The URL can be used to link to this page

2015, 01-06 Study Session AMENDED AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION FORMAT Tuesday,January 6, 2015 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue,First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL ACTION ITEMS: 1.Mayor Grafos Planning Commission Appointments Motion Consideration [public comments] 2.Mayor Grafos Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Appointments Motion Consideration [public comments] 3.John Hohman Public Participation Plan Motion Consideration [public comments] 3a.Mike Jackson Delegation of Authority to City Manager Motion Consideration NON-ACTION ITEMS: 4.Mike Stone YMCA Contract Update Discussion/Information 5. Cary Driskell, Code Enforcement Lien Authority Discussion/Information Mike Jackson (Legislative Agenda) 6. Eric Guth Broadway Avenue Storm Drain Retrofits Discussion/Information 7.Mayor Grafos Advance Agenda Discussion/Information 8. Information Only: (will not be reported or discussed): a. Commute Trip Reduction Plan Update c. Department Monthly Reports b. Response to Public Comments d. Street Sweeping Contract 9.Mayor Grafos Council Comments Discussion/Information 10.Mike Jackson City Manager Comments Discussion/Information ADJOURN Note: Unless otherwise noted above,there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However,Council always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City of Spokane Valley Council,the Council reserves the right to take"action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the agenda. The term "action"means to deliberate, discuss,review,consider,evaluate,or make a collective positive or negative decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical,hearing,or other impairments,please contact the City Clerk at(509)921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Study Session Agenda January 6,2015 Page 1 of 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6,2015 Department Director Approval: n Check all that apply: n consent n old business ® new business n public hearing n information n admin. report n pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mayoral Appointments: Planning Commissioners GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code 18.10; RCW 67.28 BACKGROUND: Two Planning Commissioners'terms expire December 31,2014: Michael Phillips and Steven Neill. Two Planning Commissioners' have also resigned effective December 31, 2014, with one year remaining of their three-year original appointment. According to SVMC 18.10,"members of the Planning Commission shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four members of the City Council. Planning Commissioners shall be selected without respect to political affiliations, and shall serve without compensation. The Mayor, when considering appointments, shall attempt to select residents who represent various interests and locations within the City. . . . . The Planning Commission shall consist of seven members. All members shall reside within the City. Terms shall be for a three-year period, and shall expire on the thirty-first day of December." A vacancy announcement was posted on the City's webpage, and was published several times in the Spokesman Review and in the Valley News Herald. The deadline to submit an application was 4:00 p.m. Monday, December 15, 2014; and once the deadline passed, copies of all applications were distributed to each Councilmember. Mayor Grafos will announce his nominations. OPTIONS: Confirm the Mayor's nominations or choose not to confirm some or all nominations. If the motion to confirm does not pass,Mayor Grafos may make other nominations. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the following Mayoral appointments to the Planning Commission: and to the Planning Commission for three-year terms beginning January 1, 2015; and and to the Planning Commission for a one- year term beginning January 1,2015. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: n/a STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Grafos ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission Applications ane c/Crivff C) oft. {f 4, , 6,4 Application Form for k44, Committees/Boards/Commissions c(oik ,4Preiturn Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone: 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: Spokane Valley Planning Commission Applicant's name (please print): Carol Ann Christnacht tjaatlY Applicant's Residence Address: 11813 E. 37th Spokane u 99206 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email: cslodge@comcast.net Home Phone: 509-924-2216 Work Phone: Cell Phone: 509-290-1979 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 24 years NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female�x Male M U.S. Citizen? yes Wa. State Registered voter? yes EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: Hill International Inc. Position Held: Administrative Dates of Employment: 2014 to Present Address: 818 West Riverside Avenue,Suite 350 Phone: 509-747-8031 Previous Employer: Good Samaritan Society Position Held: Leisure Services Director Dates of Employment: 2007 to 2014 Address: 17121 East 8th Avenue Phone: 509-924-6161 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: Helena High School Diploma: Yes [rn No City/State Address Helena,Montana 59601 College/University: Eastern Washington University Degree Earned: BA Public Recreation with an emphasis City/State Address: Cheney,WA Community Education and Developmen College/University: Lewis and Clark College Degree Earned: Masters in Public Administration with an City/State Address: Lake Oswego,Oregon emphasis in Community Involvement COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) pokane RegignaII Health ()istrii Certified Cornmunitty Health Worker, Greater Spokane Incorporated K-12 Education Committee, Health Care Committee, Junior League of Spokane Committee Chair for the YWCA Homeless Program. I worked with the Remiss Neighborhood in developing a strategic plan for the community. Worked with ARC of Spokane and other Community Members in developing an awareness to the need of making our community truly handicap accessible. VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: Ronald McDonald House, Spokane Valley Meals on Wheels, St.John Vianney Catholic Church, YMCA Partners in Youth, CVSD Parent Volunteer, Redeemer Lutheran Church,Junior League of Spokane, Habitat for Humanity,Big Brothers and Big Sisters of Spokane County, Lutherhaven,Team in Training,American Cancer Society Relay for Life, Ronald McDonald House, Sacred Heart Children's Hospital. SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: Grant Writer,Organizational Skills,Team Building, Program Development American Sign Language Avid Bike Rider, Hiker,Tennis Player PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMI T-1'EES, OR COMMISSIONS: Pierce County Human Rights Commission Tacoma,Washington Committee Name City/State GSI K-12 Education and Healthcare Committee Spokane,WA Committee Name City/State MAS(Marketing Associates of Spokane) Spokane,WA Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? I can contribute an open mind, enthusiasm, and courage to be progressive in discussing growth in the Spokane Valley. I have a strong background in Community Development and Strategic Planning. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? I have a willingness to assist a team in creating a community that is"user"friendly in all areas. I am well connected in the community,a visionary, as well as, a team player. Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? NO 1 � hi Signature 'Today's Date Carol Ann Christnacht 11813 C. 37th esledge@comcast.net comcast.net 509-924-2216(Home) Spok`rrre, WA 99206 509-290-1979(Cell) ',why CAREER OBJ Ec rIVE I desire a position in the business/professional field that utilizes my strong management, organizational, and communication skills while providing challenging opportunities. WORK iIISTor4V Program Developer, Fundraising Coordinator, and Grant Writer/Manager Various Institutions, Spokane and Spokane Valley, WA 1992 to Present •.• Develop programs to cultivate, solicit and recognize donors; establish effective long-term relationships with essential executives, volunteers and donors resulting in dramatically increased total giving and participation •'• Organize,develop and write strategic long-range plans,educational programs, and support groups •. Create,write, design and manage production of marketing materials, including training agendas, manuals, direct mail packages and awards •:• Primary Contracts include: City of Spokane, Lutherhaven, Redeemer Lutheran Church,and Big Brothers/Big Sisters of Spokane County + Write successful grant applications Office Administrator Hill international, Inc., Spokane, WA 2014 to Present •:• Responsible for all aspects of maintaining and operating office for construction risk management business in Spokane •:• Proofing and revision of proposal requests, contracts,marketing, data entry, and general clerical duties Leisure Services Director Good Samaritan Society, Spokane Valley, WA 2007 to 2014 • Create and coordinate special events, educational programs, and volunteer socials ❖ Generate marketing materials for residents and community events •' Develop support groups for residents and families + Recruit and manage volunteers •: Develop and implement fitness, wellness and educational programs Tennis Coach, Junior Varsity University High School, Spokane Valley, WA 2004 to Present + Provide instruction and communicate to high school youth + Organize game schedules + Manage equipment, uniforms, and supplies + Coordinate with varsity coach, other high school coaches, and referees •i• Assist at summer camps Swim Instructor/Private Business Owner Self-Employed, Spokane Valley, WA 1995 to Present •:• Train and supervise instructors, teach area youths and adults to swim, and implement water fitness programs for active and fragile adults s• Create and coordinate swim schedules + Manage fees, finances, and payroll Wellness Coordinator Rockwood Retirement Community at Hawthorne, Spokane, WA 2006 to 2007 + Developed and implemented fitness and wellness programs •> Recruited and managed volunteers Volunteer Accessibility 4 All Spokane Present •3 Media Networking Committee Pediatrics, Sacred Heart Medical Center, Spokane, WA and 1995- 1996 Chester Elementary, Spokane Valley, WA «• Provided care for sick and disadvantaged children and their families •:• Communicated with supervisors Contract Manager far Spokane Community Mobilization Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Council, Spokane, WA 1992-1993 • Reviewed and managed grant applications •:• Communicated with state and local government agencies ❖ Effectively worked with the Volunteer Board of Directors Community Program Developer II Department of Emergency Management, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 1990-1992 • Reviewed government policies •: Implemented FEMA regulations Community Ombudsman Program Developer Center for Voluntary Action, State of Washington, Olympia, WA 1989-1990 •:• Worked with Washington State Ombudsman Program to develop/coordinate activities for Senior Citizens on a state-wide basis •: Recruited and Managed volunteers + Created a volunteer training manual Co►n►r►unity Education Coordinator American Red Cross, Spokane, WA 1988-1989 + Developed educational programs •;• Recruited volunteers Youth Recreation Coordinator West Seattle YMCA, Seattle, WA 1986-1988 :, Organized youth activities and programs utilizing four-year high school letters in tennis and swimming • Trained and Supervised staff EDUCATION Musters of Public Administration Bachelor of Arts, Public Recreation Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA CERTIFICATIONS AND COMMUNITY ACT'IVI'TY Spokane Regional Health District, Certified Community Health Worker, 2014 Red Cross Certified Swim Instructor, CPR and First Aid Greater Spokane Incorporated, K-12 Education Committee Spokane Valley Meals on Wheels Ronald McDonald House St. John Vianney Catholic Church Spokane Junior League SKIC.1.s AND ABILITIES •:* Software Knowledge •:• Grant Writing •:* (MS Word, Excel, Publisher, PowerPoint) •:• Fundraising ❖ Communications-- Oral and Written .• Team Building •:• Organizational Skills •+• Marketing/Media Relations • Negotiations •:* Energetic and Enthusiastic ❖ American Sign Language First Aid/CPR References Available Upon Request cars car ' q 3P 0 ,C ! 4;010a.1 . Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSiTION APPLYING FOR: tL/L A,/f ,4/ /i/ t- (7 Ct!`'''' 01)s 3J[)/-1 Applicant's name (please print): /-/'L %I %1 (" �/c r A/ t// Applicant's Residence Address: C'/ :. 2-7" tY- - /9 G C//lc• '// 99(k Street City Zip Coda Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): Street _ City Zip Code Applicant's Email: Home Phone: �`�? YZ.�, sYSt9/.1 Work Phone: Cell Phone: 9Y3 �- Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: _3 c/ Y6- NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. [ Gender: Female Male M. U.S. Citizen? "i� /5 Wa. State Registered voter? e—J' EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: C t"rI1 LC. '5 4'4 ,C S [ /L"/P, Position Held: f' L 1$ates of Employment: MY.:c / '/ C.7" ei/O Address: Phone: Previous Employer: (:.I`=- V)4 L /4-G e: /2[L_ %, '7 £/C Position Held: 7—FX c26,J°L Dates of Employrnent: '- /1f/ ["/ Address: Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: / /e/ -.) /I/6 __ Diploma: Yes NI No Q j City/State Address _ - a . '' 0/4- , College/University: '1/i T c'G�.r` /C 461 "r Ti/✓, ' Degree Earned: gig City/State Address: _ S , ' .�_//j A-/Y4-- u/4, College/University: /�✓- C 'V C/ .-/1_2,7" Degree Earned: r''`1' City/State Address: /1---X` /Y COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) 9. C 0", , , `Ki ',i/l,c AO k40 69,r (14-/-,;e---,e,/`5�l/ 1. A-P". 71i /�'v'Y 4C'42 AWL-4777;e P2r'`.5 f`,' ��/�Yt. , o ' -d,..r''C,t': ' eri ...45> c_ ',5"/`169i/i -18 L s' J 5/44_5;717/2/ 6-5:- , }4.1.4 1f 4co,45/ .env" ,---.5,:01(0-A/2-,' VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: ,y . 6' C0 --- v/ 9e' 5/PY ,efe SPECIAL SIULLS/ENTERESTS: eef2-6, Le CP /c. PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES,OR COMMISSIONS: W14 . T- ;7 :"-A1- ', /‘--w.ic Committee Name City/State + Y Committee Name City/State 4- Z-z__e' 6 e 5 a r'//r`G0/Yf` � c�J.' . / .. Z.-7Z > L ', `'v Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? 62 /�o2C-1 b71149-- c/9-44:7- era, g /;7 Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? heft-LI N6 7Z? i-AYWtV L/$r ` f k'V h 65— /*/ 14/ 6-i/0 Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? /e t= _,---- -7/ ..____:./.---- z.."/"" 77 .7„-------- - ,--___ ,e,-:"-)e---) /./ /--5/3 SignatureTo ay's D /(6' // MilHe Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E.Sprague Ave.Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: I IC. tf`Y} �t�k='y C' ,s` Applicants name(please print): A I l r`LYY 1 t 01 E J-,c Applicant's Residence Address: \ -7> 1 •D-P 641' AU � v i r,e Oct Street Cit Zip Cbde Applicants Mailing Address(ti different from ResIdence nddress}: .tYnO _ Street City Zip Code Applicants Email: a.I/ci,.1-1 M c tit Qa;t11.wrr Home Phone: (5f i) q D,4-047‘64/ Work Phone: nett fie Cell Phone: wi Y1 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: G1 f2C (7 7 a NOTE:You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards,committees and commissions. Gender FemaleD Male IVArl U.S.Citizen? 'S Wa,State Registered voter? ?S EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: f Present or last employer: 5. ' app I ice*bh ct 4 iRe- ktilr,P 1"4 Position Held: 11 11 Dates of Employment: Address: Phone: Previous Employer: Position Held: Dates of Employment: Address: Phone: EDUCATIONAL.BACKGROUND: High School: Diploma: Yes No M City/State Address - College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address: College/University: _ Degree Earned: City/State Address: COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: `I�-�r L'y't (J/, /^f . ?. i°.„, t n7--S y 2 l-`it - 1 ,,pIr4..,,c -. .. _ GG'/'1 4: (J / PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMI ALES,OR COMMISSIONS: Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? IF43,:k5e ' r-)79 cztlec 1t9 tier Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? 1c\-)e) (Recut,ii? (.4 .. • .,..„,„ .a.,-.4 ,,_ _ , ki Signature Today's Date Resume A1JD i N. deLaub f&s E. 13120 6th Ave., Spokane, WA 99216, (509) 924-0464 OBJECTIVE: To follow my professional Planning career with volunteer work at the level of my ability here in The City of Spokane Valley EDUCATION: • Economic Geography, Oregon State College, 1951 - 1956 (B.S.) • Urban Planning, University of Washington, 1958 - 1959 • Education, Eastern Washington University, 1985 - 1987 SKILLS: • Using Washington Planning Law • Management of people and agencies • Staffing of policy boards • Teaching and public relations • Use of computer applications • Interagency coordination • Public speaking • Meeting management a Written expression RELEVANT EMPLOYMENT July 1988 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 1999 (retired) Planner 2: Responsible for preparing Comprehensive Plans, meeting the public with planning needs, developing computer applications, conducting policy related studies, enforcing the County Zoning Code and a variety of intra and inter office planning tasks. January 1983 PANHANDLE AREA COUNCIL, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho July 1984 Director of Emplo ment and Tr :: Responsible for organizing, planning, and operating JTPA job training programs as part of a comprehensive multi county economic development program; managed an annual budget over $1,000,000; prepared and presented written and spoken reports; prepared for and conducted regular formal meetings; supervised staff; and related duties. September 1980 SPOKANE TRANSIT SYSTEM, Spokane, Washington August 1981 Demonstration Pr ject Manager: Operated a transit marketing demonstration project funded by the U.S. Department of Transportation; negotiated a complex equipment design and purchase; conducted a multimedia advertising campaign; supervised staff and consultants; and effectively involved more than one hundred downtown businesses. January 1978 GRANT LINCOLN ADAMS COUNTY CONFERENCE of December 1978 GOVERNMENTS, Ephrata, Washington. Executive Director; Developed and conducting inter- governmental programs for a 3 county/27 city organization; conducted complex Environmental Impact Statement review, plan and zoning consulting, federal application review and negotiation; and supervised staff. November 1961 WASHINGTON STATE PLANNING & COMMUNITY December 1977 AFFAIRS AGENCY, Regional Planner; Manager Eastern Washington Regional Office. Initiated and supported planning agencies and planning programs throughout Eastern Washington; consulted regarding all phases of planning and planning related activities; conducted formal Annexation Review (now "Boundary Review"), federal project review; and supervised staff. September 1956 KING COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, Seattle, November 1961 WA.,Senior Planner: Manager Current Planning Section - Administered zoning and subdivision regulations; drafted neighborhood and sub-area plans; gathered and presented planning related data and information (i.e., land use and population); conducted related public hearings, and extensive interdepartmental and interagency coordination. July 1962 Member and chairman Tumwater WA Planning September 1964 Commission. This was volunteer work and was in addition to my employment. Personal I am mature, professional, enthusiastic, well Qualities organized, adaptable, cooperative, and skilled at working with elected officials and the public. From: Allan deLaubenfels [mailto:allannde@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2014 1:47 PM To: Chris Bainbridge Subject: Planning Commission Dear Ms. Bainbridge Thank you for meeting with me this noon and explaining the openings in the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. My application form has been completed and scanned and is included below. This form make reference to the complete application, including resume, which you assured me is still on file from the last time I applied for a similar position. This information is still relevant and useful. A brief summary of my interest in this volunteer position is as we discussed, the following: I spent my forty two years of professional work as an Urban Planner. All of this except a little over two years was in the State of Washington starting with King County. During the 17 years that 1 was employed by the State of Washington, the most relevant experience to this volunteer opportunity took place. For part of that time I resided in Tumwater, WA and served on its Planning Commission (and was the chairman). For most of those 17 years, I traveled all over Eastern Washington supporting and initiating Planning agencies and programs of all sizes. I was the agent for the "701" Urban Planning Assistance Grant Program. When I first moved to Spokane in 1971, while still employed by the State of Washington, I served on the Board of the YMCA of the Inland Empire and worked closely with civic organizations like the League of Women Voters and the Citizens for Development of a Housing Authority. I finished my professional planning career with Spokane County where I was the Zoning Enforcement Officer for several years, I worked with Shoreline Management and Long Range Planning(including what is now the City of Spokane Valley). I retired in June, 1999. While 1 am not up to date with the latest changes in the relevant laws related to Planning, I know what they are and where to find them. While 1 lack currant details, I can offer considerable experience and perspective in what Planning can and should accomplish. Staff will not have a difficult time explaining issues to me. I have the unique experience of being able to go and see the King County of today for which we planned over fifty years ago. My contribution then was planning for over 16,000 lots of residential development then which is still there to be seen today. I would be most happy to meet with those who will make the selection to assist them in any way that I am able. Sincerely Allan N. deLaubenfels ? - 1 ` 14PD3:34 RC"i ; CVo Valley Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 lax POSITION APPLYING FORT-9 m:i6 Applicant's name (please print): 'A C,i-k-- LL _4'�L t ,r•r, Applicant's Residence Address I _ f / 04-4-/2\\ �i� Jai 16.1 99 a 1 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): l] }}--rl Street City Zip Code (.l Applicant's Email: a_k + 6 CGS i e__ Home Phone: 50 l- q q`l' ""S3 k Work Phone: 5 01-51-0' S 6 Cell Phone: Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 1 `"1 u ecors NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate ormost boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female 1=1 Male 0 U.S. Citizen? 6 Wa. State Registered voter? EMPLOYMENT HISTORY• Present or last employer: trci_l UU:lli?, 5ckn( t 16-bc i C Position Held: 50001 f to '- Dates of Employment: `1/zoo 2- - PireS�v i Address: _{W3O1iT o ,tf? Phone: Z2$-5LU2L Previous Employer: a t'i ? i-k1,t 1 '+ti t ye p f Position Held: �,i Y ire c ce_ p_1ct� Dates of Employment: 3Lo_l - t°L_o3.---_ Address: _51s,I :44,1o.5P ibinvoctLi5T,LAt. I1 9_Zt C7 Phone: $.3S.-GI?op EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND}: High School:eft uC e.e.vl �t tG _\•.5c- O l Diploma: Yes 03 No OM City/State Address l r4 Vi A ca5 College/University:j SYliriq-�U1f1 L CU l(ey_ Oc Nh si> Degree Earned: 3a ,41Dr O- 'ASSi+r�ct City/State Address: li l writes NA)A 4J College/University: !S L,clliexs t i Degree Earned: MilSitr Uf t t c,f vi City/State Address: n.J rt LD COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT: (attach additional sheets if necessary) aSicj :‘,16) rr y� 1 ■ Sada a?� A • • ( .1 [� 4-fi U lrnti-i,Yt vt Ails/.CA/1 YL CCfna r.0 _ t! ? • �v C.va c.frk r w`d 1,-a.a baLL c .Q,vv r wet -14E1 Atra-1_-6,4„0.., VO UNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&P#E SENT: C.o rtt7 n( VD Lwrr v OP- _ ��. _ ' C v-i .at- - a a Uy Zl urr v�J wiz t �l.�r 1i �i,z-LA J _... u CA-4.42; ��f�Hr �Gu.v •� Va.v1.1.1-C1Lc Zr�7 1� SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES,OR COMMISSIONS: 11 Main *' 3-011St i 66,o D 1 -edit 14) Ltacttr 51 +p Fe-110'0J Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/Stdte 5c-ool I\lurs>~s o WA le is (&- i€ cow,r�i�H e- Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? cd r tcr.vnt.11 ,.,, , Jam /64)244'1 RA et- ,-(..) __ _, ld, e r_ f ..`Il _V4leH Ll irvc1 l p� .f?_. l �` u. f�,.t i0-7 47 A4 L i�L 2 i k 'cfa.� - a rit (� + 1 4 n 1 bo Cork 2.tJ r �rG z l �?1�1 Y 1,uekzA Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? VI -lave_ 11,u01Llvww, 1116../ (a pay_. lifivt.traI 1L) lititif T .Oen ,-,c�a;4,11).. c d helix O It-e(47 e4.4( teykAoLd ,tne, i ,Aelaletnit Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? KJ Q \elD. ,UrJ r,h. wv /2,-/E - ZD/Lt Signature Today's Date SiZkane,000 a11 - Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax r POSITION APPLYING FOR: f' ;li-,l.1-- /6- s't_ ( �" ii-'i I 5 7 C'.-.,/ Applicant's name (please print): : 1 .i. 2 (-i /()�' ;,r,� (1,-.)(1 Applicant's Residence Address_ / ''.54`,;°�. 2 4 , / Street / / City / Zip Code i Applicant's Mailing Address Of different from Residence address): ,_---- yStreet City Zip Code Applicant's Email: /i ac' // ? c)fr 04, r �f Home Phone: 7-7 2/ l,/,/ Work Phone: 'y`----- Cell Phone:5--e.) r - el"7- 7J?= Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 17 C/ el/e NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate or most boards, committees and commissions. r Gender: Female M MaleRUA U.S. Citizen? Y C ` Wa. State Registered voter? / EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: ,r� - _ ,r 1 Present or last employer: .! 1r ' ,f��x-2.- .,S`; i ,i( �-�{ /l .... ,:-17c.) , /chi,- 5 Position Held: 2 '1 -e'K-- Dates of Employment: .4.4:9C/c-1 4 --t .. C / ' I 1-',:.-{ 5.,,,, I. Address: i 62, 1'6.) tie(' d ' 4/14 c/c'c 3 5 Phone: `- `7- (-7 :Y7 - 7 Y.7(6 Previous Employer: . (1 L(, G ,c .' . Position IIeld: . 5/-2. r'c-' , Dates of(Employment; cif/2 4' /1 — /C t..?.6 ( Address: 13/'Ui,16f4Le-,,e /-1Z--t; (7x711 (sly'A' -' / 4)_//tt IM / Phone: r - EDUCATIONAL BAC(GROUND: r , High School: ')/-9 /; ,' //'9 ti -5c- Z/494-5"/ , Diploma: Yes Il ril No MI City/State Address `7/-9-4'-AY r _,(,)e,=.z) 14i% , ,, _ College/University: t 'S 0 /. i 7 7 / i '7'1 Degree Earned: Ale-7��. City/State Address: 1.9 ; . L CollegefUl niversity: 41`t i ' (( i, -A1.7 ti'-'1 .(6),771e7 el. Degree Earned: e)•LU City/State Address: �',4'Ir9-lI 02 7/-G--r�z-7 / Gr' G f.%r:5 77;'•51 77,,G1---'' COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) 112L" VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: AlO. SPEC SKILLS/INTERESTS: PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: G -)zit /4/e_ g‘`A ,/j- ; 2 CU.'?14/ ftt-e 49_5-50( tl/, r4Jc i 71/ (44X, v E }�/, L/l4 �l L.i 4. Committee Name / City/State -- Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? 1.,k' • .1 s S 5 /( I9 5/4 fry 610 Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are ap1 ' g? 40-- / • / / /3ro ftp oi;i`' l 6?"-/ Wkr'e 11611)1,1,ty r`,") C, 111-7 (1 C4I f Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? ! G/c) /a/ -� ' RECEIVED Signature 2814 Todayass sate ArpIrc;+tion `r'F;t ,,, I;11 I CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY CLERK SOOPane OCT I 1 911, T p 4 Clry 7, a cUi4 rvetk „ Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hail, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR Planning Commission Applicant's name (please print): Michael C Phillips Applicant's Residence Address 8925 E Cataldo Avenue Spokane Valley 99212 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email: mike@simpsonengineers.com Home Phone: 590-928-1028 Work Phone:509-926-1322 Cell Phone: 509-688-3751 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 37 Years NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female® Male lPP U.S. Citizen? YES Wa. State Registered voter? YES EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: Clarence E Simpson Engineers, Inc. Position Held: Land Surveyor Dates of Employment: 1970 to Date Address: N 909 Argonne Road, Spokane Valley,WA 99212 Phone: 509-926-1322 Previous Employer: Foss Launch and Tug Position Held: Deck Hand/Oiler Dates of Employment: 1969 till February 1970 Address: Seattle WA Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: Central Valley High School Diploma: No City/State Address Spokane Valley, WA College/University: EWU Degree Earned: _BA- Accounting City/State Address: Cheney, WA College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address: COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST&PRESENT:Volunteered at Hoopfest for several years. Volunteered for Habitat for Humanity. Taught Spokane County Employees the Principles of Legal Descriptions. Served of Spokane Valley, Planning Commission. Spokane Valley,WA VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST&PRESENT: Scout Master—Boy Scouts of America, Spokane County Storm Water Committee, Hoopfest, Spokane Valley Planning Commission SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: Licensed Professional Land Surveyor PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMI I'I'EES,OR COMMISSIONS: Past President of Inland Empire Chapter of the Land Surveyor Association of Washington Spokane, WA Secretary for Hutchinson Irrigation District#16 for 32 years Spokane Valley, WA Secretary for Carnhope Irrigation District#7 for 29 years Spokane Valley, WA Spokane Valley Planning Commission since 2013 Spokane Valley, WA What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? With my experience presenting various Projects before the City of Spokane &Spokane County Planning Commission in the Past and currently serving on the Spokane Valley Planning Commission I feeI I can bring a vast knowledge to the Commission. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? I have worked for 45 years with Land Related Issues. Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? Possibly, If our firm was working on an item that was coming before the commission I would excuse myself from that item. 411. , L20,,;_a IP" cD /9 713f Signature Today's Dare 'pokane fn,opspo ' 40/4 Application Form for Committees!Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: One �`�.2�t` -I.r�tl ) t star tlL�15 �i' lltn �-. J J Y Applicant's name(please print): �5O 2LVL, Sec,C,L Applicant's Residence Address: 2:3(2.. 5. 'Pin( Vc`i'. t : > r4C2 kirr 10c( 99(':x.) Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): P Cr Fk'7C -- x,1(82(•e Vice 9 C)(Th�� Street City 'Zip Code Applicant's Email: I n (. (arkc[ock • C,C>17i Home Phone: 50C) - 924.- I Work Phone: 569 • 24Z-S45 Cell Phone: Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 4C)ter. NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards,committees and commissions. Gender: Female Male D U.S.Citizen? p Wa. State Registered voter?_ `res EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: 1?c i. ,Y• Va((ey , .t tic Position Held: C0•0ep.1)er /a H Lc-J...11l?,c la jer Dates of Employment: Jail I, ?CM', fn p rt .en't Address: 205 5, Eve, seen fir{ , i�c)(cz,r}r' V2,l(e Lt CY)2,fG-, Phone: f,,�0c) • 2,42— Previous 42—Previous Employer: 17,rk.1_10C Position 1-leld: Co -(fit;-=ner kL i 1?Vie/ Dates of Employment: 19 Address: 2C6.5 -`.a. Ekl&fij et_Lin c( p( krto�' v:3.l( � { (C$A. 99Z1 , Phone: 4Y) 'c 'e 2 34 to EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: 1-1-0t44 rU4,07f'; ikt-, t it l t t Diploma: Yes v No 0� City/State Address Spolc2ti1e., College/University: (Jcia)('lLl1q fon rk2d . urtteYalfri Degree Earned: BA Ex Cairt4 City/State Address: cj )(t marl, (.J College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address: COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) \10t;i-h , c t.i Kdoi lkdu I+ ,` rr-fs -ea m el ids of *k;a,»_ Ilei.(let{ -sec/4 ri% . VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: .PArent 6(ub -xec,u+wc?,Tccrk Meril bee-• '11 cr)reeitrek 11(c'tii13pr; Lltaii(-c( atioh,t(Lc ; tri e r}l}S; GLi idLi1 liab 'yiLJecl r3; Pnlif cd_L L!anlp2tr3ns SPECIAL� .a. S7KCTT LSINTERESTS: r[ _ es rch Ct ks+orc.t X � ie t- c rk�17r� t�;i t{h,;n 3. @Dm rn ttpe- PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: b@CA V+tczC a:,PP((er AC3c,cc i :(- Ok e{ c R Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? Ea s( t CLI:tfit2L t i lits ryi le (00c((ci ccui + c/L5( tel ; �:�iza5c,r'ui,cc5, F� GlAar fer ti: tr tlt :; i IiaL rites ,c,1i,ic, �lr?,it c+ rusti.i t, ,tact mac((+12 (1 tc Why do you feel you arc qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you arc applying? fir iJ (��rtct Cehe, LL LRLc„tp1�4+�rr1 l9 c� tst .its (-nue, �� rf� �.� �.�► r.s. 1169 b(7pr(?c d bo5i nes e;. t Ltercioct (-roe r UCCA cLtti p .tz r, rich Cc,n-7 r-rn 53ccl) Ci ci eourICLE oleafcitC s, LLCJic .}p&ll hc. :; piece Zfaif70,1S JCL 4'120 5! (c (, -r dece(opu u tcj -4=x2._en tCtesP`i uLL pl?nn( i15 zcintn3. Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? N.c, C'tt 7``1. ( L//o/ /171: Signature Today's Date 1 ?-09- 1 `PO3 : 10 RCtJD `-0-T 0. alley' Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYy�y ING FOR: : u,rc� ��-� r 11 Applicants name(please print): 6'0 f" 1 o/l/ /D. 5/'I1/2/" C 7r� Applicant's Residence Address: // 3 / 2_ E. 3t i 7 ote ,2/4'E 8920(, Street ity Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address(if different from Residence address): /4 ,? Street City Zip Code Applicants Email: Lir D r ' e.) .,5p t `' A 0 L;r r N/ Home Phone: -> c `f— f 2 k--63 5j Work Phone: Co`!ci ZZ 7S-Cell Phone: /1/74 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 4(0 L EA' (22- 54:44E-' rf'o1ME NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards,committees and commissions. Gender: Female1=1 Male o . U.S. Citizen? 5 Wa. State Registered voter? L/ EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: (.1"/ 51"- 1�r LL 5 y / o uL' P / /� ( r Position Held: PI f�+'-� PA.'. O{AS"Sl/ 4 DatcsofEmployment: f/ /70 —Address: '2-0// 4/ /-16( Tc-/fPhone: q2 Previous Employer: 00 U /144 tl C l 6/ Position Held: / / .13 / 6.c 7d1 Dates of Employment: /C/' 7 41 /c2/ q)_.._. Address: Imo() . ' 0 U F /I= 7- /W `. Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: 012-41 nio,/() /1/104,1 V I '(/94/1÷- Diploma: Yes i No City/State Address ,D 2 (,/ yrl r)..vat ,4i X1.7714 College/University: moi✓/L''r f2r/ '7f/' ô ' /14 irr Degree Earned: e 19, ,; City/State Address: CC rl/' -4 rJ 41 .4 College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address: COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) Eyti lei 67- t (I) Lz.1 y -� 4,0 4 a iS 27('t'( l G &)4-y CE-L i(. . E= fes; 2.04 l f6,p/./e4-6-1-4 55-rzVt c. ' yeoliA2p 0 1,2,Eu-6e5 VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRESENT: gyp -2744 E / (I A-LG.C / f v o D 4/1/, `, �J�Lf f bin 67 S (1.4 V L t'. Gy t t,'C P:1 E 1 /-1 rZy PoL l'T.1c #Lcr AG770 , SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: r4t��D 2E/ -L)c,Z O 5'01(G cM 4ic/ 2Grpf &Lc) oL.LUW f 6 i'/ 'e/-/ao [ S c ( 73, Gu2.Rertir ei)Er -s' PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES,OR COMMISSIONS: • PA-c col/ c-1a Wil srfr,L'6 73 Ai Jac I -Tr D-� eP,4s Committee Name City/State SCN r'o/Z /4W/1/4/i) Cso 4f/2c c- P 4-z-.5-s-rd/v4 c./1171 ) Committee Name City/State / f S T lir 5774)G /51/CD Pa.6-417 T C)/ Committee Name Cit y/Statc What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? t v C' L r cr l0 ' !, 5i-m /7(D hi E. s'/A/c E /9 7 4 0 E Dde 2 4-17 17 Or= C�'rrfc W /9/2E /( *f2 r'L / •/ /1//3 Pz_Cav r� z/✓/ ir;14/ s 9Z/r[, ° r y Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? /1'/W c KE-P-7- /+P 2/ 4 s 7 O ‘M- &77z/,7r• Gf ' .C: ; 4L/ Err y T 'c - t vA'', -T /i'. M ' Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? vJ Air _niggled I P_ -‘-e - /g;//y Signature Today's Date Gordon D. Spunich, MBA, SPEAR. 11312 E 36t", Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 (509) 928-6336 (H) gordonspunich@yahoo.com Professional Director/ Human Resource Generalist Summary Results oriented and energized by challenges with over 20 years experience leading rnan.agenent/staffthrough rapid change including site closure, lay-off, and merger and re-sizing. Human resource competencies anchoring such successes include: *Leadership Development *Employee Relations *Compensation Plan Design *ADA/FMLA/FLSA Proficient *Technical Recruiting *Training/Employee Empowerment *Union Relations *Multi-State Employment Laws *Coaching/Conflict Resolution *Benefit/Retirement Plan Design *Policy Development *Employee Handbook Design Employment Chranoloy 2008 to Present-Para-Educator/Teacher's Assistant in West/Central Valley Schools. 2005-2007-Owner and General Manager, Global Recruiters Network Spokane. Established start up contingency executive search firm from scratch. Successfully designed and implemented complex recruiting strategies for finding, qualifying and placing executives within industry. 2004-2005-Human Resource Director/EEO Officer (350 employees), City of Missoula, Montana. Reported to Coo. Investigated/resolved EEO complaints. identified specific examples of significant employee sick leave abuses. Recruited new employees. Managed compensation and benefit plans. Promoted labor/union relations. Resolved employee conflict at all levels of the city. Insured adherence to state/federal laws and developed employment related policies and procedures. 