadwaylSullivan Interseciion PCC ~ izn o 1 110 1,230 Ciry 253 263
STA 977 977
S
Replace gsptwh pevemcnt wlth portiFind cemont cancrole Favemont.
Fiatding betured - STA 0.396 &ales fax levy apprwed
Projoet Tatel 1,230 1,230
25 Argonne Road - 190 to Trent 0,3e 7e 500 713 1289 city n 101 17e
s cwQ aee eiz
Rrv+se Skinaf Ph881np, Add N8 itight Tum Lano at Montgomery, IntersacGans Impmvements at Knox
FuMmq S~clued (SRTC 0&331)
ProJoctTotal 676 713 1,288
2 7 Sullivan Road West Bridge 0,08 1,370 100 8,112 9 5B2 BR 735 735 4.056 4,068 9,602
p
?i.conslrur.l nrM widen waat bridcae
ProJoct Tof:l 736 735 4,054 4,056 9,682
?K Broadway Ave - Flora to Baricer 1 314 250 2.828 3.390 Cky 63 50 585 678
P UCP 251 200 2.261 2.712
Recunstruc.i ",0 3-tarie,3, flma to Rarker
ProJect ToW 114 260 2.825 3.390
Prtyetis and tRnatremeeb WonU'in1 in 1ho T1F' efre to be t,csr,f+0etad e5L7notee o+sy Cw[ msy clenpe d•x'.n r voreh ~f rircume'anree, a^.
sro not nEn+drd by 111e CMy b pe miMU upon by propatp ownwa a OsMiopen m mWttinp enmloprtoM tlacfmns
W I ; rzcon Pl4(' 7
~ Final Draft 2009 - 2
~~IP Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
4;00%1ky cldl.n +n rnousaa,ai Funding
Projoct 1 DQSCrlption 1 Cumonf Status Len9th PE RW CN Tota! Sources 2009 2010 ZOtt 2012 20t3 2074 Totai
29 APPleway-Thierman EB Lane o.oC ,r, 10 159 113; cny 3 22 25
p cMnQ z3 139 1e2
ndd ED right tum lena to Applrway a Thiarman_
ProJoct Totsl - - -26 181 187
30 M1S51o11 AVe - Flora to Barker 0•96 345 300 3,103 3,747 Cltp 89 340 310 748
UAP :1e6 1.7E11 1.241 2.998
P
Nmw 3-lQne aectmn Flprn to Barkef
ProJoCt Total 495 1.701 11551 3,747
31 Dishman Mice Rehab • 16th to Schafer 8 2.1 230 o 1,270 1.500 cny 202 202
a 8owdish lo City Umits s-rpfP) 1298 1'299
C;tintlfinlay exlsiiryg roedv►ay
ProJoct Total 1.600 1.500
32 SaltoseJSupivan Signs! 38 15 354 414 ciry 104 104
P Othor 42 +2
Other 288 Ztd
hncRwemeMs tn Intersectlon
in Coordinnuon vd Spoknne Camy
Projoci YoW 414 414
Frojecb and tmelremes Wert11t1qt in tl+e TiP ero to br consWand astmatos oray mat rnwy chMnqe due ro n varVety nf cmumetancaa, en.
.ra not Wwud Dp Il+e C11y 1o bs eepsd u0a+ bY pmpww ownwra a dsralopers In n+xhlnp davhlol+n+snt elecskx+s.
611 7r2ooa pow 8
Final Draft 2009 - 2014
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
DWsrs In Thnusenim
Funding
Project 1 Descriptlon l Cument Status Length PE RVY CN Total Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
34 PinQS Corridor (TS: Sprague to Trent <-n 222 250 1,600 2,081 City 280 280
CYAO t,eot
Traffic Signel fonlrol Syclam tnr CorriAor
Ftundlnp Sncured (SRTC 00-213) Projoct Total 2,081 2,081
35 garker Road - Appleway to Brosdway Avenue 0.28 274 1.600 t.aaa 3.165 city 158 289 taa ssa
unP 622 1. 15e 754 2,532
F
Reconstruct l0 6 rnm--lane arteriol vrilh xn!er tirn Iane hnm Applevny ro E3mArfway nvr:.: reabgn Firoadwny enst oi
BArket
Projoci Total - 77111 1,415 942 3.18b
36 Park Road -02 (CN Only)- Broadway to Indiana 0.75 0 2.000 2.326 4.326 city 270 314 ~ss
STPIUI 1.730 2,012 3.742
F
F'rol 02 - Reconstnui and wkien to 31»nes wlh O.kr tancs anh sidevnfks.
Project Tats! 2.000 2.326 4,125
37 32nd Avenue - Evargreen to Besl 025 78 250 703 1.031 Ciry 21 24 95 140
STP(U) 132 151 fl48 R81
P
Rer,onetruci ond wlden to lhree lenes wiifi niitn nru1 ald&nrnlkn.
ProJec! Tohm 133 176 703 1,091
"ropctE oM tlmehamea Men~ In tn TIP am tu oe caruAered octrnmtea enly Nut mey changeth,n tc e rwm•y nf c:r-i,mctnnr_-n ar,
ere no! Yfbnded by the CHy to De rsYed upOn bY OmpwM ownm or dAVeloOen in rtqkng dondopment deeisrons
6r17.2D(?R Paqe fi
~ Final Draft 2009 - 2
~r~~ Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
,;wO%1~ ~ Ddlan m i!vxnandv
J Fundbng
Project I Desctlption 1 Current StatLo Lenplh PE RW CN ToW $oumvd 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Tota!
38 EvergreeN32nd -16th to 32nd, Evergreen to 1.25 aoc~ 120 3.681 4.20; aty I 0A T» e63
P SR-27 srr(u) 41e 2,926 s,s"
Rer.onc!nict nnA widen to three Innes
Pro)sct Tobl 628 31881 4,207
39 Berker Road - 8th t0 App10YVay/ 0.75 272 SOD 2,449 3.220 Clfy 74 90 490 6N
P UCP 229 240 1.468 1.832
Othar 74 80 490 614
Rer,onsbuct to n IhreP-JarY urban ,utarial from flth to llpplew:ty
Projact Tobil 171 400 2,4I9 3.22Q
40 8ullivan Road (RW/CN only) - Euclki lo Wellealey 1 o 1.000 2,S25 3,525 cHY 160 w ros
p sTP(U) FAo 2,19o 2.e20
iIeconstnict to o seven-fane uman ohrria!.
ProJocf Total !00 2,729 1,625
42 Pines Corridor (TS: Sprague tn 16th 1 95 o s9o 795 cqy toe 106
p CMAO 679 679
Traffle Sign81 Canlrot Syelem tcN Go►ridnr
ProJott TOtAI - - 7ab TDb
Pmpcts anrl nmelremes dmfifia4 n ths TiP ne to be wreaxered nlemalee a0y Ihnt mnY uunpa due 10 M wrtelY rO circu."tancea, en
are not MWOed bp ftClly b De rsYod upo^ bp Groparfy ownea or devebpan 4+ mtkr+p derdopmaM dwiLh+a.
a17120ae P.Qe 10
Final Draft 2009 - 2014
0000* ~~Iv Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~ wley [kAlan in Tno,namfs
Funding
Project! Deacrfption I Currarri Status Longth PE R1N CN Tota! Sources 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total
43 Sullivan Road Rehab - Ind'+ana to Euclid 10: if;`, 0 Q;+` l, ir,i) city 22 12E tas
STP(P) 143 009 95:
F'
Gnnd.nnlay rrsd;nra roadvmy
Pro}QCt Total 166 936 1,100
45 32nd Avc Rehab • Oishman Mica to SR-27 I'm 212 0 1,1ee 1.410 city 2e 162 tst
STT'(P) 163 1.038 1,219
P
GririrlAnlay exsttnn rnarfw~y
1
Project Total 212 1.198 1.410
46 Carnahan Truck Lane - 8th to City Limits 0.5 234 o 0 234 Cuy 32 32
p sTrIu1 202 202
ned se inx:k tane tn fond
Project ToGal - - 234 234
47 Appleway Extension - Evergreon to Tshirley 2-27 e34 o o LU city >>a 113
v sTP 721 721
Otlwr
Stide
Gctend Applcw'ay Blvd wlth a mulft-Jane fncility mcttidlrx7 mbs anv1 WewniMS UCP
Prolat ToWI 834 834
nroptte arW 11me1rartxs OnnLifed in tho TIP ste So Do conaicfe?r.1 eslltrafess only mat may chnnpe Oue to a wne"I r% r.ir-wrmsinnrrs Arv
art ro1 Inbndsd by Ihe Cily b tfe rni~d upoe bY WMPWV ownrrs a drvdopen n mskinp OeytlbpmeM dqkkuis.
6i t 72008 pOW 11
Final Draft 2009 - 2
SP092M Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~%1.ky DoM'n in mousamls Funding
Project / DescrlpUon / Cumsnt 3tshn Length PE RW CN Total `~~mes 2009 2010 2011 2012 2411 2014 Total
ae University Road Inlay 2: 15th to Ath 0.69 .5 a. o acz us city so eo
P STPIpl 381 321
Grind erxf Ravo wlth 2 Inches of aspMatl conuete pavement-
Projoet ToW "1 441
49 Unfveraity Road Inley 1: Didhman-Mice Rd to 129 go a o se cny =o 20
P'I rJU1 AV@ STP(P) 79 79
Grtncf erxl pave wlth 2 Inchoc oI a,phoM conuele pewmonl.
Project Total - - 99 99
52 Park Road -93 • saresue to sroadway 0.5 „z o o city 12 12
~u, 122 ,z2
P ahpr i 7
P.ocacistrur,f end vAden to o atanderd threo-Jnne artorlat s[reet wlth curbc ontt srtdevrarcs. FCC on Drosdwoy. UCP
ProJatl Total 1 41 141
53 Barker Road - Spokene River to Trent 1•4 303 0 0 303 cIry 41 41
p s'TPIu) zsz 262
Ret-.cx,acruet ro■ mrse-lare a~ arladal
M Coordlnedon vd BN
prplpCt Total 103 303
ProjaCts uld timefremea itfentlfVeA In Me T1P srt lo PO contdwrsd Ntimslss wdy thnl may U:enpe d:m b e vannly M cvrimnanr.ee. mr
an rol MeM00 br fu Eqy b Ae eubsd upon C1t Dg"whl' owrota of owrloQan In mmkh+q dre*iopRvm doemmm
611 Mooe rage 12
Final Draft 2009 - 2014
P~10l~t Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~ ky Dalisn In TTwousends
FUf1dil1g
Pro)oct / DQSCriptlon ! Current Status Length PE RW CN Totsl goUrCe9 2008 2010 2011 2012 2015 2011 Totsl
54 Euclid Ave! Flora Rd - Florn Euclid to Euclid, I>> 379 o o 379 city 51 61
p Euctid Flore to Barker s-r'iu) 328 323
+?E!C0n5?fIPCl !L p(OVIde n inrec lane. shciiiderrri aitenul
Projoct Total 379 379
Totals: 10,690 13.474 96,369 120,531 19.673 18,E93 22.838 23.618 24.348 12,832 119,900
Rrt+pcfs snd tunetrumes ulnnufied m the TIP am to Ce mnsi:ferM estimatne only the! may thanpe due *o a Varaty '+f tirctr!^.stAnr-e nr~
ars ool I11etrk0 bp mC+ly b be oll~d uPDnoY DeoOGM awnsis a derdopert n mskinp devdopmeM dscicionr
Fy:t 72008 Page 13
,r,,.~~~ Final Draft 2009 - 4
Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program
~Val]ey
Six-Year Transtwrtation Improvement Pro~ram Total_s
Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals
Year Feftnl Stoto OtMr Clly Tobl Fsdenl 8ble Otlw Cky Tobl F*dQrsl Sfab OtMr City Total
2009 S8.278 $1.522 $3.260 $4.402 $15.480 $409 fN $403 f3.277 i,~093 ~,686 t1.626 53.863 57.87o i19.5T.i
3010 S1.014 $1,3E6 $1.027 f3,6E3 i7.e'70 i2.162 :1.759 =1,647 f3.465 f9.023 $3.176 $3,125 53.474 $7.119 $16.893
2011 52.413 f0 SO i3.073 $5.488 f5.643 $51,134 $414 i1.799 ;17,162 $8.258 f9.138 $411 i4.832 i22.638
2012 $0 50 $0 52.342 i2.392 t9,M4 i8,956 $404 :2.221 521.224 $0.644 $8,965 $404 $4.013 $23.818
2013 $0 50 SO $2.301 $2.391 914.098 i5.120 $410 $2.329 $21.45T $14,008 S5.120 :410 f+.720 S24.348
2011 $0 $0 SO Q2.301 $2.391 $6.728 =1.400 S497 :1.747 $10,441 =8.729 $1,160 y497 54.138 $12.832
Total $9,705 SZ.BIIB 56,107 S18,312 SSS,010 S3B,884 f28,4t3 S3,T76 $14.788 fe3,t00 f0,687 $28,331 58,862 f33,100 $119.900
Prajecb and Innelrtnr~ MerdNlsd In ae T1P r+ to De oomldWed Nllnwlse only L'Kt mayr ctnnps dus 1n e wmb d chcumstameN. srn
an rot intended bqr eu CnY M he ndMd upm M Pqe*h oWrws or developm in watkp AwwAoprnent deciNor+a.
91 t MDUB Payr. 1
City of Spokane Valley
Departrnent of Public Works
Six Year Transportatlon {mprovement Rrogram
Projede wl no iden6Aed Lacal Match wilhin the 2009 Sluc•Year TIP
Dcllan In Thousands
h~ot ~ Mrrt1~A ilrt YW Trtil 0d
Bin Avenue Pheae 1- Camatun W Reconswd bth Ave. b e Uveoaane 2015 $2.515
Havena sedian wflh arb. pulter, sICewdks
and belae lanee
81h Arrsxk Phase 2- Park to Didcey RsconnUud 81h Ave. to a Ihree-tane 2016 S3.168
sactkon wtth arb. "sr, sidewslks
and Wke lenes.
8th Avenua Phsse 3- Dlckay to Reconetruct ft Ava. Io a three-tene 2015 i3,811
Camahan aedlon wlth wrh, yuRter, sidewalka
and boce ianea.
Barker Road Raconstrudlon. 32nd to Spokane County Project, 2015 $<U
Qth RaoortiSruct Barkar to 34-ane
Secdon, Gityr Psrlrtier rtteith
Bawd+sh Road • 32nd to Bth Recorrsttud and widen roadvrey to 2016 $4,593
three lartea-
BaNdish Road Rehah - Olshrr.an 2" Cidnd and Irday exlating roed 2016 S270
Mlca W 32nd
SR27/Plnesrl6th trttersetUon Improvemenfs tfl kKeraecUon (Duel 2018 $3.132
lene RoundaboutT)
UrdversttyrSpregue Imersecu.an PCC Replace esphalc pevement wtUi 2016 5997
portland cemer►t concretn pevement.
Tatals: i18,614
Preseeta and Vmehamos IOa+Utted m the TIP ao "r ba caniidsrod as5rr4tLa only that r.iay d,anpe due Wa wriety of u:tumouncea, and arr rzt
IneendeE Cy ths CMy to be rded upon by propmty ewmra or devaiopan n rt»klnp dsvNayn+snt dsdslona
Monday, Juna 0:, 2(Xe Page 1 oi 1
City of Spokane Valley
Department af Public Works
Six Year Transportabon Improvement Program
!IM • l111
poun h ThouaanCs
2089
NN1!i mm~ ftftn3" a1 AnO TNr 1■ng
0 Brosdway Avenue Safery Profett - Pines(SR•27) UAP 187 933
to Pa1c
1 Rines/Msnsfield TPP 208 1.795
2 BsAc6t Roed Bridge BR 204 4.158
3 ApQ{eway/SpraQue/D+shimat►-Mica f'TS - 190 to CMAO 50 375
Dislnrran Mlcs
4 STEP Pavebadc City 1.291 1.500
5 Street Rresenretiw Projed - Variars Stree! Ciry 1,224 1,293
6 Broadway Ava 180 R E. W Moore to Ftort UAP 12 80
7 Applewey - UrtWrsity to Evergroen STP 121 937
8 WSOOT Urban Rimp ProJetts - 8roattway, CRy 300 300
Argonttie, Fnlya I1C
9 PineeJSpfapue Intensecdon PCC STA 162 742
10 44th Ave PaRhway: Sands to Woodrutl STP(E) 44 328
11 Broadwny Avenue Rehab 02: Fancher to STP(U) 82 608
Thmrnen
12 Park Road - N 2(PE Only} Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 48 352
13 SulllveNSpnpue Intersedon PCC STP(U) 116 861
16 `-f ragI1C AYg fZ85lif1E:1'1g Pf:~arl 1- U~i14dfb<<',r cinl 2,~, w-
t _ E'rZt¢'Ct"t
17 EvergmeNSprapue InUraectlon PCC STA 233 1,133
18 Indiene/Sulllvan httsrssWon PCC STA 275 1,3A2
1008 Tatsls: $7,401 _ $19,573
aruJeed ind Omwfiwma idartifwd in tna T1P m 1o Oe cansidae0 asturatas orNy eASt may chsnpe due ba hnsty d dr.un-Aftrro~s, arrd am not
mfart6ed by the CRy lo be nlird UVom bY DroferTY ownM a de'rioper! In makln9 deveopmeni dedsbM
AdOk ptaotcs an thoun+ m Qreor h•,,.y • - . : ,e- , _ funded ProjsCs ue ohwm fn 6We
Tuesday, June 03. 2008 Paqe 1 oi 4
tau aty A...c tssg AmM
4 STEP Paveback Ciry 1,204 1,348
5 Street Preservation Projecx - Vertous Stree! Cny 1,224 1,293
6 Brosdway Ave 180 R E af Moore to Flore UAP 342 1.708
7 Applewey - UniversR}I to Evergraen Other 208 2.859
ie Mansrield Extr3+sion - SR2 ' tc MiraOeau Fartrwa; UAP 207 15 Flore Road - Spregue to Miasion UAP 89
19 Psrk Raed - Bn4g•ng tne Velley! BNSF Grade Other Fed 31 75'
$ @rard'.Evn
20 "pue Ave Rsauriadnq Project 2- E+ergreen City 2,856 2,8 _
Rd to 5ulfwan Rd
21 Sulltven Road (PE only)- Eudid W VYeileslsy STP(U) 80 595
23 McOonalQ/Sprague IMersedion PCC STA 219 1,069
24 8roadwsylSulfivan Intereedian PCC STA 253 1.2"
25 Arponne Rcad -190 to Trcnt CMAQ 77 57
27 Suillvan Road Weet BrfdQe BR 0 7:3=
28 6foadwz! y k•:e - F~:r,a t:, E erke, UCP 63 314
29 At ~;evy2y Tt,;erman EB Lent CMAp 3 26
2010 Tobis: $6,864 $16,893
2011
Ro # IM0 II= him Y l~ OtY Amo■it Tehl Art
4 STEP PaveDack City 1.204
5 Sveet Proservetlon Projed- Various Sbaet City 1,224
7 Appleway - Universlty to Everyreen UCP 448 7,7 =
14 I.ila'tS`t±ld EY:anSiG^. - SR?- lG Mitc3Ce:'.i Pdtr UAP YgO 1,446
15 Flora Road - Spraflua to Misaion UAP 298 1,487
19 Perk - 8nu34,ig ttie Val+e:! BNSF G'sde Other Fed 90 2,150
SsRe'ation
25 Argonr►e Road -190 to Trent CMAO 101 713
27 Sul{ivan Road West &Idge 8R 0 736
28 6ro27.tia~ Ave - F{3r,& t•- 6arl-er UCP 50 250
29 Appleway-Thke-man EB Lsre CMAo 22 181
30 hAiSc_ir_q A':h - Fl4ra tfl Be*o1 UAP 89 465
31 Oishmen Mip Reheb - 18th to Scheter ~ STP(P) 202 1,500
Bcwdish Ia City Limits
32 SaftesBrSuilivan Signal Other 104 414
34 Pmes Cortidor RS 5prspve to Trem CMAO 280 2,081
35 BUrke• Road -Arp'eway tc• Elro~i~A3~ Av-unue UAP 156 778
2011 Tobb: t4,66a 322,838
Projectsend 6mshtmas Id~ntitled irt the TIP xm 1o Ce oonaidind eswnases onty Uvt rtuy chence "bo vuoeb d daumsemoes. and an noS
tr,tarseed by the Gft te tre rdwd upon by propxty owners a dweloyen In moMnp davolopment deddons
h04ed vrw:+s an snown u, GrMn P rc e] F:-•jr, r:;, a-ie Fundea Projeda we s1+awn In Blw
Tuesday. June 03, 2008 Paqe 2 of 4
2012
no!t R*et mm h'r7wu Oty Awo idhllrt
5 Street Preservatian Nroject - Vanous 5treet Cdy 2,261 2,392
15 Flaa Road - Sprapue to Misston UAP 288 1,337
18 Pav* R1aa • 6redc;ing the Valley; 6N5► GracSe Oftr Fed 288 8,809
S@pdraUO~
27 Supiven Road West Bddge BR 0 4,068
28 Broa2way tive - Flora tc 6a-kF° UCP 565 2,828
30 Mission Avs - fbre [o Barkv UAP 340 1.701
35 6aike+ Road • Ppalcw.ay to Broa:sway A•J$rue UAP 289 1,4+t5
38 Park Road - 02 (CN Only)- Broodway to Indiarw STP(U) 270 2.000
37 32nd Avenue - Everoreen to Besi STP(U) 21 153
38 Everyreenl32nd -18th to 32nd, EwrQmn to SR- STP(U) 1 o8 526
27
39 BzrkQt Reall UCP 74 3'1
2012 ToUls: 64,/82 $23,616
20
Ioii hiM 0" ANN TIW A■M
5 Street PreservBBon ProJed- Va1ous &treet City 2,260 2.391
19 Farv F.t.ad • 9riOging the Valtgyr HNSF Gtade Other Fed 286 8,80E
Sepanab on
22 Suilivsn Road North Extenalon (Bipelow C3ulch) Ciry 55 55
27 Sullivsn Road West Bridge BR 0 4,056
30 MISS~on Ave - FMara tr, 6arker UAP 310 1.651
35 6arker Rc,ad - Apalew-ay to Bro-3dway Avenue UAP 188 8+►2
36 P8r1t Road • 02 (CN Onty} BrGedwey to Indlarie STP(U) 314 2,325
37 32nd Avenue - Evwpreen to Best STP(U) 24 17$
;se EverpreeN32nd .16th to 32nd. Everareen to SR- STP(U) 755 3.681
27
39 Berker R:si - Bth t: Appleway UCP 80 400
40 SuIIMan Road (RW1CN only) - Eudid to Wellesley STP(U) 190 800
42 Pfnes Cortidor tTS' Sprsgue to 16th CMAO 108 785
43 Sullrvut Road Rdtsa • Indiene ta Euciid STP(P) 22 165
45 33nd Ave Rahsb - Qkshmin MIce to SR-27 STP(P) 29 212
- - - 2013 ToWs: t4,6a9 :21,348
P:a,bcta and Umaframm identfiad !n the TtP in ta be conisiderM echrsatea ony Ityt rtsay chenQe due in a venaty af UroumiLnCea. ar.d aTS not
m:erwed br tns CAy b Es estlW uya+ W prowb owrrrs a dwolapan h moklnp dtvrlopmr++f dedhian.
