The URL can be used to link to this page

2014, 12-02 Study SessionAGENDA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET STUDY SESSION Tuesday, December 2, 2014 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: ACTION ITEMS: 1. John Hohman 2. John Hohman, Cary Drainage Easement Agreement, Ridgemont Motion Consideration Area [public comment] Purchase of Real Property Motion Consideration Driskell [public comment] NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Luis Garcia, Countywide Hazard Mitigation Plan Discussion/Information Doug Powell 4. Micki Harnois Beekeeping Discussion/Information 5. Karen Kendall Street Vacation Process Discussion/Information 6. John Hohman Old Mission Right-of-way Vacation Discussion/Information 7. Mayor Grafos Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 8. Information Only (will not be reported or discussed): (a) Department Monthly Reports (b) Argonne Road Project 9. Mayor Grafos 10. Mike Jackson ADJOURN Study Session Agenda, December 2, 2014 Council Comments Discussion/Information City Manager Comments Discussion/Information CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Ridgemont Stormwater Drainage Easement Agreement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: The initial development of the Ridgemont area began over forty years ago by the Renz and Tupper families. The area is generally bounded by 16th Avenue on the north, 24th Avenue on the south, Sullivan Road on the west, and Steen Road on the east. As part of this development, an approximately 11 acre parcel was provided by the developers to accommodate stormwater drainage in the area. Parcel 45225.9101 shown on the attachment has been in operation for over 30 years. Two agreements and one Letter of Commitment govern the use and maintenance of the parcel. Many of the provisions of these documents have long since been fulfilled or have found to be in error. All documents were executed well before the City incorporated. The owners now wish to update the terms of the agreement and to extinguish the previous documents. As noted in the agreement, the owners will continue to be responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the parcel. A copy of the draft proposed agreement is attached. Staff reviewed this issue with Council at the November 17, 2014 Special Council meeting. OPTIONS: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Agreement; or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the Drainage Easement Agreement between the City of Spokane Valley, and Kenneth and Sharon Tupper, and Hilda Renz. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: Draft Agreement; Parcel Exhibit „....., ...... Tupper Drain 45244.0808 45252:5113 ”' 45252.5114 t 45252.3605 45252.3604 45252.3206 45252.3205 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY CLERK 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Document: Drainage Easement Agreement Reference No: 9410050526; 7512120290; 7410180104 Grantor: Kenneth and Sharon Tupper and Hilda E. Renz City of Spokane Valley Grantee: City of Spokane Valley Kenneth and Sharon Tupper and Hilda E Renz Abbreviated Legal Description: Ptn. Of N1/2 Sec. 25, T. 25 N., R. 44 EWM Complete Legal Description on Page 6 Tax Parcel Number(s): 45255.9101 Drainage Easement Agreement This Agreement is made and entered into by and between Kenneth J. Tupper and Sharon L. Tupper, husband and wife, and Hilda E. Renz, an unmarried woman, as the members of R&T, Inc., a dissolved corporation, as to a portion, and Hilda E. Renz, an unmarried woman, as to the remainder, (hereinafter collectively referred to as Tupper/Renz), and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington (hereinafter City). Recitals 1. In September, 1994, R&T, Inc. and Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz entered into a "Modified Easement Agreement" with Spokane County, recorded under Spokane County Auditor's number 9410050526 (hereinafter County Agreement). 2. The purpose of the County Agreement was to provide for a drainage easement and storm water detention area for various additions of the Ridgemont development and to provide for maintenance and operation thereof. 3. Tupper/Renz is the successor in interest to R&T, Inc. and to Alfons B Renz, deceased, and Hilda E. Renz, (hereinafter referred to collectively as Renz). Drainage Easement Agreement Page 1 of 7 4. Spokane County's successor in interest is the City of Spokane Valley by virtue of its incorporation on March 31, 2003. 5. The County Agreement contains several errors, including erroneous legal descriptions, and has largely been ignored by the County and City and Tupper/Renz and Tupper/Renz's predecessors over the past 20 years. 6. Although the County Agreement erroneously places the responsibility for operation and maintenance of the large drainage easement on Ridgemont Estates North 3r and 4th Addition Homeowners Association (hereinafter HOA), the practice has been for Tupper/Renz and its predecessors to maintain the drainage area located in an approximately 12 acre parcel described in Exhibit A, attached hereto. The parcel described in Exhibit A is owned in fee title by Tupper/Renz and is not located in the boundaries of the HOA. The HOA is not a party to the County Agreement. 7. The HOA has responsibility for the operation and maintenance of small drainage swales located within the boundaries of the HOA, which are owned in fee title by the HOA as common property. These small drainage swales are not part of this Agreement. 8. Tupper/Renz and the City wish to extinguish the previous County Agreement and adopt this Agreement to accurately determine the responsibilities of the City and Tupper/Renz relative to the Exhibit A easement property and to provide for operation and maintenance of the storm water and drainage runoff easement. 9. In 1974, Renz and Spokane County entered into an Indemnity Agreement recorded under Auditor's number 7512120290 whereby Renz agreed to indemnify Spokane County for any loss, damage, claims, etc. arising from the drainage control system, including the drainage easement area described in Exhibit A in the Ridgemont development. This indemnity agreement was entered into before construction of the drainage control system at the time of the initial development of the Ridgemont subdivision. 10. The drainage easement area described in Exhibit A has been in operation for over 30 years and operates as designed, without operational problems. Tupper/Renz and the City wish to extinguish the Indemnity Agreement since there is no longer any legitimate purpose for the Indemnity Agreement and the parties wish to replace it with the indemnity provision of this Agreement. 11. In 1974, Renz entered into a "Letter of Commitment" with Spokane County, recorded under Auditor's number 7410180104, whereby Renz agreed not to create lots along 16th Avenue without submitting a plat—it being possible at that time to "segregate" land having frontage on a County road into parcels without submitting a plat. The City's current regulations prohibit the subdivision of land without approval of a plat by the City. As such, the Letter of Commitment is superfluous and of no effect. Tupper/Renz and the City wish to extinguish the Letter of Commitment. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained herein the parties hereto agree as follows: A. Tupper/Renz shall continue to own the fee interest in the property described in Exhibit A. Tupper/Renz hereby grants to the City a perpetual, non-exclusive easement on the property described as the easement area in Exhibit A for use as a storm water and drainage runoff area for the area it presently serves. Drainage Easement Agreement Page 2 of 7 B. Tupper/Renz shall continue to maintain the storm water and drainage runoff area on the Exhibit A easement property as it has done in the past. C. Tupper/Renz shall indemnify the City for all damages caused by the failure of Tupper/Renz to properly operate and maintain the storm water and drainage runoff easement. Tupper/Renz shall be under no obligation to treat or specially process any water or to maintain any area other than the easement area described in Exhibit A. Tupper/Renz shall not be required to perform any duties in the maintenance of the easement that it has not done in the past. D. Tupper/Renz shall timely pay and keep current all taxes and assessments levied against the Exhibit A property and shall keep such property free of any liens adverse to the storm water and drainage easement. E. Tupper/Renz shall have the right to sell its interest in and/or grant an easement to Vera Water and Power to access and use the property described in Exhibit A, but the terms and conditions herein shall run with the land, and be binding on any successors and assigns. F. The 1994 County Agreement referred to above is hereby extinguished and of no further effect. G. The 1974 Indemnity Agreement referred to above is hereby extinguished and of no further effect. H. The 1974 Letter of Commitment referred to above is hereby extinguished and of no further effect. I. This Agreement is freely assignable by either of the parties hereto, but the terms and conditions herein shall run with the land, and be binding on any successors and assigns. J. This Agreement is the complete and total agreement of the parties and may not be modified except by a writing executed by the parties or their successors. Drainage Easement Agreement Page 3 of 7 Dated this day of , 2014. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY By: Mike Jackson, City Manager Kenneth J. Tupper Sharon L. Tupper Hilda E. Renz by her Attorney -in -Fact, Sharon K. Queen STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that , signed this instrument, on oath stated the he was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledge it as the of CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON, to be the free and voluntary act of such CITY for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this day of , 2014. Print Name: Notary Public in and for the State of Washington, residing at: My appointment expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of ) On this day personally appeared before me Kenneth J. Tupper to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. DATED: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: Drainage Easement Agreement Page 4 of 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of ) On this day personally appeared before me Sharon L. Tupper to me known to be the individual described in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as her free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. DATED: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. County of ) On this day personally appeared before me Sharon K. Queen to me known to be the Attorney -in -Fact for Hilda E. Renz and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that she signed the same as the free and voluntary act and deed of said Hilda, E. Renz, for the uses and purposes herein mentioned and on oath stated that she was authorized to execute the said instrument. DATED: NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of Washington, residing at My commission expires: Drainage Easement Agreement Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT A Entire Parcel That portion of the North Half of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, lying northerly, northwesterly and easterly of Ridgemont Estates No. 2, Recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, Page 85, Ridgemont Estates, Recorded in Volume 12 of Plats, Page 36, Ridgemont Estates North 3rd Addition, Recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, Page 72, Ridgemont Estates North 4th Addition, Recorded in Volume 22 of Plats, Page 73 and Ridgemont Estates North 9th Addition, Recorded in Volume 26 of Plats, Page 29; And Lying Southwesterly of the Following Described Line: Beginning at northerly corner of Lot 8 Block 1 of Ridgemont Estates No. 2; thence North 50°22'27" West 159.13 feet; thence North 30°08'14" West 152.25 feet to the Northerly Line of said section and terminus of this line described; Except road; Situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, State of Washington. Drainage Easement A portion of the Northeast quarter of the Northwest quarter and the Northwest quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., being more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point that is South 89°16'42" East, a distance of 626.35 feet from the North quarter corner of said Section 25, said point being common to the North boundary of said Section 25 and the West boundary of Leo N. Cashatt and others, as established by a survey performed by Adams Engineering in 1976; thence along said Cashatt West boundary, the following two (2) courses, South 30°08'12" East, a distance of 152.25 feet; thence South 50°22'25" East, a distance of 26.00 feet; thence South 52°30'00" West a distance of 135.07 feet; thence South 30°22'00" East, a distance of 119.42 feet; thence South 56°26'16" West, a distance of 40.06 feet; thence North 30°22'00" West, a distance of 116.74 feet; thence South 52°38'00" West, a distance of 307.71 feet; thence South 50°22'00" East, a distance of 151.82 feet; thence South 39°26'16" West, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 50°22'00" West, a distance of 161.19 feet; thence South 45°39'33" West, a distance of 349.84 feet; thence South 50°33'44" East, a distance of 199.11 feet; thence South 39°26'16" West, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence North 50°33'44" West, a distance of 203.47 feet; thence South 45°39'33" West, a distance of 84.90 feet; thence South 76°35'00" West, a distance of 144.00 feet; thence South 07°35'00" West, a distance of 89.92 feet to the East line of the Future Plat of Ridgemont Estates North 3rd Addition; thence North 02°51'52" West, along said East Drainage Easement Agreement Page 6 of 7 line, a distance of 215.89 feet to a point on a nontangent curve concave to the West with a radius of 50.00 feet and a radial bearing of South 44°22'04" East, said point being on the Easterly line of the Future Plat of Ridgemont Estates North 4th, the next 2 courses along said Easterly line; thence Northeasterly, Northerly and Northwesterly through a central angle of 119°08'01", an arc distance of 103.96 feet; thence North 16°29'55" East, radial to said curve, a distance of 28.10 feet; thence North 56°18'15" East, a distance of 248.44 feet; thence North 32°00'54" East, a distance of 244.68 feet; thence North 76°30'08" East, a distance of 154.57 feet; thence North 54°00'44" East, a distance of 186.55 feet; thence North 62°14'59" East, a distance of 149.00 feet; thence North 26°59'32" East, a distance of 29.57 feet to the South right of way (R/VV) of 16th Avenue and a point on a curve concave to the Northwest with a radius of 495.72 feet and a radial bearing of South 16°02'48" East, thence Northeasterly along said South R/W, through a central angle of 3°15'02", an arc distance of 28.12 feet; thence South 89°09'28" East, 25.38 feet to the Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. Drainage Easement Agreement Page 7 of 7 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: purchase of real property at Sprague and Dartmouth from Dartmouth, LLC, for a future City Hall. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Discussion at winter workshop February 18, 2014; discussion at budget workshop June 17, 2014. BACKGROUND: The City has discussed for a number of years whether to construct a City Hall owned by the City, rather than leasing as it has for nearly 12 years. Staff has identified a centrally -located site at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Dartmouth Road that would fit the City's criteria. The site would be 3.38 acres of what is currently parking lot, for a purchase price of $1,126,759.24, ($7.65 per square foot) plus standard closing costs. As part of the purchase, the City would do a boundary line adjustment to create the lot out of the existing parcels. A draft conceptual site diagram is provided for visual context. It is not intended to, and does not signify that the City has determined a location on the site or other design issues. OPTIONS: (1) approve the acquisition, or (2) do not approve the acquisition. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve the acquisition of 3.38 acres of real property at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Dartmouth Road from Dartmouth, LLC, and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute any documents necessary to accomplish that acquisition. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $1,126,759.24 plus closing and transaction costs. This will require an amendment to the 2015 budget. The cost of the property is anticipated to be covered by reserves from Civic Facilities Capital Projects Fund #310 and Capital Reserve Fund #312. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community and Economic Development Director; Cary Driskell, City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: (1) Proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Spokane Valley and Dartmouth, LLC (2) Draft conceptual site diagram AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY is made as of the day of Decemberr, 2014 (the "Execution Date") between DARTMOUTH, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company (the "Seller") and the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, a Washington municipal corporation (the "Purchaser"), collectively referred to as "Parties." THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PURCHASE AND SALE. Subject to and upon all of the terms, conditions and provisions of this Agreement, Seller agrees to sell to Purchaser, and Purchaser agrees to purchase from Seller, the real property located on the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Dartmouth Road in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, Washington, totaling approximately 3.38 acres or 147,288.79 square feet legally described on Exhibit "A" and as depicted on Exhibit "B", together with all easements or appurtenances, and all improvements, if any, located in or on said real property (collectively, the "Property"). 2. PURCHASE PRICE. The purchase price for the Property shall be One Million One Hundred Twenty Six Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty Nine and 24/100 U.S. Dollars ($1,126,759.24) ("Purchase Price"). A. The Parties acknowledge that the Purchase Price is based upon a purchase price of Seven and 65/100 Dollars ($7.65) per square foot and the Seller conveying to Purchaser 147,288.79 square feet. B. Within five (5) days of the Execution Date, Seller shall open escrow with First American Title Insurance Company located at 40 East Spokane Falls Boulevard, Spokane, Washington ("Title Company"). "Opening of Escrow" shall be deemed to have occurred when the Title Company shall have received a fully executed original, or counterpart originals, or a fully executed true and correct copy of this Agreement. 3. PURCHASER'S RIGHT TO ENTER PROPERTY PRIOR TO CLOSING. Purchaser and its employees and agents shall have the right and permission from the date of this Agreement through the Closing Date (or earlier termination of this Agreement) to enter upon the Property or any part thereof at all reasonable times and from time to time for the purpose, at Purchaser's sole cost and expense, of conducting an investigation of the Property. Purchaser shall indemnify and hold harmless the Seller from and against any liens or claims and the like that may be filed or asserted against the Property or Seller by any actions taken by Purchaser in connection with its investigation of the Property. 4. CONTINGENCIES. The obligations of Seller and Purchaser under this Agreement are contingent upon the following: A. Title Review. Seller shall within five (5) days of the Opening of Escrow, at its sole cost and expense, provide to Purchaser a preliminary commitment for an Owner's Standard Policy of title insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price on the Property from the Title AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 1of15 Company, and shall deliver a copy thereof together with copies of all documents referred to therein, to Purchaser. Purchaser, at its sole cost and expense, shall review the report and documents, and on or before twenty (20) days after receipt of said report and documents Purchaser shall notify Seller in writing of any objectionable exceptions to title contained in said report. If no such written notice of objectionable exceptions to title is given within twenty (20) days of receipt of the title report by Purchaser, it shall be conclusively presumed that Purchaser approves of the title to the Property. In the event Seller shall receive timely notice of any objection of Purchaser to the title, Seller shall have ten (10) days of receipt of written notice to attempt to eliminate any such objectionable title exceptions, except for monetary encumbrances which may be eliminated at Closing. If Seller is unable or unwilling to eliminate any such objectionable title exceptions, or if Seller fails to respond to Purchaser's notice of objection(s), within such ten (10) day period, Purchaser shall have the option to either i) waive such objections, or ii) elect to terminate the Agreement. In the event of such termination, this Agreement shall be without any further force and effect, and Purchaser shall be refunded the Deposit together with any interest accrued thereon. If any new title matters are disclosed in a supplemental title report, then the preceding objection, waiver and termination provisions shall apply to the new title matters except that Purchaser's notice of objections must be delivered within five (5) days of delivery of the supplemental report. Notwithstanding anything above regarding Purchaser's review of title matters, on or before Closing, Seller will eliminate any monetary liens or encumbrances covering the Property and cause all property taxes, assessments, and similar items to be paid current. Any title exception items for which Purchaser has not provided an objection or which Purchaser has waived as provided above in this Section shall not constitute defects or encumbrances on title conveyed by Seller and are deemed "Permitted Encumbrances." B. Delivery of Property Information. Within five (5) days following the Opening of Escrow (as defined below), Seller shall provide to Purchaser, or make available to Purchaser, copies of books and records which may be in Seller's possession relating to the condition and use of Property (the "Property Information"). The foregoing obligation of Seller to provide Property Information is furnished to Purchaser solely as a courtesy, and that Seller has neither verified the accuracy of any statements or other information therein contained nor the qualifications of the persons preparing such information. Seller does not warrant the accuracy of any information contained therein in any way. Seller makes no warranty or representation of any kind as to the accuracy, or any other matter in connection with the provision of Property Information to Purchaser. Seller is providing, to the best of its knowledge, all relevant property information to Seller. Purchaser shall have ten (10) days following receipt of the Property Information to provide Seller with notice of Purchaser's disapproval ("Notice of Disapproval") of the transaction based on Purchaser's evaluation, and Purchaser's discretion, of the Property Information. In the event Seller has not received a Notice of Disapproval of the Property Information within that time, Purchaser shall be deemed to have approved this contingency. C. Boundary Line Adjustment. Purchaser, at its sole cost and expense, shall take all actions reasonable and appropriate to cause the Property to be created as a legal separate tax parcel capable of being separately conveyed as contemplated in this Agreement of a size and configuration identified under Section 1 (the "Boundary Line Adjustment"). The Parties contemplate that Purchaser will accomplish the requirements in this Section through approval of AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 2 of 15 a boundary line adjustment covering the Property and the additional real property owned and operated by Seller commonly identified as Spokane County Assessor's tax parcel numbers 45201.0116 and 45201.0115. Seller, as the owner of the Property, agrees to provide any appropriate authorizations reasonably necessary to accomplish the Boundary Line Adjustment. The Boundary Line Adjustment is anticipated to be completed and recorded no later than December 15, 2014. D. Demolition of Adjacent Structures. University City, Inc., a Washington corporation ("Adjacent Owner"), is the owner of Spokane County tax parcel number 45201.0119 ("Adjacent Parcel"). The Parties recognize that a parking structure, parking ramp, and related facilities exist that straddle a part of the Property and Adjacent Parcel as generally depicted on Exhibit "C" (the "Parking Facilities"). Seller shall obtain the written agreement of the Adjacent Owner to remove the Parking Facilities at their sole cost and expense, which shall be completed not later than August 1, 2015, substantively in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "D" ("Parking Facilities Demolition Letter"), and Seller shall likewise remove any such Parking Facilities located on the Property no later than August 1, 2015. Purchaser shall be a beneficiary under the Parking Facilities Demolition Letter. 5. CLOSING. A. Closing; Prorations. The purchase and sale hereunder shall be closed in the office of the Title Company (the "Closing"), on the Closing Date. The purchase and sale hereunder shall be closed no earlier than January 2, 2015, and no later than January 30, 2015 (the "Closing Date"). This Agreement is intended to constitute escrow instructions to Title Company. At Closing, Seller shall pay (i) all title insurance premiums for an Owner's Standard Policy of Title Insurance in the amount of the Purchase Price issued by the Title Company for the Property; (ii) one-half of the Closing escrow fees; (iii) all excise or other conveyance taxes on the conveyance of the Property; (iv) real property taxes on the Property prorated through the Closing Date; (v) any recording fees; (vi) all charges necessary for clearing monetary encumbrances from the Property; and (vii) utilities due as of the Closing Date. At Closing, Purchaser shall pay (i) all title insurance premiums for any endorsement of the policy of title insurance requested by the Purchaser; and (ii) one-half of the Closing escrow fees. Any other Closing charges not provided for herein shall be paid as in the usual and customary practice of the county in which the Property is located. Seller and Purchaser shall each pay their respective attorneys' fees. B. Seller Closing Documents. At Closing, Seller shall execute and deliver all documents necessary to effect and complete the Closing, including, but not limited to, the following documents: (1) A Statutory Warranty Deed (the "Deed") conveying fee simple title to the Property, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions; (2) The issuance of an Owner's Standard Policy of Title Insurance, issued by Title Company insuring Purchaser's title to the Property in the amount of the Purchase Price and containing no exceptions other than Permitted Encumbrances; AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 3 of 15 (3) The Boundary Line Adjustment; (4) An executed Parking Facilities Demolition Letter; (5) An executed Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit; (6) Seller's FIRPTA Certification; and (7) Such further or additional documents as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to fully carry out the intent and purpose of this Agreement. C. Purchaser Closing Documents. At the Closing, Purchaser shall execute and deliver all documents necessary to effect and complete the Closing, including, but not limited to, the following: (1) The Purchase Price; (2) An executed Parking Facilities Demolition Letter; (3) An executed Real Estate Excise Tax Affidavit; and (4) Such further or additional documents as may be reasonably necessary or appropriate to fully carry out the intent and purpose of this Agreement. D. Status of Title Company/Closing Protection Letter/Tax Reporting/ Cancellation Charges. By accepting this escrow, Title Company agrees to be bound by the terms of this Agreement as they relate to the duties of Title Company. However, such agreement does not constitute Title Company as a party to this Agreement and no consent or approval from Title Company shall be required to amend, extend, supplement, cancel or otherwise modify this Agreement, except to the extent any such action increases the duties of Title Company or exposes Title Company to increased liability, in which case such action shall not be binding on Title Company unless Title Company has consented to the same in writing. If Title Company does not issue its own title insurance policies, but acts as an agent for an underwriter, as a condition to Title Company acting as such, Title Company shall cause its underwriter to issue to the Parties a closing protection letter in written form satisfactory to Seller and Purchaser within five (5) days following the Opening of Escrow. Title Company agrees to be the designated "reporting person" under §6045(e) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the "Code") with respect to the real estate transaction described in this Agreement and to prepare, file and deliver such information, returns and statements as the U.S. Treasury Department may require by regulations or forms in connection with such requirements, including Form 1099-S. If the transaction contemplated by this Agreement fails to close because of Seller's default, Seller shall be liable to Title Company for all customary escrow cancellation charges. If AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 4 of 15 the transaction contemplated by this Agreement fails to close because of Purchaser's default, Purchaser shall be liable to Title Company for all customary escrow cancellation charges. If the escrow fails to close for any other reason, Seller and Purchaser shall each be liable for one-half of all customary escrow cancellation charges. E. Personal Property. Upon and subject to payment of the Purchase Price and conveyance of the Property to Purchaser in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, any personal property shall vest in and belong to Purchaser in "AS IS" condition without further payment, and without any warranty of any kind or nature whatsoever, express or implied, including, without limitation, the absence of any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. F. FIRPTA. Title Company is instructed to prepare a certification that Seller is not a "Foreign Person" within the meaning of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act. Purchaser agrees to sign this certification (the "FIRPTA Certification"). Purchaser represents it is not a "Foreign Person" under Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act. 6. