Agenda 01/22/2015 po ne
.000Valley®
Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda
City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
January 22, 2015 6:00 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 11, 2014 (these will be
mailed out next week.)
VI. COMMISSION REPORTS
VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda.
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS:
• Public Hearing - CPA-2015-0001, Comprehensive Plan Annual
amendment.
• Public Hearing - CPA-2015-0002, Comprehensive Plan Annual
amendment.
• Findings and Recommendations — STV-2014-0001, Street Vacation for
a portion of Old Mission Ave. at Mission Parkway.
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
XI. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Review
Meeting Date: January 22, 2015
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑old business ❑new business ®public hearing
❑information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Amendment — CPA-2015-
0001
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Planning Commission held a study session on January 8,
2015.
BACKGROUND:
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from
November 2nd to November 1st of the following year. Applications received prior to November
1st are considered by the Planning Commission in late winter/early spring of the following year,
with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer.
The Planning Commission will review the following Comprehensive Plan Amendments (CPAs)
and make a recommendation to City Council. City Council may choose to adopt the individual
amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the amendments, or
modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal, they must either
conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further
consideration.
CPA-2015-0001 is a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to
change the Comprehensive Plan designation from Office (0) with and Office (0) zoning
classification to a Community Commercial (C) Comprehensive Plan designation with a
Community Commercial (C) zoning classifications. If approved for a Comprehensive Plan
amendment, the site will automatically receive a zoning designation consistent with the new land
use designation.
NOTICE:
Notice for the proposed amendments will be placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald and the
site will be posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign no later than January 7, 2015, with a
description of the proposal. Individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners
within 400 feet of each amendment.
SEPA REVIEW
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) an environmental
checklist was required for the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under SEPA,
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are considered "non-project actions" defined as actions
involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or
modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the
physical development of the subject properties.
1 of 2
Staff reviewed the environmental checklist and a threshold determination was made for the
proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment. A Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was
issued for the proposed amendment consistent with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental
Ordinance on December 12, 2014.
STAFF CONTACT:
Christina Janssen, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1 —CPA-2015-0001 Staff Report
Exhibit 2 — Presentation — Note: A single presentation is provided for CPA-2015-0001 and
CPA-2015-0002.
2 of 2
COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Spokane
�; Tall STAFF REPORT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA-2015-0001
STAFF REPORT DATE: December 15,2014
HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: January 22,2015,beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall
Council Chambers,Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane
Valley,Washington 99206.
Project Number: CPA-2015-0001
Application The application is a privately initiated site-specific comprehensive plan map
Description: amendment requesting to change the designation from Office (0)with an
Office (0)zoning classification to a Community Commercial(C)designation
with a Community Commercial (C)zoning classification.
Location: Parcels 45104.9145, 45104.9146, 45104.9156 & 45104.9157 addressed as
13110, 13120& 13220 E.Nora Avenue; generally located 1300 feet west of the
intersection of Mamer Rd and Nora Avenue; further located in the SW 1/4 of the
SE I/4 of Section 10, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian,
Spokane County,Washington.
Applicant(s): Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagator,LLC
7607 W. Gratz Drive
Boise,ID 83709
Owner(s): Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagator,LLC
7607 W. Gratz Drive
Boise,ID 83709
Date of Application: October 29,2014
Date Determined October 29,2014
Complete:
Staff Contact: Christina Janssen,Planner
(509)720-5333
christina.j anssen@spokanevalley.org
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
Title 17 General Provisions,Title 19 Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 Environmental Controls.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2 Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 3: Zoning Map
Exhibit 4: Aerial Map
Staff Report CPA-2015-0001
A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Size and The site is approximately 3.22 acres in size. The northern most 2/3
Characteristics: of the site is generally flat and covered with natural vegetation.
South of this the site slopes upward at approximately 30%is
covered with mature evergreen trees and other vegetation.
Comprehensive Plan: Office (0)
Zoning: Office (0)
Existing Land Use: Three parcels are vacant and one parcel is being used for single
family residential.
2. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES:
North Comprehensive Plan—Regional Commercial (RC)
Zoning—Regional Commercial(RC)
Existing Land Uses—Nora Avenue,I-90 and Commercial
South Comprehensive Plan—High Density Residential (HDR)
Zoning—High Density Multifamily Residential district(MF-2)
Existing Land Uses—Multifamily dwelling units
East Comprehensive Plan—Office (0)
Zoning—Office (0)
Existing Land Uses—Commercial and Retail
West Comprehensive Plan—Office (0)
Zoning—Office (0)
Existing Land Uses—Single family residential and professional office.
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
1. Findings:
Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls),the lead agency has determined that this
proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The
Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on
December 12, 2014. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
2. Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21
have been fulfilled.
C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT
1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
a. Findings:
SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria
Page 2 of 7
Staff Report CPA-2015-0001
i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map
amendments if it finds that(analysis is italicized):
(1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare,and protection of the environment;
Analysis: The Community Commercial classification is intended to serve several
neighborhoods. The Comprehensive Plan states that Community Commercial areas
should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and should be located as business
clusters rather than arterial strip commercial development.
The amendment is consistent with the size requirement; the location's visibility along
the 1-90 corridor lends itself to regional services/business'. However, the access to
the area is limited and not conductive to regional development. The reclassification
may improve marketability of the property and the public health, safety, and general
welfare should be promoted by standards established by the City's development
regulations.
(2)The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A RCW
and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the comprehensive
land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and
evaluation by the City. The amendment provides a suitable land use designation
consistent with the City's GMA compliant Comprehensive Plan.
(3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the
property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Analysis: The location of I-90 adjacent to the site does not appear to be conducive
to residential development or office uses since the land has sat vacant. Residential
uses in the area have been converted to office or commercial uses while the
remaining residential uses appear to be on the decline. Other commercial uses
located in the area have been successful.
(4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
Analysis: The amendment does not correct a mapping error.
(5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Analysis: The amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan
amendments:
(1) The effect upon the physical environment;
Analysis: There are no known physical characteristics that could create difficulties
in developing the property under the proposed designation. This is a non project
action and future development will be evaluated for compliance with all
environmental requirements.
(2) The effect on open space, streams,rivers,and lakes;
Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as
wetlands, aquifer recharge areas,fish and wildlife habitat areas,frequently flooded
Page 3 of 7
Staff Report CPA-2015-0001
areas or geologically hazardous areas. The site is not located within the shoreline
jurisdiction and there are no known surface water quality or quantity issues.
The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods;
Analysis: The integration of commercial development on the south side of Interstate
90 should provide services for local economic demand and is consistent with other
businesses located in that corridor. The topography provides a natural barrier
between a commercial designation and the multi family development located
adjacent to the site at a significantly higher elevation. Development and
enforcement of the City's land use regulations will ensure compatibility with the
existing neighborhood.