A:1owd Fmrcta at* thoar a- G.wn ~ e:...:~ :i ~c : . _ r • ,,e Funded i'reoM w shairn In Slw
Tuesday !une 03, 2008 Pafle 3 0! 4
2iu
ItIN!t h*ot ~ I~r ~S Oh 1MM Tdd AMM
5 Street PraservaUon Praect - Vsrious Street City 2.260 2,391
37 32nd Avenue - Evergroen to Best 5TP(U) 95 703
39 Ha*et Rr-aj • e±r. t_ Ar,vle.vay UCP 490 2.449
40 Sutlivan Road (RW/CN only) - Euclid to Weilesley STP(U) 545 2,725
43 Sullivan Road Rehab - InCiana to Eudid STP(P) 126 935
45 32rod Ava Rehah • Dishman Mica to SR•27 STP(P) 152 1,198
48 Cemahan Tnudc Lane - Bth to City Umita STP(U) 32 234
47 Applmay Extension - Evergreen to Tahirky STP 113 834
48 University Road Inlay 2: 15th to 4th STP(P) 80 441
49 Universiry Raad Infay 1: Dtshman-Mca Rd to STP(P) 20 89
15th Ave
62 Park Road - 03 - Sprague to &oadway STP(U) 12 141
63 Barkei Road - Spokene Rlver to Treni STP(U) 41 303
54 Euclld Ave1 Flora Rd - Flara Eudid to Eudld, STP(U) 51 379
Euclid Flore to Barker
- - 2011 Totals: 54,007 512_02
P-vJocts ud 11mKromes identAlod In ttlt TIP an to W CasWareC esbmatss only tnat may chanqe dw bm aefety d drwm4vncas and an not
nlended Oy ?+e Glty b be raIIeQ upa+ by prop" oMefers a dweiapan in rt+aidnp Cawioprrrrrt dedaiorta
uaaed Prol.cv u• usar+ nG'Nn ^•a: t,R~.. cf ~r.;..r-•s >n- .n i A,- fundedProJeOaaroalwdrnit8kn
Tuesdey. .lune 03, 2008 Page 4 of 4
~
~ i
~ r No
, g
• o O
~ ~ ° ~
~ ~ - , •I {
; ' : •4 '~~a~ 3"'' ~
~ f_•~--•.
` r {
f ~ ~ '4• .~-F~ - l~U. ~f1
- ~ ~
y' I ~ ~
~
i 1 °3r a~
...n~ L f ~ ~ ♦
y lu` •~9 t"~ ^ j _ ~ ~
R ud~
~ - . ,
~ ►
o
d ;
I • 1~-
f~ j
~ t
t ~
ta A ~
A 4l N ~
!
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent Z old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Pines-Mansfield Corridor Congestion Relief Project - Bid Award
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: 1) Approval of Six Year Transportation Improvement
Plan, which includes the Pines/Mansfield project, 2) approval of application for federal grant
funding for the Pines/Mansfield Project, 3) approval of Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement
with the TIB for the PineslMansfield project; 4) approval of a quit-claim on one parcel to
complete right-of-way acquisition; 5) informational memo in June 3, 2008 Council Packets.
BACKGROUND: The Pines-Mansfield Corridor Congestion Relief Project was advertised for
bids on Friday, May 23. The scheduled bid opening date was rescheduled from Friday, June 13
' to Thursday, June 19. After opening bids and tabulating the results, staff will present results at
the Tuesday, June 24 Council meeting to award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder.
OPTIONS: 1) Award the Pines-Mansfield Corridor Congestion Relief Project bid to the lowest
responsible bidder or 2) provide additional direction to staff.
RECOIVIMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: iVlove to award the Pines-Mansfield Corridor
Congestion Relief Project bid to the lowest responsible bidder.
BUDGETIFINANCIAL IMPACTS: Based on current project estimates and expenditures there
are sufficient funds in the Street Capital Project Fund (Fund 303) to cover the estimated project
costs. This project is funded by several sources:
• Federal Congestion Mitigation / Air Quality grant of $1.6 million
• State Transportation Improvement Board grant of $2.2 million (with anticipated
additional funding of $329,034 after bid award, if needed)
• LoGal developer funding of $544,000
• Spokane Transit Authority grant of $537,000
• City funds estimated at $344,000
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Woriey, Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Neil Kersten, Public Worlcs Director
ATTACHMENTS Bid tabulations will be provided after the bid opening.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
~ Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business 0 new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Authorization to Submit Legislative Report to
State Auditors
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
Council held a public heari.ng Junc 10, 2008, on the final performance audit Qf public record requests.
BACKGROUND:
1n accordance with stated procedure dlat legislative bodies submit a report by July 1 detailing the status
of the legislative implementation of the State auditor's re.commendatians in connection witli T'indings
outlincd in the aforementioned 1'erforniance Audit Repnrt; and althaugh none of ihe Findings were
dieected to the City of Spokane Valley, sLiff offers the attached report.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the Mayor to execute the
Attached Legislative Report , and have staff forward it to the State Auditor's Office as required
by voter approved Initiative 900.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS: Legislative Report to State Auditor's Office, on the Performance Audit Report
DRAFT
~ S009ane
,;oOValley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.92 1. 1000 ♦ Fax: 599.921.1008 ♦ cityhallpspokanevalley.org
Cl'1'Y OF SPOK.ANE VALLEY
LEGISLATiVE REPOIt'T' `I"O STATF AUDITOR'S ON"FICE
PERFORMAVCE AUDiT FtFPORT: UYEN PUBLIC RFCQRUS P12AC'11CE5
T.n accoedance wiYh statcd pracedure thaY legislacive bodies submit a report by July 1 detailing the status of
the IegislaCive implementtition of the State auditor's reeommendations in connection with Findings
outlined in the afnrementioned Performwce tludit Report, and although none of the T'indings Nvere
directed te the City of Spokane Valley, we offer the followinb:
FINDING #1. Thirty-one nf 300 unannounced public records requests (10 percent) were considered
nonresponsive. An addilional seven responses (2 perecnt) were either nonconformin~ or incomplete.
AUI)ITOR'S RECONL1ffiNnATIQN: 1Ve recommend that entities follow the Attorney General's
model rules and the best practices identifiecl i.n this report to the fullest eYtent possible, particularly in
regard to the following:
• Establish and follow processes to ensure that all requests arc received.
r ~ • Evaluate proces5es and controls aroumcl incomitig mail to ensure records requests are found and properly
routed.
• ltefrain from redirecting requestors to another departrnent within the same entity or requiring requescors
to iniliate a"neNv" reque5t wit}iin the same entity.
• Avoid the use of e-mail filters th<<t result in the entity rejecting or overlooking public records requests.
See related Findirig No. 2.
• Review responses anci comrnunicate with requestors to ensure the records to be provided are consistent
with the request.
Ay aLSnokg~lev'~8cs.potse: The St:aI:e Auditor's Office failed to receive responses to 31 (10
g
percent) of their 300 public recnrds requests. The City of Spokane Vdlley was not among that 10%, as we
strive to follow our establisheci processes implemented via Spnkar►e Valley,Muniaipal Code 2.75, recently
ennctett by Spokane Valley City Ordinance 07-006 efrective 4-25-07, which ordinance was fashionecf
after the Attorney General's Nlodel 12ules, and which is evidence that the City has implcmcnted best
practices that have resulted in high performance in this area..
.r.{'I_N,1)ING #2: Some entities do not accommadate a variety of public records requests and therefore
cio nat providc the public wiCh the fullest assistance.
AUDITOR'S RECOINTMCNDA'1'ION: 1Ve recommend that entities:
• Fstablish policies that are consistent tivieh the Public R.ecords Act, using the Attorney General's model
rules as a guide.
• Conduct broad staff training on the Public: Recorcls Act
• Accommodate as many modcs of requesting publie records as is practically possible.
~ • Sclect and set e-mail filtcrs at a level thal will not block public records requests.
,
• Consider receiving records requests online.
• Develop a policy that clearly outlines how public records requests can be accepted and make that policy
readily available to the public.
July 1 Report Re Fublic Records I'erformance Auclit Page 1 of 4
DRAFT
Oty of Snolkane_V.9llc~`'s Re-s~,~onsg: The City of Spokane Valley strives to follow our established
~ processes implemented via Spokane Valley Municipal Code 2.75, recently enacted by Spokane Valley
Cit), Ordinance 07-006 effective 4-25-07, which ordinance was fashioned after the Attorney General's
Model Rules, ancl cherefore, we werr not among those entities not accommodating a variety of public
records requests. We htive held several trai.ni.ng sessioiis for all staff on the Public Record.s Act, and we
accommndate as many mndes of requesting public records as are practical, including written, faxed, in-
person verbal requests, telephoned requcsts, and e-mailed recluests. The auditor's office did recommend
w•e "allow" for public record requests to be submitteci via the web; and although lhis is not a matter of
"allowing" for those requests to be submitted via the web, we currenTly do not have the capabiliCy to
accept those viti thc web, althoiigh we do accept requests via e-mail, which accommoclates many of the
requests we rcceive. '1'his is an example of how the City has implemented best practiccs that have resultecl
in high perfonnance in lhis area.
FTNDING #3 Some entities did nqt provide complete and satisfactory explanations for redactions oF
public records and some records were improperly redacted.
t1UDIT()R'S REC01171V1EN1)ATIQ\`: VJe recnmmend that entities:
• I'rovicle coiiiprehensive training and resource materials on leyal exemptions to staff who respond to
records requests.
• Describe the specific eYemption that applies to eaah redacrion when the records are providE_d to
requestors.
• In1'orm requestors about their rights to appeal the enticy's denial of all or part oPtheir records request ancl
thc process available to them to appea] the denial.
• Seek guiciance when determinin? whether reclaciions are legal.
~ C'~itv of Snoka~e Vallev's Res.tzonsq.: The auditor's office received 43 records with acceptable redactions,
11 (26"/0) of which did not cite the specific legal esempt•ion for the redactions. The Ciry of Spokane
Valley was not among that 26%, which is a result of die City having implcmented best practices that.
have resulted in high performance in this area.
FIl\'DING #4: Some entitics provided the requested public records in a less limel}' manner thvn their
peers.
AiJDTTQR'S 12ECONi1'IEr'DATION: We eecommend entities review their public records requests
processes to identify and eliminate those elements that may delay praviding records. Specifically, Nve
rec;ommend entities:
• PriOritize incoming records request5 t6 idcntify those that reyuire review and/or redaction versus more
straightforward requests that can be fulfillecl more quickly.
• Use e-mail to respond to publie records requests whenever possible.
• Fsnlore opportunit.ies for providing records electronically.
• Provide trainictg for staff on processing publie records requests.
• Provide crnss-training to otlier seaffito prepve them for ack.nowledging a.nd responding to requests.
• 1'rovitle records in installmcnts.
• Consider waiving copying charges for small records requests.
• Fngage in ongoing communication with the requestor aboul priorities and timelines when a request is
identified that may take some time co fill.
Ci oLSli.okxne Vallev's ltesounse: \'Jithin five business days of receiving a public records request~s,
state law requires cntities to providc the requested record, or acknowledge receipt of the request and
provide a reasonable estimate of the time required to fill lhe request; or deny the requesc ancl notify the
requestor of thc reason. The Audit Report's table of thc slowest requests by entity includGS 19 out of the
30 government entities. The City of Spokane Valley was not among those slowcst Aiid in fact, when
comparett with other cities, we were consistently quicker then all other cities, whicli is due in large part to
the fact that the City has implemented besl practices that have resulted in high performance in this area.
Julv 1 Reaort Re I'ublic Recorcls E'erfonnance Audie Page 2 of 4
DRAFT
~ Submitted Fuid approved by Spokane Valley City Council this 24t° day of June, 2008.
Attest:
Richard Munson, Mayor
Chrisline Bainbridgc, City Clerk
11SV-FS11l1serslcbainbridgelcbainbridgclClerkljuly l report performance gudit.doc
July 1 Report Re Fublic Records Performcince Audit Page 3 of 4
~ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY , Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
' ❑ information (E adrnin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Program for New City Hall Facility
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Bernardo 1JVills and GGLO conducted the first programming/visioning
meetings with each department and key staff on November 15, 2007. On December 11`h they
O conducted two programminglvisioning meetings with all members of the City staff. On January
12t' they conducted a two hour programming/visioning meeting with the City Council at their
winter retreat. On January 17t' and 181fi they conducted two full days of detailed meetings with
each department regarding specific needs for individual spaces, equipment, support spaces and
functional relationships within the departments and between other departments.
The draft program has been reviewed by the administration, department directors and o4her key
staff.. A copy of the proposed program was given to Council as an informational item on June 3,
2008. Bernardo lNills & GGLO will present the program to Council on June 241;h.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMEPIDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS Presentation
~ J
~Val Ley
~
~ _ _ ~ ~•}•~,w- ~
.
Spokane-..Va
:.s
- a_ ~ -
City
Council
' o• mming . g
June 4 II•
~
Executive Summary
Purpose of the Program
•"Living Document" to guide City, Design Team
and Project Stakeholders toward shared goals
• States the "problem" of the project
- Qualitative descriptions of space needs,
adjacencies and uses
- Quantitative data of space req u i rements,
current staff and expected growth
~
~ 166ps
P rocess
_
} ~ 4
• Desig n Team
commissioned in Oct 07
,
;
• Conducted meetings with -
_ _ . ~ .
Department Heads, Staff &
City Council from Dec 07 - Jan 08
• Met with City Representatives, proposed site Owners
and Spokane Library District regarding layout &
phasing of proposed City Center
• Refine document/define goals at
follow-up meetings in Feb & Mar 08
~
~
Section 1: Project Introduction
.
r i~ia
a~
1' 17
Project Summary
Proposed Site -
Former University City Shopping Center
' _ ' ' ' ' ' ~ ~ ~ - ~s....wv~ f' • , . , - - . ~ ~ ~ `
~ f . _ , • f. ~ ` J~ I ♦a ~v~, ~
~ R~ I ~ ' ♦
t ~1/SYri ~ ^,.~~rr _ - I I~ _ ~ .
I}~-~'~~ • J T~Y'~k71TNfiLA , ,~..r.._ - _
~ . .I i~ . . '
NMI ~ . ~ - - _ - i~ . _ • •
~
~rs ~ `~Lu►e
~ Y DIYlfO(~Vf1t G I = n:a r.D^~n^' _ ~ ~
I ( ~^~,1 f1 . . ~ ~ ' .
r~t / ~ . - f- r •
• . .,r,`.,,'r ~ j--~
' ^Y^
e w
12
Project Summary
• City Center to be a pedestrian-friendly City "heart"
• City Hall projected at approximately 54,305 sf,
2-3 stories
• Exterior to promote Civic Character & be
coordinated with other uses
• Primary functions:
- Public meeting space for City Council
- Office space for City Departments
- Lease space for expansion
~
m° : ~
WOO ,
. ~ - s
-
A . d ! • " i .
~ M 4
Project Mission
"We will build a City Hall
that represents & serves
a community of where
opportunity individuals & families can
and pIY & businesses
a
grow
will flourish & prosper"
te
~ '
Project Goals ,
• C ity
• Staff
, , ; _ s~!~~ .
