ZE-0024-01
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EX:AMINER
RE Zone Reclassificahon from the Heavy ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Industnal (I-3) Zone to the Light ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Industnal (I-2) Zone, ) AND DECISION
Applicant Samuel Campbell )
File No ZE-24-01 )
)
Tlus matter corrung on for public hearing on February 13, 2002, the Heanng Examiner,
after review of the zone reclassificahon apphcation and the entire record, hereby makes the
following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision
1. FINDINGS OF FACT
1 The apphcation requests a rezone of approximately 5 59 acres of land from the Heavy
Industnal (I-3) zone to the Light Industnal (I-2) zone, for a cash-and-carry retail store and
warehouse, and other uses allowed in the I-2 zone
2 The site is located at the northwest comer of the intersecnon of Broadway Avenue and
Fancher Road, m the NE '/4 of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 43 EWM, Spokane
County, Wash.ington
3 The site is currently referenced as County Assessor's tax parcel no 35141 2108 and 2109
The subject property is legally descnbed on an attachment to the zone reclassification
application
4 The apphcant for the proposal is The Campbell Company, c/o Samuel Campbell, 9300 East
Sprague Avenue, Suite 201, Spokane, WA 99206 The owner of the site is Nevco, Inc, Harbor
Mall, Suite 15, Bellingham, WA 98225
5 The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Hearmg Examiner
Ordinance (County Resolution No 96-0171) and the County Heanng Examiner Rules of
Procedure (County Resolution No 96-0294)
6 The requirements for nohce of public hearing were met
-
7 The Heanng Exanuner conducted a site vlsit on February 12, 2002
8 A public hearing was held on the proposed rezone on February 13, 2002
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 1
ti
i
9. The following persons testified at the public hearing:
Jim Falk Sam Campbell
Division of Planning 9300 East Sprague
1026 West Broadway Suite 201
Spokane, WA 99260 Spokane, WA 99206
10. The County Division of Planning issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the project
on January 25, 2002.
11. The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County Generalized Comprehensive Plan,
County Arterial Road Plan maps, County Zoning Code, GMA Comprehensive Plan and Capital
Facilities Plan, Phase I Development Regulations, other applicable development regulations, and
prior land use decisions in the vicinity.
12. The record includes the documents in the project file at the time of the public hearing, the
documents and testimony submitted at the public hearing, and the items taken notice of by the
Hearing Examiner. 1 • 1
13. The site is approximately 5.59 acres in size, relatively flat in topography, and rectangular in
shape. The subject property is undeveloped, except for an unpaved parking lot surrounded by
cyclone fencing located in the northeast portion. The site is listed by the Washington State
Department of Ecology as contaminated on its Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated Site list.
The central third (1/3) of the subject property has been cleaned up, but the remainder of the site is
still contaminated.
14. The site plan of record dated November 26, 2001 illustrates development of a 21,600
square foot cash-and-carry warehouse-type building in the central portion of the subj ect property.
The building would be used to sell groceries and related items. The applicant intends to
eventually develop the remainder of the site for speculative I-2 uses.
15. Effective January 1, 1991, the zoning of the site was reclassified from the Industrial zone of
the now expired County Zoning Ordinance to the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone, under the Program
to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The site is also located in the Aquifer Sensitive
Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the Zoning Code.
16. The current rezone application, environmental checklist, site plan of record and application
fees were submitted on November 27, 2001. On such date, the application was complete and
subject to the land use processing procedures set forth in County Resolution No. 1-0700.
17. Effective January 15, 2002, the County implemented a new Comprehensive Plan ("GMA
Comprehensive Plan"), County Urban Growth Area (LTGA) boundaries, and Phase I
Development Regulations; all in implementation of the State Growth Management Act. The
County also repealed the interim development regulations previously adopted by the County
under the State Growth Management Act. See County Resolution No. 2-0037.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 2
~ 18. The site and the surrounding area are designated in the County UGA. Prior to January 15,
2002, the site and such surrounding land were designated inside the County's interim urban
growth area boundaries.
19. The Phase I Development Regulations allow rezone applications that were "counter-
complete" before the adoption of such regulations on January 15, 2002, pertain to land located
within the UGA and are inconsistent with the GMA Comprehensive Plan to be processed under
the comprehensive plan and land use regulations in effect when the application became "counter-
complete". If tlle rezone application is approved, the new zoning is effective for a period of one
(1) year, and development of the property may proceed under the conditions of the rezone
provided a building pennit is submitted within the 1-year period. After the 1-year period, the
zoning of the property will "crossover" to the zone designated in the crossover matrix of the
Phase I regulations. If a timely building permit is applied for, the conditions of the prior rezone
continue to apply; provided, if there is a conflict between the conditions and the development
standards of the crossover zone, the more restrictive standard applies.
20. The Phase I Development Regulations require any rezone applications submitted after
January 15, 2002 to be consistent with the GMA Comprehensive Plan category for the property, '
and with the implementing zone set forth in the Phase I Development regulations for such
category.
21. The site is designated in the Heavy Industrial category of the GMA Comprehensive Plan,
and within the UGA. Under the Phase I Development Regulations, the crossover zone for the
current site is the zoning of the site prior to January 15, 2002 (I-3). The implementing zone for
the site, under such regulations, is the I-3 zone.
22. The Examiner must consider the current rezone application under the comprehensive plan
and development regulations in effect on November 27, 2001, the date when the application
became complete. Th.is includes the old Comprehensive Plan ("Comprehensive Plan"), County
Zoning Code, County Road Standards, Critical Areas Ordinance, Stormwater Control
Ordinances, interim development regulations for land located inside the County's ILTGA
boundaries, and other development regulations in effect on November 27, 2001.
23. The site and surrounding properties are designated in the Industrial category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The site and surrounding land is also designated in the Spokane City
Fringe Area, Aquifer Sensitive Area, Urban Impact Area and Priority Sewer Service Area
designated by the Comprehensive Plan.
24. The land lying directly southeast of the site, at the northwest corner of the intersection of
Broadway Avenue and Fancher Road, was rezoned to the B-1 zone in 1993, and is developed
with a convenience store/gas pump facility. The other land lying near or adjacent to the site is
zoned I-3.
25. The land lying directly north of the site is improved with an office building. The land lying
directly west of the site consists of a truck parts sales business and commercial fueling depot.
The land,lying east of the site consists of industrial uses. The land lying south of the site across
Broadway Avenue consists of an electronics service business and industrial uses.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 3
26. Most of the land located west of the southerly two-thirds (2/3) of the site, west of Howe
Road, is zoned I-2. The City of Spokane lies less than one (1) mile northwesterly of the site.
Felts Field, a small airport operated by the City of Spokane, is located northwest of the site in the
City of Spokane.
27. The County Arterial Road Plan designates Broadway Avenue and Fancher Road in the area
as Principal Arterials. The Interstate 90Broadway Avenue overpass is located approximately
one (1) mile east of the site.
28. The I-3 zone permits such uses as food products manufacturing/sales and wholesaling, but
not retail sales such as those proposed by the applicant.
29. In 1996, the County Zoning Code was amended to pennit certain retail and service uses in
the I-2 zone, including but not limited to all uses allowed in the B-3 zone; provided that any B-3
zone uses allowed in the I-2, unless specifically enumerated in the industrial zones matrix, were
required to meet all the B-3 zone development standards. See County Resolution No. 96-0787,
and Zoning Code 14.629.020 and 14.629.080.
30. The proposal includes both an industrial use (food warehouse) and non-industrial use (retail
food sales and other potential non-industrial uses). Decision Guideline 7.2.5 of the Industrial
category of the Comprehensive Plan discourages the development of such mixed uses unless they
are near other non-industrial categories, and the proposal shows compatibility with existing
andlor potential industrial uses through buffering or suitable development covenants.
31. The site is not located near other non-industrial categories; however, the land lying
southeast of the site was rezoned to the B-1 zone in 1993 for development of a convenience
store/gas pump facility. Further, I-2 zoning and uses are located near the site to the west, and an
office use is located directly north of the site. The proximity of the site to the intersection of
Fancher and Broadway, where traffic levels are high, its proximity to Interstate 90, and the recent
amendments to the I-2 zone, support the proposed retail use of the site.
32. The project would be served by a high level of urban services and facilities; including
public sewer and water, and modern utilities. The site is located in the City of Spokane sewer
and water service areas. The City is willing to provide sewer and water utility services. There
was no opposition to the proposal by neighboring property owners, or public agencies.
33. Decision Guideline 30.2.1 of the Spokane City Fringe Area encourages industrial uses in
the Fringe Area where such development both utilizes and protects natural and man-made
resources, has access to existing transportation facilities, utilizes existing utilities and services,
and spreads its impacts and benefits over a wide area. To the extent the proposal develops
industrial uses, it will implement Decision Guideline 30.2.1.
34. Decision Guideline 30.2.3 indicates that new retail and business services needed by the
expanding populations in the Fringe Area should be provided in part by neighborhood and
community shopping centers. Development of the site for retail uses may help implement this
policy.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 4
l
35. The Staff Report otherwise adequately discusses the consistency of the proposal with the
policies of the Industrial category, City Fringe Area section and Water Quality section of the
Comprehensive Plan. The Examiner concurs in and adopts such analysis by reference as
findings of fact herein.
36. The proposal can meet the development standards of the B-3 zone or I-2 zone, as
applicable.
37. The project has been conditioned for compliance with the development standards of the I-2
zone and other applicable provisions of the County Zoning Code, and the recommendations of
the commenting public agencies. As conditioned, the project will be reasonably compatible
with, and not have a significant negative impact on, neighboring land uses.
38. No public agencies objected to the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) issued for the
proposal by the County Division of Planning. The proposal will not have more than a moderate
effect on the quality of t,he environment, and the Examiner concurs with issuance of the DNS.
39. Changed conditions have occurred since the zoning of the site was reclassified to the
I-3 zone on January 1, 1991, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning
Code. This includes the availability of public sewer to the subject property, increased
commercial development and traffic along Broadway Avenue, the 1996 amendments to the I-2
zone to allow commercial uses, road improvements in the vicinity, the 1993 rezone of the land
lying directly southeast of the site to the B-1 zone and development of retail uses on such land,
increased residential growth in the area, and reclamation of a portion of the site from a
contaminated status.
Based on the above findings of fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following:
II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The proposed rezone, as conditioned, generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed rezone bears a substantial relationship, and will not be detrimental, to the
public health, safety or welfare.
3. A change in econonuc, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant the
proposed rezone, and a substantial change of cucumstances has occurred in the area since the site
was last zoned.
4. The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local
Environmental Ordinance have been met. The proposal, as conditioned, will not have a
significant, probable adverse impact on the environment.
5. The proposed rezone meets the criteria established by Washington case law for approving a
rezone, and the criteria established in paragraphs 14.402.020 (1)(2) of the County Zoning Code
for amending the County official zoning map.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 5
6. Approval of the land use application is appropriate under section 11 of the County Hearing
Examiner Ordinance, adopted by County Resolution No. 96-0171.
III. DECISION
Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, the application for a rezone
to the Light Industrial (I-2) zone is hereby approved, subj ect to the conditions of approval of the
public agencies stated below.
Any condirions of such agencies that have been added or significantly revised by the
Hearing Examiner are italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this •
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLA,NNING
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant,"
which term shall include the owners and developers of the property, heirs, assigns and
successors.
2. The zone change applies to the property currently referenced as County Assessor's tax
parcel nos. 35141.2108 and 35141.2109, and legally described in an attachment to the zone
reclassification application in File No. ZE-24-01.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, the Aquifer Sensitive
Overlay zone, and other applicable provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended.
4. The central portion of the sate shall be developed an geneYal conformance with the site plan
of record dated November 26, 2001. A sate development plan shall be submitted prior to
issuance of a building permit, as provided in Section 14.808. 040 of the County Zoning Code, as
amended. All variatzons and site development must conform to conditions of approval and the
County Zoning Code.
5. The development of Regional Business (B-3) zone uses on the site, which are not
specafically listed in the Industrial Zones Matrix as permitted uses, shall comply with the
development standards of the B-3 zone; as set forth in Section 14.629.080 of the County Zonang
Code, as amended.
6. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific
illumination and signage plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
permzt.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 6
i
7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a suitable guarantee
for the proj ect prior to release of any building permits. The landscape plan shall be consistent
with the landscaping requirements of Chapter 14.806 of the County Zoning Code. Landscaping
shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
8. The Division of Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time
frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a
Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property
described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the
Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The
property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: (legal
description)."
9. An avigation easement satisfactory to the manager of Felts Field shall be recorded in the
Spokane County Auditor's Office prior to issuance of any building permits. This requirement
shall not apply if the applicant presents a written determination from the manager of Felts Field
stating that an avigation easement is not required.
10. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Washington State Department of
Ecology for the portions of the site that are still contaminated.
11. Pursuant to the Phase I development regulations adopted by the County, the rezone to the
Light Industrial (I-2) zone herein is effective for one (1) year from the date of this decision,
building permits for any development under such zone must be applied for withzn the one (1)
year peraod, and the zoning of the site will crossover to the Heavy Industrial (I-3) zone at the end
of the one (1) year period.
12. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice, noting that the property in question is subj ect to a vanety of special conditions imposed
as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the
conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
"The parcel of property legally described as (legal description) is the subject of a land use
action by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on March 26, 2002, imposing a variety of
special development conditions. File No. ZE-24-01 is available for inspection and copying in the
Spokane County Division of Planning."
SPOKANE COUNTY BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1. The applicant should contact the Division of Builcling and Code Enforcement at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements admin,istered/enforced as authorized
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 7
:
by the state Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type,
occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements.
SPOKANE DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the
County Engineer.
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and
access plans.
3. A Professional Engineer (P.E.), licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit road and
storm drainage construction plans and a drainage report that conform to the versions of the
Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelines for Stonnwater
Management, and all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and laws that are in effect at
the tune of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application(s). The final
road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance
prior to release of any Grading, Building, or Right-of-Way Permit.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable County standards and/or
adopted resolutions perta.ining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
6. Roadway standa.rds, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane County Resolution No. 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal.
7. No construction work is to be perfonned within the existing or proposed right of way until
a pennit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
8. Frontage improvements are not required for the proposed zone change, since Fancher Road
and Broadway Avenue were improved by CRP No. 2398. No future acquisition area is required
for the proposed zone change, as the necessary right of way to implement fihe County Arterial
Road Plan was acquired in conjunction with CRP No. 2398. .
9. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 8
~
i
:
regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work.
10. The site plan for the proposed rezone illustrates a specific development for only a portion
of the site. At such time as the additional area is proposed to be developed and a site plan is
submitted for review, the County Engineer will conduct fu.rther review to deternune what traffic
impacts, if any, that the development would have on surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is
advised that mitigation may be required, including off-site improvements.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, the City of
Spokane Public Works.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Deparhnent of Health.
4. A public sewer system will be made available for the project. The use of individual on-site
sewage disposal systems shall not be authorized.
5. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. The project lies outside of the County's six-year sewer plan and inside of the Urban Growth
Area. Projects that fall within this area are required to connect to a sanitary sewer system.
2. This project lies within the City of Spokane Sewer Service Area. The applicant is required
to notify them of this proposal and conform to their requirements.
5. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
CITY OF SPOKANE DEVELOPER SERVICES
1. In accordance with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Resolution 01-103, existing City
sanitary sewer is located in Broadway and City water mains are located in Broadway and
Fancher Road. These systems are available to serve the Xeferenced project.
2. All costs associated with extending and connecting City sanitary sewer and water mains to
serve the referenced site will be at the developer's expense. Included in these costs will be City
plan review fees, permit fees, con.nection fees and inspection fees.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision _ ZE-24-01 Page 9
~
DATED this 26" day of March, 2002
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
~
Michael C. Dempsey, WSBA # 5
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, as modified by County
Resolution No. 1-0700, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone
reclassification is final and conclusive unless within fourteen (14) calendar days from the
Examiner's written decision, a party of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the
Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington.
This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant, and by regular mail to other
parties of record, on March 26, 2002. THE APPEAL CLOSING DATE IS APRIL 9, 2002.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal
period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be
inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except
holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record
will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County.
Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130, affected property owners may request a change in valuation
for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-24-01 Page 10
ENGINEER'S REVIEW.. SHEET
:LCIEYC •
('tU~Ctl ~ta!li5
As 13uilt E'lsns Rtcrivcd Rezone Filc ZE-0024-01 -01
Kuacl Ptaiis !1pproved
C'umpanian i=ilcs
tie " ftoad Slsttdarila 5-1 5-9" M r 13- ~
' Rctatcd Ftles-
NeAring: 02113,'2002 1:30 Builduig Dc:pt:
i'cchnical Rrvicw: 0 1 I14,2042 2_1; 1 IIar4wd Rd Pian ^ Eng Spt:cinl £rrs
Fnliminary Rcvicw: 'C}pe: ;
: UrKc Lut Bldg. SquBrc t=Crt
i1ate Rr~,~civrcl: 12i13,200t
tic,. I.otc: Nii. Acrrs' 5.59
Project Namc: I-3 TO I-2 WHSF SAI.F$ 4F RFST StTPPI.IES ~
Site Addre.5s N. BROAUWAY, S. UESMET. W FANC'HL'R, E. HOW'E.
Applicanl fL•►rtgc-Tow^nship-Scruun: 43 - 25 • la i'ARCEL(S): (first 21))
Samurl 1. Campbcll Canditions Maiicd: 35141.2108 35141.2IQ9
i_'ANIPBELL CUNif'ANY Fluud Zune No
9?00 E. Spragur Av Watcr Sounc Publw
SNOKANF, WA 99206 5cK'Cr Sourcc
I'honc (509)924-954' School Uist 81 _
Cire nist 01
i'hulie f)ist
(hvner
NE= VCO 1 RIC
k larb,,r I la':I , i: Company Surveynr
E31 1.1, 1N613:1M. «'A 98225- UAVIU LL'ANS & ASSOCIA'TES 1NC
E'honr (360) 734-I S:G 110 W. Gutnldo Av
l~ax i~,`Oi'3•1-r~51!; tiFdKANE, WA 99021
1'hcmr (509) 327-8697
F;,ti i 5t;(;) ;45 DE1skanr,~"u,~:ool.com
1-.ne:n~cr a1?-;~,UU ont:ict If11' JIN! i-,'1l b: Crni.~ct }:n~ '(_'1"'►I"~ Cht ~C:LII:~RI)
[~uilding 4?7-3675 Piarmjn~ a'"-~211U C'
Date Submitted Description Initials
F:ttg Netd'Criimically Cocnplcte Eng Necxf Hun-ard itd Mitigatiun
Eng Need Drrinagc I'Ianc Eng Nccd Traffic Analysis Eng Nrrd (7thcr
Eng Agrce Pay Fees Rtceived Eng Final Plat C'ees Complcted
. Copy io Accounting
Eng Agrcc f'riority I-crs Rcceived 11 J29'?OOt Eng Nrefim 4'tnt Fees Carrplcted
voticc to Puhlic / Nodcc to Public ~ 1 ~ 4 G Comptrtcd - Or NCCdS tA !)C Signctl
DtsiL,tt Dc% ialiun I)JWs (Irld)utf
on yuant<<s or
druin:►Le itcm calrulateGi
I lraring datc [3rcision App Dcn Cond Appld 130- ~
Appcalcd w 13CC Drcision App [kn Cunci App1J (:ourt
Appealed w Coun Ucrisiun App Dcn ConJ Appld
Stamqr:.d htyfurs tu Sccretnry (SandY)
titumrrJ 204 L%at I'!nns tu S:iTCtAn iSun&yl
t ~
Land Division Status: The 5.59-acre site includes two Assessor's tax
parcels No. 35141.2109 and 35141.2108 established
as a result of the approval of a Certiflcate of
Exempbon, CE-537-97 (A 8 B), by the Division of
Pianning.
Shoreline Desi nation: Not a licable,
Water Purveyor: The site is in the service area of the City of Spokane
and will be served by the City water system.
Sewage Oisposal: The site is in the senrice area of the City of Spokane
and will be served by the City sewage system.
Fire District The subject site is in Spokane County Fire District
No.1
School District and nearest K-12 The proposal is located in Spokane School DisVict #
schools: 81. However, the nearest schools are located in the
West Valley Schaol District The nearest schools are
Seth Woodard Elementary School one mile to the
northeast at Bowdish and Mission and West Valley
High School two miles to the northeast at Vista and
Buckeye.
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The subject property fronts on Fancher Road and
Broadway Avenue, both designated Principal
Arterials by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan.
The existing right-of-way widths are 60 feet and the
Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads
reports that no additional right-of-way is required.
Nearest Parks and Distence: Chief Garry Park on Mission Avenue two miles west
of the subject parcel and Edgewater Park two miles
southeasi of the subject parcel
Nei hborhood Association: Not Applicable
• This proposal is located inside the IUGA.
• This proposal is located within the Yardley Joint Planning Area with the City of
Spokane.
• This proposal is located inside a Public Transportatlon Beneflt Area (PTBA).
• This proposal is located outside all 1000' notificatjon boundaries of designated Natural
Resource Lands.
GMAICritical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Aree: The subject site is located inside the Priority
Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and is in the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) OveMay zone.
Flsh & Wildlife Habitat Conservatlon Areas: None identified on the Spokane County
Critical Area maps.
Flood lain: None identified on the FIRM maps.
Geologically Hazardous Areas: None identified on the Spokane County
Cntical Area maps.
Wetlands: None identified on the Spokane County
Wetland Inventory maps.
~
SEPA
DNS issued January 25, 2002
Comment period ended February 11, 2002
Appeal period ends the same time as the appeal time frame for the proposed land use action
expires.
ZE-24-01
Staff Report - Febniary 13, 2002 Public Hearing
Page 3
,
t ~
~
~
~
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
F~Lr: ZE-24-01
ii
Ifl DIVISION OF PLANNING ! J
SPOKATsZE COUWY - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HEARING DATE: February 13, 2002 @ 10:30 a.m. FILE ZE-24-01
PROJECT PLANNER: Jim Falk, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Zone Reclassification Heavy Industrial (I-3) to Light Industrial (I-2) on
approximately 5.59 acres for those uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) Zone.
project Data
Project Location and Address~ l The site is generally located near the northwest
_ - ` comer of the intersection of Broadway Avenue and
- Fancher Road in the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township
25, Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Parcet Numbers: - 35141.2108 and 35141.2109
Applicant and Agent Samuel Campbell, 9300 E. Sprague, Suite 201,
_ Spokane, WA. 99206, 924-9563
Owner: - ' Nevco, Inc., Harbor Mall, Suite 15, Bellingham, WA.
98225
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Industrial (I)
Existing Zoning: Heavy Industrial (I-3)
Existingi Land Pse: _ The site is vacant.
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: , - • North: Land located north of the proposal is zoned Heavy
Industrial I-3, established in 1991, previously zoned
Industrial (ZE-10141). Land uses north of the
subject site consist of an office building.
• South: Land located south of the proposal is zoned Heavy
Industrial I-3, established in 1991, previously zoned
Industrial (ZE-101-41) and Neighborhood Business
(B-1) established in 1993 (ZE-32-93C), previously
zoned Industrial (ZE-101-41). Land uses south of
the subject site consist of a quick stop service
' station, an electronic service business and an
industrial business.
• East: Land located east of the proposal is zoned Heavy
Industrial I-2, established in 1991, previously zoned
Industrial (ZE-23141). Land uses east of the subject
site consist of industrial businesses.
• West- Land located north of the proposal is zoned Heavy
Industrial I-2, established in 1991, previously zoned
Industrial (ZE-10141). Land uses west of the
subject site consist of a truck parts sales business
and a commercial fueling depot.
ZE-2401
Staff Report - Febnuary 13, 2002 Public Hearing
Page 1
,
Known Land Use Proposals and Latnd use proposals and actions within the vicinity of ~
Recent Project Approvals in the the proposal within the last ten years include the
Area of this ProjecL following:
• ZE-32-93C; a Zone Reclassification from
Heavy Industrial (I-3) to Neighborhood
Business (B-1) for a convenience store and
gas station located at the northwest comer of
the intersection of Fancher and Broadway,
, approved by the Hearing Examiner
Committee in September, 1993.
• ZE-31-95; a Zone Reclassification form
' Heavy Industrial (I-3) and Light Industrial (I-
2) to Regional Business (B-3) on 27 acres to
, develop a Home Depot store generally
located near the intersection of Fancher and
Sprague, approved by the Hearing Examiner
Committee in September, 1995.
• ZE-31 A-95C; a site plan review proposing
the development of a furniture retail store on
- 4 acres, a portion of the property which was
the subject of ZE-31-95, approved by the
_ y . Hearing Examiner in December, 1998.
• ZE-18-94C; a Zone Reclassification from
Light Industrial (I-2) to Regional Business (B-
3) to develop an indoor sports arena
, generally located between Cataldo and
Boone, adjacent to and northwest of I-90,
approved by the Hearing Examiner
' Committee in June, 1994.
_ • ZE-8-01; a Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Light Industrial
_ (I-2) to Light Industrial (I-2) on approximately
7.3 acres for those uses permitted in the
' Light Industrial (I-2) zone, generally located
north of and adjacent to Trent Avenue,
approximately 300 feet west of Bradley
- Road, approved by the Hearing Examiner in
October, 2001.
• ZE-6-98; a Zone Reclassification from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) and Urban
Residential-7 (UR-7) to Light Industrial (I-2)
on approximately .94 acres for equipment
rental/storage and those uses allowed in the
Light Industrial (I-2) zone, generally located
west of and adjacent to Girard Road and
south of and adjacent to Interstate 90,
approved by the Hearing Examiner in
September, 1998.
• ZE-54-97/PE-1848-97; a preliminary plat to
divide approximately 3.7 acres into 17 lots for
single family residences with a density of
4.86 lots per acre and rezone from Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) to Urban
Residential-7 (UR-7). Generally located north
of and adjacent to Mission Avenue and
between Center Road and Edgerton Road,
approved by the Hearing Examiner in March,
1998.
ZE-24-01
Staff Report - February 13, 2002 Public Headng
Page 2
• - - -
,~and.Diulslo~r'; S~atus:= The 5:59-acre site includes two Assessors tax
parcels No. 35141.2109,and 35141.2108 established
=~rp,K~ ~_~~#-~°---~=j as a result of the approval of a Certificate of
44_
t;~ ~-E~ ~ ~ ~ i i, i, _ .
_ , -
Exempfion. CE-537-97 (A & B), by the Division of
Fk ; ! 1 P!a nn ing.
i1 I~i
i;;3horelihe Oesignatiow. 7 - Not aQplicable.
V,vater,PUrv~yb~T~='-,' 6'i; r( The site is in the service area of the City of Spokane
;i and will be served by the City water system.
IrSewage,,O,isp~sa~:- -'i ' The site is in the service area of the City of Spokane
- , ,
and will be served by the City sewage system.
I +i HEI!~c=+=r1 tLI~-^c4rc 1 I '
, Fire,~~~9~f'~Ct„~#: The subject site is in Spokane County Fire District
-L~N0.1
~
';'Sctiodl District,and nearest=K=12 f!~! 'The proposal is located in Spokane School DisVict #
r~ s~hoots:L'~,i 81. However, the nearest schools are located In the
West Valley School District. The nearest schools are
Z-?-~
~~T
Seth Woodard Elementary School one mile to
o p ~e
.
~
-
,;y 1,4,~-* ; ,r~+,, ~~r_-
~ northeast at Bowdish and Mission and West Valley
r .t I 1 `-M~
-;,1 1, ; 1
~ High School two miles to the northeast at Vista and
' ~ ns ~I'I • i ~~E~ ~yn F pj1 I ' I~ ~ 4 ~ _rf ;~~r~ (
Buckeye.
,;~le~cest Arte~ia~;end, 0!istaKce~~_ The subject property fronts on Fancher Road and
i
_ = y~~~ Braadway Avenue, both designated Principal
Arterials by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan.
The existing right-of-way widths are 60 feet and the
Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads i=
~E reports that no additional right-of-way is required.
~
-
Ne''ar's,ti~P~rks;~i~cl;Distance:Q~T~;r Chief Garry Park on Mission Avenue two miles west
_~:~r; of the subject parcel and Edgewater Park two miles
southeast of the subject parcel
,Neighbor_hood'Assuciation: _ -=a,` 11 Not Applicable
o This proposal is located inside the IUGA.
o This proposal is located within the Yardley Joint Planning Area with the City of
Spokane.
o This proposal is located inside a Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA).
v This proposal is focated outside all 1000' notifrcation boundaries of designated Na4ural
Resource Lands.
GMA/Critlcal Areas
'Aquifer RecharAe Area:=--=- ~~~L'I= The subject site is located inside the Priority
- 11, _ ' 1f 5r^ I~ 4 f lnl
Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and is in the
; 11. 1~ = -s ~:ill~1. Aqulfer Sensftive Area (ASA) Overiay zone.
I~ish 8~ Wildrife H~bltat,~Conservationi i4reas: None identified on the Spokane County
~
~ Crifical~Area maps.
Floodplain: , None identified on the FIRM niaps.
~
Geologioally Haiardvus.Areas: None identrfied on the Spokane County
Crit'iical Area maps.
Wetlahds•~~ None identfied on the Spokane County
~ , ~i Wetland Inventory maps.
3EPA
DNS issued January 25, 2002
Comment period ended February 11, 2002
Appeal perlod ends the same time as the appeal time frame for the proposed land use action
expires.
ZE-24-Ot
Staff Report - February 13, 2002 Publtc Hearing
Page 3
Noticinq
i
Published: The Notice of Hearing and DNS were advertised in the Spokesman Review legal secoon
on January 25, 2002.
Mailed: Notice of Application and the Notice of Hearing were mailed to taxpayers/owners of property
located within 400 feet of the boundaries of the subject site on January 7, 2002 and January 28,
2002, respectively.
Site Posted: The deadline for the applicant to post the site was January 28, 2002.
1724 ComQiiance Dates
Application Accepted as Complete: January 7, 2002
Determination of Completeness issued: January 7. 2002
Date Notice of Decision is Due: May 6, 2002
Reviewinq-Agencies
A total of 17 agencies were notified of the proposal and comments were solicited on December 13, 2001
and January 16, 2002 with comments due January 10, 2002 and February 1, 2002.
. ,
Agencies Notified - Resporise Date Agencies Notified Response Date
, Retewed Receivsd . Received _ Received
Spokane County Division Yes 1/10/02 Spokane County Division Yes 1/10/02
of Engineering and Roads of Engineering;
Development Services
Spokane County Division Yes 215/02 Spokane County Division No
of Utilites of Utilities, Stormwater
Utllfty
Washington State No Spokane County Div. of Yes 12/18/01
Department of Trans. Building & Code Enforce.
City of Spokane Water No City of Spokane Yes 215I02
and Hydroelectric Svcs. Construction Services
Spokane County Fire Yes 1/4/02 Spokane Transit Authority No
Pratection District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health Yes 1110/02 Spokane County Air Yes 5/30100
District 2/4/02 Pollution Control Authority 11/7/00
Office of Historic No City of Spokane Planning Yes 12/17/01
Preservation Services
Spokane School Dist. 81 No Spokane Airport Authority No
Felts Field.
Washington Department Yes 2/4/02
of Ecology
Resnonses from the Public: No comments were received from the public for this proposal.
DescriQtion of the Site and 3urroundinq Area: The subject site is located north of and adjacent to
Broadway Avenue and west of and adjacent to Fancher Road. The site is approximately 5.59 acres in size
and is flat. The site is currently vacant except that a northeastem portlon of the site is being utilized as an
unpaved, cyclone fenced parking lot serving nearby businesses. There is virtually no vegetation on the
property except grasses. The Washington State Department of Ecology lists the subject property as a
contaminated site on the Confirmed and Suspected Contaminated sites list The central third of the site has
been adequately cleaned up and the remaining two thirds of the site is still oontaminated. Industrial
businesses are located east, west and south of the site. A service business is located north of the proposal.
Backqround: The cuRent zoning of the subject property is Heavy Industrial (I-3). The applicant is
requesting a Zone Reclassifrcation to Light Industrial (I-2) on approximately 5.59 acres. The subject
property was established pursuant to Certiflcate of Exemption, CE-367-97. The application for the
proposed Zone Reclassification was submitted on November 27, 2002 and a technical review meeting was
held on January 10, 2002. Notice of Application was mailed on January 7, 2002 and a Determination of
Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued for the proposal on January 25, 2002.
