VE-225-84
y ~t
ZUN1NU Al1JUSlUK
SYUKANt L'UUN 1`( , WA5ti1N31UN iN T11E MA I I tK UF KttAxA f iUN Or r LEtir1x 1NU S ti RtLI} f iNu ikI~S Ur Val: I,
SETt3ACK UN SARGEN1 RU. (1 NlItD UF FUUR RtLAI tU ) I:UNI;LUSIUNS, UtC151UN ANU
ISSUES). (Vt-'L'L5-tS4); YK1N6 l:U1tF'UKHIlUN. ) I:UNUlIlUNS Uf ANNRUYNL
IN1S MAIItR, Being the consideration by the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane
Gounty, in hearing appliCation Yt-['[5-d4, hereinatter referred to as the
"Sargent Road Proposal", and the Loning Adjustor ot 5pokane l:ounty having held
a public hearing which began on Z/l:ilby and was continued through 3l17(b5 and
having fully considered all testimoRy presented thereat, and turther having
vi si ted 0 e si te and vi ci ni ty i n questi on, and havi ng rendered a deci si on on
the /I- day ot April, 19b5, UtNYINU the Sargent Road proposal, makes the
following:
F iNU 1NUS ur rAC; i
1. Ihat the proposal is generally locatea on the west side ot Sargent
Road, between First Avenue and Second Avenue and is turther described ds
Nssessors Parcel #19541-UbUI, being block b, West Uishman Adaition, Section
ly, Township '15N, Range 44 EWM.
Z. That the Sargent Road proposal consi5ts of locating the proposed
automoti ve service center at a 1 ocati on 1 U feet from the property 1 i ne an
Saryent Road, whereas the zoning ordinance for the Gounty requires a setback
ot lU teet trom this flanking street property line.
J. Ihat the adopted Spokane l:ounty future Land Use ►'lan designates the
area ot the proposal as kural /Majar l:omnerci al transi ti on, outsi de of the 4'SSA
and the proposal i s consi stent wi tn the (:ounty's enti re c:omprehensi ve NI an,
due to the transition poiicy.
4. Ihat the site is zoned l:ommercial/ASA Uverlay which would allow the
proposed lu foot setbacK upon approval ot this application.
5. Ihat the existing land uses in the area ot the proposal include
vacant and park (natural area) to the 5auth and auto and motorcycle
Gealerships to the west, north, and east all ot which are compatible with the
proposal.
b. lhat pursuant to the State tnvlronmental No41cy Act the environmentai
checKlist and other data has been reviewed and the project has been tound to
not haYe any probab 1 e si gm ti cant adverse i mpacts to the physi ca 1 environ-
ment. a uetermination ot Nonsignificance (uNS) was issued on rebruary 8,
1985, and sent to six otfics and agencies ot jurisdiction. Ihe agencies
reviewing the checKlist neither indicated that a more detailed envirorrnental
review shoula be provyded nor comnented that tne UNJ should be re-COn5laered.
l;omments regardi ng enviromenta I matters were nat ma4e at the putit i c neari ng.
Inere was not sutticient evidence presented pursuant to WAC: 191-11-J4u (J) (a)
to withdraw the UNS.
ihat there appeared both parties in tavor ot and opposed to tne
proposal,
b. ihat the proper 1egal requirements tor advert}sing ot the nearing
betore the [oning Adjustor ot Spokane l;ounty have been met.
y i
.
FINDINGS UF FACT, GONCLUSIONS, UE(;ISION ANU I;ONUITIONS UF APPItUVAL
(SAKUENT RU. SETBACK VA{tIANCE - TNIRU OF FUUR RELATEU ISSUtS; VE-225-84) Page 2
9. That due to the quantity of petroleum hydrocarbons stored on site
(more tihan l0U gallons of combined solvents, degreasers, etc.), the proposal
was judged to be a Critical Materials Use Activity; that the poposed use was
designated a Critical Materials Use Activity; and that the applicant accepted
that designatian and waived his rignt of appeal, thereby acknowledging his
understanding of and intent to comply with the Aquifer Sensitiv Area Uverlay
Zone provisions for a Critical Materials Use Activity outside the Priority
Sewer Service Area (Section 4.1bN.00 (1) of the Spokane Gounty Loning
Urdi nance ) .
lU. That the testimony is true with regard to the location of a former
landfill as complicatting the building siting problems on this site; that the
landfill materials which most directly affect the instability of the ground
upon which this structure could reasonably be expected to be built existed
prior to the applicant's purchase of this portion of the ground, that the
applicant in this respect, has not "created" the hardship from which he seeks
reltef, and in fact is entitled, as a subsequent property awner to those who
most likely created the hardship, to be the first to apply for a variance from
the zoning regulations, which regulations, when combined wiwth the hardship,
makes the deve1opment of the site, very difficult and impractical for the use
to which this applicant wishes to put the site as we11 as difficult and
impractical for most applicants wishing to construct a contemporary autamotive
service center.
11. The the applicant did allow various portions of the site farther to
the west to be filled with refuse under his supervision, but that supervised
filliny did not create the problem that currently exists at the site and from
which the applicant is seeking relief through the variance process.
12. That evidence has been submitted in the form of an engineering report
from Budinger and Associates, geotechnical and material enginers, which
establishes that a substantial portion of the unstable "refuse" fill would
have to be removed and specifically selected new fill brought in and compacted '
to the consistency of the ad,jacent alluvial sana ana gravel in order to
establish a firm basis upon which to erect footings and foundations for the
new building; that such building compliCations are no different than a hill or
a basalt rock outcropping appearing on one's lot or parcel, which hill or rock
outcropping is traditiona1ly accepted as a special circumstance of the site
for which yard dimension variances are frequently granted.
l:i. That numerous praperties in the area in the same zone exist as
contrary to the currently required setbacks, many of the buildings having been
located priur to the institution of the area's zoning.
14. That the Spokane (:ounty Engineer maintains a long range plan far a
new major arterial along the pre5ent Second Avenue aligrment and that this
plan includes an important connection between Sprague Avenue and 2nd Avenue
via Sargent Roatl.
15. That the County Engineer has recomnended no access to Sargent Road in
the event the variance is approved so as to not conflict with the ftow of
future traffic on Sargent Road a5 it achieves a higher volume of traffic.
16. That the long range plan for Sargent koad requires acquisition of
additional riyht-of-way on the west side and a 25 foot turning radius on the
northwest corner of Sargent and 2nd Avenue on its northwest corner; that the
l;ounty Engineer expressed the opinion that granting a variance and the
subsequent issuing of a builaing permit will constrain the future constructian
of the much needed 2nd Avenue to Sprague Avenue connection via Sargent Road.
c .
FIkUINUS aF FACS, CONGtUSIUNS, DECISIUN AND CUNDITIUNS UF APPROYAL
(SAJtGENT Rll. SkTKACK VARIANGE - ThIRU OF FUUk RELATEU ISSUES; VE-225-84) Page 3
17. That it is necessary and appropriate for the County to engage in the
long range planning of road systems, particularly arterials, in order to serve
the public interest and the general welfare and that striving for the long
term objective of a 2nd Avenue arterial and a connecting link on Sargent koaG
between the existing 5prague Avenue arterial and the future 2nd Avenue
arterial is a legitimate long range goal to be recognized and supported
through land use decisions.
16. That the vari arce as proposed i s i ncompati Dle wi th future road
demands for the area.
19. That a traditional purpose of a building seCback f rom a road
riyht-of-way, as found in all zoning ordinances, is to assure an ample amount
af space, li9ht, and air, to provide for a common line of building structures
for aesthetic reasons, to provide the space and opportunity for goverrment to
acquire additional road right-of-way in the event it is necessary to widen a
given thoroughfare and to provide unobstructed views of other vehicles and
pedestrians for traffic leaviny and entering private property.
2U. That no Sargent Koad setback variance was sought nor granted for the
Pring Corporatian bodyshop inmediately to the east, across Sargent Road, and
in fact that structure remains 2U feet from the flanking street property line.
21. That prior to the construction of a Sargent Itoad link to a ma,jor 2nd
Avenue arterial, traffic volumes should allow for limited access to a parts
delivery door on Sargent Road; but that the County Enqineer may exercise
authori ty to requi re ra del i veri es from vehi cl es parki ng i n the ri ght-of-way
of Sargent Road.
22. That the Sargent Road property of the applicant should be landscaped
as the road system evolves on Sargent koad and it may be necessary to restrict .
the future access Lo the applicant's property from Sargent Road. From the Findings of Fact, the Zoning Ndjustor comes to these:
CUNCLUSIUNS
1. The need to seek a variety of variances is caused by the presence of
the former landfill in the general vicinity of the southwest corner of the
proposed building and the landfill is judged to not have been created by the
present applicant, although the applicant did purchase the site realizing
there was some degree of instability in the underlying soils.
2. That the applicant has had an engineering investigation which has
detailed the extent of the unstable soils, and the recomnendations of that
consultant are that a substantial portion of the "refuse fillu be removed to
the level of the native sand and gravel soils, with a subsequent need to fill
and compact with similar soils to provide a firm enginering foundation; and
further the loose sand and gravel fill applied over some of the area will need
ta be excavated somewhat to provide far gutting same foundatians to be located
on them more stable, older undisturbed soils.
3. The Zoning Adjustor has the responsibility to anticipate future needs
and demands of the general traveling public and to accomodate to the maximum
extent possible those needs insofar as such decisions will not tmpose
unreasonable and extraordinary limitations on private properties.
4. The proposal as set forth would restrict the ability of the County to
make a practical and efficient road connection between Sprague Avenue and 2nd
Avenue in the future and is therefore detrimental to and not compatible with
the public health, safety, and welfare.
5. Although the property and the proposal is somewhat deprived of
privileges comnonly erjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone,
granting of the companion variances accompar~yiny this application will remedy
the difference in privileges and at the same time protect the public interest
and general welfare.
FINUINtiS OF FALT, GUNLLUSIONS, UE(;ISIUN ANU GUNUITIUNS OF APYKUYAL
(SpftGLNT ftU. SETBACK YNFtIANCE - 7hIItU UF FUUR RELATEU ISSUtS; VE-225-84) Nage 4
b. The granting of this variance would be a grant of special privileges inconsistent with those enjoyed by ather properties in the vicinity and zone
except for a building to the northeast which is built on the Sargent Koad
property line and which was constructed prior to zoning which would now
restrict such a location.
7. The strict application of the normal ZU foot setback for flanking
streets does not deprive the subject property of rights and privileges comnon
to ather properties in the area and under identical zones insofar as the
companion variances granted equalize arky inequities.
