2004, 09-28 Regular Meeting MinutesMayor DeVleming called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., and welcomed everyone to the 52nd meeting.
Attendance:
Councilmembers:
Michael DeVleming, Mayor
Diana Wilhite, Deputy Mayor
Dick Denenny, Councilmember
Mike Flanigan, Councilmember
Steve Taylor, Councilmember
Gary Schimmels, Councilmember
Absent:
Richard Munson, Councilmember, excused
MINUTES
City of Spokane Valley
City Council Regular Meeting
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Staff:
Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager
Stanley Schwartz, City Attorney
Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
Marina Sukup, Community Development Director
Mike Jackson, Parks & Recreation Director
Steve Worley, Senior Engineer
Greg McCormick, Long Range Planning Manager
Cal Walker, Police Chief
Scott Kuhta, Long Range Planner
Bing (Greg) Bingaman, IT Specialist
Sue Pearson, Deputy City Clerk
Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Mayor DeVleming led the Pledge of Allegiance.
INVOCATION: Pastor David Johnson of the Valley United Methodist Church gave the invocation.
ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called roll; Councilmember Munson excused; all remaining
Councilmembers present.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA Mayor DeVleming explained that he would like to add agenda item 6a,
change order addendum for CenterPlace, and item 6b appointment to Student Advisory Council. It was
moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to approve the amended agenda.
Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
COMMITTEE, BOARD, LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS:
Councilmember Flanigan: reported that last Thursday he attended the Public Health District Board
meeting where the topic of fluoride was discussed; they also gave a monthly update on the West Nile
Virus and stated that according to the CDC (Center for Disease Control), Washington State is the only
state which has not experienced any human infections. Councilmember Flanigan also reported that
Valleyfest was well attended with an estimated 28,000 to 30,000 people; and that STA's shuttle service
was exemplary.
Deputy Mayor Wilhite: said that she also attended Valleyfest, and attended the dedication at Mirabeau and
an autumn red maple tree was planted in commemoration; and that she attended the CVB meeting in
Councilmember Denenny's absence.
Councilmember Denenny: mentioned that STA had their first evening meeting, and that the meetings are
televised from the Spokane City Council Chambers beginning at 5:30 p.m.; they discussed light rail
funding, reiterated the intent to use the authorized three - tenths of one - percent sales tax for the authorized
system, that they granted authority to continue study to pursue all rapid transit alternatives, from
rubberized bus rapid transit to the full blown light rail system, but that nothing would happen without
another vote of the people.
Council Meeting Minutes of 9 -28 -04 Page 1 of 6
Approved: 10 -12 -04
MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor DeVleming mentioned that the Student Advisory Council held its
orientation meeting and that their first official meeting will be October 7, 2004.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
John Snediker, 18316 E Broadway Avenue: spoke of his concern regarding the library, and reiterated his
request for a year extension of the current agreement while all options are examined; asked that we apply
sound business principals to this proposal, and do what makes the most sense; distributed three kinds of
candy and said that concerning the proposal, we are looking at 1.5 books per person when 85,000 is
divided, which could represent the smaller kitkat candy; if you look at what the library has now 408,000
that could be perceived as the larger candy; and looking at how that goes together with the reciprocal
agreement with the downtown library that's another 577,000, which works out to 11 total for the current
arrangement we have, and if we pull out and reduce down, there won't be the right number to have the
reciprocal agreement with the downtown library; and that needs to be examined, and he feels there is not
enough time to thoroughly examine all those options between now and January 1.
1. CONSENT AGENDA Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. A
Councilmember may remove an item from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.
a. Approval of Regular Council Meeting Minutes of September 14, 2004
b. Approval of Study Session Minutes of September 21, 2004
c. Approval of Voucher List of 9 -10 -04 and 9 -16 -04 in the total amount of $409,635.48 for
voucher numbers: 5524 through 5553; and 5561 through 5591.
It was moved by Mayor DeVleming, and seconded by Councilmember Denenny, to waive the reading and
approve the consent agenda as written. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None.
Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 04 -038, Clear View Triangles — Marina Sukup
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Denenny and
seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to approve Ordinance 04 -038. Community Development Director
Sukup gave a brief overview, and explained that there have been no changes since the first reading.
Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor:
Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
3. Second Reading Proposed Vacation Ordinance 04 -039, STV -04 -04 - Marina Sukup
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by
Councilmember Flanigan to approve Ordinance 04 -039. Community Development Director Sukup
explained that staff and the planning commission recommend approval subject to the conditions stated in
the ordinance, including a request from Avista to provide for a 10' wide strip over and along the north ten
feet of that portion of the alley where the vacation is requested. Mayor DeVleming asked if the property
owner is willing to keep an open mind on the cut - through of the streets; Director Sukup said it is her
understanding that has not been discussed with the property owner but could be pursued and stated that
the property owner is here. Mayor DeVleming asked the property owner to speak to this issue. Bob Irish,
124 N 19 said he represents the property owner; that this alley doesn't go anywhere, if they'd consider
opening up Sipple which is used as a public thoroughfare now, it would completely disrupt their business
operation. It was moved by Mayor DeVleming to table this issue until staff has an opportunity to discuss
this issue with the property owner. No second was offered and the motion was not considered. After
further council discussion, it was determined that Sipple would not be an issue. Mayor DeVleming invited
public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation to approve Ordinance 04 -039: In
Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
Council Meeting Minutes of 9 -28 -04 Page 2 of 6
Approved: 10 -12 -04
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 04 -040, Public Record Indexes — Chris Bainbridge
After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Councilmember Flanigan, and
seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilhite to suspend the rules and approve ordinance 04 -040. City Clerk
Bainbridge gave a brief overview of the ordinance as explained in the accompanying Request for Council
Action form. Mayor DeVleming invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by
Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
5. Motion Consideration: Six -Year Stormwater Utility Financial Plan - Neil Kersten
It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Schimmels to approve the six -year
stormwater financial plan. Public Works Director Kersten explained that the proposed six -year plan was
previously discussed August 24, September 7 and September 21, and that the plan includes funding for
two staff, costs associated with stormwater- related planning, cleaning, repair and maintenance, but does
not include funding for major capital projects; and that the plan calls for a fee increase from the annual
$10 per equivalent residential unit (ERU) to an annual $24 ERU. After Director Kersten gave his
PowerPoint presentation, Mayor DeVleming invited public comment.
Dick Behm, 3626 S Ridgeview Rd: said he takes exception to a staff member; said this is for the birds; he
said he spent six and one -half years on a Spokane County Water Quality Advisory Board and he knows
more about the stormwater system in Spokane County then almost anyone in the valley would; that
Glenrose is about a $12 million dollar project, Five Mile is almost that much; that those projects were
being funded by the stormwater tax from the valley; and when the valley incorporated that took it away;
the last year he was on the Water Quality Advisory Board, they were discussing fee schedules and that the
stormwater fee would have to increase to subsidize Glenrose and the rest and there was quite a bit of talk
about that as the valley was subsidizing the rest of the county on stormwater fees; he said it is quite
inappropriate to put street cleaning and sweeping into a stormwater fee basis and make people pay for it
twice, that that is not a stormwater issue and should not be charged against the stormwater fee; that
Spokane County also charged ERUs as on all impervious surfaces within the stormwater area and that
included county roads; they charged Spokane County Road's Department ERU charges for the county
roads just like it charged any commercial property, and then the County roads department charged the
Spokane County Stormwater Utility department the cost to maintain drywells and swales; and that there's
more to this then presented tonight and he's disappointed in the presentation; and he asks Council to take
this issue to members of the public and get more discussion before going ahead with this.
Tony Lazanis: said he is surprised Council never asked any more questions and will implement the $24.50
even though the valley has no stormwater problems, and most businesses have to take care of their own
drainage, and that he is surprised that Councilmember Denenny was with the county's stormwater system
for many years and he never asked any questions; and that Council will change the amount to $24.50 and
never ask any questions; that no one takes care of the swales; that Council should be careful with what it
does; and he doesn't want Council to drive the city into the ground.
