VE-183-84
• .
t✓
RECEIVED
~
ZONING ADJUSTOR MAR 2 9 1985
' SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTUN
SPOKAN-r CQUP!TY ENGINEER
IN 7hE MATTER UF RELAXATION UF FLANKING ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
STREET SETBACK AND SETBACK REQUIREMEN7 ) CONCLUSIUNS, DECISIUN ANU
FOR CANOPiES (vE-183-84); ) CoNUiTIONS OF APPROVAL
LES SCNWAB TIkE CENrtR )
THIS MATTER, Bei ng the consi derati on by the Zoni ng Adjustor of Spokane
County, i n heari ng appl i cati on VE-183-84, herei nafter referred to as the
"Froposal and the Zoni ng Adj ustor of Spokar:e Caunty havi ng hel ci apuhl ?c
hearing on March 19, 19$5 and having fully considered all testimony presented
the reat, and further having visited the site and vicinity in question, and
having rendered a decision on the 26th day of March, 1985, denying the
applicant;s full request but APPRCYING a modified, less extensive proposal,
makes the following:
F IND INGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is generally located between Eastern and Dy(M
Roads, south of Alki Avenue and north of Atlas Street in the Spokane Yalley
between the Broadway and Sprague Avenue interchanges on Interstate 9U, west of
Interstate 90, and is further described as Assessors Parcel #13533-U703 and
13533-07U5, being more specifically described by several documents contained
i n Zoni ng Adjustor Fi le VE-183-84.
2. That the proposal as set forth by the applicant proposes to locate
the canopy beyond the fl anki ny street property 1 i ne and i nto a ri ght-of-way
leased f rom and owned by the Washington State Department of Transportation,
whereas the Zoni ng Ordi nance requi res a canopy to mai ntai n a 1 U foot setback
f rom the fl anki ng street property 1 i ne.
3, i hat the Departneni of T;^ansportation r; ght-of-way has replaced *hP
Dy,re-,Road ri ght-of-way i n thi s area and i s the ri ght-of-way wi th regard to
which the flanking street measurements are based.
4. That the adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the
area of the proposal as Industrial and the proposal is consistent with the
County's entire Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Plan.
5. That the site is zoned Manufacturing which would allow the proposed
use upon approval of this application.
6. That the existing land uses in the area of the proposal include
Ri tchi e Ri 1 ey and Shook Ti re Center to the north, several heavy Comrnerci al and
outdoor storage areas to the west and the south, and several interior and
outdoor storage heavy commercial enterprises to the east, most notably the GMC
truck and a related recreational vehicle dealer, all of which are compatible
with the proposal.
7. That the Zoni ng Adjustor fi nds speci al ci rcumstances do exi st
regarding this proposal, which give reason to grant some level of variance,
although not to the full extent requested.
b, ihat it is the presence ot the washington ueparz,nent of
Transportation right-of-way which has caused the applicant to submit a request
in order to construct even a minimumly sized canopy; that the applicant has
requested that considerable new paving be applied to the unpaved areas in
order to improve the worki ng and safety condi ti ons for employees as they
attempt to jack up heavy equipment on soft ground, and that the Zoning
Adj ustor i s taki ng no posi ti on wi th regard to addi ti onal concrete sl ab area
except to recognize that much of the right-of-way on the east side of previous
Dy(o Road is already completely paved between the street surface and the face
of the adj acent bui 1 di ngs and to further note that greatly i mproved safety
conditions would exist for employees if more concrete slab area could be
provi ded on the east si de of the present Les Schwab 1'i re Center bui 1 di ng.
iL V.
. *
. .
FINUINGS OF FAC7, CONCLUSIONS, UECISION AND CUNUITIUNS OF APPRUVNL
FILE VE-183-84 PAGE 2
9. 7hat an interview with a representative of the Washington Department
of Transportion indicated that the Uepartment of Transportation right-of-way
in this area can serve no real purpose in improving the interchange designs at
either Broadway Avenue or Sprague Avenue; and that this stretch of
ri ght-of-way wi 11 most 1 i kely become surpl us property i n the next few years
and revert back to the existing private and public entities (Spokane County)
for ownership and control; that the Zoning Adjustor assumes that in the long
tenn, the fornier ri ght-of-way for Dyre Avenue wi 11 be establ i shed as a County
road right-of-way with an alignment similiar to that which exists north of
Alki Avenue, and that the Zoning Adjustor both inspected the site and the
vicinity twice, once on March 14, and again on March 18, 1985, and also
conducted on 14arch 18th an i ntervi ew wi th the manager of the Ri tchi e Ri 1 ey and
Shook Tire Center, East 6328 Springfield.
lU. That Ritchie Riley and Shook Tire Center is essentially the same kind
of operation, having its fronting street address on and east-west street and
considering Dy!~§)Road to be a flanking street; that Kitchie Riley Shook
operates i ts pri mary heavy duty truck servi ce f rom i ts fl anki ng street
1 ocati on on Dy,re Avenue; that they use a smal 1 concrete pad for worki ng on
large rigs as well as utilizing most of the unpaved flanking street yard out
to the edge of the paved roadway; and finally that the manager volunteered
that worki ng on a non-concrete area wi thout a canopy to protect from i nclement
weather was hazardous to his employees.
11. The Ritchie Riley Shook building appears to be located on the allowed
bui 1 di ng setback 1 i ne of 2U feet f rom the fl anki ng street property 1 i ne,
whereas the Les Schwab Tire building appears to be located 40 feet from the
old Uy're` koad right-of-way property line;that the Zoning Adjustor does not
wi sh to set a precedent of establ i shi ng a canopy aRy cl oser to the al i gnment
of old Uy,1 e~Road than would be permitted outright for the properties
imnediately no rth of Alki (permits a canopy to extend to within lU feet of the
Dyre;Road ri ght-of-way 1 i ne but that i t woul d be i n the publ i c i nterest to
create improved of employee working conditions to the greatest extent possible
wh;1 e not establ i shi ng i ntr•us -lons i nto the ri;ht-of -Way, nor i ntrusi ons
further into the flanking street yard than would be allowed under the terms of
the Zoni ng Urdi nance.
