The URL can be used to link to this page

VE-83-81 & CUE-10-81 - ~ . • ' ' ' . ? ~ . , . . ~ ~ RGCEi sjOlAIIE l'i111N1 t SEPO S ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT vF .r---...1 . . SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF REVfEWING THE ) ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION OF THE ) SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ADJUSTOR ) FINDI14GS & ORDER IN A DECISION TO APPROVE ) VARIANCE #VE-83-81 AND CONDITIONAL ) USE # CUE-10-81 ) THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of Adjustment for Spokane County, is an appeal of an administrative action by the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor approving the Variance Conditional Use #VE-83-81 and CUE-10-81 for the purpose of constructing a seniar citizen retirement home, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal". The Board of Adjustment of Spokane County having held a public hearing on July 6, 1981, and having fully considered all testimony presented thereat, and having rendered a decision on the 6th day of .1uly 1981, approving said proposal, does hereby make the fallowing: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposal is generally located at the southwest corner of McDanald Road and 12th Avenue, Spokane County, LVashington. 2. That the proposal consists of a request lor a conditional use for a 96-unit residence for senior citizens and variance on the number of parking spaces. 3. That the Generalized Comprehensive F'lan for Spokane County indicates Urban Designation for the area encompasseci by this proposal. 4. That the provisions of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State Environ- mental Policy Act) have been complied with and the Board of Adjustment concurs with the Zoning Adjustor's issuance of a declaration of non-significance for this proposal. 5. That the Spokane County Zvning Adjustor held a public hearing on May 27, 1981, concerning the proposal, and that on June 10, 1981, the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor, by Conclusions of Law and Findings of Fact did render a decision to approve the proposal. 1 . , ~ • FINDINGS AND ORDER CUE-10-81 &VE-83-81 - 2 , • . , , , 6. That on June 19, 1981, an appeal from the decision of the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County was filed by Mr. Stephen D. Ferrell, an objector. 7. That the existing land uses in the area of proposal include single family residences, church facilities, elementary Sr_I'100I and undeveloped land. 8. That the proposal is compatible witl) existing uses in the area. 9. That the proposal is not detrimental or° otherwise harmful to the public health, safety and welfare. 10. That the pr-oposal is not totally inconsistent with the surrounding land use classifications and does not grant a special pr•ivilege or rights to the applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property owners. 11. That the proposal is situated within the recorded fire service area of Fire District #1. 12. That the proper legal requirements for• advertising of the hearing before the Spokane County Board of Adjustmerit have been met. From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department Staff Report related to File CUE-10-81, and the staff presentation of the files, the Board of Adjustment of Spokane County hereby approves the proposed conditional use subject to the following conditions: 1. Adopt the Conditions of the Spokane County Zoning Adjustor Conclusions of Law and Findings of Fact of lui)e 10, 1981. 2. Subsequent to the issuance of the occupancy permit, the Zoning Adjustor may hold a public hearing to deter-rYiine the necessity of improving 12th Avenue to mitigate traffic problems associated with this project. Board Vote: 4- 1 Mrs. Thompson voting against approval. ~ LL FINDINGS ANC ORDER CUE-10-81 &VE-83-81 - 3 Furthermore, from the foregoing Findings, a r-eview of the Planning Department Staff Report dated May 27, 1981, and the staff presentation of File VE-83-81, the Board of Adjustment of Spokane Coiinty hereby approves the requested variance from parking requirements of llie Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. Board Vote: 5 - 0 r DATED This day of '~`r~ 1981. SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT I ~ Or-A~TMR~;~~ NE COUNTY, WASHING N ~ ~ cVIM N N ~ ~ ~ , , r or ~ w!: t. gT4JmanD C'CJ~QETE ( ~ g~DEw.e~K M~~. I i~ MtN. !x ~ 114 , ~r ccC +caers . a~c"wur, sow wara 1. cF&W-r cc•JcnF-re causs-r.o suaPaci~-q Tr+v couasr. ~ ~ CtJnD, YYPI 'd' C9H~ °JIJo b48E Gt+u2~'£ I ~JEO !1'C FFG AJJO 9CAl.°.Jk , 1JOT~" 9. . . ~ T ►Y M l7seD wM.., p &r T►1e cou~.iTy L'2UACyWl~Y °lEGT1GN 1JG. 2 ~ c~T c~~~ !►J~ T111CJKJlss "F,w1..L QislOc►JT~~►l. " - bf ra~►~~tC ~.c+o9 a,.ro o~ v.4was. ~ l'`fPIG&L.I_Y QEGUIQCD FCJQ L]QbM41 9tm iECT1GwJ 4.01-A-2. • 'u~ 1 I~ C. C.. u nE f~- f~ ~ ~ ! - i eT' ~ nOanwAY ?GCTIOW ' ~ A.~,.o r..i►~ - r.o. , . 1. I dw No. .asee 1 sv 1 i { eo' 1 sim wim 2 vrr~ ur- CUUNTY ~J611JEE . GcA-LEtTTiQ ~ Lo' I 2' , 00' 9PC*%dJJE CG / 9N1~~~~' ' - ewcc*jo,rrr ~ 44• aa' f YEe a,nvrwvgv. . ►~~.,wn ~ ae' ~ a' ,re9 epcIIw'+e cuu►Jrr eNGlN~ea. ~ . oere. . ti •-t-ati , JA /V ~'D ,~n w+crr ro ecxa 8►4EeT 9- 2 V C H o /P,d s' O C~ o . ~ . , ~ , • o ' A • ~ ~1~' ~.~.~'.~e~ ~~ii~'~ : 4t OFN'IaE OF ~ ~ i ' COUNTY ENGINEER J~A,_~~i ~ ROBERT S. TURNER COUNTY ENGINEER Srepmmvm Wi~auvcrroar 99260 T0: Spokane County Zoning Adjustor FROM: Bob McCann, Plat Inspector SUBJECT: Applications Under Consideration May 27, 1981 The County Engineer submits the following conditions for your consideration: CUE 10-81 ~ No Conditions. However if adequate provisions are not made for on-site parking the resultant vehicle overflow will park on adjacent public streets. A congested situation could develop; in which case it may become necessary to prohibit on-street parking. Also see memo of April 3, 1981. VS-67-81 The County Engineer has no conditions relative to this appli- cation. You should be advised that the proposal is located with a Flood Hazard Area. CUS-13-81 That sidewalks are required along Shasta Drive and a drainage plan submitted for review and appraval by the County Engineer. These requirements must be in conformance with the provisions of the Board of County Commissioners Resolution 80-1592 as ammended. YW-64-81 The County Engineer has no conditions concerning this applica- tion. VE-50-81 Neither Hill Road or Dalke Avenue are established and maintained county roads. Applicants property does not front on Dalke Avenue which is the proposed access route. Therefore it is questionable that reasonable assurance can be provided that Dalke will ever be established or maintained. Access via Hill Road poses a similar situation. It is the County Engineer's recommendation that this application be denied unless the applicant can provide reasonable assurance that Dalke Avenue could be established and maintained at some time in the future. This would include: Persons owning property on Dalke Avenue through which the access easement passes (Tract 5 of McDowell's Tract must acknowledge & agree to the following: 1. There may be a future need for a public road to serve the described property. 2. Agree to deliver to Spokane County the right-of-way for a future road. Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456-3600 T , BEFORE THE ZOfiiNG ADJUSTOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY,-WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF: CONTINUATION APPLICANT: Spokane Baptist Association Homes, Inc. REQUEST: Senior Citizen Retire►nent Home COUNTY CODE: 4.04.130 (a) and 4.24.040 FILE NUMBER: CUE-10-81 HEARING DATE: MAY 13, 1981 This matter being the consideration by the Zoning Adjustor for Spokane County and pursuant to Chapter 4.25, Section 4.25.010, the Zoning Adjustor has the authority to hear and decide such matters coming before him, and after hearing a recommendation by the Planning Department staff to have this matter continued, the Zoning Adjustor hereby makes the following: BASIS FOR CONTINUATION 1. The applicant requested continuation to allow time to redesign the pro- ject in an effort to mitigate some of the area residents concerns. II. It was reported that the applicant did meet with area residents to dis- cuss the project resulting in a change in design. III. That an application for a variance in parking requirements will be request- ed by the applicant. The Zoning Adjustor concludes that both the conditional use application and variance application be processed as the same. Since both applications require the same procedures, it would be an unreasonable imposition placed on all parties of concern if the two applications were processed separately. IV. The Zoning Adjustor finds that it would be advisable to have the entire project complete and ready for hearing to be presented as one application. This will allow for a better understandinq of the issues involved. V. The applicant stated that he contacted the attorney representing the opposi- tion to inform him of the request for continuation. The Zonilg Adjustor conclud- ed that several persons of record were not present at the hearing and therefore must have assumed the hearing was going to be continued. VI. The Planning Department recomnended that May 27, 1981 a': 9:00 a.m. be the date to consider this matter. The Zoning Adjustor accepted this date and di ted staff t renotify all parties of record of the new hearing date. /1, j l.~ THOMA5 t. )AVIS 4TT BY: ZONING ADJUSTOR FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON -0 T E ZON NG ADJ 70R DATED MAY 13th, 1981 NOTICE OF Pl111IC HEARINr, Before the Zoninq Adjustor County of Spokane IN THE MATTER OF: HEARING DATE Applicant: Spokane Baptist Associatio~ WEpNESDAY, MAY 27, 1981 9:00 a.m. Homes, Inc. ) N. 7007 Wiscomb ) N. 721 Jefferson, Broadvray Centre aldq. pokane, WA 99208 ) Hearinq Rooni, 2nd floor ) File Number: CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 ) ) Request: Senior Citizen Retirement ) Any interested person may appear before Home and Relaxation of Parking ) the Zoning Adjustor Requirement ) }NOTE: This item was continued from May 13, 1981 Hearing in ordEr that apDlication for Zone Classification: A9Suburbanal )a variance may be hEard in conjunction with County Code: 4.04.130 (a), 4.24.040 &)the conditional use permit. 4.17.061 (a) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is pronosing a two story senior citizen residents facility containing 96 sinqle and two bedroom residential units on a parcel of land approximately 5.5 acres in size. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance in this instance, provides that such a use may be considered in accordance with conditional standards as provided by the Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance. Also, apolicant is requestinq a variance for relaxation of parking requirements. Applicant is proposinq 60 parkinq spaces whereas the requirement for this project is 144 parkinq spaces. ENVIRON~IEI~TAL IMPACT: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Zoninq Ad.7ustor has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental im- pacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530.(2) provides that: ..."In the event that the further investiqations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonaly sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental imqacts of the nroposal, an EIS 5ha11 be preoa red." Please contact: Sookane County Planning Depa►-tnient Telephone No: 456-2205 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION t Section 22 Township 25 Range 44 EIJM f,TH ll . W~ ~ F Parcel 22543-9113 and 22543-9101 E ~11 o ' • Si te Si ze: Approx4mately 5.5 acres T H A v E • 22P a r c e l 2 2 5 4 3- 9 1 1 3: E 78 R o f p t n o f S E 1/4 of SW 1/4 lyq S of 12th Avenue exc SE ~r 1 /4 of SE 1 /4 of 3W 1 /4 & exc E 325 ft. of a . t NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 )f SW 1/4 and exc platted - p tn . 22543-9101 (ptn of) The N 160 ft. of the E 325 f t. o f N E 1/ 4 o f S E 1/ 4 o f S W 1/ 4 l y g S o f 1 2t h Avenue o lus t hat ptn of vacate d M o r r o w S t. a d j o i n i n g p r o p e r t i e s a b o v e ~ •c , ~ = • t descri bed. rH t r 1 ~ ~ , ("1L~ , 5 r F 1"=1000 ,.r---- ~ 1 •t ti.. ~ ~ J ~ ~ V X ~ ~ i:J i lPT a f~ JI \~t C] ~ I '.