2015, 02-03 Study SessionAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Tuesday, February 3, 2015 6:00 p.m.
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY
GOAL
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
1. Steve Worley
2. Gloria Mantz
3. Cary Driskell
4. Erik Lamb
5. Eric Guth
6. Mayor Grafos
7. Mayor Grafos
8. Mike Jackson
ADJOURN
Public Works Bid Process
Historic Preservation
E -Cigarettes
Proposed 2015 Legislative Session
Marijuana Bills
2015 Street Sweeping Services Bid Results
Advance Agenda
Council Comments
City Manager Comments
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Note: Unless otherwise noted above, there will be no public comments at Council Study Sessions. However, Council
always reserves the right to request information from the public and staff as appropriate. During meetings held by the City
of Spokane Valley Council, the Council reserves the right to take "action" on any item listed or subsequently added to the
agenda. The term "action" means to deliberate, discuss, review, consider, evaluate, or make a collective positive or negative
decision. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing,
or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made.
Study Session Agenda February 3, 2015 Page 1 of 1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 3, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ['consent ❑ old business ['new business ['public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Works Bid Process
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Title 39 RCW; SVMC 3.40, 3.50
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN:
BACKGROUND: Council requested information on the Public Works Bid Process and how it
relates to City projects.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E. — Senior Capital Projects Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: Public Works Bid Process presentation slides
Public Works Bid Process
Two Types rThf Bids
a Small Works Bid
Advertisement to Small Works Roster only
Public Bid Opening not required
Formal Bid
Advertisement in Legal Newspaper
Public Bid Opening
WhE - *r) Bid Public Works Projects
Minimums Based on Estimated Project Cost (RCW 39.04)
< $40,000 (single trade) -Quotes Solicited
< $65,000 (multiple trades) -Quotes Solicited
< $300,000 - Small Works Roster Bid Process Used
> $300,000 -Formal Bid Required
The City always has the option of putting a project out to bid.
How are '• -hlic Bids Done?
Staff/Consultant prepares Bid Package
Engineered Stamped Contract Drawings
Engineered Stamped Specifications
Advertisement w/ Bid Opening Date & Location
Bid Proposal Documents (to be returned by each bidder)
Contract Forms
Federal Aid Provisions (if required)
Amendments to WSDOT Standard Specifications
General Special Provisions
Wage Rate Information
Engineers Estimate
How are
'• -hlic Rids Done?
Planholders list created/posted on website
Addendums issued as needed
Public Bid Opening (City Clerk)
Bid Packages reviewed
Errors Corrected - Unit Price vs Extended Total
Addendums acknowledged
Bid Deposit (5% cash or surety bond)
Subcontractor List (Electrical, HVAC, or Plumbing)
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Goals and
Certifications
How are public Bids Done?
• Bids Tabulated
Grant Agency (TIB, WSDOT) Review & Approval
Presented to Council for Award
Bid Tab Example
BID TABULATION
Argonne Corridor Upgrades
Project CIP No. 0060 - 04 Opening Date 1210512014, 10 AIN
Nombe r of Bidders: 2
Kern At Description
0000 Quantity
Engineers Estimate
Cameror.-Reilly. LLC
Arc Electric. LLC
Unit Price
Total cost
Una Price
Total Cast
Unit Price
Total Crit
SchedA -ease aid
MOBILIZATION
5 91 939.71
$ 892660.60
84 800.00
70 000.00
SPCC PLAN
• 300000
5
• 505 DO
$ 50060
5 500 CO
02,
15,000.00
5,5013.0.5
$ 15,00.60
• 3_5,050 00
• 1.5.00.03
S000001
CONSTRUCT ON SU FP/EWING
• 1000000
▪ 10 030_00
5 5,000.00
$ 5000.00
5 5 750.00
5 750 OD
10
11
12
13
18
19
M
21
RECORD G5 (MIN
PROJECT TEMPORARY TR,
REMOVE C EM ENT CONCRI
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRI
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRI
.RIOVE CEMENT CONCRI
SAW GUT ASPHALT GGO SCR
REMOVE OCISTING
REMOVE FENCE
pm ovE AND RELocATE
REM ONE AND RELOCATE
FL...IONE AND RELOCATE
GRAVEL BASE, 41N. DrPTr
CRUSHED SURFACING TOr
CRUSHED SURFACING TOL
22
CRUSHED SURFACING TOI
23
24
25
25
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
HMA CL. 112' P170200..
11018 C1_1(2.. PG 76-28M
JOINT ADHESIVE
DUCTILE IRON STORM 5.
CATCH BASIN TYPE 1
SPILL CONTROL SEPARATC
P.M...1ST EXISTING CATCH L
ADJUST EXISTING VALVE 0
0108 INLET ussE L
EROSION TIROL
BARK MULCH
RIVER POCK
TOPSOIL, TYPE
37
38
39
Rem It Description
11015 Quantity
Engineer Eoimate
Cameron -Reilly -1.M
Arc Electric,. ILC
Lint Price
Total cwi
Una Price
Total 0059
Unit Price
Tota) Cast
40
CEMENT.] NCRETE CURB WALL <181N.
55
38.51
2,12 3.55
60.00
3,300.09
60 05
a1
CEMENT QO NCRETE TRArDC CURB AND GUTTER
L F_
515
30 89
16,93S 05
$ 32.00
17,!1000
40 OLL
52 1,800_00
42
100
20 59
52,059 00
32 00
5 3,200 05
38.06.
3,800.00
93
CEMEISTOONCRETE DR IVEsVAA. APPROACH
65 28
5,302 05
78 OD
69 60
del
DELINEATOR AND CORE HOLE
EACH
600 013
• 3,000 00
5 100 00
• 500 00
93 CPI
45
CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
200
S9.792..30
• 9,000.00
03.00
i12,5002,0
45
CEMEIS T CONCRETE CURB RAMP
EACH
11
1415 70
• 15,572 70
1,803 00
19,80500
1.610 00
NON-INTREDAVE VEHICLE DETECTION SENSOR
EACH
5,500 DO
5 33,000 00
8,250.0
• 49,50000
5 4,700.0
S 28,200-00
NUN -INTRUSIVE VEHICLE DETECTION SENSOR HARDWARE
EAU"
$ 2.20000
S 4,400.0
$ 16,090.60
$ 32,00 .00
10,77500
• 35,550.00
pulaclsoN Box. TIRE
750 03.
550 001
sso
$ 400.0
$ 40000
50
JUNCTION 6PX,TYPE 2
EACH
$ 1,00000
$ 1,000.00
803.0
$ 5,60.00
5
395.0
2,765-00
51
JLJNICT/ON 00%, TYPE
1,350.00
9,450.00
1,800.00
12,000.01
$ 1,750.00
12,250-00
PULLBOX
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM, AI
TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTBM, AI
INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTAI
ELECTRICAL WORN AT CARD
PER MLA NENT SIGNING
PLASTIC CROSSWALK UNE
PLASTIC STOP LINE
PAINT LINE
PLASTIC WIDE LANE UNE
REMOVING PAINTER.
R MOVING PLASTIC LANE
REMOVINGPLASTIC TRAVIS C ARROW
R 0.1OVING PLASTIC CROSS..
.0 BasBidi
rtc rRAH
r00110
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
EO
61
02
63
65
68
500 IFGTALLATION Schee a
PLANT SELECTION - JUN IPI
IRRIGATED/4 SYSTEM REVI.
67
ReconsLL tic[ Knox Intersect
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
PROJECT MPORARi TRAF
PRIM UNE
PLASTIC WIDE LANE UNE
PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW
REMCINING PAINT LINE
REMOVING PLASTIC UNE
REMOVING PLASTIC TRAF FII
R EMOVE CEM ENT CONCH Et
SAW CUT ASPHALT CONCRE
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP
EACH
3
S 2,750.00 0
8,250.0 S
2,900.00 0
0,40.00 S
3,800.0 5
11,400.00
Item N Description Units CNJantity
Engineers Esnrnate
Camer0rt-Rei)ty, LLC
Arc Electric. LLC
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Prate
Tota) Cost
78
CRUSHED SV RFACINC TOP COURSE, S IN. DEPTH
S.Y.
1010
1
19.31
5
19,543.10
22.50
5 22,725.00
5
2500
5 25,250.00
79
1-11110 CL_ 1(2' PG 70-28 FT_ DEPTH
S.Y.
1010
$
54.70
$
59,702.05
5
99.00
5 44,440.00
$
46110
46,460.00
CO
JOINT ADHESIVE
LF.
675
5
5.50
5
3,037.50
5
2.00
5 1,350.00
$
2.00
5 1,354.00
81
ADJUST EX ISTI110 VALVE BOX
EACH
2
1
386.10
5
77220
5
3511.OD
5 602.00
5
23040
460.04
82
RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND
SM.
1.75
1
172.95
S
30,180.54
5
79.00
13,825.00
$
120.0
d 21,400.04
TOEal Sclred 6 - Re5tntct Knox Intersection lAddiwe(
$ 151,342.05
$ 120,967.50
$ 163,273.00
$thea c Sgtal ImQrwements at rttor[tgornery {Additive]
85
PROJECT TEM PORARY TRAFFICCONTROL- SCHEDULE
L.S.
1
1
3909.10
5
3689.14
1
2500.00
5 2500.04
$
21045.00
0 21045.04
73.1
TRA FF C 5ICF14L SYSTEM, ARGON'NEJMONTGOMERY- SCHEDULE r
L3.
1
1
24,590.00
24,594.04
5
23,815.00
5 23,815.00
5
27,395.00
d 27,395.04
Total ached C - Siwial Improvements at Montgomery {Add0tieej2
2$283.10
5 26,31500
$ 44_014033.
