2015, 06-02 Study SessionAGENDA
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Tuesday, June 2, 2015
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor
(Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting)
6:00 p.m.
DISCUSSION LEADER
SUBJECT/ACTIVITY
GOAL
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
ACTION ITEMS:
1. Mark Calhoun
2. Mayor Grafos
3. Steve Worley
4. Mayor Grafos
Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-012
Gambling Tax [public comment]
Proposed Resolution 15-004, Support of
N/S Corridor Name Change [public comment]
Bid Award, Houk-Maxwell-Sinto Street
Preservation Project [public comment]
Re -appointment of Liz Beck to Tourism
Promotion Area (TPA) Commission
[public comment]
Consider Ordinance
Consider Resolution
Motion Consideration
Motion Consideration
NON -ACTION ITEMS:
5. John Hohman
6. Cary Driskell
7. Eric Guth
8. Mayor Grafos
Comprehensive Plan Legislative Update
Site Specific Citizen -Initiated Amendment
Request Review
Initiative/Referendum Process
Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Advance Agenda
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
9. Information Only (will not be reported or discussed):
(a) Department Reports; (b) Montgomery Avenue Street Preservation Project
10. Mayor Grafos
11. Mike Jackson
ADJOURN
Council Comments
City Manager Comments
Discussion/Information
Discussion/Information
Study Session Agenda June 2, 2015 Page 1 of 1
P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Web12015Iagendapacket 2015, 06-0211tem 1 RCA Gambling Tax Rate Ord 15-012.docx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑pending legislation ❑ executive session
X
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Second Reading Ordinance #15-012 reducing the gambling tax on card
games from 10% to 6%.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC Chapter 3.25 and RCW Chapter 9.46.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council discussion on this topic has occurred on a
number of occasions leading to the April 28, 2015 Council meeting with Council approving the
advancement of Ordinance #15-012 to a second reading.
BACKGROUND: In 2003 the City of Spokane Valley adopted an ordinance which authorized
certain gaming/gambling activities and imposed related taxes, the proceeds of which are used
to partially offset law enforcement costs. Since that time a number of businesses that offer
gambling as a form of entertainment have opened and closed, and revenues have fluctuated
from year-to-year with an overall downward trend, which is conceivably due to a combination of
competition from both regional and on-line gaming establishments. There are currently 30
businesses in Spokane Valley that offer gaming in one form or another.
Gambling tax revenues for 2010 through 2014, and the 2015 Budget projection are as follows:
Actual Revenues
Type of Gambling Activity
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015 Budget
Punch Boards & Pull Tabs 71,778 64,310 64,771 70,504 64,585 71,000
Bingo & Raffles 825 1,260 1,802 638 1,227 1,200
Amusement Games 10,063 10,882 10,125 10,799 11,063 10,800
Card Games 563,477 447,778 541,696 446,497 429,376 446,000
Total
646,143 524,230 618,394 528,438 506,251 529,000
Inc. (Dec.) from previous yr. $ (80,861.18) $(121,913.00) $ 94,164.00 $ (89,956.00) $ (22,187.00)
-11.12% -18.87%
17.96% -14.55% -4.20%
At the September 23, 2014 meeting, Council heard public comment from a business owner who
operates a local gaming establishment. He stated that the gambling taxes on social card
playing in Spokane Valley are a significant expense to his business and that he believes these
taxes have been a factor in why other gaming establishments within the City have closed over
the last several years. He requested that Council consider either eliminating or reducing
gambling tax rates and noted that the City of Spokane was at that time considering reducing
their own social card game tax rate. On November 3, 2014, the City of Spokane approved an
ordinance reducing rates effective in both 2015 and 2016.
At the February 27, 2015 Winter Workshop, Council was presented with an information report
and had an opportunity to discuss the issue. At a March 30, 2015 Finance Committee meeting,
this topic was discussed and consensus was reached to bring this forward to Council with a
recommendation that the City reduce its rate on card games from 10% to 6%.
1
P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Web12015Iagendapacket 2015, 06-0211tem 1 RCA Gambling Tax Rate Ord 15-012.docx
On April 14, 2015 Council reached consensus to bring this topic forward as an action item and
on April 28, 2015 Council moved to advance Ordinance #15-012 to a second reading.
Listed below is gambling tax rate information which includes the maximum allowed by State law,
the current rates in Spokane Valley, and rates in the City of Spokane:
Type of Gambling Activity
Gambling Tax Rates
Maximum
Allowed by
State of
Washingtor
City of
Spokane
Valley
City of Spokane (3)
Through Effective Effective
12/31/2014 1/1/2015 1/1/2016
Punch Boards & Pull Tabs (1)
(1)
(1)
(2)
Bingo & Raffles
Amusement Games
Card Games
10.0%
5.0%
2.0%
20.0%
5.0%
5.0%
2.0%
10.0%
10.0%
5.0%
2.0%
10.0%
10.0%
5.0%
2.0%
8.0%
(1) Rates are applicable to gross receipts, less amounts awarded as cash or merchandise prizes.
(2) Rates are applicable to gross revenue.
(3) City of Spokane rates were changed via the adoption of their Ordinance C35153 on 11/3/2014.
10.0%
5.0%
2.0%
2.0%
Proposed Ordinance #15-012 will reduce the City's gambling tax on card games from 10% to
6% effective July 1, 2015.
The Ordinance also provides clarification of Code language, including its application to bona
fide charitable or nonprofit organizations.
OPTIONS: Options range from making no changes to the current tax rate or changing the tax
rate on card games from the existing 10% to as much as 20% or as little as 0%.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Ordinance #15-012 amending
Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.25.020 (C), gambling tax.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The 2015 Budget includes a revenue estimate of $529,000 in
gambling taxes including:
• $ 71,000 Punch Boards and Pull Tabs
• $ 1,200 Bingo and Raffles
• $ 10,800 Amusement Games
• $446,000 Card Games
Given that a 10% tax on card games is estimated to generate $446,000 in 2015:
• A 1% reduction in the tax rate would cause General Fund revenues to decrease by $44,600.
• If the City were to reduce the tax rate on card games from 10% to 6%, it would result in
annual revenues of $267,600, which is $178,400 less than is in the adopted 2015 Budget.
STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun
ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance #15-012.
2
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 15-012
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY
WASHINGTON, AMENDING SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE 3.25, GAMBLING
TAX REGULATIONS FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS
RELATING THERETO.
WHEREAS, the City adopted Ordinance 03-028 on January 28, 2003, to be effective upon the
date of incorporation. Ordinance 03-028 was later codified into Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
Chapter 3.25, Gambling Tax; and
WHEREAS, SVMC 3.25.020 states the percentage of tax to be imposed on various types of
gambling activity. SVMC 3.25.020(C) requires that operators of social card playing establishments pay
"a tax equal to 10 percent of the gross revenue from such card games;" and
WHEREAS, the level of tax imposed by the City for social card playing is now higher than that
unposed by other larger governmental entities in this region; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to have the percentage of gambling tax on social card playing at a
more competitive level than it currently is as a way to attract and maintain social card playing businesses;
and
WHEREAS, the City desires to more -clearly identify what exemptions apply for bona fide
charitable or nonprofit organizations engaging in specified gambling activities under this chapter; and
WHEREAS, the City further desires to draft minor modifications to SVMC 3.25.020 to ensure it
is consistent with RCW 9.46.110.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Intent. The City of Spokane Valley declares that the intent of this Ordinance is to
amend 3.25.020 amend the percentage of gambling tax on social card playing from 10 percent to six
percent, and to make other minor amendments to ensure consistency with RCW 9.46.110.
Section 2. Amending SVMC 3.25.020 — Imposition of Tax. SVMC 3.25.020 is hereby
amended as follows:
3.25.020 Imposition of tax.
(A) Pursuant to RCW 9.46.110, as the same now exists or may hereafter be amended, there is levied upon
all persons, associations or organizations conducting or operating in the City of Spokane Valley for any of
the activities listed below, a tax to be paid to the City of Spokane Valley, in the amount hereinafter
specified:
(1) Bingo and Raffles. 4-A tax in the amount ofequal to five percent of the gross receipts from
a bingo game or raffle, less the amount awarded as cash or merchandise prizes.
B,a) Punchboards and Pulltabs.
charitable, shall pay aA tax in an amount ofequal to five percent of the gross receipts from the
Ordinance 15-012 Amending SVMC 3.25.020, Gambling Tax
Page 1 of 3
DRAFT
operation of punchboards and pulltabs, less the amount awarded as cash or merchandise prizes,
and regardless of whether the entity is a for-profit, bona fide charitable non-profit.
€ (3) Social Card Playing._ 1. Operators shall pay aA tax equalin the amount of4e six -1-0 percent
of the gross revenue from such card games.
P(4) Amusement Games._ 4 -Amusement games authorized for operation pursuant to the
provisions of the Washington Administrative Code shall be subject to the levy of a tax in the
amount not to exceed two percent of the gross receipts from the amusement game, less the
amount awarded as prizes, and shall be equal to the amount of actual costs and expenses incurred
for enforcement of Chapter 9.46 RCW by the City of Spokane Valley.
(B) The following shall apply to bona fide charitable or nonprofit organizations pursuant to chapter 9.46
RCW:
(1) No tax shall be imposed on bingo or amusement games when such activities or combination
thereof for an organization which has no paid operating or management personnel, and has gross
receipts from bingo or amusement games, or a combination thereof, not exceeding $5,000 per
year, less the amount awarded as cash or merchandise prizes.
(2) No tax shall be imposed from raffles on the first $10,000 of gross receipts less the amount
awarded as cash or merchandise prizes conducted by a qualifying entity.
Section 3. Amending SVMC 3.25.030 — Charitable and nonprofit organizations. SVMC
3.25.030 is hereby amended as follows:
.. .... .... . . ... .
A. Bingo and amusement games conducted by a bona fide charitable or nonprofit organization (a:,
defined in RCW 9.16.0209) shall be exempt from the tax imposed by SVMC 3.25.020 when such
organization has no paid operating or management personnel and its gross rcccipts from bingo or
cash or merchandise prizes.
B. No tax may be imposed on the first $10,000 of gross rcccipts, less the amount awarded as cash
i
Section 4. Remainder of SVMC 3.25. Unchanged. The remaining provisions of chapter
3.25 SVMC are unchanged by this amendment.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence or clause of this Ordinance is
for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of
this Ordinance.
Section 6. Effective date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect July 1, 2015.
Approved this day of June, 2015.
ATTEST: Dean Grafos, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved As To Form:
Ordinance 15-012 Amending SVMC 3.25.020, Gambling Tax Page 2 of 3
DRAFT
Office of the City Attorney
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Ordinance 15-012 Amending SVMC 3.25.020, Gambling Tax Page 3 of 3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval: ❑
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 15-004, in Support of Changing the name of the
North/South Corridor, to the Thomas S. Foley Corridor.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION:
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: n/a
BACKGROUND: At the May 12, 2015 Council meeting, Mr. Kelly Cruz brought forth a proposal
that he initiated, to change the name of the North/South Corridor, to the "Thomas S. Foley
Corridor" acknowledging and honoring the late Speaker's efforts to the corridor. As noted in his
May 5, letter, Mr. Cruz has received resolutions of support from the Spokane City Council as
well as the Spokane County Commissioners, and would welcome a resolution of support from
our City. After Mr. Cruz' report, there was Council consensus to bring forth a Resolution for
consideration at the June 2 Council meeting.
OPTIONS: Approve Resolution; or take other action appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution 15-004, supporting the
name change of the North/South Corridor, to the Thomas S. Foley Corridor.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS:
STAFF CONTACT: Mike Jackson
ATTACHMENTS: Draft Resolution; Letter from Mr. Kelly Cruz, WSDOT Policy and Procedure
for renaming State Transportation Facilities, Supporting Resolution from Spokane County;
Supporting Resolution from Spokane City.
DRAFT
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
RESOLUTION NO. 15-004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON, SUPPORTING THE NAME CHANGE OF THE PORTION OF THE
TRADE ROUTE THROUGH SPOKANE, FORMALLY KNOWN AS THE
"NORTH/SOUTH CORRIDOR" TO THE "THOMAS S. FOLEY CORRIDOR;" AND
OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO.
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley City Council recognizes that the purpose of the Washington
State Transportation Commission's Policy and Procedure No. 12 is to explain the procedure of naming or
renaming state transportation facilities; and
WHEREAS, Policy and Procedure No. 12 considers as evidence of support of any request for a name
change or renaming, receipt of resolutions passed by local, publicly elected bodies in the area of the facility;
and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley City Council recognizes the contributions former U.S. House
Speaker Thomas S. Foley made for the betterment of the citizens of Washington State and the Spokane
area community; and
WHEREAS, one of the contributions former U.S. House Speaker Thomas S. Foley made was to
support and create an international trade route along the U.S. 395 corridor from the Tri -Cities north
through Spokane to the Canadian border; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane Valley City Council wishes to acknowledge and commemorate former
U.S. House Speaker Thomas S. Foley's contribution to the support and creation of this important trade
route, which will be of benefit to Washington State.
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane
County, Washington, that the City of Spokane Valley hereby supports and endorses formally renaming
that portion of the trade route through Spokane County, formally known as the North/South Corridor, to
the "Thomas S. Foley Corridor" to reflect and honor former U.S. House Speaker Thomas S. Foley's
commitment and dedication to improving the economies of the Spokane Region and Washington State.
Adopted this day of June 2015.
City of Spokane Valley
ATTEST: Dean Grafos, Mayor
Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Office of the City Attorney
Resolution 15-004 Supporting NS Corridor Name Change
Foley Resolution
May 5, 2015
Dear Spokane Valley City Council Members,
I am writing this letter to you to request a resolution supporting an initiative I am
currently sponsoring to change the North/South Corridor to the Thomas S. Foley
Corridor acknowledging and honoring the late Speaker's efforts for the corridor
including designating it as an international trade route.
For the past year 1 have been out in the community collecting signatures in
support of this initiative and I have also received resolutions of support from the
Spokane City Council and the Spokane County Commissioners, also I will be
receiving a letter of support from WSDOT Eastern region and have commitments
for letters of support from various other organizations and trade groups.
I will be presenting the initiative to the Washington State Transportation
commission on June 16th when they meet in Spokane and would welcome your
resolution of support which I will include in the packet.
Sincerely,
Kelly Cruz
WASHINGTON STATE TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION
POLICY & PROCEDURE
Policy & Procedure No.: 12
Effective Date: 04/12/1995
Revised: 2003
Revised: 02/19/2008
Revised: 01/13/2009
Transportation Commission Chair
NAMING OR RENAMING STATE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
Section 1
Statutory Authority:
RCW 47.01, Chapter 33, Laws of 2007
Section 2
What is the purpose of naming or renaming state transportation facilities?
The Commission has named state transportation facilities after an individual, a group of
individuals, entities, etc. for many years at the request of the Legislature and
communities. A naming is done in a thorough and deliberative manner to honor and
institute an enduring memory of a person or group of people who have contributed
significantly to the well-being of the state or nation and with the widespread support of
the people from the area in which the facility is located. The Commission shall avoid
acting to name or rename a facility in response to emotion or duress.
Section 3
Definitions
"Commission" means the Washington State Transportation Commission.
"Department" means the Washington State Department of Transportation.
"Facility" includes, but is not limited to:
1. state highways;
2. state highway bridges, structures, and facilities;
3. ferry terminals;
4. state rest areas; and
5. state roadside facilities, such as viewpoints.
Section 4
What types of state transportation facilities may be named or renamed by the
Transportation Commission?
The Commission may name facilities owned or operated by the State of Washington.
Section 5
Who can initiate the process to name or rename a facility?
The Legislature, the Washington State Department of Transportation, state and local
governmental entities, citizen organizations, and any person may initiate the process to
name or rename a facility.
Section 6
What is the process for initiating the naming of a state transportation facility?
To initiate the naming process without a legislative Joint Memorial being enacted, an
interested party must contact the Commission to establish their interest in seeking a
naming. The requesting party shall provide sufficient evidence to the Commission
indicating community support and acceptance of the proposal.
, Evidence of community support and acceptance may include things such as:
1. Letters of support from state and federal legislators representing area of the
facility;
2. Resolutions passed by local, publicly elected bodies in the area of the facility;
)f 3. Department support;
Supportive action by or letters from local organizations such as local chambers of
commerce or service clubs.
After receiving adequate evidence of support, the Commission shall consult with the
department on the proposal to name or rename a facility and schedule the proposal for
discussion and possible action at a regular meeting of the Commission.
Should the Legislature pass a Joint Memorial requesting the Commission name a facility,
the Commission will hold a public hearing to allow for public input prior to taking action
as soon as possible following the enactment of the joint memorial.
Section 7
What criteria are used by the Commission when it is requested to name a facility after
an individual?
If a naming request is submitted for a person who has recently died, the Commission
shall not act on the request for at least twelve months after the date of passing to allow for
a respectful period of mourning and reflection.
If two or more names are submitted for the same facility, the Commission shall consider
the possibility of naming the facility using both names, and shall seek additional input
into its decision, such as but not limited to, through consultation with community leaders
or through a public hearing in the vicinity of the facility.
The Commission shall exercise extra caution in naming or renaming a facility in honor of
a living person, giving extra consideration to the appropriateness of the timing of the
naming in the context of the individual's life and current standing in the community.
In considering whether to name a facility after an individual or a group of people, the
Commission shall evaluate such things as:
.-Whether the person or group made a significant contribution to transportation in
such areas as safety, mobility of people and goods, economic vitality and
protection of the environment.
Whether the person or group committed a significant amount of their time
working on or addressing transportation or other significant issues in the state.
Whether the person or groups efforts has had a positive long-term effect on the
lives of the people that they represented.
Section 8
What is the process the Commission uses to rename a state transportation facility that
already has a name assigned to it?
The Commission may rename a state facility already given a name, if petitioned to do so.
In addition to the process described in section 6 for naming a facility, the Commission
shall, at a minimum, consult with the descendants of the person originally honored, and
seek public comment and input in the vicinity of the facility.
Section 9
What happens after a facility is named or renamed by the Commission?
After the Commission takes final action, it shall notify the Department, the Govemor's
Office, and the legislators and elected local legislative officials from the area in which the
facility is located. The department shall design and install the appropriate signs in
NO.a015-0QC)0
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF SUPPORTING
NAMING THE 395 NORTH / SOUTH
CORRIDOR LOCATED IN THE
NORTHEAST SECTION OF SPOKANE
COUNTY AS "THOMAS S. FOLEY
CORRIDOR"
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington ("Board" or "Board of County Commissioners")
has the care of county property and the management of county funds and business; and
WHEREAS, the Washington State Transportation Commission has a Policy & Procedure
denominated as No 12 addressing the naming or renaming state transportation facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners recognizes the contributions former U.S.
House Speaker Thomas S. Foley made for the betterment of the Citizens of Washington State and
the County of Spokane; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners recognizes the efforts former U.S. House
Speaker, Thomas S. Foley made to support and create an international trade route along the U.S.
395 corridor from the Tri -Cities north through Spokane County to the Canadian border; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners recognizes the importance of finishing
that portion of the trade route formally known as the North / South Corridor thru Spokane County
for international trade and commerce; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners wishes to acknowledge and
commemorate U.S. House Speaker Thomas S. Foley's contribution to the support and creation of
the North / South Corridor trade route benefitting not only Spokane commerce, but that of
Washington State.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of
Spokane County, Washington, pursuant to the provisions of RCW 36.32.120(6), that the Board does
hereby support and endorse formally renaming that portion of the trade route through Spokane
County, formally known as the North, South Corridor, the "Thomas S. Foley Corridor" to reflect
and honor U.S. House Speaker Thomas S. Foley's commitment and dedication to improving the
economies of not only the Spokane region, but that of Washington State thru trade and
commerce.
Page 1 of 2
qc
ATTEST:
PASSED AND ADOPTED this p",i $day of , 2015.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
• a Vasquez
Interim Clerk of the Board
Page 2 of 2
TOD
Z40 0 I
LLY 0' 0 1NN, Vice -Chair
KE, Chair
V-53
AL FRENCH, ommissioner
S®E Agenda Sheet for City Council Meeting of:
Date Rec'd
3/17/2015
r-4-1 03/30/2015
yool
Clerk's File #
RES 2015-0029 1
Renews #
Submitting Dept
CITY COUNCIL
Cross Ref #
Contact Name/Phone
BEN STUCKART 625-6269
Project #
Contact E -Mail
AMCDANIEL@SPOKANECITY.ORG
Bid #
Agenda Item Type
Resolutions
Requisition #
Agenda Item Name
0320 TOM FOLEY CORRIDOR
Agenda Wording
to name the portion of the U.S. 395 through Spokane formally known as the
formally renamed the Thomas S. Foley Corridor.
A resolution supporting efforts
North Spokane Corridor be
SummarylBackground)
Foley made to support and create an international
Council wishes to acknowledge and commemorate
trade route which benefits Spokane and all of
The Spokane City Council recognizes the efforts Speaker
trade route along the U.S. 395 Corridor. the Spokane City
Speaker Foley's contribution to improving the international
Washington State.
Fiscal Impact Budget Account
Select $ #
Select $ #
Select $ ##
Select $ #
Approvals
Council Notifications
De •t Head
MCDANIEL, ADAM
Study Session
Division Director
Other
Finance
SALSTROM, JOHN
Distribution List
Legal
PICCOLO, MIKE
For the Mayor
SANDERS, THERESA
Additional Approvals
Purchasin.
ADOPTED BY SPOKANE CITY COUNCIL
SPOKANE CITY C ERK
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-0029
WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council recognizes the contributions former U.S. House
Speaker Thomas S. Foley made for the betterment of the citizens of Spokane,
Washington State, and the United States of America; and,
WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council recognizes the efforts Speaker Foley made to
support and create an international trade route along the U.S. 395 Corridor; and,
WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council recognizes the importance of finishing the North
Spokane Corridor for international trade and commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the Spokane City Council wishes to acknowledge and commemorate
Speaker Foley's contribution to improving the international trade route which benefits
Spokane and all of Washington State;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Spokane City Council hereby
requests to the United States Department of Transportation and the Washington State
Department of Transportation that the portion of the U.S. 395 trade route through
Spokane formally known as the North Spokane Corridor be formally renamed the
Thomas S. Foley Corridor to reflect and honor Speaker Foley's commitment to
international trade in Spokane and Washington State.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 30 day of March, 2015.
