Public Safety (Sheriff Study Group) Transition Committee - 12/17/2002
flZeport From The Public Safety T'ransition Committee
12-17-02
Yerry Lynch, Chair of The Public Safetv Transition Comenittee
Bill Crawford & llon Kachinsky - Sheriff's Studv Group Co Chairs .
Patty Platzla - Crcate Yaur Own Studv Group
Honorable Gity Council Members:
The Public Safety Transition Coffimattee met at Pines Jr. Mah last
spring and over the summer months it was determined that there was
two main facteons. One group was very concerned we research the
~ current policing program, the Spokane County Sheriff s l)epartment.
~ 'I'he second group was very partial to studying tbe possibilities of
creating our own police departrnent.
After great due diligence by both study groups the cammittee as a wholc
received presentadons from both propnnents. It was detcrmined that if
a contract could bc secured at the last fngure presented by the Sheriff,
for a short period, one to three years, this was the most practical and
least expensave solulion for the new city.
I would like to introduce the study committee chairs; Mr. T3ill Crawford
f rst for the Sheriff s study group and tben 1VIs. Patty Plotzid and ask
they give yau a synopsis of what their group found. When they are
done, I expect Captain Cal Waiicer representing the Spokane County
Sheriffs Department will speak to this issue and answer your questions.
. k'ersonally I com.mend botb committees for workiag very hard to obtai.n
useful information. T nk mu,
Terry .,ynch, Chair
Public Safety Transition Co,ffimittee
CC: City Clerk
Seven Copies
~ r
Spokane Valley Police Department Operations Budget
lFeasibility Study
Operations Budget Scenarios
Law Enforcement Transition Sub-committee
Make Your Own Department
~ 11,1 b,02
Spokane Valley Police Department Operations Budget
Thc intent of these operating budgets is to provide data to the City Council in order for them to
nul:e an informed decision as to the feasibilitv of operating a Spokane Valley Police Department.
ft is understaad that the organizational structure in this model will be subject to change depending
an the new police Ghief, the city manager, and the city council. No contact has been made with the
County or the City of Spekane conoerning possible contracts for some functions in these draft
scenarios.
This transition sub-committee has attempted to be as accurate as possible and canservativc in its
estimates. We are using an estimated populataon of 82,000_ Qther estimates have been as lotiv as
80,700, as givLn by the Boundary Review Board to 87,000, as pcr Greg Bever of the Joumal of
Business publication.
Our recornmendation on staHYn,g at start-up is 1.5 swom officers per 1,000 population with an
uJtimate goal of 2.0 per 1,000. Scenario I shows an estimated budget for 1.511,000 and Scenario II
is for 1.25/1,000 fnr comparison to ihe Sheriffs contract proposal.
While we triExl not to compane our feasibility study to the Sherifrs proposed contract w-e know that
the council will, and should, make comparisons. To assist in an apples-to-apples comparison, we
submit Scenazio II and since we cannot hire 6alf-time pcrsonnel in managanent positions, Nve shoNv
a full-time Captain in charge of the Investigaiions Bureau and full-time persannci in all functions in
the belief that it would be more cf_'ficient to combine functions thau split personnel betwoen
positions.
Much was said during the campaign for incorporation aQd ihe council eleciion campaigns about
independence frnm the City and County of Spokane, and at:out the professionalism of the Sheriffs
nersonnel - also about the need to rid our community of the Meth Labs by increasiog the level of
service by law eaforcement. Qur Se~,~nario 1 should accomplish those goals. One imporcant nate
about die staff of our city's police deparfment is thai state law mandates tbat «re hire all qualified
sheriTs personnel that wauld be displaced by starting our oKm deparUnent. That ensures us that
we c;rould have the same professionalism that we naw enjoy from the Shcriff's office.
capiral ouaay Baagets are scparate from these Opcrsting Budgcts.
11/18l02
Spokane Valley Police Department 11/24/2002 2:21 PM
Sen.,aQO COmDansons
811 galaries includ b~ en~fits SCENA O i SCENARIO II
1.5/1 ,000 = 124 1.25/1,000 =103
S,1FFICE OF THE CHIEF
Swom sal~rv
Chief 112,576 1 112,578 1 112,576
Lieutenant 89,708 1 89,708 L 88•7p8
Sergeant 81,061 J- 81,.051
3 283,345 2 202.284
Syppod staff salarX
Admin. Asst. 52,888 1 52.888 1 52,888
Info. Coord. (media) 63,096 l 63.098
1 52,888 2 115,984
illlaint & Ogff
Supplies 2,400 2,400
Minor equip 5,600 5,600
Setvices 1Q.000 j 0.000
18,000 18,000
TOTAL OFFICE OF T1iE CHIEF 354,233 336,268
UNIFORM BUREAI!
Patrol Division
Swo m_salarv
Captain 103,293 1 103,293 1 103,293
Lieutenant 89,708 2 179,416 2 179,416
Sergeant 81,061 8 648,488 8 648,486
Corporal 75,899 8 607,192 8 607,192
Potice Officer 62,376 44 2,744.544
* 75 5,031,445 63 4,282,933
SuRPort ff-, a LRrv
Secretary 45,431 1 45,431 1 45,431
Clerk III 36,715 1 36.715 L V,715
2 82,146 2 82,146
Maint & Oner _ Patrol
Overtime 240,900 215,204
Supplies 7,500 7,500
Minor equip 17,500 17,500
Services 25_000 25.000
290,900 265,204
Total Patrol Division 5,404,491 4,630,283
" Bear in mind, when you factor in to the staff of 75 sworn officers (63
in Scenario II) the regular days off, vacation, holidays, sick days, and
court appearances, only 409'a will be on duty on any given day.
IncJuded i in the Police Officer numbers are the K-9. DARE and SRO's.
Page 1
Spokane Valley Police Department 1112412002 2:21 PM
S-CENARIO i SCENARIO 11
Traffic Division
Swo 4alarv
Sergeant 81,061 1 81,081 1 81,061
Corparal 75,899 2 151,798 1 75,899
Palice Offir,8r 62,376 8- 499,008 I 311.88d
11 731,867 7 468,840
ampport staff salarv
Clerk 1 32,298 1 32•2~,B_
1 32,296 1 32,296
Main ~ r- Tra~c
Overtime 35,500 25,000 SuppJies 4,500 5,000
Minor equip 10,500 5,000
Services 15•~g0 30.000
85,500 45,000
Total Traffic Division 829,683 546,136
A ditionaLUniform Bureau M&O
TAC (crowd control) 8,000 8,000
EDU (explosive disposal) 4,000 4,000
SWAT 40,000 40,000
K-9 1Q.Qp0 10 QQQ
62,000 62,000
Salary/Benefts 5,877,754 4,784,069
Maint 8 Oper 418.400 37~,204
TOTAL UNIFORiYI BUREAU 6,296,154 5,238,419
Page 2
Spokane Vailey Police Department 11/24J2002 2:21 PPU!
SCENARIO I SSE„p1B.Q,IQ-(i
1NVESTIGATIOIdS BUREAU
Swom salarv
Captain 103,293 1 103,293 1 103,293
Lieutenant 89,708 2 179,416 2 179,416
Se►geant 81,061 4 324,244 4 324,244
Police Officer 62,376 24 1.497.024 a 1247.520
31 2,103,977 27 1,854,473
Sup.Po=aff-Aal=
Clerk I 32,296 4. 129,984 4- 129.184
4 129,184 4 129,184
Mai❑ &_Q12&f=10Vpgjga1ions
Overtime 88,800 80,000
Supplies 27,000 27,000
Minor equip 83,000 60,000
Meth team 100,000 100,000
Seniices , 46.500 46.5Q0
325,300 313,500
SalaryBenef"rts 2,233,161 1,963,657
Maint S Oper 22~~ ="k
TOTAL INVESTIGATlONS BUREAU 2,558,461 2,297,157
Page 3
Spokane Valley Police Qepartment 11/2412002 2:21 PM
SGENAi210 1 SCENAB O ll
SUPPORT SERVECES BUREAU
Swom salaN
Captain 103,293 1 103,293
Lieutenant 89,748 1 89,708
Sergeant 81,061 3 243.183 3 243.183
4 346,476 4 332,891
S~g~~ staff salarv
Admin Supervisor 62,869 1 81,320 1 81,320
Accountant II 57,272 1 57,272 1 57,272
Cont Spec (Clerk II) 22,697 1 34,846 1 34,846
Grant Spec (Clerk II) 22,697 1 34,846 1 34,846
Payroll clerk (Clerlc i) 20,462 1 32,296 1 32,296
Storekeeper 26,559 1 39,264 1 39,264
Personnel cteric 32,296 1 32,296 1 32,296
Secretary 45,431 1 45,431 1 45,431
Receptionist 28,901 1 28,901 1 28,901
Computer prog 50,368 2 100,738 2 100,736
Desktop speclalist 50,368 1 50,388 1 50,368
Mobile data spec 50,368 1 50,368 1 50,368
Crime prev pract 42,064 1 42,084 1 42,064
Crime analyst 39,880 2 79,920 2 79,920
Clerk I 32,286 6 193,776 6 193,776
Property facil supv 43,858 1 43,858 1 43,858
Property specialist 41,314 3 123,942 3 123,942
Network analyst 58,135 1 56,135 L 0.1..35
Totai Support Pers4nnel • 23 1,127,639 23 1,127,639
[1tLaint & OQer - Suoport Services
Overtime 14,800 14,800
Supplies 21,000 21,000
Minor equip 49,000 49,000
Services 30,000 30,000
Training 200,000 165,000
Fleet services 200,000 185,000
Facilities 41,042 41,042
Risk managemeM 300,000 275,000
Worlcers oomp 200,000 180,000
Miscellaneous Z5QQQ 65.0Q0
1,130,842 1,025,842
Salary/Benefits 1,474,115 1,460,530
Maint 8 Oper 1,130,842 1.025.842
TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICES 2,604,957 2,486,372
" The council may decide that several of the support personnel
may not be needed on Day-One of the departmenYs start-up
thereby reducing ihe first year costs.
Page 4
. Spokane Vailey Police Department 11/24/2002 2:21 PM
SCEMARtO 1 SCEiVAR10 II
INTFROGFN-CX CONTRACTS
~ou,nlX contrads Ies i matesl f 1)
Crime check 250,000 250,000 .
IdenUcrime scene 150,000 150,000
Dispatch 1=0- SO.OQO
Total 950,000 950,000
City of Saokane conrtraalzoatimatW
Recorcis , 220,000 220,000
CAD/RMS 175_00Q 175.000
Total 395,000 395,000
TOTAL CONTRACTS 1,345,000 1,345,000
ESTIMA-TEL~ RF~/~N!~F~
Impound fees 10,000 10,040
Alann fees 10,000 10,000
Protection services fees 10,000 10,000
Grants 450,000 450,000
Forfeit 8 Contributions 100,000 100,000
DUI cost recovery 40,000 90,000
Traffic violation revenues 797,25-8- 224sal
TOTAL REVENUES 1,417,258 1,068,629
DEPARTtV1EfdT TOTALS 11,741,547 10,634,587
('1) Jaii casls are no1 included because we have no way to esimate them and they do not
appear anywhere in the Sheriff s propos6d contrad as a separate item.
Page 5
' City oi Spokane Valley Police Qepartment 11/25/2002
Feasibility Study
- Staff Budget Comparisons
. e' s Contract ~ okane Valiev Police Department
1.25/1,000= 103 1.25/1,000= 103 1.5/1,000= 124
Salary # Total Salary # Total # Total
Chief 112,576 1 112,576 1 112,576
Captain 130,587 1.5 195,881 103,283 2206,586 3 309,879
Lieutenant 128,801 4 515,204 89,708 6 538,248 5 448,540
Sefgeant 117,699 9.5 1,118,141 81,061 16 1,296,976 17 1,378,037
DeUCorp 110,434 18.5 2,043,029 75,899 9 683,081 10 758,980
Poiice OfF 97,890 69.5 V89.4a 62,376 §1 4,301944 5,40-9_088
Total Sworn 103 10,681,709 103 7,141,421 124 8,497,110
LESU 1,120,006
CiVllians inGuded 32 1,487,249 31 1,424,153
C011tf2CfS inGuded 1,345,000 1,345,000
M& O included 1,688,504 1,851,500
Revenues inctuded (9,068,629) (1,417,258)
Bldg Expense 41 •Q42 41.042 41.042
TotalOverhead L161.048 3,493.16s 3244.437
Total Annual Cost 11,822,757 10,634,587 11,741,547
Capital Outlay Budget Comparisons
Sheriff s Contract ~akart~Valle.y Police [?epartment
1.2511,000 1.25/9 ,000 1.5/1,000
Purchase Facility (•1) 180,537 180,537 180,537
Vehicles (*2) o (-3) 551,388 (-a) 780,156
CofTlputefs. ("5) 0 (-8) 29,161 (R7) 31,812
Tefephone System 25..00.0 . 25-001
Total Capital Outlay 1$0,537 786,086 1,017,505
("1) Per Sheriffs pmposal, page 5. Atsfl see "Facility" on next page.
