The URL can be used to link to this page

2015, 02-24 Regular Meeting AMENDED AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday,February 24,2015 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER: INVOCATION: Pastor Al Hulten,Valley Assembly Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: ROLL CALL: APPROVAL OF AGENDA: INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: MAYOR'S REPORT: PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on Feb 24,2015 Request for Council Action Form,Totaling: $2,386,658.32 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending February 15,2015: $304,954.63 c.Approval of February 3,2015, Council Study Session Format Meeting Minutes d.Approval of February 10,2015,Council Regular Formal Format Meeting Minutes NEW BUSINESS: Added Item: Proposed Emergency Ordinance 15-005 Adopting a Moratorium on Mining and Mineral Product Manufacturing-Erik Lamb [public comment] 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-002 Adopting Moratorium Findings of Fact—Erik Lamb [public comment] 3.Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-003 for Plat Time Extension—John Hohman[public comment] 4.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-004 Street Vacation Old Mission Avenue—Karen Kendall [public comment] PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and address for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. Council Agenda 02-24-15 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5. Draft Reimbursement Resolution 15-001 —Erik Lamb 6. Draft Resolution 15-002,Drainage Easement Release— Chad Riggs 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos INFORMATION ONLY 8. Browns Park Volleyball Project 9. Proposed Amended 2015 Transportation Improvement Program(TIP) 10. Department Monthly Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meeting Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting)are generally held the 1st,3rd and 5th Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments; but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 02-24-15 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 02/05/2015 34599-34615 $47,816.61 02/06/2015 6047-6048 $97.00 02/06/2015 34616-34650; 1305100211;205150014 $1,860,126.76 02/10/2015 5043; 5058-5061; 5073; 34651-34652 $276,576.25 02/12/2015 6049-6051 $156.00 02/12/2015 34653-34706 $77,048.87 02/13/2015 34707-34725 $52,918.78 02/18/2015 10; 5074, 5075, 5077, 5078;34726 $71,918.05 GRAND TOTAL: $2,386,658.32 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511 City Council 101 —Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths &Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 106—Solid Waste 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 120-CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 121—Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.032.000. Public Works 123 —Civil Facilities Replacement 001.058.050.558. Comm. Develop.-Administration 204—Debt Service 001.058.055.558. Comm. Develop.—Develop.Eng. 301 —Capital Projects(1st REET) 001.058.056.558. Community Develop.-Planning 302 - Special Capital Proj (2n1'/4% REET) 001.058.057.558. Community Develop.-Building 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.076.000.576. Parks& Rec—Administration 304—Mirabeau Point Project 001.076.300.576. Parks &Rec-Maintenance 307—Capital Grants 001.076.301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 310—Civil Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.304.575. Parks &Rec- Senior Center 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076.305.571. Parks &Rec-CenterPlace 312—Capital Reserve 001.090.000.511. General Gov't-Council related 402—Stormwater Management 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 403 —Aquifer Protection Area 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 501 —Equipment Rental &Replacement 001.090.000.518. General Gov't-Centralized Services 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural&Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 02/05/2015 11:41:39AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34599 2/5/2015 000030 AVISTA 290167027 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES NOT ON MASTER BILLIN 16.09 Total : 16.09 34600 2/5/2015 000841 BCI CREATIVE INC 12104 001.076.305.575 CENTERPLACE WEBSITE DESIGN: 35.00 Total : 35.00 34601 2/5/2015 003300 CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL January 2015 001.090.000.519 SUPPLIES: GEN GOV KITCHEN 375.47 Total : 375.47 34602 2/5/2015 004132 COBBLESTONE CATERING&EVENTS 2 001.076.305.575 SERVICES RENDERED CENTERPL 1,927.25 Total : 1,927.25 34603 2/5/2015 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 January 2015 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:CP 63.98 Total : 63.98 34604 2/5/2015 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 January 2015 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 183.70 Total : 183.70 34605 2/5/2015 001911 GLOVER MANSION&, RED ROCK CATEF CP1122 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES AT CENTERPLA( 152.18 Total : 152.18 34606 2/5/2015 003277 INLAND NW BUSINESS ALLIANCE 21961 001.076.305.575 2015 ADVERTISING FOR CENTERF 1,350.00 21962 001.076.305.575 2015 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 150.00 Total : 1,500.00 34607 2/5/2015 002990 INPRO 300 001.076.305.575 RADIO REMOTE-OPEN HOUSE 150.00 Total : 150.00 34608 2/5/2015 001635 ISS FACILITY EVENT SERVICES 823124 001.076.305.575 EVENT SVCS AT CENTERPLACE 136.96 832400 001.076.305.575 JANUARY 2015 MONTHLY CLEANII` 7,136.00 Total : 7,272.96 34609 2/5/2015 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC February 2015 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 34,000.00 Total : 34,000.00 34610 2/5/2015 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY F974225 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 19.57 F974338 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 201.03 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 02/05/2015 11:41:39AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34610 2/5/2015 001860 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY (Continued) Total : 220.60 34611 2/5/2015 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 6453583 001.016.000.521 MONTHLY SERVICES AT PRECINC- 1,467.47 Total : 1,467.47 34612 2/5/2015 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 January 2015 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 50.23 January 2015 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 43.48 Total : 93.71 34613 2/5/2015 001992 SPOKANE HOTEL MOTEL ASSOC 1413 001.076.305.575 2015 ALLIED MEMBERSHIP DUES 300.00 Total : 300.00 34614 2/5/2015 003532 STERICYCLE COMMUNICATION, SOLUTI 150111173101 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SVC: CP SEA4590531 31.20 Total : 31.20 34615 2/5/2015 001472 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES 59010838 001.076.300.576 TC/PA ANALYSIS PARKS 27.00 Total : 27.00 17 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 47,816.61 17 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 47,816.61 Page: 2 3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 02/06/2015 1:09:24PM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6047 2/6/2015 004156 ABSOLUTE ZERO PHOTOGRAPHY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT ROOM 213 52.00 Total : 52.00 6048 2/6/2015 004135 ADMIRE, CHRISTINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 PRE-BALLET FEB CLASS CANCELL 45.00 Total : 45.00 2 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 97.00 2 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 97.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: ,.�1/ L vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 02/06/2015 1:28:00PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34616 2/6/2015 004121 ACADEMY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VF 10.00 Total : 10.00 34617 2/6/2015 004155 AFFORDABLE DENTURES CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT V1 160.00 Total : 160.00 34618 2/6/2015 000101 CDW-G SB66374 001.090.000.518 BROTHER POCKET JET 45.10 Total : 45.10 34619 2/6/2015 003221 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CIP 0199 402.000.199.595 SEPA REVIEW CHARGE FOR STOF 350.00 Total : 350.00 34620 2/6/2015 003221 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CIP 0200 402.000.200.595 SEPA REIVEW FOR STORMWATER 350.00 Total : 350.00 34621 2/6/2015 001888 COMCAST FEBRUARY 2015 001.090.000.518 HIGH SPEED INTERNET CITY HALL 163.03 Total : 163.03 34622 2/6/2015 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 39622479 001.018.014.514 JANUARY 2015: FLEET FUEL BILL 780.46 Total : 780.46 34623 2/6/2015 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST JANUARY 2015 001.076.304.575 ADVERTISING SENIOR CENTER 40.56 Total : 40.56 34624 2/6/2015 004152 EVENT RENTS, LLC 20041-1 001.076.305.575 EVENT SERVICES CENTER PLACE 17.39 Total : 17.39 34625 2/6/2015 001926 FARR, SARAH EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 46.00 Total : 46.00 34626 2/6/2015 003296 FIBERLINK COMMUNICATIONS CORP IN000017708 001.090.000.518 MAAS360 DEVICE MGMTANNUAL I 1,735.20 Total : 1,735.20 34627 2/6/2015 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43211 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 65.45 Total : 65.45 34628 2/6/2015 002235 GRAFOS, DEAN EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSMENT 21.27 Page: �1� vchlist Voucher List Page: —2 02/06/2015 1:28:00PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34628 2/6/2015 002235 002235 GRAFOS, DEAN (Continued) Total : 21.27 34629 2/6/2015 000007 GRAINGER 9645594293 001.090.000.518 SAFETY SUPPLIES FOR CITY FLEE 675.90 Total : 675.90 34630 2/6/2015 000917 GRAYBAR 976952664 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES: FINANCE 196.13 976952666 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES: IT 9.14 977045548 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES: FINANCE 79.41 Total : 284.68 34631 2/6/2015 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 24863 001.011.000.511 FEBRUARY GOVMNTACTION: R. H 20.00 24865 001.011.000.511 FEBRUARY GOVMNTACTION: C. H 20.00 24869 001.011.000.511 FEBRUARY GOVMNTACTION: E. R 20.00 Total : 60.00 34632 2/6/2015 002682 HAFNER, CHARLES EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 48.30 Total : 48.30 34633 2/6/2015 000265 JACKSON, MIKE FEBRUARY 2015 001.013.000.513 AUTO ALLOWANCE 300.00 Total : 300.00 34634 2/6/2015 003959 MAX J KUNEY CO PAY APP 4 303.303.155.595 0155-SULLIVAN RD WEST BRIDGE 101,533.59 Total : 101,533.59 34635 2/6/2015 000696 MITEL BUSINESS SYSTEM INC 91912819 001.090.000.518 MITEL SUPPORT RENEWAL 825.81 Total : 825.81 34636 2/6/2015 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 7005 001.090.000.518 VMWARE SUPPORT RENEWAL 1,190.27 Total : 1,190.27 34637 2/6/2015 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 93951 001.018.016.518 SLOTTED NAMGE BADGE 28.26 93958 001.018.016.518 SLOTTED NAME BADGE 16.85 Total : 45.11 34638 2/6/2015 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 751171702001 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES: FINANCE 58.68 751611721001 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES: IT 161.30 Total : 219.98 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: —4 02/06/2015 1:28:00PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34639 2/6/2015 002243 ORBITCOM 00817384 001.076.305.575 PHONE SERVICE FOR CENTER PL 209.26 Total : 209.26 34640 2/6/2015 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 157543 001.090.000.519 PAPER GENERAL USE 1,459.84 Total : 1,459.84 34641 2/6/2015 000675 RAMAX PRINTING&AWARDS INC 26489 001.013.000.513 NAME PLATES 32.33 Total : 32.33 34642 2/6/2015 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN21714 001.058.057.558 JANUARY 2015 COPIER COSTS 548.25 Total : 548.25 34643 2/6/2015 002835 SCS DELIVERY INC 6299 001.011.000.511 BROADSCASTING COUNCIL SERVI 100.00 Total: 100.00 34644 2/6/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 14500692 001.090.000.566 4TH QTR 2014 LIQUOR EXCISE 4,956.74 Total : 4,956.74 34645 2/6/2015 004153 STARBUCKS COFFEE#3230, SECURITY CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VI- 155.00 Total : 155.00 34646 2/6/2015 001250 SYTE NET SERVICES INC 8158 001.090.000.518 INSTALL CABLING IN SUITE 102 2,553.72 Total : 2,553.72 34647 2/6/2015 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 1282015 001.011.000.511 BROADCASTING COUNCIL MTGS J 1,208.00 Total : 1,208.00 34648 2/6/2015 004154 UNCLE DAN'S SALAD DRESSING CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 25.00 Total : 25.00 34649 2/6/2015 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 9739088316 101.042.000.542 JAN 2015 VERIZON CELL PHONES 1,086.43 9739219399 101.042.000.542 JAN 2015 WIRELESS DATA CARDS 400.12 Total : 1,486.55 34650 2/6/2015 002960 WICK, BEN EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 55.00 Total : 55.00 130510021 1/31/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290200701 001.229.51.13 LAW ENFORCEMENT CONTRACT F 1,547,756.00 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: ?, 02/06/2015 1:28:00PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 130510021 1/31/2015 000001 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER (Continued) Total : 1,547,756.00 205150014 2/5/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER JANUARY 2015 001.016.000.512 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 190,612.97 Total : 190,612.97 37 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 1,860,126.76 37 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 1,860,126.76 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: e vchlist Voucher List Page: I 02/10/2015 4:02:51 PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5043 2/5/2015 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben59285 402.231.15.00 PERS:PAYMENT 74,883.72 Total: 74,883.72 5058 2/5/2015 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben59287 001.231.14.00 401A:PAYMENT 30,845.22 Total: 30,845.22 5059 2/5/2015 000682 EFTPS Ben59289 403.231.12.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 32,868.96 Total: 32,868.96 5060 2/5/2015 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLE Ben59291 303.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:PAYI 7,002.29 Total: 7,002.29 5061 2/5/2015 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC P1 Ben59293 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:PAYMENT 1,172.35 Total: 1,172.35 5073 2/5/2015 000682 EFTPS Ben59297 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 963.57 Total: 963.57 34651 2/5/2015 000120 AWC Ben59281 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS:PAYMENT 115,553.41 Ben59295 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS(COUNCIL):PAYMENT 10,708.99 Total: 126,262.40 34652 2/5/2015 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben59283 001.231.21.00 UNION DUES:PAYMENT 2,577.74 Total: 2,577.74 8 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 276,576.25 8 Vouchers In this report Total vouchers: 276,576.25 Page: �1"'_ vchlist Voucher List Page: --'1' 02/12/2015 4:01:21 PM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6049 2/12/2015 004161 BEREZAY, DENNIS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT ROOM 110 52.00 Total : 52.00 6050 2/12/2015 004163 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST. PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 6051 2/12/2015 004162 ZAYCON FOODS LLC PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREAT ROOM 52.00 Total : 52.00 3 Vouchers for bank code: pk-ref Bank total : 156.00 3 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 156.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: ("r-..-:--' /6 vchlist Voucher List Page: ."-' 02/12/2015 3:06:13PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34653 2/12/2015 004121 ACADEMY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 10.00 Total : 10.00 34654 2/12/2015 004158 ACTION COACH BUSINESS COACHING CSV REFUND 001.000.000.321 CSV ENDORCEMENT REFUND 13.00 Total : 13.00 34655 2/12/2015 000197 AIRFACTZ 101834 001.018.016.518 NEW EMPLOYEE SCREENING 70.00 Total : 70.00 34656 2/12/2015 002931 ALL WESTERN INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY 099826 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 376.32 Total : 376.32 34657 2/12/2015 003860 BILOUS, PAVLO JANUARY2015 001.018.016.518 DATA ALLOWANCE HR INTERN 45.00 Total : 45.00 34658 2/12/2015 002517 BROWN BEARING CO INC 6309616 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 30.80 Total : 30.80 34659 2/12/2015 000673 BUDGET ARBOR&LOGGING LLC 11-2415 101.042.000.542 TREE REMOVAL 869.60 Total : 869.60 34660 2/12/2015 004110 BURKES KLEINS DKI 73304 001.058.056.524 ABATEMENT SERVICES 680.61 Total : 680.61 34661 2/12/2015 000101 CDW-G SF05262 001.090.000.518 BROTHER POCKET JET 6 321.43 Total : 321.43 34662 2/12/2015 000683 DAVID EVANS&ASSOCIATES 352382 001.058.055.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,746.00 Total : 3,746.00 34663 2/12/2015 000235 DB SECURE SHRED 2721020215 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION 161.70 Total : 161.70 34664 2/12/2015 003624 DEHN, SHELLY EXPENSE 001.018.016.518 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 14.95 Total : 14.95 34665 2/12/2015 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 77773829 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( 1,006.63 Page: . vchlist Voucher List Page: 02/12/2015 3:06:13PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34665 2/12/2015 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC (Continued) 77780630 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( 115.29 Total : 1,121.92 34666 2/12/2015 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST DECEMBER 2014 001.076.304.575 SENIOR CENTER ADVERTISING 40.00 Total : 40.00 34667 2/12/2015 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS INC, HRA PLAN 0000518118-IN 001.018.016.518 JANUARY 2015 HRA SERVICE FEE 387.00 Total : 387.00 34668 2/12/2015 000645 ECONORTHWEST 15323 001.058.056.558 PROFESSIOANL SERVICES 970.00 Total : 970.00 34669 2/12/2015 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4233990 101.000.000.542 FUEL FOR MAINT SHOP 3,117.51 Total : 3,117.51 34670 2/12/2015 002255 ENTERPRISE INFO SOLUTIONS INC. 104116 101.000.000.542 HOSTING CHARGE EROADTRACK 5,645.00 Total : 5,645.00 34671 2/12/2015 002075 ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC CD201507592 101.000.000.542 ICE SLICER RS 5,883.53 CD201507593 101.000.000.542 ICE SLICER RS 5,481.48 Total : 11,365.01 34672 2/12/2015 003609 EVERGREEN SAFETY COUNCIL 2015-2016 001.018.016.518 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL CITY 299.00 Total : 299.00 34673 2/12/2015 004160 FLO-2D SOFTWARE INC 1.15.001 001.058.055.558 SUBSCIPTION RENEWAL 2015 995.00 Total : 995.00 34674 2/12/2015 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 124063 001.058.056.558 ADVERTISING COMP PLAN 69.00 124111 001.058.056.558 ADVERTISING COMP PLAN 144.00 43243 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 124.80 43247 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 25.00 43248 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 44.20 43249 001.013.000.513 LEGAL PUBLICATION 34.85 Total : 441.85 34675 2/12/2015 001911 GLOVER MANSION&, RED ROCK CATEF CP1586 001.058.056.558 EVENT SERVICES COMP PLAN 252.24 Page: ,2"---- 4:2— vchlist Voucher List Page: —4 02/12/2015 3:06:13PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34675 2/12/2015 001911 GLOVER MANSION &, RED ROCK CATEF (Continued) CP1587 001.058.056.558 EVENT SERVICES COMP PLAN 252.24 Total : 504.48 34676 2/12/2015 001253 GORDON THOMAS HONEYWELL JAN15 1042 001.011.000.511 LOBBYIST SERVICES JANUARY 3,431.66 Total : 3,431.66 34677 2/12/2015 000011 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY 24938 001.011.000.511 BUSINESS CONNECTION LUNCH 90.00 Total : 90.00 34678 2/12/2015 000692 GUS JOHNSON FORD 821003 101.000.000.542 5-202: SERVICE 79.60 Total : 79.60 34679 2/12/2015 003177 GUTH, ERIC EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 36.80 Total : 36.80 34680 2/12/2015 002520 HUSKY INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 115710 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 120.92 115899 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 101.84 116072 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 318.99 CMI15710 101.000.000.542 CREDIT MEMO SUPPLIES PW -60.46 Total : 481.29 34681 2/12/2015 002518 INLAND PACIFIC HOSE&FITINGS 521561 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 49.82 521562 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 27.45 Total : 77.27 34682 2/12/2015 003697 INTEGRA 12716936 001.090.000.586 INTERNET SERVICE SCRAPS FEB 88.48 Total : 88.48 34683 2/12/2015 001987 JENKINS,ART EXPENSE 402.402.000.531 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 21.95 Total : 21.95 34684 2/12/2015 001944 LANCER LTD 0451034 001.058.055.558 BUSINESS CARDS 82.46 Total : 82.46 34685 2/12/2015 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 499 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 156.00 Total : 156.00 Page: L3 vchlist Voucher List Page: "1 02/12/2015 3:06:13PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34686 2/12/2015 002364 NORTHEND TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC 1030793 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 303.89 Total : 303.89 34687 2/12/2015 002510 POHL SPRING WORKS INC 164501 101.000.000.542 5-209: SERVICE 1,866.09 Total : 1,866.09 34688 2/12/2015 000019 PURRFECT LOGOS INC. 41117 001.058.050.558 PLANNING COMISSION SIGNS 48.92 Total : 48.92 34689 2/12/2015 000675 RAMAX PRINTING&AWARDS INC 26457 001.058.057.558 NAME PLATE 19.84 Total : 19.84 34690 2/12/2015 000952 RECALL DESTRUCTION SVC 3901170436 001.058.057.558 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION-PC 35.36 Total : 35.36 34691 2/12/2015 002616 ROADWISE INC 55645 101.000.000.542 FREEZGARD ZERO 5,693.92 55646 101.000.000.542 FREEZGARD ZERO 5,693.92 55647 101.000.000.542 FREEZGARD ZERO 5,695.58 Total : 17,083.42 34692 2/12/2015 000415 ROSAUERS FOOD&DRUG CENTER 10-487771 001.058.050.558 SUPPLIES FOR COMMISSION MEE 19.99 Total : 19.99 34693 2/12/2015 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 5900021 101.042.000.542 ON-CALL EMERGENCY TRAFFIC C 530.46 Total : 530.46 34694 2/12/2015 002531 SIX ROBBLEES INC 5-724794-2 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 27.54 5-725481 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 63.22 5-725589 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 49.40 Total : 140.16 34695 2/12/2015 000779 SOUTHARD, BRAD JANAURY 2015 101.042.000.542 DEAD ANIMAL REMOVAL SERVICE: 1,960.00 Total : 1,960.00 34696 2/12/2015 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE JANUARY 2015 001.058.056.558 RECORDING FEES 515.00 Total : 515.00 34697 2/12/2015 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. 424485 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 59.35 Page: ,/gi vchlist Voucher List Page: 02/12/2015 3:06:13PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34697 2/12/2015 002540 002540 SPOKANE HOUSE OF HOSE INC. (Continued) Total : 59.35 34698 2/12/2015 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3253227089 001.058.050.558 SUPPLIES:CD 33.46 3253227091 001.058.050.558 SUPPLIES:CD 32.90 3253227092 001.058.050.558 SUPPLIES: CD 6.92 3253227093 001.058.050.558 SUPPLIES:CD 27.12 Total : 100.40 34699 2/12/2015 003431 THE PIN CENTER 0215003 001.011.000.511 LAPEL PINS 269.50 Total : 269.50 34700 2/12/2015 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 417636 001.058.056.558 ADVERTISING ACCOUNT 9013993 471.34 Total : 471.34 34701 2/12/2015 003206 VAN NESS FELDMAN LLP 116851 001.058.099.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,780.08 Total : 12,780.08 34702 2/12/2015 000140 WALT'S MAILING SERVICE LTD 44545 001.090.000.518 POSTAGE SERVICE FOR COMP PL 3,011.14 Total : 3,011.14 34703 2/12/2015 000676 WEST-THOMAS REUTERS 831208080 001.013.015.515 WEST INFORMATION CHARGES 743.69 Total : 743.69 34704 2/12/2015 000255 WFOA 1678141-78061481 001.018.014.514 WFOA TRAINING:TAYLOR, NIMRI 250.00 Total : 250.00 34705 2/12/2015 001694 WSAFM 2015 001.058.056.524 2015 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: B. ; 90.00 Total : 90.00 34706 2/12/2015 001885 ZAYO GROUP LLC FEBRUARY 2015 001.090.000.518 HIGH SPEED INTERNET CITY HALL 569.14 FEBRUARY 2015 B 101.042.000.542 DARK FIBER LEASE 409.41 Total : 978.55 54 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 77,048.87 54 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 77,048.87 Page: --5 /16/./ vchlist Voucher List Page: ^I 02/13/2015 11:26:59AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34707 2/13/2015 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9613488 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 296.12 9615511 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY ATC 130.15 S0100089 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY ATC 17.19 S0100182 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY ATC 24.72 Total : 468.18 34708 2/13/2015 001169 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY January 2015 001.058.056.558 PETTY CASH: 12382,83,84,85, 10.48 Total : 10.48 34709 2/13/2015 000109 COFFEE SYSTEMS INC 106882 001.076.305.575 COFFEE SERVICE AT CENTERPLA' 170.12 Total : 170.12 34710 2/13/2015 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 35009 001.076.305.575 RECYCLING COLLECTION CP 20.00 Total : 20.00 34711 2/13/2015 002308 FINKE, MELISSA 2015 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTION PAYMENT 780.00 2015 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PMT 230.10 Total : 1,010.10 34712 2/13/2015 000321 GREATER SPOKANE INC 101314 001.076.305.575 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES: CEI\ 700.00 Total : 700.00 34713 2/13/2015 000441 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES January 2015 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW/MAINT AND GENER 161.17 Total : 161.17 34714 2/13/2015 000070 INLAND POWER& LIGHT CO 94202 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:JAN 2015PW 2.90 Total : 2.90 34715 2/13/2015 001944 LANCER LTD 0450898 001.076.305.575 BUSINESS CARDS TINA GREGERS 54.07 Total : 54.07 34716 2/13/2015 000132 MODERN ELECTRIC WATER CO 04500-01 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:JANUARY 2015: PW 8,477.01 Total : 8,477.01 34717 2/13/2015 000193 NORTHWEST CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC January 2015 001.090.000.518 CITY HALL RENT 34,000.00 Total : 34,000.00 Page: 1 /4 vchlist Voucher List Page: 02/13/2015 11:26:59AM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 34718 2/13/2015 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY F977717 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 97.19 Total : 97.19 34719 2/13/2015 003469 SKYLINE INLAND NW SPKQ5124 001.076.305.575 CENTERPLACE BANNER STAND H, 214.27 Total : 214.27 34720 2/13/2015 000731 SPOKANE RESTAURANT EQUIP INC 58015 001.076.305.575 KITCHEN ITEMS FOR CENTERPLA' 330.50 Total : 330.50 34721 2/13/2015 002212 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS 12086436 001.016.000.521 PRECINCT: SVC/LABOR FOR SECT 263.06 Total : 263.06 34722 2/13/2015 002306 TERRELL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, MIC 2209 309.000.203.594 0203-ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 5,176.10 Total : 5,176.10 34723 2/13/2015 003175 VISIT SPOKANE 6923 001.076.305.575 TRADESHOW PARTICIPATION 500.00 Total : 500.00 34724 2/13/2015 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0043527-2681-6 101.042.000.543 WASTE MGMT: MAINT SHOP 172.94 0044311-2681-4 001.076.305.575 WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE 740.31 0044312-2681-2 001.016.000.521 WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT 282.62 Total : 1,195.87 34725 2/13/2015 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 8881351 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 67.76 Total : 67.76 19 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 52,918.78 19 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 52,918.78 Page: -2 r2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 0211812015 9:35:29AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund!Dept Description/Account Amount 10 2/20/2015 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS INC,HRA PLAN Ben59477 001.231.28.00 HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ACCOUNT: 1,200.00 Total: 1,200.00 5074 2/20/2015 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben59479 001.231.14.00 401A:PAYMENT 30,340.48 Total: 30,340.48 5075 2/20/2015 000682 EFTPS Ben59481 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 31,244.51 Total: 31,244.51 5077 2/20/2015 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PU Ben59483 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:PAYI 7,123.47 Total: 7,123.47 5078 2/20/2015 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben59485 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:PAYMENT 1,172.35 Total: 1,172.35 34726 2/20/2015 002227 IDAHO TAX COMMISSION Ben59475 001.231.50.03 IDAHO STATE TAX BASE:PAYMENT 837.24 Total: 837.24 6 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 71,918.05 6 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 71,918.05 Page: ...--1- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 02-24-2015 Department Director Approval : El Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending February 15, 2015 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 257,299.29 $ - $257,299.29 Benefits: $ 47,655.34 $ - $ 47,655.34 Total payroll $ 304,954.63 $ - $304,954.63 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington February 3, 2015 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Cary Driskell,City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Ed Pace, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney ABSENT: Gloria Mantz,Development Engineer Bill Bates,Councilmember Mike Basinger, Senior Planner Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Bates from tonight's meeting. 1. Public Works Bid Process—Steve Worley Engineer Worley explained that Council previously requested information on the Public Works bid process and how it relates to City projects; and through use of his PowerPoint, explained about the two categories of bids: small works and formal; the amounts which trigger when to bid public works projects; and how the public bids are processed, tabulated and eventually presented to Council for award consideration. Mr. Worley also showed some examples of some previous bid errors and how those are addressed. Council thanked Mr. Worley for the information. 2. Historic Preservation—Gloria Mantz,Mike Basinger Development Engineer Mantz explained that there are several steps in connection with establishing a local historic preservation program, and via her PowerPoint explained about the historic preservation ordinance,bringing Council's attention to the "model" ordinance,mentioned the purpose of the ordinance, the establishing of an Historic Commission, the historic register, and local tax incentives; she went over the process for our City to become a "Certified Local Government" (CLG) and what responsibilities are associated with being a CLG; she went over the benefits of a CLG, and the roles and responsibilities of Council, the Historic Commission and the Community and Economic Development staff, including the workload anticipated with running such a program. Ms. Mantz explained the three options: (1) City staff runs the entire program; (2) through a services contract, a consultant would provide technical support, or (3)through an interlocal agreement,have the City of Spokane provide technical support. Concerning the fees listed on slide 14, Councilmember Pace asked what our fees might be, and Ms. Mantz replied that those fees are what the City of Spokane charges the County, and that any fees we set Council Study Session:02-03-2015 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT would be at Council's discretion. A question came up about changing properties that are on the register, and Ms. Mantz explained that the state provides standards and guidelines for review of any changes that might occur concerning registered properties. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked if the City could declare a property historic, and Ms. Mantz responded yes, but with the consent of the owner, which is required in order for the property to be on the register; and she emphasized that language in our ordinance would include that the owner must consent to be part of an historic register. The question came up about removing properties on a register, or changing the property or demolishing the building on the property, and Mr. Jackson noted that the verbiage can be drafted to tailor to Council's wishes, such as that the property owner has the ability to decide if the building gets removed from the register. Councilmember Pace also asked about "figuring out the building code thing" concerning which building code would apply to any change to a building, and Ms. Mantz said she will need to research that further. Mayor Grafos said an ordinance could be beneficial to and give a property owner leverage if the building were on the register, it would be reviewed and might not have to meet some of those codes, or perhaps could even have a determination appealed. Mr. Jackson said further research would be needed in that area as we would have limited ability; that the state has some exceptions in consideration of buildings, but we will have to look at the full extent of what could be done as there are certain limitations on what building codes could be waived. 3. E-Cigarettes—Cary Driskell City Attorney Driskell said staff was asked to research the issue of age concerning use of e-cigarettes, and whether that age should be raised to 21. Mr. Driskell explained that there has not been much work done on a state or federal level regarding e-cigarettes relative to health issues; but said there is the concern that that if the age for e-cigarettes were changed to 21 while tobacco remains at 18, that might move people toward smoking tobacco and away from e-cigarettes, and he suggested using caution on any change. Mr. Driskell said that the Washington State Attorney General had introduced a bill for tobacco and e- cigarettes that if passed,would raise the age for use on those products from 18 to 21; he said it is not clear what might happen with this bill, and staff recommends waiting to see how it progresses before making any change to our City Code.Mr. Jackson asked Council if they support raising the age for use of tobacco and/or e-cigarettes, to 21. After brief discussion about enforcement, and possible use by those in the military who are under 21 years of age; it was determined that we will wait to see what, if any change the state will propose. 4. Proposed 2015 Legislative Session Marijuana Bills—Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney Lamb explained that tonight is an opportunity to hear and discuss some of the legislatively proposed marijuana bills; he said our Lobbyist Briahna Taylor provides weekly updates to Council on numerous bills; that so far, nineteen bills have been introduced this year and they seem to change daily; and of those nineteen, two or three are of primary interest to us, adding that he tries to watch those bills as much as possible. Some of the proposed legislation discussed by Mr. Lamb included SB 5052 (Senate Bill) and 5519, which are programs to reconcile both medical and recreational marijuana; he said HB (House Bill) 1461 is an omnibus bill that attempts to combine all eighteen of the other house bills that were introduced;he said hearings have been conducted on some of these bills and as bills are introduced, it becomes apparent there are conflicting provisions. Mr. Lamb said the issue of reconciling recreational and medical marijuana is the most prime; that 5052 and 5519 were originally introduced as two different methods to reconcile marijuana, with 5052 creating two store types to keep the two systems separate. Bill 5519, Mr. Lamb explained had originally combined everything into the 502-stores and the retail stores could apply for an endorsement to provide medical grade marijuana and get the tax exemption; but since the bill was introduced, a substitute bill 5052 was introduced to eliminate the two store system, so now we are back to looking at a single system using the 502-retail stores with the medical endorsement; and he said it appears that the 5052 bill is the agreed-upon vehicle; and that it includes an increase in the requirements concerning how one becomes a qualified patient; and said both Council Study Session:02-03-2015 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT the bill and its substitute bill would allow minors access to medical marijuana, with restrictions based on age and information concerning when the parent has to make the purchase; he said both bills would reset the number of retail stores as they feel there will be an increased demand because of the medical marijuana; and it also provides that anyone can grow up to six plants at their home. Collective gardens, which Mr. Lamb said is the current method for medical, would be eliminated under both bills in about a year or more in order to allow time for the medical shop's rules to be developed and endorsements to be issued. Mr. Lamb said 5052 would allow the creation of cooperatives, which are similar to collective gardens,but more restrictive with only allowing four instead of the ten patients. Concerning HB 1461,the omnibus bill that combines the eighteen other house bills, Mr. Lamb said legislators just cut and pasted, but it does include strengthening the definition of a "public place" for where marijuana could be consumed; he said it allows flexibility for local governments to modify the buffers and said we want to watch that bill to make sure the state doesn't eliminate the buffers we imposed. Mr. Lamb said that hearings are scheduled for today and yesterday so we can expect more changes. City Manager Jackson said he was informed by Lobbyist Briahna Taylor that she signed our City in concerning bill 1461 to recommend adding language to that bill about cannabis vaping and underage consumption. Mr. Jackson said there are many bills, some complex, and that Ms. Taylor will try to sign in and use our relevant "talking points" connected with our own Legislative Agenda, and which are part of tonight's Council packet; said he assumes Council wants to retain its legislative authority concerning marijuana bills, and said if Council concurs, Ms. Taylor will oppose anything that would take away any local authority; adding that it has become apparent that the possibility of eliminating medical marijuana is very slim; and said the main message is that Ms. Taylor will use these "talking points" at every opportunity, and Council concurred. 