Attest:
Council President
Approved as to form:
Assistant ' ity Attorney
Meeting Date:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award —
Houk-Maxwell-Sinto Street Preservation Project #0220
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 17, 2014 Adopted 2015 Budget,
Resolution 14-015 which included these pavement preservation projects.
BACKGROUND: The Houk-Maxwell-Sinto Street Preservation project will place a two-inch
asphalt overlay and update pedestrian ramps and storm water facilities on the following streets:
Houk Road - Mission Avenue to Sinto Avenue
Maxwell Avenue - Pines Road and Houk Road
Sinto Avenue - Pines Road and Houk Road.
This project is funded by (1) $309,640 from Fund 311 for the street preservation work; (2)
$18,473 from Fund 303 for placement of a new sidewalk connecting health clinics to the Valley
Hospital (see attached photo); and (3) $99,234 from Fund 402 for stormwater improvements.
Public Works staff designed the project. Bids were advertised on May 8 and were opened on
Friday, May 22, 2015. A copy of the Bid Tabulation is attached.
OPTIONS: 1) Award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, 2) Not award
the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 3) take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Houk-Maxwell-Sinto Street
Preservation project, #0220 to T. LaRiviere Equipment & Excavating Inc. in the amount of
$339,647.83 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved the 2015 Budget with $2,615,050 in Fund
311 for Street Preservation projects. The overall budget for the Houk-Maxwell-Sinto project is
$427,347. There are sufficient funds to cover the cost of this project.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: Google Earth Photo with Proposed Sidewalk Limits added.
Bid Tabulations
GoogIe earth
feet
meters
30(
1.4001e !Ns /'0'1J-;LL-�� . T' w Miss)
Houk Sinto Maxwell Street Preservation Project - Bid Tabulation
Project CIP No. 0220
Bid Opening: 10:00 AM PDT, May 22, 2015
•
Silt:Wane
Engineers Estimate
T. LaRiviere Eq & Exc.
Inland Asphalt Co
Shamrock Paving
Item # Description Units Quantity
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Price
Total Cost
Sched A - Road Work
100
MOBILIZATION
LS
1
$26,000.00
$26,000.00
LS
$20,000.00
L5
$58,657.00
LS
$35,000.00
101
CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING
LS
1
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
LS
$3,500.00
LS
$8,575.00
LS
$10,000.00
102
SPCC PLAN
LS
1
$500.00
$500.00
LS
$1,000.00
L5
$500.00
L5
$1,500.00
103
EROSION CONTROL
L5
1
$500.00
$500.00
L5
$3,500.00
L5
$3,570.00
L5
$4,000.00
104
PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL
LS
1
$20,000.00
$20,000.00
LS
$8,500.00
L5
$47,500.00
LS
$30,000.00
105
PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN
HR
2880
$3.00
$8,640.00
$4.00
$11,520.00
$3.05
$8,784.00
$3.00
$8,640.00
106
SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
LF -IN
1134
$1.00
51,134.00
$0.42
5476.28
51.35
51,530.90
$0.40
5453.60
107
HMA INLAY REMOVAL
SY
1700
54.00
56,800.00
$3.00
$5,100.00
$3.20
55,440.00
58.00
513,600.00
108
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
LF
65
$12.00
5780.00
59.00
5585.00
$9.20
5598.00
522.00
51,430.00
109
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB
LF
292
512.00
$3,504.00
59.00
$2,628.00
$9.20
52,686.40
528.00
58,176.00
110
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/ DRIVEWAY APPROACH
SY
202
515.00
$3,030.00
$12.00
$2,424.00
$12.25
52,474.50
518.50
53,737.00
111
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 2 IN. DEPTH
SY
55
520.00
$1,100.00
$55.00
$3,025.00
549.50
$2,722.50
$12.00
5660.00
112
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 41N. DEPTH
SY
1902
$20.00
538,040.00
$9.00
517,118.00
$11.20
521,302.40
$8.00
515,216.00
113
PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, 2IN. DEPTH
SY
285
$5.00
51,425.00
$12.00
53,420.00
$57.00
516,245.00
$60.00
517,100.00
114
PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, 1/4 IN. DEPTH
SY
4157
51.50
56,235.50
51.75
$7,274.75
$4.20
$17,459.40
$5.00
520,785.00
115
PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, TAPER GRIND
SY
2655
$5.00
$13,275.00
51.00
52,655.00
54.40
511,682.00
$6.00
515,930.00
116
HMA CL. 1/2" PG 64-28 0.33 FT. DEPTH
SY
1700
517.00
$28,900.00
523.00
539,100.00
523.00
539,100.00
524.00
$40,800.00
117
HMA CL. 1/2" PG 64-28
TON
635
580.00
550,800.00
595.00
560,325.00
595.00
560,325.00
590.00
557,150.00
118
HMA CL. 1/2" PG 64-28 0.17 FT. DEPTH, PATCH
SY
285
516.00
54,560.00
$22.00
$6,270.00
521.60
56,156.00
$38.00
$10,830.00
119
JOINT ADHESIVE
LF
2476
51.00
$2,476.00
51.00
52,476.00
51.00
52,476.00
51.25
53,095.00
120
JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT
CALC
1
CALC
$1.00
CALC
$1.00
CALC
$1.00
CALC
$1.00
121
COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT
CALC
1
CALC
51.00
CALC
$1.00
CALC
$1.00
CALC
$1.00
122
CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER
LF
65
$25.00
51,625.00
$24.00
51,560.00
$17.30
51,124.50
522.00
51,430.00
123
CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB
LF
292
520.00
55,840.00
$20.00
55,840.00
514.90
$4,350.80
517.60
$5,139.20
124
CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SY
55
$35.00
51,925.00
528.00
51,540.00
$34.40
$1,892.00
$27.50
51,512.50
125
CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLELA
EACH
5
51,000.00
55,000.00
$1,000.00
$5,000.00
5730.00
$3,650.00
51,800.00
$9,000.00
126
CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM SDA
EACH
3
51,000.00
$3,000.00
5900.00
52,700.00
5859.00
52,577.00
51,600.00
54,800.00
127
CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL B
EACH
4
51,200.00
54,800.00
$900.00
53,600.00
$890.00
53,560.00
51,700.00
56,800.00
128
CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB
LF
224
515.00
53,360.00
$20.00
54,480.00
$9.00
$2,016.00
520.00
54,480.00
129
ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE
EACH
4
5600.00
$2,400.00
$550.00
$2,200.00
5560.00
52,240.00
$600.00
$2,400.00
130
ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE
EACH
9
$250.00
$2,250.00
$300.00
52,700.00
5310.00
52,790.00
5300.00
52,700.00
131
SOD INSTALLATION
SY
41
$50.00
$2,050.00
$22.00
5902.00
$21.30
$873.30
522.00
5902.00
132
TOPSOIL, TYPE B
SY
41
$50.00
$2,050.00
$12.00
$492.00
510.70
$438.70
$11.00
5451.00
133
BARK MULCH
SY
31
550.00
$1,550.00
512.00
$372.00
$10.00
$310.00
510.50
5325.50
134
RIVER ROCK
SY
3
$50.00
$150.00
560.00
$180.00
$53.00
$159.00
$55.00
5165.00
135
IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION
EACH
13
5500.00
56,500.00
5250.00
53,250.00
5215.00
$2,795.00
$220.00
52,860.00
136
MAIL DROP RELOCATION
EACH
2
5200.00
5400.00
$250.00
5500.00
$215.00
5430.00
$250.00
$500.00
137
PLASTIC STOP LINE
LF
60
51.50
590.00
518.00
51,080.00
515.30
5918.00
520.00
$1,200.00
Total Schedule A -
5261,691.50
$237,295.03
5347,910.40
$342,769.80
TOTAL (Ali; schedules)
$361,231.50. ( $339,647.83
45,445.00
467,374.30
Bid Proposal Checklist
Proposal form
Contractor's Administrative Information
Bidder Qualification Statement
Bid Deposit Form
Bid Deposit Surety Form
Representations and Certifications
x
x
X
X
Engineers Estimate
T. LaRiviere Eq & Exc.
Inland Asphalt Co
Shamrock Paving
Units Quantity
Unit Price Total Cost
Unit Price Total Cost
Unit Price Total Cost
Unit Price Total Cost
Sched 6 -Stormwater Work
200
TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM
LS
1
5500.00
5500.00
1.5
51,500.00
LS
$1,530.00
LS
$600.00
201
SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT
LF -IN
740
51.00
5740.00
$0.42
5310.80
51.35
5999.00
50.40
5296.00
202
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB
LF -IN
161
512.00
51,932.00
59.00
51,449.00
$9.20
$1,481.20
515.00
52,415.00
203
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK / DRIVEWAY APPROACH
SY
81
515.00
$1,215.00
$15.00
51,215.00
512.20
598820
$20.00
51,620.00
204
STORMWATER PATCH REMOVAL
SY
377
54.00
51,508.00
$5.00
51,885.00
56.20
52,337.40
$23.00
58,671.00
205
ABANDON EXISTING DRYWELL
EACH
2
51,000.00
$2,000.00
545000
$900.00
5459.00
5918.00
5800.00
51,600.00
206
REMOVE INLET
EACH8
$250.00
52,000.00
$300.00
$2,400.00
5305.00
52,440.00
5300.00
52,400.00
207
REMOVE CURB INLET TYPE 2
EACH2
5500.00
51,000.00
5400.00
5800.00
5360.00
5720.00
5250.00
5500.00
208
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 2 IN. DEPTH
SY
20
520.00
5400.00
585.00
$1,700.00
596.00
51,920.00
$12.00
$240.00
209
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4 IN. DEPTH
SY
458
$20.00
59,160.00
$9.00
54,122.00
511.50
55,267.00
$24.00
510,992.00
210
HMA CL. 1/2" PG 64-28 0.33 FT. DEPTH, PATCH
SY
377
517.00
55,409.00
546.00
$17,342.00
546.00
517,342.00
538.00
514,326.00
211
JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT
CALC
1
CALC
51.00
CALC
51.00
CALC
51.00
CALC
51.00
212
COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT
CALC
1
CALC
51.00
CALC
51.00
CALC
$1.00
CALC
$1.00
213
DUCTILE IRON STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN. DIA.
LF
178
580.00
514,240.00
548.00
$8,544.00
$56.00
$9,968.00
558.00
510,324.00
214
CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRYWELL
EACH
11
5680.00
56,600.00
5300.00
53,300.00
$305.00
$3,355.00
$600.00
56,600.00
215
PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE A WITH SOLID COVER
EACH
1
53,000.00
$3,000.00
$2,200.00
$2,200.00
$2,245.00
$2,245.00
$3,100.00
53,100.00
216
CATCH 86515 TYPE 1
EACH
11
51,500.00
$16,500.00
51,800.00
$19,800.00
51,835.00
$20,185.00
$1,900.00
$20,900.00
217
CURB INLET TYPE 2
EACH
2
$2,000.00
54,000.00
$1,700.00
$3,400.00
$865.00
$1,730.00
$1,100.00
52,200.00
218
TYPE 4 FRAME AND SOLID COVER
EACH
7
$500.00
53,500.00
$600.00
$4,200.00
5612.00
54,284.00
$800.00
$5,600.00
219
SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR
EACH
11
5500.00
55,500.00
5225.00
$2,475.00
5306.00
$3,366.00
$875.00
59,625.00
220
CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB
LE
161
$20.00
$3,220.00
520.00
$3,220.00
51480
$2,382.80
$18.40
$2,962.40
221
CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SY
62
$35.00
52,170.00
$28.00
$1,736.00
$34.35
$2,129.70
575.00
54,650.00
222
CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH
SY
13
$50.00
$650.00
$55.00
5715.00
559.00
5767.00
557.08
5741.00
223
CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A
EACH
1
51,000.00
51,000.00
51,000.00
$1,000.00
$730.00
5730.00
51,800.00
51,800,00
224
SOD INSTALLATION
SY
19
550.00
5950.00
530.00
5570.00
526.60
5505.40
$27.50
5522.50
225
TOPSOIL, TYPE B
50
19
550.00
5950.00
516.00
$304.00
$15.00
$285.00
$15.40
$292.60
226
IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION
EACH4
$500.00
52,000.00
5300.00
$1,200.00
$240.00
5960.00
5250.00
51,000.00
Total Schedule 8 -
591,146.00
586,289.80
$88,83720
5113,979.50
Engineer Estimate
A
9
C
Units Quantity
Unit Price Total Cost
Unit Price Total Cost
Unit Price
Total Cost
Unit Price Total Cost
Schedule C <- Other Work
300
CLEARING AND GRUBBING
LS
1
51,000.00
$1,000.00
LS
53,500.00
LS
$2,660.00
15
$3,500.00
301
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB
LF
37
512.00
$444.00
$9.00
5333.00
510.00
5370.00
527.00
$999.00
302
REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK / DRIVEWAY APPROACH
5Y
9
515.00
$135.00
515.00
5135.00
513.00
$117.00
$29.00
5261.00
303
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 2 IN. DEPTH
SY
6
520.00
$120.00
$200.00
$1,200.00
$185.00
$1,110.00
$46.00
5276.00
304
CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE, 4 IN. DEPTH
SY
51
520.00
51,020.00
555.00
52,805.00
54.60
5234.60
523.00
51,173.00
305
CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB
LF
37
520.00
$740.00
520.00
$740.00
$14.80
$547.60
518.00
5666.00
306
CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK
51'
40
$35.00
51,400.00
$66.00
$2,640.00
534.35
51,374.00
528.00
51,120.00
307
CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM SDA
EACH
1
51,000.00
51,000.00
51,500.00
51,500.00
5860.00
5860.00
5700.00
$700.00
308
CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB
LF
19
515.00
$285.00
$20.00
5380.00
$9.00
$171.00
525.00
$475.00
309
ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE
EACH1
$600.00
5600.00
5550.00
5550.00
5560.00
$560.00
$600.00
5600.00
310
SOD INSTALLATION
SY
15
550.00
$750.00
528.00
5420.00
$26.60
$399.00
530.00
$450.00
311
TOPSOIL, TYPE B
50
15
550.00
5750.00
524.00
5350.00
$14.90
$223.50
520.00
$300.00
312
BARK MULCH
SY
3
550.00
5150.00
5500.00
51,500.00
523.40
570.20
535.00
5105.00
Total Schedule C -$8,394.00
$16,063,00
$8,696.90
$10,625.00
TOTAL (Ali; schedules)
$361,231.50. ( $339,647.83
45,445.00
467,374.30
Bid Proposal Checklist
Proposal form
Contractor's Administrative Information
Bidder Qualification Statement
Bid Deposit Form
Bid Deposit Surety Form
Representations and Certifications
x
x
X
X
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: nconsent n old business ® new business n public hearing
n information n admin. report n pending legislation n executive session
AGENDA TITLE: Motion Consideration: Reappointment of Liz Beck to the Tourism Promotion
Area Commission
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.101.040(2) and "Interlocal Cooperation Act Agreement for
Establishment of Spokane County Tourism Promotion Area" as well as Amendment 1 and 2.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On February 10, 2004, Council approved the above-
mentioned Interlocal agreement. Amendment No. 1 to that Interlocal, which approved removal of the
December 31, 2008 sunset clause, was approved by Council December 11, 2007. Amendment No. 2
approved by Council August 25, 2009, amended the Special Assessments on operators of Lodging
Businesses changing levy rates in Zone A, B, and C to $2.00 per room per day.
BACKGROUND: The above -referenced interlocal established a `Tourism Promotion Area' which
includes the unincorporated area of Spokane County and the entire area within the corporate limits of
Spokane and Spokane Valley. That Agreement also establishes the Spokane Hotel and Motel
Commission, the purpose of which is to advise the Board of County Commissioners on the expenditures
of Special Assessment revenues by the Spokane County Tourism Promotion Area to fund tourism
promotion in Spokane County. Members of this Commission are selected by the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, Spokane City Council, and Spokane Valley Council from a list of
nominees prepared by the Spokane Hotel and Motel Association. All nominees must be operators or
lodging businesses or employed by the operator of such a lodging business. Ex -officio members may
participate in meeting discussions but shall not have voting rights.
The Board of County Commissioners shall appoint two members and one ex -officio member to represent
the County; Spokane City shall appoint four members and one ex -officio member; and Spokane Valley
Council shall appoint two members and one ex -officio member. Member's terms are for three years.
Ms. Sander's last appointment expired the end of May, 2015. Mayor Grafos recommends the re-
appointment of Liz Beck to the TPA for a three-year term.
OPTIONS: Move to confirm the appointment; do not confirm the appointment; or take other action
deemed appropriate.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Liz Beck to
the Tourism Promotion Area Commission for a three-year term from June 1, 2015 through May 31, 2018
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: none
COUNCIL/STAFF CONTACT: Mayor Grafos, Chris Bainbridge
ATTACHMENTS: Application for Commission Appointment; Letter of recommendation from the
Spokane Hotel/Motel Association
Application Form for
Committees/Boards/Commissions
Return Completed form to City Clerk at
City Hall, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
509-720-5102 phone; 509-688-0194 fax
POSITION APPLYING FOR c' t n -e- 14757--e-1 (Y1,6r e / C/ 3I a fl M!Y) /55 i 571€ r
Applicant's name (please print): L-1 G 2 Gk .
Applicant's Residence Address: y 81 1 O.ZS-Z c tc1 /412.e. A35kc✓,-E_ q q 9..17W
Street City .Zip Code
Applicant's Mailing Address (if different from Residence address): cl a t7 /4. _c'?, n.e £d vkG.n.+t (/D.-!
Street BUJ City Zip Cie
Applicant's Email: I°i 2-' e C k ✓p i/, c. v M
Home Phone: 5b4 - 3 al-/ - q a / a Work Phone: Sb q - SW Cell Phone: .57-)q - q f - 64,90
Length of time continuously lived within Spokane Valley City Limits: A///4
NOTE: You must be a resident of the City of Spokane Valley to participate on most boards, committees and commissions.
Gender: Female Mr Male (M U.S. Citizen? y_ S Wa. State Registered voter? Ye 5
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY:
Present or last employer: L k 61 -ac J Cla
Dates of Employment: e a i)`7 -
Position Held: 1/A...e Po -e a;
ecccncn�-
Address: 0.24.%/4,N. /1 -116..c, -""e- 2-d- nAO 1�n.�.r.A_ t% -I
Phone: 5t - 9.2 V- L-1
Previous Employer: M D /-4-04.40 //a 11 ( !I h '
Position Held: Q-c-n.tn w! Dates of Employment: / q S 8 -
Address: aaa D A/. Y.} -r, f%U I
Phone: 7 1 - 94? - e -i y 5?
a i7G`i
54--/4
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND:
High School: c ,1-rtiyl l.2 1-frr'r� i
City/State Address 4ci Sk�e ,.., 1.574
College/University: od FCC-
City/State
CC-
City/State Address:
Diploma: Yes No M
Degree Earned: N / r+
College/University: Degree Earned: N
City/State Address: 1.41-74
COMMUNITY RELATED ACTIVITIES, PAST & PRESENT: (attach additional sheets if necessary) At sr e ha. i2
r ern-, g`: S, `rT-, gi 1 D 7-Pe,Z. f P t h54 -x.. I -.c. 1
/-4—s5 oc ,4Qa?' �r1 " i a a -C, O 57 — 01(, I 0 .. `'" `"1<e,....e. Pard, l (.ems i d$;1 n� r8 Sc r
c•9m.r„ Jct c2, 00 3 - a Gc>`% .
VSLUNTEER EXPERIENCES, PAST & PRESENT:
,,ii di ncli7 -Y, c -P / P S' J 775:1-3 d' ° e4.4._ fi, w U v, t,c.. ,.e..
/-/-olze./ 671. &--1--.4.4 S :s oe l cc. a -n A. DO'rl o� l 'l . OM �--m %J ' -s -,., 47rr, .)-), ..Lrz.,
�" p
4 v ,..,c aery, vt.c.4.4-i p-ri 4' V '1.-1-612__, (lu.r...c lQc.3 - I q? qi
SPECIAL SKILLS/INTERESTS:
64'50..r+ i-241-Hso s 4-- -11'n t.t_ cr,a n0/fl A.v,.*..# t ps..o-F-.¢-e-h`an (-54--. 1 -f-. '.._Sfxc 4
rr- n r tea-oci c. 11-eQ..P..c_.c.�f7` an i` nc. I u. e ,..6y.. y c.ki arm 4h c� •1••,.�DC; bi..0 0 .
PAST OR PRESENT MEMBER OF THE FOLLOWING PROFESSIONAL, CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS OR
GOVERNMENT BOARDS, COMMITTEES, OR COMMISSIONS:
f,•
57-n,L. I -j :c,r(G 7-:0 1,4-- t= (4)-7..,7-1 3 - o
ommittee Name
Committee Name
Com, T
CD3 -
773!- c -a-) r n, i 55 I\Crn-e c a D1)1-1 - C u-0.
Committee Name
City/State
Pk.
City/State
44574
City/State U
What do you feel you can contribute to the community that may not be evident from information already furnished?
Ot,.-, ctr--F-, ✓..e_ nrwt_. ,�, i.� �+ a f ..�._. ear, r,n. o.t., , 1 � At I a.,47' O 1
A^rGi,% f.4/ /?7 rA-c, p ,err,,, Olf err,
Why do you feel you are qualified to act as a member of the Board, Committee or Commission for which you are
applying?
A. .. Dt.t.Q. c• a y.ea r+s o -f h trs..14 11-e. t,' 4,,a.�, �rrNar-- i-
k2Sc.pj1'�C.e..► e_� �-r� c,.rn 12-c._c+
Would your appointment to this position create a conflict of interest or an appearance of a conflict of interest? / v .
T it IS
Today's Date
April 6, 2015
To Whom it May Concern:
RECE
WED
APR 3 0 2015
City of Spokane Valley
City Clerk
Sp-o-ka,we f crte�/
Mote( /-� SSa c�a t�c�w
It is recommended by the Spokane Hotel Motel Association that Liz Beck be renewed
as a Spokane Hotel and Motel Commissioner representing The City of Spokane Valley
for an additional term of 3 years.
The Spokane Hotel and Motel Commission advises the Board of County Commission of
Spokane County on the expenditure of Special Assessment revenues by the Spokane
County Touris romdt on Area to fund tourism promotion in Spokane County.
