WVE-2-81 ~
23-2s`4L3
~
BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF
P I
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE fVIATTER OF REVIEWING THE
ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION OF THE )
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR ) FINDINGS & ORDER
IN A DECISION FOR APPLICATION # )
WVE-2-81 (CUE-8-72 & SPE-1-72) )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of Adjustment
for Spokane County, is for the purpose of reviewing and setting forth
development standards for fihe below described mobile home park, hereina-Fter
referred to as the "Proposal", and the Board of Adjustment of Spokane
County having held a public hearing on April 19, 1952, and having fully
considered all testimony presented thereat, and having rendered a decision
on the 19fih day of April, 1982, approving said proposal, does hereby make
the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Thafi the proposal is generally located between Fancher Road
and Howe Street and adjacent to and south of 4fih Avenue.
2. That the proposal consists of considering requested modiFica'tions
to a mobile home park approved under Zoning Adjustor File No. SPE-1-72
and CUE-8-72.
3. That the Generalized Comprehensive Plan for Spckane County
indicates Urban Designation for the area encompassed by this proposal.
4. That the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor held a public
hearing on June 24, 1981, concerning the proposal and further deliberations
were necessary to establish development criteria for the park.
5. That the exisfiing land uses in the area of proposal include
single family residences, a racquet club, mobile home park, and undeveloped
land.
6. That the proposal is compatible with existing uses in the
area.
7. That the proposal as agreed upon is not detrimental or otherwise
harmful to the public heal-th, safety and welfare.
8. That the proposal as agreed upon is consistent with the
surrounding land use classifications and does not grant a special privilege or
rights to the applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property
owners. _
+
_ . . , .
FINDINGS AND ORDER #WVE-2-81 2
9. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the
hearing before the Spokane County Board of Adjustment have been met.
10. The standard residence and mobile home #8 located on the
south property line are in violation of setback standards. •
11. That the land use immediatedly south of the standard residence
referred to in Finding of Fact #10 above, is a swimming pool.
From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department
Staff Report dated April 19, 1982, and the Staff presentation o-F File No.
WVE-2-81, the Board of Adjustment of Spokane County hereby in approving
the proposal does make the following conditions:
1. Adopts the Conditions ofi the Spokane County Engineer's Department
dated April 16, 1982 which reads as follows:
The owner record a document with fihe Spokane County Auditor to
the effect:
a) That the 15 accesses which presently exist will be reduced in
number to six (6) by the owner a-t such time as SpoE<ane
County desires to undertake a Road Project on 4th Avenue.
b) The owner agrees that should an application be made for a
change in Land use or zone changes on the property that the
accessess will be reduced in number to three (3).
c) That the owner, heirs, grantees and assigns agree to join in
and not oppose or protest the formation of a County Road
Improvement District or County Road Project on Fancher Road
or 4th Avenue.
d) The County Engineer will prepare the above referenced
document for signature by the applicant and others having an
interest in the property.
2. That the interior streets as shown on the site plan between Fancher
Road and Howe Street shall be paved to a minimum width of 25 feet
tivithin 150 days of the date of the signing of this Order.
3. The applicant shall submit a Final Survey Plan of the site tivith
signed memoranda by the surveyor that all units fronting on 4th
Avenue meet the minimum setback requirements required by the
Residential Mobile Home Zone.
BOA1-N
s
. . '
FINDINGS AND ORDEF #WVE-2-81 3
4. That in the event the existing residence referred to an the south
boundary of the property is removed, the site plan is to be considered
amendedwithout application for the purpose of siting one mobile
home on that site. Such mobile home would have to meet the
minimum requirements of the Residential Mobile Home Zone.
5. That two waivers of violation for residentiat sefibacks on the south
property line areapproved (for the standard residence and mobile
home #8 ) .
6. That the preliminary site pfan as referenced by the Board of
Adjustment be approved which would include those mobile homes
and residence not within the original conditional use permit. (Units
25 t0 34 on the preliminary site plan).
7. That all new residences sited on the property shall conform to the
requirements of the Residentiai Mobile Home zone frorn the date of
this Order.
Board Vote: 4-0
f
`2- , 1982.
DATED This day of
SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, H,.'GTQN
Martin Hibb`s, Chairman
Larr Krause
,
Mila Btall
-c L c-
Vernon LaUbach
BOA1-N
0
,
~
NOTICE OF f'UQLIC HEARINri • Qefore the Boat-d of /ldjustment
Spokane County, l4asfiinaton
. •
IN THE MATTER OF : HEARIfdG DATE .
APPLICANT : Ron Presta ) M0NDAY , Aori 1 19, 19Q2 9:00 a.m.
c/o John Sweitzer )
500 Col uilibi a al dq. } . N. 721 Jeffe•rson, Broadi•tay Centre Bl dq .
} 2nd floor, Conference Room
. FILE NUMQER: WUE-2-81 and Clianae of }
Conditions for File # ) Any interested persons may appear before
CUE-8-72 & SPE-1-72 ) the Board of Adjiastmcnt
)
REQUEST: t-yaiver of Violation and )
Chanqe -of Conditions . ) )
ZONE CLASSIFICATION: Residential ) .
Mob i 1 e Ntiome
) .