Community
,1 ~ ' r'■ I
. ;
- • Economic
• Sustainability
,
-
~ - 0 Design Team
~
~
Sustainability ,
Project Goals
~
~w~wrvwr
a-
• LEED@ Gold °~~~•T-~ -
111
Certification from oi!.. ~N.~:
Yt~~~[' 1~ 1 f'~w;-~p`~M`t-~ V!7Rf.SJ~t+P^\ l't
~~~~OR~.•.-'1.Z~ . r'!llfi~T..7~/•^t=`c~T~ I `f• -i
the USGBC
• ~cn~-~f~ _ '
iwi :-~°~i~. . • .-T
• Balance Environmental
~
Social & Economic
Concerns
• Be an example to the Community
. ~
: ~
LEED Status
CITY HALL LEED Goai
Inland NoKhwest
• Post Falls (95% Complete) Certjfied
Western Washinsiton
• Burien (in construction) Silver
• Mukilteo (in design) Gold
• Kenmore (in design) Silver/Gold
• Olympia (in design) Silver
• Port Townsend (completed) Silver
• Puyailup (95°!o complete) Sjlver
• Redmond (completed) Silver
• Sammamish (completed) Sitver
• Seattle (compieted) Gold
• Shoreline (in design) Silver - ~
;
M-- - m 0 0
Section 3: Project Context & Background
~ ~
Context & Background
.
• Site
.I-a% ' -♦1_~. . .
IPL
1 ~ ~ w,~~r,~~• j ~ ~ ~
' ~ j ~ ~
r+ _
F
~ .y;
- - ' , ` ~ - ~ . ~ , •
~
Context & Background
• S ite
• History
;E ~~t►._ - -
, .
, r _ -~,r ~ ~ e ~
, j - _ ~ ~ • ~ ~
- - - - -
Phato: 8Poka
~
~
Context & Background_.
• Site
• History
~ ~r - • ,-t'►
.
•
Identity&
Civic Pride
~
- ' w
R
. - ~
Pitntb; www.spakanevalfeyotiqn orU
~ ' . i~
Conte-xt & Background
• Site
• History . . .t
~ ~~-'s'•~,; ~ ~ , -~'l ~
1. ~ ' • ~
• ' ; ~ ~ _
Identity r ~J►, • ~r0 i _ ~ ;
- ' 'a"~ ' . v~ ~ ~ ° • ~ ' • ~ ~
Civic Pride I 001M1+~ ~
~ , • \ ~4
Residents - .
~
t ~
Context & Background
• Site
~
- ~ ~r
i
;
• H *I St0 I'y
~
.
,
• Identity&
Civic Pride _
r,
.~~t.
• Residents
• Government
: ~
Section 4: Staff and Council Input
_ ; ~
02
Meeting Topics
Staff & Council tnput
• Image/Precedents
• ~ Demographics/
Economic Growth
• Design Process
-V• Planning
Y• Environmental
• Organization
~ • V11ork Environment
• Other
- = L - e
.
vw; ' g~
~ tv 4a'e~ / /
. F{
~
! x A
Project Data
u
Building DEpART~{M T NPROOY lt:i tlrst i 7!Y aft tOT T tAi.
!1~.•. _ [ i
COS►WCILCft/WBGR ~~YMrycM C.I': f:,f+ t 1"G
Area - s ....wa~s~awg ~ ~nr ~y e4 ~ a
wa. w~w.k.. o o ~ o
Summary
oa~cr+.~. ~uo~ ~oo ~ zeoo
Cas+d Conl~rKS Roam 1 TXaf/ (]0) :10 1 ~IO
NM A1w S1~FbIM S,E~O
aax o~e a,w
~tc a ~a~u vE ~T
an rAMAGfiR C71y Yan~r 151tifi ?25 1 713
tpr19 160 1 tE0
91d► Wetkfd0~r S'YD' 61 S J20
ruNe lasaos a~a.0. Roan t v a ~z txo ~ na
ifqeR~tCri6~Vlwi'Miinam W~c10'(~) 100 1 100
9t5
Mr ?9X ?29 t 1~4
L~u pMRMrMp 12YtS 2S6 1 716
[~paiyr Clly Man~y 17M16' 16~ 1 ~00
9d1lVYorl~~Mlr~f 3M!' 6~ 3 142
~N~a+ 1'r/ c+wuArr~ b'1~' 6~ 1 8{
ace~a. a~oom u ~ ea ~e
Atr ~36 1.A6
qIW~IC6 flrr~Clrrmr tTtt1f ~t6 1 716
OdffYYpluuMOns ~1t10 ~0 t3 1Aq
Prwno~Ca+h/oaROwn tOxt7(~1 ti00 1 t00
N~r CpMrr+a Roem 10t 1C vel Irq~ uDie tE0 t Ie0
►IM Aw~ ~ubbW 1,01a
A►r :5K 179 t M6
d u x
Project Data
raM saur. ~otl,pe ~.~'s sF
. r.......~ . ~ea..... a'.s+..• r~.r..~.r i.....
fyynronrrAr<!up~MtMien•1'-~f~r +ntJ~"rt~~e~i'~h'~'K~ Ra~1~~M/Ym
De /
artment
Space
Aidr~r~ ~niaM.re n«rr~Q. rwe r.~rraN~
Requirements
M p. ~MI a/IO~MIN ~ 1QK nw/ 1I M~af b wnP~r ~rn
u~y ~s~re..Y. N a..e rar.. e......n w e~r+.a~es w~.a
..r
Ww lrtry i r~e~~~ n. m~.und farl
w~1 b~
4wd ~Au~ ~.r }rn ns~~ n da rwv
:.un.~w fbrl R11~'d }1Q0
/~e~rn O~er~ (f~Mt GIN1 1 1Arert ~ 100
n~~r~~ era RnsrOlsr ~y if~9
p~q h...,. a M.w ~fn x r.r
C~IIr 11~W WodMm N~lf ' Y' S
Yr~ Iht► 11~ I t
p~~y r~r IC~ 17 1M ~
~
~►wawMEMM I~e~n I%f f'1 M ~
~1 r~ d tlu1M/ wIF rwr
~i~~ ~rlw IVf~ ~
v~n ~a~n Tv two~aav
~d M~n~t S~ T fR . I
N Mlow to 1rr~ le+w,l~Mrti ~af Mvn~f ~nr~ I7w~ u M.e ~ep. ~c1in
' M ~
• oje • rr a
Adjacency
E S ~~+1
~ ~ ■
~
~ V-1-.. _.1._ t r CTtt COUIKU IOfFKt a
p . ~ h~Y i7tCUTNE/CRYIJAN~G[11
17 7 ~ ♦ ~ ! PI U6/LL
~y M._y_ ~ N aH L ADYMI -0AtJT7 Cttr M671
♦ t ~ Y fiK t ~~1MIN-MJNAN HSOUKf1
..Y ~ N O►i ! AI~tM •FIN0.NCF
i i QK~AUYMI•I.T
~ r 1 t i GA.OtVFiOrMfM
r t ~ C.D-►IAMMINo
♦ CD tltll7~Ki
r r N ~ IV~UC bMO~SQdIM1
. N rvuswarsmic~n
r ► Y • ; WYNIANt
r r • ~ muwti►or~►~at~
r ~ rv~uc ~emwo~
-.-i'.._ .i - mv► M1A / Wa~sR ~oou
r sr,ur Mtar ~oaM ~ rfra~cn
n~ e~ux woow
.,,d• r - r+~cKrmenwuwurtRr
n.,. wl. an.~.~ ~ ' r nArlc rAtllnlo txnn
l~' r~ai~ M N STAFf~A1tlfINfIENTINf
Mn~~mrc~ 40~ avatant-. fXit1U011►IAtA
El(TiAWII 000/ Ult7
II M R
Project Data
couMCK
r.c.
Staffing
G'•IMLAY~I!!R
u_XINCAMBISQR ~
'.~ERfTr W1rOR
I 08)
V1,YG7
~NCtLYfY6t}!
_~1la,IlYEA1BFR
CURRFIR RT~ff
_ 100
Erf Ll.~Tilii ► I F~i~IATt'.e e~~►OhRT
Future +36 firy Y~w~7~.
, •1WM
otal 136 ~
ci tv c~~t
~LW~MBTRATIVE MOteT11Ni
ACMPI16T11Ai1V! A6StSTAf1T
CESVtr cm C~6p~c
cvaa£rtt s~~rs
oervTr ar acaec ~
~stm an' c.tcRx
Fu'ru~ s1M► ~
~ i
~
LGK, dlTlRM
LECa~iL I1fTEVN
[~'~RR''/ O tt AT T011NEY •
/h,'tNl►1iSTRATN► E➢qBTNR
CWtRfM 9T~R ~
rt vuTV d rv ntToRwfv
UEiRJiY l~Tf AiTO[MJFY .
OFPUt7 G117 ATIONfI£T ~
~sT~urnK ~a~s.~rrt
FJiUR69~+~iI ~
w
KOOUN~~
vwu2E d~lECT011 .
A.:`JOUNTAKTAtAG'fT AMK~li ~
i' SPKIAIEI
nc'_a0UN7iNf3 MAIWOBI
i' BPECIALIST
nLOOl1NTtiMJSllOfiET NIAL1'fit
~GDOUriTAlRAKJDO~T ANN.1'IIT ~
t'.LSr[satalfMl ~C7W11lTRA~On
•:1 F rN
. i aVi 1~
11 M A
- - - - - - - - -
Section 6: Diagrams
.
.
• . ~ .
L^gend
- I
i nmm f►YM ~
/ n~nuwowiu~ut
v~
I
I I
CITY MANAGER Cm ~ COUNCIL Connlcqon Type
COUNCtL ~ CHAlMIdER
~
o--wrAn aar--op, ~
~ -
` i . ,
STAFF ENTRY O~'EK4T10NS 8 MAIN LOBBY ~----~PUdLIC ENTRY i
~ ADMINISTFta1'ION
. ~
~
I
~
LEOAL I' ~
(Nlernattvo ~ G/►LLlRY !
l.ocs►tion) LEASE SPACE
i
~
- .
1
~
• • ~ : ~ - ' ~ • ~ -
R ~1 ~
Log!nd - -
1--------- 1
~ /VNNC MkM ~
~-__---_---I
- `wfArfMOM4{NL70
I , ' MAOI
COMMUNITY COMMUNITY T"w
DEVELOPMENT: DEVELOPMENT:
I
PLANNING O£YELOPMENT umn
p-ariur aar~
~
; COiVIMVNITY
sTAFF ENTRr OEVELOAMENT: Tl-----*UPPER LOBBY ~
~ PERfdIT C@NTER
~ , -----~i
~
COMMUNfTY
DEVELOPMENT: LEAfE SPACE
BUILDINIf
\
• ' • ~ _ ~ ~ • ~ '
D w x
l.egerod
~ PLMA MAmr ~
MaC!
CennatNen Tppe
RiNANGE LEt3AL/LEA9E
p-nAre oNLm---- p
~
; UPPER ;
I.T. ~ LOBBY i
STAFF 8REJ1K pUBLiC
& EXERCiSF WORKS
ROOM ~
~ • - ~ : • - . • • ' -
P K ~
Entrmntn
SeMOe b
3uppoA l.eg81
830 M (ANWtillr0 Loo~)
1iT6 if
City Meneper
Yenlql ~ ~u a
Ckcuisuon
a[1 rr
Restrooms C!!y CC111KN
~v Msin PubUc
Lobby
M.r
C3ailery
Le~se
Sp~ce Cound Chambars
,ers r zeoo r
Meln Publlc
Entrarm
outdoar PuDlic Mafn Level Totai: +1- 16,977 sf
PlaZa I~~ aMSir~rvn Icrauon $~r (.ppl pW.)
' ~ ~ ~ ~ • •
~ M ,l
Space Diagram
Communiry Community
DevelopmenC Qevalopment:
Ptanning Devebpment S~ ~
z~w a Er~gineerfng
VtrNCeI Rest
f'8rmi► Circulatron Roorre.s
L'`fli1~Ef ~~0 d ~SO s1
1.~•r3 Y~
~ S9COAd LQ11~~
Community Labby
Devefopme~r rao a -
8uiiding
at~~ Expanalon !
oo•~ m ~o~. Lease Spsoe
~.xa.►
Second Level TotalI 13,538 sf
Preliminary - D . . approximate)
~ M A
VAOR
i
Space Diagram
Legat
~ ~ ~ Room
S~~ VerUcal Resl I.T.
~ ~i Ctrcutalion Roor~a ~.r
650 d aSO st
Preliminary t.475 sr F~n871G~ 3tM BnQak
Pubilc Works ~
s r~o.+ Expartsian
Spece
1.750 N
aMum
Ops~ w Bebw
Third ~evel Total~ 14.915 sf
- Diagram . approximate)
is
Space Diagram
Medranical q~~
E~~~ Storage
Ph~aneR)t~tn t .aTS ,n
t t00 ~1
S~~ VertiCtll
~ ~ Chcu{ation
Storage
- ,.eTS sf
BSSQrt1Eft1 ~Obby
so0 d
Stafi Training /
Multi-Purpose Room Unfinished
~2so,~ SPace
? 5Q0 sf
6asement L~vel Tetal~ 10.550 sf
. -
Preliminary Space D .
n ~
Section 7: Systems Narratives
r'
•
~ y~
•
. ~ ~ , . . w4 .
. .
' r
Systems Narrative
1
' , ~r~ ~ ~ •
Civil
~ ~ . ~
r~~ • Structural
.
~ , r ~ , ~ • Mechanical
~ • A , 'p . ~ 9
r
_ ' . • Electrical
~
: ~
.a - ~ - - . -
.
r
L~~ I~~ ,~~r_ ~ ~ 1
I ~ _ F`~ ~
G , r
I 'U t -
1 I,-~ ,~i ~I - 4 ~ f'.~
~ ~
- ~ -
r I - ~ ~
i
, ' ~
~ ~ i
~
- . . . ~
Comparables
Inland Northwest
• Coeur d'Alene Public Library (Completed): 39,450sf $156/sf
• Post Falls City Hall (95% Complete): 41,000 sf $183/sf
Western Washington
-
• Burien City Hall (in construction): 48,480 sf $286/sf
• Kenmore City Hail (in design): 40,000 sf $315/sf
• Olympia City Hall (in design): 90,000 sf $360/sf
• Puyallup City Hall (95% complete): 53,000 sf $3821sf
• Sammamish City Hall (completed): 60,000 sf $302/sf
• Shoreline City Hall (in design): 67,000 sf $4551sf
~
~ i~
Construction Costs
TABLE 1
,AIR Descrlption Cost per Size Total Cost Eacalation Total Escala~ted
SF C~
Basement ~100 10,550 sf $'f,055,000 b265,122 ~1,320,122
Buildin $210 43,755 sf ~9,188,550 $2,309,0B3 $11,497,633
Site a6 130,680 sf $784,080 $197,039 $981,119
GC LEEO Cost ~2~,000 55,02fi $25,026
LEED Gold $220,953 $55,625 $2T6,478
Premium
TOTAL 54,305 sf 511,268,583 52,831,795 Z14,1003T7
w
. , ,
Table 2
Dascri tfon Notes Cost
Change Order Contin en 5% of constnucfion oost $705,019
Fixtures, Furnishings. Equipment Mix of new and existing $1,000,000
(allowance oniy w/ owner to
verify)
D n Fees' 12.5% of construction cost $1,762,547
Geo Technical Estimate $25,000
Surve Estimate $25,000
Washington State Sales Tax 8.6% Construction & Change $1,273,264
Cont.
Testing & Inspection Estimate $20,000
Permit & Fees includin L&i Estimafie $200,000
Energy Review Estimate $10,000
LEED Commissioning Estmate $70,000
A/E LEED Cost Estimate $80.000
TOTAL $5,1 T0,830
~ M Il
Section 9: Project Timeline
,
rr
. r_
~ I
r ~
f
_ e
~ . .
-r ` P R Qfi k_E
JAN ' FEB IIAR " APR MAY JU11 JDL = AUG SEP OCT NOV ; DEC
PROKRAII A►PROVAI : OESI6N
PR06RAMKlN6 • SITE VLAHNiNG STUDY PHASC
~ PNASE LA11A PURCNAII£I
11EGOTtATIOR
~ DtStoN
PMASE
i
~ City ; pERfMITE : D1D : COMTRAGT : CO1tSTRVCT20N
ilEV1EM •
~ CONaTRUCTIOl1 CITY
novE IM
- - - -
~
C I T Y H A L L
DRAFT• PROJECT OVERVIEW TIMELINE ~
. ,
_ _ a
J U N E 1 7 , 2008
crr,••
00000
~
.
~
~i-
_ , _
Ase .
. ,
~
.t _
- - A-t
~
City • ~h ' F
fi
.
` 4
~I
.
Programming 0
June I 2008
n A -
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
0 informataon ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: City Hall Site Planning Contract
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: The draft City Center Subarea Plan recommends that City Hall be (ocated on
~ the site west of the new relocated Dartmouth Road. The Core Team for City Center has
recommended that we explore the site west of the current Dartmouth location and the new site
that would be created if Dartmouth were relocated as shown on the proposed City Center Core
Plan. Attached is a draft proposal from Bernardo WiIIs/GGLO for that work. VVe will present the
information as and administrative report on July 15i and as a motion consideration on July 84h.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS Draft City Hall Site Planning Proposal
i
~
~
June 1, 2008
A4r. Neil Kersten, AIA
City of Spofcane Valley .
11707 E. Sprague, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Re: City Hall Conceptual Site Plan
DRQFT .
Dear NeiL•
In accordance with our recent telephone conversation and understanding of the task, we are pleased to
offer the following revised fee proposal for preliminary site planning services:
A. Proiect Descriqtion: The project consists of analysis and conceptual site plann9ng for a 2 to 4-acre
parcel of land near the west end of the former University City Shopping Center for the purpose of
defining the preferred City Hall site. The site that has been tentatively seletted is the westerly
most portion of the U-City shopping center generally west of and fronting on Dartmouth Road;
however, one of the key considerations is the possible relocation of Dartmouth Road and it's
implications to both the City Hall site as well as the City Center site in terms of planning and
infrastructure casts. Atthough the exterior program is not yet formally defined, planning work is
expecteti to indude the building footprint 55,000 sf building with t/- 20,000 sf footprint) with
0 expansion area; suitable front, rear, and side yards; formal and informal public open space; public
and staff parking; bio-filtration swales; plaza and hardscaping; and similar spaces typical to a
municipal building. Additionally, some conceptual site planning of the City Center development
and it's impact on the City Hall site may also be appropriate although extensive site planning of the
City Center is not a part of the work at this time.
B. Scope of Work for Basic Services: The intent of Basic Services is to perform preliminary site plan
studies to assist the City in evaluating the oppor[unities available for development and define the
dcsired parceL To move the project forward, the following general tasks are expected:
1. Preliminary Site Planning: This task will develop conceptual site plan layout options of the site
illustrating overall site organization (building footprint, landscaping, parking, plazas, etc.) and
the relationship of the City Hall site to the future adjacent City Center development as well as
the impact of relocating Dartmouth. Wor1c may include review of existing surveys (if any) and
data, documentation of existing conditions, and site plan drawings and diagrams. The site
plans will be general in nature and are not intended to be a final design document. This task
wilt be based on a topographic and boundary survey of the U-City Shopping Center provided to
us by the City or property awner.
2. Project Administration: This task indudes zoning code and Sprague/Appleway Revitalization
development standards research and commentary as they apply to the City Hall site; general
consultation with the Owner and consultant team; meetings with City Staff, Cicy Council,
worksdiop sessions, and one City Hall/City Center charette session with the City and City Center
developer. This task may also indude the review of civil engineering and survey work,
caisulting with the Owner on the overall City Center development as well as assisting the Ciry
in obtaining any special engineering studies such as sUrveys, traffic studies, geotechnical
investigations, environmental assessments, etc.
