1984, 05-25 Code Violation InvestigationPUILDING/SAFETY CODE VIOLATION INVESTIGATIO
ADDRESS: �% tPfS�/lam
TYPE: „Sel6cie /
NATURE: t c74{
CODE.SECTION:
OWNER: ,„„\ istvl c)(),
O N R .ADDRESS: 77 1-12/.q —; pp 1
FILE . N O : '7( i
DATE .RECE1VED:
DATE .RESOLVED:
ZIP: 992/R
PARCEL . NO : /s/6L`f3' 0 03 SIZE: 2'X./ot ZONE: A--
COMP.PLAN. 6/d4a.4
INVESTIGATOR: i'Z0`774.1..› LAST .INSPECT .DATE :
(RESOLVED BY:)
PROSECUTOR: — COURT ORDER:DEAD: COMPLIANCE:
SUMMARY .REMARKS1 : SEEF7tE-s: o075-/3' /.2 S"-,310
SUMMARY.REMARKS2:
SUMMARY.REMARKS3:
gcCktc%.. c /c4/g1
S'-/:
gV
-
501P /lh7c, •s1,c-e ((/4:) 14 77,D
l2c{c‘�{� 0 , cf<d 1/f m•,(1..vi cJ �.� c /�'
lc N 41// 3C
274.7
G0, t
C7((.N" 111-4,). 01yvy/C -
5e-114Ce Z4., Nec.-{' SCI C-
'LV
GCO v ..i I! sr' Ktc�t.
l J/-.- /�u.�
c'*�c . ohl.r/�-Lr
u r t—c�11uc .
e tel 1k
J/ 1/
11y
Y\ e/lc (.ar.
vwSz. / / 7e 1
—31 (i ec
42 f7,4_
/e
/-4
August 14, 1984
Atten. Tom Davis
Attorney Rob Arkills
Sirs;
In reference to your July 3, 1984 letter (photo copy included)
I have talked to Jim Manson and to Steve Horobiowski to try to get
some relief from this senseless, ruthless, vicious, counter pro-
rluctive. Attack.
My wife decided to comply with your request for us to pay for
the Zone change paper work #1 she found that she had to pay the plan-
ning dept. $310.00 for the paper work that could have and should have
been done as an alternate Mobile Home Park Zone when I was denied
a Restricted Industrial Zone aprox 3 years ago.
#2. She had to pay the engineering dept. $200.00 to confirm that
existing blacktop road is 40 ft. wide instead of the required 30 ft.
#3. She did pay the sewer dept. $15.00 for them to confirm that
I had already sewage capacity for twice their requirements. This
was preplanned, installed and inspected when the other 58 spaces
were built.
#4 These 2 lots have more square ft. than any other single wide
lot in the park.
#5. The State already inspected the Electrical.
Rather than me being subjected to the threat of the fine and rIr the
90 days in Jail the 2 tenants have agreed to accept a lot farther
away from Ella St. as there is considerable Traffic on Ella.
#6. The fees to the Title Co.
#7. Fees for Registered letters.
Knowing that these lots are properly Built and have been inspected
and there have be NO complaints about the lots. Tons Davis's
complaint was about a 9X10 shed that was on the back property line
"perfectly legeal".
I am asking that these lots be allowed to stay with out all the
red tape that would change nothing except a gross waste of time and
money (ours and the Countys). I feel it grossly unfair if you force
me to give our tennants eviction notices in lu of re-zoneing.
Sincerely
'!
Jim Olinger
•
.-r-- N
\ • \
•
,.. •
4- )r:2
.....--------------.---..
".
1 • 1)..,
-. 614-11'1C...,"::::1 ,IC71:/:.:,:::::1,.. ;1‘; I -: 4
,•-\2t,,,.W`-•''..."r
r) --\ 4 61/44'' -n -kc-` 4'. Ov'35.-i'\ /1 7.1\ ''' -.',;,e-\ p•- A:, ifr''.‘•,--44-'>,..6'''''''''—v-: ri'''''—'.
e , ‘5:,-; .6"? ('''' , \ , c.4v-V1_, ,, 7 .• 1 '._„ ,
\•
•';',.1;,'` • e,-,61,-, -'-'
g -1)-f1, or
.•,-----''' '''''''
epoi•CIJ4:0 \...rt:\,e,.0"`; ,
'co , 4..... ,,,v, —
... - 2.-:..2.1.0.‘ :.
