15-047.00 Bill Lawson, Hal Valley Apartments I & IIDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
MANSFIELD AVENUE CONNECTION PROJECT #0156
This Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into by and between Bill Lawson, Hal Valley Apartments I,
LLC and Hal Valley Apartments II, LLC, (collectively "Developer"), having offices for the transaction of
business at 12721 East Mansfield Ave, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206, and the City of Spokane
Valley ("City"), a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, hereinafter jointly referred to as
"Parties":
RECITALS
1. The City has designed and is planning to construct improvements to the Mansfield Avenue
corridor with Urban Corridor Program (UCP) grant funds from the Transportation Improvement Board
(TIB) and Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality (CMAQ) grant funds from the Federal Highways
Administration. The name of the project is the Mansfield Avenue Connection Project ("Project"), and the
purpose of this Project is to alleviate existing and future traffic congestion in this area by connecting two
separated roadway sections.
2. The Project will construct approximately 300 feet of new roadway; add sidewalks, bike lanes, and
striping to provide for a three -lane road section that continues uninterrupted between Pines Road and
Mirabeau Parkway.
3. Construction of the new roadway requires the acquisition of parts of seven parcels, full
acquisition of another parcel, and demolition of an existing six -unit apartment building.
4. The Developer is the owner/developer of certain real property generally located within the
Mansfield Avenue corridor, shown in Exhibit "A" ("Property").
5. The Developer intends to develop the Property for residential and/or commercial uses (the
"Development"), which will increase traffic congestion and directly impact existing transportation
infrastructure along the Mansfield corridor from and including the intersections with Pines Road and
Mirabeau Parkway.
6. The Parties recognize the need to construct the Project and that the likelihood of outside grant
funding for the Project's construction is positively influenced by private support for the Project.
7. On August 29, 2011, the Developer sent a letter to the City committing to pay $197,700 toward
construction of the Project, shown in Exhibit "B" ("Letter"), which is approximately 10% of the overall
estimated Project cost. That Letter was included in the grant application to the Washington State
Transportation Improvement Board ("TIB") and was instrumental in securing the remaining funds to
construct the Project.
8. The Parties are desirous of entering into an Agreement which provides a schedule for the
payment of Developer's commitment, and are voluntarily entering into this Agreement pursuant to RCW
82.02.020 to mitigate the direct impacts of the Development upon existing transportation facilities.
9. Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.060, and RCW 82.02.020, the City has the authority to allow a payment
to mitigate an impact that has been identified as a direct consequence of a proposed development. The
1
City has (1) identified future road projects necessitated by planned development in certain areas of the
City; and (2) identified a reasonable relationship between impacts generated by the Development to the
transportation system and the financial contribution toward those impacts.
AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions hereafter set forth, the
Developer and the City hereto agree as follows:
1. Voluntary Agreement. This Agreement, including all attached documents, is a voluntary
agreement as that term is used in RCW 82.02.020. The payment made herein is as outlined in an August
29, 2011 letter from the Developer to the City in support of the Project's construction. The Parties
acknowledge that the Project is reasonably necessary to mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the
Development. In the event this Agreement is determined by a court to be null and void, the City shall
refund the unexpended portion of fees within 60 days of such determination. Following a termination of
this Agreement, the Developer shall, as reasonably required, mitigate the direct traffic impacts of the
Development through the State Environmental Policy Act.
2. Project Funds. The Project is being funded from several sources, including the Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB), the City of
Spokane Valley, and private developers. Funds from FHWA and the City have been obligated; TIB funds
are to be released for the construction phase of the Project. See "Exhibit C".
3. Fee. The Developer shall pay $197,700 (10% of the project's estimated cost on August 29, 2011)
as a measure of support for the Project. This contribution shall be expended towards the design, right-of-
way acquisition, and construction of the Project. The fee is based upon the Developer's offer in a letter of
support for the Project dated August 29, 2011. See "Exhibit B".
4. Payment. To construct the Project, the Developer shall pay its full contribution no later than
May 1, 2015. The City shall notify the Developer of the Project bid date when it is determined. All
monies paid by the Developer shall be used as a portion of the local match required for the TIB grant
related to the construction of the Project.
5. Compliance with RCW 82.02.020. Payment collected by the City shall be held in a mitigation
fee reserve account and may only be expended to fund the design, right -of- way acquisition, and
construction of the Project. Payments shall be expended within five years of collection. The City shall be
entitled to reimbursement for any funds it may expend for the design, right-of-way acquisition, and
construction of the Project prior to the collection of the contribution. Any funds contributed but not
expended within five years shall be refunded by the City with interest as provided in RCW 82.02.020.
6. Notice. All communications, notices, or demands of any kind which a party under this
Agreement is required or desires to give to any other party shall be in writing and be either (1) delivered
personally, (2) sent by facsimile transmission with an additional copy mailed first class, or (3) deposited
in the U.S. mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested and addressed as follows:
2
If to the City:
If to the Developer:
City of Spokane Valley
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Fax: (509) 921-1008
Attn: Christine Bainbridge
Bill Lawson
Hal Valley Apartments, LLC
12721 East Mansfield
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
7. Successors. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors and
the assigns of the Parties.
8. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Washington. Any action for enforcement of this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent
jurisdiction in Spokane County, Washington or as otherwise provided by statute.
9. Modifications. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is
reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as the present Agreement.
10. Waiver. No officer, employee, agent, or otherwise of the City has the power, right, or authority
to waive any of the conditions or provisions to this Agreement. No waiver or any breach of this
Agreement shall be held to be a waiver of any other or subsequent breach.
11. Representation. This Agreement forms a fully integrated agreement between the Parties. No
other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to
exist or to bind any of the Parties hereto. This Agreement shall meet the mitigation requirements for
direct traffic -related impacts of the Development within the Project limits as described in the Project
description in Section 1 of the Recitals. This Agreement shall not supersede any other conditions of
approval not directly related to traffic -related impacts of the Development within the Project limits.
All Parties have read and understand all of the Agreement, and now state that no representation, promise,
or agreement not expressed in the Agreement has been made to induce any Party to execute the same.
12. Authority. Both Parties to this Agreement represent and certify that they have full authority and
power to enter into and carry out this Agreement. The persons signing this Agreement represent that they
have authority to act for and bind their respective principals.
13. Exhibits.
Exhibit A - Description and/or map of Developer's property
Exhibit B - Developer's August 29, 2011 letter
Exhibit C - TIB funding application
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement this/ day of//kod/--'
2015.
