2014, 04-15 Study SessionAGENDA
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET
STUDY SESSION
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT /ACTIVITY
6:00 p.m.
GOAL
ROLL CALL:
1. Briahna Taylor
2. Steve Worley
3. Lori Barlow
4. Scott Kuhta, Erik Lamb
5. Mayor Grafos
6. Mayor Grafos
7. Mike Jackson
ADJOURN
2014 Legislative Update
Draft 2015 -2020 Six Year Transportation
Plan (TIP)
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
(CPA 2014)
Public Notification Process
Advance Agenda
Council Comments
City Manager Comments
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Discussion /Information
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council always reserves the
right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council, the
Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate,
discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative decision.
NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City
Clerk at (509) 921 -1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Study Session Agenda, April 15, 2014
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014 Department Director Approval ❑
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Legislative Agenda Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND:
Lobbyist Briahna Taylor will brief Council tonight on current and pending legislative issues.
OPTIONS:
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION:
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT:
ATTACHMENTS
Spokane Valley's 2013 -2014 Legislative Agenda
AWC 2014 Legislative Priorities
Spokane
,••OUa11ey
2013 -14 Amended Legislative Agenda
The following is the City of Spokane Valley's 2013 -2014 legislative agenda, adopted by Council at their December 18, 2012
Council meeting, and amended by Council Consensus at their December 10, 2013 meeting:
Appleway Trail Project
Seek $2,000,000 in funding in the 2015 -2017 Capital Budget for the development of Phase II of the former Milwaukie Railroad
right -of -way as a unique, two -mile green space and trail in the heart of Spokane Valley's commercial district. The project is
expected to increase use of the commercial corridor, benefitting the economy and creating new jobs. The project will provide a
much needed route for non - motorized travel along Spokane Valley's principle east -west commercial arterial, connecting the
Spokane Transit Authority Transit Center, business districts, schools, and medium -high density housing. Community members
have been actively involved in development of a Conceptual Design for the project, which includes: a paved trail, plazas, play
spaces and gathering places, public art, perennial gardens, space for community gardens, mountain bike trail, and lighting and
safety crossings. The current cost estimate for the two -mile portion of Phase II of the Appleway Trail Project (University to
Evergreen) is $2,692,320. Spokane Valley has received grant funding in the amount of $642,852 from Spokane Regional
Transportation Council in their last Call for Projects. The design drawings are 90% complete.
In 2008, the City constructed Phase I which included 1.2 miles of pathway from Corbin Road to the east City limits. If
successful in this funding request, the City would construct Phase II as described above. Phase III would consist of two miles
of trail from Evergreen Road to Corbin Road. The total funds required to complete Phase II and Phase III are estimated at
$5,286,000.
Protect the Local -State Shared Revenues
The City of Spokane Valley encourages the state to preserve local state - shared revenues, and restore funding to those accounts
revised and reduced during the last legislative session. These funds include the Liquor Excise Tax Account, Liquor Board
Profits, Streamlined Sales Tax Mitigation, Municipal Criminal Justice Assistance Account, and City- County Assistance
Account. In 2013, the Legislature permanently reduced local Liquor Excise Tax distributions to cities. In Spokane Valley, this
resulted in approximately a 75% reduction ($437,486 in 2011 to $108,900 in 2014). The Legislature also capped the local
government share of Liquor Board Profits at a fixed rate. The City supports restoring shared Liquor Excise Tax revenues;
restoring growth in local Liquor Board Profits so that cities can share in the increasing liquor revenues; and, protecting and
maintaining funding to other state -share revenue accounts. The City also requests consideration for receiving shared revenues
in any and all new state programs where the City would have operating, enforcement, or financial obligations associated with
the activities of these new programs.
Additional Lien Authority to Recoup Code Enforcement Costs
The City of Spokane Valley seeks legislation to provide cities with additional tools to recoup costs for enforcing code
compliance when a court order has been issued and a city performs the abatement itself or through a contractor. The legislation
would provide cities with the same authority that counties currently have to impose a priority lien on the property, and would
also authorize cities to collect such liens on the following year's property tax assessment.
Long -Range Legislative Agenda Item
Transportation Project — Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation
The City of Spokane Valley supports identifying future funding opportunities for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation
project. As the state experiences an increase in rail traffic, this particular intersection will become increasingly congested and
dangerous. This project will separate vehicle traffic from train traffic and remove the at -grade rail crossing. The total anticipated
cost is $26 million. The City has secured $5 2 million from the Washington State Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Board
and the project has been identified as regionally significant by the Inland Pacific Hub Study. Long -term, the City is seeking
$2 lmillion in future funding for the Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation. Additional benefits include: Improve the Level of
Service (LOS) of `F' at this intersection, allowing for new development in the industrial -zoned portion of the City; improve
emergency access; and help to address concerns about coal trains, including impeded traffic flow, increased whistle noise, and
train- vehicle conflict safety.
The City supports the Association of Washington Cities' legislative agenda items that serve the best interests of Spokane
Valley.
1A
ASSOCIATION
OF WASHINGTON
CiTiES
Take Action for Cities 2014 Agenda
The key to a great state is strong cities throughout Washington. Our 281 cities
are the state's economic engines and where most of the population lives, works, shops and plays.
In 2014, legislators can protect the heart of a great state by taking action to:
' • Restore liquor revenue sharing - The long history of
local /state liquor revenue sharing, a partnership dating 70+ years, has been severely
undermined in recent years. The Legislature must restore the growth in profits that
■ cities need to fund public safety and other local impacts. Support HB 2314/SB 6361 -
incrementally restores growth in local liquor profits.
MAIN STREET
1
xl
January 2014
• Fund new city responsibilities from marijuana
legalization - The new marijuana industry is subject to up to a 75% state
excise tax, but none of that funding is directed to local jurisdictions to address public
safety needs and other complex local impacts. Reconcile medical and recreational
marijuana to meet the federal mandate for a tightly - regulated system.
Support HB 2149 - reconciles medical /recreational marijuana.
SSB 5887 - reconcile medical /recreational marijuana and provide funding for cities.
• Fund transportation needs, including
providing new local transportation revenue
options - Transportation is critical for our economic vitality. Cities must have
the resources to maintain and strengthen both local and state transportation systems.
Support SHB 1959, HB 1892 and SHB 1953 - local transportation revenue options.
• Stop raiding infrastructure fu. - Ourinfrastructure
is aging and cities can't keep up with increasing demands. If we are going to
keep Washington moving forward, we need the Public Works Trust Fund and other
infrastructure programs intact, to allow for planned and sustained investments in
communities. Support SHB 2244 - restores funding for the Public Works Trust Fund.
Contact: Dave Williams • Director of Government Relations • davew@awcnet.org
Association of Washington Cities • 1
176 Franklin St SE, Olympia, WA 98501 • awcnet.org
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft 2015 — 2020 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
(TIP) Discussion of Potential Projects
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced six -year plans for
coordinated transportation program expenditures.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adopted 2014 -2019 Six Year TIP last year on June
11, 2013, Resolution #13 -006.
BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after a public hearing,
adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six
calendar years. This plan must be adopted by June 30th and submitted to the Washington State
Department of Transportation before July 31St of each year.
To better incorporate City Council priorities in identifying projects for the 2015 -2020 TIP, Staff
would like to discuss projects carried over from last year's TIP, the unfunded projects list, and
any potential projects to add or remove for the proposed 2015 -2020 TIP update.
The attached list represents projects from last year's Six Year TIP. Completed projects have
been removed and recently funded projects have been added. This becomes a starting point
for developing the 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP. Based on comments received, staff will prepare a
first draft of the Six Year TIP reflecting Council's goals and priorities.
Added Projects:
1. Barker Rd Improvement Project, Appleway to 1 -90
2. Sprague /Long Sidewalk Project — Funding Received from CDBG
3. Sprague /Barker Roundabout — Beginning design with Developer funds.
Rescheduled Projects:
1. Barker /BNSF Grade Separation — Moved up to accommodate TIGER 6 grant obligation
deadline.
2. Fancher /BNSF RR Overpass Bridge Joint Repair Project — CN delayed to 2015 from
2014 to take advantage of BR grant opportunity.
3. Broadway /Argonne /Mullan Concrete Intersection — Delayed to align with potential
STP funding availability.
4. Mission Ave Improvement — Flora to Barker (CN) - Delayed to align with potential
STP funding availability.
5. Appleway Trail Phase 3 — Evergreen to Corbin - Delayed to align with funding
opportunities.
6. Appleway Trail Phase 4 — University to Park/Library Site - Delayed to align with
funding opportunities.
7. Barker Rd Improvement — Spokane River to Euclid — Delayed to align with future
funding opportunities.
8. Park Road #2 Improvement — Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) - Delayed to align with
future funding opportunities.
OPTIONS: Discuss potential TIP projects and project schedules.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Provide discussion and feedback.