UEGYSIUN
From the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the 'Loning Adjustor
UtNItS the proposal.
UATEU 7hIS l{ ~f LIAY UF APRIL, 1yb5.
4
IN M.5H b~c, AiGP,
ZUN ING AUJUSTOK, SI'OKANE CUUNTY,
WASNINUTON
FILEU:
1) Hpplicant
2) Parties of Record
3) Spokane County Engineers Uffice
A) Spokane (;ounty Uept. of Building & Safety
NUTE: ANY PAltTY AbGKItYEU BY ThIS UECISIUN MUST FILE NN APPtNL WI'fN1N TEN
(lU) GHLENUAk UAYS UF ThIS UATt.
UUbUz
4/U2/85
I
. ~
r
SPOKANE ENYIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-II-970) Sectlon 11.10.230 (3) Determinatfon of Nonsigniticance (DNS)
MITIG,4TED OETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFIC1INCE
DESCRIPT'ON OF PROPO~/IL: Location end construction of an euto service/parts center for e ma,Jor auto dealershlp
on what fs now an existing auto storage and parkfng lot eree. The use Is tentatively deslgnated as a Critical '
Materlels Use Activfty and Is outsiCe the Prlority Serrer Servlce Aree, but within the Aqutfer Sensitive llrea and
the General Sewer Servtce Area.
FILE NO.: VE-225-84
PROPONENT: Pring Corporatlon (dba Applexey Toyota)
LOCATlON ~ PROSAL, INCLUDiNG STREET AODRESS, IF ANIf: Slte Is bounded by Flrst and Second l~venue end Sargent
Road ~n t S~po ane Yalley at approxlmetely the E. 8500 block.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
The lead agency tor this proposal has determined that It does not heve e probable slgniticent adverse Impact on
the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Is not required under RCYI 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This
decislon wes made after revfer of a canpleted environmentel checklist and other Information on flle xith the lead
agency. Thls Information Is avellable to the publlc on request.
There Is no camient perlod for this DNS.
()(X) This DNS is issued under WAC 197-II-340 (2) and 350 (4) and (5): the lead agency will not act on thls
proposal for et leest 15 days from the date Issued (belor), at rhlch tfine it becames final. Cowents
regarding this DNS must be submltted no leter than 5:00 p.m., February 26, 1985 if they are intended to
alter the DNS. DNS ISSUED OONTINGENT UPON COhPLIANCE WITH ASA OVERLAY ZONE OR AOUIFER PROTECTION
ME/1SURE5 DESCRIBED IN CHECKLIST RESPONSES B.3.b (2), (4) ANO (5), PAGE 5 OF CNEpCLIST; WHICHEVER IS
STRICTEST.
Responsibie Offlclal: YIALLIS D. HU88ARD by Thomas G. Mbsher, AICP
Position/Title: Spokane County Zoning AdJustor Phone: (509) 456-2205
Address: N. 721 Jefferson St., Spokane, wA., 99260
Cortrnents regarding envlronmentel concerns are vrelc t hearin . ~
Dete Issued: Februery 8, 1985 SI natuce: ~
♦ • • • • t r t t t ~ a • w w • • • • • 4 s • t w • • • • * • a ~ t • t • a ~ • s ♦ • s w ♦ • • s • • a • • s r t
~ • I
APPEAL of this determination, after it becames flnal, may be made to Thanas G. Mbsher. AICP, at the Spokane
County Planning Department, N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA, 99260. The eppeal deedllne Is the same as the
above proposai appeal deadline, befng 10 calendar days after the signing of the Findings d Order. This appeal
must be written, must be prepared pursuant to spectflc criteria and be on official appeel forms. Contact the
Planning Department to assist you Mlth the specifics of a SEPA appeal.
iF M 1F • M M♦ t t•# t f•• t A• M•• M M•• t# f• t 4• R R• iF A• iF k IF 1F 11 ! t• f t t• i#•
A copy of the DNS Mas malled to:
I) Spokane County Engineer's Offlce: Attn: Bob Turner
2) Spokane County Health Dlstrlct: Attn: Dennts Kroll
3) Spokane County 1209' Study; c/o County Englneer's
4) Spokane County Utllitles Dept.: Attn: Bfll Dobratz
5) Fire District 11, E 10319 Sprague, Spokene, WA 99206
6) Dishman Water Company, E. 8814 Sprague, Spokane, MA 99206
7) Applicant, c/o John Konen
2-7-85
0047z
SYOKANE ENViHUNMEN1N. Jiiulnnat-r- Section 11.10.230(1)
Environmental Checklist
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, requires
al] governmental agencies to consider the enviranmental impacts of a
proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement
(EIS) must be prepared for alI proposals with probable significant ad-
verse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this
checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify
impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the
proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an
EIS is required.
Instructfons fqr Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic inForma-
tion about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to
determine wfiether the environmental impacts of your proposal are sig-
nificant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the Questions
briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best
description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the bes:, of
your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the quez-
tions from your own observations or project plans without the need to
hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question
does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not
apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary
delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreiine, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you
can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if_
you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will describe your pr,-
posal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submi`_
this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide addi-
tional information reasonably related to determining if there may :
significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonpr-oject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions
may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLE-
MENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in t}ie c}iecklist to the worcis
"project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "pro-
posal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
-1-
SPC!KAIyE EIVV I RONMEIUTHL VRDIIUl11VCE
t WrrL 197-11 9r:,V7' iS tzi .=ti.:. ro 1 I. 10. 130 k 1~
A. BAGI<GRUUNri
1. N3ml° o r Pr'o F'o s c'd L'f',j.Je c t: HR4'I t'W3N T.:iUo t3 s t, fV1t''
bui. 1di r1q. •
2. Namw- or Hvol irant: Prinq Gorpora+:ion.
3. riddres_ and ohvne number r,r apal lra.nt or conr;,ct:
nzrson= E. ESFiFi 5vr•3que F+vanuz, Saok:ane, Washinqton 992i2.
~5097 9::4--.1150.
I+. Ga te ch~erck:1 ist Prepare,j: FebrlJ3f'4 -4, 1985.
5. Hqe fir'U fi-qu e _tlfi q c t~c- c k:lls t_: SPuk:3fic- l,OUfii:~J LC. fi 1fiQ
Adj u s t.-3 r•.
o. Proposed tiRiinq ar :chedu1e ( inclu-d inq Pha=.ina) :
Spr i.ri 9 1.9E5.
73. Lo yuu h3ve 3fiU F13ri_ Tor ri-stijre 3-Jd itions, e:::oansion-I
or rijr+_her actavit.q t"ela.ted f0 Ur' c0nf~ectC-d W1}ti th15
Rf ~oPOS3lf F1l tf1oUQh tf'lZ 3PPj 1c3►1t OWf13 otflZr Pf ~oF`eC'f 1z5 lfl
t:hL iRime4i.ate 3rcy37 riv e;::R3nslofi Cl3n= 3f~e cofittrmPlateQ 3?
T:h15 +1Rie.
!b. DO 40U oWn Of' F13Ve Op}1Of15 Ofi l3rid ne3r•b4 a71' 3d.t3cz1'1f
to 4'I'ils RfqRos3l? F1FPl].Cafit cofitrol°_ ao.i-71ntnq 03rce1^ cc-r
submit+_e-j H^-,St'Ssol^' c m3R5.
E3. L..lSt afi!4 c-rivironmrri+.al lfit4rm3tir,r, Uql1 E::fi4W 3tioUr thi.i"_
has been prepared, or wil 1 be FrzQare-j, directl y rel3ted to
t:hi._ Pr-opr,,s31. TfiC- 3fiR1 J.c3ni_ fi3s cofi07tei:ed °.c-,1} tEst_: -:,T
}he subject provertu to determine the 1ocation or the
Of-EV)i,US D7.=.hm3f, LpJTP 3nd i_ht I].m1tg o! F+otEnr131 fiUll.]7.rIQ
a f'a?3° .
rY. r1o 40U 4;now LLIhPthCr 3ppi 1c3t14n5 3f-e pGfidinq ToI''
qoVLrnfTilrit3l 3PPfOV3l = oT otftlr t?fi7(?4s31= afrectinq t'I'il
PI"oPef t_y roVZr-A-j G4 4our Pf•opoy31 ! I\Irj ~?tl'ief• 3CR1 3 ._3tli. fi s
3.f`c- PL'nd].fiq.
ifa. Li.st any aovernment avpr-ova 1s or permit: th3t wi 1 1 be
ne~i:jcd 10r Ur,ur vrncosal, ir k:noWn. Euilo]fiq Fc-r•mir,
5vok:ane County, _ewaaka vrrmit.=., SR4k:a11e Countu He3i th
Gi str i r.k.
j j. GiVa.' Grieri coifiO lete deg.cf 1Rt1ofi of 4,:,IJf RroPo-31 -j
1ncj iJa1nq i:fle K'f oD45Li7 Utl: 3nd *f1e = 1 Zt 4T *f'IC
thi Slfc'. Pririq 1.,o1^pOf'3t]oIl f13= 3cQu ~r
lfed 3 ToUof3
dC3lrf_fi3F' 8fid 1= frrQulfed ti- oPEfate a 5ef41Ct- YaCll7t4 ~
fur the f''~?p37f~ ~iT (Oy~~t3 vehi~=ie=.. (Yie buil~iinq i=
/
~
aPvrQ:,:3Ma.tel14 16,#9500 sv. t*. 3rI sizc- with _.ervicc- bau
entr•ances al onq the nor th and west si-les. The biji 1dinq was
1oca.ked to the c-:<:treme east si~Je- of the orrspertu bec3use~ of
'instable soil cvnditiuns of the Lishman Durtio lor-atesl 31onq
the westerly rdqe ar the builoinq. V3f-13fir_es 3rr requirt-3
to assoire a proper sizzd builoing and avoid e;<tensive
excav3Tion a.nd reri l t inca of the aitiR,p 3rea._ ThE Pf GpCrty
over the dumP is plvzd and wil lcontinue to be used ror
Par•k i rtg,
12. Loc3tion of tr,z prop,:,s31 : The site is west uT 53rqent
Roa.d bc-rwc-en Fi.rsi: 3rid Src. ond HvEnuc-s.
D-Drs tf, z cr,,, s e d acti on 1 ie wi±hin the /iquifer OS
~5ensitive area (H ri The Gcrteral Sc-wer ServicE rirea. Th~
Rriori+:y Sewer Service Hre3%06 The Fropert.y i= locate~~
.T .,V
wi thi~~ i he r+~SA, GSSHi an~ NrPSrSr♦. The SRGk:3nE V31 1 e.4 SeWFr
trunF: is 1ocated in : nd Avenue iu3t South of the Fropert4.