COUNTY CODE : 4.05A.070 (c ) and ) 4.25.030 (f)
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The above referenced fi l e wi l l be heard before the f3oard of Ad,)USi,111e11t t0 resol ve
the i ssues of 1) establ i shi nq a f i nn pavi nq schedul e for the i nteri or dri ves of
. the Fark and Fancner Road; 2) resolve th'e issue of setback violations at the
. southern end of the property throuqh the i ssuance of waivers of vi ol ati on and/or
corrections of the setback p}-oblems; 3) consider a chanqe of concitions to allow
1 imi ted access for mobi 1 e homes off of 4th Avenue i n confonliance wi tn County
Enaineerinq standards; and 4) consider waivers oil violation for the establish-,
ment of mobile h0111C'S not within the initial coiiditional use approval. ADDIT IONAL INFORMAT ION
Contact: Saokane County Planninq Denartment Telephone No.: 456-2205
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section 23, Townshio 25, Ranqe 43 Parcel 23531-1101, 1102, 1103, 1104, .
• 23531-1147, 1106, 1107, 114S
Site Size : Approxiniately 2.49 acres
,
A complete leqa1 description of the above referenced property is on file at the
Spokane County Planninq Department for review.
f
. ,
. o . G T ~~~I ~ . • : 71,
" ' ~ ~ ~ • OESME?
~?l:;,' , ' ' ~o ~ ~ b • ' -
- -Y ~ L~.►~ r ~ r'•~~°~•;e ~i~ ; '
n F A ~4 ,r r
' • • ~ ~ ~ < • . • P~P~,,.
',R OWAY Av E } . R ;I G . .
, wn c I 3
.
. ~ ; Z • ~ P f f a
90
Q- 1 A
~ L,KI ~ O
~t
~ H.
1 Q ~ . O
~ ~ ~ ~ l.! . , ~ ' . • ,
~ •'~~~.EY w^Y ' ~ .
Va_'o . ~ ' .f .
. ~ / ~ 8 , • ' . t . .
~ ~ ' . i • ~ ~ , . ~ . . ,
c.cc MiXn`.~fl.~ • ~ MA11~{
c.~i .
p, w-f,c.wACvKBe~ ST. PAUL
~ ' 3 ~ ` •
~ W' RIVEftSIDE
936' o. W.R a. ~ rLy
- - - - ~ 4".~ ~ - ~ P R .o. G
~ . ~L,; •I 1 ~ . . ~ ~ ,
t ' S= ~ . ~ ~ •..'•--:-1 ~ _ ~ tsT a Z `
• • ' U ~ FIItt7 AvE ~ ~ .
i Z - ~ ~ , ' ~ o ~ p7 •
XJ
. ~ ~ _ ~ Ui' _ .
U ` R E W °
2, T1H`A -~7H
,~~r L
~
" ? ~ 59 G7 (it 6 Z .
~ • _ "Q 3 ~ d►
o , , .
~ Fi le Number. WVE 2-81 and Chanqe of
a~Conditians for CUE-0-72 & SPE-1-72
Uaiver of Violation ancJ *a ~
Th •Z Request: ~
Y Ctianae of Condi ti ons
' --J ~ ~ . ~ •p I r,~ ~ c.w ru.v
- , t dT~,~~ 23 , . ' ~7! T• ~,j r11 p ~j Ca
~ • ~ ~ ' 4t~ :1 ~
~ A~o hoo► • r' ~ -
' . W ~IOTH
j ~'1 ~ • . t ~ a~.~ . . . . . ~ . _ . . '`y.~
~ v ,F LL 1
. Z ~ I ITN
, ~ • Q ~ .~•c,_, :
' LA e ' 12TH 0~ aj (
. I Z T K A.v F- I 2 T N ~ ~ .
• ` ' --.4
44 Wt~ ~ ~
LLJ
~ .
~p3rx i 7H
° ~
cr p- w _
r
T N Z f. ~ T N
~ " ~~t"~ ' ~ Z z MI C~ "-'A ~ •I~i ~ ~ ~ • } ~
T H
lfT►r j
e - ~ • Y ~ T
~ ~ 3 .
hT ►-A N . . . , , •~-.~=*-r. . . . P= - v ~ T
, I1rcr~ Q tt
. . - r(j,~a ~ Z ~ ~ ' • • • " ■ ' +~L ' T ' ~ `
~ ro ' ~ w ( • 1 ~ ~ -
G~N OS Q = a 10 0 0f
~Q
z
F ~ ~ r' 7w ry I►J , 4+ ~ - - - - - - - ` '
, . i:- ~~i~~CT 7Q • 41 , .
, ~
•
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dote , 19 _
Inter-office Communication
To from
Subject . , _
~ si.x (6) hp the owner at such timG
-~,-ise ar protest the fotmatian of 8Countq Road I~Apr~~•~+~~nt -lacy Road °roject on Fancher Raad or 4th Avenue
~-junry Lngineer wilt prepare the ebove referencea . r- l_ . , 1 t - . r . -1 . ~ - . t_ ~a . . ~ . - { _ t . . f • -
.
► '
. ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~`~~Y ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~
x ' ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ • i' . : Y , . _ '.l +
I•
~
~ ?r`'!' ~ ~ i " l~J
~a,'` S~ i { 6 ~ ~iY+ "_"iti~a'-,y- .
: ~ ' A( s
~ _ _ ,F.,~.:1ri E Na;r+I N GT!. .