TOTAL (All schedules)
5
1,1370,223.16
5 1,142.108.70
$ 1,295,717.00
BID PROPOSAL SUARNARY
Addenda Acknowledged
Subcontractor Lis[
Bed Deposit 20114 Bond tbrm
Local Agency Disadsantaged Business Enterprise tltil iration Certification
Minimum DBE Amount Pequbed to Satisfy Coal Based on Total Sed (596 of Tota I Bid Amount)
Actua 100E Goal Participation Amount- Submitted
Actua I OBE Coal Pattieipaleon Percentage Submitted
Local Agency Disaddaftaged Business Enterprise (080 Written Confirmation Documents
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Coal Faith EfF6rt {01E] Doc urneMation
'Yes
Yes
Yes
537 105.94
510,000.10
5.08%
Yes
110
Yes
Yes
Yes
564,785.85
$187,897.00
19.47%
Yes
Inn
Bid Approval 8( Awe
Grant Projects Bids Reviewed/Approved by Grant Agency
State - TIB
State - FMSIB
Federal - WSDOT/FHWA
Federal - STA/FTA
City Projects Bids Approved by City Council
Award Process for Grant and City Projects:
Bid Award - City Council
Council Authorizing City Manager to Finalize and Execute Contract
Exmp'
Barker Roa
Bid Errors
1 Bridge
49
CONC. CLASS 4000P FOR SHAFT (5-
FOOT DIAM.
C.Y.
C.Y.
362
8440.01)
4•.o+b
1730 7 u o. 00
Vo9� /ao•o)
�.-�_- _-��. -
! ` j • a1• v e7
hJ Q. 0--
50
CONC. CLASS 4000P FOR SHAFT (147-
FOOT DAM.)
51
NEW BARKER ROAD BRIDGE
L.S.
1
52
RETAINING WALLA
L.S.
1
Lump Sum
1
$ 3,483,855.87
$ 3.483,855.87
$ 4,757,009.00
$ 4,757,000.00 t+t
BID TABULATION
Owner: City of Spokane Valley, WA
Project: Barker Road Bridge Replacement
Fed Aid Proj Ro.: BRM 4123(004).
Bid Opening: May 16, 2008
Engineer's Estimate
rgen & Oswood
Cc- struction Co.. Inc.
kern
N o.
Item Description
iSchedule A- Barker Road Bridge Replacement
Units
Quantity
Unit Price
Extended
Total
Unit Price
Extended
Total
49
Cone. Class 4400P for Shaft (5 -foot Diann.)
CY
362
$ 384.38
$ 139,14a75
$ 44030
$ 173,760.00
50
Cone. Class 4400P for Shaft (10 -foot Diarn.)
CY
844
$ 384.38
$ 324,412.50
$ 4 0
$ 405,120.00
51
New Barker Road Bridge
Lump Sum
1
$ 3,483,855.87
$ 3.483,855.87
$ 4,757,009.00
$ 4,757,000.00 t+t
52
Retaining Wall A
Lump Sum
1
$ 21,959.93
$ 21,959.93
$ 19,000.00
$ 19,000.00
53
Retaining Wall B
Lump Sum
1
$ 64,027.19
$ 64,027.19
$ 44,000.00
$ 44,000.00
9
Example Bid Errors
Bid Schedule A --- Sullivan Road West BrtdRe Rcplacelucl>,i
ITEM.#"
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNITS
QUANTITY
PRICEIUNIT
TOTAL
A-1
MOBILIZATION
LS
1
Total
i Gt
13 I ri # ]
r �} r �} b 0
t� l3=
q51:1.5 QYJC
L 1 00°G.
'T
A-2
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
AC
LS
LS
2.2-
i
1
,� 01a
A 3
REMOVING EXISTING BRIDGE SULLIVAN$ULLIVAN
ROAD WEST BRIDGE
A-4
REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND
OBSTRUCTIONS
A-5
SAL"tiFCIJT ACPOR PGC € AVEMENT
LF -IN
3,439
3
}j
BID TAB - SULLIVAN ROAD L'JEST BRIDGE
PHASE 2 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - CIF #0155
PID OPENING: JUNE 13, 2014 - 10:00 a.m. PDT
($11,826,721??)
Initial bid - June 13, 2014
Project to rebid on July 18, 2014
Reale No.Dscriptios
Unlit
Total
4irelrtitr
Enuineev's Eseirnata
GarciaCc+nsvueeio-t, MC.
Apollo, iMt.
Price'U nit
Total
c .. LI skit
Total
Price/Unit
Total
54iE13.1.1EA.2 Sullivan Rnbril W 1 Bdleape Rap!2rdee
A-1
A-2
Al•
A-4
A-5
1...luLilirdtun
Charing And Grubbing
Removing 1Kisainiii Bridge • Sullivm Rood Wast Biidga
Removal 0.f Structures And C5smlrtiont
Sewa�r ACP cmPCC Pays•arvre
L3
AC
LS
LS
L�-IN
1
2.2
1
1
3.439
3 951,067.81}
3 10.0[37.00
3 8[25.000.013
3 7.350.0:1
1.-40c.4,67486
$ 951,0/30.65
.0
$ 22,0000
$ 645,670A0
3 7,350.00
$ 4.667.60
3 .057.[[1$
3 .00
3 .CCl0.0n
1.137 n
5 1,174,006.130
411 .-00_50
5 756.[376:6]
5 15;000.57
3,439_00
# 1,440,606.00
# 60,000.00
#r 4106.000.0[1
& 100,[[10.00
*, 'x_76
5 1,490,600.63
5 1 32.000.00
5 670,0.30.00
5 100,000.00
$ 5,1345_30
A-13Rerrs.va
PCC derwalk�l].aawe} A:prredr
Jr"
188
20.U0
3.7PA.00
16.5]
71,384300
$ 9.00
# 1.99200
10
Exa
Q" Errors
BID TAB - SULLIVAN ROAD WEST RIDGE
PI IASE 2 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT - CIP OM 55
SID OPENING_ JUNE 13. 2014 -10:0o a_m_ PDT
ken No. Description
Total
Unit Quantity
6Yd'6�!!
Ilion** GutlarineWan, inc.1
+4pegR me.
Price/Unit Total
Price/Unit
PricejUnit 1 Total
DO PRI5PCRAL IPARIARV
TOTAL AMOUNT BID BCF EDULE A
5 10,655.94150
5 9,663.127.18
i
S 12.547.124.68 i
TOTAL AMOUNT BID SCHEDULE B
5 826.324.25
5 61793250
S 1.021.436.35 i
TOTAL AMOUNT BID SCHEDULE C (Inc]. WA Slate tales Tax)
5 816.684.73
940,447.42
i
$ 964,096.23
TOTAL AMOUNT BID SCHEDULE D (Ind. WA Slate rales Tax)
379,767.61
309836.31
3 332.395.90
TOTAL AMOUNT BID SCHEDULE E {Incl_ WA State Sales Tax)
^77.668.7=
27293- 57
S 399637.70
TOTAL AMOUNT MD ALL tjtOHwnL
$ 12,596,3106-68
$ 19,748,534.98
i
15,284,090.68
FOUTIMMEill I I
I
a_ Minor irregular j•: Garro entered (.3.43904 in Loth Prio 1Jnit and Talal eoI.onr 3. Amount in Priea'Unit column corrected to 51.00.
b_ Minor irregularit-: Garco left Prioe.'Unit cell blank_ Amount shown reflects amount shown in Total cola nn divided by Unit value.
c. Minor irregularity; Garco entered Total as S16.348.60_ Value shun reflect. rnathmatical cxrectkm.
d_ Garro entered 1.9 963.595.18 Value shown reflect mat-rmaticel correction.
e_ Minor irregularit;-: Garai entered $11.266.00 in Toil column. Value shorn o41octs mathrratical correction.
F. Garca entered 5773.220.70. Value shown reflect mathmatiool correction_
g_ Garco entered 567.270.20_ Value shown reflects rrraihmatical correction_
h_ Garco entered 1440.490.90_ Value shown reflects rrothmatical correction_
Value shown refieci corrected mathematical Total_
j_ Minor irreg dart.- Apollo entered 5329.504.00. Value shown reflects inath matical correction.
k. Minor irregularity Apollo left Total cell blank_ Value shown reflect; rrathrratical correction_
4 MiT 1 1
1
Addenda Acknowledged
Yes
Yes
Subcontractor List
Yes
Yes.
Bid Deposit Surety Bora: Form
Yes
Yes
Local Age.nov Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Utilization Certification
Yes
Yes
Minimum DBE Amount Required to Satisfy Go -al Based on Totem gid (10-): of Total Bid Amount)
5 1,174,857.50
9 1.526.409.09
Actin DBE Goal Participation Arno:mt Submitted
5 840,126.0)
S 1.511.005.05
Actin DBE Goal Participation Peroentage Submitted
7.15:1.
9.90')
Local Agency Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (;DBE) Written Corfirmatien Document
Yes
Yes
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Good Faith Effort (GFE) Dccumerrtaticn
Yes
No
Mobilization Percentage
9.339:6.
9.76.7.
11
Summ
a Specific Bid Requirements
� Bid Results Can Vary
• Bid Approvals Typically Required
• Bid Errors Happen -
Ai Minor Irregularities Can Be Waived
Questions?
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 3, 2015
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ Consent
❑ Information
Department Director Approval:
❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing
® Admin. Report ❑ Pending Legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Historic Preservation Program
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A.020
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On August 19, 2014, staff presented a brief overview
of local historic preservation and special evaluations to City Council. At that meeting, Council
requested to have the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) provide more information
relating to the establishment of a local historic preservation program.