The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities,roads,public
transportation,parks,recreation,and schools;
Analysis: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on
a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the
Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for
transportation, sewer, and water facilities. At the time of the submittal of any
building permit applications, an additional SEPA review may be required to evaluate
the impacts of the use(s) and proposed structure(s) on the physical environment in
regards to transportation. Currently the site is served with all utilities and improved
public roads.
(3) The benefit to the neighborhood,City, and region;
Analysis: The proposed site-specific map amendment should not affect the existing
character of the surrounding neighborhood and will likely promote the most
appropriate use of property. Commercial development of this property will support
the existing commercial uses in the area. Vacant property does not create a
population base necessary for businesses to thrive.
(4) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density
and the demand for such land;
Analysis: The land has sat vacant and it can be concluded that the property's
current land use designation does not meet the desirable market criteria for office
uses. The City has ample office designated land along the Argonne/Mullan, Pines,
and Evergreen Corridors available for development or redevelopment. The proposed
amendment should create a marketable piece of property that is more compatible
with uses located in the vicinity.
(5) The current and projected population density in the area; and
Analysis: The amendment will have no impact on population density and does not
demand population analysis.
(6) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Analysis: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have
minimal impact on other aspects of the plan.
2. Compliance with SVMC Title 19 Zoning Regulations
a. Findings:
Page 4 of 7
Staff Report CPA-2015-0001
The proposed privately initiated site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment is
requesting to change the designation from Office (0) with an Office (0)zoning classification
to Community Commercial (C) designation with a Community Commercial (C) zoning
classification.
The Community Commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office
establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas
should not be larger than 15 to 17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters
rather than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be
designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan
amendments or through subarea planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or
multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure
compatibility.
Pursuant to SVMC 19.30.030 (B) all site specific zoning map amendments must meet all the
following criteria:
a. The requirements of SVMC 22.20,Concurrency;
As stated in previous analysis, future development of the site will be required to meet the
concurrency standards at the time of building permit issuance.
b. The requested map is consistent with the Comprehensive plan;
As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan.
c. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and
welfare;
As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the
public health, safety and welfare.
d. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan or because of a need for additional property in the proposed
zoning district classification, or because the proposed zoning classification is
appropriate for reasonable development of the subject property;
The proposed amendment and zone change is reasonable for the development of the property.
e. The property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include corner touches and
property located across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or higher
zoning classification;
The property located north of the subject property has a Regional Commercial land use
designation in the Comprehensive Plan and a Regional Commercial zoning designation. The
subject property is adjacent to these properties over Nora Avenue and Interstate 90, both
public rights-of-way. The subject property meets the requirement.
The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the immediate
vicinity of the subject property;
The surrounding land uses include multifamily residential, retail and office uses. The
existing land uses are compatible with the proposed land use designation and zoning district.
f. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole;
The amendment will provide an opportunity to redevelop a property that is currently vacant
with little chance of redevelopment as currently zoned. The Community Commercial
Page 5 of 7
Staff Report CPA-2015-0001
designation would allow for a wider variety of commercial development with prime freeway
exposure.
b. Conclusion(s):
Pursuant to RCW 36.70a.130(2)(a), proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan will be
processed only once a year except for the adoption of original subarea plans, amendments to
the shoreline master program, the amendment of the capital facilities chapter concurrent with
the adoption of the City budget, in the event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the
Comprehensive Plan filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board.
The proposed amendment is consistent SVMC Title 19 and state law regarding
Comprehensive Plan amendments.
3. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
a. Findings:
The community commercial classification designates areas for retail, service and office
establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Community Commercial areas
should not be larger than 15-17 acres in size and should be located as business clusters rather
than arterial strip commercial development. Community Commercial centers may be
designated through the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan
amendments or through sub-area planning. Residences in conjunction with business and/or
multifamily developments may be allowed with performance standards that ensure
compatibility. In addition, light assembly or other unobtrusive uses not traditionally located in
commercial zones may be allowed with appropriate performance standards to ensure
compatibility with surrounding uses or zoning districts.
The proposed site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment will provide additional
development opportunities in an area with good visibility and which has been unable to
prosper under the current zoning designation.
The proposed site-specific Comprehensive Plan map amendment is generally consistent with
the following Comprehensive Plan goals and policies.
Goal LUG-4: Transform various commercial business areas into vital, attractive, easily
accessible mixed use areas that appeal to investors, consumers and residents and enhance the
community image and economic vitality.
Goal EDG-1: Encourage diverse and mutually supportive business development and the
expansion and retention of existing businesses within the City for the purpose of emphasizing
economic vitality, stability and sustainability.
Goal EDG-2:Encourage redevelopment of commercial/industrial properties within the City.
b. Conclusion(s): The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's Adopted
Comprehensive Plan.
4. Adequate Public Facilities
a. Findings:
The Growth Management Act (GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan require that public
facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is
available for occupancy.
Page 6 of 7
Staff Report CPA-2015-0001
The amendment is currently served with both public water and sewer. Nora Avenue and
Mamer Road, both local access streets,provide roadway access and tie into Mission Avenue
to the south and Pines Road to the west. Pines Road is a designated state roadway and
Mission Avenue is a minor arterial road according to Map 3.1 of the City's adopted Arterial
Street Plan. Spokane County Fire District No. 1 will provide fire protection service, the City
of Spokane Valley Police Department will provide police service and Spokane Transit
Authority (STA)will provide public transit service.
b. Conclusion(s):
The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development.
D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Findings:
Staff has not received any public comments to date.
2. Conclusion(s):
No concerns are noted.
E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS
1. Findings:
Staff has not received any agency comments to date.
2. Conclusion(s):
No concerns are noted.
Page 7 of 7
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Review
Meeting Date: January 22, 2015
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑old business ❑new business ®public hearing
❑information ❑admin.report ❑pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing Comprehensive Plan Amendment — CPA-2015-
0002
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Planning Commission held a study session January 8, 2015.
BACKGROUND:
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from
November 1st to October 31st of the following year. Applications received prior to November 1St
are considered by the Planning Commission in late winter/early spring of the following year,
with a decision by City Council in late spring/early summer.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
(CPA) and provide findings and a recommendation to City Council. City Council may choose to
adopt the individual amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission, disapprove the
amendments, or modify and adopt the proposal. If the Council chooses to modify a proposal,
they must either conduct a public hearing or refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission
for further consideration.
