Loading...
ZE-020A-95 y VIECE VED DE C 0 4 1997 ~ SPOKAIVE COTJNT4' FIEARING EXAMINER W0KANECWtTvLNk-AF~V, RE Change of Conditions in the existing Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT, Residential-12 (UR-12) Zone } CONCLUSIONS, Applicant Spokane Valley Good Samantan Village ) A.ND DECISION Fzle No ZE-20A-95 } I SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISICIN Proposal• Application fvr a change of conditions to a prevlous rezone decision 1n the existing Urban Residential-12 zone, for the development of 50 retirement/elderly apartment unrts on approximately 18 26 acres of land Decision: Approved, sub1ect to conditlons II. FIl`dDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 0 The Heann~ Examiner has reviewed the application for a change of conditions and the evidence of record, and hereby adopts the following findzngs of fact and conclusions a A. GENERAI., INFORNIATIUN: Applicant Evan;elical Lutheran Good Samantan Society, dba Spokane Valley Good Samantan Vallage, 17121 East 8'h Avenue, Greenacres, WA 99016 Agent: Frank Ide, Taylor Engineenna, 106 West Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA 99201 Address: Not yet assigned for tlus site Location • Generally located along the south side of S" Avenue, between Flora Road extended and Tschirley Road, in the SW '/4 of Section-24-Townshi5 North, Ranc-reA4 EWM, Spokane County, Washington / P - -2- = Zoning: Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) Comprebensive Plao Category: The subject property is designated within the Urban categvey of the Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan The property is also located withln the Pnonty Server Service Area (PSSA), Urban Impact .Area and Aquifer Sensltive Area designated by the Comprehensive Plan Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued 'vy the Division of Building and Planning on January 6, 1997 HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Pacre 1 / Site I)escriptton • The site is currently undeveloped, except for a caretaker's residence located in the northeast corner of the property and four maintenance sheds located in the northwest corner of the site Two existing man-made ponds used as sewage lagoons are located in the middle portion of the site The subject property is relatively flat in topography, with some hills and cliffs, and clusters of basalt rock outcroppings Dense trees and shrubs are scattered throughout the site The Spokane County Cntical Areas maps indicate the possibility of geological hazards (erodible soils) and two Type N wetlands on the property The wetland areas are located in the area of the two manmade ponds and in an area north of the easternmost pond adjacent to 8`h Avenue Surrounding Conditions• The site lies along the south side of 8"' Avenue, which terminates to the east at Tschirley Road Tschirley Road extends north several blocks to Sprague Avenue, which is designated as a Pnncipal Artenal by the County Artenal Road Plan Saltese Creek is located some distance north of the site, and flows into Shelley Lake to the west In 1995, the site and about 13 adjacent acres lying between Saltese Creek and 8"' Avenue and owned by the applicant were rezoned from the Urban Residential-3 5(iJR-3 5) zone to the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone See rezone decision m Building and Planning File No ZE-20-95 A nursing home and retirement facility was developed previous to the rezone on the 13 acres 1}ring north of 8' Avenue In 1996, the applicant applied for a preliminary plat, rezone from the . UR-3 5 zone to the UR-7 zone, and planned urut development, in order to develop 28 duplex lots on 19 6 acres 1}nng immediately east of the site See Building and Planning File No PE-1803- 96/ZE-46-96/PUDE-5-96 The applicant also owns an adjacent 138 acres in addition to the ° adjacent 13 acres to the north and the 19 6 acres adjacent to the east The land south, east and west of the site is currently vacant and undeveloped Except on the north, the land adjacent to the site is all zoned Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) Single-family residences are found north of the applicant's land lying north and east of the site Project IDescription: The rezone decision in File No ZE-20-95 required the applicant to develop the ongina131 acres involved in general accordance with the onginal concept presented to the Heanng Examiner Committee in 1995 See Finding of Fact, Conclusions and Order dated 7-20-95 The purpose of the rezone was to recognize the existing nursing home/elderly apartments facility on the portion of such site located north of 8' Avenue as a permitted use in the UR-12 zone, and to allow the construction of carports The site development plan in File No ZE-20-95 did not illustrate development of the current stte for 50 retirement/elderly apartments, as currently proposed The current change of conditions applications seeks approval of a new site plan for the current site The site plan of record for the current site illustrates a single multifamily structure, with the caretaker's residence and man-made ponds remaining on site and an indication that the sheds would be relocated The design also includes six-foot-wide pedestnan pathways, and areas of maintained as well as natural landscaping The proposal would have a net density of approximately 2 7 units per acre, with a building coverage of only three percent (3 The environmental checklist indicates that the apartment building would be two-story, approximately 30 feet in height The Division of Building and Planrung administratively approved a waiver of the wall requirement of the UR-7 zone applicable to the property lines of the site adjacent to UR-3 5 zoning, and also granted partial relief regarding certain landscaping requirements applicable along such property lines See letter dated 9-4-96 from Taylor Engineenng to Louis Webster, and letter dated 9-20-96 from Louis Webster to Taylor Engineenng The applicant HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 2 proposes to vacate 8`h Avenue and replace it with a p1-ivate road, through which an access easement would be granted for the proposal If 8" Avenue is not vacated, the applicant would be required to make road improvements to such road The proposal would be served by public sewer and water County Engineenng has requested the applicant to contnbute a pro rata share for installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Appleway Avenue and Sprague Avenue B. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION: Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14 620 Hearing Date and Locatlon• January 29, 1997, Spokane County Public Works Building, Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA Notices: Mailed January 8, 1997, by applicant Posted January 10, 1997, by applicant Published December 20, 1996 Compliance The legal requirements for public notice have been met Site Visit: January 28, 1997 . Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution No 96-0171 (Heanng Examiner Ordinance) and Resolution No 96-0294 (Heanng Examiner Rules of Procedure) 0 Testimony: Francine Shaw Scott Engelhard Division of Building and Planning Division of Enguleenng and Roads 1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260 Stan Schultz Frank Ide Witherspoon, Kelley Taylor Engineenng 1100 U S Bank Building West 106 Mission Spokane, WA 99201 Spokane, WA 99201 Jim Droppers Pat Dowrung 17121 East 8`hAvenue 17022 East 4~' Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 Veradale, WA 99037 Items Noticed: Spokane County Comprehensive Plan, Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Code, and Spokane County Resolution Nos 96-0171 and 96-0294 Also, final rezone decision in Building and P1aluung File No ZE-20-95 Procedural matter: The Heanng Examiner incorporated the record from Buildincr and Planning File Nos PE-1803-96/ZE-46-96/PUDE-5-96, including the project file for such matter and the testimony and documents submitted at the January 29, 1997 public heanng in such matter, which was held immediately after the heanng in the present matter Thus consolidation of records was based on the common applicants and issues between the two projects The Heanng Examiner indicated approval for both projects at the end of the second public heanng HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 3 7 C. LANI) USE ANA-LYSIS: The review process for a change of conditions application is somewhat unclear The Heanng Examiner Ordinance requires the Examiner to set forth the manner in which a decision on a change of conditions application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and authonzes the Examiner to consider the Comprehensive Plan and applicable development regulations in rendenng a decision See Resolution 96-0171, Attachment "A", Section 11 Therefore, the application should generally conform to the Comprehensive Plan, and must comply with the development standards of the UR-12 zone and other applicable provisions of the Zorung Code, the provisions of SEPA and the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, and other applicable land use regulations Consideration should also be given to the conditions of approval attached to the rezone decision in File No ZE-20-95 With these land use controls in mind, the Heanng Examiner may impose conditions on the change of conditions application to protect the public health, safety and general welfare, or to mitigate environmental impacts It must be kept in mind that a change of conditions is not a rezone, because it does not change the actual zone of the property However, the permitted uses= location of buildings, landscaping, and other features of the site development plan are nevertheless subject to review by the Examiner e The following findings of fact and conclusions are made 1 The nronosal izenerallv conforms with the Spokane Countv Generallzed Comprehensive Plan The proposal is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The Urban category is intended to provide the opportunity for a"citylike" environment, which includes vanous land uses, residential development and a high level of public facilities and urban services It is primanly a residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-family, and condominium bulldings along with neighborhood commercial, light industnal, and public and recreational facilities The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of one (1) to 17 Luuts per acre, with allowances for "bonus densities" within developed areas where utilities, artenals, schools, and community facilities have already been established The more intensive uses in the Urban category, such as light industnal and neighborhood commercial, would be located near or along the heavily traveled streets The least intensive single-family residential uses should be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, and multifamily structures will usually be a transitional use located beriveen single-family residential and the more intensive areas See Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed Definition" The Urban category includes the following relevant goals, objectives and decision guidelines Goal l 1 Encouf age a variety of housing types and densctces Objective 1 1 a Promote fill-in tivithtn establrshed development areas and existing outlying commtcr:itres where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilaties have already been establashed Decascon Gicideltne 1 1 1 Urbaii clevelopment will be approved in areas hctving adeqtcate power sicpplaes, vvater, sanitary and storm sewers, streets, and school and fire services, provided that such development HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 4 meets the intent of other Objectcves and Decision Guidelcries of this section Objective 1 1 b Hrgher-denscty developments such as miclti family and mobale homes (manufactured homes) parks shoztld be-located wirh direct or near access to the major arterlal systems rather than on interior neighborhood streets Access to pubic transportatron shozrld also be considered Objectrve 1 1 c When multifamily dwelling are to be located adjacent to single fcrmily areas, careful consideration must be gcven to the density and designs of the multiple farrcily development so as to erisicre protection of the crmenines of the srngle family area Decision Giccdellne 1 12 Base net densiry for single J'amily dwellrng areas and for multifamily dwellcng areas may be cncreased through bonus options, bonus densrties, zero lot lines or simclar methods when meetzng the fill-in crcterla Decision Guidelrne 113 A miiltifamily dwelling structure exceeding three (3) residenhal units or a development of such structures or . manufactured homes (except those on single family lots) should a) locate adjacent designated artertals, b) locate near existrng or planned ptcblic transit routes, a c) zmprove or maintain the cortststency of adjacent srngle family arnenctres Decision Gtcideline 114 A varrety of densities and residential uses should be available to provtde a freedom of choice to live in Urban areas with varying densities, combanatiofzs, or mrx of tises (see detailed Urban definitcons) Decision Gaccdeline 116 Development utzlizing constnsctron methods, site planntng and/or landscaprng methods which are considered innovative should be approved if the intent of Plan Objectives or Decision Cuzdeltnes cs malntained Decision Guideline 12 Z The need for recreation and open space created by residenhal developments shozcld be met and be rn conformance with ordanances, plans, and policres prior to resldential development approvat Decision Gurdeline 13 3 All Urban development proposals should reqtcire publac sanitary ajid storm sewer systems or cntenm sewer systems to protect tivcrter quality Goal 15 Encourage a healthfcrl and pleasing environment in the County's rescdentcal areas Objective 15 a New residential or multip[e family should be buffered fYOm exrsttng adjacent land acses where adverse effects may develop HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 5 Decision Gucdeline 15 1 BuffeYing and/or landscaping will be used to mctlgate the differences between proposed developments and existrng uses Decision Guideline 15 4 Sidewalk facrllties will be required along artercals connecttng residenttal aYeas wcth community facilities and/or commerccal areas Objective 15 d Residentaal areas should be dcscouraged wathin high nocse level zones szcch as in the vcccnity of acrports, rallroads and freeways Objective 15 e When a netghborhood experiences pressure for change cn character, such change shall be permitted upon appropriate revicew Objective 1 S f Consider the profile, especcally heaght, of the existing neighborhood when evaluating multifamily developments Objective 15 g In many tnstances, mobile homes and multifamily development may be appropriate to renew resadential areas Deccscon C'rucdeline 15 7 Before approvang any multifamtly houstng or , manufactured home development proposals, at should be determined that such development will enhance the residential character or aesthetacs or wall improve residential valzces of the area 0 Objective 1 S 8 When determining whether a proposal wcll change the existing land use character of an area, factors to consider may anclzrde a) the structure heaght of the proposal rn relatron to structure height of nearby structures, arid b) whether new structures will have a positive or negatcve impact upon the neaghborhood's architectural character Decisaon Guicleline 1 61 Before land use proposnls are approved they should a) conform to plans, polccies and regulatcons of Coacnty water, sewer, storm sewer, utility and speclal servace drstrccts, b) conform to County transportation plans and policies, and c) tdenttfy and take steps to resolve signtficant adverse tmpacts upon extstzng utilctaes, (i e water, sanitary and storm sewers, utilcty, available and future energy resotcrces), and traffz'c systems The property is also within the Urban Impact Area (UTA) designated by the Comprehensive Plan See Comprehensive Plan, Section 14 This is an area where growth, development and higher intensities of land use are encouraged Comprehensive Plan, Objectlve 14 1 a Traditional urban problems such as incompatible land uses, environmental pollution and traffic congestion are to be managed with greater attention to the general public's well-being inside the UTA Comprehensive Plan, Objective 14 1 e HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 6 Y The site is currently zoned Urban Residential-12 (UR-12), wluch zone is intended to add to the vanety of housing types and densities, and be an implementation tool for the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan UR-12 areas typically include multiple-family dwellmgs frequently used to provide a transition between low-density residential zones and intensive business zones Zoning Code 14 620 100 UR-12 areas are generally charactenzed by paved roads, public sewer and water, accessibility to schools and libranes, and a full line of public servlces including manned fire protection and public transit accessibility The purpose of the UR-12 zone is to set standards for the orderly development of residential property in a manner that provides a desirable living environment that is compatible with surrounding land uses and assures the protection of property values While the project is not located along an artenal, it has reasonably converuent access along Tschirley Road to Sprague Avenue and Appleway Avenue, which are designated as Pnncipal Artenal by the Spokane County Artenal Road Plan While the site is not located along a public transit route at the current time, it is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the Spokane County Zoning Code See Zoning Code 14 300 100, definitions Elderly housing does not generate near the traffic that general multifamily uses do, since the residents are not usually employed or live with children Further, the applicant indicates that the residents of the project will be served by pnvate vans and shuttles The land adjacent to the site on the north, south and east is owned by the applicant The land north of the site is improved with an existing retirement facility, and the applicant has proposed the development of duplexes and UR-7 zorung for the land east of the site The land east of the site is vacant 0 The Urban category recognizes that multifamily housing may serve to renew a residential area, and indicates that when a neicrhborhood expenences pressure for change, such change may be allowed upon appropnate review The Urban category indicates that multifamily housing should improve or maintain the amenities of adjacent single-family areas, vvith particular attention given to the design and densihes of multifamily development Considenng the isolation of the srte from any developed single-family areas, and the distance between the proposed multifamily complex and the land adjacent to the site on the west, there is little potential for land use conflict with adjacent land uses The applicant owns 170 acres north and east of the site The proposed height of the multifamily structure on the site is less than the 35- foot maximum allowed in the UR-3 5 zone Since the current site is a separate legal parcel from the 13 acres 1}nng north of the site, the residential densrty of the site can be considered separate from the residential density of the acreage to the north, which is improved with an existing retirement facility The 50 assisted living uruts proposed in the proJect have been charactenzed as "retirement/elderly apartments", which are a kind of multi-family dwelling See Zoning Code 14 300 100 Under this analysis, the residential net density on the 18 3 acres of the current site would be only 2 7 units per acre This density is easily witlun the recommended residential density range of the Urban category, and is less than the maximum density allowed in the UR-3 5 zone The proJect will be served by a high level of public services, including public sewer, modern utilities and paved roads Such "fill-in development" is encouraged in the Urban category See Comprehensive Plan, Glossary, definition of "fill-in development" The applicant is required to make road improvements to 8"' Avenue, if such road is not vacated at the applicant's request, and is required to contnbute funds toward the installation of a traffic signal at HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 7 i the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Appleway Avenue The applicant is also required to participate in a future road improvement distnct formed to improve Tschirley Road, including the installation of additional asphalt, sidewalk, curb and draina~e control The record indicates that shallow or rocky soils exist on the site, which