3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY:
%at�5 ti/f --
Mi, e Jackson, Ci anager
S
Chris : ainbridge, City Clerk
STATE OF WASHINGTON
County of Spokane
) ss.
APPROVED AS FORM:
Office pf the City A rney
Its:
On this day of 4d > , 2015 before me, the undersigned, a Notary
Public in and for the State ofjWashington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared
; /1 (%.hisork to me known to be the n'1Ccv1fii, /L!•(, 4Gr
of 4►4.✓MIS`% ,jPis i LJ.c r /{al //�Uvsrthe corporation that exe uted the foregoing instrument, and
acknowledged the instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of the corporation, for the uses and
purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated that he is authorized to execute the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal hereto affixed the day and year in this certificate above written.
ill I
‘0%1 ftii
\‘‘‘ I R E -8U�
i
Ltj 0,
NOTARY
U't PUBLIC
4,140
"� 'O / 1W 1S��
NO ARY PUBLI , m and for t
residing at 49.014.,GVH
My commission expires: cP-P�/S
/yft. RG62)It��,7.1
Printed Name
State of Washington,
4
Mansfield Ave Connection Project
45105.9068
WASH STATE DEPT NATURAL RESC
45101.9094
45103.0211.s
45104.9118
45094.0909
Shannon !'Av
UNION PACIFIC RAILROADCO.
45097.0001
45103:1304
808.4
9
404.18 808.4 Feet
0
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise
reliable.
GRANITE PAIN T'E APARTMENTS
Hal Valley Apartments LLC
12721 E. Mansfield
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
August 29, 2011
City of Spokane Valley
Att: Steve Worley, P.E.
Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Gentlemen,
Exhibit B
According to my conversation this morning with Neil Kersten, in order to apply for TIB
funds, we, the Developers of Granite Pointe Apartments, will commit to $197,700.00 to
be used as funds for the construction of connecting Mansfield Street to Pines Road from
the east where Mansfield ends to the west to Pines Road.
Also, another eight acres to the south of the Granite Pointe Apartments is proposed to be
broken into nine commercial lots.
Yours trt
T omas D. Hamilton
Member
Hal Valley Apartments LLC
Urban Funding Application
for Urban Arterial Program (UAP) & Urban Corridor Program (UCP)
Exhibit C
Mail your signed application and required attachments to the TIB Office no later than August 31, 2011.
The mailing address for the TIB Office: Post Office Box 40901 4. Olympia WA 98504-0901
For assistance contact Gloria Bennett, TIB Project Engineer, at (360) 586-1143 or via email at GloriaB@tib.wa.gov
Legislative
Agency Name SPOKANE VALLEY District(s) 4
Congressional
Arterial Name Mansfield Ave District(s) 5
Project Limits Pines Rd (SR27) to 200 -ft East of Houk Rd. Find Legislative or Congressional District
Average Daily
Length in Miles 0.21 miles Traffic (ADT) 3,422 vehicles per day
Federal Route Functional Class Urban Collector
Agency Contact Steve M. Worley, P.E. Phone Number 509-720-5014
Email Address sworley@spokanevalley.orq
APPLICATION ATTACHMENTS
Include the following attachments with all applications
2 Excerpt from adopted Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program showing project
2 Detailed vicinity map clearly showing project limits
2 Detailed project cost estimate signed by a professional engineer registered in Washington State
2 Typical roadway section(s)
• Funding commitment letters from all funding partners Number Attached 2
❑ Accident analysis worksheet Link to Request Accident Data from WSDOT
2 Excerpt from current agency Comprehensive Plan defining agency CBD & Urban Activity Center(s)
2 Written concurrence from WSDOT if project is on or connects to a state highway
I] Adopted Bicycle Plan if project includes bicycle facilities (if applicable)
2 Development map showing Permits Issued and Permits Pending areas (if applicable)
❑ Annexation agreement (if applicable)
❑ Map showing potential annexation area (if applicable)
Include only if project is Construction Ready
❑ Department of Archaeology & Historic Preservation (DAHP) documentation
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Enter target dates
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Date
Start Design Engineering Oct 2011
Environmental Documentation Complete & Permits Approved Jun 2012
Right of Way Acquisition Complete Jan 2013
PS&E Complete Mar 2013
Contract Advertisement Apr 2013
Contract Completion Oct 2013
Page 1 of 10
PROJECT FUNDING
TIB Fund Distribution
Are TIB funds distributed evenly through the project phases? NO
Enter justification for unbalanced TIB Fund Distribution in the cell below:
Federal CMAQ funds were received for PE and RW phases.
Enter Requested Total TIB Funds $ 792,700
Enter the Total Project Costs to the nearest dollar in cells F45 to F50
If TIB Fund Distribution is unbalanced, enter TIB funds In cells G45 to G50
Special Studies
Design Engineering
Right of Way
Construction Engineering
Construction Other
Construction Contract
TOTA
Maximum TIB Ratio 80.0%
TIB Funds Local Funds
125,900
900,000 900,000
86,500 74,000 12,500
25,900
1,976,800
718,700
792,700
Noneligible Engineering
Engineering exceeding 25% of construction costs is not eligible for 118 reimbursement
Other Noneligible Costs
(i.e. landscaping greater than 3% of total cost, utility undergrounding, sound walls)
TOTAL ELIGIBLE COST
FUNDING PARTNERS
Source
SPOKANE VALLEY
Federal - STP(U) - (Preliminary Eng. 8, ROW)
Developer ----
TOTAL.,__,
118 Matching Ratio
Total TIB Funds/Total Eligible Cost
145,700
1,184,100
0
,976,800
40%
Public or Private l Commitment
Letter
Public
Public YES
Private YES
Local funds are correct
Amount
98,900
887,500
197,700
,184,100
CERTIFICATION
Certification is hereby given that the information provided is accurate and the applicable attachments are complete and included
as part of application package
Agency Official Signa
Steve M. Worley, P.E., Senior C(tal�Pro'ects Engineer
Printed or Typed Nae &hi Title
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
3/ 1(
Date Signed
Page 2 of 10
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Describe the existing conditions
Mansfield is a 2 -lane roadway with curb and non -ADA compliant sidewalk on the south side that ends about 0.21
miles east of Pines. Mansfield west of Mirabeau Parkway is a 3 -lane roadway with curb and sidewalk that dead -ends
0.25 miles west of Mirabeau Parkway. There is currently no direct route connecting the two road segments. Mansfield
will be re-classified as a collector arterial upon completion of this project.