3. Preliminary Civil Engineering: This task indudes general comparison of civil engineering issues
of the two sites under consideration and based on the preferred site, preliminary civil
engineering analysis induding grading, drainage, and utility infrascructure to assist in
~ J establishing future project scope and casts.
4. Cost Estimates: Based on the conditionally approved site plan, prepare a preliminary
construction cost estimate for site and off-site worlc in the immediate area of the project
including infrastructure and relocation of Dartmouth as appropriate.
5. Graphic Exhibits: Prepare graphic ex.hibits to assist with projecYs presentatian at public
meetings/hearings (if any) or in promotionaUmarlceting materials. Graphic exhibits may ;
include colored presentaiion style site plans, diagrams, maps, and tharts.
C. Fee Proposal for Basic Services: The exact nature and extent of our services is difficult to
determine because much of our work is in response to requests from agencies, potential users, the
Owner or consultant team, and other influences beyond our control. We can provide you with the
most cost-effective services if our fee is based on our standard hourly rate schedule with provisions
for reimbursable expenses with the following budget:
1. Preliminary Site Planning (for the 2 sites under consideration) 530,OU0-43,500
2. Project Administration 7,500-10,000
3. Preliminary Civil Engineering 10,000-12,500
4. Cost Estimates 2,00D•3,000
5. Graphic Exhibits 4,000-6,000
Total Estimated Fee 53,500-75,U00
DRAFT
The above is an es[imate only and the hours may fluctuate between tasks as the project becomes
more defined. We will invoice monthly but will not exceed $65,000.00 without your prior approval.
D. Services Not Included in Basic Services: The following services are not included in Basic Services
but can be added if necessary or requested:
< Topographic and Boundary Survey
< Platting or subdivision processing, rezone applications or similar land use actions
< Geotechnical Investigations, Traffic Study or Environmentat Assessments
< Parcel specific Architectural Design or Engineering .
< Revising previously approved worlc
< Preliminary Strucwral, Mechanical or Electrical Engineering
< Computer animation or professional artist rendering
E. Time Schedule: The time and fee allotted for this work assumes that the work can move farward in a directed and focused manner and be completetl in 70 to 100 days.
F. Reimbursable ExQenses: 7he following costs are direttly associated with the project ancl are
invoiced as reimbursable expenses at 1.10 times our direct costs.
< Printing and overnight shipping
< Fees paid to regulatory agendes for project review
< Travel expenses for GGLO (if authorized in advance)
This fee proposal is intended to be short and concise, but we can provide additional information at
your request. If this is accep[able to you, please retumeci a signeci topy to our office and we can
schedule a kick-off ineeting and begin work. If you have any questions, please lec me know.
Sincerely,
DRAFT
Gary M. Bernardo, AIA
Principal
Accepted by:
Signed Date
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2008 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ neui business [1 public hearing
~ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Appointment to the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System Performance
and Financial Audit Selection Committee
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: An oversight committee comprised of elected officials has been formed for
~ the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System Performance and Financial Audit. That committee
is a sub-set of the Liaison Board with four members representing each of the various
jurisdictions: Spokane City, Spokane County, Spokane Valley and the Regional Cities.
Additionally, a Selection Committee will be formed comprised of staff members appointed by
each of the four jurisdictions, hopefully someone with knowledge of solid waste. A fifth member
will be an independent agreed upon by the other four. The Selection Committee will
recommend the most qualified firm to the Director of the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System
(see Part V, Section 5.1 in the RFQ). With Council's concurrence we will prepare an
administrative report for July 1, 2008 and a motion to approve on July 8, 2008.
OPTIONS: Appoint the Public Works Director or other appropriate staff inember to the Selection Committee. .
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGETfFINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Neil Kersten
ATTACHMENTS RFQ for Spokane Regional Solid Waste System Performance Audit
~ ~ .
'/~C1~~'(' CITY OF SPOKANE -
S-prO~~~,L ~l~ PURCHASING
808 W. Spokane Falls Blvd.
Spokane, Washington 99201-3316 ,
(509) 625-6400
FAX (509) 625-6413
~ll
Mary Verner
MAYOR '
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND
PROPOSALS
CITY OF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON
RFQ/P NUMBER: 3497-08
DESCRIPTION: SPOKANE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM
PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL AUDIT
~
DUE DATE: MONDAY, JULY 21, 2008
NO LATER THAN 1:00 P.M.
Purchasing Dept.
4T" Floor - City Hall
808 W. Spokane Falis Bivd.
Spokane WA 99201-3316
Purchasing Department
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Purpose .....................................................................................................................1
1.2 Background ...............................................................................................................1
1.3 Definitions .................................................................................................................2
1.4 Contracting with Current or Former Employees .........................................................2
II.Scope of Services ..................................................................................................................................3
2.1 Overview of the Work ................................................................................................3
III. Generallnformation ...........................................................................................................................4
3.1 RFQIP Coordinator .............................................--.--..................................................4
3.2 Estimated Schedule of Procurement Activities ...........................................................5
3.3 Submission of Proposals ...........................................................................................5
3.4 Proprietary Information/Public Disclosure ..................................................................6
3.5 Revisions to the RFQ/P .............................................................................................6
3.6 Minority & Women-Owned Business Participation .....................................................6
.
3.7 Acceptance Penod 6
3.8 Responsiveness ........................................................................................................6
3.9 Most Favorable Terms ...............................................................................................7
3.10 Cost to Propose .........................................................................................................7
3.11 No Obligation to Contract ..........................................................................................7
3.12 Rejection of Proposals 7
IV. Proposal 8 Content ...........................................................................................................................7
4.1 Preparation of Proposal .............................................................................................7
4.2 Letter of Submittal ............7
V. Proposal Evaluation ..........................................................................................................................8
5.1 Evaluation Procedure ................................................................................................8
5.2 Selection Committee .................................................................................................8
5.3 Proposal Evaluation ..................................................--.._....................................._......8
5.4 Oral Presentations may be required ..........................................................................9
5.5 Award of Contract ......................................................................................................9
5.6 Debriefing of Unsuccessful Proposers .......................................................................9
5.7 Protest Procedure ....................................................................................................10
VI. Contract Terms & Requirements ...................................................................................................10
6.1 Contract Term .......10
-
6.2 City of Spokane Business License ........:..................................................................10
6.3 Anti-Kickback ...........................................................................................................10
6.4 Disputes ..................................................................................................................10
6.5 Nondiscrimination ...10
6.6 Liability ....................................................................................................................11
6.7 Insurance ...11
6.8 Termination Clause .................................................................................................12
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
FOR A PERFORMANCE AND FINANCIAL AUDIT
SPOKANE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM
PART I. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System), a department of the City
of Spokane, is seeking the services of a qualified firm to conduct a performance
and financial audit on the System. The overall goal of this performance and
financial audit is to identify opportunities that will improve the System's efficiency
and effectiveness as well as its accountability to the City of Spokane, Spokane
County, and the Regional Cities.
1.2 BACKGROUND
The City of Spokane manages two separate departments (and affiliated
enterprise funds) dealing with the management of municipal solid waste. The
~ Solid Waste Management Depa►tment (Solid Waste Management) is responsible
for the collection of solid waste generated within the City of Spokane. The
Spokane Regional Solid Waste System (System) was created in 1988 through an
intedocal agreement betv+reen the City of Spokane and Spokane County to
provide for solid waste disposal services for waste collected within the City of
Spokane and the unincorporated areas of the County. Subsequently, all the
regional cities within Spokane County and Fairchild Air Force Base joined the
System,
Under the interlocal agreement between the City of Spokane and Spokane
County, the System is owned and managed by the City of Spokane. As provided
for in the interlocal agreement, there exists a policy Liaison Board comprised of
elected officials from the City of Spokane, Spokane County and the Regional
Cities to create a forum for discussion concerning the waste to energy facility.
Major decisions including tipping fee adjustments and expenditures over $1
million dollars require approval of both the Spokane City Council and Spokane
County.
The System operates as a department of the City of Spokane's government
under provisions of a City Ordinance. It is under the general direction of a
director, who is appointed by the Mayor. The director is responsible for System
operations. The City Council approves the System's budget, sets rates, approves
financing, and other items outlined in the City Municipal Code. The System has
~ 8 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees.
~JJ The service area of the System (Service Area) encornpasses the entire County.
The principal facilities of the System include an 800-ton-per-day, mass-burn
1
RFQIP 3497-08
7/21/08
waste-to-energy facility, the Northside Regional Landfill, two Solid Waste transfer
stations, three recycling centers and household hazardous waste facilities, the
use of non-system landfills to dispose of by-pass waste and non-processible
waste, and the use of a private contractor for composting certain yard and
garden debris. The waste to energy facility is operated by a private contractor.
The Northside Regional Landfill, the transfer stations, recycling centers and
household haiardous waste facilities, as well as the scale systems and
residential tipping floor at the waste to energy facility, are operated by Solid
Waste Management on behalf of the System, These operations are funded
through interfund transfers from the System to Solid Waste Management. Solid
Waste Management has approximately 187 FTE employees, approximately 89 of
whom perform solid waste collection work, and 98 of whom perform work on
behalf of the System, operating System facilities.
The County Flow Control Ordinance (85-0395, as amended) requires that the
solid waste generated within the unincorporated county be delivered to the
System facilities for disposal. Individual interlocal agreements with all
incorporated municipalities and Fairchild Air Force Base require solid waste they
generate also be delivered to System facilities for disposal.
1.3 DEFINITIONS
Definitions are for the purpose of this RFQ/P include:
System - The System is the Spokane Regional Solid Waste System, a • \
department of the City of Spokane, a Washington State municipal corporation '
that is issuing this RFQIP.
Consultant - Individual or company whose proposal has been accepted by the
City and is awarded a fully executed, written contract.
Proposal - A formal offer submitted in response to this solicitation.
Proposer - Individual or company submitting a Proposal in order to attain a
contract with the City.
Request for Qualifications and Proposals (RFQ/P) - Formal procurement
document in which a service or need is identified but no specific method to
achieve it has been chosen. The purpose of an RFQ/P is to permit the
consultant community to submit their qualifications and to suggest various
approaches to meet the need identified.
1.4 CONTRACTING WITH CURRENT OR FORMER CITY EMPLOYEES
Specific restrictions apply to contracting with current or former City officers and
employees pursuant to the Code of Ethics in Chapter 1.04 of the Spokane
Municipal Code. Proposers should familiarize themselves with the requirements
prior to submitting a proposal trat includes cuRent or former City officers or
employees.
RFQlP 3497-08 2
7/21l08
1
PART II. SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.1 OVERVIEW OF THE WORK
Scope of Work •
The work performed in this audit will be done under an Oversight Committee
comprised of a subcommittee of the Regional Solid Waste Liaison Board
selected by the Chair and composed of one elected official each from the City of
Spokane, City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, and other regional cities.
The Oversight Committee will define goals and objectives for the audit, and
review the draft audit report.
In addition, there will be a core Technical Work Group comprised of staff from the
System, City of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Valley, and other regional
cities that have expertise in the financial and operational aspects of the System.
The Technical Work Group will interface with the consultant throughout the audit
to provide information and detailed guidance on the progress of the work.
The scope of worfcc for this audit includes at least the following:
1. Incorporating generally accepted accounting principles and following
Governmental Accounting Standards Board pronouncements, develop a
O performance and financial audit work plan and review the plan with the project's
Oversight Committee and Technical Work Group before proceeding with the
audit.
2. Review the System's maintenance and operations and any other rnajor
services and pragrams funded by the System.
3. Review the System's capital project planning and implementation.
4. Compare the System's performance to the goals and objectives established
by the Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan.
Recommend program and staffing needs to reach any unmet goals and
objectives.
5. Review and assess the overall financial perFormance of the System's Waste-
to-Energy facility compared to similar facilities.
6a. Review and assess general budgeting and accounting practices and
procedures, and how budget forecasts relate to actual expenditures. *
b. Review and assess how the City allocates and accounts for Citywide and
departmental costs between the City's non-System and System services and
programs. Develop recommendations on whether and how the City should
change those allocations.
~ 7. Review the rate setting and revenue sharing processes and methodologies
and determine if they are c4nsistent with the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement
RF(UP 3497-08 3
7/21/08
and rate setting best practices. Develop recommendations on whether and how i
the City should change those processes and methodologies.
8. Conduct a benchmarking survey of at least three comparable jurisdictions to
compare the System's operations, staffing, and costs and make •
recommendations of any industry best practices that can be applied to the
System's operations, including subsequent program efficiencies, savings, or
costs in meeting those best practices.
9. Review the flow of information and communication to and from the System,
stakeholders and the public. Develop recommendations on whether and how the
Systern could change procedures to better communicate and distribute
information.
10. Review and assess the overall regional program and administrative services
and performance provided by the System compared to similar solid waste
systems.
11. Based upon the audit findings, identify any clarifications or recommended
changes that should be made to the management of the System within the
parameters of the City and County Interlocal Cooperation Agreement. Make
recommendations of efficiencies, savings, or costs in implementing those
changes.
12. Prepare a draft report for review and provide thirty bound copies. 13. Make one presentation on the report to each of ihe following: Spokane
County, City of Spokane, Liaison Board and the Solid Waste Advisory Committee
(SWAC).
14. Revise the draft report based on review comments from Spokane County,
City of Spokane, Liaison Board, and SWAC, and provide thirty bound copies and
one electronic copy of the final report.
PART III. GENERAL INFORMATION
3.1 RFQ/P COORDINATOR
The RFQ/P Coordinator is the sole point of contact in the City for this
procurement. All communication between the Consultant and the City upon
receipt of this RFQ/P shall be with the RFQ/P Coordinator, as follows:
Name Russ Menke, Director
Address S okane Re ional Solid Waste S stem
E-Mail Address rmenke@spokanecity.org
Any other communication will be considered unofficial and non-binding on the City.
Consultants are to rely on written statements issued by the RFQ/P Coordinator. ~
Communication directed to parties other than the RFQJP Coordinator rnay resuft in
disqualification of the Consultant.
RFQ1P 3497-08 4
7121l08
~
3.2 ESTIMATED SCHEDULE OF PROCUREMENT ACTIVITIES
Issue Re uest for Qualifcations and Proposals Ma 19, 2008 .
Submission of written uestions regardin RFQ/P June 17, 2008
Pre- roposal Conference June 24, 2008
Pro osals due July 21 2008
The C'rty reserves the right to revise the above schedule.
3.3 SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
A. PREPARATION OF ENVELOPES
Place each copy of the Proposal in a separate sealed envelope. On the front
of each envelope clearly note if it contains the original or a copy and place the
following information:
"SEALED PROPOSAL - IMPORTANT"
RFQ/P - SPOKANE REGIONAL SOLID WASTE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE
AND FINANCIAL AUDIT
DUE 7121/2008 - 1:00 P.M.
COMPANY NAME
~ B. SUBMISSION OF PROPOSAL
Submit Six (6) Proposal documents, as follows:
Original Proposal and Five (5) copies to: City of Spokane - Purchasing
4`h Floor - City Hall
808 West Spokane Falls Blvd.
Spokane WA 99201
NOTE: Proposals will not be accepted by fax or email
C. DUE DATE
It is the responsibility of the Proposer to be sure the Proposals are sent
sufficiently ahead of time to be received no later than 1:00 PM local time on
MONDAY, JULY 21, 2008.
Proposers mailing Proposals should allow normal mail delivery time to ensure
timely receipt of their proposals. The City reserves the right to not consider
Proposals received late. Sealed Proposals will be publicly acknowledged at 1:15 PM on the due date
in the City of Spokane City Hall Council Chambers, 808 West Spokane Falls
Blvd, Spokane WA 99201.
5
' RFQ/P 3497-08
7/21lOS
i
3.4 PROPRIETARY INFORMATIONIPUBUC DISCLOSURE
Materials submitted in response to this competitive procurernent shall become the
property of the City.
All received Proposals shall remain confidential until the award of contract
recommendation has been filed with the City Clerk for City Council action.
Thereafter, the Proposals shall be deemed public records as defined in RCW
42.17.250 to 42.17.340, "Public Records.n
Any information in the Proposal that the Consultant desires to claim as proprietary
and exempt from disclosure under the provisions of state law shall be clearly
designated. Each page claimed to be exempt from disclosure must be clearly
identified by the word "Confidential° printed on it. Marking the entire Proposal
exempt from disclosure will not be honored. .
The City will consider a Proposer's request for exemption from disclosure;
however, the City will make a decision predicated upon state law and regulations.
If any information is marked as proprietary in the Proposal, it will not be made
' available until the affected Proposer has been given an opportunity to seek a court
injunction against the requested disclosure.
All requests for information should be directed to the RFQIP Coordinator.
3.5 REVISIONS TO THE RFQ1P
In the event it becomes necessary to revise any part of this RFQIP, addenda will
be provided to all who receive the RFQ/P. For this purpose, pertinent information
shall be provided as an addendum to the RFQIP.
The City also reserves the right to cancel or to reissue the RFO/P in whole or in
part, prior to the final award of a contract.
3.6 MINORITY & WOIVIEN-OWNED BUSINESS PARTICIPATION
The City encourages participation in all of its contracts by firms certified by the
Washington State Office of Minority and Women's Business Enterprises
(OMWBE). Proposers may contact OMWBE at 360/753-9693 to obtain information
on certified firms.
3.7 ACCEPTANCE PERIOD
Proposals must provide sixty (60) days for acceptance by the City from the due
date for receipt of Proposals. Acceptance period may be extended by mutual
consent.
3.8 RESPONSIVENESS
The Proposer is specifically notified that failure to c4mply with any part of the ~
RFQIP may result in rejection of the Proposal as non-responsive.
RFQ/P 3497-08 6
.
7/21/08
The CitY also reserves the right, however, at its sole discretion to waive minor
administrative irregularities.
3.9 MOST FAVORABLE TERMS The City reserves the right to make an award without further discussion of the
Proposal submitted. Therefore, the Proposal should be submitted initially on the
most favorable terms which the Consultant can propose. The City reserves the
right to contact a Proposer for clarification of its Proposal. .
3.10 COSTS TO PROPOSE
' The City will not be liable for any costs incurred by the Proposer in preparation of a
Proposal submitted in response to this RFQ/P, in conduct of a presentation, or any
other activities related to responding to this RFQ/P.
3.11 NO OBLIGATION TO CONTRACT
This RFQ/P does not obligate the City to contract for services specified herein.
3.12 REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City resenres the right at its sole discretion to reject any and all Proposals
~ received without penalty and to not issue a contract as a result of this RFQ/P.
PART IV. PROPOSAL AND CONTENT
4.1 PREPARATION OF PROPOSAL
Proposals shall be in the following standardized format to facilitate evaluation of
their comparative merits. Proposals shall include the sections indicated below.
Proposals shall be typed.
Letter of Submittal
1) Project Approach .