CPA-2015-0002 is a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan map amendment requesting to
change the Comprehensive Plan land use designation from Low Density Residential (LDR) with
a Single-family Residential (R-3) zoning classification to a Mixed Use Center (MUC) land use
designation with a Mixed Use Center (MUC) zoning classification. If approved, the site will
receive a zoning designation consistent with the new land use designation. Staff has updated the
staff report with additional information and analysis pertaining to the Spokane Transit Authority
bus service to the area. Information and analysis was also added pertaining to the residential
development in the area and the traffic impacts of that development on the Mission Ave / Flora
Road intersection.
NOTICE:
Notice for the Public Hearing was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald and the site was
posted with a "Notice of Public Hearing" sign, containing a description of the proposal on
January 7, 2015. Individual notice was mailed to property owners within 400 feet of the site.
SEPA REVIEW
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21C) an environmental
checklist was completed for the proposed amendment. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
are considered "non-project actions" defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or
programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional
environmental review may be required for the physical development of the subject properties.
1 of 2
Staff reviewed the environmental checklist and a threshold determination was made for the
proposal. A Determination of Non-significance (DNS) was issued for the proposed amendment
consistent with the SVMC Title 21 —Environmental Controls.
STAFF CONTACT:
Martin Palaniuk, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1 —CPA-2015-0002 Staff Report
Exhibit 2—Presentation
2 of 2
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Spokane
�; Tall STAFF REPORT TO THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
CPA-2015-0002
STAFF REPORT DATE: December 31,2014
HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: January 22,2015,beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall
Council Chambers,Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane
Valley,Washington 99206.
Project Number: CPA-2015-0002
Application Description: The application is a privately initiated, site-specific Comprehensive
Plan map amendment seeking to change the Comprehensive Plan land
use designation from Low Density Residential(LDR)with a Single-
Family Residential(R-3)zoning classification to a Mixed Use Center
(MUC)designation with a Mixed Use Center(MUC)zoning
classification.
Location: 1603 N Flora Rd,Parcel No.45124.0203, and 1625 N Flora Rd,Parcel
No.45124.0151; generally located on the northwest corner of Mission
Avenue and Flora Road; further located in the SE 1/4 of Section 12,
Township 25 North,Range 44 East,Willamette Meridian, Spokane
County,Washington.
Applicant(s): Patricia Abraham
1920 N Greenacres Rd,
Spokane Valley,WA 99216
Owner(s): Donald L Fisher Jayn Courchaine
1603 N Flora Rd 619 N Sargent Rd
Spokane Valley,WA 99016 Spokane Valley,WA 99212
Date of Application: October 27,2014
Date Determined Complete November 1,2014
Staff Contact: Martin Palaniuk,Planner, (509) 720-5031,
Lapalaniuk@spokanevalley.org
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan, Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
Title 17 General Provisions,Title 19 Zoning Regulations, and Title 21 Environmental Controls.
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2 Comprehensive Plan Map
Exhibit 3: Zoning Map
Exhibit 4: Aerial Map
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
1. PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Size and Combined,both parcels equal approximately 3.56 acres. The site is
Characteristics: relatively flat with residential landscaping including trees and
bushes. A round-about intersection is situated on the southeast
corner of the site and is set at an elevation above the site.
Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Residential(LDR)
Zoning: Single-Family Residential District(R-3)
Existing Land Use: Single-family residential use on both parcels.Mission Avenue
runs east/west along the southern boundary and is also set at a
higher elevation than the site. Flora Road runs north/south along
the west boundary and drops in elevation from the round-about to
ground level with the site.
2. SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN,ZONING,AND LAND USES:
North Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential(LDR)
Zoning—Single-Family Residential District(R-3) and Single-family Residential
Urban District(R-4)
Existing Land Uses—Single-family residential
South Comprehensive Plan—Mixed Use Center(MUC)
Zoning—Mixed Use Center(MUC)
Existing Land Uses—Currently vacant.
East Comprehensive Plan—Low Density Residential(LDR)
Zoning—Single-family Residential Urban District(R-4)
Existing Land Uses—Single-family Residential
West Comprehensive Plan—Mixed Use Center(MUC)
Zoning—Mixed Use Center(MUC)
Existing Land Uses—Greenhouses and high density multi-family apartments
B. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
1. Findings:
Pursuant to SVMC Title 21 (Environmental Controls),the lead agency has determined that this
proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The
Planning Division issued a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal on
December 12, 2014. The determination was made after review of a completed environmental
checklist, the application, Spokane Valley Municipal Code Titles 19, 21, and 22, a site
assessment, and public and agency comments, and other information on file with the lead
agency.
2. Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and SVMC Title 21
have been fulfilled.
Page 2 of 9
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
C. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
AMENDMENT
1. Compliance with Title 17(General Provisions) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
a. Findings:
SVMC 17.80.140(H). Comprehensive Plan Amendment Approval Criteria
i. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan amendments and area-wide zone map
amendments if it finds that:
(1) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety,
welfare,and protection of the environment;
Analysis: The Mixed Use Center (MUC) designation is more appropriate to the
transportation facilities located along the boundaries of the site. The new
designation will allow uses more consistent with those occurring west and south of
the site and with the roadways that intersect at the southeast corner of the site.
Mission Avenue and Flora Road intersect in a round-about at the southwest corner of
the property. Mission Avenue is identified in the City of Spokane Valley Arterial
Street Plan as a proposed minor arterial. Flora Road is identified as a proposed
minor arterial south of the intersection and as a collector north of the intersection.
This is in anticipation of the increased amount of traffic.
The Comprehensive plan states the minor arterial street system interconnects with
and augments the principal arterial system. It accommodates trips of moderate
length at a lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. Minor arterials
place more emphasis on land access than the principal arterial. Minor arterials may
carry local bus routes and provide intra-community continuity, but ideally does not
penetrate identifiable neighborhoods.
Collector Streets provide both land access and traffic circulation within residential
neighborhoods and commercial and industrial areas. It differs from the arterial
system in that facilities from the collector system may penetrate residential
neighborhoods, distributing trips from arterials through the area to their ultimate
destinations. Conversely, the collector system collects traffic from the local streets in
residential neighborhoods and channels it into the arterial system.
Traffic information provided by the Senior Traffic Engineer indicates 4,600 vehicle
trips pass through the intersection on a daily basis. Estimates for the year 2040
indicate the traffic volume will roughly triple.
Higher densities are encouraged along transit corridors. The Mixed-use Center
designation would allow for two or more different land uses within a development.
Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally mixed, and could
include uses such as office, retail and/or lodging along higher density residential
uses.
The existing minor arterial roadways combined with the high density residential
development that has occurred west of the site combine to make the amendment
consistent with the long-term objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole.
