Loading...
2004, 04-13 Regular Meeting MinutesMINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Tuesday, April 13, 2004 Mayor DeVleming called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the meeting. Attendance: Councilmembers: Michael DeVleming, Mayor Diana Wilhite, Deputy Mayor Dick Denenny, Councilmember Mike Flanigan, Councilmember Richard Munson, Councilmember Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Steve Taylor, Councilmember Staff: Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Stanley Schwartz, City Attorney Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Ken Thompson, Finance Director Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director Marina Sukup, Community Development Director Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Tom Scholtens, Building Official Kevin Snyder, Current Planning Manager Sue Pearson, Deputy City Clerk Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor DeVleming led the Pledge of Allegiance. INVOCATION: Pastor Barry Foster, Valleypoint at Pines gave the invocation. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; all Councilmembers were present. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Councilmember Denenny and seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilhite to approve the agenda. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Councilmember Schimmels reported that he attended the Spokane Regional Transportation Committee meeting last week, that the Highway Administrator from Olympia attended and commended the works of the local committee; Councilmember Schimmels also reported that he attended the Solid Waste meeting along with representatives from Spokane County, Spokane City, and numerous cities and towns. Councilmember Taylor said that he attended the Tourism Promotion Area Steering Committee's organizational meeting last week, and that he anticipates some of what was discussed will be contained in tonight's Convention Visitor's Bureau report. Councilmember Munson explained that he attended the Central Valley School Board District meeting, where the future of the schools was discussed and that there are no plans or recommendations for any schools to close, although some boundaries might change to ensure schools are filled. Deputy Mayor Wilhite: announced she and Mayor DeVleming attended the reception for a prospective business client the EDC has been working with, and that client could potentially move into our region; she also attended the CVB regional business meeting. Council Minutes 04 -13 -04 Page 1 of 5 Date Approved by Council: 04 -27 -04 MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor DeVleming reported that the next "Conversation with the Community" is scheduled for tomorrow at 3:00 p.m. at the Senior Center; that one week from tonight the City's first "State of the City" address will be given at 11:30 a.m. at Decades; and that next Tuesday night there be no council meeting but there will be an open house held 6:00 p.m. at the Central Valley School District Board Boom to discuss wastewater issues. Deputy Mayor Wilhite read the "Small Business Month" Proclamation; and Mayor DeVleming read the "National Youth Service Day" proclamation, after which AmeriCorps member Andrew Green and Chase Youth Commissioner Mary Ann Almeida spoke about projects they are involved with all as part of the recognition of National Youth Service Day. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor DeVleming invited public comment for issues not on the agenda; none were offered. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2004 Budget Amendment — Ken Thompson Mayor DeVleming opened the public hearing at 6:16 p.m. and asked Finance Director Thompson for commentary on the proposal. Director Thompson briefly went over the accompanying spreadsheet. Mayor DeVleming invited public testimony; none was offered. Mayor DeVleming closed the public hearing at 6:20 p.m. 2. SIGNAGE ISSUES — Marina Sukup Community Development Director Sukup explained that the City Council previously adopted Chapter 14.804 of the Zoning Code of Spokane County as interim signage regulations; and at the April 6 Council meeting, Council approved a phased approach to full enforcement of these sign regulations, with priority given to prohibited and abandoned signs, and signs which represent safety issues and encroach on the public right -of -way. She explained that staff was also directed to form an ad hoc committee to review these regulations; that staff advertised for committee members and those interested have completed the application form; and that she anticipates names to be forwarded in May for appointment consideration. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment. Duane Halliday, 1015 E. Cataldo: said on behalf of Lamar Outdoor Advertising, he looks forward to this process. Mike Schuler, 738 N Stone: said he is part owner of Crown Sign Service, which is an electrical sign contracting company, that he favors enforcement of the sign codes and added that we should also enforce RCW 18.27 which states that licensed contractors must install signs, and that the City Hall sign was installed by a non - licensed contractor, Purrfect Logo. Mayor DeVleming invited further public comment; none was offered. 