The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 01/08/2015 S1T%oIane 4.00ValleyH Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. January 8, 2015 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 11, 2014 VI. COMMISSION REPORTS VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: • Public Hearing — STV-2014-0001, Street Vacation for a portion of Old Mission Ave. at Mission Parkway. • Public Hearing - CTA-2014-0006, Subdivisions, Time extensions • Study Session - CPA-2015-0001, CPA-2015-0002, Comprehensive Plan Annual amendments, two privately initiated Comprehensive Plan amendments. X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall, December 11,2014 Chair Stoy called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Ms.Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson John Hohman,Community Development Director Christina Carlsen Cary Driskell,City Attorney Robert McCaslin Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Mike Phillips,Absent-Excused Karen Kendall,Planner Steven Neill Joe Stoy Sam Wood Deanna Horton, Secretary Hearing no objection, the Chair excused Commissioner Phillips. Commissioner Carlsen moved to approve the December 11, 2014 agenda as presented. Commissioner Stoy noted the public hearing on CTA-2014-0006 regarding time extensions on a preliminary plats would be held at the January 8,2015 meeting. Motion passed with a six to zero vote. Commissioner Carlsen moved to approve the November 13, 2014 minutes as presented. The vote on the minutes was six to zero, the motion passed. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Wood reported he attended the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber meeting, commenting the Chamber had reported a new sports complex will be built in the city of Spokane and that development could be occurring around the Mirabeau Park area. Commissioner McCaslin reported he had spent time with the Central Valley High School Key Club who were working on blankets for the Under the Bridge project. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Community Development Director John Hohman informed the Commissioners the City Council had finished the local adoption process for the Shoreline Master Program which will now be sent to the Dept. of Ecology for the final step. Mr. Hohman also acknowledged and thanked departing Commissioners Neill, McCaslin and Carlsen for their service. These Commissioners' terms are ending Dec. 31,2014. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Study Session — STV-2014-0001, vacation of a portion of Old Mission near Mission Parkway and the Old Mission Trailhead. Planner Karen Kendall explained the street vacation process. When the application is received requesting to vacate a portion of right-of-way, the City Council sets the public hearing before the Planning Commission. The application is routed for comments to staff, such as Public Works and engineering, and outside agencies. Staff prepares a recommendation taking into account connectivity, traffic volumes and future development. The Planning Commission holds the public hearing and makes a recommendation which is forwarded to the City Council. The City Council then makes the final decision regarding vacating the right-of-way. Ms.Kendall explained STV-2014-0001 was a request to vacate approximately 3700 square feet of the intersection of Mission Parkway and Old Mission Avenue. The property would be absorbed by the property owner to the north and would be used to enhance the trailhead entrance. Director Hohman 10-23-14 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2 explained the cooperation and contributions the developer has had with the City through this phase of the project and the previous phase and how he is improving the trailhead in this location. Commissioners had a few questions regarding the vacation, clarifying the City was not using it as right-of-way currently, that the property had not been appraised, how the developer would be using the property, and the vacation is not a request to expand the development to the north. Having no further questions, Ms. Kendall confirmed the public hearing for this proposal is scheduled for January 8,2015. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Ms. Horton reminded the Commission elections for Chair and Vice Chair would be held at the next meeting and the rules on who could hold those positons were in the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure. Mr. Neill, Mr. McCaslin and Ms. Carlsen all said farewell and thank you for the time spent in their positions and for the experience gained as Commissioners. Deputy City Attorney Lamb thanked the departing Commissioners for their service. He also discussed the recently adopted moratorium on medical marijuana businesses for the benefit of the returning Commissioners. Mr. Lamb mentioned how the review of any future regulations would be coming to the Planning Commission for consideration. At this time, the City is waiting to see how the State will regulate the medical side of the marijuana businesses during the upcoming legislative session. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business,the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Joe Stoy, Chairperson Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 10-23-14 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: January 8, 2015 Item: Check all that apply: nconsent n old business Fl new business Fl public hearing n information n admin. report n pending legislation FILE NUMBER: STV-2014-0001 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing–Street Vacation DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant J.R. Bonnett Engineers, on behalf of the owner River Sequel, LLC (Fritz Wolff), requests the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue, approximately 3,688 square feet in size. The portion of right- of-way proposed to be vacated is located at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway adjacent to Assessor's tax parcel number 45124.0138. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140; RCW 35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: A study session was conducted on December 11, 2014. BACKGROUND: The City received an application on November 12, 2014 requesting a street vacation of approximately 3,688 square feet on Old Mission Avenue. The adjacent property owner to the north (River Sequel, LLC) is making a request for the following reasons: 1. To enhance at the entry to the trailhead and development; 2. Provide delineation between public and private ownership; and 3. Offset land lost by the dedication of right-of-way for the trailhead turnaround and parking. I ry PROPOSED R/1r IC 3E PRJR.5ED R131'Ti} ^. . 2'6EHF(1 O MN CF ,r E%Allt,c `x MN;fiap4 7 -ExisiNG Eo-REIdEur. I PROkdS[h r u1. f Etl_711 SI]E%'NJI. / in. IliANN .446141W10".".—— ._ • E1 EC. r � ... � td~7t6E�LLTM �—.. L .. :..., 11.1 _,., ±- .... 1 f— Ilk\ ::____ w45124 0151 :. 7I�.✓ ... _ 1t t11 l� Pu�usISS M me! 4 }.. —�r� t �'. i.i:� 1 tia ,45124.0204 , ,, Area of proposed street " _ — vacation r d. / it 4 a ! • spoa aE N. EV Ii i 51�z,RPCA Public Hearing for STV-2014-0001 "` I Page 1 of 2 OPTIONS: Recommend approval of the proposed street vacation, recommend approval with changes, or recommend denial. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to recommend approval of the proposed street vacation to the City Council as proposed; STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report with Exhibits RPCA Public Hearing for STV-2014-0001 Page 2 of 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION ` " 01111"\Orak okane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 40,Valley FILE No: STV-2014-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: December 31, 2014 FILE NO: STV-2014-0001 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue approximately 3,688 square feet in size. STAFF PLANNER: Karen Kendall, Planner, Community Development Department PROPOSAL LOCATION: The area is located south of parcel 45124.0138, addressed as 16801 East Mission Parkway, intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway, further located in the SE quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington PROPERTY OWNER:Fritz Wolff, River Sequel, LLC; 220 West Main; Spokane, WA 99201 APPLICANT: Mark Grandwolh, J.R. Bonnett Engineers; 803 E 3rd Avenue; Spokane, WA 99202 APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. SVMC-Title 22 (Street Vacations) 2. SVMC - Title 21 (Environmental Controls) 3. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Aerial Map Exhibit 3: Application Material Exhibit 4: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 5: Agency Comments Exhibit 6: Public Comment I. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The area is 3,688 square feet located behind a newly constructed sidewalk connecting Mission Parkway with Centennial Trailhead. It is flat and consists of native plants and weeds until such time the weather permits for planting of grass. Comprehensive Plan Mixed Use Center(MUC) Designation: Zoning of Property: Mixed Use Center(MUC) Existing Land Use: Vacant. Multifamily development located northwest of the right- of-way is currently under construction. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 1 of 4 December 31,2014 II. STAFF ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE WITH SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE (SVMC)TITLE 22.140.030— STREET VACATIONS Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is raw land without pavement, curb or gutter. Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owner developing a multi-family development to the north a landscaped area for enhanced aesthetics at the entry to the Centennial Trailhead and apartment entrance. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public and does not impede access or circulation.. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public use or access and is not required for current or future public use or access. Should future development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? No. There is no need for a new and different public way. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of the subject right-of-way for public access. Should future development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. Staff received comments from Spokane Transit Authority (STA) stating there is no current service to the area. Further conversation with STA indicated that future development will likely warrant an STA bus route. At that time they will have the flexibility to work with the City and/or property owner to assess the best location for a bus stop along Mission and Indiana Parkway. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? Staff received 1 public comment for the proposed vacation from a neighboring property owner. Avista Utilities confirmed they have gas and electric utilities in the right-of- way and request preservation of utilities. Spokane County Utilities and Consolidated Irrigation District provided no objection as they have no facilities within the area proposed to be vacated. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 2 of 4 December 31,2014 Conclusions: The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. B. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21—ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff received 1 public comment from Bob Boyle of Hanson Industries on December 30, 2014 in favor of the proposed street vacation. Conclusion(s): A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on the property December 19, 2014 and notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley permit center and main reception area the same day. Public hearing notices were mailed to a 400' radius of the site on December 18, 2014 and notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on December 19, 2014 and December 26, 2014. Staff concludes that adequate public noticing was conducted for STV-2014-0001 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Comments were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff report: 1. City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department (Traffic Engineer) 2. Spokane Transit Authority 3. Avista Utilities 4. Spokane County Utilities 5. Consolidated Irrigation District V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV-2014-0001 as proposed is generally consistent, or will be made consistent, through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue approximately 3,688 square feet in size subject to the following: 1. The completion of the street vacation (File No. STV-2014-0001) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety (90) days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel 45124.0138. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 3 of 4 December 31,2014 3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be prepared and recorded with coordination between the property owner and utility purveyor. The easement with recording number shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation of easement submitted to City for verification. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction,repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community Development, or designee for review. 5. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of- way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards. 6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 4 of 4 December 31,2014 EXHIBIT I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' ' J 4Md4IO N D v wi I snig - Area of proposed . MB " street vacation i5125;J020 2 . i : I �. I . 11 - _ _ ..,....„. -45124.0204 _. d MEMr I .1 --- - - 1 :0416.1. 4,..„. . .mr-.7--7.---,--_ 1311111115P1151311. 41- " . - Is 1 - i .,f+ 52L d11 - lirr _ s 45191'1 17 i = ' .�l' __ . 551E > . ,_ cm crivival. lit- �_ .rp 4 -. '� ""- �_ 551 _- — 45121 D107 EXHIBIT 2 I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , ' ' ` ' %131440&40N ,_ .. - 1 • , .• IMimm r j .i ii . 1 e# ��!! s to 6 iv NM i we r MI ■� ��■ .. ! < k • ` I - *.s - v! �i i7 ■r!! r■ rl 1 — semi , , - 415.11="111111"111M1", , ___ 2 -- ......._Th -i-N.... '.1-4?-- ... , _.. . _ _ _ _ , ._ . ..._ . , . ....., .-t-: 1 _, . _ . _Ii - ,. , ,, ..„.... s° 1 las as Y._..$) -,..1.,--_,..,,,k 4141111 M1� { — —may - `. _ j _ + ~ CC - .- W .�- a -r• - < - b — M160- _ - �(" EXHIBIT 3 /'�`� STREET VACATION APPLICATION Scirc cx� /"'"" �:..