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF SELLER; CONDITION OF PROPERTY. A. Seller Representations. Seller represents that each of the following are true: (i) Seller has full power and authority to enter into and to perform its obligations under this Agreement; and (ii) This Agreement and each of the documents and agreements to be delivered by Seller at the Closing, constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of Seller, enforceable against Seller in accordance with their respective terms, except to the extent that enforceability may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent conveyance, moratorium, or similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights generally, and subject, as to enforceability, to general principles of equity, regardless of whether enforcement is sought in a court of law or equity. B. In addition to the foregoing representations, Seller has provided Purchaser with a Seller Disclosure Statement for Commercial Property ("SDS"). Purchaser acknowledges that Seller has completed the SDS to the best of Seller's actual knowledge without engaging in investigation or inspection of the Property for this purpose. Purchaser understands that, in accordance with RCW Chapter 64.06, Seller will not be liable or any error or inaccuracy or omission in the SDS unless Seller had actual knowledge of the error in accuracy or omission. 7. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF PURCHASER. Purchaser hereby makes the following representations and warranties: A. It acknowledges and agrees that the purchase of the Property is made on an "AS IS," "WHERE IS" and "WITH ALL FAULTS" basis, subject to any patent and latent defects, and, except as expressly made in this Agreement, without any representation or warranty of any kind or nature whatsoever whether expressed or implied, oral or written, past or present, with AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S1049073 .DOC Page 5 of 15 respect to the Property. If Closing occurs, and subject to the specific representations and warranties contained herein, (A) Purchaser shall be deemed to have accepted the Property with and subject to all defects and deficiencies; and (B) Purchaser expressly assumes the risk that subsequent events or undiscovered or unknown conditions could make all or part of the Property unsuitable for Purchaser's intended purpose. B. It is not relying on any representation or warranty made by or on behalf of Seller as to any matter not expressly set forth in this Agreement, including, without limitation, any representation or warranty with respect to the condition of the Property or any improvement thereon, any income generated by or any expense related to the Property, the Property's or any improvement's suitability for any use, conformance of the Property or any improvement to local or state building, earthquake or other requirements, or any other matter. Purchaser further represents that it has made such investigation as Purchaser desires concerning the Property, including but not limited to the condition of title of the Property, the physical condition of the Property and any improvements thereon, the fitness of the Property for Purchaser's intended use and the availability of land use approvals and permits for future development of the Property. C. It has no remedy of any kind or nature whatsoever, legal or equitable, against Seller for the condition of the Property or any improvement and Purchaser specifically assumes the risk of any economic loss it occasions by the purchase of the Property, except as specifically set forth in 4.D, above, and 10.C, below. D. That, after approval by the legislative authority of the Purchaser, it has the full power and legal authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform and carry out all covenants and obligations to be performed and carried out by Purchaser hereunder. E. This Agreement and all other instruments and documents executed or delivered in connection with this transaction each constitute legal, valid and binding obligations of Purchaser, enforceable against Purchaser in accordance with their respective terms. 8. PRE-CLOSING COVENANTS. Beginning on the Opening of Escrow and until the earlier of the Closing or the cancellation of this Agreement, Seller covenants and agrees as follows: (a) Seller shall not commit waste on the Property; and (b) Seller shall not enter into any contracts with respect to the Property that will be binding following the Closing unless otherwise consented to by the Purchaser, in writing. 9. COOPERATION. Purchaser and Seller agree to cooperate in the execution of all documents or instruments as are required by either party to perform the obligations of the Parties hereunder, as long as such cooperation imposes no materially greater or different burden upon such party than is otherwise imposed by the terms of this Agreement. 10. DEFAULT - TERMINATION. A. Purchaser Default. The occurrence of any of the following will constitute a default by Purchaser under this Agreement if, by the time set for the Closing, Purchaser has failed: (a) to deposit into escrow the documents and other items to be deposited by Purchaser in AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 6 of 15 escrow by the time set for Closing; or (b) to perform any other obligation of Purchaser to be performed by the time set for Closing. B. Seller Default. The occurrence of any of the following will constitute a default by Seller under this Agreement if, by the time set for the Closing, Seller has failed: (a) to deposit into escrow with the Title Company the documents and other items to be deposited by Seller in escrow by the time set for Closing; or (b) to perform any other obligation of Seller to be performed by the time set for Closing. C. Purchaser Remedies. In the event this Agreement fails to close due to material default by Seller, Purchaser shall have the right to elect to either (i) terminate this Agreement by written notice delivered to Seller on or before Closing whereupon the Parties hereto shall thereafter have no further liabilities or obligations one to the other; (ii) waive Seller's default and proceed to Closing as provided by this Agreement; or (iii) commence an action for specific performance of the obligations under this agreement. 11. ATTORNEY FEES. Should any party hereto bring any action under this Agreement against any other party hereto, its validity, enforceability, scope or subject matter, the prevailing party or parties shall be awarded its or their reasonable attorney fees and costs incurred for prosecution, defense, consultation or advice in connection with such action. 12. NOTICES. Any notice, consent or approval required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given upon (i) hand delivery, (ii) one (1) business day after being deposited with Federal Express or another reliable overnight courier service, with receipt acknowledgment requested, or (iii) upon receipt or refused delivery deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt required, and addressed as follows: If to Purchaser: Required Copy to: If to Seller: City of Spokane Valley Attn: Mike Jackson, City Manager 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 Telephone: (509) 921-1000 City of Spokane Valley Cary P. Driskell, City Attorney 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 103 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 Telephone: (509) 720-5105 Dartmouth, LLC Attn: H. James Magnuson 1250 W. Northwood Center Court Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 (208) 666-1596 AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 7 of 15 Required Copy to: Daniel E. Finney / Nathan G. Smith Witherspoon • Kelley 422 W. Riverside Avenue, Suite 1100 Spokane, Washington 99201 Telephone: (509) 624-5265 13. SURVIVAL. All warranties, representations and agreements contained herein or arising out of the sale of the Property by Seller to Purchaser shall survive the delivery and recordation of the Deed, the payment and delivery of the Purchase Price, and the Closing for a period of one (1) year after the date of recordation of the Deed. 14. GOVERNING LAW; JURISDICTION; WAIVER OF JURY. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Washington without regard to conflicts -of -laws principles that would require the application of any other law. Each party hereby consents to the exclusive jurisdiction of any court of competent jurisdiction in the County where the Property is located, in any action related to or arising under this Agreement. EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT SUCH PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY LITIGATION DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY, AND AGREES THAT ANY SUCH LITIGATION SHALL BE CONDUCTED BEFORE A JUDGE SITTING WITHOUT A JURY. 15. INTEGRATION; MODIFICATION; WAIVER. This Agreement and the Closing documents prepared pursuant to this Agreement constitute the complete and final expression of the Agreement of the Parties relating to the Property. This Agreement cannot be modified, or any of the terms hereof waived, except by an instrument in writing (referring specifically to this Agreement) executed by the Seller and Purchaser. 16. COUNTERPART AND FACSIMILE EXECUTION. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed to be one agreement. This Agreement may be executed pursuant to original or facsimile copies of signatures, with the same effect as if the Parties had signed the document pursuant to original signature. 17. HEADINGS; CONSTRUCTION. The headings which have been used throughout this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and do not constitute matter to be construed in interpreting this Agreement. Words of any gender used in this Agreement shall be held and construed to include any other gender, and words in the singular number shall be held to include the plural and vice versa, unless the context requires otherwise. The words herein, hereof, hereunder, and other similar compounds of the word here when used in this Agreement shall refer to the entire Agreement and not to any particular provision or section. Seller and Purchaser acknowledge that each party and its counsel have reviewed this Agreement and that the rule of construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement or any document AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 8 of 15 executed and delivered by either party in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 18. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence of this Agreement and of the obligations of the Parties to purchase and sell the Property. 19. INVALID PROVISIONS. If any one or more of the provisions of this Agreement, or the applicability of any such provision to a specific situation, shall be held invalid or unenforceable, such provision shall be modified to the minimum extent necessary to make it or its application valid and enforceable, and the validity and enforceability of all other provisions of this Agreement and all other applications of any such provision shall not be affected hereby. 20. NO ASSIGNMENT. Purchaser may not assign or otherwise transfer any of its rights under this Agreement without the prior written consent of Seller, which will not be unreasonably withheld. No assignment shall release Purchaser from any of its obligations under this Agreement. 21. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of Seller and Purchaser, and their respective successors and permitted assigns. 22. FURTHER ACTS. In addition to the acts recited in this Agreement to be performed by Seller and Purchaser, Seller and Purchaser agree to perform or cause to be performed at Closing or after Closing any and all such further acts as may be reasonably necessary to consummate the transactions contemplated hereby. 23. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION; CONDEMNATION. A. If, prior to conveyance of the Property to Purchaser, the improvements thereon are damaged or destroyed by fire or other casualty, Seller will promptly deliver written notice to Purchaser of such casualty. If the cost to restore the damage or destruction is more than ten percent (10%) of the Purchase Price, (a) either Party may terminate the purchase and sale of the Property by giving written notice to the other within the earlier of twenty (20) days following notice of the occurrence of such damage or the Closing Date; and (b) in any other case, the purchase and sale of the Property shall nevertheless proceed, and upon conveyance of the Property, Seller shall assign and pay over to Purchaser all proceeds of insurance or claims to uncollected insurance proceeds not expended by Seller to repair and restore the damage or destruction or render the Property safe, and any work incomplete at the time of conveyance of the Property to Purchaser shall be completed and paid for by Purchaser unless Purchaser elects at its own risk, cost and expense to discontinue the work (but any proceeds of insurance against loss of income or rental shall be prorated as of date of conveyance of the Property). If either party elects to terminate this Agreement neither party hereto will have any further duties or obligations hereunder. Seller shall give notice to Purchaser reasonably promptly after Seller's receiving notice of damage or destruction of all or any part of the Property. If necessary, the Closing Date shall be postponed until Seller has given any notice to Purchaser required by this Section 23 and the period of twenty (20) days described in this Section 23 has expired. AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 9 of 15 B. If, before the Closing Date, proceedings are commenced for the taking by exercise of the power of eminent domain of all or a material part of the Property which, as reasonably determined by Purchaser, would render the Property unsuitable for Purchaser's intended use, Purchaser shall have the right, by giving notice to Seller within twenty (20) days after Seller gives notice of the commencement of such proceedings to Purchaser, to terminate this Agreement, in which event this Agreement shall terminate. If Purchaser has the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to the preceding sentence but Purchaser does not exercise such right, then this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and, on the Closing Date, the condemnation award (or, if not theretofore received, the right to receive such award) payable on account of the taking shall be transferred to Purchaser. Seller shall give notice to Purchaser reasonably promptly after Seller's receiving notice of the commencement of any proceedings for the taking by exercise of the power of eminent domain of all or any part of the Property. 24. POSSESSION. Purchaser shall be entitled to exclusive possession of the Property upon Closing. 25. WAIVERS. No waiver of any provision of this Agreement or any breach of this Agreement shall be effective unless such waiver is in writing and signed by the waiving party and any such waiver shall not be deemed a waiver of any other provision of this Agreement or any other or subsequent breach of this Agreement. 26. BROKERAGE. The Parties warrant to each other that neither has employed the service of a broker for the purpose of negotiation or execution of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement except as provided below. If any person asserts a claim to a finder's fee, brokerage commission or other compensation on account of alleged employment as a finder or broker or performance of services as a finder or broker in connection with this transaction, the party under whom the finder or broker is claiming shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other party and such party's related parties for, from and against any and all Claims in connection with such claim or any action or proceeding brought on such Claim. As used in this Section, "Claims" means any and all obligations, debts, covenants, conditions, representations, costs, and liabilities and any and all demands, causes of action, and claims, of every type, kind, nature or character, direct or indirect, known or unknown, absolute or contingent, determined or speculative, at law, in equity or otherwise, including attorney fees and litigation and court costs. Seller has engaged the services of Jim Koon of Black Commercial, Inc., and Seller will pay said broker a commission equal to three and one-half percent (3.5%) of the Purchase Price at Closing. [ Signature Page to Follow ] AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 10 of 15 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed the foregoing Agreement effective as of the date appearing above. SELLER: PURCHASER: DARTMOUTH, LLC, an Idaho limited CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, a Washington liability company municipal corporation By: By: Its: Its: City Manager ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 11 of 15 EXHIBIT A Legal Description All that portion of Parcels "E" and "F" of Binding Site Plan BSP -56-97, as recorded in Book 2 of Binding Site Plans, Pages 7 and 8, records of Spokane County, being a portion of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 20, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., more particularly described as follows: The North 280.00 feet of said Parcel "F"; TOGETHER WITH the North 280.00 feet of the West 97.00 feet of said Parcel "E"; Situate in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, State of Washington. Said parcel containing an approximate area of 147,288.79 square feet, or 3.38 acres, more or less. AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 12 of 15 EXHIBIT B Property Depiction AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S1049073 .DOC Page 13 of 15 EXHIBIT C Parking Facilities SOP5; otarK c.ny Printed from m. ,s pokanecounty.org on 09/11/2014 at 11 AM AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 14 of 15 EXHIBIT D Parking Facilities Demolition Letter [Dartmouth, LLC Letterhead] [Date] City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Ave., Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: University City, Inc. and Dartmouth, LLC - Demolition of Parking Facilities Dear Sir or Madam: Reference is made to that certain Agreement to Purchase Commercial Property by and between Dartmouth, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company, as Seller, and City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal corporation, as Purchaser (the "Purchase Agreement"). Pursuant to Section 4.D. of the Purchase Agreement, the undersigned Seller and University City, Inc., a Washington corporation, acknowledge the obligation to demolish the Parking Facilities described in the Purchase Agreement prior to August 1, 2015. Seller and University City, Inc., acknowledge the Purchaser is an intended beneficiary of the obligation to demolish the Parking Facilities under the Purchase Agreement and shall have the right to enforce the obligations described herein, including commencing an action for specific performance. In the event an action is commenced to enforce this Parking Facilities Demolition Letter, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney fees and related court costs. Nothing herein is intended to modify obligations of the Parties to the Purchase Agreement or any agreement between Dartmouth, LLC, and University City, Inc., for the demolition of the Parking Facilities. Dartmouth, LLC, an Idaho limited liability company By: Its: University City, Inc., a Washington corporation By: Its: Acknowledged and Agreed: City of Spokane Valley, a Washington municipal corporation By: Its: AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE COMMERCIAL PROPERTY S 1049073 .DOC Page 15 of 15 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Department of Emergency Management Services; Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 44 Section 201.6 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approved Resolution No. 07-002. Original Hazard Mitigation Plan. BACKGROUND: Compliance with the Disaster Mitigation Act and the Countywide Disaster Mitigation Update will be undertaken by a multi -jurisdictional planning effort. The City of Spokane Valley initially approved the original plan in 2007 under Resolution No. 07-002. The plan required updating every 5 years. The original plan has since expired; the update is required to qualify for federal funding under the Disaster Mitigation Act. OPTIONS: No action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time. A resolution for Council approval consideration is scheduled for December 16, 2014. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Doug Powell, Building Official Luis Garcia, Development Services Coordinator ATTACHMENTS: 1) Power Point Presentation (2) Memorandum to Mayor and Council (3) Hazard Mitigation Plan Chapter 10 Sticikane� Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption City Council Meeting December 2, 2014 Spokane �Valley� Background: Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption The Disaster Mitigation Act DMA 2000 provides the legal basis for FEMA mitigation planning requirements for State, local and Indian Tribal governments as a condition of mitigation grant assistance. "No Plan, No Money" Spokane �Valley Initial Adoption: Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption • Initial Plan adopted by Spokane Valley on March 27, 2007. Resolution No. 07-002 • Plan included Spokane County, City of Spokane, and City of Spokane Valley as the only planning partners. • Requires ongoing monitoring, evaluation, and updating. • Initial Plan expired in 2012. Spokane ...•••115.Valley� Plan Update: Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption Plan Contains over 600 pages in 2 Volumes. • Volume 1- Applies to all Planning Partners • Volume 2- Contains chapters specific to each jurisdiction. • Chapter 10- Spokane Valley Annex Update • Local contact information. • Maps of Critical Facilities, Flood Hazard Areas, etc. • Local Capability Assessment Hazard Mitigation Plan Update ('IIV IX Spokane Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption �Valley Update Highlights: • Expanded by including Special Purpose District planning partners not involved in the initial planning effort. • Recognizing science and technology have improved since the development of the initial plan. • The plan meets program requirements of the federal Community Rating System, thus reducing flood insurance premiums in participating jurisdictions. • The plan identifies actions rather than strategies. Strategies provide direction, but actions are fundable under grant programs. Spokane ....•••115.Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption Goals: • Ensure effective and efficient emergency response and recovery capabilities to reduce the loss of life and property during and after a disaster through mitigation. • Protect property including critical public facilities and infrastructure from possible damage due to hazards. • Protect the continuity of local government to ensure no significant disruption of services during or due to a natural disaster. • Build and support local capacity to enable the whole community to prepare, respond, mitigate and recover from the impact of natural hazards. • Encourage the development and implementation of sustainable, cost-effective and environmentally sound mitigation projects. • Improve communication and information sharing within the community to support the planning for, response to, mitigation of, and recovering from the impacts of disasters. Skkan ...•••115.Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption Objectives: • Sustain continuity of local emergency and government operations, including the operation of identified critical facilities, during and after a disaster. • Reduce natural hazard -related risks to potentially isolated/vulnerable populations within the planning area. • Improve/protect systems that provide warning and emergency communications. • Utilizing the best available data and science, continually share updated information on hazards, risk and ways to reduce risk with all stakeholders within the planning area. • Strengthen codes, land use planning and their enforcement, so that new construction can avoid or withstand the impacts of natural hazards. • Provide/improve flood protection with flood mitigation measures and drainage system maintenance plans. Spokane ....•••115.Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption Objectives Cont.: • Provide/improve fire protection thru proactive fuels management programs. • Assure coordination between participating [jurisdictions] and adjoining communities. • Work to lower emergency service response times, through improvement to transportation facilities. • Retrofit, purchase or relocate structures based on one or more of the following criteria: level of exposure, repetitive loss history, and previous damage from natural hazards. • Seek mitigation projects that minimize environmental impacts, improve the environment's ability to absorb the impact of natural disasters, or seek ways to mitigate their impacts on the environment. • Encourage mitigation of private property through programs such as the Community Rating System, Firewise and Storm Ready programs. Spokane �Ual ley Guiding Principle: Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption Utilizing community partnerships and planning, reduce the vulnerability to natural hazards in order to protect the health, safety, welfare, environment and economy of the greater Spokane area within Spokane County. S4$�Ii� Valley Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption COMMENTS / QUESTIONS Spokane Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption g p Valley THANK YOU! Contacts: Doug Powell, Building Official Luis Garcia, Development Services Coordinator Resources: http://www.spokanecounty.oreemergencymgmt/contentaspx?c=2863 ,pT 1 ane .000Valle 11703 E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 ♦509.720.5240 • Fax: 509.688.0037 • Memorandum Date: December 2, 2014 To: Mayor and Council Cc: City Manager Mike Jackson; Community Development Director John Hohman; and Building Official Doug Powell From: Luis Garcia, Development Services Coordinator Re: Hazard Mitigation Plan Re -Adoption Background: The Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) is a federal legislation requiring governmental organizations to utilize long- and short-term strategies, thereby establishing pre -disaster planning in the form of a Hazard Mitigation Plan. This federal mandate is a pre -requisite to qualify for funding under the Robert T. Stafford Act should an event occur. In response to this federal act, a coalition of local jurisdictions initially adopted the local Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2007. The coalition included Spokane Valley, City of Spokane, and Spokane County. Under the DMA, the plan is required to have on-going monitoring, evaluating and updating to meet the evolving needs of the greater Spokane area. The initial Hazard Mitigation Plan officially expired in 2012, leaving the plan in need of re -adoption to continue to qualify for potential funding. Update: In January of 2013, a steering committee of fifteen stakeholders was established under the direction of the Spokane County Department of Emergency Management. From there, multiple public meetings were held to shape the update while fostering public input. Six Goals and twelve objectives were identified under the following guiding principle: Utilizing community partnerships and planning, reduce the vulnerability to natural hazards in order to protect the health, safety, welfare, environment and economy of the greater Spokane area within Spokane County. Major updates to the plan include the expansion from just the original three participating jurisdictions from the initial 2007 plan. In the update, this was expanded to the twelve partnerships below: • Spokane County • Latah • Cheney • Rockford • Airway Heights • Deer Park • Millwood • Spokane • Liberty Lake • Spokane Valley • Medical Lake • Newman Lake Flood Control Zone District The plan update utilizes the latest technology and data to establish a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to mitigation planning, ensuring preparedness during an emergency event. Re -Adoption: The Hazard Mitigation Plan, as created by the Disaster Mitigation Act, is intended to be a living document. The effective life of the document is five years, with re -adoption required for continued support from the federal government. Spokane County's Depaitinent of Emergency Management has taken the lead on this process with partners contributing services and expertise in kind. Participating in this process has saved the City of Spokane Valley the burden and expense of creating such a plan alone. In order for the City of Spokane Valley to benefit from the plan and qualify for potential grant funding and emergency assistance, the City of Spokane Valley must adopt the Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan by resolution. Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan : The Plan may be viewed in its entirety at: http://www.spokanecounty.org/emergencymgmt/content.aspx?c=2863 CHAPTER 10. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE 10.1 HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN POINT OF CONTACT Primary Point of Contact Douglas Powell, Building Official 11703 E Sprague Avenue, Suite B-3 Spokane Valley, WA. 99206 Telephone: 509-720-5305 e-mail Address: dpowell@spokanevalley.org Alternate Point of Contact Jenny Nickerson, Senior Plans Examiner 11703 E Sprague Avenue, suite B-3 Spokane Valley, WA. 99206 Telephone: 509-720-5316 e-mail Address:jenny.nickerson@spokanevalley.org 10.2 JURISDICTION PROFILE The following is a summary of key information about the jurisdiction and its history: • Date of Incorporation—March 31, 2003 • Current Population -92,050 as of April 1, 2014 • Population Growth—Based on data from the Washington State Office of Financial Management and U.S. Census Bureau, Spokane Valley has experienced a 1.9 -percent increase in population since 2010. Spokane Valley has seen approximately a 13.3 -percent increase in population from its estimated population of 80,693 at the time of incorporation on March 31, 2003. • Location and Description—The City of Spokane Valley is located near the eastern border of Washington. The incorporated area of Spokane Valley encompasses 38.5 square miles of land area, with room for residential, commercial and industrial expansion. Within the incorporated city limits, there are 438 miles of roadway. It has an extensive retail tax base and is home to several major auto dealerships, the Spokane Business Park with more than 70 buildings ranging from 1,200 to 270,000 square feet, and the Spokane Valley Mall, which includes over 700,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area. There are more than 7,300 businesses registered to do business in Spokane Valley as of June 2013, with estimated annual retail sales in 2013 of $1.9 billion. • Brief History—Spokane Valley occupies the broad, gravelly valley of the Spokane River and was originally populated by the Spokane and Coeur d'Alene tribes. Antoine Plante (1812- 1890), a former fur trader, operated a ferry over the river beginning in about 1854. Over the next few decades, settlers began to establish farms, orchards, and trading posts such as the Dishman Store. Beginning in 1895, irrigation vastly increased the productivity of the land. Apples were the chief crop until about 1925, when truck farming took over. World War II brought a huge aluminum plant to Trentwood and hundreds of jobs. The 1950s brought a rapid growth trend toward suburban living, which caused a population boom in the last half of the century. Several incorporation drives were attempted and failed. Finally, in 2002, voters authorized the creation of a 38.5 -square -mile city. Today Spokane Valley is the 10th largest city in Washington. • Climate—At an elevation of 2,384 feet, Spokane Valley experiences all four seasons of the year. Annual average rainfall is 18.2 inches with an annual average snowfall of 20.1 inches 10-1 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes from November to April. Temperatures range from average January lows of 23°F to mid- summer average highs at 85.4°F. • Governing Body Format—The City of Spokane Valley is a non -charter code city and operates under a council-manager plan of government. It is governed under the optional municipal code of RCW Chapter 35A. Under this form of government, legislative authority is held by the elected City Council. The executive branch is led by the city manager. There are seven positions on the City Council, and all council positions are at -large positions. Councilmembers are generally elected to four-year terms, with elections held every two years. For continuity, position terms are staggered by two years so that not all positions are open for election at the same time. The chair of the council has the title of Mayor and presides at Council meetings. • Development Trends—The City of Spokane Valley and its immediate area are primarily urban and suburban residential with supporting retail and commercial enterprises. Heavy industrial uses are located along the BNSF/UP railways, primarily within the Industrial Park near the northeastern border of the city, which also houses light industrial and manufacturing uses. Washington's Growth Management Act (Chapter 36.70A RCW), requires that counties that meet specified population criteria, as well as cities within those counties, prepare and adopt a comprehensive long-range plan to serve as a guide for community development. The plan must consist of an integrated and internally consistent set of goals, policies, and implementation measures. In addition, the plan must focus on issues of the greatest concern to the community and be written in a clear and concise manner. City actions, such as those relating to land use allocations, annexations, zoning, subdivision and design review, redevelopment, and capital improvements, must be consistent with the plan. The City of Spokane Valley is in compliance and good standing with Chapter 36.70A RCW and adopted its most recent comprehensive plan in 2006. The most recent update occurred in 2013; the City will review and amend the Plan as necessary to allow for the management of future growth and development as identified in this plan. 10.3 JURISDICTION -SPECIFIC NATURAL HAZARD EVENT HISTORY Table 10-1 lists all past occurrences of natural hazards within the jurisdiction. Repetitive flood loss records are as follows: • Number of FEMA -Identified Repetitive Loss Properties: None • Number of FEMA -Identified Severe Repetitive Loss Properties: None • Number of Repetitive Flood Loss/Severe Repetitive Loss Properties That Have Been Mitigated: None 10.4 CAPABILITY ASSESSMENT The assessment of the jurisdiction's legal and regulatory capabilities is presented in Table 10-2. Information on the community's National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) compliance is presented in Table 10-3. The assessment of the jurisdiction's administrative and technical capabilities is presented in Table 10-4. The assessment of the jurisdiction's fiscal capabilities is presented in Table 10-5. Classifications under various community mitigation programs are presented in Table 10-6. 10.5 HAZARD RISK RANKING Table 10-7 presents the ranking of the hazards of concern. 10-2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE 10.6 HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN AND EVALUATION OF RECOMMENDED INITIATIVES Table 10-8 lists the initiatives that make up the jurisdiction's hazard mitigation plan. Table 10-9 identifies the priority for each initiative. Table 10-10 summarizes the mitigation initiatives by hazard of concern and the six mitigation types. 10.7 STATUS OF PREVIOUS PLAN INITIATIVES Table 10-11 summarizes the initiatives that were recommended in the previous version of the hazard mitigation plan and their implementation status at the time this update was prepared. 10.8 HAZARD AREA EXTENT AND LOCATION Hazard area extent and location maps are included at the end of this chapter. These maps are based on the best available data at the time of the preparation of this plan, and are considered to be adequate for planning purposes. TABLE 10-1. NATURAL HAZARD EVENTS Type of Event Severe Storm Wildfire Hurricane Katrina Severe Storm/landslides Severe Storm/Flooding Severe Storms Severe Storms/Flooding Wildfire Severe Storm/Flooding Volcanic Eruption Severe stolin/Flooding FEMA Disaster # (if applicable) FM -1825 FM -2783 DR -3227 DR -1172 DR -1159 DR -1152 DR -1100 DR -922 DR -769 DR -623 DR -545 Declaration Date 3/2/2009 6/10/2008 9/7/2005 3/18/1997 1/17/1997 11/19/1997 2/9/1996 11/13/1991 5/20/1986 5/21/1980 12/10/1977 10-3 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes TABLE 10-2. LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY State or Other Local Federal Jurisdictional State Authority Prohibitions Authority Mandated Comments Codes, Ordinances & Requirements Building Code Yes No No Yes Currently adopted Washington State Building Codes under the State Building Code Act, Chapter 19.27 RCW Zonings Yes No No No Title 19, Zoning Regulations, SVMC Subdivisions Yes No No No Title 20, Subdivision Regulations, SVMC Stormwater Yes No No Yes Title 22, Design and Development Management Standards, SVMC Post Disaster No No No No Recovery Real Estate Disclosure No No No Yes RCW 64.06.020 Growth Management Yes No No Yes RCW 36.70A Site Plan Review Yes No No No Requirements of Title 19, Zoning Regulations, SVMC Public Health and No No Yes Yes Spokane Regional Health and Safety Washington State Department of Health Environmental Protection Planning Documents General or Yes No No Yes Comprehensive Plan Is theplan equipped to provide linkage to this mitigationplan? Yes Floodplain or Basin Yes Yes Yes Yes Frequently Flooded areas are a Plan critical area in the Growth Management Act and must be regulated. Stormwater Plan Yes No No Yes Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual, April 2008. Capital Improvement Yes No No Yes Plan What types of capital facilities does the plan The Comprehensive Plan includes a Capital Facilities Element address? that addresses Streets, Fire, Libraries, Stormwater, sewer, water and City facilities. How often is theplan revised/updated? Annually Habitat Conservation No No No No Plan Economic No No No No Development Plan 10-4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE 10-5 TABLE 10-2. LEGAL AND REGULATORY CAPABILITY Local Authority State or Federal Prohibitions Other Jurisdictional Authority State Mandated Comments Shoreline Management Plan Community Wildfire Protection Plan Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations must be consistent with the Shoreline Management Act, RCW 90.58 Spokane County Community Wildfire Protection Plan (2014 draft plan currently under development is a renewal of an existing plan) Response/Recovery Planning Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan No No Yes No Spokane County DEM Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Terrorism Plan No No No No Yes Yes No No No No No Spokane County DEM Spokane County DEM Post -Disaster Recovery Plan Continuity of _Operations Plan Public Health Plans No No No No No No No No No 10-5 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes TABLE 10-3. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE What department is responsible for floodplain management in_your community? Who is your community's floodplain administrator? (department/position) Do you have any certified floodplain managers on staff in your community? What is the date of adoption of your flood damage prevention ordinance? When was the most recent Community Assistance Visit or Community Assistance Contact? To the best of your knowledge, does your community have any outstanding NFIP compliance violations that need to be addressed? If so,please state what they are. Do your flood hazard maps adequately address the flood risk within your community? (If no, please state why) Does your floodplain management staff need any assistance or training to support its floodplain management program? If so, what type of assistance/training is needed? Does your community participate in the Community Rating System (CRS)? If so, is your community seeking to improve its CRS Classification? If not, is your community interested in joining the CRS program? Community Development John Hohman, Community Development Director Gabe Gallinger, Development Engineering Manager Yes 3/11/2003 original, 6/25/2010 most current update. 9/18/2008 No No, Two major floodplains are currently unstudied approximate A zones that do not adequately address actual flood risk. No No, We are not currently interested in joining the CRS program. TABLE 10-4. ADMINISTRATIVE AND TECHNICAL CAPABILITY Staff/Personnel Resources Available? Department/Agency/Position Planners or engineers with knowledge of land Yes development and land management practices Community Development and Public Works Staff Engineers or professionals trained in building or Yes infrastructure construction practices Community Development and Public Works Staff Planners or engineers with an understanding of Yes natural hazards Community Development and Public Works Staff Staff with training in benefit/cost analysis Yes Surveyors No City Finance Staff Personnel skilled or trained in GIS applications Yes Scientist familiar with natural hazards in local area No Community Development and Public Works Staff Emergency manager Yes City Administrator and Building Official Grant writers Yes Community Development and Public Works Staff 10-6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE TABLE 10-5. FISCAL CAPABILITY Financial Resources Community Development Block Grants Capital Improvements Project Funding Authority to Levy Taxes for Specific Purposes User Fees for Water, Sewer, Gas or Electric Service Incur Debt through General Obligation Bonds Incur Debt through Special Tax Bonds Incur Debt through Private Activity Bonds Withhold Public Expenditures in Hazard -Prone Areas State Sponsored Grant Programs Development Impact Fees for Homebuyers or Developers Other Accessible or Eligible to Use? Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes N/A TABLE 10-6. COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATIONS Community Rating System Building Code Effectiveness Grading Schedule Public Protection Storm Ready Firewise Participating? No Yes Yes Yes No Classification 3/3 3 Blue Date Classified 10-7 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes TABLE 10-7. HAZARD RISK RANKING Rank Hazard Type Risk Rating Score (Probability x Impact) 1 Severe Storm 36 2 Wildfire 22 3 Flood 22 4 Earthquake 5 6 7 8 22 Volcano 8 Urban Fire 8 Drought 5 Hazardous Material 5 9 Landslide 5 10 Terrorism 3 10-8 TABLE 10-8. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Applies to new or existing assets Hazards Mitigated Objectives Estimated Met Lead Agency Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Included in Previous Plan? Initiative COSV-1—Enforce updated Building and Energy Codes. New & Existing Severe storm- and earthquake related structural damage to buildings. 1, 2, 3, 10 City of Low Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley, Washington Assoc. of Building Officials, Idaho Assoc. of Building Officials Washington State University Energy Program, International Code Council Short term No Initiative COSV-2—Educate residents in flood -prone areas by providing informational pamphlets. New & Existing Uninformed citizens in flood -prone areas. 2, 4, 5, 6, City of Low 8, 10 Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley, International Code Council Short term No 10-8 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE TABLE 10-8. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Applies to Included new or in existing Hazards Objectives Estimated Previous assets Mitigated Met Lead Agency Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Plan? Initiative COSV-3—Protect aquifer from critical materials through secondary containment requirements and documentation. New & Contamination 2, 4, 6, 11 City of Low City of Spokane Short term No Existing of drinking Spokane Valley water aquifer Valley beneath Community Spokane Valley Development Initiative COSV-1 Continue to maintain compliance and good standing under the National Flood Insurance Program. This will be accomplished through the implementation of floodplain management programs that, at a minimum, will meet the minimum requirements of the NFIP, which include the following: • Enforcement of the adopted flood damage prevention ordinance • Participating in floodplain identification and mapping updates • Providing public assistance/information on floodplain requirements and impacts. New and Flood 2, 4, 5, 6, Spokane Low Local Ongoing No Existing 8, 12 Valley Community Development Dep at intent Initiative COSV-5 Consider participation in the National Flood Insurance program, Community Rating System. New and Flood 2, 4, 5, 6, Spokane Low Local Long term Yes Existing 8, 12 Valley F-16 Community Development Depat anent Initiative COSV-6—Where appropriate, support retrofitting, purchase, or relocation of structures located in hazard -prone areas to protect structures from future damage, with properties with exposure to repetitive losses as a priority. Existing All Hazards 2, 10, 11 City of High FEMA Grant funding/ Long term No Spokane Local contributions valley Initiative COSV-7—Integrate the hazard mitigation plan into other plans, ordinances or programs to dictate land uses within the jurisdiction. New and All Hazards 2, 3, 4, 5, Spokane Low Local Short term No Existing 11 Valley Community Development Depat anent 10-9 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes TABLE 10-8. HAZARD MITIGATION ACTION PLAN MATRIX Applies to Included new or in existing Hazards Objectives Estimated Previous assets Mitigated Met Lead Agency Cost Sources of Funding Timeline Plan? Initiative COSV-8—Implement wildfire mitigation recommendations identified in the Spokane County CWPP. New and Wildfire 1, 2, 3, 4, Spokane Medium Local, Fire Grants, Short term No Existing 5, 7, 8, 9, Conservation FEMA Hazard 10, 11, 12 District, all Mitigation Grants County Fire Districts Initiative COSV-9—Continue to maintain and/or enhance the City's capability to enforce its codes and regulations that result in decreased risk exposure of new development. New and All Hazards 4, 5, 11 Spokane Low Local Short-term No Existing Conservation Ongoing District, all County Fire Districts Initiative COSV-10 Consider, where appropriate, the adoption of higher regulatory standards that will result in an increase in the community resilience of new development. New All Hazards 4, 5, 11 Spokane Low Local Long-term No Conservation District, all County Fire Districts Initiative COSV-11—Continue to support the countywide initiatives identified in this plan. New and All Hazards 1, 3, 4, 8 DEM Low Local Ongoing No Existing Initiative COSV-12—Actively participate in the plan maintenance strategy identified in this plan. New and All Hazards 1, 4, 8 DEM Low Local Short term no Existing Initiative COSV-13—Provide scour protection for vulnerable bridge abutments. Existing Flood 1, 11 Spokane High Hazard Mitigation Long term Yes Valley Grant Program, Flood F-4 Public Control Assistance Works Account Program, Public Works Trust Fund 10-10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE TABLE 10-9. MITIGATION STRATEGY PRIORITY SCHEDULE Initiative # # of Objectives Met Do Benefits Is Project Can Project Be Funded Equal or Grant- Under Existing Benefits Costs Exceed Costs? Eligible? Programs/ Budgets? Prioritya COSV-1 COSV-2 COSV-3 COSV-4 COSV-5 COSV-6 COSV-7 COSV-8 COSV-9 COSV-10 4 6 4 6 7 3 5 10 3 3 Medium Low Medium Medium Medium High Medium Medium Medium Medium Low Low Low Low Low High Low High Low Low Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No Yes No No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes No Medium Medium High High Medium Medium High High High Medium COSV- 11 COSV-12 COSV-13 4 3 2 Low Low High of priorities. Low Low High Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No High high medium 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 1, 6 1, 11 3 a. See Chapter 1 for explanation TABLE 10-10. ANALYSIS OF MITIGATION INITIATIVES Hazard Type Initiative Addressing Hazard, by Mitigation Typea 1. Prevention 3. Public 4. Natural 6. 2. Property Education and Resource 5. Emergency Structural Protection Awareness Protection Services Projects Drought Earthquake 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 1, 6 6 1, 11 11 3 11 11 1 Flood 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 2, 4, 5, 6 2, 4, 5, 11 3, 4, 5 5, 11 5, 13 Landslide 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 1, 6 1, 11 3 11 1 Severe Weather 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 3, 6 11 3, 11 Volcano 7, 9, 10, 11, 12 6, 11 11 Wildfire 3,7,8,9,10,11,12 3,6,8 types. 3,8,11 3,8 3,8,11 8 for explanation of mitigation a. See Chapter 1 10-11 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes 10-12 TABLE 10-11. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action # Action Status Comments Completed Carry Over to Plan Update Removed; No Longer Feasible All -Hazard Initiatives A-1 V. This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -5 A-2 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #4 A-3 ✓ This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -5 A-4 ✓ This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -3 A-5 ✓ This action now addressed by Objective #5 A-6 V. This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -7 A-7 V. This is now addressed by Objective #8 and Countywide Initiative #CW -7 A-8 V. This is now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 A-9 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #1 A-10 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1 and #3 A-11 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1 and #3 A-12 V. This is now addressed by Objective #3 and Countywide Initiative #CW -2 Now addressed by Objective #2 Now addressed by Objective #2 A-13 V. A-14 V. A-15 V. This is now addressed by Objectives #3 and #8 and Countywide Initiative #CW -2 A-16 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1, #3, and #8 A-17 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1, #3, and #8 A-18 V. Now addressed by Objectives #2 and #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 A-19 A-20 ✓ ✓ Now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -1 Now addressed by Objective #8 A-21 ✓ Now addressed by Objectives #2 and #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 A-22 V. This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -7 A-23 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1 and #3 A-24 ✓ Now addressed by Objectives #1 and #3 A-25 ✓ Now addressed by Objectives #1, #3 and #8 A-26 ✓ This task was completed as part of this plan update process A-27 ✓ Now addressed by Goal #1 A-28 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #1 10-12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE TABLE 10-11. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action # Action Status Comments Completed Carry Over to Plan Update Removed; No Longer Feasible A-29 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1 and #8 A-30 V. This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -7 Disease Drought D-1 and Epidemic Initiatives All disease and epidemic initiatives were removed from the plan due to the change of scope of the plan. The plan now only addresses natural hazards. These hazards are now addressed by the THIRA. iii Now addressed by Objective #1 V. Initiatives V. D-2 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 D-3 V. This was a City of Spokane initiative. Not feasible for the Spokane Valley. D-4 ✓ This was a City of Spokane initiative. Not feasible for the Spokane Valley. D-5 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 D-6 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #11 D-7 ✓ Now addressed by Objectives #7 and #8 and the CWPP. D-8 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #11 Earthquake E-1 Initiatives " Now addressed by Objective #4 ✓ E-2 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #10 E-3 V. Now addressed by Objective #1 E-4 V. Now addressed by Objectives #1, #10 and Countywide Initiative #CW -7 E-5 ✓ This is now addressed by Objectives #3 and #8 and Countywide Initiative #CW -2 E-6 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #1 E-7 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #5 E-8 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #5 E-9 ✓ Now addressed by Objectives #1 and #8 Flood Initiatives 6tl ,,, F-1 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #3 F-2 ✓ Determined to be no longer feasible during the plan update process. F-3 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #5 10-13 Spokane County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update; Volume 2—Planning Partner Annexes TABLE 10-11. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action # Action Status Comments Completed Carry Over to Plan Update Removed; No Longer Feasible F-4 V. Now addressed by CSV -13 F-5 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 F-6 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 F-7 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 F-8 V. Now addressed by CSV -4 F-9 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 F-10 V. Now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 F-11 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 F-12 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 F-13 V. Now addressed by Objectives #5 and #8 F-14 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 F-15 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #11 F-16 ✓ Now CSV -5 F-17 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #10 Now addressed by Objective #1 F-18 ✓ Hazardous Materias Initiatives4i& itiiiii ✓ All hazardous materials initiatives were removed from the plan due to the change of scope of the plan. The plan now only addresses natural hazards. These hazards are now addressed by the THIRA. Landslide Initiatives vd = L-1 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #5 L-2 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #5 L-3 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #3 L-4 V. Now addressed by Objectives #3 and #5 L-5 V. Now addressed by Objective #5 and Countywide Initiatives #CW -4 and #CW -6 L-6 V. Now addressed by Objective #4 L-7 V. Now addressed by Objective #1 L-8 V. Now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3 10-14 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ANNEX UPDATE TABLE 10-11. PREVIOUS ACTION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION STATUS Action Action Status Comments Completed Carry Over to Plan Update Removed; No Longer Feasible Severe Storm Initiatives 111 SS-1 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #10 SS -2 V. Now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -7 SS -3 ✓ This action now addressed by Countywide Initiative #CW -7 SS -4 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #1 SS -5 V. This is now addressed by Objective #3 and Countywide Initiative #CW -2 SS -6 V. Now addressed by Objective #10 SS -7 V. Now addressed by Objective #1 1111111111111111 Terrorism and Civil Disturbance Initiatives V. All terrorism and civil disturbance initiatives were removed from the plan due to the change of scope of the plan. The plan now only addresses natural hazards. These hazards are now addressed b the THIRA. Volcano Initiative ' , 4 V-1 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3. V-2 ✓ Now addressed by Objective #1 V-3 ✓ Now addressed by Objectives #2 and #4 and Countywide Initiative #CW -3. Wildland Fire Initiatives ✓ All wildland fire initiatives are now addressed by SC -17 and the CWPP which is in A I I endix G of Volume 1 of this Ilan u . date. Urban Fire Initiatives ✓ All urban fire initiatives are now addressed by SC -17 and the CWPP which is in Appendix G of Volume 1 of this plan update. 