BUDGET /FINANCIAL IMPACTS: As the proposed 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP evolves, staff will
coordinate with the Finance Department regarding the city's ability to meet local match grant
requirements for future state and federal grants.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, P.E. - Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Eric Guth, P.E. - Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Proposed TIP Projects List
2) Projects List with no Current Funding
3) Total Project Cost Report
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
1 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade- 190 to Trent
S
0.38 0 0 631 630 City 253 253
CMAQ 377 377
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB Right Turn Lane at Montgomery, Intersection Improvements at Knox
Funding Secured (SRTC 06 -31), City Project #0060
Project Total 630 630
2 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - Felts Field to 6.5 738 0 0 737 City
s Evergreen Rd (PE) STP(E) 372 365 737
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
PE Funded; SRTC #TE10 -04; City Project #0145
Project Total 372 365 737
3 Sullivan Road West Bridge
S
Reconstruct and widen west (southbound) bridge
Recv'd FMSIB, BR & TIB grants; City Project #0155
0.08 0 0 8,440 8,440 BR 2,852 2,852
City 893 893
FMSIB 1,000 1,000
Other 1,945 1,945
Fed
UCP 1,750 1,750
Project Total 8,440 8,440
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 1
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
4 Citywide Safety Improvements o 0 0 31 31 City
S Other 21 21
Fed
Other 10 10
Fed
Signal, pedestrian, bike & sign retrofit safety improvements
HSIP & QRSP funded; City Project #0167
Project Total 31 31
5 Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3
P
Complete gaps in sidewalk system throughout City, ADA upgrades
0 28 25 515 568 City 7 70 77
CMAQ 46 445 491
Project Total 53 515 568
6 Sprague / Barker Roundabout 0 0 12 422 434 City 12 422 434
S Develop
ers
Install Roundabout
PE funded with Developer fees
Project Total 12 422 434
7 ITS Infill Project 0 0 0 301 301 City 41 41
S CMAQ 260 260
Installs Fiber along University (4th to 16th), Fancher (Sprague to Broadway) and Broadway (Fancher to Park)
CMAQ Funded, City #0201
Project Total 301 301
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 2
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
8 Sprague / Long Sidewalk Project
S
0.2 0 0 236 236 City
CDBG 236 236
Construct new sidwalk along south side of Sprague (Appleway to Arties Ln) and east side of Long (Sprague to school)
CDBG Funded
Project Total 236 236
9 2015 Street Preservation Project
P
0.26 50 0 1,950 2,000 City 2,000 2,000
Dishman -Mica Resurface - Sands to Thorpe; Euclid Ave Recon - West end of City to Sullivan; Flora Rd Recon - Euclid
to Trent; Madison Rd Recon - 40th to Thorpe; Mission Ave Resurface - Argonne to Herald; Mullen Rd Resurface -
Broadway to Mission
Project Total 2,000 2,000
10 Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation 0 2,000 1,679 24,800 28,481 City 225 597 1,304 783 2,909
P Other 180 540 720
Fed
UCP 1,419 1,255 496 298 3,468
Construct Grade Separation at Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290) Other- 96 336 620 372 1,424
RR
Other 3,000 7,500 4,500 15,000
Fed
FY09 Federal Earmark for $720K million, 20% of CN (up to $10M) received from FMSIB FMSIB 992 2,480 1,488 4,960
Project Total 1,920 6,720 12,400 7,441 28,481
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 3
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
11 Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th
P
Construct sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish
0.25 64 65 472 601 City 14 68 82
SRTS 83 436 519
Project Total 97 504 601
12 Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Sinto Ave. to 0.44 15 25 416 456 City 5 56 61
p Indiana Ave. SRTS 35 360 395
Construct sidewalk along east side of Park Road from 200 -ft S. of Sinto to Indiana Ave. and 165 -ft gap on Mission Ave.
east of Park Rd
Project Total 40 416 456
13 Sullivan Corridor ITS - 1 -90 to Trent (SR 290) 1.75 105 0 809 914 City 14 109 123
S CMAQ 91 700 791
Extend ITS conduit and contols along Sullivan Corridor
CMAQ funded, City #
Project Total 105 809 914
14 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Broadway to
s Mission
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.49
STP Funded
0.17 30 0 0 30 City 4
STP(U) 26
4
26
Project Total 30 30
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 4
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
15 Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague to
s Broadway
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.2
STP Funded
0.5 52 0 788 840 City 113 113
STP(U) 727 727
Project Total 840 840
16 Fancher /BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair
p Project
Repair bridge joints on RR overpass
0 29 0 172 200 City
BR 200 200
Project Total 200 200
17 2016 Street Preservation Project
P
0 50 0 1,950 2,000 City 2,000 2,000
Appleway Blvd Resurface -Vista to Dishman -Mica; Dishman -Mica Rd Resurface - Thorpe to S City limits; Euclid Ave
Recon - Sullivan to Marietta; Farr Rd Recon -4th to 8th; Progress Rd Recon - Wellesley to Crown
Project Total
2,000 2,000
18 2017 Street Preservation Project
P
0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City 1,400 1,400
Euclid Ave Recon- Marietta to Flora; Evergreen Rd Resurface -190 to Indiana; Farr Rd Recon - Appleway to 4th; Sprague
Ave Resurface -Flora to Corbin; Sprague Ave Resurface -Park to Vista; Sprague Ave Resurface - Sullivan to Conklin
Project Total
1,400 1,400
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 5
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
19 Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan Concrete
p Intersections (CN Only)
Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement
0
0 0 2,110 2,110 City 285 285
STP(U) 1,825 1,825
Project Total
2,110 2,110
20 Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW /CN)
P
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
0
0 0 1,562 1,562 City
STP(U)
211
1,351
211
1,351
Project Total
1,562 1,562
21 2018 Street Preservation Project
P
Appleway(Park to Dishman- Mica); Argonne(Broadway to Indiana)
0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City 1,400 1,400
Project Total
1,400 1,400
22 Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen to Corbin 2.35 214 0 2,860 3,074 City 29 386 415
p CMAQ 185 2,474 2,659
Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right -of -Way
Project Total
214 2,860 3,074
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 6
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
23 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement - 1 -90 to
p Montgomery
Reconstruct pavement in concrete; OCI: 40.35 (2012)
0.25 359 0 2,749 3,108 City 48 371 419
STP(U) 311 2,378 2,689
Project Total
359 2,749 3,108
24 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN)
P
Widen & Overlay with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities
1
0 0 3,416 3,416 City
UAP
683
2,733
683
2,733
Project Total
3,416 3,416
25 Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - Felts Field to 6.5 0 100 4,280 4,380 City 14 289 289 592
p Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) STP(E) 86 1,851 1,851 3,788
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
Project Total 100 2,140 2,140 4,380
26 2019 Street Preservation Project
P
Sullivan (Trent to Wellesley); Evergreen (Mission Connector to Indiana)
0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City 1,400 1,400
Project Total
1,400 1,400
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 7
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
27 Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Rd. to
p Balfour Park
Extend Shared Use pathway to Balfour Park
0.5 100 400 700 1,200 City 68 94 162
TA 432 606 1,038
Project Total
500 700 1,200
28 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to I-
p 90
0.28 257 850 1,968 3,075 City
STP(U)
Widen and improve to 5 -lane urban section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway
150 266 416
957 1,702 2,659
Project Total
1,107 1,968 3,075
29 Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of Trent Ave
p (SR290)
Reconstruct Barker to 3 -lane urban section
0.75 471 100 0 571 City
UAP
114 114
457 457
Project Total
30 Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane
p River to Euclid
Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane urban section
0.53 378 25 0 403 City
UAP
571 571
81 81
322 322
Project Total
403 403
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 8
Spokane
Valley
Project / Description / Current Status
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Length PE RW CN Total
Funding
Sources
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Total
31 Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to
p Barker
0 543 1,000 0 1,543 City 309 309
UAP 1,234 1,234
Extend Broadway arterial to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker
Project Total 1,543 1,543
32 Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana (RW & CN) 0.75 0 150 2,877 3,027 City 20 388 408
P STP(U) 130 2,489 2,619
Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities
Project Total
150 2,877 3,027
33 2020 Street Preservation Project
P
0 30 0 1,370 1,400 City 1,400 1,400
Project Total 1,400 1,400
Totals: 5,603 4,431 69,935 79,969 15,307 11,751 17,472 13,080 13,633 8,725 79,968
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 9
Spokane
Valley
Draft 2015 - 2020
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals
Secured Projects
Planned Projects
Totals
Year Federal State Other City Total Farlaral State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total
2015 $6,917 $2,750 $0 $1,330 $10,997 $544 $1,419 $96 $2,251 $4,310 $7,461 $4,169 $96 $3,581 $15,307
2016 $1,065 $0 $0 $531 $1,596 $4,781 $2,247 $336 $2,791 $10,155 $5,846 $2,247 $336 $3,322 $11,751
2017 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,676 $2,976 $620 $3,200 $17,472 $10,676 $2,976 $620 $3,200 $17,472
2018 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,082 $4,519 $372 $2,957 $12,930 $5,082 $4,519 $372 $2,957 $12,930
2019 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,092 $0 $0 $2,664 $10,756 $8,092 $0 $0 $2,664 $10,756
2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,289 $2,013 $0 $2,573 $8,875 $4,289 $2,013 $0 $2,573 $8,875
Total $7,982 $2,750 $0 $1,861 $12,593 $33,464 $13,17 $1,424 $16,436 $64,498 $41,446 $15,924 $1,424 $18,297 $77,091
4
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, any
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
4/7/2014 Page 1
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name
Bowdish Road - 16th to Sprague
Bowdish Road - 24th to 16th
Bowdish Road - 32nd to 24th
Bowdish Sidewalk - 12th to 16th
Greenacres Trail - Sullivan to E City
Limits (RW &CN)
Park Road #2 Sidewalk Project -
Marietta Ave. to Buckeye Ave.
Park Road / BNSF Grade Separation
Pavement Management Program -
Local Access
Pines Corridor ITS - Sprague to 16th
Pines Rd / BNSF Grade Separation
Saltese /Sullivan Traffic Signal
Sprague / Argonne- Mullan Concrete
Intersections
Sprague / Fancher Concrete
Intersection
Sprague / Thierman Concrete
Intersection
Sprague / University Concrete
Intersection
Sullivan / Kiernan Concrete
Intersection
Sullivan / Marietta Concrete
Intersection
Sullivan Rd / BNSF Grade
Separation Improvements
Sullivan Road North Extension
(Bigelow Gulch)
Description
Sprague to 8th: Inlay & Enhancement; 8th to
16th: Reconstruct as 2 -lane section w/ curb,
sidewalk, bike lanes and new stormwater facilities
Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb,
sidewalk and new stormwater facilities;
Reconstruct Roadway as 2 -lane section w/ curb,
sidewalk and new stormwater facilities;
Construct Sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish
Construct Shared Use Pathway on abandoned
railroad right -of -way
Construct sidewalk along one side of Park Road
and 160 -ft gap on north side of Buckeye Ave east
of Park Road
Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of
Park Road and the BNSF railroad tracks.