By: 161:146-J Date: 4-6-15
Representing the Spokane Hotel Motel Association
Its: Executive Director
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin.report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan Legislative Update — Site Specific Citizen -Initiated
Amendment Request Review
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: Per RCW 36.70A.130(1), every county and city in the state is required to
conduct an update of its comprehensive plan and development regulations every 8 years. The
City of Spokane Valley's update is due no later than June 30, 2017.
RCW 36.70A.140 of the Washington GMA requires that each city "establish and broadly
disseminate to the public a public participation program identifying procedures providing for
early and continuous public participation in the development and amendment" of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The City approved a Public Participation Plan on January 6, 2015. The
CAR (Citizen Amendment Request) application process is a method for citizens, neighborhood
organizations, or other interested parties to propose changes to the Comprehensive Plan, land
use map, zoning map, or development regulations. CAR applications were received through
March 31, 2015.
Staff reviewed the applications and first compared them to the focus areas identified in the
comprehensive plan work program and then to the public input themes developed at the public
meetings. The information was presented to the Planning Commission at a Study Session on
April 23, and discussed further at a public hearing on May 14th where considerable testimony
was provided. On May 18th the Planning Commission deliberated on the Map Amendments
only and considered whether each proposal should be 1) included in the Comprehensive Plan
Update for further analysis, 2) deferred to a future annual Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Cycle and analyzed at that time, or 3) excluded from further analysis in conjunction with the
Comprehensive Plan Update.
The table below identifies the Planning Commission recommendation associated with each of
the following CAR applications:
CAR Application #
Include
application for
further review
Defer
application to
future Comp
Plan
Amendment
Exclude
application
from further
review
No
recommendation
CAR -2015-0001
X
CAR -2015-0002
X
CAR -2015-0003
X
CAR -2015-0004-0009
X
CAR -2015-0010-0011
X
CAR -2015-00012
X
CAR -2015-0013
X
CAR -2015-0014-0015
X
CAR -2015-0016
X
CAR -2015-0017
X
CAR -2015-0019
X — Withdrawn by
Applicant
CAR -2015-0020
X
The Planning Commission is scheduled to conduct a public hearing on the text and overlay
zone amendments on June 8. The Planning Commission recommendation will be forwarded to
the Council for their consideration shortly thereafter. Staff will be present to discuss the CAR
applications.
OPTIONS: N/A
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: None
STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Director; and Lori Barlow, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS: Included in the separate 2015 Comprehensive Plan Legislative Update
Yellow Binder
City Council
Citizen -Initiated Amendment Requests
(CARS}
Administrative Report
June2,2015
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Discussion Points
Comp Plan Update - Overview
® CAR Application Review Process and Next Steps
o CAR Application Review
�.�Valley.
Update Process - Began Jan. 20! 5
Data gathering
•
Implement the
Public Participation
Program to ensure
continuous
participation
Sjiiikane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Review the vision
for the
development of the
community
consistent with the
vision
We are here
Amend the Zoning
Code and other
development
regulations as
needed to ensure
consistency with
updated
Comprehensive Plan
Review and Update Process
ESTABLISH PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
PROGRAM
Ensures the public is aware of the
process
Knows how they can participate
Public Meetings — Develop Focus
Themes
CAR Applications
WEB Page
Spokane
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
REVIEW PLANS AND REGULATIONS
® Evaluate Comprehensive Plan and
Development Regulations for
Consistency with GMA
Focus Themes Identified by City
Mineral Resource Lands
Multi -family Zones
Office Zones
Industrial Lands
Community Vision Report
Public Input Themes
Stibkane
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
COMMUNITY VISION REPORT
APRIL 2015
Spokane
Valley.
Community ofOpportunity
Themes were developed
and adjusted based on input
from the public.
Community
Character
Economic
Opportunity
Transportation
CAR Application Review
Overview of Review Process and Next Steps
Spo iane
alley.
CAR Applications Received
oA total of 26 applications were received
19 Map amendment requests
5 Text amendment requests
2 Overlay zone request (map and text
amendment)
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
t__
Spahr
r r1 -
LFII_
CO. of
M axoad
1
410
IL
■
mom-- 11gdpromm11111111 •
,rt
1
•ii
GAR 155-901
ago HDR
CAR 15-0013
Oto HDR
Overlay Locations
R 150017
a to NC
oilliMMON 11.1
AR 15-0012
HDR to Chill
CAR App Ii0ation
Number
Destii ption of
Reque5l
1 CAR 15-0418
,...±.)
Develop a Minei0I Resource
Lana De0ig natio n Over lay
CAR 15-0025
Develop Man uractured
Home Park inner IBy
=NM
_■1
IlMitalillDR
r
CAR 15-003
DA to HDR
171
ia�ne�ie 1
M OR Io HDR
AR 15
�.. ■
-010 - 0011 =� CAR 15-008 -409
to H DR 1—_ _ hiDR to CN ll d NC
manIALIIIIKAUM
CAR 15-044 -007
0 toMll or NC
woripiwmk E
pir
1,0,4
I 'I
•
•=. \NuNatt Nib
mr.
SCC141,---1 I
hihr
ilmurpiwa
— do
1
R
1
Tr
CAR 15-0010
MDR to HDR
Ill
. I ,
kr
Legend
▪ CAR rm.e
Camprellen sive Plan
7+n
a r, oral al OaDIR
1-.91-11Dw-on Reside -45.1 9€R1
cc. GP I
- Mrglx.no dlComm.rml prcl
11111 r... dSol
▪ --
- Ilip1Y Ari..Id d-0
CAR Review Process
Staff
Review
•Review for
criteria
•Prepare Staff
Memo
April 2015
Spokane
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
Planning
Commission
•Review Staff
Memo
•Forward a
Recommendation
to City Council
May 2015
City
Council
•Review Planning
Commission
Recommendation
•Make final
decision on what
is included in
update scope
June 2015
Planning
Commission
Review Timeline
•Review Staff
Memo
Forward a
Recommendation
to City Council
Spokane
jValley
(Toni arup ty of Oppo.7uia ty
Study Session Map and Text/Overlay
CARs - April 23, 2015
PH/Deliberations Map CARs
May 14, 2015 and May 18, 2015
PH/Deliberations Text/Overlay CARs
June 8, 2015
Planning Commission
Options
Planning
Commission
•Review Staff
Memo
Forward a
Recommendation
to City Council
Spokane`
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
Include in Comp Plan
Update Analysis
Defer to Future Update
Do Not Include in Comp
Plan Update Analysis
If a CAR is included in the
Update Process for analysis
does that mean it's approve
Data gathering
Spokane�
jValley
C011111runrn' of Oppo.7uia ty
Implement the Public
Participation
Program to ensure
continuous
participation
Review the vision for
the development of
the community
Develop goals,
policies, and
objectives consistent
with the vision
NO
Amend the Zoning
Code and other
development
regulations as
needed to ensure
consistency with
updated
Comprehensive Plan
1
Waiting for
analysis -
Requests will be
considered as part
of the
comprehensive
land use analysis
completed by
consultants.
Revisited at Draft
Plan Review
Stage.
CAR Map Applications Review
Spokane
alley.
2015-0001
APPLICANT:
Edward Payne
ADDRESS:
1618 N. Sargent Rd.
REQUEST:
Change Comp Plan Map
designation from 0 to
VHDR and Rezone from
AGO to MF -2
Sifoliane
Valley
- v --- :,,,,,, ----->-_,..---""
''''' _ - - - - - . . . -,A . . - - - -___ ,------------'"A . - - -_ .".
. . . . - - - - - - - "...2 : :
v;# , _. . . . , . . . .„... . e . . _ _r , _ _ .. ....„,, , , _ , ",-_. Stud Area
,
,..,,,,,,,,,..---J
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
a
0
0
L.r)
N
DC
V
EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
}•A
ag70
V. ' -• ,:' . ' 5 , -tr
�' Study Area,
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Looking East
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
CD PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
co ® Include proposal for further
review
Vote: 4 TO 2
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
o DISCUSSION:
None
N APPLICANT:
0 Howard Herman
O
O
�f1
O
ADDRESS:
115 and 117 N.
McDonald Rd.
REQUEST:
Change Comp Plan Map
designation from LDR
U to CMU and Rezone
from R-3 to CMU
Valley
Study Area
...:.....::.
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
1
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
Valley.
Community of Opportuni ty
co
O
co
i11
c -I
O
N
U
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
No Recommendation
Note: The motion was made
to
"Include the proposal for
further review. "
Vote: 3 TO 3
Spokane
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
o DISCUSSION:
A motion must have a
majority vote to pass. The
vote was a tie, and the
motion failed
M APPLICANT: 7
0 Triple Creek Investments
O
ADDRESS:
16608 E. Broadway Ave.
REQUEST:
Change Comp Plan Map
designation from LDR to
HDR and Rezone from R-
3 to MF -2
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
�5tudy Area
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
Valley. EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Looking South
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
0 PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
co c Include proposal for further
review o DISCUSSION:
Vote: 6 to 0 Appropriate based on
development
Spokane`
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
o1
ID *APPLICANT:
Stephen Ford
*ADDRESS:
226 and 302 S. Sullivan and
adj. vacant lot; 15411 and
15423 E. 4th; and 15410 E.
2nd
REQUEST:
CD
Change Comp Plan Map
designation from 0 or MDR
to CMU or NC and Rezone
from O or MF -1 to CMU or
�,TM�NC
Spokane
Valley.
45231.1110
15410 E
2ND AVE
-4523} iiD
SCitLfYkfJ RD
45231:=1.262
45231.1358
15411 E
4 T?i AVE
dry
523
154'23'
TNf VE
411
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
0
0
1
0
0
0
Lin
0
r4
1
U
1106
2S
S ULL IVAN RD
Sfilikane
Valley® EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
45231.1110
15410 E
2ND AVE
• „4 43rj.�9
�t?2
$[!L•L�IV� 1i�ft m
4523149
2 5
S[7U iVA'Nrft
1
Study Area
45231.7358
75477E 523��3
5423
4TH AVE Orli
Fourth Ave
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Looking NW
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
CAR -2015-0004-9
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Defer proposal to future
Comprehensive Plan
Amendment
Vote: 5 to 1
Spokane`
j Valley.
Coinmunrtp of Opportunim
DISCUSSION:
Commercial uses are
encroaching into
neighborhoods on east side of
request;
Area currently transitioning
from residential
Area will fill between Sprague
and 4th over time, and
continue south;
T-1
T-1 o APPLICANT:
0 Dennis Crapo
0 o ADDRESS:
p 13215 and 13313 E. 4th
� Ave.
o REQUEST:
Change Comp Plan Map
designation from MDR to
HDR and Rezone from
MF -1 to MF -2
0
N
V
"okan e��
Valley.
Community of Opportunity
1
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
cp
1
0
0
1
0
N
DC
e, okan�`"'
Valley® EXISTING LAND USE
I..J 1
Bill
Study Area I
514,
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
1
1
' PLANNING COMMISSION
O�
O�
® No Recommendation o
1 -fl Note: The motion was made
� to "Defer the proposal to
N future annual amendment."
1
pC Vote: 3 TO 3
V
Spokane~
jVa11eJ'.
Community of Opportunim
RECOMMENDATION
DISCUSSION:
Apartments currently located in
area
Property already Medium
Density Residential
Fewer Single Family Homes
built
Multifamily Vacancy Rate @
15%
Public comment opposed
N APPLICANT:
9t—i O'Reilly Enterprises
p ADDRESS:
Lt-) Vacant Lot
REQUEST:
O
N Change Comp Plan Map
designation from HDR
to CMU and Rezone
fromMF-2toCMU
Sioliane
Valley
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
Siiikane
Valley.
EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
2015-0012
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Include proposal for
further review
Vote: 6 to 0
Spokane`
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
® DISCUSSION:
Property to the East
has same owner
(O'Reilly Auto Part's)
M
9t—i Jerry and Angela Bishop
O
O
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
8021 E. Broadway Ave.
REQUEST:
Change Comp Plan Map
designation from 0 to
HDR and Rezone from
OtoMF-2
Sioliane
Valley
Community of Opportunity
11,edwey
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
Sficiliai°#;\'`
Valley. EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
Valley.
Community of Opportuni ty
r'r) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
co ® Include proposal for further
review
Vote: 6 TO 0
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
o DISCUSSION:
None
Lli
� o APPLICANT:
pBrian Chavez and David
Rim and Geraldine King
o ADDRESS:
p 15316 and 15324 E.
Valleyway Ave.
o REQUEST:
CD Change Comp Plan Map
designation from LDR to
cC C and Rezone from R-4 to
V �
c
"okan e��
Valley.
Community ofOpportunity
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
0
0
1
1
rsi0
1
str
0
Skeane 'I`
Valley.
EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
L'd kyxey
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
2015-0014-15
CC
U
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Include proposal for
further review
Vote: 4 TD 1
Spokane
j Valley®
Commissioner Scott recused
herself due to conflict of
interest
Community of Opportunim
DISCUSSION:
Concurrency requirements
Neighborhood Traffic
Concerns
Infrastructure
Improvements at time of
development
()APPLICANT:
ILD Verona Southern
6' ADDRESS:
p Southern Manufactured
Home Park (intersection
� of Barker and Laberry)
p REQUEST:
N Change Comp Plan Map
designation from MDR to
< HDR and Rezone from
V
MF -1 to MF -2
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community ofOpportunity
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
r -I
0
0
d
N
DC
V
Spokane
Valley. EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportunity
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Community of Opportuni ty
rl
co c Defer proposal to future
Comprehensive Plan
rl Amendment
N Vote: 5 TO 0
Note: Commissioner Graham
recused herself due to a
conflict of interest
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDATION
CC
U
S kikan
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
DISCUSSION:
The primary concern is
that Barker Road is not
adequately improved to
handle traffic associated
with multi -family
development.
APPLICANT: -- _ - , - --,., p-----.„ ", - - -, - -, , - -..„ , - -- -, „ - - -,,,,,,----,„ . . . . .- - -,,,,,,,,,-,______- - -,,,",„ - - - -__._ , , ____.---,,,,,,,,..---, , ,..,,,, , , , , _ , , , , , . . , , - - -, , _ „..., ,... , , , , . ... - - -,,_,,,,,,_,,,, -, , , , _ , , , " ,_. , , . . , , . . ., -- -,,,,,,,,, -, , ___ , , , , , , , ,..„ , , „ . , --,_,,,-
.—i McFreeze Corporation-,
p .,4„ _,-'-',-,--.'„----.1,
Ln 807 N. Argonne Ave. ''''-0
ADDRESS: 1,-,- Ffr- ----- _,..,.,___,
--..
o REQUEST:
Ni Change Comp Plan Map
Q .---.,--„----- --„,„,,,--,,,_,,,,,,,,„
designation from O to'------'-------"'
V NC and Rezone from
AGO- -. . ..-„-- • -__ - - --_,.._:----„, --.. - - -.> - --_ _ - -_,.=-'----- --.,.
Sioliane
to NC - - --"' ''''
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
Valley. EXISTING LAND USE
Community of opportunity
CURRENT ZONING
,
____
---r---,,----,________,,,,,„,____,„,--_____,,,,,,____,,_„-----
„,,,''-''''—
_.d,,„:,,.,„,„>,,.,. ,'-
,,_,,,,,,-
-„,,,,,,-_,„,„,„ _,,
--,
____,------„,--,..-------'.4
.sturrea'''
,,.,_------------,._,..,__-------/--T,__,..„
-_-----;----
.,,,,,,,.,,,,,„,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
5:-7,,,,,,,„,.,,,,,,,,,,,„
/1%fif/
_._,,,-"---;,-,
-•----- -_,,,-----_
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Community of Opportunity
Lookin. NE
Surrounding properties
STARBUCit
COFFEE
Sfilikane
Valley.
Community of Opportuni ty
rl
� Include proposal for further review
Vote: 5 TO 1
r -I
0
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N
CC
U
S kikan
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
DISCUSSION:
Consistent with focus
themes identified by Staff
Office zone too restrictive
for development
consistent with existing
development across
Broadway
cn APPLICANT:
T-1 Reginald Martin
ADDRESS:
13520 E. Nora Ave.
T-1 REQUEST:
N Change Cri dap
CC cI:.�iT� at!oil from 0 to C
aila Rezone from 0 to C
*lime`�
Valley®
Cornrnunity of Opportunity
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
cr)0rJ
cC
Stiolane
Walley®
EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportuni ty
199
90
90
w,941
CURRENT ZONING
Nimmummimmuninemill
o APPLICANT:
C) Dwight Humee a \N
Dwight
" 6- ADDRESS:
p 12717, 12725, 12803,
L.r) 12815, 12823 and 12903
� 4th Ave.
p REQUEST:
N Change Comp Plan Map
designation from MDR to
HDR and Rezone from
MF -1 to MF -2
Sficiliane
�.�Valley.
Community ofOpportunity
r
CURRENT COMP PLAN DESIGNATION
Spokane`
Valley. EXISTING LAND USE
Community of Opportuni ty
CURRENT ZONING
Photos of proposal
Looking NE
Sfibliane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
Surrounding properties
Sfilikane
�.�Valley.
Community of Opportunity
C) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
co ® No Recommendation
L1)
r -I Note: The motion was made
�to "Defer the proposal to a
future Comp Plan amendment
CC
a update."
(, Vote: 3 TO 3
Spokane`
j Valley.
Community of Opportunim
*DISCUSSION:
Property already Medium
Density Residential
Medium Density
Designation is a
transitional designation
Public comment opposed
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: June 2, 2015
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business
❑ information ® admin. report
Department Director Approval:
❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Administrative report — Exercise of powers of initiative and referendum
in Washington non -charter code cities.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 1.20.010; RCW 35A.11.080 - .100
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Adoption of SVMC 1.20.010 in 2005
BACKGROUND: Interest has been expressed recently regarding how the powers of initiative
and referendum are exercised in a Washington non -charter code city. Staff put together a
PowerPoint presentation to explain what these powers are, and how they may be used in a city
such as ours.
OPTIONS: NA
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: NA
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Cary Driskell, City Attorney
ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint presentation
Exercise of initiative and
referendum in Washington
non -charter code cities
Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Power of initiative - generally
The power of initiative in cities is the exercise of power
by citizens to directly initiate and enact legislation,
rather than being done by the elected representatives
(city council)
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Power of referendum - generally
The power of referendum in cities is the right of citizens
to have an ordinance recently adopted by the city council
submitted to the voters of that city in an attempt to
reject it.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Obtaining these powers
This discussion will focus on initiative and referendum
in a non -charter code city, such as Spokane Valley.
Exercise of powers of initiative and referendum are not
automatic in non -charter code cities.
RCW 35A.ii.o8o authorizes cities to adopt the powers
of initiative and referendum.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Spokane Valley adopted in 2005
The City of Spokane Valley adopted the powers of
initiative and referendum pursuant to RCW 35A.ii.o8o in
2005 through the adoption of Ordinance 05-028, which
was codified as SVMC 1.20.010.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Sufficiency of petition
A petition must meet certain requirements pursuant to RCW
35A.ol.o4o before it will be considered legally sufficient
including:
Formatting specifications;
A prescribed warning statement (regarding multiple
signatures/ineligible voter/false statements constitute a crime);
3- A reference to any applicable state or local statute/code;
4. A true copy of the ordinance to be adopted or referred;
5. The format of signatures; and
6 Various additional miscellaneous requirements.
Although not clearly stated in statute, the local city clerk is
required to determine whether the format and wording of a
petition is legally sufficient.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Number of signatures needed
A petition must contain sufficient signatures to be deemed valid,
pursuant to RCW 35A.11.loo.
Requires at least 15% of the registered voters in the last preceding
city general election to sign petition;
The last preceding general election in COSV was 2015, in which
51,512 were registered to vote, meaning at least 7,726 would need
to sign a petition for initiative or referendum to be valid;
COSV would contract with Spokane County Auditor to determine
whether sufficient signatures were gathered, cost would likely be
several thousand dollars.
If insufficient numbers of signers filed, the petitioners have 10
additional days to amend petition by filing additional names.
Signatures are only good for six months. RCW 35A.o1.o4o(8)
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Referendum —options
If the county auditor finds there were sufficient valid
signatures, then the ordinance subject to referendum is put
on hold and does not become effective until the council
exercises one of two options:
The council can reconsider the ordinance within 20 days
and repeal the ordinance in its entirety; or
The council can submit the measure to the voters of the city
for approval or disapproval. If referendum vote is favorable,
the challenged ordinance never becomes effective and is
noted on its face as having been successfully challenged by
referendum.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Initiative - options
Once the 15% signature requirement is met, and the
language/format of the petition deemed sufficient, the
city council has two options:
The city council can pass the proposed ordinance
without alteration within 20 days after the county
auditor's certificate of sufficiency was received; or
The city council may cause a special election to be held
on the next available election date, which is at least 45
days after the city council calls for the election. If a
general election will occur within go days, it shall be
held then to avoid the need for a special election.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Notice of the election
The city clerk shall publish the ordinance or
proposition to be submitted to the voters at least once
in each of the daily papers not less than five days and
no more than 20 days before the election. If there is
no daily paper, then in each weekly paper published
therein. RCW 35.17.310 This notice requirement is in
addition to those contained in RCW 29A.36.o80.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Initiative - effective date
If the number of votes cast are in favor of the proposed
ordinance, as proven by the certified results from the
county auditor, then it becomes effective immediately
and is made a part of the city's record of ordinances.
RCW 35.17.330
Any ordinance adopted by initiative shall be marked
on the records as having been adopted by initiative,
which then cannot be repealed or amended except by a
vote of the people. Such a subsequent vote may be
proposed by resolution of the city council.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Statutory limitation on referendum
There are a number of types of ordinances which are statutorily
precluded from being stricken down by referendum. RCW
35A.11.o90
Ordinances initiated by petition (through the initiative process);
Emergency ordinances necessary for the immediate preservation
of public peace, health and safety or for the support of the city
government and its existing public institutions which contain a
statement of urgency and are passed by unanimous vote of the
council;
3. Ordinances providing for local improvement districts;
4. Ordinances appropriating money;
5. Ordinances providing for or approving collective bargaining;
6. Ordinances providing for compensation or working conditions of
employees; and
7. Ordinances authorizing or repealing the levy of taxes.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Court -imposed limitations
In addition to the statutory limitations, there are appellate court
decisions in cases where they reviewed whether the subject was the
type that was appropriate for this type of action, and whether it was a
topic appropriate for use of direct legislation. More specifically, the
Courts came up with a two -test analysis, both of which must be
satisfied to be a valid exercise of initiative or referendum power.
