Loading...
2014, 01-07 Study Session AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday, January 7,2014 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL The Meeting will be called to order by City Clerk Bainbridge ROLL CALL 1. Chris Bainbridge Council Officer Elections for Mayor and Nominations and Vote Deputy Mayor 2. Christina Janssen Alki Street Vacation(13400 Block of Alki) Discussion/Information 3.John Hohman, Scott Light Industrial Uses Discussion/Information Kuhta 4. Information Only: (will not be reported or discussed): a. Department Monthly Reports b. University Overpass Study Update 5.Mayor Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 6. Mayor Council Check in Discussion/Information 7.Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above,there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However,Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term"action"means to deliberate, discuss,review,consider,evaluate,or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing,or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda January 7,2014 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 7, 2014 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Council Officer Selections GOVERNING LEGISLATION: City of Spokane Valley Resolution 13-005, Governance Manual, Chapter 2, Legislative Process Election of Officers The Governance Manual describes the procedures for electing officers: Biennially, at the first meeting of the new Council,the members thereof shall choose a presiding officer from their number who shall have the title of Mayor. Following the election of the Mayor,there shall be an election for a Deputy Mayor. The term of the Deputy Mayor shall run concurrently with that of the Mayor. (RCW 35A.13.030). • The election for Mayor shall be conducted by the City Clerk. • The City Clerk calls for nominations. • Each member of the City Council shall be permitted to nominate not more than one (1)person; no member of the City Council is obligated to nominate a candidate. Councilmembers may nominate themselves. • Nominations do not require a second. • A nominee who wishes to decline the nomination shall so state at that time. • Nominations are then closed. Once closed,nominations will not be re-opened. • Except when there is only one nominee,election is by written ballot. • Each ballot shall contain the name of the Councilmember who cast it. • Election is determined by majority vote of members present. • If the first round of votes results in no majority vote of members present,the voting process shall be repeated no more than two more times. During subsequent votes, Councilmembers do not have to vote the same as they did in the previous vote. • If after three attempts, Council is unable to agree on a Mayor by majority vote of members present, the Office of Mayor shall be temporarily filled by an Acting Mayor. The office of Acting Mayor shall be filled by the Councilmember who just previously served as Deputy Mayor, or if such person is no longer a member of the Council, the Councilmember with the next highest seniority. The Acting Mayor shall continue in office and exercise such authority as is described in RCW 35A.13 until the members of the Council agree on a Mayor and Deputy Mayor, presumably at the next scheduled council meeting, at which time the role of Acting Mayor shall cease and terminate. The procedure used at a subsequent meeting shall be according to the procedure outlined in the Governance Manual, Chapter 2, Legislative Process Election of Officers. • The City Clerk publicly announces the results of the election. • The City Clerk records the individual councilmember votes in the meeting minutes. The election for Deputy Mayor Shall be conducted by the Mayor-elect, and nominations shall be made in the manner previously described for the election of the Mayor; or if the Mayor-elect prefers, the election for Deputy Mayor will be conducted by the City Clerk. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Conduct election of Mayor and Deputy Mayor STAFF CONTACT: Chris Bainbridge CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 7, 2014 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Street Vacation (STV-2013-0002)-request to vacate an unimproved, half-width, right-of-way section of Alki Avenue GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.79, SVMC 17.80.120 and 22.140 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 14th, 2013 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the street vacation and dedication pursuant to STV-2013-0002 to City Council. BACKGROUND: The applicant, Conard & Hill Development, LLC, requests the vacation of an unimproved, half-width, right-of-way section of Alki Avenue (166.74 feet in length by 19 feet wide). The area to be vacated is located approximately 175 feet east of the intersection of Alki Avenue and McCabe Road and further located between the southern boundary of parcel 45154.0704 and the northern boundary of parcel 45154.1020_ OPTIONS: Proceed to first ordinance reading as proposed; or as amended. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council consensus to bring this forward for a first ordinance reading at the January 14th, 2014 council meeting. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen, Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. PowerPoint Presentation B. Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation C. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission D. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes November 14, 2013 City Council Administrative Report January 7th, 2014 Proposed Street Vacation of a portion of Alki Avenue (STV-2013 -0002) Aerial Map Street Vacation 2 Stokane Val ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION SHP-04-08 14125, el 41-if 1 Plire aine rilr mg 3,1Csrd I 55 1/En..ar l'axelne Med IT(Fisiap 3s4)acr msg.?' -i-.--........ 44+5.1!'(ru r) I 547.1:4: -7 Ems. 0.-%rj —V- •a. 2 _11. 0.4,10 64E+{PLO. SE195013E 1}41}.17' PUir1dIi E114,11 214 47';19., strraot 4 3 Approved Development 5.8 acres Zoned R-4 42 units 6 Tri-plex Buildings 6 Four-plex Buildings *Oka' 1mil COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION 5 8 Findings • Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public The existing dedicated right-of-way has never been improved or provided access for the public. The vacation will provide secondary access for the multi-family development currently under construction to the north. • Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access — The right-of-way was dedicated as part of a short plat that was never constructed and was never improved for public use. • Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public — No substitution is proposed at this time. 10 • Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists. — The surrounding property owners are able to access the properties adjacent to the subject right-of-way from Broadway Avenue and Valleyway Avenue. There are no plans for future development of this right-of-way. It is not in use at this time. • Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? — No public comments have been received and no utilities are located within the right-of-way. 11 Questions ? 12 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION December 12`°,2013 The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval of File No. STV-201 3-0002,vacating a portion of A1ki Avenue. A. Background: 1. Chapter 22.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC), governing street vacations, was adapted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28,2007. 2. The privately-initiated street vacation, STV-2013-0002, proposes to vacate a portion of unimproved Alld Avenue measuring approximately 166,74 feet in length by 19 feet of width, located approximately 175 feet east of the intersection of Aiki Avenue and McCabe Road, 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 14i1`, 2013 and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the street vacation and dedication pursuant to STV-2013-0002 to City Council. B. Planning Commission Findings: Compliance with SVMC 22.140.030 Planning Commission review and recommendation Finding(s): 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The half right-of-ways was never improved with pavement, curb or gutter and remained vacant property. Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owners developing a multi-family development to the north to provide a secondary access to Alki Avenue for their development and to allow for one additional unit. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The south half-street right-of-way was previously vacated and incorporated into the adjacent property, leaving the remaining half right-of-way unusable for public.right-of-way purposes. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way better would be more useful to the public? No substitution is proposed at this time_ The applicant's proposal for lime multi-family development to the north provides primary access from Broadway Avenue, 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? The suriocu ding property owners are able to access the properties adjacent to the right-of-way from Broadway Avenue mid Val leyway Avenue. There are no plans for future development of this right-of-way, It is not in use at this t i me. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? Findings and Re-munendations or the Spokane Valley Planning CDmmissidrn ?age 1 of 3 No written comments have been received as ofthis report. Spokane County Utilities and Avista Utilities have confirmed they have no utilities in the right of way and will not require easements. No additional comments were received by any serving utilities. C. Conclusions: The findings confirm criteria set forth in.SVMC f.149,030 have been met. 1,1. Recommendation; 1. Planning Commission recommends City Council approve [lie vacation of a portion of unimproved Alki Avenue measuring approximately 166.74 feet in length by 19 feet of width, located approximately 175 feet east of the intersection of Alki Avenue and McCabe Road, Planning Commission recommends approval of the vacation subject to the following: 1. The completion of the street vacation (File No STV-2013-0002) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety(90) days following the effective date of approval by the City CQUnc.il. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred to the property owner abutting to the north (Canard ]rliil Development,LLC), 3. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to he vacated,prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and hounds Iegal description, and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community Development, or designee for review. 4. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards. 5. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 6. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the subject right of way to the north shall be automatically extended to the center- of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations, 7. The ordinance vacating the street shall separately address the reliirquishnment of the utility and border easements located adjacent to the vacated street. S. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the City in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Findings and Recommendations of the SpQlxane Valley Hewing Comm issin n Page 2 oia Approved this 12'�day of December,2013 6,--,A)-t--„, Bill ates,Chairman ATTEST Deana orton,Adrntnistrative Assistant I Findings and P Er ortimendations of the Spokane Valley Pia nnilig COW misskin Page 3 cf 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION polneSTAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 40,Valley FILE No: STV-2013--0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: November 5, 2013 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: STV-2013-0002: Request to vacate a portion of unimproved Alki Avenue measuring approximately 166.74 feet in length by 19 feet of width, located approximately 175 feet east of the intersection of Alki Avenue and McCabe Road. STAFF PLANNER: Christina Janssen, Planner, Community Development Department PROPOSAL LOCATION: The unimproved right-of-way is located approximately 175' east of the intersection of Alki Avenue and McCabe Road. PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT: Conard & Hill Development LLC APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. SVMC-Title 22 (Street Vacations) 2. SVMC - Title 21 (Environmental Controls) 3. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards adopted December 2009 ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Aerial Map Exhibit 3: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 4: Agency Comments I PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The unimproved half right-of-way lies approximately 175' east of the Alki Avenue and McCabe Road intersection. It is generally flat and consists of native growth plants and weeds. Comprehensive Plan Designation: Low Density Residential (LDR) Zoning of Property: Single-family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Use: Vacant. Commercial development is proposed for the properties north of the right-of-way. II. STAFF ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 22.140.030—STREET VACATIONS Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The half right-of-way was never improved with pavement, curb or gutter and remained vacant property. Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owners developing a multi-family development to the north to provide a secondary access to Alki Avenue for their development. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The south half-street right-of-way was previously vacated and incorporated into the adjacent property, leaving the remaining half right-of-way unusable for public right-of-way purposes. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way better would be more useful to the public? No substitution is proposed at this time. The applicants proposal for the multi-family development to the north provides primary access from Broadway Avenue. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? The surrounding property owners are able to access the properties adjacent to the right-of-way from Broadway Avenue and Valleyway Avenue. There are no plans for future development of this right-of-way. It is not in use at this time. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? No public comments have been received as of this report. Spokane County Utilities and Avista Utilities have confirmed they have no utilities in the right of way and will not require easements. No additional comments were received by any serving utilities. Conclusions: The findings confirm criteria set forth in Section 22.140.030 of the SVMC have been met. B. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21—ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and Section 21.20.040 of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: No public comments were received. Conclusion(s): A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on the property October 31st, 2013 and notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley permit center and main reception area the same day. Public hearing notices were mailed to a 400' radius of the site on October 31st, 2013 and notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on October 25th, 2013 and November 1St, 2013. Staff concludes that adequate public noticing was conducted for STV-2013-0002 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures and has determined that the proposal meets all applicable development regulations. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Comments were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff report: 1. City of Spokane Valley Development Engineering 2. City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department (Traffic Engineer) 3. Spokane County Utilities 4. Avista Utilities V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV-2013-0002 as proposed is generally consistent or will be made consistent through the application of conditions of approval with the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATIONS: Planning Commission recommend City Council approve the vacation of the unimproved,half-width right-of-way of Alki Avenue located approximately 175' east of the intersection of Alki Avenue and McCabe Road subject to the following: 1. The completion of the street vacation(File No. STV-2013-0002)including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety(90)days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred to the abutting property owner(Conard&Hill Development,LLC). 3. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated,prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construction,repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community Development,or designee for review. 4. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards. 5. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges,copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 6. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 7. The ordinance vacating the street shall separately address the relinquishment of the utility and border easements located adjacent to the vacated street. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Spokane Valley Planning Commission Minutes Council Chambers —City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. November 14,2013 I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Bates called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance III. ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS Present Absent CITY STAFF Kevin Anderson r r Scott Kuhta,Planning Manager Bill Bates-Chair . r Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Christina Carlsen 1 r Christina Janssen,Planner Michael Phillips r r Robert McCaslin(arrived at 6:05 p.m.) r r Steven Neill . r Joe Stoy—Vice Chair F Deanna Horton, Secretary Hearing no objection Mr. McCaslin was excused from the meeting. Mr. McCaslin arrived late and it was noted he arrived in time for the public hearing. IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the agenda as presented. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Neill moved to approve the October 30, 2013 minutes as presented. The motion was seconded and passed unanimously. VI. COMMISSION REPORTS: The commissioners had nothing to report. VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Planning Manager Scott Kuhta reported there was only one day remaining to apply for open positions for the Planning Commission. The openings will be appointed by the Mayor on at the Dec. 17th meeting. Mr. Kuhta shared he had passed out an updated advanced agenda which reflects an upcoming text amendment regarding densities in manufactured housing parks and a preview of the update to the permitted use matrix. Planning Commission Minutes Nov 14,2013 Page 1 of 3 VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. Unfinished Business: There was no unfinished business. B. New Business: Public Hearing for STV-2013-002: Chairman Bates opened the public hearing at 6:07 p.m. and Commissioner Stoy read the rules for a public hearing. Planner Christina Janssen gave an overview of the public hearing subject, street vacation STV- 2013-0002, a vacation of an unimproved, half- width Right-of-Way (ROW) section of Alki Ave, east of McCabe Road. Ms. Janssen presented the applicants as Conard & Hill Development, LLC. Ms. Janssen clarified for the Commissioners and audience some discrepancies in the staff report. She stated the report said the zoning was R-3 however earlier this year this property had been rezoned to an R-4 designation. Also the staff report implied the ROW had been there for some time; however it had been dedicated previously with a short plat, SHP-04-08. At the time of the short plat a 19-foot dedication had been established for connectivity. The staff report stated the vacation was 15 feet wide but it is actually 19 feet in width. The length is listed as 165 feet, it is actually 166.74 feet long. The total vacation is 166.74 x 19 feet, being approx. 