5. 2015 Street Sweeping Services Bid Results—Eric Guth As noted in his Request for Council Action, Mr. Guth explained that the previous agreement for street sweeping services was a one-year contract with AAA Sweeping, with six, one-year renewal options; and that the last of those options expired at the end of 2014. Mr. Guth explained that staff prepared a request for bid, and that specifications from the previous bid were evaluated and updated to add the ability to use a vacuum sweeper in certain circumstances, included a line item for use of a foreman during spring and fall work, discontinued the kick-broom sweeper requirement, and called for an initial agreement with up to four, one-year renewal options; which he said is the same term as the street and stormwater maintenance contract. Regarding previous bike lane discussions, he said a high efficiency vacuum sweeper was added to the fleet which is good for the curb line where most of the smaller particles collect; that the use of a foreman will be at an hourly rate so we can determine when that foreman would be used. Mr. Guth explained that the bid opening was January 23, 2015, and the only bid proposal submitted was from AAA Sweeping;he said they have done a good job in the past,they have the equipment, and that the contract will be brought to Council at the February 10 meeting for motion consideration. Mr. Guth also noted that AAA Sweeping's bid was $489,979.50, and comparing that with the engineer's estimate of $487,906.85, represents a very small difference of.4%. Mr. Guth said that the budgeted amount for this service has been the same amount since 2009; that staff can also control how many hours we use their services.Mr. Guth said the fall sweep has also been refined as staff looks at aerial photos to see where the service is needed, followed by actual viewing of the areas in the field. Council concurred to bring this back next week for approval consideration. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda. 7. Council Comments—Mayor Grafos There were no additional Council comments. Council Study Session:02-03-2015 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT 8. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson City Manager Jackson said that yesterday the County Auditor recorded our acquisition of the property at the corner of Sprague and Dartmouth; and that next steps to move forward with our new City Hall project include revising the qualifications for architects. Concerning our Legislative Agenda, he said there is a hearing set for Monday on our proposed code lien legislation, which is now designated as Senate Bill 5694, and which is sponsored by Senators Padden and Baumgartner; said the City Attorney will be attending the hearing and he asked if any Councilmembers would be interested in attending,realizing that we have a meeting with the Board of County Commissioners on Monday as well.Mr. Jackson mentioned some of the legislation in the Association of Washington Cities' bulletin, including proposed Senate Bill 5624 to eliminate the Public Works Trust Fund, which provides assistance to small and medium jurisdictions to get loans for projects. Mr. Jackson said he feels that legislation will not likely move forward. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 7:24 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Council Study Session:02-03-2015 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday,February 10,2015 Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff: Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell,City Attorney Chuck Hafner, Councilmember John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Rod Higgins, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Rec Director Ed Pace, Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Karen Kendall,Planner ABSENT: Rick VanLeuven,Police Chief Bill Bates, Councilmember Carolbelle Branch,Public Information Officer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: In the absence of a pastor, a few moments of silence were observed. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Council, Staff, and audience rose for the Pledge of Allegiance ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmembers Bates from tonight's meeting. Mayor Grafos explained that Councilmember Bates has been ill and in the hospital and is recovering, and would like to participate via phone in next week's Council meeting/workshop, and that as provided in the Council's Governance Manual,requests to use telephone conference participation shall be approved by the Council by motion. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve Councilmember Bates'request to participate by telephone in next week's Council meeting/workshop. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: n/a COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS: Deputy Mayor Woodard: said he attended the morning meeting for the City's visioning process for our comprehensive plan; said it was well attended with lots of public input. Councilmember Wick: reported that he has been invited to join the Safe Energy Leadership Alliance, which is a coalition of local state and tribal leaders from across the Pacific Northwest, Montana and Canada who are working to raise awareness of the safety risks of oil and coal trains and their economic, cultural, environmental and health impacts; and said through that process, he will continue to try to advance our Bridging the Valley concept and the safety issues for our side of the state, and said the next meeting will be in Portland; reported that the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council) upcoming grants will be more geared toward air quality, and that because we have a lot of sidewalks and bike and trails,it will be difficult to compete against air quality,and that he would like to recommend use of 50%of those funds for bike/pedestrian uses, and Council appeared to nod in agreement. Minutes Regular Council Meeting:02-10-2015 Page 1 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Hafner: spoke about the medical marijuana tax and revenues and said cities should continue putting pressure on the legislators that cities receive a portion of those revenues; as the Chair of the Health District Board,reported that there have been twelve confirmed influenza related deaths in our county out of the ninety-two reported throughout the state, and said the Board works hard to keep people informed; and mentioned yesterday's City Council and County Commissioners joint meeting. Councilmember Pace: said that the STA (Spokane Transit Authority) meeting included a request from members of the Greater Valley Support Network to examine bus stops and routes; said he went to the Spokane Valley Tech school to help judge student projects and met with his four interns who are acting as legislative aids; attended yesterday's City/County meeting; went to the Chamber of Commerce Government Action meeting; and attended both sessions of the Comprehensive Plan Community Visioning forums. Councilmember Higgins: reported that he attended last Thursday's Spokane Regional Clean Air meeting where the major problem was a leak in the roof and no money to pay for it, but they had a coloring and game book, which he said is not the usual biased propaganda for an agency of that type; and that he went to Olympia yesterday and extended thanks to Senator Padden for sponsoring our lien authority bill. MAYOR'S REPORT: Mayor Grafos said he also attended both comprehensive plan community visioning meetings; attended the City's finance committee meeting; went to the Chamber's annual Gala event at Mirabeau; attended the awards banquet for Fire District 8; and also participated in yesterday's joint meeting with the County where elected officials talked about economic development, and that we would like to see extended sewer lines in our industrial park, and he mentioned the controversial sports field house project, and that the City of Spokane wants that facility downtown, and said we don't necessarily agree. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Grafos invited public comment. Michele Yarborough: said she lives at the bottom of a steep hill on 8th and Carnahan; that the person who bought the field across the street from her has been a problem; that her driveway is 12' from the stop sign and with a 6' wooden fence, you can't see traffic; said she asked her neighborhood not to park in such a manner as to block her driveway,but that continues to be a problem; said she called the police who said it is a public street and there is nothing they can do about it; she said it is a very dangerous corner and people have come down and run into their fence about seven times and she would like some kind of a barrier to keep her and her property safe; and that she was told she cannot put rocks or barriers outside her fence. Chuck Simpson: said he lives in the Broadway Argonne area; spoke about a duplex that burnt down about two years ago; and that the area is a big problem; to the north and back property line there is a mess with building materials, and it is a health hazard, and he asked if there is any way to get that area cleaned up; and he gave some photos to the Clerk to share with Council. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately. Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of claim vouchers on Feb 10,2015 Request for Council Action Form,Totaling:$2,213,740.66 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending January 31,2015: $427,002.09 c.Approval of January 27,2015 Council Formal Meeting Minutes It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. Minutes Regular Council Meeting:02-10-2015 Page 2 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT NEW BUSINESS: 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-002 Adopting Moratorium Findings of Fact—Erik Lamb After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to advance Ordinance 15-002 adopting findings of fact for Ordinance 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses, to a second reading. After Deputy City Attorney Lamb gave an overview of the ordinance,Mayor Grafos invited public comment.No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-003 for Plat Time Extension—John Hohman/Micki Harnois After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to advance Ordinance 15-003, changing the regulations regarding preliminary plat time extensions, to a second reading. After Director Hohman gave an overview of the ordinance, Mayor Grafos invited public comment. Chuck Simpson: said due to the economy,he thinks it should be extended about as long as it can,that the initial three-year extension is ok,but would favor four or five years. There were no other comments. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 4.Motion Consideration: Street Sweeping Contract—Eric Guth It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to award the 2015 Street Sweeping Services to AAA Sweeping, LLC for an initial contract amount not to exceed $490,200 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute a contract for the services. Director Guth gave a brief overview of the contract being proposed as noted in his February 10, 2015 Request for Council Action. Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS: 5. Old Mission Avenue Street Vacation(STV 2014-0001)—Karen Kendall Via her PowerPoint presentation, Planner Kendall explained the proposed street vacation request of 3,688 square feet and showed the property on the aerial map. Ms. Kendall noted that the Planning Commission recommends approval with conditions, all as noted on her PowerPoint slides; and said that staff feels compensation is not justified, with Mr. Jackson adding although that is staffs recommendation, and that the decision is within Council's discretion. There were no objections from Council to move this forward to a first reading. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos There were no proposed changes to the Advance Agenda. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Mr. Jackson noted next week's workshop draft agenda which he placed at the Council dais, and asked if Council has any comments,to please let him know by tomorrow. Mr. Jackson then asked Mr. Driskell to give a brief update on his visit to Olympia yesterday. Concerning SB 5694, Mr. Driskell said he and Councilmember Higgins testified at a hearing before the governing operations committee, and then with eight individual legislators, and said Lobbyist Briahna Taylor kept them busy; he said he feels the discussions were productive and putting a cap in the bill along with including language that such lien has to be based on health or safety risks were very persuasive arguments; said the bill must be out of committee by February 20. Mr. Driskell said they also spoke to individual legislators about our concerns with the marijuana legislation, and he feels they were successful and the legislators will be working on some of the issues identified and said he hopes to see some progress in the near future, adding that several bills are moving between the House and Senate. Mr. Jackson noted that they have been very involved in the legislative session so far, and that they have scheduled several appointments for next week. Mr. Jackson asked, and Council confirmed their desire on whether or not to support the following proposed bills: (1) SB 5628 regarding stormwater flood control Minutes Regular Council Meeting:02-10-2015 Page 3 of 4 Approved by Council: DRAFT and water supply infrastructure fees: does not support; (2) SB 5866 regarding counties imposing sales tax up to .3%: does not support; and(3) HB 1133 to allow counties to impose a utility tax up to 6% and if a city doesn't have one,the County could charge it—like solid waste: does not support. Mr. Jackson noted that Council will continue to get periodic updates on the bills as the issues evolve. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting:02-10-2015 Page 4 of 4 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance No. 15-002 - adopting findings of fact for Ordinance No. 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on all marijuana uses other than those licensed by the Washington Liquor Control Board GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.390; RCW 69.50 (Initiative 502 has been codified as RCW 69.50) and WAC 314-55; RCW 69.51A; SVMC Title 19. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Staff has provided numerous administrative reports on the legalization of marijuana since March, 2013. City Council adopted regulations regarding restrictions on recreational marijuana on July 22, 2014. City Council adopted a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana use on December 9, 2014 and conducted a public hearing on Ordinance No. 14-021 and the moratorium on January 27, 2015. City Council conducted a first reading on proposed Ordinance No. 15-002 on February 10, 2015. BACKGROUND: After the passage of Initiative 502 (1-502) in 2012, the City engaged in an extended process to review the impact and implications of the legalization of recreational marijuana. The City adopted interim regulations in February 2014 and adopted final regulations on July 22, 2014 governing the siting, zoning, and restrictions on recreational marijuana production, processing, and retail sales licensed by the Washington Liquor Control Board (LCB). In addition to 1-502 and recreational marijuana, RCW 69.51A, which was initially passed as an initiative in 1998, provides a structure for qualified patients to obtain a medical marijuana card that permits them to obtain, possess and use medical marijuana. In 2011, the Legislature attempted to fully legalize medical marijuana dispensaries and provide a State registry for qualified patients, collective gardens, and designated providers. However, Governor Gregoire vetoed all sections that would have created legalized medical marijuana dispensaries and the State registry, thereby leaving an uncertain structure in place for medical marijuana. As it currently stands, RCW 69.51A does not permit legal dispensaries and provides an affirmative defense to qualified patients, designated providers, and collective gardens. There is no licensing of any medical marijuana by the LCB as there is for recreational marijuana under I- 502. 1-502 further made it illegal to consume marijuana in view of the general public. However, there are apparent gaps that allow private consumption businesses to operate. These businesses are not regulated or licensed by the LCB. In 2014, the Legislature considered, but did not pass, a bill that would have reconciled both recreational and medical marijuana. Staff expects that the Legislature will consider numerous aspects of marijuana laws in the current legislative session, including the reconciliation of medical and recreational marijuana. At least two bills have already been proposed to reconcile medical and recreational marijuana during the current legislative session. While the City considered and adopted regulations governing recreational marijuana, it did not initially adopt regulations related to medical marijuana due to the uncertainty surrounding the potential for State regulations and to the uncertain status of medical marijuana under RCW 69.51 A. With the lack of regulatory oversight and significant gaps in State law over medical marijuana and private consumption lounges, staff determined there exists the strong potential for abuse of the medical marijuana market. There has been an increase in the number of medical marijuana business registration applications in 2014 as well as a broadening of the scope of activities sought. The City Council adopted an item in its 2015-2017 Legislative Agenda indicating it would support State legislation over the reconciliation of medical and recreational marijuana, additional regulations over private marijuana consumption businesses, and regulations governing underage marijuana consumption. Given the uncertainty surrounding marijuana uses that are not currently licensed by the LCB, the lack of regulation over such uses, and the shift towards more medical marijuana activities, staff believed a moratorium was appropriate on all marijuana uses that are not licensed or regulated by the LCB in order to allow the City to research appropriate final regulations, up to and including bans over such unlicensed marijuana uses, to limit the potential for abuse of such uses, and to further limit the potential for access of marijuana to minors. Further, a moratorium allows the City to determine what, if any, laws the Legislature might adopt in 2015 and the impact of those laws on the City. RCW 36.70A.390 authorizes the City to adopt a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses without conducting a public hearing and without utilizing the City's standard approval process through the Planning Commission, and multiple readings by City Council. A moratorium preserves the status quo so that new plans and regulations will not be rendered moot by intervening development. After adoption of the moratorium, the City Council must conduct a public hearing on the moratorium within 60 days and adopt findings of fact for the moratorium. Additionally, pursuant to state law, a moratorium that includes a work plan may be effective for up to 365 days from the date of adoption. After adoption of the moratorium, final regulations must be proposed and processed through the City's standard process, including a proposal to the Planning Commission, Planning Commission recommendation to City Council, and multiple readings by City Council. The final regulations must be adopted prior to the expiration of the moratorium. Pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.70A.390, on December 9, 2014, the City Council considered and adopted Ordinance No. 14-021, which established a moratorium on the submission, processing, modification, or approval of any permit applications or licenses by or for unlicensed marijuana use. Unlicensed marijuana use is defined as all marijuana use other than recreational marijuana production, processing, or retail sales licensed by the LCB and so includes all new medical marijuana dispensaries, collective gardens, and designated providers, and all private marijuana consumption businesses. The moratorium does not apply to personal use or personal medical use by qualified patients. The moratorium became effective upon approval by the City Council (on December 9, 2014), so it did not and does not impact the continued operation of existing businesses. The moratorium set January 27, 2015 as the date for a public hearing, established a work plan, adopted preliminary findings of fact, and established an effective period of up to 365 days for the moratorium. Finally, Ordinance No. 14- 021 was designated as a public emergency and was effective upon adoption. Staff has completed SEPA review of the moratorium and a Determination of Non-Significance ("DNS") was issued on December 19, 2014. No comments were received on the DNS. On January 27, 2015, City Council conducted a public hearing on Ordinance 14-021 and the moratorium. Council received three written comments and received 18 comments from the public at the public hearing. Pursuant to state law, staff is now presenting findings of fact on Ordinance 14-021 and the moratorium for Council consideration based on the public hearing and information received. OPTIONS: Move to approve the proposed ordinance, with or without amendments; or take further action as deemed appropriate. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance No. 15-002 adopting findings of fact for Ordinance 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A. STAFF CONTACT: Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 15-002; Ordinance No. 14-021 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 15-002 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT JUSTIFYING THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 14-021 AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MORATORIUM ON ALL MARIJUANA USES OTHER THAN MARIJUANA PRODUCERS, MARIJUANA PROCESSORS, AND MARIJUANA RETAIL SALES AS LICENSED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 69.50 RCW AND REGULATED BY CHAPTER 19.85 SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.120.050,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11, Section 11 of the Washington Constitution, the City of Spokane Valley is authorized to "make and enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws," which includes the adoption of regulations governing land uses within the City; and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 provides that "A county or city governing body that adopts a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control without holding a public hearing on the proposed moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control, shall hold a public hearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, whether or not the governing body received a recommendation on the matter from the planning commission or department. If the governing body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the governing body shall do so immediately after this public hearing. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control adopted under this section may be effective for not longer than six months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related studies providing such a longer period. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance or interim official control may be renewed for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal;" and WHEREAS, a moratorium enacted under RCW 35A.63.220 and/or RCW 36.70A.390 is a method by which local governments may preserve the status quo so that new plans and regulations will not be rendered moot by intervening development; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 both authorize the enactment of a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control prior to holding a public hearing, provided the City conducts a public hearing on the moratorium within 60 days of the date of adoption of the moratorium; and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, on December 9, 2014, the City adopted Ordinance No. 14-021 establishing a moratorium upon the submission, acceptance, processing,modification or approval of any permit applications or licenses by or for unlicensed marijuana use;and WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220, RCW 36.70A.390 and Ordinance No. 14-021, on January 27, 2015, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the adoption of Ordinance No. 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses; and WHEREAS, written public testimony was received from three interested parties. City Council heard testimony from 18 interested parties during the public hearing; and Ordinance 15-002 Page 1 of 5 DRAFT WHEREAS,pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, the City Council is required to adopt findings of fact after conducting the public hearing. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Findings of Fact. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, on January 27, 2015, the City Council conducted a public hearing on Ordinance No. 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses. The City Council hereby adopts the following as findings of fact in support of Ordinance No. 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses: 1. Since 1970, federal law has prohibited the manufacture and possession of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, based on the federal government's categorization of marijuana as having a "high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical use, and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment." Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005); Controlled Substance Act, 84 Stat. 1242,21 U.S.C. 801 et seq. 2. Initiative Measure No. 692, approved by the voters of Washington State on November 3, 1998, and now codified as chapter 69.51A RCW, created an affirmative defense for"qualifying patients" to the charge of possession of marijuana. 3. In 2011, the Washington State Legislature considered and passed ESSSB 5073 that, among other things, (1) authorized the licensing of medical cannabis dispensaries, production facilities, and processing facilities; (2) permitted qualifying patients to receive certain amounts of marijuana for medicinal purposes from designated providers; (3) permitted collective gardens by qualifying patients whereby they may, consistent with state law, collectively grow marijuana for their own use; and (4) clarified that cities were authorized to continue to use their zoning authority to regulate the production, processing, or dispensing of marijuana under ESSSB 5073 and chapter 69.51A RCW within their respective jurisdictions. 4. On April 29, 2011, former governor Christine Gregoire vetoed the portions of ESSSB 5073 that would have provided the legal basis for legalizing and licensing medical cannabis dispensaries, processing facilities, and production facilities,thereby making these activities illegal. 5. On November 6,2012,voters of the State of Washington approved Initiative Measure No. 502 ("I-502"), now codified in chapters 69.50, 46.04, 46.20, 46.21, and 46.61 Revised Code of Washington ("RCW"), which provisions (1) decriminalized possession and use of certain amounts of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia; (2) amended state laws pertaining to driving under the influence of intoxicants to include driving under the influence of marijuana; and (3) established a regulatory system licensing producers, processors, and retailers of recreational marijuana for adults 21 years of age and older, and required the Washington State Liquor Control Board (the "LCB") to adopt procedures and criteria by December 1,2013 for issuing licenses to produce,process, and sell marijuana. 6. On August 29, 2013, the United States Department of Justice issued a memo providing updated guidance on marijuana enforcement in response to the adoption of I-502. Several ongoing federal enforcement priorities were outlined, including prevention of crime and preventing distribution of marijuana to minors. Further, the memo provided that the Department would not seek ongoing prosecution of marijuana providers,users, and local officials in states that authorized marijuana,provided that those state and local governments "implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public health, and other law enforcement interests. A system adequate to that task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be effective in practice." Ordinance 15-002 Page 2 of 5 DRAFT 7. The LCB has established a comprehensive regulatory scheme for the licensing, operation, and enforcement of recreational marijuana production,processing, and retail sales shops under chapter 314-55 WAC. 8. In 2014, the Washington State Legislature considered, but did not adopt E3SSB 5887 that would have reconciled the comprehensive state regulatory scheme for recreational marijuana under I-502 and the lack of regulatory oversight and controls over medical marijuana under chapter 69.51A RCW. 9. The possession of medical marijuana, operation of collective gardens, and services provided by designated providers remain illegal under chapter 69.51A RCW and Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent, 180 Wn. App. 455 (2014), review granted, 336 P.3d 1165 (2014), with such activities only entitled to an affirmative defense. 10. RCW 69.50.445 prohibits the opening of a package containing marijuana,useable marijuana, or a marijuana-infused product, or consumption of marijuana, useable marijuana, or a marijuana-infused product "within view of the general public," but does not otherwise regulate operation of any "private" marijuana consumption facility, "vaping" of marijuana extracts or oils, or other unlicensed marijuana operations. 11. On July 22, 2014, the City adopted Ordinance No. 14-008, which established in chapter 19.85 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code ("SVMC") and SVMC 19.120.050 regulations, zoning, buffers, and other limitations on marijuana producers,processors, and retail sellers licensed under chapter 69.50 RCW,but which did not regulate unlicensed marijuana uses. 12. Unlike recreational licensed marijuana production, processing, and retail sales under chapter 69.50 RCW, all other marijuana uses, including medical marijuana and businesses offering "private" marijuana consumption or "vaping," remain unlicensed marijuana uses that are largely unregulated and are not subject to review,licensing,or enforcement by the LCB or other State or local agency. 13. The Washington State Legislature is likely to propose and consider legislation on medical marijuana in its 2015 Legislative session,but the City cannot determine what that legislation may provide or when or if it will be passed. 14. The City of Spokane Valley Police informally documented 45 marijuana-related crimes between November 13,2013, and December 9,2014,with at least 30 of those involving persons under the age of 21. 15. As of October 28, 2014, the City had processed business registration endorsements for at least 18 medical-marijuana related businesses within the City, all of which provide marijuana outside of the licensing, regulation, and enforcement of the LCB, none of which are licensed marijuana producers, processors, or retail outlets under chapter 69.50 RCW, and none of which are subject to the City's regulations under SVMC 19.85 or SVMC 19.120.050. 16. Pursuant to Article 11, Section 11 of the Washington Constitution, the City of Spokane Valley is authorized to "make and enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws,"which includes the adoption of regulations governing land uses within the City; and 17. The lack of regulatory oversight at any level over unlicensed marijuana uses, such as medical marijuana collective gardens, designated providers, and "private" marijuana consumption businesses, (1) creates a market for marijuana that is inconsistent with the highly regulated market established by licensed producers, processors, and retail sales by the LCB; (2) allows potential for increased access to Ordinance 15-002 Page 3 of 5 DRAFT marijuana by minors; and (3) creates a risk to the public health, safety and welfare because of the lack of regulatory oversight and potential for abuse. 18. On November 4, 2014, the City Council adopted its 2015-2017 Legislative Agenda, which includes an item wherein the City Council stated it would "support the reconciliation of the recreational and medical marijuana statutes," "support development of one system that would regulate medical and recreational marijuana, (including the elimination of medical marijuana), in Washington State," and would "support State regulations which close gaps within current legislation: Vaping, edibles, oils, and `private' consumption/facilities; and under age possession and consumption." 19. Additional time is necessary to allow the City to conduct appropriate research to analyze the allowance, siting, and necessary land use regulations for unlicensed marijuana uses under existing state law, and to determine what, if any, regulations may be passed by the Washington State Legislature in the upcoming 2015 legislative session regarding unlicensed marijuana uses and the impact of such laws on unlicensed marijuana uses within the City. 20. A moratorium provides the City with additional time to review and amend its public health, safety, and welfare requirements and zoning and land use regulations related to the establishment and operation of unlicensed marijuana uses. 21. RCW 36.70A.390 provides that"A county or city governing body that adopts a moratorium, interim zoning map,interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control without holding a public hearing on the proposed moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control, shall hold a public hearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, whether or not the governing body received a recommendation on the matter from the planning commission or department. If the governing body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the governing body shall do so immediately after this public hearing. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control adopted under this section may be effective for not longer than six months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related studies providing such a longer period. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance or interim official control may be renewed for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal." 22. A moratorium enacted under RCW 35A.63.220 and/or RCW 36.70A.390 is a method by which local governments may preserve the status quo so that new plans and regulations will not be rendered moot by intervening development. 23. RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 both authorize the enactment of a moratorium, interim zoning map,interim zoning ordinance,or interim official control prior to holding a public hearing, provided a public hearing is held within 60 days of the adoption of the moratorium. 