Annual street preservation projects
Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor
Construct grade separation at Pines Rd (SR -27) /
Trent Ave (SR 290) / BNSF RR
Improvements to Intersection, Install Traffic
Signal (In coordination w/ Spokane County)
Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement.
Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement
Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement
Upgrade and widen grade separation at
Sullivan /BNSF /Trent (SR290)
Reconstruct and widen the Sullivan Road
extension north also known as Bigelow Gulch
Road to a 4 -lane roadway with 8 -foot shoulders
and a 12 -foot two way left turn lane.
Total Cost
$2,858
$2,846
$2,637
$557
$1,095
$143
$16,520
$11,664
$785
$45,000
$586
$2,342
$1,572
$1,243
$1,660
$1,423
$1,493
$45,000
$55
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 1 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Six Year Transportation Improvement Program
Projects w/ No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name Description Total Cost
Wellesley Realignment @ Realign connection of Wellesley to Barker Rd and $5,187
Barker /SR290 SR290, 3 -lane section, Part of Barker /BNSF
Grade Separation
Totals: $144,666
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 2 of 2
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Project Name
2020 Street Preservation Project
Description
Total:
Arterial Improvements
Project Name
Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker
Rd. (CN)
Barker Rd Improvement Project -
Appleway to 1 -90
Barker Rd - Euclid to 0.1 mi. S. of
Trent Ave (SR290)
Barker Rd Improvement Project -
Spokane River to Euclid
Broadway Improvement Project -
Flora to Barker
Park Road #2 - Broadway to Indiana
(RW & CN)
Description
Widen & Overlay with curb,
sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities
Widen and improve to 5 -lane urban
section, Roundabout @ Broadway,
Realign east leg of Broadway
Reconstruct Barker to 3 -lane urban
section
Reconstruct and widen to 3 -lane
urban section
Extend Broadway arterial to Barker
Rd, Realign Broadway connection
east of Barker
Reconstruct to a 3 -lane section with
curb, sidewalks, bike lanes and
stormwater facilities
Total:
City Cost Total Cost
$1,400 $1,400
$1,400 $1,400
City Cost Total Cost
$683 $3,416
$416 $3,075
$837 $4,184
$661 $3,302
$1,142 $5,706
$418 $3,102
$4,157 $22,785
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 1 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Bridge Projects
Project Name
Sullivan Road West Bridge
Barker Road / BNSF Grade
Separation
Fancher /BNSF RR Overpass Joint
Repair Project
Description
Reconstruct and widen west
(southbound) bridge
Construct Grade Separation at
Barker /BNSF RR/ Trent (SR290)
Repair bridge joints on RR overpass
Total:
Congestion Improvements
Project Name
Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade- 190 to
Trent
Sprague / Barker Roundabout
Description
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB
Right Turn Lane at Montgomery,
Intersection Improvements at Knox
Install Roundabout
Total:
City Cost Total Cost
$2,360 $19,750
$2,909 $28,479
$0 $201
$5,269 $48,430
City Cost Total Cost
$434 $1,550
$434 $489
$868 $2,039
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 2 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Pedestrian /Bicycle Program
Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - Felts Construct Shared Use Pathway on $0 $745
Field to Evergreen Rd (PE) abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
Sidewalk Infill Program - Phase 3 Complete gaps in sidewalk system $88 $655
throughout City, ADA upgrades
Sprague / Long Sidewalk Project Construct new sidwalk along south $13 $283
side of Sprague (Appleway to Arties
Ln) and east side of Long (Sprague
to school)
Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th Construct sidewalk along both sides $82 $601
of Bowdish
Park Road #1 Sidewalk Project - Construct sidewalk along east side of $61 $456
Sinto Ave. to Indiana Ave. Park Road from 200 -ft S. of Sinto to
Indiana Ave. and 165 -ft gap on
Mission Ave. east of Park Rd
Appleway Trail Phase 3 - Evergreen Construct Shared Use Pathway $415 $3,074
to Corbin along abandoned Railroad Right -of-
Way
Spokane Valley- Millwood Trail - Felts Construct Shared Use Pathway on $592 $4,380
Field to Evergreen Rd (RW &CN) abandoned Railroad Right -of -way
Appleway Trail Phase 4 - University Extend Shared Use pathway to $162 $1,200
Rd. to Balfour Park Balfour Park
Total: $1,413 $11,394
Safety Program
Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost
Citywide Safety Improvements Signal, pedestrian, bike & sign $0 $674
retrofit safety improvements
Total: $0 $674
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 3 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Street Preservation Projects
Project Name Description
2015 Street Preservation Project Dishman -Mica Resurface - Sands to
Thorpe; Euclid Ave Recon - West
end of City to Sullivan; Flora Rd
Recon - Euclid to Trent; Madison Rd
Recon - 40th to Thorpe; Mission Ave
Resurface - Argonne to Herald;
Mullen Rd Resurface - Broadway to
Mission
Sullivan Road Resurfacing -
Broadway to Mission
Sullivan Road Resurfacing - Sprague
to Broadway
2016 Street Preservation Project
2017 Street Preservation Project
2018 Street Preservation Project
2019 Street Preservation Project
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 32.49
Grind /Overlay; OCI: 31.2
Appleway Blvd Resurface -Vista to
Dishman -Mica; Dishman -Mica Rd
Resurface - Thorpe to S City limits;
Euclid Ave Recon - Sullivan to
Marietta; Farr Rd Recon -4th to 8th;
Progress Rd Recon - Wellesley to
Crown
Euclid Ave Recon- Marietta to Flora;
Evergreen Rd Resurface -190 to
Indiana; Farr Rd Recon - Appleway to
4th; Sprague Ave Resurface -Flora to
Corbin; Sprague Ave Resurface -Park
to Vista; Sprague Ave Resurface -
Sullivan to Conklin
Appleway(Park to Dishman- Mica);
Argonne(Broadway to Indiana)
Sullivan (Trent to Wellesley);
Evergreen (Mission Connector to
Indiana)
Total:
City Cost Total Cost
$2,000
$43
$113
$2,000
$1,400
$1,400
$1,400
$8,356
$2,000
$316
$840
$2,000
$1,400
$1,400
$1,400
$9,356
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 4 of 5
City of Spokane Valley
Department of Public Works
Total Project Costs
(Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP)
Projects Listed by Category for the 2014- 2019Six -Year TIP
Dollars in Thousands
Street Reconstruction Projects
Project Name
Broadway @ Argonne /Mullan
Concrete Intersections (CN Only)
Sullivan / Euclid Concrete
Intersection (RW /CN)
Argonne Road Concrete Pavement -
1 -90 to Montgomery
Description
Reconstruct intersections in concrete
pavement
Reconstruct intersection in concrete
pavement
Reconstruct pavement in concrete;
OCI: 40.35 (2012)
Total:
Traffic Operations and Maintenance
Project Name
ITS InfiII Project
Sullivan Corridor ITS - 1 -90 to Trent
(SR 290)
Description
Installs Fiber along University (4th to
16th), Fancher (Sprague to
Broadway) and Broadway (Fancher
to Park)
Extend ITS conduit and contols
along Sullivan Corridor
Total:
Overall Total:
City Cost Total Cost
$285 $2,110
$211 $1,562
$419 $3,108
$915 $6,780
City Cost Total Cost
$45 $327
$123 $914
$168 $1,241
$22,546 $104,099
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not
intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
Monday, April 07, 2014 Page 5 of 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014 Department Director Approval El
Item: Check all that apply:
❑ consent
❑ information
❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed 2014 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments -
Overview
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, SVMC 17.80.140 and 19.30.010
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND:
Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 17.80.140 establishes an annual comprehensive plan
amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1st of the following year. The
Planning Commission considers applications during the following spring, with a decision by City
Council generally occurring in late spring/early summer.
The Community Development Department received two privately initiated requests for site -
specific Comprehensive Plan amendments. In addition, the City is proposing one site - specific
Comprehensive Plan amendment. Sites approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment receive
a zoning classification consistent with the new land use designation.
The Comprehensive Plan text amendments include amendments to six Comprehensive Plan
Elements: Chapter 2 - Land Use, Chapter 3 — Transportation, Chapter 4 — Capital Facilities and
Public Services, Chapter 6 — Private and Public Utilities, Chapter 7 — Economic Development, and
Chapter 11 - Bike and Pedestrian. The proposed amendments may also entail minor changes to
other elements referencing the proposed amendments.
Staff presented the proposed amendments to the Planning Commission at a study session on
February 13, 2014. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the amendments on
February 27, 2014 and continued the hearing to the March 13th meeting. Following deliberations,
the Planning Commission took the following actions:
CPA 01 -14 (Mirabeau Park) — voted to recommend that Council deny the specific map
amendment;
CPA 02 -14 (SCRAPS - Bradley Road) — voted to recommend that Council deny resulted in a
tie, as a result the motion failed. This is being forwarded without a recommendation;
CPA 03 -14 (Barker and Sprague) — voted to recommend that Council deny the specific map
amendment;
CPA 04 -14 through CPA 08 -14 — voted to recommend approval of the text amendments;
CPA 09 -14 — text amendment regarding parks and recreation: withdrawn by staff; and
CPA 10 -14: voted to recommend approval of the text amendment.
1 of 2
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on
February 7, 2014 and each site was posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, which
described the proposal. Individual notices of the proposals were mailed to all property owners
within 400 feet of each proposed amendment.
