The URL can be used to link to this page

2015, 06-23 Formal Regular Meeting AGENDA SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FORMAL FORMAT MEETING Tuesday,June 23,2015 6:00 p.m. Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers 11707 E Sprague Avenue Council Requests Please Silence Your Cell Phones During Council Meeting CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION: Pastor Bill Dropko, Greenacres Christian Fellowship Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: Youth of the East Valley Community Coalition COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATION: Parks and Recreation Month PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.) When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. 1. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of vouchers on June 23,2015 Request for Council Action Form Totaling: $3,149.589.09 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending June 15,2015: $327,509.56 c.Approval of June 2,2016 Study Session Council Meeting Minutes d.Approval of June 9,2016 Formal Format Council Meeting Minutes e.Approval of June 10,2015 Special Council Meeting Minutes f.Approval of June 15,2015 Special Council Meeting Minutes NEW BUSINESS 2. Proposed Resolution 15-005 Adopting 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program— Steve Worley [public comment] 3.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Montgomery Ave St Preservation—Steve Worley [public comment] 4.Motion Consideration: Bid Award for Mansfield Avenue Connection Project#0156—Steve Worley [public comment] 5.Motion Consideration: JAG Grant Application -Morgan Koudelka [public comment] Council Agenda 06-23-15 Formal Format Meeting Page 1 of 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS: This is an opportunity for the public to speak on any subject except those on this agenda as action items. (Action items include public hearings, and those items under NEW BUSINESS. Public Comments will be taken on those items at the time those items are discussed.)When you come to the podium, please state your name and city residence for the record and limit remarks to three minutes. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 6. Bus Shelter Plan—Eric Guth 7.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos INFORMATION ONLY: 8. Department Reports CITY MANAGER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT General Meeting Schedule(meeting schedule is always subject to change) Regular Council meetings are generally held every Tuesday beginning at 6:00 p.m. The Formal meeting formats are generally held the 2° and 41 Tuesdays. Formal meeting have time allocated for general public comments as well as comments after each action item. The Study Session formats(the less formal meeting)are generally held the 3d and 5th Tuesdays. Study Session formats DO NOT have time allocated for general public comments;but if action items are included, comments are permitted after those specific action items. NOTICE: Individuals planning to attend the meeting who require special assistance to accommodate physical, hearing, or other impairments, please contact the City Clerk at (509) 921-1000 as soon as possible so that arrangements may be made. Council Agenda 06-23-15 Formal Format Meeting Page 2 of 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: [' consent ❑ old business [' new business [' public hearing [' information ® admin. report [' pending legislation [' executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: The Youth of the East Valley Community Coalition (EVCC) Present a "Photo Voice" Project BACKGROUND: Ms. Karrie Stewart, East Valley Community Coalition Chair and Project Coordinator with the Greater Spokane Substance Abuse Council, along with four youths from the East Valley community, will present a "Photo Voice" project to demonstrate the youths' gained awareness of the impact that advertising and product placement of alcohol and tobacco products have on youths' perceptions of substance use by minors. The group will explain their "Community Assessment of Neighborhood Stores" (CANS) survey, which they use to raise community awareness of the marketing trend strategies which actually negatively impact the well-being of community youth. The Washington State Community Assessment of Neighborhood Stores (CANS) survey was first done in 2009; the youth group will be using the updated 2014 version. The purpose of the CANS is: To educate retailers of the laws pertaining to tobacco and alcohol advertising and encourage them to adopt policies that discourage "mass" advertising, and to adopting policies to check identification of all people purchasing alcohol and tobacco, no matter the age; To identify targeted advertising and how much advertising is present in each neighborhood store; To contrast different advertising in different communities; and To identify whether there is a relationship between unhealthy youth behaviors and storefront advertising. Permission is obtained from each store they survey and feedback is given to the owners from the youth. They point out the things the store does well and also possible changes that could be made. They have conducted three or four store surveys already and had a very positive experience. The project ends with "Sticker Shock" where the adult in the group, with permission, places stickers on alcohol products to remind purchasers of the state statutes against providing these products to minors. The store owners are also given thank-you certificates for their participation. Ms. Stewart has explained tonight's presentation will be an extraordinary opportunity for these future leaders and an outstanding conclusion to hours of civic duty. OPTIONS: For information only RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None. Information only. STAFF CONTACT: ATTACHMENTS: PowerPoint Presentation The Youth of the East Valley Community Coalition The Youth of the East Valley Community 1 Coalitiei 1 1 ( ) _.A on a r e6 8 ts8 a 600 0411 . a CHym R? 40,*' 01°— ' ChOO5c •• • i ...• 1 ., . e ,, . . ..., • , 4... _ • 4.1ti ._.,..yam 1• .mss t+h Q Jf+' t • ' ru4 . __L. r • - S Ilk i (jP '17 .t,...,...,,,,,:12kiikl"._",...:.,,, ..,,,„•:,,-,: - ,-,..--.,..-irwi- 7$,_3'10lEeit--14..,i'0:-..04,- ,,,,or.„.... /.7:.... -Community Assessment of Neighborhood Stores- .. ----------. "7-, • .. ,'•, • ... IL 1 ''—.t"..:19, itiP• " "I'1,;:'' ' :1- . '' '. • . -• ' • ,„ .,L,Ljr, 'I, 1 :, •, ,..,r.lir GEN. '-‘••,- ,,. -4. .r NI ... • - :: A .1.44E,, 1,5Lt --, 1 "1-1.: s - — - — ' NV • _. me _...._ 1. 4 ... .. .... .....„ Jii... ... ___ - t . ,,,.., .1 P.. -- 41 711 1- .1.1.1 .. AEI . 4.41111'N' '' :* ,; IN .4i.... Li I N. VS • .-..r. csr- • ' • 1 . kg7- 1r , , \ ... •.._ ., i -,-(1111 • .. ' f . , ' ;;/4 \ \()•-\ •,.- it 17 1 . Our Goal Results 1 . Product Placement 2 . Product Packaging Similarities 3 . Unintentional Advertisement to Youth ProductPlacement ._ _ ___ _ \:. . _ = , i ...„, ,H., _ ______,_ _r___„_______„_______,.___= =_.__ __________ _ ___. ,,, il ,, .r. WI ±--' "I ,111 , 11111111111106 --s r , -, . - Vii' .. # �') IA rrlir .1 la 1 WI 17o 1: i "f 1:7 11-1,4;j,'1L - 11. -'ME i il 4 4 ; �,: l';'11 ' '1 1,.,11ffi" 1. ,, t=1 ® - - -IALill I'l itilliVbc. ProductPlacement rg 11, efil e 5 " �37 .— MONSTER N'� E R G v 1� No N fe �N ir N P ril f LH"1- Ili t: I ', olir: tam 1 11 0 f Nli# ., it iil I _ ,, , .., .1.fp Liiii.,1 y kA '` 'ii, , 1 7 , N1. } NS _ ' _ IPMNEK- N rI � ' - l- IL "r ti P� � � x im 5 } r1211-1 r••• car Ili . ' 1 - ..4 Illtl.Z.11. OWL,. _ _ .". i' : i. „1.,40 a till _ e .-,... .--,n, ....-,'. 1 t I 1 r R : LJ1I 33 1 t rt 1.11191. 1111.2 . . • 1 - i - 1.- -. : : . . g 1,.. ! & !ii :, �— ■ire ' � 4�t 'If A,oZ.,, .