On October 14, 2014, the City of Spokane's Historic Preservation Officer and the Deputy State
Historic Preservation Officer provided more information relating to the establishment of a local
historic preservation program. At that meeting, the City of Spokane's Historic Preservation
Officer stated that the City of Spokane would be interested in contracting for services related to
historic preservation.
BACKGROUND: A historic preservation program will enable the City to offer historic building
rehabilitation project assistance, ranging from state and federal financial incentives to special
consideration with building and zoning codes.
To pursue an in-house historic preservation program, the City needs to become a Certified
Local Government (CLG) which will allow the City to receive technical assistance, apply for
special grant funding, offer special tax valuation to local registered properties, and comment on
federal and state historic preservation actions.
The process for becoming a CLG requires the adoption of a historic preservation ordinance and
the establishment a City Historic Preservation Commission. The State's model historic
preservation ordinance is attached. The commission is required to meet at least four times per
year and have at least five members.
The commission will need technical support from staff and/or a consultant. City of Spokane and
the Spokane Valley Heritage Museum are interested in contracting with the City to provide these
services. A letter of interest was submitted by the museum.
OPTIONS: Discussion only.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: N/A
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A
STAFF CONTACT: Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer
Attachments: PowerPoint Presentation; and Model Historic Preservation Ordinance
Page 1 of 1
Historic Preservation Program
C93
Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer
Topics for Discussion
ca How to establish the historic preservation program
03 Adopt ordinance
03 Establish commission
03 Apply to become a Certified Local Government (CLG)
03 Options to run program
Historic Preservation Program
oa Historic Preservation ordinance
• Template ordinance provided by the State
• Modify template for consistency with City code:
•'• Formatting
• Establishing commission under SVMC 18 Boards &
Authorities
• Ordinance review by legal and Department of
Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP)
Historic Preservation Ordinance
••• Purpose
•• Historic Commission - establishes commission and
identifies responsibilities; minimum of five members
•• Historic Register- establishes register, process for
designating properties
❖ Changes to Historic Register Properties - design review
process
❖ Special Property Tax Valuation (local tax incentive) -
criteria, review, and process
C3-
CLG Application
e),3
ca Adopt Historic preservation ordinance after review
by DAHP
ca Send DAHP
03 List of the new Historic Preservation Commissioners
03 Commission's bylaws
CLG Responsibilities
re)v—
GR
Maintain an active commission (meets 4 times a year)
Ga Follow preservation laws
Professional development (DAHP)
Ga Administer incentives
Ga Review local nominations for Register of Historic Places
Ga Inventory historical sites (WISAARD)
Ga Maintain and list City's Register of Historic Places
Benefits of a ,L
0%3r--
oa Local tax incentives -special tax valuations up to 10
years
oa Eligible for grants from the State Historic
Preservation Office (SHPO)
oa Technical assistance and training from SHPO
oa Allows for a local register of historic properties
Roles and Responsibilities
ca City Council -decision maker for many historic
preservation activities
oa Commission -Primarily advisory
oa Community and Economic Development staff -
assists applicants, processes requests, and provides
support to commission and City Council
Historic Preservation Program Workload
Maawsws
e l
Ga Train commission and write
y
cis DAHP training available once the City is a CLG
Ga Staff support for commission meetings (4 times per year,
minimum)
Ga Unknown level of interest for the program and workload
03 Citizen questions
cis Nomination request
cis Changes to historic register properties
cis Special tax valuations
ca Revise City fee schedule to include HP review fees. Fees
should be affordable to encourage participation
Options to Run the Program
cQ Option 1 - City Staff runs the entire program
oa Option 2 -Consultant provides technical support
through a services contract
cQ Option 3 - City of Spokane provides technical
support through an inter -local agreement
City Staff Runs the Entire Program
(93
Cal Option 1
CED Staff facilitates meeting and program inquiries and
provides technical support to commission
• Staff training is needed
• A consultant might be retained if interest in the program
exceeds expectations
• Cost will be comprised of staff time and training - likely the
most affordable option
Consultant Provides Technical Assistance
C3-
Ga Option 2
❖ CED staff facilitates meetings and program inquiries
❖ Consultant processes applications, provides technical
support to commission, and manages inventory
v Spokane Valley Heritage Museum is interested to provide
consulting services, submitted a letter of interest but no fees
❖ Cost is staff time plus consultant contract; fee to be
negotiated.
City of Spokane Provides Technical Assistance
(93
cap Option 3
❖ CED staff facilitates meetings and program inquiries
❖ City of Spokane to process applications and provide
technical assistance to commission
❖ City of Spokane has provided fixed fee schedule per
review item
❖ Cost staff time plus fixed fee per review item based on
fee schedule
City of Spokane Proposed Review fees
C93
Technical Assistance
Administrative Certificate of $250
Appropriateness (COA)
General COA
$500
Nomination
$1,500
Special Valuation
$1,500
Other services
$100/hr
Fees include administrative staff time, time and travel, recording fees (when applicable) and hearing notice
advertisement.
14
Questions
03
MODEL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Section 1 Purpose
Section 2 Title
Section 3 Definitions
Section 4 Historic Commission
Section 5 Register of Historic Places
Section 6 Review of Changes to Register Properties
Section 7 Review and Monitoring of Properties for Special Property Tax Valuation
SECTION 1. PURPOSE
The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the identification, evaluation, designation, and protection of
designated historic and prehistoric resources within the boundaries of [LOCAL
GOVERNMENT] and preserve and rehabilitate eligible historic properties within the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] for future generations through special valuation, a property tax incentive, as
provided in Chapter 84.26 RCW in order to:
A. Safeguard the heritage of the [CITY/COUNTY] as represented by those buildings,
districts, objects, sites and structures which reflect significant elements of the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] history;
B. Foster civic and neighborhood pride in the beauty and accomplishments of the past, and a sense of
identity based on the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] history;
C. Stabilize or improve the aesthetic and economic vitality and values of such sites, improvements and
objects;
D. Assist, encourage and provide incentives to private owners for preservation, restoration, redevelopment
and use of outstanding historic buildings, districts, objects, sites and structures;
E. Promote and facilitate the early identification and resolution of conflicts between preservation of
historic resources and alternative land uses; and,
F. Conserve valuable material and energy resources by ongoing use and maintenance of the existing built
environment.
SECTION 2. SHORT TITLE
The following sections shall be known and may be cited as the "historic preservation ordinance of
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT]."
SECTION 3. DEFINITIONS
The following words and terms when used in this ordinance shall mean as follows, unless a different meaning
clearly appears from the context:
A.
B.
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Historic Inventory" or "Inventory" means the
comprehensive inventory of historic and prehistoric resources within the boundaries of the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT].
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Historic Preservation Commission" or "Commission" means
the commission created by Section herein.
C. " [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Register of Historic Places", "Local Register", or "Register"
means the listing of locally designated properties provided for in Section herein.
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 1 of 11
D. "Actual Cost of Rehabilitation" means costs incurred within twenty-four months prior to the date of
application and directly resulting from one or more of the following: a) improvements to an existing
building located on or within the perimeters of the original structure; or b) improvements outside of but
directly attached to the original structure which are necessary to make the building fully useable but
shall not include rentable/habitable floor -space attributable to new construction; or c) architectural and
engineering services attributable to the design of the improvements; or d) all costs defined as "qualified
rehabilitation expenditures" for purposes of the federal historic preservation investment tax credit.
E. A "building" is a structure constructed by human beings. This includes both residential and
nonresidential buildings, main and accessory buildings.
F. "Certificate of Appropriateness" means the document indicating that the commission has reviewed the
proposed changes to a local register property or within a local register historic district and certified the
changes as not adversely affecting the historic characteristics of the property which contribute to its
designation.
G. "Certified Local Government" or "CLG" means the designation reflecting that the local government has
been jointly certified by the State Historic Preservation Officer and the National Park Service as having
established its own historic preservation commission and a program meeting Federal and State
standards.
H. "Class of properties eligible to apply for Special Valuation in [LOCAL
GOVERNMENT]" means [ALL/IDENTIFY SELECTED TYPES] properties listed on
the National Register of Historic Places or certified as contributing to a National Register Historic
District which have been substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the
requirements set forth in Chapter 84.26 RCW, until [LOCAL
GOVERNMENT] becomes a Certified Local Government (CLG). Once a CLG, the class of properties
eligible to apply for Special Valuation in [LOCAL GOVERNMENT]
means only [ALL/IDENTIFY SELECTED TYPES] properties listed on
the [LOCAL/LOCAL AND NATIONAL/NATIONAL] Register of
Historic Places or properties certified as contributing to an
[LOCAL/LOCAL AND NATIONAL/NATIONAL] Register Historic District which have been
substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the requirements set forth in
Chapter 84.26 RCW.
I. "Cost" means the actual cost of rehabilitation, which cost shall be at least twenty-five percent of the
assessed valuation of the historic property, exclusive of the assessed value attributable to the land, prior
to rehabilitation.
J. A "district" is a geographically definable area urban or rural, small or large—possessing a significant
concentration, linkage, or continuity of sites buildings, structures, and/or objects united by past events
or aesthetically by plan or physical development.
K. "Emergency repair" means work necessary to prevent destruction or dilapidation to real property or
structural appurtenances thereto immediately threatened or damaged by fire, flood, earthquake or other
disaster.
L. "Historic property" means real property together with improvements thereon, except property listed in a
register primarily for objects buried below ground, which is listed in a local register of a Certified Local
Government or the National Register of Historic Places.