Describe the proposed improvements
Project will construct new roadway with sidewalks, bikes lanes, and curb/gutter to complete a missing gap; sidewalk
improvements on north side of existing street; sidewalk on south will be upgraded to meet ADA and remove
obstructions. On -street parking from Pines to Houk will be eliminated and the road widened to provide a center TWLT
lane and bike lanes. Stormwater improvements will provide treatment of surface runoff using grassy swales.
Describe the project benefits
Project completes important gap and provides direct access from Pines to large apartment complexes and proposed
commercial developments west of Mirabeau Parkway as projected in the City Comp Plan. The project will provide a
safer direct route north of the UPRR tracks relieving congestion on Indiana Ave and improving access to
CenterPlace, the YMCA, and surrounding commercial and residential developments.
PROJECT COMPONENTS
Give a brief description or select the appropriate response for each component of proposed project work
PROJECT TYPE New Roadway
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
Enter number of intersections where improvement is proposed
Add Traffic Signal 0 Add Roundabout 0
Modify Traffic Signal 0 Add Right Turn Pocket 0
Interconnect Signal 0 Add Left Turn Pocket 0
Remove Signal 0
DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS
New drainage facilities in the form of catch basins and storm sewer pipes will convey run-off to grassy swales. LID
stormwater gardens may be installed as appropriate and where ROW allows. All improvements will be constructed in
accordance with the Spokane Regional Stormwater Manual.
EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITY RELOCATION Relocate Overhead Utilities to New Overhead Location
OTHER UTILITY WORK
Utility pedestals and poles will be relocated behind new barrier curb and sidewalk.
ILLUMINATION, LANDSCAPING & AESTHETIC ELEMENTS
Street illumination will be reviewed and improvements made as necessary. Existing street lights will be replaced with
low energy lights. Landscaping will mostly consist of restoring existing landscaping disturbed by construction.
Hardscaping and native plants will be incorporated as ROW allows.
OTHER WORK
Retaining walls may be necessary along north edge of ROW through new gap portion of project to connect to
adjacent properties. The WSDOT designed Pines/Indiana intersection, part of the TIB -funded Pines/Mansfield
Project, anticipated this connection of Mansfield Ave, thus only one southbound left turn lane was included on Pines
..1. t.'..15.+..n
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Page 3 of 10
ROADWAY GEOMETRICS
Enter the existing and proposed geometrics
If more than one section
enter Percent of Total Length
SECTION ONE
SECTION TWO
60%
40%
Existing
I Proposed
Existing
Proposed
Pavement Width
Curb to Curb or Edge to Edge
40 feet
46 feet
0 feet
46 feet
Number of General Purpose Lanes
Do NOT Include Transit/HOV or Continuous Lt Turn Lane
2 lanes
2 lanes
0 lanes
2 lanes
Number of HOV/Transit Lanes
Do NOT Include Continuous Left Turn Lane
0 lanes
0 lanes
0 lanes
0 lanes
Continuous Left Turn Lane Width
0 feet
12 feet0
12 feet
Shoulder or Parking Width
Enter Average Width per Side
8 feet
0 feet
0 feet
0 feet
Shoulder or Parking Placement
Both Sides
None
None
None
Shoulder or Parking Surfacing
Surfaced
None
Surfaced
Curb Placement
Both Sides
Both Sides
None
Both Sides
Bicycle Lane Type
No Bicycle
Facilities
Bike Lane
No Bicycle
Facilities
Bike Lane
Bicycle Lane Width
5 feet
5 feet
Pedestrian Buffer
Width between Curb and Sidewalk
0 feet
3 feet
Sidewalk Placement
One Side
Both Sides
None
Both Sides
Sidewalk Widths
5 feet
5 feet
6 feet
1 Sidewalk with curb separation on both sides is required by TIB policy
Minimum width is five feet with NO obstructions
Sections that do not meet this standard require a Board Deviation at Project Selection
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Page 4of10
SAFETY
Annual Benefit from Urban Accident Analysis Worksheet $14,754
PROJECT DEFICIENCIES
Select Deficiency Type from the dropdown menu. Describe the existing deficiency within the project limits
Describe the corrective measure(s) that eliminates or mitigates the deficiency.
DEFICIENCY 1 OBSTRUCTIONS
Deficiency Utility poles are located in center of sidewalk, preventing adequate clearance for pedestrians.
Corrective
Measure(s)
Utility poles and other obstructions will be relocated outside of sidewalk to provide 5 -ft minimum
clear distance.
DEFICIENCY 2 OBSTRUCTIONS
Deficiency Existing curb ramps do not meet ADA standards.
Corrective Curb Ramps will be replaced with ADA compliant curb ramps.
Measure(s)
DEFICIENCY 3 ACCESS CONTROL/PARKING
Deficiency No Bike Facilities. Bicyclists must share travel lanes with vehicles, increasing likelihood of
bicycle/vehicle conflicts.
Corrective The project will construct dedicated bike lanes to separate bicyclists from vehicles.
Measure(s)
DEFICIENCY 4 RAILROAD CROSSING
Deficiency There are two railroad crossings: adjacent to Pines & Indiana and Mirabeau Parkway & Indiana Ave.
Corrective This project will allow traffic accessing the growing commercial and residential developments
Measure(s) surrounding the project to bypass the railroad crossings from the east or west.
DEFICIENCY 5 ALIGNMENT
Deficiency Vehicle traffic from east of road gap currently cuts through an apartment complex parking lot to
circumnavigate the gap in the roadway, increasing potential pedestrian -vehicle collisions.
Construction of roadway gap will provide adequate access for vehicles traveling to and from the
apartment complexes and adjacent commercial developments.
Corrective
Measure(s)
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agus 2011
Page 5 of 10
MOBILITY
Select Truck Route Classification from dropdown list
Not a TRUCK ROUTE
NETWORK DEVELOPMENT
Select the appropriate option from the following list
❑ Completes Corridor
Enter termini of corridor being completed
Project must meet ALL of the following criteria to qua/ify as COMPLETES CORRIDOR
Project is last stage of corridor between logical limits
1 Corridor connects state route to state route OR state route to port
Corridor is a minimum of 2 miles in length
1 The entire corridor is constructed to urban standards
El Completes Gap Along Federal Route
Existing route must meet urban standards
El Extends Improvements Along Federal Route
Existing route must meet urban standards
❑ Project does NOT Complete or Extend improvements and is NOT a New Route
FREIGHT FACILITY ACCESS
Select Freight Facility Access provided by project
No Freight Facility Access Improvements
Mark ALL freight -carrying modes accessing the facility
❑ Airplane ❑ Rail ❑ Ship ❑ Truck
Enter Trucks per Day
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT/URBAN ACTIVITY CENTER ACCESS
Select CBD/Urban Activity Center Access provided by project
Connects to Urban Activity Center
Briefly describe the CBD/Activity Center access improvement
The project connects the multi -family residential and commercial developments located on Mirabeau Parkway east of
the project with SR -27 and Montgomery Ave. It also provides alternative access to the Valley YMCA, CenterPlace
Community Center to avoid RR crossings and improve the flow of traffic.