~h` ~ < . J I ~ ~ \ ~I ~ f~ L. ! ♦ f OFFICE Of TNE SPOKANE C4UNTY PLANINING DEPARTMENT Date M1, 2k ,19$i- To Engineerinq*o, Suilding and Safety, Utilities, Health and 208 Staff From__ZUCti CIg - Subject _ Zonina Adiustor Hearina May 27, 1981 9:00 a.m. Attached is a request for a conditional use permit located in an area that your agency may want to review and comment on. Please have all comments returned to this office by may 22, 1981 Thank you, Garry R. Thompson Assistant Zoning Administrator ~V Attach nts GRT:grt • ' RE`l'IREMENT HOMES AS e1iV ALTERNATIVE TO LN-JRSlNG HGi`1t.b • , , Johrt Haugaa, Adminiscrator Lilac Plaza Retirement Home Anna died a few weel:s ago. She was 87 and had becn tota2ly blind. Anna was able to care for herself except for preparing her major meal. Because Liiac Plaza had a meal program, Anna was able to live at the Plaza instead of in a nursing home. Another Plaza program which was necessary to keep Anna out of a nursing ho.1c ,s the visiting nurse program. The nurse gave Ann3 neeuec shots twice a month; .:-.;d.:r ;1er docto:'s orders. Anna's legs, very vulnerable for a 'iiir.d person, were chec:cea wCaiciy and treated iohen necessary. The doctor was kept informet." by LiE aurse. Th:.s service, alone, saved hundreda of dollars, which would have been paid by :iedicare or ::edicaid. Anna was one of the lowest income residents. :ieeping Anna out of a nursing home saved at least $500 a month in the difference in subsidieg at the Plaza ver3us a r.ursing home. This was a savings of about $6.000 a year, or aimost $36,000 for the six yeara Anna ltved at the Plaza. There are at least 40 other residents at the Plaza who can talce care of themselves, but need the meal and the nursing care available. Aside from the money saved, the zuct that Anna could participate iil Li1e xany accivicies, get her groceries in the co-op grocery and have ner hair shampooed, al:: at tile Plazn, hopefully added to Anna's "quality of life" and helped to make 'her last ycars more meaningful. This is a poignant and true fact which has proven tnat our oid,~r citize:11s who arc d~one or choose to live alone can have a full and meaningful life with friends around them. There were other prograws which were a help to keep Anna out or ci nursing home. These suggestione could serve as a guide for what could be dor.e in retirement homes tnroughouc the country. The goal at Lilac Plaza is "to meet eveYy need ot every resident". The following prol;rar;,s., activities and facilities are available to meet every need. 1. A meaZ program. The meal is served at the table, not served careteria style. There is provision for special diets and tray service is available. 2. A nursing service, with emphasis on prevention and early detection. This program should be e muet in every retirement home. Zledicare is bacicwards! Care is available only after the fact. A r pieher} ~ve heel:h araRr~ ahould emphasize prevention and early detec[ion. The 385 Army leserve unit ran phyaical assessments for our residents, including chest x-rays, electrocardiograms, blood and urine checks, tests for eye, ear and breathing functions. The nurse monitors blood pressures twice weekly, gives shots under doctor's orders, p,ives foot care and checlcs up on medications. She visits the sick in their apartments and reports to the doctor. 3. The Administrator is a notary public. This is a free service. 4. A copy machine is available, at cost. 5. There is a small change drawer for making change for busses, iaundryY etc. 6. Volunteers in the oFfice make out me;-tl tickets for residents' guests, take care of [heir dry cleaning and prescriptions delivered from the pharmacy and he2p residents witti any prablems they may have. 7. Coffee, tea and bouillon are availabic ~rce frum 9:00 a.m. to noon in the lounge to provide a social time for Lne residents. R. P.esidents may havc, rheir own ;;.+rdens. . . itus service to ttie deor. .•,.~o'kmobile serves our re~.ir~nt: . L±hrary av:iila}alv in bui_ldi_nly,. !;clin-operate(' '.aundry. Co-pp gtocery s~ore run bY resis-1e^• -)ruFram dai.Ly with differont p'ar1*_s~s arc' sor,~*. ?e<iders. IM.p pri•cinct in the builc!in^. Voter regis._i'ation cards are Led uut for resi- C'- c:is to trar.s'7er the'_r renistra.i~n. Cand4dares are invited to spea'e: Co the residents : i:( ' Ls:.ues :►re C' 7_•iCuSSed , 16. Democracy in actI.an - A P.esictents' Counc-:'_ mee•_s weekly u-=th t?~c Aclmi.nistrator. They .•r en cormitte,2s to ':and_'.e problcms whic*z ar-se; ;:lan PtOllthlV par'.:'_eS and set up twice- rll'1}' n3riC3,CC' brCa~rf;,FrS 71T1C1 bar_aar;. `_"'1@ ''af,^CE C~.~'~Il +-p r;(kyr}f)0 yearly fOX r~,i:dznS~ improvc-•nencF:, suc?i as sc,tt:.na ui anc'.t'r-~>s `!iror!-~hout tiie buildini',, _J .!~:.Rt S lfll?RE: ~ '.JC~.'.~~C ~~}~O7y .~:JC•t.1_ I LC~~ FI C._,~ - - i h, ~rUi,i' Cl1C.tR};. 1. T"loor monitors check on res :dents cai? v. . Vec o,, r 5,:,-~,~r - }'.c'. S~nd,~.• ~i titu,'.ics ; ' -)aO_n~ ing, c:ercnsiv r _ ~..I r ~ '?xercise c.'_asses nnc' eQui?ment are availabl,. Ser... „ . , . , _ ' _ . , u~- t, et( . LTti: ticorm windows foY the ent:re which saves $1,500 monthly in col(i weather and sav.. :`)0,000 k.41, a year from ~he noc.Ter oill. Similar savings coulcLi be affected in other hor~~ r..iroug:iout the country. 'rhe Rotary Cluh bui'_t an outdoor gazebo. The Kiwanis Club pru- v'ces rruit and flover.s a* Christmas and F,nster for residents with no far.iilies. The Lio: 17'_ub prevzred Rlauco:na scYeening, transpor_ation for the Army Reserve screening prosram pa'-c. ic,- t'« ie:` i- ~rrns, etc. Ti1e County Extension Service lte'pee with r_lasses on ~c?eninQ. ?S, 4;zi*wor.tn Co' an<. Spokane ?'alls Commur:ity College have been utiliztd for clas5us .;-Id !)y nrovidinF 5,t, =°nt~' en wcrti sl:udy or c' zss projer_ts. The students help set up pro- -•,m~; and pCOjectt is the d.esire o` t`lr P,oarcl anc! ttie staff Co ful.fill that portion of the Lord's Prayery )v 1Cin,:,Zom come, '?"iy will be done on earth (Lilac Plaza) as it is in Heaven''. In a WQ :3re -ryinL to crea*_~~ `,i_t of 1le:ivo« at [he Plaza and at the srame time be an ' ;•?-ft::`'.Vi' t.li . 'Z;I-S'.,*T{? }7QR'tC'. ~ . . . ~ TESTIMONY PRESENTED AT HEARING ON MAY 27, 1981 - I am John Haugan. I live at 9711 N. Cedar Road, Spokane, WA. I have been the administrator for 9~ years of Lilac Plaza Retirement Home, which is sponsored by the Spokane Baptist Association. I have had considerable experience in the field of aging, having served for almost two years as a senior citizens' center director in Missoula, Montana. I have been the coordinator for the White House Conference on Aging for Montana. In addition, I have sezved as the preaident of the Spokane Council on Aging and have served on the Area Agency on Aging Board. I have also represented the elderly on the Esetern Washington Health Systems Agency. I served as the pastor of the Spokane Valley Baptist Church, which is located to the east of the property under discussion. The Spokane Valley Baptist Church has desired to serve the community in many ways. It has opened its doors for a meeting place for the Girl Scouts, Boy Scouta, Jobs Daughters and the local and area clubs of Overeaters' Anonymous. The Day Care Association, community exercise classes and a voting precinct is housed in the church. It is also the meeting place for the Noah's Ark Day Care Center. The church has provided fin- ancial assistance for children of refugee families and others so that the children could attend the center. Single parent families bring their children to the day care center, enabling the parent to work, instead of being on welfare. If the parent could not work and had to be on welfare, the cost would be $325.00 per month. The church has heen collecting money and food for the food bank. Last fall, members of the church went to Lind, Washington to pick up potatoes and brought back three pick-up loads for the food bank. The men of the church have aponsored basketball teams in the Church Basketball League. The League provides a poaitive, wholeaome outlet for youth who do not make the school teams. Youth who get into trouble when there are no positive alternativea cost taxpayers many thousands of dollars. The coat for the care of one boy is $22,000 to $40,000 a year. The church has been concerned about the elderly in the community. A group of inen have helped widowa or elderly couplea with chorea to keep them in their homes as long as posaible. As a Christian church, we are to, as .Tesus said, "Feed the hungry, clothe the naked, take in the stranger and care for the sick". Some of our elderly are finding it increasingly difficult to stay in their own homes because of age, failing eyesight or infirmities of various kinds. These people are not ready for a nursing home at $1,000 a month. They can take care of themselves if a meal is provided and a nurse can look in on them occasionally. We have been doing this at Lilac Plaza for 9-41 years and know it works. At least 40 people at the Plaza would be in nursing homes if they did not have an alternative to the nursing home, such as the Plaza offers. The savings to the individual, the family or the tax payer is about $700 a month, which represents a savings for the people in our build- ing of $28,000 a month, or $336,000 a year. Many people who have to go to a nursing home use up all their assets in a very short time and then become wards of the state. The bill for taking care of elderly in nursing homes is now $280,000,000 a biennium and rising. When one realizes the enormous problem to society the nursing home bill is becoming, it is imperative that we provide alternatives to those who do not need the full service of a nursing home. , • . • • , A few years ago, in planning to meet the needs of the people, the church members made a survey of a two-mile area around the church. We asked the people who an-- swered our questions about how we could best meet the needs for young people, for families and for the elderly. We had in mind a multi-purpose room and housing for the elderly. My wife and I surveyed the homes from 13th to 15th Avenue, east of the church. Other families took other areas. Questions were asked and the answers are on record at the Valley Baptist Church. When my wife and I made the survey, some of the falk thought we were missionaries of another group and refused to talk to us. So, perhaps the questionnaire and method of securing the survey was not the best, but considering that it wae amatuers doing it, we did our best. Clarence Hart and I also visited the various agencies in the city and county concerning our proposal to get reactions from the various government agencies. It was on the basie of this favorable information that we obtained an option on the land to build a retirement home for the elderly. This home would enable many of our people to stay in their own neighborhood. The fellowship hall is being built to supply a social meeting place for not only the residents of the retirement hoem, but also the retirees in the immediate area. While serving as the planning coordinator for the state of Montana, I read a survey conducted by Carroll College in Helena of why the elderly left their communities to move to placea like Sun City, Leisure World, etc, The state was concerned about the elderly leaving the state, because when they moved, they took their in- comes and their seaets and the state was poorer for it. The survey ahowed that the elderly left when there were no activities or programs for the elderly. A home in the Valley would provide needed activities. In addition, retirees are happier living in their own communities with their friende. It is our desire that the retirement home be a real asset to the community. Using the Plaza as an example, we can anticipate besutiful grounda and gardena. A traffic survey in Seattle showed that aingle family resident areas average 10 trip-ends a day. Going to the store and back would be two trip-ends. A 15-day survey taken at the Criata Home in Seattle ahowed that they averaged .1258 trip-ends per resident per day. The Crista Home used a van to take ten or more people at a time to the grocery store. The Valley Baptist Church, as part of its long range miniatry, ie planning to use its church van for transportation for the residents in the home. The residents in the Plaza have used their abilities to contribute to the community with such things as making lap robes for nursing hamea, making quilts for burned out families, providing materials for such things as the Union Gospel Mission and Ogden Hall. It is the Board's desire that the retirement home will fulfill a very great need in the community and that it will be a blessing, not only to the residents who reside in it, but for the whole community. ` • , , . . , BEFOkE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF: APPLICANT: SPOK/INE BAPTIST HOMES ASSOC., INC. ) DECISION REQUEST: SENIOR CITIZEN FACILITY AND RELAXATION) FINDINGS OF FACT OF PARKING REQUIREP•1ENT ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW COUNTY CODE: 4.04.130 (a), 4.24.040 & 4.17.061 (a)) FILE NUh1BER: CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 PARCEL r: 22543-9113 and 22543-9101 ~ ~DATE OF HEARING: MAY 27, 1981 DATE OF DECISION: JUNE 10, 1981 REPRESENTED BY: JOHN B. MOLANDER, ARCHIT CT & JOHN F. HAUGAN DECISION The application is conditionally approved. INTRODUCTIOfd This matter beinq the consideration by the Zoninq Adjustor for Spokane County and pursuant to Chapter 4.25, Section 4.25.010, the Zoninq Adjustol° has the authority to hear and decide sueh matters cominq before him. After con- ducting a public hearinq to receive all public testiniony and after reviewinq the public record, examininq available information and visitinq the pronerty and surrounding area, the Zoning Adjustor in accordance with Chapter 36.70.810 Revised Code of Washinoton and Section 4.25.030 of the county zoninq ordinance hereby makes the followinq Findinqs of Fact and Conclusion of Law hereinbelow stated. The applicant, Spokane Qaptist Homes Association, Incorporated~filed an application with the Planninq Department on May 12, 1981 requestinq a condition- al use permit and variance approval for a senior citizen retirenient home. The subject propertv is located at the Southwest corner or McDonald Road and 12th Avenue in Section 22, Township 25, Range 44. This matte►° was hear-d in its entirety on May 27, 1981 after beinq continued from the May 13, 1981 hearing date (see Continuation Order dated Ma.y 13, 1981). After conclusion of testimony the Zoninq Adjustor set June 10, 1981 at 1:15 p.m. as the time to announce his decision. The Planninq Department recommended that the application be conditionally apDroved. Mr. Garry Thomspon of the Sookane County Planning Deqartment summari- zed the Planninq Deoartment Staff Report. Afte r due consideration of the evidence presented by the applicant, all evidence elicited durina the public hearing, and as a result of the pei°sonal in- spection of the sub,ject property and surroundinq area by the Zoninq Adiustor, the followinq Findinqs of Fact and Conclusions of Law shall constitute the de- cision of the Loninq Adjustor on this aoplication. EXHIBITS IDENTIFIED EXNIQIT "A": Staff Reoort, Spokane County Planning Department EX!-IIBIT "B": Plot Plan EXHIQIT "C": guildinq Elevation Plan STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT THRESHOLD DETERMINATION Non-Siqnificance The anproval of this apDlication will constitute a"major action" under the provisions of Chapter 43.21 C Revised Code of Washinqton and WAC-197-10. The applicant submitted an environmental checklist with the application. After re- viewinq the environmental checklist, the Planning Department made a proposed threshold determination that approval of this application will not have a siqni- ficant adverse impact uoon the quality of the environment and that an environ- mental impact statement is not required. The Planninq Department transmitted a PAGE 2 ' CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 proposed declaration of non-sianificarice to other aqencies with jurisdiction on April 7, 1981. At the public hearing on h1ay 27, 1981 the opportunity was afforded to re- ceive cornnents from the public regarding potential impacts upon the environment. That having visited the subject property, having evaluated the natural, ph,ysical and social systems, and having considered public testimony related to this application the Zoninq Ad,justor concurrs with the Planninq Department's finding that this proposal will not have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the environmemt. THEREBY A FINAL DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE HAS QEEN ISSUED QY THE ZONINr, ADJUSTOR ON JUNE 10, 1981. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The apqlicant is proposinq a two story senior citizen resident facility containinq 96 single and two bedroom units on a parcel of land 5.5 acres in size. Also, the applicant is proposinq 60 parking spaces whereas the require- ment for this project is 144 parking spaces. II. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance in this instance provides that such use may be considered in accordance with conditional standards as prescribed in Section 4.24.010 and 4.24.040. Conditional Standards are as follows: l. Minimum Lot Area: 3 acres The applicant's property contains 5.5 acres. 2. Minimum lJidth at Buildin9 Line: 125 feet There is 290 feet of width at the buildina line. 3. Minimum continuous frontage along a public str•eet: 100 feet There is 590 feet of frontape alonq 12th Avenue. 4. Minimum Lot Depth: 125 feet The sub,ject property has 670 feet of depth. 5. Maximum Lot Coveraqe: 35% The proposal covers 21.2°0. 6. Minimum Setback distance: Front yard (12th Ave.) - 35 feet Applicant is providing 50 feet setback. Rear vard - 25 feet Project has 120 feet setback. Side yard - 25 feet Prollect has 30 feet setback. 7. One unliqhted sign not to exceed six square feet in area. The applicant shall comply with this requirement. Further examination of the zoning ordinance indicated that there are no other requirements for retirement homes. However, under Section 4.24.010, the Zoninq Adjustor has the responsibility to determine that such use will not be detriitiental to the qeneral comprehensive plan and surrounding properties, and that the Zoninq Ad,justor has the right to stipulate restriction and conditions to uphold the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance and to mitiqate an.y adverse effect unon neighborhood properties. Findinqs and Conditions herein- . , . ' PAGE 3 ' ' . . . CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 after stated are considered reasonable in assuring compatibility. III. The maxiinum height proposed at the building core is 28 feet 6 inches high. The residential building wings are 24 feet hiqh and are considered to be two- stories. The Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance, Section 4.03.020 (49) defines "Story" as "....A sinqle story shall not exceed sixteen feet in heiqht from the top of the foundation to the roof ridge line...." IV. The Zoning Adjustor finds that the Planning Department report (Exhibit "A") accuratel.y sets forth the issues, qeneral findings of fact, apnlicable policies and provisions includinq departmental recommendations in this matter. This re- port is incorporated by reference as part of these Findings of Fact contained herein. v. The staff report (Exhibit "A") contained public aqencies recommended con- ditions of approval. Those agencies responding are County Planninq Departnient, County Enginee ring Department, Count.y Utilities Department, County Health Dist- rict Departnent, Sookane County Valley Fire District, State Departinent of Social and Health Services and the State Departnent of Ecology. After reviewing these recommendations, the Zoning Adjustor finds that these conditions with the ex- ception of recommendation by the Valley Fire Department reqarding sprinkler system noted in the staff report f, 3 page 5 are merited in this instance and thereby are beinq imposed hereinafter as conditions of approval. VI. . In reference to the Valley Fire District recoi7miendation reqardinq sprinkler system, the applicant testified that a sprinkler system was not beinq installed. However, other buildinq safety features were beinq incoraorated into the desiqn to assure safety of the residents. The Zoninq Adjustor finds that compliance ajith the Uniform BuildinQ Code and Uniform Fire Codes are absolute. That it is the duty and responsibility of permit issuinq agencies to seek compliance with all codes. If sprinkler systenis are required by code, then compliance by the applicant will be necessary. Should alternative safety desiqn features acceptable to the permit issuinq agencies be incorpated in lieu of a sprinkler s.ystein, the condition requiring such system will be dismissed. VII. The property was zoned Agricultural-Suburban in 1955. Chapter 4.05 of the zoning ordinance identifies both residential and non-residential uses as permitt- ed uses. Non-residential uses which are permitted outriqht include churches, libraries, non-profit community halls and lodqes, schools, hospitals and sani- tarium (reference 4.05.060 and 4.05.065). Animal keepinq is permitted within the Agricultural-Suburban zone in accordance with the provisions specified in Section 4.05.080. Section 4.05.130 identifies those uses which may be permitt- ed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 4.24 (Conditional Uses). In addition to retirement homes and nursing homes, community swimminq pools, narks, playgrounds, public utility facilities, public office buildinqs and qroup homes ai°e listed as conditional uses. VIII. The Zoninq Adjustor received testimony from the applicant's representative describinq the proposal in detail includinq the type and need for such care facilities. The objective of the applicant's proposal is to provide retire- ment homes as an alternative to the more costly nursing hones. The facility will be desiqned to provide separate apartn-ent type livinq quarters while makinq available to the residents the followinq: One meal ner day will be served; provide nursinq service (with emphasis on prevention and early detect- ion); recreational activities including gardenina; and many other programs de- siqned to qive its residents a sense of fulfillment. • ~ ' PAr,E 4 . • CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 Ik. The 1981 Comprehensive Plan has desiqnated this area as Ur-ban. The pur- pose of the Urban Cateqory is to provide the opportunity for development ofa "city-like" environment which includes various land uses, intensive residential development and public facilities and services. The residential net densities should have an approximate density of 1 unit per acre to 17 units per acre. Multi-family structures will usually be a transitional use located between single famiiy residential and the iro re intensive areas. (See Section 1.00 Spokane County Comprehensive Plan). The proposal has a net density of 18 units per acre. However, because of the special characteristics associated with a retirement home, compliance with the Comprehensive Plan can be supoorted. Supportinq decision guidelines are Section 1.1.2 - bonus densities, Section l.l.b - direct or near direct access to a major arterial, Section l.l.c - desiqn consideration to insure protection of sinqle family area, Section 1.4.a - buffer- ing from adjacent land uses, and Section 1.6.1.a - conforiiiance to plans, policies and regulations. X. From on-site review, the following conditions are found: 1) The adjacent properties located to the West of the pro,ject site contain sinqle family residences. 2) A church and a multi purpose facility (under construction) is located to the East. 3) Area to the South contains school grounds with a sc{iool located at the Northwest corner of McDonald Road and 16th Avenue. 4) Area to the North across 12th Avenue contains single fan-jily residences and undeveloped lots. 5) The residences to the West of the project site are facinq Woodlawn Street and are oriented toward the fron t yard setback line of the lot. It is estimated that the distance between these homes and the proposed structure would be at least 100 feet. 6) With the required improvements for 12th Avenue, ingress and egre5s via 12th Avenue and McDonald Road, in the opinion of the Zoning Ad,justor would be adequate to accommodate the existing and anticipated traffic. XI. The applicant in his presentation cited Lilac Plaza Retirement Honie as an example of a retirement home in a residential area. Lilac Plaza is located at N. 7007 Wiscomb Street in North Spokane. The Zoning Adjustor reviewed the area and noted the following: 1) Lilac Plaza is a 13 storied retirement building. 2} The site is well landscaped and maintained. 3) Adjacent land uses consist of single family, duplexes, and multiple family dwelling units. These residential units are modern and well maintainetl. 4) This neiqhborhood gives the appearance of a stable residential neiqh- borhood. 