3. CONSENT AGENDA. After City Clerk Bainbridge read the Consent Agenda, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to approve the Consent Agenda. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS 4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 04 -014 Amending Ordinance 40 & 41 — Tom Scholtens After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Munson and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to approve Ordinance 04 -014. Building Official Scholtens explained that there have been no changes since the first reading, that staff received notification from CTED that they do not need to review these codes, and we are therefore ready to move forward. Mayor Council Minutes 04 -13 -04 Page 2 of 5 Date Approved by Council: 04 -27 -04 DeVleming invited public comment; none was offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 5. First Reading Ordinance 04 -015 Proposed 2004 Budget Amendment — Ken Thompson After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to advance Ordinance 04 -015 to a second reading. Director Thompson explained that this is the beginning of the process to adopt the amendment, and that he anticipates this moving forward for a second reading with no changes. Deputy City Manager Regor added that the finance committee is also schedule to meet tomorrow to discuss the budget amendment. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; none was offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 6. Proposed Resolution 04 -009 Setting Public Hearing Date for Street Vacation 0204 — Kevin Snyder After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Councilmember Munson and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to approve resolution 04 -009. Current Planning Manager Snyder explained that this resolution is in response to a request for a street vacation, and that statute requires Council set a public hearing date for the matter to be heard by the Planning Commission. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; none was offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 7. Proposed Resolution 04 -010 Establishing Selected Locations for Alcohol Consumption on Park Property — Mike Jackson After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilhite to approve Resolution 04 -010. Parks and Recreation Director Jackson explained that Ordinance 03 -065 states that Council shall set by Resolution those areas in City -owned parks in which the City will allow the consumption of alcohol; and that following Council discussion of March 16, 2004, those areas are included in the draft resolution. Director Jackson stated he would have discretion on approval, and if such request were denied, the requestor would always have the ability to seek council review. Director Jackson stated that the reservation procedure would be fairly lengthy, and that insurance and a banquet permit would be required. Discussion turned to concern of including Mirabeau Meadows, of permitting alcohol in any parks, security issues, under -age drinking, and the desire to keep the parks' atmosphere a family atmosphere. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment. Bill Gothmann: said if Council's purpose is to be family friend, the best way is not to permit drinking in the parks; that indoors would be acceptable but not outside. Tony Lazanis: stated concerns about keeping those people not involved in the event, from mingling with event participants and feels indoors would be acceptable, but not outside. Dick Behm, 3626 S Ridgeview: mentioned his concerns about liability issues, and of overall problems of serving alcohol in the parks. After further Council deliberation and discussion, it was moved by Councilmember Taylor and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to amend the motion to strike Section 1B from the resolution. Mayor DeVleming invited further public comment. Bob Blum, 1272 E. 50 said he agrees with Councilmember Taylor; that CenterPlace would be reasonable but not to extend the permitted areas to other areas. Council Minutes 04 -13 -04 Page 3 of 5 Date Approved by Council: 04 -27 -04 Vote by acclamation on amending the motion: In Favor: Councilmembers Schimmels, Munson, Taylor, and Denenny. Opposed: Mayor DeVleming, Deputy Mayor Wilhite and Councilmember Flanigan. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Original motion amended. Vote by acclamation on the amended motion; i.e., approval of resolution striking Section 1 Paragraph B. In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 8. Proposed Resolution 04 -011 Amending Fee Resolution — Mike Jackson After City Clerk Bainbridge read the resolution title, it was moved by Councilmember Munson and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to approve Resolution 04 -011. Parks and Recreation Director Jackson explained that this change encompasses the $10.00 alcohol permit fee. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; none was offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 9. Motion Consideration: Approval of Economic Analysis Scope — Marina Sukup It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Munson to approve the scope of work for the economic analysis for the Sprague /Appleway Couplet. Community Development Director Sukup explained that at the April 6 meeting, staff provided an update on comments received regarding the draft scope; that Dr. Jones of Eastern Washington University contacted her and expressed interest in the proposal, but said he does not have a planner or the approval yet from the business school; and that she suggests moving forward to issue an RFP next week if there is no final word from Dr. Jones by the end of the week. Director Sukup stated she would like to be able to report back to Council mid -May. In reference to council question concerning the legal requirements of advertising or seeking an RFP and /or conducting an EIS (environmental impact statement), City Attorney Schwartz explained there are three categories of products in public bidding: (1) public works, which does not apply here, (2) purchase of personal property such as fixtures, furniture, equipment, etc, which does not apply here, and (3) a services contract which is the instant case; and with respect to a services contract, bids are typically in three categories: looking for architectural or engineering services — which is not the case here; and parking management and janitorial services — which are also not included; therefore, Mr. Schwartz said he feels there is no legal requirement to bid the services contract. However, Attorney Schwartz explained that many councils do elect to go through a public bidding process in order to determine what is on the market and perhaps have a menu from which to choose. Councilmember Schimmels asked about the other universities, and Director Sukup said she received notice that Whitworth College is not in a position to assist in this proposal. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment. Frank Tombari, 1011 W. 28 Avenue: said he is employed by Farmers and Merchants Bank, and applauds the desire to move ahead with the economic analysis; but feels that the scope should be more broad than identified; also feels timing issue is driving the matter; wants to make sure scope is not limited. Ed Willett, 7216 E. 10 Avenue: said he doesn't understand why engineering firms couldn't do that project and feels we could get an answer quickly. Philip Rudy, 10720 E. Fruithill: said he sent a letter to council and planning commission and would like that included in this testimony [city clerk has obtained a copy of that correspondence and will include it with these original minutes]; said that the quality of traffic flow and the time of day of the traffic are very important issues as they affect the retail establishments. Dick Behm, 3626 S Ridgeview: said he sent a four -page letter to council, which letter stated that choosing alternatives is bad policy, that we don't have a traffic study or economic analysis completed; said that Eastern has never done an economic analysis and if they are reluctant to do one we should have one done Council Minutes 04 -13 -04 Page 4 of 5 Date Approved by Council: 04 -27 -04 professionally; urged council to do it right, hire professionals, publish the RFP and get it done and work it into the city center plan and comp plan and cautioned council not to be in a rush to make a decision. Tony Lazanis: said the corridor is crucial to the valley business and people and feels it should be extended out to Pines as there is money available; wants more cross - overs; feels the issue needs lots of planning. Mayor DeVleming invited further public comment; none was offered. Councilmember Taylor said he feels the Couplet has not significantly hurt businesses and that many other factors are being overlooked; but that it is his hope that the economic study will aid in this issue. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Mayor DeVleming called for a recess at 7:52 p.m.; and reconvened the meeting at 8:01 p.m. 10. Motion Consideration: Authorization for .15 FTE Engineer at Grade 17 — Nina Regor It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Schimmels to approve authorization for a .15 FTE engineer at Grade 17. Deputy City Manager Regor explained that this position represents approximately 26 hours a month of assistance for engineering; that the cost is estimated at $10,000, which would be offset by lowering that amount with the County engineering agreement; that the position would be a permanent part-time employee and that the FTE amount could change as needs dictate. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 11. Motion Consideration: Sponsor of Small Business Association Celebration — Deputy Mayor Wilhite It was moved by Deputy Mayor Wilhite and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to endorse the Small Business Association 's celebration and authorize the use of the City of Spokane Valley's logo. Deputy Mayor Wilhite gave a brief explanation of this year's celebration and some of the events scheduled. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 12. Spokane Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau Report — John Brewer Mr. Brewer showed a video depicting some highlights of the Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau; and then discussed the highlights of the annual report and project summary. He added that this year's annual tourism awards are scheduled for May 13 at the Doubletree City Center, and that all regional Mayors will be invited to participate. 