12. That there is no similiar commonly enjoyed privilege of having a
canopied work space in the vicinity of the project (except the applicant:s own
canopied automobile work space on the north side of the existing building),
but there are extinuating circumstances of hazardous workiny conditions that
militate in favor of granting a variance which would substantially improve the
worki ng condi ti ons of the workers i f such a vari ance woul d not be materi al 1y
detrimental to the public welfare.
13. That it is the unique shape and size of the property as currently
defined by the Department of Transportation right-of-way which has greatly
contibuted to the applicant's seeking a variance.
14. That without the circumstances of the Department of Transportation
right-of-way the applicant would be allowed out right a canopy approximately
30 feet f rom the face of the bui 1 di ng.
15. That the Zoning Adjustor has summarized ma Ry of the above
circumstances in the YE-183-84 file on Exhibit A"Decision Summary" (Attached).
16, That the proposal is exempt f rom the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW
pursuant to WAC 197-11-8UO(6)(b).
17. 7hat the applicant has been made aware of the recommendations of
. vari ous County/State agenci es revi ewi ng thi s project and has i ndi cated they
can comply with those recommendations.
18. That no one appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written
comments adverse to the proposal received.
19. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing
before the Zoning Aajustor of Spokane County have been met.
~
•
FINUINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS, DECISION ANU CONUITIONS OF APPKOVAL
FILE YE-183-84 PAGE 3
2U. That the creation of new paved area subject to vehicle oil,
antifreeze and other leaks, has a cummlative detrimental impact to the sole
source aquifer, and that the Zoning Adjustor can impose such conditions as
necessary to mitigate a likely detrime ntal effect upon the public welfare.
From the Fi ndi ngs of Fact, the Zoni ng Adjustor comes to these :
CONCLUSIONS
1. The proposal as set forth by the applicants rnay be detrimental to and
not compatible with the public health, safety and general welfare; but the
project as suggested to be modified by the Zoning Adjustor will not be
detrimental to and is compatible with the public health, safety and general
welfare as it would set no unacceptable precedent with regard to similiar
future structures on Dryer koad, wher,eas granti ng a vari ance for the
applicant.'s proposal would establishe~ such a precedence.
2. The subject property i s not depri ved of pri vi 1 eges commonly enjoyed
by other properti es i n the same vi ci ni ty and zone and a vari ance need not be
granted to remedy any di fferences i n pri vi 1 eges, but there are unsafe worki ng
conditions at the site which could be partially remedied by approval of a
1 arge canopy.
3. Due to the excessive setback of the existing structure f rom the old
Dy re',Road alignment, a canopy could be added to the building, and while it
woul d extend i nto the Department of Transportati on ri ght-of-way, i t woul d only
extend to wi thi n 10 feet of Dy-re Road property 1 i ne, whi ch woul d be al 1 owed by
the Zoning Ordinance under the circumstances that exist at the site.
4. Such a canopy would not set a precedent on Dyre/koad, a ma,jor concern
of tha Zoning Adjustor, which would be a special privilege with regard to
deviation rrom the standard setback lines and normal standards of the Zoning
Ordi nance.
5. The granting of the variance as proposed by the applicant would be a
grant of special privilege inconsistent with that potentially able to be
enjoyed by other properti es i n the vi ci ni ty and zone, parti cul arly noti ng the
similiar tire business immediately to the north; but the granting of the
1 i mi ted vari ance by the Zoni ng Adj ustor woul d not be precedent setti ng wi th
regard to granting special privileges to other businesses in the area, in so
far as the project as measured against the Zoning Urdinance standards and old
Dy re Road alignment is consistent with the current provisions of the Zoning
Ordi nance.
6. The strict application of the standards of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordi nance do not depri ve the subj ect property of ri ghts and pri vi 1 eges of
other properties in the area and under the identical zone.
7. The granting of the variance as proposed by the applicant is judged
by the Zoni ng Adjustor to be materi al ly detri mental to the publ i c wel fare, but
not i r~j u ri ous to property or i mprovements i n the vi ci ni ty and zone i n whi ch
the subject property i s located.
8. The likely detrimental impacts to the sole source aquifer, as a
result of the paved wo rk area, should be mitigated, and the detrimental
similiar drainage f rom the existing work area should be mitigate.3if possible
wi th thi s pe rmi t.
DECISION
From the foregoi ng Fi ndi ngs of Fact and Gonclusions, the Zoni ng Adjustor
denies the variance as set forth by the applicant, but APPRUVES a modified
project and variance. The following CUNDITIONS UF APPROVAL are stipulated.
,
.
, . • '
FINUINGS UF FACT, CONCLUSIUNS, UECISIUN ANU CUNUITIONS UF APPROVAL
FILE VE-183-84 PAGE 4
CUNDITIONS OF APPROYAL
1. There are no restri cti ons wi th regard to addi ti onal conc rete sl ab
working areas between the east face of the existing building as such concrete
pads provi de safe, stabl e worki ng areas for empl oyees who by necessi ty are
jacki ng up extremely heavy vehicl es i n the process of thei r dai ly work.
2. The canopy on the east side of the existing building is approved to a
di stance f rom the bui 1 di ng of approxi mately 3U feet, but to no di stance cl oser
*han 10 feet from the exi sti ng Dyre ri ght-of-way 1 i ne projected southward f rom
tt;e ri ght-of-way 1 i ne north of A1 ki Avenue, whi ch shal 1 be assumed to be
coi nci dent wi th the east 1 i ne of 1 ot 1b. Mi ni mumal 1y, the Pl anni ng, Bui 1 di ng
and Safety, and Engi neeri ng Uepartments shal 1 revi ew and approve pl ans. If
any question arises as to the location of the allowed eastern canopy, a survey
. may be ordered by arly department of County government which deems i t necessary.
3. The canopy i s not restri cted i n i ts north-south si ze di mensi on,
except that it may not protrude beyond either the north or south end of the
exi sti ng bui 1 di ng.