March 2, 1982
~ h1r, f=;on F resta
S. 1719 Upper• Terrac.e Rd.
Spokane, WA 99203
RE: In the rnatter of considerinct a Chanqe of Conditions and 4Jaiver-s of Violation I
in the developrnent of the mobile home park, WVE-2-81 (SPE-1-72 & CUE-8-72)
Dear, Mr. Presta :
The above listed mobile home park will be considered by the Spokane County
Goar-d of NJj us tment on Apr°i 1 5, 19°2 to resol ve the fol 1 ovri n(i matters :
1) Establish a tirni pavinq schedule for the interior- drives 0- the nark
and Fancher a2oad;
2) Resol ve sethack viol ations at ttie southet°n end of the nropert_y throuqh
the issuance of waivers of violation and/or correction of the setback
proh 1 efns ;
Pr-ov i cie a e:hange of condi ti ons to a 11 ow 1 irii ted access for mobi le honles
off of 4th Avenue i n conformance wi th Count.y Enqi neeri nq s tandards ; and
4) ~onsider waivers of violation for the establishrnent of mobile homes not
within the initial conditional use approval.
If you should have any questions on this matter, n1PaSp feel -rree tn c.ontact
me ar 456-22n5.
Si erel y,
~
'Oouq 1 a S. Adams
Zoninq Admini5trator . - . - ~ -
.
flure : The heari n,i is sclieduled for Apri 119g2 at 9 a.m.
C(: : J0h11 ~)YJE'1 tZeT'
/
_ ~
: Tr~ r • ~ 4~ , ` , Y~ ~i'~
f ~
A;,. •
- k , ♦ - i.. i ? ~i
i.. ~ j f~,•~nt.., ~ • ~ _,i , i , " .t . 4:'v.'~2 ~ '.3~
? Y y .j~~,. Y '~.!1^ ~ ~ ~
t(,
+A: • T!r ~ . ' ~ • ~y„'!• , '`~1.,I,~'1 ; : = i
.~Yil~ . ~ ' ~ - i „~t ~ 1~•. . , ~ ~ i,•,
i'
~ ~ , • . ~ "11~ ~ ~ . ~ ' r~
•r~,*t . y, ~ +•c;'
f ~ 1 ~ ' r ~ ~ . ~ ~ • ,~7` Wf's
r ~ ~ ~ , . ♦ . ~"I~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ $ ~
. ~r
~
7
~ . A.
~~4
• w .s ..s ~ ~ .
~ ~ . S'►' r "n~ C~
1Y ~
~ ji'.4~ ~ . ~ ~ •f
~ t ' ,
• .r~+ ~ ~
r . ~ ~ ~ i
• i/" ~ ~,j, ~ 1r.ti;.,_. , 40
~j ~ t ~ ~ s~~ ~ , ~ r , ~F.~ ~ ~ '
• • ~ 1 , ti , ? ~
1 ~ ~ .c i
~ ~ > , ~ i' • Y ~'°+tti)r~~ ~.Ty+',S ~S t~ ~ t
~ ^ ; ' ~ ~ ' ,+~k,+;s -
~ ~ . . y~ ♦ • • ~ .'w A~ ' , r, t _ ~
- . ' + i `y~ ~4^ •r A 5 ~ 1 a . ~s 1'~yr., ..fj
~ ~ ' • I
,
A~=
+i - : 'r ti '
♦ ''~,s; ~~~4,~.~ t •1~;~'~~y',~.~,
, ` r• x~.~~ ~f{ •i, ~ ~~~r »_,l
i ` ~'i`,~.3 ~ ~
_ nrs"'''v ~ , 9 ~~g~,l',~'#+4d~? ~3"' ? .
. ,~i. ' ~ i ; .~L j ' 4 ' ij °•~.i 1 i' ~ ~'t ~
_ - ~ e•
,
Z,
.d~
~ . r.
~ ~ t • 1~ ' ~
t ~ . h Jf~-' i`' € + ' ~i • r'`! _ y ~ s++ti •
~4~::,~ ,~:,'-~`a~s~"~ !j, r'' si•~~,y~ .,,'~r;
t ~ . x+ rA r ~ •
.I • . S'i
A4 ' ' rt+~ 1
~ . ~pr4~f1R, . _ Y
~ ~ ~
4 •
. . . ~
• - s. ~ ,
?itf . : . , . -
~ '.51~` J,sf~ ~ ' . • 1:~ - . ' ~ _ _ s~ , ti_ - .
a ' - ~
~
v-
a
.A ,y .
~ ~ . ti ~ ~t' a, i. , • x
~ . ' • - • - -
~ J, ~n ^ [ . ,1,v _ ,_-d_~ 1i.. -~jn•• . . _ .
~r ° ` a,~y`.,-
. ,
. s•~ r y t . ~'-.y . - - -
~ •
,
, • ~
~ ' ~ _
~ ~ ! ~ i~`S'. y~ . - • - - - . ' i"'~#~
1►~is
f ~ r;• ~
;
• ~
r
M
OFFICE OF COUN T YENG INEER
.
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
oore June 19 i$l.
Iitter-offit• Communicoiion
To Spokane County Zoning Ad,iustor
from Spokdne County Enqineer _
Subj*cr EnQ ineer Cond it ians for Aqenda items schedul ed for hear ing June 24? 1981 The following conditions are offered for your consideration:
CUN 17-81 that the approach to Strong Road shall be improved in accordance with
thP provisians of Board of County Cornmissioners Rpsolut ion No. 80-1592
aS "Ptira1 Rn.-&, ?nr1 D►- iveway Ar,pr~~ ~ch.~s" .
, _
~ WyF 2-81 Ch-: O1 Ci)Tl'j 1 t]7f~ ~i~i'- 5-7 ~
Fourth Avenue is designated as 3 secondary arter ial and wi i 1 in the
future be accommodat i ng substant i al vol umes of traff ic. a re1 axat ion
of the setback requirPments to 14 feet provides just enough space for
parking a standard size vehicle. It is possible that parked vehicles
will extend into the riqht-of-way if they are not pulled all the way
into parking stalls.