Councilmember Denenny stated that he doesn't wait until the last minute at the dais to ask questions, and
because he doesn't ask questions up here doesn't mean this has not been thoroughly discussed, and this is
not the time to question staff when this has already been presented three or four times; that the majority of
this funding is for street cleaning, that he believes street cleaning should be part of the stormwater as there
is no question stormwater problems along drywells are created by debris left on the street and winter
sanding, etc and that it is appropriate to use stormwater funding. Councilmember Taylor said he agrees
with Councilmember Denenny and that drywell maintenance and stormwater facility maintenance is
required because of the debris and winter cleaning. Vote on motion to approve the six -year stormwater
financial plan: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
Council Meeting Minutes of 9 -28 -04 Page 3 of 6
Approved: 10 -12 -04
6. Mayoral Appointment: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee — Mayor DeVleming
It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Deputy Mayor Wilhite to appoint Jeff Fiman to the
Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for Spokane Valley. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous.
Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
6a — Addendum to the CenterPlace Project
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Wilhite and seconded by Councilmember Denenny, to approve the
CenterPlace addendum and give the City Manager the authority to approve the changes in the contract.
Engineer Worley explained this change order to the CenterPlace Project as per the accompanying Request
for Council Action form, he stated that bids were received for the construction and completion of the
classrooms and can now be completed within the project budget; that the contractor has requested
$315,155 and ten additional weeks to complete the work and will guarantee this price until the end of
September; and in an effort to keep the construction of CenterPlace moving forward, it is also requested
that the City Manager be granted authority for an additional $50,000 in change orders for Mooney &
Pugh's contract. Deputy Mayor Wilhite moved, seconded by Councilmember Denenny, to amend the
motion to add authorizing the City Manager an additional $50,000 in change order authority. Vote to
amend the motion: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Further
discussion ensued regarding the projects, funding issues, the college use of the area, and that an
agreement with the college is almost finalized for use of the five rooms and a server room. Mayor
DeVleming invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote on the amended motion to approve
the CenterPlace addendum, give the City Manager the authority to approve the changes in the contract,
and authorize the City Manager an additional $50, 000 in change order authority: In Favor: Unanimous.
Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
6b Appointment to Student Advisory Council — Mayor DeVleming
It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to appoint Jill Burgard as
the "student at large." Mayor DeVleming added that the Student Advisory Council is writing by -laws
and desires to have this vacancy filled as soon as possible to get the benefit of an older student. Mayor
DeVleming invited public comment; no comments were offered. In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None.
Abstentions: None. Motion carried.
Mayor DeVleming called for short break at 7:20 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENTS: No comments were offered
ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: [no public comment]
7. Regional Convention & Visitor's Bureau Update, Tourism Promotion Budget — Ron Anderson
Mr. Ron Anderson gave an update on the Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau, Tourism Promotion
Budget, and said that he represents the Spokane Hotel /Motel Association as well as the Hotel
Commission; that he appreciates our endorsement for the TPA interlocal; that the Hotel Commission of
eight commissioners (four representing downtown Spokane hotels, two representing unincorporated
areas, and two representing the Spokane Valley) voted unanimously to support marketing efforts of both
the Spokane Regional Sports Commission and the Regional Convention and Visitor's Bureau; he
mentioned the grants available to assist the organizations, the marketing plans which have been approved
by the County Commissioners, convention forecasting; and of the current staff's efforts in all these areas.
In response to a request from Councilmember Taylor, Eric Soyer spoke of the Sports Commission's
assets and goals; that they are working on their sports events to be in a stronger position to be more
effective to bring in even more events. John Brewer mentioned his goals relating to increasing room
nights and economic development over the next eighteen months to generate an additional $70,000 in
additional room nights, that they are working to hire an additional support staff and four additional sales
Council Meeting Minutes of 9 -28 -04 Page 4 of 6
Approved: 10 -12 -04
staff; that some items are specific to the Fair and Expo Center and some items are specific to Mirabeau
Point; that there will be twenty -two international tour travel planners arriving within the next week and
weekend from Germany, Italy, France and the UK; that they will start their tour with a two -hour bike ride
on the Centennial Tail; and that future projects they are working with include the Fox Theater, Science
Center, and support of Mirabeau and the Fair Expo Center.
