Loading...
Agenda 05/14/2015 Valle H Siia5kane Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda City Hall Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. May 14, 2015 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 23, 2015 VI. COMMISSION REPORTS VII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject which is not on the agenda. IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS: • Public Hearing — CTA-2015-0004 Administrative Exceptions • Public Hearing — Comprehensive Plan Citizen Amendment Requests for inclusion in the Legislative Update X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT Minutes Spokane Valley Planning Commission Council Chambers—City Hall, April 23,2015 Vice-Chairman Anderson called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Commissioners, staff and audience stood for the pledge of allegiance. Ms. Horton took roll and the following members and staff were present: Kevin Anderson Lori Barlow, Heather Graham Cary Driskell,City Attorney Tim Kelley Micki Harnois,Planner Mike Phillips Christina Janssen,Planner Susan Scott Marty Palaniuk,Planner Joe Stoy,absent excused Sam Wood Deanna Horton, Secretary of the Commission Hearing no objections Commission Stoy was excused from the April 23, 2015 meeting. Commissioner Anderson moved to accept the April 9, 2015 agenda as presented. The vote to approve the agenda was seven in favor, zero against. The motion passed. Commissioner Wood moved to accept the April 23, 2015 agenda, however it was noted the date on the agenda was April 09 and it stated the minutes to approve were for March 26, 2015. The minutes for approval were for April 09, 2015. The motion passed. Commissioner Wood moved to accept the April 09, 2015 minutes as presented. The vote to approve the minutes was seven in favor, zero against. The motion passed. COMMISSION REPORTS: Commissioners Scott, Phillips and Anderson reported they attended the Comprehensive Plan Vision Report Update meeting. Commissioner Scott also attended the Senior Resource Day which was held at CenterPlace. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT: Senior Planner Lori Barlow reported on the Comprehensive Plan Vision Report Meeting. PUBLIC COMMENT: There was no public comment. COMMISSION BUSINESS: Study Session — CTA-2015-0004 Proposed Text Amendments to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.090 Residential accessory uses and structures and 19.140 Administrative Exceptions: Planner Christina Janssen gave a presentation to the Commission outlining the proposed amendments to the SVMC 19.140 Administrative Exceptions and 19.40.090 residential accessory uses. Ms. Janssen stated the proposed amendment was a result of the discussions which staff had previously had with the Commission regarding these subjects. The administrative exceptions would be changed to "An administrative exception may be approved for minor deviations to code requirements in the following circumstances,provided the exception is consistent with the criteria in section 19.140.020." The proposed criteria changes are as follows based on the previous discussion with the Commissioners: A. Yard setback requirements where the deviations for 10 percent or less of the required yard; 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 1 of 7 B. Minimum lot area requirement where the deviation is for 10 percent or less of the required lot area; C. Lot width or depth where the deviation is for 10 percent or less than the required lot width or depth. While reviewing the remaining criteria Commissioner Phillips commented on item D which states "The exception shall not apply to a series of parcels;for example, it should not be used to reduce size or frontage of a series of lots to create another lot." Mr. Phillips stated he thought part of the previous discussion had been being able to allow the exception to be on multiple parcels so an extra lot could be created. He said he felt the exception should not be limited to one or two lots. Staff discussed the options available to being able to modify one or two parcels to achieve the same result Mr. Phillips is trying to accomplish. Commissioner Scott asked to confirm the allowance for changes to minimum lot requirements was changed to 10 percent or less of the required lot area. Because of the nature of the changes, some of the criteria were deleted because they are addressed in other sections of the code. There is also language cleanup which the City has been continually doing to create uniformity throughout the SVMC. In discussing the changes to 19.40.090 accessory structures, Commissioner Scott also asked for the definition of an accessory structure. Ms. Barlow stated according to the SVMC, an accessory structure is defined as `Accessory:A building, area, part of a building, structure or use which is subordinate to, and the use of which is incidental to, that of the main building, structure or use on the same lot." Commissioner Anderson noted he did not remember any discussion of removing the word `permanent' in the proposed amendment. The proposal is to modify the allowed accessory structures on a parcel from 10 percent of the lot area to lots having 10,000 square feet or less may have up to 1,000 square feet of accessory structures and lots having greater than 10,000 square feet may have accessory structures that shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot size. Mr. Anderson said he felt a building, such as a garden shed or above ground pool, which could be portably moved or replaced should not be included in the calculation of the lot coverage. Ms.Barlow explained the City has been calculating all structures on the property when looking to calculate the lot coverage and staff is not looking to change this part of the code. Staff explained the code has been interpreted in this manner since incorporation and removing the word would help to clear things up for customers who can get confused when coming in for a permit. Trying to define currently what is and is not a permanent structure at this time is beyond the scope of the current amendment. Commissioner Graham felt it was more than semantics to remove the word however, Ms. Barlow assured her the City has a definition of structure in the SVMC "Structure:Any construction, including a building or any portion thereof erected for the purposes of support, shelter or enclosure of persons, animals or property of any kind, including swimming pools, decks in excess of 30 inches in height, and roof overhangs exceeding three feet. A fence of six feet or less in height is not a structure, nor a masonry, brick, concrete, or cinder block wall of less than four feet in height." Commissioner Anderson argued he did not feel it was the same, there were permanent and portable structures. He said there was a definition of a structure and of an accessory structure but no definition of a permanent structure. Commissioner Wood said when he does an appraisal he is not allowed to assign a value for above ground pools, on portable sheds, or portable greenhouses as they do not have value, because they can be moved and taken down too easily. He felt when the word permanent was removed,those types of things were being allowed into the definition. City Attorney Cary Driskell stated he did not want to confuse value for purposes of sale with zoning regulations. One of his concerns would be someone bringing in non-permanent storage onto a property and using them,which is not unheard of in the City, to fill up with items and completely filling up the property. This has been a problem on some Code Enforcement cases. Mr. Driskell stated he would like to look into it before making any changes to what staff has proposed. Mr. Anderson felt there should be some allowance made for garden sheds which could be loaded into the back of a pickup truck. Mr. Anderson feels the staff has 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 2 of 7 been misinterpreting the code. Commissioner Phillips stated if the word permanent was removed from the language he would not support the change. Ms. Barlow reminded the Commission that deliberations, after the public hearing, would be the appropriate time to have a discussion regarding making changes to the proposed language, statements of support or denial of the proposed amendment. Study Session — CTA-2015-0004 Proposed Text Amendments to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) 19.40.090 Residential accessory uses and structures and 19.140 Administrative Exceptions: Ms. Barlow gave a presentation to explain where in the process the legislative update to the Comprehensive Plan currently is. She briefly discussed the Vision Report which was just issued prior to the last community meeting on April 15, 2015. Ms. Barlow explained this study session was to discuss the citizen-initiated amendment requests (CARS) which have been received by the City. These amendments will be reviewed differently than normal Comprehensive Plan amendments. These amendments will be not reviewed at this time for approval as they have been in the past but for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan Update Analysis. The options for these amendments will be to determine if they should be included in the Comprehensive Plan Update Analysis, should they be deferred to a future update or should they not be included in the Comprehensive Plan update analysis. Currently the consultants assisting with the Comprehensive Plan Update are working to do the data gathering for the City which includes a land quantity analysis and a market analysis among other things. This data gathering will help the City to know what types of land uses the community needs. The City received 26 CAR applications in total, 19 map change requests, five text amendment requests and two overlay requests. The public hearing regarding the requests for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan Update is scheduled for May 14,2015 with a deliberation meeting scheduled for May 18,2015. The findings have been scheduled for presentation on May 28,2015. Staff then reviewed the CAR applications with the Commission. CAR-2015-0001 — Addressed as 1618 N. Sargent Rd. Requesting to change from Office to High Density Residential/from Garden office to Multifamily-2. Near the old University of Phoenix site, faces R-3 zoning,feels it would be better used if MF-2. CAR-2015-0002 — Addressed as 115 and 117 N McDonald Rd. Requesting to change from Low Density Residential to Corridor Mixed Use/from R-3 to Corridor Mixed Use. Sites do have homes on them. CAR-2015-0003 — Is a vacant lot east of Conklin and south of Broadway, just to the east of the Kohl's/Lowes development area. Requesting to change from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential/from R-3 to Multifamily-2. This is just to the east of a Comprehensive Plan amendment similar to this approved a couple of years ago. CAR-2015-0004—Addressed as 226 and 302 S. Sullivan and adjacent vacant lot; 15411 and 15423 E. 4th; and 15410 E. 2nd Ave. Requesting to change from Office/Medium Density Residential to Neighborhood Commercial from Office/MF-1 to Neighborhood Commercial. There was discussion from the Commission about what uses are across the right-of-way along Sullivan, across from this request. CAR-2015-0010 and 0011 —Addressed as 13215 and 13313 E. 4th Ave. Requesting to change from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential from MF-1 to MF-2. Commissioner Anderson asked if there was any issue in the request being proposed by someone who is not a property owner. In this request, one of the parcels is owned by the requestor and the other one is not but the requestor has an option to purchase the other piece of property. Mr. Driskell said he would 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 3 of 7 have to look into the legality of whether or not a request could be made by someone who was not the property owner. Ms. Barlow stated it is within the City's power to change the zoning on property regardless of who owns it,however the reason the City is accepting applications in this manner at this particular update is allowing the community the opportunity to make requests to consider these requests in the update process. This is how these requests are different than the normal process. These requests will not be approved, the City will be looking to focus the analysis to make sure the requests make sense. Ms. Barlow stated that she would expect that some requests will not only become part of the update, but some could very well be expanded depending on what the analysis said. Commissioner Graham asked if this request came forward, would the consultants look at this request. Ms. Barlow said the consultants are looking at the zoning districts to determine if the City has the right amount of land in each of the zones. Commissioner Scott asked if the property owner would be notified of the requested change,to which Ms.Barlow answered yes. CAR-2015-0012 — Is a vacant lot which faces Skipworth just north of Sprague Ave. Requesting to change from High Density Residential to Corridor Mixed Use/from MF-2 to Corridor Mixed Use. CAR-2015-0013 —Addressed as 8021 E. Broadway Ave. Requesting to change from Office to High Density Residential/ from Office to MF-2. This request is east of Centennial Middle School. The applicant stated they feel there is too much office in this area and not enough High Density Residential. CAR-2015-0015—Addressed as 15316 and 15324 E Valleyway Ave. Requesting a change from Low Density Residential to Community Commercial/ from R-4 to Community Commercial. These properties are just to the west of Sullivan Rd. CAR-2015-0016 — Located at the intersection of Barker and Laberry. Requesting to change from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential/ from MF-1 to MF-2. It is identified as the Southern Manufactured Home Park. Ms. Barlow stated some of the history for this request is approximately in 1996 Ms. Southern applied and was granted a High Density Residential zoning for her properties, which also include two properties to the south. When the City adopted its first Comprehensive Plan the designation was changed where the manufactured home park is located to Medium Density Residential. Ms. Southern and her children are requesting the designation revert back to what it was before the implementation of the City's first Comprehensive Plan change. Commissioner Anderson asked what would change in the manufactured home park if the change was granted. Ms. Barlow commented nothing would change, because the use on the property is allowed in the High Density Residential zone and the property is already developed. These parcels are also being requested to be incorporated into the manufactured home park overlay request. Ms. Barlow noted this would be a time when you have conflicting interests, or requests for the same property. Ms. Southern is requesting to change her property to a higher density, yet the manufactured home park people are requesting protections so the property owner can't change their property without taking steps to protect the renters who live there. Commissioner Graham stated she was going to have to consider recusing herself from this amendment, based on an amendment request in 2014 which was in this same area. Commissioner Phillips asked if staff expected for the public hearing to be concluded in one evening based on the testimony from the last time testimony was taken from the neighborhood of Sprague and Barker. Ms. Barlow stated she had no idea if there would be a great deal of testimony or if there would be very little,but staff have planned for an extra meeting on May 18,just to allow for the extra time needed to try and deliberate if necessary. CAR-2015-0017 — Addressed as 807 N. Argonne Rd. Requesting to change from Office to Neighborhood Commercial/from Garden Office to Neighborhood Commercial. This property owner as well had requested a change in approximately 1990 from the County and is requesting to have that 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 4 of 7 designation returned to them from the change which took place when the City implemented its first Comprehensive Plan. CAR-2015-0019 — Addressed as 13520 E. Nora Ave. Requesting to change from Office to Community Commercial/from Office to Community Commercial. Mr. Palaniuk stated this is located to the east of one of the Comprehensive Plan amendments from this year. It is an area in which staff will be looking at the zoning to determine what would be more appropriate along this feeder road next to the freeway. CAR-2015-0020—Addressed as 12717, 12725, 12803, 12815, 12823 and 12903 4th Ave. Requesting to change from Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential/from MF-1 to MF-2. This request is located along 4th Ave behind Bumpers Bowling and Family Fun. Applicant is considering apartments since it will be close to the Appleway Trail and services on Sprague Ave. These are all of the map amendment requests. The next two are text amendment requests and then two requests to develop overlay zones. CPA-2015-0021 —This is a text amendment request to change the Office and Garden Office zones to allow multifamily residential uses in each zone. Currently residential uses are allowed in the Garden Office zone when it is on the second floor. Ms. Barlow noted the Office zoning districts and Multifamily zoning districts will be among those staff will be taking a closer look at during the Comprehensive Plan update. CAR-2015-0023 — This is a text amendment request from the Greater Valley Support Network requesting to create affordable housing incentives in addition to a density bonus. Suggesting in addition to density bonus allow possible height and bulk bonus, fee waivers or exemptions, parking reductions or expedited permitting. Commissioner Anderson asked if there was a definition for affordable housing. Ms. Barlow stated there is not a definition in the City's code,there is a definition which relates specifically to income levels, however the City does not have any programs which implement those specific programs. She said the City has a density bonus allowance, which has never been used, but the group feels it is too limiting and they would like to broaden it to include these other incentives. CAR-2015-0023 —This is a text amendment request from the Greater Valley Support Network to add a policy to support a broad and diverse range of housing types, including micro-housing, co-housing and other types. Currently the City policies do not prevent these other styles of housing options. However,the group wants to make sure these other styles of housing options are considered,these are types they are specifically interested in at the moment. CAR-2015-0024 — This is a text amendment request from the Greater Valley Support Network for a goal for the developers to engage the neighborhoods regarding a project at an earlier point, for the city to develop guidelines for constructive communications between the two parties and for the development of a process for this to occur. Commissioner Anderson asked who the Greater Valley Support Network was. Ms. Barlow answered they are a special interest consortium of housing interest groups. Commissioner Wood asked which councilmembers were participating in this group, and Councilmembers Pace and Woodard were the two confirmed members. CAR-2015-0026 — This is a request to require the City to develop manufactured home displacement policies. The request requires a manufactured home park owner to provide assistance beyond what is required by the RCW 51.20 Manufactured/Mobile Home Landlord-Tenant Act. It would require the City to review, approve and administer a relocation and report plan. The next two requests are map overlays. CAR-2015-0018 — This is a map request to develop a mineral resource land overlay, add a mineral resource land chapter and designate specific sites as mineral resource lands. Ms.Barlow said the City 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 5 of 7 has already decided to look at this issue,this request is asking to have this looked at very specifically. Commissioner Anderson asked if the City was going to require the property owner to prove they owned the mineral rights for the property before the overlay was placed on the property. Mr. Driskell stated he felt there would be a full discussion of the subject at the appropriate time. CAR-2015-0025 — This is a map request to develop a manufactured home park overlay for every manufactured home park in the City. Staff will be providing a slimmed down version of the staff report with each amendment request in the next packet. Mr. Driskell asked the Planning Commissioners not to go out and visit the sites as individuals or as small groups in order that some are not considering these with different criteria than the whole commission has the opportunity to consider. Commissioner Wood asked to confirm that Mr. Driskell was asking the Commissioners to not go out and visit these sites, which was confirmed. Mr. Driskell stated he would confirm with Community and Economic Development Director John Hohman when he returned to the office as to how they felt would be the most appropriate way to handle this issue. Study Session—Subdivision Regulations discussions: Planner Marty Palaniuk gave a presentation regarding the discussion for some subdivision changes staff is asking the Planning Commission to consider. Currently corner lots are required to be 15 percent larger than interior lots in order to provide a buildable area after setbacks from both adjacent streets. Corner lots can have issues because of side, flanking, front and rear yard setbacks and border easements on two streets. Border easements vary depending on the needs of the right-of-way. Setbacks are measured from the border easement. One option would be to link the corner lot widths to the minimum lot widths of the underlying zones. Regardless of the setbacks,border easements for the buildable lot width would still be the same size as the minimum lot width of the underlying zone. Another option could be to create a minimum lot width for corner lots for each zone. A third option could be to remove the requirement the corner lot be 15% larger and hope the developer will plan for a buildable corner lot. Commissioner Anderson asked why the flanking yard setback was so large. Mr. Palaniuk stated it allowed for a bit of privacy from road traffic, from noise, pedestrians, and in case of the City's need for further right-of-way, it would not be right up against the home. Staffs conclusion is corner lots need adequate widths and the current 15 percent increase in size is not appropriate in all cases. Commissioner Phillips feels the third option is best because most people who plat out subdivisions know how to make sure there is a buildable area on the corner lot. Ms. Barlow said that on occasion when a developer is laying out a subdivision, frequently he forgets about the setbacks and easements and the City has to give an exception when the property owner comes in and wants to build a home on the lot which does not fit. It could also create a lot which would have a home which would be notably smaller in comparison to the rest of the homes in the subdivision. Commissioner Scott said it is not the City's obligation when the house will not fit on the property. Mr. Palaniuk commented, many times people will have invested in the property, hired an architect, had the house drawn up before they come in and figure out what the setbacks and easements are. Many times people do not do all the homework they should before they do some of the work. Commissioner Wood moved to extend the meeting to 9:10 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous, the motion passed. Commissioner Anderson stated we are focusing on the width but not the depth, the house could face the other street. Mr. Palaniuk pointed out how it could change the size of the lot in that case. Commissioner Phillips commented it was not the City's responsibility to protect against every possible issue. Commissioner Wood stated he likes the way Airway Heights does it, they allow the developer to figure out what a developable lot is and he is not a believer that government should 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 7 come up with every single exception. He would prefer to give the developer the freedom. He likes option 3. Commissioner Scott stated she preferred option 2, she asked if when someone brings in a plat, did someone look at it and tell the applicant it was a problem. Mr. Palaniuk stated when a submittal comes in they look at the design standards and evaluate the proposal to see if it meets those standards. She asked if anyone ever drew out a corner lot and showed it could be a problem. Mr. Palaniuk responded no. Ms. Barlow stated we discuss what the setbacks are and that they are measured from the border easements. However, if the builder/developer says, that is good enough, then the conversation stops. What staff is trying to say is there is no authority for the City to say anything more than the corner lots needs to be 15 percent greater and there are times when that isn't working. Commissioner Anderson asked if we tell the applicant what the maximum building could be, staff said we explain what the setbacks are, he asked if that could be confused. Commissioner Graham feels there should be some regulation telling there should be some lot width. This subject will need further discussion. Commissioner Scott moved to extend the meeting to 9:20 p.m. The vote on the motion was unanimous, the motion passed. The next subject is screening of lots which back up on an arterial. This section of the code has two types of screening; screening device is not defined. The suggested option is to require a six-foot sight obstructing fence with Type II vegetative plantings. Commissioner Anderson asked who maintained the vegetation. He has a problem with the trees and the liability of the trees, and the cost to maintain the trees as a mandatory. He has no problem with the developer putting the trees in, but he has a problem with the City requiring the trees being put in. Mr. Palaniuk explained this is already a requirement of the SVMC, staff is just looking to clarify the code. Commissioner Phillips stated along 32nd Ave in one section of a development they put up fences right up against the right-of-way and in a different phase, the fence is setback from the right-of-way. He said it is more expensive to put the fence back from the right-of-way and more desirable to look at, if it is maintained. He feels a six-foot sight obscuring fence is not always the answer. He believes you cannot make people do what they don't want to do. You can't make people mow down weeds if they don't want to. He said he understands the need but he doesn't think a fence is the only answer. Mr. Palaniuk stated this would only apply to principal arterials,not collector arterials,roads like Pines, Sullivan, 32nd Ave., etc. Mr. Palaniuk said the idea of the fence is to limit noise onto the property and to limit access to the property from those busy streets. Right now the code requires a screening device consistent with that section of the code, but it does not say which type of device, this is to just to clarify what type of device. The next little thing is the submittal of a final plat. There is a requirement for an electronic submittal and staff would like to eliminate this requirement. Commissioner Phillips stated he was in complete agreement with this and had argued against this since it had been adopted. GOOD OF THE ORDER: Nothing was offered for the Good of the Order ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Joe Stoy, Chairperson Date signed Deanna Horton, Secretary 04-23-15 Planning Commission Minutes Page 7 of 7 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: May 14, 2015 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation FILE NUMBER: CTA-2015-0004 AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing—Administrative Exceptions DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Updates to Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) Chapters 19.40.090(Residential accessory uses and structures) and 19.140(Administrative Exceptions) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.106; SVMC 17.80.150 and 19.30.040 PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None. BACKGROUND: Since City incorporation in March 2003,development regulations have included Administrative Exceptions. The intent of the Administrative Exception is to allow minor exceptions to specific code requirements when necessary to accommodate development. With the adoption of the City's development regulations in October 2007,language was included that significantly narrowed the circumstances in which the administrative exception may be applied. As a result of this,administrative exceptions have been used regularly to make adjustments to the code requirements which do not strictly meet the requirements for approval,but do fall within the parameters of SVMC 19.140.010. Staff worked with the Commission on the development of these proposed regulations.At this time language has been developed to amend the code that will clarify under what circumstances an Administrative Exception may be granted. The Planning Commission conducted a study session on this amendment on April 23,2015. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to recommend approval of CTA-2015-0001 to City Council. STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen,Planner ATTACHMENTS: A. Proposed language SVMC 19.40.090 B. Proposed language SVMC 19.140 C. Presentation RPCA for CTA-2015-0004 Administrative Exception Public Hearing 19.40.090 Residential accessory uses and structures.° SHARE A._Except for the air conditioning compressors of detached single family residential, Ceooling towers and similar accessory structures are required to observe all front, side or rear yards. B. The combined building footprint of all accessory permanent structures in residential zoning districts shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area.Accessory structure(s)are permitted as follows: 1.Fef--1Lots equal to, or less than, 10,000 sq. ft. in size may have up to=1,000 sq. ft. of accessory structure(s) 2.For 1Lots greater than 10,000 sq. ft. in size may have accessory structure that shall not exceed =10 percent of lot size C. The vertical wall of an in-ground swimming pool shall be located behind front building setback lines and at least five feet from the property line. All pools must shall be secured in accordance with the requirements of the adopted building regulationscodes. Temporary fencing is required during excavation. (Ord. 08-006 § 1,2008; Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007). Chapter 19.140 ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS Sections: 19.140.010 PurposeAllowed Exceptions. 19.140.020 Approval criteria. 19.140.030 Process. 19.140.010 Allowed Exceptions osc.O SHARE 7 An administrative exception may be considered approved,only for adjustments necessary to correct errors resulting from the inadvertent and unintentional placement of structures or incorrect identification of lot boundaries for minor deviations to code requirements in the following circumstances,provided the exception is consistent with the criteria in section 19.140.020 A. Any dimensional requirement which does not exceed one foot. B. Under the following conditions: 1. A parcel established prior to March 31, 2003,that does not meet the buildable square footage requirements for a parcel in a particular zoning district; or 2. A legally nonconforming dwelling with respect to setbacks,height and size which otherwise could not be expanded or reconstructed; or 3. A duplex constructed prior to March 31, 2003, that does not meet the minimum parcel size,which could not otherwise be reconstructed. A.-Yard setback requirements where the deviation is for 10 percent or less of the required yard. D. Building height requirements where the deviation is for 25 percent or less of the maximum building height. Additional building height may be granted to the equivalent height of adjacent buildings in areas where the maximum building height is generally exceeded. EB.Minimum lot area requirements where the deviation is for 25 10 percent or less of the required lot area. F. Maximum building coverage requirements where the deviation is for 25 percent or less of the maximum building coverage. C..&Lot width under the following circumstances:or depth where the deviation is for 10 percent or less than the required lot width or depth. 1. Lot width requirements where the deviation is for 10 percent or less than the required lot width. 2. Lot width requirements where the deviation is greater than 10 percent;provided, that the department may require notice to affected agencies resulting in conditions of approval. H. Up to one half of a private tower's impact area off of the applicant's property. 1. At the time the subject parcel was legally created the property was zoned under a zoning classification of the pre January 1, 1991, Spokane County zoning ordinance, and subsequently on January 1, 1991, a new zoning classification from the zoning code of Spokane County, Washington, was assigned to the subject property; and 2. Any flanking yard setback deviation granted under this section shall not exceed the required flanking street setback standards of the pre January 1, 1991, zoning classification of the subject property. J. Any improved property rendered nonconforming through voluntary dedication of right of way, the exercise of eminent domain proceedings or purchase of right of way by the City, county, state or federal agency. (Ord. 11 010 § 1 (Exh. A), 2011; Ord. 10 015 § 2, 2010; Ord. 07 015 § 'I, 2007). 19.140.020 Approval criteria l.a SHARE The Director shall Criteria for approv4e or denyital of the applications shall be established by the director if it is shown thatbased on the following criteria: A. The administrative exception does not detract from the character and nature of the neighborhood or vicinity in which it is proposed; B. The administrative exception enhances or protects the character of the neighborhood or vicinity by protecting natural features,historic sites,open space,or other resources; C. The administrative exception does not interfere with or negatively impact the operations of existing land uses and all legally permitted uses within the zoning district it occupies; D. The exception shall not apply to a series of parcels; for example,it shall not be used to reduce size or frontage of a series of lots to create another lot; DE. The administrative exception shall not be used to increase density beyond what is currently allowed within the zoning district;.- F. The exception shall not be contrary to conditions imposed by any other associated land use action,for example, a Hearing Examiner Decision,or conditions associated with the applicable short plat approval; G. The exception shall not conflict with other local, state or federal laws; and HD. Granting the administrative exception does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and welfare within the City. (Ord. 10-015 § 2,2010;Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007). 19.140.030 Process J0 SHARE J An administrative exception is classified as a Type I permit and shall be processed pursuant to SVMC 17.80.070. (Ord. 10-015 § 2,2010;Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007 Spokane COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11"111r3qPtAlinririll."11111LIVS2ivrsIary -� j dal ley Planning Commission Public Hearing May 14th, 2015 Residential accessory uses and structures SVMC 19 .40 . 090 Administrative Exceptions SVMC 19 . 140 Spdkare dal"ley COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - y NGD� !visIONI � ` Administrative Exceptions Chapter 19. 140 SVMC Administrative Exception : A minor deviation from standards pursuant to Chapter 19 . 140 SVMC. Spilka ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - 11AME2ivisioN jdalley Administrative Exceptions Chapter 19. 140 SVMC 19. 140.010 Purpose. An administrative exception may be considered only for adjustments necessary to correct errors resulting from the inadvertent and unintentional placement of structures or incorrect identification of lot boundaries in the following circumstances : Spilka COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �P Nl� G Divrsiory -� 19. 140.010 Allowed Exceptions. An administrative exception may be approved for minor deviations to code requirements in the following circumstances, provided the exception is consistent with the criteria in section 19 . 140 . 020 Spilka " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT aP NIXING Divrsiory j dal ley Existing code provisions: 'p{ n 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ANNING DIVISION al A. Any dimensional requirement which does not exceed 1 foot; B. Under the following conditions: 1 . A parcel established prior to March 31, 2003, that does not meet the buildable square footage requirements for a parcel in a particular zoning district; or 2. A legally nonconforming dwelling with respect to setbacks, height and size which otherwise could not be expanded or reconstructed; or 3. A duplex constructed prior to March 31, 2003, that does not meet the minimum parcel size, which could not otherwise be reconstructed. C. Yard setback requirements where the deviation is for 10 percent or less of the required yard. D. Building height requirements where the deviation is for 25 percent or less of the maximum building height. Additional building height may be granted to the equivalent height of adjacent building in areas where the maximum building height is generally exceeded. Existing code provisions: Spilka a1COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTNGD: -1.AN rvriw E. Minimum lot area requirements where the deviation is for 25 percent or less of the required lot area. F. Maximum building coverage requirements where the deviation is for 25 percent or less of the maximum building coverage. G. Lot width under the following circumstances: 1 . Lot width requirements where the deviation is for 10 percent or less than the required lot width. 2. Lot width requirements where the deviation is greater than 10 percent; provided, that the department may require notice to affected agencies resulting in conditions of approval. H. Up to one half of a private tower's impact area off of the applicant's property 'p leant COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTPMN_ NG Drv1sIoN ,��1a1 lir H. Up to one half of a private tower's impact area off of the applicant's property I. Flanking street yard setbacks; provided that: 1 . At the time the subject parcel was legally created the property was zoned under a zoning classification of the pre-January 1, 1991, Spokane County zoning ordinance, and subsequently on January 1, 1991, a new zoning classification from the zoning code of Spokane County, Washington, was assigned to the subject property; and 2. Any flanking yard setback deviation granted under this section shall not exceed the required flanking street setback standards of the pre-January 1, 1991, zoning classification of the subject property. J. Any improved property rendered nonconforming through voluntary dedication of right-of-way, the exercise of eminent domain proceedings or purchase of right-of-way by the City, county, state or federal agency. sp°k� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _'P NIXING Divrsiory j dal ley Proposed code provisions: WIPVIWWIPPINENNwl Spilka COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT MANNING Divrsiory -- A.Yard setback requirements where the deviation is for 10 percent or less of the required yard. B . Minimum lot area requirements where the deviation is for 10 percent or less of the required lot area. C. Lot width or depth where the deviation is for 10 percent or less of the required lot width or depth. Spilka " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT aP NIXING Divrsiory j dal ley Existing code provisions: Spokane � DIVrsIo1V .- J COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT �1.A : N NG 19.140.020 Approval criteria Existing code provisions: Criteria for approval or denial of applications shall be established by the director if it is shown that: A. The administrative exception does not detract from the character and nature of the vicinity in which it is proposed. B. The administrative exception enhances or protects the character of the neighborhood or vicinity by protecting natural features, historic sites, open space, or other resources. C. The administrative exception does not interfere with or negatively impact the operations of existing land uses and all legally permitted uses within the zoning designation it occupies. D. Granting the administrative exception does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and welfare within the City. Spoka nc �, `d„ . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT !�: -MN NG Drv1sION D. The exception shall not apply to a series of parcels; for example, it should not be used to reduce size or frontage of a series of lots to create another lot; E. The administrative exception shall not be used to increase density beyond what is currently allowed within the zoning district; F. The exception shall not be contrary to conditions imposed by any other associated land use action, for example, a Hearing Examiner Decision, or conditions associated with the applicable short plat approval; G. The exception shall not conflict with other local, state, or federal laws. H. Granting the administrative exception does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and welfare within the City. sp°k� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _'P NIXING Divrsiory j dal ley Proposed code provisions: Spilka ne COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PIAN NG Drv1sION ,��1a1 lir 19.140.020 Approval criteria The Director shall approve or deny the application based on the following criteria: A. The administrative exception does not detract from the character of the vicinity in which it is proposed. B. The administrative exception enhances or protects the character of the neighborhood or vicinity by protecting natural features, historic sites, open space, or other resources. C. The administrative exception does not interfere with or negatively impact the operations of existing land uses and all legally permitted uses within the zoning designation it occupies. D. The exception shall not apply to a series of parcels; for example, it shall not be used to reduce size or frontage of a series of lots to create another lot; Spoka nc �, `d„ . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : !m NG Drvrsiow E. The administrative exception shall not be used to increase density beyond what is currently allowed within the zoning district. F. The exception shall not be contrary to conditions imposed by any other associated land use action, for example, a Hearing Examiner Decision, or conditions associated with the applicable short plat approval; G. The exception shall not conflict with other local, state or federal laws; and D. Granting the administrative exception does not constitute a threat to the public health, safety and welfare within the City. Spilka " COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT aP NIXING Divrsiory j dal ley Existing code provisions: Spoka ncm�, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT : ! N NG Drv1sION Residential accessory uses and structures Chapter 19.40.090 A. Except for the air conditioning compressors of detached single-family residential, cooling towers and similar accessory structures are required to observe all front, side or rear yards. B. The combined building footprint of all accessory structures in residential zoning districts shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area. sp°k� COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT _'P NIXING Divrsiory j dal ley Proposed code provisions: Spoka nc � �, `d„ . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT :M -aMN NG Drv1sION A. Cooling towers and similar accessory structures are required to observe all front, side or rear yards. B. The combined building footprint of all accessory structures in residential zoning districts are permitted as follows: 1 . Lots equal to, or less than, 10,000 sq. ft. in size may have up to 1 ,000 square feet of accessory structure(s) 2. Lots greater than 10,000 square feet in size may have accessory structure(s) that shall not exceed 10 percent of lot size. Spilka COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4 AN1 ING DrvisI N �i 1�a1 lir �. � Questions ? sijoka ne Community and Economic Valle x Development Department 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 Community of Opportunity 509.720.5310 ♦ Fax: 509.688.0037 ♦ planning®spokanevalley.org MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane Valley Planning Commission FROM: Lori Barlow, Senior Planner DATE: May 14, 2015 RE: Citizen-Initiated Amendment Requests - Staff Analysis Introduction: The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. On January 6, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council approved a Public Participation Program (PPP)outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprehensive Plan update process. As indicated in the PPP, all citizens, neighborhood organizations, or others were encouraged to submit an application to propose changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, zoning map, or development regulations. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (CARs). Action to be considered: Planning Commission shall review the CARs that were received and ultimately shall forward a recommendation to City Council identifying which CARs should be included as part of the Comprehensive Plan update analysis. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Include the CAR(s) in the Comprehensive Plan update analysis; or • Defer the CAR(s)to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140; or • Exclude the CAR(s) from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update process. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed CARs. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. The Planning Commission will consider the requests ata public hearing on May 14, 2015. Discussion: The CAR application period commenced on January 28, 2015 with an announcement at the public visioning meeting as well as notice published on the City website. In order to be considered for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, CARs had to be filed no later than March 31, 2015. A total of 26 CAR applications were received by the deadline. Each CAR application has been reviewed for possible Planning Commission Meeting May 14,2015-CAR Review Page 1 Valley Community of Opportunity inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update work program and the staff analysis of each application is contained in this Packet. The City has identified several specific focus areas that will be part of the overall Comprehensive Plan update process. These include: a. Mineral resource lands b. Multi-family zones c. Office zones d. Industrial zones The Planning Commission should strongly consider including applications that are categorized in one of the focus areas listed above, as the City has identified these topics as necessary to analyze in the update process. An additional consideration for the Planning Commission in review of the CAR applications is the incorporation of the public input themes identified in the Community Vision Report and developed through the public meetings between January and March 2015. The themes are broken down into topical area and are as follows: Community Character: • Focus on the area near the proposed new city hall • Leverage community trails to improve community character • Increased sense of community identity • Increased focus on parks Economic Opportunity: • Desire to create special places in the community • Opportunities exist around public facilities • Maintain fiscal responsibility • Focus on the importance of existing local commercial and industrial areas • Leverage community assets • Concern over external forces and Code Enforcement Housing: • Housing affordability • More and better amenities • Housing for seniors • Preservation of neighborhood character • Evaluate different housing types as an option to single-family residential Transportation: • Level of Service policy works well • Improve freight movement and safety • Focus on maintenance and technology • Invest in streetscape and Community Character • Improve connections and safety for other modes of travel The themes developed from the public input provide additional information regarding the desires of the community and should inform the Planning Commission's determination on which CARs should be included in the Comprehensive Plan update process. Planning Commission Meeting May 14,2015—CAR Review Page 2 Valley Community of Opportunity Requests Submitted: The applications and options for consideration by the Planning Commission are included as Attachments 1-26. [Editor's Note: the structure of the document can be modified to fit City's needs and preferences.] Next Steps: Following a recommendation by the Planning Commission, the City Council is anticipated to make a decision on which CARs will be included (and therefore studied further) as part of the Comprehensive Plan update on June 9, 2015. Once the City Council has decided which CAR applications to include in the Comprehensive Plan update process, each application will be reviewed for approval based on the criteria listed below. The proposal must meet one or more of the established approval criteria, as stated in the application form. The criteria include: a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. While reviewing these CAR applications, the following factors will also be considered in making a recommendation for approval or denial: a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Planning Commission Meeting May 14,2015—CAR Review Page 3 Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Edward Payne APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0001 PROPERTY OWNER: Argonne Forest LLC 4 SITE ADDRESS: 1618 N. Sargent Rd PARCEL No.: 45074.0905 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Office (0) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Multifamily Residential (HDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: Garden Office (GO) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-2, Multifamily High Density Residential (MF-2) Summary of Request: The proposal submitted for 1618 N. Sargent Road is to change the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from 0 to HDR, resulting in a rezone from GO to MF-2. Context: Parcel No. 45074.0905 (1618 N. Sargent Rd)is 12,000 square feet in area (.27 acres). The parcel is currently vacant. The land use designations of the adjacent parcels include 0 to the immediate north, east and south. The land use designations of the parcels to the west (across N. Sargent Road) are LDR. Single family residences currently exist on the north, south and west of the subject property. An existing parking lot for an office building is located on the east of the property. Sargent Road, which is designated as a local access street, is located on the west and provides access to the site. Implications: The GO zone is intended for low-rise office development with limited retail or commercial uses. These uses provide a buffer between residential uses and commercial uses. Primary uses include medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financial institutions, design firms and legal services. The MF-2 zone allows for different housing types and can accommodate densities up to 22 units per acre. Generally, this provides a transition between higher intensity land uses, such as commercial and office, to medium and lower density single-family neighborhoods. A rezone of the parcel to MF-2 would allow residential uses in addition to those uses allowed in the GO zone, result in a height increase of five feet, and reductions in front and side yard setbacks. CAR-2015-0001.—Staff Analysis Page 1 A general comparison of the development standards applicable to each zone is as follows: GO and MF-2 Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage GO 45 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. N/A 20 ft. 20 ft. MF-2 50 ft. 65% 20 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the specific focus area of Multifamily zones identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the public input themes of Housing identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if Multifamily High Density Residential (MF-2) is an appropriate designation for this parcel. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of Multifamily High Density Residential District (MF-2)zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less MF- 2 zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if MF-2 is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property D. Photos E. Application Materials CAR-2015-0001—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map I90 /4281ON 190 190 190 E257 OFF ror Study Area Mission t I CAR 15-001 Request: Spolane Applicant: Edward Payne Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to 1l Icy Parcel#: 45074.0905 HDR;subsequent Rezone from GO to MF-2 Address: 1618 N Sargent Rd Zoning Map IgOW2g7 04 i3O Igo 190 E287 OFF rr • Study Area 0 Mission t I CAR 15-001 Request: Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to SpoAhcant: Edward Payne e HDR;subsequent Rezone from GO to MF-2Parcel#: 45074.0905 Address: 1618 N Sargent Rd - 4 '',61.r-941` _ 4.1 AP IN 4091 "x -'c 09I 90 E2S1 OFF 41 01 1151' -- UIII1 „� 4- N 1. •-r-' . 1f' 410. ,. - _ . y Study Area , i . Pr. _ gal IN ,.. 1: • f .2-**'- .- . u 1 / y _ r I i, .i iii r -101, 11 CAR 15-001 Request: Applicant: Edward Payne Change the Comprehensive Plan map from 0 to Spokane Parcel#: 45074.0905 HDR;subsequent Rezone from GO to MF-2 4.00.Valley' Address: 1618 N Sargent Rd z -:ASS, ..4 ,v - oil. h� Wjf �� •!. ,,,...„,1/4.7,...:; a • f • _ 5 —yTi } S r- a L F r L ',:r: _ i g x ') i _. . F• . A T! Y ti y " �I" - -' 1 " Looking East onto site Looking North n6. .., t _ r f T � .y s j } +!* ','.1 r k ' r' v.. .'" .. 4,°1.` ." 4,kl { .. p Y Y R 4 c• y y 1 - F S 1+. 1 , z +'. 1 ' + 'tit a ..c •3 N. N:' _4 '�:' �. 'iLY. .,lRLi i.. Looking West Looking East 1 5 7.44-,-5;. 'f 1r A.w{--,vo.1L 1 M : f 3 ;1 rF f"f 3 ,a , - w� 4 5 f ASF. F . .i.1:1. Vii."`'d''''.)'4 ` y - IN i • - 1 a •. r , Looking South L.!'o ; . 1.1' r. ' n t, e4 to — . , ' - - - •• . ir, •'' .. . ,......' :I •.:.411,r- --, ' ,:e4iiiii,/.._:;----.7,1--.1 -1-74-1-,',.;;77_,-_-!--.-',..,'-',J. • - ir.,--,;.--- . - . .. ..--,%.,, ,,„,.. n. • % • 5 r}a r '.1 • • I 1 s iiii;i4i14' . ' 1 . I {:�y�4i �r Irl p,,r •� .t r' ti;11F17 : ; • �4} , a'. yW i j v 49-7 4h ... Looking South *wanekms_ ley. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Car+itrrtrrrrty q/'f pperrtarrratp f' G 4 -op PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION , 'Map amendment; or 7 Text amendment • APPLICANT!Uric: ji€ jek$r L+L 1 ` J tj" t MAILING ADDRESS: �j fierj.r4l ''44 CrTY: 10 it` , STATE: ZIP: e Li-4,1)(11 PHONE: 5-07- 'Y FAX:. 9-get 7P41 CELL: f ' EMAIL:Qa*ill/ey)67)eSr.- rt.-'-'4'- , PROPERTY OWNER: -A 6 iS k For r i4' - 7' MAILING ADDRESS: 4). A f f�0Pt` CITY, kt A...e_ STATE: ZIP: 99 P5lowE .cLacrt3 & 'I FAX: 5---e9-83. 2‘f 2 CEa:SW- EMAIL/10ot 4t- viar ]' , I r,,,� +l SITE ADDRESS: f .fV •a.# 1 PARCEL NO.: >V . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DE$IGNATIDN- PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: 3 I PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: F - BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): �e.r . f +. -- 1. ` c _.qtr 1:)*:;!'-1,,,-6_,...-0,71.4 ' 06,4..... -,6-t_"...4, ..276.-- Olt+ .71.A-a,C 6P--,,,,-- - - J_ f - ,ice -- PL-d8 V1,0 PAgo 4 of 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE �� CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION 07111111H0 1 f. rrf Opportunity rfy PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I. (0-cc1\y 4 T H (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knatiuledge. (Signature) (Date) PL-013V1.0 Page al CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT CITYKa Oro REQUEST APPLICATION Community Development— Planning Division (nfrilatr#d+ff4' { PI'Fiartlty 117107 E Sprague Ave Suite i 6 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5310* Fax: 509.688,0037 ! planning@5pokaneveLtey,org COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST The Washington Slate Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. On January 6, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council approved a PuLthc Participation Program (PPP) outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprehensive Plan update process. As indicated in the PPP, all citizens, neighborhood organizations, or others may submit an application to propose changes to the Comprehensive flan, land use map, zoning map, or development regulations. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (CARS) and will be evaluated for consideration by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. In order to be considered for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, GARS shall be hied no later than March 31, 2015. Complete CAR applications will be reviewed for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update work program, and will be processed based upon established criteria as well as the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the proposal. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: + Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or * Defer the CAR(s)to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17 BD 14D: or • Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process, PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. The application period will commence at the first Comprehensive Plan update public meeting on January 23, 2015 and will close on March 31, 2015_ Submittals received after the deadline shall not be considered. 2. initial Review. Following the closing of the application period, the City shall review each application to determine whether to include the proposal in the Comprehensive Plan update work program. Staff shall review each application and prepare a report to the Planning Commission, which wit make a recommendation to .he City Council. The City Council shall consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and make a decision cm which applications to include in the Comprehensive Plan update work program in May 2015 Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: I Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; cm • Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.8c.14Ci. or • Deny the 4R(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Flan update process. The application(s), if included in the work program, shall be consolidated with the City's Comprehensive Plan update work program and will be sub;ect to Steps 3 through 7 as stated below. 3. Staff Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report shall analyze whether each proposal included in the work program meets the amendment criteria included in this application and, if so, how it meets those criteria_ All application documents and staff reports shall be available for public review. 4. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively, The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, Including findings on each individual proposed amendment. nets Page 1 of 5 Spokane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION f"nnurrrrrn?yof C orhun ty 5. City Council Review and Recision. The City Council shall review the Planning Commission's recommendation and will then adopt the recommendation or amend it, 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management F-learings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, pursuant to RDA/36.70A.291:1(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Lori Barlow, Senior Planner (Lbeilowaa spokanevalley erq). PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE PLANNING DIVISION SHALL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED" A. For map amendments: "E Completed Application Form 171 SEPA Checklist: One copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including optional Non-Project Action supplemental form_ (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project sboadd be included arid may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Iiearing packet for 400-foot rlotlfication. (Please note: Do not submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City_ Addresses shell be current within 30 gays of the Planning Commission public hearing) r] One copy of a narrative describing the following: t State the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below: a_ The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error: or e. The proposed amendment addresses en identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. . Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; 1. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density irr the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. PLEB VtO lege 2 Of 5 j oki e Valley. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZN•INITIATEU AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community'f OppoMmity B. Submit the Following for text amendments to the comprehensive Plan or development regulations: U Completed Application Form ▪ One copy of the tent proposed to be changed,showing deletions by st gb and additions by underline. LI One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and We potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the pub& health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment, P. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of ROW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive {pian; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control appl cable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date SubmittedReceived by: tccry A' ' ' Fee: PLUS #: File#: ( z1 f PL-4R V1.0 Page 3 Of 5 Narrative Addressin, Com Plan &1 CW 36.70A coin Ranee 1. The reason for the change is to down zone a single lot zoned GO to a more compatible MF-2. 2. a. This down zone will reduce unwelcotned daytime auto traffic from an office use in this residential neighborhood. I), An infill lot in an almost fully developed neighborhood that is served with all utilities as well as being on a paved street addresses several requirements of RCW 36.70A. It would modestly increase affordable housing in the contiguous residential neighborhood. c, NIA d. N/A e. N/A Our proposal addresses the following goals and policies o[the comprehensive plan; Approval criteria support under L P.1.1 & LUP_1.2 - The proposed use protects the character of this existing residential neighborhood from the activities of an office building on this lot. Because this is a vacant lot, improving it for residential uses will help to protect the existing residential single family development from the existing adjacent nonresidential uses of the $ lots that face each other across N. Sargent Ave in this block. 7 are single family homes and the $ih is the subject vacant lot. 3. a_ N/A b. N/A c. This change in use is a compatible way for the use on this lot to lit in with the other 7 lots facing Sargent Rd in this block and the broader neighborhood. d„ The change in use has little impact on facilities serving this neighborhood. Ail required improvements and utilities are existing. c. The benefit of infill is wellrecognized when it is as compatible as in this case. f. This is a single lot of 12,000 square feet and is located between 2 single family dwellings. Currently there is a strong demand for residential land in the City of Spokane Valley. g. N/A h. This action will have little effect on the other aspects of the comprehensive plan. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Howard Herman APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0002 PROPERTY OWNER: Howard Herman SITE ADDRESS: 115 & 117 N. McDonald Rd PARCEL No.: 45153.4126; 45153.4127 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Corridor Mixed-Use (CMU) ZONING DESIGNATION: R-3, Single-Family Residential (R-3) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: CMU, Corridor Mixed-Use District (CMU) Summary of Request: The proposal submitted for 115 and 117 N. McDonald Road is to change the Land Use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from LDR to CMU, resulting in a re-zone from R-3,to CMU. Context: Parcel 45153.4126 (115 N. McDonald Road)is 14,457 square feet in area (0.33 acres)and parcel 45153.4127 (117 N. McDonald Road) is 18,563 square feet in area (0.43 acres). The two parcels together total approximately 33,020 square feet (0.76 acres). Both parcels are developed with single- family homes. Surrounding parcels include LDR to the immediate west, north (across E. Main Avenue), and east (across N. McDonald Road). A mix of low and high density residential is situated along McDonald Road, extending north from the property. The adjacent parcels to the south are CMU. The Sprague Avenue/Appleway Avenue corridor runs the entire length of the City of Spokane Valley from west to east. Commercial zoning extends one block north of Sprague Avenue to Main Avenue along most of the corridor. This property is an exception with residential development having occurred west, north and east of the site. Sprague Avenue is located 400 feet south of the site and is a principal arterial. Principal arterials serve the major centers of activity and include the highest volumes of traffic. The parcels lie along McDonald Road which is identified as a Minor Arterial in the City's Arterial Street Plan. Minor arterials accommodate trips of moderate length at a lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. They may carry local bus routes and provide intra-community continuity, but ideally they do not penetrate neighborhoods. Implications: A re-zone of both parcels to CMU would allow a broader range of uses, including commercial, higher density residential, light industrial, retail, and office, among others. Since the parcels are currently developed with single-family homes, any change in designation to these parcels would have implications for future redevelopment. The surrounding residential uses could be impacted by the transition to CMU zoning. Impacts may include higher building heights and greater lot building coverage. Buildings setbacks, screening, and landscaping would likely mitigate some of the impacts caused by commercial uses on the subject parcels. Traffic impacts in the vicinity are pre-existing due to the site's proximity to Sprague Avenue and McDonald Road. The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones. CAR-2015-0002—Staff Analysis Page 1 R-3 and CMU Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage R-3 35 ft. 50% 65 ft. 90 ft. 15 ft. 20 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. CMU 50 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. N/A Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application does not appear to align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application does not appear to align with the public input themes identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if CMU is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of CMU zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less CMU zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if CMU is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property CAR-2015-0002—Staff Analysis Page 2 i 1 I . - .' "IMINIIIO'- Y ;� r-111M t ll 0 Ur- I P. ta., I filik, 1 1110 lit * � n J 3ii; i Study Area 1 4 ill Plii 4 i.,,‘ , iiikr _ 1 I , .., . II 11161 W - • I ILISR: i = . 1 1 • 1 ._ r I. A 4* ., ?9 . - s , , m . ... ... 4 4 , , . . , ..,I En , e k. ..,, ..... ,..., . _ . - .y ... = _ - _., Ii WE I I I 1 I `-; J CAR 15-002 Request: Applicant: Howard Herman Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45153.4126, .4127 CMU;subsequent Rezone from R-3 to CMU jural ley Address: 115/117 NMcDonald Rd Comprehensive Plan Map t L. , 1- , Study Area / 1 CAR 15-002 Request: Applicant: Howard Herman Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to pd kain� Parcel#: 45153.4126, .4127 CMU;subsequent Rezone from R-3 to CMU 40010° '' Address: 115/117 N McDonald Rd Zoning Map ,=777 ÷777 7777 =7777777L -777777L77777 -= "" 7 7777 ÷77777777 • :::77 777777 . -=' -. -==- = - - - ----- Study Are . \1 - -7 .. .. .. .......,...„........,...............................N..........................„N.,.......................\AN\.,, 1 CAR 15-002 Request: Applicant: Howard Herman Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45153.4126, .4127 CMU;subsequent Rezone from R-3 to CMU j\alley Address: 115/117 N McDonald Rd 1 , . . .. . . . ' -...'.. • N... . _ , •. ..- • - -7.- -'''....- ' '''' __ -- . . . • . " ;--7"--"------;z7-1.---- -_15 --'-f-2.;:- __. - =_•-_..;:•,.._-_-.,.. - -,. ...' ;41, • .il. • ' ., . _. „ '.- • : '....,,I.. - - ..-,.---- - --- ---- • .—._----_-7.7.-.-----_-"r-7-- - .t. _ • ' S.•"1 - ...1 . it- _ - .. . . 1. _ . t . 1 ..- 1 . ; -,i, , .„ .... • , _ _...„...„ •,,, . , _. - ....„,,.. . _ ,,.. . r. _ ....._ _ _. . . i' 1:-.;) 111 • -- ..,,,- -- - • ' --"`• P;-•:' ''i " W' - '.- 4'0:::. ' -.'"."- 1,.• ,''' • I ..-• . _ - '-'''- '164,•r- ' "7" ' - 4 ''.'•*'." 1.''"- k . :..:4' .7 "'-''' -`1, '-‘,_••-- .7!"4 ., ,-." ::•,- %. 7,i-, .'•-•:- . --g.- .. 1..--.1' ,,r; ,:.,-' .-7.2;_;. .-;*!.'.13,'':-'"-g ,44-g'14-.1.r...c.,...i...-.1------ L- ,. -,.r7i..," g:•-',,. • . . . , ,.. • ,pe,..,ir,_fi,r.r.;.-•-- P''4'!''.'.,1",4•Z"hPi".,'"'4r".',Pri,"-,'''..1''..-.1,"....''.,...''"";'-''$-'';;P..".,'7''.:,0.-.'.?C.7:•'-'-•‘P-i--,l..'.l'.;'i''.w Looking East ^1f.-i'gel.jPs.r.igle.rf.,'i;.,.',1...,1.•P'••• ..,_ _kr.:r..,.P, '-. '-'- - ---1 -.P•'-'i• . P'P-•P•PP...P.'P.•.'.'-P -P"-'‘. i.,--i-§4;.' :-,,, '. ,-i -,..-'..;'4'_l_v-F-14.-. '_.:...•:-47,;,,.P":".'''• .'•eL-'-.0..,Ps..-P.:- Looking SW onto site --., r- 111/- _ . . _ . .0.. -.; , :--..-.••_ . • %. .,,,. .r . ..... -_tci, 1 1 " • ••• .. i - ..--,,,,,' , • . - . ---; -------- w:- -. E.,. i- 1....• ' ..,,:,-,-,,_ •,:rt.•r. ..i. II.P. II. . . , +.' • ,- °A • -..-........... . gi .. . ' , } "--'!•:."....... ... _ . - 1 - MO •-•"--4 - , ' - --- -Ft.) ''l t_ 11111 _....-,-"--• — ',:b - .--, . .. . . %. '; • ' 1.- -,.....- • , • —- - . - . _ . .. - . ..... .. - . . . ....., - - .ti410., 4::..„'-zi,:*i.._....-.:.'-f:it-.•I . - _ . ... 1 . . - L Looking West , , .. Looking North onto site n _ . _ _ - _ —fes s--- Mil f • 6 f I ,F _ • .. yyr - - - - . an j4 .� I A -r ■ i L fir'_" " _-_ f _. .. LL.t ._.gr - IL r Looking SW onto site Looking North -- - { e.N�,� - , az.,..F., it •1 . L-.14-1 - ``' 7 � r�---r i. p . • • — r ., - - p.r ,� ;72A:4-•.:-' ., �• Com. . ~, Looking South onto site Looking South • i ;` �` `. f. ar Looking South k e .000%H COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE " CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENTBEQUEST-APPLICATLD Co inrmaty of Oppa unity PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION 421/1. -- X Map amendment; or 0 Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: Howard Herman MAILihro ADDRESS; 117 N McDonald Rd CITY: Spokane Valley STATE:WA ZIP:99216 , CELL: EMAIL: PHONE: 509.220.5810 FAX:none 509.2204810 hhherman2 carncast ne PROPERTY OWNER: Howard Herman MAILING ADDRESS: 117 N McDonald Rd Cm': Spokane Valley STATE:WA ZIP:99216 CELL: EMAIL: PHONE:509.22D,5813 FAx: none 509,220.5810 hhherman2@comcast.net PARCEL NC6 45153.410& SITE ADDRESO&117 N rvioDdiald Rd 46153.4127 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Der°sity Residential PROPOSE❑COMPREHENSkVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Corridor Mixed Use ZONING t3ES:GNATION_ R-3 IPROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: CMU BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP CR TEXT AMENDMENT{attach full explanation on separate sheet df paper: The plan charge is requested to allow economic development on the property. CSV C)Uurs90pii]:fl 1,n)ireerui MAR 20 20th I,icirt —.. t'Wtlrfle PL-48 V1,0 Page 5 of "alian .000 Valley- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION C'awmiutth PiOpparfmrkr PART II! - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, Howard 1-lermarr, (prink name) swear or affirm that the above re$ponsos are made truthfully and to the bait of my�k crwledge. I/ W . ' 'e:',2_,, March 5, 2015 (Signature) (Date) PI-4i VII.Q Page 5 of 5 CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT S",} REQUEST APPLICATION Community Development— Planning Division 117071; Sprague Ave Suite 106 4 Spokane Vatley WA 99206 ':'ra�ar�ru�slryofO orta,rrily 509.720.5310$ Fax; 509.688,0037 4 planntngc spokaneva,tey.org COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST The Washington State Growth Management Act GMA requires the City to periodically review orad update- its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations On January 6, 2016, the Spokane Valley City Council approuert a Public Participation Program (PPP)outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprehensive Plan update process. AS indicated in the PPP, all citizens neighborhood organizations, or others may submit en application to propose changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, zoning mep, or development regulations. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (GARS) and will be evaluated for consideration by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. In order to be considered For inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, CARs shall be filed no later than March 31, 2015. Complete CAR applications will be reviewed for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update work program, and will be processed based upon established criteria as well as the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the prooesel. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or • Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17 $0.140; or • Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. The appiicatlon period will commence at the first Comprehensive Plan Update public meeting on January 28. 2015 and will close on March 81, 2015 Submittals received after the deadline shall not be considered. 2. Initial Review. Following the closing of the application period, the City shall review each application to determine whether to include the proposal in the Comprehensive Plan update work program, Staff shall review each application and prepare a report to the Planning Commission, which will make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and make a decision on which applications to include in the Comprehensive Plan update work program in May 20Th. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under tree GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CARO) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or • Defer the CAR(s}to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140; Di • Deny the CAR(s) from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process, The epplication(s), it included in the work program, shall be consolidated with the City's Comprehensive Plan update work program and will be subject to Steps 3 through 7 as stated below. 3. Staff Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane V2lIey Planning Commission. The report shall analyze whether each proposal included in the work program meets the amendment criteria included in this application and, if so, how it meets those criteria, All application documents and staff reports shall be available for public review. 4. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively_ The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. PL-40V1.0 Page 1 at pikane COIflPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Comm-Junky of Opportunity 5. City Council Review and Decision. The City Council shall review the Planning Commission's recommendation and will then adopt the recommendation. or amend it, 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 00 days of pubrication of notice of adoption, pursuant to RCW 36.70A.290t2j. 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Lori Barlow, Senior Planner (Lbarlow sookanevallev.orcl). PART I — REQUIRED MATERIAL 'THE PLANNING DIViSiON SHAH FOOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REOUIREb MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED" A,. For map amendments: EtCompleted Application Form N SEBA Checklist: One copy of completed,S ate Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Environmental Checklist, Indo Ing optional Non-Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental damn-ents that are relevant to This project should be lritttrdad and may be adopted by reference,) 0 Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification. (Please note: Do not submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses sfra!t be current within 30 days of the Planning Conmissfon public hearing.) ❑ One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment, Answer: To allow economic development in an area that is currently zoned R-3 and designated on the Comp Plan map as Low Density Residential, 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below: a The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; Answer: The property faces McDonald Rd which according to the City% 2012 vehicle count is 7100 vehicles There ere two residences on the property. Each one has a cab cut far ingress and egress. There are right and left hand turns off McDonald into the respective driveways, There is also a mail truck stop between the curb cuts.These to ins impede traffic as does the mail truck stop Backing nut of the driveways is particularly dangerous. Emergency vehicles use McDonald Rd going to and from the hospital on Mission, Changing the use of the property from residential to business would improve safety and the traffic flaw by removing the curb cuts and the mail truck stop and limiting ingress and egress to the property from Riverside Avenue on the South and Main Avenue on the North. A smooth traffic flow would also reduce emissions. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of IDA/36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; Answer: The GMA and the Cornp Plan both favor economic development, and the provision of more services to the community, neighborhood and region. C. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change In conditions beyond the property owners control applicable to the area within whack the subject property lies- Answer: This property hos been in the family since 1947. Originally this was an agricultural community with a narrow gravel road serving the property. There were six other homes en McDonald between Sprague and Mission, and twenty to thirty vehicle trips and busy day. Now we have businesses on North McDonald, sidewalks with pedestrian traffic and four paved lanes with and thousands of vehicles daily. d. The proposed amendment corrects art obvious mapping error; or Answer: NA PL-48 V1.4 Paget 2 pF 0 Sfithane .00-Valley COMPREWEHISCVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Coimurrono,q. OppprfNit ry e. The proposed amendment addresses an :dentifled deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Answer: NA 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a. The effect upon the physical environment; Answer: There are presently two homes and a shop on the property, They would be replaced by one modern structure_ b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; Answer.There are no open spaces, streams, rivers, and lakes In the area. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; Answer: The property Is on the Southern-most edge of middle to low income housing, some Fairly new but mostly alder_ The property is separated from CMU zoning on the South by a narrow unmaintained road. (Riverside) Only one law income residential property to the West is adjacent to the property.. The other three sides are bordered by Riverside,. Main and McDonald. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; Answer: All community facilities are adequate and will not be impacted. e. The benefit to the rleighborl cod, city and region; Answer: The property is strategically located close to neighborhood, city and regional roads. Successful economic development on the property will increase employment. services. tax revenues and provide new services to the neighborhood, city and region. f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type end density, and the demand for such land; Answer: The lot size is 33000 + square feet and is located near the intersection of Sprague and McDonald Rd. The land use proposes is CMU. There is a pimpled amount of land available for such zoning. The City is planning to change McDonald to two lanes and a turning lane which will make access to the land even better, g, The current and projected population density in the area; Answer:This residential neighborhood is fully built out with the exception of a lot.outh of Riverside which is zoned CMU and a similar let opposite an the East site of McDonald, h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Answer: This minor change in the map should have no effect on the Comprehensive Plan except to further the economic development goal. PL-48 V1.0 Page 3)f 5 .000"Valley C 7MP EHEh1SIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REOIL'EST APPLICATION CIVaMMrty of[,peal uiiey IR. Submit the followFnig for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development regulations: Completed Application Form ® One copy of the text proposed to be changed,showing deletions by strikethrough and additions by underline, E] One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a sJbstantiel relationship to the public health, safety. welfare, and protection of the environment; b_ The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of ROW 36.7OAand with the City's adopted CornprohFnsive Plan: c. The proposed amendment responds tO a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies: d. The proposed amendment corrects en obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an Fdentifiied deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: _Received by: Fee: PLUS #: File : FL-413VI,) Page4of6 Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Triple Creek Investments APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0003 PROPERTY OWNER:Triple Creek Investments SITE ADDRESS: 16608 E. Broadway Avenue PARCEL No.: 45134.0317 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential (HDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential district (R-3) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: High Density Multifamily Residential district (MF-2) Summary of Request: The proposal submitted is a request to change the Land Use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from LDR to HDR resulting in a rezone from R-3 to MF-2. Context: The site is approximately 4.89 acres in size and is currently vacant. It is located east of Sullivan on Broadway and is approximately 650 feet south of 1-90. The property is surrounded on all sides by properties zoned R-3. The uses in the immediate vicinity of the property are primarily single family dwellings. However, properties zoned Regional Commercial, Community Commercial and MF-2 are located in the vicinity, which include existing big-box retail developments. The site is accessed from Broadway Avenue, a minor arterial and is located between Conklin Road, a collector, and Flora Road, a minor arterial. Implications: A rezone of the parcel to MF-2 would allow a broader range of uses, including higher density residential, (up to 22 units per acre) professional offices, medical and dental clinics, vet clinics, and self-storage facilities. Land use designations east of Sullivan on Broadway are varied and include Office, Community Commercial and Regional Commercial, zones which attract higher intensity commercial uses, the closest of which is 700 feet west of the site. Additionally, two parcels located approximately 1,600 feet west of the site are zoned MF-2 and are currently being developed with high density residential uses. Current development standards for the MF-2 zone ensure that impacts to the surrounding neighborhood are mitigated through the implementation of standards such as relational height standards and landscape buffering requirements, among others. A general comparison of the development standards applicable to each zone is as follows: CAR-2015-0003—Staff Analysis Page 1 MF-2 and R-3 Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front/ Rear Yard Side Garage Flanking Yard Yard MF-2 50 ft. 65% N/A N/A 15 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. R-3 35 ft. 50% 65 ft. 90 ft. 15 ft. 20 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. Focus areas and public input themes: The application appears to align with the multifamily focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan update process. The application appears to align with the housing public input themes identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if HDR is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of HDR zoned parcels including identification of the need for more or less HDR zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if HDR is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential rezone area to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property D. Photos E. Application Material CAR-2015-0003—Staff Analysis Page 2 ion _ _____ _ ., +! ■ yam. i1: �`Tei .. y ,k "'1 •• 1� o 111 I Study Area an a ir - i Allisci4 _ Laill pY i - 1 ' I e r=' 1F 1 I . 4 ! - _ Lk I ' _ .1 _ .. _ 11 I ii CAR 15-003 Request: Applicant: Triple Creek Investments Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45134.0317 HDR;subsequent Rezone from R-3 to MF-2 .....Valley Address: 16608 E Broadway Comprehensive Plan Map 190 Ah Broadway Study Area 10 0 0 L ( - a 0 0 b a 0 _ o 1 o CAR 15-003 Request: aneSpol Applicant: Triple Creek Investments Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to 4100 Valley. Parcel#: 45134.0317 HDR;subsequent Rezone from R-3 to MF-2 Address: 16608 E Broadway Ave Zoning Map 190 Broadway Study Area 0 00 Alki- a 0 0 _,,,,,b a 0 _ o x I \ I CAR 15-003 Request: ¢• Applicant: TripleChange the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to Spokane Creek Investments .000 Val Icy Parcel#: 45134.0317 HDR;subsequent Rezone from R-3 to MF-2 Address: 16608 E Broadway Ave • 11 - S K - t +3 • 4 + — r x o+` � �. { • +'1dti 'I. . p -err, _ i'R 'l . , r or -� - - -'''.7._...:,___,___ _____--. ——— _ - Looking SW onto site - Looking West s. • :! l9 / • • A S , • o 1 +� .. y w ' Looking East t Looking South onto site . .•- . . . . -- . ,. . ,•. , - 7.-.-•-• _._ A c. . :.•„', ' 7,...: .- -f : . --'% ,,, - , . . ,• - • _ - . . .. . . ' ' .!r.• : .. . ,• •.. .. • ' -r 101 - ' . •- - ,4--,'...e-".4 ,..., --s-„..-. .i... ,.1 ••,, -. , , ,7,-• • . I ..,,,•,,,•-• . ,a4.41., , ..T. .. ...1k- II 2_.'.: ':- -7."4- - .° :''' s . -- -, -..---. '? 7-:''' '5'4,'01 1.',.4, -.:r;•,,..-'1 V -., .• -- ' , --' --'' - -7--.4.1,'. •- = • . ' = . L.LSZ,Iii'4'.'11'.+,-ft'--,-a rat.,... .,,- ia,.:- .-y-„,,,... 4.,..,• .. ... • .. , ...:•.••._:•••:•••...•.•,,..•,,,,,•,-„,,..,,_:,•. 4 . •• iir',..,tr,,- .. ^ . A - _ __ ___ ri•-*;;;:,..,.*A;7.-• .7,-:-- '- . ... rh4,0,;„,,i7:-.i..:4,-,,•,',.. ..,-.772.-`;',,,?::-.;...• . . ',;tLooking at Southern property line . Looking NE ,_ _ • — 4 -a-- - . . 2 -, , . lig, -ir• ' N. . _ -. •- .. . . a....-1.1111111111pr: I ,.- •.• L. ..... - - , K•'.. ...„, .-- • ,Z111h... . . i . -,m 1". . . auk .7-. -1116100.41110111111011* .. - 1. , . .. - —------... - , Looking SE . • Looking North Looking siiimrane RECEIVED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE dolooValley. MAR i 9 ,CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Caonorrouly of Opporraanrry SP KOf-115 -0903! pAi 11._ AppLicAtioN INFORMATION Map amendment; artGot El Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: (RI+ i,f; le" T`. / V E QTc 1�-' �- � Ll C. MAILING ADDRESS: 19 CITY: ,r{,1 f1rl... STATE: i'w„� ZIP: (�U T r i y ra a�s'� S .S PHoNE: 43 - 2.5 FAX: 7• /i L. CELL: EMAIL: %-P c PROPERTY OWNER: i ` loll t-'l is--s c MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL; EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: 'te,6906 'LZ, .,I'P'LJ'"'Ay ',PARCEL NO.: 4 5-11 4: U COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION; VI, F - a BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper}: I - '5, ` f l J Zir, VZ._ VR. Al C- re _ PL-48 V1.4 Page 4 of 6 n€timne _ .00 Lp COINPREHENSJVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION ConontunFry ofOpporiarriiy PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant)1.40 sr- I�-,,r Ir { (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to e best of my knowledge, 4 l (Signature) (D te} FL-4Bvto Page 5of6 Spokane Valley Citizen-initiated Amendment Request March 12, 2015 Narrative 1. Reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment: The property at 16608 Broadway Avenue is a vacant parcel zoned R-3 which specifies a maximum density of 7,500 SF for single family and 12,000 SF for a duplex lot. The property is less than ROO feet from the Kohl's shopping center heading west along Broadway. The Kohl's center is adjacent to the ' Valmart Supercenter and the Ross and Toys "R" Us stores. The commercial retail then turns onto N Sullivan Rd. and continues south to Sprague Avenue,which is the main commercial east/west corridor. Across Broadway Avenue from the Kohl's and Walmart retail stores is a high-density multi-family project. To the east of this, the zone radically changes to the much lower density of R-3, consisting of single-family homes and duplexes. It is the applicant's opinion that the zone for 16608 Broadway Ave. should be more of a transition zone, in between the low- density single family and duplex units of R-3 and that of the massive big box center with its high traffic volume a few feet away. For the purpose of long-range planning purposes, the residential densities should be concentrated near the large commercial hubs to discourage urban sprawl. Without the proper zoning, the natural growth that occurs over a 20 year period will be forced away in the outlying areas. The applicant recommends that the city rezones this property MF-2. 2. How the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria. 2a. The site located at 16608 Broadway is a five acre lot located less than 800 feet from the Kohl's and other large car-based shopping centers. The low-density R-3 zone is not appropriate for such close proximity to such a large retail center. The MF-2 zone will help discourage urban sprawl by providing retail densities close to this urban area. 2b. The proposed amendment meets RCW 36.70A by increasing the residential densities around the urban corridor, leaving the outlying areas free for more open space. It also encourages pedestrian and bike travel to the urban area and reduces the chance for urban sprawl. 2c. The original zoning of R-3 occurred before such a large box retail center was located next door. 2d. The city development of the urban area has created an outdated zone in this area. Hundreds of thousands of square feet of retail space next to an R-3 zone is not compatible. A transitional zone is needed to separate the low-density R-3 zone from the big box retail stores. 2e. The proposed amendment addresses this lack of a transition zone. 3. How the proposal addresses the following specific factors. 3a. Rezoning this site to MF-2 will allow higher densities of residential to occur adjacent to the large retail center, which will help meet thecity's residential needs closer to the urban area. This will help reduce the need for urban sprawl. The site is also close enough to the large retail center for shoppers or employees of the center to walk, or ride bikes, thus reducing the carbon footprint of the region. 