' 2) Project Team
3) Experience
4) Project Schedule
5) Project Cost
4.2 LETTER OF SUBMITTAL
The Letter of Submittal shall be signed and dated by a person authorized to legally
bind the Consultant to a contractual relationship; e.g., the president or executive
director if a corporation, the managing partner if a partnership, or the proprietor if a
sole proprietorship. Along with introductory remarks, the Letter of Submittal is to
~ j include the following information about the Consultant and any proposed
subcontractors:
RFQ/P 3497-08 7
7l21108
1. Name, address, principal place of business, telephone number, and fax
number/e-mail address of legal entity or individual with whom contract
would be written. 2. Legal status of the Consultant (sole proprietorship, partnership;
corporation,etc.). •
3. Location of the facility from which the Consultant would operate.
4. Identify any current or forrner City employees employed by or on the
firm's governing board as of the date of the proposal or during the
previous twelve (12) months.
5. Acknowledgement that the Consultant will comply vuith all terms and
conditions set forth in the Request for Proposals, unless otherwise agreed
by the City. .
PART V. PROPOSAL EVALUATION
5.1 EVALUATION PROCEDURE
Responsive Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the stated in this
solicitation and any addenda issued. Evaluation of Proposals shall be
accomplished by a Selection Committee as described below. :
The City, at its sole discretion, may elect to select the top-scoring firms as finalists
for an oral presentation.
The RFQIP Coordinator may contact the Consultant for clarification of any portion
of the Consultant's proposal.
5.2 SELECTION COMMITTEE
The Selection Committee for this project will be comprised of five members, one
staff member each from the City of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Valley,
the other regional cities, and one member chosen by the other four members of the
selection committee. The committee members will rank each completed proposal
based on the criteria outlined below. The Committee will recommend selection of
the most highly qualified firm to the Director of the Spokane Regional Solid Waste
System. .
5.3 PROPOSAL EVALUATION
Submittals will be evaluated and ranked based on the following criteria:
a) Project Approach
a) Understanding of the scope of project ,
b) Description of approach to project
c) Ability to organize and accomplish project of this type .
RFQIp 3497-08 8
7121/fl8
b) Project Team
a) Project team clearly identified and available for the project
b) Education and qualifications of the project team
c) Project team encompasses all necessary disciplines
and skills to perform project scope
d) Location of team members
c) Previous Experience .
a) Experience with this type of project
b) Demonstrated record of keeping costs within budgets
d) Project Schedule
a) Detailed schedule that indicates all necessary task and completion
dates
b) Project teamJavailability can realistically meet schedule
e) Project Cost
a) Detailed estimate of hours of effort by task
b) Proposed billing rates for assigned individuals
c) Total project cost
5.4 ORAL PRESENTATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED
~ Written submittals and oral presentations, if considered necessary, will be utilized
in selecting the winning Proposal. The City, at its sole discretion, may elect to
select the top scoring finalists from the written evaluation for an oral presentation
and final determination of contract award. Should the City elect ta hold oral
presentations, it will contact the top-scoring firm(s) to schedule a date, time and
location. Commitments made by the Consultant at the oral interview, if any, will be
considered binding.
5.5 AWARD OF CONTRACT
This RFQ/P does not obligate the City to award a contract.
The City of Spokane reserves the option to split or make the award of this contract
in any manner most advantageous for the City at its sole and exclusive discretion.
More than one (1) contract may be awarded.
Award of contract, when made, will be to the Proposer whose Proposal is the most
favorable to the City, taking into consideration negotiated price and RFQ/P
evaluation factors. The City Council shall make the award of contract.
Unsuccessful Proposers will not automatically be notified of Proposal results.
5.6 DEBRIEFING OF UNSUCCESSFUL PROPOSERS
Upon request, a debriefing conference will be scheduled with an unsuccessful
Proposer.' Discussion will be limited to a cfitique of the requesting Consultant's
Proposal. Comparisons between Proposals or evaluations of the other Proposals
RFQIP 3497-08 9
7121 /08
~
will not be allowed. Debriefing conferences may be conducted in person or on the
telephone.
5.7 PROTEST PROCEDURE
Following evaluation, a recommendation for award shall be submitted to the City
Council. Award of contract, if made, shall be by the City Council in open meeting.
Proposers wishing to protest the award of the contract must make their protests
before the City Council at the award hearing.
PART VI. CONTRACT TERMS AND REQUIREMENTS 6.1 CONTRACT TERM .
The contract term is for a one-year period beginning upon Council approval,
estimated to begin August, 2008. Contract renewals or extensions, if any, shall be
at the sole discretion of the City. The contract may be extended for two (2)
additional one-year contract periods, subject to mutual agreement, with the total
contract period not to exceed three (3) years.
6.2 CITY OF SPOKANE BUSINESS LICENSE
Persons / firms doing business in the City or with the City must have a valid City of ,
Spokane business license. Questions may be directed to the Taxes and Licenses .i
Division at (509) 625-6070.
6.3 ANTI-KICKBACK
No officer or employee of the City of Spokane, having the power or duty to perform an
official act or action related to this contract shall have or aoquire any interest in the
contract; or have solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service
or other thing of value from or to any person involved in the contract.
6.4 DISPUTES
This contract shall be performed under the laws of Washington State. Any litigation to
enforce this contract or any of its provisions shall be brought in Spokane County,
Washington.
6.5 NONDISCRIMINATION
No individual shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefit of,
subjected to discrimination under, or denied employment in the administration of or
in connection with this agreement because of age, sex, race, color, religion, creed,
marital status, familial status, sexual orientation, national origin, honorably
discharged veteran or military status, the presence of any sensory, mental or
physical disability, or use of a service animal by a person with disabilities. ,
;RFQ/P 3497-08 10
7/21108
6.6 LIABILITY
The Consuitant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers and
employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the
Consultant's negligence or breach or its obligations under the contract. The
ConsultanYs duty to indemnify shall not apply to liability caused by the sole
negligence of the City, its officers and employees. The Consultant's duty to indemnify
for liability arising from the concurrent negligence of the City, its officers and
employees and the Consultant, its officers and employees shall apply only to the
extent of the negligence of the Consuftant; its officers and employees. The
ConsultanYs duty to indemnify shall survive termination or expiration of the contract.
The Consultant waives, with respect to the City only, its immunity under RCW Title
51, Industrial Insurance.
6.7 INSURANCE COVERAGE
During the term of the contract, the Consuitant shall maintain in force at its own
expense, each insurance coverage noted below:
A. Worker's Compensation Insurance in compliance with RCW 51.12.020, which
requires subject employers to provide workers' compensation coverage for all
their subject worlcers and Employers Liability Insurance in the amount of
$1,000,000;
~ B. General Liability Insuranc,e on an occurrence basis, with a combined single limit of
not less than $1,000,000 each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
It shall include contractual liability coverage for the indemnity provided under this
contract. It shall provide that the City, its officers and employees are additional
insureds but only with respect to the Consultant's services to be provided under
this contract; and
C. Automobile Liability Insurance with a combined single limit, or the equivalent of
not less than $1,000,000 each accident for bodily injury and property damage,
including coverage for owned, hired and non-owned vehicles.
D. Professional Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of not less than
$1,000,000 each claim, incident or occurrence. This is to cover damages caused
by the error, omission, or negligent acts related to the professional services to be
provided under this contract. The coverage must remain in effect for at least two
(2) years after the contrac# is completed.
There shall be no cancellation, material change, reduction of limits or intent not to
renew the insurance coverage(s) without sixty (60) days written notice from the
Consuitant or its insurer(s) to the City.
As evidence of the insurance coverages required by this contrac#, the Consultant
shall furnish acceptable insurance certificates to the City at the time it returns the
~ signed contract. The certificate shall specify all of the parties who are additional
insured, and include applicable policy endorsements, the sixty (60) day cancellation
clause, and the deductible or retention level, as well as policy limits. Insuring
11
RFQlP 3497-08
7/21/08
companies or entities are subject to City acceptance and must have a rating of A- or
higher by Best. Copies of all applicable endorsements shall be provided. The
Consultant shall be financially responsible for all pertinent deductibles, self-insured
retentions, andJor self-insurance.
6.8 TERMINATION CLAUSE
Either party may terminate this contract by 30 days written notice to the other party.
i
RFQlP 3497-08 12 i
7121108 '
sT'~okane
O p
y 11707 E. Sprague Ave. • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley,WA 99206
..;0OValle @
(509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org
June 25, 2008
Alan Curryer, CEO
Rockwood Retirement Communities
2903 E. 25`h Ave. Spokane, WA 99223
Dear Alan,
(t is my pleasure to write this letter pledging the support of the City of Spokane Valley for
the grant request that Rockwood Retirement Community is submitting to the Department
of Housing and Urban Development Section 202 Program that will provide affordable
suppoRive senior housing in the City of Spokane Valley.
~ The City Council recognizes the importance of these and other community development
programs and the significant support they bring to the people of eastem Washington.
This proposal to develop 50 units of affordable housing for the elderly residents of
Spokane Valley and the surrounding area is appropriate and timely. The development
that you are proposing would offer additional affordable housing resources for this
vulnerable population and add a valuable asset to our community. We thank you for
your work in addressing this pressing need.
Sincerely,
Richard M. Munson, Mayor
RMM/skp
~
Page 1 of 2
.
hris Bainbridge
rom: Sue Passmore
ent: Friday, June 13, 2008 9:46 AM
fl: Chris Bainbridge
ubject: FW: Letter of Support request for affordable senior housing
ttachments: appleway court project description.doc; appleway court sample support letter.doc
is:
-e you go.
Pa4Sm.ore,
ninistrative Assistant
D7 E. Sprague Av¢nue Ste 106
okane Valley, WA 99206
►-688-0180 Phone
►-688-0194 FAX
m: Christopher Wojtowia [mailto:christopherw@communityframe%works.org]
it: Thursday, June 12, 2008 12:51 PP1
Sue Passmore
Sheila Stillian
)ject: Letter of Support request for affordable senior housing
etings Sue,
a follow-up to our phone conversation taday, please consider my request for a letter of support as described below and attached.
nmunity Frameworks, an affordable housing developer, is working with Rockwood Retirement Communi#ies on a 50-unit
-portive senior housing project for very low income seniors. This much need project vrill be located in Spokane Valley,
shington. Major funding for this much need project will come from the HUD Section 202 program. Part of our application for
D 202 funds includes evidence of community support.
iched are a project description for your information and a sample letter for you to use and/or edit. If you are willing to do so,
3se produce the letter on your letterhead, addressed to Alan Curryer of Roclcwood Retirement Communities, and mailed to my
:ntion at Cornmunity Frameworks, to the address below. If you have any questions, fzel free to contact me.
ny thanks,
istopher Wojtowicz
:ociate Housing Developer
nmuniry Frameaiorks
~ W Mission Ave., Suite 100
)kane, WA 99201
9) 484-6733 ext 110
9) 483-0345 FAX isto hp env(")communityframeworks.org
12 llnnQ
Page 2 oF2
Ve ~ri+ income families buitd affordeble homes and vital communities;
+e her organizations frnsncre and construct affordable housing;
nd an arganization doesn't have the capacity, we'tl develop the projeci for ihem '
~
~
/
APPLEWAY COURT
Affordable Supportive Housing for the Elderly
Spokane Valley, Washington
Pro1ect Description
Rockwood Retirement Communities development at Appleway and Farr Road in
Spokane Valley will be 50 one-bedroom units designed to serve very low-income elderly
households to maintain their independent living status. Appithey uRent y Iha e senhord
senior housing complex for Rockwood in the Spokane area;
housing on the South Hill and on Hawthorne Road in north Spokane. The proposed
project will meet about 2.2 percent of the unmet need for subsidized housing for low-
income seniors.
SGNlCES
Residents living in this facility will not only have access to a wide variety of on-site
services, but they will also have easy access to community services. Appleway Court is
located within a half mile of major retail and commercial centers providing multiple
shopping opportunities and access to professional services. Valley Hospital and the
surrounding medical office district are located within 2 miles. There is easy access to
public transportation o an i that ae lo ated th otughout the'comm will un tyvailable
to access other services d venues ,
Project Financing
The total project cost is expected to be approximately $9.5 million with primary funding
from HUD Section 202 capital advance and Low Income Housing Tax Credits. The HUD
202 program also provides rental subsidies that limit residents' rent to only 30% of their
income.
Please address your fetter of support to:
Alan Curryer, CEO
Rockwood Retirement Communities
2903 E. 25t'' Ave.
Spokane, WA 99223
Pleasc marl your letter of support to:
Christopher Wajtowicz
Community Frameworks
315 W Mission Ave., Suite 100
Spokane, WA 99201
~ Sample Letter for your use. Please edit as necessary.
20 June 2008
Alan Curryer, CEO
Rockwood Retirement Communities
2903 E. 25~' Ave.
Spokane, WA 99223
Dear Alan,
It is my pleasure to write this letter pledging my support for the grant request that
Rockwood Retirement Community is submitting to the Department of Housing and
Urban Development Section 202 program that provides affordable supportive senior
housing.
I recognize the importance of these and other community development programs and
the significant support they bring to the people of Eastern Washington. This proposal to
develop 50 units of affordable housing for the elderly residents of Spokane Valley and
the surrounding area is appropriate and timely. The development that you are proposing
~1 will offer additional affordable housing resources for this vulnerable population and add a
valuable asset to our community. I thank you for your work in addressing this pressing
need. .
Sincerely,
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
PERSONAC STARF ACCOMPUSHMENTS
Mary Kffie MaRin obteined her undergraduate deyroe from Weshlnpton State University in
Leadershfp end Proiesslonal atudbs wfth a coi+e in Engineerinp and Jodl Main obtained her
cert3fication ea e Certified Pertnit Technician.
LONG RANQE PL4NNING:
Ptanning Canmisslon
The Spakane Velley Plannirtg Commlaslon rr}et thres tinnes during the mortth of May to deliberate
on the Sprsgue/Appleway Revitatizetion Plen. The Planning Commisaion elso held e public
hearing regarding updatea to the Comprehenshre Plan and e atroct vacation. The Commisaion
wiA conUnue to meet every week until they have a recommendattan to fonaard to the City Coundl,
8praguelAppleway Revitsll=atlan Plan
The PlannlnQ Commiaelon oontinued with c4elibentions on the Sprague end Appleway Corridora
Subarea Plen, with 2 meetjnga, with Michael Freedrran attending e special meeting he10 Monday,
Msy 6, for a questlon end enswer session.
City Center Pro)ect
ClearPeth LLC continued working with Clty staft on property negotiations far e City Hall aite. Steff
participated in the first neQotiation seasion with the City Certter property owners. City Cerrter/Ciry
Hall siie plannEng Is ongdng wtth weekly Core Tesm maatlrtgs. Staff sttended the monthly
Reglonel SKe Seiedor committee meetine. Clty Coundl epprovad e non-binding Letter af IMent
to purchase property, laying lhe foundabon for negotiations on a Purchase and Sale Apreement
City stafl has compkted the 5elec6on process for oonsultant services to prepare an
envlronmerdal impad 6tatemsrrt end planned action ordinence for the City Cr,nter zone. Staff
presented this inioRneNon to the Council in May end received euthorizaUon hom Coundl to
proceed with firtaltzing the professionel services contract end scape of wor{c for the project
Projact commencemerit ts artticlpated in the SeptembeNOctober timetrame after the Council has
had the oppartunity to revlew and approve the SARP. Council deciaions on the SARP will impact
the dirccbon and acope ot the EIS/PAO project.
CTED Reglonsl Cdlsborstion Orant Project
The CTED Grant Cammittee is currentfy reviawing dratt devebpment rayulations br urban
growth ereas. Studio Gescede has put togeiher an overiay zone with detslia of admtnistretion. A
modified veroion will be presented to City Ccundls and Pianning Commissions in e seriea ot
meeUngs thEs summer. The Committee also met wRfi Brett Scheckter ef Berk end Aaaodeles to
go ovar tfie nexR steps for the ptojea
The Orartt Committee also sponsored e luncheon meettng wtth eleeted afFrcia3s and etaft.
Into►matlon about pateritEal annexatbn areas and funding options wero shar+ed.
Orowth Manaeemerrt Steering Commktee of Etected Offlclals
The GraMh Management Steerinp Committee corrducted a publk hearfng on Mey 21, 2008
ragardtnp proposed amendments to the Courttywide Planning Polfcies regarding ths timing oi the
regienel UGA update process.
Page 1 0! 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
2008 Comprohenshre Plan Amandments/Updates
The City reoefved B privately Inibated comprehensive plen emendmerrt appikations by the
Nrnrember 1, 2007 deedilne. In addVJon, staff identified severai cAmprehens)ve ptan text
emendmenb neceaaary to either updete existing information or to corred inaxurate lnbrtnation.
Theae emendmenta were reviewed by the Ptenning Commisafon at a atudy sesaion on Apnl 24,
and public hearings wero conduded on May 8" and May 22"d. The Commiaslon
recommendebons were forvvardecf to Ciry Coundi tor cons4deration end flnai eclfon.
CURREIVT PLANNING:
Revenue for the Plannfng Dhrision for the month of May was $20,433.
- - -
2008 Pbnnbg Rwenun
aso,ooo
s~a.ooa -t~o.tao -
~ -
~ ` - -
61o,ooo
so
Jm Fao mer Ap1 AIrY AM A*l A W Sw ac: wr Oa
tp /isvenue 200E in::= Rwetaw 20Q) -to- ibvtrue 2006 f I
During the montii of May, Ptenning Dnrision stetf held fifteen commercial pre-application mcetirtgs
and tecefved 3 commercial buiiding pertnits. Plannlrtg Ofviaion etaff epproveti twelve commerciai
bullding permits, which kncludea e 22,000 sf refu6e truck maintenanoe/repair facility for Weste
Management two building edditions - Rosauers Grocery Store and Cenlral Pre-Mix (to enclose
aggregete btna), e 144 epartment camp{ex (Granite Point Apartments) and a change In residencr
lo a dental office on Sprague Ave. The Dlvislon answered 246 phone cails in the permit center
end helped 292 custcmers at the caurtter.
2008 Psrnnks bsued ~
I F~ -
2G ~
I o ~
ri I ti U
I.1an ~ Feb Mp I Apr May Jun .tul Au9 Sep Oct Wv ilec
~ f
~p 2008I 25 20 ~ ta tE 12 I - ~
no= 2pp7 57 13 11 10 ZO I. ta 1e 10 E 0 11
2006 14 ?3 36 34 32 ~ n 12 38 24 21 I 1a 60
Page 2 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
In the month d May, Planning Departrnent stefl accepted 7 boundary line adludmerits, 2
prefiminery short plets, end 6ftnai shvn ptais. Staff cvnducted 9 land use pre-eppfication
meetings and 1 public hearing wse conduded by the Hearing Examiner in Mey. A SEPA
detertninsbon was ebo keaued tor e 65,000 sf Hamptcn Inn buiiding.
ZOOa Nsw Land Use Acfbns
40
so - ----1- ~ _ - - - - -
zo r_ - - _ - - - -
- - ~ -
10
Jtn ~ Fao ~ tita• I AW Wtrl' Jur. - Jul ~ Aup I 5ep . Oct 1bv Gx
p pppe ti 1] 10 . 13 , 11 I r
I~~ 1e ~ ~ v U ~ te 15 a 14 s• » >z
.-e-zooe zo Ie 30 24 : r _ 15 _ as io » 1e , o 8
euILnlao nrnsIoN:
The BuUdinp Ohrision issued 296 permits in May 2008, compared with 451 for the same period
last year. New one end Mro dwelling unit strudure permits tataled 38 and new commerciw
strudure permb tataled four fcr the moMh ot May.