�.NN3.J I� .cam® . .__ al ,„, VIA II 111.101111104111.111111.11W , -. y ` Product Placement • . .k.,• _, : 1 , .. gi ... 1WE;,- ..... T 4 411111 I I: .-- - :.:• elat 111 1 .091 r 2'112.4c c ..- -- __ ......001111tili Unintentional AYouth ___________ ,,,, , ,, ,, . ..„„.,_r_r___ _______=_-, ", , _..„L. ._. . , . .,____ , ,iyv.,1\ Ail ii Ft 1 If l',---',. txrL-"4--i-4---k i-.-E-=-7 !K 'MI ®= -al= 'I:stir,. 7 - Mei Z.; s s - I 1�Y 1i iii ��iii , , is MAR NM 11111 111 al Ei ZIE 211 ME :111 0 ,,��'4iIIIII____i4! 7 f west m.#.-- . t- "kip 7 =`T.-- diry ,_"1 am 77".. ":',77" .� • Cal 1, 120,...a.„ It _r Unintentional Ayouth —1 • • KH� - ti.� • ,.y GROCERY4� - - a": "F. " _ MARKET - , II ICF k'14‘i6k. ) '� _ ;� �divas Advertising Youth Unintentional • • • C:` Yer ver'at • ‘11 VP • • r, kl)t rill.14 ' s 1-tett i r��, Ch E • • i V a' 'Y a t / • • A� / 4E7 ,t" .•. " Gxli. `..a; ', � 'g� We Az, l4 fix t^ `r 4 ,,, 0. s, lb 16g s11, ` ik . a ego- 4 ProductP k inSimilarities ac a____„. , ___ ..._„____,...1%,=____)„„ -....-...,, 1"ii it.) z - 0 _ ,.. .. 0 a . et. , ..evz, ,„,... T., . . .. 1 , , _......-7 --,...______________. i 4. iiiii 1 , ', 4 a .r 1 .Wri _ . „AI _G in .4 H lim 4 _ 2_ J J t F P 45 r All 11. :0' 192 oilrl , r• rt ! 4 t 1 ill fL ProductPackaging ITP3°'''' ___ / ,_,_ 7 ._ , li.\\:,. . N I. -4 ` + y 5 ,..,,, ,._400-' ci.' '''''''.1 , 4....-\..„4,,„--...,.„,,'"-1°1; ' •, 4 . „... , , . , ..„ Atti' i i : , - A <64e ` ► r ''''k'.,,...''‘' - : _ , . - , Product Packaging Similarities Conclusion ,....,-..„„,- q" '.-- , l' , , .i, — .,-,-r— / . v1/4 li .!‘111%, —"iiki; P\ , ., .., ,.., A 1 : 1 _ • L , . i 01 , III . t . 0 ;•. )i, \,,,..,v..,''''' ,.,1I, ,.\,",,,,:14.:..1o.,:;..,9,_ii., .‘,_._._i..,.,.,.i:,,,ii.._..:.,-,,,...7:.t.(7.,.,,,,,,,,L.'.1.,,•',,.:.,,,41,:;,,9,.t,',...,1,..-...I'...:::-.:r....171:-=.-..„::1_,.(,w,;:,,-:..:,":4,,_......'i,1,:!,_,_•.:Ittr,„11....1,-.:_."',','._' '_, .1",.,.,'''.;..::....,./7.2:7,_:1,-71:,',.',,•-..iii,l.:161,"\\:1,....",,,,_:,,,,,..1.....,,:.,....,,,,.,...,. .,,ii.,;‘f. a._jo. cA,,,ii, 11:k ..., 4 .. . :l ',., .1 ail.11111 id rh,. Cliiit e ' ‘ Plr ,1 .,, \ Ili ,.- .,- 1, . . _.......ta.. -..- IIW .- -4. . i II si ' ' • ' &. I I ----. . -.-. P e4...1.•41 Ii v_,, PT f : mazsial.: , mio , • • - -, . ''''L ' ' c- - ii _. , If ‘,. ;, 400`4111 -,-,„ _ —115 ) -12),,,, , -:' 4 . -, : ,416 '-''' ...'-^---- i'l' ' .. .... - • '1'.1 ' - "411 ' . , .,ari ',111 IliZA ngsali iitiu, Nam rim: 11/ 4/ — I i -, kiliF SC1 '' 1 ' ,',, 10°A • , • • OM- Is 4111116 1 ow '- NATURAL . s'k =, . ..44., 1 PAC5 . . . . . wow .5, ,:(.6 :: . -5I ;-,, ---' r. igivorr..- _- . .010111. - py- 9' ' '•• . k 4 •"- ,.e 't - ---. lilt C..°•: R-7.Ylillii r-i, '''-..`'L---''' '•••1....1111111' ,fit.,E,,g if or::0 i,,6:1 1.6,1 Questions ? CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: El Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business El new business El public hearing AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Approval of the Following Vouchers: VOUCHER LIST VOUCHER NUMBERS TOTAL AMOUNT 06/03/2015 35564-35569 $8,476.43 06/08/2015 5151; 5159-5162; 5171;35570-35571 $280,159.27 06/08/2015 35572-35609; 527150032; 529150033 $1,744,618.16 06/08/2015 6139-6147 $814.00 06/11/2015 35610-35632 $81,735.05 06/12/2015 35633-35699; 605150035 $1,032,233.18 06/12/2015 6148-6161 $1,553.00 GRAND TOTAL: $3,149.589.09 Explanation of Fund Numbers found on Voucher Lists #001 - General Fund Other Funds 001.011.000.511. City Council 101 —Street Fund 001.013.000.513. City Manager 103 —Paths&Trails 001.013.015.515. Legal 105—Hotel/Motel Tax 001.016.000. Public Safety 106—Solid Waste 001.018.013.513. Deputy City Manager 120-CenterPlace Operating Reserve 001.018.014.514. Finance 121—Service Level Stabilization Reserve 001.018.016.518. Human Resources 122—Winter Weather Reserve 001.032.000. Public Works 123—Civil Facilities Replacement 001.058.050.558. CED-Administration 204—Debt Service 001.058.051.558. CED—Economic Development 301 —REET 1 Capital Projects 001.058.055.558. CED—Development Services-Engineering 302- REET 2 Capital Projects 001.058.056.558. CED—Development Services-Planning 303 —Street Capital Projects 001.058.057.558 CED—Building 309—Parks Capital Grants 001.076.000.576. Parks&Rec—Administration 310—Civic Bldg Capital Projects 001.076.300.576. Parks&Rec-Maintenance 311 —Pavement Preservation 001.076301.571. Parks &Rec-Recreation 312—Capital Reserve 001.076.302.576. Parks &Rec-Aquatics 402—Stormwater Management 001.076.304.575. Parks &Rec- Senior Center 403—Aquifer Protection Area 001.076.305.571. Parks& Rec-CenterPlace 501 —Equipment Rental&Replacement 001.090.000.511. General Gov't-Council related 502—Risk Management 001.090.000.514. General Gov't-Finance related 001.090.000.517. General Gov't-Employee supply 001.090.000.518. General Gov't-Centralized Services 001.090.000.519. General Gov't-Other Services 001.090.000.540. General Gov't-Transportation 001.090.000.550. General Gov't-Natural&Economic 001.090.000.560. General Gov't-Social Services 001.090.000.594. General Gov't-Capital Outlay 001.090.000.595. General Gov't-Pavement Preservation RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve attached list of claim vouchers. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Mark Calhoun, Deputy City Manager ATTACHMENTS: Voucher Lists vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/03/2015 12:27:10PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35564 6/3/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8573 May 2015 001.013.000.513 COLUMBIA BOOKS 199.00 8573 May 2015 001.016.000.521 HEWLETT PACKARD CO 1,340.26 8573 May 2015 001.018.016.518 SHRM 190.00 8573 May 2015 001.018.013.513 A TO Z RENTAL 326.10 8573 May 2015 001.018.013.513 A TO Z RENTAL 54.35 Total : 2,109.71 35565 6/3/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8565 May 2015 101.042.000.543 AMAZON 359.99 8565 May 2015 001.018.014.514 THE HUMAN SOLUTION 469.00 8565 May 2015 001.090.000.518 MAILBOX CENTER 91.08 8565 May 2015 001.090.000.594 BEST BUY 902.19 8565 May 2015 001.090.000.594 B&H PHOTO 589.80 Total : 2,412.06 35566 6/3/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8599 May 2015 001.076.304.575 GONZAGA UNIVERSITY 30.00 8599 May 2015 001.076.305.575 ZHANGLE1223 36.33 8599 May 2015 001.076.305.575 AMAZON 30.47 8599 May 2015 001.076.304.575 OFFICE DEPOT 183.14 8599 May 2015 001.076.304.575 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 149.00 8599 May 2015 001.076.305.575 ORIENTAL TRADING CO 32.74 8599 May 2015 001.076.305.575 COURTYARD MARIOTT 250.44 8599 May 2015 001.076.305.575 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS 149.00 8599 May 2015 001.076.000.576 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES 352.00 8599 May 2015 001.076.000.576 NRPA 545.00 8599 May 2015 001.076.000.576 NRPA HOUSING 155.68 8599 May 2015 001.076.305.575 BEST BUY 54.34 Total : 1,968.14 35567 6/3/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8557 May 2015 001.011.000.511 ASSOCIATION OF WA CITIES 375.00 8557 May 2015 001.011.000.511 ASSOCITATION OF WA CITIES 375.00 8557 May 2015 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP 35.00 8557 May 2015 001.018.014.514 CUPPA JOE'S CAFE 141.79 8557 May 2015 001.011.000.511 GREATER SPOKANE VALLEY CHAP 10.00 Total : 936.79 Page: 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/03/2015 12:27:10PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35568 6/3/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 8581 May 2015 001.058.057.558 ENZIAN INN LEAVENWORTH 233.94 8581 May 2015 001.058.056.558 PIZZA RITA 39.11 8581 May 2015 001.058.056.524 THE HOME DEPOT 86.92 8581 May 2015 001.058.057.558 WABO, INC 95.00 8581 May 2015 001.058.051.558 INLAND NORTHWEST PARTNERS 80.00 8581 May 2015 001.058.057.558 HAWTHORN SUITES 111.28 8581 May 2015 001.058.057.558 HERMOSA-DESIGN.COM 150.00 8581 May 2015 001.058.050.558 BANNER BANK 21.28 Total : 817.53 35569 6/3/2015 001606 BANNER BANK 5214 May 2015 001.032.000.543 ALASKA AIRLINES 232.20 Total : 232.20 6 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 8,476.43 6 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 8,476.43 Page: 2 vchlist Voucher List Page: f9/ 06/08/2015 10:10:47AM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 5151 6/5/2015 000165 DEPT OF RETIREMENT SYSTEMS Ben61180 303.231.15.00 PERS:PAYMENT 76,617.09 Total: 76,617.09 5159 6/5/2015 000048 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A PLAN Ben61182 311.231.14.00 401A:PAYMENT 31,665.90 Total: 31,665.90 5160 6/5/2015 000145 VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS,457 PLS Ben61184 001.231.18.00 457 DEFERRED COMPENSATION:PAYI 7,682.55 Total: 7,682.55 5161 6/5/2015 000682 EFTPS Ben61186 001.231.13.