SEPA REVIEW:
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — chapter 43.21C RCW), environmental
checklists were required for each proposed amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to a
comprehensive plan are considered "non - project actions" defined as actions involving decisions
on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the
environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the physical development of
the subject properties.
Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. Determinations of Non - significance (DNS) were
issued for the proposed amendments on February 7, 2014 consistent with SVMC 21.20.070.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS:
Proposed amendments to the Comprehensive plan are organized into individual reports
consisting of staff reports, maps, and comments submitted to date to assist the City Council in its
review.
OPTIONS: Consensus to proceed with process, including holding a public hearing at the May 6
Council meeting.
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1) PowerPoint Presentation
2) Written Comments from Pinecroft Business Park —dated March 31, 2014
3) See separate yellow notebook: contents include 2014 Comprehensive Plan
amendments with individual Staff Reports, Planning Commission Meeting
minutes, and comments received.
Please note that the yellow notebooks will be used throughout this entire process,
and at the end of the process they should be returned to Community Development
for use in subsequent year's Comprehensive Plan amendments.
2 of 2
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
April 15, 2014
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
1
Comprehensive Planning
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP)
is the City's guide for growth and development.
• Residential
• Industrial
• Commercial
• Office
• Recreation
1
Land Use
Infrastructure
• Roads
• Sewer
• Water
• Utilities
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
• Buildings
• Services
• Financing
Capital
Facilities
J
SVCP Amendment Process
• City Council approves official docket
• November 1st cut off for applications (60 -day notice)
• Planning Commission recommendation
• City Council approval
• Growth Management Hearing Board
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
3
City - Initiated Map Amendment
Project Number
Applicant:
Application
Description
City of Spokane Valley
11707 East Sprague Ave, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Change City -owned parcel 45101.9068 from Parks /Open
Space to Mixed Use Center
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
1 CPA -01 -14
SPOKANE VA LE
• G faCPLAI
IL
v
_L I
Buckeye`_A
�_marie Yta -AV
✓
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
5
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
6
45101 9068
S P DJ{ A
NI era l:.e.L .I..,::.5• 11.
45101:9095
Centennial Tru r'<irl ;iii. Lind
'] ::ills v.J
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
Comprehensive Land Use Designations
al
M1llsed Use Center
I CPA-01-14
SPOKANE VA
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
9
r
Zoning Designations
0
1
4
1
1
1
1
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
10
PLANNING
land
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Map
■ i ■ •►l.0
Lacrosse!
m
1 Par
steal Park E
Bach.
Knox
- Indian •,
Located in Urban Natural Open Space
Mission
Maxwe
10
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
11
Issues Discussed at Public Hearing
• Open space = valuable asset
• Irregular lot size and shoreline setbacks create
development challenges
• Potential Centennial Trail and view impacts
PC Recommendation
• Motion to forward CPA -01 -14 to City
Council with a recommendation to
deny
• Motion passed 5 -1
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
Applicant:
Application Description
Spokane County Regional Animal
Protection Services (SCRAPS)
2521 North Flora Road
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
Change parcel 35124.0813 from Low Density
Residential to Corridor Mixed Use
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
CPA -02-14
r u R x 11 L
I I I ' Ifn
Carlis e Av,
Q
t-� Mansfield Av— Mansfield u l
i+
• .l. 16 A is
• ■� JJ J:1 Knox -AVM a
_r
a
a Id win=Av
Carlisle-Ay
n=7= 4,1
ontgomeny =Av
0-0
so
MI
h a OM
i
o.
Ep
IP
711 Nig
a -r
a
} Ba
hau▪ l onA
a
�ndiana Av NOM
n-
a-
ana.4 6
dS ld IniAv
l
PO ANE AL
14Ln
ro rb
Augusta
M ISSI On7--Av
OR
MIS
M a xweil'Av
,1ntoS .AV
apt
IINIINI
.B' ne Av4
11 iii•
Y
Sh- arp_Av�r
AV
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
a
15
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
16
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
Itr
r-I
ir4
rm.
v
l.o;v Density Residential
mprehen -give Plan Land Use Designations
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
AI
18
R -2
1Amendment Site L
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
o
0.
19
Issues Discussed at Public Hearing
• Allows high density development to encroach
into Low Density Residential zone
• Inconsistent with neighborhood character
• Vacant property serves as buffer
• Regional facility — community need
PC Recommendation
• Motion to forward CPA -02 -14 to City
Council with a recommendation to
deny
• Motion Tied 3 -3
• Forwarded with no recommendation
Privately Initiated Map Amendment
Applicant(s):
Property Owner(s):
Application Description
a
Whipple Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Teresa and Wendell Olsen
1
Change parcel 55173.1005 from Low Density
Residential Designation to High Density
Residential Designation
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
22
Dea-let Av
LC aid° Av
taldo-Av
\<")-1-Cataldo.7-Av
Broadway
Broad Wa
55172.0421
55173:3701
55171.1302 _
5.51.15 9049
E_Ft--PY-1.7KK-E
55174.9035
Springfield -A
liluui
a
55174.9007
0
0
0
0
4-4
0
0
Cr)
! ktt 11.1
_
P 97K_A-N-E 11.111. E-
111 gim
im
v-54 012
Mee nd AV
c110filllf.thl-A7nr:
LI:3rd Av
o
an.
4th Av
k
6th-Av-
Igth Av
-- 5th Av 1
-1_
in
. ol
55192.9063
0 0
1St
C4 7,
O.
t%)
Micaview Dr
-L-st."-- •
I rp
6Ch
1
WXPTPI+FREIrl
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
8th
AvA-7
0-
23
Riverside Av
q..
Sprague Av
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
24
Looking north
Looking west from Barker
1
Looking south
Looking west from Nixon
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
2'
55184 3r;L 5518.4.'.102
r` I i ' i 1--
va14e [ ay Ct I
CPA -03 -14
11-1 -r
ji
�Comprehensi PIa�
rn
0
0
2
X5173 1a1B
r-
0
0)
L
r-
J
Lana Usel
55191.0531
55173.1005
prague —
Av
c� �„ I
rJ'j I 8 I 0
Q 0
0
1
Sk.
N
0 0
IIgi
vroposea LU14 Lomprenenslve
Plan Amendments
signa
01
nJ
01
0
01
VI
i 1 UK
N
O O
h ▪ I II
01
0
•
0
26
mbar CI.
v al; ertay c
CPA -03 -14
::07
9025
55173 101B
55173.1005
41 01
8600o
� f�iv�rsi
-r.
Zoning District Desi.:natns
J
J N I r
h]
:
3 V
Proposed LU14 compIrenenslve
Plan Amendments
J1
Q
4
0
6
5
cri
h1
Issues Discussed at Public Hearing
• Impacts: Increased traffic, noise, potentially
crime, overcrowded schools
• Create an island of LDR property
• Demand for single family housing — conversion of
underutilized lot is consistent with the Comp Plan
• Not consistent with the neighborhood character
• Too far from Appleway and commercial services
28
PC Recommendation
• Motion to forward CPA -03 -14 to City
Council with a recommendation to
deny
• Motion passed unanimously
nitiated Text Amendments
• Update land capacity analysis and growth projections
• Current /20 yr. estimated pop = 91,940/106,831
• Land Capacity = 14,891 persons
• Add Goal and policies to support infill development in
Residential zones
• Remove City Center land use scenario, land use
designation, and all associated goals and policies
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA -04 -14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
• Remove City Center section
• Update Map 3.1 Arterial
Street Plan
...i
..
City - Initiated Text Amendments
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA -05 -14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
31
City - Initiated Text Amendments
1 CPA -06 -14
Capital Facilities
• Update six -year Transportation
Improvement Program
• Update City capital projects to reflect
Council policy direction and approved
financial plans
J
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA -06 -14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
32
City - Initiated Text Amendments
• Remove reference to City
Center Plan Concept
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA -07 -14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
33
• Remove reference to City Center
Plan Concept
• Update Development Activity Map
___
City - Initiated Text Amendments
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA -08 -14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
City - Initiated Text Amendments
C PA-09-
Parks and
Recreation
•Withdrawn by Staff
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
35
City - Initiated Text Amendments
C-PA1O-
.Bike&
Pedestrian
• Include 2012 bike and pedestrian
improvements
• Add proposed shared use path along Barker
PC Recommendation:
• Motion to forward CPA -10 -14 to City Council with a recommendation to
approve as presented
• Motion passed unanimously
Proposed 2014 Comprehensive
Plan Amendments
inecroft
BUSINESS PARK
March 31, 2014
Mayor Dean Grafos
Deputy Mayor Arne Woodward
Mr. Rod Higgins
Mr. Ed Pace
Mr. Charles "Chuck" Hafner
Mr. Ben Wick
Mr. Bill Bates
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Via Email: citycouncil@spokanevalley.org
Re: City of Spokane Valley 2014 Comprehensive Plan Amendment CPA -01 -14
Gentleman:
I write this letter to urge you to approve the City of Spokane Valley (COSV) staff initiated CPA -01 -14 change to the
comprehensive plan.
I am the property manager and leasing agent for the Pinecroft Business Park. Pinecroft owns the majority of the
land and the buildings adjacent to tax parcel 45101.9068 as shown on the attached site plan. Currently the Pinecroft
Business Park is home to approximately 350,000 square feet of office and flex - office /manufacturing /warehouse
space. At last count the 20+ businesses located at Pinecroft employ 1,200+ people. Vacancy is low and we are
working on several projects in the business park that will increase our size and employee count.
The three most common requests that I receive from my customers at Pinecroft include:
1. When will we have on -site food service?
2. When will a traffic light be installed at Pines & Mirabeau Parkway?
3. When will STA provide bus service through the business park?
Several entrepreneurs have looked at opening a food service business at Pinecroft. They have felt the best place to
open such a business would be at the east end of the Pinecroft Business Park so they can serve both Pinecroft but
also provide service to users of the Centennial Trail and patrons of Mirabeau Point Park. Pinecroft, LLC is
interested in obtaining tax parcel 45101.9068 so it can be developed to provide food service, community space and
parking for the area.