B. FnIViRONi•iFiVTriL FI.Ei•IFI,4TS:
1. E3rtfi
a. General descri.Ption of the sitk: The sitz i=
9ra.ded t'lat and 7].es rpfi 'r_he edSC- of f.hc- Sc,ok:ant V31 lEU
T1oof IUSt north of thr qf-3f11.tz oUtcf~oF'P1nCs -71' f:fir Disfirriar,
Na.tural Area.
b. Wh3± i=- the steeaes± _.looe ar the site: Flat.
C. Wfi3±' qc-llef'3l I:tJPL-. QT °_.r-,1l5 3.fe toUfid r_.f. tfic- s-1te?
Doe_. ±hr s i te h3ve an y pri me farml 3nd? The i te G3rr ison
Gf'dVlI W7.f:fi S-DRiE c.verc-:,veri.nqs a= a fe=.ult -it tfic- Li._.hrnar,
Lumo. The site is not orime T31^mi3ri,j.
d. ArN *here _uri'a.+_c- ifio1c3t1Gfi~ of fi1=tof U of
linst1tle soils in the immadiate- vicinif4? Thz lari-jtil l
oPLr3i:liin5 of the D15FYRi3rt nufi1C? Fi3_- rEnoef-c--7 ±hc- WeStEf I U
:/3 r,f +:he lot useless ror bijil-iing structurzs. Thi3 3f•e3
uiill be u=ed rcnr naved :urfac:t- a3r~:inq.
c-. Lescribe trie cl.irvose, typL- 3nd 3pproximate l~.
quantiriEs of anu fillinq ar• gr3-iire9 cropr.~~ed, Tht: ~
s.->uthwest corner of the biji 1-jinq 3r-ea wi 1 1 nee-j to be
e;<:cavatrd and rc-t i 1 1 ed an,j e~r,moactNd *o 31 1 oW s+:a.bl c-
Gsjildinq Toundations t7 be iris*ai lad. The ba13nce of the
si te wi 1 1 rint be div*urbed e%t:cen* ror bui 1 dinq roo± i nq_ .
r. Coul d erosian occUf aP a rzsul }or •=1 e.3f lnqi
-o ri=#ructi.on or i-ise? N o . The si+e 15 f'3Ved.
C7. Hho Uf Wfi 3t per.=enr Cl f itfk e 51 te W1 1 1 rie ==Vn- f" ki'd
Wl) rtt{'LfV1i- iJ°_ SUI`T'A - 'r= til" t .Ef f'f-i.., irf -.7fa =.t.l"U.=~.1.=fI! Zlii-
s i te i urre n tlu p~ve d 10 0i. The s it-r wil I rzm3i ri Pavrd
~
arter cans }rur_tior..
h. Proposed mo-a4ures ta r•edu.=e c-r control erosion, ur
other impar*s ko ea.rth+ 1T anu: N •:,nc-.
HIR
3. What_ typz of emissions to the air w~~uld reslilt
rrom thE oriaoosal ti.e., du _.t, 3utomobile , ri dort,
in~lus+_rial, wood smoke) durinq tonstruction anod when the
Prr.jHG+.: i.s t4TRlet*d? t/L1f 1fiq c0fiai_f•uctloriv SomI e:Ch3U5t
fram Construction equiFmen+: 15 can+:emola.+.ed. UROfi
comFle+ion of tf,e t,uiidinq, same automoGi.la Emi_=ions aiil l
resutt frurt, cus.tomer vark:inq, movinq vehicles, 3nd
con*rollc-y tt_tinq 3nd monitorin9 of e-nqines durin9
toirie-ucs.
b. kre }her•e any off--site sources of ami=sions or
~jd .jr 4:h3t m3td 3Ti'Lct: U -jUf' PI opoc3I ?
Pruposed me3=.urrs to reducz or _ontrol emi=sion's
of Otrief].rt103Ct5 i"iD '.l.lf., ] C 3h_y~ N,jnl.
3. WHTER
a. Sli rt a._N:
( i) Is there any si_irr3ce w3±er bc.-Jy on or in the
] R,R,C,J]. xLi' @ V 7 c 1 n7. t _ y r l T tfic- S 7, tE (i ric1oJ -Ji rig V E 3 f' - f' outl d 3 fil7
;ea.sonal streams+ 3altw3ter, lak:es, ponds, wetlands)? No.
(c:) W111 tFYe r-equire any W4rk: oVEf•ti lft, Of•
-,d,acznt to (within 200 feet) of the described w3ters? No.
4 3) E_timate tl, e amo ur. -1 ot Till ari d d rc-o cle m3tcrial
thar wr:-uld be plaC@d ar f'zRioVl'd rrr,rr, S.Vf'T3Ce W3+c'r' or
wetlarids and indicai:e the arEa. of the =i.tc- tr,ar would be
3rrected, Indira.te *he shurce of the rill m3+_eri31. None.
(4) Wi l l trlr rrc-6:•co53l r r-QU ) f l = Uf 1 3C L warc-r
withdr3wls or. -diver-sions? Nri.
(5) Loc-= thc- or~~r~:,_,al lie withir, 3 100--year rl:,oa
clain? No.
(b) Does }he prap-,sal involvc 3ny di=-charaes of wa=te
rrtatEr i31 = to sur ra.cE watt-r No.
t. . Ground:
t 1 i Wi 1 1 ground w3ter btz wi thd r3wr„ or wi I 1 w3±.:.r bt~
d7=[fi3fQt4 qf -?u fi-j waircr? HI tfio UQf. 71_ ]5 3fit 1{]PAti-.-7
th zt hr PrnPer}y w i I I be 3t~1c- ±±ap int:, thc- C-,pk:ani
4-
ti
V31 ley srwer =.u_kc-rr„ an intrrim seotic tank: a~~~J dr3infiela p, 1~~.
J' frdN
systert, rtiay nee~j t~~ be ins+.al le-j ~~ntil tr~e searer syStzm iE
availab lF.
(2) Descrit,e waste material that wi 11 be discharqz-J
int„ tne ground Tf-ORi septic k3nk:s or t,thNr 33nitar_y waste
~ treatment raci1 ity. W!asti~ m3ter•131_wi 1 1 be 53n1t3f'm waste ~
i'f'tl.m f•c- £troi_~Qj~ ir~ }ha f~ac lI lt4. l7f'LdSNti r,l~ 3nd l1Jtiflcan*s ~
will bz culla~=tc~~j sc'F31`3f:e~1t~ and rii3Fo_•ed ±hrouqh wast~ ~il~
~rui
(3) De3cr-ibe an4 Systems, other +.har, thase desianed
r + f~e di.:Fo_31 ot =.ari i*aru waS te , ins±alled ror the
RUf pusB Of d1sChi31`!qlrtq T1 u ldS bcl -lw tfie qround surface
llncl U-jEs c.yctems SUch 85 thosE TUfhhC Q15(-'o5al oT' cFQfm
water or drairiaae Trum rloor dr3ins). The paved are3
rurrEntl4 li_.rs a druwcll i`or disposal ~:r surracr drainaqc-..
-fhz paved are3 wii 1 not be distijrbed and the dr.ywel l wil l
-=ontinua tc, runction rar drainaqc-. Root drain3ge rrom +.he
Guil-Jinc; will bz di:pused in drywells.
l4) W111 3fiU Cf'1Cm1c3l_ lesC@c13l ly orq3ft1c ':VlVtcfit'S
.;r petr•oleum fi-jets) be storzd in ,above ground or
ur~derclr•o~~nd st~~r3qr tank~__? vreast_., ~:,ils, lubri~_arit= ar,-y
snlventc wil l be ~~_.ed ir, the ~~per3ti~:,n ~~r fhe vetki~_le r
~ ~ ~ ~~lJ
rc-aa.ir ra~_:il i.ty irt ~.~-~_„r4a.r~=t wit _h .,t _,at _e anid lacai
requi.ra-*+a-+: rnr• hanalinca 3.R,7 -Sispos3i.
k 57 Wh3* Frotrctive measurE_ wil 1 bc tak:cr, tri invur%-&
*ri3t 1 e3k:, or sPi 1 1 s ot an,y chemi c31 sstored or used on
site wil l nc,i br 311o0~ed to aercolatE tr, qrriun-J water tthi= ~
inc1 udes measur ed usz d to E:: e e a t h e m ica 1 s olit „ f d ispos 3 1 ~
s4_*e ms d~scribc-d in 3bt2) and 3bk3) % The design of theN
1 repair r3ci 1 ity wi 1 1 incorporate are3se traps 3nd other
=Rc-C13~lq dEsiqried c4ftitd7.nR1ent SUSt_eRiS t~-, caf:rh qfe85c-5v
~i1=., lubri.ca.nts , and so lvznts, _ ,
Watrr- Runofi t inc lu.3 i.r~g vtr,rm Wdit5f )
Describe the sour,_z of ri.ir,off (inc1udina <.torm
wai:c-r 1 3fid me*ho,I .-r col lection an~J di=nosa1, i.f 3r,14
(j n-- 1 ude qU3fii= 1r1ZF 9 if k:nown Wh,--re wi l l thi= water
flow? Wi.l l+:hls W3tEf fI 7W in*r, oi_hef W3*i-f5? SUf'T3ti
water r•unorf is currently collected in 3dryweli nr-ar th~e
ccn*er of trii- 4Wlllf : h 1!? and *_nc p3f k:l fe41 df e3 WoUI d : -=-fit 1 fiUL
ko r•el u on t_F,i=• inst3l led t3i=11 i*y.
(2) Will anu cfiHrtilr_31= t--. sttired , h3ri-J 1E-j c,r u:~~i on
ttiG s i tz in 3 1oc3*ion where a spill or le3k: will dr3i ri to
sUf Te3L'L 4f qf ouno W3tef' Of r{, .3 =tof Ri WAtBf -71°_F•o53l = 4!E±'C-rts
d75cfiaf-Qlny tq -ijf-T3ce of n!'r.;und W3tc~f? NO
- n
~3i C r,1i l.:i iiia_rti, i.. -a tt~-ri als i- ntt~.r qr;,'A iP 0 or =Pj rfa:- ~•iQ'
u ii tk? r: % IVr.