M. "Incentives" are such rights or privileges or combination thereof which the
[CITY/COUNTY] Council, or other local, state, or federal public body or agency, by virtue of
applicable present or future legislation, may be authorized to grant or obtain for the owner(s) of
Register properties. Examples of economic incentives include but are not limited to tax relief,
conditional use permits, rezoning, street vacation, planned unit development, transfer of development
rights, facade easements, gifts, preferential leasing policies, beneficial placement of public
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 2 of 11
improvements or amenities, or the like.
N. "Local Review Board", or "Board" used in Chapter 84.26 RCW and Chapter 254-20 WAC for the
special valuation of historic properties means the commission created in Section herein.
O. "National Register of Historic Places" means the national listing of properties significant to our cultural
history because of their documented importance to our history, architectural history, engineering, or
cultural heritage.
P. An "object" is a thing of functional, aesthetic, cultural, historical, or scientific value that may be, by
nature or design, movable yet related to a specific setting or environment.
Q. "Ordinary repair and maintenance" means work for which a permit issued by the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] is not required by law, and where the purpose and effect of such work is to
correct any deterioration or decay of or damage to the real property or structure appurtenance therein
and to restore the same, as nearly as may be practicable, to the condition prior to the occurrence of such
deterioration, decay, or damage.
R. "Owner" of property is the fee simple owner of record as exists on the [NAME OF
COUNTY] County Assessor's records.
S. "Significance" or "significant" used in the context of historic significance means the following: a
property with local, state, or national significance is one which helps in the understanding of the history
or prehistory of the local area, state, or nation (whichever is applicable) by illuminating the local,
statewide, or nationwide impact of the events or persons associated with the property, or its
architectural type or style in information potential. The local area can include
[NAME OF CITY/TOWN], [NAME OF COUNTY], or [NAME OF
REGION (e.g. southwest)] Washington, or a modest geographic or cultural area, such as a
neighborhood. Local significance may apply to a property that illustrates a theme that is important to
one or more localities; state significance to a theme important to the history of the state; and national
significance to property of exceptional value in representing or illustrating an important theme in the
history of the nation.
T. A "site" is a place where a significant event or pattern of events occurred. It may be the location of
prehistoric or historic occupation or activities that may be marked by physical remains; or it may be the
symbolic focus of a significant event or pattern of events that may not have been actively occupied. A
site may be the location of ruined or now non -extant building or structure of the location itself
possesses historic cultural or archaeological significance.
U. "Special Valuation for Historic Properties" or "Special Valuation" means the local option program
which when implemented makes available to property owners a special tax valuation for rehabilitation
of historic properties under which the assessed value of an eligible historic property is determined at a
rate that excludes, for up to ten years, the actual cost of the rehabilitation. (Chapter 84.26 RCW).
V. "State Register of Historic Places" means the state listing of properties significant to the community,
state, or nation but which may or may not meet the criteria of the National Register.
W. A "structure" is a work made up of interdependent and interrelated parts in a definite pattern of
organization. Generally constructed by man, it is often an engineering project.
X. "Universal Transverse Mercator" or "UTM" means the grid zone in metric measurement providing for
an exact point of numerical reference.
Y. "Waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness" or "Waiver" means the document indicating that the
commission has reviewed the proposed whole or partial demolition of a local register property or in a
local register historic district and failing to find alternatives to demolition has issued a waiver of a
Certificate of Appropriateness which allows the building or zoning official to issue a permit for
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 3 of 11
demolition.
Z. "Washington State Advisory Council's Standards for the Rehabilitation and Maintenance of Historic
Properties" or "State Advisory's Council's Standards" means the rehabilitation and maintenance
standards used by the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Historic Preservation
Commission as minimum requirements for determining whether or not an historic property is eligible
for special valuation and whether or not the property continues to be eligible for special valuation once
it has been so classified.
SECTION 4. HISTORIC COMMISSION
A. Creation and Size
There is hereby established a [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Historic Preservation Commission,
consisting of [5 - 15] members, as provided in subsection below. Members of the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Historic Preservation Commission shall be appointed by the
[TITLE OF CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL] and approved by the [CITY/COUNTY]
Council and shall be residents of the [CITY/COUNTY], except as provided in subsection
below.
B. Composition of the Commission
1. All members of the commission must have a demonstrated interest and competence in historic
preservation and possess qualities of impartiality and broad judgement.
2. The commission shall always include at least [INDICATE NUMBER] professionals who
have experience in identifying, evaluating, and protecting historic resources and are selected from
among the disciplines of architecture, history, architectural history, planning, prehistoric and historic
archaeology, folklore, cultural anthropology, curation, conservation, and landscape architecture, or
related disciplines [CHOOSE ONE, SEVERAL, OR ALL DISCIPLINES]. The commission action that
would otherwise be valid shall not be rendered invalid by the temporary vacancy of one or all of the
professional positions, unless the commission action is related to meeting Certified Local Government
(CLG) responsibilities cited in the Certification Agreement between the [TITLE OF
CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL] and the State Historic Preservation Officer on behalf of the
State. Furthermore, exception to the residency requirement of commission members may be granted by
the [TITLE OF CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL] and
[CITY/COUNTY] Council in order to obtain representatives from these disciplines.
3. In making appointments, the [TITLE OF CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL]
may consider names submitted from any source, but the [TITLE OF CHIEF
LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL] shall notify history and [CITY/COUNTY] development
related organizations of vacancies so that names of interested and qualified individuals may be
submitted by such organizations for consideration along with names from any other source.
C. Terms
The original appointment of members to the commission shall be as follows (this example is for a
commission of seven): three (3) for two (2) years, two (2) for three (3) years; and two (2) for four (4) years.
Thereafter, appointments shall be made for a three (3) year term. Vacancies shall be filled by the
[TITLE OF CHIEF LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIAL] for the unexpired term in the same
manner as the original appointment.
D. Powers and Duties
The major responsibility of the Historic Preservation Commission is to identify and actively encourage the
conservation of the [CITY'S/COUNTY'S] historic resources by initiating and
maintaining a register of historic places and reviewing proposed changes to register properties; to raise
community awareness of the [CITY'S/COUNTY'S] history and historic resources; and to
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 4 of 11
serve as the [CITY'S/COUNTY'S] primary resource in matters of history, historic planning,
and preservation.
In carrying out these responsibilities, the Historic Preservation Commission shall engage in the following:
1. Conduct and maintain a comprehensive inventory of historic resources within the boundaries of the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] and known as the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT]
Historic Inventory, and publicize and periodically update inventory results. Properties listed on the
inventory shall be recorded on official zoning records with an "HI" (for historic inventory designation).
This designation shall not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
2. Initiate and maintain the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Register of Historic Places. This
official register shall be compiled of buildings, structures, sites, objects, and districts identified by the
commission as having historic significance worthy of recognition and protection by the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] and encouragement of efforts by owners to maintain, rehabilitate, and
preserve properties.
3. Review nominations to the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] Register of Historic Places
according to criteria in Section of this ordinance and adopt standards in its rules to be used to
guide this review.
4. Review proposals to construct, change, alter, modify, remodel, move, demolish, or significantly affect
properties or districts on the register as provided in Section ; and adopt standards in its rules to be
used to guide this review and the issuance of a certificate of appropriateness or waiver.
5. Provide for the review either by the commission or its staff of all applications for approvals, permits,
environmental assessments or impact statements, and other similar documents pertaining to identified
historic resources or adjacent properties.
6. Conduct all commission meetings in compliance with Chapter 42.30 RCW, Open Public Meetings Act,
to provide for adequate public participation and adopt standards in its rules to guide this action.
7. Participate in, promote and conduct public information, educational and interpretive programs
pertaining to historic and prehistoric resources.
8. Establish liaison support, communication and cooperation with federal, state, and other local
government entities which will further historic preservation objectives, including public education,
within the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] area.
9. Review and comment to the [CITY/COUNTY] Council on land use, housing and
redevelopment, municipal improvement and other types of planning and programs undertaken by any
agency of the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT], other neighboring communities, the
[COUNTY], the state or federal governments, as they relate to historic resources of the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT].
10. Advise the [CITY/COUNTY] Council and the Chief Local Elected Official generally
on matters of [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] history and historic preservation.
11. Perform other related functions assigned to the Commission by the [CITY/COUNTY]
Council or the Chief Local Elected Official.
12. Provide information to the public on methods of maintaining and rehabilitating historic properties.
This may take the form of pamphlets, newsletters, workshops, or similar activities.
13. Officially recognize excellence in the rehabilitation of historic buildings, structures, sites and districts,
and new construction in historic areas; and encourage appropriate measures for such recognition.
14. Be informed about and provide information to the public and [CITY/COUNTY]
departments on incentives for preservation of historic resources including legislation, regulations and
codes which encourage the use and adaptive reuse of historic properties.
15. Review nominations to the State and National Registers of Historic Places.
16. Investigate and report to the [CITY/COUNTY] Council on the use of various federal,
state, local or private funding sources available to promote historic resource preservation in the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT].
17. Serve as the local review board for Special Valuation and:
a) Make determination concerning the eligibility of historic properties for special valuation;
b) Verify that the improvements are consistent with the Washington State Advisory Council's
Standards for Rehabilitation and Maintenance:
c) Enter into agreements with property owners for the duration of the special valuation period as
required under WAC 254-20-070(2);
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 5 of 11
d) Approve or deny applications for special valuation;
e) Monitor the property for continued compliance with the agreement and statutory eligibility
requirements during the 10 year special valuation period; and
f) Adopt bylaws and/or administrative rules and comply with all other local review board
responsibilities identified in Chapter 84.26 RCW.
