VE-132-83 ~ :m_,.~~. . . .
~ . -
ZONICJG ADJUSTOR
SPOKAME COUNTY, IJGISHIN(;TOfJ
IN THE MATTER OF: VE-132-83 )
RELAXATIOlV OF REAR YARD SETBACK ) FINDINGS OF FFlCT, DECISION
HAGEN AND CONDITIOfJS ,
THIS f4ATTER, Being the consideration hy the Zoning Adjustor of Spoi:ane County,
APPROVING the application (UE-132-83), for the purpose of establishing a zero rear
yard setback foi- a commercial building, hereinafter referred to as the "Pr•oposal"
and the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County having held a public hearinq on July 27th
and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and havinct rendered a
decision on the 3rd day of August, 1983, APPROVING said proposal, does hereby make •
the following: FIfJDIPlGS OF FACT
l. That the prooosal is generally located.adjacent to and east of Arqonne Road
approximately 200 feet north of Sinto Avenue in Section 17-25-44, Parcel Plo.
17542-1739, in Spokane County.
2. That the proposal consists of a commercial building with'in the Local Business
Zone, to be located on the rear lot line, whereas, the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
requires a 15 foot setback in this zone.
3. That the adonted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land Use Plan ,
indicates Commercial usage of the area encoiripassed bv the proposal. .
4. That the site is zoned Local Busin?ss. •
5. That the existing lanci uses in the area of proposal are predominani:ly
connercial uses and office buildinas. ~
6. That the applicant indicated a Farty Wall Aqreement has been established
between himself and the property immediately to the"'east of this proposal evhich
would be most affected by the rear yard setback requirement.
7. That the agreement betNieen the property owner is evidence that no rnaterial
detrimenta is anticipated by the property owners most affected by the proposal.
8. That no written or oral testimony was i-eceived in opposition to the prnposal
prior to or at the public hearing.
9. Tbat the site lies between two rnajor county arterials, Argonne and Plullen
Roads and is an area which is intended to develop as a unified commercial complex.
10. That the applicant's pmposal is consistent with the overall development
scheme of the area and serves to marimize development opportunity in the ai-ea :vithout
adverse effect on ad,joining properties.
ll. That the proposal othei'wise ineets all current standards of the Spol:ane County
Zoning Ordinance foi• this use.
12. That the proper legal requir-ements for advertisinp of the heai'inn before
the zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been met.
COPlCLUSION
1. That the proposal is compatible with existing uses in the area.
2. That the proposal is not detriinental or othei-viise harmful to the pudilic
health, safety and welfare.
DECISION
From the for•egoing Findings, a review of the Planning Denai•tment File Ple. VE-13?_-83,
testimony at the public hearing, and a site visit, the Zoning Adjustor hereby in
APPROVING the proposal makes the following conditions:
. _ u._ . ..M.. . . .
FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION APID CGNDITIOPlS • VE-132-83 PI1GE
A. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTD1ENT
1) That the applicant develop the piroperty in strict confoi°mance with the
plot plan on •file with the Spokane County Planning Department.
2) The applicant must comply with all conditions, otheY° than'the rear yard
setback, established and cur•rently in effect at the time of the local
business zoning of this pr-operty.
B. DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
1) All buildings and structures require building permits as per Section 301
of the Unifonn Buildina Code.
C. UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1) Disposal of waste is subject to the conditions of the Spokane County Utilities
Department and the Spokane County Heaith District.
D. HEALTH DISTRICT
1) Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities.
2) Disposal of sewage generated on site is subject to the conditioris and liini±'s
imposed by the 5pokane Coumty Health Distr•ict.
E. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
1) Access permits to the site inust be obtained from the Spokane County Enaineei4-
inq Department prior to building permit release.
DATED THIS 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 1983. ,
.
>
STEVE 0 ROII6IOSKI, ACTING ZOPIIMG ADJUSTOi?
SPOKANE GOUPJTY, WASHINGTON
, ~ .
r SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTUR PUBLIL HEAPING (continued)
~ TIME: 1:15
AGENDA: July 27, 1983
7. VE-132-83 RELAXATION OF REAR YARD SETQACK (Generally
located adjacent to and east of Argonne Road
approxiiTiately 200' north of Sinto Avenue in
Section 17-25-44).
