VN-214-79 ' - - - ~ R
r , ~ ~ , t~
W ~ 'S
e
~i' i
~
At s aid t~me and pl ace any inte re sted person may appe ar f or, or ag ain s~, the granting o f ~ thi s applic ation . ~
. , , , , ~
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ~
Z~NiNG ADjUSTOR HE~RING TELEPHONE N0: 456-2274 ~
. ~ . ~
TIME; ~dednesday, January 23, 1980 1:00 !~.m. ~
N. 721 Jefferson, Broadway Centre 61dg. ~ PLACE: ~
Conference Room ~Znd floor~ . ~ ~
. ~
~ VARIANCE ~ '
. ~
• _ k . ~ k
UN-214~1~, Relaxation of Setback requirement
~ and Relaxation of Frontage Re~uirement ~ „
a. Location; Section 24, Township 25, Range 43 EWh1 ~
Bettmans Addition, Lots 13 - 24. South ;
1/2 of section 24, Townshio 25, Range 43 ~
EWM, Block 6. ~
, .
b. Appl i cant: Joe F. N.auff ~ 1220 S. 6ettman Rd. ~ ~
Spokane , ~~A 99206 ~
c. Proposed Use: Single Family Residence , ,
d. Site Size: .37 acres
e. Existing Zone: Agricultural Suburban
f. Vari ance Requested: Appl i cant requests vari dnce to al 10~~+ a 15 ft.
rear yard setback for Sing~e Family ~esidence
v~hereas the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requi res 25 ft. rear yard setback i n, th ' s zone.
~ ' fr nts on an unmaintaine~ Aoal i cant,s 1 ot o , , ,
county road whereas t~e zoning ordinance requ~re~
that the lot fronts on a maintained county e
Y'Odd•
g. Ar~~lication of Zoning Ordinance: 4.05.110 and 4.05.040
~ ~ V , EY ~v~ _ . ~ 1 . ~ , . ~ , ` ` v ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 1' ~`r ~ , : i t ~ ~ ' , . ~ r }
~ e G' ~ ~ ~1~+~.. ~1 • ~ • • ~ ~ ~ .
~ . ~ • , ~ / , r • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ,I ~ ~ ~
~„r• . • ~ ~r- • ~ • r~tH~~ ~ . M • p+~ ~ 1 ~ • f , c..~c~c.~~ M~Lw~ ~cee~ Sr. p~VL ~ PRc. R. R. . ~ *
~ Oc
• ~ ~ 1►~ RIVE.kSIOE ~ ,
~ o. w R a N ~ R R1---- - - . _ _ - - - ° - ~ . - ~ ~ . ~ ~ I__ . ~ . . . ~ wM • • • • • • •
~ a + ~ r ~ ~ \ ~ ~
~ • ~ y~f ~ ~ ' ~ ~ y ' ' ' ~ . ° • ~ . ' .
' ~ ~s 5 , I J Isz d t . ; , V i I 11 i T A,V E -~•r~ ,
_ ; ~ ~ , ~r z , ~ .
. . ' _ . p G ' ~ _ ~
~ ~ z ~ V ~ ~ Q ~ E. ~ ~ ` ~ . '
~ ~ ~.x • ~
, ~ ' - ~ T1N A TH n
. ~ , • . ~ ~ rr, , , Sg G~ 6~ 6 Z
, ~ ~ \ ~ 1 ; 0 ~ ~ ,
, Q L,
T r.' ' 1 II 6TH ~ ~ r"i ~ - .i ~ ' tY ~...a
. t t ~ T TH
~ti E N~ ~ . ~ ~ f
woqd,(a+~,
, , , 2 3 " .T*+"!!'~,._~~'~''~ .~"'r;,~.;,`-,;,;.. • ~ . 4
{ ` y , . ~ ~ , , 1~.~.G z. ~ • ~ ~ -
~~D ~~C~'1p0~ J ~ ` Q_ . W T o 1 ~ 7
~ p N ~ ~ ~ c..r p . . . .i~ ~ ~ 1z ~ T ~
r 1 ~ ~ Z Q I~TN J ~ ~ ~
• Q ~ ~ .._.r . . . . . -
- ~ ~~t . . ~ZT~ ~ ~ , ~ rN ~.vF 12T~ ~ . ~ _ . ' - . ~1
~ . ~ .
W f r~ a ~ T j ~ ~ . _ ~ 3 ~ ~ w ~ ~ _ ~ L...... _ . ~
o~" - w(~ W~ z _ ~ ~ 1,.
o ~ ~ T ~ ~ , ~ ~ TH ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~ w , ....l~ , -
~ ~ Z J ~ ~ ~ ° ~ tH
, J ~ ~`.T" Z _.~sTM_ ~ 4 . .Y~ ~ . ~ . , I ( _ ~ ~ ~ `
• . , . '+"t'^'. ; . . . , . . . . , . - ~ -
L j J ~~°T M ~n t , U --g T ' f . r' ~ . _ . « . _ `1 ~ I ~ ~ Q ~ ~
~ V ~I ~ ~ ] ~ \ ~ ~ 4 ' 9. n ~ ~ w
I Q Z ~ ~ ~ ~ I ,`1~~,,~~ ~t Q f , ~ I ~ ,
~ ~ Z S l ~ a t~ ~ .