ZE•24-01
Staff Repon - February 13, 2002 Public Hearing
Page 4
3taff Analysisi
.
Site Development Plan: The applicant proposes to develop 1.73 acres in,'the central portion of the site with a
cash and carry retail warehouse. The•remainder of the site would be used for those~uses permitted -in the I-2
Zone. The site plan praposes the,deyelopment of a 21,6Msquare•foot warehouse ty,pe building with
landscaping, off street parking,and,fencing. The Zone Reclassification fs requested because the
warehouselretail operabon type of-use proposed is not a permitted use in^the Heavy Ind'ustrial (1-3) Zone. The
appiicant is requesting a generic°zone recla'ssifcation to develop those uses permitted'in the I-2 Zone.
Comprehensive Plan: The subject appiicatton,,was submftted, prior to the effective 'date of the new
Comprehensive Pian which was, January 15, 2002. Due to the operatiort of County Resolution 2-0037,
adopted by the Board,of Commissioners on January 15, 2002, the subject application shall be evaluated for
consfstency -with the Comprehensive Plan and the Spokane County Zoning Code in effect the.date ihe
application was accepted as?complete. ' The subject site is located in the Indusfial Category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Industrial Category is
intended to provide the opportunity for industrial,development and reserve land for industrial'purposes. The
purpose of this section is to guide development relafed to the man.ufacturing, processing,, warehousing,
transporting and refining of goods. The Industrial category virill be composed of a.variety of industrial,
mining ;and transportation uses and few commercial and r"esidentiat uses will be found. These sites will
idealty have site landscaping and fencing to improve their,overall appearance. Small-scale activities related
to'industrial uses such~as cafes, service stations, and parts and service stores inrill be characteristic of the
Industrial category. Public water systems, sanitary sewer systems,.storm sewer systems and other
underground utility systems such as elecfical, -telephone,, gas, and cable.services should be-available.
Streets should tie curbed,. paved and have high load-bearing capacifies.
The Light Industrial (I-2) Zone is one,of the zone classifications which implements the Industrial Category of
the Comprehens,ive: Plan. The subject property,is served by,public sewer and water services, and electrical,
telephone and gas services are available. Additional services available to the, site are solid waste
pickup/processing, fire and police protection and Spokane Transit Authority (STA) service (STA Route 94
serves the area). Two Pirincipal' Arter,ials, Broadway.Avenue and Fancher Road provide high, load-bearing
access capacity to the subject site. The following is a review'of the proposal's ~ consistency with applicable
Objectivves and Decision Guidelines of the Comprehensive Plan.
Decision Guideline 7.1.2(b) recommends that b,uffering between proposed.and.existing development.should
be required if it is determined that the proposal without buffering under circumstances, definedin 7.2.4 may
impact existing development. The proposal is adjacent to Broadway_Avenue and Fancher Road, both
designated Ptincipal Arterials by the. Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Section' 14.806.040(2)(b) of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, requires,5 feet of Type III landscaping adjacent to, all highways'and arterials:
Decision. Guideline 7.1.3(a) recommends ttiat large or medium scale industrial -sites -sho'uld' be directly
.accessible to highways, fieeways, and arteirial roadways arid sfiould not overload or congest such routes:
The project. site `is adjacent to and accessible from finro Principal Arterials, Broadway Avenue and Fancher
Road, both of which will be 'able to safely accommodate traffic generated uses permitted 'in ttie I-2 Zorie,
assuming complianceMith Spokane County road standards. -
Decision Guideline 7.1.4 states that before industrial proposals can be approved, they must conform to
County water, sewer, and utility plans,, confonn to County transportation plans, and provide the necessary
buffering. The subject site is served fby City of Spokane water and~ sewer services and said services are
capable,of ineeting the needs of the uses permitted: in,.the,l=2 Zone. The proposal, as condifioned, is
consistent with the,County Arterial Road Plan-and the utility purveyor's plans and requirements.
Decision Guideline 7.2.1 &T2.2 suggest that compatibility between industrial category and other adjacent
land use categories be maintained through` buffering and 'the change of land use intensity. The subject site
is entirely surrounded by Heavy Industrial (1=3) zoriing and therefore landscaped bu ,ffering is not required on
the north, west and south bound, aries of the proposal. However, Secbon 14.606.040(2),(b) ~of the'Spokane
County Zoning Code requires. 5feet of Type III landscaping -adjacent to Broadway Avenue and Fancher
Road.
Decision Guideline 7.3.3 recommends that industrial proposals should be approved that aid in the location
of compatitile industry equally throughout industrial areas and minimize commubng distance to residential
tE-2401,
Staff Repflrt - February 13, 2002 Public Hearing
Page 5
areas. The proposal is located in the highfy% urbanized west central portion of the Spokane Valley and is ~
wlthin a few miles of large residental areas north, east and south of the proposal.
Objective 18.1.2(a) states that development should provide for treatment of impervious surface runoff.
Decision Guideline 18.1.2.3 recommends that development site plans use standards similar to aquifer
protection regulabons. The proposal as condiboned requires stormwater runoff and treatment be consistent
with the Spokane County Stormwater Management Guidelines. Any grass perculabon, detentioNretention
ponds and/or c:ontainment devices shall be approved by the County Engineer/designee prior to issuance of
a building permit for the subject site.
Decision Guideline 18.1.4.7 and 16.1.4.9 state that new development should maintain the existing
development theme by way of landscaping, signage, and building styles. The site plan proposes a structure
that has essentially the same overall scale of development as neighboring industrial and commercial
structures. Installation of signage consistent with the requirements of the Spokane County Zoning Code will
assure signage is essentially the same as the scope and scale of signage associated with neighboring
industrial and commercial uses.
Objective 18.1.5(a) states that all development should provide adequate right-of-way and roadway
improvements therein to accommodate short and long-term projected traffic. The proposal, as conditioned,
will assure adequate roadway improvements. The County Engineer states that Broadway Avenue and
Fancher Road have adequate road right-of-way to serve the proposal.
Decision Guideline 18.1.6.14 recommends that driveways not be tocated within 200 feet of an arterial
intersection when accessing a principal or rninor arterial, within 100 feet of an arterial intersection when
accessing a collector arterial, or within 50 feet of a local access intersection. The proposal as conditioned
will be consistent with this guideline and shall be address at such time as detaited site plans are submitted
for review.
Decision Guideline 18.1.9.22 recommends that all site plans be reviewed for needed improvements to
inifiate, expand, and maintain public Vansportation service and facili6es. This guideline shall be addressed
at such time as detailed site plans are submitted for review.
Decision Gufdeline 18.1.9.23 recommends that development site plans provide parking at the rear or side of
the development in order to provide convenient transportation facilities. The proposat provides for parlcing
entirely in the front of the warehouse and appears to be inconsistent with this Decision Guideline.
Objective 16.1.11(a) recommends that the developer coordinate between water, sewer, and utility providers
to assure the slze and location of the facilities will accommodate future growth. The subject site is located
within the City of Spokane service area for water and sewer services.
Water Quality Goal 10.1 states that there be no further degradation of the Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie
Aquifer (as defined in the Spokane Aquifer Water Quality Management Plan). Objective 10.1.d states that
fill-in devefopment and development with densities which support existing or proposed sewer systems will
be prefeRed. Objective 10.1.n encourages that development minimize the amount of pollution caused by
stormwater runoff. Decision Guideline 10.1.n states that where increased stormwater nmoff potential exists
due to a proposed development, runoff management procedures should be a condition of approval. The
recommended conditions of approval require compliance to Spokane County Stormwater Management
Guidelines. Pollution of groundwater will be minimized as the project is served by the City of Spokane
sanitary sewage collection system. Additionally, all development and operations shall comply with the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone requirements in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and
Washington State Hazardous Materials handling and disposal requirements.
The subject parcel is also located in the Spokane City Fringe Area as specified in Section 30 of the
Comprehensive Plan. Section 30 provides specific policies for developing a planning process applicabte to
the Fringe Area and includes specific guidance regarding the planning issues that should be addressed for
the subject area. The City of Spokane was requested to evaluate this proposal for consistency with City
Planning policies. The City responded, stating that the City has no comment. The purpose of Decision
Guidelines therein is to provide means to determine whether or not a particular proposal within the Fringe
ZE-24-01
Staff Report - February 13, 2002 Public Nearing
Page 6
Ar,ea should be approved, condidoned, or, denied. The fiDllowing Spokane City Fringe Area Goal, Objectives
'and Decision Guidelines apply to the proposal.
Fringe Area Goai 30.1 provides for a planning process which adequately protects existing and future living
environments. Objective 30.1.a provides for present residents of the Spokane Fringe Area -a quality life`by
using the Comprehensive Plan as a primary tool for guiding developmenL The above analysis to determine
theproposal's consistency with the Compr,ehensive Plan Decision satisfles this Objective.
Decision Guideline 30.1.2 recommends that land use plans should be established and adhered to for a
reasonable periodof time to provide stability and eliminate need to reconstruct utility systems. The
adoptlon of the Comprehensive Plan in 1981 together withlhe requirement,that development be consistent
with said plan adeq'uatety,addresses this Dec'ision Guideline. Decision Guideline,30.1.4 specifles that
urbanization and development of vacant urban areas and rehabilitation of exlsting older areas should be
permitted when consistent with City; and .County Plan policies relating to utility services, open spa"ce, and
altemative living environments. The proposal is an urban "in-fll"development utllizing cuRently available
water, sewer and transportation capacity and' is therefore consistent with this Decision Guideline: Decision
Guideline 30.1.6 ,specifles that new growth proposals within the Fringe Area should consider impacts upon
the environmentand existing available resour,ce. The interagency review process-to included
recommended conddions of approval adequately addresses this Decfsion Guideline. The proposats
oonditions of approval and compliance witti all Spokane County Development regulations will assure
environmental impacts are mitigated.
: M
. 7 t.s
The proposal, as conditioned, is sdbstantially consistent~with the policies of the Industnal category of the
Comprehensive Plan. The project sife is also located in the'Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA) and the
subject application is consistent with the requirements of Spokane County Growth Management Resolution
97-0321. Zoning: The purpose of the proposed Light Industrial (I-2) zone'is, to meet the, needs for industrial land
identrfied in the Industrial, category of the Comprehensive Plan. Industrial 'uses will include processing; light
assembly, freight handling and similar operations,,.all of a non-offensive nature. It is the intent of the Light
Industrial'(I-2) zone to allow for these uses by making them compadblewith surrounding uses: General
characterisdcs of,these areas include-paved roads and sidewalks, a full line of public services including
manned fire protection and public transit accessibility. The proposed zone reclassiflcation implements the
purpose and intent of the Llght Industrial (62) zone based on the availability of adequate power, telephone,
police and fire protection services and in consideration of existing adjacent industrial zoning,and land uses,
existing direct access -to two Principal Arterials, and based on the site's close proximity to Interstate 90
access ramps which are approximately one mile east of the subject~property: The proposed zone
reclassification is generally consistent with the purpose and intent of the Light Industtrial (I-2) zone.
Even though, the applicant submitted a site plan proposing a cash and carry retail warehouse facility,, the
application is asking for zone,reclassification that allows fior the development of any use permitted1n the I-2
Zone. Therefore, this analysis does not address consistency of the warehouse proposal with the specific
standards of the I-2 Zone. However, it, is noted that the warehouse proposal as condiOoned is generalty
consistent'with requirements of the ,Light Industrial (I-2), Zone.
Changed Conditions: Section 14.402.020(2) of the-Spokane County Zoning Code states that
amendments to the zoning map may occur when it is found that "changes in economic,, technological, or
land use conditions has occurred to warrant modifications.°' Conditions have not changed in the area of the
proposal. Tliis section contemplates that the service infrastructure enhancement has occurred in the
vicinity supporting more-intensive uses, and further, that a trend in the development of more intensive land uses has begun, justifying addidonal zone reclassifications. The subject application essentialty, proposes a
dawnzone to accommodated less intensive `land' uses with less impact on the exisfing infrastructure, having
fewer adverse'impacts on surrounding land, uses compared to the uses permitted in the exisang I-3 zone.
The proposal is therefore not inconsistent with the intent and spirit of said Section 14.402:020(2).
3taff.Summary:
As conditiened by -the,reviewing agencies, the proposal demonstrates'general consistency with the
applicable Goals, Objectivessand Decision Guid'elines ofthe.lndustrial Category of the Comprehensive Plan
and generally~ conforms to the requirements of the Light Industrial, (1-2) Zone. Detailed review to determine
ZE-24-Q1
Staff Report - February 13. 2002 Publlc Heaflng
Page 7
compliance with,,all Zoning Code, regulatioms and ctlnditiowof app-oval is recommended to be ~
ladministrative and'to occur-at the Building Permif,stage. Attachments
A. Maps
o "VIcinity Map/Comprehensive` Pian
o Site Plan
o Zoning
B. Conditions of Approval
C. Agency,Comments
ZE-24-01
Steff Report = Februery. 13, 2002 Public Hearing
Pege 8
a ,
v
ATTACHiWEWT A
MAPS
• VICIIdITY flAAP
COiUIPREHENSIVE PLAId IUtAP
SITE DEVELOPMEIVT PLAPI
ZONING MAP
~ a z&24-01.
: Vicdnity NIap
. Trtml•
12
~
~
~
N&BERNsssm
mumm
cwnw
~
• ~
~
YeOcvtaav J
vaDA-Y Wq Pn
~
~
MGfn ~
ti
sOrmm
23
od
Scale :1 incfi - 833 ft (roundec) 12/05/01 Ycitdty MaP
~ Z-E-24-01
Comp-rehens-ive I.a nd Use POan
- - - -
IT
,
. ~ -
- „ -
71000 ~
I I
I •
~
- r~ I~ - -
1 ~
UU3 I
y
_ ~
! _ _ ~ LJ
i ~
,I _ - - - • I ~J'~'''~ ~ '
- ~ - ~
i.
n fn
I ~ A%
. I r ~ +
- vAuCy way PVc
~ -
_ ~ -
main - -
~
-I I - _ZLLJ
~ ~ • , '
- - -
- q _ - . r~-= - ~
Scale :1 inch - 833 h(rounded) 12/05/01 Comprehensiv+e Land Use Plan
Subjacc Property within IUGA. AA^ m=A d° Subject Property wittiin UTA. ~
4 +_+4 4 Subiect Property within PSSA. - Subject Property within ASA.
ZE-24-01
' Exosting Zonang
296'Z 1,3M251
,
- _ - L -
41
I-3' 81 I
~
~
~
1-8 2Y141
-8 1Q141 x~
1-8101 , ~ -
~ ~ A - ~ -
--If 10141
. 1 ~ 141
t-S 61 287
~ - - ~
. - - - ~ - ~
, 1-381 4 87
. -
, f-S Y180C ~8 Y8►16T a ~
+ 1-2 67 0 b 1 T' 1 I-2~1. N 2814
41 1 1 • 2 80C ~
- - L~~ - ~
~ • ~ ~ ~ I
a., c 1•321,a1 14 ssp 41 ~ h-a nl e, j
t•z 1z155 ~ _
; ~ ' 7 ss
i-a 28141 Nssa
at ~
, .
. ~ 14 28S 41 14
. I•8 2ii,41 18
~ ~ . - - •
. . .
281 , - ;
~ - . ~
. 14
41
- ' I-8 48~14j i -
. 19 . ~ . ~
Y814~ 1~, 141
Va]!ey Way, pvE. I . . . . ,
_ - . . - -
. ~
WNVI
t-S 10141 ~ _ 8 1
- - - ~ . 1•8 28141 . - -i,
.,L.
Scale : 1 inch - 500 k(rpundec) 12/05101 Existing Ioning
KVl~7 11~1_II/[t/p~ QD0268' IIO~Mt 1t~w dfA ur CN'!a0 - '
r
• ~ .
l~
i
BROADWAY AVE.
~ - -
~
~ ~ ~ .
i • ' 11 !
N ~
:1~
1
~ ^ ✓
1
I ~
~
• • ~ ~
h~j I ~ rtI , , 'M _ 1
_ /S I ` ` ,Q~ • _ ' ' " ~ _ _ ~.~.~~i _ ^
i ~ • ♦ '
l
_ _ o I o Z - - -
i
I' ~C- ~ i
y . • ~ ~ (~g i i i
~ • ~ a ~
,
.