The nearest Spokane Transit Authority (STA) bus route is located approximately 1
mile east, west and south of the site. STA generally considers three metrics for public
transit service:
Page 3 of 9
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
i. Within 1/4 mile of a bus stop is near. This is generally a five-minute walk for
most people. Studies point to this as the ideal walking distance.
ii. Within 1/2 mile of a bus stop is within walking distance. This is nearing the
cut-off distance most people will walk to transit (though some will walk
farther). STA Level of Service policy requires that 80% of the urban
population should have basic service (fixed routes that run all/most days for
most hours)within 1/2 mile distance.
iii. Within 3/4 mile is the federal access area. For persons whose disabilities
prevent them using or accessing a bus, STA is required to provide service so
long as their origin and destination is within 3/4 mile of an established bus
route.
STA has identified this location for future bus service within their STA Moving
Forward Plan and Connect Spokane, their comprehensive plan.
The public health, safety, and general welfare should be promoted by standards
established by the state and the City's regulations.
(2) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of Chapter 36.70A
RCW and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment;
Analysis: The Growth Management Act (GMA) stipulates that the comprehensive
land use plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and
evaluation by the City. The amendment provides a suitable land use designation
consistent with the City's GMA compliant Comprehensive Plan.
(3) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the
property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies;
Analysis: Significant changes have occurred in the area of the proposed
amendment. A 324-unit apartment complex has been constructed along Indiana
Avenue and Mission Avenue less than 1/4 of a mile west of the site. The complex
consists of a mix of buildings with either 24 dwelling units or 12 dwelling units and a
clubhouse. Single-family and duplex subdivisions that have occurred within a 1/2-
mile radius of the site since 2005 include the Hidden Valley, Valley Coach Estate,
Flora Ridge, Flora Estates, Flora Meadows, Flora Springs, and Centennial Place
subdivisions. All together the subdivisions added 273 single-family dwellings to the
area. When combined with the multi family development a total of 597 dwelling
units have been added to the area since 2005.
The increased residential density has contributed to the higher traffic volumes
experienced at the Mission/Flora road intersection.
The amendment is a reasonable extension of the existing Mixed Use Center
designation located adjacent to the west and south of the site based on the changed
conditions.
(4) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or
Analysis: The amendment does not correct a mapping error.
(5) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive
Plan.
Analysis: The amendment does not address an identified deficiency in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Page 4 of 9
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
ii. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan
amendments:
(1) The effect upon the physical environment;
Analysis: There are no known physical characteristics that could create difficulties
in developing the property under the proposed designation. This is a non project
action and future development will be evaluated for compliance with all
environmental requirements.
(2) The effect on open space, streams,rivers,and lakes;
Analysis: There are no known critical areas associated with the site, such as
wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, frequently flooded areas or geologically
hazardous areas. The site is not located within the shoreline jurisdiction and there
are no known surface water quality or quantity issues.
(3) The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding
neighborhoods;
Analysis: Development and enforcement of the City's land use regulations will
ensure compatibility with the existing residential neighborhood. The use of fencing
and screening will provide visual separation and physical buffers between land uses.
New multifamily development is required to meet a 1:1 height to setback ratio when
abutting a single family use or zone and a 10 foot minimum setback. New
commercial development must meet 20 foot setbacks when adjacent to a residential
use or zone. In addition, Type 1 screening is required for commercial development
adjacent to any residential zone. Allowed uses within the MUC zone are considered
compatible with the adjacent MUC zoning and will not impose impacts.
(4) The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities,roads,public
transportation,parks,recreation, and schools;
Analysis: The City of Spokane Valley addresses adequacy of community facilities on
a citywide basis through capital facilities planning. Policy CFP-9.1 of the
Comprehensive Plan recommends a concurrency management system for
transportation, sewer, and water facilities. At the time of development, an additional
SEPA review may be required to evaluate the impacts of the use(s) and proposed
structure(s)on the physical environment and transportation.
(5) The benefit to the neighborhood,City, and region;
Analysis: The proposed site-specific map amendment may have significant benefit to
the area by creating opportunity for small scale commercial development to serve the
neighborhood and the 597 new dwelling units in the area. The site is located at the
intersection of two minor arterial roadways. Minor arterials serve to disperse and
collect traffic to and from neighborhoods. Mixed use development would serve the
multi family and single-family residential development occurring in the area and
would be ideally located at the intersection of two arterial roadways.
Low Density Residential land use implemented through the Single-family Residential
(R-3) district and the Single-family Residential Urban zoning(R-4) district is located
north, east and southeast of the site. The R-3 zoning district permits single-family
and duplex dwelling development. The R-4 zoning district permits a variety of
residential uses to include single family, duplex, multi family, and townhouse
dwelling development. Both zones permit Manufactured Home Park development.
Public, quasi public, and communication uses such as utility facilities and cell towers
Page 5 of 9
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
are permitted under certain conditions. Commercial development is not permitted or
is severely limited in both zones.
Mixed Use Center land use implemented through the Mixed Use Center(MUC)Zone
is located west and south of the site. As stated previously, 324 dwelling units have
been added to area from multi family residential development west of the site. The
nearest commercial centers are the Spokane Valley Mall area and the large regional
commercial box stores located across Interstate 90 along Broadway Avenue and
Sullivan Road. The MUC zone provides an opportunity for commercial or mixed use
development that could serve the residential neighborhoods in the vicinity.
(6) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density
and the demand for such land;
Analysis: As shown in Figure 2.1 of the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan, 3.5%
of the land in the City is designated for Mixed-use Center. The Mixed-use Center
designation would allow for two or more different land uses within developments
under this designation. Mixed-use developments can be either vertical or horizontally
mixed, and would include employment uses such as office, retail and/or lodging
along with higher density residential uses, and in some cases community or cultural
facilities. Compatibility between uses is achieved through design which integrates
certain physical and functional features such as transportation systems, pedestrian
ways, open areas or court yards, and common focal points or amenities.
(7) The current and projected population density in the area; and
Analysis: The amendment will have marginal impact on population density and does
not demand population analysis since the increase in density is isolated to 3.5 acres.
(8) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan.
Analysis: The amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and will have
minimal impact on other aspects of the plan.
2. Compliance with SVMC Title 19 Zoning Regulations
a. Findings:
The proposal is to change the comprehensive plan designation from Low Density Residential
(LDR) with a Single-Family Residential (R-3) zoning classification to Mixed-use Center
(MUC) designation with a Mixed-use Center(MUC)zoning classification.
Future development on the site will be subject to the provisions in SVMC 19.110.