Administrative v. Legislative - Is the underlying action being regulated
legislative, or is it administrative in nature? If it is administrative, it is not
subject to initiative or referendum. If it is legislative, then it may be
subject to initiative and referendum, pending the next test. The
distinction between these two is not always clear or obvious and will be
explained shortly.
Power granted to city council v. granted to the corporate entity - If it is a
power granted to the city council, then it is not subject to initiative and
referendum. If the authority to regulate was granted to the city, then it
may be subject to initiative and referendum.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Administrative v. Legislative
The appellate courts have applied a two-part test to
determine whether something is administrative or
legislative.
Actions relating to subjects of a permanent and
general character are usually regarded as legislative
matters. Additionally, it will be considered legislative
if the power to be exercised is a new policy or plan
Actions taken on subjects of a temporary and special
nature are usually regarded as administrative.
Additionally, it is generally administrative if it merely
pursues a plan already adopted by the council.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Administrative v. Legislative —cont.
Still not clear? A review of applicable case law decisions may
provide more clarity.
City of Port Angeles v. Our Water -Our Choice!, 170 Wn.2d 1 (2010) -
The decision to fluoridate the city water supply is administrative in
nature.
➢ Ruano v. Spellman, 8i Wn.2d Bao (1973) - The selection of a
contractor and other actions incident to a building contract are
administrative in nature.
Heider v. Seattle, ioo Wn.2d 874 (i984) - An amendment to a
comprehensive street name ordinance is an administrative action,
since it is enacted pursuant to a plan already adopted by the
legislative body.
Leonard v. Bothell, 87 Wn.2d 847 (1976) - A site-specific rezone
amendment is an administrative action, as it implements the
existing zoning code or comprehensive plan.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Administrative v. Legislative —cont.
Durocher v. King County, 8o Wn.2d 139 (1972) - The act of
granting an unclassified use permit is administrative in nature.
Ballasiotes v. Gardner, 97 Wn.2d 191 (1982) - The implementation
of a punch -card balloting system is legislative in nature.
Earle M. Jorgensen Co. v. Seattle, 99 Wn.2d 86i (1983), and Scott
Paper Co. v. Anacortes, go Wn.2d 19 (1978) - The setting of rates
is a legislative act.
Paget v. Logan, 78 Wn.2d 349 (1970) - A decision regarding where
to locate a multipurpose stadium is a legislative act.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney i6
Granted to council or entity?
Even if the authority is determined to be legislative in
nature in the above analysis, it is still then necessary to
determine if the authority to adopt was granted to the city
council, or if, instead, the grant of authority was to the
electorate as a whole or was silent on the issue.
If the statutory authority to undertake a particular action
was granted specifically to the city council, the powers of
initiative and referendum are unable to be exercised.
If the legislative grant of authority for an action was to the
corporate entity, namely the electorate as a whole, or where
it is silent as to whom the grant of authority is to, then
direct legislation in the form of the exercise of the powers
of initiative and referendum is available.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Granted to council or entity?
An example of a statute where the Legislature reserving the
power exclusively in the city council is RCW 35 .Zi.2Z5,
wherein it states "[t]he legislative authority of'a city may
establish a transportation benefit district subject to the
provisions of chapter 36.73 RCW."
An example where the authority was reserved to the
corporate entity (exercisable by the general populace) is
found in RCW 35A.66.o20, relating to a local option on sale
of alcohol within the city limits. RCW 35A.66.o2o states
that "[t]he qualified electors of any code city may petition
for an election upon the question of whether the sale of
liquor shall be permitted within the boundaries of such
city..." RCW 35A.66.o20.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Granted to council or entity?
Again, court cases interpreting this may be instructive.
Mukilteo Citizens for Simple Government v. City of Mukilteo, 174
Wn.2d 4i (2012) - RCW 46.63.170(1) granted to local legislative
bodies the exclusive power to legislate on the use and operation of
automated traffic safety (red light) cameras. An initiative to restrict
the authority of the council and limiting the amount of fines was
invalid.
City of Sequim v. Malkasian, 157 Wn.2d 251 (2006) - An initiative to
restrict a city's authority to issue revenue bonds pursuant to chapter
35.41 RCW exceeds initiative power and is invalid because the
Legislature unambiguously granted such authority exclusively to
city legislative bodies.
Leonard v. Bothell, 87 Wn.2d 847 (1976) - A referendum challenging
a rezone amendment was not allowed by the court because the city
council, not the electorate as a whole, was granted authority by the
Legislature to adopt and modify the zoning code.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Granted to council or entity?
>- State ex rel. Bowen v. Kruegel, 67 Wn.2d 673 (1965) - An
ordinance providing for annexation is not subject to a
referendum because the powers of annexation were
granted by the Legislature to the mayor and city council.
>- State ex rel. Haas v. Pomeroy, 5o Wn.2d 23 (i957) - An
ordinance setting utility rates for a city -owned water
system (financed by revenue bonds) is not subject to
referendum because the authority to set utility rates was
specifically granted to the city council when the system
is financed by revenue bonds. This ensures citizens
cannot inappropriately interfere with the contractual
obligation to repay the bonds to the bondholders.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Granted to council or entity?
City of Seattle v. Yes for Seattle, 122 Wn. App. 382 (2004),
review denied , 153 Wn.2d 1020 (zoos) - A citizen's initiative
to require development restrictions and creek restoration
activities was held invalid because development regulations
were adopted under the GMA and the authority to adopt
them is specifically granted to the city legislative authority.
Whatcom County v. Brisbane, 125 Wn.2d 345 (1994)• A
critical areas ordinance adopted under the GMA was not
subject to the referendum power of the citizens of
Whatcom County even though the power of referendum
was granted to the people in the Whatcom County Charter.
The power to enact critical areas ordinances under the GMA
is specifically granted to the legislative authority of a city or
county.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Summary of exceptions process
A multistep approach is necessary in order to
determine if a specific ordinance can be subject to the
powers of initiative or referendum.
It must be determined if the ordinance is an
administrative or legislative act of the city.
It must be determined if the underlying issue (the
subject of the initiative or referendum petition) has
been granted by the Legislature to the corporate entity
or to the legislative authority of the city.
The statutory exceptions from the referendum process
in RCW 35A.ii.o90 must be checked.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Abandonment of powers
There are two ways to initiate the repeal of initiative and
referendum powers.
The city council would pass a resolution of intention,
proposing abandonment of initiative and referendum
powers.
Citizens petition for abandonment of the powers. The
petition would need to be signed by qualified electors equal
in number to not less than 10 percent of the votes cast at the
last general municipal election.
At least six years shall have passed since the adoption of the
powers of initiative and referendum before the process of
abandonment of these powers can commence.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney 23
Abandonment - election
Once the petition has been found sufficient by the city
clerk or the resolution of intention has been approved
by the city council, an election of all city citizens must
be held. The election shall be held at the next general
election (if one is scheduled within i8o days) or at a
special election.
If a majority of the voters at the election vote to repeal
the powers of initiative and referendum, they are
relinquished and no longer available.
City of Spokane Valley - Office of the City Attorney
Meeting Date:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan 2016-2021
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 90.48, Chapter 173-200 WAC, Title 33 U.S.C. 1251-1376;
Storm and Surface Water Utility: Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.80; RCW 36.36.040;
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Approval of 2015-2020 SW CIP May 27, 2014.
BACKGROUND: Staff has developed a Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan (SW CIP) that
organizes and prioritizes top stormwater problems and concerns based on public health and
safety needs and balances those needs with available local, state, and federal resources. The
program identifies a list of projects that will make improvements to address or remedy top
problems.
Funding for projects in the SW CIP could come through grants, available capital funds in the
Stormwater Utility 402 account, and the Aquifer Protection Area (APA) Fund 403. It includes a
goal to balance working capital to $1.5M in reserves in the 402, and $500k in the 403 accounts.
Fund strategy includes maximizing local funds to the highest extent through grant applications
for outside funding of the highest priority projects. If the City does not receive grants in the
amounts required for certain projects, the City could decide to proceed with the project with
added local funds, or delay the project until funding comes available.
Staff is requesting to bring the proposed SW CIP to the Council on the June 9, 2015 meeting for
its approval consideration.
OPTIONS: Discussion
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Consensus from City Council to bring this proposed
2016-2021 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan back on the June 9, 2015 Council agenda for
approval consideration.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Impacts include 2016 budget requests and discussion for
future budget years in the 402 and 403 funding accounts.
STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth, Public Works Director;
Art Jenkins, Stormwater Engineer
ATTACHMENTS: 2016-2021 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan Presentation
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
1
Stormwater Utility
Capital Improvement Program
2016 - 2021 Update
June 2, 2015
Public Works Department
Kwyry�
0
STORM AIN
DA NDR
CIP PurDoses
Stormwater Utility
2
Align the utility's
planning,
engineering, and
financial inputs
in one guiding
document
Leverage Return the best
funding value to
opportunities ratepayers
1
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Highlights for the 2016-2021 SW CIP
Increased the reserve from Si.oM to $1.5M
Ecology Grants received for 2016 projects:
• Pavement Preservation Projects -$900I<
• Decant Canopy in 2016 - $400K
▪ Construction of Sprague LIT - $2.oM
Ecology is considering a new "Green
Retrofit" funding program
• Diversion Projects
• Appleway Improvements, Farr to
University
2016 Projects
"'City/Outside
),1
tatus
Proposed
Grant?
Small Works — Projects
UIC Retrofits w/Pavement
Preservation
Sprague Avenue LID,
University to Park
Decant Canopy
100% / 0%
25%/75%
25%/75%
5% / 95%
Design/Const
Design/Const
Construction
Construction
Appleway Improvements
Diversion Projects
0%/100%
Pre -Design
25%/75%
300,000
Awarded 2015
600,000
1,940,000
400,000
none
Awarded 2015
Awarded 2015
$50,000
Final Design
$70,000
$3,360,000
Apply in 2015
Apply in 2015
2
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Retrofits with Pavement Preservation
$600,000+ for 2016
75% Ecology Grant received
Makes improvements to
stormwater facilities in
conjunction with pavement
preservation projects to
maximize benefit to
community
Projects developed from UIC
retrofit plan, pavement
program
3
5 is
2016-2021 Stormwater Improvement
Plan Summary
Project
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Total.
Grant?
APA
Annual Small Works Projects
300
300
300
300
300
300
1,800
x
(Retrofits with Pavement Preservation Projects
600
300
300
300
300
300
' 2,100
X
x
Havana -Yale Diversion
10
270
280x
x
'Ponderosa & Chester Creek Diversions
30
400
430x
x
Chester Cr Wetland Overflow Improvements
40
160
200x
x
Wellhead Protection Study and Pre -Design
80
80
x
x
Dishman-Mica Infiltration Facility Plan
40
40
x
x
Sprague, University to Park Stormwater Improvements
1940
' 1,940
X
X
Spokane County Regional Decant Facility Canopy
400
' 400
X
X
IGlenrose Surface Water Diversion
30
250
280
x
x
'Montgomery, Argonne to Mansfield Retrofit
100
1000
1,100
x
x
Petroleum Transport Routes, Spill Protection
25
175
200
x
x
'NW Yardly Retrofits (Area NW of Fancher/Broadway)
100
1150
1,250x
x
Dishman-Mica, 16111 to Appleway Retrofits
300
300x
x
NE Yardly Retrofits (Area East of Fancher & North of 1-90
100
900
1,000x
x
VeracrestGroundwater/SlomwalerConveyance
350
350x
x
Appleway Improvements, Farr to University
50
100
1200
1,350x
x
Argonne, 1-90 to Montgomery Retrofits
400
400x
x
Sloan's Addition (15th/Stanley)
250
250
x
Heather Park (16th & Rocky Ridge) SD Improvements
Totals:
3,360
2,105
2,685
300
300
x
Bowdish, 32nd to 20th SD Improvements
600
600x
x
2850 2,150 ' 1,500 14,650
Retrofits with Pavement Preservation
$600,000+ for 2016
75% Ecology Grant received
Makes improvements to
stormwater facilities in
conjunction with pavement
preservation projects to
maximize benefit to
community
Projects developed from UIC
retrofit plan, pavement
program
3
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Decant Canopy
$400,000 in 2016
75% Ecology grant
funded
WSDOT
partnership — local
match
Extends
Operations of
Facility
EffatIEMEISSIMESIOSOW
Sprague Ave LID, University to Park
$2,000,000 in 2015/2016
75% Ecology grant funded
Project developed from UIC
retrofit plan
Options include swales,
planter boxes, catchbasin
retrofits
4
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Appleway Improvements, Farr to University
Summer 2015: Propose as
"Green Retrofit" Project (l00%
design grant) for portion of
Appleway meeting criteria.
Coordinate w/Appleway Trail
June 2016: 50% Design
Aug 2016: Grant application
for construction
Suggest 50/5o split between
Street and Stormwater Funds
to convert existing dryland
swales.
Appleway Current Frontage, Farr to University - 5,876 ft (Phase 3B)
Appleway
L
Un -Improved
Dry Swales to Irrigated
Exist Irrig. Area to Swale
Exist Irrig. Swale
Totals:
3,128 ft
1,420 ft
1,260 ft
$13o,000 $39o,000
$24o,000 $o
$110,000 $110,000
68 ft $o
$o
5,876 ft
$480,000
$500,000
$520,000
$240,000
$220,000
$o
$980,000
5
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Diversion Projects
$7o,000 for full design at 4 to
6 locations in 2016
Construction in 2017
Seek grant opportunities to
fund with a 25% local match
Goal to eliminate direct
discharges to surface waters of
the State
Cdy of Spokane
I ,jJ
8th & Havana
150 or Millwood
r,
fJ
City of Spokane Valley
Sullivan Bridges
ii
4tL& rtyt-
a rt
ke
1
6
SW CAPITAL PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Next Steps
June 9th Council:
- Motion to Approve the
2016- 2021 SIP
2016-2021
Stormwater
Improvement Plan
(SIP)_
Discussion
To:
From:
Re:
DRAFT
ADVANCE AGENDA
For Planning Discussion Purposes Only
as of May 28, 2015; 8:30 a.m.
Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative
Council & Staff
City Clerk, by direction of City Manager
Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings
June 9, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, June 1]
SPECIAL PRESENTATION: WSDOT — I-90/Barker Interchange — DOT Rep (Eric Guth) (20 minutes)
1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley (20 minutes)
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) (5 minutes)
3. Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Montgomery Ave St Preservation — Steve Worley (10 minutes)
4. Motion Consideration: Comp Plan/Citizen Site -Specific Amendment Request — John Hohman (60 minutes)
5. Motion Consideration: 2016-2021 Stormwater CIP — Eric Guth (10 minutes)
6. Admin Report: Comp Plan/Overlays and Text Amendments - John Hohman (20 minutes)
7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes)
8. Info Only: Mansfield Ave. Connection Project #0156 — Steve Worley [*estimated meeting: 150 minutes]
June 16, 2015, Special Meeting: Budget Workshop, 8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. [due Mon, June 8]
Spokane Valley Council Chambers (No evening meeting June 16, 2015)
June 23, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
Proclamation: National Parks & Recreation Month (July)
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Proposed Resolution Adopting 2016-2021 Six Year TIP — Steve Worley
3. Motion Consideration: Bid Award for Mansfield Avenue Connection Project #0156
4. Motion Consideration: JAG Grant Application - Morgan Koudelka
5. Motion Consideration: Comp Plan/Overlays and Text Amendments —
6. Admin Report: Bus Shelter Plan — Eric Guth
7. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
8. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports
John Hohman
[due Mon, June 15]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
— S. Worley (15 min)
(10 minutes)
(60 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 125 minutes]
June 30, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Historic Preservation — Gloria Mantz
2. Admin Report: Tourism Promotion Area (TPA) — Erik Lamb
3. Community & Economic Development Project Updates and Progress Report —
4. Parks & Recreation Project Updates and Progress Report — Mike Stone
5. Public Works Project Updates and Progress Report — Eric Guth
6. Advance Agenda
July 7, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
July 14, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
July 21, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
[due Mon, June 22]
(20 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[*estimated meeting: 80 minutes]
John Hohman
[due Mon, June 29]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, July 6]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, July 13]
(5 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 5/28/2015 2:46:42 PM Page 1 of 3
July 28, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
3. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports
August 4, 2015 — No Meeting (National Night Out)
August 11, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: 2016 Budget Estimated Revenues/expenditures — Mark Calhoun
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
[due Mon, July 20]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[du
August 18, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [du
1. Advance Agenda
August 25, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2016 Budget Revenues, including Property Taxes —Mark Calhoun
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes, motion to set Sept 22 Budget Hearing )
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
4. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports
[du
September 1, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [du
1. Outside Agency Presentations (Economic Development, & Social Service; 5 minutes each)
2. Advance Agenda
September 8, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. City Manager Presentation of 2016 Preliminary Budget — Mike Jackson
3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
September 15, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
September 22, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2016 Budget — Mark Calhoun
2. First Reading Property Tax Ordinance — Mark Calhoun
3. Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Grant Allocations — Mark Calhoun
4. Admin Report: 2015 Budget Amendment — Mark Calhoun
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
6. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports
September 29, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
October 6, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
October 13, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2015 Budget Amendment — Mark Calhoun
2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
3. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance — Mark Calhoun
4. First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2016 Budget — Mark Calhoun
5. First Reading Ordinance Amending 2015 Budget — Mark Calhoun
6. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
e Mon, Aug 3]
(5 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
e Mon, Aug 10]
(5 minutes)
e Mon, Aug 17]
(15 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
e Mon, Aug 24]
(90 minutes)
[due Mon, Aug 31]
(5 minutes)
(30 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due
[due
Mon, Sept 7]
(5 minutes)
Mon, Sept 14]
(20 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Sept 21
[due Mon, Sept 28]
[due Mon, Oct 5]]
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(15 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(5 minutes)
Draft Advance Agenda 5/28/2015 2:46:42 PM Page 2 of 3
October 20, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
October 27, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Second reading Adopting 2016 Budget — Mark Calhoun
3. Second Reading Amending 2015 Budget — Mark Calhoun
4. Admin Report: Lodging Tax Advisory Cmte (LTAC) Recommended
5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
6. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports
November 3, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Fee Resolution for 2016 — Mark Calhoun
2. Advance Agenda
November 10, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
November 17, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
November 24, 2015 — no meeting (Thanksgiving week)
December 1, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Advance Agenda
December 8, 2015, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes)
2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2106 — Mark Calhoun
3. Motion Consideration: LTAC Allocations — Mark Calhoun
4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda
[due Mon, Oct 12]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Oct 19]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(10 minutes)
Allocations — Mark Calhoun (25 minutes)
(5 minutes)
December 15 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
December 22, 2015 — no meeting
December 29, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
January 5, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m.
1. Council Officer Elections for Mayor and Deputy Mayor — Chris Bainbridge
*time for public or Council comments not included
[due Mon, Oct 26]
(15 minutes)
[due Mon, Nov 2]
(5 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Nov 9]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Nov 23]
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Nov 30]
(5 minutes)
(10 minutes)
(20 minutes)
(5 minutes)
[due Mon, Dec 7]
[due Mon, Dec 21]
[due Mon, Dec 28]
(15 minutes)
OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS:
Admissions Tax Used Oil Signage Ordinance
Avista Electrical Franchise (2nd read Ord 15-011)
Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement
LID (Local Improvement District)
Marijuana, Legislative Update
Marijuana, Minor in Consumption
Public Safety Quarterly Costs
Sidewalks and Development
SRTMC Interlocal Agreement (prior to end of year)
Draft Advance Agenda 5/28/2015 2:46:42 PM Page 3 of 3
Spokane
Walley
City of Spokane Valley
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Page Title
1 Cover Sheet
2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested
3 Online Applications Received
4 Construction Applications Received
5 Land Use Applications Received
6 Construction Permits Issued
7 Land Use Applications Approved
8 Development Inspections Performed
9 Code Enforcement
10 Revenue
11 Building Permit Valuations
Printed 05/01/2015 12:09 Page 1 of 11
l��Ol.il
.0 00.0 Valley
Pre -Application Meetings Requested
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements
related to their project proposal.
Community Development scheduled a total of 9 Pre -Application Meetings in April 2015.
15
10
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Land Use Pre -Application - Commercial Pre -App
Meeting
Commercial Pre -App
Land Use Pre -Application Meeting
Monthly Totals
Annual Total To -Date:
44
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep
6
10
Oct Nov Dec
12 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 11 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Printed 05/01/2015 12:09 Page 2 of 11
l��a.Ile
4000 Valley
Online Applications Received
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development received a total of 145 Online Applications in April 2015.
150
100
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Trade Permit
Sign Permit
Right of Way Permit
Reroof Permit Demolition Permit - Approach Permit
l
Approach Permit
Demolition Permit
Reroof Permit
Right of Way Permit
Sign Permit
Trade Permit
Monthly Totals
Annual Total To -Date:
Printed 05/01/2015 12:09
465
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 13 20 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
30 37 27 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
59 54 65 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
97 108 115 145 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 3 of 11
Spokane
uai1ey
Construction Applications Received
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development received a total of 465 Construction Applications in April 2015.
600
400
200
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New - Other Construction Permits
Commercial - New
Commercial - TI
Residential - New
Commercial - Trade
Residential - Trade
Residential - Accessory
Demolition
Sign
Other Construction Permits
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
3 3 51 3 0 0
14 12 24 13 0 0 0 0
8 11 22 16 0 0 0 0
*23 *23 *26 *18 0 0 0 0 0
*86 *83 *146 *121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10 5 14 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 *4 7 *4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11 *9 11 *13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*97 *131 *169 *270 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Monthly Totals
253 281 470 465 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total To -Date:
Printed 05/01/2015 12:13
1,469
Page 4 of 11
*Includes Online Applications.
I��Ol.ile
,Walley,
Land Use Applications Received
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development received a total of 59 Land Use Applications in April 2015.