may not be adequate for the use of drywells and alternative stormwater disposal methods The applicant intends to perform geotechnical tests to determine the suitability of drywells, and intends to route stormwater via curbing and grading to detention ponds and natural drainage ways See Envlronmental Checklist County Engineenng has generally accepted this conceptual drainage plan The applicant will be required to prepare a final drainage analysis and plan consistent with County stormwater regulations, pnor to the issuance of a building permit This includes consideration of impacts to groundwater and properties downstream from any proposed retention ponds and drywells The proposal does not intend to develop the steep slopes on the site There is a difference of opinion between the applicant's engineer and the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding the status of the ponds as wetlands under the County's Cntical Areas Ordinance The applicant is requued to prepare a wetlands report to resolve thls issue, and protect and provide sufficient buffers for any wetlands identified on the site The site development plan shows the ponds Ueing preserved in their current state . Very little opposition to the project was submitted by neighbonng property owners Pat Dowrung, who lives north of the site at the corner of Fourth Avenue and Flora Avenue, expressed concern at the public heaf ing regarding traffic impacts from the project down 4`n Avenue and Flora Road to Sprague Avenue However, neither County Engineenng nor the traffic study prepared by the applicant's engineer identified impacts to such roads as a concern There is no empincal evidence that traffic would use such route to access Sprague Avenue, and neither the applicant nor the County have plans to extend Steen Road between the applicant's adi acent project to the east and Flora Road A letter of opposition regarding both projects was also submitted by Pam and Mike Bendix, who reside well east of the site, on 8"' Avenue east of Long Road The letter contended that the projects were inconsistent with surrounding land uses, that increased traffic from the projects would endanger elementary and junior high students along Tschirley Road, that visibility along Tschirley Road was impaired, that there was insufficient infrastructure to support the proJects, and that the projects would negatively impact the environment However, none of these assertions was supported by competent evidence that would support a finding that deficiencies exist that render the project inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan The proposal would not impact school capacity, since it is directed at senior housing There is no evidence that the capacity of Tschirley Road for traffic will be exceeded due to the two proJects, that such road is dangerous for travel from a traffic engineenng standpoint at the present time, or that students wallcing to Greenacres Elementary School and Greenacres Juruor High will be placed in danger from increased traffic along Tschuley Road Tschirley Road is not heavily traveled at the current time, and retirement housing generates far less traffic than general housing, County Parks and the Central Valley School District did not comment of the proposal County Utilities expressed no concern regarding the availability of sewer capacity for the project HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 8 v The Division of Building and Planning found the proposal to be consistent with the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan See Staff Report The Heanng Examiner also adopts the analysis of the project's consistency with the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, contained in the attachment to the rezone application It is noted that the applicant owns 170 acres south and west of the site The proposal is consistent with the applicant's retirement facility located north of the site, the site is separated topographically from other land uses, and the few land uses located nearby will not be significantly impacted The owner of 40 acres lying near the site to the east expressed support for the project See letter dated 1-20-97 from Ibchard Dahm 2 The proposal, as conditioned. will not be detnmental to the public health, safetv and !aeneral welfare. and comulies with the Svokane Countv Zonina Code and other applicable develonment regulations As indicated above, the proposal generally conforms with the policies of the Comprehensive Plan The proposal, as conditioned, is also consistent with the development standards of the UR- ] 2 zone and the Zoning Code The Heanng Examiner has added conditions of approval to assure enforcement of the provisions of the County's Cntical Areas Ordinance, regarding wetlands and geologically hazardous areas a Very little opposition was expressed toward the project, and the proposal appears reasonably compatible with neighbonng land uses The proposed net density of the proposal is significantly below the maximum net density allowed in°the UR-12 zone The proposal will be served by adequate infrastructure, as discussed above The proposal will help meet the need for senior housing in the area 3 The prooosal 2enerallv complies with the orovisions of the State Environmental Policv Act and the Countv's Local Environmental Ordinance, No comments were received from public agencies requesting modification or withdrawal of the Deternunation of Nonsignificance issued for the project The record does not indicate any significant, probable adverse environmental impacts from the proposal The procedural requirements of chapter 43 21 C RCW and chapter 11 10 of the Spokane County Code have been met III. DECISYON Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions above, the proposed zone reclassification zs hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the vanous agencies specified below The conditions of approval recommended by public agencies which have been significantly altered oi added to by the Heanng Examiner are rtallcized Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval by the Heanng Examiner HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 9 J SPOKANE COQJNTY DIVISIC)N OF BiJIb,I)ING ANID PI.ANNING 1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the Critccal Areas Ordinance, as amended 2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Heanng Examiner Vanations, when approved by the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All vanations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be maintained 3 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project or other suitable guarantee pnor to release of building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired 4 Approval is required by the Division Director/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building permit 5 Direct light from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary 6 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Norice noting that the property in question is subject to a vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action Tlus Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded witlun the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planrung The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows The parcel of property legally descnbed as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Heanng Examiner or Admuustrative Official on imposing a vanety of special development conditions File No ZE-20A-95C is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning 7 A title notice prepared the Divcscon of Building and Plannang shall be recorded on the property or portaon of the property containing a wetland or wetland buffer area The title notice shall contacn language prohibiting cn perpetuity the development, alterataon or disturbance of vegetation withcn the wetlands or tivetland buffer areas except when in conformance wcth the Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance, as amended S Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating additional lots/parcels shall be reviewed by the Director of the Division of Building and Planivng/designee for compliance with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and all other applicable local, state and federal ordinances and development regulations, as amended HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 10 SPOI{ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING ANI) ROAI)S Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: 1 Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer m conjunction with a County Road Project/Road Improvement Distnct, whichever comes first 2 Applicant shall dedicate the applicable nght of way for construction of a cul-de-sac at the terminus of 8"' Avenue 3 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer 4 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans 5 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health Distnct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased 6 A parlcing plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parlung stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineenng practices Pavmg or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project wluch is to be occupied or travelcd by vehicles 7 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resoluhon wluch purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct (1ZID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36 88, as amended Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements This provision is applicable to Tschirley Road 8 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein byj oining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required unprovement Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these unprovements Th.is provision is applicable to Tschirley Road 9 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 10 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Sechon for the improvement of 8" Avenue which is adJacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development and includes construction of a cul-de-sac at the terminus of 8" Avenue Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed 11 All requued improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bndge construction and other applicable county standards and/or HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 11 : adopted resolutions pertairung to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 12 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 13 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed nght of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road nght of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 14 All required construction within the existing or proposed public nght of way is to be completed pnor to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer 15 A traffic analysis accepted by the County Engineer indicates that an unacceptable level of service exists at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Tschirley Road Due to unacceptable level of service the applicant shall contnbute a pro-rata share for installation of a traffic signal located at the intersec'Uon of Sprague Avenue and Appleway Installation of a signal may result in realignment of certain roads and intersections in the area 16 The site plan of reCord for this proposal indicates that 8" Avenue is to be vacated No application for the vacation of 8' Avenue has been accepted by the County Engineer at this time Vacations of Spokane County Right of Way are heard by the Board of County Commissioners 17 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter denved, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, asstgns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authonze Spokane County to include the above descnbed property in a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct for improvement of the road(s) descnbed below by requesting and authonzing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct pursuant to RCW 36 88 050, or by requesting and authonzing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 88 030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID beincr formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35 43 RCW If a RID is proposed for unprovement of the road(s) descnbed below, said owner(s) and successor(s) further agree (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be denved from the formatlon of the R.ID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed, provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in con~unction with the formation of a RID by HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 12 either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the Supenor Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll, provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authonzed by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of properiy within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below This provision is applicable to Tschirley Road 18 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regazdmg these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to deternune whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessuy work 19 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards ° SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF vTILITIES 1 The dedication shall state "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition metnod pursuant to RCW 36 94 which the petition includes the owner(s) property and further not to object by signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW 36 94 which includes the owner(s) property Provided, this condition shall not prohibit the owner(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution under RCW 36 94 " 2 A wet (llve) sewer connection to the area-wide public sewer system shall be constructed A sewer coruiection permit is required 3 The applicant is required to execute a sewer connection agreement with Spokane County pnor to issuance of permit to connect 4 The applicant shall submit expressly to the Spokane County Division of Utilities, "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval prior to the finalization of the project and/or the issuance of a permit to connect HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 13 , 5 A.rrangements for payments of applicable sewer charges must be made for pnor to issuance of a sewer connection permit 6 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended SPOKANE COUNTY WATER RESOiTRCES 1 Newly formed spnngs and groundwater seeping into basements is a significant problem in the developed area lying south of the proposal The SEPA checklist indicates that geotechnical tests will be performed to determine if drywells will work in the area In addition to such tests, the applicant shall also evaluate impacts from any proposed retention ponds or drywells on properties lying downstream from such structures The applicant shall ensure that the stormwater disposal systems, lawn watenng and other development activities on the site do not cause spnngs and basement flooding to occur on downstream properties SPOKANE REGIONAL HEAI.TH DISTRIC'I' 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health 4 A public sewer system will be made available for the project and individual service will be provided to each building 5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited SPOKANE COUNTY AgR POLI.UTI0N CONTROL AU7CHORITY 1 All air pollution regulations must be met V6'ASHINGTON STATE DEPAIZ'TMENT OF ECOLOGY 1 The applicant shall submct a wetlands report for the review arid approval of the Department prior to issuance of a building permit, and demonstrate compliance wrth the Spokane Cotcnry Critical Areas Orcdcnance HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 14 . DATED this 4th day of December, 1997 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING Ex:AMINER ~i+~ ( • ~~su'~.i Michael C DemPseY, WSB~~~~ 2~'35 NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No 96-0171, the decision of the Heanng Examiner on an application for a vanance is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land use petition in supenor court pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW Pursuant to chapter 36 70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is three days after it is mailed ~ This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant on December 4, 1997 The date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is therefore December 8, 1997, counting to the next ~ business day THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS I)ECISION TO SUPERIOR COiJRT BY LAND USE PETITION IS DECEMBER 29,1997. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file dunng the appeal penod with the Office of the Heanng Examiner, Thlyd Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245 The file may be inspected dunng normal working hours, listed as Monday - Fnday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8 00 a m and 4 30 p m Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County ordinance HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-20A-95 Page 15 I'roject Status Activc ENGINEER'S ~`IEW SHEET As Built Plans Received Rezone File ZL1 -0020A-95 "95 Road Plans Approved Companion files: Nr~~ Ruacl Stanclarci; ;-l>-Q~ h7}lar Related T'iles: ZL-0020-95 lIcaring: 01/29/1997 09:00 I3uilding Dept: Technical Review: TR DRZE-213-96 Preliminary Review: Type: Large Lat _ L31dg. Square I=eet I_)ate Jti:C(:it'ctl: 0 I/061997 No. Lots: tio. :1cres: 31 Project Name UR-12 COC ADD 50 NiULTIPLE RES Site Address N. 087'I-1, W. TSCHIRLEY, IZange-Township-Sectiun: 45 - 25 - i9 PARCEI,(S): (tirst 20) Applicant Conditic,ns Nlailcii: ; i 192.901 t55192.9056 55193.90-2-1 19-3, 9041 Frank Ide Flood Zone l'es TAYLOR ENGINEERING INC Water Source 106 W. Mission, 246 Sewcr Source SPOKANE, WA 94201 Schanl Uisc 356 Phone Fax Firc Dist (509) 328-3371 (509) 328-8224 Phone Di;t Owncr SPOKANE VALLEY (;UOD SAMAfz11'AN 17121 E. 8th Av GFiEENACkES, WA 99016 Survcyor Lawrence L Le►nweber Phone TAYLOR ENGINEERING WC (509)934-6161 106 W. Mission, 206 SPOK.ANE, WA 99201 Phone Fax Building Ph 477-:675 ' Planning Ph: 477-220-5 Conlac;i: FRANCINF Sf IAW' (509) 328-3371 (509) 328-8224 Date Submitte Description Initials I:ng Need Technically Complete Eng Need Harvard Rd Mitigation Eng Need Drainage Plans Lng Need Traflic Analysis Eng Need Other Eng Pay Fees Received Eng Final Plat Fees Completed (,op\ tc, .Accounting Lng Priority Fees Received j ; Notice to Pubtic / Nutice tu Public # l 3 -l b C'ompleted - or Needs to be signed Design Deviation D1te. (In-0ut) , 7on qU3l7IleS IUl' drainage item calculated 12/04/1997 Hearing Datz Decisian Approved App Den Cond Appld BCC Appealed to f3CC Decision App Dcn Cond Appld Court Appealed to Court Decision App Den Cond Appld Stamped Mylars to Secretary (Sandy) ! Slamped 208 Lot i'lans ro Sccretary (Sandy) , 61 ~ P i 3 1 ~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER 1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)456-3600 Fax 324-3478 "ENGIIdEER' S COIQDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE T0: Spokane County Planning Department FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads DATE: 01/22/97 PROJECT: CHG OF CONDITIONS FILE ZE-020A-95 / Hearing/Review Date: 01/29/19979.00 1 Sponsor/Applicant: FRANK IDE) SPO VALLEY GOOD SAMARITAN Section Township Range: 19-25-45 Planner: FRANCINE SHAW Design/Review Date: ( @ ) The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved. Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed: Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction with a County Road Pro3ect/Road Improvement District, whichever comes first 1 Applicant shall dedicate the applicable right of way for construction of a cul-de-sac at the terminus of 8`h Avenue 2 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer 3 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans. 4 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased. 5 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles CC Applicant FRANK IDE) SPO VALLEY GOOD SAMARITAN Engineer/Surveyor LAWRENCE LEINWEBER , 1 t Page 2 4 r 01/29/1997 ZE-020A-95 6. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Tschirley Road. 7 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by 3oining and participating in a County Road Pro3ect (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements This provision is applicable to Tschirley Road 8 The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 9 The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of 8th Avenue which is ad3acent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 5-7 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development and includes construction of a cul-de-sac at the terminus of 8th Avenue Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 10 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 11 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 95-0498 as amended and are applicable to this proposal 12 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is sub]ect to inspectlon and approval by the County Engineer 13 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer ~ Page♦ 3 ' > > / 01/29/,1997 ■ - ` ZE-020A-95 14 A traffic analysis accepted by the County Engineer indicates that an unacceptable level of service exists at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Tschirley Road Due to unacceptable level of service the applicant shall contribute a pro-rata share for installation of a traffic signal located at the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Appleway Installation of a signal may result in realignment of certain roads and intersections in the area 15. The site plan of record for this proposal indicates that 8`h Avenue is to be vacated No application for the vacation of 8th Avenue has been accepted by the County Engineer at this time Vacations of Spokane County Right of Way are heard by the Board of County Commissioners 16 Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petitlon for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36 88 050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88 030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36 88 065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW If a RID is proposed for improvement of the road (s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s)further agree (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88 090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll, provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property ~ r t~ Page 9 J 01/29/1997 ZE-d20A-95 It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements requirecl shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary particl.pation by Spokane County The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below This provision is applicable to Tschirley Road 17 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation far ad]ustments or relocation regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work 18 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards C`-covd ~ , ~ ~ l ~ ~ . CAAjtt,_t ~ j ~ . ~ ~ oVL- / J C ~ ow ~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ 1996 FINAL BUILDING PERMITS April 3 1996 FINALIZED SITE ADDRESS NAME & PROJECT PARCEL # FILE# MYLAR BY DATE C FLORA N 4501 PUMP STATION/WATSR BOOSTER CONSOLIDATED IRR 45011 9038 894044 RT 06-09-94 FORKER N 11019 FIRE DIST #9 ADD 4614 B92102 BT 04-12-93 FORKER N 11102 OFFICE ACT/ED CENTER 4611 B70063 GN 12-31-91 YES FORKER N 11102 FOOTHILLS COMMUNITY CHURCH 4611 B92128 BT 05-04-93 FOUR MOUND W 17217 FIRE DIST #3 FIRE STATZON / MEETING RM 1605 B92135 PL 10-24-94 FRANCIS E 1327 CHG OF USE KAR RRAFT-PAII3T AUTO BODY 3629 B92076 PL 04-12-95 FRANCIS E 1623 STORAGS AUTO PRAME 3628 B89110 BM 11-22-89 ~ FRANCIS E 1627 SWANSON AUTO BODY ADD 3628 B91044 BT 07-18-91 FRANCIS E 1803 ZIESART AUTO DEALERSHIP 3628 B90053 BT 05-31-94 FRANCIS E 1907 WALT WORTHY MINI STORAGE 700 UNITS 36283 1808 B94079 RT 07-01-94 FRANCIS E 1907 CHG OF USE GYNNASIUM TO OFFZCE SPACS 3628 B90247 BT 07-30-91 FRANCIS E 1913 WORTI3Y MINI STORAGE 3628 H92063 RT 07-01-94 FRANCIS E 1925 INTER REMODEL & ADD OFFICF SPACEUBTERUIR 3628 H90248 HT 07-30-91 ERANCIS E 1925 WA ST DSHS RELOCATE STORGE BLDG - WOR'I'H 3628 891046 BT 06-13-91 ~ ~ FRANCIS E 1927 WA STATE OFFICE BLDG 3628 B90236 E-38 BT 07-30-91 FRANCIS E 2707 ED'S AUTO BODY ADD-DETAIL SHOP / KEEN 36284 0538 B95097 KM 06-30-95 N FRANCIS r' 2707 ED'S AUTO BODY SHOP AL KLEEN AUTO BODY SHOP 3628 B91080 TM 11-20-92 FRANCIS E 2707 AL KEEN ADD AUTO BODY SHOP- 3628 B90087 BT 04-19-91 FRANCIS E 2720 CAR PORT 3628 B70292 BM 11-17-89 FRANCIS E 3813 HULLPAK MFG PACKAGING MACHINES 3627 B92109 BT 02-03-93 FRANCIS E 3813 STORAGE MINI 3627 B91034 JF 07-10-91 FRJINCZS E 3815 THOMA.S WILSON SIG 3627 B70133 JS 02-21-89 F'RANCIS E 3817/3811 ELJAY OIL DIfiSEL FUfiLING STATZON 36274 9057 B94115 PL 10-24-94 FRANCIS B 3915 TOM TOMCZAK SPEC OFFICE/WHSE A 36274 9054 B95039 KM 12-18-95 FRANCIS fi 3915 AUTO REPAIR & RV STG WAS AIITO AUCTZON 36274 9054 B94186 PL 03-08-95 YES FRANCIS W 1212 INTER REMODEL RICE TIME EXPRESS 36303 9033 B93155 CR 12-07-93 FRANCIS W 1320 SIGN 3630 B70249 BM 08-01-89 FRANCIS W 320 CARWASH 3630 870085 GN 07-21-89 FRANCIS W 320 KAR BRITE SZGN 3630 B70259 GN 08-18-89 FRANCIS W 406 MINI LUBE SIGN 3630 B70266 BM 08-23-89 FRANCIS W 518 VILLAGE INN REST ADD-REMODELING 36304 2618 B94166 PL 10-28-94 FRANCIS W 618 CHEVRON REPLACE ADD STORE/CARWASH 36304 2521 B93058 BT 06-14-93 FRANCIS W 802 KENTUCKY F CHICK ADD REMODEL 3630 B70153 JS 04-04-89 FREEMAN WA ADD TO SCHOOLS (S 14917 JACKSON RD) 4302 B70187 SE 08-24-89 FRfiYA N 12205 FOUR PLEX 36102 0231 B94032 CR 04-29-94 FREYA N 15601 MEAD SD #354 MEAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 2734 H91022 BT 07-08-91 FREYA N 6411 STOR.AGE FIREWORKS 3627 B90002 BT 05-31-94 FREYA N 6520 CONOCO SODIUM CYANIDE TERMZNAL 3627 B91035 G-40 BT 08-27-91 FREYA N 7511 URM ADD FREEZER 3627 B92052 GN 07-10-92 FREYA N 7610 LUMffiER YD/TRUSS PLANT MOMB STEfiL 36271 0308 B93101 PL 03-28-95 YES FREYA N 7610 STORAGE BLDG MOMB STEBL 36271 0308 B94112 G-48 PL 03-16-95 FREYA S 5101 PARK HTS BAPTIST CHURCH 3403 B91047 BT 11-27-91 FREYA S 5408 ICNIDI RADZO ADD - OFFICE 3403 B90108 BT 10-03-90 , FREYA S 5607 RELOCATE STORAGE BLDG 3512 B70019 HT 05-31-94 ~ GAR.DfiN SPRING W 4527 JEHOVAH'S WITtdESS CHURCH S FI KINGDOM HALL 2527 B92091 BT 12-08-92 ' GARFIELD SP CP L RESTROOM/ENTRY 1514 H70112 GN 01-25-86 GARFIELL N 400 SPO CO PARKS RESTROOM ORV PHASE 4 15144 9006 B96017 DB 01-09-96 ~j GARFIELD N OF HWY 2 SPO CO PARKS CTRL BLDG TOWER 1514 B90041 SE 04-23-90 ' GEIGER S 1905 SPOKANE PRODUCE WHSE/STRG/SHIPPING 25272 9094 B95080 G-50 PL 06-30-95 GEIGER S 1905 SPOKANE PRODUCE ADD 2 STORY OFFZCE LUNCHRM 25272 9165 B96012 DB 01-02-96 GEIGER S 2900 WASTER TO ENERGY PLANTADD-ASH HANDLING BLDG 25331 9004 B94037 PL 11-01-94 GEIGER S 2900 RfiCYCKfi CTR 2533 B70053 GN 03-10-90 GEIGER S 3025 CELLULAR COMMUNICATION BLDG 25331 0213 B94188 PL 01-27-95 GEIGER S 3025 ADD 2ND STORY OFFICE BLDG 2533 870084 GN 10-28-68 GEIGER S 3025 ALLOY TRAILERS ADD STG BLDG 25331 0217 895184 DB 12-18-95 GEIGER S 3709 SIGN 2533 B70098 BM 12-27-89 GEIGER S 3711 SHARLEY DEV RESTAUR.ANT (BO UNIT MOTEL) 24334 0121 B70008 SE 07-10-95 GEIGER S 3711 MOTEL BfiST WESTERN APT 120 UNIT /REST 25334 0124 B94156 PL 08-03-95 GEIGER S 3715 WSST PLAIN TRAVEL MOTEL, REST/TRUCK STOP 2533 B70096 GN 12-31-91 YES GEIGER S 4300 STAGZNG AREA AUTO AUCTION 25333 0302 B94043 PL 09-07-94 GEIGER S 4300 PRIVATE CAR WASH DEALfiR AUTO AUCTION 25333 0302 B94187 PL 02-21-95 GEIGER S 4300 AUTO AUCTION BLDG 2533 B90103 BT 10-23-90 GEIGER W 7626 SHOP/OFFICE GODWIN EQUZPTMENT 24051 9096 B95002 DB 03-02-95 GEIGER W 7626 GODWIN ENG REPAIR SHOP 2405 B92043 PL 02-15-95 GEIGER W 7704 MCDONKEY AUTO/BOAT SALES ADD-SHOP 24051 9072+ B94114 PL 06-28-95 YES GfiZGER W 8012 SPfiC MACHIN MFG ADD ASSfiMBLY & STORAGE 24051 9094 B93055 BT 06-22-93 GIBBS W 2205 SPO FALL'S EQUISTIAN CTR INDOOR RIDING STAB 24252 9004 B70009 SE 06-28-95 GILBERT E 21312 LONGYEAR WSELL DRILLING ADD-TRUCK WASH PAD 56334 9165 B94183 PL 11-18-94 GILBERT E 21318 ADD STORAGE W/CHG 5633 B90049 GN 05-07-90 GLENNAIRE S 5011 WATER TANIC 1 MG & VALUE VAULT 3402 B90016 SE 05-02-90 GLENNGRAE LN E 5016 POOL HOUSE/ GLENGRAE PUD PE-1565 34022 9062 B93113 CR 08-13-94 ij ~ yR fw R • ~ ~ • ~ , Y L/ ✓ ~ -us ~ - ~ ~Al) , ~~1.~ . t~ , 1996 FINAL BUILDING PERMITS April 3 1996 ~ ~ FINALI ZED SITE ADDRESS NAME & PROJECT PARCEL # FILE# MYLAR BY DATE C f EUCLID E 15128 MA'PPHEY ADD-BLDG #1 &#5 45111 9035 B94065 PL 10-25-94 SUCLID fi 15128 ADD CASTING WHSE BLDG #5 4511 B91006 BT 05-03-91 EUCLID E 15128 ADD 4511 B70232 JS 08-01-89 EUCLID E 15128 ADD WHSE & CASTING BLDG 4511 B90117 BT 12-18-90 EUCLID E 15128 #8 MA'PPHEY SOLVENT STORE BLDG 4511 B91063 BT 08-16-91 EUCLID E 15913 SPfiC BLDG SPEC WHSE (BSP-22 L4) 45122 9149 B94031 PL 07-11-94 EUCLID E 16072 WILLIAMS 'I'RUCRING ADD TANKS 45016 9091 B96009 DB 01-11-96 , EUCLID fi 16601 MOTOR FREIGHT TERMINAL 4512 B89111 GN 09-17-90 EUCLID E 16615 OFFICE WHSE 4501 B70291 BM 10-19-89 EUCLID B 16702 WESTWOOD INC SIP TANK FARM ASPHALT EMULSFIE 45121 541- B93174 PL 11-01-94 EUCLID E 16702 TRUCK REPAIR & OFFICE 4501 B70093 GN 04-19-89 EUCLID E 16702 WILLIAMS TRUCKING POLE BLDG/BOILER 45016 9090 B95156 DB 10-25-95 EUCLID fi 16702 SIGN 4510 B70277 BM 09-06-89 ~ EUCLID E 16704 PACIFIC PRIDE 4501 B70237 GN 07-21-89 EUCLID B 16710 SPEC OFFICE 4501 H70147 GN 05-24-89 EUCLID E 16710 SIGN 4501 B70247 JS 08-03-89 EUCLID E 16715 SHOP & OFFICP SPACE 4501 B70092 BM 02-10-89 EUCLID B 16909 FUELING STATION ABOVE GR TKS 4501 B70106 BM 04-12-89 EUCLID E 17002 OFFICE SFiOP 4501 B70250 BM 08-07-89 EUCLID E 17002 METRO HAULING OFFICE SHOP 3628 B70217 BM 07-03-89 EUCLID E 17002 OFFICE & SHOP 4512 B70223 GN 07-01-89 EUCLID E 17625 SPO VALLEY POULTRY 1601 B92055 BT 08-27-92 fiUCLID E 17625 H& H POULTRY ADD WHSE 55063 9088 B95141 DB 11-21-95 EUCLID E 17711 CIRCLE M CONST ADD OFFICE 5506 892003 BT 05-11-94 EUCLID E 17711 DIVERSIFIED MAINTENCE 5506 B70234 GN 11-21-69 EUCLID E 17900 GREENACERES GYPSUM STORAGE WHSE 5507 H91067 BT 09-23-91 ~ EVERGREF:t N 1011 VALLSY MONTSSORI DAYCARE 45151 1602 B94146 PL 06-28-95 YES ~ 2 EVERGRfiEN S 1121 FZRE STATZON DIST #1 45233 0913 B93154 CR 04-11-94 FAZRVIEW E 4502 KNORR,ROBERT GREENHOUSE 3511 B91058 BT 09-11-91 FAIRWOOD N 11613 PUMP STATIONS 3(COLLEGE N 10128 & LTL SPO R 3607 B91019 BT 05-20-92 FANCHER N 110 SNYDERS BAKERY ADD 35133 2306 B93123 CR 12-20-93 FANCHER N 1101 SIGN 4514 B70143 BM 03-08-89 FANCHER N 1102 BILLBOARD 3513 870176 JS 04-26-89 FANCHER N 1103 OFFICfi GSA BUREAU OF LAND MGMT 35141 404+ B93140 CR 11-22-93 FANCHER N 1414 MERCER TRUCRING ADD 3513 B92060 BT 09-29-92 FANCHER N 2110 REMODEL BLDG/SHOP 3512 889114 BT 12-06-90 FANCHER N 2206 OFFZCE - INDUSTRZAL SHOP 3512 B90096 BT 05-31-94 FANCFiER N 221 PROPANE TANKS 3514 B70052 GN 04-01-88 FANCHER N 305 OFFICE/WHSE 3514 B90026 BT 09-18-90 FANCHER N 425 SINCLAIR SIGN 3514 870123 BM 02-08-89 FANCHER N 425 T'HUNDERBIRD CONV-STORE 3514 B70101 JS 01-03-89 FANCHER N 425 TEit7NDERBIRD LUB CANOPY 3514 B70150 JS 05-11-89 FANCHER N 512 WHSE & SALES 3513 B70067 GN 08-31-89 FANCHER N 802 STORAGE FfiRTILIZER (CONKLIN S 210) 3513 B70208 BM 02-12-88 FANCHER N 900 ASC TOOL STORAGE BLDG 3513 B70182 SE 03-27-90 ' FANCHER N 900 #5 ASC MACHINE TOOLS MFG BLDG 2 STRY 35132 1025 B95109 DB 08-28-95 FANCHBR N 901 SIGN 3514 B70144 BM 03-08-89 FAR.R LN N 2509 ISC IMPACT SER MFG ROCK CRUSHfiRS (BSP15) 45082 1832 B93062 PL 11-01-94 FARR LN N 2509 RYDER TRUCK MTNS FAC/OFFICE 45082 1833 B95144 DB 02-20-96 FARR LN N 2509 RYDER TRUCK MTNS FAC/OFFICE 45082 1832 B95144 DB 02-20-96 FARR LN N 2509 RYDER TROCK MTNS FAC/OFFICE 45082 1834 B95194 DB 02-20-96 FARR LN N 2616 ORO WHEAT WHSE WHSE (BSP-15) SPALDING 45082 1835 B93098 CR 07-30-93 FARR S 210 PRING CORP/AA CONST APT 72 UNIT 45202 0731 B95074 H-50 DB 06-28-95 FARWELL MEAD SCHOOL DIST WHSE 36101 B93117 PL 04-12-95 YES ~ FARWELL E 1610 NORTHWOOD MEAL'OWS ELDE'sRELY CARE FAC ( P1688 36092 9027 B93177 CR 09-14-94 FARWELL E 2515 MEAD METHODIST CHURCH ADD-CLASSROOM CHURCH 36044 0803 B94160 PL 10-10-94 ~ FARWELL i 3801 FIRE STATION DIST #9 ADD 36034 0225 B93093 CR 06-16-94 FLIGHT S 1601 U S WEST SUH STATION 2530 B90088 5E 08-22-90 „ fiLINT S 1514 ADD SUPPORT SER 210 X 131 2530 B90003 BT 03-18-92 FLINT S 1514 BOEING EXPANSION (SR2 W 9200) 2530 B91109 BT 03-19-92 FLOR.A N 2217 AF'FORDABLE CUSTOM CABINfiTS ADD 5512 B92040 BT 07-21-93 FLORA N 2521 SPO CO 4512 B70155 BM 03-24-89 FLORA N 2521 SPO CO STG HER.BICIDE FAC 45121 9015 B96011 DB 02-02-96 FLORA N 3014 DELLSN WOOD PRODUCTS ADD-WHSE 55072 0332 B94013 PL 06-06-94 FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WOOD ADD-STORAGE BLDG 55072 0322 B93051 BT 06-29-93 FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WOOD PRODUCTS STORAGE BLDG - 5507 B91001 BT 02-12-92 FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WOOD PRODUCTS OPEN STORAGE 5507 B91033 BT 06-12-91 FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WOOD PRODUCTS STORAGE 5507 B89087 JS 06-13-89 FLORA N 3014 DELLEN WHSE MFG 55072 B70170 JS 06-07-69 FLORA N 3910 WAGSTAFF INC ADD-PRODUCTION ROOM 55063 0173 B94132 PL 08-23-95 YES FLORA N 3910 WAGSTAF'F INDUSTRIAL BLDG - FACTORY OFFICE 5506 B70044 GN 09-11-89 . : _ . ~ ► A ~ , SPOKANE COUNTY ~ HEARING EXAIVIINEIt COMMITTEE FINI)INGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS ANID ORDER INTRODUCTION This matter has come before the Heanng Exanuner Commlttee on July 20, 1995 The members of the Comrruttee present are Frank Yuse, Chair, Verona Southern and Toni Nersesian PROPOSAL The sponsor, The Evangellcal Lutheran Good Samantan Society, requests approval ' of a Zone Reclassification, ZE-20-95, from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) for an existing nursing home/retirement facillty and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, and a Vanance, VE-10-95, from the penmeter landscaping/fencing requuements specified by Section 14 620 365(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code FINDINGS OF FACT ANI) CONCLUSIONS 1 The property is generally located west of and adjacent to Tschuley Road, both north and south of 8th Avenue in Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington 2 The Committee adopts the Planrung Department Report as a part of tlus record 3 The existing land uses in the area mclude an existing retuement apartment building, nursing home, parking, mauitenance building, garages and single farruly residence with garage, single family residences, agncultural and undeveloped 4 The proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area 5 The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Urban (U) and wittun the Aquifer Sensiuve Area (ASA) and the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Overlay zones The Urban (U) category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"city- lilce" environment wtuch includes vanous land uses, a vanety of housing types and densities, and pubLc facilities and services Urban areas will be the most intensely developed of all the categones, primanly residential along with neighborhood commercial, light industnal, and public and recreational facilities The proposed zone reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) is consistent with and implements the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan 6 The proposed zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan 7 The Artenal Road Plan designates Tschirley Road and Eighth Avenue each as Local Access Streets with a future nght-of-way width of 60 feet Implementation of the , . . _ . Artenal Road Plan does not presently require dedicatlon of additionai nght-of-way along either road as a Future Acquisition Area 8 The existing zorung of the property descnbed in the application is Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) previously established as Agncultural (A) zorung in 1957 and redesignated to Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) on January l, 1991 pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zorung Code The proposal does conform to the requirements of the proposed Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone 9 The provisions of RCW 43 21 C(The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with and a Deternunation of Nonsigruficance (DNS) was issued The Committee, after independent review, hereby adopts the DNS 10 The legal requuements for public notice have been fulfilled 11 The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed zone reclassification The opponents testified that approval of the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone would establish a precedent for further similar density zoning in an area of low-density residential zoning, the zone reclassificauon is an inadequate method to bnng non-conforming use into compliance with zoning, and that the zone reclassification is a questionable method to enable granting of building pernuts 12 The applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the onginal zonmg of this area and accordingly, the proposed zone reclassificauon is justified Specifically, changed condiuons include adoption of the Comprehensive plan and more intensive residential use in the area 13 The proposed use will not be detnmental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare especially in hght of the conditions recommended by the reviewing agencies 14 The Committee additionally finds/concludes a Approval of the zone reclassification to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) does not establish a precedent for future land use actions in the area b The subject property does have uruque physical features and special cucumstances which support the proposed vanance from peruneter landscape and fencing requuements COI+tDI'I'IONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPI,IED TO THIS APPROVAL 1 All Conditions imposed by the Heanng Exanuner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant," which tenn shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors-in-interest 2 The Zone Reclassification and following Conditions of Approval apply to the real property described below That portion of Government Lot 2, Section 19, T 25 N, R 45 E, W M lying South of the Plat of Apple Valley Estates 2nd Addition and that portion deeded to James and HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 2 /a a + ~ - t Lenore Wirth dated November 5, 1986, together with the North 609 99 feet of the S W 1/4 of Section 19, T 25 N, R 45 E, W M EXCEPT the East 1335 57 feet thereof, Spokane County, Washington SPO]KANE COU1VTY DIVYSION OF BUILI)ING ANI) PLA1l1NING 1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone and the Aquifer Sensitrve Area (ASA) Overlay zone, as amended 2 Approval requued by the Planrung Director/designee of a specific lightuig and sigrung plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any building pernuts 3 Duect hghting from any extenor area lighting fixture shall not exceed over the property boundary 4 The apphcant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Heanng Body Vanations, when approved by the Planrung Director/designee, may be pernutted, includulg, but not linuted to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the pernutted zone All vanatlons must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be mauntained 5 The Division of Building and Planrung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice notulcr that the property in quesUon is subject to a vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of land use action This Tit1e Notice shall serve as pubLc notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded within the same trme frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows T'he parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on [ imposing a variety of special development conditions. File Il1o. [ ] is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department. 