5) Access to Lilac Plaza is by residential collector streets. XII. The applicant is also requesting relaxation of parkinq requirements. Section 4.17.060 (a) requires a total of 144 parking spaces based on 1 1/2 spaces per unit for multiple family residential development. The zoning ordin- ance does not specify parking requirements for retirement homes. However, Sec- tion 4.17.060 (,j) requires that nursing homes, etc., have one (1) space for each 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Because of the nature of the pro- posal, the applicant is requesting a variance to allow for 60 parking spaces. The apolicant indicated that such facilities need approxi►nately 1 space for each two or three apartment units. The aoplicant's proposal has 1 space for each 1.6 units. PAGE 5 • . ' , CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 XIII. From review of the plot plan (Exhibit "B") it is noted however, that 70 parking spaces are shown. The Zoning Adjustor finds that the application and leqal notices requested variance relief for 60 spaces. With a ratio of 1 space for each 1.6 units, the Zoning Adjustor finds that this request is reason- able for retirement homes providing a degree of individual care to its residents. In addition, additional parking is available on the adjacent property occupied by Spokane Valley Baptist Church. XIV. The Zoning Adjustor received public testimony from citizens in support of the applicant's proposal. Testimony of support was received from Clarence Hart, Reverend Frank Brougher, William Sparkes, E. Bogue and Bob McLean. In addition several other persons were in attendance in support of the proposal and are so recorded in the public record. The testimony attested to the need for providinq low cost housinq and care to the elderly while providing a residential environ- ment. Further, testimony was given by a resident who resides near Lilac Plaza describing compatibility with the adjacent properties and notinq the quality of landscaping. Other conunents supported compatibility of the proposal with neighboring residents. XV . Testimony was received in opposition to the proposal. In addition, a petition and a letter of opposition was read into the record. Those testifyinq in opposition are Jim Hose, Steven Nelson, J. 0'Reilly, R.D. Sheppard and Everett Wenke. Concerns cited are: (1) incompatibility with neiqhborhood; (2) potential traffic conqestion; (3) parkina; (4) supervision of elderly; (5) noise; (6) sewage; (7) density; (8) landscaping; and (9) property devaluation. In response to these concerns, the Zoning Adjustor issues the following: (1) IncompatibilitY - It is the Zoning Adjustor's opinion that the pro- posal as submitted does afford campatibility for the followinq reasons: 1) the heiqht being limited to two stories and not exceeding 24 feet for the buildinq wings; (2) the nature of proposal (type of residential living offered); (3) greater setback distances than minimum required; (4) landscapinq (to be a condition of approval); (5) traffic orienta- tion; and, (6) as well as providinq a transitional use between the single family residence5 and the existing church complex. (2) Traffic Conqestion - From on-site review, the Zoninq Adjustor finds that the proposed access to 12th Avenue and connecting to McDonald Road does not pose a threat to the public safety. The applicant testified that average dail.y trips for this kind of facility would be approximately .12 "trip-ends" per resident per day. With the required road improvements including sidewalks and curbs as recommended by the Engineer's Office, adequate assurances have been provided to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. (3) Parkinq - The Zoninq Adjustor is satisfied that adequate oarking with supplemental parkinq available on the church property is being provid- ed. DUe to the design of the interior circulation, on-street parking effecting 6Joodlawn Street and 12th Avenue should not be a problem. (4) Supervision of the Elderly - The applicant described the leval of super- vision beinq provided on a 24 hour basis. Fl concern that residents may wander throughout the neighborhood should not be a problem. (5) Noise - Concern regarding potential noise are mitigated in the follow- ing rnanner: (1) that site developnent will eliminate noise qenerated from use of vacant property; (2) that traffic qenerated is directed away from residential neighborhoods; and (3) that the nature of the use as a retirement complex will create less noise and nuisance than those associated with single family uses if the property were to be developed residentially. (6) Sewaqe - The Zoning Adjustor finds that the permit issuinq agencies for sewage disposal submitted no adverse comments reqardinq this pro- posal. That in review of those coimnents, these agencies have the authority and responsibility to regulate sewage disposal in a manner , . PncE 6 . . ' CUE-10-31 and UE-83-81 that the public health is being protected. The applicant will be required to submit specific plan details for approval prior to the issuance of any buildin4 permits. (7) DensitY - As noted in Findinq IX, compliance with density standards specified by the Comprehensive Plan have been met. The nature of the proposal is such that the units will be occupied by one or two individ- uals at the most. (8) Landscapin - The degree of landscapinq being proposed by the applicant and the en~orcement authority of this action,sufficient landscapinq and screening can be assured. As a condition of approval, a landscapinq plan and required bonding will be imposed. The Planninq Deoartment will be charged with the responsibility for plan review and implementa- tion that is in keepinq with the intent of this action to afford a buffer between the retirement hon-e and adjacent properties. The Zoning Adjustor will direct the Planning Department personnel to require suffi- cient landscaping including berming to effectively screen the adjacent properties. (9) Pr9perty Devaluation - The Zoning Adjustor recognizes that it is difficuft to determine marketability of a qiven piece of property. What may be positive points to one individual may be different to that of another individual. It is the Zoning Adjustor's opinion that with conditions being imposed with this action, adjacent properties will not be injured. As noted in Finding VII regardinq permittecl uses within the Aaricultural Suburban Zone, the Zoning Adjustor further finds that the v)roposal should not depreciate the value of neighboring properties. A conditional use permit, in the opinion of the Zoning Adjustor cannot be denied unless the effect of the proposal is qreater than that of uses permitted in the same zone without a conditional use permit. Under the Aqricultural- Suburban zone classification such uses as churches, schools, community halls and lodqes,and animal keeping are permitted uses having a probable greater im- pact on surrounding properties than the applicant's proposal (refer to Sections 4.05.030, 4.05.060 and 4.05.080). XU I . Any Finding of Fact stated hereinabove which is deemed a Conclusion of Law stated hereinafter is hereby adopted as the same. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. That the Zoning Adjustor for Saokane County has jurisdiction over the issuance of a building permit for the project to the applicant pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 36.70.010 RCW and Section 4.25.030 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. II. The applicant submitted an application to the Planning Department request- ing a public hearing before the Zoning Adjustor, and that pursuant to Chapter 36.70.840 and Section 4.24.040 of the zoninq ordinance, notice of a public hear- ing was given through the United States mail to all property owners within a radius of 300 feet from the subject prooerty. III. That all citizens notified and agencies having ,iurisdiction were afforded the opportunity to testify or submit written comments on the proposed project. IV. As reported in Findinq No. II, the proposa]! more than meets the minimum standards required by the zoning ordinance and thereby, affordinq a qreater degree of protection to neighborinq properties. ~ PAr,E 7 ' _ . CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 V. The Zoning Adjustor has concluded from Finding III that the heiqht of the structure is concert with the greater setback proposed will not obstruct or alter the skyline. That such height is compatible with other residences found in the immediate neighborhood which are single story, split entry design, and two-storied. That further, light, air, and solar access riqhts are not being prohibited with this action. VI. As noted in Finding VIII, the Zoning Adjustor finds merit in the applicant's attempt to provide alternative housing for the elderly that is reasoanble in cast as well as providing needed care and programs. The Zoninq Adjustor views this proposal as a community service to meet the special rieeds of the elderly. VII. It is further concluded that the applicant did make r-easonable efforts to hold community meetings to explain their proposal. The grantina of a continuation to allow such meetings was granted by the Zoning Adjustor on May 13, 1981. The anplicant testified that as a result of these meetings, the proposal was modified in order to mitigate some of the concerns exnressed by area residents. The Zoninn Adjustor is satisfied that the pror)osal as presented in Exhibits a and C adequately mitigates soine of the concerns. VIII. It is the Zoning Adjustor's conclusion that a conditional use permit for which the applicant is requesting is in keeping with the character of the neigh- borhood and of the Agricultural Suburban zone. The nature of the conditional use permit process and the authority conferred allows for flexibility and the imposition of special guidelines considered essential and desirable to mitigate any adverse effect upon the neiqhborhood properties ti•rhile upholdin4 the spirit and intent of the zoniii(i oi-dinance. IX. It is further concluded that since the zoning ordinance authoi°izes such uses upon the finding that it will not be detrimental to the adopted comprehen- sive plan and surrounding properties and where the applicant can meet all the prescribed conditions, this permit cannot be denied. Furthermore, there were no sound reasons found for denying the request. That all concerns can be effectively mitiqated thr°ough the attachment and enforcement of conditions. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL A) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT l. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permi ts. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main- tenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property in accordance within the concept presented to the Zoning Adjustor. Minoi° variations when approv- ed by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and qeneral allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Direct light from any exterior area lightinq fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. . , . . . PAGE 8 ' . CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 5) All current standards of the /lgricultural-Suburban zone and Section 4.24.040, as amended shall be complJed with in the development of the site. 6) Landscaping shall be provided for this site, in conformance with Stand- ards as identified in Section 4.07A.120 Landscaping. 7) A 6-foot sight-obscuring barrier shall be provided along the west pro- perty line of this proposal to provide a buffer for the existing single family use located immediately west of this site. Such barrier shall consist of live plantings and berming. 8) Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning storniwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 9) Applicant shall comply with all agency's regulations as amended prior to the issuance of building permits. 10) That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43. 21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution '77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of fina'l disposition of this application, and prior to any on-site improvements. 11) Structures shall be constructed of materials similar to residential structures in the immediate vicinity. B) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1) Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet along 12th Avenue for right of way pur- poses alonq with a 20 foot radius at the corner of 12th Avenue and McDonald Road. 2) Applicant shall construct cenient concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement along 12th Avenue from the west property line to McDonald Road. 3) Applicant shall vacate Mor-row Road and 14th Avenue or improve tivith cement concrete curb, sidewalk and paving. 4) Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Enqineering the road, drainage and access plans prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit on the property. C) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1} Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulation5 of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District. 