3b. The site iscurrently vacant and it is not being used for any purpose other than the city owned storm water facility, which will remain regardless.. The development of the site to the higher density will not have any affect on streams, rivers or lakes. 3c. As with any transitional zone, there will be periods where single family and duplex units may be adjacent to a higher densities of residential. However, if the city extends the transitional IMF-2 zone to the existing multi-family project a few parcels to the west, than eventually the highest and best use of the zone will be built. The implementation of a new MF-2 zone on 16608 Broadway will not have nearly the impact in traffic, light pollution or other environmental consideration of that of the massive retail center a few feet away. 3d. The existing road infrastructure should be adequate to accommodate the additional residential units planned for a MF-2 zone, however the applicant is prepared to do a site specific TIA if required by the city staff. The applicant will also work with staff to determine any site-specific impacts to utilities, community facilities, roads, parks, recreation and schools and adequately, mitigate them to city requirements. 3e. The benefit of the neighborhood is that the value of the land would increase with the higher zone. Also, the large retail centers employ many people, who might want to live in multi-family units. This site is close enough to walk, or ride bikes to the center for work or shopping. The value to the city is that higher residential densities could occur closer to the urban corridor, rather than the outlying areas, and helping to deter urban sprawl. The value to the region is higher densities next to large commercial zones, increases the foot and vehicular traffic to the local retail centers, rather than development in the outlying areas, which would tend to encourage these people to shop elsewhere. 31. The site at 16608 Broadway Ave. is a large lot and single family or duplex lots so close to the big box retail stores will never be compatible or desirable from a development basis by the applicant. There are two nearby multi-family residential projects building phase II, which suggests there still is a viable market. The Comprehensive Plan update is a long-range 20 year plan, however and demand for higher densities near the urban core would seem to make sense. 3g. The State of Washington is projected to increase its population by about a million people over the next ten years. It is definitely considered a growth state. Therefore, this Comprehensive Plan Update should be revised to accommodate and manage this growth in a thoughtful and efficient manner. The current zone adjacent to the large retail centers located on Broadway Ave. is not a compatible use, nor does it comply with urban growth standards to create residential densities near urban centers. 3h. The applicant believes that along with rezoning the property at 16608 Broadway Ave., the city should also consider extending the higher MF-2 zone to the west a few parcels to connect the 16608 Broadway Ave. site to the existing multi-family project and possibly rezone the property on the same side of the street and adjacent to the Kohl's center moving east for a few parcels to obtain a true transitional buffer between the high-density retail area and the single family zone to the east. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Stephen Ford APPLICATION No: CAR-2015-0004 through CAR-2015-0009 PROPERTY OWNER: Parcel No: 45231.1362 and 45231.1363 = Stephen Ford Parcel No: 45231.1106 = PMC One, LLC Parcel No: 45231.1109 = Christopher& Marcelle Grimes Parcel No: 45231.1358 = Eugene Rettig Parcel No: 45231.1110 = James & Laura Homer SITE ADDRESS: 15410 East 2na Avenue; 226 South Sullivan PARCEL No: 45231.1362, 1.1363, Road; 302 South Sullivan Road; 15411 & 15423 East 4th 1.1106, 1.1109, 1.1358 and 1.1110 Avenue CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Parcel Nos: 45231.1362, 45231.1363, 45231.1106 and 45231.1109 = Office (0) Parcel Nos: 45231.1358 and 45231.1110 = Medium Density Residential (MDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) or Corridor Mixed Use (CM U) ZONING DESIGNATION: Parcel Nos: 45231.1362, 45231.1363, 45231.1106 and 45231.1109 = Office (0) Parcel Nos: 45231.1358 and 45231.1110 = Medium Density Multi-Family Residential District (MF-1) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) or Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Summary of Request: The proposal submitted for the 6 parcels referenced above is to change the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from 0 and MDR to NC, or CMU resulting in a re-zone from 0 and MF-1 to NC or CMU. Context: The addresses, lot sizes and existing uses for each of the 6 parcels are provided in the table below. The lot size of all parcels total 2 acres or 87,534 square feet (sqft). Parcel No Address Lot size Use 45231.1110 15410 East 2na Avenue 12,525 sqft Single-family residence 45231.1109 226 South Sullivan Road 11,562 sqft Single-family residence 45231.1106 302 South Sullivan Road 11,690 sqft Single-family residence 45231.1362 0 South Sullivan Road 26,518 sqft Vacant 45231.1363 15423 East 4tn Avenue 15,735 sqft Professional office 45231.1358 15411 East 4th Avenue 9,504 sqft Single-family residence The surrounding parcels to the north are zoned 0, MF-1, CMU and C; zoning to the south is 0 and MF-1, located to the east is NC and MF-2 zoning and lastly MF-1 zoning is located west of proposed area. The uses in the vicinity of each parcel are identified in the following table: CAR-2015-0004-0009—Staff Analysis Page 1 Parcel North South East West 45231.1110 Across 2hd Avenue Residences Residence, multi- Residences is a Medical Office occupancy and Residences commercial bldgs. and apartments 45231.1109 Residence Across 2hd Avenue Residence Multi-occupancy is a Medical Office commercial buildings and Residences and apartments 45231.1106 Residence Residence Vacant; portion Multi-occupancy used for parking lot commercial buildings for office to south and apartments 45231.1362 Vacant; portion Residence Office Multi-occupancy used for parking commercial buildings lot for office to and apartments south 45231.1363 Professional Vacant; portion Residence and Multi-occupancy Office used for parking apartments. commercial bldgs. and lot for office to Looking SE is a gas apartments south station/convenience store 45231.1358 Residence Vacant lot and Apartments Professional Office Residences The 6 proposed parcels are accessed from 3 different streets. Two parcels are accessed from 2nd Avenue designated as a local access street, two parcels are accessed from 4th Avenue designated as a collector and the remaining two parcels are accessed from Sullivan Road designated as a principal arterial. Implications: A rezone of the 6 subject parcels to NC would allow a broader range of uses, including commercial, townhouse development, specialty retail, and office, among others. A rezone of the 6 subject parcels to CMU would allow those commercial uses and additionally allow a limited amount of light industrial uses. With the exception of one vacant parcel, the parcels are currently developed with professional office and single-family homes, any change in designation to these parcels may have implications for future redevelopment. Uses allowed in the CMU zone vary significantly from those currently allowed under the existing designations. Uses in the NC zone are consistent with existing uses in the area. Differences in development standards include reduced height standards and rear yard setbacks. Traffic in the vicinity is already impacted by trip generating uses, such as the Central Valley High School and residential areas to the south of the site which are primarily accessed by Sullivan Road. The following table provides a comparison of the development standards for each zone: MF-1, 0, NC and CMU Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Front Rear Side Coverage Width Depth Height Yard Yard Yard Existing MF-1 40 ft. 65% 20 ft. 80ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. O 100 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 0 ft.* 0 ft.* Proposed NC 35 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 0 ft.* 0 ft.* CMU 50ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. *Exception for properties adjacent to a residential use or zone shall maintain a 20 foot setback along the side and rear. CAR-2015-0004-0009—Staff Analysis Page 2 Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the specific focus area of Office zones identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the public input themes of Economic Opportunity identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if NC is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of NC zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less NC zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine, if NC is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property D. Photos E. Application Material CAR-2015-0004-0009—Staff Analysis Page 3 Comprehensive Plan Map Iv1HI- / E45231.1110 15410E 2ND AVE 4523*K1106� /303S L1VAN;RD2 4523,1,.1 �362 Study Are] 10-ADDREss EINKNOWN 358 !1361.1 3 15411 E 4TH AVE /154E j�T,HPAVE� Fourth-Ave CAR 15-004 Request: Applicant: Stephen Ford Change the Comprehensive Plan map from O/MDR to Spokane Parcel#: See Map CMU/NC;subsequent Rezone from O/MF-1 to NC . Walley Address: See Map Zoning Map 45Z 1. 11- /EVA, -R/�� 4 90111' 154fia EE 2aQE 45 L'LVA'. ,R Study Area 5 -0(41:0?E tr 4 > f/of5% 45-2- 1 411 E 4-4•EI:kAVE E542-%E�� Fourth Ave • CAR 15-004 Request: Applicant: Stephen Ford Change the Comprehensive Plan map from O/MDR to Sp0 ane Parcel#: See Map CMU/NC;subsequent Rezone from 0/MF-1 to NC Address: See Map a 1 rir , i ;, iii 11111 . 11 .,\- :UI. 3 . UL I A r 'u _ _. _ I* .� 4 � �o�P0O " mom 8 { Sr 4 ,: l![ 4 fJ fi�0 a to Art AK gag � _ Cru Ea i lb 1 - Study Area IIPI kagai 5: fl4990 atgtiga f. 4.. C� 4T A E 4T /A not Fourth a99 i ,.01.;10. IN y _ .v n mu,Ip iti, n els . - . , 1 7 III 41 _may* AIM CAR 15-004 Request: Spokane Applicant: Stephen Ford Change the Comprehensive Plan map from O/MDR to Parcel#: See Map CMU/NC;subsequent Rezone from O/MF-1 to NC . Walley Address: See Map r h ,r q-- I �y Y , � �� -1'''_' .. A +' _ A4.. - 1mmi =11 * f - �- i---..1.--- .1' s Looking SW onto site Looking NW onto site v • ^ { r t� y j • • 1 I .b7^.. d _.._�-.n'ter,�., ., •' -. Fal,...„ 'Y s aM� rte. :y i _ ,.,0K--.-r- _ - � _ • _ _..� � Tt .. - -_. Looking East _ — Looking West onto site .1 _ :. . rf,....„.... , .. ,..„ ,,... ...:„.. r: . , .. ; 7 , V Zip Trip J y • .',Jr F- i t' '.. Looking SE Looking West • ... _1 ____ _ ___ _ __ , , .. . ..... .. , . _ i . 41 A ..., r -# 4p' S . 2. moi: i I ' "'� t._ is 3. - -- •=--••sem_ `.. _• —._ - ._ t .'-- -- F @ca- --._ - rM a Looking West onto site __ , _ , Looking SW Spokane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 4,0000Va CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APP KATION _ Y' LS--CrtN OR ri-:(31 PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION tAs '` t,11 Y Map amendment; or ElText amendment COC,`0.yA APPLICANT NAME: S A, Pi Fre--1 MAILING ADDRESS: 3 2d �� _1.11 V`A oAl CITY: S ®dtcrr " a/ STATE: ZIP: fy03 7 PHONE: gZ ti ')-y®! FAX: -7-13 GUI CELL: r63 7f EMAIL:74/11061/4-`-e PROPERTY OWNER: S F c/i MAILING ADDRESS: 3 - r- CITY: r L"c V 1 + STATE: ZIP: 191.3 7 PHONE: I201-2-110 , FAX: ti7 OS P CELL: (61-247.f EMAIL: 4f,dfIav ad/,Ge, SITE ADDRESS: Vol Con 1 (d PARCEL NO.: t S Z 3 I, /3 & 2 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: v C G PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: G C C ZONING DESIGNATION: C®'IA/AV /'1 1X@ ll.Ce ®r /la i' 6'v 4,, PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: C`77-6clie. rice vt 4"1" Ae/AI 44'AlOrl ® 1 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of r paper): Cv✓'rf t 1 e►4�dn del q "I 4 fjptue 1r tcot /d�r�U, r , fy Jai+7 1.1ce oe .117,ter4 Ge Allft 1--r MAR ? 7 2015 i„ iY_...... _ _._.. ... _�..._il�i ut PL-48 V1.0 Page 4 of 5 Spokane Ualle . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 11 y CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) SRI Ac �ae" , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. , 001111 2 —f9—tx- (Signatu + (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 a r R 2015 Spokane Valle SPOKANE v `LLE',,,Fta- COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Community ofOpportunity ' u t,1P,iUP11T\? DEVE WIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION L441-2 PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION it Is- Map sMap amendment; or ❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: [ �1 is Fa( MAILING ADDRESS: 1 2 s- T1//«rte CITY: s r `n a VA`Fey STATE: ZIP: 14' .7 7 PHONE: 12-Y '2-Yea Fax: '12-7-13( CELL: r6 -2-6-7.1-- EMAIL: 411416✓e a®rC®ry PROPERTY OWNER: C/✓%,1' 64+.+ e. ~ MAILING ADDRESS: )-'24 S fail v.-I, / 1 CITY: } .kir r V ae STATE: A7//i- ZIP: ' /el 7 PHONE: FAX/: CELL: 963-S.arr. EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: 2.2.Q S ' 5//1I✓an gel PARCEL No.: 41f 2-3 /. //G 9 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: G F�7cc PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: (id ten d® f'') fk col al< 6S met `7 d PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: -6ef�� 1 (ice J /,1'e- 00e' '1¢r1h6Q/LoJ ro--(4.4 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): TC 1 'AA .c / vs< r=9 /let 0,F6 c� V rc rc oio4t /i,e(d I MAR 27 2015 PL-48 V1.0 Page 4 of 5 Spokane ,r,, '�alleY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I S . 4en "c , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully And to the best of my knowledge. r ( .nature) (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 Spokane ` ` .0000Valley COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE C -ID AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity s?0\1� sOte.706, co- PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION [ Map amendment; or ❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: �X •ft f<��i°` MAILING ADDRESS: 3 2-01 S - CITY: ' (41(.1 `1 STATE: ZIP: 757°'-'? 7 PHONE: 7Ly-"If"a FAX: 1,2'1-(?Pl CELL: --2-6 7f' EMAIL: ( fif4" eqo/r PROPERTY OWNER: ` i' c- Oi& 1_44_ MAILING ADDRESS: 15 7 c. /1i4/'d< .c CITY: Si n c STATE: ZIP: 2--d PHONE: 1)-G -f7Sj FAX: CELL: 1-GYz3 EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: .4-' S gPARCEL NO.: + 5 2'3 p • //,&"6 d COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: T`P't C PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ®F C e ZONING DESIGNATION: C®y-li dv. a'1 U-T4 or t 4&g®i(vo �,ep PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: G a�YF �� /41 a)C"J USC a". Ae 6a0,4/1 cc ," BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): ;olice, 4; 1 vie it "rel ?if7.if . ®Q ✓e ,s,�swrn wr gg /11' ,i <cc 4 - teCA. c. I . L 5 O"iJ V�J o,4 ani E.. tib;^ f ¢{� E1.anP?€., MAR 2 7 2015 PL-48 V1.0 is!ax?± ___.Page S Spokane ValleCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Y CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) 5C-1 , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. --/y—/� (Signa rre) (Date) PL-48.V1.0 Page 5 of 5 Spokane ,,,, 00Val1ey. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ttil CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Cortir Of Opportunity ry PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION Map amendment; or ❑ Text amendment C©t:'�\\* APPLICANT NAME: S�C�t r 1 Fore"--6 MAILING ADDRESS: 3 2--- CITY: CITY: 1,sA` i1e STATE: �14 ZIP: 973 7 PHONE: 1 -1 ?ire? FAX: 67)-7— /30( CELL: T63 267.r"EMAIL: 14la//4 6440 l,CDS PROPERTY OWNER: cf iS n f<,- MAILING ADDRESS: 3?-ci CITY: S}t> cn c V4(f e STATE: ZIP: 17°3 PHONE: /) -2 y ®d FAX: '2-7 --I;a& CELL:Q'63 "2"6 7,t' EMAIL: rcita`1*- `IkU/,CO., SITE ADDRESS: 3 2-o r. .51/111 0„.., "et PARCEL No.: ( c 2 I /3 6 3 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 6 ?C e PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 0 C1C7G ZONING DESIGNATION: (div-r 0` /11 tYto/ /4 O/ Aeri Vey- ,1, PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: C C tr'® ^'I (3Ce .4"-Cd ,ar/ler f dsteAPF , BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): C-vr'lc/1 f Lias 4.-1Ca 1—.0en e$ iv„ rel7C- �- 14es-el 4 flak/ 1V cvft`n ,01‹J-r d- 4, 4 es 71' ti-Ce 6?-11' ter? e,1 155.;1/4c:P,1 L:ig tiering MAR 2 l 2a15 Projec.:ti- VV ,.bO0 1 Nos no PL-48 V1.0 Page 4 of 5 Spokane .000• Valle COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Y CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, 5 4 c (1 , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully And to the best of my knowledge. 2 —Pt—1S— (Signat '"= (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 Spokane alley COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 11 yR CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION 6rnmunityofOpportunity 5 CE br .CY - CR �� � �'\VA PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION S. \-\ Map amendment; or ❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: c 4k.r f. tr MAILING ADDRESS: 3 2-0 ,L CITY: je•ka.r-t V{a ty STATE: it/4- ZIP: .9'f73 7 PHONE: -2-4e0 FAX: 27 -Oa I CELL: rt,3-x7r EMAIL: c-atIGw/GQb if,cart PROPERTY OWNER: '6'17 e^ "/".11°} MAILING ADDRESS: ri '� ' f�ga(c( ,� ,Cf-- CITY: 5,.. k0.r STATE: Arn ZIP: A PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: ( / Il E . 0�� PARCEL NO.: /S 2 3 I r /3 s8� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: /1F PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Mt - 1 ZONING DESIGNATION: 6',/7-0 elf4t," eke) tJ-g" e_ u✓ e 114 40,4 0y PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Ce- 7 1 tfl, ' 'i)c e°a (4l 0,(Q4.' BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): /7-‹ fc C-X"^ c i-r 6v11r osc 4 s,r, FVfolie /leer €ict p O✓ rc 1� BAR 2 7 2015 PL-48 V1.0 --z Page 4 of 5 Spokane _ ValleyCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) 1, x745 « r , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfufly and to the best of my knowledge. 2 (Signat.�a (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 Spokanje Valle COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Yi CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION Map amendment; or ❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: > ftp d t A # 0 MAILING ADDRESS: 3 24/ S. s✓f/ - oeet CITY: - a Kc-n r 4 1(ti! STATE: ZIP: 9903 7 PHONE: 12°1 y 'O FAX: 12-7 —(3O' CELL: r63'247-r EMAIL: •Pae'/Ia.4-, 46. I.C®. PROPERTY OWNER: 504,-01eX ,,4t, MAILING ADDRESS: / $ Y/O C , A/1 CITY: Sd &A(' ' p r STATE: Allf. ZIP: 9 P3 7 PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: 1$ 1 I O e PARCEL No.: I'S 2.3 1 /1/0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: •1 F - I PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: 41 F- ZONING DESIGNATION: L P'f tI0 M I CJ U,C` &s Ae{146,--1y,9 cc.,,4A„1 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Goll r Uf <1 kc d vl C >{ 6atay BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): A.-,74 r. d- 6&r t c/ Jt, tf- c®nxs QA a+ A.ccit r>-prr' ¢l MAR 27 2015 PL-48 111.0 Page 4 of 5 Spokane Valle COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Y" CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) S$ < A , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. 3 1Y-Js— (Signat `e ^ (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 The reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment is to make the zoning consistent with the surrounding properties and to more adequately meet the needs of the community. a. The proposed amendment would allow for development that could enhance the public health, safety,and welfare and would protect the environment. b. The proposed change is consistent with the current comp plan. c. The proposed change is in response to the development of the properties across the street and the increased needs in the neighborhood. d. The proposed change does correct an obvious mapping error that has become apparent over the passage of time. e. The four properties along Sullivan are currently zoned office, and the office zone is currently not needed and underperforming(excessive office space available in the City). The proposed Map amendment would have: a. some impact upon the physical environment,but that impact would be positive.The properties currently have older/worn out homes that should be destroyed and replaced with new buildings that are professionally landscaped. b. there would be minimal impact on the open spaces and no impact upon streams,rivers,or lakes. c. this has become a business corridor and future development would be compatible with the neighborhood, d. the community facilities,utilities,roads,public transportation,parks,schools,etc. as currently constructed could easily support what minimal impact a small development such as this one could generate. e. the neighborhood needs the services that could be provided. f. there is a limited amount of land that could be utilized in unison to provide the services that are needed in the area. g. the current population densities in the area would not be impacted by the proposed comprehensive map amendment. h. the effect upon the comprehensive plan would be to correct the zoning of property that is currently underperforming as office. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Dennis Crapo APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0010/0011 PROPERTY OWNER: Dennis & Melissa Crapo and Leo &Ann Cysewski Living Trust SITE ADDREss: 13215 & 13313 E. 4th Avenue PARCEL No.: 45221.9104 & 45221.9107 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (MDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential (HDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: Medium Density Multifamily Residential district (MF-1) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: High Density Multifamily Residential district (MF-2) Summary of Request: The proposal seeks to change the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from MDR to HDR resulting in a re-zone from MF-1 to MF-2. Context: Parcel#45221.9017 is 4.38 acres in size and parcel#45221.9107 is 2.39 acres, totaling approximately 6.77 acres. The site is partially developed with a single family dwelling and apartments built to the current density allowed of 12 units per acre. The property is adjacent to properties zoned MF-1 to both the east and west. Properties located south across 4 Avenue are zoned R-3 and properties to the north are zoned Corridor Mixed Use. The uses in the immediate vicinity of the property are primarily single family dwellings. There is an existing apartment complex on parcel 45221.9017. Directly north of the site are a variety of commercial uses located along Sprague Avenue. The site is accessed from 4th Avenue, a collector, and is located between McDonald, a minor arterial, and Blake Road, a local access street. Implications: A re-zone of the parcel to MF-2 would allow a higher density of residential development up to 22 units per acre. Additional allowed uses in the MF-2 zone include professional, vocational, and trade schools. Furthermore, transitional housing is a conditional use in the MF-2 zone. Should the site be re-zoned and subsequently developed at a higher density allowed under the MF-2 zone, impacts to the surrounding neighborhood may include increased traffic. Additionally, height limits are 10 feet greater than what is allowed in the MF-1 zone. Impacts resulting from this proposal will be mitigated through implementation of the City's development regulations for relational height limits and landscape screening. CAR-2015-0010-0011—Staff Analysis Page 1 A general comparison of the development standards applicable to each zone is as follows: MF-1 and MF-2Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Coverage Area Width Depth Front/Flanking Rear Side Garage Height Yard Yard Yard MF-1 40 ft. 60% 3,600 45 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. MF-2 50 ft. 65% 2,000 20 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. Focus areas and public input themes: The application appears to align itself with the focus area of multifamily zones identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan update process. The application appears to align itself with the public input theme of housing identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if HDR is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of HDR zoned parcels including identification of the need for more or less HDR zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if HDR is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Photo of subject property D. Photos E. Application Materials CAR-2015-0010-0011—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map .N. .._ X. . .,,, .. . .N. 3rd I 3rd IStudy Area x P ,._ 4th C } 5th r t CAR 15-010,15-011 Request: Applicant: Dennis Crapo Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45221.9017, .9107 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 Val leY Address: 13215/13313 E 4th Ave Zoning Map .N. .._ X. . .,,, .. .N. 3rd I 3rd Study Area x 4th 5th (--- ‘t CAR 15-010,15-011 Request: Applicant: Dennis Crapo Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45221.9017, .9107 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 Val leY Address: 13215/13313 E 4th Ave c. . 1 . ------mwo h ii .„. _ ___ 0 imin• ..!Fil .. . ; __ . ._._ _. . , _.,,.. i _ ! !f t 1r 111111: It111 41111111111111M1116WA +,w1 I i f LL ` Study Area I . 1.:1'_hi: .N Ilk To . .,„ ., loci _ 1 III - L_1)ito . — [. w- t ' 6t5 IF il E ' il . IC n tek0 .I I b lor hulL. ] I I 17-1 , ,,.__ ., CAR 15-010,15-011 Request: Spokane Applicant: Dennis Crapo Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Parcel#: 45221.9017, .9107 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 Val ley Address: 13215/13313 E 4th Ave • SUL — Ir ,�` U e p i J j • y- aligaanalkiailii ii _ r",,,,. .1-Lt ,�r _ -P ,r f.. _ Looking NE Looking West onto site duri- u f y' 7711,L& -.• r - , �, f ` • = fs : 1 W.S& _ leY - .. .-_ Looking SE onto site Looking South onto site ---- 4., m..— ._,__v , ..___ ... S ......., , 1 r. -.1i.,,,,, , ,,,;:- ..,„_, / -�{ t , tog3I * .� _,., . ,y,• l r 41 1I ��" !, ..4_.t..-.TP,`...i.4.1.1rte. - r-r'.-r"' ,. ... 4 Y - lit MONMEM +°g .Iffi4` a �' x 44 t . n` ,,,.-F ,� it st 'y. _ _ .t •, - - ,. T L Looking South onto site Looking West onto site l fl pilinc414 ..f i *EFt d F}}F 'MY � .�'. ten FFF 11' AIM liFill —"'"14,1114011 ' ya 3' d'' ihr 0116 ' NL;i Y,1 . `•�r7s i .P} f fir.-._ -__.._--__ .,- .,_.L._. '.••� - __z- -_ - G - Looking NE _ Looking SW "tiokane ►�I ci COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPLICATION rdl 1 `,r CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Coin/mm/1T of Of .*arma!P }tee- . , CO1 PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION ® Map amendment; or fl Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: Dennis Crapo MAILI 1GAaDRESS: 2602 N Sullivan Rd CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA Zip: 902216 PHONE.: 509-924-8964 FAX: , CELL: EMIL: Crapodennis(gmail_com PROPERTYOWNER: Dennis & Melissa Crap() MAILING AanRess: 2602 N Sullivan Rd CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99216 PHONE: 509-924-8964 LAX: CELL: EMAIL:crap odenrris. gmarrl.com SITE ADDRESS: 13313E 4th Ave PARCEL NO.: 4221.9017 COmPREHEIJsIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: "OR PROPOSELI COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: HDR ZoNeNG DESrGr ATION: NiF-1 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-2 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AraENOMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of poper). Provide additional affordable units in an area of mult.farnily housing in a transition zone between Corridor Mixed Use that its built out with extensive commercial development and existing single family housing on the south side of the collector road, 4th Ave. RECEIVED ' fl vel ipmOnl Encimering MAR 2 7 2015 pi opil — P L-46 V1.4 Page 4 of 5 *Paine 40,00Va1leyCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Carrrnrirr70,o Oppolidni1y^ PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signa'ure of Cegal oWner Or applica nt) I, Dennis Crapo , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. 3fzc--1 (Signature) - ---- — {Date} PL-40 V1.0 page 5 of.5 S.0010 Olane Ile COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION ['rdrirrli ini.a ul CJ;J1.i 1ioniti 071711 J - -fir/ fir f+ A ( PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION Q Map amendment; or ElText amendment APPLICANT NAME: Dennis Crapo MAILING ADDRESS: 2602 N Sullivan Rd CITY: Spokane Valle)/ STATE: WA ZIP: 99216 PHONE: 509-924-8964 FAX: CELL: EMAIL: crapOdeni iS rjmail.cam PROPERTY OWNER : Leo & Anne C sewski Livin. Trust MAILINGADOREss: 10220 Lambs Ln CITY: Mica STATE: WA ZIP: 99023 PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: 13215 E 4th Ave PARCEL No.: 45221.9107 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MDR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: HDR ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-1 PROPOSES ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-2 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): Provide additional affordable units in an area of multifamily housinctin a transition zone between Corridor Mixed Use that is bI.ilt out with extensive commercial development and existin,s single Family housing on the south side of the collector road,4th Ave. PL-40 V1.0 Page 4 of 5 .0•015'Valley COMPREHENSIVE FLAN UPDATE CI11ZEN•RTIATEID AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Comm rt'rr of Opporontin. PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) 1, Dennis Drape . (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge l g natu re) (Date) PL-4R V1.0 Page o{5 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Narrative Medium Density Residential (MDP)/MF-1 Multifamily Medium Density Residential to High Density Residential (HDR)I MF-2 Multifamily High Density Residential 4m Avenue between McDonald Rd and Blake Rd Parcel No.s 45221 ,9417 & 45221.9107 Reasons for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Request The subject property is located on the north side of 4"' Avenue between McDonald Rd and Blake Rd. The size of the subject properties totals approximately 6.6 acres. The comprehensive plan designation is MDR-Medium Density Residential and the parcels are currently zoned MF-1, Multifamily Medium Density Residential District. The subject properties are bordered by MDR-Medium Density Residential to the east and west and LDR-Low Density Residential to the south across 4th Ave. Corridor Mixed Use is to the north across an abandoned railroad right of way designated on the County property map as future right of way, Development of the subject property in a viable and subjective nature would be to continue similar multifamily residential uses found in the area, which is zoned MF-1 , Medium Density Multifamily Residential. It is the intent of the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment request, that upon approval, or as a part of the approval to HDR/MF-2, that the parcel be developed as a transition from the Commercial Mixed Use (CMU) land uses along Sprague Avenue to the north and the Single Family Residential (R-3) zone to the south of 4«' Avenue, a collector road. We believe that the subject property should be allowed to develop to the highest and best use in order to maximize density within the City of Spokane Valley, which would be HDR (MF-2). The change in designation would be a continuation of existing multifamily zoning of adjacent properties and not hecorne an island of incompatible uses. Further, the property's location south of the intense Sprague Ave. commercial mixed use area is more conducive to higher density residential uses than single family residential uses, Approval Criteria A. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The proposed amendment will have a minimal impact to the sr rrounclIng properties. The proposed amendment will provide transition from the commercial uses to the north of the subject property. The low density residential areas to the south will not be adversely affected with the required relational setbacks, landscaping and buffering requirements under the current development code. LDA uses south of 4th Avenue will be buffered by the collector right-of-way. The proposed amendment will benefit the community as a whole by providing needed additional affordable housing options, centralizing public services and maximizing the use of those services which are near the subject properties. B. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCVS 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment The proposed amendment is consistent with RCW 36.70A planning goals by reducing the inappropriate conversion of undeveloped land into sprawling, low-density development and encouraging the availability of affordable housing to ail economic segments of the population and promoting a variety of residential densities and housing types. The proposed amendment is consistent with land use goal I to preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods in that there is multifamily housing in this corridor between the Sprague Ave commercial and the 41h Ave collector, This proposal will infill the area between the Sprague Ave commercial and the 41b Ave collector. Additionally, there is MOR to the west and east and this will encourage development within an urban area by providing infill development acting as a transition from the higher intensity commercial uses along Sprague Avenue to the low density residential uses to the south of 4r1 Ave. The proposed amendment is consistent with land use policy 1.1 where the character of the neighborhood will not be changed as multifamily land use is adjacent to the east and west. The proposal is also consistent with land use policy t2 where the proposal will not change the use from residential. C, The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; The changes to the economic climate is a condition beyond the properties'owner control. The economic changes that have occurred over the past few years have increased the demand for more affordable multifamily and rental units and decreased the demand for single family housing. The proposed amendment would help fulfill this shift in housing demands. Additionally, the change is a logical extension of the existing multifamily uses in the area of the properties and allows a transition from heavily developed commercial uses to low density residential. D. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; The proposed amendment does not correct a mapping error. E, The proposed amendment addresses on identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. incremental increase in population of the proposed amendment. The following schools that serve the area are: Central Halley High School, Fvergreen Middle School, and Summit Elementary School. The proposed amendment is anticipated to have minimal impact to the schools listed above. Public Transportation is provided by STA with stops along Sprague Avenue, north of the property. E. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region: The proposed amendment will benefit the neighborhood by maintaining the character of the neighborhood as both an urban mutlifamily residential area and single family residential area. The proposed amendment is in an appropriate location to allow for an infill development of high density which will maximize the land use within the City of Spokane Valley and reduce the need for sprawl as it is north of a collector for traffic from the west and east and will act as a transition to the more intense commercial uses to the north. The proposed amendment will allow for the use of existing streets and urban services and lead to a more efficient deliverer of those services. The proposed amendment will also encourage alternative modes of transportation such as walking, biking, and bus routes. Also in this area a bus route currently exists along Sprague Avenue. As densities increase, it allows for bus routes to be added or altered to serve the larger population. The proposed amendment will increase the ability of residents to live and work within close proximity to commercial, retail and office uses that serve the existing neighborhood and the City of Spokane Valley as a whole. F. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; The proposed amendment will not create an isolated district which is unrelated to the surrounding neighborhood. 3_ The current and projected population density in the area; The existing comprehensive plan and zoning designation of the subject property has the potential to be developed up to 81 units, compared to the proposed amendments potential development of the subject property into 149 multifamily residential units. The proposed comprehensive plan amendment will allow for an increase in population density; however the size of the amendment does not demand a population analysis. H. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan; The proposed amendment is within close proximity to services that would be beneficial to a multifamily development. These services include but are not limited to the existing Sprague Ave commercial corridor, as well as the public transportation system that currently passes near the subject properties on Sprague Avenue. The proposed site- specific amendment is consistent with the overall comprehensive plan and will have a minimal impact on all other aspects of the comprehensive plan, Policy HP-1.3 encourages the development of regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types, costs and designs. Allowing the conversion of the subject property to HDR will provide additional housing types for non-home owners, elderly and young people. Policy HP-2A encourages the activities of affordable housing providers. Allowing the conversion of the subject property to HDR will provide additional housing opportunities to the public. Policy CFP-1.3 encourages optimizing the use of existing public facilities and promoting orderly compact urban growth. Allowing the conversion of the subject property to FICn will allow more peop}e to use the existing public facilities to include water, sewer and streets and will allow these uses in a more compact area. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Paul Engel, PE; Anderson Engineering APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0012 PROPERTY OWNER: O'Reilly Auto Enterprises. LLC; c/o Scott Kraus SITE ADDRESS: No Address PARCEL No.: 45163.0585 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential (HDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-2, High Density Multi-family Residential district (MF-2) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: CMU, Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) Summary of Request: The proposal submitted for this parcel is to change the Land Use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from HDR to CMU resulting in a rezone from MF-2 to CMU. Context: Parcel No. 45163.0585 (located 145 feet north of E. Sprague Ave) is 10, 924 square feet in area (.25 acres). The parcel is currently vacant. Skipworth Road, which is designated as a local access street, provides access to the site. The applicant also owns a parcel along Sprague Avenue that abuts the east one-third portion of the subject property, and three parcels on the east of Bowdish Road along Sprague Avenue. The land use designations of the adjacent parcels to the immediate north include HDR and contain apartment buildings. The land use designations of the parcels to the east, south and west (across N. Skipworth Road) are CMU and contain commercial buildings with retail sales uses. Implications: The High Density Multifamily (MF-2)designation allows for different housing types and can accommodate densities up to 22 units per acre. This designation provides a transition between higher intensity land uses, such as commercial and office, and medium and lower density single-family neighborhoods. The CMU designation encourages development of commercial and retail uses, higher density residential, lodging and offices along Sprague Avenue. A rezone of the parcel would allow a broader range of uses, including commercial, retail and light industrial. Maximum building height limit would not change while the setbacks for the commercial zone would increase or stay the same since the side yard setback is 20' when adjacent to a residential zone. Screening and landscaping would likely mitigate some of the impacts caused by commercial uses. CAR-2015-0012—Staff Analysis Page 1. The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones. MF-2 and CMU Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage MF-2 50 ft. 65% 20 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 10 ft. 20 ft. CMU 50 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 20 ft. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the specific focus area of Mixed Use zones identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the public input themes of Economic Opportunity identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if CMU is an appropriate designation for this parcel. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of CMU zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less CMU zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if CMU is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property D. Photos E. Application materials CAR-2015-0012—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map .„,,,,,,,, -•,,,:NN,s,,N::N::N:s7 Study Area I N'T'''''''''''''''''''''N-NN -....---....--„sNi '''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''N4: --N Sprague _ • NSANN...... N CAR 15-0012 Request: lil Enterprises Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from HDR to Spokane Applicant.Ppcant. O ReilEpries .000 Valley Parcel#: 45163.0585 CMU;subsequent Rezone from MF-2 to CMU Address: Address Unknown Zoning Map l1 I ME i Olrve III__I _ ■� r i m" 11 II : Elvane a 1111■■ uuuullIlmI 11.111 ■ _ m, 1111■11 ‘fto Front L II!II ain malu ■ N NN L!Iii \ x Study Area1 . .w wt.t.. . . &.\ Ri�enside \� ,‘.N. 1 ,-t,, , , Sprague \ Lt • tat ._ „ \ice - \ NDN \� 4th i IIIram■■ ■■■II■ i ■ iIi i■ ■■■� ■ __r_IIE CAR 15-0012 Request: Applicant: 0 Reilly Enterprises Change the Comprehensive Plan map from HDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45163.0585 CMU;subsequent Rezone from MF-2 to CMU . .'Y Address: Address Unknown ,,,r s- . �� y� 1 d IA ,, RINP '•. d ,.V N id el to w i -- r; - t - - Study Area "Lill . - 1 juk. . ikt.,.. 7 it 111 , � -- � . . *#lam -+. ".- ---• .. 1111 : ill ,, 41i I ,, . , _ ___ , , ..1. ,,— I lo 2 ' .r 1 . ,+ �: k food-- „k.r. , _r,# , fair —_ PagUe 1lop__ __ MO 11 -� R � I. is .. j oro- : ■ . _ to. CAR 15-0012 Request: Applicant: 0 Reilly Enterprises Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from HDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45163.0585 CMU;subsequent Rezone from MF-2 to CMU .000 Address: Address Unknown ',. +, d • }mss 4-'41'.' e r r',.kr •7 yr :]C{. r "aa r�.' .0 _ 7� A i' ' J I h x �'�..: p • da'; ,'r a. - rfa e • • 3.$r , 1 � SI rr • • • • • • 6 y-,r,'_775-•-• yLk 1x+}ti-4+*re' ti '••••'.2r47-- Y "rri S 1 rp . • 1•.1,,4--Z21;6•16'7'•.1.6 kJ" 7' L •'' x aC" yJ JLL r5'. -1,1','...11-..:'ky! +� .h7 1 ; .,454,1".y4,..-,7,4 5F ., r�P ydt , t ,A -,,0-el ' '� p'` ' f { F _ ` J 4 a a�,,� 7-4 .' 1. -Y , [ y -rYS. tiT r �•' '4. t+Y , 'te • • • 1. • •'S.- 1 .• 4� I Yce i+aR �f •,. e ., t a'- - � ° t • 4ry ' F� 't ; n:*7::'7,'. if .'_P4e -fy .-a _ . '' k !+ek. } f "t 7 L �k ',..Y`'•,,- - ll r a4Siff.0 ti Looking East onto site Looking East - r '` � , � ! tJ ir,L i'f' 7 'L 4 5 r • A b s I J �V.. �.e' _ T Y4 • P' F�., l v. �v.. kfn ,•} "' -, T'. '7�+ .- - r'-s-J ,5 ��r lAs7°'!' !..Y ''4 d,y(�.. l { St:- ��p _ r k., r r.' r'7 7 mak s e •-, t • • �G r 1 j• �t l ,i I } - I • .amu ti -• --- 1- 1 :. `: i .� • sT'^I• i t leF+' pil 4 - r `�' `I rl�I FII k, s v `i ,ti• Je f ', iIJ!I ^t moi, ## eeIIIIIIII'I�,IIIli r f { rlu'u�Wl �'1 x • Talir x . r'.. Looking West Looking West onto site • tom= s I. • Looking South �;! '•4 r1.--, . r 4 �{+^pywi _ �. ...$L_ ! J 4fr Ili 11 d IIIIIIII' 1111111 _, `? M4 i . : 111111 id 41 — v.. ! J f ' • - }r N %. e Looking North *dime Valley COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE J CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community of Opportunity PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION • Map amendment; or ❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: PAUL ENGEL, PE; ANDERSON ENGINEERING, INC. MAILINGADDREss: 2045 WEST WOODLAND ST CITY: SPRINGFIELD STATE: MO ZIP: 65807 417-866-2741 417-866-2778 417-840-2517 pengel@aeincmo.com PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: PROPERTY OWNER: O'REILLY AUTO ENTERPRISES, LLC.; SCOTT KRAUS MAILING ADDRESS: 233 S PATTERSON CITY: SPRINGFIELD STATE: MO ZIP: 65802 417-862-3333 skraus@oreillyauto.com PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: VACANT. NO ADDRESS PARCEL NO.: 45163.0585 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C M U PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: C M U ZONING DESIGNATION: M F-2 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: C M U BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): PROPERTY IS SURROUNDED BY CMU ZONING. MAP AMENDMENT WOULD BRING PROPERTY IN COMPLIANCE WITH NEIGHBORING ZONING AND RECOMMENDED ZONING PER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PL-48V1.0 Page4of5 poicane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Community nity ofOpporiinfiiy PART III -AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. (Sig ature) (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 it ANDERSON Irci ENGINEERING,INc EMPLOYEE OWNED Spokane Valley,WA-Comprehensive Plan Update-O'Reilly Automotive Enterprises, LLC(Sprague& Bowdish) 2015 Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request(CAR)Application CAR Narrative: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. Parcel 45163.0585 is currently zoned MF-2 and is proposed to be zoned CMU to be consistent with the 2 existing CMU parcels to the East, the 3 CMU parcels to the South and the 2 CMU parcels to the West. 