10-15 Montgomery Av CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Critical Facilities ▪ Airport Facility • Bus Facility • Communication Facility a A Dam Emergency Operations Center Fire StationFacility • Hazardous Material • Highway Bridge Highway Tunnel ED Medical Care Facility Police Station Facility • Potable Water Facility Power Facility • Rail Facility 0 Railway Bridge t School Facility • Wastewater Facility SPOMit Coin WASHING TON LIJ N fE 0 1 2 Miles CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Soil Classification National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) Soil Types by Site Class Site Class B - Rock Site Class C - Very Dense Soil, Soft Rock Site Class D - Stiff Soil Site Class E - Soft Soil This map is based on surficial geology published at a scale of 1:100,000 by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources (Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources staff, 2001). Designation of site classes was based on a large database of shear wave velocity data obtained in many of the geologic units shown in the 1:100,000 -scale geologic mapping. For units without velocity measurements, site class was assigned based on similarity to units in the shear wave database. In the methodology presented by BSSC (1997), site class B represents a soft rock condition, where earthquake shaking is neither amplified nor reduced by the near -surface geology. Site classes C, D, and E represent increasingly softer soil conditions which result in a progressively increasing amplification of ground shaking. Site class F is reserved for unusual soil conditions where prediction of the amplification of earthquake shaking can only be determined by a site-specific evaluation. Liquefiable soils also fall into site class F, but we have not included them on this map; please refer to the liquefaction susceptibility map for more information. SPOMit Coin WASHINGTON N fE 0 1 2 Miles CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Liquefaction Susceptibility Susceptible to Not Susceptible Liquefaction High Bedrock Moderate to High Peat Moderate Water Low to Moderate Ice Low Very Low to Low Very Low A liquefaction susceptibility map provides an estimate of the likelihood that soil will liquefy as a result of earthquake shaking. This type of map depicts the relative susceptibility in a range that varies from very low to high. Areas underlain by bedrock or peat are mapped separately as these earth materials are not liquefiable, although peat deposits may be subject to permanent ground deformation caused by earthquake shaking. This map is based solely on surficial geology published at a scale of 1:100,000 by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources. Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which strong earthquake shaking causes a soil to rapidly lose its strength and behave like quicksand. Liquefaction typically occurs in artificial fills and in areas of loose sandy soils that are saturated with water, such as low-lying coastal areas, lakeshores, and river valleys. When soil strength is lost during liquefaction, the consequences can be catastrophic. SPOMit Coin WASHINGTON N fE 0 1 2 Miles CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY FEMA DFIRM Flood Hazard Areas 1 percent annual flood risk (100 year) 0.2 percent annual flood risk (500 year) Flood hazard areas as depicted on FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. SPOI(Alt Coin G WASHINGTON j fE 0 1 2 Miles CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Average Expected Flame Length ❑ 0-2feet � 2-6feet ▪ 6-12feet Burn probability raster data were generated using the large fire simulator - FSim - developed for use in the Fire Program Analysis (FPA). FSim uses historical weather data and current landcover data for discrete geographical areas (Fire Planning Units - FPUs) and simulates fires in these FPUs. Using these simulated fires, an overall burn probability and marginal burn probabilities at four fire intensities (flame lengths) are returned by FSim for each 270m pixel in the FPU. FSim produces burn probabilities for six flame length classes. Summing the product of these burn probabilities and their respective flame length class midpoints equals the Conditional Flame Length (CFL) for the pixel. If the pixel burns, it most likely will burn at this intensity (flame length). SPOMit Coin WASHINGTON N fE 0 1 2 Miles CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Estimates of Annual Burn Probability ❑ 0 - 0.000019 ® 0.000019 - 0.0024 ❑ 0.0024 - 0.0055 ❑ 0.0055 - 0.0097 00.0097-0.019 © 0.019 - 0.041 Burn probability raster data were generated using the large fire simulator - FSim - developed for use in the Fire Program Analysis (FPA). FSim uses historical weather data and current landcover data for discrete geographical areas (Fire Planning Units - FPUs) and simulates fires in these FPUs. Using these simulated fires, an overall burn probability and marginal burn probabilities at four fire intensities (flame lengths) are returned by FSim for each 270m pixel in the FPU. FSim produces burn probabilities for six flame length classes. Summing the product of these burn probabilities and their respective flame length class midpoints equals the Conditional Flame Length (CFL) for the pixel. If the pixel burns, it most likely will burn at this intensity (flame length). SPor, Cain WASHINGTON N fE 0 1 2 Miles CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — Overview of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Beekeeping Regulations GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106, SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Urban beekeeping has emerged as one of the latest trends of urban agriculture. In most cases beekeeping is not allowed due to the residential lot size. SVMC 19.40.150(C) allows a maximum of 25 hives on lots 40,000 square feet or larger. When the City incorporated in 2003, Spokane Valley adopted Spokane County's zoning regulations on an interim basis. The beekeeping requirements specified that the number of hives was limited to one hive per 4,356 square feet of lot area, up to 25 hives. Therefore, a one acre lot could have a maximum of 10 hives. Beehives were to be located a minimum of 25 feet from all property lines and be isolated from public access by a security fence, or otherwise secured platform. In 2007, Spokane Valley adopted its own regulations which allowed a maximum of 25 hives on a minimum lot area of 40,000 square feet, and no setback requirements. A memo was prepared in July 2014 that detailed the establishment of the city's beekeeping regulations. The document is attached for your review. Staff will present an overview of the regulations, including a comparison of City requirements to that of other jurisdictions, and discuss beekeeping issues. OPTIONS: Take no action; request further research and/or begin code text amendment process; or take other action deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Council Discretion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Micki Harnois, Planner ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation, Memorandum with attachments 1. Staff Memo July 14, 2014 2. Presentation SliOkareN"' 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 0 Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall®spokanevatley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Date: John Hohman, CD Director July 17, 2014 Re: Beekeeping This memorandum responds to your request for information on Spokane Valley's beekeeping regulations, including a comparison to adjacent jurisdictions. Upon incorporation in 2003, Spokane Valley adopted Spokane County's zoning regulations on an interim basis. Hobby beekeeping was permitted in the UR -3.5 zone, the predominant residential zone at the time. Hobby beekeeping was defined as: "An activity, generally engaged in for personal use, where twenty-five (25) or fewer beehives are kept on a lot." The number of beehives was further limited to one hive per 4,356 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum of 25 beehives. A beehive is defined as a structure to contain one colony of bees and registered with the Washington State Dept. of Agriculture. Therefore, a one acre lot could have a maximum of 10 beehives. Beehives were required to be located 25 feet from all property lines and be isolated from public access by a security fence, or otherwise secured platform (see attached regulations). In 2007, Spokane Valley adopted its own zoning regulations. Beekeeping is included in the broader "Animal Raising and/or Keeping" category of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). SVMC Chapter 19.40.150 allows a maximum of 25 hives. Animal keeping, including beehives, is permitted in every residential zone but is limited to lots with a minimum of 40,000 square feet. The beekeeping issue was debated at the March 16, 2007 and April 12, 2007, Spokane Valley Planning Commission meetings. The Planning Commission discussed why bees are important, why they should or should not be allowed in residential areas, how many hives should be allowed, the size of the hives, location on a lot and whether it should be an allowed use within the City. At the April 12, 2007 meeting the Commissioners voted 4-3 in favor of allowing a maximum of 25 hives, but required a minimum lot size of 40,000 square feet. The Planning Commission's recommendation was later confirmed by the City Council upon adoption of the City's zoning regulations. The current code does not include any special setback requirements for beehives. Spokane Valley 19.40.150 Animal raising and keeping, Where permitted, the keeping of poultry and livestock (excluding swine and chickens) is subject to the following conditions: A. Minimum Lot Requirements, 1. In residential zones, the lot or tract must exceed 40,000 square feet; 2. In mixed-use zones, on lots or tracts with legally established residential uses that exceed 40,000 square feet; C. Beekeeping for noncommercial purposes is Limited to 25 hives; City of Spokane The City of Spokane allows beekeeping on all residential lots, limited to one bee colony per 4,350 square feet of lot area, up to a maximum of eight colonies. A colony is defined as a natural group of bees having a queen or queens. Spokane has setback regulations, operational regulations (adequate water supply, abating aggressive bees by re -queening hives, etc.) and beekeeper certification requirements (see attached regulations). Earlier this month, the Spokane City Council voted to ban the city purchase and use of neonicotinoids, or "nicotine -like" insecticides which have been proven to be harmful to bees. The ban applies only to city purchase, and does not extend to private use. Spokane County Beekeeping is permitted in all residential zones, limited to two hives for the first 4,356 square feet of lot area and one for every 4,356 square feet thereafter. There is no maximum number of hives specified in the regulations. The regulations include a 25 foot minimum setback from property lines, except that hives may be placed 5 feet from side or rear property lines when a "flyway barrier" is established. A flyway barrier is a 6 foot tall solid barrier that forces bees to fly at an elevation at least six feet above ground level over property lines (see attached regulations). City of Liberty Lake Beekeeping is classified as similar to Dangerous animaUlivestock keeping and is not permitted in any zone. City of Spokane Title 17C Land Use Standards Chapter 170.310 Animal Keeping Section 17C,310,130 Beekeeping A,Wherc Permitted. Beekeeping is alloyed 215 ;Ill accessory use oft any lot occupied by a single-fannily residence that is in the RA, RSV, kTF, RMF and RF -ID zones. Beekeeping for educational or research purposes by an institution suet) as college, high school or agricultural extension office is allowed as a Type II conditional UUSe permit in all zones, subject to the requirements of subsection (B)(1) through (5) below. B.Slnnclards Applicable to Bcekeeping. Beekeeping is subject to the following standards: 1,Location, Density and Maintenance of Colonies. a.Thc number of colonies is limited to one colony per lour thousand three hundred fifty square Feet of lot arca, up to n maximum of eight Colonies; and b.C'olonies shall be setback a minimum of twenty-five feet of any property line, except that a colony may be situated within toil fool of a side lot line or rear lot line provided the following provisions are mel: i.The beehives aro isolated from public flecCSS by a security fence as required under SMC 17C. 1 10.230(1=); and ii.Tlle beekeeper establishes and maintains a flyway barrier at least six foot in height consisting of a solid wall, solid fencing material, dense vegetation or combination thereof that is parallel lo the property line and extends ten feet beyond the colony in each direction so that all boos are forced to fly at an elevation of at least six feet above ground level over the property linos in the vicinity of the colony; or iii.The colony is situated ten feet or more above the grade of the nearest adjoining property line. 2,Colonias shall ho maintained in movable -frame hives with adequate space and management techniques to prevent overcrowding aid swanning. 3.11) any instance in which a colony exhibits aggressive or swarming behavior, the beekeeper must ensure that the colony is re -queened. Aggressive behavior is any instance in lvhicli unusual aggressive characteristics such irs Stinging or attacking without provocation ocoiirs. 4,Bvery beekeeper shall maintain an adequate supply of water for bees located close to eiteta colony. 5.Regislrntions and Training. n.All colonies shall be rc istered with the director of the state department of agriculture pursuant to RUN 15,60.021 no later than April 1st of each year. b.Thc beekeeper shall have completed the requirements for apprentie ship level of the Washington State Beekeeper's Association master beekeeper certification p]'o rani. Ditto Passed; Monday, September 24, 2007 Effective Date: Saturday, November 10, 2007 ORD C34109 Section 4 SpOkiltite County Beekeeping LDR, LDR-P, MDR, HDR zones) a. }3eekcoping is allowed as an accessory use on any lot or parcel occupied by a singicfamily residence. b. The keeping of bees shall meet the requirements of the Washington State Department of Agriculture RCW 15,60 oras hereafter amended. c. The number of'colonies allowed is lirnitecl to two (2) for the First x1,356 square feet of lot arca, and one (t) For every 4,356 square acct of lot arca thereafter. There k no limit on the number oFNucs.f,Nuclei. d. Beehives shall be setback a minimum of twenty -live (25) feet from any abutting side or rear property line Or public right -of -wily, except that beehives niay be setback up to five (5) feet from any abutting Side or rear _property line when the beekeeper establishes and maintains a flyway barrier as provided in Section (e) below. e. A flyway barrier shalt he at least six (6) feet in height consisting of a solid wall, solid fencing material, dense vegetation or combination thereof that is parallel to such side and/or rear properly line(s) and extends beyond the beehive(s) in each direction SO that Dees arc tuned to fly at on elevation of at least six (6) feet above ground level over the property lines in the vicinity of the colony, SOo ne lhdl ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NN. City Council Administrative Report December 2, 2014 Hobby Beekeeping Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 19.40.150 (C) S akare COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT G Dlvrsiaro Purpose of Presentation 1) Provide information to assist council in determining if City beekeeping �r� Beekeepivf regulations are adequate. ref B9INNiv; 2) Provide a survey of regulations in other, jurisdictions � 3) Discuss beekeeping issues and possible solutions is Spokane lhal ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,NNS G DivrsI N What is Beekeeping? • The maintenance of honey bee colonies, commonly in hives. • A beekeeper keeps bees — to collect their honey and other products that the hive produces (including beeswax, propolis, pollen, and royal jelly), — to pollinate crops; or — to produce bees for sale to other beekeepers. Roof Crownboa rd Super Queen excluder Dummy board Brood body Floor Porter escape Super frames Brood frames Entrance block 3 Spokanc r'aIic COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INNING DIVISION Survey of Typical Beekeeping Requirements from other Jurisdictions Maximum # of hives Registration w/ WSDA Sourc Water Spokane Valley City of Spokan Spokane County Kirkland Ellensburg ,11111, ,1111F 25 40,000 sf n/a n/a n/a 8 colonies 1 colony 10-25 ft Yes If per 4,350 sf applicable n/a 4,356 sf 5-25 ft n/a If n/a applicable 15 7,200 sf 25 ft Yes If n/a applicable n/a 21,780 sf n/a n/a n/a n/a 2/4 7,000 10 ft Yes n/a Yes sf/over 7,000 sf n/a Yes Note: Liberty Lake prohibits Beekeeping. Spokane Valley City of Spokane Spokane County Spakan r'aI1U COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INNING DIVISION What is the purpose of the Regulations—Number of Hives Kirkland Ellensburg 25 8 colonies n/a 15 n/a 2/4 • Perception that hives are a hazard • Research indicates no difference between 1 or 28 maximum hives if safety measures are taken • Recommendations vary - Home Beekeeping Guide recommends no more than 4 hives on 1/4 acre lots to avoid neighborhood nuisance issues. Spokanc r'aIic COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ►NN NG DIVISION What is the Purpose of the Regulation—Minimum lot area Jurisdictio Spokane Valley City of Spokane Spokane County Kirkland �r Minimum lot 40,000 sf 1 colony per 4,350 sf 4,356 sf 7,200 sf 21,780 sf 7,000 sf/over 7,000 sf • Minimizes potential conflict between people and honeybees • A feasible use on large lots Jurisdiction Spokane Valley City of Spokane Spokane County Kirkland EOM Ellensburg What is the purpose of the Regulation --Setbacks n/a 10-25 ft 5-25 ft 25 ft n/a 10 ft • Helps in lessening the fear factor of bee stings • Keeping bees out of sight helps avoid neighbor's concerns Spakan r'aI1U COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INNING DIVISION What is the purpose of the regulation—Registration with WSDA Jurisdictio Registration w/ WSDA Spokane Valley x_ City of Spokane Spokane County Kirkland Ellensburg n/a Yes n/a Yes n/a Yes RCW 15.60.021 Requirement • Resident and nonresident beekeepers shall register with WSDA and pay an annual fee 8 City of Spokane Spokane County Walla Walla Spokane r'aIic COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . . LANNING DIVISION What is the purpose of this regulation—Flyaway barrier Jurisdictio n Spokane Valley Kirkland Ellensburg n/a If applicable If applicable If applicable n/a n/a • Forces the bees' flight path above people's heads • Typical 6' high fence or shrubbery Fly0ealy Barrlrr M 4f1$$f*49 j.10.11 *isi+91144,60 **1440. * ** 0**�. *,01 4,41,464164404, • Bees travel in a straight path to hive • Out of sight -out of mind 9 City of Spokane Spokane County Spokane Valley Walla Walla Kirkland Spakan Valley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INNING DIVISION What is the Purpose of this Regulation—Source of Water Jurisdictio Ellensburg Source of Wa n/a Yes n/a n/a n/a Yes • Bees will look for the nearest water source which could include neighbor's pool or birdbath, e.g. • Honey bees need to collect water for pollination • Recommendation: Place at least 20 feet away from hive 10 Interim Regulations (2003-2007) City of Spokane Valley Beekeeping Maximum # of hives Minimum lot area Flyaway Barrier Current Regulations 25 4,356 sf 5 ft with a 6 ft barrier 25 ft with a security fence 5 ft if hive is 10 feet high with a security fence 25 40,000 sf No Yes No 11 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Key Notes • Honeybees are confused with yellow jackets, hornets, wasps, etc. • Honeybees are declining due to industrial pollution, pesticides and parasite infestations • When safety precautions are taken as presented, beekeeping can be a safe hobby for pollination and honey production • Trend increasing for urban agriculture --producing own food in cities 12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street vacation process overview GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140; RCW 35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The City adopted the first street vacation procedures in January 2004. Authority to consider a street vacation is granted to the City by Chapter 35.79, RCW and 35A.47.020 RCW. The street vacation procedures are prescribed by state law, which are found in SVMC Chapter 22.140. The City has processed 25 street vacations since 2004. Staff will present an overview of the street vacation process and answer questions. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner ATTACHMENT: Street vacation overview presentation A g-w',cLe/to STREET VACATIONS Administrative Report December 2, 2014 WHAT IS q STREET VACATION Term vacation means the complete or partial abandonment or termination of the public right to use a street, highway, or public service easement. • SVMC 22.140 • RCW 35A.47.020 statutory authority for cities • RCW 35.79 provides procedural framework to cities Z O x Who initiates... • Owners of interest in any abutting property may petition City Council or • More than 2/3 of abutting property owners must sign petition. • City Council may itself initiate a vacation by resolution. • If more than 50% of abutting property owners file written objections prior to public hearing, City is prohibited from proceeding. .11i I 4CC 114 KEY CONSIDFRATIONS • Abutting property owners typically receive 1/2 of vacated street. • City Council may seek compensation from requesting party. • Application received • Set public hearing date with City Council • Public Works, staff and agencies review proposal and prepare recommendation based upon staff analysis .4_ y_ plication_ processing.. . s:Plo COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING' DIVISION Z/1 zir Z LL N1 SVMC Title 22.140 (Street Vacations) STAFF (PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT): • Street connectivity (Arterial Street Plan) • Traffic volumes • Future development and access POTENTIAL CONDITIONS: • Relocation of road • Utility easements • Design/construct road improvements • Remove portion of road vacated • Time frame of completion .4_ppficationyrocessing continued... IMAMS AVE I_ `ON.. ,•E.-_ -■11!1.. _ _ 177�*r.1113�s720 711sees� h .�— I .4_ppficationyrocessing continued... PUBLIC HEARING NOTCING • Posted in 3 places • City Hall, Center Place, Valley Library • Published in the Valley Herald • Written notice to properties within a 400 foot radius • Signs posted at each end of proposed vacation area Spokane �1'a�lie� FILE No.: PROPOSAL: APPLICANT: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STREET VACATION STV=ol- 10 I t pfU OYr ' ,; � !! HEARING DATE/TIME: Y j ) • i LOCATION: STAFFiCONTACT: City Council Chambers, Suite 101 City cf Spokane Valley City Hall 11707 E- Sprague Avenue P4 f.0 lF- j 1! r ^q 722 5,-,7(‘• City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department. PUBLIC HEARING/DECISION MAKING • 3 Planning Commission meetings • 3 City Council meetings .z_ypficationyrocessing continued... 8 La. Z or 0 z, flc a' Plw < Liu > mi. I- ce fir) Applicant completes conditions of ordinance Staff a n d Agencies review Last step... Record with Auditor's Office the ordinance and record of survey .4_ppficationyrocessing continued.. 9 M vii INICIPAL COQ/HISTOR1C APPLICATION • 1St adopted January 20, 2004 (Ordinance 04-002) • Repealed original ordinance with adoption of Municipal Code in 2007 (Ordinance 07-015) • Processed 25 vacations since 2004 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report: Proposed street vacation on Old Mission Avenue (STV -2014-0001). GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140; RCW 35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The City received an application on November 12, 2014 requesting a street vacation of approximately 3,688 square feet on Old Mission Avenue. The adjacent property owner to the north (River Sequel, LLC) is making a request for the following reasons: 1. To enhance at the entry to the trailhead and development 2. Provide delineation between public and private ownership 3. Offset land lost by the dedication of right-of-way for the trailhead turnaround and parking The property owner is currently constructing a multi -family development north of the Old Mission Trailhead. Associated with the development, right-of-way was provided to the City for a turnaround and parking spaces for the public to access the Spokane River and the Centennial Trail. Additionally the owner has provided a $25,000 donation for trailhead landscaping and amenities. City staff has retained the services of a landscape architect to prepare plans for the enhancement of the trailhead which is anticipated beginning in spring 2015. Staff request Council include this item on the December 9, 2014 Consent Agenda as a motion setting the Planning Commission public hearing date for January 8, 2015. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place this item on the December 9 consent agenda setting the Planning Commission public hearing for January 8, 2015. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community Development Director ATTACHMENT: PowerPoint Presentation STV -20 14-0001 Overview of street vacation on Old Mission Avenue Administrative Report December 2, 2014 z Area of proposed street vacation 2 j:;�ky COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "43+ IcS - C5 Mission Avenue ,N: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Frontage improvements a part of development PROFOS Flyf TO 3E 2' 3E :14,'IF Ih\I S.E ATH. Ex.,: 7.f, :-'443-:>.SED RAYit EE 5' rEj-IN: BACK 'JF MOW, SDEolk. ENRW.: EPSDEPIT• - 13' ADE NULT1- -- SE d Entrance to Sidewalk connection - — totrailhead Street Vacation of Old Mission Avenue REQUEST: • Approximately 3,688 square feet requested to be vacated • Enhanced entry to the trailhead and development • Provide delineation between public and private ownership • Offset land lost by the dedication of right-of-way for the trailhead turnaround and parking CURRENT TRAILHEAD IMPROVEMENTS: • Recently dedicated 5,600 sf for a turnaround and parking at the trailhead • Donated $25,000 for trailhead enhancement QU EST1{)1NS? DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of November 24, 2014; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings December 9, 2014, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Dec 1] Presentation: Dr. Harken, Spokane Arts Council Sculpture 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes, Set Planning Commission Street Vacation Hearing) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance #14-020 Adopting Shoreline Master Plan — Lori Barlow 3. Proposed Resolution 14-013 Terminating Easement — Cary Driskell 4. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointment to Spokane Housing Authority -Mayor Grafos 5. Admin Report: Economic Development — Mike Basinger 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) (15 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 65 minutes] December 16, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Motion Consideration: Lodging Tax Allocations for 2015 2. Motion Consideration: Countywide Hazard Mitigation Plan- Doug Powell, Luis Garcia NON -ACTION ITEMS: 3. Sullivan Road Corridor Study — Eric Guth, Sean Messner 4. Economic Incentives — Erik Lamb, Mike Basinger 5. State and Local Marijuana Laws: Consumption/Possession by Minors— Erik Lamb 6. Legislative Agenda for Medical Marijuana — Erik Lamb, Mike Jackson 7. Minor Code Amendments to Dangerous Dog Regulations — Cary Driskell 8. Advance Agenda December 23, 2014 no meeting December 30, 2014, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Mayoral Appointments- Planning Commission NON -ACTION ITEMS: 2. Advance Agenda 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [due Mon, Dec 8] (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (20 minutes) (20 minutes) (25 minutes) (15 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 135 minutes] [due Mon, Dec 22] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] January 6, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Dec 29] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) January 13, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Jan 5] 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Dangerous Dog Code Regulations — Cary Driskell (20 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments, Lodging Tax Advisory Cmte Appt — Dean Grafos 10 minutes) 4. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments, Councilmembers to Committees — Mayor Grafos (10 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes] Draft Advance Agenda 11/26/2014 10:25:30 AM Page 1 of 2 January 20, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Review of Various City Marijuana Regulations and Bans Statewide 2. Governance Manual Discussion/Review — Chris Bainbridge 3. Advance Agenda January 27, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Amending Dangerous 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports February 3, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Advance Agenda February 10, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda [due Mon, Jan 12] (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Dog Code Regulations [*estimated [due Mon, Jan 19] (5 minutes) — Cary Driskell (20 minutes) (5 minutes) meeting: minutes] [due Mon, Jan 26] (5 minutes) [due Mon, Feb 2] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] February 17, 2015, Special Meeting Winter Workshop (8:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m.) (tentative) [due Mon, Feb 9] State and Federal Legislative Updates Tree City USA Tentative topics: CenterPlace City Hall Coal trains Marijuana February 17, 2015 — 6:00 p.m. meeting cancelled in lieu of Special Workshop meeting February 24, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Avista Electrical Franchise Bid Process, Explanation of Public Works Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement Historic Preservation Public Safety Quarterly Costs SEPA/NEPA Process — Eric Guth Setback Requirements Sidewalks and Developments Spokane Regional Transportation Mgmt Ctr Street Sweeping Bike Lanes Draft Advance Agenda 11/26/2014 10:25:30 AM [due Mon, Feb 16] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] Page 2 of 2 Spokane Walley City of Spokane Valley Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 11/03/2014 15:20 Page 1 of 11 I��Ol.il .0 00.0 Valley Pre -Application Meetings Requested Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community Development scheduled a total of 9 Pre -Application Meetings in October 2014. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application Commercial Pre -App Meeting Commercial Pre -App Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application Meeting 3 2 4 4 3 3 1 3 2 2 0 0 onthly Totals 5 11 15 10 13 11 6 11 5 9 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: 96 Printed 11/03/2014 15:20 Page 2 of 11 l��a.Ile 4000 Valley Online Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development received a total of 175 Online Applications in October 2014. 200 100 0 Jan Trade Permit Sign Permit Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Demolition Permit - Approach Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 11/03/2014 15:20 1,086 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 3 3 2 1 1 13 25 20 2 1 1 15 32 0 3 1 3 2 13 24 40 61 73 2 0 1 2 1 6 4 14 1 4 0 0 10 28 13 18 16 0 0 35 58 38 55 71 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 77 60 71 74 81 0 0 0 0 17 31 58 107 129 131 150 137 151 175 0 0 Page 3 of 11 I��a.Ile 4000 Valley, Construction Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development received a total of 498 Construction Applications in October 2014. 600 400 1 200 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Other Construction Permits ommercial - New ommercial - TI esidential - New ommercial - Trade esidential - Trade esidential - Accessory emolition • ign ther Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2 8 18 15 10 10 11 14 10 5 20 18 12 22 17 6 2 3 18 3 8 1 15 8 11 11 0 0 12 12 19 20 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 2 9 13 6 13 9 13 13 8 0 0 *2 *6 *4 *9 *3 *8 *8 *15 *2 *6 0 0 9 *11 *12 *17 *15 *9 8 10 *13 *14 0 0 *172 *201 *330 *429 *449 *376 *418 *324 *415 *438 0 0 onthly Totals 216 258 401 497 511 436 488 385 481 498 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 11/03/2014 15:20 4,171 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. .000 Valley Land Use Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development received a total of 58 Land Use Applications in October 2014. 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec rr, igi Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits oundary Line Adjustment • hort Plat Preliminary ong Plat Preliminary inding Site Plan Preliminary inal Platting r oning Map/Comp Plan Amendment tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) dministrative xception/Interpretation ther Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 1 6 8 1 4 4 1 3 5 0 0 4 0 2 3 3 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 4 0 3 2 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 3 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 1 3 4 5 1 1 0 0 6 0 0 0 52 50 56 61 39 42 49 48 51 49 0 0 onthly Totals 60 56 1 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 11/03/2014 15:20 614 Page 5 of 11 ,l.0 Valley' Construction Permits Issued Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development issued a total of 448 Construction Permits in October 2014. 600 400 200 11111111111111 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Other Construction Permits Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits M Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 18 0 9 26 23 2 5 3 11 4 12 12 9 15 18 5 4 36 8 20 18 11 12 17 3 1 0 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 8 3 8 12 5 15 8 13 12 7 0 0 2 4 2 9 2 7 6 16 2 5 0 0 7 11 10 16 12 9 9 9 13 10 0 0 147 152 271 318 328 319 332 263 302 389 0 0 11 10 5 5 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 onthly Totals 195 186 340 402 412 379 398 334 367 448 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 11/03/2014 16:40 3,461 Page 6 of 11 .000 Valley Land Use Applications Approved Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development approved a total of 50 Land Use Applications in October 2014. 50 111 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary f44911 Long Plat Preliminary MI Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 11/03/2014 16:40 563 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 5 0 2 6 3 1 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 3 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 4 5 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 44 53 57 53 44 41 47 44 54 45 0 0 52 59 71 67 52 50 52 48 62 50 0 0 Page 7 of 11 ��a.Ile .000 Valley Development Inspections Performed Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development performed a total of 1474 Development Inspections in October 2014. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec —•- 2012 2013 2014 20141 2013 2012 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 601 633 994 1,278 1,320 1,294 1,412 1,223 1,300 1,474 465 503 807 1,026 1,060 1,015 1,084 1,078 1,186 1,016 833 672 644 623 541 828 1,104 926 985 988 931 1,149 805 551 0 0 Printed 11/03/2014 16:40 Page 8 of 11 Totals Malley, Code Enforcement Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Code Enforcement Officers responded to 27 citizen requests in the month of October. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance MI Property Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 0 1 14 5 12 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 22 22 24 20 20 33 21 0 0 0 0 6 3 13 8 9 13 11 14 20 6 0 0 Monthly Totals 25 9 26 32 32 46 32 34 54 27 0 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 11/03/2014 16:44 317 Page 9 of 11 .000 Valley Revenue 2014 Trend 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Community Development Revenue totaled $149,197 in October 2014. 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 2013 Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $0 $77,877 $68,528 $112,700 $142,013 $215,223 $195,948 $140,018 $116,427 $124,983 $103,820 $95,140 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $87,229 $84,626 $109,029 $96,800 $305,185 $102,781 $87,805 $87,724 $107,002 $73,100 $72,948 $65,199 $68,914 $93,424 $214,601 $233,397 $136,568 $123,348 $204,739 $107,930 $121,658 $100,247 Printed 11/03/2014 16:44 Page 10 of 11 Totals $0 $1,482,915 $70,239 $1,462,916 $66,559 $51,745 $58,881 `1,083,255 $64,009 $1,278,238 $1,820,504 $1,552,558 $110,001 p,580,026 .000 Valley Building Permit Valuation 2014 Trend 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 10/31/2014 Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $7,691,600 in October 2014. 50, 000, 000 40, 000, 000 30, 000, 000 20, 000, 000 10, 000, 000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -rr-- 2014 2013 Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals $3.17M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $11.99M $7.69M $0.00M $0.00M"' 101.98M $7.33M $4.17M $4.69M $8.52M $19.74M $19.01M $11.55M $9.67M $9.40M $7.55M $4.36M $2.21M 108.21M $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M 173.95M $0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M ' 110.22M $1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M $65.20M $7.06M $6.34M $6.82M $6.64M $32.55M $4.86M $5.36M $3.91M $5.71M $3.01M $1.93M $2.29M 6.48M1 $1.91M $3.70M $2.74M $17.19M $17.03M $10.27M $7.75M $24.56M $5.18M $7.28M $4.87M $2.70M Printed 11/03/2014 16:44 Page 11 of 11 Stilikane .000 Val M©mer nd 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 4 cityhall®spokanevalley.org To: Mike Jackson, City Manager C- From: Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Date: November 20, 2014 Re Finance Department Activity Report — October 2014 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of October 2014 and included herein is a 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of October. 2014 Audit of the 2013 financial Records and Annual Financial Report The process of preparing the 2013 Annual Financial Report began in May and was completed in early July. The State Auditor's Office began their annual audit of 2013 in June and completed the single audit and financial statement portions of the audit by the end of July, and the accountability portion of the audit by mid-September. On September 17 we had a preliminary exit conference with the State Auditor that covered the Financial Statement and Single Audit phases of the audit process and the final Exit Conference on the Accountability phase of the audit is scheduled for November 13. 2014 Budget Amendment As we have progressed through 2014 the need for a number of budget amendments has arisen largely as a result of a variety of capital projects. Council review will take place at the following meetings: • October 14 Admin Report • October 28 Public Hearing • October 28 First reading on proposed Ordinance #14-014 amending the 2014 Budget • November 17 Second reading on proposed Ordinance #14-014 amending the 2014 Budget 2015 Budget Development Process The 2015 Budget is nearly complete and we anticipate no changes between now and final adoption. By the time the budget is adopted on November 17th the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including two public hearings. • June 17 Council budget workshop • September 2 Admin report on 2015 revenues and expenditures • September 9 Public hearing #1 on 2015 revenues and expenditures • October 7 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2015 Budget • October 14 Public hearing #2 on 2015 Budget • October 28 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2015 Budget • November 17 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2015 Budget P: tFinancelFinance Activity Reports1Council Monthly Reparts1201412014 10.docx Page 1 2015 Property Tax Levy A portion of the budget development process includes the annual property tax levy which in 2015 is anticipated to be $11,277,100 or approximately 29% of recurring General Fund revenues. Council consideration of this topic took place on the following dates: • September 2 — Admin report on 2015 revenues (including property taxes) and expenditures. • September 23 - Admin Report on proposed ordinance levying 2015 property taxes. • October 14 - First reading of Ordinance #14-011 levying 2015 property taxes and confirming tax levy. • October 28 - Second reading of Ordinance #14-011 levying 2015 property taxes and confirming tax levy. Lodging Tax The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • September 3 — Courtesy letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers. • October 3 - Grant applications due at City Hall. • October 27 - Grant applicant presentations to lodging tax advisory committee. • November 18 - Admin report to Council on results of lodging tax advisory committee meeting. • December 9 - City Council motion consideration: Award lodging tax for 2015. Fee Resolution As a part of preparing the annual budget City Departments are asked to review the Master Fee Schedule that is currently in place and determine whether changes in fees charged and/or language used in the governing resolution should be altered. This leads to an annual update to the fee resolution that sets fees for the following year. For calendar year 2015 there were no proposed changes and consequently Resolution #13-012 which sets fees effective January 1, 2014 will remain in force through 2015. Budget to Actual Comparison. Report A report reflecting 2014 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2014 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 16. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures, The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2013 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2014 Budget as adopted. o October 2014 activity. o Cumulative 2014 activity through October 2014. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. P.1FinancelFiinance Activity ReporfstCouncif Monthly Repot s1201412014 f0.docx Page 2 A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 72.84% of the amount budgeted with 83.3% of the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are collected. • Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2014 are $6,402,199 or 57.94% of the amount budgeted. • Sales tax collections represent only 9 -months of collections thus far because taxes collected in October are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of November. Collections are currently $13,035,730 or 79.53% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes currently total $357,821 or 57.96% of the amount budgeted. The second quarter payments were mostly received and recorded during July and August. Third quarter payments were due by October 31st and recorded as revenue in early November. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter; however, the third quarter payment was received and recorded in November. So far in 2014 we have received $682,050 or 56.23% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter but some are only once per quarter. Through October we've received remittances totaling $1,366,993 or 72.46% of the amount budgeted. • Fines, forfeitures and penalties revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through October 2014 we've received remittances through the month of September with receipts of $1,132,012 or 76.97% of the amount budgeted. • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently $1,399,612 or 111.49% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $557,693 or 96.19% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at 77.03% of the amount budgeted with 83.3% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. Investments (page 17) Investments at October 31 total $47,142,402 and are composed of $42,074,800 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,067,602 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 18) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through October and total $14,720,897 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $773,384 (5.54%) greater than for the same 9 -month period in 2013. Economic Indicators (pages 19 — 21) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 19) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201 412014 10.docx Page 3 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 20) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 19 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2005. • Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $657,589 or 5.31%. • Noteworthy to collections through September 2014 is that for the first time they exceeded those of 2007, the single year in which the City received the greatest amount of sales taxes to date. In other words, it has taken seven years to catch up with prerecession sales volume. Collections through October 2014 continue to exceed those for the same period in 2007. Page 20 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2005. • Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $32,751 or 8.23%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2013, exceeding the previous high in 2012 by $28,600. • 2014 collections appear to be on pace to exceed those of 2013. Page 21 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2005. • Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $103,925 or 9.9%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and are slowly gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 22) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value and the 2013 assessed value for 2014 property taxes is $7,168,991,028. Following the August 2014 refunding of the 2003 LTGO Bonds, the City has $7,035,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 6.54% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.31% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $5,650,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $1,385,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. P.' FinancelFinance Activity Reporfs4Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10.o'ocx Page 4 P:\FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports/201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 #001 - GENERAL FUND [RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Budget Year Elapsed 2014 83.3% 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget October October 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Property Tax 11,049,400 193,309 6,402,199 (4,647,201) 57.94% Sales Tax 16,390,000 1,552,736 13,035,730 (3,354,270) 79.53% Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,330,000 129,681 1,081,864 (248,136) 81.34% Sales Tax - Public Safety 745,000 71,623 603,303 (141,697) 80.98% Gambling Tax & Other Miscellaneous Taxes 617,400 82,678 357,821 (259,579) 57.96% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,213,000 30,177 682,050 (530,950) 56.23% State Shared Revenues 1,886,500 115,491 1,366,993 (519,507) 72.46% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,470,800 109,828 1,132,012 (338,788) 76,97% Community Development 1,255,400 131,992 1,399,612 144,212 111.49% Recreation Program Fees 579,800 41,802 557,693 (22,107) 96.19% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 85,500 13,252 71,281 (14,219) 83.37% Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 117,600 7,008 85,268 (32,332) 72.51% Transfer -in -#101 (street admin) 39,700 3,308 33,597 (6,103) 84.63% Transfer -in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Transfer -in -#402 (storm admin) 13,400 1,117 11,167 (2,233) 83.33% Total Recurring Revenues 36,823,500 2,484,001 26,820,591 (10,002,909) 72.84% Expenditures City Council 414,950 32,219 329,499 85,452 79.41% City Manager 660,843 53,222 528,495 132,348 79.97% Legal 448,922 39,703 371,161 77,761 82.68% Public Safely 23,384,643 1,867,730 18,270,957 5,113,686 78.13% Deputy City Manager 653,215 65,497 430,451 222,764 65.90% Finance 1,180,659 87,506 927,399 253,260 78.55% Human Resources 237,883 18,587 189,613 48,270 79.71% Public Works 882,694 51,984 582,519 300,175 65.99% Community Development - Administration 290,883 19,612 204,814 86,069 70.41% Community Development - Engineering 807,114 56,382 555,853 251,261 68.87% Community Development - Planning 928,906 54,553 723,315 205,591 7T87% Community Development - Building 1,267,656 90,352 978,828 288,828 77.22% Parks & Rec - Administration 274,743 24,062 215,296 59,447 78.36% Parks & Rec - Maintenance 796,200 67,631 595,957 200,243 74.85% Parks & Rec - Recreation 229,152 12,121 171,113 58,039 74.67% Parks & Rec - Aquatics 490,400 33,880 422,053 68,347 86.06% Parks & Rec - Senior Center 89,882 7,345 69,043 20,839 76.82% Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 828,842 65,917 636,145 192,697 76.75% Pavement Preservation 888,823 74,069 740,686 148,137 83.33% General Government 1,741,600 105,764 1,152,093 589,507 66.15% Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 325,000 27,083 270,833 54,167 83.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 36,823,010 2,855,219 28,366,123 8,456,887 77.03% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 490 (371,218) (1.545,533) (1,546,023) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues SCRAPS Pass -Through 0 0 56,568 56,568 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 56,568 56,568 #DIV/0! Expenditures Transfers out - #309 (park grant match) 192,500 0 0 192,500 0.00% SCRAPS Pass -Through 0 0 56,568 (56,568) #DIV/0! Law Enforcement Contingency 350,000 0 0 350,000 0.00% Public Works (autocad licenses) 8,800 0 8,800 0 100.00% Parks & Recreation (CP chairs) 11,350 0 11.192 158 98.61% Public Safety (precinct improvements) 24,000 0 3,060 20,940 12.75% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 586,650 0 79,620 507,030 13.57% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (586,650) 0 (23,051) 563,599 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (586,160) (371,218) (1,568,584) (982,424) Beginning unrestrictedfund balance 23,396,459 23,396,459 Ending unrestricted fund balance 22,810,299 21,827,875 Page 5 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 - STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 53.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 1,858,600 173,299 1,410,767 (447,833) 75.90% Investment Interest 3,000 115 1,628 (1,372) 54.26% Insurance Premiums & Recoveries 0 0 4,204 4,204 #DIV/01 Utility Tax 2,750,000 199,193 1,861,761 (888,239) 67.70% Miscellaneous Revenue 0 0 4,602 4,602 #DIVf0! Total Recurring Revenues 4,611,600 372,608 3,282,963 (1,328,637) 71.19% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 627,288 45,352 557,927 69,361 88.94% Supplies 386,500 27,845 369,704 16,796 95.65% Services & Charges 2,392,201 72,349 1,959,934 432,267 81.93% Intergovernmental Payments 798,000 111,042 440,941 357,059 55.26% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 39,700 3,308 33,083 6,617 83.33% Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (plow replace.) 75,000 6,250 62,500 12,500 83.33% Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle 10,777 898 8,981 1,796 83.33% Interfund Transfers -out - #311 (pavement preserva 282,000 23,500 235,000 47,000 83.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,611,466 290,544 3,668,071 943,395 79.54% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 134 82,064 (385,107) (385,241) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 0 15,150 15,150 #DIV/0! Transfer -in - #302 0 0 23 23 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 25 25 25 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 25 15,198 15,198 #DIV/0! Expenditures 133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS 0 0 173 (173) #DIVf0! Patch Trailer 30,000 33,532 33,532 (3,532) 111-77% 204 Hawk Signal 25,000 24 15,670 9,330 62.68% Software 6,750 0 0 6,750 0.00% 214 City Fiber Connection 0 8,000 8,000 Transfers out -#501 (new pickup) 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 76,750 41,556 57,375 27,375 74.76% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (76,750) (41,531) (42,178) 42,572 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (76,616) 40,532 (427,285) (342,659) Beginning fund balance 2,063,234 2,063,234 Ending fund balance 1,986,618 1,635,949 Page 6 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2014\2014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #103 - PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Miscellaneous Capital Outlay Total expenditures Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget 7,800 0 0 (7,800) 0.00% 0 3 25 25 #DIV10? 7,800 3 25 (7,775) 0.32% 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! O 0 0 #DIV10! 0 O 0 0 #DIV10! Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,800 3 25 (7,775) Beginning fund balance 71,871 71,871 Ending fund balance 79,671 71,896 #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 490,000 76,100 430,807 (59,193) 87.92% 300 23 224 (76) 74.64% Total revenues 490,300 Expenditures Interfund Transfers - #001 30,000 Tourism Promotion 547,000 Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance #106 - SOLID WASTE Revenues Charges for Goods and Services Total revenues Expenditures Professional Services Total expenditures 76,123 431,031 (59,269) 87.91% 0 0 30,000 0.00% 91,343 356,153 190,847 65.11% 577,000 (86, 700) 236,927 91,343 (15,221) 356,153 220,847 61.73% 74,878 (280,116) 236,927 150,227 311,805 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! 0 4 0 0 #DIV10! 0 10,010 10,010 (10,010) #DIV10! 0 10,010 10,010 (10,010) #DIV/01 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (10,010) (10,010) 10,010 Beginning fund balance 236,927 236,927 Ending fund balance 236,927 226,917 Page 7 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget #120 CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0 #011//0! 