. ~
, • `
' 1 - 7 -...:.--------i---
•
I' 1
I
1~ ~ 1
14 ~
,
a ~
t
O y ~ ~
i o 5
~ o ~
~
'j I : ~ ~k:~. .
Y V ~e7 ~Q t i-~0 i~ : ~ ~ •
~
!l
~,v,f I ~ `p~ ~T .tr}•~;:' c- .r .
• _ , ~ ~ 15.. _'1 t•'~i: ~ , a, r
1' ~ ~ ~'i.','~~~ • t ' 7~~,.,~,1h ,a!,~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~,1~' i' N . I~~J ~~,j ~t
- • ^ ;;1-`} ~1 g~?
~ ~vl.yF=•..,-a~ L5L~~
L~ . .
EMNOM
~ . - - CASH AND"CARRY
1 wr~wrw~ - mo"BOC ATHBao. SITE PLAN
e`--- .~......o~mn
w~ sakwesu
~ • .
`
~
i
.
ATTACHMENT B
COidDITIONS OF APPROVAL
. ,
_
' REC02NfMENDED~" ~°~ONDrTI:ONS~tO'F, .
APPROaVALFOR=~ZE=2'4'0.1'~_
. ~ -.aa
- . ' - . DIVISION OF PLANNING ~
~ SP
ICY
I~ COUN.
1. The proposai shall 'compiy with the requirements of the Light Industrial (I-2) Zone of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended.
2: Any site pian/development proposal shall be reviewed for compliance with the Conditions
of Approval imposed by the Hearing Examiner. All variations must confonn to regulations
set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code.
,3. Approval is required -from the, Director of the Division of, Planning/designee of a specific
illumination and signage plan for the. described property prior to the release of any building
perrnit.
4. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice,noting that the property in question'is subject'to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result af approval of a land use,action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the condftions of approval affecting the property in question. The TitW
Notice should,be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall
only be released; in full or in part; by thei Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel 'of property legally described as (insert description from fiie ZE44-01)
is the subject of a land use -action,'by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on
Febr,uary 13, 2002, ienposing •a variety of special developenent conditions. File No.
ZE-24-01 Is available for, inspecfion and copying in the, Spokane County D'niisio,n of
Planning.
5. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule, and provisions for tlie maintenance
acceptable to tfie Director of the Division of Planningldesignee shall be submitted with, a a
suitable guaranteeVfor the project prior to release of any building permits. The landscape
plan shall be be consistent with the landscaping requirements of Section 14.806. of the
Spokane County' Zoning Code. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that,
sight 'distance, at access points is not'obscured or impaired.
6. ;fhe Division of Planning shall file,with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time
frame as',allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal
period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows:
"Prior to the issuance of, any building pennit for any building or any use on the property
described herein,, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of
the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay
Zone). The'propertyw,hich iv,thef'subject of.'this natice is, mvre particularly described as
follcivtirs:-, (insert~ legal bescription).
7. Anv;,avi§ation easement;satisfactoryyto the-AanagerTof Feits. Fieldi shall be.,recorded in,the
Spokane,Couniy Auditor's Office prior tQ issuance- of,,-any,lbuilding,permits. , Thi's requirement
"shall'not;apply if-fhe"applicanfpresents-'a,~rrritten det~ermination fr~am the {IJlanager-,of'Fe1ts
-
~,~ield-s,tating that,,an,;awigation easemerit-is,riareiquired._
- .i~ .
ATTACHMENT,C
AGEfVCY COMMEtdTS ' _
. i
-
SPOKANE~COUNTY DIVISION OF BUII:DING &'CODE
ENFORCEMENT
,
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE
&'C~i~ ~~~U~Iy ~O 5, -3~675 9260
Recommended Conditions
1File Number: ZE-24-01
I-3 to I-2
T'he-applicant shouldvontact the Division of Building aad Cude Enforcement, at theearliest possible stage in order to
be informed of code requiremeats,administered/enforced as authorized by the State 8uitcfing Cocie Act.
Desigan/development concernstiriclude addressing, fire apparatus access roads, fire bydrant flow, approved-water
spstems, building accessibility, constru6don type, occupancy- classification, existing-'exterioi wall protection;aad energy
code requiremenis.
i2/18/oi
; hK:ANE 1ZEGIONAL HEAL'TH DISTt )T ,
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
Inter-office Communication
DATE: February 4; 2002
TO: Jim,.Fallc, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FROM: Donald Copley, EHS"II - EHD„ SRHD
SUBJECT:., Proposed Zone Change: ZE-24-01 (Nevco, Inc.)
1. Reference's:
a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 30', b.y David Evans, dated November 27, 2001, received by 'this office
January 17, 2002.
.x,;a; s .c, j"~.•
b) Reconnaissaace Geologic Map of 'the West Halfof the Spokane Quadrangle, WashinQton' and Idaho,
Allan B. Griggs, 1966.
c) Soil Survey,, Snokane Countv, Washi.neton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S:D.A., Marcb, 1968.
d) Spokane County, Washington, Eng-ineering Interpretations,, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
e) Spokane Countv Rules and Regulations for Sewage Disposal 'Svstems, January 19, 1995.
fl Logs of watei wells in Range 43E, Township 25N, Sections 11, 13, 14, 15, and 23.
g) Map: Spokane N.E. Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and ,Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Findings:
a) This project lies, over the Spokarie-Rathdrum -Aquifer.
b) The project -is within, Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 'and within the 'service area of City of
Spokane. Water supply will, be a publ_ic system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County,Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, -inside the
General Sewer Service Area, aiid inside the Priority Sewer_ Service Area recornmended' in the "201'
Study. The method, of sewage disposal is subject to~ approval of 'the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County, pursuant to County, Resolution '80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography, and soils in
the aiea are general.ly suitable for use of individual on-site sewage disposal,systems. The, lot is- of the
proper dimensions to permit the use of both an individual well and sewage system.
d), The project lies in a flat. area east of Howe Rd. and north of Broadway Ave. Local drainageways ~are
insignificarit.
, Proposed-Zone Change: ZE-24-01 (11 Inc.)
Page 2
e) Surface soils are classed by the U.S. Soil Conservatioa Service as Garrison gravelly, loa►m with 0% to
5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight. There is also possible contaminatioa
of groundwater. This soil would be classif ed as, a Ty.pe IV.
fl Geologically, the soils are glaciofluvial deposit`s. These geological structures generally yield -moderate
to very Iarge,amounts of water. Data firom wells in the area referenced in section 1 f shows they,are
from 65' to 320' deep and have -static water levels varying from 40' to 86' below the surface. The Ci tof Spokane has indicated.that it can supply domestic,use water for the project
-3. Required (mandatory) Conditions If Approved:
a) Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities,s the City -of Spokane .Public
`1Vorks.
b) . Water service shall be coordinated through'the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
c) Water service sha11 be by an •existing public- water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
d) A public.sewer system will 'be made available for the =plat, Use,of individuaLon-site sewage disposal
sy,stems shall not be,authorized.
4. Recommended Conditions of Approval:
a) A public sewer'system will_be made availableifor-the aproject. Use of'individual on-site sewage_disposal
systems shall not be authorized.
b) Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
c: D'uector of Utilities,-Spokane County,
c: Sponsor: Nevco, •Iac. Richard Waltrip
Hazbor Mall; -Ste: 15 David Evans & Assoc.
Bellingham, WA 98225 1-10 W. Cataldo
Spokane, WA 99201
,Sam Campbell
9300 E. Sprague, Ste.,201
Spakane, WA 99206
Undyse.ltrl~2441 Nevco tnrJlh
•
-
~ I' l ♦
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY-ENGINEER
~1026, W Broadway Ave,, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477•2243
~ _a ~ a. . i u•,o ~ ~
~cx~+r~Caatnr 6SENGINEER'S CiONDIT00NS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO: Spokane'County Division of Pianning
,
FROM: Division of Engineering &Roads scaT' &I
DATE: Janua ry 10. 2002
PROJECT: I-3 TO 0-211VHSE SALES OF' REST SUPPLIES
FILE ZE-0024-01
TechnicaVReview Date: 01/1012002 @ 2:15
Planner: J1M FALK
Sponsor/Applicant: SAIVIUEL L CAMP-BELL
Section Township Range: 1425-43
The Spokane County Engineering Department has,reviewed the above referenced application. The ~
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and OrderlDecision" should the request be approved.
Prior to re6ease of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits, for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer.
2. Applicant shall subm& for approval by the_ Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the Spokane County Standards for Road-and
Sewer Construction, the current, edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater
Management and all other applicable federal, state, and local regulations and laws that are in
effect at the time of, the plan submittal or at the.time of the development permit application(s).
Fina_I drainage plans and'drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior
to release of any Grading, Building, or Right-of-way Permit.
4. A parking plan and traf,fic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of , parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering, practices. Paving or surtacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be, required for any, portion of the project which is to be occupied or,traveled by
vehicles.
5. All required improvements shall conform 'to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications, for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and'/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise a'pproved by, the County Engineer.
CC: Applicant SAMUEL L CAMPBELL
Enqineer/Surveyor DAVID EVANS 6•AS80CIATES
Planner JIM F'ALK
,
Page 2 Engineers ti ~ •
~ Hgarinq / Reeiew / 01/1'0/2002 TR, ' i
26-0024=01
6. Roadway standands, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal.
7. ft constriaction work is to be perfornned within the existing right-of-way until a permit has been
issued by thet, County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is subject to
inspection and~ approval by the County Engineer.
8. Frontage improvements are not' required for the proposed zone change, Fancher Road and
Broadway Avenue were constructed by CRP No. 2398. No~ future acquisition area is required
for the proposed zone change, the necessary right=of-way to implement the County Arterial
Road, Plan was acquired in conjunction with CRP No. 2398: \
9. `"The applicant is advised 'that there may exist ufilities either underground or overhead effeccbng
the applicant's property. ; including pr+operty to be dedicated,or set aside future acquisition.
Spokane County will assume no financial obtigation, for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities:" "The applicant should contaCt the applicable utilities regarding responsibility fbr
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary wortc."
10. This,proposed zone change is requested for a specific development proposal using, only portion
of the total area requesting the zone change. At such time that additional'area is proposed to be
,developed and a site plan is submitted ,for,ri--eview, the County Engineer will conduct further
review to, determine what traffic impacts, if any, that the deyelopment would have on
surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised 'that mitigation maybe required for off: site
,impcovements.
END
V •
,
S I' O3K A NE• C O iJ N'I' y
A OIVIStON'pFt`HE'P[JBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT '
DIViSION OF-PLANAIWG-
MiCHAEt. V. NEEDHAWDIRECTOR
To: Jim Falk-(Division of Planning)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utflities)
Da4e: Tuesday,; February',05,,2002
Subject: ZE-0024-01 Stage: Hearing Examiner ',Phase: Hearing date 2/13/02
Fancher and Broadway, 1=3 to I-2
.SS091 The project lies-outside ;of the County's six year sewer pian 'and inside of fhe Urban' Growth
Area. Projects that fall within` this area are required to connect,,to a sanitary sewer system.
SS14A This,pr,oject lies within the Citj/ of Spokane Sewer Service Area. Applicant is required to notify
them of this proposal and confonm,to their requi~ements.
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
'Sy,stem Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
1026rW. BROADWAY e,SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 e FAX: (509) 477-2243 o TDD: (509),477-7133
,
DETEItIVgINATION OF
NONSIGNI'FICAPICE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANEETWIRONhiENTAL ORDINANCE ~
FHX-NUMBEit: ZE-24-01
DESCRII'T'ION OF PItOPOSAL: A, Zone Reclassification frorn Heavy Industrial (I-3) to Light
Industrial(I-2) on approximately 5:6 acres to develop a warehouse and restaurant supply sales
and distribution facility and those uses permitted in the I-2 Zone.
PARCEL NO.: 351'41.2108, .2109
' FIEAItING DATE AND TEWE: February 13, 2002 at 1:30 p.m.
AI'Pg.ICANT: Samuel L. Cainpbell, The Campbell Company, 9300'E. Sprague Avenue, Suite
201, Sg6kane, VWA 99206; 509/924-9547 '
LOCATBONOF PROPOSAL: Generally located ,adjacent to and north of BroAdway Avenue and
adjacent to and west of Fancher Road-near the northwest corner of the intersection of Broadway
and Fancher Roads in the NR of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 43 EWM., Spokane
county, washiAgton. LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PL-ANNING
DETERNi:INATIOPT: The lead agency for this proposalhas determined that it-does not have a probable
signific,ant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmeatal checklist,and other iaformation on fle with the lead agency. This iaformation is available
to the public on request.
This DNS' is issued under WAC 197-1 l-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at teast
15 days from the date issued (below). Comenen`ts regarding t6is' IDNS must' be submitted no later.
than 5:00, p.mr, Febr`vary. 11, 2002,,it they are intended to alter t6e DNS: ADl comments s6ould be
sent to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSI1BLE OFFICIAL: By: Jim Falk, Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Planning
1026 W., Broadway Ave.
Spokarie, WA 992 0220 -509) 47- 28
o _ -
iDAT'E, ISSUEYD: January 25, 2002 SIGNATURE:
QOMMIIM RDGARDM FNVIlZONavIDTfAL QO _ , ARE WFICCME AT 'IHE HIFARM.
APPEAI: OF TffiS D]ETERAMATION, after U becomes rfinal, may be made to the ,SPOK:ANE
COUNTY DMSION OF PLANNING, 1 st Floor, 1026 W. Broadway,,Spotcane, WA 99260. The-appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar day,s aRer the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project
This-appeal must be written.and the appellant sbould•be prepared to makespecific factual objections.
Contact ihe Division of Plaoning to assist you with the, specif cs fvra,,SEPA appeal.
Tfiis DNS was,mailed to: _
l. WA State De+,partm~ f~Ecolo (Ol~ranp~a) _
2. ~ M&ec~u n~~i~n o'f nnee~ng; `~an~po7~t~'o~hiln~er!e''toW-Bngei~rd
3. Spokane CountyDivision of Engineering, Development Services; John Hohman
4. Spokane.County Division of Utitities; Jim Red
5. Spokane'County' Stocmwater Utility;, Brenda Sims
. 6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Hotd'erby
• -
7. Spokane,County;Division of~Build'uig and Code Enforcement, Je _ff_ Forry
8. Washington State=Departrrient of Transportation; ,Mark ,Rohwer
9. Spokane County Fire-Protection' District No. 1,
10. City of-Spokane Water & Hydroelectric Services,;Brad Blegen
11. City of Spokane Construction Services, Jim, Laughtland
12. City of,Spokane Planning Services, Don Carlson
13. Felts Field Airport Authority
~
I
• S P O -1K- Lk W E O YJ w -r S _
- r
A DIVISION OF-1'HEPU61.IC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DIVISIOMOF AI:ANNING
MICHA@L V. NEGDHAM, DIRECTOR
MENiORA"UMC
TO: ~ffikam~t~
~~siffim 141,
Spokane, County Division of Engineering & Roads; John Holiman
Spokane'County Division of Utilities; Jim Red J
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Bremda.,Sims '
Spokane 'Regional Health Di strict; ,,Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building-,i Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry
Spokane County, Fire. District No. 1
City of Spokane Water & Hydro Services, Brad Blegen
City of.Spokane Constructioa Services, Jim Laughtlaad
, City- of Spokane Planning Services; Don Carlson
OVA State Department, of T'ransportation, -Mark Rohwer-
Felt Field Airport Authority
FROIVI: Jim Falk, Associate Planner-
~
DATE: January 16, 2002
SUBJECT:: Review and comments-hrihe hearing on February 13', 2002 at 1:30 p.m.
FIL-E NO: ZE-24-01 `
BRIEF IDESCRYPTION: A Zone'Reclassification from I-3 to1-2 on
approximately 5.6 acres to `develop,a warehouse'and restaurant supply sales and
distribution facility,and those-uses,perriiitted in the I-2 'Zone
1'AItCEL.NO: 35141.21'08,.2109
APPLICANT: Samuel, Campbell
Note that the `application ,aad maps were previously ci'rculated ta your agency.
Please_ review and retum any comments to -me by February 1, 2002
Attacliments: Nofiice of Public Hearing
1026 W. BRQADWAY o SPOKANE, WASHIIVGT6N.99260-0220
PHONE:, (509) 477-7200 9 FAX: (544) 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133
.
