Loading...
2004, 12-21 Study Session MinutesAttendance: Councilmembers: Diana Wilhite, Mayor Rich Munson, Deputy Mayor Dick Denenny, Councilmember Mike DeVleming, Councilmember Mike Flanigan, Councilmember Gary Schimmels, Councilmember Steve Taylor, Councilmember MINUTES CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY STUDY SESSION Tuesday, December 21, 2004, 6:00 p.m. Staff: Dave Mercier, City Manager Nina Regor, Deputy City Manager Ken Thompson, Finance Director Neil Kersten, Public Works Director Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Tom Scholtens, Building Official Mike Jackson, Parks and Recreation Director Marina Sukup, Community Development Director Cal Walker, Police Chief Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Sue Pearson, Deputy City Clerk Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk Mayor Wilhite called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m., welcomed all in attendance, reminded everyone that this is a study session although some items would be open for public comment, and requested that all electronic devices be turned off for the duration of the meeting. Mayor Wilhite announced that there will be no public comment on items #1 and 2: 1. Unfinished Business: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 04 -054 — Area Wide Rezone (tabled 12- 14-04) — Scott Kuhta It was moved by Councilmember Denenny and seconded by Councilmember Flanigan, to take from the table the motion relating to the first reading of proposed ordinance 04 -054. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Deputy City Attorney Driskell then explained that an issue came up as to whether the area -wide rezone should properly be remanded back to the Planning Commission for formal entry of Findings of Fact, and accompanying rationale by the Planning Commission in their recommendation that this area -wide rezone be granted, changing from UR- 7* to UR -3.5. In further examination, Mr. Driskell said it is his opinion that is the correct assessment. He explained that an area -wide re -zone is a purely legislative matter; and he is not aware of any Washington State law which would support that a City Council would need to make formal Findings of Fact on an area -wide re -zone. However, Mr. Driskell said that this Council and staff were in a position where they could not draft all of this City's regulations upon incorporation, and therefore several regulations of Spokane County were adopted. He explained that the section of the zoning code referenced is 14.402.100 and 120; that section 120 requires entry of formal findings and also includes language making it clear that what is anticipated is that formal findings be entered on site - specific re- zones, but it is not clear on all the various types of rezones; and that it is his conclusion that since this is not excluded from that provision, that we must treat it as if it were included, and in taking the more cautious approach, it is recommended to remand this item back to the Planning Commission. Deputy Mayor Munson said that it has also been suggested that this Council look at remanding the offer not to re -zone all of that area; and questioned if that can also be included in the same motion remanding items back to the Planning Commission, or if that other offer should be done separately; which offer is the request by Centennial Properties to create a buffer area. Attorney Driskell stated it is his opinion that two separate motions would be best as they deal with two separate issues. Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 1 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 It was moved by Deputy Mayor Munson to remand proposed ordinance 04 -054 to the Planning Commission for formulization of Findings of Fact. There was no second and the motion was not acted upon. City Clerk Bainbridge reminded Council that there exists a prior motion on the table, that of advancing ordinance 04 -054 to a second reading. Councilmember Denenny, and Councilmember Flanigan as seconder, withdrew the motion to advance ordinance 04 -054 to a second reading. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Munson and seconded by Councilmember Denenny to remand Ordinance 04 -054 to the Planning Commission to formalize Findings of Fact. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. City Manager Mercier said that as Deputy Attorney Driskell stated, there was a second pending request that came forward last week from Centennial Properties for consideration of having their property held outside of the area -wide rezone. Mr. Driskell added that that request appears to have come forward for the first time last Tuesday; that Council has the option to deny the request as it was initially presented after the Planning Commission public hearing was closed; and also after consideration by the Planning Commission; or if Council would like to have consideration of that request, the proper procedure would be to remand the issue back to the Planning Commission with the instructions that the Commission give consideration to issue, keeping in mind that if that option were chosen, a public hearing would need to be noted. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Munson and seconded by Councilmember DeVleming, to remand the Centennial Properties request of excluding the Greenacres portion that they stated last week, and to instruct the Planning Commission to re -open the public hearing. Regarding notification of property owners in the affected area, Long Range Planner Kuhta explained that such a public hearing would require full notice of all property owners within 400 feet, which results in approximately 300 notices; and that placing the notice in the newspaper on the 31 would leave exactly 14 day's notice prior to such hearing. Mr. Kuhta added that Centennial Properties was among those notified of the original Planning Commission public hearing. Councilmember Denenny said that he feels Centennial Properties putting their request as part of the Comprehensive Plan process would be the better process. Concerning taking public comment, City Manager Mercier said that Attorney Driskell had previously explained about taking public comment on matters involving the public record and if Council did take public comment, to disregard such comments if they were in conflict with what was contained in the public record. Attorney Driskell said his concern last week was primarily about the comprehensive plan amendments and attached rezones; and that there is a lesser concern on this, although with the revised opinion as to the need for Findings of Fact, that he had not given that additional consideration, although this is purely a legislative matter. Attorney Driskell said he feels Council can take public comment on this matter at this level without getting into the merits of the issue. PUBLIC COMMENT ON PENDING MOTION, i.e., to remand the Centennial Request to Exclude the portion that they stated last week, in this Greenacres area, and to instruct the Planning Commission to re -open the public hearing: Bill Gothmann, 10010 East 48`", Planning Commission Chair: questioned if this would mean the Greenacres would have a hearing, and would this be a separate hearing or is this a different question. Attorney Driskell said this would be a supplementary, separate public hearing on this particular issue rather than re- opening everything; and regarding the Greenacres issue, staff would draft Findings of Fact to be presented to the Planning Commission and adoption, and would expect it to be just that one Planning Commission meeting on January 13. Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 2 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 Wayne Frost, Centennial Properties, 3320 N Argonne: said he is also confused; and asked if there will there be a public hearing as part of the remand back to the Planning Commission regarding the area -wide rezone? He explained that if the answer is yes, then he has an opportunity to speak and is not requesting any special accommodation; he said if he doesn't have that opportunity, then his comments are that he talked to staff several months ago regarding the area of Mission and Flora and the expectation of the roadway to pass through there; that when he asked staff when he should comment; he knew that the Planning Commission was having a hearings, but he also asked will he have an opportunity to address the Council and the answer was yes; that it was his understanding that the Planning Commission is not a decision making body but is advisory only and the Council is the decision making body; so it was his understanding that the most appropriate time to comment would be with Council; so that is what they did. He said it makes sense to look at this area of his and the adjacent lands; that he has talked with the community and it is his impression that the community is supportive of looking at this area, that it is a transition area, that a portion of it is zoned I -2 and that is used as a buffer between freeway /commercial and low- density residential. He said that doesn't happen in the real world but has happened in Spokane County; that with his ownership, even though a portion of it lies north of Mission which is now zoned low- density residential, it is still one block, and that one block has to be looked at as one block; that there is no imaginary line separating the two zones once