2015, 05-05 Study Session Meeting MINUTES
SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
STUDY SESSION FORMAT
Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers
Spokane Valley,Washington
May 5,2015 6:00 p.m.
Attendance:
Councilmembers Staff
Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager
Arne Woodard, Deputy Mayor Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager
Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney
Rod Higgins, Councilmember Erik Lamb, Deputy City Attorney
Ed Pace, Councilmember Mike Stone, Parks & Recreation Director
Ben Wick, Councilmember Eric Guth, Public Works Director
John Hohman, Community Development Dir.
ABSENT: Steve Worley, Senior Engineer
Bill Bates, Councilmember Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk
Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except
Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to
excuse Councilmember Bates from tonight's meeting. Deputy Mayor Woodard mentioned he will be out
of town next Tuesday, but would like to participate in next week's meeting via telephone. It was moved
by Councilmember Pace, seconded and unanimously agreed that Deputy Mayor Woodard be permitted to
be connected to the Council meeting by phone.
ACTION ITEM:
1. Motion Consideration: Sullivan Road Street Preservation Bid Award—Steve Worley
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to award the Sullivan Road Street Preservation
Project, CIP #0188 to Inland Asphalt Company in the amount of$894,884.00 and to authorize the City
Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. Engineer Worley explained the bid as noted on
his Request for Council Action form, said the bid is good and they are ready to go with Inland Asphalt
Company. Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In
Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried.
NON-ACTION ITEMS:
2. Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year TIP—Steve Worley
Mr. Worley briefly explained the annual, six-year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) Process,
and mentioned the notes on the draft TIP, especially under project#25 and 28 which show when the PE
funds, which is the design phase, will be obligated. Mr. Worley explained that once the PE is approved,
we have ten years to get to the next phase, which is the right-of-way phase, followed by the construction
phase; he said we are aware of those timeframes, and gave as an example, we will have until June 2019 to
get the Park Road project right-of-way phase, and that the construction phase would be the following
year, or as soon as we get funding. There was some discussion about project#4 and that the project would
not be a three-lane all the way to 16°1; and per Deputy Mayor Woodard's request, Mr. Worley will check
that project.
Council Study Session:05-05-2015 Page 1 of 3
Approved by Council:05-12-2015
Mr. Worley also noted that they received new information which allows us to suggest adding another
project; and he recommends we do so with the next version of the TIP; that since the Pines/Mansfield
project they have been working to put a signal at Mirabeau Parkway and Pines; that they have been
working with the developer and an analysis was conducted and based on existing tenants and the new
company coming in with more employees, Mr. Worley said we now meet the warrants for a signal at that
intersection, which he said is very much needed, not just for the Mirabeau Parkway but for the school
children attending the nearby elementary school. There was Council consensus to add that project.
Councilmember Wick asked about adding lighting along Park Road over I-90 where a fatality occurred
earlier in the year, and Mr. Worley said he will check that. Councilmember Wick also asked about a
regionally significant project for the Horizon 2040, such as the widening of the bridge over Argonne and
to start the process for discussion of that project next year. Mr. Worley agreed.
3. Comprehensive Plan Update Land Quantity and Market Analysis Contract—John Hohman
Director Hohman went over the process for the Contract for the update of the comprehensive plan, and
briefly discussed the various phases of the consultant work as noted on his Request for Council Action
form; said concerning the land quantity analysis, the consultants will be looking at that to determine the
different zoning types, and weave the economic components into the comp plan; after which there will be
an existing condition report to discuss what we have and what are the City's needs, which will be the basis
for future development and will also help staff analyze the citizen amendment request. Mr. Hohman said
last month we received twenty-six citizen amendments requests; that the Planning Commission will
review those requests and they have a special Planning Commission set for those deliberations; all in an
effort to bring those items to Council either June 2 or June 9; stressing his goal to keep this moving and
not lose momentum. Mr. Hohman said those items would be either a "yes" or a "no" but a question
remaining will be, should those items be further looked at during the preparation of the draft document as
some proposals are relatively controversial. Mr. Hohman stated that all this is part of the process to
include the public's point of view. Mr. Hohman noted that the consultants have been working on the audit
of the existing comp plan, and are developing a large spreadsheet with goals and policies; said they
realize there are some redundant and/or unnecessary goals and policies, and the idea is to shrink the
document, and perhaps put all the goals and policies together in a separate section. Mr. Hohman said the
total contract for the first phase update was about $107,000, and this second phase will be about
$127,000; and after that phase he should know about how much total funds will be needed. There was
Council consensus to move forward with the contract for next week's Council meeting.
