VE-187-84
, - . RECEIVED
ZONING ADJUSTOR f~OV 0 1 1984
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
SP_OKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
IN THE MATTER OF H& S CONSTRUCTION) FINDINGS OF FACT,
' RELAXATION OF REAR YARD SET'BACK REQUIREMENT ) DECISION AND CONDITIONS
TH IS MATTER, Bei n g the consi de rati on by the Zon i rig Ad,j usto r of Spokane
County, in hearing application VE-187-84, hereinafter referred to as the
"Proposal", and the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County having held a public
hearing on October 24, 1984 and having ful ly consi dered all testimony
presented thereat, and further having visited the site and vicinity in
question, and having rendered a decisiori on the 31st day of October, 1984,
APPROV ING the p ropos al , does he reby make the fol 1 owi ng:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is generally located north and acjacent Boone
Avenue, west of Stanley Street and east of Yardley Street in Section 14-25-43.
Parcel #14531-0902 and 0906.
2. That the proposal consists of locating a warehouse building five (5)
feet from the rear property line whereas the Spokane County Zoning Ordina►ice
requi res a 15 foot rear yard setback in the Manufacturing zone.
3. That the adopted Spokane County General ized Comprehensive Land Use
Pl an i ridi cates Iridustri al usage of the area encorrpassed by the proposal. That
the proposal geiierally does conform to the density and use guidelines of the
County Land Use P1 an.
4. That the si te i s zoned Manufacturi rig whi ch woul d al l ow thi s use upon
approval of this appl i cati on.
5. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include generally
industri al uses wi th one occupied resi dence to the rear of the proposal and
also a boarded ua rzsidznce to the mar of the proposai.
6. That the proposal will allow adequate room for large trucks to access
the proposed new structure which would otherwise not be possible if the
standard setbacks were maintained due to the existerice of a garage at the front
of the property acjoining Boone Avenue.
~
7. That to maintain the requi red setback woul d not serve any useful
purpose and would result in the inability to use the property in a manner for
whi ch i t i s 1 awful ly zoned.
8. That th.e proposed site plan indicates that all other setbacks, parking,
hei ght of the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.
9. That no one appeared to oppose the p ropos al nor we re any wri tten
comments adverse to the proposal recei ved.
10. Th at the p rope r 1 egal req ui rements fo r adve rti s i ng of ~the hea ri n g be-
fore the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have beeri met. CONCLUSION
Following review of the Planning Department file, consideration of the
publ i c testi mony, and ci rcumstances i ri the area of proposal , the Zoni ng
Adjustor concl udes that the proposal is not detrimental and is compatible to
the publ i c heal th , safety and wel fare.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings, the Zoning Adjustor hereby in APPROVING the
proposal, establ ishes the following condi tions:
. . . conti nued
E
~
a .
. •
FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION AND CONDITIONS VE-187-84 PAGE 2
CONDITIONS OF APPROUAL
1) Prior to bui 1 ding permi t release the appl i cant shall provi de the Spokane
County Planning Department and Spokane County Engineers Department with
a detai 1 ed pl an showi ng adequate parki ng stal 1 s on the si te and that the
requi rements of the 208 Stormwater run-off are complied with.
2) The Owner(s) and Successor(s) in interest agree to authoriie the County
to place thei r name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by
petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 whi ch the petition incl udes the
Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest
petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to
RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection
to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called
for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or
resol ution method under RCW Chapter 36.94.
3) The structure shal l be doubl e pl umbed for connection to future area-wi de
col 1 ecti on systems i f addi tional sewage faci 1 i ti es are i nstal 1 ed.
4) The appl i cant comply wi th Section 504 of the Uni form Bui 1 di ng Code th rough
the Spokane County Bui 1 ding and Safety Department.
5) Subject to speci fi c appl i cation approval and issuance of permi ts by the
Heal th Offi cer, the use of an indi vi dual on-si te sewage system may be
autho ri zed.
6) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
7) Water servi ce shall be by an existing publi c water supply when approved
by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and
He al th Se rvi ces . DATED TH IS 31 st DAY OF October , 1984.
~
DOUGLAS ADAMS, ZONING ADJUSTOR
SPOKANE UNTY, WASHINGTON
NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10)
DAYS OF THIS DATE.
,