Pursuant to SVMC 19.30.030 (B) all site specific zoning map amendments must meet all the
following criteria:
a. The requirements of SVMC 22.20,Concurrency;
Spokane County Utilities provides sewer throughout the City of Spokane Valley.
Specific sewer requirements would be addressed at the time of development however
sewer facilities exist in the area and are available to the site. Consolidated Irrigation
District #19 is the water purveyor for this area. Water requirements will be
coordinated with the water district at the time development is proposed. As discussed
previously, the site is situated at the corner of two minor arterial roadways and is well
served by the transportation system. The proposed amendment meets concurrency
requirements.
b. The requested map is consistent with the Comprehensive plan;
Page 6 of 9
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
c. The map amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and
welfare;
As stated in previous analysis the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to
the public health, safety and welfare.
d. The map amendment is warranted in order to achieve consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan or because of a need for additional property in the proposed
zoning district classification, or because the proposed zoning classification is
appropriate for reasonable development of the subject property;
The recent single-family and multi family residential development that has occurred
all around the site have changed the character of this area. The improvements made
to Mission Avenue west of the site and the construction of the round-about at the
intersection of Mission Avenue and Flora Road combine to make the site appropriate
for mixed use development.
e. The property is adjacent and contiguous (which shall include corner touches and
property located across a public right-of-way) to property of the same or higher
zoning classification;
The properties located west and south of the subject property have a Mixed-Use
Center land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan and a Mixed-Use Center
zoning designation. The subject property meets the requirement.
f. The map amendment will not be materially detrimental to uses or property in the
immediate vicinity of the subject property;
The site is surrounded by a mix of high density multi family use and higher density
single-family uses. A commercial green house is located adjacent to the site along its
western boundary. Existing land uses are compatible, or will be made compatible,
with the application of development regulations at the time of development.-
g. The map amendment has merit and value for the community as a whole;
The amendment will allow mixed-use, commercial, or high density residential
development of property ideally located at the intersection of two minor arterials.
b. Conclusion(s):
Pursuant to RCW 36.70a.130(2)(a), proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan will be
processed only once a year except for the adoption of original subarea plans, amendments to
the shoreline master program,the amendment of the capital facilities chapter concurrent with
the adoption of the City budget, in the event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the
Comprehensive Plan filed with the Growth Management Hearings Board.
The proposed amendment is consistent SVMC Title 19 and state law regarding
Comprehensive Plan amendments.
3. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
a. Findings:
The Mixed Use Center (MUC) designation provides for mixed use development consistent
with the development that is occurring on adjacent properties. It will provide an opportunity
to develop uses that will serve surrounding residential uses.
The proposed amendment is compatible with the Mixed Use Center west and south of the site
and single-family residential urban use located north and east of the site.
Page 7 of 9
Staff Report&Findings CPA-2015-0002
The amendment is generally consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan goals and
policies.
Goal LUG-2 Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with
the community's needs and preferences.
Goal LUG-5 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's
neighborhoods.
Goal LUG-9 Encourage the development of Mixed-use areas that foster community identity
and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit.
Goal HG-1 Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the
community and region.
Goal EDG-7 Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,
predictability and clear direction.
Goal NG-3 Encourage neighborhood/sub-area planning for commercial, industrial and
mixed use properties to enhance the quality, vibrancy and character of existing development.
b. Conclusion(s):
The proposed amendment is consistent with the City's Adopted Comprehensive Plan.
4. Adequate Public Facilities
a. Findings:
The Growth Management Act(GMA) and the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that public
facilities and services be adequate to serve the development at the time the development is
available for occupancy.
The amendment is currently served with public water and sewer. Mission Avenue and Flora
Road will provide transportation access. As previously stated both roads are classified as
minor arterials according to Map 3.1 of the City's adopted Arterial Street Plan. Spokane
County Fire District No. 1 will provide fire protection service, the City of Spokane Valley
Police Department will provide police service and Spokane Transit Authority (STA) will
provide public transit service.
b. Conclusion(s):
The proposed amendment will have adequate urban services at the time of development.
D. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO PUBLIC COMMENTS
1. Findings:
Staff has not received any public comments to date.
2. Conclusion(s):
No concerns are noted.
E. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO AGENCY COMMENTS
1. Findings:
Staff has not received any agency comments to date.
2. Conclusion(s):
No concerns are noted.
Page 8 of 9
��� COMMUNITYand ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -I"- PLANNING'
DIVISION
Planning Commission Public Hearing
January 22, 2015
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
File No. CPA-2015-0001
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
ka e`~ COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P�►NNIN
Walley ;'' DIVISION
Comprehensive Planning
The Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP)
is the City's guide for growth and development.
Infrastructure
• Residential
• Industrial • Buildings
• Roads
• Commercial • Services
• Office • Sewer • Financing
• Water
• Recreation
• Utilities
Land Use
,_ Capital
Facilities
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 2
Illw-
aka"e COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT P�►NNING
alley DIVISION
SVCP Amendment Process
• City Council approves official docket
Docket • November 1st cut off for applications (60-day notice)
• Planning Commission recommendation
Legislative • City Council approval
• Growth Management Hearing Board
Appeals
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 3
aka"e COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNIN
alley DIVISION
PrivatelyInitiated MapAmendment
Project Number I CPA-2015-0001;
Applicant. Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagator LLC
7607 W. Gratz Drive
Boise, ID 83709
Applicants Stanley M. Schwartz
Representative: Witherspoon Kelley
422 W. Riverside Avenue Suite #100
Spokane, WA 99201
Application Description Request to change parcels 45104.9145, 45104.9146,
45104.9156 & 45104.9157 from Office to Community
Commercial
.... o2 -Ill
Spokane ,.
.....ONalley. COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT _._ PlitNNING -- -,
DIVISION
. i
Jo, , ra.a.„-b „
----..._909s
45115.;04534115---------9°4°
- --
,----, ---_
lb A V ' 4. 45105.9068 -__
e,',` o
. . :7D`
till
7 45095.9062 -1....
,b a S
1:D°. ' r3 rm 45105.91.33 451/59033
' _cii 45103,021i 45103,G259 1
0 i 111 H •
anslipid Aq,. f
,., I __Jr:: , __ ManIfield Av 44,,...._ )....„?--------
-'i -- ----,---1: --:---:_------= - , 451119025
---"' 45104.9132 .,---- ,---
IOC ' --
45094.6001 J15103,0215 1.
--____—
__
I 4S094 0581 11 g' .,_ Tian
I a Av —_-
45116.9070 Um li .','- 45115.0303
----_____ CPA-2015-0001 i• 11 --,-.rp-' -
,....