L
J
i
d. ProPOSed me3_.urc-_. ±o reduce or control 5Uf't'3Ct'7 ~
qrounQi 3nd runorr Weit'cf imr•act=, ly dnV (1T *h@ Pf4P0sq--y
actidn lies within the Hquirer Sensitive Area). Be
e_.Feci.a114 c1ear on e:::pla.na}ion3 rclakinq tr, raci.lities
condernina 5zc+ions 3b(4), 3b(5), 3nd 3c(2) of this
check:1 i:t. U<<- „t ::;t:1=tinq =.torm wattr f$ci.1 ities. ~
' / e~
B. PLANTS
~
A. Lis* the veaet3tion found on site: None. Si}e i=
&nkirrlu caved.
~
b. What ki nd and 3mount of veqz±at ion wi 1 1 be remvvod
or at t:errd? IJGnz. Ser atuve.
-1. ProFosed landscaPi.na, use of n,ativz Flants, or
other mea_.ures to oresc-rvc- or wnh3ncc- veqrtation on *he
/
%_ika, if any= The applita.nts do not r~
F ~pose neni
la.ndsr-api.nq Untll sU{'h t1Rie 3s c,wner:.h1P= fC+ *fii: north rdf~ ~
~e c4f1s4l].d3tZd 3fld 3 j3fldsc3Rt? Rl3n 1s lflltl3ted fof tfie
i
, en+. i. re com r 1 e,<: .
~
~
5. Ani.m31s
a. L.ist birds 3nd 3nimal3 which have been obszrved on
4f ne3f- thC- _.).tE or 3f'C k:nown *4 tir ofi or fie3r *h@ =1.ti3:
Npne. The s i te i v 100% p3ved.
ti. L15* 3n4 thfe3tC:fir_d uf C-fio3fiqi-fi=d :PLrie= k:nown *o
be on or ne3r the si.+_e. Nonc-.
C. 1= the si ic- Par i: of a. mi qr at i on routc-? Nc,.
A. Pf'oC`o°_.t.d mt'3=.i.lf'2s t0 Pf`ts@rVe or ZnFi3nce W1 ldl1TP,
if anv~ iJone_
d. ENERG'r AND NATURAI._ RESOURCES
3. What E::lfl~~s of enr-r94 lc:: ler_tri ci fil.}Uf al Qa= s iUOOq
StoVct 50l3("/ W111 h~.' "=ed fo Rit't'f the comRleti-d Rf'o.iCct's
rnerq4 nc-eds? Descr ibt wh¢thc-r i.t wi 1 1 be used ror
heatina, manuracturina, et•_. Electricity and natur31 aa<_
will be 3V31l3file ror use withi.n ±he buildinq.
t+. Would your F~ro.iect affect the potential u:r of
=olar ener9u bu a.dAacen1: proprr*ie_ % No.
C. Wh3'f kinds of : ner4u ConSiCr'J3t1on Ti?3}Uf•@v 3rii
inrludrd in +he olans of this vrt,oo_al? Li:k othcr
rr~~po=.i-d maavUf'e_ to f•t°dUcL of' contf'O I enara4 ]mp3cts+ ] t
a n q ; T he ommer r i a 1 bui 1 o i n q w i 1 1 not h3 ve a. nq = P ecia 1
~
ener4 cor,servation Te3*urt?s.
7. EiJV 7 Ri iiuriE.iJTAL HF.r+LTF-I
a. Are there any anvironment3l he31±h ha.zards,
i nc1 uding expo=urH to to:<:ic r_hemic,al s, r i sV or r i.re an-J
Lxpl05701tig SR1~~ ~ , or h3:3f dOUS W3sfe7 }Fi3t ocr_Uf` a5 3
f'L£Ulr GT thls RroF'o5d~? No. E::Roa.uf-t: t'ii tolvc-nts and
other Ch2mic31: uiould conTorm to indUStry v3fet4 pr3ct1ce_.
(1) Descri be =Peci.31 cmc-rqency srrvires. *hak mi9ht bc
requi red. None.
(2) Proposed measures to f'Aduce or control
environmi:ntal F,ealth hazards, if anq: None.
b. No i=.e :
(i) Wha* tyPes or noise exist in the 3rea which m3.y
a.rrect: yUUr Ff o.it-ct. (ror E;:3mole: trairic, Equipment,
operations, other)? Hddx*].oI'13l nai:e Qt?fit'(`3tlll9 3c*ivitied
woul d be c:4nTi ncd to the i nkt-ri.;,r• of the t,ui 1oin9. 7hc-
sitc: i= c"rrentl4 a F3rk:lnq lot with noi=.4 rrom ±r3rric.
(2) What kmre=_ and levtls of noise would t•e crea.tc--j
bU Of 35soc13}Cd Wlf:h the F`f•o.iect ofi 3 Ghor•t-term or 3 lonq
+:trm b3si._• ii'or c-;:3mple: traffi.c, cofi5*fUC*lon, operation,
other? Indicate WFl3f hours noise would come from the sitr.
SriUf't tEf m cons}fUctl un a.c*7.V1t1a5 W7.ll 7 ncre35N fi415E
levels durina d341igh} ho"r-=. The buildina will conrine
n41sC t'f'URi the {.Ulie_up oT r--n9i.nes W].thln. The UPZ'f3tlori
wil 1 bE confined +_o norm3l business hours.
(3) Propo=.ed me35urc- to rt-duce or control noi_c-
imFac+.s, i f any % No sPeci31 mea_.ur•e=..
(6, ~ L.HND AfJD SHORF I I NE USF
~
a. Wha* is the tUrf•ent us4 or ±r,e =.ite and ad.i3Ci?nt
Fro['erti.e=? The :Ub.iC-ct pr4pErtq i°_ a p3rk1fi9 14t T!.r
Nppl@W3y CfieVf~olrt, It 3ls7 contains 3 SRIaIl f1@W C3f
Rrepar3t iofi bUl l47 fi9' 3lqnQ the nof th S 1dE. La.nd US@s tq thc-
north 1nClUdZ 3n 3otoRiobllZ St?f V1cC' cZrltZf 3f1d 3n
3UtomGfi1lE s3le= 1ot. Land U:Bs to the We5} 7fiClUde
3nothrr car d,-r.al ershi p. Use3 tr, the e3st inc1 ude a former
br,d4 shoP which 1= nrSW u=ed to servicF cars. Fr-ooerties to
the south inc1ude v3c3nt proPerties and some houses alona
S3rqent R„ad le3dinq in*o the Lishman Hi11= Natural Fife3.
b. Has +f„e -.i±s bter~ ~~~ed ror anricul±urc% N;,.
C. Gr-._criGt- an" =tructurc-= on the nitc-. Thc-- =ice
contain ; a 32' 150' new car creParat? on buil d1nq which
7
i
W1 I I f C:rti3lfi.
d. Wi 1 1 ,anu _.+_ructurzs be demol ished % No.
E. Wfldt 1°_ tfiE currerit ztini nq _13CQ_1T1c3t),ofi ijf triL
Slt@? CoRiRie f'c ldI .
t. What is th.t current comorehensive plan de<.ianation
of 1- he si. * e? C i, IT. ITi r~ r• r 1 3 1.
Q. What is the current shorel ine ma.ster Froara.M
de= i.ana*i.on or thte sii:H? nfr,ne.
h. Has any Fa.r± or tr,e 3+:~ been ~=1as=-ifie~j ai 3fi
"envi rc~nmerital 1 u s~ r~=itive e 3r~a7~ No.
i. HRFro;<:imatel.y how many PeoF1e would rzsi~~e or wor-k:
in thae compl r+:ed Pf 4.iFC*? The aUto ri:pair rar=i l i ty w~jul d
emplo.y approximately 15 to 30 addifional ReUFIe.
-i. riPPro,::imaTe 1 4 IloW tnart U Pe -:,ple wr,uld the romvlE±ed
Pro.,zct disolace % None.
k:. ProPOsed me3stires ta avo,id or reduce displacement
imva.~.-.t=, i.f any: iq 1:1 ne.
1. PruPO3ad measi.ire= to en=.sire ±fre Fr•opova i i:
COmvatitlc wi.th e;::i=.tinq 3nd PrU.~ected land uses ,ari-i alanr•,
i.r any: Thz bui 1 ding wi 1 1 conror•m to o±r,zr ,=ommNrcia 1
ac+ i.vi.± i cs i re }he i.mmidia.ke ar-ea.
9. Ho~USING
a.. AoFro:<imati~- l 4 how rti3n4 u ri i t s w-Dii l d be provi~e d + ir
3fiU? )fo-j].cs7_tiL 41tiLS:hif' fi]qfi v Ri1dd I Cr7 {if' I oW-1fi._4RaL ho u_7.f.q.
b. Apprh;::im ate1 4 h W Ria. llU Urs lti9 1T 3fi 4+ WOu~j f~c
~-1 i_mina.kt-d? iV---- rre_
Pr-,po'-.ed iTIC35ll(''t?: to f`l~-juce or control r1oU=-1fIQ
Lmpa; t.=. v 7.1 3fi U= IVo tie.
io. AESTHETICS
•3. Wha* is thr tal le-t heial-it of 3ny prvposed
:*ru,=tijre t--7), n04- i ric1 udi ng ante-nn3= ; what i= thc-
arinr_ipal z.-:terior bijil-jinq material Fropo=.ed%
E-IJ) 1 -1 1.riq;. W{iuld t!l l].m1re--j t'o A 4nL° =-f.i-(y --CImmc-rr73l
r-U]l-diria. E-:<:teri-?f Ri3tLf13I: haVc not beefi _.~~ecti'd lfi tfic-
d e ~3 q n t h,- b u 1 I7 i r, q.
~
b. What views iri the irrime-jiate vicinity woulid be
al *c-red ur obstructed % N o nc- .
Propose-j measur-e=- t-:, rrduce or _ontro1 aes.the±lc
imva C k:.. it` anu: No nc_
i i. LIGViT AND GL.ARFi
3. Wh3} type of light or qlare will the propos31
vroducc-? Wha.t time ot` da_y would it ma.inlu .:,ctur? Tf,c-
oark:iriq 1 ot area is currently lighted.
b. Could 1iQht or 913rc- rrom rh,-- ri.nisn.:d ar~:,.~ect be
a s3ret4 haz3rd ur inta_rfere with view37 No.