175 feet east of the intersection of Alki and McCabe, and it is a half ROW. If the vacation is approved it will become a part of a 3 lot development. The site is 5.8 acres, which will be a gated community for people over 55 with access off of Broadway. The secondary gated access on Alki will be a one-way out-only access required by the Fire Dept. A boundary line adjustment will be done to make the three parcels in the project one parcel. It was during the discussion of the BLA in which the street vacation came up. The development had already been approved; the street vacation is a site clean-up item. If the vacation is not approved it will not impede the development but the developer would lose one housing unit. Ms. Janssen covered the questions from the municipal code which assists in determining if the partial street would be needed in the future, and staffs recommendation is to approve the vacation. Commissioner Anderson asked about the second access being a Fire Dept. requirement. Ms. Janssen stated the Fire Dept requires a second access when there are more than 30 units in a project. This project currently has 42 units. If the vacation is not approved,the development would have 41 units. Mr.Anderson shared he was concerned about connectivity and Alki being a through street in the future, stating the lots to the east could develop and possibly become land locked. Ms. Janssen and Mr Kuhta explained that the City does encourage connectivity but Alki would need to have dedication from each lot as it developed, if it did, and all eastern lots still have access either off of Broadway or Valleyway. It could take years before Alki would go through,if it ever did. However this would be one item for the Commission to consider as part of their decision making. Carl Johnson, 13405 E Valleyway, Mr. Johnson stated he lives behind the project. Mr. Johnson stated he had some general questions. He wondered if there was an easement on the county road, where is stops at Alki. Mr. Johnson stated his sewer goes into the manhole on Alki and did not know if it would cause any problems. He wondered if the 1667.74 feet stopped at the owners' property line.Mr. Johnson said it was stated this would be a gated community, He wanted to know who would be opening the gate. Ms. Janssen stated the developers were here this evening they might want to answer that question. Mr. Johnson said he was concerned about the gate being left open and traffic would go through. He also said he and his wife counted 7 people going through that area, if the gate is left open people will trespass. Commissioner Stoy answered he believed based on the information he read Mr.Johnson's the sewer connection will not be affected. Planning Commission Minutes Nov 14,2013 Page 2 of 3 John Conard, 223 N Lindeblad Lane, Liberty Lake. Mr. Conard is one of the developers of the project. Mr. Conard explained the security gate on Alki is an exit only by the home owners, the ingress would be by the Fire Dept. only. He also said the gate would close automatically after the occupants leave. Seeing no one else who wished to testify,Chair Bates closed the hearing at 6:31 p.m. Commissioner Stoy moved to forward STV-2013-002 on to the City Council. Commissioner Anderson stated it bothered him the City was not going to make arrangements to extend Alki and it is not part of the City's plan. He said he believed the other lots could become land locked making it impossible for them to be developed in the future. Most of the other lots to the east are one acre size roughly. By this vacation he felt there was the possibility to land lock other lots. Commissioner Phillips said development was his specialty, and he was keenly aware of connectivity issues and 600 foot roads with a cul-de-sacs at the end. He said he knew the City usually had a problem with it these issues. He said he felt that in this case if the properties to the east,wanted to develop,Alki could still be developed to the east. It would not run over to McCabe, but it would not be a cul-de-sac in every instance. Hearing no other comments, Chair Bates stated the motion was to recommend to the City Council approval of STV-2013-002. The vote on the motion was seven in favor, zero against, motion passes. X. GOOD OF THE ORDER Mr. Stoy congratulated Chair Bates on his election to the City Council. The Commissioners inquired of the planning students from Eastern about their attendance and thanked them for coming to the meeting. XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no other business the meeting was adjourned at 6:36 p.m. Bill Bates,Chairperson Deanna Horton,PC Secretary Date signed Planning Commission Minutes Nov 14,2013 Page 3 of 3 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 7, 2013 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Light Industrial Policy Review GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council added a review of Light Industrial policies to the 2014 annual Comprehensive Plan update. BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes policies intended to protect industrial properties for industrial uses, therein discouraging other uses. For example, non-industrial uses are allowed if they provide support and/or service to the industrial areas, or if the use is ancillary to an industrial use. The intent of this discussion is for Council to decide if they would consider amending the Light Industrial policies to allow a broader range of non- industrial uses. See attached memorandum for a review of Spokane Valley's Light Industrial policies and a comparison to Spokane and Spokane County's policies. OPTIONS: 1. Make no changes to the Light Industrial policies and remove item from 2014 Comprehensive Plan amendment docket. 2. Direct staff to draft amendments to the Light Industrial policies for review during the 2014 Comprehensive Plan amendment process. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council discretion. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager or John Hohman, CD Director ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memo, Industrial Policy Review 2. Summary of Industrial Comp Plan Policies, Spokane Valley, Spokane and Spokane County 3. Industrial Use Matrices, Spokane Valley, Spokane and Spokane County Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall @spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: City Council; Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager CC: John Hohman, CD Director Date: December 20, 2013 Re: Light Industrial Policy Review City Council added a review of Light Industrial Comprehensive Plan policies to the 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Docket. The following review of the City's policies, with a comparison to Spokane and Spokane County, will assist Council's decision whether to proceed with amended policies or remove the issue from the 2014 amendment docket. SPOKANE VALLEY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL POLICIES Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan limits non-industrial uses to "ancillary" uses that provide support or service to the industrial areas. For example, restaurants and computer services are permitted uses in the Light Industrial zones. The Comprehensive Plan further states that "non-industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses." Specific goals and policies that further these general statements include the following: Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP-12.3 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or assemble products on-site. SPOKANE VALLEY ZONING The Comprehensive Plan goals and policies that direct the types of uses in Light Industrial areas are largely implemented through the Schedule of Permitted Uses, or "Permitted Use Matrix." Determinations were made based on Comprehensive Plan policies whether uses would be permitted, not permitted, or would require a conditional use permit to locate in different zones (see attached Permitted Use Matrix with permitted light industrial uses highlighted). Page 1 of 3 Existing Light Industrial Businesses The following chart shows examples of existing Spokane Valley businesses located in the Light Industrial zone. Business Name Business Type Address Ewing Irrigation Products, Inc. Irrigation Equipment Supply 11511 E. Indiana Rolling Frito Lay Sales Warehouse/Distribution 10606 E. Montgomery Pyrotek, Inc Industrial Equipment Supply 9601 E. Montgomery Central Valley School District Administrative Offices 19307 E. Cataldo 12 String Brewing Micro-Brewery 11616 E. Montgomery CITY OF SPOKANE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL POLICIES The City of Spokane's Comprehensive Plan similarly discusses appropriate uses in industrial areas, highlighting the concern about maintaining an adequate inventory of industrial land for industrial uses. The City of Spokane includes the following policy: LU 1.10 Industry Provide a variety of industrial locations and site sizes for a variety of industrial development and safeguard them from competing land uses. The City's discussion under this policy further highlights the concern about permitting non-industrial uses in industrial areas, as follows: "Commercial and office uses have historically been permitted in most areas that are designated for industrial use. Continuation of this practice may lead to the displacement of the vital industrial lands needed for the economic vitality of the city. The industrial lands inventory in the city and the urban growth area should be evaluated to determine which industrial lands should be preserved for exclusive industrial use and which areas should continue to allow commercial use. In most cases, residential use is not appropriate in the industrial designation because of off-site impacts generated by industrial uses and the lack of residential amenities in these areas. However, river-oriented residential use is allowed in areas along the Spokane River where residents can take advantage of the river amenity. Residential uses should be carefully designed to be compatible with industrial uses. This compatibility may be maintained by using slope to other means or separate uses, and through buffers, landscaping, setbacks, fencing or other appropriate measures. The intent is to avoid conflicts between residential and industrial uses permitted in these areas." CITY OF SPOKANE ZONING Spokane implements its land use policies through a highly consolidated use matrix. The City does allow many non-industrial uses in their Light Industrial zone. However, the impact of the non- industrial uses is mitigated to some degree by size limitations. For example, retail sales and services, which include a wide range of non-industrial uses, are allowed in their Light Industrial zone. The size of development is limited to 60,000 sq ft, including floor area plus outdoor sales, display and storage areas (see attached matrix showing industrial zone uses in Spokane). SPOKANE COUNTY LIGHT INDUSTRIAL POLICIES Spokane County's general description of Light Industrial Areas is as follows: Page 2 of 3 "The Light Industry category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility. Light Industry areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses but may incorporate office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial area. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors." Specific County policies relating to Light Industrial areas include the following: Goal UL.16 A variety of strategically located light industry areas should be designated and protected. Policies-Light Industrial UL.16.1 Identify and designate land areas for light industry. UL.16.2 Light Industrial areas shall be comprised of predominantly industrial uses but may incorporate office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial area. Residential use will not be allowed except for master planned industrial developments that provide residences intended to house employees for the planned industrial use. SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING Similar to the City of Spokane, Spokane County implements its land use polices through a consolidated permitted use matrix (see attached). Determinations are made through the permitted use matrix whether a use should be allowed in the Light Industrial zone, presumably guided by Comprehensive Plan policies. There are no size limitations on non-industrial uses in the Light Industrial zone. Spokane County permits retail uses in the Light Industrial zone under the following conditions: 1. Accessory retail sales (LI, HI zones) a. The retail sales shall be directly related to and accessory to an allowed use. b. The product must be produced or processed on the site and the retail use must be clearly incidental to the primary industrial use. 5. Commercial uses, general, not elsewhere classified(LI zone) a. Permitted uses in Light Industrial shall also include all uses permitted in the commercial zone matrix in the Regional Commercial zone not elsewhere classified, except for adult retail use establishment and adult entertainment establishment and except for single family, duplex, and multifamily residential uses. Provided further, those uses listed under Regional Commercial as an accessory or conditional use shall also be permitted as accessory or conditional uses in the Light Industrial zone. Provided further, Regional Commercial uses allowed in the Light Industrial zone shall meet all the Regional Commercial development standards as set forth in Section 14.612.300. Unless specifically prohibited, most retail uses can locate in the Light Industrial zone without limitation. One could argue that this allowance is inconsistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan. CITY COUNCIL OPTIONS: The issue before Council is to decide whether to amend the Light Industrial policies to allow a wider range of uses to locate in Light Industrial zones or to keep the Comprehensive Plan policies as originally adopted. Page 3 of 3 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GOALS AND POLICIES CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, CITY OF SPOKANE AND SPOKANE COUNTY Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Light Industry(general description) The Light Industry designation is a planned industrial area with special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping, and internal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low-impact industries. Light Industry areas may incorporate office and commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. Non- industrial uses should be limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. Industrial Goals & Policies Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. Policies LUP-10.1 Plan capital facility expenditures to assist the development of lands designated for industrial uses. LUP-10.2 Encourage a diverse array of industries to locate in Spokane Valley. LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Goal LUG-12 Designate and protect a variety of strategically located light industry areas. Policies LUP-12.1 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP-12.2 Light industry areas shall include lighting, sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. LUP-12.3 Retail outlets shall be allowed for industrial businesses that manufacture and/or assemble products on-site. Page 1 of 3 City of Spokane Comprehensive Plan LU 1.10 Industry Provide a variety of industrial locations and site sizes for a variety of industrial development and safeguard them from competing land uses. Discussion: Planned industrial locations should be free from critical areas, not subject to conflicting adjacent land uses, readily accessible to adequate transportation, utility, and service systems, and convenient to the labor force. Commercial and office uses have historically been permitted in most areas that are designated for industrial use. Continuation of this practice may lead to the displacement of the vital industrial lands needed for the economic vitality of the city. The industrial lands inventory in the city and the urban growth area should be evaluated to determine which industrial lands should be preserved for exclusive industrial use and which areas should continue to allow commercial use. In most cases, residential use is not appropriate in the industrial designation because of off-site impacts generated by industrial uses and the lack of residential amenities in these areas. However, river-oriented residential use is allowed in areas along the Spokane River where residents can take advantage of the river amenity. Residential uses should be carefully designed to be compatible with industrial uses. This compatibility may be maintained by using slope to other means or separate uses, and through buffers, landscaping, setbacks, fencing or other appropriate measures. The intent is to avoid conflicts between residential and industrial uses permitted in these areas. 3.5 DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE DESIGNATIONS Light Industrial: This designation is intended for those lighter industrial uses, which produce little noise, odor, or smoke. River-oriented residential use is permitted in the light industrial designation. Spokane County Light Industry The Light Industry category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility. Light Industry areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses but may incorporate office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial area. The Light Industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. Incompatible Uses in Designated Light Industrial Areas Residential uses should not be allowed in lands designated for Light Industry except for master planned industrial developments that provide residences intended to house employees for the planned industrial use. Page 2 of 3 Goal UL.16 A variety of strategically located light industry areas should be designated and protected. Policies -Light Industry UL.16.1 Identify and designate land areas for light industry. UL.16.2 Light Industrial areas shall be comprised of predominantly industrial uses but may incorporate office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial area. Residential use will not be allowed except for master planned industrial developments that provide residences intended to house employees for the planned industrial use. UL.16.3 Industrial uses may be appropriate in mixed-use developments of residential, commercial and light industrial, provided there is adequate mitigation of land use conflicts and community character and property values are preserved. UL.16.4 Light industrial areas shall include sidewalks, bike lanes on arterial streets and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. Pathways for pedestrians and bikes may be substituted for sidewalks on local access streets. Page 3 of 3 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 711 Adult entertainment establishment S S Chapter 19.80 SVMC 453 Adult retail use establishment S S Chapter 19.80 SVMC 311 Agricultural processing plant, warehouse P P 481219 Airstrip, private P P 62191 Ambulance service P P P P P P P 54194 Animal clinic/veterinary P S P P P SVMC 19.60.040(B)(1) 311613 Animal processing facility P S S S S S S 112 S S Excluding NAICS 1122, Swine. SVMC 19.40.150. Animal raising and/or keeping 81291 Animal shelter S P P SVMC 19.60.080(B)(6) 31161 Animal slaughtering and processing P 45392 Antique store P P P P P 448 Apparel/tailor shop P P P P P P P 443111 Appliance sales/service P P P P A A Only if manufactured/ assembled on premises. 45392 Art gallery/studio P P P P P P P 333 Assembly—heavy P 334 Assembly—light P P P P P P 1 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions P P P 623312 Assisted living facility P P P P 4533 Auction house P P P P 4533 Auction yard(excluding livestock) P P 1152 Auction yard,livestock P 3361 Automobile assembly plant P 922 Automobile impound yard P P 441 Automobile/light truck sales and service P P P P 4853 Automobile/taxi rental P P P P P P P 811121 Automobile/truck/RV/motorcycle painting, repair,body and fender S S P P P Enclosed structure only. SVMC 19.60.050(B)(3). works 4413 Automotive parts,accessories and tires P P P P P P 445291 Bakery, retail P P S S P P P A A Floor area limited to 10% of Gross Leasable Floor Area(GLFA)not to exceed 1,000 sf. 52211 Bank,savings/loan and other financial institutions P P P P P P P P P 2 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 8121 Barber/beauty shop P P P P P P P P P P P P P P 721191 Bed and breakfast P P P 11291 Beekeeping,commercial P S S S 11291 Beekeeping, hobby SVMC 19.40.150(C) 4511 Bicycle sales/service P P P P P P P P P 336611 Boat building, repair and maintenance P P 441222 Boat sales/service P P P P 4512 Book/stationery store P P P P P P P 3121 Bottling plant P P 71395 Bowling alley P P P P 722 Brewery,micro P P P P P P P P P 3121 Brewery,winery and/or distillery P P P P P P 4441 Building supply and home improvement P S P P P Floor area limited to 50,000 sq.ft.or less 445292 Candy and confectionery P P P P P P P P P 71399 Carnival,circus T T T T T T 3219 Carpenter shop P P P P 561740 Carpet and rug cleaning plants P P 3 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 811192 Carwash P P S P P P P SVMC 19.60.040(B) 7132 Casino P P P P 454113 Catalog and mail order houses P P P P P P P 72232 Catering services P P P P P P P P P P 8122 Cemetery P 451112 Ceramics shop P P P P P P P P P P P P 813 Church,temple,mosque,synagogue and parsonage P P P P P P P 4481 Clothes, retail sales P P P P P 49312 Cold storage/food locker P P 6113 College or university P P P P P P 517 Communication service/sales P P P P P P P S S S S S S 921 — 922 S S S S S S S S S S See zoning districts for conditions. Community facilities P P P 8134 Community hall,club,or lodge P P P P P P P P P P 6232 Community residential facility(6 or less residents) P P P 6232 Community residential facility(greater than 6 residents, no more than 25) 4 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 56173 Composting storage/processing, commercial P 54151 Computer services P P P P P P P P P 2373— 238 P P Contractor's yard P P P 623 Convalescent home,nursing home P P 44512 Convenience store P P A A P P P P P Crematories P P P P P P P P P P P 6233 Day care,adult P P A P P P A A C C C C P P 624410 Day care,child(13 children or more) P P A A P A A P P P P P P 624410 Day care,child(12 children or fewer) P P A A P P P A A 4521 Department/variety store P P P P 8123 Dry cleaners P P A P P P P 812332 Dry cleaning, laundry, linen supply plant,commercial P P 3211114 Dry kiln P S S S 814 Dwelling,accessory apartments SVMC 19.40.100 814 Dwelling,caretaker's residence S S S S S S SVMC 19.60.060(8)(1) P P 7213 Dwelling,congregate P P P 5 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions P P P P 814 Dwelling,duplex P P P P P 814 Dwelling,multifamily P P S S SVMC 19.60.020(B) P P P P P P 814 Dwelling,single-family P P S S SVMC 19.60.020(B) P P P 814 Dwelling,townhouse P P P 334— 335 Electrical/electronic/computer component and system manufacturing/assembly P P P P P P P 713 Entertainment/recreation facilities, indoor P P P P P P C 7139 Entertainment/recreation facilities, outdoor P P P P P P 5323 Equipment rental shop P P P P P 8113 Equipment sales, repair,and maintenance P P P P P 7222 Espresso/latte retail service P P P P P P P P P R R R R R R 92 Essential public facilities R R R R R R R Chapter 19.90 SVMC A A 71394 Exercise facility/gym/athletic club P P A P P P P A A 493190 Explosive storage P P P P P P P P 814 Family home,adult P P P P 6 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions P P P P P P 814 Family home,child P P P P 441222 Farm machinery sales and repair P P P 112112 Feed lot P 311211 Feed/cereal/flour mill P P 81292 Film developing P P A A P P P 44313 Film/camera sales/service P P A A P P P 4531 Florist shop P P A A P P P P 44521 Food sales,specialty/butcher shop/meat market/specialty foods P P S P P SVMC 19.60.040(B)(3) 484 Freight forwarding P P 447 Fueling station P P P A P P P P 81221 Funeral home P P P 453 Gift shop P P A A P P P A S S S S S S 71391 Golf course P S P P Chapter 2260 SVMC C C C C C C 71391 Golf driving range/training center P C S P P Chapter 2260 SVMC 49313 Grain elevator P P 44422 Greenhouse, nursery,garden center, retail P P P P P P 7 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 1114 Greenhouse, nursery,commercial S S P P SVMC 19.60.050(B)(3) 4451 Grocery store P P S P P SVMC 19.60.040(B)(3) 44413 Hardware store P P S P P SVMC 19.60.040(B)(3) 562211 Hazardous waste treatment and storage S S SVMC 21.40.060 4812 Heliport P P 4812 Helistop C C C C P 45112 Hobby shop P P P P P P P 442 Home furnishings, retail sale P P P P P 6221 Hospital P P P P P R R R R R R 622210 Hospital, psychiatric and substance abuse R R R R R R R R 622310 Hospital,specialty P P P P P A A 7211 Hotel/motel P P P P P P 312113 Ice plant P P 45322 Jewelry,clock, musical instrument assembly,sales/service P P A P P P P P 81291 Kennel,indoor kennel,doggie day care facility S S S S P P See zoning districts for conditions. 