100
50
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
.:,a Boundary Line Adjustment ® Binding Site Plan Preliminary
Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting
PI Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment
State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA)
Administrative Exception/Interpretation
Other Land Use Permits
oundary Line Adjustment
• hort Plat Preliminary
ong Plat Preliminary
inding Site Plan Preliminary
inal Platting
r oning Map/Comp Plan Amendment
tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
dministrative
xception/Interpretation
ther Land Use Permits
2
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1
5
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
50 51 79 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
onthly Totals 54 58 89
0
Annual Total To -Date:
Printed 05/01/2015 12:13
260
Page 5 of 11
.00 Valley,
Construction Permits Issued
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development issued a total of 401 Construction Permits in April 2015.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Commercial - New
Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits
Commercial - New
Commercial - TI
Residential - New
Commercial - Trade
Residential - Trade
Residential - Accessory
Demolition
Sign
Other Construction Permits
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
2 3 22
12 12 23
6 14 13
24 20 23
80 92 120
10 5 14
0 4 7
11 9 11
68 99 127
33 0 0
14 0 0
22 0 0
19 0 0
133 0 0
6 0 0
4 0 0
11 0 0
159 0 0
o o 0
o o 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
o o 0
o o 0
0 0 0
Monthly Totals
213 258 360 401 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total To -Date:
Printed 05/01/2015 12:14
1,232
Page 6 of 11
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
.000 Valley
Land Use Applications Approved
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development approved a total of 44 Land Use Applications in April 2015.
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Boundary Line Adjustment
Short Plat Preliminary
Long Plat Preliminary
Binding Site Plan Preliminary
Final Platting
Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment
State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA)
Administrative Exception/Interpretation
Other Land Use Permits
oundary Line Adjustment
• hort Plat Preliminary
ong Plat Preliminary
inding Site Plan Preliminary
inal Platting
r oning Map/Comp Plan Amendment
tate Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
dministrative
xception/Interpretation
ther Land Use Permits
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
38 52 51 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
onthly Totals
43 52 56 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Annual Total To -Date:
Printed 05/01/2015 12:14
195
Page 7 of 11
.010 Valley
Development Inspections Performed
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development performed a total of 1213 Development Inspections in April 2015. Development
Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections.
1,600
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
-6— 2013 2014 --- 2015
2015',
20141
2013
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
801 974 1,059 1,213 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0
601 633 996 1,281 1,321 1,295 1,412 1,223 1,305 1,478 973 1,026
465 503 808 1,026 1,060 1,015 1,084 1,078 1,186 1,015 833 673
Printed 05/01/2015 12:30 Page 8 of 11
Totals
i��a.Ile
p_Malley,
Code Enforcement
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Code Enforcement Officers responded to 35 citizen requests in the month of April. They are listed by type
below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated.
40
20
0
ii1�14
'1,!,111111111111 sh4fc(%
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Complaint, Non -Violation
Environmental ' General Nuisance ® Property
Complaint, Non -Violation
Environmental
General
Nuisance
Monthly Totals
Annual Total To -Date:
116
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
10 18 26 22 0 0 0 0 0
10 7 5 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Printed 05/01/2015 12:30 Page 9 of 11
.010 Valley
Revenue
2015
Trend
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Community Development Revenue totaled $187,199 in April 2015.
300,000
250,000
200,000
150,000
100,000
50,000
0
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
--•-- 2015 2014 Five -Year Trend
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Totals
$74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $531,476
$79,763 $67,972 $133,730 $131,195 $224,961 $199,161 $138,904 $100,987 $134,164 $109,327 $91,979 $67,777 $1,479,920
$74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046
$158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504
$34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $1,552,558
$43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 11,083,255
$87,229 $84,626 $109,029 $96,800 $305,185 $102,781 $87,805 $87,724 $107,002 $73,100 $72,948 $64,009 e,278,238
Printed 05/01/2015 12:31 Page 10 of 11
.000 Valley
Building Permit Valuation
2015
Trend
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
Community Development
Monthly Report
01/01/2015 - 04/30/2015
Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $18,644,281 in April 2015.
35,000,000
30, 000, 000
25,000,000
20, 000, 000
15,000,000
10,000,000
5,000,000
0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
-0-- 2015 2014 - Five -Year Trend
Jan
Feb Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov Dec
Totals
$2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $40.31M
$7.58M $3.92M $6.13M $6.87M $23.25M $18.45M $11.28M $6.65M $10.76M $7.63M $4.10M $2.93M
$3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $11.99M $7.70M $3.59M $6.30M 111.89M
$25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M p173.95M
$0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M
$1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M MI
$7.06M $6.34M $6.82M $6.64M $32.55M $4.86M $5.36M $3.91M $5.71M $3.01M $1.93M $2.29M
109.55M
Printed 05/01/2015 12:31 Page 11 of 11
Spokane
valley
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
Memorandum
To: Mike Jackson, City Manager
From: Chelsie Taylor, Interim Finance Director
Date: May 18, 2015
Re Finance Department Activity Report — April 2015
Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of April
2015 and included herein is a 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and
Expenditures through the end of April.
2014 Yearend Process
The 2014 books were closed during April. We have begun preparation of the annual financial
report and will have it completed by the end of May. We hope to have the State Auditor's Office
on site by early June to begin the audit of 2014.
2016 Budget Development Process
The 2016 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March and on
April 10th we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the
time the budget is adopted on October 27th the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss
the budget on seven occasions including two public hearings.
June 16 Council budget workshop
August 11
August 25
September 8
September 22
October 13
October 27
Admin report on 2016 revenues and expenditures
Public hearing #1 on 2016 revenues and expenditures
City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2016 Budget
Public hearing #2 on 2016 Budget
First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2016 Budget
Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2016 Budget
Budget to Actual Comparison Report
A report reflecting 2015 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which
a 2015 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 17. Because we attempt to provide
this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from records that are not formally
closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is
realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is
materially accurate.
We've included the following information in the report:
• Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and
by type in all other funds.
PAFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 04.docx Page 1
• A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General
Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund.
• The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund
balance figures are those that are expected to be reflected in our 2014 Annual Financial
Report.
• Columns of information include:
o The 2015 Budget as adopted.
o April 2015 activity.
o Cumulative 2015 activity through April 2015.
o Budget remaining in terms of dollars.
o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed.
A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5):
Recurring revenues collections are currently at 18.80% of the amount budgeted with 33.3% of
the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are
collected.
• Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and
October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser
amounts typically remitted in June and December. In January we received one final
payment related to the 2014 collections, so the amounts related to 2015 start in the month of
February. Property taxes received thus far in 2015 are $753,158 or 6.68% of the amount
budgeted.
• Sales tax collections represent only 3 -months of collections thus far because taxes collected
in April are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of May. Collections are
currently $4,164,874 or 23.63% of the amount budgeted.
• Gambling taxes are at $14,934 or 2.79% of the amount budgeted. This is because they are
paid quarterly with first quarter payments due by April 30; however, many of the first quarter
gambling tax returns were remitted during the first part of May 2015.
• Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month
following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2015 we have received $58,400 or 4.72% of the
amount budgeted.
• State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items
such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal
justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a
calendar quarter. Through April we've received remittances totaling $472,537 or 26.71 % of
the amount budgeted.
• Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County
with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm
fees. Through April 2015 we've received remittances through the month of March with
receipts of $386,776 or 25.66% of the amount budgeted.
• Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and
plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently $499,646 or
3711% of the amount budgeted.
• Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and
recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace.
Currently, revenues total $228,661 or 40.58% of the amount budgeted.
Recurring expenditures are currently at 28.98% of the amount budgeted with 33.3% of the year
elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily
expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 04.docx Page 2
Investments (page 18)
Investments at April 30 total $47,331,691 and are composed of $42,259,257 in the Washington
State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,072,434 in bank CDs.
Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 19)
Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through April and total $4,722,747 including
general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $149,003 (3.26%) greater than
the same 3 -month period in 2014.
Economic Indicators (pages 20 — 22)
The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax
revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy.
1. Sales taxes (page 20) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are
spending on the purchase of goods.
2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our
area by tourists or business travelers.
3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of real estate sales.
Page 20 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or
criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2006.
• Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $114,356 or 2.82%.
• Tax receipts peaked in 2014 at $17,440,083, besting the previous record year of 2007 when
$17,437,467 was collected. In terms of dollars collected this represents an increase of
$2,616, but when one considers the increase in the CPI over that seven-year period plus the
fact that Spokane Valley now has considerably more businesses, one could reasonably
argue that our local economy is still in a recovery mode.
Page 21 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning
January 2006.
• Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $6,378 or 7.89%.
• Collections reached an all-time high in 2014, exceeding the previous high in 2013 by
$30,595 or 5.90%.
Page 22 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail
beginning January 2006.
• Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $155,553 or
74.09%.
• Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and
2009, and are slowly gaining ground.
Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 23)
This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General
Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds
the City currently has outstanding.
• The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed
value for property taxes which for 2015 is $7,393,971,582. Following the August 2014
refunding of the 2003 LTGO Bonds and the December 1, 2014, debt service payment the
City has $6,675,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 6.02% of our
nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.20% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this
amount:
P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports1Council Monthly Reports1201512015 04.docx Page 3
o $5,425,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds
are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane
Public Facilities District.
o $1,250,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around
CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected
by the City.
Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 24 and 25)
The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101.
These include:
• Page 24 provides a 10 -year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail
beginning January 2006.
o Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $6,781 or
1.57%
o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently
decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $1,878,000 in the years 2011
through 2014.
• Page 25 provides a 6 -year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail
beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed).
o Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to
the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a "clean cutoff' in
terms of when a vendor pays the tax. Tax revenues currently reported for March include
only those that were received through March 31 and will be adjusted for future
collections pertaining to that month.
o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to
what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households.
o The 2015 Budget was adopted with a revenue estimate of $2,565,100. We will watch
this closely as we progress through the coming months.
P:IFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 04.docx Page 4
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
#001 - GENERAL FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
Revenues
Property Tax 11,277,100 559,162 753,158 (10,523,942) 6.68%
Sales Tax 17,628,400 1,235,252 4,164,874 (13,463,526) 23.63%
Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,468,700 106,888 356,917 (1,111,783) 24.30%
Sales Tax - Public Safety 820,100 59,479 200,956 (619,144) 24.50%
Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 535,100 11,683 14,934 (520,166) 2.79%
Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,238,000 31,215 58,400 (1,179,600) 4.72%
State Shared Revenues 1,768,900 127,593 472,537 (1,296,363) 26.71%
Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,507,100 119,679 386,776 (1,120,324) 25.66%
Community Development 1,325,100 174,902 499,646 (825,454) 37.71%
Recreation Program Fees 563,500 80,086 228,661 (334,839) 40.58%
Miscellaneous Department Revenue 95,900 6,041 38,702 (57,198) 40.36%
Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 131,200 9,223 35,169 (96,031) 26.81%
Transfer -in - #101 (street admin) 39,700 3,308 13,233 (26,467) 33.33%
Transfer -in - #105 (h/m tax -CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00%
Transfer -in - #402 (storm admin) 13,400 1,117 4,467 (8,933) 33.33%
Total Recurring Revenues 38,442,200 2,525,628 7,228,429 (31,213,771) 18.80%
Expenditures
City Council 513,114 25,525 166,137 346,977 32.38%
City Manager 688,363 53,798 209,718 478,645 30.47%
Legal 461,839 34,803 132,305 329,534 28.65%
Public Safety 24,153,492 1,911,297 7,180,939 16,972,553 29.73%
Deputy City Manager 691,303 51,143 217,354 473,949 31.44%
Finance / IT 1,203,879 82,983 338,941 864,938 28.15%
Human Resources 243,317 19,129 75,336 167,981 30.96%
Public Works 921,914 58,208 248,589 673,326 26.96%
Community Development - Administration 261,094 19,537 87,018 174,076 33.33%
Community Development - Econ Dev 298,276 16,176 66,168 232,108 22.18%
Community Development - Dev Svc 1,424,944 111,088 423,095 1,001,849 29.69%
Community Development - Building 1,380,902 104,315 405,142 975,760 29.34%
Parks & Rec - Administration 286,947 22,182 90,292 196,655 31.47%
Parks & Rec - Maintenance 844,642 69,141 220,830 623,812 26.14%
Parks & Rec - Recreation 226,174 15,162 57,286 168,888 25.33%
Parks & Rec-Aquatics 496,200 4,178 7,525 488,675 1.52%
Parks & Rec - Senior Center 91,985 7,067 27,217 64,768 29.59%
Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 824,997 67,020 245,461 579,536 29.75%
Pavement Preservation 920,000 76,667 306,667 613,333 33.33%
General Government 1,741,200 109,858 381,418 1,359,782 21.91%
Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 325,000 27,083 108,333 216,667 33.33%
Transfers out - #310 (bond pmt>$434.6 /ease pr 67,600 5,633 22,533 45,067 33.33%
Transfers out - #310 (city hall o&m costs) 271,700 22,642 90,567 181,133 33.33%
Total Recurring Expenditures 38,338,882 2,914,635 11,108,871 27,230,011 28.98%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 103,318 (389,007) (3,880,442) (3,983,760)
Page 5
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
#001 - GENERAL FUND - continued
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
n/a
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget
April April 30 Remaining
of
Budget
0
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 0 0 #D!V/0!
Expenditures
Transfers out -#309 (park grant match) 100,000 8,333 33,333 66,667 33.33%
General Government - IT capital replacements 145,000 80,662 101,807 43,193 70.21%
City Manager (2 scanners) 3,000 0 0 3,000 0.00%
Public Safety (const offices for unit supervisors) 25,000 0 0 25,000 0.00%
Community & Econ Dev (comp plan update) 395,000 0 31,139 363,861 7.88%
Parks & Rec (upgrade dial-up modem at pools) 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00%
Parks & Rec (replace CP lounge carpet) 8,000 0 0 8,000 0.00%
Parks & Rec (CenterPlace 10yr anniversary) 7,400 0 0 7,400 0.00%
Police Department - CAD/RMS 949,000 0 0 949,000 0.00%
Law Enforcement Contingency 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,642,400 88,995 166,279 1,476,121 10.12%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,642,400) (88,995) (166,279) 1,476,121
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (1,539,082)1 (478,002) (4,046,721) (2,507,639)
Beginning unrestricted fund balance 24,328,568 24,328,568
Ending unrestricted fund balance 22,789,486 20,281,847
Page 6
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
#101 - STREET FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual
April
Actual thru Budget
April 30 Remaining
% of
Budget
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 1,859,900 140,406 437,207 (1,422,693) 23.51%
Investment Interest 3,000 228 651 (2,349) 21.72%
Utility Tax 2,565,100 174,738 565,532 (1,999,568) 22.05%
Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00%
Total Recurring Revenues 4,438,000 315,372 1,003,390 (3,434,610) 22.61%
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 677,297 60,953 261,487 415,810 38.61%
Supplies 111,500 18,852 24,355 87,145 21.84%
Services & Charges 2,122,808 39,577 206,067 1,916,741 9.71%
Snow Operations 520,000 (10,220) 138,717 381,283 26.68%
Intergovemmental Payments 748,000 222,437 123,089 624,911 16.46%
Interfund Transfers -out - #001 39,700 3,308 13,233 26,467 33.33%
Interfund Transfers -out - #501 (non -plow vehicle 12,077 1,006 4,026 8,051 33.33%
Interfund Transfers -out -#311 (pavement preserva 206,618 17,218 68,873 137,745 33.33%
Interfund Transfers -out - #502 (unemployment) 0 38 38 (38) #DIV/0!
Total Recurring Expenditures 4,438,000 353,170 839,885 3,598,115 18.92%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 0 (37,798) 163,506 163,506
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grants
Miscellaneous
0
0
0 0 0 #DIV/01
280 300 300 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 280 300 300 #DIV/0!
Expenditures
Capital 45,000
Pavement marking grinder 8,000
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 53,000
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
0 0 45,000 0.00%
0 6,019 1,981 75.23%
0 6,019 46,981 11.36%
Nonrecurring Expenditures (53,000) 280 (5,718) 47,282
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (53,000) (37,517) 157,787 210,787
Beginning fund balance 1,705,244 1,705,244
Ending fund balance 1,652,244 1,863,031
Page 7
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
#103 - PATHS & TRAILS
Revenues
Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Miscellaneous
Capital Outlay
Total expenditures
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
42015_
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
7,800 592 1,844 (5,956) 23.64%
0 4 12 12 #DIV/0!
7,800 596 1,856 (5,944) 23.80%
0
0
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,800 596 1,856 (5,944)
Beginning fund balance 29,828 29,828
Ending fund balance 37,628 31,684
#105 - HOTEL / MOTEL TAX FUND
Revenues
Hotel/Motel Tax 510,000 32,998 87,201 (422,799) 17.10%
Investment Interest 300 28 105 (195) 34.86%
Total revenues 510,300 33,027 87,306 (422,994) 17.11%
Expenditures
Interfund Transfers - #001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
Tourism Promotion 570,000 30,000 30,000 540,000 5.26%
Total expenditures 600,000 30,000 30,000 570,000 5.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (89,700) 3,027 57,306 (992,994)
Beginning fund balance 209,949 209,949
Ending fund balance 120,249 267,255
#106 - SOLID WASTE
Revenues
Sunshine Administrative Fee
Transfers in -#001
125,000
0
31,250 31,250
93,750 25.00%
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 125,000 31,250 31,250 93,750 25.00%
Expenditures
Professional Services 125,000 293 293 124,707 0.23%
Total expenditures 125,000 293 293 124,707 0.23%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 30,957 30,957 (30,957)
Beginning fund balance 7,340 7,340
Ending fund balance 7,340 38,297
Page 8
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
#120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer
0
0
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 0
Expenditures
Operations
Total expenditures
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
0
0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0
Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000
Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000
#121 - SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest
Interfund Transfer
8,200 558 1,645 (6,555) 20.06%
0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 8,200 558 1,645 (6,555) 20.06%
Expenditures
Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Revenues over (under) expenditures 8,200 558 1,645 (6,555)
Beginning fund balance 5,453,199 5,453,199
Ending fund balance 5,461,399 5,454,844
#1 22 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 800 54 160 (640) 19.94%
Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Subtotal revenues 800 54 160 (640) 19.94%
Expenditures
Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,200) 54 160 (500,640)
Beginning fund balance 504,020 504,020
Ending fund balance 4,820 504,180
#123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 1,300 103 354 (946) 27.23%
Interfund Transfer -#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/01
Total revenues 1,300 103 354 (946) 27.23%
Expenditures
Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 51,357 205,428 410,856 33.33%
Total expenditures 616,284 51,357 205,428 410,856 33.33%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (614,984) (51,254) (205,074) (411,802)
Beginning fund balance 1,174,070 1,174,070
Ending fund balance 559,086 968,996
Page 9
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual
April
Actual thru Budget
ApriI 30 Remaining
% of
Budget
#204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND
Revenues
Spokane Public Facilities District 373,800 0 0 (373,800) 0.00%
Interfund Transfer -in -#301 82,150 6,846 27,383 (54,767) 33.33%
Interfund Transfer -in - #302 82,150 6,846 27,383 (54,767) 33.33%
Total revenues 538,100 13,692 54,767 (483,333) 10.18%
Expenditures
Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 373,800 0 (38,022) 411,822 -10.17%
Debt Service Payments - Roads 164,300 0 (14,297) 178,597 -8.70%
Total expenditures 538,100 0 (52,319) 590,419 -9.72%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 13,692 107,086 (1,073,752)
Beginning fund balance 4,049 4,049
Ending fund balance 4,049 111,135
Page 10
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015 Al
Budget
Actual
April
Actual thru Budget
April 30 Remaining
% of
Budget
#301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 1 - Taxes 625,000 82,983 196,207 (428,793) 31.39%
Investment Interest 1,000 98 286 (714) 28.56%
Total revenues
Expenditures
Interfund Transfer -out - #204 82,150 6,846 27,383 54,767 33.33%
Interfund Transfer -out -#303 221,980 0 144 221,836 0.06%
Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement presen. 251,049 0 0 251,049 0.00%
Total expenditures 555,179 6,846 27,527 527,652 4.96%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 70,821 76,235 168,966 (957,159)
Beginning fund balance 1,426,957 1,426,957
Ending fund balance 1,497,778 1,595,923
626,000 83,081 196,493 (429,507) 31.39%
#302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
REET 2 - Taxes 625,000 82,885 169,309 (455,691) 27.09%
Investment Interest 1,000 108 318 (682) 31.82%
Total revenues 626,000 82,993 169,628 (456,372) 27.10%
Expenditures
Interfund Transfer -out - #204 82,150 6,846 27,383 54,767 33.33%
Interfund Transfer -out - #303 365,290 0 7,338 357,952 2.01 %
Interfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement presen. 251,049 0 0 251,049 0.00%
Total expenditures 698,489 6,846 34,721 663,768 4.97%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (72,489) 76,147 134,907 (1,120,140)
Beginning fund balance 1,325,144 1,325,144
Ending fund balance 1,252,655 1,460,051
Page 11
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
#303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 8,714,114 0 545,945 (8,168,169) 6.27%
Developer Contribution 94,860 0 103,650 8,790 109.27%
Miscellaneous 0 0 50 50 #DIV/0!
Transfer -in - #301 221,980 0 144 (221,836) 0.06%
Transfer -in - #302 365,290 0 7,338 (357,952) 2.01%
Transfer -in -#312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 2,120,000 0 0 (2,120,000) 0.00%
Transfer -in -#402 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Investment Interest 0 2 7 7 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 11,516,244 2 657,135 (10,859,109) 5.71%
Expenditures
060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 602,196 4,890 8,311 593,885 1.38%
123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 355,376 6,306 23,721 331,655 6.67%
141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 35,052 275 3,381 31,671 9.65%
142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0 105 105 (105) #DIV/0!
149 Sidewalk Infill 0 3,732 4,243 (4,243) #DIV/0!
155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 7,201,779 662,013 810,091 6,391,688 11.25%
156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 570,480 9,658 50,487 519,993 8.85%
159 University Rd /1-90 Overpass Study 0 2,075 2,075 (2,075) #DIV/0!
166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 556,137 28,673 38,880 517,257 6.99%
167 Citywide Safety Improvements 320,560 3,423 17,522 303,038 5.47%
191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 0 0 190 (190) #DIV/0!
196 8th Avenue - McKinnon to Fancher 0 0 396 (396) #DIV/0!
201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 301,357 762 1,829 299,528 0.61%
205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 0 823 5,723 (5,723) #DIV/0!