6 The Division of Bt.ulding and Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final dlsposiUOn, including lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Notlce, wluch shall generally provide as follows "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property descnbed herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone) The property which is the subject of tlus notice is more particularly described as follows " 7 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Director/designee shall be subrrutted with a performance bond for the project pnor to release of building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintauned so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 3 8 Applicant must aggregate parcels under one parcel number Aggregation requues a Certificate of ExempUon 9 The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Planrung at the earliest possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administeredlenforced as authonzed by the State Building Code Act Design/development concerns include Addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire hydrant/flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type, occupancy classification, exiting, extenor wall protectron, and energy code regulations (Note The Division of Buildings reserves the nght to confum the actual address at the time of building pernut ) SPOKANE COUNTY DIVgSI0111 OF ENGINEERING 1 No conditions of approval for this request based on the site plan of record SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISIOIII OF UTILITIES 1 A Covenant shall be signed stating The Owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36 94, which petition includes the Owner(s)' property, and further not to object by signing of a protest petition again"st the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36 94 which includes the Owner(s)' propercy PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36 94 2 A wet (Lve) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System is to be constructed Sewer connection pernut is required 3 Applicant is reqwred to sign a Sewer Connection Agreement pnor to issuance of pernut to connect 4 Applicant shall subrrut expressly to Spokane County Utilities Department "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for Public Sewer connections for review and approval by the Utilities Department pnor to issuance of permit to connect 5 Arrangements for payments of additional sewer charges must be made for pnor to issuance of sewer connection pernut 6 The Board of County Commissioners is in the process of evaluating whether Public Sewer should be extended outside the 1 S-year constniction boundary and the terms of connection/extension of public sewer if allowed 7 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 4 ~ i SPOKANE COUIVTY IIEALTH DIST'RIC'T 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Duector of Utilities, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health 4 A pubhc sewer system currently exists for the project Use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authonzed 5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 5 . ORDER The Heanng Exanuner Committee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, APPROVES the application of The EvangeLcal Lutheran Good Samantan Sociery for the Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3 5 (UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) for an existing nursing home/retirement facflity and those uses allowed in the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, and a Vanance from the penmeter landscaping/fencing reqwrements specified by Section 14 620 365(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code as descnbed in the applicatron ZE-20-95/VE-10-95 Motion by Verona Southern Seconded by Toni Nersesian Vote (2-1) TO APPROVE THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AND VA,RIANCE REQUEST HEAR.ING EXA,MIlNER CONEvIITTEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER AND VOTE - - HAIR ` ~ . ._9 ATTE.ST For STACY BJORDAHL Acting PubLc Heanngs Manager 4 By~ HN W P #ZRSON ' Seruor Planner ~ Pursuant to Spokane County regulatrons, any aggrieved party has the nght to appeal ttus wntten decision to the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners within ten (10) calendar days of the signing of this order Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled if you desue to file such an appeal, you must subrtut a wntten appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Commissioners, West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along with a$215 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer If you have any questions, please call the Planrung Department at (509) 456-2205 HEC Order for ZE-20-95 Page 6 • Y ,1 I $ ~ 1 SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING TO SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM CURRENT PLANNING SECTION DATE JANUARY 29, 1997 SUBJECT ZE-20A-95, Change of Conditions to an existmg Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone for the development of a 50 unit multiple family restdential complex I GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Soctety 17121 East 8`h Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 924-6161 Agent Frank Ide, Taylor Engmeering 106 West Mission Avenue, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 328-3371 Contact Planner Francine Shaw Location Generally located south of and adjacent to 8' Avenue and southwest of Tschirley Road in the SW'/4 of Section 19, Township 25 North, Range 45, E W M, Spokane County, Washmgton Proposal Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential-12 zone (ZE-20-95C) for the development of a 50 unrt multiple family residential complex II SITE INFORMATION A Site Size Approximately 18 26 acres Gross Density Approximately 2 7 dwelling units per acre B Comprehensrve Plan 1 I.and Use The subject property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensrve Plan, the Pnority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay (ASA) zone The Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the opportunity for development of a"city-like" environment which mcludes various land uses and intensive residential development Urban areas will have available public water systems, sanitary sewer systems, storm sewer systems and other public facilities This cateszory permits "fill-in" with estab(ished development areas where utilities, arterials, schools and community facilities are existing Residential net densities in this category will range from 1 to 17 units per acre The propsed density of approximately 2 7 dwelling units per acre is withtn the 1/29/97 HE Staff Report for ZE-20A-95C Page 1 ~ suggested density range Since urban areas will be the most intensely developed of all the categories, it is primarily a residentiat category of single-family, two- family (duplexes), and multiple family buiidings along with neighborhood commercial, light mdustrial and public and recreational facilities The more intensive land uses such as light industrial and netghborhood commercial will be located heavily traveled streets, while the least intensive singie-family residenttal uses will be isolated from noise and heavy Vaffic Multiple famity structures will usually be a transitional use located between single family residences and the more intensive areas While this proposal does not provide a transiiion to more intensive uses, it can be considered an expansion of the existing retirement facclity located to the north The proposed change of conditions generally implements the Goals, ObJectives and decision Guidelines of the Urban category 2 Arterial Road Ptan The subJect site is located south of and adjacent to 8" Avenue and southwest of the terminus of Tschirley Road 8th Avenue and Tschirley Roads are designated by the Spokane County Artenal Road Plan as tocal access screets with a planned nght-of-way width of 60 feet 3 County Parks Pian The Spokane County Parks Plan Terrace View Park as County park facility located nearest to the proposal ThLs park is located approxunately two miles south west of the site C Site Characteristics The stte is undeveloped and is currently occupied by an exishng care takers residence and four mamtenance sheds/garages The terrain of the subject site is relatively flat with hills, several seasonal wetlands and areas basalt rock outcroppings Dense trees and shrubs are scattered throughout the srte D Neighborhood Characteristics The proposat is primarily surrounded by vacant, undeveloped lands with an existeng reiUement facility located north of and adjacent to the proposal E Zoning Analysis The existing Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone was established on July 20, 1995 upon the approval of zone reclas"sification request (file no ZE-20-95C) The zone reclassification recognized the existing retirement facility as an use outright allowed withm the Urban Residential-l2 (UR-12) zone whereas the retuement facility was considered a non-conforming use within the previous Urban Residential-3 5(UR- 3 5) zone The appticant has reyuested a change of conditions to the Findings of Fact, Decision and Order issued by the Heanng Examiner Commlttee, specificalty the Division of Building and Plannmg condition of approva( #4 This condition requires the applicant to develop the site m general accordance with the origmal concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee which dtd not include the proposed retirement apartment complex While this proposal does not provide a transition to more mtensive land uses recommended for this zonmg category, ii can be considered an expansion of an existing retirement assisted living facility The proposed change of condihons unplements a majority of the Goals, ObJectives and deciston Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan Proposal Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) established on July 20, 1995 (ZE-20-95C), previously classified as Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) cansistent wrth the Program to Implement the Spokane Counry Zoning Code 1/29/97 HE Staff Report for ZE-20A-95C Page 2 ~ , ~ North Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) established on July 20, 1995 (ZE-20- 95C), previously classified Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) consistent wtth the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code South Suburban Residential-1 (SR-1) established on January 1, 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-286-57) East Suburban Residentlal-1 (SR-1) established on January 1, 1991, previously classified as Agricultural (A) (ZE-286-57) West Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) established on January 1, 1991, previously classtfied as Agricultural (A) (ZE-60-44) F Land Use Analysis AdJacent land uses consist of primarily vacant and undeveloped lands east and south of the proposal To the north is an existing nursing home/retirement facility which is owned by the applicant and is associated with this proposal To the west is vacant undeveloped land also owned by the applicant, who is currently seeking a zone reclassification of this land from Urban Residential-3 5(UR-3 5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) for the development of duplexes (See file no PE-1803-96) Site Caretakers Residence, four maintenance sheds/garages and undeveloped North Nursmg homehetirement facility South Vacant and undeveloped East Vacant and undeveloped West Vacant and undeveloped G Circulation Direct access to the site is provided by 8' Avenue which termmates at the west property Ime of the subject site The site plan mdicates 8' Avenue will be vacated and replaced with a pnvate road Upon vacation of 8' Avenue, an access easement shall be established which connects the site to Tschirley Road allowmg traffic generated by this proposal to cross the parcel located adjacent and north of the site H Design ' 1 Site Plan Data Proposed Site Plan The site plan illustrates a single multiple family shvcture along with four maintenance sheds/garages and an existing caretakers residence Included withm the design of the proposal are six (6)-foot-wide pedestrian pathways, two existing man- made ponds and areas of mamtained and natural landscaping The site plan does illustrate general compliance with the devetopment standards of the exlsting Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone Use 50 Retirement Apartments Proposed Density• 2 7 units/acre Site Coverage 3% Max Structure Height 35 feet 1/29/97 HE Staff Report for ZE-20A-95C Page 3 . ~ Y Buitding Setbacks Proposed Required Front yard 55 feet SS'from centerline of 8th Avenue Side yard 5 feeVstory 45 feet ± Rear yard 15 feet 21 U+ Parking To be determined prior to issuance of any buildmg permit Proposed Buffering and Landscaping Techniques The applicant requested a waiver of tandscaping and fencing requtrements as per Secttons 14 620 365(2) and 14 806 040 pursuant to Section 14 810 200 (Alternate Methods of Compliance) of the Spokane County Zoning Code The Division of Building and Planning has administrahvely approved the applicant's request due to existing vegetation, topographical changes with surroundmg property and the lack of development in the vicinity of the proposal I Density The gross density of approxunately 2 7 dwelling units per acre is consistent with the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone and density range suggested by the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan J Drainage A conceptual drainage plan will be required to be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Division of Engineering and Water Resources prior to the issuance of any buildmg permit K Power Transmission Lines/Other Known Easements• Not applicable L Water Supply The proposal is within the Consolidated Irrigation District however, is located outside the Consolidated Irrigation District corporate boundaries The proposed development requtres Boundary Review Board approval prior to the issuance of any buildmg permit M Sewage Disposal The proposal will be served by a public sewer system as required by the Spokane Regional Health District Use of on-site sewage disposal methods is prohibited N School The proposal ts located within Central Valley School Distnct, No 356 O Fire Protection The proposal is withm Fire District No 1 - P Critical Areas Spokane Critical Areas maps indicate two type IV wetlands and a , geological hazardous area on the subject site The Department of Ecology has mdicated a wetlands report shall be prepared and submitted for their approval prior to the issuance of any buildtng permtt The applicant shall demonstrate compliance with the Spokane Counry Cntical Areas Ordinance Q. Cultural Resources. None have been identified R Transit The proposal is located within the Public Transit Benefit Area (PTBA) The applicant indicates the proposal will be served by private vans and public shuttles III ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the Division of Building and Plannino The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and (aws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan and other County policies and guidelines The Division of Building and Plannmg has determined that "No probable signtfcant adverse impacts" 1/29/97 HE Staff Report for ZE-20A-95C Page 4 . would result from the proposal be►ng developed and has issued a Determination of nonsignificance ("DNS") The "DNS" was ctrculated to 14 other agencies of Jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment The "DNS" comment period ended January 27, 1997 and was advertised 15 catendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adJacent property owners within 400 feet of the subject site, and by notice on a sign posted on the subject site The Hearing Exammer may consider additional environmental related testimony at the public hearmg IV IDIVISIOIY OF BUILDING AND PLANNING SUMMARY AND RECOMNIENDATION The proposed change of conditions generally implements the Goals, ObJectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and is consistent with the development standards of the existing Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone The Division of Building and Planning recommends approval, as conditioned V CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be bindmg on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors 11 The zone change applies to the following real property [ ] SPOKANE COUNTY DMSION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING 1 The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone, as amended 2 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Heanng Examiner Variations, when approved by the Director of the Division of Buildmg and Plannmg/designee, may be permitted, including, but not limited to building location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the original intent of the development plans shall be maintamed 3 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for mamtenance acceptable to the Director of the Division of Building and Planning/designee shall be submitted with a performance . bond for the project or other suitable guarantee prior to release of buildmg permits Landscaping ~ shall be mstalled and maintained so that sight distance at access pomts is not obscured or impaired 4 Approval is required by the Dtvision Directoddesignee of a specific light►ng and s►gning plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permit 5 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary 6 The Division of Building and Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property m question The Title Notice should be recorded withtn the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Building and Planning The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows 1/29/97 HE Staff Report for ZE-20A-95C Page 5 • , 0 The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner or AdmmLstratrve Official on , imposmg a variety of special development conditions File No ZE-20A-95C is availabte for inspection and copying m the Spokane County Drvision of Building and Planning 7 Any division of the subject property for the purposes of creating additional lots/parcels shall be reviewed by the Director of the Division of Buildmg and Planning/designee for compliance with the Spokane County Subdrvision Ordinance and all other applicable local, state and federal ordinances and development regulations, as amended See attached comments and conditions from • Spokane County Drvision of Engineermg and Roads dated January 23, 1997 • Spokane County Division of Utilities dated .Yanuary 20,1997 • Spokane County Water Resources dated December 6, 1996 o Spokane Regional Health District dated January 23,1997 • Boundary Review Board dated August 29, 1996 o Washmgton State Department of Ecology dated January 27, 1997 1/29/97 HE Staff Report for ZE-20A-95C Page 6 1&7 GA-c,. , . ' ` ~~otikaiie~~a1ley,-VGobd~SamarAtan'lIndel3endent,,Liwong:,Facilitv.-~ • Began working on this with fMr Droppers almost a year ago They have done other similar projects • Actually a joint project 50 unit retirement apts and 28 unit retirement duplexes Great additaon to theor exasting congregate care faciBity. • Building, grounds for both projects will be maintained by existing on-site staff , • Working with topography (show site plan) ke'l '0 fp 5*.s 6e-" ! • Have been working closely with the County, Fire Dist, Water Dist since that time • Conducted an informational open house last April • Traffic Study - s xC • Drainage Study • Wetland Study - -f-o w-A~ , i&~_ ~ : , • Are generally agreeable to the recommended conditions of approval a Eighth Ave vacation • Tschirley contribution • Sewer Lagoons • Works well wnth the land, good addition to an exceptional elderly care facility ~ 0 ~ Ov ~ PAGE 1 ,10 31.31 07 JAN 1997 Road# Road Names . MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info . 05865 8TH AV (START) 00 000 HAVANA ST (START) & U 16 PAVED 20 8TH AV 00 120 DEARBORN RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20 00 240 CUSTER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20 00 343 WILLAMETTE U 16 PAVED 20 00 370 CHRONICLE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 00 510 CARNAHAN RD U 16 PAVED 20 00 690 MCKINNON RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20 00 870 WOODLAWN DR (START) U 16 PAVED 20 00 990 FANCHER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20 01 080 6TH AV (START) U 16 PAVED 22 01 120 DICKEY ST (END) U 16 PAVED 22 01 240 EASTERN RD U 16 PAVED 20 01 370 DOLLAR RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 01.510 THIERMAN ST U 16 PAVED 20 Ol 550 ELIZABETH RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 Ol 630 BR.ADLEY RD U 16 PAVED 20 Ol 740 COLEMAN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 01 760 COLEMAN RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20 01 860 G I R.ARD RD ( END ) U 16 PAVE D 20 01 870 G I R.ARD RD ( S TART ) U 16 PAVED 20 02 000 PARK RD U 19 PAVED 32 02.050 EDGERTON RD (END) U 19 PAVED 32 STH AV (END) 02 080 EAST END OF ROAD 05866 8TH AV (START) 00 000 DISHMAN-MICA RD & DI U 16 PAVED 44 8TH AV 00 140 FARR RD U 16 PAVED 44 00 210 SUNDERLAND RD (START U 16 PAVED 36 00 270 WOODRUFF RD U 16 PAVED 36 00 340 WALNUT RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24 00 410 HERALD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24 00 520 FELTS RD U 16 PAVED 24 00 640 R.AYMOND RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24 8TH AVE 00 660 HARMONY RD U 16 PAVED 24 8TH AV 00.710 OBERLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24 00.770 UNIVERSITY RD U 16 PAVED 24 00.920 GLENN RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22 01 040 PIERCE RD U 16 PAVED 22 01 280 BOWDISH RD U 16 PAVED 20 Ol 530 UNION RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 01 660 ROBIE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 01 780 SR 27 (PINES) U 16 PAVED 20 01 920 HOUK RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 01 960 HOUK RD ( STAR.T ) U 16 PAVED 20 01 980 COLLINS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20 02.020 VERCLER RD (START) U 16 PAVED 20 02 050 VERCLER RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 02 130 VIRGINIA ST (START) U 16 PAVED 22 02 180 WOODLAWN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 02.220 MORROW RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22 02 310 MCDONALD RD U 16 PAVED 22 02 430 CLINTON RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 02 560 BLAKE RD (START) U 16 PAVED 30 02 590 BLAKE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 30 02 720 MAMER RD U 16 PAVED 22 02 810 EVERGREEN RD U 16 PAVED 22 02 970 BANNEN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03 030 BEST RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 PAGE 2 " . 