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes a zero rear
yard setback within a local business
zone for a commercial buildinq, whereas
the Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance
requi res a 15' rear yard setback for
this use.
SITE SIZE: 88' X 120'
APPLICANT: Kim Hagen
8. VW- 155-82 (A-F) RELAXATION OF FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS (Prope rty
is gene rally located adjacent to and north of
Baker Road and lies southeasterly of Interstate
Freeway in,Section 13-23-40).
PROPOSAL: Applicant proposes establishinq 6
residential lots served by a 60' private
easement within a 20 acre site, whereas
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
requires public maintained road frontage
~ in the Agricultural Zone.
SITE SIZE: 20 acres
APPLICANT: Kenneth B. Neu
9. VE-130-83 RELAXATJO~ OF SIDEYARO SETBACK (Generally located
adjacen o and south of Sprague Avenue, approxi-
mately 1,000' east of Evergreen Road in Section
23-25-44).
PROPOSAL: To all'ow the construction of retail
space and racquet club to be located
, one foot from the westerly property
line, whereas the Spokane County Zoning
, Ordinance requires a 5' setback for
each story of the structure.
SITE SIZE: 62,100 S.F.
APPLICANT: WAM Enterprises, Inc.
C
~ • - 3 -
• ' ^ _R CS4
~ V
r - ~riY•' ~ ~ "r I ~ ~ 8 *o',
a f1 . "rr^+h • - -.y;, 'J.r t _
~~,,,,~`r► -7
~ J x ya Rn Alv
'£L ` ~ , .,,..N►.~oN`
cr x, c ~ r ~ y u
- ~ 7 Mt~H~E,II 7 .
a ' - j ~ + ~ . ~1 s I r~"~.~.►n , ~
`^r-~''" - ~e 7y, ~ vn.t~+1..~'~t`.~,+~A ~ •~V~r' a J
~ ~
1~~~ j 3 W N %
`i
f ik 5*J70 ~ tK~ z
, .
• { • ~ • ,
~
''w' ~~li_` ~'"~~~~L•~~ 3 ~ '
Z t • ~.~~,r.r. ~ .
Z,~ , J a _
i• ~ , ~ F ' ~ r,r, , ~ ~ AL. .
S5
J i• 2 t y t l i . i ~ J 3j ~ ~
~ • - p, rc 4 . •
1~ ~ ~',~:.;~.Y•,..-; : ~ Q ` ~ 1 4. j
~ i ~,~e' . , " ' ' -~~~``'y. ~ 1J t Y. C ~ r
. . ' ~ t~ ; a • 7. = G . ~ h5 t`~ : `WMd
S J ~
iy-
yy ~A ~'i~~ _y~ ~W _Jy r ~ l
J 1 . 1."s'~ ~ j . ~ ~ i
..~.;r~.•-'-r~~l..-. V'ofis• ~YL ~~~;NC,STIN i r}~ y ~
t c~4
i ~ r.• ,
•v,r, i 312
G U
:;.~'lr%' ~ • u:;,.
F ^l.~ ,
~ • •
` SPOKANE COUNTY PLAhEIJING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT/VARIANCE/WAIVER 0F VIOLATION
Date: ~vtJ1y La, Appl i cati on No : 'VE /3Z'$3
f
Name of Applicant: L/EM 9A ctEx
Street Address of Applicant: • KbW A-314
City: '5QakA0E State: l✓~ • Zip Code: c1g~~ Tele. No: 3 2-7-7 7 S4
Name of Property Owner(s V~~►w) G KuK-P ( Ta HAJ 941L ,f MSVA)
Requested Acti on ( Ci te Ordi nance Secti on 114 c,u ir.&- Ta ZET-+t A- Y4 RZ
S~ r l3ac+~ r-b t1 c..co w 20 ►2-r--A-rz V4r-D
Existing Zoning Classification: LIS
Existing Use of Property: VA-e-- RxrW
Proposed Use of Property : co 0" 1" Ee- << A-` 151-p-ini.
_ Legal Description of Property (Include ?egal description of easement if applicable)
- ~,eaGT .,4 g- aS K-
.