this roadway goes through; and the community understands that. He said he does not know if there is a need for a second hearing and that it seems like a lot of trouble to go through for just this piece of property. He said that the area -wide re -zone is not a pressing issue for him; and feels extra effort to accommodate things in a short timeframe would not be necessary; and he said he suggested to staff that the appropriate method would be to treat this under the comprehensive plan; although he is not aware of the Council's timeframe, that he feels Council does not need to move so quickly as to shut out the public, the residents, and the landowners. Mary Pollard, Greenacres: she said this whole process is frustrating; that they want to build bridges in the community and they have put hopes on the comprehensive plan that there would be the availability of building in separation of UR 3.5 from UR7; and she does not see that being reflected in the new plan; that neighborhood plans need to happen; and she mentioned the formal letter which she gave to planning. James Pollard, 17216 East Baldwin: regarding the Centennial concern, he said the rezone brought up initial concerns; he said as a neighborhood they spoke with various developers, and would like to take some pressure off the City and planning and take the time to plan with the developers and the neighbors and develop their own plan that would fit into the comprehensive plan; and also that this process that they paid for contains several misconceptions, and they want to work with one another on the plans. Deputy Mayor Munson asked if we go forward as just voted with the Findings of Fact, and those Findings are approved by the Planning Commission and no action taken on the Centennial Properties' request, would that change the way things go; that it is his understanding that changes can be made at any time depending on the situation. Attorney Driskell said if Centennial Properties were seeking to change the zoning within the Comprehensive Plan designation that would go through the hearing examiner and that request can be made at any time. If, Mr. Driskell continued, the request is to go to a Comprehensive Plan change; that would have to go through the yearly process; so if the zone they want is not allowed under the Comprehensive Plan designation, they would have to get that changed before they could get the zone changed. Deputy Mayor Munson asked then if another alternative would be to go forward with the Findings of Fact regarding the Greenacres plan, and then not pass the ordinance until they come up with a plan together? Attorney Driskell agreed that would be an option; and it would cue things up in the event the Council wanted to adopt that, then the groundwork would have been made before the Planning Commission and formal findings would have been forwarded to the Council. City Manager Mercier said due to the additional questions tonight, it would be appropriate for staff to consider the dimensions of those questions, and he is not clear if the Pollards are asking to rescind the request for the rezone or if there are other intents; and staff needs to consider all alternatives and report Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 3 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 back; and that the pending question is whether to remand for a specific public hearing the request from Centennial Properties. Deputy Mayor Munson withdrew his motion; and Councilmember DeVleming withdrew his second. Councilmember Denenny mentioned, in light of the Pollards arriving at tonight's meeting a little late, he requested previous action be re- stated as a courtesy to them. City Clerk Bainbridge read the following motion, which was previously voted upon and unanimously passed: to remand ordinance 04 -054 to the Planning Commission to formulize Findings of Fact. 2. Proposed Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan — Scott Kuhta Deputy City Attorney Driskell explained that based on concerns similar to those expressed above, staff recommends these proposed amendments be remanded back to the Planning Commission for entry of Findings of Fact, which is anticipated to be addressed at the Planning Commission's January 13 meeting; and afterwards to come before Council for proposed second readings, January 25. It was then moved by Deputy Mayor Munson and seconded by Councilmember Denenny, to remand ordinances 04 -049, 04- 050, 04 -051, 04 -052, 04 -053; and CPA 08 -04 and CPA 04 -04, to the Planning Commission to formalize Findings of Fact. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 3. Motion Consideration: Appointments to Student Advisory Council — Councilmember DeVleming It was moved by Councilmember DeVleming and seconded by Deputy Mayor Munson to appoint Debi Gallagher as Business Representative, Amanda Clardie as the East Valley High School representative, and Parks Director Mike Jackson as City Manager's designee representative to the Student Advisory Council. Councilmember DeVleming mentioned that Debi Gallagher works for the American Cancer Society, and has previous involvement with students in the Relay for Life and the Chase Youth Commission, and demonstrated a desire for this appointment. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment; no comments were offered. 4. Motion Consideration: Change Order for Audio Visual Equipment, Data Communication, Cabling, Security System, and Card Access System for CenterPlace — Steve Worley Engineer Worley explained the request as per his Request for Council Action form, and added that staff and the Project Architect have reviewed the costs and schedule impacts associated and recommend Council approval. After brief discussion on what the change order includes, Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. No comments were offered. It was moved by Councilmember Denenny and seconded, to accept the change order to aid the audio /visual package, and authorize the City Manager's signature. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. 5. Sending a Petition to the Department of Ecology (DOE) Concerning Adopting the Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) under DOE's Rulemaking Regulations — Neil Kersten Public Works Director Kersten explained that the Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) is proposing to finalize a water quality analysis that shows there is no additional capacity for discharges of dissolved oxygen into portions of the Spokane River, and that process is known as TMDL — total maximum daily load; that the water quality rules authorize a process whereby the particular uses in a water body can be evaluated to identify whether those uses are existing or even attainable; then water quality criteria can be adopted that protects existing and attainable uses. Mr. Kersten said that uses that are not existing or attainable can be removed from the water quality standards; this process is known as a "Use Attainability Analysis" or UAA. Mr. Kersten further explained that over the past two years, a coalition of dischargers has been conducting a UAA for that portion of the Spokane River from the Idaho border to just below the Long Lake Reservoir. This is the same area that is included within DOE's TMDL. The UAA Report is completed and will show that through an adaptive management approach, existing and attainable uses can be protected and at the same time, dischargers can continue to discharge into the river, using state of the art treatment technology that produces a high quality effluent that protects Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 4 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 the river. The UAA contains important information that should be considered by DOE before finalizing the TMDL because it analyzes actual existing and attainable uses. DOE's TMDL, on the other hand, is based on "class- based" standards that are uniformly applied across the state, without any adjustment for the different uses that may exist in a particular water body. The UAA can only be adopted through rulemaking. The rulemaking process requires a petition to be signed and presented to DOE by individuals authorized by their respective policy boards. The petition process is important because it is the only way that the rulemaking process can be started. Director Kersten also went over the cost of the available options. Discussion then ensued regarding the options along with the projected cost per resident, and of the petition in general. City Manager Mercier added that this would be the first time in this State that the UAA process is applied in this kind of examination, and the affect of the petition would ask to launch into a highly public and participatory rule- making process; and the basis is that currently the classification for standards for the Spokane River are based upon a state -wide classification system without the benefit of the specific assessment of the Spokane River conditions; and that is what the study practice has been for the UAA, so part of the rule making proposal would be to suggest two other high specific sub- classifications to this body of water as opposed to a state -wide classification system. He also stated that the final language of the petition was not available until yesterday, and that there was some uncertainty as to when this should be delivered to be the most effective. Mr. Mercier said it is felt that the petition should be delivered during current the remaining days of the 30 -day comment period; which is why we are seeking signatures, so that a filing can be made this Thursday. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Munson and seconded by Councilmember Denenny, to authorize the City Manager to sign the petition and forward it to the appropriate authorities. It was then moved to amend the motion to include the title of the petition: Petition for adoption, amendment or repeal of a State Administrative Rule (RCW 34.05.330). Vote by Acclamation to amend the motion: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried to amend the motion. Mayor Wilhite invited public comment. Richard Behm, 3626 S Ridgeview: he gave his credentials concerning his knowledge of the aquifer and accompanying issues with that and the River, and stated he feels Council is taking the right action, and to discharge anywhere else but within the watershed of the Spokane River would destroy the River; and that the aquifer flows in and out of the River. James Pollard, 17216 East Baldwin; said it is his understanding that the low flow for the Spokane River is 350 c.f.s. during the summer, and State watershed policy they are looking to increase that to 700 c.f.s.; and wants to know if that will aid or detract from the cause to help sewage levels in the river. Director Kersten said he feels Mr. Pollard is speaking of the dam relicensing; and they are proposing to increase the levels and increased flows will help the situation. Mayor Wilhite invited further public comment; no further comments were offered. Vote on the amended motion: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Abstentions: None. Motion carried. Mayor Wilhite called for a recess at 7:10 p.m.; she reconvened the meeting at 7:20 p.m. 6. Law Enforcement Report — Cal Walker Police Chief Walker gave his PowerPoint presentation explained that everything his department does focuses on their goals, and in keeping with contract negotiations, they strive to be a customer service driven city; and he added that his department is functioning with one less FTE then allotted for in 2004; and he believes the members of the community are pleased with the service and the quick response times. Chief Walker then explained the current situation with Crime check and 911. He explained that $1.3 million was allotted for crime check with funds split with Spokane Police Department (SPD) and Spokane County Sheriff's Office (SCSO); and that the SPD budget cuts will reduce the amount of money formerly put into crime check; and he mentioned that during 2003, crime check received more calls than 911. Chief Walker said that as a result of the City of Spokane removing in excess of $400,000 from crime check funding, the 911 Board came up with three plans: (1) reduce level of service for all agencies; (2) Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 5 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 reduce level of services for City of Spokane and maintain existing level for SCO and Spokane Valley; and (3) have three separate levels of services, one for each agency. This reduction would also amount to the loss of eight FTEs with a net reduction to Spokane Valley of $121,309; and that Spokane County and City of Spokane have tentatively chosen Plan 1; and that would mean shutting down crime check on some evenings, Sundays and holidays. Chief Walker explained that there still needs to be discussions among the three entities, as he fears with cuts to crime check, callers will be forced to use 911 thereby flooding those calls giving the potential for callers to get busy signals when trying to reach 911. Chief Walker said that in looking at that net reduction of $121,000, he would ask Council to consider keeping one detective as the City's representative, which would increase the allotted FTE's by that one person. City Manager Mercier added that there are currently 100.5 FTE's of occupied positions in the police department; and the proposal to fund this detective would maintain that same number as that other position would remain unfilled; he explained that he is aware that Council heard about crime check in more detail than today; and as this news of the evaporating grant funds is newly placed before Council, he would ask Council to consider that when we come back for the first meeting in January, staff will have recommendations and will seek Council guidance at that time. Councilmember DeVleming said he is concerned about his fellow policymakers affecting the City's police service without our input; and he requests we arrange discussion with all entities to see what can be done; and that he would hate to see the service level for the Valley being impacted without any discussion by this group. Councilmember Taylor said that this Plan 1 arrangement is being proposed to us without our input and reduces our level of services and forces us into a situation with no recourse. City Manager Mercier said it appears that the Board of County Commissioners may have already re- deployed officers, and asked Chief Walker if there has been an identified date when the crime check services would fall back to the plan 1 level. Chief Walker responded that until last week when he was formalizing this presentation, he had not received any documents other than conversational documents, but that one member of the County Commissioners had openly stated that they were still concerned with the impact on citizens and of the citizens of Spokane Valley suffering the same consequences because of situations in the City of Spokane. The question remains, can we provide the existing level of service and if so, at what cost. Chief Walker said those are unknown. Councilmember DeVleming echoed the concern to maintain the same level of service; and suggested that perhaps an invitation from the Mayor's desk to both entities to see if there is any chance to modify or change the plan, or come up with other options. Council expressed that it would be nice to have personal discussions among all legislative bodies before a definitive plan is decided upon. Chief Walker said he did attend one meeting with the County Commissioners and the Spokane Mayor and was told there were invitations to our City Council but no one attended that meeting. Councilmember Taylor said he supports Councilmember DeVleming's suggestion to meet with at least the County officials and perhaps the City of Spokane officials, that there is a need to do so quickly to discuss all options; and that we should let the County know, as our contract provider, how we want to weigh in on this issue. Mayor Wilhite added we would need figures as what it would cost to keep the level of service. City Manager Mercier stated that he images the options are available to sign on to whatever the universal plan is; or to quantify additional costs to this City if Council favored Plan 2 both with or without County participation; and if the County makes the decision not to function at the old level but to do so at a new adjusted level, then he expects those differences would wind up on our shoulders. Mayor Wilhite indicated she will set up a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners regarding this proposed reduction in services; and will also talk further with Chief Walker as there might be other creative ways to reduce the amount of reduction we will face; and she asks staff to bring back figures of what it would cost. Chief Walker stressed that time is of the essence; and Mayor Wilhite indicated she would call the County to see what their official reduction is in this regard. Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 6 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 Councilmember DeVleming stated that in regard to the previously mentioned meeting with no attendance from our City Council, that he received a letter Wednesday morning about a meeting the following Monday; but that he could not attend and there was no meeting date /time flexibility; and he realizes that Chief Walker and Deputy City Manager Regor did attend that meeting. City Manager Mercier added that when we first heard of such meeting attempts, it would have been nice to consult with our Mayor's calendar as well to get the time scheduled so all could participate. 7. Accomplishments Report — Nina Regor In the interest of time, and because of the missed opportunity for the public to hear the presentation, Council voiced their preference of having this presentation at a meeting in early January. 8. Advance Agenda Additions — Mayor Wilhite Discussion turned to when and in what form, the utility tax would be brought back before Council. It was determined to have that issue brought up as an administrative report at the January 11 meeting. Councilmember Schimmels also asked about perhaps later re- addressing the street bond issue. 11. Council check in — Dave Mercier Finance Director Thompson reported that formal bound copies of the 2005 budget will be distributed to Councilmembers tomorrow. 12. City Manager Comments — Dave Mercier As there were no City Manager Comments, and no further business, the meeting adjourned at 8:51 p.m. Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk VGA W l% -N.dU Diana Wilhite, Mayor Study Session Minutes of 12 -21 -04 Page 7 of 7 Approved by Council: 01 -11 -05 The Office of Financial Management (OFM) has adopted this form for members of the public who wish to petition a state agency to adopt. amend, or repeal an administrative rule (regulation). Full consideration will be given to a petitioner's request. Please complete the following: PETITIONER'S NAME (PLEASE PRINT) TELEPHONE NUMBER (INCLUDING AREA CODE) Cm' OF SPOKANE (509) 625 -6250 COUNTY OF SPOKANE (509) 477 -7289 KAISER ALUMINUM (509) 927 -6350 INLAND EMPIRE PAPER (509) 924-1911 CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE (208) 769 -2277 HAYDEN AREA REGIONAL SEWER BOARD (208) 772 -0672 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY (509) 921 -1000 LIBERTY LAKE SEWER AND WATER DISTRICT (509) 922 -9016 CITY OF POST FALLS (509) 777 -9857 NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE CITY OF SPOKANE 808 W. SPOKANE SPOKANE WA 99/o 1 FALLS BLVD COUNTY OF SPOKANE 1115 W. BROADWAY SPOKANE WA 99260 KAISER ALUMINUM P.O. Box 15108 SPOKANE WA 99215 INLAND EMPIRE PAPER 3320 NORTH ARGONNE ROAD SPOKANE WA 99206 CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE 710 MULLEN AVENUE COEUR ID 83814 D'ALENE HAYDEN AREA REGIONAL SEWER BOARD 171 E. HAYDEN AVE. HAYDEN LAKE ID 83835 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 11707 E. SPRAGUE SPOKANE WA 99206 VALLEY LIBERTY LAKE SEWER AND WATER DISTRICT 22510 E MISSION LIBERTY WA 99019 LAKE CITY OF POST FALLS 408 SPOKANE STREET POST FALLS ID 83814 AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING THE RULE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Please submit completed and signed form to the "Rules Coordinator" at the appropriate state agency. The agency will contact you within 60 days. Check all that apply below and explain on the back of this form with examples. Whenever possible. attach suggested , language. You may attach other pages if needed. ❑ 1. NEW: I am requesting that a new WAC be developed. I believe a new rule should be developed. ❑ The subject of this rule is: ❑ The rule will affect the following people: ❑ The need for the rule is: 504119308.02 PETITION FOR ADOPTION, AMENDMENT, OR REPEAL OF A STATE ADMINISTRATIVE RULE (RCW 34.05.330) • NI 2. AMEND: I am requesting a change to existing WAC 173 -201A -600, Table 600 and WAC 173- 201 A -602, Table 602 for WRIA 54 —Lower Spokane and WRIA 57— Middle Spokane (see attached proposed amended regulatory language) ❑ 3. REPEAL: I am requesting existing WAC be removed. I believe this rule should be changed or repealed because (check one or more): ® It does not do what it was intended to do. ® It imposes unreasonable costs. ❑ It is applied differently to public and pnvate parties. ❑ It is not clear. ❑ It is no longer needed. ❑ It is not authonzed. The agency has no authority to make this rule. ❑ It conflicts with another federal, state, or local law or rule. Please list number of the conflicting law or rule, if known: ❑ It duplicates another federal, state or local law or rule. Please list number of the duplicate law or rule, if known: ® Other (please explain): Please see attached. • PETITIONER'S SIGNATURES. CITY OF SPOKANE BY DATE: COUNTY OF SPOKANE: APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON THIS DAY OF DECEMBER, 2004. PHILLIP D. HARRIS, CHAIR M. KATE MCCASLIN, VICE -CHAIR TODD MEILKE, COMMISSIONER KAISER ALUMINUM BY DATE: INLAND EMPIRE PAPER BY DATE: CITY OF COEUR D'ALENE BY DATE: HAYDEN AREA REGIONAL SEWER BOARD BY DATE: scar , tnr, 02 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY BY DATE: 5 04 89308 02 LIBERTY LAKE SEWER AND WATER DISTRICT BY DATE: CITY OF POST FALLS BY DATE: Abbreviation General Description Aquatic Life Uses: (see WAC 173 -201A- 200(1)) Char Char. For the protection of spawning and early tributary rearing (e.g., first year juveniles) of native char (bull trout and Dolly Varden), and other associated aquatic life. Core Salmon/Trout Salmon and trout spawning, P' g! core rearing, and migration. For the protection of spawning, core rearing, and migration of salmon and trout, and other associated aquatic life. Noncore Salmon/Trout Salmon and trout spawning, noncore rearing, and migration. For the protection of spawning, noncore rearing, and migration of salmon and trout, and other associated aquatic life. Salmon Trout Rearing Salmon and trout rearing and migration only. For the protection of rearing and migration of salmon and trout, and other associated aquatic life. Redband Trout Non anadromous interior redband trout. For protection of waters where the only trout species is a non- anadromous form of self - reproducing interior redband trout (0. my► s), and other associated aquatic life. WAC 173 -201A -600, Table 600 Table 600 {Key to Table 602) PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR AMENDMENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600, TABLE 600 AND WAC 173 -201A -602, TABLE 602 54—LOWER SPOKANE AND WRJA 57—MIDDLE SPOKANE) PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR E NDMENT TO WAC 173 -201 A -600, TABLE 60t, ..,1D WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Warm Water Species Long Lake Reservoir Mixed Fishery Spokane River from Long Lake Dam, [river mile 33.91 to Nine Mile Bridge [river mile 58.0]) Spokane River Cold- and Cool -Water Mixed Fishery (Spokane River from Nine Mile Bridge [river mile 58.0] to the Idaho border [river mile 96.51) Indigenous warm water species. For the protection of waters where the dominant species under natural conditions would be temperature tolerant indigenous non - salmonid species. Examples include dace, redside shiner, chiselmouth, sucker, and northern pikeminnow. Brown trout spawning, trout rearing, foraging, and migration. For the protection of indigenous and non - indigenous fish species and other associated aquatic life, including jaJ cold water species summer rearing and migration in the riverine and transition reaches and in the epilimnion and jnetalimnion in the lacustrine reach: [b] brown trout spawning between Nine Mile Pam and the Little Spokane River: jc1 cool- and warm -water species spawning, summer rearing, and migration in the riverine and transition reaches: and 1 cold -water species summer fora Ling below the euphotic zone. Limited trout spawning, rearing, and migration. For the protection of indigenous and non - indigenous cold - and cool -water fish species: limited spawning, rearing, and migration of rainbow trout; and other associated aquatic life 50489308.02 -2- TABLE 602 Use Designations for Fresh Waters by Water Resource Inventory Area (WRIA) Spokane River from mouth to Long Lake Dam (river mile 3 3.9).' Spokane River from Long Lake Dam (river mile 33.9) to Nine Mile Bridge (river mile 58.0). Spokane River from Nine Mile Bridge (river mile 58.0) to the Idaho border river mile 96.5). 4n 0 Aquatic Life Uses 0 4 Recreational Uses Water Supply Uses L m 3 — 4 v -s u c hk) Misc. Uses .5 Trl CZI 0 Ct9 • 0 CO WAC 173 -201A -602, Table 602 PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR AMENDMENT TO WAC 173-201A-600, TABLE 600 AND WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Notes for WRIA 54: These.criteria take precedence over the dissolved oxygen criteria in WAC 173-201A-200. 1. Temperature shall not exceed a 1 -DMax of 211.0 °C due to human activities. When natural conditions exceed a 1 -DMax of 20.0 °C, no temperature increase will be allowed which will raise the receiving water temperature by greater than 0.3 °C; nor shall such temperature increases, at any time, exceed t = 34/(T 4- 9). 2 The average euphotic zone concentration of total phosphorus (as 2) shall not exceed 25µg/L during the period of June 1 to October 31. Temperature shall not exceed a 1 -DMax of 20.0 °C, due to human activities. When natural conditions exceed a 1 -DMax of 20.0°C, no temperature increase will be allowed which will raise the receiving water temperature by greater than 0.3 °C; nor shall such temperature increases, at any time, exceed t = 34/(T + 9). 3 Temperature shall not exceed a 1- DIVIax of 2011 °C due to human activitiess. When natural conditions exceed a 1 -DMax of 20.0 °C no temperature increase will be allowed which will raise the receiving water temperature by greater than 0.3 °C nor shall such temperature increases, at any time exceed t=34 /(T +9). 50489308.02 PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR AMENDMENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600, TABLE 600 AND WAC 173 -201A -602, TABLE 602 4. T e - a linimum water colu 50489308.02 -4 - 0. t r . or Rive orti n the re be 14 and 8.0 me L from September 15 through June 30. The 1 -dav minimum water column avcraee D.O. criterion for the Transitional. Lacustrine-Lpiliinni ..inn. and L.acustrine- Metalininion portions of the reservoir is 6.0 mg /L when the reservoir is thermally stratified (normally from Julv 1 through September 30). The 1 -dav minimum water column average D.O. criterion for the Lacustrine -Upper I lypolimnion portion of the reservoir is 5.0 mg/L when the reservoir is stratified. The 30- day average of the daily minimum water colunm average D.U. criterion (30- DADMinl for the Riverine. Transitional. Lacustrine- Epilimnion. and Lacustrine- Metalimnion portions of the reservoir is 8.0 ing/L when the reservoir is thermally stratified. The 1 -dav minimum water column average D.U. criterion for the entire reservoir is 8.0 mg/L when the reservoir is not stratified. Where conditions of barometric pressure. altitude. and water temperature preclude attainment of these p.0. criteria. D.O. levels must not be less than 90 percent saturation. In addition. sources of phosphorus must demonstrate progress towards maximizing the volume of the Lacustrine -Lower Hvpolimnion that is suitable for short -term foraeine by fish. with a lone -term coal of achieving a water colunvt average D.Q. value of 4.0 mg/L as a 1 -day minimum in this_uprtion of the reservoir. The delineation of these portions of the reservoir will vary in timing and location. Ilowever. the Riverine portion will be all depths generally from River Mile (RM) 58 to RM 53. the - I ransitional portion will be all depths generally from RM 53 to RM 46. and the Lacustrinc portion will be generally from RM 46 to RM 34. The delineation between the Metalimnion and Upper llypolinniion of the Lacustrine portion will normally be from a depth of 9 to 12 meters below the water surface. The delineation between the Upper and Lower portions of the 1 will he that depth where the U.O. concentration is greater than 5,0 mg/L. 5. The 1-day minimum water column average D.O. criteria for this sub - category of use are 9.5 mg/L from April 1 through Mav 31. 