~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~4 - - . I ~ ~ ~ H W ~ - - - - . - "
w y ~.t:r~ ~ V1 ► E, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~
19r►~ ~
J G ~ ~ i T ~TI1~ , • ~ O~ ~ V~ ~ ~
o
~ ~ E L ~i y3 ` ► ~ ~ N ~ ~.a~c ao .^LI
. ~ ~ I s
, ~ ~
~ 2Q~h ~ , _
~WENT Y F~ R5 T,GV E. ~
_ _ ~6 ~ - - ~ 1 .1000 ~c ~
No ~ ~ ' . 3~in? .
n'
-f : „ .
~ f
. . ~
t ~ ~ ~ ~ t • .ik~ ' ~ ~
I ~
.
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ~
, Spokane County, Washington
~
Date Jd~arv_21,.~1. ~~0 ~
To: Douq Adams~Plannin4 ~
FROM : ~ ~ ~ • , $ '
SUBJECT: Zonin~ varidnces ~
r
VE-212-19 Applicant proposes to access his property by easement from Harvard Road. This is not a year around facility and does not enjoy maintenance as pro-
vided to a typical county road, We recommend denial of the variance.
l~owever if the variance is granted it should be subject to the follow~ng
condition:
1. Execute a notice to the public that property is served by a p rivate
road.
SPE-33-79 If variance is granted it should be subjcet to the follow~ng conditions:
1. App]icant convey to Spokane county the north 5 feet for right o~ way
for Valleyway.
2. Execute an agreement to participate in a future RID and/or CRP.
WVE-1-80 No comment
, CU~J-59-79 Check legal description - no comment
UN-214-19 Where applicant proposes to improve his property there is no county right
of way. 13th Avenue as shown in Bettman's Addition was never improved and
therefore has been vacated by~ vari ous state statutes . We recomr~end deni al . .
VN-1-80 These three requests should be considered together, We are unable to tl~ru make any recommendations without more information regarding easement,
VN-3-80
,
~ ~ ~
' ~r ~
At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting of
thi s applic ation , ~
SPOKANF C4U NTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Z~NING ADJUSTOR HE~RING TELEPHQN~ N0: 456-2274
TIME; ~~ednesday, January 9, 1980 1:00 ~.m.
PLACE: N. 121 Jefferson, Broadway Centre Bldg.
Conference Room (2nd floor~
VARIANCE
UN-214~79, Relaxation of Setback requirement
a. Location: Section 24, Township 25, Range 43 EWh1
Bettmans Addition, Lots 13 - 24. South
1/2 of section 24, Townshio 25, Range 43
EWM, Block 6.
b. A~pl i cant: ~)oe F. Hauff 1220 S. Bettman Rd.
Spokane , ~~JA 99206
c. Proposed Use: Single Family Residence
d. Site Size: .37 acres
e. Existing Zone; Agricultural Suburban
f. Variance Requested: A~plicant requests variance to allow a 15 ft.
rear yard setback for Single Family Residence
~~hereas the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
requires 25 ft. rear yard setback in this zone.
~ ~ ~
~ . ~ , ~ s , ~ e ~ ~ ~
, , n 1 ~ ~ - ` _~`~~'~~'4 ! P
Ar~ 1 i cati on of Zoni n Ordi nance ; e 9~ g 4.05.110 ~-~~_y. ~
. a
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~'a~r "~"'.a ~ o
~ y ~ , ~ ~ EY JvA ~ ~ . . ~ , ,
~ ' ~ ~ t~ ~ e f~ 1, r+ • y .ti. ~ . ~ ~ ♦ ~ . . . - . ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ L.~.L ~.,L 5 ~ 1.~..~. ~
~ P ~'I ~V • • - ~ 1 , (
~ ~~-r~~r~. . . .~~~t~..l+~~. ~~..~•ny~~~~~•~~-•~.-•~•~w~~~~~. •r' . . , , . • ~ M Irt'Rt"~"... • M ~ i
- •..e_ c r~ic a~. J, M, ~ w~~~c a e~ 3 r. ~A u ~ ~ PN~. R. R ~_°;:~:~:.:.J ~~~,r:
, ` ~ ~ ~ Ri~EkSIVE ~
~ ~M' . o.wR~. N ~u~•~R1- . . .