206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 246,231 7,700 21,234 224,997 8.62%
207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access 70,014 0 0 70,014 0.00%
211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 151,576 288 1,251 150,325 0.83%
Right of Way Acquisition 105,486 0 0 105,486 0.00%
Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 11,516,244 730,723 989,439 10,526,805
Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (730,721) (332,304) (21,385,914)
Beginning fund balance 72,930 72,930
Ending fund balance 72,930 (259,374)
Page 12
8.59%
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April ApriI 30 Remaining Budget
#309 - PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Interfund Transfer -in - #001 100,000 8,333 33,333 (66,667) 33.33%
Investment Interest 500 53 156 (344) 31.12%
Total revenues 100,500 8,386 33,489 (67,011) 33.32%
Expenditures
176 Appleway Trail 0 152,996 257,619 (257,619) #DIV/0!
203 Browns Park Volleyball Courts 490,650 0 6,637 484,013 1.35%
208 Old Mission Trailhead Parking Improvements 0 0 68 (68) #DIV/0!
212 Edgecliff Park Restroom Sewer Project 0 0 (6,923) 6,923 #DIV/0!
217 Edgecliff picnic shelter 0 954 2,454 (2,454) #DIV/0!
Total expenditures 490,650 153,950 259,855 230,795 52.96%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (390,150) (145,564) (226,366) (297,806)
Beginning fund balance 451,720 451,720
Ending fund balance 61,570 225,354
Page 13
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
#310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 1,200 142 418 (782) 34.81%
Interfund Transfer -in -#001 339,300 28,275 113,100 (226,200) 33.33%
Total revenues
Expenditures
Land for City Hall
Total expenditures
340,500 28,417 113,518 (226,982) 33.34%
0
0 1,128,118 (1,128,118) #DIV/0!
0
0 1,128,118 (1,128,118) #DIV/0!
Revenues over (under) expenditures 340,500 28,417 (1,014,600) 901,136
Beginning fund balance 1,919,550 1,919,550
Ending fund balance 2,260,050 904,950
Note: The fund balance includes $839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed
in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City will repurchase this land at the original sale price of $839,285.10.
#311 - STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+
Revenues
Interfund Transfers in- #101 206,618 17,218 68,873 (137,745) 33.33%
Interfund Transfers in -#123 616,284 51,357 205,428 (410,856) 33.33%
Interfund Transfers in -#301 251,049 0 0 (251,049) 0.00%
Interfund Transfers in -#302 251,049 0 0 (251,049) 0.00%
Interfund Transfers in- #001 920,000 76,667 306,667 (613,333) 33.33%
Grant Proceeds 971,032 13,804 63,508 (907,524) 6.54%
Investment Interest 0 220 649 649 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 3,216,032 159,266 645,125 (2,570,907) 20.06%
Expenditures
Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 100.00%
Pavement Preservation 2,565,050 0 0 2,565,050 100.00%
179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 0 1,499 2,718 (2,718) #DIV/0!
180 2013 Street Preservation Ph3 0 0 209 (209) #DIV/0!
186 Adams Road Resurfacing 0 0 388 (388) #DIV/0!
187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 460 687 (687) #DIV/0!
188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 0 3,686 11,063 (11,063) #DIV/0!
202 Appleway Street Preservation Project 0 0 226 (226) #DIV/0!
211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 630 3,425 (3,425) #DIV/0!
218 Montgomery Ave Street Preservation 0 1,221 7,551 (7,551) #DIV/0!
220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell Street Preservation 0 5,379 13,896 (13,896) #DIV/0!
Total expenditures 2,615,050 12,875 40,163 2,574,887 1.54%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 600,982 146,391 604,962 (5,145,794)
Beginning fund balance 1,922,013 1,922,013
Ending fund balance 2,522,995 2,526,975
#312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND
Revenues
Transfers in - #001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Developer Contribution 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Expenditures
Transfers out - #303 - Sullivan Rd W Bridge 2,120,000 0 0 2,120,000 0.00%
Total expenditures 2,120,000 0 0 2,120,000 0.00%
Revenues over (under) expenditures (2,120,000) 0 0 (2,120,000)
Beginning fund balance 8,581,715 8,581,715
Ending fund balance 6,461,715 8,581,715
Page 14
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
ENTERPRISE FUNDS
#402 - STORMWATER FUND
RECURRING ACTIVITY
Budget Year
Elapsed =
33.3%
2015 1
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
Revenues
Stormwater Management Fees 1,880,000 113,598 142,391 (1,737,609) 7.57%
Investment Interest 1,500 159 470 (1,030) 31.33%
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total Recurring Revenues 1,881,500 113,757 142,861 (1,738,639) 7.59%
Expenditures
Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 488,101 34,327 128,959 359,142 26.42%
Supplies 15,900 331 859 15,041 5.40%
Services & Charges 1,097,468 124,754 181,583 915,885 16.55%
Intergovernmental Payments 27,000 0 14,091 12,909 52.19%
Interfund Transfers -out -#001 13,400 1,117 4,467 8,933 33.34%
Total Recurring Expenditures 1,641,869 160,529 329,959 1,311,910 20.10%
Recurring Revenues Over (Under)
Recurring Expenditures 239,631 (46,771) (187,098) (426,729)
NONRECURRING ACTIVITY
Revenues
Grant Proceeds 0 48,662 212,670 212,670 #DIV/0!
Interfund Transfers -in 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 48,662 212,670 212,670 #DIV/0!
Expenditures
Capital - various projects 600,000 0 0 600,000 0.00%
VMS Trailer 16,000 0 0 16,000 0.00%
193 Effectiveness Study 0 79,641 99,220 (99,220) #DIV/0!
198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0 0 10,453 (10,453) #DIV/0!
199 Havana - Yale Diversion 0 0 4,887 (4,887) #DIV/01
200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0 0 3,540 (3,540) #DIV/0!
Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 616,000 79,641 118,100 497,900 19.17%
Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under)
Nonrecurring Expenditures (616,000) (30,979) 94,570 710,570
Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues
Over (Under) Total Expenditures (376,369) (77,750) (92,528) 283,841
Beginning working capital 1,933,564 1,933,564
Ending working capital 1,557,195 1,841,036
Page 15
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
ENTERPRISE FUNDS - continued
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
#403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Revenues
Spokane County 500,000 0 0 (500,000) 0.00%
Grant DOE - Decant Facility 1,260,000 0 83,813 (1,176,187) 6.65%
Grant revenue 0 3,534 563,665 563,665 #DIV/0!
Total revenues 1,760,000 3,534 647,478 (1,112,522) 36.79%
Expenditures
197 Broadway SD retrofit 1,200,000 3,279 12,933 1,187,067 1.08%
Total expenditures 1,200,000 3,279 12,933 1,187,067 1.08%
Revenues over (under) expenditures 560,000 255 634,545 (2,299,589)
Beginning working capital 1,773 1,773
Ending working capital 561,773 636,318
Page 16
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
#501 - ER&R FUND
Revenues
Transfer -in - #001
Transfer -in - #101
Transfer -in - #402
Investment Interest
Total revenues
Expenditures
Vehicle Acquisitions
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
Budget Year
Elapsed =
2015
33.3%
2015
Budget
Actual Actual thru Budget % of
April April 30 Remaining Budget
19,300 1,608 6,433 (12,867) 33.33%
12,077 1,006 4,026 (8,051) 33.33%
4,167 347 1,389 (2,778) 33.33%
1,000 94 277 (723) 27.70%
36,544 3,056 12,125 (24,419) 33.18%
30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00%
6,544
1,235,794
3,056
12,125
1,235,794
1,242,338 1,247,919
(54,419)
#502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Revenues
Investment Interest 0 1 2 2 #DIV/0!
Interfund Transfer - #001 (UE Claims) 0 38 38 38 #DIV/0!
Interfund Transfer -#001 325,000 27,083 108,333 (216,667) 33.33%
Total revenues 325,000 27,122 108,373 (216,627) 33.35%
Expenditures
Auto & Property Insurance 325,000 0 284,112 40,888 87.42%
Unemployment Claims 0 4,202 4,202 (4,202) #DIV/0!
Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
Total expenditures
Revenues over (under) expenditures
Beginning working capital
Ending working capital
325,000 4,202 288,314 36,686 88.71%
0 22,920 (179,941) (253,313)
168,209 168,209
168,209
(11,732)
SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS
Total of Revenues for all Funds 64,500,020 3,478,837 11,348,350
Per revenue status report 64,500,020 3,478,837 11,348,350
Difference 0 (0) (0)
Total of Expenditures for all Funds
Per expenditure status report
68,660,147 4,597,341 15,533,585
68,660,147 4,597,341 15,533,585
0 0 (0)
Total Capital expenditures (included in
total expenditures)
17,632,944 1,061,130 2,656,433
Page 17
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Investment Report
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
Beginning
Deposits
Withdrawls
Interest
Ending
001 General Fund
101 Street Fund
103 Trails & Paths
105 Hotel/Motel
120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve
121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve
122 Winter Weather Reserve
123 Civic Facilities Replacement
301 Capital Projects
302 Special Capital Projects
303 Street Capital Projects Fund
304 Mirabeau Point Project
307 Capital Grants Fund
309 Parks Capital Project
310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects
311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+
312 Capital Reserve Fund
402 Stormwater Management
403 Aquifer Protection Fund
501 Equipment Rental & Replacement
502 Risk Management
*Local Government Investment Pool
5/13/2014
$ 43,240,969.26 $ 3,069,930A9 $ 2,002,504.13 $ 48,313,403.58
1,713,206.89 0.00 0.00 1,713,206.89
(2,700,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,700,000.00)
5,080.57 0.00 0.00 5,080.57
$ 42,259,256.72 $ 3,069,930.19 $ 2,002,504.13 $ 47,331,691.04
matures: 6/28/2015 11/4/2015
rate: 0.35%
0.50%
ilirlillt
A Current Period
Year to date
Budge
$ 29,777,300.82 $ 3,228.48 $ 9,593.79 $ 65,000.00
2,120,293.29 227.59 651.49 3,000.00
39,858.66 4.28 12.38 0.00
264,280.89 28.37 104.59 300.00
300, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5,196, 055.28 557.74 1,644.59 7,300.00
504, 009.54 54.10 159.52 700.00
963, 074.56 103.38 353.99 1,700.00
910,158.29 97.70 285.60 1,000.00
1, 005, 501.25 107.93 318.24 1,000.00
22, 871.47 2.46 7.25 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
491,637.85 52.77 155.61 500.00
1, 319, 738.03 141.66 417.71 1,900.00
2,050,455.93 220.10 648.99 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,484,852.03 159.38 469.96 2,500.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
876,497.44 94.08 277.42 1,000.00
5,105.71 0.55 1.62 0.00
$ 47,331,691.04 $ 5,080.57 $ 15,102.75 $ 85,900.00
Page 18
Total
LGIP*
BB CD 2
BB CD 3
Investments
$ 43,240,969.26 $ 3,069,930A9 $ 2,002,504.13 $ 48,313,403.58
1,713,206.89 0.00 0.00 1,713,206.89
(2,700,000.00) 0.00 0.00 (2,700,000.00)
5,080.57 0.00 0.00 5,080.57
$ 42,259,256.72 $ 3,069,930.19 $ 2,002,504.13 $ 47,331,691.04
matures: 6/28/2015 11/4/2015
rate: 0.35%
0.50%
ilirlillt
A Current Period
Year to date
Budge
$ 29,777,300.82 $ 3,228.48 $ 9,593.79 $ 65,000.00
2,120,293.29 227.59 651.49 3,000.00
39,858.66 4.28 12.38 0.00
264,280.89 28.37 104.59 300.00
300, 000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5,196, 055.28 557.74 1,644.59 7,300.00
504, 009.54 54.10 159.52 700.00
963, 074.56 103.38 353.99 1,700.00
910,158.29 97.70 285.60 1,000.00
1, 005, 501.25 107.93 318.24 1,000.00
22, 871.47 2.46 7.25 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
491,637.85 52.77 155.61 500.00
1, 319, 738.03 141.66 417.71 1,900.00
2,050,455.93 220.10 648.99 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1,484,852.03 159.38 469.96 2,500.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
876,497.44 94.08 277.42 1,000.00
5,105.71 0.55 1.62 0.00
$ 47,331,691.04 $ 5,080.57 $ 15,102.75 $ 85,900.00
Page 18
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 04 30.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Sales Tax Receipts
For the Four -Month Period Ended April 30, 2015
5/13/2015
Month Difference
Received 2014 i 2015, $
February 1,891,031.43 1,962,820.56 71,789.13
March 1,324,975.84 1,358,307.78 33,331.94
April 1,357,736.39 1,401,618.35 43,881.96
3.80%
2.52%
3.23%
4,573,743.66 4,722,746.69 149,003.03 3.26%
May 1,636,894.4
June 1,579,545.34
July 1,653,343.86
August 1,751,296.73
September 1,772,033.14
October 1,754,039.63
November 1,802,029.08
December 1,619,010.52
January 1,565,739.35
19,707,675.75 4,722,746.69
Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice
sales tax and public safety tax.
The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane
Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the
vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to
the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to
the agencies is as follows:
- State of Washington 6.50%
- City of Spokane Valley 0.85%
- Spokane County 0.15%
- Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% *
- Crminial Justice 0.10% *
- Public Safety 0.10% * 2.20% local tax
- Juvenile Jail 0.10% *
- Mental Health 0.10% *
- Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% *
- Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% *
8.70%
* Indicates voter approved sales taxes
In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of
the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is
computed as follows:
Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County.
Public Safety The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the
State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder
allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County.
Page 19
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Sales Tax Collections - March
For the years 2006 through 2015
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2015\sales tax collections 2015.xlsx
2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 j 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015
January 1,572,609 1,759,531 1,729,680 1,484,350 1,491,059 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887
February 1,068,743 1,155,947 1,129,765 1,098,575 963,749 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640
March 1,072,330 1,196,575 1,219,611 1,068,811 1,018,468 1,015,762 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991
1,732,299
1,197,323
1,235,252
4/28/2015
2015 to 2014
Difference
54,412 3.24%
26,683 2.28%
33,261 2.77%
Collected to date 3,713,682 4,112,053 4,079,056 3,651,736 3,473,276 3,466,467 3,667,009 3,953,102 4,050,518 4,164,874 114,356 2.82%
April 1,371,030 1,479,603 1,423,459 1,134,552 1,184,137 1,284,180 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 0
May 1,392,111 1,353,013 1,243,259 1,098,054 1,102,523 1,187,737 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 0
June 1,362,737 1,428,868 1,386,908 1,151,772 1,123,907 1,248,218 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 0
July 1,555,124 1,579,586 1,519,846 1,309,401 1,260,873 1,332,834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 0
August 1,405,983 1,516,324 1,377,943 1,212,531 1,211,450 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 0
September 1,487,155 1,546,705 1,364,963 1,227,813 1,191,558 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 0
October 1,526,910 1,601,038 1,344,217 1,236,493 1,269,505 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 0
November 1,369,940 1,443,843 1,292,327 1,155,647 1,139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 0
December 1,366,281 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1,141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383,596 0
Total Collections 16,550,953 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 4,164,874
Budget Estimate 16,002,000 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400
Actual over (under) budg 548,953 (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 (13,463,526)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% n/a
% change in annual
total collected 10.02% 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% n/a
% of budget collected
through March
23.21% 23.54% 23.83% 20.45% 24.10% 24.39% 25.81% 25.92% 23.84% 23.63%
% of actual total collected
through March
22.44% 23.58% 25.24% 25.63% 24.64% 23.34% 23.77% 23.83% 23.23% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March
March
4,500,000
4,000,000
3,500,000
3,000,000III
2,500,000
2,000,000
1,500,000
March
�- -
■
._
,
■ February
■January
1,000,000
500,000
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Page 20
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through -
Actual for the years 2006 through 2015
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2015\105 hotel motel tax 2015.xlsx
4
2006 1 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015
January 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,946.96 23,280.21 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 24,184.84
February 20,946.09 25,310.66 24,623.06 23,283.95 23,416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 25,974.98
March 24,308.48 29,190.35 27,509.99 25,272.02 24,232.35 24,611.28 25,654.64 27,738.65
25,425.40 27,092.20
26,013.62 27,111.00
29,383.93 32,998.14
4128/221
2015 to 2014
Difference
$ 96
1,667 6.56%
1,097 4.22%
3,614 12.30%
Total Collections 65,908.06 79,638.93 81,080.01 71,836.18 70,356.25 69,615.63 68,645.78 77,898.47 80,822.95 87,201.34 6,378.39 7.89%
April 34,371.82 37,950.53 40,406.02 36,253.63 39,463.49 38,230.49 52,130.37 40,979.25 48,245.81 0.00
May 32,522.06 31,371.01 36,828.53 32,588.80 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 40,560.41 41,122.66 0.00
June 34,256.71 36,267.07 46,659.88 40,414.59 39,935.36 41,403.41 43,970.70 47,850.15 52,617.63 0.00
July 49,744.62 56,281.99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.60 56,157.26 61,514.48 0.00
August 45,916.16 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,229.23 63,816.45 70,383.93 0.00
September 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 70,794.09 76,099.59 0.00
October 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 43,835.57 45,604.07 0.00
November 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 42,542.13 39,600.06 0.00
December 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 34,238.37 33,256.28 0.00
Total Collections 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 518,672.15 549,267.46 87,201.34
Budget Estimate 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 490,000.00 530,000.00 510,000.00
Actual over (under) budg 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 28,672.15 19,267.46 (422,798.66)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% n/a
% change in annual
total collected 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% n/a
% of budget collected
through March
% of actual total collected
through March
18.83% 19.91% 20.27% 14.03% 18.51% 14.50% 15.96% 15.90% 15.25% 17.10%
15.80% 17.25% 17.36% 16.94% 15.69% 15.21% 14.01% 15.02% 14.71% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of
March
March
100,000.00
90,000.00
-
-
-
March
• February
r --
80,000.00
70,000.00
60,000.00
Y.
50,000.00
40,000.00
January
30,000.00
_
20,000.00
10,000.00
0.00
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Page 21
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
1st and 2nd 1/4% REET Collections through March
Actual for the years 2006 through 2015
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2015\301 and 302 REET for 2015.xlsx
2006 1 2007
1
2008
1
2009
1
2010 1 2011
1
2012
1
2013 1 2014 1 2015
January 243,894.16
February 172,154.72
March 182,065.71
228,896.76
129,919.79
263,834.60
145,963.47
159,503.34
133,513.35
55,281.25
45,180.53
73,306.86
59,887.08
64,121.61
86,204.41
64,128.13
36,443.36
95,879.78
46,358.75
56,114.56
71,729.67
56,898.40
155,226.07
72,171.53
61,191.55
67,048.50
81,723.70
96,140.79
103,507.94
165,867.91
4/29/2015
2015 to 2014
Difference
34,949 57.11%
36,459 54.38%
84,144 102.96%
Collected to date 598,114.59 622,651.15 438,980.16 173,768.64 210,213.10 196,451.27 174,202.98 284,296.00 209,963.75 365,516.64 155,552.89 74.09%
April 173,796.61 211,787.08 128,366.69 81,155.83 99,507.19 79,681.38 86,537.14 90,376.91 105,448.15 0.00
May 306,871.66 222,677.17 158,506.43 77,463.58 109,624.89 124,691.60 111,627.22 116,164.91 198,869.74 0.00
June 226,526.64 257,477.05 178,202.98 105,020.98 105,680.28 81,579.34 124,976.28 139,112.11 106,675.77 0.00
July 2,104.30 323,945.47 217,942.98 122,530.36 84,834.48 79,629.06 101,048.69 128,921.02 208,199.38 0.00
August 451,700.06 208,039.87 133,905.93 115,829.68 72,630.27 129,472.44 106,517.19 117,149.90 172,536.46 0.00
September 188,066.23 165,287.21 131,240.36 93,862.17 75,812.10 68,019.83 63,516.73 174,070.25 152,322.59 0.00
October 211,091.20 206,442.92 355,655.60 113,960.52 93,256.02 61,396.23 238,094.79 117,805.76 123,504.75 0.00
November 141,729.09 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 78,324.02 172,226.74 0.00
December 161,285.23 179,567.77 96,086.00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077.29 74,299.65 75,429.19 117,681.62 0.00
Total distributed by Spokane County 2,461,285.61 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185,706.66 1,321,650.07 1,567,428.95 365,516.64
Budget estimate 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
Actual over(under) budget 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 321,650.07 367,428.95 (834,483.36)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 123.06% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% 130.62% n/a
% change in annual
total collected
% of budget collected
through March
% of actual total collected
through March
(1.19%) 5.22% (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% n/a
29.91% 31.13% 21.95% 8.69% 27.66% 24.56% 18.34% 28.43% 17.50% 30.46%
24.30% 24.04% 22.10% 15.97% 21.84% 20.45% 14.69% 21.51% 13.40% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March
r
700,000.00
600,000.00
500,000.00
400,000.00
300,000.00
200,000.00
100,000.00
0.00
22
March
March
,iFebruary
January
2006 2007 2008 2009
2010 2011
2012 2013 2014 2015
22
H:\Finance Activity Reports\2015\debt capacity.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Debt Capacity
2/8/2015
2014 Assessed Value for 2015 Property Taxes
Voted (UTGO)
Nonvoted (LTGO)
Voted park
Voted utility
1.00% of assessed value
1.50% of assessed value
2.50% of assessed value
2.50% of assessed value
7, 393, 971, 582
Maximum
Debt
Capacity
Outstanding
as of
12/31/2014
Remaining
Debt
Capacity
Utilized
73,939,716
110,909,574
184,849,290
184,849,290
554,547,870
0
6,675,000
0
0
6,675,000
73,939,716
104,234,574
184,849,290
184, 849,290
547,872,870
7I
0.00%
6.02%
0.00%
0.00%
1.20%
2014 LTGO Bonds
Period
Ending
CenterPlace
Road & I
Street
Improvements
Total
Bonds
Repaid
Bonds
Remaining -
12/1/2014
12/1/2015
12/1/2016
12/1/2017
12/1/2018
12/1/2019
12/1/2020
12/1/2021
12/1/2022
12/1/2023
12/1/2024
12/1/2025
12/1/2026
12/1/2027
12/1/2028
12/1/2029
12/1/2030
12/1/2031
12/1/2032
12/1/2033
225,000
135,006
360,000
225,000
135,00
360,000
175,000
185,000
190,000
230,000
255,000
290,000
320,000
350,000
390,000
430,000
465,000
505,000
395,000
300,000
245,000
225,000
180,000
130,000
165,000
125,000
130,000
130,000
135,000
140,000
140,000
145,000
150,000
155,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300,000
315,000
320,000
365,000
395,000
430,000
465,000
500,000
545,000
430,000
465,000
505,000
395,000
300,000
245,000
225,000
180,000
130,000
165,000
5,425, 000
1,250,000
6,675,000
5,650,000
1,385,000
7,035,000
Page 23
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT\2015\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2015.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - March
For the years 2006 through 2015
2006 1 2007 j 2008 1 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015
January 157,910 172,711
February 145,663 162,079
March 144,867 156,194
165,698
149,799
159,316
133,304
155,832
146,264
161,298
145,869
140,486
154,792
146,353
141,849
159,607
135,208
144,297
146,145
145,998
135,695
152,906
148,118
131,247
152,598
145,455
140,999
408/2015
2015 to 2014
Difference
(308) (0.20%)
(2,663) (1.80%)
9,752 7.43%
Collected to date 448,440 490,984 474,813 435,400 447,653 442,994 439,112 427,838 432,271 439,052 6,781 1.57%
April 158,729 175,010 165,574 161,117 161,721 165,019 153,546 156,529 156,269 0
May 152,049 173,475 162,281 156,109 158,119 154,700 144,670 151,595 156,850 0
June 166,506 183,410 176,085 173,954 168,146 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 0
July 162,989 178,857 166,823 169,756 164,221 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 0
August 183,127 183,815 171,690 179,012 176,869 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 0
September 187,645 191,884 176,912 175,965 175,067 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 0
October 178,782 180,570 165,842 163,644 164,475 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 0
November 177,726 181,764 193,360 167,340 168,477 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 0
December 159,974 159,750 142,230 144,376 143,257 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 0
Total Collections 1,975,967 2,099,519 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 439,052
Budget Estimate 1,753,000 2,000,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,897,800 1,861,100 1,858,600 1,858,600
Actual over (under) budg 222,967 99,519 (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (50,810) 6,953 19,875 (1,419,548)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 112.72% 104.98% 92.82% 93.98% 101.47% 99.08% 97.32% 100.37% 101.07% n/a
% change in annual
total collected 9.57% 6.25% (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% n/a
% of budget collected
through March 25.58% 24.55% 22.08% 21.24% 23.56% 23.63% 23.14% 22.99% 23.26% 23.62%
% of actual total collected
through March 22.69% 23.39% 23.79% 22.60% 23.22% 23.85% 23.77% 22.90% 23.01% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
March
2006
2007 2008
2009 2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
March
February
January
Page 24
P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2015\telephone utility tax collections 2015.xlsx
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA
Telephone Utility Tax Collections - March
For the years 2009 through 2015
2009 1 2010 1 2011
1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1 2015
January 128,354 234,622
February 282,773 266,041
March 230,721 264,175
241,357
230,366
245,539
193,818
261,074
234,113
217,478
216,552
223,884
210,777
205,953
208,206
177,948
212,845
174,738
5/8/2015
2015 to 2014
Difference
(6,701) (3.08%)
(10,599) (4.89%)
(15,678) (7.00%)
Collected to date 641,848 764,838 717,262 689,005 657,914 624,936 565,531 (32,978) (5.01%)
April 275,775 254,984 238,561 229,565 214,618 206,038 0
May 242,115 255,056 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 0
June 239,334 251,880 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 0
July 269,631 250,593 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 0
August 260,408 246,261 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 0
September 249,380 240,111 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 0
October 252,388 238,500 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 0
November 254,819 247,848 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 0
December 368,775 236,065 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 0
Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 565,531
Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100
Actual over (under) budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (1,999,569)
Total actual collections
as a % of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% n/a
% change in annual
total collected n/a (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) n/a
% of budget collected
through March 25.67% 27.32% 23.91% 22.97% 22.69% 22.72% 22.05%
% of actual total collected
through March
21.01% 25.61% 24.06% 25.19% 25.67% 25.39% n/a
Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of March
900,000
800,000
700,000
600,000
500,000
400,000
300,000
200,000
100,000
0
March
2009
2010
2011
2012 2013
2014
2015
March
February
January
Page 25
Rick VanLeuven
Chief of Police
Spokane Valley Police Department
Accredited Since 2011
Services provided in partnership with
the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community,
Dedicated to Your Safety.