(*2) Financed 3 years @ 4% iMerest
('3) 25 new Crown Victorias, 4-4WD, and 24 2002 Dodge Intrepid or equal
("4) 31 new Crown vctorias, 4-4WD, and 27 . 2002 Dodge intrepid ar equal
("5) Financed 5 years @ 4°k interest
(116) 1 Server, 63 Desktops, and 27 Laptops
(*7) 1 Server, 67 Desktops, and 31 Laptops
Page 6
• Gity of Spokane Valley Police Oepartment 11/25f2002
Other One-time Costs
Uniforms, including handguns and equipment, less the uniform allowance in the benefit
package will have an initial cost of $394,444 for the Scenario I and $327,643 for Scenario 11.
Facility costs, other than for our share of the Sheriffs Precinct, are not included.
Eventually, our department wiU require at least 30,000 square feet of building space,
plus adequate outdoor parking and vehicle storage. For safety"s sake, this building
should not be part of a City Hall but could be combined in a building housing other
emergency services such as a City Fire Department and EMS.
We did not include starting our own CAD/RMS and Dispatch in our study. FCC
frequency allotments in the VHF range are unavailable except through the Sheriffs
Department. We could obtain UHF frequencies but then our officers could not
communicate directly with the other cities and the sheriff cars. This is something
your Chief of Police will have to work out.
The vehictes inGude approximately $10,000 in equipment costs in each patrol car
and $3,000 in each unmarked car that can be reused when the vehicle is replaced.
Step vans for use by SWAT, TAC, Meth Team, etc will probably eventually be needed.
Low mileage, late model vans can be purchased for around $20,000.
Page 7
City of Spokane Valley Police Department 11125/2002
, OPT10NA1_ OPESATIONB r(1ST C MPARISQN
Sheriffs Cont= Cib DQqartment
# EmpIg,vees ulid giass jfiotiQ,n Cost ~ Cost Dj~e«nce
1 K-9 (Dnig) 1 Deputy/PO 97,690 162,376
3 DARE 3 Deputy/PO 293,070 3 187,128
3 SRO 3 Deputy/PO 293,070 3 293,070
revenue (57,291) (57,291)
1 Comm Serv .5 Lieutenant 64,400 1 63,036 (Civilian)
.5 Deputy 48,845
12.5 Traffic .5 Lieutenant 64,400
1 Sergeant 117,699 1 81,061
0 Corporal 0 1 75,899
11 Deputy/PO 1,074,588 10 623,760
revenue (100,000) (100,000)
$7.22$._ (tU1&0)
20.5 Proposed Optional Level 1,895,471 20 1,316,395 (580,076)
Qptions the Council May Wish to Consider
Assuming you plan to initialty contract with the county for !aw enforcemeni:
Have a 90 day csncellation clause so you can negotiaie changes or siart our own department.
Hire your own Chief of Police to monitor the contrad and when the time comes, he/she will
already be in ptace. You may also wish to negotiate with the county to have operational
supervision of contract personnet.
Excercise the option to contract only for the Basic Contract and hire the "Optional Operations"
staff above as city employees end save the $580,076 difference.
The "Scenarios" we are submitting presume contracting for Dispatch and Recorcls Management
functions. You and your managemerrt team may weN consitfer having our staff provide those
services for the sake of locel control. The costs would probabfy be less but there is an advantage
to having our records in the same data base as the County and City of Spokane.
We understartd that new cities are etigible forgrants of various types to offset many of our
initial expenses. These shoutd be vigorousty pursued.
The county may be wifling to sell same equipmerit to us at a reasonable price that wovld no
longer be needecl by them. Maybe tney would be willing to give it to us since we probably
paid for it.
Page 8
Spokaine V_ ey Poi•ce Department
.
Capita1 Bud,~~ ~easibi~ty Study
~
;
i1
' L . - ~ , - . y '
- t•~ I ~
. . ~
Law ~~~emm:~ ~ransiti~ ~~C-omErO~
~ ~~~townt
_ 49_
Y
'y • ~ ' -
INTRODUCTION
The Capital Budget was researched and prepared by the Law Enforcement Sub -
Committee assigned to develop a municipal police department for the City of Spokane
Valley. The Maintenance and Operation Budget for a municipal police department was
presented by Bob Lincoln on September 26, 2002, and is included in this report as
Appendix A.
The Capital budget is intended solely as a reference guide for the Spokane Valley City
Council to utilize in determining the feasibility and desirability of forming a municipal
police department and for comparative purposes. Clearly the single largest impact on
this budget would be the level of service provided to ths City of Spokane Valley
(number of personnel, specialized services such as DARE, School Resource Officers,
SWATIMeth TeamlTactical Unit capabilities, etc.). Therefore, when practical, we have
utilized figures for Scenarios I and II (103 and 125 officers) from the Operations
Budget (see Appendix A). 'While the Committee spent a great deal of time and effort in researching and
preparing this Capital Budget, it must be understofld that the formation of a police
department is extremely complex, with a myriad of subjective and objective variables.
It should also be noted that line items in the budget will vary significantly based on
point in time and other factors, such as; availability of grants (which could be
substantial and should be vigorously pursued), potential for joint purchasinglventures
and contractual agreements. The attached budget, therefore, should not be viewed as an absolute budget proposal, but as an informational proto-type for use in determining
the feasibility of creating a municipal police department.
If the Spokane Valley City Council determines the potential viability of creating a
municipal police department, it is understood that at that point in time an in depth and
detailed capital budget would need to be researched and developed. For example,
wnile furnishings were included in the cost of a new police facility (see Appendix F),
other equipment, such as; computers/printers, telephone system and office equipment
have not been calculated.
i-
"Make our Own Law Enforcement Agency Sub-Committes Members"
Fred J. Burns, Chairman dorfordediqacom.net (509) 228-9265
Patty Plotzki, Secretary qtpit a(~.aol.com (509) 742-8130
Cliff Cook, Federal L.E. (Ret.) choosakan eaol.com (509) 921-9138
Inez Hodge, S. P. D. Statistician (509) 622-5853 Home: (509) 928-6588
Ozzie Knezavich, S.C.S.O. (509) 924-3917
Jerry Lane, Lincoln C0. SO.(Ret.) laneinvestehotmail.com (509) 370-7574
Tad Leach, L. E. Consultant leachconsultant(cr~aol.com (208) 765-193
Bob Lincoln, S.P.D. Planning blincoln(@sookanepolice.ora (509) 835-521
Will Long, S.C.S.O. Reserve Debralon4(a~icehouse.net (509) 922-4442
Dean Meyer, S.C.S.O. Deputy dus38(@,cs.com (509) 891-7087
Raymond J. Seely rseelv9434cc{~aol.com (509) 926-5463
. -ii-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction i & ii
Table of Contents iii & iv
Budget Summary 1-3
Appendix
Maintenance and Operations Budget (9/26/02) A
Uniforms B
Officer Equipment C
Police Vehicles D
Weapons E
Facility F
Police Facility F1-3
Availability of Current Buildings and Vacant Land on
East Sprague F4
- iii -
Computer Aided Dispatch/ Record Management System
(CAD/RMS) G
Radio/Dispatch H
Commodities/MaterialslExpendables I
CAPITAL BUDGET SUMMARY
Uniforms (Appendix B)
$ 234,716.40 - $ 286,225.00
(103 Officers) (125 Officers)
Officer Equipment (Appendix C)
$ 88, 753.04 107, 710. 00
(103 Officers) (125 Officers)
Police Vehicles (Appendix D)
Patrol & Traffic Units $ 1,3891440.00
Investigations Unit $ 673,552.00
Support Services & Admin. $ 3110040.00
Weapons (Appendix E)
Handguns $ 50,882.00 - $ 61,750.00
(103 Officers) (125 Officers)
Rifles $ 43,115.80 (125 Officers)
-1 -
Shotguns $ 24,180.00 (125 Officers)
FACI LITY (Appendix F)
Build New $ 5,134,500.00 - $ 5,545,970.00
(Plus Land)
Remodel $ 31596,615.00 - $ 3,881,800.00
(Plus Land and Existing Bldg)
COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH/RECORD
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CADIRMS) (Appendix G)
Option #1 - Contract With S.C.S.D./S.P.D.
To be determined
Option #2 - Purchase New PRC System
$ 2,3000,000
Option #3 - Purchase New Spillman Systern
$ 425,000 + - $516,300 +
RADIOIDISPATCH (Appendix H)
Option #1 - Purchase Entire Radio System
Mobile Radios $ 223,300 (125 officers)
Portable Radios $ 154,500 - $ 187,500
(103 4fficers) (125 officers)
Base Stations and Ancillary Equipment
(To Be Determined)
-2-
Option #2 - Contract With Spokane County
(To be determined)
COMMODITIES/MATERIALS/EXPENDABLES
(Appendix I)
Expendables/Materials $ 82,000
Commodities $ 21,000
-3-
~
~
r
' C
cz
~ c
C
~
~
r-
~
Snokane Valley Police DepartmEnt
1?easibi.lify Study
Operations Budget Scenarios
as/a6ial)
, Salary assumptions
Scenario I (1.5/1000) ............................................................4
Scenario (f (1.3/1000) 10
~ Comparisons ......................................................................16
M8c0 ...............................................19
Revenucs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...20
The intent of these operating budgets is to provide data to the new counei I in order for
them to make an informed decisian as to the feasibilitv of operatinD a Spokane Valley
Police Department. [t is understoocl that the arganizational structwe in this model will be
subject to chan-e depenciing. on the new police chief, the city manacyer, and the city
council. No cnntact has been made with the County or thc City of Spoi:ane concerning
possible contracts for some ftinctions in these draft scenarios.
Estimates of a Capital budget are scparate from these operating budgets.
1
Spokane Valley Police Uepartment Operations Budget
1. Sworn Staff:
Poaulation 82.000 85,000 57.000
1.211000 98 142 104
I.3/1000 107 110 113
1.5/1000 123 127 130
1.3/1000 148 153 157
2.0/1000 164 170 174
(1.2 sworn personnel per 1,000 population)
2001 S:ilarv Survev of Comaarable Washiugton Cities
i'.O. Del/C4rnoi-a1 Serueant Lievtectant
Bellingham (67,000) 41,940 - 53,964 53,443 -56,712 59,592 - 63,223 73,608
Everctt (91,000) 43,080 - 56,484 69:996 82,968 - 86,448
Fcdcral Way (83,000) 41,244 - 55,344 54,043 - 72,492
9:Ent (80,000) 43,356 - 56,460 66;582 77,628
Yakima (72,fl00) 38,460 - 52,080 56,508 - 59,340 59,904 - 72,840
Average 4 t,616 - 54,866 53,448 -56,712 58,050 - 64,865 65,640 - 76,603
SPD 32,344 ->6,125 56,981 - 62,682 64,248 - 70,679 76,003
SCSO 37,521 - 50,636 51,781 - 57,220 56,992 - 62,977 69,176 - 76,442
Caotain Chief
Belliagham (67,000) 90,048
Fverett(911000) 39,412 -42,892 77,428-101,340
Federal Way (33,000) 66,523 - 78;528 82,572 - 104,460
Kent (30,000) 35,536 104,230
Yakima (72,000) 66,060 - 84,244 72,940 - 88,476
Average 74,000 - 84,300 77,780 - 97,720
S?D 87,383 37,884 - 107,845
SCSO 31,570 - 90,138 92,000
Estimated averaie salaries i- benefits for Sookane Vallev l82,0001
Vallcy PD
% oECnma. Low a<<e. SCSO Median Salaries Benefits ToEal
Chief +15% 92,000 90,000 22,576 112,576
Capt. +10% 85,354 81,432 21,361 103,293
Lt. +5% 72,309 65,904 20,304 39,703
Sgt. +5% 59,984 60,928 20,133 31,061
Corp. ~5% 54;500 56,167 19,732 75,399
A.O. +5% 44,078 43.697 18,679 62.376
(benefits on average are approximately 25°l0 of total package)
1)
11. Professional Support StaCf
(;itv af Sookane Salarv Survev 2001
Benefiis
Salarv (low end of salarv) 'I'otal
Police Admin Superv 62,869 - 73,342 13,450 8 020
. rlccountant f I I 49,486 - 61,429 16,402 65,888
Comp. tNetwork Actmin 49,486-61,429 16,402 65,$88
Comp Senior Analyst 47,063 - 58,563 16,033 63,096
. Police Records Managcr 47,063 - 58,568 16,033 63,696
Police (nfo Coordinator 47,063 - 58,568 16,033 63,096
AccoLmtant f I 42;407 -52,784 15,320 57,272
\elwark Ansslyst 41,300 - 51,427 14,835 56,135
GiS programmer 39,171 -43,755 14,825 53,996
Adrnin Assistant 35,210-47,523 14,673 52,333
Comp Syst. Admin 3$,210-47,532 14,678 52,588
Dispatcher Super 37,98 52,137 14,340 52,321
Accountant 1 36,268 - 45,122 14,699 50,368
Comp. Oper Spec 36,268 - 45,122 14,099 50.368
Prog.Analysc 36;268-45,122 14,099 50,368
Deskrop Comp Spec fl 36,268 -45,122 t4,099 50,368
Police Dispatcher 111 33,969 - 46,666 13,767 47,676
Secretary 3 1,904 - 39,583 13,527 45,431
Police pispatchG-r 11 30,861 - 41,196 13,329 44,190
Property Facilities Super 30,563 -40,048 13,290 43,858
Crime Prev. Pract 24,002 -37,751 13,062 405;
Police Propercy Spee 23,355 - 36;999 12,959 41,314
Desk4op Comp Spec f 27,165 - 35,606 12,795 39,960
Crime Analyst 27,165 - 35,600 12,795 39,960
Storekeeper 26,559 - 34,786 12,705 39,264
Police vispatcher [ 25,954 - 33,951 12,615 38,569
Police Rec. Shift Supcr 25,954 - 33,95 I 12,615 38,569
CIer1: 1 V 25,934 - 33,951 12,615 38,569
Clerk 111 24,221 -31,842 12,444 36,715
Aceounting clerk 24,221 -31,842 12,494 36,713
Data entry Tech I11 24,221 - 31,842 12,494 36,715
Police Records Spec 23,469 - 30,389 12,266 35,735
Data entry Tech tl 22,696 - 29,587 12,149 34,846
Clerk 1( 22,696 -29,587 12,149 34,546
Clerk 1 20,462 - 25,557 11,834 32,296
Data c-ntry tech l 20,462 - 25,557 11,334 32,296
Recepiianist 17,456 - 21,778 11,445 28,901
-
(For City of Spokane VaIley PD, the lowest salarv in each range was usec!)
