Loading...
2014, 04-01 Study SessionAGENDA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET STUDY SESSION Tuesday, April 1, 2014 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT /ACTIVITY GOAL ROLL CALL: 1. Steve Worley Pedestrian/Bicycle Safety, Safe Routes Discussion /Information To School Call for Projects 2. Erik Lamb Proposed Findings of Fact, Interim Discussion /Information Marijuana Regulations 3. John Hohman, Scott Kuhta, Comprehensive Plan Process Overview Discussion /Information Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb 4. Cary Driskell Open Public Meetings Act Training Discussion /Information 5. Mayor Grafos Advance Agenda Discussion /Information 6. Mayor Grafos Council Comments Discussion /Information 7. Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion /Information ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda, April 1, 2014 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 1, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Potential Projects for the 2014 Call for Projects for Safe Routes to School (SRTS) and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Programs GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Information RCA, March 25, 2014 BACKGROUND: The WSDOT (Washington State Department of Transportation) has issued a Call for projects for the statewide Safe Routes to School and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Grant programs. This call is in preparation for congressional and /or state legislature to award funding for projects. Currently, $8 million is anticipated statewide for both programs. The WSDOT call for projects consists of two funding categories and two types of projects. The Safe Routes to School program solicits projects that address school traffic safety, access and mobility. Projects may include sidewalk improvements, traffic calming and speed reduction improvements, and pedestrian and bicycle crossing improvements. The application deadline for Safe Routes to School is May 5, 2014. The second WSDOT funding category and call for projects is the Pedestrian and Bicycle Program. This program solicits projects that are more regional in nature with an emphasis on pedestrian, bicycle, and transit networks. Projects of these types are facilities or systems to safely connect other walking, biking or transit links. Projects need to show that they provide better and safer access to such things as isolated neighborhoods, workplaces, commercial and recreational attractions. The application deadline for the Pedestrian and Bicycle Program is May 11, 2014. Staff has begun evaluating the proposed grant criteria and has identified a draft list of projects to review with council. Information used to develop this draft list of projects includes: • Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Bicycle & Pedestrian Master Program • School District and School Administrators, "Safe Route to School Plans" • Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Traffic Control for School Areas, and • Aerial photography and site visits. Following are suggested projects for each of the programs: Safe Routes to School Program • Seth Woodard Elementary Sidewalk Improvement Project o Install new sidewalks on both sides of N Park Road from E Broadway to E Mission Avenues. Intersection improvements to meet ADA requirements will be installed at the intersections of N Park Road and E Sharp, E Sinto, E Maxwell, E Boone, E Cataldo, and E Mission Avenues. o Infill new sidewalk on the north side of E Mission Avenue from the NE corner of N Park Road to recently installed sidewalk approximately 200' east to complete the sidewalk serving the residential development, and o Enhance the existing school crossing on E Mission Avenue, just west of N Bowman Road, to install new sidewalk and ADA compliant ramps. • Opportunity Elementary Sidewalk Improvement Project o Install new sidewalks on both sides of Bowdish Road from S 8th to S 16th Avenues. Include ADA compliant ramps and corner treatment at S Bowdish Road and 8th, 9th 10th 11th 12th and 16th Avenues. o Install new sidewalks on both sides of E 12th Avenue from S Bowdish Road to S Wilbur Road. Extend the south sidewalk to the existing school crossing near Fox Road, and o Infill new sidewalk on the north side of E 12th Avenue from the existing sidewalk adjacent to Opportunity Elementary School to S Union Road. Enhance the existing school crossing at E 12th Avenue and S Fox Road to an ADA compliant school crossing. • Progress Elementary Sidewalk Improvement Project o Install new sidewalks on both sides of N Progress Road from just north of E Sprague Avenue north to E Broadway Avenue. Include ADA compliant ramps and corner treatment at the intersection of N Progress Road and E Valleyway Avenue, and o Install new sidewalks on both sides of E Valleyway Avenue from N Adams east to N Sullivan Road. Include ADA compliant ramps and corner treatment at the intersections of E Valleyway Avenue and N Adams, N Burns, and N Sommer Roads. • Trentwood Elementary Sidewalk and Bike Lane Improvement Project o Install new sidewalk and bike lanes on both sides of N Evergreen Road from E Trent Avenue (SR -290) north to E Wellesley Avenue. Include ADA compliant ramps and corner treatment at the intersections of N Evergreen Road and E Trent, E Rockwell, E Rich, E Heroy, and E Wellesley Avenues. Pedestrian and Bicycle Program • Appleway Trail, Phase 3 — S Evergreen Road to S Corbin Road o Install a new shared use path in the old railroad right -of -way beginning at S Evergreen Road east to S Corbin Road. Include pedestrian hybrid beacons at S Evergreen Road and S Sullivan Road, and include rapid rectangle flashing beacons at S Adams, S Progress, S Conklin, and S Flora Roads. • N Park Road Sidewalk and Bike Lane Improvement Project o Extend sidewalks and bike lanes on both sides of N Park Road from E Indiana Avenue north through railroad crossing to E Trent Avenue (SR -290). Include ADA compliant ramps and corner treatment at the intersections of N Park Road and E Indiana Avenue, and at the intersection of N Park Road and E Trent Avenue (SR -290). • E Indiana Avenue Sidewalk to Transit Stops east of N Pines Road o Install new sidewalks from the N Pines Road and E Indiana Avenue intersection east to the existing bus stops on the north and south sides of E Indiana Avenue. Include pedestrian staging areas /pads at the bus stop locations. • Evergreen Bike Lane Enhancement Project, 1 -90 (IC 291) o Signing and Striping modifications and enhancements for motorist awareness and positive guidance for the bicyclist from E Mission Avenue to E Indiana Avenue. • N Long Road, E Boone Avenue north to E Mission Avenue, Sidewalk Improvement Project o Install sidewalk along N Long Road to the park on the NE corner of N Long Road and E Boone Ave north to E Mission Avenue, and o Install ADA compliant ramps and corner treatment at the intersections of N Long Road and E Maxwell Avenue, and at the intersection of N Long Road and E Mission Avenue. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: No financial match is required for these projects. However, if it is determined that a match may enhance the chance of success, the City Manager may approve a match up to 5 %. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, P.E., Senior Capital Projects Engineer; Eric Guth, P.E., Public Works Director. ATTACHMENTS: Vicinity Maps for Safe Routes to School • Seth Woodard Elementary School • Opportunity Elementary School • Progress Elementary School • Trentwood Elementary School Vicinity Maps for Pedestrian and Bicycle Program • Appleway Trail Phase 3 • Park Sidewalk & Bike Lane Improvement • Indiana Sidewalk & Transit Stops • Evergreen Bike Lane Enhancement Project • Long, Boone to Mission Sidewalk Improvement Safe Routes to School 7 T48 SETH WOODARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SETH WOODARD SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 500 250 0 500 1000 SCALE FEET LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK Siokane Valley SETH WOODARD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXHIBIT SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS DRAWN SY: DATE: RPS 3/26/2014 CHECKED BY: DATE: RJW 3/25/2014 NEW SIDEWALK, TYP. OPPORTUNITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT 1 OPPORTUNITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 500 250 0 500 '1000 SCALE FEET III EMI MO LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK Spokane ,�.•' 'Valley OPPORTUNITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXHIBIT SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS DRAWN BY: RPB DATE: 3/26/2014 CHECKED BY: RJW DATE: 3/26/2014 P.'F,bEo Wcr4�' 500 250 PROGRESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT N.EW- SIDEWALK, TYP. 0 500 1 000 SCALE FEET LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK erez tar .0000Valley PROGRESS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXHIBIT SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS DRAWN BY: DATE: RPB 3/20/2014 CHECKED BY: DATE: RJW 3/26/2014 C.j.ul jxts Prej e,t FL3 }L+ 3 TRENTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT TRENWOOD_ - EvIENTARY SCHOOL - �oililr EAiVDiII1IUlI�I a= 1lllli r rtt'rw1.1©r111m1 go maim MILIA 11111 Will lila TRENT (5R -290) 500 250 0 500 1000 SCALE FEET CEP mu I LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND BIKE LANE Spokane d Valley TRENTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL EXHIBIT SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOLS DRAWN BY: DATE: RPB 3/26/2014 CHECKED BY: DATE: RJW 3/26/2014 Pedestrian and Bicycle Pro. ram MATCH LINE APPLEWAY TRAIL PHASE 3 PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM ii�rn1 i 1!!... 1111: 11101: SIMI= Li RAI �� 10 � r -. ill �1 ••• le w J it ■ ■.i ■� =e Z rY 0 1000 500 0 1000 2000 SCALE FEET z 1 D LEGEND =1r MCI NEW SHARED USE PATH, TYP. PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SHARED USE PATH z Z 0 U Spokane .0'0Va11ey APPLEWAY TRAIL PHASE 3 EXHIBIT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM DRAWN BY: RPB CHECKED BY: RJW DATE: 3/26/2014 DATE: 3/26/2014 1 Pm; as r,j, t Funtiq Apt'kz PARK SIDEWALK AND BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM ■111.• LEGEND 200 100 0 PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK AND IKE LANE 200 400 SCALE FEET Sfrokane �•' Valley, PARK SIDEWALK AND BIKE LANE IMPROVEMENT EXHIBIT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM DRAWN EY: DATE: RPB 3/26/2014 CHECKED BY: DATE: RJW 3/26/2014 K 4 9 INDIANA SIDEWALK AND TRANSIT STOPS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM CO w Z 0 NEW SIDEWALK, TYP. STA BUS STOPS 100 50 0 100 200 SCALE FEET LEGEND PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK Spokane �,1. Valley. E INDIANA SIDEWALK AND TRANSIT STOPS EXHIBIT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM DRAWN BY: DATE: RPB 3/26/2014 CHECKED BY: DATE: RJW 3/26/2014 EVERGREEN BIKE LANE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, 1 -90 (IC 291) PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM PPM MI LEGEND 300 150 0 PROJECT LIMITS BIKE LANE ENHANCEMENTS 300 500 SCALE FEET Spokane ,•••O Valley EVERGREEN BIKE LANE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT, 1 -90 (IC 291) EXHIBIT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM DRAWN BY: DATE: RPB 3/25/2014 CHECKED BY: DATE: RJW 3/26/2014 LONG, BOONE NORTH TO MISSION, SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM 0 0 NEW SIDEWALK, TYP. LEGEND - - 300 150 0 PROJECT LIMITS PROPOSED SIDEWALK 300 600 SCALE FEET Sfiedee\'' .00 Valley. LONG, BOONE NORTH TO MISSION, SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT EXHIBIT PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM DRAWN BY: RPB CHECKED BY: RJW DATE: 3/26/2014 DATE: 3/26/2014 Meeting Date: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action April 1, 2014 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report on Proposed Ordinance adopting findings of fact and amendments to interim marijuana regulations GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.390; RCW 69.50 (Initiative 502 has been codified as RCW 69.50); WAC 314 -55; SVMC 19.85; SVMC 19.120. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On February 11, 2014, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 14 -002 adopting interim development regulations for recreational marijuana. On March 25, 2014, City Council conducted a public hearing on Ordinance No. 14 -002. BACKGROUND: During the February 11, 2014 City Council meeting, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 14 -002, which adopted interim marijuana regulations. Specifically, Ordinance No. 14 -002 adopted findings; adopted definitions for marijuana production, processing, and sales; specified zones where marijuana production, processing, and sales were allowed that were consistent with prior administrative determinations for such uses; and adopted buffers of 1,000 feet between recreational marijuana uses and the Centennial Trail, Old Milwaukee Right - of -Way (commonly known as Appleway Trail), vacant and undeveloped public school property, and vacant and undeveloped public library property. Further, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.390, Ordinance No. 14 -002 set a public hearing on the interim marijuana regulations for March 25, 2014. On March 25, 2014, City Council conducted the required hearing on Ordinance No. 14 -002. Written public comment was received from five interested parties. Based on issues raised since the adoption of Ordinance No. 14 -002, staff discussed and proposed three possible amendments to the interim recreational marijuana regulations. Staff recommended the following potential amendments to the interim regulations: (1) modify the buffer on the Centennial Trail to only apply to property on the same side of the River as the Trail (e.g., the buffer would only apply to property on the south side of the River when the trail is on the south side of the River); (2) allow drying, bagging, and similar processing to be permitted in the same zones as production (this would allow bagging in Community Commercial and Regional Commercial); and (3) discuss buffering issues with already constructed portion of Appleway Trail (east of Tschirley), as the park elements are not present and this impacts several retail properties. Based on public comment received, City Council discussed allowing limited bagging processing in the Community Commercial and Regional Commercial zones and modifying the buffers to allow indoor production and limited bagging processing within 1,000 feet of the Centennial Trail and Appleway Trail. City Council directed staff to draft proposed language to allow the limited processing and modify the buffers. Staff has prepared draft amendments based upon City Council direction. As shown in the draft amendments, there is still the inclusion of a buffer to the Centennial Trail that prohibits all production and processing within the buffer south of the Spokane River. However, based on City Council's discussion regarding allowing indoor -only production and limited processing (bagging only) within the Appleway Trail buffer, another alternative for discussion would be to allow indoor -only production and limited processing (bagging only) within the regional commercial and community commercial zones near the Centennial Trail. This would allow the same uses as may be allowed around the Appleway Trail and would not limit production or processing in the industrial zones north of the Spokane River. Finally, based on City Council's discussion regarding the allowance of indoor -only production, City Council could consider limiting production in all zones to indoor -only. None of the proposed amendments would modify the buffers and restrictions that prohibit any marijuana retail sales within 1,000 feet of either the Centennial Trail or the Appleway Trail. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to proceed with a first reading to adopt the findings of fact and amendments to the interim recreational marijuana regulations. BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N /A. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney; Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Proposed findings of fact and amendments to SVMC 19.85 and SVMC 19.120. ATTACHMENT FOR COUNCIL REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION FOR FINDINGS OF FACT AND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO ORDINANCE NO. 14 -002 Proposed Findings of Fact. The City Council hereby adopts the following as Findings of Fact in support of Ordinance No. 14 -002 and this Ordinance: 1. Since 1970, federal law has prohibited the manufacture and possession of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, based on the federal government's categorization of marijuana as having a "high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment." Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005), Controlled Substance Act (CSA), 84 Stat. 1242, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq. 2. On November 6, 2012, voters of the State of Washington approved Initiative Measure No. 502 (I -502), now codified in chapters 69.50, 46.04, 46.20, 46.21, and 46.61 Revised Code of Washington (RCW), which provisions, (a) decriminalized possession and use of certain amounts of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia; (b) amended state laws pertaining to driving under the influence of intoxicants to include driving under the influence of marijuana; and (c) established a regulatory system licensing producers, processors, and retailers of recreational marijuana for adults 21 years of age and older, and required the Washington State Liquor Control Board (the LCB) to adopt procedures and criteria by December 1, 2013 for issuing licenses to produce, process, and sell marijuana. 3. On August 29, 2013, the United States Department of Justice issued a memo providing updated guidance on marijuana enforcement in response to the adoption of I -502. Several ongoing federal enforcement priorities were outlined, including prevention of crime and preventing distribution of marijuana to minors. Further, the memo provided that the Department would not seek ongoing prosecution of marijuana providers, users, and local officials in states that authorized marijuana, provided that those state and local governments "implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public health, and other law enforcement interests. A system adequate to that task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be effective in practice." 4. On October 16, 2013, the LCB adopted rules pertaining to the licensing of marijuana producers, processors, and retailers, as set forth in chapter 314 -55 Washington Administrative Code (WAC). 5. Pursuant to the rules established in chapter 314 -55 WAC, the LCB opened a 30 -day application period and is currently processing and approving license applications received for marijuana producer, processor, and retailer licenses. 6. Pursuant to RCW 69.50.331(8) and WAC 314 -55- 050(10), the LCB is prohibited from licensing any marijuana producers, processors, and retailers within 1,000 feet of the perimeter of the grounds of any elementary or secondary school, playground, recreation center or facility, child care center, public park, excluding trails, public transit center, library, or any game arcade admission to which is not restricted to persons aged twenty -one years or older. 