4. A graphic description of these conditions of approval is depicted on
Exhi bi t A. "Ueci si on Summary", contai ned wi thi n the Zoni ng Adj ustor Fi 1 e
VE-183-84, initialed "tgm',", dated 3/18/85, and attached hereto.
5. No paving shall occur which will pave over a drainfield area.
6. A drainage plan shall be prepared, submitted and approved by the
County Engineers Office and should include "208" type mitigation measures, if
judged practical by the Engineers staff.
DATcO THIS 28Th DAY OF MARCH, 1985.
~
1
TNOMA (Ga. MUSNE , AICN,
ZONING ADJUSTOR, POKANE COUNTY,
WASNING70N
F ILEU :
1) Applicant
2) Parties of Record
3) Spokane County En9i neers Office ~
4) Spokane County Dept. of Building & Safety
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVEU BY ThIS UECISIUN MUST FILE. AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN
(1 U) CALENDAR t7AYS UF TFiIS DATE.
Uu76z
3-2t3-85
-
.~I
_ ~ . , ,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS QEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT .
♦ •
..Certifi cate of Exemption No. : Appl i cation No.
N ame o f Ap p 1 i can t: I-e,-5 .,5"wvi Ti rc• 6r~-4 le-es of'" S vA~;nc- -Ch L.
•
, Street Address : R.o. 4?o~( 07 ~ihN~'/~ ~y•~
. . ~..~P ~
A Ci ty: State : Zi p Code: 9;7zs41 Tel e. No. :vr03-Vy? -~r36
. N ame o f P ro e.rt Own e r s: fiklIz:- P Y ~ ) Tb Co M)"A
.
~
~
. • , Reqvested Action(s) (Circle Appropriate Action): . ,
* • . Q .
~.~fanc,{s~ , Conditional Use Permit Adninistrative Appeal .
~Temporary PerrrIt Waiv~r of :1 ia1; 3t1~►~ ' 0_he'r,.. - . . . _ .
Zerro Lot Line Non-Conforming Lot/Use - -
, .
, , . , it * ~Ir 'k ~r ~r ~t ~r ir * ~c 'rk k k ~t ylr * * k ylt * - Ir k * * * * ~r d * * yt * Mc ~c ~c * yk k tk 1F ~c de ~r
.y , FOR STAFF USE ONLY iopsvnl- .
Y, -'Citg Ordinance Sectton :41.12►646t3~ - 2OIfI4Akin
bigaaCk ' * AM!*
~ ° ~l. ~7.0 ~s~c) - i~' S~b ~►r C~r~oPtas . . ' ~ .
21
Section 13 Townshi.p -_3S Range kp y Pro ert-y 5i .w~'`r` . . , ~
. . . . .
Existinq Zo,ning Comprehensi-ve 'Plan Designati'on: ;37idoAr;,*~, ~
* . , , ~ , , • ~
* Legal Checked by: Hearing Date: Receipt
= ~ . * * ~ 'k ' * k * * * ~ * ~ * * * * * ~r * * * * * * * * .~e * ,t , ~r ~ * * '~k * ~ ' * * * ~ ` ,
. F 1 • - .
E xi $ti ng l.ls e o f P ropgr~y : "'.~,'rut-J't' 4~6ev Kw - J9.44~44 , . . . , ,
ProRASed Use of. PropertY: .,~yh,~ .
, . , . . .
St reet Addres s af P rope rty : 6,,~
v~,0 ~It"r9nc ► Gl1,~a . j t~ h , , .
, , ,
' . leqai Descriptionof Property (incluue CGtsCleflV if applicahlA) '
, . , •
ksr n
• ! j ' _ .1C.~.iL~! - , • 0 ' .
SCq~..,
.
, , .
. o, .
Parcel Source of Legal: Zi~ A-r-ar-d5
Total -amount of adjoining 1 and control led by. this owner/spansor:
What lnterest do you hol d in the property:~on~ /ei'hr a~-h 6w-4-6
~
Of ~c. ~ L~►~~~ c ~s~ cui 7f"~ ,~?L~,~ c Fv~ ~or'~o~ ~►Z`~~',*
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNEF OF REQ.LD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE.
iF ~toL IHE oWNER, WFrrTEN PERMISSiON FROM SaID.O_WNE,R,AUTHORIZiNG MY ACTIONS ON HiS/
HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED.
Ti~~
~ S ign e d.
>r`" D a te
v---~--,~u- p--~~/,.;--?~ . • --~4 - y_~}
Address : 'O DG67, &`~-Von 9725Y
, , . . . ,
" Phone lJo. • .
.
; , f•
- - , , , ,
x /j A ' ' • .
NOT A R Y :
,
DATE
~
~ • , ,
M '
l F 50'
~ • ~~4 A •R 4~SR In vi ew af the above infa r-mation , what special cir°cumstances (be,yond yau r -
r +eontrol cir actians) deprive ,you af the saw general rzghts and prZvlleges .
' af other property owners within the same zone ar~~ 'vycinity?
n . . LI
t• r ~
• - a
I f the variance were grante , how would it affect neighbaring properties
~ ~1~~.~
. or i mp rorremen ts? a-sc- ~.r~,~'/~j 7`~S&"AL,
~
1F y i } i. , ~ ~~ilf ~ f lw ~ ,
.
P015 ~.~P'J
4 ~[if~~'"'~{.]~ ~ . . . , . ` ' L
PORARY PEi~9I7S, ETC,,
, ~V~~-G~~'~~F~~~~IG ~5~~~~I_
C'D~~-1G~~/U6L~Jx RAO LO-f L'INE i ,
• , . _ , ,
-P~e~ e g~v~ ~ ~c~r~~~~e explanatior~ af the prop~o~al ir~cluding siz~e, t~a~urs Of
pe tion., expecteo traffic and other features, etc. . . .
- . t , ~y_,, ' ; y ; i ' •
~ , , . , _ : w . _ ' ,
,+'i_°, ° . e ' • . , ' - " _ . -
• - - , w ' , ' ' ' . . ' ' • ' . " • ` ' . ~ _
tsw: ~ ~ , ' . , _ ' • , • ' ; ;a •
, r " ' , _ . . . . _ . • , . ;
, • y ' - . n ^ • • , r . . ' • , , y i
. . ; _ a r ' . , • , b ~
V . Y I!/LAT1L ~JN
; , . . . n , .