Please contact me with any questions.
Sincerely,
JMA COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, LLC
Property Manager/Leasing Agent for Pinecroft, LLC
Jamie M. Traeger, CCIM, CPM®
Cc: Mike Jackson — City of Spokane Valley
P'FNECCROP1 BUS ESS PARK
PINES AVENUE & MIRAia IEAU PARKWAY
PENT P.,NLIE
O F SPOKANE V A L L E Y , WA
Approve CPA -01 -14
Tax Parcel 461019008
[co
offioniuumoH mo
011111110111111110
0111111111111111110
N N A T U R A L A R E A
TO FREEWAY
DWCON, INC.
2609 E. PINEOROFT WAY SPOKANE. WA 99216
▪ (509) 468 -8900
▪ • AR=ECTJRA][, VENTURES
= == 0
9802E. MISSIONS AVENUE SPOKANE, WA 99206
C R T Y 100, C7PHIC SCALE
ROO
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: April 15, 2014 Department Director Approval Fl
Check all that apply: ❑ consent
❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Participation and Public Notice Requirements for
Comprehensive Plan Updates and Amendments
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A, RCW 36.70B, SVMC 17.80
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: N/A
BACKGROUND: City Council requested a review of the City's adopted Public Participation
Guidelines and notice requirements for Comprehensive Plan updates, Comprehensive Plan
annual amendments, and land use applications.
Comprehensive Plan Updates and Annual Amendments. RCW 36.70A.140 of the Growth
Management Act (GMA) requires local jurisdictions to "establish and broadly disseminate to the
public a public participation program...providing for early and continuous public participation in
the development of (and amendments to) comprehensive plans ". State law does not require
individual notice for comprehensive plan updates and annual amendments. The City adopted its
Public Participation Program in September, 2003, consistent with recommendations of the GMA
(see attached).
Land Use Applications (e.g., zone amendments). In 1995, the Washington State Legislature
adopted the Local Project Review Act (RCW 36.70B), which directs local jurisdictions to
streamline and integrate permit and environmental review processes. The law also established
maximum time limits for application review and comment. Specifically, the Local Project
Review Act requires the City to use "reasonable methods to give the notice of application to the
public...." In compliance with the provisions of RCW 36.70B, the City adopted Permit
Processing Procedures in SVMC 17.80, which include specific requirements for public notice,
depending on the permit type (see attached).
One key requirement of the Local Project Review Act is a Notice of Application for certain
permit types, such as subdivisions, variances, conditional uses, zone map amendments and
shoreline permits. The Notice of Application provides information on the project proposal, how
people can provide public comment and staff contact information. The Notice of Application is
sent to the applicant, all adjacent property owners, and all parties requesting notice.
Under SVMC 17.80, land use application permits that require a public hearing, such as
subdivisions and zone changes, require the following notice at least 15 days prior to the hearing:
1. Notice by mail to:
a. Property owners within 400 feet of subject property.
b. Agencies with jurisdiction (water, sewer, fire, etc.)
c. Entities which the City has executed an interlocal agreement.
1 of 2
d. Other persons affected by the proposal or who have requested notice.
2. Notice by sign posted on subject property.
3. Notice by publication in newspaper.
SVMC 17.80 further requires the City to follow the same notice procedures for Comprehensive
Plan annual amendments, except a Notice of Application is not required.
Text amendments to the SVMC are not site specific, so notice for public hearings are distributed
to the applicant (if privately initiated), the newspaper and posted at City Hall and the main
library branch.
OPTIONS: Discussion only.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, Planning Manager, Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Public Participation Guidelines
2. SVMC 17.80 — Permit Processing Procedures
3. 400' notice examples
2 of 2
SI�Is\lutk
jUalley
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Public Participation Program
RCW 36.70A.140 of the Washington Growth Management Act requires that each city "establish
and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program ... for early and continuous
public participation in the development" of the city's Comprehensive Plan.
Consistent with the recommendations of the GMA which emphasize the involvement of the
broadest cross - section of the community, including the involvement of groups not previously
involved, the City of Spokane Valley adopts the following program for citizen participation in the
planning process:
1. Visioning Process — This process provides Spokane Valley citizens an opportunity to
establish a framework and context upon which the comprehensive plan will be based.
Planning Commission meetings will provide the forum for the initial community visioning
process. A draft "Vision" will be tested for consistency during the development of the
Plan as the community identifies priorities and implementation strategies and updated
accordingly. The ultimate "Vision" will be established at the conclusion of the planning
process as a result of community participation.
2. Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will play a key role in establishing the
City's dialogue with community members, hosting a series of meetings and workshops
during the development of the Plan. The Planning Commission will evaluate information
provided by the community and develop recommendations for submission to the City
Council.
3. Citizen Survey — The City will conduct a statistically valid survey of the citizens of
Spokane Valley. Survey questions will address specific issues of the comprehensive
plan that will provide city staff, planning commission and city council with meaningful
input for development of the comprehensive plan.
4. Public Meetings. Conduct a series of public meetings hosted by the Planning
Commission on the preliminary draft comprehensive plan. This ensures that the City will
meet the requirement for "early and continuous" public participation in the
comprehensive planning process.
5. Public hearings. A series of Public Hearings (not less than three) will be held before the
Planning Commission to discuss the draft Plan. It is anticipated that at least two public
hearings will be held by the governing body prior to adoption of the Plan. An additional
public hearing will be held if substantive changes are made to the Plan document.
6. Public notice. The City will provide notice of all meetings and hearings pursuant to the
requirements of RCW 36.70A.020, .035, and .140.
8 -13 -2003
Adopted by Council 9 -23 -2003
7. Written Comment. The public will be invited to submit written comments as each
element of the Plan is developed, as part of any workshops or community meetings.
Comments will be specifically solicited from residents, special interest organizations and
business interests. Comments may be in the form of letters and other correspondence
to the city regarding the plan or comments received electronically on the city's website.
Log in all written comments received according to specific area of comprehensive plan.
8. Communications Programs & Informational Services — As staff and budgetary resources
allow, the activities will be undertaken to ensure broad -based citizen participation:
a. Comprehensive Plan newsletter — updating the community on planned meetings,
workshops or other significant comprehensive plan events. Articles on topics related to
the plan and a request for feedback from the community on topics related to the plan.
The newsletter will be disseminated via the city's website, emailed to a mailing list and /or
provided in paper copy as appropriate.
b. Interest Groups — Contact local interest groups (i.e. Chamber of Commerce, home
builders, environmental, neighborhoods, etc.) and arrange to meet and discuss relevant
comprehensive plan issues.
c. Community Workshops — Conduct community workshops hosted by the Planning
Commission in different parts of the city to encourage neighborhood participation in the
development of the comprehensive plan. These meetings will be held at neighborhood
schools, churches or other community facilities.
d. Press Releases & Public Service Announcements — Work with the local newspapers,
radio stations and televisions stations to advertise and promote significant events related
to the comprehensive plan.
e. Provide written articles to local media for publication.
f. Establish a Speaker's Bureau through the Planning Commission which will be
available to address service clubs and interested citizen groups.
g. Develop a database of interested citizens and provide regular correspondence
concerning the status of Plan development.
h. Identify key resource personnel representing agencies and groups whose plans will
be integrated into the Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to fire districts,
utilities, libraries and school districts.
i. Maintain a log of all public participation meetings, events and actions that the city
engages in to provide documentation on the city's effort to meet the requirements of the
GMA.
8 -13 -2003 2
Adopted by Council 9 -23 -2003
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
Chapter 17.80
PERMIT PROCESSING PROCEDURES
Sections:
17.80.010 Purpose and applicability.
17.80.020 Types of development applications.
17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification.
17.80.040 Exempt activities.
17.80.050 Development application requirements.
17.80.060 Final decision authority.
Required application procedures.
17.80.080 Pre - application conference.
17.80.090 Counter -complete determination.
17.80.100 Fully complete detemiination.
17.80.110 Notice of application.
17.80.120 Notice of public hearing.
17.80.130 Final decision.
Type IV applications — Comprehensive Plan amendments, development agreements
associated with a Comprehensive Plan amendment, and area -wide rezones.
17.80.150 Type IV applications — Text amendments to the uniform development code.
17.80.160 Optional consolidated review process.
CompileTitle
17.80.010 Purpose and applicability.
A. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to establish standardized decision - making procedures for
reviewing development and land use applications within the City. This chapter is intended to:
1. Assure prompt review of development applications;
2. Provide for necessary public review and comment on development applications;
3. Minimize adverse impacts on surrounding land uses;
4. Encourage flexibility and innovation in the design and layout of development proposals; and
5. Ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and development regulations.
B. Applicability. This chapter applies to all development applications identified in the SVMC. (Ord. 07-
015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.020 Types of development applications.