0 0 0 #DMO! Total revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 7,300 395 3,411 (3,889) 46.734 Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Total revenues 7,300 395 3,411 /3,889) 46.73% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIVt0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,300 395 3,411 (3,889) Beginning fund balance 5,448,502 5,448,502 Ending fund balance 5,455,802 5,451,913 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer 700 38 331 (369) 47.27% 0 0 0 0 #D1V/0! Subtotal revenues 700 38 331 (369) 47.27% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,300) 38 331 (500,369) Beginning fund balance 503,565 503,565 Ending fund balance 4,265 503,896 #123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,700 91 787 (913) 46.27% Interfund Transfer -#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 1,700 91 787 (913) 46.27% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 51,357 513,570 102,714 83,33% Total expenditures 616,284 51,357 513,570 102,714 83.33% Revenues over (under) expenditures (614,584) (51,266) (512,783) (103,627) Beginning fund balance 1,789,271 1,789,271 Ending fund balance 1,174,687 1,276,488 Page 8 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget October October 31 Remaining of Budget #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 441,520 0 145,760 (295,760) 33.01% Interfund Transfer -in - #301 93,152 6,565 76,429 (16,723) 82.05% Interfund Transfer -in - #302 931151 6,565 76,428 (16,723) 82.05% Proceeds from Bond Refunding 0 0 7,660,694 7,660,694 #DIV/0! Total revenues 627,823 13,130 7,959,312 7,331,489 1267.76% Expenditures Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 441,520 0 108,967 332,553 24.68% Debt Service Payments - Roads 186,303 0 17,626 168,677 9.46% Issuance Costs on Bond Refunding 0 0 107,341 Payments to Refunded Debt Escrow Agent 0 0 7,549,304 Total expenditures 627,823 0 7,783,238 501,230 1239.72% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 13,130 176,074 6,830,258 Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 176,074 Page 9 P:\FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 - REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 - Taxes Investment Interest Total revenues Budget Year Etapsed 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget 600,000 76,965 583,019 (16,982) 97.17% 1,000 67 575 (425) 57.48% 601,000 77,031 583,593 (17,407) 97.10% Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out -#204 93,152 6,565 76,429 16,723 82.05% Interfund Transfer -out -#303 268,575 0 16,221 252,354 6.04% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement preset), 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Total expenditures 546,199 6,565 277,122 269,077 50.74% Revenues over (under) expenditures 54,801 70,466 306,471 (286,484) Beginning fund balance 968,021 968,021 Ending fund balance 1,022,822 1,274,492 #302 REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2 - Taxes Investment Interest 600,000 75,358 570,997 (29,003) 95.17% 1,000 76 660 (340) 66.02% Total revenues 601,000 75,434 571,658 (29,343) 95.12% Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #101 0 0 23 Interfund Transfer -out - #204 93,151 6,565 76,428 16,723 82.05% Interfund Transfer -out - #303 585,097 0 95,376 489,721 16.30% Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement preset), 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Total expenditures 862,720 6,565 356,300 506,443 41.30% Revenues over (under) expenditures (261,720) 68,869 215,357 (535,786) Beginning fund balance 1,323,378 1,323,378 Ending fund balance 1,061,658 1,538,735 Page 10 P: 1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ton -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget October October 31 Remaining % of Budget #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 11,092,997 0 1,233,993 (9,859,005) 11.12% Developer Contribution 166,020 0 0 (166,020) 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 300 300 #DJV/01 Transfer -in - #301 268,575 0 16,221 (252,354) 6.04% Transfer -in - #302 585,097 0 95,376 (489,721) 16.30% Transfer -in - #312 Appleway Landscaping 250,000 0 14,450 (235,550) 5.78% Transfer -in - #312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 2,320,000 0 57,270 (2,262,730) 2.47% Transfer -in - #402 7,101 0 0 (7,101) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 2 15 15 #DIVID! Totai revenues 14,689,790 2 1,417,624 (13,272,166) 9.65% Expenditures 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 860,280 26,290 169,114 691,166 19.66% 061 Pines (SR27) ITS lmporvement SRTC 06-26 10,000 0 67 9,933 0.67% 113 Indiana/Sullivan PCC Intersection 0 0 113 123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 382,410 1,517 9,713 372,697 2.54% 141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 123,090 327 39,259 83,831 31.89% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 50,000 51 3,564 46,436 7.13% 145 Spokane Valiey-Millwood Trail 100,000 723 1,555 98,445 1.56% 149 Sidewalk Infill 364,425 15,297 80,718 283,707 22.15% 154 Sidewalk & Transit Stop Accessibility 0 0 435 (435) #DIV10! 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 8,888,189 57,779 319,195 8,568,994 3.59% 156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 1,158,727 9,486 662,300 496,427 57.16% 159 University Rd /1-90 Overpass Study 50,000 2,080 24,411 25,589 48.82% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 538,850 6,189 29,540 509,310 5.48% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 341,928 0 1,548 340,380 0.45% 168 Wellesley Ave Sidewalk & Adams Rd Sidewalk 30,000 0 3,318 26,682 11.06% 169 ArgonnelMullan Safety Indiana - Broadway 0 0 558 (558) #DIV10i 170 Argonne road: Empire Ave - Knox Ave. 0 0 0 0 #DIVID! 175 Sullivan UP Tracks UC (SB) Resurfacing 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! 176 Appleway Trail 0 0 0 0 #DIVID! 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 100,000 3,962 63,346 36,654 63.35% 181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 50,000 3,556 96,133 (46,133) 192.27% 185 Appleway Landscaping - Phase 1 250,000 107,597 167,291 82,709 66.92% 191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 0 1,915 8,279 (8,279) #DIVID! 196 8th Avenue - McKinnon to Fancher 300,000 806 44,218 255,782 14.74% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 91,891 0 149 91,742 0.16% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 0 0 191 (191) #DIV/0! 206 2015 CDBG Sidewalk Project 0 765 1,500 (1,500) #DIV/0! 210 Alcazar Driveway Reconstruction 0 862 862 (862) #DIV/0! Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 14,689,790 239,201 1,727,379 12,962,524 11.76% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (239,199) (309,755) (26,234,690) Beginning fund balance 61,827 61,827 Ending fund balance 61,827 (247,928) Page 11 P:1FnancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Month#y Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued #309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Interfund Transfer -in - #001 Investment Interest Miscellaneous Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget October October 31 Remaining % of Budget 192,500 0 0 (192,500) 0.00% 500 37 323 (177) 64.56% 0 0 50 50 #DIV10! Total revenues 193,000 37 373 (192,627) 0.19% Expenditures 203 Sand volleyball courts at Brown's Park 40,000 1,460 13,587 26,413 33.97% Edgecliff picnic shelter 65,000 0 0 65,000 0.00% 195 Discovery Playground equipment 50,000 31 51,280 (1,280) 102.56% Shade structure at Discovery Playground 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00% City entry sign 70,000 0 0 70,000 0.00% 209 Park signs 22,500 1,867 2,264 20,236 10.06% 176 ApplewayTrail 0 257,243 291,383 (291,383) #DIVf0! 208 Old Mission Trailhead Parking Improvements 0 0 235 (235) #DIVf01 212 Edgecliff Park Restroom Sewer Project 0 0 2,345 (2,345) #DIVf0! Total expenditures 262,500 260,601 361,095 (98,595) 137.56% Revenues over (under) expenditures (69,500) (260,563) (360,722) (94,033) Beginning fund balance 352,779 352,779 Ending fund balance 283,279 (7,943) #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Miscellaneous Investment Interest 0 0 839,285 839,285 #D1V10! 1,900 100 866 (1,034) 45.60% Total revenues 1,900 100 840,152 838,252 44218.50% Expenditures Capital 0 5,500 12,212 (12,212) #DIVf0! Miscellaneous 0 0 2,202 (2,202) #DIV/01 Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 0 5,500 14,413 (14,413) #DIV10! 1,900 (5,400) 825,738 852,665 1,101,903 1,101,903 1,103,803 1,927,641 Note: The fund balance includes $839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site tf the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City will repurchase this land al the original sale price of $839.285.10. Page 12 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12014\2014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget #311 - PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Interfund Transfers in- #101 282,000 23,500 235,000 (47,000) 83,33% Interfund Transfers in -#123 616,284 51,357 513,570 (102,714) 83.33% Interfund Transfers in- #301 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in -#302 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in -#001 888,823 74,069 740,686 (148,137) 83.33% Grant Proceeds 2,763,272 0 1,284,151 (1,479,121) 46.47% Miscellaneous 0 0 50 50 #DIV/01 Investment Interest 0 156 1,346 1,346 #DIV/0! Total revenues 4,919,323 149,081 3,143,747 (1,775,576) 63.91% Expenditures 162 2012 Street Preservation 400,000 0 2,097 397,903 0.52% 163 Sprague Ave Swale Upgrade, Park to 1-90 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01 174 2013 Street Preservation Ph1 0 0 191 (191) #DIV/0! 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 1,610,000 1,107 1,155,898 454,102 71.79% 180 Carnahan, Indiana & Sprague Presery 0 815 287,764 (287,764) #DIV/0! 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 198,760 835 166,602 32,158 83.82% 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 1,352,841 693,169 990,393 362,448 73.21% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 33,920 5,297 9,155 24,765 26.99% 202 Appleway Street Preservation Project 0 429 267,535 (267,535) #DIV/0! 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellsley & Wellstey 0 5,496 10,658 (10,658) #DIV/O! Other Services and Charges 0 0 48,490 (48,490) #DIV/0! Total expenditures 3,595,521 Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 707,148 2,938,782 1,323,802 (558,067) 798,609 204,964 798,609 2,122,411 1,003, 573 656,739 (2,432,315) 81.73% #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in -#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV/O! Developer Contribution 0 0 4,675 4,675 #DIV/0! Total revenues 0 0 4,675 4,675 #DIV/0t Exoenditures Capital Outlays 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Transfers out - #303 - Appleway Landscaping 250,000 0 0 250,000 0.00% Transfers out - #303 - Sullivan Rd W Bridge 2,320,000 0 71,719 2,248,281 3.09% Total expenditures 2,570,000 0 71,719 2,498,281 2.79% Revenues over (under) expenditures (2,570,000) 0 (67,044) (2,493,606) Beginning fund balance 7,742,299 7,742,299 Ending fund balance 5,172,299 7,675,255 Page 13 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83,3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget October October 31 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,835,000 18,729 1,074,411 (760,589) 58.55% Investment Interest 2,500 113 975 (1,525) 39.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Total Recurring Revenues 1,837,500 18,842 1,075,386 (762,114) 58.52% Expenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 505,535 24,619 280,935 224,600 55.57% Supplies 15,900 1,334 6,329 9,571 39.80% Services & Charges 1,065,076 93,391 828,013 237,063 77.74% Intergovernmental Payments 26,500 0 27,167 (667) 102.52% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 13,400 1,117 11,167 2,233 83.33% Interfund Transfers -out -#502 1,567 131 1,306 261 83.33% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,627,978 120,591 1,154,917 473,061 70.94% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 209,522 (101,749) (79,531) (289,053) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 0 22,360 40,444 40,444 #DIV10! Interfund Transfers -in 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Developer Contributions 0 0 51,492 51,492 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 22,360 91,936 91,936 #DIV10! Expenditures Capital - various projects 900,000 0 0 900,000 0.00% Property acquisition 250,000 0 0 250,000 0.00% VMS Trailer 16,000 0 15,546 454 97.16% 150 Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit 0 0 1,152 (1,152) #DIV/0! ULC Retrofits on Pvmnt Pres Projects 0 0 99,836 (99,836) #DIV10! 168 Wellesley Ave Sidewalk & Adams Rd Sidewalk 0 0 117 (117) #DIV10! 185 Appleway Landscaping 0 170,184 182,725 (182,725) #DIV/0! 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 0 0 76,618 (76,618) #DIVI01 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 34,960 71,391 (71,391) #DIV10! 193 Effectiveness Study 0 2,040 14,492 (14,492) #DIV/0! 196 8th Ave - McKinnon to Fancher 0 0 964 (964) #DIV10! 197 Broadway, Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit 0 15,504 33,185 (33,185) #DIV/0! 198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0 272 2,662 (2,662) #DIV/01 199 Havana - Yale Diversion 0 6,400 8,631 (8,631) #DIVIO! 200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0 6,350 10,148 (10,148) #DIV/0! Transfers out - #501 (new pickup) 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,196,000 235,710 517,467 678,533 43.27% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,196,000) (213,350) (425,531) 770,469 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (986,478) (315,100) (505,062) 481,416 Beginning working capital 2,319,423 2,319,423 Ending working capital 1,332,945 1,814,361 Page 14 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 ENTERPRISE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget #403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 259,106 (240,894) 51.82% Grant DOE - Decant Facility 0 298,626 629,904 629,904 #DIVIO! Grant DOT - Decant Facility 0 0 100,000 100,000 #DIV/0! Grant revenue 870,000 0 49,203 (820,797) 5.66% Investment interest 0 0 0 0 #DIVl0! Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Total revenues 1,370,000 298,626 1,038,213 (331,787) 75.78% Expenditures 163 Sprague swales 0 0 510 (510) #DIV/0! 190 14th Ave Custer to Carnahan 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 173 Decant Facility 0 147 836,239 (836,239) #DIV/0! Broadway SD retrofit (design only) 60,000 0 0 60,000 0.00% Outfall Diversion (design only) 60,000 0 0 60,000 0.00% 192 SE Yardley Retrofits 1,000,000 405,062 466,248 533,752 46.62% Total expenditures 1,120,000 405,209 1,302,998 (182,998) 116.34% Revenues over (under) expenditures 250,000 (106,583) (264,784) (148,789) Beginning working capital 333,610 333,610 Ending working capital 583,610 68,826 Page 15 P:IFinance\FInance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 - ER&R FUND Revenues Transfer -in - #001 Transfer -in -#101 Transfer -in - #101 (plow replace.) Transfer -in - #402 Investment Interest Transfer -in - #101 (new pickup) Transfer -in - #402 (new pickup) Budget Year Elapsed = 2014 83.3% 2014 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of October October 31 Remaining Budget 15,400 1,283 12,833 (2,567) 83.33% 10,777 898 8,981 (1,796) 83.33% 75,000 6,250 62,500 (12,500) 83.33% 1,567 131 1,306 (261) 83.33% 1,000 67 575 (425) 57.55% 15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.00% 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Total revenues 148,744 8,629 86,195 (62,549) 57.95% Expenditures Vehicle Acquisitions 90,000 0 102,782 (12,782) 114.20% Total expenditures 90,000 0 102,782 (12,782) 114.20% Revenues over (under) expenditures 58,744 8,629 (16,586) (49,767) Beginning working capital 1,183,348 1,183,348 Ending working capital 1,242,092 1,166,762 #502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 3 3 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer -#001 325,000 27,083 270,833 (54,167) 83.33% Total revenues 325,000 Expenditures Auto & Property Insurance Unemployment Claims Miscellaneous Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 27,084 270,837 (54,163) 83.33% 325,000 0 272,435 52,565 83.83% 0 36 7,822 (7,822) #DIV/0! 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 325,000 36 280,257 44,743 86.23% 0 27,048 (9,421) 124,171 124,171 124,171 114,750 (98, 906) SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 67,257,980 3,623,640 47,694,604 Per revenue status report 67,257,980 3,623,640 47,694,604 Difference 0 0 0 Total of Expenditures for all Funds Per expenditure status report 71,304,691 5,327,155 49,939,392 71,304,691 5,327,155 49, 939,392 0 0 0 Total Capital expenditures (included in total expenditures) 20,917,061 1,386,605 6,204,791 Page 16 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Counctl Monthly Reports12014\2014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 Beginning Deposits Withdrawls Interest Ending 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 105 Hotel/Motel 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 312 Capital Reserve Fund 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management *Local Government Investment Pool 11/12/2014 $ 43,442,150.91 $ 3,064,608.90 $ 2,002,993.30 $ 48,509,753.11 2,129,066.63 0.00 0.00 2,129, 066.63 (3,500,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (3,500,000.00) 3,581.91 0.00 0.00 3,581.91 $ 42,074,799.45 $ 3,064,608.90 $ 2,002,993.30 $ 47,142,401.65 matures: 6/28/2015 rate: 0.35% 11/4/2014 0.29% Balance Earnings 1 Budget Total LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments $ 43,442,150.91 $ 3,064,608.90 $ 2,002,993.30 $ 48,509,753.11 2,129,066.63 0.00 0.00 2,129, 066.63 (3,500,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (3,500,000.00) 3,581.91 0.00 0.00 3,581.91 $ 42,074,799.45 $ 3,064,608.90 $ 2,002,993.30 $ 47,142,401.65 matures: 6/28/2015 rate: 0.35% 11/4/2014 0.29% Balance Earnings 1 Budget Current Period Year to date $ 29,957,088.18 1,516,394.34 37,992.86 303,439.14 300,000.00 5,193,125.47 503, 725.35 1,197,424.22 880,644.10 1,004,934.30 22,858.56 491, 360.64 1,318,993.88 2,049,299.77 0.00 1,484,014.80 0.00 876, 003.22 5,102.82 $ 2,298.93 115.22 2.89 23.06 0.00 394.58 38.27 90.98 66.91 76.36 1.74 37.33 100.22 155.71 0.00 112.76 0.00 66.56 0.39 $ 31,522.16 1,627.80 24.96 223.92 0.00 3,411.42 330.90 786.59 574.82 660.16 15.02 322.79 866.47 1,346.20 0.00 974.88 0.00 575.46 3.35 $ 65,000.00 3,000.00 0.00 300.00 0.00 7,300.00 700.00 1,700.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 500.00 1,900.00 0.00 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 $ 47,142,401.65 $ 3,581.91 $ 43,266.90 $ 85,900.00 Page 17 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Counci? Monthly Reports1201412014 10 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Receipts For the Ten -Month Period Ended October 31, 2014 Month Received February March April May June July August September October November December January 2013 1,876,298.24 1,279,426.01 1,295,166.24 1,531,483,94 1,486,879.22 1,568,524.87 1,612,535.63 1,646,673.39 1,650, 525.59 2014 1,891,031.43 1,324,975.84 1,357,736.39 1,636,894.44 1,579,545,34 1,653,343.86 1,751,296.73 1,772,033.14 1,754,039.63 13, 947, 513.13 14, 720, 896.80 1,630,334.91 1,544,088.55 1,584,524.73 18,706,461.32 14, 720, 896.80 11/12/2014 Difference 14,733.19 45,549.83 62,570.15 105,410.50 92,666.12 84, 818.99 138,761.10 125,359.75 103,514.04 0.79% 3.56% 4.83% 6.88% 6.23% 5.41% 8.61% 7.61% 6.27% 773,383.67 5.54% Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Crminial Justice 0.10% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 18 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Collections - September For the years 2005 through 2014 H:ITax RevenuelSales Tax12014\sales tax collections 2014.xlsx 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 I 2013 2014 January 1,367,929 February 917,747 March 1,015,573 April 1,322,070 May 1,159,647 June 1,212,663 July 1,377,753 August 1,395,952 September 1,372,081 1,572,609 1,068, 743 1,072,330 1,371,030 1,392,111 1,362,737 1,555,124 1,405, 983 1,487,155 1,759,531 1,155,947 1,196, 575 1,479,603 1,353, 013 1,428, 868 1,579,586 1,516,324 1,546,705 1,729,680 1,129, 765 1,219,611 1,423,459 1,243,259 1,386,908 1,519,846 1,377,943 1,364,963 1,484, 350 1,098,575 1,068,811 1,134,552 1,098,054 1,151,772 1,309,401 1,212,531 1,227,813 1,491,059 963,749 1,018,468 1,184,137 1,102,523 1,123,907 1,260,873 1,211,450 1,191,558 1,460,548 990,157 1,015,762 1,284,180 1,187,737 1,248,218 1,332,834 1,279,500 1,294,403 1,589,887 1,009, 389 1,067,733 1,277,621 1,174,962 1,290,976 1,302,706 1,299,678 1,383,123 1,671,269 1,133,347 1,148,486 1,358, 834 1,320, 449 1,389, 802 1,424,243 1,465,563 1,466,148 1,677,887 1,170,640 1,201,991 1,448,539 1,400,956 1,462,558 1,545,052 1,575, 371 1,552,736 11/12/2014 2014 to 2013 Difference 6,618 0.40% 37,293 3.29% 53,505 4.66% 89,705 6.60% 80,507 6.10% 72,756 5.23% 120,809 8.48% 109,808 7.49% 86,588 5.91% Collected to date 11,141,415 12,287,822 13,016,152 12,395,434 10,785,859 10,547,724 11,093,339 11,396,075 12,378,141 13,035,730 657,589 5.31% October 1,520,176 1,526,910 1,601,038 1,344,217 1,236,493 1,269,505 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 0 November 1,095,566 1,369,940 1,443, 843 1,292,327 1,155,647 1,139,058 1,217, 933 1,349, 580 1,362,021 0 December 1,286,191 1,366,281 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1,141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 0 Total Collections 15,043,348 16,550,953 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 13,035,730 Budget Estimate 12,280,000 16,002,000 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,390,000 Actual over (under) budg 2,763.348 548,953 (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 (3,354,270) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 122.50% 103.43% 99.83% 94,42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% nla % change in annual total collected 10.93% 10.02% 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% nla % of budget collected through September 90.73% 76.79% 74.52% 72.42% 60.39% 73.20% 78.07% 80.20% 81.17% 79.53% % of actual total collected through September 74.06% 74.24% 74.64% 76.70% 75.70% 74.82% 74.70% 73.87% 74.62% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of September Page 19 14,000,000 12,000,000 10,000,000 September _ August --P` 8,000,000 July 6,000,000=- 4,040,040 June May a April �$ s .. s March a February a January 2.000,000 01 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Page 19 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through - Actual for the years 2005 through 2014 January February March April May June July August September 2005 1 2006 1 2007 20,691.03 19,976.81 22,828.15 29,748.41 29,017.66 35,330.35 43,841.82 46,852.10 46,746.18 20,653.49 20,946.09 24,308.48 34,371.82 32,522.06 34,256.71 49,744.62 45,916.16 50,126.53 25,137.92 25,310.66 29,190.35 37,950.53 31,371.01 36,267.07 56,281.99 51,120.70 57,260.34 H:1Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax12014\105 hotel mote] tax 2014.xlsx 11/1212014 2014 to 2013 Difference 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1_ 2011 1 2012 2013 2014 j $ 28,946.96 24,623.06 27,509.99 40,406.02 36,828.53 46,659.88 50,421.37 50, 818.35 60, 711.89 23,280.21 23,283.95 25,272.02 36.253.63 32, 588.80 40,414.59 43, 950.26 50,146.56 50, 817.62 22, 706.96 23, 416.94 24,232.35 39.463.49 34,683.32 39,935.36 47,385.18 54,922.99 59,418.96 22,212.21 22,792.14 24,611.28 38.230.49 33,790.69 41,403.41 49,311.97 57,451.68 58,908.16 21,442.32 21,548.82 25,654.64 52,130.37 37,478.44 43,970.70 52,818.60 57,229.23 64,298.70 24,184.84 25, 974.98 27, 738.65 40,979.25 40, 560.41 47,850.15 56,157.26 63,816.45 70,794.09 25,425.40 26,013.62 29,383.93 48,245.81 41,122.66 52,617.63 61,514.48 70,383.93 76,099.59 1,241 5.13% 39 0.15% 1,645 5.93% 7,267 17.73% 562 1.39% 4,767 9.96% 5,357 9.54% 6,567 10.29% 5,306 7.49% Total Collections 295,032.51 312,845.96 349,890.57 366,926.05 326,007.64 346,165.55 348,712.03 376,571.82 398,056.08 430,807.05 32,751 8.23% October 34,966.85 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 43,835.57 0.00 November 26,089.36 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 42,542.13 0.00 December 31.740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30.432.13 34.238.37 0.00 Total Collections 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 518,672.15 430,807.05 Budget Estimate 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400.000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 490,000.00 490,000.00 Actual over (under) budg (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 28,672.15 (59,192.95) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% n/a % change in annual total collected 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% n/a % of budget collected through SeatembeF % of actual total collected 67.54% 89.38% 87.47% 91.73% 63.67% 91.10% 72.65% 87.57% 81.24% 87.92% through September 76.07% 75.01% 75.80% 78.56% 76.89% 77.18% 76.20% 76.85% 76.75% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of September Page 20 500,000.00 450,000.00 September 400,000.00 August 350,000.00 300,000.00 _ - -July -June 250,000.00 200,000.00 = May 150,000.00 --- .a a April 11111 March o February ea January, 100,000.00 50,000.00 0.00 , 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Page 20 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA lst and 2nd 114% REST Collections through September Actual for the years 2005 through 2014 January February March April May June July August September H:1Tax Revenue \REET120141301 and 302 REET for 2014.xlsx 2005 2006 1 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 147,819.56 128,082.35 198,013.09 192,012.44 240,765.59 284,268.67 209,350.53 280,881.50 214,738.94 243,894.16 172,154.72 182,065.71 173,796.61 306,871.66 226,526.64 2,104.30 451,700.06 188,066.23 228,896.76 129,919.79 263,834.60 211,787.08 222,677.17 257,477.05 323,945.47 208,039.87 165,287.21 145, 963.47 159, 503.34 133,513.35 128,366.69 158, 506.43 178, 202.98 217, 942.98 133,905.93 131,240.36 55,281.25 45,180.53 73, 306.86 81,155.83 77, 463.58 105, 020.98 122,530.36 115, 829.68 93,862.17 59, 887.08 64,121.61 86,204.41 99,507.19 109, 624.89 105, 680.28 84,834.48 72,630.27 75,812.10 64,128.13 36,443.36 95, 879.78 79,681.38 124,691.60 81, 579.34 79,629.06 129,472.44 68,019.83 46, 358.75 56,114.56 71,729.67 86,537.14 111,627.22 124,976.28 101,048.69 106,517.19 63,516.73 56, 898.40 155,226.07 72,171.53 90,376.91 116,164.91 139,112.11 128,921.02 117,149.90 174,070.25 61,191.55 67,048.50 81.723.70 105,448.15 198, 869.74 106, 675.77 208,199.38 172, 536.46 152,322.59 11/12/2014 2014 to 2013 Difference 4,293 (88,178) (56.81%) 9,552 13.24% 15,071 16.68% 82,705 71.20% (32,436) (23.32%) 79,278 61.49% 55,387 47.28% (21,748) (12.49%) 7.55% Collected to date 1,895,932.67 1,947,180.09 2,011,865.00 1,387,145.53 769,631.24 758,302.31 759,524.92 768,426.23 1,050,091.10 1,154,015.84 103,925 9.90% October 244,590.31 211,091.20 206,442.92 355,655.60 113,960.52 93,256.02 61,396.23 238,094.79 117,805.76 0.00 November 190,964.73 141.729.09 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 78,324.02 0.00 December 159,381.40 161,285.23 179,567.77 96,086,00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077.29 74,299.65 75,429.19 0.00 Total distributed by Spokane County 2,490,869.11 2,461,285.61 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185,706.66 1,321,650.07 1,154,015.84 Budget estimate 4,006,361.00 2.000.000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,200,000.00 Actual over (under) budget (1,515,491.89) 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911.777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 321,650.07 (45,984.16) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 62.17% 123.06% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% nla % change in annual total collected % of budget collected through September % of actual total collected through September 23.92% (1.19%) 5.22% (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% nla 47.32% 97.36% 100.59% 69.36% 38.48% 99.78% 94.94% 80.89% 105.01% 96.17% 76.12% 79.11% 77.69% 69.82% 70.72% 78.80% 79.06% 64.81% 79.45% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of September 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 7 September 1,500,000.00 a August 4JUly 1,000,000.00 ■June ■ May 500,000.00 - 0.00 - ■April ■ March MI February ■January - Yna L'- 4 --- - - 2005 2005 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 rage H:\Bonds\debt capacity.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Debt Capacity 8/17/2014 2013 Assessed Value for 2014 Property Taxes Voted (UTGO) Nonvoted (LTGO) Voted park Voted utility 1.00% of assessed value 1.