2008 CONSTRUCTION PERIIITS 1
eao ~ -
~
i
ao - _ =
69
~ tii[4 ~ -
° Ar ree u. ~a I wr ~_I ~++r .q s.p w w. _ 6e
]t7- - - 1, ,z7~ !6~ :w . ~ -
lGW -
icoi m sm w _31M 461 at x~ ~n a~ a~ ~ in
3u - su 30
2008 Nsw StructunsNnMs Psrtnitted
w
.o -
30
30
~o
F.o j u. AV .PY aar noo Mi oa w. o.e j
r~. a..rytrft te ti 46 aT 38 ~
~,LU,~y ua. > > o o e ~
wir o.+w.rdr efrawo 0 • ~ 7 _ 4 - -
Page 3 ot 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
In May 2008, building Inspedors periormed 942 inspecKions in 22 daya. This evemges 41.9
inapectbna per day The Plans Examtr►efs revkwed 100 projeds in the month o! May and thene
were 25 projeda eweitinp revbw at the end of mortth. One over-tha-couMer permit wae issued
for the month of May.
2008 BuNding Insp*ctlons
~eaa
rmo
eoo ~ _ - - - - - - -
Nk ' YM ' Fp. 1rYr' i JN lidl I A" I!P Gt v. Can
r~ se~ ti.s+r. n. w ~ n~ • ~ 1 i - ~
v~
oamr~.v.s,~.' v ~ +~a i~w- ~-1m ar m i am
The roported velue of constrUCtion, includina nwi structurec and 2ddit~ons!altaraticn is shovm ir,
the following chatt, wmparinc _ - : . _ -
$7,420,681.00.
2008 Valuation oi Constructlon
~
I 55a,ooo,oM
' s+5.ooo,oM
s.a.ooa,ooo
M,ooo,ooo I
~ . znoe van,omw,
s3o,ooo,aoa
ssa,ooo,aoc s 2007 vahu.6m
szo.ooo.ooo - ~1- i 2ooevaiu.W
Vs,ooo,ooo
s,o ooo,ooo
~ooo.OO'D
~ , . .
.Ion Feb IuYr M Mit7l ,kx+s JtdY IWG W OCi NOV Det
Building revenues for the month of May were $78,035. Thls Is a 58°r6 decmase hom 2007.
2008 8uilding Revenues
aoaooo - - -
i uea,ooo _
s~naooa ~ 0 200E pe+erxies
ttsa.eo,~ mL-- 2067 RenerrAs
tfao aa~ ZOO6 RA+erwes
3G •
,Yn fA W AA► Uri Jn ,ly Au0 Sepl Otl ftv Dec
Pege 4 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
CODE COMPUANCE:
The number of 'Vfofations Reportad' on the following chart reflects ecWal Spokane Valley Zontng
Code vioiaticna, pius aomVleinta roceived which wero not violeUona. The oomplafncs reaeNred are
added to tfie tatat because they refled time officers apent in the ffeld conducting IrnaskiQatlona.
In addkion, tfte 'Irnestigetsd' and 'Pand(r►g' columns eccurstaly rofbct Ccde Campifance'e
current ability to proceas end irnrest3gate baddog csaes.
The idlowing chart provides e mortthly campartaon of the types of Spokane Velley Code
violetior►a ropoRed. V'rotatforts are reportad baaed on the primary complaird rocetveG, rsther than
the number of additiona{ violetiorta idenffied on arry indivlduel promises. The invesb9atiw of a
comptaint of Junk vehicies, fw example, mlght alao resuR in ideMdication of eddkional violatfons
such as the eccumuWdan of traah or harborine of livestodc These are nd Mduded in the
summary. A totel of 82 new complaints were processed In Mey.
Code Canplienca Fllss 20011
- -
140
12t~ : - - - - - -
10c~ - - - - -
ec~ - - - -
6c ~ - - - - - 4~r
4,
2C ttray- sLn- t,;,y; Sep- ruv Le:• .1ar~ Fet- n,tar npr ~
1 07 07 •kf-07~ 07 ~ 07 07 O7 07 CE I Da ~ OE Ob OB
i i■ vw.uom Fbpon.a eo as »~m ~n ee X 21 ss 11e rM n ez ~
• Mdkrr~nb 48 61 aT 42 56 24 9S 18 i67 0 EE 44 ~
~ a w. Tiani.m o~ e j i z ~ 0 2 > > > 1 o 1'
8 wrm*v Ra n N ~ 43 - ee eo n a eo 66 sa 64 '
The Spokene Valky Police Depettment, in conjundlon with SCOPE, has requested the
assistance a1 Code Compltance in identiiying Junk vehiclea abendoned wdhin the right-d-way.
SCOPE valunteera tag the vehicies. Vehidea wfiich heva not been moved by the following FrEday
are towed
Page 5 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
AciivEty is consolidated into the fallowing six categones: Environmental (acwer/sepRk, crit)cal
areas, animal end nuisance violations); Praperty (Right of Wey, property use, dangerous build-ing,
landlordltenent, fliegal businesa and signafle vblations); Junk Auto - Solld Waste (sdid weste,
filegal dumping, and househoid weate violebons); and Clearvlew Triangie end Compleint
2008 Cod* Vbiatbns by Cabgory
180 ~i
140
I 120 - -
1G^ - - -
gG - - - - ,
I 60
an
I 0 Jwn-oe Feo-oe mm-ca A;v-ae ~-a I a,.,e ~ uae ,.Aup.ae sw-oe oa-oe r~v-oe i oec-ae
}
~ sde v~s+~ ~ ~ ie j ~ ~ -
,I.sgm 37 ' o I -
~ j■ aop«,y ~ ~a za ' .a zo ~
■JunkAUeo J f0 18 ?I Y
i■ FsyytornwrNl 1 Z 1 3 4
•(brrpidrt •►Li y1olMkn b ( f i 11 ~ T A
- - - -t- . t~ - i .
I!R-.- 7 r
. • . .
Paae 6 af 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
DEYELOPIMENT ENQINEER/NG;
The DevelopmeM Engineera prooesaed 46 fdea in May. The significant fiks ere 7 canmercial
applkaUona, including a Chudc E. Cheese roataurant, a Roaauers sddtdon, e new autc datail
ahop snd shvw room for Gluallty Auto Trim and another addiNon icx AR Toola. FiReen
commerciel pro-appikabon fllrs were reviewed includinp a 102 room habel for Cortttort Suites, a
one-stay oommerdel bufkliny for Veradate Pleze, e new bank building for Unlted Haelth SeMce
Credit Unlon, nina lend use pre-apps, one subdivision, and seven ehort subdiviaior►a.
owNapnw~e ~ wat Y~►~
10o7c ` -
lO% -
- ~
idX i %
70%
10~
IML
,lul-0 AaW M►47 Oet47 Ibvv Oa-07 in.i1 IirbM Wr-0 Ap4l At
■ BlndinD Slte Plan ■ Boundrry Lfne Ac;ustment D Chanpe of llse
■ Commerslsl s CortrneRlat PrN►pps • CondRkond Use PertnR i
■ Flns! Su6d'Msfon ■ land Use Prs~App • Rezax
■ Short SLibdKWon o Strset Vacatfon
~
Page 7 of 8
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
MAY 2008, MONTHLY REPORT
CUSTOMER SERVICE:
Ptannlng
The plsnning staft assisted 292 walk-in customers at the counter and handled 246 customers'
inqufres by phone - i , -
Buliding Pennits
Thefotlawlny tab:,. ~u- ,~r..:_.: - : r~ • . . c- _ - ~ . ~ .
in the PLUS sysiem, fT1685UfG+d 'r'' _ ;~'l ~ 'j-~, rrF :ii'i;i'.=.. _ ;-r.'•; ' C, i •_,i~
to the time that e petmit 1s issue
Commerc.lal Timefiame Surr,m aty
Submittal to lsswnce
-May-08 -i'
-
t;~
v8iue C3
a~ Q ~ x ~i
NEW CONSTRUCTION ~
Industnal Buildin
StruCture 2 $1866587 181 101 22:, ~I
REMODEL
Hospnalllnstitution t s50,0oo w 64 E".
Mercantile 3 t»s.ooo 42 22 e= I
Office/F'rofessional
UPCOM/N[3 DA7ES OFINTEREST:
DATE 1NTEREST
June 20 Scott Kuhta will be a speaker at the Chamber breakfas;
June 24 First reading of Comprehensive Plan Amendments
July 8 Second read'mg of Comprehenslve Plan Amendments
Juty 22 Council presentation by staTf on Coilahorative Planniny
July 29 Presentation to the City Council regarding and Plenning Commissiot,
reaarding Urban Growth Boundaries by Susan Winchell and Bill Grimes
Page 8 of 8
-MEMo .
i'
TO: Dave Mercier, City Manager
FI70M: Rick V1nLeuven, Chief of Police
nATF: June 16, 2008
RF,: Monthly Report Msy 2008 .
Mav, 200$• ivlavt 2007:
CAD incidents: 5,436 CAD incidents: 4,565
Reports tal:en: 1,649, Rcports taken: 1,474
Traffic stnps: 1,818 TrafFic stops: 1,544
Traffic reports: 338 Traffic reports: 321
CF117 incidents inclieate ealls for service as well as sElf-initiateci officer eontaets. You ~Nill notice
that for May, 2008, CAD incidcnts reached an all-time high in the Spokane Valley. Hot spot maps
are altached shoNtiingMay residential biirglaries, May cdmmercial burgylaries, May traffic collision
.hot spots ancl May vehicle prowling hot spots; along with April and May stolen vehicle hot spots.
Also attachecl are comparison charts showing property crimes in the Spokane Valley, Spokane
Vallev calls atid stolen vehicles for the years 2003 th.raugh May, 2008.
~ ADM1N1S"1"RATIVF: ♦ Chief VanLeuven and Sheriff Knezovich participated in a Special OI}mpics fundraiser at
the ICrispy hremes in the Spokane Valley. They also served as "pacieake flippers" at thc
annua] law cnforcement breahfast sponsored by the YWCA and Spokane Regional
Uomestic Violence Team; where Spokane Valley Officer Jack Rosenthal was among law
enforcement officErs recoanized f-or special service. IIonorees were choseii because kheir
professionalism and compassion has had a positive and lasting impact on the livcs of those
%vho have been tragically affectcd by violence in their homes.
♦ Chief VaiiLeuven facilitated a uiufied couunand table top exercise ('f'M vvith thc
caoperation of the Spokane Valley 1'olice llepartmen[, Spokane County SheriC('s Office,
Spokane Valley Fire Departmetit, Spokane Fire District Wasluno on Stale Patrol and
I7eparmient Ut' Emergcncy Ivlanaaement ta tesl and evaluate the newly-adopteci Spokane
County Evacuation 1'lan. Tbe TTX was completed on *,May 13. The exe•reise effcctively
demonstraied that the T'vacuatian Plan is workable and well-written, with minor
modifcations recommended.
♦ Along v6th other commtuuty leaders, Chief VanLeuven attended a Driver Awareness aiid
Safety Education Training Program open house at the SCSO Trainulg Center. This
program is new in Spokane County and has received vcry positive reviews from the
attendino participar►ts while successfully promoting driving safety.
1... .J ♦ Consultant Leonard Matarese of ICNtA (International City/County Management
1'age 1
Associatic>n) recently visited Spokaiie Valley to begin a review Anci evaluatioci of police .
services of the Spol:ane Valley Folice Departmenl. '
;
♦ Chief VanLeuven joincd nthcr cammunity representatives at the anmial All Cicy
CivicJUlilitary Luncheon in honoritig Military personncl and to acknowledge the
community support provided by various arca Service Clubs. Qn display at the luncheon
was the beauiiful and priceless Spokane Naval Trophy.
♦ During the month of May, Chief VanLeuven was "on call" for a tntal of 14 ni~elve-hour
shifts for patrol lieutcnanis. •
COiMMiJNIT1' UI2IT.N'I'EP PULICING:
♦ The annual Law Enforc.ement brea.kfast; hosted by the Spokane County SheriCPs
Chaplauicy program, was hcld in May to demonstrate comniunit), appreciaticm for law
enforcenient ofticers throughout the area. Dr. Bobby Smith, a retired Louisiana Statc
'I'rooper, motivational speal:er and author af a law enforcement handbook iitled "Will tca
Surtirive", was the key spcaker at the event. Numerous offie.ers and staff from the SVT'D
attended the breakfast.
♦ Fcarty-five abandoned vehicles were tagged for impoundment in the Spokane Valley by
SCdPE volunteers; with 16 of die vehicles evcntually towed asicl 16 citations issued.
Thirty-four vehicle hulks were also processed in ivTay. -
♦ SGOPE Lncident Response Team (SIR"I) contribtiteci a total of 98 on-scene volunteer hours
(including trav-el time) in May in the Spokane Valley. SIRT resphnded to scven incidents
in the City of Spokane Valley; inelucling mntor veluc:le acciclents and fires.
♦ SCOPE volunceers who monitor disablcd parking infractions in the Spokane Valley issued
3$ infractinns, Along witli 72 Nvfu•nings, in the month af May. Hight volunteers conlributed
272.5 hours.
♦'1"he month of May was busy for Spokane Valley SCOPE members. University SCOPE
parlicipated in the South Pines Elementary Carnival, and Edgecliff SCOPE parCicipateci in
the Junior Lilac .Parade. SCOPE voluntccrs controllecl traffic f'or the Lilac .Parade, and also
p-articipated in the SR27 Traf6c Sarety Project event at Albertson's on 32"d AvenuE and
the Eclgecliff Neighborhood Center open housc. Twelve new SCOPL members attEnded
Basic/COP iraining. Volunteers were involved in the table top exercise testing the
Spokane County Evacuation Plan. They provided Opcration Family 1D and traff:ic control
at Evergreen hountain Retirement. (This commwuty open house al Evergreen Fountain
Retirement was also attended by Chief VanIleuven.)
OPERATIOYS:
♦ After safety concerns expressed by Spokane Valley police aiid Public Works personnel, the Spokane Valley Cit}° Council made a ciecision to reduce the speecl limit on Mirabeait
Parkway in Spokane Valley from 35 to 25 mph ui a Section near tNvp crosSwalks that cros5 .
Page 2
~ the Parkway. Spokane Valley Police are conducting emPhases alone this area io help
~ ensurc the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists.
♦ Lt. Steve Jones and 'I'ech. Asst. Josephine Duncan were P-uESts at the monthly meeting and
luncheon of the Washington Btirglar anci Fire Alann Association. They sliRred iiiformation
rcgarciing the alarm ordinances of the Spokanc Valley Police Departmcnt and Spokane
County Sheriff s Otfice and also heard thc concerns oFinembers of thc Assoeiation.
♦ Vtembers of the Spokane Valley Police I raffic Unit, aleng Nti4th Cluef VanLeuven and i.,t.
Steve Jones, joined others at the launch of SR27 Traffc Safety Projcct. This is a jainc
project *of the Washing[an State Department of Transportation, the Washington ?raffic
Safety CoIIUnission and representative_s from engineering, enforcemcnt and educatidn
agencies as well as inc;al citizens. The project's goal is to reducc the number nf fatalities,
serious injuries and collisions on the roadway. Locally, the project is coord'uiatcd throueh
the Spc>kane County Traffic SaFety Commission. The "launeh site" of the project was the
parl:ing lot of the Albertson's storc on 32"d Avenue. The SR Comiclor evnsists of
approximacely 20 nules from Rockford to Trent Avenuc in the City of Spokane Valley.
The Washuigton State Patrol, Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Spokane Valley
Police Dcpartment will conduct inereased patrols in tlus area for the ncxt several months.
♦ Assault Turns Theft inta Rohbery
A Spokane Valley elcctric.al employee uiterruptcd avehicle prowluig and was attacked by
one of the t,.vo suspe.cts. After hearing a noise he•hind the business while culting a length
~ of pipe; he walked outside and observed cwo suspects breaking into his truek. They liad
already removed lus GPS navigation system and a camera. He confronted the men and orie
picked up a long length of 2x41umber mid swutg it at the victim, who was able to partially
dEflcct the blow -v7th a length of pipe he had just fiuished cutting and was sti]l carr}rui;.
'I"his case is still under investigation.
o Pizza Employee and C+'riends Arrested After Robbery Attempt
A Spokane Valley pizza cmployee halched a robbery plan vvith his tluee buddies aftcr
learning he was ;oins to be fired. The three friends cntered the Pizza Hut establishment on
South Pines with their faces covered with ski masks. They i.tnplied thst they were ai-med
and lcft the business with the safe and till tray. The employee and an L►ninvolved second
employcc were left inside, aaid the Employee reported the robbery to 9-1-1. However, he
made a rnistdke af giving super-detailed desciiptions of the robbers and thei.r vehicle,
makuip- the responding Spokane Valley Police officecs suspicious of his possible
involvement. rlfter further investi;ztion, officers recovered the safc, thc iill drawer and all
the stolen cash. Three of the four friends, all 18 years old, werc cventually arrested and
booked into thc Spokane County Jzil on felony counts of Second 17egree Robbery and Sccond Degree l3uralary, and their 15-year-old accomplicc was baoked uito juvenilc
detention on the same charges.
♦ Robber-y Occurs in Hotel Parking Lot
A man and wnnlan froni Grand F'orks, B.C. who travEled to the Spokane Valley on a
~ shopping trip were robbed at giulpoint in the parkuig lot of a hotel in the vicinity of the
Spokane Valley Mall. At about 12:11 a.m., tiie riwo were walking across the hotcl parking
lot whEn riwo black males in a dark blue Mitsubishi with dark tinted windows stopped thEie
Page 3 •
vehicle next to the couple and demanded money, pointing a pistol at them. The male
victim took his wallet from his pocket, removed money from it ancl handed the money to ;
the suspects, who immediatcly cirnve away. The iwo suspects have not been identi fied. ♦ Two Yersons Stabbed during iVlulti-pa rticipant Altercation
A fight at an apartment complex in the 2800 block of Nprih Cherry residtcd in two persons
beina stabbed, one in the leg and the other with scrious injLu-ies to his back from four stab
Nvounds. The inciclent began in the carly morning hours on May 31 when agi•oup of mAles
outside of aii aparl:mEnt were approached by another apartment resident, asking lhat tlley
keep the noisc doNvm. When one ot the males took offense, the situation escqlated to a fiizht
with multiple, participanLs and endina with the stabbuig of the two victims. Police
respondcd and investigated, and a 21-year-old male was arrested and cliarged with Assault
1" Degree.
Panhandlin;:
♦ On May 5, OCficer James Ebel was dispatchcd to the arca of Tnterstate 90 and Sullivan for
a theft report, where the unidentified complainaalt had advised 9- I-1 that two paciliandlers
at this location stolc fond out of the baelc of his truek wlule lie was stoppecl at the reci
traff e light. 'f he complainant did not wish to make a report or press charges but Wanted
law enforcement to contact and identify the suspects. 7`he officer did contacc the riwo
suspects, who deniecl the tlle.ft allegations. Whcn queslioned about why they were in the
Spokane Vallcy every ciay, the male replied, "We don't get tickets in the Spol:ane Vallcy
like in the Spokanc City."
On three or fouz other suni.lar incidcnts, cnmplainants have not wanteci to press charees
aglinst panhandlers. '1'his makes it difficult 1'or law enfarccment ta cieal with thesc
situations.
♦ On May 14, Officer Ebel was notified of a large tent that was visible fron1 the
complainant's back deck. Hc investigaied asid located the tent just tinder the Pines Water
Tower, where he found what appeared to bE a dump sitc. The tent was cmpty but appeared
tp have been recenfly used, and thEre was clothuna and old panhancller sie.ns i.n the vicinity.