L , - . .
~ , ' w w~~ the str~,ctu~ est4blished ~,utsi~ the provisions af the -
- ~ ~~;1~a~e. ~unty 2on1ng Ordiro_ar~ce?
1 2 '
rl. , ♦i ' i . . . ' ` ' ! yL. 5r . • j • . ~ • ' .
`r ' ~ .
' [ ~ ` . ' - • ' _ , • , ` -
Sr r~ . . " . ' c' . . . . r
f
0• V IARN-SFFF VY COUNTY V DEP• iRTf IEo1TS
, d
~ COUNTY HEALTN DISTRiCT
A preliminary' consul tatian has been hel dto discpss the proposal The :
app1 icant has bee ' nformed of requirements and st.andards,
S i g n at r~ Date) " ~ Sign-af f Wai ved
.
by P1 anning Staff) ,
' 2. =NTY ENGINEER' S DEPARTMENT ' . ,
_ A prelirn}nary consultation has beer~ ~~ld ta discuss the propvsal. The ap,p1 i cant has been i'nformed of r°equi rements and standards, - r
~Si natu } aa~e? ISign-aff Waived .
by Plann-ing Staff}
~ COIJ14T Y lJTI l. TT IES DEPARTMEfdT
A preliminary consultation has been held to d%5cpss the pr~~vsal.. The aPplieant has been infqrmed af requi rements and standards.
, (Sz gnature ) (Date ) ' (Sign-off Waived by Planning Staff)
ER puRVEYOR { rt f appl; cdble} Narrie: ~ .
a~ The proposal i s/is not located wi thi n the hounda.ry af our service area.
b) We are1 are not able to serve thi s si te wi th adequate water.
c) 5ati sfactorY arrangements have/have nat been mazk to serve thiz proposal.
x~ ' •~4~~~ ~ i'' kf~~~~~
~5'i gnature ) (Date) `fl oJ~ P'latini ng Staff )
~rrY
.
44~ 1
~
F11~~
,I _
.
'
~J
rt. - . • t_
' _S ~1"~1 ~ I v • _ . _ .
PLANNING DEPARTMEIVT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
' i' ~ ~ ~ Y ' r_ l °HONE 456-2205
y'u ~i~~ a
SPOKANE, WASFtINGTOtJ 99260
• • . •,--r:'.. _ `_7r-= . -
SPOKANE COUNTY GOURT NOUSE
MEMORANDUM
~
T0: Bob McCann, Engi.neers Offi ce -
FROM: Tom Mosher, AICP, Zoning Adjusto
DATE: February 19, 1985
SUBJ : Fi 1 e VE-183-84; Les Schwab Ti re Cente r
It appears from th.e i.nformati.on i.n the fi le that the appl i cant is
leasing right-of-way from the. Department of Transportation and either
has or is obtaini'ng permission to construct on that right-of-way. We
bel i eve i t i s uncertai'n as to whether there i s an over-1 appi ng ri ght-
of-way of county juri'sdicti'on (Dyer Road). This suggests to me the
possibi'lity that Spokane County may rieed to lease lands in a mariner
si mi 1 ar to the state and that I may al so need to have i nformati on
regardi_,ng whether or not the County has given i'ts permission for
construction to take pl ace. Iri your response woul d you please cl ari fy
the issue of ove.r-1 apping or dupl1cated ri,ght-of-way, i.e., the
County versus the Department of Transportati'ory and whether or not you
bel ieve express permi'ssi~on from the County is necessary for construction
to take place as propps-ed.
o~MTY . ~ 11 r • . / _ ~ ~ , , ' ~ ~ M
~ r ~ ~ •~:.~r~ • _ sS , . ~ ~r ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J/ ' .
, I IC ~r• ~ ',,r, ~ ~ , '
~ ' , ~ .1 ` ,
.E'! SO R i ' • r• ` ~ ~ ^ O ' ~ ~ ! . ' ~ j ~ ~ / . ~ , o • ~ . ~
j ~.i► +
~'"r f r y . . ~ • .Id. ~ ~N~,~/r+~M~ K. ~ •
r+~ • VI J,; - - , ~ ~a , ~ i~ ; t3 ~ f je .c~ u , ~ , , ~ .
. . ` ~ , ~ r~' ~ ~ ~ • 1 14 ~D C
QQ
sl /t
,r . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ " J . ~li
' ' ~ Q ~ ♦t j ' ~
R O - .---~D w r"~
9
~ 4 8~ r~ . ~ s ~ 3 z - • .;r' ~ y, . ~
~ f~~,,~ , ~ P ~ y g 7 ~ _ ~r ~ - . ~ ~
,
, ~ ...1 ,
"y a
~ ,3r ~4a~ ~ . r~~~ _ _ . j~ . : - ~ ~ -
y O
~ ~ ; ~ ~,s~~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -
i3 SPRlN. G~I f LD ~ I ~
, c~ . ~ .
5
~
; ~ ~+~~g`'; • ~ ~ ~a s - 3 9
T.
4 4od
-lq
~ ~ , , J-~` J/ ~l ~j ~f 17
~
¢
. ~ l? l3 . ~ Z ' . , ~ f,,, ~ r. . ♦ ~ ~ ~ _
~ r C~ ~ ~ _ , 408. 9/ . _ t :
aa~° ~ a ~ ' ~ 1 8 j ~ , ; ~ .
- ~q C K J ; p, • 9 8 7
0~
h ,
,
~
✓ 14
1 /L~
~'f ~ . .