2001-2003-Director Human Resource Consulting(500 Businesses), TPM Resource Solutions. Reported to CEO. Provided in-depth HR support to small businesses(25-150 employees) in a six-state region. Developed customized employee handbooks from scratch. Provided customized leadership training. Identified need for and implemented drug/alcohol testing programs. Authored management oriented articles for publication in monthly newsletter. Identified potential conflicts with employee related federal/state law and provided corrective recommendations to executive managementlowners. 1984-2000- Deaconess Medical Center,Spokane,Washington---a tertiary,level two trauma center with 376 licensed beds. Human Resource Director(1992-2000) (1600 employees). Reported to VP of HR. Coached and counseled 64 managers, directors and COO. Voted as member of Corporate Retirement Committee including CEO, VP and corporate attorney. Insured employee records withstood scrutiny of outside audit. Recruited highly specialized positions using in-house resources and avoided 25-30% outside recruiter's fee. Reduced unemployment costs by successfully representing employer at hearings. Filled role as lead HR professional charged with designing and implementing plans effecting closure of 400-employee hospital. Developed staff. redesign programs positively impacting bottom line with no employee grievances or lltl�TCltl(1i7. 1988-1992-Corporate Director-Personnel (350 employees). Reported to VP of HR.. Provided III support to corporate staff with direct responsibility for 15 employees performing payroll, compensation and benefits work. Designed and communicated merit pay program for management and pay per visit(not per hour) plan for staff employees. Quarterbacked planning;/implementation/communication of defined contribution (IRC 403b) addition to employee retirement plan. Provided leadership related to consolidation of employee medical/dental plans using a cafeteria plan (IRC 125(1) for multi-hospital system. Saved employer $50,000 in annual employment taxes, 1984-1988-Compensation and Benefit Manager(1200 employees). Reported to VP of HR. Managed compensation, benefit and retirement plans_ Performed all employee orientation/training. 1988-2001-Adjunct Faculty Member. Taught business management night classes at Whitworth College, Gonzaga University, City University and Spokane Falls Community College, Spokane, Washington. Consistently achieved high student evaluations_ Professional Memberships and Associations • United Health Services Credit Union Board of Directors (Vice Chairman). • lluman Resources Board, Spokane County Health Care District. • Northeast Council of Hospital Personnel Administrators(past Chairman). • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (member). • Senior Human Resource Professional(SPHR)_ • Valley Kiwanis(Past Distinguished President). • Heal the Children (past Chairman of Board of Directors). • United Way Allocation Panels (Assistant Chair). Formal Education. • MBA, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana: Emphasis in management and finance. • BS, University of Montana, Missoula,Montana: Emphasis in business and accounting. RECEEVED Spokane Valley City of Spokane Valley Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: RA Li Cia A,1 Ni:1st 1••'E. PI ei44.01e•r^ Applicant's name(please print): 04" 0 al 1I/ 5 -- Applicant's Residence Address: f 7 ..1 - _44 _ ., . _ ........ Al /4 Street ' ity �J, ip Code Applicant's Mailing Address(if different from Residence address): 5- /fi . ,o W✓ Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email: i'1f,2 J.)& Aff.5 Al, (Ian') Home Phone: 5—z '' 7 4',,.,2 64 / Work Phone: , ? fc2S47 57,2/5- Celt Phone: ,,A4....1,-,4..1,-, e. . A, tale Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: • r ..,, 5—iti 017 NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participat on most boards, comms tees and commissions, Gender: Female FijiMale pr U.S. Citizen? y -5 Wa. State Registered voter? EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: _ Present or last employer: (7.5 ; A h- No 'e e I ' : _ '-e-, Position Held: 471, 0 ,r,+..�..- / Ie'e„ i sates of Employment: --' ._ •• 1— Address: 1 e{,- C/10/ A PI f.J ,4 Phone: 6-0/ .2',/ 7 Lid 1-5-- Previous Employer: P44r -"Fi nn e,../1„,,, /L r.rs 4 6i" _ Position Held: f - • I / Dates of Employment: /1.913 ' 7' Address: _ Phone: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: rr- l High School: "5-ip is L Fu f k h �.F (I Diploma: Yes No City/State Address College/University: 1,'/ -' I V, /4 C9/4 4 , Degree Earned; City/State Address: db � f/. +' <. tl College/University: f1Al,T1I-4,1 /+^a- r.47 1,-I d4o' gree Earned: da,„.1 jei`z-A, 45 City/State Address. _r , p ++%-s✓- L ill 0t `[loons ' \':Its.') AppliC rum I i i t'ii Mint ( (Hl)liliyyit iS Pii:N I (If 2 COMMUN1ITY lRI ELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST& PRESENT:(attach additional sheets irf necessary) VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST&P,"ESENT• _ � ,... 1 ,,, ., jam► .. 4 ! b kr, JI sal O) r v a 4 1. o Y V; L r R 1 144.4.'21 SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: 1�'L7✓� r^ i ,8. 0'71d't'G l z �� / �/1)141- e.• 4 4 _ /'•iCJ�� 52-2." YY4G� �ljl'� Lac•'f^' ' F!e' PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: e-0N-AA" d ,1 i,40 Sia a I Gc% Committee Name City/State A r r„, 1-eey Jx r. S/ .�. Committee Name ry ,D City/State ov✓E G .. - .�4 !e w -�i/a►�Y 12 c` f f.�•r n a r, , JT'// 4"> Committee Name 1” r City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? 46 e--e- /01 .0/ % .0, . .�1,"� /V9 f- p 1-4- rP Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? v 5p /a r 11i /Ie 1,1-5 e- AA p",9 Qv_ .5 /1,140`+1 4I/1. - / f l`dam 45 , IkO, e -lean Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? h'iep Y 414 a, Signature Today's Date � CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6,2015 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Mayoral Appointments: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.20.040 Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: The City Council shall establish a lodging tax advisory committee consisting of five members. Two members of the committee shall be representatives of businesses required to collect the tax, and at least two members shall be persons involved in activities authorized to be funded by this chapter. The committee shall be comprised equally of members who represent businesses required to collect the tax and members who are involved in funded activities. One member of the committee shall be from the city council. Annually, the membership of the committee shall be reviewed. The mayor shall nominate persons and the councilmember with council confirmation of the nominees.Nominations shall state the term of committee membership. Appointments shall be for either a one or a two-year term. BACKGROUND: As of December 31, 2014, there will be two vacancies on the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee, one for an individual involved in activities authorized to be funded by the tax, and one for a representative of a business authorized to collect the tax. Terms are for either one or two years at the Mayor's discretion and will begin January 1, 2015. A vacancy announcement was posted on the City's webpage, and was published numerous times in the Spokesman Review and in the Valley News Herald. The deadline to submit applications was December 12, 2014. The two incumbents are seeking re-appointment. Five applications were submitted and previously routed to Council for review: Backsen, Keith - Visit Spokane [incumbent] Cameron, Lee - Mirabeau Park Hotel [incumbent] Doering, Peggy -Valleyfest Rolshoven, Brian—Valleyfest Stocker, Charles—The HUB The current committee consists of Councilmember Wick as Chair, and: Entities which collect the tax Entities Involved in Activities funded by the tax Jeff Fiman— Sterling Hospitality/Quality Inn Herman Meier—Heritage Museum (current 2-year term ends 12-31-15) (current 2-year term ends 12-31-15) Lee Cameron—Mirabeau Park Hotel Keith Backsen—Visit Spokane (current 2-year term, ends 12-31-14) (current 2-year term, ends 12-31-14) OPTIONS: Confirm the Mayor's recommendations or choose not to confirm one or both nominations. If the motion to confirm does not pass,Mayor Grafos may make other nominations. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to confirm the following Mayoral appointments to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee: 1. Councilmember Wick, Council Liaison,for 2015 calendar year 2. for a -year term (representing an entity authorized to be funded by the tax) 3. for a -year term (representing a business required to collect the tax) BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: STAFF/COUNCIL CONTACT: Mayor Grafos ATTACHMENTS: Lodging Tax Applications .. RECEIVED Spokane DEC 12 2U14 • Valley CITy op SPORK E vCiTYALLEY Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Applicant's name (please print): Keith William Backsen Applicant's Residence.Address:1914 S.Rldgemont Drive Spokane Valley 99037 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email: kbacksen©visitspokane.com Home Phone: 509.8917206 Work Phone:509"742"9375 Cell Phone: 509-993-9819 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: 10 Years NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female Male U.S. Citizen? Yes Wa. State Registered voter? Yes EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: Visit Spokane Position Held: Vice President of Convention Sales and Services Dates of Employment: 2005-Present Address: 801 W.Riverside Avenue,Suite 301,Spokane,WA 99201 Phone: 509624-1341 Previous Employer: GES-Global Experience Specialists Position Held: Director of Sales-Central Division Dates of Employment:1998-2005 Address: 5248 S.Cicero Avenue,Chicago,IL 60632 Phone: 773-767-2237 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: Canby Union High School Diploma: Yes il' II No City/State Address 721 SW 4th,Canby,OR 97013 BS in Hotel Restaurant&Tourism College/University: Oregon State University Degree Earned: Management 1967 City/State Address: Corvallis,OR 97331 College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address: COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT: (attach additional sheets if necessary) Present-Member of the Spokane Hctel/Motel Association Present-Honorary Eagle with the 92nd Air Refueling team at Fairchild Air Force Base Past-Supporter of the Central Valley High School Track and Cross Country team Past-Graduate of Leadership Spokane VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST&PRESENT: Present-Spokane River cleanup;food sorting at 2nd Harvest;blood donor for Intend Northwest Blood Center Past-Community service projects with my church and industry organizations. Painted walls and landscaped at a Women and Children's Shelter in Las Vegas Organized interior and exterior cleanup projects for local church, Taught Sunday Schad and sang in church choir. SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: Skills I will bring to this committee are experience in working with groups on projects,building consensus,developing a work plan and managing both project goats and budgets to deliver a finished product on time and on budget. I possess excellent communication skills and experience managing teams both large and small. Interests: Hiking,skiing and water activities;working on home and yard improvement projects. PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL.,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMM11'11ES,OR COMMISSIONS: See Attachment A Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? See Attachment B Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? See Attachment C Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? No Should a topic arise that presents that possibility,I would rescue myself from weighing in on that particular issue, Extra sheet for Keith Backsen's application for the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Community Related Activities, Past& Present: 2007 Graduation of Leadership Spokane, Honorary Commander (Eagle Status) at Fairchild Air Force Base, involved on the Spokane Convention Center addition planning committee. Volunteer Experiences, Past& Present: Various leadership roles in my local church as a committee chair and leadership board, Participate in Spokane River clean up annually, volunteer time at 2nd Harvest packing items annually, volunteer multiple times per year at Plantes Ferry Soccer complex helping with parking and marshalling for soccer tournaments Special Skills! Interests: Passionate committed hospitality industry member, love the outdoors and spending time with my family, organized, enjoy working with others in group settings. Good at managing budgets and individuals. What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from the information already furnished? As you can see from my experience, the type of work I do requires that most of my volunteer time is spent on boards and commissions outside Spokane Valley. This opportunity would allow me to use my talents to help benefit the community I live and an industry that I am passionate to see grow. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? The hospitality industry has been my career path of choice for 27 plus years. My experience ranges from private sector (hotel experience, tradeshow decorator and food service) to working for two 501c associations responsible for marketing the destination. Each of these positions is dependent on the visitor coming to the destination for leisure or group travel. I feel the knowledge I have in the hospitality industry can be an asset to this committee. J./ /21/ Ufa Sign. ureToday's ate City of Spokane Valley Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Application Attachment A PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: Current -- Committee Member- City of Spokane Valley Lodging Tax Committee, Spokane Valley, Washington Current -- Chapter Past President - Pacific Northwest Chapter of Professional Convention Management Association, Seattle Washington Current -- Committee Member - DMO EmpowerMlNT Adoption Sub- Committee - Destination Marketing Association International, Washington, D.C. Current -- Member— Convention Sales Professional International, Princeton Junction, New Jersey Past - Committee Member - City of Spokane Valley Economic Development Committee, Spokane Valley, Washington Past -- Industry Relations Chair- Convention Sales Professional International Board of Directors, Princeton Junction, New Jersey Past -- Past Chair, Board of Trustees - Veradale United Church of Christ, Spokane Valley, WA Past -- Board Member- American Cancer Society, Spokane Chapter, Spokane, WA Past -- Committee Member- Washington Lodging Association Green Team Alliance, Olympia, WA Attachment B What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? I have a passion to see Spokane Valley continue to grow and prosper with the right mix of new development. I respect the historic past of the Spokane Valley and want to see the community embrace its natural assets such as the river and natural areas like Dishman Hills and Mirabeau Park. My experience working on many boards and committees has helped me to understand what it takes to work with diverse groups of people and ideas to build consensus and reach a positive outcome. I have a sense of dedication and the necessary patience to see projects and tasks through to completion. City of Spokane Valley Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Application Attachment C Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? Economic Development through tourism is critical to the success of our community. As a resident of Spokane Valley, it is important to me to see our community thrive by developing successful businesses and events that maximize the visitor experience. My decades of experience working directly in the tourism industry would be a very beneficial addition to the committee assigned to advise the council on the use of lodging tax funds for the benefit of Spokane Valley. Tourism is the 4th largest employer in the state of Washington. In many communities, small and large, tourism fuels their main streets, attracts people to relocate their families and their businesses and drives the quality of life for its residents. For the last ten years Spokane Valley has been my home. Before that, I had the pleasure to live in some great communities where tourism worked hand in hand with economic development to create a sense of community. In those places, people drove to work in the big city, but could not wait to escape back to the communities they called home at the end of a work day. Families did not have to leave on the weekend to find leisure activities to enjoy. Spokane Valley has these same kinds of attributes just waiting to be fully developed and appreciated. Similar communities include cities like Plainfield, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago; Lewisville, Texas, a suburb of Dallas; and Newberg, Oregon, one of many bedroom communities to Portland. Each of these communities continues to exist today because they use the power of tourism development to drive the quality of life for their residents. Quality of life is the single most important factor that attracts a large employer to relocate or draws more residents who may work outside Spokane Valley, but want to call the Valley home. 12-12-'14 06:39 FROM- Virabeau HR Dept 509-922-6275 T-389 P0001/0003 F-646 1100 N.Sutl ran Rd.Spokane VaFSey,WA 09037 elf Phone:(509)924-9000 Fax:(509)922-4965 '"ria' ,1181S, ft/NI R1.D6C €r°110: L-. s.. AmeRyA) . --- Pa►x; o 9. $&_ o f q p!! % Phaws path I II �..�..�_ ,ee 2. go QC: Uniont 'Por Review U plssse Commput El Malmo R•ply fi*hese Recycle • • Comments; �049100 g P co,v-7 A-1 u 6W6 ,17 56- t/i c Do 77t E err)/ -- -16010( y°L, 1%-ciikt„ c Ot4.70 04.,_ 1,9 2014 � . 'k��.A446-p. 12-12-'14 06:39 FROM- Mirabeau HR Dept 509-922-6275 T-389 P0002/0003 F-646 Spokane y Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E.Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: .+ dr.. aA . ' .. _ i Et . -�.• : r s lit u • Applicants name(please print): C J A f �.1 - Applicant's Residerfct Address: f;r, • Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address(ir dFfferont from Residence address):: NA Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email: LGAfn2 Pei R 1-IpTiid— C,rc'rYL Home Phone: 5p 9 9'u2j 9000 Work Phone: 53 69:6 V I R6 Cell Phone::i' 5' zle(o Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits:__JLxgs. rho , NOTE;You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender:Female[J Male El, U.S.Citizen? )/ Wa.State Registered voter? y EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: irt1.fit,a_ __-Eg dig. e L. Position Held: W,JEg_ Dates of Employment: A 1' Address: 110 0 JJ. V Il) g`�rf SP KA h?i 01tL :._1441 .._.. '?'P ' Phone: _co? ''v"tq' 7oov Previous Employer: lLU 'ESor Position Held: G t. E.R.AL I Ate AC. . Dates of Employment: /97;1 'JoanC Address: - Ol W • .. T oC9 0rt1 = ' Phone: 3&.0 g70 g/ EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND; High School:_ ig, .j_1_Ll IJ Diploma: yes 10 No rni Ciry/State Address_S -s ` rac-E.JAA College/University: p� z ,U1v`� t l r.� T CL Degree Earned. 01 ye . _ City/State Address; College/University:�� `;I t]i3 $1 I E titCPSfryDegree Earned: City/State Address: J4 LLfn 0.4Q, WA. (,1[\ 11l N x!,..111.'\.161Q. .\1,1,!H:fit i n lot L.;1111111111c.`l:S lki,slid~t 111 MI ki1i111w L.VI°t101 .: A111LI.ii . 'ulI 12-12-' 14 06:39 FROM- Mirabeau HR Dept 509-922-6275 7-389 PO003/0003 F-646 -PAs-r COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) Ro ARA-3 M OMR-EV:" ?KA.I + i LE ari 1. o N r� ii_$rrr. r 4,coorie4Q-D i E eAltJLO_IfkCo zr s- . 1.�d P N M►+ a .C, t t L RP4:1-644^•u+l E,i �T� i c + � 1 r" y a13LS SO, al<rGa ICC U#JTy U LS �a co'►-'u /-1 r4 ,tzEAt.t, iRg rme -Tlezt o-P'r-' s N + ARE - r_ , VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,FAST&PRESENT: mou, t•5+n.l, cr+t1c r L. 1 to 2, ikrikt•!!5, __[qui-RR d rn Z (2. - a � 33.tiLF x� �I�m,o.013 S, La!'" fly C.L6..fn� F�tJ�117, �� _ . 41.111 , . SPECIAL SK1LLS/INTER}STS: y ' =,.�'s C c.0 -) Ra s6" " o f Pb r+�y ku tl r F, 140 ':� I J►��t c� 1!J 4 R)? ' .Th P A t + - . iCl ..r r_r c at g { o fho"r't`. -7"I),)4 _ pu► a c d rnM r "'..r, :.S f N tM1 l~,.ctR ZE T FYWir tt K 1.--'Llyr fi grGa / C& AL . Tr, �awc Lrz.g coon ke.14F iD PMf E r-rch /I ai PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES,OR COMMISSIONS: . L.L1 irk 11 .► Committee Name City/State PoL Akicoo u-r>i 14 4 Po fk ui S,(lia , igPAg.l, . Committee Name City/State rrl}Qsona Asp w 0,01-4 Air I-1a 4'i , _ ► _ 1 ► • � o ► t` oui,-ry, WA Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? AM 1M oTt U+''i ►� -ro 0 s S 1 s"F.-11-4 C r!-yr o i' SP0GCtx!!u E- LAiv,Le,y TO a0m!(- r�kU ate ,61'r�' fi ?you cel xe IN VIE, R,E611".1. `� UAtot4, f y Cul RPr0'E' PoS1M°1 T14 TRx r4p r, sSo 2y co MMfl igiup rSEA TN4T RC.k6 Rro uAi I) is_ A [4e,,JF,F 17. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission.for whichyou are applying idE. As A CrTV VI RUE. mAPy CL-1At..G1;r1co F I-1 1P fl 1•►A s g*J et) 11-14 eta y/ 131A014"6 aR ury r7 bCr.,o LeI—Ed Mmet,i-Tgd J T /1Jt PRo r L1 fv Bout /0/G C31311,41y aAw Rg- A $asstpv n.zsJ7 Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of intet?_ ( ) It ►� .k.�- !of 1 Q Signature I,jr. L. ( I fl'r jp[J 1 Today's Da C i n1 ',NUN' �Ll1�CL .�I��Iti'dllll!1 1111(.t$1I1111It(( eL,IS111:1N`i II):, 01 ? ,1411L1ar El Spokane RECEIVED Valley' DEC 1 201 Application Form for CITY iDCMSPOKANE CLER{tALLEY Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: Lodging Tax Advisory_Committee Applicant's name(please print):Margaret(Peggy) Doering Applicant's Residence Address: 11522 E. Sunview Circle, Spokane Valley 99206 Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address Of different from Residence address): Street City Applicant's Email: peggyvalleyfest:org Home Phone: 509 924-6829 Work Phone: 509 922-3299 Cell Phone: 509 230-6829 Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits:31years NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Fcmalc yes ) Male 1=1 U.S. Citizen?yes WA. State Registered voter? Yes EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: Valley fest Position Held: Executive Director Dates of Employment: 1996-2014 Address: 10814 E. l3roaciwav Spokane Valley WA 99206 Phone: 509 922-3299 Previous Employer: Mid City Concerns Position Held: Volunteer Coordinator Dates of Employment: 1998-2003 Address: 1222 W. Second Spokane WA 99201 Phone: 456-6597 EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND. High School: Bishop Kelly High School Diploma: Yes es No D D City/State Address: Boise,Idaho 1 .'__✓ College/University: Gonzaga University Degree Earned: RA City/State Address: Spokane WA College/University: Idaho State University Degree Earned: 30 Graduate Credits City/State Address: Pocatello. Idaho COMMUNI'T'Y RELATED ACTIVITIES,PAST & PRESENT: YMCA Advisory Board,Greater Gonzaga Guild, Valleyfest,SC Medical Auxiliary,Washington State Medical Alliance,St.Mary's School Foundation,PEO,Campfire,Girl Scouts,Boy Scouts,Washington State Fair and Festival Board,(WF EA,)Gonzaga University School of Business Dean Advisory Board,Community Health VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES,PAST & PRESENT: Valleyfest, Meals on Wheels, Youth activitics(BSA, Girls Scouts, community healthier projects, Spokane Preservation Advocates,MAC,church and school SPACE program and the YMCA SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS: Community organization,reading, PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS O.R. GOVERNMENT BOARDS,COMMITTEES,OR COMMISSIONS: Lodging Tax Advisory Committee Spokane Valley,WA Committee Name City/State YMCA Advisory Board Spokane WA Committee Name City/State Gonzaga University School of Business Dean's Advisory Board Spokane WA Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? Over the past years,I have worked on tourism for the City of Spokane Valley through Valleyfest. This includes meetings with Visit Spokane Sports Commission, Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce and business leaders. Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are applying? Since the City of Spokane Valley was incorporated, I have served several terms on this committee. From the conversations with elected officials at the state and city level, I understand the intent of the law and the process in which these funds can be allocated while supporting the goals of the City of Spokane Valley. Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest?no Signature , Today's Date RECEIVED SboTv kane DEC 1 1 2014 Valley Gin a. St-0KANE VALLEY Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 r 509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: �-iD[), rn7 ��r GU..56in Cr-1,73r+�`-7fne Applicant's name (please print): r-► r o 1611.4 J Applicant's Residence Address: i f;3QS /fir_`(1- J 1.1_1, t.), StreetCity e Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): 6 � i {i 5 _ r.,�.;, ,, ': J ( l + Street City Zip Code Applicant's Email: inia_ (Y) 1.4 .iQ rl (''� Liu h 60 1 (o-0-1. Home Phone: /— 7 2,9 S Work Phone: Cell Phone:N.4) 34—!,leInf Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female M Male b r U.S. Citizen? I , Wa. State Registered voter? Yqo EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: Present or last employer: ,ra < ,...;. Viers tecJ( 7' i 's Position Held: C� p y — u ,�C E� .:�-� Dates of Em Io exit: �, ""•�D f•( Address: 4 .A P : A a J � L�1rr� Yt'� J Phon o9•' ,`- - `k:q-- Previous Employer: [r ic4,? CJvt c1ec.45401c2, Position Held: /114,-0-30,4,-2(c, p Dates of Employment: 1,Q-5101 1-.Qe/(( Address: t 1 5c,.tsi Phone: `J a-Th� )_ EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: High School: \ 1 t K _ Diploma: Yes No M City/State Address (Y)s (, (Yl< , College/University: f ry 4 ,r'i1s Lt4ee Earn d: b ytO ,+ 2 City/State Address:- \],r, iJ2c College/University: Degree Earned: City/State Address: - COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) Iankf:eree 0..,J (re C'ycie r 0IC5nq 1.- ) ,LA C\6Clk C '1 O 1 ."rune VOL ER EXPERIENCES,PAST&PRE ENT: to JL f(el- c' + '6i i-t6�<c. C 1 , i.),, ;c-, n l.-1 „dcl,1:W-M1d) y 6M 3 Oa uc- rc err s, sz‹,,,a .i-i! !/ 0740.-„,„:„.,• 11 r SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS; WO.,-3 ,,.kf 1. t .,-'C" e c}n,,tc--iiOyl a.Ai-f 3-,v.,� c''.sc, „Welk, PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS: Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? C l � wds-pr , q- a(tQA r3 ari i [IV (n1SS ,.t . 01sinl,-,ick_ NoVice ) Tac 1..4,I4. a 4i i Wa nyt,t 41 011,AQC 0055 i LJG1/41 1.-<:e t''�u,a-ci -(';e1-1-- I Gbd 114i( r CanTIR cd` 514--4 54c,' Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying?� - )?c4A2 r connec,r4- Lc, +/j4— e' " 5 n h01p Zunai-0-, 744,,)_____g(_fj-t N L) ll hof 0+001.6k OGJt rai)- LJk4eJ Cha Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? an ejj F Signature Today's Date Spokane A RECEIVED CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY CLERK Application Form for Committees/Boards/Commissions Return Completed form to City Clerk at City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509.720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax POSITION APPLYING FOR: .4'd4!7-.`r�/f/�, z),-„ n„; Applicant's name(please print): ( �� Applicant's Residence Address: 7 -2/ / urY�+ J <� r aw rWi+_L-_ L( rrnL ` c'6GSf Street City Zip Code Applicant's Mailing Address(if different from Residence address): Streit ,� City Zip Code 6?I:-Applicant's Email: 5 �� *'�►' �i�) (4.) n-.r`�.:} �- � ,' _" Home Phone: � Le 2 u 7e Work Phone: Cell Phone: </ Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: Y - y 7 u r+/t,,ezti;11-...-N a - NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions. Gender: Female 1=1 Male ;Mil U.S. Citizen? lie 5 Wa. State Registered voter? 6-0 EMPLOYMENT HISTORY: l Present or last employer: f c. ,� r) /70 �w ?r L, %1'71 Position Held: fig7e„a 0,..c r, "IL/ /24 is f, 0/15 Dates of Employment: I . a o `: Address: Phone: Previous Employer: C1917"' i1,4 /,1 7 t 11 1.J r` � S Yi1ro C f Position Held: S �f/? ., r,-J41-��1 CI 5-C /,c�:'I Dates of Employment: I Address: Phone: High School: ri, A /V �f Sc A i c' / EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND: g �7�� _s _ Diploma: Yes 1.1PAL No City/State Address64�� ,.54 4» - College/University: WS, i/ Degree Earned: '5r ►'. C..k• / City/State Address: 7 v/f 1.,a c'r+- __L rt --_ yra,n +r -1 :v1 SC-;'I,'*r cea5 College/University: 1-C1 S ✓ Degree Earned: /1"-)7. City/State Address: a / /l6 Jr1 (efl4WY „5-c:c1'! COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVTITES,PAST&PRESENT:(attach additional sheets if necessary) e a `-/ rAe VOLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST&PRESENT: SPECIAL SK L S/INTERESTS: r C fr)lecI1 o PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL,CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR GOVERNMENT BOARDS,CO I I ES,OR COMMISSIONS: c 4 Hei.le Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State Committee Name City/State What do you feel you can contribute to/the community that may not be evident from information already furnished? 1 Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board,Committee or Commission for which you are applying? e Gr7L� octY Would your appointment to this position create conflict of interest 4 r an ppearance of a conflict of interest? _ ` f — } '1./17 115L Signature Today's Date CHARLES G. STOCKER 9315 North Murray Road Newman Lake, WA. 99025 (509) - 226-2078 —home (509)—789-4244—office SUMMARY Educational administration with over 29 years of experience in the full range of school administrative functions. Unique appreciation and understanding of the relationship between students, staff, administrators and the community. Excellent reputation for design and implementation of sound procedures for budget and long-range planning and for innovation programs and procedures that maximize human productivity and organization effectiveness. Well experienced in planning new buildings and improving existing plant facilities. Strong values on community involvement in youth sports, church, and civic organizations. MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS Personnel • Responsible for the entire personnel program for both certificated and classified employees which includes selection, evaluation, certification, assignment, class load, and transfer of personnel, as well as separation of employment and record keeping. • direct all administrative, certificated, and classified negotiations • interpret all bargaining agreement for employees, supervisors, and the community • review and handle all grievances and arbitration cases • confer with the district's legal counsel on administrative and personnel matters when needed • organized a district Job-sharing program • developed an Affirmative Action program • instructed and administered a district Administrative Internship program • direct staff orientation programs • developed an Employee Assistance program • instructor of Personnel Graduate Studies at Gonzaga University Long-Range Planning • developed a Mission Statement for the district • developed a long-range improvement plan, instituting construction of new plant facilities, as well as making improvements of existing structures • rewrote administrative team guidelines • project future enrollments and determine appropriate staffing levels • on-going budget review to include increasing cash position • implemented community goal setting process for the school district • advised school board members in setting District goals and direction Curriculum • developed an AIDS education curriculum for the district • developed a new K-12 counseling program • reorganized the grades 4-6 vocal music program • developed a vocational cooperative program with Spokane Community College, culminating in the building of the Spokane Vocational Skills Center • developed new programs in traffic safety, drug education, and horticulture • provided leadership for the Central Valley, Freeman, and East Valley School Districts total instruction program • at Central Valley, directed and implement a new K-6 pupil progress reporting system; initiated the elementary physical education specialist program; placed full time reading specialists in each elementary school; directed the preparation of curriculum guides for major subject areas; and initiated the graphics program for University High School • at Freeman, began an elementary counseling program; initiated a new technology program for the District; conducted and finalized the District Self Study program • at East Valley, began an alternative Program for high school students; implemented a restructuring process for the District; started campus security personnel for our schools; developed a Iong-range District technology plan and helped to implement multi-age classrooms • started a year around program for East Valley students K-8 Folia° • administer all district personnel policies • provide guidance in developing,revising and updating all Board policies • administer the Student Responsibilities and Rights policy • administer the safety and health program for the district • administer the risk management program • administer the Washington Administrative Code for Schools School Business • responsible for planning and supervising the school district budget • plan and recommend bond and levy issues • approve district purchases and expenditures • administer the Collective Bargaining Agreement • participate in legislative conferences in Olympia • keep abreast of and interpret State education laws Community Relations • Spokane Valley Hospital: President 1991 1996; Community Advisory Board, 1979 — 1980 and 1988-1996 • Empire Health Services: Director 1991 —2001; Treasurer of Board June, 1994— June, 1996; Vice-President of Board, July 1996— 1998 Committees: --Evaluation of CEO --Finance Chairman, two years --Audit -- Nominating • Attendance at six national conferences on health care. • Past president of Spokane Valley Hospital Foundation Board of Directors • Member of the committee to select the Dean of Education and two professors for Gonzaga University • Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce: Board of Directors, two years; Vice President, 1987-88; Co-chairman of Education Committee, 1988-89; Vice President 1996-97; organized the first"One-on-One" (business/school) program • Rotary Club: Charter member new club 1979; various offices held, including president, 1983-84 • Board member of the Spokane YMCA (six years) • Board member of New Hope Training Center(five years) • Redeemer Lutheran Church: elder, usher, Education Committee, and chairman of the Building Committee completed construction of a new $1.2 million facility, 1987; chairman of fund raiser committee 1990 • Past member of the Spokane Future Committee of 100 • Volunteer Coach for youth sports teams (16 years) • Member of New Century Steering Committee for Spokane county and area • Public communications: radio, television, and newspaper Presentations/Accomplishments • Many community meeting presentations during 1991-1996 for goal setting, levies and bond issues. • "How to Pass Bond Issues" to Washington State Construction Conference, 1990 • "Principal Evaluation"to Western Canada Administrator's Conference, Calgary, B.C., 1988 • "Team Management" to National Personnel Conference, Seattle, 1985 • "Leadership Styles"to Western Canada Administrator's Conference, 1982 • "Leadership, Motivation, and Evaluation" to Kamloops,B.C. School District, 1982 • "Team Management"to National Personnel Conference, Seattle, 1981 • "Team Evaluation" to administrators in Calgary, B.C., 1981 • "Team Management"to National Personnel Conference, Detroit, 1980 • Consultant re: Management Team Concepts to Edmonton, Alberta, School District, 1980 • Washington State Public School Employees Honorary Member Award, 1986 • Washington Congress PTSA Outstanding Service Award, 1984 • Central Valley Education Association (CVEA) "500 Hours" Award • Outstanding Young Agriculture Teacher of the State of Washington, 1967 • Central Valley Teacher of the Year Finalist, 1966 Professional Development • President Northeast Washington School Administrators, 1992-1994 • Received the Washington Association School Administrator's Award of Merit, 1995 • Member Board of Directors Washington Association of School Administration, October 1995 . 1998 • Liaison to the Washington Interscholastic Athletic Association for Superintendents of the State of Washington, 1994-1998 • President of Bi-county Superintendents' Association, 1988-1990 • Member, Collegian Superintendents' Organization, 1991 — 1998 • Member, Advisory Committee to Judith Billings, SP1 Office, 1990-91 • President, WASA Superintendents' Component Group, 1990- 91 • "One Minute Manager"workshop,Blanchard & Associates, 1986 • organized the Washington State Personnel Conference, 1985 • National School Board presentation on"Merit Pay"by Dr. Glenn Tucker, 1985 • University Associates Organizational Development Conference, 1984 • Completed SRI Perceiver Interview Course • State and national committees --State Vocational Advisory Committee -- State Gifted Committee --Reader, State Grant Committee --NEWASA Resolutions Committee --NEWASA Benefits Committee, chairperson -- AASPA Resolutions Committee -- School Information and Research Service State Committee, six year Note: Married forKyears. My wife and I have four grown children and t grandchildren. Attachment After retiring from education July 1998, 1 became an employee at Inland Power &Light Company September of 1998. I work in the area of Community Relations. My present job description includes four major areas of responsibilities. 