WhaF ~:r.i.stiriq i,tf -site =.r_-urceT ot 1 i9ht Gr G13fe
aiau arrect .ypUr proposal? None.
d. PI--oRosc-d measlir•es tr, re-i~ice or control 1 iqht and
q13r.e imp.zc*s, if any: None .
i RE CFFHT 1OiV
3. Wh3} dz57qn3ted a.n-J inr--,rm31 recre3tianal
opportufii.tirs are lfi ffee 11TeIT~edl3Fe V1c]n1t4? D1vf1Ro3fi H iI I=
Natural arza, appro;<im3te1 .y 1/4 mi le kv the a4Uth on
Sarqt rtt Road.
b. Woul d ±hp ProPosed pro.iec+_ disP13ce a.n.y exis+_in9
re•-rea*i.onal uset? Nu_
c . Proposed measur•es to reduce or con*rol 1TF`3cts on
rCcfN3t:lont 1rirlU-jlfi9 f-lcrea.tir„~re r,pvurtuni.ties tU til
arovidcd by kho Fro.,ect or• a.pplic3fitr ir 3n4: None.
~
~3 . ~11 ST i ~R 1 C AND CUL TURAL PFESE FiVAT ION
%
~ a. Are ther•e 3ny p13,_cS Or Ob.iect~ 1 isted on, cor
Ff r!po=Cd T of fiA.t j r-ri3l + 5ta te+ qf 1oc3 1 Pr-HSC rva* iofi
raj cters F:nown tri bz on r,r ne t;, thc- = i t e : No ,
t,. G~-nc- ral 1 4 de° -=rlbe 3ny 13n-3 marks or c-vi~]cri=c- .~f
histri-= archat- olo9ic ai, _=ientific , o r- c ultur3l import3n.-r
kro o wn kc, be on t+r nE;::} to thH site. iVone.
C. Provo^Ed Rir$sUf'ls }o f~~ducc~ Of ~cot7tf•ol 1mR3._fsi lT
anoo Noni:.
I'1. TRHI'JSPO~RTt+T1C-IN
C{
1
. l .
Identiry plibl io= streets aned hiqhways s.ervina the
sitt, and dc-scribe Rroaosed 6rr_a5t *i.. *fie e:<:istinq str-eet
syatem. The prvFertu is strved Gy Sarqent St. 3nd First
AveriuE. Second HV@fiUE is e;<C3VdrEd ror thH Val ley Sewtir
trsink: and no street has bzen established. The local street
_ 4stcm _onr~ecr: to SRra.que Avcmnlje.
b. 7s the site current1 y served bv Rubl ic transit?
STS i.n Spragur Avc-ntiH.
C. How rri3n4 Farki.nq spaces would the completed
Pro.iec* havc? PEr ordinance reVuirement, thE bui.ldi.nq
woul d utit ize 57 or the existinq P3rk:inq svaces to the
wEFt,
d. Wil l tht~ proposal I^equire anu new roads ur
st.rEets,p r_,r impr c,vEments ta c-xis.tiriq fo3ds 4r c.tr0et:57 no*
including drivetdays% Nu.
e. . Wi 1 1 the pro,iect use (or occi-ir in the immediate
vicini.#y of) ujatc-r, rail, r.r air tran-porta}ion? No.
r. Hc-uf many vehicle ±rips Fer• day would be Qeftier3ted
G4 thN c0[i1R 1eti Q prqjert ? HPL'ro.<:11Ti3tel 4 125 Rc-f d34.
9. Pf'oF`o5t?d RI@15Uf'L : tq f•edUce VI` r_ontrol
±ran=.p_,ri_ai:ior, imoacr5t 1T anu= PfoPlf df']VLW34 efitf3nce-s.
i5. PUBLIC SERVICES
z. Wolild +.hz Fro.iect reslilt in an increased need for
aubl i-:: :Bf'VlcE5 tTpl^ e:camcle: rire protectiLon, col i-_E
protertion, heal*ti care, schoolsi a*her)? The a.rea is
currEntl y usc_ Tt.r fc-nced vehicular- ct,;r3gE, Additiona1
Put,l ic services associ3*ed wi+_h +:he new bui idina woul d be
rr, i.nimal.
h. Proar: sed RIe3suf e5 to f zducC uf cofitf'-} I tjlf ,':-c}
1mpac1"s of, pUb11C Si?fVlceSr 11' 3ri U. 1~4fi C-,
ic~. UTILITIES
a. List litilities cur-rently 3V3?lable a± thd sit,?.:
Gi_hm3n Wat_Pr Lis4rirt, W.W_P. nati-iral q3= 3fid r1Ec#ricifu.
P. N. B. te 1 eoho rie , Sp~>k:3ne Gount y sewer ( whc n 3V31 I 3D I e ) .
b. Ue= ~-r i bc- *hc- 1i t i. 1 i ti Es '7 h3t ,arc- proco se -1 tor th,e
Cf 4jer_t, the uti 1) ty provid ina the service+ 3ri-j the qener3l
cnn_.truc fio n a: ki.vi tiEz r. thc- s) te or in thc- i mmcd iatE
v i c i nitu uihi_h rto 3 qf, t br nee-le .j_ Uta I i±ic-s 3rk> aener3l 1 y
ava3.labic- in ao ini r. q =t.re r-r=. Pur•.-iU~~r, art~. i na,~-at,-o
v r- .
. . i
. ~
~ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE ~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above
responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also
understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or
willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with-
draw any declaration of 6onsignificance that it might issue in
reliance upon this checklist.
PRING CORPORATION
Date: February 5, 1985 Proponent•
(Please Print or
Proponent: Address: ~,~/lf1,~Q
, (i
Phone
Person completing form: Yl Date:
/
Phone: ql~?
7 ~
FOR STAF'F USE ONLY
~
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: J
Based on this staff review of the environmental ch cklist and other
pertinent information, the staff:
A. X Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse
impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance.
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse impacts do exist
for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated deter-
mination of nonsiKnificance with conditions.
C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse impacts
and recommends a determination of signifieance.
!I
OF TSE
: r ~ f'3 ~
s PoKANE couNT Y , . . . ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT" ~ ~ ' - - -
1'JfJI ~
T To Garv Nel son/Bob McCann
From Paul a Mi 1ler, Zoning Ac~justor Secretary ' . _ . - .
,
Sabject Fi 1 e VE-225-94
Daft February 5 9 1985
When you review this project for our February 27th hearing, Tom Mosher woul d 1 ike
specific comments upon the proposed 2nd/3rd Avenue couplet iri regards to this
si te. •
Thank you.
~
.ti
JpN!!' A _
G~
Ric(A.
~
. _ - _ - - -
. - - - -
c~ j~ ..Ti^,ocrS ~t/lQit. , A~
v ~
. . 1~~r~.. . SPQKANE COUNTY PIANNING DEPARTMENj
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Ce rtificate of Exemptian No.: Application No.: Y~~e4~L~ v
Name of Appl i cant: Pring CorAOration
Street Address: E. 8500 Snrapize Avenue
City: Svokane State: Washington Zip Code: 99212 Tele. No.: 924-1150
Name of Property Owner(5): pring Cornoration
~
~Requested Action(s) (Circle Appropriate Action): r~m
~ Variance(s Conditional Use Permit Administrative Appeal
Temporary rermi t Waiver of Viol ation Other:
Zero Lot Line Non-Conforming LotJUse
* FOR STAFF USE ONL1' *
~
~
~ Cite Ordinance Section
* Section Township fRange Pro perty Size: 0GVuJ *
• :"U ~S:' ; r,¢ ~l~~L - ~~C~~A
~ Existing Zoning: Comprehensive Plan~,Designation:,~~?~,~./~~,~ ~r *
.
Legal Checked by: l,lVY4`~ Hearing Date:.-'~ c', Receipt *
* * * * * * * * * * * I~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Existing Use of Pmperty: Paved narking and automobile storaae lot
Proposed Use of Property: Automobile service center and narts buildine
Street Address of Property: -9*eond & Sargent. S.W. corner.
Leqal Description of Property (include easement if applicable)
Rlock 6, 'niest Dishman Addition, Snokane County, Washinjqton
Section 19, Twv. 25N., R. 44 E'o!M.
Parcel 19541-0601-9 Source of Legal: Appl.icant
Total -amount of ac~joining land control Ted by this owner/sponsor: 7 acres
What interest do you hold in the property: owner
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
None
I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHQRIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSEO SITE.
IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/
HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED.
PRING CORPO:L4TION
Si gned : By • v p,s,G - Date : 1 121/85 Address : Eas t$500 Spr~ie Ave., Spokane, IJash. 99212
i~
_ Phone I • 924=1150 v
- ~ ,
~ NUTnfcY SFX ~ NOTARY : ~l~l~c/ / Q~ • -
. . .
- - ` . : DATE :
• .
A. VARIANCES
l. In view of the above information, what special circurnstances (beyond your
control or actions) deprive you of the same general rights and privileges
of other prvperty owners within the sanie zone and vicinity?
""l(• .1^'.)11 C-i!lf: :;E'eli7 varianc e^ t- `1.C'i r-e2'V1.Ce C@T1f
;)aI^ i`,5~,~17_r11_rtr' +n rnma wi-ti ;n 1^ `,pE~t-r 4' qarc-ca nt Rnari_ 1n PpP+
~econd A~•e~~ue, and 22 PPpt. nf ~'irst Avent.~e with an ovPrnead cannr~.~
extendin~- te t'le strPet1 Th~ r t- .i t.r;:0 nnrti r~(~ f the rlo .k in t}e_
former ~JIshman D~arnn, wh~.c}; ic un~-t;at~1e for ~'alldinirs. To avoid the
unstable area, the buildinr must re nla.ced as far east on the nrqx~er*v
as nossi ble. First Avenue i s ar extra wic~e .;tree t of ~'2 feet. (See t~elow?
2. If the variance were granted, how would it affect neighboring properties
or irrrprovemrtts? The annlicart rnntrolq Uy"nnArti eS to the nor~h -nnd
east of the nroposal. The annlzcant !:as also particinated in the
jedication of addi tional ~trins alpn-a Snxgent Rnad f,or .r/w Durposes
and is nrorosing the vacation of First Avenue at such time as (See beZow)
B. X~JMD~~4~J~{DtLY;tJBg~x~FR~~XYM4~G;C0i~Y~K~Q4#'D~~~~£XX~AKA~~~~fJ6X:C~X
~X X;{~1~I~:'.fj i Y~SXcK~4~i~~X~~f ~~#~{l}:~SF7~t~X~i$S~6X7[K7Q~NCXD({~$[Q~9Ck~t'.~.XliONJ'75X1[~
X YXX~¢ k~~$Cu6~i ~ Y~~~C~~C~~C `b`~M~CrX~1~K17D~5X X8[tXdC K
Seconcl Avenue rs established See enclosed deeds and apreements with
Snokane County. The setbacks requested conform to other building
setbacl;s in the llishman Commercial district wh.ich has been p2atted and
developed with urban setbacks. The buildin~ is required to servie
Toyoza vehZCles as par~t of' new f'ranchzse,~aealershiP agreements. !'he
block is currently paved and fenced to the $tretts. The anplicant is
the primary user oz- etireet s,ystems in the vicinity. `rne ad~rent of
the Spokane Valley sewer trunk •,v i?.1 a l low SP_C np,rj Avenue to be devel onPd
to servea tne are:~.