4. Potential Admissions Tax—Erik Lamb
Deputy City Attorney Lamb went over the information as noted in his Request for Council Action,
concerning a potential admission tax. Mr. Lamb explained that such a tax would be administered at the
local level so it would require staff time. Mr. Lamb also mentioned that Liberty Lake does actually have
an admissions tax for the limited purpose of the golf course, driving range, and mini golf and the tax is
used for parks, golf courses and other open spaces. Mr. Lamb noted staff has no means to calculate what
revenues an admissions tax might generate for our city. Mayor Grafos suggested staff get a list of
facilities taxed by other entities, like Spokane, and the amount of tax and amount of revenue, and to do
likewise for Spokane County and Airway Heights, in order to get an idea of what is being taxed. There
was some discussion about the Fairgrounds and whether a tax could be assessed to the vendors or the
public. Mr. Lamb said he is not sure how the vendor arrangement is set up and would need to research
that, but if allowable, we could make a distinction if there is a rational basis, between the vendors and the
public. Mr. Jackson suggested looking at what is allowable, as well as what would be permitted
exemptions. To clarify, Mr. Lamb said he will do more research to get specific data on the surrounding
cities of what they tax and what the revenue is, exemptions and why they are or would be exempt, and to
clarify the distinction between vendors and the public at the Fairgrounds.
Council Study Session:05-05-2015 Page 2 of 3
Approved by Council:05-12-2015
5. Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos
There were no suggested changes to the Advance Agenda.
6. Operations and Administration Ouarterly Report
This report was for information only and was not discussed or reported.
7. Council Comments—Mayor Grafos
Councilmember Wick reported that Greater Spokane Incorporated (GSI) has drafted a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) for consulting services to prepare a strategic business plan to support the
consideration of creating a Port Authority in Spokane County, and that GSI asks if we would be willing to
be a listed partner on the RFQ. Councilmember Wick said he informed GSI that he would bring this to the
full Council for Council's input; he said GSI is not asking for any funds but just if we want to be listed as
a partner, and he said he would be interested in the results of the RFQ. Councilmember Wick said the
City of Spokane Valley is listed on the document, but this is just a draft and not the final RFQ. Deputy
Mayor Woodard said he would prefer to read through the material and perhaps discuss this next week,
since it is unclear what a partner means or would include. There was some discussion about the pros and
cons of being a partner, and Councilmember Wick noted that the Airport Board, although cautious at first,
is going to be a listed partner. Council agreed to bring this back next week for further discussion,thereby
giving all Councilmembers an opportunity to read the RFQ.
8. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson
City Manager Jackson said he and Council received an update from legislative consultants Gordon
Thomas Honeywell on the outcome of some of the legislative items; said some of the marijuana
legislation has been signed into law and that Erik Lamb is looking at that legislation and we will likely
have a discussion in a few weeks; said the Appleway Trail is now in the capital budget for the Senate and
the House; regarding the lien authority legislation, said that was killed in the house finance committee but
Gordon Thomas Honeywell is looking for other legislation where this might fit in, although Mr. Jackson
said there is not much hope for a positive outcome. Mr. Jackson said the legislators are now in a special
session and suggested we wait until the end of the session for further updates.
It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting
adjourned at 6:47 p.m.