Driveway approaches are not adequately separated (35 fezt on center).
Having 15 approaches in a distance of approximately 540 feet along a
secondary arterial creates a hazardous situation vrhich cannot be ap-
proved by the County Enqineer.
It is this department's recomnendation that the reauest be denied. If
an alternate plan for the development of the property is proposed, the
applicant should consider serving the project by an internal rvadway
system.
,
. + -
BFFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTQR OF
• SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTt.R OF:
RON PRESTA } DECISION
REQUEST: Change of Conditio►is ) (Cnange of Condition)
(Fi1e N0, CUE-8-72) } NOTICE OF WITHDRAUIL
Waiver of Violation ) (UJaiver of Violation)
(Front yard setback) )
FILE NUMBER: U!VE-2-81
CUE-8-72
, PARCEL#: 23531-1101; 1102; 1103; 1104; 1147; 1106
DATE OF HEARING: June 24, 1981
DATE OF DECISIOV: July 15, 1981
REPRESENTEQ BY : John S~=jei tzer, Consul taiit
IfVTRODUCTION
This ►1iatter being the consideration by the Zoning Adjuszor for 5pokane
County and pursuant to Chapter 4.25, Section 4.25_010, the Zoning Adjustor
has the authority to hear and decide such matters coming before him. After
conducting apublic hearing to receive all public testimony and after revietnring
the public record and examining available information, the Zoning Adjustor in
accordance aJith Chapter 36.70.810 Revised Code of Washington and Section
4.25.030 of the Zoning Ordinance hereby makes the follotivina Findings of Fact
and Conclusions of Law hereinbelow stated.
The Applicant, Ron Presta, filed an application with the Planning
Department on April 21, 1981 requesting approval for a change of condition on
File CUE-8-72 and a waiver of violation for six mobile homes :~ihich are in
violation of the front yard setback requirement. The subject property is located
on Fourth Avenue in Section 23, Township 25, Range 43.
After receiving public testimony and accepting the file from the
Planning Department, the Zoning Adjustor set July 15, 1981, at 1:15 P.M. as the
time to announce the decision.
That on July 15, 1981, tne Zoning Adjustor having reviewed the
public testimony and having made a site inspection concluded there are sufficient
grounds to support this action.
. WVE-2-81 , CUE-8-72 '
Pag e 2 ' ' •
. fJOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL
That on July 13, 1981, the Applicant, Ron Presta, submiLted a
1 etter dated Jul y 13, 1981 to the Offi ce of the Zoni ng Adj ustor requesti ng
that hi s appl i cati on for fi 1 e!4VE-2-81 be t,-ji thdrawn from consi derati on; however,
that a decision regarding a change of conditions ta reduce the fence height be
rendered.
After consultation with the Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Civil
Division, the Zoning Adjustor vias advised that the request can be honored, and
therefore, no decision needs to be rendered regarding setback violations.
HOWEVER, it is the duty and responsibility of the Zoning Adjustor
to report probable violations of the Zoning Ordinance to the Zoning Investigator
for investigation and enforcement.
Af ter conclusion of the public hearing and accepting the file from the Planning Department, the Zoning Adjustor finds the following items are
apparently in violation of the County Zoning Ordinance:
1) Permit #CUE-8-72, Condition A.l. - failure to construct a
6 foot chain link fence on the south property line. (See Change
of Condition Decision stated hereinafter.)
2) Permit #'CUE-8-72, Condition A.S. - failure to pave parking areas
and driveways.
3) Permit #CUE-8-72, Condition A.6. - failure to develop the park
in substantial conformace to the approved plot plan. Reference
is made to that portion of the park located at the northeast
corner of Fancher Road and Fourth Avenue. The approved plot plan
r shows four mobile homes (one is replacing ari existing residence)
with parking and access to a driveway extending from Fancher. The
park as presently developed has four mobile homes including the
single-family residence which is being occupied. All of these
units are fronting along Fourth Avenue, and that parking is occurring
wi thi n the requi red front yard setback area resul ti ng i n a vi o-
lation of Section 4.17.062 (b)(5). The proposed access driveway
is not developed.
The Zoning Adjustor has made this interpretation in accordance
vlith Section 4.03.020 (56A) - Substantial Conformarice of the Zoning
Ordinance.
4) Permit #.CUE-8-72, several mobile homes located alonc the south
propcrty line may be in violation of the rear yard setback require-
men-t of five feet as currently required by the Zoning Ordinance.
(See Section 4.05A.050-2c.)
5) Mobile Home Park Expansion - permitted under Sectior, 4.05A.050
effective at the time of expansion. (See Zoning Ordinance -
dated July 1979.) Violations noted are:
a. No record of an approved plot plan as required pursuant to
I ~
IJUE-2-81 CUE-$-72
Page 3
Section 4.05A.050 (a) and Section 4.24.110. (See 4.24.110,b.8
• of the above referenced 1979 Zoning 0rdinance). b. Six mobile homes are located in violation of the front yard
setback from Fourth Avenue. A minimum of 25 feet from any
exi sti ng ri ght-of-way i s requi red pursuant to Secti on 4. 24.110. b. 5.
of the 1979 Zoning Ordinance. (This matter uras withdrawn from
consideration by the applicant.)
c. Parking is not being provided for in accordance with Sections
4.24.110 b.6 and 4.17.062 b.5 of the 1979 Zaning Ordinance.
d. Paving of parking areas have not been completed as required in
Section 4.24.110 b. 9 as specified in the 1979 Zoning Ordinance.
It is noted that the above noted standards are the same as specified
in the current Zoning Ordinance published in May 1981.