2) The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW, Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his heirs and successors shall further aqree not to oppose or protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement dist- rict (ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as arnended. 3) Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. 4) The project shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide collection systems. , . ' . . : . . , PAr, E 9 CUE-10-81 and VE-83-81 D) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1) Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal sys- tems may be authorized. 2) A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Enqineer and the Health Officer qrior to the issuance of any buildinq permit for this lot. E) SPOKl1NE VALLEY FIRE DISTRICT 1) A new main is reouired to be laid on 14th Avenue between McDonald Road and Woodlawn Road. A1so on Morrow Road between 12th and 14th Avenues. 2) This proposed site will require between 4-6 fire hydrants depending on the site layout. 3) The applicant shall comply with all the requirements of the Uniform Buildinq Code and fire code. F) DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 1) Drainfield will not be allowed under a oaved area. ENTERED THIS r0 DAY OF ~U_n,l , 1981 PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY r,RANTED UNDER COUNTY CODE, SECTION 4.25.030 . TI-IOMAS L. DAVIS ' ZONING ADJUSTOR FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATjEtST BY: l ~~~clCl_jC/ yl yl ~'jl •/'j , / PURSUANT TO SECTION 4.25.090 OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE, THIS ORDER CONSTITUTES THE FINAL DECISION OF THE ZONING ADJUSTOR, APPEALABLE TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF SPOKANE COUNTY WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THL WRITTEN DECISION BY THE ZONING ADJUSTOR AND SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE AT THE END OF THE APPEAL PERIOD. • • ZON ;NG ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WP:SHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF VE-83-81/CUE-10-81: CHANGE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, OF CONDITIONS AND WVE-44-84; WAIVER OF ) DECISION AND VIOLATIOW - SPOKANE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION ) CONDITIONS THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Zoning Acjustor of Spokane Cour►ty, iri hearing this application, hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal", and the Zoriirig Ad,justor of Spokane Courity having held a public hearing on December 12, 1984, and having fully considered all testimony presented there- at, and further having visi'ted the site and vicinity in question, and having rendered a decision on the 28th day of December, 1984, APPROVING said pmposal , does hereby make the followirig: FINDINGS OF FACT l, That the proposal is gerierally located south of arid adjace►it to 12th Avenue, lying easterly and adjacent to McDonal d Road and Morrow Road in Section 22-25-44. 2. That the proposal consists of 1) to authorize existirig and proposed site plan chariges which are not in conformarice with the projects original approval; 2) to allow garage facilities ori site - pmject plan indicated a total of three (3) garages and three (3) carports. The applicants site plarl further proposes modi fi cations to the approved I andscape pl an. 3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Compreherisive Land Use Pl ari indi cates Urbari usage of the area encompassed by the proposal. That the p ropos al gerie ral 1 y does con fo nn to the dens i ty ari d use gui del i ries o f the Cowity Larid Use P1 an. 4. That the site is zo►ied Agricultural-Suburbari which would allow this use upon approval of this application. 5. That the existing land uses in the area ot proposal inclade a church to the immediate east of the property, a school to the south and urbari resi deriti al development to the west and riorth. 6. That the proposed variatioris and chariges in this development result from needs of the retirement community at the present site and are not attempts to circumvent zoni.ng regulations of the county. 7. The faci-lity has been constructed i►i general conformance with the origin al approval. However, minor modifications have been made a►id are required to meet the reasonable needs of the facilities residents. 8. That pursua►it to the State Envi roiimental Pol i cy Act the Envi ronrrental checkl ist arid other data has been reviewed arid theproject has beeri found to not have ariy pmbable si gni fi cant adverse impacts to the physi cal envi mnment. A Declaration of Non-Signficance was issued on November 26, 1984 and sent to four (4) agericies of jurisdiction. That none of the agericies reviewing the checklist indi cated that a more detai led envi mnrrerital review shoul d be provi ded. 9. That the proposed site plan iTidicates that setbacks, parking, height of the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane Cou►ity Zoning Ordinance. 10. That no one appeared to oppose the proposal nor were any written comments adverse to the proposal received. 11. Condi tions submi tted by the Cou►ity Uti 1 i ties Departmerit were i ricl uded iri the prior approval and rio changes are made to them in this action. 12. That the proper legal requiremerits for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have beeri met. CONCLUSION Following review of the Planning Department file, corisideration of the public testimony arid circumstances in the area, the Zoning Ac~justor concludes that the proposal is not detrimental arid is compatible to the public health, safety arid welfare. continued ~ PAGE 2 FINDINGS OF FACT,,DECISION ANQ.CONDiTIONS UE-83-81/CUE-10-81 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS WVE-44=84 WAIVER OF VIOLATION DECISIUN From the foregoing Findings, the Zoning Adjustor hereby in APPROVING the proposal, establishes the following conditions: CONOITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) The site be developed in conformance with the plan submitted at the Zoning Adjustor hearing of Decerrber 12, 1984 and stamped and lnitialled as the approved plot plan. 2} All buildings and structures require building permits as per Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code. 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Department of Building and Safety and Fi re Di stri ct No. 1 detai 1 ed pl aris must be submi tted for revi ew and approval in order to assure that al l fi re and bui 1 ding code requi rements can be met. 4) Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. 5) Much of the property's "open space" is currently beirig utilized for on-site sewage disposal. The proposed chaiiges must no1'encroach upon/within the sewage disposal area. This includes, but is not limited to: parkings, hard-surfacing of any kirid, and/or the pl anting of 1 arge species of pl ant life (trees). 6) Prior to issuance of a building permit the applica►it must submit a drainage plan to the County Engineer for review and approval. DATED THIS 28th DAY OF December , 1984. 4M4D~jGLS, U G ADJUSTOR SPOKANE Ct7UNTY, WASHINGTON NOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAI. WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THIS DATE. ~ . . ' SPOKANE COUNTY 20NYNG'ADJUSTOR - PUBLIC HEARING TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 AGENDA: DECEMBER 12, 1984 TIME: 1:15 P.M. PLACE: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPT., N. 121 Jefferson, Spokane, WA., 99260 B. CONOITIONAL USE PERMITS (CONTINUED) * S. CUW-36-82 CHANGE OF ~ONDfTIONS Generally oca ed on the northeast corner of McFarl ane and Broaks Roads in Section 30-25-41. PROPOSAL: The applicant requests a change of conditions from the Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions of the Zoning Adjustor, dated Feb, 9, 1983. The requested changes are: 1) Condition A.1 - change the nunfier of cars allawe on the site f rom 40 to 80. 2) Conditi, A.3 - change days of operation firom weekends to weekdays (8 a.m. to 5 p.m. and be able to sell parts. 3) Conditi+ A.4 - change the number of enployees t( applicant and family members only ta twv 12) employees. Also, the appli- ~ ~ cant' requests permit approval to allow for farm implement repair work. SITE SIZE: 2 acres (approx.) Z4NED; Agricultural APpLICANT: Mike Tareski C. WAIVER OF VIOLATION/CHANGE OF CONDITIONS * 6. wVE-44-84 & CUE-10-81/VE-83-81 WAIYER OF VIOLATION/CHANGE OFJOI~DITIO~S Generally located south of an ad~acen to 12th Ave., lying easterly and adjacent to McDonald Rd. and Morrow Road in Section 22-25-44. PROPOSAL: 1) To -authorize existing and proposed site plan •changes which are not in confornance with the original approval of this project. 2) To allow additional garage and carport facilitii to be located on the site. 3) To consi der modi fi cations of the proposed landscaping plan submitted with File #CllE-10-81 J11E-83-81. SITE SIZE: 5.7 acres ZONED: Agricultural-Suburbar APPLICANT: Spokane Baptist Association Homes, c/o Denny Christensen ~ - 3- . s r i • a LA { 1 ~ ~I X ~ , ~4 ~ ~ , . . ' ~ tjc 2 ru£ . ~ ~ ~ - _ • _ " r Q . . + ~ ~ • 41 M P Y E • • r • . :s ~ d 'r~v~• wYM • 7 l~ • . ~ s ~v ~ t ` 7 t + :+~4' ~ , 7 [ n • . AV E ~ _ . t ~1• . . - RL 4 ~ _ + ~ , ~ a ~~~~p 10 a'.., ; a 1 • ~ o T ~t~~...tJr' • ~ ~ A~ E ~ 1`',~~-"' w 4a-•-~ '1 12Y~ .~f t TN 'V 6 ~ • ~ . ~ ~ { , 7 -~.~::+-~"l.l"'~' i 1 8 - Q s a a VjEmP4~ . x C13 8 1 ~ a. ~ • . ~ r ~ 8 3 ~ _ vE 1 Q x ~ a •o T K ~ ~ + - 7 r la . : ~ a ; oa" 14 E oj~~ u • ~ ~ . "o ~ 1ri . Q• i•• M~ ~ r ~ a. . s . ~ RIV£~5~~~' Z ~ !t . • f+c ? - ~ ~pRAG,tJ~ v. . . • • ~ 3 t ~ t ~ ~ _ . ~ r_ ~ - ' ~ ~ ~rI . 4TH AVE J rr~^~. . t< a • o:w-. Y3i~.~ > t~ , • ~ t~, ~ _ j - ~ ;s.,,:.~- OC ~ " C, 9D T . lJ"' b~r U AVL[i AY E • , k y^ . . ~ . 46 • ~~i ~ ~ . g T.. a J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i0 - ~ ' _ ~ . ' v SX {ad . i T . W; 4 tiatx ~ ~ . 1 r1~ti' t { ~N V ~.~~.~~4f^"". -+`7Gfi~ •~r:'- t T~~ t 4v • •44 x 1L 1L y ~ CUIEMO ' . ~ , 51CrE - 1 ~ J ~ 3--8 ssi ' . . . 1L • r ty ~ A6 ° qn ~ T R ^ \ ' ~ ~ M z - ~ ' ~t'~ ~t ~ • A 0 ~ ~ ` a Qr 2A ~ J h ~4 2`.M ~ r . . i h"s ~z ~ • , . . ' - ' `~POKANE COUNTY' PLANNING DEPARTMENT n,, Y :'APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF CONDITIONS ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED Z00097-- CG,~ Date: October 9, 1984 Application No. : Ut - 93-91 Name of Applicant: Spokane Baptiet Association Homes Street Address of Applicant: N. 7007 Wiscomb, Spokane, 99208 City: Spokane State: Wa• Zip Code: 99208 Tele. No. 489-7612 Existing Zone ClassificaVton: Ag Suburban Date Existing Zone Classification Estabiished: LEGAI, DESCRIPTION * Section 22 Township 25 Range 44 LIVYi ~ Parcel Number 22543-9113 and 22543-9101 Parcel 22343-9133: E 78R of ptn of SE 1/4 of Sl9 1/4 lyg S of 12th Ave. exc SE 1/4 of SE of S'd 1/¢ and exc E 325 ft. of NE 1/¢ of''SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 and exc platted ptn. Parcel 22543-9101: Ptn of, the I1 160 ft. of the E 325 ft, of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of SW 1/4 lyg S of 12th Ave. plus that ptn of vacated Niorrow Street adj- oining properties described above. Yacated 14th Ave: S 30 ft. of vacated 14th Ave. from D:cDonald Rd. W to vacated Murrow Rd. PROPOSED CHANGE OF CONDITIONS: Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval. (Cite the applicable condition from the Findings and Order of the HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE's public hearing. ) See attaehed sheet. - Give detailed explanation of request for change in the status of the proposal. 1) Additional property has been added. 2) Variations between the construction documents and actual on-site conditions and County agency requests necessitated the relocation Vi ~VAL 1• 3Uhe tenants of the retirement home-have reauested aaraaes and car- ports which were not origonally provided. IF DEVELOPMENT OF THE SITE WILL BE CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY BY THIS REQUEST, OR THF PROPERTY NAS BOUNDARIES DiFFERENT l"HAN ORIGiNALLY PROPOSED, A REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED. SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT , J. Denny Christenson Address, if different than Applicant) N. 9321 Division St. Spokane, Wa. 99218 Z22/Z-c • ~-PPLICATION FOR ZONE RECL SIFICATION--continued-2 ~ This, section of the application will provide the Planning Department's Staff with written verification that the applicant has -had preliminary consultation with the ~rencies identified. " Risults of the preliminary consultation should be incorporat- ' ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department. 1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE . A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. 