13. Essential Public Facilities lnterlocal Agreement — Cary Driskell/Marina Sukup Community Development Sukup showed the PowerPoint presentation [Councilmember Schimmels left the room at approximately 8:37 p.m., and returned at 8:40 p.m.] and explained the requirement for siting essential public facilities, such as a wastewater treatment facility. Deputy City Attorney Driskell explained that this issue was discussed last year and that perhaps now is the time to address this issue. It was council consensus to move forward and place this interlocal on a future council agenda. There being no further business, it was moved by Councilmember Flanigan, seconded by Councilmember Munson, and unanimously agreed upon to adjourn. The meeting adjourned 8:42 p.m. 7 - i.,k_ if >4 Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Minutes 04 -13 -04 Date Approved by Council: 04 -27 -04 Michael DeVleming, Mayor Page 5 of 5 Original Message From: Philip L. Rudy, DOS [mailto:drrudy @sbcglobal.net] Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 9:19 PM To: Marina Sukup Subject: Thoughts on Economic Analysis of Applcway /Sprague Couplet Marina Sukup Here are some of my thoughts on the question of the Applcway /Sprague Couplet: Many factors come into play when a study is done about how the economy will react to decisions determining design of roads. First, some observations: Sprague Avenue has served the Spokane Valley for many years. It has been a major travel area. One -way couplets move a lot of traffic efficiently. An example is Argonne- Mullan from the T -90 to Applcway. it is interesting to note that very little retail has prospered in that corridor. Sprague Avenue, from Havana to Faucher, which is four lanes and two -way, provides access to Costco, Horne Depot and Lowes which are major retail attractions. Sullivan Road is a six lane two -way arterial. it moves a lot of traffic. It supports a lot of retail. This arterial produces a healthy tax base. The sources of revenue include sales taxes and property taxes. Expansion of the 1 -90 from Argonne to Sullivan will be completed near the end of 2005. A study should include some history of changes to Sprague Avenue from Havana to beyond Sullivan. In my opinion sections of Sprague need to be studied to understand what made each section prosperous or what contributed to its decline. The history of economic results of the effect of changes of two -way to one -way flow of traffic on Sprague Avenue between rancher and University needs to be compiled. Also thc effect of management of University City over the past two decades needs to be addressed as to the effect it had on the economic climate of that section of Sprague Avenue. The City of Spokane Valley needs to decide how moving a lot of traffic efficiently through its central core is in the best interests of maintaining that portion of its tax base. If T were to wave my magic wand (and it worked its magic) 1 would study the economic impacts of Sprague Avenue two -way from Havana to Sullivan and beyond. I would study the impacts of making Appleway two -way from Havana to Sullivan. 1 would study the impacts of limiting access on Appleway to the existing cross streets with the idea that Appleway would be an arterial with minimal stops so as to accommodate large amounts of traffic that want to make good time on regional commuting trips. I would further limit development on the Southside of Appleway with highest and bcst use limited to multi- family. Excluding uses higher than multi - family on thc south side of Appleway is important for several reasons. It preserves commercial and retail for Sprague Avenue and the north side of Appleway. Giving windfall commercial value to land south of Appleway reduces the value of commercial property on Sprague Avenue. This is important for the economic health of the city of Spokane Valley. If availability of developable commercial and retail land is expanded beyond a reasonable amount, existing marginal commercial and retail properties will not be improved to be competitive or may be left empty. Empty commercial and retail facilities foster crime. Those properties will fall in value. Lower property values produce lower real estate taxes and the resultant income to the city will be reduced. The City of Spokane Valley needs to decide how moving a lot of traffic efficiently through its central core is in the best interests of maintaining that portion of its tax base. The City Council can make decisions on road design. This includes, but is not limited to determining 2, 4, or 6 lanes and two -way or one -way. The resultant traffic flow will determine how the business community will invest or not invest in their specific properties. Some owners will choose to improve their real estate while others will choose to wait and see. A professional company that has expertise with overall urban planning should be hired to gather facts, consult on the best way to meet goals and produce a report outlining a recommended plan of action. While it is important to focus on Sprague Avenue, Havana to Sullivan and beyond, one needs to remember it is only a part of the overall city. 1t needs to be able to handle its traffic and carry its fair share of the load of providing jobs and providing a tax base (sales and property taxes) for the citizens and government of the Spokane Valley. Philip L. Rudy, DDS NAME PRESENT /ABSENT COMMENTS Mayor Michael DeVleming- Position No. 3 t Deputy Mayor Diana Wilhite- Position No. a Councilmember Dick Denenny - Position No. 7 Councilmember Mike Flanigan- Position No. 6 t / Councilmember Rich Munson - Position No. 5 Councilmember Gary Schimmels- Position No. 4 j Councilmember Steve Taylor- Position No. 