THEREFORE, IT IS THE ZONING ADJUSTOR'S ACTION that the matter of
4,1UE-2-81 whi ch was heard before thE Zoni ng Adj ustor on June 24, 1981, i s hereby
WITHDRAG!N WITHOUT PREJUDICE. FURTHERNIORE, a copy of thi s acti on i s bei ng fortivarded to the Department
of Building and Safety, Zoning Investigations, for further action.
CHANGE OF CONDITION
DECISION
TO DEivY THE REQUEST THAT CONDITION N0. 1 OF PERMIT CUE-8-72 QE
DELETED AND TO AMEND CONDITION N0. 1 TO READ:
"A chain link fence at least five (5) feet in height shall be
constructed along the south property line."
FINDINGS 0F FACT
1. The subject property received a conditional use permit on March 30, 1972,
to allot,,i an expansion of a mobile horTie park. As a condition of approval,
the Zoning Adjustor required that a six (6) foot fence shall be constructed
on the south property line. Currently the site does not contain a chain
link fence.
II. The subject property is now zoned Residential Mobile Home and tne adjacent
property to the south is also zoned Residential Mobile Home. Prior to
this zone classification the adjacent property was zoned Agricultural-
Suburban. Under the Agricultura1-Suburban zone, aninial keeping i1iay be
conducted on site in accordance with the zoning provisions. The record
shows that the adjacent property vias used for animal keeping at the time
tlie conditional use permit Uias issued. From on-site revievr, -the Zoning
Adjustor finds that this adjacent parcel is vacant and that animal keeping
is still evident.
j2
Page 4 . .
III. The Applicant's representative had testified that, after they had met
. tqi th the propert,y owner to the south, N1r. Bi 11 Hobbs, they vioul d 1 i ke '
to amend their request to seek approval of a four (4) foot chain link
fence. That Mr. Hobbs is i n agreement wi th thi s request. Further,
it was requested that the applicant be given a ane-year extension to
construct the fence. It was reported that there ►nay be some question
as to the location of the south property line.
TV. The file contains a letter from William Hobbs stating his concern
regarding the fence. The letter acicnowledged that thoroughbred horses
are using the pasture and, therefore, he is concer,ned with the safety
of children.
U. The opportunity was afforded at the hearing to interested parties to
testify in opposition to the applicant's request. Testimony vras received
from: Jack Johnson; Steven Nelson; Jo Ann Woltering; Roger Repp;
E. J. McCadam; and George Hunter. Also, letters of opposi-LLion are noted
in the file. Most of the testimony given related to the failure to bring
the mobile home park into compliance with the conditional use permit
and the standards prescribed in the Zoning Ordinance. Testimony was
given in support ofi requiring a fence along the south property line. In
addressing these concerns, as noted hereinabove, the Zoning Adjustor vrill
ref er the violations to the Zoning Investigator, and a fence will continue
to be required as a condition of approval for Permit No. CUE-8-72 as noted
above.
From these Findings of Fact, the Zoning Adjustor makes the following Conciusions
of Law.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. That the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County has jurisdiction over the
issuance of the building permit for the project to the applicant pursuant
to the provisions of Chapter 36.70.810 RCW and Section 4.25.030 of the
Spokane County Zoning Oi-dinance. That the applicant submitted an appli-
cation to tfie Planning Department requesting a public hearing before the
Zoning Adjustor, and that pursuant to Chapter 36.70.840 and Section 4.25.040
of the Zoning Ordinance, notice for a public hearing was given through the
Uni ted States mai 1 to al 1 property owners kqi t'ni n a radi us of 300 feet from
the subject property.
II. That all citizens notified and public agencies having jurisdiction kqere
afforded the opportunity to testify or subriit written comments on the
proposed project. No one appeared nor any wri tten commen-ts urere recei ved
in opposition.
III. The Zoning Adjustor concluded that a chain link fence is needed along the
south property line in order to prevent children from entering the pasture
v;there Iiorses are grazing. That it cannot be justified to change Condition
'l of Permit CUE-8-72; hovrever, it was successfully argued that a six (6)
foot fence was not necessary. The Zoning Adjustor accepted the testimony
from the appl i cant stati ng that Mr. Hobbs, who i s di rectly affected by thi s
action, is apparently in agreement with a fence height of at least four (4)
feet. Hoviever, the Zoning Adjustor concluded from Findings of Fact stated
• . ' 4JVE-2-81 , CliE-8-72 ~
Page 5 ' .
hereinabove that, in order to assure the public health, safety and ,
' general welfare, a fence of at least five (5) feet in height should be
constructed to prevent children from going into the pasture.
IU. In regard to the request that the applicant be giveii up to one year to
construct the fence, the Zoning Adjustor finds that this cannot be
granted. Based on these findi.ngs5 an attractive nuisance may exist
tirith the property to the south vrhereby an extension of time cannot be
justified. Furtner»iore, the requirement for a fence has been in effect
since March 30, 1972, and should have been constructed prior to the
occupancy of the park.
V. It is concluded that, in order to fulfill the conditional use requirements
in;posed by the Zoning Adjustor in his ti•rritten order dated March 30, 1972,
and to provide reasonable safeguards to neighborina properties, the Zoning
~ Adjustor is restating the conditions for approval as part of this action.
VI. It is further noted that under County Code Section 4.24.010 (b) permits
may be suspended or revoked after public hearing and a finding by the Zoning Adjustor that a permittee has failed to comply with sucn restriction5
or conditions.