5' nattfre) (Date) .1 ' 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE • - A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our quirements for submittal of this proposal for rez ne have been satisfied. designated ater urveyor for this site is . . - -dy u re ate 3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME)~,~~-2t~ ~i~a►c~a.~~_. ~Q~c.1r- r.~c-,.~~ a) The proposal (is (is not) located within the boundary of our service area. • c) ave not) been made to serve thls b) Satisfactory arrangements qt!r~>"Aml- proposal. W(are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water. _ ~ o - ( ate) /g ~ `ignature ~ 4. BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary ccnsultation has been held to discuss the pNoposal. Gur requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. T proposal is located in Fire District . 'gnature ate 5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The Xrepgnatu has been informed of our requirements and st nd ds. ~kj /d / q ~ (Date) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MAOE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- LEDGE. POSEDTFOR ZONERREC ASSIFACAT ONOWORR'IOF~ X~ToTHE OWN RE ATTACH D HEREMFITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF. (Signed Date: (2, ~~18~ (Address)N•q3M DiViSiAyN Phone: 4*!~)-714000 Zip: 0)G12~ NOTARY ~ Date: NOTARY SEAL: ~ SIG ATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Date: - / ~ : ' Rev. 2/3/81 • ' ' ' v.~/~`1=!% - ~,'I~ ~.,'ti~ 1 c.~ . • , ' . .f~•. - SPOKANE COUNTY PLArJNING DEPARTMENT . APPtICATIONS BEFORE THE IONING ADJUSTOR/BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT - . . •Certificate of Exemption No.: ~ 4m Application No.: jiVE-44-84 Name of Appl i cant: Spckawe Baptist Association Homes Street Address: W. 7007 iJiscomb Ave. City: Spokane State: Wash. Zip Code:99208 Tele. No. 489'7612 Name of Property Owner(s): Spokane Baptist Association Homes Requested Action(s) (Circle Appropriate Action): Yariance(s) Conditional Use Permit Administrative Appeal. Temporary Permit /Waiver of Violationi 4W Other: Zero Lot Line Non-Conforming Lot/Use * FOR STAFF USE ONLY * * Ci te Ordi nance Secti on : ~ ~ 5• 0,_-7C * Section o?~ Township Range Property Size: * * Existing Zoning : [~C(l Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~c~rC-anJ * 1 * Legal Checked by: Hearing Date: Receipt * **********************,~,y,******************** Existing Use of Property: Retirement Home Proposed Use of Property: Retirement Home SbOeet Address of Property: East 12900 12th Ave. LEGAZ DESCRIPTION Section 22 Tcwnship 25 Range 4.4 EtOi Parcel Number 22543-9113 and 22543-9101 Parcel 22543-9133: E 78R of ptn of SE 1/4 of SW 1/¢ lyg S of 12th Ave. exc SE 1/4 of SE of S'rl 1/4 and exc E 325 ft. of NE 1/4 of~ SE 1/4 of S'r! 1/4 and exc platted ptn. Farcel 22543-9101: Ptn of, the I1 160 ft. of the E 325 ft. of N~, 1/4 of SE 1/4 of Sw 1/4 lyg S of 12tn ave. plus tnat ptn of vacated PIorrow Street adj- oining properties described above. Vacated 14th Ave: S 30 ft. of vacated 14th Ave. from D:cDcnald Rd. W to vacated Murrow Rd. Conditional Use Permit CUE-IO-819 VE-33-81 I SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE. IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAIO OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/ HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED: S i yiieu . ;1• J.-~_ "~Jl~'~.cr~; - ^~t° : ~2~~, ~ Address:k).cT32-0 _L)iV600. ~~(,n? Cl-~-. Phone No.: 4(0")-7(cBO ~ -•--.r r. . i -iDCAR'.',-•SkA:.: NOTARY : OATE : t 1 Z r l9 - ~ _ _ ~ ' ~1•' , _ _ 'r • , _ . - . _ A. VAR 'CES' ' ' • - l. view of the ove information, what special circumstances (beyond your _ . co trol or actio deprive you of the same general rights and privileges of ther property wners within the same zone and vicinity? 2. If the varia were grante , how would it affect neignboring properties o r i mp rovemen ? 4ON-CONFORMING B. CONDITION USES, ZERO LOT LINE, USE, TEMPORARY PERMITS, ETC. l. Please ive a concise explanat n of the proposal including size, hours of operatio , expected traffic and other features, etc. C. WAIVER OF VIOLATION , - 1. How or why was the structure established utside the provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance? The completed and approved constructian documents necessitated relocating the building within the requi•red front yard area due to variations between tinose aocuments ana tne ac-tua..L on-sitie ccnaiZiona. D.J, SIGid-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS ~ COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A pre iminary consultation has been held to discuss_ the proposal. The _ appli a t as been informed of requirement and standards. r S gnat (Date (Sign-off Waived ~ by Planning Staff) ~ COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT ~ A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The applicant has been infornied of requirements and standards. p 9 /g 1- Si nat ) Da ' (Sign-aff Waived • by Planning Staff) ~ COU14TY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT reliminary consultati n has been held to discuss the proposal. The p ic t has bee info d of requirements and standards. ' n re-I (DatLd (Sign-off Waived by Planning Staff) WATER PURVEYOR ( i f appl i cabl e) Name: -~rR~cy Cv(z' ,r'~;' a) The roposalrl5Yis not located within the boundary of our se,rvice-:Grea. b) We rare not able to serve this site with adequate water: c) Satisfactory arrangements av /have not been made to - ~Q~ i gnature ( Date ) ( Si ~n=uf~f~1 ai -ve-~} by Piaftniri5 AoD o;-A r4TI, j - • ` ~ ~ t1~ ~ - / f}~ C ~Q7T~ A•~?~ ~ST~l~lM t_:)s SPOKANE ENYI RONMEHTAL`OR-DINANCE (WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230 (3) Determination of Non-Significance FTLE #WVE-44-84/CUE-10-81 & YE-83-81 Change of Conditions DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 1) To authorize existing and p roposed site plan dhanges which are not in conformance with tfie origi.nal approval of this project (CUE-10-81 and YE-83-81); 2) To allow additional garage and carport facilities to be located an the site; and 3) To consider nadiflcations of the proposed landscaping plan submitted wi'th File #CUE-10.-83/yE-83-81. PROPONENT: Spokane Baptist Association Homes,c/o Denny Ch ristensen, N. 9329 Division, Spokane, WA 99218. LOCATION OF APPLICATION: South and acjacent 12th Avenue, lying easte rly and adj acent to McDonald Road and Morrow Road in Section 22-25-44. DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this p roposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Envimnmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2)(c). This decision was made after revieN of the completed Enviranmental Checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the publ i c on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340 (2) and WAC 197-11-340 (3) and (4) and Spokane Environmental 0 rdinance 11.10.100; the lead agency will not act on this pmposal for fifteen (15) ddys from the date issued. CDMMENTS MUST 8E SUBMITTED BY DECEMBER 11. 19$4 at 5:00 P.M. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: DOUGLAS S. ADAMS, ZONIN6 ADJUSTOR, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH. Address: N. 721 Jefferson Street, Broadwdy Centre B1 dg. , Spokane, Wa. , 99260. Phone: (509) 456-2205 DATE ISSUED: N e er 26, 1984 SIGNATIlRE: APPEAL: You may appeal this determination to the Spokane County Planning Depart- ment at N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA. , 99260 no 1 ater than ten (10) days afte r the written decision, by lette r stating specific reasons for the appeal. You should be p repared to make specific factual objections. Cantact Doug Adams to read or ask about the procedures far SEPA appeals. * This "DNS" form was mailed to agencies and departments as noted. 1} WA State Dept, of Ecology CSpokane) 2) INTEROFFICE MAIL, Health District IV3} INTEROFFICE MAIL, Engr. 4ffi ce 4) INTEROFPICE MAIL, Bldg. Codes ~i.i[. . urricy- or uuwrr rtiutNr.rr Syulr.Aot l:ouoty, MAshing[oo t,,,.is% Adluatrr _ • YMUM: Spukaiir (:,unt y bidlarrc ~a~y~r_• i SU1SJtt:f; Enginrer'r W+s4J1[!vn tor Varleoice Krqurrtr 1'ne cunQltluno derlgnainJ below sra •ubmltted fue yuur cunsld tlun lu tltt: oSttnt ut AvPttc.ciol, ru. -buE ~t4-4 lCuG /4- ~"l/re ~dG g3-s-/ Applitan['s N+me:~,p/r7rr[~fsit! lveatton: S21, T_21~N., s("(Z/ E.W.M. LJ Conotruct rqad in accordsnca vith County standard• Eur futute publlc rtgh[ oF vay "2tscc x." ~ Agrae to dellver to Spukana C4un[y, rLght-of-way Eor • futura G,unty road. ~ Join and parcicipate ln [he tormation of • County ifoad [sptovuaent DIS[cicc (RID) or Road Ioptovssent Yrolect •anetioned by 5pokane Couaty. Ackaovledge tha[ Spokane Coun[y twu rw rtsponsibtlity co bulld, itiprove, ulntaln oc srrvice the prtvata road. Applleant mwt sigo rnd racord Syuknne Cc,unty Pnglnder forn "Notlce to Publle Mo. 1 of 5/5/81 in order to comply wlch apuve raqulramcntr. ~ Prlvate road• ourt be aignsd in u cocdanee wi[R the provislon• of Spokane County board of Councy Coeisslonsri Rssolution No. 80-1592 aa amanQed. aod coaatructed 1n conforunN ++lth Sactlon 3.07, Sec[lons A and I o[ Chat titlt. E] 7here aay bc a futuee neod tor a puDllc roed to "rvs the dsscrlaad propsrty. r] 11;eee to dellver to Spokane Couaty the rLghtroEway for a tuturs road. Ij Jolrt and participsts ta the forutlan o[ s Couaty Raad imptoveaent Distcict ([tD) ac bad Lyrovo"nt projeet senctioaod by Spokanr County. ~ AcknurleCi• that Spoksae Couaty ha• no rtsponsibilitr to build, irptovs. asincain or sarviee !M privat• roaQ. ~ L] APDlieant wst •iju and recor4 Spokaas Couaty 4nyioaoe forr 'Ibcica to Public lio. S 2" ot 5/5181 la order to cosply vich •bove seQulreNnts. ~ Private roa4s mus[ bt stgaod la sccocdiencte vlth the pcovirtons of Spoiun• Countr board of Couocy Comtssioaare Mesolution Ib. 60-1591 u wndod, and conatructid in tonforuoee vith Seccioa 3.07, isction• A aW I ot that title. Conatruct • road to serv the psoprrty in accosdancts v1th adopted County Standards ~ for privato roads. D AcknowIedR• that Spokane Countr tu• ao nspoasibilicy to build, laptovs, "intain ar aarvice the prirac• raad. L] Should Spokans County be petitioned to coastruct or maintain a publlc road sarving ~ tha pcopettY in aceordaace witb provislons lQW 36.81, the owors. their helr• or agalsas wst: , 1) Agrse to deliver to Spoluns Couoty + properly sign*d snd execattd right-o[-Yey Eeed to covec wtficient laod Eor the road. 2) Jllgree co Jolo and pairticipat• in the tonatlon of a Ceunty Qoad IaiprovNent hoject sanctioned by 6pokaas CounRy. D Aeplicaet muc •ign Rnd record 8polune County tnginser fosa 'Notica to PuEllc No. 3 0! 515/81 lo ordsr to comply vich apove reQulreMncs. n Prlvtce coad& mwt Lt algttad in accordaaca +rtth the provlslon• of Spolcaas Couaty Yoard aE G+unty Commisslooee• bsolution Ib. 80-1592 u4sonded, and coaitructed fn conforsenc• v1[h Sectloo S.01. fection• A and I ot that titla. D '[h• eaaem*nt(s) which ore represented aa a part of lhl• appllcstSon do not comply vlth Spokane County scandardo !or prlvats road• (sN Spokac►o County Eoard of Com- ■isstoner• Reiolutloa Mo. 80-1392 amendad). It im, thersfore, the Bnginser's recommendactoo ptior to considecation of the varlancs that the •asement be broughc into compllanc• rith Spokans Couaty ac+adard• or the vsrttace bt dented. ~ Applicant should be advlsed [hat so appcoach perslt wiit be obtatned frou the Cuunty fingfntot priur to the conettuetlon ot any nov driveway •pproaches. %em!v&r/req P(2.ioR -vo uA,vice a~ o_ ~~k'tId~n~~ 1~ciz~ti~i+ ~E Al~v~icAtiJ~' Ml.t_. f Su.bMA 0. ct-zR iKoic PzaN T ~lt (10,W.!172 ,aArQ 4ppRorq~ . ' ~ ~ i . ZONING ADJUSTOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF VE-83-81/CUE-10-81: CHANGE ) FINDINGS OF FACT, OF CONDITIONS AND WVE-44-84; WAIVER OF ) DECISION AND VIOLATIO14 - SPOKANE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION ) CONDITIONS THIS MATTER, Being the cotisideratiori by the Zonirig Adjustor of Spokane Courity, in hearirtig this application, hereiiiafter referred to as the "Proposal", aiid the Zo►ii►ig Adjustor of Spokane Cou►ity having hel d a publ i c hearing orl Decenber 12, 1984, and having fully considered all testinany presented there- at, and further having visited the site and vicinity in questiori, aiid having rendered a decision on the 28th day of December, 1984, APPROVING said proposal, does hereby make the followirig: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proposal is gerierally located south of arid adjacerit to 12th Avenue, lying easterly aiid ac~jacerit to McDoriald Road aiid Morrow Road in Section 22-25-44. 