~
~
SCENARIO L• 1.5/1000 sworn (124 sworn)
9 sworn % of total
Chiefs ofFc,z 3 l%
Patro I 75 60%
(mestigations 31 25%
Support $ervices 4 4%
Traff c I I 10%
Total 124 100%
. tiNtF012►V( BUREAU
Patrol Division (75 sworn) (2 professional support staff)
1 Capc.
l Secretary
! Clerk [1[
1 Lt.
i s` sh i ft: (a 700-1740)
Team i Team 2
Sgt. 1 1
Garp. 1 I
P.O. b 6
2ee Sllift: (l i00-2 f40)
Team 3 Tcam 4
Sgt. l I
Corp. ! I
P.O. 7 7
I Lt.
3`d shiR: (1700-0340)
Tearn 5 Team 6
S gt. 1 l
Corp. 1 l
P.O. 7 7
4'' shift: (2100-0740)
Tcam 7 '1"eactt 8
Sgt. , I 1
Corp, I !
P.O. 7 7
K-9
P.O. 2
Sworn Salarv + Benefits
Capt_ 103,293 x l= 103?93
,
i.,t. 89,703 x 2a 179,416
Sgt. 31,061 x 3= 648,488
Corp. 75,899 x 8= 607,192
P.0. 62,376 x 56= 3,493.056
75 5,031,445
4
f'rof, Suoaort staff $afarv + [ienefits
Secretary 45,431 x I= 45,431
Clerk 111 36,715 x 1= 36,715
2 $2,146
Salary+genefits Patrol Div. 5,113,591
M&O Patrol
Overtime/Add 240,900
Supplies 7,500
, Minor Equip. 17,500
. Secvices 25,000
290,90(1
PaTROL DIVISIOlY' Total SalaryBenefits + M&O 5,404,491
Traffic Units (1 i sworn) (I Prof. Suppar[ staff}
i Srt.
I cierk
Team I Team 2
P.O. a 4
Carp. (Accident reconscruction) I t
Sworn Salarv + beneFu
Sgt. 81,061 x I= S 1,06 I
P.O. 62,376 x 8= 499,003
Gorp 75,399 x 2= 151,798
11 731,867
Prof. Suqoort staff Salarv + benefits
Clerk l 32,296 x l= 32,296
Salary + benefits Trafric units: 764,163
M&O Traffic units
OvertimelAdd 35,500
Supplies 4,500 .
iMinor Equip. 10,500
Serviccs 15.000
65,500
Traffic uniis Total SalAryBenefits ~ YI&O 829,663
Additional Uniform Bureau M&O
TAC (crowd controi) $,000
. EDLf (explosive disposal) 4,000
SWAT 40,000
K-9 10 000
62,000
Sa l a ry/Bcnefits 5,877,754
M&O 418,400
T'OTAL UNIFORM BUREAU 6,296,154
~
Prof. Suooort staff Salarv r Beriefics
Secretary 45,4; i x l= 45,431
Clerl:Ilf 36,715 x I= 36,7I5
2 32,146
Salary+l3enc(ifs Patrol Div. 5,113,591
M&O Patrol
OvertimelAdd 340,900
S«ppl ies 7.500
tilinur Equip. 17,500
Services 25,000
290.900 ~
PATf20L D1V1S101`° TOtJI SaIJrylBenefits + s11&d 5,404,491
Traffic Units I sworn) (I Prof: Suppnrt stafl)
1 Sgt.
I elerk
Teaiii 1 1'eam 2
P.O. 4 4
Corp. (Accident ceconsiruc[ion) 1 !
Sworn Salarv + bene(its
Sgt. 81,061 x I= 31,061
P.O. 02,370 x S = 494,008
Corp 75,899 r 2= 151,793
11 731,367
Prot. Cupoort staff Salarv + benefics
Clerk [ 32,296 x I= 32,296
Salary + bcucfits TraIIie units: 764,163
M&O Traffic units
Overiime/Add 35,500
St!Pplies 4,500 .
iMinor Equip. 10,300
$ervices 15,000
65,500
Traf7ic uriits Total SalaryBenefits'- Vl&O 829,663
Additional Unifarm Bureau M&O
TAC (crowd control) 3,000
EiaU (explasive disposal) 4,000
$1NAl' 40,000
K-9 10,000
62,00()
SalaryBenefits 5,377.754
►N1&O 413,400
TUTAL CENTFORM C3UREAU 6,396,154
:
fNVESTiGAT[QNS AURFAU (31 sworn) Profcssipnal suFQoTE staff)
i Capt_
1 Lt.
vtajor Crimes 1 Sgt 1 5 PO + i Cierl I
Sexual Assaults 1 Ser + 5 PO Clerk I
D.V v I PO
I Lt.
Proprrry Crimrs 1 Sgt. 1 7 PO Y l Cleck l
SItJ (dru-!/gang) 1 Sgt. . 6 PO T I Clerk (
Sworn Salarv ~ benefits
C.apt_ 103,293 x I= 103,293
l.t. 89;708 x 2= 179,416
S~t. 51,061 x 4 Q 32~,2=t~t
PO 62.376 x 24 = 1.497,024
31 2,103,977
Prof. Suooort staff Salarv + benefits
Clerk 1 32.296 x J= 129,134
Salary + henefits: 2;233,161
~-IRO Inves6eations BureaLi
OvcrtimeJ,4dd 35,8(}0
Supplies 27,0(}0
Viinor Equip. 63,0(}0
Meth Tearn 100,000
Services 46.500
325,300
Salary/Fienefits 2,233,161
11~C0 325,300
TOTAL IYVESTIGATIOVS BUREAiJ 2,558,461
~
SIlPPOE2T SEI2VICES BUEtEA[J (4 sxorn) (23 ProF. Suppart siaff)
I Capt.
1 Secretary
l SEt - training, community 5erviCeS, a'irne preventiqn
I crime preventi4n prac[.
2 clerk [
I Set - fleet, special events, volunteer programs
2 c(erk I
1 Sgt. - crime aitialysis ? CTIITit' 3I'13l?st5
? clerk I
I i'olice Adminiscrativr supzrvisor
l receptianist
1 accouniani IE
I contrac4 specialist (elrrk 11)
1 grant specialist (clerk II)
1 pa}•TOII cicrk (clerk f)
t storekeeper
t personnel clerk (clerl: I)
I computer sr. analyst
l computer proo ammers
l desktop specialist
I Nfobile data specialisl (prograriimer ccale)
I Network analyst
1 property facilities supervisor
3 praperty specialists
Sworn Salarv = benefits
Capc. 103,293 x 1 = 103.293
Sg`. 81,061 x 3 ~ 241183
4 346,476
Professional staff Salarv Bencfts Total
Admin Super 62,569 18,430 31,320 x 1= 81,326
Accountant Il 42,407 15,320 57,272 x 1 = 57,272
Contraet spec. (clerk fl) 22,647 12,149 34,346 x l= 34,846
Crant spec. (clerl: 22,697 12,149 34,846 x t- 34,846
Pay7oll cferk (clerk t) 20,462 11,834 32,296 x t= 32,296
Storekeeper 25,559 12;705 39?64 x l° 39,264
Persoiialel clerk l 10,462 11,834 32,296 x 1= 32,296
Secretary 31,904 13;527 45,431 x 1= 45,431
Receptionist 17,456 11,445 23,901 x 1- 25,901
Computer prog. 36,269 14,099 50,363 x 2= 100.736
Desktop spcc. 36,269 14,099 50,368 x]_ 5368
Mobife daw spec 36,269 14,099 50,363 x I= 50.365
Crime prev. pract. 29,002 13,062 42:064 x i= 42,464
7
G•irne analyst 27,165 12,795 39,966 x 2- 79.920
Clerk I 20,462 11,834 32,296x 6= 193.776
Properry facilities super 30,365 13.290 43,354 x I- 43,35S
Property specialists 23,355 12,9.59 41,314 x 3= 123,942
Nenvork analysc 41,300 E4,335 56.135 x 1= 56.135
23 1,127,639
Satary + bcnetits: 1,474,115
yi&O Sttaaorc Services Bureau OvertimJAdd 14.800
Supplics 21,000
iklinor Equip. 49,000
Srrvices 30,000
Training 250.000
Ffeet services 500,000
Facilities 100.000
Risf: Manaeemenc 400,000
Workers Comp. 200,1700
ti•tisc. 100.000
Total Ni&O 1,664,300
SslaryBcnefits 1,474,115
vl c~c0 1.664.800
TOTAL SUE'E'ORT SCi FiVICC5 E3[TRCAU 3,138,915
nFFICE OF 'CF[E CFTTEF (3 swrorn) (2 professional support stafl)
Sworn salarv + benet~ts
1 Chief 112,576 x t n 112,576
I I,t. (Offiee of Profi: Standards) 39,703 x I= 89,708
I Sgt. Administrative 81,061 x 1- 81,061
3 283,345
Pcof suonort scaff salarv + benefits
Adrnin.Assistani 52,333 x i= 52,888
Salary + benefits: 336,233
Office of the Chief M&O
Suppl ies 2,400
Minor Equip 5,600
ServiCes 10_000
18,000
S:I IaI"y/B ene fits 336,233
~-I&O 18,000
TOT.aI.: Or HICE OF THE C[iIEF 334,233
3
nf;PARTM-E\''i' TOT:ILS
I'otal Dcpartmcnt Sworn salary + beneRts: 124 ~ 58,497.1 fQ 69':'0 124 86%
Total Dept Prof. support salary + bcnefiis: 31= 1.424.13 I?% 31 20%
Total Department salary+benefits: S9,921,263 156 100%
M&O: 2.426.,00 19%
Salary•/benefits & YISU: S12,347,763 100%
,f0int use/inter aeencv contraCtS cOSt estimates:
COuntv COWrnct
Crime checr 250,000
(cientlerime sccnc 150,000
pispacch 550,000
950,000
Citv of Sookane Contract
Records 220.000
CAD/R,yIS 175.000
395,000
To ta I S1,345,000
Cstimated Revenues
lrnpound fees 10,000
Alarm fees 10,000
Proiection services fees 10,000
Grants 450,000
Forieitures and contributions 100,000
l7Ul cost recoverv 40;000
"l"raffic violation revenues 797.258
Lcss revenues S1,417,258
Salary/benetits 9,921,263
rt&o 2,426,500
Interagenc}' contracts 1345.000
S13,692,763
' less revenues (1,417.258)
Total 512,275,505
9
SCENARIO II: 1.311000 sworn (1.07 sworn)
# sworn % of total
Chiefs of'iice 2 1%
Paerol 67 63%
invescigations 27 ?a
$upport Scrvicr5 4 4;/o
Traffic 7 7%
Tot11 107 100%
(1T'iFORM RIJREAU
Patral Division (57 sworn) (2 professional suppori staff)
I Capt,
t Seccetary
t Clerk ll E
I (.t.
15` shift: (0700-1740)
Tearn I Team ?
Sgt. I l
Corp. I l
P.O. 5 5
2"d shift: (1100-2I40)
Tc:am 3 Tram 4
Sgt. I i
Corp. 1 1
P.O. 6 G
! Lt.