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 33,915.72 Total: 33,915.72 5162 6/5/2015 000162 VANTAGE TRANSFER AGENTS,401A EXEC PL Ben61188 001.231.14.00 401 EXEC PLAN:PAYMENT 1,441.96 Total: 1,441.96 5171 6/5/2015 000682 EFTPS Ben61192 001.231.11.00 FEDERAL TAXES:PAYMENT 963.57 Total: 963.57 35570 6/5/2015 000120 AWC Ben61176 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS:PAYMENT 114,814.99 Ben61190 001.231.16.00 HEALTH PLANS(COUNCIL):PAYMENT 10,708.99 Total: 125,523.98 35571 6/5/2015 000699 WA COUNCIL CO/CITY EMPLOYEES Ben61178 001.231.21.00 UNION DUES:PAYMENT 2,348.50 Total: 2,348.50 8 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total: 280,159.27 8 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers: 280,159.27 Page: vchlist Voucher List Page: el 06/08/2015 4:03:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Deet Description/Account Amount 35572 6/8/2015 000234 ARLT,SHANE Q2 2015 101.042.000.542 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35573 6/8/2015 003588 BATES, BILL Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35574 6/8/2015 004231 BELSBY ENGINEERING 15192 001.058.055.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,710.00 Total : 2,710.00 35575 6/8/2015 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG Q2 2015 001.018.014.514 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35576 6/8/2015 000904 BRANCH,CAROLBELLE Q2 2015 001.018.013.513 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35577 6/8/2015 003122 CALHOUN, MARK Q2 2015 001.018.013.513 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35578 6/8/2015 000322 CENTURYLINK MAY 2015 001.076.000.576 2015 PHONE SVCS:ACCT 509 Z14- 493.17 Total : 493.17 35579 6/8/2015 004132 COBBLESTONE CATERING&EVENTS 75 001.058.050.558 CATERING FOR CD MEETING 187.56 Total : 187.56 35580 6/8/2015 001888 COMCAST JUNE 2015 001.090.000.518 INTERNET SERVICE CITY HALL 143.03 Total : 143.03 35581 6/8/2015 000508 CONOCOPHILLIPS FLEET 41060545 001.018.014.514 MAY 2015: FLEET FUEL BILL 1,795.82 Total : 1,795.82 35582 6/8/2015 000235 DB SECURE SHRED 2721052615 001.090.000.518 DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION CITY I- 154.50 Total : 154.50 35583 6/8/2015 002236 DEPT OF COMMERCE AUGUST 2015 001.058.051.558 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUR 950.00 Total : 950.00 35584 6/8/2015 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST APRIL 2015 001.076.305.575 ADVERTISING FOR CENTERPLACE 225.25 Page: ✓I— vchlist Voucher List Page: ---Z 06/08/2015 4:03:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35584 6/8/2015 000912 DEX MEDIA WEST (Continued) MAY 2015 001.076.304.575 ADVERTISING FOR SENIOR CENTS 40.00 Total : 265.25 35585 6/8/2015 000278 DRISKELL, CARY EXPENSE 001.013.015.515 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1,585.25 Total : 1,585.25 35586 6/8/2015 001926 FARR,SARAH EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 88.55 Total : 88.55 35587 6/8/2015 001447 FREE PRESS PUBLISHING INC 43815 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 267.20 43821 001.058.056.558 LEGAL PUBLICATION 105.40 Total : 372.60 35588 6/8/2015 002975 FREEDOM SALES AND SUPPLY LLC 2015390 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 15.33 Total : 15.33 35589 6/8/2015 004325 FRONTIER TREE SERVICE APRIL 2015 303.000.206.595 TREE REMOVAL 1,168.52 Total : 1,168.52 35590 6/8/2015 002235 GRAFOS, DEAN EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 17.25 Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 152.25 35591 6/8/2015 003177 GUTH, ERIC EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 38.10 Q2 2015 001.032.000.543 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 173.10 35592 6/8/2015 002682 HAFNER, CHARLES Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35593 6/8/2015 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35594 6/8/2015 000265 JACKSON, MIKE JUNE 2015 001.013.000.513 AUTO ALLOWANCE 300.00 Q2 2015 001.013.000.513 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 435.00 Page: ...,2.-/ vchlist Voucher List Page: -8'- 06/08/2015 4:03:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35595 6/8/2015 001944 LANCER LTD 0452881 001.058.057.558 BUSINESS CARDS 76.91 0452976 001.013.015.515 BUSINESS CARDS 61.42 Total : 138.33 35596 6/8/2015 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 87699 001.058.055.558 SUPPLIES: CD 34.95 Total : 34.95 35597 6/8/2015 000239 NORTHWEST BUSINESS STAMP INC. 94717 001.018.016.518 SLOTTED NAME BADGE 39.68 Total : 39.68 35598 6/8/2015 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 772526956001 001.076.301.571 SUPPLIES: PARKS 168.75 772527087001 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES: PARKS 2.49 772527088001 001.076.300.576 SUPPLIES: PARKS 16.63 Total : 187.87 35599 6/8/2015 003587 PACE, ED Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35600 6/8/2015 001604 PACIFIC NW PAPER 160607 001.090.000.519 PAPER FOR GENERAL USE 1,650.07 Total : 1,650.07 35601 6/8/2015 000675 RAMAX PRINTING&AWARDS INC 26916 001.032.000.543 NAME BADGE 31.79 26927 001.058.056.558 NAME PLATE 16.85 Total : 48.64 35602 6/8/2015 000031 ROYAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS IN27226 001.058.057.558 MAY2015 COPIER COSTS 1,559.68 Total : 1,559.68 35603 6/8/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 42000144 001.016.000.554 JUNE 2015 AMINAL CONTROL SER 20,435.67 Total : 20,435.67 35604 6/8/2015 000065 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 3265179759 001.058.055.558 SUPPLES: CD 74.45 3265179760 001.058.055.558 SUPPLES: CD 73.89 3265179761 001.058.055.558 SUPPLES: CD 230.92 3265179762 001.058.055.558 SUPPLES:CD 17.37 3265179763 001.058.055.558 SUPPLES: CD 137.85 Total : 534.48 Page: �3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 7,-4.