1. Visit and interact with 90-100 key accounts in 13 different counties served by Inland Power&Light. 2. Be involved with the different area Chamber of Commerce's and other civic groups_ 3. Maintain a liaison with our local, state and federal elected officials 4. Contact potential new accounts as required. I have been involved on a regular basis with the Spokane Regional Chamber and the Spokane Area Economic Development Council in the Past. I have served on both agencies Board of Directors and presently serve on the Chamber Public Policy Committee. Attendance at the last 5-7 legislative meetings in Olympia has been on my agenda. I have just been appointed to the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors. I attend the Deer Park and West Plains Chamber's monthly meetings. I also served as chairman of the West Plains Business Association for five years. Presently I serve on the Inland Northwest Blood Bank Board. Starting July 1, 2007 I will become treasurer of the Blood Bank Board of Directors. I am still involved with many different organizations in the area. During the calendar year 2011 Valley chamber 1. attend the government affairs committee 2. member Business and Education committee 3. help to host the candidate forums for the chamber Member of the Valley Hospital advisory board President of the Inland Northwest Blood Bank Board of Directors Member of the HUB Board of Directors Chairman of the Vocational committee of the Spokane Valley Sunrise Rotary Club Help with the golf tournament and development committee of the Valley Partners Working with my church playground committee to erect a new playground Member the the Breakfast forum group L' Ir 1-y cI& - I, ,'C'' Y ` `T n14'T LrT Lr.s / fyr G;C2) ,/-7/6i, r) tio 147 t rai a( 7--) • 7Lc., k-.>" —� / 13 • r 7�d►'`� f�`�a Irl `�y` / 7"v� 4 Xe Gi l 4 it-74( f l 7 = _■_. harURiESMf1y-REvJEW I THURSDAY, DECEMBER 29, 2011 Stocker chase. _ • A�ylla . \SY 4,'X fr , „:„ � as . i;-- ____ . Citizen a ear ., -�� .„x-,,,,,,,,-,,„� ..] fit: # :,, _ N , _ .. _ � � #) ` I k , fel 4 _ „ „ By Nina Culver the Greater Spokane Valley _ '+ •1 .Y ` ” ti' ; 1. f r _ 1, C nine@spakesman.corn (509)927-2158 Chamber of Commerce.He will ,'°.3 r i t1 a a' f ;.7 f #II I receive his award at the - , i is'' '( ; i Former East East Valley School organization's annual gala in g ��m �1 . , ,4 District Superintendent Chick January. h tilw'� 743EMP M>.'1 K.'..-: Stocker has racked up hundreds "I was totally surprised," `4,ri'.57 .+r',r4Q�� ? a. "� of hours of volunteer time over Stocker said of hearing about I 1ft`",=„� •S �' .r.--r� 4 ," + ! 7.' the decades.Now 73,he the honor."I really have no idea j, regularly leaves his Newman who nominated me or how that ' ' , let, i `.. '- " Lake home bound for a variety came about." ' t of meetings and gatherings. Stocker,who won the In recognition of his longtime Chamber's volunteer of the year J.BART RAYNIAK The 5pekesmai-Reviev work in the community,Stocker award several years ago,said he Chuck Stocker,seen here in his Newman Lake home,has been has been named the 2011 Harry named the Harry€,Nelson Citizen of the Year by the Greater E. Nelson Citizen of the Year by See CITIZEN,8 Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce. CITIZEN Continued from I If you go views the award as The Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce recognition of his annual Gem of the Valley Gala will be at 6 p.m.Jan. community service."This 28 at the Ntiirabeau Park Hotel.Awards will be given is really a culminating for the small,medium and large businesses of the award,"he said. year as well as volunteer of the year and nonprofit of Stocker is chairman of the year.Tickets are$50.Call(509)924-4994 for the Inland Northwest reservations. Blood Center hoard of directors,serves on the Valley Hospital advisory board,is a member of the education from WSU and when St.Luke's Valley HUE board and the received his principal Rehabilitation was Chamber's education and credentials,but never used launched.East Valley's government affairs them.He was mentored Continuous Curriculum committees.He also is by his principal at Central School was begun under heavily involved in his Valley High School,Bill his leadership. church,Redeemer Ames Sr.,who "I don't know if I can Lutheran,andhas been recommended him for an say I have necessarily a involved with Spokane administration job as the favorite,"he said."There's Valley Partners and the curriculum director."One always been something Sunrise Rotary Club for day he was my boss and where I felt we have years. the next day I was his," helped make a difference. In 2010 he and wife Lu Stocker said. There are just niches led a group of volunteers His 24-year career at where I can point that to Bogota to teach women Central Valley included 13 good things happened." how to quilt."I've always as assistant But Stocker doesn't been pretty active,"he superintendent for want to be seen as a said."I'm just a great administration.He moved one-man band.He points believer in we all have to on to be superintendent of to the support of his wife give something back to the Freeman School and four grown children our community and make District for four years along with the help of it better." before taking the top job others over the years. It's a philosophy that at East Valley.He was "You don't do these kinds can be traced back to his there for seven years of things by yourself,"he youth in Snohomish, before retiring in 1998.He said."When the Wash.,where his dairy retired again in 2009 after opportunity is right and farmer father was a several years of working the correct people are regular volunteer in part-time in community involved,usually the right community activities. relations for Inland Power things happen." After Stocker graduated and Light. Stocker apparently has from Washington State There are several no plans to retire from his University and spent two highlights that Stocker community work,hut he years in the Army,it was a likes to look back on.He has learned that it is OK to philosophy that was also was involved in the early say"no"sometimes. encouraged by the Central promotion of the WSU Stocker said he tries to Valley School District, medical center.His Rotary focus his volunteer efforts where he started work as Club started a scholarship on kids,health care and a teacher.Ile earned a program.lie was on the his church."You just can't n1AcrPr'4 devree in Valley Hospital hoard do everything,"he said. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply:❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ Admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Comprehensive Plan Legislative Update — Public Participation Program GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Administrative Report on December 16, 2014 BACKGROUND: Per RCW 36.70A.130(1), every county and city in the state is required to conduct an update of its comprehensive plan and development regulations every eight years. Although the City of Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30, 2017, the City started this process in 2014. RCW 36.70A.140 of the Washington Growth Management Act requires that each city "establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program identifying procedures providing for early and continuous public participation in the development" of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff and consultants have taken the first steps to begin the update process and have developed the Public Participation Program. The program is consistent with the recommendations of the GMA which emphasize the involvement of the broadest cross-section of the community. The program outlines the general steps of how the comprehensive plan will be updated. Staff will be present to discuss the Public Participation Program. OPTIONS: Motion to approve the Public Participation Program or provide other direction. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: I move to approve the Public Participation Program. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Director and Lori Barlow, Senior Planner ATTACHMENTS: Public Participation Program Siokane ,�,,.•' Valley COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2015 UPDATE Public Participation Program Project Overview: The City of Spokane Valley is updating its Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA), governed by RCW 36.70A. The Comprehensive Plan is the City's official statement concerning its vision for future growth and development. The Plan comprises several individual elements, some of which are required and others which are optional. Annually, the City of Spokane Valley amends its Comprehensive Plan as permitted by State law. In addition to these regular amendments, the GMA requires counties and cities to periodically conduct a thorough review of their plans and regulations to keep them consistent with any relevant changes in the GMA and to accommodate updated growth targets. Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in 2006. Spokane Valley's next periodic update is required to be adopted by June 30, 2017. The City's Comprehensive Plan is outdated and needs revision to reflect the needs of our community, and the City desires to begin this process in 2015. Public Participation Objectives: The specific public participation objectives for the Comprehensive Plan update are to: 1. Enhance the quality of and support for the Comprehensive Plan through meaningful public and agency participation in the preparation of the Plan update 2. Balance the interests of our community with the interests of the State and region 3. Identify issues early and evaluate options for resolution during the planning process 4. Comply with all state laws and regulations related to public participation Public Participation Program: RCW 36.70A.140 of the Washington Growth Management Act requires that each city "establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program identifying procedures providing for early and continuous public participation in the development" of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with the recommendations of the GMA which emphasize the involvement of the broadest cross-section of the community, including the involvement of groups not previously involved, the City of Spokane Valley adopts the following program for citizen participation in the planning process: 1. Visioning Process. This process provides Spokane Valley citizens an opportunity to establish a framework and context upon which the comprehensive plan update will be based. Public and stakeholder meetings will provide the forum for the initial community visioning process. A minimum of four (4) meetings will be held at community facilities for this purpose. A draft "Vision" will be tested for consistency during the development of the Plan and updated accordingly as the community identifies priorities and implementation strategies. The ultimate "Vision" will be established at the conclusion of the planning process as a result of community participation. 2. Community Workshop. Conduct community workshop(s) to encourage citizen participation in the review and update of the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Planning Commission. The Planning Commission will evaluate information provided by the community and develop recommendations for submission to the City Council. 4. Public hearings and deliberation. Public Hearings will be held before the Planning Commission to discuss the draft Plan, take public comment, and formulate a recommendation. It is anticipated that at least one public hearing will be held by the City Council prior to adoption of the Plan. An additional public hearing will be held if substantive changes are made to the Plan document. 5. Written Comment. The public will be invited to submit written comments throughout the update process. Comments will be specifically solicited from residents, special interest organizations and business interests. Comments may be in the form of letters and other correspondence to the City regarding the Plan, or comments may be received electronically via the City's website. Staff will log in all written comments received according to the specific area of the Comprehensive Plan. Solicitation of comments will be emphasized at certain points in the update process, including during visioning, EIS scoping (if necessary), and at the issuance of the Draft Plan. 6. Communications Programs& Informational Services. As staff and budgetary resources allow, the activities will be undertaken to ensure broad-based citizen participation: a. Comprehensive Plan website — Create a dedicated webpage for the update process, which will provide necessary information to the public and will remain active for the duration of the update process. b. Comprehensive Plan e-newsletter — Circulate an e-newsletter which will update the community on planned meetings, public workshop(s) or other significant comprehensive plan events. The e-newsletter may also include requests for feedback from the community on specific topics related to the Plan. The e-newsletter will be disseminated via the City's website and emailed to a mailing list of interested parties. Hard copies will be available at City Hall as well as at certain community facilities (e.g. library). c. Interest Groups—Contact local interest groups (e.g. Chamber of Commerce, home builders, environmental groups, neighborhoods, etc.) requesting participation, and maintain a list of interested parties. Develop a database of interested parties and provide regular correspondence concerning the status of Plan development. d. Identify key resource personnel representing agencies and groups whose plans influence the development of the Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to fire districts, utilities, libraries and school districts. e. Informational Public Meetings—Conduct a series of public meetings on the preliminary draft comprehensive plan. These meetings may be in the form of a public workshop, an informational session, or other. f. Press Releases & Public Service Announcements — Work with the local newspapers, radio stations, televisions stations, and local organizations to advertise and promote significant events related to the comprehensive plan update process. g. Maintain a log of all public participation meetings, events and actions that the City engages in to provide documentation on the City's effort to meet the requirements of the GMA. Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update I Public Participation Program I 12 Public Participation Procedures: Notice Procedures The City will provide public notice of all meetings and hearings pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.70A.020, .035, and .140 and SVMC 17.80.120. Citizen Amendment Request Process The Comprehensive Plan update process will provide the opportunity for all individuals, property owners, neighborhood organizations, or others to submit an application for changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, zoning map, or development regulations pertaining to a specific property or properties. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (CARs) and will be evaluated by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. CARs are required to be submitted no later than March 31, 2015. Complete CAR applications will be reviewed and processed based upon established criteria and the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the proposal. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan periodic update process; or • Defer the CAR(s)to a future amendment docket per SVMC 17.80.140; or • Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. Plan Update and Public Meeting Schedule*: The Comprehensive Plan update process is anticipated to take more than one year to complete. The ability to proceed and adhere to the timeframe in this document is dependent upon two factors: (1) confirmation of population data from Spokane County, and (2) the scope of environmental review (i.e. whether or not an EIS will be required). Outlined below is the projected timeframe during which the update will take place. The City has chosen to take a three-phased approach; the phases generally break out as: data collection and visioning, Draft EIS and Draft Comprehensive Plan, and Final EIS and Final Draft Comprehensive Plan. As more detailed scoping takes place, the update schedule will be revised and posted to the City's webpage. Approved by Spokane Valley Council this day of , 2015. Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update I Public Participation Program I 13 Task Anticipated Timeframe Project Start-Up: Data Collection and Strategy Phase 1 Now- 1Q 2015 Community Vision EIS Scoping Phase 2 Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements 1Q 2015 - 3Q 2015 Draft EIS Final EIS 3Q 2015 -TBD Phase3 Final Comprehensive Plan Elements Council Workshops and Hearings 4Q 2015 -TBD *schedule is subject to change At certain phases of the update process, the public and stakeholders will be engaged for community visioning, consultation and informational purposes, and substantive discussions about elements of the Comprehensive Plan. At each of the public meetings, the City will encourage the public to submit comments to be considered in the update process. Below is a list of the type of each meeting, including the topic, as well as the anticipated meeting date. Task Anticipated Meeting Date L. a, o, January 2015 and February •Z VI Community Visioning 2015 cu cu 2 EIS Scoping (if necessary) May 2015 4 Preliminary Draft Plan -Open House June 2015 z Draft Plan -Open House August 2015 a Final Draft Plan -Open House October 2015 Task Anticipated Meeting Date o Citizen Amendment Request May 2015 aE Planning Commission Workshop - Draft Plan August 2015 a v Planning Commission Workshop - Final Draft Plan October 2015 Planning Commission Hearing—Recommendation December 2015 Task Anticipated Meeting Date z Citizen Amendment Request May 2015 U City Council Workshop Final Draft Plan December 2015 v City Council Workshop - Final Draft Plan 2016 City Council Hearing—Adoption 2016 *schedule and number of meetings are subject to change In accordance with RCW 36.70A.035(2)(a), if a change is proposed after the opportunity for review and comment has passed, an opportunity for review and comment on the proposed change shall be provided before the City Council votes on the proposed change. Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update I Public Participation Program I 14 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2015-17 Pool Facilities Operation and Maintenance Contract GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The City Council approved a one-year contract with four one-year renewals in 2010 with the YMCA for the Pool Facilities Operation and Maintenance Contract after initiating a formal Request for Proposals process. BACKGROUND: The City has contracted with the YMCA for the operation, maintenance and programming for the three outdoor swimming pools since 2005, but their current contract expired December 31, 2014. That recently-expired contract was divided into two parts — and administrative fee and actual expenses. In 2014 the management fee was $34,000 and actual expenses were approximately $309,000. Under Washington law for this type of contract, the City may negotiate with potential contractors on the services to be provided, and what the cost of those services will be. The YMCA is the only viable option for operating our outdoor swimming pools and they have successfully managed the previous contract. As such, staff recommends approving this new contract with the YMCA. The new proposed contract will be for one three-year term beginning in 2015 with two additional three-year renewals possible if both parties mutually agree. The management fee will be held at $34,000 for the first three-year term. OPTIONS: N/A RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Seeking consensus to place the proposed Aquatic Facilities contract on the January 27 consent agenda to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute said contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The Parks and Recreation Department General Fund budget funds the operation, maintenance and programming of our Aquatic Facilities. STAFF CONTACT: Michael D. Stone, Director of Parks and Recreation ATTACHMENTS: None CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2015 Legislative Agenda item — code enforcement lien authority GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 7.48; RCW 35.21; RCW 35.22.280; RCW 36.32.120(10) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Numerous discussions regarding proposed code enforcement lien authority Legislative changes since 2012. BACKGROUND: The City Council has for several years sought an amendment to state law so that any funds expended by a city in pursuing code compliance abatement would have a higher lien priority that is currently possible as a junior lienholder. If approved, this city lien authority would be equal to what counties already have under RCW 36.32.120(10), and would allow cities to recoup scarce public funds used to abate health and safety nuisance properties. A copy of the proposed legislative change is attached as Attachment 1. The Council adopted this proposal as part of its 2015 Legislative Agenda. Staff will travel to Olympia on January 13 and work with City lobbyist Briahna Taylor to try to make progress on getting this legislation passed. Staff will update the Council as appropriate as the Legislative session moves along. A short PowerPoint presentation will help in explaining the proposed language change, and also has pictures of a recent abatement. OPTIONS: NA RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney; Mike Jackson, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: (1) proposed draft language for amendment to RCW 35.21; (2) PowerPoint An Act Relating to assessments for nuisance abatement in cities and towns; adding a new section to chapter 35 . 21 RCW; and adding a new section to chapter 35A. 21 RCW NEW SECTION. Sec. 1 . A new section is added to chapter 35 . 21 RCW to read as follows : (1) A city or town that exercises its authority under chapter 7 . 48 RCW, RCW 35 . 22 . 280, 35 . 23 . 440, or 35 . 27 . 410, or other applicable law to abate a nuisance must provide prior notice to the property owner that abatement is pending and a special assessment may be levied on the property for the expense of abatement. The notice must be sent by regular mail . (2) A city or town that exercises its authority under chapter 7 . 48 RCW, RCW 35 . 22 . 280, 35 . 23 . 440, or 35 . 27 . 410, or other applicable law to declare a nuisance, abate a nuisance, or impose fines or costs upon persons who create, continue, or maintain a nuisance may levy a special assessment on the land or premises where the nuisance is situated to reimburse the city or town for the expense of abatement. A city or town must, before levying a special assessment, notify the property owner and any identifiable mortgage holder that a special assessment will be levied on the property and the estimated amount of the special assessment. The notice must be sent by regular mail . (3) The special assessment authorized by this section constitutes a lien against the property and is of equal rank with state, county, and municipal taxes . (4) A city or town levying a special assessment under this section may contract with the county treasurer to collect the special assessment in accordance with RCW 84 . 56 . 035 . NEW SECTION. Sec. 2 . A new section is added to chapter 35A. 21 RCW to read as follows : (1) A city that exercises its authority under chapter 7 . 48 RCW RCW 35 . 22 . 280, 35 . 23 . 440, 35 . 27 . 410 or other applicable law to abate a nuisance must provide prior notice to the property owner that abatement is pending and a special assessment may be levied on the property for the expense of abatement. The notice must be sent by regular mail . (2) A city that exercises its authority under chapter 7 . 48 RCW or other applicable law to declare a nuisance, abate a nuisance, or impose fines or costs upon persons who create, continue, or maintain a nuisance may levy a special assessment on the land or premises where the nuisance is situated to reimburse the city for the expense of abatement. A city must, before levying a special assessment, notify the property owner and any identifiable mortgage holder that a special assessment will be levied on the property and the estimated amount of the special assessment. The notice must be sent by regular mail . (3) The special assessment authorized by this section constitutes a lien against the property and is of equal rank with state, county, and municipal taxes . (4) A city levying a special assessment under this section may contract with the county treasurer to collect the special assessment in accordance with RCW 84 . 56 . 035 . " �Ililllii� PFLOPO SEL ' LEG ISLAi IVE AMENDMENT CODE COMPLIANCE LIEN PRIORITY I Existinglaw hisufficient a RCW 35.22.280(30) provides authority for cities "to declare what shall be a nuisance, and to abate the same, and to impose fines upon parties who may create, continue, or suffer nuisances to exist." D This provision does not give cities any type of lien priority to recover public money expended to abate nuisance properties. As such, those liens are considered junior liens which are wiped out on a foreclosure or bankruptcy. Lo wi l: y abatement lien authority a Pursuant to RCW 36.32.120(10), counties have higher lien authority than cities do for recouping abatement costs. a Counties "have power to declare by ordinance what shall be deemed a nuisance. . . to prevent, remove and abate a nuisance at the expense of the parties creating, causing or committing the nuisance; and to levy a special assessment on the land or premises on which the nuisance is situated to defray the cost, or to reimburse the county for the cost of abating it. This assessment shall constitute a lien against the property which shall be of equal rank with state, county, and municipal taxes. adcfitor� to f� ��V 35 . 21Ptti ' S : ' d Staff has worked to craft a proposed legislative change that would remedy this and allow cities to recoup funds expended on abatements. Proposed additional language to ROW 35F21 (1) A city which abates a nuisance pursuant to applicable law must give prior notice by regular mail to the property owner that an abatement is pending and a special assessment may be levied on the property for the expense of the abatement. (2) A city which exercises its authority under applicable law to declare and abate a nuisance, or impose fines for the same, may levy a special assessment on the property to reimburse the city for the costs of abatement. A city shall, prior to levying a special assessment, notify by regular mail the owner and any identifiable mortgage holder that a special assessment will be levied, including the estimated amount. ProPosed additional continued (3) The special assessment would constitute a lien against the property equal in rank with state, county, and municipal taxes. (4) A city levying a special assessment may contract with the county treasurer to collect the special assessment in accordance with RCW 84.56.035, relating to how taxes are collected. Pictures from a recent abatement These pictures are from the second abatement staff has had to do with this owner. The first abatement from 2012 cost over$2,700,which remains unpaid. The second abatement involved even more material, and is anticipated to cost approximately$7,000. i , MI* * I'21-- -Adif I I i: - * _ __ _ __.______, . 1 _ . i:-.. ":1:A- :: IP 4** 44, Alb 411 �+ . ------(41-4f-'2° .4, 's - #1 '-• .,., ate,0.„ . is. --.,.\\\ ; �� y I,* 'TA o4 j ...l.t.-4'4titt.1 it fi `,..44'=, �Ja c Y "._, Photos before abatement R I N , e t -. - ... l*SVA 7.,,_ vetem V . p s 4 q Photos before abatement f N / ' '': ! ' - '"' • .=-, H ilff •.-_.,____ =_ ___,,__ .-,_ .,, , `• --4 ' - •,.- ' ".-4 *-, i-* Voir- --•-•° . - . __:, ,.._ _ --.---_-Ii. N _- wcIIpi _- , 1 „0110.611 • , I Ars -11-- • Vd° 1 _ .401 ,, 4 ' - 10000.7 099 *IP"' ... , A.,"... • 4*, 112§ 712014 07 ' 28 _ 5 - 4144 - --, .- ;114 '- - Photos before abatement a F E =� 0- :_* - : -, - .„0779_______ ,.-, Wi = <„ g 'a° - t. - '1'.* 40- like-ilrfr' . -. 4. ,,, 0 YY Photos after abatement . i 4, ---,11.,-.5.15i.v.3.5_,„:,. ., r )1/4. i t.; . . --,..,„- - .- - - # I f - i _ ' „,-,-- _ ".--f.t-2"_4411r1M1111111411111M1010Mphirmr_ .„.__ - _______-_ - t- . ___,-- ilk, b - - '-'--*-. .!(..kr,.„ . -r '�P+rsz.- - ff , Photos after abatement R, 5 4 m a • +lam . - ` 3 _. _ v. a - fid 40 9 ' � _, 1114:411111111 . ,:k.:. L,-----,,ot::L:: 11010111„ ‘ _,,. —i.„..t.1,t _ _ � • e 4. Photos after abatement _' ter : ,. 1 ,_ x, r -� k m pp"� a _ e v "+.. �'.w.g• 3iE'- a "` �a�a'1..� "mss - - '* - I' .mss ,.: , # ..1* - " _ - } .. ilt 'ip ..y - x `4 — s ,� — -• -4....- + .- - _— .. }` .. _ - ,: .t r -� F _ 4 `� is �_ .gyiik m , - s ,a Photos after abatement It T..., ....,16 ,,r,-ii, , -___AP0_, i - :.:--''1 1 ' �j . .� ti # 'r Ili .. `' . ., ,r l ' w o �,' - _ "�' _ 3 tag - _ -. 4 '..r 4k ,_,=_- a miliMIP- — ,. _ iiik„ _ '''''': 14: ,Hooi.„ ,411_, _1:_,' .. _ 44 . aW. Vis 1., . .60' g a s i gt, „„ ,r Pt # , '�, ass , . '-' ti s } e .sem -. -a: p- t*,Q 6 „qi li: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Broadway Avenue Storm Drain Retrofits GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173-200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376; Storm and Surface Water Utility: SVMC 3.80; Aquifer Protection Area Fund: RCW 36.36. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan 2014-2019, May 28, 2013. BACKGROUND: The Broadway Avenue Storm Drain Retrofit is a Department of Ecology stormwater grant funded project. The intent is to retrofit or eliminate several direct-injection drywells along Broadway Avenue between Havana and Fancher Roads. City applied for Ecology stormwater grants in June 2013. Broadway was not selected during first round, but additional funding came available in May 2014 and project was awarded. Final grant documents were finalized in August 2014. Public Works coordinated design concepts with Traffic, Planning, and Economic Development Divisions which produced two options. OPTIONS: Option #1: Stormwater only retrofit project. Option #2: Enhanced project to include streetscape improvements. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Preliminary construction estimate of $1,300,000 for improvements, with up to $975,000 reimbursed by Ecology. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Power Point Presentation — Broadway Avenue SD Retrofits, Havana to Fancher BROADWAY AVENUE 0 HAVANA TO FANCHER SD RETROFIT I it- ,r0-_. .moi . �y / EB Broadway at Havana WB Broadway at Fancher Project Background 0 • State required City to perform an assessment and retrofit plan for City-owned drywells. • City staff completed the required assessment and retrofit plan in February 2013. • Broadway stormdrains discharge through drywells with no pre-treatment, targeted as a high-priority retrofit area. • Project identified in City's Stormwater CIP Project Funding Timing and Q • City applied for Ecology grant in June 2013 • Project was not selected in first round, additional funding came available in May 2014 • Grant documents finalized with Ecology in August 2014 • Grant application included preliminary construction estimate of $1,300,000 for improvements, up to $975,000 (75%) reimbursed by Ecology • Proposed schedule: • Design: Fall 2014- February 2015 • Bid/Award: March-April 2015 • Construction: April- June 2015 • Construction must be completed by June 3o, 2015 to receive reimbursement Project Development 0 • Identified stormwater improvements to meet grant requirements • City staff coordination and brainstorming meeting • Stormwater, Traffic, Capital Projects, Street Maintenance, and Economic Development Divisions discussed additional improvements • Two separate project concepts were developed: • Option # 1: stormwater only improvements • Option #2: incorporate additional streetscape improvements Option # 1 O • Stormwater improvements only • Existing drywells will be retrofitted to fulfill intent of grant • All improvements will be underground Option # 2 O Upgraded stormwater system with additional streetscape improvements • Convert existing 4-lane to a 3-lane street section • Addition of multi-use pedestrian/bike path • Installation of grassy swales and street trees • Improved Economic Development • Improved traffic safety • Optional Gateway Option # 1 StormwaterOnlyImprovements ,_,:._ 0 _ : - _ ., .,,,e, 1 'k =. m.. � '- 3 \ice. { ass � g '` \' ,-,,,,:.-w. : ' � I • jr ,,,tx. , _ tea `' ' "F ' -- :. 'Re 'tel .. _ ? y .. 7';; K Option # 1 Stormwater Design 0 • Existing drywells will be retrofitted to eliminate direct-injection and improve pre-treatment. Option # 2 Additional Streetscape Improvements 0 ,, - � 4 ,° .t`�4,,, • )'< Sia .er , . xt . ... _ __. v ,•,.. „........„ , : - , ..-•,,,„ e:::: '''' . , _ .. . - _ ,..... . . _ _ • 4 vc � E_ _.,_�eR Y -�;• : . ,. .. . , ,�� :min-y . . . i - �` g ill , Additional Benefits 0 • Streetscape Improvements • Economic Development opportunities • Traffic improvements • Multi-use path • Gateway -60' — — 4- ,,R p: —2' 2' .. 3' — 11.5' 12' _1_ —11.5' — - .i. —0'—6' MEN�I I 1 DRIVING h'U! Ill.`.-A DRIVING DRIVING LANE TRA,L LANE LANELLI w o z 7.0' — 10' o ci z z z LJ o CONCEPTUAL SECTION o W ct WESTERN HALF (FAIRGROUNDS FRONTAGE) o a Q u_ 60' .e-,.._ --s,,,,, ...„ - 2 2' 3 3' ----- - 11.5' 12' 11.5' - x,` 7�'. . ��a� r[_6 ill w IM. �i 5 i 1 j.--.-- ..II * DRIVING TURN DRIVING -dL_-I SE LANE LANE LANE T AI_ `w .-, . 7.0' - - 10'-- LLI a CONCEPTUAL SECTION EASTERN HALF (FAIRGROUNDS TO FANCHER) ,--- --c:-' ir... A Stormwater Design 0 • South Side: Approximately 17 existing drywells will be upgraded to current water quality standards with the installation of irrigated grassy swales. • North Side: Approximately 19 existing drywells will be eliminated or retrofitted with catchbasins and spill protection control to eliminate direct-injection. Economic Development Benefits 0 • Enhances the area and may increase property values • Provides bike connection to City limits • Provides a physically separated path in a high truck traffic area • Provides a distinct view of City of Spokane Valley • Design could include: • Conduit to light up trees or bushes • Gateway Sign Economic Development 0 ,\.,,v k i i le .. • ;?, I � F ix y� ''' ,r,' , Y,e MS ," ..,-. itk ,Nip, rf,eyy !4 it Appleway Landscaping Project Sprague S .4 Upgrades k=.�xr Traffic improvements 0 jor 41.1 4r' 41,/ /"Im, /ral. Traffic Safety --- • Convert 4-lane to 3-lane road section • Up to 29% crash reduction by providing center turn-lane • Broadway east of Park is 3-lane section • Broadway before/after data = 20% crash reduction • Allows center turn-lane for trucks to stack and wait for viable gaps in traffic to turn into/out of driveways • Single lane in each direction allows trucks to make right-turns into driveways without vehicles passing on the left Traffic Volumes 0 • Traffic Volumes • Capacity of 3-lane section • 14,000 - i8,000 ADT • 7,000 - 9,00o in each direction • Existing traffic volumes are comparable to other sections of Broadway • 9,40o vehicles per day (about 4,70o in each direction) • 3-lane section will accommodate future needs and growth Multi-Modal Considerations -- 00 • Bicycle and Pedestrian Traffic • Provides bicycle and pedestrian connection to City limits • Provides a physically separated path for bicycles and pedestrians • Enhances safety by providing separation from vehicle traffic • Adheres to the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan • There is currently no bus route on this segment • Not part of any existing STA long range plans Option # 1 — Pros 8z Cons 0 • Keep the current lane configuration, all stormwater improvements will be underground Pros: • Stormwater function will be upgraded to fulfill intent of Ecology grant • No change to existing traffic configuration Cons: • Project will solely improve stormwater system • Not consistent with Bike/Ped Plan • No safety improvements Option # 2 — Pros & Cons Q • Narrow existing road section to allow installation of grassy swales, street trees, and a separated trail for bike and pedestrian use Pros: • Safer pedestrian and bicycle facilities • Safer vehicle turning movements • Aesthetics/Streetscape improvements • Improved Economic Development • Decreased cost for pavement preservation project • Decreased street maintenance costs • Gateway Cons: • Added landscaping costs for maintenance of grass and trees. Initial Public Comments COQ --- • Spokane County Fairgrounds (Rich Hartzell, Director) • Expressed concern regarding impact to event traffic flow. • Recently lost access to Fancher, now exits all fair traffic to Broadway • Spokane Indians (Chris Duff, General Manager) • Interested in beautification and improved pedestrian access as long as traffic movements are not adversely affected • LB Stone Properties • Opposes narrowing street. Feels that it is an industrial area that doesn't warrant increased pedestrian access, better to keep on Sprague. Feels multiple traffic lanes better serve truck traffic. Next Steps 0 • Need Council's approval to move forward: • If Option * 1 (stormwater only improvements) is selected, staff will move forward with design • If Option #2 is selected (additional streetscape improvements), staff will move forward with public outreach Questions/Discussion DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of December 31,2014; 10:20 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council & Staff From: City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings January 13,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 5] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes,YMCA Contract) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-001 Amending Dangerous Dog Regulations—Cary Driskell(20 minutes) 3. Motion Consideration: Mayoral Appointments, Councilmembers to Committees—Mayor Grafos(15 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Beekeeping—Micki Harnois (15 minutes) 5. Admin Report: CTR Plan Update —Morgan Koudelka (15 minutes) 6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 minutes] January 20,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 12] 1. Review of Various City Marijuana Regulations and Bans Statewide -Erik Lamb (20 minutes) 2. Text Amendment,Plat Time Extension, CTA 2014-0006—Micki Harnois (15 minutes) 3. Public Works Bid Process—Eric Guth (20 minutes) 4. Street Sweeping Bike Lanes—Eric Guth 5. Governance Manual Discussion/Review—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) 6. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 75 minutes] January 27,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Tues,Jan 20] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Marijuana Moratorium—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-001 Amending Dangerous Dog Regulations—Cary Driskell (20 mins) 4. Motion Consideration: Council Approval of CTR Updated Plan—Morgan Koudelka (10 minutes) 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] February 3,2015,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Jan 26] 1.NEPA/SEPA Process—Eric Guth (30 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) February 10,2015,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Feb 2] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. First Reading Proposed Text Amendment, CTA 2014-0006—Plat Time Ext—Micki Harnois (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] February 17,2015, Special Meeting Winter Workshop (8:30 a.m.—4:30 p.m.) [due Mon, Feb 9] Tentative topics: CenterPlace State and Federal Legislative Updates City Hall Marijuana Coal Trains Sports Flex February 17, 2015—6:00 p.m. meeting cancelled in lieu of Special Workshop meeting February 18-19, 2015 AWC City Action Days Legislative Session Draft Advance Agenda 12/31/2014 10:24:41 AM Page 1 of 2 February 24,2015,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tues,Feb 17] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Text Amendment, CTA 2014-0006,Plat Time Ext—Micki Harnois (10 minutes) 3. Admin Report: Comp Plan, Site Specific Amendments—Marty Palaniuk, Christina Janssen (20 minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports March 3,2015,Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 23] 1. Accomplishments Report 2014—Mike Jackson (tentative) (60 minutes) 2. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) National League of Cities, City Conference, Washington, D.C.:March 7-11 March 10,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. (possible no meeting) [due Mon, March 2] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) March 17,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 9] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) March 24,2015,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 16] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports March 31,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 23] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 7,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 30] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 14,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 6] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 21,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 13] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 28,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 20] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports May 5, 2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 27] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Avista Electrical Franchise Marijuana,Minor in Consumption Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement Public Safety Quarterly Costs Economic Incentives Setback Requirements e-cigarettes Sidewalks and Developments Historic Preservation Spokane Regional Transportation Mgmt Ctr Draft Advance Agenda 12/31/2014 10:24:41 AM Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Commute Trip Reduction Plan Update 2015-2019 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 70.94 (Clean Air Act), RCW 82.70 (Commute Trip Reduction Incentives), RCW 47.01.440 (Goals to Reduce Annual Per Capita Vehicle Miles Travelled), RCW 70.235.020 (Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions), Governor's Executive Order 14-04 (Washington Carbon Pollution Reduction and Clean Energy Action) PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement C013-155 adopted on August 27, 2013; Ordinance No. 10-013 Adopting the City of Spokane Valley Commute Trip Reduction Plan adopted on July 27, 2010 BACKGROUND: The Council Adopted the original Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) ordinance and Plan in 2010. Subsequently, the City Manager approved the four year plan (2011-15). The State Commute Trip Reduction Board adopts its own plan every four years and local jurisdictions implement the new goals into their own plans based upon previous results from CTR surveys. These plans are approved by the local Regional Transportation Councils and the state CTR Board. This version is for 2015-2019 (mid-year to mid-year). The goals and approach to the goals have been changed significantly, warranting approval by Council. Rather than reducing drive-alone trips, the CTR plan will now set goals to increase the use of commute alternatives. The new goal is to increase the use of commute alternatives by 6% while vehicle miles travelled and greenhouse gas emissions goals will be an 18% reduction. OPTIONS: Administrative Report on January 13 and Motion Consideration to Adopt the Plan on January 27. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None. State supplied funds are transferred to Spokane County as the City contracts with the County to provide Commute Trip Reduction services and oversight over affected employers within the City of Spokane Valley. City CTR responsibilities are provided by employees with existing responsibilities. CTR responsibilities are added responsibilities. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: CTR Plan plus attachments including Goals and Targets Worksheet. Commute Trip Reduction Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 Jurisdiction: City of Spokane Valley Goals, targets and other performance measures See Goal and Target Worksheet (attached). Strategies What specific steps and strategies will you implement to meet your goal? Please include (a) policies and regulations, (b) services and facilities, and (c) marketing and incentives. Develop and implement a set of strategies that will help CTR employers achieve their goals for increasing commute alternative use and reducing vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions including, but not limited to: CTR employers will receive a commuting option board to be used specifically for promoting and encouraging transportation options. Each board has a specific spot to display the Employee Transportation Coordinator's (ETCs) name and contact information. ETCs are required to attend 15 hours of mandatory ETC training within six months of being appointed ETC. Seasoned ETCs will be encouraged to take refresher courses as needed. The comprehensive ETC training classes will be offered throughout the year and include: - ETC Orientation - Management Support - Marketing CTR/Subsidies and Incentive - MyCommute.org—online tracking calendar - Commute Finder Northwest—online ridematching tool - Transit Workshop - Annual Report Workshop - CTR Survey Workshop - Social Media for TDM - FISH Training (motivational) 1 CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 Networking opportunities will be offered throughout the year to update ETCs on CTR and transportation related issues, promotional campaigns and opportunities, incentives, events, etc. Collaborate with local agencies and organizations to enhance and improve CTR promotional efforts, media coverage, CTR events and joint projects to ensure maximum leverage and exposure. Develop and implement promotional campaigns that will encourage the use of commute alternatives. At a minimum meet annually with CTR employers to review and discuss their CTR program, review CTR survey results, strategize improvements to help employers achieve their CTR targets and goals. Require employers to make program improvements and modifications as needed based on survey results. Work collaboratively with Spokane Transit to provide updates and feedback to CTR employers on all STA projects and service improvements. Work collaboratively with the City of Spokane Valley to provide updates and feedback to CTR employers on all projects and improvements that impact and encourage walking, bicycling and transit use within the City of Spokane Valley and surrounding area. Utilize the Undriver's License station at community events and at employment sites to engage and encourage employees to make a pledge to drive less. Provide ongoing assistance to employers to enhance, strengthen and grow their CTR program. Comprehensive planning & community goals Governor's Executive Order 14-04 Washington Carbon Reduction and Clean Energy Action directs state agencies to assist local governments to update their comprehensive plans to produce travel and land- use patterns that maximize efficiency in movement of goods and people, and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. How does trip reduction support the goals of your community and comprehensive plan, and vice versa? How will you further integrate trip reduction through the updating of your comprehensive plan (e.g., parking, land use)? Creating and maintaining an expedient transportation system is one of the main goals of the City's comprehensive plan. Trip reduction reduces the need for costly infrastructure expansion and allows tax dollars to be more effectively spent on a diverse transportation system with a variety of options that is less costly to maintain. Additionally,trip reduction results in less pollution, creating a healthier environment for our public. Updates to the comprehensive plan are guided by policies. Crucial to land use development and management is having high-capacity transportation corridors, public transportation services, mixed-use T2 CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 design, and pedestrian friendly neighborhoods that all promote trip reduction. Following is a summary of elements of the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan that pursue the use of commute alternatives. Policy Topic 5—Transportation Policies 5. Local jurisdictions shall develop and adopt land use plans that have been coordinated through the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC)to ensure that they preserve and enhance the regional transportation system.These plans may include high-capacity transportation corridors and shall fulfill air quality conformity and financial requirements of Federal Transportation Laws and Regulations,the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, and the GMA. 6. Local jurisdictions shall designate within land use plans areas that can support public transportation services.These areas shall include existing as well as new development. Each jurisdiction's land use plan, the regional transportation plan and the Spokane Transit Authority's (STA) Long Range Transit Plan shall support, complement and be consistent with each other. 11. Each jurisdiction shall address land use designations and site design requirements that are supportive of and compatible with public transportation,for example: a. pedestrian-scale neighborhoods and activity centers; b. mixed-use development; and c. pedestrian friendly and non-motorized design. A return to mixed-use development will also contribute to fewer trips and fewer miles traveled as demonstrated in Chapter 2.5.4 2.5.4 Mixed-use The concept of"Mixed-use" has been around for centuries. Prior to the advent of the automobile and the proliferation of the road and highway system, Mixed-use was a predominant urban form.The "rediscovery" of this development type may be due in part to the negative impacts of sprawl,which have resulted in traffic congestion, decline in air quality, and inefficient use of resources and infrastructure. Mixed-use development CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 has several potential benefits: • Land and infrastructure resources are used more efficiently; • Pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods; • Jobs are located near housing; • Opportunities to revitalize commercial corridors; • Opportunities for infill residential development(primarily in corridors); • Encourage new housing and innovative retail that is less auto dependent;and • Compatibility with existing transit access along local corridors. The design of the urban environment as detailed in Chapter 2.7, also places a priority on elements that contribute to trip reduction, including: • Integration and linking of neighborhoods including bicycle and pedestrian facilities; • The effect of traffic patterns and parking on neighborhood character. Chapter 2.9 details the connection between land use planning and transportation and how the City can benefit from cultivating alternative forms of transportation and mitigating the impact of the automobile. 2.9.1 Street Connectivity Street design can have a significant impact on community development. It is important that neighborhoods be connected is such a manner that cars, bicycles and pedestrians can pass with ease from one neighborhood to an adjacent neighborhood via collectors and arterials. Such a pattern promotes a sense of community. All new developments should give special consideration to emergency access routes. 2.9.2 Traffic Calming Traffic calming can be defined as measures that physically alter the operational characteristics of the roadway in an attempt to slow down traffic and reduce the negative effects of the automobile.The theory behind traffic calming is that roads should be multiuse spaces encouraging social links within a community CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 and the harmonious interaction of various modes of travel (i.e.,walking, cycling, auto,transit). The following Land Use Goal and Policies align with commute trip reduction goals. LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP-2.3 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve residential neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to walking, biking and transit uses. LUP-3.3 Allow narrower public street sections that are economically viable for infill development, meet transportation,emergency access, and pedestrian needs while reducing stormwater impacts. LUP-3.4 Promote a public street network that provides connected neighborhoods for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicles. LUP-4.1 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue Regional/Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor should be concentrated at arterial intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. LUP-5.2 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. LUP-5.3 Encourage retail and personal services to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. LUP-5.7 Develop design guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in commercial,office and Mixed-use developments. LUP-5.8 Develop design guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along the street edge (where deemed appropriate)to provide pedestrian street access. LUP-7.1 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle circulation by providing public sidewalks,street trees,street furniture and other amenities. LUP-7.2 Require clear and safe pedestrian paths to enhance the pedestrian network. 5 CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 LUP-7.3 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by an identifiable walkway. LUP-7.4 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the existing and future transit system. LUP-8.2 Integrate sidewalks, bike lanes, landscaping, and area lighting in office areas to provide a safe and attractive working environment. LUP-9.1 The characteristics of a Mixed-use area should include: • Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service; • Public transit connections; • Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways; • Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches and frequent bus stops; • Multi-story buildings oriented to the street rather than parking lots; and • Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking structures. LUP-10.3 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. LUP-16.1 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects,to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to safely get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus, or car. LUP-16.2 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. LUP-16.4 Connect neighborhood services, public open space and parks with multi-modal paths. Lastly, the City has adopted a Bike and Pedestrian Master Program (Attached)and created a connected system of bikeways and sidewalks/paths to allow bike riders and pedestrians to move easily about the City. CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 Land use and transportation conditions How do existing and future anticipated land-use and transportation conditions affect CTR worksites? The City of Spokane Valley has identified several CTR related projects as a priority in the upcoming years. Council has adopted the City's Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) 2015-2019 which identifies 11 projects that will provide infrastructure improvements including sidewalks, bike lanes, multi-use paths, and pedestrian-friendly traffic signals. Nine of these projects are related entirely to the promotion of alternative transportation modes. The cost of these projects is $9,031,000. Two other projects are street projects that will add sidewalks and bike lanes to existing streets. The estimated related CTR cost of these two projects is$1,163,400. Financial plan What are the anticipated funding sources and amounts for local trip reduction, including grants and local funding? The CTR program of the City of Spokane Valley is administered by Spokane County through an interlocal agreement. State funding is allocated and based on the approved state budget and on how many affected worksites are in the City of Spokane Valley. In addition, Spokane County secures CMAQgrants to help enhance and maintain the CTR program and will continue to apply for the grants when available, approximately every three years. The following is a list of identified projects in the City's Six Year Transportation Improvement Program, including costs and funding sources. 7 CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 City Other Outside Funding Sources Full Projects Millwood Trail $ - $ 491,000 Surface Transportation Program Citywide Safety $ - $ 31,000 HSIP & QRSP Federal Sprague/Long Sidewalk $ - $ 236,000 CDBG Bowdish Sidewalk $ 58,000 $ 380,000 Safe Routes to School Park Road Sidewalk $ 63,000 $ 408,000 Safe Routes to School Appleway Trail Phase 3 $ 415,000 $ 2,659,000 Congestion Mgmt. Air Quality Millwood Trail FF to Evergreen $ 592,000 $ 3,788,000 Transportation Alternatives Appleway Trail Phase 4 $ 162,000 $ 1,038,000 Transportation Alternatives Total $ 1,290,000 $ 9,031,000 Partial Projects(Sidewalks, Bike Lanes) 50%TIB Urban Arterial Program, Mission ave. Flora to Barker $ 499,000 $ 3,198,000 50% Surface Transportation Pgm. Park Rd. #2 $ 408,000 $ 2,619,000 Surface Transportation Program 20%of Total $ 181,400 $ 1,163,400 GTEC report (if your jurisdiction has a designated GTEC) Are you continuing to implement? Optional: Describe the (a) strategies, (b) land use and transportation conditions, (c) population and employment demographics, and (d) financial plan, and how they differ from those in the CTR plan. What specific policy, service changes and land-use steps will be accomplished during this period for the GTEC area? Regional transportation planning organization CTR plan review ❑ Recommended CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 ❑ Not recommended RTPO comments: 9 I CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: 2015-2019 Commute Trip Reduction Goals and Targets Worksheet: 2015-2019 Jurisdiction: City of Spokane Valley Goals, targets and other performance measures State goals for the 2019/2020 survey period include an increase of non drive-alone travel (NDAT), and reductions of VMT and GHG. What are your percent targets for the 2019/2020 survey period? 2007-2008 Percent Change 2019-2020 NDAT 19.9% 6% 25.9% VMT 11.0 18% 9 GHG 13,645 18% 11,188 Targets: Describe how targets were set for the goals? To be completed by County Measurement: How will you measure progress toward your targets? To be completed by County Other performance measures: What other types of TDM performance goals and targets has your jurisdiction established?What are you trying to accomplish? How will you measure progress toward those goals? To be completed by County 1 I CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: State Goals and Local Targets Worksheet 2 I CTR Plan/Implementation Plan Update: State Goals and Local Targets Worksheet City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 11- BIKE AND PEDESTRIAN ELEMENT 11.0 Introduction 11.0.1 Why Plan for Bicycling and Walking? Bicycling in urban areas has grown dramatically in the last decade due to factors such as healthier lifestyles, rising fuel costs and a desire to lessen impacts on the environment. By creating safe places to ride, the development of new facility types such as bike lanes,bicycle friendly routes, and shared use paths have enabled more people to use bike transportation. In addition, as the importance of a healthy lifestyle has grown, the desire to incorporate exercise through walking has also grown. As a basic form of mobility, virtually all trips—regardless of mode—start and end with walking. The City of Spokane Valley has the essential elements to create a great place to bike and walk. Most streets connect, congestion is minimal, the terrain is flat, and weather is suitable many months of the year. For these reasons, biking and walking is a great way to get around the City. Where there are close links between home and destinations (such as school, work, and shops) walking and cycling can be the preferred and efficient way to move from place to place. Promoting walking and bicycling can help ease congestion, address weight and health issues and enhance the livability and economic vitality of our community. They help promote interaction between neighbors, strengthen connection to the community, provide `eyes-on-the-street' security, and support local retail activity. By comparison, streets and places where people are not present often feel uncomfortable and barren. Cities around the nation with the most positive economic growth and solid resources from tourism, general retail and other sources are places where people can come and feel comfortable. 11.0.2 Overview As an element of the City of Spokane Valleys Comprehensive Plan, this chapter is organized to present background data concerning bike and pedestrian facilities (Section 11.1), applicable federal, state and local codes relating to the topic(section 11.2), and a set of goals and objectives (section 11.3). Section 11.4, contains city-wide bike and pedestrian facility improvements, potential education, enforcement and evaluation tools. As a policy document, this chapter will guide decisions regarding multi-modal transportation facilities. As an implementation tool, it will detail priorities and standards for development. 11.0.3 Vision Statements To increase opportunities for non-motorized transportation that improve the connectivity, safety, convenience and attractiveness of the pedestrian and bicycle network in the City of Spokane Valley. To identify and prioritize facility recommendations based on thorough data collection and analysis, community visioning, regional collaboration, engineering assessment and preliminary cost estimates. 11.0A Process Several steps were involved in creating the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program. a. Data Collection A comprehensive field inventory of existingbicycle and pedestrian facilities was conducted, identifying constraints and opportunities for improvements. The City coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions as well as bike, pedestrian and health advocates, property owners and other stakeholders. This step incorporated a thorough review of the existing adopted Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, including a review of the bike facility map, goals and policies related to bike and walking activity, as well as a review of recently approved similar Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 1of18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan plans in the region. Accident data and funding sources for potential future projects were also gathered. A sidewalk inventory completed by students at Washington State University (WSU)was added to the City's GIS system. b. Public Outreach This Bike and Pedestrian Master Program (BPMP) was created over a year and a half period with participation from a diverse group of citizens, residents and interested parties. A contact database was created to ensure interested parties were notified throughout the development of the plan. Over 900 contacts were included within five months of initiation. The first in a series of BPMP workshops was held on June 16, 2010. A diverse group voiced opinions and concerns on bicycling and walking in the City. Through an interactive exercise, the participants identified destinations, obstacles, and preferred routes for bike and pedestrian facilities. An on-line survey was made available through the City's web page. Over 350 responses were received from the online survey, indicating a significant level of interest. The short, non-statistical survey gathered additional insight into the biking and walking experience in Spokane Valley and into desired routes and destinations. c. Connectivity Assessment and Route Recommendations From the gathered data, a preliminary connection assessment and potential route recommendations were developed. Details of existing rights-of-way, pavement width, driveway approaches and traffic counts were gathered. d. Continued Public Outreach A second community workshop was held on September 19, 2010 to present preliminary bike and pedestrian routes and connections based on the information gathered at the first workshop and through the on-line survey. The Spokane Regional Health District presented information on health impacts associated with alternative modes of transportation. By prioritizing potential projects, participants helped create a vision of,a comprehensive bike and pedestrian network. The workshops were publicized online, at schools, bike shops and community facilities throughout the City. In addition, staff prepared newsletters and maintained a BPMP page on the City of Spokane Valley website. Quarterly updates were presented to the City Council as part of the Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant (EECBG) status reports. e. Safety Analysis and Prioritization of Improvements A portion of money from the City's EECBG funded an engineering consultant to review the proposed routes for safety, cost and prioritizations. This engineering assessment provides technical guidance to help ensure that proposed bike and pedestrian facilities, such as bike lanes on arterials or shared use paths in neighborhoods, are safe, functional, and appropriate for the set route. f. Plan Refinement, Review and Adoption Desired routes were refined based on technical input from the consultant. Classifications for both bicycle and pedestrian facilities were reviewed based on the American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) guidelines and industry standards. Comprehensive Plan text, maps and exhibits were prepared. Priorities and preliminary implementation schedules were included. Additional workshops were held to gather input on the draft BPMP document. Finally, the BPMP was presented to both the Planning Commission and the City Council. 11.0.5 Bike and Pedestrian Master Plan Technical Advisory Group Developing the BPMP resulted in, partnerships and collaboration between the City, adjoining jurisdictions and many other interested agencies and individuals. Representatives from many of these groups served on the Bike and Pedestrian Technical Advisory Group(BPTAG). The BPTAG Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 2 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan met several times to review and make recommendations on potential routes, facilities and implementation strategies. 11.0.6 Partnerships Preparation of the BPMP has involved a wide range of people and agencies. Partnerships and collaboration contributes to the quality and integrity of the program. Maintaining these partnerships will contribute toward successful implementation and realization of shared goals. a. Spokane Regional Health District The Spokane Regional Health District (SRHD) serves as the area's public health leader and partner in protecting and improving the health of the community. The Health District's Physical Activity program works with community coalitions, elected officials, citizen groups and other organizations to encourage policies that make it easier for people to be physically active. An analysis of existing social, economic and health statistics of the residents of the City of Spokane Valley was prepared by the SRHD epidemiologist. The role of SRHD was to bring awareness of the positive health impact bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure can have on a community. b. School Districts and Safe Routes to School Safe Routes to School is a national program aimed at enabling community leaders, schools and parents across the country to improve safety and encourage more children to be active by safely walking and bicycling to school. In the process, work associated with Safe Routes to School contributes to reducing traffic congestion, improving physical health, and making communities more livable overall. The SRHD along with the City, Bicycle Alliance of Washington, Central Valley School District, East Valley School District, and West Valley School District worked diligently through the 2010/2011 school year to prepare walking audits of all elementary and middle schools. Walking audits are detailed surveys of streets and sidewalks within a one-mile radius surrounding a school using the Safe Walk and Bike Routes:A Guide for Planning and Improving Walk and Bike to School Options for Students (site: WSDOT and WTSC 2010). Results of the audits are used to prepare preferred walking routes for students and to identify and prioritize street and sidewalk safety projects. Continued coordinated efforts between school districts, SRHD and the City will aid in the successful implementation of safe routes for pedestrians of all ages. c. Spokane Transit Authority The Spokane Transit Authority(STA) is a regional public transportation agency providing a variety of transportation options, including bus service to the City of Spokane Valley. The 111 transit system effectively expands the area that pedestrians are able to access for daily services and activities. STA's database of pedestrian paths throughout its service area was used as base data for the City's sidewalk inventory,gap analysis and recommended pedestrian network. The data identified barriers to people using the sidewalk network to access the bus system. d. Bicycle Alliance of Washington The Bicycle Alliance of Washington is a non-profit organization advocating for bicyclists and bike-friendly communities throughout Washington. The Alliance works toward increasing the percentage of all types of bicycle riders and increasing funding available for inclusive, non-motorized transportation facilities. The Alliance works closely with Safe Routes to School programs and serves as a clearinghouse for bicycle education and advocacy. e. Washington State University In 2007, Washington State University Interdisciplinary Design Institute (WSU) created a pedestrian model by mapping pedestrian networks throughout Spokane Transit Authority's service area, identifying barriers such as the absence of sidewalks and curb ramps, and non-ADA compliant variations in the surface condition, height, width, and slope of Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11—Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 3 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan pedestrian facilities. The data has been used to identify existing routes and to determine sidewalk infill priorities. By partnering with the City, data developed through the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program will be used to update the WSU pedestrian network model. In turn, the model will be useful in prioritizing pedestrian improvements in an effort to increase safety throughout the City. f. Spokane Regional Transportation Council The Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) is the local metropolitan planning organization encouraging coordination and collaboration between planning and transportation departments throughout the region. SRTC maintains the Transportation Improvement Program, a three-year list of state and federally-funded transportation projects, and the Metropolitan Transportation Plan in Spokane County, a document addressing transportation needs for the next 20 years. SRTC recognizes that walking and bicycling are simple and efficient modes of travel that can increase public transit ridership. Coordination between the City and SRTC will create opportunities to implement effective non-motorized projects and programs. 11.1 Planning Context The Bike and Pedestrian Element of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan expands on the Transportation Element to focus on non-motorized transportation. Also referred to as the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program, this element is consistent with the overall Comprehensive Plan, specifically the Land Use, Transportation, Parks and Recreation and Neighborhood Elements. 11.1.1 GMA The Washington Growth Management Act(GMA), the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)and the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) provide for the inclusion of non-motorized transportation elements in comprehensive plans. Bike and pedestrian planning is sometimes included in the land use, transportation or recreation elements. Using a separate element to address opportunities and constraints specific to these non-motorized forms of transportation allows the City of Spokane Valley to focus on improvements that enhance the livability and economic vitality of our community. 11.1.2 County-Wide Planning Policies County Wide Planning Policies (CWPP) provide a policy framework for the County and its respective cities. Specifically items 10 and 16 under Policy Topic 5—Transportation, state: 10. Each jurisdiction should coordinate its housing and transportation strategies to support existing, or develop new, public multimodal transportation systems. 16. Each jurisdiction shall address energy consumption/conservation by: a. Designing transportation improvements for alternatives to the single-occupant vehicle; b. Locating and adopting design standards for new development to support pedestrian or non-motorized travel; c. Providing regulatory and financial incentives to promote efforts of the public and private sector to conserve energy;and d. Reducing the number of vehicle miles traveled and number of vehicle trips. As described in Section 11.0.6 above, the SRTC is the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the Spokane region. SRTC maintains the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), a 20-year strategy to meet the transportation needs of the region. MTP goals related to non-motorized transportation include: ® Establishing a bicycle and pedestrian program that will increase the mode-share of people walking and bicycling as a means of transportation over the next 20 years; ® Eliminating barriers that discourage or prohibit pedestrian or bicycle access; Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11—Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 4 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan • Identifying the needs and gaps in the regional bicycle and pedestrian system; and ® Encouraging connections between residential areas and adjacent land uses to enhance awareness and cooperation between all roadway users. The MTP facilitated the creation of three complementary products: the Spokane Regional Bike Plan (adopted in 2008); the Spokane Regional Pedestrian Plan (adopted in 2009) and the SmartRoutes program. All of these were collaborative efforts with SRTC, the Spokane Regional Health District, the Active Transportation Technical Committee(including representatives from the City of Spokane Valley and other cities and towns) and a citizen-based steering committee. Each of these documents encourages jurisdictions to tailor the regional plans to their own needs and to use them for guidance to develop appropriate bicycle and pedestrian projects that traverse jurisdictional lines. 