24. The City has authority to establish a moratorium concerning the establishment and operation of unlicensed marijuana uses as a necessary stop-gap measure: (1)to provide the City with an opportunity to study the issues associated with allowing, siting, and regulating unlicensed marijuana uses, including determining what, if any, regulations are passed by the Washington State Legislature in the upcoming 2015 legislative session and the impacts of those laws upon unlicensed marijuana uses; (2) to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley by avoiding and ameliorating negative impacts and unintended consequences of additional unlicensed marijuana; and (3) to avoid applicants possibly establishing vested rights contrary to and inconsistent with any revisions the City may make for its rules and regulations as a result of the City's study of this matter. Ordinance 15-002 Page 4 of 5 DRAFT 25. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 14-021, City Council adopted a work plan to address the issues involving the City's regulation and establishment of unlicensed marijuana uses. 26. Staff has completed SEPA review of the moratorium and a Determination of Non- Significance ("DNS")was issued on December 19,2014. No comments were received on the DNS. 27. On January 27, 2015, City Council conducted a public hearing on the adoption of Ordinance 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses. 28. The City Council received written testimony from three interested parties and 18 interested parties spoke at the public hearing. The City Council has given due consideration to all public testimony received. 29. The adoption of Ordinance No. 14-021 and the establishment of a moratorium on unlicensed marijuana uses is consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 30. The City Council finds that the moratorium imposed and established by Ordinance No. 14- 021 is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, public safety, public property and public peace. Section 2. Duration. The moratorium set forth in Ordinance shall be and remain in effect for a period of 365 days from the date of Ordinance No. 14-021, unless repealed, extended, or modified by the City Council after subsequent public hearing(s) and entry of appropriate findings of fact,pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390. Section 3. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority set forth herein and prior to the effective date of this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 4. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this day of February,2015. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 15-002 Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO, 14-021 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,ADOPTING A MORATORIUM ON TilE ESTABLISHMENT OF ALL MARIJUANA USES OTHER THAN MARIJUANA PRODUCERS, MARIJUANA PROCESSORS, AND MARIJUANA RETAIL SALES AS LICENSED BY THE WASHINGTON STATE LIQUOR CONTROL BOARD PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 693(1 RCW AND REGULATF.I.) BY CHAPTER 19.85 SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE AND SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.120.050,AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, since 1970, federal law has prohibited the manufacture and possession of marijuana as a Schedule I drug, based on the federal government's categorization of marijuana as having a "high potential for abuse, lack of any accepted medical usc, and absence of any accepted safety for use in medically supervised treatment." Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 14 (2005), Controlled Substance Act, 84 Stat_ 1242,21 U.S.C. 801 e1 seq; and WHEREAS, Initiative Measure No. 692, approved by the voters of Washington State on November 3, 1998, and now codified as chapter 69.51A RCW, created an affirmative defense for "qualifying patients"to the charge of possession of marijuana; and WHEREAS, in 2011, the Washington State Legislature considered and passed ESSSB 5073 that, among other things, (1) authorized the licensing of medical cannabis dispensaries, production facilities, and processing facilities, (2) permitted qualifying patients to receive certain amounts of marijuana for medicinal purposes from designated providers, (3) permitted collective gardens by qualifying patients whereby they may, consistent with state law, collectively grow marijuana for their own use, (4) and clarified that cities were authorized to continue to use their zoning authority to regulate the production, processing, or dispensing of marijuana under ESSSB 5073 and chapter 69.51A RCW within their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, on April 29, 2011, former governor Christine Gregoire vetoed the portions of ESSSB 5073 that would have provided the legal basis for legalizing and licensing medical cannabis dispensaries, processing facilities, and production facilities,thereby making these activities illegal; and WHEREAS, on November 6, 2012, voters of the State of Washington approved Initiative Measure No. 502 ("1-502"), now codified in chapters 69.50, 46.04, 46.20, 46.21,and 46.61 Revised Code of Washington ("RCW"), which provisions, (1) decriminalized possession and use of certain amounts of marijuana and marijuana paraphernalia; (2) amended state laws pertaining to driving under the influence of intoxicants to include driving under the influence of marijuana; and (3) established a regulatory system licensing producers, processors, and retailers of recreational marijuana for adults 21 years of age and older, and required the Washington State Liquor Control Board (the "LCB") to adopt procedures and criteria by December 1, 2013 for issuing licenses to produce, process, and sell marijuana; and WHEREAS, on August 29, 2013, the United States Department of Justice issued a memo providing updated guidance on marijuana enforcement in response to the adoption of 1-502. Several ongoing federal enforcement priorities were outlined, including prevention of crime and preventing distribution of marijuana to minors. Further, the memo provided that the Department would not seek ongoing prosecution of marijuana providers, users, and local officials in states that authorized marijuana, provided that those state and local governments "implement strong and effective regulatory and enforcement systems that will address the threat those state laws could pose to public safety, public Ordinance 14-021 Page 1 o15 health, and other law enforcement interests. A system adequate to that task must not only contain robust controls and procedures on paper; it must also be effective in practice;" and WIIEREAS, the LCIS has established a comprehensive regulatory scheme for the licensing, operation, and enforcement of recreational marijuana production, processing, and retail sales shops under chapter 314-55 WAC; and WHEREAS, in 2014, the Washington State Legislature considered, but did not adopt E3SSB 5887 that would have reconciled the comprehensive state regulatory scheme for recreational marijuana under 1-502 and the lack of regulatory oversight and controls over medical marijuana under chapter 69.5IA RCW; and WHEREAS, the possession of medical marijuana, operation of collective gardens, and services provided by designated providers remain illegal under chapter 69.51A RCW and Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent, 180 Wn. App. 455 (2014), cert. granted, with such activities only entitled to an affirmative defense;and WHEREAS, RCW 69.50.445 prohibits the opening of a package containing marijuana, useable marijuana, or a marijuana-infused product, or consumption of marijuana, useable marijuana, or a marijuana-infused product "within view of the general public," but does not otherwise regulate operation of any "private" marijuana consumption facility, "vaping" of marijuana extracts or oils, or other unlicensed marijuana operations; and WHEREAS, unlike recreational licensed marijuana production, processing, and retail sales under chapter 69.50 RCW, all other marijuana uses, including medical marijuana and husincsscs offering "private"consumption or"vaping," remain unlicensed marijuana uses that are largely unregulated and are not subject to review, licensing, or enforcement by the LCB; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature is likely to propose and consider legislation on medical marijuana in the upcoming 2015 Legislative session, but the City cannot determine what that legislation may provide or when or if it will be passed; and WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley Police have informally documented 45 marijuana-related crimes since November 13,2013, with at least 30 of those involving persons under the age of 21;and WHEREAS on July 22, 2014, the City adopted Ordinance No. 14-008, which established in chapter 19.85 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code ("SVMC") and SVMC 19.120.050 regulations, zoning, buffers, and other limitations on marijuana producers, processors, and retail sellers licensed under chapter 69.50 RCW, but which did not regulate unlicensed marijuana uses; and WHEREAS, as of October 28, the City had at least 18 medical-marijuana related businesses registered within the City, all of which provide marijuana outside of the licensing, regulation, enforcement of the LCB, none of which are licensed marijuana producers, processors, or retail outlets under chapter 69.50 RCW, and none of which arc subject to the City's regulations under SVMC 19.85 or SVMC 19.120.050;and WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 11, Section 11 of the Washington Constitution, the City of Spokane Valley is authorized to "makc and enforce within its limits all such local police, sanitary and other regulations as are not in conflict with general laws," which includes the adoption of regulations governing land uses within the City; and WHEREAS, RCW 36.70A.390 provides that "A county or city governing body that adopts a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control without holding a Ordinance 14-021 Page 2 of 5 public hearing on the proposed moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control, shall hold a public hearing on the adopted moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control within at least sixty days of its adoption, whether or not the governing body received a recommendation on the matter from the planning commission or department. If the governing body does not adopt findings of fact justifying its action before this hearing, then the governing body shall do so immediately after this public hearing. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control adopted under this section may be effective for not longer than six months, but may be effective for up to one year if a work plan is developed for related studies providing such a longer period. A moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance or interim official control may be renewed for one or more six-month periods if a subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal;"and WHEREAS, a moratorium enacted under RCW 35A.63.220 and/or RCW 36.70A.390 is a method by which local governments may preserve the status quo so that new plans and regulations will not be rendered moot by intervening development; and WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390 both authorize the enactment of a moratorium, interim zoning map, interim zoning ordinance, or interim official control prior to holding a public hearing; and WHEREAS, pursuant to WAC 197-11-880, the adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from the requirements of a threshold determination under the State Environmental Policy Act; and WHEREAS, the lack of regulatory oversight at auy level over unlicensed marijuana uses, such as medical marijuana collective gardens, designated providers, and "private" marijuana consumption businesses, (I) creates a market for marijuana that is inconsistent with the highly regulated market established by licensed producers, processors, and retail sales by the LCD, (2) allows increased access to marijuana by minors, and (3) creates a risk to the public health, safety and welfare because of the lack of regulatory oversight and potential for abuse; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2014, the City Council adopted its 2015-2017 Legislative Agenda, which included an item wherein the City Council stated it would "support the reconciliation of the recreational and medical marijuana statutes," "support development of one system that would regulate medical and recreational marijuana, (including the elimination of medical marijuana), in Washington State," and would "support State regulations which close gaps within current legislation: Vaping, edibles, oils, and `private' consumption/facilities; and under age possession and consumption;"and WHEREAS, additional time is necessary to allow the City to conduct appropriate research to analyze the allowance, siting, and necessary land-use regulations for unlicensed marijuana uses under existing state law, and to determine what, if any, regulations may be passed by the Washington State Legislature in the upcoming 2015 legislative session regarding unlicensed marijuana uses and the impact of such laws on unlicensed marijuana uses within the City; and WHEREAS, a moratorium will provide the City with additional time to review and amend its public health, safety, and welfare requirements and zoning and land use regulations related to the establishment and operation of unlicensed marijuana uses;and WHEREAS, Washington State law, including RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390, authorizes the City to adopt a moratorium, provided the City conducts a public hearing on the moratorium within 60 days of the date of adoption of the moratorium; and WHEREAS, the City has authority to establish a moratorium concerning the establishment and operation of unlicensed marijuana uses as a necessary stop-gap measure: (I) to provide the City with an Ordinance 14-021 Page 3 of 5 opportunity to study the issues associated with allowing, siting, and regulating unlicensed marijuana uses, including determining what, if any, regulations are passed by the Washington State Legislature in the upcoming 2015 legislative session and the impacts of those laws upon unlicensed marijuana uses; (2) to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the City of Spokane Valley by avoiding and ameliorating negative impacts and unintended consequences of additional unlicensed marijuana; and (3) to avoid applicants possibly establishing vested rights contrary to and inconsistent with any revisions the City may make for its rules and regulations as a result of the City's study of this matter;and WIIEREAS, the City Council finds that the moratorium imposed and established by this Ordinance is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health, public safety, public property and public peace. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Section 1. Preliminary Findings. The City Council hereby adopts the above recitals as findings of fact in support of this Ordinance. Section 2. Moratorium Established, A. The City Council hereby declares and imposes a moratorium upon the submission, acceptance, processing, modification or approval of any permit applications or licenses by or for unlicensed marijuana use. B. For purposes of this moratorium, "unlicensed marijuana use" means the production, growing, processing, manufacturing, extraction, infusion into edible solids, liquids or gummies, allowing consumption on the premises of, sale, distribution, or delivery of marijuana, marijuana-infused products, extracts, concentrates, oils, or any other form of product containing or derived from marijuana and intended for human use by any business, association or other for-profit or not-for-profit establishment, including but not limited to collective gardens, designated providers, medical marijuana dispensaries, or private marijuana "vaping," smoking, or consumption clubs; provided, however, "unlicensed marijuana use" shall not include any marijuana producer, marijuana processor, or marijuana retailer that has received and holds a valid marijuana producer, marijuana processor,or marijuana retailer license from the Washington Liquor Control Board pursuant to chapter 69.50 RCW and chapter 314-55 WAC;provided, further, if a building permit for work within a business is necessary in order for a business to obtain a valid marijuana license from the Washington Liquor Control Board under chapter 69.50 RCW, the City may accept and process such permit prior to the applicant receiving its license from the Washington Liquor Control Board, C. "Unlicensed marijuana use"does not and shall not include any personal possession or use of marijuana, marijuana-infused products, marijuana extracts, marijuana concentrates, marijuana oils, or other form of product containing or derived from marijuana and intended for human use by any person pursuant to chapter 69.50 RCW or by any qualifying patient pursuant to RCW 69.5I A.040. D. Nothing herein shall affect the processing or consideration of any existing and already- submitted complete land-use or building permit applications that may be subject to vested rights as provided under Washington law. Section 3. Work Plan. The following work plan is adopted to address the issues involving the City's regulation of; and the establishment of unlicensed marijuana uses: A. The City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission is hereby authorized and directed to hold public hearings and public meetings to fully receive and consider statements, testimony, positions, Ordinance 14-021 Page 4 of 5 and other documentation or evidence related to the public health, safety, and welfare aspects of unlicensed marijuana uses. B. The City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission is hereby authorized and directed to work with City staff and the citizens of the City, as well as all public input received, to develop proposals for regulations pertaining to the establishment of unlicensed marijuana uses, which regulations may provide provisions restricting or limiting unlicensed marijuana use up to and including bans, to be forwarded and recommended to the City Council for its consideration. Section 4. Public Hearing. Pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and 36.70A.390, the City Council shall conduct a public hearing on January 27, 2015 at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, at the City of Spokane Valley City Hall, 11707 East Sprague, Spokane Valley, 99206, City Council Chambers, to hear and consider the comments and testimony of those wishing to speak at such public hearing regarding the moratorium set forth in this Ordinance. Section 5. Duration. The moratorium set forth in this Ordinance shall be in effect as of the date of this Ordinance and shall continue in effect for a period of 365 days from the date of this Ordinance, unless repealed, extended, or modified by the City Council after subsequent public hearing(s) and entry of appropriate findings of fact, pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 and RCW 36.70A.390. Section 6. Ratification. Any act consistent with the authority set forth herein and prior to the effective date of this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Declaration of Emergency; Effective Date. This Ordinance is designated as a public emergency necessary for the protection of public health, safety, and welfare and therefore shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the City Council. Passed by the City Council this 9th day of December, 2014. ATTyS2 Dean Grafos„,114ayor rty Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as. - "orm: ' .ik - tA-va3) .I Office 1-to Cit ttorney Date of Publication: December 12, 2014 Effective Date: December 9, 2014 Ordinance 14-02 I Page 5 of 5 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24,2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ®new business ❑public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-003,Amending SVMC 20.30.060 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On January 20, 2015 an administrative report was provided, and on February 10,2015,the ordinance first reading was advanced. BACKGROUND: This amendment provides more flexibility for the Community Development Department to consider plat time extension requests. The text amendment allows for an initial three-year extension with additional one-year extensions possible. On January 8,2015,the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the amendment. On February 10,2015,Council considered the First Ordinance Reading and advanced the Ordinance to a second reading.No changes have occurred. OPTIONS: Move to approve the ordinance,with or without further modifications.. RECOMMENDED ACTION: I move to approve Ordinance 15-003, amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code 20.30.060 concerning plat time extension requests. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:None STAFF CONTACT: Micki Harnois,Planner ATTACHMENTS: Draft Ordinance 15-003 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 15-003 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE (SVMC) 20.30.060, TIME EXTENSIONS RELATING TO LENGTH OF TIME AND FREQUENCY OF EXTENSIONS, ELIMINATING 20.30.060(A-C); AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on September 25, 2007, the City of Spokane Valley (City) adopted Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)Title 19,pursuant to Ordinance 07-015; and WHEREAS,on October 28,2007, SVMC Title 19 became effective; and WHEREAS, such regulations are authorized by RCW 36.70A; and WHEREAS,on November 13,2014,the Planning Commission held a study session; and WHEREAS,on December 12 and December 19,2014,notice of the Planning Commission public hearing was published in the Valley News Herald; and WHEREAS, on January 8, 2015, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, received evidence, information, public testimony, and a staff report with a recommendation followed by deliberations and provided a recommendation; and WHEREAS, on January 8, 2015, the Planning Commission approved the findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS,on January 20,2015,City Council reviewed the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, on January 26, 2015, the Washington State Department of Commerce was notified pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106, providing a 60-day notice of intent to adopt amendments to Spokane Valley development regulations; and WHEREAS, on February 2, 2015, a Request for Expedited Review was sent to the Washington State Department of Commence pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106(3)(b) and WAC 365-196-630(6). The expedited review period is 14 calendar days; and WHEREAS,on February 10,2015, City Council considered a first ordinance reading to adopt the proposed amendment; and WHEREAS, the amendments set forth below are consistent with the goals and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, SVMC 20.30.060, as amended, bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety and welfare, and protection of the environment. NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Ordinance 15-003 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to amend SVMC 20.30.060 to change the granting of a single, one-year time extension to a three-year time extension with the Community and Economic Development Department having the discretion of granting additional one-year extensions beyond the initial three-year extension. The text amendment includes the elimination of 20.30.060(A) through(C). Section 2. Findings and Conclusions. The City Council acknowledges that the Planning Commission conducted appropriate investigation and study,held a public hearing on the amendments and recommends approval of the amendments. The City Council has read and considered the Planning Commission's findings. The City Council hereby makes the following findings: A. Growth Management Act Policies - Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) provides that each city shall adopt a comprehensive land use plan and development regulations that are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan. B. City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies - The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted County-Wide Planning Policies, set forth below. 1. Land Use Policy-13.1: Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. 2. Economic Goal EDG-7: Maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility,consistency,predictability and clear direction. 3. Economic Policy EDP-7.1: Evaluate, monitor and improve development standards to promote compatibility between adjacent land uses; and update permitting processes to ensure that they are equitable, cost-effective, and expeditious. 4. Economic Policy EDP-7.2: Review development regulations periodically to ensure clarity,consistency and predictability. C. Conclusions 1. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the environment. 2. The proposed City-initiated Code text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan and the approval criteria contained in SVMC 17.80.150(F). 3. The GMA requires that the City's Comprehensive Plan and development regulations shall be subject to continuing review and evaluation by the City. Section 3. Amendment. Spokane Valley Municipal Code section 20.30.060 is hereby amended as follows: 20.30.060 Time extensions. I An application form and supporting data for time extension requests shallmust be submitted to the department at least 30 days prior to the expiration of the preliminary short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan. Time extension requests shall be processed as a Type I application pursuant to Chapter 17.80 SVMC. Ordinance 15-003 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT The directordepartment-may approve an extension provided there are no significant changed conditions or changed development regulations which would render recording of the short subdivision, subdivision or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare,; and provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply: A. That some portion of the existing preliminary short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan has been finalized since the project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the original approval; B. That the preliminary short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally consistent toward finalizing the plat or binding site plan,which shall include at least one of the following: 1. Surveying the lots within the development; 2. Arranging for public services to the site; .. • binding site plan; and/or '1. Completing studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary short subdivision, subdivision, or binding site plan approval; C. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extensions which the project sponsor would normally fund. If the conditions set forth in subsections A, B or C of this section are met, tThe department may grant an initial single, threeee-year time extension. Additional one year extensions may be granted by the department beyond the initial three-year extension. Prior to granting time extensions, the departmentdirector shall circulate the time extension request to affected agencies for comments. Additional or altered conditions recommended by the department or affected agencies may be required as a condition of this extension. This may include new or updated City regulations deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety,or general welfare. City departments may also recommend additional or altered conditions. The department shall issue a written decision approving or denying the time extension request and provide copies to affected agencies, the applicant, and those parties requesting a copy of such decision. Appeals of a time extension shall be filed in a manner consistent with the provisions of Chapter 17.90 SVMC. Section 4. Other sections unchanged. All other provisions of Chapters 20.30 not specifically referenced hereto shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance. Ordinance 15-003 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley as provided by law. Passed by the City Council this 24th day of February,2015. Dean Grafos,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 15-003 Page 4 of 4 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24,2015 Department Director: El Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ®new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: First Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-004, Street Vacation (STV-2014- 0001) —Vacation of unimproved, triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue, 3,688 square feet in size. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 22.140; RCW 35A.47.020 and RCW 35.79 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: On December 9,2014,the City Council scheduled a public hearing for the Planning Commission for January 8, 2015. On February 10, 2015, City Council agreed to move this forward to an ordinance first reading. BACKGROUND: The City received an application on November 12, 2014 from J.R. Bonnett Engineers, on behalf of the owner River Sequel, LLC (Fritz Wolff), requesting the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue, 3,688 square feet in size. The portion of right-of-way proposed to be vacated is located at the intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway adjacent to Assessor's tax parcel number 45124.0138. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on January 8, 2015 and voted unanimously to recommend approval of the proposed street vacation. On February 10, 2015 Council agreed to move this forward to an ordinance first reading. As noted in the Ordinance (Section 1, #6b) staff recommends not charging for the street vacation. OPTIONS: Move to advance to a second reading with or without further amendments. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Move to advance Ordinance 15-004 to a second reading at the March 10, 2015 Council meeting. STAFF CONTACT: Karen Kendall, Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Draft Ordinance 15-004 B. Signed Planning Commission Findings and Recommendation C. Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission D. PC Meeting Minutes December 11,2014 E. PC Meeting Minutes January 8,2015 F. PC Meeting Minutes January 22,2015 G. Resolution 07-009 Adopting Policies for Imposing Vacation Charges H. Aerial Photo Page 1 of 1 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 15-004 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON, PROVIDING FOR A RIGHT-OF-WAY VACATION OF 3,688 SQUARE FEET OF OLD MISSION AVENUE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE SOUTHERN BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 45124.0138, AND PROVIDING FOR OTHER MATTERS PROPERLY RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, on November 8, 2014, an application for vacation was filed, and was determined complete on December 1,2014; and WHEREAS, on December 9, 2014, the City Council by Resolution 14-013 set a public hearing date for January 8,2015,with the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS,on January 8,2015,the Planning Commission held a public hearing; and WHEREAS, following the hearing, the Planning Commission found that the notice and hearing requirements of the applicable Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) section 22.140.020 had been met; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission findings and recommendation have been filed with the City Clerk as part of the public record supporting the vacation; and WHEREAS, none of the property owners abutting the property to be vacated filed a written objection to the proposed vacation with the City Clerk;and WHEREAS, Chapter 22.140 SVMC requires that City Council shall specify that the vacated portion of the right-of-way shall belong to the abutting property owners; and WHEREAS,Avista will require a continued easement; and WHEREAS,the City Council desires to vacate the above right of way pursuant to Chapter 22.140 SVMC. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington,do ordain as follows: Section 1. Findings of Fact. The City Council makes the following findings of fact: 1. The right-of-way was never improved with pavement, curb or gutter and remains vacant property. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public and does not impede access or circulation. 2. The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public use or access and is not required for current or future public use or access. 3. There is no need for a new and different public right-of-way. 4. It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of the subject right-of-way for public access. 5. One public comment was submitted in support of the proposed vacation. No other public comments have been received regarding the proposed vacation. Ordinance 15-004-Street Vacation STV-2014-0001 Page 1 of 4 DRAFT 6. Pursuant to Resolution 07-009, Policy for Imposing Vacation Charges and RCW 35.79.030: a. The City of Spokane Valley has the authority to charge for vacations in an amount equal to 50% of the full appraised value; or for the full amount of the area vacated where the street has been part of a dedicated right-of-way for over twenty five years or if the property was acquired at public expense. b. Alternatively,the Council shall reserve the right to deviate from this policy upon the adoption of written findings of fact that demonstrate the public interest shall be best served by an alternative approach. The following facts are relevant to the Council's determination of an alternative approach: i. The right-of-way was dedicated in 1935 through a plat. ii. The right-of-way was not obtained at public expense. iii. The public interest has been served by recent site improvements and dedications by the adjoining property owner along Old Mission Avenue, approximately 5,600 square feet in area. Based on above findings the City does not seek payment for the vacated right-of-way. Section 2. Property to be Vacated. Based upon the above findings and in accordance with this Ordinance, the City Council does hereby vacate the street which is incorporated herein by reference, and legally described as follows: A parcel of land situated in the Southeast quarter of Section 12 and the Northeast quarter of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian in the City of Spokane Valley, County of Spokane, State of Washington, described as follows: COMMENCING at the Southeast corner of said Section 12; thence North 89°57'44" West 759.39 feet along the south line of said Section 12; thence North 0°02'16"East 31.83 feet to a point on the northerly right-of-way line of Mission Avenue and the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 89°4927" West 271.52 feet along the said northerly right-of-way line of Mission Avenue; thence, leaving said northerly right-of-way line, South 00°00'00" West 5.50 feet; thence South 89°4927"East 3.47 feet to the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 52.00 feet; thence southeasterly 37.59 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 41°24'48" to a point of reverse curve having a radius of 38.00 feet; thence southeasterly 27.47 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 41°24'48"; thence South 89°49'27" East 40.66 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve to the right having a radius of 550.43 feet, the radius point of which bears South 18°32'15"East; thence northeasterly 49.98 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 5°12'07" to a point of compound curve having a radius of 481.28 feet; thence northeasterly 63.70 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 7°35'02" to a point of compound curve having a radius of 617.11 feet; thence northeasterly 57.21 feet along the arc of said curve through a central angle of 5°18'43"; thence North 01°10'33"East 0.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel encompasses 3,688 square feet, more or less. Section 3. Division of Property to be Vacated. Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040 and SVMC 22.140.040(C),the vacated portion of the street or alley shall belong to the abutting property owners,one- half to each, unless factual circumstances otherwise dictate a different division and distribution of the street or alley to be vacated. The vacated right-of-way is a portion of the north one-half of Old Mission Ordinance 15-004-Street Vacation STV-2014-0001 Page 2 of 4 DRAFT Avenue and shall belong to the lot abutting to the north,as recorded in the record of survey which shall be created and recorded with the County as required under SVMC 22.140.090. Section 4. Zoning. The zoning designation for the vacated property shall be the designation attached to the adjoining properties as set forth within the respective property or lot lines. The Community and Economic Development Director is authorized to make this notation on the official Zoning Map of the City. Section 5. Conditions of Vacation. The following conditions shall be fully satisfied prior to the transfer of title by the City. 1. The completion of the street vacation (File No. STV-2014-0001) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within 90 days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into abutting parcel number 45124.0138. 