, , )•- ___--,,,
, , riGt• '"'":'14i °'-r''
(-20 ' ( '' '''(2‘.'
f..4., . 1 ,...., _...........-......... ..
lit
JGly 3, 1984
Mr. Jim Olinger
North 4912 Sipple
Spokane, WA 99206
Dear Mr. Olinger:
Sp ka11c Councv
department of building & safety
JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR
CERTIFIED - RECEIPT REQUESTED
As you are aware from our discussion on June 20, 1984, this
office received reports regarding the location of a utility storage
building in violation of the side yard setback requirement.
Pursuant to Section 4.05. 110 (b0(2) of the county zoning ordinance, a
setback of five (5) feet shall be maintained in the front seventy (70)
feet of the lot. There is no side yard required 70 feet or more from
the front property line.
Please be advised that Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code
does not require building permits for one-story detached accessory
structures used as tool and storage sheds provided that projected
roof area does not exceed 120 square feet. However, such structures
are required to comply with all yard setback requirements.
Upon field investigation of this matter, it was found that two
(2) single wide mobile homes have been placed on property located at
North 605 and 615 Ella, respectively. These properties are zone
Agricultural Suburban.
Pursuant to Section 4.05.040(a) of the zoning code, only one
single family dwelling is permitted on a single lot. Further,
Section 4.05.100 prohibits single wide mobile homes. Building
permits numbered 83A-5874 and 83A-5872 were issued to you on June 28,
1983, for one double wide mobile home on each lot.
It is the intent of this letter to advise you of an apparent
zoning violation and to request compliance within a suitable time
frame. Accordingly, we are of the opinion that since you have now
been informed of the requirements of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, a period of 30 days, beginning with your receipt of this
letter, should be sufficient time in which to bring your property
into compliance by removing the two single wide mobile homes from tax
parcels 18543-0303 and 18543-0304.
NORTH 811 1EFFERSON
• SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260•0050 • TELEPHONE (509) 456-3675
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Jim Olinger
July 3, 1984
As an alternative you may request through the County Planning
Department a rezone to expand your park to include the two parcels
mentioned above. However, a valid application will need to oe
submitted and accepted by the County Planning Department within the
specified time period stated herein.
If these matters are not taken care of within the previously
mentioned 30 days, we will be unable to grant any further extensions
of time and will have no choice but to forward this case to the
Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney's Office for appropriate legal
action. A violation of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance is a
criminal offense and does carry a pena l ty of, "...imprisonment i n the
County jail for a maximum term fixed by the court of not more than
ninety (90) days or by a fine in an amount fixed by the court of not
more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), or both such imprisonment
and fine."
Please be advised that this is not a matter that wi l 1 go away if
ignored. I am sure it is important to you, as it is to me, that we
resolve this situation quickly.
Sincerel
t/ /-`
Thomas L. Davis
Zoning Investigator
gw
ces+urcee► .
SWUM
S.33A0140i3 171
vp
35nY)39 H3A1130 01 319VNn "1
.. - - .
(oit1{bu x k'O) S S3Nti0V '9
;f,�ISVw1S
1"
! c� Atirwi 0 i0 31W .S
\-....y:4451[] °°_°"•PP11❑ 3 fl1VNB1S ;
WOW PSP OPIA N1 P 1
(IutOi i . us pto P • i l s sA* y)
5081705
H38wON 31311W
1tY1 S59Hd1C30
0030 013111
03Ut1SNl 0 ' 030151930D
33IAH3S 30 34A1 'P
90266 6'h1 auBxo•
ajddTS ZT6f, u;ioK
(Z £ Z T O P 8) '1923ZIQ0il 310a
:at m 1
( J_Jwum,
waspewiouv34.444Ammusiuto
AN3A1130 031OIHIS3H O 2
I+WNP W MVP, Pug 'RMP 'uO • *O IS ❑
Y"- Paar1pP RMP Palm -VA q AM r[
Iwo Igaip) PRcwlbu N aWM a%winn aid 'l
(833i 101 1113011.11011 111ISNo9)
•oapAuu uo Weft
..01 Ntin13H.. ow uI mum Jrwa ow
.0 Put •c 'z '1 Mall SvId=3 :MOS • '
1
1-
d
0
z
ti