T-te took the tent doNNql and left a note for whomever it belonged to, directing thern not to
retLu-n as this was on private properiy.
♦ On May 15, Of[icer Ebel and Officer Bratton respnncled to a"dueat" call at Wal-Mart on
Sullivan. They cUntacted several transient males who had a c•amp sct up in an enclosed
dumpster aeea near Payless Shoes. "1'he transients were arp-uing about how tnuch limc the
others hacl bceu ta,king on the cornEr. The officers learned that appare.ntly there is an
unwrittcn rule that no one "sign flyer" can be on the Wal-Marrt corncr for inore than 30
nunutes at a tune. This investigation did not substantiate probable cause for any arrest.
Officer Ebel notcd that transicnts in tli_is arca appear to be grovvi.ng morc aggressive as time
goes on.
(NO 1 C: At a Jw1e meeting of the Panhandling Committee; the above information was presented .
to committee members by Chief VanLeuven, Corporal viark Ny;ren and Officer James Lbel. '
They also discussed criminal justice issucs dealing with panhandlers.)
Paee 4
2008 MAY CRIME REPORT
May-08 May-07 08 to dats 07 to date 07 Tobl 06 Total 05 Total 04 Total
BURGU4RY 58 4111 284 219 584 714 744 997
FORGERY 34 3911 161 182 365 334 464 465
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 64 10811 328 525 1.265 1,122 944 1.224
NON-CRIMINAL 86 7611 403 329 839 811 749 916
PROPERTY OTHER 75 72 340 375 890 982 1.154 1.665
RECOVERED VEhIICIES 33 17 137 148 343 403 333 390
STOLEN VEHICLES 55 25 223 218 478 711 603 577
THEFT 165 175 734 783 1,881 1,888 2.256 2,853
UIOBC 0 1 1 4 8 11 8 10
VEHICl.E OTHER 0 0 1 1 3 3 5 40
VEHICLE PROWLING 126 5611 538 302 682 937 958 1.382
70TAL PROPERTY CRlMES 696 610 3,150 3,088 7,338 7,916 8,178 10,519
ASSAULT 106 9111 395 352 853 846 894 880
DOA/SUICIDE 18 23 105 98 221 167 159 164
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 92 86 438 361 874 736 762 755
NOMICIDE 1 0 1 0 1 5 1 5
KIDNAP 1 1 10 7 23 22 35 24
MENTAL 38 35 156 146 350 425 425 386
MP 9 511 35 24 83 68 97 106
PER50NS OTHER 127 11311 556 539 1,337 1,159 1,256 1.624
ROBBERY 10 5 32 25 60 58 56 58
TELEAHONE HARA55MENT 4 b 27 40 73 83 92 190
TOFAL MAJOR CRIMES 406 368 1.755 1,592 3,875 3,589 3,777 4,192
AOULT RAPE 2 3 22 17 43 29 39 37
CHILD ABUSE 17 13 77 55 104 78 101 126
CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 9 7 27 31 92 105 88 205
SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 2 1 4 3 6 4
INDECENT L16ERTIES 2 2 8 10 18 15 9 21
CHILD MOLESTATiON 7 8 25 19 46 69 87 77
CHILD RAPE 5 5 19 11 31 62 35 30
RUNAWAY 41 30 161 138 295 309 311 437
SEX OTHER 14 20 94 86 194 203 181 162
STALKING 3 2 12 7 17 17 27 35
SUSPICIOUS PERSON 13 15 58 81 152 177 244 341
TOTAL SEX CR/MES 113 105 503 436 996 1,067 1,108 1.475
DRUG 96 70 411 368 807 675 891 999
ISU OTHER 0 0 0 1 1 Q 0 1
TOTAL ISU 96 70 411 369 808 665 881 1,000
TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 338 329 1,671 1,544 3,800 3,345 2,403 2776
TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,649 1.474 7,490 7,027 16,817 16,582 16,357 19,962
7
Sans n t
_ ✓ , - f ~ ~ ~ ~ LR. ~
~ csq~ 8 N WQ Y ~ ° -
~ ~~~r~'~A~ -jU -4 9
m ~
o
- a ' r_ c a z Euc+ld
k~ 9 y
~D~ ~t~3 ~ ~f _ _ , ' _ ~ ~nbctn~ ~ ' E~~ ~ - " ~ Auck e r
~ ~ . ✓ _ ~ M ~~j,~^--'~-'-' i , ~ r
ick
~ 1 d
~inftm ~ I.;.<_ ~r! ~f
~~~Z
lon i t ~0u~_, r~ln~ r~ .
~
ission, MlssEOn o
BOO • O~~
' sharp
~A
n rd _ , , ~ r$t1t, ~ ~
11tt+~
~T_rN
1;---rl~:c
i19lh
r--~ - r..•;,~' I-.~
- It _ r ' ~ ~ < ~ ~ j ~j - ~ _ I ' + b1~y • _ ,`r 1
~ i~ • i E~Lti. - ~ ~ ~1
~1215t• - ~ Jer-t~►n ~P~ ~ ~ _ f. ~~~~d' a I~ ~C ~o,q~ _ 32^d
~ 26fh
lrr'
o ~
31 et T z U~
a rn 10 40t ~ Belb Te 5 ~ Vehkle
_ - r 37
- o • 1~ ~ ~ aam Prow1Mg
~
c -7,~ ~
~ ~ • a ~ ~~a -~i ~ ~ Low
=Medium
4
: ~ •~~ire ~~o Ckp'P~-t , J n°~aBat MH h
i9
"
2008 Ma ~ Vehicle Prowling HotsPots ~
•~"r• °
~ ~
~ ~ br ' J fak~ 1~ ~
$8n
~
2 x . sIE
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 m u~r ( 1; ! wa Y ; s ~I iw
~ q u~""
i ~ ~-4
EucwC -L
E d - -
erlCk M
y
~k- 2 Indin
Idl
Ut - YI
55 . Ion LO661Qfl Boo -
GhatP
~ r
~
Alk T-
c 4 ~
l40h
j ~ -
' cn . ~ r ` ~ 1th ~ tll r
T.k
- f'T.1 i
~ ~
21st ,bnn 32nd `
~ 251h ~ ~ • ` ~t; ~ _ ~1 ~ \ r
( t
~ Z 31at ~N
$ 40 Betia T°
_ „ ~ 910 Trarrk
~ Colllsbn
a 44m o
~
44m
2
=Low
m~I~@dIURI
i
,Y . i ` 7 I ,~-~t °rr►a~ ~ttic ~rNorw~+ I~` Q =Hlgh
D n' 2008 May Traffic Collision Hotspots ~11June2008~ ~
_ r
~ .6-
7 Juse Sonsrie
n
~ c~ Q l a w y• a .-'~ic-$1~
-Ju .e 9 9 i e
.n-L , - ~ „ ~ g
- - G~• c Eudld
_i 0
~ ~L
tRhe ~ Eu e--_
' - ~ -.~,r~•, --t..
ryt
Man. t,;,~
ryt -
~ u j ~ ti _ ~ Kr~ox fndkirtn i
1.'~~- d g ~-r~~-o--- -r- 2 ~ ~ _ J , -
i _ . t~~ QO ♦ - - k .
~
~1 Ca a -
415liOR $(H)
Shn , r- ' I c ~
d 8
` ot 4 ^ ~ r
. I C)
~t~41 iC - _ - ~ - - - ~T _ I ~ _f f 1 • - Y ~ F-
, tn
~°j~ I . . i \ ~ -
~ ~em ~ ~`-T ~
' ~ • 1~ ~ 1` L°~-;r' - _ ~r 'l1ry -kl~'
- 21 st
JOnn~ 32ed
21 `
25th
~ ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ I
~
31 d
40 Beib Ta ~
w~ m 10 3 1 COmrtterCtel
N Bure~ry
- 37
3
~ g ~ ~ ~ • ~ e~ ..°i
' Q 3 1~ P- - th
4S a q,4th
§ r
Low
3 I = Nbedium
~
n ~
y = High
J a
N
2008 MaY Commercial Burg~ la ~ HotsPots 1~p une~20 8- ~
~ ; M`'
~
1 1,~ ~ { i~.1+.~.1
f 7
rzs ~
sn ~
~Co' `°a} , > i 1
a, W8 Y ~
~ r \ • - ~
m
U, ~
7
~ , G\ C 8 z E u c M d
E . id ~ ~ ~ ~ fl-~- a _
~ ,+.,t..,Lr • , t~ I~, ~ - ~ "~.,Ij~ ~ -
(ta
`rox
Tn
; r
190
.1 ,:1 ~ r , . r, . ` ' C,
BSIM~ 4 ~ MI_-.
O
o•
~
1
- - $ _
OM St1a1P tA ^
i~ •
'7!1 _-'A C1 Q
r1~?11T~ 7 r,i;n _ Zt~ ~ e ►d i 8 ~ e
ti,'=i Ir p v3rd
th 1 I
lh ~ . -
al
d x
icnn r--,l` 32nd
Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ II • ~
a ' ~ ~ `►r ti~~9~ 1~ ~ ~
~ 31 s1 ~ tC
Belfe 3
10 -f Rgsb811UAl
_ 37 ~M ~ Burglary
n1G A
y i4fh
~ ~ n •8..fc, ~ ~ LOW
9 mlihedium
/ rn °~k~t `o ~Mo~e $ I ~ ~ ~Hlgh
~ °5 1 2008 Mav Rcsidential Burglary Hotspots M ~
~ V
7
Jose i~ 6enlsoo r ~
~cfi 7
=
cn ~ Welle ey
N w 6 ~ 7
u "°t 9
, S m I
c Esockd ~
r ~ irabe ipw E d 4~' + g~ e ~
~
_r.f= k rn~~+~►~~
.
ir, - i i~-• ~ , ~ . -
~1~--
_ r
- - us ~ - ~ . - .-1',~;kwet , , _
!
MFsek►n
Mlsslm ( i . !il 2
$ ng SharP I ~~c
~
~ - - _ ~
~
ANA 1•- '
. .
-~•w=' - fi~i ~ _S -~3~ ; ~ - ~ _ T
~l - , lc i:;t ir • ` - tl, ~i ~ ~ ~ m ~d ' - - 8 ..1$tlr' ~
:cl
, . ~
tG 771 fTh
LIA
~L
2
5~-~y~yrL; 1 ~ c ~i•7°-~~ - I ,~`~p t~~~.;h r ~6[~-- .r - a ry~ 15!
o r r ~ ~ 1 t 18th
14
4 ~
r
~ ~ l l~ --'~=1--~ t~. - ` - ►M',y'a}
21 sc \qe5 : .t ,1 - u~ ~••~2 ~ ~ ~ ~r = _ -
Jenn b~ a 32na
251h tiTT
2 bo
Y ( i
3161 30
~ ~ ~ n, ~ 1ll m Selie Te 5 ~ a ~ StOlef1
~ x
_ .a~ s um Vehfcies
' e4u, to 4 th p
° = Low
n 13
=Medium
9 bcf'e'oar ~ `MOM'4c~-_~?~ 111111111High
'
2008 APril & May Stolen Vehicle Hotspots 11pJune 2~ ~
~
Spokane Valley Calls
aooo
3500 •
I
F/
3000 -
~
2500 f ~ 2003
-0-2004
~02005
2000 ~ - -0*-2006
' 2007
--0-20Q8 ,
1500 •
1000
500
~
0• -
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEG
Spokane Valiey Property Crimes
800
-
- ~
740 -
640 - - -
r
sao - - - - - ^ f -*-2063
-6-- 2404
~ - ~-mir-2005
- - - - - - - - -W-2006 ~
400 - - - -
1---i;- 2007
/
! I-O-2008 ~
~ - - - - - - - -
300 - - - - - - - -
200-
100
0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
Spokane Valley Stolsn Vehicies
90
aa
,
, - - -
70
so - 2003
1~ -f- 2004 ~
50 --6-2005
--*-2006
40 , - -E?--2007
-*-2008 1
30 - -
7.0 - ~ -
~
10
I
,
p
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
S]06rane
Vall.ey.
11707 E Sprague Ave Sufte 106 * Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ ci[yhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Dave Mercier, City Manager, Mike Jackson, Dep. City PJlanager
From: Ken Thompson, Finance Director
Date: June 18, 2008
Re: May Report
May tughliglits in Finance included:
(D Mav financial reports
Reports sho,,«ng a comparison of revenue•5 and expenditures, to the 200$ }3udget; are attached.
Gambling tax receipts for 200$ are expected /o be less thaii budgeted. We havc three signi ficant
accounts that have fa11En behuid. We will continuc to monitor these accounts but full callection
is unlikely. Our budgct projections for 2008 gambling tax receipts was reduced and will be
reducEd agaul for 2009.
Sales tax receipts are slightly below (3%) our projections t'nr 200$.
Fxpenses Por the year are running less than budget which partially offsets thc lo~~~er sales and
gambling tax receipt projections.
The investment re.port is attached for your review.
Potential street Pund revenue sources
We arE lookinD at several potential street fund revenue strcams identified by the council
at a recent council meetinD. Those with tY►e most potential appear to bE a velucle tab fee, a utility
tax on telep}aones and agreeinents with solid waste companies to reimburse thc city for wear on
~
~
our streets.
2008 budp-et amendment
"1'liese amendiiients wcre adaptcd by lhe council in May.
2009 budget preparation
Buclgct preparation usua11y starls in April of cach year for the coming year. This ycar will be
more challenging as our employees that have haiidleci this task in prior years, are no longer with
uS.
"1'he first af several public hearings on the 2009 budget is scliedulecl for July 22.
Annual financial reUOrt - 2007
Staff has started this work and cxpects thc arrival of the scate auditor's office around the first oF .
August. This is extrcrnely timc cOnsLuning .f.or all members of the Finance iaivision. _
Move to east side of biiildin~
"1°his move was completed in Mzy. Htunan Resoluces will occupy the suite made availcibJe by
ttvs move.
~
City of Spokane Valley
General Fund
Budget Variance Report
For the Period Ended May 31, 2008
Unaudited
Amended
Budget Niay YTD Unrealized Percent
2008 R venues Revenues Revenue Realfzed
General Fund Revenues:
Unreserved Fund Balance (est) $ 5,000,040 $ - $ 9,000,0,00 S(4,000,000) 180.00°k 8
Property Tax 10,496,500 3,843,916 4,457,633 6,038,867 42.47% 11
Sales Tax 19,165,800 1,609,425 6,214,889 12,850,911 32.43%
Gambling Tax 720,000 125,677 267,192 452,808 37.11 °.6 2
Franchise Fees/Business Licenses 853,450 5,856 260,739 592,711 30.55°k 1
Stale Shared Revenues 1,170,550 141 395,132 775,418 33.76°,U 1
Planning & Building Fees 2,282,000 97,815 898,939 1,383,081 39.39%
Fines and Forfeitures 1,300,000 150,780 624,795 675,205 48.06%
Recreation Prograrn Fees 507,Oa0 48,957 322,765 184,235 63.66%
Investment Interesi • 414,100 43,810 176,735 237,365 42.68`Yo
Oparating Transfers 165,000 - - 165,000 0.D0% 3
Total Genoral Fund Revenues: S 42,074,400 $ 5,926,377 S 22,618,819 $ 19,455,581 53.76%
0 Amended
Budget May YTD Unrealized Percent
2008 fap ndi ures Exflendiiures Exoenditures ealized
General Fund Expenditures:
Leaislative Brancii 319,991 12,229 123,613 196,378 38.63°k 4
Executive & Legislative Support 997,076 66,149 367,311 629,765 36.84°,6
Public Safely 19,297,300 1,364,334 5,665,322 13,631,978 29•36%
Operalions & Administrative Svcs 1,655,707 93,689 461,385 1,134,322 27•87%
Public Wortcs 1,106,437 67,214 321,808 784,631 29.06`Yo
Planning & Gommunity Dev. 3,563,139 266,152 1,288,743 2,274,396 36.17%
Library Service5 20,000 - - 20,000 O.QOrya 7
Patks 8 Reueation 2,644,420 140,339 599,959 2,044,461 22.699'0
General Govemment 3,417,988 74,450 812,377 2,605.611 23.77°h
Total General Fund Expenditures: $ 33,0229058 $ 2,086,556 $ 9,640,576 $ 23,381,642 29.18%
~
811812068 11:56 AM
City of Spokane Valley
Other Funds - ~
Budget Variance Report
For the Period Ended May 31, 2008
Unaudited
Amended
Budget fViay Y'I`D Unrealized Peroe.nt
2008 eve es Revenves Reven Re Iaized
O[hor Funds Revenues:
Street FuntJ $ 5,922,972 $ 173,430 $ 672,285 S 5,254,687 11.3596 13
Arterial Streei Fund 850,000 1,522 8,135 841,665 0.96% 15
Trails 0nd Paths 30,000 84 452 29,548 1.5196 6
HotelliNolel Fund 668,000 41,264 125,759 542,241 18.83%
Civtc Facilities Replacement 397,000 762 3,970 393,030 1.00%9
Debt Serviae - LTGO 03 660,000 44,676 44,676 555,324 7.45%
Capital Projecis Fund 4,420,000 72,898 330,171 4,089,829 7.47% 5
Special Capftal ProJects Fund 4,420,004 74,009 334,502 4,085,498 7.57g6 5
Street Capitai Projects 7,354,023 416,335 46,475 7,307,548 0.63gb 5
A4irabeau Point Project 454,000 694 3,616 450,384 0.8096 6
Street Bond Capital Projects - • ' ' 0,01)%
C4mmunity Developrrd 61oc9c Gmts 245,000 - - 245,000 0.009U 15
Capitdl Grants Fund 11,347,000 166,426 26,925 11,320,075 0.2496 5
Berker 9ridge Reconstruction 5,862,800 208,587 12,2114 5,854,586 0.2196 5
Stormvrater Mgmi Fund 3,160,000 656,685 779,256 2,380,744 24.6696 13
Equip. Renial & Replacement 780,000 1,598 8,392 771,608 1.08% 13
RtskManagemenl 217,100 28 188139 28,961 86.669612
Reserves•+
Centerplace OperaUng 335,000 643 3,371 331,629 1.01%9
Servlce Level Stabpizalion 5,400,000 9,952 51,871 5,348,129 0.9696 9
WinterWeather 560,000 1,066 5,554 554,446 0.99%9 ,
Parks Capital 4,260.000 1,756 9,156 4,250,844 0.2596 9
C(vic Bulldings 5,085,OU0 10,837 56,753 5,028,247 1,1296 9
Total Other Funds Revenuos: S 62 367.895 5 1.901.212 S 2.711 6Z2 1 5L&.~2$ 4,UI
Amended
Budget hdey YTD Unrealized Percent
2008 E ae~c ndiiures EApenditures Expendliure~ Rea'7 d
Other Funds Expenditures:
SJeet Fund S 4,242,304 S 339,844 S 1,625,082 $ 2,417,242 43.024b 13
Arter9al Street Fund 850,000 - - 850,000 0.004ti 15
7ralf> and Paths 30,000 - - 30,000 0.06°/5-6
htotellP.4otel Fund 668,000 27,432 110,793 557,201 16.59°,5
Civic Faalities Replaoement 397,040 - - 397,004 0.00'k 8
17aht Service LTGO 03 600,000 203,436 203,436 386,564 33.91 %
Capi.al Pro}ecis Fund 4,420,000 22,338 22,338 4,397,662 0.51°5 5
Speclal Cap6tal Projects Fund 4,420,000 22,335 22,338 4,397,862 0.51;b 5
StreetCapitalPrafects 7,354,023 21,389 173,816 7,180,207 2.36% 5
Alirabeau Point Project 454,000 - - 454.000 0.00% 6
Street Bond Capital ProjeCts - - - - 0.004b
Communiry Deveioprnt Block Grnts 245,000 - - 245,400 0A0S6 15
Capital Granis Fund 11,347,000 317,453 397,461 10,949,539 3.5646 6
Barker 8rldge ReoonstrucEion 5,862,800 3,963 22,417 5,840,3$3 0.3894,
StormvraterMgm!Fund 1.983,944 298,747 459,690 1,524,254 23.17;U 13
Equip. Renial & Repl2Cemni 780,000 - - 780,000 0.00% 14
Risk Management 217 140 - 187,048 30,052 88.16% 12
Reserves•~ CenEerplace Opera!ing 335,000 - - 335,000 0.009fe 6
Service Level Stabiliz,atcan 5,400,000 - - 5,440,009 0.0096 6
1Mnter Weather 560,000 - - 560,000 0.004b
Parks Capftal 4,260,000 339,847 375,815 3,884,385 8.8256 5
Civtc Buitdings Capitel 5,085,040 10,876 68,849 5,016,159 1.3
Total Other Funds Expenditures: 5~59.5~ S 1.fi05.2_6.3 ~ 3.868.86~ bS 642,302 B 6U°o