. ..r ~ . h{~..... = ~~i~+~ • ts ♦ •♦t'~~'~M +h1~N+~' ~ N Y-~++~+•~ ~«r . w~ . . . ~ ~ . . • . . . . ♦ ~rJ+~ ~1 ~ ~ .-1+-~'+~'R ' ' ~ ~ ~ ' \ A C~ U
• ~ ` ` ~ ~ • ~ . ~ r' j• . 1' ~ • , + ~ ` ' ~1, , r
i ~j I S ~ ~ , ,j ~ ~ _ !Sr ,C .
tJ ~ ~ FiAi ~ AvE , r { ~ ~..r~
~ ~ r J t F" ~ ~ , ~ z- 3 , (/I ~
1 . ~ ~ . . ~ ~ Y _ u • ~ Z ~ ~
U aU ~ a 1- vE ~ I ~ r ' ~ I _ ~
~ . ' ~1
- ' 11H A T N r~ • .1 ' t ' - ,L ~ ~[Yo.4: ~ `
~ ~ Tt ' S9 G'J 6i 5 1 Z . ► ~ ~ ~ 3 0~
. ~ 1~ r~• r ~ • ~ ~ f • ~ ~ p t L
r : o. a ? I ~ r ~ f` ~ 1 Q . ~ H `r~-~ `~t - ~i ~i l 1 6 T N '
_ ~ ,
~ r . 7 TH ~ ~ , a I [ O ~ ~ ~wJ A
~ ~ / ` w~,c~
~ . ~ 2 3 .+.r ~ 4 _
~
~ ' T" ~ - ~ ~ ° ~ ~ l.~ z. , ~ ~ D S~ hpaf • . ~ , ~ y ~ J ~ ~
W ~~TN ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ N' _ - ~y ` ~ - ~ . ~ . ~ . . . . . ~ T .
_ l ~ y
Z Q, I ~ T N ~ x ~ . ~ 4 ~ ~ _ , . T . . ~
R T~ ~ Q ~ ~'1 ~ZTN ~
~ ~ H v f ~ 1 T l-t _ _ . _ . _ . _ . ~ ~ _ -1
~ ~un ~ ~ . ~ w ~ 3~ H a ~ T~ i.~ ~__ti . i~ ~
. ~ ~ . . _ - _ W . _ . . ~ J ~ . r.._ W x ~ r . ~ .
W Q V ~ ~ T N ~ ' ''3 ' ' .+~I~ 1,,.,~. r" ~ ~J x ~ ~14 ~c . ,
~ < w ~ ~ ~j , ~ z ~
~ o ~ ~}-~~4~TH 1 _ixrN"° ~ r~~TH 4 ~ . ~ : ~ ---~~o - ~ 1 • ~
. ( ~ , ~ ^ ; Y ` ~ ' ~
~ J 16TH ~fl r I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ `-r l . Lv - - ~ - . . , r'!'•''~'!"'*"~x..._r•. . . . r`~''~' - _ . e_.. .y~ . _ - ~ I I l ~ ^ ~ ~
,~l~ ~ Z z ~ 1 ~ M y i ~ U 1 ~ H~ ~
fi~ z' ~ r i U w ~ \ y ~ ~ ~
~,~~`.I,'~J ~rr ~ RI, r ~ ~ a ~ ` ~ J ~ ~ - c ` ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ . 0_.-_. .
, ~r ~ ~ lu ~ ~ ~ ~ h \ ~ r,~ 1~1 ~ ~ W ~ ~ _ . .
; ~ ~J `f' ~ ~ r ~ d i x ~ y L~
. C~ . J ~ y, , ~ .
I , f ~ t , ~L ` , ~ • o~/' ,i
~ ~
~ ~ E L ?i y3 " . ° ~ ~ , ~ t.~~KC AO
~ .o O ~
~ Si I ~ ~ ~
~ 1O ~N~ ~
TWENTY F~R ~T ,GVE. ~ W ~
_ . 26 ~ : _ - ~ :10a0 fi
No ~ ~ ~
3`~t'~? .
n~ , -t ,
~ ~ Y ~
,
t ~.~1 ~ ~.Y
~
ul~'i~' ICL (J1' CUllN`l'Y l~N(~IN~;~;R
S~~~akan~: Ccaur~~y, W~shinyton
ua ~e ~
To: Douq Adams/Planninp -
FkOM:Richard Hoover/Engineer's ,
su~J~;c~r: Zoni ng Vari ances ~
VE-218-19 No comment ,
UE-216-79 Dalke Road is not a maintained county road, therefore we recommend the
variance be denied. However, if the varian ce is granted it should be subject to the fo]lowing conditions:
1. Appl i cant convey to Spokane County the north 15 feet for ri ght
of way on Dalke Rd.
2. Execute an agreement to participate in a future RID and/or CRP.
3. Execute a notice to the public that property is not served by
an established and maintained county road.
UN=214-79 The only established and maintained county road serving applicant's proper~y is Bettman Road. If he fronts his dwelling on this road
he has no need far a variance. We would need to see a site plan
prior to making our recommendation. ~
UE-219-79 If variance is granted it should be subject to the following con-
dition:
1. Execute an agreement to participate in a future RID andior CRP.
UW~217-79 No comment
VE-213-79 A plicant proposes to access his property by easement from ~~arvard P
Road . Thi s i s not a year at~ound f aci 1 i ty and does not en j oy mai n~
tenance as provided to a typical county road. We recommend denial
of the variance. Hawever, if the variance is granted it should be subject to the followin~ condition:
1. Execute a notice to the pub1ic that property is served by a
private road.
UN-215-19 A licant roposes to access h~s property by easement from Fruit pp p • ~ ~ ~ recommend
Hill Road. Th~s 1s not a mainta~ned County Road. We
denial of the variance. ~