10.31 33 07 JAN 1997 Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info 03 090 REES RD (START) U 16 PAVED 22 8TH AVE 03 160 CALVIN ST U 16 PAVED 22 8TH AV 03 220 WARREN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 32 03 320 ADAMS RD U 16 PAVED 22 03 350 MARCUS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03 410 MARIGOLD RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03 470 BURNS RD (END) U 16 PAVED 22 03 570 PROGRESS RD U 16 PAVED 22 03 670 ST CHARLES ST U 16 PAVED 22 8TH AV (END) 03 820 SULLIVAN RD 0 5 8 6 8 8 TH AV ( START ) 00 000 LONG RD ( START ) U 19 GR.AVEL 14 8TH AV 00.500 BARKER RD U 17 LIGHT BITUM. 18 01 010 HODGES RD (STAR.T) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 18 01 210 COLONIAL DR (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 18 01 330 GLENBROOK ST (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 18 8 TH AV ( END ) 01 510 HENRY RD 05867 8TH AV (START) 00 000 WEST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20 8TH AV (END) 00 160 TSCHIRLEY RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20 05869 8TH AV (LIBERTY LAKE 00 000 WEST END TO MCKINZIE R 09 GR.AVEL 12 00 020 MCKINZIE RD (LIBERTY R 09 GRAVEL 12 00 150 GARRY RD (LIBERTY LA R 09 GR.AVEL 18 5 Records Processed , ~ r t SPOH1A1`YJU CORJNTY YHL:JL1RIN`l.3 EXlAlYJ1INYJR In the Matter Concerning ZE-20A-95, Change of ) Condrtions ) NOTICE OF ) PUBLIC HEARING ApPlicant Spokane Valley Good Samaritan ) TO: All interested persons, and property owners and taxpayers witliin 440 feet of proposal, as listed on Spokane County Assessor's records YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE ABOVE- REFERENCED LAND USE APPLICATION, AS SET FORTH BELOW Hcaring I)ate: January 29, 1997 Tirrie: 9 00 a m P➢ace: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, Washington I'roposal: ZE-20A-95, Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential-12 (LJR-12) zone to add 50 multiple family residences to an existing retirement facility Applicant/Owner: Spokane Valley Good Samaritan 17121 E 8"' Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 924-6161 Owner's Designated Contact: Taylor Engineering Frank Ide 106 W Mission, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 328-3371 Locatian: Generally located west of and adjacent to 8'h Avenue and southwest of Tschirley Road in Section 19, Township 25 N, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington Zoning: Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) Compreliensivc Plan: Urban Enveronmenta9 I)etermination (SEPA): A Determination of Nonsignificance has been issued The Division of Building and Planning is the lead agency The official comment period ends January 27, 1997 Rclatcd Permits Not Included Qn Application: None I)ivision of Building & Planning Staff Person: Francine Shaw, Planner 11 509-456-2205 Q7 . ~ ; ♦ r s-,~,~ ~'~,j i Z , PAC/F/C ^ Q Q ` /l 0 ZRD AVENUE Z ZOIV E C ~ W ~ ~ ~a 4TH AVENUH ~ Fz , -r r~ . ~ 2028 ~ J ~ IIMiT OF U OETAI LED - IA STUDY RM71 2028"o ~f ~ f•~t, 2027 X 6TM AVENUE ~ ZOIV E A3 RM70 . LL1 LJJ v~ LO - r2032 ~ - a: ac 2030 J'o r. „ L lrP ~ - -~,fi„ / 8TH AVENUE • ~ Y. ~y..._ ~ ~ ZOiVE C ZC T r I I I - I I I I , ~i ~ . , f~ l)ETERNIINA'I'ION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "I)NS" SPOKANE COUNTY I)IVISION OF BIIILDIIVG AND PLANNING ItESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JAMES L.IVIANSON, DIRECTOR WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11 10 230(3) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE Ng1]VII3ER(S) ZE-20A-95 Il)ESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone to add 50 multiple family residences to an existing retirement facility APPLICANT: Spokane Valley Good Samaritan 17121 E 8''' Avenue Greenacres, WA 99016 (509) 924-6161 Owner's Designated Contact: Taylor Engineering Frank Ide 106 W Mission, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 328-3371 LC)CATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located west of and adjacent to 8"' Avenue and southwest of Tschirley Road in Section 19, Township 25 N, Range 45 EWM, Spokane County, Washington L,EAD AGENCY SPOICANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING DE'g'ERIVIINA'TION Tlle lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a piobable significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43 21 C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checlclist and other information on file with the lead agency This infoTmation is available to the public on request This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency will not act on tliis proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., January 27, 1997, if they are intended to alter ttie I)NS. All comments sliould be sent to the contact person Iisted below. By Francine Shaw Title Planner II Phone (509) 456-2205 Address Spokane County Division of Building and Planning (MS-P) West 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 ~ DATE ISSUED ~`KI Lg , 1997 SIGNA''URE G1~~~,~~r~ COMMCNTS REGARDING CNVIRONMCNTAL CONCERNS ARE WELiCOMC AT TI-1C HEARING AI'PEAY. OI+' THIS DE7'ERIVQINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION Or BUILDING AND PLANNING, (MS-P), 1 st Floor, West 1026 Broadway, Spolcane, WA 99260 The appeal deadline is the same as the above project's appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or ciisapprove the project This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to malce specific factual objections Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal This DNS was mailed to 1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2 Spokane County Division of Engineering, Pat Harper 3 Spolcane County Division of Utilrties, Jim Red 4 Spokane County Healtli District, Steve Holderby 5 Spolcane County Air Pollution Control Authority 6 Spolcane County Division of Parks, Recreation and rair, Wyn Birkenthal 7 Spolcane County Stormwater Utility, Steve Worley 8 Spokane County Boundary Review Board 9 Spokane Regional Transportation Council 10 Spokane Transit Authority 11 WA State Department of Transportation 12 rire Protection District No 1 13 Central Valley School District No 356 14 Consolidated Iriigation District / ,1 . h , . . . , SPOKANE COUNTY DIVESION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING CYIlANGE OF C0NDITIO1V S FO~ ~ PREVJLOUSLH APPROVED ZONE CiYANGE Date Aprii 22, 1996 AppLcation No zE-20-95C Ev. Gutheran Good z,$p~aneT al~eyeG~odBS~maritan Village Name Of Applicant/Representative Mailing Address E. 17121 Eighth Avenue Clty Greenacres State WA ZiP 99016 Phone 924-6161 (work) (Home) Exlsting Zone Classification UR-12 Date Existing Zone Classification Established 1995 Legal Description of Property The north 609.99 feet of the S.W. of .Section 19; T,25N.. R.45E., W.M. EXCEPT the east 1335.57 feet thereof. Area = 18.26 Acres Section 19 Township 25 Range 45 Source of Legal- R. o. s. BooX 62 of Surveys , pag.P R-7A Parcel No 55193 • 9041 PROPOSED CHANGE OF CONNDgT7[ONS Reference specific "Condition(s)" of original approval (Cite the applicable condition from the Findings and Order of the Heanng Exanuner Committee's public hearing) S*Qokane County nivisi on of Rlii 1 c3i na anr3 P1 anni nrr randiticuz Give detailed explanation of request for change in status of the proposal The existing facility is at capacity and there is a demand for retirement apartments in conjunction with the existing facility. If development of the site will be changed substantially by tlus request, or the property has boundaries different than originally proposed, a revised development plan must be subrYVtted r Signature of Applicant or Agent Address different an Apphcant ~ f0o //.IJYi/t Zt&. ~ . s~ ~ ~ ffcxel Rev 1/96, sam t~rS P O 1< ~ N E C O U N T y~.Jtlj ''~:~:~~$~••r'~"' ~b~ ! + DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISlON OF THE PUSLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIP.ECI'OR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., I~~tgr(* 4 IJ91 MEMORANDUM T(): Pat Harper, Spokane County Division of Engineering i im Red, Spokane County Division of Utilities >teve Holderby, Spokane County Health District Wyn Birkenthal, Spokane County Division of Parks & Recreation Bill Hemmings, Stormwater Utility Greg Figg, Department of Transportation Glen Miles, Spokane Regional Transportation Council Christine Fueston, Spokane Transit Authority Susan Winchell, Boundary Review Board Central Valley School District Fire District No. 1 Consoiidated Irrigation District FI20M: Jolltl 1'ederson, Senior Planner 7 ~ DATE: August 12, 199(T , IZE: Change of ConditiL s to an existing Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) zone (ZE-20-95) APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING AUGUST 29,1996 AT 2:15pm DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING ls` FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM Please review the above application and use the attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW MEETING FORM for your comments. The Division of Building and Planning encourages your presence at this meeting. The sponsor and representative have been invited to also attend. If you can not attend, please forward your review comments on the attached form to Louis Webster for the meeting. The attached APPLICATION ACCEPTANCE AND DESIGN REVIEW FORMS will be given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Building and Planning fi1e (so bring three copies to the meeting). Thanks for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Louis Webster of the Division of Building and Planning at 456-2205. c: Frank Ide, 106 W. Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99201 Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village, 17121 E. Eighth Avenue, Greenacres, WA. 99016 Attaciunents: Application Acceptance and Desigll Review Forn1, Project Design, Site Plan 1026 WFST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHMGTON ?,)2(,n Btnt.ouNG PxotvE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 P[_ANNING PNONE: (509) 456-?.?05 • FAx: (509) 456-224" ~ `i'TIT-) , ~ii i , , qlq Design Review for August 29, 1996 at 2 15 p m Change of Conditions for ZE-20-95 Generally located south of and adjacent to 8°i Avenue and southwest of Tsclurley Road in the SW '/4 of Section 19, Townslup 25 N, Range 45, EWM COMPREHENSNE PLAN Urban category and inside the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) PROJECT DESCRIPTION Change of Condrtions to an existuig Urban Residenhal-12 (UR-12) zone to add 50 multiple fanuly residences to an existing retuement facilrty PARCEL NUMBERS 55193 9041 SITE SIZE Approximately 18 26 acres APPLICANT Spokane Valley Good Samantan Village 17121 E 8" Avenue Grreenacres, WA 99016 AGENT Taylor Engineenrig, Inc Frank Ide 106 W Missron Avenue, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 328-3371 ASSIGNED PLANNER Louis Webster, Planner II , , r t yl1 I I " 1 ~ ~ty~{j ~ 1 t f t L 3 ~ . COUNTY DIVUSION OF ~ BUILDING AND FLANNING CIUNGE OF COND!L JL IONS FOR A PREVIOV SLY APPRO'i' JL`iD ZO1V ~ CHANGE Date April 22, 1996 AppJacation No ZE-20-95C Ev. Lutheran Good R~ane~alfeyeGOodBS~ aritan Village Name Of ApphcantlRepresentative Mading Address E. 17121 Eighth Avenue City Greenacres , State WA Zip 99016 Phone 924-6161 (Work) (Home) Existing Zone Classification UR-12 Date Existing Zone Classification Established 1995 , Legal Descnption of property The north 609.99 feet of the S.W. 4 of Section 19. T.25N.. R.45F.. W.M. EXCEPT the east 1335.57 feet thereof. Area = 18.26 Acres Section 19 Township 25 Range 95 Source of Lega1 R. o. s. Book 6z of SUrvey5• PaQP R7A Pazcel No. 55193 • 9041 , 1'ROPOSED CHA1lIGE OF CC)IVDInONS Reference specific "Cond.ition(s)" of onginal approval (Cite the apphcable condition from the Findings and Order of the Heanrig Examtner Comnuttee's public hearing). StQokarie co_t?nty Di vi si on of Rtii 1 c3i na and Pianni nrr (`nnA; nr, #A Give detailed explanation of request for change in status of the proposal 'I'he existing facility is at capacity and there is a demand for retirement apartments in conjunction with the existing facility. , If development of the site will be changed substantially by this request, or the property has boundanes dzfferent than onginally proposed, a revised development plan must be subnutted . r Signature of Applicant or Agent Address different an Apphcant . J~ • i~ /v 6 /.r.t'/ii1641: Rev 1i96, sam . . . 1 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BU--LDING ANL) PLANNING ELd V ~E RECLASSIFI`VA2L IO1 \ APPLICATIV i . PAItT g A. GEIVERAL Ill1I+'ORNIATI0N: Ev. Lutheran Good Samaritan Society DBA/ NAME OF APPLICANT/REPRESENTATNE Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village MAII.,ING ADDRESS E. 17121 Eighth Avenue CITy Greenacres STATE WA ZIp 99016 PHONE 924-6161 (work) (home) IF APPY,YCANT IS 1VOT OWNER, INCLTJDE WRYTTEN 4WNER t1UTHORIZATIQN FOR APPLICAPIT TO SERVE AS gtEPRESEIVTATIVE. LEGAL OWNER'S NAME PHONE MAII.ING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP PROJECTIPROPOSAL SITE AREA (acres or sq ft) 18.26 acres AD7ACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED (acres or sq ft ) Approx e 148 ASSESSOR PARCEL #S QF PROJECT/PROPOSAL 55193.9041 ASSESSOR PARCEL #'S OF ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED 45245.9118, 45241.9115 STREET ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL None assicmed. EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATTON(S) (DATE ESTABLISHED) UR-12, 1995 EXISTIING USE 4F PROPERTY Undeveloped/vacant PROPOSED ZONIlVG Same COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY Urban SCHOOL DISTRICT Central Valley School District FIRE DISTRICT #1 WATER PURVEYOR Consolidated PR4PQSED USE OF PROPERTY Single fauuly dwelLngs Duplexes Mulufanuly dwellings Manufactured homes ( ) Busmess ( ) Industnal ( ) Mixed Use ( ) Other ()o - Descnbe Retirement apartments LIST PREVIOUS PL,ANNING DEPARTIVIENT ACTIONS IIWOLVING THIS PROPERTY Zone change to UR-12; ZE-20-95C B. LEQAVZQNE RECLASSYFICATIOli1 INFOItNYA'TIO1V: LOCATION OF PROPOSAL South of 8th Ave., west of Tschirley Street. SECTION 19 TOWNSHIP 25 RANGE 45 NAME OF PUBLIC ROAD(S) PROVIDING ACCESS Eighth Avenue WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING ON PUBLIC ROAD 1300+/- . , . ~ ZONE RECLASSIFICA'TYON APPLICATION Page 2 of 4 DOES THE PROPOSAL HAVE ACCESS TO AN ARTERIAL OR PLANNED ARTERIA.L YES ~ NO NAME(S) OF ARTERIAL ROADS LEGAL DESCRIMON OF PROPERTY FOR EACH ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PROPOSED N/A , EXISTING ZONE(S) N/A TO PROPOSED ZONE(S)_ FOR THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED ° PROPERTY (ATTACFi LEGAL DESCRI,PT'ION STAMPED BY LAND SURVEYOR OR PROVIDE BELOW N/A , IF YOU DO NOT HOLD TITLE TO THE PROPERTY, WHAT IS YOUR INTEREST IN IT? _ N/A WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIONS 4F THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL W D? Increased demand for retirement/elderly care, public sewer on-site. WHAT IlVIPACT WII.L THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE ADJACENT PROPER'TIES? . Minlmal traffic, may not be visible from ad3acent properties. (See attached) WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATTON? . Comp. plan: provides aiternative housing, adiacent compatibie uses. (See attached) WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSE T4 MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSAL'S IMPACT ON .'1iJ~1~:vU~1~1~JJ1T Ll1Z~l UJt'.' Abundant landscaping, architectural quality. (See attached) . ~ • ~ v- ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION APPLICATION Page 3 of 4 PART II THIS SECTTON OF THE APPLICATION WII.L PROVIDE THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF WITH WMTTEN VERIFTCATION THAT TFE APPLICANT HAS HAD PRELRAINARY CONSULTATION WITH THE AGENCIES IDENTIFIED RESULTS OF'THE PRELIMINARY CONSULTATION SHALL BE INCOR.PORATED IN THE PROPOSAL BEFORE FINAL SUBMITTAL TO THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIRE MARSHALY./FIRE DISTRICT ~ A THIS PROFOSAL IS WITHIN FIRE PROTECITON D~ CT NO ~ B ADEQUATE A►RRANGEMENTS (HAVE) (~~1.YF.N~T~~ BEEN MA.DE TO MEET OUR NEEDS IN PRQVIDING FOR AN ADEQUATE WATER SYSTEM ANB FACILITIES FOR FII2E PROTECTION PURP4SES C RECOMMENDED FIRE FLOW OR UNABLE TO CALCULATE NOW , BECAUSE USE IS NOT DEFINTTIVE, AND WII.L BE DETERMINED AT BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATTON TIME ~D REQUIREMLNTS INCLUDE 4, ~',h, ~C- Va Il ey P7. az' ~ FIRE DISTRICT ~ SIGNATURE/TZTtE DATE WATER PURVEYOR ~ A. SATTSFACTORY A►RRANGEMENTS F TIC WATER AND FIRE FLOW REQUIRENiENTS (HAVE) (HAVE NOT BEEN MADE B REQUIRENiENTS/COMMENTS CVPAO G W44 Zv'r`. (1 1v/?8 A -10 WATER DISTRICT SIGNA E ~ DATE COUNTx E11TGINEER ' A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ROADS AND DR.AINAGE HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED WITH'THE APPLICANT A COMMENTS j -Lag - T-- bCOUNTY vTILYTIES ~ A PRELIIvIINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (HAVE) (FiAVE NOT) BEEN SATISFIED THE DESIGNATED WATER PURVEYOR FOR THIS SITE jS Zo"*n l,d A 4 -e ~ A COMMENTS j~ 512- ICI ~ ~SIGNATURE/TTTLE DATE HEALTH DISTRICT ~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN Pj(HAVE RAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMITTAL OF THIS PROPOSAL (I3A`VE) NOT BEEN SATISFIED A COMMENTS 4~ -2), ~ SIGNATUR.FJI'I'!'LE ATE SEVVER PURVEYOR ~ A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKFN PLACE AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SEWER ARE UNDERSTOOD BY T'HE APPLICANT A COMMENTS Co N rj P c. f 4O SIGNATURFIrITLE DATE • ~ Z4NE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION Page 4 of 4 RT't IYI RiFICATION I, THE UNDERSIGNED, A LICE IE OR, HAVE COMPLETED THE INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR'THE ZONIlVb, GAL DESCRIP'I'ION o•.,~ ~ ,,,--8 G~',~ SIGNED DATE . ~ ~'3 ADDRESS PHONE ~ ZIP PART IV (SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR OR A►FFIRM UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFCJLLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FUR1'HER SWEAR OR A►FFIItM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROP4SED FQR THE PREVIOUSLY IDBNTTFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS V'irRITTEN PERMISSION FRQM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HISIHER BEHALF N~ The Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Dp~ y July 8, 1996 ADDRESS 4800 W 57th Street , PH4NE 605 -362-3100 Sioux Falls, SD ZIP 57117-5038 July 8, 1996 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR REPnSENTATNE DATE Vice President for Operations State of South Dakota County of 1Vbnnehaha , Subscribed and sworn to before me ttus 8th day of July 1996) by Bonnie Brown . +~j~.seyqCPOejfejod:ooA - C L ELOYE A. FARRELL ~ ~ ~~►~.v ~ ~ ~ S v NOTARY PUBIIC rY Public SE~~ l~~ta s S~~ S01JTH DAKOTAwVW s + My comrrussion expires 9-5-03 . • . . , , . t Y Y l ~ [11 Spolmne Valley Good Samaritan Village (bange of Cbrditians to 2E-20-95c SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 T1T , . RCCEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY SC~ 3 0 1996 DIVISlON Ofi BUII:OIIVG AIVO,wLANMiNq f3Y , , 'rPOKf,HE ENYIROHHEN'AL 02DIMINCE (V/.C 197-11-9601 Sectton 11.10.210(l) Envlronmental Checklist Ftle No. ZF-'-l~ Purpose o( Checklist: The State fnrirormental Po11cy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C aC1t, requtres all govermxnta? agenttes to tonslder the envirorxnenta) 1trpacts of a proposal before meking Atcisions. An Environmental Impatt Statement (E15) must be prepared for all proposals with probable slgntficant adverse 1rapacts on the qua11tY of the envlrortment. The purpose of this checklist is to provlde lnformatlan to help you and the agency 1Centify 1mpacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avold 1rt+pacis from the proposal, 1! 