6.0 mg/L for June 1 through September 30. and 8.0 mWL for October 1 through March 31. The 30- DADMin U.U. criteria for this sub - category of use are 11.0 m2fL for April 1 through May 31 And 8.0 rnw'L for June 1 through September 30. Where conditions of barometric pressure. altitude. and water temperature preclude attainment of these D.Q. criteria, D.O. levels trust not be less than 90 percent saturation. • TABLE 602 Aquatic Life Uses Recreational Uses Water Supply Uses Misc. Uses Use Designations for Fresh Waters by Water Resource Inventory Area (WR1A) 121 1.3 Core Salmon/Trout Non-Core Salmon Salmon/Trout Rearing Redband Trout Warm Water Species Admis Pox!il -TMA% Ex Primary Cont Primary Cont Secondary Cont ansamou lndusirial W ater Agricultural Water Stock War Harvesting CoramerceiNavigation 2mTeoil T soriorpsav WRIA 57 Aliddie Spokane . . • _ _ . .=_ . _ - • - _ _ I - Lake Creek and all tributaries. 1 V V 1 I V V V V / 1 V 1 Spokane River from Nine Mile Bridge (river mile 58.0) to the Idaho border (river mile 96.5). V V V / Notes for WRI/it 57: These criteria take 'recedence over the dissolved ox , en criteria in WAC 173-201A-200. of 20.0°C. no temperature increase will at any time, exceed t = 34/(T ± 9). 4.11. li 1' 1 . 1, Temperature shall not exceed a 1-DMax of 20.0°C due to human activities. When natural conditions exceed a 1-DMax be allowed which will raise the receiving water temperature by greater than 0.3°C; nor shall such temperature increases, . • 2. f- -' , 19 ..0 W. .4 1 .8PI I - r• -11 ' ii 1 1 le . •eik 1 It 41141 14 .1 September 30. and 8.0 ragiL for October 1 through March 31. The 30-DADMin D.O. criteria for this sub-cateaory °fuse are 11.0 mit for April 1 through id . .4. : 4 44' 6 4 441 "4 1 414 $ 1.4 1 1 4 6 61 1 6 ,4411 el 1 .1_1. t_ 4l 9 .9 - 940 t 9 4 ' %. IL 4 9 " ' J2SLcriteria. D.Q. levels mu5.1 pot be les _ _ ' 4 ent saturation, 50489308.02 PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR AMENDMENT TO WAC 173-201A-600, TABLE 600 AND WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR IP NDMENT TO WAC 173-201A-600, TABLE 66, 4D WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 ATTACHMENT TO PETITION FOR AMENDMENT OF WAC 173 -201A -602, Table 602 for WRIA 54 —Lower Spokane and WRIA 57— Middle Spokane This Petition proposes to amend WAC 173-201A-600, Table 600 and WAC 173-201A-602, Table 602, for WRIA 54 —Lower Spokane and WRIA 57— Middle Spokane, as set forth in the attached strike- through proposed regulatory amendment. The amendment to WAC 173-201A-600, Table 600 and WAC 173 -201A -602, Table 602 for WRIA 54 —Lower Spokane and WRIA 57— Middle Spokane is necessary for the reasons set forth in the Petition, including this Attachment, and the Spokane River and Long Lake Reservoir Use Attainability Analysis ( "Spokane River UAA ") report, which is attached to this Petition. State and federal regulations allow uses in waterbodies to be revised through a Use Attainability Analysis ( "UAA ") (WAC 173 -201 A -440; 40 CFR 131.10). Federal regulations (40 CFR 131.3[g }) define a UAA as a structured scientific assessment of the factors affecting the attainment of the use that may include physical, chemical, biological, and economic factors. Section 131.10(g) provides that a UAA is justified if the State can demonstrate that attaining the currently designated use is not feasible because of any one of six specific factors, including either of the following: 4) Dams. diversions or other types of hydrologic modifications preclude the attainment of the use, and it is not feasible to restore the water body to its original condition or to operate such modification in a way that would result in the attainment of the use or The Spokane River UAA report defines the existing and attainable uses for the Spokane River from the Washington and Idaho Stateline (Stateline; River Mile [ "RM "] 96) to Long Lake Dam (RM 34), based on the above two factors (either of which is sufficient to result in modifying the use). Currently designated uses for the Spokane River are based on a statewide system of categorizing rivers and lakes under a class -based system that does not include a specific assessment of the existing and attainable uses for the Spokane River. The Clean Water Act also requires the Washington State Department of Ecology ( "Ecology ") to prepare a total maximum daily load ( "TMDL ") analysis and implementation plan for rivers and lakes that do not meet surface water quality standards. If a TMDL is prepared without specifically defining existing and attainable uses for a waterbody, the TMDL might use inappropriate surface water quality standards and, thus, develop inappropriate pollutant loading allocations for that waterbody. Ecology is currently developing a dissolved oxygen ( "DO ") TMDL plan for the Spokane River downstream of the Stateline Bridge (RM 96) to Long Lake Dam (RM 34; Ecology 2004e). The TMDL will establish regulatory limits on the discharge of pollutants that contribute to the drop in DO levels 50489308.02 The following additional information is provided in support of the Petition: 5) Physical conditions related to the natural features of the water body, such as the lack of a proper substrate, cover, flow, depth, pools, riffles, and the like, unrelated to water quality, preclude attainment of aquatic life protection uses; or .. . -6- PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR A .DMENT TO WAC 173 -201 A -600, TABLE 600 A AC 173 -201 A -602, TABLE 602 below surface water quality standards. In the case of the Spokane River, the primary oxygen - consuming pollutant is phosphorus. With regard to the Spokane River, a consortium of stakeholders came together to prepare the Spokane River UAA report in order to evaluate surface water quality standards that are appropriate and necessary to protect existing and attainable uses of the Spokane River based on the UAA factors referred to above. The goal of the Spokane River UAA sponsors is to assure the protection of the Spokane River by achieving surface water quality standards that are both attainable and protective of existing and attainable uses. The Spokane River UAA evaluates the biological and ecological basis for the designation of existing and attainable uses and recommends use designations and criteria appropriate to the Spokane River and Long Lake Reservoir. An in -depth assessment of information obtained from almost 300 documents was used to develop the Spokane River UAA. The document sources include state and federal environmental agencies, the Spokane Tribe of Indians ( "Spokane Tribe "), local agencies, universities in Idaho and Washington, and Avista Utilities ( "Avista "). (See Appendix C of the Spokane River UAA for a list of sources.) The source documents span studies from 1933 to 2004. Fisheries specialists, ecologists, and water resources and modeling experts evaluated this information and developed the recommendations contained in this report. (See Appendix G of the Spokane River UAA for resumes of contributing authors.) The Spokane River UAA sponsors include representatives from the following industries and municipalities in both Washington and Idaho: 1. City of Spokane 2. City of Spokane Valley 3. Spokane County 4. City of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 5. City of Post Falls 6. Hayden Regional Sewer and Water District 7. Liberty Lake Sewer and Water District 8. Kaiser Aluminum Corporation 9. Inland Empire Paper Company In the absence of specific current guidance, the Spokane River UAA has drawn from existing regulations, the Chesapeake Bay UAA, and numerous other UAAs, either adopted or underway. The Spokane River UAA report has three major elements: 1. Biological assessment and recommendation of designated uses and criteria (Part 2) 2. Implementation plan (Part 3) 3. Economic assessment (Part 4) 50489308.02 -7- f PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR ENDM ENT TO WAC 173 -201 A -600, TABLE 60L .4D WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Biological Assessment and Recommendation of Designated Uses and Criteria (Part 2) For purposes of the biological assessment, the Spokane River, beginning at the outlet of Coeur d'Alene Lake in Idaho, was divided into riverine (RM 112 to RM 58) and reservoir (RM 58 to RM 34) segments. The Spokane River UAA report, which is incorporated into this Petition, contains detailed recommendations covering the Spokane River from the Stateline (RM 96) to Long Lake Dam (RM 34). These are summarized as follows. Spokane River (RM 96 to RM 58): A new subcategory of use, referred to as "Spokane River Cold- and Cool -Water Mixed Fishery," should be established in Washington's surface water quality standards. This subcategory provides for: • The protection of indigenous and non- indigenous cold - and cool -water fish species and other associated aquatic life • Limited spawning, rearing, and migration of rainbow trout • A more site - specific temporal application of biologically based criteria The table below provides a summary of recommended DO criteria for the riverine reach (RM 96 to RM 58). Spokane River Cold- and Cool -Water Mixed Fishery (RM 96 to RM 58): Summary of Recommended DO Criteria Entire River Geographic Area April to May 1 -Day Minimum Value 30- DADMin Value DADMin Value = day average of the daily minimum June to September October to March 9.5 mg /L 6.