The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-020-95 ~4 / S ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEA1tING EXAIVIINER COIVIMITTEE FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLiJSIO1vS A1VI) OItDEIt INTRODUCTgO1V Tlus matter has come before the Heanng Exanuner Committee on July 20, 1995 The members of the Committee present are Frank Yuse, Chair, Verona Southern and Toni Nersesian PROPOSAL The sponsor, The Evangehcal Lutheran Good Samantan Society, requests approval of a Zone Reclassification, ZE-20-95, from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) for an existing nursing home/retirement facillry and those uses allowed in the Urbaa Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, and a Vanance, VE-10-95, from the penmeter landscaping/fencing requuements specified by Section 14 620 365(2) of the Spokane Counry Zoning Code FINDINGS OF FACT ANI) C0NCLIJSIONS 1 The property is generally located west of and adjacent to Tschirley Road, both north and south of 8th Avenue in Section 19, Townslup 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Wastungton 2 The Committee adopts the Planiung Department Report as a part of this record 3 The existing land uses in the area include an existing retirement apartment build.ing, nursing home, parlang, mamtenance building, garages and single family residence with garage, single fanuly residences, agncultural and undeveloped 4 The proposed use is compatible with existuig uses in the area 5 The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban (L) and within the Aqulfer Sensitive Area (ASA) and the Prionty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Overlay zones The Urban (U) category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"city- like" envuonment wluch includes vanous land uses, a vanety of housing types and densities, and pubhc facilihes and services Urban areas will be the most intensely developed of all the categones, prunanly residential along with neighborhood commercial, light u►dustnal, and pubhc and recreational faclhties The proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) is consistent with and implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan 6 The proposed zorung does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan 7 The Artenal Road Plan designates Tschirley Road and Eighth Avenue each as Local Access Streets with a future right-of-way width of 60 feet Implementation of the . Artenal Road Plan does not presently requue dedication of additionai nght-of-way along either road as a Future Acqwsition Area 8 The existing zorung of the property descnbed in the application is Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) previously estabhshed as Agncultural (A) zoning in 1957 and redesignated to Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) on January l, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zorung Code The proposal does conform to the requirements of the proposed Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone 9 The provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied wrth and a Deternunation of Nonsignif'icance (DNS) was issued The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS 10 The legal requuements for public notice have been fulfilled 11 The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed zone reclassification The opponents testified that approval of the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone would establish a precedent for further sinular density zoning in an area of low-density residential zorung, the zone reclassification is an inadequate method to bnng non-confornung use into compliance with zorung, and that the zone reclassification is a questionable method to enable granting of building pernuts 12 The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the onginal zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassification is justified Specifically, changed cond.itions include adoption of the Comprehensive plan and more intensive residential use in the area 13 The proposed use will not be detnmental to the pubhc health, safety, morals or welfare especially in hght of the conditrons recommended by the reviewing agencies 14 The Committee additionally finds/concludes a Approval of the zone reclassification to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) does not establish a precedent for future land use actions in the area b The subject property does have unique physical features and special circumstances which support the proposed vanance from penmeter landscape and fencing requirements CONfl)ITI0NS OR CO1V'I'INGE1v1CIES APPLIEI) TO THIS APPROVAL 1 All Conditions unposed by the Heanng Exanuner Committee shall be bind.ing on the "Applicant," wluch term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest 2 The Zone Reclassification and following Conditions of Approval apply to the real property descnbed below That portion of Government Lot 2, Section 19, T 25 N, R 45 E, W M lying South of the Plat of Apple Valley Estates 2nd Addition and that portion deeded to James and HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 2 • . ~ Lenore Wurth dated November 5, 1986, together with the North 609 99 feet of the S W 1/4 of Section 19, T 25 N, R 45 E, W M EXCEPT the East 1335 57 feet thereof, Spokane County, Wastungton SPOKANE COLJNTY DIVISION OF BUII.I)I1VG Ali1I) PLANNING 1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended 2 Approval requued by the Planrung Duector/designee of a specific hghtuig and sigrung plan for the descnbed property prior to the release of any builduig pernuts 3 Duect hghting from any extenor area lightulg fixture shall not exceed over the property boundary 4 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance witrun the concept presented to the Heanng Body Variations, when approved by the Planning Director/designee, may be pernutted, including, but not hiruted to builduig location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All vanations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 5 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special conditions unposed as a result of approval of land use action Tlus Title Notice shall serve as pubhc notice of the conditions of approval affectuig the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded within the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, ui full or in part, by the Division of Buflding and Planrung The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows T'he parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the suibject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Admnnistrative Official on [ imposing a variety of special developanent conditions. File No. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County PDanning Department. 6 The Division of Btulding and Planrung shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, withun the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final dlsposition, includuig lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows "Prior to the issuance of any buildsng permit for any building or any use on the property descnbed herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The property wluch is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows " 7 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be subrrutted with a performance bond for the project pnor to release of building pernuts Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impa.ired HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 3 s 4 8 Applicant must aggregate parcels under one parcel number Aggregation requues a Certificate of Exemption 9 The applicant shall contact the Division of BLUlding and Planrung at the earhest possible stage in order to be uiformed of code requirements adnurustered/enforced as authonzed by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, budding accessibihty, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, extenor wall protection, and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Buildings reserves the nght to confum the actual address at the time of buflding pernut ) SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISI0N OF E1VGINEERING 1 No conditions of approval for this request based on the site plan of record SPOKANE COIJIVTY DIVISION OF UTII.ITIES 1 A Covenant shall be signed stating The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place theu- name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94, which petition includes the Owner(s)' property, and further not to object by sigrung of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the Owner(s)' property PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of unprovements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94 2 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer connection pernut is requued 3 Applicant is required to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement pnor to issuance of permit to connect 4 Applicant shall subtrut expressly to Spokane County Utilitles Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for Public Sewer connections for review and approval by the Utilities Department pnor to issuance of pernut to connect 5 Arrangements for payments of additional sewer charges must be made for pnor to issuance of sewer connection pernut 6 The Board of County Commissioners is in the process of evaluating whether Pubhc Sewer should be extended outside the 15-year construction boundary and the terms of connection/extension of public sewer if allowed 7 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 4 a SPOKANE COUNTY HEAI.TH DI3TRICT 1 Sewage dzsposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water service shall be coorduiated through the Duector of Utihties, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an e3usting pubhc water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Depamnent of Health 4 A pubhc sewer system currently exists for the project Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized 5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 5 . OR~ER The Hearing Exanuner Comnuttee, pursuant to the above Find.ings of Fact and Conclusion, APPROVES the application vf The Evangehcal Lutheran Good Samantan Society far the Zone Peclassificatron from Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) for an exrsting nursing home/rettrement facilhty and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, an.d a Var7ance from the penmeter landscapin.g/fencing requirements specified by Section 14 620 365(2) of the Spokane County Zorung Code as descnbed in the application ZE-20-95/VE-10-95 Motion by Verona Southem Seconded by Toni Nersesian Vote (2-1) TO APPROVE THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND VARIANCE REQUEST HEARING R COMMITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE AB(7VE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE HAIR ` . . ATTEST For STACY BJORDA.HL Actulg P1ubhc Heanngs Manager By~'` HN W P ERSON Seruor Planner ~ . G1`E Pursuant to Spokane County regulations, any aggneved party has the nght to appeal this wntten decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the sigaing of this order Upon recetpt of an appeal, a public heanng will be scheduled if you desue to file such an appeal, you must subnut a wntten appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of Counry Commissioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$215 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer If you have any questians, please call the Planrung Department at (509) 456-2205 HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 6 r t 0 ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET REZONE FILE # ZE-020- Related File # ( VE-010-95 ) Date to Review 07-20-95 # 3 Date to AA & DR 05-24-95 Time 1:15 Date Received 05-10-95 Project Name UR 3.5 TO UR-12 NURSING HOME RETIREMENT APTS No. Lots 86 No.Acres 31 Range - Township - Section SITE ADDRESS N-S 8TH-W TSHIRLEY PARCEL # 19552-9013 9041;9056 19553-9023 Applicant's Name SPO VALLEY GOOD SAMARITAN VILLAGE Phone # 924-6161 Address JIM DROPPERS Phone 2# 17121 E 8TH GREENACRES WA 99016 FLOOD ZONE YES W _ S _ School 356 Date Conditions mailed Owner EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's LAWRENCE L LEINWEBER Address GSS Address 106 W MISSION STE 206 Phone PO BOX 5038 Phone / Fax SPOKANE WA 99201 SIOUX FALALS SK 57117-5038 328-3371 605)362-3198 Planning Contact Persoa KEN KUHN Phone # 456-2205 Date Submitted Description Initials AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES OR PRIORITY FEE COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE TO PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HEARING EXAM APPROVED _DENIED =APPEALED BBC / PROJECT _APPROVED _DENIED BOND QUANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZANNE) / / STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) ~ tl ENGINEER' S REVIEW SHEET BLDG. PERMIT # -or -FILE# 7 F~-- Related File # ( ) Date to Review Time # Date to AA & DR 05/24/95 Time 1:15 Date Received 05/10/95 Project Name UR 3.5 TO UR-12 NURSING HOME RETIREMENT APTS No. Lots No.Acres 31 ~ Section - Township - Range SITE ADDRESS N/S 8TH/W TSHIIZLEY PARCEL # 19552-9013-1-- Applicant's Name EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GSS/JIM DROPPERS Phone # 924-6161 Address 17121 E 8TH-GREENACRES WA 99016 Work # ~ Date Conditions mailed Contact person Phone # FLOOD ZONE ✓ YES W S SCHOOL 356 Engineer / Surveyor's / Architect's Name LAWRENCE L LEINWEBER 106 W MISSION STE 206 SPOKANE WA 99201 ; 328-3371 Planning Contact Person KEN KUHN Phone # 456-2205 Date Submitted Description Initials AGREEMENT TO PAY FEES COMPLETEp & COPY TO ACCOUNTING FINAL PLAT FEES COMPLETED & COPY TO ACCOUNTING NOTICE '$O PUBLIC # 1 3 4 6 COMPLETED - OR NEEDS TO BE SIGNED DESIGN DEVIATION SUBMITTED ALTERATION TO PLAT - BLOCKS & LOTS BOND RELEASED -ROAD & DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS HEARING EXAM APPROVED _DENIED-_APPEALED BBC / PROJECT _APPROVED _DENIED BOND QL4ANTITIES FOR DRAINAGE ITEM CALCULATED STAMPED MYLARS TO PERMIT TECHNICAN (SYL/SUZANNE) , STAMPED 208 LOT PLANS TO ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (SANDY) f . ~ I - - ~ ~ t J' ~ r ~ • - - v` ~-Ck.