3rd shift: (1700-0340)
'1'eam 5 `l'eam 6
SgE. l t
Corp. ! l
P.O. 6 fi
4i° shift: (2100-0740)
Team 7 Team 3
Sgt. I i
Corp. I ]
P.O. 6 6
K-9
P.O. 2
Sworn Salarv + Sene6ts
C3pt. 103,293 x 1= 103,293
LE. 39,708 x Z= 179,416
Sge. 81,061 x 8= 648,438
Corp. 75,899 x 8= 607,192
P.O. 62.376 xaS= 2.944,043
67 4,532,437
10
Prof. Sunport staff Salary + Bencfi[s
Secretary 45,431 x I- 45,431
Clerk f[I 36,715 x 1= 36,715
2 82,146
Salary + Benefits Patrol niv. 4,61 4,583
A9&0 Patrol
Overtirne/Add 215,204
Supplics 7,500
Nlinor Equip. 17,500
Scrvices 25.000
265,204
E'ATHOL D[VIS[Oi` Total Salarv/F3enefits +NI.CO 4,379,737
Traf(ic Units (7 stvorn) (I Prof. Suppart stati)
1 clerk
Team I
5gt. l
P.O. 5
Corp. I
Sworn Saiarv T benefics
Sgt. 81,061 x l= 81,061
Corp. 75,899 x ! = 75,899
P.O. 62,376 x5= 311.880
7 =368,340
Prof. 5unonrt siaff Salarv + benefits
Clerk I 32,296 x 1= 32,296
Salary T benefits Traffic uuits: 501,236
M&O Traffie uni[s
OvertimE;/Addit 25,000
S uppl i es 5,000
h-tinor Equip. 5,000
Se rv ices l 0,000
45,000
Traffic uoits Total SalarY/Beuefits + INISO 5546,136
Additional Uniform Bureau M&Q
TAC 8,000
E DU 4,000
S W'.AT 40,000
K-9 10,000
62,000
Salary/Benefits -5,115,719
M& O 372.204
TOTAI, UN1FOEtN1 13UKE.AU 5,437,923
!1
iIN'VF,S"I"[GAT[ONS sUfZE,AU (27 sHrorn) (4 ProFessional support staff)
I Capt.
1 Lt.
ytajor Crirnes 1 Sgt . 5 PO +1 CIPrk- I
Sexual Assaults I Set - 4 PO + f Clerk i
D.V. I PO
l t_l.
Property Crimrs I Sgt. + 5 PO 1 1 Cterk 1 _
S1U (drug
,/ganR) l SRt. y 3 PO + i CIer6: I
Sworn Salarv 1 benefits
Capt. 103,293 x I = 103,293
Lc. 39,708 x 2= 179,4116
Sut. 81,061 N 4 a 32~4,_'44
F'O 62,376 x 20 = 1,247.520
27 1,354,473
Prof. Suonort staff Salarv = benefits
Clerk l 32,296 x 4= 129,134
Salnry benefits: 1,933,657
.M8:0 lnves[ieaiions Bureau
OvertirnelAddit. 80,000
Suppiies 27,000
yteth Team 100,000
~vlinor Equip. 60,000
Scrvices 46.500
313,500
SalaryBenefits 1,933,657
~1~t&c0 313500
TpTAi INYESTIGATIONS 13URFAU 2,297,157
1 ?
SUPPORT SERVICCS DIVl51ON (4 sworn) (23 nraf. Support staEl)
I Lt.
1 Sgt - trzinine, coiiimunity services, trime prevention
1 crime orevention przct.
2 clcrk [
1 Sgt - tieet, speeial events, vofunteer programs
2 clcrk l
1 Sgt. - crime analysis
3 erimc anal}5ts
? clcrk I
I Police Adminisfrative supervisor
I secre?arv
l receptionist
1 accountant II
1 concract spccialist (cterk ll)
{ grant specillist (elerlft, f[)
1 payToll clerk (clerk I)
I storckeeper
I personnel clerk (clerk
t eomputcr sr. analyst '
1 computer programmers
1 desl:tap specialist
I h•tobile data spnialist (prograrnmer scale)
1 Netwark anal}5t
I properry facilities stlpervisar
3 property specialists
Sworn Salarv + benefits
(.,t. 89,708 x 1 = 59,703
Sgt. 81,061 x 3= 243.183
4 332,391
Professional staff Salarv Benefics Totaf
Admin Suprr 62,369 18,450 31,320 x I= 31.320
Accountant l( 42,407 15,320 57,272 x l= 57,272
CUntrnct spec. (clerk [I) 22,697 12,141 9 34,846 x! W 34,346
Grant sper. (clerk I!) 22,6517 12,149 34,346 x t= 34;846
Payroll clerk (clerk 20,462 11,834 32,296 x t= 32,296
Srorel:eiper 26,559 12;705 39,264 x 1= 39,264
Personnel clerk ! 20,462 11,834 32,296 x[= 32,296
Sccretary 3 1,904 13,527 45,431 x 1 a 4 -5,4 3E
Iteceptianist 17,456 l 1,44> 28,401 x 1= ?3,901
Computer prog. 36,269 14,099 50,368 x 2= 100.736
Desktop spec. 36:269 14,099 50,363 x 1 = 50.365
iMobile data spec 36,269 14,099 50.368 x!_ 50.368
Crirne pTev. pract. 39,002 13,062 42,064 x I= 42,064
13
Crime ana{yst 27,165 12,795 39,960 x2 = 79,930
Clerl: I 20,462 11,834 32,396 x 6= 193,776
Property facilities super 30,565 13,290 43,353 x I= 43,3s8
Property specialists 28,355 12,959 41,314 x 3 - 123,942
Network analyst 41,300 14,335 56,135 x I= 56,135
'3 1,127,639
Salary + benefits: 1,460,530
M&O SuoDort Services Qur;,au Overtime/Addit 14,800
Supplies 21.000
e4linor Equiy~. 49,000
Services 30,000
Training 215,000
Fleet servicis 425,000
Facilities I 0G,000
Risk Management 400,000
V1°orkers Camp. 180,000
Geelera[ adciit. Services 85.000
Toral ti1R4 1,519,:300
SalaryBenefits 1,460,530
YI&O 1.519.500
TpTala SUPYORT SE12VtCES BURFAU 2,980,330
OFPICE OF"f'HE CH1EP (2 swqrn) (2 professional support st311)
Sworn salarv = benefits
t Chief 112,576 e l= I 12,576
I Lt. OPS 89,70$ x I= 89.705
2 202,284
Prof sunoort staff salarv + benefits
Admin.Assistant 52,883 x 1= 52,383
Info. Coord. (rnedi3) ' 63,096 x I= 63,096
Z 115,934.
Salary + beneGts: 313,263
Oftice of the ChieP' Yt&O
Supplies 2,400
ivlinar equip 5,600
Services 10.000
13,000
$alaryBenefits 313T268
ivt&O 18.OtN)
"I°p'I'A1.. OFFICE OF TIiE CIiLEF 336,263
1~
U L C'ARTMFiYT TO'CALS
Total Qepartmcnc Sworn salary + benefits: 107 =S7,3g0,925 67°'0 107 77%
Total Dept PraC support salary t heneits: 32 = 1.437,249 13% 32 23"/0
Total I)epartment salary -f- benefits: $3,878,174 139 100°/4
NI&O: 2.223.504 211?/0
Salary/bcnefits & LNT&O: S 11,10 1,673 100%
.loint usclinter .1Qeney cantracts eost estimatcs:
Cnuntv C?ntract
Crime check 256,000
IdenUcriine scene 150,000
Dispatch 550,000
450,000
C.itv of Snokane Contract
Records 220.000
CA Dlltt'vlS 175.000
395.000
Tota I $1,345,000
Estimnted Rcvenucs
[mpound fees 10,000
Alsrm fees 10.000
Protection services fees 10,000
Gr•,uits 450,000
Forf'eicures and contributians 100,000
DUl cost recovery 90,000
Traffie violation revenues 398,629
Total S1,068,629
Salary/benefits 3,37$,174
!tit&O 2,223,504
InteragenCY cuntracts 1345,000
S 12,446,678
less revenues f1,068,6291
Total 511,378,U4'I
15
Comparisons
SCSO VA.LLEl' VALI,I:Y VALI.FY" VALLEY
Contract (1.5 /1,000) ('.-rev) (1.3 /1.000) (+rev)
pper. 13udget $ 11,624,407 Si 3,692,76.i $I 2,? 75,505 S I 2 L1=16;673 $I1,37S.049
Per capita $142 S 167 S150 $152 $139
Ofticers 103 124 124 107 107
Ol-Eicersl i Q00 1.23 1.5 1.3 1.3 I.,i
Perofficer 5112,353 S110,425 S93,996 S116,334 $106,337
Per emplo}^ec 587,774 $78,639 589,544 $31,856
(13ased on Spokanc Vallcy Population ai 82,000)
SCSO (103) Vallcv (124) ValleY (107)
Deputies/P0 69.5 39 73
Det/Corp 18.5 9 9
Seroeants 9.5 17 ! fi
Lieutenants 4.0 S 6
Captain5 l_5 3 2
Chicf I 1
103 I?4 l 0?
16
SCSp 103 Spokanc Valley PD 125 Spokanc Vallev PD l07
Patro! I Captain 1 Captain I Cantain
2 Lieutenan[ 2 Lieutenant 2 Licutenant
5.5 Sergeant S Sergeant S Sergeant
8 Corporal 3 Corporal
47 Deputies Wolice Officzr 46 Police 0fficers
55.5 7; bS
Traff ic .5 i.ieu[eneanc
I Sergeant t Sergeant I Sergeant
• ! Corporal ? CorDoral 1 Corporal
l t Deputies 3 Police Officers 5.police officecs
13.5 11 7
K_9 2.5 Deputies ? Police Officers 2 Policz Offiicers
fm-estieations .5 Captain I Capiain 1 Captain
l Licutenant 2 Lieu[en3nt 2 Lietttensnt
3 Sergeant 4 Sergeant 4 Sergeant
17.5 Dctcctives 24 t'olice OfFiccrs ?O Police Offiiczrs
2.5 Denutics
24.~ ~ 31 27
Comm. Scrv.,
Trainine, ficrt,
Special events,
Volunt. Services I Captsin
.3 Lieutenant t Lieu[enant
2 Sergeant 2 Sergeant
_5 Qepury
l 3 3
Crime analvsis 1 Sergeant I Sergeant
SRO 3 Depury
DA RE 3 Deputy
Office of Chief t Chief 1 Chief
I Lieutenant i Lieutenand
1 Srrgcant
3 ?
TOTAI, 103 124 107
17
SCSO (103) Vallev (125) ValleV (107)
$worn salaryibene.. 7,78 5,364 3,497,110 7,390,925
Overtime/Addit 303,435 330,000 335,004
yt&Q
Fuel 81,742 59;675 54.725
Fleei 324,467 400,325 340,275
Otl3er 111,961 1,926,500 I,343.500
2003 adjusted 569:034
Tech impravements 175,000
Poi-tion ofSheriffsalary 4,066
Crime check 2150,000 250,000
Ct10/R,41S 120,304 175,000 175;000 F orensicitdent 141,007 130,000 I 50,000
RaclioJdispatch 513;703 550,000 550.000
i'roplrecords 371,906 400,077 400,077
SCSO Admin Pub Safery Blcl,-.
(Valley PD Adrniti in Spok Yslley)
Sr. Admin 103.412
DudgeVaccount 133,179
OPS 48,101 89,705 39,703
Trai7inglpalygraph 175,512 in M&O in W&O
PIO 36,668 63,096
Crime Analysis 50,779 79,920 79,920
Clerical supaort 95.172
Other actmut 694,448 694.448
Total 11,154,407 13,092,763 12,446,678
Minus revenues (1,417.258) (1,063,629)
*Plus Caunty ovcnccad 627,373
**Less: (157.373)
TOTaL 511,624,407 S12,275,505 S11,378,049
Total prior co revenues 1 1,624,407 100% 13,692,763 10(}% 12,446,673 100%
Sworn salary/bcnefits (7.785.864) 67% (8.497.110) 62% (7.340.925) 60°/a
AII other exper►ses 3,338,543 33% 5,195,653 38% 5,0155,753 40%
Tocal after revenues 12,275,505 t00°lo 11,375,049 100°io
Sworn salarvlbenefits (3.497.110) 69% (7.390,925) 65%
All other expenses 3,778,393 31% 3,937,124 35%
+Counry ovecheZd. 627,373: is 5.d°/u of 11,624.407
# kUnable to re-concile with SCSO coritrae# propnsai
11,781,780
( f I .624.407)
157.373
18
Y[&Q
SUOkane Vallev {'D IZS Spokane VaIley PD 107
Fleet Services 500,000 ll% =125;000 lg°/a
OvertimelAdclit 330,000 16% 335,004 I S°/a
Facilities 100,000 4% 100,000 4':'o
Minar Lquip. 145,600 6°'0 137,100 6%
Servic€.s I26,500 5% 121,500 5%
100.000 4°/a 85,000 4%
Supp(ies 62,400 2°Jo 62,400 3%
'I'r:tining 250,000 10%'0 215,000 10°'0
'CAC 8,000 l% 3,000 1%
L"C7U 4,000 I% 4,000 f%
sWA•r 40,000 i% 40:000 i%
Risk Manarternem 4001000 16% 400;000 f 4°10
Workcrs Comp 200,000 3% 1801000 S%
K-9 10,000 I% 10,000 1%
MiCth "Ccam 100,000 4% 100.000 4%
S2,426,500 100% 52,223,504 100%
19
RF VEN[.f ES:
Crants SDoksne f'olice Dep3rnnent
[..I.EI3G 679,365
Domestic Violence 4,144,465
UHP 2?50,000
"('crn Driving 90,000
Juv. Accountabifi[y lncentive 9,362
Rscial Profiling Prevention 200,000
Property Crimes 509,000
(nternet Crimes Aeainst Chilcfren 45,000
Cops in $cliools 750,000
Project Safe Neighaorhoods 150,000
Schonl 7_one Eqnipme.nt 29,270
~tiieth 93,000
Cliek i4 or Ticlet 10,000
Kegger Patrols 7,560
Emphasis Patrol 5,400
QOC Gi•ant 35.000
59,062.922
Retail Sales and C.ise Ta.e 53,015,000
Motor Vehicle Criminal lustice Tax 762.732
$3,777,732
(F.etail sales and Use tax coulcl offset Jsil coses, which ve nat fac[orrd into diis bud5et.)