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 11.0mg/L 8.0mg /L Long Lake Reservoir (RM 58 to RM 34): A new subcategory of use, referred to as "Long Lake Reservoir Mixed Fishery," should be established in Washington's surface water quality standards. This subcategory provides for: • The protection of indigenous and non - indigenous fish species and other associated aquatic life • Trout rearing, which exists within this reach • A more site - specific temporal and geographic application of biologically based criteria This subcategory relies on a seasonal and reservoir zone application of DO criteria, which protects the most sensitive life stages of salmonids (notably, rainbow trout) when and where those life stages occur. Similar to the Chesapeake Bay system (EPA, 2003b), recommended uses and DO criteria for Long Lake Reservoir vary depending on the location in the reservoir where different life 50489308 02 -8- PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR A`. .DMENT TO WAC 173-201A-600, TABLE 600 A AC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 stages and activities need to be supported. The table below summarizes the recommended DO criteria for the Long Lake Reservoir reach (RM 58 to RM 34). Long Lake Reservoir Mixed Fishery (RM 58 to RM 34): Summary of Recommended DO Criteria Geographic Area Riverine 1 -Day Minimum Value 30 DADMin Value Transitional 1 -Day Minimum Value 30- DADMin Value Lacustrine — Epilimnion 1 -Day Minimum Value 30- DADMin Value Lacustrine — Metalimnion 1 -Day Minimum Value 30- DADMin Value Lacustrine — Hypolimnion (Upper) 1 -Day Minimum Value 30- DADMin Value Lacustrine — Hypolimnion (Lower) 1 -Day Minimum Value 30- DADMin Value DADMin = day average of the daily minimum 50489308.02 July to September 1 October to June 6.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 6.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 6.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 6.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 5.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L 8.0 mg /L Narrative 2 8.0 mg /L To protect early brown trout spawners. the recommended winter DO reservoir criterion (8.0 mg /L applied as a 1 -day minimum) should also be applied within the riverine reach from mid - September (September 15) through the end of September (September 30). (The winter criterion already applies beginning on October 1.) The narrative criterion for the lower hypolimnion (expected to be less than 12 percent of the reservoir volume during August when the warmest temperatures and lowest DO levels are observed) requires sources to maximize the "suitable volume" (defined as water with temperatures below 20'C and DO levels above 5.0 mg /L). The narrative criterion also includes a long -term goal to achieve a 1- day minimum DO value of 4.0 mg/L on a spatially averaged basis. This narrative criterion will be implemented via the TMDL process since it requires that point and nonpoint sources continue to implement controls that minimize the volume of water that falls below 5.0 mg /L. Given that low DO values have been consistently observed since the 1970s, continued improvements to benthic conditions will ensure that existing uses within the lower hypolimnion will continue to be protected. PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR ENDMENT TO WAC 173-201A-600, TABLE 606 ..AD WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Dissolved Oxygen Saturation Considerations: The above recommendations for DO criteria do not take into account the fact that DO concentrations are a function of water temperature and elevation, in addition to the other factors already discussed at length in the Spokane River UAA report. As a result, the DO criteria shown in the two tables above should be applicable unless barometric pressure, altitude, and water temperature conditions preclude attainment of these criteria, in which case DO levels should not be less than 90 percent saturation. A percent saturation qualifier is included in both the Idaho and Oregon surface water quality standards. Ecology has recognized the importance of this in another recent process on the Chehalis River (Ecology, 2004g). Deficit Criterion of 0.2 mg /L Dissolved Oxygen: State surface water quality standards contain a criterion allowing for no more than a 0.2 mg/L deficit in DO from "natural or background" water quality where natural or background water quality is less than the established standard. The outcome related to the Draft TMDL (Ecology, 2004e) is almost totally driven by Ecology's conclusion that there is no assimilative capacity in the system for point sources. Ecology reaches this conclusion because of its application of the 0.2 mg/L DO deficit criterion to Long Lake Reservoir. The Spokane River UAA report provides analyses that explain why the 0.2 mg/L DO deficit criterion should not be applied to the reservoir, which is not a natural system, and recommends that this criterion not apply to the reservoir. The attached strike - through version of WAC 173-201A-600, Table 600 and WAC 173-201A-602, Table 602 (WRIA 54 -Lower Spokane and WRIA 57- Middle Spokane) contains the Petition's requested amended regulatory language. Attainable Surface Water Quality Standards: The Spokane River UAA biological assessment has shown that Ecology's current surface water quality criteria (9.5 mg/L absolute DO level and 0.2 mg/L differential DO level) cannot be met a high percentage of the time, regardless of treatment scenario, including removing the point source loads entirely from the Spokane River. One the other hand, the criteria proposed in the Spokane River UAA (protective of existing and attainable uses) can be met under most conditions, even recognizing the severity of 2001 low flows as the basis for the evaluation. Implementation Plan (Part 3) Parallel to this Spokane River UAA process, local stakeholders have been engaged in the TMDL process and have developed potential implementation strategies. For example, Spokane County and the City of Spokane jointly sponsored a one -day workshop on August 23, 2004, to evaluate advanced wastewater treatment technologies (CH2M HILL, 2004; Appendix F of the Spokane River UAA). The main objective of this workshop was to identify all proven and emerging technologies and to estimate what ranges of effluent phosphorus concentrations could be consistently and reliably achieved utilizing those technologies. The Spokane River UAA recommends a comprehensive implementation plan to control both point and nonpoint sources of pollutants to the Spokane River. The Spokane River UAA sponsors are committed to following this implementation plan as part of a long -term program to protect existing and attainable uses and achieve downstream surface water quality standards. The heart of the plan is a 50489308.02 -10- PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR A .DMENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600, TABLE 600 A AC 173 -201 A -602, TABLE 602 commitment to implement technologies to achieve a 95 percent reduction in the point source phosphorus load to the Spokane River. Elements of the plan include the following items: • 95 percent reduction in point source loading of phosphorus: The Rock Creek treatment facility on the Tualatin River in Oregon (owned and operated by Clean Water Services) has been used as a representation of the best proven large -scale treatment process technology. Results from the Rock Creek treatment facility were used to estimate phosphorus removal from point sources. This removal efficiency is defined as the "next level of treatment technology." While each point source on the Spokane River might choose different treatment technologies, this reference plant has been used to set a median effluent phosphorus concentration at 0.05 mg/L. This technology typically provides a treatment efficiency of greater than 99 percent. The Spokane River UAA sponsors have proposed to implement final effluent filtration to achieve this effluent phosphorus concentration in recognition of the fact that, during much of the time, the plants will operate significantly below this concentration. (This is documented with the Clean Water Services plant on the Tualatin River and with the Upper Occoquan plant in Northern Virginia, which achieves 0.01 mg/L effluent phosphorus about 40 percent of