8 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 54138 Laboratories(Bio Safety Level 2) P P P 54138 Laboratories(Bio Safety Level 3) P P P 54138 Laboratories(Bio Safety Level 4) P P 62151 Laboratories, medical and diagnostic P P P P P 44419 Landscape materials sales P P P P P A A A 812310 Laundromat P P A P P P P 4453 Liquor store P P A A P P 561622 Locksmith P P A A P P P 3211 Lumbermill,sawmill,shingle mill, plywood mill P 33271 Machine shop P P P 236115 Manufactured home fabrication P P S S S S S 814 Manufactured home park SVMC 19.40.130 45393 Manufactured home sales P P P Manufacturing 336411 Aircraft manufacturing P 33522 Appliances manufacturing P P 32412 Asphalt plant/manufacturing P 9 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 31181 Bakery products manufacturing P P 33591 Battery rebuilding/manufacturing P P 339994 Broom manufacturing P P 325 Chemical manufacturing P 3342 Communications equipment manufacturing P P P P 339 Cosmetic and miscellaneous manufacturing P P 322226 Emery cloth and sandpaper manufacturing P P 32592 Explosive manufacturing P 3253 Fertilizer manufacturing P 311 Food product manufacturing/storage P 337 Furniture manufacturing P P 315 Garment manufacturing P P 32591 Ink manufacturing P 333 Machine/machinery manufacturing P P 3391 Medical and laboratory instrument/apparatus manufacturing P P P 10 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 327 Nonmetallic metal products manufacturing P P Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing P 32411 Petroleum and coal products manufacturing P 32511 Plastic and rubber products manufacturing P 314991 Rope manufacturing P P 325212 Rubber reclamation, manufacturing/fabrication P 33995 Sign manufacturing/repair P P 32561 Soap and cleaning compound manufacturing P 31411 Textile manufacturing P P 56292 Tire, recap and retread manufacturing P 321 Wood product manufacturing P P 453998 Market,outdoor P P P P P P 621498 Massage therapy P P P P P P P 3116— Meat/fish canning,cutting,curing and P P 11 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 3117 smoking 42345 Medical,dental,and hospital equipment supply/sales P P P P P 6214 Medical/dental clinic P P P P P P P 621 Medical/dental office P P P P P P P 332 Metal fabrication P P 332 Metal plating P 332 Metal processes,hot P 212 Mining P 722330 Mobile food vendors S S S S S S S S S S SVMC 19.60.010(H) T T T T T T 236115 Model home units 71211 Museum P P P P P P 45114 Music store P P A A P P P A A 561 Office P P P P P P P P P 45321 Office and computer supplies P P A P P P P P 999 Off-road recreational vehicle use P P 1113 Orchard,tree farming,commercial P P 32211 Paper/pulp mills P 12 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 4859 Park-and-ride facility P P P P P P P 522298 Pawnshop P P P P 812 Personal service P P P P P P P 45391 Pet shop P P A P P P 44611 Pharmacy P P A P P P P P 54192 Photographic studio P P P P P P 326199 Plastic injection molding,thermoset P 326199 Plastic injection molding, thermoplastic P P P P P P 326199 Plastic injection solvent molding P 491 Post office,postal center P P P P P P P P P 221 Power plant(excluding public utility facilities) P 56143 Print shop P P A P P P P P P 323 Printing,reprographics, bookbinding services,commercial P P 48849 Public pay parking garage/lot P P P P P S S S S S S 221 S S P P P P P P P P See zoning districts for conditions. Public utility distribution facility 13 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions S S S S S S 237 S S S S S S S S S S See zoning districts for conditions. Public utility transmission facility 71399 Racecourse P P P P 711212 Racetrack P P 5151 Radio/TV broadcasting studio P P P P P P 4821 Railroad yard, repair shop and roundhouse P 7212 Recreational vehicle park/campground C S SVMC 19.60.060 44121 Recreational vehicle sales and service P P P P 56292 Recycling facility S S S P P P P P P P P 51511 Repeater facility P P P P P P 7222 Restaurant,drive-in P P P P P P 7222 Restaurant,drive-through P P A C P P P P 722 Restaurant,full service P P A P P P P P P 452— 453 Retail sales P P A P P P A A Limited to items manufactured on the premises. 71399 Riding stable C P P 14 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 33122 Rolling mill P P P P P P P 6111 Schools,public and private, K through 12 P P P P P P 6114 Schools,professional,vocational and trade schools P P P P P P P P 4533 Secondhand store,consignment sales P P P P P S SVMC 19.70.010(B)(9) Showroom P P P P P P 33995 Sign painting shop P P P P P 56292 Solid waste recycling/transfer site S S S SVMC 19.60.060(B) 6116 Specialized training/learning schools or studios P P P P S P P Adaptive reuse of existing structures only. No expansion allowed. P P 49319 Storage,self-service facility P P P P P P 493 S S S S P See zoning districts for conditions. Storage,general—outdoors Tank storage, LPG above ground S S S S S S S SVMC 21.40.060 213112 Tank storage,critical material above ground S S SVMC 21.40.060 213112 Tank storage,critical material below ground S S S S SVMC 21.40.060 15 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions 3161 Tanning,curing of hides and skins P 7224 Tavern P P P P P Taxidermy P P P S S S S S S 5172 Telecommunication wireless antenna array S S C S S S S S Chapter 22.120 SVMC C C C C C C 5172 Telecommunication wireless support tower S S C S S S S S Chapter 22.120 SVMC 711 Theater, indoor P P P P P 711 Theater,outdoor P P P P S S S S S S 5179 Tower, ham operator S S C S S S S SVMC 19.40.110(A) 221119 Tower,wind turbine support C S S S S S SVMC 19.40.110(B) 4851 Transit center P P P P P P P C 7213 Transitional housing 441222 Truck sales, rental, repair and maintenance P P 445— 447 Truck stop P P 81142 Upholstery shop P P P P P 49311 Warehousing A S P A P P Adaptive reuse of existing 16 of 17 R- 1 R- 2 R- 3 R- 4 MF- 1 MF- 2 NAICS Schedule of Permitted Uses Appendix 19-A Mixed Use Center Corridor Mixed Use Garden Office Office Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial Regional Commercial ParkslOpen Space I-1 Light Ind. 1-2 Heavy Ind. Reference Conditions structures. No expansion allowed. 56292 Wrecking, recycling,junk and salvage yards C S SVMC 19.60.060(B) P Permitted Use A Accessory Only R Regional Siting T Temporary Permit S Conditions Apply C Conditional Use Permit (Ord. 13-003§3(Exh.A),2013; Ord. 12-022§3(Att.A),2012;Ord. 12-021 §4,2012; Ord. 11-021 §1,2011;Ord. 10-005§1 (Exh.A),2010; Ord.09-036§6,2009; Ord.09-017§1,2009; Ord.09-010§1,2009; Ord.09-006§5,2009; Ord.08-026§1,2008;Ord.08-002§1,2008;Ord.07-015§4,2007). 17 of 17 C 5p 2 Lk e 1231/20113 Spokane Municipal Cod] Spokane Municipal Code Tuesday, l]ererfther 31, 2013-1111:2I AM I = '', — Font Size:Increase l Decrease Title 17C Land Use Standards Chapter 17C.13O Industrial Zones Section 17c.130.100 Industrial Zones Primary Uses A, Permitted Uses(P). Uses permitted in the industrial zones are listed in Table 17CC.130-1 with a°P."These uses are allowed if they conpiy with the development standards and other standards of this chapter. B. Limited Uses(L). Uses allowed that are subject to lire tations are listed in Table 17C.130-1 with an"L."These uses are allowed if they comply with the Ilrr>itatians as listed in the footnotes following the table and the development standards and other standards of this chapter. In addition, a use or development listed in Part 3 of this division, Special Use Standards, is also subject to the standards of those chapters, C. Conditional Uses(CU). Uses that are allowed if approved through the conditional use review process are listed in Table 170.130-1 with a"CU." These uses are a llowed provided they carrply with the conditional use approval criteria for that use,the development standards,and other standards of this chapter. Uses listed with a"CUJ"that also have a footnote nurrher in the table are subject to the standards cited in the footnote. In addition,a use or development listed in Part 3 of this division,Special Use Standards, is also subject to the standards of those chapters.The conditional use review process and approval criteria are stated in celepter t: .,3?c3 itc, Conditional Uses. D. Uses Not Permitted(N). Uses listed in Table 17C.130-1 with an"N"are not permitted. Existing uses In categories listed as not permitted may be subject to the standards of s*-r 171-.710 574F, Nonconforming Situations. Table 17C.130-1 Industrial Zones Primary Uses Use is: P—Permitted; N—Not Permitted; LI Zone HI Zone PI Zone L—Allowed, but with (Light Industrial) (Heavy Industrial) (Planned Industrial) Special Lireitations; CU—Conditional Use Review Required Residential Categories Group UvJngi _ LIi] N Lf31 Residential Household L[ ] L2] L ] Living Commercial Categories Adult Business L[47 N N H 1Z131i2013 Spokane Municipal Code Cormercial Outdoor !s P CU Recreation Commercial Parking P P P Drive-through Facility P P P Major Event ,CU CU C'1 Entertainment Office P P P Quick Vehicle Servicing Retail Sales and Service L/CU[S] L;'CU[61 L[?] Mimi-storage Fadllties L[8] L[B] L[8] Vehicle repair P P P Industrial Categories High Impact Use L[9] L[g] N Industrial Service P P P Manufacturing and p p p Produdtivn Railroad Yard5 CU P P Warehouse and Freight Movement Waste-related CU CU CU Wholesale Sales P P F' Institutional Categories Basic Utilities P P Colleges P Hi 12(3112019 Spoluno Municipal Gods Conmuraily Service I P N I N ' Daycare P CU 410) Medical Center's P N L[10] Parks and Open Areas P CU P Religious institutions P N N Schools P N L[10] Other Categories Agriculture I P P I P Aviation and Surface P P P Passenger Ternina ks Detention Facifrties CU CU CU Essential Public CU CU CU Facilities Miring CU CU CU Rail lines and Utility p P I P Corridors Wireless Corurrunicat on L/CUEl1] LJCU[11] 1../CU[11] Facilities Notes: r The use categories are described In ch ,pt, r 10.7 , . Si C. a Standards that correspord to the bracketed numbers[I are specified in c11c_.2c,130.1to. •Specific arses and developments rruy be subject to the standards In Part 3 di this&v sion, Special Use Standards. •Standards applicable to conditional uses are stated in chapter 170.320 SMC. Date Passed: ?Monday, Naverter 7, 200 ORD 033751 Section 1 4 S po I&( (o 4 2013 Printing Chapter 14.614 Industrial Zones 94.614.1t7Q� Pureose en. Intent The purpose of the !industrial Zones chapter is to implement Comprehensive Plan goals and policies related to industrial use, Industrial businesses are important to the local economy because they provide family wage jobs and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the reg on. The industrial zone classifications implement the Comprehensive Plan by allowing industrial uses in designated areas with evailaole infrastructure and an adequate supply of land. Businesses within industrial zones are primarily focused on producing goods or services that are sold or used outside of-the industrial zone. Although sales to the general public(i.e. retail sales) may occur on the premises of some of these business under certain conditions, such sales would not normally be the main focus of that business. An exception would be for limited numbers of commercial (retail)establishments providing goods or services primarily to the businesses and people working within the industrial zone. Most often, industrial-zone businesses would not need to provide for regular and frequent access by the generate public, hut might need to provide for regular and frequent access for the transportation of materials by road, rail, air, or water, This access for Industrial transportation is often incompatible with extensive access by the general public. industrial users often have special needs for locating their businesses. Such needs might include combinations of large, contiguous:oareels; proximity to rail sidings, airports,trucking routes, water routes, or sources of large amounts of water, or power; large wastewater capacity;availability of telecommunications channels; etc. Industrial zones are usually chosen to protect land with cernbinations of these services for industrial businesses, The Light Industrial (LI)zone is Intended for industrial businesses that need industrial resources, but that do not have the patentisl impacts on surrounding areas that heavy industrial users do. Light industrial areas often have a.special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and community compatibility. Light Industrial areas are comprised of predominantly industrial uses but may incorporate office and neighborhood-sized commercial uses that support and conopliment the industrial a-ea, Residential use is generally discouraged except for master planned industrial developments that provide residences intended to house employees of the planned industrial use. The Heavy Industrial (HI)zone is characterized by intense industria"activities that may have Impacts on surrounding areas, including, but not limited to noise, odor or aesthetic impacts, Commercial, residential and recreational uses are discouraged, except for small--scale secondary uses serving the industrial area. 14.614.210 'Noes of Uses The uses for the incustrial zones shall be as permitted in table 614-1, Industrial Zones Matrix. Accessory uses and structures ordinarily associated with a permitted use shall be allowed. Multiple uses are allowed per lot,except that only one residential use is allowed per lot unless otherwise specified. The uses are categorized as follows: 1, Permitted Uses: Permitted uses are des gneted in table 614-1 with the letter P . These uses are allowed if they comply with the development standards of the zone. 2. Limited Uses: Limited uses are designated in table 614-1 with the letter"L" These uses are allowed if they comply with the development standards of the zone and specific performance standards in section 14.614.230. 3. Conditional Uses: Conditional uses are designated in table 614-1 with the letters 'CS. These uses require a public hearing and approval of a condi 2013 Printing chapter 14.44]4, Conditional Use Permits. Conditional uses illustrated in table 614-1 are also subject to specific standards and criteria as required in this chapter under section 14.614.240. 4. Not Permitted: Uses designated in table 614-1 with the letter"N"are not permitted. All uses not specifically authorized by this Code are prohibited, 5. Essential Public Facilities(EPF): Facilities that may have statewide or regional/countywide significance are designated in table 614-1 with the letters'EPF". These uses shall be evaluated to determine applicability with the"Essential Public Facility Siting Process", as amended. e. Use Determinations: It is recognized that all possible uses and variations of uses cannot be reasonably Fisted in a use matrix_ The Director may classify uses not specifically addressed in the matrix consistent with section 14,6O4.300. Classifications shall be consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. 14.614.220 Industrial Zones Matrix Table 614-1,Industrial Zones Matrix Industrial Light fndrrstrlal Heavy Industrial Animal processing facility hJ P Auto wreckingirecycling,junk andlcr salvage yards Battery manufacture and reprocessing CL Boat building, repair and maintenance Caretaker's residence Chemical manufacturing rV linen pp p Communications service systems p p Concrete product manufocturirgf ready-mix concrete p P excludln! extraction/mining) Contractors yard Drop hammer or forge ld Electrical component manufacturing/assembly Flammable Ilquidlgas storage Lumber-rill,sawmill,shingle mill, plywood mill Lumberyard Machine shop lrlanuraoture and processing cf coal, mineral CU or animal b -rroducts _ Manufacture and storage or explosives Manufacturing and production,not elsewhere classified L L Medical equipment supply p p Minima, rock crushing, asphalt plant l►1 L Nursery/greenhouse/wholesale p p Paper/pu p mills N CU Petroleum manufacturing or refining Planned unit development L L Spokane County Page 614.2 Industrial Zones Zoning Code Chapter 14.514 2013 Printing Table 614-1r industrial Zones Matrix •continued industrial Light Industrial Heavy industrial Plastic injection molding,Including toot and dye making t' P Railroad yard (EPF) N P Rendering plant N Cl! Research facility/laboratory P P Sandblasting/cutting P P Smelter and are reduction N CU Stockyard, hog farm slaughterhouse N N Tanneries N CU Tire salvage yard N L Warehousing and freight movement P P Welding,sheet metal Shoes P p _ Wholesaling(retail sales prohibited) P P Woodworking, cabinet shop p p Commercial Business - Light Industrial Heavy industrial Accessory retail sales L L Adult entertainment establishment N N Adult retail use estahllshment N N Agriculture P p Ambulance service P P Auction yard(excluding livestazkj _ P F Auto to t sales P N AutomobilellrucWtaxi rental P P Automotive impound yard P P Blllbcerdivicteo board — N N Building supply and hardware distribution and/or sales P P Car wash, automatic or self service P P Catalog and mail order houses P N Child day-care center P P Circus P P Commercial . I N Construction/industrial equipment sales or rental P P Convenience stare/gas station P R Exercise fad ity/gyre/ath etc club P P Financial institution P P Hotel/motel P N Kennel L L Livestock auction yard _ N N Neignberhood business uses, rot elsewhere classified L N Manufactured home sales P N Motor vehicle parts sales P N Office supply sales P P Office, business/professlonellmedical P P t'ardoipant sports and recreation(indoor only) P N Spokane Caurrty Page 614-3 Industriar Zones Zoning Code Chapter 14.614 2013 Prinking Table 614.1. Industrial Zones Matrix–continued Commercial Business Light industrial Heavy Industrial Participant sports and recreation (outdoor only) L N Printing, reprographics,, bookbinding P P and graphic services Restaurant, Including drive-through P P —t Recreational vet icleltra;ler sales P N Sei`-service storage facility(mini-storage) P P Service and repair of motorized Vehieieslboats P P Service station,automablleltruck P P Spectator sports facility(EPF) P P Top soil removal CU CU Residential _ LightIndust/let Heavy industrial Family day-oare provider P P Residential use N NJ institutional Light Industrial Heavy industrial Animal shelter p p Animal,wildlife rehabioita1icrt or scientfic research facility P P Beekeeping L L College orunivversity(EPF) P N Detention facility(EPF) CU P Fire station P P Government cffieeslrnaintanance facilities(EPF) P P Law enforcement facility(EPF) L F Park, public P l= Secure community transitional facility(EPF) CU CU Trade/technical school P N Transit facilities (EPF) p P LitilftiesfFacili#ies Light Industrial Heavy frrdrrstrral Critical materials tank storage L Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, off-site I N L Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, on-site L L Incinerator(EPF) CU CU Landfill(EPF) N CU Landfill,inert waste disposal facility N CU Power plant(EPF) N CU Public utility local distribution facility F p Public utility transmission facility(EPF) _ L L _ Sewage treatment plant(EPF; CU CU Solid waste hauler CU _ P Solid waste recycling transfer site(EPF) L L Stormwater treatmentidlisposai p P Tower _ L L Wireless communication antenna array _ L L 1lllfreless communication support tower L L Spokane County Page 614-4 Industrial Zones Zoning Cie Chapter 14.614 - .l ley ....0010. 