That pursuant to these Fi ndi ngs of Fact and Concl usi ons af Law s t-ated
hereinabove, approval of this request and conditions imuosed can be sub-
stantiated.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
I. A chain link fence at least five (5) feet in height shall be constructed
along the south property line. Said fence shall be completed within
60 days from the date of this actian.
II. That all conditions of Order CUE-8-72 dated March 30, 1972, as amended
hereinabove shall be in compliance. The applicant is directed to contact
the Planning Department, Zoning Administrator, within ten days from the
date of this action in order to present an acceptable time schedule in which to complete the required conditions and to seek compliance with the
provisions ofi tne Zoning Ordinance regulating mobi1e home parks.
ENTERED THIS DAY OF JULY, 1981 PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY GRAUTED UNDER
THE SPOKANE COUNTY CODE, SECTION 4.25.030.
/
~
~
TNOMAS L.~ DAVIS
Z0NI NG ADJ USTOR . FOR
SPOKANE COUNTI', ~4ASHINGTON
e
ATTEST:
, -
Roil E Presta S. 1729 Upper Terrace Road
' Spolcane, Washin;ton 99203
(509) 455-9318
Ju ly 13, 1981
Spokane County Planning Dept.
Attention Mr. TOM DAVIS, Zonning Adjustor
721 N. Jefferson
Spokane, Wash.
Dear Mr Davis,
I hereby request the wa iver of vi ol ati on Fi 1 e rr WVE-2-81
" front yard setback from 4th. Ave. be WITHDRAWN but that
a dec i s i on be rendered for the c hange of cond i ti on for
CUE-8-72 and SPE-1-72 as it relates to the 6 ft. chain
1 i n k f ence and th e pav i ng .
I tal ked to Mr Bi 11 Nobbs , the property ovdner to the South
that borders thi s property and he said he would rather see
a lourer fence than 6 ft. , maybe 4 or 5 ft. he said 6 ft.
high would seem like a prison yard.
Sincerely,
~ Ron Presta "
, ~ ~ ~ga1 q~
P~P
acc ,
,
~ ~
i
+ . ~
1q • J, r' Y~
/J 7 ~O A
~
. 'N~
~ ` .
' BU ILDING CODES DEPARTMEN3'
• i i
• 3 ~ ~ . , ~ BUIY.DING--MECHAIVICAL-PLUMBING
811 North Jefferson Street - Spokane, Washington 99260
. a . . ~ ~'k.
Telephone: 456-3675
- . . . _ . . . JAMES L. MAN30N, Director
. , . ,
SPOKANQ COUI47Y COUR'f HOUSE
December 29, 1980 CERTIFiED - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED .
, Nis. Catherine 0'Sullivan, Manager ,
. Fox Ho11 ow U i 11 age East 5820 4th Avenue- .
Spokane, WA 99206 ,
, . - .
Dear Ms. 0'Sullivan: 7he laws and regulations in our society are, at times, difficult to under- , stand and fully comprehend. This is true of zoning ordinanceS, which are
laws intendedto protect and govern the many different uses of land in
Spokane County. It is my responsibility, as the Zoning Investigator, when
the situation arises, to help resolve cbnflicts involving the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance. This office has received reports regarding the recent expansion of Fox Holiow
Village. A check of the zoning map indicates that this expansion has taken place into a Residentia] Mobile Home Zone where mobile hpme parks are a
permitted use under Section 4.05A.050 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance,
which permits mobile home parks in conformance with Section 4.24.110 of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Please find enclQsed a copy of this Sec-
tion of the Ordinance. • ' With reference to number five of Section 4.24.110, a v3sual inspection indi
cates, we believe, that the mobile homes located along,Fourth Avenue are
possibly closer than the reauired 25' to the public right-of-way.
With reference to number eighf of Section 4.24.110, the Spokane County
Planning Department has indicated to this office that it has not received
a mobile home park plan. When such a plan is submitted, the Spokane County
Planning Department will also check to see if the mobile home park is in
compliance with the other requirements of Section 4.24.110.
r
~
,
4 ^
~
, s Page 2 ° December 29, 1980
. Ms. Catherine 0'Sullivan
Additionall,y, in March of 1972, Fox Hollow Village was granted conditional
use permits, number CUE-8-72 and SPE-1-72. Please find enclosed a copy of
the conditions of this conditional use permit.
~
A recent visual inspection by our field inspector indicates, we believe,
that the required "6 foot chain Iink fence" hdS yet to be constructed.
' Furthermore, 1t appears thdt "the pavinq of parking areas and dr.iveways"
has yet to be completed as required by conCition number five.
We are of the opinion that a period of 30 davs, beginning viith your receipt
of this letter, should be sufficient time for .you to submit the required
plan to the Spokane County Planning Department and to begin the nrocess of
bringing your mobile home park into compliance with Section 4.24.110 and
the condi'tions of conditional use permit number CUE-8-72, or to contact
this office in order that we might discuss this matter and the time frames
involved in bringing your property into compliance.
If you wish to discuss the$e findings, have any auestions, or believe these
allegations to be unfounded, please feel free to contact me at 456-3675.
Sincerely,
! ~ .
:V
Mark Holman
Zoning Investigator
MH:db Enclosures
a:
~
~
ti
~
- ,z:ootM.
c~ .
. • ~t, ~ ~,v.aQ~
. 'A s,k
~ .
v~..~.s ~R.~c~' o~~
~
. . . '
~
20~11NG ADJUS70R
MIKZ LES: March 30, 1972.