-- 06/08/2015 4:03:05PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35605 6/8/2015 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8080035897 001.058.055.558 53667D:SERVICE 36.90 Total : 36.90 35606 6/8/2015 000087 VERIZON WIRELESS 97458558662 101.042.000.542 MAY 2015 VERIZON CELL PHONES 1,887.52 9745986855 101.042.000.542 MAY 2015 WIRELESS DATA CARDS 400.14 Total : 2,287.66 35607 6/8/2015 003210 WEST CONSULTANTS INC. 006232 001.058.055.558 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 493.30 Total : 493.30 35608 6/8/2015 002960 WICK, BEN Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 35609 6/8/2015 002651 WOODARD,ARNE Q2 2015 001.011.000.511 Q2 CELL PHONE ALLOWANCE 135.00 Total : 135.00 527150032 5/27/2015 004324 U.S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION JUNE 2015 204.204.000.592 LTGO REFUNDING BONDS 2014 119,050.00 Total : 119,050.00 529150033 5/29/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 9290200757 001.016.000.521 LAW ENFORCEMENT 1,586,081.00 Total : 1,586,081.00 40 Vouchers for bank code : apbank Bank total : 1,744,618.16 40 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,744,618.16 Page: .,07 S vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/08/2015 3:37:14PM Spokane Valley Bank code: pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6139 6/8/2015 004332 CHANDLER, CAROLYN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DANCE CLASS REFUND 95.00 Total : 95.00 6140 6/8/2015 002907 JANSSEN, CHRISTINA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 SUMMER CAMP REFUND 113.00 Total : 113.00 6141 6/8/2015 004331 KEOGH, LUCILE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 Total : 52.00 6142 6/8/2015 004330 KNOWLTON, RICHARD PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT TERRACE VIEV 52.00 Total : 52.00 6143 6/8/2015 004328 LAMOREAUX,SHANNA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 REFUND FOR CANCELLATION SHE 136.00 Total : 136.00 6144 6/8/2015 004329 POPOVA,JULIA PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME/ 52.00 Total : 52.00 6145 6/8/2015 004326 SOLBERG, SUSAN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT FIRESIDE LOU(' 210.00 Total : 210.00 6146 6/8/2015 002588 WA STATE DSHS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 6147 6/8/2015 004327 WILSON,STEVE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 9 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 814.00 9 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 814.00 Page: ,-- 1 vchlist Voucher List Page: q-1"--- 06/11/2015 1:16:17PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35610 6/11/2015 000841 BCI CREATIVE INC 12301 001.076.305.575 CENTERPLACE WEBSITE DESIGN: 211.59 Total : 211.59 35611 6/11/2015 000918 BLUE RIBBON LINEN SUPPLY INC 9647620 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 262.07 9649678 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 225.86 S0108977 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 57.72 S0109539 001.076.305.575 LINEN SERVICE AND SUPPLY AT C 105.85 Total : 651.50 35612 6/11/2015 004132 COBBLESTONE CATERING&EVENTS #140-1 001.076.305.575 CATERING FOR EVENTS AT CENTE 217.31 #172-1 001.076.305.575 CATERING FOR EVENTS AT CENTE 291.04 #37-1 001.076.305.575 CATERING FOR EVENTS AT CENTE 739.02 #52-1 001.076.305.575 CATERING FOR EVENTS AT CENTE 210.07 Total : 1,457.44 35613 6/11/2015 000326 CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION#19 May 2015 001.076.300.576 UTILITIES:CP 627.03 May 2015 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: PW 480.62 Total : 1,107.65 35614 6/11/2015 000795 EARTHWORKS RECYCLING INC. 35800 001.076.305.575 RECYCLING COLLECTION CP 20.00 Total : 20.00 35615 6/11/2015 000246 EAST SPOKANE WATER DIST#1 May 2015 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES FOR EDGECLIF 166.25 May 2015 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 748.54 Total : 914.79 35616 6/11/2015 000869 EVCO SOUND&ELECTRONICS 24416 001.076.305.575 SERVICE AND LABOR FOR CENTE 746.23 Total : 746.23 35617 6/11/2015 002308 FINKE, MELISSA April 2015 001.076.301.571 INSTRUCTOR PAYMENT 112.50 Total : 112.50 35618 6/11/2015 000070 INLAND POWER&LIGHT CO 94202 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES:MAY 2015 PW 397.10 Total : 397.10 35619 6/11/2015 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 May 2015 101.042.000.542 UTILITIES: PW 210.24 Page: ry vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/11/2015 1:16:17PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35619 6/11/2015 000388 000388 IRVIN WATER DIST.#6 (Continued) Total : 210.24 35620 6/11/2015 001002 M &L SUPPLY CO INC S100209042.001 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 277.84 Total : 277.84 35621 6/11/2015 001684 MARKETING SOLUTIONS NW CP M-6-2-15 001.076.305.575 MEDIA AND PURCHASE EXPENSE 2,882.35 CP P 6-2-2015 001.076.305.575 AGENCY PLANNING AND PRODUC 410.00 Total : 3,292.35 35622 6/11/2015 000437 PERIDOT PUBLISHING LLC, LIBERTY LA 17756 001.076.301.571 ADVERTISING 558.00 Total : 558.00 35623 6/11/2015 003307 PERIMETER SECURITY GROUP 6866 001.016.099.521 GATE MOTOR REPLACEMENT 4,252.72 Total : 4,252.72 35624 6/11/2015 001860 PLATT ELECTRICAL SUPPLY G803756 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 171.56 G810043 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 83.70 G827356 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 97.83 G827377 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 15.65 G833299 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 15.65 Total : 384.39 35625 6/11/2015 002592 PURE FILTRATION PRODUCTS 24409 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES FOR CENTERPLACE 200.01 Total : 200.01 35626 6/11/2015 000415 ROSAUERS FOOD&DRUG CENTER 01-429621 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES: CENTERPLACE 27.96 Total : 27.96 35627 6/11/2015 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 6109055 001.076.300.576 CONTRACT MAINT: PARKS MAY 20 58,934.26 6656259 001.016.000.521 MONTHLY SERVICES AT PRECINC- 1,219.35 Total : 60,153.61 35628 6/11/2015 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 May 2015 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES: PARKS 179.63 May 2015 001.076.300.576 WATER CHARGES:PARKS 53.22 May 2015 101.042.000.542 WATER CHARGES: PW 674.33 Total : 907.18 35629 6/11/2015 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTROLS 53137 001.016.000.521 APRIL 2015 MONTHLY MAINT PREC 605.46 Page: �2 !i, vchlist Voucher List Page: —Z 06/11/2015 1:16:17PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35629 6/11/2015 001083 001083 STANDARD PLBG HEATING CONTR( (Continued) Total : 605.46 35630 6/11/2015 003532 STERICYCLE COM.SOLUTIONS INC 150511173101 001.076.305.575 ANSWERING SVC CP:SEA4590531 21.63 Total : 21.63 35631 6/11/2015 000038 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPOKANE 0061543-1518-5 402.402.000.531 WASTE MGMT: PW VACTORING 2,187.86 0083474-2681-2 402.402.000.531 WASTE MGMT: MAINT SHOP 172.94 0083475-2681-9 001.076.305.575 WASTE MGMT: CENTERPLACE 740.46 0083476-2681-7 001.016.000.521 WASTE MGMT: PRECINCT 282.62 Total : 3,383.88 35632 6/11/2015 000066 WCP SOLUTIONS 9047594 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE 1,606.06 9047595 001.076.305.575 SUPPLIES AT CENTERPLACE 234.92 Total : 1,840.98 23 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 81,735.05 23 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 81,735.05 Page: ^3 l o � vchlist Voucher List Page: 1 06/12/2015 2:04:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35633 6/12/2015 000958 AAA SWEEPING LLC 53871 402.402.000.531 STORM DRAIN CLEANING 34,663.20 53872 402.402.000.531 STREET SWEEPING SERVICES 61,919.75 Total : 96,582.95 35634 6/12/2015 000648 ABADAN REPROGRAPHICS 47961 311.000.188.595 PRINT SERVICE 552.74 48008 311.000.188.595 PRINT SERVICE 420.71 Total : 973.45 35635 6/12/2015 000197 ACRANET 104563 001.018.016.518 NEW HIRE BACKGROUND REPOR" 300.00 Total : 300.00 35636 6/12/2015 004334 ANDERSON, ELEANOR CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 15.00 Total : 15.00 35637 6/12/2015 004278 ARCHITECTS WEST INC 8046 310.000.215.594 0215-CITY HALL DESIGN&CN ADW 87,761.60 Total : 87,761.60 35638 6/12/2015 000953 AT&T WIRELESS CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT V; 25.00 Total : 25.00 35639 6/12/2015 000173 BINGAMAN, GREG EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 10.81 Total : 10.81 35640 6/12/2015 000815 BNSF RAILROAD CO SPOKAC042215 101.042.000.542 CROSSING ARM REPAIR 327.58 SPOKAC122414 101.042.000.542 CROSSING ARM REPAIR 151.29 Total : 478.87 35641 6/12/2015 000796 BUDINGER&ASSOCIATES INC M14310-4 303.303.155.595 