-,_ 1 11111111111111111 --L-------L ii ' i i /i 1 ii i i'v.J
i__L-I------
___ --"firiiir
-- -
=----------__ Npe 1- "' y.? VI.''' N........3".
.1.'
xml illor-it, T No„, Ay, . .
L,a
. .
___..
SPOKANE VAL-LEY
C
NOra Av 45.113,9022
-- 45104.9150.--,,--411■61, •.
es/ ,., a.• ----- .....di VW 1 - -- -
- ion Av-- - - ....-
I I 1----u• . ---- _.-- 7, 45142.9128
;--F1 -7177 Ill
Jo. m
...ir,.,
... ,
Santo
< , 1—!--fl IMiiiti r _____.• ,..,,„ Ay „ . „, t . ,•
__ ,..... ,
t
•
r‘ • e, . ._
CL 5 into A v
75-
.
U .2- ... rm° mm ,)"1-`-°\ sharp Av s771 - Sharp Av ,7„
L.
i-i Boone Av o. XI
IJL .0.?..e Av_ _ ,. , , , , , [TT ri IF,
--,.. 0- 4515t1002
J_
.a. Boone Av
,:. L-LrH i r'i IL u, o.
p, <
--qui 1 ilfEF-3 et A v , 7 2:
De sm e t Av,:.,'.
.,--1 i -a
-. im
Desm et Av -.d .1-
" 0.: Desm et Av !rine--t-n— -111. '
..- _. ro Catalcio Av ! 'Cataltio Av 7c451.55 1104 i g al
C ataido Av 0- 7J-
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 5
aka"e`~ COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
valley DIVISION
i 'I',t04 y�r61 45104.9012 '"
Z �n
oc
- - Amendment Site -
1,°) _- --
3 -,__ _-.. _.- ____ -_ "- - __ - - - .�_
Nora A�
r
ay..-.. P,9• 45104.9152
45104.4145 I 45104.9056 y `f IT
45104.9145
45103:1303
45103:1304 i
ti _
7
jh / _ 951[14.9055
, /J - _ 45104 9153
�f__ Y 4s10a.asDa -
CDC 45I04.9151 —
4 y e4110
s' 3r
45103.0202 __
<IPIIr .1 - 45104.9150 -• -- `
45103.1501 I -
• Jl
r l
Me ," ) • r
tliM . 1: -
Mission-Ay � �_ L°
b
45151 9021
45151.9016 45151.9030` !
45151-9031 m
rti. ' A
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 6
SOkar°1.;\'
COMMUNITYand ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
valley sDIVISION
t
CDC
CDC _ • ..... ..,
or
_ ,......,0* _ , .
-
1 _e
in
rill
r,F qty V ''.. 1 •. ylz"'
00
3,J' S
a* trl gip. a
fiNit
icirli i
? Pi-." -t i s at!
elle
ira
Comprehensive Plan Amendments
sookankCOMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING w
.� . DIVISION
‘ II° �� 50r?0Q1_—
NMI IIII
�
(DC
.31_
Mixed Use Center
�51-01_:51111:111:5:104
s
Cr r1CDC L5104.;15: LY.
Regional Commercial 1510 .916:
1
IA/ It 1 i 1 eziols., —NI amit—ii p
F
licP
CC
IN - wr ..-7- -------
110 -F
- - ,..- - Fr,- e- . .-.:.?1'. Ar.di _alf le 7-7-.-----
_ Ai
114CX .- . - ,g. f 4104-`116 Office � �
„--_,V,4
6Mei 1 a r-r :e: . ,_ c* .i.„...„:.->ff 1
f510 .=0gr r s-- ..-4./.-- .,:j,,,t _ t-, A IIf
Uk
--"--':-..:";-:::;W •= 7.::.,.--';11,...-.. ..
• .,......7.
0 _ 4 .-' _e:_,,,
7,04 C
High Density Res. R
Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designations 8
kane COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
� ualky- DIVISION
_ _
... • .
45097.0001
Xlia — __ Mixed Use Center
4 45105.0 207
45104.91
liZC
�' 45104.9158 —
CDC - f'70, . 4 /04.9.159 45104.9
0111° li t es Regional Commercial
�, 1 Iii
Nora Av0
45104.9146 p "�
w 45103:1304 , – ;3 T w
Office f 5104.9055
0,41.4) .--7,,,,- ,,,,,_-_____.---.), ,
MIMI 5.1030201-4 F X45103.0202 - , High Density Res.
--.. IA U.•
Zoning District Designations 9
€1evCOMMUNITYand ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PANNINDIVISION
Questions ?
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 10
��� COMMUNITYand ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT -I"- PLANNING'
DIVISION
Planning Commission Public Hearing
January 22, 2015
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
File No. CPA-2015-0002
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 11
COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT . PIANNIN
alley DIVISION
City Initiated Map Amendment
Project Number II CPA-2015-0002
Applicant: Patricia Abraham
1920 N Greenacres Rd
Spokane Valley, WA 99016
Application Description Change parcels 45124.0203 and 45124.0151 from
Low Density Residential to Mixed Use Center
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 12
COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT LA
PNNING
� ua11e3'' DIVISION
'.:i ni`r„mery=Av 1,
Vicinity Map 44 �p,
-,f Pl3 Av 0 Mid nnon-Ay
• II ich keU i'Av
0Cy
, I`—
I � Indiana=Av�r
Tn
Ralr:•cin Av,a o,
i P
Amendment Site
n
�lNyra_Av r�Nara=Av iNtira-Ln ars n
y114 ^. c I.d
IILMII a �v I n
r SPOT( V LLEA' s -jI—_— —
`•p.Qt J ..5:'
5� M lssian=Av � �
0.
0 �•
e 1�
Maxwell AY
' �
S
Ni , '''';Tr
T .:,
, ,
l''''-
lb
[
«.
(,,,„
Rnane:Aum- .--,6nane Av
1pesmet=Ct v _
J m
U ,
Deset Av
�.141
9C.'
A
. ca taldo Av
Cataldo Av
o
Rinaclway=Av� Iy
—v, —„ 1 =S
, ypringfield=Av
ar.,adwav=Av
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 13
Siioka<\"---,leyCOMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING
DIVISION
. -
Mission Ave looking east
'I'll Amendment Site
0# Multi-family development
C:111)1
/ 1 Greenhouse
i/ . , '
0 ,'
' ,
mom.. .
~ 0
, ® ate''-"¢ '-' a::
s .:. . "w- " - 'I _
-. fl ;• If rf, r ..`I ..i} Y �.... -, -�E.', - - - . - "
1-11 Minor Arterial Roadways — Y t''+i.,
Vacant Land Zoned MUCCDC Mission Ave/Flora Rd
11141
e. fl ,
litAi .,s. ., ,
to) , , .