7. Pursuant to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.20.050, City staff made an administrative interpretation and determination based on similar current permitted uses to permit licensed marijuana producers in light industrial and heavy industrial zones and for indoor -only production in regional commercial and community commercial zones. 1 8. Pursuant to SVMC 19.20.050, City staff made an administrative determination based on similar current permitted uses to permit licensed marijuana processors in light industrial and heavy industrial zones. 9. Pursuant to SVMC 19.20.050, City staff made an administrative determination based on similar current permitted uses to permit licensed marijuana retailers in mixed use center, corridor mixed use, community commercial, and regional commercial zones. 10. The City Council finds and determines that the Centennial Trail and proposed Appleway Trail are trails that are and will be regularly used by the citizens of the City, including minors, and adopting the regulations identified adopted in Ordinance No. 14 -002 and herein will be consistent with the identified federal enforcement priorities and especially in preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors. 11. Pursuant to Article 11, Section 11 of the Washington Constitution, the City of Spokane Valley is authorized to "make and enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws," which includes the adoption of regulations governing land uses within the City. 12. On January 16, 2014, the Washington Attorney General issued Attorney General Opinion No. 2, in which he stated that "[although Initiative 502 (I -502) establishes a licensing and regulatory system for marijuana producers, processor, and retailers in Washington State, it includes no clear indication that it was intended to preempt local authority to regulate such businesses. We therefore conclude that I -502 left in place the normal powers of local governments to regulate within their jurisdictions." 13. The City Council finds and determines that I -502 does not preempt the City of Spokane Valley from exercising and administering its constitutional and statutory land use regulatory authority to allow and regulate land uses within the City limits 14. RCW 36.70A.390 provides that "A county or city governing body that adopts a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control without holding a public hearing on the proposed moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control, shall hold a public hearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, whether or not the governing body received a recommendation on the matter from the planning commission or department. If the governing body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the governing body shall do so immediately after this public hearing. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control adopted under this section may be effective for not longer than six months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related studies providing such a longer period. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance or interim official control may be renewed for one or more six -month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal." 15. Interim zoning controls enacted under RCW 35A.63.220 and /or RCW 36.70A.390 are methods by which local governments may preserve the status quo so that new plans and regulations will not be rendered moot by intervening development. 16. RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 both authorize the enactment of a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control prior to holding a public hearing. 2 17. Absent the interim regulations, the LCB would have begun issuing licenses that could have frustrated the City's effective planning and undermined the City's authority and ability to effectively regulate marijuana production, processing, and sales. 18. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, the City Council conducted a public hearing on Ordinance No. 14 -002 on March 25, 2014. 19. The City Council received public comment from five interested parties. The City Council considered all public comment received. 20. Modifications to the recreational marijuana buffers and zoning established in SVMC 19.85 will continue to protect the City's citizens, including minors, and will be consistent with the identified federal enforcement priorities and especially in preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors. 21. The interim regulations implement development regulations consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 21. The City Council finds that the land use limitations and buffering requirements established by Ordinance No. 14 -002 and this Ordinance are necessary for the preservation of the public health, public safety, public property and public peace. 3 Proposed Amendments 19.85.010 — Marijuana Production Standards. A. Marijuana production shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest 1 property line of the use listed in subsections (1) through (43) of this section. Distance shall be measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana production to the nearest property line of the following uses: 1 1. Centennial Trail, provided the distance shall only be measured and applied to property located south of the Spokane River; 2. All proposed, contemplated, and constructed multi use trail and linear park uses on the Milwaukee Right of Way, as identified and contcmplatcd in the Intcrlocal Agreement between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley, dated June 27, 2012; 42. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in Title 28A RCW; and 43. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in chapter 27.12 RCW. B. Marijuana production in the regional commercial and community commercial zones shall only be permitted indoors. 19.85.020 — Marijuana Processing Standards. A. Marijuana processing shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line of the use listed in subsections (AD through (D3) of this section. Distance shall be measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana processing to the nearest property line of the following uses: Al. Centennial Trail provided the distance shall only be measured and applied to property located south of the Spokane River; B. All proposed, contcmplatcd, and constructed multi use trail and linear park uses on the Milwaukee Right of Way, as identified and contemplated in the Interlocal Agreement between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley, dated June 27, 2012; G2. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in Title 28A RCW; and 133. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in chapter 27.12 RCW. B. Marijuana processing in the regional commercial and community commercial zones shall be limited to packaging and labeling of useable marijuana. 4 19.85.030 — Marijuana Retail Sales Standards. Marijuana sales shall be located or maintained at least 1,000 feet from the nearest property line of the use listed in subsections (A) through (D) of this section. Distance shall be measured from the nearest property line of the marijuana sales to the nearest property line of the following uses: A. Centennial Trail; B. All proposed, contemplated, and constructed multi -use trail and linear park uses on the Milwaukee Right -of -Way, as identified and contemplated in the Interlocal Agreement between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley, dated June 27, 2012; C. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public school districts as established in Title 28A RCW; and D. Vacant or undeveloped parcels owned by public library districts as established in chapter 27.12 RCW. 5 SVMC 19.120.010 — General Use Category /Type Residential Zone Districts Commercial and Industrial Zone Districts Supplemental Conditions 7 a' a' I : 2 2 E 2 0 U 0 0 0 () 0 cO 0 a 7 N Tavern /night club P P P P P P P Group Living Assisted living /convalescent /nursing home P P P P P P P Community residential facilities (6 residents or less) P PP PP P PP Community residential facilities (greater than 6 residents under 25) PP P PP Dwelling, congregate P P P Industrial, Heavy Assembly, heavy P Explosive storage P P Hazardous waste treatment and storage S S SVMC 21.40.060 Manufacturing, heavy P Power plant (excluding public utility facilities) P Processing, heavy P Solid waste recycling /transfer site P P Wrecking, junk and salvage yard C P Industrial, Light Assembly, light , P , P P P P Carpenter shop P P P P Machine shop or metal fabrication P P P Manufacturing, light P P P MarijLana processing S S S S SVMC 19.85 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 1, 2014 Department Director Approval Fl Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Process Overview GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140, SVMC 18.10 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley's first Comprehensive Plan was adopted April 25, 2006. The City processes annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and must conduct a major update by June 30, 2017. Council desired to have a roundtable discussion to better understand the processes related to amending and updating the Comprehensive Plan. Issues to discuss including the following: • Land Use Planning • Public Hearing — Governance Manual • Role of Planning Commission OPTIONS: Discussion only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney; John Hohman, Community Development Director; Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager ATTACHMENTS: Presentation 1 of 1 City Council Study Session Comprehensive Planning Process Overview April 1, 2014 Discussion Items • Land Use Planning — Comprehensive Plan — Annual and overall updates • Public hearing procedures and options • Role of Planning Commission 1111 11 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Division Comprehensive Planning in Washington Washington State Planning Enabling Act — RCW 36.70 Adopted 1959 and Amended 1963 "The purpose and intent of this chapter is to provide the authority for, and the procedures to be followed in, guiding and regulating the physical development of a county or region through correlating both public and private projects and coordinating their execution with respect to all subject matters utilized in developing and servicing land, all to the end of assuring the highest standards of environment for living, and the operation of commerce, industry, agriculture and recreation, and assuring maximum economies and conserving the highest degree of public health, safety, morals and welfare." 3 1111 11 la COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Growth Management Act RCW 36.70A • GMA Adopted 1990 - 1991 • Between 1960 and 1990, Washington added 1.8 million new residents • 29 of 39 counties planning under GMA 1111 11 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT -k!'47RI in: division Growth Management Act - Legislative Findings 36.70A.010 "The legislature finds that uncoordinated and unplanned growth, together with a lack of common goals expressing the public's interest in the conservation and the wise use of our lands, pose a threat to the environment, sustainable economic development, and the health, safety, and high quality of life enjoyed by residents of this state. It is in the public interest that citizens, communities, local governments, and the private sector cooperate and coordinate with one another in comprehensive land use planning. Further, the legislature finds that it is in the public interest that economic development programs be shared with communities experiencing insufficient economic growth." 5 1111 11 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A in.1 /isi0n� Growth Management Act — Planning Goals RCW 36.70A.020 (1) Urban growth. Encourage development in urban areas where adequate public facilities and services exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. (2) Reduce sprawl. Reduce the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low- density development. (3) Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans. (4) Housing. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage preservation of existing housing stock. 6 1111 11 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Growth Management Act — Planning Goals RCW 36.70A.020 (5) Economic development. Encourage economic development throughout the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, promote the retention and expansion of existing businesses and recruitment of new businesses, recognize regional differences impacting economic development opportunities, and encourage growth in areas experiencing insufficient economic growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and public facilities. (6) Property rights. Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation having been made. The property rights of landowners shall be protected from arbitrary and discriminatory actions. (7) Permits. Applications for both state and local government permits should be processed in a timely and fair manner to ensure predictability. (8) Natural resource industries. Maintain and enhance natural resource -based industries, including Productive timber, agricultural, and fisheries industries. Encourage the conservation of productive forest lands and productive agricultural lands, and discourage incompatible uses. 7 1111 11 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . in:ivision� Growth Management Act — Planning Goals RCW 36.70A.020 (9) Open space and recreation. Retain open space, enhance recreational opportunities, conserve fish and wildlife habitat, increase access to natural resource lands and water, and develop parks and recreation facilities. (10) Environment. Protect the environment and enhance the state's high quality of life, including air and water quality, and the availability of water. (11) Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process and ensure coordination between communities and jurisdictions to reconcile conflicts. (12) Public facilities and services. Ensure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development shall be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy and use without decreasing current service levels below locally established minimum standards. (13) Historic preservation. Identify and encourage the preservation of lands, sites, and structures, that have historical or archaeological significance. 8 What is a Comprehensive Plan? • Guide to community development — Physical — Social — Economic • Guide for local land use decisions — 20 -year timeframe • Community vision • Policy document — community goals not regulations 9 Comprehensive Plan Basics • An inventory of present conditions • Identification of issues • A vision for the future • Goals to address the issues and • Policies to achieve the goals • Provides the foundation for development regulations 10 Goals and Policies - Example Residential Goals & Policies Goal LUG -1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Policies LUP -1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future residential neighborhoods through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP -1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non - residential uses and /or higher intensity uses through the development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations and joint planning. LUP -1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new residential developments, accessory dwelling units and in -fill development. 11 GMA Mandatory Elements RCW 36.70A.070 • Land Use • Housing • Capital Facilities Plan • Utilities • Transportation • Economic Development • Parks and recreation • Rural (counties) 12 1111 11 la COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT D i igi6n Optional Elements • Conservation • Solar Energy • Recreation • Subarea plans RCW 36.70A.080 • Environmental protection • Natural resources lands • Design • Historic preservation • Natural hazard reduction WAC 365 - 196 -445 13 Public Involvement RCW 36.70A.140 • City must adopt public participation guidelines • Early and continuous, meaningful dialogue • Community visioning and key decision points • Options for outreach • Public workshops, meetings, hearings • Community organizations, schools • Fact sheets, newsletters, mailings • Electronic outreach — websites, social media 14 1111 11 la COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Parks & Recreation Others Economic Development Transportation Shorelines Capital Faciliti GMA Requires Coordination and Consistency 15 1111 11 la COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT in: Division Coordination and Consistency GMA Joint Planning - Interlocal Agreement • Establishes Steering Committee of Elected Officials • Mayor Grafos and Councilmember Higgins • Countywide Planning Policies • Regional framework for planning 16 GMA C oncurrency RCW 36.70A.070(6)(b) • Adequate public facilities are available when the impacts of development occur • Required for transportation • Six years from the time of development • Optional for other services — sewer, water, utilities, parks, fire, police, schools 17 Allocation of Future Growth • Population projections from Washington OFM • County leads collaborative process • Designate sufficient urban land for 20 years growth • Provide for public facilities and open space • Market factor • Counties adopt Urban Growth Areas (UGA's) 18 Unincorporated UGA City Include Study Area in UGA Remove from UGA Urban Growth Area Update Board of County Commissioners 2013 Mewl - ML S 'Planning Division BCC Res 2013 -0689 s Monle Del Ray City of Liberty Lake West Plain s Thorpe Remove from UGA 15 iiimatak � l wpm South Glenrose 12 Rudde111Tupper Medical Lake 19 one 17 Nunze Farns 16 Pro. • Jail Site Small Site Option Conationally Put in DCVO uhject to Financing For EPF Spokane County UGA's 19 'Planning Division Havana -Lyons SIGELO'. GULCH r•. 5 Bigelow Gulch UioLeus 4 Millwood 1 �� ty of 9fl s FiASU� J ty of 6 Monte Del Ray 2 2 2 EUCLID City of Liberty Lake Southeast Valle' 7 Ruddell /Tupper 8 9 Belle Terre UGA's adjacent to Spokane Valley 20 Development Regulations • Separate from the Comp Plan • GMA requires development regulations be adopted /updated to implement Comp Plan — Zoning — Critical Areas (RCW 36.70A.030,050,060,172) — Local Project Review Act (RCW 36.70B) — Shoreline regulations (RCW 90.58) 21 Comprehensive Plan Major Update RCW 36.70A.130 • City adopted its first Comp Plan on April 25, 2006 • Major update due by June 30, 2017 — Every eight years thereafter • City has taken initial steps • Process must meet all requirements of GMA 22 Comp Plan Major Update • Public engagement (bottom up process) — Helps inform decision makers to determine what is important to citizens — Gives community a voice and allows for all interests to be heard — Promotes sense of community — Helps decision makers prioritize goals 23 Comp Plan Major Update • Public Engagement Tools — Utilize web -based social media - Community survey — Workshops /open houses — School outreach — Larger community organizations and events 24 Comp Plan Major Update • State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) — GMA requires full environmental analysis — Recommend "new" Environmental Impact Statement • Scoping • Draft EIS • Final EIS • Process integrated with Comp Plan Development 25 Comp Plan Major Update • Prepare Draft Comp Plan and Draft EIS • Planning Commission Conducts Public Hearing — Make recommendation to City Council 26 Comp Plan Major Update • City Council Action — Consider all information, studies, public input • Accept PC recommendations