. ,
an erooa 11:56n►.+
~ For the Month of May 2008
Total
LGIP' BB iVOoney Mkt'* BB CD Investments
Beginning S 39,869,517.00 S 1,647,151.30 $ 1,048,944.59 S 42,565,612.89
Deposits 1,826,737.41 - - 1,826,737.41
Withdrawls - -
Interest 83,614.70 2,762.36 - 86,377.06
Ending $ 41,779,869.11 $ 1,649,913.66 S 1,048,944.59 $ 44,478,727.36
Balances bv Fund
General Fund $ 14,784,701.76
Street Fund 2,719,542.66
Arterial Street 809,748.54
Paths & Traiis 23,851.98
HoteUMotel 456,448.95
CenterPLace Operating Reserve 341,936.95
Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,294,771.33
Winter Weather Reserve 566,983.88
~ Civic Facilities Replacement 405,226.80
Capital Projects 4,257,654.66
Special Capital Projects 4,941,768.11
Mirabeau Point Project 359,105.84
Parks Capital Project 934,658.89
Civic Buildings Capital Projects 5,765,708.44
Stormwater Management 2,014,549.72
Equipment Rental & Replacement 777,299.46
Risk Management 14,729.39
$ 44,478,727.36
`Local Govemment Irnestment Pool
" Banner Bank
FOOTNOTES
1 Received quarterly
2 Three accounts in arrears
3 Transfers are made quarterly
4 AWC membership paid in Jan.
5 Capital projects often take a number of years to plan, engineer, acquire right of way and
construct.
6 No projects planned in 2008
7 Small amount of OS library tax due district
8 Estimated, pending 07 review
9 Interest earnings
10 Most equipment fully funded in late 05
11 Most tax received in May and Nov.
12 Ins premium paid in Jan.
13 Beg. Bal. included which understates realized amounts and % ,
14 For replacement of vehicles 8 computers 15 For street capital projects during summer months
~
6J1812008 11.56 AhA
~po"`l~ane
000
~ ~alley~
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
May 2008
AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION
• Street Maintenance - County Street Maintenance Interlocal
*Street Sweeping - AAA started winterlspring sweeping.
• Street and Stormwater Maintenance and Repair contract -Poe Asphalt Paving Inc. worlced on winter
potholing.
• Landscaping Services - Spokane ProCare is working spring/summer 2008. Discussed multiple areas
that have swales that may be required by Home Owners Associations to maintain.
• Vactoring Contract - AAA Sweeping removed ponding water around drywells. Contract Monies are
nearly expended, working on Change Order.
• Engineering Services SuppoR - Agreements with private engineering firms.
• Street Maintenance (Pines & Trent) - WSDOT Interiocal
• Solid Waste - Regional Solid Waste Interlocal
C)ASTEWATER • Proposals have been received from two firms for the design, build and operation of the Spokane
County Regional Water Reclamation Facility. We are scheduled to make a final selection June 26,
2008.
• Ecology has reissued the TMDL for another 30 day comment period that ends on June 24`h.
Information is available at their web site at:
http://www. ecy.wa. gov/programs/wq/tmdUspokaneriverldissolved_oxygen/i ndex. html
CAPITAL PROJECTS
• Ciry Hall Project
The City Hall Program is scheduled for presentation to Council on June 24t'.
A proposed contract for City Hall site planning will be given to Council on June 24'h, July 1" and July g'n
• Valley Corridor Project
Project on hold pending outcome of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Sub Area Plan.
• Street Master Plan
JUB Engineers has completed evaluations on this year's residential streets and Principal Arterials and
is working on the update to the Street Master Plan.
0 • Broadway Ave Reconstruction - Moore to Flora (0088)
Initial project layout is complete; stormwater altematives developed; worked on right-of-way plan;
Selected Skilling's Connolly, Inc. for Real Estate Services.
• ApplewayJSprague/Dishman Mica ITS (0062)
Met with WSDOT and Spokane County to review existing facilities and assumptions for project;
WSDOT will provide design services for this project; bid date scheduled for mid August. Coordinating
with Street Preservation work on Dishman-Mica to have conduit placed before the Overlay is started at
the crossing of 8th and 16th. There will be a camera placed at Dishman-Mica and Appleway.
• Children's Universal Park (0086)
Council reviewed and approved fee proposal from Consultant. Prepare for Public Meeting in 2 months.
CONSTRUCTION
• Pines/Mansfield (0005) All right of way has been acquired and we have requested certification from WSDOT. The final project
cost estimate is now approximately $5.5M. The project is advertised for bids with construction
scheduled to begin in July 2008.
• Appleway Avenue Reconstruction - Tschirtey to Hodges (0016)
Knife River was awarded the project as the low bidder for $4,565,859.95. Construction began March
17th. Knife River completed the curbs and asphalt on the East bound lanes and moved to the North
half of the roadway. Signal work began.
• Barker Road Bridge Project (0003)
The bid opening date was May 16. Staff continues to work with utilities to relocate services.
Construction scheduled to begin in late June 2008.
• 24th Avenue Reconstruction Project (0053)
Bids opened on May 6th with construction scheduled to begin June 16, 2008. Public notices to inform
the citizens of start date will be mailed. Project signs are up.
• Broadway ! Fancher PCC Intersection (0067)
Environmental Phase, Topographical Survey and Geotechnical Report are complete. Bid Documents
and Plans are in development. Project is scheduled to Advertise for bids in June with construction
scheduled to begin in July, 2008.
• Sprague / Bowdish, PCC Intersection (0092)
Beginning environmental stage. Topographical survey and geotechnical report are complete. Bid
scheduled for July, construction in fall of 2008. Worked on Lane configuration, and preliminary cost
estimate for signals and construction.
• Broadway Ave Rehab - I-90 EB Ramps to Park Rd (0068)
Workied on MOU, sent 35% plans to water districts, they are working on their plans. Sent Prospectus
in. Worked on pole relocation with Avista.
• Signal Controller Upgrade Project (0071)
Construction funds released on April 29. Controllers were ordered (44) off state contract, should be
delivered Mid June; Spokane County and WSDOT signal maintenance crews will test, program, and
install new controllers under existing engineering services contracts.
• Sprague/Conklin Signal (0077)
Received estimate from Knife River (contractor for the Appleway Avenue Reconstruction Project). T
,
• Broadway Ave Safety Improvement - Park Rd to Pines Rd (0063)
Presented information to Council on results of accident reduction on three-lane Broadway between
Pines Rd and Sullivan Rd. Staff recommends not moving ahead with project until more accident data
can be evaluated. Council directed staff to wait for more accident data.
• Swimming Pool Upgrade Project (0073, 0074, 0075)
0
Contractor began demolition and remodel work on all three existing pool houses. The contractor
proposed to continue work on the Park Road Pool slide through the summer. The Valley Mission Park
and Terrace View Paric pool additions +,vill begin after this summer's swimming season. Worked on
partitions and paint. Poured slide for Park Road. Worked through various Change Orders. Pools are
scheduled to open on 6/15.
• Old Senior Center Demolition (0072)
Old Senior Center Demolition - Worked on the development of a bid package for asbestos removal and
demolition of existing building. Estimate is $130,000.
• Valley Mission Park Upgrade (0076)
1JVorked with Parks Dept. on the development of a schedule and plans for work to be accomplished this
year.
• Sullivan Bridge #4501 Inspection over Trent(0095)
On hold, reviewing options.
• 44t" Avenue Pathway- Woodruff Rd. to Sands Rd. (0054)
Spokane County is surveyed on 5122.
• Police Precinct-Shop Drain Installation (0096)
Worked on Scope, will solicit from the Consultant Roster.
• Barker Road Project (0004)
Project complete. Punch list complete. Closing out Projec#.
~ • Spaldings Sanitary Sewer Project (0056)
The projects design is complete. This project will bid with the White Birch Project. The bid opening is
scheduled for May 7t'.
• Trentwood Sanitary Sewer Project (0058)
The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began on July 9, 2007. The project is
approximately 80°/o complete. Project restarted March 10.
• Grandview Acres Sanitary Sewer Project (0057)
The contract was awarded to Knife River Co. Construction began June 5, 2007. The project is
approximately 80% complete. Project restarted March 10.
• RockwelllSummerfield Sanitary Sewer Project Phase I(0091)
This project bid with Summeffield. The project was awarded to Knife River. Construction began in May
2008.
0 Rockwell Sanitary Sewer Project (0094)
Taylor Engineering is designing the project. Bid opened May 14~'.
• Summerfield Sanitary Sewer Project (0084)
This project bid with Rockwell/Summerfield. Knife River was awarded the contract.
oo Sutters Sanitary Sewer Project (0082)
The project was awarded to SI Construction. Construction began on May gih
• White Birch Sanitary Sewer Project (0081)
Century West Engineering designed the project. The Bids opened on RJiay 7`h.
TRAFFIC
• Received new traffic signal LED's to continue replacing incandescent bulbs. Spokane County has
started retrofits.
• Assisted Capital Projects with design issues on Appleway, Broadway/Park, SpraguelBowdish
concrete intersection, and CMAQ grants.
• 20 New citizen requests/complaints were received via phone and email. These typically involve
traffic signals, stop sign requests, speeding complaints, bus stop concerns, streetlight outages,
requests for new streetlights, traffic count requests, and parking issues.
• Traffic Intern is working on Traffic Counts and update for our Freight and Goods Transportation .
Map.
STORMWATER
• Have done extensive research and continued planning for implementation of the NPDES Phase II
and UIC requirements. Coordinating with Spokane County and the City of Spokane to develop a
Public Outreach Program,
• Found error in UDC. Stormwater fee language had been left out. Worked with Legal to get
language back into UDC.
• HOA are protesting stormwater fees on private roads. Looking into and will be making decision
soon.
• Working in Coordination with City of Spokane and Spokane County on a Stormwater atlas.
• Intems are inventorying drywells for Underground Injection Control (UIC), they have approximately
1000 left.
• Discussed Decant Facility options.
~
STREET & STORMWATER MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY
~ i
The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for
May, 2008;
A. Poe asphalt has continued repairing asphalt concrete (Full depth patching) throughout Spokane
Valley. Grinding and overlay of Montgomery Avenue will start up soon.
B. City of Spokane Valley Maintenance Supt. has met several times with Poe Asphalt Supt, Planning
summer construction activity.
C. Cats Eye Excavating installed an additional 17 new storm water systems in various locations
throughout the Valley. Cats Eye also made various repairs to existing storm water structures.
D. AAA Sweeping has operated Brooms and water trucks daily performing the annual Spring Sweeping
Program. 15e and 2"d arterials are complete working on residential areas and will come back over 1 st
and 2"d arterials, approximately 3 weeks of work left.
E. AAA Sweeping has operated Vector for the Under Ground structure cleaning program. An estimated
6000 + under ground structures exist in the City of Spokane Valley, 145 have been completed year to
date.
F. Geiger crews have worked in the City of Spokane Valley one day per week cleaning the City of litter
and debris. Geiger activity will increase to four days per week. G. Local tree companies have completed minimal trimming of problem trees, tree removal of dead or
dying trees and overhanging limbs in the City right-of-way. This will be an ongoing maintenance
program and will continue throughout the summer.
H. Several citizen inquiries were responded to and resolved.
1. Clean out Chester Pit. A middle of summer project will be scheduled.
J. School Crosswalks with Methyl methacrylate projects are being planned.
. ,
STREET: Through the end of May private contracts invoiced $391,453, and the County invoiced
$1,210,813 for a total Street Maintenance cost of $1,602,266.
STORMWATER: The County invoiced $3,873 and pnvate contrads invoiced $436,725, for a total
Stormwater Maintenance cos# of $440,598.
STREET AND STORMWATER MAlNTENANCE COMPARISONS THROUGH MAY
stonnv..e.r wr -
gpokw. C 82.eoa,0oo
2008 i3,! 3
4 Moo.c4o
20Q7 i6.ba9
i+,eoo,ooo
tormwetss Nainbnance fOooXT JOot raaf
Ptlvstf COnttftlO+s 11.103194
i!1pp,Crr,
2008 1436,72
~ f.
2007 3C~3.002 ~ - '~~u:ane ro-y
1
apO~M CbU/1f,~
~
2M
f 1.Zi0.s1.g
2
2w7
6trkt MsinWryn"
rlvats Coatra
2009 6391.459
t
2D07 t130.438
~
7ane
O&
~wky'
Pniiect WislQn Cw+attuctbn EaUmNsd Tahl Proj~c!
• IRand Conatruetlan Prniwb F Com Cort
nnae tiarAcr Ruad tkIdpe (tepCwempM - Bart,a RcL at Spaaane RtvR BR Knuhon 100% 0% 1211N9 811,717,000
aoGS P+nea11r►amfild Proiecl-1ANbur to PinW, b t-00 11BNCMAO Knubon 100% 0'li talr0o 8 6,6I0,341
an5 Applersy Avaerie Rermslucbon - TschYfey b Hodpes BTPfU1 Arll 100% 43% BttfOe • e.ooo.oas
tw; 241h Avarnw ReonntY+cion • SuIMn b 11wwtl a 22nd C#1 Akhvih t001L MI fYt10N { YOO.OOfI
ooe: sweg,srAppnw.WnKnm.n rrs- spraaue+Aov+mmyMishinan w.bon 25x ox 411roa • 530.700
nor,r, am.a«.vff,mtd,m acc irAormeliwn - nm.ew.i .ne Fwx*.. srPM Awrwl, 65+e nn ,airoe • 1.29e.000
ooeB &aad..ay Aw. t3*NYUwbv- 4001o Park Rd. (CK) Ndrorth 0% 0'1i tOfiNB 0 361.000
u171 SIpiW Cwltrt+ier Upprstle Inps NaEe f00l6 0% 11J1109 1 25a,100
oQ77 SprspuslCarYdfn SiPrl - Sprapw and CadJin Uevebp- N11 100% OK t 0ItA0 0 700,000
0m Snuudticwdnh PCC Ineereeehm - Spnpue arn! Bowdish STA IWworth 359G 06 ensroe i on000
PiAo Projet.ii
tnrJ Q1d Semr Center OwnaBYan - 4tlwon md BoodiM ParAs VYrq 100'K D'16 NII'OS i 60.000
ao%3 Park Ho SwimmlrKl F'od U~prwde - Puk Rd. PeAie wMl I00'1t t9'A e/6ro0
mTe Tarioe Viw, Swimmirq pod Uppi~d. - 24th W+a Tan7lde Vl" Paka Weet 100% 19% 515m9 S3.779, 775
W79 Volev MMsion 3nlmmonu ftd Upprsde - 4lsaion Ava. Par1o West 100K 19% N5M
oare VWMv Minlan Park UpqtaOe - Mftumm Ave Parks Akfwortl+
txxn Chikfren's UNvena! Psrk -1linbeeu Perkwey PwMalSwhr Wor1" 016 Q% WN04 f 1.Q00.4U(1
Cectvrwdv Trstl RestrWm VYMnr SeMai Psft 1NoAeY ~
$bow Proawv~m Prawa f 1.?80.000
cYw pstresn I+IIw Raifab - ApOewm'v Ave b 1$tlo Ave Grty IQein n!e 0'A Ef t/OS f 299.988
e0113 GAOntqonxrY Ave Rette6 • AeqcMne Rd 1o UniMerstr Rd C.rIY 1(kln No QX If11/0B f 242000
Rasd Daabn PraUeh
oD-A Mth Avompe PWmay . WaodruR b SRWe (PE) 37P(E) NdNOrSh 0% OM 9/11D0 1 366.000
nrnM1 BmMlwwr Ave Relub - Firirlie'to Thrmrn (PE) STP(U) N*r~OrOh • E00,000
oci9a BrwOway Ave - 4toors 1o Ftors (PE. R1M T1D Aklrorth 6% 0% 10r1A9 ~~,1MODU
BwwN ProNeb
oosa Spa1C'wM - PwutwA - Inda►u weal d AAo►ibomery CRy NR 100l1, 15lb 1111107 4 1e.043
rJ057 Grsndvbw 1lttea - pWvebadc - Buser lo Gement, fdrvlm b ErtnOie CMp AA1 1007L OS'!1 6l7107 f 7,271
OMa 7ronlwnod • Pavetsdt - Vartler b Erertueen, TteM b WeNsslwv CMy ArN 100% 95lL Ot1I07 f I.000
wa1 Rodnww9tamnesfweld pAw I- PrvsErck - RackvwN. Evwpreen lo Suohn CUy J1At 100R 13% 11/1/0!{ ! l1,377
dONI Roekt~d - PeveherJc •/1ve1an m Adatns, Trenl to Wahaah CAy M 100% 16lL 1t11ro6 8 324,e00
OM SummwffW - PoveErelc - Adwn b SulAwn. Tnxnf b OMww)ie CIIY M 100'M 15% 1 if110s { 1m,"4
OW Sutlms • PsveLSek - Everqreen to Praqrses. 16Eh eo EBh Clly IVII 100'14 20% 11/110S 3 167,617
aOB' YVhft Bidh - Pavebazlc - Suikvnn Mu Flora, 4th b ILaulMSV ChY M 100'y, 20% 111108 1 157.205
Oeha1 Prolwb
noioO VHnr Camdor Emnionmenbml Sti+M - UNvvr"V b Tshwbv STPNl VVaMY Jun47 i 283. o0n
aR23 VYev Corrfdor • Proied Z- UnfvwsNv b FverOreen' STP'(V) WbAeY i4.?00,000
oooe 8d1wn Rd Bno" awr TrrM 4speCUo^ Clql VMrst t t 5 nas
opBO Cnv HM Pra7remmnor3tle P'brvfinm CNy KerfYr+
3lwmwaIer Dermt focWr (o9i09) ClN VMest
SUsN Malntswwu Seorape FaUly CMY Itanten
oooa Vmbv Prednd Bldq Fbor Oraln Pa►ka Wem
' p-, IW Funiftq Tobl L 42.609,S47
Vtsvsa+y.mOPUft wMScImpMal Nwwst+um mu u c-wv.mn w.W.i.