AT,OTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COQJNTY HEARING EXAMiNEit
'TO: All interested persons, ~and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY N0TIFIED 'I'HAT A PUBLIC HEAItING WILb, BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATgON'LISTEID BELOW, AS FOLI,OWS:
Application: File,No. ZE-24-01; A Zone Reclassification from Heavy Industrial (I-3) to Light
Industrial (I-2) on approximately 5.6 acres to develop a warehouse and restaurant,supply sales,and
distribution facility and those uses permitted in the I-2 Zone. Parcel No(s): 35141.21,08,.2109
Hearing-Y)ate- and Tiaee: February, 13, 2002 at.1:30 p.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, -Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building,1026
West:Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Owner: Nevco Inc., Harbor Mall, Suite 15, Bellingham, WA 98225
Applicant: Samuel.L. Campbell, The Campbell Company, 93,00 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 201,
Spokane, WA 99206; 509/924-9547
Addtess und Location: Generally located,adjacent to and north of Broadway Avenue and adjacent to
and west of Tancher'Rodd near the northwest corner of the intersection of,Broadway and Fancher Roads
in the NE'/4.of Section 14, Township 25 North, Range 43 EWM.
Comprehensive lPlan: Industrial' (I)
Exis+ting Zoning: Heavy Indu'strial (I-3)
Environmental,IDetermination: Abetermination of Nonsignificaace (DNS) was,issued by the.County
Division of Planning, as the lead agency on,January 25, 2002. The comment period ends February 11,
2002.
Itelated Permifis: In order for the project to be developed as.proposed, additional pernuts=must be
obtained as,required, by other local,,state and federal agencies. IDiviseon of Planning Staff: Jun Falk, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7228
HEARING EXAMNElt PROC'EIDUItES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted urider the rules of procedure adopt'ed in
Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. -All interested persons may-testify at the public hearing, and
xnay submit written comments and documenis before or atthe~hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to,speakers. A speaker representing each side of tlie issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner'-s decision vvill be based on the record .established before the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow,the same procedural
route as ihe underlying action. All hearings,will be conducted in.facilities that are accessible to per-sons
with,phy"sical disabilities.
Inspection .of File, Copies of IDocuinents: A Staff Report will'generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing. The 'Staff Report and application file may~ be inspected, at the, Spokane
Co.unty Divi_sion `of Planning; V Floor Pernut Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8:30 a:m. and 5:00 p.m.,, weekdays, M-F; except holidays. Copies
of dacuments will be.made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions, or,special
needs, please call the, Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Planning, 1,026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Jun Falk, Fi1e No. ZE-24-01.
• '
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
A
S"W14-CANT'' "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO: Spokane County Division of Planning
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads L.L
DATE: Janua 10, 2002 ~
ry PROJECT: I-3 TO I-2 WHSE SALES OF REST SUPPLIES
FILE ZE-0024-01
TechnicaVReview Date: 01110J2002 @ 2:15
Planner: JIM FALK
Sponsor/Applicant: SAMUEL L CAMPBELL
Section Township Range: 14-25-43
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the Spokane County Standards for Road and
Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater
Management and all other applicabte federal, state, and locat regulations and laws that are in
effect at the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application(s).
Final drainage plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior
to release of any Grading, Building, or Right-ofi way Permit.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shatl be in
accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles.
5. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
CC: Applicant SAMUEI. L CAtdP6ELL
F-ngineerdSurveyar QAVia EVAN5 & ASSOCIATES
Planr.er ..IM FIF►LK
Page 2 Engineers • .
Hearing / Rev=ew VOY/,10%2002 TR
-ZE-0029-01
;6. Roadway standards, typicai roadway sections, and drainage plan rNequirement"s are. found in
'Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to,
this, proposal.
7. No construction w,ork is to be perforrried within the existing. right-of=way until a permit has been
issued by the County, Eng,ineer. All work within the public road right of way is 'subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
8. _Frontage improvements are not required for the, proposed zone ciiange, Fancher' Road and
' Broadway Avenue wete co,nstructed by CRP No. 2398. No future acquisition area,is required
for ithe proposed zone change, the necessary right=of-way to implement the County Arterial
Road Plan was acquired in' conjunction with CRP No. 2398.
9. "The, applicant is advised that,there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside futur,e acquisition.
Spokane County will assume, no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities."' !he applicant should contact the applicable u'tilities regarding, responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work."
10. This proposed zone change is, requested for a.specific development proposal using only portion
of the total area requesting the zone change. At such time that additional 'area_ is proposed, to be
developed and a site plan is submitted for reviewthe County Engineer will conduct further
review" to determine what traffic impacts,, 'if any, that the development! would have on
surrounding infrastructure. The applicant is advised that mitigation maybe required for off-site
improvements.
END
e`•
. .
.Kimball, Sandy
_ ~ _ - - - - - - - _ ,
From: N'yberg, Gary
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, -2001 t 8:19,'AM
To: Bal'dwin, Greg
-Cc: Hohman; John; Kimball, Sandy
'Subject: ZE-24~0.1
Ttie subject property is located within the Spokane Vailey and. in sods,pre-approved for conventional.drainage systems.
No,concepi drainage plan`is require&and the submittal'is considered technicaliy'compiete regardingFstormwater. Please
stifnaaro
include,tfie attached "condition in the,Engineers staff report. ConditI°^ doc
~
1ST. CONDITIONOF AYPROVAL
FOR ZONE CHANGE NO. ZE-24-01
P'repared'-By: Gary Nyb.erg; Dev. Srvcs.
f
Date: 1'2/,18/0,1
1. A Professional Engineer(P.E:), licensed'in the State of 'Washington; shall',submit road,and
storm 'drainage construction plans and a drainage report that coriform to ttie versions of
the Spokane County, Standards for Road and,Sewer Consfruction, the Guidelines 'for
Stormwa"ter Managemenf, and all applicable federal,, state, and local regulations and Iaws,
'that are in effect at the tim& of the,_plan submittal or at the time. of the 'development -permit
application(s). The°sf nal road, and storm drainage pl'ans and drainage report shall receive
the County 'Engineer's ,acceptance .prior to (elease of any Grading,, Building; or Right-of-
Way Permit. `
PAGE 1 ' 11:09:34 18 DEC 2001
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
01315 FANCHER FRONTAGE RD .000 SHARP AV U 17 PAVED 20
FANCHER FRONTAGE RD .170 MISSION AV (START) & U 17 PAVED 20
01311 FANCHER RD (START) .000 STANGLAND RD R 07 GRAVEL 20
FANCHER RD 1.610 COUNTY PIT #40-21 R 07 GRAVEL 20
2.250 FANCHER RD Y R 07 GRAVEL 20
2. 3 2 0 LADD RD ( START ) R 07 GRAVEL 20
2.530 GR.AY RD ( EIVD ) R 07 GRAVEL 20
4.590 END GRAVEL/START PAV R 07 LIGHT BITUM. 28
FANCHER RD (END) 4.890 MEDICAL LAKE CITY LI R 07 LIGHT BITUM. 28
01312 FANCHER RD (S°TART) .000 37TH AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
FANCHER RD .320 32ND AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 22
.380 31 ST AV ( END ) U 19 GRAVEL 12
FANCHER RD (END) .420 NORTH END OF ROPD U 19 GRAVEL 12
01314 FANCHER RD (START) .000 3RD AV (END) U 16 PAVED 40
FANCHER RD .170 SPRAGUE AV U 14 PAVED 70
.330 MAIN AV (START) U 14 PAVED 70
.350 UPRR CROSSING U 14 PAVED 70
.440 VALLEYWAY AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 70
.520 ALKI AV (E1VD ) U 14 PAVED 70
.550 ALKI AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 70
.660 BROADWAY AV EXT (STA U 14 FAVED 70
.690 BROADVJAY AV U 14 PAVED 70
.870 DESMET AV (S TART ) U 14 PAVED 52
.930 BOONE AV (S TART ) U 14 PAVED 52
.970 SHARP AV U 14 PAVED 52
1.210 BR 3502 OVER RAII,ROA U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 52
1.390 BALD4dIN AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 52
FANCHER RD (END) 1.400 SPOKANE CITY LIMITS U 14 PAVED 52
01313 FANCHER RD (START) .000 8TH AV U 19 PAVED 40
FANCHER RD (END) .060 WOODLAWN DR (END) U 19 PAVED 40
01397 FANCHER RD (START) .000 LSNCOLN COUNTY LINE R 07 LIGHT BITUM. 26
FANCHER R.D ( END ) .990 S TANGLAND RD R 07 L I GHT B I TUM . 26
01416 FANCHER RD ( START ) .000 S OUTH END TO 5 TH AV U 19 GR.P,DED / DR.A I NED 12
FANCHER R.D (END) .100 4TH AV U 19 GRADED/DRAINED 12
01454 FANCHER RD (START) .000 15TH AV (END) U 19 PAVED 32
FANCHER RD ( END ) .060 14 TH AV ( NONES TABL I S U 19 PAVED 32
05629 FANCHER R.D Y .000 FANCHER RD R 09 GRAVEL 16
.090 LADD R.D R 09 GRAVEL 16
9 Records Processed
PAGE 1 ' 11:09:46 18 DEC 2001
Raad# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Log Info..........
0 0 3 2 4 BROADWAY AV ( START ) .000 HAVANA ST & S POK:ANE U 14 PAVED 50
BROADWAY AV .090 FAIRGROUNDS ENTRANCE L3 14 PAVED 50
.630 YARDLEY RD (S TART ) U 14 PAVED 50
.760 STANLEY RD ( START ) U 14 PAVED 50
.880 NOWE ST (START) U 14 PAVED 50
.990 FANCHER RD Z7 14 PAVED 50
1.070 BROEIDWAY AV EXT ( EATD U 14 PAjIED 50
1.170 UPRR CROSSING U 14 PAVED 50
1. 18 0 LAKE RD U 14 PAVED 50
1.250 EASTERN RD U 14 PAVED 50
1.330 DYER RD U 14 PAVED 50
1.470 THIERNlAN ST (START) U 14 PAVED 50
1.510 I-90 WB ON/OFF U 14 PAVED 50
1.670 I-90 EB ON/OFF L] 14 PAVED 50
1.750 HEACOX AV ( END) U 14 PAVED 50
1.820 LILY RD (START) U 14 PAVED 50
1.840 BROADWAY AV ( END ) U 14 PAVED 44
1.880 GIRARD RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
1.940 BOW'MAN RD ( START ) U 14 PAVED 44
2.010 PARK RD U 14 PAVED 44
2.250 ELLA RD iJ 14 PAIIED 44
2.380 DICK RD (END) U 14 PAVED 44
2.400 DORN CT ( START ) U 14 PAVED 44
2.500 VISTA RD U 14 PAVED 44
2.630 BESSIE RD U 14 PAVED 44
2.760 SARGENT RD U 14 PAVED 44
2.880 MARGUERITE RD U 14 PAVED 44
3.000 ARGONNE RD U 14 PAVED 44
3.050 NlLTLLAN RD U 14 PAVED 44
3. 12 0 WI LLOW RD (END) U 14 PAVED 44
3.260 LOCUST RD U 14 PAVED 44
3.380 FARR RD (END) U 14 PAVED 44
3.510 WOODRUFF RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
3.560 WALNUT RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 4 4
3.640 HER.ALD RD U 14 PAVEI3 44
3.700 DARTMOUTH RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 44
3.760 FELTS RD U 14 PAVED 44
3.880 R.AYMOND RD ( END ) U 14 PAVED 44
4.010 UNIVERSITY RD U 14 PORTLAND CEMENT 50
4.100 VAN MARTER RD (START U 14 PAVED 44
4.130 GLENN RD (END) U 14 PAVED 44
4.260 PIERCE RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
4.330 JOHNSON RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
4.450 WOODWARD RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
4.520 BOWDISH RD U 14 PAVED 44
4.580 BATES RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
4.640 WILBUR RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
5.010 SR-27 (PINES R.D) U 14 PAVED 44
5.180 COLLiNS RD (END) U 14 PAVED 44
5.240 W I LLOWCRE ST I,N (PVT U 14 PAVED 44
5.270 VERCLER RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
5.360 WOODLP,WN RD ( S TART ) U 14 PAVED 44
5.520 MCDONALD RD U 14 PAVED 44
5.680 MCC.ABE RD (END) U 14 PAVED 44
5.900 MAMER RD (START) U 14 PAVED 44
6.030 EVERGREEN RD U 14 PAVED 44
6.280 BEST RD U 14 PAVED 44
6. 5 3 0 P.DAMS RD • U 14 PAVED 44
6.660 BURNS RD U 14 PAVED 44
6.770 PROGRESS RD U 14 PAVED 44
6.860 ST CHARLES R.D (START U 14 PAVED 44
7.040 SULLIVAN RD U 16 PAVED 58
7.310 MOORE RD (END) U 16 PAVED 20
7.530 CONKLIN RD (END) U 16 PAVED 24
7.690 SHAMROCK LN (PVT RD) U 16 PAVED 20
8.040 FLORA RD U 16 PAVED 20
8.324 CORBIN CT (START) U 16 PAVED 20
BROADWAY AV (END) 8.530 LONG RD U 16 PAVED 20
00417 BROADWAY AV (START) .000 GREENACRES RD U 16 GRAVEL 12
BROADWAY AV .130 END GRAVEL/START PAV U 16 PAVED 50
BROADWAY AV ( END ) .250 BARKER RD U 16 PAVED 50
00492 BROADWAY AV(START)(L .000 WEST END TO SWING ST R 09 PAVED 36
BROADWAY AV .030 SWING ST (LIBERTY LA. R 09 PAVED 36
.090 ORMOND CT (LIBERTY L R 09 PAVED 36
.160 FAIRWAY CT ( START L I R 09 PAVED 36
.210 S TEVENS 4N CT ( L I BERTY R 09 PAVED 36
.280 EAGLE ST (LIBERTY LA R 09 PAVED 36
BROADWAY AV (END) .440 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 36
0 0 3 2 5 BROADWAY AV ( S TART ) .000 COLENIAN RD ( START ) U 19 L I GHT B i TUM . 20
BROADWAY AV (END) .060 BROADWAY AV U 19 PAVED 22
00418 BROADWAY AV ( START ) .000 BARKER RD TJ 19 PAVED 22
BROADWAY AV (END) .490 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 22
00400 BROADWAY AV EXT (STA .000 FANCHER RD U 19 PAVED 24
BROADWAY AV EXT (END .070 BROADWAY AV U 19 FAVED 24
6 Records Processed
l
•
I '
S'_ P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DNi5lON OF Pl:ANNiNG -A DMSION OF THE I'UBUC WORKS DEPARCMFNT
NiZCHAEL V. N&L•DHAM, DIRECTOR
MEIVIQRANDU1Vi
TO: sao kofgn ~e~n zaan~~iRoadsw..s~.~prnin~~~a.Scl~~~.~ 11'
b~;
rvision o ngineering and Roads- Developnient Services; John Hohman
Division of Utilities - Information 'Management; Jim Red
Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Breada Sims
Spokane Regional Healdh District; Steve Holderby
Division of Building 8t Code Enforcement,.Jeff Forry,.Ron Hand
~~Spokane County Air Pollution'Control Authority,.Chuck Studer
; Spokane Transit Authority, Gordan Howell
Spokane School District No. 81 a~ _
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
City of Spokane Water & Hydro Services, Brad Blegen
'City of~Spokane Construction Services, Jim Laughtlan
City of,Spokane,Planning,Services, Don Carlson
WA State Boundtuy Review Hoard;- SusanWinchell
Spokaae Aixport Authority, Fel`t`s-Field
Office of Historic Areservation, TeTesa Brum
WA -State Department of Transportarion, Mark Rohwer
i'ROM: Jim Falk, Associate Planner, , s
DA'HE: December 13, 2001
SYTBJECT: ZE-24-01; Zone,Reclassification, from Heav}i.Indust'rial (I-3) to-Light Industrial
(I-2) on 5:59 acres for those uses allowed in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone.
TECI1NICAL_REVIE W 1VEETING
o Januar_y 10,, 2002_at'2:I5 P.M.