(Estimated annual jail bill approximately S:OQ,OQO)
Tratl'ic ViolAtion revenue to citv
Av;. ticket S36.00
J[S trauma fee:
City $4.84
Crime vic4irrE .08
PSEA(1-) 2.322
PSEA (2°") 3.62
11S account 12.09
Traurna fee 6.05
29.00 (29.00)
S57.00
Of the balanc° of $57.00, the ciry retains 56.26% or S32.07 +S4.84 = S36.91
Workeng days l30
l"icketSlday x 12
2,160
TrafFc officers x 10
Tickeu 21,600
Avg. tstimated rev. [u city per ticket S36.9 I
Rrv. ?o City ofSpokanc Valley $797,253
20
. ~
~
~ ~
~
~
APPENDIX B
UNIFORMS
This information was obtained from "Blumenthal Uniform"
1306 N. Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
(509) 323-1104
The owner "Mitch" has express-ed a big interest in working with the new City of
Spokane Valley and has many options available for purchasing equipment from fhem.
COST OF UNIFORM PER OFFICER
ITEM COST NUMBER NEEDED
Wool Pants $ 109.95 2
Wool SS Shirt 69.95 2
UVool LS Shirt 79.95 2
Winter Jump Suit 299.95
Summer Jump Suit 279.95
Duty Badges 102.00 2
WalJet Badge 41.50
Winter Coat 319.95
Boots 239.95
Baseball Cap 10.50
Uniform Patches 14.75 (2lshirt & coat = ~ @ $2,95)
Sewing Patches 7.50 (2/shirt & coat = 5@ 1.50)
Gloves 25.95
Ballistic Vest 629.00
Under Armor 47.95
TOTAL $ 2,278.80 Per Officer
TOTAL (103 Officers): $ 234,716.40
TOTAL (125 Officers): $ 286,225.00
-61-
Other Options Available:
There are many catalags advertising law enforcement uniforms and equipment such
as Gall's, Inc., 2680 Palumbo Drivej Lexington, KY 40509-1000, or www.galls.com.
A consideration in this matter would be the time of delivery and personal service that
might be required in obtaining colors of uniforms, types of badges, etc. that
Blumenthal's could offer first hand, instead of looking at a picture in a catalog. -B2-
,
+l~
c
APPENDIX C
OFFICER EQUIPMENT
Source of information: Blumenthal Unifarms.
COST OF EQUIPMENT NEEDED PER OFFICER
ITEM COST NUMBER NEEDED ,
Inner Pant Belt $ 18.95
Handcuff Case 56.00 (2 @ $28_00)
OC Spray 16.00
Flashlight ring 8.95
Baton ring 8.95
Asp Holder 29.00
Magazine Pouch 34.00
Radio Holder 25.95
Handcuffs 29.50
Duty Bag 49.95
Ticket book holder 27.95
Pocket RCW Criminal 7.95
Duty Belt 50.95
Holster 129.95
OC Holder 26.95
Flashlight (StreamLight) 124.99
Side Handle Baton 33.99
Asp 62.00
Belt Keepers 14.95 (5 @ $2.99)
Key Holder 21.95
Handcuffs 27.95
Drug Kit 24.95
Report Form holder 25.95
Pocket RClN Traffic 7.95
TOTAL $ 861.68 Per Officer
TOTAL (103 Officers): $ 88,753.04
TOTAL (125 Officers): $107,710.00
-C 1-
~~Ut11C~. VEH:CLES
` ~
APPENDIX D
POLICE VEHICLES
Price per new stripped down car obtained through State bid; $20,336 -
Cost ofi equipment and installing law enforcement equipment: light
bar, roll bar, shield, shotgun mount, MDC (Nlobile Data Computer) etc. 13,000
Studded tires for winter/car (Approx.) 400
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST PER VEHICLE (CAR ONLY): $ 33,736
(Including equipment and instaiiation)
Vehicles required for 125 officer scenario:
Number ofi Patrol and Traffic Unit vehicles: 42
This unit requires 24 Patrol Unit cars and 6 four-wheel drive vehicles. This is based
on having 18 cars on the street at all times due to shift overiaps. A total oT six cars
should be left in reserve to account for cars thaf are damaged or down for scheduled
service. In the event of "ice stormn scenarios there is a need for four-wheel drive
units, even in #he urban settings. The Traffic Unit would have 12 cars.
Cost: 36 patrol cars @$ 33,736 1,214,496
Cost: 6@ four-wheel drive vehicles @$ 43,736 174;944
TOTAL COST PATROL AND TRAFFIC UNIT VEHICLES 1,389,440
Number of Investi4ative Unit vehicles needed: 32
Each officer in the Investigative Unit needs their own vehicle due to the need ror them
to be on call and respond directly to crime scenes at all hours. Two pickup trucks
would be utitized for hauling large property. Each of these vehicles has specific
equipment needs. Vehicles for support services and investigative units could be either
bought as "used" or leased with options to buy initially. After the patrol cars acquire a
certain total of miles, they can be rotated down to the investigative and support
services units.
Cost: 30 investigative cars @$ 20,736 622,080
Cost: 2 pickup truclcs @$25,736 51,472
TOTAL COST INVESTIGATIONS UNIT VEHICLES 673,552
- D1 -
i
Number of Suaport Services and Administration vehicles: 15
TOTAL COST SUPPORT SERVICES AND ADMINISTRATIVE VEHICLES: $ 311,040
(15 @ $ 20,736)
Additional Specialty Units vehicles (as required):
DARE Program: 3
School Resource Officers: 3
SCOPE vehicles: 5
K-9: 2
Meth Lab Team:
1@ Van for lab processing equipment.
1@ Van for Meth Team transportation and deployment.
1 @ Surveillance van.
SWAT:
1@ Van to deploy SWAT Team.
1@ Vehicle to deploy Marksmen/Advanced units.
1@ APC (Armored Personnel Carrier) to deploy SWAT Team.
TAC/Riot Team: Potential need for vehicle/s.
NOTE: The need for these vehicles is contingent upon such variables as; the ability to
participate in joint agreements/contracts for service in these areas and the decision of
the Spokane Valley City Council as to what level of service to provide to the
community.
While new vehicles potentially purchased through State bid were utilized in this
appendix, other viable options exist, including; leasing, lease/purchase and used
vehicles.
D2
i
I
0
~
~
~
APPENDIX E
WEAPONS
Purchase price for the Glock Model 21 was obtained from GW, Inc. (Gunarama). This
is a company in Spokane that has worked with most law enforcement agencies in .
Eastern Washington.
Glock Modef 21
45 acp
Trijicon Nite Sites
. (3) -13 round high capacity magazines
Ti otal $494.00 each
TOTAL (103 Officers): $ 50,882.00
TOTAL (125 Officers): $ 51,750.00
Colt AR-15 Model AR6721
Purchase price vras obtained from "Specialized Armament Warehouse".
(2) 20 round magazines
223 16 in 1/9 HBAR A3 Tactical
Flat Top with remavable carry handle
Sliding Stock
Total $829.15 each
TQTAL (125 Officers): $ 43,115.80 (A)
,
Mossberg 12 gauge shotgun
Mociel 59QA1
Price obtained from www.mossberq
6 shot capacity
18.5" bead
Speedfeed
Cataiog #51410
Totai (suggested retail) $465.00
TOTAL (125 Officers): $ 24,180 (A)
E1-
(A) Assumes equipping all 42 Pairol and Traffic Uni# vehicles and 10 Investigations
Unit vehicles.
NOTE: It is believed that these weapans could be abtained a# significantly reduced
prices tnrough state bid, joint purchasing andlor the ability to negotiate a reduced price
due to the large purchase. -E2-
I
APPENDIX F
FAClLITY
TO: Spokane Vallev Law Enforcement Committee
DATF: Au;ust 22; 2002
SLFB.fECT: Police Facility
Dale Hickman, AIA., Arincipal with H?A Architects, P.A. in Coeur d'Alene, was involve.d with
thc needs assessments, design and construction of the Coeur d"rllene Police Department
1 aeility (completcd in 1999) and the Post Falls Police Facility (currently under construction).
Understandably, there are a myriad of variables, however, Ivlr. Hickman was most hE[pFul in
providing sqme general and "ball park" figures and insight. Some of the variables include;
land prices, site preparation, f'acility requirements (communications ar.d jaiUholding ceils are
significantly more expensive than office space) and bids (highly ciependant on the economy).
vlr. Hickman's projectinns were intentionally conservative. .
r\s police buildings are "Essential Facilities" under the Uniform Buiidina Code, they require
upgrading for seismic reyuirements. Thercfore, remodeling would require reinforccment oE'
walls and the roof, pnmarily. Remodeting of an existing building still requires about 75% of
the construction costs of a new facility (perraps more if the existing building requires
extensive dernolition of an existing interior). Construction costs in Washinzon are son,ewbat
hi(yher than Idaho, due to the 7 Yz % sales tax nn the entire project, versus 5% un materials only
in Idaho. L,and valucs of existing buildings on main thoroughfares are cleaely more expensive
than property located elsewhere.
Utilizine total personnel oF ISS (I25 stivorn), Mr. Hickman felt the size ofa poliee facility
would range from 23,600 - 32,250 square feet. N4TE: This does riot inciude any room far
fiiture arowth. The Post Falls facility was designed fnr personnel needs throuah the year 2015.
It is hi,hly recommended that any future need for additional personnef be taken into
consideration when determinin~ police facility needs.
Prudent use of space, consolidation of functions and multiple usage; can reduce the overall
spacc requireirients and assoeiated costs. For example, in Lincolnwood, the Police, Fire arjd
Emer4ency vledical Services were hoLIsed in ene building. We shared a common Training
Rnom; wllich was also served as an Lmergency qperatin~~ Center and_Public L\,teetinv R.ooni.
The Physical Teainini, koam anci it's equipment were also shared by the three departmencs.
- F1 -
CURREN'i' PQ1:,ICE FACI'LITIES
Department Site improvement Costs Construction Costs t"(oer snuare foot of siie) lper s4uare foot of buildinO
Coeur d'Alene PD S2.15 (3.3 acres) $95.75
(1999)
21,400 sq. Ft. (designed for 90 emplayecs)
Post Falls PD S230 (4 acres) $108.40
(Currently under construction)
21,500 sq. fr(desi`ned fnr 75 employees)
ti'OTE_ Has cfispatch center.
* t Due to the economy at the timc bids were due, the construcrtion cosis for both
facilities was "very reasonable".
SPOI.'.aYE VAI.,LEY P4LICE FACL1.,iTX OP'TIONS
Build iNew Remodel
Land ? ?
Cristin~ buildin, DtNA ?
Siie preparaiion (1) y 230 sq. ft. (S 504,000) $100-125,000 (z)
Building constniction (3) S 1] S- 125.00 sq. ft. $ 86.25 - 93.75 sq ft (4)
"Soft costs "(5) S592,500 - 637,500 $406,875 - 440,625
Construction contin;encies $197,500 - 244,375 $155,970 - 163,905
(6)
Furniture, fixtures & $150,000 $150,000
Equipment (7)
Project concinJencies (s) S244,500 - 264,095 $171,270 - 134,$50
TO?AL 55,134,500 - 5,545,970 S31396,615 - 3,881,884
(Pfus land) (Plus ianci and builciinu)
-F2-
( I ) Assuming iA ttcres
(2) Dependina on exisLing parking, ti_ghting, iandscapisig, erc.
(a) Assuming 3e),004) square feet
(4) Could be more if extensive demalition oPan intceior is required,
(5) Permits. soil analysis, :irchitecture fees, iesting, se%ver L°: tivater hook-ups, site surve;°, ete.
(6) 5% for change orders. eic.
(7) Does rtnt include "specialized" equiprnciu sueh as radiu eyuipruent and toxver, jaiUholding cells, etc)
(3) Qverall confinJenc;° bised oci ~ener:tl I~~ck of liard facts ou this projcrt A°ain, it is importanc to understand that there are a lar`e number of variablcs and unknowns at
this point in t2me. The estimates by NIr. Hickrnan were, thereEore, conservative: with thc
exception chat iio pravisian was made: for any expaiision in the number of personriel. As the
police tacility has an extreme impact on the ability of lativ enforcemeni td perFArm their duties
and provide service to the community; it is highly recornmended thai due care be taken to assure
that professional quarters are provided.