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 201 1
Page 6 of 10
SUSTAINABILITY
❑ Agency has Adopted Greenhouse Gas Emissions Policy
Enter Policy Number Adoption Date
MODAL MEASURES
Select modal measures within the project limits
❑ Completes gap in HOV system
❑ Adds HOV lanes in each direction
❑ Adds Queue Jump or Transit Only Lane
Peak Hour Transit Buses
Enter Number 4
Bicycle Facility
Select option that applies
Enter Gap Location
Enter Location(s)
Project COMPLETES GAP in bicycle lane or path
ENERGY MEASURES
Select energy measures within the project limits
L Replace or install Low Energy Lighting
❑ Add Solar -powered Signage
Describe the measures below
Existing street lights shall be replaced with low energy lights.
ENVIRONMENTAL MEASURES
Select environmental measures within the project limits
0 Incorporates Hardscaping or Climate -appropriate Plantings
Describe the measures below
Project will incorporate hardscaping and climate appropriate plants into landscaping as ROW allows.
❑ Incorporates Low Impact Drainage Practices
Describe the measures below
RECYCLING MEASURES
Select recycling measures within the project limits
D On-site Grinding & Re -use of Pavement
❑ Use of Base Treatment to avoid overexcavation
❑ Project uses Stockpiled Recycle Materials
Describe the measures below
Existing asphalt shall be planed and stockpiled for use as substitute for a portion of crushed base course rock
throughout the project.
OTHER MEASURES
❑ Incorporates other sustanability measures
Describe the measures below
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Page 7of10
GROWTH & DEVELOPMENT
Employment Center Square Footage added in conjunction with the project
Include Development Map designating Permits Issued and Permits Pending areas
Permits Issued 42,823 sq ft
Permits Pending 0 sq ft
Include Development Map showing Permits Issued & Permits Pending
locations with your application
Total Residential Density In Persons per Square Mile (ppsm)
Current 2,570 ppsm Permits Issued 2,837 ppsm Permits Pending
Supports Annexation Agreement
Select from the options below
❑ Project required by Annexation Agreement
❑ Joint city/county application for project within Potential Annexation Area
❑ Project lies within Potential Annexation Area
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Page 8 of 10
GROWTH MANAGEMENT INFORMATION
Complete the questions below to address Land Use Implications as directed by Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 47.26.282.
Describe how the project supports or revitalizes existing urban development in the downtown
The project directly supports new and existing urban commercial and residential development in Spokane Valley.
The areas adjacent to Mansfield and surrounding the YMCA and CenterPlace Community Center are undergoing
significant commercial and high density residential development and are expected to experience significant traffic
growth. Development also continues to the east of the project along Indiana Ave, surrounding the Spokane Valley
Mall and adjacent to Mirabeau Parkway. The City includes this gap project in their Comprehensive Plan. Extending
Mansfield will add an additional east -west route parallel to Indiana Ave that allows traffic to easily access the new
traffic configuration at Pines and provide an alternative route to avoid the UPRR crossings at Mirabeau Parkway and
at Pines Rd. This helps alleviate congestion on Pines Rd and Mirabeau Parkway from frequent train crossings.
Describe how the project includes or encourages infill/densification of residential or commercial development consistent with your
local comprehensive plan?
The area adjacent to Mansfield Ave. and Mirabeau Parkway is currently undergoing significant infill development.
Land Use goal #7 in the City Comp Plan directs the City to develop a balanced transportation network that
accommodates multiple forms of transportation for vehicles and pedestrians. The project proposes to increase
capacity, improve safety, and provide pedestrians and bicycle facilities critical to accommodating higher density
developments as the burdens placed on existing infrastructure increase. Land Use Goal #16 directs the City to
provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Pedestrian and bicycle friendly improvements in the project
encourage interaction throughout the adjacent neighborhoods and promotes higher density developments. The
project serves as an important link for connecting new developments to the improved traffic infrastructure at Pines
Describe how the project promotes the use of transit and other multimodal transportation
The proposed project includes pedestrian and bicycle facilities to safely promote the use of alternative transportation
options. STA bus route #32 can be accessed at Pines and Mansfield and Indiana & Mirabeau Parkway at 30 minute
headways. Route #74 can be accessed at Pines and Indiana and at Mirabeau Parkway & Indiana during peak
morning and afternoon hours. The Mirabeau Park & Ride transit center is located approximately 1/4 mile southeast
of the project on Indiana Ave.
Indicate the project's multimodal transportation components
Mark ALL existing or planned components
0 Sidewalk 0 Bicycle Lanes ❑ HOV Lanes J❑ Access to Transit Center or Passenger Terminal
�✓ Other - Explain in space below
Improves access to Centennial Trail at Mirabeau Parkway. Also improves access to proposed Spokane Valley -
Millwood Trail (a non -vehicle shared use pathway along abandoned Great Northern Railroad ROW) adjacent to
Indiana Ave 1/2 block south of the project. Improves access to STA Park & Ride located on Indiana Ave.
approximately 114 mile southeast of project.
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Page 9 of 10
Transportation Improvement Board (TIB)
Growth Management Information
Funding Program
Agency Name
Project Name
Urban Arterial Program (UAP) & Urban Corridor Program (UCP)
SPOKANE VALLEY
Mansfield Ave - Pines Rd (SR27) to 200 -ft East of Houk Rd.
Project Intent Project completes important gap and provides direct access from Pines to large apartment
complexes and proposed commercial developments west of Mirabeau Parkway as projected in the
City Comp Plan. The project will provide a safer direct route north of the UPRR tracks relieving
congestion on Indiana Ave and improving access to CenterPlace, the YMCA, and surrounding
commercial and residential developments.
Describe how the project supports or revitalizes existing urban development in the downtown
The project directly supports new and existing urban commercial and residential development in Spokane Valley.