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COUNCIL MEETING DATE COUNCIL ROLL CALL --o NAME PLEASE PRINT ADDRESS TELEPHONE u1 o'/ 05 E (11.81 73 s Ai sCo4 e 77'2o z 5 7 —DAVE M L��L_C v_ 1e r1 Spokane -�, jUalley �,�� PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN -IN SHEET TOPIC: SIGNAGE SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 13, 2004 All persons wishing to speak at a PUBLIC COMMENT must sign in with your name and address for the record. There may be a time limit for your comments. A copy of any written comments relating to the public hearing subject must be a rovided to the City Clerk. 2. PROJECT SUMMARY The Spokane Regional CVB is pleased to present this innovative, goal oriented plan that grows the partnership between the CVB and Spokane Valley. This application will show our emphasis on the Valley while continuing to provide a picture of our magnificent regional destination to the traveler. Our 2004 Marketing Plan and Budget as well as our Long Range Plan through 2008 provide greater emphasis on Spokane Valley through the following programs: • Spokane County Fair and Expo Center Dedicated sales position, specific sales missions and familiarization tours, advertising and direct mail • Mirabeau Point Fair & Expo sales position will begin to focus on long term sales of this new facility • Express Meetings Fair & Expo sales position will also spend time generating leads for Valley hotels • Branding the Region and the Valley In 2003 regional partners collaborated to develop a brand to be used by economic development partners: "Near Nature. Near Perfect" 2004 will be the inaugural year for implementation in an extensive year -round campaign. • Valley Visitor Information Center Two part -time employees will staff the Valley VIC full time as well as focusing on web splash page development and hospitality training. • Film Production Further the Valley's image as a location for major motion pictures and commercial shoots • Calgary Sales Mission Once again the CVB will be targeting this rising lucrative travel market In 2003 we took 37 people to Calgary for this mission. • Destination Marketing Material As the portal to regional travel information, we will continue to develop and distribute creative print pieces such as the visitor guide, niche market brochures, maps, and event calendars • Professional Sales Team A professional sales and marketing team will focus efforts on group leisure sales (domestic and international), individual leisure marketing, and meetings, conventions and event sales. Support from Spokane Valley will ensure us the ability to leverage $2.2 million in marketing funds to promote our diverse destination for overall economic growth. 2 Project Name General Fund: Reserve for Revenue Adjustments $ - $ S $ (1,007,161) Reserve for Service Level Stabilization (100,000) Contingency Reserve (195,000) Student Advisory Council 500 Total General Fund $(1,301.661.00) Hotel/Motel Fund: SCVB SRSC SV Soccer SV YMCA Spokane County Fair Valley Fest SV Heritage Museum Total Hotel /Motel Fund Sewer Fund: Hillview Acres Sewer Paveback PinecroftiMansfield Sewer Paveback Harrington Sewer Paveback Total Sower Fund CD Block Grant Fund Weatherwood /Owens (STEP) $ $ Carnahan (STEP) Total CD Block Grant Fund Capital Grants Fund Barker Road Reconstruction 24th Avenue Project Total Capital Grants Fund Barker Road Bridge Recon. Fund Barker Road Bridge Reconstruction $ $ ER &R Fund Capital Outlay - Code Enf. Vehicle $ Total ER&R Fund City of Spokane Valloy Exhibit A 2003 2003 2003 Actual Remaining Appropriation Expenditures Budget $ 480,000.00 $ 423,729.60 $ 56,270.40 200,000.00 59,666.28 140,333.72 279,000.00 236,997.00 42.003.00 959,000.00 720.392.88 238,607.12 S $ $ 2004 Budget Funding Amendment Source 1 2 El Sales Tax Revenues $ 83,700.00 S 16,168.79 $ 67,531.21 S 67,531.00 52,200.00 - 52,200.00 52,200.00 24,800.00 5,422.36 19,377.64 19,378.00 18,000.00 - 18,000.00 18,000.00 17,500.00 - 17,500.00 17,500.00 2.800.00 2,800.00 - 1,000.00 1,000.00 200,000.00 25,391.15 174,608.85 174,609.00 © Fund Balance 238,607.12 ['Sewer Fund Balance $ 394,000.00 Street Bond and Block Grant Proceeds 110,000.00 Street Bond and Block Grant Proceeds 504,000.00 S $ $ 639,000.00 TIB Grant & Transfers from Arterial Street Fund 198,000.00 TIB Grant & Transfers from Arterial Street Fund 837.000.00 $ $ 702,000.00 © BRAC Grant Proceeds S $ 15,000.00 (] Interfund Transfer - General Fund (Already Budgeted) Budgeted originally in wrong fund