18. The commission shall adopt rules of procedure to address items 3, 4, 6, and 18 inclusive.
E. Compensation
All members shall serve [WITH/WITHOUT] compensation.
F. Rules and Officers
The commission shall establish and adopt its own rules of procedure, and shall select from among its
membership a chairperson and such other officers as may be necessary to conduct the commission's
business.
G. Commission Staff
Commission and professional staff assistance shall be provided by the [TITLE OF
LOCAL GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL OR INDICATE USE OF A QUALIFIED CONSULTANT] with
additional assistance and information to be provided by other [CITY/COUNTY] departments as
may be necessary to aid the commission in carrying out its duties and responsibilities under this ordinance.
SECTION 5. REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES
A. Criteria for Determining Designation in the Register
Any building, structure, site, object, or district may be designated for inclusion in the
[NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] if it is significantly associated with the history, architecture,
archaeology, engineering, or cultural heritage of the community; if it has integrity; is at least 50 years
old, or is of lesser age and has exceptional importance; and if it falls in at least one of the following
categories. [SELECT ANY OR ALL OF THE CATEGORIES AND INCLUDE ADDITIONAL
CATEGORIES IF DESIRED]
1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
national, state, or local history.
2. Embodies the distinctive architectural characteristics of a type, period, style, or method of
design or construction, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose
components may lack individual distinction.
3. Is an outstanding work of a designer, builder, or architect who has made a substantial
contribution to the art.
4. Exemplifies or reflects special elements of the [CITY'S/COUNTY'S] cultural,
special, economic, political, aesthetic, engineering, or architectural history.
5. Is associated with the lives of persons significant in national, state, or local history.
6. Has yielded or may be likely to yield important archaeological information related to history
or prehistory.
7. Is a building or structure removed from its original location but which is significant primarily
for architectural value, or which is the only surviving structure significantly associated with an
historic person or event.
8. Is a birthplace or grave of an historical figure of outstanding importance and is the only
surviving structure or site associated with that person.
9. Is a cemetery which derives its primary significance from age, from distinctive design
features, or from association with historic events, or cultural patterns.
10. Is a reconstructed building that has been executed in an historically accurate manner on the
original site.
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 6 of 11
11. Is a creative and unique example of folk architecture and design created by persons not
formally trained in the architectural or design professions, and which does not fit into formal
architectural or historical categories.
B. Process for Designating Properties or Districts to the
[NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER]
1. [ONLY PROPERTY OWNERS/
COMMISSION MEMBERS/ANY PERSON] may nominate a building, structure, site, object,
or district for inclusion in the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER]. Members of the
Historic Preservation Commission or the commission as a whole may generate nominations.
In its designation decision, the commission shall consider the [NAME OF
INVENTORY] and the [CITY/COUNTY] Comprehensive Plan.
2. In the case of individual properties, the designation shall include the UTM reference and all
features—interior and exterior—and outbuildings that contribute to its designation.
3. In the case of districts, the designation shall include description of the boundaries of the
district; the characteristics of the district justifying its designation; and a list of all properties
including features, structures, sites, and objects contributing to the designation of the district.
4. The Historic Preservation Commission shall consider the merits of the nomination, according
to the criteria in Section and according to the nomination review standards established in
rules, at a public meeting. Adequate notice will be given to the public, the owner(s) and the
authors of the nomination, if different, and lessees, if any, of the subject property prior to the
public meeting according to standards for public meetings established in rules and in
compliance with Chapter 42.30 RCW, Open Public Meetings Act. Such notice shall include
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in , [LOCAL
GOVERNMENT] and any other form of notification deemed appropriate by
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT]. If the commission finds that the nominated property is eligible
for the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER], the commission [SHALL
LIST THE PROPERTY IN THE REGISTER/SHALL LIST THE PROPERTY IN THE
REGISTER WITH OWNER'S CONSENT/MAKE RECOMMENDATION TO THE
(City/County) COUNCIL THAT THE PROPERTY BE LISTED IN THE
REGISTER/MAKE RECOMMENDATION TO THE (City/County) THAT THE
PROPERTY BE LISTED IN THE REGISTER WITH OWNER'S CONSENT.] In the case of
historic districts, the commission shall consider [A SIMPLE MAJORITY OF PROPERTY
OWNERS/ PERCENTAGE OF PROPERTY OWNERS] to be adequate for owner
consent. Owner consent and notification procedures in the case of districts shall be further
defined in rules. The public, property owner(s) and the authors of the nomination, if different,
and lessees, if any, shall be notified of the listing.
5. Properties listed on the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] shall be recorded on
official zoning records with an "HR" (for Historic Register) designation. This designation
shall not change or modify the underlying zone classification.
C. Removal of Properties from the Register
In the event that any property is no longer deemed appropriate for designation to the
[NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER], the commission may initiate removal from such designation by the
same procedure as provided for in establishing the designation, Section . A property
[MAY/MAY NOT] be removed from the [NAME OF THE LOCAL REGISTER] without
the owner's consent.
D. Effects of Listing on the Register
1. Listing on the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] is an designation denoting
significant association with the historic, archaeological, engineering, or cultural heritage of
the community. Properties are listed individually or as contributing properties to an historic
district.
2. Prior to the commencement of any work on a register property, excluding ordinary repair and
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 7 of 11
maintenance and emergency measures defined in Section , the owner must request and
receive a Certificate of Appropriateness from the commission for the proposed work.
Violation of this rule shall be grounds for the commission to review the property for removal
from the register.
3. Prior to whole or partial demolition of a register property, the owner must request and receive
a waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness.
4. Once [NAME OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT] is certified as a Certified Local
Government (CLG), [ALL/IDENTIFY SELECTED TYPES] properties
listed on the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] may be eligible for Special Tax
Valuation on their rehabilitation (Section ).
SECTION 6. REVIEW OF CHANGES TO
REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PROPERTIES
A. Review Required
No person shall change the use, construct any new building or structure, or reconstruct, alter, restore,
remodel, repair, move, or demolish any existing property on the [NAME OF LOCAL
REGISTER] or within an historic district on the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER]
without review by the commission and without receipt of a Certificate of Appropriateness, or in the case of
demolition, a waiver, as a result of the review.
The review shall apply to all features of the property, interior and exterior, that contribute to its designation
and are listed on the nomination form. Information required by the commission to review the proposed
changes are established in rules.
B. Exemptions
The following activities do not require a Certificate of Appropriateness or review by the commission:
ordinary repair and maintenance—which includes painting—or emergency measures defined in Section
C. Review Process
1. Requests for Review and Issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness or Waiver
The building or zoning official shall report any application for a permit to work on a designated
[NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] Register property or in a [NAME OF
LOCAL REGISTER] historic district to the commission. If the activity is not exempt from review, the
commission or professional staff shall notify the applicant of the review requirements. The building or
zoning official shall not issue any such permit until a Certificate of Appropriateness or a waiver is
received from the commission but shall work with the commission in considering building and fire
code requirements.
2. Commission Review
The owner or his/her agent (architect, contractor, lessee, etc.) shall apply to the commission for a
review of proposed changes on a [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] property or within a
[NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] historic district and request a Certificate of
Appropriateness or, in the case of demolition, a waiver. Each application for review of proposed
changes shall be accompanied by such information as is required by the commission established in its
rules for the proper review of the proposed project.
The commission shall meet with the applicant and review the proposed work according to the design
review criteria established in rules. Unless legally required, there shall be no notice, posting, or
publication requirements for action on the application, but all such actions shall be made at regular
meetings of the commission. The commission shall complete its review and make its recommendations
within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of receipt of the application. If the commission is unable to
process the request, the commission may ask for an extension of time.
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 8 of 11
The commission's recommendations shall be in writing and shall state the findings of fact and reasons
relied upon in reaching its decision. Any conditions agreed to by the applicant in this review process
shall become conditions of approval of the permits granted. If the owner agrees to the commission's
recommendations, a Certificate of Appropriateness shall be awarded by the commission according to
standards established in the commission's rules.
The commission's recommendations and, if awarded, the Certificate of Appropriateness shall be
transmitted to the building or zoning official. If a Certificate of Appropriateness is awarded, the
building or zoning official may then issue the permit.
3. Demolition
A waiver of the Certificate of Appropriateness is required before a permit may be issued to allow whole
or partial demolition of a designated [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] property or in a
[NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] historic district. The owner or his/her agent shall
apply to the commission for a review of the proposed demolition and request a waiver. The applicant
shall meet with the commission in an attempt to find alternatives to demolition. These negotiations
may last no longer than 45 calendar days from the initial meeting of the commission, unless either party
requests an extension. If no request for an extension is made and no alternative to demolition has been
agreed to, the commission shall act and advise the official in charge of issuing a demolition permit of
the approval or denial of the waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness. Conditions in the case of
granting a demolition permit may include allowing the commission up to 45 additional calendar days to
develop alternatives to demolition. When issuing a waiver the board may require the owner to mitigate
the loss of the [NAME OF LOCAL REGISTER] property by means determined by the
commission at the meeting. Any conditions agreed to by the applicant in this review process shall
become conditions of approval of the permits granted. After the property is demolished, the
commission shall initiate removal of the property from the register.
4. Appeal of Approval or Denial of a Waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness.
The commission's decision regarding a waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness may be appealed to
the [CITY/COUNTY] Council within ten days. The appeal must state the grounds upon
which the appeal is based.
The appeal shall be reviewed by the council only on the records of the commission. Appeal of
Council's decision regarding a waiver of a Certificate of Appropriateness may be appealed to Superior
Court.