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 + Fax: 5{19.971,1008 + rityhall®spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Mark Calhoun, Finance Director Date: December 17, 2013 Re Finance Department Activity Report — November 2013 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of November 2013 and included herein is a 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the month of November, 2012 Yearend Process The 2012 books were closed in April 2013 and the annual report was completed in advance of the annual audit which began August 8. The audit exit conference is scheduled for December 6, 2013. Lodging Tax Council has had a number of discussions regarding the distribution of lodging tax proceeds thus far in 2014 and this will culminate with the 2013 grant process leading to 2014 grant awards. The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • September 4 Letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers. • October 4 Grant applications due at City Hall. • October 16 Grant applicant presentations to lodging tax advisory committee. • October 29 Admin report to Council on results of lodging tax advisory committee meeting. • December 10 City Council motion consideration: Award lodging tax for 2014. Fee Resolution As a part of preparing the annual budget City Departments are asked to review the Master Fee Schedule that is currently in place and determine whether changes in fees charged and/or language used in the governing resolution should be altered. This leads to an annual update to the fee resolution that sets fees for the following year. The calendar leading to the adoption of the resolution setting 2014 fees is as follows: • November 12 Admin report on proposed changes to the fee resolution • December 10 Council adoption of the fee resolution. Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2013 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2013 Budget was adopted (and amended on October 22) is located on pages 5 through 16. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from — - _ - - p'lFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11.docx Page 1 records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures, The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in the 2012 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The amended 2013 Budget as adopted. o November 2013 activity. o Cumulative 2013 activity through November 2013. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 91.12% of the amount budgeted with 91.7% of the year elapsed, This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are collected. • Property tax collections have reached $10,176,597 or 92.99% of the amount budgeted. Property taxes are paid to Spokane County Treasurer in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31. The greatest portion of these monies are then remitted to the City in May and November, with lesser amounts typically received in June and December. • Sales tax collections represent only 10-months of collections thus far because taxes collected in November are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of December. Collections are currently $13,817,462 or 90.61% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $406,112 or 66.33% of the amount budgeted. These taxes are paid quarterly with the third quarter taxes due by October 31. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. Through November we have received $939,944 or 82,81% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through November we've received remittances totaling $1,344,571 or 79.82% of the amount budgeted. • Fines, forfeitures and penalties revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through November 2013 we've received remittances for the period January through October with receipts of $1,291,345 or 79.11% of the amount budgeted. • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permits and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently $1,633,037 or 139.10% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in-season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $528,725 or 92.52% of the amount budgeted. P.IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11.docx Page 2 Recurring expenditures are currently at 83.48% of the amount budgeted with 91.7% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. Investments (page 17) Investments at November 30th total $47,001,166 and are composed of$41,941,463 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,059,703 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 18) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through November and total $15,577,848 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $1,154,426 (8.00%) greater than for the same 10-month period in 2012. Economic Indicators (pages 19 —21) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 19) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 20) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 19 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2004. • Compared with calendar year 2012, 2013 collections have increased by $1,062,854 or 8.33%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at $17.4 million and dropped off dramatically in the subsequent three years. Page 20 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2004. • Compared with calendar year 2012, 2013 collections have increased by $21,621 or 5.14%, • Collections peaked in 2012 at $490,004. Page 21 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2004. • Compared with calendar year 2012, 2013 collections have increased by $161,376 or 16.03%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and have since been gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstandinu (page 22) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value and the preliminary 2013 assessed value for 2014 property taxes is $7,170,874,227. Following the City's December 1, 2013, bond payment, the City currently has $7,435,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 6.91% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.38% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds, • The $7,435,000 of bonds the City currently has outstanding is part of the 2003 nonvoted (LTGO) bond issue. Of this amount: P.1FinancelFor City CounciliCouncil Monthly Repons1201312013 11.docx Page 3 o $5,990,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $1,445,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. P:1FinancelFor City Council\Councll Monthly Reports1201312013 11.docx Page 4 P:\Finance\For City Council/Council Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget r#001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 10,943,700 3,819,316 10,176,597 (767,103) 92.99% Sales Tax 15,250,000 1,439,321 13,817,462 (1,432,538) 90.61% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,280,000 122,371 1,129,239 (150,761) 88.22% Sates Tax-Public Safety 750,000 68,642 631,148 (118,852) 84.15% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 612,300 118,283 406,112 (206,188) 66.33% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,135,000 6,564 939,944 (195,056) 82.81% State Shared Revenues 1,684,600 0 1,344,571 (340,029) 79.82% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,632,300 124,284 1,291,345 (340,955) 79.11% Community Development 1,174,000 94,934 1,633,037 459,037 139.10% Recreation Program Fees 571,500 26,128 528,725 (42,775) 92.52% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 0 7,355 82,514 82,514 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 158,200 8,662 113,506 (44,694) 71.75% Transfer-in -#101 (street admin) 39,700 3,308 36,392 (3,308) 91.67% Transfer-in -#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0,00% Transfer-in -#402 (storrnadmin) 13,400 1,117 12,283 (1,117) 91.67% Total Recurring Revenues 35,274,700 5,840,286 32,142,872 (3,131,828) 91.12% Expenditures City Council 390,111 24,732 309,968 80,143 79.46% City Manager 637,984 49,614 548,003 89,981 85.90% Legal 474,161 29,123 393,288 80,873 82.94% Public Safety 22,139,200 1,778,748 19,494,930 2,644,270 88.06% Deputy City Manager 609,706 33,551 384,992 224,714 63.14% Finance 1,089,633 85,166 944,857 144,776 86.71% Human Resources 232,469 18,584 192,107 40,362 82.64% Public Works 876,443 58,494 594,680 281,763 67.85% Community Development-Administration 269,925 18,128 211,019 58,906 78.18% Community Development-Engineering 865,595 64,045 746,148 119,447 86.20% Community Development-Planning 912,493 73,776 890,320 22,173 97.57% Community Development-Building 1,175,332 76,397 925,878 249,454 78.78% Parks&Rec-Administration 270,717 19,038 227,635 43,082 84.09% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 789,000 63,166 641,245 147,755 81.27% Parks&Rec-Recreation 231,321 10,821 195,060 36,261 84.32% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 485,600 11,002 476,385 9,215 98.10% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 88,143 6,400 74,200 13,943 84.18% Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 800,884 50,299 693,783 107,101 86.63% Pavement Preservation 855,857 0 0 855,857 0.00% General Government 1,799,100 88,368 1,243,131 555,969 69.10% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 319,000 26,583 292,417 26,583 91.67% Total Recurring Expenditures 35,312,674 2,586,035 29,480,044 5,832,630 83.48% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (37,974) 3,254,251 2,662,829 2,700,803 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Transfer in-#120(excess reserves) 50,787 0 50,787 0 100.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 50,787 0 50,787 0 100.00% Expenditures Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 50,000 4,167 45,833 4,167 91.67% Transfers out-#312(Capital Reserve Fund) 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 100.00% Parks&Recreation Related 56,962 1,200 41,202 15,760 72.33% Carpet at City Hall 25,000 0 0 25,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 7,958,169 5,367 7,913,242 44,927 99.44% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (7,907,382) (5,367) (7,862,455) 44,927 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (7,945,356) 3,248,884 (5,199,626) 2,745,730 Beginning unrestrictedfund balance 28,801,231 28,801,231 Ending unrestricted fund balance 20,855,875 23,601,605 Page 5 P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures ,Elapsed= 91.7% ___ For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,861,100 133,441 1,561,612 (299,488) 83.91% Investment Interest 5,000 171 2,523 (2,477) 50.46% Insurance Premiums&Recoveries 0 0 633 633 #DIV/0! Utility Tax 2,900,000 205,599 2,136,678 (763,322) 73.68% Miscellaneous Revenue 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Recurring Revenues 4,766,100 339,212 3,701,446 (1,064,654) 77.66% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 573,170 41,529 526,515 46,655 91.86% Supplies 72,200 24,883 347,481 (275,281) 481.28% Services&Charges 2,925,152 249,430 2,113,820 811,332 72.26% Intergovernmental Payments 851,000 184,212 633,626 217,374 74.46% Interfund Transfers-out-#001 39,700 3,308 36,392 3,308 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#501 (plow replace.) 150,000 12,500 137,500 12,500 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#501 (non-plow vehicle 10,777 898 9,879 898 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#311 (pavement preserve 282,000 0 282,000 0 100.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,903,999 516,759 4,087,213 816,786 83.34% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures (137,899) (177,548) (385,767) (247,868) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY _J Revenues Grants 200,000 0 171,505 (28,495) 85.75% Interfund Transfers in-#302 0 0 26,815 26,815 #DIVJO! Miscellaneous 0 0 12,638 12,638 #DIVIO! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 200,000 0 210,957 10,957 105.48% Expenditures lnterfund Transfers-out-#303 0 0 138 (138) #DIV/0! 0133-Sprague/Sullivan ITS 200,000 0 199,505 495 99.75% Capital Outlay-Buildings&Structures 0 0 5,979 (5,979) #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 200,000 0 205,621 (5,621) 102.81% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures 0 0 5,336 5,336 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (137,899) (177,548) (380,431) (242,532) Beginning fund balance 2,228,437 2,228,437 Ending fund balance 2,090,538 1,848,006 Page 6 P:1FInancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 7,800 0 0 (7,800) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 3 44 44 #DIV/0! Total revenues 7,800 3 44 (7,756) 0.57% Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,800 3 44 (7,756) Beginning fund balance 63,941 63,941 - Ending fund balance 71,741 63,985 #105-HOTEL I MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 490,000 43,836 441,892 (48,108) 90.18% Investment Interest 500 32 311 (189) 62.29% Total revenues 490,500 43,867 442,203 (48,297) 90.15% Expenditures interfund Transfers-#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% City directed marketing efforts 55,000 0 3,123 51,877 5.68% Tourism Promotion 425,500 54,350 324,997 100,503 76.38% Total expenditures 510,500 54,350 328,120 182,380 64,27% Revenues over(under)expenditures (20,000) (10,483) 114,083 (230,677) Beginning fund balance 206,772 206,772 Ending fund balance 186,772 320,855 Page 7 P:IFlnancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Total revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Interfund Transfer-out-#001 50,787 0 50,787 (0) 100.00% Total expenditures 50,787 0 50,787 (0) 100.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (50,787) 0 (50,787) 0 Beginning fund balance 350,787 350,787 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 7,000 425 6,056 (944) 86.52% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Total revenues 7,000 425 6,056 (944) 86,52% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIV10? Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV10i Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,000 425 6,056 (944) Beginning fund balance 5,441,531 5,441,531 Ending fund balance 5,448,531 5,447,587 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 700 41 587 (113) 83.92% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DlVIOI Subtotal revenues 700 41 587 (113) 83.92% Expenditures Reserve for Winter Weather 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIVI01 Revenues over(under)expenditures 700 41 587 (113) Beginning fund balance 502,888 502,888 Ending fund balance 503,588 503,476 #123-CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,600 98 1,396 (204) 87.28% Interfund Transfer-#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Total revenues 1,600 98 1,396 (204) 87.28% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 0 616,284 0 100.00% Total expenditures 616,284 0 616,284 0 100.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (614,684) 98 (614,888) (204) Beginning fund balance 2,403,947 2,403,947 Ending fund balance 1,789,263 1,789,060 Page 8 P:1FinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 . Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 437,120 288,560 437,120 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer-in-#301 92,951 7,746 85,205 (7,746) 91.67% Interfund Transfer-in-#302 92,952 7,746 85,205 (7,747) 91.67% Total revenues 623,023 304,052 607,531 (15,492) 97.51% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 437,120 288,560 400,809 36,311 91.69% Debt Service Payments-Roads 185,903 150,451 170,672 15,231 91.81% Total expenditures 623,023 439,011 571,481 51,542 91.73% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (134,959) 36,050 (67,035) Beginning fund balance 0 _ 0 Ending fund balance 0 36,050 Page 9 P;1FinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports12013\2013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 j Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 500,000 59,683 629,845 129,845 125.97% Investment Interest 500 71 985 485 196.93% Interfund Transfer-in-#303 0 0 0 0 #DIV111 Total revenues 500,500 59,754 630,829 130,329 126.04% Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#204 92,951 7,746 85,205 7,746 91.67% Interfund Transfer-out-#303 892,404 0 459,768 432,636 51.52% Interfund Transfer-out-#311 (pavementpresen, 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Total expenditures 1,135,355 7,746 694,974 440,381 61.21% Revenues over(under)expenditures (634,855) 52,008 (64,145) (310,052) Beginning fund balance 1,092,264 1,092,264 Ending fund balance 457,409 1,028,119 #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 500,000 58,123 538,052 38,052 107.61% Investment Interest 1,000 82 1,172 172 117.20% Interfund Transfer-in-#307 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 501,000 58,205 539,224 38,224 107.63% Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#101 0 0 26,815 (26,815) #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-out-#204 92,952 7,746 85,205 7,747 91.67% Interfund Transfer-out-#303 617,479 0 147,899 469,580 23.95% Interfund Transfer-out-#311 (pavement preset), 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Total expenditures _ 860,431 7,746 409,919 450,512 47.64% Revenues over(under)expenditures (359,431) 50,459 129,305 (412,287) Beginning fund balance 1,130,670 1,130,670 Ending fund balance 771,239 1,259,975 Page 10 P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 " 1 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 6,597,842 0 2,176,825 (4,421,017) 32.99% Developer Contribution 0 0 0 0 #D1V/0? Miscellaneous 0 0 49 49 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-in-#101 0 0 138 138 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-in-#301 892,404 0 459,768 (432,636) 51.52% Interfund Transfer-in-#302 617,479 0 147,899 (469,580) 23.95% Interfund Transfer-in-#311 0 0 76,857 76,857 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-in-#312 18,000 0 7,213 (10,787) 40.07% Investment Interest 0 2 24 24 #DIV/0! Total revenues 8,125,725 2 2,868,774 (5,256,951) 35.30% Expenditures 005 Pines/Mansfield,Wilbur Rd.to Pines 300,000 0 228,301 71,699 76.10% 053 24th Ave-Sullivan to 22nd 0 0 815 (815) #DIV/0! 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 957,892 320 27,845 930,047 2.91% 061 Pines(SR27) ITS Imporvement SRTC 06-26 637,288 397 992,795 (355,507) 155.78% 063 Broadway Ave Safety Project-Pines 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 065 Sprague/Sullivan 0 0 0 0 #DJV/0! 069 Park Road Reconstruction#2 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0l 106 West Ponderosa STEP 0 0 236 (236) #DIV/0! 112 Indiana Avenue Extension 0 0 3,877 (3,877) #DIVIO! 113 Indiana/Sullivan PCC Intersection 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 115 Sprague Ave Resurfacing-Evergreen to Sullivan 188,745 0 11,799 176,946 6.25% 123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker 127,500 83 5,647 121,853 4.43% 141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC 139,332 0 0 139,332 0.00% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 219,599 1,313 71,567 148,032 32.59% 145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 200,000 0 429 199,571 0.21% 146 24th Ave Sidewalk-Adams to Sullivan 15,000 50 270,962 (255,962) 1806.42% 148 Greenacres Trail-Design 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 149 Sidewalk Infll 337,507 202 176,151 161,356 52.19% 150 Sullivan Road Bridge Drain Retrofit 0 0 977 (977) #DIV/0! 151 Green Haven STEP 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 154 Sidewalk&Tansit Stop Accessibility 33,198 146 418 32,780 1,26% 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 800,000 192,941 765,041 34,959 95,63% 156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 1,012,924 7,449 103,826 909,098 10.25% 157 Temporary Sullivan Bridge Repairs 0 0 0 0 #DIVl0! 159 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study 125,000 83 145,901 (20,901) 116.72% 160 Evergreen Rd Pres, 16th-32nd 0 0 1,069 (1,069) #DIV/0! 166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave. Int. Safety 98,100 4,432 22,555 75,545 22.99% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 450,995 0 1,722 449,273 0.38% 168 Wellesley Ave Sidewalk&Adams Rd Sidewalk 554,500 362,979 703,436 (148,936) 126.86% 169 Argonne/Mullan Safety Indiana-Broadway 104,460 6,205 47,543 56,917 45.51% 170 Argonne road: Empire Ave-Knox Ave. 172,785 166 106,794 65,991 61.81% 171 Sprague Ave ADA Curb Ramp Project 110,400 0 95,604 14,796 86.60% 175 Sullivan UP Tracks UC(SB)Resurfacing 0 13,769 175,386 (175,386) #DIV/0! 