C.
D. SIGir-OFF BY COUPiTY DEPARTMEii7S
1. >COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT `Z
A Prel imi narY consul tation has been hel d to di scuss the pmpos al . The
applicant has beeR info rnwd of requiremerrts and standards.
(Signature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived
by Planning Staff)
2.) COUN7Y ENGIfVEER' S DEPARTMENT -1';0
G'
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
app i~ar~t has b R'nforn~ed of requi rements and standards.
r 12-lN'
S~gnat) (Date) (Sign-off Waivpd
~ by Planning Staff)
_ 3. ~ COUIJTY UTILITIES DEPARTMEIV~
J A preliminary cQnsultation has been h to discuss the '
P'
dnDl1C?!1t haq hPPf1 lf]fC11Tlr-dl )f ~nri nAar ri -
(
by i-'larining _5tatf )
.=W,~TER PURVEYO (if applicable) Name:' 1J;s~r~,,,ani (,t,,
a) The prQposal ~]s/ not located within the boundary of our s2r.vi•ce araa.
b) Wq-are/are not ab]e to serve. this site with adequate watrr- -
c) Sat`Tsfactory arra gements(.~ave; i~rve rrot been made to ser5ce' prupos;:l .
.44 i~L~' /2//d ~.._T..-_.
ignatur~ (Sign-off udaived
by Planninq Staff)
~ ' . i , I r~' 3. ~ ! 'y ~ ~,'~irc- . - '1/ ~`I ~r, i
~ I • t / 1 ~ ~ _ ~ ~y. i _ L f1 ~ - - ~ -'1
~L:~.~X..
.
~ , r ~ ,(1 . ~ ~ 1 f
Uolicirs
~I { . , ~Ji i P41t~- - ' .
{ . ' _..-•".t~, ~.-..~;1?~..~i,' -1
I' ~ ; - , •'~2•.y: I
b►1:
~ • ! _ _'~t - ~ , ct. _ .._.1 - By_
- - . _ . _ . . . ~+.+r
~I
I
DISHMAN BAANCH 1253
I
N e~,/ SEATTLE-fIRST NATIONAL BANK
L WQ CLvwlet ~VGe SPOKANE. WASMINGTON
~ PHUNE 914-1150 t E B500 SPRAGUE AVE DATQ 3aT1• 211 1985
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 t9-2~ t250
PAY r• . . ~ on
20.00
, '
TO TMt OROMR Of
1~2~ / r Ji1C'. I
Spokane Coiinty Isngineer ~/-/~7• l
BY ~C_~ ^X-t'~. :.~T /r-' C' ~ \
i: L 2 50000 241: i?o ie io 21"
oATE r) ER I vr1 uN ~ c.HECk No i~ REFERENCE I
~ 1253 NUMBEA
I CONTROL NO. I ACCOUNT NO. II AMOUNT I KEY
+
I I 2R1 II ~ _
I I II ~
► I II I I ~
I I II ~ I-
I I II I I~
I I II I I•
I I II I I~
I I II I
I I II I~ ~
~
I ~ -
~ rNiS CFierK iti 7 ErvUEnEG iN FUi.i PnrMENT OF INVOICES IISiED ABOVE
Ssoo s,o", ?U&,ik 99.206 ~ 9.24-ff50
~ -
()J
' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . / ' ~ ~ .
r ~
/ .
_ ,
Gv,- ( D ~j
~ Cr►C- -~o 'L J e7- ~-+2 y f'V. ~ o ~ vi ~ •J
~ ~-~l 6 ~ '~~J % onJ C0 .✓nir~ r~ ~ ~ . ~
_ ~ c S 1- ~ ~ M~ ► G 1~1 ~O +4. ~ TN 2u j7t s-! ►a ~ .
,
QFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
pot- Februarv 13 19 85
Inter-office Communication
Te Gary Kennaly
Fror„ Bob McCann an4'~ry Nelson
}J ,
Sub%ect varianrn Apnl ication VF ??5-RA; Pring Corp_~ppleway Toyora '
Attached is a copy of the above-referenced variance application and site plan.
The public hearing is scheduled before the Zoning Adjustor on February 27, 1985.
Before responding to the application request, we need to have the following questions ~I
answered.
1. Do we have a policy regarding access to 2nd Avenue (related to Milwaukee I
Road, etc.)?
2. Is there a policy regarding building setbacks along 2nd Avenue?
3. Will we require improvements to lst and 2nd Avenues prior to building permit
release? If so, what is cross-section (typical) for 2nd Avenue? What will
it be for lst Avenue? Where will improvements be constructed given the width
of right-of-way? ,
4. Do we need 20 foot radii at lst and Sargent and 2nd and Sargent?
5. Will we require all street improvements with building permit application?
BMc/GSN/set
Attach.
I
I
' OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dab- February 27 19 85
Inter-office Communitati
Tt- Spoka unt Zon justor
frorr _LC°be r, P. Spokane County Engineer
t .
Subject Variance Application VE 22-5-84 Pring Corporation
Iwould like to request that the public hearing of the above referenced variance
application be continued for a period of two weeks. Thie will permit time for
representativea of the Engineer's Department to meet with the applicant and discuas the
County's plan for the improvement of both Sargent Road and 2nd Aveaue.
Second Avenue has been deaignated as a major tranaportation corridor. Sargent Road
will function se a principal meane of accesa to Second Avenue. This will have a
substantial influence upon the development of the property affected by this
application. Of major concern is accesa to Second Avenue and Sargent Road ae well as
setbacks along First Avenue, Second Avenue and Sargent Road.
RST/eh
, , .
• OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dah February 27 19 85
Inter-office Communicoti
Spoka unt Zon justor
Tr
Fron► ""be r, P. Spokane County Engiaeer
~
Sub*' Variance Application VE 22-5-84 Pring Corporation
I Would like to requeat that the public hearing of the above referenced variance
application be continued for a period of two weeks. This will permit time for
representatives of the Engineer'e Department to meet with the applicant and discuse the
County's plan for the improvement of both Sargent Road and 2nd Avenue.
Second Avenue hae been designated ae a ma,jor traneportation corridor. Sargent Road
will function ae a principal stane of accese to Second Avenue. This will have a
subetantial influence upon the development of the property affected by this
applic8tion. Of major concern is acceas to Second Avenue and Sargent Road as well as
setbacks along Firet Avenue, Second Avenue and Sargent Road.
RST/ah
/A/'
-27- S 5
!')Y4i'vK S - 1
e;✓;oa 5 ~~+.r'~ r _
'iTS7oe1.e-lf Ga'n • f r.~1 ,vy ~sseyr ~vYL da.lu~+ue ~.1 •
eu,
/7 ~Iv~a,
I ~ f'_~,~
n 1, / 7
-P.l'11-c( fi,It? G? n. , . , J
l,~ . .
,
COUNTY ENGINEER
•T--a j ~ _ ! - j~ ~'t ROBERT S. TURNER
COUIVTY ENGItVEER
99260
~'i%'UM: Gary Kenn:tlv ~:,~•.~K
f'hc Ci,unty F'nkinr.er hah reviewQd the above-titlEd variance with tlw }io;ii,i
"t (-o<<nty Commissioners, and the Engineer's staff has discussed a number of
concerns with the applicant. 'fhis applicant previously requested the vacatiun
,)r : 6,- lst Avenue right-of-way adjac•rnt to the property under consideratiucl.
[t the tst Avenue vacation was approved, additional property would hec()m(~
,i.-ailable to the applicant and a uew plan could [hen be developed. Since tt:i5
C,.uld result in a possible remedy to the applicant's present problem, this
0.partment would request, on behalf of the Board pf County Commissioners, a
continuance of the hearing to an unspecified fu[ure date. The Bord coul(i
:q,,ain consider, at a pubZlc hearfng, tfie lst Avenue vacation situation a,1d
malce a final determination on the matter. Apprnximatel.y 4 to 6 weeks are
needL•d for the Board to process a right-ot-wa_y vxi•,ition action.
'I'hank vou For yonr add i r_ ionat ci)ns ideration.
,
~pokdlle. w85f1111( t0l1 91)2bn 45h
. i
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR - PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA: Februa'ry 27, "1985
TIME: 1:15 P.M.
PLACE: Spokane Caunty P1 anning Dept. , N. 721 Jeffer5o►► 5t, , 2nd flqor hearing room
B. VARIANCES
* 2. VE-22-5-84 RELAXATION OF FRONT YARD SETBACK AND RELAXATION
K
`enera' y loca ed on ihe southwest corner of
, lst Avenue and Sargent Road in Section 19-25-44.
,
RECEIYED PROPOSAL: To allow an automobile service center
and parts building to be located 22'
FEB 11 1985 from the front property line (lst Ave.)
whereas, Section 4.10,080 (dl ) of the
SPOKANE GOUNTY ENGINEER Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requi res
a 35' setback f rom the property 1 i ne
or a 65' setback f rom the centerline of
the roadway ri ght-of-way ; whi chever
provides the greater setback from the
roadway ri ght-of-way . i n the Comne rci al
Zone. A1 so , the appl i cant p ropases
to locate a 20' x 12' canopy which
would extend to the fmnt property
line (lst Ave.), whereas Section
4.17.035 (c) of the Spokane County
Zaning Ordinance requi res that canopies
maty be canti levered or projected
from the building into the front ar
flanking yard area not more than 10'.
The applicant is also requesting a
l ~,e front yard setback of 10' from Lhe
front property line on 2nd Avenue
(see Section 4.14.090 (dl ) of the
Zoning Ordinance. Alsd being requested
is a flanking street setback of 10`
from the f l an king stree t proper ty
1 ine (Sar gent Road), whereas Section
4.10.080 ~d3) of the Spokane County
Zoning Or dinance requ i res a 2 0' set-
~ back from the property 1 ine or 50'
setback from the centerline of the
roadwdy right-ofi-way; whichever pro-
~ vides the greater setback distance
from the centerline of the roadway
ri ght-af-wa~y.