~ ~ I ~ a•. .ra , . ,
. lf~ p .3
'1 7
A 4., ~ f ~ • y g ~ _ ~i ,Y ~ ~ ~ J •V/l
/G /1 ~s
CK ~f t
~ ►
~ , ~ ' - ~ ~ ~2 ~ % - _ ~ r ► .S ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 9
4r
. •~QJ..~~, ~ ~ Q . . 2 t 9 ~ ; ► : ~ , ; , - , ,
. AL.LE y, I
~ l/■ ~ 4
S.JA / JF
,
14
. ~ i , ~ ~ ,
, l
•w, ~ ~ /
~ , ' ~ ~tz"~i%'~' ~ ~ /
~
' n • t~A~i PI~~~Y ~~r r1
/ • ~ . ~ ~
~ ♦ ~
• ~ • . , , ~ ~ ~
~ , ~ 0~ ~
~ . ~ , 9 . . ~
. • ' / i. ` ~ V
' + . ,4 + . . . tl / ~ ~t • ~ ~ ff~~ \
• ~ , ~ i Y~,• ~ ~ '~Of~ ~ ~ •
. ~ ~ 1 . ' .P ; [ , / . J''.i• .
y • , ti~~'M~J. + a'~ f ~ / / . o 1 ' `
l ~ , . •
e0,05 /
, ' j,t • . ' ~ • ' ~ . i
9
00
• ~ ~ / . ~ .
. 0 ,t• ~ / i
, ~ . , ;-0 ~ : . , a~. ~ . • , i ,
~ 9
• . . • ~ ~ ~ i
' ~ tI . , . ~ : • P
~ ~ ~ ~ ' • ~ . ~ ~ .
0r~j
. , . . . . y
~ . . ~
. • ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
, ~ 1~ a~ • .I' ~ ~ . ,
O ~ ~t
~ . . ,
1
• ~t Z , , ~ ~ . ~
~ . .
\ ~ .
~ c'• . ~ , , . . ~ . c . , ,
tolo
, ~ • • K I .
4
/ ~ ~ ;.:1,~ • ,
. , Y ~ , .c~" ~ 1 • •
. x . r ~ ~ . ,
/ ~ ° , ~ h ~ ~ ' • . . ' ' ' ~ ~
• M N , ' `e/ t ' • ~rr
, ~ g ~ ~ ~ . ~ .
O , .
, 4 ,p , 9 , 0 a
. a
. . cD
. i - • .
. .
~ • , ~ ~ . . ~c
~ • ~ .,R~ ~ ~ . ~ .
L. , ~ p~ ~ ~t'
. , , t ♦ v ,
Q , o . .
S . . . N N
, _ .
\ ; a . 01 p • ~
DAr
• ~ ~ i.~...,~` • ~ ~ ' , ~ ~ • ~ 1
. • Ne ~ . o , a ~0 5
. Tu 8 tc ll •
~ . ~
~
,
~
~ ,a`r ~ ~ ' ~ P ,•0 ` . • '~Q~'~ • ~
~ ~ . . , ~ ' ~ . f.,d , ~ ~ ~ , ,>,.s • . y.~
. ~ o
~ 3~ • ~ f ~ ~ "
1'( t, c, . ,
i
. o N.
~ 47
s \ , , _ • .
• ~ ~ . O ,
Y ~ ' • ~
f r ~~r~ i ~ ~1f 4 ♦
-40> . . , . . , r- . . . a
O. in
& , ,;~I~ p
~ , I.lo
. ~ N. .
. ~ d . ~ ~ . 4 .
9 . . .
' ~ • , , ~ ' ~ ' ' •
. . , . . . p,
, • . , ~ ~ N / . e~ .
, . I
• a0 ,
. I
, , "'w. • ,
/ r
i • ~ , • ~M I.~
~ . ~l, ~~i 4. ~t ~ ~ . ' ~ I
. ~ ~ , ~ ' 1~ ~
CIiJ4lbP
r .
~ r~ , ~ . . ,
.
, .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING Ot~KRTMENT
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Certi fi cate of Exemption No. : Appl i cation No. :VF-18 3-9 4
Name of Appl i cant: Z-e,-5 7,'r~ ~ 7crs of'
- ~ .
Street Address: AO• 49ihN~'/~~ pi-ry~r
. ,
City: State: Zip Code: p7~~ Tele. No.:,~703-11y7
Name of Property Owner(s): 0~ K ba
CoM~
~
Requested Action(s) (Circle Appropriate Action):
C1Ld riance(s Conditional Use Permit Administrative Appeal .
Tempo ra ry Pe t~ ~ t, Wa -1 v,.-- r o f Y' ; a ~i c. n 0. `"e r~
Ze ro Lot Li ne Non-Confo rmi ng Lot/Use
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * ~ * ~ * * * * * * * ~ * ~ * * * * * *
FOR STAFF USE ONLY ePSBW ~
~ Ci te 0 rdi nance Secti on iz.o~(~ (3) , 20 ~ Flank~n ,~~rcc~ scfback reauirtNe_rt~
4.i7.035tc)- .Setb~ for certoDlts ~
~ Section ! 3 Township zs Range 43 Pro ert
y SizP: *
~
~ Existinq Zoning : JVlanesA- /ii?a Comprehensive Plan Designation: .Tndostyia1 ~
* ~ *
~ Legal- Checked by: Hearing Date: Receipt ~
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Existing Use of Property : Truch- 5~rv)cv 13PIC-4 -
Proposed Use of Property: c,
Street Address of Property: . 63oZ0 8i I"►' f~~~i9~c, Gl1,g~s1~.
J
~qqal Ges ~r' pti on of N rope riy k 'i nc i uue eus~~=-a ~ 1 16 ~rr? ~~~hi o 1 •
.3.
~J I S~ ~-Qµ~► ~J I7 - \ . • ~
J 1v. ~ .
~ Y,c~
~ Parcel ~J~~Source of Legal A-C
3 s ~c1s
~ Total -amount of ad,joining land control led by this owner/sponsor: /y~•~~
What interest do you hol d in the property:~,on~ /erhr `tv.s~, Nh~ o~o►74~ 6~14.6/9
►ti
Z[b~S c ~ AAVG GU/'f/S c 'f'~r Qbl-ho^' O~i9~'/1~ ~tvoy.
i -
Please list previous Planning Department actions involvina this property:
/7 0)i G
I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF REqQRD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE.
IF NOT T_dE OWNER, WRTTTEN PERMISSION FROM SAjD OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/
HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED.