11.2 Existing Setting 11.2.1 Comprehensive Plan The City of Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies to guide development within the City. All elements within the Comprehensive Plan must be internally consistent. Goals found within other elements encourage the development and implementation of a bike and pedestrian system within the City. The following are from the Land Use, Transportation, Natural Environment and the Parks and Recreation elements: Land Use-Goal LUG-7 Provide a balanced transportation network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehicles,pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles and integrated parking. Transportation-Goal TG-9 Enhance community livability and transportation by encouraging a connected system of pedestrian and bicycle ways that is integrated into a coordinated regional network. Natural Environment-Goal NEG-20 Support regional efforts to improve air quality. Parks and Recreation-Goal PRG-4 Based upon budgetary resources, promote, develop, operate and maintain a comprehensive trail/bicycle system within Spokane Valley that provides non-motorized travel (walking, bicycling, skating, and horseback riding)to meet city residents recreation,fitness and commuting needs. 11.2.2 Current Activity a. Collision Data The Washington State Department of Transportation maintains records of pedestrian and bicycle collision data. Between 2003(incorporation)and 2010, there were six fatalities and 295 serious or disabling injuries in Spokane Valley associated with pedestrian and bicycle collisions. On average, there are 41 pedestrian and bicycle collisions per year. The majority of the collisions occurred on major arterials including Argonne, Pines and Sullivan Roads. It is estimated that many bicycle and pedestrian collisions have happened but have not been reported. b. Citizen Input To ensure the bike and pedestrian system reflects the community's desires, an extensive outreach component was built into the process. As described in the previous section, this process included workshops and an on-line survey. The results showed that a majority of respondents walk or bicycle for exercise/health, enjoyment, or to commute to work/school. J When asked what prevents a person from biking or walking, an overwhelming 70% of the Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 5 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan respondents said it was due to the lack of facilities. The results showed the community's desire to see improved bike and pedestrian facilities in or around the following six routes: 1. Sprague Avenue 2. Pines Road 3. 32nd Ave/Dishman Mica 4. Argonne/Mullan corridor 5. Valleyway Avenue (as a bicycle friendly route) 6. Sullivan Road Many mentioned the need for more north/south connections to the Centennial Trail. The preferred facilities were bike lanes and shared use paths. The graphs below illustrate the respondent's views. Why do you bike or walk? Note:Respondents were asked to check all that apply 94% 89% 58% 55% 35% , 9% 3% 4% i e`o�•e �� Sc)\�\ Q•\�� dot �0 �o�e f oQ o° ••o o0 5s fib` p O Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 6 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive B3 What prevents you from biking or walking? Note:Respondents were asked to check all that appy, 70% ) 57% ( q& @ !I2a z_ \ 26% 26% — g 14% 13% 17% 1 \ i _l ' < \ . _ 1 1— — \ ? »� . . �. z , 6% k. Z' ' [ . . � . . � %�$ 95! & , ®� �\� & � 00 .R. �6 « $ w d 3° ,6 ` _ �` o o A C e ` e J « 9 Where would you like to be abet me I or walk? Note:Responses were tallied fromgeli qualitative data 23% ) 21% 21% 1 , ( 1 ) \ 1 11 ) 5% 5% 5% 14% 45- l 2% 2% 2% 2% .. . . . .... .:\ ... \ �.. .. .. .« ) K ] 1% ' 1% § ` t t ` \ ) r� ry - ) , . , .. A c o a ° c �` ° �� ~ *� � co �` � � Cco\$� Adopted 10-25-2011 (U/ated0 Q¢2013) Chaptr11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 7 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Which roadways are difficult for bicyclists or pedestrians? Note:Responses were tallied from qualitative data 24% 1 17% 16% 10% [ [5% 02% 3% 3% 3/0 3% 3% 3%1% 1% 1% 1%�.: syr1_6% �a. PQe\e�aP�40 0.,,txcs b, �a•��p„2„§-c,e�c,q),�\�,e,03 60�e�\yy\oo Qa Q\ce�Q`�AJ c33. 2�'`\ J.,,e,,e a� 5r O` What bicycle and pedestrian facilities do you prefer? Note:Respondents were asked to check all that apply 78% 62% I 51% . II 36% 1 • I 1 7. Bike Lanes Shared Use Paths Signed,Shared Bicycle Boulevard Roadways Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 8 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Which of the following programs would you like to see implemented? Note:Respondents were asked to check all that apply 87% 1 { 66% i 1 55% I 47% 46% 36% i1 34% 28% fI r"' 1 ,,,-: fj 1 I N. 5 sO 5 ary a�`°� copy �e� cP .°� �� c'•-'e • 9racea Q Jam\\°P ea��c °�Fe Q`eccc� °��o szs a o q-o e.. a'` c. Health Data As part of the initial community workshops, the SRHD prepared information correlating active lifestyles, including bicycle and pedestrian commutes, to improved health. Sedentary lifestyles can contribute to obesity. Obesity can be defined as a person with a body mass index of 30 or greater. Obesity can contribute to illnesses including heart disease and strokes, high blood pressure, osteoarthritis, diabetes and some forms of cancer. Lack of physical activity increases health risks, resulting in increased costs for medical care, worker compensation and lost productivity. Obesity and lack of activity contribute to chronic diseases including cancer, heart and respiratory disease. The top five causes of death in Spokane Valley are shown below: Literature reviews have shown that urban design and land use policies creating opportunities for physical activity within communities have been effective and are considered best practices for increasing a community's health and reducing obesity. More than half of Spokane County's carbon monoxide emissions are from vehicle sources. Reducing vehicle trips by accommodating and encouraging active transportation can positively impacts health by improving air quality. SRHD also considers socio-economic factors as they relate to health. A link exists between education, poverty, and mobility choices. In Spokane Valley, between 2004 and 2008, 37.4 percent of the population had less than a high school diploma or GED. The amount of education a person achieves influences their ability to earn a certain standard of living. Between 2004 and 2008, 43.9 percent of the City's population was at or below the 200 percent federal poverty level. That is more than twice the national average. A substantial percentage of the population either cannot afford automobile transportation, or affording it is a financial hardship. For these people, in addition to the young in age and the older population, getting around by other alternatives such as walking, bicycling or transit is a necessity. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 9 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 11.2.3 Existing Bicycle System Though developed as a compilation of rural townships over time, the City of Spokane Valley has a strong grid pattern of streets. The placement of principal and minor arterials, collectors and local access streets overlaid on the relatively flat topography provides an excellent base for non- motorized transportation. a. Types of Bicycle Users There are many types of bicyclists with varying skills and levels of comfort in terms of riding in traffic.While bicyclists can be loosely categorized as experienced adult, casual adult and child cyclists, there are many levels of cycling competency and just as many opinions as to what makes an ideal bike route. Some experienced cyclists ride on busy arterial streets regardless of bicycle facilities. Some cyclists will ride on busy roads only if bike lanes are provided. Some will use the lanes only if parallel residential roads are unavailable. b. Existing Bicycle Facilities A combination of striped bike lanes, posted bicycle friendly routes and separated bike facilities are found throughout the City. In addition, other streets act as informal routes, favored bybicycle commuters as safe and convenient alternatives to bike ways with heavy automobile traffic. The following different types of bicycle facilities, as defined by the American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials_(AASHTO) are found throughout Spokane Valley: i. Shared Use Path: Facilities on separated right-of-way and with minimal cross flow by motor vehicles. Minimum width is six feet; optimal width is ten feet. Shared use paths may also be used by pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users, joggers and other non- motorized users. The Centennial Trail is an example of a shared use path in the City. With connections through adjacent jurisdictions, it is an important regional recreational and commuting facility. Other shared use paths exist along the south side of Appleway Avenue from Sprague Avenue to the eastern City boundary and on Sullivan Road,from Centennial Trail to just south of Trent Road. ii. Bike Lanes: A portion of a roadway designated by striping, signing and pavement markings for the preferential or exclusive use by bicyclists. The required width of a bike lane on a given street varies based on several factors, such as existence of a gutter and curb. Parking and traffic volume must be considered as well. AASHTO and SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) guidelines recommend that for a street without gutter or curb, the minimum width of the bike lane should be four feet. If the 1111 street includes curb and gutter, the minimum width should be five feet. In situations where parking is permitted without any striping; or stalls, AASHTO guidelines recommend an 11-foot bike lane width. Bicycle lanes improve conditions for cyclists of all abilities within a given corridor and encourage increased bicycle use by providing a greater degree of comfort and perceived safety for less skilled cyclists. Striped bicycle lanes are located along several arterials, including 32nd Avenue, portions of Broadway, Evergreen Road, Mission Road, Sprague Avenue and 16th Avenue. Mirabeau Parkway from Pines Road to Indiana Avenue and Indiana Avenue from Mirabeau to Evergreen Road are also improved with bike lanes. iii. Signed Shared Roadway: Signed lane allowing both vehicular and bicycle traffic. Minimum width is 14 feet. Signed shared roadways indicate to cyclists that there are particular advantages to using these routes compared to alternate routes. In the City of Spokane Valley, signed shared roadways exist on 41h Avenue from University to Conklin, and on Trent from Flora to the eastern city boundary. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 10of18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan iv. Shared Roadway: Lane allowing both vehicular and bicycle traffic. No signing is involved. ® All public streets in the City of Spokane Valley can be defined as shared roadways. Existing bike facilities in the City of Spokane Valley are shown in Map 11.1. Other bicycle facilities found throughout the City include bicycle parking facilities at some commercial, public and office facilities and bicycle racks on transit vehicles. c. System Deficiencies Barriers surrounding both recreation and commuting bicycle activity throughout the City include crossing Interstate 90, railroad tracks, and the Spokane River. Currently, principal arterials cross these barriers. 'However, the limited space for bike facilities on these arterials plus the traffic volume hinders the safety and comfort for many riders. This impacts those trying to access commercial and employment centers in the north part of the City as well as those trying to access the Centennial Trail. Other factors impacting bicycle activity include impaired sight distances, limited street connectivity, cyclist and motorist behaviors, lack of way-finding signs,and maintenance issues. 11.2.4 Existing Pedestrian System a. Types of Pedestrians For trips of a certain length, walking is a simple affordable way to get around. Spokane Valley, with relatively flat terrain and a predominately grid street pattern, has great opportunities for pedestrians of all kinds. People choose to walk for many reasons including recreation and necessity. Pedestrians include adults, children, seniors, people without cars and people with disabilities. Those with higher levels of transportation choice, i.e. those specifically able to afford cars and of driving age, make use of autos for most trips. This situation is not so much a reflection of popular transportation preferences but of the many auto-dominated land use and transportation decisions that created present day Spokane Valley. Citizens, including those driving cars as well as seniors, youth and people with disabilities, need safety, connectivity and accessibility. b. Existing Pedestrian Facilities Sidewalk inventories were performed by City staff as part of the analyses conducted for the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program and the American with Disabilities Act transition plan. Also, in association with the Safe Routes to School program,volunteers from all elementary and middle schools in the City conducted walking audits to determine potential routes to their schools and to identify missing sidewalk segments, potential pedestrian conflicts and existing safe haven areas for students. The existing pedestrian system in Spokane Valley includes sidewalks, shared use paths, wide shoulders on rural roads and residential streets. Generally,sidewalks exist on most of the existing arterials and range in width from three to six feet. In addition, most streets surrounding elementary, middle and high school facilities are improved with sidewalks. Several shared-use paths, intended for all types of non-motorized transportation, are located throughout the City (see section on existing bicycle facilities above). Map 11.3 shows locations of existing sidewalk facilities. Other infrastructure associated with pedestrian activity,includes curb ramps, intersection markings, cross walks with and without associated signals, benches and shelters for transit facilities, and street trees. c. System Deficiencies: For the most part, sidewalks on arterials are constructed adjacent to the curb and lanes where cars are traveling in excess of 30 and 40 miles per hour, impacting pedestrian comfort and safety. In addition, while current development standards,require separated sidewalks,there are portions where sidewalks were not built with initial street construction. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11-Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 11 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Other factors making walking difficult include crosswalk issues on high-volume streets, obstructions such as power poles and utility boxes in the sidewalk, outdated or non-existent curb ramps, poor lighting, limited facilities at transit stops, and maintenance issues. 11.3 Goals and Policies Spokane Valley is intended to become a bicycle and pedestrian friendly City, where bicycling and walking are encouraged and promoted as safe and convenient forms of transportation and recreation. Goals help guide actions towards fulfilling this vision. Policies are more specific statements relating to implementing measures that will achieve the goals. As with many cities, Spokane Valley has limited funds with which to pursue its bike and pedestrian goals. Focused and prioritized resources will aid the City in having a positive impact on non- motorized transportation infrastructure. The City will strive to make strategic investments of the limited resources available and where possible, leverage resources in cooperation with other governmental and private agencies. The following goals and policies are consistent with the goals and policies of other chapters of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, with the Countywide Planning Policies and the Growth Management Act. Network and Facilities Goal&Policies Goal BP-1 Provide a comprehensive bikeway and pedestrian system connecting residential neighborhoods with parks, schools, commercial areas, trails, and employment areas within the City and to adjacent jurisdictions. Policies BP-1.1 Encourage bike lanes, shared use paths and sidewalks throughout the City where applicable and appropriate. BP-1.2 Encourage bicycle parking facilities at commercial and public facilities as well as at places of employment. BP-1.3 Work with Spokane Transit Authority to develop safe, comfortable and secure pedestrian amenities and bicycle parking facilities at transit stops as well as bike racks on transit vehicles. BP-1.4 Encourage sidewalks, bicycle facilities and shared use paths as part of development where applicable. BP-1.5 Encourage landscaping, bollards and other treatments with new streets, parking lots and other pedestrian activity zones to create an effective safety and visual buffer between the sidewalk and the street. BP-1.6 Coordinate on regional non-motorized efforts in partnership with adjoining jurisdictions and with the Spokane Regional Transportation Council. BP-1.7 Pursue joint funding applications for implementation that will expand the regional bikeway and pedestrian network. BP-1.8 Strive to maintain access for pedestrians, bicycles and emergency response vehicles when a street closure or a vacation request is processed. BP-1.9 Encourage the use of technological advances to provide a safe, user friendly bicycle and pedestrian network. BP-1.10 When considering alternative modes of transportation, priority should be placed on providing sidewalks for children particularly in areas near parks and schools. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11-Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 12 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Safety and Accessibility Goal and Policies Goal BP-2 Reduce the number of bicycle and pedestrian injuries through development of safe and accessible routes for bicyclists and pedestrians of all ages and abilities. Policies BP-2.1 Encourage bicycle and pedestrian facilities to meet nationally recognized design standards for safety and accessibility, such as AASHTO. BP-2.2 Encourage bicycle routes and shared use paths to be properly signed and marked to address personal safety. BP-2.3 Encourage safe bicycle and pedestrian crossings of major arterials, railroads, I- 90 and the Spokane River through use of innovative treatments where appropriate. BP-2.4 Encourage the enforcement of pedestrian and bicycle safety rules on City streets and bikeways. Promotion and Education Goal and Policies Goal BP-3 Implement comprehensive education and encouragement programs targeted at all populations in the City. Policies BP-3.1 Continue coordinating with existing agencies and programs, including the Spokane Regional Health District, the Safe Routes to Schools program, the Police Department, SCOPE, the Commute Trip Reduction program and other entities concerned with bicycle and pedestrian safety, to create education programs focused on safe bicycle riding,walking and motorist activity. BP-3.2 Provide current and easily accessible information about the bicycle and pedestrian networks, programs and facilities. Implementation, Funding and Maintenance Goal and Policies Goal BP-4 Seek funding from all available sources to implement and maintain bicycle and pedestrian facilities as well as ongoing education and enforcement. Policies BP-4.1 Maintain a prioritized and phased implementation plan that takes into consideration the scope, cost and benefits of a facility, and available funding opportunities. BP-4.2 Where feasible, include facilities as described in this Bike and Pedestrian Element as part of the annual Transportation Improvement Program (TIP). BP-4.3 Review and monitor opportunities for multi-modal grant funding as they become available. BP-4.4 City should strive to maintain quality street surfaces that provide a safe environment for vehicles and cyclists. BP-4.5 Ensure internal coordination between departments prior to developing street projects that include bike and/or pedestrian facilities. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11—Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 13 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan BP-4.6 Use Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding to facilitate the construction of safer pedestrian routes serving low and moderate-income neighborhoods throughout the City of Spokane Valley. BP-4.7 Direct the use of the CDBG funds for the benefit of citizens in low and moderate- income neighborhoods to develop pedestrian connections that would provide public transit access to critical services for these citizens and pedestrian routes that enable children to safely walk to school in these neighborhoods. 11.4 Bike and Pedestrian Master Program 11.4.1 Engineering Improvements a. Overall Bicycle and Pedestrian Network The City of Spokane Valley Bike and Pedestrian Master Program is based on field data, citizen input and engineering analysis of constraints and opportunities for bicycle and pedestrian facilities. It should be noted that this is a master program, not a detailed feasibility analysis. As such, exact routing and designations could be modified during the course of more detailed studies of specific projects. The recommended bikeway network is shown in Map 11.2 and recommended pedestrian network is shown in Map 11.4. Map 11.5 shows the recommended travel ways for the schools that participated in the safe routes to school exercise. b. Possible Engineering Solutions The specific types of bike and pedestrian treatments that are applied to roads vary depending on the existing right-of-way, traffic counts, traffic speeds, roadway cross sections, number of approaches or driveways on the street and topography. A brief description of bicycle treatments is provided below. More specific design guidelines including the complete toolbox and typical cross section layouts are found in Appendix 2: Facility Design Guidelines. i. Bicycle Friendly Routes—Bicycle friendly routes are roadways with low speeds and low volumes. The treatments recommended for bicycle routes should strive to improve through movements for bicyclists and other non-motorized modes. Bicycle route treatments are ideal on two-lane roadways where traffic volume is less than 3,000 vehicles per day (although less than 1,500 vehicles per day is preferred) and posted speeds of 25 miles per hour or less. See Appendix 2 for specific bicycle friendly route treatments and cross sections. ii. Bicycle Lanes - Bicycle lanes designate an exclusive part of the roadway(typically on the right side of the roadway) to be used by bicyclists only. A bike lane is typically located between the right most traffic lane and the curb or on street parking area.A bicycle lane should be considered on roadways with traffic volumes greater than 3,000 vehicles per day or posted speeds greater than 25 miles per hour.Appendix 2 includes a variety of bicycle lane treatments from a standard bike lane to buffered bike lanes and climbing lanes. The appendix also includes cross sections showing how bike lanes could be applied to existing City roadways. iii. Cycle Tracks -A cycle track is an exclusive bike facility separated from vehicle traffic and the sidewalk, and is intended to provide improved comfort and safety for the bicyclist as compared to an on-street bike lane. The cycle track can be separated from vehicle traffic using a variety of treatments (curbs, planter strips, on-street parking, pavement markings, or other options). In addition, the cycle track should be clearly defined from sidewalks (grade separated, pavement markings, or an alternate clear indication)to prevent bicycle conflicts with pedestrians. A cycle track requires a wider cross section than a typical bike lane, but should be considered on roadways where bicyclists may not feel comfortable biking directly adjacent to vehicle traffic. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11—Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 14 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan iv. Shared Use Paths—Shared use paths are physically separated from the roadway and are intended for use by pedestrians, bicyclists, runners and other non-motorized users. Shared use paths supplement bike lanes, bicycle friendly routes and sidewalks and connect to these other facilities at ends of the path as well as midway, depending on the length and location. The number of driveways and crossings should be minimized when designing a shared use path. Generally, if there are more than eight crossings per mile, an on-street facility should be considered instead. v. Bicycle Intersection Treatments - Intersection treatments improve the safety of bicyclists through an intersection (typically a signalized intersection). Depending on the characteristics of the cross streets (traffic and bicycle volumes, traffic and bicycle speeds, type of bicycle facility, number of vehicles and/or bikes turning, visibility, surrounding land use, and other factors) a range of treatments may be applicable. Appendix 2 provides specific intersection treatment guidelines and criteria. vi. Mid-Block Crossing Treatments - Mid-block crossings can be dangerous for bicyclists because drivers are not typically expecting a crossing at a non-intersection location. The need for a mid-block crossing may arise if two bicycle facilities are off-set or if a trail intersects a roadway at mid-block. In these situations, mid-block crossing treatments can be applied to improve the safety. vii. Wayfinding - Wayfinding is meant to be used by bicyclists while en route to communicate directions, distance and sometimes expected travel time to a particular destination. Wayfinding is typically accomplished through the use of signs supplemented at times with pavement markings. Wayfinding can be beneficial to all types of bicycle facilities. viii. Prioritization Criteria—Bicycle Network The overall bicycle and pedestrian networks will be implemented over time. The criteria contained in Appendix 1 has been used to determine where to focus available funding and staff time to implement bicycle facility projects. Priority is given to those projects anticipated to serve the most number of people and to contribute to overall safety. ix. Prioritization Criteria—Pedestrian Network The criteria contained in Appendix 1 was used to determine where to focus available funding and staff time to implement pedestrian facility projects. Priority is given to those projects anticipated to serve the most number of people and to contribute to overall safety. x. Network Improvements Facility improvements, summarized in Appendix 1, are categorized as short-term and long-term projects based on need and ease of implementation. 11.4.2 Ancillary Facilities Ancillary facilities add to the safety and comfort of using walking and bicycling as modes of transportation. Ancillary facilities can include bicycle parking,showers and lockers,transit features and bicycle and pedestrian maps. Crosswalk design can aid in increasing visibility through the use of specific striping patterns and lights. The following methods address ancillary features: a. Pedestrian Features: Encourage that pedestrian crossing facilities, including crosswalks and signage,alert both motorists and pedestrians to the presence of the facility.Work with developers and utilities to remove existing hazards such as light poles and utility boxes from the sidewalk. Where appropriate, constrain roadway width Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11-Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 15 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan with bulb-outs and tighter right turns at intersections to slow vehicles as they approach areas with high pedestrian volumes. Provide sidewalks or pedestrian paths between neighborhoods and commercial or public destinations where appropriate. Encourage clearly identified safe walking paths between public sidewalks and commercial buildings. b. Bicycle Parking: Continue to require bicycle racks for new development. Consider developing standards for the size of bicycle parking spaces, clearance, aisles, signs, anchoring, non-interference with pedestrian circulation, and weather protection. c. Shower and Locker Facilities: Continue to coordinate with Spokane County Commute Trip Reduction program to encourage shower and locker facilities as tenant benefits and to encourage employers to consider partnering with nearby gym facilities for use of existing shower facilities. d. Transit Features: Continue as an active partner with the Spokane Regional Transportation Council and the Spokane Transit Authority to encourage the accommodation of bike lockers and bikes on transit vehicles. 11.4.3 Education and Encouragement Unfortunately, too many bicyclists in the United States lack the basic skills or knowledge to safely ride a bicycle in traffic. Many people are afraid of bicycling on streets. Bicycle education programs are designed to increase bicycle safety by improving the ability to ride with traffic as well as improve motorist awareness. The difficulties faced in helping people develop this skill and knowledge stems from the wide range of age groups that require this training and the necessity to tailor the programs to each group. Bicycle education programs should be directed at children bicyclists, adult bicyclists and motorists. The following methods address education and encouragement: a. Child Education and Encouragement: In conjunction with the Health District, school districts and other interested organizations, encourage development of bicycle education programs for several age groups or use existing programs that have demonstrated effectiveness. Programs could be incorporated into existing summer parks programming and existing school programming. Programs could include bicycle helmet safety information, maintenance and repair, safe riding habits and bicycle rides. More specifically, students in grades K-3 could be taught basic pedestrian skills, stranger danger, crossing residential streets, using pedestrian push buttons and taking a school bus. Older students in Grades 4 to 5 could learn bike safety and handling skills, including bike operation on streets with supervised bike rides on neighborhood streets. Later, in Grades 7-9, students could learn basic mobility skills of how to get around town including using transit for utilitarian and recreational trips (e.g., how to read a bus schedule, execute a transfer, take rapid transit),and more on safe bicycling practices. In tenth grade, many students take driver's education. The driver's education curriculum could include focused instruction on how motorists should interact with pedestrians and bicyclists, how to predict their movements, pass safely and learn when different modes have the right-of-way. b. Adult Education and Encouragement: Continue to partner with the Health District, Police Department, SCOPE and other interested organizations to develop adult pedestrian and bicycle program(s) which could include a public awareness campaign focused on responsible road behavior. The campaign could be directed to pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists alike and make use of public service space from newspapers, television, radio, bus advertising, posters and flyers included in utility bills. In addition, promote community events such as Bike to Work Week,charity bike rides, costume rides, bike fairs and bicycle rodeos. Include bicycle safety checks and safety information. Incorporate "share the road" signs where appropriate on City streets and include "sharing the road" or other safety campaign information on the City's webpage. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 16 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan 11.4.4 Enforcement While laws that address bicyclists' behavior and safety are in place, they are sometimes not fully enforced. Effective enforcement leads to a safer environment for pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists alike. The following methods address enforcement of this Bike and Pedestrian Master Program: a. Law Enforcement: Work with the Spokane Valley Police Department to develop a policy to include the City's intent to enforce existing laws affecting pedestrian, bicyclist and motorist responsibilities, including parking in bike lanes but especially those relating to drunken driving, careless driving, speeding and failing to yield. b. School Crossings: Continue assisting school districts to develop their Safe Routes to School programs to ensure safe crossing activity at school sites. Engage SCOPE as an additional presence where needed. c. Facility Upkeep: Continue existing program of regular maintenance of street and sidewalk facilities. Ensure that asphalt pavement overlays are flush with the concrete gutter and that utility covers are flush with the pavement. 11.4.5 Implementation and Funding Various portions of this Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Program can be implemented with existing procedures (such as paint applied when a road is resurfaced, continuing existing requirements and coordination with other agencies). Other portions will require further study, possible neighborhood input and detailed engineering design. Table 11.4.1 summarizes potential steps involved with implementation: Table 11.4.1 BPMP Implementation Summary 1 Program or Possible Implementation Step(s) Lead Department Improvement Further studies to determine exact facility Community Development;Public Works improvements to be implemented Neighborhood input Community Development Bicycle and Pedestrian Network Improvements Engineering design work Public Works Funding source identification Community Development;Public Works Environmental review Community Development;Public Works Application of requirements with development Community Development;Project Developers Ancillary Facilities Coordination with other agencies Community Development Education and Program research and development Community Development;Parks Department Encouragement Programs Coordination with other agencies in developing Community Development programs Enforcement Programs Funding Source identification Community Development;Public Works As referenced in Table 11.4.1, funding would be required to implement many portions of the Bike and Pedestrian Master Program. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 17 of 18 City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Detailed descriptions of funding sources, including match requirements and application timing, are contained in Appendix 3. Review of several funding programs reveals that while each grant announcement details specific criteria for funding, certain common threads are present. When applying for funding consider the following criteria: a. Partnership Funding is limited. Therefore, grant sources encourage and support cooperative regional projects and planning efforts that integrate housing, transportation, environmental impact and economic development. Projects that pull together public and private entities and multiple stakeholders are favored. b. Risk Reduction Crash data quantifies dangerous stretches of pedestrian and bicycle commute routes. Increasing safety for pedestrians and bicyclists encourages the larger community to consider these alternative modes of transportation. Projects designed to address a clear and demonstrated safety hazard are therefore encouraged. c. Location Bike and pedestrian facilities that link residential areas with schools, recreation facilities, and shopping areas result in a large benefit to a community. Encouraging alternative transportation to daily activities reduces car commutes and pollution. Well located projects also consider and provide for multi-generational users. d. Broad Project Scope Developing and encouraging use of an overall bike and pedestrian system is an on-going process. Implementing a successful bike and pedestrian master program includes identification of facility improvements, provisions for education, encouragement and enforcement, and program follow-up that provides for evaluation and adjustments over time. 11.4.6 Monitoring and Modifications Monitoring the effectiveness of the overall BPMP can be accomplished as part of the annual Comprehensive Plan review and update. Modifications to the Bicycle Map,the Pedestrian Map,the project implementation tables and other programs described in this Chapter can be accomplished as needed to achieve established goals. The City's web page can be updated with notices of projects that are in the planning, design, build or maintenance phase. Education and enforcement activities can be highlighted on the web page. Adopted 10-25-2011 (Updated 07-24-2013) Chapter 11 —Bike and Pedestrian Master Program Page 18of18 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Citywide Safety Improvements —Valleyway/Argonne/Mullan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Admin report August 9, 2011; BACKGROUND: A concerned citizen requested safety enhancements at the Valleyway/Argonne/Mullan intersections as a result of a 2013 crash between a vehicle and her daughter crossing Argonne at Valleyway. The citizen mentioned her daughter was walking across Argonne when struck by the vehicle. The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Highways and Local Programs issued a call for projects under the City Safety Grant Program in 2011. This is a sub-category of the federally funded Highway Safety Improvement Program. The purpose of this program is to address fatal and serious collisions on city streets with a focus on intersection safety. Staff prepared preliminary ideas for projects and requested input from Council prior to preparing the application. (WSDOT issued a 2011 Call for Projects for allocation of Federal Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funds for safety projects. The federal funds could be used for preliminary engineering and design, purchasing of right-of-way, and construction of city safety improvement projects. Funds were available beginning in 2012. The City of Spokane Valley was fortunate to receive HSIP funding for these citywide safety improvements in 2012. Staff identified projects based on crash data and prepared and submitted applications for the HSIP program. One of the several projects included in the application was crosswalk improvements at the intersections of Valleyway/Argonne/Mullan. The improvements identified include upgraded pavement markings and the installation of pedestrian activated beacons. Staff has been working on the design of the safety projects since 2013 and is currently finalizing the design plans while coordinating with the WSDOT. The design of the pedestrian activated beacons has been ongoing this year, and will be complete this December (2014). Construction is anticipated to occur in the spring of 2015. OPTIONS: Information Only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information Only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Projects are currently funded. STAFF CONTACT: Sean Messner, Senior Traffic Engineer ATTACHMENTS: n/a City of Spokane Valley 4000 Valley Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 12/01/2014 08:32 Page 1 of 11 Community Development Spokane Monthly Report .0,00Vdlley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Pre-Application Meetings Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community Development scheduled a total of 9 Pre-Application Meetings in November 2014. 