Comprehensive Plan Designation: rh ov+ •
Section: 1-7 Township: Range: qy
Source of Legal : J(~ . Ct Lt
Assessor's Parcel No. (See tax statement) {"T SL( 2' a~
~ Property Size: g$ X i'Zv Frontage: Feet on: A2.6owNE kp-
, Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor:
o -F- ~ , ss
Street Address of the Property : /v• ~'1-2-7- 4~~ " AJ'E
If you do not hold title to the oroperty affected by this application, wnat is
your interest in it? QV--qc.roA- zI A-e,~~u-r ~-ti'(Z ,l°D2cWasE~
Please list previous Planning Department actions invblvinq this proqerty:
S P - "7 ~ - bSSATTACHED HeREWI7AHM OWNER tYEAC~TI0N5
ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. -
(Signe ~/.Date:
N V
• ~ (Address) / .~Phone.
Zi p .
: ' '
NOTARY c , 5/ Date :
NOTARY SEAL': u
;n SIGN ATURE OF APPLTCANT OR ArENT
~
r
Date:
~ i : * * * * * ~r * * it ~r * Ac * ~c ~c ~r * Ir * ir * ~r ~lr * ~t dc ~t ~Ir 7F * ~c t t 9c * * yr
FOR PLANNING E US ON Fees Receipt # ~~7~
Nearing Date• ~ Legal Checked by: '
_ 1 +
~
A. ALL APPLICATIONS
1. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRI-CT No ~ A liminary consultation has been held to discuss the oronosal. The
ap i ant has been i ormed of requirements and standards.
S.
S IG ~ ~U E ) DAT
B. AP~ICATION FO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ONLY
This tion of the application will provide the Planninq Department's Staff
with wri ten verification that the applicant has'had oreliminary consultation
with the a ncies identified. Results of the preliminary consultation should
be incorpora d in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Deoart-
ment. 1-1
1. COUNTY U7ILI ES DEPARTMENT
A preliminary~isultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has bee\informed of requirements and standards.
~ (SIr,NATURE) ~ (DATE)
. 2. WATER~~URUEYOR (N PM,h
, a) The ,.oposal (is) (is t) located within the boundary of our service
area.
• b) Satisfact' arranqements ~iave) (have not) been made to serve this
proposal.
c) 6Je (are) (are t) a51e to serv this site with adequate water.
(SIGNATURE) (DATE)
C. APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE ONLY
1. In view of the above information, what special circumstance(s) (beyond vour
. control or actions) deprive you of the same qeneral riqhts and privileqes
of other prooerty owners within the same zone and vicinity?
. ~4 .
2. If the Variance were granted, how would it affect eiqhbgq ropgrties
ar improvements? l
. ~
'a f b [`e rw wt•~• ~ ~ m ~ ~ A ~'t ~ l ~•a,. ~
3. Is the prooerty presently used, or can it be used in a manner similar to
the uses within the vicinity without a Variance? (i.e. single-familv resi-
dence or comnercial use). PLEASE EXPLAIN
~...t~.~
D. I,JAIV OF V I OLAT N ON LY
1. Ho or Why was e structure established outside tf~e provisions of the
S4ok e County Zo ing Ordinance?
. `y,• . . ~ - - .
2. What facts s port the apftlicant that a Waiver of Violation should be
granted? ~ .
E . ~
.%1,': . • i . .
I•`',~ ~
•l~~. ,l .
~
. ZONING AGJl1STOR
SPOKANE COUNTY, bIF;SHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF VE-99-82; ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISIOiI
PRING . ) AND CONDITIONS
THIS P1ATTER, 6eing the consider•ation by the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane
County, approving the application (VE-99-82), for the qurpose of a rear yard
setback variance and a oarking variance, hereinafter referred to as the
"Proposal", and the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane Count,y having held a public
hearing on June 10, 1982 continued to July 20, 1982 and having fully consider-
ed all testimony presented thereat, and further having visited the site and
vicinity in question, and having rendered a decision on the llth day of -
August, 1982, approvinq said proposal does hereby make the follokaing:
FINDIPlGS OF FACT
l. That the proposal is generally located on the northwest corner of
Sprague Avenue and Herald Road on parcel 417544-2611.
2. That the proposal consists of a rear yard setback variance from the
required 15 foot setback to no setback and a parking variance from the re-
quired 57 spaces to 44 spaces. ~
3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized, Comprehensive Land Use
Plan indicates Commercial usage of the area encompassed by the proposal.
4. That the site is zoned Commercial by Qoard of County Commissioners
decision of August 11, 1982.
5. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include single
. family residences, commercial facilities, and Lmdeveloped land.