I-e,5 ~tiw~6 Ti~ 67' -9911' _J_ ^C •
Si gned : Date : _1O-
Address : p a G~7 )41',1c,1i 6~vvn 97Z5/
Phorie No. . <;5-U T / ? a/r?V
~--C•~u--~
NOTAR`! SEAL : ~ NOTARY J.
DATE
,
N0T
~__r~_ ~_T-_- SH~? IEGW.
r~ ~~A~4~'_, •.~~~4,~_. , SITUS ADI~~?t5S E SPDKAraE-51ANDARD ~
13M-G1,05 1A %E t,'~S F 6306 At K i AVE CV40 tvlAtt & A[1QRESS r--•
~1~~E1~ 4.~~} rR ~EEU f lRf REGULAR TS EX yR`B~I~~ 62 ALICE J JUNES
~4 1-,a ~A „a~{~TOt+i 51 aA Et1 a CER1 94 1.0 ~ .Q~1 19ift.9~
SP~l~w'~ 99~~~. S ~ t .Di~ ,(?~1 .~'R3 3 ~~R REk~1C~ a •
tA~ ~ SE~G ~ 1 TS j
AREA 14403
iNE 1 ~SfCf"~S L0T
t_____ ~,',~.UE S '
,A RCRO,c 1 UIDTFf
• - SPE, 3 aL ~aS~Es~~ Nt DEPTH Larrao t~ROVED ~at~,
~r ~ T "~F YR C f ;1l F1 E C I14PAi rJ S OEL AtE,~ 38934 540+~fD ~ 1 ~~OO(~
, ACRES------ } DESIGNAiED WN) N ,
1~< ALL L015 b YHR4.P 1.3
tA51 5Al E pATEIPR I C(/tVJM8E RL-EGAL E SPOKANE-SIAND gD ~~1 ~~Q7TN~tUf c
~ 81 1NC VAG ALLEY O
P[P ~()NAL PROPERIY (YIN) N ,
l i k i~►f~tfRlifRfil~1~MRlR~~lf#~kl~^rt**~~t..!-++r
M 11 f 4 R l t i N * l f R f IY F 1
ftttl
•~~i.~~~~~tf Y 4 1 t r/ftf lf lfM1 „ 0 w er ~ f + •srl ~ l fa 0 # ~ i41kia F1 ~ Ylt f fff ~ R
• SHG~T ~E~G~L
c" 0 SiAi;~, - SIiII$ A~;~RESS - _ ~ ~pQKA1af a1AtdC7ARL~ ~
ta.x~LE E t220 AlKI ►~VE ~r~£~ r~A,~E ~ ~~~€55 * .
.4 t-., ~~C Y R -__PW~ ; Tax~~~--> YR WEE7 F 1'Rf ~iEGULAR TS fY B~ ~DG -
q
r{Fr~ a CEA~ Ac, 1.~~Q ou 319.2jCA~ YR BU~IyL J EHaL
A~jE .00 }•~U ~ ~11'l~+ "S n E
6.+ ' m•.~~~
r ' f 7 l ~ ~1 T(~~~ 3
~ JREA
~
L~3T
~~'~t~;. viQryifiH i t~ E- VA~~U~ES{~ I
L ~Y"~ i-~li'IS~i~•~i °-r ~~TP` i 1.68 LF4yUr AI"yf~l'S.VYLVT 0 T l /~Y
f.~RiZf~~~; APEA 1i4K 23000 23000
ACRES------ > DESI~tATEa (YlN) M
SALE CATE IPRICE/NUM6ER LEGAL E 5~~~~ANF S1qZARD Li-2-3-G 62 I~►C VAC 7f r STP ~[~f
g~~~.~
PERSONAi_ PROPERTY WNI N
k0 9 41 4119 t74#i~SlT#Rliil##~ifliftf+tlrirl~l0 9 a I* ftlly0 iiYlMt rYltfif T41#ffrrtf[rf+~fRetfarrifRt~~f1~*t#tt#tttff#t}YY~t4t~4t~ta R~tT#ftl=
*a------__a__ ;MORT LEGAI.
--t S'a~~.~ i;LM_i~~C"'* ~-_-_r___,._---- 5~'ol1S A;~GRESS E .iP4+KANE a1'A#~UAF'11"~
~ 1,~~_~; ~ +~1 ~ AlK I ~V~ ~a*
t~~µ ICA1I~r~N5 ---CUE5 1A$F~ .r- , YR WrED F iRE REG1JL4R' T5 EX BLGG C]dNER NNM 8 ADDRE55
~EE "I tf (ER1 8G .00 235.19 YR BuILt 5W132ER CCt'V. Itvr
,
p ' , PG 1.0c .Q~1 235.19 p rR E h~'[+
1 + 4~V 4 ~ 14 ~i A lJ~+~ i 1~a
~ G 5~ i1Faa~~~ g~ ~
~ -
-4 A ,1REA
~
VA~~~S
'
' . SaEC !Al. ASSE SS~'Fr,. _ - - W[~1T~i I ~
, pEPiH 126 LANU I''"~~OVED TQrA-
; ±c rEu7;r AftE" 11-10,66.0 17(}00 1T~',
ACRE v Dc 5 IGNAT E D 'v/N)
;7,`
r1:4 " ! ~rT +Try ' ~ I"i~ e
r+ r2~,~_~ ~1~~1E'='I~I c E~41 ;h~(i~~ ~
T -
,r'~~~; ~StEf,!~ ~~?~i? .
%~"f~ (Y/W N ~rarTrRrr~~4~.rrr~
tit►t.~eiat0 r11trair~IF 4 d~rt 11 0 ysw0 9 1 9~iitt4~t.1 0 6 0 0 01M0 tt91 ea 0 lirrf0 0 f9tff►~itra ql a rftlt, iY1t rF* ik\}*1AI I~r1#ffiY~Y ♦
.l1 LEVAL e'-_r.~--'---s-
f----,_`--'_ Sfl
SII~V.1 H;14'flC]S =__,a.s--:r: -f .r
r_«~_i~~-~~~-'~+~ L SPOK~E SINND'dQt'ihlr{D _ a.