3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be prepared and recorded with coordination between the property owner and utility purveyor. The easement with recording number shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation of easement submitted to City for verification. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the Ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Community and Economic Development Director or designee for review. 5. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees shall be paid by the proponent. The City does not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 6. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting Ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 7. The record of survey and certified copy of the Ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 8. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Section 6. Closing. Following satisfaction of the above conditions, the City Clerk shall record a certified copy of this Ordinance in the office of the County Auditor, and the City Manager is authorized to execute and finalize all necessary documents in order to complete the transfer of the property identified herein. Ordinance 15-004-Street Vacation STV-2014-0001 Page 3 of 4 DRAFT Section 7. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City of Spokane Valley, as provided by law. PASSED by the City Council this day of March,2015. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 15-004-Street Vacation STV-2014-0001 Page 4 of 4 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION January 22,2015 The following findings are consistent with the Planning Commission's decision to recommend approval of File No. STV-2014-0001,vacating a portion of Old Mission Avenue. A. Background: 1. Chapter 22.140 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC), governing street vacations, was adopted in September 2007 and became effective on October 28, 2007. 2. The privately-initiated street vacation, STV-2014-0001, proposes to vacate an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue 3,688 square feet in size. 3. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 8, 2015 and voted 7-0 to recommend a conditional approval of the street vacation (STV-2014-0001) to City Council. B. Planning Commission Findings: Compliance with SVMC 22.140.030 Planning Commission review and recommendation Finding(s): 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is raw land without pavement,curb or gutter. Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owner developing a multi-family development to the north a landscaped area for enhanced aesthetics at the entry to the Centennial Trailhead and apartment entrance. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public and does not impede access or circulation. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public use or access and is not required for current or future public use or access. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? There is no need for a new and different public way. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of the subject right-of-way for public access. Staff received comments from Spokane Transit Authority (STA) stating there is no current service to the area. Further conversation with STA indicated that future development will likely warrant an STA bus route. At that time they will have the flexibility to work with Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 1 of 3 the City and/or property owner to assess the best location for a bus stop along Mission and Indiana Parkway. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? Staff received 1 public comment in support of the proposed vacation from a neighboring property owner. Avista Utilities confirmed they have gas and electric utilities in the right-of-way and request preservation of utilities. Spokane County Utilities and Consolidated Irrigation District provided no objection as they have no facilities within the area proposed to be vacated. C. Conclusions: The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. D. Recommendation: Planning Commission recommends City Council approve the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue 3,688 square feet in size subject to the following: 1. The completion of the street vacation(File No. STV-2014-0001)including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety(90)days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel 45124.0138. 3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be prepared and recorded with coordination between the property owner and utility purveyor. The easement with recording number shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation of easement submitted to City for verification. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation,a record of survey of the area to be vacated,prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington including an exact metes and bounds legal description,and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction,repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services,shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community and Economic Development,or designee for review. 5. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of- way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards. 6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges,copying fees, Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 2 of 3 and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation,and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Approved this 22nd day of January,2015 Joe Stoy,Chairman A EST / r j7 71 ,r,/16i,6)b Dean`n►a Horton,Administrative Assistant Findings and Recommendations of the Spokane Valley Planning Commission Page 3 of 3 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION Spokane STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ..Valley FILE No: STV-2014-0001 STAFF REPORT DATE: December 31,2014 FILE NO: STV-2014-0001 PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request to vacate an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue approximately 3,688 square feet in size. STAFF PLANNER: Karen Kendall, Planner, Community Development Department PROPOSAL LOCATION: The area is located south of parcel 45124.0138, addressed as 16801 East Mission Parkway, intersection of Old Mission Avenue and Mission Parkway, further located in the SE quarter of Section 12, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane Valley, Washington PROPERTY OWNER: Fritz Wolff, River Sequel, LLC;220 West Main; Spokane, WA 99201 APPLICANT: Mark Grandwolh,J.R.Bonnett Engineers; 803 E 3`d Avenue; Spokane, WA 99202 APPROVAL CRITERIA: 1. SVMC-Title 22 (Street Vacations) 2. SVMC - Title 21 (Environmental Controls) 3. City of Spokane Valley Street Standards ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Vicinity Map Exhibit 2: Aerial Map Exhibit 3: Application Material Exhibit 4: Notice of Public Hearing Exhibit 5: Agency Comments Exhibit 6: Public Comment I. PROPERTY INFORMATION Size and Characteristics: The area is 3,688 square feet located behind a newly constructed sidewalk connecting Mission Parkway with Centennial Trailhead. It is flat and consists of native plants and weeds until such time the weather permits for planting of grass. Comprehensive Plan Mixed Use Center(MUC) Designation: _ Zoning of Property: Mixed Use Center(MUC) Existing Land Use: Vacant. Multifamily development located northwest of the right- of-way is currently under construction. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 1 of 4 December 31,2014 II. STAFF ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL A. COMPLIANCE WITH SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE(SVMC)TITLE 22.140.030— STREET VACATIONS Findings: 1. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public? The area proposed to be vacated is raw land without pavement, curb or gutter. Vacating the right-of-way will allow the property owner developing a multi-family development to the north a landscaped area for enhanced aesthetics at the entry to the Centennial Trailhead and apartment entrance. The vacation is expected to have no impact on the general public and does not impede access or circulation.. 2. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access? The right-of-way being vacated is currently vacant land not being utilized for public use or access and is not required for current or future public use or access. Should future development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. 3. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public? No. There is no need for a new and different public way. 4. Whether conditions may so change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists? It is not anticipated that changes would occur in the future which would require use of the subject right-of-way for public access. Should future development realign Mission and Indiana Parkway, intersection improvements at Mission Avenue will be reviewed and right-of-way needs assessed through agreement with the future development. Staff received comments from Spokane Transit Authority (STA) stating there is no current service to the area. Further conversation with STA indicated that future development will likely warrant an STA bus route. At that time they will have the flexibility to work with the City and/or property owner to assess the best location for a bus stop along Mission and Indiana Parkway. 5. Whether objections to the proposed vacation are made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public? Staff received 1 public comment for the proposed vacation from a neighboring property owner. Avista Utilities confirmed they have gas and electric utilities in the right-of- way and request preservation of utilities. Spokane County Utilities and Consolidated Irrigation District provided no objection as they have no facilities within the area proposed to be vacated. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 2 of 4 December 31,2014 Conclusions: The findings confirm criteria set forth in SVMC 22.140.030 have been met. B. COMPLIANCE WITH SVMC TITLE 21—ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLS The Planning Division has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to WAC 197-11-800 and SVMC 21.20.040 from environmental review under the provisions of the State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA). III. PUBLIC COMMENTS Findings: Staff received 1 public comment from Bob Boyle of Hanson Industries on December 30, 2014 in favor of the proposed street vacation. Conclusion(s): A Notice of Public Hearing sign was posted on the property December 19, 2014 and notices were posted in the Spokane Valley Public Library, City of Spokane Valley permit center and main reception area the same day. Public hearing notices were mailed to a 400' radius of the site on December 18, 2014 and notice was published in the Spokane Valley Herald on December 19, 2014 and December 26, 2014. Staff concludes that adequate public noticing was conducted for STV-2014-0001 in accordance with adopted public noticing procedures. IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Comments were received from the following agencies and are attached as exhibits to this staff report: 1. City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department (Traffic Engineer) 2. Spokane Transit Authority 3. Avista Utilities 4. Spokane County Utilities 5. Consolidated Irrigation District V. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS AND FINDINGS Staff concludes that STV-2014-0001 as proposed is generally consistent, or will be made consistent,through the recommended conditions of approval based on the approval criteria stated herein. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the vacation of an unimproved triangle shaped area along Old Mission Avenue approximately 3,688 square feet in size subject to the following: 1. The completion of the street vacation (File No. STV-2014-0001) including all conditions below shall be submitted to the City for review within ninety(90) days following the effective date of approval by the City Council. 2. The vacated property shall be transferred into the abutting parcel 45124.0138. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 3 of 4 December 31,2014 3. All necessary easements required by Avista shall be prepared and recorded with coordination between the property owner and utility purveyor. The easement with recording number shall be shown on the record of survey and written documentation of easement submitted to City for verification. 4. Following the City Council's passage of the ordinance approving the street vacation, a record of survey of the area to be vacated, prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington including an exact metes and bounds legal description, and specifying any and all applicable easements for construction, repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services, shall be submitted by the proponent to the Director of Community Development, or designee for review. 5. The surveyor shall locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of- way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the City of Spokane Valley Street Standards. 6. All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. 7. The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining the street to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation, and all area included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. 8. The record of survey and certified copy of the ordinance shall be recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 9. All conditions of City Council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Staff Report and Recommendation STV-2014-0001 Page 4 of 4 December 31,2014 Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall, December 11,2014 Chair Stoy called the meeting to order at 6:04 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Ms.Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson John Hohman,Community Development Director Christina Carlsen Cary Driskell,City Attorney Robert McCaslin Karen Kendall,Planner Mike Phillips,Absent-Excused Steven Neill Joe Stoy Sam Wood Deanna Horton, Secretary Hearing no objection, the Chair excused Commissioner Phillips. Commissioner Carlsen moved to approve the December 11, 2014 agenda as presented. Commissioner Stoy noted the public hearing on CTA-2014-0006 regarding time extensions on a preliminary plats would be held at the January 8,2015 meeting. Motion passed with a six to zero vote. Commissioner Carlsen moved to approve the November 13, 2014 minutes as presented. The vote on the minutes was six to zero, the motion passed. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Wood reported he attended the Greater Spokane Valley Chamber meeting, commenting the Chamber had reported a new sports complex will be built in the city of Spokane and that development could be occurring around the Mirabeau Park area. Commissioner McCaslin reported he had spent time with the Central Valley Key Club who were working on blankets for the Under the Bridge project. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Community Development Director John Hohman informed the Commissioners the City Council had finished the local adoption process for the Shoreline Master Program which will now be sent to the Dept. of Ecology for the final step. Mr. Hohman also acknowledged and thanked departing Commissioners Neill, McCaslin and Carlsen for their service for their years of service. These Commissioners'terms are end Dec.31,2014. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Study Session — STV-2014-0001, vacation of a portion of Old Mission near Mission Parkway and the Old Mission Trailhead. Planner Karen Kendall explained the street vacation process,the application is received requesting to vacate a portion of right-of-way, the City Council sets the public hearing before the Planning Commission. The application is routed for comments to staff such as Public Works and engineering, and outside agencies. Staff prepares a recommendation taking into account connectivity, traffic volumes and future development. The Planning Commission holds the public hearing and makes a recommendation which is forwarded to the City Council. The City Council then makes the final decision regarding vacating the right-of-way. Ms.Kendall explained STV-2014-000l was a request to vacate approximately 3700 square feet of the intersection of Mission Parkway and Old Mission Avenue at the trailhead to for the Centennial Trail. The property would be absorbed by the property owner to the north and would be used to enhance the trailhead entrance. Director Hohman explained the cooperation and contributions the developer has 10-23-14 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 2 had with the City through this phase of the project and the previous phase and how he is improving the trailhead in this location. Commissioners had a few questions regarding the vacation, clarifying the City was not using it as right-of-way currently, that the property had not been appraised, how the developer would be using the property,the vacation is not a request to expand the development to the north. Having no further questions, Ms. Kendall confirmed the public hearing for this proposal is scheduled for January 8,2015. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Ms. Horton reminded the Commission elections for Chair and Vice Chair would be held at the next meeting and the rules on who could hold those positons were in the Planning Commission Rules of Procedure. Mr. Neill, Mr. McCaslin and Ms. Carlsen all said farewell and thank you for the time spent in their positions and for the experience gained as Commissioners. Deputy City Attorney Lamb thanked the departing Commissioners for their service and commented to the remaining Commissioners regarding the moratorium on medical marijuana businesses. Mr. Lamb mentioned how the review of any regulations would be coming to the Planning Commission consideration and the City is waiting to see how the State will regulate the medical side of the marijuana businesses. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business,the meeting was adjourned at 6:45 p.m. Joe Stoy,Chairperson Date signed kin) Deanna Horton,Secretary 10-23-14 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 2 Approved Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall, January 8,2015 Secretary of the Commission Deanna Horton called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Ms. Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson John Hohman,Community Development Director Heather Graham Cary Driskell,City Attorney Tim Kelley Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Mike Phillips Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Susan Scott Christina Janssen,Planner Joe Stoy Karen Kendall,Planner Sam Wood Martin Palaniuk,Planner Micki Harnois,Planner Deanna Horton,Secretary of the Commission Commissioner Stoy moved to approve the January 8, 2014 amended agenda as presented. Motion passed with a seven to zero vote. Commissioner Anderson moved to approve the December 11, 2014 minutes as presented. The vote on the minutes was seven to zero, the motion passed. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioners had no report. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Sr. Planner Lori Barlow welcomed the new Commissioners, and introduced the staff. Ms. Barlow stated the legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan would be an upcoming project for the Commission;staff had begun work to schedule Planning Short Course for end of February or early March. Deputy City Attorney Erik Lamb welcomed the Commission and shared that the legal staff would be bringing forward training for the Commission on the open public meetings act and public records. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Election of Officers: Ms. Horton conducted the election of officers. Ms. Horton asked for nominations for the office of chair. Mr. Anderson nominated Joe Stoy for Chair. Having no other nominations, Mr. Stoy was declared Chair for the year 2015. Ms. Horton asked for nominations for the office of Vice Chair. Commissioner Phillips nominated Kevin Anderson for the office of Vice Chair. There were no other nominations for Vice Chair and Mr. Anderson was declared the Vice Chair for the year 2015. Public Hearing—STV-2014-0001, vacation of a portion of Old Mission near Mission Parkway and the Old Mission Trailhead. Planner Karen Kendall explained STV-2014-0001 was a request to vacate approximately 3700 square feet of the intersection of Mission Parkway and Old Mission Avenue. The property would be absorbed by the property owner to the north and would be used to enhance the trailhead entrance. Commissioner Anderson asked if the road to the trailhead for the Centennial Trail was a public road. Ms. Kendell confirmed it was. Commissioner Wood asked if the vacation would impact any utility easements,none would be impacted. Commissioner Stoy opened the public hearing at 6:25 p.m. and took a vote to incorporate the staff report into the public hearing which was approved by a vote of seven to zero. Commissioner Wood 01-08-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 4 asked to clarify the developer had given up property for the development of the Centennial Trial trailhead at this location. Staff responded the developer had worked closely with staff to develop the area and had contributed to the development. Seeing no one who wished to testify,Chair Stoy closed the public hearing at 6:29 p. m. Commissioner Anderson moved to recommend approval to the City Council of STY-2014-0001. The vote on this motion was seven to zero, motion passes. Public Hearing—CTA-2014-0006,Subdivisions,Time Extensions Commissioner Stoy opened the public hearing at 6:32 p.m. Planner Micki Harnois gave a staff report regarding the change to chapter 20.30.060 regarding time extensions for final plat approvals. Currently the City's code provides for a one time,one year extension if a plat cannot be completed in the state allowed five year time period. Currently there is a situation where a developer cannot finish his plat because he is waiting for a map change from FEMA. Staff is proposing to clean up some language and to change the time to a request to an initial three year extension with one year extensions afterward. Ms.Harnois noted that with the extensions,the director could apply conditions to the project which would bring it into line with the current codes. Ms.Harnois noted she had contacted several jurisdictions. Other time lines ranged from one one-year extension with no other extensions allowed to an initial three year extension with one year extensions at one year at a time.Commissioner Wood asked if the City of Spokane allowed a one year extension and regardless of the situation,they did not allow another extension,which Ms.Harnois confirmed as correct. Commissioner Anderson asked if the City took any responsibility to notify the developer that the plat was getting close to expiring. Ms. Barlow stated as part of the staff report when preliminary approval is received they are notified of the specific date the plat expires. If a plat expires the developer can they reapply, but the process starts over. Commissioner Graham asked if staff was aware of how many plats have needed an extension. Ms. Harnois stated the case where the developer is waiting for a FEMA map change to finish his plat. She also asked if the extension is granted would the development fall under new code. The plat would be vested in the code at the time of approval however,the director could apply new conditions if it were warranted. Seeing no one who wished to testify,Chair Stoy closed the public hearing at 6:46 p.m. Commissioner Anderson moved to recommend approval to the City Council of CTA-2014-0006. Commissioner Phillips commented that he is very much in favor of the proposal, he has had times when he needed the extra time to finish a plat. He also stated that today most plats are fairly small, but it depends on the size of the preliminary plat how quickly they can be completed. Most developers are not willing to develop large subdivisions,so they do it in phases. This all takes time to get thru all the requirements. Commissioner Phillips stated that he is very much in favor of this and would like to see notices sent out when as things get close to expiring. Commissioner Stoy stated he agrees with the proposal and feels the ending dates get forgotten. He stated that maybe there could be a process to notify whoever is providing the developer and or the civil plans notification stating that there plat is about to expire and that they have 30 days. Mr. Lamb stated from a legal stand point these are the developer's plats and not the City's plats. It is the developer's responsibility to remember the dates. If the City created a system of providing notices, it could create a significant risk for the City and liability should one be missed. It is not something that he can recommend from a legal standpoint. The vote on this motion was seven to zero, motion passes. Ms. Barlow explained to the Planning Commission that they would be deviating from the normal process and they will be bringing back the findings CTA-2014-0006 to the Planning Commission that evening for approval. 01-08-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 4 Study Session: CPA-2015-0001, Comprehensive Plan Annual amendment, a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment located on Nora Ave.between Pines Rd and Mamer Rd. Ms. Barlow reviewed the Growth Management Act and Comprehensive Plan process before the Study Session began. Planner Christina Janssen began her study session regarding the first privately (citizen) initiated Comprehensive Plan(Comp Plan)amendment. CPA-2015-0001 is a request to change from Office to Community Commercial. The request is located on Nora Avenue between Pines Road and Mamer Road. It is three parcels with one single family residence. It is bordered on the east and west by Office,south by High Density Residential and north by Regional Commercial. The site has remained fairly vacant for some years and the owner believes the change will make the property more marketable. Commissioner Anderson stated he did not agree with the staff report's statement that conditions have changed beyond the property owners control because he looked and the property owner has not owned the property long enough to have the conditions change. He also stated he did not know if the property was still sitting vacant because of lack of marketing or failure of marketing. Ms. Janssen commented staff have received many calls on this area because of the high visibility of it however, the current zoning limits what people are able to do, which keeps people from looking at it harder. She stated she felt that in the legislative update of the Comp Plan the area would be reviewed for changes in general. Ms.Janssen continued to explain one of the approval criteria for the change is the property must be adjacent to the same or a higher classification than the request being made, which includes over a right-of-way (ROW). In this case the property is adjacent to Regional Commercial across a ROW. The right-of-way here is Interstate-90 (I-90). The Commissioners questioned the use of I-90 as a connecting ROW as an approval criterion. Ms. Janssen stated that between the property and the properties with the higher classification there was only ROW. Ms. Barlow also assisted in explaining how the ROW,and I-90, is used to reach the approval criteria. Commissioner Scott commented her concerns over the traffic. She said it is a 25 MPH road, with a right turn only at Pines,and a steep grade at Mamer.Rd. She said she was concerned about the truck traffic on the road. Ms. Janssen said she had spoken to the senior traffic engineer who said most likely at the time of a building permit, he would be requiring mitigation at the Pines Rd.and Mission Ave. intersection as well as the and Pines Rd. and Nora Ave. intersection because they are both performing below standard. Commissioners asked about spot zoning in the middle of an area, with no other similar zoning near it. Ms. Barlow stated she did not feel this was spot zoning, since the approval criteria was across ROW and there was nothing but ROW in front of the property, to a higher classification. She also expressed the area was one of concern for staff to review to a change in the upcoming legislative update to the Comp Plan. She said she would not guess a change to what but the office zone in the area was clearly not working for the properties there. Study Session: CPA-2015-0002, Comprehensive Plan Annual amendment, a privately initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment located at the intersection of Mission Ave.and Flora Rd. Planner Marty Palaniuk began his study session regarding the second privately (citizen) initiated Comprehensive Plan (Comp Plan) amendment. CPA-2015-0002 is a request to change from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Mixed Use Center (MUC). The request is located on the northwest corner of Mission Avenue and Flora Road. It is two parcels with a greenhouse located on it. It is bordered on the north and east by Low Density Residential and south and west by Mixed Use Center. The site is just east of the street vacation which the Commission just recommended for approval. It is located on two minor arterials. Commissioner Anderson asked if the parcels to the south were vacant. Mr. Palaniuk confirmed they were. Commissioner Anderson also asked how close the transit was,which is located at Mission and Barker, but a distance could not be provided. He did not feel this was"close"as was indicated in the 01-08-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 4 staff report. Ms. Barlow commented in the future, exact distances would be used. Commissioner Wood stated he could go either way on this,there seemed to be a natural boundary for the zoning at Flora•Rd. He also asked if the change would allow manufactured home parks. Mr. Palaniuk said it would not, Mr. Wood said he knew the property owner and knew they owned other manufactured home parks. Commissioner Graham said she runs in the area and there are no sidewalks in the area. Ms. Barlow commented any commercial development would be required to put in frontage improvements at the time of development, however single family development might trigger the same. Findings of Fact: CTA-2014-0006,Subdivisions,Time Extensions. Ms. Harnois handed out the Planning Commission findings of fact for review. She commented once the Findings are signed they will move on to City Council. Mr.Lamb explained the primary purpose of the findings is to layout the basis for determining the compliance with the City's code in providing the recommendation of approval of the code text amendment. There are two approval criteria for code text amendments,the first is that the amendment is consistent with applicable provisions of the Comp Plan and the second is that it bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment. As staff explained during the staff report in earlier in the evening, there are various goals and polices set out in the Comp Plan which apply to this specific amendment, and in these findings they have outlined the goals and polices which staff feel are applicable, which the Commission would ultimately approve. The second would be the general public health, safety, welfare, which is a vague term for a text amendment, which is at times difficult to determine. The vote on the findings is more on the basis for the recommendation,not the recommendation itself. Commissioner Anderson asked why the conclusions on the findings were not the same as the conclusions on the staff report. Mr. Lamb also pointed out to the Commission they are allowed to change the findings if they do not agree with them. Commissioner Anderson stated they were two different sentences. In the staff report it states the overall conclusion is consistent with the Comp Plan policies and goals and on the findings it states it is consistent with the City's adopted Comp Plan and the approval criteria. Mr. Lamb stated in the future that staff would work to make sure the staff report and findings reflected the same language however, this did say the same thing in a different way. Commissioner Phillips asked to verify that the language underline and strike through language would be attached to the findings as part of the record. Commissioner Anderson moved to recommend approval to the City Council the Findings of Fact for CTA-2014-0006 as presented The vote on this motion was seven to zero, motion passes. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Commissioner Anderson asked how the Commission would go about amending the public hearing script from the Planning Commission's Rules of Procedure. Mr. Lamb and Ms.Horton shared with the Commission in the Rules of Procedure allow for updates in the odd numbered years,and staff would assist in reviewing the script. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business,the meeting was adjourned at 8:19 p.m. Joe Stoy,Chairperson Date signed IFA Deanna Horton,Secretary 01-08-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of APPROVED Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall, January 22,2015 Chairman Stoy called the meeting to order at 6:02 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Ms.Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson Lori Barlow,Senior Planner Heather Graham Cary Driskell,City Attorney Tim Kelley Martin Palaniuk,Planner Mike Phillips Christina Janssen,Planner Susan Scott Joe Stoy Sam Wood Deanna Horton, Secretary of the Commission Commissioner Anderson moved to approve the January 22, 2015 amended agenda as presented The motion passed with a seven to zero vote. Commissioner Anderson moved to approve the January 08, 2015 minutes as presented. The vote on the motion was seven to zero, the motion passed. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioner Wood reported he attended the Spokane Home Builders Association government affairs meeting. He said the discussion was about form based codes and walkable urbanism. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Sr. Planner Lori Barlow informed the Commission the Planning Short Course had been scheduled for February 25, 2015 and was open for all to attend. She also said the Commissioners had a copy of the postcard which had been mailed city-wide announcing the two public meetings for the Comprehensive Plan visioning meetings. City Attorney Cary Driskell said although the Short Course would have some training on the Open Public Meetings Act and the Public Records Act,the legal staff would be bringing forward more in-depth training for the Commission on both of these subjects at the February 12,2015 meeting. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Public Hearing: CPA-2015-0001 A Comprehensive Plan amendment located on Nora Ave. between Pines and Mamer Roads. Before beginning the public hearings, Ms. Barlow asked the Commission how they would like to handle the public hearings. Options were to have the public hearings and deliberate after each public hearing or hold the public hearings and then deliberate after both were closed. The Commission chose to deliberate after both public hearings were closed. Chair Stoy opened the public hearing regarding CPA-2015-0001 at 6:17 p.m. Planner Christina Janssen gave her staff report regarding the citizen initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment to change four parcels from Office to Community Commercial. The property is owned by Jim Cross and Rainyday Dagaory LLC. The request is located on Nora Avenue between Pines and Mamer Road. The properties are bordered on the east and west by Office,south by High Density Residential and north by Regional Commercial. The site has remained vacant for some years and the owner believes the change will make the property more marketable. Commissioner Tim Kelley said the law firm of Witherspoon Kelly does community work with veterans which he recently had the opportunity to take part in. Commissioner Kelley asked Mr. 