�,,;z pokane SVMC 22.140 .0001F.Valley Community Development— Planning Division • 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5310 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0037 ♦ planning®spokanevalley.org STAFF USE ONLY C� Date Submitted: \\ 1 I 0 Received by: IL 2- Fee: i 7(f PLUS#: File #: C-.)—\! Dt 14-CCOi PART I — REQUIRED MATERIAL . RECEIVED '"`THE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT PROVIDED"' gi Completed Application Form NOV 2 2014 p' Application Fee CSV PERMIT CENTER 0 Notice of Application Packet(17.80.110)—Adjacent Property(ies)SUB # n REV. # aWritten Narrative — A written narrative describing the reasons for the prop sen err�et vacation, he physical limits of the proposed street vacation and the public benefit of the proposed street vacation. SZ Written Correspondence from Utility Purveyors 8Telephone Cable Electric Other(Specify) Water District Fire District Gas Utility 'Sewer Utility '� Vicinity Map—Submit a map showing the general area of the proposed vacation ra Record of Survey, if available, for the subject street and/or alley proposed for vacation, and abutting properties, streets and alleys within 100 feet on all sides of the proposed vacation. Uf Written Evidence of all easements, allowances or reservations, if available, pertaining to the street and/or alley proposed for vacation. PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION APPLICANT NAME: River Sequel, LLC-do Old Fritz Wolff • MAILING ADDRESS:West 220 Main CITY:SpokaneSTATE:WA Zip:99201 PHONE:480-784-7864 FAX: 1 CELL: EMAIL:oldfritz@awolff.com PROPERTY OWNER No.1:River Sequel, LLC MAILING ADDRESS:West 220 Main CITY:Spokane STATE:WA ZIP:99201 PHONE:480-784-7864 FAx: CELL: EMAIL:oldfritz@awolff.com PL-15 V1.0 Page 1 of 3 Spkkane STREET VACATION APPLICATION 4.000 Valley. PROPERTY OWNER NO.2:N/A MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: If more than two (2) abutting property owners, include information and written authorization on a separate sheet of paper for each. NAME OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: Indiana DIMENSIONS OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: Approx. 58'x 269' (Triangle) SQUARE FEET OF STREET/ALLEY TO BE VACATED: 6085 s.f. ABUTTING TAX PARCEL No(s).: 45124.0138 ADDRESSES OF ABUTTING PARCELS: 16801 E. Mission Parkway, Spokane Valley ZONING DESIGNATION: UR THE FOLLOWING IS CRITERIA EVALUATED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN FORMULATING A RECOMMENDATION TO THE CITY COUNCIL. ON A SEPARATE SHEET OF PAPER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS SHALL BE ANSWERED IN A DETAILED MANNER; 1. How DOES A CHANGE OF USE OR VACATION OF THE STREET/ALLEY IMPROVE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC? 2. IS THE STREET OR ALLEY NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC USE OR PUBLIC ACCESS? EXPLAIN. 3. WOULD SUBSTITUTION OF A NEW AND/OR DIFFERENT PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY BETTER SERVE THE PUBLIC? EXPLAIN. 4. HOW WILL USE OR NEED FOR THIS RIGHT-OF-WAY BE AFFECTED BY FUTURE CONDITIONS? EXPLAIN. 5. WILL EASEMENTS BE RETAINED FOR ALL UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES? THE REQUESTED VACATION IS LOCATED IN THE SERVICE AREA OF WHAT UTILITY COMPANIES.(SPECIFY)? 6. DOES THE RIGHT-OF-WAY INCLUDE STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES(SPECIFY)? PLEASE NOTE: PER RCW 35.79.040 (TITLE TO VACATED STREET/ALLEY), THE PROPERTY WITHIN A PUBLIC STREET OR ALLEY VACATED BY THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL BELONG TO THE ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNERS, ONE-HALF (1/2)TO EACH. THEREFORE, PROPERTY OWNER SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SIGN THE STREET VACATION APPLICATION. PER RESOLUTION 07-009 OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY COUNCIL HAS THE AUTHORITY TO IMPOSE CHARGES FOR STREET/ALLEY VACATION PURSUANT TO RCW 36.79.030 PL-15 V1.0 Page 2 of 3 Si` - STREET VACATION APPLICATION po ./0Valley% PART III — AUTHORIZATION (Signature of owner or authorized representative) I, ALVl S. t1-f5 . • , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and the best of my linowtedge. (Signature) t pate ft-A.11-4ml- NOTARY STATE OF ?LAC!toll it Ss: COUNTY OF$pes AN ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this _ day of IVOV'.4I1 L 20 := NOTARY SEAL e NOTARY SIGNATURE otary Publi n and for the State of IRFetshingtdn ,4-t-1 1.1,,..i. t�"We JARED BOWEN BLACK G.F,-;�'7 Notary Public-Arizona esiding at: S a� �: 4 ' . 'sem J Maricopa County 1 � ty COMM.Expists Septi,20 My appointment expires: 11 .+2 1 g • LEGAL OWNER NO. 1 AUTHORIZATION: If the applicant is not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; lE I, NTYA.4 . 3 iOER ..,_, owner of the above described property do hereby authorize 5• A. BJ'rrr fit;tw 1.►'1/41 b to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. LEGAL OWNER NO. 2 AUTHORIZATION: If theapplicantis not the legal owner(s), the owner must provide the following acknowledgement; I, 4l IU .k iLlEL' LJ--(... , owner of the above described property do hereby authorize J J.R • ga"wt 1 '" v"-4- to represent me and my interests in all matters regarding this application. PL-15 V1.0 Page 3 of 3 E. Old Mission Ave. Street Vacation —Part II Q&A 1. How does a change of use or vacation of the street/alley improve service to the public? The property to be vacated is excess land along East Mission Parkway. The street vacation will not change the public's use of the property. However, the public does get the trailhead improvements by virtue of land donated by agreement. 2. Is the street or alley no longer required for public use or public access? Explain. No. It is outside of the used right-of-way. 3. Would substitution of a new and/or different public right-of-way be affected by future conditions? Explain. No. The land is excess area. 4. How will use or need for this right-of-way be affected by future conditions? Explain. The property will not be needed in the future. 5. Will easements be retained for all underground and overhead utilities? The requested vacation is located in the service area of what utility companies? (Please specify companies). Yes, easements will be retained for all underground and overhead utilities. The utilities serving the property are Avista Corporation, Spokane County Utilities & Consolidated Irrigation District# 19. 6. Does the right-of-way include stormwater drainage facilities? No drainage facilities are located within the right-of-way. Project - - RECEIVED NOV 12 2014 CSV PERMIT CENTER SUB # L_ REV. # E. Old Mission Ave. Street Vacation Application Narrative This application proposes to vacate a portion of E. Old Mission Ave that has become unnecessary for public use since the road has been redirected via E. Mission Parkway and E Indiana Parkway. The area is a triangular shaped area approximately 3,688 square feet, located north of E Mission Parkway, east of E. Old Mission Avenue improvements and south of parcel 4124.0138. The remainder of the E. Old Mission Avenue is being improved by the applicant to provide better access to the existing Hiker/Biker trail for public use and to provide a clearer delineation between the surrounding improved private lands from the public recreational park area. The portion to be vacated will provide an additional delineation of public vs private lands and provide an additional tax base for the public. The area to be vacated contains several underground utilities that will remain and easements will be provided by the applicant to the purveyors. The City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department has agreed that the area in question serves no public use and that this process is the only way to restore the area back to the property owner. RECEIVED op No' 24 .oIL CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Mike Hawkins From: Red,Jim <JRed@spokanecounty.org> Sent: Tuesday,June 10, 2014 2:01 PM To: Mike Hawkins Cc: Stiltz, Mark; Depner, Colin Subject: RE: Riverhouse II Mike, The Division of Utilities has no concerns with this specific vacation Wil this vacation also be routed by the City of Spokane Valley? Jim From: Mike Hawkins [mailto:MHawkins@jrbonnett.com] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2014 2:27 PM To: Bob Ashcraft; Ken Carlson; Traci Harvey; Depner, Colin Subject: Riverhouse II Lady and Gentlemen, This project is requesting the vacation of a portion of Old Mission Ave. as shown on the attached map.Currently the only utilities in this area is Avistas' and County Sewer. Per Spokane Valleys application, it requires that I notify you and I get a correspondence back about the area to be vacated. If you have any addition questions, please don't hesitate to call or e-mail me. Thank you for your time, Michael Hawkins Project Design Engineer J.R. Bonnett Engineering 803 E. 3rd Ave. Spokane, Wa 99202 T: 509.534.3929 F: 509.534.4014 Email: mhawkins@irbonnett.com Protect #_ RECEIVED NOV 12 2QVt CSV PERMIT CENTER 1 SUB #E REV. # J Mike Hawkins From: Chambers, David <David.Chambers@avistacorp.com> Sent: Tuesday,June 10, 2014 8:31 AM To: Mike Hawkins Cc: Myhre, Randy Subject: Old Mission Road vacation Mike, According to the City of Spokane Valley, Martin Palaniuk,there has been no vacation application for this street. Typically,when the vacation application has been submitted and processed the jurisdiction (city of Spokane Valley) submits the documentation to the agencies for review. We reply to the city and they in turn compile all of the comments and send them to you. We would be happy to review the vacation when it is submitted. Thanks Dave Chambers Real Estate Representative affS TA Corp. work phone: 509.495.4419 rle cell phone: 509.981.4979 e-1--lclavid.chambers@avistacorp.com PO Box 3727 MSC-25 Spokane WA 99220-3727 Project # RECEIVED NOV 12 2014 CSV PERMIT CENTER SUB # REV. i Zr-Aot•.-;e 5-- . . / EOPIMIcivinfiyil Lorit.1%,,,,,t, ... . - — ... t2 / Afr-td/Y 7ti` Ofc.-ii 7te 71 ..,. • ...,..' '.- . ,• El= # 7\3E1 = # ens VICINITY MAP HEIN331.11/111i3d ASO 1710Z Z1 AON CI 3 A 13 0 3 8 • 44. pefoid a 1 � =z N Z-t cmn m 1. c m-11 om 0cn rn � G� 841 I0 = z®- 4-*Z - � *mZNC� W \\N >,,<m� DZ W ZF4,O Dm VS \trt p� D? 0 ''�'1J z N Z N89'57'44"W MISSION AVENUE \ c.4 759.39' \ F �,. S89'49'2,"E SECTION UNE _ N 1 NO'02'16"E 040.66' c�, r co f—31.83' V3 Cl S3 L2r N89'49'27"W 271.52' m iv VC z� X <� XI C Z� z-9 o13 n= wn)1- Z cin r'a w ro r trl m m Wx i '..°� cn P �o p� � ZCcn — f- taLQp D � wA %� Z �� ` zyvZ � cnro � r et l'a O w Drt /w N D< •.- •4. oD oD OD W ovO, i - N- H-:$1' wNczz ,,d D ddoo 'i S CS ° o mmt r as A N w u, a td � � � mii p, P1 r000roCr � � m � oocrl 9 9-I r vi �m O14cnZ r' ra V.� N Vow v W %0 -.I J Z = Y O CO v W —I en DURYEA&ASSOCIATES Land Surveying&Mapping 2702 North Perry Street Spokane,WA 99207 (509)465-8007 E-mail:mitchCduryea-associates.com October 31, 2014 Job No. 13-1768 EXHIBIT "A" OLD MISSION AVENUE RIGHT OF WAY VACATION DESCRIPTION A parcel of land situate in the Southeast quarter of Section 12,Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, State of Washington, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Section 12; thence North 89°57'44" West 759.39 feet along the south line of said Section 12;thence North 0°02' 16" East 31.83 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way line of Mission Avenue and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°49'27" West 271.52 feet along the said northerly right-of-way line of Mission Avenue;thence, leaving said northerly right-of-way line, South 00°00' 00" West 5.50 feet; thence South 89°49'27" East 3.47 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 52.00 feet; thence southeasterly 37.59 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 41°24' 48"to a point of reverse curve having a radius of 38.00 feet; thence southeasterly 27.47 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 41°24'48"; thence South 89°49'27" East 40.66 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 550.43 feet, the radius point of which bears South 18°32' 15" East; thence northeasterly 49.98 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 5°12' 07" to a point of compound curve having a radius of 481.28 feet;thence northeasterly 63.70 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 7°35' 02" to a point of compound curve having a radius of 617.11 feet; thence northeasterly 57.21 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 5°18' 43"; thence North 01°10' 33" East 0.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel embraces 3,688 square feet,more or less. Project RECEIVED NOV 12 2014 CSV PERMIT CENTER SUB # REV. 4 412411141 _ fi Ji 111111111111111.1 55073;`439 ` I N+l 4 AV A 0733.50 45125.9020 �}' ' ` - .r9�.24:11,71 557 1. 45124.01401Ma ' -- -� tOWulisi�r+ Av 11Aission P'k ..- __ c: .Mission Av 4i ' °51310714 ` i 0 hiliNAveil.l 111 P Q IEL I- 1 P: Ni' L •� 111 -- ,332 ,:11 } . 45131 1103 • - Y _ 45131.01 f�9 65 091. 13103 i5 _ - 9P i I. --__.,r - .. ` ,4 _. - F ply f I os w ,-- u+ -I 451311.0521 1.9 - '4:131.0502 kAr '~ .� "-4. } .56 STV-2014-0001 Vicinity Map (2014 Aerial) EXHIBIT 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Spokane Planning Division ,0.0 Valley NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING THE SPOKANE VALLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION IS SENDING THIS NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO ALL PETITIONERS (IF ANY)AND ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY ABUTTING THE STREET PROPOSED TO BE VACATED BASED ON THE MOST CURRENT RECORDS FROM THE SPOKANE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OR TREASURER'S OFFICE. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW: HEARING DATE: January 8,2015 at 6:00p.m. HEARING LOCATION: Spokane Valley City Council Chambers, City Hall, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101; Spokane Valley, WA 99206. REVIEW AUTHORITY: Spokane Valley Planning Commission STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall,Planner; 509.720.5026; kkendall(spokanevalley_.org. APPLICATION/DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: STV-2014-0001; Request to vacate an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue approximately 3,688 square feet in size. LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: The area is located south of parcel 45124.0138, addressed as 16801 East Mission Parkway, intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway, further located in the SE quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian,Spokane Valley, Washington OWNER: Fritz Wolff,River Sequel,LLC; 220 West Main; Spokane, WA 99201 APPLICANT: Mark Grandwolh,J.R. Bonnett Engineers; 803 E 3rd Avenue; Spokane, WA 99202 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: The Planning Division has reviewed the proposal/project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and Section 11.10.070.1 of the City of Spokane Valley Interim Environmental Ordinance from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). APPROVAL CRITERIA: Section 22.140 (Street Vacations) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC); Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code; the City of Spokane Valley Standards for Road and Sewer Construction Ordinance; the Guidelines for Stormwater Management; and the Spokane Regional Health District regulations. HEARING PROCESS: The Planning Commission holds the public hearing to receive comments and forwards a recommendation to the City Council for an ordinance adoption. STAFF REPORT AND INSPECTION OF FILE: A staff report will be available for inspection seven(7)calendar days before the hearing. The staff report and application file may be inspected at the Community Development Department Permit Center, located at the City of Spokane Valley City Hall, Suite B-3, 11703 East Sprague Avenue, between 8:00 am and 5:00 pm, Monday-Friday, excluding holidays. Copies of documents will be made available at a reasonable cost. Send written comments to the City of Spokane Valley Department of Community Development, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106; Spokane Valley, WA 99206; Attn: Karen Kendall, File No.STV-2014-0001 NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Page 1 of 1 STV-2014-0001 VICINITY MAP (2014 AERIAL PHOTO) 50Tx1 FF ' :tom m yCT•i?iS '� � �o-yy.. 'p� y F � a Ai i'1i ��ay�ryy�� — 4si?4.o2aille . ' w +ma:IVIIIIPIt, - '� 71, • CF rz 7121 ' ,fir '� -, • .6 . RS a. ° Sig 'z""° • y,d' ' a+. +•' �1Y41 [ r ' � ;1-1 w _ r — _ - A — Area of proposed JP !' street vacation , . t x • ' ,..4 V7 T�. 1 . 1 f. - &77.ri - 'a,• '-7 - . .,:-414.11 ' ..- , ' It. N110 . . - ...N.. I'L . .. I. r. ? rt'* .�r4 „' ,r '-.4# " ' 'hFe .may,+ '.ii. 4. 5 y -..±arc:' -' ai;`+e_ �e - -` 5 - CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY l 1 4 6— 141 Community Development Department Sr�i Qe Date of Mailing:Current Planning (Mailing of the required notice should occur before or on the Walley 11707 East Sprague Avenue,Suite 106 above referenced date. Failure to mail by this date may result Spokane Valley,00WA 99206 in extendingthepublic comment period.) Tel:(509)921-1000 P ) Fax:(509)921-1008 planninerEsookanevallev.org FILE NO: °-g—\) kiu\1t "M( AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING—NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) )ss. • City of Spokane Valley ) (PRINT '\gk NAME): Y--afen \ first sworn on oath) I being duly depose(s) and say(s): I am a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of eighteen years. 9. On the1 day of ,,,t" I. 61/ ,20 I rsonally deposited in the United States mail at N.)6 1 i Al a tl (POST OFFICE BRANCH NAME), with sufficient postage prepa d, a true and correct copy df the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,to the recordd real property owne and/or t payers, as show on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the I O day of o. v , 20\1\ , who have been found to own property within a four hundred(400)-foot periphery of the applicant's (and/or his/her agents) owned, controlled or under-option property. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses indicated on the attached list,incorporated herein by reference. In the event an address was not available in the official records,I used the current local telephone directory to attempt to locate a valid address. Notices to property owners and/or taxpayers adjacent(or directly across a street or road)to the proposal (including land owned or optioned)by the applicant and/or his/her agent) for REZONE REQUESTS ONLY were by CERTIFIED MAIL as indicated by the!ttached certi i.ed mail receipts. i Signature: �` \ Date: 2.'1 (J-1A- Signed A- ?lb Signed and sworn to before me this day of e_e?-411'10F _ ,20 d Li ------*),// % (y_li„ej --, 2-4440—J CU; D o� �d h►R s Z 0, ,j NOTARY UBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF WASHINGTON id i U YU��,' iO% Residing at e--' } . ? I�1k Y .My appointment expires:_ 7- • --'-' \‘ OF`U -..s.- - y 9Fc AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Dee ScITpoKane SVMC 17.80' <71 ?� Community Development— Planning D v Aq qti l .ofiValley � 11703E Sprague Ave Suite B-3 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 s-Vii< , 509.688.0197♦ Fax: 509.688.0037♦ planning@spokanevalley.orgApplicant to complete and sign before a Notary and return to the Permit Center at 11703 E. Sprague, Suite B-3,Spokane Valley,WA 99206. FILE NO. COP] at:n O co 1 ataelAIZOIVICAA0 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ) 6#2449 Inso Z- ,being first duly sworn, deposes and says: At all times mentioned herein I was, and now am, a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of eighteen years. On the I q day of Q ,, , 20 l , I personally posted a sign(s) as required in the City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Section 17.8, land use regulation at the following location(s) in the City of Spokane Valley: n/efie Signature of Applicant or Agent Date Signed and sworn to before me this day0 i� It of Dec,.- Notary Public State of Washington KATHRYN R. MARVIN MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NIT 'UBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF January,27,2018 ASHINGTON Residing at:*Vi li b My appointment expires: .SII Ie AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING Page 1 of 1 REVISED 01/27/09 EXHIBIT 5 Karen Kendall From: Deven Nickerson Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 3:09 PM To: Karen Kendall Cc: Eric Guth; Sean Messner; Ryan Kipp Subject: RE: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Attachments: Public Works Comment on STV-2014-0001.doc Karen, Here are the comments you were requesting! Let us know if you have any questions. Deven Nickerson City of Spokane Volley-Public Works 11707 E. Sprague Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Phone:509-720-5008 Fax:509-688-0251 From: Karen Kendall Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 9:00 AM To: Deven Nickerson Subject: FW: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Here you go! Karen Kendall, Manner- City of Spokane Valley Permit Center 11703 East Sprague Avenue,Suite B-3 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509.720.5026 direct 509.688.0037 fax www.spokaneval ley,orgfpermits From: Karen Kendall Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:45 PM To: Sean Messner; Harvey,Traci; crjohnston(dspokanecountv.org; Copley, Don; 'fired@spokanecounty.org'; consolidatedirrigation@corncast.net; 'Otterstrom, Karl'; 'Department of Arch and Historic Preservaiton'; Avista - South (David.Chambers@avistacorp.com); Karen Stoddard (karen.stoddard@centurylink.com); brvan richardson@cable.comcast.com Subject: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Good afternoon! 1 Please review attached proposal to vacate approximately 3,688 square feet of Old Mission Avenue at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway. Comments are requested by Monday, December 29, 2014. Thank you!! Karen Kendall, 'fanner City of Spokane Valley Permit Center 11703 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 13-3 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 509.720.5026 direct 509.688.0037 fax www,spokanevalley.org/permits 2 SOkSilf\i'ne 1[ ....Val ley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Karen Kendall, Planner From: Sean Messner, Senior Traffic Engineer CC: Eric Guth, Public Works Director Steve Worley,Senior Capital Projects Engineer Date: 12/29/2014 Re: STV-2014-00001 The application proposed to vacate approximately 3,688 square feet of Old Mission Avenue right-of-way at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway with parcel #45124.0138. An exhibit showing the proposed right-of-way vacation area, as included in the application packet, is below: CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS L.ENETH H 4124'412.0 • 30 37S] C2 424.41• 3BAD 27.07 (4\---./... C3 5.12.07' 99143 4491 18 gl 7 34 53993• 41128 57.70 n e C5 578'/3• 617.11 57,2: 1 I:4 " UNE TABLE ,f I LIME DEARIMC7 LENGTH LI 510.00'1%, 930 L2 51,41715E o'7.m..' �„ La J1 1•E eit r N T - RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION AREA N cv V o TAX PARCEL 46124.C13B z 10.36 ACRES* I. I ,' SCALE 1®.60' fro,, n 11 CF V] '1 t 1, POINT BEGINNING Cil P 1 12 7 11 EXHIBIT'B' to MISSIOW AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION DURYEA dl ASSOCIATES,P.S. 6L TME 5E 1/4 OF SECTION 72 -1172�.Pen sl.-.n SP WA 05t- Public Works comments on STL'-2019- 1 91P 23 NORTH•RANGE 44 EAST,WM. wl 46571, CITY 1x sPOCAME VALLEY, _,,._nom.,...-.,.....77 ,. 1 C::`llsers.14-endall4 ppnala°s.oc:alkl+licr semArff Cait+TY.NA3i4GTON „E,, r3 ,!�N `arks Comment on STV-2014- 0001.doc - - i The Public Works Department submits the following comments for the Public Hearing. These comments are based on the criteria for street vacation listed in Chapter 22.140.030 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public; The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or access; The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public use or access and is not required for current or future public use or access. Should future development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public; No. There is no need for a new and different public way. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of the subject right-of-way for public access. Should future development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public. Public Works is not aware of any objections at this time. Public Works comments on STV-2014-0001 2 C:\Users\kkendall\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\UCEV4XZT\Public Works Comment on STV-2014-0001.doc Karen Kendall From: Hynes, Mike <MHynes@spokanetransit.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 10:10 AM To: Karen Kendall Cc: Skillingstad, Don Subject: RE: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Karen Good morning. Don asked that I provide comment on the proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue. As you are aware,Spokane Transit does not currently service this area but may do so in the future.The vacation as proposed does not appear to pose any issue to future transit use provided it does not hinder the movement of pedestrians along the existing sidewalk network or cyclists along the paths and trails. Given that there is a trailhead and adjacent apartments, it's probable that Spokane Transit would seek to place a bus stop in the area in which case we would need to tie into the sidewalk network in order to comply with the ADA. Please let me know if you need anything further. Thank you. Mike Hynes Transit Planner Spokane Transit 509.325.6059 mhynes@spokanetransit.com SpohdneTidlls'It HC w.1 pr e3::Cy moVeS. From: Karen Kendall [mailto:kkendall@spokanevalley.org] Sent:Tuesday, December 16, 2014 3:45 PM To:Sean Messner; Harley,Traci;criohnston@spokanecounty.org;Copley,Don;'jred@spokanecounty.org'; consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net Otterstrom, Karl; 'Department of Arch and Historic Preservaiton'; Avista-South (David.Chambers avistacorp,com); Karen Stoddard (karen.stoddard�3a centurylink.cam); bryan richardson@cable_comcast.cam Subject: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Good afternoon! Please review attached proposal to vacate approximately 3,688 square feet of Old Mission Avenue at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway. Comments are requested by Monday, December 29, 2014. Thank you!! 1 Karen Kenclall, Planner City of Spokane Valley Permit Center 11703 East Sprague Avenue, Suite B-3 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509.720.5026 direct 509.688.0037 fax www.spokanevalley.org/permits 2 Karen Kendall From: Chambers, David <David.Chambers@avistacorp.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 8:34 AM To: Karen Kendall Subject: STV 2014-0001 Old Mission Ave Attachments: IMG 0448.JPG Karen, Avista currently has both electric and gas located in the proposed area to be vacated.There are pipes,valves,conduit, UG conductor, transformer, junction enclosure and a large vault all located on this little portion of property. In order to agree to the vacation Avista will need an easement granted over the entire area. If a vacation is granted,please send us a copy of the document/ordinance which grants the easement . Thank You. Dave Chambers Real Estate Representative #i//STA Corp. eir work phone: 509.495.4419 ie cell phone: 509.981.4979 e-1-ldavid.chambers@avistacorp.com PO Box 3727 MSC-25 Spokane WA 99220-3727 r } Proposed area to be vacated Old Mission — ,E3< AVISTA ELECTRIC INA 'f-7— • A et'.4144 i.c3 - ..a 1 Proposed area to be vacated Old Missiari 0 AV1STA GAS � - 2 Karen Kendall From: Red,Jim <JRed@spokanecounty.org> Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2014 9:59 AM To: Karen Kendall Subject: Project: 5TV-2014-0001 Attachments: r PA Comments.rtf 1 To: Karen Kendall (City of Spokane Valley-Community Development) CC: From: Jim Red (Spokane County - Division of Utilities) Date: Thursday, December 18, 2014 Planning/Building #: Subject STV-2014-0001 Stage: Preliminary Phase: Old Mission Address SS01 A This proposal has no impact on sewer facilities. There are no recommendations. Karen Kendall From: Consolidated Irr. District <consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2014 8:01 AM To: Karen Kendall Subject: RE: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Karen: Consolidated Irrigation does not object to the proposed vacation. We do not have any facilities within the vacated area and will not in the future. Thanks. Bob Ashcraft Mngr. From: Karen Kendall [mailto:kkendall@spokanevalley.orgl Sent:Tuesday, DecPmber 16, 2014 3:45 PM To: Sean Messner; Harvey,Traci; cdohnstonOspokanecounty.org; Copley, Don; 'jred@spokanecounty.org'; consolidatedirrigation@comcast.net; 'Otterstrom, Karl`; 'Department of Arch and Historic Preservaiton'; Avista - South (David.Chambers(aavistacorp.com); Karen Stoddard (karen,stoddard@centurvlink.com); bryan richardson(cable.comcast_c: r Subject: Review requested for proposed street vacation of Old Mission Avenue (STV-2014-0001) Good afternoon! Please review attached proposal to vacate approximately 3,688 square feet of Old Mission Avenue at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway. Comments are requested by Monday, December 29,2014. Thank you!! Karen Kendall, Manner City of Spokane Valley Permit Center 11703 East Sprague Avenue, Suite B-3 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 509.720.5026 direct 509.688.0037 fax www.spokanevalley.orgf perm i is 1 EXHIBIT 6 Karen Kendall From: Boyle Bob <bboyle@hansonind.