~.-t , "Aa ~ '.~►l~v~C - ~ ~ U o c2 ~ ~ ~ RECavED UL :l!' 1995 ZE=20=95NE=10=95 CauaU Engioeering , , LK I AV' ~ . J~ A . 13 . I S • . • 4 u 1 'z • T OFFI i~ o .k.►+ AvX M 1N V ¢ 00~ ,V ~ . . ..n ~~~•~:i..''~~ '.rt:.V'^c,• •EL~ir#2 ~FL .F'049 ° . - r ~ . ~ ~C•M. ST. P~ P R.R Go- Z ~ ST ~ _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ _ L`~- - - • f f 2 N D • 2 ndA ' r ' ' ' • p~~ie ~ ~ 3 ~ Z LN ' U T w ' . us •*~r E eRTcE ~ELLEY Al14 ( j~~'r ~ ' 1 GHT H AV E . . - `so/~ 12Th AvE t ' V e. y I i i ~ • l a~ I • O ~ ` I at'st ~ ~ ~ ~ . J~~ ' • . 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95/VE-10-95 Page 26 , ZEm20w95NE=j0-=95 1 1 WS ; "F ~ R _~v. A. ~ w~~, ~ - UR7 . 2 ..v.lL ' 8.2 a,~ ~ o ST ~F B' 2 M 11rt 2 ~.J V ~ ~ ' ~ • ~7 Q v ' . J R- . V UR• ~ I-z 22 3MM3 p C.M. tvR R r IsrO UR-2Z ~ ~ ' • ~ ~ 7 , ~ , UR-7 s t621 o ~ ~ 2 ,,dA~ , ~~~~e~ 3 Ro k r 1' Z ~ + ~ . ~ w URT ~ ~ V ~ :L~ ~ • ~ .4 E. Itl` lSf' . r E rD Rp,. E'LL~'Y v- 4f, 09 ~1•~~~~ ~ - KL~ , ~ . V`• rH A . f ~rs.. lGHTH qvE . ~.~r.. Y ~ a.i/ O / ra . ' 1 \!Z , E ~ T a~'E ~ - , • - . . ~ ~ . ~ . o~ c v" , . ~ 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20_95/VE_ 10-95 / ~ Page 27 . t . ZE=20=9 NE=10=95 ~ . ~-j • , ~ : - _ -~,a. ' `MIS$ION _ _ ~ ` . . . . . • • . . ~ Y• - _ B M A vE-- ~(1r~;~,: ' ' ' , _ ' • • ' 4: . : ~ ~ : ~ . ~ . ,e..yyT • ~ a~!'=~••••...• «-.-.ji: ' ' i1 r . P • ° ~We{tS - ' ' ~ . ; . • G reenacres • : ~ . , . ~ _ • ~ • . . .1 " 3• IN~ _ • ' ~ • . . . • • . , 6UR~ - l~ , . . - 10J1~ ~ - ~ : i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ w . e . ~ a. . , i., - ' e • : ~ y~~c . . • w• • • ~ ~ • • : i~ . '0 1 ~ O, 1 S ' ~ • „ • • • ~ • • f'~ • _ ■ _ ° le ~ 'a ( ~ ~.*18. - • - • • • . • •n•~~,w •M.~~ . . ~,.•e • ~ ~ • ' a e : .~i:1 ~ . - ° ~ ~ o :r,: ~ • . ~ . • • ` ~ ° ° . a . • ~ . a ~ • • 0••~~~~• • ~ • ~ i' ~ . - hq • . . ~ _ - . ~ .1+~ IO~I T ~ ~ • ' • • o J 3; . • ~ . . _ . ; ~ ~ ; ~ , . ~ C. ~ ~ • ' r' x = ~ I ~ 'L. ~ _ r _ . . . . ~ ' • . ~ • . • ~ • • ~ ' ~ • , Y.fiutY • ~ ~ =L. : ' _ - •WAY•• i~ • : : . • i• ~ • • 0 0 • • . _ ' ~ • ~ • . _ ' Jr Hi=h :eN -•y••'`' . . • .:r . • n ' '-:2038 " 200 4.. a • • • . •F . . 1• ~ : • ~ Veradale . , 3 , . o~, _~..l..,t, ~O ~i..• ..~Y4 ~O ~ .I ~O~• • ~ ~ •T~1~~ • ~ • • J • I.ANE=~• a ~ 7 ~ • . • • C-~S..:T~~ ~ = . ~ ~ 1~ ' ~ ~ ' . . • : rC . , . • . .M~ ~ . . ~ . . 1'JO~S ' • ~ ~ o~ oo a• ' - _ - • • . : • • o SPRAGU~!P 7 ~ • • T PA I PACIFI . E,Vera': - • . , - ' . (;_~y~•• ~ Gravei Pitr. . ' • " " ' ~ •~w~ • ♦TM ~ • ~ ~ ~ • • ~ AVf • ~ ~ ( 1 fajler • ' ~ 10S/ • • ~ •1 , .-a;:- N~- 3;~::;_ : • _ . O . i Psrk . . . . . . ~ . . . a o ' . . . . - . ` • • • ~ • n o ~ . ~ j ~ . rb~ f • , • I ' ; y~ D • • • • • ~ ~a a z 19 : • . • . • _ . cenv,i v.n.r 24 • ~ • o ~ I~ HiRA SeA ~ St ie ofsGOSaI . ~ ~ r O \ ~ Gr1ve1 P~1/~• . :C .i: (J • ~ , ' ~ , ~ ~ . J, . . .?h'ki: . Pit 7083 ~vE. ~ z. _ " ' ~I :~I►. . .Y;'~ 'Y.Y.Y.•7►' _ ~ - r r. •~t~• ~ ~ .l•~•.' ~ ~I :2~ , = :•f.'.••'•'•'•' ~ ~ $ ry . ~ ~ ~ ~ _ :.++iaie~'~'~' - ~ : • "o ~ ~•'~~~'~i 'T ~ ..-r+l AVE =:':~r ' ' ' - - . :{:'•'•'r::•:::::::•:•:•:•:•:••'•'•'•'•' ` / " ~ .~.'.•...•.•r..•.,•'••i:•:•:•:•:•:• ~ • ~ • ' :ti•2)dl•' • • ~ • , : .X~~•.•:•' ' ~ . ✓ / \`1 , :,,,e' .I .::::..:::::::::i::::: ~d:::~_ :1:~:~.~:•.~:~.•.~.•:•:~: ' )c / eM .(•:•:~~••~:•:~.-..::~.cr.ng . * . . I ' 2057 A TESE' HaIf M ? l 29 • / ; . ~ , ' C!m • ~ ` . ~ • - _ -1 . . i - . P 6 31 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95/VE-10-95 Page 28 ~ - f ; • _ iiiiilllllloo ~ { , • • , ~ ~ ' • . • . ' / ' ~ p ~ 1' . 1 ~ . 7 ` : ~i~r~n ` ~ ` ' ~ ~ 1n~' ~ • • • ♦ , t • ' ~ ~ • ~ • - . 12 • • ~ ~ , . • ~ • . • , ~ ~ ~ Y ¢ VE f. ~ . ~ ~ • • 2010 1 A ~ , . ~ . ' • 5~ ~ ~ ~ , r ~ • {~ar~ . ~ r "a 11'~~ , • ' I : ~ ' • ' ` ' . . ~ ~ ~ f • - ..."Ooo 1 • ~ • ` ~ ~ . ~ • ~ 1~~.~ ~ • _ .r.-`~ ~ , Gxeena~r~s i~ . . : _ . , / , ' ' '.u , . • , _ : i , . ` . ~ ' 3zn~-'-.;.~. f ' " ' ' s" ~ ' ~ ~p • s • 1 ~ . 4b 703n •y ~ ~ ~ . R, • . \I • ~ 1 ' ~ Y • ~ ~ ` 4p • ~ ~ ~ . ~ • h •J'~,•.- ~ ~ t7 ~ • ~ 4 1~ . ~ ~ ' ~y `~,J/~j _ , ' o , ••C - . ^ . . r ~ ~ . . . ~ ~A~ . . . _ ,f:- ~ ~ • ~ ~ . . ~,,~,.J - • ~ • 1 • • • •`I~ ~ • • ~ 1` ~ • =o; , ~ :,t: ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1 ♦ ~ • • 1 n ~~~1~~•~• ~ .2p_l~ •,i,.. 1 s : ~ ~a~ ~ ~ • • ' ~ ~ • ~ ~t • ~{fIF~~~qN ~ . • . y1 T~ • ~ ~ • ' ~ 1' ~ ~ •s • a 'f 5C" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t•y Y,I ' • ~ • n ~JCh ■ ' . ~ •1~~~` ' ~i• , '~^~_jj`,j{ ~ ~ ~ S~~'. . ..1~:'•_.•~.' ~45 e • • p . ~ ~ ' ~ j ~ • G ~ • ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ • • ~ °,S t,,~ • F V •j}~i ~ ~s•.~ . ~ l. V A L : ~ ~ . ~ • ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ • . . , Q ra,~a~~ .~1: _ , `a. ' ` v • ~ , , • . ~ ~~Tl~'i ' „1 . , . ~ . • ' t ~'~t'~~i . ~ ~ ~ • ~ l l~~f ~i t ~Q: ---1 •ii` q , . ♦ , f•• • t t f . ~ 1r/ I 5 i ~ ~ • ' , ~ 5p~~~ ~ ler_ i•. ' " + • 1. " ~ ~ ~ ~ • . n • •~r sT (',rave~P~~f• r~ K~~ ~ 1; .t. • ~ n : 1 . . • ~ + y~,;i' ,t ~ c~ • _ ~il.~• ( p"~ ~ J t~~'~b`~•~' Q ' ; ~ . . . ~ C, r a~r WsPosa d yl •ZQ ` G) 7~) ,J~ • • n V+' 1 • I' sl ~1 a►laq ' . . I 1. ` ' • . . ' oop ~ t'rntr h v ~ ~ 1104 q • O~ ' ' . . . ' ~ OM 20 ~ n 4 2056 " • , ~ • , . . w r . ~ _-.T., - . . r ~ nk u . ~ . : ~ , ~ r..r t . ~ i , ' • : _ . ~ ~ Waeef ~ V 4 . 1 + •~8 ` I ' , r ~ z pa 2- a Q . ~ ~ j i J Q w~euwo ~uowl~ f W p i CL U sbu!41 Pa~ wa41o puv ari~~al~yP~o tim }~,ym u~ w •v v14ot3 ►:Il6 I..a w r •i•,• w ~w+, ~r ' ♦ Q ` ~ aiiuu W J,N1iii1aan11 ffj 30vIIin rvdliddwvs (IooE) r N . , , dayeA euo~oag ~ Z 02 N ~ - ~ L < . ~ ~ ~ y ~ Y ~ •o g . ~ ~ OVOtl A3'kllqSl • ~'~f i"-.. " t' ' •-os ~N • • 7. i0. /o ,ON ~y a ~ b ~ ~ w ~ ~.4m d~ ►.k: ' C !n Z • ~ N 3 r ~ t TmlTu ~ ~ • _ ~ ~ I I I I~~~ ~ I I I I I I I I ~ a ~ ~ ~ I1 Ll ll ~ 1 ~ ~ t-•~~ y~ ( \ ~ r.J,~y {^t7•w•.. ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ . k ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ' . ~ ~ - ~ ~ I . ~ ' , ~ ~2 • ~ ' ~ ( ,,.s. iv , ic s. •ti , . +e w, 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Paqe 30 . ► . DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING REPORT TO: SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE: JULY 209 1995 SUBJECT: ZE-20-95, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL-12 (UR-12) AND VE-10-95, A VARIANCE FROM PERIMETER LANDSCAPING/FENCING REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Jim Droppers, Administrator Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village East 17121 Eighth Avenue Spokane, WA 99016 (509) 924-6161 Owner: The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society P. O. Box 5038 Sioux Falls, SD 57117-5038 (605) 362-3198 Agent: Timothy L. Rundquist North 10 Post, Suite 601 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 838-4255 Contact Planner: Kenneth Kuhn Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to Tschirley Road, both north and south of 8th Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWNi, Spokane County, Washington. Proposal: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) for an existing nursing home/retirement facility and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, and a Variance from the perimeter landscaping/fencing requirements specified by Section 14.620.365(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code. II. SITE INFORMATION A. Site Size: Approximately 31 acres. 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 31 . ~ B . Coanprehensive Plan 1. Land Use Plan: The property is located within the Urban (U) category of the Comprehensive Plan, the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) and the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) The Urban (U) category is intended to provide the oppomuuty for development of a"city-lilce" envuonment which includes vanous land uses, a variety of housing types and densities, and pubhc facdities and services Urban areas will be the most intensely developed of all the categones, pnmanly residential along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and pubhc and recreational faclhties Public facilities will include a nursing home/retirement faciliry The proposal is located in an area that is part.ially developed and established with a vanety of residentaal densities and few pubhc facilities The proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) is consistent with and implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan 2. Arterial Road Plan The site is west of and adjacent to Tschirley Road, and north and south of Eighth Avenue The Spokane County Artenal Road Plan identrfies Tsclurley Road and Eighth Avenue each as Local Access Streets with a future right-of-way width of 60 feet Implementation of the Artenal Road Plan does not presently require dedicahon of add.itionai nght- of-way along either road as a Future Acquisitlon Area C. Site Characteristics The northwest portion of the site is relatively level and bordered on the north and west by basalt mounds which end in cliffs These chffs form the north boundary of the property The south one-third of the site consists of a fairly steep hillside of shrubs and trees with an easterly-flowing dralnage The east and northeast portions of the site aie of fairly even, sloping ground The north two-tturds of the site slopes gradually to the east The center of the site contalns two former sewage lagoons classified by the Spokane County Wetlands Inventory Maps as Permanent Lakes D. Neighborhood Characteristics Along the north boundary of the property below the cliffs is Saltese Creek, north of which is a flat residential area Immedsately to the east of the site is Saltese Creek, with some residential development to its north and a steep wooded hillside on its south To the west the ground gradually rises to basalt mounds, then cliffs Below these cliffs is a southerly-flowing drainage and relatively flat hay fields Directly south is a steep, wooded hillside E . Zoning Analysis Proposal Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously established as Agncultural (A) (286-57) North Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) estabhshed in 1991, previously established as Residenual Mobile Home (RMH) (24-70) (92-73) South Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) and Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) established in 1991, previously established as Agncultural (A) (286-57) 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 32 , East Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously established as Agricultural (A) (286-57) West Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established in 1991, previously established as Agncultural (A) (60-42) The zoning trend in the general area of the proposal is predominantly Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5), with Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to the north, and Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) to the south and southwest The most recent zone reclassification in the area consists of approximately 25 acres immediately to the north of the proposal wluch changed from Agncultural (A) to Residential Mobile Home (RMH) (92-73) in 1973 F . I.and LJse Arnalysis Srte A five-story retuement apartment building, one-story nursing home, extensive paved parlang, garages, two maintenance buildings, and a single-farruly residence with garage North Single-family residential South Vacant/undeveloped East Single-farruly residential and agncultural West Vacant and agricultural Land use in the general area of this proposal is very rruxed, with single-fanuly residential generally to the north and northeast, agriculture to the east and west, and vacant, wooded hillside to the south The existing nursing home/retirement facihty is a pernutted use