Durinv a recent ride-alona with the Spokane Counry Sheriff s Department, T was able to see the
plan for ihe new Sheriff's Substation in the $pok3ne Valley. While this facility would nnt be
suf~icient for a municipal department required by the Spokane Valley, it could be a viable option.
The facility includes a courtroom, whicif potentially could be readily converted for addi[ional
space, Thiss along with a potential addition/s. could make a professional facility (NOTE: It
currently includes jaillholdin, cells, secure parkinU and security cameras). Timcly awailability
and potential financia( advanta~es in utilizing this building (assumin~ that incorporation ~~oiild
cnean some kind of pro-rated ;iivestjture of infra-strticture by the County, whereby the Cit_v of
Spokane V"alley could obtain the substation at little or no eost) eould bu advantageous ro the
City, as tivell as the County, since this facility is special purpose and would be hard to sell in it's
current conf guration.
-F3-
Availability of Current Buildings on East Sprague
Prices obtained August, 2002
1. K-Mar#
a. Lease onfy at $3.50 per square foot. Contains 87,405 square feet
b. $57,674 in taxes yearly (1) Wauld we be defierred?
c. Parking lot is owned by anQ#her individual. This would be a separate cost
2. Home Base building
a. On an "as-is" basis only. Lease optian only
b. 100,000 square feet which includes 8,500 of outside fencing
c. $500,499 per year to lease
(1) Needs a!ot of remodeling work (2) Only 2 bathrooms
(3) Has 277-480 voltage (good aption)
Availability of vacant land on East Sprague
1. Sprague and Herald
a. Has electricity, gas and water -
b. 8.3 acres available and is flat land
c. $6.50 per square foot. Approximately $2.375 million
d. Real estate agency has indicated the owners are °very willing" to bUild to suit.
2. Evergreen and Sprague (dental office & surrounding 3 acres) a. Will build to suit
b. $8.00 per square faot. Approximately $1.17 million
c. We would get 100 feet off af Evergreen and 130 fee# off of Sprague
Options Available:
We can buy land and build
We can buy a building and remodel
V11e can fease land only and have owner "build to suit"
Points to Consider:
Law enforcement will need at least 30,000 square feet
Should ccnsider room for growth in the future
Should law enforcement be in the same building as Ciiy Hall?
What advantage would there be in being separate?
1) Jail patrons not near public doing city transactions
What advantage would there be in being together?
1) Courts would be near jail for transporting prisoners to and from courf
-F4-
i
APPENDIX G
COiVIPUTER AfDED DISPATCH/RECORD
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (CAD/RMS) Option #1
PRC
Orem, Utah
This is the current existing system co-awned by the City of Spokane.and Spokane
County Sheriff Department. This option would be to contract -ior use of the current
sysfem the City oT Spokane and Spokane County Sheriffi Office currently. have. The
cosi of this participation wouid be determined through negotiations with the Spokane
County Sheriff Department and the City ofi Spokane
This computer operation is designed to recQrd a police call as soon as it is ca(led in to
Crime Check or is officer initiated. This information is stored into the CAD (Computer
aided Dispatch) system. This information will remain in CAD until it becomes a report.
Once it is a"report" the basic information from CAD will transfer to RMS (Records
Managemeni System). From there, in theory, it is supposed to be transmitted to the
proper units that v✓ould be interested. Example* Homicide report to Major Crimes Unit
electronically. All other subsequent investigations, findings and pertinent information
would be added to ihis report and will be "together' in the computer. This would include
any investigations the Major Crimes detective has reported. Because the courts are not
connected to this system, the final outcome of the incident is not detailed in RMS under
the investigative portion. It can be obtained under the same report numbEr by ioaking
up the suspect however.
Overall view of PRC is that it was initially purchased under such s#rict and detailed
requests that it has not been very functional in the past. The problem is fhat any
changes the departments have requested are big costs to them. PRC was very
agreeable in the purchase phase. Because the proper people were not available at the
fime, the system did not give out the information that was requested. An zxample thai
is still in the "needs work phase" is the investigative reports. At the time of purchase, it
was requested that Word Perfect 5.0 be obtained for the word processing program.
Because there have been giant strides in word processing programs since the initial
request, they are "stuck" with Ward Perfect 5.0 and it is not compatible with many of the
new programs that increase typing autput and efficiency. The cost of changing the
program is astronomical and remains a problem.
- G1 -
Oqtion #2
Purchase the "new and improved" PRC system that has become available is now more
"user friendly". Many of the programs you purchase can be "tweaked" by computer
aperators and this leads to less cost to the department.
At the time of this writing, there was a PRC representative in Spokane November 13,
2002, who spoke with a sub-committee member, who relayed the following
information:
!f we purchased the new PRC system they have out now.
CAD wauld cost: $750,000
RMS $750,000
This is the "bare bonesu system. Each additional program would be approximately
$300,000 extra. Each program has a cost. Examples af extra programs wauld
include but not limit themselves to:
1) Technical support .
2) Specialized searches.
3) Identifying names.
4) WACIC/NCIC/lll
5) Evidence tracking.
6} Property room programs
7) Citations.
8) Vehicle tracking.
9) Employee records.
The good part about the current PRC programs are that they have been developed as
"open architecture" where computer oriented people could go into the system and
develop some of their awn programs to fit their individual needs. The old PRC
systems were prohibitive of that.
-G2-
Option #3
Spillman
Lvgan, Utah
Defiinitions:
CAD - Computer Aided Dispatch.
RMS - Records Management System.
AVL - Auto Vehicle Locator.
PDA - Generally referred to as a palm pilot.
CDPD - Is a"data line" you can rent from AT & T and no towers.
It is currently $40/month/unit.
• Panasonic tough books are $7,000 (really the best).
Spillman's best quality is its support. You pay for it, but it gives you unlimited calls and
training. It currently does not have "open architecture". Any changes you want to be
made will be done by Spillman and is very expensive.
Main firame should be a Unix, IBM or Sun with a cost of aporoximately $25-30,000
(server).
Based on having 130 employees on the department:
You get the 1) Hub.
2) Name information module.
3) Property module.
4) Vehicle module.
5) Citations module.
6) CAD.
7) Geo base.
8) Access through CAD only (no convenient WACIC/NCIC/lll).
$240,000
12.500 (maintenancelsupporf by Spillmar)
TOTAL $252,500 (plus cost of additional modulels to be determined)
If you include the State link (you can get Access in the RMS side without having
to switch to CAD) This means convenient use of WACIC/NCIC/lll.
$325,000
8.800 (maintenance/support by Spillman)
TOTAL $343,800 (plus cost of additional module/s to be deterrriined)
- G3
MOBILE PRICING
Using 30 patrol cars as an average with 1) messaging 2) voiceless CAD (use fhe
computer) 3) and AVL
$115, 000
52,000 AVL
5,500 (Maintenance/support from Spillman)
TOTAL $172,500
witnaut AVL
$115, 000
16.000 (Maintenance/support from Spillman)
TOTAL $131,000
Maintenance and support are "free" the first year. The second year is when the cost
kicks in. The price may increase yearly, depending on how many enhancements they
may introduce and train for.
LEASING
Leases far 2, 3, 4, or 5 years. After the lease is over, you can buy fhe equipment for
$1.00
Example (ball park) 3 year contract $230,000 which would be $84,000/year
4 year contract $ 230,000 which would be $64,700/year
Can be broken down further.
Other Options Available:
There are numerous companies ready to present programs that they can offer to you as
a new law enforcement agency.
- G4
i~
e
~
0
~a
~
~
b
~
~
~
APPENDIX H
RADIO/DISPATCH
Option #1
Motorola
Representative: Keith Cook
Account Manager
467-5852 Fax:467-3255
e-mail; keith.w.cook@motorola_com
Currently there are 3 frequencies:
1) VHF 150-170 and Spokane County has them all. They are not private.
2) FCC - UHF 450 - open up.
3) 800 MGH (megahertz) frequency band,(this is the clearest frequency).
To obtain this frequency we would need:
a. Ta have at least 75 units (portables and Gars).
b. To renew license every 5 years (no cost to renew).
c. 6 months to get frequency granted (Motorola wculd help).
d. To fill out APCO form ($300).
e. To purchase each frequency for $750.
MDS means: Mobile Data System
1 mobile radio is $2,500 (does not include installation) NOTE: Installation is estimated
at $400
77 mobile radios @ $2,900 = $223,300
1 portable radio $1,500 (HT 1250 -$1,Q00 128 channels)
103 portable radios @ $1,500 = $154,500
125 portable radios @ $1,500 = $187,500
Base station or °repeater" cost: $15,000 per base station
$ 200-300 per month for site rental
If Motorola installed equipment in car they would have mainfenance contracts for ifems
To equip 1 car: $1,000 for installation charges
$6.400 for MDC equipment
$7,400
- H1 -
Time required for installation of 1 car is 8 hours per car.
E-mail received from Keith Cook - Motorola on 1212/02
°Attached is the document "Understanding Wireless Communications°. This document
pretty much gives you considerations for getting started. I thought this would be a good
document for your c4mmittee to review to get your arms around the scope of a project.
As discussed in our last meeting the following might help you get to a number of at least
the magnitude of it?
2- Base station or Repeater 15 K each
3- Dispatch Radio Console 40K - 60K per position
1 - CAD system 450 K to 1.5M
1 - RMS system 450 K to 1.5 M
? - Handheld portables 1 K- 2.5 K each
? - Mobiles 2.5 - 3.5 K each
? - Mobile data terminal - 6K
1 - Radio Network Controller - 75 K
1 - Data Base Station 15 K each
Add 40% of the total price to cover installation, optimization and project management.
This does not include any frequency coordination/licensing, paging equipment,
microwave, phone lines, site leases, towers, Uninterruptible Power Supplies, ongoing
maintenance, and etc."
Keith Cook
Account Manager
Motorola Inc.
(509) 467-5852
OptiOn #2
Contract with Spokane County for radio/dispatch only (which they have indicat4ed they
are not willing to rent or give to us separately).
Cost for participation would be determined through negotiations with the Spokane
County Sheriff Department.
Other options available:
There are a myriad of companies willing to work this out with the new City of the
Spokane Valley.
-H2-
i..
t
I~
,
APPENDIX I
COIVIMODIT1ESlfiIIATERIALS/EXPENDABLES
While commoditieslmaterials and expendables are normally incorporated into an
Operating Budget, establishing a new department would reQuire significant
expenditures for tnese items to commence initial operations. Therefore, these items
need to be incorporated into the Capital Budget for a new de,partment. While
significant research was done; therz are too many items to have speciTic pricing for
each one. This, along with ine faci that pricing varies signiTicantly by vendor, quantity
purchased and the potentia) far joint purchasing, it must be understood that the
figures are "ballpark". An attempt was made to be conservative in the estimates, so
as to eliminate the potential for surprises and tried to utilize qualify items for long-
term efficiency, effeciiveness and professionalism.
These figurES are based on providing initial and reserve supplies of commcditizs,
materials and expendables for #he iniiial three manths of ooeration. Arter thes2 iniiial
purchases to establish the department, replacement of consumed iter-is on an on-
going basis would be incflrporated into the annual Operating BudgEt.
EXPENDABLES/MATERIALS
Ammunition (Handgun, shofgun and rifle) $25,000
Chemical munitions (A) 10,000
Crime/accident scene materials (initial resRonse) (B) 1,500
Crime scenelaccident scene investigation (C) 10,000
Cameras and fiilm (D) 5,500
Firsf aid kits, equipment and supplies 10,000
Less-lethal munitions (E) 5,000
Miscellaneous (F) 15.000
TOTAL $82:400
COMMODITIES
Repart farms/office supplies (G) $10,000
Ticket boofcs 2,500
Miscellaneous 9.500
TOTAL $21,000
GRAND TOTAL $103.000
-11-
(A) Defensive Aerosol Weapons (personal issue and crowd control O.C.Spray and
tear gas).
(B) Flares, traffic cones, barrier tape, reflective vests, etc.
(C) Evidence Technician supplies (powders, lifit prints, containers, etc.)(includes the
onetime expense of the actual kits), protective suits, etc.
(D) Includes onetime expense to purchase cameras and related equipment.
(E) Includes onetime expense of less-lethal (kinetic energy) delivery systems.
(F) Various supplies and small items necessary to start police operations. (G) Includes onetime expense for form development.
~
-12- ,
• ~I
~
~oij`CIL
~ "14IN rrC) ~rMI+~ a[..t...
1l, Zt302
DE
- _ ~
. ~ ~
fS~
~<'•it ' ~tJ,~S~"'
~
-
~ • • '
a ~ - ~ • ~
' • ~ _ - -
~ ` •
- ~ ~
rt ~'z1
i
jj~ce
! "Olity
contrac
s
d 6sto
•
.
.
s,'; l,~..
.
~
f ~J
SCSII~.6'als
/
\
o ' d i ~ ~ ri~ne
:Fcost
o prbvid' quality
services'
1 cointhit 1 Conimunity e1 P1 .1~'.
6 • d . con§istent • ' !
yay 1 M: 1 pro I ' . .