The areas adjacent to Mansfield and surrounding the YMCA and CenterPlace Community Center are undergoing
significant commercial and high density residential development and are expected to experience significant traffic
growth. Development also continues to the east of the project along Indiana Ave, surrounding the Spokane Valley
Mall and adjacent to Mirabeau Parkway. The City includes this gap project in their Comprehensive Pian. Extending
Mansfield will add an additional east -west route parallel to Indiana Ave that allows traffic to easily access the new
traffic configuration at Pines and provide an alternative route to avoid the UPRR crossings at Mirabeau Parkway and
at Pines Rd. This helps alleviate congestion on Pines Rd and Mirabeau Parkway from frequent train crossinas.
Describe how the project includes or encourages infill/densification of residential or commercial development consistent with your
local comprehensive plan?
The area adjacent to Mansfield Ave. and Mirabeau Parkway is currently undergoing significant infill development.
Land Use goal #7 in the City Comp Plan directs the City to develop a balanced transportation network that
accommodates multiple forms of transportation for vehicles and pedestrians. The project proposes to increase
capacity, improve safety, and provide pedestrians and bicycle facilities critical to accommodating higher density
developments as the burdens placed on existing infrastructure increase. Land Use Goal #16 directs the City to
provide a street system that connects neighborhoods. Pedestrian and bicycle friendly improvements in the project
encourage interaction throughout the adjacent neighborhoods and promotes higher density developments. The
nroiect serves as an important link for connectins new developments to the improved traffic infrastructure at Pines
Describe how the project promotes the use of transit and other multimodal transportation
The project adds the following multimodal components:
Sidewalk Bicycle Lanes Access to Transit Center or Passenger Terminal
Other Multimodal Components:
Improves access to Centennial Trail at Mirabeau Parkway. Also improves access to proposed Spokane Valley -
Millwood Trail (a non -vehicle shared use pathway along abandoned Great Northern Railroad ROW) adjacent to
Indiana Ave 1/2 block south of the project. Improves access to STA Park & Ride located on Indiana Ave.
approximately 1/4 mile southeast of project.
Urban Funding Application
Revised 18 Agust 2011
Page 10 of 10
Urban Accident Analysis
for Urban Arterial Program (UAP) & Urban Corridor Program (UCP)
INSTRUCTIONS
• Use Accident Data from the three most current years
4 Select the Location Type (Intersection or Midblock)
Agency SPOKANE VALLEY
Project Name Mansfield Ave - Pines Rd (SR27) to 200 -ft East of
Houk Rd.
4' Enter the Location by specifying the intersection cross street or midblock parameters
• Enter the number of Property Damage Only (PDO) Accidents, Injuries and Fatalities for each Accident Type
• Enter the Primary Countermeasure to eliminate or mitigate the accident experience
PDO Accidents
Injuries
Fatalities
Total Number Factor Accident Cost i I Annual Benefit
2
1
$5,064
$284,956
$3,366,388
$10,128
$284,956
TOTAL
3 $295,084
$14,754
Data entered 25 Aug 2011
Select Enter Accident Location
cation Type (Cross Street or Midblock Location)
Select Accident Type
Midblock 12300
Fixed Object/Parked
Vehicle
Enter Number Enter Enter
of Number of Number of Enter Primary Countermeasure
PDO Accidents Injuries Fatalities
2 Remove On -street Parking
Intersection Cherry Rd Right Angle
Improve Ilumination Install
Pedestrian Facilities
TIB Urban Accident Analysis
Page 1
Grant Application Cost Estimate
Project Name: Mansfield Extension, SR27 to 200.ft East of Houk Rd.
3 Lane Section, Bike lanes, Sidewalks, 0.21 mi.
Prepared By:
Preparation Date:
Bryan D. Hicks, P.E.
Aug. 24, 2011
Spokane
Valley
ITEM#
MOOT STD.
SPEC.
WSDOTSTD.#
ITEM DESCRIPTION
UNIT OF
MEASURE
PLANNED
QUANTITY
ESTIMATED UNIT
PRICE
ESTIMATED ITEM
PRICE
1
1-09.7
0001
MOBILIZATION
L.S.
1
$ 54,000.00
$ 54,000
2
1-05.4
7038
ROADWAY SURVEYING
L.S.
1
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000
3
1-05.4
7040
LICENSED SURVEYING
L.S.
1
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000
4
1-05.4
7047
MONUMENT CASE, COVER & PIPE
EACH
1
$ 1,000.00
S 1,000
5
1-07.15
7736
SPCC PLAN
L.S.
1
$ 500.00
$ 500
6
1-10
PROJECT SIGN
EACH
1
$ 750.00
$ 750
7
1-10
6992
LABOR FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL
HR.
100
$ 50.00
$ 5,000
8
1-10.3
8982
CONSTRUCTION SIGNS, CLASS A
S.F.
100
$ 10.00
5 1,000
9
1-10.3
6971
PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
L.S.
1
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000
10
2-01
0035
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
L.S.
1
$ 5,000.00
$ 5,000
11
2-02
0050
REMOVAL OF STRUCTURES AND OBSTRUCTIONS
L.S.
1
S 5,000.00
$ 5,000
12
2-02
SAWCUT ASPHALT PAVEMENT
L.F.
300
$ 2.00
$ 600
13
2-02
0120
REMOVE ASPHALT PAVEMENT
S.Y.
$ 2.00
$ -
14
2-03
0310
ROADWAY EXCAVATION & EMBANKMENT, INCL. HAUL
C.Y.
3,272
$ 17.00
$ 55,624
15
2-03
ROCK EXCAVATION
C.Y.
$ 100.00
$ -
16
4-04
5095
CRUSHED SURFACING BASE COURSE
C.Y.
670
$ 45.00
$ 30,150
17
4-04
5115
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE
C.Y.
881
$ 45.00
$ 39,645
18
5-04
HMA -CL'1/2',PG64.28,MISC. AREAS
S.Y.
$ 30.00
$ -
19
5-04
HMA CL. 1/2', 0.17 FT. DEPTH, PG 70-28
S.Y.
5,022
$ 10.00
$ 50,220
20
5-04
HMA CL. 3/4", 0.33 FT. DEPTH, PG 70-28
S.Y.
5,022
$ 19.00
$ 95,418
21
6-13, 8-24
7164?
MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL
S.F.
2,000
$ 30.00
$ 60,000
22
7-04
3577
SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 12 IN. DIAM
L.F.