6. That the proposal is coinpatible with existing uses in the area.
7. That the proposal is not detrimental or otherwise hannful to the
public health, safety and welfare. '
8. That the proposal is not totally inconsistent with the surrounding
land use classification and does not grant a special privilege or rignt,s to
the applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent pr•operty owners.
9. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing be-
fore the Zoning Pdjustor of Spokane Count,y have been met.
10. That a revised site plan was submitted to the Board of County Com-
missionens on July 20, 1982. This approval is based on the revised plan.
11. That the applicant substantiated the reduced parking requirements
for this specific use. • _
12. That the propei-ty immediately west of this site is zoned for commer-r.ial
development and under the saine ownership as this site. The rear yard setback, ,
in effect, then acts as a side vard. Current commerical zone standards do not
require a side yard setback between conunei-cial developments.
DECIS[Oi!
Froin the foregoing Findings. a reviev, of the Planninq Departriient File No.
VE-99-82, testimony at the public heariny, and a site visit, the Zoning Adjustor
hereby in approving the proposal makes tfie follokaing conditions:
A. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1) The westerly wall of the proposed structure shall be an approved fii-e
rated kqall as per the Uniform Building Code.
2) The approval of the parking va.riance is restricted to a single user of
the same nature or land use type as that specified in the request.
The approval of the parking variance is subject to a fabric wholesaler
utilizing the entire 11,640 squar-e foot space. All other uses shall
~
. ~ ~
Y ~
• ~ NDINGS OF FACT, DECISION APlD COPJDITIONS ~ VE-99-82 PAGE 2-
A. COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (Continued)
or combination of uses shall conFoi-m to Zoning Ordinance requirements.
DATED THIS DFlV OF i;~-I,~.. lr.~:~ , 1982•
~7 .
MflRCIA RAIPIES', 7_ONIPIG AOJUSTOR
SPOKADlE COUNTY, WASHINGT0IJ
•
.(?'0{
~ ~EuY1Pg: I\iiGf~,i3 `L90 1970
_ ' ,1 , . , 'ZUE~ ~ V1 rit:t2n: Apri? l l 0 19 i ~
_FIAP,IANC£ . .
F✓'E-52-78. Rear Setback
ZGNIIVG AIDjUSTOR DEGiSION: Ta appeove the aPplica!at's a•zqiest fcr a 15ft. t{arlanca
s:o aliocv a srructure Yo be located to the rear proposcy line oi his cornmec,-,ial zoned pioperCy.
A. REasows:
1. Because o-f speciai c+rcumstal-i;,es apalicable to the p.•c.,ertj, partfculatiy in
respect to susrounding :,om;nercial uses, the striei applicnc?on of :he Zoniiig
Ordinance 4vou2d doprlde YIie suh$ect property of Eighis ataa pa•iviiecres en}oyerl by
radpaee~t loroperties. -
2. An adgacerzt comme!; taZ strucCure is c:urrenely by rig"r_t eiijoling tiha crivil.ege of
having a siruc2uro wich a"0" 5eL'bdClC 117i iR Y.I1B jJ?'6psfi;) lin.s i.z que,tion. ThR
applicant is desirous to have Lhe san:e p:ivileye aiid is tY:eseicre nc2 asking foe
a spectai privilegs.
3. Eor higher intens+_ty land usss such a> commc-rcial a~d i.?cius+~~ faI entet-prises,
the need is fox e:>gosure, parki:,g and r.irculai:_on. T?la appiicani,ix requif-QC1 Co -
fo13oHd the sYricC applicacion of the zoaing ord!r.ance, urould ?aave creat2d llilUSeCl
space be:vioen two buildlnr,s ancl 'Lhereby resaucinci the amcunc oE iz:ont yarei
area needed ffer peeking, clrculabien aeid truclcdeliceFies.
4. T1ze Joinfny of itvo commercial sErucYu,es in the commerwiaa zone would prevent
co1fleCtion of "jLri{:° a DSOJiflC' fOt rEitex security and c{e: te v rncre op°P.e3S
B.jJgD°2EF3RcC' . S. FusePaetmore, the granE!ng of thls 4IGE'L-zizce wiii noC va maferialEy Letr+_menta.l ro
the public Evaifare and to adjacont psc.~pert-ies. '
3. CONAITi'ONS: ,
1. T3ne applicant must demonstrate comp7i~n;;F; vr3fita the Short P;.a`c Orainance grior to
41se fssuance of a Luilding permiC.