in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone and is generally compatible with existing land uses to the north of the site G. Circulation The site currently has duect access to Eighth Avenue The site plan shows no change in the access use/requirements to Eighth Avenue H . I)esign 1 . Site Plan Data Proposed Site Plan: The site plan of record illustrates one future carport for vans, one future maintenance building, and potential addition to the gatehouse along with the existing nursing home, ret.irement apartments, garage, maintenance buildings, and parking lots/spaces Except for building height of the retuement apartments, fencing and landscaping, the site plan does illustrate general compliance with nununum development standards of the proposed Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone Proposed Buffering/I.andscaping Techniques The proposed site plan illustrates 20 feet of Type III landscaping along only part of the Tscturley Road frontage and along approximately 190 feet of the easternmost reach of Eighth Avenue Chapter 14 806 (Landscaping and Screening Standards) of the Zoning Code requires a 20-foot wide strip of Type III landscaping along all local access streets witlun all developments in 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 33 t_ the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone Chapter 14 806 (Landscaping and Screenuig Standards) of the Zomng Code also reqiures a minimum of 10 feet of Type I landscaping where pubhc or institutional uses are adjacent to a Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) or Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone Not illustrated is that requued 10 feet of Type I landscaping, which is the subject of the Vanance request that accompanies tlus Zone Reclassification proposal The site plan shall demonstrate compliance with Zoning Code landscaping standards along local access streets pnor to issuance of buddulg pernuts Other Site Plan Considerations The site plan subrrutted for review by the Heanng Exanuner Comnuttee illustrates e3ustulg and proposed structures Detailed review to deternune comphance with all Code regulahons and conditions of approval is recommended to be adrrurustrative and to occur at the Building Permrt stage I. Variance Analysis: The applicant has requested a Variance to delete the penmeter fencing requuement defined in Chapter 14 620 365(2) and the landscaping requirement defined in Chapter 14 806 040(1)(e) of the Spokane Counry Zorung Code The fencing standard is A six (6) foot-high concrete, masonry or decoratave block wall, solid landscaping, or site-obscurang fence shall be provided and maintacned on the boundary of any UR-12 zone which abuts or lies across a publtc alley from an RR-10, SRR-S, SRR-2, SR-1, SR-112, UR-3 S or RS zone, except cn the required front yard, tivhere the fence shall comply with Sectzon 14 810 020 Thts provtsaon supplenients, but does not replace, j equtrenzents for landscape setbacks along adjacent property lcnes of residential zoning as set forth in Secnon 14 806 040 The landscaping standard, as defined in Chapter 14 806 040(1)(e), states that when the proposed use is public or institutional in all zones and that use is adjacent to an Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) or Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone, then the rrununum landscaping required is Type I, 10 feet in width where the proposed use is adjacent to either of the above two zones The applicant has requested a Variance from the fence and landscaping standards as requued in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone Specifically, the applicant is requesting allowing the existing rock cliff at the east end of the north property hne to serve as the "site-obscuring device" without additional fencing or landscaping Variance Cntena (Chanter 14 404 080) 1 Any variance froni the terms of the Zoning Code shall be subject to such conditaons as wtll (a) ensure that the adjustment shall not constztute a grant of specaal prcvalege anconscstent wcth the lcmctanons upon other properties in the vcccnity and similar zone reclassaficatcon in whlch the properzy is sttuated, (b) ensure that the cntent and purpose of the Zonang Code cs maintacned wath regard to locatton, scte desagia, appearance, landscaping and other feature of the proposal, and (c) protect the environment, public rnterest and general welfare, and that the following crrcumstances are found to apply 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 34 ~ a Because of special circumstances applccable to the property, includang saZe, shape, topography, location or surroundcngs, the stract applacanon of the Zoning Code creates prachcal dcfficultces and is found to deprcve the property of rights and prcvileges enjoyed by other propertaes in the vccinity and samilar zone classaficanon, and b That grantcng of the varcance will neither be materially detrimental to the publac welfare nor cnjuraoccs to the property or improvements in the vccinity and zone in whcch the property cs located Itesponse: 1 a The site does have special cucumstances due to its location atop an often vertical-rock border formation wluch forms much of its north property luie-- it is visually more prorrunent than structures/development on the nearby level ground Tlus topograplucal feature does not necessanly create any more difficulty in meeting the fencing and landscaping requuements per the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone and may increase the need for a " site- obscunng device" from neighboring residential uses due to the proriunent high ground which the site occupies 1 b If the variance is granted, adequate security on the site may not be provided for those elderly persons and visitors to this facility A six (6)-foot-high fence is intended to assure public health and safety on the site as well as to provide a visual barrier benefiting much less intensive neighbonng residential uses 2 The following, while not to be considered as sole substantiatcon, shall be considered in the grantcng of a variance a Strict applccation of the Zoning Code standard(s) creates an unreasonable burden in light of the purpose to be served by this Code, b Relaxation of the Zoncng Code standar d wall allow a more envaronmentally sensatave, energy conserving desagn or result in the adaphve reuse of an hcstoric property, or c A broader publtc or communcty need or cnterest wrll be served by granhng the variance as opposed to denyang the applacatcon Response: 2a Strict apphcation of the Zoning Code, specifically Chapters 14 620 365(2) and 14 806 040(1)(e), does not create an unreasonable burden for the applicant 2bc The broader public lnterest will not be served in granting the variance As required, the fencing will maintain secunty on the site and the landscaping will provide a visual buffer between very diffenng residential densities 3 The grantcng of a variance generully should not a Be substantially based upon precedent established by cllegal or nonconformcng ctrcumstances, 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 35 V b Establcsh a precedent whcch will adversely affect the zontng concept for an area or the County as a whole, c Be substannally based upon a lack of reasonable economic return or a claim that the existrng structure, re cs too small, d Result an a de facto zone reclassificanon fltesponse: 3a Does not apply to this proposal 3b Grantulg the vanance may establish a precedent if future multi-family developments occur in the sunounding area 3cd Does not apply to tlus proposal Variance Suinmary: The criteria for approval, as set forth in the Zoning Code, do not support the Variance request J. Power TransmissIlOn Lines/Other Known Easements: None illustrated Any recorded or required easements will be disclosed dunng the building pernut process K. Drainage: A drainage plan is not iequiied unless more density develops than is shown on the site plan L. VVater Supply The proposal is in the future service area of Consolidated Irngation District Water has been provided to the srte pnor to the creation of the Boundary Review Boazd (BRB), Spokane County Any future development of the site will require BRB approval for annexation or extension of service 1VI. Sewage Disposal Tlus site is already connected to a public sewer system N. School: The proposal is within Central Valley School District #356 No comments have been recerved from the Central Valley School District 0. Fire Proteetion The proposal is within Fire District No 1 The Fire Distnct and the Division of Buildings Department (Fire Marshall) are required to approve fire protection provisions prior to issuance of building permits P. Cultural Resources/Critical Areas: None have been identified Q. Departgnent of Parks, gtecreation and Fair: No response R . Wetlands: Spokane County Wetland Inventory Maps indicate the presence of wetlands on site Any future development in close proxinuty to these wetlands may warrant theu dehneation and establishment of protective buffer areas S. Tcansit: Spokane Transit Authority (STA) Route #9 (East Sprague) serves Sprague Avenue, approximately 1/2 rrule noith of the site 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 36 III. ENVIROlVMEIVTAL REVIEW ' An Envuonmental Checklist was subnutted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the Division of Btulding and Planrung The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines The Division of Building and Planrung has deternuned that "No probable sigruficant adverse impacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Deternunation of Nonsignificance ("DNS") The "DNS" was cuculated to 13 other agencies of junsdiction and other agencies/ departments affected by the future development for review and comment The "DNS" comment period ends July 18, 1995 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site The Heanng Exanuner may consider additional envuonmental related testunony at the public heanng I V. DIVISION OF BUIb,DING AND PLANNING SUIVINARY The proposed zone reclassification is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidellnes of the Urban category of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and generally implements the development standards of the Urban Residential-12 zone The Vanance is not consistent with the cnteria cited by Chapter 14 404 080 of the Spokane County Zoning Code If approved, the following conditions are recommended V . C0NI)I'TIONS OF APPROVAI, i. All conditions irreposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be bIlncling on the "Applicant", which terms shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors. i i. The zone ceclassification applies to the following real propecty: That portion of Government Lot 2, Section 19, T 25 N, R 45 E, W M lying South of the Plat of Apple Valley Estates 2nd Addition and that poi-tion deeded to James and Lenore Wirth dated November 5, 1986, together with the North 609 99 feet of the S W 1/4 of Section 19, T 25 N, R 45 E, W M EXCEPT the East 1335 57 feet thereof, Spokane County, Washington SPOKANE COiJN'TY IDIVISION OF BUII.DING ANI) PLANNING 1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone and the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended 2 Approval required by the Planning Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building pernuts 3 Direct lighting from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not exceed over the property boundary 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 37 . 4 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance witlun the concept presented to the Heanng Body Variations, when approved by the Planning Duector/designee, may be pernutted, including, but not luYUted to buuldhng location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pemutted zone All vanations must conform to regulatrons set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintained 5 The Planrung Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Tide Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of land use action Tlus Trtle Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded withul the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Planrung Department The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administratnve Official on [ irnposing a variety of special development conditions. File 1Vo. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 6 The Planning Department shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same ume frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Notice, wluch shall generally provide as follows "Prior to the issuance of any building pernut for any building or any use on the property descnbed herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly descnbed as follows " 7 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Plannuig Director/designee shall be subrrutted with a performance bond for the project pnor to release of building pernuts Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired 8 Apphcant must aggregate pazcels under one parcel number Aggregation requires a Certificate of Exemption 9 The applicant shall contact the Division of Buildings at the earhest possible stage in order to be informed of code requuements administered/enforced as authonzed by the State Build.ing Code Act Design/development concerns include Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, extenor wall protection, and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Buildings reserves the right to confirm the actual address at the trme of building perrnit ) SPOKANE COtJNT'Y DIVISI0N OF ENGIIVEERING 1 No conditions of approval for this request based on the site plan of record 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 38 ~ S1POKANE COUIVTY DIVISION OF UTILgTI]ES 1 A Covenant shall be signed stating The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place theu name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94, which petition includes the Owner(s)' property, and further not to object by sigrung of a protest petrtion against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the Owner(s)' property PROVIDED, tlus condition shall not prolubit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunchon with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94 2 A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer connection pernut is required 3 Applicant is required to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement pnor to issuance of pernut to connect 4 Apphcant shall subnut expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for Public Sewer connecuons for review and approval by the Utilities Department pnor to issuance of pernut to connect 5 Arrangements for payments of additional sewer charges must be made for prior to issuance of sewer connection pernut 6 The Board of County Conumssioners is in the process of evaluating whether Public Sewer should be extended outside the 15-year construction boundary and the terms of connectlon/extension of public sewer if allowed 7 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended SPOKANE COUNTY HEAI.TH I)IST1tICT 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Healtli 4 A public sewer system currently exists for the project Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized 5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited 7/95 HEC Staff Report for ZE-20-95 Page 39 ~ OFF T CE OF TNE COUIUTY EhIG T IVEER SPOk AhlE LC]UIVTY p WA51-i I NGT0N Jit1y 7q t9D5 Too SpoE ane G-Duiii:y i'] annirlq DQpzartment (Current Planninq Admir7istrator ) Frnm~ Spezn~anE C-DUnty Engznc?er9 s Department(:35&6~ SUbjecto Conditir-Ina of Appr-Dval Zc-ne Ghange hl-:,o ZF_a)_95 Appla.cants Name Good__aamara.tan_Villagg Section 19s Tc-wnship~2r N, ~Range 45~EWh`l r-e-._Z~ ~ninq The fc-1 1c-winq "Cr-iriditions of Approva1 " f.--,r tr~e above refer--pnr_ed zone chanqe a~~~ SLtbmitted tr_- the SpoF ane C.-nunty He~..ar-inq E,•,,-Aminer Commii:tee foY i n c 1Us.Ion 1 I"1 tri P "P 1 a n n i n q R E FJ oYt" cl i'1 C~ ~~Fin d -Lng5 ar'1 Ij Q 1' dE' Y' " of the pub 1 i c I-iear in q s r_ hed Lt] ed Ju1y_.-'0g_ 199[5 a Based ~--.n tl-ie site plan c-f recc-rd si_tbma.tted wztl-i this reqLtest nc- ad d i L- a. ona1 Ltnits are bein g r- eqLtestecl o TFij. s► r~ zc-ri Fi, to b r a. ri q t F~ ~ exxsta.iiq facil.ity irii;o cc-mpliance with a compata.ble Zone9 anci the adrlitian c-f cztrp-Drts wa.11 not iiicreasE tra~fir on adaarent streetso Spc-E ane Cciunty Eriqa.neerinq has no conditzcins ~M-f appr----val for this r-eyLtest laased on the sxte p1an ofi rPccircio ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee(;Report•Viewi-zrueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, °PAGE 1 12 41 14 'll MAY 1995 ° °Road# Road Names . MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info 001420 FLORA PIT RD (START) 00.000 SULLIVAN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 200 ° FLORA PIT RD (END) 01.000 FLORA PIT COUNTY SHO U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20 001344 FLORA RD (START) 00.000 SOUTH END TO 5TH QVE U 19 PAVED 300 ° FLORA RD 00 030 STH AV (START) U 19 PAVED 30 ° 00 080 4TH AV U 19 PAVED 300 ° 00 150 3RD AV (START) U 19 PAVED 40 ° 00.340 SPR.AGUE AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM 220 ° 00.460 MAIN AV (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM 22 ° 00.580 VALLEYinTAY AV ( END ) U 16 L I GHT B I TUM . 220 ° 00 730 ALKI AV (START) U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 22 ° ' 00 840 BROADWAY AV U 16 LIGHT BITUM. 220 ° 01 040 CATALDO AV (START) U 16 PAVED 20 ° 01.100 BOONE AV (START) U 16 PAVED 200 ° 01 350 MISSION AV U 16 PAVED 20 ° 01.530 BALDWIN AV (START) U 16 PAVED 200 ° 01 590 INDIANA AV (END) U 16 PAVED 20 ° FLORA RD (END) 01 750 MONTGOMERY AV (START U 16 PAVED 200 001345 FLORA RD (START) 00 000 SOUTH END TO EUCLID U 17 PAVED 20 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef °List ° °Use Direction Keys to View Report (Press [F1] for help) c] -Exit ° uaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(; °Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page ° , , ~ $ i Y r ieeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegReport Viewerueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee, °PAGE 4 12 40 03 11 MAY 1995 0 °Road# Road Names . MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info. . ° 8TH AVE 03 130 CALVIN ST U 16 PAVED 220 ° 8TH AV 03.200 WARREN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 32 ° 03 290 ADAMS RD U 16 PAVED 220 ° 03 330 MARCUS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 ° 03.380 MARIGOLD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 220 ° 03 450 BURNS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 ° 03 540 PROGRESS RD U 16 PAVED 220 ° 8TH AV (END) 03.790 SULLIVAN RD U 16 PAVED 22 ° 0 5 8 6 8 8 TH AV ( START ) 00 000 LONG RD ( START ) U 19 GR.AVEL 140 ° 8TH AV 00 500 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM 18 ° 01 010 HODGES RD (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 180 ° Ol 210 COLONIAL DR (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 18 ° 01 330 GLENBROOK ST (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 180 ° STH AV (END) 01 510 HENRY RD 005867 8TH AV (START) 00.000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 200 ° 8TH AV (END) 00.240 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) 005869 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE 00 000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 GR.AVEL 120 ° 00 020 MCKINZIE RD (LIBERTY R 09 GR.AVEL 12 aeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeef °List ° °Use Direction Keys to Vi!aw Report (Press [F1] for help) ° uaaaaaaeaaaaaaeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaq °Esc-Exit Enter-Next Page ° ~ ~ 4 ~ , . • May 24, 1995, 1 15 p m GOOD S AN VII.,LAGE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION FROM URBAN RESIDENTIAL 3 5(UR-3.5) TO URBAN RESIDENTIAL 12 (UR-12) Generally located west of and adjacent to Tschuley Road, both north and south of 8th Avenue in Section 19, Townslup 25 N, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Urban, and withln Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING Urban Residennal3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Reszdenhal 12 (LJR-12) PROJECTION DESCRIPT'ION Zone Reclassification from Urban Residentia13.5 (UR-3 5) to Urban ResidentW 12 (UR-12) for an exisang Nursing Home and Retirement Apartments planned car ports, and those uses allowed in the Urban Residentia112 (UR-12) zone PARCEL #(S) 55192 9013 55192 9056 55193 9041 SITE SIZE Approximately 31 acres APPLICANT: The Evangehcal Lutheran Good Samantan Society % Jun Droppers, Admunistrator East 17121 8th Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 924-6161 ASSIGNED PLANNER• Ken Kuhn . . S P O K A N E -~i°~'A C O U N T Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLfS D HUDDARD, DIRFC'TOR MEMORANDUM RECEIVED Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering MAY 10 1995 TO: Brenda Sims, Storm Water Utility SPO►caNE ~Jim Red, Spokane County Utilities Department f-~1~~NEER Steve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Parks & Recreation Department Greg Figg Department of Transportation Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Central Valley School District Consolidated Irrigation District Fire Protection District No. 1 FRO • John W. Pederson, Senior Planner DATE: May 8, 1995 RE: Good Samaritan Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential 12 (UR-12) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING May 24. 1995 AT 1: 15 P.M. COUNTY PL,ANNING CONFERENCE ROOM, 2ND FLOOR Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPrI'ANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Planning Department encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Ken Kuhn for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DE.SIGN REVIEw Fo12MS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Planning Department file (so bring thrgg copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperarion. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Ken Kuhn of the Planning Department at 456-2205. c: Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society-Jim Droppers, Administrator Attachments: Application Acceptance and Design Review Form, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WEST BROADWAl' AVENUr • SroxnNe, WnstitNCroN 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205 • FAX: (509) 456-2243 • TDD: (509) 324-3166 _ , s % DETERMYNATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) . SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCLRECEIVE['. FILE NUMBER(S): ZE-20-95/VE-10-95 g, O DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassification from Urban Residciitial--`)J (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) for an existing nursing home/retirement facility and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, and a Variance from the perimeter landscaping/fencing requirements specified by Section 14.620.365(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code. APPLICANT: Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village Jim Droppers, Administrator 17121 East 8th Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 924-6161 OWNER: The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Sociery P O Box 5038 Sioux Falls, S D j771 1?-.~7n (605) 362-319 ~ LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located west of and adjacent to Tschirley Road, both north and south of 8th Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNIENT DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., July 18, 1995, if theN d!r(e lp~te;~cLsd to alter the DNS. ##########ftft##lt#####ff#lt##ft####ft##fr#ltiFlt7tftffft7f####4rrrrtrff trt~f~t~rt fr~rtt~ RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR By: Kenneth Kuhn, Planner I Phone: (509) 456-2205 Address: Spokane County Division of Building and Planning West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 . DATE ISSUED: 1995 SIGNATURE• .~~Cr~~ CMWEIsM RFGARDING INVIRCI~fN~]'I'AL ~1CEtNS ARE AT TW HEARIlNG. ~ APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOK:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or d.isapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal. This DNS was mailed to: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. WA State Department of Health 3. Spokane County Health District 4. Spokane County Division of Engineering 5. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6. Spokane County Parks Department 7. Spokane County Boundary Review Board 8. Spokane Regional Transportation Council 9. WA State Department of Transportation 10. Spokane Transit Authority 11. Central Valley School District 12. Consolidated Irrigation District 13. Firc District No. 1 . E ~ l 4 ~ ~ ~ . (CE (CZ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 -1- ~l C . .J n . qrc . , SPOtCANE ENYIROMtENTAI ORDIM11t1CE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) , Envirorxoentat Checkllst F i le No. Purpose of Checklltt: 9 7 The State Envlroroental Policy Act (SEPA) thapter 43.21C RCW. requires a11 governeental agenctes [o conslder the environmental irapacts of a proposal before mking Aecisfons. An Enrironoental Inipact Statenent (E15) must he prepared for all proposals with proDaDie siqntficant adverse lmpacts on the qualiiy of the envlronsent. The purpose of thls checkllst 1s to provlde information to help you and the agency identlfy tmpacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts frow the proposai, 1f it can be done) and to help tht a9ency decide whether an E1S is required. lnstructions for Applicants: This envirormerital theckllst asks you to Cescrlbe sorae basic lnformatlon aDout your proposal. Gorernmental agencies use this checklist to dettrenine vhether the enrironaental lnqatts of your proposal are significant, requlrlrtg preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, wifh the nast pretise inforvutton knarn, or give the best description you can. You must ansrer each question •ccurately and carefully. to the best of your kn w ledge. ln ioost cases, you shoul0 be able to answer the questions fro■ your own observatlons or proSect plans wlthout the need to hire ezperts. If you reilly Go not know the ansrer, or if & question does not apply to your proposal. ,rrlte 'do not know' or 'does not &pply.' Complete answers to the pwstlons nar w y avold unnecessary deiays later. Some questions ask about governmenta) ngulattons, suth as zoning. shoreline. and landxaark desi9netlons. Ansver these questtons tf you tan. lf you have probtews, the governsentai agencies csn assist you. The checklist puestions apply to a11 parti ot your propossl, even if you plan to Eo theu over a perlod of tinie or on Ctfferent parcels of lanC. Attach any additional tnfonaAtion that will descriDe your proposal or 1ts enrlronnental effects. The •qency to rhlth you subsit this checklist may tsk you co ezplain your insrers or provide addltlonal informtton reasonably related to deternining tf there Rsy be signiflcant adverse 1moact. Use of chcckllst for nonproject proposals: Cornplete this checklist for nonproject propoials, even though questlons msy be ansrereE 'Ea s not aoo1y'• iN ADOITION, couplete the SUPYLE]1ENTAL SNEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part 0). For nonprojeCt aCtionS, the rtferenceS 1n tRe CheCkllst t0 the wordS 'Drojett.' 'aDP>>cant,' anE 'DroDerty or sltt' Should be read as 'proposal,' 'D*oPOSer,' and 'affected qcographlC area,' resDeCtlvely. A. BACXGRDUNO 1. 'Iaae of proposeG project, 1f apOlicable: i~ C i-+ rk.-~►IL lJic c 1.~.,~1~~L ~T..t.~ 4.~--.~---► r~ f~ r-~ I r. 1_' 1'-. : - ~ _ - ~ T~ ~ 2. Name of Applicant: •.-I 7-712.Cs= fr- ii~ ~*'~:.Li .~'~'TJL J.- i t.` 3. Addrezs and phone number of ippllcant or contaci person: rl 1 -7~~- 4 ~L~~ r t. Date checktist prepared: S. Agenty nquesting checklist: .~'ty ~'c 6. ProposeE tloing or schedule ISncludtng phasing, if applltablel: 7. a. Do you have any plans for future addittons, ezpanston. or further actlvlty related to or co m ected rlth this proposal? If yes, ezplain. ye- t- ~ 'KL ~L-ti C._•+K.:'iL-_~ : -U• e.I1( a_ tf ~:1')!-_ .'rl''v VJlJ b. Do you orn or hare optlons on land nesrby or aEjacent to thts proposal? 1f yes, explaln. ~W--; T + `r ' v .l4.1 L- i L- -7 ,L G P-- 1F- -7 8. list any enviromrntal lnforsatlon you know about that has Deen prepareG. or w111 be prepareE, dlrectly related to thii proposal. ~ C i~►L . Rev.2/1/88 1 I SPOT.AliL LFVIROtt[QNLL ORDIl1AACE (VAC 197-11-960) Sec[loa 11.10.230(1) ~ • A. 6AC1CG40QAD (contioued) ~ , . 9• Bo you Imov vhecher appllcaciona are peoding for aoveruseacal approvals of o[her proposals direeclr afteccina the property covered by your proposal? I( yes, e=plaia. \ C. 10. Li sc •07 governmo[ apyrovaL or periica [hac vi ll be needed for rour proposal. S f Imovn. ^ 3'~e -1 J, L ~ : ~ i 7~ ~=-C ~ ~ • ~ . ~ ~ ~ 7 , ` /y-' y . ~ ~ y • ~ /,I ,r• r ^ ^ ~ 1 7 4 L ti CcI~V~ 11. Give • brieE, comple[e descriptlon o[ rout proposal, including the proposed uses •nd the •i:e oL the projecc and site. "here •re ievecai questions Lter ln thim checklis[ thac ask rou co describe certain upect• of rour proposal. You do noc need co repaac those •NVlTs on chis PaB ° • i ~j -t-ff A i' f h C ~ -C..1 c - t= - " Z 6 G . 4 - T_f !S 1 -7 '4~ -A, fr_ r..; -T .a ~ r w -,F_ . r: .,.:-=v.~~ ~ • ~ 7 l fC •1 { ~rir~~~ C ~I..::C,L ~ ~►t..: -i , Lr..i_ T t t r.rfL, C.,~ Ic,'"lir <'-J-- c C,--..._-~ - 7 C'.'~ 1_. Lnca[lon of the proposal. Cive sufficLen[ infornatlon for • perwn [o undeCsund the preclse loution af your pcoposed pro}ec[, lncludine a screet address, it anv, •nd section, [ovnshlp •nd range, !t knovn. I[ a propo u 1 vou1C occur over a ringe o.` area, pcovtde the range oc Dounda[le• o[ the ei[e(e). Provldc • legal desctiption, site plan, vicinlty aap, •nd topoeraphic sAp, tt reasonably avatlaEle. Vhtle you should subalt any p L ns required by the •gencr, you •re not required to duplLcace saps or de[aSled p L ns submitted vt[h any perelt appllcatfon reLted to this checkllst. t= ~ ~T I 2 1 - a ' • ~ Li -t , e Z 5 h-' 'L 4 ~ . . , a: u--+- 4-- laL- c. L.: , -7 F+ ~ 13. Does the proposed acclon lie vithln the AQuiter Setilclve Area (ASA)? :he General Sever Sc M ce Area? 'he Prtority Sever Service Ares? 'he Clcy af Spokane? (See: Spokaae County's ASA OverLr Zone AtL• tor boundartes). , `i c1 y ~ ~ 1~. 47- v E F_- . v 'O EC COl7l.t'LD ET APPLICAN'[ 6. CIfVIROR`tL}I".Ji. II.NDfTS Evalua[ton For Agency Use Only 1. EAP.'TI A. Leneral description of the site (clrcle one): t L[, Colll ~ hilly, steep slopes, mauntatnous, other: b. 'lhat is the sceepesc slope on che •ite (approxisaCe percent slope)' d~ 1 • ~ ~1-t1~ ' ! [ t A.:. C. 'jhat general type■ of soils are found on the slte (for eueple, elay, uod, 6ravel, pea[, suc4)'' t-u L; "~j~;'~~(~({r~ c~:1~ If you lunov the classitlutloo ot a6rlculcura1 soLL, specity chea •nd ooEe any pclme faraLod. r} ~jf~_ t fi ~ . Z ~ t_2 v ~v,~ h ~ d. kre there surface lodicatioos or hiscorq of urucasle soll■ ln the Lsediate viciaic7' If go, J describe. ~ , ~~~ir'~~, 5; ~Gh•~ L ~ , c-Ai 1 ~ 2 ` . ' SPOKJIlfE EKYiR0M4Ef(TAL ORDIMIWCE (YAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) ~ S. ENYiR01MEKTAI. ELEMENTS(contlnued) Evaluation For Agenty Use Only e. Descrlbe the purpose. type, and approxinwte qwntlties of any f1111ng or grsding proposeE. ]ndicate source of filt. ij t :,C - P,- T T:4, j : : ••^G / f. Could erosion o x ur as + result of clearing. construction, or use? If so, generally descrlbe. ~ N /.A ~i^~ Y f1 I W: L, I- 1..I=_ ~L K- y~ ~7 i G• r.3 t,~ ~C t! ~~S.• V:' T`~ La.~ A,~:~ 5..~~' - g. Jlbout what percent of the site will De covereE rith iaipervtous surfaces after proSect construc- tion (for example, asphilt or build ngs)? G 7L l ~ h~ S Tr~'E. h. Propased measures to rcduce or control eroslon, or other iaqacts to the a rth, 1t any: 2, AIa a. 11hat type of emizsions to the atr woula result fram the proposal (1.e., dust, autanobile, odors ~ industrial, wood snioke) during constructton anE when the project 1s coapleteE? If any, generally describe and give •pproximate quantltes 1f known. _~`y`~~ : 4l'~ : -r . _ -r ►_y ' r ~;I , ~ b. Are there any off-stte sources of ewisstons or odor thtt nu yaffect your proposal? If so, generally destrlbe. ' c. Proposed measures to rtduce or control emlsslons or other tnpacts to tir, 1f any: 3. WATER \ A. Surface: (1) ls there any surface water pody on or in the inwediate ricinity of the site tncludinq year- round and seasonal streaes. saltw ter. lakes. Ponds. vetlandsl? It yes, describe type and provide names. lf approprlate. sttte vhat streaw or rtver tt flows into. ~ ~ ~y~ . y L ~ ts~ ~ t,' L ~ ' L c~T , (2) Mill the project requlre any vork over, in, or adjacent to (rlthin 200 feet) tAe descrtOM i raters? lf yes, please describe and attach avallable plans. 3 z ~ STO[A~ L11YI1t0l4~Ni"~i. OIDIMPC! ('JAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10.230(1) , b. LtNIRONldNTAI. CLIIQ1i:5 (coetinued) ' • ~ Evaluatioo For A6encr Use Only (3) Escioace the asount of till and dredge material tlat wuld pe placed la or resoved fro■ clx surface vater or vet L nds •ad fodlcate the area of the •ite that vauld De affected. Indicate the source of tlll wAEerial. (G) Vtll the proposal reQuire aurfaee wa ter vithdra w 1s or diverslon&' Giw •=eneral descrip- tton, purpose, and •ppcoxtaate auantitlea, i[ knarn. ` ~ 1 \ (5) Dxs the proposal Llc vitAin a 100-qcar tlood pLic! It •o, note loutlun on cl+e site pYao. N Y ~ (4) Does the propo"l involve •nr dlscharTes of vu tc macerials to surfaee vaters? It so, 1 deecrtbe the type o( wste and •ntlcipateE volure o[ dlscharde. 1 ` l. ' b. Ground: (1) yill aroundvater be vithdravn, or vill vater De discha[ged Co groucdva[er' Glve `eneral descrlption, purpose, •nd •pprozinace quanci[les, if Imovn. ~ DescriDe vu te sacerial that v111 be discharged Lnto the grouod (tom septic uaks or otF+er u oitary vastc trea oen[ tatillty. Describe the =enetal sLse o[ the ■rst m, the aumber ot house• to be served (Sf applicable) or the euaber ot pecsoos the srscen(s) ars expected to serve. 0 N~ - vy C A r!~i (l) Desctibe •ny •ys[ems, ocher tdan those desigoed for the Aisposal ot sanitary vaste, installed for the purpose of dlsehar:lna tluids belov the =[oued surfue (ineludes irsteus such •s chose for the disposal o( •torm vater or draloa`e trom floor draies). Describe the t7pe ot •yscea, the •mount of materlal to be disposed of throush the •ystes and tht typeo ot saterials llkelr to be disposad ot (lncludletg marerials vhich aay •n[er the systm laadryrtent17 thr w=h spills ot as a resulc of tiretightlna actlvities). (4) Vill anr cheaicals (especially organic •olvencs or pecrolew tuels) be •cored ie above- sround or uoderground scorage tanlu? If so, vluc types sod qWatlcies oE materlsl• vill be stored? N ✓ - 4 Z E•.?o•~s . STOf.AHL EMAORldtt'fiLI. OtDIHANCL (WAC 197-11-960) Seccioa 11.10.230(1) .D. LKVIAONKlRAL III?ENZ'S (coaciaued) ~ t • • Evalwtloa For Aaeoc7 Use Only (S) What protectlve oeasures vill De talcan to lnivre [hat laaki oi spill• of any cheaicals scored or uaed on sice vill not be •lloved to percolate [o sroundvater (this includes neasures co keep chesicals w t of disposal systems deseribed in 3b(2) aod 3b(3)'. c. uater Runoff (Lncluding ■corm vacer): I , (1) Describe t!►e source of ruaoff (includiog stocs vater) and k clod of colleetioa and disposal it any (laclude Quancities. if knovn). Vhare vill thi• water flov' Vill this water Llov inco ocher waters? It no, descrlbc. , ~'~t } G~. r,..~ - At ~ 1 1`~ L. A~~ !C: ' i' F l~ lZ.~► i f~ -lr11e. ~ F--C t'L4 n ::.:1~_ ~ ~~2r.•i-•aT~t'~ 11"T~ TF,- #.1'ii.=C. %c'c t •i C'~t-• l'(~ . ~ C iL t ~1 ~ L- r [C= P:'Tt,l~S tC ~~~~,T _ (2) :1111 any cheaical• be storcd, handled or uaad on tfie site in a lou tioa vhere a spill or leak vill drain co surfaee or 6roundvacec or to as[ors water dispoaai syst s dischargin= to . ` surface or grounAvater' L' I (J) Could wste ssterials en[eT grwnd or surtace wa[ers' I[ •o, generally descrlbe. iT t~i~ti T Q 'T'H' ~i .+C - C d. Proposed meu ures to reduce or control surface, around, •nC rvno(f w cer lipac u, tf •ny (if ~i t [he proposed ac[lon lle• vichln che Aquifer Seasltive Aru De especially clu r oa •rplaoatlons r relating co lacilities coneerninj Sectioa• 3b(4). 3b(5). and 3c(2) o[ thls chocklint): ~ T~ l i ' ~"r• . u N ►J f'~ F~ _ ~ ~ ~ c. ~ ~ r~ es"r ~ +.3 +G.. vJ f'L v wi G~ 16- C5,t~.M -"'LI j-7 C:. A, N C. f"L , a. Puvrs a. Check or circle trpe ot vegetation (ound on c1u site: ✓ deciduou• tree: alder, aaple, aopen, ocher. ~ evergreen tree: fir, eedar, plne, other. v ~hcv6s. ✓ grue. pasture. crop or <<ain. J-11, vet @oil pLacs. cattail, buctercup, bullrush, akumk eab6ase, ocl+er. 1/11' water plants: water 1llly, eel6rass, alltoil, other. ocher types o[ ve;etacion. b. Vhac kiod and uount of vegeutloa vill be rsowd oc •lcsredt k" b.~S- 111t Ih*-n r (7 ~ratj lp. FM ej"d iA ra- ~3.1-► `;P't ►z(: Cs~[ ~ ~ (-L C,A E * n c. l.isc [hraatened or endanaered specieo lmorn to be on or near chs •i[e. % Ki !`~0- d. Proposcd landscaping, use of oatine p Lnts. or otbsr meuun • co pn ser*e ot eahaace vegetatioc on the site, !t any: ~~~t,-[►w: L, 'e'wL" re ..-l, t'- I /~r , i , - NQ (MM r-o ;o.Te- 97 La..,;ti r-[ , s `~5 Z F•.ft r ' SPOKANE EMYIRONMENTI►L ORDIFIANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIROHMENTAI. ELEMEKTS (continued) Evaluation For 5. AHIMALS Agenty Use Only a. Circie any birds and aninwls whith have been observeC on or neer the slte or are kn a+n to De on or nedr th! Stte: r ~ i Dirds: hawk. heron. eagle. Q!ngblyds;,c-•-- inemmals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, othe fish: bass, sainion. trout, herring, s, other: \ b. list any threatened or endangered speties known to De on or neer the s1te. r c. ls the site part of a migration route? If so, explaln. n e ~ ~ : ~ ~ t3l~ r•► K--~, ~i- i v~t c c= .`r~ ~ ► T ~ : , ~ , . a. Vhac kinds of energy (clectric, natural gas, wooQ stove, soiar) wiTl be useG to neet the the completed project's energy needs? Describe rhether tt rfll be useC for hea[ing, rnanufac- turing, etc. ~ ' •t ~ ..;G. r~~~~.+1, 14 r . . r t ~ • r . , r r y h. uould your prciet; affec, thr poter.tlai use of so)ar energy by adjacer, properties? 1f sc, cenerally describe. C. 'amat kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? c[her proposed measures Co reduce or Controt energy inpacts, if any: _ • (V ~ r- . C ' : . . . _ 1 ►J~J ~-a 1. ENYIRONMENTAL HEALTF! a. Are there •ny envtrorx*ental health hazards, Intluding exposure to toxlc che+vlcals, r1Sk c* ffre and explosion, s0i11, or nazardous weste, that coutG occur as e result of tM s proposai' If so, descrfbe. Destribe special eeeryenty servtCes that mtght be rcquired. srouun nrvitoRKEx= otnixuacL (WAC 197-11-960) Sec[lon 11.10.230(1) ~ 3.