225
$ 55.00
$ 12,375
23
7-04
3578
SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 16 IN. DIAM
L.F.
800
$ 50,00
$ 40,000
24
7-04
3579
SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 18 IN. DIAM
L.F.
$ 55.00
$ -
25
7-04
3582
SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 24 IN. DIAM
L.F.
$ 65.00
$ -
26
7-05
1062
PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE B -SWALE
EACH
5
$ 3,500.00
$ 17,500
27
7-05
7360
MANHOLE 481N DIAM TYPE, W/ FRAME & GRATE
EACH
3
$ 2,500.00
$ 7,500
28
7-05
3091
CATCH BASIN TYPE 1, W/ FRAME & GRATE
EACH
8
$ 1,500.00
$ 12,000
29
7-05
CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 W/ OIL/WATER SEPARATOR
EACH
$ 1,800.00
$ -
30
7-05
3105
CATCH BASIN TYPE 2, 48 IN DIA. W/ FRAME & GRATE
EACH
$ 3,000.00
$ -
31
7-05.3
3100
ADJUST FRAME AND GRATE
EACH
$ 350.00
$ -
32
7-05.3
3080
ADJUST MANHOLE
EACH
3
$ 550.00
$ 1,650
33
6243
ADJUST VALVE BOX
EACH
9
$ 300.00
$ 2,700
34
8-01
TEMPORARY EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL
L.S.
1
$ 3,000.00
$ 3,000
35
8-02
SWALE EXCAVATION INC. HAUL
C.Y.
400
$ 20.00
$ 8,000
36
8-02
6405
TOPSOIL TYPE A
C.Y.
125
$ 35.00
$ 4,375
37
8-02
6410
TOPSOIL TYPE B
C.Y.
0
$ 20.00
$ -
38
8-02
6414
SEEDING, FERTILIZING, MULCHING
ACRE
0
$ 3,000.00
$ -
39
8-02
6555
SOD INSTALLATION
S.Y.
2,500
$ 9.00
$ 22,500
40
8-03
6071
IRRIGATION SYSTEM
L.S.
1
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000
41
8-04
6701
CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB
L.F.
$ 14.00
$ -
42
8-04
6700
CEMENT CONC. TRAFFIC CURB & GUTTER
L.F.
1,920
$ 12,00
$ 23,040
43
8-04
6707
CEMENT CONC. PEDESTRIAN CURB
L.F.
100
S 25.00
$ 2,500
44
8-04
1070
CEMENT CONC./QUARRY SPALL SPILLWAY
S.Y.
0
$ 50.00
$ -
45
8-06
7059
CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH
S.Y.
200
$ 35.00
$ 7,000
46
8-13
7081
FENCING - CHAIN LINK OR WOOD
L.F.
$ 25.00
$ -
47
8-14
7055
CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
S.Y.
1,280
$ 30.00
$ 38,400
48
8-14
7058
CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE A
EACH
6
$ 1,200.00
$ 7,200
49
8-14
7054
RAMP DETECTABLE WARNING RETROFIT
EACH
$ 300.00
$ -
50
8-18
REMOVE AND RESET MAILBOX
EACH
6
$ 150.00
$ 900
51
8-20
6912
TRAFFIC SIGNAL Loops @ Pines?
L.S.
$ 5,000.00
$ -
52
8-20
6904
ILLUMINATION SYSTEM
L.S.
1
$ 10,000.00
$ 10,000
53
8-20
6945
SCHEDULE 40 CONDUIT PIPE 2 IN. DIAM.
L.F.
$ 12.00
$
54
8-21
6890
PERMANENT SIGNING
L.S.
1
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000
55
8-22
6857
PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE
S.F.
$ 10.00
$ -
56
8-22
6807
PLASTIC TRAFFIC STRIPE
L.F.
3,840
$ 2.00
$ 7,680
57
8-22
6817
PLASTIC WIDE TRAFFIC STRIPE
L.F.
1,920
$ 3.00
$ 5,760
58
8-22
6833
PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW
EACH
6
$ 100.00
$ 600
59
8.22
6859
PLASTIC TRAFFIC STOP LINE
L.F.
100
$ 12.00
$ 1,200
60
8-23
6888
TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING
L.F.
1,100
$ 0.50
$ 550
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
$ 675,337
Contingency (20%)
Inflation Adjustment Factor (4%/yr)
Construction Sub -Total
PE (15%) STP(U) Funded
CE (10%)
Right Of Way, STP(U) Funded
Purchase Apartment Bldg, Demolish, Relocate Residents, STP(U) Funded
2 years
TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE
Cost Estimate Assumptions:
6" HMA over 8" CSBC Pavement Section
6-0 sidewalk on both sides
Bryan D. Hicks, P.E., (WA #37448)
S 135,067
$ 54,027
S 864,431
S 125,900
S 88,443
$ 150,000
$ 750,000
$ 1,976,774
PE $ 125,900
ROW $ 900,000
CN $ 950,874
TOTAL $ 1,976,774
° 1NA�IGQNIlrMAI
'
�-SIDE6WALK
3.5'
BIKE
LANE
LANE
LANE
MANSFIELD AVENUE
CONNECTION PROJECT
PINES (SR -27) TO 200 FT EAST OF HOUK
EXHIBIT MAP
SEC. 19 T. 25N. R. 45E.W.M.
12•
LANE
BIKE
LANE
6'
SIDEWALK
10-,
Imo•
Mansfield Ave Connection Project Area Map
4
,45105.9068;
45103.0259
451019094.
•
a 45104.9100'"'nl
—• , O 3 •I�`
13 .N �Ig v
U'r
a; a
. a Ir
kL.7O' 0.• •
w -•.r
{ a
:Od
O O , .1_,
r ? a ,I
'-G J N N. �.
NW
•
"r=5r��f0KAN�ErV -U-
p/Iontgomer! �.
lPllansfield Av - ,mss--"'�•` ,
:Mansfieeid.Av- ~ ��
r -j
•
6;' ••
0
C r '45103.0215-4. - I 0 '
5103 0215'Io' �'
II W �
717:1"-:----:-..
i �
;Shannon Av
45097 00011 _r
Indiana Av _
v
O.
;0
a Ct
.;o o bGf o o _oma X451049064" {'Y
0ru NT Y' ^' ��_mr r} y
14' to � .ul _ t.l . . Wr.
Oras✓ r
45103.0299
45103 0231... ';:: ' _ vR
I"
45103.0201
893.1
9
44.57 8931 Feet
45097 0001 ~ ,
-
rAte
r\Tp
O
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise
reliable.