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 9 Driskell if having worked with Witherspoon Kelly would disqualify him from participating in the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Mr. Driskell explained it would be a matter of bias. In a case like Mr. Kelley had explained, a Commissioner would explain the circumstances to the rest of the Commission, and then determine if they would be able to consider the matter without bias. If not he would recuse himself and step out of the room while the matter was being discussed. If he could review the matter without bias, then he would state he could review the matter without bias and the Commission business would continue. Mr. Kelley said he felt he could review the matter without bias and stayed on the dais. Chair Stoy asked for anyone who wished to testify. Stanley Schwartz,W.422 Riverside Ave.: He was also an attorney for Witherspoon Kelly and had never met Commissioner Kelley, nor had he had any dealings with Mr. Kelley. Mr. Schwartz stated he was a representative for the property owners James Cross and Rainyday Dagator,LLC. Mr.Cross has two high-end dealerships. One is located in Spokane;the other is located in Boise,ID. Mr. Schwartz said he is an attorney in municipal real estate and planning law, is the City Attorney for Cheney and Airway Heights as well as he had a previous relationship with this City. Mr. Schwartz stated that the property had been posted, and the surrounding properties within 400 feet had notices mailed to them. He said he had checked with staff and was not aware of any comments which had been submitted in regard to the proposal. Mr. Schwartz stated the site was unique,with high density residential to the south up a steep slope, some commercial development to the west, and a Steinway showroom to the east. He said the site was at grade but subject to significant freeway noise and light and bordered Nora Avenue and the freeway to the north. Mr. Schwartz stated this area is not appropriate for residential. Mr. Schwartz stated he had submitted three documents for the record a letter from his client Mr. Cross, who owns two high end dealerships in Spokane and Boise, a market study he requested from NAI Black and a letter from himself summarizing the points in the other two documents. He said Mr. Cross' dealerships sell high end motor vehicles, such as Jaguar, Land Rover, Volvo, which are considered destination type of a dealership where customers search them out. The amount of traffic which can be expected would be for a destination type of dealership. Mr. Schwartz said this would be like someone searching out a specific department store for a specific item. He said this was different than how most people shop for a car up and down Sprague Avenue. He said this is significant in the sense of the amount of traffic which can be expected, and the draw which would be coming to this property. He said his client is requesting support of the map change to Community Commercial which is a bit of a down zone or a different zone than the Regional Commercial, which is across the street, in terms of what is allowed. This is a change in regard to the land use,which is for the future. Mr. Schwartz also said when it comes time for a building permit the property owners are prepared to meet with staff and perform all mitigation and traffic improvements warranted, as well as all on site improvements. Mr. Schwartz also submitted a market report from NAI Black regarding office vacancies in the valley. He said he had requested the study which summarizes in fall 2013 the City had the largest amount of office space at 3,280,000 square feet and the largest amount of vacant office space in the City of Spokane Valley,City of Spokane and Spokane's South Hill for market purposes. The vacancy rate for Spokane Valley was 21.56%in 2013; in 2014 it did decline to 18.32%. He said no one would be building for office space at this vacancy rate, unless it will be a very specific build to suit. Mr. Schwartz said this zoning still had a long way to go to recover to get to a healthy office market. He said he believed the property could be put to a higher and better use. The report also says retail is improving. The report supports the property will not be developed as office within the foreseeable future. He said with 632,000 square feet of office space available, the report suggests why the office zoning is not working. Mr. Johnson, President of NAI Black stated in his letter Spokane Valley had a long way to go to recover to get back to a healthy office market. The property owner does feel the change will not interfere with the uses in the area but will create jobs and create 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 9 stimulus in regard to sales tax. The property owner feels he can put the property to a higher and better use. The use will be more compatible to the surrounding area and uses. Mr. Schwartz said the staff report is comprehensive and supportive. The application meets all of the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan. He pointed out that one of the criteria for the change was the property must be adjacent and contiguous to the same or higher commercial use. When looking at the zoning code adjacent also means corner touches and it includes the corner touching and in the conjunctive includes property located across the public right-of-way to the same or a higher zoning classification(SVMC 19.30.030). He said there is no question I-90 is a public right-of-way, there is no question Nora is a public right-of-way, and this is then across the street. He said he included the definition of adjacent in this letter, which is lying near or close to but not necessarily touching. He also noted that the case law is that there is the presumption is that the property owner has the free and uninhibited right to use their property in a manner to make it economically feasible and viable. He said since 2006 this property and the property next to it has been underutilized and underserved. He thanked the Commissioners for the time to go through the information he provided. He said again there were no objections from staff or other property owners. He said he hoped the Commissioners would make a positive recommendation to the City Council. Commissioner Anderson asked if the applicant purchased the property knowing it was zoned office. Mr. Schwartz responded this was correct. Commissioner Anderson then asked if Mr. Schwartz's client accepted Nora Avenue as sufficient for his proposed business as he plans. Mr. Schwartz said at this point he did not know. However,what he did know and felt staff would support was the question at this point does not relate to what improvements are going to be necessary on Nora Avenue,or next to Evergreen, or Pines Road, or another adjoining roadway,as a result of the development. What his client will do and what standard practice is when the building permit is applied for,the client will fill out a SEPA checklist which will likely include a transportation study. Staff will look at the transportation study and determine what mitigation, and what improvements will be necessary in order to make Nora Avenue able to serve the adjoining land use. He said it will be incumbent upon his client to spend money and resources to hire professionals and fix or build-out Nora Avenue according to the studies which will be obtained from traffic engineers as approved by the staff. This could include off-site improvements all the way to Evergreen Road, it may include Pines Road, it may include the payment of impact fees,all these things his client is fully aware of and fully prepared to undertake in order to use this land as he has requested. Commissioner Anderson said he understood the requirements at the time of development but what he was asking was, does Nora Avenue as it currently sits meet the client's transportation needs to operate his business. Mr. Schwartz said he was not trying to dodge the answer, Mr. Anderson said it was a simple yes or no question. Mr. Schwartz said he was not privy to a transportation study because one was not required at the time of this application or at any other time as this process has proceeded. Mr. Schwartz said it was his understanding when development occurs, his client will adjust Nora Avenue. Mr. Schultz stated everyone was aware that motor vehicles would be moving in and out of semi-trucks, he knows Nora Avenue is of a certain width. He said he could make an assumption semi trucks already travel on Nora Avenue because Steinway Piano must get deliveries somehow. Commissioner Anderson asked if the market study from NAI Black,was studying what was in the Office zone,which the City allowed more than `offices' uses in it, or was the study just for offices. Mr. Schwartz confirmed it was just"office buildings"in the study. Commissioner Stoy asked if the marketing study mentioned marketing was a problem in area along Nora. He commented the properties along Nora Avenue do not have for sale signs on them. Mr. Schwartz commented he knew the residential properties had for sale signs; he also said any buyer would do their due diligence and check the zoning of the property. Commissioner Anderson asked if the NAI Black study equated vacant office space, not vacant property. Mr. Schultz this was vacant office square footage within office buildings. 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 9 Commissioner Wood commented he had driven by the property, which cannot be accessed when heading south on Pines. He said there were two for sale signs on the property which have been there for some time, so they were marketing the property. Commissioner Scott asked if Mr. Schwartz's clients looked at any property which was zoned for a car dealership. She said there are areas of the City which are zoned for car dealerships; the city has an Auto Row and property along Sprague Avenue where dealerships are allowed. Mr. Schwartz said he had actually worked on the CARMAX deal, and went through the due diligence for that purchase, so he does know about that area of the City. He said his client did look at the area along Auto Row,and his client did not feel his brand would fit into that area, nor did the client find the location or configuration for the type of dealership he would be developing. Therefore his client looked at this property and felt it was an ideal opportunity,given the state of the zoning since 2006. Commissioner Scott asked if he had looked at any other property with freeway exposure. Mr. Schwartz said he was not aware of other property along the freeway. Ms. Barlow reminded the Commissioners although it was interesting to consider the possible development on the property they should be focusing on the land use designation, and the question is the location suitable for the uses under the proposed designation. Seeing no one else who wished to test, Chairman Stoy closed the public hearing on CPA-2015- 0001 at 6:53 p.m. Public Hearing: CPA-2015-0002 A Comprehensive Plan amendment located on the northwest corner of Mission Avenue and Flora Rd. Chairman Stoy opened the public hearing for CPA-2015-0002 at 6:54 p.m. Planner Marty Palaniuk presented the staff report regarding this citizen initiated Comprehensive Plan amendment to change two parcels from Low Density Residential (LDR) to Mixed Use Center (MUC). The applicant is Patricia Abraham. The site is located on the northwest corner of Mission Avenue and Flora Road. It is bordered on the north and east by Low Density Residential and south and west by Mixed Use Center. The site is just east of the street vacation which the Commission just recommended for approval. Mr. Palaniuk commented the staff report had been updated to reflect the Spokane Transit Authority(STA)route is one mile from the area,and STA plans to add service to the area which is noted in the STA Comprehensive Plan. The staff report also added the other subdivisions in the area to show the impacts on the area. The staff report had been revised from the draft which the Commissioners had received for the study session. Mr. Palaniuk said staff had not received any written comments as of that evening. Mr. Palaniuk pointed out Flora Road is a minor arterial south of Mission Avenue. North of Mission Avenue, Flora is considered a collector. Mission Avenue is also considered a minor arterial. Commissioner Anderson commented he understood the staff report had been modified, but he wanted to point out STA would only be adding a bus route if voters approved a 0.03% tax increase. Mr. Palaniuk said STA does have a plan,and this was listed in their plan. The City could not say if they would or would not be able to implement the plan. Mr. Anderson stated again for the Commission this(the tax)would be how it would be implemented. Commissioner Wood asked for some of the uses which would fall under the Mixed Use Center zoning. Mr. Palaniuk said some of the uses which would be allowed would be multifamily residential, self-service storage units, some small scale commercial uses, convenience store. He said without the use matrix in front of him he did not want to guess any further. He said there would not be any industrial or light industrial type uses in this zoning. Manufactured home parks would not be allowed in the proposed zoning, but would be allowed in the R-3 zoning which the property is currently zoned. Commissioner Wood asked about retail stores, gas stations and marijuana stores. Mr.Palaniuk said some retail stores,gas stations in relation to a convenience store would be allowed. 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 9 Marijuana stores would be permitted in the zone but would need to meet all other special criteria before it could be sited. Commissioner Graham inquired as to where access from the property would be taken. She wondered if it would only be onto Flora Road or if it would be allowed onto Mission Avenue as well. Mr. Palaniuk responded this would be determined at the time of the building permit,and would depend on what was being proposed. Commissioner Kelley asked if low income residential would be allowed. Mr. Palaniuk asked what he considering, Mr. Kelley said he was referring to an apartment complex. Mr. Palaniuk said multifamily is an allowed use in the Mixed Use Center zone. Ms. Barlow commented she understood the question was about if apartments would be allowed, but the City's residential zoning districts do not distinguish between the types of residential units are being proposed. Chair Stoy asked for anyone who wished to testify. Patricia Abraham, 1920 N Greenacres Road: Ms. Abraham stated she was the applicant and representing the property owners, Jayn Courchaine and Donald Fisher. She said the intent for requesting the change is to create continuity in the zoning throughout the area, along Mission and Flora. It would also increase their options for future development, which would complement the growth happening within our neighborhood. Ms. Abraham said she was a resident within the neighborhood, having spent a majority of her life in this neighborhood. She is aware of the growth which is occurring and of the traffic concerns other neighbors might have. Her intent is not to increase the housing or create a traffic problem for the neighborhood. Commissioner Wood asked if Ms. Abraham owned the parcel on the very corner of Mission and Flora. Ms.Abraham said her mother owns the larger parcel and when she went to talk to the neighbor who owns the corner parcel he did not oppose the change but asked to be included in the change. Commissioner Anderson asked if the residents would be moving from the property. Ms. Abraham said the residence on her mother's property is used as a rental and the current resident just bought a home. The home on the corner property is still being lived in by the property owner. Ms. Horton said she had been given three letters which needed to be entered into the record from Cecil Russell, 17504 E. Montgomery; Eric House, 1711 N. Flora Road; Joseph and Lynda House, 17406 E. Montgomery. All three letters asked that the request for the Comprehensive Plan amendment be denied and the zoning be left as is. Mr. House said the properties needed to remain Low Density Residential to create a buffer for the rest of the neighborhood. Seeing no one else who wished to test fy Chair Stoy closed the public hearing on CPA-2015-0002 at 7:11 p.m. Commissioner Wood asked for the location of the addresses in the letters in relation to the subject properties,which were located for him. Commissioner Anderson stated he did not plan to recuse himself because he could make an open- minded decision, but wanted to let everyone know he knows Mr.Joseph House very well,and he did not know he was in the audience. Commissioner Wood confirmed the hearing had been closed so Mr. House would not be able to comments. Discussion regarding CPA-2015-0001: Commissioner Anderson wanted to know what the Commission needed to do in order to delay the discussion on CPA-2015-0001 so the Commission would have time to digest the information which was provided by Mr. Schwartz. Ms.Barlow said the public hearing has been closed; there would not be any action necessary. Commissioner Anderson asked it if was possible to request a zone change, is there any reason why there can't be a use added to an existing zone. Ms. Barlow said this subject was not before the 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 9 Commission at this point in time. It could be a separate action unto itself. However,the two actions could not be combined. He explained he was just asking if the direction was to go either way in a system, if it was asked. Ms. Barlow said it could be a simple application for a code text amendment to add uses as long as it was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. If the use was not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan then a Comprehensive Plan request would be necessary to add that use. Mr. Driskell added it would be substantially different than what was requested by the applicant here and the deadline for making requests is November 1' of each year. He felt the suggestion would qualify as a different request and would need to go to a next year. Commissioner Anderson asked if a code text amendment could only be done once a year, or it any time of the year. There was much dialog to make sure the meaning of Mr. Anderson's question was clear. A code text amendment adding a use to a zoning district,as long as the requested use was consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,can be proposed at any time of the year. Chair Stoy asked the Commissioners their preference for proceeding with CPA-2015-0001. Commissioner Anderson said no motion was necessary to postpone the discussion for this amendment, and this is what he would like to do. Ms. Barlow said there was no motion necessary to delay any further discussion on the item, but a motion was needed to begin discussion. Commission Anderson asked if they needed consensus to delay the discussion, and Ms. Horton concurred. Chair Stoy asked the rest of the Commission how they felt and Commissioner Wood said he would like to move ahead. He felt he had gotten enough information in two meetings, a public hearing, all the documentation he had received he said he has reviewed it all. He sees no reason to delay his decision. He is prepared to move ahead on this and he feels it is appropriate for us to do so,based on the people who are applying for this so they can do whatever they have to do. Ms. Barlow suggested Commissioner Wood could make the motion regarding moving the amendment forward. Commissioner Wood moved to recommend approval of CPA-2015-0001. As a point of information Ms. Horton said a motion could be made now to postpone the discussion. Commissioner Anderson moved to postpone the discussion of CPA-2015-0001 to the 02-12-15 meeting. Chair asked for discussion on the motion to postpone. Commissioner Kelley said he felt the planner had done a good job presenting the material the last two weeks. Commissioner Graham said receiving Mr. Schwartz's information that evening she would like to have two more weeks to understand what she is reading. Commissioner Phillips said he was not in favor of getting all the information at the meeting and being expected to read it and make a decision, and he is in favor of waiting. Commissioner Scott stated she would like a chance to go through the information. Commissioner Wood said he was ready to move ahead.Commissioner Stoy felt he would like to have the opportunity to review new material. The Chair called for the vote. The vote on the motion to postpone was six to one with Commissioner Wood dissenting. The motion to postpone the discussion passed Discussion for CPA-2015-0002: The Commission paused and Ms. Barlow asked the Commission if they were ready to move forward with the discussion on the next amendment. Commissioner Anderson said he did not want the planner to feel like he was being picked on with this by the book, legitimate by the effort, discussing Mixed Use Centers, in the staff report. Commissioner Anderson said he looks at it this way and it (Comprehensive Plan)says we have ton of minor arterial intersections with public transit in the City that are all residential. We are not converting them to mixed use just because of that. He understands it is useable(criteria)but he doesn't understand it as a reason. He said he has lived by many of them (the intersections). He said he already mentioned STA,they do have plans to move out there but only if there are additional funds from the public. Commissioner Anderson said we are not reviewing a 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 9 land use, we are just looking a specific zoning change, and in his opinion a MUC multiple use will increase traffic more than residential. He continued during discussion there was a comment, 'if you look this way you will see mixed use,if you look that way you will see mixed use.' if you turn around and look you will see residential and even in the mixed use, the majority of the construction near Flora Road or near the intersection is residential. He said there is a medical facility down the road, but even where we have mixed use, the development we have is residential. He asked Mr. Palaniuk the staff report says landscaping separating mixed use from residential would be Type I, but he does not know what that means. Mr. Palaniuk stated any commercial development up against residential, would be required to meet setbacks and would require Type 1 screening which would be a six-foot site obscuring fence and a five-foot vegetative strip which at maturity would need to reach six feet. Commissioner Anderson said six-foot vegetation was only as tall as the fencing. Commissioner Anderson said his final the possibilities of uses on the property are humongous. The current land owners probably have good intentions, etc. But good intentions can fail, finances can change, new property owners can acquire property. He continued, on the edge of or even in a residential area we have the possibility of, he didn't think we will have a golf driving range but there is a possibility of one. Mr.Anderson said there is a very substantial list of uses(which are allowed in this zone)and he has a very difficult time saying ok we will just call this mixed use and whatever happens,happens in the future. This is where he finds his difficulty. Ms. Barlow said she was not advocating one way or the other, however one of the key points Mr. Anderson made was this proposal is on the edge of residential. While the question being posed is determining what the best development options would be on this property, it is in a unique situation where there has been a considerable amount of development and it is along busy roads. There is commercial development in one direction,multifamily in another direction,single family surrounding a lot of it. What is the best way to develop this last little buffer piece? She said it could go either way. She said a case could be made for either to be that final bit of development,but it is not going to be perfect either way. However when you are contemplating the uses allowed in the mixed use zone, it is not going to pull them into the neighborhoods. It is only going to pull them to a point where there is already that traffic passing by. Commissioner Graham said she would agree with Ms.Barlow's suggestion to some point,except part of one parcel goes behind another property owners land. She said the property owner facing on Flora would have mixed use behind them, when now they have residential behind them. She said she walked the area this afternoon and currently there is an empty field behind them. Potentially they could have multifamily or a commercial development bumping up to their property line,or within the setbacks. Mr. Palaniuk informed the Commission this parcel fronting Flora Road is owned by the same person who owns the large parcel in the request. Commissioner Stoy wanted to know if fuel (sales) would be permitted in the Mixed Use Center. It was confirmed it is allowed. Commissioner Graham asked to revisit the transportation issue and lack of sidewalks if they are using the STA as their form of transportation. If and when STA receives their tax she said, then it would be fine, however until then services are a mile away down Mission and there are no sidewalks. She said a mile away south on Flora,there are no sidewalks. The only access with sidewalks is to the west towards the mall. She said this was one of the things she is taking into consideration. Commissioner Stoy remarked sidewalks come with development of property. Commissioner Graham said she understood but only in front of that small portion of the property. She said this does not address the safety concerns for the public which may be accessing the property from the bus routes which are only available a mile away to the south,east and west. As the Commission paused, Ms. Barlow asked them if they needed additional information, if they needed more time. Commissioner Stoy commented he was trying to read the information from STA. Ms. Barlow said the STA proposal to add service in the area is not predicated on whether or not this piece is developed, but on their funding and the use by persons who live or work in the area already 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 9 occurring. Part of the reason we only require the improvement for the frontage associated with development, she said, is because the City looks to offset the cost of the impact. There is already impact going on based on the existing residential development and the existing businesses which are developing in this area. They(the property owners)would only be required to pay for their fair share of improvements. Mr. Driskell added he looked at an overhead map and of the area to the east. He said there are interspersed sidewalks in different areas. The reason for this is the area is developing in bits and pieces. He explained the way the City gets its sidewalks is when we have development we require frontage improvements for that property for their impacts. Then over time, we get connectivity. You will see there is a fair amount of sidewalk to the east, but this is just part of the process. If this were approved, the City would consider the frontage improvements along Flora, and this would become yet another piece of sidewalk connectivity,said Mr.Driskell. Then there was considerable discussion regarding the impact of making a positive motion opposed to making a negative motion, and the need to be able to create findings to support the motion which is made. After the discussion it was determined the best course of action would be to make a motion to approve, take a vote and determine the outcome. If the motion does not pass, then a motion to deny could be made. Mr. Driskell said this would give a more natural flow for findings. Commissioner Kelley moved to recommend approval of CPA-2015-0002 to the City Council. Commissioner Wood said he foresees this corner of Flora and Mission to be a busy corner,especially when the bus comes through. He said the parcel on the corner seems a natural flow for MUC. He said if you look at the corner it is south MUC and it seems like a natural transition to MUC. It does not seem odd or like spot zoning, making the change ties it all up. He does not feel there will be any more negative impacts than is already there. He said he did not see any reason to deny it. Commissioner Scott asked if the request is approved, does it approve all the possible uses which are allowed in the zoning district. She said some will have a bigger impact than others but we can't know what use we are approving this for. Some could be more acceptable than others, but it is all or nothing. Ms. Barlow confirmed this was correct. The Commission was approving the range of uses which may be possible in the zoning district. Ms. Barlow said the fact the Commission is aware of the use being proposed in the other Comprehensive Plan amendment is irrelevant information. She said once the decision is made, it does not bind a person to the use which you thought was being proposed. Commissioner Stoy said he felt this was a natural progression, and the progression will stop at Flora Road. He said the amount of additional traffic this small portion would add would be insignificant to the rest of the area. He said eventually bus stops would come out there, and eventually sidewalks would be extended out. The staff report states landscape are buffers required, and he said there are height restrictions,which he thought was 50 feet in this zone. Mr.PaIaniuk said there is a height limit in the Mixed Use zone, and there is a relational setback for multifamily. Commissioner Stoy said he was in favor of the change. Staff clarified the setback would be 20 feet for this zone, and the height would be 60 feet for Mixed Use Center. The Chair called for the vote. The vote on the motion, by the show of hands, to recommend approval of CPA-2015-0002 was four to three with Commissioners Anderson, Graham and Phillips dissenting. Planning Commission Findings of Fact for STV-2014-0001: Commissioner Anderson moved to approve the Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations for STV-2014-0001, as presented. Ms.Barlow distributed revised findings of fact. She said the change between the findings just handed out and the findings which were provided in the packet were on page 2 of 3, under the recommendations, item 5 in the document which was just handed out,contains the language from the original item 5 which the Commission voted on at the 01- 08-15 meeting. Ms. Barlow explained Item 5 under the recommendations states"the surveyor shall 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 8 of 9 locate at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way, with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane Valley Street Standards." She said this condition is a standard condition for street vacations,so it was incorporated into the conditions which were provided for your consideration. However in this unusual case where this isn't developed right- of-way,just an oddly shaped piece of property, which obviously has no centerline of the vacated right-of-way and this condition isn't appropriate. After you voted and approved the conditions, as attached,it was recognized this condition wasn't necessarily appropriate in association with this street vacation request. After you voted on it, it was dropped off the findings,without considering you had already taken action on this item with this condition as part of it. So the findings before you which now contain all the conditions which were acted upon and reflecting your motion to recommend approval with attached conditions. So this is consistent with what you acted upon. Ms. Barlow said staff would like the Commission to approve these findings as the findings of fact, if that is the Commission's direction. When the item is moved forward to the City Council, staff will recommend in their final action they drop this condition since it is not appropriate. She added the reason staff is doing it this way is, it is the cleanest way to move this item forward,rather than making a new motion and eliminating item 5,then having new findings to consider. Staff felt this would leave the cleanest trail as to what has happened. Commissioner Anderson clarified it would not change the motion currently on the table. Ms.Barlow confirmed this was correct. The vote on the motion to approve the Planning Commission findings and recommendations was seven to zero, the motion passed GOOD OF THE ORDER: There was nothing for the Good of the Order ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business,the meeting was adjourned at 7:59 p.m. Joe Stoy,Chairperson Date signed V/6&) Deanna Horton,Secretary 01-22-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 9 of 9 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO.07-009 RESOLUTION ADOPTING POLICIES FOR.IMPOSING VACATION CHARGES PURSUANT TO RCW 36.79.030 WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley has the authority to vacate roadways and right of ways pursuant to RCW 36.79.030; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley has the authority to charge for said vacations in an amount that does not exceed 50%of the full appraised value or for the full appraised value of the area vacated where the street or alley had been part of a dedicated right of way for over twenty five years or if the property was acquired at public expense;and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley wishes to establish a policy by which they determine the amount to be charged the benefited property owners of any such vacation. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING POLICY: SECTION 1. Policy. I. The cost for property received as a result of a vacation initiated by an adjacent property owner shall equal fifty per cent (50%) of the appraised value of the vacated property received. a. The appraised value shall be the same as the value of an equivalent portion of property adjacent to the proposed vacation as established by the Spokane County Assessor at the time the matter is considered by the City Council. b. If the value of adjacent properties differs, then the average of the adjacent property values per square foot will be used. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (I), the applicant shall pay the above- described fee only to the extent that it exceeds the cost charged by the City of Spokane Valley to initiate the vacation process, exclusive of any surveying or engineering costs that may be incurred by the applicant. 3. This charge shall be paid subsequent to council action and prior to recording the vacation with the Spokane County Auditor. 4. The City Council shall reserve the right to deviate from this policy upon the adoption of written findings of fact that demonstrate that the public interest shall be best served by an alternate approach. SECTION 2. This Resolution shall be in full force and effective immediately upon adoption. Resolution 07-009 Street Vacation Charges Page I of 2 Adopted this 10th day of July, 2007. 0.{40A;. aide.) Diana Wilhite,Mayor ATTEST% hristine Bainbridge,CI Clerk ~/ Approved aq.to Form: R . .;. ../ Office ti the City • ttomey Resolution 07-009 Street Vacation Charges Page 2 of 2 °'� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _ il �,' r v � jle BW 16,10N T ice. s �t ;r' , 1 ' . g REQUEST: ' • •. ' 1 1li -j . 3,688 square feet of area a.CL i.i-i u .:ii ri ,r; k to be vacated,. ` 2. Enhanced entry to the i < . ,-, ~2 ' trailhead and rt - _, e, ; 19 - � development; �� = 3. Provide delineation Q — i -5. -�--_ = between public & private mon v -+ ownership; and t:e , u wry ` • t -6'_i 4. Offset land lost by ICC .10,-TF.,-1-;,-.• 4,-= r :.t ^ ,., \ :;�_ dedication of ROW for _=� : .. -fit, .t ........,,,r„ ,. . ;-3 turnaround and parking •,. - - •,,, " �'� for trailhead (5,600sgft). m R. . y 4-- i ' 74 Vii :b •,...45,, f 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Reimbursement Resolution No. 15-001. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.40, 39.36, 39.46; Variety of Federal tax and securities laws. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: City Council has determined to construct a new City Hall. Proceeds to fund the land acquisition, design and engineering costs, and construction and equipment costs are anticipated to come from a combination of City general fund revenues and City bond proceeds. Currently and based on project budget, the City anticipates issuing tax-exempt bonds in the approximate amount of $8,260,000 in the latter half of 2015 to be used primarily for construction costs. The City has already incurred and paid costs for land acquisition and is in the process of hiring an architectural design firm. In general, under the federal tax rules, proceeds of tax-exempt bonds can only be used to pay for expenditures paid after the date the bonds are issued. However, bond proceeds may be used to reimburse the City for expenditures paid from City funds if the City adopts a reimbursement resolution no more than 60 days after the date of the expenditure that is going to be reimbursed from bond proceeds. The reimbursement resolution can also declare the City's intent to reimburse expenditures incurred during the period between the date the reimbursement resolution is adopted and the date the bonds are issued. The reimbursement resolution must describe the project and state the maximum amount of bonds that will be issued to reimburse expenditures. In general, a reimbursement resolution is no longer effective if the reimbursement bonds are issued more than 18 months after the latter, of the date of the expenditure or the date the project that the expenditure finances is placed in service. The reimbursement resolution is being presented to preserve the option for the City to use bond proceeds to reimburse City funds used to pay for the land acquisition and design and engineering costs that may be incurred between now and the issuance of the bonds. The City will only issue bonds in an amount that is supported within the budget, so the reimbursement resolution is primarily a method of preserving flexibility for what may be financed with bond proceeds rather than a change in amount of bond proceeds. OPTIONS: Consensus to move Resolution No. 15-001 which is a reimbursement resolution under federal tax law, to an upcoming Council agenda for approval consideration; or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to move Resolution No. 15-001, which is a reimbursement resolution under federal tax law, to an upcoming Council agenda for approval consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A. The City anticipates issuing tax-exempt bonds in the latter half of 2015 in an amount that is supported within the existing budget. STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun and Erik Lamb ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Resolution No. 15-001 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 15-001 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, DESIGNATING CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM BONDS THAT MAY BE AUTHORIZED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY FOR ISSUANCE IN THE FUTURE, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley, Washington (the"City") issues tax-exempt obligations, including bonds, notes, and leases from time-to-time for the purpose of fmancing its governmental activities; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of the Treasury has promulgated Regulations limiting the ability of the City to use the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations for reimbursement of prior expenditures; and WHEREAS, any such declaration of official intent to reimburse must not be made as a matter of course or in an amount substantially in excess of the amount expected to be necessary for the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the passage of this Resolution allows the City, but does not require the City, to reimburse certain expenses related to the project described below, up to the amount listed herein with proceeds from the issuance of tax-exempt obligations; and WHEREAS, the City expects to finance the project described herein through the issuance of tax- exempt obligations; provided,the City will only issue as much debt as determined to be appropriate under its adopted budget and budgeting fiscal policies. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: Section 1. The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures described herein with the proceeds of debt to be incurred by the City(the"Reimbursement Bonds"). Section 2. The maximum principal amount of Reimbursement Bonds expected to be issued is$14,400,000. Section 3. The expenditures with respect to which the City reasonably expects to be reimbursed from the proceeds of Reimbursement Bonds will be made from a City Capital Projects Fund for project costs related to the purchase of real property for a new City Hall facility, design and construction of the new City Hall facility, and purchase of fixtures for the new City Hall facility. Section 4. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Resolution 15-001 Reimbursement Bonds Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Adopted this day of_March, 2015. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON Dean Grafos,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney Pacifica Law Group LLP,Bond Counsel to the City of Spokane Valley Resolution 15-001 Reimbursement Bonds Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2015 Department Director Approval ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Resolution 15-002: Release of Drainage Easement , 16927 East Euclid Avenue (parcel number 45121.9102) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.11.020 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: In 1996, a drainage easement was granted to Spokane County as part of the Lumber Products commercial project at 16927 East Euclid Avenue. The Lumber Products building was located on Lot 2 of Binding Site Plan (BSP) 87-17, and a portion of the storm water runoff was discharged into bio-infiltration swales within the easement area, for treatment and disposal on adjacent Lot 1 of BSP 87-17 (see Attachment 2). In 1999, Spokane County approved a Lumber Products building addition on Lot 1 over the existing drainage easement. The bio-infiltration swales were relocated and the existing drainage easement was proposed to be abandoned per the approved grading and drainage plan; however, the drainage easement was not abandoned so the building addition is located over the drainage easement (see Attachment 3). Upon incorporation in 2003, the City assumed the rights and responsibilities of Spokane County for the drainage easement at issue on Lot 1 of BSP 87-17. Development Engineering has reviewed the onsite bio-infiltration swales and determined that they are located on private property and receive only private stormwater runoff. Public Works has reviewed the stormwater facilities along Euclid Avenue adjacent to this property and determined that the onsite drainage easement is not necessary for public drainage purposes. The current property owner is selling the property and has requested that the City release its interest in the drainage easement. OPTIONS: Consensus to place Resolution No. 15-002 releasing drainage easement at 16927 East Euclid Avenue, on a future agenda for approval consideration; or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus to place Resolution No. 15-002 releasing drainage easement at 16927 East Euclid Avenue on future agenda for consideration. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Chad Riggs, Development Engineer ATTACHMENTS: 1. 16927 East Euclid Site Map 2. Lumber Products — 1996 Grading and Drainage Plan 3. Lumber Products— 1999 Grading and Drainage Plan 4. Copy of recorded drainage easement #4012906 5. February 9, 2015 Letter to Erik Lamb from Claudia Duncan 5. Proposed Resolution No. 15-002 releasing drainage easement at 16927 East Euclid Avenue. 6. PowerPoint Slides �''' 16927 E. Euclid � �' r4 cam' " ' 55063.0141 0 45016.9051 - ` w. Euclid Av . I 1: lip r 1 It L; .e 1110111 . . Il � e Ln 11 411*F \\ L r. — ,� I 11 -EXIST. DRAINAGE a.,4 e,. II !EASEMENT .r- I 45121.9104 i 11 ' ." _ "• s • it I 45121.9100 , 11 ._ • — .11L. 45121.9102 45121.9101 1' �r i fin 1 1 _ I II I I 11 t SPOK NE VALLEY . - -- - tilt 1 l� . ;.a . _ 1 . • r. . _..,0 ..,:, . ,. ., . 467. .- 45121.9103 ' F - i tr r: _ _ 16, Euclid Av 11 il 3, , .. ++11I1._... _.: . 11 .i211145121.9118 • 45121.9117 C2 1 ,, 45121.9119 a ��- I ., 114 ,, II �. .. . ,°.II �� / . 169.9 0 84.93 169.9 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an imm 1 Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may O not be accurate,current,or otherwise reliable. � TM1461._,© LUMBER PRODUCTS NISTALANN BASIN nRE 1 MP WROTE INSTALL CATIPI eAs1 TO.201450 INSTALL�>ER�,� CO.STA SMEET�4 ,� 1 . 85 GRADING, DRAINAGE AND TTM 1 PER SPORNE IS PEET 13-4 .201450 -i)STNl C-UM 1A-SI, TO-SM4E10 INSIN1 CAT.M BASIN TYPE 1 NSW.TVTE pi-Am CO.SW SHEETS-4 M.. - '� TTRE 1 PER SIT 0-4 ,r,-7,nR, _ UTILITY PLA N MANCE AMI EL.-2014.44 10-.2014.50 RISTALL 1C448.4!' W VD,2EET 8--4 PER �W 5 0.2EET 8 4 --r- 11 IY _- ,!'LE•WORM 15.LE_2Wv.45 o1 4.MAW nE-20 uPo S.12, T.25 H., R. 44E., W.M. _ le i.E-2909.73 a'7.E 34141. IY7.E-�014fe -MTgll 1YalY.� 1 _ .,may-X86 InE.-2PWss IRE. (CI 0 CFFPI.51 TVPF z 191`1[ Q S'LE.207395 PET S01IATE C0.STM.SNEIT IL-4 { IC5109.1 1rLE.2914..2 12"STOUAIrSTO400 1 .'5011.15 Q L-72.00 1!'4100 i-so 15-STORM 12.5TC4a1 t.,0.6RM L.11R00' J G.D090 lrBR94' L+60.T# C- W. L.'A.00 030074 PROTECT f9ST.FEH# M 30 15 0 TSA 60 L.Y I', Or. G•,D050 o-0950 00650 8.55.73' - - _ -�-- _ r. N cn)aP+T- SCALE FEET I W �� '..-.' .. .. , ;:- ^i. -' 'if. - - , .. .7.- - REMOVE COMM 1E AL-1 MCC E 40.5 Mr TELL 11 L7BST.cures , �a IIS Vin.:: t �,AISTALL*LEAN 0.71, •--. ''j7,1_, '' L A4E1 INSTALL«ETT - ,Q i , LEGEND SPOKANE A 4. 5li p V DRIVEWAY PER .. 'Sin 50TET U i3 - 5I 12"5304 1 -7u11--- out mom SAME 4.-4. i -�._. $10,SHEET 0-11 / c P1-1 • Wim,...A._ ..Qx [o lcud�i A0�MEE ry;W' aD.Yar[I S '` I �.w.l NET L10� L-1a�Zpp 1 b •�•�J EK11 oR111E1E o-cow v Aglk °� q. _ NOTE,• gg TEE.201075 lu � � % .. ,.� I# �'-OE..-._�- MNSi.OVERHEAD ELEC. 1r gOENc �'' M 53)4.1° >m sr , 1743 �.i ,.,,•. 3 LI. ER LEADER 1!R 12.45 _ .�.-:�._ �) MOLAL o-Aii CLE.2013.3] 3 I.E.-2913.41 E]TSI.FENCE 570.2MEFT'B�1h/O I t PRO:m y{+. P�En PAL-CLEAN 0.T`'# C 1.E-301479 • +r 75 t oP�a-x_. ik1T F'F1Mr£ 1grE;tr1.(.'` y SIO,SNEM'I R-12 2 J' 1��_ �� 1T .9°' .•SANITARY SETEx II • (•IRE EAST I TREE 6 TT X1.1.„ ,-- Y - II 421 11 LE ME NUM a l.wooP J - EbST.CURB $pp 1 ETd1STRIALT WiRL r ' RIO 0."3014.10 4'IMJ� PF1 1/2'TAMR ET E 'l 1C CE-2WR1- 1-.0.04uESPC ! •^ �. EI MP1E 7 NAM 1 two_TI, - MST.OURS MY SEE OWE B. LUMBER PRODUCTS - 1996 � � EAST- I I T E E I E �^TIA�S ' yII I iy 'dbi] •vi" =AADS t, 1 - i E]OSr.5101 we m FEE ! ' E�-;200. .= - - ------- I -' AI _ i �l9STIl1 YN9Li I✓<?YI CATCH 54191 1y�I �!S{:� :^. "'-L I I' MO.& prim Or STALE ( .P FIRE �` rirrG� 4'PSR 8.4.51 COUNTY FIFE F`1n . n.. ..I r f nal.. NEW SPOT EXMOOR ENS]NAM UE -_ •,. 7011 •.P ,&FIF ..1 L-934 DD \ h.'. -'7 212 2015..-.�__ � .. 0.0.5 EL 20,T,W'[7'VP,1: 5 `:``l'STOFAI 9E1dA mgA I �smwe 5. - I �f ��iI.1NiC.29033z 1 --� I-•_`- __. `A[PA:� 1�1I . 3914-.s - YR�EAn UE 0100 E EREST. .A! �. y^ SFEET-Al IMMI NEW 00 DRIVEWAY - P. ._._ - y fEETTVE P08r `"'►� - - S 0 - .t..iA.3P� NET OUKiE1E T - 4..-:I��'! �P:+�. _ 2014 --- 'i,� TET X1.50 1 49. .y ` ® NE1i'A4FIU4Lr I 3s r I II,. / B ' �/////�/r� Haar APINALT PATHWAY D O1 IQ -re1 T . - BEST.FETE RTOR4MTT- 3615: M NETAEiq MNL 'P6TALLJ 1111FI STRUCTURE T}ROOK [BI'OTHERS) --' -_-- -r ] _T OYnffE rf 4.14140.4.14140.-.„..__ - _ ` .:�-.,•1 1fFP4.A00014F 021604 I 99 5 _ II =RN W e A �' "n" `CR 444888 __ DRAINAGE EASEMENT ",�, PER SHEET B 1 0 j..--- _9015- - 51D,SHEET B--i LSO II ':� :•rTDM DF 51r. .99N. - I �.�_ -4Y EL 2007.00 PPAAMKAT 1 / V. F011RE SNyr ARF3 S 97'19',8•L - - . -•l�r��r� 1 .... r H2W- r0e.. rtA +rte 1111 r1�� 342•. ^ ._,•F J r_rr.0.2se 514.7 IiYTw�r r rrt�M�7 ��_��r. 6�EI�(J� -_ y -- Ili T 3'..CTCIONE SRM-��.IE.� `. ` - k. r �- ..9LET W up.m.LII i IPE 1 RACRO4.0 1. MATERIALS ANG'ISruLADON SNAL SE M 4.FOR CpMSTLYlleT411 W 4RYIIELLS.WALL BIER A TOTER UK INSTALLATION SMALL CONFORM T9 TRAMS T •E cm. ACCORDANCE WITH TE%KEARE CUONTT FARM(N10W 4845 OR APPROVED MALI WORMY Tic STCBNE PILISTAAL PAPA EDWA DS. 'CALL YOUBEFCO�+RpErtDIG' 1 TEC,1R 7,954.,A-2L WA. 5-TAN.AR)S FOR ROAD NO SEVER CpiSTR11C0PN ITE ORYRVL BNTII AND THE NAMED PRARROTS, F4$1, 8000 ' TOW.AND AS AMMO% AW FENCER THE NAMED CRAMPOON ATD TEE 10.4.SERER PIPE SHALL ER ASTM 03034 21R SS R R NATIVE SCRs. arl1RAC1ER MAL IATOeTT THE`SERER AT A 2.PLOYS WTI 005104 MITES ONTRA ON THE 01.64 0 1x!RADE MU THE EAST.SIDI 411E 701. 1•ASPN5 NABS ALE ESP1I40E 0 THE AIM All 3 SFE IRC1tllEe11N9V.511E PIAN PER�IENSd9NG POE F Tis 04 ROT PRTSTAL',TTN THE] I TORE R REgO11UIES FOR LOG29CALL PPE ES O CCNTRALY. 2TAiJ.CONTACT THE A /�4.5-1 541KR C'+ ¢T nTtF,UNF r0 v9" ✓•OT lAu r r...%2Eslilg Inc �.., (`_1 LITRI E'S SHALL MITES.EL NE MICR 9TO a IS 1E1 0 a1An D FALL•AROUND STD PEPoMMiMT BONES IWEpAIFLT. ''-..•.'..... 15-1.5-951 N clTu Orr`� �p^°v9T 1^.S6" uTTTT[5 5TNLr.1)E RELOCATED MICR TO 0S 10 REVLON AND SHALL NE(00110IET 004190 S p� RORIRVCTIOH• ARNALi AND[RAR/AGE FACRlIKS. OP ISITLOCTICAL 1 •,®ADDED REPLA .Or SNUE ATEA f9w1 RA .wT fax's]des¢. I L00RACI1S WOWED TO AYE ACOLEIE 7.Ofi1TRACTO11 TO RISME 5 1757 Or COMMFRIM 41, .. SET OF APPROVED GRAMS,DRAINAGE AHD 0TIM FT TCP IIF 041TM.PIPE C•14412)00A0E M Pe LUMBER PRODUCTS PLOYS 01 THE PCBSTE NlTEVER W0SIRUC001 ES IH PROWESS. A 0A0R41ATE 11.171 SERVICE LORAT215 4.w Ek>:YAT1rIs °YAM GRADING,DRAINAGE AND .IH s Wa 45 i DRr1: 1 25013 0.3E In UTLkN PLAN ...,...,0„._.m,� \ YL a 2Ne•A.1 deo- 1.n vn 0.110 7�1_ SEC. 12. T.25N., R.44E., W.M. s- am-- 1 LUMBER PRODUCTS x IS 1 66 ea kroVeAl ADDITION east.w DST S SD1,.w SCALE E_ w 0..9V14Y W A-pet l.7e IP9 A•6ota 7p w 0..131A.00 CONI A wf[RYAE•' .r.., GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN 1 1 T514-07/4766,60 ' Q1p 1 .� 1 �• " .EETam•19f.fe {,W �ne9 Y,L[AR}1NA]. f,L,Oufl•saiuw 9 MAL DRE.CO sErr<e Eon® NORM SCAT OF EIRE H1nRANT Pal a•Ew00 4,1 Rs 2-.Pr* w A•:MARCO. O LKw, OR LOT S LEGEND 1 Y r"[[ 1 1 I Ise 16,.,01.8 ar.9a.a DAL 116160.71-1-2407,94tsTlpwrT•L1,asT fr,>:iw}.Ea1nn 4r 0..21.1. 0.8017.9, { I x an t.a)mom. ,r0.•20,727 (USW DAnw1 o Ep9sT.stun KAN1gIE 1 ° ar -p.l a4•91%.‘ O MST ORWELL ❑1 - • : .!!!cI ®.ST.CONTOUR p i g `..1111: \ I / a°- '' - a} 00700 rEINE -r a-r- DM..FENCE illi I f►+ I ' o , z. ,1, y' �� . l _),,,,.50,_)- EGETsmRy NPR ° c � / 1 .�.ml r�« a� t r 1 --SSDOST:SMEARY SERER ... .,...1„... /\ r 'aVQ"a\C\1V"w��\.V.AC+.A AmaA��W�1.AY>.@a\Y\�.�Vb�A`4A.��A\A\ '\Y.A AR .A@.�.�\@V 4A \y@AA JA �� OCV . JP / \ Se -,1616-Y1 -- MST..A1FR I II .T.C•].I,.03 PM.ar.1a COM wrwo 6411 onAw • ENE Er DOT. '��t f -'FOas ms.Gus Ii +r' o0o dow r0_418s MIL.-20.79 R 1616+a .419 I 1 61 MST.msnnNY 1I . "' 1616.I^' f ° 7 '^ / etianuTe p�.. x.r + * MST.DONT eat i1 1 I 1 n nn.s n 1 , [ lJ$4G�1 LUMBER 1 P n{ .r 1 ooNTRACf6R m ENSUE Den POSER', COST,TREE eat II t P II ncTwry2nnn '� jr PG O®UC BMGL©D Lumber Products I ma Taws MP SIMS, -tea How caRall 1! ,�.f(I; I I i. • COTS.¢7EwAtx FIR s 2095 Addition - 1999 s e9 Mar, ` (�. V ll +' ! TO BE RDEDW rE2p966`.9d SG, iF-T III NEW OONO.SP1-AN,PAO I,0 JO JCL (4ryy As lemur. qs �I „ i6Q PROPOSED ELEvanEN1 ii 1 `I --.rQ+ NO AS ism mist re eC E,1 027 LM�vLIa9 8 J :2•SO PROPOSED STOW PPE A'h 11111.11__ I 1161,,,, �_ on 4:NSfRDLPON. APPETE SEE ws. N f! SET FENOWO I I+ \ • ,1 'A ppg`Np 4. \@.\\?\.�a\�\\ �� i \c:\ �r4a\�� a�\a\\`�a�V w�\aa�\a?a��:\e:� �qt Nei V M11g6L ler Q COORDINATE TALE LAI. I �L 161.E (4 •1616 . .I III II •• 4 • 1 nY O9fe1!'S O15UAEIIOIR Eby. E I+ 1 .ate, . ++ryrygq,. f 1816,41 PER SKEW + --. ff'-'- . �Im�tN"::: WYRT7 STA10AIapB I I MGM.swA c AREA ' 'ti .4,'",-4- -- _ au a-smuu @4111 6111 NDVIE PORAL PO MP • [ PROPOSED ASPHALT AREA !LJI !• wEr.Tr*F ` #LAvpq SEE IAGfAECP1RAL PI.Ne TOR OET Easi .,♦y ryr prml[i T .� RtY FL DE1243 qF 1'-410 ` .\'16,16 a�v� 49d' -��-rzot.- sm°`sn.Kr ca..,awre I • AREA TO BE RE-PAYED 'l 1 - --. 3 tis ' _ _ .- a,1 r -�.. xl r t.-i ,--7.1L.' I� 1. `I ',Sir,EA�Mr �i I _ -- --- �ReR aM `� 1..gaga rot ecosnurnw A.Kils WOAD a mum mac rv.rat 1,.,c.soea.ex 16 16 " 44310141 13.70 spwpNARY ORAiEl PROPOSED LUMBER w,...«ee SAP- 2oTa _ Y ✓asmc T.A .MITE WIT DE OM..To 10.041 1K SWAMI + a..nB 10166 1.111 NEW uta EAE:Amu.MISS a+A1l a NOT.ar Ol cpasfaacTKx MT. 0111E A. cATE ro POE,wMlauaa /. MD REE Er MON FRON p bt T. • 111'111, wsnlu....1 1+�I+• 411E 110141 BE 2'm Y N uAA�an 411.6 ,� -�'�a1 MOM 1=3.11:01,iaar .. `� Kamm u1..s E n.+u.,..1111 mNsnmc....nc Eaml.T.1010 x.> E on , i PSA. 1 i x MINN n s'rlxac PRODUCTS AD[NTI[ 1� p4RIDEEEIo:. Aua ERomN NW TO WC MO.mar I q[i f:°eaor ro I 1MDT..61rE COMM. R/NC a N 2 rCOM CACI x 4416 ma' e.wa a rev4H.ete FOR PROTECT**,Ni E..Imvrr ASA w,.a,enel II` II IN1 PER SADIUNE COURT A195 FF••"✓'1'-'~~- `2010 �! r Cl a / ■ PROMO NmRNIT r00nN M oAaee eatsttax�0 w lye etEAM.PRAM. � x l. manesYA. Y 1 4611 n.m a s6 s ! L M wy. 111.0.0.ECC. r 100.1.ALL 6,610E MO�R cal Ra i� +17I III +"� Lr 1118 LEANN 56,8$0 90.F f. 1 TO WEN Na 101-1SPARENL AMMO ro.emu Neer6T ALL 6116. l I+i 111I •'''' N'11,.., :* 044 TOREr]OE1J'a >r ' rli�' Pm ▪ ' elwtnMRs MTM Ewer RN..[v a RM.KIND No MOW Mw ` [mi.sxu[ n - S•• - 10°'1 -- 1 ..c KM. I 1111 A.pffi W a 4' Rsr, RSA SROM US m .aaa;it 181961 a zP an.p prRm.N a.A Acs 11ti1 1 1111 kms x°63 sa p�E7-xaoua hal„17.1.71,arr a osau..m,aDN� S' 1616 a CIDDXa1 WPC s m R RM®a.DK OM a MM.POOR Eula Nn - 16 16 - MLR MRse.1067Er o E DArt6,IKv°O MI 11.E EIRADLUX aWORMS DITIOugEe ew»K TREAT 11}11f 1 !1+ ' j �..:�`� `ua` 1cr � »+�w ML IuIPMASS Sa POR 80111 Red.SAL a POMC NMI SE SAYS nT18 .,s,.�R�mea'aTwYaa.e��a�.EE Ii+1ii�L _R_�; , Ii;, , .� , f �'s ' Drainage Easement . ,+.I. .•..� _ - Sfi.sCnAREAITONO EhS19lC 'ti I 2Ui aairt�w^�---.irr-/ 6467.6368 4214 71.31I 113469703 01E167120 i 1 EMAP IL 113 ..raK�_ -..-r RMr,moo 94.3.,169 _ 701.4A7 ....,� ' !<X Pw R/t.-M 9427.1.114 .ADO - ., !� II"!/ i U� 44 007.1829 66 MEAN/ `4--��=1MN/MEI1 oKMNamEEME�^^�-r�r�� 5.-i AES - y .Y 96p3,rg71 668.3113- `------- '�'�--ee--.....IM .��4 • 9�p9�9.p,�7ye�6. SO]9-7u19 -f - sr R---lei Ni AS.RE DEMISE=- 12 , 1 6683.2 www SE.T FEHINHO'AS SHONE TO ,C r•.4: 'aIle` 64111..0.111110 111101 AVEC,OR 'r- ) s PRO ECT mono sots AREA- ifiliM a MUM APETO UI12 9 NOMA t.An.DATE .MO DISTAL A1NN I IIAL PE s 1.oan.ACM 1 mom m cove A=FLOE I 8,4O.Im.be s21W.966 68aR01110 M /__El.. fiy.ail.,dr 4:4407.68.n,SW Wad 01LEITT POT op en e/P.w16 6RNaK.p.uge.NO MCP rooms tett TEND MC'.PIKS Od11.....°. a RAPS MSC A06 sic a4OK1R aN6Inleno 16 M .Emma MAN INI Rag'PROM IRE laaaTR Rx41S1q{8 J 16 16SHEET". Dane ADOESI Mn AS M MUS PROSEI S s IP 810E Mo.Nu EE T..n.®ORM. -w""".,,P,...,.,.tR..- - 11,Taylor H gine ring I c mnmPeral uu wom 4 a.0 ,+u sm • 1008*It.near*unrx.slaw 01 DC 04.4.144.114.......EOM_nM a.GaTalcml n Et00ffl Rwt m�u�R 011001:Y00 610 `°011.=...-t-'1,==. •• x P.m eu AnxnweE axnunw r /mew.e..a.AFawm Egue6 anent Na•Emm urn 00 455-8000] • K aw>I•t 9."•u"'I.rl..`o AN1ECM EX 1•.w OI RiYGtMLC rets LEDO.ALL r,4 MAW.EME.E M.nK 4RaED...m4 OE CALL MAWR S AMS.kr El:ArA Mm F.Z a 1810E [epl ase-8114 1.90....101011. Ater'oEtE. Tom mom. onvo,wok Ran uO 10 o ann6uat Wv, SHAMS 100..14041 AIO 111421.4 u NIL 0141E MOM= .0.�a�.a..«tr..,.... LPICIE leD AL v MR..=rw MP MP.a1O61 refinEIl W1,a apes>K CR 11.N.A.E.DAO I.4.4*Do.Mem Mr ee, m. IML y -- L Ili. I mIGT 14A3l PRODUCTSR*1 ADC]PLN !6/. 7 OSA' I DARE: '�B° MACA®AND aRAEAGE PLAN 11.0: NM- I :ATE: IL tit.i+..a• e KEA IT A Log in Date:5/�s`1Jg6 puool ar k.5l,,1 • 91 o t RoadName&No: l; (721q T Purpose:�-y •_, Prepared By:14jt& Rog By:(Land Rev).1 14,Aud.•) JJII1f 1111111111111111111 �age�zsos 01,0 1946 1 ,0.04A CO IS FAS 10,00 Spokane Co,IR SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING Spokane County,Washington DRAINAGE EASEMENT The Grantors,Lumber Products,an Oregon Corporation,for and in consideration of Mutual Benefits,the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,grants to Spokane County,a political subdivision of the State of Washington, an Easement over, under, upon and across the hereinafter described lands situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington: AFFECTS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO.45121.9102 That portion of Lot 1 of Altered Spokane County Binding Site Plan No.87-17,as per Nat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of Binding Site Plans, Page 22-A, Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Lot I;thence N.89°36'55"E.,along the North line of said Lot 1,30.00 feet;thence S.00°21'00"W.,310.00 feet; thence S.89°49'04"E., 159.51 feet, to the East lone of said Lot 1;thence S.02°15'03"E.,along the East line of said Lot 1, 115.00 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot I;thence N.89°49'04"W., along the South line of said Lot I and the North right of way line of Euclid Avenue,214.73 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot I; thence N.00°21'00"E., along the West line of said Lot 1, 671.96 feet to the Point of Beginning. Area=48,077.68 square feet. The Easement granted to Spokane County and its authorized agents is for the sole purposes of allowing natural drainage and/or runoff over and across the above described lands. The Grantor(s)hereby agree not to obstruct, artificially collect or discharge the flow across or adjacent to the above described lands. The Grantor(s) agree that Spokane County accepts no responsibility for maintaining the drainage Easement. The Grantor(s) accept complete and total responsibility for the construction and perpetual maintenance of the facilities located within this drainage Easement per plans on file in the office of the Spokane County Engineer. The Grantor(s) hereby releases Spokane County, and all its officers, employees, and agents from any responsibility or liability for any damage whatsoever including inverse condemnation by or to any and all persons or property arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the storm drainage within said Easement. The Easement described hereinabove is to and shall run with the land. No modification of the boundaries of said Easement can be made without the prior approval of Spokane County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this instrument to be executed on this �7 day of �\O , 1996. By: /!�¢ti ? C/L By: PI. T, imp{ -over- ••i�•• fi ie ••I• 141,' I 4. t L/kihl/II//////III/!IIIIiihiiIIIJ/iIIIIIthIIlI 41rl4r1996 Ets 10:14,4 $4.00 Spokane Co, STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE )ss I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Kr,!TV, 110 (is/are)the individual(s)who appeared before me,and said individual(s)acknowledged that(he/she/they)signed this instrument, on oath state that (he/she/they) (was/were) authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the AU1L,x ?4--- of LU knc z c oC Ca4)nk c\.9 to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. Dated this day of csA , 1996. _ I OTARY C KYLE R. MCKEON I and for the State of Washington, STATE OF WASHINGTON residing at Spokane. NOTARY PUBLIC My appointment expires " loR My Commission Expires 8-LU-99 ky( Katten Katten Muchin Rosenman LIP 525 W.Monroe Street Chicago,IL 60661-3693 312.902.5200 tel 312.902.1061 fax www.kattenlaw.com CLAUDIA B.DUNCAN claudia.duncan@kattenlaw.com (312)902-5427 direct (312)902-1061 fax February 9,2015 Via FedEx and Email Erik Lamb Deputy City Attorney City of Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Avenue, Suite 103 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Email: erik.lamb@spokanevalley.org Re: 16927 E. Euclid,Spokane,Washington (the "Property") Mr. Lamb: I am working as attorney for General Electric Credit Equities, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("GE"), in connection with certain matters relating to the referenced Property. As you may know, GE has been made aware that a certain Drainage Easement in favor of Spokane County was granted over a portion of the Property and recorded on July 10, 1996 in the official records for Spokane County; Washington as Recording No. 4012906 (the "Recorded Document"). A copy of the Recorded Document is attached to this letter as Exhibit A for your reference. It is our understanding that the Recorded Document was rendered redundant when the County of Spokane approved the "Lumber Products Addition Grading and Drainage Plan" for the Property, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, with such plan clearly indicating on its face "Spokane County Drainage Easement to be Abandoned". It is also our understanding that the City of Spokane Valley (the "City") is the political body that has inherited all easements and plans from the County of Spokane since the City was incorporated in 2003. GE is in the process of trying to sell the subject Property to a third-party purchaser, which purchaser desires that the Recorded Document be vacated and released of record. Therefore, please consider this a formal request on behalf of GE that the City execute and deliver to GE a recordable vacation and release of the Recorded Document. Once the City has had a chance to review this request, I would appreciate it if you would contact me at the phone number or email address above to advise on the City's estimated timing for delivery of a release. If you need any additional information or have any concerns about this request in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. AUSTIN CENTURY CITY CHARLOTTE CHICAGO HOUSTON IRVING LOS ANGELES NEW YORK ORANGE COUNTY SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA SHANGHAI WASHINGTON,DC LONDON:KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN UK LLP A limited liability partnership including professional corporations US 102110325v2 214590-00608 Katten Katten Muchin Rosenman!La February 9,2015 Page 2 Regards, Claudia B. Duncan Enclosures cc: Chad Riggs, PE, City of Spokane Valley(via email: chad.riggs@spokanevalley.org) Patrick Barclay, City of Spokane Valley(via email: pbarclay@spokanevalley.org) Jim Howard, GE Capital Real Estate(via email:jim.howard@ge.com) Russ Johnson, CBRE(via email: Russ.Johnson@cbre.com) US 102110325v2 214590-00608 DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 15-002 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, RELEASING THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY'S INTEREST IN A DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 16927 EAST EUCLID, SPOKANE VALLEY; AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, Spokane County Binding Site Plan No. 87-17 ("BSP 87-17") was platted in April, 1989,and was subsequently altered in December, 1989; and WHEREAS, after BSP 87-17 was platted, Lumber Product granted Spokane County a public drainage easement over a portion of BSP 87-17 (recording number 4012906)on July 9, 1996;and WHEREAS, in 1999, Lumber Products prepared a drainage plan and constructed improvements which provided for drainage in locations other than over the granted drainage easement; and WHEREAS,the City of Spokane Valley(the "City")incorporated on March 31,2003; and WHEREAS, upon incorporation, the City of Spokane Valley assumed the rights of Spokane County to the drainage easement located over BSP 87-17; and WHEREAS, the current owner of property subject to BSP 87-17, General Electric Credit Equities, Inc., desires for the City to release the drainage easement as it is unnecessary and drainage is provided by other means on BSP 87-17; and WHEREAS,it is not necessary for the City to hold this drainage easement. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington,as follows: The City releases any interest it may have in the drainage easement located on the property described in Exhibit A, 16927 East Euclid, Spokane Valley, Spokane County parcel number 45121.9102, and authorizes the City Manager to execute any necessary documents to complete that process. Adopted this day of March,2015. City of Spokane Valley Dean Grafos,Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 15-002 Releasing Drainage Easement—16927 East Euclid Page 1 of 2 DRAFT Exhibit A That portion of Lot 1 of Altered Spokane County Binding Site Plan No. 87-17, as per Plat thereof recorded in Volume 1 of Binding Site Plans,Page 22-A, Spokane County,Washington,being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Lot 1;thence N.89°36'55"E., along the North line of said Lot 1, 30.00 feet;thence S.00°21'00"W., 310.00 feet;thence S.89°49'04"E., 159.51 feet,to the East line of said Lot 1;thence S.02°15'03"E.,along the East line of said Lot 1, 115 feet to the Southeast corner of said Lot 1;thence N.89°49'04"W.,along the South line of said Lot 1 and the North right of way line of Euclid Avenue,214.73 feet to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1;thence N.00°21'00"E.,along the West line of said Lot 1, 671.96 feet to the Point of Beginning. Area=48,077.68 square feet. Resolution 15-002 Releasing Drainage Easement—16927 East Euclid Page 2 of 2 C ITY L L@ PO AN EVA 0.EY.OK; Lame Department of Community & .000°.:., Economic Development Request to Release Drainage Easement at 16927 E. Euclid Avenue City Council Regular Meeting February 24, 2015 Chad Riggs, Development Engineer 1 CITYI-ALL@ POKANEVA[EY.QRC ` - 'T.,,. ` .. z , game Department of Community & Economic Development 16927 E.Euclid i -, (r-inT 1 i1 �, Euclid Am 1 '�'r ;— 441Tl.9ln; .151a1.930 _- ( SPOK VA.LL-4u �� - !• '11V-*- . '. re it , 1..,.. :., .. .,.,..„,c, _ , ,. . ..t.i .____ ____ , . ,_____ ! _ _ "�J EutUd Ar tl a all - L, Fr1'j eTonle312T P � J. a! • 159.9 0 194.93 1.69:9 Feat apra aumr kegaakaWw.1mman - 3! I10 r.rnappav Atte am Isla,refererceeiry 2 Department of Community & - N � . .a Economic Development ; Y ` x.r - . LUMBER PRODUCTS _wtoi 7.1"'a.., GRADING, DRAINAGE AND �. .L.:. -- ;±j' . 3v."'n.. UTILITY PLAN AIL a • Z I n 'W r •"°w.... -.,.rte=N M! (. S m o- / w'"�w'n y a,„, f '�' ii...,4�'p F"A"' �" T' '° � biii 3�(0E .M € ,.. ...._„� M I r . - II � _TtFES . 1 FUND �- I - ....,.--- r II filr_,,::: fR�ai�el 3 �»TZr]�1�f�1�Sil t',:� , �_ .F r -. ram � �. .sem _ gyp.``n'. .., r c.. 'T". i. 1 =-i ,r.n+....e .ai III "° tr ��.. ,_ IIIII III _ _ , z.-- : "_= - � I i III I "3 ,` ` 1 f ' III - -- -"- -- - _ DRAINAGE EASEMENTI 1 ...� a 1 IIID �„ �T.�.. 1 4 7r• - �.� Y.FSS 'C 1 i rr .. � - _ _ F r � s ---M+ _ r ..5-.. .--27.--...:. vs,m..m�x"a�•n .' "CALL BEFOREYOU 616 i .. ".w'::�3E'° .K+°" W4Ert. gym,.„,=,.....c.„,,, �"�wYu° Rrq 7-4888600 �P n °x.: :°' .wia � e` -__ jam. X - .fit. .-ux .-X ono w..4..,. S .e.... ar+ 71 3 C ITYI-ALL�+�5 POKAN EVA REY.OC aliane Department of Community & - "_ Economic Development 4 S- - __ LUMBER PRODUCTS . LPUISM ADDITION GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN / 7.2-17-• ....,“ rdw a� UMW-, I _ .—.�. - . r Ttzte, y..,. a,.µa ▪n. ,III n )r / s s a .. L,--,,,,,,,-2, ....oma.... i , �n a a ,y,,• F .sr. r�.r r` `I - AS I s I 4 / `r r i .,.-�.. X':."F• .•... .........44 ..a. I. I I • { 1 M� +l" f PRODUCTS UmU►OSro Lumber Products I „-;,-=.t."-"-• i . r, (h i I)r PP•foxs Addition- 1999 , i ' '�E;I"I Q. crarzx '• 044• k LI--_ „� _ 1 i r -if 1 e.."..�.'�i.P 1 Ik �Il E.,--r—.— FF_R015 n__ M1 - � x.rsie� a r9Tr4ir, �a �as90 sv-F. "'a”' d, p,..E. a �. .tE ar'a' 't,,i) V1 moo.. ._ taillk ---,I.:—'. -- 4 wean&RURr PIRA!larMI PX= .g hk ki�6-- Di image Easernenl. ,_M Li i r f �� T, 1 `�, zr-417=L �--rri r r r e':T asp t rs-. E r. r-:-. =per i = . . r --:10111.11_=_a--- r ..wi -i1.7.T.F= S .Z .i . . —� S = . � Z..'L...�.- .a. . w. •m.— o Aww. • •• I. ,. • ti.4,��s ....Z..741 ......w... .",=... .....e...,...-. ^�w.� __="^L• -r,.• luny 11�t aLoyal uun,w r••..o•. .•...� 4 DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of February 19,2015; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress;items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings March 3,2015,Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Feb 23] 1. Browns Volleyball Project—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 2. Proposed Amended 2015 TIP—Steve Worley (20 minutes) 3.Accomplishments Report 2014—Mike Jackson(tentative) (60 minutes) 4.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 5. Info Only: Congst.Mitigation/Air Quality(CMAQ)2018-2020 Call for Projects[*estimated meeting: 100 min] March 10,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, March 2] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed Amended 2015 TIP—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-004 Street Vacation Old Mission Ave—Karen Kendall(10 minutes) 4. Proposed Reimbursement Resolution 15-001 —Erik Lamb (10 minutes) 5. Proposed Drainage Easement Release Resolution 15-002—Chad Riggs (10 minutes) 6.Motion Consideration: Browns Volleyball Contract—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Comp Plan, Site Specific Amendments—Marty Palaniuk, Christina Janssen (20 minutes) 8.Admin Report: CMAQ Call for Projects—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 9.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 100 minutes] March 17,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 9] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) March 24,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 16] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance,Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Lori Barlow (20 minutes) 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance,Zoning Map Amendments—Lori Barlow (10 minutes) 4. Proposed Resolution Amending 2015 TIP—Steve Worley (15 minutes) 5.Motion Consideration: CMAQ Call for Projects—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Beekeeping—Micki Harnois (20 minutes) 7.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 8. Info Only: Department Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 90 minutes] March 31,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 23] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 7,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,March 30] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) April 14,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 6] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance, Comprehensive Plan Amendments—Lori Barlow (20 minutes) 3.First Reading Proposed Ordinance,Zoning Map Amendments—Lori Barlow (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance,Beekeeping—Micki Harnois (15 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] April 21,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 13] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 2/19/2015 11:23:42 AM Page 1 of 2 Friday,April 24, 2015: Special Meeting: Council of Governments, 9:30 a.m. to noon, Conference Facility located in Expo Complex, 404 N Havana Street. Hosted by Spokane County Board of County Commissioners April 28,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 20] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Ordinance,Beekeeping—Micki Harnois (10 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: (a)Proposed 2016-2021 TIP; (b)Dept Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] May 5,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,April 27] 1. Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year TIP—Steve Worley (25 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 12,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 4] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year Tip—Steve Worley (20 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 19,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 11] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) May 26,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 18] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2016-2021 Six Year TIP—Steve Worley (10 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: Dept Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] June 2,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,May 25] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) June 9,2015,Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,June 1] 1.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) June 16,2015,tentative Special Meeting: Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m.to 4:00 p.m. [due Mon,June 8] Spokane Valley Council Chambers No evening meeting June 16,2015 June 23,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,June 15] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 3. Info Only: Dept Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: minutes] *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Avista Electrical Franchise Setback Requirements Bus Shelters Sidewalks and Developments Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement Spokane Regional Transportation Mgmt Ctr Governance Manual Marijuana,Minor in Consumption Public Safety Quarterly Costs Draft Advance Agenda 2/19/2015 11:23:42 AM Page 2 of 2 Spokane Parks and Recreation Department Valley2426 N. Discovery Place Spokane Valley, WA 99216 509.688.0300 Fax: 509.688.0188 parksandrec@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: City Council Members; Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Michael D. Stone, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreation Date: February 13, 2015 Re: Browns Park Volleyball Courts Construction Project Browns Park has a rich history and is loved by a wide range of community members. The development of the Browns Park Master Plan last year produced an exciting opportunity for our City. Not only does the master plan call for the expansion and improvement of park for the use by neighbors and residents, it also identifies an opportunity to expand on the sand volleyball complex. As part of the initial implementation of the master plan for Browns Park, we will be constructing new sand volleyball courts this spring. We have also continued to seek additional funding for this project. With capital funding budgeted for the installation of volleyball courts this year, construction plans and specifications have been prepared and the project is currently out to bid. We are hopeful, depending upon funding, to construct five new sand volleyball courts. The more courts that can be constructed at one time, allow for an economy of scale and reduced overall construction costs. The plans have been developed to maximize efficiencies and reduce costs. We are also including a number of bid alternates to ensure flexibility in our choices. Our intention is to have a contractor in place by late March and have the project completed prior to the volleyball season that begins in mid-May. We are excited about the potential to begin to showcase the volleyball complex and to see the economic benefits for our City as a result. Staff will be providing an Administrative Report on March 3 and will be bringing a construction contract recommendation for City Council consideration on March 10. If you have any questions or need additional information please let me know. Thank you. 