Land use and development applications will be classified as follows:
A. Type I procedures apply to permits and decisions issued administratively;
B. Type 11 procedures apply to administrative actions that contain some discretionary criteria;
httrd/ whw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 1/16
413/2014 Spolmne Valley Municipal Code
C. Type III procedures apply to quasi-judicial permits and actions that contain discretionary approval
criteria;
D. Type IV procedures apply to legislative matters. Legislative matters involve the creation, revision, or
large -scale implementation of public policy;
E. Exempt applications defined in SVMC 17.80.040. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification.
A. Assignment by Table. Land use and development applications shall be classified pursuant to the
following table:
Table 17.80 -1 — Permit Type and Land Use Application
Type
Land Use and Development Application
SVMC Cross - Reference
Type I
Accessory dwelling units
19.40.100
Administrative determinations by community development director,
public works director, or building official
Multiple
Administrative exception
19.140
Administrative interpretation
17.50.010
Boundary line adjustments and eliminations
20.80
Building permits not subject to SEPA
21.20.040
Floodplain development
21.30
Grading permits
24.50
Home occupation permit
19.40.140
Minor modifications of development agreements
19.30.015(1)
Record of survey to establish lots within a binding site plan
20.60.040
Right - of-way permits
22.130.100
Shoreline permit exemption (dock permit)
21.50
Site plan review
19.130
Temporary use permit
19.160
Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision or
binding site plan
20.30.060
Type 11
Alterations — Preliminary and final subdivisions, short subdivisions,
binding site plans
20.50
Binding site plan — Preliminary and final
20.50
Binding site plan — Change of conditions
20.50
SEPA threshold determination
21.20.060
Shoreline substantial development permit
21.50
Short subdivision — Preliminary and final
20.30, 20.40
httr.//www.codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevslIey.htrr
2/16
413/2014 Spolmne Valley Municipal Code
B. Assignment by Director. Land use and development applications not defined in SVMC Table 17.80 -1
shall be assigned a type by the director, unless exempt under SVMC 17.80.040. When one or more
procedure may be appropriate, the process providing the greatest opportunity for public notice shall be
followed. (Ord. 10 -004 § 1, 2010; Ord. 09 -033 § 1, 2009; Ord. 09 -010 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.040 Exempt activities.
A. Exemptions. Unless specified elsewhere in this title, the following development activities are exempt
from the procedural requirements of this chapter:
1. Normal or emergency repair or maintenance of public or private buildings, structures,
landscaping, or utilities.
2. A change of any legally established use is exempt; unless the change of use requires:
a. An increase in the number of parking spaces provided;
b. A conditional use permit under Chapter 19.150 SVMC;
c. A site plan approval under Chapter 19.130 SVMC; or
d. Review by SEPA.
3. Final subdivisions, short subdivisions, and binding site plans.
4. Building permits that are not subject to SEPA.
5. On -site utility permits not obtained in conjunction with a specific development application
including, but not limited to, sewer hook -ups, water hook -ups, right -of - -way permits, and fire
department permits.
6. Sign permits.
httpJMnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 3/16
Preliminary short subdivision, binding site plan — Change of conditions
20.30
Wireless communication facilities
22.120
Type III
Conditional use permits
19.150
Planned residential developments
19.50
Plat vacation
20.70.020
Preliminary subdivision — Change of conditions
20.50
Subdivisions — Preliminary
20.30
Variance
19.170
Zoning map amendments (site - specific rezones)
19.30.030
Type IV
Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments (text and/or map)
17.80.140
Area -wide zoning map amendments
17.80.140
Development agreements associated with Comprehensive Plan
amendments
17.80.140
Development code text amendments
17.80.150
B. Assignment by Director. Land use and development applications not defined in SVMC Table 17.80 -1
shall be assigned a type by the director, unless exempt under SVMC 17.80.040. When one or more
procedure may be appropriate, the process providing the greatest opportunity for public notice shall be
followed. (Ord. 10 -004 § 1, 2010; Ord. 09 -033 § 1, 2009; Ord. 09 -010 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.040 Exempt activities.
A. Exemptions. Unless specified elsewhere in this title, the following development activities are exempt
from the procedural requirements of this chapter:
1. Normal or emergency repair or maintenance of public or private buildings, structures,
landscaping, or utilities.
2. A change of any legally established use is exempt; unless the change of use requires:
a. An increase in the number of parking spaces provided;
b. A conditional use permit under Chapter 19.150 SVMC;
c. A site plan approval under Chapter 19.130 SVMC; or
d. Review by SEPA.
3. Final subdivisions, short subdivisions, and binding site plans.
4. Building permits that are not subject to SEPA.
5. On -site utility permits not obtained in conjunction with a specific development application
including, but not limited to, sewer hook -ups, water hook -ups, right -of - -way permits, and fire
department permits.
6. Sign permits.
httpJMnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 3/16
413/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
7. Interior remodeling and tenant improvements unless site plan review is required under Chapter
19.130 SVMC.
B. Other Regulations. Applications exempt under this section remain subject to all other applicable
standards and requirements of the SVMC. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.050 Development application requirements.
A. Application Forms. All applications shall be made on forms provided by the department. The director
shall have authority to modify application materials.
B. Submittal Information. All applications shall include the information required in applicable provisions
of this code as identified in SVMC Table 17.80 -2 and other additional information required by the
department.
C. Fees. Fees as required by Chapter 17.110 SVMC. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.060 Final decision authority.
The final decision for application type shall be made by:
A. Type I — the department.
B. Type 11— the department.
C. Type III — the hearing examiner.
D. Type IV — the city council preceded by a recommendation by planning commission. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.070 Required application procedures.
The required procedures for Type I, II, and III applications are set forth in the following table. The specific
procedures required for Type IV applications are set forth in SVMC 17.80.140 and 17.80.150.
Table 17.80-2 — Permit Type and Land Use Application
Application
Type
Pre-
application
conference
Counter-
complete
determination
Fully
complete
determination
Notice of
application
17.80.110
1Notice of
Ipublic
shearing
Final
decision
and notice
17.80.080
17.80.090
17.80.100
17.80.120
17.80.130
I
0
X
X
NIA
N/A
X
*11
* *O
X
X
X
N/A
X
III
X
X
X
X
X
X
X Required 0 Optional N/A Not Applicable
*Does not apply to SEPA threshold determinations. Refer to
requirements.
SVMC 21.20.070(B)(2) for
noticing
**Except for short subdivisions and binding site plans which require a pre - application meeting.
(Ord. 09 -010 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
httrd/ whw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 4116
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
17.80.080 Pre - application conference.
A. Purpose. To provide the City and other agency staff with a sufficient level of detail about the proposed
development; to enable staff to advise the applicant of applicable approvals and requirements; to
acquaint the applicant with the applicable requirements of the SVMC and other laws; and to identify
issues and concems in advance of a formal application.
B. Pre-Application. Type 11 and III applicants shall schedule a pre - application conference and provide
information requested in advance of the meeting.
C. Pre Application Waivers. The director may waive the pre - application conference if determined that the
proposal has few development - related issues, in oI es subsequent phases of an approved development,
or is substantially similar to a prior proposal affecting substantially the same property. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.090 Counter - complete determination.
A. Determination and Application Content. Prior to accepting an application, the department shall
determine whether the application is counter -complete. A counter - complete application shall contain all
information requested in the applicable form. Review for counter -complete status does not include an
evaluation of the substantive adequacy of the information in the application.
B. Incomplete Application. If the department determines that the application is not counter - complete,
the application shall be rejected and the applicant advised of the information needed to complete the
application.
C. Counter - Complete Application. Counter -complete applications shall be accepted for review for fully
complete determination. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.100 Fully complete determination.
A. Determination. Once a counter -complete application has been accepted, the department shall, within
28 calendar days, provide a written detemiination delivered by mail or in person to the applicant that the
application is fully complete, or if incomplete, a list of what is required to make the application
complete. The names of agencies of local, state, or federal governments that may have jurisdiction over
some aspect of the application to the extent known by the City will be provided to the applicant.
B. Incomplete Application. If the necessary information is not provided by the applicant within 60 days,
the department shall:
1. Reject and return the application;
2. Issue a decision denying the application, based on a lack of information. The applicant may
reinitiate the fully complete review process without additional fees; provided, that the required
information is provided by a date specified by the department; or
3. The applicant may withdraw the application by submitting a request in writing and may be
entitled to the return of up to 80 percent of the fees submitted.
C. Fully Complete Application. If the department determines that any application is fully complete, the
department shall, within 14 calendar days, issue a notice of application pursuant to SVMC 17.80.110.
htlpJ Mnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 5/16
4/312014 Spokane Valley Minicipal Code
D. Request for Additional Information. A fully complete determination shall not preclude the City from
requesting additional information, studies or changes to submitted information or plans if new
information is required or substantial changes to the proposal occur.
E. Revocation. An application's fully complete and nesting status may be rewked if the department
determines that the applicant intentionally submitted false information.
F. Within 14 calendar days after an applicant has submitted additional infomiation identified by the City
as necessary for a complete application, the City shall notify the applicant whether the application is
complete or what additional information is necessary. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.110 Notice of application.
A. Contents. Within 14 calendar days after an application is determined fully complete, the department
shall issue a notice of application.
1. All notices of applications shall include the following:
a. The case file number(s), the date of application, and the date a fully complete application
was filed;
b. A description of the proposed project and a list of project permits included with the
application, as well as the identification of other permits not included in the application, to the
extent known to the City;
c. The proposed SEPA threshold determination, if applicable;
d. The identification of any existing environmental documents that may be used to evaluate the
proposed project;
e. A statement of the public comment period; a statement that the public has the right to
comment on the application, receive notice of the decision, and request a copy of the decision
once made, and a statement of any appeal rights;
f. The name of the applicant or applicant's authorized representative and the name, address,
and telephone number of a contact person for the applicant, if any;
g. A description of the site, including current zoning and nearest road intersections, sufficient
to inform the reader of its location and zoning;
h. A map showing the subject property in relation to other properties or a reduced copy of the
site plan;
I. The date, place, and times where information about the application may be examined and
the name and telephone number of the City representative to contact about the application;
and
j. Any additional information determined appropriate by the department.
2. In addition to the requirements listed in subsection (A)(1) of this section, a Type 11 notice of
application shall state:
httpJlwww.codepublishi ng.conYWNspolmnermlley html 6116
4/312014 Spokane Valley Mtnicipal Code
a. That failure of any party to address the relevant approval criteria with sufficient specificity
may result in the denial of the application;
b. That all evidence relied upon by the department to make the decision shall be contained
within the record and is available for public review, and that copies can be obtained at a
reasonable cost from the department;
c. That after the comment period closes, the department shall issue a Type 11 notice of
decision.