A TEl►: Dean Grafos, May
Christine Bainbridge, City 0,1 erk
Council Study Session:05-05-2015 Page 3 of 3
Approved by Council:05-12-2015
Agenda Item #1
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Council Action
Meeting Date: May 5, 2015 Department Director Approval:
Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award —
Sullivan Street Preservation Project—Sprague to Mission#0188
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 —Contract Authority
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: July 10, 2012, approved the Federal Surface
Transportation Program (Urban) (STP(U)) grant application; June 24, 2014, approved the 2015-
2020 Six Year Transportation Improvement Plan; March 24, 2015, approved the amended 2015
Transportation Improvement Program
BACKGROUND: The Sullivan Road Street Preservation project will place a two inch asphalt
overlay on Sullivan Road between Sprague Avenue and Mission Avenue. The pedestrian
ramps will also be updated and the storm water facilities will be replaced. Since the existing
intersection at Sullivan Rd and Broadway was recently constructed in concrete, this intersection
is not part of the project.
This project is funded with a federal STP(U) grant. Public Works staff designed the project.
Bids were advertised on April 10 and April 17. The bids are scheduled to be opened Friday,
May 1, 2015. A copy of the bid tabulation will be provided at the council meeting for award
consideration.
OPTIONS: 1) Award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, 2) Not award
the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, or 3) take other appropriate action.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Sullivan Rd Street Preservation
Project, CIP #0188 to Inland Asphalt Company in the amount of $894,884.00 and to authorize
the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The project budget is $1,156,500. The federal STP(U) grant
share of 86.5% is $1,000,372. The City's local share is $156,128, of which approximately
$45,629 is stormwater work that will be paid from Fund 402. The remaining local share will be
paid by the Street Preservation Fund 311.
STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer
Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulations to be provided at the Council meeting
BID TABULATION
Sullivan Street Preservation Project(Sprague to Mission) S(p®k` ,ne
LAI' 0186 Fed Aid No.:STPUL-4103(010) Valley.
BID OPENING DATE -May 1,2015 10:00 A.M.
151 DELINEATOR AND CORE HOLE EACH 12 $100.00 $1,200.00 $ 109.00 $1,308.00 $ 120.75 $1,449.00 $ 112.35 $1,348.20
152 TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM MODIFICATION L.S. 1 $10,000.00_ $10,000.00 L.S. $3,425.00 L.S. $5,520.00 L.S. $3,531.00
153 REMOVING PAINT LINE L.F. 1500 _ $1.00 $1,500.00 $ 0.99 $1,485.00 $ 1.09 $1,635.00 $ 1.02 $1,530.00
154 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING L.F. 1800 $0.50 $900.00 $ 0.21 $378.00 $ 0.23 $414.00 $ 0.50 $900.00
155 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING,TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 10 5250.00 $2,500.00 $ 41.50 $415.00 $ 46.00 $460.00 $ 50.00 $500.00
156 PLASTIC LINE L.F. 20078 $2.00 $40,156.00 $ 1.25 $25,097.50 $ 1.38 527,707.64 $ 1.28 $25,699.84
157 PLASTIC STOP LINE L.F. 50 $18.00 $900.00 $ 12.45 $622.50 $ 13.80 5690.00 $ 12.84 $642.00
158 PLASTIC CROSSWALK LINE S.F. 816 $10.00 $8,160.00 _$ 9.70 $7,915.20 $ 10.75 $8,772.00 $ 10.00 $8,160.00
159 PLASTIC WIDE LANE LINE L.F. 425 $6.00 $2,550.00 $6.20 $2,635.00 $6.90 $2,932.50 $6.42 $2,728.50
160 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 22 5121.00 $2,662.00 $260.00 $5,720.00 $287.50 $6,325.00 $267.50 $5,885.00
TOTAL SCHEDULE A $791,611.50 $840,811.84 $1,029,243.23 $1,065,155.83
*Corrected Total-Inland's erroneous total was$1,350.00
Sullivan Street Preservation Project(Sprague to Mission)
Engineer's Estimate Inland Asphalt Company Poe Asphalt Paving,Inc. Shamrock Paving Inc.