2. 'th2 proPo3t.°Ci S$PllciUP'c S`I131: con7ply vii[3t &il f1re and safc?y uYe!'idaiC1S.
3. liie applfe;ant sha3P cievolop the site 2:r2 in Conformancs cviLh the ulei: plan en
file croviCh this agplfcation.
C. OBJ£CTOftS OF ftECORD: N'one
(ConEd.} • ,
~w~',_."',;r,,.a~`.., n . • . . • . . , . , ,4 v.
°~S~f{:;..°l`~,. , . ' - . . , - . _ ' • -
. _I IY •
! 1
i15RIANCE
E-52-78, Rsar Yard SE~-bac;:
D, G£NiRAL M1'A:
-4!i E.4`Y.tJ[.
a. Location: Seciicn %7e '.LGbJllsizip 25Pv, > ange I
ThaL eortion o: 'tr.e SW 1/4 of Yhe SE 1.14 of ttze
S£ 1/4 descrzbsl as sod:ewos: Eeg. 2t api. oi iii:essec+:lon wi:h tiie £ right°of.-way
of B31£ous Rc+. a?ttl F.i?e 1\I C?ghi-of-way ?.ine of Che Spok«ne & i+.2lard Fmhire Railroad
Co; t'i. N along safd E :igi?t-oi-viay li.ne o£ Baliour Rd, 200 rC. to~`Yi?8 ri:e pC. of
beg; th. cor.tinuslg PI, alor.g said E liri.a, 130.,`t. to a gl•. on the S line oi• Tot 10;
Block A of Opporiunityt, Plar 3, acc.orcl!ng Co a:at recoz•ded zn Look S of Pl.ats, page..
15; Lh. N 830 37'50" E, alorg said S liiie ok LoE 10, :55;i; Lh. S on a Iine paralb.ei
to the E riyht-oi=~aay line of 13aliour Pra, 55fe; th. S 8044'14" W„ 65.83 ii:; ch.
S 8°°37°30° Wo 145 xk. to the Lrae pc. of beyirm,i:g.
Parcel No. 19544-9033 (porCion oi)
b, Ap?licant: L3a,ik G:inalcis
' S 521 Shor Line Driae
Spokane, IA'A. 990101
c. Sife S!ze: Ar3prvr:imaCely 39,800 sq.it.
d. ExisYfng Zoning: Comme-mial
e. Variance Reauasted: To ai3ow a sCructure io 'rsave a zem (0) rsar
' yard seibbcF:, ~•vcereas ehe 3go',:ane 4:oi.inep
Lcniny Ocdinance requires a rear yard setback of 15feei:, -
f. ApAlic3tion of Zon?r.g Provision: Chz;pter 4.10, Section 4.10.0'30 (b) ,
~
Z
, `aI3UN~. BwiS; '.-or,ix:g Adiusbr'
` OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER .
SrOKANE COUNTY, WASHtNGTON
Date j13Jy 26
lnttr-office Cann+unication
Spokane County Zoning Adjustor
a~ ro '
Bob MeCann, Land Development Coordinator
Subjwt&glnda Itemg 5chedulgd for Public Hearinw 3uly 27. 1983 ; • ~
1. V B 4 0-8 3 o b b i❑s - 14a comments cancerninB this aPplication.
;2. VE 132-83 Hagen - No comments concernirig Chie application. ~
~ 3. VN 93 A&B Heitman - See attsched commeats.
4. VE 121-83 Brutger Co. - No comment concerning thie application.
L-
5. VN 129-83 Thomas - See attached commente.
. .
- 6. VE 130-83 WAM Ent. Inc. - No comments concerning thie application.
7. Vtii 155-83 {A thru F} - Neu - See attached coamenta.
8. CUW 29-83 Lemay 6 Cochrane - 5ee attached commaents. _
:ry
~
BMc/Bet r
~
r
. . ~ , f..k.
4
. . . , . . ~1
I ' • ' y ' , r q• J M r''~`1;.~ ' '~Y,' !
y1. . ~ • ~ ~ •
..a;k 'f . , .
, . 'e
7r
,
,
a
_ _ _ _
s
1
I
1
f
i
I