20 15 101111; di 11 III 11 111 10,11 1 II i 01 li IIVI II 1 I 11 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre-Application = Commercial Pre-App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 2 9 11 6 10 8 5 8 3 7 7 0 Land Use Pre-Application Meeting 3 2 4 4 3 3 1 3 2 2 2 0 Monthly Totals 5 11 15 10 13 11 6 11 5 9 9 0 Annual Total To-Date: 105 Printed 12/01/2014 08:32 Page 2 of 11 Community Development Spoane Monthly Report .00.0 Valley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Online Applications Received Community Development received a total of 110 Online Applications in November 2014. 200 I 100 il 7a , n 1 , Hk F, Alv, a R _ 1 L4 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec )♦ Trade Permit Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Demolition Permit - Approach Permit Sign Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Approach Permit 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 Demolition Permit 1 2 3 3 2 6 4 14 1 4 3 0 Reroof Permit 1 1 13 25 20 10 28 13 18 16 7 0 Right of Way Permit 2 1 1 15 32 35 58 38 55 71 35 0 Sign Permit 0 3 1 3 2 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 Trade Permit 13 24 40 61 73 77 60 71 74 81 65 0 Monthly Totals 17 31 58 107 129 131 150 137 151 175 110 0 Annual Total To-Date: 1,196 Printed 12/01/2014 08:32 Page 3 of 11 Community Development I$po�ane Monthly Report 4.000Vdlley, 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Construction Applications Received Community Development received a total of 282 Construction Applications in November 2014. 600 It 4111! A 1 400 rt.<zt, , 1 illi 11111 Ill 41 4.°11.- 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New L2 Commercial -TI Residential-New = Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 2 8 18 6 2 3 18 3 8 1 10 0 Commercial-TI 15 10 10 11 14 10 15 8 11 11 9 0 Residential-New 5 20 18 12 22 17 12 12 19 20 11 0 Commercial-Trade 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 8 2 9 13 6 13 9 13 13 8 6 0 Demolition *2 *6 *4 *9 *3 *8 *8 *15 *2 *6 *3 0 Sign 9 *11 *12 *17 *15 *9 8 10 *13 *14 6 0 Other Construction Permits *172 *201 *330 *429 *449 *376 *418 *324 *415 *438 *237 0 Monthly Totals 216 258 401 497 511 436 488 385 481 498 282 0 Annual Total To-Date: 4,453 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 12/01/2014 08:32 Page 4 of 11 Community Development Spoliane Monthly Report 4,0,0Vdlley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Land Use Applications Received Community Development received a total of 46 Land Use Applications in November 2014. 100 ilili ' ii Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ...:,.,.1 Boundary Line Adjustment ® Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting " Act(SEPA) i VII Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 1 1 6 8 1 4 4 1 3 5 3 0 Short Plat Preliminary 4 0 2 3 3 0 3 0 2 1 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 0 1 2 4 0 3 2 3 3 2 1 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 2 1 0 3 3 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 Administrative 1 3 4 5 1 1 0 0 6 0 1 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 53 51 56 61 39 42 49 48 51 48 41 0 Monthly Totals 61 57 72 85 47 52 61 56 67 58 46 0 Annual Total To-Date: 662 Printed 12/01/2014 08:32 Page 5 of 11 Community Development Spooane Monthly Report .0,000 l ley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Construction Permits Issued Community Development issued a total of 251 Construction Permits in November 2014. 4\ 600 400 eJ 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New it.,,,, Commercial -TI Residential-New = Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 1 0 9 26 23 2 5 3 11 5 8 0 Commercial-TI 18 11 4 12 12 9 15 18 10 5 11 0 Residential-New 5 4 36 8 20 18 11 12 17 27 10 0 Commercial-Trade 3 1 0 0 10 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 4 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 8 3 8 12 5 15 8 13 12 7 5 0 Demolition 2 4 2 9 2 7 6 16 2 5 3 0 Sign 7 11 10 16 12 9 9 9 13 10 8 0 Other Construction Permits 147 152 271 318 328 319 332 263 302 389 206 0 Monthly Totals 195 186 340 402 412 379 398 334 367 448 251 0 Annual Total To-Date: 3,712 Printed 12/01/2014 08:43 Page 6 of 11 Community Development Spoane Monthly Report .00.0 Valley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Land Use Applications Approved Community Development approved a total of 36 Land Use Applications in November 2014. 100 iok 50 AO IF II II 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec v:r-i Boundary Line Adjustment MI Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting " Act(SEPA) flit!! Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 5 0 2 6 3 1 2 3 2 2 1 0 Short Plat Preliminary 0 2 3 0 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 1 2 2 1 0 2 2 0 1 2 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 Administrative 1 2 4 5 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 44 53 57 53 44 41 47 44 54 47 34 0 Monthly Totals 52 59 71 67 52 50 52 48 62 52 36 0 Annual Total To-Date: 601 Printed 12/01/2014 08:43 Page 7 of 11 Community Development poane Monthly Report .00.0 Valley' 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Development Inspections Performed Community Development performed a total of 973 Development Inspections in November 2014. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec —0►- 2012 2013 2014 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2014 601 633 995 1,278 1,320 1,294 1,412 1,223 1,301 1,474 973 0 2013 465 503 807 1,026 1,060 1,015 1,084 1,078 1,186 1,016 833 672 2012 644 623 541 828 1,104 926 985 988 931 1,149 805 551 Printed 12/01/2014 08:43 Page 8 of 11 Community Development Spoane Monthly Report l ley, 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 22 citizen requests in the month of November. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. r— 60__, 40 1 , 411x. Cil a Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non-Violation Environmental General Nuisance ® Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint,Non-Violation 0 1 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General 3 0 1 1 1 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 Nuisance 14 5 12 22 22 24 20 20 33 21 14 0 Property 6 3 13 8 9 13 11 14 20 6 8 0 Monthly Totals 25 9 26 32 32 46 32 34 54 27 22 0 Annual Total To-Date: 339 Printed 12/01/2014 08:45 Page 9 of 11 Community Development Spoane Monthly Report 4.00 l ley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Revenue Community Development Revenue totaled $84,442 in November 2014. 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2014 2013 - Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2014 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $0 $1,567,357 Trend $77,877 $68,528 $112,700 $142,013 $215,223 $195,948 $140,018 $116,427 $124,983 $103,820 $95,140 $70,239 $1,462,916 2013 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 2012 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $1,552,558 2011 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 1,083,255 2010 $87,229 $84,626 $109,029 $96,800 $305,185 $102,781 $87,805 $87,724 $107,002 $73,100 $72,948 $64,009 ef278,238 2009 $65,199 $68,914 $93,424 $214,601 $233,397 $136,568 $123,348 $204,739 $107,930 $121,658 $100,247 $110,001 F580,026 Printed 12/01/2014 08:45 Page 10 of 11 Community Development Spokane Monthly Report 40,000 Valley 01/01/2014 - 11/30/2014 Building Permit Valuation Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $3,592,571 in November 2014. t 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -•-- 2014 2013 - Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2014 $3.17M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $11.99M $7.70M $3.59M $0.00MU105.58M Trend $7.33M $4.17M $4.69M $8.52M $19.74M $19.01M $11.55M $9.67M $9.40M $7.55M $4.36M $2.21M p108.21M 2013 $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M 1$173.95M 2012 $0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M 1$110.22M 2011 $1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M $65.20M 2010 $7.06M $6.34M $6.82M $6.64M $32.55M $4.86M $5.36M $3.91M $5.71M $3.01M $1.93M $2.29M hr.48M1 2009 $1.91M $3.70M $2.74M $17.19M $17.03M $10.27M $7.75M $24.56M $5.18M $7.28M $4.87M $2.70M •M! R ,1. Printed 12/01/2014 08:45 Page 11 of 11 Spokane .00.0Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager Nlt(, From: Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager Date: December 24, 2014 Re Finance Department Activity Report -- November 2014 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of November 2014 and included herein is a 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of November. 2014 Audit of the 2013 financial Records and Annual Financial Report The process of preparing the 2013 Annual Financial Report began in May and was completed in early July. The State Auditor's Office began their annual audit of 2013 in June and completed the single audit and financial statement portions of the audit by the end of July, and the accountability portion of the audit by mid-September. On September 17 we had a preliminary exit conference with the State Auditor that covered the Financial Statement and Single Audit phases of the audit process and the final Exit Conference on the Accountability phase of the audit occurred on November 13. 2014 Budget Amendment As we have progressed through 2014 the need for a number of budget amendments arose largely as a result of a variety of capital projects. Council review of the amendment occurred at the following meetings: • October 14 Admin Report • October 28 Public Hearing • October 28 First reading on proposed Ordinance #14-014 amending the 2014 Budget • November 17 Second reading on proposed Ordinance #14-014 2015 Budget Development Process The 2015 Budget development process concluded on November 17th with Council adoption of Ordinance #14-015. The Council involvement calendar leading to adoption follows: • June 17 Council budget workshop • September 2 Admin report on 2015 revenues and expenditures • September 9 Public hearing #1 on 2015 revenues and expenditures • October 7 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2015 Budget • October 14 Public hearing #2 on 2015 Budget • October 28 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2015 Budget • November 17 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2015 Budget P.1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201442014 11.docx Page 1 Lodging Tax The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • September 3 — Courtesy letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers. • October 3 - Grant applications due at City Hall. • October 27 - Grant applicant presentations to lodging tax advisory committee. • November 17 - Admin report to Council on results of lodging tax advisory committee meeting. • December 16 - City Council motion consideration: Award lodging tax for 2015. Noteworthy here is that at their December 16 meeting, Council remanded the lodging tax applications to the Lodging Tax Advisory Committee for reconsideration based upon Council adopted goals and priorities. Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2014 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2014 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 17. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are reflected in our 2013 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2014 Budget as adopted. o November 2014 activity. o Cumulative 2014 activity through November 2014. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 89.23% of the amount budgeted with 91.7% of the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are collected. • Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2014 are $10,599,968 or 95.93% of the amount budgeted. We anticipate December remittances should bring total collections very close to the 2014 levy. • Sales tax collections represent only 10-months of collections thus far because taxes collected in November are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of December. Collections are currently $14,630,233 or 86.11% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes currently total $398,876 or 64.61% of the amount budgeted. Third quarter payments were due by October 31St and recorded as revenue primarily in November. P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports4Council Monthly Reports12014t2014 11.docx Page 2 • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter; however, the third quarter payment was received and recorded in November. So far in 2014 we have received $946,751 or 78,05% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter but some are only once per quarter. Through November we've received remittances totaling $1,366,993 or 72.46% of the amount budgeted. • Fines, forfeitures and penalties revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through November 2014 we've received remittances through the month of October with receipts of $1,265,293 or 86.03% of the amount budgeted. • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently $1,476,448 or 117.61% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in-season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $594,733 or 102.58% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at 84.55% of the amount budgeted with 91.7% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. Investments (page 18) Investments at November 30 total $49,159,009 and are composed of $44,094,400 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,064,609 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 19) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through November and total $16,522,926 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $945,078 (6.07%) greater than for the same 10-month period in 2013. Economic Indicators (pages 20 — 22) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 20) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 20 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2005. • Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $812,771 or 5.88%. • Noteworthy to 2014 collections is that they have surpassed 2007 collections, the single year in which the City received the greatest amount of sales taxes to date. In other words, it has taken seven years to catch up with prerecession sales tax income. P.IFinancelFinance Activity Reports1Council Monthly Repotts1201412014 11.docx Page 3 Page 21 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2005. • Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $34,519 or 7.81%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2013, exceeding the previous high in 2012 by $28,600. • 2014 collections are on pace to exceed those of 2013. Page 22 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2005. • Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $109,624 or 9.39%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and are slowly gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 23) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value and the 2013 assessed value for 2014 property taxes is $7,168,991,028. Following the August 2014 refunding of the 2003 LTGO Bonds, the City has $7,035,000 of nonvoted G.Q. bonds outstanding which represents 6.54% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.31% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $5,650,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $1,385,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 24 and 25) New to the report this month are charts that reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 24 provides a 10-year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2005. o Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have increased by $9,696 or .62% o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just over $2.0 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,846,000 to $1,868,000 in the years 2011 through 2013. • Page 25 provides a 6-year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed). o Compared with calendar year 2013, 2014 collections have decreased $91,109 or 4.26%. o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. o The 2015 Budget was adopted with a revenue estimate of $2,565,100. We will watch this closely as we progress through the coming months. P:IFinancelFinance Activity RepoltsiCounci!Monthly Reports1201412014 11.docx Page 4 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 11,049,400 4,197,769 10,599,968 (449,432) 95.93% Sales Tax 16,990,000 1,594,503 14,630,233 (2,359,767) 86.11% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,330,000 133,076 1,214,940 (115,060) 91.35% Sales Tax-Public Safety 745,000 74,451 677,753 (67,247) 90.97% Gambling Tax&Other Miscellaneous Taxes 617,400 41,055 398,876 (218,524) 64.61% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,213,000 264,701 946,751 (265,249) 78.05% State Shared Revenues 1,886,500 0 1,366,993 (519,507) 72.46% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,470,800 118,217 1,265,293 (205,507) 86.03% Community Development 1,255,400 76,773 1,476,448 221,048 117.61% Recreation Program Fees 579,800 37,041 594,733 14,933 102.58% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 85,500 11,603 82,884 (2,617) 96.94% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 117,600 2,202 87,381 (30,219) 74.30% Transfer-in -#101 (street admin) 39,700 3,308 36,994 (2,706) 93.18% Transfer-in -#105(him tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Transfer-in -#402(storm admin) 13,400 1,117 12,283 (1,117) 91.67% Total Recurring Revenues 37,423,500 6,555,814 33,391,532 (4,031,968) 89.23% Expenditures City Council 468,850 32,465 361,963 106,887 77.20% City Manager 660,843 50,588 579,083 81,760 87.63% Legal 470,922 38,447 409,608 61,314 86.98% Public Safety 23,384,643 1,865,308 20,136,629 3,248,014 86.11% Deputy City Manager 653,215 50,370 480,821 172,394 73.61% Finance 1,180,659 86,190 1,013,589 167,070 85.85% Human Resources 237,883 17,512 207,125 30,758 87.07% Public Works 882,694 60,748 643,267 239,427 72.88% Community Development-Administration 290,883 18,635 223,449 67,434 76.82% Community Development-Engineering 807,114 52,619 608,472 198,642 75.39% Community Development-Planning 928,906 66,588 789,903 139,003 85.04% Community Development-Building 1,267,656 91,625 1,072,563 195,093 84.61% Parks&Rec-Administration 274,743 19,836 235,132 39,611 85.58% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 796,200 72,017 667,974 128,226 83.90% Parks&Rec-Recreation 229,152 11,711 182,824 46,328 79.78% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 490,400 10,381 432,458 57,942 88.18% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 89,882 7,466 76,510 13,372 85.12% Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 828,842 56,205 692,734 136,108 83.58% Pavement Preservation 888,823 74,069 814,754 74,069 91.67% General Government 1,741,600 118,112 1,270,205 471,395 72.93% Transfers out-#502(Insurance premium) 325,000 27,083 297,917 27,083 91.67% Total Recurring Expenditures 36,898,910 2,827,975 31,196,980 5,701,930 84.55% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 524,590 3,727,839 2,194,552 1,669,962 Page 5 P:IFinance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports 12014/2014 11 30.xisx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91 7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget [#001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues SCRAPS Pass-Through 56,600 0 56,568 (32) 99.94% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 56,600 0 56,568 (32) 99.94% Expenditures Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 247,500 0 0 247,500 0.00% Community&Econ Dev(comp plan update) 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% SCRAPS Pass-Through 56,600 0 56,568 32 99.94% City Hall Remodel-Permit Cntr to Main Bldg 20,000 0 0 20,000 0.00% Law Enforcement Contingency 350,000 0 0 350,000 0.00% Public Works(autocad licenses) 8,800 0 8,800 0 100.00% Parks&Recreation(CP chairs) 11,350 0 11,192 158 98.61% Public Safety(precinct improvements) 24,000 7,679 10,739 13,261 44.74% Transfers out-#106(solid waste ed/marketing) 60,000 0 0 60,000 0.00% Transfers out-#312('12 fund bal>50%) 2,443,507 0 0 2,443,507 0.00% Police Capital-precinct workstations 14,500 0 0 14,500 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 3,266,257 7,679 87,298 3,178,959 2.67% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (3,209,657) (7,679) (30,730) 3,178,927 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (2,685,067) 3,720,161 2,163,822 4,848,889 Beginning unrestrictedfund balance 23,396,459 23,396,459 Ending unrestricted fund balance 20,711,392 25,560,281 Page 6 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget FECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,858,600 160,539 1,571,306 (287,294) 84.54% Investment Interest 3,000 110 1,738 (1,262) 57.94% Insurance Premiums&Recoveries 0 0 4,204 4,204 #DMO! Utility Tax 2,750,000 183,767 2,045,528 (704,472) 74.38% Miscellaneous Revenue 0 583 5,185 5,185 #DMO! Total Recurring Revenues 4,611,600 344,999 3,627,962 (983,638) 78.67% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 627,288 56,181 614,108 13,180 97.90% Supplies 386,500 47,077 416,781 (30,281) 107.83% Services&Charges 2,392,201 125,629 2,085,564 306,637 87.18% Intergovernmental Payments 798,000 1,735 442,677 355,323 55.47% Interfund Transfers-out-#001 39,700 3,308 36,392 3,308 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#501 (plow replace.) 75,000 6,250 68,750 6,250 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#501 (non-plow vehicle 10,777 898 9,879 898 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#311 (pavement preserve 282,000 23,500 258,500 23,500 91.67% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,611,466 264,580 3,932,650 678,816 85.28% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 134 80,419 (304,688) (304,822) NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 0 15,150 15,150 #DIV/0! Transfer-in -#302 0 0 23 23 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 0 25 25 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 15,198 15,198 #DIV/0! Expenditures 133 Sprague/Sullivan ITS 0 0 173 (173) #DIV/0! Capital 0 6,902 6,902 (6,902) #DIV/0! Patch Trailer 30,000 0 33,532 (3,532) 111.77% 204 Hawk Signal 25,000 0 15,670 9,330 62.68% Software 6,750 0 0 6,750 0.00% 214 City Fiber Connection 11,000 1,971 9,971 1,029 90.64% Transfers out-#303(Spregue/Thierman Int) 18,830 0 0 18,830 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new pickup) 15,000 0 0 15,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 106,580 8,873 66,249 40,331 62.16% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (106,580) (8,873) (51,051) 55,529 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (106,446) 71,546 (355,739) (249,293) Beginning fund balance 2,063,234 2,063,234 Ending fund balance 1,956,788 1,707,495 Page 7 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12014\2014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 7,800 0 0 (7,800) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 3 27 27 #DMO! Total revenues 7,800 3 27 (7,773) 0.35% Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV101 Transfers out-#309(Appleaway Trail) 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Total expenditures 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (42,200) 3 27 (57,773) Beginning fund balance 71,871 71,871 Ending fund balance 29,671 71,898 #105-HOTEL I MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 530,000 45,604 476,411 (53,589) 89.89% Investment Interest 300 23 247 (53) 82.30% Total revenues 530,300 45,627 476,658 (53,642) 89.88% Expenditures Interfund Transfers-#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Tourism Promotion 547,000 17,949 374,102 172,898 68.39% Total expenditures 577,000 17,949 374,102 202,898 64.84% Revenues over(under)expenditures (46,700) 27,678 102,556 (256,540) Beginning fund balance 236,927 236,927 Ending fund balance 190,227 339,483 #106-SOLID WASTE Revenues Charges for Goods and Services 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! Transfers in-#001 60,000 0 0 (60,000) 0.00% Total revenues 60,000 0 0 (60,000) 0.00% Expenditures Professional Services 60,000 15,684 25,693 34,307 42.82% Total expenditures 60,000 15,684 25,693 34,307 42.82% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (15,684) (25,693) (94,307) Beginning fund balance 236,927 236,927 Ending fund balance 236,927 211,234 Page 8 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #0IV/0l Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIVI01 Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIVID! Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 7,300 342 3,753 (3,547) 51.41% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 7,300 342 3,753 (3,547) 51.41% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,300 342 3,753 (3,547) Beginning fund balance 5,448,502 5,448,502 Ending fund balance 5,455,802 5,452,255 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 700 33 364 (336) 52.01% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIVl0! Subtotal revenues 700 33 364 (336) 52,01% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (499,300) 33 364 (500,336) Beginning fund balance 503,565 503,565 Ending fund balance 4,265 503,929 #123-CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,700 79 865 (835) 50.91% Interfund Transfer-#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 1,700 79 865 (835) 50.91% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 51,357 564,927 51,357 91.67% Total expenditures 616,284 51,357 564,927 51,357 91.67% Revenues over(under)expenditures (614,584) (51,278) (564,062) (52,192) Beginning fund balance 1,789,271 1,789,271 Ending fund balance 1,174,687 1,225,209 Page 9 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS _ #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 441,520 278,084 423,844 (17,676) 96.00% Interfund Transfer-in-#301 93,152 6,565 82,994 (10,158) 89.10% Interfund Transfer-in-#302 93,151 6,565 82,993 (10,158) 89.10% Proceeds from Bond Refunding 7,661,000 0 7,660,694 (306) 100.00% Total revenues 8,288,823 291,214 8,250,526 (38,297) 99.54% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 441,520 0 108,967 332,553 24.68% Debt Service Payments-Roads 186,303 0 17,626 168,677 9.46% Issuance Costs on Bond Refunding 112,000 0 107,341 Payments to Refunded Debt Escrow Agent 7,549,000 0 7,549,304 Total expenditures 8,288,823 0 7,783,238 501,230 93.90% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 291,214 467,288 (539,528) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 0 467,288 Page 10 P:IFinance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -REET 1 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 600,000 62,789 645,807 45,807 107.63% Investment Interest 1,000 58 633 (367) 63.29% Total revenues 601,000 62,847 646,440 45,440 107.56% Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#204 93,152 6,565 82,994 10,158 89.10% Interfund Transfer-out-#303 275,575 0 42,798 232,777 15.53% Interfund Transfer-out-#311 (pavement presen 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Total expenditures 553,199 6,565 310,265 242,934 56.09% Revenues over(under)expenditures 47,801 56,282 336,175 (197,494) Beginning fund balance 968,021 968,021 Ending fund balance 1,015,822 1,304,196 #302 REET 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 600,000 60,716 631,714 31,714 105.29% Investment Interest 1,000 66 726 (274) 72.63% Total revenues 601,000 60,782 632,440 31,440 105.23% Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#101 0 0 23 Interfund Transfer-out-#204 93,151 6,565 82,993 10,158 89.10% Interfund Transfer-out-#303 599,097 0 102,849 496,248 17.17% Interfund Transfer-out-#311 (pavement presen 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Total expenditures 876,720 6,565 370,337 506,406 42.24% Revenues over(under)expenditures (275,720) 54,217 262,102 (474,966) Beginning fund balance 1,323,378 1,323,378 Ending fund balance 1,047,658 1,585,480 Page 11 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued I #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 8,324,808 0 1,327,401 (6,997,407) 15.95% Developer Contribution 166,020 0 0 (166,020) 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 50 350 350 #DIV/0! Transfer-in-#101 18,830 0 0 (18,830) 0.00% Transfer-in-#301 275,575 0 42,798 (232,777) 15.53% Transfer-in-#302 599,097 0 102,849 (496,248) 17.17% Transfer-in-#312 Appleway Landscaping 250,000 0 14,450 (235,550) 5.78% Transfer-in-#312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 200,000 0 57,270 (142,730) 28.63% Transfer-in-#402 7,101 0 0 (7,101) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 2 17 17 #DIV/0! Total revenues 9,841,431 52 1,545,134 (8,296,297) 15.70% Expenditures 06D Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 860,280 2,919 172,033 688,247 20.00% 061 Pines(SR27) ITS Imporvement SRTC 06-26 10,000 0 67 9,933 0.67% 113 Indiana/Sullivan PCC Intersection 0 0 113 123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker 382,410 302 10,015 372,395 2.62% 141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC 123,090 7,777 47,036 76,054 38,21% 142 Broadway @ ArgonnelMullan 50,000 0 3,564 46,436 7.13% 145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail 100,000 369 1,924 98,076 1.92% 149 Sidewalk Infill 364,425 205,704 286,422 78,003 78.60% 154 Sidewalk&Transit Stop Accessibility 0 0 435 (435) #DIVf0! 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 4,000,000 17,441 336,636 3,663,364 8.42% 156 Mansfield Ave.Connection 1,158,727 3,135 665,435 493,292 57.43% 159 University Rd I 1-90 Overpass Study 50,000 0 24,411 25,589 48.82% 166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave. Int.Safety 538,850 1,956 31,496 507,354 5.84% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 341,928 3,234 4,781 337,147 1.40% 168 Wellesley Ave Sidewalk&Adams Rd Sidewalk 30,000 0 3,318 26,682 11.06% 169 Argonne/Mullan Safety Indiana-Broadway 0 0 558 (558) #DIV/0! 170 Argonne road: Empire Ave-Knox Ave. 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 175 Sullivan UP Tracks UC(SB)Resurfacing 0 0 0 0 #DIVl0! 176 Appleway Trail 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 100,000 27,413 90,759 9,241 90.76% 181 Citywide Traffic Sign Upgrade 50,000 428 96,561 (46,561) 193.12% 185 Appleway Landscaping-Phase 1 250,000 1,200 168,491 81,509 67.40% 191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 0 39,894 48,173 (48,173) #DJVIOI 196 8th Avenue-McKinnon to Fancher 300,000 215,603 259,821 40,179 86.61% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 91,891 0 149 91,742 0.16% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 0 0 191 (191) #DIVIO! 206 2015 CDBG Sidewalk Project 0 486 1,987 (1,987) #DIV/0! 210 Atcazar Driveway Reconstruction 7,000 71 933 6,067 13.33% 211 Trent Lighting Replacement 14,000 0 0 14,000 0.00% 213 Sprague/Thierman Intersection 18,830 0 0 18,830 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 9,841,431 527,933 2,255,313 7,586,232 22.92% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (527,882) (710,178) (15,882,529) Beginning fund balance 61,827 61,827 Ending fund balance 61,827 (648,351) Page 12 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91 7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget 'CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Interfund Transfer-in-#001 247,500 0 0 (247,500) 0.00% Interfund Transfer-in-#103 50,000 0 0 (50,000) 0.00% Interfund Transfer-in-#312 1,452,100 0 0 (1,452,100) 0.00% Investment Interest 500 32 355 (145) 71.02% Developer Contribution 0 7,300 7,300 7,300 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 500 0 50 (450) 10.00% Total revenues 1,750,600 7,332 7,705 (1,742,895) 0.44% Expenditures 203 Sand volleyball courts at Brown's Park 0 434 14,021 (14,021) #DIV/01 Edgecliff picnic shelter 9,000 5,186 5,186 3,814 57.62% 195 Discovery Playground equipment 51,400 0 51,280 120 99.77% Shade structure at Discovery Playground 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! City entry sign 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 209 Park signs 22,500 1,374 3,638 18,862 16.17% 176 ApplewayTrail 1,502,100 5,943 297,326 1,204,774 19.79% 208 Old Mission Trailhead Parking Improvements 55,000 0 235 54,765 0.43% 212 Edgecliff Park Restroom Sewer Project 13,000 0 2,345 10,655 18.04% Total expenditures 1,653,000 12,937 374,031 1,278,969 22.63% Revenues over(under)expenditures 97,600 (5,604) (366,326) (3,021,864) Beginning fund balance 352,779 352,779 Ending fund balance 450,379 (13,547) #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Miscellaneous 839,285 0 839,285 0 100.00% Investment Interest 1,900 87 953 (947) 50.17% Total revenues 841,185 87 840,238 (947) 99.89% Expenditures Capital 0 0 12,212 (12,212) #DIV/0! Professional Services 30,000 0 2,202 27,798 7.34% Total expenditures 30,000 0 14,413 15,587 48.04% Revenues over(under)expenditures 811,185 87 825,825 (16,533) Beginning fund balance 1,101,903 1,101,903 Ending fund balance 1,913,088 1,927,728 Note: The fund balance includes$839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site, If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City will repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285 10. Page 13 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91 7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -PAVEMENT PRESERVATION FUND Revenues Interfund Transfers in-#101 282,000 23,500 258,500 (23,500) 91.67% Interfund Transfers in-#123 616,284 51,357 564,927 (51,357) 91.67% Interfund Transfers in-#301 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in-#302 184,472 0 184,472 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in-#001 888,823 74,069 814,754 (74,069) 91.67% Grant Proceeds 2,886,736 0 1,889,131 (997,605) 65.44% Miscellaneous 0 0 50 50 #DIV10! Investment Interest 0 135 1,481 1,481 #DIV10! Total revenues 5,042,787 149,060 3,897,788 (1,144,999) 77.29% Expenditures 162 2012 Street Preservation 2,000 0 2,097 (97) 104.85% 163 Sprague Ave Swale Upgrade, Park to 1-90 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 174 2013 Street Preservation Phi 200 0 191 9 95.54% 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 1,520,583 1,200 1,157,098 363,485 76.10% 180 Carnahan, Indiana&Sprague Presery 330,000 34 287,797 42,203 87.21% 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 205,000 206 166,808 38,192 81.37% 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 1,374,683 8,869 999,263 375,420 72.69% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 33,920 6,710 15,865 18,055 46.77% 202 Appleway Street Preservation Project 400,000 22,398 289,933 110,067 72.48% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellsley&Wellsley 0 265 10,923 (10,923) #DIV/0! Pre-Project Geo Tech 50,000 6,803 55,293 (5,293) 110.59% Total expenditures 3,916,386 46,485 2,985,267 931,119 76.23% Revenues over(under)expenditures 1,126,401 102,575 912,520 (2,076,118) Beginning fund balance 798,609 798,609 Ending fund balance 1,925,010 1,711,129 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 2,443,507 0 0 (2,443,507) 0.