the time.) Because some phosphorus is currently being removed by secondary treatment, the reduction in load to the river due to final effluent filtration will be about 95 percent. • Best proven technology. The next level of treatment represents the best currently available, proven technology for point sources that will have any net environmental benefit on the Spokane River and Long Lake Reservoir. Improvements beyond this scenario reflect human- caused conditions that cannot be remedied. This is consistent with the conclusion from a very similar UAA process for the Chesapeake Bay (EPA, 2003b). • Water conservation and reuse. The Spokane River UAA sponsors have proposed the implementation of water conservation and reuse programs that will reduce hydraulic flow and further reduce the pounds of phosphorus discharged directly to the Spokane River. • Contributing to the control of nonpoint sources. The Spokane River UAA sponsors have proposed to contribute to the control of nonpoint sources, which Ecology recognizes to be the major contributor to Long Lake Reservoir DO sags (Ecology, 2004a). • Adaptive management strategy. The federal Clean Water Act requires that all feasible steps be taken to achieve the highest quality water attainable. However, in watersheds where nonpoint sources are a major contributor to pollution, feasible steps may be difficult to identify and implement. This situation is particularly applicable to the bottom (lower hypolimnion) of Long Lake Reservoir. The recommendation in the Spokane River UAA requires that sources maximize the volume of water in the lower hypolimnion to DO levels above 4.0 mg/L. The extent to which this volume can be maximized depends not only on the feasible control of point and nonpoint loads to the reservoir, but also on potential changes in sediment oxygen demand ( "SOD ") as phosphorus loads decrease. • On- the - ground implementation. The concept of adaptive management as it applies to TMDL implementation allows for on- the -ground implementation to proceed where uncertainty exists about how and when reduction targets will be met. 50489308.02 -11- PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR EN DMENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600, TABLE 60t. _ _.4D WAC 173 -201A -602, TABLE 602 • Continuation of monitoring to ascertain water quality improvements. The Spokane River UAA sponsors have proposed to continue collecting samples and analyzing the results of water quality monitoring methods. • Reservoir aeration. The Spokane River UAA sponsors have conducted an initial investigation of aeration of Long Lake Reservoir. Based on this initial investigation, it appears that reservoir aeration would provide significant benefit to DO levels in the reservoir and downstream water quality. In addition, very preliminary estimates of potential costs associated with reservoir aeration suggest that it appears to be a feasible technology. Therefore, the Spokane River UAA sponsors believe that reservoir aeration should be further investigated. • Work with Avista. The Spokane River UAA sponsors propose to work with Avista to incorporate Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ( "FERC ") considerations and concerns and to implement a comprehensive workable solution. Downstream Surface Water Quality: Currently, the State and Spokane Tribe surface water quality standards for temperature and DO are not consistently being met downstream of Long Lake Reservoir (see Section 3.4 of Part 2 of the Spokane River UAA). It is important to note here that reservoir modeling by both Ecology and Limno -Tech, Inc. ( "LTI ") has shown that Ecology's Draft TMDL (2004e) would not meet Ecology's or the Spokane Tribe's downstream DO surface water quality standards. Amending Washington's surface water quality standards to designate uses and criteria for Long Lake Reservoir consistent with the criteria recommended in this Spokane River UAA would not exacerbate those downstream problems. Modeling by LTI indicates that the next level of treatment combined with reasonable control of nonpoint sources (Scenario 3, the next level of treatment plus 25 percent reduction in nonpoint source loads through implementation of best management practices [NLoT +25 percent NPS BMPs] scenario) should increase DO levels in the vicinity of the Long Lake Reservoir. This improvement represents the highest attainable conditions based on feasible control of pollutant sources. If other direct improvements in Long Lake Reservoir DO levels were implemented (for example, aeration), it is likely that downstream criteria would be met. As noted above, the Spokane River UAA sponsors have conducted an initial investigation of reservoir aeration. This investigation has shown that aeration appears to be feasible and should be further evaluated. Economic Assessment (Part 4) An economic assessment was completed related to treatment alternatives proposed by the implementation plan contained in Ecology's Draft TMDL (2004e) and treatment alternatives recommended in the Implementation Plan of the Spokane River UAA (Part 3). Using order -of- magnitude cost estimates, this assessment is an initial deteimination of the affordability of three treatment alternatives. Costs are presented in this assessment only for upgrades to the City of Spokane ( "City ") plant and for the costs to build the new Spokane County ( "County ") regional treatment plant. References to total phosphorus ( "TP ") removed are for all point source discharges to the river. The marginal costs of phosphorus removal and DO improvement for each alternative were assessed. The sensitivity of the City's and the County's residential sewer rates to the capital cost of each alternative was also assessed. Other factors such as unemployment rates, local government financial capacity, and budget strength were also assessed. 50489308.02 -12- PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR & .DMENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600. TABLE 600 A AC 173 -201A -602, TABLE 602 The alternatives evaluated were: • Implementation of final filtration for point source phosphorus reduction to achieve a 95 percent reduction in total point source loading to the Spokane River • Land application of municipal wastewater in an agricultural operation. • Implementation of reverse osmosis (RO) technology to achieve 99 percent reduction in municipal phosphorus loads. The capital costs are shown in the following table: City of Spokane Spokane County Final Land Reverse Final Land Reverse Costs Filtration' Application Osmosis Filtration Application Osmosis Capital $57.0 million $404.7 million $558.7 million $108.1 million $161.6 million $190.9 million Capital costs represent estimated expenditures by the City and County. They are not adjusted for the allocation of costs between the City and County for that portion of the City Reclamation Plant that Spokane County will pay. Footnotes: 1 CH2M HILL, 2004c (Appendix E3 of the Spokane River UAA). 2 CH2M HILL, 2004a (Appendix El of the Spokane River UAA). 3 CH2M HILL, 2004b (Appendix E2 of the Spokane River UM). 4 HDR Engineering, Inc., 2004 (Appendix E4 of the Spokane River UAA). 5 Capital costs provided by Bruce Rawls, Spokane County Utilities Director. These capital costs are for an 8 million gallons per day (MGD) plant and include, for the land application and RO alternatives, costs for a facility plan amendment and an environmental assessment. Household Cost Impact: The first level of measurement analyzed a household's ability to pay. This is measured by the annual household's sewer cost as a percentage of median household income (MHI) and is referred to as the residential indicator. Other measures included an examination of unemployment rates, poverty levels, and the financial capacity of the City and the County. Residential indicators were calculated for the City and the County for each of the treatment alternatives. Under EPA guidelines, a residential indicator of • Less than 1.0 percent of MHI is considered a low financial impact • Between 1.0 and 2.0 percent of MHI is considered a mid -range financial impact • Greater than 2.0 percent of MHI is considered a high financial impact Ecology, by comparison, defines financial hardship as when the financial indicator for an individual community is greater than 1.5 percent of MHI (Ecology, 2004i). Currently, the City and the County have residential indicators of 0.8 percent and 1.8 percent, respectively. At their current levels, the existing sewer rates for the City are considered within the affordable range. Under Ecology's guideline (2004i), the County would currently meet the criterion for financial hardship based on its residential indicator. 