• G+fYIROMQR'L►L Lt.ElQKL5 (contlaued) , • ' Lvaluatioa For Ageacr u.e only L17VIR0lIfQiT:AL EzAL-H (coatlowd) (2) Proposed measures to reduee or coatrol aaviroamencal healch hasards. if any: b. Noise: (1) Nhac cypes of ooise e:lst in the arn vhich aar affeet rour project (Eor esamplc: cralfic, equipmnt, opecatlon, other' (2) What types aad levels ot ooise vould be creaced br or a uociated vith the pro}eec on a . shoct-cerm or a long-ters basi• (tor e:aaple: trafile, construction. operacion. other)2 Indicate v!►at hours noiss would eomc Irvm the site. ' T 4( ~ S t S ~c t t•, ~1•:-f,~- s~ u ~ Y ~ ~ - ~ ; Proposed oeasure to ceduce or control noise ispacts, 1[ •ny: ~ j ~ ~ ~ 8. L1'tD AND SHORELl`1E USE ~ A. Vhet 1s the curtent we o[ the slte and adjacent proper[les'J~Vrz~11-~.~: rp sL:77 Wt jk . ? T(. D. Ilas the site Deen uscd tor •griculcure' It •o, dsscribe. )11G c. Describe eny s[cuctures on the site. -,jitr iCj-~~_'t'3 ~7 1^;4r~•iir-~•~ Z `~"CC.`-I_ ~ .~S~~iE.> L-,v.~... C-►,: r•-y u -f i.~ &_-1 'vr ! 1 . ~i 1 t t. 1.~ - t C\] ~ L~ ~ ~ 1 ` ~ ` ti ~ / r'I ~ A l V i ' i~~ i ti - ~ Y M `t M _I ~ ~ iL ~ ~ L~ I~ _ ~ S.;l(~il\~^i~i~~\ • T d. Vtll any -ructura• be desollshed? If so, vRlchl 'V U e. H!tat !s the current sonistg classiticacion of the sitet Vhat 1s the curreat cmpreheaslve pLn desitnation of the sits? g. If ■ppllcaDle, vtut is the curten[ shorellne aanter progro desigssatioo of the site' ~~I`"a► • r h. Has •ay pact of the sice Decn classllisd as an "eaviroamenta117 Kmitivs' •reai II •o, .Pecicr. • L. ApproxlmLatelp bw many people vould raside ot vort in che complated project? r,► ~ 7 z E-~o -95 storAn ERVIROMHZWr&t. oantKAxcz (WAC 197-11-960) Secciao 11.10.210(I) S. LHVIROl7fQ1R'11. II.DM1fZ'S (couclnved) ~ • . ~ °valuation Fot A49enCy u.e only Approxloa[e17 hov aan7 people vould the cosple[ed projact dlsp Lce? k. Proposed seasures to •void or reduee disp L e sent iapacts, 1[ •ny: ~ ; 1. Proposed seasures to enwre the proposal is compa[lble vlth ezlotini aod pro]ectep Lnd usu aad ~ plans, if any: & &J4 P~Dt'.Z ~TN`. C-r',•r~1~lVL~~~ ('T ~ `i ; C~ ~ L~ r - ~ , 5~lc _ t sL~ L ~ : ~ t. . ~ . ; • : . ~ R ~ ~e W-LT4 l..cE ISisS F:k- ( 16~•-1. ~ ~ ~ . !•h J TL:~.'tj ~ •i'-~,~'~ i. , f~►'r ~7 ►~SSc ~ t•:i ~ . 9. HOllSINC a. Approxisately Ao+r aan7 units vould M provided, if anpl Iodieate vhe[har hith-, aiddle-, or lov-lncom houslcg. r U.: L. •~v - ~ji f' t~ : 7L . ' L L : ' S"T1 ~.%C . i7~.: ~..C~ I b. Approxlascelr hov aan7r ualts, 1f any, vould De aIlaioated' Iodiute vhathet hi=h-, sLiddle-, or lowincoae hausln=. t c. Proposed •easures [o reduce or control houaina impacts, if aay: . t~ u -T -7 . 10. AESTIiETICS Whac 1n [he callesc hel6ht of anr proposed struccure(e), ooc includint •ncemas? Wtuc ts che ptincipal e:terior buildind asterial(s) proposed' < • . ~k.L ~ [ ~ wi s-_r 1~~ E. 6. , ( L•1 H~l, ti T : t~ t= ~ i,t • i ~1 , , r . b. uhat vtevs in thc lmmediace viclnSty vould be •Ite[ed or obsCruetedT Y~_ y. t c. Proposed measures co reduce or con[roi ws[hetic lapaets, 1( acy: 11. LICHT AND L1AAL A. 'Ruc trpe o[ 11=ht or tLre vill ttu pcopoaal producet :fiar cise o[ da7 vould i[ aalol7 occur' tb zJ.~:. . ~r b. Could liah[ or gLre frou tfis t1a1eMd project be • aatet7 hasard or tntec[ere vi[h •LrsT ~ C. Nhat nxtsting otf-site •wrces o[ 11;hc or = Lro aa7 •Ifect your proposal? d. Tropoaed neasnre• to reduce or eonttol lighc and fLre ispaccs, if aal: l`: t•. F- ~ ~ ~ ~ •~'l Q ~ . . .4. ' . ~ i' , 1 ( ~ : / , ~ e Z~•~o-95 M 5`vAL MMROKMENTAL DiW'lXffalCE (t7AC 197'-11-9b0) Setttoc 11.10.230(1) ~ . -lt. LRYIRflfQSLXiAI. ELZMEYrS (con[laued) Ewaluacicn Fpr • r Agenc' Usr L1nLr 12. P.ECREAFIOH uhat deslgnaCed aad taforsal recrw [ional epporcunitie• are Ln c4►e imediate vltirtitx? f*J tA m b. Wauld the propQsed prrrject d1Rplate aay ezls[ing recraa[locah uaes? Yf so, dercribe. c. Propowed aeavures ta reducc or concrol iapacta on retraatTop, ietluding seereati4nr1 copportuoi- tie■ to bt proMided by the pza}ec[ nr applluaC, lf ■ar: R bs- - 1 13. HIS:`ORIC AHD CfILTi1AAL P'RLSGRVA'IQK a. Are shert any place■ or abject■ 1lszed oer or progaied for sutioaal, :cace nr lacal Qrererva- Clon reglstert fuwvn to be oa or next Eo [I'►ie aiteY It ao, gaasrally dercribe, ~ b. Generslly describe an7 landnarka or eviden.ce of histoFic archaeolobicai, seientific or culcural lepartance lnotim to be an aar nexs ta che vi[e. c~ Praposed weasurea ta reducr or control ispaccs, if anT: 14. :^FJMtSPaR:'ATTOH A. Idrnsify publlc s[ree[@ •nd higtrwsyr ■erving the ■1te and describe proposbd acceae ea the ezisting streee s7s[ea. Shoron site pLna, if any. ~ •i C_ t4 J #e-. -'f i e' f4 v/. l 5. Li ■ite eursen[ly aerved hy puF~lic tranalt' If sat, vhak ia c~►e apQraxiaa[e d1.stance [a the -~11 7 aearso[ tranait atogT ~.s f`, ~ ~ i f3 i2 ►i i ~ ~ ~7s ~ ~ y t/+~ i" ~ ~ i-3 ~7 . ~ C~„~-~ r~ ' ~ l ~/~LL s`'L,~l~ L' ( 7~„r' ~ r P- ~~fl !3 L; fi tI+ c. Aov t,anr p+rk.taa spaces voul.d the ca+rylered preje~~~ et have? Bov saaT vculd the pra}ect e3lKdnate' 'T N"C. re. '.'r f+' G ~"-~+~L .c ~t'• _ ~ i . -v i =-a ~ d. Vill the prapasal reqcein any neV rosd@ or ■tr+ata, or Lwprowra[■ to existiag road■ or $trest• na[ Lacludln; drivewyat I( to, grnerali7 describe (icdleate +rhuttrer quhlie or prlvase). C. W111 the project use (nr otcur in the isamrdiate ricinit7r af) ra[er, rail, or air CraasportRtlun? If •o, genrrally dtserlbe. t-1 L 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 10 , y • ~ $~~ME MMtOIDCM"AL DRDTWC'. (VAC 197-I1-960) Saction 11.10.230(1) D., IIIVIRO!!CEI'.AL Q.EMZNPS (conciowd) Lvaluacion For 1►aency Ose Only f. Rov unr vehicular crip• pec dar vould pe aeneratcd by the cosplecsd projeet' If lmova, indicate vhioo paak would oeeur. ~ kl 4"7 It:~ USrs- e:-= .-r l; 4. ~I\ J ,~~~~•T~JL-~ ~ 1 g. Proposad masures to reduce or concrol transportatioa lmpacts, if aay: ~ ~ ~ ~ 15. PUbLIC SERVICLS A. 5lould the project result in an locrused owd (oT public •anicam (for euaple, flre procsctioo, police proceccion, health cari, schools, ochcr)? I[ so, =enera117 describa. ~ 1 'Ti i'-F~ r►,+ i D. Proposed aeasures co reduce or control direc[ Sapacca on puDllc •orvices, 1` an7: ~ 16. I.:ILI'IES ` ~ - a. -ucili currentl ble at the mice: (1accrltlti. na`ural ` f•ter rafuse1 ' servipE telephoae, ran ary sever~ @ep[ic sysces, oc6ir. b. Describe the utilltie• that •ce pcopomed for the projec[, [M utlllt7 provShcag the ae nice sod ~ the veneral constrvctioa actlvitles oo the s!t• or lo the lasadlnte K clnltr vhlch d ght be needed. t7 /C 1 I N-2 14 ~ ~ C. S I CNATU1tL I, the undersi6ned, ovesr under the penalt7 0[ perjun that the abova r*spoosas are ~de [ruthtu117 and to the Desc ot ay kawledge. I almo unGers[aod that, stiould chere be •ur vllliul dsrepreseotailon or v111fu1 Let of tull disclosure oo ey patt, the a•n aay vithdrav aay decerai N Clon ot nonsigniflcaace chat 1[ alght Lssue in reliance upon thl• elrcbLlisc. Da[e : ~ - ~ •~~,~.Z Tropooeoc - La/. ~ • ~ S~~>LTC ~G~ (Tl..e nt or T ps) Proponent: AddreM: ~Z- ! Qi ~ ~ &as- - (SigcvEure) lhone : L141 +1vfL a ~ A. 0- 1k+iAL. S Permon cospletina [orm: lJ aJ%7 di u iSt"1 L& Date: Phone : J"' FOR STAJT OSL ONLT / r Su[[ msEer(s) revieviaa checVclist: ~1 / ~ based on his scatf reviev of the enviros+aeo al cheeklint atbd other rcioont infonatioa, Ehs scalf: A. Coccludas that there are no proDable signifi unt adverse ispact@ wod recouns+ods a deteraiaation of uoosignificance. 6. Coocludes that probable sisniticant sd w rse envitoamacal lapaeto do ezisc fot the currant propoaal aod ncosimeode a Ri[igated deter- aioation of noosigniticance vith cooditiona. C. Coaclude• that [here are ptoDable signifiunc adverse tnviromental impaets aod rscaieod• a decsrmioatioa of •igniiluoee. TILIfIG TQ - =75.00 lo 7C_0) n .G19 - • ? SPOKANE COUN'TY PLANNING ZONE RECLA.SSIFICA.TgON APPLICATION ]PAR'T I A. C .NEItAL. INFORIVIA'I'IQN: Spokane Ualley Good Samaritan Village NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE J im Droppers, Adm i n i strator MAILING ADDRESS E. 17121 - 8th Avee CITY Greenacres , STATE WA ZIp 99016 PHOIVE 924-6161 (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNEIt, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AiJTHORIZATION FOR APPLICANT TO T~eVEvangel ~ aj ELu~ieranV~ood LEGALOwNEx'SNAME Samaritan Society PHONE (605) 362-3198 MAILING ADDRESS x 5038 CrrY Sioux Falls sTATE SD Zlp 57117-5038 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 31.31 dCl^2S ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) 167.05 SS 1 9~ 0 5!u~ 5y j`13 9 v4-l> ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 5s i92 ~ 023, 55 v9 2-io i3 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED 5 05 19 Z h 5+ 11 -i o Z d.. s-j- S 24- I t I-ci STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL E. 17121 - 8th Ave. EXISTIING ZONE CLASSIFICATTON(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3. 5 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Nurs i nq Home/Reti rement Apartments PROPOSED ZONING U R 12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCHOOL DiSTxICT Centra 1 Va 11 ey FIRE DISTRICT # 1 WATER PUR VEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Single family dwellmgs Duplexes (X) Multifamily dwellings (X) Manufacdued homes( ) Business Industnal Mixed Use Ocher(X~-Descnbe Nursinq Home (All current uses - no chanqe) LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY None ' B. LEGAL/ZONF RECLASSIFYC'.,ATM IIl1F'nRMATin~ P Pr rLr ,c , M4 -7 & L_ y ?,L a..rtr~ S~7 r- AvT.' L-r.~l,~ A. r- LOCATION OF PROPOSAL a sJ 2~ r.! T-r ~ a~ v ; w~~-•--r .7 -'I",.-~ ~ F y l SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 45 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Tschirley, 8th WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD 19461.681 , , ZONE RECLASSIFICAT A.PFLICATTON Page 2 of 4 t - . . , DOES THE PRQPQSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLAPINED ARTERIAL YES {X }NO NAME(S) OF ARTERiAL ROADS nearest i s AoDIewav _ LEGAL DESCRLPTI4I'd OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPQSED 27, ~ ~1~,~, d }`LjQf-! S pi _ ~1 ! N _aCL 1'T" /_335; 57 ~e~- EXISTING ZC?NE{S} U R 3.5 TO PR.QPOSED ZQNE(S) _ U R 12 - FOR THE FOLLI'}WING DESCRIBED PROPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR QR PR4VIDE BELOw That portion of Government Lot 2, Section 19, T25N, R45E, W.M. lying South of the Plat of Apply Valley Estates 2nd Addition and that ~ portivn deeded to James and Lenore Wirth Dated Novemeber 5, 1986, together with the North 609e99 feet af the SW 1/4 of Section 19, T25N, R45E, W.M. EXCEPT the East 9335a57 feet thereof. IF YQU DO N4T H(JLD TITL,E TQ THE PRCJPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? Hold Title WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITTONS OF THE AREA WHICH Y4U FEEL MAKE THIS PROFOSAL WARR,ANTED? We want to rezQpe this parcel so that our use of the property wxll no lonver be a non-conformin4 use. As a non-conformin4 use, we cannot even build a carport for our vans4 We are providinq_the same services here that we ahve for 30 years. We would Iike approprtate zoning. WHAT IMPACT WILL TkE PROPQSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PRnFERTLES? None WHAT FACTORS SUPPtJRT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATIQN? _The current use has been ] n ex 1 stenr_e for nv-Er 3 • p -the area.: and we should be able to,r~perate wit 1 the harras,sfflent Qf_a non-conformin4 use designatlnn. WHAT MEASURES DQ YQU PROP4SE TC7 IvIITTGATE YOUR PRQFQSAL'S IMPACT' 4N SLJRRrJUNDING LAND USEg Since there is no use chanqe being proposed for th2s parcel, there should be no percelved impact on surrounding land useo i , ZONE RECLASSIFICATT+ ~.PPLICATTON Page 3 of 4 F a r I i ART 11 THIS SECTTON OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PRUVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFTCATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTAT'ION VYITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS QF THE PRELIMINARY C4NSULTAT'IQN SHALL BE INC(7RPORATED IN THE PRQPQSAL BEFQRE FINAL SUBMITTAL TQ THE PLANNTNG DEPA,RTMENT FIRE MARSHALLlFIRE DISTItICT A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PR4TECTIQ I ICT NQ I B ADEQUATE ARRANGEIv1ENTS (HAVE) 1'VO BEEN MADE TO MEET UUR NEEDS IN PROVIDTNG FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER S M AND FACILITTES FOR FTRE PROTECTIQN PURPOSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW T~ , OR LTNABLE TO CALCULATE NOVV BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFIIVITIVE, .AND WII..L BE DETERMIINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIDN TiME D REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE FIRE DISTRICT SIGNATURE/T'ITLE DATE VYA'g'ER PURVEYQR r A SATISFACTQRY ARR NTS F4R DUMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS AVW (HAVE NQT) BEEN MADE B REQUIREMENTS/C4MMENTS A - 4--Ws0/..