, ,~~Ar~;~~ E b ~
'wG ~ED F l RE R'~ G+Jt AR T S Ex BL~1r f--- ~NE P $ Af)4Rf Sa
"~=~T~sIIC~1~:~~~ '-'(.1F~ ~a1t~'~-__;~ YR CD0 i~v~a6. ~i'0 rR E~+J ,~1 `~9 S~ii~ZEP C~ INC
{ ~ ~.~ctl ~.L~1 ~,~?C~ ,~{'i 1~36.q r1 YR R~1iQD
~ '~N'C~ 1732.18 A +.~NI T; I
~ -A'irt E r~+ -~~~4~~ 1708,64 A AREA 5000
~~'1
F'_~ ~ ar1~J ~Ij ~t!~ 2t~O t--------• V+~~l.1~S
.~t1 ~.;I` ~rrC r~{~~•' [~yf 1*1"~ Lr7 q ~1~ w1'4al I ~~E~ 101~. ~
rh' N i1»>)LJ 1 L
`r~ !Er, 1r, ~L A~EA 1870 T, 2 3aVI) 1170M 14±1C~'~', i
. ~c PE°~-==---a DE51fy~,fiE[i (YIN) N '
~
'~1~13 B~ T~►~ ~'A[ 14f~ 51~ ~If'
~";r SAIE Cr~TF/rrqICf/w4UMEEp f.Pfivo~rkf 51Ara~)Hc~Cl L ;
'9 0 `~9 t, I:~~: 2 5 1~) ` ~ ~
ra~~;' ; rl f XIIN} PJ
o ~
~
~1;f~M15 "'r~CEk 6Itii, U6i
P~f't(E , , .
- : • STA1I15 ~ut) AL, GtilS S
000` ;r,,~~~~ 135axDBL E O~z rr 415 iH1ERr,AN Rp EA51 SF'U;+tk PIN 0r- ik 19
AASiElrS 'r~M1:•S ---COA5 tAAi YR uEEL f jRE KEGIIIAA 1S EX BIDG 06A4Ek NMV g A.7DRESS
UM wAt DEEC a tEN( 8 4 t.("U .00 85?1.70 YR 6UI 11 60 1t+OBU'tN ( 9H-96fl
981.09 ()0 19•1 UNPG l;U .00 .00 3 YR RFMOD
LAST sE t. M UN(1S 1
iUl ' AREA 14225
NUTU.Mr,RI44 .A;RCRA,- 't~'i SS L01 --e
- - u1DTH - VAL UE S ~i
E~. ~ . •
' . DE P 1 H l AtvO 11'FROVE 0 101:,,
ARE/A 340 148000 ti 72000 6?~~('~ ,
ACI1[5------ > DES1GtwA 1E[ L u~1 SAIE DA1E/PRjCE/NUf"[if~ lE~~AI EAS~ ('Pf1Kl1,iF P1~; f iR 1Q V r) I' H'«~`l Ftii r ti`r'
k.~iWL PROPER I V (Y/N) tr
~ t f 1~ 1 1~! t r~ 11 r i 1~ e t~ r r~. r 1 t t ~1 1 r ~ ~ t ~ ~ 1~~ t t 1~ f t t~ 1 1 1 1 t11 1 1 If t r t t 1 .I. I I I t r/1 1 ..A r 1 t i... ...I I.
5 5 n~kt
~ ~33-~~04~ 1 q~~.E.:, 51'US At.-«t,~ L ,-as-r SP~Kar-~E S~;Y 45f 1
---uutS 1AxE'---> rR wfE G E
F1RE REGUTAR TS Ex BiDG Our R
~ 1 ~Ytr, QEED M (Eki 84 1.00 .00 664.08 YR 8UIL1 t ~E~•~
a'►~w~~ .a 91;2 11 02427 uhFD .UO .40 ' .OC 3 YR REI'1O(' to
lA p UNITS
700940 aREA
. CONTRA[1 COt4SiRUC1IGN LO1
SPFrItiL a; t<<<)MF ti1; a1D1N v aL 4 S
.r,r,. , `
~EPiH L AND I
;,REA 45900 46vQy%'N
;.CRE 5----•-> E:I
t~F~~tltc/N9.1"'16E; IEGAI E~+51 5P(iK;,',~ - , 1,5rT 1a , ,
4'7$1 50b82 242421 UAC 51P S OF $ A;.
-'ta5;jt.;,L PRpPERiY (y,'N) N
a 1t~ta flft/a tRtftii. . . . . .i. ..rt.r.ait.f. i. . . . . .
r:.~•:;. _ ~ ~Ci•. ~AUUkESS ~
T Il p . . n .,NUhT L~.uFiL
%.G.c 43 h S2l! G'rE; R r EaSi $POKFNE PT pF B19
L14"1S ~ NEAL ---1vE5 'Ae.E rR wEEJ F 1RE REGULAR iS EX BIDG OurvER tiAh'1( .
`~.tiUr r,E_~r~A ST ~~LJ a Cf+~i 81• 1.OU .00 7332.55 YR 8UlLT 77 R NEAL w1Ll1AJ"I~,
~PGKt,r~f w:. 99203 08001 .UO .00 3 vR REMOo
LAS1 SEG a Uv1T5 1
7103'9 AREA 160~~i1
L:,*.a ~,SE Aj10.MARlr+E.AIRCRaFIguCtE~'~l l01
SPFr;a~ "S'rSSME~~1' aIC1H vALUES
DEPiH LWVO 1"IPROVED TD
aREA 88500 171040 3r3000
ACRES------ > DtS1GhwIE7-,, cr,w ,
~AS~ ~M~t G+'.1EiPHiIE%'u~M~;ER ~E~HL EK~T SrUK.A~JE F'i Gf 819 PTr, rrwLr o~ HWY i~~C ~'A," 3v~1 c.
110274 125000 148005 N GF $ ADJ ExC pEG ZSB,SFT E riE w LN 619 TO '0e SN S37~[,f 'l '
.