HEARTNG: FeLruary 7 e I972
$PZZC~AL AND COIN'DI't'IONAL USE Yr..ktMF1'
SPE--1-72~ E-vm.::r,slon of a Vzo7--conformina Lt~,o-
r£x onsien of aTrailer Cot~-t,
Zo►xir.g Adjustar Becisicn: Approvad, suh;aei to rzhe following cQnc,itiar3s:
Ao CONDI~~OYS;
1. 4 6fool. chain 1n:{ fgncs shall ba coasLrwz~f3d an tlze souih property L:..a,
2. 70% of raach trairor st-all shall ba Ieft in cpan spacea
3. Mini.mum spacing ci trailers s#.d8 by side shall be rot less than 20 fea2; and to
end snacimig shall nat be Ies sthan 20 feet.
4. AlIareas r:-cher iiian accas s anci egrea s a pai•king and c#rculation, and servic.e buitd-
lngs shall be cc:ip1~texIy a:~d parinanan-06iy landsc:ap`:da
S. Thd pav:nc of p:rking c?itd C;rlV+zDV'JnjrS o'hall be ir: ssbstanLial confo*mance to
tha sub:nWad osvlflg scheduls. i~. T=~e trai'ar caurt shall he dwmrelops(' in sul3sta:rtia1 canfarma:,ce to zhe approvee
ploz plart on iil~ 1, ith this applicatlon.
7. No aciditiona, tralier stalls shall be cnrtsfxucted to the t--es: of thc existing
traVers on th3 app:oveci plot plian.
B. aBj'EC^a ORS OF ~.L:CORD; C o u nOwens and wffa, 416 S. Howep Sp4kd?t6, 4'VashingLG.:
C o GE NERAL I)ATA: .
1. .I•ocatian: Sact±on 23o Township 25 N. , RangL 43, E,W.Mo
Th_s eas'L third of Lot I •ths east haif of Zot
ail oi T,Q=s 3 anci 4 o Bloc3c 11, Eastwood A,,Icition
Loca:ecl in Spokeng Cotuity, Wast-Ington,
Pares! No.: 23S34-1101 13 04~ I 106. ~y ~11017
2. Appliciant: Gary W. AsibLrl
415 S. HOL"J-e
SpOka►Le0 WashingfoLe
• (CO:'1Y: YIUsfl)
I
. .
Y . ~ i . ^ . .
SPE-~ 3-72 , Exransion caf a NIon--corfcrrrizz~ Usp .
of za 'T'raiFefi Goixt (contsnuc3d)
~
3 a 59te Si4e: Appro.%-dirzataty 2.49 acre~s
44 Ex-Istdizg Zoning: Lots 3 & 4 0Aqriculural S,~~burban n a s lZabli slied
Oell:obex 22, 1957; P.emaLndeE os propsatya Residentcial
M6Jbili~ ~~on3spestabl.iyheti August 13 0 1970.
S. Special k'ermi2 Reruesiod: xo pa-:mzi eXpol;Sian of an exfstfMg trazler court
within ~.ha- Agricultu+~-al SubtirLian portiom of Qh-a
oropo~:y.
6e Conditionai Use Pexmit '
I~squsstad: ~ ~~ermitttid to expard rhe 6xisit'ing trailer court
. in the Residential Mobite I-lome pactian of tYe
prore.ncra . ,
7. Applicatrvn of Zon'Lrag Provision: CnapE~r 4.25. 030vga C;hantsr 4e OSAa 090
,
C~~~S I.a HTUGGI~'~i~~Zt~n3.ng Adjuszor
,
NQT I C E QF Pi,~ IC HEnR zNr
. . . _r..
+ _ ' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i ~ ' Gefore the Zoi-i i 1i q 1ldjustor
County of Spokane
IN TNE MfITTER OF: NEARING DIITE
Applicant: Ron Presta )WCDNESDAY, JUNE 24, 1981 115 p.m.
c/o John Sweitzer )
500 Col umbi a Bl dq . ) N. 721 Jef fer-soii, aroa d,;ray Centre al dq.
Sookane, u1~1 99204 ) Hearinc~ Rooi1i, 2nd flooi-
. >
Fi lE Number: UJUE-2-81 and Chanqe of )
Conditions for CUE-8-72 & SPE-1-72
Request: !+laiver of Violation and a ) Any interested person may appear before
Chanqe of Conditions ) the Zoning Adjustor
)
)
)
Zone Classification: Residential Mobile)
Home )
Gounty Code: 4.05A.070 (c) and ) .
4.25.030 (f)
PROJCCT DESCRIPTION
The applicant is requesting aWaiver of Violation to allow six (6) mobile homes to
be located as close as 19 feet from Fourth Avenue. Fourth Avenue is the frontinq
street. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requi res a 25 foot front yard setback
from the existinq property line or 55 foot setback from the centerline of all road-
kqay ri aht of way, whi chever provi des the greater setback di stance from the roadway
right of way.
Also, the apnlicant is requestinq a chanae of condition for SPE-1-72 and CUE-8-72,
Findinqs dated March 30, 1972, condition #l. Anplicant 4dould like Condition #1 to
be deleted. This condition reads "A 6 foot chain link fence shall be constructed
on the s outh property 1 i ne" .
ADD IT I ONAL I PlFORM/1T IOP!
nlease contnct: Sqokane County Planning Dcpartnlent Teiephone Na: 456-2205
VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Section 23 Tovrnship 25 Range 43
. Parcel P, : 23531-1101; 1102;1103; 1104;
1147; 1106 and 1107 and 1148
Si te Si ze : Approxi matel,y 2.49 acres
$ ~ z
~ o~ ~ ! .