~4/6 WATER DISTRICT S G A ,rT E DATE COUNTY EPdGINEER ~s t-- - ~ Zoa A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIQN HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT A C4MMENTS cd ~ SIGNATUREfI'ITLE DATE COUNTY UTILYTIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSI4N HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBIviITTAL OF THIS FRQPQSAL (HAVE) (giAVF ~OT) ~EN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS STTE IS Gd~-5~~~, r~ -e A COMMENTS ~ar r1. ~ ra. 1711~r"lk/r ,fQ ~y 7 Y .5•Lt. o ~f C 141 A`-5 SIGNA'I'UREjTITLE DATE _ ~ HEALTH DISTRICT ~f ~ G ~•~rr ~ ~.,.1 ~ A PRELTMTNARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PL5AN RAL REQUIRE MENTS FQR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPUSAL (HAVE) N4T EEI~I SATTSFIEl? /A cohrtvrErvTS r~ 1~' ~ - 4 L I -e ~ eE/ J`'IC`]~[A`~ _ D r- , SEWER PURVEXOR ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FQR THE PROVISI4A,i OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTQQD BY TTI-iE APPLICANT A COMMENTS ~ /J jr , SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ZUNE RECLASSIFICATI( ►PPLrCATION Page 4 of 4 e r a PAR'T xIY SURVEYOR VERIFICATTON I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEY4R, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATTON REQUESTED F4R THE ZONTNG MAP AND WRI"ITEN LEGAL DESCRTFTION SIGNED pATE ~ ADDRESS PHONE . ~~t . ZIP PART Z''V (SIGNAT'iJRE 4F FROPERTY 4WNERS OR LETTER 4F AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR AF'FIRM UNI7ER FENALTY C►F,PERJC3RY THAT T'HE ABQVE RESPONSES AR.E MAUE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNaWLEDGE I FURTHLR SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF REC4R.D OF THE AREA PR4FUSED F4R THE FREVI4USLY IDENTIFIED LAND U5E ACTI4N, 4R, IF I'10T THE QWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMTSSION FROM THE OWNER AUTH4RIZING MY ACTI4NS ON HIS/HER BEHALF NAME Jim Droppers, Administrator nATE 3-28-1995 ADDRESS E. 17 121 - 8th Ave PHONE 924-6 161 Greenacres, wA ZIP 99016 C --'l/'+~----' -2 qGI~ATURE OF APPLIbkNT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE STATE OF'WASHINGTON ) } ss C4UNTY OF SPOK:ArIE ) SIGNED AND SWORT3 OR AFFIRMED BEFORE ME UN THIS DAY OF 1994, B"Y a II ~ ~.y ~ NUTARY SEAL of Washmgton State Not.azy Public in and 77, Reszding at 1- - , . _ My appomtrnent expires PART V (TO BE COMPLE'rED BY THE PLA,TVNIIVG DEPARTMENT) _ DATE SUBMITTED F1LE # ~ - 915 DATE ACCEP'TED (p Iqt BY ti b v d~ TQTAL FEES 96 bg 06 RECEIPT # r ~ -7 u . . SPOKANE CC)UNT'i' D►TVISION OF FLANNING AkPI.ItS BEF'ORE THE 'zONINC, A►D1I15112H ak~n~e Ua 11 ey~od ~~ma~tan U i 11 age Name af..pplicant• m aDers, lni ra r Agent Y` N _ Street Address: E. 17121 - 8th Avenue ~p ~ty. Greenacres S~~ WA ~ode 99016 Phone - Home. Work 9z4=~ The Evangel ieal Lutheran Good Agent's 1Vo.. IVame of P"roperry Qwner(s) Samaritan Society 5treet Address• E. 17121 - 8th Avenue Qty. Greenacres State: wp Zy.p Code 99016 Phone - Home W'ork: 924-6161REQUESTED ACT'IUN(S) (Cucle appropnate action) ~ Vanance(s) Cvnciitional Use Pernut Expansion of a ~ OtherT Nonc4nformmg Use FOR STAFF USE ON]LY ~ V~ola~on/ Sectior} Township 5 Rang, z-1.e-~ EnforcemenL Y ~fN aFue Dis1nct. OCWWP sewer purveyor aCWSP water purveyor pCUP star►dards meL Y N(NA *ExisUng zone °Cite applicable section. 3 c,4- aComp Plan de,signahon, U'RRA ~'~nal goad Plan designa~on ~ °Cntxcal ~l►reas Wetlands N~ %~Habitat , Geologic Aquifer and/or Flooda.ng -Lot, legai & add'1 ownerstup checked by -Person doing preapp conf -Other/previou.s Diviston of Planmng acUons mvolvuig dus property , SEPA complete apphcation date,_~;2~ °Ceruficate of Exemption No Applicaaon No -Hearuig Date -Vanance site plan dlmenstons checked byr A~OUa THE'PRoPERTY (by ap~ikant) AExisting use ofprogerty• Nurs i ng Home / Ret i rement Apartment aDescnbe ~~roposed use of the property, na~ng_chanee from'ex2sdng use' No C~iange °If a vanance apphcation, state the Cade standard and dpscribe the vananqp sougl~t 2n cor~parable lerm5 (x.e., 50 feet from centerline verses required 65 feet) Standard 14.620.365, Paraqranh #2. Recuest to allow the existYnq 501 rock cliff at east end ofi nn., rh proDer.v linP to serve as site - obscurinq devlce, withaut additionai _fPncp ar 1 dscanina. _ eIf a conclitional use pernnlt applicauon, daes proposal meet all standards? Y N If not, has one or more vanances been requested? Y N °If HONTE MUSTRY, has consultativn occurred v-nth Division of Buildirigs regarding constructxon of buil.dulg for intended use? Y N oWhat is the size of the subject property 31.3 Acres ~Street address of property (i.f known): E. 17121 - 8th Ave, Greenacres, WH yyU'i b QLegal descnption of property (includc easement, if a phcable). That ortion ot uovernmenz Lot 2, Sect~~ 191 T,25N. . R45Ee ,G~.M. _ lvl rx~ South of the Pla~ of ~ple ~aFle~r, ~tes ~'tl~n aRa'~Tiat portion ~r OiEgs and Lenore Wirt.hh dated November 5, 1986,taget,her wi5-The Wff e o le SW 1i4 of ° ai c R~'cp Section ti9,Ta"~ . . . e ast .3 ft thereof. oSvurce of legal; Tav 1 o En4 z neeri nQ Survev ~ u ~/r ° To t a l amount o f a djouiing land controlled by this vwner, sponsor and/or agent; lb i Ac re s ~-What intemst do you (apphcant) hold m the praperty? _ Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village Administrator STA'IE OF WASH[WG'ICUV' ) SS CiOUNPF1' UF SPOKANE ) I SWF.AR, UNDER PF1V'ALTY OF PERNRY, THAT (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR AITI"HORIZF..D AGENT PUR THE PROPOSED SII`E. (2) IP NC7I' TEE OWNER,, WRTI'TEi+i PF.RNiISSIOTI FROM OWNER AUTHOREZ[NG MY ACIIONS ON HISA-MR BEHAi.F IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF THE ABUVE RFSFoNSES AND THOSE ON SUPFORTING DUCUNFNTS ARE MA.DE TRLTIfIFLUYAAIDTO THE BESI' QF MY KNO E Date 7 ' Notary Pubhc u~ and for the sta.te of Washuigton, residuig at / `'1 MY aPPQlntment expues HDJZA APP (F" 4195) page 1 of Z %e 6 ~ d ~ > e ~ A. BURDElY OF PItOOF focm(s) (by •applicant) It is aecessaay for the applicant or his/her representative to establish the reasons why the REQUESTED AC°I'ION should be approved and to literally put forth the basic argument in .fqwor - of apgroving the application. Accord.ingly, you should have been given a foim for yourxeques~l - action (eariance, conditional use, etc.) designed to help you present your case in a way.whicil- addresses the criteria which the Zoning Adjustor must consider. Please fill the form out and return it with your application. B. 3IGN-OFF BY COUIi1TY DEPARTMEN'I'S AND OTHER AGENCIE3 (aPpflacant maasg vnset easln agency evhose ano. is cia°cled below) le SPOKANE ~OUNTY HEALTH DYSTRICT a) Proposed method of water supply: b) Proposed method of sewage disposal: A consultation has been held to discuss the pmposal. Z'he applicant has been informed of req ' ents and standards. We request consultadon with Division of Planning Y N ignature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived by Planning) 2o SP~~1VE O~Jl~t'I'Y DI~IOIl1 OF' B~JII.D~IGS FOR H011~IE I1~TDLT Y ONLY: A preliminary consultadon has been held to discuss the proposal. The appli has been informed of requirements and standards for the building, based upon the proposed use. (Signature) (Date) (Siga-off BVaived by Planning) 3e SPOKANE COUIVTY IDI I01~1 OF ENGYNEE~1G & 1tO~S A preliminary consultation has been ld to discuss thc proposal. The applicant has been informed of requirements and standards. VVc req est consultation with Division of Planning. X 1V (Signatune) ate) (Sign-off VVaived) 4. SPOK►ANE COUNTY DIVISIO1V OF U ~~S (Division of Planning may waive if outside VA1111IA) A pre 'l~aninary consultation has been held to discuss proposal. Z'he applicant has been informed of requiremeats and standards. (S1gn1LLlI~) (Date) ~S1gII-Off W11Ved by P13IIIIlIlg) The applicant is required to di,scuss the proposal with . to become inform of water system reqnirements and standards. (See #a below) The applicant is required to discuss the proposal with to become informed of s age disposal requirements and standards. (See #b below) ao WATER PURVEYORe ~e proposal is/isnotlocated within the boundary of our future serv~ e area. ) e proposal is/~s not located witlun the bouadary of our curnent distn 3) We able to serve this site with adequate water. 4) SatisfacLmy anwangements bave/have not been made to serve this propo (Sipatune) (Date) b o SEWERAGE PURVEYORo A preluni' ' nary consultanon has been held to discuss the proposal. The apphcant has n informed of requirements and standards. (Signature) (Date) ~ ~ ~ FID/Ia aPp OS1►. 4/95) PaBe 2 of 2 L Ll f dJ/~ ~ y a& AM_ D l i VARIAN+CE BIJRDEN OF PROOF FORM Name Spokane Ua1ley GQOd Samaritan Village File Number L A"vanance" Ls the means by which an adjustment Ls made m the application of the sgecifiic regulations of the zoning elassificaaon for a parncuiar (the subject) piece of property. Ttus pmp+erty, because of special cucumstances applicable to it, is depnved of pnvzl.eges commonly enjoyeri by ather properaes in the vicinity and in a simLiar zone classification This adjus#ment remedies the di.fference in pnvileges A vanance shall not authonze a use otherwise prolubited in the zvne classification u,, which the progerty is located The followuag quesaons unll help to deternune the outcome of your request Your request requvres accurate and complece resgonses Fust circle either the "yes" or the "no" answer(s) following the quesaons below as they apply to your situaaan and then explai.n as needed (ul the space provided) to make your unique situativn clear Certain phrases from the Zorung Code of Spokane County secaon on variances are u2cluded m these questivns and are underluied for converuence A. WilI dus vanance perrnlt a use which is otherwise protubited in thls zone9 Yes (No } Explauz: _ B Are there spec1al clrcumstances (lot size, shape, topography, location, access, surroundings, etc.) which apply to the subje+ct property and which may not , apply to other progemes in the v~.c~? 's No Explam: The prope rty 1 i ne between the -.pr=Sed- UR-12 and ex ist i ng U R--3 . 5 z s a 50' cliff which screens the UR-12 from the UR-3.5 C ` Is the subject property degnvgd!Qf 1213vrlcges c2mmc►nl,yrQl!2yed b oti ther pmMides in the -winity. and un a§imilgr wne classfficaaon? e s`' No Z-", Explam• The pr0pert-)( 11 nQ iS a rnc-k r1 iff Mai nta i ni nn a fence O1" landscapt0g_ v -along thrs would be extremely difficult, without providing mare screening than thf cliff daes naturally. D Wffl thLS vanance be harn3ful to the pubhc welfare or to other propernes rn the and a~irmlar zane classificahon? Yes (N01 Explain: ~ E Are there Qther smnilar situations in the Uciruly m a§urulgrr zone classification? Yes No Are they pemutted uses7 Yes Na Are they "noncQnfaUning" uMV Yes Na Explaui: _ F Cou1d the subject property be put to a reasonable and gernutted use by you or ang.ier persan without the requested vanance9 ~Fes ~ No , Explaln It ls currently being used, and the use would not be affected by thzs variance. G. If this request is grarited, will the subject property be more environmentally , sensidve, energy conserving, or will it promote the use of an Iustonc property? Yes No Explatn: It will leave the existinp scenic cliff uncluttered bv a man-made fence or artificiall„y Introduced landscapinq. _ Page 1 of 2 Z 0 ~ 91 dc "4 1 , . H. If thi,s vanance is granted, wiU the broader pubhc need or znterest be served? (Y'es No ExpL,dn;The natural scenery will be maintarned_without subjecting adjacent propertzes to unsiqhtly viewse I BVill this variance be inconsistent with the purpose of the zoning which applies to the subject groperty? Yes ~To Explain; Screeninq_between UR-12 and UR-3e5 will be maintainede J. Wili approval of thns vananGe ,grant to the subject pmgerty the pnvileges of a different e classification (in other words would this be a"de facto" zone change)? Yes No gxplain: - K. Will this variance be uiconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Conaprehensive Plan? Yes to) Explg,dn; Screening between the new UR-92 zone and the UR-3e5 zone will , still be provided, just with natural topography. L. Is this vari.ance required for a reasonable economic return from the sub9ect property or is the exisnng structure too small? Y'es No Explain:, - - - 1Vi Did the n~aGtical chfficultv which caused you to apply for this variance e~cist ~ ~ be,fore you owned the subject property? Yes No txplam: fhe cliff & underlying rock is natural to the areao N. If approved, would tlus vanance affect land use density regulations which e3cist tv pmtect the taffidmm/Spokane Aqwfer? Yes No Explain: The follownng space is for fiarther explana.tion. Attach an ad,ditconal page(s) if needeci. The east half of the north property line adjoins a UR-3.5 zoneo This normally requires a fence or landscaping buffer to our proposed UR-12 zonee In this locativn, however, the property line is a 50" basalt cliff, with our property at the topo Thrs effectYVely sereens our property firom the UR-3.5 zone belowe A 6" barrier on top would not add any screening and would detract from the natural beauty of the cliffe Further, the rock makes building fences & walls difficult and makes i~t very hard to keep landscapzng alivee Yvu are invited to present additionat photogrdphs, dzagrams, anaps, charts, etc. in support af this application. We have the equipment to display vicieo tapes. No such additional material is required and in any case it must be BREEF and descriptive of issues vc+hich need to be considened in reladon to this r+equested variance. If you have questions about the pr+acedure to be fvllowed feel free tD contact the Spokaue County Division af Planning at 456-2205. EOa.va,xUvcB , scrPXErr oF gxcOr FoM Pge 2 of 2 R$v, 4*s ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a► b a a~ A~ ~ b SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING ZOi \E RECLASSIFICATION APPLICi AT$ON RI:-:F0°EIVED PaRT 1 ~11' ( y 10 1995 spoKkNL U004rY EPJGfNEER A. GENERAL • Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE Jim Droppers, Adm i n i strator _ jYJ,AILINCJ AJ,JDRESS E. 17121 - 8th Ave a CITY Gre2nacres STATE wa ziP 99016 PHONE 924-6161 (work) (home) IF APPLICAMT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WItXTTEN OWNER AU'I'HORIZA1'I0N FOR APPLICANT Tm %RVEvangel z~CaiELutheranvGood LEGAL OWNER's NAME Samari tan Soc i ety PHO1v1~ (605) 362-3198 MA1LIIVG ADDRESS -M. Box 5038 czTY sioux Fa i l S STAT.E so Zlp 57 117-5a3s PR4TECT/PROFUSAL SIT.E AREA (acres or sq ft) 31.31 acres ADJACENTT AREA flWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) 167.05 , ASSESSC)R PARCEL #S OF PR4JECT/PROPOSAL V ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA QWNED OFt CQNTROLLED ~f STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOS AL E. 17121 - 8th Ave. EXTSTING Z(JNE CLASSIFTCATTON(S) (DATE FSTABLISHED) UR 3.5 EXISTNG USE OF PROPERTY Nurs i nq Home/Ret i rement Apartments PROP4SED ZONIIVG U R 12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCH40L DISTRICT Centra 1 Va 11 ey FTRE DISTRICT #1 _ WATER FLJRVEYOR ✓ PRQPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Smgle family dwellings Duplexes (X) Multifamily dwelLngs (X) Manufactured homes ( ) Busmess ( ) Industn.al ( ) Mixed Use ( } Other - Descnbe Nursinq Home (AI 1 current uses - no change) LIST PREVTC7L7S PLANIVING DEPARTMENT ACTIC7NS INVQLVING THIS PR4PERTY None ' B. LEGA,L/Z01vE RECLASSIFICA'TION INFORMATIQN-, LC)CATION QF PROFC?S AL ~f 'SECI'ION 19 T4WNSHIF 25 RANGE 45 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Tschirley, 8th WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRUNTIlYG ON PUBLIC ROAD - 19461.681 . ~ Z+DNE RECLASSIFICATION APFLICATION , Page 2 of 4 D4ES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCES S TO AN ARTEN.IAL (]R PLANNED ARTEKIAL YES (X ) NO NAME(S) OF AR'IERIAL ROADS nearest 1 s ADnlewav LEGAL DESCRIPTION 4F PROPERTY FOR EACH ZaNE RECT..ASSIFICA'x'I4N PROPC}SED ~ EXISTTNG ZONE{S} UR 3.5_ TC) PROPOSED ZC?NE(S)_ U R 12 FOR THE FQLLOWIlNG DESCRIBED PRQPERTY (ATTACH LEGAL DESCRIPTI4I'd STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIAE BEL4w . That portion of Government Lot 2, Section 19, T25N, R45E, W.M. lying South of the P1at of Apply Valley Estates 2nd Additian and that portion deeded to James and Lenore Wirth Dated Novemeber 5, 1986, together with the North 609099 feet of the SW 1/4 of Section 19, T25N, R45E, W.M. EKCEPT the East 1335a57 feet thereofo _ IF YOU D4 NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE FRaPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTBR.EST IN IT? _ Hold Title WHAT A,RE THE CHANGED CONDITTONS OF THE AREA WHICH Y4U FEEL MAKE THIS PRQP4SAL WARRANTED? We want to raMe thiS parcel sQ that our use nf the property will no lonQer be a non-conformin4 use. As a non-cvnforminq use, we cannot even build a caroort for our vansa We are orovidin4 the same services here that we ahve for 30 vears. We would Iike avpropriate zonrng. WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROP'C)SED ZONE RECLASSZFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES') None WHAT FACTORS SUPPURT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC?N') -DP rurrPn . use has, hP _n- ln existence for over 30 y ars; ~t ooes not have anynegative imDact. n4 thp a_r?a p_and we should hP aW Pto noPrate without the ha_rrassment -nf-0 non-conformina use c2LI ajon. WHAT MEASURES DQ YUU PRQPOSE TO MITIGATE YOUR PROFOSAL'S IIVPAGT aN SUtR4UNDIING LAND USE'? Since there r s no use change beinq propvsed for this parcel, there should be no perceived impact on surraunding land use. . w ZONE RECLASSIFICATION A.PPLICATION Page 3 of 4 . PAR'I' II THIS SECTION OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFTCATION THAT THE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATTON SHALL BE INCORPORATED W THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANIVING DEPARTMENT , FIRE MARSHALL/FIRE DISTRICT A THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECTIO ICT NO I B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMENTS (HAVE) QAYE NO BEEN MADE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PROVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM AND FACILIT'IES FOR FIRE PROTECTION PURPOSES C REC4MMENDED FIRE FLOW OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUII..DING PERMIT APPLICATION ?TME D REQUIREMENTS INCLUDE ~ -r RC dcvi L~ FTRE DISTRICT ~ SIGNATUREfrITLE DATE WATER PURVEYOR A SATISFACTORY ARR NTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS AVW (HAVE NOT) BEEN MADE B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS WATER DISTRICT S G A EE DATE , ~ COUNTY ENGINEER ~ f A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS ZOo, AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH TI-E APPLICANT A COMMENTS r \ c.a r l- ~ S I G N A TURE f ITTLE DATE COUNTY UTILITIES pl~l A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (HAV~ IyOT~ ~EN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS ~~y5~ ~ L~ -e A COMMENTS .~ec,,. r,/ - ~ ~ 4~ 5 ° Av / SIGNATURE/TITLE DATE ~ HEALTH DISTRICT "vG4 A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLAE RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL 4F THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) AVE 1VOT EEN SATISFIED A COMMENTS , d / ~ ~ SIG A~ /ITTLE~X D SEWER PURVEXOR A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER A.RE UNDERSTOOD BY THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS 1 jr- SIGNATUREfrITLE DATE , ~ %m , Z4NE RECLASSIFICATIQN APPLYCATTON Page 4 of 4 a ~~~T IH ' SURVEYOR VERIFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICENSED LAND SURVEYQR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATI4N REQUES'IED FC3R THE ZQMING MAP AND WRITTEN LEGAL DESCRIPTION SIGNED _ DATE ~ PHONE :k5l ADDRESS 'on ZIP ~ • PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY (JWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTH4RIZATI4N) I, T'HE LINDE,RSIGNED, SWEAR OR AFFIRM UNDER PEI°1ALT'Y OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR 4R AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECQRD OF THE AREA PRQFOSED FOR THE PREVTQUSLY IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTTQN, QR, TF 1`1QT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTICUNS QN HIS//fiiER BEFiALF NAME Jim Droppers, Adminlstrator DqTF, 3-28-1995_ ADDRESS E o 17121 - Sth Ave pHpNE 924-6161 Greenacres, WA ZEP 99016 C gGJATURE OF APPLItkNT OR REPRESENTATIVE DATE STATE OF WASHIIVGTflN } ) ss covNTY OF sPOx.ANE 7 SIGNED AP1D SWORN QR A,FFIRMED BEFORE ME ON THIS DAY OF 1994, BY LrY~ ~ ~ c , ~►s~ ~Wr r.---- NUTARY SEAL - - i. .~i , - - - y---J 1 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Resid.ing at My appointment expires =PA It'T V ('I'Q BE CUMPLETED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) DATE SUBMITTED FILE # DATE ACCEF'TED BY TOTAL FEES RECEIPT # C SPU"KANE COUNTY PLANNING\\," ~ ZONE RECLA.SSIFICATION APP~ICATg01~`~ ~ PAR'lC I A. GENERAL INFORMA,TTOJSI Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE J im Droppers, Adm i n i strator MAILING ADDRESS E. 17121 - 8th Ave. CITY Greenacres STATE WA ZIP 99016 PHONE 924-6161 (work) (home) IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORYZA'IeION FOR APPLICANT TO The vEvange fjjE a lELutheranvGvod LEGAL 4WNER'S NAME Samaritan Soclety pHpNE (605) 362-3198 MAILING ADDRESS P° Q° Bo.x 5038 CITy S i oux Fa 11 s STATE SD Zlp 57117-5038 PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 31.31 acres ADJACENf AREA OWNED 4R CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) 167.05 ASSESSOR PARCEL #S OF PROJECT/PROPOSAL ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL E. 17121 - 8th Ave. EXISTING ZONE CLASSTFICATION(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR 3.5 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Nursinq Home/Retirement Apartments PROPOSED ZONING U R 12 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCHOOL DISTxICT Centra 1 Va 11 ey FIRE DISTRICT # 1 WATER PURVEYOR PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY Single family dwellings Duplexes (X) Mulefamily dwellings (X) Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industnal ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other - Descnbe Nurs i nq Home ( Al l current uses - no change ) LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACTIONS 1NVOLVING THIS PROPERTY None B. LEGALIZONE R]ECLASSIIFICA'Y'IOjN INFO1RMA'I'InN.1 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 45 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROvIDING ACCESS Tsch i r 1 ev , Sth WIDTH OF PROPERTY FR4NTING ON PUBLIC ROAD 19461.681 ~ . Z4NE RECLASSIFICATT4N APJ ~ ..?age 3 of 4 r r THIS SECTIQN OF THE APPLICATI( ::,NT STAFF WITH WRITTEN VERIFICATIQN THAT TH JLTATTCIN WITH THE AGENCLES IDENTLFIED RESULTS ~ ..L BE INC4RPt)RATED IIV THE PROP4SAL BEFORE FINAL lT' . ~ FI1 A THIS PROP{)SAL iS WITHIN B ADEQUATE ARRANGEMEI% 'O MEET OUR NEEDS IN PRQVIDING F4R .AN ADL , R FIRE PROTECTIGN PURPOSES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINITIVE, AND WILL BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT A.PPLICATION TIME D REQUIR.EMENTS INCLUDE . csn ,Y-~aL~ ~ ~itE ~c'~i ~/,7 / i•~s~c~ia~ ~'~a q FIRE DISTRICT SIG14A'1'UREMTLE I7ATE WATER PURVEY4R A SATISFACTORY ARR ,ANGBONTS FOR DOMESTIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS AV {HAVE NOT} BEEN MADE B REQUIREMENTS/COMMENTS WSOf. r ~A ~6 Tiz~. ~ %gll~ 3 WATER DISTRICT S G A E DATE C4UNTY ENGINEER j,p 4- o~ Zoo, A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSIQN HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FtJR RUADS AND DRAINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS C-a L~ ~ _ SIGNATURE/'I ITLE DATE COUNTY UTILITIES A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE)(HAV~ ~QT~ ~EN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED W ATER FURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE IS Gt.~ A COMMENTS -dor 7 ~1' ~ ,~l~' -~v ~c,..• tf ~ - ~ 'f 5 _ ~..~s LJ.. ~ 1L1 SIGNATURE!'TITLE DATE r HEALTH DISTRIC"Y' A PRELIMINARY DiSCUSSIQN HAS TAKEN PLAEE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMTTTAL +JJF THIS PR4POSAL (HAVE) (HAVE NQT) BEEN SATISFIED A COMMENTS S IGNATUREjTITLE DATE SEWER PURVEY4R A PRELTMINARY DISCUSSIQN HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUTREMENTS FQR THE PR(3VISIQN OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTQQD BY THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS i , A ly.5 -~`J - SIGNATUREfI'ITLE DATE 'r'ERiVIIT CENTER PASSPORT - - o Date Number 0 Name " Phone ~ ~ C( Address a Comments CUSTOfUIER ROUTI(VG , ~ BUtLDINC Department i ~ PLANNING Department If-NGIMEER'S Department = Addressing _ Admin Exception ~ Approach Permit i Bwlding Pennit i Artenal Rd Plan Info ~ F7ood Plain Permit Code Information Binding Site Plan Info Public/Pnvate Roads _ Commercial Review i Cert of Exemption _ Res Bldg Permit Rev Conference Comprehensive Plan Site Dramage Info _ Energy Code Info = Cond Use Permit i Subdivision Review _ Fire Safety Review i Nonconfom>>ng Use i Utility Permit Manufactured Home Permit Review Zoe Change Revie w : Mechanical Perzuits ~ Shorelines Info Other Permits Short Plat Info 1+10 FBE 1ZE QU1 17 ! = Re-viewer Time out ~ Plumbing Percnits = Subdivision Info ~c-o I I i Private Road Info i Temp Use Pemut I UTILITIES Department ~ i Rcsidential Review _ Variance Appl i APA I'ayment Sewer Pecluits Zone Check Cert of LxempUon ~ i Zone Info = Subdrvision Review ULID/Sewer Info Zone Change Review i 1V0 TEE FZEQUIIZED ~ i 1V0 T-E REQUIIZEd) Reviewer Timc out Revicwer Time out Reviewer Time out I I I I MAS7FRIPASSPORI CIA vim ~ TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9500507 DATE: 04/05/95 .a . ~ ~ . • APPLICANT: RUNDQUIST & HARD, PS PHONE= ADDRESS: 10 N POST ST #601 SPOKANE WA 99201 CONTACT NAME: RUNDQUIST & HARD, PS PHOIJE= TRANSACTION: REZONE PERMIT APPLICATION SIGN-OFFS (ENGR & UTIL) DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) COMMENTS: FOR PARCEL #57117.5038 FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT ZONING PERMIT 1 200.00 LAND USE ACTION REVW 1 20.00 TOTAL DUE = 220.00 TOTAL PAID= 220.00 BALANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 04/05/95 00002614 5480 220.00 PROCESSED BY: KATHY CUMMINGS PRINTED BY: KATHY CUMMINGS THANK YOU ******,r*****************************