SECTION 7. REVIEW AND MONITORING OF PROPERTIES
FOR SPECIAL PROPERTY TAX VALUATION
A. Time Lines
1. Applications shall be forwarded to the commission by the assessor within 10 calendar days of filing.
2. Applications shall be reviewed by the commission before December 31 of the calendar year in which
the application is made.
3. Commission decisions regarding the applications shall be certified in writing and filed with the assessor
within 10 calendar days of issuance.
B. Procedure
1. The assessor forwards the application(s) to the commission.
2. The commission reviews the application(s), consistent with its rules of procedure, and determines if the
application(s) are complete and if the properties meet the criteria set forth in WAC 254-20-070(1) and
listed in Section of this ordinance.
a.
If the commission finds the properties meet all the criteria, then, on behalf of the
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT], it enters into an Historic Preservation Special Valuation
Agreement (set forth in WAC 254-20-120 and in Section of this ordinance) with the
owner. Upon execution of the agreement between the owner and commission, the
commission approves the application(s).
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 9 of 11
b. If the commission determines the properties do not meet all the criteria, then it shall deny the
application(s).
3. The commission certifies its decisions in writing and states the facts upon which the approvals or
denials are based and files copies of the certifications with the assessor.
4. For approved applications:
a. The commission forwards copies of the agreements, applications, and supporting
documentation (as required by WAC 254-20-090 (4) and identified in Section of this
ordinance) to the assessor,
b. Notifies the state review board that the properties have been approved for special valuation,
and
c. Monitors the properties for continued compliance with the agreements throughout the 10 -year
special valuation period.
5. The commission determines, in a manner consistent with its rules of procedure, whether or not
properties are disqualified from special valuation either because of
a. The owner's failure to comply with the terms of the agreement or
b. Because of a loss of historic value resulting from physical changes to the building or site.
6. For disqualified properties, in the event that the commission concludes that a property is no longer
qualified for special valuation, the commission shall notify the owner, assessor, and state review board
in writing and state the facts supporting its findings.
C. Criteria
1. Historic Property Criteria:
The class of historic property eligible to apply for Special Valuation in
[LOCAL GOVERNMENT] means [ALL/IDENTIFY SELECTED TYPES] properties
listed on the National Register of Historic Places or certified as contributing to a National Register
Historic District which have been substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which
meets the requirements set forth in Chapter 84.26 RCW, until [LOCAL
GOVERNMENT] becomes a Certified Local Government (CLG). Once a CLG, the class of property
eligible to apply for Special Valuation in [LOCAL GOVERNMENT]
means [ONLY] [ALL/IDENTIFY SELECTED TYPES] properties
listed on the [LOCAL/LOCAL AND NATIONAL/NATIONAL]
Register of Historic Places or properties certified as contributing to an
[LOCAL/LOCAL AND NATIONAL/NATIONAL] Register Historic District which have been
substantially rehabilitated at a cost and within a time period which meets the requirements set forth in
Chapter 84.26 RCW.
2. Application Criteria:
Complete applications shall consist of the following documentation:
a. A legal description of the historic property,
b. Comprehensive exterior and interior photographs of the historic property before and after
rehabilitation,
c. Architectural plans or other legible drawings depicting the completed rehabilitation work, and
d. A notarized affidavit attesting to the actual cost of the rehabilitation work completed prior to
the date of application and the period of time during which the work was performed and
documentation of both to be made available to the commission upon request, and
e. For properties located within historic districts, in addition to the standard application
documentation, a statement from the secretary of the interior or appropriate local official, as
specified in local administrative rules or by the local government, indicating the property is a
certified historic structure is required.
3. Property Review Criteria:
In its review the commission shall determine if the properties meet all the following criteria:
a. The property is historic property;
b. The property is included within a class of historic property determined eligible for Special
Valuation by the [LOCAL GOVERNMENT] under Section
of this ordinance;
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 10 of 11
c. The property has been rehabilitated at a cost which meets the definition set forth in RCW
84.26.020(2) (and identified in Section of this ordinance) within twenty-four months
prior to the date of application; and d. The property has not been altered in any way which
adversely affects those elements which qualify it as historically significant as determined by
applying the Washington State Advisory Council's Standards for the Rehabilitation and
Maintenance of Historic Properties (WAC 254-20-100(1) and listed in Section of this
ordinance).
4. Rehabilitation and Maintenance Criteria:
The Washington State Advisory Council's Standards for the Rehabilitation and Maintenance of
Historic Properties in WAC 254-20-100 shall be used by the commission as minimum requirements for
determining whether or not an historic property is eligible for special valuation and whether or not the
property continues to be eligible for special valuation once it has been so classified.
D. Agreement:
The historic preservation special valuation agreement in WAC 254-20-120 shall be used by the commission
as the minimum agreement necessary to comply with the requirements of RCW 84.26.050(2).
E. Appeals:
Any decision of the commission acting on any application for classification as historic property,
eligible for special valuation, may be appealed to Superior Court under Chapter 34.05.510 -34.05.598
RCW in addition to any other remedy of law. Any decision on the disqualification of historic property
eligible for special valuation, or any other dispute, may be appealed to the County Board of
Equalization.
DRAFT HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE
Page 11 of 11
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 3, 2015
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business
['information ® admin. report
Department Director Approval:
❑ new business ['public hearing
['pending legislation ['executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative Report — SVMC 7.40 — electronic cigarette (e -cigarette)
regulations relating to minors.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 7.40
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: In mid -2010, Council heard a report from the Spokane
Regional Health District ("SRHD") on E -Cigarettes, including a request to adopt a regulation
pertaining to sales to minors. On February 22, 2011, Council adopted SVMC 7.40 which
provides regulations for e -cigarettes relating to minors under the age of 18. Nearly identical
regulations were also adopted by the surrounding municipalities and Spokane County for a
consistent approach in protecting the public health on this issue.
BACKGROUND: The Council recently asked whether the City can consider amending its
regulations regarding sales and use of e -cigarettes and liquids for use in the e -cigarettes to
raise the age from under 18 to under 21. The scope of the inquiry did not include sales and use
of regular tobacco products like cigarettes, cigars, and chewing tobacco. Staff was concerned
that it would be difficult to enforce regulations that had different age restrictions for e -cigarettes
than tobacco products, particularly in that it might cause some young people 18-20 years of age
to choose to use tobacco products rather than e -cigarettes if e -cigarettes could not be legally
used until age 21.
The Washington State Attorney General, Bob Ferguson, recently introduced a bill to the
Legislature that, if passed, would increase the age for the use of any tobacco products or e -
cigarettes throughout the state, from 18 to 21. This would appear to fully address the issue
raised by the Council. It is unclear what will happen with this bill. Staff recommends waiting to
see how it progresses before making any decisions on whether the City wants to amend the
City Code to address this issue.
OPTIONS: (1) monitor the proposed legislation under SB 5494 and HB 1458; (2) take other
action as appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None at this time.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: SVMC 7.40
Chapter 7.40 ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES AND RELATED DE... http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/SpokaneValley/html/spokaneva...
Chapter 7.40
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES AND RELATED DEVICES
Sections:
7.40.010 Purpose and intent.
7.40.020 Definitions.
................
7.40.030 Sampling and sales to minors prohibited.
7.40.040 Coupon redemption.
7.40.050 Purchase by minors prohibited.
7,40.060 Prohibition signage to be posted - Identification required.
7 40.070 Mechanical sales restricted.
7.40 080 Penalties and enforcement.
7.40.090 Chapter to be harmonized with state and federal law.
7.40.010 Purpose and intent.
The purpose and intent of this chapter is to protect minors from the hazards of nicotine addiction and the dangers of ingesting products with no
regulatory oversight as to their purity, contents, and potential negative health impacts. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
7.40.020 Definitions.
As used in this chapter:
"Electronic cigarette" or "e -cigarette" means an electronic device usually composed of a mouthpiece, a heating element or atomizer, a battery, and
electronic circuits that provides a gas derived from liquid nicotine and/or other substances which is inhaled by a user simulating smoking. The term
includes such devices, regardless of the details of the product appearance or marketed name, generally manufactured to resemble cigarettes, cigars,
pipes, or other smoking devices.
"Liquid nicotine" means any liquid product composed either in whole or part of nicotine, propylene glycol and/or other similar substances and
manufactured for use with e -cigarettes to be converted into a gas for inhaling.
"Minor" means someone under 18 years of age.
"Person" means any natural person, individual, corporation, unincorporated association, proprietorship, firm, partnership, joint venture, joint stock
association, or other entity or business of any kind. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
7.40.030 Sampling and sales to minors prohibited.
A. No person may give, distribute, transfer, sell, market, or offer e -cigarettes, their components, or samples to persons under 18 years of age.
B. It is a defense to a prosecution for violation of this section when the person making the gift, distribution, transfer, sale, marketing, or offer as a gift,
transfer, sale, marketing, or sample reasonably relied on any of the officially issued identifications referenced in RCW 70.155.090 showing the purchaser
or recipient was at least 18 years old. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
7.40.040 Coupon redemption.
No person shall give or distribute e -cigarettes, or their components, to a person by a coupon if such coupon is redeemed in any manner that does not
require an in-person transaction in a retail store to help prevent redemption of such merchandise by a minor. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
7.40.050 Purchase by minors prohibited.
No person under the age of 18 may purchase, attempt to purchase, possess, or obtain e -cigarettes or their components. This prohibition does not apply
to activities or enforcement actions under the control of a City, state, or federal law enforcement authority or Spokane Regional Health District. (Ord.
11-003 § 1. 2011).