CIP 0188 Fed Aid No.:STPUL-4103(010)
ITEM TOTAL
NUMBER ITEM Unit QUANTITY Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total ost
SCHEDULE B-Storm Drain Work
200 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 $500.00 $ 500.00 L.S. $1,560.00 L.S. $1,725.00 L.S. $1,000.00
201 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF-IN I_ 1071 $1.00 $ 1,071.00 $0.26 $278.46 $1.86 $1,992.06 $0.30 $321.30
202 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. _ SO $5.00 $ 400.00 $11.45 $916.00 $12.65 $1,012.00 $10.00 $800.00
203 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 1 DRIVEWAY APPROACI S.Y. 53 $15.00 $ 795.00 $12.45 $659.85 $13.80 $731.40 $12.00 $636.00
204 REMOVE EXISTING CATCH BASIN _EACH 4 $300.00 $ 1,200.00 $468.00 $1,872.00 $517.50 $2,070.00 $500.00 $2,000.00
205 ABANDON EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 3 $300.00 $ 900.00 $520.00 $1,560.00 $575.00 $1,725.00 $700.00 $2,100.00
206 PLUGGING EXISTING PIPE EACH 3 $100.00 $ 300.00 $130.00 $390.00 $143.75 $431.25 $200.00 $600.00
207 STORMWATER PATCH REMOVAL S.Y. 147 $5.00 $ 735.00 $8.30 $1,220.10 $9.20 $1,352.40 $30.00 $4,410.00
208 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,2 IN.DEPTH S.V. _ 18 $15.00 $ 270.00 $105.00 $1,890.00 $115.63 $2,081.34 $10.00 $180.00
209 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,41N.DEPTH S.Y. 53 $17.50 $ 927.50 $54.00 $2,862.00 $58.77 $3,114.81 $20.00_ $1,060.00
210 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,8 IN.DEPTH S.Y. _ 147 $20.00 $ 2,940.00 $40.65 $5,975.55 $42.74 $6,282.78 $40.00 $5,880.00
211 HMA CL 1/2"PG 70-28 0.50 FT.DEPTH S.Y. 147 $30.00 $ 4,410.00 $49.50 $7,276.50 $71.63 $10,529.61 $75.00 $11,025.00
212 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 _ $1.00 $ 1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 _ $1.00 $1.00
213 SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 10 IN.DIA L.F. 50 $20.00 $ 1,000.00 $49.85 $2,492.50_ $55.20 $2,760.00 $45.00 $2,250.00
214 PRECAST CONCRETE DRYWELL TYPE A WITH SOLID COVER EACH 6 $3,000.00 $ 18,000.00 _ $2,180.00 $13,080.00 $2,415.00 $14,490.00 $3,200.00 $19,200.00
215 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH 4 $1,300.00_$ 5,200.00 $1,765.00 $7,060.00 $1,955.00 $7,820.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00
216 SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR EACH 3 $300.00 $ 900.00 $208.00 $624.00 $230.00 $690.00 $350.00 $1,050.00
217 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 80 $35.00 $ 2,800.00 $18.00 $1,440.00 $25.30 $2,024.00 $32.00 $2,560.00
218 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 37 $50.00 $ 1,850.00 $31.00 $1,147.00_ $41.40 $1,531.80 $70.00 $2,590.00
219 CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 16 $60.00 $ 960.00 $58.45 $935.20 $49.16 $786.56 $90.00 $1,440.00
220 BARK MULCH S.Y. 6 $20.00 $ 120.00 $52.00 $312.00 $57.50 $345.00 $54.00 $324.00
221 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 1 $350.00 $ 350.00 $520.00 $520.00 $575.00 $575.00 $550.00 $550.00
TOTAL SCHEDULE B $ 45,629.50 $54,072.16 $64,071.01 $67,977.30
TOTAL(Sell A+B) $837,241.00 $894,884.00 $1,093,314.24 $1,133,133.13
DBE Goal 8% 8% 8% 8%/ 8/
Declared DBE Amount $75,000.00 $88,500.00 $100,000.00
DBE% 8.4% 8.1% 8.8%
Addendums acknowledged Yes Yes No
Bid deposit surety bond Yes Yes Yes
Mobilization%of total 9.0% 10.6% 8.8%
BID TABULATION
Sullivan Street Preservation Project(Sprague to Mission) Sp(�kane
GiP 0188 Fed Aid No.:STPUL-4103(010)
4006011110 Valley
BID OPENING DATE -May 1,2015 10:00 A.M.