3. In addition to the requirements listed in subsection (A)(1) of this section, a Type 111 application
shall state:
a. That a staff report will be available for inspection at least seven days before the public
hearing, and written comments may be submitted at any time prior to the closing of the record
for the public hearing.
B. Distribution of Notice of Application. The notice of application shall be published in an appropriate
regional or neighborhood newspaper or trade journal and sent to the following persons by regular mail:
1. The applicant;
2. All adjacent property owners of record as shown on the most recent property tax assessment
roll;
3. Any governmental agency entitled to notice; and
4. Any person filing a written request for a copy of the notice of application.
C. Type I Exception. A notice of application is not required for Type I applications.
D. Comment Period. The department shall allow 14 calendar days for Type 11 applications and 30
calendar days for Type III applications after the date the notice of application is mailed and posted on
the subject property, for individuals to submit comments. Within seven calendar days after the close of
the public comment period, the department shall mail to the applicant a copy of written public
comments, including e-mail communications timely received in response to the notice of application
together with a statement that the applicant may submit a written response to these comments within
14 calendar days from the date the comments are mailed. The department, in making this decision,
shall consider written comments timely received in response to the notice of application and timely
written responses to those comments, including e-mail communications, submitted by the applicant.
(Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.120 Notice of public hearing.
A public hearing is required for Type III applications.
A. Content of Notice of Public Hearing. Notices of public hearing shall contain the following information:
1. The application and /or project number;
2. Project summary/description of each project permit application;
http://whwoodepubl shi ng .conYWA/spolamenel I ey.html
7/16
4/312014 Spokane Valley Minicipal Code
3. The designation of the hearing body;
4. The date, time, and place of the hearing and a statement that the hearing will be conducted in
accordance with the rules of procedure adopted by the hearing body;
5. General project location, vicinity, address, and parcel number(s), if applicable;
6. The name of the applicant or applicant's authorized representative and the name, address and
telephone number of a contact person for the applicant, if any;
7. The SEPA threshold determination, or description thereof, shall be contained in the notice, along
with any appropriate statement regarding any shared or divided lead agency status and phased
review and stating the end of any final comment period;
8. A statement regarding the appeal process; and
9. The date when the staff report will be available and the place and times where it can be
reviewed.
B. Distribution of Notices of Public Hearing. Notices of public hearing shall be mailed, posted, and
published at least 15 days prior to the hearing date and shall be distributed as follows:
1. Notice by Mail. All property owners within 400 feet of the subject property by first class mail.
Where any portion of the property abutting the subject property is owned, controlled, or under the
option of the project property owner, then all property owners within a 400 -foot radius of the total
ownership interest shall be notified by first class mail. Property owners are those shown on the
most recent Spokane County assessor's /treasurer's database as obtained by the title company no
more than 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled public hearing. In addition, notice shall be sent
to the following:
a. Agencies with jurisdiction (SEPA);
b. Municipal corporations or organization with which the City has executed an interlocal
agreement; and
c. Other persons who the City determines may be affected by the proposed action or who
requested such notice in wilting.
2. Notice by Sign. A sign a minimum of 16 square feet (four feet in width by four feet in height) in
area shall be posted by the applicant on the site along the most heavily traveled street adjacent to
the subject property. The sign shall be provided by the applicant. The sign shall be constructed of
material of sufficient weight and reasonable strength to withstand normal weather conditions. The
sign shall be lettered and spaced as follows:
a. A minimum of two -inch border on the top, sides, and bottom of the sign;
b. The first line in four -inch letters shall read "Notice of Public Hearing ";
c. Spacing between all lines shall be a minimum of three inches; and
d. The text of the sign shall include the following information in three -inch letters:
http://whwcodepublishing .corrYWAispcicarmel Iey.htrnl
8/16
413/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
i. Proposal;
ii. Applicant;
iii. File number;
iv. Hearing (date and time);
v. Location; and
M. Review authority.
3. Notice by Publication. Publish one notice in an appropriate regional or neighborhood newspaper
or trade journal. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.130 Final decision.
A. Timeline to Make Final Decision — Type I. The department shall approve, approve with conditions, or
deny a Type I application within 60 calendar days after the date the application was accepted as fully
complete, unless accompanied by a SEPA checklist. Time spent by the applicant to revise plans or
provide additional studies or materials requested by the City shall not be included in the 60 -day period.
An applicant may agree in writing to extend the time in which the department shall issue a decision.
The department's decision shall address all of the relevant approval criteria applicable to the
development application.
B. Timeline to Make Final Decision — Type 11 and III. The final decision on a Type II and III application
shall be made not more than 120 calendar days (90 days for subdivisions) after the date a fully complete
determination is made. This period shall not include:
1. Time spent by the applicant to revise plans or provide additional studies or materials requested
by the City;
2. Time spent preparing an environmental impact statement;
3. Time between submittal and resolution of an appeal; or
4. Any extension of time mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the City in writing.
C. Contents of Final Decision. The final decision on Type II and III applications shall contain the following
information:
1. The nature of the application in sufficient detail to apprise persons entitled to notice of the
applicant's proposal and of the decision;
2. The address or other geographic description of the subject property, including a map of the site
in relation to the surrounding area, where applicable;
3. The date the decision shall become final, unless appealed;
4. A statement that all persons who have standing under Chapter 17.90 SVMC may appeal the
decision;
5. A statement in boldface type briefly explaining how an appeal can be filed, the deadline for filing
http..//www.codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevslIey.htrr
'16
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
such an appeal, and where further information can be obtained conceming the appeal;
6. A statement that the complete case file, including findings, conclusions, decisions and
conditions of approval, if any, is available for review. The notice of final decision shall list the place,
days, and times where the case file is available and the name and telephone number of the City
representative to contact about reviewing the case file;
7. A statement of the facts demonstrating how the application does or does not comply with
applicable approval criteria;
8. A statement of the basis of decision pursuant to the SVMC and other applicable law;
9. The reasons for a conclusion to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application;
10. The decision to approve or deny the application and, if approved, conditions of approval
necessary to ensure the proposed development will comply with applicable law; and
11. The date the final decision is mailed.
D. Notice of the Final Decision. All final decisions shall be sent by regular mail to the following:
1. The applicant;
2. Any governmental agency entitled to notice;
3. Any person filing a written request for a copy of the notice of application or the final decision;
and
4. Any person who testified at the hearing or who provided substantive written comments on the
application during the public comment period and provided a mailing address. (Ord. 07 -015 § 4,
2007).
17.80.140 Type IV applications — Comprehensive Plan amendments, development
agreements associated with a Comprehensive Plan amendment, and area -wide
rezones.
A. Initiation. Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide rezones may be initiated by any of the
following:
1. Property owner(s) or their representatives;
2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or
3. The department, planning commission, or city council.
B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the City.
C. Application Submittal.
1. Applicant Initiated. Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide rezones shall be subject to
a pre- application conference, counter -complete, and fully complete determinations pursuant to
SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100. The date upon fully complete determination shall be
htlpJ Mnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 10/16
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Wild pal Code
the date of registration with the department.
2. Non - Applicant Initiated. After submittal of a non - applicant - initiated application, the application
shall be placed on the register.
D. Register of Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Area -Wide Rezones. The department shall
establish and maintain a register of all applications.
E. Concurrent and Annual Review of Register.
1. Sixty days prior to November 1st in each calendar year, the City shall notify the public that the
amendment process has begun. Notice shall be distributed as follows:
a. Notice published in an appropriate regional or neighborhood newspaper or trade journal;
b. Notice posted on all of the City's official public notice boards; and
c. Copy of the notice sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions with an
interest.
2. All registered applications shall be reviewed concurrently, on an annual basis and in a manner
consistent with RCW 36.70A.130(2). Applications registered after November 1st of the previous
calendar year and before November 1st of the current calendar year shall be included in the annual
review. Those registered after November 1st of the calendar year shall be placed on the register for
review at the following annual review.
3. Emergency Amendments. The City may review and amend the Comprehensive Plan when the
city council determines that an emergency exists or in other circumstances as provided for by
RCW 36.70A.130(2)(a).
F. Notice of Public Hearing. Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide rezones require a public
hearing before the planning commission.
1. Contents of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall include the following:
a. The citation, if any, of the provision that would be changed by the proposal along with a brief
description of that provision;
b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected provision;
c. A statement of what areas, Comprehensive Plan designations, zones, or locations will be
directly affected or changed by the proposal;
d. The date, time, and place of the public hearing;
e. A statement of the availability of the official file; and
f. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the planning
commission and to appear at the public hearing of the planning commission to give oral
comments on the proposal.
2. Distribution of Notice. The department shall distribute the notice pursuant to SVMC
httpJMnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspcl®nevsl Iey.htrr 11/16
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
17.80.120(B).
G. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following the public hearing, the planning
commission shall consider the applications concurrently, and shall prepare and forward a
recommendation of proposed action for all applications to the city council. The planning commission
shall take one of the following actions:
1. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it may, by a
majority vote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The planning commission may
make modifications to any proposal prior to recommending the proposal to city council for
adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planning commission must conduct a public hearing
on the modified proposal;
2. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should not be adopted, it may, by a
majority vote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or
3. tithe planning commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in subsection (G)(1)
or (2) of this section, the proposal will be sent to city council with the notation that the planning
commission makes no recommendation.