176 Appleway Trail 150,000 0 57,053 92,947 38.04% 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 100,000 3,117 33,301 66,699 33.30% 181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 150,000 17,934 66,163 83,837 44,11% 185 Appleway Landscaping-Phase 1 18,000 646 8,246 9,754 45,81% 191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 0 3,433 3,433 (3,433) #DIV/0! Contingency 1,122,500 0 0 1,122,500 0.00% Total expenditures 8,125,725 615,665 4,128,889 3,996,836 50.81% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (615,663) (1,260,115) (9,253,788) Beginning fund balance 177,918 177,918 Ending fund balance 177,918 (1,082,197) Page 11 P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncii Monthly Reports1201322013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-in-#001 50,000 4,167 45,833 (4,167) 91.67% Interfund Transfer-in-#304 0 0 0 0 #DIV/O? Investment Interest 0 40 573 573 #DIV/0! Contributions and Donations 0 0 25,000 25,000 #DIV/0! Total revenues 50,000 4,207 71,406 21,406 142.81% Expenditures Capital 50,000 0 9,131 40,869 18.26% Total expenditures 50,000 0 9,131 40,869 18.26% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 4,207 62,276 (19,463) Beginning fund balance 302,423 302,423 Ending fund balance 302,423 364,698 Page 12 P:1Finance\For City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS -continued #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Investment Interest 0 108 1,538 1,538 #DIVIOI Total revenues 0 108 1,538 1,538 #DIV10! Expenditures Capital-West Gateway at Thierman-final pmt 0 0 3,629 (3,629) #DIVIO! Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 3,629 (3,629) #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 108 (2,090) 5,167_ Beginning fund balance 1,110,074 1,110,074 Ending fund balance 1,110,074 1,107,984 #311 -STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+ Revenues Grant Proceeds 165,793 0 35,261 (130,532) 21.27% Miscellaneous 0 0 50 50 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfers in-#101 282,000 0 282,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in-#123 616,284 0 616,284 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in-#301 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in-#302 150,000 0 150,000 0 100.00% Investment Interest 0 168 2,390 2,390 #DIV/0! Total revenues 1,364,077 168 1,235,985 (128,092) 90.61% Expenditures 162 2012 Street Preservation 0 0 9,561 (9,561) #DIV/0! 174 2013 Street Preservation Ph1 0 13 1,066,160 (1,066,160) #DIVIO! 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 0 (6,058) 54,692 (54,692) #DIVIDI 180 2013 Street Preservation Ph3 0 5,473 351,711 (351,711) #DIVID! 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 0 1,732 6,255 (6,255) #DIV/0! 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 0 4,784 (4,784) #DIV/0! Pavement Preservation 2,048,456 0 0 2,0481456 100.00% Transfers out-#303 0 0 76,857 (76,857) #DIV/0! Total expenditures 2,048,456 1,160 1,570,019 478,437 76.64% Revenues over(under)expenditures (684,379) (992) (334,034) (606,529) Beginning fund balance 948,733 948,733 Ending fund balance 264,354 614,698 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 7,826,207 0 7,826,207 0 100.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Developer Contribution 0 0 3,180 3,180 #DIVIO! Total revenues 7,826,207 0 7,829,367 3,180 100.04% Expenditures Business Route Signage 60,000 0 0 60,000 0.00% Balfour Park I Library Site Development 42,150 6,827 45,701 (3,551) 106.43% Transfers out-#303-Appleway Landscaping 18,000 0 7,213 10,787 40.07% Total expenditures 120,150 6,827 52,914 67,236 44.04% Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,706,057 (6,827) 7,776,473 (64,056) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 7,706,057 7,776,473 Page 13 P:IFinancelFor City Council\Council Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November30 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,800,000 639,440 1,732,126 (67,874) 96.23% Investment Interest 1,800 121 1,731 (69) 96.15% Miscellaneous 0 0 4,143 4,143 #DIV/0! Total Recurring Revenues 1,801,800 639,562 1,738,000 (63,800) 96.46% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 475,604 33,161 396,509.67 79,094 83.37% Supplies 16,300 691 9,187 7,113 56.36% Services&Charges 1,131,120 122,975 1,015,892 115,228 89.81% Intergovernmental Payments 23,000 0 12,650 10,351 55.00% Interfund Transfers-out-#001 13,400 1,117 12,283 1,117 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#502 1,567 131 1,436 131 91.66% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,660,991 158,075 1,447,957 213,034 87.17% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 140,809 481,486 290,042 149,233 [NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 200,000 5,034 69,648 (130,352) 34.82% Interfund Transfers-in 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 200,000 5,034 69,648 (130,352) 34.82% Expenditures Capital-various projects 350,000 0 197,358 152,642 56,39% Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit 267,000 139,000 159,089 107,911 59.58% UlC Retrofits on Pvmnt Pres Projects 430,000 6,230 168,713 261,287 39.24% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,047,000 145,230 525,160 521,840 50.16% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures _ (847,000) (140,196) (455,512) 391,488 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (706,191) 341,290 (165,469) 540,722 Beginning working capital 2,697,333 2,697,333 - Ending working capital 1,991,142 2,531,864 Page 14 P:\FinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reporis1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 234,336 (265,664) 46.87% Grant DOE-Decant Facility 735,000 203,609 203,609 (531,391) 27.70% Grant DOT-Decant Facility 150,000 0 85,221 (64,779) 56.81% Grant DOE-Sprague UIC Elimination 610,331 (0) 570,331 (40,000) 93.45% Investment Interest 1,000 0 0 (1,000) 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 150 150 #DIV/OI Total revenues 1,996,331 203,609 1,093,648 (902,683) 54.78% Expenditures Sprague swales 40,000 24,796 322,243 (282,243) 805.61% 14th Ave Custer to Carnahan 300,000 187,044 324,348 (24,348) 108.12% Bettman-Dickey Storm drain 250,000 0 195,823 54,177 78.33% Decant Facility 980,000 0 289,824 690,176 29.57% Total expenditures 1,570,000 211,840 1,132,237 437,763 72.12% Revenues over(under)expenditures 426,331 (8,231) (38,590) (1,340,446) Beginning working capital (108,658) (108,658) Ending working capital 317,673 (147,247) Page 15 P:FinancelFor City Council\Council Monthly Reports 12013\2013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2013 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2013 2013 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Interfund Transfer-in-#001 15,400 1,283 14,117 (1,283) 91.67% Interfund Transfer-in-#101 10,777 898 9,879 (898) 91.67% Interfund Transfer-in-#101 (plow replace.) 150,000 12,500 137,500 (12,500) 91.67% Interfund Transfer-in-#402 1,567 131 1,436 (131) 91.67% Investment Interest 1,000 72 1,022 22 102.16% Total revenues 178,744 14,884 163,954 (14,790) 91.73% Expenditures Computer replacement lease 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Software/Hardware replacement 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Vehicle Replacement 50,000 0 48,749 1,251 97.50% Snow Plow Replacement 0 0 0 0 #DIV/O! Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV/O! Total expenditures 50,000 0 48,749 1,251 97.50% Revenues over(under)expenditures 128,744 14,884 115,204 (16,041) Beginning working capital 1,053,177 1,053,177 Ending working capital 1,181,921 1,168,382 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 6 6 #DIV10! Interfund Transfer-#001 319,000 26,583 292,417 (26,583) 91.67% Total revenues 319,000 26,584 292,423 (26,577) 91.67% Expenditures Services&Charges 319,000 0 271,183 47,817 85.01% Total expenditures 319,000 0 271,183 47,817 85.01% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 26,584 21,240 (74,395) Beginning working capital 83,212 83,212 Ending working capital 83,212 104,452 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 64,285,594 7,540,099 53,698,697 Per revenue status report 64,285,594 7,540,099 53,698,697 Difference 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 67,162,544 4,755,811 53,547,553 Per expenditure status report 67,162,544 4,755,811 53,547,553 0.00 0.00 0.00 Page 16 P;IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA I 12/11/2013 Investment Report For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2013 Total LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments Beginning $ 40,121,657.91 $ 3,053,906.19 $ 2,004,331.38 $ 45,179,895.48 Deposits 1,815,953.82 0.00 0.00 1,815,953.82 Withdrawls 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest 3,851.15 0.00 1,465.08 5,316.23 Ending $ 41,941,462.88 $ 3,053,906.19 $ 2,005,796.46 $ 47,001,165.53 matures: 6/28/2014 11/4/2013 rate: 0.35% 0.29% Earnings Balance Current Period Year to date Budget 001 General Fund $ 29,185,802.93 $ 3,881.08 $ 53,006.85 $ 90,000.00 101 Street Fund 2,089,280.04 171.19 2,522.77 5,000.00 103 Trails & Paths 37,961.21 3.11 44.31 0.00 105 Hotel/Motel 385,552.18 31.59 311.47 500.00 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,188,799.06 425.16 6,056.14 7,000.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve 503,305.69 41.24 587.44 700.00 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 1,196,426.65 98.03 1,396.42 1,600.00 301 Capital Projects 867,511.95 71.08 984.67 500.00 302 Special Capital Projects 1,004,097.08 82.27 1,171.95 1,000.00 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 22,839.51 1,87 24.06 0.00 304 Mirabeau Point Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 307 Capital Grants Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309 Parks Capital Project 490,951.28 40.23 573.03 0.00 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 1,317,895.01 107.98 1,538.20 0.00 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 2,047,592.50 167.77 2,389.87 0.00 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 402 Stormwater Management 1,482,778.45 121.49 1,730.65 1,800.00 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 875,273.42 71.72 1,021.59 1,000.00 502 Risk Management 5,098.57 0.42 5.97 0.00 $ 47,001,165.53 $ 5,316.23 $ 73,365.39 $ 110,100.00 *Local Government Investment Pool Page 17 P:IFinancelFor City CouncillCouncil Monthly Reports1201312013 11 30 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 12/11/2013 Sales Tax Receipts For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2013 Month Difference Received 2012 2013 $ February 1,792,084.16 1,876,298.24 84,214,08 4.70% March 1,145,747.45 1,279,426.01 133,678.56 11.67% April 1,208,053.80 1,295,166.24 87,112.44 7.21% May 1,440,245,01 1,531,483.94 91,238.93 6.33% June 1,325,266.87 1,486,879.22 161,612.35 12.19% July 1,458,841.23 1,568,524.87 109,683.64 7.52% August 1,482,908.83 1,612,535.63 129,626.80 8.74% September 1,470,215.17 1,646,673.39 176,458.22 12.00% October 1,558,848.71 1,650,525.59 91,676.88 5.88% November 1,541,210.69 1,630,334.91 89,124.22 5.78% 14,423,421,92 15,577,848.04 1,154,428.12 8.00% December 1,523,377.53 0.00 January 1,490,932.65 0.00 17,437,732.10 15,577,848.04 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 8.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Crminial Justice 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0,10% - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 18 L 12/3/2013 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Sales Tax Collections- October For the years 2004 through 2013 11SV-FS21UserslmcalhounlTax RevenuelSales Tax1201312013 sales tax collections 2004 I 2005 1 2006 ! 2007 2008 I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 ) 2012 I 2013 January 1,145,888 February 962,431 March 909,472 April 1,080,745 May 1,263,176 June 1,123,171 July 1,301,359 August 1,162,356 September 1,160,787 October 1,274,680 1,367,929 917,747 1,015,573 1,322,070 1,159,647 1,212,663 1,377,753 1,395,952 1,372,081 1,520,176 1,572,609 1,068,743 1,072,330 1,371,030 1,392,111 1,362,737 1,555,124 1,405,983 1,487,155 1,526,910 1,759,531 1,155,947 1,196,575 1,479,603 1,353,013 1,428,868 1,579,586 1,516,324 1,546,705 1,601,038 1,729,680 1,129,765 1,219,611 1,423,459 1,243,259 1,386,908 1,519,846 1,377,943 1,364,963 1,344,217 1,484,350 1,098,575 1,068,811 1,134,552 1,098,054 1,151,772 1,309,401 1,212,531 1,227,813 1,236,493 1,491,059 963,749 1,018,468 1,184,137 1,102,523 1,123,907 1,260,873 1,211,450 1,191,558 1,269,505 1,460,548 990,157 1,01 5.762 1,284,180 1,187,737 1,248,218 1,332,834 1,279,500 1,294,403 1,291,217 1,589,887 1,009,389 1,067,733 1,277,621 1,174,962 1,290,976 1,302,706 1,299,678 1,383,123 1,358,533 1,671,269 1,133,347 1,148,486 1,358,834 1,320,449 1,389,802 1,424,243 1,465,563 1,466,148 1,439,321 2013 to 2012 Difference 81,382 5.12% 123,958 12.28% 80,753 7.56% 81,213 6.36% 145,487 12.38% 98,826 7.66% 121,537 9.33% 165,885 12.76% 83,025 6.00% 80,788 5.95% Collected to date 11,384,065 12,661,591 13,814,732 14,617,190 13,739,651 12,022,352 11,817,229 12,384,556 12,754,608 13,817,462 1,062,854 8.33% November 1,091,721 1,095,566 1,369,940 1,443,843 1,292,327 1,155,647 1,139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 0 December 1,085,827 1,286,191 1,366,281 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1,141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 0 Total Collections 13,561,613 15,043,348 16,550,953 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 13,817,462 Budget Estimate 11,000,000 12,280,000 16,002,000 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 Actual over(under)budg 2,561,613 2,763,348 548,953 (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 (1,432,538) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 123.29% 122.50% 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% n/a %change in annual total collected 71.77% 10.93% 10.02% 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% n/a %of budget collected through October 103.49% 103.11% 86.33% 83.69% 80.27% 67.31% 82.01% 87.15% 89.76% 90.61% %of actual total collected through October 83.94% 84.17% 83.47% 83.83% 85.02% 84.38% 83.83% 83.40% 82.68% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October Page 19 16,000,000 14,000,000 October September 12,000,000 - August July June 10,000,000 - 8,000,000 6,000,000 May 4,000,000 m April 2,000,000 2,000,000 March 0 0 February •January 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 , Page 19 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- October Actual for the years 2004 through 2013 11SV-FS21Userslmcalhoun\Tax RevenuelLodging Tax12 0 1 311 0 5 hotel motel tax 2013 2004 I 2005 I 2006 2007 2008 I 2009 2010 I 2011 2012 ] 2013 January 16,993.58 February 18,161.04 March 18,182.01 April 26,897.82 May 16,440.37 June 53,284.01 July 42,120.26 August 43,649.84 September 39,390.66 October 33,004.62 20,691.03 19,976.81 22,828.15 29,748.41 29,017.66 35,330.35 43,841.82 46,852.10 46,746.18 34,966.85 20,653.49 20,946.09 24,308.48 34,371.82 32,522.06 34,256.71 49,744.62 45,916.16 50,126.53 38,674.17 25,137.92 25,310.66 29,19035 37,950.53 31,371.01 36,267.07 56,281.99 51,120.70 57,260.34 43,969.74 28,946.96 24,623.06 27,509.99 40,406.02 36,828.53 46,659.88 50,421.37 50,818.35 60,711.89 38,290.46 23,280.21 23,283.95 25,272.02 36,253.63 32,588.80 40,414.59 43,950.26 50,146.56 50,817.62 36,784.36 22,706.96 23,416.94 24,232.35 39,463.49 34,683.32 39,93536 47,385.18 54,922.99 59,418.96 41,27235 22,212.21 22,792.14 24,611.28 38,230.49 33,790.69 41,403.41 49,311.97 57,451.68 58,908.16 39,028.08 21,44232 21,548.82 25,654.64 52,130.37 37,478.44 43,970.70 52,818.60 57,229.23 64,298.70 43,698.90 [12/2/2013 2013 to 2012 Difference $ % 24,184.84 2,743 12.79% 25,974.98 4,426 20.54% 27,738.65 2,084 8i2% 40,979.25 (11,151) (21.39%) 40,560.41 3,082 8.22% 47,850.15 3,879 8.82% 56,157.26 3,339 6.32% 63,816.45 6,587 11.51% 70,794.09 6,495 10.10% 43,835.57 137 031% Total Collections 308,124,21 329,999.36 351,520.13 393,860.31 405,216.51 362,792.00 387,437.90 387,740.11 420,270.72 441,891.65 November 32,176.61 26,089.36 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34.329,78 37,339.36 39,301.22 0.00 December 23,142.70 31,740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 0.00 Total Collections 363,443.52 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 441,891.65 Budget Estimate 380,000.00 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000-00 480,000.00 430,000.00 490,000.00 Actual over(under)budg (16,556.48) (48,998.10) 67.084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544,52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 (48,108.35) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 95.64% 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% n/a %change in annual total collected 41.34% 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% n/a %of budget collected through October %of actual total collected through October 81.09% 75.54% 100.43% 98.47% 101.30% 70.86% 101.96% 80.78% 97.74% 90.18% 84.78% 85.09% 84.28% 85.33% 86.75% 85.57% 86.38% 84.73% 85.77% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 21,621 5.14% 500,000.00 October September 450,000.00 400,000.00 - - 350,000.00 300,000.00 250,000.00 - ---. - August July June -May „ 200,000.00 150,000.00 - - al April ts March 100,000.00 50,000.00 a, a February 0.00 - e January 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Page 20 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 1st and 2nd 1/4%REET Collections through October Actual for the years 2004 through 2013 11SV-FS21 Users lmcalhoun\Tax Revenue\REET12 0 1 313 0 1 and 302 REET for 2013 2004 I 2005 I 2006 I 2007 I 2008 I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 1 2012 I 2013 1 January 119,387.05 February 83,795.78 March 195,121.93 April 144.167.21 May 155,089.15 June 177,702.06 July 197,046.43 August 171,521.07 September 176,002.43 October 199,685.81 147,819.56 128,082.35 198,013.09 192,012.44 240,765.59 284,268.67 209,350.53 280,881.50 214,738.94 244,590.31 243,894.16 172,154.72 182,065.71 173,796.61 306,871.66 226,526.64 2,104.30 451,700.06 188,066.23 211,091.20 228,896.76 129,919.79 263,834.60 211,787.08 222,677.17 257 477.05 323,945.47 208,039.87 165,287.21 206 442.92 145,963.47 159,503.34 133,513.35 128,366.69 158,506.43 178,202.98 217,942.98 133,905,93 131,240.36 355,655.60 55,281.25 45,180.53 73,306.86 81,155.83 77,463.58 105,020.98 122,530.36 115,829.68 93,862.17 113,960.52 59,887.08 64,121.61 86,204.41 99,507.19 109,624.89 105,680.28 84,834.48 72,630.27 75,812.10 93,256.02 64,128.13 36443.36 95.879.78 79,681.38 124,691.60 81,579.34 79,629.06 129,472.44 68,019.83 61,396.23 46,358.75 56,114.56 71.729.67 86,537.14 111,627.22 124,976.28 101,048.69 106,517.19 63,516.73 238,094.79 56,898.40 155,226.07 72,171.53 90,376.91 116,164.91 139,112.11 128,921.02 117,149.90 174,070.25 117,805.76 Collected to date 1,619,518.92 2,140,522.98 2.158,271.29 2,218,307.92 1,742,801.13 883,591.76 851,558.33 820,921.15 1,006,521.02 1,167,896.86 November 217,019.02 190,964.73 141,729.09 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 0.00 December 173,502.55 159,381.40 161,285.23 179,567.77 96,086.00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077.29 74,299.65 0.00 Total distributed by Spokane County 2,010.040.49 2,490.869.11 2,461,285.61 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185,706.66 1,167,896.86 Budget estimate 1,680,000.00 4,006,361.00 2.000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 Actual over(under)budget 330,040.49 (1.515,491.89) 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 167,896.86 Total actual collections as a%of total budget 119.65% 62.17% 123.06% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% n/a change in annual total collected %of budget collected through October of actual total collected through October 50.25% 23.92% (1.19%) 5.22% (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% n/a 96.40% 53.43% 107.91% 110.92% 87.14% 44.18% 112.05% 102.62% 105.95% 116.79% 80.57% 85.93% 87.69% 85.66% 87.72% 81.20% 88.49% 85.45% 84.89% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 12/3/2013 2013 to 2012 Difference S n� 10,540 22.73% 99,112 176.62% 442 0.62% 3,840 4.44% 4,538 4.07% 14,136 11.31% 27,872 27.58% 10,633 9.98% 110,554 174.05% (120,289) (50.52%) 161,376 16.03% e 21 2,500,000.00 October 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 September August - - July June May April -March 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 -- - -- -, February °January 0.00 2004 --,- 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2032 2013 e 21 \\SV-FS2\Users\mcalhoun\Bonds\debt capacity CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 11/20/2013 Debt Capacity 2013 Assessed Value for 2014 Property Taxes 7,170,874,227 (these represnet preliminary figures as of 11/13/13) Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt % Capacity 12/31/2013 i Capacity Utilized Voted (UTGO) 1.00% of assessed value 71,708,742 0 71,708,742 0.00% Nonvoted (LTGO) 1,50% of assessed value 107,563,113 7,435,000 100,128,113 6.91% Voted park 2.50% of assessed value 179,271,856 0 179,271,856 0.00% Voted utility 2.50% of assessed value 179,271,856 0 179,271,856 0.00% 537,815,567 7,435,000 j 530,380,567 1.38% I 2003 LTGO Bonds \ Road & Fl Period Street Ending CenterPlace Improvements _ Total - 12/1/2004 60,000 85,080 145,000 12/1/2005 75,000 90,000 165,000 12/1/2006 85,000 90,00 175,000 Bonds 12/1/2007 90,000 95,00 185,000 Repaid 12/1/2008 95,000 95,00 190,000 12/1/2009 105,000 100,00 205,000 12/1/2010 110,000 100,000 210,000 12/1/2011 120,000 105,000 225,000 12/1/2012 130,000 110,000 240,000 12/1/2013 140,000 115,000 255,000 1,010,000 985,000 1,995,000 12/1/2014 150,000 120,000 270,000 12/1/2015 160,000 125,000 285,000 12/1/2016 170,000 130,000 300,000 12/1/2017 180,000 135,000 315,000 12/1/2018 220,000 140,000 360,000 12/1/2019 250,000 145,000 395,000 12/1/2020 290,000 150,000 440,000 12/1/2021 325,000 160,000 485,000 Bonds 12/1/2022 360,000 165,000 525,000 Remaining 12/1/2023 405,000 175,000 