Engineer's Estimate Inland Asphalt Company Poe Asphalt Paving,Inc. Shamrock Paving Inc.
ITEM ITEM Unit TOTAL Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost
NUMBER QUANTITY
SCHEDULE A-Road Work
100 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 L.S. $80,348.24 L.S. $115,414.18 La $99,796.89
101 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 _ $6,900.00 $6,900.00 L.S. $4,150.00 L.S. $6,187.00 L.S. $7,500.00
102 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 LS. $500.00 L.S. $500.00 L.S. $750.00
103 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. _ 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 LS. $145,059.00 L.S. $105,058.25 L.S. $145,000.00
104 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN HR. _ 3120 $2.00 $6,240.00 $2.60 $8,112.00_ $2.88 $8,985.60 $3.00_ $9,360.00
105 FLAGGERS AND SPOTTERS HR. 160 $50.00 $8,000.00 50 $8,000.00 54.62_ $8,739.20 55 $8,800.03
106 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF-IN 6500 $0.50 $3,250.00 $0.26 $1,690.00_ $1.86 $12,090.00 $0.40 $2,600.00
107 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 122 $5.00_ $610.00 $11.45 $1,396.90 $12.65 $1,543.30 $12.00 $1,464.00
108 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB _ L.F. 220 $4.00 $880.00_ $11.45_ $2,519.00 $12.65 $2,783.00 $10.00 $2,200.00
109 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY APPR. S.Y. 202 $15.00 $3,030.00 $12.45 $2,514.90 $13.80_ $2,787.60 $15.00 $3,030.00
110 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE MEDIAN CURB AND ISLAND _ S.Y. 557 $20.00 $11,140.00 $9.35 $5,207.95 $10.35 $5,764.95 $15.00 $8,355.00
111 HMA PATCH REMOVAL S.Y. 608 $5.00 $3,040.00 $3.15 $1,915.20 $3.45- $2,097.60 _ $24.00 $14,592.00
112 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 2550 $2.00 $5,100.00 $3.30 $8,415.00 $6.77 $17,263.50 $6.15 $15,682.50
113 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,2 IN.DEPTH,WHEELPATH S.Y. 1911 $3.00 $5,733.00 $8.60 $16,434.60 $14.91 $28,493.01 $21.00 $40,131.00
114 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,1/2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 22279 $1.50 $33,418.50 $1.90 $42,330.10 $1.69 $37,651.51 $3.45 $76,862.55
115 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,TAPER GRIND S.Y. 5105 $2.00 $10,210.00 $5.10_ $26,035.50 $3.68 $18,786.40 $5.50 $28,077.50
116 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,2IN.DEPTH S.Y. 84 $15.00 $1,260.00 $32.25 $2,709.00 $35.17 $2,954.28 $10.00 $840.00
117 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,4 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 202 $17.50 $3,535.00 $20.85 $4,211.70 $21.95_ $4,433.90 $20.00 $4,040.00
118 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,8 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 608 $20.00 $12,160.00 $22.95_ $13,953.60 $23.11 $14,050.88 $40.00 $24,320.00
119 HMA CL.1/2"PG 70-28 0.17 FT.DEPTH S.Y. 29700 $8.50 $252,450.00 $8.35 $247,995.00 $10.76 $319,572.00 $10.25 $304,425.00
120 HMA CL.112"PG 70-28 0.17 FT.DEPTH,PATCH S.Y. 1911 $10.00 $19,110.00 $15.25 $29,142.75 $28.34 $54,157.74 $15.50 $29,620.50
121 HMA CL.1/2"PG 70-28 0.50 FT.DEPTH S.Y. _ 608 $30.00 $18,240.00 $49.50 $30,096.00 $76.73 $46,651.84 $46.00 $27,968.00
122 HMA FOR PRELEVELING CL.1/2"PG 70-28(TON) TON 100 $70.00 $7,000.00 $80.00 $8,000.00 $305.05 $30,505.00 $125.00 $12,500.00