1t can be donel and to help tht agency dcctde xhether an E15 is requtred. lnitrutttons for Appliu nts: Thts environr.ental checklist asks you to describe sone bastc informatlon abaut your proposal. Governmental agencles use thls checklist to Eecerrnlne whether the enrironmental impaccs of your proposil are si9n1f1can[, requlrtng prepara[ion of an E1S. Ansver the Ques[ions brltfly, xlth the most precise tnfornation knawn, or glve the best descr{ptlon you csn. You nust ♦nsver each Question accuratc:j :9,G to the best of your knovledge. ln most cases. you should De sble to answer tht questSons fron your own observatlons or pro,yect plans wlthout tfie need to hire experis. If you really do not knor the answer, or tf a questton does not aDVlY to your proposal, wrlte 'do no[ knaw' or 'does not epply.' Cornplete anzwers to the questtons nar way •vold unnecessary Aelays lattr. Soae ques[tons ask ab wt governa+ental re9ulatfons, such as zonfng, shorelinc, and lindmsrlc deslynations. Answer these questlons 1t you cin. lf you hive problens, the gorermx ncal agencles can aszist you. The checklist questtons apply to ill parts of your proposal, even tt you plan to do thni over a period of timt or on dtfferent pirctls of land. Attach any addStional informatton that wlll descrtbe your proposal or tts environrtental effects, The agency [o whlch you submlt this checklist may ask rou to ezplaln your ansMers or provlde addltional tnfonm tion reesonably related to dete mining if there may be slgnlflcant idverze 1mpatt. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals. even though questtons aa+y be ansxered 'does not •pply'. IM ADDITTOH. ca+plete che SUPPIEHENTAL SNEET FOR NO!iPROJEtT ACTIOHS(Psrt D). For nonpro,}ect acttonz. the references in the checklist to the wordz 'project.0 "applicint,' and 'property or site' sAould be r a E is 'proQos+l.' 'proposer.' and 'iffecteC geographtt arta,' respectlvely. A. BACKGROUND 1. tlane of propostE projett. 1f appllCable: SrXokanR Vallev Good Samaritan Retirement Apartmentst Ev. ' 2. %a.e ar ApQiicanc: _ Sn~ane Vallev Good Samaritan Villaqe ' 3. Ilddress and phone nunber of applltant or contact person: -p 17191 F~hth Avenue, Greenaeres, WA 99016 4. Otte checklist prepireC: ,Tl]t1P_ 19 , 1996 s. AgencY requesting cl+etkllst: Snokane Countv Division of Building and Planning. 6. Proposed ttning or schedule (lncluding phasing, 1f ippllcaDle): ronS r i.i on of Anartments : 1998 ~ 7. A. Oo you have any plans for future addlctons, ezpAniton. or iurther actlrlty related to or com ected vith this oroposit? If yes. explatn. Thi s prniert- wi v_ntual ly Connect to the existincr facilitv and retirement dunlexes vi~ conimon around. b. Do you own or have optlons on land nearby or adjacent to thls proposil? If )^es, explitn. Yes. Applicant owns approximately 170 acres adjacent to the proiect site. R. llst tny enYlronmental lnfocrAtlon you knor about thit ha: b a rt prepired, or Ktll be prepared, dtrectly relited to thls proposal, SEPA checklist and aq~ociated information for ZE-20-95c and for , rPticement duDlexes to tre West. i•11'. '~~~~1~ (('~Li1 ~ C{.`c.. t. ' ~ • (~hn, ~ /'-~i Rev.2/1/88 - t , -i . , srL1,'jurc, crrviROtrtQrrcu.3o"dt;n►icE. (vAC 197-11-960) Scctloc 11.10.230(1) ~ t ~ A. MCXG40Ut7D (con[icucd) y, po you ymov vhccher apQllca[lonA are pcodlng toc governscncal •pprovals o( o[her proposal• dlrccclr •((ec[ln; the propercy covared Dy rour proposal' I[ res, erpl&la. NQne kC10Wi1. 10. Llst aoy goveromeat appcovals or pccnits that v1L1 Se needed [or your pcoposa.1, 1I 1mow►. 1)1)rn.ra1 nf Man7e af rondi ti ons, enaineering drawinas , anplicable construction and buildinq permits, approval of Boundary Review Board for extension of waterline outside the current district boundaries, approval of 8th Avenue street vacation. . 11. GLve a bcict, caaplete descciptlon oE rour propo ul, including tlx proposed uses and thc sise of ctx projett and slte. :hece ace •eversl queatloai L[er la this checlcliec ttut ask you to describe certaln aspect■ of rour pcoposal. Y w do no[ need to repeat thott ansver■ on Chis page. ehancxe of conditions to a11ow construction of a 50-unit retirement anartment and associated improvements on 18.26 acres. 12. LoCacioo o[ t}x pcoposal. Gtve ■u(Elclcnc ln[orsAtlon toc a pecson to undcts[and the precisc loucton of yout yroposed ytoSect, itKludln= s strect •ddress. 1( aoy, and sectlon, cov►u hip •od [anae, if knovn. It ■ pcopo u 1 vovld occur ove[ a rante.o( area, provide the ran=e or bouadariei o[ Che s1[eW. Provtde a legsl deatclption, •i[e plan, vitlnlty " p, and topotraphlt s.ap, 1( rea•on.blr •valL Ole. Vhile rou shovld auDoit any plAui requlred by the •;cncr, you are not reQulred co duplLcatc saps or detalled pl.ans suboltted vith •nr pecalt •pplicatlon celiced cc chis checklisc. South of Eiqhth Avenue, West of Tschirley'Road, Greenacres . Washinaton. (Sec.19-25-45). 13. Doe• the ytoposed atilon lle vithin the AQuifer SenAltlve Atca (ASA)' :hc Ceneral Sevct Secvice Arca* ihe PTIOTICr Sevet SaTVice ATCa? :he C1cr o[ Spolc.ane' (See: Spolcane County's ASA Overlay Zone ACLs lo[ boundarier). ASA, GSSA, PSSA. :'O EL COKPLL:'LD bT APYLICA2fC B. L2(VIRO1CWM'.1L II.[?QXCS Evalua[lon Fot Aaencr u.e onir 1. EwA:TI Genecal desc[lp[lon ot the slte (clrcle ooe): ( L c,~olling,i h111Y, steap slopes, mountatnw s, othec: ~ f b. Mhac 1s the acecPcst sloPe on thc slcc (aPProxiaate Pecccnt AloPe)' • 30% ~ C. 'lhat geoeral t7Pca o( rolle ars found oo the ai[e (for enaaple, clar, taod, tcavel, pea[, ■uck)' ` ~ I[ you Imov che classlflcacion of a6rlcultutal •oils, speci(r the■ aod note •ny prire tar~land. i~ r)1l ~ J~. 1.~~C%'- I` s~~(, sr. ♦ ~ J d. Arc there •urface iodlcatlooA or hiscorr o( unwtablc soil• in tAe taaediate vicini:rt If describe. {VU 2 . . , . ~ . SPOKANE ENYIROMNEH7AL OROINANCE (UAC 197•11-960) Sectton 11.10.230(1) S. ENYIROtC1EHTAL ELfMEHTS(tontinucd) Eviluatlon For Agency Use On1Y e. Oescrlbe the purpose, typc, and approxtmate quantlties of any f1111ng or gradlng proposed. InQicete source of ftll. rradingto create a buildina nad and install utilities. Fi11 material will be f rom local sources. f, Could eroslon ocxur as a result of clearing, constructlon, or use? If so, generally descrlbe. _-M1.i10r W1T1d E'rOS].OTl durina construction. g. About uhat percent of thc slte w111 be covered vlth lmpervlous surfaces after project construc- tlon (for example, esphalt or buildingi)? Ap r~ oximatelv 109a, includinc~ roads, buildings, driveways, parking lots, etc. h. Proposed measuref to reduce or control eroslon. or other impacts to the eartA, 1i any: Waterinq to keep dust to a minimum. Re-vegetating al1 disturbed areas. a. Llhat type of emissions to [he air would result fron the proposal (t.e., dust, wtaaobile, odors \ , , lndustrlal. wood smoke) durlny constructlon and when the pro}ect is tompleted? If any, j(,~1.~~r~~ generally describe and give ipproximate qwntites if known. 1 Vehicular emissions. • ~ ~h ~ . l ~C C . b. Are there any off-site sources of erntsslons or odor thit may atfect your proposal? If so, 9ener+lly descrlDe. . IVO c. Proposed measures to reduce or controt emtsslons or other tnpacts to a1r, If any: ir J~. --p-aved road surfaces , , 17A , ~ 3. uaTEa a. Surftce: ' (1) ls there any surface viter body on or in the tur.edtate vltinlty of the slte Includfng year- round and seaional ttreams, saltwitcr, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type anG provlde names. [f approprlate, state whtt strean+ or rlver 1t (lows 1nco. Th_ ar two man-made, lined, abandoned sewer lagoons. (2) 11411 tAe project requlre any wrk over. 1n, or adjatent tu (vithfn 200 ( at) the destrlbed vaters? lf yes, please describe and attach aratlable plans. YP_SA, SPP Sl_fiP Dla11. . . _ . , , . : (51AC 191-11-5bu) Secclor, 11.10.:36(1) l. C?tVIRONFRNTLL ii.iJQZf:S (COntlaued) ~ ► Ev~l~atlon F~r Agenc]. Ufe Onl w ( 7) Estisata the •mouot ot I111 •nE dredge u&cerial t1+at vould De pLeed ln or rewved Irou the suc(ace vacsr or veclands •ad lndiejite the acea o( tAe sice that vwld be •(fecced. lodtcate the •ource oI (111 mateclal. None. (G) Vtll the proposal require ■urtu• wter vithdraval• or diversloru' Glw • general deserlp- tlon, purpose, •nd approxiaa[e Quantitias, lf tnovn. No. (S) Doas thc proposal lle vithln • 100-yur Ilaod pLa1n! I[ •o, aot• loution on [M slte pLn. Nv t (S) Dw s the propoaal lnvolve •ny dlechacQes of vu t• aacerlal• to surlaee vacer$! If go, descrlDs the trpe of v4sta and an[iclpated volume oI discAar=e. No. b. Ground: (1) Vtll groundvater De vtthdravn, or vlll wstst be dischacged to groundvatsr' Ctve =eneral descrlptlon, purpose, •nd •pproaliu te Quancltles, 1! Imorn. No. Desertbe vast• a&terlal that vl11 be dlsclu rged 1nCo cl+e {round Lrom •eptlc tanke or ocl+ec •anitarp vast• trsa ueot tatlllty. Descrlbe the general s1g• of tAe srst s, the ntap+r ot houses co be •erved (!f ♦pplicabls) or the nuaber of persona the srsces(s) •re •:pected to serve. None. Describc any •rscema, o[har thun tAose daslgasd !or t1w Aispo ul o( santtary vaste, lntcalled tor the purpose ot dlscharglag Ilulds b+lov the grw od •urLace (lntlude• •ys[bs such •s thooe for the diepo N1 0( stote vacir or draiaag• from [loor dcalns). Dsscribe the t7pe ot •yeces, the amount oi saterial co be d1sposed ot tArough [Iw sysch and t M t7pes ot macerlal• ltkely co be dlspooed o! (lncludint aatarials vhlch aAy ea[ar tAe s7rstm loaidverteotly through @plll@ oc •s a result of tire[ightlot attivlCLes). Drywells may be used for discharging stormwater. Geotechnical tests will be performed to determine suitabilitv. (4) 4111 •ny chsical• (especlally or`enic solveo[• or pstroliua tucls) be otored la •bove- grouad or uodetground stora`e taulcs' I( so, vdc c7Pcs and quantitles of aatar1a1s vtll be sLO[ed' No. 4 • • 3?OTJUtt CTiYIROlR~NTfCL ORD'I~lA2t~E (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) 1. L1tVIRO1RQ11TAL LLL1{LtT'S (conttnued) Ivaluation Tor 1lacncY Uge Only (S) What protectivc oe u u[es vlll De cakca Co insu[e ctuc lu ks oc spllls o[ anr chesl u 1• • stored or used on slte will not be •lloved [o percolate to `roundvatcr (this includes eeasu[es to kcep thealcal• ou[ ot disposal •ys[ess described ln 3b(2) •oA 3b(3)1 N/A c. Vatcr P.unolE (lntludins storn vaccc): (1) Desc[lbe the souree o[ runo!( (lncludiog stoca water) •nd ret.'iod of collecclon •nd dtsposal 1I sny (Snclude quantltLes, 1[ knovn). Nhere vlll Chis %ater Ilov' 1r111 tR1s wcer Llov lnto othcC w ters7 If •o, dcscribe. StQMwater will be routed via curbing and grading to d_t.Pnti on p2nds and discharQed to natural drainage way-q_ nr 3jPi is wi t 1 he util_i zed where appropriate. (2) :7lll any cReaicala be *toccd, handlcd or used on thc slte ln a locacion vhece •sp111 0r leak vlll drain co sur(ace or troundvater oC to ••toto vatet dlsposal srstm dischactln6 to •u[(ate or tcoundvstett No Could vascc aatcrial■ encer ground o[ •urtace %atecsT II so, Qenerally descripe. Nn d. Proposed neasurcs co reduce or eontrol ouctace, `round, and rvno([ vater topacts, (t •ny (1( t the proposed •c[Lou lies vitkin tht AquLtec Sens![ive Area IDe sspeeially clsat on erpLanationa r cclacLng to [•cllitles concerniog Section• 3b(4), )b(S), •nd 3c(2) o( [his checklist): nrain ~nP wili he collected and treated per Spokane Cn»ntv c;Li delines for Stormwater Management. 4. PL.A-VTi a. 'Teck or citcle type of vcaeca[!on [ound on the St[c: _-X- deciduous tree: alder, aaplc, a~pen. ther . X cvcrsreen crse: [Lc cedar, Snc o[he[. ^ X shtuDs. X sr.... Natural and Turf pascure. crop ot (Caln. vet soil plancs, catrail, DuctcTCUp, Duil[ush, skuak csbbage, o[hcr. vater plants: y tec lllly, ccltrage. Rlltoil, otRer. X ocher types oi veSe[atlon. • b. LIhaC kled and •aount oI ve6e[atloo vlll ee seaoved oc altered! Primarily natural grasses and a few pine trees. . • _ ~ ~ ~'l~ /1 ~ L,l1, ~ l c. Llsc chreacened or endan;ered speeias lenovn to be on or near the site. NonP irnnwn d. Proposed landsuping, us• oI aatLva PLa[s. or othe[ seasures to PTlet[Vt or enhanee vege[aClop L~L .~<<, ~r of as manv plne trees as possibl ~ , r: PreservatiQn o~ ~ Extensive ornamental landscapinq in common areas. J / IL.~ s SPOKAKE EIIYIROKHEHTAL OROIHIINtE ' (1lAC 197-11-960) Settion 11.10.230(1) 8. ENY1ROriNENTAL ELEMEKTS (continued) Evaluatlon For Agen[y Ust Only 5. ANiMALS A. Ctrcle any birds and animals whtch hnve been oDserveA on or near the slte or are knarn to be on or near the site: btrds: heuk, heron, eagle, songbirds other' j]t")l d cl,amP birdS. msmnals: deer bear, elk beaver, (Other) smal 1 P_Y' aTllit131S native t0 area. fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: oCher: . D. llst any threetened or endangered specles kn w n to be on or near tfie S1te. NQne known c. Is the site part of a migratton route? 1f so, ezplatn. No d. Proposed neasures to preserve or enhance v{1d11fe, 1f any: Preservation of much of the existing veqetation. Ornam _n .a1 landscatainq. 5. EttERGY AHD NATUaAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of enerqy (electrlt, naturil qas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the the comple[ed project's energy needs? Oescrlbe xhether tt wtll be used for heating, manufac- turing, eic. , Electricitv and natural qas will be used for all p Pray nP .ds _ b. 4tould your project sffect the potential use of solar energy by aEjacent properttes? If so. generally describe. No C. What kinds of ener9Y conservition features are 1ncluEed 1n the plans of tA1s proposal? List other propcsed measures Lo reduce or control ertergy impaccs, tf any: Those snecified in the U.B.C. 7. EHYIRONHEhTAL HEAL7H ~ a, Are there any envlronmental health hazards, intludtng exposure to tozit cherntcals, risk of flre • and explosion. sp111, or Razardous waste, tAat could octur as • result of thls proposal? If so, describe. ~ (1) Describe speciil emergency servlces that mt9ht be requlreE. None relative to environmental health. . 6 ~ ~ ~ { fF • SPt}I:AH° Y.`FNIkUImHT~►.L t3RDiNA1qCt ' {t7tiC 191-1]-460) SecEion 11.10.730{l} 3, CWLRpTdF€LtsT/WL,rLEHENTS (continued) Lv+cluatian Far Agetiey klse Ualy E11VIRpN.4E1t:K1., HEAl..-}i (conCinued) (2) Proposed mcstures ta iedute or conCroi •.r'.lronmtncal hcalch ha:ards, lf anr: N/A (1) Vtnat typee af neise exiit isr the area uhieh e.ap •liecc your pra}ect (tor exAtip4e: ittLLiC. :qL,igment, oyer■cion, oEher' Nnne ather thart minor vehicular traffic. {2) Vhsc [ypes and levelc of noire would be creatcd by ac uaocia[€d vith the prajeet on a short-[ecn or a long-term basls (inr eacawple; clCafilc, corAirutCion, operatLon, oihet)? Indieate wha[ houre raoisc rrauld case from the rLte. L,oncr term: Vehieular traffic. Slaort term: Vehicular traffic from the constructian r ecxuipment, noises. (3) Propomed ae+suce Cc t'e3uce er eonLrol nolse 1exyaets, L( •ny; Limit canstruction to dayliqht hours. 6. Ul'.fiCt AN[1 SHCIRELIlIE U5E A. ►Jhac tc the eurrent ust of the al[e and ■dyac<n[ properties! Undeveloned, with existing maintenance shed. . L. 1irs the slEa bcsn uacd for agrlculEure' if ■o, deseribe. '.VCJ C. Peseribc any strutCUres on [he si[e. Maintenance shed, which will be reiocated. d. Vill any sCruceures be desakl,rfied? If •o, which*. NQ C. Slhat ia che currenc xonlna tlasslfica[lon of the iite1 URrl2 - t . f. Vhhat 1n the LUCFCLSC <drspceheaaive plan desitna[ton af the mite'! . Urban g. If ipplieable, r+hrC is the turren[ shoreline +Yaster prograr deritnaCion af the s1EeT N! A h. iiat Rar qrrt of the site brea c1186Lf ted aS an "ensirauaenea,],iy san,altirrs" artaT Ii so. .peelfy. No 4. Approxiau[e1y hov manr people wauld tsslde ac vork in the toapleCsd prayettt e wauld reside in the completed pra j ect . ► e SPUfJINL tNVIlOliMtrilL ORDIKANCL (VAC 19]-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) D. [NVIA014QN7AL tl_L`QKTS (eontloued) !valuatlon For kgancy u.e oOAr J. Appcoxiaately hov u ny people would the coapleted projceE dlsp Lce' k. Proposed .casures to •vold o[ reduee dtsplac ment lmpacts, 1f •oy: rT/A 1. Propoeed ■easurem to ensure the proposal 1o cospatible vlth existloa and prajected L nd useo and plans, if •ny: The nroiect is situated adiacent to an existinq retirement nursing facility and would be owned and _manaaed by the same . s. Houstac A. Approxiaately hov u nr unLts would Ee provlded, 1[ •nri Indicate vhether hlgT-. slddlc-, oc lowlncooe housine. f 50 r ti m _n . anartmentG. _ b. Approxio+tcly ►w vmany uotts, if •ny, would De elialnatedT Indlute vhetTur hish-, ■iddle-, or ' lov-Lncove Rouslng. None c. Proposed neisurcis [o reduce or contcol houslns Smpacts, if any: N/A 10. AESTIIETICS a. Khat 1s che tallesc hei=ht o[ •nr proporad scructutre(e). uot lncludlnr, antermaet Ntut 1s [he princlpal excerior buildina %acerial(r) proposed* The apartments will be two stories, approximately 30 feet tall. b. trhat vLev• !n the !m cdiate vicinltr would Ee alteted or obs[tvctedl None c. ►royoscd .easures to Tedutc or tontrol &es[hstlc lmpacts. 1f •nr: The apartments will not be visible from adjacent properties . 11. LICH: A.vn cuxL ' S. 'lhat type oI liaht or glare v111 che propoaAl producet 'Ifut [ine o( dar vould !t aainlr occu[1 Residential scale lighting during evening hours. b. Could 116ht or j Lrc Lroa Che fioished pco}ecc ba a satetr lu:ard or ln[erfece viCA view t NO" c. ut+at exlsclne of(-site sourees o( liSht or gLre aay afteec rour pcopoiial! one • E. ?copooed •easures to reduce or cootrol lljht and j1aCC lapac[s, 1( aer: • Residenti.al liqhtinq directed downward. • sror.~.xL rxviROrrtzt~t. JantKAa'tZ (VAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) D. LNVIAOtdMAL LLJMNTS (con[Lnucd) Cvaluatlon Foi Asency Usc On17 12. ALCAE AT IOti Vliac dealgn.ted •nd ln(o nul recrcatlonAl oppoC[uni[1es •re in the laacdia[e vi[1n1LyT Hikinq, bicycling b, uould the proposed proSecc dlap L ce an7 exlacing reccu tlonal usee' I[ to, descrlbe. Nn - c. Proposed seasurcs to ceduce or cont[ol lepacts on recreatlon, lncludtng recriatloiul opportuni- ciea to be provlded by the pcojec[ or appltc.nc, 1I any: ways for wallnq, common areas and natural terrain f nr rPrrPa t- ' nn - 13. HIS70RIC AND CUi.TU1W. ?RESERVATION a. Arc there any qlaces or opjccts lioted oe or proposcd [or naclonal, stace or local preserva- • tion cegilcers knovn Eo be on or neX[ to the sSte? i[ so, ecnerall/ describe. None known b. Ceneraily deseribe •ny L ndmatk• ot evidcnce oI Alscoric •tchaeolo`tcal. scicn[lU c or cultucal laportance Icnown [o be on or nexc to the slcc. None known . c. 4roposed reisureo to redute or control lspatcs, if •ny: N/A ta. zr,AusPOR-nTtoll a. Identl[y publlc streets and hiihvars servins the slte and descrlDe pTOposcd access [o the extscing streec srstea. Shov-oo s1[e p1ana, LI any. Eiahtr AvPnuP is presently a local access street but will be vacated. b. Ia sLce curren[ly rerved b publif traos,itf I[ aoc, whac 1s tM •pproziaace dletanee to the neares[ tr.n,zt .ta9t 'ie site is served by private vans and pubtic shuttl_es. C. tlov ■anr parkint spaces vould the toopletsd projsct have! tbv aaeq vould the project elld nuce? . 'I7ie anartments would contain ap.proximatelv 75 spaces. d. Vill :eQulre •nr oev cwds or •t[eats, or improvereots to exis[ing road& or •traeto not lacludiai drivevays2 I( so, teeeca117 desc[Lbe (lodlcate vhetAet puL1Lc or prtvatc). Sidewalks and curbinq will be installed.within the pa-rking lots and on-site. e. uill the pCojecC use (or oeeur in the Ssaadiate rieloSt7 of) w[ar, tail, or •ir trsaspor[aeionl I[ •o, generally QemcT1Le. No 9 , STORAlfE QfPIt0lodNTk1. OIDINU+cY. . ~ ~ • ~ , (WAC 197-11-960) S+ctioo 11.10.230(1) ' ' - . i 1. L7RT P.0!!iL]r-AL LLIIMZIITS ( c o ct1 owd ) !.~:uaCion Fc' l.a~oc7 U~• Oclr II I }lov vny vvhlculAt [rlps per Aay vw?d b< Renera;e! br ttu ccampla[e,: pcc)ect'. :f knovn, I tndicatc vMo puk vould occuc. ~ SPe t affic st~udv. g. Proposed oaamure• to reduce or eontrol trmnsportattoa ispaets, 1! •oy: ' Retirement housinq produces fewer peak-houl vehicular trips than standard residential housing. is. ruBLtc scavtces A. 'Jould tt+d prnject result in ao locruood oMd !or public servtee• (for e=arylo, (ir• psoteetion, polic• protectlon, health caTe. •chools, ot!►er)t 1l •o, generally describa. Typical increases in needs for uolice and fire protection. Many health services will be provided by existing facilities. There will be no increased demand on schools. b. Propoead ou sure• to reduc• or cootTOl direet lapseta oa puDlie serviees. 1! •ny: The existinq facilitY has health care professionals on staff. Fire hvdrants will be installed. 16. L:ILi:IES a. Ctr e otlll curren i L D1• •c the 9it4: 4:11-ttlclt XX.-.1.ural j u v.ter c~lu• ervice e eplwn• •alcar7 mover, @ep[Sc srscK, otMr. E. Denctibe the utilltles tfut •r• proposed foc tM1a proJecc, the utillt) provldlng the servic• •nd the gencral conscsuccioo teclvltl4ko oo the site or ln tfr lnurdtats rlclnicr vhlth dghc De neaded. All utilities circled above will require extension/ connection throuqhout the site. c . s u►u►TVu 1, the undersl6ned, irvu r uoder the peN 1[y of perjury [hat the aDove caspooses ace tid• ttvthlully and to the bdac o( s7 knwledge. 