8. Community Development Block Grant Application Process — Greg McCormick
Long Range Planning Manager McCormick gave an overview of the 2005 Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) process, went over the background of the City joining in the CDBG Consortium in
June 2003, that we are eligible to apply for funding through Spokane County; that the CDBG funds target
low and moderate income households; that the City received over $396,000 in 2004; and discussed
upcoming timelines including dates for future public hearings.
9. Overview of Draft Comprehensive Plan — Marina Sukup /Greg McCormick
Long Range Planning Manager McCormick went through his PowerPoint presentation on the
Comprehensive Plan 2005 -2025 overview; which discussed the timetable, items for discussion, and
common themes; and Director Sukup explained some of the hot topics such as neighborhood presentation
issues, transportation issues, City Center, community feedback, and the next steps for council; she
mentioned the goal is to get most of the community feedback at meetings set for early November; and to
assemble and digest that information for council dissemination by early December.
10. Boundary Review Board Process — Cary Driskell
Before Deputy City Attorney Driskell explained this issue, Mayor DeVleming excused Attorney
Schwartz, who removed himself from the dais. Deputy City Attorney Driskell explained the background
of the issue as per his September 28, 2004 Request for Council Action form, concerning Liberty Lake's
intent to annex 644 acres between the two cities; he went over the issues including the Boundary Review
Board process; and advised council that if they want to further appeal, we must participate by submitting
a letter to the BRB outlining Spokane Valley's concerns with Liberty Lake's request, consistent with the
statutory requirements. Council stated it had no objection to continue. Attorney Schwartz returned to the
dais.
It was moved by Mayor DeVleming and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan to extend the meeting to
9:15 p.m. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor DeVleming, Deputy Mayor Wilhite, and
Councilmembers Schimmels, Flanigan, and Denenny. Opposed: Councilmember Taylor. Abstentions:
None. Motion carried.
11. Scooters (safety /nuisance) — Cary Driskell /Josh Leonard
Deputy City Attorney Driskell and Legal Intern Josh Leonard gave their PowerPoint presentation on the
issue of motorized scooters and how they affect nuisance /noise and safety concerns. In response to
specific questions, Council said they feel 16 should be the age limit; nighttime operating should be
permissible with WSP approved lamps and reflectors; and that brakes should be required. After
discussing the issues and listening to concerns voiced by Police Chief Walker, it was mentioned that the
City of Spokane has an excellent draft ordinance and we should coordinate our efforts with theirs, and
that staff can return to council within a few weeks to consider items to be added to or omitted from the
draft ordinance. Other items to consider in such an ordinance including whether to ban passengers,
require helmets (Spokane requires a motorcycle helmet for gas powered scooters), ban sidewalk use from
gas powered scooters; address the use of the Centennial trail, ban the use on city property and in parks,
address bike lanes, arterial use, and overall safety on streets.
Council Meeting Minutes of 9 -28 -04 Page 5 of 6
Approved: 10 -12 -04
Before adjourning Deputy City Manager Regor reminded Council to submit their proposed allocations for
outside agency funding for 2005, as soon as possible.
There being no further business, it was moved by Councilmember Flanigan, seconded, and unanimously
agreed upon to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m.
AT
ristine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Michael DeVleming, May
Council Meeting Minutes of 9 -28 -04 Page 6 of 6
Approved: 10 -12 -04
NAME
PLEASE PRINT
TOPIC OF CONCERN
ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
3061
5 ) I;1
I
L ,
/i:1f6 6 ezedey
Ca ,2(... S j-bU PI
)62 - ac91
3 , 4 I (
Q lA
A.
D V vv,
,l,Lt
,'O /
I / _ )
Splikane�
�Ualley
PUBLIC COMMENT SIGN -IN SHEET
SPOKANE VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
DATE q /,2g //)e
Citizen comments on any item. Please state your name and address for the record. Your
time will be limited to THREE MINUTES.
Spokane Valley City Council Invocation
September 28, 2004
Pastor David Johnson
Spokane Valley United Methodist Church
Let us focus our thoughts on the one who has created all that is.
God from the beginning of time you have placed in every tribe and nation the
yearning for something beyond self. We take this moment to say thank you God for
the gift of life that you have given us to live with purpose, integrity and compassion.