0155-SULLIVAN BRIDGE MATERIAL 1,999.40 S15093-1 310.000.215.594 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,326.95 Total : 9,326.35 35642 6/12/2015 004338 BURNS, KATHLEEN CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 15.00 Total : 15.00 35643 6/12/2015 001122 CAMERON-REILLY LLC PAY APP 1 303.303.060.595 0060-CONSTRUCTION CONTRAC' 337,139.15 Total : 337,139.15 Page: /3 vchlist Voucher List Page: 2 06/12/2015 2:04:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35644 6/12/2015 002562 CD'A METALS 904052 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 196.96 Total : 196.96 35645 6/12/2015 000101 CDW-G VM62510 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES PW 70.08 Total : 70.08 35646 6/12/2015 002572 CINTAS CORPORATION 606126016 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES PW ACCOUNT 02356 100.17 606126408 101.042.000.543 SERVICES PW ACCOUNT 02384 195.33 606127212 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES PW ACCOUNT 02356 100.17 606128414 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES PW ACCOUNT 02356 100.17 606128802 101.042.000.543 SERVICES PW ACCOUNT 02384 226.73 606129601 101.000.000.542 SUPPLIES PW ACCOUNT 02356 130.58 Total : 853.15 35647 6/12/2015 002419 CLARKS TIRES &AUTOMOTIVE LLC 49827 001.076.000.576 SERIVCE 32811D 2,130.26 Total : 2,130.26 35648 6/12/2015 000588 CVSD#356 AR000703 303.000.205.595 FACILITY USE SPRAGUE/BARKER 119.00 Total 119.00 35649 6/12/2015 003255 DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS 569913 101.042.000.543 TOWER RENTAL PUBLIC WORKS 206.07 Total : 206.07 35650 6/12/2015 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 77972263 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( 1,006.63 Total : 1,006.63 35651 6/12/2015 002604 DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC 779763215 001.090.000.548 COMPUTER LEASE 001-8922117-0( 120.29 Total : 120.29 35652 6/12/2015 003256 DISCOVERY BENEFITS INC, HRA PLAN 0000548147-IN 001.018.016.518 MAY HRA SERVICE FEE 409.50 Total : 409.50 35653 6/12/2015 000422 DISHMAN DODGE INC DOCS343115 402.402.000.531 SERVICE 5-401 863.64 Total : 863.64 35654 6/12/2015 003697 ELECTRIC LIGHTWAVE LLC 13033067 001.090.000.586 SCRAPS INTERNET SERVICE 88.48 Total : 88.48 Page: /1-/ vchlist Voucher List Page: �3 06/12/2015 2:04:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35655 6/12/2015 002157 ELJAY OIL COMPANY 4238365 101.000.000.542 FUEL FOR MAINT SHOP 107.89 Total : 107.89 35656 6/12/2015 003682 EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC 0415-0464 303.303.166.595 0166-PINES RD&GRACE AVE INT 2,172.10 Total : 2,172.10 35657 6/12/2015 004234 EPICURUS INC CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 25.00 Total : 25.00 35658 6/12/2015 002887 ETTER,MCMAHON,LAMBERSON,CLARY, 1 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,780.00 Total : 1,780.00 35659 6/12/2015 004165 EXPRESS SERVICES INC 15835202-1 001.090.000.518 EMPLOYEMENT SERVICES 344.37 Total : 344.37 35660 6/12/2015 000609 GENDRONS CO 5755 001.032.000.543 SUPPLIES: PW 201.10 Total : 201.10 35661 6/12/2015 000007 GRAINGER 9755217156 101.043.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 28.87 Total : 28.87 35662 6/12/2015 002043 HDR ENGINEERING INC 00213487-B 303.000.177.544 0177-FURURE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 5,647.65 Total : 5,647.65 35663 6/12/2015 004089 HERRERA ENVIRONMENTAL,CONSULT/ 36589 402.000.193.531 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30,511.16 Total : 30,511.16 35664 6/12/2015 003297 HIGGINS, LEWIS ROD EXPENSE 001.011.000.511 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 117.88 Total : 117.88 35665 6/12/2015 002538 HYDRAULICS PLUS INC 19259 101.000.000.542 SERVICE 5-209 532.63 Total : 532.63 35666 6/12/2015 000313 INLAND ASPHALT COMPANY INC. PAY APP 2 402.000.000.595 SMALL WORKS 2014 UTILITY 83,489.99 Total : 83,489.99 35667 6/12/2015 000012 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS 16562 001.032.000.543 2015 SUBSCRIPTION FOR S.ARLT 39.95 Total : 39.95 Page: .---- // vchlist Voucher List Page: 4 06/12/2015 2:04:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35668 6/12/2015 001602 KNUTSON, KEN EXPENSE 001.032.000.543 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 111.17 Total : 111.17 35669 6/12/2015 001944 LANCER LTD 0452989 001.032.000.543 BUSINESS CARDS 78.26 Total : 78.26 35670 6/12/2015 004335 LINCOLN CENTER SPOKANE LLC CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 175.00 Total : 175.00 35671 6/12/2015 001640 MAINTENANCE SOLUTIONS INC 60519105 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 892.29 Total : 892.29 35672 6/12/2015 002259 MENKE JACKSON BEYER LLP 492 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 48.75 497 001.013.015.515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,952.65 Total : 2,001.40 35673 6/12/2015 000662 NAT'L BARRICADE&SIGN CO 87794 309.000.176.595 SIGNS FORAPPLEWAYTRAIL 1,944.64 Total : 1,944.64 35674 6/12/2015 001035 NDM TECHNOLOGIES INC 23155 001.090.000.518 QUARTERLY SENTINEL EPS SERVI 1,197.00 23159 001.090.000.518 QUARTERLY SENTINEL IPS 1,197.00 Total : 2,394.00 35675 6/12/2015 001844 NIMRI, RABA EXPENSE 001.018.014.514 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 1,537.46 Total : 1,537.46 35676 6/12/2015 000652 OFFICE DEPOT INC. 773818118001 001.018.016.518 SUPPLIES: HR 15.47 774129718001 001.018.014.514 SUPPLIES: FINANCE 18.33 Total : 33.80 35677 6/12/2015 000058 OMA A500163 001.018.016.518 NEW HIRE PHYSICALS MAY 525.00 A500163 001.018.016.518 NEW HIRE PHYSICALS APRIL 75.00 Total : 600.00 35678 6/12/2015 000881 OXARC INC R345370 101.042.000.542 CYLINDER RENTAL 102.83 Total : 102.83 35679 6/12/2015 000029 PITNEY BOWES INC 391591 001.090.000.518 POSTAGE METER SERVICE 267.01 Page: ,lam vchlist Voucher ListPage:40"5-- 06/12/2015 2:04:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code : apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35679 6/12/2015 000029 PITNEY BOWES INC (Continued) 523190 001.090.000.518 SUPPLIES POSTAGE METER 199.58 Total : 466.59 35680 6/12/2015 004339 PLYMOUTH CONGREGATIONAL CHURCI CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 165.00 Total : 165.00 35681 6/12/2015 001089 POE ASPHALT PAVING INC. 2014 101.223.40.00 RETAINAGE RELEASE 68,064.26 Total : 68,064.26 35682 6/12/2015 002510 POHL SPRING WORKS INC 165625 101.000.000.542 SERVICE 5-203 529.59 Total : 529.59 35683 6/12/2015 000041 PROTHMAN COMPANY 2015-4840 001.018.014.514 EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 6,166.66 Total : 6,166.66 35684 6/12/2015 002520 RWC GROUP 160745 101.000.000.542 SERVICE 5-210 635.01 Total : 635.01 35685 6/12/2015 004333 SANDRY CONSTRUCTION CO INC PAY APP 1 403.000.197.595 BROADWAY AVE SD RETROFITS-I 48,083.00 Total : 48,083.00 35686 6/12/2015 002835 SCS DELIVERY INC 6779 001.011.000.511 PACKAGE DELIVERY FOR COUNCI 50.00 Total : 50.00 35687 6/12/2015 000709 SENSKE LAWN&TREE CARE INC. 6109082 101.042.000.542 ON-CALL EMERGENCY TRAFFIC C 530.46 6531258 402.402.000.531 2015 ROADWAY LANDSCAPING SE 6,431.41 6649577 101.042.000.542 ON-CALL EMERGENCY TRAFFIC C 169.57 Total : 7,131.44 35688 6/12/2015 004337 SOFTTECHNOLOGIES CORP CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 25.00 Total : 25.00 35689 6/12/2015 001140 SPECIAL ASPHALT PRODUCTS INVC068093 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 7,450.68 Total : 7,450.68 35690 6/12/2015 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE MAY 2015 001.013.015.515 RECORDING FEES 532.00 Page: l2 vchlist Voucher List Page: 06/12/2015 2:04:28PM Spokane Valley Bank code: apbank Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 35690 6/12/2015 000230 000230 SPOKANE CO AUDITORS OFFICE (Continued) Total : 532.00 