580,000 12/1/2024 450,000 0 450,000 12/1/2025 490,000 0 490,000 12/1/2026 535,000 0 535,000 12/1/2027 430,000 0 430,000 12/1/2028 340,000 0 340,000 12/1/2029 295,000 0 295,000 12/1/2030 280,000 0 280,000 12/1/2031 240,000 0 240,000 12/1/2032 190,000 0 190,000 12/1/2033 230,000 0 230,000 5,990,000 1,445,000 7,435,000 7,000,000 2,430,000 9,430,000 Page 22 MEMO TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: December 30, 2013 RE: Monthly Report November 2013 November 2013: November 2012: CAD incidents: 4,413 CAD incidents: 4,495 Reports taken: 1,707 Reports taken: 1,785 Traffic stops: 945 Traffic stops: 1,087 Traffic reports: 307 Traffic reports: 326 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing November residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the November Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For example, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake area to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief VanLeuven once again participated in the Annual Hope House Fashion Show in early November. He joined Sheriff Knezovich along with other law enforcement and local personalities to raise funds for an organization that supports a great need in this community. In the late 90's, a serial murderer preyed on vulnerable Spokane women, particularly homeless women with complicated mental-health and substance-abuse histories. At the time, there was no safe place for these women to go, until concerned citizens formed Hope House (then known as the Downtown Women's Shelter). Each year since then, their Fashion Show tells the story. Their star models are always local law enforcement officials, in tribute to those who stopped the murders and continue to work tirelessly on behalf of Hope House. Historically, the celebrity roster has also included media and sports personalities. Chief VanLeuven was on call the second week in November. The following week, he and Sheriff Knezovich attended the Semi-Annual Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs Conference at Lake Chelan. Page 1 Mid-November brought the Annual Law Enforcement and SCOPE Banquet. The following awards were presented to Spokane Valley Police deputies: LIFE SAVING AWARD: Corporal James W. Speaks and Deputy Darell R. Stidham In recognition of your swift response and actions during a drowning incident on the Spokane River. Your dedication and commitment to the citizens of this community are extraordinary. You are valued members of our TEAM!! Thank you! MEDAL OF VALOR:Deputy Jared S. Kiehn and Deputy Kenneth A. Dodge In recognition of your extraordinary efforts in trying to save a person's life by extinguishing a car fire,placing yourself in great personal jeopardy, you displayed the highest form of commitment and dedication to the citizens of our community. It is an honor to work with you and have you as part of our TEAM. Thank you! MEDAL OF MERIT: Deputy Gregory A. Snyder In recognition of your extraordinary 18 years of service in the Crime Prevention Unit! Your professionalism and willingness to embrace change are among the attributes that have made you a successful Crime Prevention Deputy. You actively supported the mission, values, and ethics of the Sheriffs Office at every opportunity. It is an honor to have you as a member of our TEAM. Thank you! SHERIFF'S STAR AWARD:Deputy Todd Miller Your keen observation skills, dedication and commitment to the safety of our citizens have led to the significant decline of intoxicated/impaired drivers on the streets of Spokane County! Thank you for being a valued member part of our TEAM!! COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING: SCOPE volunteers participated in the following events during the month of November: • Fall Free Spokane Coalition Meeting • Safe Kids Meeting • Spokane Crime Stoppers Meeting • GSSAC Coalition • Operation Family ID • 12th Annual S.C.O.P.E. & Law Enforcement Appreciation Banquet John Baldwin, who was presented with the "Spirit of - S.C.O.P.E." award at this year's Law Enforcement and SCOPE Appreciation Banquet on + " November 12th, passed away November 16th after battling ` �` cancer. John was frequently at the 1110072711 ;, , , • Valley Precinct, chatting with his other volunteer buddies, following up on graffiti reports, looking for Chief VanLeuven to get an article for the SCOPE newsletter, or joking around with detectives and deputies about anything and everything. John loved working with SCOPE as he helped direct traffic at crime scenes, worked with property owners to clean up graffiti, or simply drove the SCOPE Patrol car through neighborhoods, Page 2 being a presence to the public. We all enjoyed working with John and will greatly miss his smile around the precinct and in our community. November 2013 Volunteers Hours per station: Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 12 457.5 101.0 558.5 Edgecliff 22 387.0 10.0 397.0 Trentwood 6 169.0 99.0 268.0 University 25 532.0 120.5 652.5 TOTALS 65 1545.5 330.5 1,876.0 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $40,559.12 for November 2013 The Latent Fingerprint Team was dispatched to a total of 73 incidents during the month of November; 50 of those incidents were located within Spokane Valley. Year-to-date, the team has responded to 724 incidents within Spokane County; 424 of those incidents were in Spokane Valley. S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT)volunteers contributed 74 on-scene hours (including travel time) in November, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 19 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. There were no Special Event hours for Spokane Valley in November. Total November volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 510; year-to-date total is 6,215 hours. November was a relatively busy month. We have a couple of new trainees that look pretty good and we just certified another for regular duty. Unfortunately, one of our members ended up with a new full time job whose time requirements conflict with continued SIRT participation. We're working on the new members on a fast track to certification. S.C.O.P.E. DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley #of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 6 123 22 0 0 February 4 83 11 0 0 March 7 147.5 36 0 0 April 8 160 28 0 0 May 4 86 4 0 0 June 4 129 26 0 0 July 2 55.5 8 0 0 August 4 86 22 0 0 September 6 88 18 0 0 October 5 46 6 0 0 November 6 112 18 0 0 Total 56 1,836 199 0 0 Page 3 Spokane County # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 2 2 0 0 0 February 2 6 0 0 0 March 3 31 0 0 0 April 3 24 5 0 0 May 1 11 0 0 0 June 0 0 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 0 0 0 0 0 September 2 9 0 3 0 October 4 33 2 0 0 November 3 11 0 0 0 Total 20 127 7 3 0 Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in October totaled 16 and in November 16 with 7 vehicles in October and 5 in November, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Thirty-seven hulks were processed in October and 13 hulks processed in November. During the month of November, a total of 56 vehicles were processed; the total for 2013 to date is 730. OPERATIONS: Two Burglaries, One Vehicle Prowling In Same Neighborhood — In early November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Cindy Jones responded to a residential burglary call near the 14200 block of East Broadway. The homeowner's daughter told Deputy Jones that the previous night, at about 11:40 p.m., she took her friend home. She said she left the garage door open because her mother was awake working on a puzzle in her bedroom. She said she returned home at about 12:25 a.m., entered through the garage, closed the door and went inside. When her mother woke up the next morning she saw her purse was missing from the chair she keeps it on next to the door leading out to the garage. The victim cancelled her credit card and found out it had been used at a convenience store in Liberty Lake at about 5:00 a.m. that morning. While investigating this residential burglary, dispatch advised Deputy Jones there was a purse found near the area of the initial residential burglary. She contacted the complainant who said he was out looking for his daughter's wallet as it had been stolen a couple nights ago from her vehicle. This purse did not belong to her initial victim, but as a result of this call, Deputy Jones determined there was a vehicle prowling and another residential burglary near the victim's residence of her initial investigation. The other residential burglary took place sometime the prior evening between 3:00 and 8:00 p.m. The victim said he had left his wallet inside his house next to the garage door and it was stolen. He also said his garage door was left open. This is another reminder to citizens to make sure not to leave their garage doors open whether or not they are at home. The Sheriffs Office encourages citizens to continue to report suspicious persons, vehicles and activity to Crime Check at 509-456-2233. Page 4 K9 Jet Locates Robbery Suspect — In early November, mid-morning, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to Safeway at 1441 N. Argonne on a robbery call. A Loss Prevention Officer told deputies he observed an 18-year-old male subject place a bottle of Tequila in his pants. When he confronted the suspect, the suspect struck the Loss Prevention Officer on the head with the bottle and ran north from the store. Several deputies set up containment and Deputy Bob Bond and his K9 partner Jet searched for the suspect. Within minutes of starting the track, Jet located the suspect inside a waiting room at a business complex located at 8817 E. Mission. Deputy Bond saw the suspect sitting inside the waiting area and saw he matched the suspect description. When Deputy Bond asked the assistant if she knew who the male suspect was, she said she did not. She said the suspect had just walked in and was asking people for a ride. The male suspect was positively identified by the Loss Prevention Officer and booked into jail on the felony charge of Robbery as well as an unrelated felony warrant. Attempted Residential Burglary— In early November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Ken Dodge responded to an attempted residential burglary call near the area of 1600 S. Limerick Road. Deputy Dodge contacted the homeowner who said she returned home at 2:30 p.m., opened her garage door and saw the spare key to her garage door leading into the house in the door handle. She said only her family members know where the key is hidden and has no idea who would have entered the residence. Deputy Dodge and Cpl. Wakefield confirmed there was nobody inside the residence before the homeowner checked for anything missing. She did not find anything missing or out of place and it was determined she more than likely scared the suspect(s) off when she opened the garage door. Since there was no damage to the back door leading into the garage, it appears the suspect(s) entered through the "doggy door." Spokane Valley Police urge citizens to ensure their "doggy doors" are only big enough to accommodate their pet. Oversized doors offer the opportunity for the criminal element to enter either your garage or residence. Citizens are also encouraged to set up a Neighborhood Block Watch program in their neighborhoods. If interested, contact Deputy Chris Johnston at 477-3291. Residential and Commercial Wiring Stolen — In mid-November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Chan Erdman responded to a commercial burglary call near the 2200 block of North Woodruff Road. Deputy Erdman contacted the business owner who told him that sometime overnight, more than 1600 feet of copper wire was taken outside the business. The wire was the main power lines for two suites in the complex. Estimated cost for replacement is $6,576.00. The same day, Deputy Greg Snyder contacted the manager for a vacant residence in the 4900 block of East Second who said the residence was completely stripped of all electrical wiring. This included wiring to the electrical panel, appliances, water heater and furnace. The garage also had all the wiring stripped. Estimated cost for replacement and repairs is several thousand dollars. In late November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Wade Nelson responded to a residential burglary near the 7300 block of East Mission Road. Deputy Nelson contacted the property manager who said sometime within the past two months, the vacant residence was broken into. The manager said the suspect(s) stole copper pipe and wiring throughout the residence, including inside the walls of the home. The property manager estimated the damage at or near $10,000. The manager also said he has had at least 20 homes broken into over the past few months; the homes have ranged from low-priced homes to others worth over $400,000. Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in these incidents. Persons with information should call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line at 1-800-222-TIPS, or should forward the tip via the Internet website www.crimestoppersinlandnorthwest.org. Tipsters do not have to give their name to collect the cash reward. Page 5 Hit And Run Suspect Rams Patrol Vehicle—In the early morning hours in mid-November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies Byron Zlateff and Mark Brownell responded to a possible alarm call at 8201 E. Sprague Ave. After Deputy Brownell arrived on scene he heard a loud crash. Deputy Brownell saw a Buick Lesabre with damage to the trunk, traveling westbound on Sprague and had Deputy Zlateff check on the vehicle. Deputy Zlateff followed the vehicle to Broadway and Park when the driver stopped and told Deputy Zlateff the Isuzu Rodeo in front of them had just ran into the back of his vehicle. Deputy Zlateff caught up to the Rodeo near Valleyway and Alki and activated the emergency lights on his marked patrol unit to stop the vehicle. The vehicle failed to yield and after traveling several blocks attempted to flee from Deputy Zlateff. Deputies Zlateff and Brownell pursued the 45- year-old male driver of the suspect vehicle eastbound on Broadway to Argonne. The pursuit continued and at Ella and Alki, the suspect was unable to negotiate the intersection and ran into an awning at 7800 E. Alki. Both Deputies attempted to box in the driver, but he was able to manipulate his vehicle out and continue northbound on Ella. Deputy Zlateffs patrol vehicle became disabled and Deputy Brownell continued to pursue the male suspect northbound on Ella. Sgt. Russ Dowdy had responded and was assisting with attempting to stop the male suspect, however, as the suspect reached the area of 1322 N. Ella Rd., which is a dead-end, Deputy Brownell and Sgt. Dowdy boxed in the suspect vehicle. The male driver rammed the back of Sgt. Dowdy's patrol vehicle, but was unable to escape. The suspect refused commands to exit his vehicle, kept reaching towards the passenger side floorboard and required a taser application to be safely taken into custody. The male suspect was booked into jail on the felony charges of Hit and Run, 2nd Degree Assault and Eluding. Additional misdemeanor charges included DUI and Driving While License Suspended 1st Degree. Protect Yourself From Vehicle Prowlers - To date, Spokane County residents, including Spokane City and Spokane Valley, have reported over 180 vehicle prowlings in the area of Centennial Trailheads since the beginning of the year. In the past two years, the number of reported incidents was 107 for the entire year. Citizens have been victimized by either leaving their door unlocked, windows down, or valuables inside their vehicle in plain sight. With the holiday season approaching, the Spokane Valley Police would like to remind citizens to keep valuables out of plain sight inside their vehicles, to detach GPS units from their dashboard, if possible, and to place their garage door opener in an alternate location other than their visor. Husband, Wife Sleeping While Burglarized — In mid-November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Tom Walker investigated a residential burglary near 3700 S. Ridgeview in Spokane Valley. Deputy Walker contacted the 74-year-old homeowner who said sometime during the early morning hours, his house was burglarized. The victim said the suspect(s) entered through an unlocked door that leads into his garage. He said the suspect(s) stole a$500 Nexstar G.T. telescope as well as his 2007 Hyundai Elantra. The victim said he found his garage door open and still attached to the opening mechanism. He said he did not hear the door open because his bedroom is on the opposite side of the residence. The victim said the suspect(s) stole his wallet, items from his 73-year-old wife's purse and looked through their dining room. He said the suspect(s) went into the basement and stole two laptop computers as well. He also said the suspect(s) placed the registration, insurance, garage door opener and other personal items neatly inside a box in the garage from his vehicle. Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this incident. Suspect Arrested For Occupied Spokane Valley Burglary - WSP stopped a 2009, Mazda MX3 on Hwy. 2 between Geiger and I-90 a few days after the above-mentioned residential burglary. As the Trooper approached the vehicle, the 26-year-old driver fled the scene, but after a short pursuit was taken into custody. The female victim's driver's license from the S. Ridgeview burglary was found on Page 6 the 26-year-old male suspect's person. It was also determined the Mazda had been stolen from a residence in Spokane at about 5:00 a.m. that morning. Later that day, Spokane Police Officers were in the area of Carlisle and Hamilton when they spotted the victim's stolen vehicle from the Ridgeview burglary. They stopped the vehicle and took a 28-year-old male and a 33-year-old female into custody. Spokane Valley Property Crimes Detective Roger Knight interviewed the 26-year-old male who told Detective Knight he used to live in the area of S. Ridgeview and knew there were wealthy residents in the area. He said he survives by "walking garages," meaning he looks for unlocked garage doors to enter. He said it is not difficult to find homeowners who leave their garage doors and vehicle doors unlocked. The male suspect said he entered the S. Ridgeview house through the unlocked garage doors and burglarized the residence. He also told Detective Knight that he saw the homeowners sleeping in their bed while he was inside the residence. The 26-year-old suspect said after burglarizing the house and stealing their car, he met with the 28-year-old male and 33-year-old female and gave them the vehicle. He said he walked around after that and found the Mazda unlocked and running near the 2400 block of W. Garland and stole it. He told Detective Knight he has no idea who has the credit cards he stole from the Ridgeview homeowners. • The 26-year-old male was booked into jail for felony charges of Residential Burglary, Theft, and Taking a Motor Vehicle Without Permission. • The 28-year-old male was booked into jail on felony charges of Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle and three counts of Possession of a Controlled Substance. • The 33-year-old female was booked into jail on felony charges of Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, Possession of Stolen Property, and two counts of Possession of a Controlled Substance. Spokane Valley Mall Robbery—In late November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to a robbery call at Tilt Tilt Arcade located in the Spokane Valley Mall. Deputies contacted the employee who told them at about 10:00 p.m. he was closing the business. He said a white male, wearing a dark hoodie, blue jeans, in his late twenties to early thirties, pointed either a rifle or shotgun at his chest and demanded money. The employee said the suspect had a white kerchief over his face and left in an unknown direction of travel. Sheriffs Deputies evacuated the neighboring movie theatre for safety purposes, but were not able to locate the suspect. The suspect resembled the description of the suspect from a robbery at Zip Trip on Trent earlier in the week. Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this incident. Assault Resembles "Knockout Game" - On a Saturday in late November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to an assault call at Hico at 9219 E. Sprague. The victim said he was inside Hico to make a purchase. When he came outside he said there were three 17-21 year old white males in the parking lot, and as he walked by the three males he said, "What's up fellas?" The victim said at that point all three males started to violently kick and punch him on the face and body. He fell to the ground and they continued to kick him until a witness inside the store came out and broke up the fight. He had no idea who the males were and said they left in a small, light-colored vehicle, possibly a Honda Civic style vehicle. Deputies on scene said this assault resembled the "knockout game" that is happening across the country where young male teens video tape themselves randomly assaulting men, women and children for no reason whatsoever. Crime Stoppers is offering a cash reward for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this incident. Three Suspects Arrested With 24 Felony Convictions — In the early morning hours in late November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Byron Zlateff was on a suspicious vehicle call at Cataldo Page 7 and Pines. When the 43-year-old male driver saw Deputy Zlateff, he and two female passengers fled the scene at a high rate of speed. The two female passengers were later identified. The male suspect has 19 felony convictions, one female has three and the other female has two. Deputy Zlateff attempted to stop the male suspect who continued to drive at a high rate of speed failing to stop. The pursuit ended in Painted Hills near Apache Pass Road and Lochsa when the suspect drove into a dead- end and all three occupants were taken into custody. All three had active felony warrants for their arrest and were booked into jail on those warrants. The male suspect was also charged with Felony Eluding. Unknown How Meth Ends Up In Ice Cream - On a Friday night in late November, Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputy Jeff Thurman was patrolling the area of 100 S. Havana when he stopped a vehicle for a traffic infraction. He contacted the 60-year-old driver who told Deputy Thurman he did not have a valid driver's license. While Deputy Thurman was checking the male's driving status in his patrol vehicle, he saw the male suspect reaching down towards the center console in his vehicle. Now concerned for his safety, Deputy Thurman ordered the male out of the vehicle. Deputy Thurman saw the male's hands were covered in a white creamy substance and saw a quart of ice cream in the center console. Deputy Thurman also saw a plastic baggie in the ice cream that later field tested presumptive positive for methamphetamine. The male suspect tried to convince Deputy Thurman multiple times that he had no idea how the meth got into his ice cream. Fitch was booked into jail for the felony charge of Possession of a Controlled Substance/Methamphetamine, Driving While Suspended, and two other infractions. *************** Page 8 SELECTED DATA SPOKANE VALLEY 01/01/12 THROUGH 11/30/12 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAD INCIDENTS 9,146 12,417 8,109 8,008 6,270 8,290 52,240 TRAFFIC STOPS 2,269 3,451 1,942 1,694 1,675 1,847 12,878 ACCIDENTS 307 507 273 221 228 397 1,933 STOLEN VEHICLES 102 112 89 95 53 64 515 VEHICLE RECOVERED 68 65 53 49 29 38 302 BURGLARY 202 178 166 115 116 167 944 ROBBERY 7 13 14 11 11 12 68 THEFT 333 522 427 471 271 500 2,524 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 258 337 306 292 198 211 1,602 VEHICLE PROWLING 125 204 181 188 134 235 1,067 01/01/13 THROUGH 11/30/13 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAD INCIDENTS 9,226 12,347 8,289 8,483 5,752 8,412 52,509 TRAFFIC STOPS 1,824 2,946 1,829 1,934 1,192 1,699 11,424 ACCIDENTS 329 512 260 236 200 375 1,912 STOLEN VEHICLES 119 110 93 107 48 81 558 VEHICLE RECOVERED 81 89 76 53 31 45 375 BURGLARY 232 185 152 176 81 141 967 ROBBERY 21 20 10 14 11 9 85 THEFT 576 527 480 473 296 493 2,845 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 248 358 238 282 147 221 1,494 VEHICLE PROWLING 163 237 182 215 142 176 1,115 10/01/12 THROUGH 10/31/12 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAD INCIDENTS 832 1,154 784 810 602 779 4961 TRAFFIC STOPS 210 322 217 207 159 179 1294 ACCIDENTS 30 45 26 23 21 36 181 STOLEN VEHICLES 11 13 5 9 7 7 52 VEHICLE RECOVERED 6 8 7 4 1 5 31 BURGLARY 20 20 26 15 20 20 121 ROBBERY 0 2 0 2 4 0 8 THEFT 40 51 37 42 35 60 265 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 31 26 22 42 20 17 158 VEHICLE PROWLING 14 22 17 30 16 21 120 12/5/2013 SELECTED DATA SPOKANE VALLEY 10/01/13 THROUGH 10/31/13 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAD INCIDENTS 801 1,110 673 946 472 780 4782 TRAFFIC STOPS 117 238 149 337 83 137 1061 ACCIDENTS 36 45 18 19 21 27 166 STOLEN VEHICLES 14 12 5 12 5 10 58 VEHICLE RECOVERED 5 10 2 5 2 8 32 BURGLARY 16 22 18 19 6 14 95 ROBBERY 4 3 1 3 1 0 12 THEFT 44 49 44 56 35 64 292 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 30 44 21 25 16 12 148 VEHICLE PROWLING 22 36 11 26 18 37 150 11/01/12 THROUGH 11/30/12 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAD INCIDENTS 769 1,081 751 705 501 688 4495 TRAFFIC STOPS 174 286 181 166 130 150 1087 ACCIDENTS 28 45 27 20 28 30 178 STOLEN VEHICLES 8 19 22 13 9 7 78 VEHICLE RECOVERED 10 10 10 6 0 1 37 BURGLARY 25 23 21 8 12 20 109 ROBBERY 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 THEFT 35 49 30 42 19 37 212 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 25 23 22 23 17 16 126 VEHICLE PROWLING 19 16 12 22 14 17 100 11/01/13 THROUGH 11/30/13 1 2 3 4 5 6 TOTAL CAD INCIDENTS 731 1,052 761 681 483 705 4413 TRAFFIC STOPS 147 261 208 99 83 147 945 ACCIDENTS 29 57 28 27 23 33 197 STOLEN VEHICLES 11 12 12 7 6 3 51 VEHICLE RECOVERED 10 5 5 3 2 2 27 BURGLARY 25 20 17 12 7 12 93 ROBBERY 1 1 0 1 0 1 4 THEFT 42 54 37 39 24 44 240 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 22 30 16 17 11 23 119 VEHICLE PROWLING 20 27 18 26 10 16 117 12/5/2013 2013 NOVEMBER CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Nov-13 Nov-12 2013 2012 2,012 2,011 2,010 2009 2008 2007 BURGLARY 93 111 989 973 1062 1027 936 725 753 584 FORGERY 90 83 791 719 826 593 341 297 354 365 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 119 126 1498 1609 1770 1566 1183 1245 893 1,265 NON-CRIMINAL 10 3 99 105 108 160 917 892 944 839 PROPERTY OTHER 111 104 1353 1122 1236 1126 837 933 828 890 RECOVERED VEHICLES 36 57 506 401 446 416 365 187 319 343 STOLEN VEHICLES 51 81 564 530 586 566 496 298 496 478 THEFT 240 207 2780 2421 2636 2512 2365 2162 1,846 1,881 VEHICLE OTHER 19 30 253 267 287 195 3 5 7 3 VEHICLE PROWLING 117 100 1116 1072 1165 1491 1395 920 1069 682 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 886 903 9,949 9,425 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 7,338 ASSAULT 85 58 876 865 936 963 895 927 869 853 DOA/SUICIDE 15 19 209 236 256 213 188 210 269 221 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 17 56 512 544 600 714 1297 1226 1063 874 HOMICIDE 0 0 2 2 2 3 1 3 3 1 KIDNAP 4 1 22 15 17 15 16 21 16 23 MENTAL 20 9 250 250 270 253 289 310 360 350 MP 10 16 144 140 154 125 128 115 95 83 PERSONS OTHER 224 258 2897 2871 3112 2484 1692 1621 1,354 1,337 ROBBERY 4 2 93 72 79 98 68 75 71 60 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 11 17 133 193 212 162 153 159 95 73 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 390 436 5138 5188 5638 4997 4727 4,667 4,195 3,875 ADULT RAPE 5 6 32 79 89 67 44 35 44 43 CHILD ABUSE 3 3 26 26 27 89 115 159 148 104 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 23 16 210 172 190 184 206 157 86 92 SEX REGISTRATION 1 1 4 8 8 2 1 2 3 4 INDECENT LIBERTIES 1 2 17 24 27 17 8 10 11 18 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 10 12 13 23 28 35 39 31 RUNAWAY 21 33 368 503 530 510 490 440 369 295 SEX OTHER 5 4 41 36 38 56 215 211 179 194 STALKING 0 0 21 24 24 19 18 15 21 17 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 42 31 406 397 424 341 215 175 142 152 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 101 96 1165 1281 1370 1294 1387 1271 1,108 996 TOTAL ITF 23 24 287 391 430 521 542 671 838 808 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 307 326 3225 3612 3957 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 3,800 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,707 1,785 19,764 19,897 21,723 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,465 16,817 1800 ,- 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 `2012 X2013 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls V° JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 2012 X2013 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 -2012 -0-2013 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 2012 X2013 300 250 200 150 100 50 Spokane Valley Person Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -2011 -2012 X2013 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 Spokane Valley Sex Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 --2012 12013 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Spokane Valley Property Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 2012 12013 v"u RPM -■ ■ J IFEE-I`VE Wie ■rA l 1 TASEtimis'iTE ..gits all ice.'rot MILINME■■112®1■fi 1n ■rn!I itlls�r.,s_ —••---�-- - MEM Mil En A4 IngElill=711111 rall.� 't 31•.Z1Y Ett ;Mr �- I ,,.; A, I �f,th gm 57th NI I hi INIUI 2013 November Vehicle Prowling Hotspots ■_a . "E A111f k� z -ik :O 2` a �11���� i���1EE INREggimi ITZ x:11■--r MI ONE NaMel • � I� wsa t Y/� Psmet ��, nV Catald. �� ■� �� — PI E �.� IAA � �: :� �■■ L .,I .=11�1_• L7t �II imp .� ■ 1■Z'F 1J ii! dm 0.5 WA R■■11 — ■■■1'l�!U IUUni• Ili N �� 11Cr1��111i���®�� ■�•�� �.■� e!(ey .. mod' as �=��eDa■yl■1 WM. Lake -■h�■mo r�� ..r i 111©e ~~►�o� —axe �. � aktim� .. 4 . 0°' �4 -- : lii`��1 vii: ■41 1 —P 1 X9 pgL —e■■.■ slra.ur•'••■■ imams .■■ ■ EMPLIERIffiri U*144.11-- _=m w--EM:Ftg Wm. ma NE Emil mg EN Ett, iii= 11)La 8. Ink 57th NUMB A4 iromramram .,u w thom iri �■����h cth ; miles 2013 November Residential Burglary Hotspots I 1 hi.- Mari`, ■, Brid•e.•IIY91t©os�— . •11.1J111:.; l imosimegir !Ill jl�i_I11�y11611 I�IiI NM INAM MIL= rver ide s�111Cr1■SI��• ���- C nn Y_ � El■ 111'►- AVIV .-. .' 1.■. 1-�1 ■1��1:..I't7'C j j ����I� '-"tal IIIA025UL ■II7--. liENN F9I-s1l13lt. Ge 9th •FIUHI�NI I •li•• II �y ro I r �i I■=aM] per �• •�1 I—L7IIE1- I—[ilwcr— 25th 1--C41—IV smcr IIMFL!I!-- IFiF1F:N IM MEki.mom AP IIPJFGFR�— rarl. 3�th e1� R7_7! G ya ,Morns Old �.• I _L Missi �m�` ��r wirsolirwcital � s�°e iberty Lake �'smet „ ��� Catald. a AT/ Ar1 h :th 61.�3.P MENWAir ME�ILil7II,i vim rail—��a�►v������e����i���1�i+���1� I I—'EINLei-r 2013 November Traffic Collision Hotspots .! ,_mIN P,E:IC /ji u ; ►� • wn ' srr-ryur•...�- uMMUM.i raga I, M M r !7 Dsa mark I �Smet A��I� g�Catald. J �=■■ice: ' ;' rirma■i viii m rer r►—•'-, i tee—= gin 'I 'I M mMEN It ME r�■1i 'fl�fl - w` MAW AMEMI p�ry� ��' ' MAW E➢�������?Jser.��k.. Iei %�� �!� � ���i© ��■� � 1"� sum 111 Not ■ 2013 October & November Stolen Vehicle Hotspots * 2013 NOVEMBER CRIMES BY CITIES (Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) 12/4/2013 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV Total BURGLARY 5 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 84 0 5 93 0 197 FORGERY 11 0 1 1 0 0 1 5 0 1 101 0 2 90 0 213 MAL MISCHIEF 4 0 4 0 0 0 1 4 3 0 116 0 4 119 0 255 NON-CRIMINAL 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 5 0 5 0 2 10 0 26 PROP OTHER 21 1 7 0 0 0 16 0 1 0 68 0 19 111 0 244 RCRVD VEH 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 15 0 3 36 0 60 STL VEH 7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 21 1 7 51 0 91 THEFT 23 0 3 0 0 0 7 3 10 0 131 0 9 240 0 426 VEH OTHER 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 20 0 0 19 0 43 VEH PROWL 10 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 69 0 3 117 0 209 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 89 2 26 1 0 0 30 14 28 3 630 1 54 886 0 1,764 ASSAULT 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 50 0 10 85 0 162 DOA/SUICIDE 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 15 0 4 15 0 38 DV 5 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 25 0 2 17 0 51 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 5 MENTAL 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 19 0 0 20 0 46 MP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 8 0 0 10 0 20 PERS OTHER 9 0 7 2 0 0 5 12 6 1 149 0 16 224 0 431 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 4 0 7 TEL-HARASS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 11 0 2 11 0 26 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 19 0 13 2 0 0 11 24 13 1 279 0 34 390 0 786 ADULT RAPE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 5 0 10 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 5 CUST INTFER 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 0 23 0 42 SEXREGISF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 RUNAWAY 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 30 0 1 21 0 57 SEX OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 5 0 7 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 SUSP PERSON 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 35 0 4 42 0 98 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 11 0 3 0 0 0 3 4 2 1 90 0 9 101 0 224 TOTAL ITF 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 10 0 6 23 0 42 TOTAL TRAFFIC 5 1 7 0 0 0 4 2 5 0 175 0 91 307 0 597 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 124 3 50 3 0 0 50 44 48 5 1,184 1 194 1,707 0 3,413 12/4/2013 2013 November INCIDENTS BY CITIES (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) A AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS 18 184 201 7 2 0 18 130 97 13 3,055 4 526 4,413 1 8,669 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 14 13 105 1 0 0 13 61 32 2 955 2 456 1,660 0 3,314 DRUG SELF INT (PATROL) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 0 12 TRAFFIC STOPS 1 6 30 0 0 0 6 20 20 1 485 0 280 945 0 1,794 TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST/CIT/IN) 1 1 9 0 0 0 2 5 3 1 221 0 117 401 0 761 TS (WARRANTS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 10 20 0 36 CALLS FOR SERVICE 4 171 96 6 2 0 5 69 65 11 2,100 2 70 2,753 1 5,355 ALARMS 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 106 0 1 85 0 204 ACCIDENTS 0 11 7 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 246 0 14 197 0 480 ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 18 0 22 DRUG CALLS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 20 0 32 DV 7 0 4 1 0 0 1 7 1 1 103 0 10 147 0 282 DUI 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 73 0 6 69 0 155 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 3 29 0 41 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 1 5 14 1 0 0 0 14 8 2 301 0 25 479 0 850 VEHICLE RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 5 27 0 49 911 ABANDON LINE 0 73 13 5 1 0 0 5 2 1 194 0 11 255 0 560 SHOPLIFTING 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 42 0 48 ALL ARRESTS (ARREST/CIT/IN) 3 1 16 0 0 0 2 10 9 1 318 0 143 647 0 1,150 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 2 0 9 3 0 0 1 19 18 2 469 1 11 551 0 1,086 12/10/2013 Spokane valley. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT November 2013 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Total %of Contract Name Contractor Amount Expended as Contract of 11/31/13 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $1,364,119.23 99.81% Street Sweeping AM Sweeping $490,199.94 $400,893.74 81.78% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $188,470.30 99.20% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $37,995.24 27.14% Landscaping Ace Landscaping $90,803.72 $81,592.28 89.86% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $6,139.37 61.39% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $56,170.76 93.62% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $215,000.00 $128,620.09 59.82% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $546,993.50 86.55% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00 $16,394.00 81.97% * Budget estimates Citizen Requests for Public Works 50 45 40 vi N 35 — 61 c 30 — ccc 25 N 20 i `) 15 — `r''. � 10 ( � 5 I 1i 0 � _ I I I _ I ■ I IITA- Total Citizen Landscapi Dead Roadway Pothole Sign& Storm Misc. Traffic Requests: rig Right- Animal Hazard Requests Signal Drainage/ Requests Requests Public of-ways Removal Requests Erosion Works Ief Submitted 44 1 13 3 1 10 3 6 7 2In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H Resolved 44 1 13 3 1 10 3 6 7 `Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.netl, http:ff www.ecy.wa.govfgeoqraphic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, httpjf/www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamationlcontent.aspx7c=2224 and http:ffwww.spokaneriverpartners.com/ CAPITAL PROJECTS (See attached Capital Projects Spreadsheet) STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for November 2013: • Pothole patching/shouldering • Poe asphalt performed patch work • Poe subcontractors completed stormwater and concrete repairs. • The Geiger crew continues with garbage pickup on arterials and dryland grass vegetation management. • AAA Sweeping fall sweep and arterial sweeping concluded for the year. STORMWATER UTILITY • 14th Avenue, Custer to Carnahan - Construction substantially complete. See Project#0190. • SE Yardley Retrofits Project - Started design work (see Project#0192). • Reviewed past/current/future Capital projects with Ecology staff field visits 11/20. • $120k Ecology Design Grant: Started design work on several projects that Ecology will reimburse the City for and will be eligible to compete for construction funding next year, including the Broadway, Havana to Fancher project and several diversion projects. • Started updates to Stormwater Utility Fee Rolls and Impervious surfacing maps. • Eastern Washington Effectiveness Studies Development— Phase 1 The City received notice of award for a $300,000 grant to look at helping the City and other stormwater permit holders in Eastern Washington meet additional regulations under the new stormwater permit. TRAFFIC • School Zone Flashing Beacons The City was awarded a grant though WTSC to purchase flashing school zone beacons for Adams and McDonald Elementary Schools. The beacons have been ordered and should be delivered by mid-January. Installation is weather dependent. GRANT APPLICATIONS New Call for Projects • CDBG Call for Projects Staff submitted two CDBG applications to Spokane County for the following projects approved by council: Farr Rd Sidewalk--5th to 8th Sprague Ave and Long Road Sidewalk — Appleway to Arties, Sprague to Greenacres Elementary School • TIB Call for Projects Staff submitted TIB grant applications for the following three projects which were approved by council on July 30: Broadway Ave Improvement — Flora to Barker; 32nd Ave Sidewalk — SR 27 to Evergreen; Indiana Ave Sidewalk—Pines (SR 27) to Indiana Unfortunately, none of the above projects were selected for funding. Additional information on this will be forthcoming. Information in bold indicates updates 2 Ill ft Spokarne Public Works Projects ,....0' alley Monthly Summary-Design &Construction November-2013 Estimated Total Project Proposed %Complete Construction Project # Design&Construction Projects Funding Bid Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA-BR 01/17/14 95 0 12/31/15 $ 15,833,333 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 03/01/14 55 0 12/31/14 $ 1,976,800 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 04/01/14 10 0 10/31/14 $ 671,050 0185 Adams Road Resurfacing Project CDBG 01/31/14 35 0 06/30/14 $ 183,710 Street Preservation Projects 0179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 FHWA-STP(U) 09/20/13 100 0 08/15/14 $ 1,522,400 0180 Carnahan,Indiana&Sprague St.Pres COSV 08/19/13 100 70 05/01/14 $ 1,420,934 0187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 02/01/14 10 0 08/31/14 $ 1,193,614 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade(5RTC06-3) FHWA-CMAQ 04/25/14 95 0 08/31/14 $ 1,290,636 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 07/01/14 10 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 0181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade HSIP 08/01/13 100 65 03/31/14 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0173 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Dept of Ecology 05/24/13 95 20 12/31/13 $ 885,000 0182 2013 Street Presery-Ph 2-Stormwater COSY 09/20/13 100 0 08/15/14 $ 183,380 0192 SE Yardley Retrofits Dept of Ecology 05/16/14 0 0 12/31/14 $ 1,000,000 Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk Infill FHWA-CMAQ 02/14/14 80 50 06/30/14 $ 1,139,955 0169 Argonne/Mullan Safety Indiana-Broadway HSIP 07/01/13 100 90 10/01/13 $ 111,750 0170 Argonne Road: Empire Ave-Knox Ave HSIP 07/01/13 100 95 12/30/13 $ 180,640 0191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements WUTC 01/31/14 50 0 08/31/14 $ 50,750 Design Estimated Total Project Complete %Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STP(U) 09/30/14 5 $ 517,919 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 04/15/14 20 $ 175,260 0142 Broadway®Argonne/Mullan FHWA•STP(U) 01/30/14 90 $ 276,301 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/01/15 0 $ 1,000,373 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 02/01/14 80 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 03/01/14 8 $ 200,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/14 0 $ 745,000 0176 Appleway Trail COSV 10/31/14 90 $ 150,000 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 7, 2014 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information [' admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: University Road Overpass Study Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: n/a PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Discussion on 8/24/10, Approval of grant application on 9/21/10, Info memo on 10/30/12, Motion to approve consultant contract on 11/13/12. BACKGROUND: With 1-90 bisecting Spokane Valley, there are limited opportunities to cross between the two sides of the City. This lack of connectivity results in substantial traffic congestion around the 1-90 interchanges and limited opportunities to walk or bike across the freeway. For the most part, the City has a crossing of 1-90 every mile; however, the exception is between the Argonne Road and Pines Road interchanges, which are two miles apart. In 2010 the City applied for funding to conduct a transportation study of the industrial and residential area bound by SR-290, SR-27, Argonne Road, and 1-90. Although the title of the project focuses on an overpass at University Road, the study evaluated other improvements to alleviate congestion on the Argonne and Pines Road corridors. The study was intended to look at improving the overall motorized and non-motorized transportation connections for residents and businesses within the study area. The idea of a University Road overpass had been discussed by WSDOT and SRTC in the past, but a full evaluation had not been completed. Staff performed a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) consultant selection process and selected Fehr and Peers as the most highly qualified firm for this work. The City signed the contact with the consultant to conduct the Study on 12/4/12. Attached is a memorandum from the consultant describing the University Road Overpass Study - Summary Findings. This memo summarizes the process and results of the study to date, and discusses options for the next steps in the process. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Project Revenues: Estimated Project Expenditures: CMAQ Grant (86.5%) $ 216,000 PE - Consultant contract $ 229,802 City Match (13.5%) $ 33,711 PE - Staff time $ 19,909 Other Funding $ — $ — Total Funds Available $ 249,711 Total Est. Expenditures $ 249,711 STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Work Director ATTACHMENTS: University Road Overpass Study: Summary Findings FEHR '' PEERS MEMORANDUM Date: December 16, 2013 To: City of Spokane Valley From: Chris Breiland and Ariel Davis, Fehr& Peers Subject: University Road Overpass Study:Summary Findings SE12-0282 Background With I-90 bisecting Spokane Valley, there are limited opportunities to cross between the two sides of the City. This lack of connectivity results in substantial traffic congestion around the I-90 interchanges and limited opportunities to walk or bike across the freeway. For the most part, the City has a crossing of I-90 every mile; however, the exception is between the Argonne Road and Pines Road interchanges, which are two miles apart. Earlier studies have recognized this lack of connectivity and the resulting impacts to the transportation system. In 1997, WSDOT evaluated the potential of an interchange with I-90 at University Road; however, this project did not get much traction given competing regional needs. In 2009, the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program found that City residents perceived crossing I-90 as a major barrier to accessing the Centennial Trail. A crossing between Argonne and Pines was identified as a good potential location for new bike and pedestrian connectivity. Based on these earlier studies, the University Road Overpass Study was kicked off to answer these two questions: 1. How can congestion be relieved at the Argonne Road and Pines Road interchanges? 2. How can bicycle and pedestrian connectivity be improved to access the regional trail networks and better connect neighborhoods on either side of I-90? At the outset, the University Road corridor was of high interest since it had the potential to address both the congestion and pedestrian/bicycle connectivity issues simultaneously by constructing a new overpass of I-90. However, as the study went on, it was determined that the University Road alignment had only marginal congestion relief benefits and had substantial neighborhood resistance. This memo summarizes the analysis process, public outreach process, and findings of the study to date. The next steps are also briefly summarized. Project Initiation and Existing Conditions Analysis The first phase of the project was an existing conditions analysis to better understand the transportation issues in the area. Data on traffic flow, level of service (LOS), transit services, bicycle/pedestrian facilities, utilities, and land ownership were collected. In addition, the latest breakthrough in travel pattern analysis was used in which anonymous data from cell phones and other mobile devices were used to identify the major travel patterns in the area. The key findings of the existing conditions analysis are summarized below: Safeco Plaza,1001 4th Avenue,Suite 4120,Seattle WA,98154(206)576-4220 www.fehrandpeers.com City of Spokane Valley F E H Rf PEERS 12/16/13 Page 2 of 7 Auto • Intersection LOS analysis indicated substantial southbound PM peak hour congestion on Argonne Road between Montgomery and I-90. The other congestion hot-spot was at Pines and Broadway. All other intersections operate well. Pedestrians and Bicycles • There are few options for travelers to cross I-90 and reach the Centennial Trail. The Argonne/Mullan and Pines overpasses each have a sidewalk on one side. There are no dedicated bicycle facilities that cross I-90 in the study area. Dedicated bicycle facilities are provided on several roadways including University Road and Broadway Avenue. • Travel surveys indicate that walking and bicycling have low mode shares among work trips in the study area--roughly four and one percent, respectively. Recreational walking trips are more common, making up more than 10 percent of all trips. Counts at several locations in Spokane Valley yielded pedestrian volumes of roughly one-half to two percent of vehicle volumes. Pedestrian activity was higher in the better connected neighborhoods south of the study area. Freight Rail • Two railroads pass through the study area, crossing roadways at four locations. All crossings have standard safety treatments including gates, lights, and bells. These crossings form a barrier for travelers, in particular emergency response vehicles. • Train/auto collisions are rare with only one incident at the five crossings in the past twenty years. Transit • Five STA bus routes serve the study area with destinations including local schools, shopping centers, and transit centers, as well as Downtown Spokane. Most bus routes run every 30 minutes during the day and every hour during the evening and weekends. Land Use • In general, the area south of I-90 is residential with commercial uses along the north-south arterials of Argonne, Mullan, and Pines. North of I-90 most of the study area is light industrial with pockets of residential. A major commercial center is at the corner of Argonne and Montgomery. • Property ownership is largely fragmented, especially in areas of single family residential and small commercial uses. There are several large consolidated properties north of I-90. Utilities • No major utilities, such as an interstate gas line that may influence the location of a potential overpass, were identified along the potential alignments. However, numerous local utilities such as gas, water, and electricity are present. Public Workshop In April, City Staff and Fehr & Peers held a project open house and workshop to discuss the results of the existing conditions analysis and to solicit feedback on which congestion relief and bicycle/pedestrian connectivity projects should be considered for further study. Below is a summary of what was discussed at the meeting: • The public agreed with the findings indicating substantial traffic congestion, particularly on Argonne Road. There was strong desire to relieve congestion in the area. City of Spokane Valley F E H Rf PEERS 12/16/13 Page 3 of 7 • The existing conditions analysis indicated that there are no "low stress" connections across I-90 in the vicinity of the project study area, with only small sidewalks provided on the Mullan and Pines Road overpasses. In addition, the analysis found substantial traffic congestion on Argonne north of I-90 and around the Pines interchange with I-90. • Using the latest technology in data collection, Fehr & Peers determined that there is a substantial amount of demand to cross I-90 for relatively short trips. The highest demand was between the neighborhoods north of I-90 and Valley Mission Park. This result suggested that a good location for an overpass to accommodate potential bicycle and pedestrian traffic would be near the park. • We presented the following options for the public to consider at the workshop: o Full vehicle/pedestrian/bicycle overpass at University o Improvements at the Argonne and Pines overpasses, including wider sidewalks and congestion relief enhancements o Pedestrian/bicycle only overpasses at Felts, University, and Bowdish (in conjunction with interchange improvements at Argonne and Pines) o Pedestrian/bicycle/emergency vehicle overpasses at Felts, University, and Bowdish (in conjunction with interchange improvements at Argonne and Pines) • The response from the public to the options above are summarized below: o Vehicle improvements at the Pines and Argonne Road interchanges were strongly supported o Bowdish pedestrian/bicycle only overpass was the most popular improvement for pedestrian and bicycle crossing since it directly accessed Valley Mission Park o No support for an overpass at Felts o Some support for a vehicle overpass at University Road, however, the neighborhood directly south of I-90 along University vigorously opposed this option o Some support for a pedestrian/bicycle overpass at University Road, however, there was concern about impacts to the Spalding property and about whether people would like to travel through the Spalding property Stakeholder Outreach Fehr & Peers and City Staff initiated an extensive stakeholder outreach process to understand issues, test ideas, and refine the findings of the study. Through this process, we interviewed area property owners, the fire department, the parks department, school districts, railroads, and the chamber of commerce. We also set up a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) to provide guidance on our evaluation of alternatives. The TAC included representatives from WSDOT, Avista, City of Millwood, and Spokane Transit Authority (STA). This stakeholder outreach process was invaluable since it led us to several key findings: • There are no congestion relief projects at the Argonne or Pines interchanges that are in the current I-90 plan. • Not much can be added to the Pines Road interchange to relieve congestion without total reconstruction. City of Spokane Valley FEH Rk PEERS 12/16/13 Page 4 of 7 • The Argonne and Pines overpasses cannot be easily modified to improve better sidewalks, they would need to be completely reconstructed or a new parallel bridge would need to be built. • Russ Spalding acknowledged concerns about the University Road alignment and how it might impact the business. He was open to working with the City to provide access easements or right of way along the east or west sides of the property to improve connectivity. • The park department was open to providing access through Valley Mission Park, so long as it did not interfere with Splashdown. • The fire department supported emergency vehicle crossings, but noted that this location is not high on their priority list right now. • None of the other area property owners or other interests in the area have any reservations about the project. • Avista has plans to construct high-voltage lines along the UPRR right of way, but they don't have any concerns about any future road or pedestrian/bike connections under the lines. Project Analysis Following the initial stakeholder outreach and the public workshop, a total of 15 potential improvement projects to relieve congestion and improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity were screened. During the screening process, some projects were removed as being impractical or lacking much benefit. Examples included adding new ramps to the Pines Road interchange (very expensive project with potential WSDOT concerns) and a new pedestrian/bike overpass at Felts Road (no public support and low demand for future travel). Below is a summary of the principal projects that were carried into the final evaluation: • Interchange improvements at Argonne/Mullan to relieve congestion, including the following: o Diverging diamond interchange using existing bridges o New Argonne overpass with additional southbound lane o Diverging diamond interchange with new Argonne overpass to provide an additional lane of capacity o All options would include some modifications and improvements to the on-ramps to the freeway • Pedestrian/bicycle/vehicle crossing at University Road • Pedestrian/bicycle only crossings at University Road and through Valley Mission Park (the Bowdish crossing option was dropped because there is no available right of way north of I-90). • Traffic signal and turn lane improvements in and around the Pines Road interchange with I-90 (based on discussions with WSDOT, more extensive improvements at this interchange would require total interchange reconstruction, which was not considered as part of this project). Summary of Results The table on the following page summarizes the results of the analysis for some of the alternatives. The following performance measures were considered when assessing the performance of the alternatives: • Project cost • Pedestrian and bicycle demand to cross I-90 • Traffic congestion relief benefits at the Argonne and Pines interchanges City of Spokane Valley FEH Rk PEERS 12/16/13 Page 5 of 7 • Neighborhood impacts (how the project would potentially impact the neighborhoods south of I- 90) • Conflicts with existing/planned utilities and other infrastructure • Environmental impacts (potential negative impacts of a project; mostly concerned with potential soil contamination at the Spalding site) • Consistency with the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program • Connectivity to Spokane Valley/Millwood Trail • Transit accommodation (how well the proposed project would serve existing and planned transit service) City of Spokane Valley 10/22/13 Page 6 of 7 Performance Measure TABLE 1 - PERFORMANCE METRICS FOR SELECTED ALTERNATIVES No Build Alternative: No congestion relief or ped/bike connectivity projects Alternative A: Argonne- New southbound lane r Alternative C: Argonne- Diverging diamond (6 lanes) FEH R4' PEERS Alternative F: University-Vehicle bridge Alternative G: Valley Mission Park/Trail - Ped/bike bridges (UPRR&1-90)1 Cost $0 $6.4M $8.2M $10.6M $5.2M Pedestrian and Bicycle Daily Forecast Connectivity to Valley Mission Park Congestion Relief 250 0 0 250 250 420 450 0 0 3 4 4 3 2 0 Neighborhood Impacts 4 4 4 0 4 Conflicts with Existing Infrastructure/Utilities 4 4 4 0 2 Environmental Impacts 4 4 4 2 2 Consistency with Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Connectivity to Spokane Valley/Millwood Trail 0 0 N/A N/A 4 2 0 0 4 4 Source:Fehr&Peers,2013. 0 Performs Worse Performs Better 4 City of Spokane Valley FEHR4' PEERS 10/22/13 Page 7 of 7 The table on the previous page indicates the following: • The additional southbound lane on Argonne Road (Alternative A) provides the most congestion relief of any option. This project has strong public support. • The 6-Lane Diverging Diamond Interchange option at Argonne Road (Alternative C) does not provide as much congestion relief as Alternative A and costs more. • The new pedestrian and bicycle bridge at Valley Mission Park (Alternative G) serves the most pedestrian and bicycle trips (assuming completion of the Appleway and Spokane-Valley Millwood Trail).This project has strong public support. • The vehicle bridge at University Road (Alternative F) has the most neighborhood impacts, has only moderate congestion relief benefits, and is the highest cost project. Based on these findings, Fehr & Peers and City Staff have selected the additional southbound lane at Argonne Road (Alternative A) as the highest priority project for future consideration. As part of this project, the existing pedestrian crossing facilities would be enhanced since the Argonne Road bridge would be reconstructed. This would improve the pedestrian crossing opportunities and support STA's plans for a potential park-and-ride lot in the area with new freeway flyer bus stops.This project has strong public support, addresses current and future congestion issues on the corridor, meets the needs of a variety of stakeholders in the area, and is not prohibitively expensive. The project team also identified a strong project to enhance pedestrian and bicycle connectivity: a new pedestrian/bicycle bridge at Valley Mission Park (Alternative G). While this project has a good degree of merit and is consistent with the Pedestrian and Bicycle Master Program, this bridge is not deemed to be a near-term priority since the greatest value from this overpass would come in conjunction with the completion of the Appleway and Spokane Valley-Millwood Trails. Next Steps Based on these findings, we propose to hold a workshop with the public to discuss and seek feedback on the preferred alternatives. Based on the outcome of that meeting, we hope to finalize the report for this study. Thus far, our work has been performed at budget, which allows us the option to tap a reserve fund that was set aside to cover additional work, or to produce documents that will enable the City to better seek grant funding in the future. Fehr & Peers and City Staff will work together to identify the best course of action moving forward. Possibilities include discussions with WSDOT on adding the interchange improvements to the I-90 long-range plan, updating other city and regional documents, or additional design/cost estimate work. DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of January 2, 2014; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Jan 14,2014,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 6] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading, Ordinance Street Vacation(13400 Block of Alki) — Christina Janssen (15 minutes) 3. Mayoral Appointments to Various Committees, Boards, etc. —Mayor (20 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 40 minutes] Jan 21,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 13]] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 28,2014,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tue,Jan 21] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading, Ordinance Street Vacation(13400 Block of Alki) —Christina Janssen (15 minutes) 3. Info Only: (a) Dept Monthly Reports; (b)2014 TIP Update [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 29—30, 2014, AWC Legislation Action Conference, Olympia, Washington ("City Action Days') Feb 4,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 27] 1. 2014 TIP Update —Eric Guth (15 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Feb 11,2014,Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 3] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Public Hearing: Proposed Amended 2014 TIP—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 3. Proposed Resolution Amending 2014 TIP—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 4. Annual Accomplishments Report for 2013 —Mike Jackson (60 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Feb 18,2014,Winter Workshop Special Meetin2: 8:30 a.m.—4:30 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 10] Meeting will be held in Council Chambers. Tentative agenda items include: council goals/work plan; business plan; solid waste; economic development; capital projects priorities; legislative committee; law enforcement February 18, 2014,No Evening Meeting Feb 25,2014, Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 17] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: (a) SRTC Call for Projects [STP Funding]; (b) Dept Monthly Rpts [*estimated meeting: minutes] February 28, 2014, 9 a.m. —noon—Spokane Regional Council of Governments Spokane Co Fair&Expo Center, Conference Facility,404 N Havana St Draft Advance Agenda 1/2/2014 1:00:14 PM Page 1 of 2 March 4,2014,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 24] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] March 8—12, 2014, NLC Congressional City Conference, Washington, D.C. March 11,2014,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 3] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) March 18,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 10] 1. SRTC Call for Projects (STP Funding) —Eric Guth (15 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) March 25,2014, Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 17] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Motion Consideration: SRTC Call for Projects—Eric Guth (10 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports April 1,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 24] April 8,2014,Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 31] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) April 15,2014, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, April 7] April 22,2014, Formal Meetin2 Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 14] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports April 29,2014,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 21] OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Avista Electrical Franchise AWC June 2014 conference CDBG(Comm Dev Block Grants) Coal Train EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) Future Acquisition Areas Public Safety Contract, Proposed Amendment Sports Commission Update STA Bus Shelters Stormwater Swales, care of *time for public or Council comments not included Draft Advance Agenda 1/2/2014 1:00:14 PM Page 2 of 2