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: February 24, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ® information ❑ admin. Report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Draft Amended 2015 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council Adopted the 2015-2020 Six Year TIP on June 24, 2014, Resolution #14-006; Council approval for HSIP Grant Applications on July 8, 2014; Second Amended 2014 TIP on October 14, 2014, Resolution 14-010. BACKGROUND: Council adopted the 2015-2020 TIP based upon information staff had at that time relative to available funds and how these funds could be utilized for transportation projects. Since the adoption of the 2015-2020 TIP, staff submitted grant applications for the following projects that were selected for funding that will begin in 2015: • McDonald Rd Safety Improvement Project (PE), 16th to Mission (HSIP) • Reflectorized Signal Backplate Project (PE), 10 Intersections Citywide (HSIP) • Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp Project (PE), Mission Ave - Lily to Park (CDBG) The City received funds from the Spokane Transit Authority (STA) to upgrade pedestrian facilities at the Evergreen and Indiana intersection: • Evergreen/Indiana Transit Access Improvement Project Additional proposed changes identified in the Amended 2015 TIP include the following: Removed projects: • Bowdish Sidewalk - 8th to 12th • Fancher Bridge over BNSF RR Expansion Joint Repair • Park Road Sidewalk Project • Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation • Spokane Valley/Millwood Trail Added Projects: • Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF & Trent (RW Only) The City's has identified Fund 311 Pavement Preservation projects in the City's 2015 budget which add these projects: • Argonne, Sprague to Appleway • Montgomery, Dartmouth to University • Maxwell, Houk, & Sinto, Pines (SR-27) to Houk • Sullivan Rd Preservation Project w/WSDOT, Trent to Wellesley Carryover projects from 2014: • Mission Ave Improvement Project (PE/RW Only) • Sullivan / Euclid Concrete Intersection (PE Only) • Mansfield Ave Connection Project • University Rd/I-90 Overpass Study • Pines (SR-27)/Grace Intersection Safety Project • Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study • Appleway Trail Phase 2 Based on this information, it is recommended that the 2015 TIP be amended to reflect the deletion of the projects that did not receive funding, include those projects that were not completed in 2014 and have carried over to the 2015 construction season, and those projects added to the 2015 construction season. Since the City uses Real Estate Excise Tax (REET) monies as matching funds for state and federal grants, this amendment to the current-year TIP is necessary to meet the state law that requires REET funds to only be used on projects that have been identified in an adopted plan. Attached is a summary of the proposed changes. A public hearing on these changes to the 2015 TIP is currently scheduled for March 10, 2015. Adoption of the Amended 2015 TIP is currently scheduled for March 24, 2015. OPTIONS: Information only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The projects costs shown in the draft Amended 2015 TIP are preliminary and may be adjusted prior to adoption to reflect 2014 year-end adjustments. There are sufficient capital project funds to cover the local match for these projects. STAFF CONTACT: Steve Worley, Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Draft Amended 2015 TIP City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Adopted 2015 Transportation Improvement Program Primary City Total 2015 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 253,000 $ 630,000 2 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail(PE Only) SCC Valley Mall STP(E) $ - $ 248,000 3 0155 Sullivan West Bridge Sullivan @Spokane River BR $ 893,000 $ 8,440,000 4 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements(Bike/Ped.) Various locations HSIP $ - $ 31,000 5 0201 ITS Infill Project Various locations CMAQ $ 41,000 $ 301,000 6 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements(PE Only) Sprague @ Barker City $ 12,000 $ 12,000 7 0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project Sprague Long CDBG $ - $ 236,000 8 2015 Street Preservation Project Various locations City $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 9 0143 Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation Barker Trent(SR 290) Fed/State $ 308,000 $ 1,988,000 10 Bowdish Sidewalk-8th to 12th 12th Avenue 8th Avenue SRTS $ 6,000 $ 52,000 11 Fancher Bridge over BNSF RR Expansion Joint Repair Fancher @ BNSF RR FedBR $ 40,000 $ 201,000 12 Park Road Sidewalk Project Sinto Indiana SRTS $ 8,000 $ 61,000 13 Sullivan Corridor ITS(PE Only) 1-90 Trent(SR 290) CMAQ $ 14,000 $ 105,000 14 0188 Sullivan Rd Resurfacing Project(PE Only) Sprague Mission STP(U) $ 156,000 $ 1,156,000 All Projects $ 3,731,000 $15,461,000 Funded Projects $3,665,000 $ 15,147,000 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works DRAFT AMENDED 2015 Transportation Improvement Program Resolution 15-Oxx,(x-xx-2015) Primary City Total 2015 Proj.# Project From To Source Amount Project Costs 1 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Improvements 1-90 Trent CMAQ $ 548,000 $ 1,185,000 2 0123 Mission Ave Improvement Project(PE/RW Only) Flora Barker STP(U) $ 55,000 $ 407,000 3 0141 Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection(PE Only) Sullivan Euclid STP(U) $ 12,000 $ 87,500 4 0155 Sullivan West Bridge#4508 Sullivan @Spokane River BR $ 1,220,000 $ 7,200,000 5 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements(PE Only) Sprague @ Barker City $ 12,000 $ 12,000 6 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection Project Pines(SR 27) Houk St. TIB-UCP $ - $ 1,176,000 7 0159 University Rd/I-90 Overpass Study University 1-90 CMAQ $ 2,100 $ 13,400 8 0166 Pines(SR-27)/Grace Intersection Safety Project Pines(SR 27)@ Grace Ave HSIP $ 51,700 $ 664,000 9 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements(Bike/Ped.) Various locations HSIP $ 74,600 $ 470,000 10 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 1-90 Wellesley STP(U) $ 12,100 $ 74,800 11 0176 Appleway Trail Phase 2(CN) University Evergreen CMAQ $ 677,000 $ 677,000 12 0201 ITS Infill Project Various locations CMAQ $ 40,700 $ 327,500 13 2015 Street Preservation Projects Various locations City $ 1,295,700 $ 1,295,700 Argonne Sprague Appleway City Montgomery Dartmouth University City Maxwell,Houk,&Sinto Pines(SR-27) Houk City 14 0211 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project Sprague Mission STP(U) $ 152,300 $ 1,128,500 15 0216 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project(WSDOT) Trent(SR-290) Wellesley City $552,000 $552,000 16 Sullivan Corridor ITS(PE Only) 1-90 Trent(SR-290) CMAQ $ 14,300 $ 105,500 17 0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project Sprague Long CDBG $ - $ 236,000 18 McDonald Rd Safety Improvement Project(PE Only) 16th Mission HSIP $ 6,000 $ 60,000 19 Reflectorized Signal Backplate Project Various locations HSIP $ 800 $ 8,000 20 Evergreen/Indiana Transit Access Imp Project Evergreen Indiana STA $ - $ 85,000 21 Seth Woodard Elementary Sidewalk Imp Project Lily Park CDBG $ 17,000 $ 37,000 22 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF&Trent(RW Only) Mirabeau Pkwy N Cement Rd City $ 10,000 $ 10,000 All Projects $ 4,753,300 $ 15,811,900 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Funded Projects Added Projects 2014 Carry Over Projects \\svfs1\Public Folders\Public Works\Capital Projects\CIP-TIP Funding\2015-2020 TIP\Amended 2015-2020\Amended 2015 TIP(Final Draft 2-12-2015).xlsx 2/18/2015 City of Spokane Valley [rl}�N Sp�kan' +e ` �Ua�ley Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 02/13/2015 16:09 Page 1 of 11 Community Development SO lane ;Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Pre-Application Meetings Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community Development scheduled a total of 10 Pre-Application Meetings in January 2015. 15 10 5 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre-Application = Commercial Pre-App Meeting / i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Use Pre-Application Meeting 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 10 0 0 1 0 n 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 10 Printed 02/13/2015 16:09 Page 2 of 11 „ Community Development N anel+ '' Sp0k Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Online Applications Received Community Development received a total of 97 Online Applications in January 2015. 100 50 °1� 1 -51 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec MI Trade Permit Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Demolition Permit IIIIII Approach Permit Sign Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Approach Permit 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition Permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reroof Permit 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right of Way Permit 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Permit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trade Permit 59 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 97 00 �S^`TI3 0 0 0 0 it Annual Total To-Date: 97 Printed 02/13/2015 16:09 Page 3 of 11 Community Development ValleySiiiikane Monthly Report 4000 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Construction Applications Received Community Development received a total of 254 Construction Applications in January 2015. 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 1 Commercial-TI Residential-New = Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-New 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade *24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade *86 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits *97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 254 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 254 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 02/13/2015 16:08 Page 4 of 11 Community Development Valley'Siiiikane Monthly Report 4000 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Land Use Applications Received Community Development received a total of 54 Land Use Applications in January 2015. I -\ -411 60 40 20 .,..- 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment - Binding Site Plan PreliminaryState Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting h_`^ Act(SEPA) _ ;J Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 Annual Total To-Date: 54 Printed 02/13/2015 16:08 Page 5 of 11 Community Development Valley'Siiiikane Monthly Report 4000 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Construction Permits Issued Community Development issued a total of 213 Construction Permits in January 2015. l '1 300 200 -- 100 100 0 11111 . di. # Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial -New Commercial-TI Residential-New IM Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential- New 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 80 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 213 0 0 0 0 0 j "i� Annual Total To-Date: 213 Printed 02/13/2015 16:07 Page 6 of 11 Community Development Valley'Siiiikane Monthly Report 4000 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Land Use Applications Approved Community Development approved a total of 43 Land Use Applications in January 2015. 60 iill 40 20 ....- 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment - Binding Site Plan PreliminaryState Environmental Policy __ Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting h_`^ Act(SEPA) WI Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 43 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 01 0 Annual Total To-Date: 43 Printed 02/13/2015 16:07 Page 7 of 11 Community Development [lel , Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Development Inspections Performed Community Development performed a total of 796 Development Inspections in January 2015. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013 2014 — 2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2015 796 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 2014 601 633 996 1,281 1,321 1,295 1,412 1,223 1,301 1,476 973 1,024 2013 465 503 808 1,026 1,060 1,015 1,084 1,078 1,186 1,015 833 673— Printed 02/13/2015 16:06 Page 8 of 11 Community Development N Sp0kaflC Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 23 citizen requests in the month of January. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. r M 30 20 1 10 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non-Violation Environmental General Nuisance MI Property ` Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint,Non-Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nuisance 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Property 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 0 0 p.. ? 0 Annual Total To-Date: 23 Printed 02/13/2015 16:06 Page 9 of 11 Community Development Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Revenue Community Development Revenue totaled $74,775 in January 2015. 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 2014 Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2015 $74,775 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $74,775 Trend $79,763 $67,972 $133,730 $131,195 $224,961 $199,161 $138,904 $100,987 $134,164 $109,327 $91,979 $67,777 $1,479,920 2014 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046 2013 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 2012 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $1,552,558 2011 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 $1,083,255 2010 $87,229 $84,626 $109,029 $96,800 $305,185 $102,781 $87,805 $87,724 $107,002 $73,100 $72,948 $64,009 $1,278,238 Printed 02/13/2015 16:04 Page 10 of 11 Community Development Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 01/31/2015 Building Permit Valuation Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $2,973,435 in January 2015. I- 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 '' 5,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -9- 2015 2014 - Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2015 $2.93M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M I $2.93M Trend $7.58M $3.92M $6.13M $6.87M $23.25M $18.45M $11.28M $6.65M $10.76M $7.63M $4.10M $2.93M I $109.54M 2014 $3.17M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $11.99M $7.70M $3.59M $6.29M I $111.87M 2013 $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M I$173.95M 2012 $0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M I$110.22M 2011 $1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M $65.20M 2010 $7.06M $6.34M $6.82M $6.64M $32.55M $4.86M $5.36M $3.91M $5.71M $3.01M $1.93M $2.29M [ $86.48M Printed 02/13/2015 16:04 Page 11 of 11 Rick VanLeuven Ozzie Knnezovich Chief of Police SLeiiff Spokane Valley Police Department $p0 Accredited Since 2011 y��R� Services provided in partnership with N=co WA rh, 2003 f the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, r,. Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven,Chief of Police DATE: February 16,2015 RE: Monthly Report January 2015 January 2015: January 2014: CAD incidents: 4,918 CAD incidents: 4,480 Reports taken: 1,936 Reports taken: 1,741 Traffic stops: 1,099 Traffic stops: 1.185 Traffic reports: 283 Traffic reports: 338 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing January residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the January Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For example, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake area to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not possible using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes and should not be compared to prior graphs include:Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. Page 1 ADMINISTRATIVE: Chief VanLeuven attended quarterly in-service in mid-January. Chief VanLeuven joined Sheriff's Knezovich and others for the"I Have a Dream" Speech and Martin Luther King Rally, held in downtown Spokane in mid-January. Funding for Nationally Honored Drug Task Force in Jeopardy - The Spokane County HIDTA (High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas) Drug Task Force (DTF) will be nationally recognized for their "Outstanding Task Force Effort" during a prescription drug investigation in 2013 and 2014. This investigation led to the arrest of 57 individuals on state and federal drug and money laundering charges in addition to the disruption and dismantlement of several multi- state drug trafficking organizations (DTOs). The SRDTF has commitments for continued funding from Spokane Valley, City of Spokane and Washington State, but the funding from Spokane County is in question due to budgetary concerns. The Spokane County HIDTA DTF consists of members from the SRDTF and the Spokane DEA Task Force. (SRDTF include: Detectives and Officers from the Spokane County Sheriffs Office, the Spokane Police Department and the Washington State Patrol.) (Spokane DEA Task Force include: Special Agents and Task Force Officers from the DEA, Washington State Patrol (WSP), Homeland Security Investigations, U.S. Border Patrol, Bureau of Indian Affairs and the United States Attorney's Office.) The investigative and operational results for this particular Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) Operation shows the success of these multi jurisdictional prescription pill diversion efforts: 57 arrests, 31 firearms, 19 vehicles, and approximately 10,403 OxyContin pills. Also seized from DTO members were quantities of marijuana, crack cocaine, cocaine, hydrocodone, hashish,MDMA, and other pharmaceutical substances. The investigation began in 2011, when the DEA Spokane Resident Office (SRO) identified an extensive oxycodone trafficking network operating between Los Angeles and Spokane. In 2012, Spokane County HIDTA TF initiated Federal Title III phone intercepts on phones utilized by Eight Trey gang members. Eight Trey (83rd Street) Gangster Crips (ETGC) members routinely used human mules, UPS, FedEx, and USPS to get drugs to the Spokane area and transport drug proceeds back to Los Angeles. In January 2013, a 62-person, 37-count indictment was returned in the Eastern District of Washington (EDWA) - the largest indictment ever filed in the EDWA. In February 2013, 62 federal arrest warrants, 50 federal search warrants, and 19 LAPD state search warrants were served. This well-coordinated operation included over 500 federal, state, and local law enforcement officers. As a result, there were 45 arrests, 3,250 OxyContin pills seized, 8 seized vehicles, and 26 seized weapons. Later in 2013,three outstanding fugitives were arrested in Washington and California. All but five of the defendants have either been found guilty at trial or pled guilty to multiple drug or conspiracy charges. The disruption of the DTO ended ETGC's ability to transport and distribute Oxycontin pills from California to Washington. The disruption not only eliminated the leadership within the DTO, but also took out mid-level personnel, down-line distributors, and drug/money couriers. Street price of a single Oxycontin pill in the Spokane area prior to the arrests was $20 per pill. Street price of Page 2 a single pill in the Spokane area following the arrests rose to $35 to $50 per pill, indicating that this organization was a significant source of supply controlling the diverted OxyContin market in Eastern Washington. The LAPD station responsible for the area in South Los Angeles controlled by ETGC reported a 73% reduction in gang-related crimes in ETGC territory following the take- down of this organization. This is a major community and neighborhood impact, all as a result of exemplary multi-agency cooperation in investigating diverted prescription drugs, work which was coordinated by the Spokane HIDTA Task Force. Sheriff Knezovich stated, "The Spokane Regional Drug Task Force members did a great job working with the Spokane DEA Task Force, the U.S. Attorney's Office and several additional law enforcement partners. It is an honor for them to be recognized for their professionalism and hard work. These results show why we need to work together to protect our community and underline how important it is to continue funding this Task Force." In mid-January, Chief VanLeuven along with other law enforcement personnel in the community attended a one-day training, entitled"Investigating Sexual Assault: Beyond the Basics." The end of January brought the Quarterly Leadership Meeting, which was attended by Chief VanLeuven and all detectives, sergeants, and lieutenants from the Sheriff's Office. One item on the agenda was the upcoming reaccreditation of the Spokane Valley Police Department, and expectations for those involved in this process. In late January, Chief VanLeuven gathered with members of the K-9 Unit to recognize 9-year- old Dylan Lyons of Junky Munkey. Back in October 2014, Deputy Bob Bond and his K9 partner Jet had the opportunity to meet Dylan at his nostalgic candy display, Junky Munkey, located inside The Reardan Plowboy — Urban Homesteading. Dylan donates the funds raised from his candy sales to local _ — charities and community organizations and he graciously decided he wanted to help our K-9 Unit. In late January, Dylan met with our K-9 Unit and delivered a donation to ` 44 g them of $410. Dylan's donation will be ;H — - °i" used to purchase K-9 Trauma Kits. Great le, %d job Dylan and "Thank you" for your help! 1 1. You are a wonderful example of our , - generous community and we appreciate ! your hard work and support! SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): S.C.O.P.E. welcomed 17 new volunteers to the program in the month of January. S.C.O.P.E. Participated In: • S.C.O.P.E.Basic Training • Crime Stoppers Meeting • GoodGuides Mentoring WVHS • Goodwill GoodGuides Mentoring • Security Awareness Training Program • East Valley Community Coalition • GSSAC Coalition Meeting Meeting • Operation Family ID Page 3 January 2015 Volunteers Hours per Station Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 9 286.5 41.5 328.0 Edgecliff 30 534.0 32.0 566.0 Trentwood 5 152.5 58.0 210.5 University 17 369.5 95.5 465.0 TOTALS 61 1342.5 227.0 1569.5 Volunteer Value($21.62 per hour)$33,932.59 for January 2015 Spokane Valley Graffiti Report _ 2012 2013 2014 2014 Jan. 0 2 3 Feb. 0 7 16 March 2 13 11 April 14 9 30 May 16 4 4 June 15 9 13 July 41 7 12 Aug. 57 22 6 Sept. 26 4 12 Oct. 30 7 6 Nov. 19 7 2 Dec. 37 1 7 Total 257 92 97 , S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT)volunteers contributed 41 on-scene hours (including travel time) in January, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 9 hours were for incidents outside of Spokane Valley. There were no Special Events in Spokane Valley in January. Total January volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 496; year-to-date total is 496 hours. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in December totaled 25 and in January 13 with 6 vehicles in December and 7 in January, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Seven hulks were processed in December and 22 hulks processed in January. During the month of January, a total of 71 vehicles were processed; the total for 2015 to date is 71. Page 4 SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS TRAINING HOURS SCSO SVPD TOTAL January 0 18 48 66 YTD - TOTAL 0 18 48 66 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley #of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 YTD Total 0 0 0 0 0 Spokane County #of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of #of Non- Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 3 16.5 0 0 0 YTD Total 3 16.5 0 0 0 OPERATIONS: Pharmacy Robbery Suspect Identified - Spokane County Sheriff's Office Major Crime Detectives have identified a 26-year-old male as the suspect of three pharmacy robberies in Spokane Valley and Spokane County. The male suspect was arrested by the North Idaho Violent Crimes Task Force and the Coeur d'Alene Police Department in early January for the robbery of the Walgreens Pharmacy in Coeur d'Alene. Major Crimes Detectives have been working closely with the North Idaho Violent Crimes Task Force as they investigated several pharmacy robberies in Spokane and Kootenai counties over the last couple of months. Through their investigation, Major Crimes Detectives believe this male suspect committed robberies of the Walgreens Pharmacy located at 15510 E. Sprague Avenue in Spokane Valley and the Albertsons Pharmacy located at 13606 E. 32n1 Avenue in Spokane County on November 15, 2014, as well as, the ShopKo Pharmacy located at 13414 E. Sprague in Spokane Valley on December 7, 2014. Charges in Spokane County for these robberies are expected as this investigation continues. This is a great example of multiple law enforcement agencies working together to apprehend this potentially dangerous individual who is suspected of committing several pharmacy robberies in Washington, Idaho, Montana and North Dakota. Deputy Catches Burglars with the "Lamb" - A Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy contacted two suspicious males and arrested both of them for Residential Burglary and 3rd Degree Theft. On a Sunday morning in mid-January, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Jerad Kiehn noticed two Page 5 males walking on 14`h Avenue carrying large black garbage bags over their shoulders.Deputy Kiehn, who had taken several early morning burglaries and theft reports in the area, decided to contact the males. He pulled up behind the males as they walked east on 15th Avenue from University Road.Deputy Kiehn did not activate his lights or block their path as he pulled up behind them. The two males stopped and agreed to talk with Deputy Kiehn, who explained there had been several recent burglaries and thefts in the area. Both males seemed cordial and laughed when they were told why they were being contacted.Deputy Kiehn was told the bags contained food "Rochelle" gave them because she was moving. Both males started to open the bags, but were asked to wait until another deputy arrived for officer safety. The bags were checked and they were both full of food. One bag contained a large amount of frozen lamb chops, which seemed odd to the deputies, due to their value.A deputy contacted the residence where "Rochelle" lives and was told the two men had not been there and she did not give them any food.Knowing the story the two men provided wasn't true, Deputy Kiehn, assisted by other deputies on scene, began checking the snow in the area for footprints that matched those of the males. Deputies located footprints matching the shoes of the males and followed them to a residence located in the 10500 block of East 14th Avenue. They found the doors of the three buildings at the location had been forced open. During the investigation, deputies contacted the owner of the property. She confirmed the food, found in the possession of the two men, was actually hers and that the food had been inside her freezer located inside the residence.Both male suspects were transported to the Spokane County Jail where they were booked for Residential Burglary and 3rd Degree Theft. After the investigation, the food was returned to the owner. Citizen's Report Catches Theft Suspects - While investigating a possible vehicle prowling reported by an alert neighbor, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Sean Walter arrested two suspects for warrants, vehicle prowling and possession of a stolen vehicle. On a Tuesday in mid- January, at approximately 11:10 a.m., Deputy Walter responded to a reported vehicle prowling in progress in the area of 900 South Pines in Spokane Valley. The caller stated she observed two suspects taking the vehicle battery and other items out of her neighbor's vehicle. Once at the scene, the victim told Deputy Walter she and her boyfriend confronted the two suspects, a 38- year-old male and a 38-year-old female after her neighbor notified her of the theft. The suspects told the neighbor that they thought the vehicle was abandoned and they could take items out of it. Deputy Walter contacted the suspects who appeared to be under the influence of methamphetamine. He was told the two where homeless and living out of a Mazda Protégé parked next to the victim's vehicle.After checking the license plate of the Protégé, Deputy Walter learned it had been reported stolen in late December. Both suspects changed their stories several times during the contact and were unable to explain why the Protégé they were staying in was reported as stolen. A records check of the suspects revealed both had outstanding misdemeanor warrants for their arrest. The pair was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for 2nd Degree Vehicle Prowling, Possession of a Stolen Motor Vehicle, and their warrants. Mother Arrested After Leaving Two-Year-Old in Car - Spokane Valley Sheriff's deputies arrested a 22-year-old female suspect for DUI and Reckless Endangerment after she ran out of gas and walked home, leaving her two-year-old daughter unattended in the vehicle. In mid- January at approximately 8:40 p.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's deputies responded to a 911 call of Page 6 a missing two-year-old child. The father of the child stated the female arrived at their residence without their daughter. When asked where their daughter was, the female suspect replied, "You mean she's not here?" He then ran outside, but did not find her vehicle in the driveway.After confronting the mother, she told him she ran out of gas and left their daughter in the vehicle; however, she couldn't remember where the vehicle was located. He told the deputy he didn't even know the female had left the residence with their daughter until that time. Several deputies began checking multiple locations and routes of travel for the child and vehicle without success. Approximately 20 to 30 minutes later, deputies learned a family member had located the child inside the female's vehicle parked in area of the 16600 block of East 23`d Avenue. Deputies responded to the location and the child appeared unharmed. Due to the cold temperatures, deputies requested medical personnel respond for a medical evaluation to ensure the child was in good health. After conducting an investigation, Deputy Todd Miller arrested the female for DUI and Reckless Endangerment, and booked her into the Spokane County Jail. The child was released to her father who was cooperative during the investigation. This incident was referred to Child Protective Services for their review. SCAMS Continue - The Spokane County Sheriff's Office and Spokane Valley Police Department continue to receive reports from our citizens regarding aggressive phone SCAMS. The fraudulent stories change, but the motives are always the same: They want your money! Don't be a victim, always verify. Currently, we are receiving reports these swindlers are stating they are from the IRS, the Social Security Administration (SSA), Medicare, law enforcement or some other government agency. They are extremely aggressive and demand citizens purchase prepaid credit cards and immediately provide them with the personal identification number (PIN). Once someone does this, the money is gone. We would like to remind everyone, government agencies will not call you demanding immediate payment by prepaid credit card or any other method. We urge everyone to share this information with their family and friends to protect them from possibly becoming a victim of these SCAMS. People should always verify with any agency or business by calling them directly at their publicly published phone number, NOT the one given to them by the person calling. Don't trust the number shown on your caller ID, as it can be fraudulent. Never give your personal information out over the phone.Do NOT be intimidated to immediately make a payment, especially with a prepaid credit card, money order or wire transfer. If you receive a call you believe is a scam, you can file a complaint online with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) at http://www.ftc.gov, the IRS at www.irs.gov, the Internet Crime Complain Center (IC3) at www.ic3.gov or call Crime Check at 509-456-2233. Here are some links for more information regarding the IRS Scam, the "Grandparent Scam" and the SSA scam: IRS: http://www.irs.gov/uac/Tax-Scams-Consumer-Alerts "Grandparent Scam": http://www.fbi.Qov/news/stories/2012/april/erandparent 040212 SSA: http://oia.ssa.2ov/newsroom/news-releases/social-security-inspector-general-warns- public-about-phishing-scam-requesting Page 7 Hoping to start a new SCOPE station! - Do you have any friends or family members living near the 57`h and Palouse region of South Spokane? The Sheriffs Office wants to increase the public safety efforts in that region, so are working on starting a S.C.O.P.E. station. We've got a number of new S.C.O.P.E. volunteers on board, but not enough to start a new station with a solid foundation. On Tuesday, February 24th, we will be having our second official South Hill S.C.O.P.E. meeting and hope to have more interested citizens attend. Sheriff Ozzie Knezovich will be our guest speaker. If you know someone who might be interested in learning what it means to be a S.C.O.P.E. volunteer and how S.C.O.P.E. gives back to the community with its public safety programs, please share this information with them and encourage them to attend on February 24th from 7-8 pm at the Moran Prairie Library. If you have any questions, please feel free to call Simone Ramel-McKay, Neighborhood Watch Coordinator and SCOPE Project Assistant, at(509)477-3055, or Rick Scott,the Director of S.C.O.P.E., at(509)477-3376. ******************** Page 8 2015 JANUARY CRIME REPORT To date: Yearly totals: Jan-15 Jan-14 2015 2014 2,014 2,013 2,012 2011 2010 2009 BURGLARY 85 86 85 86 1167 1101 1062 1027 936 725 FORGERY 48 53 48 53 659 850 826 593 341 297 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 161 119 161 119 1645 1628 1770 1566 1183 1245 NON-CRIMINAL 20 11 20 11 151 106 108 160 917 892 PROPERTY OTHER 132 138 132 138 1449 1469 1236 1126 837 933 RECOVERED VEHICLES 28 43 28 43 464 541 446 416 365 187 STOLEN VEHICLES 30 61 30 61 573 602 586 566 496 298 THEFT 248 218 248 218 3096 3040 2636 2512 2365 2162 VEHICLE OTHER 26 18 26 18 279 268 287 195 3 5 VEHICLE PROWLING _ 134 95 134 95 1196 1206 1165 1491 1395 920 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 912 842 912 842 10,679 10,811 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 ASSAULT 100 92 100 92 1087 950 936 963 895 927 DOA/SUICIDE 27 19 27 19 222 225 256 213 188 210 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 52 28 52 28 485 538 600 714 1297 1226 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 3 2 2 3 1 3 KIDNAP 4 3 4 3_ 38 24 17 15 16 21 MENTAL 41 31 41 31 307 268 270 253 289 310 MP 13 9 13 9 138 156 154 125 128 115 PERSONS OTHER 313 247 313 247 3366 3124 3112 2484 1692 1621 ROBBERY 10 6 10 6 94 96 79 98 68 75 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 12 13 12 13 132 148 212 162 153 159 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 572 448 572 448 5231 5531 5638 4997 4727 4,667 ADULT RAPE 7 2 7 2 70 38 89 67 44 35 CHILD ABUSE 2 1 2 1 42 26 27 89 115 159 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 24 20 24 20 237 236 190 184 206 157 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 1 2 INDECENT LIBERTIES 2 1 2 1 29 20 27 17 8 10 RAPE/CHILD 1 1 1 1 13 13 13 23 28 35 RUNAWAY 32 33 32 33 406 397 530 510 490 440 SEX OTHER 3 5 3 5 69 46 38 56 215 211 STALKING 0 1 0 1 24 21 24 19 18 15 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 63 53 63 53 604 440 424 341 215 175 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 134 117 134 117 1494 1271 1370 1294 1387 1271 TOTAL ITF 35 36 35 36 336 316 430 521 542 671 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 283 338 283 338 3216 3525 3957 3569 3081 3,183 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,936 1,781 1,936 1,781 21,434 21,454 21,723 19,996 18,589 17,460 2015 January V. INCIDENTS BY CITIES : (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriffs Office) AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD INCIDENTS I 30 204 242 15 6 2 17 149 82 10 2,855 6 530 4,918 1 9,067 SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS 26 23 108 4 3 1 11 89 19 3 813 1 458 1,923 0 3,482 DRUG SELF INT(PATROL) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 5 TRAFFIC STOPS 4 7 24 1 0 1 4 25 9 0 315 1 231 1,099 0 1,721 TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST/CIT/IN) 0 2 5 0 0 1 0 5 3 0 110 0 95 497 0 718 TS (WARRANTS) 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 0 6 20 0 36 CALLS FOR SERVICE 4 181 134 11 3 1 6 60 63 7 2,042 5 72 2,995 1 5,585 ALARMS 0 0 5 0 0 0 1 4 2 0 79 0 1 93 0 185 ACCIDENTS 0 12 6 3 0 0 2 3 4 0 331 0 12 229 0 602 ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT) 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 15 0 20 DRUG CALLS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 1 61 0 69 DV 19 0 13 1 0 0 3 2 4 2 125 0 8 175 0 352 DUI 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 65 0 3 66 0 142 DUI (ARREST) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 26 0 27 PURSUITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY 3 15 18 0 0 0 0 12 8 0 297 0 30 579 0 962 VEHICLE RECOVERED 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 14 0 2 22 0 41 911 ABANDON LINE 0 87 11 5 1 1 1 5 2 1 181 1 6 270 0 572 SHOPLIFTING 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 47 0 53 ALL ARRESTS (ARREST/CIT/IN) 2 3 23 1 0 1 1 15 8 1 196 0 117 764 0 1,132 1 CRIME CHECK REPORTS 0 0 13 1 1 0 2 17 8 2 385 1 3 597 0 1,030 2/10/2015 2015 JANUARY CRIMES BY CITIES (Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV Total BURGLARY 6, 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 2 0 47 0 1 85 0 146 FORGERY 31 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 47 1 1 48 0 105 MAL MISCHIEF 3 0 4 0 0 0 4 0 1 1 94 0 4 161 0 272 NON-CRIMINAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 6 0 1 20 0 28 PROP OTHER 16 3 7 0 0 0 9 7 2 0 51 0 16 132 0 243 RCRVD VEH 4 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 14 0 4 28 0 57 STL VEH 1 0 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 16 0 3 30 0 56 THEFT 27 0 13 0 0 0 7 8 3 2 108 0 5 248 0 421 VEH OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 0 26 0 40 VEH PROWL 4 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 50 0 0 134 0 192 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 64 3 37 0 0 0 27 21 9 5 446 1 35 912 0 1,560 ASSAULT 7 0 5 1 0 0 1 10 2 0 39 0 8 100 0 173 DO A/SUICIDE 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 28 0 1 27 0 61 DV 19 0 7 0 0 0 3 1 1 1 44 0 0 52 0 128 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 6 MENTAL 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 18 0 1 41_ 0 66 MP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 13 0 21 PERS OTHER 18 1 12 0 1 1 12 12 7 0 186 0 36 313 0 599 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 10 0 14 TEL-HARASS 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 1 12 0 26 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 48 1 24 2 4 1 17 25 11 1 340 0 48 572 0 1,094 ADULT RAPE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 1 7 0 15 CHILD ABUSE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 4 CUST INTFER 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 24 0 35 SEX REGIS F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 3 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 3 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 4 RUNAWAY 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 29 0 1 32 0 70 SEX OTHER 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 3 0 13 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 SUSP PERSON 15 0 1 0 0 0 9 1 1_ 0 33 0 3 63 0 126 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 19 0 5 0 0 0 10 3 2 0 94 0 10 134 0 277 TOTAL ITF 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 6 35 0 52 TOTAL TRAFFIC 18 0 4 1 0 0 7 10 7 0 163 0 42 283 0 535 ;TOVA.L RFPORTS RECEIVED 150 4 71 3 4 1 61 60 29 6 1,051 1 141 1,936 0 3,518 2/3/2015 ��e!Ibe Clements S ��1I-Vis p I \ •rri.