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV10! Developer Contribution 0 0 4,675 4,675 #DIV/0! Total revenues 2,443,507 0 4,675 (2,438,832) 0.19% Expenditures Capital Outlays 0 0 0 0 #DIVf0! Transfers out-#303-Appleway Landscaping 450,000 0 0 450,000 0.00% Transfers out-#303-Sullivan Rd W Bridge 1,452,100 0 71,719 1,380,381 4.94% Total expenditures 1,902,100 0 71,719 1,830,381 3.77% Revenues over(under)expenditures 541,407 0 (67,044) (4,269,213) Beginning fund balance 7,742,299 7,742,299 Ending fund balance 8,283,706 7,675,255 Page 14 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,835,000 665,210 1,739,621 (95,379) 94.80% Investment Interest 2,500 98 1,073 (1,427) 42.90% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV10I Total Recurring Revenues 1,837,500 665,308 1,740,693 (96,807) 94.73% Expenditures Wages/Benefits I Payroll Taxes 505,535 33,665.16 314,600.07 190,935 62.23% Supplies 15,900 1,008 7,337 8,563 46.14% Services&Charges 1,065,076 66,311 894,324 170,752 83.97% Intergovernmental Payments 26,500 0 27,167 (667) 102.52% Interfund Transfers-out-#001 13,400 1,117 12,283 1,117 91.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#502 1,567 131 1,436 131 91.66% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,627,978 102,231 1,257,148 370,830 77.22% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 209,522 563,076 483,545 274,023 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 50,000 0 70,685 20,685 141.37% Interfund Transfers-in 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Developer Contributions 0 0 51,492 51,492 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 50,000 0 122,177 72,177 244.35% Expenditures Capital-various projects 900,000 173,984 173,984 726,016 19.33% Property acquisition 250,000 0 0 250,000 0.00% VMS Trailer 16,000 6,902 22,449 (6,449) 140.30% 150 Sullivan Bridge Drain Retrofit 0 0 1,152 (1,152) #DIV10! UIC Retrofits on Pvmnt Pres Projects 0 0 99,836 (99,836) #DIV/0! 168 Wellesley Ave Sidewalk&Adams Rd Sidewalk 0 0 117 (117) #DIV/0! 185 Appleway Landscaping 0 149 182,874 (182,874) #DIV10! 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 0 0 76,618 (76,618) #DIV10! 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 0 71,391 (71,391) #DMD! 193 Effectiveness Study 0 696 15,189 (15,189) #D1V10I 196 8th Ave-McKinnon to Fancher 0 16,550 17,513 (17,513) #DIVIO! 198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0 1,369 4,031 (4,031) #DIV/0! 199 Havana-Yale Diversion 0 112 8,743 (8,743) #DIV/0! 200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0 112 10,260 (10,260) #DIV/0! Transfers out-#403(Decant Prof-DOE) 50,125 0 0 50,125 0.00% Transfers out-#501 (new pickup) 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,246,125 199,875 684,157 561,968 54.90% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,196,125) (199,875) (561,980) 634,145 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (986,603) 363,201 (78,435) 908,168 Beginning working capital 2,319,423 2,319,423 Ending working capital 1,332,820 2,240,988 Page 15 P:IFinance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12014\2014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 259,106 (240,894) 51.82% Grant DOE-Decant Facility 634,523 0 629,904 (4,619) 99.27% Grant DOT-Decant Facility 100,000 0 100,000 0 100.00% Grant DOE-LID/Retrofit Design 120,000 0 0 (120,000) 0.00% Grant DOE-SE Yardley Retrofits 750,000 0 49,203 (700,797) 6.56% Grant DOE-Broadway SD Retrofit 40,000 0 0 (40,000) 0.00% Transfer-in-#402(Decant Prof-DOE) 50,125 0 0 (50,125) 0.00% Total revenues 2,194,648 0 1,038,213 (1,156,435) 47.31% Expenditures 163 Sprague swales 0 0 510 (510) #DMO? 190 14th Ave Custer to Carnahan 0 0 0 0 #DIVIO! 173 Decant Facility 910,159 47,209 883,448 26,711 97.07% 197 Broadway SD retrofit 100,000 227 227 99,773 0.23% Outfall Diversion(design only) 60,000 0 0 60,000 0.00% 192 SE Yardley Retrofits 1,000,000 258,583 724,831 275,169 72.48% Total expenditures 2,070,159 306,019 1,609,017 461,142 77.72% Revenues over(under)expenditures 124,489 (306,019) (570,803) (1,617,577) Beginning working capital 333,610 333,610 Ending working capital 458,099 (237,193) Page 16 P:IFinance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2014 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 91.7% For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30,2014 2014 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget November November 30 Remaining Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Transfer-in-#001 15,400 1,283 14,117 (1,283) 91.67% Transfer-in-#101 10,777 898 9,879 (898) 91.67% Transfer-in-#101 (plow replace.) 75,000 6,250 68,750 (6,250) 91.67% Transfer-in-#402 1,567 131 1,436 (131) 91.67% Investment Interest 1,000 58 633 (367) 63.31% Transfer-in-#101 (new pickup) 15,000 0 0 (15,000) 0.00% Transfer-in-#402(new pickup) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Total revenues 148,744 8,620 94,815 (53,929) 63.74% Expenditures Vehicle Acquisitions 90,000 0 102,782 (12,782) 114.20% Total expenditures 90,000 0 102,782 (12,782) 114.20% Revenues over(under)expenditures 58,744 8,620 (7,967) (41,147) Beginning working capital 1,183,348 1,183,348 Ending working capital 1,242,092 1,175,381 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 4 4 #DIVIO! Interfund Transfer-#001 325,000 27,083 297,917 (27,083) 91.67% Total revenues 325,000 27,084 297,920 (27,080) 91.67% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 355,000 0 272,435 82,565 76.74% Unemployment Claims 0 0 7,822 (7,822) #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 355,000 0 280,257 74,743 78.95% Revenues over(under)expenditures (30,000) 27,084 17,663 (101,822) Beginning working capital 124,171 124,171 Ending working capital 94,171 141,834 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 76,665,725 8,219,281 56,691,693 Per revenue status report 76,665,725 8,219,281 56,691,693 Difference 0 0 0 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 79,137,418 4,402,706 54,345,844 Per expenditure status report 79,137,418 4,402,706 54,345,844 0 0 0 Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 17,230,126 1,074,622 7,279,413 Page 17 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 12/11/2014 Investment Report For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2014 Total LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments Beginning $ 42,074,799.45 $ 3,064,608.90 $ 2,002,993.30 $ 47,142,401.65 Deposits 2,016,366.45 0.00 0.00 2,016,366.45 Withdrawls 0.00 0.00 (4,003.03) (4,003.03) Interest 3,234.65 0.00 1,009.73 4,244.38 Ending $ 44,094,400.55 $ 3,064,608.90 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 49,159,009.45 matures: 6/28/2015 11/4/2015 rate: 0.35% 0.50% Earnings Balance Current Period Year to date Budget 001 General Fund $ 31,764,355.67 $ 3,119.55 $ 34,641.71 $ 65,000.00 101 Street Fund 1,677,043.72 110.35 1,738.15 3,000.00 103 Trails & Paths 37,995.36 2.50 27.46 0.00 105 Hotel/Motel 349,066.18 22.97 246.89 300.00 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,193,467.20 341.73 3,753.15 7,300.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve 503,758.50 33.15 364.05 700.00 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 1,197,503.02 78.80 865.39 1,700.00 301 Capital Projects 882,774.57 58.09 632.91 1,000.00 302 Special Capital Projects 1,005,000.43 66.13 726.29 1,000.00 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 22,860.06 1.50 16.52 0.00 309 Parks Capital Project 491,392.97 32.33 355.12 500.00 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 1,319,080.68 86.80 953.27 1,900.00 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 2,049,434.62 134.85 1,481.05 0.00 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 402 Stormwater Management 1,484,112.45 97.65 1,072.53 2,500.00 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 876,060.86 57.64 633.10 1,000.00 502 Risk Management 5,103.16 0.34 3.69 0.00 $ 49,159,009.45 $ 4,244.38 $ 47,511.28 $ 85,900.00 *Local Government Investment Pool Page 18 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports1Council Monthly Reports1201412014 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 12/11/2014 Sales Tax Receipts For the Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2014 Month Difference Received 2013 2014 $ February 1,876,298.24 1,891,031.43 14,733.19 0.79% March 1,279,426.01 1,324,975.84 45,549.83 3.56% April 1,295,166.24 1,357,736.39 62,570.15 4.83% May 1,531,483.94 1,636,894.44 105,410.50 6.88% June 1,486,879.22 1,579,545.34 92,666.12 6.23% July 1,568,524.87 1,653,343.86 84,818.99 5.41% August 1,612,535.63 1,751,296.73 138,761.10 8.61% September 1,646,673.39 1,772,033.14 125,359.75 7.61% October 1,650,525.59 1,754,039.63 103,514.04 6.27% November 1,630,334.91 1,802,029.08 171,694.17 10.53% 15,577,848.04 16,522,925.88 945,077.84 6.07% December 1,544,088.55 January 1,584,524.73 18,706,461.32 16,522,925.88 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Crminial Justice 0.10% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 19 H:1Tax RevenuelSales Tax120141sales tax collections 2014.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 12/9/2014 Sales Tax Collections- October For the years 2005 through 2014 re ; 2014 to 2013 Difference 2005 ! 2006 I 2007 I 2008 I 2009 I 2010 j 2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 $ January 1,367,929 1,572,609 1,759,531 1,729,680 1,484,350 1,491,059 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887 6,618 0.40% February 917,747 1,068,743 1,155,947 1,129,765 1,098,575 963,749 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640 37,293 3.29% March 1,015,573 1,072,330 1,196,575 1,219,611 1,068,811 1,018,468 1,015,762 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991 53,505 4.66% April 1,322,070 1,371,030 1,479,603 1,423,459 1,134,552 1,184,137 1,284,180 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 89,705 6.60% May 1,159,647 1,392,111 1,353,013 1,243,259 1,098,054 1,102,523 1,187,737 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 80,507 6.10% June 1,212,663 1,362,737 1,428,868 1,386,908 1,151,772 1,123,907 1,248,218 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 72,756 5.23% July 1,377,753 1,555,124 1,579,586 1,519,846 1,309,401 1,260,873 1,332,834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 120,809 8.48% August 1,395,952 1,405,983 1,516,324 1,377,943 1,212,531 1,211,450 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 109,808 7.49% September 1,372,081 1,487,155 1,546,705 1,364,963 1,227,813 1,191,558 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 86,588 5.91% October 1,520,176 1,526,910 1,601,038 1,344,217 1,236,493 1,269,505 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 155,182 10.78% Collected to date 12,661,591 13,814,732 14,617,190 13,739,651 12,022,352 11,817,229 12,384,556 12,754,608 13,817,462 14,630,233 812,771 5.88% November 1,095,566 1,369,940 1,443,843 1,292,327 1,155,647 1,139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 0 December 1,286,191 1,366,281 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1,141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 0 Total Collections 15,043,348 16,550,953 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 14,630,233 Budget Estimate 12,280,000 16,002,000 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 Actual over(under)budg 2,763,348 548,953 (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 (2,359,767) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 122.50% 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% n/a %change in annual total collected 10.93% 10.02% 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% n/a %of budget collected through October 103.11% 86.33% 83.69% 80.27% 67.31% 82.01% 87.15% 89.76% 90.61% 86.11% %of actual total collected through October 84.17% 83.47% 83.83% 85.02% 84.38% 83.83% 83.40% 82.68% 83.30% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 16,000,000 14,000,000 - October -- September 12,000,000 August 10,000,000 - July 8,000,000 June 6,000,000 =May -April 4,000,000 `- March 2,000,000 _ =February 0 - Sanuary 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Page 20 H:ITax RevenuelLodging Tax120141105 hotel motel tax 2014.xlSx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA ' 12/9/2014 Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- October Actual for the years 2005 through 2014 2014 to 2013 Difference 2005 I 2006 1 2007 I 2008 1 2009 1 2010 I 2011 1 2012 1 2013 I 2014 $ % January 20,691.03 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,946.96 23,280.21 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 24,184.84 25,425.40 1,241 5.13% February 19,976.81 20,946.09 25,310.66 24,623.06 23,283.95 23,416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 25,974.98 26,013.62 39 0.15% March 22,828.15 24,308.48 29,190.35 27,509.99 25,272.02 24,232.35 24,611.28 25,654.64 27,738.65 29,383.93 1,645 5.93% April 29,748.41 34,371.82 37,950.53 40,406.02 36,253.63 39,463.49 38,230.49 52,130.37 40,979.25 48,245.81 7,267 17.73% May 29,017.66 32,522.06 31,371.01 36,828.53 32,588.80 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 40,560.41 41,122.66 562 1.39% June 35,330.35 34,256.71 36,267.07 46,659.88 40,414.59 39,935.36 41,403.41 43,970.70 47,850.15 52,617.63 4,767 9.96% July 43,841.82 49,744.62 56,281,99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818,60 56,157.26 61,514.48 5,357 9.54% August 46,852.10 45,916.16 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,229.23 63,816.45 70,383.93 6,567 10.29% September 46,746.18 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 70,794.09 76,099.59 5,306 7.49% October 34,966.85 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 43,835.57 45,604.07 1,769 4.03% Total Collections 329,999.36 351,520.13 393,860.31 405,216.51 362,792.00 387,437.90 387,740.11 420,270.72 441,891.65 476,411.12 34,519 7.81% November 26,089.36 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 42,542.13 0.00 December 31,740.18 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 34,238.37 0.00 Total Collections 387,828.90 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 518,672.15 476,411.12 Budget Estimate 436,827.00 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 490,000.00 490,000.00 Actual over(under)budg (48,998.10) 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 28,672.15 (13,588.88) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 88.78% 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% n/a %change in annual total collected 6.71% 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% n/a %of budget collected through October 75.54% 100.43% 98.47% 101.30% 70.86% 101.96% 80.78% 97.74% 90.18% 97.23% %of actual total collected through October 85.09% 84.28% 85.33% 86.75% 85.57% 86.38% 84.73% 85.77% 85.20% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 600,000.00 500,000.00 r October September 400,000.00 - n August ---- is July 300,000.00 "; ■June err- a May y 200,000.00 ■April 1 March 100,000.00 .. •February 1; •January 0.00 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Page 21 H:1Tax Revenue\REET120141301 and 302 REET for 2014.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 12/10/2014 1st and 2nd 114%REET Collections through October Actual for the years 2005 through 2014ns 2014 to 2013 Difference 2005 I 2006 I 2007 1 2008 I 2009 I 2010 1 2011 I 2012 1 2013 I 2014 $ January 147,819.56 243,894.16 228,896.76 145,963.47 55,281.25 59,887.08 64,128.13 46,358.75 56,898.40 61,191.55 4,293 7.55% February 128,082.35 172,154.72 129,919.79 159,503.34 45,180.53 64,121.61 36,443.36 56,114.56 155,226.07 67,048.50 (88,178) (56.81%) March 198,013.09 182,065.71 263,834.60 133,513.35 73,306.86 86,204,41 95,879,78 71,729.67 72,171.53 81,723.70 9,552 13.24% April 192,012.44 173,796.61 211,787.08 128,366.69 81,155.83 99,507.19 79,681.38 86,537.14 90,376.91 105,448.15 15,071 16.68% May 240,765.59 306,871.66 222,677.17 158,506.43 77,463.58 109,624.89 124,691.60 111,627.22 116,164.91 198,869.74 82,705 71.20% June 284,268.67 226,526.64 257,477.05 178,202.98 105,020.98 105,680.28 81,579,34 124,976.28 139,112.11 106,675.77 (32,436) (23.32%) July 209,350.53 2,104.30 323,945.47 217,942.98 122,530.36 84,834.48 79,629.06 101,048,69 128,921,02 208,199.38 79,278 61.49% August 280,881.50 451,700.06 208,039.87 133,905.93 115,829.68 72,630.27 129,472.44 106,517.19 117,149.90 172,536.46 55,387 47.28% September 214,738.94 188,066.23 165,287.21 131,240.36 93,862.17 75,812.10 68,019.83 63,516.73 174,070.25 152,322.59 (21,748) (12.49%) October 244,590.31 211,091.20 206,442.92 355,655.60 113,960.52 93,256.02 61,396.23 238,094.79 117,805.76 123,504.75 5,699 4.84% Collected to date 2,140,522.98 2,158,271.29 2,218,307.92 1,742,801.13 883,591.76 851,558.33 820,921.15 1,006,521.02 1,167,896.86 1,277,520.59 109,624 9.39% November 190,964.73 141,729.09 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 78,324.02 0.00 December 159,381.40 161,285.23 179,567.77 96,086.00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077.29 74,299.65 75,429.19 0.00 Total distributed by Spokane County 2,490,869.11 2,461,285,61 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185,706.66 1,321,650.07 1,277,520.59 Budget estimate 4,006,361.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,200,000.00 Actual over(under)budget (1,515.491.891 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 321,650.07 77,520.59 Total actual collections as a%of total budget 62.17% 123.06% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% n/a %change in annual total collected 23.92% (1.19%) 5.22% (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% n/a %of budget collected through October 53.43% 107.91% 110.92% 87.14% 44.18% 112.05% 102.62% 105.95% 116.79% 106.46% %of actual total collected through October 85.93% 87.69% 85.66% 87.72% 81.20% 88.49% 85.45% 84.89% 88.37%° n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 2,500,000.00 - ■October 2,00%000.00 -- September 0 August 1,500,000.00 -July a June 1,000,000.00 ■May F"I _:. _ ■April A M Q March 50%000.00 ■February i. Z. •January 0.00 2005 2006 2007 2003 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Frage 22 H:\Bonds\debt capacity.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 12/10/2014 Debt Capacity 2013 Assessed Value for 2014 Property Taxes 7,168,991,028 Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt Capacity 12/31/2013 Capacity Utilized Voted (UTGO) 1.00% of assessed value 71,689,910 0 71,689,910 0.00% Nonvoted (LTGO) 1.50% of assessed value 107,534,865 6,675,000 100,859,865 6.21% Voted park 2.50% of assessed value 179,224,776 0 179,224,776 0.00% Voted utility 2.50% of assessed value 179,224,776 0 179,224,776 0.00% 537,674,327 6,675,000 530,999,327 1.24% A 2014 LTGO Bonds Road & Period Street Ending CenterPlace Improvement. Total Bonds 12/1/2014 225,000 135,001 360,000 Repaid 225,000 135,001 360,000 12/1/2015 175,000 125,000 300,000 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 Bonds 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 Remaining 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 5,425,000 1,250,000 6,675,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 Page 23 H:1Tax Revenue\MVFT12014\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2014.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA12/11/2014 Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax Collections- October �' . • For the years 2005 through 2014 - �., 10 2014 to 2013 Difference 2005 1 2006 1 2007 2008 2009 2010 f 2011 1 2012 I 2013 2014 $ % January 147,527 157,910 172,711 165,698 133,304 161,298 154,792 159,607 146,145 152,906 6,761 4.63% February 127,972 145,663 162,079 149,799 155,832 145,869 146,353 135,208 145,998 148,118 2,120 1.45% March 130,443 144,867 156,194 159,316 146,264 140,486 141,849 144,297 135,695 131,247 (4,448) (3.28%) April 145,437 158,729 175,010 165,574 161,117 161,721 165,019 153,546 156,529 156,269 (260) (0.17%) May 137,178 152,049 173,475 162,281 156,109 158,119 154,700 144,670 151,595 156,850 5,255 3.47% June 150,717 166,506 183,410 176,085 173,954 168,146 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 (5,514) (3.29%) July 152,824 162,989 178,857 166,823 169,756 164,221 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 2,457 1.58% August 166,784 183,127 183,815 171,690 179,012 176,869 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 (1,675) (0.96%) September 180,271 187,645 191,884 176,912 175,965 175,067 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 (22,098) (11.31%) October 156,940 178,782 180,570 165,842 163,644 164,475 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 27,098 20.31% Collected to date 1,496,093 1,638,267 1,758,005 1,660,020 1,614,957 1,616,271 1,572,532 1,546,443 1,561,610 1,571,306 9,696 _ 0.62% November 159,824 177,726 181,764 193,360 167,340 168,477 160,461 162,324 164,303 0 December 147,454 159,974 159,750 142,230 144,376 143,257 124,714 138,223 142,140 0 Total Collections 1,803,371 1,975,967 2,099,519 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,571,306 Budget Estimate 3,526,056 1,753,000 2,000,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,897,800 1,861,100 1,858,600 Actual over(under)budg (1,722,685) 222,967 99,519 (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (50,810) 6,953 _ (287,294) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 51.14% 112.72% 104.98% 92.82% 93.98% 101.47% 99.08% 97.32% 100.37% n/a %change in annual total collected 7.14% 9.57% 6.25% (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% n/a %of budget collected through October 42.43% 93.46% 87.90% 77.21% 78.78% 85.07% 83.87% 81.49% 83.91% 84.54% %of actual total collected through October 82.96% 82.91% 83.73% 83.18% 83.82% 83.83% 84.65% 83.73% 83.60% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 2,000,000 1,800,000 ■October 1,600,000at September 1,400,000 - ___, ■August 1,200,000 _____:-.L. si July 1,000,000 ■June 500,000 ■May Mill 600,000 ■April 400,000 __ , ■March 200,000 iiiFebruary 0 , , , _ ■January 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Page 24 H:1Tax RevenuelTelephone Tax120141telephone utility tax collections 2014.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA O.Pf,..,` 12/11/2014 Telephone Utility Tax Collections- r.° For the years 2009 through 2014 Er.. r, 2014 to 2013 Difference 2009 f 2010 I 2011 2012 T 2013 I 2014 $ % January 128,354 234,622 241,357 193,818 217,478 210,777 (6,701) (3.08%) February 282,773 266,041 230,366 261,074 216,552 205,953 (10,599) (4.89%) March 230,721 264,175 245,539 234,113 223,884 208,206 (15,678) (7.00%) April 275,775 254,984 238,561 229,565 214,618 206,038 (8,580) (4.00%) May 242,115 255,056 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 80,740 62.46% June 239,334 251,880 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 (83,379) (28.39%) July 269,631 250,593 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 (7,427) (3.49%) August 260,408 246,261 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 (6,284) (2.97%) September 249,380 240,111 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 (11,409) (5.42%) October 252,388 238,500 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 (21,792) (10.60%) Collected to date 2,430,879 2,502,223 2,504,268 2,288,265 2,136,638 2,045,529 (91,109) (4.26%) November 254,819 247,848 240,246 225,319 212,947 0 December 368,775 236,065 236,449 221,883 213,097 0 Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,045,529 Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 Actual over(under)budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (704,471) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% n/a %change in annual total collected #REF! (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) n/a %of budget collected through October 97.24% 89.37% 83.48% 76,28% 73.68% 74.38% %of actual total collected through October 79.58% 83.79% 84.01% 83.65% 83.38% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of September 3,000,000 .7 October 2,500,000 September 2,000,000 August m July 1,500,000 - .. - --- aJune •May 1,000,000 - -- Mpd March 500,000 - ■February III0 ■January 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Page 25 Rick VanLeuven Ozzie Knezovich Chief of Police Sheriff 0 LI( `; Spokane Valley Police Department V :0; 'Services provided in partnership with the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, ellik Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: December 19, 2014 RE: Monthly Report November 2014 November 2014: November 2013: CAD incidents: 4509 CAD incidents: 4413 Reports taken: 1826 Reports taken: 1707 Traffic stops: 955 Traffic stops: 945 Traffic reports: 329 Traffic reports: 307 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing November residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the November Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For example, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake area to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. Page 1 ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief VanLeuven attended the bi-monthly meeting of Lutheran Community Services Northwest. New board member, Robert Palmquist spoke to the group about the Prison Rape Elimination Act and then a discussion was held about the new form of service delivery for the Advocacy & Prevention Team. Chief VanLeuven as well as other deputies from the Spokane Valley Police Department and the Spokane County Sheriff's Office participated in the Salvation Army's Shopping day at Target. Many children were able to shop with a deputy and take home some needed items they wouldn't have been able to afford on their own. Meetings connected to the Spokane Regional Law & Justice Council continued in November, which Chief VanLeuven attended. Quarterly leadership was held in November, which Chief VanLeuven attended along with lieutenants, sergeants, and detectives. One topic addressed was Spokane Valley Police Department's reaccreditation in 2015 and how this will involve everyone. Sgt. Mark Nygren, the Valley Precinct's Administrative Sergeant, led the instruction. The Citizen's Advisory Board met in November, which Chief VanLeuven attended. Mid-November brought the annual Crime Prevention Conference. Chief VanLeuven and Sheriff Knezovich joined the group mid-day to welcome everyone and thank them for attending the conference. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) Semi-Annual Conference was held during the third week of November in Chelan, Washington. The Accreditation Commission, on which Chief VanLeuven sits, also met during this conference. Chief VanLeuven and Lt. Szoke attended an annual breakfast and tour at Valley Hospital at the end of November. This is a great time for hospital administrators to meet with law enforcement and build relationships to enable the two agencies to work well together. Chief VanLeuven along with SVPD's Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) Deputy Todd Miller testified on behalf of Senator Padden on the current status of Marijuana DUI's and the effect the new marijuana law is having on an increase in DUI's in Spokane Valley. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): S.C.O.P.E. Participated In: • Veterans Appreciation Dinner at Valley Elks • Spokane Sheriff's Crime Prevention Conference • East Valley Community Coalition meeting • Crime Stoppers meeting • Goodwill GoodGuides Mentoring Program • Fall Free Spokane Coalition meeting • GSSAC Coalition meeting • Operation Family ID Page 2 November 2014 Volunteers Hours per Station Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 8 80.0 34.0 114.0 Edgecliff 29 684.0 80.0 764.0 Trentwood 5 143.0 77.5 220.5 University 13 189.0 439.5 628.5 TOTALS 55 1,096.0 631.0 1,727.0 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $37,337.74 for November 2014 Spokane Valley Graffiti Report 2012 2013 2014 Jan. 0 2 3 Feb. 0 7 16 March 2 13 11 April 14 9 30 May 16 4 4 June 15 9 13 July 41 7 12 Aug. 57 22 6 Sept. 26 4 12 Oct. 30 7 6 Nov. 19 7 2 Dec. 37 1 Total 257 92 90 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 56 on-scene hours (including travel time) in November, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 38 hours were for incidents in Spokane Valley. There were no Special Events hours in November. Total November volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 329; year-to-date total is 5,549 hours. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in October totaled 26 and in November 20 with 3 vehicles in October and 9 in November, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Seventeen hulks were processed in October and 6 hulks processed in November. During the month of November, a total of 68 vehicles were processed; the total for 2014 to date is 856. Page 3 SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS TRAINING HOURS SCSO SVPD TOTAL January 0 25 35 60 February 0 28 55 83 March 0 43 59 102 April 4.5 41 32 73 May 0 31 29 60 June 0 18 32 50 July 0 17 30 47 August 0 26 35 61 September 0 41 49 90 October 4.5 5 47 86 November 0 20 36 56 YTD - TOTAL 9 290 440 762 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT # of #of #Disabled #Warnings # of Non- Disabled City of Spokane Valley Vol. Hrs Infractions Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 4 40 4 0 0 February 6 78 25 0 0 March 3 57 11 0 0 April 3 52 2 0 0 May 2 52 9 0 0 June 1 18 9 0 0 July 2 62 5 0 0 August 1 18 1 0 0 September 3 30 1 0 0 October 4 20 0 0 0 November 4 22 0 0 0 YTD Total 33 449 67 0 0 # of #of #Disabled #Warnings # of Non- Disabled Spokane County Vol. Hrs Infractions Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 2 11 2 0 0 February 8 10 4 0 0 March 2 23.5 0 0 0 April 4 26.5 0 0 0 May 2 30.5 0 0 0 June 2 9 0 0 0 July 0 0 0 0 0 August 1 17 0 0 0 September 2 10.5 1 0 0 October 4 32 2 0 0 November 4 15 2 0 0 YTD Total 31 185 11 0 0 Page 4 OPERATIONS: Broadway Apartments Shooting — In early November, just after 9:30 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to a reported shooting at 11910 East Broadway in Spokane Valley. Two deceased adult male victims were located at the scene. The initial call into 911 stated a male had been shot and the location of the suspect was unknown. Several Spokane Valley and Spokane County Sheriff's Deputies responded to the location. When they arrived, they found the first victim lying on the ground outside the apartments. A search of the area was immediately conducted and deputies located the second victim inside an apartment. Emergency medical personnel arrived, but both victims were deceased at the scene. K9 Units began searching the area, assisted by Spokane County Sheriffs Office Air-1, but a suspect was not located. Major Crimes Detectives and Spokane County Forensic personnel were called to the scene. Detectives worked throughout the weekend on this investigation, but the initial information regarding a suspect was extremely limited. In early December, Spokane County Sheriffs Office Major Crimes Detectives served a warrant charging a 32-year-old male with two counts of Premeditated Murder 1St Degree and Unlawful Possession of a Firearm for the shooting. The bond amount of the warrant was set at $1 million. During the investigation, detectives developed probable cause to believe the suspect shot the victims, a 53-year-old male and 44-year-old male, with the premeditated intention to murder them. The male suspect, an eight-time convicted felon, was the nephew of the victims. The suspect was arrested on the day after the shooting for a Washington State Department of Corrections warrant and was later charged with Assault 2nd Degree stemming from an incident on July 5th, 2014 where he assaulted one of the victims with a knife. Wanted Suspect Tries to Elude Deputies and K9 — In early November, a 42-year-old male suspect was arrested for felony warrants and several new charges after a vehicle and foot pursuit. The incident began just before 9:00 p.m., when Deputy Jeff Thurman observed a 1990 Honda cross over the double yellow centerline as it travelled westbound on 4th Avenue in Spokane Valley. Believing the driver may be impaired, Deputy Thurman turned around and began to follow the vehicle. The vehicle changed lanes without using a turn signal and stopped briefly on the shoulder of the road at 4th and Fancher. The vehicle quickly accelerated and continued west on 4th with Deputy Thurman in pursuit with his lights and siren activated. As the suspect, the sole occupant of the vehicle, tried to escape, he continued to drive recklessly, failed to stay in his lane of travel, reached speeds of 50 to 60 mph in 35 mph zones and ran a stop sign at 4th and McKinnon. Deputy Thurman positioned his car to attempt a PIT maneuver to stop the vehicle, but the male swerved toward him in an attempt to block his efforts. Deputy Thurman's attempt to PIT the fleeing vehicle was successful, causing it to rotate and slide off the road and causing minor damage to a fence in the area of 4th and Koren. The male suspect jumped out of the passenger's side door as the vehicle was still moving and began running through a field. The vehicle, now unoccupied, continued across 4th and came to rest after striking a cement barrier. Deputy Thurman quickly exited his patrol car and yelled at the male that he was under arrest and if he did not stop, K9 Laslo would be deployed. The male suspect failed to follow commands and continued to run, so Deputy Thurman released K9 Laslo. K9 Laslo quickly caught the male and knocked him to the ground. The male kicked violently as he continued to resist and refused to comply with commands. He was eventually taken into custody after Deputy Justin Palmer and Corporal Damon Simmons arrived to assist. During a search, Deputy Palmer located a baggie containing a white crystalline substance and a baggie containing a brown tar-like substance in the male's coat pocket. Both substances were later field tested and showed a presumptive positive result for Methamphetamine and Heroin. The male suspect told Deputy Thurman he ran because Page 5 he knew he had warrants for his arrest. He said he was reaching between the seats of the vehicle during the pursuit because the vehicle didn't have brakes and he was pulling the emergency brake on the corners. The male suspect was booked into the Spokane County Jail on the felony warrants (Fail to Register as a Sex Offender and a Department of Corrections warrant) and new charges of Attempting to Elude, Possession of Methamphetamine, Possession of Heroin, Resisting Arrest, Obstructing and Driving While License Suspended. Shoplifting Suspect Arrested for ID Theft and Stolen Credit Cards — In early November, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Riley Quine arrested a 30-year-old female for theft, as well as additional charges of Identity Theft, Possession of Stolen Property (Credit Cards), Possession of Another's Identification and two warrants. At approximately 7:45 p.m., Deputy Quine contacted a Loss Prevention (LP) employee at Grocery Outlet located at 12115 E. Sprague Avenue in Spokane Valley. The LP employee stated he detained a female after he observed her conceal meat and spices in her purse and attempt to leave the store without paying for them. The female falsely identified herself as Morgan Morse with a Washington State driver's license. Deputy Quine arrested the female and advised her of her Constitutional Rights. She admitted stealing the items from the store and gave consent for Deputy Quine to search her purse. Deputy Quine located two wallets in her purse containing several cards, including three different identification cards and two credit cards with completely different names. During the investigation, Deputy Quine correctly identified the female and found she had two active warrants for her arrest. The female was booked into the Spokane County Jail for felony charges of Identity Theft and Possession of Stolen Property 2nd Degree as well as misdemeanor charges of Theft 3rd Possession of Another's Identification and her two warrants. Three Robberies within Hours on Saturday - Spokane Valley and Spokane County Sheriff's Deputies responded to three robberies within two hours on a Saturday in mid-November. The first robbery occurred at Walgreens Pharmacy located at 15810 E. Sprague in Spokane Valley at 4:41 p.m. The employee reported a male approached the pharmacy counter stating he was armed and wanted all the Oxycodone and Suboxone. A weapon was not seen by the employees and after receiving the medications, the suspect ran from the store. The suspect was described as a 20-25 year-old white male, 6'00", average build, wearing blue jeans, a black coat, gloves, a black knit hat and his face was partially covered. The second robbery occurred at 6:30 p.m., at Lucky Nails Salon located at 4808 E. Sprague in Spokane Valley. The employee told deputies a male entered the business yelling for employees to give him money. After taking the money from the cash register, the suspect ran from the store. The suspect was described as a white male, 5'06", wearing black clothing, gloves and a black ski mask covering his face. The employees did not see a weapon and no one was injured. A K9 Unit attempted to track the suspect, but was unsuccessful. The third robbery occurred at the pharmacy located inside Albertsons, located at 13606 E. 32nd Avenue in Spokane County, at approximately 6:50 p.m. Employees said the suspect jumped over the counter and started to grab bottles of Oxybutynin. The suspect appeared to be holding a knife as he demanded Oxycodone and Morphine. The suspect jumped back over the counter and ran from the business. The suspect was described as a white or Hispanic male, 5'10" to 6'00", approximately 160 pounds, wearing a dark colored coat, blue jeans, long dark curly hair, a beanie type cap, and his face was partially covered. A K9 track for the suspect was unsuccessful. Spokane County Major Crimes detectives are investigating the robberies and are unsure if they are related. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is now offering a cash reward for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this incident. Persons with information should call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line at 1-800-222-TIPS, or should submit the tip via the Internet website: http://www.crimestoppersinlandnorthwest.org Page 6 Tipsters do not have to give their name to collect the cash reward. A tipster's INITIAL call or web tip MUST be made to Crime Stoppers to be eligible for the reward. Tipsters working directly with police are not eligible for a reward through Crime Stoppers. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Northwest is a civilian organization that promotes public safety by paying cash rewards for information that solves crimes. It is not affiliated with law enforcement. Search Warrant Yields Drugs/Cash - Members of the Spokane Regional Drug Task Force (SRDTF) arrested a 46-year-old male in mid-November at an apartment complex in the 500 block of S. Sullivan for Delivery of a Controlled Substance, Oxycodone, and Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver, Oxycodone. The Spokane County Sheriff's Office SWAT Team assisted the SRDTF in safely securing the male's Spokane Valley residence at the Sullivan Court Apartment. The SWAT Team was used, in part, because of the male's lengthy criminal history, beginning in 1977, which includes arrests for Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver, Burglary, and Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Members of the SRDTF identified the male suspect, a resident of the Long Beach, California area, as a large scale oxycodone distributor in Spokane Valley. A lengthy investigation revealed that he had been delivering oxycodone in the Spokane area for the past several years. Investigators searched the male's Spokane Valley apartment and located $15,732 in U.S. currency as well as 511 - 30 mg oxycodone hydrochloride pills, which were strategically hidden inside the residence. The value of the oxycodone seized from the apartment has an approximate street value of $20,000. SRDTF Investigators continue to explore the male's possible ties to others involved with the distribution of controlled substances in the Spokane area. Update: September Shooting Incident Reported on Walnut - Spokane County Major Crimes detectives completed their investigation into a reported shooting that occurred in late September in the area of the 300 block of North Walnut in Spokane Valley. They concluded a shooting did not occur, but have requested a 27-year-old male suspect be charged with Assault 2nd Degree. The male is currently being held in the Spokane County Jail for a U.S. Marshal Hold on unrelated charges. This incident started in late September when Spokane Valley deputies responded to the 300 block of North Walnut for a report of a shooting with a victim. Responding deputies located a victim bleeding from his head and quickly setup a perimeter around the area. The victim stated he had been shot by an unknown suspect and deputies received several reports of a gunshot being heard, but could not locate a spent casing. Several additional patrol units, along with Spokane County Sheriff's Office SWAT Team, and Major Crimes Detectives were called to the scene. After two separate locations were cleared and several people at the scene were contacted, a suspect was not located in the area. Detectives developed information during the investigation and along with several tips from the public, identified the male as a suspect. After the male was arrested for a felony warrant, detectives interviewed him regarding this incident. Investigators believe the male hit the victim in the forehead with a replica pistol lighter and the impact caused the butane cell located in the lighter handle to explode, causing the loud pop reported as a gunshot. Suspects Charged for Robbery of Pizza Delivery Driver - Spokane County Major Crimes Detective Justin Elliott arrested a 24-year-old male for the robbery of a pizza delivery driver in Spokane Valley. A 16-year-old male and a 14-year-old female were booked into Juvenile Detention for assisting during the robbery. The incident began mid-November, at approximately 1:14 a.m., when a driver for Pizza Pipeline attempted to deliver a fictitious order to an apartment Page 7 in the 15700 block of East 4th Avenue in Spokane Valley. He contacted the apartment listed, but was told no one ordered pizza. As he walked back to his vehicle, a male ripped the delivery bag from his hand while a second male grabbed the driver from behind. The three males involved fled the area. The driver, who was not injured during the incident, immediately called 911 and several Spokane Valley Sheriff's deputies responded to the area. A perimeter was quickly established, but a search by a K9 Unit was unsuccessful. During the investigation, Detective Elliott learned the juvenile female placed the fake call for the pizzas with the intent to lure the driver to the scene. The 24-year-old male, the juvenile male and a 26-year-old male went to the location and waited for the delivery driver to arrive, and then stole the pizzas and breadsticks. The 24-year-old male was booked in the Spokane County Jail for felony Robbery 2nd Degree. A warrant for 2nd Degree Robbery was requested for the 26-year-old male's arrest. Vehicle/Pedestrian Collision in Spokane Valley - Spokane Valley Traffic Unit Investigators responded to a vehicle/pedestrian collision that occurred at the intersection of North Argonne Road and East Sprague Avenue in late November, in Spokane Valley. The 41-year-old pedestrian was transported to a local hospital for treatment and was listed in critical condition. At approximately 11:30 p.m. on a Sunday night, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to a reported vehicle/pedestrian collision at the intersection of Argonne Road and Sprague Avenue. The intersection was closed for several hours as Traffic Technicians began their investigation of the incident. Preliminary information indicates the pedestrian was walking southbound in the crosswalk on the west side of the intersection when the vehicle, travelling westbound on Sprague, struck the pedestrian. Initial reports state the 19-year-old driver had a green light, indicating the pedestrian, who was wearing dark clothing, was crossing against the red pedestrian light. At this time, there are no indications the driver was impaired, but speed does appear to be a contributing factor. This investigation of this incident continues. We would like to remind pedestrians and drivers to use caution while using or crossing our roadways. Drivers should be aware there are pedestrians out during all hours of the day and night. Pedestrians should be aware they are extremely hard to see at night and are encouraged to wear reflective clothing and carry flashlights to help with visibility. Major Crimes Tip Line (MCTL) Established- Spokane County Sheriff's Office Major Crimes Unit has established a "Tip Line" where citizens can provide information regarding Major Crimes investigations 24 hours a day/7 days a week. The messages left on the Tip Line will be received directly by the detectives working the cases, streamlining the flow of important information needed to solve major crimes committed in our community. SCAM Alert - The Spokane County Sheriff's Office received a report of a rental scam in mid- November, and we wanted prospective renters to be aware of it. The potential victim reported she was looking for a home to rent and observed a listing she liked on a website called "Trulia," and made contact to get more information. She was told the home was being rented because the owner could not find a buyer. Because the house was in a gated community, she could not see it until she filled out a rental application. She filled out the application and was informed she was approved, but she needed to send the "owner" $1,100 for the deposit along with the first and last month's rent. Once payment was received, she would receive the gate code and a key to the residence. Feeling something was wrong, she decided to drive by the residence and found the gate unlocked and noticed a "For Sale" sign in the yard. She made contact with the actual listing agency and found out the residence was in a senior living community and was for sale, not rent. Page 8 She received texts and emails asking her to send the money to a location in El Campos, Texas, but she did not reply. This is a reminder to be vigilant. Always verify people claiming to be employees of a company, any purchase or any financial transaction before you allow someone you don't know into your home or make any payment. These scams may have different stories, but one thing is always the same, they want to fraudulently take your money. More information regarding scams and consumer information can be found on the Federal Trade Commission Consumer Information website at http://www.consumer.ftc.gov. ******************* Page 9 2014 NOVEMBER CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Nov-14 Nov-13 2014 2013 2,013 2,012 2011 2010 2009 2008 BURGLARY 82 93 1043 989 1101 1062 1027 936 725 753 FORGERY 52 90 617 791 850 826 593 341 297 354 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 138 119 1464 1498 1628 1770 1566 1183 1245 893 NON-CRIMINAL 11 10 141 99 106 108 160 917 892 944 PROPERTY OTHER 114 111 1329 1353 1469 1236 1126 837 933 828 RECOVERED VEHICLES 39 36 433 506 541 446 416 365 187 319 STOLEN VEHICLES 55 51 531 564 602 586 566 496 298 496 THEFT 239 240 2822 2780 3040 2636 2512 2365 2162 1,846 VEHICLE OTHER 18 19 240 253 268 287 195 3 5 7 VEHICLE PROWLING 105 117 1081 1116 1206 1165 1491 1395 920 1069 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 853 886 9,701 9,949 10,811 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 7,513 ASSAULT 84 85 1005 876 950 936 963 895 927 869 DOA/SUICIDE 13 15 206 209 225 256 213 188 210 269 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 59 17 435 512 538 600 714 1297 1226 1063 HOMICIDE 1 0 3 2 2 2 3 1 3 3 KIDNAP 0 4 37 22 24 17 15 16 21 16 MENTAL 31 20 280 250 268 270 253 289 310 360 MP 16 10 125 144 156 154 125 128 115 95 PERSONS OTHER 249 224 3097 2897 3124 3112 2484 1692 1621 1,354 ROBBERY 11 4 87 93 96 79 98 68 75 71 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 10 11 122 133 148 212 162 153 159 95 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 474 390 4756 5138 5531 5638 4997 4727 4,667 4,195 ADULT RAPE 4 5 64 32 38 89 67 44 35 44 CHILD ABUSE 3 3 41 26 26 27 89 115 159 148 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 24 23 222 210 236 190 184 206 157 86 SEX REGISTRATION 0 1 0 4 4 8 2 1 2 3 INDECENT LIBERTIES 3 1 26 17 20 27 17 8 10 11 RAPE/CHILD 1 0 10 10 13 13 23 28 35 39 RUNAWAY 39 21 376 368 397 530 510 490 440 369 SEX OTHER 4 5 64 41 46 38 56 215 211 179 STALKING 4 0 19 21 21 24 19 18 15 21 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 64 42 563 406 440 424 341 215 175 142 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 146 101 1385 1165 1271 1370 1294 1387 1271 1,108 TOTAL ITF 24 23 308 287 316 430 521 542 671 838 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 329 307 2943 3225 3525 3957 3569 3081 3,183 3,811 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,826 1,707 19,571 19,764 21,454 21,723 19,996 18,589 17,460 17,465 E 2014 November INCIDENTS BY CITIES (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS 33 205 224 21 1 3 20 126 90 13 2,938 9 502 4,509 2 8,696 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 24 17 111 6 0 2 9 79 32 3 964 5 434 1,794 0 3,480 DRUG SELF INT (PATROL) 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 0 9 TRAFFIC STOPS 1 5 22 1 0 0 4 37 13 0 443 0 224 955 0 1,705 TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST/CIT/IN) 0 3 5 1 0 0 0 5 4 0 183 71 405 0 0 677 TS (WARRANTS) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 0 8 22 0 40 CALLS FOR SERVICE 9 188 113 15 1 1 11 47 58 10 1,974 4 68 2,715 2 5,216 ALARMS 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 3 3 0 125 0 1 117 0 259 ACCIDENTS 0 4 7 1 0 0 3 6 6 0 216 0 10 202 0 455 ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 16 0 20 DRUG CALLS 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 22 0 34 DV 11 1 8 1 0 0 2 5 2 0 116 0 7 181 0 334 DUI 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 72 0 3 65 0 145 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 27 0 30 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 4 7 16 0 0 0 1 10 15 0 363 0 26 555 1 998 VEHICLE RECOVERED 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 1 39 0 61 911 ABANDON LINE 0 83 8 5 0 1 1 5 3 1 142 0 14 243 0 506 SHOPLIFTING 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 51 0 54 ALL ARRESTS (ARREST/CIT/IN) 2 3 11 2 0 0 1 6 9 0 269 0 88 659 0 1,050 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 0 0 21 2 3 1 1 8 28 4 355 2 4 553 0 982 12/9/2014 2014 NOVEMBER CRIMES BY CITIES (Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriffs Office) AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV Total BURGLARY 3 0 5 1 0 0 5 0 6 0 78 0 0 82 0 180 FORGERY 0 0 4 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 37 0 0 52 0 97 MAL MISCHIEF 0 0 12 0 1 0 1 1 10 1 98 0 2 138 0 264 NON-CRIMINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 11 0 17 PROP OTHER 19 1 6 2 1 0 10 2 4 0 47 0 20 114 0 226 RCRVD VEH 3 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 22 0 5 39 0 73 STL VEH 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 27 0 7 55 0 97 THEFT 23 0 6 0 2 1 12 2 6 1 123 1 6 239 0 422 VEH OTHER 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 18 0 0 18 0 38 VEH PROWL 2 0 11 0 0 0 4 0 5 1 46 1 2 105 0 177 0ICIi KIN Il all LI DI NI WIN 1 Id I x.M 53 1 46 3 6 1 35 9 35 3 501 2 43 853 0 1,591 ASSAULT 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 1 0 45 0 3 84 0 145 DOA/SUICIDE 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 17 1 0 13 0 37 DV 10 1 2 0 0 0 2 3 1 0 30 0 2 59 0 110 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 MENTAL 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 17 0 0 31 0 56 MP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 0 0 16 0 22 PERS OTHER 15 0 11 0 0 0 14 9 6 0 156 0 35 249 0 495 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 11 0 13 I'LL-HARASS 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 13 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 35 1 18 0 0 0 24 15 11 0 274 1 40 474 0 893 ADULT RAPE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 9 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 0 6 CUST INTFER 0 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 13 0 0 24 0 42 SEXREGISF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 0 5 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 RUNAWAY 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 0 26 0 0 39 0 73 SEX OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 4 0 11 STALKING 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 6 SUSP PERSON 11 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 0 1 31 0 2 64 0 114 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 12 0 3 3 0 0 7 1 5 1 87 0 3 146 0 268 TOTAL ITF 2 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 4 0 9 24 0 43 TOTAL TRAFFIC 9 2 5 0 0 0 8 3 6 0 170 0 51 329 0 583 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 111 4 73 6 6 1 75 29 58 4 1,036 3 146 1,826 0 3,378 12/8/2014 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley 1800 1600 • 1400 1200 T 1 i i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 wwe ow, et"� �� • ��— -� - • cy 1000 � tet. Ai.. vr -2011 A --2012 -1-2013 800 Iv -6-2014 600 400 200 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls 4500 4000 3500 2 4, „,X • X 3000 Ai j- • • 2500 • • • • • • X2011 1 `-2012 • 2013 2000 -6-2014 1500 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS 140 120 -1 • 100 �� 4 .147'W �►/ 80 vr- X2011 VW •• ,2012 -0-2013 60 -A-2014 40 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Person Crimes 400 350 300 A 250 •� /�AVOW; � -�� • • • X2011 200 • --2012 • X2013 - 2014 150 100 50 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Property Crimes 1000 900 • 800 /��\ •_ 700 ��. 4411k eF ♦ 1 _i • • • 600 • X2011 500 • ——2012 —0-2013 • —6-2014 400 300 200 100 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents 3000 2500 • 2000 A,� • A NO iiWW A -o- 2011 1500 — 2012 X2013 -6-2014 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Sex Crimes 50 45 `� • 40 • 35 • /• • VA i r 4.. , w /' -0 2011 25 • A A • - 2012 L • — 2013 - 2014 20 I 15 • 10 5 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Ii1i= °o#41 ? l7 sa Cres �' R •F Fru t Hill Granite i'+�'� Mandala _ F + � 26 y .� r GroW -�� Sha''. �y.•- Fh, - Wabash .."4 ■ - o d e _ Ndi • Rub g' w '° lila ��II �l� -M ,�C..,.,r,��e �� Spokane '� 111511.a.---No. H Lacros- 8 P ti0, %TM arland . � �� vr, hill*• Mago ` /lle plimIli Kie an mug L 3- O 111'1 ©:+ `_1. 1 d 0 ecroft I��■fi'�y 1. x ice: Q y �;' • gm =magi=Mid.�• Oat• �7 ••w MA ndu'z�� •alton w : I. E lid � -rick - -•�, 11J11�111 •= ■ �' �_- 4411_ u n. ".I Park Eb , �. --/ \1.' __ira mou ♦ —=w op _ 6 9 Gra,• ZM_'_ 32 n •IMi MO ao-u;mEIVI//� • 2 M. "ett. m 1 M�w -- • vim,--��■. 1 i° °` ' Ids o Spokane alley Mont.. 4J :Ilialpa�Y�ll> GI mm i II 'N . 14 Mansfiel.> h /ES411 ,1, _ <41t �+ ...ii �YYCL`11yy ,•n en6 0 _ IlianiV '�- /iii 1 - Indiana _ ur l ■ Pit _ �.. i'�` rill� i � 1 F w�immilim ` � fir _ - Mission 1,mawI�W� oLi 11P'�I. . \ 0 m=1. �'t �� p.2 lei il .��1 i�l�� `h IIE11 ��AL�J1 �� dF� _ _■ '� -■��■■��. �■�■`■ _� (Il ldW Bi°l ibertyLalce Pli = Nam EllEentUrsErgOm'SMIEOWAilliffirthMulil 411 414W411441C41 0 'm ' Illalei9AgraWall reilligra grail PPP Rains ,e��-.— 7 1 111`` 7ii.,-.4,7 I IEN===l 1a `� = LI ._ ww' �■ � �� i7!!�f Af! .au 6th _ E�w1� �rmat� —rtia LLw ` - wAi h - 8th 3 yy IF�F.1�'-�� fc7 ='�1`F-Otero= . Will .4 //.m MIIREPINEI♦■�.:�■=1r •Jac _ Lu�Nuns — ` ' 14tth�' 44 sko I r fl i_ 1 1 ` w 18th ti. !■VFIIll1�■_II �ll� ,I�lh lOi • —�E r lw lay �� \ ■ \ 1 NERIN B229garail pm �..%.��11 P] 10. ,4`-'•• N. Oa. tar 21s 4+L13 �� LliIFY■ "' l � i'�ti •• , � Etea •�-1i\ nd T % CCrr--Fi ■ F3'ism ....1 �i amp --fe4m en ° '1Ef_—Eil -r iwcs3 M 11 ■1�ZEMEE We O C .owview nie IwCSL3—[.ti � Fwwb • KO !II 25thI likira ftb :�k •t5 / _—rt f�1ii1� - / . r, t r...rvar — �� Traffic M � I O ,��+y�i� SSI E�� I Collisions _amu—TIMIELITIMIN '�� 1,, ,. cA,„, 5,' . 0 -I asfre_ Ran•, lib ro Belle Terre i vo E_t-L;E•• , 3rth E A, 'h '�„ 8 •. Giti mina Odra Ball 4 W i Oy 3 O_ yr d O 11� ■ w II -; liiii n i rpt �' d Shelly W "e • A f = . 4• ■�;�[ _•uma m I ■�� .GLI�7 1'LLIlii 45th :J:-,- Low �•� 1 r .•E s- Cow, Fro` 11,511 I ��1� •°A.nnic E Medium Low .,� • C fez to �4,"{t�"�■. l/wa�V'er I nes `D N rA�L�' � �, .0 6 •e't �� _ Medium s '.� eso . p'n°�. SOV `? 54'Mi /1- { � °M°h oo "•-the -.5-1..v _ - High Isi!r 57th ( I` / 0'`•a/ ,,,f \ St 1 Sana" a�r.F k s4p 2 g 0 0.5 I Miles 2014 November Traffic Collision Hotspots Map Produced: 4.' I I I I" 05 Dec 2014 0 :�1�1• � 1 I :�'� Clements _ w ooa T /s M!.® .- F t ml7 a Cres MESA 4 �• i = 3 fro' MEER ,cif Magi 7 _ Mandalay E�� • i SR`s ''' Fruit Hill ' �� Granite wilt Col mbi..o C ly„ Wabash MITI8 III1IZiiek.•- 1.' ��-.. ■� po ane Rlch '� re-mal-Ongolausirc -ii•1�ra� .eLacross= �LLaci=1R1:17 kilt ,en arlandQ E 2 -9. kik .111.1% an ndunduMEGSE mem-,s, v 3. d Meg IIIIK ■rl—:2�"�1■�■5�Vii'"!� • O��a '•4. �� '- igi Inc ust��D - E lid == 1111211111911=2_ —r•ii Ll' —1— 4 .I Park E ,� • - r■rariaL / .915M1M-U1 111 a �/.-- rvie "� 6 Gra =�= 7.1.--11\ ji,'i MN iuu7 NNaril M. "ett. 1 P. �d��:' � grail! Buckeye <-- �.L-=®■`fly■'' `x.10 E yyam: �o<, . cT-'i/ 1111111:120• a 1 (�, ;� Spokan : alley _ = �",y11{ I LiaTmv.,.,river ice..-r ',Iiimili „e r 11 =No , ! �1s • G v - r" ^I QITlAa� '�=. r r°•i ■itli P '■� -Annum - �_ _ Bal RIS■- ""yyaa��` E�■■E. Lake • 0,--- _ saL�iC7[ow�1 r ��. rlfli"/ /ora Ph MOId yr illfiii,.�u�r A IMMO= `FM 11111"111IaLJI WE E :—M '24 1 - ✓/ EIME Wal - � -- --4111.11M1-1 ►.. L� ■ g` 'W—CII �--� `4 11E1101011411211011� �,{ �� r m v 1 I�IIIRI �' likl1111 -----'"et .��`r w =�/ --�•�•y,•�.�mort _ill FPF�IM 1,'� IAITAMt. a _A • `` v�'�Vista 1� CSl�i:r � o-F ■.■q7■��}■■© 1��11 ` Broadw�f ■ �_ • .�_-,1�.' III - %NeaO ■fl■iffill■'iii■n I I�1� 1..r—��6.NI .� C'' a��F �� . M Y,_ M i■■1 mi fir- �mi■im■mil Iw w �r,m 11 � _ -ALT-4_ _ — ,� --- SIV © WNW�i1 a NI ��in itoliam- e OEM�= 0 .....--"Mr -me......--t, p 7 gg, �z. � w �---N� ■� Fi!!1-�� ll�MelliM I I1- Fes — I V ` 5"II� • �y se =' •'�■■��Mn 1 ' �-�-_ Vilmirimira2=111111MINIIMeinanr&ImikE;sq............, W •au 6th __ C�_r� -i�.11—IELTIMII O' w' MElNo--.N�.� -!I —fitlln�_�..,> o•..l�l4 ~� °u IW :th 7,n ...... F, --„,---4A0.. li VI RINIMEMItt area= MIMI El ..., , Mil•F-� — e Ir ' ' _...L4Stam 1 . ..— mi .- m 1.1 Sir �_ � —lL7i— f- 1 Ei. — -^ rl�l. 1 4 a 1 l= 18th.. F�1■---1-- ,1`�ILI1� -1192,21 IE ' a lay ♦ � �^� ,\ � 11■■ • � star 21 st Roan�'• /� ,:,` mmai � `11 1117 .:Hi'B'JAIN NioltdiNS ;� i,e %. nd t =bit. • .-u= v 25th e=MEW= inn'e ,��ei�---' �� R �iil—� 1 O F n y EL I10 N'view ` `I. W a tea. '�tti arm l" O- n,�-- 9. 11—e-- I�ifi11 '� irleMWM �iri1171 A � ' _ -� i WM a , `IFAM9rr`. ..III' "U ■ _' +��I�w".�,� 3f� N 9 Commercial Lm —ma ,. Ran lix ' �° - - ,ah� c gepe Terre Burglaries i •r0A■ toE R m :AV °,,, Jnr '�lr 1.�.� ('� ko/ m�' ��yy7�� w ° �dr� �FJ� C• �\ rd =.� BalO 23 •'"�a• II I1.la15a hor.=p Kelly0.i1'_-]r+_ ■ �y n � � 45th _ o O 3 `511, l.l��• �c Ripme `r '9 _"- ,iceA7y` r� J A nn is E LOW _•. 5 �'� nes Corkery w `.� poi Fir , Y /le, D c 6& °es° t • Medium e • g" F s F 54m�� \k c orkery O pc "V4 o Mobahoo 4.'.. Y - High Mink 57th (��d¢e Reb` �k 1 _st l Sana �'F k - . �� I Y o K f 0 I 0.5 I IMiles 2014 November Commercial Burglary Hotspots 05De�2ce :1111111 Clements .n -0°1oa Trak Fel F7 1...sa Cres .mrIFIns! AL C Roti Mandalay ,21.11:....i.,,,.1,• R'o rF Frulir. Granite ` +�� sh �,,. Wabashl.l, d - _ _ a vT e � Q'cEMI Q - Rub ,.sertj' m Iles�1� � �`� �jFi Y •hO ane �,U.r\ve' ��33 Yitl :Iriple garland on yd 'T •tiiMan �- •�an• V{¢' eclM �W•'� �A' u x ppmr�� Jr�>t a _ ` fie.: Mr ...AMIE E .. `t O � / U 1p1 J E lid �� -rick p' 13['Ji/1��PFiril 40- 49�:'yhT.7_ :;� u .I Park E L ' r �7!��1�/ I,' � S :.U.,—to n 4 ;11rim'i:11:::21-71:::.::-' v9� , ,� ra- Z== M,. ! MEI.zo. ,err et cra M. 1 $� p .ertyLake '� 11.9 MI in.✓'" rel �m i � 1112P o'&5 ftpc', .1 y) ' vim•' mon.g.mery ac.i.:, r pokan : alley L .rrp� /moi [ _ li ■ �� o Gle ! �'� I� !�6 ..I y) •4 Mansfiel• a nb,. �dTIR� /![!�� I �� C � Knox p .. i ��7� ��$ � ■c1,�, I .a1:� 1:, _— — l 90 A tald Ib•. ° 0011 o ::: J:► — Nora Fjp a P r ` _ v �� C ` old ��. V _�1. _ � ''-� � �■1- �� ihild FAM! V�r1 \ Miss. Boone =��' all ■�Ir� .�:�. ,WP® -�', _h \ Des .� `N, •aLI� .irra %d iiiii l ilE to �— /Vista �, dh �I.l� Broadw An 11 ::tam ,. o} MUM ■ 11 E = 1 ��.=�1�� ■��11� : =., ` moi rii �.+.ta IP pp � � : 4h � � � V �� esse liM © fe an• 7 e .,CL ll Li; ..0d. 6th Mg '211171_ MEN1. ii==. Fa��L[L`_ li.. . rlll©' ! ��'ou t,NINIENWPMM V MUNI s a 1 :mot-MINN : :11 1 '`'� :=��1•F-4Jc 1.'°,4 %!♦" ...a. ' i� ..L4l..a ' iL l m��_l i_ sF .rtes` � w_, 18th ` F��I.e e;gy=m`�` apaph ri pme la, ..� r` , v. \= , r��7,1 i 11.. ! Oa tar 21st EllinaNI ft �=mama '7.iIlYEi��!' -! hew 1,..E7. hivo i .„ie a-MI= _! 4 ?ii,— =WEE= miSSSLLJ! ,,�rSL'il�ei: , yr �m�! v 25th �`I!'�eLil�� _��l� '� :� �� '-a� b °rbi� .�r rlimmmm EMI i_mr�s�n i-- nom a)M•EDLMIM `ta: hi te- �-0110 • piN � Terre 1r, cam=., .th :�1 `Nikrterio • 60 , , ge°e Q Residential yil - �r w E ri• :�a� �a a aPik 4� �� Ball 7 Burglaries 3 W n lt &limn ~ I .. ° r o d •hells o 1 e „ 45 4..4 15 I111.1.45111411r Tow � =LL45th q C 2 A.nnic A•/�t E ^ r ika ' pes Corkery w '�� fez .C e e e H Low �00,a� 5 0th D `��. o '0�6 re :,t��•• Y 517r°S 54 V.�� c R�e6 aAA o c s _ Medium 57th L�� °rkery C7 � 1.o rloha.y0o: gy - • Y V° J ge •obF� 4k Ste�'�' Sana 'F V,_a • cC 6' High o 0,5 I Miles 2014 November Residential Burglary Hotspots Map O5 Deo Prduced: p��' � Clements F •n, t D {per oM... R D o0 00 ► sa Cresr o in..-- ° �u S� ofl 2PA ■I•IA!!!!II! �' s F nGranite ��rar RMandalay b R� rFFru1111r) 2 V -111 11sh �• WabashLiaytl� OlY dqC�m Q .r��' .� aRub .serjm • �31 �-kW�p _ �° % ire II — . - •^, _ ! , �cX31®.1p.. .. po ane �.cNe' �Ili � ,�Q� Lacross- arland }�� .� Mii�fY®f1t® y •tI\�, ' � �� L 3ill a ar•• . i 111C� • • • uV�. IIII��©\a— ® Poe o - I��k f :��'• I0.4•_ a — P IilIJIIIIiil_�— � � u ` PilliAp -rick ��. i . I Park E b 9 '- �val�—! ■Figl'S�l/ mi �— '�E on 777! ftp. Spokanm:. : alley ,. �t;i�! gc .o< o � y'�� '��par" �1.1 I'� V ansfiel. � i ..1�A� ��---' Elm � �1 • �� .It X11 �. ! • ffir � a�.ya. ad=� i�AnL'._ ' �u '_�•�� Pt Old ^ir7 F Val I"MEl Millftrii.r..dir.. � a 1�■I-F � Fs...nu! g� V \\_►� Missi� �■��[��i]J—_ �IWIPPMM. • �'/ i .■II�Fk� �� IIIIII� w� I •� Des X141.- �oBoone ` lI E I 'III pi �' ,a l �6�.. , .r j I --��'�. h `\___.. . Catald° _�/ �. ■ IIIJIIil � -_ - ,IIIC: 1��.� s ' lika FIFJP/5 °} iii 11111irralliniliMli! 6 ) I` • r.��I FrontWWI li I rrin �• ��• itil �1 — AA AW Ills o_6-,4c)• 7■Ililll� �'�� " ''� � �,�r No— Shelley , 6th to k �� u■I7 Iia e �l�"=® ' U � ,�■��m -fli ii (tr<._�� i1� i . • �llll©y d,- •2.1 �� •lIGEMI* ,e •w�I/T�1 _ ah d a IL • ii. .ae SIMIIIIIII 13 5- of U i —tea Q `dA 'e9 • • .... _iIiIriiiii&_ . n �I �, dl�` . .ii l ,=�� 18th"g �• 'J-.�,-G 1 ��`� w '� . +'� iz� IaY EMMEN K�11�• \7 . �� ,�II.. I ., C. a tar 21st ` 777 --saa—•: � � �,� � ! ��p O� 10,46. M=_ =pr.. cn o ��,-� •I"aEmmusem _I:a i _ i..I rlfm 'S`� •°Whew mmimuumm vi 61,e 25th �IIl�---ill• %�Plirit rr.1 . �l an b mm INIESE• • �.•.° `ill, tv 1' : INN e ARE"s ,. I O rr•i '�IEtir ,J wafi: � Ran, r w ,� ,�� gepo Terre Stolen or Ear •th v p •, " Vehicles �` R�Illlw w 1rdndra ' ; o rN Ball • Rd�` I1 t ° MU.. �� ra� ir Shelly t°:um 45t — ©fie 57th Z�� °rkery C7C • Ao M°haH-ook6 ° .6� Elk, Ek c U sanb F High IIIIMlNEM Go. '''age e6 4.k Ste,. • b c 0 1 0.5 I 1 Miles 2014 October & November Stolen Vehicle Hotspots 05 DProduced: �` 'IliKM Clements _ -n s, °D Trak Fro. l...sa Cres4. fl ...-- Aiii F K 1 _ S hC RP,9f2armiI_ Mandalay b -- �• RF 6 yowl ,, ` arrGranite ,,,c' s d •• • 111 Sha'` `. .y� Wabash �� .�^l � reyd. 'm im Q d�' Rub Z - serj` •m • � -P sl'I� ��L�'�is;'r•- di t Q �1:�� . x ,� § �m a � mr:. CiLn N mtr EJ =po ane Urwe , . ♦t \�, Manng likr ¢' 111 • ooCI ,%Jiius1Ia igill °e V, m�.eiilk•Y u ,`• , WIIIME �_rick -' p' n112111111111111/ a UM Dm= u .- r E lid I Park E ^ 7� w-�/ 1ig�'r�--1 1161 1♦E. ,� /�,�� ' '� v 9 ■gra • --14. 6 -• - �■� .. Mitt -- ' ��F M. . dV p_ .ertyLake ri : io`� w.t 1/ 'dam ;'MM, - Spokan : alley ,%, Gienbn 4 Mansfiel• u ffa 111 - .•!' Mil ' ■/ i1, 111 _ L 0 PJ .r V�� :ald in [.49 ��% o Bal �� /�►NV Al ^ ■ ,��.i �� MINI. ■�:1: — �volds■_____ � MOO.■■ 'IE1!:••.. �■t om Missi. ■ ■ 1 -�1_ Ir,,a 4rJ w— ■ � �� J ��_ .. Des [-_ •• • i3l TM= a 1l11��71milio .- onroj1�. IS111R1 \- . Cataldc Broadway 11 l"� "®E 11C�7141uM1 . �■a 111:■1 �' ��- • Vista _ I�111111 yy;� y, '� BUhi ]![€ JJ o w itErn-,,e' All" ' �1 1ki — F'- .►.9A.._ � 1 � '� ��- d _EM 1:_a- ..e2�■_r _ !,_ —SEIM 10-141111M111111 R-7,77.wraliZIINUMMFIPP-' ,- ivA .1%e 11E-7-- -fa—.� r ti ..,l--_ � �� 8111 Mg �111 � 1�. �; 1 c.....�� ' .G1L11�+J�■L ,. a_" 6th ' MI IC• EtE• - �rc 13th�� •. �.� :- TAII-TEEL-011-111====illiiiram 74" . ... rill i,, 0 acro A..••.•.�y1IILi i��.-1 NMi`_t ` = 1 1 �Q, 18th —, 1l.-i1w.�li,�= ff! C0� 9'I �� j Tr �r _ • 1�� \ �.�9—Qq�!�i''�• \� 11��3 1� ••�'N�1 f ‘-‘. O�tar �1 end '��' �`. 11e ► 1`04' — i �iiin r —1.11167 1. .n O **& W -M.EIMI•J��-. �j) im1 Elko m ►`" k .9i •owview mmoki. i .,,,e 11•1=11.111 it, sa -SULLJMII=MIN= t 25th ` '-1—�_-- �� _\`s - :: geik a� a F lit T W�MMil a + Vehicle MCMC I Q ,moi, v .�1 Prowling .� Belle TerreI O -q [7�� 3'th �nit,�2CI 0 C 2 11 -11:p1:4:1134117:711. 11 w b ° ,o(sdra o , 'A Ball 3 d 3on. • l .. ilia'. _ it,..,, 71 d �hellY O 4 e n m` I .Ma�� 45th "�.- : o O rJ 45i)16 as.11 Vitee !'u a zFro v _MI / A., is c u_ �tE,y, Corkery N '', fez •C PP3 ° r y LOW 54 r s y�r '% a ° `s ■ Medium .i1 s7th L��i °rkery •C7 � o Mohair°oke'' $y _ (° to •e6 >'F' Ste ' Sana 'F V,_ ckcC p ■ High s%4�s 0 0,5 IIMiles2014 November Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Map 05 Dec S`�"oka.n ....OValley. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT November 2014 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Total %of Contract Name Contractor Expended as Contract Amount of 11/30/14 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $1,361,285.05 99.61% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $470,366.41 95.95% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $189,656.11 99.82% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $140,000.00 $45,731.14 32.67% Landscaping Ace Landscaping $82,902.72 $73,691.28 88.89% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $20,000.00 $11,705.94 58.53% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $55,465.92 92.44% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00 $199,973.82** 75.46% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $632,000.00 $493,334.51** 78.06% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00* $16,531.00 82.66% * Budget estimates ** Does not include October 2014 Citizen Requests for Public Works 70 60 0 50 w w 40 cc cu 30 N u 20 10 'IIIIIIIIIIIIII I Total 1 Citizen Dead Sign & Storm Requests: Snow/Ice Animal Roadway Pothole Traffic Signal Drainage/ Public Removal Removal Hazard Requests Requests Erosion Requests Works ■Submitted 66 5 24 8 3 16 2 8 ■In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •Resolved 66 5 24 8 3 16 2 8 `Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.qov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for November 2014: • Poe Asphalt Maintenance Contract — Poe completed small patches, repaired sinkholes at three locations, adjusted and repaved around various manholes. Stormwater work and sidewalk panels at various locations were also repaired and replaced. • AAA Sweeping vectored 174 catchbasins and cleaned the curb inlets along Sullivan, Indiana Mission, Marietta and Euclid. 19.15 tons of material was removed from those structures. • AAA Sweeping operated 45 hours performing monthly maintenance arterial sweeping. • The Geiger crew cut dryland grass areas for 17 work days and removed 4,820 lbs. of litter from our arterial roadways. • Our Dead Animal control officer removed 16 deer and 2 small rodents from the City's right of way. STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for November 2014: • 2014 Stormwater Utility Small Works Project, Package 2 was started and delayed until spring 2015 due to cold weather and asphalt plant shut-down. • Continued work on documents and specifications for new bid for street sweeping services. • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, and completed 5 Grant Applications for Ecology (see below). `Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS "pp Public Works Projects , 000 Val icy Monthly Summary-Design&Construction November-2014 Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open %Complete Construction Project # Design&Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA-BR 06/27/14 07/18/14 100 2 09/30/16 $15,833,333 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 02/06/15 02/27/15 90 0 07/15/15 $ 2,002,350 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 03/06/15 03/27/15 85 0 10/31/15 $ 722,795 0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project CDBG 02/06/15 02/27/15 5 0 06/30/15 $ 287,094 Street Preservation Projects 0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley&Wellesley COSV 03/06/15 03/27/15 95 0 07/30/15 $ 551,714 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade FHWA-CMAQ 11/07/14 12/05/14 100 0 08/31/15 $ 1,650,360 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 02/06/15 02/23/15 10 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 Other Projects 0149 Sidewalk Infill FHWA-CMAQ 08/08/14 08/29/14 100 90 06/30/15 $ 1,139,955 0176 Appleway Trail-Paving COSV 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 32 05/30/15 $ 1,400,000 $24,062,181 Design Bid Total Project Complete Open %Complete Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date Date PE Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15 10 $ 517,919 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 12/30/14 89 $ 175,260 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan FHWA-STP(U) 08/31/15 90 $ 276,301 0201 ITS Infill Project-Phase 1 FHWA-CMAQ 01/01/15 5 $ 327,562 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSV 06/01/15 2 $ 51,619 Street Preservation Projects 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/01/15 10 $ 1,156,500 0218 Montgomery Ave St Preservation COSV 06/30/15 0 $ 285,890 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 01/30/15 98 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15 90 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study Dept of Ecology 02/28/15 30 $ 300,000 0197 Broadway,Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit Dept of Ecology 01/31/15 30 $ 60,000 0198 Sprague,Park to University LID Dept of Ecology 01/31/15 20 $ 20,000 0199 Havana-Yale Diversion Dept of Ecology 01/31/15 33 $ 20,000 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion Dept of Ecology 01/31/15 36 $ 20,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) TBD 5 $ 402,300 $ 4,063,062 Information in bold indicates updates 3 CAPITAL PROGRAMS - GRANTS TIB Grant Announcement The Transportation Improvement Board announced on November 21 that 73 projects were selected for FY 2016 TIB funds of$95 million. Spokane Valley did not receive funding for any of their projects. TIB received 255 applications with requests for more than $294 million in funding. Department of Ecology Stormwater Grants Stormwater and Capital Programs submitted 5 grant applications on November 7 for Ecology's "Fiscal Year 2016 —Water Quality Financial Assistance" grant program: Project Description City Grant Total Match WSDOT Request Project 2015-2017 Outfall Elimination $167,500 X $502,500 $670,000 Drywell Retrofits with Pavement Preservation 2015- 2017 $227,500 X $682,500 $910,000 Sprague, University to Park Stormwater Improvements $500,000 X $1,500,000 $2,000,000 Spokane Valley Regional Decant Facility, Phase Ill $53,000 $100,000 $459,000 $612,000 Sweeping Program Effectiveness Study and Pilot Project $75,000 X $225,000 $300,000 Totals $1,023,000 $100,000 $3,369,000 $4,492,000 Grant applications statewide for stormwater grants totaled nearly $90 million and there are approximately $66 million available. Ecology will select projects and publish their results around February 13, 2015. Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) On November 10, 2014 Capital Programs submitted the "Seth Woodard Elementary Sidewalk Improvement" grant to Spokane County. The project totaled $435,720 which includes the $35,000 City match. The Housing and Community Development Advisory Committee will have project selection for public comment by March 5, 2015. TRAFFIC Sullivan Road Study The final TAC meeting occurred in October, with the distribution of a Draft Report to TAC members for review and comments. The Final Report incorporating comments received will be prepared in November. University Overpass Study Staff is continuing to coordinate with the consultant on the University Overpass study. Staff has provided comments on the Draft Report, which was distributed to TAC members for review and comment. The final TAC meeting will be held in early November. Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering. `Information in bold indicates updates 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: January 6, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street Sweeping Services Bid GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW chapter 39.04 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of the current street sweeping services agreement in 2007 and all subsequent annual renewals. BACKGROUND: The current Street Sweeping Services Contract expired at the end of 2014. This contract consists of sweeping public roadways throughout the City for purposes of mitigating air quality, stormwater, and traffic safety impacts from debris in the road. The contract is being competitively bid based on labor, equipment and material rates. Average rates and quantities for five years from 2010 through 2014 were used to establish estimated quantities for bidding. The contract shall commence in early 2015 and continue to December 31, 2015. The City may extend the contract for up to four additional one year terms, which will commence on January 1 of each year and end on December 31 of that year. The City will give the contractor written notice of its intent to extend the contract at least forty days before the contract term expires. The total duration of the contract shall not exceed five years. The bid was advertised on December 26, 2014 and January 2, 2015. The bid opening is scheduled for January 23, 2015. After evaluation of the bids received, staff anticipates bringing a contract for award to the Council for approval sometime in February. OPTIONS: NA RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The estimated cost for this work in 2015 is $489,087.52 and will be financed from Fund #101 Street Fund and Fund #402 Stormwater Management Fund. STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth — Public Works Director Art Jenkins — Stormwater Engineer ATTACHMENTS: