The URL can be used to link to this page

SPE-34A-78 1 -6 ' zs ~LA S r Contact Person Name Du,3iness Name ~Xle t~~e,~ Ad d r e s s ' Acl d r e s s ' Prione Gl ~'t~onc County Contact Person Phone Noe 456-3600 Date - , , CONiMERCIAL BUILDING PERMIT KEVIEW ~ This building permit review is intended Lo appraise you of the impcovemen[s (raadway, sicie- walk, curb, stormwater, etc.) whicti muat be constructeci in associatio» wi[li your tiuilding permit. Thi,e checklist will be filled au[ by the Enbineer's sLaff and a copy will be re- tucned to you at the time that ttie permit is ini tialed by the Ft}bineecing Uepartinerit. All requiremen[s ehatl be completed prior [o issuacice of thc butldiug permi[. All unchecked ----.boxes require additional research or informaCion to make a determina[iona I. Stormwater Drnina~e Considerntions -A. Per gu~lc eTInes for "SCormwater Management 19$1" both on and off si[e. 1. 208 Considerattons* ki Yes Li No 2. Fload hazard zone considerations** Li Yes Vr No 3. Storm Drainage Plan ~ Xes ~ No II. Planning AcCion ll S pe 3 le Plat, sfiort plat, rezone, Conditional Use or Variance ~ Yes ~ No on proper[yo Planning Number 2e Are requiremente of planning action incorporated Li Yes :1 No i nto si te plan I I I e Ri~ht of Way ~ 1. Does permit necessita[e R.O.W. dedica[ion Yes a No /cO te e ~ rr 2. Did zone change require R.O.W. dedicaCion ~,~aw ~ Yes Ll No 3e Radius at corner Li Yes ~ No IVe County Road Improvements le Roads need to be improved. How wide Li Yes ~ No 2. Curb Li Yes ~ h'o 1 3. CRP/RID agreement (Copy of deed, contract, or hA Yes Ll No tiCle report reyuired.) 4. Plans for improvementa provided a Yes ~ No 5. Sidewalk ~ Yes No V. Parking Plan & Approach Location 1. Review and sign of f by Traf f ic ~ Yes Li No 2. Approach Permit f rom Engineer's Of fice Ll Yes u No 3. State or Ci ty si gn of f Li~ Yes ~ No 4, Is thi.s road on 6 Year Plan ` Yes ~ No VI. ULID Apreement: Yes ~ No ~ VII. Field Review: Preliminary Cownenta ~ N. n t d_)-d z-2-o c~ _ _S~ ~ - ~ UftA4 2rtu7vr`1 t--7~ i C?,,o~- 2 a c r r ~ a , DAea 0s ~0 6le~~tJ,~9~Gr~Cs' kj ( Ad G ` ~ ~-c &.c - ~ All land within the Aquifer Sensitive Area, where deemed feasible by the Cvunty E<<gt- neer, shall incorporate stormwater treaCinent to rnitigate thP poteiitlal for grounciwater degradatione (See Guidelines For Stormwater Ptanagement 1981, Spokane Soard of County Comrnisaioner'8 Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended.) The pucpose of flood hazard zone revtew is to minimtze los9es due [o flooding in spe- cific ereas designated by Flood E(azard Bouciciary maps on ftle at the County Eligineer's OEfice. (See Spakane Board of County Commissioiier's Resolution hoe 81-0126, as amended.) 8/22/85 _ ')7n 550 8''01190261 OA ' o 6 ?4 ?t4!~ NOTOCE TO THE PUBLIC PARGELNG PURPOSE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That James M. Hemphill and Carol A. Hemphill being the owners of the following described lands in consideration of mutual benefits to be hereafter derived do for themselves, their heirs, grantees and assigns, hereby agree to the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) property, and further not to obiect, by the signing oi a balloc, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution includes the owner(s) property. If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, ~ as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. The ~o-n3itioaG. an3 5tateinczr.ts appIy tu Lne fulloWiLLg desc.riued property. Tract 20, BACON°S ADDITION TO GREENACRES, as reaorded in Volume "J" of Plate,, Page 159 in Spokane County9 jdashingtono In Section 18a Township 25 North9 Range 45 E. W. M. ~ ~ . 0-o ;nc , << , , i ~ . ~ These requirements are and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the owners, their heirs, successors or assigns. . IN WITNESS EOF, We have hereunto set our hand(s) and seal(s) this day o f 19 ' ~ / ~ rjr rJ 7 ~ IDe a~'t. f~emp J ' f , Fi / tl I ~JC L~ (1, ~ Uarol Ao Hemphill f vr i • t ..I ± ~J ~ ' - s i . . . 810119O2L%'O ~AL D ^uj~;~ hl,~r, S ~ ' r*,J ' ~(lp NO -5 ~ /~~.~2 ?_e~Z t N OT 9 C E T0 THE P U B I I C rii► CE i:,, - PURPOSF ~SPE-,3 544 - 7J~ KNOW ALL'MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That James M. Hemphill and ~ Carol A. Hemphill being the owners of the following described lands in consideration of mutual benefits to be hereafter derived do for themselves, their heirs, grantees and assigns, hereby agree to the following: To authorize the County to place [heir name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes ttie owners property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULIll by resolution metliod pursuant to Rr,tJ Chanter 'iFi Q4, {;.h i:.c A.;, 1c s t;ie owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection tu any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction witti the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. This statement involves the following described property: Tract 20, BACON° S ADDITION TO GREENACRES, as reaorded in Volwne "J" of Plats4 Page 15, in Spokane County, Washingtone In Section 18, Township 25 North, Range 45 E-'ri, M o ,c ~ ~ r • ~ ~~V ~f,I + t t ~ ► These requirements are and shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the own@rs, their heirs, successors or assigns. IN WITNES WHEREOF, He have hereunto set our hand(s) and seal(s) this /-V dyl' of ~7c.A 1,4f- , 19 A7 • ~ / mes o Memp Carol A. $em ' P STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss On this day personally appeared before me James M. Hemphill and Carol A. Hemphill personally known to me to be the individual(s) who eAecuted the forgoing ~iostrument and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and volUntary 'act`a arld deed of ~ said individual(s), for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. y . (I. ~ , ~ ^ " i ~ `'~E ~ } • + i 1V Given under my hand and seal this day of ` G~J • ~~~r~ , ,~ti t",~;•~ ~a' f~ ~ ~ _~~~'r; ~ ~ ~--1 Notarv Publlc , ~~~.;~~►;~P~.~,,, G i~ In and for the 5tate of Wa~hington, i• v residing in spoka,ne9 Washington • ~ ww- u , . : KE(1UN:ST FUK Ut5 IGN UF'VlAT [UN ROAD NAME ,Q~) - - - - - - ` DATEI _Cltt'/RID/PLAT/Z.C. No~~~,~~~~~`~_ _ N-EDEkAL/ STATE YROJECT N0. P4PROJECT TITLE PROJECT LIMITS EXISTING CONI)ITIUN5: PROPOSEU IMPROVEMENT: ROAD WIDTH ROAD SURFACE AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC Curren[ Design Year . PROJECT DESCItIPTION 1~f4ijLj DY` . , - DESCRIYTION 0 S A DARD INVOLVED~~~_ j~~,0`~~ O 1~ I d C C) 7N- i ~ 4/ ~ . ~ . - PROPOSED DESIGN ~EVIATION p ~23~.' JUSTIFICATION S Ss~ ` S av . " Submitted B Da t e ~ STAM F RECtiMAiENUAT [UNti ZE_.~%~'.;:;--- --o~ ts ROA.~_ __~411L- ---/\1f: AR._- - - • - ~'~=L -C4 Approvrd Not Approved - - - - - - - ---s-~ Section Engineer Date _ C ~.J •-:;Y c!`_ - - - -Z= (.~L- - - ----l - _ v ~ - ` - . - - j ~ - - Approve Not Appruved ?i~ ~ r a f c En g i nDa t e~ ~ ~ - ~ _ _ - - - ~ ~-u-~- _ , Approved No[ Approved 10131 ~ Li Office Eng_ineer Uate ~ Cv/ ~ ~ 0 Co LZ-1- : i ~ G F F- ~ r' . , , n,/~ f V /F' ~/L~ ~ ; _ _ _ 14r✓ I~ ~ t-= _ ~ ~ f !`it~i r, , AGf-7- C'C- A`7 Approved Not Approved Divi3Fion Engineer ~ Date ~ 'r✓~ ~E~ t:' ~ - - - - A- - - - - - - - - _ -~A-E Approved Not Appro,vc~d _ 1 • ~ Dae C u eer . . . . .r~`~ PAGE '~1:~~(~~t):~1d ✓ SHORT FORM Greenacres Branch 101, ' Old National eank DEED. OF TRUST East 18303 Corbin Plact CONVENTIONAL RESIDENTIAL TNIS DEED OF TitU% l' madr ihi• 23rd day ~sl` OCtOblr 75 . M:TM.t.♦ N Maxrell J. Heuett and Sharyl L. Heuettr h i 5 w i f e# wh.,..• .nAlrv%. 0.4 E. 17505 Cataldo, Greenacres, MA - - - - - • Pioneer liational Title Insvrance Canpany^ _ . - - - / iti ~ whvsc .ee«.s is M. 521 FiSQt,, SpOkaller NA - • Me OLD NATIONAI ILANK Of WAiMiNGTON Greenacres Branch , erwrl.. ~aR. whose eddr&ss in S. 18303 Dorbin P1aC@,, GreBI18Crts t, NA , Gan1or hereby irrevocably granls, beraoins, srlls •nd conveys lo Trustee gn Irusl, wtlh powrrr o( salr, 11w 1c.11olawes d.1- crised propeHy tn Mp2M•4r County, MrashmiRton: Tract 201. Bacon'a Addition to Greenacree according to Plat recorded in Vblaie 'J' o! Plats, Paqe 15, in Spakane County, itashinqton ~ TOG[TN[R rITN •11 crnewwms, hettdilsawnl• •nd •pvu/fMaK1s. now or Atrea/trr Ifyreuwo belontie+t or in awywsse awo►tonwtwe. wnd tM rsnts. Issues and proltt• thereof. •nd •11 listures end peoperty Ihat n►ay De now locoted upon •aid ►ea! propertv ur wwr Aervahe• ►e ew. stallod 1n or otfaehed to or umed tn wadapfvd for use in tM o0erttion of the properlr MQ fenprovwwwnls, Includint. AW rtihovt Aeong ttmMM to, •11 Irase, •hrubs, roctenes, rrlainiey reils, walkli, dsive-vars, buildfeys, •tructwea, In+provvwrrnts •nd (uturAps, pluw+bint, rvotirw IyMins, coo3ing awd ventitatieg appmratuo. •rrningli, door •nd windorr scr+ens, bu[It-sn rangea, disMvasMre, rt(tjgeratore, .vasl+ero, dsspoools, Mr+t• and wutwo, ruts. carpelint and olAor floor tovoring wrterlal, draptrr Irrvero• rod• •nd Irrdra►e, a11 0l whlch prnprrty, rbetAes iaflneA w ~entitd or nW. shell lot t!w purpose• of thi• Deed o/ Trust be doonned cunciueIveiy to be real estat• •nd conveyed hereDy. Geneor &potls ►o •svcute tawd dellver. froe+ tir to tiiwe, •ucA Ivther Instrumewt• •s nMr be reQuested by 8eneficiary to conlinn the Iien o/ this po.d ul Troar 'sw say provetty. 7o tNe eateM that •ny of the property descriped Mreln rmy Se •uslect to tlrr provislon• o/ the Umfwm Co rSoI Co1e, tIu• dood of trwt to a seevity apeea.eM, grantirg to Mnwflclo►r. socwed party, a•ecurity iMertst in any auch p►ope+ey and the gr+Mw Kser• lo •aecute •ucA financine statvrnem• iney b• reawred by the beneltciary and pay, upon doarrtd, liIlrg tee• tor •ny such Iitiwr.wt •tatrsi~s and condenwtioes tMreof. THIS DC[D l3 FOR THE PURPOS[ OF SECUkING PlRFORMANCE of each o<►eewrM ~(iC~leitur incwpwato~d ey .e/orwce e► cow. r.,~..e n..ein .~,a o.,...m of tn..um of 11wenty-fotir ThOUSand Severi Fiuru~'ed FDOLI.ARS (s 24r750•00 ~ witM lMtiea1 therton accordleg to tht trrena o( a p►oTlsso►y nol• 01 even dol• herowuh. peYabl• to Beneliciary or order mnd issdll, by (SfawrM, aU ritne..rls, modffics!►on• or estension• thrreo/, and also •uch fvtMr summs •s may bo •dvancod w loaned by Aen•ticiarr lo Gr•.+o., ow awI 0/ thea svccreswe w488iana, togelher with IMe►est theroon at •uch rat• •s *hall bc •greed upon. Sy execrtisg awd irlivHfng tlids Dred of Ttust aad t1w Note a e c ar ed hereby. tlK parUe►s egree tMmt all rrer/nNan M raragryM 1 tMougA YI iaclreive of tAe Maatet F'a• Derr of 7?rst UerNMfter reienrd b ue Aereby i6coiPorater ber/s !g relefcwe and •adW a• lategral pri Uereoi fat all pwpses tbe sawe aa il srt totth Aetein sl lewgth. RM Ue (raNw re*e►f aa►rs sald core*aN.s aAd agrees b(ully petlorw all of sald Kor•isioes. TAe ManteY Fotm Deed of Trrsl above refnrcd I,s wras recwlrd m t►e tweiftL (12tb) day of Jww, 1967, 1n the O((kla! Records o( lAe o(tlces of t!k CoNGty Arditots of tAr lolbwlng csr■ties in Rashingtom 1n tAe Oook, and •t lMe psse kslgnaled alter !Ik wsw of eacM cointy. W-wlt: Auditor'. Avlieurs Counff Bouit w Vol. Pose No. 'll• No. Counly Sook or Vol. pag• No. F11• lrw Adam• 1• of Misc. 170 117KIll Lewts 346 941 711614 Asotln Microfilmed w+Aor Auditw•• Mo, 91167S t.incolw L. 0/ Misc. 64S 313s04 ponlon 241 1021 579513 Moson Roo-1 37 Fnrne S48-310 ]]6723 CAoton o82 749 667304 OYenoien 33 e18 S49667 Cialtom 300 401 373183 Pacltic 206 127 49000 Clarie Auelltor's Mierolllen No. 672804 G490SI1 Pond Oroill• 16 o( Mille. 4 it 123113 Colwnbia 11 0l Ytge. 36e Ir-1770 Pkerc• 1206 of Migs. 17 2103039 Cowltes 736 P 001 asl749 ll*w )uan 77 644 sa.IOl Dovgla• 121 JSO 146109 fweait I o/ Otfic. R•c, 102 700441 Perrr 27 of D•.4• 1!! 150919 sY•►n•nia 46 of M1g.. 37 647" Franiillw I31 176 301506 SnoAem1nA 1 l• of Oflic. Rec. 604 196445• Garfiold Msc.ortiR►.e uwde• AuAito+'s No. I27I0 tpokeeH 114! of Mige. )V! 79715SC Gnnt 23 of Rec'd Dec. 230 S24067 ltevons IOl of M~ell. llJ 39751111 Grays l4otbor 107 of M1as. 116 1118841 TAwsion 263 7e1107 lsland 161 404 107634 WahYisYum IS 193 24139 k ellersow 10 of Misc. 407 I92427 wel!• rell• 301 ol Ihas. $24 48615-t lne S134 of IM26. 16 $I641011I rlhoir om • 1 71! 1021411 Kittimp • 193 376 907462 ' eAtl"n 1 of Yisc. i)V ]7457) KitIiime !0• 116 339163 YMliws Sa0 2133391 ' KItcY11at a o! Ms se. 11 II7l4116 A eopr o/ srcA Ylastor ►um Deed •f T►uet f• Mreby frrwleAod t• sM rior"w •vecu11ng tAis Dood of T►ust anA by •soevliwt IAi• Deed of T.wat th• Grantw •ctnowlr4gre reeeiPt of ourA IboIor Iww Dood of 1Ywi. TM aoOterty wAlch i• tho •r►l*ct of tM• Date4 of Trw1 1o nM uood 'rlwclaellir m prlwwlly for •plcullwe) or Iorming purPoses. Two uwderstgneA CNowtw r*quose a Ilwl a rety •1 swr Netie• of D ■u11 •w/ 01 •ny Notie• l• Mrou r Nmei1e0 to hie* e1 tM adde+s• Ivr*&nMlora •et leroh. tTATB OF •ASHINGTON 1 COUNTY Or ~B ~ Z3rd of OCtO~t 75 ~ Tl~is •psc• fos~rved IM Recwdw's use. On tb& a dar Sefnr• ait tMe, ur►Aersigned, a Nolety PuAI►c iw awW fw IIw lkel• o[ •asM Iwgtos, duly coismissiowe4 Sw/ •worn, p~obanelly NHe~ Maswll J. Reuett and BhsrYl L. Nouett • /IlEO 0!t ~EC0110E0 to ~ ~wuws Is !>e iM i~dtv►Iuol 1 hbcri►~d sR ~•.oc Wo1 ~U~ ~ +1~~ fw~rul~g ►wtiruwwnl. an1 •chnow1eAgo1 Ie ~ t1yA ~~~Ig+~ AE~II[ST Of anI &#gIod tM s~►A ~w•~r~w~.w~ ~ arrf ~~r~;~~~ • ~ ' Md dN4. Iw tIr we*s swd ~ ~ 44 IN' 1 N v rtTMt" aw how/ •w/ .1/bc ial a~sl 1~.~1• ~M M1U~ . c ertNicat• L, ~AM MAM . QMl N Y M ti~ ~ ~ ~~T • 2 ~ • 1 sor~c±` lV:..s. ,n .pd r'll I %ul~, .•r tape"w"'i. -'W - A4 544 ~ ~ ~11~1~_f f f ~1E i.i~ ',r .•IJFt0 F~ - ~M L~ 9 4,3 - - wILLiAN c 71;,NAr.~E S~11T~ ~2 3 P I~tES ~A~ Au o ITc R fPOKAliE COt1NTY. MAfM. ' ••t~,t,►•~e- e,r~ ,'3,_,t RFPI1~ - ~ tQln 1 Llt '~!ry W -l.~~~r,7"i~'r I I ~ ~ ; , A;-.'4 . ! ; ~ . . . . . L L . l~ ~l t: ~l ~ c~ Il U 5 ft1G !x L i. L . Cl r. i: t..l 1 : . ~a camew"86M Oi Ten Do l lars ($10 . 00) and Other Valuab is Ir.d poa, oo..v•, apd .utaAts to JAMES Ir! . HEMPN ILL and CAROL A. HEMPH1I., _ aanG w. ~ th! ~~•a id t=~~t°~~. •.~~€'C~ ~!t r~ rn:,f*,y r,r , ~,~1r ~.,cs ~+rr~ _ w-b' 4qC'-- - ract 20, BACON' S ADDITION TO GREENACRES, accor`. o plat recorded in Volume " T" P? p? r?F' 1 W%?Sh]_?? - J t$j LI:'L' `j'Ll :asements, resLricCiuns, reservations arid prvvisions oi recorci, il drL yecoad half 1983 taxes and irrigation assessments; Future assessments :onaolidated Irrigation District No. 19; Assumption of Deed of Trust W+ )ancehare8 Mortgage Company, dated October 23, 1975, Recorded October '~40 1975, zecording #7510240316, in which thp c-.r~--nrPps q~,rpe to na,,i arrnr,i.n,7 r(, i t~ term:= and cnncif ri.r•? 3,6 AM. Pd. 1L "S~IClP" CH0.1lRCr tmw- G~'~ / ~ axyre . euptt ' ,TATE UF 'A'ASfi t'N . s. . _ ~ _ _ . . . . _ - . . ckxribed in snd who executed the witbin and 14ximotnmmt, tflit they tie q4CTId' ag vr'~Ir~Tlf~.ib' i..." srt~ ~fx! ' . ~'NE~ sy ot J une , 19 c ; . ~ ~d ~.yOTARY PdBl1C NOta/y hAk Winid !It[ Qi MrIISNlNGt011 „,4i„. ,t, Sn n tc A~;~. •RIGHT • OF WAY DEEDZ-_ / 7 S a~ ~~~A 4.dU. 2,02 , IN THE MATTER of Cataldo Street No. 1689 K(dOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Bancshares Mortgage Compary and Jamee M. & Carol A. Hemphill , hi s wi fe, of the County of Spokane, i n the State of Washington, in consideration of the benefits and other valuable consideration, and the sum of One and no/100 Dollarsy paid them by the County of Spokane, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane County, the followinq described parcel of land, situated in Spokane County, in the State of Washington, to-wit: The North 10 feet of the South 30 feet of Tract 209 of BACON'S ADDITION TO GREENACRES9 as recorded in Volume "J" of Plats, Page 15, in Spokane County9 Wsehingtono - of Section 18 , Township 25 North, Range 4~_, E.W.M. Ta HAVE ANO TO HOLD the same, unto the said Spokane County for the purposes of a public road forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set hand and seal this day of . 19 . , BANCSHARES MORTGAGE COMPANY ~ . X/ James Mo Hemphill ~ - , X ~ Carol A. Hemphill R/W 1 /1 /85 ~ ~ w - . . t • 1''/ 1 I lfJc1. ~ 1 f ~ ~ oF, + PLAfVfVING DEPARTMEfVT - BROAOWAY CENTRE 9UILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET e ti i PMONE 456-2205 0 . . ~ ~ - SPOKANE WASMINGrON 99260 r SPOMAN[ COUNT♦ CoUaT No„sE MEMORANDUM TOo TO WHOM IT N914Y CONCERH FROM: THOMAS G. MOSHER, AICP9 ZONItdG ADJUSTOR DATE: APRIL 210 1986 ~ SUBJ : Ad3ustments to Ori gi nal Conditional Use Permi t Condi ti ons for SPE-34-18e The content of the following order is subject to appeal and review by any party wi thi n 20 days of the si gni ng of thi s document, pursuant to 4.25.030 c. and 4.25.0609 and all of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinanceo The appeal fee is $75v00 prior to the May 1, 1986 and $100.00 on or after May 1, 1986e 1 n consi dev°ati on of an expansi on of the dog 6cennel i ni ti al ly approved in SPE-34-78 (the present case is SPE-34A-78), the Zoning Adjustor takes note of the followinge 1) The applicant requested on the application relief from an original condition of approval #9 on page 2 of the Order written on October 25D 1978, aherein the condition specified that no di spl ay of on-premise comnerci al si gns or adverti si ng of the kennel is to be allowed. In facta the original owner, and presently the applicant, had a sign addertising the business located at the front portion of the propertye There have been no complaints about this sign, it is in good taste, and does not bl ock or obstruct any eiews. I t i s not i 11 umi nated at t,he present time and does not exceed 20 square feet on each facea more than 6 feet i n hei ght nor 6 feet i n wi dth and appears to be situated at least 10 feet from the public right-of-waye When the application was processed the Planning Department staff neglected to advertise the matter of relief from the sign conditiono . It is the judgement of the Zoning Adjustor that the sign advertl si ng the business, at i ts 1 ocati on adjacent to a f reeway 9 is not unreasonable and that the sign is tastefully done and not ' a di straction. ~ . t J v • - ; . . E i ~ MEMORANDUM ; PAGE 2 ; ~ s ~ It's the judgement of the Zoning Adjustor that this sign should be authorized as if it were subject to a change of condition - order of SPE-34A-78. For clarification, this sign and any other s future signs pertaining to the kennel business shall conform to ~ the standards as spelled out in Sec tion 4.17.120 de of the I Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. 2) Condition #7 of the original approval SPE-34-78 requires screen- ing with live plantings to the west and south of the then proposed kennel. The kennel aras not constructed according to the plans submitted and such plantings would not serve the intended purpose. If the plantings were intended to prodide an audio screeen for the property to the west, the applicant has now accomplished that by erection of a solid fence on the west side of the safety yard9 thus providing a baffling for sounds tradelling in a westerly direction. It is the opinion of the Zoning Adjustor that the purpose and intent of this condition has been achieved by the solid fence addition by the appltcant. It is the position of the Planning Department that it is no longer necessary to enforce all of Condition of Approval V. Any reader of this document is again advised of his right to appeal this administrative decision under the conditions outlined above and subject to the specific provlsions of the Zoning Ordinance. OOOIz • ZON I NG ADJ USTOR SPOKANE COUPdTY9 WASNINGTON IN THE MATTER OF A CHANGE OF CONDITIOIdS TO A) CONDITIOPdAL USE PERMIT AND REVISED SITE PLAN) FIIdDIPdGS9 CONCLUSIOPdS TO ALLOW EXPAPdSION OF AN EXISTING KEIdNEL. ) APdD DECISION (SPE-34A-78); HEMPHILL ~ SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: . The applicant is the owner of an existing kennel, established by action of the Zoning Ad,justor in 1918, Zontng Adjustor File SPE-34-78. The present applicant was not the original applicanto The previous conditional use permit established a limitation of 25 dogs and limited the number of kennels to approximately 22. Other conditions of approdal were also imposed. P resently, the applicant wishes to expand the number of kennels to 50 and the number of permitted dogs to a maximum of 100 through a change of condition to the original conditional use permit and approval of a revised site development plan. LOCATIOPd: The existing bcennel is located at E. 17505 Cataldo in the East Spokane Val l ey. The Assessors Parcel # i s 18552-2025, DEC I S I ON OF THE ZOtd ING ADJ USTOR : Based upon the evidence presented and circumstances associated with the project proposal, the Zoning Adjustor APPROYES the proposal conditioned upon: (1) removal of the existing on-site manufactured home completely or its relocation to a site greater than 200' from the expanded kennel and (proper licensing to in fact have more than one residence on the same site); (2) compliance with originai conditions of approval; and (3) and new conditions of approval stated hereinafter, PUBLIC HEARING: - After examining all available information on file with the application and visiting the subject property and surrounding area, the Zoning Adjustor conducted a public hearing on April 9, 1986, and rendered a written decision on April 249 1986. F I tdD I IdGS OF FACT 1. The proposal is generally located at E. 17505 Cataldo Avenue in the East Spokane Valley area and is further identified as Assessors Parcel #18552-2025, being more specifically described in Zoning Adjustor File SPE-34A-78, 2, The proposal consists of a Change of Condition and e revised site plan for an existing kennel previously approved by Conditional Use Permit SPE-34-78. ihe original kennel was approved and constructed for approximately 22 kennel stalls and a maximum of 25 dogs. The property has since changed haiids and the present owner/applicant rdishes to add an addition to the kennel which approxjmates the size of the existing bcennel, thus allowing a maximum of 100 dogs and 50 kennel units. The expansion would essentially be a°mirror" image of the existing bcennel expansed to the easto The applicant has submitted a very simplified site plan, identifying the existing features of the five acre parcel and the proposed addition (the proposed addition is indicated in yellow high-lighter). The applicant failed to identify a single wide manufactured home located in the southeasterly portion of the five acre - parcel. pFINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE SPE-30-78 PAGE 2 3. The adopted Spokane County Future Land Use Plan designates the area of the proposal as URBAN and the proposal is not inconsistent with the County's Comprehensive Plan, including the Future Land Use Plan. 4. The site is zoned Agricultural which would allow the proposed use upon approval of thi s appl i cati on, 5. The existing land uses in the area of the proposal include mixed residential and agricultural uses, including a residential subdivision to the west; although not irtenediately adjacent to the bcennel area of the subject parcel. 60 7he applicant testified under oath that the resident to the imediate east has no `objecti on to an expansi on of the bcennel. The appl icant al so testified under oath that one of the parties living in the area to the west had advised him that she did not even bcnow that a kennel was there; referring to 1 acbc of noi se a nd odor. 7. Upon inspection of the facilityo the Zoning Adjustor noted that the business was run in a clean and orderly manner. 8. The manufactured home existing on the parcel in the southeasterly corner i s an unperqni tted structure and the appl i cant has been advi sed to remode it in a reasonable time frame. Enforcement action by the staff's Zoning Coordinator will be undertakeno The applicant agreed that the unit would be modeda The unit was established by Conditional Use Permit as a dependent relative residence prior to the applicant's having purchased the facility. The applicant was unaware that it was not a permitted unit and mai ntai ned i t as rental property wi th the same resi dent tenant i n i t as when he purchased the property. The applicant may wish to attempt to establish a simi 1 a r uni t as a dependent rel ati ve housi ng at some poi nt i n the future; but that will be the subject of another application. At this point the Zoning Adjustor makes no Judgement as to whether a future manufactured home could be located at this location within less than 200' of the expanded kennel. 9e The applicant has indicated complete willingness to cooperate with the vari ous heal th authori ti es a,hi ch mi ght regul ate the control and management of animal wa ste and cl eanl iness of such a faci 1 i ty o . 10. The applicant has constructed a safety yard on the west end of the existing kennel for the purpose of allowing some exercise by dogs in a grassy area contained within a fence. The westerly side of the safety yard has been established with awooden fence to reduce or mitigate any sounds of dogs which may be coming fran the open door of 'the west end of the kennel. The applicant plans the same treatment on the east side of the kennel, with the near addi ti on. , 11. The applicant has expressed an intent to construct the new facility in a soundproof and energy efficient manner, utilizing solar energy application on the south facing roof surface. The applicant has spoken of 6" walls with insulation and dual glazing windows for the purpose of both energy efficiency and reduction of sound to the surrounding a rea. 12. It is appropriate to ensure that the previous conditlons of approval are sti11 in force at the si te. However, accompanyi ng thi s document i s an administrative decision that two of the previously required conditions are no longer in effect and that there appears no need to attempt to enforce them. 13. The objector of record is record owner of four residential parcels located approximately 500 feet to the west and northrvest. Other parcels interven between these properties and the kennel property. These parcels are presently undeveloped, but contained within an approded final subdivision. These parcels are on the opposite end of the portion of the bcennel to which the new addition would be constructede The objector of record resides approximately four miles to the northeast, and is therefore not directly affected as a resi dent by acti vi ti es at the si te. The subdi vi si on was developed with knowledge of a perpetual existing kennelo 14. Of the numerous resi dents incl uded wi thi n the 300' of noti fi cati on (fran the sub3ect five acre parcel )o there were no taxpayers or owners who submitted wri tten or verbal ob3ections to the expansion of the kennel o ,10 / P FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS ANO DECISION FILE SPE-34A-78 PAGE 3 15, The kennel is on the north side of Cataldo Avenue which is irrrnediately adjacent to Interstate 90, The property in general is subject to continual freeway background noise. 16. If the question of barking dogs becomes an issue in the future and it is necessary to determine whethe r or not the noise levels are objectionable, the standards provided in WAC 173-60 should be used as a guideline for deciding whether or not the re are unacceptable levels of noise generated at the site and reaching the receiving properties. 17. It will be necessary to initially establish the change in condition for the conditional use permit for the expansion of the bcennel as a two-year permit. At the end of that two year period of time the Zoning Adjustor, after review of any complaints and a rediew of the operation for compliance with the conditions of approval, is then to be authorized to make the conditional use permit permanent upon findings that the applicant is complying with the conditions of approval and that there are no complaints. The Zoning Adjustor may alternatively call for a public hearing at that point to receive testimony regarding the operation. The administrative decision of the Zoning Adjustor to grant permanent status is also subject to review by the Board of Adjustment under the scrutiny of "Review and Administrative Actionu, Section 4025.030 c. of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance as amended or as replaced by subsequent ordinance. 18. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act the endiwonmental checklist and other data has been reviewed and the project has been found to not have any probable signlficant adverse impacts to the physical environ- ment. A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) aras issued on January 29, 1986 and sent to five agencies of jurisdiction. The agencies reviewing the checklist neither indicated that a more detailed environmental review should be provi ded nor congnented that the DNS shoul d be re-consi dered. Comments regarding environmental matters were not made at the public hearing. The re was not sufficient evidence presented pursuant to WAC 197-11-340 (3) (a) to ' wi thdrard the ONS. 190 A letter of support was received from Patrick 0'Dea, D.V.M. stating that the kennel was ope rated by a responsible and caring people who make eve ry effort to maintain a clean and disease-free facility. 20. The applicant has been made aware of the recomendatioRS'of various County/State agencies reviewing this project and has indicated he can comply wi th those recongnendati ons. 21. The proposed site plan indicates that setbacks, parbcing, height of the structure(s) will conform to the Spo6cane County Zoning Ordinance. It will be necessary to remove or relocate the existing manufactured home on the kennel structureo posed 22a The proper legal requirements for addertising of the hearing before the Zoning Adjustor of Spokane County have been mete 23. Any conclusion hereinafter stated which may be deemed a finding herein is hereby adopted as such. From the Findings, the Zoning Adjustor comes to these: CONCLUSIOtdS le The proposal as set forth by the Zoning Adjustor is not detrimental to and is compatible with the public healtho safety and welfare. This conclusion can only be reached if the existing manufactured home is moved or relocated to a point greater than 200' from the proposed bcennel addition, including the exterior safety yard. , . FINDIPdGS, CONCLUSIOtdS AND DECISIOPI FILE SPE-34A-78 PAGE 4 2. The proposal is listed in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance as a conditional use allowed in the Agricultural zone and the proposal does meet the established and applicable criteria described for that conditional use. It will be necessary to remove or relocate the manufactured home in order to comply with the 200' setback requirement from existing residential structures. 3. Various performance standards and criteria are additionally needed to make the use compatible with other permitted actidities in the same dicinity and zone and to insure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities and these shall be addressed as conditions of approval. Particular note is the requirements that the original conditions of approval, except for those addressed i n a separate admi ni strati ve i nterpretati on attached herewi th are among those conditions of approval which the applicant must comply. 4. The Zoning Adjustor may require such conditions of approval as necessary and appropriate to make the project most compatible with the public interest and general welfare. 5. Any finding hereinbefore stated which may be deemed a conclusion herein is adopted as such. DECISIOtd From the foregoing Findings and Conclusions, the Zoning Adjustor APPROVES the proposal for a two year peri od of time, conti ngent upon the manufactured home being removed or relocated to~a point greater than 200' f rom the kennel addition pr,ior to occupancy of the kennel. The original conditions of approval, except as noted in the attached administrative interpretation are required for° compliance and applied to the total project in addition to the following additional conditions of approval stipulated below. COPIDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. GENERAL 1, The following conditions shall apply to the applicant9 owner and successors in interest. . 2. The Department of Building and Safety shall route the building permit application to all of the agencies and offices of county godernment below which are indicated as needing to give their authorization prior to the release of a building permit. Upon reviewin9 the various plans returned to the Department of Building and Safety by the other departments, the depart,nent will consult with the Planning Department if there are any changes resulting from review by the other departments when compared to the plans as approved by the Planning Department. Such review may necessatipi ly resul t i n a revi si on of the si te pl an for use by the Department of Building and Safety or possibly a with-holding of the building permit until any conflicts are resolved. 3. Oue to the sketchy nature of the documents submitted with the application, it shall be necessary for the applicant to submit revised drawings of the addition to the bcennel. Those dra~wi~n s needed for ~app lication fow e bui 1 di n ermi t shal l be submi tted for revi ew by _ ~ie loni naj ustor pri or to a~ l~ ati on for a u~i T~di nq p ermi t. tuch p 1 ans sal~ aress the bari ous i tems sed~erei natter i n subsequent condi ti ons of approval. II. PLAPINIIdG DEPARTMENT l. The applicant must comply with the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTIOId (See RCW 43e21C.080) within 30 days of the final disposition of this application and prior to on-site improvementse The purpose of such a NOTICE OF ACTIOPd is to establish a time limitation upon which the FINDINGS, CONCLUSIOWS AND DECISION FILE SPE-34A-78 PAGE 5 environmental determination for this project can be challengede Alternatidely, the applicant may waide the NOTICE OF aCTION requirements by filing the appropriate documents provided by the Spokane County Planning Department. 2, The kennels for housing of the dogs are to be constructed of soundproof materials or materials designed to reduce noise. Particular attention should be given to insulation ledels of at least R-19 in 6" thicbc walls and a minimum of R-30 insulation values in the ceiling. Windows shall be double glazed and at least the exterior door at the end of the kennel shall be of a well insulated nature. The safety yard shall be designed of solid fencing material for the purposes of intercepting sound traveling toward properti es to the easto I f a questi on ari ses regardi ng the sound levels reaching adjacent properties, the standards of WAC 113-60 shall be used for purposes of such a determination or enforcement. 3. All floor areas of the kennel are to be concrete or othew impervious materials, except that the safety yard may be sodded, but shall not be left as unplanted dirte 4. The disposal of wastewater used to cleanse the kennel areas shall be disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Nealth district. Water for daily or regular washing of the kennels shall be available within the building. 5. The method of waste control and rernoval shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District and non allowed to accumulate. 6. Dogs are to be kept inside the bcennels between the hours of 9 pvm, and 7:30 a.m. 7. At the time more detailed drawings are submitted regarding the con- struction of the addition to the kennel, a site development plan for the fide acre parcel shall be submitted, similar to the one submitted edith the application and showing the dimensions and the lacation of the existing kennel and the proposed addition arith respect to the property lines and other adjacent housing. 