123 JOINT ADHESIVE L.F. 3300 $1.00 $3,300.00 $0.75 $2,475.00 $0.81 $2,673.00 $1.00 $3,300.00
124 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00_ $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
125 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00_ $1.00 $1.00 $1.00
126 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 L.S. $4,675.00 _ L.S. _ $1,500.00 L.S. $6,000.00
127 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 122 $35.00 $4,270.00 $18.00 $2,196.00 $25.30 $3,086.60 $32.00 $3,904.00
128 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 220 $35.00 $7,700.00 $15.35 $3,377.00 $18.40 $4,048.00 $27.00 $5,940.00
129 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 49 $50.00 $2,450.00 $31.00 $1,519.00 $41.40 $2,028.60 $70.00 $3,430.00
130 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL AEACH 2 $1,100.00 $2,200.00 $210.00 $420.00 $920.00 $1,840.00 $2,600.00 $5,200.00
131 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE SINGLE DIRECTION A - EACH 1 $0.00 $0.00 $210.00 $210.00 $977.50 $977.50 $2,000.00 $2,000.00
132 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM PARALLEL A EACH 6 $1,500.00_ $9,000.00 $210.00 $1,260.00 _ $1,121.25 $6,727.50 $2,600.00 $15,600.00
133 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE CUSTOM PARALLEL B EACH 2 $1,500.00 $3,000.00 $830.00 _ $1,660.00 $1,265.00 $2,530.00 $3,000.00 $6,000.00
134 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 208 $20.00 $4,160.00 $14.10 $2,932.80 $16.10 $3,348.80 $19.00 $3,952.00
_
135 RAISED MEDIAN ISLAND S.Y. 557 $80.00 $44,560.00 $54.70 _ $30,467.90 $69.00 _ $38,433.00 $63.00 $35,091.00
136 ADJUST EXISTING GAS VALVE EACH 2 _ $350.00 $700.00 $285.00 $570.00 _ $316.25 $632.50 $425.00 $850.00
137 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 25 $350.00 $8,750.00 $186.00_ $4,650.00 $207.00 $5,175.00 $300.00 $7,500.00
138 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 11 $500.00 $5,500.00 $570.00 _ $6,270.00 $632.50_ $6,957.50 $600.00 $6,600.00
139 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH _ 10 $500.00 $5,000.00 $520.00 $5,200.00 $575.00_ $5,750.00 $600.00 $6,000.00
140 ADJUST EXISTING UTILITY VAULT EACH 3 $500.00 $1,500.00 $675.00 $2,025.00 _ $747.50 $2,242.50 $900.00 $2,700.00
141 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. _ 36 $10.00 $360.00 $46.75 $1,683.00 $51.75 $1,863.00 $48.00 $1,728.30
142 TOPSOIL TYPE C S.Y. _ 36 $10.00 $360.00 $20.75 $747.00 $23.00 $828.00 $21.50 $774.00
143 BARK/LAVA ROCK S.Y. 25 $20.00 $500.00 $52.00 $1,300.00 $57.50_ $1,437.50 $54.00 $1,350.00
144 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 6 $350.00 $2,100.00 $519.00 $3,114.00 $575.00 $3,450.00 $550.00 $3,300.00
145 CONDUIT PIPE 1 1/2 IN.DIA. L.F. 25 _ $15.00 $375.00 $13.50 $337.50 $16.10 $402.50 $13.91 $347.75
146 CONDUIT PIPE 3 IN.DIA. L.F. 342 $20.00 $6,840.00 $14.00 $4,788.00 $19.55 $6,686.10 $14.45 $4,941.90
147 JUNCTION BOX,TYPE 2 EACH 2 $750.00 $1,500.00 _ $670.00 *$1,340.00 $891.25 $1,782.50 $695.50 $1,391.00
146 JUNCTION BOX,TYPE 8 EACH 3 $1,400.00 $4,200.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00 $2,012.50 $6,037.50 $1,444.50 $4,333.50
149 INDUCTION LOOP,TYPE 3 EACH _ 25 $550.00 $13,750.00 $519.00 $12,975.00 $626.75 $15,668.75 $535.00 $13,375.00
150 BULLNOSE MARKER EACH 2 $350.00 $700.00 $ 340.00 $680.00 $ 379.50 $759.00 $ 353.10 $706.20