35691 6/12/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER 51502727 101.042.000.542 MAY 2015 WORK CREW INVOICE 5,118.21 Total : 5,118.21 35692 6/12/2015 000324 SPOKANE CO WATER DIST#3 1276 101.042.000.542 SUPPLIES: PW 8,022.12 Total : 8,022.12 35693 6/12/2015 000862 SPOKANE ROCK PRODUCTS INC. PAY APP 4 311.000.187.595 SPRAGUE ST PRESERVATION PRC 718.56 Total : 718.56 35694 6/12/2015 001969 SUNSHINE DISPOSAL 864792 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION 75.58 875319 101.042.000.542 TRANSFER STATION 140.36 Total : 215.94 35695 6/12/2015 000093 THE SPOKESMAN-REVIEW 424085 311.000.188.595 ADVERTISING ACCOUNT 42365 1,727.26 426793 001.013.000.513 ADVERTISING ACCOUNT 50869 474.73 Total : 2,201.99 35696 6/12/2015 000335 TIRE-RAMA 8040054663 402.402.000.531 SERVICE 35517D 210.47 8080036142 001.032.000.543 SERVICE 35518D 152.13 Total : 362.60 35697 6/12/2015 002597 TWISTED PAIR ENTERPRISES LLC 5312015 001.011.000.511 BROASCASTING COUNCIL MEETII 454.00 Total : 454.00 35698 6/12/2015 004336 VERMEER CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 25.00 Total : 25.00 35699 6/12/2015 004340 WEIGAND, ROBERT CRY WOLF REFUND 001.016.000.342 FALSE ALARM REFUND PERMIT VE 15.00 Total : 15.00 605150035 6/5/2015 000001 SPOKANE CO TREASURER MAY 2015 001.229.51.13 SPOKANE COUNTY SERVICES 202,238.85 Total : 202,238.85 68 Vouchers for bank code: apbank Bank total : 1,032,233.18 68 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,032,233.18 Page: rU vchlist Voucher List Page: r1-' 06/12/2015 11:50:50AM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6148 6/12/2015 004351 BENNE,STEPHANIE PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 70.00 Total : 70.00 6149 6/12/2015 004344 BROWN,JENNIFER PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME) 52.00 Total : 52.00 6150 6/12/2015 004341 GRAND CANYON UNIVERSITY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT ROOM 109 52.00 Total : 52.00 6151 6/12/2015 004349 HAMMER, BECKY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME! 52.00 Total : 52.00 6152 6/12/2015 004345 IBEW LOCAL#73 PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6153 6/12/2015 004347 JENTGES, ROBYN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT BROWNS PARK 52.00 Total : 52.00 6154 6/12/2015 004350 MCGARRY,AMY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6155 6/12/2015 004353 NELSON,JIM PARKS REFUND 001237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU SPF 177.00 Total : 177.00 6156 6/12/2015 004342 NISSEN, DAVID PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 6157 6/12/2015 002700 NW GYMNASTICS BOOSTERS PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT VALLEY MISSIC 52.00 Total : 52.00 6158 6/12/2015 004346 RENZ, KAILY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT DISCOVERY PL 55.00 Total : 55.00 6159 6/12/2015 004343 VINCENT, KATIE PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 6160 6/12/2015 004348 WAGSTAFF, BRIAN PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT MIRABEAU ME) 257.00 Page: !4 / 9 vchlist Voucher List Page: _2- 06/12/2015 11:50:50AM Spokane Valley Bank code : pk-ref Voucher Date Vendor Invoice Fund/Dept Description/Account Amount 6160 6/12/2015 004348 004348 WAGSTAFF, BRIAN (Continued) Total : 257.00 6161 6/12/2015 004352 WIEBER, PATTY PARKS REFUND 001.237.10.99 DAMAGE DEPOSIT GREAT ROOM 210.00 Total : 210.00 14 Vouchers for bank code : pk-ref Bank total : 1,553.00 14 Vouchers in this report Total vouchers : 1,553.00 I,the undersigned,do certify under penalty of perjury, that the materials have been furnished,the services rendered,or the labor performed as described herein and that the claim is just,due and an unpaid obligation against the City of Spokane Valley,and that I am authorized to authenticate and certify said claim. Finance Director Date Council member reviewed: Mayor Date Council Member Date Page: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval : Item: Check all that apply: ® consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Payroll for Period Ending June 15, 2015 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Budget/Financial impacts: Employees Council Total Gross: $ 277,726.95 $ - $277,726.95 Benefits: $ 49,782.61 $ - $ 49,782.61 Total payroll $ 327,509.56 $ - $327,509.56 RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Approve above payroll. [Approved as part of the Consent Agenda, or may be removed and discussed separately.] STAFF CONTACT: Raba Nimri DRAFT MINUTES SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING STUDY SESSION FORMAT Spokane Valley City Hall Council Chambers Spokane Valley,Washington June 2,2015 6:00 p.m. Attendance: Councilmembers Staff Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Cary Driskell, City Attorney Rod Higgins, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Ed Pace, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Ben Wick,Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director Chelsie Taylor,Interim Finance Director ABSENT: John Hohman, Community Development Dir. Bill Bates, Councilmember Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Councilmember Pace, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Bates from tonight's meeting. ACTION ITEMS: 1. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance 15-012, Gambling Tax—Mark Calhoun After City Clerk Bainbridge read the ordinance title, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded, to approve ordinance 15-012 amending Spokane Valley Municipal Code 3.25, gambling tax. After Deputy City Manager Calhoun went over the background of the ordinance, Mayor Grafos invited public comments. No comments were offered. There was brief discussion among Council about the reduced revenues, as well as a comment about not knowing what the State Legislature will do concerning future shared revenues. Mayor Grafos suggested this matter be brought back again in another year. Vote by Acclamation:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 2. Proposed Resolution 15-004, Support of North/South Corridor Name Change —Mayor Grafos It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve Resolution 15-004, supporting the name change of the North/South Corridor to the Thomas E. Foley Corridor. Councilmember Pace said he will vote against this as he feels this is not the scope of this Council and is not a benefit to our citizens. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Mayor Grafos, Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Hafner, Higgins and Wick. Opposed: Councilmember Pace. Motion carried. 3.Motion Consideration: Bid Award,Houk-Maxwell-Sinto Street Preservation Project— Steve Worley It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to award the Houk-Maxwell-Sinto Street Preservation project, #0220 to T. LaRiviere Equipment and Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $339,647.83 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. After Public Works Director Guth explained the background of the project and bid, Mayor Grafos invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed: None. Motion carried. 4.Motion Consideration: Reappoint Liz Beck to Tourism Promotion Area Commission—Mayor Grafos Mayor Grafos recommended the reappointment of Liz Beck to the TPA for a three-year term. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to confirm the Mayoral appointment of Liz Beck to the Council Study Session:06-02-2015 Page 1 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT Tourism Promotion Area Commission for a three-year term from June 1, 2015, through May 31, 2018. Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. NON-ACTION ITEMS: 5. Comprehensive Plan/Citizen Site Specific Amendment Requests—John Hohman Director Hohman explained that the goal of tonight's meeting is to obtain concurrence, or not, on these Citizen Action Requests (CARs); he said the Public Participation Plan was brought to Council in January, and one of the goals is to identify issues early, so we are trying to get public participation early in the process, and one way to do that is to open this process to any citizen, property owner, or interested individual who wants to submit an application; said the process is split into two categories with tonight handling the site specific citizen-initiated requests, and at next week's meeting to address the text and overlay amendments. Mr.Hohman said that tonight's focus is on specific requests for several parcels, and that they have tried to consolidate those into several easily discussed items. He explained that as these CARs are reviewed,he will look to Council to indicate which of these to include now and what to perhaps include in some future amendment process. As noted in Mr. Hohman's handout summarizing the "Citizen Amendment Requests," there are three options: what to include, what to exclude, and what to defer to a future annual comp plan update. Further, Mr. Hohman explained that there will not be a future adoption of the individual amendment requests, as they won't be acted upon until the major components are in place; he said these CARs may be considered as pro and con in the broader decision of the update; he asked that Council not make a judgment,but more that this would be a matter of what we should study in the future, what the scope of work should look like for the next phase of this project, and what Council wants staff to bring back as part of the Update process. Councilmember Pace asked if it is possible to include in the process, something to prevent a change to property without the property owner's knowledge. Mr. Hohman replied that we will do what we can to make sure the property owner is aware, and he gave the example of a County comprehensive plan update years ago for the Ponderosa area which made it more dense than anything else in the surrounding areas, which he said caused a lot of anxiety. Mr. Hohman said staff will work to make sure property owners affected will be notified, adding that having their approval is a more difficult process as it is too early to speculate what those changes, if any,might be, and said it might hamper the process if we asked for each individual property owner's approval. Councilmember Pace stated that he does not like making changes without the property owner's approval. Councilmember Wick asked if what Council would be looking at concerning the CARs, is also an opportunity to look at the larger surrounding area, and he gave as an example, along Nora. Mr. Hohman concurred and said staff is aware the office zone in that area is not working well. Mr. Hohman noted that there are numerous possibilities for Council to consider such as changing zones up or down, changing development regulations, and consolidating zones. Mr. Hohman stated that no fees are associated with these requests, and Council could also decide not to take any action at all; but if a CAR were deferred, Mr. Hohman said he would seek legal's opinion as to whether an applicant would have to reapply and/or pay a fee, or if such deferred CAR would automatically be included on the next future comp plan docket. As Ms. Barlow went through her PowerPoint presentation, she mentioned that the staff report analyzes the CARs requests against the input themes or focus themes, so the report indicates whether the CAR is consistent with those themes. She also noted that these are just the site-specific applications and not the text amendment and overlay zones, which she explained, will come before Council next week, followed by Council's final decision of the CARS at the June 23 meeting. After brief Council discussion, Mr. Jackson noted that no action is scheduled for tonight's meeting,and that staff can formulate a motion for a future meeting based on Council's consensus. Ms. Barlow explained that for each CAR, Council could include in the Comp Plan Update analysis, defer to a future comp plan update, or not include in the Comp Plan Update analysis. After Ms. Barlow's review of each CAR, there was Council consensus to include them all for future discussion in the Comp Plan Update, with Deputy Mayor Woodard disagreeing with moving CAR 2015-0010 through 0011 Council Study Session:06-02-2015 Page 2 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT forward. It was also determined that the specific CAR that was withdrawn won't be included but the nature of the request will be included. There was some additional discussion on CAR 2015-0016 with Councilmember Wick asking to look at the other parcel in the field below, and Council concurred. Council asked about the individual property owner's input concerning CAR 2015-0020, and Ms. Barlow said she would check the minutes to see if other property owners expressed their feelings on these parcels. Director Hohman said that task could be included in the next contract scope; that when they put together the scope for preparation of the draft comp plan and development regulations, staff will have a better idea of when this can come back to Council again; said there is a lot of work to accomplish, and it would likely take three months or more; adding that many of these issues will need focused study. Mayor Grafos called for a recess at 7:50 p.m.;he reconvened the meeting at 8:00 p.m. 6. Initiative/Referendum Process— Cary Driskell City Attorney Driskell said that interest had been expressed regarding the powers of initiative and referendum in our City, which is a non-chartered code city. Via his PowerPoint presentation, he gave a general explanation of the powers and processes dealing with initiative and referendum, and gave examples of each; and said our City adopted those powers in 2005. After his presentation, Councilmember Pace explained that he has asked for this information in association with the truck issue, and having a no-truck parking in residential areas. Mr. Driskell said he feels those are police powers typically reserved to the Council, and as such,are typically not subject to initiative. 7. Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan(CIP)—Eric Guth After Public Works Director Guth went over his PowerPoint presentation explaining the Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan projects, there was Council consensus to bring this forward next week for a motion consideration. 8.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos Concerning interviewing candidates for temporarily filling Councilmember Bates'position,Mayor Grafos said he feels all eighteen applicants should be interviewed, and Council concurred. After Council discussion about when to hold the interviews and how many meetings to hold for that purpose, June 10th was suggested as the interview date. It was also determined to limit each interview to fifteen minutes,to permit each candidate a minute or two of those fifteen minutes, for self-introductions if desired; and that the meeting(s) would be video-recorded. The meeting date for the nomination and selection process was discussed, and Councilmember Wick mentioned the possibility of having two Councilmembers absent at the June 23rd meeting as they would be attending the AWC (Association of Washington Cities) conference. Mr. Jackson suggested the specific date could be determined later, if needed, and Council expressed a desire to hold that meeting June 17th. Mr. Jackson noted that the City Clerk would send Council a copy of the process; and that the process could be built into the governance manual later; and that the dates will be confirmed and communicated to Council as soon as possible. 