Ozzie Knezovich
Sheriff
TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager
FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police
DATE: May 26, 2015
RE: Monthly Report April 2015
April 2015:
April 2014:
CAD incidents: 4,972 CAD incidents: 4,698
Reports taken: 1,671 Reports taken: 1,725
Traffic stops: 1,245 Traffic stops: 1,013
Traffic reports: 277 Traffic reports: 220
CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self -initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are
attached showing April residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen
vehicles. Also attached are trend -line graphs for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015: Citations, Spokane
Valley Dispatched Calls, Self -Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex
Crimes.
Also included is the April Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred
in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For example, an
individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in
the Newman Lake area to make a report.
In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken
down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing
certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not recommended using the graphs. The
crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes that should not be compared to prior
graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft.
ADMINISTRATIVE:
Chief VanLeuven took advantage of the beautiful weather in April and was out riding the new
Appleway Trail a couple of times between meetings, stopping to make numerous positive citizen
contacts. With the bikes up and ready and the weather improving, look for deputies to be out
conducting patrols on both the Centennial Trail as well as the new Appleway Trail.
Page 1
The month started out with Washington's 2015 Distracted Driving
Enforcement Campaign kick-off at the Public Works Building. Spokane
Valley Police along with more than 100 law enforcement agencies across
the state participated in overtime patrols from April 1st through the 15tH
focusing on drivers using their cell phones while behind the wheel. Chief
VanLeuven attended this kick-off along with other law enforcement
officials and members of the Traffic Safety Commission. Jim and Lisa
Thompson unveiled a road sign that will be erected later in the spring at
the site near Colfax where their son, Sam, died when he crossed the
center line while texting and driving.
Chief VanLeuven traveled to Pullman's WSU Campus in early April
regarding WSU's development of a portable THC testing device. WSU
has been working with State legislators to provide funding to continue this project, and law
enforcement had the opportunity to demonstrate their support for the program and our working
relationship with WSU. To date, in Spokane Valley alone, deputies have made 25 DUI arrests based
on the suspect being under the influence of THC from marijuana. (This does not take into account
those who were consuming alcohol AND marijuana, and who met the legal limit for a DUI based on
their alcohol consumption alone.)
Chief VanLeuven attended a Critical Infrastructure Seminar in early April at Northern Quest. The
seminar provided information on critical infrastructure, partnerships/information sharing, programs,
and planning Speakers covered not only information locally, but also discussed regional intelligence
and state emergency management.
Mid -April brought a four-day Enhanced Crisis Intervention Team (ECIT) Training, which Chief
VanLeuven attended. A wide range of topics was discussed, from active shooter scenarios, to
persons with mental health in crisis. Attendees not only listened to speakers on various topics, but
were also given time for round -table discussions and application of what was learned.
In mid-April, Chief VanLeuven attended the Professional Mortgage Women's Luncheon at The
Onion, where he spoke about crime trends, personal safety, and answered questions from the group.
Chief VanLeuven along with others from the Spokane County Sheriff's Office attended the
Salvation Army's Appreciation Reception/Dinner.
Mid -April brought the Communications Appreciation Week for local law enforcement and a
barbecue was hosted in honor of those working in our Combined Communications Unit. These
individuals do a great job taking calls from citizens and, when needed, dispatching law enforcement
to the incident. What can be a very high stress job is made to look easy by the individuals who work
in our Communications Unit. Great job!
Late March provided an opportunity for Chief VanLeuven along with others in the community to
attend a half-day Executive Education Seminar on homeland security. The Center for Homeland
Defense and Security developed a multimedia scenario -based seminar to explore Spokane's
homeland security risks and challenges, designed to strengthen our capability to plan for, prevent,
respond to and recover from catastrophic events and terrorism.
Page 2
Chief VanLeuven also attended monthly meetings such as the Joint Leadership Forum Meeting, the
Law & Justice Council Meeting, Civil Service Meeting, the meeting of the Inland Northwest Law
Enforcement Leadership Group, in addition to In -Service Training at the end of April.
SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE):
S.C.O.P.E. brought in 14 new volunteers this month. We also received 500+ bike helmets purchased
by the City of Spokane Valley. The helmets are given out and volunteers fit them for kids and adults
as an injury prevention and safety program.
The Spokane County Sheriff's Office and S.C.O.P.E. said farewell to a long-time volunteer in mid-
April. Hal Halvorson was a senior volunteer who could be found manning the Sheriff's desk at the
Public Safety Building Monday through Thursday. Hal retired from Western Utilities in 1997, and
shortly thereafter volunteered with S.C.O.P.E. for approximately 15 years. He always gave those at
the front desk a friendly face and was frequently called upon by many in the Sheriff's Office to
answer questions when no one else knew the answer. He was the recipient of the Sheriff's Star in
two separate years, and most recently was awarded the 2014 Volunteer of the Year Award for
Central Valley S.C.O.P.E. Station. Hal was 86 years young when he passed away on April 9th.
S.C.O.P.E. Participated In:
• Senior Resource Fair at CenterPlace
• GSSAC Drug Endangered Children Open
House
• Community Meeting at Sunrise Elementary
• S.C.O.P.E. Basic Training
• Opportunity Elementary Bike Safety
Training
• GoodGuides Mentoring WVHS
• "Walking School Bus" Seth Woodard
Elementary
• Security Awareness Training
• East Valley Community Coalition Meeting
• Crime Stoppers Meeting
• GSSAC Coalition Meeting
• Operation Family ID
April 2015 Volunteers Hours per Station
*Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover
both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county.
Location
# Volunteers
Admin Hours
L.E. Hours
Total Hours
Central Valley
5
236.0
30.5
266.5
East Valley*
22
237.0
230.0
467.0
Edgecliff
26
604.0
48.0
652.0
Trentwood
5
169.5
41.0
210.5
University
23
512.5
404.0
916.5
West Valley*
28
689.0
0.0
689.0
TOTALS
109
2,448.0
753.5
3,201.5
Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $69,216.43 for April 2015
Page 3
Spokane Valley Graffiti Report
TRAINING HOURS
2012
2013
2014
2015
Jan.
0
2
3
5
Feb.
0
7
16
8
March
2
13
11
7
April
14
9
30
14
May
16
4
4
June
15
9
13
July
41
7
12
Aug.
57
22
6
Sept.
26
4
12
Oct.
30
7
6
Nov.
19
7
2
Dec.
37
1
7
Total
257
92
97
34
S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 94 on -scene hours (including
travel time) in April, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic
control. Of those hours, 52 hours were for incidents inside Spokane Valley. There was one Special
Event in Spokane Valley, Ponderosa Run in April, for two hours. Total April volunteer hours
contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 498; year-to-date
total is 1,885 hours.
Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in March
totaled 16 and in April 12 with 3 vehicles in March and 5 in April, respectively, eventually cited and
towed. Twenty hulks were processed in March and 5 hulks processed in April. During the month of
April, a total of 43 vehicles were processed; the total for 2015 to date is 244.
SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS
Page 4
TRAINING HOURS
SCSO
SVPD
TOTAL
January
0
18
48
66
February
0
26
42
68
March
0
22
43
65
April
0
30
27
57
YTD - TOTAL
0
96
160
256
Page 4
SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT
City of Spokane Valley
# of
Vol.
# of
Vol.
# of Hrs
# of Disabled
Infractions
Issued
# of
Warnings
Issued
# of Non -
Disabled
Infractions Issued
January
0
0
0
0
0
February
2
10
2
0
0
March
3
24
1
0
0
April
2
22
1
0
0
YTD Total
7
56
5
0
0
Spokane County
# of
Vol.
# of Hrs
# of Disabled
Infractions
Issued
# of
Warnings
Issued
# of Non -
Disabled
Infractions Issued
January
3
16.5
0
0
0
February
6
26.5
1
0
0
March
7
54
2
0
0
April
3
39
10
0
0
YTD Total
19
136
13
0
0
OPERATIONS:
Rent Money Stolen, Suspect Arrested — In early April, at about 3:30 p.m., Spokane Valley
deputies responded to a theft call at WinCo Foods on East Sprague. Deputies contacted the 50 -year-
old victim who said he and his female roommate were at the ATM machine to take out $500 for
rent. The victim said he had bad knees and asked his roommate to find a motorized cart for him to
use. The victim said while he was waiting at the ATM, he lost his balance and fell to the
ground. He said as he was struggling to stand up, a male reached over him and took the $500, all in
$20 bills, from the ATM. The victim said the male suspect walked away without saying anything.
The victim's roommate came back right after the incident with a motorized cart and told her what
had happened, providing a description of the male suspect. She went to look for the suspect in the
store and located him shopping in the store, at which time she confronted him about stealing the
money. She said the male suspect walked away from the cart and left the store. Both the victim and
his roommate saw the vehicle the suspect left in, which was a Ford Explorer, and provided the
license plate number to 911. At about 3:45 p.m., Deputy Cunningham located the male suspect
traveling westbound on Sprague near Fancher. Deputy Cunningham stopped the vehicle and
detained the male, with the assistance of Cpl. Welton. After placing handcuffs on the male suspect,
he told Deputy Cunningham the money was in his pants. The suspect shook his pant legs and a total
of $529 fell out of his pants. The suspect told deputies $29 of the money was his, which was later
confirmed by the victim. Deputy Nguyen brought the victim to the location of the traffic stop and he
positively identified the male suspect as the person who took his money. The money was returned to
the victim and the male suspect was cited and released for 3rd Degree Theft.
Page 5
Bicyclist Doesn't Evade Arrest — In mid-April 2015, just before midnight, Spokane Valley
Sheriff's Deputy Andrew Richmond attempted to stop a bicyclist for a traffic violation. Deputy
Richmond attempted to stop the 50 -year-old male suspect as he rode his bicycle on Mission, near
Harmony Lane, on the wrong side of the road (against traffic) in violation of Washington law. The
male turned and looked at the patrol car with the emergency lights activated and began to pedal
faster. With the siren activated in addition to the emergency lights, the male suspect continued his
attempt to flee. Deputy Richmond pulled in front of the bicycle, but the suspect rode past the patrol
vehicle, crossed Mission, and rode through the grass onto the sidewalk. Suddenly, the male suspect
stopped and tried to jump off the bicycle to flee on foot, but his leg became entangled with the bike
seat. As Deputy Richmond approached the suspect, he told him to show his hands and to get down
on the ground. The male suspect violently threw the bicycle to the ground and faced Deputy
Richmond as he reached toward his back waistband. Not knowing if the suspect was reaching for a
weapon, in addition to his refusal to follow commands, Deputy Richmond drew his weapon while he
continued to give commands. Appearing unfazed by this, the male suspect continued to reach
behind his back toward his waistband to retrieve a weapon or other unknown object. Calling for
immediate assistance, Deputy Richmond observed the male suspect turn away and throw a plastic
object toward a grassy area. The male then stated he was giving up and laid down on his stomach on
the ground. When additional deputies arrived, the male was taken into custody without further
incident. A plastic container was located next to a baggie containing a crystalline substance. The
substance in the bag was later field tested and showed a presumptive positive result for
Methamphetamine. The suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for
Possession of a Controlled Substance -Methamphetamine, Obstructing a Public Servant and for two
Domestic Violence Assault warrants.
$80,000 Truck Stolen From Business — In early April, at about 11:45 p.m., Spokane Valley Deputy
David Lawhorn responded to a business near the 4500 block of North Barker Road on a commercial
burglary call. Private security contacted law enforcement after finding a gate on the property that
had been rammed by a vehicle. It was unknown what time the burglary occurred and after an
employee arrived on scene, it was not certain if anything had been taken. The next day, Spokane
Valley Deputy Darin Schaum responded to the business. Employees had watched surveillance video
and determined an $80,000 Ford F-550 had been stolen. The suspects appeared to be male, both
heavy set and wearing hoodies. At this time, there is no further suspect information. Anyone with
any information is asked to call Crime Check at 509-456-2233.
Suspect Arrested for Bomb Threats, Investigation Continues - In late April 2015, Spokane
Valley Sheriff's Deputies arrested a suspect they believe is responsible for three of the recent bomb
threats made at University High School. Spokane Valley Sheriff's School Resource Deputy Jeff
Duncan arrested an 18 -year-old female student charging her with three felony counts of Threats to
Bomb or Injure Property, after a voluntary interview at the Spokane Valley Police
Department. Deputy Duncan, working with University High School and Central Valley School
District staff, developed information that the female suspect wrote the bomb threats in two female
bathrooms on April 13th, 14th and 20th causing the evacuation of the school twice. The school was
searched after each threat and no explosives were located. The female suspect, a student at the
school when the threats were made, was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for the
three felony charges. The investigation into the initial bomb threats received by email on April 1St
and 3rd continues. Although an apparent hoax, these threats are very serious. They posed a threat to
everyone at the school, disrupted school activities, worried parents and pulled law enforcement and
Page 6
first responders away from other calls for service. Sheriff Knezovich stated, "The safety of the
students is the priority of the Central Valley School District, Spokane Valley Police Department and
the Spokane County Sheriff's Office. It is this strong partnership and commitment to safety that led
to today's arrest. Threats like these will be thoroughly investigated and when the individual(s) are
located, they will be arrested and they will be prosecuted."
Suspect Arrested after Citizen Reports a "Suspicious Vehicle" — In late April 2015, at
approximately 7:45 a.m., while investigating a report of a suspicious vehicle, Spokane Valley
Sheriff's Deputy Ryan Smith arrested a 38 -year-old male for drug and stolen property
charges. Deputy Smith responded to the 2600 block of North Woodward in Spokane Valley after a
citizen reported a male sitting in a white GMC pickup for the last several hours. Deputy Smith
found the vehicle in the area. It was parked on the curb and the driver appeared to be sleeping. As
Deputy Smith approached, he observed an open, large metal Job Box tool chest in the bed of the
truck. He also noticed two large knives sitting on the dash, a large set of bolt cutters on the front
passenger side seat and the vehicle's ignition was severely damaged. The male suspect said he was
having problems with the lights and he couldn't continue to drive. He said he bought the Job Box
"from a guy," but he could not provide a name or specific information about the purchase. Deputy
Smith contacted the owner of the electrical company, whose name was clearly painted on the box,
and learned it had been stolen. The male suspect was arrested for possession of stolen property and
searched. Deputy Smith found a small plastic bag containing a crystalline substance in the suspect's
front pants pocket. The substance was later field tested which show a presumptive positive result for
methamphetamine. The owner of the electrical company arrived and positively identified the Job
Box. He reported it was stolen from a jobsite in the 12800 block of East Mirabeau over the weekend
and took possession of it. Deputy Smith spoke with the owner of the vehicle and learned the male
suspect had permission to use it. The male was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail
for Possession of a Controlled Substance -Methamphetamine and Possession of Stolen Property 3rd
Degree.
Crime Prevention Deputy Johnston - As the warmer weather approaches, more and more people
head outside to their favorite destinations. Spokane Valley Crime Prevention Deputy Chris Johnston
wants to remind everyone that there are some simple steps you can take
to protect yourself, your loved ones, and your property:
- Secure your home. Don't leave doors and windows open or
unlocked when you leave. Keep garage doors closed as much as
possible, as suspects have been known to enter open garages
undetected, even when people are home.
- Secure your vehicle. Lock all doors, and don't leave any
windows down for ventilation. ANY item left in view is a target
for a vehicle prowler, so take the time to remove valuables from
your vehicles' interior. If that's not possible, try to secure them
in the trunk or in an area out of view. Also, security systems are
a great deterrent.
- Secure yourself and others. The single most powerful set of personal safety tools you have
are your senses. Be vigilant, and watch what is going on around you. Don't be afraid to look
at other people, and pay attention to what is happening near you. If something seems
Page 7
suspicious, or just doesn't seem "right," report it! Program the number for Crime Check into
your phone so you have it available if you should happen to need it. The number is 456-2233.
As always, if you see a crime in progress or a potentially dangerous situation, call 911.
If you'd like more information about these or other crime prevention topics and strategies, please
contact Deputy Johnston directly at 389-2771. He would be happy to assist you with personal safety
training, a home or business security survey, or whatever your needs may be. Be safe everyone!
A Thank You from an East Valley Citizen -
Chief VanLeuven,
This week in the East Valley School District, Deputy Johnston and Deputy Smith presented families (with)
information about a wide variety of issues facing youth and families in the Spokane Valley. I've attached the
flier that went out to the families of the East Valley School District. As a parent, long time community
member, and educator in the Spokane Valley, I was appreciative of their presentation and educational
efforts. They shared many resources and put a personal touch on the topics at hand that broke down barriers
that are often in place between community members and agencies like the ones you and I both lead.
Ijust wanted you to know that I attended the meeting and was very impressed with what both Deputies are
doing to protect and educate our community. I also would like you to know that we are appreciative of the
partnership we have with the sheriffs department, the school resource deputy program, and the regional
training facility now housed in our school district.
Once again, I just wanted you to know the great work both are accomplishing in the schools here in East
Valley.