45104-
0 9150
4
Project / Description / Current Status
Adopted 2012 - 2017
Six -Year Transportation Improvement Program
Dollars in Thousands
Funding
Length PE RW CN Total Sources
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total
1 Argonne Road -190 to Trent,
S
0.38 0 0 582 582 City 79 79
CMAQ 503 503
Revise Signal Phasing, Add NB Right Tum Lane at Montgomery, Intersection Improvements at Knox
Funding Secured (SRTC 06-31), City Project #0060
Project Total 582 582
2 Pines Corridor ITS: Sprague to Trent
S
Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor
Funding Secured (SRTC 06-26), City Project #0061
2.26 56 125 1,593 1,775 City 238 238
CMAQ 1,537 1,537
Project Total 1,775 1,775
3 Greenacres Trail, Sullivan Rd. to Liberty Lake 0 50 0 0 50 City
s (PE Only) Other 50 50
Fed
Preliminary planning for shared use pathway on abandoned Railroad right-of-way
PE Funded
Project Total 50 50
4 Mansfield Ave Connection - Pines(SR27) to 200- 0.21 63 675 0 738 City 100 100
s ft east of Houk Rd (PE/RW Only) CMAQ 638 638
Construct 3 -lane arterial gap connection from Pines to Houk, w/ sidewalk, curb, and stormwater facilities
PE/RW funded by CMAQ (SRTC #10-12) City Project #
Project Total 738 738
Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and
are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions.
6/29/2011
Page 1
April 20, 2011
Mr. Steve Worley
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E Sprague, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Spokane Regional Transportation Council
221 W. First Avenue, Suite 310 • Spokane, WA 99201-3613
509/343-6370 FAX: 509/343-6400
Subject: 2010 Call for Projects — Selected Project -- CMAQ Funds
Dear Mr. Worley
On March 10, 2011 the Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) adopted a
prioritized list of projects that was developed from the 2010 call for projects. The SRTC
Board selected from the prioritized list, projects based on current and anticipated funding
levels. The project name and approved federal funding level Is listed below.
Federal
1D# Project Name Request
Srtc10-12 Mansfield Ave Connection (PE, RW) $887,500
As you can see, an ID number has been assigned to this project which MUST be used on all
correspondence relating to this project, including funding requests to the State.
We anticipate this project will be in the amended STIP in April 2011, after which you may
seek obligation of the funds through WSDOT Local Programs. Should you have questions,
please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Glenn F. Miles
Transportation Manager
cc: Bill McCammon, WSDOT
ANL
VW"
Washington State
-s" Department of Transportation
Paula J, Hammond, P.E.
Secretary of Transportation
August 22, 2011
Bryan Hicks, P.E.
Century West Engineering
1825 N. Hutchinson Road - 2" Floor
Spokane, Washington 99212
Eastern Region
2714 N. Mayfair Street
Spokane, WA 99207-2050
509-324-6000
Fax 509-324-6005
TTY: 1-800.833-6388
www wsdot.wa.gov
RE: City of Spokane Valley TIB project applications
Dear Bryan,
The Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Eastern Region concurs
with all three proposed projects.
Mansfield Avenue Connection
Pines/16'" Ave/SR 27 Safety Improvements
Progress Road Sidewalk — SR 290 to Wellesley Ave.
All work on or intersecting with State Routes shall meet current WSDOT ADA
requirements If during development of these projects you determine the need to encroach
into the State Routes, the paving depths, surfacing, and any associated saw cuts will
require approval of the WSDOT Eastern Region Materials Engineer prior to project
advertisement. If the projects propose to impact the geometries of any intersection with
the State Routes (for example adding pedestrian bulb outs, changing corner radii,
changing lane configuration, etc) you will need design approval and an intersection plan
approval from WSDOT. Also, any construction traffic control impacting the State
Routes will require pre -approval from the WSDOT Eastern Region Traffic Engineer.
As this project moves forward I encourage you to contact Ken Olson at 509-324-6100.
Ken will be able to assist you in coordinating WSDOT reviews and approvals that may
be required including WSDOT concurrence to advertise for construction.
We look forward to working with the City on these projects.
Sin erely,,
/;-/tee
ichael A. Frucci, PE
Assistant Regional Administrator for Development
WSDOT, Eastern Region
509-324-6020
Railroad
Frederick
Fairview
Grace
Buckeye
\Carlisl
Ermina
a
O
c
Marlett
v
a
m
c
ate.
Mansfield
Nora
a
0
Maxwell
d
L
U
Building Permits: 2010 - 2011
a Commercial
Residential
Parcels
Sections
N
Shannon
Indiana
Mansfield
Mission
Maxwell
a
Sinto
Sinto
0
a
Maxwell
Sinto
Map 2.1
Land Use
9
4.1
I Co....sLec
06
2445
to,
Legend
I Mixed Use Center
Corridor Mixed Use
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
1111 High Density Residential
Office
Neighborhood Commercial
Community Commercial
gig Regional Commercial
Light Industrial
1111 Heavy Industrial
II Park/Open Space
Es Water Bodies
Effective Date: 05/11/2011
Ordinance No. 11-009
4
Map Location
555
VCXr
0 0.5 2 Miles
11111111i
h'orice: The informer, on shown orr 'nap is comp( led from various
sources mid is subject to constant revision. The Ciry makes no claims
or guarantees about dre accuracy or crerency of this map and
expressly diselorars lrobiliryfOC Mena and ornissform its
To confirm accuracy conract the Cily of Spokane Valley, Cowman°,
Development Depomment Division of Planning, (509) 921-1000.
Product of the City of Spoktme Curatuuttlty 0.915151
Plante's Ferry sv
City of
Spokane
ShicI/i Park
(alionelfaha Rocks)
Orchardolve
Park n o�
zrer,n
vatinErffli
Tow -of Millwrod
�{}i eaey
Knox
Vallev:Mfssion
Park
Greene
P Pot d . , n1�E1mi 1
31111-
` ang Balfour e
1-1 H,RN. qP&LE
`-4 r�
rk R a
Camp
Caro
■ NH 1T
Dishman Hills
n.s T
lller Conservation
Map 3.2
Bike and Pedestrian
System
Legend
Bicycle and Pedestrian System
Shared Use Path
Proposed Shared Use Path
Bike Lane
o se o Proposed Bike Lane
Bike Lane/Proposed Shared Use Path
Signed Shared Roadway
n re le + Signed Shared Roadway/Proposed Bike
® Shared Roadway
t=t Pedestrian Path
m Proposed Pedestrian Path
Trailheads
o Interstate 90
Schools
H+i ai-r Railroad
Other Municipalities
City of Spokane Valley
INUrban Growth Area
I I Parks
Water Bodies
Effective Date: 4/26/2011
Ordinance No.: 11-007 410
gyp° Duey
Map Location
f7
0 05 2Mile
I 1 1 I t 1
Notice: The informant", shorn or this reap is compiled Awn: r tants
sources and is sub/en ro comfort, revision. The Cigvnakes no M61:3
or guarantees abort the nrraracy or crvrtney of this rnop and
expressly disclaims hohilifyfor errors and omissions in its rani rrrs.