.a~~ITE SIZE. 1.58 acres (approx. )
APR-nART: Pring Corporation, c/o John Konen
-2-
I~" 1 7
l~
~
~ . • r o ea
~..K t
= 1 ~
_ _a Q
r - . ci
~ .
d w^~ -
s~ ~ W N_ + f ~ N 1
„!nG +`r. , ' .
z "
v ~ i • a V
.,ritb • ~•i r~n• a; n i N~ f O M 3 1 ~ 0
_ ~ ~04~• ...4 < y ~ a•r~.
.tj -
~
31Z ~ Zp ` ` - • .
h ,r-
,
HvE._ .
- ~ ~
toriu~ I ~ ' L
~U ` EtGH r
~ 1 c • ' ~ \ 1--:
~ ~ 1 __~.~-~t ~ l -c"•.+F~r
_r--- • 8 " '
~ _
~ 225
` •4
•4~I' 1
1 \`,\t ~~.j, ^ ~
' G
~ 4,~~ -o •
i °^•`-~.,:t„ `
~ ~
- •
t '
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Doto~ I9 _
Inter-office Communication
' ~ t.0ik11t~;,Lv
Tr
Fror-
Subject
!on he ccntinued tor a perion of two weeks. This will permi~ tirne :
~L:s~nCatives ar the FnkinPer's Deperr_ment to meet w{t}) [he appiir
'v's plan for Che improvement or both Sargeni Roaci and 2nd iwen,
c,nnc_' Avenue has heen designa[eci L;s a maior transportation rorr
i!nc:inn as a principaI means of access to Second Avenue. Thi.s w:ili iiav;
„ir.[i fl inililPnce upon the developmetit of the propPrty arfecteci bv this
rn - . ~ . ~c ~ , _
c 0
~ .
SPOKANE COUNTY 20N.ING•ARJUSTOR - PUBLIC HEARING
AGENDA: FEBRUARY 27, 1985
TIME: 1:15 P.M.
PLACE: Spokane County Pl anning Dept. , N. 721 Jefferson St. , 2nd floor hearing room
B. VARIANCES
* 2. YE-225-84 RELAX TIO OF FRONT YARD SETBACK AND RELAXATION
OF FL~IVKI~G STREET SETBACK
Generally located on the southwest corner of
lst Avenue and Sargent Road in Section 19-25-44.
PROPOSAL: To allow an automobile se rvice cente r
and parts building to be located 22'
from the f►ront property line whereas,
Section 4.10.080 (dl) of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance requi res a
35' setback from the pmperty line or
a 65' setback from the centerline of '
the roadway ri ght-of-way (1 st Avenue) ;
whi chever provi des the greater setback
from the centerline of the roadway
ri gh t-of-way i n the Comme rci al Zone.
Also, the applicant proposes to locate
a 20' x 12' canopy which would extend
to the front property line, whereas
Section 4.17.035 (c) of the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance requi res that
canopies may be canti levered or pro-
jected f rom the building into the
front or flanking yard area not more
than 10'. The applicant is also
requesting a flanking street setback
of 10' from the flanking street propert.
line, whe reas Section 4.10.080 (d3)
of the Zoning Ordinance requi res a
flanking street setback of 20' from
the property line or 50' from the
centerline of the roadway right-of-way;
whi chever provi des the greater setback
distance from the roadway ri ght-of-way.
SITE SIZE: 1.58 acres (approx. )
APPLICANT: Pring Corporation, c/o John Konen
-2-
10 . ~ ~ , • ~
~ ~ 1, • ~ p, i 1` = V U
~ Q a N~
W - ~ ~tAY
W t~. v 1~ ~ _ (L
~ N
~ r.
. ~ ~ tiA •".NrtBN
,..4len• 7
. e s v~
~ f tS h Q~ , ~
.r _ •
4~~..u ~ M • • r
' ` y L. • ,
\ ,1
} 4~
• l , ~ ~r
t ,W ?
' f4rru~ ~4 .
t , .rp
• - It ~
~
~ ti9 r ~ :~"r►~--~
_ ,.2
~ . ~
~
V :I 9N.1 ~-10
} 1
~ 1• ~
~ y:aoc
_1` ~ ;..T
' ~''t ~ ~ - -
~ ~ 1
J~
r:
• c~~ n [7 7r,~~s ~ ~ f : ~ _ C)
~ . SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
'AFPLIeATI0NS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR/BOARO OF ADJUSTMENT
.
1
Ce rtificate of Exemption No.: Application No.:
Name of Appl i cant: Pring Cornoration
Street Address: E. 8500 Spra,-ue Avenue
City: Snokane State: Washington Zip Code:,, 99212 Tele. No.: 924-115c
Name of Pmperty Owner(s): Pring Cornoration _
Requested Action(s) (Circle Appropriate Action):
Variance sPemit Conditional Use Permit Administrative Appeal
Te~nporary Waiver of Violation Other:
Zero Lot Line Non-Conforming Lot/Use
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ac * * * * ~ * t t * ~t ~r * ,t * * r * * * * ,
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
~
* Cite Ordinance Section:
* Sectivn Township Range Property Size:
ic
* Existing Zoninq: l ~ Comprehensive Plan Oesignation:
* Legal Checked by: Hearing Date: r.' !Y;~` Receipt
Existing Use of Property : Paved narkine and automobile storaze lot
Pmposed Use of Property: Automobile service center and narts buildinz
Street Address of Property: Second & Sargent, S.W. corner.
M
Leqal Description of Property (include easement if applicable)
Rlock 6, 'nlest Dishman Addition, Snokane County, Washinptan
Section 19, Twp. 25N,, R. 44 P_",rJM.
Parcel 19541-06o1-9 Source of Legal: Applicant
Total -amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner/sponsor: 7 acres
What interest do you hold in the property: owTier
Please list p revious Planning Oepa rtment actions involving this prope rty:
None
I SWEAR THA7 I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE.
IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMIS5ION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/
HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED.
PRING CORPO:tATION
Si gned : gy' ' Date :14211R5
_ Address: East 8500 Spr~ie Ave., Spokane, [Jash. 99212
. Phone fJ • 924 1150
, Nl1T_AR-Y ;SEt+L NOTARY : , Lc/ / ~ , _ _ -
-DATE :
- V
- - -
~ • .
, RIGHT OF WAY pEED ~ •
IN TIIE MA'CTEit aE ct+e ...SA~~..~OAD................. ....~vTO...~9~0......._.....
KNOVI' AL1. 11'[EN BI' THCSE YRESCNTS, That................................................... . ~
and his wife, of the Cuunty of 5pokane.
in tltr State of Washington, in consideration o( the benefits and other valuable considerations, and thr sum
of Uollars, pai(i ..by the County uf Spokane.
ttir receipt whc•rcof is herrby atknowledged, have granted, bargained, sald and conveyed, and by thtsr
prrsents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane Cuunty, the folloN•ing described parcel of land.
situated in Spe{:ane County, in the State of 1h'ashington, to-w•it :
A portion of the Xorthvoot Quartsr (IW) of the Nortboa+rt Quartv (XW) sore particul,arl ~
desaMboid as tol].ovs: Beai,anina at a poiat 1506 iNt wst aad SO iMt sonth •t the
northwt aorsar of fieation 19, Tovnship 25 1br'th, Raase 44 S.Y.N.; thenco roath
150 tat= llence rest 28 feet; thenc• north 150 ioot; thma• sut 28 ioot to tha
Poiat of Beainaina,
of 5ectiun....19....., 'fvwnship....~,~........ North, Range_A4.......... E.W.'v1.
'CO IiAV L•: AN U TO tipLD the same, untu the said Spukane County for the purposes ui a puhlic roacl
~ furever. ~
In w' •I~ereof . ..........havn c~reu to sct............. hand.... and stal._.. this.A..~.2......... .
day uf . . . . . 19. ~
~ '
.
(Sea 1)
ll n
u - . ca
1 .
RIGFIT Qf MfAY UEED
IN THE MATTER of the BARCM 8L?AD ~ No...1w
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That
and his wife, of the County of Spokane.
in the State of 1Vashington, in consideration of the benefits and other valuable considerations, and the sum
of Dollars, paid.................... by the County uf Spakane,
the receipt whcreoE is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sald and convcyed, and hy these
presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane Cuunty, the following described parcel of land,
situated in Spokane County, in the State of Washington, to-wit : '
?ho east. 28 ioot of Iot 1, Bloak 4, Yeat Diabam Additioa wocoriiang to }lat u
recordod ia Yoluse 3 ot Plate, Page 77, S*olu,ne CoostY, Yashinstan,
of Section......19....,'Cownship..2.~~.......... North, Ksnge_~........... E.W.4.
TO HAVE ANU TO HOI.D the same, unto the said Spukane County for the purposes of a public roa
(urever.
In •hereof ..................have here~to set.............................. hand.... and seal.... this.~.9
day of 19.. .
~ ~ .
. . , .
' -
f ~ . . .
~ RIGMT OF WAY DEEO
r~-
IN THE MATTER of the.......................SAROW-$9iA.1.-.---................................_............No...l98-0
KNOVV ALI. MEN BY TNESE PRI:SLNTS, That
and his wifc, of the County of Spokane.
in the State of 1Yashin,gton, in consideration of the benefits and other valuable considerations, and the sum
of .......................................................................................................Dollars, paid.................... by the County uf Spokane,
the receipt K•hereuf is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these
presents do grant, bacgain, sell and convey unto said Spokane CuuRty, the tollovving described parcrl of land.
situated in Spokane County, in the State of Washington, to-w•it:
The Mst7 ZNt of HLOC1[ 6 Ot YeAt Di~iII ~UtiOII iCOM~~ ~}~.t Y 1'eOOS'd" ~
voltis• 3 of Plat•, Page 77. apokaae Covuty, Yamhiagtaa, .
of Sectiun...19.. 'fuwn>hip....... ~7 ....North, Range...... E.W..M.
'CO HAVE AND TO HO[,D the same, untu the said Spukane County tor the purposes of a public road
iurevrr. ~
In w' wliereo have her~to set .........................hand.... and sea1.... this
Jay of 197.
~ • .
. . ea l )
.
u I~ _ . u
v ~
' • • . . . ' • ' . • i,
Si'OKANE COUNTY FN(3INF'yRIS DWARTMEPIi'
SF'UK1WE C0IJNTY, WASHINGTON " . ~ • • . - . .
RIGHT OF MAY AGREE:4EZIT r r; m t tr. 1•I ATTE42 OF SA.RG}N!' RO/lD NO . I9W
ring Corp., Z. $5W 3prmkgut Avo., Spokaaov Ya. Grantor of Aight of Yay
Pakune Caunty, Washington. .
:
llocuments for A right of way for Public Works purposes over property describe¢ in said
documents have been de].ivered to W, a, prNcs r Right of Way Agent, ae
escrow agent, with instructiona to deliver said docwaents to the Caunty Engineer.la
vepartnent. On delivery to the Spokane Couaty Engineer's Department, a copy of this
agreement properly executed by the duly anthorized representative will be returned to
the undersigned Grantor. '
In consideration of•the foregoing and other considerations hereinafter Bet Sorth, it is
mutually agreed by the parties hereto as folloWS: 1. Said right of way is granted free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and
paxtial release for said right of way shall be furniahed to tha Spokane County
Engineer•s Department, and the total aroount in cash settlement sha11 be paid
to the Grantor, Except such portion thereof as the Grantor may assign to a
lienholder in obtaining the partial releaoe.
2. All work done under this ugrement shall conform to a11 applicable laus,
ordinaaces, and regulations relating to such r+ork, and shall be done in
a good and worlvnanlike manner. 3. All structures, improveroents, or other facilities when removed and relocated •
or reeonstructed by the Departmez►t, it:; Contracturs, and Assigns 6ha11 be
left in as good a condition us found.
4. No work, improvements, alteration, or maintenance by the Dspartment, its
ContraCtors and Aseiens, will be perforred other thaci that provided for in
this agreement.
j. In ful7., corrtplete, and final p,Zyment and settlement for the title or interest
conveyed or granted, as fully set forth in the aforementioned documents
dated ~y~ t976 , 3pokane County, fts Agents e.nd Assigns
e,gree to the following:
5a. Spoksrse County agrees to initiate vacation procaedings for th• portioa of Beaaie
Raad 2yfa6 b+tveeII the south line of $prage:o Avenu• and Lh• aorth lino of Firat Avsnue.
5b, Spokane Couaty Wote to reloaate fona• oa tbe new right of wau► line of B1oek 6 of
Weat Dietisan Addition, at eueh tim• as the riaht of vay ie inproved.
Sc. Tbf Caaator agrsea to inetall cvrb aad ai4a+r43.lc along tb• vsst right of way line of
SargeAt Road, upon luade conveyod this dato, as deliaeated by th• County Ln
elao Weea to pavf Sargent Road trom the aov curb to the exieting gavNent
5d. Opon vacation of BeBai• Road (itaator triil remove exiating radfi at corn__ _~..v...,
Acad aad Sprague Avenue and lnatall etiundard drivev+yr.
5e. It ia th• desire of ths Grautor tbat Yirst Avenw between Sargent aad Sipple, aa
preaantly established, be vaaated. Io comoption therewith the (~rantor wgrees, witLin
5 yoare of the date of this agrooseut, to Maure tor ultfsate caaYeraaee to Spakaaw
Couaty t strip of land, of eutiiai.ut wi►dtb, to provide • 60 loot roadbed at ao -
tlovatica •qual to ttie existiaa elration of rirst 1lvenw. The Qraator aleo agc*ir to
conaLruct said rosdwyr ia accordaace yith Couaty Staadaucd Speaifications. Uid strip,
of land beiaa soutb of and ad3oiains B1qak 5 and 6. Yest Dishnaa Additioa ssteoding
rreeteriy troo the weet right of vpr 2f.ue of StrgenL Road to e point 383 t"t *ast at
ths csnter sectioa line. Spokane CoWty saaes to iaitiate the vacation upon notifieatiou
by the (irantor that he ie prepared to oouYey eaid strip to the Cownty frse and clear
of all encumbrances.
r~~w,~+.drr~•~-.
. . , . v ti.
. . . .
RIGHT OF MAY AGRF.QMENT
N0. 1980
Total Cash Settlement I'bae '
Uistribution of Compcnsation:
•The t3raatore hereby sgree to allow Spokane County, ite Agents, and Assigns
permi6sion to perform vork outside the right of wey, as aeceesary,to
accoarpli•sh any of the aforementioned items.
6. The partie$ have here set out the rhole of their agreement. The performancs of
tbia agreement coastitutes the eatire consideration for the grant of eaid right
of way aad ahall relieve the Dapartment of further obligations or claimg reeulting
fran plaani.ng and conetructioa of ths prnposed project.
19~0.
IN YITNESS YBEREQF we have hereunto set our handa this ;Z.2 day of
APPaouaty flngineer. *;t s , •
STATE OF VA35fIIHMN ) ~ .
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
Ou this day pereonally appeaured before M Fi'iai Cox'Poration, Joba A. Pring, Prosilbnt
knovn to M41 p e iadividual deaaribed hereia who "
executad e w t ia a►ad oregoing inatrwlAt AA4 aclaiowledge thwt !H signned the
aamo as hie iree and voluntsry act 4pd doad tor the u8es and pwrpoees th"in• osationed.
(33ven under my hand end seal this 22nd day at March 19 8•
Notatt ic
IA and ior the State of Waahiugtoo.
' ~,t ti~ wt S„looligne.i.._batmak
f L~
OFF.ICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
DatP ' i9 _
Inter-office Communitation
Tl+
From
sub;e& . . , . ,
kEl~1 YOU f I:~ l1C~l~f~, 1 Yt~llll.'j tI-1?3L Wi111[• .1cSCK {'ri.nh ~'~~b l' z?llk~ !1.. .
_,,.ci you and I were on the phone, his representa[ives were in thfs offi:.
~~,iewing the whole thinR with my staff. ,1ack Pring joined them after leav- have not refuaed to meet with them, but rather have explained our pians and h,
Pd them t0 come up with 8UggE>c`i,-7,.- nf h;(it.J `F~,v c:,,r, ;in
•.-,e it'f,:as -n wnrl< ,i-p and nre~4(-:
Form 327-CR
. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
DotP March 26 19~5
Inter-office Communication
Tr Mr. Tom M , Sp kane ou ty Zoning Adjustor
From Robert T~F
Subje& VE 225-84
The County Engi neer and hi s staff have met wi th the appli cants and di scussed a
number of alternatives with them. The application, as proposed, we feel will en-
croach too far i nto the road i ntersecti ons' clear vi ew si ght di stance tri angles to
perrtri t safe traffi c operati ons. The County has a long-range plan for a new major
arteri al along the present 2nd Avenue ali gnment (an extensi on of the Old hti lwaukee
Rai 1 road ri ght of way corri dor west to interstate 90), Thi s plan i ncl udes an i mpor-
tant connection between Sprague Avenue and 2nd Avenue on Sargent Road. Direct access
to 2nd Avenue and Sargent Road from i ndi vi dual parcels wi 11 create addi ti onal traffi c
safety problems in the future. Therefore, direct access to Sargent Road or 2nd
Avenue should be prohibited.
From our analysis of both the County's existing and future traffic needs and our
understanding of the applicant's present and future access needs, we propose the
following alternate proposal for your consideration and approval.
Sargent Road: That the variance reyuest for relief of setback requirements alony
Sargent Road be deni ed. The long-range plan for Sargent Road requi res acqui si -
ti on of addi ti onal ri ght-of-way along the frontage i n questi on and a 25 ft.
radius at the corner of Sargent and 2nd Avenue. The granting of a variance and
subsequent i ssuance of a bui ldi ng permi t wi 11 constrai n the future constructi on
of the much needed 2nd Avenue to Sprague Avenue connection on Sargent.
lst Avenue: 22 foot front yard setback from exi sti ng ri ght-of-way li ne as re-
quested by the appli cant.
2nd Avenue: 20 foot front yard setback from existing right-of-way line; no access
to 2nd Avenue; addi ti onal ri ghts-of-way wi 11 be requi red for future road
improvements.
A bui ldi ng sli ghtly smal ler i n si ze could be bui lt by the appli cant and sti 1 1
avoid the "fill problem" reported to be at the southwest corner of the site. Both
exi sti ng and future traffi c could operate wi thout any si gni fi cant traffi c safety
problems. Because of the extra wi de ri yht -of-way and ample vehi cle parki ng area on
lst Avenue, no si gni ti cant operati ng problems should occur i n provi di ng the only
access to the site along lst Avenue.
We beli eve the above proposed alternate provi des suffi ci ent reli ef for both the
applicant's stated problems and yet not restrict the County's present and projected
future improvernents. We, therefore, recommend the above alternates for your con-
si derati on. Our recommendati on for the devi ati ons, as ori gi nal ly requested by the
appli cant, i s that they be deni ed as i ncompati ble wi th current and future road uses.
RST/set
M ~ y . ~ ~ ~ ~ _14 ~ 1 ) ,~J~ ~ .~~r' t ~ 1 ~
, or r• t<:~ c►r•
COUNTY ENGINEER
ROBERT S. TURNER
~.~G . = _~4 / r~ F COttNTY ENGIPtEER
99260
?•i~:r~h i:', Ic{~`i
~I f~.1H:1"I: vr 22-5-K~
Lflt' c3h(1Vt•-L1Cjecj Vcif1t111Ce W7tfl Cf1E' HO'dY(j
.)r Councy .:ummis5iuntr5, aiid the Enginrer's staff has discussed a number of
,oncerns wi ~h che app] icant. This a~lpl icant prPViously requested Che vacation
,)t Cfic' i:Sf i~Itil' ~'2f{~t~-~Jt-W<Itdtj ~.t('c'1tC Ci) tflt (>Ci}peCCy l[[Ilj@I' l'OL15Idt'Cc1CI0il.
It I:,t k-,{rac ioii wati ;i4~j,rovt2d, additional propertv would becomu
..~r<~i lahl~ e, ch,, appl.icant and d ilew Plail could then be developed. Since tliis
"ould resulc in a possible remedy to the applicant's present problem, this
Ij,-partmNr)L wc„iid request, on behalf of the Board of County Commissfoners, ~A
:untiuuanc•e ot the hearing cu an unspecified future date. The BAd could
ik,:t1n cousider, at a public hearing, che Ist Avenue vacation situation and
:I;ake a f i n,il drtermi nat ion on the matter. Approximately 4 to 6 weeks art
nre&,d ioi ritt- B.,;3rd ,t, i)rucess a right-of-way vacation action.
~u11I.1ijdlClo17;!l .,:Iti1C~t'I'7ClOIl.
~r,i~ ~
- E3 . ~ . ~i , . ~ : i. , - • ' '`'f'~'r 1;p(!k,dilc. wdSflltltitUfl 99260 (50q) 45t,
u „m~„~
.4.
P
R ~
} ~
§
9 ~£r'.
s ~ e
,5
~k. 3
e
~
,
n ~w '4
}
m
r m . N _
,
F #
~ ~
-