and proceed to ordinance • Send back to PC for more hearings • Make minor modifications • Conduct own public hearing ? — Council deliberations and final decision 27 Comp Plan Annual Amendments RCW 36.70A.130 and SVMC 17.80.140 • GMA — Limits amendments to Comp Plan once per year • Annual amendments are focused updates, maintenance and site specific proposals • Possible City amendments discussed with Council in summer /fall • 60 day notice of application due date — Due November 1St • Can be City initiated (Council, Staff, PC) or privately initiated • Final docket is prepared for Council review and consensus 28 Comp Plan Annual Amendment Process SVMC 17.80.140 • Staff reviews proposals and prepares reports, recommendations, and public notice • Planning Commission reviews proposals and conducts public hearing — Deliberates and makes recommendations to Council 29 Comp Plan Annual Amendment Process SVMC 17.80.140 • City Council Review — Within 60 days must consider PC recommendations (study session) — May hold a public hearing pursuant to Governance Manual and notice requirements — Council options • Approve application • Disapprove application • Modify (if substantial, must conduct hearing or remand back to PC for public hearing) • If approved, move to first ordinance reading 30 Comprehensive Plan Appeals • Growth Management Hearings Board — Three Hearings Boards consolidated into one - 2010 — Seven Board members, two in each region — Each case heard by three Board members • Superior Court 31 Public Hearing • Public comment? • Public hearing? 32 1111 11 la COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ifl. Division Planning Commission Role SVMC 18.10 and RCW 35.63 Study and make recommendations to Council — Conduct Public Hearings — Comprehensive Plan — Development Regulations (Code Text Amendments) — Shoreline Management — Environmental Protections — Public Facilities and Capital Improvements 33 Planning Commission Role SVMC 18.10 and RCW 35.63 • PC adopts Rules of Procedure (ROP), approved by City Council • ROP specifies PC eligibility, length of term, election of officers. • ROP outlines how to conduct public meetings and hearings. 34 Questions? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: April 1, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Open Public Meeting Act Training GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 42.30 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: Staff will provide training on the City's obligations under Washington's Open Public Meeting Act under chapter 42.30 RCW. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint presentation THE OPEN PUBLIC MEETINGS ACT III Office of the City Attorney The Open Public Meetings Act Washington State law enacted in 1971 Set forth in Revised Code of Washington 42.3o et seq. Applies to all city and town councils, and many subordinate city and town boards and committees Applies to planning commissions. AGO 1971 No. 33. seofOPMA Governments "exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business." RCW 42.30.010. "The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them." Id. "The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to g p p g know." Id. "The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created." Id. use of OPMA (cont.) Maintain public's control over the government Public should have all the information on which government action is based unless specifically exempt Transparency Public trust OPMA requirements OPMA requires that: All meetings of the governing body be open to the public. All actions taken by such bodies be done at meetings that are open to the public. What is a "meeting "? There must be a "meeting" in order to trigger the requirements of the OPMA. "Meeting" means meetings at which action is taken; "Action" means the transaction of the official business of a public agency by a governing body including but not limited to receipt of public testimony, deliberations, discussions, considerations, reviews, evaluations, and final actions; Physical presence not required. Majority (quorum) implicates "meeting" rules. "Serial meetings" may collectively add up to a "meeting." What is a "meeting "? 'cont.) Email communications can constitute a meeting which violates the OPMA Solely receiving information is not a violation. Responding to email could be a violation. It is not necessary that a governing body take "final action" (a vote) for a meeting to be subject to the OPMA. Discussion regarding City matters is "action." Requires a public meeting if a quorum of members are present for the discussion. Pr Meetings irementsfor-= Outlined in detail in the Governance Manual. Some general requirements: Notice (depends on the time of meeting); Open to public unless an executive (closed) session; Votes cannot be by secret ballot; Member of public cannot be forced to give their name or other information as condition of attendance (can condition a person's ability to speak at the meeting on providing information). What is not a "meeting "? What is not a meeting: If City matters are not discussed, then the gathering is not a "meeting" subject to OPMA (even if a quorum is present). Examples: Social gatherings if City business is not discussed; Gatherings before or after official action (such as the time prior to Council meetings) so long as City business is not discussed; Meetings of other government agencies, so long as the Council /Commission members do not discuss City business amongst themselves. OPMA exceptions and exemptions No City business = no OPMA Where no official business of City is transacted, the OPMA does not apply. Perception is important. Active preparation for litigation. Executive sessions: 11+ specific circumstances, most defined by statute RCW 42.30.140 (quasi - judicial matters and collective bargaining issues) Executive sessions 4 common examples: Interviewing candidates for appointed positions; Considering the job performance of an employee; Considering the acquisition of real property where the discussion, if public, could raise the price; Discussions with legal counsel about litigation- related matters. No final decisions allowed in executive sessions Executive sessions (cont.) Less common examples: Matter affecting national security; Review negotiations on the performance of publicly bid contracts when public knowledge would cause a likelihood of increased costs; To receive and evaluate complaints or charges brought against a public officer or employee. OPMA penalties Effect of penalty The penalty for a violation