1•lso underecand ch.c, a`+ould cM ce b• aoy vtlllul alsrapreseecacioo or vllltul Lct of lu11 diselosura op my part, C1+e ••n a+y vltAdrav •nY o dcceriLi N clon o( nonsigniticaoce that lt a1ghC lssue ia rsllsoc• u chi ckr kllec. ~v. Lut~eran Good Samaritan Society DBA/ Julv 26 1996 PT nc Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village o.ce: (P1oY • PTLAC Of T)9t) ~ Proponent: AAdreN E 17121 8th Avenue ' V ice Pr4~f21~ foz operat iorls p~oR~ : Spokane, WA 99216 Pecson comp etiog fors: [~ace: Phone: (509) 328-337. ~ roR sTLrr ost oHi.t Su![ ■aber(s) revlevtos cl+ecklisc: / Eased on t41o'scait reviev o[ the soviron"ntal eheckllst •eri otlrr pertloeoc icfociutlon, the stat.' : A. Coaclude@ that [here ace no probabl• slgalfluo[ •dverse lapaccs aad recooeods s detecrioacioo of uonrigni!:caoce. B. Coaclude@ [hac proE&ble otgnlficant •dvecst anv-irnnmotal lnpatto do ezis[ tor the cucTent proposal •od tacooaeods •■itlga[ed dater- eloAtlon ot aoastgailLcanc• vith cooditioaa. C. Coacludes thac there ar• probable signi(lu at •dvacse •ori mw ncal lapact• •ad reeowAwods a doteruloatioo oI signi[icaocs. TILIIIC TS - =75.00 10 . . ~ . ~ ' ~I i 'J.r~ L,'f 4'Vl p f 14 M f T k ~ J-- (cTjlE(cxiLj31pj ~ SUPPLLMLYfAl, CIIL1CKIJISrl' FOI'k' NON-PRO,TrrT :~(-'Tl0N'lS C'1IANGF, OF SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11,10.230 [11 ~ ~ r ~ a j ~ sporX,'E t'fVIP.OtMNTAT, p3tDINANCE :D EE COHPI.E±'ED EY APPLiCANT EvsYuatlon Far Agsncy Use 4nly D. 5UPPLEIiEh'TAl. 5i[EE:' FOA NQYiPR(l7ECT ACTIOf75 (Do tsot use thic sheet for projec[ •cziov+c.} P.lCatliC shere queatlonc are very genaral, it may he helpful to read them Sn conjuncCivo vith t'tie lict oF elements iof tr,e envtrcnment. `lhen snevering thcse queatinns, be avare cf the extent the praposal, or the typee af sttivi[iea likely [o reau:E from the proposal, ►+ould affeet th: Atem as a grracer isecenalcy or ac a faater rate [Ysan if the propocal vere nv[ faplementeri. Reipond brieilp and in geaera2 termf. 1. Tlov would the progasal 6e likely to iaerease diaeharge to vater; emissloni to alr; praduet2on, atorage, or releasc af toxie or ha:ardous sub:tancec; or psodu:tton af noise? Construction epuiDment used to install,the ater_ line oroduce emissions and noise. Proposed etsturec to avoid csr redute such incrcasew are: The water lines are available to the site. Canstruction wauld be minor. 2. ltov vould the propasyl he likcly to af(ecz piants, anlrasls, fish, or marine lite' Plants will be removed durinq eonstructian. AnimaZs will not be affected bv extens? on af water service into thi y area. Prapased =eaiuree to svoii! os teduce suth effects are: Minirnaal canstructian. 3. ?'.o++ vould che proparal be likely to deple[e energ-y or natural reraurces? Water will Ie u:til?zed tor future need~_ Prvposed mzatvres to ptatcet or tosu etve enexg7r and rratural resources are: Maintenance and reaulatian +of water needs will he conducted by the existinq staff. 4, tlav vcuAd the propaoxl be 1lktly to usa or slfeet envfrooaentally seruisive aress ar areaa drsignated (or eligible or under ■tudp) for gavernmeetal pra[ection, ruch aa parks. vilderness, wild tnd scenic riverr, tlwrea[aoed or endangered spreies }ub1[at. hlrtortt ox tul[ural aitem, ueelands, tlood platru, or prioe farelands? The prQposal will nat affect envirvrmentallv sensitue areas. Propnaed aeasures to protect such resaurcca ar to rvatd or reduce impacta acet NrA xew. z~~lae ~ C ~ • ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ SPORAh'E ENYIRONHENTAL OADItiA.`7CE TO bC 00lfPLE'•LD ET APPL1CAXf Evalua[Son for P.scncY 1ip,'r. C'rl~' D. SUPP1.EtSEt7:AL SHEEI FOR :10liPROJECf ACII9175 (touclnue~) S. Rov vould the proposal ee 1lkely to aifett L nd and shoreline use, including vFuLher ic vw ld ai'. ~or encourage land or snorelloe ucei lncompatible with exliting plans? Water would be provided to pronerty nreviouslv 7-nnPr3 _ residential. - ~ Proposed seasures to avold or rcduce shorellne and L nd use iapatts are: No adverse impacts are anticipated. 6. Hov vould the proposal be likely to :a:rls:e !ew ndt on tranaportation or publie services and util!- ties? There will be an increase ir-,_ 'E.man<:i foi-cl Irriqation bistrict water_ Proposed messurcs co reduce oT respond to •uch demand(s) are: Off-site improvements to the existing water system will be made. Identify, if possiDle. vhcther the proposal aay contllc[ with local, scate or federal L vo or requireuenu for the protectlon of [he environmertt. I No conflicts. ! I - - - - ~ - - - - III i S ILNANF.Y'. ~ 1. the underslgned, weaT undec tbe pcoalty of perjury ttut the above responscs sre u de truthfully and to the best o[ my knovledge. I a!•n uoderstaad thac, sAould there be •ny villful sioreprementstion or villlul Lck ot full disclosure on oy part, the a enc ear vlthdrav e;,i, deter'laatlon oi nonsiQnificance tfu[ it niahc lssue !a rellance upon thla checklist. I Ex. Lutheran Good Samaritan Society DBA/ n.«: ~-02 7, PlOQOOtAt Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Village ~ (Please Psint or :rpe) Proponent: ddr~ss: 17121 E. 8th Avenue _ ( natute) Phone: a(509) 924-6161 Spokane, WA 99216 - - - Person completing foro: Frank R. IC32 - - - - - - - - Ct : ~ : ~=i ~ ' i !•t„~~,r: Mq) I 1 ( 10R STAFT USE UNLT Staff omber(s) revieving checklitt: ~ % I ' - ~ f~'~ _ Dased on tpis stsit reviev oi the environmeatal checklist •nd other pertlaent iafotaatloo, [he staf': / A. Concludes tlut there are no probable signifiunt adverse ispicts aed recommends • dececm,netion of nccwignific.ncc. B. Concludes tlut probable signliiu nc adverse iapacts do exist for the curreat proposal and TtCOfOtDd{ a altiEated de[ermica:;o: norulEaifieance with eonditionr. C. Concludes tTuc there •rc probaEle significsat •dverse envirorasental lapacts and reeossends • detetsination ot si`niticance. 2 . r R-ezojue'ZE-20--gis ~ w~ ~ Am f.I 'y ' N u T OfFi 00 ~Y • EL • ' t ! MI. ST. ~o, • ~ 'i° R.IQ. ~ " FL 4640 • , 4 • n Z` ~ z 2 nd^ ~ 2N0 W a~~j • . - us ~ R'o• v P~L~,OR' Q['•E ( : ,,.--~•.,.a~c 9 ~+u ~ -~~•V ~ y ~ • ~ V 1 • : . . E. ► ~ FIGNTM AvE : : . . ~ 2rh TVE. • f ' ~~rc oai . ' ~ ~C Cs ~ i ~ ~r S'~~ • ~ • / i . ~ ~ . 1 ip L ► ' . r ~ a'-" ~ • ~ ' _ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ ~ I «0o Samari*tan" v ASPAR 13 _ . ~ - ~ - . ~ 18 q let ~ r ~ - ~ ~ LK I ~ T ~~t ( m ` p.4- 1.E Z _ i ~J~ .r ~ T OFFI ~ t• AV I SILO ~ V M I N = C 1 , ~ : oo ~ w ii 1~-. P P • . "AR . .r... _ ~ ~1f~1~~ ~ . n~' ~ ~f J ~ ' . Fc.~,~2 • FL . ~D49 ° 9 ` G• M. ST ST. P~ F' R R G4 ~L ~ 1~ Z ~ • c ~ - - ---.r-=` - • - ~ r 2ND 2 ►+dA ' ~i c., " N 3 4p. . _-t~.-• ~ f ~ RURT ~ 1 v1 a rir 1lYE. , ~ ...1-.. J~.,.- , • 8 A' D , E ~rE'LLEYJ y• aC,o9 ~ M~~~~ • ~ G.4KE r ~ -~:XK:~•= E l GNT H AN E _ so/~ ~ ~ 12Th AvE ~ . ( i • i . IDAt E. . a ( ~ ~ . . ~ . S~P~ • ~ r . ~ - --ti, • _ _ - - - - t ais` ; . • s~+ j~~ • °ri ~ ■ , ~ Spokane Va ey ~ Good Samaritan Viliage . , 60 .11) D GO Qa Change of Conditions Xeu r• eo' 2Et ~ TD ZG-L0-9J . ~ Located in Secti~on 24, T25N, R44E., W.M. ~ Spokew CountY, we**Oon JIA.Y, i9996 , mAc„~ ~ ~ ~ I nrm " _ 2 mn un ~wa ~MLNbII > ~ wenno ~ ~ " ' a mr. i' aiavyai.riari eo~r nu ,.n ~ ono nwa wa ~oiw..u {uaiD s ' o nda~e um r y . io~n n wn rw Aoc on wx Y~ wom w"one r4rf ii n so ~ 4. anw ~ r~ ~ oIiu s w ~ g ~ ou~ naus ia o~w~o !S! ~ 9 w A a 1 pow*= cal ro ai ro we~ ww" ~af4AmL= Y/C1R MMIOIC I QJtlUI M MM R~p} V WIIN Jn aMM 1117C (uao~~1°"utR mrw ocra=nsun nca erncr ~Coa+ni eVENuE b.ar S.8973'43'E 1J01.1E' Mar ~ ramwr ~ • ~ i~: j.L~W , • . P/1MIMG r ~ A ~ ~};7i WMWIr111MyA"y. I i_ - ~ ~ . R toumi Q QQ v roan~c ~on ~ u.u~a i m i~doao / AIIiCT t' ~~~L D~MG \Q MWOM NEA • ww•~w e MAN-MAOE ~ P" POXO ~ . ~r~ j,~) , • ~ ~ - _ _ $ , " ~ • ~ ' ~ a n.~ n m~w~ :.wo.es~. ~.w . • . . . . Q ~9 ~ tl ro~ e r ~+w t.~i~w :wwre~a:- $ so s.K. Is ~ . . , . ~ ~ • ~ , : b d :r.:' rp • •r~ "Mune; ~ ~~~r ~ • ~ ~ ~ • ~ g ~ ,wAcr ro~ 2 cava Mu M ~ . M ~ • ~AILMM ~ ~ f • H~ ~ ~T~Yor mtto«'~y. tna rxu ~ ~i. f~r rwr.~ ~•.p~ / T~" P~I swi n~~(rl i+s~ ~ Sd9:IJ'<I E 1JOS~01' 4 SPQ(AME YM1ET COOp WIMTAX aKANGE a caanas m a-zo-9s ~ ~a w ~w ~ - PE-I&A-96/ZE-46-96/1 _ _ ~TD 5 96 ~.ALL L { A. u ~ - Iz I r• Alw .,v,t ST OFFI w ~~M1 1N Z ~ O Y z u e ~ oo~ ~ ; qrk . ~ + =pQ4! p fc .M. ST. P~ P. R.R. Gp~ ! ~ G . . , ~ g . , . . 2Np ndA 'j Z ~ ~F'' s 4G~ • , '1 W ~ . lL • ~ . ' 21JAIH r . ' v~ ~ 8 R' DG E E`L LEY t AKiC , . . , . ~F IGN-r H . . . , ~ ~ ~ s4 ~ , . IZTM AVE, ~ ; , N: . . ~ a Dai E II ~G~ • ' . ~ . r ~ p•T~ ~ ~ . ~~_L':s. tirri,~ar•~....' . , . s ~ y ~ • ~ ^ . J 42 t • ~ ~ 1 I!~ ~ ~ IN y P' ~'~,r ~ ~ ; • • • ~0. ~2 . . 4 • r~ ~ ~ ~1 ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ . J ~ . 1 ' k8975'28'w 66d15 7! P I P U D PI f i ~+cT , 3~.- , a . - re iminary . . , an o Valley Ridge Located 'n Section 19, T25N., R45E, W.M. Spokal 1e Wunty, R aVt*4N 1 SEFTEMBER 1996 ~l niJ K- 1c~ , ~y ✓ Y~ ' / ~ % ~v~IC~ W~OM/ ~ VIIMIY t~ry, n~~~ W,S~ y, ' ' / f d1 ~K rllh ' I 1Y/t f~ ~ iT I ~ ~,vu/.vuiia% i .a»~M i ~ ~ " ~ aw .A..ME, ~ AMI ✓ ~ ' ~ ~n w., n.n ~i~wn ~u ~ Ac ia i ~ ~ ~ { M11Y,EOM YM~ l-1 Q/►7) t/►Lt Csrm f~~l,~ Mli~vu~ ■ G000'SU~uXt41, ~09~ ~v Ou/IR I.q tll ~ ~ ~ m awm ~a {04 ~ 3.-~. / rrrLorm nrrtr, ~ nroa U+~. . °n` e nn Lsa Rw~ ~ mtn"x a PON Cn~ . ~ PNi..' .o."'a ~ a. romw ar "u c iPW.a owe oea NKeet i i ' ~ . \ w■ ~ ~ I ( I ' ,y~,. , ~ `i ~ ~ , rn I • ~ g cwa~ne ulol r'q~ p°m ~ a we rwee 0 1 ~1sARA af1/i00 0~ ~ ~ l~t = ; I + \~(r~y /1 ~ \ ~ ~ •4 ~V.f~iiM/.~//A'F'/.!?'/~,'.Y/H//rY,:•/.~ 1[lo I p IOat' = ~ 'i/ ~ ' ~ ` J~'~~;) 4`~°"~-~ uanH .VcHa. ~ i~j% ~ , • ~ - - ~ - - ~ ~ ~ - - , ~ ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ ~q ~T~~ m ec vAr.AIIe ~ ~y R C ` /R ~7`/~p`~cprl ~ . ;-/~~-~!/,i ~ V~~ r ~ I 1lf f • .,e\ . ~ \ ♦ ~ , v { _ ~ % 4 / L~ ' 1„a• , ' `i;~ - _ _ ~ ~ 0 \J • ~ ~ s r~ w~u.o~~ - ~ ' ( w x) o w qo r"-'~ti~.~ r J'; ~ „ ~`~~,,,a, ~ itAM ~scut 1• - eo' uw4 ~i St;-= 1 ' ~ e 1 n' , TR 7. . ~ ~ . 3, ~ ~ 1 ~ , , , ~ ~~~j -nnro~rnW, -.1 `n .,..ruc.w ~ R mfYan n rlwv rmnrc oern nmvf ~ ~ ~ •\~_r~.y~ r4 Ua[f MM wnpLio w ~(Nk MMr V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1~ ~ ~ • ~ ` ~ i ~ N S l~ Q , ~ ~C.~~ ~ ~ : N ~ •ti ~ ! h ~h11x Le~fwaioL loo. X~u.. , N • ~ ; • p~ S(TE PLAN °~~~~=•-4 ~ ~ O Fi! F~ w~0 ~ar ~ , ti 4 00 14 40 OF RECORD ~ N.e9;u'41'w. 567. 70' rHB-&r+,.nr Pu D. PLw oF 4ALLEYRIDCE I ' minary Plat of ~ ~ ~ . Pre . ~ ~ e n.nb s F r , ° . ~ ~ ~ ~ b 2lAOD Sf Va ey Ridge , ix1ao sr. za nan rum 't.wo -0 ~~t!~,~" I T2~, R` A~ ~ W.M. ~ scro.a (?n-~ ~ ~ /~/~p+ y{i`V~1 ~ ~W 1M Nr+v11 ~ l 1 1 1P O . ~ -L1 M ~2uc' s~ ~ ~_L VI I l[ll]R~ r \/~J~//~/~ 1~, Wnp~y , ~I•'--- , ~ neoo sr ~ - :o m0141 uiuu- SEP i~ &ER, 1996 q % , SLRKN ~ N i - - 4► uS % 't y1,~ ~ ~ , y y ~ 7 ~ 11,~00 S1. 10 RCM 14pp ~ / ~ ~ ~17o sr i ~y ~ s[ID,Q m~ . • ~ ~ p ' ~ i;aoo sr. , nrmrx Wna~w mm wrrtr mr. ; ou. .arc rrur ~m ,www w~a ` / ~na un ~ ar+a it..oo e sr TM.[i'e' ~ % Mwc r rm b ~ ' na) coSuw~ .HU 'o .e.~x u.wo sr , ~ ~ g ~ ~ OM DATA ~ ru~ ~ an m •I ~ mr eoM ~ ~ C. E~omxc YW/NC Y 41E ~ ~_i t~ri ~ 11~0~ YG wa n ~~l ~ N +i.9o0 S.F. Rcw ~ oom v.wuet~n .o o iaw ■ un 0 oomo~ ru Uucs i osm u Lun /a w~ ~ 0 3- \ 11.700Sf /////lIdAY//HA• 4 Mlir. lOa ' PmAno 8 ZQ' ~ ~ Vp DVJMO 11Nf t 1 ID~1 ~ IIML! u lDq n.~a0 t ~i~ ~ ~ w~r im ~ nAm v. 2 ~ _ nynai , q.t~ r % .~aw[ ~ m iLm v tr ~ ww Am^ ►w ss+ twc r wos+f y gr1 m w ore Yf m rir w ...a u~4j~I wo "ALc nw ~ 15 7p0 9t :i nac on~n ~ OI I W~ , ~/i//l/i~% ylml m11W MLL[Y FQ2 ~T . ~ ~ ! ~ ~ iNi//i/i//~ii0'//////N//,N•u/,vM'i% r i \ ~ wn,un ~p _ _ Qan+ .~Mx_ ~ I j~ • r 10 BC vIU1i0 ~ nR.c,ro• ~ ~p ,•~~~o~~~ ~ twAa Mu ~ 7.65 ACIIIS i ii.tOD 5f. it.iGD if i y'• ~ 11.700 SI I ' 11100 S.f ff R~ ~ Q Aff/ iL1~N+ rp L7, ~ ~1 60 SD 0 60 170 ~nA:I'C G-ruur~' N~ SC,uf 5' n 6~' fUl MJIPf Wr H M, o 1 11.100 s r NauemM Siom~-C~dbodr ~~r~ ~~t'~ ~ n w mm M.~ w~ w~va~m w.•+ RECEIVED M(ruxD Ii ~I n~Y lr~'N Oi~~ NtAM M DMNOI IfHfSO~f Iu 1CNM YPN~ n SPOKANE COUNiY ~ oainoun W wnu , O n 96 •o• C~ ~ 1e 7 66 AOICS ~ Arnriwt U41b»ems b2i0' " DlVIS!(' 0F EsULNNIF--, RN-D ;':AiJNlNG °m,:•'-d:": " ,•.•o p~p ~..e w rN 8 aY: S!Y E P lA N pqEUy~lAQY PLAT 0F ` r VNl£Y RIDCE - N.89 JJ'41'W. 667.1D' 41 r} I~-[L~l - IVEIVORANDUM DA'I'E January 22, 1997 TO: Scott Engelhard FROM • Steve Stairs ~ ~I~l(Illr SUBJECT: Good Samarrtan Traffic Study s~WCOWN . I have reviewed the responses from Jim Borgan wfth respect to my October 22, 1`996,, review of the Good Samaritan Traffic Study and report A(though I still have some differences of opinion with some of the responses, I believe this study has adequately analyzed this proJect With respect to the p-roject impacts, the capacity analysis print-outs that I pravided with my October 22 comments show the LOS for the intersection of Tschirley and Sprague is `F' for the PM peak hour This intersection is,failmg because with the (arge EastNVest volumes on Sprague, there are not sufficient gaps to allow left turns from Tschirley Additianally, as drscussed in response 6, a four percent annual growth was to be applied as background grvwth I did not find this was done If the four percent growth had been applied, the levels of sennce would have dropped even further into `F' With the traffic prajec#ions showing the additionai volumes expected to use the TschirleylSprague and App(eway/Sprague intersections, a signal and geometric changes are being considered for this area Since this project would derive a benefit frvm the signal, the Good Samaritan proJect should participate in fundrng the signal If you have any questions regarding my review of the information provided, please don't hesitate to ask REcEIvE~ ~W,A W ° J A N 9 6 1996 ~ or Engnneanngg -nc S~OKANE COUNTY ENGINEER CivilDesign arld I.arld Planrlirlg pflncipals Pe►ry M Taylor PE Stut►ley R Srrrlrng MurkA Aro►tson PE David C Lcrrseii PE Assoraates Scorr M Buscli PE Frank R lde ASLA Chief Financial Officer January 15, 1997 Edwui G Wagntld Mr. Steve Stairs Spokane County Engineers W 1026 Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 RF,: Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Traffic Study Dear 1VIr Stairs Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the comments in your October 22, 1996 memorandum to Scott Engelhard. Although we did not receive the memorandum until mid- December, we thank you also for your promptness in clanfying the intent of your comments The following responses are organized in the order noted in the memorandum Each response is preceded with a short paraphrase of the onginal comment 1"The report as not sealed by lacensed professronal enganeer". Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the report signed and sealed by a professional engineer. 2"77ze ITE land use category The project is considered a PUD only because the duplex units are clustered on the site, thus falling into Spokane County's Zoning Code definition of a PUD ITE defines a PUD as a residential project with multiple types of dwelling units, including supporting retail and recreational amenities ITE recommends using more specific tnp generation categones when the specific types of residential units are known, as in ttus case 3"Only one site access (is shown) Presently, the Tshirley Rd /Eighth Ave comdor provides the only access to the existing facdity A second access was discussed with Pat Harper and Fire Distnct 1. Given the existing topography, there are no feasible alternatives for providing additional accesses 106 W Mission Ave • Spokane WA 99201 2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 4. "The capacity analyses use a peak hour factor of 0 95 (The default value in the Haghway Capaccty Software, HCS, when a PHF of 0. 93 was (observed) " As demonstrated by the attachment to your October 22 memorandum, the difference has a minimal impact on delays Furthermore, it has been observed in numerous other traffic studies that, as LOSs detenorate (i e, approach LOS "F"), the PHF approaches 100, which would mean the project could not be as detnmental 5. 1 was unable to dupltcate the capaccty analysis prrntouts Version 2 1(a) of HCS was used n the report Subsequently, Version 2.1(c) has been released which evidently shows lower LOSs for the same conditions Nonetheless, the attachments to the October 22 memorandum indicate that, at a 95 percent confidence level, the longest queue with the project would be three vehicles for northbound movements, hardly what one would consider LOS "F" for the minor movement at an unsignalized intersection Furthermore, Version 2.1(c) estimates the 95 percent queue length without the project to be 2.1 vehicles for northbound movements While conducting the actual traffic counts, no queues exceeding two vehicles were observed, nor were any excessive delays observed Finally, as was discussed, northbound Tschirley at Appleway is wide enough to allow left turns and nght turns to be made simultaneously Consequently, the actual capacity of the intersection is somewhat better than that which was analyzed 6. No background projects (were) added As we discussed dunng scoping of the study, Spokane County recommended a four percent per annum growth rate be used for the study. Hopefully, these responses adequately address your concerns If you have any additional comments or questions, please feel free to contact me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, TAYLOR ENGINEERING, INC . /7WAA-ZP,5 Cl'ames E Borgan Bln Transportation Engineer Enclosure cc Scott Engelliard Jim Droppcrs Taylor Engineering, Inco CNd Design and Land Planning 106 W Mission Ave o Spokane WA 99201 2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328 8224 ~ ~ r-- L r- ~ ~ i TaLylor En~eeri.g, Inc. CivA Design and Land Planning "'A w r ~ lw • • 1 or E n Inc. Ovil Design and Land Plann.ing Princ; pals. . Perrv M. Tay(or, P. E. .Stanley R. Stirling .bfark A. Aronson. P. E. Dcrvid C. Lirserr. P.E. Associatcs: Scntt M. Bttsrlr. P.1:. Frank R. ldc. :1SL.A Chief Financial O(Tcer: Echt•in G. lt~tgntilcl ' . ~ LLF,Y GOOD SAMARITAN TRAFFIC STUDY ~ Date: September 19, 1996 Prepared By: Jim Borgan ~ y~r~.,~,,~'►.; z:;,, ~ A~' ' , . ~~f. Ls ' ~AL • , ~~/o 106 W. Mission Ave. • Spokane, WA 99201-2345 •(509) 328-3371 FAX (509) 328-8224 Tayl or Eri.gzriek__ rirzg , Iric _ 106 West Mission, Suite 206 Spokane, WA 99201 (509) 328-3371 S P O KAN E V A L L EY G O O D S AMAR = T AN Traf f i c Study TECHNICAL SUMMARY August, 1996 I. STATEMENT of PURPOSE / PROJECT SCOPING The proposed project is the construction of 56 duplex units (in 28 duplexes) and 50 "assisted living apartments" in the Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Retirement Village. The purpose of this report is to summarize the results of the traffic study for the proposed project as required by Spokane County. II. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES and METHODS The basic analytical approach followed standardized princi- ples and procedures described in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRANSPORTATION and LAND DEVELOPMENT (T&LD), as supplemented by the Transportation Research Board's (TRB) NA TIO- NAL COOPERAT I VE HI GHWAY RESEARCH PROGRAM REPORT 18 7(NCHRP 187), and ITE's TRAFFIC ENGINEERING HANDBOOK. Other standard references used in this study included, but were not limited to, the following: (1) ITE' s TRIP GENERATION; (2) TRB' s HIGHWAY CAPACI TY MANUAL / Speci a l Report 209 (HCM); (3) The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) MANUAL on UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES for STREETS and HIGHWAYS ( MUTCD) ; (4) The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A POLICY on GEOMETRIC DESIGN of HIGHWAYS and STREETS; III. PROJEPT DESCRIPTION Exhibit l,,on the following page, is a location map showing the proposed project's site. As shown in Exhibit l, the site is located south and west of 8th Avenue between Flora and Tschirley. Exhibit 2, on page 3, is a preliminary site plan. As shown in Exhibit 2, the proposed project is the construction of 56 duplex units and 50 "assisted living apartments" in the Spokane Valley Good Samaritan Retirement Village. IV. BASE YEAR CONDITIONS The analysis of traffic impacts and operations focused on the intersection of Sprague Avenue and Tschirley. Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study ; POigIIfE VALLEY GfOQD SAWITAN 1 August, 1996 , EXHIBIT l: LOCATION MAP - ~ , ~ ~ U=0N AVE ~ J. g0 BROADWAY AYE SPRINGFIFlD AVE T ~ AIAI AVE ' ~ ~ VAlILYWAY s ~ SPRAGUE AVE SPRAGUE AVE ~ ~ o 4TE AvE ` 6TN AV,T is~ 8M AVE 8Tg AVE PRO.-EC-n SF-E Schcmadc of 1993 Spokeao County Road Map AWTa lor ' MomeeIF N mg, / ~ 0- A Civil Design and Land Plarming NOT TO SCALE Tayl or Engineering, Inc. Traffic Study SpOKNE y,Al.r.Ey (OpD SAMARITAN 2 August, 1996 EXHIBZT 2: FRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 4r, rr.8975 ze`w 668 1s' 1 FEEwk ~ 3 2 TFtAcT i ~1 CDuU4N AraEA 17,633 S.F- ~ ~ 5 ~ f / ~ ✓f~ ~ ~1~ i f~' r ,I to 0 ~ f/ ~ f" , `4~ ~ ~+'rFi3 ~ ~ i '!///.1f~/,f.~`/✓~~: ~ 5„v~~ VA;91~ ' !x~ -s '~a G iA~.. l~fn p f ? •'i~ + ~ , ~r"~ ~ 4-'C"~ ~ " ~ ~ ~jr ' /j'!%..