********************
Page 8
2015 APRIL CRIME REPORT
To date:
Yearly totals:
Apr -15
Apr -14
2015
2014
2,014
2,013
2,012
2011
2010
2009
BURGLARY
69
104
296
368
1167
1101
1062
1027
936
725
FORGERY
41
54
198
206
659
850
826
593
341
297
MALICIOUS MISCHIEF
130
132
551
523
1645
1628
1770
1566
1183
1245
NON -CRIMINAL
7
14
50
46
151
106
108
160
917
892
PROPERTY OTHER
124
136
501
478
1449
1469
1236
1126
837
933
RECOVERED VEHICLES
24
43
117
199
464
541
446
416
365
187
STOLEN VEHICLES
35
42
139
231
573
602
586
566
496
298
THEFT
247
247
1009
873
3096
3040
2636
2512
2365
2162
VEHICLE OTHER
12
27
71
97
279
268
287
195
3
5
VEHICLE PROWLING
64
86
418
432
1196
1206
1165
1491
1395
920
TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES
753
885
3,350
3,453
10,679
10,811
10,328
9,615
8,852
7,668
ASSAULT
81
90
354
329
1087
950
936
963
895
927
DOA/SUICIDE
24
22
93
83
222
225
256
213
188
210
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
46
31
189
118
485
538
600
714
1297
1226
HOMICIDE
0
1
0
1
3
2
2
3
1
3
KIDNAP
2
2
9
16
38
24
17
15
16
21
MENTAL
34
16
131
94
307
268
270
253
289
310
MP
12
12
49
39
138
156
154
125
128
115
PERSONS OTHER
279
260
1136
1150
3366
3124
3112
2484
1692
1621
ROBBERY
7
7
34
23
94
96
79
98
68
75
TELEPHONE HARASSMENT
12
15
46
49
132
148
212
162
153
159
TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES
497
456
2041
1739
5231
5531
5638
4997
4727
4,667
ADULT RAPE
8
5
27
25
70
38
89
67
44
35
CHILD ABUSE
2
7
12
16
42
26
27
89
115
159
CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE
11
23
68
86
237
236
190
184
206
157
SEX REGISTRATION F
0
0
0
0
0
4
8
2
1
2
INDECENT LIBERTIES
0
4
3
12
29
20
27
17
8
10
RAPE/CHILD
1
2
5
4
13
13
13
23
28
35
RUNAWAY
37
43
140
135
406
397
530
510
490
440
SEX OTHER
8
8
19
22
69
46
38
56
215
211
STALKING
1
2
6
5
24
21
24
19
18
15
SUSPICIOUS PERSON
51
43
203
183
604
440
424
341
215
175
TOTAL SEX CRIMES
119
137
483
488
1494
1271
1370
1294
1387
1271
TOTAL ITF
25
27
116
117
336
316
430
521
542
671
TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS
277
220
1120
1095
3216
3525
3957
3569
3081
3,183
TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED
1,671
1,725
7,110
6,892
21,434
21,454
21,723
19,996
18,589
17,460
2015 April
INCIDENTS BY CITIES
(Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office)
5/15/2015
AH
CH
DP
FC
FF
LAH
LL
ML
MW
RF
SCO
SPA
SPK
SV
WAV
TOTALS
CAD INCIDENTS
32
198
236
14
10
0
29
177
82
10
3,469
2
627
4,972
0
9,858
SELF INITIATED INCIDENTS
27
14
120
1
0
0
19
114
26
3
1,224
0
553
2,001
0
4,102
DRUG SELF INT (PATROL)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
3
0
7
TRAFFIC STOPS
5
4
45
0
0
0
8
35
11
0
620
0
274
1,245
0
2,247
TRAFFIC STOPS (ARST/CIT/IN)
0
1
20
0
0
0
4
7
3
0
258
0
118
560
0
971
TS (WARRANTS)
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
8
0
7
19
0
37
CALLS FOR SERVICE
5
184
116
13
10
0
10
63
56
7
2,245
2
74
2,971
0
5,756
ALARMS
0
5
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
114
0
1
88
0
212
ACCIDENTS
1
7
3
0
1
0
0
0
6
0
143
0
8
164
0
333
ACCIDENTS (ARREST/CIT)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
12
0
17
DRUG CALLS
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
11
0
0
38
0
55
DV
14
0
8
1
1
0
4
2
2
2
92
0
5
159
0
290
DUI
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
79
0
2
80
0
168
DUI (ARREST)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
20
0
24
PURSUITS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY
6
8
24
0
1
0
0
27
10
1
397
1
35
503
0
1,013
VEHICLE RECOVERED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
2
27
0
47
911 ABANDON LINE
0
85
12
8
2
0
0
11
7
0
221
0
4
299
0
649
SHOPLIFTING
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
80
0
84
ALL ARRESTS (ARREST/CIT/IN)
2
1
30
1
2
0
5
13
6
0
340
0
137
827
0
1,364
CRIME CHECK REPORTS
1
0
18
0
0
0
0
16
11
7
396
0
4
496
0
949
5/15/2015
*
2015 APRIL CRIMES BY CITIES
(Only crimes handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office)
5/14/2015
AH
CH
DP
FC
FF
LAH
LL
ML
MW
RF
SCO
SPA
SPK
SV
WAV
Total
BURGLARY
5
0
1
0
0
0
4
1
1
0
58
0
1
69
0
140
FORGERY
2
0
2
0
0
0
4
3
2
2
45
0
0
41
0
101
MAL MISCHIEF
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
85
0
4
130
0
226
NON -CRIMINAL
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
4
0
2
7
0
17
PROP OTHER
14
0
6
0
1
0
13
2
3
1
55
0
17
124
0
236
RCRVD VEH
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
28
0
2
24
0
55
STL VEH
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
38
0
1
35
0
76
THEFT
35
0
4
0
0
0
9
3
4
2
149
0
7
247
0
460
VEH OTHER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
1
12
0
21
VEH PROWL
13
0
5
0
0
0
6
0
3
0
36
0
1
64
0
128
il DI III A WI KI] WI DI:1I II'Ltl NI Id I DLM
69
0
22
1
1
0
41
9
17
5
506
0
36
753
0
1,460
ASSAULT
4
1
2
1
2
0
0
9
2
0
50
0
7
81
0
159
DOA/SUICIDE
3
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
26
0
0
24
0
57
DV
14
0
2
0
0
0
4
2
0
1
31
0
2
46
0
102
HOMICIDE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
KIDNAP
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
MENTAL
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
21
0
1
34
0
61
MP
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
12
0
22
PERS OTHER
12
1
14
0
0
0
21
8
5
3
176
0
23
279
0
542
ROBBERY
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
7
0
12
TEL -HARASS
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
10
0
0
12
0
24
0 to al no UM MN N Id I Dl.'
36
2
21
1
2
0
28
20
10
4
327
0
33
497
0
981
ADULT RAPE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
2
8
0
16
CHILD ABUSE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
4
CUST INTFER
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
16
0
0
11
0
29
SEXREGISF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IND LIBERTY
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
RAPE/CHILD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
RUNAWAY
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
30
0
0
37
0
69
SEX OTHER
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
8
0
14
STALKING
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
4
SUSP PERSON
9
0
1
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
27
0
0
51
0
97
TOTAL SEX CRIMES
10
0
2
0
0
0
11
2
0
0
89
0
3
119
0
236
TOTAL ITF
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
8
0
4
25
0
41
TOTAL TRAFFIC
15
0
11
0
0
0
8
2
4
0
150
0
47
277
0
514
TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED
131
2
57
2
3
0
88
34
32
9
1,080
0
123
1,671
0
3,232
5/14/2015
Clement
5
ti
a
mausarailm
rum
nori6�14>37'c1Y
1n mum+=ng4.0
o
..m1141.1:0
1 1111/1111 i-- . .
11041611,1raltetlip
X
0
id
G
berty Lake
���! �►��sta
3
h
__FiiP__ --
R'n,=
--rA-
rrom
WiErimogii
=LIME
--fGis
—r --
MJEWAIMEN
�.�
G_:_MELT
qua
OYY
9
gene Terre
Ball
S
c0
ay
ie
Traffic
Collisions
Low
Medium Low
▪ Medium
▪ High
0
0.5
I Miles
I I 1
2015 April Traffic Collision Hotspots
Map Produced:
13 May 2015
.,��E�1�1■ �i �7 , o�a . �.
•
! llJllllilllIi= : L`' •
vuggEWillIIGi .II 111
tl��lJ 1f
11�tri oswAii Igo
P •
■' ppm
of OVINE 1��--
id
Gra
Lake
Magi EA k
rL■■■wi■rr■�g11l��.prin�l�ll���i��� { v
EMI
111, Q)�R � `� � 1�
Ii MI Cllr rj �� �
11,1257M : � iIN rte6 ILO P!EiyMI
ummEmEm
1 c"
gaIlaliMINE
A�
Aad�,? mi
EPPIIMPIM
— —, I
M
=EM
—�Y
loll lwizaialM
a:1iZSl:�
McZEM
—F]{'IIM i]
MIT
—•
0
0
EI
Y
0
ie
Commercial
Burglaries
Low
▪ Medium
▪ High
0
0.5
I Miles
I i 1
2015 April Commercial Burglary Hotspots
Map Produced:
12 May 2015
...1111111`a
!11111111111 ' - L,
941MVIIImmffammag
Ilb :11 111 ,
-"° 1.1 ., 211
e 1 1111'
.,,,M1
N ili7
1101:7M1
7
=+=84.—M
==41it`S'.M
'IMMUNE&
�—auw.E 1-
WO- IME-Ir11111 It e
millMEINE b.
�,.
..UFu
iliffiENIMEM
E-rrrrw
IMMM5—rG1
---raZwrzimm
MWIZIlialM
_EN_Jki--
_—A--
_—M1—_
- En= sig
AF,O, Camp
Nazi-
13 w Wm.
iiIr✓f �.
111 �s F
, lk $7th till
liddiiillEIN
.— --- _
try--=►
---
mmlommm
mmlo--
Residential
Burglaries
▪ Low
▪ Medium
▪ High
2015 April Residential Burglary Hotspots
11111�.•�
11111M Mm r7
Ent 1111111 L I L`' •
N UMMI:A'IIGi.11111
�'W'1141111011E10"."nim ppm_ I _AO
glowmii Iry
121M
111
WS WWII iiiINV
i��G1 - �� F�O�a Pit Old g 2 .Wal '
•u 191 f �� ■`-■-Fs..�u - t 'moi riii■millivailMi
Z'�l .r`1�'"■■' , EMMENEI.=-1�`-IIIIl�I1.1.+MilEMM N �1: � 4A m a i:�III ■■■N �o 1UP1�1..1� I Q�Q i —i na ff,mh�mom= uria:It ° i11�y■��� _ azilrm I MMENNE - 00
. ���uu11„Il_i!1 uriEus. ront 1111 .E `�i�� .1 Li' �r ay.
E -r. -l' Feil
III -MED 1.1
III•PEC41 Stn
_il.._.
`-1CIiltr`S'f•.11
R mUAUI 1 s n •
—.....
M7-1•y��� \l121117 y
OM!!�8_�. r
:M _'4 J
4v o=
INUI♦—'S MIM
IGS
azwrzimm
==--A--
1JI—'r
�C...JPi
Y
E\k
° Q dge
Stolen
Vehicles
▪ Low
▪ Medium
▪ H igh
0 0.5 I Miles
I i I
2015 March & April Stolen Vehicle Hotspots
Map Produced:
12 May 2015
a
PP to
oX11grr
!i!I mow-
■ie= IVF` I�InLiC_ 1.5171 in 151111MIEMIE ram 44,*:AVIErrimor
id
id
Ga
Lake
‘smow e1l3 -_ _......!aiii!JmriW
!iJ
Eill Mk iiIMINMMIIIIME 111
HIM
0
ie
Y
b2
Vehicle
Prowling
Low
▪ Medium
▪ High
0
0.5
I Miles
I I I
2015 April Vehicle Prowling Hotspots
Map Produced:
12 May 2015
1600
1400
1200
1000
800
600
400
200
0
Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-. 2012
f 2013
f 2014
X2015
ArAIMIL
0
A'7-
y
‘ib,
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUN
JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-. 2012
f 2013
f 2014
X2015
4500
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
- 2012
2013
- 2014
- 0- 2015
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS
•
,Nw
V,FA /
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
- 2012
2013
2014
-0- 2015
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
Spokane Valley Person Crimes
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
- 2012
f 2013
2014
-0- 2015
900
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
Spokane Valley Property Crimes
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
-..2012
f 2013
--2014
X2015
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents
JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
- 2012
2013
- 2014
- 0- 2015
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Spokane Valley Sex Crimes
•
A
•
JAN
FEB
MAR APR MAY JUN
JUL
AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC
2012
f 2013
2014
-0- 2015
SpUk ine
1 .� Val ley
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MONTHLY REPORT
April 2015
AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION
Contract Name
Contractor
Contract
Total
% of
Expended as
Contract
Amount
of 4/30/15
Expended
Street Maintenance
Poe Asphalt
$1,366,663.00
$277,250.94
20.29%
Street Sweeping
AAA Sweeping
$490,199.94
$210,857.45
43.01%
Storm Drain Cleaning
AAA Sweeping
$189,990.00
$63,198.07
33.26%
Snow Removal
Poe Asphalt
$40,000.00
$5,792.62
14.48%
Landscaping
Senske
$53,250.00
$0.00
0.00%
Emergency Traffic Control
Senske
$10,000.00
$2,249.02
22.49%
Litter and Weed Control
Geiger Work Crew
$60,000.00
$14,413.41
24.02%
State Highway Maintenance
WSDOT
$265,000.00
$61,073.23**
23.05%
Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping
Spokane County
$582,000.00
$93,194.77**
16.01%
Dead Animal Control
Brad Southard
$20,000.00*
$1,960.00
9.80%
* Budget estimates
** Does not include April 2015 — waiting on invoices
Citizen Requests
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Citizen Requests for Public Works
Total
Citizen
Requests:
Misc
Public Requests
Works
• Submitted
49
Landscapi
ng
Roadway
Hazard
1
1 1 1
Pothole
Requests
Sign & Storm Traffic
Signal Drainage/
Requests Erosion Requests
2
5
13
9
7
2
11
• In Progress
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
• Resolved
48
2
5
12
9
7
2
11
*Information in bold indicates updates
1
WASTEWATER
Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/,
http://www.ecy.wa.qov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm,
http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and
http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/
STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY
The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of
Spokane Valley for April 2015:
• AAA Sweeping continued arterial maintenance sweeping.
• AAA Sweeping continued residential sweeping. (60% Complete).
• AAA Sweeping continued vector operations (drywells, catchbasins and swale inlets)
• Poe Asphalt finished spring shouldering operations and began asphalt patch work.
• Crackseal operations began on April 8th
• The Geiger crew picked up 5,720 lbs. of litter and debris from our rights of way.
STORMWATER UTILITY
The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for April
2015:
• Roadway Landscaping Services commenced with Senske.
• Roadway Weed Control Services to eliminate weeds from paved surfacing was bid
and opened on April 3, awarded to Spokane ProCare.
• Received and began negotiations on draft Grant Agreements from Ecology for
Sprague LID, Storm Drain Retrofits with Pavement Preservation Projects, and
Decant Phase 3 (Canopy add) Projects.
• Continued work on update and development of Stormwater Capital projects list for 2016-
2021
• Continued work on various capital improvement projects, (see below).
TRAFFIC
CIP Projects
Staff continues to coordinate with traffic related design and study items as part of CIP projects. Staff
provided input and assisted with the 2018-2020 CMAQ and TAP call for projects.
Specific Studies
Staff is coordinating with the consultant to wrap up the University Overpass Study. Staff continues to
coordinate with the consultant on the Sullivan Road Corridor Study.
Development Projects
Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development
Engineering with the Comprehensive Plan Update.
*Information in bold indicates updates 2
CAPITAL PROJECTS
Sfrikane
Public Works Projects
Monthly Summary - Design & Construction
April -2015
Street Projects
0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement #4508
0156 Mansfield Ave Connection
0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety
0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project
Street Preservation Projects
0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project
0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley & Wellesley
0218 Montgomery Ave St Preservation
0220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation
FHWA- BR
FHWA-CMAQ
HSI P
CDBG
FHWA - STP(U)
COSY
COSY
COSY
Traffic Projects
0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06-3) FHWA-CMAQ
0167 Citywide Safety Improvements
0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates
Stormwater Projects
0197 Broadway, Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit
Other Projects
0176 ApplewayTrail
HSI P
HSI P
06/27/14 07/18/14
06/05/15 06/19/15
10/02/15 10/23/15
06/26/15 07/15/15
04/10/15 05/01/15
03/27/15 04/15/15
05/22/15 06/05/15
05/08/15 05/22/15
11/07/14 12/05/14
05/25/15 06/12/15
tbd tbd
100
100
85
60
11
0
0
0
09/30/16
10/31/15
10/31/15
06/30/15
99 0 10/31/15
100 0 07/30/15
90 0 12/31/15
100 0 12/31/15
100 0 08/31/15
95 0 12/31/15
0 0 03/01/19
$ 15,833,333
$ 2,002,350
$ 722,795
$ 365,227
$ 1,156,500
$ 628,703
$ 285,890
$ 316,965
$ 1,721,880
$ 474,580
$ 81,000
Dept of Ecology 04/10/15 04/27/15 100 0 07/31/15 $ 60,000
COSY 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 32 05/30/15 $ 1,605,400
Design & Construction $ 25,254,623
Design
Bid
Estimated
Total
Project
Proposed
Open
% Complete
Construction
Project
#
Design & Construction Projects
Funding
Ad Date
Date
PE I CN
Completion
Cost
Street Projects
0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement #4508
0156 Mansfield Ave Connection
0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety
0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project
Street Preservation Projects
0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project
0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley & Wellesley
0218 Montgomery Ave St Preservation
0220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation
FHWA- BR
FHWA-CMAQ
HSI P
CDBG
FHWA - STP(U)
COSY
COSY
COSY
Traffic Projects
0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade (SRTC 06-3) FHWA-CMAQ
0167 Citywide Safety Improvements
0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates
Stormwater Projects
0197 Broadway, Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit
Other Projects
0176 ApplewayTrail
HSI P
HSI P
06/27/14 07/18/14
06/05/15 06/19/15
10/02/15 10/23/15
06/26/15 07/15/15
04/10/15 05/01/15
03/27/15 04/15/15
05/22/15 06/05/15
05/08/15 05/22/15
11/07/14 12/05/14
05/25/15 06/12/15
tbd tbd
100
100
85
60
11
0
0
0
09/30/16
10/31/15
10/31/15
06/30/15
99 0 10/31/15
100 0 07/30/15
90 0 12/31/15
100 0 12/31/15
100 0 08/31/15
95 0 12/31/15
0 0 03/01/19
$ 15,833,333
$ 2,002,350
$ 722,795
$ 365,227
$ 1,156,500
$ 628,703
$ 285,890
$ 316,965
$ 1,721,880
$ 474,580
$ 81,000
Dept of Ecology 04/10/15 04/27/15 100 0 07/31/15 $ 60,000
COSY 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 32 05/30/15 $ 1,605,400
Design & Construction $ 25,254,623
Street Projects
0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker
0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC
0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan
0201 ITS InfiII Project- Phase 1
0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement
0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission)
0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent
Traffic Projects
0159 University Road Overpass Study
0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study
Stormwater Projects
0193 Effectiveness Study
0198 Sprague, Park to University LID
0199 Havana -Yale Diversion
0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion
FHWA-STP(U)
FHWA-STP(U)
FHWA-STP(U)
FHWA-CMAQ
COSY
HSI P
COSY
08/15/15
12/31/17
09/30/15
06/30/15
12/31/15
12/30/15
tbd
FHWA - CMAQ 05/29/15
FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15
Dept of Ecology 02/28/16
Dept of Ecology 03/01/16
Dept of Ecology 10/31/16
Dept of Ecology 10/31/16
11
90
90
5
8
0
0
98
90
60
30
35
35
$ 517,919
$ 175,260
$ 276,301
$ 327,562
$ 51,619
$ 616,000
$ 10,000
$ 249,711
$ 200,000
300,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
Design only $ 2,784,372
*Information in bold indicates updates 3
Design
Total
Project
Complete
% Complete
Project
#
Design Only Projects
Funding
Date
PE
Cost
Street Projects
0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker
0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC
0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan
0201 ITS InfiII Project- Phase 1
0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement
0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission)
0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent
Traffic Projects
0159 University Road Overpass Study
0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study
Stormwater Projects
0193 Effectiveness Study
0198 Sprague, Park to University LID
0199 Havana -Yale Diversion
0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion
FHWA-STP(U)
FHWA-STP(U)
FHWA-STP(U)
FHWA-CMAQ
COSY
HSI P
COSY
08/15/15
12/31/17
09/30/15
06/30/15
12/31/15
12/30/15
tbd
FHWA - CMAQ 05/29/15
FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15
Dept of Ecology 02/28/16
Dept of Ecology 03/01/16
Dept of Ecology 10/31/16
Dept of Ecology 10/31/16
11
90
90
5
8
0
0
98
90
60
30
35
35
$ 517,919
$ 175,260
$ 276,301
$ 327,562
$ 51,619
$ 616,000
$ 10,000
$ 249,711
$ 200,000
300,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
Design only $ 2,784,372
*Information in bold indicates updates 3
PLANNING
Proposed Draft 2016-2021 Six -Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP)
A Proposed Draft of The Six -Year TIP has been completed and this information has been
given to City Council on April 28, 2015. Staff will work with the City Council to adopt a final
plan by the end of June. The State requires the City to submit its final TIP to WSDOT by July
1, 2015.
GRANTS
2018-2020 CMAQ and TAP Call for Projects
A Motion Consideration was taken to City Council on April 14, 2015 for projects to submit to
SRTC for the 2018-2020 CMAQ & TAP grant program. The motion carried for the projects
listed below and applications were submitted to SRTC on April 30, 2015:
Congestions Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ):
Project Name
Grant
Request
City Match &
Other Available
Funding
Total Project
Cost
Appleway Trail — Evergreen to Sullivan
$1,422,925
$222,075
$1,645,000
Appleway Trail — University to Balfour Park (CN
Only)
$449,800
$70,200
$520,000
Evergreen & Broadway ITS
$1,617,550
$252,450
$1,870,000
Sullivan — Wellesley Intersection Improvement
Project
$1,085,425
$284,575*
$1,370,000
TOTAL
$4,575,700
$829,300
$5,405,000
(* includes Spokane County contribution of $99,625)
Transportation Alternatives (TA):
Project Name
Grant
Request
City Match &
Other Available
Funding
Total Project
Cost
Apple way Trail — University to Balfour Park (PE &
ROW Only)
$198,950
$31,050
$230,000
Opportunity Elementary — SRTS Sidewalk Project
$432,500
$67,500
$500,000
TOTAL
$631,450
$98,550
$730,000
Grand TOTAL
$5,207,150
$927,850
$6,135,000
*Information in bold indicates updates
4
Meeting Date:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
June 2, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Montgomery Avenue Street Preservation Project, Dartmouth to
University - #0218
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 17, 2014 Adopted 2015 Budget,
Resolution 14-015 which included this pavement preservation projects.
BACKGROUND:
The Montgomery Avenue Street Preservation project will place a two-inch asphalt overlay on
Montgomery Avenue between University Road and Dartmouth Lane. The pedestrian ramps will
also be updated and the storm water facilities will be replaced.
This project is funded with City Street Preservation funds. Public Works staff designed the
project. Bids were advertised on May 22 and are scheduled to be opened on Friday, June 5,
2015. A copy of the bid tabulation will be provided at the June 9th council meeting for award
consideration.
OPTIONS: Information Only
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information Only
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved the 2015 budget with $2,615,050 in Fund
311 Street Preservation projects. The project budget for Montgomery Avenue Street
Preservation is $285,890 to be paid out of Fund 311. There are sufficient funds in Fund 311 to
cover the cost for this project.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Eric Guth, PE — Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: None