Public Works Btaildiag lst Floor Joefl Waads Conference Room
Please-review the above application-and use dhe attached TECHNICAI. REVIEW MEETING FORM
for y,our comments. The Division of Planning encourages you-to attend this meeting. The
sponsor and representative, have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend,
please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached forni to rrie`far the
meiting. The attached TECHMCAL REVIEW FORMS wiil be given to the sponsor at the meeting-
and included-,in the Division of Planning file. Thanks', for your caoperation. If you have any questions about the appticadon,please.contact me at 4774228.
NOTE: The IDivision of Planning i.s circuluting the SEPA Clnecklist for comments. This
tvill be t6e anly 4me yon *ill be `able to comment'regardiug tbe SEPA C6ecklist
foP this project.
Attachments: Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site,Plan, Vicinity Map, SEPA
Checklist Copy w/o enclosures: Nevco, Inc., Harbor Mall, Ste. 15, Bellingham, WA N225
Sam Campbell, The Campbell Co., 9300 E. Sprague, Ste. 201, Spokane, WA 99206
Richari Waltrip,, David Evans & Assoc., 110 W: Cataldo,,Spokane, WA 99201
1026 w. BROnawaY o sPOKArrE, bv/asHnvcrarr 99266-0220
PHONE: (509) 477•7200 o FAX• (509) 477•2243, o TDD:,(504) 477-7d33 -
.
i
_ Spokane Coanty
Divisiom-of P9anning
Tec6nica! Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: January 10, 2002 @ 2:1 S p.m.
Project File No.: Z&24-01
Project Location: Generally located at the Nortbwest,corner of the intersection of Fancher and
Broadway ,in the northeast'/, of-Section 14, Tovmship-~25 N., Range 43 EWM, Spokane County,
Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: l.ndustrial
ial (I-3) to Light~Industrial (I-2)
Project Description: ; Zone Reclassifcation &om Heavy; Industr
on 5.59 acres for those ,uses allovved'in the Light,tndusfrial (I-2) zone
Parcel,No("s): 35141.2108
35,141.2109
Ovmer: Nevco, tnc.
Harbor Mall;,-Suite 15
Bellingham, WA 98225
Applicant: Samuel Campbell, The Campbell Company
9300 E. Spregue-Avenue,.Suite 201
Spokane, WA 99206
509/924-9547
Project P-lanner: Jim Falk
! ^
~ •
f ' -
SPOKANE COUNTY
DIVISOON OF PL4NN9NG
- ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION
PART I - '
~
~5,,.~.'~`}y°`~~~ ~~I~~ • S ~yr -:~.L{ : `3"d''`y~{~,~ ~r~q - r U., vtr i• 'rtR,,~?~S'~,•~tis,:S(-F• 'r ~~S~K M~r
K ~ a~s;/.~2e •oy'1k1 d•~ 1-'~J~S~~L~ .T U~•-~~''~3_'~_"Y._;_I~-~j~~'~~,_'n~~
Z~Applicant THE CAMPBELL COMPANY - SAMUEL L_'. CAMPBE,I:L
NlailingAddress 9.3'06 E. SPRAGUE AVENUE,,SU,I'TE 201
City -5 P 0 R A NE State ' W A Zip Code 9 9 2 0 b -
Phone S 0 9) 9 2 4- 954 7 (Work) (Home) Fax 50 9) 9 2 4- 9 5 6 3
' ,Legal Owner N E V C 0, INC. _
Maiiing Address HARBOR MALL, SUITE, 15 _
,Cjfy BELLINGHAM State WA Zip Code 98225
Phone (16 0)7 3 4-15 2 6 .(Work) (Home) Fax C3 6 0),7 3 4- 65 18
Agent, if diffenent from applicant
,
Mailing Addr,ess- ~
City State Zip Code
Phone _ (Work) - - (Home) Fax
ProjecUproposal site area (acres or sq. ft.) 2'2_4, 10 2 S.-F. 5. 5 9_ A C
AdJacentzrea owned or cont'rofied (acres or sq. ft..) NONE
Assessors pan;el:#(s) of projecUproposal 35141.210,84 . 2109'
Assessor's paroel #(s):af adjacent,area owned or controiled N ONE
' Stroeet-address of proposal SOUTH OF N. 1101 FANCHER = WEST OF E. 5821 BROADWAY
Exlsdng zone classificaflon(s) and date established 1- 3E S T 1/1 / 91) - '
Existlnguseofpr+operty VACANT LAND / TEMPORARY' PARKING
Proposed zoning I= 2 -
. Comprehensive plan category I N D U S T R I A L Schooi district # 8_l.
Waterpurveyor CITY° OF 'SPOKANE Firedistrict_ COUNTY #1
Proposed use of property:
Single family dwellings Duplexes Muftifamily dwellings
Manufachued homes Business a~ Industrial Mixed use (XpX .
Otlher O- Descdbe WAREHOUSE AND SALE QF ~RE T'AURANT S iPPi.T FS AND
I NDU$TR IAL I-N FUTUItE
Ltst previous planning dfviston acUons invotving thls property B=1 (3 2- 9_`3 C)
• 1 _
1 r
- ZONE RECL-ASSIFICATION APPLICATION ' - PAGE 2 of 5
Address and Location of proposal LOCATED ON FANCHER_ AND BR,OADWAY ADJACENT AND
WEST OF E. 5,821 BROADWAY; SOUTH OF -N. '1141 FAMHER
Secdon _ 14 Township- 2 5 Range 43
-
Name of pubiiclprivate road(s) providing access F A N C H E R R 0 A-D A N D B R 0 A D W A Y A VE N U. E
- Width of property fronfing on public/private road 587 F T., 0 N F A N C RE R R 0 A D- 195 F T. 0 N
BROAD,WAY AVENUE,
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arteriai? Yes?( 7D No
Name(s),of arterial roads r'A N C H E R R 0 A D A N D, B R 0 A D W A Y A V. E N U E,' ~
Legai description af property for each zone reclassification proposed
SEE ATTACHED{ - COU.NTY A-SSESSOR-S
Existing zone(s) - 1-3 to proposed zone(s) 1-2
,for the following described property:
(Athach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below.)
SEE' ATTACHED
. If you do not hotd title to the property, what'is youe interest irf it?
What are the changed conditlons of dhe areao which you feet make this'proposal warranted?- -
GREAT ACCES'S DUE 70 NEW ROADS, F,REEWAY ,UP'GRADE - ALL INFRASTRUCTURE.
A,ND S,ERVI'C~-S AVAILABLE TO THE PROPERTY
. • -
~ ZONE RECIASSIFICATION ANPLICATION* • . •
PaGE 3 of 5
Wliat factors support the zone,reclassification?
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Y,E'S - U N T I L R E N T A A N G E I N Z 0 N E
USAGE MADE REZ,ONE N;ECkSSARY.,
Compliance with purpose and iritent of-aoning Y E S
DescripUon,of changed conditions of the area that-you'feel make this proposal warranted'_
NEW BROWTH 111 AREA - UPGRA-DED TRA,FFICE- FLOW ON ALL ROAD,S - 1VEW
SEWER' - S'ERVICES '
1Nhat'impact will the proposed zone reclassification fiave on the adjacent-properties?
SHOULD INCREASE THE VALUE D.U,E TO NEW CON;STRUC.TION AND USE
` What measures do you propose to, midgate your proposai's impact on surrounding land use?
THERC'SHOULD BE ONLY POSITIVE EFFECTS.
PART II
FiRE AflARSHALL / FIRE OISTRICT
RCW 36.70 B requi'res early*ooordlnatlon end Informaflon •
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS"1MTHIN FIRE PROTECTION 01STRICT NO. ~
B. WHAT IMPROVEMENTS NEED TO BE-fNiADE TO IVIEET THE DISTRICTS FIRE PROTECTION
REQUIREMENTS?
C. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED:
D. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW (gallons per minute): 78b
1 have vl ed the proposal and heve advised bhe appllcanr of Ghe FIre Olstrfct requiremenls.
/ SIGNATURE TITLE D'ATE
r • •
I
~ ZONE-RECL'ASSIFICATION-APPLICATION • . •
- PAGE 4 Of 5
WATER PURVEYOR
RCW 3fi.70 B requires eaiiy ooordinaflon and information
A. THIS PROPOSAL IS WITHIN~ WATER DISTRICT:,Ci; oCZW ICA t+, A_
B. SATISFACTORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR DOMESTIC W TER AND FIRE FLOW HAVE-BEEN
MADE AS FOLLOWS: A WATER SYSTEM PLAN MUST BE PREPARED: YES ) NO
REQUIREMENTS: OW _ Pi-ax1
C. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED:
1 hav r~eviewed 4SNOATUIRE "posal and have ad'vised the,app `cant of the Dlstricr r+equinements.
- ~
TITL' E OA E
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEAL'T'H DiSTRICT
RCW 36.70 B requires eaily coordinabon and irrtormation
A PRELIMINAFtY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COMPLETE APPLICATION IUIUST
INCLUDE: '
4.10000-
13. SEE ATTACHED LETTER DATED:
After a preliinJnary roview, of the proposal, thave advfsed the applfcant of some of the
Spokene Reglonal Hea/th requiremenfs. A' complere and detailed review will be provfded after tfie
epplicatlon is subin' whlch w1U riesult !n a complei~e llst of r8quirements and condifions negarding
Health provision or the proposal. _
Z7/
~ SIGNATURE ` - TITLE OATE
SEWER P4lRVEYOR
(Cjty. of Spokane or Liberty Lake)
RCW 36.70 B requires eariy cooniinatlon and information
A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION HAS TAKEN PLACE, A COMPLETE APPLICATION MUST
INCLU,DE:
B. SEE AITACHED' LETTER DATED:
Aftr a preliminary r,review of the proposal, I heve advlsed the, applicant of some of the
Sewer requ!rement$. A aomplet+e and detailed nevlew wlIl be prirovided after the application - is
submltted, whfch wiil ►esult in' a vomplete list of requlrements nc~c,ond' ons regarrling'Sewer provislons
c~
tor the proposal. ; ~
. ~
~
GSIGI~lATURE ITL DA
. .
. . , ,
'
~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ArPLICATION . , .
PaaE 5 of 5
SURVEYOR VERIFICATION
4 the undersigned, a,licensed land surveyor, have completed, the information requested, for the zoning
tnap and writteri legal,description
Signed Q_ Date < <
Address l.V • 11 O~o.~-a_l d o -c.. Phone 32 Z-~~ 9 7
City o~cav~g St2te WA' Zip 'to I
PART III
—SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETTER OF AUTHOR17AT10N
I, the undersigned, swear or affrm under penaity of perjury Uhat the above-responses are made truthfully
-and to ttie.bestof my knowledge.
I further swear or afflRn that•I am fhe owner of-record of the anea proposed for the previously identlfied
land use action, or, if not the:owner, attached herewith is written permission from the,owner authorizing
my actions o is/her behalf.
Signed, Date
Address 4 49ov Phone
city srate t~~v Zip 9N z_aG
ooe7 - - i-~-~~ di
~
Signature of Applicant o Representative Date
State of Washington )
) ss:
County of, Spokane )
' ,0~
Signed and swom or effi ed re me _ on this ~ day of t 2880.
by
- i -
No M J. AIVDERSOiV
I:N,OTAR Y~ PU BLIC Notary P ic n-nd fo e State of Washington residing
ATE OF WASHINGTON at NIIV~ISSION EXPIRES -
JUNE 9. 2004 Niy,appointment expires
PART IV TO 8E COMPLETED 8Y THE OMSION OF PLANNINC3 '
.
Oate submitted File number
Date acxepted By -
Total fees Receipt number
. ° .
• , •
, . . .
~35141.21~Ot3
Faot Sh~+o4 fot P'ro~r4y Pdumber
pata As of 111312001
SRe Addross 384 ICa 0a30 Pnreel8blv3 AcB++e
,
pwRO/ NFiY00. fNC. Taxpayer NEVCO. INC. •
,~Jo
a or HARBORMN.L ht5 •
-
Oynner MARBnR MALL atS ToxpY
AddiesA BEU.[NQWIk WA 98226 Aifdro4s eEILINMiAM. WA 0872g
,
;Maiket Yekles 71101 /bt~oqe ~en0 STa.300 EKen+pt 0
t,and 84 Faet 224.102 0 Yelue
Impvmte
pereonnt 0
PropO~ da~v c:oQO 99 Y6c~t Land Total vatue 672,300 Prope+ty
,
I ExempHon YeBt. . . 11c41vP Examrttnrta ' r ' + (
- -
iLege1 Dii"ScripUon - _ - - -
Igbc6on It rOwnship ?'i Ran96- 03. .1 OVYN UF YE/1DLEY, ZTS 1 THRU 7, 8LK 14 fiOGEf HER Wt VnC ALLEY LYG N
;OP 8 AQ1 TO 8A LTS 8 VAC C41 A' AVP LYQ, S aF 8 AUJ, TO SD LT$.14GE1NER Wt l-r'$ 1 11iRU T, OUt t'8•
IVAC ytAlLC1N AVE, 8 OF & AD1 TO,SD lTS, N.SO LT818?HRU 24. 6LK 7 6 VAC I1U.EY 3 OF & AOJ TO' SOLTg a >
LTS 1,6.t7 8 1R 8LK8 d WlC ALL6Y AOJ TO 80 LT8 8 N 34 t'r OF l?S, 21 TFIRV,24'. 81K,8,b N 34 PT Of E 112_OF
LT 20, 8LK,8 ER~ P1N LYa E a S 0r lN DAF;,9E0 AT PT nN E LN OF lT I,. BLK14 F3t1G 81.33 FT N tN SE C(lFt :_1 1'8 gN3 7R1~ t'(7L1; TH`~Y TO,PT ?a FT W;OF E LN RLK 7 b't A,8' 428 tn F~' SI.Y 10F I?09, rW s i On r5a Fr w -
(pr'C;LrIWGNER a0-$ 90.18 f T N OP,C!!. BROADWAY AVE; 1F1 gtv].Y lU~T 89 FT WLY OF CA FAPICNER.4VE b
(S0 FT N OF CA BROAOWAY AV@:TH 9WLY TA PT9d 1P8 Ft %'V UF CA. PA(JCN6R,RO &43.51 F'T 1!1 LN' C1L OF
eaoAOwa'v AW; TM WLY TO PT 124.23 FT W OF CR._F11NG~IER~R1:~& 39.90 FT N OF,C/L /~R!~AOWAY AVE; TH {
• 'hLY,J96.gA FT TO PTt1rN 1~v LN :T 9. 01K'8. SU P,T 9NC 3~ 06 FT N C`i' C/l_ 9ROADWAY AVE 8 TERMINU9 OF LN !
' OEBG, TOOETHER V{il 1 HAT PTN OF VAC ALLEY WIIMN 8LK 81►pJ SO LTS.. ~
- ~ ~~`•1~~ '
Repat9 ~E~t ~
. '
Fact Bhest for Prapetty. Nuenber t36141.210
DeQa As oP 11/3/2001
Slto Address a2~EE 1vWWiFfe R9 TCA C?a3U PstCS18b1ua Ac9vo
Clwntr NEVCOINC T=payQ►• NE1tiU.INC.