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 7,168,991,028 Maximum Debt Capacity Outstanding as of 12/31/2013 Remaining Debt Capacity Utilized 71,689,910 107,534,865 179,224,776 179,224,776 537,674,327 0 7,035,000 0 0 7,035,000 71,689,910 100,499,865 179,224,776 179,224,776 530,639,327 n 0.00% 6.54% 0.00% 0.00% 1.31% Bonds Remaining 2014 LTGO Bonds Period Ending CenterPlace Road & Street Improvement. Total 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 12/1/2018 12/1/2019 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 12/1/2022 12/1/2023 12/1/2024 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 12/1/2027 12/1/2028 12/1/2029 12/1/2030 12/1/2031 12/1/2032 12/1/2033 225,000 175,000 185,000 190,000 230,000 255,000 290,000 320,000 350,000 390,000 430,000 465,000 505,000 395,000 300,000 245,000 225,000 180,000 130,000 165,000 135,00 125,OOC 130,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 360,000 300,000 315,000 320,000 365,000 395,000 430,000 465,000 500,000 545,000 430,000 465,000 505,000 395,000 300,000 245,000 225,000 180,000 130,000 165,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 Page 22 Rick VanLeuven Chief of Police Spokane Valley Police Department Services provided in partnership with the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. Ozzie Knezovich Sheriff TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: November 24, 2014 RE: Monthly Report October 2014 October 2014: October 2013: CAD incidents: 4,871 CAD incidents: 4,782 Reports taken: 1,806 Reports taken: 1,744 Traffic stops: 904 Traffic stops: 1,061 Traffic reports: 275 Traffic reports: 222 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self -initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing October residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend -line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self -Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the October Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For example, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake area to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. ADMINISTRATIVE: The month began with the annual Law Enforcement/SCOPE Appreciation and Awards Banquet. Although each and every day, ALL of our deputies and staff proudly serve the citizens of Spokane County and do so with dedication, honor and professionalism, we take time each year to recognize Sheriff's Office Employees and Outstanding Citizens who went above and beyond expectations. The awards are overseen by the Law Enforcement Awards Committee comprised of several employees throughout the Sheriffs Office. The committee receives many nominations during the year and they Page 1 carefully consider each nomination and decide who the recipients should be. The "Sheriffs Star" Award recipients are chosen by Sheriff Knezovich for an individual or group's outstanding job performance, dedication and professionalism. Following are a few of the recipients recognized this year: OUTSTANDING CITIZEN AWARD: Jim and Sharon Ball S.C.O.P.E.Volunteers These two individuals are volunteers who have jumped in with enthusiasm to help the Spokane Valley Investigative Unit. They have assumed many tasks that save our detectives countless hours, enabling them to work more cases and solve more crimes. They have become very efficient at data collection, distribution of paperwork, returning recovered property to victims and numerous other day-to-day tasks. We appreciate all they do and cannot thank them enough for that and their smiling faces every day! Pat DeVries - In April 2014, Mr. DeVries donated 15 cubicle workstations to the detectives of the Spokane Valley Investigative Unit. This generous donation not only increased the office's efficiency and work environment, it enabled us to move forward with our plan to enhance our staffing. Pat's support of law enforcement is deeply appreciated and it benefits not only our agency, but the entire community as well! ANNUAL MERIT AWARD: The Annual Merit Award was presented to the members of the Spokane Regional Air Support Unit (Air 1). This group of men has worked relentlessly and successfully through the Accreditation process. They are one of six Air Support Units in the entire nation to become fully accredited through the Public Safety Aviation Accreditation Committee/Airborne Law Enforcement Association (ALEA). Being accredited emphasizes safety for each and every mission to which they respond. And, it is worth noting, all of the pilots are volunteers and donate their precious time to help make our community a safer place to live. The Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) Unit of the Sheriff's Office was also awarded the Annual Merit Award. The dedication and professionalism by each and every member of this specialized team has led to being appreciated and utilized by multiple outside, including out-of-state agencies. This team responds to calls with potentially volatile situations, as well as community service events, contributing to both the safety and enjoyable aspects of Spokane County citizen's everyday lives. LIFE SAVING AWARD: Deputy Randy Watts - On 07/18/2014, due to his close proximity, Deputy Watts responded to a call for the need of emergency medical assistance. A woman had just given birth and her newborn baby was not breathing. Deputy Watts cleared the baby's airway and performed CPR. He carried the infant to the ambulance and continued chest compressions while in route to the hospital. About half way to the hospital, the infant was able to maintain her heart rate and began to sporadically breathe on her own. Prior to leaving the hospital, Deputy Watts learned the infant was off of the ventilator and in stable condition. SHERIFF'S STAR AWARD: Deputy Jeff Thurman & K-9 Laslo Team - This team's performance has excelled beyond expectations during the 18 months they have been together. During this time frame, Deputy Thurman and K9 Laslo have apprehended nearly 200 criminals! They continue to be a positive reflection of our agency and other K-9 teams and for this we are truly grateful. Thank You! Page 2 Sergeant Mark Nygren - Sgt. Nygren's performance has been above and beyond what is expected or required in the position he holds. His work with the Technology Systems, Go Books Program, and Tracking/Maintenance issues has been outstanding and is truly appreciated. New Drug Take Back Box for Valley Precinct — Chief VanLeuven has been working over the past few months on locating an appropriate container to be used for a drug take -back box that will be mounted in the Valley Precinct's lobby. After receiving the container, it needed some attention to get it into working order for the intended purpose. Bob Blenz, our mechanic at the precinct, did some welding on the container and then the employees at Apex Industries received the box to prep and paint. In early October, Chief VanLeuven went over to Apex, located in the Industrial Park, to meet and thank Matt Matthews and Gordon Cudney, the owners, for their donation of materials and employees' time to paint the drug take -back container. Chief VanLeuven (pictured) presented them with a Letter of Appreciation Apex crew for your involvement in making this happen. for all their hard work! Thank you Chief VanLeuven along with his wife attended the Central Valley Annual Holiday SCOPE Potluck. To beat the rush of all the holiday parties, Central Valley SCOPE plans their party well in advance. The evening included good food, good friends, and good conversation. Thank you CV SCOPE for hosting a wonderful event. Chief VanLeuven and Lt. Lyons attended the Special Olympics Breakfast at the Davenport in early October. Again, this is an annual event attended by many in law enforcement in support of Special Olympics. The Spokane Valley Police Department became accredited in 2011. Agency accreditation is for four years, so SVPD has begun planning for our reaccreditation in 2015. Chief VanLeuven developed an Accreditation Team and in October, Sgt. Nygren, who is heading up the Accreditation Team, began training stakeholders on a myriad of topics to prepare them to participate in the reaccreditation process. Chief VanLeuven attended the trainings at the onset to convey the importance of accreditation and reinforce how crucial each person's involvement is in obtaining our reaccreditation. The end of the month brought Below 100 Training at the Sheriff's Training Center in Spokane Valley, attended by Chief VanLeuven and Lt. Lyons along with others from the Spokane Valley Police and Sheriff's Office. Below 100 is an initiative to reduce Line of Duty Deaths (LODD) below 100 annually across the nation. The five points of Below 100 include: Wear your belt, Wear your vest, Watch your speed, WIN (What's Important Now?), and Remember: Complacency Kills! In asking why this is important, department leaders who have engaged with Below 100 have reported improvement in the desired areas and a noted level of employee appreciation for the effort. Bottom line: Below 100 is about officer safety. Page 3 Chief VanLeuven along with other community partners attended the Pioneer Human Services Event, a Spokane Partnership Celebration. Sheriff Knezovich was the guest speaker, emphasizing the importance of community-based programs. Chief VanLeuven once again participated in the Annual Hope House Fashion Show in late October. He joined Sheriff Knezovich along with other law enforcement and local personalities to raise funds for an organization that supports a great need in this community. As background, in the late 90's, a serial murderer preyed on vulnerable Spokane women, particularly homeless women with complicated mental- health and substance -abuse histories. At the time, there was no safe place for these women to go, until concerned citizens formed Hope House (then known as the Downtown Women's Shelter). Each year since then, the Fashion Show tells the story. The star models are always local law enforcement officials, in tribute to those who stopped the murders and continue to work tirelessly on behalf of Hope House. Historically, the celebrity roster has also included media and sports personalities. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In addition to the above persons recognized at the annual banquet, the 2014 SCOPE Life -Time Achievement Award is given to a volunteer each year in recognition of their continued involvement with SCOPE. The recipient's accomplishments and dedication, and continued support of SCOPE's programs and mission are all taken into consideration. This year's recipient was Bob Grinnell. Bob has been with Edgecliff SCOPE since 2002 and has dedicated many hours to the station. In addition to working long hours to reduce crime in the neighborhood, Bob has spent a lot of time improving the Edgecliff facility, both inside and out, and has assisted with fundraising for the station. Bob is known for his leadership qualities and has taken the lead for many of the station's programs. One area where he has recently made a difference is in the placement of speed awareness signs throughout Spokane Valley. During his many years with SCOPE, Bob has initiated numerous community events and has overseen training for the SCOPE volunteers. In spite of declining health and eyesight these past few years, Bob continues to be dedicated to SCOPE. With the support of his daughter, Laura, Bob has remained active; and as a team, they have accomplished a lot for the station. SCOPE brought in 24 new volunteers in the month of October. In addition, the Spokane County Commissioners signed a proclamation that November 2014 be recognized as SCOPE Appreciation Month. S.C.O.P.E. Participated In: • Sheriff's Annual Law Enforcement and Volunteer Appreciation Banquet • Progress Elementary School Bike Safety Training • SCOPE Basic Training • Several SCOPE stations open on Halloween. • Spokane Valley Parks and Recreation "Haunted Pool" • East Valley Community Coalition Meeting • Crime Stoppers Meeting • Goodwill GoodGuides Mentoring Program • Fall Free Spokane Coalition Meeting • GSSAC Coalition Meeting • Operation Family ID October 2014 Volunteers Hours per Station Page 4 Location # Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 6 286.0 42.0 328.0 Edgecliff 29 732.0 78.0 810.0 Trentwood 6 240.0 104.5 344.5 University 23 744.0 247.0 991.0 TOTALS 64 2,002.0 471.5 2473.5 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $53,477.07 for October 2014 Spokane Valley Graffiti Report 2012 2013 2014 Jan. 0 2 3 Feb. 0 7 16 March 2 13 11 April 14 9 30 May 16 4 4 June 15 9 13 July 41 7 12 Aug. 57 22 6 Sept. 26 4 12 Oct. 30 7 Nov. 19 7 Dec. 37 1 Total 257 92 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 49 on -scene hours (including travel time) in October, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 17 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. The total number of hours for Special Events in October totaled 38, which were all within the unincorporated county. Total October volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 492; year-to-date total is 5,220 hours. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in September totaled 26 and in October 26 with 6 vehicles in September and 3 in October, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Nine hulks were processed in September and 17 hulks processed in October. During the month of October, a total of 83 vehicles were processed; the total for 2014 to date is 788. Page 5 SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT TRAINING HOURS SCSO SVPD TOTAL January 0 25 35 60 February 0 28 55 83 March 0 43 59 102 April 4.5 41 32 73 May 0 31 29 60 June 0 18 32 50 July 0 17 30 47 August 0 26 35 61 September 0 41 49 90 October 4.5 5 47 86 YTD - TOTAL 9 270 404 706 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of Vol. # of Hrs # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non -Disabled Infractions Issued January 4 40 4 0 0 February 6 78 25 0 0 March 3 57 11 0 0 April 3 52 2 0 0 May 2 52 9 0 0 June 1 18 9 0 0 July 2 62 5 0 0 August 1 18 1 0 0 September 3 30 1 0 0 October 4 20 0 0 0 YTD Total 29 427 67 0 0 Spokane County # of Vol. # of Hrs # of Disabled Infractions Issued # of Warnings Issued # of Non- Disabled Infractions Issued January 2 11 2 0 0 February 8 10 4 0 0 March 2 23.5 0 0 0 April 4 26.5 0 0 0 May 2 30.5 0 0 0 June 2 9 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 1 17 0 0 0 September 2 10.5 1 0 0 October 4 32 2 0 0 YTD Total 27 170 9 0 0 Page 6 OPERATIONS: Runkle Meets Detectives, Again - Spokane Valley Sheriff's Investigative Unit (SVIU) detectives arrested a 51 -year-old male suspect in early October as part of an on-going investigation stemming from a burglary of the Painted Hills Golf Course in July. SVIU also served a search warrant in the 1300 block of North Magnolia where they recovered additional items believed to be stolen. At the time of the Painted Hills Golf Course burglary, an alert citizen took a picture of the suspect vehicle and reported the suspicious activity. SVIU detectives served multiple search warrants related to this investigation in early August, where several items believed to be stolen where recovered. SVIU detectives believe this male suspect was working with a 30 -year-old male suspect and a 25 -year-old female suspect, and they are responsible for several burglaries in Spokane Valley and Spokane County. Detectives recently learned the older male suspect recycled 700 pounds of "scrap" copper wire for $1,700. This wire matched copper wire stolen from a business in North Spokane County where several thousand pounds were taken. The 51 -year-old male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for Possession of Stolen Property 2nd Degree, Theft 1St Degree, Burglary 2nd Degree, Money Laundering and Identity Theft 1St Degree. He had three local felony convictions and has had numerous contacts by law enforcement dating back to 1996. The other male suspect shows three active felony warrants for his arrest for charges of Burglary 2nd Degree, Attempting to Elude and Possession of a Controlled Substance. This investigation continues and additional charges are expected. Pedestrian's Actions Get Deputy's Attention - Due to the dangerous actions of a pedestrian, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Louis Acosta arrested a 21 -year-old male for a misdemeanor warrant and a new felony charge of possession of a controlled substance. In early October, just before 12:30 a.m., Deputy Acosta was travelling south on Pines Road in his fully marked Spokane Valley patrol car when the male ran across Pines right in front of the deputy's patrol vehicle. Deputy Acosta turned around and contacted the male, who immediately apologized for "jaywalking" and said he was walking to his friend's residence. The male was arrested after Deputy Acosta learned there was an outstanding misdemeanor warrant for his arrest. While at the Spokane County Jail, Deputy Acosta was informed a Detention Officer located a clear plastic baggy containing a white crystallized substance in the male's sock. Recognizing the substance as methamphetamine, Deputy Acosta added an additional felony charge of Possession of a Controlled Substance. The substance was later field tested, which showed a presumptive positive result for amphetamines. The male was given a warning for crossing in the middle of a roadway. Spokane Valley Deputies Successfully Disarm Woman Wielding Knives - On a Sunday afternoon in mid-October, Spokane Valley and Spokane County Sheriff's Deputies successfully disarmed a woman who, acting strangely, would not follow commands and even charged a Spokane Valley deputy while holding two large knives. With time available, deputies successfully deescalated this extremely dangerous situation by a formulated plan to use less -lethal force, along with lethal cover, to take her into custody without injuries. Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Darrell Stidham responded to a report of a person with a weapon who was acting strange and waving a "box cutter" at a neighbor in the 13700 block of East Rich in Spokane Valley. The woman later approached the neighbor while he was in his vehicle and made statements about the devil. The neighbor stated the woman was holding a box cutter and swiped it across the window of his vehicle. The neighbor believed the woman might be having some type of medical issue and he was very concerned due to her irrational behavior. Deputy Stidham walked over to the woman's driveway and began to approach the residence when he observed the woman standing outside by the side of the residence. She was talking to herself and laughing. When Deputy Stidham asked her if she was ok, she spun around and yelled "Get off my property!" Deputy Stidham told her he was leaving, but asked if she needed any medical help. The Page 7 woman reached down and picked up two large knives, raised them up to her chest and began running toward Deputy Stidham. He drew his pistol, began to retreat, while yelling for the woman to drop the knives. She raised the knives up above her shoulders and began to close the distance as Deputy Stidham continued to backup while ordering her to drop the knives. Fortunately, the woman tripped and fell to the ground giving Deputy Stidham enough time to back away to a safe distance and wait for additional units to arrive. When additional deputies arrived, they formulated a plan to use a moving patrol vehicle as cover with the option of using less -lethal force to safely detain the woman while other deputies deployed lethal force cover if needed. As the deputies began to approach behind the moving patrol vehicle, they continually ordered the woman to drop the knives but she refused to comply. She began to approach the deputies, but then turned toward a parked vehicle in her driveway. As the deputies continued to approach, she turned and faced the deputies. She failed to comply with continual demands to drop the knives as she stared at the deputies. Fearing the woman would charge the deputies forcing them to use deadly force or that she would gain access to the vehicle, become mobile and pose a more serious threat to herself, deputies and the community, Deputy Cunningham fired two less -lethal beanbag rounds to her upper leg area. The rounds seemed to have little effect as she turned toward the deputies, began smiling and started walking toward them. Deputies continued to yell commands to drop the knives as Deputy Cunningham fired another less -lethal beanbag round. This time, the woman fell to the ground, but she continued to grip the knives. A fourth less -lethal beanbag round was fired causing her to drop the knives. Deputies moved forward and after a short struggle, they placed her in handcuffs. The woman received medical attention at the scene and was transported to a local hospital for additional treatment due to her actions. While at the hospital, she thanked Deputy Stidham for not shooting her. She apologized and said she thought she needed to kill Deputy Stidham, believing he was the devil dressed in a police uniform. The woman was not charged with a crime. This incident could have come to a very different conclusion if it wasn't for the discretion and care shown by Deputy Stidham and the assisting deputies. Deadly force could have been used in this situation as Deputy Stidham's life was clearly in imminent danger as well as the safety of citizens in the area. Because Deputy Stidham was able to keep his distance and there was time for additional deputies to assist, less -lethal force became an option along with lethal force cover. This is an example of why less -lethal force is not always an option and why it is deployed in life-threatening situations only when lethal force cover is also available. Suspicious Activity/Luring Information — In mid-October, the Spokane Valley Police Department and Spokane County Sheriff's Office made the public aware of suspicious activity/attempted luring that had occurred over the past five weeks in the area of East Broadway and East Mission Avenue in Spokane Valley. There were three reports where a male had offered a ride to females, a younger looking adult, and two juveniles. These incidents occurred in the morning hours between 7:15 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. in the 13300 block of East Mission and Mission and Adams. The male was described as in his 40s -50s, approximately 5'08"-6"00", 150-200 lbs, balding on top with white/grey hair on the sides and may wear glasses. He was described as driving a red "SUV" type vehicle, possibly a Ford and that he speaks with a heavy accent. Spokane Valley and Spokane County deputies increased patrols in this area and were in contact with Central Valley School District officials. Approximately four days later, on a late Friday afternoon in mid-October, Spokane County Sheriff's Office Major Crimes detectives arrested a 38 -year-old male for felony Kidnapping 2nd Degree with Sexual Motivation. The suspect was identified as a possible suspect in three additional child luring incidents after receiving several tips from the public. Detectives believe there may be additional victims who have not been identified and are asking them to come forward. Page 8 The first incident was reported on September 5th, 2014, at approximately 09:30 a.m., when the 23 - year -old victim, with a developmental disability, reported a male suspect approached her while she was waiting at a bus stop in the area of 13300 block of East Mission. The male, whom she did not know, asked her if she wanted a ride in his car. She asked him to repeat himself and he said "What if I drag you to my car?" She said the male grabbed her arm during the incident, but she pulled away. The male walked away to a red SUV and then stared at her as he slowly drove by her. She said she was afraid of the male and described him as having a very strong accent, possibly Italian, was 6'0" and approximately 185-195 lbs. Several tips from the public were received and deputies contacted the suspect driving his red SUV on October 14th, 2014. As the investigation continued, the suspect was identified by the victims during photo lineups. Detectives also learned of a similar incident that occurred on September 12th 2013, in the area of Francis and Crestline. The 17 -year-old victim reported being approached by a male as she walked to a bus stop just after 8:00 p.m. The male, described as 40-50 years old, 5'08", chubby, with patchy gray hair with glasses, began talking to her in Russian. She told him she could not understand him and the male introduced himself and extended his hand for a handshake. The victim said she got a bad feeling and told the male she needed to leave. The male began rubbing his hand up the victim's arm and stated his vehicle was close and they could go and make babies. As the victim turned and started to walk away, the suspect grabbed her arm, started to pull and said "No, you can come to my car." The victim pulled her arm away but the suspect grabbed her again. The female victim punched the suspect in the face and ran away. The suspect got into his older light maroon colored SUV and began to follow her. The victim continued to run, eventually lost the suspect and made it back to her residence. The victim in this case also picked the suspect from a photo lineup and detectives charged him late Friday afternoon with Kidnapping 2nd Degree with Sexual Motivation. Later in October, Spokane Major Crimes Detectives charged the 38 -year-old male suspect with an additional charge of Kidnapping 2nd Degree with Sexual Motivation. A victim contacted detectives after seeing the previous press release regarding the suspect's arrest. The victim advised she was contacted by the suspect while engaging in escort/prostitution type activity in late 2013. She identified the suspect and stated he was not driving the red SUV he has been associated with. During this incident, he is reported to have been driving a small dark colored sedan type vehicle. The victim reported when she got into his vehicle, he immediately began to drive. She became fearful after she observed a tarp over the back seat, rope and possibly a shovel. She told the suspect to stop the car, but he refused. She said she was able to get away when she dove from the moving car as he grabbed her by the arm and continued to refuse to stop the vehicle. This is an on-going investigation and detectives believe the suspect, through his actions, is a danger to the public and that there are additional victims who have not yet been identified yet. Detectives believe the suspect contacted several females engaging in escort or prostitution type activity and they are urging any potential victims to come forward. Victims should be assured their safety and the safety of the community is the focus of this investigation and their activity or reason for having any contact with the suspect is not the concern of investigators. Anyone who has been a victim of a similar incident or has additional information about these incidents or the suspect is urged to call Detective Kirk Keyser at 509-477-6611. Don't Victimize Your Neighbor — In mid-October, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Rob Cunningham arrested a 34 -year-old male for three counts of Theft 3rd for continually plugging an electrical cord into his neighbor's residence located in the 5800 block of East 4th Avenue and stealing electricity. The victim first found the electrical cord plugged into her residence on October 11th. She called Crime Check and reported the incident and the cord was unplugged. A few hours Page 9 later, she found the cord plugged back into her outside receptacle. She called and reported this second incident and requested a law enforcement response. Spokane Valley Sheriff's deputies responded but could not make contact with the suspect. The following morning, the victim woke up and found the suspect had plugged the electrical cord in again. Deputy Cunningham responded and tried to contact the suspect, but no one answered the door. The victim told Deputy Cunningham she was retired, in her 70's, and was on a tight budget. Deputy Cunningham unplugged the electrical cords and seized them as evidence. Deputy Cunningham went back to the location a few hours later and contacted the suspect as he walked from his residence to his car. He arrested the suspect and transported him to the Spokane County Jail and booked him for three misdemeanor charges of Theft 3rd Armed Robbery Suspect Arrested - Spokane Valley Sheriff's deputies located an armed robbery suspect within 25 minutes after he robbed a Spokane Valley Business one Saturday morning in mid- October. Deputies responded to the robbery call just prior to 11:00 a.m., at Zanies, located at 12928 E. Indiana in Spokane Valley. The employee reported a 25 -year-old male entered the store demanding potpourri (SPICE) while displaying a large hunting knife. After receiving the product, the male suspect fled the store on foot. At approximately 11:20 a.m., Deputy Kiehn located the suspect sitting on a curb behind one of the businesses as he was checking the area east of Zanies. The male matched the physical description of the suspect and appeared to be under the influence of some type of intoxicate. When asked if he had a knife, the male mumbled something as he began to reach inside his oversized coat. Deputy Kiehn, with the assistance of Deputy Lance, maintained control of the male and located a large hunting knife in his waistband where he was attempting to reach. After being arrested and informed of his rights, the suspect admitted he was addicted to smoking spice and needed some, but didn't have the money to purchase it. The employee positively identified the male as the person who robbed the store. The packets of product stolen from the store were found in the male suspect's pockets and in his backpack, along with the clothes he wore during the robbery. Four additional knives were also located in the male's backpack. The suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail for Robbery 1st Degree, which is a felony. Thanks to Your Tips: Suspect Arrested in less than 24 Hours - Spokane County Sheriff's Office Major Crimes Detectives requested the community's assistance in identifying the driver or owner of a vehicle suspected of being used in an assault with a firearm and attempted robbery. The incident occurred at approximately 5:30 p.m. on August 13th, 2014, in the area of the 4400 block of East Sprague Avenue in Spokane Valley. Detectives had not been successful in identifying a suspect, as information was limited. They were hoping someone could help identify a possible suspect due to the distinctive paint scheme of the vehicle he was believed to be driving. Detectives believed the vehicle was a late 80's to early 90's light grey/silver Lincoln Continental with royal blue paint at an approximate 45 degree angle from the front wheel wells up to the hood. It also appeared the hood, roof, and top of the truck were painted blue. Detectives received several tips within hours and the following day, less than 24 hours later, they arrested a 21 -year-old male suspect for Robbery 1st Degree, Burglary 1st Degree and Assault 2nd Degree. Even though the suspect had the vehicle repainted, tips from our community helped detectives identify him and safely take him into custody. Thank you citizens for your help and support as we work together to keep our community safe! Suspect Arrested For Shooting Valley Tavern — In late October, Detectives from the Spokane Valley Investigative Unit developed probable cause to arrest a 39 -year-old male suspect for the shooting that occurred the prior weekend at the Jackson Hole Tavern located at 122 S. Bowdish in the Spokane Valley. At closing time in the early morning hours in mid-October, the suspect and an associate were asked to leave the establishment by a bartender. The suspect returned about an hour later and shot several rounds into the front of the tavern with a .40 caliber handgun. Fortunately, the employees had left a few minutes prior to the shooting. Initial estimates indicate that the cost to Page 10 repair all the windows and interior damage will exceed $4,000. The bullets not only destroyed many of the windows, but caused damage to the interior decorations and left holes in the interior walls. Some rounds came dangerously close to striking containers of compressed gas and the tavern's water heater. Detectives, assisted by the Spokane County Sheriff's Office SWAT Team, arrested the male suspect at his residence during the execution of a search warrant. Detectives recovered evidence at the residence associating the male suspect with the crime. The suspect is a previously convicted felon who was charged with being a Felon in Possession of a Firearm, Felony Malicious Mischief and Reckless Endangerment. He was booked into jail for the felony charges of Malicious Mischief and Unlawful Possession of a Firearm along with Reckless Endangerment. Targeted Patrol Successful — While patrolling an area that has seen an increase in reported criminal activity, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Louis Acosta contacted and arrested a 28 -year-old male for warrants and possession of heroin. In late October at 8:00 p.m., Deputy Acosta was providing additional patrols in the area of East 2nd Avenue and Custer Road due to an increase in reported drug activity, vehicle thefts and recovered stolen vehicles. He observed a male leaving a residence in the 4600 block of East 2nd Avenue where he had recently received information regarding an unusual amount of people coming and going during all hours of the evening. Deputy Acosta contacted the 28 -year-old male, explained why he was being contacted, and asked the male if he would talk to him. The male suspect agreed and verbally identified himself. Deputy Acosta checked the male's name with dispatch and learned the male had two confirmed felony warrants for his arrest. After his arrest, the male suspect stated he had heroin in the coin pocket of his jeans. Deputy Acosta searched the male and located a small black container with a brown tar like substance inside. The substance was field tested and showed a positive presumptive result for heroin. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for the two warrants and a new felony charge for Possession of a Controlled Substance, Heroin. He is currently being held for two counts of Possession of Stolen Property 1St Degree, two counts of Possession of Stolen Property 2nd Degree and Possession of a Controlled Substance. This is a great example of how information and tips from our citizens is used to adjust patrols and be more effective as we address criminal activity and keep our community safe. Roll Call Video on Distracted Driving - We are delighted to share a distracted driving roll call video with you (View on YouTube: Roll Call Distracted Driving Review Edit 4.0), and hope you will share it with others. Law enforcement in our county volunteered to be interviewed for this project, so we were included in an early release of this video. Statewide distribution will take place in the coming months. Distracted driving is a risk factor in nearly 30 percent of fatal crashes in Washington State. Officers increasingly report contacting drivers they felt were impaired, and discovering the cause of impairment was checking email, reading a text message, or talking on a handheld phone. State-of-the-art enforcement practices are the most powerful tool in convincing drivers to put down their phones. The Washington Traffic Safety Commission reports citizen support of more aggressive distracted driving violations is at an all-time high and is working with key stakeholders to strengthen and clarify the law in preparation for the coming legislative session. This video was produced with the assistance of injury experts, prosecutors, Target Zero Teams, and advice from police officers, sheriff's deputies, and troopers from across the state. We hope it will provide information to improve distracted driving enforcement and crash scene investigation. Page 11 2014 OCTOBER CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Oct -14 Oct -13 2014 2013 2,013 2,012 2011 2010 2009 2008 BURGLARY 78 95 961 896 1101 1062 1027 936 725 753 FORGERY 57 74 565 701 850 826 593 341 297 354 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 130 148 1326 1379 1628 1770 1566 1183 1245 893 NON -CRIMINAL 12 10 130 89 106 108 160 917 892 944 PROPERTY OTHER 129 127 1215 1242 1469 1236 1126 837 933 828 RECOVERED VEHICLES 42 51 394 470 541 446 416 365 187 319 STOLEN VEHICLES 48 58 476 513 602 586 566 496 298 496 THEFT 279 292 2583 2540 3040 2636 2512 2365 2162 1,846 VEHICLE OTHER 25 14 222 234 268 287 195 3 5 7 VEHICLE PROWLING 91 150 976 999 1206 1165 1491 1395 920 1069 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 891 1,019 8,848 9,063 10,811 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 ASSAULT 88 82 921 791 950 936 963 895 927 869 DOA/SUICIDE 17 19 193 194 225 256 213 188 210 269 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 46 19 376 495 538 600 714 1297 1226 1063 HOMICIDE 0 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 3 KIDNAP 5 0 37 18 24 17 15 16 21 16 MENTAL 21 30 249 230 268 270 253 289 310 360 MP 12 7 109 134 156 154 125 128 115 95 PERSONS OTHER 264 207 2848 2673 3124 3112 2484 1692 1621 1,354 ROBBERY 13 12 76 89 96 79 98 68 75 71 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 12 7 112 122 148 212 162 153 159 95 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 478 385 4282 4748 5531 5638 4997 4727 4,667 4,195 ADULT RAPE 8 5 60 27 38 89 67 44 35 44 CHILD ABUSE 7 1 38 23 26 27 89 115 159 148 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 15 21 198 187 236 190 184 206 157 86 SEX REGISTRATION 0 1 0 3 4 8 2 1 2 3 INDECENT LIBERTIES 3 0 23 16 20 27 17 8 10 11 RAPE/CHILD 1 0 9 10 13 13 23 28 35 39 RUNAWAY 31 24 337 347 397 530 510 490 440 369 SEX OTHER 7 4 60 36 46 38 56 215 211 179 STALKING 2 1 15 21 21 24 19 18 15 21 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 70 39 499 364 440 424 341 215 175 142 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 144 96 1239 1064 1271 1370 1294 1387 1271 1,108 TOTAL ITF 28 22 284 264 316 430 521 542 671 838 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 275 222 2614 2918 3525 3957 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,816 1,744 17,745 18,057 21,454 21,723 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,465 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC X2011 - -2012 X2013 -- 2014 4500 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -o- 2011 2012 -0- 2013 -6-2014 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC - 0 2011 - 2012 -0- 2013 -2014 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Spokane Valley Person Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -o- 2011 2012 2013 -6-2014 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Spokane Valley Property Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2011 - 2012 2013 -6-2014 • • VW A Ir /• A jiewr•-iw / • • • • •--- • JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 2011 - 2012 2013 -6-2014 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -o- 2011 2012 -0- 2013 -6-2014 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Spokane Valley Sex Crimes JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -o- 2011 2012 -0- 2013 -6-2014 • •, I 1. IV wA • • , I • JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC -o- 2011 2012 -0- 2013 -6-2014 9 �� -rick EAEE_ lyr MEM 1111 .w: 0 lid KidM SFai •rounds Broac -. SOFA 10OIME iSEC'I L .0111 Issas ==w- aysu-- :��- b s MaggiiIMPR isiMMMEN raiMpLWa ta lit ralatai is MAE 'F9 Q� °sP 54 h 7 Imo, 9th n eIIiii i mum s.gs pisspin ", .ate... wpm igd "Wm „amid 1 _ Stolen Vehicles O 0 2 0 3 Low ▪ Medium ▪ H igh 2014 September & October Stolen Vehicle Hotspots 1• u. Ke d.5jlMMENUw� .www rs¢rJu oowminmrz Clement a 5 id Orlamal Glen` 4.wri nor IL 011, gape ibertyLalce . Catald Vista linal 51.11M 8t w\■■waw F aa ww517 =EVAiMi kiVER161 ‘1.111114MAII =M= °wvie Traffic Collisions O 1 O 2 O 3 Low Medium Low ▪ Medium ▪ High ° EI 7th co ay 0 0.5 I Miles I I 1 2014 October Traffic Collision Hotspots Map Produced: 10 Nov 2014 2 � :fir►►�� priEgari II .. iy .I� E—ll 11 M.e ■■ man .— MAO EMILIO= lO=1- —'•aail- ---- .41—!PM— am.Irm _am Lake ri in mmillarhirmalEri- Ell ENNE111M1111 girRIFFEII 'M Ai Illii. LW EFIIMMEImmil 0M.21= %TVS mai OMNI •'k Broadw�_1 r -MI ■ i MEM mg swig= WWI& AMEN LEMINFEilidlii ,,.• rE7C.-1• 4 4nor nesse 11� VM C7 45 0 YQ V 5 0 EI Y E\k 0 �d¢e Ste 0 st Residential Burglaries 0 0 2 Low ▪ Medium ▪ High 0 0.5 I Miles I i 1 2014 October Residential Burglary Hotspots Map Produced: 10 Nov 2014 m,m1 I ii ,M __.. muMN221P41 IN nagliEmnPgPPG immulge Prim_ Lake its rt )10.0.46i6.• oinimumen !fa � �� Iley !W'riw NEE ownTha r •& _ mum. -m- AL V— 1L— 41MMIVa 011'V EMIR W 4011L owls 45 1 st d 0 C7 Commercial Burglaries 0 1 O 2 O 3 0 Y 0 0.5 I Miles I 1 I Ste 2014 October Commercial Burglary Hotspots 4 Map Produced: 10 Nov 2014 th nesse Low Medium High �1[C`©\ �i MAIMED mo' r `' `.►'��' /` 'dam mon i �IIwIII'TI., Lake f MAIM�f�PJii:ham-riyiril F7L�lu �ea INS�to MINIM �11.. roroamores tiorm C7 ValbTLIVL 10 7 44%4%4 llk • Ery ` ; ram 1iJIIIItZJ1IiiII' isI•S! \�■�mil� 7Awirallkwarm WriVZ !JI1u "�' y%I • Mir `� �� E�el�' Jnr '� P' 3 Mug, I LIMON .�r-fir. °� 45 ' �� r' nes Corkery 411t1. �`'� 5�Och v Tt a EI Vehicle Prowling o O 2 O 3 O 4 Low ▪ Medium ▪ H igh 0 0.5 I Miles I i 1 2014 October Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Map Produced: 10 Nov 2014 2014 October INCIDENTS BY CITIES (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) 11/13/2014 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS 14 247 241 15 13 2 17 173 79 10 3,351 10 594 4,871 6 9,643 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 11 17 131 4 6 1 10 99 26 3 998 4 527 1,802 6 3,645 DRUG SELF INT (PATROL) 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 5 2 0 11 TRAFFIC STOPS 2 6 32 0 0 0 2 29 11 1 446 2 250 904 3 1,688 TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST/CIT/IN) 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 11 5 0 203 0 92 393 0 715 TS (WARRANTS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 19 0 35 CALLS FOR SERVICE 3 230 110 11 7 1 7 74 53 7 2,353 6 67 3,069 0 5,998 ALARMS 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 3 2 0 89 1 0 90 0 190 ACCIDENTS 0 10 5 1 0 0 0 5 8 0 167 1 14 187 0 398 ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 16 0 23 DRUG CALLS 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 15 0 1 40 0 60 DV 6 2 9 0 2 0 1 9 5 2 126 2 3 168 0 335 DUI 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 80 0 2 79 0 166 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 18 0 24 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 0 8 22 0 4 0 0 15 9 0 375 1 24 653 0 1,111 VEHICLE RECOVERED 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 3 22 0 42 911 ABANDON LINE 0 119 12 8 1 0 1 8 2 1 173 0 11 243 0 579 SHOPLIFTING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 44 0 46 ALL ARRESTS (ARREST/CIT/IN) 0 1 19 1 0 0 2 21 10 3 310 1 114 650 0 1,132 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 0 0 19 0 2 0 0 8 18 0 442 0 5 587 0 1,081 11/13/2014 * 2014 OCTOBER CRIMES BY CITIES (Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) 11/13/2014 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV Total BURGLARY 4 1 2 0 0 0 4 2 2 0 79 0 3 78 0 175 FORGERY 0 0 2 0 0 0 4 1 3 0 34 0 4 57 0 105 MAL MISCHIEF 7 0 6 0 2 0 0 4 3 3 131 0 4 130 0 290 NON -CRIMINAL 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 0 7 0 1 12 0 25 PROP OTHER 26 3 8 1 0 0 14 4 3 1 50 0 21 129 0 260 RCRVD VEH 3 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 29 0 1 42 0 78 STL VEH 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 36 0 0 48 0 87 THEFT 30 0 5 0 1 0 6 1 9 0 149 0 1 279 0 481 VEH OTHER 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 1 25 0 56 VEH PROWL 2 0 6 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 74 0 1 91 0 177 il DI IMI III WI KI] WI DI :1I II'& 1 I I * 73 4 32 1 4 0 33 15 22 4 618 0 37 891 0 1,734 ASSAULT 3 1 8 0 0 0 0 4 2 2 55 1 2 88 0 166 DOA/SUICIDE 5 0 1 0 0 0 3 3 0 1 25 0 0 17 0 55 DV 5 1 2 0 1 0 1 4 1 0 33 0 1 46 0 95 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KIDNAP 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 5 0 10 MENTAL 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 19 0 0 21 0 46 MP 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0 0 12 0 19 PERS OTHER 20 0 8 0 1 0 11 8 6 2 186 1 20 264 0 527 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 13 0 15 TEL -HARASS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 1 12 0 24 0 to 11:l no UM MN NI Id 134.` 37 2 22 0 2 0 15 21 11 6 336 2 25 478 0 957 ADULT RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 8 0 14 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 8 CUST INTFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 6 0 0 15 0 24 SEXREGISF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 9 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 RUNAWAY 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 32 0 0 31 0 69 SEX OTHER 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 7 0 15 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 5 SUSP PERSON 9 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 0 0 46 0 4 70 0 136 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 10 0 1 0 1 0 9 4 3 0 102 0 9 144 0 283 TOTAL ITF 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 9 0 5 28 0 49 TOTAL TRAFFIC 13 0 6 0 0 0 8 3 7 3 143 0 58 275 0 516 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 135 6 63 1 7 0 67 44 43 13 1,208 2 134 1,816 0 3,539 11/13/2014 SpUk ine 1 .� Val ley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT October 2014 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Name Contractor Contract Total % of Expended as Contract Amount of 10/31/14 Expended w a 40 Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $1,350,517.09 98.82% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $430,198.25 87.76% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $189,656.11 99.82% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $43,417.00 31.01% Landscaping Ace Landscaping $82,902.72 $64,479.87 77.78% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $7,148.15 71.48% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $51,031.56 85.05% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00 $193,522.33** 73.03% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $362,154.62** 57.30% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00* $12,976.00 64.88% * Budget estimates ** Does not include October 2014 Citizen Requests for Public Works 70 60 !!! Ln0 50 w a 40 w cc 30 w N 20 u 10 0 — ota Citizen Requests: Public Works Misc. PW Requests Dead Animal Removal Roadway Hazard Pothole Requests Sign & Signal Requests Storm Drainage/ Erosion Traffic Requests ■ Submitted 64 5 23 4 5 14 6 7 ■ In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • Resolved 64 5 23 4 5 14 6 7 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.qov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for October 2014: • Poe Asphalt Maintenance Contract — Poe completed small patches, repaired sinkholes at three locations, adjusted and repaved around various manholes. Stormwater work and sidewalk panels at various locations were also repaired and replaced. • AAA Sweeping vectored 174 catchbasins and cleaned the curb inlets along Sullivan, Indiana Mission, Marietta and Euclid. 19.15 tons of material was removed from those structures. • AAA Sweeping operated 45 hours performing monthly maintenance arterial sweeping. • The Geiger crew cut dryland grass areas for 17 work days and removed 4,820 lbs. of litter from our arterial roadways. • Our Dead Animal control officer removed 16 deer and 2 small rodents from the City's right of way. STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for October 2014: • Awarded Package #2 of the Stormwater Utility Small Works Projects and executed an agreement with Inland Asphalt Company. A porous asphalt mix design will be placed over shoulder/edge drains in three locations including Adams, from Trent to Wellesley; Wellesley along the frontage with East Valley High School; and the Northeast corner of Bowdish and 24th. • Continued work on documents and specifications for new bid for street sweeping services. • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, and worked on Grant Applications for Ecology (see below). *Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS oka ne .0.0 Val ley Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction October -2014 Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA - BR 06/27/14 07/18/14 100 2 09/30/16 $ 15,833,333 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA - CMAQ 01/02/15 01/23/15 90 0 07/15/15 $ 2,002,350 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) &Grace Ave. Int Safety HSIP 03/06/15 03/27/15 35 0 10/31/15 $ 671,050 0206 2015 CDBG Sidewalk Project CDBG 01/09/15 01/30/15 3 0 06/30/15 $ 287,094 0210 Alcazar Driveway Reconstruction COSV 09/17/14 10/02/14 100 0 11/30/14 $ 7,000 Street Preservation Projects 0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley & Wellesley COSV 03/06/15 03/27/15 0 0 07/30/15 $ 551,714 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06-3 FHWA - CMAQ 11/07/14 12/05/14 99 0 08/15/15 $ 1,650,360 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 10/31/14 11/17/14 10 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 Stormwater Projects 0173 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Dept of Ecology 12/27/13 01/30/14 99 98 12/01/14 $ 1,209,478 Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk InfilI 0176 ApplewayTrail - Earthwork 0176 ApplewayTrail - Paving FHWA -CMAQ 08/08/14 08/29/14 100 90 06/30/15 $ 1,139,955 COSV 07/25/14 08/08/14 100 99 11/15/14 $ 187,000 COSV 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 32 05/30/15 $ 1,400,000 $ 25,413,914 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open % Complete Construction Project # Design & Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA - BR 06/27/14 07/18/14 100 2 09/30/16 $ 15,833,333 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA - CMAQ 01/02/15 01/23/15 90 0 07/15/15 $ 2,002,350 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) &Grace Ave. Int Safety HSIP 03/06/15 03/27/15 35 0 10/31/15 $ 671,050 0206 2015 CDBG Sidewalk Project CDBG 01/09/15 01/30/15 3 0 06/30/15 $ 287,094 0210 Alcazar Driveway Reconstruction COSV 09/17/14 10/02/14 100 0 11/30/14 $ 7,000 Street Preservation Projects 0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley & Wellesley COSV 03/06/15 03/27/15 0 0 07/30/15 $ 551,714 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06-3 FHWA - CMAQ 11/07/14 12/05/14 99 0 08/15/15 $ 1,650,360 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 10/31/14 11/17/14 10 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 Stormwater Projects 0173 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility Dept of Ecology 12/27/13 01/30/14 99 98 12/01/14 $ 1,209,478 Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk InfilI 0176 ApplewayTrail - Earthwork 0176 ApplewayTrail - Paving FHWA -CMAQ 08/08/14 08/29/14 100 90 06/30/15 $ 1,139,955 COSV 07/25/14 08/08/14 100 99 11/15/14 $ 187,000 COSV 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 32 05/30/15 $ 1,400,000 $ 25,413,914 Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker FHWA - STP(U) 06/30/15 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 11/30/14 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mul Ian FHWA - STP(U) 08/31/15 0201 ITS Infill Project - Phase 1 FHWA - CMAQ 01/01/15 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSV 06/01/15 Street Preservation Projects 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/01/15 5 80 90 5 2 $ 517,919 $ 175,260 $ 276,301 $ 327,562 $ 51,619 10 $ 1,156, 500 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA - CMAQ 11/30/14 95 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 12/30/14 75 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study Dept of Ecology 02/28/15 30 $ 300,000 0197 Broadway, Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 30 $ 60,000 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 20 $ 20,000 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 33 $ 20,000 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 36 $ 20,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley -Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/15 5 $ 745,000 $ 4,119,872 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Complete Open % Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker FHWA - STP(U) 06/30/15 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 11/30/14 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mul Ian FHWA - STP(U) 08/31/15 0201 ITS Infill Project - Phase 1 FHWA - CMAQ 01/01/15 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSV 06/01/15 Street Preservation Projects 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/01/15 5 80 90 5 2 $ 517,919 $ 175,260 $ 276,301 $ 327,562 $ 51,619 10 $ 1,156, 500 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA - CMAQ 11/30/14 95 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 12/30/14 75 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study Dept of Ecology 02/28/15 30 $ 300,000 0197 Broadway, Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 30 $ 60,000 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 20 $ 20,000 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 33 $ 20,000 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion Dept of Ecology 12/31/14 36 $ 20,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley -Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/15 5 $ 745,000 $ 4,119,872 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 Capital Programs - Grants Department of Ecology Stormwater Grants Stormwater and Capital Programs scoped projects that would make good candidates for the upcoming "Fiscal Year 2016 — Water Quality Financial Assistance" grant program. The candidate list was presented to the City Council on October 21, 2014 and staff was directed to submit grants for 5 projects: • Drywell Retrofits with Pavement Preservation 2015-2017 • Sprague, University to Park Stormwater Improvements • 2015-2017 Outfall Elimination • Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility, Phase III • Sweeping Program Effectiveness Study and Pilot Project Applications were due November 7, 2014. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) Planning and Capital Programs staff narrowed the project selection down to one candidate that best matches grant criteria of 2015 CDBG program. On October 14, 2014 Planning presented the "Seth Woodard Elementary Sidewalk Improvement" project to the City Council and afterwards a public hearing was held. The City Council directed staff to complete the application for the project. Applications were due November 10, 2014. 2014 TIP — Amendment #2 Capital Programs presented the City Council the second amended 2014 TIP to add the "Sullivan Preservation Project — SR290 to Wellesley" project. The City is teaming with WSDOT to include lighting upgrades and pavement preservation on Sullivan Road. In 2015, WSDOT will construct the "SR 290/Sullivan Rd to Idaho State Line" paving project and the City has the opportunity to include its work on this contract to obtain a lower contract price to complete the work. A public hearing was held on October 14, 2014 and afterwards the City Council passed Resolution 14-010 to adopt the amendment. TRAFFIC Sullivan Road Study The final TAC meeting occurred in October, with the distribution of a Draft Report to TAC members for review and comments. The Final Report incorporating comments received will be prepared in November. University Overpass Study Staff is continuing to coordinate with the consultant on the University Overpass study. Staff has provided comments on the Draft Report, which was distributed to TAC members for review and comment. The final TAC meeting will be held in early November. Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering. *Information in bold indicates updates 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 2, 2014 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: El ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade Project #0060 — 1-90 to Trent Ave GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: (1) September 12, 2006; Council approval of federal grant application for the Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade project, (2) Adopted the 2007-2012, 2008-2013, 2009-2014, 2010-2015, 2011-2016, 2012-2017, 2013-2018 and 2014-2019 Six Year TIPs which included the Argonne Road Corridor Improvements; (3) February 16, 2010; Info RCA on upcoming 2010 Public Works Project Council Actions; (4) Info RCA on consultant Supplemental Agreement #3, July 5, 2011; (5) Approval of consultant Supplemental Agreement #3 on July 12, 2011; (6) Passage of Ordinance 13-020, authorizing acquisition of land under condemnation authority on December 17, 2013. BACKGROUND: This project will provide improvements to the traffic signals at the Argonne/Knox and Argonne/Montgomery intersections. The project will also add a northbound right turn lane on Argonne Rd at Montgomery Ave to improve traffic flow and reduce congestion. The City received a federal grant covering 86.5% of the cost of the project, up to $1,116,400. The length of time required from grant application to construction (8 years) has resulted in increased project costs. The current project estimate is $1.45 million, an increase of approximately $159,000 from the original estimate at the time of grant application. The project also includes additive bid schedules (related additional work requested if bids received are within the project budget). This additional work includes: reconstruction of the failed pavement within the Argonne/Knox intersection and replacement of a structurally deficient traffic signal pole at the northwest corner of the Argonne/Montgomery intersection. These additive schedules are not part of the original grant request and are not eligible for grant reimbursement. The current estimate for these two additional items is approximately $200,000. The project was advertised on November 7, 2014, and bids are scheduled to be opened on December 5, 2014. After opening bids and tabulating the results, staff will present the results at the Tuesday, December 9, 2014 Council meeting for award of the contract to the lowest responsive responsible bidder. OPTIONS: Information only. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The grant -eligible work is estimated at $1,449,300. The local match for this work is $333,000. The additional non -grant eligible work is estimated at $200,000. REET funds (Fund 301) will pay for all local match and non -grant eligible work. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E., Senior Capital Projects Engineer, Eric Guth, P.E., Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: None