Al 1 of Lot 1, Lot 2 excent the 4J 165 ft.
toqether wi th al 1 of Lots 3& 4, 61 k 11
, ~
of East~rood Addition as sho~~n by plat on
y
__.r file in Vol. l, nage 29 of plats in the
p_+..~.__ - Offi ce of the Spokane County Audi tor.
GNI CAGO1 ~ c. Wk 5 B$ -ST. p'oIJL ~ PAC_ R. R.
ofl .
_I o.~R a ~ RR~ _ - • -
:1- - " . - - ~„t _ - - - _ ~ ; _ _ .
-ti~ r^. ~ ~ • ` G. .
.CAI
•
I•.
E.
~ ST S 'S•.
E
v , , • : ~ `
`T H
/Q Y
• la l !'o 'L Z
1i
~ ~ ~
fz ` y LL
V 7T N
~ ' Z ,Q • 0
T 4 1~i
H
_ 10 0 0
~r';~'.. --r;~'~';~'
23
7
SC%LL; Ii4=4.00 ~ 0
i `
- ~ ~ t+1
p
0. W fr? R. &,N C-o
a ~ ~
14
~ b C~! - t .
a ~
- .
-Jr
, PC7AD N(3. 2311 °f4'E N 4'` ,f~?? a
6
- - - - - - - - ~ ~ I~ ~ -
- - t T
~f~.~~~
c~ r s : ► ~ ' I ~YOKANE CoU TY RD W
.
i i r~ ;
~L3
y _ r , ~ A.~ y l f
~ . . ~ ' 1. ✓
~ R v l
9 &V r~ Fr ~ ~
,t I! i a `t ~
fe aae b= m ~e
' T f !T ~
~
~ ~~1~.. ~ ^ _ A' ` 6 i ~ ~ ~ ~A ~ .f ~ ~ ~ gd . *,I .
~ 1 . . a 2p ~ 7 4 ~ ; ~ ~
• ~
A ~17 ~ R . itl I '7 1 ~ . . ! k ~t,
r P
.
~ I
z
, .
• -
10.4
.
3
~r ~ ' _ _ - , f
I ~ . ~3
s,, i r
.
1. e s.
, •
_ t$ er
fTM
2
i 3 [ ~jVq 4070 i
V . ~,A. ~ . ~
- ~ { T T ~ ~ 1
F ~ c;,
~ , r+. / '
G7 ~~1'~ r ~ q '
I .T' ' /
~?4 T 4
- - ~ ~
~ ~ ► A 'lV '
~
~ ~ {
'EI 2 ,
I
•'rr + ~ 1 y i F ~ r ~ pt f 9 Y ~ THIR[) l14'E, ~c► 1~ ~
i
41
- f
.
.
._t. ' ~ . . ~ , . , .
~i .
~
~
~
~
it ~v ~ 1 ~ • i ~kJ ~ r ~
~ ~]c . - ' --t~
~L~-° { : ~ . ~ ~ , , , ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ r~ X I? ~ : ~ ~s
, • IYW -
-p . .
4 t .
, , +J ~ ~ 4► V , ,.J - E a W ' . r
~ o
_ i. r . I~«.. ~ ~o ,
•
._.Y_. . . . . . ~ - .y -
, ,
, ~
- - ~ ,
. _ . . _ .
r
~ S 1 ;.r - - 49w y ~L * *
yI.!
~
,
h
-
~ d'...
r~
~n. { ~9 4
R
0 ~'IF'~'Vi ,d111~. h~r.I$6,'-°~
U
~ ~ .
r
i
2 ~
"~y,~ ! Mwra~~ 4
I a _
-•.~~`yy. rl~I~ 47 .*si0 _~4 _ , ,
0
_
~'~1~!~
H 0 ~ -
0 4
t
s ~ r ~ .
Ir.E,~l~ f 11.~ % ~ ~'f7 0 7
I , z
~I f .
U)
i ~il
I ~
, ; -~y C3 r y g
- a -
p
1~.~~, f?~r I"F~J ~ ~ 0
~+7~y ~y
~'+'w' ~,r
~'JIll~ii J~ . . . 17 f~ ' u . _ ~ . s~ .1' ~ . . r o~ I.iL O~..,,K ~
p v I~ 9' , q
-
•
I
! I I~ ! f Y~ Z9
~ ' f " . P,-..'--s at 7 !r . r~Yr.~~ ~,y , ~ ,s 4-f~t- /C~ I 7'•~Od4 F. 4 .
-y
~ - . } • ~ ~ . . _ . ~ - _ .
e: ' x . ~
1~r
~
: - ~ - ~
0 ~ t~ - ~ J` •t`" ~ „ r
~rEVE~NTW . , ~ ~ . z
~ V
~ T~~
~ ~ . , . .
. • ~ ~ ~ • > "ha s~ . i~" f+~' H ' f, 's i ~ „
I
/ y P. J P
._'!.S
voi
r 1
11 t
.a+:1" ,I1k8 ~ f GT ~ ~I
' ~ • . p ~ ~ p , ~ ~ ~ , i~l,c' ~ ~ i ,
7 4 rr 0 a ~ I pr 5 ` ~ T~Fri4
`S
e 9 ; N - '2 9 9
_
k ~ !~f _
~~+~HT
. a`~~ •L ~1 kd' ~ ~ ~LJ~ - R' G,~ i . ~
~
w '
7 ~
09) 4.r7.'i. -9.+'~ 18
ROl '4 E. PR-0-rSTA
5. 1729 UPPER TraRF[.8.cE Fdo.
SPOrcaNE. wAS". 59203
,
I
I
I
I
. .
x: x m-..~..