, do
pwner HAItBOR M~LL STE18 Taxpayer NAR90I R I~WWL,L #Ig
Addresa 8~1..tNGHRM, WA p8~28 Addroa8 8E1lINGFwM. WA 98729
Merket vatues zuat
~end 72,000 EKCmpI 0 L6.4 94 Feet 19.200 Vatue
mpvmt9 0
PrbPeltp peSa tJob 29 Vecanl land PerBOrol 0
~~otal ~'~luo 72,000 Piopetly
. . . _ . _ . , w. . ~
I Ei'oi~pqen Year_ _ Actlve exempllnns
_ • . Legal pescript9on - -
SeoLon,ld Tow«h?p 25 RanAA 43. TpYViV UF YEMI.EY, LT5.5.6 :9 620, 81K,6 EXC, i'TN Of lTS S 9 20, Bl.k 8!YO
E Of LN DAP; 0EQ'AT $E c:OR Or l1;'1. 8lK 8: TI'~ N 89'A~;07'1N205..18 Ff'ro TaU~ r08; Tl IN 00'01'05":N TO N
lN AF Rn 9LK 8 ANd 1 EpMINUg_OF 1.N DESC, AND EXC OEEDED I'TN 10 St'UKI+NE CO'fAR RD l1'e 3 OF l1V
AAP; FiEG AT Q PI lYU,124.23 FT W dF C~ FANdJER ttD NJD 39,50 FT N Oi'"C11 Ct' BROAOWAY AVE. TH wLY
396:59 FT TO PT ON W LN 0r-LT 9, 9lK @. 80 P* ONG 3T.OS,FT N OF C4L OP BROAVWA7 AI. TOQEI tiFR W/
,VAc AU,EYLYG BETINEEN SD LTB. • _ _ -
r-- _
. ~
Z E
0
RECEIVED
SPOKAPVE COUNTY
N 0 11 0? ?0 0 1
- dtvtsraN OF PLARNING
_Ll NV--
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANClE
SECTION i 1.1o.23U-1^
1
4 ~
< 4
SEPA ENVIRONMEIVTAL CHECxLIsT
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane Environmental Orclinance Secuon 11 10 230(1)
13URPOSE OF CHECKLIST
The State EnvYronmental Pohcy Act (SEPA), chapcer 43 21C RCW, requires al1 governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decasions An environmental
unpacc stacement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals ivuh probable signific2111adverse impaets on
the quatity of tbe environmenL The purpose of rhis checkhst is to provxde informau.on to help you
and the agency identify impacL trom your proposal (and to reduce or avoid unpacu from the proposal,
if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
ItVS'TRUC?'IONS FOR APPLICANTS
Tlus environmencal checkLst asks you to describe some basic uiformauon about your proposal
Governmental agencies use this checkLst co determine whether the environmental impacrs or your
proposal are sigmf'ican.t, reqwnng preparatlon of an EIS Answer the quesc,ons bnefly, w,ch rhe xnost
precL.se -information known, or give the besc descnption you can
You must answer each question accurateYy and carefull}r, to the besc of your knowledge In mosz
cases, you should be able to answer the quesuons from your own observations or proJecc plans
without che need to hu-e experes If you rmlly do not lcnow the answer, or if a quesuon does not
apply to -your proposal, wnte °do nat know" or "does not apply" Complete answers co the que.nions
now may avold unnecessary delays later
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, svch as zoiung, shoreline, a.nd landmark
designarions Answer these quesuon lf you can If you have problems, the governmenral agencres can
assLst you
The checklist quesuons apply to all pares of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period
of tune or on different parcels of land Attach any addiuvaal anformation that will help describe your
proposal or ;cs enviranmencal effeccs The agency to which you submtt rhis checklLsr may- ask yau to
explai.a your answers or provide addirional m.forrnauon reasonably related to determining if chere may
be significant adverse Lnpact
USE Qr CHECKLISS FOR IaION-1'RO7ECTPROPOSALS
Complete thss checkllst for non-pro)ect proposals, even though questions inay be answered "does not
apply " IlN r1DDtTIOy, complete the SUPPI.LMEN'I'AL SI-IEET F4R NOV-PROJECT ACTIp-\S (part D)
For non-pro)ect acnons, the references in rhe checkbst to r-he words "pro)ect," "applicant," -and
"property or sice" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectlvely
Spokane Finvironmencal4rdinance ChecklLst Page 2 of 21
r
1 l
• t •
~
A BACKGROUND FU-E/PRO,JECr No
1 Name of proposed proJect, if apphcable
3
,
2 Name of applicant
3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person
tiaMR JJ,44 L - ~70 t re zff - A~~"
~79- -zf6 p014, 3 bo -734- IS2Cv
__C,e)N 74Z ~ ~e)~-v^41
-Y'*3iE G'XJ~ti10A6CXC e-b,
4~F 4*~7410
4 Date checklist prepared
I 1 /1 `7 1d/
5 Agency requesting checklist
e c~ kJL4 't Lt, ? -1 ^.l4;
6 Proposed tirrung or schedule (including phasing, if applicable)
4
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 3 of 21
~
E ~
. • {
A BACKGROUND (continued)
7 a Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal) If yes, explun
L~~ ~1~~ ~ •5~~~ /Ar7~
1
7:0,4-/ /.Aj 4~ ,
b Do you own or have options on land nearby or ad)acent to this proposal) If yes, explain
8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal
rT "I7F~ -S cS/ ~x461U/~ C)V4 ~':~•0✓l ~rI ~i~/l ~''id~
„5.dAVC r-(J,7 10 67
d~ L2''.~c! 42 Cf- `T .
9 Do you know whether apphcations are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposal' If yes, explain
~J'~ 71 c?A ' .
10 List any government approvals or permics that will be needed for your proposal, if knawn
~t~ ,~~~1e.~ ~~'1~-f ~i~(~
.~X 1 ~Y
,
p-;-
~
~ 0~~ c e-T!
Spokane Envlronmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21
r
1
~ •
A. BACKGROiJND (concinued)
11 Give a brief, complete descnption of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the sLZe of the proJect and
site There are several questions Iater in this checklist thaL ask you to descnbe certain aspects of your proposal
You do not need to repeat those answers on tius page
Al~
.~p,3,E S-T~+~ ~ ~•v.•,/ Zl, ~ o v ~ ~ ~
,
12 Location of the proposal Give sufficient informauon for a person to understand the precise locauon of your
proposed project, including a streeL address, if any, and section, township and range, if known If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal descnption,
site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably avaslable While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duphcate maps or detailed plans submitted with any perrrut
application related to this checklist
,B~~A~'~-~
~ f~//~~ ~~~'f C~~ 5~3°~/ -
13 Does the proposed action lie witlun the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)~ The General Sewer Servlce Area) The
Priority Sewer Service Area~ The City of SpokanO (See Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for
boundanes)
Spokane Environmenca.l Ordinance Checklist Page 5 of 21
~
t M
. ► . i
Evatuation For
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1 EARTH
a General description of the site (circle one) rflat),olling, hilly, steep slopes,
mountainous, other
b What is the steepest slope on the site (appro~umate percent slope)~
/(/o A-1t,
c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand 4 ravel eat,
muck)~ If you know the classificataon of agricultural soils, specify them an note any
prime farmland
IAIVO
d Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicirury)
If so, describe
1C1'~-~~ e Describe the purpose, rype and approximate quantities of any filling or graduig
proposed Indicate source of f1B~
?
f Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use) If so, generally
describe
~a
Spokane Environmencal Qrdinance Checklist Page 6 of 21
~
~ Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
g About what percent of the site will be covered with unpervious surfaces after pro)ect
construction (for eYample, asphalt or bujldings)~
~
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other unpatts to the earth, if any
X/0<-JC
2 AIR
a What rype of errussions to the air would result from the proposal (i e, dust,
automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the pro)ect
is completed) If any, generally describe and give approaumate quantities, if known
~ ~G7/a~ ~07 ~
-7'~+e~
d 'F' rWJ5 -L v 7 .
b Are there any off-site sources of ern.issions or odor that may affect your proposal)
If so, generally describe
i~
c Proposed measures to reduce or control errussions or other unpacts to air, if any
NO " e Tb c- -0/'i
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 7 of 21
~
t 6
• t'
Evaluatton For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
3 WATER
a Surface
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)) If yes, describe
type and provlde names If appropriate, state what stream or nver it flows into
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
descnbed waters) If yes, please describe and attach available plans
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed m or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected
Indicate the source of fdll matenal
~ O h-r~
4) Wi11 the proposal require surface water withdrawals or d.iversions~ Give a general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known
~~"(S
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain> If so, note location on the site
plan
1\1 0 .
Spokane Envlronmental Ordinance Checklist Page 8 of 21
) F
~ •
~ Evaluation For
rAgency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters) If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of cLscharge
~Ao
b Ground
1) Will groundwater be wiLhdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water)
Give general descripuon, purpose, and approxunate quanuties if known
~V
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from sepcic tanks or
other sanitary waste treatment facility Descnbe the general size of the system,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve
~ C- T 0a&_ a
3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the dssposal of sarutary waste,
installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including
systems such as those for the d.isposal of storm water or drauiage from floor dra~ns)
Describe the type of system, the amount of matenal to be disposed of through the
system and the types of materials hkely to be disposed of (including matenals which
may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire flghting
activities) I/Lc-- it/j-/-"J- -Z-,3 cD 49 'w1 % Ax I-r
a
Spokane Envxronmental Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21
I
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above-
ground or underground storage tanks~ If so, what types and quantities of matenals wdl
be stored)
5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any cherrucals
stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes
measures to keep cherrucals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and -)b(3))
~o~l~ .
c Water Runoff (including storm water)
1) Describe the source of xunoff (inclucLng storm water) and method of collection and
disposal, if any (include quantuies, if known) Where will this water flow? WM thus
water flow into other waters) If so, describe
V--4,1,j 4~ ~Z r
Cr 14J Cz~S a
2) Will any chenucals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or
leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system
discharging to surface or groundwater)
d
3} Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters) If so, generally describe
"qo
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 10 of 21
,
I '
.
~ Evaluation For
Agency Use Onty
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water unpacts, if
any (if the proposed action lies withm the AQuifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on
explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 36(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of chis
checklist) pet i.. K~ nMcr yG J 4E S ~*41b1; CV
r -
4 PLANTS
a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site
deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, ocher
evergreen tree fir, cedar, pine, other
shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil planu catcail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
other
water plants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
✓other types of vegetation
b What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altere&
c List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
-NI cz~~~ ,
d Proposed landscaping, use of native planu, or other
measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any
C-O ID EAS .
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 1 I of 21
r Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
$ ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continucd)
5 ANIMALS
a Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site
birds hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other .
mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
6 List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site
el~ .
c Is the site part of a mi.gration rout0 If so, eYplain
NO .
d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
6 ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a What ku-ids of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used
to meet the completed pro)ect's energy needs) Describe whether it will be used for
heating, manufacturing, etc
0, / DC:,.D 6'`,r ~-a 4?orJ-,e,-
~°.17'K Ao ~j I ~ -
b Nv`Uould your pro)ect affect the porential use of solar energy by ad)acent properties)
If so, generally describe
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21
r
y i
j • vki .
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
c What klnds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal)
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any
t'1o "v
7 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any environmental health hazards, including eYposure to toxic cbernlcals,
risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this
proposal) If so, descnbe
lo
1) Describe special emergency services that rrught be required
~ .
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental
health hazards, if any
l4 c:>
b Noise
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your pro)ect (for example
traffic, equipment, operation, other))
lAJ,
~
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the pro)ect
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example traffic, construction, operation,
other)) Indicate what hours noise would come from the site
i1t%.cLo4AA oscf--~ ~ 7, wrts iOat
Spokane Environrnental Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21
i 1
r Vq A ~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any
~J;D A--j 4F,
8 LAND AND SHORELIiNE USE
a What is the current use of the site and ad)acent properties~
V~A A-J 7
b Has the site been used for agriculture) If so, describe
c Describe any structures on the site
J~lpAJC .
d Will any scructures be demolished) If so, which)
~O
e What is the current zoning classification of the site)
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 14 of 21
r ~
. ~
y Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL FI.FMENTS (Continued)
f What is the current Comprehensive Plan designauon of the site)
g If applicable, what is the current shoreline masLer program destgnation of the site)
h Has any part of the site been classified as an "environrnentally sensitive" area?
If so, specify
i Appro-cmately how many people would reside or work in the completed project)
~ Approximately how many people would the completed project displace)
k Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any
~
1 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with eYisting and projected
land uses and plans, if any
[ ~ l~ H PA--i ~4'a i-
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 15 of 21
,
~ l
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
9 HOUSING Ki 0-T JACQP&fC.A' 6(,Cj
a Approximately how many units would be provided, if any~ Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing
A/114
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be elirrunated) Indicate whether high,
msddle, or low-income housing
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing unpacts, if any
.
10 AESTHETTCS
a What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas,
what is the principal exterior building material(s) propose&
•
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed)
~aA-1 C_
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any
Spokane Environmental Qrdinance Checklist Page 16 of 21
,
. .
~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
11 LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce) What time of day would it
mainly occur) o-T Lic`$ f~,.. S V,
LiWT ~ej gci1c.-P/s'•/4
d
b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views)
1'JD .
c What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal)
d Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any
12 RECREATI01v
a What designated and informal recreational opportuniues are in the lmmediate vicinity)
Qo
b Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses) If so, describe
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 17 of 21
a )
Evaluation For
A;ency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continucd)
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities tq be provided by the proJect or applicant, if any
gv
13 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a Are there any places or objects Lsted on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers, known to be on or next to the sitO If so, generally describe
b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific
or cultural importance known to be on or next to the sice
c Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any
~U -4~~
14 TRANSPORTATION
a Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access
to the existing street system Show on site plans, if any
I~ ~ ~ ~ ~4 ~ .
~acm 12
6 Is site currently served by public transiO If not, what is the appro-umate distance
to the nearest transit stop)
~ ~~~C- •
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklut Page 18 of 21
.
~ Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMEIITS (Continued)
c How many parking spaces would the compleced pro}ect havO How many would the
project eliminate~
V VE.
cA-) a c, r~ , ~~~7,~ ~v ,
d \Xlill the proposal require any new roads or streeu, or improvements to existing roads
or streets, not including driveways) If so, generally descnbe (indicate whether public
or pnvate)
.
e 'Wi11 the pro)ect use (or occur in the immediate vicinity o fl water, rail, or air
transportation) If so, generally descnbe
f How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project)
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur
~
-LP S ~ ~ D'd L/ -r ~ Avt
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transponacion impacts, if any
NO /I /4-~
15 PUBLIC SERVICES
a Would the proJect result Ln an increased need for public services (for example
fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)) If so, generally describe
Spokane Environmental 4rdinance Checklist Page 19 of 21
`
, ~ .T .
Evaluauon For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
b Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any
do "E q c~ t tqz
16 UTILITIES
a Circle utiliu urrently avallal~le at the site'~ectric~,c~~y iatural gas water efuse
>r, eptic system,
service, elephon , suutary se ot ~ier
~
b Describe the utihties that are proposed for the project, the utlhty providuig the
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the unrnediate vicinity
which rru~ght~bg tne~edec~ ~ ~
=G ~r~~~
c~ ~ # ~1-r
c)
C SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of
my knowledge I also understand that, should there be any willful nusrepresentatlon or willful lack of full d.isclosure
on my part, the aeencv may wlthdraw any determination of non-significance that it irught issue in reliance upon this
checklist
Date ~o
AI.4
ProPonent Propone
.~Y
(Please type or pnnt) (Signature)
Address ~°7 C)U itoX 44ACtIC City, State, Zip :~~4k4/cr AW
Phone V ~ ~ + ~ ~ • ~
Person completing the form v Date ~
Phone q~'q
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 20 of 21
.
