VE-213-82
~ -z-
.
SPQKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR (Contiiiue(l)
;l;ENDk: JANUARY 5, 1983
1 :15 P.M.
3. VE-197-82 kELAXATION OF FRUPJT YARD SETBI',CK
(f;enerally located in the Snokane Valley, north
of 32nd Ave., and east of Avalon in Section
27-25-44).
(~+a~`Ge~s 7~ 31•
PROPOSAL: An addition to a sinqle family driellir),
to have a 15' front vard setback where
as the Spokane County Zonino OrdinancP
Section 4.05.110 (al) requires a 25
ft. setback.
' SITE SIZE: Approx. 12,000 sq. ft.
APPLICANT: La'rry and Sandra Johnson
4. VE-213-82 RELAXATION OF FLANKINr, Je%pokane TET SETBACK
(Generally located in Valley, north ot
Sharre Ave., east of Farr Road and west of Sunder-
land Road in Section 17-25-44).
PROPOSAL: To allow an apnroximatate 2' flankinq
street setback for a qaraqe (replacina
an existing qarage) whereas the Spokan(
County Zoninq Ordinance, Section
4.05.110 (0) requires a 20 ft. set-
back.
SITE SIZE: Approx. 10,400 sq. ft.
APPLICANT: Patrick Theil
5. VN-214-82 (A - F) TWELVE ROAD FRO~TAGE VARIANCES (6 under each
UN-215-$2 (A -F) application) (Generally located in northern
Spokane County, south of Bridqes Road, and east
of Sherman Rd. in Section 13-29-42).
PROPOSAL: To allow one single family dwellinn on
each of the 12 parcels, havinq no road frontaqe
whe reas the the Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance,
Section 4.13.020 requires 65 ft, of public road
frontage for each parcel. Access would be via two
private easements, each 60 ft. wide and extendinq
southerly from Bridqes Road to the sites.
SITE SIZE: Approx. 10 acres per parcel
APPLICANT: Robert Hermanson
- -
~ ,
Pv~
9
4~z
,i c+~ ~5yhb1S r
~ - na. ..Ne~~,
Ly'
CL ca,'Ea,
5/ - ~ ~ y c
u2+' ' . • i / , p ~ ...''Qy . ; .
7 nr+Ux N p
\4' Y-
PA~n V~ J ~Ho-NM(7N~ . ~ i
r .
~
. Z . y YJ ~ N RP
~
7
. l • , ~ ,~,.1,..--.~- ~ ' „n. r
Sv: -
a
K
L '
: ' ~ . .
. RP
.
E5f
. a a . , . .
.
@i
t~ 3 { .
55
2010 ~ O
~ 'S m
. ' 4 n 5r-h ~ -
• . . - .
SEC." 171 T N., R.44 E.W. M.
~
~ o OPPOR;TUN-ITY ~
Cor- lli 1~~ M15510N A4 ENUE ~ 3II~-~t-O:A~P' No. 51 W`- 60~ ~I
8 T 6 3 4 3 1
PO . ~ Z d 6
0 cJ} c,n ia m w l17 ia 19 ~-r ip xp ' rq
F~ 12 13 . tl• 9 ili~ 0
i9 ~G~ 7 d iG. is.
N 21 20 ~ ,Z g ~ ~ 13II
~ 22 23 O ~ 14 13
25 24 Q ~ . N
4 ~ p'4' S 17 16 I T °a_
~_~t N0 19,r>3 -40' T.F26 27. 7 rO 18 19 E.~~(~Io.ITBB'D~~e.66tE105A-'. ~
B
~ '~-'31NT0-18i8 ..9. °J wc~.6YI75
SinYO Rve.. 2 ~ 1,1 10 II 10 F2 I
~ ~Zm
13 ~ 12 13 W
, 3 .4 Q 0 3 -4 - JLL ~ : •.7'4; 21i a d
I'S 14 I'S 14 Z 3 •
- I- I 6I s . I . (,4z,.E}> , O
N 6 s, p a i-~~ii. ty• ~i b 0.'
, B dl ~ 6 ~7 i 6 ~-r T a' ~ Q i- a•~;' .s, m° w
~ p ~.10 9 ~HARP~ AVE-N~.I~ 10 9' O ~ ti 0 G.' JW
~ Y\ ~ I
14 IS 1617~T 16I1'S 14\I3
JROAZ) Nn 1413-4o'.7.a
~ . » . . A .
~NvI.B 8-50 *10.1788 Doa.GG19%7A~. O
~[..-i 3 2 / BOO E .CyE,
op
p
~t ` . I Z ' ~3 ( r4 ~ ~,`,a ' ~ • . . . ~ Q ~ ' . d'
! = 9Qa t:+`„i;i 3 ~I
c 5` -u a,,~~ f~7. , 56. o
~ +
110 :L
.
i 5h ' ~ Q 5
/ J ~ 7 ~ ~ . • . c 0 ~i ¢I-. ~ ~ p ' , ~ QM:J , • ~ e' ~!p
z 3 e 7 ~ 2
.~I°- 2 ~4; tli~e.'~:g LL . ~ . .
4 O
~ .
3 : • 3
G ~3 64.
0
' 4 I Z
V,
C.R.P. i4o9
or. ' : .BROAOW4Y '°7 A ENUE'7
I - - ' - . .
~
~s•
2~~~ .~!F's'•
~ s 4 3 ~ z: ~ • ~
z N
. z . ~
' r-~ ~z Ss r
97 0 ~ , 9
;
.
.i~.A r .
. • ~i9r~~ ~~?r~~ 9dl
~ ~ .
- ~ _ . ~ ~
- - ~ o~
>
a
~
,
grt~tG ~
~ ~ ewl ra.
- - ~ ~
-
` ~
_
~ i
w
. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
4 •
SPQKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
DafP 19
Inter-office Communicotion
Tl-
From `c~:l ml .~t T,~ t,,r j•~.
,
Subject
L - :U C.Oi1C1t_I1L5 CUIiCi'Ll:lllf:~ tlti5 a('~.'ll
No comment concerning this applica!:ior..
proach }?ermi.t must be obtained -rom the County Engineer i r: ,
'nd Avenue from the garage locatc' at the rear of the parc .
VP- 213-M 'iat this application be approved sub ject to the following c,. o i L;::,[; .
. That the existing garage as sliawn on the attached plot plan be r(
. That the proposed garage show- on the plot plan be situated on the
in the manner depicted on thE• ~-,lot plan.
. That the door openings of thr• ~roposed garage be orien?.
tion depicted on the attached ;lot plan.
it prior to place ment of t iproposed garage on the
icant shall verify with thc ~'ounty Fngineer the acceptability 01. L
.,ation, the building driveiv:_r and approach.
InrT-na.c1) nE r;-:ir must hc ol in(-d fron thr