Tonight we gather as leaders, employees and public to improve the quality of life in
our Spokane Valley. You have set aside certain people to be our leaders. Give each
of them the courage to lead as they discern and decide where we will be going
tomorrow and in the days to come.
You have called others to be gainfully employed to do the daily work of study,
research, data entry, planning and policing our community. May the proposals and
reports they present tonight be the best they can be.
You have given others of us as public the freedom to express our thoughts. May you
bring us wisdom and selflessness as we share our thoughts and our passions with
our leadership.
May your will be done this night.
Thanks be to God.
Amen
Spokane
jUalley
2005 Community
Development Block
Grant Program
September 28, 2004
Background
• City joined County CDBG Consortium in
June 2003
• City eligible to apply for CDBG funding
through Spokane County
• CDBG funds targets low /moderate income
households
• Low /Moderate Income Area -wide Benefit -
49.2% Households under 80% AHI
• City received over $396,000 in 2004
Upcoming Timelines
• 10/12/04 - Council discussion of potential
projects
• 10/26/04 - Public hearing on CDBG projects
• 11/12/04 - CDBG Applications due to County
• 1/05 - HCDAC review of CDBG Applications
• 3/05 - HCDAC Public Hearing on project
recommendations
• 4/05 - County Commissioners review of HCDAC
Recommendations
• 4/05 - BoCC Hearing on Annual Action Plan
• 5/05 - 2005 Annual Action Plan to HUD for 45-
day review
• 7/05 - Anticipated start of 2004 Program Year
2005 CDBG Program
Questions?
si�i
jUalley
Vision (drrat)
Comprehensive Plan 2005 -2025
Overview
September 28, 20
Community Development Department
"Spokane Valley: a community of
opportunity where families and
individuals can grow and play, and
businesses will flourish and prosper."
1
Timetable
Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation
Ackoinn Pnxess
Discussion Draft
• Meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act.
the Countywide Planning Policies, state and federal
mandates.
• Benchmark existing conditions. nis wiii permit future
updates to track progress over time.
• Consolidate the requirements and standards included
in other documents and the plans of other agencies
• Explain the interdependencies between Plan elements
and provide a readable explanation of the elements of
issues.
• Provide a roadmap for future policy consideration and
action, including regulatory requirements, levels of
service. capital Improvements and financing
40 Mo..
Ow
,, 11111i
11m10
J
•■•■ it ip , ►T Y t■
{Yr
- ��a�_ -ccM - :_roc• -
11,,,
1.11111,>01.
Vo
-_—
■ :911
YveY.
u.
,
D141 Oftw..t
•
Q Zam
w. M+ew
.::am
rhOG+
■ 1. /
+q...s
gg
1
Where
Timetable
Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulation
Ackoinn Pnxess
Discussion Draft
• Meet the requirements of the Growth Management Act.
the Countywide Planning Policies, state and federal
mandates.
• Benchmark existing conditions. nis wiii permit future
updates to track progress over time.
• Consolidate the requirements and standards included
in other documents and the plans of other agencies
• Explain the interdependencies between Plan elements
and provide a readable explanation of the elements of
issues.
• Provide a roadmap for future policy consideration and
action, including regulatory requirements, levels of
service. capital Improvements and financing
Common Themes
• Spokane Valley is a safe place to live
Quality of police service
Quality of fire protection service
Common Themes
• Opinion of existing services
s L
/Ink
1% 17 -11 1 -11111.111.1.1
Imo 14o 1114.11 Ilegripml turbo
r.
Quality of library services
Quality of street maintenance
.3
Common Themes
Community Identity is important to City's future
,.. 1100.■
r.... ..,...
40.00 WIN
0.10011 011101•11
Importance of Curving a
community identity
Does Spokane Valley have an
Identity
.No
4Yes
'0
Mo d ta er9NeirCeis
1
4
Hot Topics!
• Neighborhood Preservation
• Strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations
(Land Use)
• Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent
non - residential uses. (Land Use)
• Revise existing land use regulations to provide for
innovation and flexibility in the design of new single -
family developments and in -fill (Land Use)
a Street design should provide for full connectivity
between residential neighborhoods and discourage
iii iiimmik_ cut-through traffic, (Transportation)
Hot. Topics!