2. That the proposal consists of 1) to authorize existing a►id proposed site plan cha►iges which are not in conformarice with the projects origilial apprnval ; 2) to al low garage faci 1 i ties oii si te - project pl an indi cated a total of three (3) garages and three (3) carports. The applicants site plail further proposes modi fi catioris to the approved I andscape pl an. 3. That the adopted Spokane County Getieralized Comp rehensive Land Use . Plan indicates Urbari usage of the area enconipassed by the proposal. That the proposal geiieral ly does conform to the densi ty aiid tise gui del ines of the County Larid Use P1 an. 4. That the site is zoried Agricultural -Suburban whicn would allow this use upon approval of this application. 5. That the existing land uses in the area of p roposal include achurch to the immediate east of the property, a school to the south aiid urbari residential development to the west aiid iiorth. 6. That the proposed variatioris and chariges in t:iis development result from needs of the retirement community at the preserit site and are not attempts to ci rcumvent zoniiig regul ations of the cowity. 7. The facility has beeri constructed in geiieral conformance with the origirial apprroval. However, minor modi ficatioris have been made arid are requi red to meet the reasortiable needs of the facilities residents. 8. That pursuant to the State Envi ronrrental Pol i cy Act the Envi ronmental checkl ist drid other data has been reviewed arid theproject has beeri found to iiot have ariy probable si gni fi cant adverse impacts to the physi cal eiivi ronment. A Declaration of Nori-Sigiificaiice was issued oii Noveriber 26, 1984 and sent to four (4) agericies of jurisdictioii. That iione of the agericies reviewing the checklist iiidicated that a more detailed eiiviroiimerital review should be provided. 9. That the proposed si te pl an indi cates that setback5, parking, hei ght of the structure(s) will conform to the Spokane Cowtty Zoning Ordinaiice. 10. That no one appeared to oppose the proposal rior were ariy written commeiits adverse to the proposal received. 11. Conditions submi tted by the Couiity Uti 1 i ties Departmerit were i ricl uded in the prior approval arid iio chariges are made to them i►i this action. 12. That the proper legal requirements for advertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have beeri met. CONCLUSION Following review of the Planning Department file, corisideration of the public testimony arid circurnsta,ices in the area, the Zoriirig Adjustor concludes that the proposal is not detrimental aiid is compatible to the public health, 5afety aiid wel fare. Contlnued ` . PAGE 2 . FINUIIiGS OF FACT,DECISI(?N AND CONDITIONS VE-83-81/CUE-10-81 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS WVE-44-84 WAIVER OF YIOLA7ION DECISIUN From the foregoing Findings, the Zoriing Adjustor hereby in APPROVING the proposal, establishes the following conditioris: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) The site be developed in conformance with the plari submitted at the Zoning Adjustor hearing of Decentier 12, 1984 aiid stamped and iriitialled as the approved plot plari. 2) Al l bui 1 dings and structures requi re bui 1 ding permi ts as per Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code. 3) Prior to the issuance of building permits, the Department of Building and Safety and Fire District No. 1 detailed plans must be submitted for re view aiid approval in order, to assure that al1 fi re and bui 1 ding code requi rement5 can be met. 4) Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently prohibited. 5) Pfuch of the property's "open space" is curreritly beiiig utilized for on-site 5ewage disposal. The proposed chariges must notericroach upon/within the sewage disposal area. This includes, but is not limited to: parkings, hard-surfacing of any kirid, aiid/or the plantirig of large species of plant life (trees). 6) Prior to issuance of a building permit the applicarit must submit a drainage plan to the County Engineer for review and appiroval. DATEO THIS 28th DAY OF Decenber , 1984. f , CS 10rlllA~U !L 4~D GLA~DSTO R SPOKAPJE CDUNTY , WASH INGTON PiOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE AN APPEAL WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS OF THIS DATE. t 1 • OFf ICE OF TbE SPOKANE COUNTY PLAIVNING DEPART1VjENT ~~y Dcte Plarch 30 1981 To Enqineerin , Utilities, Biailding and Safety, Health District, and '208' Staff From-_ _ _ _ ZONING. Subject Zoninq Ad,justor. Attached is a request for a Conditional Use Permit located in an area that your agency may want to review and comment on. Please have all comment5 returned to this office by April 15, 1981. Thank you, R E C E 1 V E D ~ GARRY R. THOP1PSON ~A~lf C11tf!!I'1 tbf~lllEIR Assi stant Zoni ng Admi ni strator APR - 2 1981 Attachment GRT:cmw L 1,1 .7 . ~ . `y ;z _ ~ I ~ . ' . . . - ,7 ~r~l O T.F~ ~ ~ ~ 4~fF s h' !9o c1~ / K8y510t1~ U. ~ ~;e'rr ~ ~ j.~: 'T~G 3 i '~'•'2 ~.{l~. " \ ~ ~ r -c .'S ~ i j • ~ 1 3 ; . i: ~ i ~ i; , ; •.r. ElemenicrY ~ , ~ , - ~ ~a ~ 2 i . • p• ~l i -~v,f .-N SChoO! ,5' a,. r, •i ~`S; 240~1~1'~ I `'y 2 " 'xy~ z S ~alt`f l~ E. ( ( ~No. ra -5,;-!•~~ f/~~ . 3 r$~'Z^' 31 W • 7!' y ' I / J~• , , . $ ° `I ul -i ' 'i^ i,: I 2 ~ ~ ~o S ~ Jb S ~4 ~;`3 j2 /iI l• ,~,II ,g '9 '.ii~~ %2` 'y'~':'`r' ,y,~;y~~,~~ - - I - _ - - - - , ,R'----------. - ' 'a=- DGs-1TH 4 _7_ _ - - 2 3 s, i 'r p4 3 , s. ~ - , t - - - , y~ : . `~'I ; - ~ • . I 4 ti y ia ,2 ~ d ~ 9 ~r .z ~ c~.• a'' 9.,.~:.y~. . 12' ~ I ;.r ,v z ,31 3 So' N..1 - _ 9{~ ve.~ N' ~2Z3 0 • .zT_ -i•.r.~- ~ - , J. .Z• ' t• r ~ N~kTrt~ yE, : ! , , ~ " '.J' • ~ .f ~ ' ~ r • . ~ ' ~ 4~ n' ¢ 3~ M S I Z r c. I: r' 1~•i: ~~'c ~ a. ;I ~ 'I y~ U ~ •jl. _ -,w+• ~ . s~f`~ _ .Y•' ~ . rJ ~ N _ , ~ • ` i i 9 >4J c ~ 9: /o •7 cv . F y i_ n io N t 2 I j s~' II. 'ti_`___~~°- l"~ .I~ s'i n E TN A&. NQ 22'13 91) 'T WTH ~'3 2 T 4 - i 0 T~i1 41;, ;30. ~'EL VE'tJ7•} ~cr B7ZrW ~ E VEIY'~H AV JN-7.2 6.3~r• C 4 3 2 ~ I 4 r 3 _ / 4 :5• 3 d 'I Zc 3 ~ :e'SK n c r lY 5 c a d 9 i^ -4 T ELF H AVEI .i ._u~-- - _ T`-' 4vF-No.l'~9? ' ~15 a ~ Z 3 13T1-t AVE 2 p, ~ i ~ 7~+t. : S~• 4 Q ~ ~ ` ~ ?D • a ~ a~~rti ~ 4 i r 1_' _ (Yi ~ C 13r" Avenue N' Z00w In ~ "dD I Z 's ~ I 1 6 T ` Q + . 7.~ ~ V ~ WTN ' ~e ~ ~ • ~ (v ~ S . • " ~ ~ a < s ~ 14 I ~ ~,'a,- ~ Z7~ ~,i~ ~ )94Ttl•:.; ~ ~ 14t6 ~ I 4 tb A veC►Ue N4 2006 - /.Q. ~ 40 z ~ ~ h(o.Z006 - 6d ~ 20 i 9 r~•~ u1 •~2 r3 ' ~ Z ~3 7: a~, :~'''Tf~.,i.•~~ i~ ~s i~c ,sA s a ~ iq s„~ 'r 15*'~ Avv-riue 20Q~c .ti rcr ~ v ! 117 ._s1_~~~ ` ` • ) 6 • n ; 3 4 ~ . • . t . • I 3. ~ : ~ } G f~j'.? •F'~ .~:'p.,..L:~'~' ~ , ~ST E' 3 ~~V L~ i I i 7 6 ~ C9 !L* . j16+~ hAv - ~o G4' C. o• 223I_ Co' - • =-1 i , .~-Y--r--~:. - 0 ~ - 4- i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ l ~ ~ ~ -i! ~ 4 ~ ~e > ~ ~ i r'~ i , . . SPOKANE COUNTY ZONINr_, ADJUSTOR CASE N0. 641 ~-/04/ Office of Spoftane County Pianning Qepar-Lment N. 721 Jefferson, Broadway Centre Bldg. Spokane, t-lA 99260 Telephone: 456-2205 HEARING DATE. zONING AD,IUSTOR E I ~ APPLICATIOPJ FOR CONDITIQNAL USE- P`RMIT `9 7HE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONINr ADJUSTOR ppllCdllt: SPOKANE BAPTIST ASSOCIATION HOMES, Inc. .'ldlllf)9 Add!"ESS: North 7007 Wiscomb St., Spokaue, Washiagton ZIP: 99208 Phone fYumber: Residence Business 489-7612 .1t.,(../( 77a . Ndrur2 of Request: Permit provisions fo proposed Senior Citizen Residence Facilitv of 104 single and two bedroom residenCial units, Soutl,~ti'est Corne. ;Jellet"al LOCdl1 t,% 12Y1i & McDonald ~&QCr10h G:vnStl 23 r,dfiCJ@ 4-1 ZOfI@ GZassification: Agricultural Suhurbaii Leqal Description (Attach Easement Leqal Descriation if it is a part of this aoDlicati& 22543-9133 E78R of ptn of SEI/4 of SW1/4 lyg S-;of 12th Ave exc SEI/4 of SEI/4 of S%t'Ij4 & exc E325ft of NE114 of SEI/4 of SW 1/4 S exc platted ptn, 22543_9101 (portion of) The N160ft of the E325ft o£ NE1/4 of SEI/4 of 3Vv' 1/.l 1` g S of 12rh Ave. Plus That portion of vacated Morrow Street adjoining properties above described. (Vacation Requestec. ) Source of Lecal Description: sI»,<:11:0 c,,«L,<<, ;;ssuss,>r Spokane County Assessors Parcel Nurloer: / ;•~~-~~o~ R. blhat is the size of ,the property: Approxiina[eIy s, s acres acre = 43,560 sq. 160 260' +30' (Street Vac. Length: 6701 klidth: 260' B. 1. Will this oroposal require any new water hook-ups: Yes , Number Whdt iS th2 oroposed SOUY'Ce Of water: vERn WATER and POWER DISTRTCT C. l. 1,4ill this proposal create additional sewage in the area: YES "IO 2. Now does applicant oropose in disposing of the sewage: o N SIT E- Septic tank / drainfield systems with provisions for future sewer tie-in. D. :s the app7icant aware af any current or past land use actions on this property: . ` , • • NOTICE 0F PU4LIC HEA,.~,,.~ Before the Zoning Adjustor County of Spokane IN THE MATTER OF: HEARING DATE Applicant: SQokane Baptist Association ) WEDNESDAY, Aoril 22, 1981 9:00 a.m. Homes, Inc. ) N. 7007 Wiscomb ) N. 721 Jefferson, Broadway Centre Bldg. Spokane, WA 99208 j Hearinq Room, 2nd floor File Number: CUE-10-81 ) ) Request: Senior Citizen Retirement Home) Any interested person may appear before ) the Zoning Adjustor ) < ) ) Zone Classification: Aqrricultural - ) Suburban ) County Code:4.04.130 (a) and 4.24.040 ) . . • PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is proposing a two stor.y senior citizen residents facility containing 104 single and two bedroom residential units on a parcel of land approximatelv 5.5 acres in size. The Spokane County Zoning Ordinance in this instance provides that usch a use may be considered in accordance with conditional standards as provides by the Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance. . • ~ ENUIRONMENTAL IMPACT: A topic of discussion at this hearinc~ may b~e H~hether the Zoninq Adjustor has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental imoacts of the pro- oosal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: "...In the event that the further investiqations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the pro- posal, an EIS shall be prepared." AODITIONAL INFORMATION ' Please contact: Sookane County Planning Department Telephone No: 456-2205 VICINITY MAP LEGAL DESCRIPTION " .~=h-~ Secti on 22 Townshi p 25 Range 44 EWM 6Tt~ r ' ~ ` - v~-~~ Parcel 22543-9113 and 22543-9101 V~. I N W F j 77 "AV E • . Site Size: Approximatelv 5.5 acres i ; ~ 8 T H Av E~ Parcel 22543-9133: E 78 R of ptn of SE 1/4 of _,t, , 22.,.. SW 1/4 lyq S of 12th Ave. exc SE 1/4 of SE 1/ of S:•J 1/4 and exc E 325 ft. of NE 1/4 of SE ~M , A~~ « . 1/4 of SW 1/4 and exc nl atted ptn. a, 22543-9101: Ptn of, the N 160 ft. of the E 04 4-1 , 325 ft. of NE 1/4 of SE 1/4 of S4J 1/4 ly4 S ~ ~ k o of 12th Ave. plus that ptn of vacated Morrow Street adjoininq prooerties above described. ctaaVAE ~ ~ IZ7M AvE 12T v I X~ i9rf+ 13 Tri 2 J ~ 4 f 147H Q ~LZ.~~L lSTH~ nvF . 15 7~ I 1000 . Q, Q Q • ~ J Q. z 3 a Z W d~~ . ' ~ _ ~ u • Y V . ' ~ ~.l ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ,o j RO 0 Cp ~?!~FICk OF COUNTY ENGIM:ERS s1'oiCANf: , SJASHI N(, PON 'TU: Zoning AdministraCur FROri: Cvunty Engineer's Office SU$JECT: Requirements DATE: April 20, 1981 VW-37-81 If approved: Applicant must file notice to the public that thie property ie served by a private road. Said private road construction must confarm to Spokane County Road Standerds. CUN-9-8I No conditions at this time. CUW-11-61 No conditions at this time. VS•65-51 If approved: Applicant must ff.le notice to [t►e public that thia property ie served by a private road. Said private road construction must conform to Spokane County Road Scandards. VN-35-81 If approved: Applicant must file notice to the public that this property is served by a private road. Said private road construction must conform to Spokane County Road Standards. VN -36 -81 I f approved : Applican[ must file notice to the public that this pxoperty is eerved by a private road. Said private road construction must conform to Spokaae County Road Standards. ; C[1E-10-81 ~ See prevlous memo to plaaniag department. ' VW-34-81 If approved: Applicant must file notice to the public that this property is served by a private road. Said private road construction must conform to Spokane County Road Standards. . OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS SQOKANE, WA5HINGTON T0: Zonirig Adjustor FROM: County Engineeres Office SUBJECT: 2oning Requirements DA?E: April 3rd, 1981 CUE-10 -81: Conditions of Approval: 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet along 12Ch Avenue for right-of-way purposes along wfth a 20 foot radiua et the corner af 12th Avenue and McDonald Road. 2. Applicaat ahall construcC cement concrete curb, sideWalk aad pave to existing pavement along 12th Avenue froa the west property line to McDonald road. 3. Applicant shell vacate Morror Raed and 14th Avenue ar improve with cement conct'ete curb, sidewalk and paving. 