7b confirm accuracy contact e City of
kane Valley,
ry
Development Department Division r ofPlam Planning (509)921-1000. on rri
ProauH oldie City of Spoinne Ynaer, Community Unelopmrnt nrpara eat
GRANITE POINr'' APARTMENTS
Hal Valley Apartments LLC
12721 E. Mansfield
Spokane Valley, WA 99216
August 29, 2011
City of Spokane Valley
Att: Steve Worley, P.E.
Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Gentlemen,
According to my conversation this morning with Neil Kersten, in order to apply for TIB
funds, we, the Developers of Granite Pointe Apartments, will commit to $197,700.00 to
be used as funds for the construction of connecting Mansfield Street to Pines Road from
the east where Mansfield ends to the west to Pines Road.
Also, another eight acres to the south of the Granite Pointe Apartments is proposed to be
broken into nine commercial lots.
Yours tr
T omas D. Hamilton
Member
Hal Valley Apartments LLC
0156 - Mansfield Ave Connection
All Activity as of Apr 30 2015
Original
REVENUES; Budget
Project Prior Life
Adjusted Years 2014 2015 To Date Available
Budget j Actual Actual Actual Actual Encumbered Funds
CMAQ 0.00
TIB
Project Bid Documents
Developer Contribution 0.00
302 0.00
302 0.00
887,500.00
792,700.00
0.00
197,700.00
124,450.00
0.00
125,464.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
31,555.39
3,031.27
577,179.86
0.00
50.00
0.00
92,353.15
0.00
5,269.83
0.00
0.00
0.00
2,238.25
0.00
707,913.90
0.00
50.00
0.00
126,146.79
3,031.27
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
179,586.10
792,700.00
-50.00
197,700.00
-1,696.79
-3,031.27
Total Revenue 0.00
2,002,350.00 160,050.87 669,583.01
7,508.08 837,141.96 0.00 1,165,208.04
EXPENDITURES
Original Adjusted Prior 2014 2015 Life Available
Budget Budget Years Actual Actual To Date Encumbered Funds
Preliminary Engineering
Salaries & Wages
Overtime
Employee Benefits
FICA/401A OT
Medicare OT
L&I OT
PERS OT
Office & Operating Supplies
Engineering & Architectural
Prof. Svcs - Survey
Prof. Svcs. - Geotech
Advertising
Printing & Binding
Miscellaneous Services
COSY Permits
PE Contingency
45,000.00
15,750.00
0.00
20,000.00
20,000.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
8,800.00
11,450.00
Total Prelim. Engineering 126,000.00
Right of Way
Salaries & Wages 10,000.00
Employee Benefits 3,500.00
FICA/401A OT
Medicare OT
L&I OT
PERS OT
Professional Services 35,000.00
Prof. Svcs. Mat. Testing
Miscellaneous Services
ROW Acquisition 500,000.00
RW - Land Improvements 20,000.00
RW: Tennant Relocation 250,000.00
RW Contingency 81,500.00
Total Right of Way 900,000.00
Construction
Salaries & Wages 0.00
Employee Benefits 0.00
FICA/401A OT
Medicare OT
L&I OT
PERS OT
Prof. Svcs. Mat. Testing 0.00
Prof. Svcs. - Consulting 0.00
Advertising 0.00
Printing & Binding 0.00
Construction 0.00
CN Contingency 0.00
otal Construction 0.00
63,600.00
300.00
25,000.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22,500.00
16,000.00
3,000.00
2,000.00
18,800.00
350.00
0.00
48,154.48
286.91
20,111.29
0.00
0.00
7.47
0.00
26.87
0.00
22,323.64
10,500.00
0.00
0.00
16,287.88
350.00
0.00
27,792.22
145.26
11,680.26
0.00
0.00
3.36
0.00
0.00
246.30
0.00
0.00
1,203.82
0.00
1,325.39
0.00
0.00
8,100.21
0.00
2,779.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
558.83
0.00
0.00
84,046.91
432.17
34,571.25
0.00
0.00
10.83
0.00
26.87
246.30
22,323.64
10,500.00
1,203.82
0.00
18,172.10
350.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
722.04
0.00
0.00
-20,446.91
-132.17
-9,571.25
0.00
0.00
-10.83
0.00
-26.87
-246.30
176.36
5,500.00
1,796.18
2,000.00
-94.14
0.00
0.00
151,550.00 118,048.54 42,396.61 11,438.74 171,883.89 722.04 -21,055.93
12,250.00 4,195.65 16,496.60 8,718.24 29,410.49 0.00 -17,160.49
4,350.00 1,943.85 6,062.29 4,054.51 12,060.65 0.00 -7,710.65
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
72,000.00 29,200.63 45,202.00 3,456.68 77,859.31 5,088.84 -10,948.15
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 651.58 0.00 651.58 0.00 -651.58
515,000.00 0.00 426,095.17 22,819.00 448,914.17 0.00 66,085.83
152,000.00 0.00 46,408.76 0.00 46,408.76 0.00 105,591.24
125,000.00 5,400.00 86,220.00 0.00 91,620.00 0.00 33,380.00
19,400.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19,400.00
900,000.00 40,740.13 627,136.40 39,048.43 706,924.96 5,088.84 187,986.20
35,000.00 817.72 0.00 0.00 817.72 0.00 34,182.28
12,250.00 444.48 0.00 0.00 444.48 0.00 11,805.52
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
23,550.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23,550.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
800,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 800,000.00
80,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 80,000.00
950,800.00 1,262.20 0.00 0.00 1,262.20 0.00 949,537.80
otal Expenditures 1,026,000.00
2,002,350.00 160,050.87 669,533.01 50,487.17 880,071.05 5,810.88 1,116,468.07