• Neighborhood Preservation
• Design guidelines with buffer zones and transition
requirements. (Housing & Neighborhoods)
o Support programs targeted at neighborhood
preservation. including Weed and Seed, housing
rehabilitation, etc. (Housing & Neighborhoods)
e Encourage the development of neighborhood
associations and work with these groups to refine
neighborhood plans. (Housing & Neighborhoods)
Reduce the adverse impacts of freight and air traffic
movements through requirements for noise
attenuation adjacent to residential land uses.
(Transportation)
Hlot: Topics!'
• Transportation
• Preserve the Community's Investment in
Infrastructure
• Roadway Impact Fees
• Limit direct access from individual properties to
arterial and collector roads
• Include sidewalks in City street reconstruction and
improvement projects
• Supplement bikeways with off -road trails to access
residential subdivisions. employment centers, schools
and recreation facilities.
• Support the development of light rail (LRT) to U -City
and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) to Liberty Lake
Support the 'Bridging the Valley' project to reduce the
number of at -grade railroad aossuigs_
Hot Topics!
• Transportation
• Discourage development of low- density residential
development in close proximity to designated freight
corridors and intermodal freight facilities.
• Utilize traffic calming strategies to reduce vehicular
speeds where appropriate.
Hot, Topics!
• City Center
• Location
• Size
• New streets would be added at every 200 - 400 feet to create an
internal grid
OPolirom owl loom
limo we 4P
'Now M
Ilimnik Oft we
3Dti IR WI IR 1091
33%.
• r-=295 I
:09.
SwF SE Make Iwo. Imearse Or,
ampistall immelos 4AN1 rMYo
Best location for City Center Importance of having a City Center
tY� *ma.. butyl limw >
WWI WEN IISPet
Hot Topics!
• City Center
• New streets every 200 - 400 feet to create an internal grid
- On- street parking would be provided on internal grid streets
- Ground floor retail on both sides of streets
■ n=393 I
Extend Appleway oast Extend Couplet east to Evergreen
317
0%
- sere wino foreal WINO
WPM Wow =PPM
Hot Topics!
• City Center
• Building out to the edge of right -of -way and include
wide sidewalks to encourage a lively street scene.
• Office /Employment uses provided in high visibility
locations with adequate parking and adjacent to
pleasant surroundings such as open space, retail
shops and services_
• Multi family housing buffered from traffic noise and
provides a pedestnan friendly streetscape with
connections to parks, schools, shopping, services and
transit.
Civic/public uses such as city hall, community library,
performing arts center or other public uses
Next. Steps for Council
• Resolution of the "Hot Topics" through the
public involvement process
• Identification of 3-6 "Core Values" — those
principles which will assist Planning
Commission and Council in assessing
priorities and strategies e.g. Customer
Service, Business friendly
Determination of acceptable Level of
Service Standards
8
Community Feedback
• Impact on existing business of a change in motor
vehicle traffic during the 5, 10 and 20 year planning
horizon. Traffic forecast data will be coordinated
through the SRTC
• Impact on existing businesses of construction during a
5 year period
• Economic opportunities created by the extension of
Appleway to Sullivan and the opportunity cost of the
failure to extend Appleway during the 5, 10 and 20 year
planning period.
e) Barriers to successful redevelopment of the Corridor.
including institutional and regulatory barriers
9
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: September 28, 2004 City Manager Sign -off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ® old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report I❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Centerplace — Change Order for Completion of 2 " Floor 'A' Wing
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council awarded the Centerplace construction
contract to Mooney & Pugh Contractors, Inc. in March 2004. Council has also approved several
change orders to the construction contract prior to delegating change order authority (up to
$50,000) to the City Manager.
BACKGROUND: During the design of the Centerplace project it was decided, for cost saving
purposes, to delete the completion of the second floor Education Wing (Wing °A'). The plans
that went out to bid in February 2004 did not include any electrical or mechanical equipment for
these classrooms on the second floor and also did not include any wall, ceiling or floor finishes.