H. Approval Criteria.
1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area -wide zone map amendments
if it finds that:
a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare, and protection of the environment;
b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and
with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the
property owners control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error, or
e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan
amendments:
a. The effect upon the physical environment;
b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes;
c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and sunDunding neighborhoods;
d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public
transportation, parks, recreation, and schools;
e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region;
htlpJ Mnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 12/16
413/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the
demand for such land;
g. The current and projected population density in the area; and
h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
I. City Council Action. Within 60 days of receipt of the planning commission's findings and
recommendations, the city council shall consider the findings and recommendations of the commission
conceming the application and may hold a public hearing pursuant to council rules. The department
shall distribute notice of the council's public hearing pursuant to SVMC 17.80.120(B). All annual
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall be considered concurrently. By a majority vote of its
membership, the city council shall:
1. Approve the application;
2. Disapprove the application;
3. Modify the application. If the modification is substantial, the council must either conduct a public
hearing on the modified proposal; or
4. Refer the proposal back to the planning commission for further consideration.
J. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least 60 days prior to final action being taken by the city
council, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED)
shall be provided with a copy of the amendments in order to initiate the 60 -day comment period. No later
than 10 days after adoption of the proposal, a copy of the final decision shall be forwarded to CTED.
(Ord. 10 -004 § 2, 2010; Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.150 Type IV applications — Text amendments to the uniform development code.
A. Initiation. Text amendments to this code may be initiated by any of the following:
1. Property owner(s) or their representatives;
2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or
3. The department, planning commission, or city council.
B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provided by the City.
C. Application Submittal.
1. After submittal of an applicant- initiated application, the application shall be subject to a pre -
application conference, counter -complete determination, and fully complete determination pursuant
to SVMC 17.80.080, 17.80.090, and 17.80.100.
2. After submittal, the application shall be placed on the next available planning commission
agenda.
D. Notice of Public Hearing. Amendments to this code require a public hearing before the planning
commission.
htlpJ Mnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 13/16
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Municipal Code
1. Contents of Notice. A notice of public hearing shall include the following:
a. The citation, if any, of the provision that would be changed by the proposal along with a brief
description of that provision;
b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected provision;
c. The date, time, and place of the public hearing;
d. A statement of the availability of the official file; and
e. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the planning
commission and to appear at the public hearing of the planning commission to give oral
comments on the proposal.
2. Distribution of Notice. The department shall distribute the notice to the applicant, newspaper,
City Hall and the main branch of the library.
E. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following the public hearing, the planning
commission shall consider the proposal and shall prepare and forward a recommendation to the city
council. The planning commission shall take one of the following actions:
1. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it may, by a
majority vote, recommend that the city council adopt the proposal. The planning commission may
make modifications to any proposal prior to recommending the proposal to city council for
adoption. If the modification is substantial, the planning commission must conduct a public hearing
on the modified proposal;
2. If the planning commission determines that the proposal should not be adopted, it may, by a
majority vote, recommend that the city council not adopt the proposal; or
3. If the planning commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in subsection (E)(1)
or (2) of this section, the proposal will be sent to city council with the notation that the planning
commission makes no recommendation.
F. Approval Criteria. The City may approve amendments to this code if it finds that:
1. The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan; and
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment.
G. City Council Action. Within 60 days of receipt of the planning commission's findings and
recommendations, the city council shall consider the findings and recommendations of the commission
conceming the application and may hold a public hearing pursuant to council rules. The department
shall distribute notice of the council's public hearing pursuant to SVMC 17.80.120(B). By a majority
vote, the city council shall:
1. Approve the application;
htlpJ Mnvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspclmnevsl Iey.htrr 14116
4/3/2014 SpoMane Valley Wild pal Code
2. Disapprove the application;
3. Modify the application. If modification is substantial, the council must either conduct a public
hearing on the modified proposal; or
4. Refer the proposal back to the planning commission for further consideration.
H. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least 60 days prior to final action being taken by the city
council, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED)
shall be provided with a copy of the amendments in order to initiate the 60 -day comment period. No later
than 10 days after adoption of the proposal, a copy of the final decision shall be forwarded to CTED.
(Ord. 09 -010 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
17.80.160 Optional consolidated review process.
A. Optional Consolidated Review Process. This optional process provides for the consideration of all
discretionary land use, engineering, and environmental permits issued by the City if requested in writing
from the applicant. Permit decisions of other agencies are not included in this process; but public
meetings and hearings for other agencies may be coordinated with those of the City. Where multiple
approvals are required for a single project, the optional consolidated review process is composed of the
following:
1. Pre - Application Meeting. A single pre- application meeting will be conducted for all applications
submitted under the optional consolidated review process.
2. Determination of Completeness. When a consolidated application is deemed complete, a
consolidated determination of completeness will be made pursuant to SVMC 17.80.100.
3. Notice of Application. When a consolidated application is deemed complete, a consolidated
notice of application will be issued pursuant to the provisions of SVMC
4. Comment Period. The consolidated application shall provide for one comment period for all
permits included in the consolidated application.
5. The City will issue a decision(s) for Type I or Type 11 permits prior to scheduling a public hearing
for any companion Type III permit. Appeals of administrative permits that are part of a consolidated
application will be heard in a single, consolidated open record appeal hearing before the hearing
examiner on the same agenda as the companion Type III application.
6. Notice of Public Hearing. A single notice of public hearing will be provided for consolidated
permit applications. The notice will include the Type III permit to be heard and any open record
appeals of administrative portions of the consolidated application.
7. Notice of Decision. The hearing examiner shall issue a single notice of decision regarding all
Type I and Type 11 appeals and all Type III project permit applications subject to a public hearing.
(Ord. 07 -015 § 4, 2007).
httr.// wvw. codepublishing .corrYWAlspermnevsl Iey.htrr 15/16
4/3/2014 Spolene Valley Minicipal Code
The Spokane Valley Municipal Code is current through
Ordinance No. 14 -002, passed February 11, 2014.
Disclaimer. The CityClerk's Office has the official version of the
Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Users should contactthe City
Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the
ordinance cited above.
•
http: Ilwww. codepublishing .comlWAlspokaneualley.html 16/16
i:4'
s 0
■ ■■I Miss
Sharp ®- Sharp,
■ ■ ■ ■ ■e ■�m.�■ ■- a■i I
!■■■I.!11 ■fi e
Boone ��
r ;ui1■■1�■ 1l!:
e■ ®!!■I■i■ w� -,
■r.�
PP
Cateldo
11§•1.IU1, 11...16■
111111 - u . •iu� ■i
lon Mallon
1 ■ ■■■■ m 1 ■
Milminin 1
■!: i ■ ■ii 1
1.111!■■!■
Sprin field II•IIIIIII
Alki
111 ■m® -
_ Alki ■ y 11
■
■ a � Olive
■m■ • .. '■
Broadway; "'
Mansfield
w - -•
li!hanpur
ink
�! i
'_ Michielli _ - -
I
Indiana
May 27, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments — Lori Barlow
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Map — Lori Barlow
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of April 9, 2014; 1:30 p.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
To: Council & Staff
From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
April 22, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, April 14]
Proclamation: National Drug Endangered Children Awareness Day
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Ordinance 14 -004 Adopting Findings of Fact, Marijuana Regulations — E Lamb (15 minutes)
3. Proposed Resolution 14 -004 Appleway Trail Grant — Mike Stone (10 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Adams Road Resurfacing, 4th to Sprague — Steve Worley (10 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Noxious Weeds Board Assessment — Cary Driskell (15 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Gender Identity and Public Restrooms — Cary Driskell (10 minutes)
7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
8. Info Only: (a) Appleway Landscaping Phase 1; (b) Dept Monthly Reports [ *estimated meeting: 70 minutes]
April 29, 2014, No Meeting
May 6, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Lori Barlow
NON - ACTION ITEMS
2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
3. Info Only: (a) Stormwater Effectiveness Studies Consultant Agreement; (b) Stormwater
CIP 2015 -2020 [ *estimated meeting: 125 minutes]
[due Mon, April 28]
( -120 minutes)
May 13, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, May 5]
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Motion Consideration: Bid Award Appleway Landscaping, Phase 1 — Eric Guth (15 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Stormwater Effectiveness Studies Consultant Agreement — Eric Guth (15 minutes)
4. Admin Report: Comp Plan Amendments (CPA 2014) Admin Report — Lori Barlow (40 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
May 20, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Motion Consideration: Proceed with Comprehensive Plan Amendments — Lori Barlow
NON - ACTION ITEMS:
2. Admin Report: Stormwater CIP 2015 -2020 — Eric Guth
3. Draft 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley
4. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, May 12]
(20 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 60 minutes]
[due Mon, May 19]
(5 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 4/10/2014 10:34:53 AM
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
Page 1 of 2
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Amendments — Lori Barlow
4. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comp Plan Map — Lori Barlow
June 3, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, May 26]
1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
June 10, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
[due Mon, June 2]
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes;
(10 minutes;
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
June 17, 2014: Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m.
Spokane Valley City Council Chambers
No evening meeting June 17, 2014
June 18 -20, 2014 AWC Annual Conference, Spokane Convention Center
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: 35 minutes]
June 24, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2015 -2020 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
July 1, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
July 8, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
July 15, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
July 22, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
July 29, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
[due Mon, June 9]
[due Mon, June 16]
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[ *estimated meeting: minutes]
[due Mon, June 23]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, June 30]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, July 7]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, July 14]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, July 21]
1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
OTHER PENDING AND /OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
ADA Transition Plan
Centennial Trail Agreement
CDBG (Comm Dev Block Grants) [Sept 2014]
Coal /Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement
Economic Incentives
Fire and Life Safety Code
Future Acquisition Areas
Historic Preservation
Interim Marijuana Regulations [expire Aug 11, 2014]
SEPA/NEPA Process — Eric Guth
Stormwater Swales, care of
Draft Advance Agenda 4/10/2014 10:34:53 AM
Street Vacation/Connectivity Process
Urban Agriculture (animals, bees, etc.)
*time for public or Council comments not included
Page 2 of 2