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2014 3:19 PM To: Karen Kendall Subject: STV-2014-0001 Karen:we do not object to the City vacating this portion of land along Old Mission Avenue and are in favor of it.The Owner has done a great job with its development and fantastic improvements to the parking/access to the Centennial Trail.Thank you. Bob Boyle, Hanson Industries, Inc.; adjacent property owner. I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter. SPAMfighter has removed 30408 of my spam emails to date. Do you have a slow PC?Try a free scan! 1 j� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT !!'r* P�,NSN NNS STV 2014 - 0001 Old Mission Avenue Street Vacation Public Hearing January 8, 2015 Sikikane COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : P °►NN�NG .0.0 Valley DIVISION Pi + . . 1. - .7!-.i1719f M . Area of proposed .So CM ; '5125.!0 ■ • r, street vacation < . . . ..- f 45124.■138 . ---- - 1._ L • ti i Augusta. �_1 11+ ,' ' X45124.42 04 -9" 5q ■ r A q 0 • 5 } +J • - ,'• 4512•.0140 ' 1� ■ :9 . ..... {J'. ate- - _. .. .� `•' ,Y1{ 2 . .,_____._•__ _. 411„,m,120 _ , No..5.,, pi, QTY .. )0-1 _____ ..„.c. _ • lir.„ % . .. �' r w - - _ 45131.0117 6 51 31.0114 , t P- ' �. i a x V. tuji 79 n177 �r > . . . F - ■ =~= :- ._.– p..r- +15l.31•i'1l8 1513 1.03 15 .. } _=_ '1!1U1.U.0 2 SO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT "N PLANNING 4000 Val le- DIVISION 'per REQUEST: ill:L 4= -__t •• _ _ _ • i 1. 3,688 square feet of area - Ira i. .w f min m la �ipAto be vacated; :_ aItt ,_ te` I , I , � 1� ,, 2. Enhanced entry to the 2 \ { _ ,...P. . kL. y' ' trailhead a n d 47 }� development; "� ' _ _ 3. Provide delineation �� ACL • iCr riomiL ,�. r,_� -. between public & private.i k ,,,a...__ _is - � ownership; and , , �.- 'ce `�_ ,_, 4. Offset land lost by _- =fig dedication of ROW for Clir _,,,.....,,,--z,._ _ .. A+' -rF s"-rhe a r'''r=` -'. �. �''�R �L , t 1 k ` -. ' turnaroundand par ing � � v for trailhead (5,600sqft). ., likaiL yin,.y -:_�`` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P °►NN�NG DIVISION FACING EAST Approximate F... location of vacation C lit . 4. -SI ."; iso r �:�"'a� i, rl� y I ___ +r. 4 ...."\,-, Sidicane .......Val fey COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . . win, , PlikN N IN G DIVISION 4.7.,.:. i., FACING WEST . . ,.. _ _ _. ., ,, ... ,, .._. ............_ ., . .. _ .,.., , _ „...,..„.„ .„., PONSIE II COMING SOON . MN ; i -41Viiiiifffl ' '''' 1: 1 ri 1, 0 - 1 . 1 - — • 509.83B-1606 II 1 --- II _- ,--,igft., ...iv —iamierq_. 7 -, --. - -10111 '-'7, - --4411 -.‘-- ' 11 ' _ ... .;- ... ,r ,.- .. ....., .- „,„,„ .• — 4.--,---"„,1. ',- ',..z:..04.-,...,ir. _ '';. , g .--- - 0 --____711" d '17 _ - __ , ....,.....,._„..___.,.,,„, ._ .. _. _ _ .. . .., _ -.- - - ' ,-- i I y,k _ "r0Lir ', ' J.c.• .2 ,... , ___•=, .... r. -' ._,.. X ege*S1'-'=„,fAtir, - - --- #5; '.= --: ..“--,,'"*- +. •,' - - r ,r+ - .1+._ Approximate .-.,. g A' - ' c4i • • _ r - . location of vacation -,.. ---- - ----= '.- - _ — ii... , - • , - ....- - , •-•- 1 - i - ... , .„ -+ -, r ,_, • , p .a- , Ps 'al. ....e....... ww. F-T-- LA' NNING soo—ka. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION .. .., ...0 14; .. 0 ur Area of proposed - -- --(1 . 0 i ,..1 :--- . ' . ... .- .•. , . .._ ,... .. / _•., : , , _.... . 11,. -: , street vacation ... 6' • - 1 -- - • e 7 E* 0 . I • •, .. l :'6 1C ' •, i _ _ • ., ..s. I Er V- '= • .. . , 'Me ., :0 :! -=2•=M r=f1C EI , • ,,,..,.,. 7KFOEC FAI 16E . . ) S ,- . 0 , ,IF l'',7,7 '-'"'".'" ,MK M4kF ,En=11,RTFEI=1 _. .:: .• i.Li:4• 4. :,. . , . it A ‘'.• .--'1II% ' II li Olik 1101101015.7.7-...- . • A I/ • - :,,.t• % •.110%111 LL -- .... , ..• .• 1 D _ MP . :::.,: __-----,:. :-=-;-4 — ---- MP.:111.1"411, • I . , „I.' :.: '.•.: MISSION A.:',. . . ....•.r...„0„.• ,..:„.„..„ -6-$.-r7i. ‘% . • ,.. -1 ..:,.. ..._ , _ 0 . :104, .. ---=zml ,T.. --7:1-- , .-.., ft, \ +. , • . . .. ... - , . . ... =-...7,--.. 0 a ,, . I_ ..•±.6•Li:j I ..::.' _ H — - '•:•P 2 _ L -, ••.,.: —,.--- ',A—"-;.5.'-`-- --- .• ...,- 111 ,,.,1 , '-' .-_, •C'.---'''.----'--- ,'; .. II* ,/ ,,,•1'•_ ,..$ / LN. Entrance to „,.... . . ,.:-_,.› 7;;,,, ..... .. ./. development 0 2>1 • 0'c\ cp• Sidewalk connection 0\5 DETAILSto trailhead and established utilities j� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT , P�,NSN NNS PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING 0 • Posted in 3 places • City Hall, Center Place, Valley Library Z • Published in the Valley Herald on 12- 19- 14 and 12-26- Itt 14 Written notice to abutting property owners and those within 400 feet as provided by the applicant. Signs posted at each end of proposed vacation area sP>kaiNie, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,'� PLANNING DIVISION SVMC Title 22. 140 (Street Vacations) tin � PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Q • Street connectivity (Arterial Street Plan) Z • Traffic volumes a • Future development and access • 5 Findings from SVMC 22. 140.030.A 'Cr iieyCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION SVMC Title 22. 140.030.A (summarized findings) 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better ‘>?., serve the public? The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general ICC public and does not impede access or circulation. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? LI= The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not LL" being utilized for public use or access and is not required for current or futurep ublic use or access. In 9 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P °►NN�N 1 iiey DIVISION SVMC Title 22.140.030.A (summarized findings continued) tn 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? >" No. There is no need for a new and different public way. ICC 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? CC It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of the subject right-of-way for public LLB access. Currently there is no Spokane Transit Authority (STA) service in area. Further conversation with STA indicated that future development will likely warrant an STA bus route. At that time they will have the flexibility to work with the City and/or property owner to assess the best location for a bus stop along Mission and Indiana Parkway. 10 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P °►NN�N 1 iiey DIVISION SVMC Title 22.140.030.A (summarized findings continued) tn 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or >" alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? ICC Staff received 1p ublic comment and comments from Avista Utilities, Spokane County Utilities and Consolidated Irrigation CC District. LLB 11 iiey COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVAL with conditions to the City Council iiey COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �' PLANNING (� ij-E $ TIONS ? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: January 8, 2015 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-2014-0006 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing–Amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: A text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 20.30.060, Time Extensions to change the granting of a single, one-year time extension to a three-year time extension with the Director granting additional one-year extensions beyond the initial three-year extension.The text amendment will also include the elimination of the circumstances in 20.30.060(A-C). GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: Staff has encountered recent situations in which the property owner/applicant is unable to fulfill the requirements of the preliminary plat even with the one-year time extension. Circumstances have occurred that the developer/applicant can't control. Going beyond the single,three year time extension allows the Director to analyze the specific proposal with the established criteria as well as evaluating the good-will effort progress of the project.The Planning Commission conducted a study session on this amendment on November 13,2014. NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendment to SVMC was sent to the Spokane Valley News Herald for publishing on December 12,2014 and December 19,2014.Notice for the proposed amendment was provided consistent with applicable provisions of SVMC Title 17. APPROVAL CRITERIA: SVMC Section 17.80.150(F)provides approval criteria for text amendments to the SVMC. The criterion stipulates that the proposed amendment(s)must be consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan and bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to recommend approval of CTA-2014-0006, amendment to SVMC 20.30.060 changing the granting of a single one-year time extension to a three— year time extension with the Director granting additional one year extensions beyond the initial three-year extension. The text amendment also includes the elimination of the circumstances listed in 20.30.060(A- C). Findings of Fact will be provided at the meeting following the motion. The findings will be drafted subsequent to the motion for review and approval by the Planning Commission. STAFF CONTACT: Micki Harnois-Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Staff Report and Findings CTA-2013-0006 B. Proposed SVMC Revisions COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Siokane PLANNING DIVISION lle STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION CTA-2014-0006 STAFF REPORT DATE: December 31,2014 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: January 8, 2015, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A text amendment proposing to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 20.30.060, Time Extensions to change the granting of a single, one-year time extension to a three-year time extension with the Director granting additional one year extensions beyond the initial three-year extension. The text amendment change would also include the elimination of 20.30.060 (A-C) APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 17 General Provisions. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends the Planning Commission approve the changing of a single, one-year time extension to a three-year time extension with the Director granting additional one-year extensions beyond the initial three-year extension. The amendment would also change the circumstances listed in 20.30.060(A-C). STAFF PLANNER:Micki Harnois,Planner,Community Development Department ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Proposed text amendment to SVMC 20.30.060, Time Extensions A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. APPLICATION PROCESSING: SVMC Chapter 17.80, Permit Processing Procedures. The following summarizes application procedures for the proposal. Process Date Published Notice of Public Hearing: December 12-12-14 and 12-19- 14 Sent Notice of Public Hearing to staff/agencies: December 8, 2014 SEPA Checklist Routed for comments December 8,2014 DNS issued December 26,2014 2. PROPOSAL BACKGROUND: The proposal is to modify Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapter 20.30.060. The intent is to create flexibility in the granting of time extensions when Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2014-0006 circumstances arise that are out of the developer's control.This would also allow the Director to analyze the specific proposal with the established criteria as well as evaluating the good-will effort progress of the project. The proposed amendment will change the granting of a single,one-year time extension to a three- year time extension with the Director granting additional one year extensions beyond the initial three-year extension. The following table shows comparable jurisdictions' allowable time extensions: Jurisdiction 1st time 2nd time 3rd time, etc City of Kennewick n/a n/a n/a City of Kent 1 year 1 year on-going City of Lacey 1 year 1 year on-going City of Liberty Lake 3 years No No City of Pasco n/a n/a n/a City of Spokane 1 year No No City of Spokane Valley 1 year No No Spokane County 3 years 1 year on-going City of Wenatchee n/a n/a n/a B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.150(F)Municipal Code Text Amendment Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Municipal Code Text amendment,if it finds that (1) The proposed text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; Staff Analysis: The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive plan goals for providing adequate supply of usable land for industry and maintaining a flexible and consistent regulatory environment, and preserving and protecting neighborhoods. Relevant Comprehensive Plan goals and policies are shown below: Land Use Policy -13.1 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,predictability and clear direction. Page 2 of 3 Staff Report and Recommendation CTA-2014-0006 Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate,monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable,cost-effective, and expeditious. Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity,consistency and predictability. (2) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Staff Analysis: The amendment bears substantial relation to public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment will make the development standards consistent for all commercial and industrial zones. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed text amendment is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the SVMC. 2. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Public Comments a. Findings: No public comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): Public noticing was completed for CTA-2014-0006 on December 8,2014. 3. Finding and Conclusions Specific to Agency Comments a. Findings: No agency comments have been received to date. b. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. C. OVERALL CONCLUSION The proposed code text amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plans policies and goals. D. STAFF RECOMMENDATION The Planning Division, after review and consideration of the applicable approval criteria, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed amendment to change the initial time extension to three years with the Director granting additional one year extensions beyond the initial three year extension. Staff's recommendation also includes the elimination of the listed circumstances listed in 20.30.060(A-C) Page 3 of 3 Chapter 22.30 Preliminary Short Subdivisions, Subdivisions and Binding Site Plans 20.30.060 Time extensions. An application form and supporting data for time extension requests must be submitted to the department at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the preliminary short subdivision,subdivision,or binding site plan.Time extension requests shall be processed as a Type I application pursuant to Chapter 17.80 SVMC. I The director department may approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions or changed development regulations which would render recording of the short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plan contrary to the public health,safety or general welfare_; and provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply: A. That some portion of the existing preliminary short subdivision,subdivision, or binding site plan has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; B. That the preliminary short subdivision,subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the applicant has taken substantial steps toward finalizing the plat or binding site plan,which shall include at least one of the following: 1. Surveying the lots within the development; 2. Arranging for public services to the site; 3. Obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan; and/or 1. Completing studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan approval; C. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extensions which the project sponsor would normally fund. If the conditions set forth in subsections A, B or C of this section arc met, tThe department may grant an single,initial onethree-year time extension.Additional one year extensions may be granted by the department-beyond the initial three--year extension. Prior to granting time extensions,the director department shall circulate the time extension request to affected agencies for comments.Additional or altered conditions recommended by the department or affected agencies may be required as a condition of this extension.This may also include new or updated City regulations deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety,or general welfare. City departments may also recommend additional or altered conditions. The department shall issue a written decision approving or denying the time extension request and provide copies to affected agencies,the applicant, and those parties requesting a copy of such decision. Appeals of a time extension shall be filed in a manner consistent with the provisions of Chapter 17.90 SVMC. sp°une`` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT N G Divrsiary _0-0 Val ley Planning Commission Public Hearing January 8, 2015 CTA-2014-0006 (Time Extensions) Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 20.30.060 Municipal Code Text Amendment 'Tirr S'°' ane " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Val ley :+jAlIln ".t.Ngiq2vLsIoN Plat Review and Approval Process Step • Preliminary Approval Step 2 • Design and Build Improvements Step 3 • Final Plat Approval Municipal Code Text Amendment Sa6kan COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT = ANG DISION - Valley . StepPreliminary1 PlatApproval Process • Conditions for Route to improvements Review Public Agencies Application Preliminary • Approval Process Notices and and Notify Approval Submitted SEPA Expires in 5 Begins Public of Application years (RCW 58.17) Final Plat must be submitted prior to expiration Municipal Code Text Amendment okane COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT °tAN istEl2vISION Val ley StepImproemsmusbe 2 - constructed prior to submitting Final Plat Build Improvements Construct Development Road p Constructio (pavement, Plan Engineering Construction curb, gutter, Submitted Reviews and Begins Approves Plans sidewalk) and Utility Improvements Municipal Code Text Amendment SPo'ane.000 Val ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �Divrsiory What happens if the 5 year approval expires ? • The plat can't be • Current Regulations recorded and the Allow: project dies; or — A single, one-year time extension may be approved . • Applicant can apply for — Time extension request time extension must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the plat. Municipal Code Text Amendment SpokaneCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .2',PtANNING DIVISION Examples of why the 5 year deadline may not be met? • Public utilities can not be extended due to a delay in a sewer lift station being constructed by the County • Waiting for approved revisions on a FEMA map • Conclusion: Our current regulations don 't allow for continued extensions Muhicipal Code Text Amendment. �� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ,; °_ lyDivrsiory Time Extensions allowed by State Law • RCW 58. 17. 140 (4) Any city can adopt by ordinance procedures which would allow extensions of time that may or may not contain additional or altered conditions and requirements. Municipal Code Text Amendment sp°une`` COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 011ANVISION ley Current Subdivision Regulations • Time extension request must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the plat. • A single, one-year time extension may be approved. Municipal Code Text Amendment ...-F-'‘---., :; `, ..0100110 j�,,� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DAN NG DIVISION - Comparable Jurisdiction's Allowable Time Extensions 4.Jurisdiction 3rd time, etc City of Kennewick n/a n/a n/a City of Kent 1 year 1 year on-going City of Lacey 1 year 1 year on-going City of Liberty Lake 3 years No No City of Pasco n/a n/a n/a City of Spokane 1 year No No City of Spokane Valley 1 year No No Spokane County 3 years 1 year on-going City of Wenatchee n/a n/a n/a SOokane COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT StANEG DivrsIary Staff Recommendation 1 . Initial three-year time extension 2 . Additional one year extensions at the discretion of the Director (additional or altered conditions may be required ) Municipal Code Text Amendment CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Review Meeting Date: January 8, 2015 Item: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ®information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment—CPA-2015-0001 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1st of the following year. Applications received prior to November 1st are considered by the Planning Commission in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. The Planning Commission will review the following Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPAs) and make a recommendation to City Council. City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. CPA-2015-0001 is a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Office (0) with and Office (0) zoning classification to a Community Commercial (C) Comprehensive Plan designation with a Community Commercial (C) zoning classifications. If approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment, the site will automatically receive a zoning designation consistent with the new land use designation. NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendments will be placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald and the site will be posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign no later than January 7, 2015, with a description of the proposal. Individual notice of the proposals will be mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA REVIEW Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) an environmental checklist was required for the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are considered "non-project actions" defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the physical development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklist and a threshold determination was made for the proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. A Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was 1 of 2 issued for the proposed amendment consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance on December 12, 2014. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1 —CPA-2015-0001 Staff Report Exhibit 2 — Presentation — Note: A single presentation is provided for CPA-2015-0001 and CPA-2015-0002. 2 of 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION CITY OF 1 Orae DRAFT STAFF REPORT TO THE Valle Y PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2015-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: December 15,2014 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: January 22,2015,beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers,Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. Project Number: CPA-2015-0001 Application The application is a privately initiated site-specific comprehensive plan map Description: amendment requesting to change the designation from Office (0)with an Office (0)zoning classification to a Community Commercial(C)designation with a Community Commercial(C)zoning classification. Location: Parcels 45104.9145, 45104.9146, 45104.9156 & 45104.9157 addressed as 13110, 13120& 13220 E.Nora Avenue; generally located 1300 feet west of the intersection of Mamer Rd and Nora Avenue; further located in the SW 1/4 of the SE I/4 of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. Applicant(s): Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagator,LLC 7607 W. Gratz Drive Boise,ID 83709 Owner(s): Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagator,LLC 7607 W. Gratz Drive Boise,ID 83709 Date of Application: October 29,2014 Date Determined October 29,2014 Complete Staff Contact: Christina Janssen,Planner (509)720-5333 christina.j anssen@spokanevalley.org APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 17 General Provisions,Title 19 Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 3: Zoning Map Exhibit 4: Aerial Map Staff Report CPA-2015-0001 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and The site is approximately 3.22 acres in size. The northern most 2/3 Characteristics: of the site is generally flat and covered with natural vegetation. South of this the site slopes upward at approximately 30%is covered with mature evergreen trees and other vegetation. Comprehensive Plan: Office (0) Zoning: Office (0) Existing Land Use: Three parcels are vacant and one parcel is being used for single family residential. 2. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan—Regional Commercial (RC) Zoning—Regional Commercial(RC) Existing Land Uses—Nora Avenue,I-90 and Commercial South Comprehensive Plan—High Density Residential (HDR) Zoning—High Density Multifamily Residential district(MF-2) Existing Land Uses—Multifamily dwelling units East Comprehensive Plan—Office (0) Zoning—Office (0) Existing Land Uses—Commercial and Retail West Comprehensive Plan—Office (0) Zoning—Office (0) Existing Land Uses—Single family residential and professional office. B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls),the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on December 12, 2014. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled. C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria Page 2 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2015-0001 i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that(analysis is italicized): (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The Community Commercial classification is intended to serve several neighborhoods. The Comprehensive Plan states that Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. The amendment is consistent with the size requirement; the location's visibility along the 1-90 corridor lends itself to regional services/business'. However, the access to the area is limited and not conductive to regional development. The reclassification may improve marketability of the property and the public health, safety, and general welfare should be promoted by standards established by the City's development regulations. (2)The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. The amendment provides a suitable land use designation consistent with the City's GMA compliant Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: The location of I-90 adjacent to the site does not appear to be conducive to residential development or office uses since the land has sat vacant. Residential uses in the area have been converted to office or commercial uses while the remaining residential uses appear to be on the decline. Other commercial uses located in the area have been successful. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment does not correct a mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: There are no known physical characteristics that could create difficulties in developing the property under the proposed designation. This is a non project action and future development will be evaluated for compliance with all environmental requirements. (2) The effect on open space, streams,rivers,and lakes; Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, aquifer recharge areas,fish and wildlife habitat areas,frequently flooded Page 3 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2015-0001 areas or geologically hazardous areas. The site is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: The integration of commercial development on the south side of Interstate 90 should provide services for local economic demand and is consistent with other businesses located in that corridor. The topography provides a natural barrier between a commercial designation and the multi family development located adjacent to the site at a significantly higher elevation. Development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations will ensure compatibility with the existing neighborhood. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities,roads,public transportation,parks,recreation,and schools; Analysis: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. At the time of the submittal of any building permit applications, an additional SEPA review may be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment in regards to transportation. Currently the site is served with all utilities and improved public roads. (3) The benefit to the neighborhood,City, and region; Analysis: The proposed site-specific map amendment should not affect the existing character of the surrounding neighborhood and will likely promote the most appropriate use of property. Commercial development of this property will support the existing commercial uses in the area. Vacant property does not create a population base necessary for businesses to thrive. (4) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: The land has sat vacant and it can be concluded that the property's current land use designation does not meet the desirable market criteria for office uses. The City has ample office designated land along the Argonne/Mullan, Pines, and Evergreen Corridors available for development or redevelopment. The proposed amendment should create a marketable piece of property that is more compatible with uses located in the vicinity. (5) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The amendment will have no impact on population density and does not demand population analysis. (6) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. 2. Compliance with SVMC Title 19 Zoning Regulations a. Findings: Page 4 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2015-0001 The proposed privately initiated site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment is requesting to change the designation from Office (0) with an Office (0)zoning classification to Community Commercial (C) designation with a Community Commercial (C) zoning classification. The Community Commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15 to 17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan amendments or through subarea planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. Pursuant to SVMC 19.30.030 (B) all site specific zoning map amendments must meet all the following criteria: a. The requirements of SVMC 22.20,Concurrency; As stated in previous analysis, future development of the site will be required to meet the concurrency standards at the time of building permit issuance. b. The requested map is consistent with the Comprehensive plan; As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. c. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare; As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare. d. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan or because of a need for additional property in the proposed zoning district classification, or because the proposed zoning classification is appropriate for reasonable development of the subject property; The proposed amendment and zone change is reasonable for the development of the property. e. The property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include corner touches and property located across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or higher zoning classification; The property located north of the subject property has a Regional Commercial land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan and a Regional Commercial zoning designation. The subject property meets the requirement. f. The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; The surrounding land uses include multifamily residential, retail and office uses. The existing land uses are compatible with the proposed land use designation and zoning district. g. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole; The amendment will provide an opportunity to redevelop a property that is currently vacant with little chance of redevelopment as currently zoned. The Community Commercial Page 5 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2015-0001 designation would allow for a wider variety of commercial development with prime freeway exposure. b. Conclusion(s): Pursuant to RCW 36.70a.130(2)(a), proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan will be processed only once a year except for the adoption of original subarea plans, amendments to the shoreline master program, the amendment of the capital facilities chapter concurrent with the adoption of the City budget, in the event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the Comprehensive Plan filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board. The proposed amendment is consistent SVMC Title 19 and state law regarding Comprehensive Plan amendments. 3. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan a. Findings: The community commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan amendments or through sub-area planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure compatibility. In addition, light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in commercial zones may be allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses or zoning districts. The proposed site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment will provide additional development opportunities in an area with good visibility and which has been unable to prosper under the current zoning designation. The proposed site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment is generally consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Goal LUG-4: Transform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the community image and economic vitality. Goal EDG-1: Encourage diverse and mutually supportive business development and the expansion and retention of existing businesses within the City for the purpose of emphasizing economic vitality, stability and sustainability. Goal EDG-2:Encourage redevelopment of commercial/industrial properties within the City. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's Adopted Comprehensive Plan. 4. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan require that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. Page 6 of 7 Staff Report CPA-2015-0001 The amendment is currently served with both public water and sewer. Nora Avenue and Mamer Road, both local access streets,provide roadway access and tie into Mission Avenue to the south and Pines Road to the west. Pines Road is a designated state roadway and Mission Avenue is a minor arterial road according to Map 3.1 of the City's adopted Arterial Street Plan. Spokane County Fire District No. 1 will provide fire protection service, the City of Spokane Valley Police Department will provide police service and Spokane Transit Authority (STA)will provide public transit service. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any public comments to date. 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments to date. 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. Page 7 of 7 il9 .. CPA-2015-0001 Aerial Photo _. - = = _ F 45104.9012 45103.02 2 4 45103:0279 45104.9064 ° „ - 45103.0281 "- - iI - 9a 90 Y. -, _ _ — Nora Av .". -- _. _--________ p.. 7 N -- SAO �* f�.�, o 45104.9056' 3 1 ..a _Y _, 0 45103:1304 45103:1303 • 45104.9055 1, ~��__ ~�� _ 45103.1502 �� ,ti.l _ p _ 45104.9151 �� , . is ., - s 3`.' - - ,' e s m '.---1-4--..R, x r 45104.9150 ur 45103.0202 • �.. 45103.1501 _. . sr5-- Mission `Av -. 45151.9016 45151.9030 I-_ 380.7 0 190.33 380.7 Feetel This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. * * CPA-2015-0001 Vicinity Map o * p` kI_ 45102.9011 L_ 117; 45105.9010 45116.9040 �' x 01 Marietta Av M rr 45x02.9111 N (40 .g9 c sOhr�41-- a e MI 45105.9068 Q0)� �� S 45115.9034 . a":..':-- L,,i awl" O _____ _____. ,,,,s, _, .„,...., , g 45095.90�°L , �`' v 45115.9033 $, v n; 45105.9133 iL\\\ JINN1 1 ° ma ,N 45103.0211 45103.0259 ✓f 45113.9025 m ■� Mansfield A4 I Ma-nsf.ield Ava�—�; �.�0 Lr.t .y 45104.9132 x 45103.0215 �� 45094.6001 �� .- 45094,0581 ��,h — �� _ — 1-- --MI 5.9079 �- 45105.0207 451 11111.'451/5"1111.0.:03�� / , ��- — lndiaria=Ay= r/u Montgomery Dr-- 0, 4 I '' g -- I --"" "11,1ii,tr ,- ' , - __.Nora AvSPaKANEr . 11.1 IL !fr Su Nora Av I ,- 45104.9150ili 451 3 90 Ing _ ale III 111',1 - 45142.9128 : s; v - 111i11�� . eJ!' ! tOAYI:: 11111r( rig7EFRI171 ui l3 ��' o, "-` A.11I ` . s ❑❑ aIP 1 �, iIdi1 r -'° 111 7TS'int ��-. . . Q3 . SlnfO-Av 111 f 4 l r I 7� I. J 1� 7d S.Into = ■ a„.40,...Q,'°- 6� p �' �p Av ' r %!le Sharp Av Sharp.Ay>�ro g� �Shar :3 IN' I ■ Pu mil .L l I' m� 7„ Ili p5ti<,- 45152.1002;_": �' BoonedAv- z MR 1111- m UM j I 1 a ��Roane.„P.,.in rii.,m_Bo1.one Av a ro 7, ,,, „,,, - soo1 : Av �� + T II Desmet Av a Desm'et Av ' Immo 1� Desmet Av a - 1_11 �� - Desmet_Av �� 4 �^ r _� 11 ME lona.. MI ild–P;ijr37— I ' m�c A - II - � 1 � S eLataldo. Av �■`'ataldo Av ag5151.1104 �..� Catald�o Avg ,” `�ro L Cataldo-Av_: — 1 1,7 �7 rli MISR = !45152.152 �a 45152.1814 Mallon :Ct. 45151.9012 IM aiEMIlon_Av rn rri1131 Ili■ Mallon A 1,980.8 0 990.41 1,980.8 Feet 0 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. to.A ''' CPA-2015-0001 45105.9068 45101.9094 o P/OS x504.9100 r, 45105-9010 . f/ 4515.9133 MU(' 1103-47„, ,Q 45103.0259= � 45103.0211 0 45104 9113 `-, a 45104.9128 Mansfield Av cil ' '11111111- t.n Ln CI a o o .Ln 4. p , ? _________ 45104.9132 45103.0215 rri Q Y Lo w �� I ' 4.11121- 12721 o r•-, w a w v 45097A001 Indiana Au o 73708 °f 45105.0207 13209 13518"` I ry --- �e 45104.9158 -- �h r 13410 13410 W 45104.9162 ~ �' I d�dna r 13518 r. 0. I ct O ° a I I'° r TW 12822 w �w N w N N w a. I 13110 �I4y N N uD N 94 �.✓ , w rrT.' 13418 ►� -�$LoraAv � � ry%�,'•� a2Q�� ''� ,r � .i14 s �; �S - ,moi -. -104 ii-i f�11;/p��ra-0 roi%� '�"'CI_ � 12918 mr' 0� � � �/ w o i+�'�7130 224. cz o p/N�,`'q e.l+ �j� �_ �� 13308 N N `fjr f 13007. -.0,7,0-4,-,,,,,,...„. °° �4�5104.0316 �SW-0�1<%&N1V-"AsL=L Y7. ��=�----:,,40.11620 iZ71512903 '^H 13107gage r �:' Ir. ,y 45104.0213 "^ /�� / 45103.0202 © 45104.9150 n 13 w 1 ei =.,53,--* i M p .J s O� -_. N 45103.0201 ! r+ a Itlir. O> C_ Ps ,./. __ - Ion-Av--- _ - 1{/1�ss� tr �� 1521] *IN �i 1nY27alr ,/ t ✓'%I >E ,- `�� N�',�� 11111 5151.9021 C'-1 1511��i5Q5 IGCB VP 1502 MaxvveIlTAv x5151`.9022 r, ty - %-//. !�� 142x• MF-1ro op 03D I �� ^�"' !�, 41Nigtall N w w 45 51.9016 45151.1703 033 e};�'� �.NNIN, 4 "� -Cf '��w1icdo�~i' � ww l 1416 45151 9025 1 10.7Ina 3_.---.- ma- - w / -Smto_Av lin E. 45151.1704 1 n _ PI 1309 u, °fl' 13(14 Lti:1/ 4: ria �'✓ nOs "' /I Z 45151.9014 F d 1.- ',.5'a a 1303 12Y4 � ' 1s o/ LT,_Sharp AJL* sem �� 11111 � 6 _ ,lilt N w.Emiji{,�1215�� f 0.,1/ �� Boone=Ln MD 1 45152.1002 M° -.,0,- .....-:*_ r 'irOF W r wPi i M Boone AV's ri 1,11,„ 17� w N ,- N us IAtit-Teti 4 1113.116 IN�1 � I N Jr��, n ur r. m in .4 _ 45152 1213 .__:_I 4esmet_Av- - 11111 1103 `N ini x 1 R-3 11Q2 _, 1312413204 li i 1111 0E3 asettrAn .. I :--: . 685.5 0 342.73 685.5 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an imm 1 Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may © not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. ;t4 CPA-2015-0001 Zoning Map 45104.9131 45103.0215 45097.0001 Indiana Av "Shannon, AV --- ... .-. _� __ 45105.0207 MU(' 45104.9161 45104.9163 ._�— ~ ---— 45104.9158 .r ,hd�ana�� 4514.9159 45104.9164 45104.9162 'L'). 0 45104,9054 45116.9079 • 111111111 , r' co 9U 90 = — Nora Av-. - /,4510�t04 i,-' 1/. �r , S '/ ''/45103:1304/. .07__ „...01-,) ff ® -, ..� 45104.9055 �".P '" . 4531:,. � '� ,� a yam/ / � N /. E/V�A=�/E ,� '�hjTr� �//�u W 45104.0316 -1-: ,. r - --, , . ----_. , . All Q. . 45103.0202 o. 45104.9150 -2 ter`. u, 45103.(7201 . .....;-::::g. / �' � 45 —.. �' T , . - - r Y 111111111111\ / I 151.1701 ro - ' /w R4.<,r"---- .1 7 �^ 066 _ � 45151.9016 to f 45151.0706 45152.0605 � p1 M a xwel l7Av— 2 45151.1703 I �' 45151.9025 __11 ( a / � a�5151.9flZ2 = ATF-1 45151,0708 � s70�%%- ):1_ 11111._ a,� R-3 if 45151.9023 li 9 761.3 0 380.66 761.3 Feet O This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Review Meeting Date: January 8, 2015 Item: Check all that apply: ❑consent ❑old business ❑new business ❑public hearing ®information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment—CPA-2015-0002 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from November 2nd to November 1st of the following year. Applications received prior to November 1st are considered by the Planning Commission in late winter/early spring of the following year, with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer. The Planning Commission will review the Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) and make a recommendation to City Council. City Council may choose to adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal, they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. CPA-2015-0002 is a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Single-family Residential (R-3) zoning classification to a Mixed Use Center (MUC) land use designation with a Mixed Use Center (MUC) zoning classification. If approved, the site will receive a zoning designation consistent with the new land use designation. NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendment has been placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald and the site will be posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, containing a description of the proposal no later than January 7, 2015. Individual notice will be mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the amendment. SEPA REVIEW Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) an environmental checklist was completed for the proposed amendment. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are considered "non-project actions" defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the physical development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklist and a threshold determination was made for the proposal. A Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was issued for the proposed amendment consistent with the SVMC Title 21 —Environmental Controls. STAFF CONTACT: 1 of 2 Martin Palaniuk, Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1 —CPA-2015-0002 Staff Report Exhibit 2—Presentation 2 of 2 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION S'ioliane ��alle STAFF REPORT TO THE Y PLANNING COMMISSION CPA-2015-0002 STAFF REPORT DATE: December 31,2014 HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: January 22,2015,beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers,Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley,Washington 99206. Project Number: CPA-2015-0002 Application Description: The application is a privately initiated, site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment seeking to change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation from Low Density Residential(LDR)with a Single- Family Residential(R-3)zoning classification to a Mixed Use Center (MUC)designation with a Mixed Use Center(MUC)zoning classification. Location: 1603 N Flora Rd,Parcel No.45124.0203, and 1625 N Flora Rd,Parcel No.45124.0151; generally located on the northwest corner of Mission Avenue and Flora Road; further located in the SE 1/4 of Section 12, Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane County,Washington. Applicant(s): Patricia Abraham 1920 N Greenacres Rd, Spokane Valley,WA 99216 Owner(s): Donald L Fisher Jayn Courchaine 1603 N Flora Rd 619 N Sargent Rd Spokane Valley,WA 99016 Spokane Valley,WA 99212 Date of Application: October 27,2014 Date Determined Complete November 1,2014 Staff Contact: Martin Palaniuk,Planner, (509) 720-5031, Lapalaniuk@spokanevalley.org APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Title 17 General Provisions,Title 19 Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 Environmental Controls. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2 Comprehensive Plan Map Exhibit 3: Zoning Map Exhibit 4: Aerial Map Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1. PROPERTY INFORMATION: Size and Combined,both parcels equal approximately 3.56 acres. The site is Characteristics: relatively flat with residential landscaping including trees and bushes. A round-about intersection is situated on the southeast corner of the site and is set at an elevation above the site. Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential(LDR) Zoning: Single-Family Residential District(R-3) Existing Land Use: Single-family residential use on both parcels.Mission Avenue runs east/west along the southern boundary and is also set at a higher elevation than the site. Flora Road runs north/south along the west boundary and drops in elevation from the round-about to ground level with the site. 2. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES: North Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential(LDR) Zoning—Single-Family Residential District(R-3) and Single-family Residential Urban District(R-4) Existing Land Uses—Single-family residential South Comprehensive Plan—Mixed Use Center(MUC) Zoning—Mixed Use Center(MUC) Existing Land Uses—Currently vacant. East Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential(LDR) Zoning—Single-family Residential Urban District(R-4) Existing Land Uses—Single-family Residential West Comprehensive Plan—Mixed Use Center(MUC) Zoning—Mixed Use Center(MUC) Existing Land Uses—Greenhouses and high density multi-family apartments B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA 1. Findings: Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls),the lead agency has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on December 12, 2014. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental checklist, the application, Spokane Valley Municipal Code Titles 19, 21, and 22, a site assessment, and public and agency comments, and other information on file with the lead agency. 2. Conclusion(s): The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21 have been fulfilled. Page 2 of 8 Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code a. Findings: SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map amendments if it finds that: (1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; Analysis: The Mixed Use Center (MUC) designation is more appropriate to the transportation facilities located along the boundaries. The new designation will allow uses more consistent with those occurring west and south of the site and with the roadways that intersect at the southeast corner of the site. Mission Avenue and Flora Road intersect in a round-about at the southwest corner of the property. Mission Avenue is identified in the City of Spokane Valley Arterial Street Plan as a proposed minor arterial. Flora Road is identified as a proposed minor arterial south of the intersection and as a collector north of the intersection. The Comprehensive plan states the minor arterial street system interconnects with and augments the principal arterial system. It accommodates trips of moderate length at a lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. Minor arterials place more emphasis on land access than the principal arterial. Minor arterials may carry local bus routes and provide intra-community continuity, but ideally does not penetrate identifiable neighborhoods. Collector Streets provide both land access and traffic circulation within residential neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas. It differs from the arterial system in that facilities from the collector system may penetrate residential neighborhoods, distributing trips from arterials through the area to their ultimate destinations. Conversely, the collector system collects traffic from the local streets in residential neighborhoods and channels it into the arterial system. Higher densities are encouraged along transit corridors. The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within a development. Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and could include uses such as office, retail and/or lodging along higher density residential uses. The existing minor arterial roadways combined with the high density residential development that has occurred west of the site combine to make the amendment consistent with the long-term objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole. The proposed amendment is located near services and a designated Spokane Transit Authority (STA) bus route. The public health, safety, and general welfare should be promoted by standards established by the state and the City's regulations. (2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; Page 3 of 8 Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the comprehensive land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. The amendment provides a suitable land use designation consistent with the City's GMA compliant Comprehensive Plan. (3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Analysis: Significant changes have occurred in the area of the proposed amendment. A 324-unit apartment complex has been constructed along Indiana Avenue and Mission Avenue less than 1/4 of a mile west of the site. The complex consists of a mix of buildings with either 24 dwelling units or 12 dwelling units and a clubhouse. The property lying north of the sight was rezoned in 2012 from R-3 to R- 4 and subdivided into 53 single-family residential lots. The property east and southeast of the site are zoned R-4 and consists of single-family dwellings. The amendment is a reasonable extension of the existing Mixed Use Center designation located adjacent to the west and south of the site based on the changed conditions. (4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or Analysis: The amendment does not correct a mapping error. (5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan amendments: (1) The effect upon the physical environment; Analysis: There are no known physical characteristics that could create difficulties in developing the property under the proposed designation. This is a non project action and future development will be evaluated for compliance with all environmental requirements. (2) The effect on open space, streams,rivers, and lakes; Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically hazardous areas. The site is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues. (3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Analysis: Development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations will ensure compatibility with the existing neighborhood. The use of fencing and screening will provide visual separation and physical buffers between land uses. New multifamily development is required to meet a 1:1 height to setback ratio when abutting a single family use or zone and a 10 foot minimum setback. New commercial development must meet 20 foot setbacks when adjacent to a residential use or zone. In addition, Type 1 screening is required for commercial development adjacent to any residential zone Page 4 of 8 Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 (4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities,roads,public transportation,parks,recreation, and schools; Analysis: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for transportation, sewer, and water facilities. At the time of development, an additional SEPA review may be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s)on the physical environment and transportation. (5) The benefit to the neighborhood,City, and region; Analysis: The proposed site-specific map amendment may have significant benefit to the area by creating opportunity for small scale commercial development to serve the neighborhood. The site is located at the intersection of two minor arterial roadways. Minor arterials serve to disperse and collect traffic to and from neighborhoods. Mixed use development would serve the multi family and single-family residential development occurring in the area and would be ideally located at the intersection of two arterial roadways. (6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; Analysis: As shown in Figure 2.1 of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan, 3.5% of the land in the City is designated for Mixed-use Center. The Mixed-use Center designation would allow for two or more different land uses within developments under this designation. Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and/or lodging along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or cultural facilities. Compatibility between uses is achieved through design which integrates certain physical and functional features such as transportation systems, pedestrian ways, open areas or court yards, and common focal points or amenities. (7) The current and projected population density in the area; and Analysis: The amendment will have marginal impact on population density and does not demand population analysis since the increase in density is isolated to 3.5 acres. (8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Analysis: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have minimal impact on other aspects of the plan. 2. Compliance with SVMC Title 19 Zoning Regulations a. Findings: The proposal is to change the comprehensive plan designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with a Single-Family Residential (R-3) zoning classification to Mixed-use Center (MUC) designation with a Mixed-use Center(MUC)zoning classification. Future development on the site will be subject to the provisions in SVMC 19.110. Pursuant to SVMC 19.30.030 (B) all site specific zoning map amendments must meet all the following criteria: a. The requirements of SVMC 22.20,Concurrency; Spokane County Utilities provides sewer throughout the City of Spokane Valley. Specific sewer requirements would be addressed at the time of development however Page 5 of 8 Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 sewer facilities exist in the area and are available to the site. Consolidated Irrigation District #19 is the water purveyor for this area. Water requirements will be coordinated with the water district at the time development is proposed. As discussed previously, the site is situated at the corner of two minor arterial roadways and is well served by the transportation system. The proposed amendment meets concurrency requirements. b. The requested map is consistent with the Comprehensive plan; As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. c. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare; As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare. d. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with the Comprehensive Plan or because of a need for additional property in the proposed zoning district classification, or because the proposed zoning classification is appropriate for reasonable development of the subject property; The recent high density residential development that has occurred north and west of the site have changed the character of this area. The improvements made to Mission Avenue west of the site and the construction of the round-about at the intersection of Mission Avenue and Flora Road combine to make the site appropriate for mixed use development. e. The property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include corner touches and property located across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or higher zoning classification; The properties located west and south of the subject property have a Mixed-Use Center land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan and a Mixed-Use Center zoning designation. The subject property meets the requirement. f. The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the immediate vicinity of the subject property; The site is surrounded by a mix of high density multi family use and higher density single-family uses. A commercial green house is located adjacent to the site along its western boundary. Existing land uses are compatible, or will be made compatible, with the application of development regulations at the time of development.- g. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole; The amendment will allow mixed-use, commercial, or high density residential development of property ideally located at the intersection of two minor arterials. b. Conclusion(s): Pursuant to RCW 36.70a.130(2)(a), proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan will be processed only once a year except for the adoption of original subarea plans, amendments to the shoreline master program, the amendment of the capital facilities chapter concurrent with the adoption of the City budget, in the event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the Comprehensive Plan filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board. The proposed amendment is consistent SVMC Title 19 and state law regarding Comprehensive Plan amendments. 3. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan a. Findings: Page 6 of 8 Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 The Mixed Use Center (MUC) designation provides for mixed use development consistent with the development that is occurring on adjacent properties. It will provide an opportunity to develop uses that will serve surrounding residential uses. The proposed amendment is compatible with the Mixed Use Center west and south of the site and single-family residential urban use located north and east of the site. The amendment is generally consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies. Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Goal LUG-5 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit. Goal HG-1 Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. Goal EDG-7 Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency, predictability and clear direction. Goal NG-3 Encourage neighborhood/sub-area planning for commercial, industrial and mixed use properties to enhance the quality, vibrancy and character of existing development. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's Adopted Comprehensive Plan. 4. Adequate Public Facilities a. Findings: The Growth Management Act(GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is available for occupancy. The amendment is currently served with public water and sewer. Mission Avenue and Flora Road will provide transportation access. As previously stated both roads are classified as minor arterials according to Map 3.1 of the City's adopted Arterial Street Plan. Spokane County Fire District No. 1 will provide fire protection service, the City of Spokane Valley Police Department will provide police service and Spokane Transit Authority (STA) will provide public transit service. b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development. D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any public comments to date. 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. Page 7 of 8 Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002 E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS 1. Findings: Staff has not received any agency comments to date. 2. Conclusion(s): No concerns are noted. Page 8 of 8 9 '. Aerial Map CPA-2015-0002 ,_ - 'a KnoxAv ire:• n" 11' ,� -- _ , • • 'n -� >, Indian . iw Indianav �-1• 0. , ,,- t Bald _ �� win Av ° V _ u_ ,■: . Deschutes Ln �' o ft 1,r 1- _ ro B - aidwln Av 0. E. Nc0.s AV Nora Av ■ Nora >1. i. f - - -- tusta Ln ° I ski Mission AV Old Mission q - 111 n. -s j T O. — •1 . oc A `IMaxwell Av y ''�`at` i n \4041 „. ..{ - �T��. +► P Av1. ` ��`. �� Shar 1 0 a` • 1., a • , 7 gam_` a , "�...rE. :. 913.3 0 456.67 913.3 Feet O This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. Ci� ` Vicinity Map CPA-2015-0002 411101. \\;:,.,p---7 r actekt o / __L__ _r, -ITO a ro ro . \ Montgomery Av —H—\:,----:16,,%.., 77 i\ / __:— _ /; Mansfield Av a c Michielli Av i— m Knox Av '' Indiana=Av ______,, MI c=�lnd'+ana=Av—� 1! z z 1 o Affan�Lr 71 ❑. Bald van Avg — 3. Baldwin AV f i r o 1 3 Nora Av Nora Av fJo t -Ln V. 73":-ML For ;tSPOK LLEY Rd n Mission=Av= ro ro "` • o Q. � D Maxwell-AV 7hd'ana Air v, ae' 1 I " ro —5'intio=Av Ira- n ra rp I; rt Q, 73 T r LiSYiar-p=Avg �o _ Boong:Ay Boorre Avoone Av �QSfiet.Ct a i pesmet AviHi.,,_ CAV_4 4o a II n is ` .. — Cataldo Av slor►,��, c�, n CataldnP, rt CadoAV IL__ n o, I —� — 41Br:oad.wayAv= coV n in .� f,..": 'SlYr- Av-Av d o�Broadway-==+�� n „ o = co Alfci�Av---------r------5— xi- Springfield Av �� a a a 2,283.3 0 1,141.67 2,283.3 Feet O This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. .• Comprehensive Plan Map CPA-2015-0002 Knox=Av ., / ,/ ill: • +^ ss 0 mil= =-.-1 ,? \ { 45124.0105 45124.0108 co co lig I IN a n � ��' f cn 4 —� 7 MMMI n ?:1"------ •,--___-__-Andiana-Av= EMI �I Indiana Av-- -� a: .� /FL , N, © - I�_� '- v1 • 111. — 6aldwin:AV 11 � o CD iii Deschutes LnCr ' cc i1. a N I o cin f o U 3 N ,�, O , A o / O - a i w PavvIicIiisrial a v �� lldwln Av� w = 45125.9157 2 y U 6a o © w 1a .-r mg VI 7 Lo <� �� ~ �� o 7s '�-�. 55073.1439�, NOra-Ln w N4°-1 AV Nora-Av- mmi GI Ln I v �� 55073.1450 i ' - r `-'1, `.-i°. r ; r- MOM��IN 1♦ to Ln;r' 0 yid c 45124.0 1V to: un ~ o n 45124.0138 gusts Ct7. Q o E. Ln VALLEY "' I I �� r45124.0204 :1{4 $ 1♦ 1 art1 \ - Mission AV Old Mission it, leiResidentli 1111 p Q � MI 1111 �•'• 0.� r' o� 4IIII to Mixed Use Center Maxwell.AV y ® 55182.0104 ui Park/Open Space j r �. 45131.0114 45131.0116 1 45131.0117crl 55182.Q813 14 45131.0104 =I' I� U 45131.0103 , MN I �N` I� 1 to m ,, N Sharp Av = I� I 45135.0314 Pv 45131.0107 Ss�� i� o °,° ;_, °,° .-I-P--.k: !,,,, „ 1IN�'an 45131.0501 ?1d1a' �I �� r ti n ` -\ c) ---1 913.3 0 456.67 913.3 Feet 0 This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. . '• Zoning Map CPA-2015-0002 11111 Knox.Av� � -I ^ 0� iiii 45124.0105 n. ' �� r 3p 8 o �' cP� R-2 45124.0108 lia a 3 - „I - ^ a v Indiana Av — 73 lii 7 1r3diana Av- ❑, x :1‘-`; Aiss n .: .. .. : ::� Baldwin Av o J III r Deschutes •Ln , 45125.9157,1-2ro Lr � Baldwin .Av, II jl� °� -1,7',. _oP/OS � fi ::. ::_ rn ? A..:: � �``� `I -- - 1_R 4 (01 55073.1439 INora_Ln, w . . .. , Nara .AyA fir ' o 55073.1450 ' i, � Lp al o ION" i. 1♦ lista Ln a ,i r, ry 45124.0 1 1� a.:` �1 z„ o kr) 45124v- Ln .0138 gl15tS Ct-_– a o `� SPOKANE VALLEY uki ru, 45124.0204 � .a 1♦, - � ,-Av - -- �o i\ 55lS2OlO4 N N ° -42 AIIIC -� - o t> Maxwell Au_- y ti R-3 45131.0114 4. \� -a--:: :::•:: -:: n LII 45131.0117 -__.. m....–. IP— ' 45131.01161\ 55182.0813 - :.-rn 45131.0104 ::--�+-±I 45131.0103 L11. 111 00 v, . l w °° Sharp AV.:: , 7 DC 45135.0314 V 45131.0107 ° gs:a- -. SS. o - a N r' ,naianilk 13 .0501 J 21�� II w F ww i 913.3 0 456.67 913.3 Feet Ilrit This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. iiey COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT7, PLANNING DIVISION 2015 Comprehensive Plan Amendments January 8, 2015 s'5N— COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING vralley DIVISION Cornprehensive Planning The Spokane VComprehensive Plan SVCP is the City's guide for growth and development. _4\ - Infrastructure • Residential • Industrial • Buildings • Roads • Commercial • Services • Sewer • Office • Financing • Recreation • Water • Utilities Land Use ` Capital Facilities Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2 sP>kanme,, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLNN 4:. DIVISION SVCP Amendment Process • City Council approves official docket Docket • November 1st cut off for applications (60-day notice) • Planning Commission recommendation Legislative • City Council approval • Growth Management Hearing Board Appeals Comprehensive Plan Amendments 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P1►NN�N -T7 >at, 4 DIVISION Privately Initiated Map Amendment Project Number CPA-2015-0001 Applicant: Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagator LLC 7607 W. Gratz Drive Boise, ID 83709 Applicants Stanley M. Schwartz Representative: Witherspoon Kelley 422 W. Riverside Avenue Suite #100 Spokane, WA 99201 Application Description Request to change parcels 45104.9145, 45104.9146, 45104.9156 & 45104.9157 from Office to Community Commercial SpOkane : PLANNING 4.0...milky COMMUNIllf DEVELOPMENT -EMVISION ,)3 II 1 I. ,-2----,0. --kWh A, L11. , ----- 1 45105.9068 l -1 1., S MIIII,1 4 rt- --- - - -t 45095.9062 -'' ,1 , st - h--, 112. . N -17 I ,--- o 54 105.9133 - li - III) ..\ ,,,,,m, 0259 LA ...e , 45103.0211 -,----3 e Or ... .... • • 4511191325 _II ivianslield-01--- -='-.1% i - -- ij -',.--,,._.._,7 ,4., \„---->.-----1 117-----• --- LI --- 45104.9132 0 , 45094 6001 x--, 45103.021, , i 1-• 31 11 h 11— 1 ._•- • 1 1 - 1111111111111111411141 PIN 11•11 1`;'..--11 1 X. . — --- ---1__J- ,_ -- -7°,.,PI - • / -411.7 xmliiii - - - ,. , 27---1—"Tr 11MP, i .411-*- s 0 OC i••• Nbra.Av c- i SPOKANE VAL-1,EY ___I 45104.91,50 , ...._ • Ili Ih.....,.._ s 4.311; OM 71 m -- , 11-1. -- H HI - I T indi \ M i SS Con-Av - -Ficil 7-9-1 .. F---,.4,,- II .1122 al _ . , 45142,9128 ---_,.:ium in --u _ - a. I 111,Milli' ,V., •Fri r vs Q., cq • 11-- ;,./. i .1• isi .1,Mill , , ..... Ill . ..! ' I 1 ''s,) I 1411-11-Vaxwell Alv .-., Ill_ 111 urt or, Ma xWt19.-LAV -1 - 1149X"1,I A...,r_u 1-....:1 1.-. L-P-U111. Ul ; 0 ad III ill. L-•' 7 S into Av-J a 1 al ICC) I _ . into-MI - Av 1 •ii._m t3\0.• —war I'L- ....5 I shsair:°AvAv -5- H s 13. oi :'e, 11:8u.'' 1.47 . - 111-n7-117115 12 rP AV-1-1T7-11-1-1 iMi ::Sil'.rP ; 11 1 Biff IMI I . 6 ' ,,.,;‘,` 1111 150,,._ .17- ,,. „ __ _ . --H Mg , 45152 1002 r3.71,, Ln BaCiilt Av o. - g: Ut i I 0 m - BoogDesmet-Av:-1- e-Av- '- T r--117171Descriet AV P- - Pesm et Av cg Desrn t Av.. , , 6.1 I 16 111 pr"...,.. 1.---Tri do co me 2 el -1 il MI itT____ , 1-eto 7 r I' 'coalcio caraiAv Av ra ' Cat aldo Av EL 7, Comprehensive Plan Amendments 5 .-", _ sou.ii COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..aP °►NN�NG .. DIVISION 1247 , 45143.0282 1'143: I 4',Ui49ff,1 Dii . • .. _ Amendment Site _ - Nora Av I +" l__ —Di _ . 1 p45104.91524 II 45104.9145 45104.91756r. Q,` 45104.9145 4�11 45143:1343 ti ' 0451431304 f�`� .jill I • . 1.4 A a— 45104.9055 ~ `-�� 451049153 .- y1.Y-= _ s € a@I / as WL�a.11W _�---~ 1 45103:1502 i. _ = �01 {' r a t451049151 - =— � . 1 _ • , 1 , .i. ; ,., ..7 , ,,:. .ri • ., . __ I . , __ .. _ 4510 .4ZO<apt _ .., 45104.9150 1 A 45103.7501 U4Lig*. . , , , we 45151.4616 ` ,,z _ 45151,9090 451519031 1 m s I 45151-9621 A' I Comprehensive Plan Amendments 1 A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :71P ►NNI Isi7:' DIVISION CK . J CX __ __ _ _ _,_ CY --moommoillimp _, _, . I vv. _ ‘L-hE ..., Or ,, Niii .., „,„,,,, �. _ 'FYA o „.„„ --,,,,—.—.•,...,.... --_,,„:„ _ ate,..�ti ., I Ci.. t.„,) Comprehensive Plan Amendments 7 ne Sii>kaVal ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :ZPLNG DIVISION J I 1 L5C47.-, r j i� _2_L 9 Clik Mixed Use Center 510 .411 = _ `_` ----------_____1: .� k ..i{�r. f : ands tt4•i d ' ::>. 'f 1',+� 45:: 415$ L5104 C �`' fie Regional Commercial 45101 1E2 Ln 4$,i sok =16 0 P4I __,.____, - _ - -, __ _ -- ;_,- 1511.r _Mill'Aer • rr •c 1;1J:.- . . `j-`Fl Office a-'--..N- ,7 all ..--_,..-.4'il --e..li''. -)I--1.7 -"I_Pil - .--:::-71.5 _pp iI . r ~ �j e- 1"4 9755 _.---".4-,.., .....„. . - 4 °-1-::-.::---: ::',-- __sa l r: twil) I. -.1 c,--- ': L5104 =31 ` s High Density Res. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations 8 .:- . st: vaineiey ;, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..! PLANNING DIVISION % 11Mixed Use Center 4509 .0001 C:Xr 1 45105.0 20745104.91 i 4510 4.9158 CDC 1 1 r 15 4'a id1,: y Lil 1—i— �Y # '� 45104.9 0 M 7a , Regional Commercial e• c.r +40 pia Ink 1 \-?1_:.1) • itill . , , ,..„.„. _..........,..„;.„.... .---ja..u, . jor, ii, ,i...=.:0... ill._ .i..c...... ::, CX — • raora_Av_ it IP' Q Jp � a w 45103:1304 . a AlF. Office s, 5104.9055 45 <Apt ,..___..-7.. __....,.ipS':-.-;:-,..-. , -.....- 5103.0201-A I. 45103.0202 0 High Density Res.r6 1 µ c ti j N Lri Zoning District Designations 9 sP>kaiNi\'ffley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .'� PLANNING DIVISION City Initiated Map Amendment Project Number II CPA-2015-0002 Applicant: Patricia Abraham 1920 N Greenacres Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99016 Application Description Change parcels 45124.0203 and 45124.0151 from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use Center Comprehensive Plan Amendments 10 .so ww-kane COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : PLANNING .00.0valley DIVISION 'I .til nntg❑mer.y=Av rsil ..4.---sr-.<.---..--- Vicinity Map ji IE a____I0 � a F Shannon-Av cN}ansfield=Av 11 jAjLMl 0 1L so: D Indiana=Av I ndian:, Avi :11_,3J-1,,, Ba!dw�n=Ava r Amendment Site ; ^1 Uni, l Nora Av.I4 N ara-Av Nora-� @ 11__-- 1: n Tit 0. aa ro :r SPOK CLE �?�� I—— — � y.lci•a� 77– / 11 '1---1 -.z a=Mission=Av x3 - ir---r. � a 0 [ a e n S� Maxwell Av A p. Nr 1i� so uri r1 L U Iyi LI }r 0.�; Imo' at'a lit `�,al Boone:Av �r gpoore�Av ZJI < .,,,A Pelmet=Cf CI, a� HrL :: jii talr9n A❑ n ----1• a I rt sSrnadway_Av:==---11 —0 —, r a=Springfield=Av Comprehensive Plan Amendments 11 siiiikan valley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : PLANNING DIVISION 11-1f 0( , .., OC . , - - „.., ... , _ CY - _ i 1 Limy Mission Ave looking east Or z , Nil * I � - _ _ w � � . Intersection of Flora Rd and icIC w ;. w_- Mission Ave looking west. CL - _,,,. - ' ; -, -„,,,,„„ ......_ ,, . '4',,,,ei'7,v,,t-'' _ ..,_ ..c__,, ,to) . , LA.4 Comprehensive Plan Amendments ____ sp... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT P °►NN�NG .......milley DIVISION r G ! 55013 2103 { Aerial Map p 55073 2504 IN 45124.0145 =I _, � 5akdz..in Av '. L 55073.1353 ' 0 11+ vi •55473:1334 S - - + y' w . 451"24.0 14. 1 . R �. W. .. ,, _ X. n M1 040 ,,..,.• -.. t`r • 55073:1439 - m r' Hata..Aa ora Av 0 . 55073 1450. . r .. LIM +. 45124 0151 x5124.0138 1 1 y 45124 0140 Z. p' 0 , ,,,.;,'°' asi2a.o2o4 .* �� ti IN . . " Old 'Vl is si..:n,.„...v, vVl�ssion Pk _ - - •6. _ .. I7y p < it 10,113P4H-,- . 431MCEIN fl . , A106, .. :4:1_31.011i:1! Ay_ .. n i \ I ' _ py,_,,.., 55182.0813 `rpt Comprehensive Plan Amendments 13 uieTCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTy DIVISION —"%.'..',.,..1-604i Comprehensive Plan Map = 1 il 5503 2103 ` 55073.2144 1N ,------ ,__J__:s-a,,,,,.,_,,Av or as ri 0 _ . 55073.1353 � .lin I 55473.1344 Mil'� 55013.1345 3 POW 45124.0141 I n` 01Q "Milli CZ / 55073.1439 a �] LOI Nofa,Av vi 01a_Av I IS i ll 45124.01752 55073.1450 I45124.0150 - I`Nfli-'9 1114'11 411141' . I -n• _ __ 45124.0151 i + 45124 0138in, `.. w a 5Po 1/1116. 7.. i n ': , 45124.0140 Oyp'? a v. Mixed Use Center 14 45124.0204dl,,'L� 55073 3112 0 1-- — Missiorl_AV _. a Nr r,,,, %.,,„.0.• ,.. ,,,.„,,i, C k sa'u+ II irs r O 0 liklik 45131.0117 5] .. I n., [ .I][,1' - MMI � C" _AM1.axwell�Av_ ^ 45131 0116 - 45131.0117 Il r .11111 111 Maxwelb_Au 55182.0813 �I 11 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 14 ....".„ si.... COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT4, ,, DIVISION Zoning Map - -m. _ _ p73-11030 rsii 75124.0145N-3 mlit :=!: a w ns1111 u r----13aiiltivin Av w COC R-3 :3 55073.1353 via 6. 0m-.. ii 55 0/31344 m .. IME 45124imii( .0141 -!,14:Es. .. 55073.Y345 ail pV 55073.1439 a CDC i.m... . 4512x},0152 - - — _ — 5 v- 55073.1450-- 45124.0150 r-., in, 45124.0151 _ = •=:::m1 v 45124 0138 S P o% :: Le.,.amu d Likilia, 45124.0140 O"' p = 9 „v'-, CX 4.5124..0204 ��'° := L: 473,3 �.5YY2 0, II Missian_Av ::: _--- �old gAias nn R':' v m 4 — 71:11111111111 MUC 45131.0117 — —_ IlaPills — D 1 1 PAaxwel{Av_ ' 45131.0116 t::-... _Mil _ u,I 45131.0117 _-_- — = Maxwell`_Av_ � v ;k 55182.0013 —_--.. c 444 Comprehensive Plan Amendments 15