~i.i~J~ ♦ 3 f i ,h ~ "7 r ~ ~r • ~ff ~ J,~t~A.' S 2`" f~{✓i/~ ~ 1 Ch (C ~ w ` :~1 ~.TRAr-r w~u0N RR~4 ~ : ~ ~ ~ f; 4E.43B S.F. J ~,~Cr 'G" . / COWIICK-1 AREA E)aSiiNG r~ 11.900 F. ~ ~ • G": ' e y,~ r , 5P4r• artE va:_LEr "'`!s/flJrrl~~r OtID SAAA,iRIT CA AN r' Ar r' ~ I f ~ i!~/!/'fi%`/./ffi`/•~1 /f' i f~ , ~ s • I Y~~ ~ ~ . . r ~ ~TLAtaO NEw taCK dA-DE-SAC 1N ~LiCk f . ~ TRACT 'p" ~IOri A~tE+~ 0 ~(tUND RC ~66 AGRES 'e"7 + N,,. Rrt^vR9 m~ fl" ~v i ~ ~ ; fi . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~--y~`--~- ^ s.v,~*a~a.r~s . • _ - wOeR ~PYi♦ttt~~~ 47FY Lk:. ~ ~ A1fJp+} . . . ~ ` - Lk J ACT ' ~ IJ~. A_`A ~ .7_ ~ ~ ' `w ~ , ~ ~ ~ 0~ ~ +i~i► _ ~ ~ x-.: i1 r . +9~ . ~ ~ wEttnNo ~ Y y -am ~wi~ . ~ ~ ? : • `ry ~ ~ ~ 1`I~ j, ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ - ' , ` ` ~ . ` . .~2 ti ! ;r'. ~ ~ 0 8 1~ ,A ~ ~ ~ • so e. . . ; . . . ~ 41 z 0 do ~Y .o, ~J~,--►. 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .7 ~~~E r~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ 40 ~ I . • ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~'~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ` N,8933'41nW 66/ry.7Q' ~ ~nP L.S. 113775 Taylor Fhqineering, Fnc. Traffi c St udy .SPQXAXE VALLFY GOOD SAMAftI TAN 3 A ttgtrs t,.I 99+5 A. ROADWAY SYSTEM Exhibit 3, on page 5, shows the lane configura- tions of the intersection and the traffic controls. As shown in Exhibit 3, Sprague Avenue/Appleway has a five lane section at Tschirley; Tschirley, a"Local Access Street", is about 30 feet wide and is a two lane road. B. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Since turning movement counts were not available, a"peak period turning movement survey" was taken at the intersection of Sprague Avenue/Appleway and Tschirley. Based on Spokane County's traffic counts, it was determined the peak hour of traffic in the site's vicinity is in the afternoon / evening. Con- sequently, it was selected as the "design hour", and 'the "peak period turning movement surveys" were taken between 3:30 P.M. and 6:30 P.M. The results are also summarized in Exhibit 3, on the following page (Attachment "TM" provides a listing of the entire data set). C. EXISTING "LEVELS-of-SERVICE•' The standard procedures for determining opera~iyg conditions estimate "levels-of-service (LOS's)" 1 . The "ideal" capacity of a typical ro1d~aay is about 1,800 vehicles per hour (vph) per lane 2~. The worst congestion on roadways usually occurs at intersections where competing traffic flows (e.g., left turns -vs- opposing movements, etc.) "share" the roadway's capacity. . Capacity analyses were performed using "Highway Capacity Software", computerized implementations of "The concept of '1 evel s-of-service' is defined as a qual i- tative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perception by motorists and / or passengers. A level -of -service (LOS) definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort and convenience, and safety. Six 1 evels-of-service are defined. They are given letter designations, from 'A' to 'F', with LOS 'A' representing the best operating conditions and LOS 'F' the worst." HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: SPECIAL REPORT 209 (HCM 85), Transportation Research Board, Washing- ton, D. C. (August, 1985). [2 1 HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL : SPECIAL REPORT 209, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C. (August, 1985). Tayl or IIr2gineering, Inc. Traffic Study SFOIUsNE Y,ALZEY G04D SAMARITAN 4 August, 1996 EXHIBIT 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS and I-S TURNING MOVEMENTS ~ i -18 ft.--►+ c~ AG P1~~. 3s ~ ~ ~ ~ a• f-- SPRAGiIE AV~. - 35 m~a a• Shoutder - _ \ t ~ ~ _ c±W ~ ~ • ~ ~ r~ ~SP,~~ . ~ 744 43 634 a~ w M . r O O% ~ 38 ft. ti t LEGEND w Taylor ' ee~' , BIC. s~ s~~ & ~ ~ i~r ~ ~~on of stop ' ' Design and Land Planning ~ ~patp-d CmaswOk ~ ~ dy~ vr r.llg~neez~rg, ~11C. Traffi c St udy SpolomE VALLEY GOOD SAMARITM 5 August, 1996 procedures contained in HCM; Exhibit 4 summarizes the results (Attachment ".CAff contains the output of the software). As indicated in Exhibit 4, all "critical movements" have acceptable levels-of-service for urban conditions at unsignalized intersections (LOS "D" for "major movements" and LOS "E" for "minor movements"). EXHIBIT 4: EXISTING "LEVELS-of-SERVICE" Sprague Avenue & Tschirley (Unsignalized) DELAY MOVEMENTS (in secs) LOS Northbound Lefts & Rights 37.7 E Westbound Lefts 5.7 B ~ Intersection Delay = 1.3 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = A Delay = Delay per Total Vehicles 5.0 sec or less LOS "A" 5.1 to 10.0 sec LOS "B" 10.1 to 20.0 sec LOS "C" 20.1 to 30.0 sec LOS "D" 30.1 to 45.0 sec LOS "E" Over 45.0 sec LOS "F" V. CONDITIONS with the PROPOSED PROJECT Tschirley provides the primary access for the proposed project to the regional system; consequently, the focus of the study was Tschirley's intersection at Sprague/Appleway. A. TRIP GENERATION The standard reference for estimating trips generated by land use category is the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GENERA TION. Exhibit 5 is a summary of the resul ts including a listing of the actual output of the software). As shown in Exhibit 5, the proposed project is estimated EXHIBIT 5: ESTIMATES of TRIPS GENERATED by the PROJECT DR-WAY TOTALS VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 268 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER 6 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT 6 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL 13 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER 14 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT 11 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL 25 Tayl or F7igineering, Inc. Traffi c St udy SPOIGNE VALLEY GOQD SAMARITAN 6 August, 1996 to generate 268 vehicle trips per day (vpd) on an average weekday ("average weekday traffic volumes" AWDT`s). Of those, only 13 vehicle trips per hour (vph) occur during the morning rush hour (i.e., less than five percent), and 25 vph occur during the afternoon/evening rush hour (i.e., a little over nine percent). B. TRIP DISTRIBUTION / TRIP ASSIGNMENT Trip distribution (i.e., the basic orientation of the trips coming to or going from the proposed project) was based on the existing turning movements and parameters contained in NCHRP 187. Exhibit 6, on the following page, summarizes the resulting trip , distribution. As shown in Exhibit 6, the predominant orientation of traffic generated by the proposed project is from/to the west. C. FUTURE "LEVELS-of-SERVICE" with the PROJECT Using the same procedures as were used for "background" traffic, estimates of "levels-of-service" with the proposed project were made; Exhibit 7, on page 9, summarizes the results (Attachment "CA" contains the actual output of the software). As shown in Exhibit 7, the levels-of-service remain acceptable for urban conditions. VI. FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the operational analyses, it was concluded no mitigation measures are needed. i Tayl or F.nqineering, Inc. Traffic Study SFCiVWE VALLEY GOOD aAMARITAN 7 August, 1990 EXHIBIT 6: E3TI14ATES of TOTAL DHV TRAFFIC w/ PROJECT , ♦--18 ft.-h c~ ~ AP I SPRAGUE AVE - 35 mph 5 • b' Shoulder \----'r'_'_-- ~ ~ ~ ~,a►'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,~c~ 750 0 ~ 22 w ~ CrJ N N ~ z =A SC.ALB ~ 38 !t s i LEGEND irmiw Taylor E ' ee ' , Inc. • ~ Sip & ~ s~ r ~ ~ . Civll Design and Land Planning ~ DedpoWd CmsWal ~ , , Tayl or Ehgineering, Inc. Traffi c St udy S9IG1UM VALLEY COOD SAMARITAN 8 Augus t, 1996 EXHIBIT 7: FUTURE "LOS's" with the PROPOSED PROJECT Appleway & Tschirley (Unsignalized) w/o Project with Project DELAY DELAY MOVEMENTS (in secs) LOS (in secs) LOS Northbound Lefts & Rights 37.7 E 44.0 E Westbound Lefts 5.7 B 5.8 B Intersection Delay = 1.3 sec/veh 1.8 sec/veh Intersection LOS = A A Tayl or E7igineering, Inc. Traffic Study SPaUM VALLEY GOGtD SAMARITAN 9 August, 1996 ATTACHMENT TTJRN I NG MOVEMENTS ATTACHMENT "TM": TURNING MOVEMENTS A"peak period turning movement survey" was conducted at the intersection of Appleway & Tschirley; the actual results are tabulated below. Following the tabulation are summaries of the results as well as the projections for the proposed project. P.M. Peak Period Turninq Survev for Avolewav & Tschirlev AClt1AI, COattTS EASTBOUND APPLEHAY fiESTB00ND APPLEKAY NORiHBOUKD tSCHIRLEY S00lfiB001(D Feb 13, 96 1 Start Fad Left Right I,eft Right beft Aight LeEt Rigbt ?ine tine ?urns Thru 'lurns TO?ALS Turns 'fhru 'turns 'tOTBLS Turns lhcu 4utns ?OTBLS 'turns Rhru Turns TORALS TOTA1,S 15 30 to 15 35 46 2 48 3 55 58 5 1 6 112 15 35 to 15 40 54 T 61 1 63 64 6 6 131 15 40 to 15 45 49 3 52 1 52 53 4 4 109 15 45 to 15 50 48 48 3 52 55 6 1 7 110 15 50 to 15 55 49 2 Sl 3 55 58 2 2 111 15 SS to 16 0 64 3 61 42 42 5 2 1 116 16 0 to 16 5 61 3 64 1 48 49 3 1 4 117 16 5 to 16 10 53 2 55 3 68 71 3 1 4 130 16 10 to 16 15 54 6 60 2 61 69 6 1 7 136 16 15 to 16 20 45 3 48 1 72 73 5 4 9 130 16 20 to 16 25 45 4 49 55 55 1 1 105 16 25 to 16 30 51 3 60 2 38 40 4 4 s ioa 16 30 to 16 35 58 5 63 1 51 53 6 1 1 123 16 35 to 16 40 51 6 51 43 43 3 1 4 104 16 40 to 16 45 43 5 48 2 58 60 3 3 111 1645 ta1650 61 4 11 3 54 57 2 1 3 131 16 50 to 16 55 10 5 75 2 41 49 6 6 130 16 55 to 11 0 43 4 41 1 51 58 S 1 6 111 11 0 to 11 5 66 4 70 1 57 58 4 1 5 133 11 5 to 17 10 75 3 78 1 59 60 2 1 3 141 11 10 to 11 15 63 3 66 1 54 55 3 1 4 125 17 15 to 11 20 61 61 2 51 53 6 1 1 121 11 20 to 17 15 75 3 18 2 31 39 1 1 2 119 11 25 to 17 30 60 4 64 1 SO 51 4 4 119 17 30 to 17 35 58 1 59 1 41 48 Z 1 3 110 11 35 to 11 40 56 4 60 1 63 64 2 1 3 127 11 40 to 17 45 43 43 42 42 4 4 ag 17 45 to 11 50 44 2 46 1 50 51 4 4 101 17 50 to 11 55 53 4 ST 31 31 4 2 6 94 17 55 to 18 0 45 5 50 1 39 40 1 1 gl 1S 0 to 18 5 54 54 34 34 1 1 89 18 5 to 18 10 37 3 40 3 44 47 6 6 93 18 10 to 18 15 51 2 53 26 26 3 3 82 18 15 to 18 20 43 1 44 1 45 46 1 2 gZ 18 20 to 18 25 41 4 45 34 34 7 1 9 88 18 15 to 18 30 32 2 34 1 36 31 11 TOTbLS 1,920 112 2,032 411,116 1,823 130 31 161 . _ 1 . KA%IKCM FASTBOURD bPPLEiAY RES?BQQ1fD bPPLEiiAY lIORlHOIIlfD tSCBIRLEI Sp0TBOQ1(D VOLOKES - Start End Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right liae 'line lurns thru iurns !0?flLS turns lhru Turns l04ALS lurns ?hru !`uins iOtALS tuw lhru Tums TO?ES TOTALS 16 40 to 17 40 743 40 783 18 634 652 40 9 49 1,484 11 0 to 11 15 204 10 214 3 170 113 9 3 11 399 !(-FAC?OflS ,91 .94 1.02 !(/A .93 Tayl or Frigineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study / Attachment "TM" SPC19M Y.ALLEY GOiQD SIMARITAN 1 A ugus t, 1990 Summary of Peak Period TurninQ Movements & Proiections w/ Proiect INTERSECTION: Appleway & Tschirley 1996 Observed P.M. Peak Hour WEST LEG EAST LEG Total Approaching 783 Total Approaching 652 Left Turns Left Turns 18 Throughs 743 1,457 Throughs 634 11404 Right Turns 40 Right Turns Total Exiting 674 Total Exiting 752 SOUTH LEG Total Approaching 49 Left Turns 40 Throughs 107 . Right Turns 9 Total Exiting 58 TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 1,484 TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 1,484 IIVTERSECTION: Appleway & Tschirley Total DHV w/ Project P.M. Peak Hour WEST LEG EAST LEG Total Approaching 793 Total Approaching 656 Lef t Turns 0 Lef t Turns 22 Throughs 743 1,475 Throughs 634 1,411 Right Turns 50 Right Turns 0 Total Exiting 682 Total Exiting 755 SOUTH LEG ' Total Approaching 60 Left Turns 48 Throughs 0 132 Right Turns 12 Total Exiting 72 TOTAL APPROACH VOLUMES = 1,509 TOTAL EXITING VOLUMES = 1,509 Taylor Engineering, Inc. Traffic Study / Attachment "?M" SPCfUYE VALLE'Y GOOO .SAMARITAIV 2 Augus t, 1996 ~ r jT7 r MM ~ ' Y ~ ~a r ~ W xH ~H . H~ H~ U ATTACHMENT "CA": CAPACITY ANALYSES INTROI7UCT I(]N f+4'Lr'ERV I EW The standard prcacess far dete m ninc~ operata.ng conditions ESt3IYldt+~ ~~1 eWel s-vf'°S2rV1CE: (J,'(}Sss)~r~1 ~ . r],'h2 ft].C~eal" Ca.paCit ~ a typic~.l roadway is 1,8~30 vehicles per hour (vph) per lanef2~. The worst con,gestion on raadways occurs at intersections where competa.ng traffie f 1 aws ( e, g., I eft turns -vs- oppasing movements, etc.) "share" the rvadway's capacity. Capacity analyses were gerfarmed using the "1985 Highway Capacity Software (HCS85)", computerized implementation 4f the prvcedures and parameters contaxned in the Transportatian Research Board' a (TRB) 1985 HIGHWAY CAFACITY MANUAL: S.pecial RePvrt 209 (HCM85), Capacity analyses were performed far the "design hour volumes" with,out and w%th the prcrpased project. The retnainder af this attachment is the summary output of HCS85.. tl~ "The cvncept vf '1evel s-of -,service' i s defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream and their perceptian by matvrists and f ar .passengers. A,I evel -of -servi ce ( LOS ) def initi on general l y describes these eonditions in terms af such factors as speed and travel time, freedQm to maneuver, traffic interruptions, camfvrt and canvenience, and safety. Six Ievels-of-service are defined. They are given letter designations, fram 'A' tv 'F', with LOS 'A' representing the best operatin.g cvnditivns and LDS 'F' the worst." --HIGHWAY CAPAG.ITi' MA2YUAL: SFECIAL REPbRT 209 (HCM 85), Transpvrtativn Research Board, Washingtvn, D. C. (August, 1985). [2] HIGHWAY CAPACITY MANUAL: SPECIAL REPnRT 209, Transpartation Research Board, Washingtc►n, D. C. (August, 1985). Tayl vr Ehgineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study / At tachment "GA" SPCIOM VALLEY COGtiD SAMARI TAN I Augrus t, 1996 _ ~ 1996 "ERisting" Cvnditians w1a the Proiect *~*~~***~*****~~*~~~~~~~**~*~*******~*~r******~**~*****~~~**~**~* Center FQr Ma.cracomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.3 *~r**~c****~~****~~*~~;*~*~***~~***********~~**~~*~*~***~***~*~~~:~* File Name Streets: (N-S) Tschirley {E-W} Sprague AWenue Majvr Street Direction..,. EW Length of Time Anaiyzed... 60 (min) Analyst TEI Date af Analysis 2/12/96 Other Information.,.,..... 1996 Existing Conditaons Two-way Stop--control l ed 7ntersectian ; Eastbaund ; Westhvund ;Northbound ; SauthbQUnd ; L T R; L T R; L T R; L TR t o ~ -..w- ~ -w__ No. Lanes ; 4 2< o; 1 2 0; 0> 0< o; 0 4 U StopJYield ; N; N; ; Vvlumes ~ 743 401 18 634 i 40 91 PHF ; .95 .95; .95 .95 ; .95 .95; Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 mcls M ~ o o; o a It 0 o, sv/RV's 0 o; o o ; a a, cvis M ; o. o; o o ; v o; PcEis ; 1.1 i.i; 1.1 1.1 ; 1.1 Adjustment Factars Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg ) Time (t f) Left Turn Major R,vad 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Raad 5.50 2.60 Thrvugh Traffic Minvr Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minar Road 7.00 3.40 Intersection Performance Summary • F1vwRate MoveCap SharedCap AWg,Total Delay Movement v(gcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LaS By Apg NB L 46 128 > > ? 151 37.7 E 37.7 NB R, 10 876 > > > WB L 21 651 5.7 B o.2 Intersecti.on Del ay - 1.3 Intersection LOS = A Taylar E7zgineering, Inc. Traffzc Study / Attachment "GA" SPCMM YALE.EY GOOD SAMARI7''AN 2 Augus t, 1996 , Traffic Operations with the Proposed Project Center For Microcomputers In Transportation HCS: Unsignalized Intersection Release 2.1 File Name AP&TS97.HC0 Streets: (Ti-S) Tschirley (E-W) Sprague Avenue Major Street Direction.... EW Length of Time Analyzed... 60 (min) Analyst TEI Date of Analysis.......... 2/12/96 Other Information......... Total DDHV with the Proposed Project Two-way Stop-controlled Intersection ; Eastbound ; Westbound ; Northbound ; Southbound ; L T R; L T R; ~L T R; L T R - - - - - - - - - - ~ , No. Lanes ; 0 2< 0; 1 2 0; 0> 0< 0; 0 0 0 Stop/Yield ; N; N; ; Volumes ; 743 50; 22 634 ; 48 12; PHF ; .95 .95; .95 .95 ; .95 .95; Grade ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 MC's M ; 0 0; 0 0 ; 0 0; SU/RV's 0 0; 0 0 ; 0 0; CV's M ; 0 0; 0 0 ; 0 0; PCE's ; 1.1 1.1; 1.1 1.1 ; 1.1 1.1; Adjustment Factors Vehicle Critical Follow-up Maneuver Gap (tg) Time (tf) Left Turn Major Road 5.50 2.10 Right Turn Minor Road 5.50 2.60 Through Traffic Minor Road 6.50 3.30 Left Turn Minor Road 7.00 3.40 Intersection Performance Summary F1owRate MoveCap SharedCap Avg.Total Delay Movement v(pcph) Cm(pcph) Csh(pcph) Delay LOS By App NB L 56- 125 > > > 151 44.0 E 44.0 NB R 14 872 > > > WB L 25 643 5.8 B 0.2 Intersection Delay = 1.8 Intersection LOS = A Taylor Ehqineerinq, Inc. Traffic Study / Attachment "CA" SPORNIE VALI,EY GOC1D SAHARITAN 3 August, 1996 ATTACHMENT "TG•• TR I P GENERAT = ON EST IMATES I • Attachment "TG": Trip Generation Estimates INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to document the estimation of traffic generated by the proposed project. The trip generation estimates are based on trip rates contained in the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) TRIP GEIVERA T I O1V . ESTIMATED TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS RETIREMENT COMNiUNITY 56 UNITS AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 250 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 2.86 .00 1.00 160 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .08 .00 1.00 4 ' 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .09 .00 1100 5 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .17 .41 1.00 10 4-6 PM PK HR ENTER .16 .00 1.00 9 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .12 .00 1.00 7 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .28 .53 1.00 16 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .15 .00 1.00 8 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .14 .00 1.00 8 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL .29 .54 1.00 16 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .19 .00 1.00 11 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .15 .00 1.00 8 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL .34 .58 1.00 19 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.76 .00 1.00 155 SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL 2.32 .00 1.00 130 CONGREGATE CARE CTR. (units) ' 50 UNITS AVERAGE STANDARD ADJUSTMENT DR-WAY ITE Code 252 RATE DEVIATION FACTOR VOLUME AVG WKDY 2-WAY VOL 2.15 .00 1.00 108 7-9 AM PK HR ENTER .04 .00 1.00 2 7-9 AM PK HR EXIT .02 .00 1.00 1 7-9 AM PK HR TOTAL .06 .00 1.00 3 4-6 PM PK HR EriTER .10 .00 1.00 5 4-6 PM PK HR EXIT .07 .00 1.00 4 4-6 PM PK HR TOTAL .17 .00 1.00 9 AM GEN PK HR ENTER .08 .00 1.00 4 AM GEN PK HR EXIT .08 .00 1.00 4 AM GEN PK HR TOTAL .15 .00 1.00 8 PM GEN PK HR ENTER .13 .00 1.00 6 PM GEN PK HR EXIT .08 .00 1.00 4 PM GEN PK HR TOTAL .21 .00 1.00 11 SATURDAY 2-WAY VOL .00 .00 1.00 N/A SUNDAY 2-WAY VOL .00 .00 1.00 N/A Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers TRIP GENERATION Taylor Ehgineering, Inc. Traffic Study / Attachment "?L^" SUXVMNE VAGI,EY GOW SAMRITAN 1 Augus t, 1996 . r - . r ~ ~20A~ I l) w = . a~~ L ~x x m ~ ~ . _ . ~ ~n.~ _ r' j _ ~ T OFFI . ~ ~ Av,E ou oeor ~ . ~ cl -r•-- - ~ • • EL:p04l. ~ u ~ 1ST rC.p.l. ST. P~ P. R.R. GQ . . _ . . ~ 2No 0 • ~ 2 ~I~ . • . ~ , r -r 1. 1' ~ J Ro.~. w U.RT t4 ~ ' - o.s ~ 8R' DGE ~ y• • Vc G'LLEY 9 . - 4 ~ • I e,rN :~vE. \E I GHT H A`/ f- - 9 - . h.. ~ ~ , 12TH AVE. ~ pRt : I~ ~ ~ . . S~P~ • 1 ~ t~ .t~~ • 1' ' . ~ l J n~ ~A~i`! ~~1t~~S~~~~~~~~B~r~~ ~ I~i:4 y • , ~.1j~~' 6! g 3, t0.~~~N wim`~t, a - ~ ~ , > tA 3 ~ ~ o ~~G ► . ~ ~ ~ ~U') 1,~~ 1 ~ % N a 3 ' _ , o ~ , ~a ' , ~ 0 o l~ , W3 G t'1d ; ~;;r , . • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ,I~~a • ~ ~ ~ M 1 • ~ ~ i ~ ~ ' • o C~ x ' ~ 4 ~ • ~ -V L.. f _ ~t~ ~ , ~ ~ • ~ / i ~ it ~ ~ , ~ t ^ ' 1~~ " w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~a~~,~~, f ~ • ° f ~ r~ ~ . ~y1~ • . . ~ ~ ~ ~t r d • ' ~ ti \ ` t ~ ` y ~ 1 f` . „a_..,~:•..:~•...,. ~ j~ ~09 !~i , IC ~ 3~ ,,~J ~ t • _ . \ ~ a`~ ~ ~ r~ i~??~= w~ ' ; ~ l~ ~ ` • ' ii~. • i ~ . ~ ~~:~1~: ~ ' • - .00'014 • . ^ ~ ~ ~ / . . . w , ~ ~ y `yl , / ~ 1~~.. .i1 S P O K A N E ~ -4"~~~:' C O U N T Y DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DIVISION OF THF PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DEtvN'1s M. Sco'rr', P.E., DIRECTOP. October 8, 1996 Pat Harper Division of Engineering RE: Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development of Valley Ridge and Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) Enclosed you will find the traffic study for the Valley Ridge project identified above and as requested by the Spokane County Division of Engineering at the August 29, 1996 Application Acceptance and Design Review meeting. Please review the traffic study and return comments to the Spokane County Division of Building and Planning by October 18, 1996. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 456-2205, extension 228. Th you. ~ y~A'r'-- kc >r- Enclosure 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVFNUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 BvILDING PHONE: (509) 456-3675 • FAx: (509) 456-4703 PLANNING PHONE: (509) 456-2205 • FAx: (509) 456-2243 TDD: (509) 324-3166