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below: a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; The proposed amendment will not have any adverse impact to public health, safety, welfare or the environment since no work is planned. The amendment simply updates the zoning to be consistent with neighboring zoning. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; The 2006 adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies this parcel to be part of the Corridor Mixed Use(CMU) zone and should have been updated at that time. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; The undeveloped parcel is almost completely surrounded by existing CMU zoning&recommended as CMU by 2006 Comprehensive Plan. d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or The undeveloped parcel is almost completely surrounded by existing CMU zoning&recommended as CMU by 2006 Comprehensive Plan. e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. The undeveloped parcel is almost completely surrounded by existing CMU zoning&recommended as CMU by 2006 Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a. The effect upon the physical environment; The proposal will have no effect upon the physical environment. Any future improvements will comply with City requirements to have no effect upon the physical environment. b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers,and lakes; The proposal will have no effect upon open space, streams, rivers and lakes due to the lack of any of these present in the immediate area. c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; The proposal will have no impact on adjacent land uses since the existing seven(7) neighboring properties are already zoned CMU. d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; The proposal will have no impact on community facilities since it is surrounded by the same proposed zoning. e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; The proposal will bring the parcel into consistent zoning with neighboring parcels. f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; The proposal will bring the parcel into consistent zoning with neighboring parcels. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and The proposal will not increase or have any effect on the population density since it is too small to develop. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal will be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan since it is recommend to be CMU. • 2045 W.WOODLAND•SPRINGFIELD, MO 65807• PH:417.866.2741 • FX:417.866.2778•E-MAIL:AEINC@AEINCM©.COM •WWW.AEINCMO.COM CIVIL ENGINEERING • SURVEYING • STRUCTURAL • MUNICIPAL • GEOTECHNICAL/DRILLING • MATERIALS TESTING Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME:Jerry &Angela Bishop APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0013 PROPERTY OWNER:Jerry&Angela Bishop SITE ADDRESS: 8021 E. Broadway PARCEL No.: 45182.9037 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Office (0) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential (HDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: Office (0) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: High Density Multifamily Residential district (MF-2) Summary of Request: The proposal submitted is a request to change the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map from 0 to HDR resulting in a rezone from 0 to MF-2. Context: The site is .44 acres in size and developed with a single-family residence and two detached accessory structures. Single family residences are located adjacent to the site along the east boundary and across Broadway Avenue to the south. A multi-family development is located to the north and west of the site. A vacant parcel that is zoned 0 lies adjacent to the west of the subject property and lies between the property and the multi-family complex to the west. The property containing the multi-family complex to the north is zoned MF-2. Properties west of the site are zoned 0 and properties east of the site and south across Broadway Avenue are zoned R-3. The site is accessed from Broadway Avenue, designated as a minor arterial in the City's Arterial Street Plan. The site is located between Park Road, a minor arterial and Blake Road, a local access street. Implications: A rezone of the parcel to MF-2 would allow a range of uses including higher density residential and self- storage facilities, while still permitting the professional offices currently allowed in the 0 zone. Development regulations for the MF-2 zone require lower building height and lot coverage than the current office designation, making impacts to the residences to the east of the site less than if the property was developed under the current 0 development standards. Impacts would be further mitigated through design requirements including relational setbacks and landscape buffering. CAR-2015-0002—Staff Analysis Page 1. A general comparison of the development standards applicable to each zone is as follows: 0 and MF-2 Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage O 100 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20ft. 20 ft. 20 ft. N/A MF-2 50 ft. 65% 20 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 20 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. Focus areas and public input themes: The application appears to align itself the focus areas of multi-family and office zones identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan update process. The application appears to align itself with the public input theme of housing identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if HDR is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of both 0 and HDR zoned parcels including identification of the need for more or less HDR zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if HDR is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property D. Photos E. Application Materials CAR-2015-0002—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map Study Area Broadway v - JI CAR 15-0013 Request: Spookane Applicant: Jerry&Angela Bishop Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to .000 Va I ley Parcel#: 45182.9037 HDR;subsequent Rezone from 0 to MF-2 Address: 8021 E Broadway Ave Zoning Map Study Area Broadway v JI CAR 15-0013 Request: Spookane Applicant: Jerry&Angela Bishop Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to Wal ley Parcel#: 45182.9037 HDR;subsequent Rezone from 0 to MF-2 Address: 8021 E Broadway Ave ff mo fI V if Ill ,IN : il Study Area ¢= I. In■I lilt is G / _ 4 L r 0 Brcud w.J I -allir_ ...111IMEMW- --- - _ - _ - . 1101 °, si —Or' , .i.I 3 _ P I CAR 15-0013 Request: Spokane Applicant: Jerry&Angela Bishop Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to Parcel#: 45182.9037 HDR;subsequent Rezone from 0 to MF-2 ......Val ley Address: 8021 E Broadway Ave r r ' .�` Tom'• • * Ji. s . ,:id .....- d)i• 111+ego kr t_ 1 _ . toy - • F ,° ' t • W F J .6 4 �r sti P:i 2 y4' far ' .:',.4" 'AK Looking SE 4, Looking East - ». ,_" -- ' 4' 4 1§ Y h. 1 A Y ns - ., ._ , v s, '4*R of 1 IL------ I Looking SW Looking West onto site ' w i ti s} M T� I -ti— Looking North onto site • 5s. •Y 'rt' 1. .xj':. , Fl$fL '� * rOA, ,1 . _ froAfr- yJ Mr-IFi _ail " kHEAE� 'a i �.' ! i Looking NE Looking West Spam' ne COMPRLHENSIVE PLAN UPIOATE. CITIZEN-INITIATED ANNENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION CiutirnftliflYrJ r'alanffIr PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION 0 Map amendment; or E Text amendment APPLICANT NAME:JERRY&ANGELA BISHOP MAILING ADDRESS: - 3704 E. Chaltarov Rd. STATE; CITY: CHATTARCY VITA ZIP; 99003 PHONE: 509-270- EM AIL: 3588 FAX: CELL: J6ISHOP7 GMAIL.COM FRoPFRTY OWNER: SAME As ARoVE MAILING ADDRESS; CITY' STATE: I ZIP: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SkTE AnnRESS: 8021 E Broa[luye,,j, Spr kene Valley, WA. 99212 PARCEL N0.:4b162.903 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESrGNATION: OFFICE PF OPOSEoCOMPREHENSIVEPLAN DESIGNATION: MF 2 ZONING DESIGNATION: PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION; BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of papery Comprehensive Plan Amendment from office to multi-family. There seems to be an over supply of office siace in the area but an inade+nate sus•l of newer io€d a ualit affordable housing,. PL-413V1.0 Page 4 of 5 rr ��#�■� , ��. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN !UPDATE CITIZEN-INI11ATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Comm arty of°ppm rti y PART III -- AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) 'Wet, Jerry &Angela Bishop- - -pr rfiame)-swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to thn best of our -knowledge. Pell.-7.11,5 MI Parity 3P . (Signatures) (Date) PL-48V1.0 Page 5of5 CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT SI Vlpo ne REQUEST APPLICATION 40000 Valley Community Development— Planning Division C'r�raarez2lrrrfil'Uf C�E:pvrYarri�f 11107 E Sprague Ave Sue 106 i Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5310 $ Fax: 509.688.0037 $ ptanntng spekenevralley.org COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. On January 6, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council approved a Public Participation Program (PPP) outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprehensive Plan update process. As indicated in the PPP, all citizens, neighborhood organizations, or others may submit an application to propose changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land use reap, zoning map, or development regulations. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (CARS) and will be evaluated for consideration by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. In order to be considered for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, CARS shall be filed no later than March 31, 2015_ Complete CAR applications will be reviewed for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update work program, and will be processed based upon ostablishedd criteria as well as the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the proposal. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take ore of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(S)for inclusion En the Comprehensive Plan update process; or • Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140;or • Deny the CARO) from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. PROCEDU RES 1, Application Period. The application period will commence at the first Comprehensive Plan update public meeting on January 28, 2015 and will close on March 31, 2015. Submittals received after the deadline shall not be considered. 2. Initial Review. Following the closing of the application period, the City shall review each application to determine whether to include the proposal in the Comprehensive Plan update work program. Staff shall review each application and prepare a report to the Planning Commission, which will make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and make a decision on which applications to include in the Comprehensive Plan update work program in May 2015. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under Me GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(e)for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or I. Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80.V10; or • Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. The application(s), if included in the work program, shall be consolidated with the City's Comprehensive Plan update work program and will be subject to Steps 3 through 7 as stated below. 3. Staff Report, Spokane Valley Planning Staff will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission, The report shall analyze whether each proposal included in the work program meets the amendment criteria included in this application and, if so, hove' it meets those criteria. All application documents and staff reports shall be available for public review. 4, Planning Commission Public Hearing, The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each ind vidual proposed amendment. PL-15 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 *Ian COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED At1I1ENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION C'rlrlur und'rr of OppQi urlarp 5, City Council Review and Decision. The City Council shall review the Planning Commission's recommendation and will then adopt the recommendation or amend it. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern W'ashunggton Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, pursuant fo RC'N 36.7OA.29O(2) 7, Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Lori Barlow, Senior Planner (LbarlawA spokanevalle .00rq). PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE PLANNING(DIVISION SHALL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED A. For map amendments: ❑ Completed Application Form ❑ SEPA Checklist: One copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SERA) Environmental Checkhist, including optional Non-Project Action supplemental form. (Note: Any previous environmental[lonumerits that are relevant to Ibis project should be included and May be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification (Please note. no not snbrrait the notice of-pub/lc hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses shell be current within 30 days of the Planning Cormmnission public hearing.) ❑ One copy of a narrative describing the following: A - fi F 15 Stale the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria aw: a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public Health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan: c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change In conditions beyond the properly owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject properly lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious trapping error; or e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors. a. The effect upon the physical environment; b, The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. PL,45U7.li Paget 2ar5 S4 imani, 1pCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Commun.".fy of Op er ttoority B. Submit the following for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development regulations, [] Completed Application Form LI One copy of the text proposed to he changed, showing deletions by strittet-hFough and additions by underline. One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, arid the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, sefety, welfare,and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan;, c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject properly lies; d The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses en identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: 312_71204S-- _ Received by: L L vii Fee; PL File ##: I .>l3 PL,48'V1.4 Papa 3 of 5 Jerry Bishop 3704 E Chattaroy Rd Chattaroy Wa. 99003 3127115 Spokane Valley Planning Division Community Development, Planning Division 11707 E Sprague, Suite 106 Spokane Valley Wa. 99206 Dear Spokane Valley Planning Division Staff, I am proposing an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map in order to construct multi- family housing units on my property,which Is currently designated as Offk e. I purchased the property at 8021 E Broadway with the intention of redeveloping the A4 acres into offices. Soon after we purchased the property, a new office development broke ground 112 mile to the west of our property. The new development prompted me to make a more thorough study of the area. It seems to me that there is perhaps already an overabundance of office space nearby. In my opinion there seems a greater need for quality built multi-family housing, We would like to build a nine unit, one bedroom apartment unit on the site. Many current studies have shown that there is a great need for housing for people who live on their own. One bedroom units fill a growing need in communities across the nation. One bedroom units have a lower Impact on surrounding properties than 2 and 3 bedroom units because there are fewer c-ars and people occupying the same space. I've been a landlord for over 20 years and in my experience my one bedroom houses have been the easiest to manage with less maintenance and fewer conflict resolution issues, I do not foresee any negative impact mr the physical environment and itis not near to any Waterway. I believe our proposal for a new,welt built, apartment community would provide an irnpetus for neighbors to upgrade Their properties and serve es a buffer between commercial and single family homes. Broarlway Ave. between i-90 and Argonne is well serviced with regard to schools, shopping,transportation etc,. I believe it is more cost-effective (therefore better maintained)and easier on the environment to provide multi-family housing than single-family housing.Thank you for your time arid consideration. Sincerely, r s, 19f31 1111 i 1I II . Jerry Bishop Property Owner APPLICANT NAME: Brian Chavez and David S. and Geraldine A. King APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0014-0015 PROPERTY OWNER: Brian Chavez and David S. and Geraldine A. King PARCEL No.: 45144.1206 and SITE ADDRESS: 15316 and 15324 E Valleyway Avenue 45144.1210 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Residential (LDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial ( C ) ZONING DESIGNATION: R-4 Single-family Residential Suburban District (R-4) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Community Commercial ( C ) Summary of Request: CAR Applications 2015-0014 and 0015 have been combined for consideration as they are adjacent to one another. The proposal seeks to change the Land Use designation of the parcels on the Comprehensive Plan Map from LDR to C. The zoning would change from R-4 to C. Context: The property located at 15316 E Valleyway Avenue has 80 feet of frontage along Valleyway, is 641 feet deep, and is 1.1 acre. The east and south borders of the southern half of the property lie adjacent to C zoned properties. The east border of the northern half and the entire west border of the property lie adjacent to R-4 zoning. North of Valleyway the parcel lies across from both Multi-family Medium Density Residential (MF-1) and Garden Office (GO) zoning. The property has been developed with a single-family residence. Single-family residences are located east and west of the parcel on the northern portion. Sullivan Scoreboard Tavern and an outside RV storage business lie adjacent to the parcel along the south half. The property located at 15324 E Valleyway Avenue has 96 feet of frontage along Valleyway, is 320 feet deep, and is .7 acres. The east and south borders of the property lie adjacent to C zoned properties. The west border of the property lies adjacent to R-4 zoning. North of Valleyway the parcel lies across from both MF-1 and GO zoning. The property has been developed with a single-family residence. A single-family residence is located west of the parcel. Pizza Hut, Mister Car Wash, and Wendy's are located adjacent to the east boundary of the site along Sullivan Road. Sullivan Scoreboard Tavern lies adjacent to the parcel along the south boundary. Both properties are between 350 and 400 feet west of the intersection of Valleyway Avenue and Sullivan Road. Sullivan Road is a Principal Arterial roadway while Valleyway Avenue is a local access street. Principal arterials serve the major centers of activity and include the highest volumes of traffic. An RV storage facility exists on the parcel located adjacent and to the west of these parcels. The RV Storage is a legal nonconforming use established prior to City adoption of the current zoning map in 2007. Implications: The rezone of the parcel to Community Commercial would allow a broader range of uses including retail, light industrial and office uses. Impacts to the properties may not occur until the current residential uses transition to a commercial use, should the property be redeveloped under the C zoning designation. The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones. CAR-2015-0015—Staff Analysis Page 1. R-4 and C Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front Yard Rard* Side Yard* Garage R-4 35 ft. 55% 50 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 20 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. C 35 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 20 ft. 20 t. N/A *If adjacent to residential use or zone Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application does not appear to align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the Economic Opportunity theme identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if C is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of C zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less C zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if C is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Map showing requested change B. Aerial Map of subject property C. Current Comprehensive Plan map CAR-2015-0015—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map LiLaim kikStudy Area IIII Riverside I !il ,, A U pp al_ I.. 1 .... ., CAR 15-0014, 15-0015 Request: Applicant: Brian Chavez Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to j]Oilll� David& Geraldine King C;subsequent Rezone from R-4 to C Wal ley` Parcel#: 45144.1206, 45144.1210 Address: 15316/15324 E Valleyway Zoning Map ,11, or Valleyway —_— -- ___ ___ ____ ____ _ Study Area Riverside _ -= =•••—=—= =-_ — — _ • ,, •,, ,_...•• . =,,= ==''' =••• =.. 4 1 CAR 15-0014, 15-0015 Request: �'�, Applicant: Brian Chavez Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to Spokane David& Geraldine King C;subsequent Rezone from R-4 to C Walley Parcel#: 45144.1206, .1210 Address: 15316/15324 E Valleyway I M , ' .. { , V.: - wr - 10 vegairram ..„ifil .. r u' w _ 1.1 .._ ill 1111 . r IL .01 .iiimmi. _ i4 ill' I � tii �Iro I AP ix1t Sp 44 y t Study Area r ■r rPOIix * it 1 1116, - # �1 rt 1111111110 , ' .1 ' 1 Y aU ?. 6 Y1 m -,11) -L-__ -'. T i lik-'ii. .r 11111.111 GM sou dig �,a WI, illI. Fit R i.. mks rel . � *. _ .... .-.- ,,,, TPM 131f 111111111111ntw , CAR 15-0014,15-0015 Request: Spokane Applicant: Brian Chavez Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from LDR to David& Geraldine King C;subsequent Rezone from R-4 to C Walley Parcel#: 45144.1206, .1210 Address: 15316/15324 E Valleyway cm IT dcan0014.41ftwa COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION co muntlyofOppomrriary PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION L Map amendment; or jJ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: II �f C 42. MAILING ADDRESS: . Cry I 110 r CITY: 5 1 o Afu I f/ li STATE: OA ZIP: o 7 -24150 tf' 2yrTO l ehcv e 3 P Fey , /216 PHONE FAx CELL: EMAIL: - PROPERTY OWNER: 1Z1 M 14,wE MAILING ADDRESS: , 0 , r CJ c3 2. CITY: I�WId �I STATE:ZA4 ZIP: C7919 3 17 f~ 2 v' v „,. ►i"riFI '' 6(4 PRONE ¶'J 1 4-7 FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: 1 / r 1 / T f/ fh{ PARCEL No.: Y6794/172°6'r/ 2+' 6' COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: i rt L D PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN aESIGNATIC}N: ZONING DESIGNATION: l - PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): 0101._L-RECEIVED MAR 272015 CSV PERMIT CENTER PL ASVI.4 SUB # r J REV. # :gep uf6 I . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION 'omM urthty of Oppar-rwrrfty PART III AUTHORIZATION Signature of legal owner or applicant) I, 5 1Z( td { } TI [�+�t (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are mace truthfully-and to the best of my knowledge. - (:?;61:1ure) (Date) PL-a&VIA Pap§aft Part 1 Required Material 1_ Reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. Request to change zoning of Parcel 45144.1206 From R4 to C (Commercial). How does the proposed amendment meet the approved criteria? 2a. The Parcel (45144.1206) physical dimensions of the property do not lend it to R4 Residential development. This parcel is narrow at + 80.5' and deep + 650'. Also, the southern half abuts Parcel (4514 1.1216) Scoreboard Tavern. This impacts the parcel as it's not conductive to Residential development due to potential noise, traffic, light, associatedwith a tavern. Residential development would result in numerous and ongoing complaints such as noise, fights, arguments and general tavern problems. These would result in significant issues involving law enforcement officers and city officials. Which would lead to increased costs to City of Spokane Valley. The proposed amendment would provide transition space between Residential development and commercial development. Separation will also be provided from the tavern property affecting public health, safety and welfare. c. There has been an ownership change for Parcel 4.1206. The new owner would like to make development, but it's difficult and limited under R4. The previous owner-which also owns the tavern Parcel (4.1216) had no interest or intent to develop. 3d. By changing the designation from R4 to C. therewouId.be a reduction-- 1 of -eductic — of potential impact to schools. D , r��ec:t RECEIVED MAR 7 7 2015 CSV PERMIT CENTER U RJ4tr[ REV. if ti I - 1 11 . 7 _ O 70 i 75 75 95 0 70i. -.- — - - A , , { + 2 I � 4 da rti iv. 1 p I Z Z A I- 4.1214 0 � . . . pi 5uiii fiWI 9741207 I "? SI 1 41309 4. 1210 . . i'` - . 16 ga . C1uihila ,91x05 - 41221 ` "' ry 9 .., a 97 tiav T1/4./ .. 41208 41208 ...4 )11.1,6,1' B 4.3106 ,.%. • 1 6.61 , f3116 11 7�� ..- • • . 0, .., . • ,. .,N.4.3-11 A i `-- l..� u 5c.oRcAppic Pk a . 75 4 3,13 . _ I4.1216 13 r r�..,j e ct u_ =-T i RECEI ' ;; , D ,9 , y 7- 71-). 1 •115 kr, 20S P( (Ai 1/1441 R.ck 1 k CSV PERMIT ENTER if .kt,- ...4 , sue > Fl V. ,,, r fl 1 4.3119 i Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: VERONA SOUTHERN APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0016 PROPERTY OWNER: Southern Family LLC, P.O. Box 205, Greenacres, WA 99016 SITE ADDRESS: Site is located approximately PARCEL No.(s): 55173.2801, 55173.2802, 300' south of the intersection of Barker and 55173.2803, 55173.2804, 55173.2805, Appleway Avenue, and includes the following 55173.2806, 55173.2807, 55173.2808, addresses: 18706, 18710, 18714, 18717,18720, 55173.2909, 55173.2908, 55173.2907, 18723,18726, 18801, 18804. 18807, 18808, 55173.2706, 55173.2705, 55173.2704, 18809, 18810, 18811, 18812, 18813 E. 55173.2703, 55173.2702, 55173.2701 (All Lots Valleyway Court, and 202 N. Barker Road. located within Southern's Mobile Park Addition) CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Multi-family Residential (MDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Multifamily Residential (HDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-1, Multifamily Medium Density Residential (MF-1) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-2, Multifamily High Density Residential (MF-2) Summary of Request: The proposal is a Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment request to change the land use designation from MDR to HDR and subsequent rezone from MF-1 to MF-2. Context: The total area of the 17 parcels located within Southern's Mobile Park Addition is 3.55 acres. Parcels range in size from 5,865 square feet up to 13,990 square feet. The average parcel is —9100 square feet. All lots are developed with a manufactured home, landscaping, and accessory structures. Access to the lots is from Valleyway. Valleyway is an improved public street that ends in a cul-de-sac. The site is located approximately 300' from the intersection of Barker and Appleway. Appleway is a Principal Arterial and Barker is a Minor Arterial. The surrounding land use designations include MDR to the west, Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) and MDR to the North, Low Density Residential (LDR)to the East, and HDR to the South. The majority of the land uses are single family residential, although the uses at the intersection of Barker and Appleway include a church, two gas station/convenience stores and the Greenacres Post Office. In 1996 the subject property, along with a 5 acre piece to the south, was rezoned UR-22 by land use action ZE-43-96. This was a privately initiated rezone heard by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. In 2006 the subject property was designated MDR under the City's Comprehensive Plan, and subsequently rezoned to MF-1. Implications: A rezone of the parcels to MF-2 would allow for an increase in density if the property were redeveloped from 12 units per acre, up to 22 units per acre. Additional uses allowed in the HDR designation include transitional housing, and professional schools (vocational or trade schools), while other uses stay the same. Generally MDR is used as a transitional zone between higher intensity uses, such as commercial and office land uses, and single family neighborhoods; the HDR is used similarly to transition from the high intensity land uses to medium and lower density single family neighborhoods. Relational height CAR 2015-0016—Staff Analysis Page 1 standards are the same for both zoning districts when multifamily development is proposed next to single family development. Multifamily open space standards are the same in each district. Impacts to the site resulting from existing traffic at the intersection of Barker and Appleway are not expected to change. The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones MF-1 and MF-2 Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front Yard Rear Yard Side Yard Garage MF-1 40 ft. 60% 45 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. MF-2 50 ft. 65% 20 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 20 ft. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the multi-family zone specific focus area identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the housing public input theme identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if HDR is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of multi-family zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less HDR zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if HDR is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Zoning Map B. Aerial Map of subject property C. Comprehensive Plan Map D. Application Materials E. Site Photos F. Comments CAR 2015-0016—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map N:Nliiii --- 'N'% Z ' ' N N 1 1 IN'N' N 1 1 IC '1 Study Area vo 1 11 j Q Llj 5 Q W ow �� Q VALLE t 11 ,---------'7/ AY Ill 18706E VALLEYWAY CT w� QWcwW� Q>w owJQ> WoJ� Q �>J AVEnZII IIQ > > > . L11 I x0 ADDRESS UNKNOWN ValleywaY o Y o I 7 ZQ W W> W' V> W H H VujW N>- W Nw > 0W >r:t 1,7CO J Q J Q 00 J Q 00 J a -��� Q J J J —Q J J °° �> �> �> > > Q of I I I I I >P 1 1 CAR 15-0016 Request: Applicant: Verona Southern Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to j]Odlle Parcel#: 55173.2701-55173.2909 Vd Address: See Map HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 Zoning Map ,- -..., .,s,,,,,,,,,, ,..4,,,,,,„ ,,,,, ,,,,,,,,i,,,,li ,,,..N..-„,„,;,,,......-- Nisioi. 44.01*.N.. 01 ''1 1 1'-‘4,1, --. Li'4.4,„,L .,„.i,.i.siii,.,, *1 �! 14.4%.,...%,..N..._-*NSINNV Arbor St dy Area 11 i _,_ 41 gill Q. 18811E Qe w wPIA- w !/%4Iaz UALLEYWAY w � w > 18706Q it 't- ›- c �.Q Dtea UAYWAY 6Ti J-Q J a 141 _ a > > Nz LU 1 0o x 0 ADDRESS o z UNKNOWN ValleywaY o } } 4. U U ca Q w = H}� JEcce EI wQw � v w wa, � CcD I �*`I� LU a � J'a COJ J a � 11111 IIIL 111 P CAR 15-0016 Request: Applicant: Verona Southern Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 55173.2701-55173.2909 'al leyAddress: See Map HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 - rirli--, N., ., 4! .,, ,s:L,.......:........e:10 4, aye \e� P4� 1 • ilio te °At° 1 4 ' ' lblifillIE k higli mi Alp° 111 it 1 11 `* ; ,, i Study Area I , _ ,,, 111. 1‘6- I r . IL 4 ,,,ii I ad ,L111. } im a 18811E ^.� W 0:- > VALLEaYWAYEl4 rt AVE '' 1 II 18706 Qi . E I < a � > 'AV VALLEYWAYO _ a � Nz + 0 ADDRESS *� ,,o z UNKNOWN da1teyWaY �' a z lir E CY d� w'� d�']hatt ci --• 4. ii. � w � W Q �4 ' A O(� w o. �Q(�1w�`.I1 co ce 71WL> RW4 P c0W cow y, P t1 Q J a J V� J _ J ' r. iii iii J • , Milk 111 I • CAR 15-0016 Request: Applicant: Verona Southern Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 55173.2701-55173.2909 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 . Walley Address: See Map *lane Valley COMPREHENISVE PLAN AMENDMENTAPPLICATION STAFF USE ONLY 2 Date Submitted: ?)/11.111 6 Received by: /2Feed PLUS#: File#: l '4' RECEIVED MAR 2t15 PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION PlabY tlAl.'t�tmalll rll _ Map Amendment.; or D Text Amendment _— APPLICANT NAME:VERONA SOUTHERN MAILING ADDRESS:PO BOX 205 CITY: SPOKANE VALLEY STATE:WA Zip: 99015 PHONE: 509-924-8138 FAX: CELL; EMAIL; bevre©grnail.com PROPERTY OWNER:VERONA SOUTHERN MAILING ADDRESS: PO BOX 205 CITY: SPOKANE VALLEY STATE:WA ZIP:99016 CELL:509-993- PHONE:50-921-B138 FAX: 6014 EMAIL: PARCEL No.: Lots 1-9,BIk1 &Lots 1-8 SITE ADDRESS: Southern's Mobile Park Md. LPO981A BIk2,ot Southern's Mobile Park Add. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Multifamily Residential PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Multifamily Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: MT-1 PROPOSED ZUNING DESIGNATION: M F-2 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attached full explanation on separate sheet of paper). I am requesting a Comprehensive Plan: Map Amendment to restore rnnv proe ty to its previous High Durisi ult mil 7iflint MF-2 whi f 7 �k � • s , . Kra ' , 1i , • • ,_ y _•. PL-06 V1.0 Page 3 of 4 S'Ifl'I'4 #001‘... COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE �l� CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT RECCU'EST APPLICATION C'onowauriry olOppor►unify PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. (Signature) (Date) PL-4g V1.0 Page 5 of 5 4 SC I MAP `-- 1 ,5113_ `` 5s3 -�_ ,, 55173.2001 \ 3` 0021 1 I 55122 f �d " 55173.2546 - '' ''''' l - - A-ria-0-1_CI•- -- '`n, 9 55173.2647 i ,r ] ,� 55173.2505 551.842301 1r _.--) \ Zit !I L'.:.J r.,.,,, 55173-1221 ...--- Jo y;,,, li F. S----- i _ 55173.2501 ti 16 us P`� - I -`� 50 -� � _ , -,, 55173.1222 f 551843501 I — oEl i ; • $ c 55173.2801 ] n i 2 R 74 I ` '' V. I p Le ' 55113.1227 t1 w op a 5514,3547 II M. —-` - t , 1 4Fy 26 55113. x12 __ -4..-. 1 Pp-KA 1� ALLY •,..< 1 , t,+ 1 , , `55173.2908 .1f°,-` 1 - w I I 55173.1225 I 55184.3506 1 11 55173.280 i _ l 0 11 CO ' K 11 I I - M I °°� II�w 55173.2900 E- - - 1 I Ln f 55173.2804 _ —.i m 1 55173,1226IF6 1 xi 1 55173.14710 Ia - - 55173/019 I �m i xo n_Av-. 55014.9004 1 I _ - r 55173.1501 I l 214.5 0 107.39 214.6 Feet0 irks map ra a user generated deli i utput from an Inlemet wrapping till=and is for reference only.Data layers that appear on 1115mm mayor may rnol ba aCwraLe.au:rani.or otherwise reliiabe. RECEIVED . tt PA r i:# l'�irJ41N/Y 1:'v 1 1rrm- 1. 1 am requesting a Comprehensive Map amendment to restore my property to its previous density zoning allowing for 22 units per acre, the current MF2 zoning. The property involved, identified as Southern Park MHP CLP0981A}, along with the adjoining 5 acre parcel (;5173:11019}, were rezoned to UR 22 in 1996. These two properties were rezoned as a single project and a site plan was approved. All required UR 22 applications and Environmental documents were submitted, approved and paid for; resulting in the high density OR 22 zoning. (Documents are attached) When the current Comprehensive Map was approved, it reduced a portion of my property to its current use of 11 units per acre (MF 1 zoning), disregarding my paid and permitted rezone. Due to the location of my property and its accessibility to the freeway,Appleway corridor and City of Liberty Lake, my intention has always been to develop this property to its idlest density in conjunction with the adjoining acreage. It has never been my intent to leave this area in its current use, which is why I spent time and considerable money to rezone it in 1996. The location of my property to access the freeway, Appleway Aye,future transit lines or light rail go hand in hand with a high density zoning that allows for compatibility with the transition and development of this land to its best use in the future. 2. a. Granting the MFF-2 back to this property would prevent deterioration of the area by providing an area for compatible development along the growth corridor. b. MF-2 allows for high density deveioproentalmig major transportation and business corridors; providing a transition area of services and high density, affordable housing,and preventing sprawl. c. Property was reduced to a lessor density than the owner has been approved for without consent of owner. d.This corrects an error or oversight of the Comprehensive Plan, by restoring the Mff-2 zoning density which was previously acquired and permitted. e. N/A 3. a, There would be little to no effect on the current physical environment.There is mixed use currently In the area....church, Post Office,gas stations, rentals. b. N/A c. Rezoning this area MF-2 is compatible with the adjacent parcel (55173.107.9) zoning of MF-2, providing a buffer zone between businesses and single family homes,a transition space which this area of the N Barker Rd does not currently have. d Major transit areas are already in place and being developed for this location. (I-91J freeway, Barker RD improvements, transit lines and possible light rail) Facilities and schools are being addressed as the area continues to develop to the south of E.Sprague Ave. e.The benefit would be to address deteriorating areas and provide a high density buffer zone along transportation and economic corridors. f.This area is a rapidly transitioning area.The proximity to the city of Liberty Lake's mixed use borders, closeness to the freeway and transit hubs makes this an ideal area for a higher density zoning to allow for compatibility of development as the future growth unf'ds. g.As the City of Spokane Valley grows there will continue to be a need for high density development. h.This meets many of the goals of the GMA: to reduce sprawl by filling in areas with multifamily, affordable housing, and to concentrate urban development and economic growth along the established transportation lines. w OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER. 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260E-0170 (509) 456-3600 Fax 329-3478 "ENGINEER' S CONVITIONSL OF APPROVAL" -ZONE TO: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering s Roads DATE : 1/14/97 PROJECT: UR-7 & UR-3.5 to UR-22 Reillo Retirement Cctr 110 Dhic7 L.l V ED FILE #: ZE-43-'96 / (0RZE-216-96) an Hearing/Review Date: 01/22/1997 10 :30 #2 Sponsor/Applicant: Dwight Hume Verona Southern] ' ,, j��jj Section Township Range: 17-25-45 fChh lliY a viJrj NT Planner: Steve Davenport/TAMMY JONES Design/Review Date: September 5, 1996 q 2 :15) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1 . Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first : 2. Applicant shall dedicate 9 feet on X for right of way. 3 . Access permits for approaches to the County Road system shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 4 . Applicant s'-hall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. S. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard: 0 d engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County r, Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles . 6 . The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. CC: Applicant Dwighe Rkime Otecona southern)) Entglneer/Sarveyc r Leff R Willey Page .? { one/1997 2E-9 -46 9epcember 50 1996 DAZE-216-96 7 . The County Engineer has designated a Special Minor Arterial Roadway Section for the improvement of Barker Road which is adjacent to the proposed development . This will require the addition of asphalt equaling 32 feet along the frontage of the development . This widening shall be done in conj--.nction with the first phase of the proposal. No Curbing and sidewalk shall be constructed at this time. The applicant shall execute an RID/CRP Agreement fur the curbing and sidewalk. s . All required improvements shall conform co the current state of wash_ngten Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stcrmwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 9 . The applicant shall file a petition for the vacation of the following street or alley Valley Way Court . 10 . Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 11 . No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public read right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 12 . All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or ii-.prcverrnente shall be filed with the County Engineer. 13 , The County Arterial Road plan identifies Barker Road as a 100 foot Principal Arterial . The existing right of way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in The a/an. In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 11 feet in width alone the Barker Road frontage be set aside in reserve. This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements . are made to Barker Road. A 14 , The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities . The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 15 . The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane. County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards . e J REEJVED 1 4 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER 14Aii ,3 r) /U15 P( 10 i � In [he Matter Concerning ZE-43-'�6;Zone Reclassification } �t Cts , from Urban Residential-7 (La-7) and Urban Residential- ) NOTICE OF CLIM iJI1 r 1N' 1.161 T 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) } PUBLIC HEARING Applicant: Verona Southern ) TO: All it terestec persons, and property owners and Iaxplyers within 400 feet of proposal, as Listed on Spokane County Assessor's records. YOU ARE HEREBY NOTFF 1 f3D THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE IIELD ON THE ABOVE- REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW: Bearing Date: January 22, 1997 Time: 10:30 a.m. Place: COM missioiters Assembly Roane, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Wo:ks Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.. Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Rsirtertial-7 -7}and Urban Residential-3.5 (LIR-1.5) to Urban Residential-22 (LR-22) on approximately 7.5 acres Ibr a 110 unit retirement center. ApplicnntiOw'ncr: Verona Southern P.O. Box 205 Greenacres, WA. 39.016 (509) 928-4128 Owner's Designated Cucrtact: Dwight Hume 107 S. Howard, Suite 325 Spokane, WA. 99204 (509)456-7402 istrcntirara: Generally located east o113arkel. load, south of LaBerry Drive in the SW % of Section 17. Township 25 N., Range 45 E,W.M., Spokane C'onnty,Washington. Z riing: Urban Resid :n1ial-7 ((JR. 7) and Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5). Comprehensive Plan: Urban, Environmental Determination (SEPA): A Determination of Nonsignificance has been issuedThe Div.isiorw o eBIIIItiing and Planning i [lip !cad agency. The official comment period ends January 20, 1997. Related Permits Not Included in Application: None. Division or Building& Planning Stuff Persou: Tammy.Jones; Planner 1I 509-456-2205 DETERMINATION OF N11NSlCtwIFFCANCl - "DNS" SPOI(ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNiNC RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL,JAMES L.IwIANSON,DIRECTOR WAC 197.11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) SPOKCANF ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-43-96 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclnssificn'ion from Urban Residential-7{UR-7) and Urban Residential-3-5(UR-3.5)to Urban Residential-22(LiR-22)on approximately 73 acres for a 110 unit retirement center. APPLICANT: Verona Southern P.O. Box 205 Greenaeres,WA. 99016 (5t )928-4128 Owner's Designhied Cuntact: Dwight Benne 107 S.Howard,Suite 325 Spokane, WA. 99204 (509)456-7402 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located east°Ml3arker Road,south ofLaBerry Drive in the S+ 'A of Section 17,Township 25 N.,Range 45 E.W.1Mi,.Spokane County,Washington, LEAD AGENCY: ,SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not lave a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (MS)is not rerttrirer irnder RCW 113.21 C,030{2X4), This decision was made after review of a completed environmental ehecklisl and other information on file with the lead agency. This iisformatiott is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-S40(2);the lead agency will not act on this proposal for . al least 15 days from the date issued(below). Comments regarding this DNS must he snhniitted no later-thtrn 4:410 p.m.,January 20,1997, if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should he sent to the contact person listed below. 11th####i 04#4110 #0140101,00#41# l #00.414#N#### #til#fffl i NOthri#if# By: Tammy Jones Title: Planner Il V. Phone! {509)456-2205 - Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning(MS-P) West 1026 Broadway Spokane,WA 99260 ' DATE ISSUED: lr ,74__. , 1997 SIGNATURE: brit- L A *LI COMM NTS RECAP OINO ENIVII CCNMEltiTAL CONCERNS ARE WELCOME AT THE I.1E4RING. • oOrMii F ti/i # #{04 } 4 t## ,1i>'r # #tri{10004 1WOMIMPN ONr# APPEAL OF THIS DISTERMiNATION,alter it becomes Fina],may be made to the '4• SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OP PULLDING AND PLANTIING,(h1S-P). 1st Floor,West 1026 Broadway,Spokane,WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same-es the above project's appeal deadline.being ten(10)calendar days after the signing of the!decision to approve or cl isalspi-ove the project. This appeal must be written and the appel lard choroid be prepared to make specific Factual objections Comae the Division aF Building and Planning to assist you ,57 with the specificsfor n SPA appeal. iigNigiiitfi#####1111001111 f1 -01011111104#6411 $r"fr' 110 J#til rd1Hiti ffi iNfif+14411i #i ANii ght4 This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology(Olympia) 2. Spokane County Division of Engineering;Pal Harper X43. Spokane County Division of Utilities;Jim Red 9F , `4.. Spokane County Health District;Steve I-IoIderby 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6. Spokane County Division of Parks,Recreation and Fair,Wyn Birkenthal 7. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Steve Worley S. Spokane County Boundary Review Boatel 9, Spokane Regional Transportation Council 10. Spokane Transit Authority 11, WA State Department of Transportation 12, Fire Protection❑islriet No. t 13. Central Valley School District No. 356 lit. Consolidated Irrigation District. ,ie,,,\M Zoning map 661gA-601 q `' � . ` , v ' i a i�� 5173. - % 55184.0812 `�ti � i � rt 7 . r _-� - 1ti ,� '', _-,s -.13 • �. , $!Doris -- ''''''',.C.N,r ' ,i/c \ r-----——-- _ x '-fes• ? -$.9 1'\\44A7i °15. 1 55173.2667 \ _ --P171--..----- . `� '� `,. ��_ X52 rya 1 k • '91 ' "NN ii",., ,,,...-P Li., '4..?.? \ V. ',--.. ,,,,'*? 10 lk a Y _rr Ib. 0e�day.Cts 4 r., i n ra o 55184 3506 *a' ', .;;-- r,„, L lila : LI,.--.- 1 1 F-- 1 ------ -IV 0 170'11'i. ,:. Lr' ,y 55113:1420 i",+ es 1 i._ .55184,9044 w ,. , , -„, , , .,„,0 55173:1019 ir ' Y €l ,, •' ur 551$4.9175 " ; • w w} 55171E18 -,..,- D. IIII t.o MI 'r' l j ,� S 1. l 111 D. 55124.9032 $p,- _ o `� 55173.iO4S R_3 i to I .�." I A 117 — ` �r 55184•NIS$ I anI. gfaue_ASr.�� itaSM.eiii i l � l LLIIIL{ fG T�`\�i+i•fli� � 454.$ C 225.39 4502,Feet 12, tt C'1i,,,E 30 2015 p I This ms is a usergenerated slallc Cul ul from al Internet met ma pirr she arld is far reference an .Data!aSP K',TF VALLEY A' P mapping ly yore that appear pR this m&p may cc may net be aCtur�k,wr cnk Cif atl rcrw sc Er,'R I M 4Y i0 E. reliable. E E1V D . zEIiih 30 2[115.43-9 „ ,.111-:.'..11- '."1 t. rN i I - _._ -_sL.. '__ - vw- www,-! ” •• ' Mr s . -- tL --- ,.•, t • 1 I es• ., r l_DS r. L • ,—•• -* -.i;ifmrI. '1.1 HIGHWAY i - f -r. I FRE WAY 1 ■ - -,..-i,e) _ _ _ ;________„__,,,,. . ig jç4) '*.. . ■.111.00..4 .b1 IP Z {Li f4� _ti fi .7 ii y .0..F.,:, AK1 '.' , . _. ,,,..._E'''r ‘,4 A i a• 7 O+. I OF I .. r I .i .Y""&" lc''."i� { V ; ;� te r. tam • i )- •.tr} MirM . Irf ydR tom, " .....� '' r .,r- y a.' C. .. "'"1'"1 •w n , ,e - ',bn .; ri.. 6 Tiim,• 4', 1 - ,. 6 3 3 SPRAGU `.....1., .!L_r,7-.--, ..-:-.T.-r4.}r'!4,-,...:-.2.a!6 ..L! E/�'. ..Lf•i.a•r artwura.1.0 M.1+fr if WV" rs:il,I. s - _5.r1 I a` yR F dr a .0 i •1140 „ . � a • ar'e h,d;; 5 1 ft w a ::i *LAT a 1 'V m FouR71i • AVE.. ' c &s.... ..raw...a.r..o-rwss.....,r.,-..r�u-�,.e.4s,•. _M •.. .r...R.., i ::. ..., ,`.ter. I $ 14 L , EIGHTH FIVEI-, ' .11 PC Y r . _. I-22-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-43-96 Page 1 A E.43- , ___ _ ..I. '-• -- It - ',,....kililliMI.2 . 1a ! =d11E: .�. `- F e, Lfi., .; ,-.. . j, P. ,may, : ` *- . i. -lair. 111 8-3. II-,. M.r+ +.•.�IAFlfMi/M.aM.MMSiirr.i vM1 i L I`� J5iY4Aiti rl Yn. ti-y.P�r .-.... _ 4 .+ l i I r,r 0.1.4 ...w...,,,,eye• ....,.....-.....i 1113114,30 • ` F �l9ii 1' a .r" ' 7 ie,,...,,--� ,.+' ,,...fr".! N. + 1 -1110 .I : }, t r Y u[_ My L 1 NI • ._ 6'3. W- _ _ -.UR!' . , r, .* I . "rrrw`ht Ic ,.M yV; -•I•-� 22 '4,'m z O SPS¢ u s � ti .._:- 'r sac•:44ew•._arra...u2a a r4 .".Are-„N.w...m..u....,*..n.. .--.--— lit - 0 +*: a—@.d 4 A . E, • Ids rit' . RIM - *URfi " ai. 1 h FVUgeTM AVE.. ! r Ot I a . r,rAvF€w t • EA I 4 E 151-11 1-1. ACJ E _ r. .. _. == --- rt .11 - 6 h •1 i S 4. • _ i CA 4f o 11/4:::,....:*'4\ 1 -j ��,_ t 1-22-97 HE Staff Report for ZE-43-96 Page 2 Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: McFreeze Corporation APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0017 John and Roberta McCollum PROPERTY OWNER: McFreeze Corporation, John and Roberta McCollum SITE ADDRESS: 807 N Argonne Road PARCEL No.: 45181.1314 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Office (0) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) ZONING DESIGNATION: Garden Office (GO) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) Summary of Request: The proposal seeks to change the land use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map for 807 N Argonne Rd from 0 to NC, resulting in a re-zone from GO to NC. Context: The property is 34,330 square feet in area (0.79 acres)and has been developed as the Shear Illusions Hair Salon with parking and landscaping. The property is situated on the northwest corner of Broadway Avenue and Argonne Road. Surrounding uses include a massage therapy business to the north, Starbucks Coffee and a strip shopping center to the east, Argonne Terrace Apartments to the south, and a single family residence and an office to the west. Surrounding parcel land use designations include 0 to the immediate west, north and east (across N. Argonne Road), and high density residential situated to the south (across Broadway Avenue). The Argonne/Mullan Road couplet extends north and south and creates a commercial/office corridor extending from south of Sprague Avenue to north of the interstate. Office and commercial uses have developed along this corridor. Office zoning has been established between Argonne and Mullan from Sprague up to Boone Avenue. GO zoning has been established along the edges, east and west of the 0 zoning along this corridor, with some pockets of high density multi-family. The Shear Illusions Hair Salon is a permitted use in both the GO and NC zones. The Argonne/Mullan Road couplet is located adjacent to the property extending north and south. The couplet is identified as a Principal Arterial. Principal arterials serve the major centers of activity and include the highest volumes of traffic. The parcel also lies on Broadway Avenue which is identified as a Minor Arterial in the City's Arterial Street Plan. Minor arterials accommodate trips of moderate length at a lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. They may carry local bus routes and provide intra- community continuity, but ideally they do not penetrate neighborhoods. Implications: A rezone of the parcel to NC would allow a broader range of retail uses. The NC Zone designates areas for retail and office uses serving small-scale neighborhoods. Neighborhood business areas should be smaller and should be located as business clusters rather than arterial strip commercial developments. Since the parcel is currently developed with a hair salon, a change in designation to the parcel would not impact the current use. The adjacent residential use would not experience any impacts beyond what has already occurred unless the subject parcel is redeveloped. If the property were to redevelop, the structure will have lower building heights with the same setbacks and development requirements. CAR-2015-0017—Staff Analysis Page 1. The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones. GO and NC Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Height Coverage Width Depth Front/Flanking Rear Yard Side Garage Yard Yard GO 45 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 20 ft.* 20 ft.* N/A NC 35 ft. N/A N/A N/A 20 ft. 20 ft.* 20 ft.* N/A *Adjacent to a residential use or zone Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application does not appear to align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application does not appear to align with the public input themes identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if NC is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of NC zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less NC zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if NC is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential re-zone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property CAR-2015-0017—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map .*-- ..-•. '''' ''''- .-. -- ..;--.- ----- - ---'-- ----.-.•------.... ------- ---- - --''.------ .-- '-'---'-' ''' ---- -------'' '..-'--------------- .-‘ --- --- --.------------ -- -----.--- ------- ...--..-- -- -------'-' -'-- '.--'-'-.. .- * .- -'. -- '''-''' ' -- -- '. ------.-' .--- ''' --'-- -.- --- -‘•-• -•-•- •- •-*--.-----. ..----.--...--- ----. -- ' ''. ..-".--'.:---'''''-' -. -. Study Area .--.......A IT... -. ', ',,0.,,„.-•-,""."-*:•••X.0..„...--"'`..',,,./---, ,, - `- '''' '..•''''' ---;, 0 Broadway CAR 15-0017 Request: Applicant: McFreeze Corporation Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to Spokane Parcel#: 45181.1314 Val ley' Address: 807 NArgonne Ave NC;subsequent Rezone from GO to NC Zoning Map t ,.-',. ... ..,._ ,,,, '", , . ,,,,, v,,,,.,,,,,,,-, .. , -, -, .,,, _,,,,, ,,,,-, ,, ,,,, , , ,,,-,. ,,,,..,,,, ,, , ,,,,2 , 1,,:,- •'- ..'' -.'7 Stura .,,,,.7 _ ..'# _ ':-_ -> 0 Broadway CAR 15-0017 Request: Applicant: McFreeze Corporation Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to Spokane Parcel#: 45181.1314 VaI ley Address: 807 NArgonne Ave NC;subsequent Rezone from GO to NC i i ,, , 1 .1 I. I 011i4.71111.11 e- l M in i. . on. : : Pi Study Area r7 j 1111 1111111111 , , 11111 ! 4 !_ -- i 'Fr, ' 1 0 r-711 A IIIIIIIIIIMIIII 1_41 _villit. _ _44, r ''=` 2 1161111@l11114.1111Y11.Ir'AMMIIIE- 13cud w.,/ MEI IlL , iil , i``` I r. alig 1 11 , ,, ,. . 11 i , _ ___ . Ism .. _ . \ _ ... p, 403-1 . , rip, , __. .. _, , . Rum Ere, .., _ ___ _ __ . _ _ _ _ . ,, _ , ,,. _ CAR 15-0017 Request: Applicant: McFreeze Corporation Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to Spokane Parcel#: 45181.1314 NC;subsequent Rezone from GO to NC .....Valley Address: 807 NArgonne Ave *Winne dostOliaiCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ley CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUESTAPPLICATION Carrtrri irnrtj'rf Oppoi fury r) PART II — APPLICATION INFORMATION Map amendment; or ❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: +t 4 ( f `-Ttcr' ) iV1' .' 0 ;'LC co IL MAILING ADDRESS: So q 1\1 , L .,,,,: 50Krig,4 1I ALL 1 TATE: zw: z 12_ PHONE: V FAX: 50. : °) I EJ. yi,f CS 1,1 C� I PROPERTY OWNER: ML F co RP* l/ KN) x154 ;' ) - ót dh MAILING ADDRESS: 1 4 RE ' 006 6j CITY: g)()K STATE' ti ZIP: Cief 2.0 PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: CC1 J"r;' ii'rll`; SITE ADDRESS: 609 }Zfefi € f`` PARCEL NO.; 4 5 3 1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: O F F l G PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:: ZONING DESIGNATION: i V t r E PROPOSED.ZONING DESIGNATION: l i€ h6o l { omarZC k U BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FCJR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): '5 ea F 4th ,-- PL-48 PL-48 V1,O Payh 4 of SliAcme lCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION COMM irirtycfOppori rarity PART III - AUTHORIZATION _ (Signature of legal owner or applicant) F, -)6 VW 1 C-0 1.- LAik`q _ , (hind name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made tru, ly :nd to th best of my knowledge. ( 3 - 2:7- 2 Crc) ig tur=. (Date) 1 PL-48 V1.9 Page 5 of 5 Stamm p COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE.00.1"01411 '"J CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION COmM rtn 'of Opp rturd°. B. Submit the following for text amendlmetitk to the Comprehensive Plan or development regu Iations: Er Completed Application Form Q One copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by etriket.11-Faugli and additions by underline. El One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environrnent; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36,70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficioncy in the Comprehensive Plan, STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: ti3L Received dy: L i.a t Fee: r,,in PLUS #: File#:. Cly ' .)$t PL-45 V1.9 Page 3 of 5 CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT sary0E-1008*,pREQUE TAI I iLICATIe Valley Community Development- Planning Division Cvr��rritrra� Q O rlauri 11707 E prat Ave Suite 106 f Spokane Valley WA 99206 r' 10 h 509.720.5310 $ Fax: 509.658.0037 + plar+nIng@spokanevatley.org COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. On January 6, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council approved a Public Participation Program (PPP) outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprelieneive Plan update process, As indicated in the PPP, all citizens, neighborhood organizations, or others may submit an application to propose changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, zoning map, or development regulations. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (CARS) and will be evaluated for consideration by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. In order to be considered for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, CARs shall be filed no later than March 31, 2015. Complete CAR applications will be reviewed for inclusion In the Comprehensive Plan update work program, aid will be processed based upon estabiisned criteria as well as the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the proposal. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the CMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the fol#owing actions: • Accept the CAR(s)for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or ▪ Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVIvIC 17.80.100; or a Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. PROCE DUPES 1. Application Period. The application period will commence at the first Comprehensive Plan update public meeting on January 28, 2015 and will close on March 31, 2015. Suemittals received after the deadline shall not be considered. 2. Initial Review. Following the closing of the application period, the City shall review each application to determine whether to include the proposal in the Comprehensive Plan update work program. Staff shall review each application end prepare a report to the Planning Cornmission, which will make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and make a decision on which applications to include in the Comprehensive Plan update work program in May 2015. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA.the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s)for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or ■ Defer the CARO)to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVItIC 17.80.140; or • Deny the CARCO from inclusion 1.1 the Comprehensive Plan update process. The application(s), if included in the work program, shall be consolidated with the City's Comprehensive Plan update work program and will be subject to Steps 3 through 7 as stated below. 3. Staff Report- Spokane Valley Planning Staff will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report shall analyze whether each proposal included in the work program meets the amendment criteria included le this application and, if so, how it meets those criteria. All application documents and staff reports shall be available for public review. 4. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. PL-4B Vill Page 1 of 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION COMP!rnrtr of Op r/anflp 5. City Council Review and Decision. The City Council shall review the Planning Commission's recommendation and will then adopt the recommendation or amend it. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, pursuant to RCUV 35.70A,290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Lori Barlow, Senior Planner (t,berlaw;c spokanevallev+ orq). PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE PLANNING DIV SIC N SHALL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REdUIRt b MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED"- A. For map amendments: ❑ Completed Application Form El SEPA Checklist: One copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including optional Non-Project Action supplemental fo.m. (Note: Any previous environmental documents that are relevant to this project shourdbe included and may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification; (Please note: Do not submit the notice of pubic hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses shall be current wrlirirr 30 days of the Planning Commission public bearing.) ❑ One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. 2, Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below: a The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of ROW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c- The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject properly lies, 1, The proposed amendment corrects en obvious mapping error; or e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3- Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a. The effect upon the physical environment, b. The affect on open space,streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact an adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads public transportation. parks, recreation and schools: B. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; 1. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land: g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. PL-4$V1.0 Page 2 or 5 Citizen-InitwtedAmendment Request. 807 N Argonne RD Parcel#45181.1314 Mardi 27, 2015 Our history of my wife's business Shear Illusions started in June o` 1983 at a converted house in the Spokane Valley at Main and Raymond Rd.We needed to expand and start the first full service salon and clothing boutique. In early 1994 my wife and I and partners at the time John and Marine Freeze purchased the property at 807 N Argonne Rd at that time from Else Richter who had lived there for over 60 years. The condition of the sale was to rezone the property to Bm2 commercial zoning at the time thru Spokane County with rezoning to B2 Commercial with much effort and expense. We were successful in rezoning the properties_We removed a 70 year old the brick house and started construction on our full service salon and clothing boutique built by Columbia Construction. We officially opened May 5, 1995 Shear Illusions Limited the Spokane Valley's first full service salon and clothing boutique employing up to 20 full time people. At this point of time in cur lives my wife and ! are looking to the future of semi retiring after 32 years of service. We were disappointed to learn that our property at 307 N Argonne Rd had been rezoned without our knowledge or any notification, The current zoning of Garden Office does not cover our current retail sales of clothing that was allowed with our B-2. zoning over 21 years ago. Our original zoning Bat part of the comprehensive zoning codes this should have been adopted with the incorporation of the city of Spokane Valley. The subject property is now surrounded by businesses that were not there 21 years ago.We are now buffered 2 buildings deep. Our corner location would best serve the community as a Neighborhood Commercial or higher zoning_ Looking at the Municipal Codes for Permitted Uses such as a drive thru restaurant would serve the local neighborhood and or other permitted future uses and growth. We ask that you would please rezone our property to Neighborhood Commercial District with its more desirable permitted uses than the current Garden Office. This reinstatement would have little to no effect on the physical environment hut would add better services to the local community and added tax benefit to the Spokane Valley economy. This would have no effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes. Our original zoning and requested correction is fully compatible with adjacent lard uses with no negative impact. Subject property is located next to public transportation stop with access to ADA sidewalks and signaled cross walks to neighboring business. With the property location on thecorner of Argonne and Broadway makes an easy and convenient access-For all forms of retail merchandising and retaining employment for the local neighborhood The Argonne- Mullan Rd corridor needs more diverse commercial opportunity s that would also tle in to the Sprague and Appleway business area that would help bring more business and employment to the neighborhood. Please help us with this change. Thank you for your time and consideration. 1 "7/7 Jolh,/and Roberta McCollum Owners Shear Illusions Limited/McFreezeCorporation 807 N Argonne Rd Spokane Valley, WA 99212 Parcel #45181-1314 John's cell 509-$44-29SO Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: CPM Development Corp. APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0018 PROPERTY OWNER: CPM Development Corp. c/o Jana McDonald SITE ADDRESS: Varies PARCEL No.: CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Varies PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: New Designation — Mineral Resource Land Designation Overlay ZONING DESIGNATION: VARIES PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A Summary of Request: The proposal seeks to develop a new chapter within the Comprehensive Plan entitled "Mineral Resource Lands,"that would establish goals and policies to designate, preserve and protect mineral resource lands of long-term commercial significance, with a corresponding map amendment to designate an overlay of Mineral Resource Lands. Context: Currently mining activities are defined in Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) as a heavy industrial use. Mining is a permitted use in the 1-2, Heavy Industrial Zone. While the SVMC does not currently identify a specific mining permit governing mining, there are several chapters of the SVMC that may be applicable to new mining or mineral resource operations and related mining activities. The current Comprehensive Plan does not specifically address mining or mineral resource operations, but does contain several goals and policies for the appropriate development of industrial lands. On April 28, 2015 the City adopted Ordinance No.15-009 establishing a moratorium on mining, mineral product manufacturing, and other related matters. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 15-009, the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update process has been identified as the work plan to work through the policy issues surrounding mining and related mining operations in Spokane Valley. Through the 2015 Comprehensive Plan update process, the City may consider the economic and physical impacts of mining on the City's finite supply of available undeveloped industrial land. RCW 36.70A.170 requires the City to consider designation, where appropriate, of"[m]ineral resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and that have long-term significance for the extraction of minerals." Implications: There are several existing gravel mining operations in the City which take up significant acreage and which have historically resulted in large open pits once the mining use is concluded within Spokane Valley. One of the unique features of mining is the permanent impact on the land where it is sited. Once a mine is opened, the impacts of the mine on the land are usually irreversible even with appropriate reclamation planning. These impacts can mean that the land may be permanently removed from other future available industrial uses, even after the mine closes. CAR-2015-0018—Staff Analysis Page 1. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the mineral resource lands focus area identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the Economic Opportunity public input theme identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if the mineral resource lands zone or overlay is an appropriate designation and will further consider the economic and physical impact of mining on the city's limited supply of available undeveloped industrial lands. Analysis may also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if such an overlay would be compatible with the surrounding uses. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Application CAR-2015-0018—Staff Analysis Page 2 .0,00Valley PLAN UPDATE CJTIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Co+rminfoo of Opyaorne my RECEIVED PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION MAR 1, 1 21' P al i`lel= �A L Map amendment; or E Text amendment + ut,_�:til�lixl�l: i i APPLICANT NAME: CPM deyelcprnent Cog- cfa Jana McDonald MAILING ADDRESS: PO Box 3366 CITY: Spokane STATE:WA ZIP:99220-3366 EMAIL: PHONE: 50S-534-6221 FAX:509-536-3051 CELL: Jrncdonaid©oidcastlematerials.corn PROPERTY OWNER:Same as Applicant - MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: Zip: PHONE: FAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: See attached. PARCEL NO.: See attached. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DaslGNATiow: See attached,. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: New designation: Mineral Resource Land Designation Overlay ZONING DESIGNATION:See attached. PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENIDMENT(atta^h full explanation on separate sheet of paper): See attached text amendment to City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan adding a new chapter entitled`Mineral Resource Lands." A corresponding map amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map isalso_praposed to place an Overlay desiianaticn called 'Mineral Resource Land" or designated Mineral Resource lands. PL-46`V1,ci Page 4 of 5 CC171. , COMPREHENSIVE PLN.i UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION t'r,erJ rno ni fy of O spat Yrori fay PART UI AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) I. 13YIII` '' '] yr , (print narnel swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the beat of my knowledge. z ? 4 -. 30- (SignA re) (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5 of 5 Site 'creage ,IParcelt Current uses zoning Current Zoning Comp Plan Sullivan Road Approx.2242 45123.90108 Mini n industrial I-2 Heavy industrial 45123.9007 Asphalt Production 45122.5045 Concrete Production 45122.9004 Shop Facilities 45123.9036 Recycling 45123.9011 45125.9157 45135,9007 45124.9012 45121.9016 'Spokane County Flora Pit Apprnx.30 45121.9015 Minin• Industrial 1-2 luridr leasef buy LIPti r Shop Facilities Heavy Industrial ;Park Road Approx.10a 35134.9095Mmining Indwstnall-2 Heavy Industrial 35134.9057 QUA tyControl 35134.9022 35134.91075 35134.9030 35134,9029 35134.3232 35134.9021 Carnahan o Approx.34, 35234..0•9 Mining,Recycling MF-1 MCdiu i Density Rexidartilal 8th&Havana quarry Ap,prox,50. 35233.9191 Mining R-4 Light Density 35233.9192 Asphalt Production Residential 35233.0709 Recycling 35233.{1513 35233.1371,E 35233.0604 35233.0605 35233.0645 35 233.0607 35233.0608 35233.0504. 35233.0505 35233.9176 rn gra m 7t di-jt PARSONS/BM NE TT/B/ORDAHL/HUMEili, A f:!ORN 'YS Stacy A. fijordahl E 1 D cb1nrc2h,f6phi a Sv.h March 31,2015 Ma 3 .1 LUIS VAIN Community Development Department City of Spokane Valley 11707 E, Sprague Ave,Suite 106 Spokane Valley,WA 99206 Re. Citizen tnitintedAmendment Request to the Comprehensive Plan Dear Mr.Hohman: On behalf of CPM Development Corporation, we are submitting the attached Citizen- Initiated Amendment Request to the City's Comprehensive Plan. The attached application proposes a: 1) Text Amendment to add a new chapter to the Comprehensive Plan, entitled "Mineral Resource Lands,"and, 2) Corresponding Map.Amendment to designate four sites [Sullivan, Park, 8th and Havana,and Carnahan] as a Mineral Resource Land Overlay designation on the City's Official Comprehensive Plan Map. If you have any questions regarding the enclosed. please feel free to contact me ter the applicant's designated contact,Jana McDonald. Sincerely, PABSONS/ uR E! !/BIORDAFtL/HUMS LIP f . lacy t�. 1r3 �,r�h Encl. 05• Ki+crrkit;Avc,Spur,4i11'. .rkaaleWA Li.2i1l • T(503;.2-S(I.G • I (5%.,1)252-5067 • sriv,n.ghlawLrc A Lititac I Liabi.t I'.i rer ll.1r,vt:lt•:f'iary inSpnkinc,nd Belau, RECEIVED MU t le .i 2015 Attachment to Proposed Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment :, i.Th ''M'+1I ti Applicant: CPA Development Corp. 1.14..vr 1" thtJi 1_ Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; The Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to adopt designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term camrnercral signification for the extraction of minerals. ROW 36.70.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. ROW 36.70A,060. No land use impacts are anticipated as the proposed mineral resource land sites are currently used for the production of minerals or raining related uses. 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria belcrwa a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to adopt designate natural resource lands that are net already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. ROW 36.70A.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. ROW 36.70A060. A Comprehensive Plan that is compliant with the GMA is in the best interest of the public health, safely and general welfare, and ensures protection of valuable natural resources found in our environment. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of ROW 36.70A and with the City's adapted Comprehensive Plan; As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to adopt designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. ROW 36.70A.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource!ands. ROW 36.70A.060. 0. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within vThich the subject property lies; N/A d, The proposed amendment corrects en obvious error; and As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to adopt designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. ROW 36.70A.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to policies and deve/opmenf regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. ROW 36 70A.060. Page 1 of 2 When the City adopted its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations following incorporation of the City, it failed to designate and protect existing miners' resource lands within the corporate limits of the, City as required by the GIM, which was obvious error. a The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. When the City adopted its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations following incorporation of the City, it failed to designate and protect existing mineral resource lands within they corporate limits of the City as required by the GMAA which is a deficiency in the City's Comprehensive Plan, Page 2 of 2 ECEIVED F iprI ! 1015 Adopt a New Chapter to the City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan entitled r r `,, 44Chapter" "—Mineral Resource Lands" Mineral Resource Lands include mineral lands of long-term commercial significance. Spokane County is blessed with an abundant supply of natural resource lands, Mineral land areas are primarily devoted to sand,gravel, rock, or clay production. Related products such as concrete, asphalt and brick are also produced. Mineral resource lands have special characteristics that make them productive. These characteristics include unique soils and geological structure. They cannot be re-created if they are lost to urban development or nlistnanaged. Mineral resources must meet criteria of quality, quantity and accessibility for commercial viability. Location of mineral resources is important, since the cost of transporting them adds greatly to cost. Goals MRL.I a Provide for necessary mineral resources while preserving and protecting the natural environment arid private property rights, MRL.I b Ensure adequate supply, long-term conservation and wise stewardship of mineral resources within the City of Spokane Valley for the benefit of current and future residents. Policies MRL.l.1 Mineral resource lands of long-tem commercial significance shall be designated as an overlay or official maps and adopted by the City Council through a comprehensive planning process. i IRL.1_2 Environmentally sensitive areas, which may be degraded by mining uses, should not be classified as mineral resource lands. MRL.1.3 Mineral resource land designations should be reviewed every 5 years and amended if necessary to reflect better information or change of conditions. Mineral Land Designation Criteria MRL 1.4 Mineral Resource Lands of long-term commercial significance should be designated on official maps and adopted by the City Council through a comprehensive planning process. Mining shall be allowed on lands not meeting mineral resource designation criteria if environmental protection and compatibility with adjacent land uses is assured. M1L.1.5 Mineral Resource Lands of long-term commercial significance should meet all of the following criteria; a) In the City of Spokane Valley,the commercially important minerals are sand, gravel,rock or clay. Mineral resource land designations should be made where these minerals are lenown to exist. The Mineral Resource Lands Overlay Map should be used as a tool to help identify additional sites to help meet future demand. Page 1 b) Mineral resource land designations should be located in areas with compatible land uses, such as mining, industrial, or vacant lands. c) Mineral resource land designations should be 20 acres or more in size. d) Mineral land designations should have a minimum deposit size of approximately 500,000 cubic yards for sand,gravel and rock, and approximately 200,000 cubic yards for blend sand. e) Mineral resource land designations shall not occur on lands with wetlands,riparian areas, geological hazard or threatened or endangered species unless impacts can be adequately mitigated. I)Mineral resource land designations shall have adequate access for trucks. Access should not be through a residential neighborhood. Goal MRL.2: Land uses shall be consistent with the conservation of designated mineral resource lands and shall not interfere with resource land management practices. Policies MRL.2.1 Viable mining activities shall be protected (rein conflicts through the use of zoning requirements, plat requirements, grandfather rights and similar methods. MRL-2.2 Uses permitted on or near mineral resource lands must be compatible and not interfere with the economic benefit provided by that natural resource. MRL.2.3 The primary land use activities on mineral resource lands are mineral extraction and those uses that maintain,enhance or have insignificant impact on the long-term management of designated natural resource lands. MRL.2.4 Land use activities within or adjacent tv mineral resource lands should be sited and designed to minimize conflicts with resource-related activities. MRL2.5 Specific development and performance standards for access, lot size and configuration, fire protection, water supply and dwelling unit location should be adopted for development within or adjacent to mineral resource lands. These standards will provide for buffer areas adjacent to designated mineral resource lands that minimize conflict with commercial natural resource activities. Residential Development on Mineral Resource Lands Policies MRL.2.6 Residential use on mineral resource lands shall be discouraged unless the residential use is related to resource land management or production. MRL.2.7 Mineral lands are designated only for parcels with proven mineral reserves. Only residences connected with the mineral extraction activity should exist on mineral lands, Commercial and Industrial Use On Natural Resource Lands MRL.2.8 Non-resource-related industrial developments such as major industrial developments. airports and storage yards shall not be allowed on designated resource lands. MRL..2.9 Industries related to and dependent upon mineral resources or mining shall be allowed on designated resource lands. :vMR.L 2,I 0 Retail sales facilities and activities shall not be alloyed on natural resource lands except as accessory to the sale of commodities produced on-site, sale of sand and gravel associated with on-site mining activity. Rage 2 Goal .NLRL.4 Use best management practices and other innovative techniques in a sustainable and eavlronmentaily sensitive manner to protect mineral resource lands from incompatible activities, Policies MRL.4.1 Notification should be placed on all land use pennits or approvals on or within 1,000 feet of designated mineral resource lands, stating that the adjacent land is in resource use and subject to a variety of activities that may not be compatible with residential development, MRL.4.2 Mining operations shall be allowed on mineral resource lands when carried on in compliance with applicable regulations, even though they may impact nearby residences. MR.L.4.3 Mineral resource lands shall be managed, conserved and protected while used for natural resource production and restored to a natural state or developed in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan once resource use has stopped. Mineral Land Policies 1►v RL.4.4 Recognize that mineral resources are site-specific and not subject to relocation. MRL-4,5 Mining shall be allowed on urban lands as well as lands designated as mineral lands if environmental protection and compatibility with adjacent land uses is assured, MRL.4.6 Approval of new proposed mining operations should include conditions that: a)The extraction proposal meets all applicable zoning requirements; b) The proposed extraction operation is buffered from existing or potential developments within. the vicinity of the proposed operation; c)A permit, which includes a reclamation plan and performance bond, is obtained through the Washington State Department of Natural Resources; d)Provide for protection of groundwater and surface water, including wetlands, during and after operation; e)The monitoring and clean-up of contaminants should be ongoing; f)A permit, when applicable, from DOE for coverage under the Sand and Gravel General Permit. Page 3 RECEIVED Attachment to Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment c"r'tti'�+�Ih-yrs"1 =Y Applicant: CPM Development Corp. ; ,�rtf�;in�ll`V'tf1� d{�i►'� r Why the proposed amendment is needed. The Washington State Growth Management Act requires aitch county and city to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. RCW 36.70A.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to adopt policies and development regulations to assure The conservation of mineral resource lands. RCW 36.70A060, The City has riot designated mineral resource lands or adopted policies and development regulations to protect designated mineral resource lands. 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have ion -tem? commercial signification for the extraction of minerals, RCW 36,70A.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to adopt policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. RCW 36.70A.0 0. A Comprehensive Plan that is compliant with the GMA is lir the best interest of the public health. safety and general welfare, and ensures protection of valuable natural resources found in our environment. b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals, RCW 36 701.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to adoptpolicies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. RCW 36.70A.060. Presently, the City's Comprehensive Plan is not in compliance with the GMA because it does not contain policies to preserve and protect mineral resource lands. c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial charge in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; N/A d, The proposed amendment correots an obvious error; and The Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. RCW 36.70k170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to adopt policies and Page 1 of 3 development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands, RCW 36.70A.060, When the City adopted its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations following incorporation of the City, it failed to designate and protect existing mineral resource lands within the corporate limits of the City as required by the GMA, which was obvious error. e. The proposed amendtent addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan_ When the City adopted its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations following incorporation of the City, it failed to designate and protect existing mineral resource lands within the corporate limits of the City as required by the GMA, which is a deficiency in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a. The effect upon the physical environment, lll}A. The properties proposed for designation as a llitrreral Resource Land Overlay designation were previously designated as Natural Resource Lands by Spokane County prior to incorporation of the City and are currently{ used for mineral resource production andior mining-related activities. b, The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and hakes; N/A. The properties proposed for designation as a Mineral Resource Land Overlay designation were previously designated as Natural Resource Lands by Spokane County prior to incorporation of the City and are currently used for mineral resource production and/or mining-related activities. It is also noted that those lands that are located near water bodies will be regulated under the City's Shoreline Master Program after mining operations are complete_ o. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding rseighborhuuds; NM_ As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. RC W 36.70A.170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to adopt policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. F CW 36.7OA.060. When the City adopted its Comprehensive Pian and development regulations following incorporation of the City, rt failed to designate and protect existing mineral resource lands within the corporate limits of the City as required by the GMA, which was obvious error. The City also failed to adopt regulations to protect mineral resource lands from incompatible land uses. O. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; Page 2 of 3 N/A. Those properties proposed for designation as a Mineral Resource Land Overlay designation are already used for mitring and/or mining-related uses, with the necessary infrastructure in place to support The use. e The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; As noted above, the Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and oily to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growth and have forrg-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. RCW 36.70.4 170 The GMA also requires cities and counties to adopt policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. ROW 36,70A.06 . A Comprehensive Plan that Is compliant wr#h the GIiiA is in the best interest of the public health, safety and general welfare, and ensures protection of valuable natural resources found in our environment, f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density, and the demand for such land; See attached map and summary of parcels proposed for designation as a Mineral Resource Land Overlay. The demand for mineral lands is dependent on location of the resource and market need for the resource. g. The current and projected population density in the area; and N/A. Those properties proposed for designation as a Mineral Resource Land Overlay designation are already used for mining and/or mining-related uses, with the necessary infrastructure in place to support the use. h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. The Washington State Growth Management Act requires each county and city to designate natural resource lands that are not already characterized by urban growler and have long-term commercial signification for the extraction of minerals. l C W 36.70..170. The GMA also requires cities and counties to adopt policies and development regulations to assure the conservation of mineral resource lands. RCW 36.70A,060. A Comprehensive Plan that is compliant with the GMA is in the best interest of the public health, safety and general welfare, and ensures protection of valuable natural resources found in our environment. Page 3 of 3 . Z •.— s , e ' am ._ I - ,...,.*:,„.79-..f;' S'� • _ b.1 t ' ' ,•-•:17 .— . f E- I ! - '''.".',:-_,„„..-7--' ^,� ^ -"k 3 J'- `' ,-. .--;:i,::;,_---:,,,,,,. adf . r , ' - .'' . . CeKaCID' • :.,. . -. ' '.'-'::11::.71;:t .11-74! ::1: ,,i'' •,,--' w ,E _ Wit' - P,__ _�- k ;d U..1 sW L • i r r :r • y ,' • - - . 6, • •fir r- i o 11 f1f w S ' `ice. _ —I • _ r - .� f. i y , w_ r 1. i` - r" f-�- • _ ��:: — , 4. _ e j � +� ri • f rf . ;; . -- } - • ` y.. ? r Tc r "'ma NAR 3 1 2015 KANE VALLFY DOPAR CCM FSAUNiTY DEV pm 1T __ — --- • �1. y — .F alp t U�:. ctr 1, 3C �.` y ,s -- o-573�1.1S _ _ a s 153.:Y,'7i _ _ ,�.. '{ ,� Yi Tri,..._.. x.77 " 4 r -.T4 rbk !;-' [ ` Tstirs -mss ° 33131 i. L.._ ti+ . ' _ X5 13 11- �• _ ' F. _ . - — u 71 3-... s ..-. _ - I _- _ .. yPP I , - w . • : f a } - rc y t - - y ..- 0 . '"=-'-'.---='-' .-- - '�k •�- '.iF *1130_ *i -.03, .'i _ 3513 r ' • • - .. //•�'111 �A a. - - -v. - 4 - %,c4.1:111 df. .... � _ • ti LI _.: F - - �,r 187+C1Cf 'ill • _ . br - � a T 35 fes 4,..'' fir— � �. . " j2i1lii n ,�<, �1/ 1_1_LY :,...„...:•:,:-,.: .0 170 . • s4 Y .,--_ • f- , *- i` 35d232.9061J29O,1 -„ !-J i}, LI v�,". . -- _ `n- •' 't' `*'•; ; S s r .. _tet _ 35-2- 91 a . x ?t _ „y. t r Y is k .. - - - eAE A . _virui ip ... $ - .' q-- • , .. .. , ..._ • _ .. r A ::11iirgr-tEt " . _-..r , . . . • I r.,-'-',,"3-- ,.. •• t. ,r4. . . , . - .- ° " - 1" 'r A`` -,- 1---_ ,...--,.., [ :mss 1 „t46e= ' ''''r 0} . . , �. ."L'.. ___ ;ice `i - • • f T ti . . ..+.t ',,,--44 i 4.. 4 -Iv, �. •;1'...-3ae •,. ..5-• ,. ` '.,:.„-...1.: WA,, r - may- - w Jd . ' -`+v'4f '. 2,••••• •', git . 4. LL1 # ry . F -+L�" • • s :i 3,i'.' k- loyal'k •? _ _ _ �"...-.._, .,...4,- Li;,'� Y xel-- .. `..A• d - - ' z ,-..k.„.., - ,,. * ARNAHAN at ' � e E �fi. � ' ° � / • . -"k� 5 � rt : 42 '� + - - . � j�t�'?w + � % i;:;,::',_�V` `' s1 ' .'-i6.-- till, T ;- - {{ r4,t ` P ., •+ .e ,: 4ld o- 'r- ;4E : tih tf 3te' V_ - . . A - 23 341 . • � .' 5f}1 • r s w.,,....,..,_, - _ y • =_ a • teaW rt• _ ,_ . --',�— i f- r - ° - .—. - •vim d ' ,M.c. `_ _ .. -NOON a ,ot • • 1 ° - F • _. . •:, .4,:•-.4;•,. .:;-'7.:i•:-;:,•4-:;•'•:".•-•- * ":. y- r , ••- - • ti • - -17 -- -s • , . 4. - a_ . • f- ._ , . -r s Y — • .. •_fn -.'•F l a.. x-. '�...- . v ''1' aA % '6t7 _ l :� •yam „^' •• . S. . ,, k1. i S r% °Y ,- -• • ,,,, �,• - e�x ry '-.40,i.:,-e` 1.k...'---‘5.4 4 4di •e T x� ?. t 1 '''7 „�- a%C s� {� °��y•f— + ! - —'4'.1:.••.'! .......:� r. - _ , ; r ' - - - r., 0 .ihr. i.e. ri ._ _ . ._ . __ .. . , ,_,,,.. - . . . ..,...... _._ .. . . %--,"4 2532.1 2 _ .