r ~ ♦ ,,,i
~
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff
A Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a
deterrrunauon of nonsignificance (DNS)
B Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current
proposal and recommends a rnicigated determination of nonsignificance with condiuons NDNS)
C Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends
a deterrrunation of significance (DS)
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILIiNG FEE
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 21 of 21
r
~►5~.~'~~' W~ NE~„ACm,~1; - 11~I.I~T~Y~~~~~VIS~IU~N~rO.~~~BU1~~~DING,z~~~
K
~ A ~ ~ 4 S ~ ~ ~ CODE h ~ ► U°RC`E~ ~ ~EN~T~.~ ~ ~ Y~ ~
~ IQ26 ' ° Es~~B o r~'~ wA Ar~r~ru~ ~ • :,po y ~s ~ ~WA09,260-0050~
. ,
2"T,I
Site information Project information ~
Site Address 0 E NO SITUS KNOWN 3 ST Project Number 01010482 Inv 1 Issue Date
SPOKANE, WA 00000 Permit Use ZE-24-01
Parcel Nnmber 35141 2108 E
SubcLvision LTNIQIOWN Apphcant NEVCO, INC
Block Lot HARBOR MA.LL #15
Zonmg I-3 Heavy Industrlal BELLINGHAM, WA 98225 Phone (000) 000-0000
Contact SAM CAMPPBELL
Owner NEVCO, INC 9300 E SPRAGtTE
Address HARBOR MALL #15 SPOKANE, WA 99206 Pbone (509) 924-9547
BELLINGHAM, DVA 98225
Setbacks - FYont Left Right Rear
Building Inspector BARRY H[JSFLOEN
Water Dist
Group Name
Project Name
Permits Zone ChanQe Contractor I,icense # •
W,G I VI ~~t~~ ENVIItONMENTAL REVIEW $75 00
REZONE TO I 1, I-2, I-3 6 $2,667 00 PRE-APP CONFERENCE $58 00
UTILTTIES REVILW $100 00
' - = Total Permit Fee $3,100 00
Payment Summary
Total Fees AmountPaid AmountOwmg Trnn Date Recei t~# Pavment Amt
$3,100 00 $3,100 00 $0 00 l lpl9/Ol 9507 $3,100 00
Processed By Buck, Marti PAYIVENT
Prmted By WENDEL, GLORIA Page 1 of 1
t'
~
9~ ~ F do
Spokane County
Public Works Department
Division of Building & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Number 9507 Customer Number
Pro ;ects
Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt --Owtng PAID Pnrt
01010482 1 $3,100 00-- $3,100-00 $3,100 00 $3,100 00 Sd
Total $31104 Op , I $3,100 0011 3,100,00 $3,100 00
Miscellaneous Items
Total PAID $3,100 00
Tender
Type -Cfteck, Acct _ Balance CC 1Vbr - ~'ExpDnte TENDERED
Check1 2301 3,10000
'Payer NEVCO, INC ,
Total TENDERED 3,10000
Over / (Short) $0 00
Cfiange $0 00
Notes
Tran Date / Time 11 /29/01 8 20 39 AM
By GWendel
Logon User gwendel
Statcon GWENDEL
Override By
Pranted I1129101 8 20 41 AM Page 1 of 1
;
I 0
I
stti a+3s se ~
f HU+xL aO "L---
R HO'AE RD C-li
A N 1s9'23" w L ~V
n~ ! A ~
^N r 9_~ - R A A 9 " tl ~ II ~11 d JO R
__SEC ~14 T 251 R43 E W M
~ I
--,----G 5+192I
33 ~ 1 I
Q7
w Z
~ Tti O+BDOD ~
<~~I
~ o !
i-05 Do
sta -sa+et 30 241 i~ I u e~ n i
I~ Nttt77
t ~ I
Y I~ IA. 36 9123 ~ I ' I I ~ I
3 l - I I m - --_J
sTti ozau 1 25
STA. 36+82.37 FANC!!FR a I ~ ~ ti~3i 0.70
STA. 10100 BROAOWAY EAST m I I~ S-IA, 77+3776 ' ~iA JO 6460 I I4 I
I
liry~ !I ~9 AI A A~ A AI S A P fl t A'
STA 38+4717 [MgIER
j ' - - - -
37)3
STA, IO+OD BROADWAY NEST A n A x p y ~ I
4107 50 Ft- ~ ~ p ~ by 39 1~ 40 7ir~ ~ ~ 47 n---
A
. I ~ R ~
tAttutwt ~ ~
u
R ~----`A tsa2sw FANp1EH RD ~
tj ~ .
~
P[_I~~s,,,,s ~ ~ I I
r~ I I
u ~ I I
~
~ p tl1 51A 38102' 11 I'" '°I
I I I I
u 22 iR 77~9 29 ;
8 ~ g
G Vp ~ I ~ ~ STA 16+20.11
N YE p\ lA 57 ~2737 Q
~ ail F OESAIET A1E
• ~ .w.oele
~ TA IO 65.59 W
~ .3,A 12+5594 i ~ STA 43C j0
~ I ~ END C R P 2398
I I
VE 'S
G~~~at~a a~ _ , naoca ao__ a i
AD
4' ' ~ , ! ~ ( I I
d 26 I I
~ I I
~ vt 16+a os ~ IC a I I
30~
~ -J QfI I ~ I I
a I- ~ o I I
r I i i Q I I
a I • r ~ d I I
om~ SE, 13 T 25N Et'j43 E W M
i ~
srA ie+os.u ~ - ----------J L-----
Q WfE RD
~ 4d5E BP
'R
~ , 0 LEGEND
PµCEI
~I 22 15~ zio2r i tisc uAa~iNE~E s' JJ'TOTAL AREA I R/W I RFMAINDER II CONST ES~IT I
° _ [ _ , 29.665.00 I 000 I 29_.66500 II 040 pusnxc W~T a' rAr uxcs - - - - - - - -
CUR4E TABIE 3 55l321025 f~_IIAUIIM~ iN ~ 3N,4W 76 1 O W I 34440476 009 VF~OSEO RIQIi OF WAT LINES
/ I, 35141.210t i,l~~. i 332.88585 I -LS BB j5 64~ 0 ~ ~~8~7~ 2 ~ dx~R9W UES CURVE 25 351411501 IM WG I 65.30395 4-31 I 85.071 PC7t~P 0
+ AAONS I TANGENi I IENCiH I OEL~A 18 35132~1028 I ANU~StlN~~Oj~l 1i5.009 O lTl b OU I 145,00900 N 0 DD
can~ucnmN caW, uuEs
47,7 33- 27.99~ 2`J~v 1 3Q~Q 1 7,7 N.A. I AIC~AI~CHl1N i agsie a5 I t12 18 I 36.805.97 11 1.145 75 CONS1RUCiqM PENIAI lR7C MMK[A uA°'
m
~ a ~u.a o rr I71& 24Z3`1p
7 69-56 1 -I
I I ~I
~1 42f.04 J¢.9,¢; i 738,1 7 vutCtt NvuBEa
0
+i}os' i_ l~,4a i 7 14 ar 2s370o- I FUTURE RIGHT OF WAY ACOUISITION TABLE ~
a i
~i 4587 s i 121.11' {2y5,86' 1_283700' i NAME ITOTAL AREA I R/W I REMAIN6ER II CONST ESMT
27 'I~ u~0iNF.240lS !tlG ~2e,oo ~,.ee4 33 i 27.77057~~ Y.A51 W ! C. Noq` ~py ~ Nf~fo
p6 ]5132 f07~SC AIACFIPIE TOOLS INC I 14~009 00 I 590 53 I 144.118 {rll 1.9h9 42
2 7 ~ ti
.r
(ILL' I/AYf C717Pfl9ApMG
z a e,~ e,ic /~OFO FUNRE R/1,4_AOQkT) ~AS~N,€{rT ON V,ViC. 4z ~ R" , ss, SCALE ~~~E CouNn COUNTY ROAD PROJECT No 2398 SHEET
~3/e/~z e~c ,m uovm QnoAowAr wcriuar soun+, DEP iME11T OF P BUC WORKS APPROVED APPROVED
/IS/9Y I 94ICI GW I,,M INEV PARC, 24 @ AgUED PARC. 27 OBi1~0 .bqEX I . ioo ~~+~NEERING couHn cw~n ~axA~ wws & aMrnAcr FANCHER ROAD RIGHT OF WAY PLAN
14MZONTAL 1028 V BROAOWAY A1L CM411Ebi
312 2 92 BJG GW :H I_~V PARG 22 R ADDED PARG 26 REV CURV No 54 k 5 '~+a ~ SPRAGUE AVE TO DESMET AVE
No o: e~ c~a ~4.~4LiF~' x-'-9i ytnnut N~ ~01~~~~~2°°'mro ~0.-2'--= ~ F~12/ys~H oot«i~ ~'~I~05n6JB~ T18 PROJECT No 9E-032(002)-1 ? Of?
7L01 DA E 1-28-94
nu rIPE vnTH atout
1/2 REflECfiE TAPE ~
II
If
I ' q
I ~
I ~
4 10 scHmULE eo sha aIPE
Hwr ar cuvAMtto
R/W sIr R/W i i
II
vAFbASLE +o' ro 54 ~ vNaAeLE w ro *15
~
; ELI
: s s 1 2 1 vun,~ a1 s m µ s vuRiAe~ ns ro,u as ca►~cacW raonNO I I I I YIRIA9IE 7.5 RT TO 18.5 LT ~ ROUND OR SOUME. ~
5 I <jb,. OWW 4. 1~ y1 ~
coMV~cnu1 1ocP m /11 ti cv a e 4 sAsc cou~ ~
~A'C'P a' A 011PAZiFD DEPTH CAYPACTED OEPhI R/W
FANCHER ROAD
STA. 10+00 TO 43+0170 " 4' I 0 BOLLARD
2
- ~
auu a SIonrwc
FOR 15 1 SLOPE AREA
(SEE PLAN) ecaN ame mu+sna+
ao amB airnR r soexAuc TRAxsnoN ro
CONaREIE vu,a amss aaaFL
PftccASr cONcaETE aoAo
PAI[15 (BY Ol}IERS)
StIRtiEY
.
R/W ~t R/W ~
.
YM11Bl£ SS i0 39 S I VhAIIBIf 30 lU 425
- - ii
t
2 I S.S I 2 VAPoABLE 25.5 TO SIS YMIABLE 21S Tf133 I I 55 2_ \
i
I 4AIdABIE I ~s
CFyytM t 2 TO 45
41 ~ 71
_ ~1E- .Z3.a s
x Al
1 1/2 tic.a a A /c.OMPACTED ~C.v a E /~MME couas~
coucAc~o ocrnH oErn+ oc~n+
BROADWAY AVE. CURB 1ftANSITION AT RR CROSSINC
STA 3+8418 TO 10+00
~py~~E~so
c+ ~
b.Uwa rx[ e+a. aaanc+n,a
a2 SCALE °""`a APPROVED COUNTY ROAD PROJECT No 2398 gHEET
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ,,,s & CO,,OXAI FANCHER ROAD
Ch"* a or 1~ A2 NOIh20HUL oNr w 102e BaMDwAr AVE
DICMM
fq'I i
w i oo~. eYl-I al~ c S"~i5°'' '~y= "°"c sPuc4u+c ~-s° wA. uoaeo ~s Si-.m-L°S i I 8 SPRACUE PROJECT AVE No TO 9E- DESMET AVE
032(002)-1 --of2z
P10T 9AtE e-18-91
a
. 4
~
.--Y
Q
0 14 - S~ $k 95 6~'
5+0 S 5 p
3
, A g2 6 RD
SZA `f 35~' 4 ER~
pW A TA CN
p A 1 5 AN
F
8R R~ ~7 p 36
~ p 57 35+64 +4~
A ~.A
~35oo
A~ ST F TA ST A
q+1 Vp~'~ON6*
35 [D Q+4
1 ,
7+7 a 1 3 42 4+10 17 LT S
2 TA WE ST
5SA A ~
I vE T D
/ s R
Kl A p,VE ER
A~ ~ NCH
It F A
~ ~ 30 i37
+52 AY
v o T S 1
~ ~ 3~ Dw
s51
o A OA
p 6
B , 3t 1+
0 5~ A 1 e Q+~
2 A
33+4s 32 EAS1
a
o ~ A A~
ST 55
•r M
M " o
'd M p2 92 ~
1
r-
~ t'~ SYA ~ ~ O
N 1
J ,
Y ► : 5
o 5,~ 8+210g 0
S1A 27+42 92 6
~ Z
~ t/!
C~ A 33 ~ p r t
301 50
7 +21 O
S1CJA 2 43 ~ ~ C-~~+~--~
YA 2~k P
~ i ~ J d1 N ~ ~ J'
34
, 1 3s
2 I O $ X
~,10 70 l aJro 2
~ ~ 33 o t
~ ~ r~ ~ q S i A 0
t34 5 N
p~
~ ~ n 32 2
► 4 1 ~
;
,.r ~ +6g
2c~ o 4
f r t
73 5 3 6 -A +9$ 96
4 23 .12 1
Z 'Q4 s 9 7 P~
N 5+~ c ~
4- 51'A 3 c~
5373 t ~
57 RT t A 35+ ~
S
3p .~9 p
5~
3~ r t
.T p, 35k$ !
44 s
~ , ~
8 2g.~9
t
S~P ~,9g 65 42
,s 1 TA ~5 ~
~ 2~k11 2g+9 S 9 a4
3 STA slA jo+a co , w
g 80 S~ A i
I 26+A+7A ~6 _ k03 543o S A ~A 2g ~Pc,1'A 11 ~ !
30 , 64 . S 3
24~3~ 3.~65 ~ 3~
TA ~a
~+12
Sp
AA 2
S
a~ ~ 4
ro
R2 $p pc-..
2~~'
51 WA'~ A~ ~
LEY ALKI
VAI- , r 14q 20
~ h
~k Y +Q3 2 .
1
Y
,J ao o
1S-TA A
w pW
4 n 0 ROA
N > B
T,
e
Y-; Q:
4 ~
~ r
Wr o 0
J~ o
J tp
Q
, ~ I
i e kTA 3+5910 LT
i
B L~ W R E I A 9 V A L O F E% I S i 1 N C S E C 1 4 T 2 5 N R 4 3 E W M
; e CuRB, h&w u+D eEpu
i ODNSTRIJCTiON Of SYPE 'B STA 8~90
~ -i~~o q1RB aNa-61QEw+UK. OOSIINC FENCE. AN(3f PT IN ~
' o / ~o 0 gF '~s cuaeWUic~~T ~ 24 I
~ ~ qTO MEET E~S11NC SII~IYAIJt
: - - ~ ' 27 ~ b
• o_"o: qo: o g o~ ~ o0 000
'4►"""'• REYOY£ fFNC£ TO fRWE e GtAKi / STA 8+7811 LT
S T A 3 h 8 4 18 U N E A E S T P O S T 10 irtAE Y
~ o ` i - - - - - - - - - - - /XR29LEANGINMUENT " ~
30 _ 6 u
~ _ -
~ ~ ry - lk _ _
°
~ d~.
~ -
a ~ . ~ + P s
N ~ ` REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT " " ~Z
n /
TO a f
~ g ROADWAY CROYM 6 49
_ Z--,- - - g - - g
~ isnNC A c.v 1 ~ l
~--ti - - - . -7`~ - - - - I -
BROADWAY AVE s e87225 w
~ ANGIF PT IN -•`~~1~- ~
STA 4+BS.BJ RT ~
~ CROYM UW- ~ ANGIF PT W CUR6 n~~
g Aucr+uE~t i^ Z AN
`
„ I u D~ - """"~JI----------""'-"""-$-- A----'~" -
- -
~ . .
~ ` ---r-'----
~`(•_~-e+ii ~ -__.a _ -3
- - - -
d~ W
~ ,._.T_ _ _ - _ • :t ~ 1^~ - ei
W
5
M'
\SLl 3i5428 RL ~ I - ' ,
- ---_-.J___---------m
SI~EWAUf ~
BECw REUOVAL aF TAP~ 9Adf OF
o
E)aSTING CURB R SW M°t FROA1 5' 0 STA 4+fiS83 TO STti B+95.89 N ~
A N 6 0 STA. H7S BS 1 \ 4~
ND BEp CONSiRUCT~ON ~ o
OF TYPE B CURB AND
9DEWAUC ~ + ~
a°
0
o~ t
u~ 1
) WO I
CAU
~
BEFORE YOU DIG
~ 2s t
456-8000 ~
~
ONE CALL NUMBER ~ SEC 14 T 25N R43 E W M '
48 HR NOTiCE REQUIRED ~
~
- - _ = ° i- - - -
1940
h - - - - - - - ' WR oF
ei
1935 935
~
~ ~
CUNB lT ' - - - _1 - _
-
- - - - - ^ k
19J0
~ -a- - - - _ _ ~ _
1940
~
~ ~ - • ~ - - 19]5
1930 1 ;
CROYm
-
m - - - - - - N
- = - - - -i-- ` - - - ' - -
1930
' - h
' - - _ - - - OF
- - - - - - k8~"k~f
1935 - - - ~ _ - - - - - - - _ - ---i-' 1935
a -
- _ _ - s - ~ - -
(OP Of m - E-0
1930
~
' ~ -
~ t
4 5 6 7 8 9 nt ~ro, caaavc~7awc
Q~SHEET
S~a~ 0i1C d APPR COUNTY ROAD PROJECT No 2398
~ a" 7~
o~.aer SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS ~gk~~ ~iaMtitt+~' FANCHER ROAD
I I I I I ae. G a,ng io-e sz Nqy~T,,y,a . so w tota eaoawar AVr-
I I I I I a»S asoN ~ OKANF `w~wzao ~ ~t ~ SPRAGUE AVE TO DESMET AVE ]~,of~Z
Na i oote i B. i OM i Mnr i a.,ir~ t1Y3 vtr+nca W~ `EMp~y T I B PROJECT No 9E - 032(002)-1
oiOT~D+tE 4-19 94