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 14
aka"e`~ COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
valley DIVISION
‘111 Augusta Ct looking west at the site
CX _
CDC Amendment Site '
(DO
, I/
0( :4.1.1'
-_ 1 I P
NI __-- .__ ___ _ _____
f ___7,lc .
CL .,,....„.- - • -- - ,-..i. _-- , , '''' , , ."...: ..0 '1h-al
CM) ' - Il.v
AILILI
;rtl
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 15
COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT T PLANNING x
� ualiey- DIVISION
eliMap I . _ j 55073 2.3
Aerial Ma 45124.0145 �m ) 1�_„ I 5507.2104 `4
1 W �
. _ _
_ ___ __
I.., , IR AV 1
:..
. .
..,. , ... .
-I55073.1353
I:: .
i .__..--,- --vat,.- a ' �^ i 550731344 L.
• " 1 . 5 5 0 73 3345.. S..° '-Itii=) _____„..4 , bf
45124 0141 �{
55073:1439 _ `. . ��a';
7 Nara ly.v 3,
X55073.1450
II7f'
I - . 45124 0155 a fa-
! 45124 0151. a
45l24.0138 1• €
liti J ° 3 Gp OO G n rn r� Ni. n�;
45124 0140 - !�! ..o� az:I '
0 ,.„._7: , _,-. ;1- 45124 0204
1f ,Or. a {v
��(NI . Missi c+n Av
Qld Gli on�Av vlession Pit
p'v�' i f`'k n
raCtak, -.. .,...; ni.„_.Y
a
F Wlaswel1 An
451310116.-.1 . . zi/
u .- '''' 1 , eilaigragg . ..
Maxwell Av
y
sem„_ r �1an,a.„. 55182.0813
MIIII
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 16
COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELI�PMENT PLANNING
DIVISION
Comprehensive Plan Map N a
s 55073 2103 ,
NI. w
w 55a7a.21a4�
ii
0 55873.1353
55073.1344
/ ---- i ill IME
irimuj_____HL-t,,,i_,IAli
55073.1345 is
i 45124.0141 pA CD
----Ili___ 55073.1439'wPlrr a..RVWOW
v
r- i
5124.0152.
55073.1450 �11
I45124 0150
Vali.7 iprn Sp,kce v. • - NIN
fUPI 45124.0138 45124.0151 'm1 - -
B N
r.111 45124.0140 SPQ gtiU a i
n'
0 Mixed Use Center iiiT-
I 45124020a Aye IL------55°
503311211
Missian_Av
NI "II ri .:?..,-
...,„
i
ii
45131 0117
5 Ell
PI iArel 4k 7,111,1 p/ldxwellAv_mIII1
45131.0116 45131.0117
Lie �Mazwell_Rv
p k 55182.0813 N (�
tpl\
}nc``'n ._._._._. Irl
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 17
Silaane PMUNITY ECONOMIC DE1EL P ENT ANNING
DIVISION
uescnu.<�ti..--r-= �
-.45124.05.6'4
!Sioning Map � _ - - �,v. 55571.2103 ,
i� 45124.0145 R-3 � ',: .... "'' o
55973.2504
w 111
S-7---_-.$al_dwim Av m
O -3 - - - 55073.1353
°a 6. :: 55573.1344
--::.�'" 55073]345 yI NM
CI45124.0141 1° ^i
0 -
�0. 55073.1439 a
- - - _- ?
MP T3 IIV_R-4 - tam.
_ 45124.0152
I _ _ _ _ - - ::: 55073 1450
ilEn 45124 0150 mi
I.11\ -
45124.0151 az
45124 0138 4411 __1
SPO , -UP
2:1 ii
UM 4
O
45124.0140 otia�' �, El-
45124.0204 agy1' 55�,83112__
0
��Mi3shom_Av
All
[}hd NhisfonAv A4 n Pk m
1 :',- R-
45131.0117 - -=
�1f1 _ NIU[' n1
� _ PllaxwellAv_
Lie
451310116 45131 0117 1 .•
— IUn1
l
AM1axivell_Av_
r f
+k 55182 0813 -:: - C�
5nd�ana P :..i 1 Y
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 18
kar COMMUNITY and ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
valley DIVISION
':
14:-.' '
II.
.r rte_. .
=fin- f �` .
Olt ._ ,
0
• Et p is }q
hi Ft+
a �' x a
:.
Ullli
0( . ---- 4
"II t„
I, el _
_ at
_ _ ilis_r_ s
1, — A1
d '�,, _
' - _ - r
............ r. ,
-Aim mlimIMMI MINN
-r--��r:11 ,rfny
Ian 4141144:-..,.-4.'
Cy s
it la Ili ingillise. •
IC.) -. - .
4- - _ _, .ter, _ - -.
Comprehensive Plan Ami _
€1evCOMMUNITYand ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PANNINDIVISION
Questions ?
Comprehensive Plan Amendments 20
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: January 22, 2015
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ® old business ❑ new business
❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
FILE NUMBER: STV-2014-0001
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Findings & Recommendations— Street Vacation
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The applicant J.R. Bonnett Engineers, on behalf of the
owner River Sequel, LLC (Fritz Wolff), requests the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped
area along Old Mission Avenue 3,688 square feet in size. The portion of right-of-way proposed
to be vacated is located at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway adjacent
to Assessor's tax parcel number 45124.0138.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140; RCW
35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 8,
2015 and voted 7-0 to recommend a conditional approval of the street vacation (STV-2014-
0001) to City Council.
OPTIONS: Recommend approval of the proposed street vacation findings and
recommendation, recommend approval with changes, or recommend denial.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve findings and recommendation
recommending a conditional approval of the proposed street vacation to the City Council as
proposed.
STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Staff Report without exhibits
2. Findings and Recommendation for STV-2014-0001
RPCA Findings&Recommendations for STV-2014-0001 Page 1 of 1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
` " 01111"\Orak
okane
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
40,Valley
FILE No: STV-2014-0001
STAFF REPORT DATE: December 31, 2014
FILE NO: STV-2014-0001
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old
Mission Avenue approximately 3,688 square feet in size.
STAFF PLANNER: Karen Kendall, Planner, Community Development Department
PROPOSAL LOCATION: The area is located south of parcel 45124.0138, addressed as 16801 East
Mission Parkway, intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway, further located in the SE
quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley,
Washington
PROPERTY OWNER:Fritz Wolff, River Sequel, LLC; 220 West Main; Spokane, WA 99201
APPLICANT: Mark Grandwolh, J.R. Bonnett Engineers; 803 E 3rd Avenue; Spokane, WA 99202
APPROVAL CRITERIA:
1. SVMC-Title 22 (Street Vacations)
2. SVMC - Title 21 (Environmental Controls)
3. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map
Exhibit 2: Aerial Map
Exhibit 3: Application Material
Exhibit 4: Notice of Public Hearing
Exhibit 5: Agency Comments
Exhibit 6: Public Comment
I. PROPERTY INFORMATION
Size and Characteristics: The area is 3,688 square feet located behind a newly constructed
sidewalk connecting Mission Parkway with Centennial Trailhead.