of the act is direct: any action taken in violation of the OPMA is null and void; "Any person" may bring the action in superior court. Individual liability sioo penalty if they attend with knowledge that the meeting is in violation of the Act. City or City Council liability Liable for all costs, including reasonable attorney fees. Appearance of Fairness Doctrine Appearanc of Fairness doctrine Applies only to quasi - judicial matters and not to legislative ones. RCW 42.36.mo Doctrine requires government decision - makers to conduct hearings and make decisions in a way that is fair to others in appearance and fact. Test for fairness: would a fair minded person in attendance believe that (i) everyone was heard who should have been heard, and (z) the decision - makers were impartial and free from outside influences? What actions are quasi-jur'iciaP Those actions of a legislative body or planning commission that determine the legal rights, duties and privileges of specific individuals. RCW 42.36.01o. Indicators that action is quasi - judicial: Decision applies policy to a specific situation rather than setting policy. Decision has a greater impact on a limited number or people, and has only a limited impact on general public. temples of quasi-jUdThiaI actions. Quasi - judicial (handled by City Hearing Examiner): Subdivision approvals Preliminary plat approvals Conditional use permits Variances Rezones of specific parcels Discretionary zoning permits if hearing required. - Not quasi - judicial: Adoption, amendment, or revision of comprehensive plans Adoption of area-wide zoning ordinances. Adoption of area-wide zoning amendments. nearance of Fairness applied Disqualifies decision - makers from the quasi - judicial decision - making process who: have prejudged the issues; have a bias in favor of one side in the proceeding; have a conflict of interest; or cannot otherwise be impartial. Prohibits "ex parte" communications between a decision -maker and a proponent or opponent of the matter being decided during the pendency of a quasi - judicial proceeding. RCW 42.36.060 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of March 26, 2014; 11:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings April 8, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. First Reading Ordinance 14 -004 Adopting Findings of Fact, Marijuana Regulations — 3. Motion Consideration: Pedestrian/Bike Safety, Safe Rtes to School Call for Projects 4. Admin Report: Appleway Trail Grant — Mike Stone 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 6. Info Only: Adams Road Resurfacing, 4th to Sprague April 15, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Sports Commission Update — Eric Sawyer 2. Comp Plan Amendments (CPA 2014) Admin Report — Lori Barlow 3. Legislative Agenda Update — Briahna Taylor 4. 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley 5. Advance Agenda 6. Info Only: Stormwater Effectiveness Studies Consultant Agreement — [due Mon, March 31] (5 minutes) E Lamb (15 minutes) — S Worley (10 mins) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 50 minutes] [due Mon, April 7] (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (30 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) Eric Guth [ *estimated meeting: 95 minutes] April 22, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, April 14] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance 14 -004 Adopting Findings of Fact, Marijuana Regulations — E Lamb (15 minutes) 3. Proposed Resolution, Appleway Trail Grant — Mike Stone (10 minutes) 4. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Adams Road Resurfacing, 4th to Sprague — Steve Worley (10 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: (a) Appleway Landscaping Phase 1; (b) Dept Monthly Reports [ *estimated meeting: 45 minutes] April 29, 2014, No Meeting May 6, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS 1. Motion Consideration: Stormwater Effectiveness Studies Consultant Agreement — Eric Guth (15 mins) NON - ACTION ITEMS 2. Advance Agenda 3. Info Only: Stormwater CIP 2015 -2020 — Eric Guth [due Mon, April 28] (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 20 minutes] May 13, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments — Lori Barlow 3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Map — Lori Barlow 4. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Appleway Landscaping, Phase 1 — Eric Guth 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda [due Mon, May 5] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [ *estimated meeting: 50 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 3/27/2014 12:59:01 PM Page 1 of 2 May 20, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Admin Report: Stormwater CIP 2015 -2020 — Eric Guth 2. Draft 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley 3. Advance Agenda [ *estimated May 27, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments — Lori Barlow 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Map — Lori Barlow 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports June 3, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda [ *estimated June 10, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda June 17, 2014: Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Spokane Valley City Council Chambers No evening meeting June 17, 2014 June 18 -20, 2014 AWC Annual Conference, Spokane Convention Center June 24, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports July 1 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda OTHER PENDING AND /OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: ADA Transition Plan Avista Electrical Franchise CDBG (Comm Dev Block Grants) Coal /Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement Fire and Life Safety Code Future Acquisition Areas Historic Preservation Interim Marijuana Regulations expire Aug 11, 2014 Public Safety Contract, Proposed Amendment Stormwater Swales, care of Street Vacation/Connectivity Process Urban Agriculture (animals, bees, etc.) *time for public or Council comments not included [due Mon, May 12] (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) meeting: 25 minutes] [due Mon, May 19] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) meeting: 35 minutes] [due Mon, May 26] (5 minutes) [due Mon, June 2] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, June 9] [due Mon, June 16] (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, June 23] (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 3/27/2014 12:59:01 PM Page 2 of 2