PERSGt,N. Pk6PERTr (r/N) N BMiN E117,7FT 1H ^4f~t ALG PS~ N:' 2 R/.t 8 3 F T N4;'. ;N iEr;~; 1 1 f t ~ ~ t f f ~ f f 1 ~ t et * **f*f f!►~ t~~ 1 f *vvt t 1 t► t RffetI t f 1 f f&f f f a 1 f~ 2 to•~/ 1/•- r'HriiCL --6 a- STarUS -:00C-s r-------------- SITuS ADDkE55 SNpR1 LFr:41L
13533-4103 1AacreLf C,43 E 6320 AL Ki k,E E SPOKt%'rE-'-1c,NC~af<D
PQSTELL A J QwES jAZE;---> rR wEEG F lRE AEGULAR iS Ex BLCG (7~r4ER
. Y f 5.~ ~IR fENT DEED a tEAi 841 1,Op 3182.05 YR gulLT 6?
a~~ S 23900 C uWD .00 3 YR REMOD
80X 667 LA51 SEG a ~ UN;TS '
Pk1hE'dILIE GR 97754 aRE.a 1414'
~~D USE AUTO,MARINE.AIR(RAF 1aM:,'E~~ l0T
SPEr1M; aSSESSr^,~n1~, ------'~1DTM
, 10::E '~Pirk ;f~E~ EP1H LA14D 1MPk'i .t
J
';REA 43150 55000 175,'~~0
AtkES-f• > DESIGNAiEO ki,hi
L~~~ E J>>1f/P4 lL t%ti'MbrR LEGa1 E SPGKANf-SIANGAFtp LU15 11HRU4< LS EXt ullfl< l0i':
, 141NRU1$ B1 EXf F~WY Qf LOTS 191$< 1Nf YA( ALlE1' LYG N OFgA;1
.PER~a~A, PH~.aF- + V( v1N) N IOTS 14 1NRU 18 t1Nf N1/2 pF VACS1 S Of & Apj
A
~ • ; + P~- " ' • ` ~ ~ C~ t"•' i ? t ' 4 . ,t' • ' 1.11'v~U""'ti„' _
~
.
~ ' • ~ • ' Y
. l ~
E t. i963 e wl~ ~ -~1
a .
trcw:.~ E F ON
;1 pFF)GE NOF
,
E . . . ~
~ ~ _ r . ' - • 7
~ ~ ~ • • ~ ^
~ ^ + ! 1 • ~ . . Q ' M at f. • .1
1 '
~ •i , l . ~ . J
i • ~ ~ . ~ ,`~r : ~ , Q ~
0
• W ;
. ct ~ ~ ^ ~ 0~
L ~ I V !
~ta•' ~W.Y..~~~.~,. t~.." Q
P i W ONE1
, m •
r - v.► . ~
wET « .r
~ , ~~U~ ~ I'•, ~
• DESMET ~ •.3~
• i ^ I ' , .
A = ! ~ M~ - : i
~ t ' .
N I Y , .
n
w A
J . -
0 P ~ a 90
0 J i.
A 1( , • ~ ^ ~ •
H•~C~
IYAEr J►A ~
' ~ ~ ~ ,
_
~ psaa: •
a VEm 83 84
~
R R J
d N rt/ AIlP R1 - - - • - - - - . - - - ' ~ - - - _ . ' - _ a r ~ d q s_
- f,RAGV E. AVE,
l~ ~ \ • . - - ' • "'!r
.J
cr ~
~ ~ . _ .
~ y a
2
gr
T1 N~'iA 'rr y ~ 'l
S~h;.
u A. aal~_ w
~ 59 ~0) Zi . TN t
~ 3 ~ a , W. .
I 1~1000 S.
~ Q
0 Y TH F-
~
W~~fl~tR v T u ~ ~ J
~ L - c►...
~ -
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR - PUBLIC HEARING TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205
AGENDA: MARCH 13', 198b
TIME: 1:15 P.M.
PLACE: Spok-ane County P1 anning Department, N. 721 Jefferson St. , 211d floor hearing room ~
A. VARIANCES (Continued)
3. VE-183-84 RELAXATION OF FLANKING STREET SETBACK AND SETBACK
REQUIREMENT FOR CANOPIES
enerafly located^between Eastern and Dyer Roads,
south of A1 ki Avenue and north of Ol i ve Street
(vacated) in Section 13-25-43.
PROPOSAL: To al low a vari ance from Sections
4.12. 040 (3) and 4.17.035 (c) of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance whi ch
requi re a canopy to maintain a 10 foot
setback from the fl anking street
p mpe rty 1 i ne. The appl i cant p ropos es
to locate the canopy beyond the
fl ankirig street property 1 ine and
irito a parcel of 1 and leased from the
Washington State Department of
Transportation.
SITE SIZE: 14,400 sq. ft. (approx. )
APPLICANT: Les Schwab Ti re Ceiiter
4. VE-217-84 A-C RELAXATION OF FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT
General ly located west of Frui t Ni11 Road in the
SW 1/4 of Secti on 33-26-44.
PROPOSAL: To al low a single fami ly resi dence to
be 1 ocated on each of the parcel s, al l
of whi ch have no county road frontage.
Secti on 4.04.040 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requi res 100 feet of
conti nuous publ i c road frontage i n
the Agri cul tu ral Zone. Access i s by
means of a 50 foot and 20 foot wi de
easement road extending westerly to
the si tes from Frui t Hi 11 Road.
SITE SIZE: 3 five-acre parcels (15 acres total)
APPL I CANT : Ron Van Damme
5. VW-12-85 RELAXATION OF FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT
Generally located south of Thorpe Road in the NE
1/4 of Section 2-24-40.
PROPOSAL: To al 1 ow a si iigl e fami 1y resi dence to
be 1 ocated on a parcel of 1 arid havi ng
rio county road frontage, whereas
Section 4.04.040 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requi res 100 feet of
conti nuous publ i c road f rnntage i n the
Agri cul tu ral Zone. Access i s by means
of a 40 foot wi de easement road extent'-
ing I,-o-,- site.
SITE SIZE:
APPLICW: RObert dtld i-!unm,3 ~uii►~~~r-2-
z z : i
_
_ - - -z
g n
t
_ _ _
_