1 d 1 comniunity
r
p •
-7C6~n 'An Ch6n
o * - op . . i i r p'ro.. .
o.contiv costs
Actkretitypaiticipa~ion in the p . - s ,
z:
Establishment , , ov6sight
•~Y':
committee
Z„ A
=r2
eatu r6 &-benefits'
0. =-ity to TailoT your Dcp. 1
o Capit4 Smn-Up o' 1.
1 1
Sam 0aNwximtcly$945.000ofconsmxtioccosL
~
S~vcs 1 p front costs of comnmnic=1o inftWucnrrc
D ♦ D Lt y
~r
I
~
2
!f ~
t~~
~
~
' i ~
~ a
_ _ ~ ~
~
a , ~
- ~7 ~
~ ~ ~ • ~
~
~ } ~
~ - / ~
f ~
' ~ , S' _ ~y. i
♦ ~ - ` " _ ~ ,
j9 1 ~ ~ r~'~i G
. ~ -
~ , _
~ r:. r.',
' • • i V
~y ~ ` `''N . ,
~`14r : ~"T~•+t+
~;;y` ~~~"7 - '
.~p'~. ~9 ` I ~ ~
~S `'I~x ~ r~i;~?'+. i . ,
'
1
t
1 I ~ . ~ . - ' ~
_ , r ~
I - .
~
an, - -
- &-Benefits
Full , c.,
U„ versus , . . s, hic
,a
kz"t r ♦-Rwr_t r
~ 'd in Sheiiff budg n s
t opponurtitics tD reduce co A
j,.
. 1
$u, .
• .
~
*Economies • K '
'l 0 d 1 • 1 ..1
Larp .oo offlocrs.
i `
Dqxrtise o, •d uiiits ~
=*ss the cndrc d
IP, tm
~ :
, ~:-Gui • • b'Pdncipa s
na c tO
4 Co . pr
feel o bifity toward and d• .
~ 4>
responsiveness . residents d offic
o •nt ~
1 exibility • 1 '
ievel / / ' 1 1 1
.
C 1d 1 1' priorities, . b
•t~ ,
/ 1 1 costi.
.
4
\ -
71
de
•
CMMY
pm
zed
. ~ .
i: -
SCS(),AiII
~
_ .r
• • .
Pmgrum
ess ~
staff,
-sex ~ fO, . u _
\ ~ Drtl a d t-,
D .n~~
Fame'
vit
•
Waw
.
_8e,rvices
~ i e Lev
. 1 mi Divisicn
41 D .Di_%isio
lfwhides p ~
niojoi
PPO
~
, p OW
T.Y
1an ~r
S~WAt d TAC ♦/-1 +
~
S
K~ .
.
.
. ~ „
• , ~
,
~ .
• ~ .
F1
~
~ •
~ . ~
~
- , •
_ ~ • ' -
5 ~'t
Fes
• •
~ ~
. - .
SCMCC5
SI"
o 4. • ~
1 Po ~v • ^ •
A
41~~
critm
ippwt
.~y ~ • ,
~•S
~
.r--~
'1,' • ~
r ~
r ~
1
~ ~ •
~
, ~v~F~~;~1fi,.4 ~ ~ ~
~ y, .
~
. • . -
*
its ~
.
pavol 0
,
Uttits'
llotw
~ • '
•
w" , ~
j
.5~.~
• ' Q Patro
•
01130; - _ •u•
.1 1 _
f ~ 4l
1 1'3A~I Z carbines, :1 ' Il:,t •
.
~
,
N~9
Unifdrm ' C P' •
Depufy Pusona.1-Equipment,
` uniflonm; t~
d r vigbi, •
r.
f Affimunitilil:
Handcuf6 d
Leather
di.o
_ c ~k
' t
3:
Unifbtmed Patrol
fik I
`
• \I 1 11 e 1
III
EqWpmeot
► o ~
/
boots,
_ -
i,
8
~ Uniform -o ' •
~
,
onst n
~
, . .,e
s
Total
plo,iter . o. ~
Frktion
qmp.
.
. ,1;';' ~
.
Blackbox ,
,
r~
o"', 7,
Uniforriied ' •
m:.
d ,
D.U.1 Intervent.
D.U.I. iiimrcmtio
ollisions"' 2,200
Biipyclc
+ e" `~3
:a L
770W to 93"A
-RU qi~n~ Undera& W ;
AD
• ' Q P •
T k
Tracking Dorti d Leif
73 Building Scafchcs and Trncks
a
Drug Ii~ 6 • d Jakt-
183 Scanihes wilh 116 Findti
:omb Dog; Lossn (Nilro,
1,769 Other Calls & Si-nice
' ' ,
Units
Scarch a d Rescue : oodhound• •
Cadavci i...
9
/ l .
o ' Q Patrol
Tr'aining re.
' .A
P, .
ob+ o ~
'N
1 OfFicers'
"1 1 Trzined O
fititiuctor b' ' p1 1' !
R/•y•
k 1 I 1 tiability
'Cy~tV
diform ~ d Patrol
'Ume
'o DARE :nd Schoo Reso" -all cs
lerm bvci 11 Public d
Schools
irl
r, , ~
Coinmunity Involvement; Paradcs, Safcty Faim
P..treii, Gro. . . q..
~
~
~ ~ Q P •
RD .
6i:p.ih
RWM
i
0
T ~
6 AdmInisattioni
' ,1. `
S\
10
• ~ Q P •
. r . on,.
~,J~6bood Wakh
" Nejoboftcel - ' C-irty
~'!•:r
orist ThTeat Asse~sment Pro yz . ,
ji.~ • ~
c
McGruff ePmgrm
~
Y ~
Uniformed • o
1' 1
Uscs o Conununity-Voluntecrs
C~ o
~
Enhanm Comywnlty!~volvcntcnI
m-
0 Nows JanWry ftough June 200
h
1 ong' wi
C~ffwtly 35 S tha fX
v~l(
C~
Uniformed • b
1 `
t,
SuOce
-
-
jr
S-Uiiy
Demls
r•f .
11
~
~ ~ : •
r - •
~ .
d
D. ,
Class
1AcMO'!!'
• ~
M,. .
~ -
• ~
~
. ' ~
Cri
•
Malov,
d
•
.
cilses
o
.`-Y i,
~
` ~
• ~ ~ ' _
Inve
~ - ~
op.
0
r ~
~u .
ous
t
610
6.
6.22 ~
~ d ~
► ~ °V",
.
~ .
,
~
~
es m6tions
D'd ri e1 Solcly 1
aWaymnts ~ .
'rim
L,•
c,:J
nt.F
orcd
T
~
Ovcr 630 Weirraht 1 date
{Y
gbbohs
0 Property (Zrimes Task Force
-
10 ' / rd Cases
} + `
~
25 1 I tA •
~
• 1s' li o
~
ants
\ y P 11 /
1 1
~ A. .
e is ig6tions
~~s i
q Kecip ' \ opal 11'
1 1 ~ oc o . x
Individual 1
uct 1~
s•:i
r ~
13
- f~
- ~
f...,, ~
~
.
i
,
~
~
- ~ ~
.
f
#
4
- . . .S: 3v: ~r. ~ X~
~3~
rpppp
~1.N~ .
-
tY.+
D ~ • Inv o
\
:6
~ - ing
. gatians and Educatio
1.+
jc•
• 11 b Responses to D: •
• e 1'1' o•
.
r:, 1r^
\
~
r '
EFinyTcmn
Hundm6
i ipm RL-i u •A ' O• O0
iT±
ei
" 1 1 1 Heavily I I
o 1 1 R ♦ o
~i
_ NtLudgions
Gas Dignitary P ♦ ' o 11 o
Reg~onail 1 I • 'y
+ya
15
~
.r~ . ~ ~
i
r~ • ~ +
+ +
•.I:~/
1#?~.
E
~
~ :xh
F tr~:~;I
~ a
I 4 i ~
I
F '
'4.
~
;
16
C ~ ' • .
♦ ' ! ' _ •'~~,.~s- . .
.
1.4 .
~
~ -
! ~ • • • ~ • •
•
COIMITY
fr
` >in .u v
iei
D T~cu
as,
'
ti.
r~
~E.R~jt;~•t~ - 4 _
~ . ~".frt% i
~ . . y,~✓ ° N ~J ~ - ' _
`,~i•
7-7
~
~ om -p. Stail'
lice
1 ~ qiuences 1 sUrting
'Skrul
'agency
o t 1 e o ` o 1 ~ : ~
1 1 1 1' .k 1o'
.t . j..
.t
Trat'iiine
4
pmtston .
~ I
:IfYo'\ 1
1 1
_ ' .4
~ 7•
co ~ ,
P g ~
~ SPOMIty . I, • ,
-d.by thi r •
~
kadio &
o • e -
bf Spor. ~ ~ i
1 r• •
o'n Do n
ommunications h&;
~ i.
;
f a e
~ t
'iAt~•.~ ~
! +y~~
k ~
Cr' .
13-
r~
~r
_ • ~ s ~ ~ '7 F -
i
F i 1 p I
~ r
i
~s I
, 4 i y,
,rr.r
f . -
19
"
Ei' b~'
- ~
d -•r'.wa.,~='~ = ~ -
~ ~ yW~~~~~~e~~~~ ~ ~ - •
003
~ ~ ~ ~If~~~~~ ~ • ~
. tl ~SNw y T,- - ~ , a ~
~=1~~~~~~'P~n~'.~~#=~x'a • - .
• 1 ~
& 9:~~~~
I :k • .
I~rt~a ~Is~~>~~°~i !r
))-=-~~rt_ :~1_
_ --Z ~ •
~ a a'j' ~:T F Q ~
16 E Eu i~
~ ~ 6~ ~ •
_ H'n. `~7~' ,•~.~',rt~~ i- ' ~~y~` I~'7~~',~ '~'Y- "i~ ~ it,~y
N
O
a ~ ~ a ~ ~
w
,Roty a~,
~i~7~r`~p' i + . ' , ~
8 • ~ , a`rr8-_:C"a. ggi~ ~
~ y'~ ~jg ~ ~a • ~ ~ - 5 ?--'k-t-e~ ~ r e1'2 W, 3J:1%F55'€9 •
b tgi
! , e: ■ . ~ 1 ~ i~;r~h~pi~ '8'~I~~ 1klry~ ~ ~
aq
TM~M.~.~~ti~~e~ iX~-,,~.."~, ;,•.::ci- ii ='i~stz"~_s.1b4~h1a5~k~ gg ~tiS°~
~ I ~~i 'SM~ -T~s . ' :;9,C: •it ~ I 1 C [ ~S
N
N
N
Q..{y' , - P '~:1ft :~1.. ~ • Y _ ~,~r • -~~*.r~ :r ~~b~~S4,E6~f~S -
.
t➢~.j's1,4]BaR'6C~~K' ~ V~r~
~ a~5z~eo._-i:;Y•o
~ ~ • ~ o, 3 ~
• r• i I
d ~~^e?.~.~~~zea~n f • r,~$~ i
I Yr
C
o ~ : rS~ 6~~:556,i~~~•: ~ ~ }r "t
.
~ ~ t~d ~ ~ • ' ' ~
a C
~
e~~
_ f
- - ~ U
_ - _ ~ y, C ~ p q• q
sr. 7Y ~tR:d~C~`~cJ~s
1~ ~ ~`w~'=sEB~J~'a:'.'4 ~ I ~ cr, • •
•
_ - ~ • r! di~a~Yna13~~;°.+~ ~tt
i
- - - • N7 ~ sgue~aS4~e3:~,
N
W
I
22 111 ' ^ D- -
%dCa=lyWtaUxs SoUlln ~tNa YwMn
' aoaare sooke. co~ v,iiqag vaaey a.y
=Rte 6 fdeleam S9b 25,ffi1 4,52N 37i ~
2X0 4rn.k" BooUng 98°6 7,Ba2 I.5q 54%
m Folmy 3,-ol&v ~ Tig 441 SS'1i
,
Al0 7JD1 77~ UU7Q82D71
TWI ~ t6~1 Fi:ft:i~M~f 4x~in
~ ;dsACh7s fA; ~G QI oN 'a*rO4 cMs 13) Ip 173 ta^9
isSdCdtt~UAPt IE 317 l~
iP,~ryarf~MU - - Sl~ . -5S'i - (d~ - SG1
. r
c.3
[~~i~3•*~r~ 7
3tati~sfical ~ • o
\
. • • ► e 46 ~
S1 %
Disptch
1I
/ ' O' D
w
~
24
I
~ s1
•'y~.-.L"-z.,~i
AN ` .
n ~
r , r.
P-r ~
~
o e - e., -
• e D • a~e'f.
280 Total Employees
Y;
,
ROqjional Employees
sEtnul" '00t
7 ~snena s s~a~ + sncr.~
1 S4lIAqioym
- -e aa
~
- s - naA --i tarucw._.._~.-
1.5 amF ' ~.n% d2Ouj.-6o-
3 eimo crni _a t&uu.a - ~f,
~RerEa Co MeN Gru4 -t LatlGm,- _ - _ ..y .
i DTFroitOaaUGIMOSenalt~ 1 AYS3y
i7.5 NumO.i W WqbnN FieoOprr.