7.40.060 Prohibition signage to be posted — Identification required.
A. Any person selling, marketing, displaying, giving, or distributing e -cigarettes or their components shall display a printed sign, posted so that it is clearly
visible to anyone purchasing e -cigarettes or their components. The sign must be in contrasting colors and at least 20 point type and must read
substantially as follows:
IF YOU ARE UNDER 18, YOU COULD BE SUBJECT TO PENALTY FOR PURCHASING E -CIGARETTES OR RELATED DEVICES OR THEIR
COMPONENTS - SVMC 740.050. THE SALE OF E -CIGARETTES OR RELATED DEVICES OR THEIR COMPONENTS TO PERSONS UNDER THE
AGE OF 18 IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED - SVMC 7.40.030. PHOTO ID REQUIRED.
B. When there may be a question of a person's age, identification of at least the sufficiency referenced in RCW 70.155.090 shall be required by any
person selling, giving, or distributing e -cigarettes or their components. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
7.40.070 Mechanical sales restricted.
A. No person shall sell or permit to be sold e -cigarettes or their components through any device that mechanically dispenses such products unless the
device is located fully within premises from which minors are prohibited, or in industrial worksites where minors are not employed nor permitted, and not
less than 10 feet from all entrance or exit ways to and from each premises.
1 of 2 1/28/2015 8:25 AM
Chapter 7.40 ELECTRONIC CIGARETTES AND RELATED DE... http://www.codepublishing.com/WA/SpokaneValley/html/spokaneva...
B. It is a defense to this section if the person demonstrates to the satisfaction of the building official that it is architecturally impracticable for the device to
be located not less than 10 feet from all entrance and exit ways. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
7.40.080 Penalties and enforcement.
Violation of any provision of this chapter by a minor shall be a class 3 civil infraction under SVMC 1.10.010 and Chapter 7.80 RCW. Violation of any
provision of this chapter by anyone other than a minor shall be a class 1 civil infraction under SVMC 1.10.010 and Chapter 7.80 RCW. Each transaction
is a new and separate violation.
This chapter shall be enforced by the chief of the City of Spokane Valley police, or his or her designee, and the health officer for the Spokane Regional
Health District, or his or her designee, who shall collectively be the "enforcement officer" as that terminology is used in Chapter 7.80 RCW. (Ord. 11-003
§1,2011).
7.40.090 Chapter to be harmonized with state and federal law.
A. This chapter shall be harmonized to avoid any conflict with Chapter 70.155 RCW and with all other state or federal preempting laws or regulations.
Nothing in this chapter diminishes the authority of the City to enforce RCW 70.155.080 or any other applicable laws or regulations.
B. This chapter shall be repealed on the day that state or federal legislation goes into effect incorporating either the same or substantially similar
provisions as are contained in this chapter, or in the event that a pertinent state or federal administrative agency issues and promulgates regulations
preempting such action by the City. The city council may repeal this chapter whether or not identical or substantially similar state or federal legislation
has been enacted for the purposes of triggering the provisions of this subsection. (Ord. 11-003 § 1, 2011).
The Spokane Valley Municipal Code is current through
Ordinance No. 14-021, passed December 9, 2014.
Disclaimer: The City Clerk's Office has the official version of the
Spokane Valley Municipal Code. Users should contact the City
Clerk's Office for ordinances passed subsequent to the ordinance
cited above.
City Website: http Pviv, .spokanevalley.org! (hltp:/wrvnv.spokanevalley orgi)
City Telephone: (509) 720-5102
Code Publishing Company (httpi/www.codepublishing.coml)
2 of 2 1/28/2015 8:25 AM
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: February 3, 2015
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business
❑ information ® admin. report
Department Director Approval:
❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Update on Legislative Agenda for Marijuana
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 69.50 (Initiative 502 has been codified as RCW 69.50) and
WAC 314-55; RCW 69.51A (governing medical marijuana)
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council adopted its Legislative Agenda for the 2015-
2017 Legislative Session on November 4, 2014.
BACKGROUND: On November 4, 2014, City Council adopted its Legislative Agenda for the
2015-2017 Legislative Biennium. In its agenda, Council included an item that provided:
Reconciliation of Medical and Recreational Marijuana
The City of Spokane Valley supports the reconciliation of the recreational and medical
marijuana statutes. Medical marijuana remains unregulated and is not subject to the
same excise tax as recreational marijuana. There also continues to be a strong
incentive for individuals to abuse the medical marijuana system to avoid the higher
prices and limited availability of the recreational marijuana. The City would support
development of one system that would regulate medical and recreational marijuana,
(including the elimination of medical marijuana), in Washington State. Additionally, the
City would support State regulations which close gaps within current legislation: Vaping,
edibles, oils and "private" consumption/facilities; and under age possession and
consumption.
As of the week of January 26, 2015, there had been at least 18 marijuana -related bills that had
been introduced that were identified and are being tracked by the City's State Legislative
lobbyist, Briahna Taylor (with Gordon Thomas Honeywell). Staff continues to track the bills that
have been introduced and to review for necessary input based on Council's legislative agenda.
A list of the marijuana -related bills identified by Gordon Thomas Honeywell is attached.
OPTIONS: Discussion.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A.
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson, City Manager; Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: Marijuana -related bills identified by Gordon Thomas Honeywell
Bill #
Short Description
Sponsor
Description
Reconciliation
SB 5052
Establishing the cannabis patient
protection act. ** There has been
an agreement that this bill will be
the vehicle for any agreement on
medical/recreational marijuana**
The bill is work in progress and will
likely change.
Rivers
• Medical MJ is regulated separate from Rec Mi.
• Patient Grow, Purchase, & Possession
o Defin. of medical patient is "significant interference w/ activities of
daily living"
o Minor patient can possess w/ parent authorization, but cannot
purchase or grow.
o Patients can grow 6 plants, unless health care professional authorizes
higher (current law is 15)
o Patients can possess 3 X the amount as a rec. mj user
o Patients can purchase MJ w/out paying sales & use tax
• Medical Retail
o Medical MJ retail required to get license issued by LCB
o Must purchase MJ from licensed MJ producer/processor
o Must carry products that DOH says is beneficial to patients
o Cannot sell any product that can be smoked, or paraphernalia that can
be used to smoke.
o May only sell to patients & designated providers
• Med MJ database is created
o Health care professional enters the patient or provider into database
and provides an authorization card to patient. Valid for 2 yrs.
• LCB is no longer required to set a cap on $ of MJ retail licenses.
• Collective gardens are repealed. Instead up to 4 medical patients can
participate in cooperative.
o Cooperatives must be registered w/ LCB and must be at least 25 miles
away from a med MJ retailer.
o MJ grown in cooperative is only to be used by cooperative members.
Revenue Sharing
SB 5417
Concerning local government
marijuana policies.
Rivers
• Provides for local revenue sharing, in accordance with the WSAC/AWC
formula
HB 1165
Concerning the establishment of a
dedicated local jurisdiction
marijuana fund and the
distribution of a specified
percentage of marijuana excise tax
revenues to local jurisdictions.
Condotta
• Distributes revenue to the local level by creating a local jurisdiction MJ fund.
• Not distributed according to WSAC/AWC distribution.
Other bills Introduced
HB 1335
Permitting cities, towns, and
counties to reduce the buffer
between recreational marijuana
businesses and various entities.
Condotta
• Allows cities and counties to permit recreational marijuana businesses within
1,000 feet but no less than 500 feet from schools, parks, etc.
HB 1359
Ensuring safe, responsible, and
legal acquisition of marijuana by
adults.
Moscoso
• Makes purchasing MJ under age 21 a crime.
• Makes entered a MJ licensed premises under age 21 illegal.
• Makes giving MJ to someone under 21 a crime.
(SB
5402)
HB 1360
Concerning marijuana, useable
marijuana, and marijuana-infused
products in public.
Moscoso
• Makes consuming MJ products in a public place (including MJ concentrate)
unlawful. Definition of public place is the same as for alcohol consumption.
(SB
5398)
HB 1411
Concerning the siting of marijuana
facilities.
Moscoso
• Allows cities to site MJ within the 1,000-foot buffer if the city could otherwise
not site a MJ retail facility within the city. Cannot exempt the 1,000-foot
buffer around schools.
HB 1412
Concerning municipalities
prohibiting the operation of
recreational marijuana production
processing, and retail facilities
within their jurisdictional
boundaries.
Moscoso
• Requires voter approval for any city or county ordinance prohibiting the siting
of MJ businesses in its boundaries. (why does sec.1, subsection (2) only
mention counties,and not cities?)
• Applies only to recreational MJ businesses.
• Cities w/ out recreational MJ do not get any excise tax revenues (no revenue
provided in bill)
HB 1413
Revising licensing regulations
pertaining to the buffer distances
required between recreational
marijuana businesses and specified
Moscoso
• States that buffer distances are $1,000-feet around any schools, and 100-feet
around any recreation center, child care facility, public park, public transit,
library, etc.
public and private facilities.
HB 1438
Permitting cities, towns, and
counties to prohibit the
production, processing, and sale of
marijuana under Initiative Measure
No. 502 only by public vote.
Sawyer
• Allows a voter to bring forward a petition asking a city or county to prohibiting
Mi. Petition must be signed by 30% or more of registered voters in the
jurisdiction. It is then put on a ballot for a vote.
• Allows legislative authority of city or county to put the issue on the ballot.
• If occurs in a county, only applies to unincorporated areas.
HB 1461
Relating to marijuana.
Hurst
• Title-only bill.
SB 5002
Concerning traffic infractions for
marijuana, marijuana based
substances, or marijuana infused
substances.
Rivers
• It is a traffic infraction to consume marijuana, or a marijuana-based substance
in a motor vehicle when the vehicle is upon a highway. It is a traffic infraction
for a person to possess a receptacle containing marijuana while in a motor
vehicle upon a highway if the container has been opened or a seal broken or
the contents partially removed.