4. Applicant sha11 submit for approvaL by the Spokane Couaty Engineer the road, drainege and accese plona prior Co the isauance of a building permft on the property. . - • ' . . PdOTICr i)r Pi1GLIC FIrAi? Before tiie Zoninq Ad,justor County of Spokane IN' THE MATTER OF: HEA':IP;G Dr,?E Applicant: Sookane Baptist Association );,!EDNESOAY, h1AY 13, 1981 9:00 a.m. Homes, Inc. ) N. 7007 Wiscomb ) N. 721 Jefferson, ar-oadway Centre 61dq, Spo~ane, b!A 99208 ~ HearinQ Room, 2nd flour Fi le 'cium5er: CJE-10-81 ) ) Request: Senior Citizrn Retirement Home) Any interested person may appear before ) the Zoning Adjustcr ) < ) NOTE: THIS ITEM 6JAS COtJTINUED FRO^1 THE ) APRIL 22, 1981 HEARING FOR ADDITIOPIAL Zone Classification: aqi-icultural- ) INFORh1ATIO"d T3 BE SUBMITTED TO THE Suburban ) PLANNINI; DEPAZTMENT AND ALSO GIVIN; THE County Code:4•04.130 (a) and 4.24.040 ) APPLICANT ANO NEIGHBORINr, PROPERTY OWPJERS THE OPPORTUNITY TO MEET TO CLARIFY THE FROPOSED PROJECT. - ' ?nOJECi DESCRIPTIGP; The aoplicant is nronosinq a two story senior citizen residents `acility contain-ing 104 sinqle and two bedroom residential units on aparcel of land anproximatelv 5.5 acres in size. The Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance in this instance nrovides that usch a use mav be considered in accordance with conditional standards as provides by the SPokare Count.y , Zoninq Ordinance. . • ~ ENVIROfdMENTAL IhiPACT: A topic of discussion at this hearinn may be whether the Zoninq Adjustor has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental imoacts of the oI-C oosal. The State Environmental Policy Act G1AC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: "...In the event that the further investiqations authorized by this section do not provide informal reasonably sufficient to assess any notential adverse environr;ental impacts of the pro- posal, an EIS shall be prepared." OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEERS SPOKANE, WASHINGTON T0: Zoning Adjuator FROM: Couaty Engineerls Office SUBJECT: 2oning Requirements DA?E: April 3rd, 1981 CUE-10-81: Conditfons of Approval: 1. Applicant shall dedicate S feet along 12th Avenue for right-of-way purposes along with a 20 foot radius at the corner of 12th Avenue and McDonald Road. 2. Applicaat shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement along 12th Avenue from the west property line to McDonald road. 3. Applicant shall vacete Mb rror Aosd and 14th Avenue or improve with cement concrete curb, sidewalk aad paving. 4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer the road, drainage aad access plans prior to the iesuance of a building permit on the property. I • . 4 • A Holm'an Gardens construction set 9 Fo I'8 ~ I17 n pro. • No ` . 10 t9 s ~ri~,~~, . . ~ t, ' ' _ • . ,Y_.S ,I . ' ~r~ V~ ~`~n ~ ' • Y y ' ~ ~ a , ~f. ' ~ j.3*r.'r. ; i' ~ Iltl'1 . 'Er! ~ yp ' ) . t. ~ n' 1 . WE . . " ~z:' ~W►y~,+~ . ~ aY by .s ' f r ~ ~ ~ ` ~~11~~►,. ~ 4~ } ~ ~ ~ . t•.p J ~~y`. ~ . •1 7 ' . . • . 4~ .'F . . . ~ ~ _ ~y,~,~. 74 {'YI,1 t .~j~ - . . ' . ' h •{j ~ -.~i i F. . p - • _ . . • yr-. ~i. ~ y`, lil~►.,~ ~.l~Ei. ~ 1 ,r . . . . ` . • 'R ~~nc, y4?%' .l~V - a. « r . . . . ,y -n • - . `i'~~17 ' ' ~ . ; . . z.,~ • ttst~it : • , i~,pOg " Grnund-bteaking ctre- Pr6tided b0 resideAts of all tke invocatian; the Eev. Holman; son of Nellit lt: pr" ittoniee tor Holman 0sr- EMths• J o h n H a u g a n, a d- Holman, whom the center , degs, an edvanced-coneept At sn overall cost 6f;4.I ministretor of Holman ie natned sfter; and Robert retirement residence to be million, Hblman Gardens Is GBrdens and Lilac Plsza (s F. 80chell, area ininistsr ' . eonetructed at 22th artd the flfth largest cort- sitnilar faci2ity in Spa foer AmeticanBaptiatChut- • McDonald, were held Sun- struction projeet under- kane), who served es mas- chea. ~ day. May 8. taken in SpokanP County ter of ceremonles; Clar- ' Everyttilng M aow aet Iot this 7ear; tt ranlcs behind etice Hart, former presi- futlscaleconstructiAntoDe- ISC, Cawlea Publishfng, dent oE the board of di- ~ ' -stn.andworklsexpectedto Valley General Hospital, rectors, Spokane Baptiat wwnr; go npidly, with the firat e4d Cavanaugb's. Association Homes, Inc., onor roll reaideats acheduIed to Takipg pert in Sunday's who was involved in early t~~„- m ` • ove ifh e4rIY thls fall. ground-breaking cere- efforts to get Holman Gar- reIeASW ~ ~A ` Tht "Tdti program" coq- monies were Charles O. dens estabtished; the Rev. fRe$ fo=: vept to be employed at Hol- ~ughary Jr., president of Frank R. Brougher, pastor N~rth P/ inan~Gardena wf!! maka it ~e board of dfreetors, Spo- of the Spokaae Valtey Bep- IF% theequalo[anyretirement lwne Baptist Aasociation tist Church; Gilbert and The third quarter honor emwc• tenter in the country, ae• Homee Ino.; the Rev. Stan- Myrtle Erickson, repre- roll relesaed: by Narth ~ eording to spokesmen for ley F. Qunaten, retired sentingcharterresidentsof p~eaJuniorHigAincludee q~~j` Spokane Baptis[ Asso- Lutheran pasWr, who gave the new facility; Keith M. ~ ciatluh Homes Inc., builder perfect grade polnt aver- ~+ir~r ' eges by ninth araders 4R4% af thb tacility. Heather Glasgow, ffitrk Holman Gardens will fea- ~ Laxton, Courtney Ota and o~ ture a year-round swim- /'~V ~~~OI~CS IIS~~~ Crissy Rendall, aad +r►aa. . ming poot, indoor walking- L/ seventh greders Amy BuA- jogging track, hot tub-apa, nell, Jodi Frod, Ali:sa snd 88 apartmenta, eaeh Two senlora, seven sW a.. Da. a►►wa T~r.rw ~iPP and Michelle Waltf- with ib own sundeck. 30- uniora, and nine so- r~r.~rua..~'n,n,+~vu owti.w.a wright. c i a 1, r e c r e a t 1 o n a l a n d i ph TNI B«ion. MMU Endw,1.n WM« .a and ee omores earned 4.0 grade ~ w«~« Othera nstr[ed to the hon- spiritual progrems will be g v+~ r.~.a,. sa.. A..+,puy +r+e«.~, or roll follow: ~i~ p4int averagea to head up Norrln* A~derwn, Tr1N BNMy, i~nk. e.y.. the recent Central Valley M,",~,,, T„qT, ~ N,a,.~,,, ow*eft ~,,,a„a,, wr M ~ High School honor roll. ^.p. c~r w«wo J.m.. u.w. ww»ftww,►WwOr+a+•J.w. 00- S„r. • BM^ 4d~ 6xv~Y, p Wik Chnwrwn. TaEA bM. Llr S'Y". CavN i~. K°n0 Senlora with streight-A a.n~ a.,, ore.n, a.m oNe...~, r.w~• K~,w. w.r o„N,, cyw. ,~,.n K ~!e , 9"" w un~~„n, y. en~eo~ Mco«wa. ~ Whl ~/~~h grsdes were Kathy Grimes ~ and Shellj Ohler, jUjl101'S G.+RUe Msfun~3~nMtrom Jr~n~9dy~1, p~v~ Nwi µyaon New~y, MI~nN .wn s~*,nn iau 9oLrsn Mry J4,,. vnN-s. ~+NV w~x+ v.ma~w v.~ avm rnamr 1am. gt,ar t h f ~ e I . • -*F6'i~~ ~ - Q ~CJ ( major is. N-3rth ~ . ~ ~ j~i : 4G the ment ~ - . Sham 1'h% ~teunnf brosd "s'~F • . „n~1 vere WeSa1 ;1; ~ < ~,rna~e : ed by0 bTOAf have • ~ 'i }c,~,•,~ ,~Y , ' ~.A • ~ ~ ~1 ~ M. a 0 ~ ,.h gin* A ~sc,i, . .M%. • r ~c , yw .w.., _ ~ . ' _ a ~ t i • ' . . , . . O • (ixonnd-brpaking cert- Drovided.to teaidetfts of all the invocation; the Rev. Holfnan, son of lQeIlle .11[. P7montles for Hoiman Elar- faithe." John flaugan, ad- Holman, whom the center dens, itt advanced-concept At an overall cost of $4.1 ministrator of Holman ia named efter; ahd RAbert s~ retirement residence to be million, Holman Gardens is Gardens and Liiac Plaza (a IP. Bwrchell, atea miNlter coastructed at 12th and the fifth Iargest c'on- sfmilar facility in Spo- tot'AmericanBaptiatChur- :MeDbnaId, wete itelA Sui!- struction project under- kaae), who served gs maY- ci►ts, day, Mgy S. taken in Spokane County ter ai teremonies; Clar-' Everythingid no9v set for 'thfe Year; it nnks trehind ence Hart, [ormer presi- A.• huBscnteeortstructitirttebe-,, ISC, Cowles Publiahfng, aent of the board of di= blirt gin,aadworklsexpectedto valley Genera] Hospital, rectors, 5pokane Baptfsi Honor roll go rapidly, with the firat and Cavsnaugh's. Associativn Homes, Inr., „fcat reeidenks scheduled ta Taking part in 5unday's who was, involved in early move in early thls fall. graund-breaking cere- eftorts to get Holman Gar= reIeA$Gd Af wu ~a-. The "fnll ptogram" coq- monies were Charles O. dens eatablished; the Rev. fO~' 'cept to be employed at Hol- Laughary Jr., president of Frank R. Brougher, pastor North Pfnes ~ man Gardens will make it the board of directors, Spo- of the Spokane Valley Bap- theequalofanyretirement kane Baptist Association tist Church; Gilbert and 'I'he third quarteT twnor • aenter in the courrtry, ac- Komes Inc.; the Rev. Stsn- Myrtie Erickson, repre- roll released by North s" cording to apokesmen [or ZQY F. Gunsten, retired senttngchartermsidentsoi pinee JuniorHigh includes cha .t•:' . Spokane Baptist Asso- Lutheranpastor, whogave the new facility; Keith M. perfect gradepo int aver- mr ciatlonHomes Inc., bnilder sges by ninth graders ~p aof the facility. Heather Glasgow, Mark and Holman Gardens wW tea- Laxton, Courirtey Ota and c • ' ture h year-round swim- ~~~0'~~~ Crassy RandA11, and v+e, ming pool, indoor walking- I seveath gradera Amy Bun- : jogging track, hot tub-spa, nell, Jodi Frod, Altasa and 96 apartmeMs, each Two seniora, seven sw,or,ur. °iw „re~r~,~~PP and MiChelle Wain- wif.h its ovvn sundec$. So- TWa.+, Mn U. oW.+. w+o- wrlght. ~ - ttat, recreatianai and juniors, and nine SOph- tro.w.arr,e omores earned 4_0 grade W~« Othera named to the hon- apfriletAl progretns wttl be v„,or," w'°a^. st.m °uy ^^w'o°^ or rolt follow : . point averages to head up Korrine Antlenan. Trloh 0411ey. MU 9aya oN, . - . , the recent Central Valley 9'°°"'"F°'°.H°° "'°"~.R"'""a""`.""°" . KoMtrnM.MMCQ1.~nAen.ir~cy7udM~Y~~~T~~^~ AroKr~n. Dr~MS And~non. IA0h N- • High Se6ool honor roll. ^o^. ~r w~. J~ C+w. ~ ue~e»ewa«..H.Y.vsn~..,wa+s" y4i. Slnda &heY. R ErMk ToOtl MIM. UN Bryrlt. Crefs BuAI K1nR~Ay GrM+. Seniors with stcaight-A CN1k SafnOflblA PMn OWwvsll. CVps KrynM Koy p*yblE, CynRY~ MOart, ~{yOd, Wh~Ori 1 jh grsdea were Kathy Grfinea NaTW~ $tave NYB~~G PrMi~ PN4 er«,~ ~o«,.e c° oti. raduattng and Shelli Ohier; f ur~iors ~+M+.'~^o~~n~'*"~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 .ia~ ama4 ' ea~.., M.rJ.. Irrrr. rim wete Teresa Carine, Eric to... Mry..dn. naW Mr t~in il I _i g , 7 ~ r4' : . • . . y Mcrpai' McC = M. - + Lx.r.f>x.n kntMr fibnMf. Z'WO SLUdef115 Wlt}l Va]lQY B8C VLl, BUt Wn0(lbUP~ Kni . - .,.a...,., srn,. SC.•a< aoei T.~aoneEtora o<x,paBk*- - K° e,~~, u... oa,,.~ s.,w,. F~+o ties. She11eY Smith and and Kristin Xoke; soPho I,yiiynsps~ S~nH/Y JlMJbMai o."w.wM ,.n,~,w..,~~.,,.n w~1n'n' Rosalee Allan, will be mores were Brent Bischoff, p^ ~^^MJ^^+~^ Li~~~ a"^""~ ~•~^.~r~v.~i~.a.~. "-r - ,.aw.w,. µccq. Kn9ftn N.+.m. MOr vaW. M.mr.n. M.ww tm ua~. - among the 300 undergradu- R i c h a r d 8 r a u t i g a m, c~ a,.o« s~n ~...m u~a sbn n. w,o., r~.w r.o~,, ,n,,,o lvb" Atta and tnci qraduates who Chery! Constar~re, Debbie w.~,.': w`~'~aw.av~ ~ w°Wa ~ r'°'!" v~fll receive degrees in Getea, $erbara ~ianson, e~.^a. «.wc~rr~~ ~u► wr r..Mwk ,wwpolft..,w,wwwnr. Whitworth Colleqe'a 19A3 Branden Joaepb, 5cott m,i,n.°~`wa., wn c.~+.;:. p°s'„';' J0n n'"'. T'""@ °OO""' Rraduation. K a m e 1. 1~t o n i c a~ K i r k• °w'~' H0O01r"` °1"^' F~ n~.e.' ~ u&WW+r o" P-w wn» 0411s a..e wr. 6ww-. M+r ~la~. ri.,~r.++N. MM an+e. Whitworth's 93rd com- patrick end Nata Nstars• s~sE-•••~+bT~ c~.w..,e,,. °f"P,,,,~.,,,~..~.~~w•ro mencement will be held 1an• 'r0aO1 '"'"w"'°" lfay 15, 2:30 p.m., in the Other CV studente S SneAkeratthe potane Opera House. named ta the honor roU. event will be esrning a GPA of 3.4 ar bet- S okane Valley 't w _•r~•+iT~'-a7+ iea~ o ~ 3 N ~ 4 ~y~ ~ y~4~3 _ c~i2 ~.T 8µ~ ' v . ^ * ~ t ~o.t 1 ~ ~r S~',.. ~ v*5~ ~--w.~- Ys ty~ia • , g ~ ~ , }-./o " ~ ~n 0 • Z N ~ r ~ ,n s _ - . ~ '•;o`• ~ rvc 2.'t. 3 .d ; ~ i .c 3 ` " ~ ~ ` -t,.f ~ A ' f~• ~ _ ~ - , ~ rK ~ ~ ,3,,,, q .r.~-''- 3 ~ 'Q~ _ ~ T" i~ "o• ~a ~6.- :p . A„ l , ~ r ~ ; •1, : ~ ~ ~r _ 3 g { s~ CI' ~ 't, 2~ ~ • y{~4~o =t~ ti 1 -r. i _ NT~ _ ~ . y _ r r + / 4 '3 ? q _~.5~, 1• ~ ` ~ 10'1 s' H Q~ ~ . Ln . ~ • N*1163 AU i f :i• r 3 ; Z ;7 W LU ~ ~ • 9 3 t. 8 i :tl.y J ~ _ 1 • ~ ~C ~ ~ _ ~ - ~-_--r^" 'T *Z a IE LF ~ ~ ~ ~ pve _ a 4 ~o ~ _ H~ Zao4 AV~ ~ Z `O` ~ s q; ~3rn A,.,ranve 4 i r z s i~~ ~ ' ~r ~ 'i 4l~ y 3 a ~CU ~ ° tt42.00 , M~• ~ a, tb A ve n~ ~e ,4 Q ~ (~°a~ O .T'V ~ S ^1 ly ~•S t 7~•~•I } 1 ~ a - _ s w., 'd, ✓7 , 6d ~ lq .g Qs t6 S ~ y Na C v¢ ti5 ♦h Av En r----- , I ~'~Y t.Jp. a ' 9 t~ ~~j n d'v rs S~ Q 3 ti ~ ~Q ~ ~'}y l ti ~ , ~ ~ r9,.' f~..,•'}l` A ~ /f nV -'Jp ' ~V u tq,- rn+~'s 1 , 1, c =~'s, %E. t-' 9 = 'b ~ ~ ` i , "i' ~►'"3 ~ . 1 ~ . ! !7 Q ti B ~ p . . 'l 2 I 1~ dQ~ai _ _ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ I I _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ I I I I i 6 . , ~a n :,4 4. ~ g.