~~.il~ ot iee.l eplal•w)
M1~ .
{
25
~
i
/
Suc oan 6?At~if~e~~{on EmoMV«r+ YY'~~`i,O.
: ium
I] fm~Y { Mleoyr,~
a ra!nW.St^'U•w
- i r,►.vr
t~ W.acn
2 )~n~Ap~ I VrdcxL~1--
l ieµcb (
~ ~Or~~.}tooa'! ! Ckrc~l
i OeCedlRbfbV~SYWM 1 la+~srr~ "
S ~~1~'i:N 1 lnl~rva
1 Seqa~1
l UelkcT •
1 lk9af~ r~
1 C~`~'[M
I Ct+tr
S Q YG~ar . . _ Sf,WIrM •
N Mmb~~ e~ 7u{yan~G~ln. Lrpq~~•
~
6a5c LavM Opcratlons (AuthorizeCl Emvloyc¢s
empa. u,n ~m.eer~nry.
(w :n,nd w r.oa1s
7 .J K-Y Imrlll IfF lkvrb__ ~J C!¢~~b6_
] N.A.K0. 7C~VC{T.
_li -;2CM:ft _
It $~vpur~l
13 R~t~t61X16. . .UZ4V.CL1p
I7 'Pr.pA~ h.{tlpi11~6 ~4L''GVf"+p `
I t! ~ksg h+W ~y4tm J' b1b!U1A . ~ ~ .
0enO,ka
e e+vC xa
- ~c=,,.w ' , . 'eun- t rov~m ol, „t '
P trifs W .'>~s!f~1M _ t CSCi. - - :1 " t ~
,i U.tM.sb
eu.5 fnmu.r E~Wn~..: ri~ w'..~ Oaoeo:v- •'~r
'Ise.~sfie~~a.~enyq~nD '
G
Ootional Employees
2 ~x~91~1_ . _ _ 2 Ccputks
5 ~OAF~ 43In VaG)yj_ 5 P~pn~
5 '3.R,0.19inVn1bil SDewGCe -
2 Cmmvtyiaa. 1 Lktemnt
75 TrMF.:IFA t LiVe~A ' '
Z °crpcarrs`____
39 "bor of Optlaul 9rtplpps• _ , 7
(t).% ot Toc•t pplo~'arl ~:4
t 1
f `
26
-qR,
_ ..yo.
~ ~ ~ .~-s~s-~r: -~t•
` .
~n~cocc.c.r wMO.r ua~s
. ~
~o~.~ic>7. 1m~..ul ~ .~o.ru ,
♦
I~ . T
- • • • ' d City Of Sp Q ane
- • 1
_ • _
a'
.~G
S
i~
2/
l
►~N ~lvllt~YU~~t~a ~ J~
a
~:=v.-...._.. :
•_.,r..... 4i~:~.
~r~-~IK.'~JNJ l:✓tSA.i..u~tiJ'f~~~rN
~r
'1'~aura Uvb ~n he~! o:~ flry ~Ye
• Cm MrM Nl1lC0.~ m~~ b u~NUr ~n YanC~~o/r
~~iV~~W bOalol Wt~n .w ~V/N ~~K Yt~1~sWwt
'1M„ O~~W+r bn.vVY'w ~be~~ .~+~L ~00. nW'A! tlfyuNO
•Omu.rwrna~ro ~.iu~u+n CC~.n,MOwuw~a0w~~~~.~r CaTU~
~i~~s~... ~~eM+~^•~~ •Mo+~ 4tr ~c~n aG.4Cxn~~cew
~ lo~d~a
~ 1 larid~m rN~C Fan ~.Y~b Am+rttM C~at . Ci~!%L R
nw+n h+n:.rss lYA Se~n PaYtl d roolifT • 31'~Odl1x+
) ItlldmMwAGN~hnsYqilH Y~ttr~T~ri.rGU,s; `
P•'~ mlk►~ ALOn.- , O~ nYR Id.l~
•i
T ~
~ • C g'
scs
0
• :dy kno . ~
11 y ra
OU!
9 An agcncy fillcd with highly trained
p• -d law enforcement professi o ~
~
_ : done^a g' ob and - .ai.
bighly w p- ~ T:T
ti..
i~
28
vo • ~
~0 .
, 7in
sci
~
.
eln
W-d
. ~ d . d .
~
SCSO
be Pla"
thi
Requifes
. • ,
a
~ ' ; ~jt~ F7~ • ~
.~4...
2
~ T 2003 SHERIF_F'S OFFICE EMPLOYEE DISTRIBUTION
c. ~ N r;G. 11
~...i
~ Regionai Employees ~
# Empl. Unit Classifica i n
2 Slieriff & Staff 1 Sheriff
1 Staff Assistant
8 Civil Division 1 Seryeant
4 Deputies
3 Clerical
1 DCA 1 DeUCorp.
1.5 RnTF .25% of 2 Deputies
1 Clcrical
3 F3yrne Grant 3 DeUCorp.
1 Picrcc Co Me1h Grarit 1 DeUCorp.
t DT Front Desk/Crthsc Security 1 Deputy
17.5 Number of Regional Employees
(6.25% of Total Employees)
~ Support & Administration Employees ~
#-E.ropL tJ.t].it Glassitic.a-tio.n
~RA9.r!
13 Forcnsic i 1 Manager
9 Forensic SpECialists
. 3 Clerical
20 Radio 5 Supervisors
15 Operators
a Garagc 1 Manager
3 Technicians
Adniin•
2 Senior Acimin. 1 Undersherifi
1 Inspector
' 6 Admin. Support 5 CleriCal
1 Office of Professional Standards 1 Lietitenant
S TraininglPolygraph 1 Lieutenant
1 Sergeant
1 DeUCorp.
1 Deputy
1 Clerical
1 Public Information Oificer 1 beUCorp.
2 Criine nnalysis 1 Deputy
1 Clerical
5 Clerical Support 5 Clerical
59 Number of SupportlAdmin. Employees
(21% of Total Employees)
erttpl distr Page 1 914102
2003 SHERIFF'S OFFICE EMPLOYEE DISTRIBUTION -
Base Level Operations (Authorized) Employees !
tLEmal.. lJni.t CJ.assi.fic~tion
94 patrol 94 Deputies
3 2 K-9 Track/1 K-9 Bomb 3 DeWuties
2 I'r1.A.R.Ft. 2 DcUCorp.
17 Patrol Supervision 2 Captains
4 Lieutenanis
11 SErgeants
13 Persons Investigations 13 DeUCorp.
12 f'roperty Investiyations 12 DeUCorp.
11.5 Drug Investigations 7 DeUCorp.
4.5 Deputies
2 Dom. Violence Investig. 1 DeUCorp.
1 Deputy
1 Criiiiinal Intelligence Unit 1OeUCorp.
9 Inveslig. Supervisior7 1 CiWt.
2 Lieutenants
6 Sergeants
164.5 Number Employees: Base Level Operations
(58.75% of Total Employccs)
C_J
~ Optional Employees ,
# Emnl. Unj.t (~.I.~~sification
2 K-9 (Drug) 2 DeputiEs
5 [7ARE (3 in Valley) 5 Deputies
5 S_R.O_ (3 in Valley) 5 Deputies
Cornmuriity Svs. 1 l_ieutenant
1 Deputy
25 Traffic Unit 1 Lieutenant
2 Sergeants
22 Deputies
39 Number of Optional Employees
(13.9% of Total Emp7.oyee4)
2~8U . ;•T;OT~AL~EMPL~OI(EES~LL~-~F~S EH RI~~F''S OFFICrE
-
ernpl distr 914l02
CONTRACT POSITION COSTS
QjequAy Deteclive/Core• Sergeant Lieutenant Staplaul
Salaries and Benefits 71,487 82,726 89,755 104,726 105,612
Overtime 1,489 1,725 1,882 0 0
Additional Pay 1,459 1,691 1,845 0 0
Sub-Total: Wages 74,435 86,142 93,481 104,726 105,612
Clothing / Vests 111 111 111 111 111
Ammunition 71 71 71 71 71
Radio M/0 Supplies 119 119 119 119 119
Equiprnent (Gun, Radio, Computer) 169 169 169 169 169
Dafa Processing-CADiRMS 760 760 760 760 760
Telephone/CeIl/Pager 324 324 324 324 324
Training 293 293 293 293 293
Fuel 794 794 794 794 794
Vehicie 2,289 2,289 2,289 2,289 2,289
Sub-Total: Direcl Costs 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930 4,930
Forensic Unit Support 1,373 1,373 1,373 1,373 1,373
Radio Division 5,300 5,306 5,306 5,306 5,306
Garage Unit ~ m 9-15 m m
Sub-Total: Support Units 7,594 7,594 7,594 7,594 7,594
i ~ Department Administration:
SeniorAdministration 1,004 1,004 1,004 1,004 1,004
\BudgeUAccountinglAdmin Support 1,312 1,312 1,312 1,312 1,312
OffiCe of Professionai Standarcls 472 472 472 472 472
Training 8 I'olygraph Unit 1,726 1,726 1,726 1,726 1,726
Public Iniormatinn OKcer 359 359 359 359 359
Crime Analysis Unit 505 505 505 505 505
Clerical Support 939 939 939 939 939
Sub-Total: Dept. Admin. 6,317 6,317 6,317 6,317 6,317
Sheriffs Office Total 93,276 104,983 112,322 123,567 124,453
County Overhead 6,091 6,091 6,091 6,091 6,091
Grand Total 99,367 111,074 118,413 129,658 130,544
' Salary figures are from 2003 Budget
'*COWCAP from Fiscal 2001 = 1,930,937
-minus Bldg. Deprec. -17,775
-minus Equip. Deprec. -365,5$3
-minus PSB Sq. Fooiage _177•018
1,370,561,
position costs Page 2 12/17102
PROPOSED CITY OF SPOKANE.VALLEY:STAFFINGf.-' ' .
wrl°fP'. .
„ AT CURRENT LEVEL.OF'SERVICE~
~ BASE LEVEL OPERATIONS ~
# EmnloySes UnlS Classification Cost
47 Patrol 47 Deputies 4,670,239
1.5 K-9 Tracking/Bomb Dog 1.5 Qeputy 149,050
1 - M.A.R.R. 1 Det/Corp. 111,074
8.5 Patrol Supervision 1 Captain 130,544
2 Lieutenants 259,315
5.5 Sergeants 651,272
6.5 Persons Investigations 6.5 Det/Corp. 721,981
6 Property Investigations 6 Det/Corp. 666,444
6 Drug Investigations 4 Det/Corp. 444,296
2 Deputies 198,734
1 Domestic Violence Invest. .50 Det/Corp. 55,537
.50 Deputy 49,683
0.5 Criminal Intelligence Unit .50 Det/Corp. 55,537
4.5 Investigations Supervision .50 Captain 65,272
1 Lieutenant 129,658
3 Sergeants 355,239
82.5 Proposed Base Level Operations Employees 8,713,878
L.E.S.U. 1.042.739
TOTAL BASE LEVEL 9,756,617
~ OPTIONAL OPERATIONS !
# Em I~oyees UniS Classification C_o_st
1 K-9 (Drug) 1 Depury 99,367
3 DARE 3 Deputies 298,100
3 Schoo! Resource Officers 3 Deputies 298,100
--less revenue' -57.291
1 Community Services .50 Lieutenant 64,829
.SO Deputy 49,683
12.5 Traffic Unit .50 Lieutenant 64,829
1 Sergeant 118,413
11 Qeputies 1,093,035
--less revenue2 -100,000
20:5 Proposed Optional Level of Operations Empl. 1,929,066
~,~•"Kt-:103%t;"<,CURRENT LEVEL OF',SERVICE,, ~ ;;'`','!;-"z' ~ ` 11,685,6821
valley proposed staff Page 4 12113l02
'Personnel Costs are based on 2003 salary figures
' Costs inClude 2003 COLA cosfs for all Unions and Associalions
'Number of employees for Patrol functions were figured using 50°;0 of Workload
'Number o( employecs for Investigative functions were figurecf by using 50% of Caseload
'Costs will increase each year based on COLA's, M/O Increase or Decrease, and C2pital
Expenditures / Imurovements as approvad by the Board of County Commissioners
Footnotes
1 Half of revenue received from a Juvenile Accountability Grant = $27,291; plus
revenue from Central Valley School District for two SRD's =$15,000 each
2 Walf of revenue received from a"Cops Universal" grant for eight Traffic oKcers;
grant provides $25,000lofficer/year; grant expires 12131103
i ~
~
.
~
valley proposed staFf Page 4 12l17/02
LA1N ENFORCENfEh1T Sl7PPORT UNITS
Adjusted 2003 MIO 1,1 56,845 x 5o%_ 578,423
Equipmen#f7echnology for 2003 176,890 x 5o% = 88.345
Properky Room/Records 743,811 x 50% = 371,906
Portion of Sheriff Salary 4,066 4,066
-:7.OTAL,U`:; ;41~~`,.' . : . '-:V;04 7
~
I
~
~
I~s~ Page 3 12113102