It is flat and consists of native plants and weeds until such time the
weather permits for planting of grass.
Comprehensive Plan Mixed Use Center(MUC)
Designation:
Zoning of Property: Mixed Use Center(MUC)
Existing Land Use: Vacant. Multifamily development located northwest of the right-
of-way is currently under construction.
Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 1 of 4
December 31,2014
II. STAFF ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL
A. COMPLIANCE WITH SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE (SVMC)TITLE 22.140.030—
STREET VACATIONS
Findings:
1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the
public?
The area proposed to be vacated is raw land without pavement, curb or gutter.
Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owner developing a multi-family
development to the north a landscaped area for enhanced aesthetics at the entry to the
Centennial Trailhead and apartment entrance. The vacation is expected to have no
impact on the general public and does not impede access or circulation..
2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access?
The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public use
or access and is not required for current or future public use or access. Should future
development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at
Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement
with the future development.
3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful
to the public?
No. There is no need for a new and different public way.
4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or
need than presently exists?
It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of
the subject right-of-way for public access. Should future development realign Mission
and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed
and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. Staff
received comments from Spokane Transit Authority (STA) stating there is no current
service to the area. Further conversation with STA indicated that future development
will likely warrant an STA bus route. At that time they will have the flexibility to work
with the City and/or property owner to assess the best location for a bus stop along
Mission and Indiana Parkway.
5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private
property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other
governmental agencies or members of the general public?
Staff received 1 public comment for the proposed vacation from a neighboring property
owner. Avista Utilities confirmed they have gas and electric utilities in the right-of-
way and request preservation of utilities. Spokane County Utilities and Consolidated
Irrigation District provided no objection as they have no facilities within the area
proposed to be vacated.
Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 2 of 4
December 31,2014
Conclusions:
The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met.
B. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21—ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS
The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is
categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental
review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA).
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Findings: Staff received 1 public comment from Bob Boyle of Hanson Industries on
December 30, 2014 in favor of the proposed street vacation.
Conclusion(s):
A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on the property December 19, 2014 and notices
were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley permit center and
main reception area the same day. Public hearing notices were mailed to a 400' radius of the
site on December 18, 2014 and notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on
December 19, 2014 and December 26, 2014. Staff concludes that adequate public noticing was
conducted for STV-2014-0001 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures.
IV. AGENCY COMMENTS
Comments were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff
report:
1. City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department (Traffic Engineer)
2. Spokane Transit Authority
3. Avista Utilities
4. Spokane County Utilities
5. Consolidated Irrigation District
V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS
Staff concludes that STV-2014-0001 as proposed is generally consistent, or will be made
consistent, through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria
stated herein.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue
approximately 3,688 square feet in size subject to the following:
1. The completion of the street vacation (File No. STV-2014-0001) including all conditions
below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety (90) days following the
effective date of approval by the City Council.
2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel 45124.0138.
Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 3 of 4
December 31,2014
3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be prepared and recorded with
coordination between the property owner and utility purveyor. The easement with
recording number shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation of
easement submitted to City for verification.
4. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a
record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of
Washington including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any
and all applicable easements for construction,repair and maintenance of existing and future
utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community
Development, or designee for review.
5. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-
way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with
each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the City of
Spokane Valley Street Standards.
6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private
ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording
fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial
responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title.
7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be
automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation
shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting
ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning
district designations.
8. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the City
Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor.
9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of
title by the City.
Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 4 of 4
December 31,2014
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
January 22,2015
The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend
approval of File No. STV-2014-0001, vacating a portion of Old Mission Avenue.
A. Background:
1. Chapter 22.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), governing street
vacations, was adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28,
2007.
2. The privately-initiated street vacation, STV-2014-0001, proposes to vacate an
unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue 3,688 square feet in
size.
3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 8, 2015 and voted 7-0 to
recommend a conditional approval of the street vacation (STV-2014-0001) to City
Council.
B. Planning Commission Findings:
Compliance with SVMC 22.140.030 Planning Commission review and
recommendation
Finding(s):
1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the
public?
The area proposed to be vacated is raw land without pavement, curb or gutter.
Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owner developing a multi-family
development to the north a landscaped area for enhanced aesthetics at the entry to
the Centennial Trailhead and apartment entrance. The vacation is expected to have
no impact on the general public and does not impede access or circulation.
2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public
access?
The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public
use or access and is not required for current or future public use or access.
3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more
useful to the public?
There is no need for a new and different public way.
4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or
need than presently exists?
It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use
of the subject right-of-way for public access. Staff received comments from
Spokane Transit Authority (STA) stating there is no current service to the area.
Further conversation with STA indicated that future development will likely
warrant an STA bus route. At that time they will have the flexibility to work with
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 1 of 3
the City and/or property owner to assess the best location for a bus stop along
Mission and Indiana Parkway.
5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private
property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other
governmental agencies or members of the general public?
Staff received 1 public comment in support of the proposed vacation from a
neighboring property owner. Avista Utilities confirmed they have gas and electric
utilities in the right-of-way and request preservation of utilities. Spokane County
Utilities and Consolidated Irrigation District provided no objection as they have no
facilities within the area proposed to be vacated.
C. Conclusions:
The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met.
D. Recommendation:
Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the vacation of an unimproved
triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue 3,688 square feet in size subject to the
following:
1. The completion of the street vacation (File No. STV-2014-0001) including all
conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety (90) days
following the effective date of approval by the City Council.
2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel 45124.0138.
3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be prepared and recorded with
coordination between the property owner and utility purveyor. The easement with
recording number shall be shown on the record of survey and written
documentation of easement submitted to City for verification.
4. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street
vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered
surveyor in the State of Washington including an exact metes and bounds legal
description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair
and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by
the proponent to the Director of Community and Economic Development, or
designee for review.
5. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to
private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees,
and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any
financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title.
6. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated
shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 2 of 3
in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts.
The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the
applicable zoning district designations.
7. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the
City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor.
8. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any
transfer of title by the City.
Approved this 22nd day of January,2015
Joe Stoy, Chairman
ATTEST
Deanna Horton,Administrative Assistant
Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 3 of 3