50489308.02 -13- PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR i ENDMENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600, TABLE 601, . .D WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Implementation of the alternatives results in the following household cost impact based on the residential indictor: Annual Average Sewer Bill as a Percent of MHI (Residential Indicator) after Implementabon of Proposed Alternatives 3 4% 32% 3.0% 2.8% 2.6% ---- 2.4% — - 22% 2.0% -- 1.8% 1 6% 1 4% 0.4% 02% 0.0% 20% 2 0.8% 50489308.02 - 14 - 1.36 2.4% 31S 1.0% Spokane Courirt. Spokane County- Spokane County- Spokane County- City of Spokane- Oty of Spokane- ON of Spokane - Qty of Spokane- Average- Current Current Rtrabor Land App RO Garrett Fitratiar. Land App tom' The City's residential indicator increases from 0.8 percent under current conditions to 2.4 percent under the land application alternative and 3.1 percent under the RO alternative. The County's residential indicator increases from 1.8 percent under current conditions to 2.0 percent under the land application alternative and 2.4 percent under the RO alternative. In other words, based on the residential indicator, neither the City nor the County can affordably implement either the land application alternative or the RO alternative. Further refinement of this assessment would not appear to produce any different outcomes. Efficiency of the Treatment Alternatives: The economic assessment evaluated the efficiency of the alternatives based on the cost of removing additional amounts of phosphorus for each treatment alternative. Filtration is expected to remove approximately 95 percent of the TP at a capital cost of $165 million. Land application and RO would have capital costs of $566 million and $750 million, respectively, and would remove 99 percent of TP from the Spokane River. The following graph illustrates the decreasing efficiency in reducing TP beyond the 95 percent removal level. PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR A. DM ENT TO WAC 173 -201A -600, TABLE 600 A 'AC 173 -201 A -602, TABLE 602 Percent of Total Phosphorous Removed from the Spokane River over Baseline Conditions — $900 $800 a, $700 N S600 ca S500 N $400 $300 U S200 - To N $100 $0 Percent of TP Removed (kg) over Baseline 50489308.02 -15- Land Application Filtration RO • 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Note: The capital cost of the land application altemative could range from $566 million to $688 million, depending on whether leaching of salts would be permitted. This assessment has used the lower range of these estimates to demonstrate the impact of these capital costs on sewer rates and median household income. A similar assessment was performed for increasing levels of DO achieved for each treatment alternative. The percent improvement of DO over baseline for each alternative was evaluated. The capital cost for each alternative was included to indicate the efficiency of each alternative. For example, the metalimnion zone in Long Lake Reservoir experienced improved levels of DO under the filtration and land application/R0 alternatives of 1 percent and 4 percent, respectively. ( , PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR EN DMENT TO W AC 173 -201 A -600. TABLE 60t. ..D WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Percent Improvement of Dissolved Oxygen over Baseline by Alternative $900 $800 C $700 E 5600 w - • $500 y 0 $400 = • $300 to $200 $100 $0 50489308.02 -16- t Metahmnion Upper Hypolimnion me— Lower Hypolimmon Percent Improvement of DO Over Note: The capital cost of the land application altemative could range from $566 to $688 million, depending on whether leaching of salts would be permitted. This assessment has used the lower range of these estimates to demonstrate the impact of these capital costs on sewer rates and median household income. The assessment of DO improvements shows that point source reductions beyond 95 percent removal of TP do not significantly increase DO levels in the reservoir. Nonpoint, internal recirculation, and natural sources of TP are the dominating factors related to existing DO levels. Even if 100 percent of TP removal was achieved via any of the proposed alternatives, the DO levels in the reservoir would still not meet the Washington surface water quality standard of 8.0 mg/L proposed by Ecology (2004e). In addition, neither the land application alternative nor the RO alternative would significantly improve the DO levels beyond filtration technologies. It would be an inefficient use of public resources to require the City and the County to spend the additional hundreds of millions of dollars to implement land application or RO facilities while not achieving significant marginal benefits over the least -cost alternative. In addition, land application of effluent would likely cause a decrease in summer river flows and could potentially reduce the DO levels in the reservoir. Economic Assessment Conclusions: The following conclusions can be derived from the economic assessment: • The final filtration, land application, and RO alternatives achieve nearly the same results in DO improvement in Long Lake Reservoir, indicating that other sources (including nonpoint and natural sources) are significant contributors to current levels of DO. • The land application and RO alternatives cost considerably more than the final filtration alternative and place a high financial burden on the ratepayers of the City, the County, and other dischargers, exceeding accepted measures of affordability. • The land application alternative is not significantly more effective in mitigating DO, yet it is far more expensive than final filtration. Osmosis Reverse Osmosis ' Land Application Land Application 1 il Filtration Filtration I 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 65 90 95 10 ( , PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR EN DMENT TO W AC 173 -201 A -600. TABLE 60t. ..D WAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 Percent Improvement of Dissolved Oxygen over Baseline by Alternative $900 $800 C $700 E 5600 w - • $500 y 0 $400 = • $300 to $200 $100 $0 50489308.02 -16- t Metahmnion Upper Hypolimnion me— Lower Hypolimmon Percent Improvement of DO Over Note: The capital cost of the land application altemative could range from $566 to $688 million, depending on whether leaching of salts would be permitted. This assessment has used the lower range of these estimates to demonstrate the impact of these capital costs on sewer rates and median household income. The assessment of DO improvements shows that point source reductions beyond 95 percent removal of TP do not significantly increase DO levels in the reservoir. Nonpoint, internal recirculation, and natural sources of TP are the dominating factors related to existing DO levels. Even if 100 percent of TP removal was achieved via any of the proposed alternatives, the DO levels in the reservoir would still not meet the Washington surface water quality standard of 8.0 mg/L proposed by Ecology (2004e). In addition, neither the land application alternative nor the RO alternative would significantly improve the DO levels beyond filtration technologies. It would be an inefficient use of public resources to require the City and the County to spend the additional hundreds of millions of dollars to implement land application or RO facilities while not achieving significant marginal benefits over the least -cost alternative. In addition, land application of effluent would likely cause a decrease in summer river flows and could potentially reduce the DO levels in the reservoir. Economic Assessment Conclusions: The following conclusions can be derived from the economic assessment: • The final filtration, land application, and RO alternatives achieve nearly the same results in DO improvement in Long Lake Reservoir, indicating that other sources (including nonpoint and natural sources) are significant contributors to current levels of DO. • The land application and RO alternatives cost considerably more than the final filtration alternative and place a high financial burden on the ratepayers of the City, the County, and other dischargers, exceeding accepted measures of affordability. • The land application alternative is not significantly more effective in mitigating DO, yet it is far more expensive than final filtration. PROPOSED LANGUAGE FOR A. DMENT TO WAC 173 -201 A -600, TABLE 600 SVAC 173-201A-602, TABLE 602 • Implementing either the land application alternative or the RO alternative would not be an effective or efficient use of resources. Conclusion The Spokane River UAA report demonstrates that establishing subcategories of uses and criteria specific to the Spokane River, which are protective of existing and attainable uses, can be achieved with the next level of treatment and reasonable levels of nonpoint source control. Therefore, the Spokane River uses subcategories and criteria associated with those uses should be designated through amendment of Washington's surface water quality standard set forth at WAC 173 -201A -600, Table 600 and WAC 173-201A-602, Table 602. The Spokane River UAA implementation plan is an affordable plan and achieves appropriate levels of protection of existing and affordable uses, even under the severe 2001 low -flow conditions. The plan provides for the improvement of water quality downstream. Initial investigations of aeration in the reservoir suggest that aeration, when used in conjunction with filtration, could provide significant benefits to the DO levels in the reservoir and should be investigated further. The current rule (WAC 173-201A-600, Table 600 and WAC 173 -201 A -602, Table 602) does not do what it was intended to do because it does not protect actual existing or attainable uses. As set forth in the Spokane River UAA report, without the amendment to the rule, the City and the County will be forced to incur economic hardship complying with the TMDL, which is based on a surface water quality standard that protects uses that are neither existing nor attainable. 50489308.02 -17- 1