� - - ”' R. _. a - . • • 8TH & HAVANA C ` s . • .Y:`41" s'f p. •'aW.: _ _ +*}' -` , � � . - _ twrtS by a. ~ • 4_ 3S23S.`!. ° -" __ , . yrte � '' � - �y �. - _ ' - �' /. r _ - roK 1a -.-. . - • -;; . a • c itea -x'4[. la , i . ' .. 24-14.'„7-. :a.'a"! a _ . "' .16 ,a17� 7a-`6 _- Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Reginald B. Martin APPLICATION No.: 45104.0312 PROPERTY OWNER: Reginald B. Martin SITE ADDRESS: 13520 E Nora Avenue PARCEL No.: 45104.0312 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Office PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Community Commercial ZONING DESIGNATION: Office PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: Community Commercial Summary of Request: Mr. Martin withdrew his application. No further action is necessary. Context: N/A Criteria: N/A Implications: N/A Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Map showing requested change B. Aerial Map of subject property C. Current Comprehensive Plan map CAR-2015-0019—Staff Analysis Page 1 Comprehensive Plan Map I 90 I 90 190E290 OFF Nora Stutly Area CAR 15-0019 ive Plan map designation from 0 to Zoning Map 190E290 OFF Nora Stutly Area • f _ — _ f ' I90s Ni - I90Wum. __ _- r-r. 190me - I90 E290 OFF Nur N'ora ..... - "ti ii:St eili u Lang . ^■■ 1, w . ill � C 40 j .L, _ � . Study Area ii 1111 II N i A' iT. .. + 3 ` or R r 7 n''''' _ ..,..yed CAR 15-0019 Request: Applicant: Reginald Martin Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from 0 to Spokane Parcel#: 45104.0312 C;subsequent Rezone from 0 to C ....Valley Address: 13520 E Nora Ave Martin Palaniuk From: reginald martin <regmartin13@me.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 29, 2015 6:18 AM To: Martin Palaniuk Subject: Re: Citizen-initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request CAR-2015-0019 To Martin Palaniuk, I withdraw my request for a zoning change of the parcel at 13520 E Nora (45102-0312. Reginald B Martin Sent from my iPhone On Apr 28,2015,at 9:21 AM, Martin Palaniuk<mpalaniuk@spokanevalley.org>wrote: Mr. Martin, Per our telephone conversation on April 28, 2015 I would like to confirm that you wish to withdraw you amendment request File No. CAR-2015-0019 from further consideration. Your request was to change the comprehensive plan designation on parcel number 45104.0312, addressed as 13520 E Nora Ave, from Office to Community Commercial. Please reply to this email with your confirmation that you are withdrawing your request. Respectfully, Marty Martin Talaniuk Planner City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 (509) 720-5031 mpalaniuk(c�spokanevalley.orq 1 Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Land Use Solutions and Entitlement APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0020 Dwight Hume, Agent PROPERTY OWNER: Pineview Trust/ Pineview NW, LLC et al PARCEL No.: 45222.0719, 45222.0720, SITE ADDRESS: 12717, 12725, 12803, 12815, 12823, 12842 45222.0721, 45222.0722, 45222.0723, E 4th Avenue 45222.0842 CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Medium Density Residential (MDR) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential (HDR) ZONING DESIGNATION: Medium Density Multi-family Residential district (MF-1) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: High Density Multi-family Residential district (MF-2) Summary of Request: The proposal seeks to change the Land Use designation on the Comprehensive Plan Map for six properties that are adjacent to each other from MDR to HDR, resulting in a rezone from MF-1 to MF-2. The six properties are located at 12717, 12725, 12803, 12815, 12823, and 12842 E 4th Avenue. Context: The six lots are located on 4th Avenue between Pines Road and McDonald Road. The lots range in size from 0.97 acres to 1.31 acres, and total 7.2 acres collectively. Five of the six lots are 100 feet wide with the remaining lot 80 feet wide. The parcels are long and narrow, with depths ranging from 540 feet to 580 feet. The five westernmost lots have been developed with single family homes along the southern portion of the lots facing 4th Avenue. The easternmost lot is vacant. Subdivision of the lots into single family lots may be challenging given the roadway improvements that would be required for access. Long, narrow lots usually develop with a single access roadway with no connectivity. Single family residential uses have been developed along the eastern boundary and across 4th Avenue to the south. The Keystone Apartments are located adjacent to the west. The Spokane County Appleway Trail right of way extends along the entire north boundary with a large restaurant and entertainment use located across the right of way. Land use designations for the surrounding parcels include Corridor Mixed Use (CMU) on the Appleway Trail to the north and extending to Sprague Avenue. MDR is located east and west of the site with Low Density Residential (LDR)south of the site. The zoning consists of CMU, MF-1 in the MDR designation and R-3 in the LDR designation. The established single family uses are permitted in the MF-1 and MF-2 zones. The Appleway Trail is programmed to extend from Pines Road to Sullivan Road and will travel along the north side of the property. The trail will provide a pedestrian and non-vehicular path from the site as far east as Sullivan Road and as far west as the University Center area. Access to the trail will be available along its entire length. 4th Avenue is a Collector, which distributes trips into, and collects trips out of, neighborhood areas. Pines Road is identified as State Route 27 and provides access from Spokane Valley south into southeastern Spokane County. McDonald Road is designated a Minor Arterial, which accommodates trips of moderate length at a lower level of travel mobility than principal arterials. They may carry local bus routes and provide intra-community continuity, but ideally they do not penetrate neighborhoods. Implications: A re-zone of the parcel to MF-2 would allow higher density residential development (up to 22 units per acre)and a broader range of retail and office uses. The adjacent residential uses would experience CAR-2015-0020—Staff Analysis Page 1 impacts with high density residential or commercial development that include visual impacts, greater building height, and increased traffic. Impacts would be mitigated through building setbacks, screening and landscaping, and relational building height restrictions. The following table provides a comparison of the development requirements for both zones. MF-1 and MF-2 Development Standard Comparison Lot Maximums Lot Minimums Minimum Setbacks Zone Building Coverage Area Width Depth Front/Flanking Rear Side Garage Height Yard Yard Yard MF-1 40 ft. 60% 3,600 45 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft.* 5 ft.* N/A MF-2 50 ft. 65% 2,000 20 ft. 80 ft. 15 ft. 10 ft.* 5 ft.* N/A *Adjacent to a single-family residential use or zone requires a relational height setback. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the specific focus on multi-family zoning identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the Housing theme identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if HDR is an appropriate designation for these parcels. Ana lysis will focus on the current supply and demand of MF-2 zoned parcels, including identification of the need for more or less MF-2 zoned parcels. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if MF-2 is compatible with surrounding uses and if it is appropriate to increase the boundaries of the potential rezone to include additional surrounding parcels. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property CAR-2015-0020—Staff Analysis Page 2 Comprehensive Plan Map ‘41411414114.14INNNNN4ss : -..-'''''''''''''''%'.''.''''''''''.'''.''''‘'''''''''''''''' '''''''''''''''' ''''''' Study Area -.1 1 s 4'-‘1%-"''''''N :%'%"I k i i..,.....1%-'*s s-'4 1 s‘14'%\N-.%1/4%.4'IN%%Is' . ...'Ns's 1 N...'''''`.....N ii,,,.. ...,,.. .-.4 4.1'N .......-.s' .'i.... .. ,....4.,..'s%%.* 1 J 2nd H 3rd LU LU w> LU w w w 6'Q w w w w o a a N a> 03_Cs1 1- a N a N 1- I, 1,= 1,_ r 00= 00= a M r r r r \d 4th .a t CAR 15-0020 Request: Applicant: Dwight Hume Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45222.0719-.0723, .0842 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 Val ley Address: See Map Zoning Map ,Study Area '''''''...N-.'''' ,,,,,,,..: .N.'N.i:s s s''''. ..'..'''..-'..'--"--. ..:-,.."'N.--,"--, I 1 J 2nd I 3rd W UJ Ili UJ Ez El W UM gi ri 1 1a 11 el a td 4th I) .a t CAR 15-0020 Request: '' Applicant: Dwight Hume Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45222.0719-.0723, .0842 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 Val ley Address: See Map r_ 1.. 1.,,.. 4i I•i toe_ I4. .. o ," iiiil.1 f tt _ 0j° Study Area a • U - - , � , pa illifr 4'1' 011114 •^ 1 1 41! C D Le 7t M -I, N f P -CI 2nd , I -" J. I r 3rd - -. h © r gi I 111 11 N,� 11 01 R 1g M 3rd J r4. -r..., - _. .,, f. lie ! , . t: -1 111111•11at ir i le Alai . , t • ili - ,-Lamb viliN I WI 4 .i.,, . l7 . — .... �' .. ___ x _ _ _ _ _ . CAR 15-0020 Request: Applicant: Dwight Hume Change the Comprehensive Plan map designation from MDR to Spokane Parcel#: 45222.0719-.0723, .0842 HDR;subsequent Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 . Walley Address: See Map aii 3,'7y L- { J' A.,...;!:,-,.. 'tea. n{� if ��' `, • ii•2C'sti r..-* Looking NE onto site Looking East t 1y - , , • w • n �.' 3 .ti . • / AEI,— , F lis : • -- ii-A-- p Looking NW Looking North onto site '.... i : MIA 4'frk 2 ei."1• '441: --•'-- .j% li ri,4c,1"1 .t.''f,'"V''.;a' . • -, — , - All, , ....P.- if;a, „ • . . 2--,. .,- - '-',-. .-,- rri5.'1' L. re j.t•f'•. •• AV' .• 4'4g.' V r . . :,.. ' . ;17,-. --; • ,-- •' . ., 4... LL , . ,'Ir.431 ! '. n• t -' tr. ., ,, , i dill .• f- ,,. .i.''4 A t...'.442 . .• - 1..- . + .. .... .7,,_ ,• ._ . . AI -•-• "ir le• • m .• ' ... .t. __ -le'' ' lliNiumill -, --. r '. ' ,‘ 1 . 1 ' i iii -NI 't _ ' ----t----. - -iroms...... ..._,— , - 1 - - _____ _ — - i__ _ . — _ Looking SE Looking North .•-•-..... \ , _.------ • ill "..-. r r. r •--• • `i•ik \--- 4111, \, ___ illO _.' ,... . • ,,eal ''' 4. . 4 Pp. .. ' • ..' . ENVY p '1'lilt i-44414f7 \ p P 4 a 4 I P,I , .. - _ . . = ______.4 , - ._,IL".1t-;.'-...9.,.-..-. - 2_-_ ..1.10•110_ m_._ il.immos - -• _ -..- - , --'401141n ' ---„ Looking West Looking South IP 0 riii111111111C443401111fr- _,:ir 44 -, 1 IIIIILilli"IeAIIIIIIkllinb- I. Looking North r i� : h t f . ; f, F P yyy • a(i - +'. .-fi .,!•,4 ,�Y'��{'". r. • .¢ { `'0,:„..,:;-.;," 4 F 5"- x ' y .fRJY "A iiy 3� f i� ,i7 r, ti t'wi. a f'15v`. •1'1. .may. _ Looking NE onto site Looking East onto site COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Siiiikane ��. CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Canneauthy of OpporUrrui y PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION x Map amendment; or [J Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: Land Use Solutions and Entitlement Dwight Hume agent MAILING ADDRESS:9101 N Mt. View Lane CITY:Spokane STATE:.WA ZIP:99218 EMAIL: dhume{o spoI ane- PHONE: 509-435-3108 FAX: CELL:Same landuse.com PROPERTY DWIIER: Plnev ew TriistiPineview NW LLC et al MAILING ADDRESS: 19012 S Nevada Rd CiTY:Spa nte 1 STATE: Zip:99031 PHONE: NSA FAX: CELL: EMAIL: NIA SITE ADDRESS: 12725, 12843, 12815, 12823, 12642 E ill'Ave. PARCEL No.: 45222.0719-23, 0842 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MDR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: HDR ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-1 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: MF-2 BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TsxT AMENDMENT(attach full explanatbn on separate sheet of paper): Increase the density on 6 ene acre lots to accommodate more residential units in direct proximity to shopping and the Appleway Iraii system. PL-4e V1.0 Page 4 et 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION '� 'COM-Mil.Plif}3 of O] orruodirf+ PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner Or applicant) !y gtle--- , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthffilly and to the best of my knowledge_ 411/e Bina ure) - kv ''4‘ . . ' ' - 3/-13 — ` (Date) PL-48 V1.0 Page 5of5 . ' ic)\ O Land Use Solutions Entitlement Land Ti e t'7_anni nca __ 9101 N. MT. VTEW LAI Spokane, WA 99218 C9-435-310B (V) .5Q9-467-8229 (r) 3-27-15 Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Community Development Planning Division 11707 B Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley 99206 Ref: Proposed CAR Map Amendment from MDR to HDR Dear Lori: ' have enclosed the complete application and SETA checklist for the above referenced map amendment. 1 want to make it clear that I represent just one third of the area under this request. That is to say, that there are 6 one acre lots contiguous to one another located just west of McDonald on 4tn Avenue and I represent the westerly 2. lots of these 6. Notwithstanding,the request is strengthened by the inclusion of these other ownerships as you will see in my application comments. I think it is worth mentioning that an examination of the city-wide zoning map reveals that between Flora and Dishman Mica along 4th Avenue, most of the multi-family zinittg is in fact IIDR not MDR. This in itself affirms that the HDR density is suitable for this area of the City along the Appleway corridor and future public way improvements against walk-to commercial services across that corridor. Finally,the request enables the City to accommodate in-fill so vital to the implementation of your GMA plan. Please keep me informed as this application is considered. Respectfully Submitted Oirir Wightume Land Use Solutions and Entitlement F -- S 1J T — } Printed from naps spokanecotanty.orcg on 03/31/2015 at 1 1:40 AM 5oo �eCaunry -..„_____/ 5pr.ogue kd - - - - _ _- _ _ ttxt,Tf�N • 151;;:,i31CAMt6`.VkUr( ... -C••2:?(314 1. a — _ .6.-i n -.. __ .. y - ,- -. . I s"-.1 ` _ nntyy: _ na R4- . 7 - _ - - 2T Acf/yf�t J Map Amendment Narrative Spokane Volley r:or rpreherwvL Plan Proposed Amendm t; Change the land use category from MDR to HDR and the zone from ME-I to MF-2 on 6 platted lots comprising 6 acres along 4t" Avenue that back up against the future Appleway trail system. 1) ttlhy is the proposed amendment needed? Spokane Valley needs to provide more in-fill to meet its GMA projected population allocation. The subject properties consist of detached single family homes of individual ownership, each of which is too small (one acre), to be of cost effective conversion to the current MF-1 density of land use. There is no incentive to aggregate these ownerships into a single project. 2) Describe how the amendment meets the approval criteria below: a) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The proposed amendment would be developed pursuant to applicable development standards. It is also served or can be served with adequate infrastructure and utilities. b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. This amendment offers additional in-fill opportunities to implement the population allocation adopted into the plan. Applicable goals and policies have already supported a majority of the el Avenue frontage from Flora to Dishman Mica for HDR use. c) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owners control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies. The former Milwaukee RR Rights-of-Way adjoins these parcels and has been designated by the city for public use and access. d) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error. Not Applicable e) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. This amendment would increase Me potential for in-fill in implementing the intended population allocated for Spokane Valley. 3) Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a) The effect upon the physical environment; Projects would be developed pursuant to applicable development standards of Spokane Valley's development code. As stated above, a majority of the multi- family zoning along the north side of Orta Avenue is already developed at HDR densities without adverse effects upon the physical environment. b) The effect on open space, streams rivers and lakes; The amendment if approved fronts along the proposed public corridor. There are no impacts to water bodies. c) The compatibility with and impacts on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; There are sufficient development standards to develop next to single family land use. Other performance standards for buffering and landscaping ensure compatibility. Moreover, existing HDR developments along eh Avenue from Flora to Diishmara Mica have not created adverse incompatibility issues. d) The adequacy of and impacts on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks recreation and schools; Spokane Valley has already committed itself to a specific population allocation within its comprehensive plan. Therefore the plan does address the adequacy of these services and can accommodate this proposed in-fill. e) The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; This location along the Appleway corridor and adjacent walk to commercial areas lying north of this corridor, minimizes the impact of high density in-fill. f) The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land. Thedemand is triggered by the City's commitment to accommodate a specific increase of population. The issue is finding adequate land to accommodate this population in-fill, This 6 acres needs the incentive for cost effective implementation. This is a land use pattern, that has proven to be compatible along 4th Avonue. g) The current and projected population in the area; The population has been allocated without specific locations for this iri-fill. This is an area proven to accommodate higher density luring. h) The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. Since other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan have not been affected by the majority of this 4th Avenue currently committed to NOR, there should be no new impacts to other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan by this proposed amendment. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Land Use Solutions and Entitlement APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0021 PROPOSED CODE TEXT AMENDMENT: SVMC 19.60.020 GO, Garden Office district; 19.60.030 0, Office district; and 19.120.050 Permitted Use Matrix SITE ADDRESS: N/A PARCEL No.: N/A CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Office designation PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Office designation ZONING DESIGNATION: GO and 0 designations PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: GO and 0 designations Summary of Request: The proposed amendment is a text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) relating to the Garden Office zone (GO) and Office zone (0), found in SVMC 19.60.020 and 19.60.030 respectively. The proposal is to allow multi-family as a permitted use in both the GO and 0 zones, subject to the development standards of SVMC 19.40.070 for the GO zone and SVMC 19.40.080 for the 0 zone. Also included in this proposal is the repeal of SVMC 19.60.020(6)(2), which limits multi-family units in the GO zone only to buildings and structures with nonresidential uses on the entire ground floor. Context: Garden Office Zone The Garden Office designation is intended primarily for low-rise office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Garden Office uses are intended to provide a buffer between residential uses and commercial uses. Multi-family dwelling units are currently allowed as supplemental uses in the GO zone, meaning that it is subject to supplemental use regulations, which are outlined in SVMC 19.60.020(6)(2). This supplemental use regulation only allows multi-family dwelling units in a building or structure with nonresidential uses on the entire ground floor. Office Zone The Office designation is intended primarily for medium-to high-rise office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Multi-family dwelling units are currently allowed as supplemental uses in the 0 zone, meaning that it is subject to supplemental use regulations, which are outlined in SVMC 19.60.020(6)(2). This supplemental use regulation only allows multi-family dwelling units in a building or structure with nonresidential uses on the entire ground floor Implications: Adding regulatory language in the GO and 0 zones to outright permit multi-family dwelling units without limiting it to buildings and structures with nonresidential uses on the entire ground floor would open up CAR-2015-0021.—Staff Analysis Page 1. parcels within the City that previously would not be allowed to build multi-family residential units to be developed for this use. The proposal asks for the allowance of multi-family uses with a density of up to 12 units per acre in the GO zone and a density of up to 22 units per acre in the 0 zone (consistent with the MF-1 and MF-2 densities, respectively). Development of multi-family residential in the GO zone would be governed by SVMC 19.40.070 and subject to the development standards for MF-1 shown in SVMC Table 19.40-1 while development of multi-family residential in the 0 zone would be governed by 19.40.080 and subject to the development standards for MF-2 shown in SVMC Table 19.40-1. This proposed code text amendment may have impacts to the City's Land Quantity Analysis and subsequently, how the City proposes to accommodate its population allocation. Focus areas and public input themes: The application appears to align with the office focus area identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the housing public input themes identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public visioning meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to consider regulatory language allowing multifamily residential uses in the GO and 0 zones throughout the City. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of GO and 0 zoned parcels including identification of the need for more or less of these parcels. Furthermore, analysis of multi-family housing supply and demand will need to occur to determine the impact of this code text amendment. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The proposal will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be included in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City. Exhibits: A. Application CAR-2015-0021—Staff Analysis Page 2 Sinane ValleCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 1 CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLUCATL IJN Corusrnnily r!/Opporiumry PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION ❑ Map amendment; or X Text amendment APPLICANT NAME: Land Use Solutions and Entitlement, Dwight Hume agent MAILING AnnREss: g1O1 N Mt. View Lane CiiY: S.okane STATE:WA ZIP: 99218 EMAIL:dim me@spokane- PHONE: 508435-3108 FAX: CELL:same Ianduse.com PROPERTY OWNER: N/A Text Amendment to Zane Code MAILING ADDRESS: NIA CITY: N/A STATE:NA ZIP: N/A PHONE: NSR Fret: N/A CELL:NIA EMAIL: NFA SITE ADDRESS: NIA , PARCEL NO.: NfA COrnPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Garden Office (GO)and Office (0) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: NIA ZONING DESIGNATION: Garden Office (GOpnd Office (0) PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: NIA BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper): Amend the Garden Office zone to al[tw MF 1 residential density as an additional use and/or option in-lieLr-of office Amend the Office zone to allow MF-2 density residential density as an addrtional use and/or optional use in-lieu--of office. I ?cis PL-4B V1.0 Fags 4 cf 5 11f n' .00 Valley COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Crrrrrorro4F0:oJGpplrlar rry PART III - AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) i, /4 x,7,0. , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are madetrutr . and to the best of my knowledge. A Z.4-1 . ,', _ Alle: ao, 1 '''' (Signature) (Date) PL-4R V1_111 Page 5 of 5 Text Amendmant Narrative Spoke tic Valley Zone Cmlr Proposed Amendment: Amend the Garden Office zone (30) to allow MF-1 density as an additional use and/or option in-lieu-of office. AND Amend the Office (0) zone to allow MF-2 density residential as en additional and/or optional use in-Feu-of office, 1) Why is the proposed amendment needed and what are its potential land use impacts? The amendment would: a) provide suitable locations for residential in-fill without having to do annual map amendments and down zones from office to My-? or MF 2. Other benefits include: h) Adds additional irr-fill options for residential growth heretofore commuted to in the GM Plan whereas current in-fill options are questionably adequate for obtaining the population allocation adopted into the GM Plan. c) Without this amendment, increased residential densities may be required and yet won't be implemented in Spokane's apartment rental market. d) Office zoned properties have similar site location requirements to apartment uses and similar bulk and scale issues. e) The option for residential use can stimulate new land use and tax base revenues during a soft office market. The land use impacts would be minimal due to the similarity of site requirements, such as arterial frontage access and infrastructure services. . 2) Describe how the amendment meets the approval criteria below: a) The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. The amendment allows residential use without retail mix as currently required. Development would be subject to applicable development standards to ensure land use compatibility. As a similar use to existing permitted uses, it bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment. b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36_TDA and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. b) The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCVV 3S.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Pian. This amendment offers additional in-fill opportunities to implement the population allocation adopted into the plan. it's location within the GC and 0 categories. places it in similar proximity to required infrastructure and services for either office or apartment uses. It is consistent with the comprehensive plan as it does not change any designated categories. c) The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owners control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies, Not Applicable d) The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error. Not Applicable e) The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan, There is no identified deficiency. Nonetheless, this amendment would increase the potential for in-f!l in implementing the intended population allocated for Spokane Valley. Proposed Amendment Language 19.50.020 GO, Garden Office district. A_ The Garden Office designation is intended primarily for low-rise office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Retail andcommercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subordinate to the primary office use or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the retail or commercial use. Garden Office uses provide a buffer between residential uses and commercial uses. Primary uses including medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financial institutions, design firms, and regal services are representative of this Comprehensive Plan category. B. Supplemental Permitted Use Regulations. 1. Convenience Store. a. Exterior loudspeakers, public address systems or similar audio equipment shall not be permitted; and b. The proposed location shall be directly adjacent to at least a principal or minor arterial street or collector street. 2. Dwelling-uPt ll-beJ --wcl n•Iy---i� -a wilding or structu ith- resi ntal n„ the entic gfesi 1R.� 1 #--Par Sirig-t l residents�T o o e-reserved-aed--ciear marked exoe t ii id �, off+ a �r " n-i�c,x , a�s�U�s �SF e� a Gefl,Gept.4o enourage indep eet-livir-Ifj; 2> Multi-family units subject to the development standards of 19.41070 1137.(1). 3. Traffic from the proposed use on a side street shall be directed to the nearest arterial or collector street and shall not be routed through an adjoining neighborhood, (Ord 09-017 § 1, 2009; Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). 19.60.030 0, Office district. A. The Office designation is intended primarily for medium- to high-rise office development with limited retail or commercial uses. Retail and commercial uses are limited to those that are clearly subordinate to the primary office use or the retail function primarily serves the office uses in close proximity to the retail or commercial use, Primary uses including medical and dental facilities, education services, insurance, real estate, financial institutions, design firms, and legal services are representative of this Comprehensive Plan category. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007). B. Suplernental Permitted Use Regulations 1. Multi-family units subject to the development standards of 19.40.080 (E).(1). 19,120.050 Permitted use matrix GO 0 Supplemental Conditions Residential Dwelling Multi-Family s s— •►"�„ -1g. O 02g (B) (2) Dwelling Multi-Family P SVMC 19,40.070 (B) (1) Dwelling Multi--Family P SVMC 19.40_[)80 Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Greater Valley Support Network APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0022 SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE TEXT: Chapter 19.35 Residential Density Bonus PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT: 19.35.045 Incentives to Develop Affordable Housing Summary of Request: The proposed amendment is to expand affordable housing options for low income households and create more incentives for housing developers. In addition to the existing density incentives, the proposal includes height and bulk bonuses, fee waivers or exemptions, parking reductions, and expedited permitting. Context: The Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)Chapter 19.35 contains the requirements for a residential density bonus. Projects must be new and create a minimum of 20 units to be eligible. Density calculations are based on the median income of the families as well as the type of amenities proposed. Amenities can include underground parking, covered bus shelters, energy efficient construction, indoor recreational facilities, playground equipment and benches. Site design criteria provisions are defined in the regulations. Implications: The proposal directs the incentive toward increasing the supply of low income housing projects, as referenced in RCW 36.70A.540. The current regulations result in one bonus unit for each affordable unit based on the targeted income range of the housing development. The inclusion of additional incentives may result in the increased supply of affordable housing in the City. However, the regulations in Chapter 19.35 would need to be modified and expanded to define the specific requirements to achieve the incentives outlined in the proposal. Typical development standards are defined in the underlying zoning district and in Title 22 Design and Development Standards and would still apply. A review of other regulations affected will be needed to understand the impacts on the adjacent uses as a result of parking reductions, or height increases, etc., as identified in the proposal. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to indirectly align with the multifamily housing focus area identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the public input theme of Housing identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update for the purposes of a possible modification to the development regulations. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment or text amendment opportunity and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. CAR-2015-0022—Staff Analysis Page 1. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The proposal will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be included in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City. Exhibits: A. Application materials CAR-2015-0022—Staff Analysis Page 2 _y� m+r * 0 f COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 40100.1" -_ CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION o,)Jrrrxlir ,rl+Op�rcrrrrrraily PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION E Map amendment; or X❑ Text amendment APPLICANT NAME:----[ rcater Valley%.[ ort Network. Contact Person' Ginty Aftl MAicec ADDRESS:- cfo Spokane Vallet FD Hers 1 QI I A F- Broaciwa Avg STATE: C19 Y: -- cane ValleNt WA ZIP:- 992CPG PHONE: 539-325- FAX. ----5O9- CELL:---5Q9- 3235 — Q9-3235 ; '25.3295 1.1883, EMAIL: c nd+ lnn,org PROPER r?OWNER: N/A MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE: PAX: CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: — frJ PARCEL No,: —.NiA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:,-- PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: -- ZONING —ZONING DESIGNATION: - 1935 PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: •---- 19.35 045 Incentivesto DaTuelo: Affordable Housing BIRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP R TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on Separate sheet of paper); ----•----fie City of Spokane Valley should veand.incentives for t17esglevelopgent of affordable housinato increase the auailablility of affordable hpusrnct stock. Twen fo r percent of Spokane Valley hausetiolrls have an al hcomsaLL 2 JOO or less, PL-48 W.0 Page4oft SilOkane COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-lN(TIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLrcATIDN C@li11P1onily d ppo1 tunny PART III -AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicant) di I, { -4' -2-6 (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are meals truthfully a d kv th; +est of my knowledge, (Signature) (Date) PL-48 VIA A Pegs 5 0 5 SlYokane leer pCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION C:e:rrinun idy of oppe)rJarrrty B. Submit the following for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development regulations~: Completed Application Form 7+ One copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by ss4rik+ethrough and additions by underline. M One copy of a narrative describing the following: I Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health. safety, welfare, an© protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with ti-te requirements of RCVd 38 70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owners control applicable to th€ area within which the subject properly lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. A P .h e k! STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: Received by: Fee; PLUS#: File #: PL-45 Vl.c Page 0of5 City of Spokane Valley ilixert-initis#ed Amendment RerluestApplicntirrn Here Is a copy of the text to he adderilrevised: Chapter 19 35 - RESIDENTIAL DENS-ITY DENS—IBONUSES acid INCENTIVES 1A.35.010 Purpose, : aunrxc The purpose of this chapter Is to provide density incentives and other incentives to residential developments Ic help achieve consistency with the Growth Management Act,the City's Comprehensive elan,and countywide planning policies tar Spokane County. (Old.00-032§ 1,2aas) 19.36.O2O General. SHRRE The provisions of this chapter are available,at the sole discretion ofthe property owner.es incentives 10 encourage construction of housing affordable to low-and-rwedepate•inovrns households for new nnultiramlly dcveleprnonis.In exchange for residential density bonuses a.l other I+tccniives,the applicant Is required to provkta a well-designed project with additional amenities contributing to the quality or IN for Etre residents. (Ord,09-032§ 1.2909), i9,35,045 Other Ina derrelo ff r ihle hra❑sinr. i ition f I entices i Oil;+.Of Spokane Valrev—sagonbleid by State legislation(RQW 36.70A.04Q1—may nravt Other incept ej. incudlne but not limiled ta: 1.Fiht and bulk buses; 2. Foe waivers or exernettOns, man reductions; 4. Exoec+iled n rtmitting. Narratlae The proposed amendment is needed to expand affordable housing options for Spokane Valley households of Tow income,Tvrenly-four percent(24%)of households have annual Incomes of$25,09R or less and#33% have 2 or less household members(Demographics Now-Library Edition), With These additional incentives available,housing eevelopers may be more inclined to construct housing affordable to low- income households for new muttilarniiy doveoprnents, The proposed amendment provides far the public health, safely,and welfare of low income households. It does not negalively impact on the environment_ it is Consistent with the requirements of ROW 38.701 and with the City's adopted Comp Plan, Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Greater Valley Support Network APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0023 SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT: Housing Element Goal (HG-1) PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT: .Housing Policy (HP-1.7) SITE ADDRESS: N/A PARCEL No.: N/A CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A Summary of Request: The proposed amendment is a Comprehensive Plan text amendment to add a housing policy to the Housing Element which would allow a broader range of housing types to be constructed in the City of Spokane Valley (City). The housing options identified in the request include single family, multi-family, manufactured homes, micro-housing, co-housing and other types. Context: Language relating to a broad range of housing types can be found in the City's current Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Goal LUG-2 in the Comprehensive Plan states, "Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences." ." Existing Housing Policy HP-1.3 attempts to incentivize a greater diversity of housing types by stating, "Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types, costs and designs, that may include bonus incentives, clustering, and transfer of development rights." However, the identified goal and policy do not explicitly cover the housing types that are identified in the proposal. Implications: Amending the Comprehensive Plan to add a housing goal similar to the proposal would clearly state the City's intention to encourage a broader range of housing types to increase the supply of housing for more segments of the population, including low-to moderate-income individuals and families. Allowing a range of housing options and recognizing emerging housing trends could be one approach to meeting the housing needs of the City's diverse population. The proposed amendment mentions several housing options. The City of Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)currently only contains requirements for the placement of single family, multi-family and manufactured homes and is silent on other types. Micro-housing and co-housing, two emerging housing trends, are not included in the SVMC. Micro-housing is a small complete dwelling unit which contains a full kitchen and is minimum size of 220 square feet (depending on the jurisdiction). Co-housing is a cooperative living arrangement in which people build a cluster of single-family houses around a common building for sharing such necessities as meals, child care, or guest rooms. Currently, housing types not addressed in the SVMC would be precluded from development in the City until regulations are developed, if at all. If a use is not permitted in the SVMC, the applicant cannot apply until and unless the regulations are revised. If such an application were to be submitted, the City would need to address the need for specific development regulations at that time. CAR-2015-0023—Staff Analysis Page 1 Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application appears to align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the public input themes of Housing identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to consider policy language to the Housing Element to support, consider and/or encourage a broader range of housing types. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The proposal will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be included in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City. Exhibits: A. Application materials CAR-2015-0023—Staff Analysis Page 2 4000 W COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Corr uurwiey of°,dry r.'rl raify PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION Ildap amendment; or X❑Text amendment APPLICANT NAIVE; Gr p: r'fall v aGa�,�r ekwork. contact Pers rn: Cd siy Algeo MAILING ADDRESS:------do Spokane Valley Partners 1€014 E. Brr zrl•rY°ay ye, STATE: Apokina yall .-_-• -WA ZIP:----98246 PHONE!---- FAX: .11GL CELL: 509- 3235 325-3295 051.1883 -- Cindy r slhc,arm PROPERTY OWRER: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: , STATE: ZIP: PHONE: FW(; CELL: EMAIL: SITE ADDRESS: hf1A PARCEL NO.: ------Iii COMPI EHENSIVE PLAN DES GNATION: - ®aI F (3- P Il I -S PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ----HP-1.7 ZONING DESIGNATION: --- 1NiA PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: - 1fA BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet of paper). - --The G iy r,i`jx:kan ,VuIFti:i rir_rds a broad rur)ge of housin,oltyp s to serve its ever more div+ers°populations. PL-9S V1.O Page A of 5 SDoleleiNb°16% COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED REQUEST APPLICATION PART HI — AUTHORIZATION ff (signature of legal owner or appjloan t) 1, li}GLr�lelr'C.) (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. (Signature) 1 / (pate) PL-4A%Pik Page.5 or 5 lane -I,\r COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE �`J CITIZI~N-ItsITIATEIJ AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION C:0111rJ1 arr1 fry of Opporilrllfi}. B. Submit the following for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development regulations: Completed Application Form :.i One copy of the text proposed to be changed,showing deletions by strikethrough and additions by underline. One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial retalionshlp to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 367C and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified cieftoiency in the Comprehensive Plan. A SEPa e kIr STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted; Received by: Fee: PLUS#: Filo#: PL 4g V1,0 Page 3 of 5 City of Spokane ldarley Citizens-initiated Amendment Request Application Here is a copy of the text to be added: 5.4 Goals and Policies As with many cities,Spokane valley will have limited fundswith which to pursue Its housing goals.The City will have IC use it6 resources in a focused and prioritised manner to have a positive impact on the supply of affordable housing.It will be imperative that Spokane Vallyy make strategic Investments of the limited resources evetrable. Goal HG-1 Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the community and region. Policies 1-1P-1,1 Consider the economic impact of development regulations on thecost of housing. HP-1.2 Streamline-the development review process and strive to eliminate unnecessary time belays and expenses. HP-1.3 Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types,costs end designs,.that may Include bonus incentives,clustering,and transfer of development rights. HP-1.4 Encourage rnixed•use residential/commercial development In designated areas throughout the City with the use of develope, incentives and design standards. HP-1,5 Encourage the deveiopmerit of three-and four-bedroom rental units alorg transit corridors end urithin walking distance of schools and recreational facilities.. HP-1.6 Encourage the development of housing for seniors and other special populations along transit corridors and within walking distance of shopping and medical facilities. I1.P_ nv for the development of a broad ragge of housinglypes.ineludhrig,but not limled to.single family.int lti-family,manufactured tiarnes,micro-housing,ca-housing and other tykes. Narrative The proposed amendment is needed to accommodate the ever imire diverse populations of people residing in the City of Spokane Valley(/roan Demogrophfrs now-Library Editior* 24 fi of households(rave incomes of$25,1100 or less. 53%of households have 2 or less members 51.495 of households are divorced,never married,.sepa•ated or widowed. The proposed amendment provides for the publb health, safety, and welfare of low inoorne households_ It does not negatively Impact on the environment. It is corrstsienl wllh the requiremenis of RCUr!3G.74A and wilh the City adopled Comp Plan. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Greater Valley Support Network APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0024 SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT: Housing Section 5.3 (Housing and Neighborhood Issues) and Goal HG-4 and Policy HP4.1 PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT: Housing Section 5.3 (Housing and Neighborhood Issues) and Goal HG-4 and Policy HP4.1-3 SITE ADDRESS: N/A PARCEL No.: N/A CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A Summary of Request: The proposal is a Comprehensive Plan text amendment to add language to Section 5.3 (Housing and Neighborhood Issues) and establish a new housing goal with policies addressing the need to develop and establish best practices protocol for development proposals that affect neighborhoods. Context: Language discussing the need for preservation of neighborhoods, as well as housing, is found in the City's current Comprehensive Plan. Land Use Goal LUG-2 in the Comprehensive Plan states, "Encourage a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences." The proposed text amendment is requesting to add clarifying language to address early coordination of proposed housing developments with developers, neighborhoods and City. The addition of a goal and policies to establish early coordination will provide framework for transparency and coordination within government review. Implications: Amending the Comprehensive Plan as proposed will establish framework to encourage early coordination between developers and interested parties. The guidelines will serve as a foundation for smooth and timely project review. The intent for early community involvement is in line with the City's intention to encourage a broader range of housing types to increase the supply of housing for more segments of the population, including low-to moderate-income individuals and families. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application does not appear to align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the public input themes of Housing identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. CAR-2015-0024—Staff Analysis Page 1 Options for Consideration: ❑ Include application for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to consider policy language in the Housing Element to address early project coordination and communication. ❑ Defer application to future Comp Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude application from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The proposal will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be included in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City. Exhibits: A. Application materials CAR-2015-0024—Staff Analysis Page 2 P[T£f kalle pp� COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Commtroy gifjP Opparlrrrafiy PART Ii APPLICATION INFORMATION 0 Map amendment; or X0 Text amendment I APPUcANT NAME: Greater Vellqy Support Network_Contact Person: Cindy h,i er MAILING ADDRES: c!n Spokane Partners 10814 . Broadv23 Ave .STATE: CITY; _ Snakwr�e 'Valla — WA ZIP: 992Q PItUN ; -- Q9-325- FAX: 5O CELL;-- 32 5 325-.3295 951-1883 EMAIL: -- - clnch+fa5 the ori PROPERTY OWNER: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: -- PHONE: Fax: el ''E�� EMAIL: - SITE ADDRESS; IA PARCEL No - NfA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: - -- -5.3 Housin• a Nei•hborhood Issu s fi 4 CGJOIS PCidcieS PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UESMNATION: --- --5.3• Add HO-4 . d HP •,1 ZONING DESI.HATIoN: -- .-NdA PROPOSED Z0111 NO DESIGNATION: ----hlIR BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attact1 full explanation on separate sheet of paper): WE r rope a:lie creation and adoptioi of a Best Practic s 'rotocor for develra auLienk proposals affectiri.g rtie!ghborhsad living environments. PL-4&v1.0 Pale 4 or 5 SVolrane par6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ".T CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT RECIUEST APPLICATION Cam+i isn ry oflJ�sru�� PART III - AUTHORIZATION { (Signature of legal owner or applicant) in , —ec> , (print name) swear or affirm that the above responses are male truthfully and the befit of my knowledge_ (Signature) (Date) PL-4$V1.41 Page 6 or 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDA-E CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION CvnonimirycfOppo'Ii niDi B. Submit the following for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development regulations: Completed Application Form g One copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by str-lketlirough and additions by underline. Oi One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safely, welfare. and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of ROW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; o. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's coritro'applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e, The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Corrlpreherlsive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Bate Submitted: Received by: Fee: PLUS#: Flie#: PL-4s uy.4 Page 3 orb City of Spokane Valley Citizen-initiated Amendment Request Application Here Is a copy of the text to be added: 5.3 Housing&Neighborhood issues In common with many urbanizing areas,creation of higher density residential development close to existing neighborhoods is viewed with suspicion and concern. Tete concerns of residents may be alleviated If proper consideration is given to the reservation character and vitality of existing nei hhorhoods b establisiin and adherin to a Best Practices Development Protocalprapastng any develotrrnelt orolect that affects the neijhberhaod living environment or property values.The S okane Valle aeveio me t P atacol is intended to encourage early neighborhood involvement acid stron I su orts and enecaura es co structive diaie ue betNeen deveir, ars and nei iaaorl�oods. Establishi ratcacoi that encoura es collective dialo ue and skillful review of ro osed development projects can uitimatel crew e a founda Ion for smtroth timely and on-budget housing development projects. Similarly,design regulations which provide adequate transition between different uses will be essential in preserving both existing and new development. 5.4 Goals and Policies As with many cities, Spokane Valiey will have limited funds with which to pursue its housing goals.The City will have to use its resources In a focused and prioritized manner to have a positive impact on the supply ofaffordable housing. It will be imperative that Spokane Valley make strategic investments of the limited resources availabie, Coal HG.4 Encourage Developers and Neihlaorhoods to use a Best practices Development Protocol to be written into the Cltw of 5nokane Valle "s devele rrEerit ordinances.This protocol encourages and identifies Ruldelines for developers, neighborhoods,and cityPolicy makers,The Best Practices Protocol is intended to ensure that neighborhood and community concerns are voicedearl r_in the development process. Early constructive,respectful and educational dialogue will assist in timely prolect completion and ositivel im act the€ievelo ament •rv■osalsafecting the living environments,property values and other neighborhood concerns, Policies HP-4.1 Assist S okane Valley residents to establish a cominuni y Neiebborhoed Association. Assist in identi In fund le sources and ntentla stakeholders o assist in Goal HG-4. HP-4.2 Ensure that ,Ludelines are established and adhered to that creat- rnn$tructive communication between developers and neighborhoods ensurint this best ossihle outcome for the Spokane Valley community. HP-4.3 Ensure clarity between Developers and Neighborhood Associations regardine the established Neighborhood Proposal Review Process Narrative Development projects have been rejected after neighborhood residents voiced concerns later in the project review process. 2) CPA-05-12:Greg Arger-240 unit apartment complex near Broadway and Conklin. 2) Catholic Charities:proposed charge-tow-density to medium-density residential 38-42 unit complex for senior residents. The amendment being preposed to Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan is the creation and adoption of a Best Practic.es Protocol for development proposals affecting neighborhood living environments and property values. Developing and instituting a protocol for proposed projects will identify early neighborhood communication and involvement as a practice that is best for the City of Spokane Valley developers,neighborhoods and city policy makers.The protocol Is intended to be a guide with established options for all parties Involved to use in the discussion and skillful review of development proposals. The Best Practices Protocol should include; Proposal Review Process, Neighborhood Readiness,Developer Readiness, Ground Raffles, Respectful and Successful Communications and an Evaluation of the Protocol Process, Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Naomi Eisentrager APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0025 PROPERTY OWNER: N/A SITE ADDRESS: Manufactured Home Parks sites PARCEL No.: N/A CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Various PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: MHP ZONING DESIGNATION: Various PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: MHP Summary of Request: The proposal seeks to designate appropriate areas for the preservation of mobile and manufactured home parks (MHP). Designating such areas requires the creation of a Manufactured Home Park land use designation or overlay and an implementing MHP zoning district or overlay. Context: The City of Spokane Valley contains over 30 manufactured home parks with approximately 1200 spaces. Manufactured Home Park is an allowed use in R-2, R-3, R-4, MF-1, and MF-2 zones, subject to supplemental regulations in SVMC 19.40.130. By definition a manufactured home park is created through a binding site plan. Spaces are designated in the site plan for the placement of manufactured homes. The spaces are retained under single ownership and rented to manufactured home owners. The manufactured home owner does not have ownership of the land beneath the home. If the property owner chooses to redevelop the property from a MHP to another permitted use the home owners within the MHP must relocate the manufactured home to another location. The proposal would limit the land uses permitted within the MHPs to manufactured homes. Implications: The proposal would preserve the existing MHPs by restricting the type of development that can occur within the existing MHPs to mobile homes uses. Homeowners within the MHPs would have assurance that the park property would not be redeveloped causing them to relocate the home. Property owners would not be permitted to redevelop the property to other uses without going through a public process to rezone their property. Property owners may not realize the "highest and best" use of their property if they are required to maintain the property as a MHP. Furthermore, the City would be creating a zone based on a housing typology. Creating a new zoning designation for manufactured home parks would also require modifications to the zoning code and development regulations. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application does not align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application does align with the Housing theme identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. CAR-2015-0025—Staff Analysis Page 1 Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to better determine if the MHP zone or overlay is an appropriate designation and what the full implication of such an overlay may be to property owners. . Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of MHP's, including identification of the need for more or less MHP's zoned parcels, including what the proposal will mean for land capacity. Analysis will also include an assessment of the vicinity to determine if such an overlay would be compatible with the surrounding uses. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The parcels will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be re-designated in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City on an area-wide basis. Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property CAR-2015-0025—Staff Analysis Page 2 Sboilune -, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INI` 1ATEDAMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Crunniar ryof rarJfly PART II - APPLICATION INFORMATION Map amendment; or Next amendment APPLICANT NAME:. L_I a �' c',�� MAILING ADDRESS: 3 ! kl{ 4 i t r ct CITY, ii,,A. I 'S . 4-- _ STATE:ILC SII'; C. Ct r ,2 7 PHONE: LT:+ ` 1 14x: ] CELL: EMAIL J (S ) 014C6 s L 1 P I PROPERTY OWNER MAILING ADDRESS; CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE; FAX: CELL: EMAIL: U� �4l SITE ADDRESS' I i r , a - ` PARCEL NO.; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN GESJGNATIEJVii: l L PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION' ZONING DESIGNATION: PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: BRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR KAP ORTEKTAMENf]MPN1(ettaCh full explanation on separate sheet i f ed paper). t 'C) , •t 1 F 44 1 d1G (JI1 -- , A hL Imo "_ 4 I rt 1 L' i `\ 6 4 - 4 1 t til 'IA I4 0 A AA I. L - ' • \--Q" lic, ' lk ' -Q_ ik b C) - i Qtil 6 Sg, I '.;:.e I ._ , I ,i II il ,_1I:11, hf'Rif) f2015 Page al 419 ow , am COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE d� CITIZEN-INITIATED At41ENDNIENT REQUEST APPLICATION Comm ,wi Uf OJaf orstrrun' PART III AUTHORIZATION (Signature of legal owner or applicgnt) 4 [ t 1c . i1). C 4 pr;nt narre} swear or al:frrm th8t the above responses are made tnthfttlky and to the best of m newledge. (Sig naive) (Date) IJL-48 Vi.Q Wage S of 5 *Mune COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION Colirinrefirry qrOpptwanify B. Submit the following for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development ulations: Completed Application Form One copy of the text proposed to be changed, showing deletions by stril gh and additions by underline. One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2 Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below, a The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with, the requirements of ROW 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property ties; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan, STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: All Received by: , i T Fee: t #: File #: Lam-20 t<'- IC Z„ PL-49 V9.0 Page 3 of 5 CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT Y OF1�� Sj1ne REQUEST APPLICATION 40,001FU\ialky Community Development— Planning Division C arter+�tririh'rf Opportunity 509.720.5310 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Walley WA 99206 509.720.5310$ Fax: 509.688,0037 41 ptannlne spokanevalle,urg COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. On January 6, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council approved a Public Participation Program (PPP) outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprehensive Plan update process. As indicated in the PPP, arl citizens, neighborhood organizations, or others may submit an application to propose changes to the Comprehensive Fran, land use map, zoning map, or development regulations. These requests are referred tc as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests (CARS) and wirf be evaluated for consideration by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. in order to be considered for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, CARs shall be filed no later than March 31, 2015_ Complete CAR applications will be reviewed for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update work program, and will be processed based upon established criteria as well as the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the proposal. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or • Defer the CAR(s)to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17,80.140; Or * Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. The application period will commence at the first Comprehensive Plan update public meeting on January 28, 2015 and will close en March 31, 21015: Submittals received after the deadline shall not be considered. 2. Initial Review_ Following the closing of the application period, the City shall review each application to determine whether to include the proposal in the Comprehensive Plan update work program. Staff shall review each application and prepare a report to the Planning Commission, which will make a recommendation to the City Council_ The City Council shall consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and make a decision on which applications to include iii the Comprehensive Plan update work program in May 2015. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or * Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140; or • Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. The application(s), if included in the work program, shall be consolidated with the City's Comprehensive Plan update work program and will be subject to Steps 3 through 7 as stated below. 3. Staff Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report shall analyze whether each proposal included in the work program meets the amendment criteria included in this application and if so, how it meets those criteria_ All application documents and staff reports shall be available for public review. 4. Planning Commission Public lfearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment, P L-45 V1.0 Page 1 of 5 IIY S! COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE a CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION 'otrMunrry o"(.LP •1 Wily 5. City Council Review and Decision. The City Council shall review the Planning Commission's recommendation and will then adopt the recommendation or amend it. 6. Appeal Procedures. City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, pursuant to ROW 36.70A_290(2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Lori Barlow, Senior Planner (I_barliwrt sprk.aneva+lr,p ryrri) PA 31 J — 31E J .D_MATEF IAL "TME PLANNING DIVISION SHALL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED" A. For map amendments: ❑ Completed Application Form SEPA Checklist: One copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Environmental Checklist, including optional Non-Project Action supplemental form. (P'Iote: Any previous environmental dccurrnents that are relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) 12 Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notification (Please note° Co not submit the notice of public hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses sluff be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public hearing.) ❑ One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment. 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below: a The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirernents of RCW 36_70A and with the CRY'S adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the propertyowner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Flan 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors a. The effect upon the physical environment; b The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c, The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods: d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density. and the demand for such land: g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan_ PL-ea111,4 Page 2of5 Text proposed to he changed: Land Use Desie tiations 2.5.X Mobile Home Parks De tii mate �a r o riate treas rar the reservation o mobile and maim actured home parks', Manufactured and/or Mobile Home Parks provide affordable housing to metre City residents. In many eases,they provide the opportunity of home ownership to house-holds which cannot afford topurchase other tyi es cf housing..' 4`hen existing manufactured home parks are redeveloped many homeowners are unable to movetheir homtes to other sites. Additional]y, redeveloyed mobile and manufactured home narks are generally not replaced by new parks within the City, resulting in a net loss of this type of housing.] I. Why the proposed amendment as needed, and the potential lane/use impacts if approved; Mobile/manufactured housing is the largest source of unsubsidized housing in the country, In the City of Spokane Valley these homes make up 7% of the city's affordable housing stock! The majority of these homes are in mobile home parks where home owners maintain their property while paying Iot rent for the land under the home. These communities are essential in providing affordable home ownership opportunities to low- income families and senior citizens in Spokane Valley. Unfortunately, the immobility of the homes (once hi place, only 1. in every 100 mobile homes is ever moved), the high cost of relocation of a home, and the limited financial resources of many mobile home owners has led to a well-documented problem when the owner of a mobile home park wants to convert the property to a dil erer t use.3 When a landowner decides to close a park or convert it to another use the financial burden of moving or demolishing a mobile home rests on the home owner. The Department of Commerce estimates the cost of moving a single-section manufactured home to be $7,500.4 In many cases the cost to relocate a home is much more than this. Thus moving the home is financially difficult, in some cases impossible, given the low- income status of the home owner. Home owners then have to abandon their homes. They lose their largest asset, their home, leaving them homeless or seeking subsidized housing. City of Spokane Mobile Home Parks Application submitted November 8: 201 14 Spokane Valley Compr .hensive Plan; 5.2.4 Housing Inventory Paraphrased from the 9`1'Circuit Coon of Appeals ruling on Latwrei Park Community v. City of Tumwater ``Chamber or-Commerce Retucaticn Assistance Fund: hula:Ovirme v.commerce.wa.oviSory cestindividualassistancefliousingirageslt'telocati€snAssistance.aspx The hardship of moving from a mobile or manufactured home park is difficult for the residents and members to bear. The state legislature recognized this back in 1990 when they adopted 1113 2907 (Mobile IIome Relocation Bill). While the state still offers relocation assistance, it can still be a lengthy and costly process even with help.5 This problem is further magnified due to the Valley's narrow range of replacement housing options. When a community closes there is no like affordable housing made available to replace the units lost. The proposed amendment would create a new Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation as well as a new zoning designation for existing manufactured/mobile home parks. This change is necessary to protect residents of manufactured and/or mobile home parks from potential relocation as a result of land owner sales. According to the Seattle Times, from 2003 to 2007 Mobile Home Park closures in the State of Washington were 13.6 per year.' A zoning ordinance would add an extra Iayer of sertrtiny to land sales or redevelopment efforts that could displace manufactured and/or mobile home park residents! There are two proposals being put forward that center on manufactured and mobile home communities. Both proposals are supported by manufactured and mobile home owners in the City. Passage of this amendment would be preferred because it is proactive against park closures whereas the second, weaker proposal is reactive. Because the amendment seeks to preserve existing housing, land use impact would remain the same. ,e. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below; a. The proposed amendment hears a substantial relationship to the public health, softy, welfare, and protectin of the environment; Manufactured and/or mobile homes provide residents of the City of Spokane Valley with another option for lower income, higher density housing. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau estimates that monthly housing costs for Metro Manufactured Homes are $816 less per month for owner-occupants and $316 less per month for renters.' Subsidized housing programs cost jurisdictions money and time in coordinating with local, state, and federal funders. Existing mobile and manufactured home parks in Spokane Valley provide 1,199 unsubsidized spaces.9 That's 1,199 affordable housing units the city does nut have to pay for. By preserving these 5 In April 2013, the Department of Commerce issued a memorandum that noted,"We are unable to estimate how long the reimbursement process will take due to the fluctuation of the revenue smite."(See attached). It?tE}_.'4e<<iilc[itrles.cosyliinijispio io ijheouutsnews'2Qt3432 `06.1_ii hllrark.021 liriul City of Spokane Mobile Home Parks Application submitted November 8.2014 _ $Consumer Financial Protection Bureau(2014),114am facturedf(ror4.sing corrsrcmerflnarrce in The United States,pg. 22.(See: lute. tiles.cursinnert nance.g rurfe20140 st'p a__ rad facture(1elt«t Oft. 'w) Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan;5.2.4 Housing Inventory. communities the City saves federal, city, and tax payer money through protecting unsubsidized housing. The amendment would also protect against homelessness by allowing home owners to remain in their homes. With homelessness reduced public health and safety is maintained. Manufactured homes also provide a benefit to the community through their small carbon footprint- One of the city's core values is to focus on the future through stewardship of land and resources. According to a 2012 study manufactured homes have an overall environmental impact that is less than half that of a Single- Family HoEne.it) b. The proposed amendment is consistent with Ow requirements of RCW 36.70 4 and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan,- The lan,The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.71/A and with several goals outlined in the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan. It encourages the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population. As noted earlier, manufactured and mobile homes are traditionally less expensive than single family homes and can accommodate families aswell as seniors. The amendment promotes a variety of residential density and horsing types (Goal I.LJG-2). The city recognizes the balance of high density housing stock "tends to be two and three story apartment buildings" (SVCP 5.2.4 Housing Stock).`i'hese communities offer a higher density alternative to apartments or single family homes. It is consistent with the City's goal to meet the housing needs of special populations (Goal HG-3). Manufactured housing is an attractive home ownership option for senior citizens and people on disability. Out of the 31 existing manufactured housing communities in the Valley 10 are specifically designated 55+communities. The limited income of this population would make losing their homes a financial hardship. It also encourages the preservation of existing housing stock and housing stock diversity (GMA Goal and Goal HG-I). The creation of a new zoning designation for manufactured and mobile home parks would accomplish all of these goals simply by protecting existing housing. r° "Sue ainabrtrty in il9arn rrcturcd Home Canornnoi7i nes:Cost-E9eclive Energy Water and Cow rrrrnrty trafr, b arc iris Strategists it?AMtatilliz Long-terra Valve" c, The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in cond/tionss beyond the property owners control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; Because mohileinianufactured home owners rent the land under their homes any decision by the park owner to change the use of land is beyond their control. While the amendment allows the preservation or low cost housing it also allows the continuation of a profitable business, resulting in a win for everyone. The park owner is able to continue to operate their successful business, the home owners are able to preserve their affordable housing for themselves and future generations of home owners and the City meets all the criteria of the Housing Element of its Comprehensive Plan. d The proposed amendment corrects an obvious error; and The obvious error is the fact that these mobile home park businesses arc not zoned in a way that guarantees the business will continue. Discontinuance would result in displacement of over 1,100 households. e. The proposed amendment addresses on identified deficiency in the C..'omprehensive Placa_ As stated earlier, the city recognizes in its Comprehensive Plan that the balance of housing stock tends to be apartment buildings. There is a lack of affordable housing options for low income families and seniors. Manufactured and mobile homes offer variety to a housing mix that lacks diversity. When a community is converted to another use home owners are displaced and what little variety in housing stock the City now has would be lost. The proposed amendment would ensure that the City doesn't lose this valuable resource. Citizen-Initiated Amendment Request Review APPLICANT NAME: Naomi Eisentrager APPLICATION No.: CAR-2015-0026 PROPERTY OWNER: N/A SITE ADDRESS: Manufactured Home Parks sites PARCEL No.: N/A CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: N/A ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: N/A Summary of Request: The proposal seeks to add specific language to the City's development regulations. The language would require Manufactured Home Park (MHP)owners to establish a Relocation Report Plan (RRP). The RRP would describe how the MHP owner would comply with Washington State Law relating to mobile home relocation assistance. The RRP would require the MHP owner to assist each mobile home park tenant household to relocate, in addition to making any state or federal required relocation payments. Such assistance would include providing tenants with an inventory of relocation resources, referring tenants to public and private subsidized housing resources, helping tenants obtain and complete the necessary application forms for state-required relocation assistance, and helping tenants to move the mobile homes from the mobile home park. The proposed language would require City staff to administer the RRP provisions and issue a certificate of completion for the RRP prior to the MHP owner taking action to close or rezone the MHP. Context: The City of Spokane Valley contains over 30 manufactured home parks with — 1,200spaces. By definition a manufactured home park is created through a binding site plan. Spaces are designated in the site plan for the placement of manufactured homes. The spaces are retained under single ownership and rented to tenant manufactured home owners. The tenant manufactured home owner does not have ownership of the land beneath the home. If the property owner chooses to redevelop the property from a MHP to another permitted use the tenant home owners within the MHP must relocate the manufactured home to another location. Relocation can be difficult for homeowners to accomplish for reasons of manufactured home age, expense and space availability. Requirements for MHP owner relocation notification and assistance have been established by the Washington State Legislature through RCW 59.20 Manufactured /Mobile Home Landlord-Tenant Act (formerly Mobile Home Landlord-Tenant Act)and RCW 59.21 Mobile Home Relocation Assistance. The two laws establish the park closure notification and relocation assistance burden placed upon the MHP landlord. Based on a first-come, first-serve basis and the availability of funding, MHP tenants may receive up to twelve thousand dollars for a double-wide home and up to seven thousand dollars for a single-wide home. The MHP landlord must notify the Director of the Department of Commerce and all tenants of the MHP twelve months prior to park closure or change of use. The notification must be in writing, posted at all park entrances, and recorded in the county in which the MHP resides. The city has recently completed a code text amendment (CTA)to the MHP Regulations to establish a regulatory environment that supports MHP operations for MHP owners. The CTA was in response to CAR-2015-0026—Staff Analysis Page 1. requests from MHP residents to establish a MHP zone. At that time the Council declined to take that action. Implications: The proposal would create significant burden on MHP owners to assist MHP tenants to relocate their homes when the owner wishes to close the park or undertake a change of use. The proposed language would add a second, local layer of regulation in addition to the state regulation. The language would also place burden on the City to administer the additional regulation and certify the completion of an RRP. Liability for certifying the plans would fall to the City. The proposed language would provide significant protection and assistance to MHP tenants should the MHP owner choose to close the park or change the use. The RRP would provide specific requirements and responsibilities that the MHP owner would undertake to assist MHP tenants with relocation. Focus Areas and Public Input Themes: The application does not appear to align with the specific focus areas identified as part of the overall Comprehensive Plan Update process. The application appears to align with the Housing theme identified in the Community Vision Report developed through the public meetings. Options for Consideration: ❑ Include proposal for further review The CAR will be included in the scope of analysis for the Comprehensive Plan update to determine if an RRP is an appropriate regulation to be added to the MHP regulations. Analysis will focus on the current supply and demand of MHP zoning, including identification of the need for more or less zoned parcels. ❑ Defer proposal to future Comprehensive Plan Amendment The CAR will be deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan amendment and analyzed at that time. The proposal will be included in a future "docket"when the City determines it is appropriate to analyze. ❑ Exclude proposal from further review The CAR will be excluded from further analysis in the Comprehensive Plan update. The request will not be analyzed specifically and may or may not be considered in this process, depending upon the overall update and changes made by the City . Exhibits: A. Current Comprehensive Plan map B. Current Zoning map C. Aerial Map of subject property CAR-2015-0026—Staff Analysis Page 2 Stliiikane oUt+1PRENENSIVE PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AErrNi7MENT REQUEST APPLICATION CthR11121TOir rj,of Op/HAI/may PART III — APPLICATION INFORMATION El Map arnendriient; or MText amendrnent APPLICANT1� ¢ : LI ' + C3 = ` 'IUAILING ADDRESS: r} ! UL ) -, .- , PHONE: tl': ` A0 FAx: CELL: EMAIL: 1'S S VCat-.L 5• ' PL PROPERTY OWNER` MAILING ADDRESS: CITY: STATE: ZIP: PHONE; I FAX: CELL: EMAIL: S C.: SITE ADORES S 4A nC f - PA REEL T1}[?.: CoMPREHIm sIIIE PLAN DEsicNAIION: I�C L') PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PI AN 1Es cNATIOFf: ZONING DESIGNATION: PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: f EIRIEFLY EXPLAIN REASON FOR MAP OR TEXT AMENDMENT(attach full explanation on separate sheet paper)V L) )U Ir1. _ \ (�\f s tCV ' I$3 ct_lit 61 act(){1 Ti)... _1. '�. ( d ` _ ile._ 4_0' - C \ i . k _ I 'm , 0 1 C-D Et ), ' Li' L APR 0 .- 0l!1 PLAD V1,1) Page a of pCOMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Stiaane �'.;x CITIZEN-INI fIATED AMENDWI NT REQUEST APPLICATION OfpOrf Miry PART III — AUTHORIZATION {Signature of legal owner or applicant) i /0006 )/il r C_ ; = G'4 ( print name} swear or affirm that the above responses are ma0e truthfully and to the best of rnn nowledge_ (signature) (Date) Pt-43 V11 Page 5 or 5 0.6 S 1eikane QMPREIjENSIVE PLAN UPDATE ��. CITIZEN-INITIATt D AMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION rrrrnfy of Opp iiri tty 13. Submit the following for text amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development uIations: Completed Application Farm One copy of the text proposed to be changed,showing deletions by 6triketh-001.1911 and additions by underline. One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. Why the proposed amendment is needed, and the potential land use impacts if approved; 2_ Describe how the proposed alriendrrent meets the approval criteria below; a The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment, b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 30_70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the properly owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious Error; and a The proposed amendment addresses en identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF USE ONLY Date Submitted: , VII Received by: C Fee: N t P7S _ File#: p1.,' - • . - •• Page 3 of 5 PL-48 V1.0 CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT sook#44%, REQUEST APPLi ATI N Viiliey F Community Development- Planning Division 4•••••* 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 + Spokane Valley WA 99206 CUM Witty af Opportrueir4 509.720.5310 # Fax: 539.6135.0Ct37 # i laming@spokarievall€y.org mow COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PERIODIC UPDATE CITIZEN-INITIATED AMENDMENT REQUEST The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City to periodically review and update its Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. Orli January b, 2015, the Spokane Valley City Council approved a Public Participation Program (PPP) outlining opportunities for public involvement in the current Comprehensive Plan update process. As indicated in the PPP, all citizens, neighborhood organizations, or others may submit an application to propose changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land use map, zoning map, or development regulations. These requests are referred to as Citizen-initiated Amendment Requests(CARS) and will be evaluated for consideration by City staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. In order to be considered for inclusion in the City's Comprehensive Plan update, CARs shall be filed no later than March 31, 2015_ Complete CAR applications will be reviewed for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update work program, and will be processed based upon established criteria as well as the City's ability and level of resources necessary to review the proposal. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA, the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s)for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process; or • Defer the CAR(s) to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80,140: or • Deny the CAR(s)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. PROCEDURES 1. Application Period. The application period will commence at the first Comprehensive Pan update public meeting on January 2$, 2015 and will close on March 91, 2015. Submittals received after the deadline shall not be considered. 2. Initial Review. Following the closing of the application period, the City shall review each eppl:cation to determine whether to include the proposal in the Comprehensive Plan update work program. Staff shall review each application and prepare a report to the Planning Commission, which will make a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council shall consider the Planning Commission's recommendation and make a decision on which applications to include in the Comprehensive Plan update work program in May 2015. Unless a proposed amendment fulfills a particular duty under the GMA. the City has broad discretion to take one of the following actions: • Accept the CAR(s) for inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process or ▪ Defer the CAR(s)to a future amendment docket pursuant to SVMC 17.80.140; or • Deny the CARS)from inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan update process. The application(s), if included in the work program, shall be consolidated with the City's Comprehensive Plan update work program and will be subject to Steps 3 through 7 as stated below. 3. Staff Report. Spokane Valley Planning Staff will prepare a report and recommendation to the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The report shall analyze whether each proposal included in the work program meets the amendment criteria included in this application and, if so, how it meets those criteria. Ali application documents and staff reports shall be available for public review. 4. Planning Commission Public Hearing. The Spokane Valley Planning Commission shall conduct a formal public hearing on all proposed amendments. The Commission shall consider amendments individually and shall examine the cumulative impacts of all amendments collectively. The Commission shall prepare one combined recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council, including findings on each individual proposed amendment. Page'i of 5 P Iii,o Set rekkane t1e COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE T • hAMENDMENT REQUEST APPLICATION 'ORID itnili elf Vpportt>nUy S. City Council Review and Decision The City Council shall review the Planning Commission's recommendation and will then adopt the recommendation or amend it. 6. Appeal Procedures_ City Council decisions on Comprehensive Plan amendments may be appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board within 60 days of publication of notice of adoption, pursuant to RCW 36.70A,29O 2). 7. Staff Contact. Questions may be directed to Lori Barlow, Senior Planner (1„ Traci,?@ Ca°`,eyol ',.u•_y}- PART I - REQUIRED MATERIAL "THE PLANNING DIVISION SHALL NOT ACCEPT YOUR APPLICATION IF THE REQUIRED MATERIALS ARE NOT INCLUDED' A. For map amendments: ❑ Completed Application Form SEPA Checklist: One copy of completed State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) Environmental Checklist. including optional Non-Project Action supplemental form, (Note: Any previous environmental documents that am relevant to this project should be included and may be adopted by reference.) ❑ Notice of Public Hearing packet for 400-foot notiification. (Please note- Do notsobmit the notice of pubfic hearing packet until you have been contacted by the City. Addresses shall be current within 30 days of the Planning Commission public bearing,) El One copy of a narrative describing the following: 1. State the reason for the Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 2. Describe how the proposed amendment meets the approval criteria below: a The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCVV 36.70A and with the City's adopted Comprehensive Ran; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 3. Describe how the proposal addresses the following specific factors: a_ The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d_ The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation, parks, recreation and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, city and region; 1_ The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density. and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Gcrriprehensive Plan PL-4BV1.4 Paga2of5 Tod proposed to he changed: 19,40.X Eviction notices for change of use or closure of a mobile home parks A. Before a mobile home +urk owner ma issue eviction notices .ursuant to a closure orchan e of use under Chaster 59.21 RCW the mobile home Dark owner must first submit to staff and de artment best determined by the city) a relocation report and plan that meets the.requirements of SVMC 19.40.X,_ If applying for a change of use. the mobile home park owner shall submit the relocation rer3pit and plan Nether with all other necessary applications. Once the (staffany! department best determined by the city determines that the relocation report and Ilan meets the rc;uirements of SMC 19.40. [, he or she shall sta.rnp his or leer anpro 'al on the relocation resort and 'Ian and return a coof the aF Droved plan to the mobile home park owner. If the staff and desartorent best determined b the cit determines that the relocation re Fort and plan does not meet the re uirements of`SVMC 19.40.3hie or she ma re uire the mobile home 'ark ownett to amend or suF ;lement the relocation resort and plan as necessary to corn 1 with this chs ter before approvingit. 13,140 sooner than upon as Froyal of the relocation re Dirt and clan the owner of the mobile home .ark ma issue the twelve 12 month eviction notice to the mobile home Dark tenants.T'he eviction notice shall corn sly with RCW 59.20.080 and 59.21.030 as amended. No mobile home owner who rents a mobile home lot ma be evicted until the twelve 12 month notice seriod ex tires exce a pursuant to the State Mobile Home Landlord-Tenant Act,Chapter 59.20 RCW. 19A0.X Relocation re art and lan. A, The relocation report and plan shall describe how the mobile horde .ark owner intends to cum lv with Cha iters 59.20 and 59.21 RCW relatini to mobile home relocation assistance and with SVMC 19.40.X through 19.40.X. The relocatior__� .ort and plan must piovide that the mobile home park owner will assist each mobile home ',ark tenant household to relocate, in addition to making.any state or federal re aired relocation a menta. Such assistance rrrrsst include ro ridin ter nts an inventor of relacafion resourccsreferrinn tenants to alterative public and private subsidized housing resources, het sin_ tenants obtain and corns lete the necessai at plication forms for state-r,suited relocation assistance, and hel in tenants to move the mobiLc lir me. from the mobile home rk. Further the relocation resort and Flan shall contain the followin_ information: 1. The name, address, and faiaihe cepri osition for each mobile home park tenant household,and the ex.iration date of the lease for each household• 2. `fie condition sire ownershi, status HUD and State De Fartment of Labor and industries certification status and probable niobilit of each mobile hone occu• in_ a mobile home.lot: 3. Copies of all lease of_rear_!agreement forms the mobile harrre ark owner currently has in place with mobile home nark tenants, 4. To the extent mobile home Dark tenants voluntaril make such information available, a confidential listin_ of current month! - housin• costs includi _ rent or martaayments and utilities, fur each mobile home park tenant household 5. To the extent mobile home .ark tenants voluntaril make such information available a confidential listitt of± oss annual income for each mobile home lark tenant household- 6, An inventory of relocation resources, including available mobile home spaces in Spokane and surrounding area c ulltre5;. 7. Actions the mobile home Bark owner will take to refer mobile home 'ark tenants to alternative pal}lfc and private subsidised hoe ing r seaurces. 