• An open container may be kept in the trunk of the vehicle or other area not
normally occupied by the driver or passenger. A glove compartment is within
the area of the driver or passenger. Exceptions are provided for certain
vehicles such as campers, motor homes, and for -hire vehicles.
SB 5130
Restricting marijuana producer and
processor businesses from being
located in certain residential and
rural areas.
Pearson
• MJ producers and processors cannot be in areas zoned for residential use, or
an area zoned for rural use with a minimum lot size of five acres. The bill
would apply prospectively to new licenses, and to the renewal of existing
licenses.
SB 5398
Concerning marijuana, useable
marijuana, and marijuana-infused
products in public.
Rivers
• Makes consuming MJ products in a public place (including MJ concentrate)
unlawful. Definition of public place is the same as for alcohol consumption.
(HB
1360)
SB 5402
Ensuring safe, responsible, and
legal acquisition of marijuana by
adults.
Conway
• Makes purchasing MJ under age 21 a crime.
• Makes entered a MJ licensed premises under age 21 illegal.
• Makes giving MJ to someone under 21 a crime.
(HB
1359)
SB 5450
Expanding the restrictions on
locating marijuana businesses.
O'Ban
• Adds "licensed chemical dependency program" & "locations where children
congregate" to one of the facilities around which local jurisdictions must zone.
SB 5519
Enacting the comprehensive
marijuana reform act.
Kohl-
Welles
SB 5572
Concerning the sales, distribution,
and delivery of marijuana.
Kohl -
Welles
uo!}eingel p!8 :SIN3INHDylly
D
c_
(D
O
(D
m
(0
(D
(D
:1Dy1NOD JAI'S
m
G)
c
c
0
0
0
0
(D
0
0
Cr co
(D
a)m
z
O
3 z
m C)
c
Q I-
• -13
(n
(D CO
c
�
Q0
_• -•
•
Q 0
It 0
N)
o
(0 5.
(D
3 O
(7).
m�
c
o (fl
o_O
N
O
O
v
Q
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion
00 U) cn O H m C— —I * Q0 7 NW
O m y a 7� a' ( m O oD
D _1 <.= -s (-0 m c (DD-
�o �C)
(D z W 0 c c ?. o '� m = m v 0
F3 co c o Qm, NW o �� Q�
p -a 0 3 t�' (D D 3 N O O CO5. c C
O ,--.- ' Da z
✓ Efl, --D� - 0Y�cc-h0
Og0 • �Q n,ma)>c,�(D DmFIT(„-0..
• m
• 0
(D * "."• 0
o Qcr0 cn�cr �voi v
Eh Q o(D •
�a_m v w -' o v m Q-
D Q Q (D a- (D O (D (GD
N
� � o� (DH 2 *U)mal(�o.
o st 01 — O (D _ 0 Cn v* _. E
_� • O -' o r (D S• O (D (I v
a v cow •( • D • o m ���0
Fa. Q a �� 0� w _—'
m
O 0 a, O D- 0 c 0 (D
ca, D o m c - 0 c.% U) c Q D
O m D (D O o
n 0o (0i) 71 w
Q CO
m DU) �'�
(D 0 v r' v,_ v H O O p (D
—n, D- -% n,
n, D w(D*D m▪ (DQ�w
_ cn 0n,� m CO mm
o m DJ D <' W74.
� DJ Q) (1)
(D (Q V, (D (D 0 — 7
N (D �� NQ O D <.Cn
O cQ Q-hQ00 0� (0D (D
- _ to , 01 D (D U) 0 U, G
1— 0 D. (D `G 0 Q �. U) O (D
3 r`D='mOcoi O(Q`°�u,
(D N 3 (D D (D DJ N (D
O v (D 3 n, Da G � 5' Ei�
-' C00 0-2 _•0 C) (.31'
(' D Q - c (D
a) (p ..._• (7)'
- N g.v ccn0
o- o Oc - fl, U, (D
a, u) c D O N co <* 0 D -
((DD v N DJ O (0D (0D " (D
O (D 3. -0 -0 0)
v m v m o 0-
(T). 5 O No- a) D 0
(0 —, • (D U) O Q to
Approval of Street Sweeping Services Agreement in
co
W Ci)
C
.C/)m
•
P z
z_
N - z
C3�
Tr
j m
w
rn0)
r
z
0
(1)
w
co
O
0
co
O
Co
0
(D
W
N
O
O
D
0
(D
C)
CD
n
tU
tU
❑ ❑
O 0
� 0
3 • 0
0
® ❑
Q • Q
3.o-
5 c
•
-o - • 0
o ma'
❑ ❑
-o
0
Q
0
0.
O
❑ ❑
0 0-
. =
c
•
a) CD
0
ssau!snq Mau
:leno.iddy .io}oa.iia 1.ueuapedea
BID TABULATION
2015 Street Sweeping Services
Bid No. 14-059 - Bid Opening Date 01/23/2015
Spokkn
� . MiHey
Item Units Quantity
Engineers Estimate
AAA Sweeping, LLC
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Price
Total Cost
Sweeping, Mechanical Type
Hours
60
$153.84
$9,230.40
$156.05
$9,363.00
Sweeping, Regenerative Air Type
Hours
1800
$153.84
$276,912.00
$155.98
$280,764.00
Sweeping, High Efficiency Vacuum Type
Hours
700
$155.00
$108,500.00
$155.90
$109,130.00
Water Truck or Truck -Mounted Power Washer
Hours
450
$114.34
$51,453.00
$116.83
$52,573.50
Foreman
Hours
200
$75.00
$15,000.00
$55.00
$11,000.00
Dump Truck
Hours
200
$114.34
$22,868.00
$116.32
$23,264.00
Loader
Hours
35
$112.67
$3,943.45
$111.00
$3,885.00
Total Bid Schedule -
$487,906.85
$489,979.50
Bid Opening Checklist
Price Proposal
Non -Collusion Declaration
Bid Deposit Form & Bond
Contractor's Statement of Responsibility
AAA Sweeping, LLC
YES
YES
YES
YES
To:
From:
Re:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of January 29, 2015; 8:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
Council & Staff
City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
February 9, 2015: Special Joint Meeting with Board of County Commissioners: 9:00 a.m.
Meeting will be held in City Council Chambers (tentative topics include marijuana; legislative agendas, rail
transport issues, status of 2014 UGA, etc.)
February 10, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-002 Adopting Marijuana Findings of Fact — Erik Lamb
3. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-003 for Plat Time Ext — Micki Harnois
4. Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract — Eric Guth
5. Admin Report: Old Mission Ave Street Vacation (STV 2014-0001) — Karen Kendall
6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
[due Mon, Feb 2]
(5 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 60 minutes]
February 17, 2015, Special Meeting Winter Workshop (8:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m.)
Tentative topics: Economic Development
Legislative Agendas and Update
Public Works Projects
Existing City Hall Renovation
[due Mon, Feb 9]
Law and Justice Council
Civic Facility Capital Projects Fund
City Hall
Miscellaneous: oil and coal trains, marijuana. Etc.
February 17, 2015 — 6:00 p.m. meeting cancelled in lieu of Special Workshop meeting
February 18-19, 2015 — AWC City Action Days Legislative Session
February 24, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Tues, Feb 17]
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-002 Adopting Marijuana Findings of Fact — Erik Lamb (20 minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-003 for Plat Time Ext — Micki Harnois (10 minutes)
4. First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-004 Street Vacation Old Mission Ave — Karen Kendall (10 minutes)
5. Admin Report: Comp Plan, Site Specific Amendments — Marty Palaniuk, Christina Janssen (20 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
7. Info Only: (a) Amended 2015 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP);
(b) Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 70 minutes]
March 3, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Feb 23]
1. Proposed Amended 2015 TIP — Steve Worley (20 minutes)
2. Accomplishments Report 2014 — Mike Jackson (tentative) (60 minutes)
3. Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
4. Info Only: Congst. Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) 2018-2020 Call for Projects[*estimated meeting: 85 min]
National League of Cities, City Conference, Washington, D.C.: March 7-11
March 10, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. (possible no meeting)
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2015 TIP — Steve Worley
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-004 Street Vacation Old Mission Ave
4. Admin Report: CMAQ Call for Projects — Eric Guth
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
[due Mon, March 2]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
— Karen Kendall (10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 45 minutes]
Draft Advance Agenda 1/29/2015 2:52:34 PM Page 1 of 2
March 17, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
March 24, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution Amending 2015 TIP — Steve Worley
3. Motion Consideration: CMAQ Call for Projects — Eric Guth
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
5. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
March 31, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
April 7, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
April 14, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
April 21, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[*estimated
April 28, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
3. Info Only: (a) Proposed 2016-2021 TIP; (b) Depaitinent Monthly Reports
May 5, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley
2. Advance Agenda
May 12, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year Tip — Steve Worley
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
Mav 19, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
Mav 26, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2016-2021 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
4. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports
*time for public or Council comments not included
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Railroad Quiet Zones
Setback Requirements
Sidewalks and Developments
Spokane Regional Transportation Mgmt Ctr
Avista Electrical Franchise
Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement
Governance Manual
Marijuana, Minor in Consumption
Public Safety Quarterly Costs
[due Mon, March 9]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, March 16]
(5 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
meeting: 40 minutes]
[due Mon, March 23]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, March 30]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, April 6]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, April 13]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, April 20]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, April 27]
(25 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, May 4]
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, May 11]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, May 18]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 1/29/2015 2:52:34 PM Page 2 of 2