\d�µct 9 - ,�y��i E �ek�- ,.A1'09 "we I I ll9 e .a Crest+' 7' �ose h rl ed - U I✓@�� e / w 7 ie �' �In o- ate/ ,. l C [ Mandalay - ,n4' fruit Hill —(- r Granite • .i,S s,.‘._1.._,,, R , Wabash `••• d aii;,....', _, d Well-le - 6T rd� _• 8 _� � elMs1 � Hc_��■� entI-II v II - elan - r .. =MaIg= Gal �� `w ` E Rich 1 [9�.•■.°' ��`, Rk • • -ter -o c�� \� ''n �a.�ion�-. Lacross, a.. . �OaO�Lacl •arlan•. rJ > 4. ) < -ln■d tn'ar Pa A il ��: aE A n /� per° llwood o• ` r rmana-.5,,.. stei °��.�eccok NE ''t o.es \ ■oG�`]3 1■ WADY rpat, 4�nc_ '` y Mirabau C� Y e= wi > lid rick . ■i10 o '-IV 1•P� oW c S FlAs ryiesy i nem,,,,��`` tYC� / w, !I�a;;`fb� t z I al. / M. mei /4;�'0 �i•t��it,• U '1 .' / LIF rlislc = 1.1.- • m r �� Spo kan tI �!lal ley Monts. e _ ecL _GI �.�.�tt"'J fl _5 MansFlel 1 1 =MIJ/ in ' 1 ---J�--- / ,----- Knox M'su,I' ao.-CI liiirt'41 "1�AN& a jam'. m 8. I,-I n� ion !- ,,A, J...1122 11122 I .__-_________c!>----------Indiana —. 9. mrl ti e i=_ .- Ai" l r�� , - 0a4,0-.tin is fy� °��.`` ® � MO1T- UM tai • - 1 of Shar e /1 Nara. ` A _ S1 -B neImo u C1•`� fig fl \;`_ Des �1' fl:..ne berty Lake r��" in VV �._ 12� ' tt 3� - — 6° s to -U - —` 1 � - - �/Co__, snVista r ii -'.- r.-f1. W -nw5 f1 Aim �l� Broad y r L •ki � o�ry `WI`s ..Y o 1 �j . Vail , OfLi f1 li- e C I ml lU��o gi �y P ° / n 2 SPe.c H-7.� _ �� 1 -5 P�_ft4 '(I► �RI .e - • a lie = ilio '"=" .,41 ■ tin r fil iU} fl f1 WfU fl �Q;' Bi c oMN w,.=='7 CriE vi�' !i .n�na illi Tsc -MMUS —� �6 • h ;au ■ , l4 �Ci - E ° r £ ig TE� o /,gig MEM= 11� Mill/�" irth �= �.��` v helley � � o� u'�11� a�rrer�C r f► fj - i! (tt EQ f1 =C r=�� N re- mums■■ h o I �� 9�°o y ..4,,, i, 8 - LrL■■w ••ii��! �C= s m s s' - TT I Ith , ► . - ■�f��1 c 11-1.446).._!) �� fl ■ _ _.lys! / °°``tk. s X613" COM _ ria �5 • i�)` maw I _ 16th F �t��$ f! l t I. rig• 18th 2 �� i�. .:11•11 T _'' �� 1 1 Sia -r �� :may i�w!rMimene.5-,,i,R.� i. �1 ' ' SIO \ - Milkill. —e -d a:� � .�! �\� P A a-ti� Isnd \ o -A -�'7ac _, ,11 y • a an (�otwew :IEWI. - -r-j` p,•,.i 1_,./i -C '4�� 1' .! t'1""'-'6'tlf� ‘,---� _E I 4•I'' � i a i V' 25th °\ 1 I\ Illi/, l o �. I�� Co - �� y'�41. /-•-?'21 e V r�e� t s _ r - Traffic �� ' O , �.�n i E Collisions U U E Norm .� 3' o - r 36th — �u� f►6 • ! ';Bh r r . 2 �� 3 th c. \ �� o\� te[ �" =u•,� L Belle Terre i 0 3 E kor 4✓a�� (:oot _ r Ball � J'fill f°" v\ 42ndcfy-4315 I l !. •44dt ' _. .. I 45ch s Low z —Ai . 6, I �� (---,s•%.,-,.- !../y ch "1''• ii, • g •• :h 2-7 'sSlatµ- t y:.a.re-, Co„ ,, 2I s..,u�. _ `}ta -r._Agnric `-'fifi /rP�.l,� / _ Medium Low 5,� = ig* `° \tp�'Q x r rret�' 50th �a'.. GPo g Ai-cP Tic^R o — Medium 555, 54 - 4.6`.` ",_ '.'- I'' Slo 1 C' sr -1 € °oe A\ he r r 9IIIM T N 5 C' ,-- "--,-,N• ai _1 ( I' l Ste .I San1P'I-M!v"f_ Pus 5 ,ce - High �J a^,d° as 0 I 0.5 1 Miles I 2014 December Traffic Collision H ots p ots Map Produced: �1ryJ t 05 Feb 2015 ke Clement c / I) ' ti°./ CentrJJal'5��1 ( i lQ' c 1.—__. SmonL. ,�,+ Fruit HIII y y �1 •,� { Granite ,° Sha° � wS& Wabash fie,, .z 15 . een`- •; •k'd '��_ • e• R K !y 930�� T c T/ 7 °3 € 3 3ill _P O __ j �J(, ' • T ub /F`i { Fraser , 8 - m ��--' .Yf�l ky AI ' �-Y • 1 4 r -_ I o le c sir LLL T B' d et•n `- }-Welle ley 1 ---- saw ._&" m .S.t.: •w 1- t ( Rich K_ ` r —_ / it L_'�i- $ 4 --11141 E_� ....1 _I — ) II �I 11—i TA __g -`1�w lacrossq al polcane -;'C r tan •arlano 5 .°°o -- < Ind UrelltrkA 'E' 8 Lac l -1-- .o�N _� / Kienan nd.tri r kk R £ $ 1 L: IF $0.--,P.141 .--..- „_ / i - \\. MIME Y %3 ''� ! i■ y 7nevb¢ �_ It c r. ----' ua.•■. Oa • yn9,to - �—� k . ' w b° 11140:1! ` i � �'(t <-� Fr�de7ldcMira u In• lal•.r D kon y E lid_ne �idt 0`S is�.e o I-fi' 1�. U- \ ° •'trial Park E y —__ iv ■arv'� 5P &4L `r .r1-11- I---NM e y •� 4 r F,rvigw��?�� 9 � 'a '� ra Y - IAS. r. �C i �./ •' =mE'r <� lei ® �, • 'Spokane alley,"pi Erna p •r'b�' _ r_�A •� oma---`-S.----1,-1-_--...... maVana \ Fi,�alKno .' `.� .i'r_`---R--lye.. El- le Lake rasion P----''��' Au. sta -- ' �C I i-[M's ion \_:.�` \ �../ Old r 1__u-B . go \7:1 '_ `� s �l = R. �` • 1--- 7 + NI �_� \ Mis-- E Into- i • E •1111'• nu _ onset ar• MT - 1 — d B°6 --L' -E �■r■ $ "�c. ( s U7. �' _Oil u t_ r ,_,DE _ff et .- �� id.8 . ti v°U •° u.._- 1 -}-1 7.. ICY._. ^E-0>' E all:n. ._ ,�Catald< �- � l IY , n V to OW= �L Mir o - sit— u 7— £��—:1>7 .. •4- P � Broa ai U _ m I1 c _ 7dki fi.l --� l -Intl tica ills 'Zi -- I•. E L 1. Valle a =■ - T �� aI -�Gtv Xon-°Q0 Q 1. Ferry =' �! SPe r N rl , , t>• 3 I_�7E W ■■Rive_� , t.---1::: •'ti p �Fn ' • --litr - ---5 p.,-71g1 --2_____E 7,...._qt__BI I-i X 0 Tii it caw NEW= lc. ' IP' II - d ip, , She11eY Nall 6th ' Yi u_`�- +se .ib ; C' '' •_=1YY1�1�' C= ��■ I _ 9____ ��i ( t Ea�'o. ' . . rI o• do $ _ IIOOn � -16th =.� Sr c / IB I , ,q;s -- ■!� _ -• 18th �1�'vl' :4 ■'' Cb =arc ay / t,e' a> O: ---'^\, :r. i^ \• • / •a rr 1st 20t n cc J'' yi fit ` _ `l \ \‘ VIE= u■ ✓ \\ ,a r -N L_' _ M �i d b a [ �1■ 3_1 T(C Il r"--1,q // \ •A S M.t 26th"•'r\i■m� (^r '%, ` TlY o -_U t F 25th.- I/,(\I / i ■� 2. tj Ig- �,� Elm 3 -6 ..E„ S L' i E ' � —~— I O �s\\ ---\ , �• k�� O m „.2.6,... 36th k_ 9 , P Z 3 h' n A r rt, u --� 37th RaP4,7,/ ° Om r9\ �€ , Z \ .�c Belle Terre _ . - 4 5 of l 1�� ,, l k 41s n J- ; Commercial 41} -�^ I .•4- -.o. /�,°/ra �', © $-C e/ 42nd �° Ball r aid It 3aat63d�•q� 'yfi• a3�a ase— Burglaries ht �Lan - iz � . 46 s -� ;;; ;imi $III �._ GA nk G�� S` Ees / Y� ° 5 lI D / _-<,yh/ -N/ rel 3 No °6 ��,,�/ R�� ..1-04 CC`� ,( .` � �Psr I'^. �x�SC p'eb a ) �r e -�YYT ril`dP' U°+. — Medium 8tH 57th6 p 114 ° F>k `-�� /�U°rkery/-- �l �.o.$�\ - Sana" MOka9'4°/ P'gc•5°,a I C,t s 1 - v oo _ High ��N I .' U /4-aBC V Jl<l" I\ ..rte I \.l� M� '� 3 F2 0 as 1Miles 2015 January Commercial Burglary Hotspots 05 eb2015 : `: WIN. Clemen _ Visq1 /^" V`� 'I�� /o Trait �--• Ipseph S aIGR°- „ / Le' i I - • For e = , I !MR_. Mandalay '� /i ,�,F• Fruit Hill "' •'' ° �I- / �Granicc �-_ CCk`8 ?i".•\ tkb /Y �Orei t . , ser ' 8 — Ca Lr-mi ,-y�I'W'fe'llesl y_ ..., _11 `J-,. , _ �._.. N gi e n ,--Lon:. .w f Rich , E _ _ � 1 tch pokane _ 'k\t� \ y -W°hon ��v i 'v5I L .R•ckwel- m Latross• I e $ 4r,� Y! arland _ n Q --- Indu trif-Pa kA E -. 111 .mj"� ° Kie an du trial Pa kms= = di ar `` I,i,.f 80 a % �. a".. \ I du M Pa 2r.y ` c x 3$ _1, wood =J!!2jJ !. Da �F r- •-, e c e -------4 45 VS` -2deTlc ° fid,•crParkE 'bISOD _ �� 3 1 17° P �- `� k'o F rvi:w 9__ 6 • eke —E�� c 8uc{32S •/ a �' �__-1- bra ` MTett - �92 'C4'^ '�• II�� °� / ^ � .,�me �i ._� .I -' 1r Spokane alley _ Mc e ° �-� Lj /.,------ ' �•1 i CN1 anstie � J /P r m 'o. f 11 _ Ileo 6 Inalana\ V' e, 11' • :"‘..L1114' Lake Z pg •On- -a • . ■ I • - .._.Nota_=- \ gO5 pit JOld J .^•...u 1 o• . ?�- Mission s �'" to - f el ° Missi. =Miss•n D sa II, II i! 7u ..� sT1�' ilihv n �.1� '3 �/ rl�r bJJI # T ��f MelJ slaE. sj . c 1- i .-�.. 'yY Vista • z3ILL -oE'Oo - I �� i„�. • ■iwi x�� -i ' igl ' E �■ I Sm :o ' ovule �, 6-M.In 1 �A= s r Ha.T,ismlf■�I IiI! '•on ®� `•erg le' o �� / . rani= IP= 1"j • ."ti= C zme _A .1 a ., _ lr M9 - la .1. si !! „!, !i/ �l 2nd-6 .I.v_iew FAME-' r�[ !-�.., '1mei� tll I !. �11i yl. " _....,--,m, °= WV ,`1 "0 ip , _ c se ��1 t ■r �r n 5 —t �I■ _ `+ice �„ I! o p ma 44' �� a I h r ■��a I ' L ■� ��v wan 6 �.� - - _ s', lJ ��'�1t� T`dl f o CJI q m `c E'� • tt 13 a o .('lam ` a �r■I�Is�� I <, 14�h N c� -I�' c7 x h._I.�r ah. 2* f - it �� ■ ��c YItl1-:_,.�, 16th dr :rcay /j�\< • l - „5■ 111 ill �� ---\, A 18th - 1� t ■1R - I c.7 ( 1nt ■ 3 .sr r o Q .� (J •.�� .* .°� star ( 21st l f0< 8th...2 c 1111111k. el _ ` \ 1 cal--�/ 1 _,• x T 44.11 --I{/•s ?-7 mo _ 2�21 32sBd Igo LL s-bo y" �_ ` Q /�• 1_3„„-• c •--IA_ -.Ma - e n■ 2 th cs 4--- F . ,a • owview l E. 25th o\ % V _ 0 2i! - Ce3w _ 2. ��.. Fi1 'n;'� t, -'241_2, a -Nix > ,2.... a� �� •t EN I+ k Lam.—'a -L ,._ _ D , L ) xa ,r i --- n3\ 35 M* -e 5 ■1a36-jh - - O Wm 1 rnom-_ to M H AI• a / 8th 3 S35th-6tN_ 1 36t 4 _- --< ,�.i.J N � - Residential St 37th a 'c`Rgn � - i elle Terce V« h _ iiI. '7a:\-lam • 1m `t�,� -2",,,M, IN of S� oA`(( n 4B_ o Burglaries 7 f x-��11 s• f / l� G\�.,�`i�� _. \ o 1,4-% �FZnd 1 ( J �1 �i� Si -1 /ara `o n 1 Ball ( 1 r4 43rd- m I ``.-- PITO$ / rG \•\ a = I7� • i �)'. y I 3 U _ __ i ;44,ii /32 Ifhor.:• `I•\ (r 45th 8�tia/ 3 h LJ�'i.- t-'�o : a ~- _ ,.46 i _ ( 1 1.- iTJ_',.- G 3 // 0 3 -iach_?(,• �« *sl •s- J Co„ 11 , , .. CIC47c-8�-h� - )1�_ Annic Z£ y%tµ 7-- aRC ,% �, ?e r,o, ( � �° LOW 9tJt o nes 4?;2'2: �� 'rcec -�Socli aj calci 13 0 �oa �R._� �, G,Sy1 ql To,`� �9ot`ttg� 0a P4 a a2 -,) 1 n? rP�rrs V EN Medium 5 cht 54� 1 j`.y� ¢ r e C7 L-1 o00,:.4-0-1,- ,,,,,,o I c 1 57th JI I{9/ E\t ,`� c, !Y/ I'� -"�-tsand' 4 h d (` `� 1 $v -1-1fl� d /Q161'e Vex ' ale`e `moi 4°J�� I °`�¢ .%ce High 0 I 0.5 I Miles 2015 January Residential Burglary Hotspots Map Produced: �s`J 1 05 Feb 2015 UN N Ocmen �� I I \/) IR1'^ Z._�° Qy Tram pi- D� FJ--.....-"-'7_:,.-,--- -, _ // .c'I Iml7 t a Cres° a'.< e< _.�-�_.i'� zhsepti Com} z _7' M°°-tia-; l_. ac( i_--—-- I , / �'ti o Mandalay o1..i 4 j- owa •-� �e,�Fr Fruit Hill "' •• s 1Q,` �� ( �Grani[e �_ LL 11, ` Sh RUb`c� 9�rM Wabash� 8 °� S'� �il' c • % •�� 'Cr `err '<." a y,# .` Fraser 11/ — fO° IIllesl ._ I" 0 % tL Y fi O` v CA-) - �- o Aida. oci n--L ---41:47 w u Rich I C�� .� .y p kan e _-��y � C-�J �c�l�i ��/ o�JI At—�_Q►R ck""-_"elt or M Laeross. . § rJJ Indo trTTPa�k.A!� c o`W -� > ooy- n ° ..-_.._ --- Klenan du. Payr; 5 ar, t� till JI a • VP?Iria <e i� -44.--_-___ 4.,nea� �• \,1 I du Q ••Y x"a \tA\ c r p E \ C-- In.us lal'r•D �' ho~_n, '- €r E fid Ei=M�ne .ta. - �� - f .I ` Mirab�aU i -- or iR1.-trial Park E - -- -- ..O"._ P1 ! OM!_. 1_1W! •d--tr FYI r �IIIr1,'v13:1 ck ��ti4 +• C7 OP _— , — — t_ _ \— i_ \1 k'n' F:.rvi.w �.. _B \ � i.. — e�Gra Buc m 74 0//-,,, ? 43!-- �+ . . .c \1\ Marieu I '_ 6 P. k o<Ifili � .� eimE:1: SS _.C.�_ �. `Er Ina `; `/C.l c/1 <� / - -_ .. .—_ _ '"1— -'.,_.. '' Mansfield�� Spo a.ne alley y� }ti. / ro i - K o •! = s _ Knox- 1R �r• • rtk • A ,►_. T n-3 90_ I i�.Mls Ionil _`Nora�.�n_.�..82- �1�,_ \.� `F\\Flt J � �--- g �_p,�� ..3� 1�;��'—■ LakC ^ g, Jl ^�I'rrI{ I I Int. r y i I e E^ _>,\ 1 �\ c nto_ M�'is r€' L.•• o°sn .rI L:�I - -� —.. _E+ Boone -- `—. - _.:-: -------i''' 7`L--.......----....„1-_-_ eel 0 --i .° rem i'r - I ataid•.°a. of • -% kr - -- - _. in —,.. l-_�---�'..'� Gold• ;- � }MU orr� �_ ~ oii i _ � P .Ev;soI -- r � 1b - _ .P ire. 4e �g° Il b iAkP Valley_riri—rli _ I�it or —�d Mi 1 mi �C,Ae .•' a / If ific A 'F.141112 A" a 1 rr., BI - 7.....„11 1 11 3 view •t.' to i.3s• 1 .� �C m� _ — 4�h 5 m _ ... ` --/ ' 1 . —5 • ■�,�i VS •i Ferre i rff• Co-13111,70 .t VII' C oh 19---MI - -7th IR* Shelley U,11 I -E$ m u—S tionr —V=HMI"i�.:J .�= �� Ilif _i1 _O iiC� ~ _� ht 1, mum 45 II `' 16chBpi 111 I [��•• 40�p w �II—f :art ay <� ••••nth 1•• a e.i- 7 1 I' •r 3 \ �7......16„ r hath ;51 , t� rb. / i. • ill s..� i�r 1 < e�l1,,-8 vp'' ■ . 4-i 4 • 1,01,„<y` P 1,, . t.�star 31st is �% _ �,l . 3,._,. :::.,.F,cA � , 1 ��-j" 1-,. � '.,� yA a !• _ — _ . 4,-, ti 2 th'L. n 1 _,. ovrview ,.•-Z 11.3 �l •„,. ,• 26th`- iii 2��.- ( O ,�- __;y}� 0 1 25th mof ��/ ` 28th , Ce 'T��—{� 2>,\ - • Fun �'6 .„...., _ liJ l�f i i/ D a,1r• � [� :a `F�.w c .` ro l _' a�, _ a .5 5._, l °I r. tg. -- ------ -moi iarar a\ -�m� \m 04 r 5 -I N 366th E e 3Sra O R n . ,[log `C �o MI— HJ :eIIc i \ gL'ig.i�Silt1. 37th @ d l\ . eL 4' . 2. 4`st� S�,i''''') Terre 1 LAA .7--. E-�s•a �" � ^b r •o im adrol� �'� ILy1 o ke on��-{, � 42nd `G' - Ball Y �• ' 1` f�''� 4 a y�( ``i �°. ' '1 ( .1\\ " �`'J 1m _°r ^2 Stolen T 4r _01.,:Y- 45- Prai_o 3° -'---� _ 144t 6 = L, �fhor �1� �\ �.�[ H^ a rII -Ki -.,J / Vehicles M .:s_ • F _ •,'47 184h�'," J 1 gtsnnic 2 LL j�< �,(�^ '4 ,-51h_ '� /- r °f / t �� , fez •G •`C!" • e _, Lownilli ._ 03 ; I nes G �/ i , rret�°-)SptK 1 3�1�0 °J P, ,8 •W Medium !e?o 1!.. a� p. a x.:4,-,7 °', cumr�l l� •4ioG� 57t54�6i � '" R <: or ery{/C7 �` \,--� .�/ ��Pc Moh;,,°oke` ,, 8:1 'a. V° �d8e �.. 1 .°te�e Sana \4 �\,4 I jcc $-.g.° _ High 0 0.5 I Miles 2014 November & December Stolen Vehicle Hotspots Map Produced: aie I I i 05 Feb 2015 - 0. ulera rmo Clement' i- Visy11 \ \`\am :17s,u --�_�f b �Tra/�" a, EE T 3''ck�l�� /^�/ - � +' 3c` sa Cre�'1'� �� ,_� i s 5 l{(�l / Red-Or1r g.- eo 77 �� rSL` � Kde 0a( LPu?`� c /1octl -..„ �J�� Mandalay (�}("< /• owar � F'� Fruit HiII -L I Granite . o PIC e T -9fr Y S„ 4 _../..4.,,es Wa h c// 9 + �`-5 9/y Plc --Z �1 a __ 'hent I E S. s Ru64o m IY �F aser_y-_ 8 ° 1---{1 m ;Ileal :� LJ. 00• <rl/ L ■� sent Brad-__ } — 0 -- N- OI N s !Ole `1 i- g •ch \\� �''•};p":.r.w -{- r i: Rich 1 = m-f .7��,E y�_ m po lcan e 1�, _ �{ o - Ali_i°R•ckwell or ��-4=" lac = r6 ross- N;� -' ly-• ariand _E ) / n .. .--_,---� Indu■t1rIT�TPatk■A!I E s `1 ann:. !I� (• N o . Kle an nd f l Paas: >`• al �y�\ is*, f / ----�, I du ME Pa T n 3$ t.r. . �'�L7:■■ - Millwood /�?--- �nerr Y M '" x, a' '�3 ■� pa EmPce _,- _f1�7� C `� In.us cum ". _kg; __o., s �,-� �■ ■■ !■ I > E lid ��ick v'`` 'e 1':s ' •E 1i. i ri ' � '(_r%-rrFde6icic MtrabWu -%O ny�.trial Park •S -,__- ern l� fig' p��qt-..7 �i]rIII i/- 1, rI�-{I •'r •! yl � e j I ----- - - pi �. h"n rvi:w J 9 6 1 Cd'1p :uk. •_FI- --1 eo.r,y¢'�' Buc -‘ .if ,� f` -�- c.?° �.. �('Q 1 M ett. - /-9. \ct�' a e QI _ ll/NW_ 1•• - _ ,Mont o n•_ ._ fI1 4 1 es \ T 0 Spokan alley �c�°tom s eld 'eLE,t`; 'al` ! 1`Tn-L.'-1 1 1 ".�(11 1 0%, - - - . mc-ve� 1 rrO S�ro�'OP I` / • �.i� 'a-•T T190 L� _ 11 l- ------ ]---'Indla^n1 'rKno # _ -ft•liis• Lake c ps- 1 _Bah• !� :-�,- ..�._`f P¢ OPd uIt itl 't d !t,, fssfon .� Au ata _ tom- ]-\- I s Ion ?T°c-��- - B •ne aCwelt- • )'• ! 1 Int• k••rY�_..�' �- `1 ,� ono �Il MI �- ��-� �L� Ml713- - �8��._ .we E Lopill m I _ , -T' a ``� Des l7 I 'PIT of - her. Ii -l..f i .e i EC - -• L�� - Id.SP 111 '.l1d: € `M'E fl1 E° �! Broadw y - L,4.,., ` •�■ •' � ll m�-SII i. mit �,RR "..� I ilk _All ` � Y4 + r? i; w S ,, • la .. ific ■�! ,L.y ■ �li� Ad _, ,r_i_ i�• -'tit .ti til Bo- r�' SIJ • i`--a= i�iarZ' �� .. •e4r1��■■e�:�� • I(II� `- )• 1 -6l'�►'" `y' i fll�sa �1 t, li. ��!i",111 a•.71: II 1�.'• t ��rd2 1 1 ..�!! " O) y. a � , `til 'E! 1 -7 111 � /.N �' a6 6---5 EMI=`? '-8ds ' 'iee iv_t.i:. �wr61 it l 4I► R — _ ■■ to 1 ■ i►:. .. •!j •! E■s! • ` � i wir l � .eTtlll --I_tA1, g. 4 a Ilth_1 4``1 lith ry� s`� 1�4 h o'° = i JJ' �� isa■Is ,. ��r 7i �i� �' *► 1 61r EE��■ 6- _ 1�51th' 16th• t M-')---to' :arc ay �`�l ,11$ .g'.. ../ _iii - \ --% lit 4�, - shalt!" 18th -,��`�Jle e4'rc • C°. ,im t � y� Vi' �� F_ �■ 8� `I $.{\s� 1� an-ca E a .�' 1.-' ',4 / AP ri a st 20t a xu ' v -- I� ! ---�cr\ `_t''-• 1-4,,a8 -Td'=s i7 '� P R .° 3�d !ea bo ( i `Q • _ c Ma�CY-G'�n�-S. — L_..� °o Inii._ \/ 1 � �-,. \J V C '.."_,_770...7 26ih'� ��.s R .+11.1---2 1316 ( O/�a ,� ��J�fY wview rik1 w 25th'o f ( % �' ) = 48th ' ,J>�� '^t■sy =g i,• \ - - n - s t j i Li t"-��"- 1---1------ I 0 a,, AP, 3, Hula <';� C g,I 36 h 9 ^T t••' - t-__ ( 36t 37th 1--n.5 IN .ec Jh 01o --,,�. cI ��'\ 'ICimma \� 411 s�7 0l I. —l-10 �' Belle__Terre Vehicle 7 E J" '11 )/? �I'C` . S� -4t�d ` .5 Prowling ' �7� i d9 b �,dra �6-,: �•\ 3 `o % --et, Barr J el Th. { r '� 43r. J(/� `� I t. . y� r wry uP- ill ,t41/T `~ 4 Mt ... 45th Bella 46th- v n «1 :s F •i3 't.•.u €47t�Tc(j-8 1; —\I .c = ylt 8 U M.42 o C nes C ��l\�� NIB 'x , rret� M, / �e�'Y_O\`1PO II¢of f-�n ,rt-ae i s "n 111011 LOW i•_I G'hei y c 17 p. a S K'I I4' ,_._4 ..ece� -\ lg a _ Medium ei Bo�\\rt, 54 t,� �f °`� orkef'Y O �."-'� ---9�M/dWp, - '`-a )(' r g .BtM 57th 6t. )' 0, •,--, \- -\_/--\/,',' U/� a.St Sand"� \'�° xso I c y o- High r ((( 68 V/meq, erce V°3, ai,z s 0 1 0.5 I Miles I 20 15 January Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Map Produced: 1 05 Feb 2015 *3 Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley 1600 1400 • AIAL lk • 1200 � __ww---' r A 1000 A j' , A i t -•}-2012 800 12013 --a-2014 -0-2015 600 400 200 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls 4500 4000 ♦ 3500 41111111N11 .%1111\14' ,rimarA 3000 0 ♦mm_A ♦ a ♦ 'N'4110,1,44 2500 • r' -r-2012 -N-2013 X2014 2000 -0-2015 1500 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS 140 120 ♦ ♦ 100 ♦ 1,44444Ar • 1r80 � • v -.)-2012 -11-2013 ♦ :-2014 60 -0-2015 40 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Person Crimes 400 350 300 0 • 250 ~• — + —��•�� -o-2012 • 200 t 2013 ��2014 - 2015 150 100 50 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Property Crimes 900 800 • A 41&. 700 • 500 �. -��-2012 -2013 400 2014 -0-2015 300 200 100 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents 2500 2000 • • 4114000.. Afrih'I A Aft. NW" • 1500 1 2013 X2014 -0-2015 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Sex Crimes 50 45 Atip A 40 • • AAgggarA 35 it& pw: A 30 ♦ -. 2012 25 • . - 2013 111 . 4 X2014 -0-2015 20 15 - 10 5 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC c ,.�,F PARKS AND RECREATION Spokane Y FOURTH QUARTER REPORT ' 41• Valley. OCTOBER—DECEMBER 2014 ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS: ,.R. • Fall arrived and the park facility reservation season ended - • October 15, with over 400 reservations made for various facilities. The park restrooms have been winterized and are 1‘..7 closed closed for the season. Mirabeau Springs is turned off until spring, and the bear at Discovery Playground is in hibernation. • CenterPlace roof leaks were evaluated and a plan for repair was put into place. • Contracts in the fourth quarter included: o Professional Services for the Browns Park Volleyball Courts—Phase 1A Project, including construction documents and bidding and construction administration for adding additional volleyball courts. o Construction Agreement to replace the old drive rail on both gates at the Police Precinct with a new style to prevent the wheels from slipping on the drive rail. o Professional Services to complete the Old Mission Trailhead Project providing preliminary design, public input meetings, and construction documents. o The Precinct Exterior Painting Project contract was bid for work in the spring. • The Eagle Scout project of constructing a basketball court at Browns Park started, but the first freeze hindered the pouring of the concrete. This project will be finished in the spring. • We had another Eagle Scout project that was completed at the Western Dance Hall. Lighting was installed to illuminate the front steps leading into the building. It is very much appreciated, as you can imagine how difficult it is for the women to see their feet under those petticoat square dance dresses to begin with. • As part of the joint Centennial Trail maintenance agreement, the coordinating council is developing a six-year capital program. • Three new park signs were designed and constructed. They will be installed in the spring. ` • • Staff was unable to come to terms for a renewal contract , z with our CenterPlace caterer, Red Rock Catering. Staff = _ '.?t" •? will be working on a replacement to ensure a smooth - `� transition for our customers. �- ' g. , fi • The Police Precinct BAC wall and door remodel project b �4 '' was completed. . .� F jA, '. �., t,, � .F.ani 1 � � :-; CENTERPLACE: • CenterPlace staff took 292 reservations during the F 4th quarter of 2014. There were a total of 844 1 •,- events booked in 2014 and 372 events booked for _t,,. 2015. 'nj _g Excellence in _ '' ' : natal&Neonatal Care S. • We experienced a significant increase in breakfast CO" J. ,. - - 4 and lunch meetings moving to our facility because — of food service and proximity of our venue. ,,, '"�. r'` • This year, we had more than double the Christmas parties in I'. December than previous years. • CenterPlace staff submitted a Lodging Tax Fund application to w partner with Visit Spokane. The proposed project would be to meet with meeting planners at Visit Spokane booths at various trade shows and conferences in order to bring regional _ conferences to CenterPlace and other Spokane Valley facilities. \- 111 • We had an exhibit booth at the Greater Spokane Incorporated 'I,f f¥, . i •„1 (GSI) Business-to-Business Trade Show which was held at the 41las. '4' ` Sim _ I Northern Quest Casino. This trade show is targeted towards the r , . ° �' . business community, and always has an excellent attendance with 4 I,- r I more than 600 attendees and 75 exhibitors coming together to ,, , connect and showcase their products and services. - . 4 ,,' \z'' • New carpet was installed in December in the CenterPlace reception area and two administrative offices. It has certainly brightened things up, since the carpet that was replaced was original to the building and very worn. Carpet squares were used and will be easier to maintain or repair in the future. • We have been recruiting for the vacant front desk Office Assistant 1 position. The position has been vacant since September and we hope to have someone on board in January. lih t ,x+ $ ' a i .F�.d� - ”" '+ titc. '' i"- L� '4'Vtrt,i""-'02-"--"`et.'-:" -z-..-!"-•.-S' RC2 ,! Y�A- ''L F '- '._ `� :".4:•.i.'{: 2 RECREATION AND AQUATICS: "vi .......!,,iis 0A, —, . 1r .v`T' • There were 700 brave souls over the four nights who dared to venture through the Valley Mission Haunted Pool event. Jennifer Papich, our Recreation Coordinator, recruited and coordinated 90 t , ; ''-- a ' 1 local area high school volunteers from East Valley, Central Valley, and - { '' li *s University High Schools and Eastern Washington University, which i ,r •' ` make the event possible. On top of being affordable to attend, there % II were also 600 pounds of foodgathered and donated to Spokane P Valley Partners, which is 140 more pounds than last year. fs • In addition to the Haunted Pool, we held the first ever"Spooktacular Event"for preschoolers, at Valley Mission Pool on Halloween afternoon. The little ghouls a, ; i. and boys had their faces painted tried their skills with an organized mini a - ., scavenger hunt with carnival-type games for prizes along the pool deck still decorated from the Haunted Pool. There were 50 preschoolers and their parents �` #' who joined in on the fun. ''A Nia • Staff attended the Community Connections events at Central Valley High School jk, , 446, rik and Spokane Valley Tech to learn more about those schools and listen to the 1 CVSD"report card." • Staff submitted a Lodging Tax Fund application and presented .., -- a grant proposal for the Browns Park Volleyball expansion, 1 _1 along with the Evergreen Region Volleyball Association. ` a ; . ' -r L ' v , i - • Jennifer made a presentation to the Eastern Washington University Recreation Major students regarding a career in the . . ,--..t. ' , field of Parks and Recreation. She also spoke of future _ - : ' _ volunteer and seasonal job opportunities with the Spokane . '." f.._0_4_ ~— , 7110e ipit Valley Parks and Recreation Department. _ tilt4- • Staff also had a presentation for the Summit Elementary School First and - , Second Grade students in the CenterPlace Auditorium. Jennifer talked about what a Parks and Recreation Department does, and other City - staff educated the kids about stormwater. • Jennifer attended the Annual Meeting and Breakfast of the Greater �'• Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce. She had the opportunity to have , 'ars„.... _, a booth and present "30-second "in which she hi hli hted .' �' a commercial . 9 9 our Outdoor Movie Sponsorship opportunities. t � } _ i ,i ,a • The Parks and Recreation Dept. and the Spokane Valley Rotary Club /i—i �" partnered once again to host the 7th Annual Breakfast with - - Santa at CenterPlace There were 515 hungry and excited F; * -.niv ' people who attended. With the help of 42 amazing High dir School Key Club volunteers serving food, conducting arts and _ ,t` craft projects, busing tables and seating guests, this '_ `-'�` Al It 4 r`' 'i„ftj re 4 community event was a success. :}' `qi lit . ' • We offered the Winter Break Cool Camp for the second year in a row. There were 41 campers that attended the two-week -.". ' : - r;: 1,111.0911: I program, which is 24 more campers than last year. k__ 3 SENIOR CENTER: i 1 • Medicare Open Enrollment was October 15 `_ iIr . ts through December 7. SHIBA scheduled r , �; b appointments at the Senior Center to assist seniors �,, in choosing the best program for their individual I needs. There were 10-15 people served each month. �.�(ti , Many who come for information are not members, but , they see our beautiful facility and what we have to --'�rr offer here, so several decide to join and take part in 1, � J the many activities the Association offers. QC • The Senior Association held an election of new board _ ti - members. New board members are: Dan Petruso, - - Chuck Post, and Roland Williams. ` S Is, The Association updated their bylaws and presented • k. them at their annual meeting to the general membership I for approval. The motion passed. 14. aiiii 4.-t • The Monday knitting group continues to grow in e 4 II numbers, with an average of 20 ladies each week. They knit hats, gloves, lap robes, etc. and donate them to the _ �- . , Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP). • Pine needle basket making is increasing steadily, and there _ — . a4, r11 1,;..4:were 42 ladies one month. a • ,itAlk • The Association collected for Coats for Kids again this year, „• 1 =s," -_,40 k l and collected a total of 48 coats. -,,kv ,4 '%. „e iia'. `. • The Senior Association has been quite thoughtful and giving, te)% - `)� helping out citizens in our area. They gave a donation to the YMCA for their program for cancer survivors. Also, members of the Senior Center can enjoy exercise equipment and pool use and other amenities for a $4 day pass instead of$10 per day. In addition, the Association gave a donation to The Hub Sports Center to help defray costs and allow seniors to play pickleball for $2 a day rather than $4. • Walgreens Pharmacy provided "at no cost" pneumonia and shingles shots for 90 seniors who signed up. Walgreens received a grant from the state and offered to dispense the shots at our location. Generally, the shingle shot can cost $90-$200. • Senior Center membership is Numbers That Count... October November December open to citizens 50 years of age and older. The average age of Total Attendance 3,439 2,828 1,953 Senior Center participants this Billiards Room Participants 488 324 430 quarter was 74.7 years young. pickleball Participants 418 472 488 4 Si v1 i .Valley. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT January 2015 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Total of Contract Expended Contract Name Contractor Contract Amount as of 1/31/15 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $0.00 0.00% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $0.00 0.00% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $0.00 0.00% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $40,000.00 $4,892.48 12.23% Landscaping Out to Bid Unknown $0.00 0.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $530.46 5.30% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00* $3,895.04 6.49% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00* $0.00** 0.00% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $582,000.00* $0.00** 0.00% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00* $1,960.00 9.80% * Budget estimates ** Does not include January 2015 —waiting on invoices Citizen Requests for Public Works 80 70 N 60 It — +. a = 50 — a cu cc 40 — c N 30 — — l u 20 — 10 Total Citizen Snow/Ice Dead Roadway Pothole Sign & Storm Traffic Requests: Animal Signal Drainage/ Public Removal Removal Hazard Requests Requests Erosion Requests Works ■Submitted 68 14 16 3 5 14 4 12 ■In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■Resolved 68 14 16 3 5 14 4 12 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.qov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.org/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for January 2015: • The Geiger crew picked up 3,820 lbs. of litter from our arterial roadways. • The Dead Animal control officer removed 13 deer from the City's right of way. January 2015 Snow and Ice Operations Date Mag(Gallons) Iceslicer(Tons) Snowfall Pre-Treat Deicing Plowing Comments 01/01/15 0.0 01/02/15 2400 48.00 0.8 X X 01/03/15 6350 11.00 0.5 X 01/04/15 22.00 3.6 X Plowed 1's,2's and 3's 01/05/15 0.0 01/06/15 0.0 01/07/15 1650 0.0 X X Bridges,Hills 01/08/15 1600 0.0 X X Bridges,Hills 01/09/15 4500 0.0 X Pretreatment 01/10/15 3275 23.00 0.8 X X Deiced,Iceslicer on 1's 01/11/15 2000 Trace X 01/12/15 0.0 01/13/15 100 0.1 X 01/14/15 0.0 01/15/15 3450 1.0 X Deice Hillsides and#1's 01/16/15 1500 0.6 X 01/17/15 0.6 01/18/15 0.0 01/19/15 600 0.0 X 01/20/15 2500 0.0 X 01/21/15 0.0 01/22/15 3800 4.00 2.1 X X Pretreatment 01/23/15 1250 16.00 0.0 X X X Plowed Hillside Routes 01/24/15 0.0 01/25/15 0.0 01/26/15 0.0 01/27/15 0.0 01/28/15 0.0 01/29/15 0.0 01/30/15 200 Trace X 01/31/15 1400 0.3 X X Bridges,Hills Totals 36,575 124.00 10.40 Season Totals 83,525 235.00 14.60 *Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS Spoane�.�"' `� Public Works Projects .Valley. Monthly Summary-Design&Construction January-2015 Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open %Complete Construction Project # Design&Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA-BR 06/27/14 07/18/14 100 2 09/30/16 $15,833,333 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 04/17/15 05/08/15 95 0 08/31/15 $ 2,002,350 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 03/06/15 03/27/15 85 0 10/31/15 $ 722,795 0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project CDBG 03/06/15 03/27/15 35 0 06/30/15 $ 287,094 Street Preservation Projects 0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley&Wellesley COSV 03/06/15 03/27/15 98 0 07/30/15 $ 660,279 0218 Montgomery Ave St Preservation COSV 04/17/15 05/08/15 5 0 12/31/15 $ 285,890 0220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation COSV 04/17/15 05/01/15 5 0 12/31/15 $ 316,965 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade(SRTC 06-3) FHWA-CMAQ 11/07/14 12/05/14 100 0 08/31/15 $ 1,721,880 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 03/30/15 04/17/15 95 0 06/30/15 $ 474,580 Stormwater Projects 0197 Broadway,Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit Dept of Ecology 05/15/15 06/05/15 40 0 06/30/15 $ 60,000 Other Projects 0149 Sidewalklnfill FHWA-CMAQ 08/08/14 08/29/14 100 90 06/30/15 $ 1,139,955 0176 Appleway Trail COSV 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 32 05/30/15 $ 1,605,400 Design&Construction $25,110,521 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Complete Open %Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15 11 $ 517,919 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 02/15/14 89 $ 175,260 0142 Broadway@Argonne/Mullan FHWA-STP(U) 08/31/15 90 $ 276,301 0201 ITS Infill Project-Phase 1 FHWA-CMAQ 03/01/15 5 $ 327,562 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSV 06/01/15 5 $ 51,619 0221 McDonald Rd Diet(16th to Mission) COSV TBD 0 $ 616,000 Street Preservation Projects 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/01/15 90 $ 1,156,500 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 02/28/15 98 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15 90 $ 200,000 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates HSIP 08/30/15 0 $ 81,000 Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study Dept of Ecology 02/28/15 40 $ 300,000 0198 Sprague,Park to University LID Dept of Ecology 01/31/15 40 $ 20,000 0199 Havana-Yale Diversion Dept of Ecology 03/31/15 33 $ 20,000 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion Dept of Ecology 03/31/15 36 $ 20,000 Other Projects 0145 Spokane Valley-Millwood Trail FHWA-STP(E) 02/15/15 5 $ 402,300 Design only $ 4,414,172 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for January 2015: • Street Sweeping Services Bid opened January 23, 2015. • Stormwater Utility rolls for 2014, including reviewing 20% of the commercial properties for accuracy in fee collection was completed and certified. • Storm Drain Cleaning Services Specification was updated and discussed with the contractor for use of the new Decant Facility. • Roadway Landscaping Services is being reviewed to go out to bid since the contractor did not want to proceed with a contract in 2015 (which would have been the 3rd option year of 5). The contractor had worked for the City for 3 years from 2012 through the end of 2014. • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, (see below). • Staff submitted 5 applications for Ecology's competitive funding for Stormwater projects and activities in early November. On February 13, 2015 we find out how the City's applications stacked up against other projects from around the State. GRANTS 2018-2020 CMAQ and TAP Call for Proiects City staff continues to evaluate proposed projects that would be good candidates for the upcoming round of CMAQ and TAP Call for Projects due April 30th, 2015. City staff has met with STA and Spokane County staff to discuss projects these jurisdictions are pursuing in their 6-year plans, especially those projects that interface with City of Spokane Valley streets. In addition, staff reviewed the city's candidate project list with these jurisdictions to garner their support and cooperation. A meeting is scheduled in February, 2015 to discuss similar topics with WSDOT staff. TRAFFIC Sullivan Road Study The final TAC meeting occurred in October, with the distribution of a Draft Report to TAC members for review and comments. The final report incorporating comments received were prepared in November. Staff will present the results of the draft final report to Council in December. The final report incorporating comments received will be finalized in January. University Overpass Study Staff is continuing to coordinate with the consultant on the University Overpass study. Staff has provided comments on the Draft Report, which was distributed to TAC members for review and comment. Development Proiects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering. *Information in bold indicates updates 4