The bids received for the construction of Centerplace were favorable and completion of the
second floor classrooms can now be completed within the project budget. The Contractor has
requested $315,155.00 and 10 additional weeks to complete this work. The Contractor can
guarantee this price until the end of September.
The current completion date for Centerplace is May 31, 2005. With the additional work
associated with this proposed change order the completion date would be extended to August
9, 2005.
A lease for five second -floor classrooms is currently being negotiated with the Community
Colleges of Spokane. Approval of this proposed changed order is the only feasible option for
finalizing these negotiations.
City staff and the Project Architect have reviewed the cost and schedule impacts associated
with this change order and recommend Council approval.
On April 27, 2004 the City Council approved Resolution No. 04 -012 granting authority to the City
Manager for change orders up to $50,000 per project. The City Manager has currently
authorized change orders on Mooney & Pugh's contract for the construction of Centerplace in
the amount of $44,222.00.
In an effort to keep the construction of Centerplace moving forward in a timely manner, it is
requested that the City Manager be granted authority for an additional $50,000.00 in change
orders for Mooney & Pugh's contract for Centerplace.
OPTIONS: Approve or not approve the proposed change order, approve or not approve an
additional $50,000 in change order authority to the City Manager.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: That the Council authorize the City Manager to
approve and sign Mooney & Pugh's $315,155 change order for the completion of the second
floor of Wing 'A' of Centerplace and approve the City Manager an additional $50,000 in change
order authority for Mooney & Pugh's contract for the construction of Centerplace.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: This change order will increase the construction contract
amount by $315,155.00. This would bring the total construction contract amount to
$7,634,284.00. The project budget has sufficient funds to cover this change order.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Mike Jackson
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Cost estimate from Mooney & Pugh Contractors, Inc.
P Dr8reag 4 wi i pclfFatt %Ilai version www.pdffactory.com
Estimate Report
Job: Centerpiece COR 21, RFP 8
T Ref Description AdJQty Units AdJUnitCost Labor Matorlal Equip Sub Other XtdCost
M 08.1 HM Frame 1.00 EA 90,00 0.0D 90.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 590.00
M 08.2 Wood Door & Hardwaro 1.00 EA 388.0D 0.00 388.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5388.00
S 08.2 Install Doors & Hardware 1.00 EA 75.0D 0.00 0,00 0.00 75.00 0.00 575.00
5 09,1 OW B. Framing, Paint, Ceilings 1.00 LS 49,607.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 49,607.00 0.00 549,607.00
S 09.2 Flooring 1.00 IS 17,691.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 17,691.00 0,00 817,691.00
L 09.3 Floor Prep 6,700.00 SF 0.25 1,675.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 51,875.00
M 09.4 Floor Prep 6,700.00 SF 0.02 0.00 134.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5134.00
S 13.5 Fire Proloc9on 1.00 LS 7,380.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7,380.00 0.00 57,380.00
S 15.4 Plumbing w/o All 1 1.00 LS 6,365.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,305.21 0.00 $6,365.21
S 15.7 HVAC 1.00 LS 60,236.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 60,238.00 0.00 560,236.00
S 16.1 Electrical 1.00 LS 90,442.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 90,442.00 0.00 190,442.00
A 201- Adrnin Administration 1.00 LS 945.00 720.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 125.00 5845.00
A 201 -(pc General Conditions per diem 57.00 DAY 516.71 21.102.00 0.00 2,992.50 0.00 5,358.00 529,452.50
O 98.91 Small Tools (Labor) 3,00 % 234.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 704.91 1704.91
O 99.88 Buildor'e Risk 0.25 % 3,151.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 787.89 1787.89
O 99.89 Liability Insurance 1.50 % 3,151.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,727.34 54,727.34
Q 99.90 Feo on Contractor's Work 10.00 % 388.05 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,880.46 53,860.40
Q 99.91 Fee on Subcca tractor's Work 6.00 % 2,317.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13,907.77 513,907.77
R 89.05 Performance Bond 1.00 % 3,151.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,151.56 53.151.56
T 99.99 WSST 8.10 % 2,915.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,614.79 523,614,79
523,497.00 5812.00 52992.60 5231,798.21 558,287.73 1315,155.44
Mooney and Puoh Contractors. Inc. Page 1 of 1