8. At just over two years from the date of si gni ng of thi s order or any sub- sequent appeal to this order, the Zoning Adjustor, upon review of a finding of compliance with the conditions of approval and a.finding that compliance exists, shall issue an administrative order granting permanent status to the kennel as long as it has not ceased to operate for more than 365 consecutive days. That order shall be mailed to owners and taxpayers of record in the manner normal for a conditional use permit and be subject to review by the Board of Adjustment under 4.25.030 c. III. DEPARTMEIdT OF BUILDING & SAFETY 1. Any expansion or construction of a new building will require permits in accordance with Section 301 of the Uniform Building Code. 2. Any fence structures constructed in excess of 6' in height may also requi re permi ts from the Department of Bui 1 ding snd Safetyo IV. UTILITIES DEPARTMEPIT 1. The owner(s) or successor(s) in Interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the si gni ng of a protest peti ti on , r FIhlDItdGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISIOId FILE SPE-34A-78 PAGE 6 against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 arhich i ncl udes the Owner( s) property o PROU IDED, thi s condi ti on shal l not prohi bi t the Owner(s) or Successor(s) f rom objecti on to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-si te sewer di sposal systems i s hereby authori aed, Thi s authori zati on 1 s condi ti oned on compl i ance wi th al l rul es and regul ati ons of the Spobcane County Heal th District and is further condi tioned and subject to specific application aPproval and issuance of permits by the Heal th Officer. V. HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface watew and sewage disposal detail plan sha11 be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spobcane County Health District pri or to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permi ts for thi s projecto 2. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of an individual on-site sewage system may be authoriged. 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approeed by the Regional Engineer (Spobcane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 4. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibitedo 5. Disposal of sewage effluent is currently prohibited beneath paved surfaces. 6e The disposal of wastewater used to clear.se the kennel areas shall be disposed of in a manner acceptable to the Health district. Water for daily or regular washing of the kennels shall be available within the building. 7. The method of waste control and removal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District and non allowed to accumulatee 10 VI. EMGINEER'S OFFICE 1. The applicant shall dedicate 10' on Cataldo (frontage service road) for right-of-way prior to any occupancy of the kennel addition. 2e The applicant shall improve Cataido (frontage serdice road) in a manner consistent with County TYPICAL Roadway Section Noo 2, minimum paving width access standard. 3. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of property, his/ her heirs, assigns and successors. 4. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applfcant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improdement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended, Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improve- ments. 5. As an aiternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein9 the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and partici- pati ng 1 n a county road project (CRP ) to the extent of the requi red road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improdements. - - ~ FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION FILE SPE-34A-78 PAGE 7 6. A11 required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Constructiono and other applicable County Standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at tne date of constructionD unless othe nwise approved by the County Engineer. 7. Roadway Standards, TYPICAL Roadway Sections and Drainage Plan required are found in Spokane Board of County Comissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this propsoal. 8. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detail plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Nealth District prior to the issuance of any building permits for this projecte YII, SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTIOPd COIdTROL aUTHORITY 1. Ai r Pol l uti on regul ati ons requi re that dust emi ssi ons duri ng constructi on , and excavation be controllede 7his control may be controlled by use of water sprays, tarps, spri n6c1 ers or suspensi on of acti vi ties duri ng certai n weather condi ti ons. 2. Measures shal 1 be taken to avoi d the deposi ti on of di rt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces and if tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces these must be immpdiately cleaned, 3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parkign areas, and access roads) must be controlled as far as the emission of dust due to travelling on the surfaceso This may be accomplished by periodic applications of high quality "°clean" gravel or an acceptable dust palliativeo The applicant is advised that if dust emissions from these surfaces becomes a problem the Air Pollution Control Authority may require the owner to mitigate the problem. ~ DATED THIS 24 DAY OF Aprila 1986, omas G. Mo e, A Zoning Adjus or Spokane County Washington FILED: 1) Applicant 2) Parties of Record 3) Spobcane County Engineers Office 4) Spokane County Health District 5) Spobcane County Uti 1iti es Dept. 6) Spokane County Dept. of Building b Safety 7) Spokane County Ai r Pol l uti on Control Authori ty PIOTE: ANY PARTY AGGRIEVED BY THIS DECISION MUST FILE Atd APPEAt. WITHIN TEId (10) CALEPdOAR DAYS OF THIS DATE. 0057z/4-86 ~ ~