8. Actions the mobile home ark owner will take to assist mobile home 'ark tenants to move the mobile homes from the mobile home park; 9. Other actions the owner will take to minimize the hardship mobile home park tenant households suffer as a result of the closure or conversion of the mobile home park;and 10. A statement of the anticipated timin&for park closure. B. The(gaff and department best determined by the city) may require the mobile home park owner to designate a relocation coordinator to administer the provisions of the relocation report and plan and work with the mobile home park tenants,the housing and human services office, and other city and state offices to ensure compliance with the relocation report and plan and with state laws governing mobile home park relocation assistance. eviction notification, and landlordjeriant responsibilities. C. The owner shall_make available to any mobile home park tenant residing in the mobile home park cosies of the +ro'lased relocation re I ort and +Ian with confidential information deleted. Within fourteen (14) days of the(staff and department best determined by the eitv)'s approval of the relocation retort and plan, a copy of the approved relocation report and plan shall be mailed b the owner to each mobile home park tenant. D. The mobile honepaark owner shall update with the(stuff and do artmcnt best determined by the city) the information required under this section to include any chane, ofeircurrrst noes occurring after submission of the relocation report and plan that affects the relocation report and plan's_implementation 19.40.X Certificate of come letion of the relocation report and plan. No mobile home park owner may close a mobile home park..or obtain final at proval of a comprehensive plan or zoning redesignation until the mobile home park owner obtains a certificate of completion from the(staff and department best determined by the city). The (staff and department beg determined b , the city shall issue a certificate of comcompletion osti if satisfied that the owner has complied with the provisions of an ❑pproued relr cation report andplan, the eviction notice requirements_ of RCW 59.20;080 arid 59.21.030,the relocation assistance requirements of RC W 59.21.021and any additional requirements imposed in connection with requiredcity applications. 19.40.X Notice of provisions. it is unlawful for any party to sell, lease, or rent any mobile home or mobile home park rental space without providing a coin of any relocation report and plan to the prospective purchaser, lessee, or renter, and advisin_ the same in writin, of the :tuvisions of SVT\IIC 19.40.X throw 19.40.X and the status of any relocation report and plan. 19.40.X Administration. The (staff and department best determined by the city).shall administer and enforce SV MMC 19,40.X through 19.40.X. Whenever an owner or an owner's agent fails to comply with the provisions of SVMC 19.40.X through I 9.40.X, the following Data ocggr,; A. The (staff and department best determined by the city.) may deny,revoke, or condition a certificate of completion. a permit, or another approval; B. Any other appropriate city official may condition any permit or other approval upon the owner's successful completion of remedial actions deemed(necessz ry by the (staff and department best. determined by the city) to carry out the purposes of SVMC 19.40.X through 19.40.X. I "'Text take from the Kent City Code Chapter 12.05 Mobile Home Parks I. Why the proposed amendment is needed and the potential lanes use impacts i{approved,` Mobilelmaniufactured housing is the largest source of unsubsidized housing in the country. It provides home ownership opportunities to senior citizens,persons with disabilities,and low- income families, The majority of these homes are in mobile home parks where home owners maintain their property while paying lot rent for the land under the home. As quoted by the 9th Circuit Court"mobile homes are largely immobile as a practical matter, because the cost of moving one is often a significant fraction of the value of the mobile home itself. They are generally placed permanently in parks; once in place, only about 1 in every 100 mobile homes is ever moved."' When a landowner decides to close a park orconvert it to another use the financial burden of moving ar demolishing a mobile home rests on the home owner. The Department of Commerce estimates the cost of moving a single-section manufactured home to be $7,500.3 in many cases the cost to relocate a home is much more than this. Moving a home can be incredibly burdensome financially, in some cases impossible, given the low-income status of the home owner. Home owners then have to abandon their homes. They lose their largest asset, their home, leaving them homeless or seeking subsidized housing. The proposed amendment would require a manufacturedlmobile home park owner to prepare a city approved relocation plan for manufactured home owners in his or her community before he or she could distribute the 1 year notice of park closure required by state law. The plan would include information on who to contact to move a home and other possible options in the event the house could not be moved. The purpose of the plan is to provide home owners with necessary information to help them prepare successfully for relocation as well as offering them more time over and above the statutory required 12 month notice. Earlier notice would provide home owners more time to prepare financially and emotionally,with the hope that homelessness for displaced home owners would be reduced. This proposal is one of two being put forward that center on manufactured and mobile home communities. The amendment reacts to a negative situation instead of preventing it. Although manufactured housing community preservation through zoning is the much more preferred option,park closures do happen and we ask that this proposal be considered as well. The amendment does not change the current use of the land in a mobile/manufactured home park; therefore there are no estimated land use impacts 2_ Describe how the proposed amendment'rtteels the approval criteria below, cr. The proposed amendment bears t substantial relationship to the public health, safely, welfare, and protection of the environment; Subsidized housing programs cost jurisdictions money and time in coordinating with local, state, and federal funders. 1,199 unsubsidized spaces arc available in 31 mobile/manufactured 2 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.Laurel Park Community v. City of Tumwater Opinion pg.4 Chamber of Com nerve Relocation Assistance Fund: http://www.carnmercema,goviServicesf individualassistanceiliousing/Pages/RelocationAssistance.aspx plan program that would give displaced mobile and manufactured home owners more time and needed housing option information to avoid homelessness. e The proposed amendment addresses an identlr`ed deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan: Currently the Comprehensive Plan has little reference to manufactured and mobile home parks, it has no reference to the threat of homelessness that manufactured/mobile home owners face daily, since a 12 month notice of closure could be served on them at any time.. As stated above, the proposed amendment addresses the vulnerability of these 1,199 households in Spokane Valley by establishing a relocation report and plan program that would give displaced mobile and manufactured home owners more time and needed housing option information to avoid homelessness. Planning Commission Citizen - Initiated Amendment Requests Public Hearing May 14, 2015 — b:00 p.m. City Hall DIscusslork Points Part I : Comp Plan Update Process Overview Part II : CAR Application Review Process Overview of Review Process and Next Steps Part Ill : CAR Applications o Overview of Applications j mry Update ries ® Phase I Public Participation Program Data Gathering Community Visioning ® Phase 2 Draft EIS (necessity of EIS to be determined) Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements Draft Edits to Development Regulations ® Phase 3 Final Draft EIS (if needed) Final Draft Comprehensive Plan Elements Spokane' Final Edits to Development Regulations ley • Adoption Community of Opportunity Amend the Zoning Code and other development regulations as Review the vision needed to ensure for the consistency with development of the updated Data gathering community Comprehensive Plan Implement the Develop goals, Public Participation policies,and Program to ensure objectives continuous consistent with the participation vision valley. C.o,ann n;t'of Upportumn' We are here CommunityReport r Released April 14, 2015 _ Sö ‘0 \■•4„kane The full report can be Valle . 06 . VisION �►'�� � accessed at. "} http://www.spokanevalley.org/CP �� EN `rk", COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE • "_" a COMMUNITY VISION REPORT ' Y` Ls APRIL 2015 Spokanne�' Valley. Community of Opportunity Community i Re rt Purpose Summary of the milestones in the first phase Community Economic Explains how themes were developed and Character Opportunity adjusted based on input from the public. Contents Project overview Public participation objectives Housing Transportation Initial themes and finalized themes All meeting materials (in appendices) soodOwnment matrix with staff responses Community of Oppo,tunin' , n inion "A community of opportunity where individuals and families can grow and play and businesses will flourish and prosper." Source: Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan — 11\ri iir 0:!44,44.- .„. .,..E. .. .. 4 ___: _ . __. __ I I r1 Spokane�' .0.0va11ey. Community of Opportunity Part III CAR Application Review Overview of Review Process and Next Steps j mry CAR Applications A total of 26 applications were received 19 Map amendment requests 5 Text amendment requests 2 Overlay zone request (map and text amendment) Spokanems' �Va11ey Community of Opportunity i -___.------------------ 1----- , L ci.,...f ..---- .. ._, • __ ____--_____--7.-------- - -) ., .._ 1 .----.--N-„,.. \ --... I---, \ , ENE MEW MI . L- ) --.--77<•. - ...- -_ Ifidwad 1110 .I .--1-1 f- •'= -'... • ' — - --,. IM "• "' 4 I ..,-, ' 1 1 ,.., mmL i -,----- MI .._ /1-- _ _ ji nallin VI . 1- 1-11 1 111:11il..,..... _ ---P-• m nom- _ r.,_ ,..... . . _ - -___ _ -, , - _ / OIL 1- -I ... s \ ''-L- - . / willtfil• —1111112r -r-CAR 15-901,1 M. -- o m.c •i-,,—_ ---,7-.2-_---111. --'-----_i/V- FIE 161 IN • -' .. -. 1 . 10 15003 --*,..--- _,II . •—re 0 tel HER apir T.C.rei, ..11 =111111 == • CAR 154014-Obi ill - j" IIII. Edr - I IIMMIllr'm h.. , CA R 15-042E_ 1 LOR to C imal_111 DRato..ID,It Immillh, HDR to CNIU , . .71 , - .GAR 1541424 JO' Al II I 7- I- • '''.-:! _ r•--: %,...-.'ifilp -asim „......... • . .. . MDR to HDR III: ,-'" . --.- .i 119 ' I li i.,-: ._ ..__ .-,- . ".•,- _i_.. Ai km_ •_. - -\:..,..... -- ,. .. . _ ,.. i--- , • . - 1 m, 1 1 ' • ' . INEwr-A 1,1PMNIIIMIa"- --"r"-- - ,. . ) :_. -,,, "...-- -..'L Ili V - m irmmi N I AR 154110-0011 1M I wi-1E408_001, GA R 154104.007 .0 to C MU or NC ei . ''.... .)1 liNi - _-.,-,-I - - 1 .Nomi lacm to H DR =6m min to cm u...Ns 0 I I= 0 -=.- 1 _ 17._::4-17 ' lit - ._ _, ,,,,,411._•._ _ l ____Innamm ..L..= _ - - ------ : 4•11. 1.1121 4 ....... .• : , "1 . . .11. ,.. III nil 7.,t,"...... lie 4. .1_ kilLA:= It' ........ I.. - 'Ll-,. - ' 1, =0,„,....... r ivirz his=mas.r.„ ,weitimir wiligirfti gii I 114100 Alf 41. krillk m I Overlay Locations \1111711.p.MEEMMIW. 1*...'1.6.4\111"111kliklarrli diarilli ghfic, Legend SARA pp licatioil Desenption of 10 =MEIMMILii_me.s\II=11111.1MM.I =MMIEIrgt( 'ft Comprehensive PI.11 i Nuf1115&E RINI ALS.1 M ..,LIMilight."15===1111\ 110=1 _ 'CO CA1'11541418 L.8":1.1iel°DP.:19MtkahriCarti Chttla';- EMelillikilhibliMINIC14111611117rWliair II I -1Io 1.10101111.;1 11111111EF iliirdasal .- .•.‘.• . .-; De.elop Man beriotered la MIIINVE All ii. •' • . --r., CAR 154°25 Nome Park Over lay IN ii, I wiraitipvi q -- - iiiik Nrorpieft. fedi ME.• ' • . - ''''' Mc) I M . I MI= ....Ai CialltAld dig gilei MIL r.i-^E"WM q1.1) ,CN ' '-'i I 11" •1 Review Process •Review Planning •Review for •Review Staff Commission Staff criteria Planning Memo City Recommendation Review •Prepare Staff Commission •Forward a Council 'Make final Memo Recommendation decision on what to City Council is included in update scope *April — May 2015 *May 2015 *May —June 2015 Spokane Valley *Anticipated Dates Community of Opportunity Planning commission TENTATIVE Review Timeline Study Session - April 23, 2015 •ReviewStaff Planning 4 : Public Hearing and Deliberations e Forrd a Commission Recommendation to City Council May 14, 2015 and May 18, 2015 Findings - May 28, 2015 Spokane Walley® C.on njunity o)Opportunity Planning commission options Include in Comp Plan Update A •Review Staff Planning ForwaMem°rd a > Defer to Future U Col'YlmiSSIon Recommendation to City Council Do not Include in C � Plan Update A Sc�,�okane Valley C.on munrt}�o)Opportunzty If a CAR iincluded in the Update Process for analysis No Waiting for a does that mean it'srave ' ? analysis - Requests will be Amend the Zoning Code andother considered as part development regulations as needed to ensure of t h e Review the vision for consistency with the development of updated Data gathering the community Comprehensive Plan comprehensive land use analysis Implement the Public Develop goals, completed by Participation policies, and Program to ensure objectives consistent consultants. continuous with the vision participation Revisited at Draft Spokane Plan Review valley. Community of Oppo tumti' Stage. Part IV CAR Applications — Overview 19 Map amendment requests 5 Text amendment requests 2 Overlay zone request (map and text amendment) Spokanems' Valu„ of Opportunity Map Amendments Request Overview „.„... @APPLICANT: 10 15, ]Yv CD Edward Payne „.,,v 0 , . ,-_-_ .„ -,---„r_,,, -- -- ----, '-'" ,,,,, a@ADDRESS: -- _—~� '”'- ----,. .;1-7"- '-', --'''-- - 1 Ln 1618 N . Sargent Rd . ,-,---,_,,,,,,--„,,,, ,,,„,...„------,,,,, -----",,,,,,,,,„-------", gt—i -- '--'--------."./-:--, '-',,----, ._, -'__---,c---- .- -,,,„--4--0 0 - i o REQUEST: ���fst�y Ar.a % , cvN4 - -,----„- 0,0 ChangeCompPlan Map i0 .,0.„----- -_,,t1 designation from 0 to , U HDR and Rezone from . C13Y G O to MF-2 - Spokane e r - va11e:. CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION Community ofOpportunity a IIS fiE7%7 AFF t. WI t . 0 OP 4. --- 7 p • _ ,,i,e,,„.,,._,.;., ,,,,,,,,_•,.,;.,,,,,,,,,,..,- ,"..---,'X'- ,:,,,,.,,.,___,,, ,e, ,,.•'. .'''''....'-''''",F,'-'''' ''p ',_...• '-'''''''''_ -----'- Ir''''''c''''''''r- �r� * ' 0 • .....,., .7,,_..". Study Area I " W -'''' '', ....,.. T I• ,.....,,;?„, / ......._,,, „/'' F''F'';7I„r j .. e .7 1. + , I .,,,,,,,, Ln , .. .,.t.----- :.•;"<''-.''''' . -- .•'''''''''''''':),:1::..,_,F.;":'''->1-'4'.-F'-''''''-'''';''':.--,'''C''''..-<'''-'''''';''''.-.,--,0 i°'..''''''''''''''';'<-'''.:'! Ial L . ''2 '':, ''' '' ''''' ''" -''F''''''F'' ''--,F' - 'F,,,, ,'''''' -.• '', ., .,I '''_ ,I ''F°1-'' ''',:;.,,,_r'''''' C) 4111- .6i . I- _._ - rr , r.,,-,,------------ ..---..-'----?--- .._ .__..;._.,,, ,,....-.0 1 ..„<---:__ _, ._,„...,-,„,---7- ------ A--4,------ - . No - _ io NI . ipi il id ,... . .- l _ g - -_ ! fl. < , , , ._ 0 i r 1,:..__._,,,,. _ .._ i ,:„,r, ' ,, ..7_, Li _. ,, I .�"'okan �' Valley. EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community ofOpportunity proposalPhotos of -",--...-."L;'Ii-.'--.1'-.••e---.-j -,• '-,-.---e7i.0,',‘4.--ir---oN0.!-•-i-i_.'.i---.4-,0,,,-."r,4••),,,•&,.\11.r--.I<i=4!.f,41-1' ...-X.g,Po-0-.-4-r”-4'A,.I,.i'T'•:4;--„".•-f'4.11.7i,,i.-.-41:A-,N-,7..-.'.:'tA>-.-;/..M,.,1.7:.;•i_r.„„'o.,4.V,R,1,-tV,:'1,.47-.0o,,•:,,_x-,.'.-.7.:.'0:,,,°idi4-,,l_-44k.'.,-z47:.„l44;,e41,a1,-,,t40:i4,4i'0..,1,,:.,4k!”.'.-'-0,-'„4.44-.•17'0i",7,4,,..-*-.:,4•,i.,-,'"-.::-.1.d.0g_'-.s-71-f''l1,-.-4r4‘-7,4J.---14,','".--';i'„k•-'-r•,.4'-q•'4'4'-•',.t4i'',4.4P,.'''''„*_r-r ,4'-:2'.'.-fr11'40r'4'1-A-'4,,•i,:4:'4-..-'e',V,--..‘,:2--..'4:.:,.•,.t#”,,',•,,,i•;.44,,,-•,•,':/,„t,t4i.--..s..', •;'i',•,.,;.,-a'--,1,.,.:,.-:,,,;‘0,,:,.-.-4-.,'--;:1,-'4s'-.':,, ':7';,*Ui.';'-;r':,:'.-.,,-;-',.,t,;s:4k',—,i,.o-)..g..k'4$.-4,..-''f;.-.,„.1,':.,*2407.-',,.*,4•:;,.,..'c4.';'lr!',4 .',,=:4--..4„-e..:'.;4,'p1'';:',.-•$'z-:-1fr'"e',.',e'-.:,:.:_•'-tA:7'-7 •.-,-.•,'i1,.-t!-•.,..,•.•k•4;,v'.. .r•.-,,..-.:t-•-,-;-.:,;- 40 • , Ak, * . it • t .- i - . :_ A ' -',-4447.;v;-,::.',,,-:1o:41--k.•-1•11*.--..• -Ilitr t .. _-- -t•' 44:• _ , - ,.. • -.1'1 ' • - 1..-1--„- -,-•-4, L— , -'.': -1,-ev_'T,•;''''v- - ' -, ,r 1 ..,,.,,,,,,,.,.... .-,,f; 4..- ,i ,i,„4„'.,,r,,,t.=.,•,,,,,t,,..,,o. . ,- .,,,,.1:.:_,...„. ....,. -- ' ":-..', .. - : ..: .„ . ,.. _ ,.._ IT • 10 ... -7;;.4. ,%, -44, •, • 4 4 4 . 4 4‹.' .- • • J. • .44 4'4 • ' 4'.• . • • I 4' '' 4.4• 4. - , 4., ., . .. ._ _ . — — 411111.1 ,- -7411111Nmapo.. - -.4.3111111.41110,..34006- ..... ... . OSe\or r . Looking _ ,....... ...... CIT r kane East Valley' _ _...... Community of Opportunity Surrounding pes 0. q ,:w , a '!, J w' x R • • „VI. Nit ti i."‘et' • .nk., • 71 South North { P f -'- r i V. 'fir+"' - Spal�an�ems' valley'41111.1° Community of Opportunity East, i J o APPLICANT: , \- Co Howard Herman 0 o ADDRESS: ,nr—�, 1 115 and 117 N . II� McDonald Rd . Cs) o REQUEST: ,,,„„...N,N,,,_-. 1-N,,\,.7 ,, .,,,,: _ � Change Comp Plan Map ,,'NN %-.,,'N ... , z*-, ,,,,. Q designation from LDR .. � � -,.....,_ \ V to CMU and Rezone � � X----,,,,\......---. ..._- ,,es,..from R-3 to CMU j„n�l�m� CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION -,- o' mimi' - ' : (- F" Iii Ji, Si,.;:--'..- 1:::"..j,:::::::.,::-jti:-.! '.." \._ CD ill 11.I MI 14111! 0 r Study Area � MI , .�� a ,7:,,..7, :.._,,,..„,.,,,..,,E!„,„,,; v - - ti. .- _ - -- � - - � F it f CD --\\ I o 1 ,, I P, 1 ... a " LJ- I J f � CD it -- .r .. �� _I 'NN ,NN,s,..,,,‘ --- ...„..._N, N- ,:-,,N ,N.,,,,,.....„,.....,. ...Nn , ......, ,„,.„ , . 4 -.....--.....- k-''''''''''' :NN."``N--••,,N N-,.. -'s-k-N s-- • < in , - 1111 '.--N N"-N„ .,--,--...,'N\,-,s ',...,,. .N-,'—'--.'''. ,,,,,,,...: ''''---,,.. ',=s N. ,,, .._,N'.'''N ' ',N,,,-..,.:"N,,,_"'-1 U . IN All ^ . .. „ y A. - S I -' " _ -. `` - - `` `.�' C1Wai ' ley EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community of Opportunity Photos of 13 ro 13 os.m....mm—mm....1:.. • , . ,.. . .. . . ..... 44,,.. , , , , , , livir- . , ,,iiii, _,:. . . , „„,....... , . .,. 4, .4 ys �y L4C711:41:1.11. ini....1 imommi _..-- Looking North - �=-'� _- -�_- . . Att liN - . - fir grit - _- 1111 4111 - 1 Ill iii ' _ ' r 440 • Y. 1 ,, Spokane 1 dossa.val ey Looking SW Community of Opportunity Surrounding p y:.L r 1 West y South • Fi. 1. , ,,; *X P Oil"\arrft Spokane Walley. Community of Opportunity North e 1111H,e@APPLICANT: CD 0Triple Creek Investments � 1111 1 al ® ADDRESS: � 16608 E . Broadway Ave. I@ REQUEST: --- Csstudy Area NI 1 Change Comp Plan Map CC designation from LDR to , ' HDR and Rezone from R- 4_ U1 3 to MF-2 4I _ C13Y9F .."...., _ I I kane vCommunity of Opp1e�. ortunity CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION r,K, Illg - -1MM. ------'-------------------1 0 ., , . 61141 7 ' , .. A `1 66 a , _ .., „ .� . _ , , 1 nn C) L. .,,'K met ' I . j t° I lion , AL. , e I 11 Study Area 0 Fes. 0 NH "' 4 L . . ., 4. , , t__. , i _ , . , ,, _, u, 1 --..-- < 1 , __1 ,... — a i , _ _ U 1 ,. 1 ck Spokne' .o..Va11ey. EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community of Oppo tumti• Photos of ,or..-----a711 w .. . . . .. • ... .: --- - , . _ _,,,_.,.r,,. , ,..,............. _____ _____ _____ ...._ Looking South __ -- .- ......� - tin rr .z. .�. .- _ .� ',. ro rte.,`__lr•"-- - ...--- Spokane Valley. Lo Valley. North et southern line Community of Opportunity Surrounding Properties ..r. ,,,.,, • • J lir - • ,r• . - ,41 ... -r• 440 )1114 . - • - .._ T ... _ • , .. .., . ,...„ . , _. , ....... .1,0.. .,.. .,. ,.. , ....1, I '?44 ' l• . , , , ..• ._,.. ,.. m st-„‘" 4 - ,----i-s=*,, .% himm .-T1,--w - at= MN INK 1 - jaa 4111: -7 4.1:Z'S- • . I I V. , .16, 1 I 4--- __ 4 -'. - __ -- ...'44144•-'-'"'-- I S' . . _ . ---------- ' . North East t . %... .- ,i, _••••• _ _ ,... .1... Ast ,... ...41111111.0111111.• A - a- .. rialf . - augarilkl. ' ... ......mm.- -. ...71111.... 011/ orft Spokane - 410001*Valler Community of Opportunity Southeast Cs o APPLICANT: C, Stephen For 11 ® ADDRESS: 4:a3T.77T0 Rcr 15ave , ›iL 0 226 and 302 S. Sullivan and 4„�, ,,� Co adj . vacant lot; 15411 and ,14:-9,- 0 L ? 0 15423 E. 4th; and 15410 E. , - .;- ,. .":,4 is) 2nd � � 4533T„.I � � - j = �E : , _itfAr- , r—Io REQUEST: 0 . • '- ' ,,-.,.-,j N Change Comp Plan Map ___, % -- , -- ---- ->_,d1- cL designation from 0 or MDR 451523471 e,.1358 23 c. � 4TH 75423 r; to CMU or NC and Rezone �� �� from O or MF-1 to CMU or S okane �. NC � va1teri. CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION Community of Opportunity 0 , ,.., , . . II 1 r :' , i _ ,t ''-'''-'-''-.:.....--,' ,--'''''.. ''''''-'----:_..........•.-'"-- . CI 1 1111 I • 1 A 3�! ' 5226 S- Q' � 4.51235411611E100—'''SULJJV NW m - =rig ,. 2ND AVE �5237 7i d p l 2$ k2�> CO SULLrV.AN r2 n' _ _-.. - �11�LLI.V�AN:f� r�r., _ ',rStudy -!/� '�/!! StudyArea Area M.n 523Y'Y362 �� MI= imn �'a n - ..1" 5237 7358 ` 4523Y,7358 y� f1 °� 75471 E 452313 C ii0i T 4TFrAVE � "'I i Fourth Ave 0 II3C '... '10 17— I < 1 1 rir _, ,,.., . 1 . - 4 1 i . - Spo? lleyne ` EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community ofOpportunitiy Photos of proposal -1.4 . ,. • . . 7 _—. . I -,.` •• I *OW U 11 ! WM . ! 1 -- —"wt. ___,:ori-7..-1--_4........._ _ z_____, - -- • -- 'Ilriall 1-1,.. _ - L Looking NW ,.. ..,_....„ ,k . . „._. • . . • •, ,,-,.. ,L. •L'LL • L ,. :44 40' i' •,• . — • ..,.••. air .4•,...7T. :.,.." ..— --failk ' ' ,• ---.-:.6.„ .411) . .... ill K. La ; w.;14.1111r -......- I- I— .- ' -I I J _ . ( V ; $ 01"1\11N/lk —--........ "--1 - Siolane . .,...__ - __ . Lookin • SW- Community of Opportunity Surrounding pop. ,_ . . _ _ , . __ _ . _._„_ - , 1,, ` • - .,, Ks • gl ii II * — iil ek i i 3 Southwest lop- -_ _- East- s. CE h 1. 0 . "•' ' e' 9 ip Trig+ ____Lm jimpaium_,,_,...r 4_2_-_M_.,• .i. .l''';lari=-_,i.-,,,r,."_,__ _ ._._,,_ .,..4: C„oka0 ems' Walley Community of Opportunity Southeast %-i %-i APPLICANTz‘,.',-- % . ---- \�.\ 0 - - a :i."i:1::.'1:: - .- -,, --- -. .- --':.--- ,- --. `:-- - -''N:-%= '-.; !::::,'.:::':....':.'i 0 Dennis Cra o `�- �- � . �� - :.;,::::.:;: 6 . ..„ :. -,:,,, . o ADDRESS. N----N----N---- ---`•-•---------- --•'-------,,N,_.„,,,, . . . __-.,.��__._ ______ .�___. �.__._.-._�____- �._ It-I •,'', .,-,N,.7-NN.,_m-.z.:-. ,:..k.zzz-.:.-7 4.---x--,..,..---. ---,,,,,z-1‘..--.--%..,--,:r_,z-,:.-,..-,.‘-. .....-„,-,_ s r 13215 and 13313 E . 4thIIIIII Ave. ' 1 ,„ _ Study Area '� REQUEST: -- - - %-i 0 Change Comp Plan Maplin 1 CSI designation from MDR to oc 1 F HDR and Rezone from MF-1 to MF-2 *Wane valley. Community of Opportunity CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION 7111 itel ...--- . 'r ,,,,,, ,, ,,, „N,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,k,,,,,IN,,,,,,,,\,,N,,N,,W,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.. ,,... Co wir: , , , i li. . H ' - '• ril - 1 §..... ... ,,, NN's-%, "`N, ''-,,,s,,,,,C--,,, ,, .!;i:.;: 0i I Ik - N_'l ` s.. .W...rhll\.."...1%. ...- -"..%1. ..��1 tl 4 di 0 111 111 0 iIII ' " _. — Study Area] oq" - , 1 1. I n '� _ 1" '' ' E — 0 _I ILE \_ 1 1 1 .._ _ ,. fiNi , . ii . _ 1,.. 1 ..„4 . . i. I i ' ' -.1 CC "I U = ' 11 i i ' < *- i , i SIE /MI III , 1 liml I I I I 1r Spokane Walley` EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community ofOpportunitiv Photos ofproposal ilorge,iiiii.. -,,i. ....' ....,., How�.509.u... �9$ _ ,. , . . __. . . .. . ___ ____ • _. ! \ _______ _,____ r. ______ ______________ __ ______________ _ _T________ . _ ______ ______ „J., . _____ _. ___ MI 1 ,� =116 maimaill Mini a� r MIME_1.1..RIM III kF ' j J r Fi ' tsi ` _,,,,41,, spokav cora �� le e Looking Community of Opportunity Surrounding p _ ... _ -----:>- --- ,........, . A.. . ..is,. - Z.. 54 --+ . --#9111111117,,,4ii lriatiorie-'....!.4., j i @$ it .q ' -".`F 1— y�0�, i n s ,.. 4 _ Jas, 430 4/44 AMP b ., ,. I y i , - F `� fit..„ r. South . . Northwest i � , +gyp , .o , -,,r r i4 . 4 n *I, 1JIII Magi Spokane Walley. Community of Opportunity e. - N APPLICANT: pi 0 1 %—i O' Reilly Enterprises p oADDRESS: Li) Vacant Lot - N-s' .,,-,,N,\'-, •�Yw ,,,, „,N‘N.N,.N-N 1 0 oREQUEST: ,..,\_,, '''--- ' z.,:_NN.-' ,,..,,..'N,'~',.:NN''''NN„, N..7 -,•,N ,,,'' '',,,-.,'N', -,,'-,'NN:.'' sN k N Change Comp Plan Map .„ N-NNN--‘,1 Qdesignation from HDR :‘ ---NN,NN– ----6- k- -N‘- -'''- li Li) to CMU and Rezone I ro m .,) MF-2 to CMU 'N' - „k ,,,,,L .L-- k-- � % . � '. ....k,„_, j�109, ,,,, CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION - 11111 Cs' Study Area mim1 Study Area= u14) ' 1;;,r11ey. EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Opportunity Photos of pr , .Nt. 1, t ----/"... -"•''': ,,,,, 'p7-:-,77-.'-;-'''',1;'..i, . ' :'.----.:c.. A f �.i ! • 7 n� • 4,... ...1:,.'f.,,,.'fi114.4.40,-.%N. t is a y,: '�' x . # 1 „,),-1:”. ',,,%-4.01,14£'', .;..,,.,, ,,,-,- 7:„..... ,.: .,..,„,,,....,..„.4,,,,..,„...,,„:„ .: n �� j F ,(t r a Ap �'' r 'e+P '."'R.� 2Sgwa'4. L `yg� 4 !y + • tA '74 0� -:341,;1.-- •. 3 ot!ir i.. 'fit 5 y . 9 m.. 3 - 7 - . tyt *1 „... ..„..;.„....:,_ L1I Tx• i �', , h ` ,yi , wA„,,,,,. '-'4--1444z- j1, � k ”r'.LA ..„4.-,,,, w. 0-;',- ii. h@ ..r:c•:pt . ,i ''.W..,- *i ' +°:. .ra# Air `� ;, yra"i '''''4,1"1'.:1''''!4'11 ^ lA'!¢1' r., t 1" "lllli 4'' . i i,,,c,.._ _' ? y �, ,,.r �_ .- .i-. wag F Spokane6k-1:1-P-kL,11 . ' '.-.' - . LLt1iiiçj ' Community of Opportunity Surrounding properties .:. .o. , -A .,..„ #t L,._.&+.i,,. .' .,-; .f-,',..''''"‘i,1;.: • , .. • - 1.77'.---', "").1;'!.-''.4...'...N. i. N,.. ,-L.,:r,..,'--- -:,-- •k; . :,/ .,,-.1 - ' .' '±..1),!:-. 4 ''':,:''':',' ,141.--' ,..- . - ' •-'1,:. . . ..... imor imillimiraiZillirilliir , - . V ,„..ir .. '-•:-t,illkrik.:,, •••.;;•,',,,,.•:'•.,„ •,,...:,..3'....t,..,.•,,,•:•:'.-„, vitrx , • - :. t i',4— • , .• r 1.44,.„.„ . , ....,. •— I ' MP . ... ... •• • .. .. ...,. . . _ k , , . ,.........., .,4,...„....,,,,',:.,.-,i.. , , ,,, .4•,.A -, ,''' t.',4, ,• ' ' . 'If-1-,' '''Ai'- 's'•.','",; , • . lillV,..-t-to.,/,[1.,,,,- :-....-44,•7 • i*-_'•^,-' ---r...'' '' ..,.. ..i...--' ,..,.._X-it,-„.;---'"4",.' '—0 vAll Whicr-- ' • . '. ' ;-- :.' ' -,,. '-,..-;441iiirsirril. . -•,- ,. , _ .... , . -. ' 1'.----;-: _:.:j'elik '.1-,-.'i.., ...• i. .:. ,k,. _„.:.,,k,- .., ,..k , , .„ . .... 11111011"11"111"1". :7111r:. ' IL„11 IIII '41'li - . - • —-imit witiiiV,i , . v.. , 1 • ) .4' "Ic:'4...7::'''''''''r.- '''•;r.' ID ,I . North. 1- ' .0,.'$:,.. • . , , kk, -,' f' ,', v.,-,..•'.., .1,1 ,. ;,,s,,.'' ',1., • . ' '''. Ai"4','0 .'.' - - ' 1.=.1- -',''''''''....14;•,;'' ,, Vfrfo ,,i A 0..,(,, ,.,...',0;,;,?. L.,iii -4 ..;,4-:,.:-..44i4.4 , 44 ,.4.; , L ,,g, -4 L4L.:,, - .4 L, .,, p f ,,, ' ,•gM ..),A , _ ' r'L'' '..}., •,'' '', .. •'''''.L ,4*.1 ,) L-.L7 ..;';'. :;'.- ',,.4..' ir'''‘''''.'-',t, ..,..r ,,,,i..z.0%,/ ',',.,_' *-5 T. .. ..,0... .,..„•',' ....:1• .:.,.' ,'1,.,.:1.::',,,.1,, A-r,Pjlipl';'?;,,.::'•:';.,,...- .,,...*.k'''::„''''"':,''':., * 1 --,e' ilr ''..et,-v.,:•"10,, 'i,... ' ''';';'–' igoitV,er.4:4',;V-...-;*;1:';':'. e W'''''' ;'''':'• . •' • ''''''',''•:'''''. • : ' ..,"2.13, r"_. ., . . ..:-;-.„?.•0,. , s 1' ' * AD.:. -- ., . ..,..4 . • ' , , 1, ' ''.. . . . S.,... OSe\MIN IQ.-,A D li. ane "A. 1,-, Valley' •• •. _._,..,... ,..._,.... . . . Community of Opportunity East : M APPLICANT: ---,, ,---,-- -,-,-_.,-,,,,--,.----_ -- %—i Jerry and Angela Bishop ;"..,-_, '. ;- p oADDRESS: „„„, LA 8021 E . Broadway Ave . "'" ---.F- . 0 oREQUEST: ,,,- -,,,, ,_,,,, ,,,- -- ” ,>?-,, ,,.„:" r'sli Change CompPlan Map ,- -- .--- ,-- A Qdesignation from 0 to V HDR and Rezone from -oes,OtoMF-2 1 Sliokanej�107,,.,, CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION yw r 0 . 2 .'P,,, -'- '',::', ,,, '-, ,, ''--- Study Area I. � � � Study Area 0 - I � -' �I� k,.�4� % IIJI Li) . , - - - '-'- ,,,--,,,4 CD ------ ' - <--A - _ - ' B, ... CLI *4 mt sei '- " < - ' .7 • 41 ' .' 0 110 ir 1 - r *Wan... .15: Va11ey. EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community ofOpportuniti� Photos 0 f 13 fi .7 ,..717);„'...,-. ..,:,...,-,. .--.+1.-. jitirOleK y, te' r , 3 r� " I � ' -° YYYl Il learil 111!'Y'.; k -_ tie p W No,,, 5 • e. Y -4 * 3 . =, .C.....n,.1! w, . . N. ,,,,,- . i, .4'4 -"-f...,'"----"'-747-' . ."- • • -. --t . • 4:i.---,-<:-?.-:::;.!,''.. fir y; f, _; h II-A--- ter.^- J C. 9F . ._ NW pokane ,� _ Valley Community of Opportunity Surrounding propertiesI . ... . ... .. ...„.... .,„.... ,, ,,,---7.,....g,, . r ..„--. . ,. , l'i4c;::. .1'.' ...„. , .. .. - . , . . 41,' .", •-1" , ::-.-- r*. „,,•!.. . ,,,, .'• .- ',, .. • , ._••14,,,,, , " ',-.'f.,; ,.. - i_.;,, 2`•",7..-.• .. . • - .:.1 . , .. .i• . ., . •J .4*..4 JO •'-'•.4" :. C. ' '. 1r4 • ..,. ' ..I..Zr .4.-' '''.•-.'''':'. -'''' .I.•''...401k - 1.k.'.1. ' . .%:',:••',i0.:‘...-1:' ''''1' ' • , ,...t%e, ' .%1.43i. .6•44'' L. " •It . .-„Amos . Al 4711-‘'.lfr"; '' '''' ., ?'7..'' . • . . .!' ''..f.",— 17 ,,.. a. •1$'AHEAD ' • ,,,. , 1 I E:-•.4-,•••,.-drit4V,' li WWI— ' -1-1 . . •— - . ' . —• • , . .. •11 '' '------------ . N ..... . ..,.... ,.,..... . 414.44; LLiik, • , i • , 1 ,• -. .... ' • F1 :mr:.77:,e, t--• --7', , ,j k,..11P c ,. . eir-- -r- - .r r . - , West ______ _ .__ __- Northeast _ _.. _.. __._._-------- .__ . ....... ..,. ., „..... ..,... .., . . . „. . . ,...,. .. . ... .-.. .:. .. lAli -..--. 41•0 ...-- . ( , ... -- ..--• .,=10ra.i.w......-- • , _ ,,_ i _ -.:- d 4000 Val leY. ' . 1111 Community of Opportunity SW A --m � APPLICANT: Il . - .-, ', ,--',_ -",-,: . . - . - - o Brian Chavez dD avid - � and Geraldine King %-1 o ADDRESS: . . . : . . . p 15316 and 15324 E. ' Valleyway Ave. bli Stu tlyArea � o REQUEST: ,q� � • CD Change Comp Plan Map N designation from LDR to /0 ' QC and Rezone from R-4 to li .•/\., miiiimmimi.... _..,. _ ,:.:....__ ___ „......___. ....,.... .... ...._. .. . . ..„._....,....„...,_..._ ...,. ....,.._ i Sfiokane j„n�Opportunity CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION ursMII. 111‘ a 1 ! a Ri :_ , F, - I. Study Area Study Area' Jr ,-1 'I - s& - _ . ... : .,0 g r r au rilli .., I � ;gyp • Spokne�' valley' EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Con naunity of Opportunity j"Illijlirt -:— .--„,4 •y . ,,4,,,,4 r‘::.f.t,4, ,,... _ . , . , • .' • "•AIMIIIIM Photos of proposal - ' , ,... AI 1 ' •,i'w-„. , . - 0 pf , '.. t0„.•..i.* .- . -- - ./. ,--- :7— ,.;_ —rm.°. .t.. -.7/ .-----, 6 - _: - -- — .- , . - •oit: , - s — _ - . . ; _ k. . , 1611 , - • . , ,... ._. _ - . _ Looking North . ....., .... ,.. . ...„., ... *6.-.-4,,,, 'I if . , - .,, -0" ilF• .1. , ,..:‘,.v,.., -1),..-. 4 - ...' . -. he': --;: :. ......A. iv it , velp • it Y.,. i 14 i_ - . _ . .... -4... _. ..... Spcmokane _ ....Valley. Looking West : .._ Community of Opportunity Surrounding properties _.,....,,„,_., „..,..„,„ _ _ • Acri. • ,- .,:. -1,----11 ,, . •- • .... , . -4,.:•'. =EEM Ii , ,,. . .-Y:?:''.:.-•''.1:.r' ' 4'.:''' '-'=. . -.-,1- 4.q. -''',!. I - ' ._.4 ;-,;,Ii - ' . ,..,. ,i—.., IMHLIUfill _ -_ 7- IIlluJHhIllhI11III T..ji •1 fg, j*. 1.,,,, ; ..' 1.II _ 10 ''.!. ' . ' -. - 1 WI 1 . . . . - North . _..._ East , ... .. , . . . . ,.. _..... .. . . . ...1,_ s. Ja, y it , _ . '------ I • • ....,,,,) -,,..- 5- - ; 1 a .it1 ., •. , •I Iv••,r,,,: I , I i : 7 4, _ i I .. _. - ..1- ..ft.. O."\alVft SCOO"kane 401001.Val leY. .'.' Community of Opportunity South ® APPLICANT: 1 =~ {M •� Verona Southern '1''' , . ,, . i 071 ® ADDRESS: N � � 0.bu ila 0 "Study Area Southern Manufactured � , , imi* ' Home Park ( intersection ; ; y ; E Lina I w f 'a vALLE'nxar of Barker and Laberry) w .E 1870 E vALLE.,.0T m d¢III• $ ,'1 • a � F II �0 o REQU EST: w yxsewn :4ia G F I res4 Change Comp Plan Map i - Ja ¢ I,. designation from MDR to HDR and Rezone from U MF-1 to MF-2 1 In C13Y F �� Spokane F MJoey:nit, CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION Communi L' — . 41111 . _No...... .......:1ZAN.Nt,N. -.N:.' 'W. 10 WI !: X4!1' i ----- .... - r iiii,, ;,' . ,. , .c.,,':,....,,z,,,-, .,..--N..N -7...,,, ,,,, (7 mow, it-i . .. ....: . .I ,' N........., ........ a . - i AreaStudy Area 1 Q 1NN,,,,....`%,..'N'NN.NNIStudy f–— lid . :,_. 1 . _ .,,,,< , tl gW'Y� ;.y� �� III �¢ $ I W :t 't :,, yA . Lin r.„---- ;j;t.i 01 y e. . VSUt YNAYC =J.i y liw e' r� 1/7 0 .t: 11'-`/ / 'e PY v u w yr gra.. c,„ . - RI _ 'mQ¢ ' � .- Er 1 ii If C U < .I I. ' Fli. 4 . , IL II) - INW 4101111 dim r Spokane .Valley. EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community ofOpportunitiy -"I''''''''''INIIIIIIIIIU Photos of • ro • c l • ! - - _ '.e -__.-.1— fid Y Lip. ' , 11=11M Illr -- . _ . : 7....:,, , .,:,. ,' :::: a L €� i. fir ;} f, ? • _ • 1. '-, ,, , ._"'C ,tet i f� Ma,v _.. _ `Y � 9 -- w _______sms'ig ■ - Community ofOppoi4unity .- Surrounding properties . .,, I IN ,... re 1 1 -------. -- _,----' - • __-- - . • — , - V.I.___.,.-77•71k.,-.--- At !' , .ir,;.• li . 1 ::, .m. ,4, 3fr. .# . ,.•..„.., . . „ .,...... L .. . .... . .. . • - ...,....4 .., . . . we.IL.4,,- --- ' . magi : kr° 7,—, .. ..--__±. -.,;- •• 1 b ,- , k4 ) ..ge_.... -_- -.0--T. •:-.: ---,-..... _"--' •.:-. -.. „,..„...._ _..1,-....... _ _4_ , .... .... _ 4 , _ E .1E" 11P. f- .''''', ..'--. la-- -L4'- --ir:r -- .i - - :.:. ' ' Z A-4 ;:ii• , . ---.. ...„. • i 1 • - ••••4,-•••-•,17. ' 1 , • *•-," ....17-71.V. . __ - 1, • ______w___. .•, , _ _ • i • --- --- --- • `Ifi . - 1r •-• 4^.'II - -: ii,". -1,--._ __.. ...-.)iiii I- liiitool:, , . 4„..:,..,..... ,..-„. _ _. ..ietkosikakk — -,'- • -. • 1 - f ? ...___ c ic,. ... liza L : ;. file:-..: ,i,•T''''''. ' 410101111 valley r7t%::,-.4i. '. — C011inffirt211)'glOppoilurnty . . _ . N. APPLICANT: K--- --A 'c- '-"- '' '-,, - '---'-.,_. r,, ._ . --'v- -- --., %—i McFreeze Corporation 0 ® ADDRESS: -,„--,2-',,,,,,,#---,..--,--------,----'..,,, --__„,,,,..-.. ., , 5,,,,,,,,- - LA 807 N . Argonne Ave . ,---,-,,,,,, ,,,-----,---,--,„.----,,----_,.--- ..,,r,,„,, --•-- 0 oREQUEST: -,_,-------.---------_---- -.,,-------- ,,,,.,-.,--,-_:,- ,,F- -- -.. ----,,,,A-_,----,------_, --- -- N Change Comp Plan Map ---,, -,:,<,,-F,/, _,,,, ,,- -,_ ---._,7 .--,:,- ,,,- -,- , QI designation from 0 to '' '--..,-- ---: ' Z.3 NC and Rezone from ----------_,----.„----,,-----_ __,,----_,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,.,-----.,, ,,_,,,.. ,-----___„,,,,,,,„-----,,,,, ,,,.,,,.-----,,,,,_ „,-----,,,_,,,,,_ ,:,, GO to NC ------....--------------...--------,,, - ----- -;,,,--,. -. S}iuk ce ,- - .- -,.-- ",--.-_- ,---,,,,- -_,-..,„--. .,„ ___ j�109:,,,, CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION -:-.--,--,,-,,,,,,----‹.------K-0 ,,,,,,,„,- ,,,,,,,.,.,,,_,,,,,,F __..,_,.., 0------ _.,,:.,,e---7--,,,A ,--..:---,-____fr.-->,- '',- . I I k m t ''- . '' +r 1 _,,I-- .11 I I ; ' ' 1 ..-* ,, : ' y� 7>i -----0-.-,._„-,, -.,:•--i..,,.,,,,.,,,,,ri,,,,..,,---#..----.,,,,5: -,,,,,i:-.,.._____,A N - 4 , , - 1. vr. Pr - 4 p 0r - Area I. Study -.----)r-''--/4 -:'''',,,F*'''''''''''', ...r-.,..-",:,.,.,.., :'--•'''',,,- ;;.. - . 7..,,,,,,..7.., ,,. ,St- , _ ,::,,,,,,o,.,_,,„.,,.._.,...,,,_7,...,,...,..,..,„..,.,,„.,,,,.„0..,e,.,,.F''''''....,..,'"'''''''''''''''''''---•"'''''''--.•'''..-------''''.--•.--'.--,e-.',.'-e17:-..5,;,,._.,,,.,..........„,,.,.,_,...,,,,,r-'-'- -'''''''''''-''';'-'''''''-•_.,'i-'''--'-'-_.-''''. -,-,',--.'--,''',,''''''''',•,'"I..,,,,-'''.---F-F--oe.,_,,,---.,..,-,'d--,,'-''°-''--'/F''''-T,,,- --:>-.;'r:,''''''''''',,-. • -•'- '''... .-.udy Area e ..,,,,,,,,:,.,,...:,,i_,„-,:,,,:,,,•-',•'''-_,,,. .' "-.„,,,,,,,_,,,,.,,,i.",,.,,A.I ,:::----:_ .,, , ,,,,,,,__,,...,__________ __,_,..„,,,„.,,_,,,,,,-,,,,,,,,,..„„„,,,,„,_____„____ ______„,,_,,,,,,,_,,,_____________-------------,---,. ` ` _ . .0 7 , - 0 -iii . " . 4° ,--,. .,,,...„..:;7„:1.,,,,,,,,,,,,'--.,,,,,"`',,,,,„--- ,..,,,,,e>re .........„0„, Ln . 1.' R is _ . . _ ,---------A,-------- ----------------'ci - ,-1 — ''''' ':....,..,,,,'''''''..'''''''':,:pr'- ' 0 1 .'' ------ ' —--- - ' ' 1'' il 11 I. 7 ':''-'''S'''' '',, 4'''''''.'',. ''''P''''-, A' 1 1:L.,..... . , ' e '. :'''''''''..1:'''''''''''''..,. ''''"''''';''''-'''' 'e'''< < V' .i .4.4 ' ' MMIT 0 L.- - - . --' . , , , _ _ -_ _ pokan ' Valunley unEXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Commity ofOpportii� t i—Enomilniiiillui Photos of row l , tt., ..?,(.,..„:,. .,,,,%, , , , ..: ,?:"Iii;A.. . - rJ Yrs - vr. a — ter'. N ' j — ri Looking West -.._..,,.; _ .. .... ir , ... . , . . . . L . . ,.. .„ , ,.___ . ._ :, g,,..,... ... ._ .. ,.4, „,..„. .... ,,,.„, g. , , ��„okan�ems' . ,„ - Valley. Lookin • NE Community of Opportunity Surrounding p . _ . , t.,: J •t..,...,,,, .,. ,,..t,.:;,,. Tyr,.:,,!ri. :,:, _...._.......,,,,r 1 i . ,,.10, ,..„, 4f: . , .___ __ ., .0. 4'a - — — fir_ • x k II. , >; - '1:11-1—..- " a.- ° .2„+. . COIF4 ILE �, '�.] moi' .„.. f._ n —� "�! 4 s tee - - _ East • SPEED ' .1 SMIT ,135 W - PI 1 I r 1.110 cm o f - Spokan�ems -_ _ �Va11ey Community of Opportunity e s t AP P L I CANT: f. ,90,...,J %—i Reginald Martin -- 1 ,.::, p oADDRESS: LA 13520 E . Nora Ave . :ff-7,-;,--,-;,-- _,___,,,:--- - „______,___„ --,------,_,=----,._.,,.,-,--'''._ -_,-,,--._,--,---, -.,---__ __._,,,, ":.------ ---,,,,---,,,,_,,,_ --, -,,,,,,,-'-' °>----------.,----- , - 0 oREQUEST: , ->'-'---' .'e--7',,,,,,,,-----------,,----,----'-',--2-'---- --_,-----,--_- ---- -----'---- -_,---------- „.„_A N Change Comp Plan Map , ,,, -e_ _ ,;,,,,,'''F---- .>"---' --.-2'- - --- --_ ,,, ,,,,,,,,, ,01 � designation from O to C ''''A::-:---> 4 .<,,,, '_,- Vand RezonefromOt o C lim ',--,, --- lilitil Spcmo i'lle\'` j�'09::.,, CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION NIB o ,i,,., 1'?,, ,,, ,,,,. ,, _ , ;' '''',''''. LA .. MI _ .. _� am,, j _ , wir 1 . <,+).,,, ''' ', ,;_A -,''''' '''j'' ''''- ' -'r ' < 7;,A .',' %. " • 4 'C"-Cr?'' ' 'F",.- : -' -'., ."c, -,0 0 i ' I.:;AMP111110 fililt4Ahri),0 i - I ,f' ,, . ._ 2''1 ,. 1.,,N ,; 2,, -- --';,,, , ' --' 'e .-'-;.-. -- ,4;101 I- 1 '%'' '',,, .',,, _!-'7 , --- ' --. --''''I / cLI Q � j��¢y,Y EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING @ APPLICANT: k study A Co Dwight HumeN,..„N„. rea N N N ....,' N,N..N.N ..,_,....-.,,..---_,--..-,,,,%,,,.,,,-....,.,,N,' %-~---. @ADDRESS:0 ; :N, ` 0 12717, 12725, 12803, ' 12815, 12823 and 12903 4th Ave. ,, e w� 0 ® REQUEST: H ry= '= =_ H 1 -,1 ChangeCNI CompPlan L Map cc designation from MDR to HDR and Rezone from U MF-1 to MF-2 va11e�. CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION Community of Opportunity .....1..i.mm...1.1milm.11.1.1..1.71l\,, . ,11 : 7 ., . .,:,,, .7.._,,,j.,1,, r .7 'iii l.J; NN s ,,_N,,,NN,., StudArea _ ° .' ''' — Ly Stud y Area N.,......„,,,,s,..,.... —N., , ,, .›..S, CN -:-,---r--!-_,_---- '- '. - ' _, ,_ N ,'N,N , "'*'N. .N- ,N CD .IN . 0 -. 1 1 ii II Il ii ifill , I:— . p 0 . 111 i w1. , w I `-w , I Ce L ..„„ ,i. 41 S II �� ` P , ' urs! U , I " ' • mailiPmiL '' ''1 I1 Spokane .Valley. EXISTING LAND USE CURRENT ZONING Community ofOpportuniti� Photosoaf ro o l .11111.11.11. "� _4 Y. _ . _ ,.. :..._ ., . • .. • . , . :: _. ,,...,,,, ,,, ,.., . . , .. ,..: , . :....,, .. .. . , „ . . ..,,„........„_,:.,=._.....ilick i i , . . . r' _ 1164 • . s n _........... " ,',7,...":-V .. ';•,' ';i'":',;.?..:•'., ,A % .."is d a • - ' '-7,7VIViaf ii,:;,.116,,,i'..73 7:,' Looking NE n s, 3; Spol�an�e�' Valley. Looking East Conanaunrty of Opportunity Surroundsng properties R , 14. h 4iR A ,/w. ?, ,y h • t. • East { �. ; North Fri ,,F _. ti- ,;:t- 1 , * Spakane - - . Valley Community of Opportunity Text Amendments Overview Spokane mmunitVa1y of Opportu 1ey Conity PROPOSED TEXT AMENDME o APPLICANT: 19.60.020 GO, Garden Office District (IN Dwight Hume 19.60.020.6.2. Dwelling unit 0 ® ADDRESS: Citywide in a building orstructurewith nonresidents l-on CD ® REQUEST: entire ground floor. Parking for residents must be reserved and clearly marked, except housing Modify Garden Office to allow provided as part of an institutional "continuum of CD care" concept to encourage independent living. MF-1 density Multi-family units subject to the development I residential uses standards of 19.40.070(6)(1) CC and Office Zone to allow MF-2 19.60.030Office O ce Di ri st ct density residential 19.60.030(6)(1) Multi-family units subject to the Spokane uses development standards of 19.40.080(6)(1) Val :C.a, naunity' rtunity .....________ _ _________„..........a. APPLICANT: Chapter 19 .35 Residential „...4 NGreater Valley Support Density Bonus p o 19.35.045 Other Incentives to Q Network develop affordable housing Lino ADDRESS: Citywide o A. In addition to density � ® REQUEST: incentives... . may provide N Create Affordable Height and bulk bonuses I DC Housing Incentives in Fee waivers or exemptions Q addition to Density V Parking reductions Bonus Expedited permitting ....Valley TEXT AMENDMENT 11.11111.11. 1.1111111111.11111111.11111111111111.11m APPLICANT: ® Proposed Policy: Ni Greater Valley Allow for the development pSupport Network of a broad range of housing LA oADDRESS: Citywide types, including, but not � ® REQUEST: limited to, single family, N Add Housing multi-family, manufactured � Policies to support a homes, micro-housing, co- Q broad and diverse housing and other types. U range of housing S���, options jley.w ,, TEXT AMENDMENT APPLICANT: Goal : Develop Protocoi ii- Greater ValleySu ort Developers and Neighborhoods pp that Ensures: CD Network Early engagement with � o ADDRESS: Citywide neighborhood and projects � ® REQUEST: Develops guidelines for 0 Develop and establish best constructive communication Npracticesprotocol for between developers and neighborhoods Q development proposal that Create clear process for U affect neighborhood living Neighborhood Proposal environments Review .0"....... ....Valley TEXT AMENDMENT IIIIIII'll APPLICANT: The request would provide Ni Naomi assistance to manufactured 0 home park ( MHP) residents Q Eisentrager when forced to relocate by LA o ADDRESS: closure. o Will place burden on the MHP � Citywide owners in addition to that placed N o REQUEST: on them by RCW 51.20 � Add Manufactured Manufactured/Mobile Home Q Landlord-Tenant Act. V Home Displacement o Will require the City to review, Policies approve and administer a MHP *Wane Relocation and Report Plan . ....Valley mry TEXT AMENDMENT Map Overlay Spokane mmunitVa1y of Opportu 1ey Conity IIIII1 APPLICANT: Text Proposal � CPM Development Add Mineral Resource CD Corporation Land Chapter � ® ADDRESS: Citywide ® Map Proposal � ® REQUEST: Create a Mineral Resource cv Develop a Mineral Land Use Designation oC Resource Land Designate Sites as Mineral � Designation Overlay Resource Lands Siolane jY2oftLTEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT i -___.------------------ 1----- , L ci.,...f ..---- .. ._, • __ ____--_____--7.-------- - -) ., .._ 1 .----.--N-„,.. \ --... I---, \ , ENE MEW MI . L- ) --.--77<•. - ...- -_ Ifidwad 1110 .I .--1-1 f- •'= -'... • ' — - --,. IM "• "' 4 I ..,-, ' 1 1 ,.., mmL i -,----- MI .._ /1-- _ _ ji nallin VI . 1- 1-11 1 111:11il..,..... _ ---P-• m nom- _ r.,_ ,..... . . _ - -___ _ -, , - _ / OIL 1- -I ... s \ ''-L- - . / willtfil• —1111112r -r-CAR 15-901,1 M. -- o m.c •i-,,—_ ---,7-.2-_---111. --'-----_i/V- FIE 161 IN • -' .. -. 1 . 10 15003 --*,..--- _,II . •—re 0 tel HER apir T.C.rei, ..11 =111111 == • CAR 154014-Obi ill - j" IIII. Edr - I IIMMIllr'm h.. , CA R 15-042E_ 1 LOR to C imal_111 DRato..ID,It Immillh, HDR to CNIU , . .71 , - .GAR 1541424 JO' Al II I 7- I- • '''.-:! _ r•--: %,...-.'ifilp -asim „......... • . .. . MDR to HDR III: ,-'" . --.- .i 119 ' I li i.,-: ._ ..__ .-,- . ".•,- _i_.. Ai km_ •_. - -\:..,..... -- ,. .. . _ ,.. i--- , • . - 1 m, 1 1 ' • ' . INEwr-A 1,1PMNIIIMIa"- --"r"-- - ,. . ) :_. -,,, "...-- -..'L Ili V - m irmmi N I AR 154110-0011 1M I wi-1E408_001, GA R 154104.007 .0 to C MU or NC ei . ''.... .)1 liNi - _-.,-,-I - - 1 .Nomi lacm to H DR =6m min to cm u...Ns 0 I I= 0 -=.- 1 _ 17._::4-17 ' lit - ._ _, ,,,,,411._•._ _ l ____Innamm ..L..= _ - - ------ : 4•11. 1.1121 4 ....... .• : , "1 . . .11. ,.. III nil 7.,t,"...... lie 4. .1_ kilLA:= It' ........ I.. - 'Ll-,. - ' 1, =0,„,....... r ivirz his=mas.r.„ ,weitimir wiligirfti gii I 114100 Alf 41. krillk m I Overlay Locations \1111711.p.MEEMMIW. 1*...'1.6.4\111"111kliklarrli diarilli ghfic, Legend SARA pp licatioil Desenption of 10 =MEIMMILii_me.s\II=11111.1MM.I =MMIEIrgt( 'ft Comprehensive PI.11 i Nuf1115&E RINI ALS.1 M ..,LIMilight."15===1111\ 110=1 _ 'CO CA1'11541418 L.8":1.1iel°DP.:19MtkahriCarti Chttla';- EMelillikilhibliMINIC14111611117rWliair II I -1Io 1.10101111.;1 11111111EF iliirdasal .- .•.‘.• . .-; De.elop Man beriotered la MIIINVE All ii. •' • . --r., CAR 154°25 Nome Park Over lay IN ii, I wiraitipvi q -- - iiiik Nrorpieft. fedi ME.• ' • . - ''''' Mc) I M . I MI= ....Ai CialltAld dig gilei MIL r.i-^E"WM q1.1) ,CN ' '-'i I um) APPLICANT: Naomi Eisentrager o ADDRESS: Citywide � o REQUEST: Develop a Manufactured N Home Park Overlay V •-••\, Sliokane j„n�l�m� TEXT AMENDMENT i -___.------------------ 1----- , L ci.,...f ..---- .. ._, • __ ____--_____--7.-------- - -) ., .._ 1 .----.--N-„,.. \ --... I---, \ , ENE MEW MI . L- ) --.--77<•. - ...- -_ Ifidwad 1110 .I .--1-1 f- •'= -'... • ' — - --,. IM "• "' 4 I ..,-, ' 1 1 ,.., mmL i -,----- MI .._ /1-- _ _ ji nallin VI . 1- 1-11 1 111:11il..,..... _ ---P-• m nom- _ r.,_ ,..... . . _ - -___ _ -, , - _ / OIL 1- -I ... s \ ''-L- - . / willtfil• —1111112r -r-CAR 15-901,1 M. -- o m.c •i-,,—_ ---,7-.2-_---111. --'-----_i/V- FIE 161 IN • -' .. -. 1 . 10 15003 --*,..--- _,II . •—re 0 tel HER apir T.C.rei, ..11 =111111 == • CAR 154014-Obi ill - j" IIII. Edr - I IIMMIllr'm h.. , CA R 15-042E_ 1 LOR to C imal_111 DRato..ID,It Immillh, HDR to CNIU , . .71 , - .GAR 1541424 JO' Al II I 7- I- • '''.-:! _ r•--: %,...-.'ifilp -asim „......... • . .. . MDR to HDR III: ,-'" . --.- .i 119 ' I li i.,-: ._ ..__ .-,- . ".•,- _i_.. Ai km_ •_. - -\:..,..... -- ,. .. . _ ,.. i--- , • . - 1 m, 1 1 ' • ' . INEwr-A 1,1PMNIIIMIa"- --"r"-- - ,. . ) :_. -,,, "...-- -..'L Ili V - m irmmi N I AR 154110-0011 1M I wi-1E408_001, GA R 154104.007 .0 to C MU or NC ei . ''.... .)1 liNi - _-.,-,-I - - 1 .Nomi lacm to H DR =6m min to cm u...Ns 0 I I= 0 -=.- 1 _ 17._::4-17 ' lit - ._ _, ,,,,,411._•._ _ l ____Innamm ..L..= _ - - ------ : 4•11. 1.1121 4 ....... .• : , "1 . . .11. ,.. III nil 7.,t,"...... lie 4. .1_ kilLA:= It' ........ I.. - 'Ll-,. - ' 1, =0,„,....... r ivirz his=mas.r.„ ,weitimir wiligirfti gii I 114100 Alf 41. krillk m I Overlay Locations \1111711.p.MEEMMIW. 1*...'1.6.4\111"111kliklarrli diarilli ghfic, Legend SARA pp licatioil Desenption of 10 =MEIMMILii_me.s\II=11111.1MM.I =MMIEIrgt( 'ft Comprehensive PI.11 i Nuf1115&E RINI ALS.1 M ..,LIMilight."15===1111\ 110=1 _ 'CO CA1'11541418 L.8":1.1iel°DP.:19MtkahriCarti Chttla';- EMelillikilhibliMINIC14111611117rWliair II I -1Io 1.10101111.;1 11111111EF iliirdasal .- .•.‘.• . .-; De.elop Man beriotered la MIIINVE All ii. •' • . --r., CAR 154°25 Nome Park Over lay IN ii, I wiraitipvi q -- - iiiik Nrorpieft. fedi ME.• ' • . - ''''' Mc) I M . I MI= ....Ai CialltAld dig gilei MIL r.i-^E"WM q1.1) ,CN ' '-'i I