9. Information Only Items: (a)Department Reports; (b)Montgomery Ave Street Preservation Bid These items were for information only and were not reported or discussed. 10. Council Comments—Mayor Grafos—There were no Council Comments. 11. City Manager Comments—Mike Jackson -There were no City Manager comments. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously approved to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:50 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Council Study Session:06-02-2015 Page 3 of 3 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Regular Meeting Formal Meeting Format Tuesday,June 9,2015 Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. Attendance: City Staff Dean Grafos,Mayor Mike Jackson, City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Rod Higgins,Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Ed Pace, Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Ben Wick,Councilmember Eric Guth,Public Works Director John Hohman, Community Development Dir. ABSENT Lori Barlow, Senior Planner Bill Bates, Councilmember Steve Worley, Senior Engineer Chris Bainbridge, City Clerk INVOCATION: Pastor Darrell Cole of the Living Hope Community Church gave the invocation. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Council,staff and audience rose for the Pledge of Allegiance. ROLL CALL City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Bates from tonight's meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the agenda. INTRODUCTION OF SPECIAL GUESTS AND PRESENTATIONS: 1-90 Barker Interchange Presentation by Washington State Department of Transportation Representative Larry Larson Public Works Director Guth introduced Mr. Larry Larson, Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Project Engineer and design project manager for the I-90 Barker Road Interchange project. Mr. Larson explained that WSDOT began studying the Barker Road interchange in 2013 through an Interchange Justification Report, which is federally required if changes to interstate accesses are proposed. The study identified that congestion occurs during the existing conditions and that improvements are needed to accommodate future traffic volumes. The study preliminarily looked at several options for improvements, which resulted in the recommendation of a tight-diamond interchange with roundabout treatments on Barker Road. He also explained some of the practical solutions to the I-90 Barker to Harvard Road, and mentioned the project cost is estimated at$45 million,with the actual cost to WSDOT of$25 million after the planned local contribution for Henry Road. Mr. Larson expressed his appreciation to the Spokane Valley staff as they worked together on this project. Councilmember Wick asked about including this project on our TIP (Transportation Improvement Program) and Mr. Guth replied that there is nothing wrong with us putting that on our TIP,but it is not required. COMMITTEE,BOARD,LIAISON SUMMARY REPORTS Councilmember Hafner: reported that he and Councilmember Pace attended the Health Board meeting, and that the Board received a perfect audit; the Spokane Transit Authority (STA) also received a perfect audit;he attended a STA Special Board meeting to discuss the recently failed sales tax ballot measure and Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-09-2015 Page 1 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT what the next steps might be, mentioned that he and Councilmember Pace were both opposed to the increase as it would benefit downtown Spokane but not Spokane Valley. He reported that the Health District Board meeting also went well. Councilmember Pace: said he attended the STA Planning Committee meeting and the Spokane Regional Health District Policy Committee meeting. Councilmember Wick: reported that he attended the inaugural Fire Operations 101, and said he has great appreciation for all they do,that this was a type of"day-in-the-life-of-a-firefighter;" as chair of the SRTC (Spokane Regional Transportation Council), said they received a letter from and met with the Tribe of Spokane Indians requesting membership on the council; GSI (Greater Spokane, Inc.) is working on a competitive change, that they hired a consultant to survey how our area compares with their competitors for economic development, and it showed our strong and weak points, and said he looks forward to getting a full report; said he went to the Spokane Valley Kiwanis Scholarship Breakfast; and to the Campfire awards. Councilmember Higgins: said he attended a church dedication at the Veteran's Memorial; went to the Inland Northwest Partners Cultural Tourism as Sustainable Economic Development Strategy; went to the Clean Air Board meeting where they discussed increasing complaints about marijuana growing and usage; and attended the Spokane Valley Finance Committee meeting. Deputy Mayor Woodard: said most of his meetings were postponed or cancelled, and several start tomorrow. MAYOR'S REPORT Mayor Grafos reported that he also attended the Spokane Valley Finance Committee meeting; and attended the P.A.C.E. awards at Mirabeau Park Hotel honoring students. PROCLAMATION: n/a PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Grafos invited public comments. Howard Role, Spokane Valley: spoke about railroad crossings at Vista and Barker with the whistles "getting out of hand;" said there is no reason for whistles and that whistles won't stop anything; said the trains are going through there between 40 and 50 miles per hour; also University Road has no whistle order and he wants the whistle stopped; said he is a retired Union Pacific Railroad worker, and there is no reason to have the whistles blowing coming and going and the area needs a quite zone. Tony Lazanis, Spokane Valley: said last week he made a mistake concerning his security system, and punched the wrong button but finally got the alarm stopped; said the security company told him they called him but said he didn't hear a phone call; feels the $85.00 false alarm fee is excessive and he wants Council to make it better; said we "pay big bucks" to support police and fire and this is not a good law and he wants it changed. Deputy Mayor Woodard asked Mr. Lazanis how long he has had his alarm system and he said for ten years. Scott MacClay, Spokane Valley: said he was involved in the formation of our City and is for our City forming its own law enforcement department; mentioned controversial shootings and deaths associated with Spokane Valley citizens and law enforcement; and said it is time to look at what we are going to do with the police. Tim Vile, Spokane Valley: spoke about Ryan Holyk's fatal bicycle accident; said the family and community has had a terrible lie perpetrated and the investigation was fraud and void of critical information. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Proposed 2016-2021 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) — Steve Worley Mayor Grafos opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Mr. Worley commented that as a result of the last time this was before Council, he incorporated Council's comments into this TIP, which included the studies and recommendations about the Sullivan Road Corridor Study and the University Study. After going over some of the projects, Mr. Worley mentioned the project summary sheets, and explained that it Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-09-2015 Page 2 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT is hoped that these individual sheets will provide more information to the public; and Deputy Mayor Woodard said he likes the one-page summary.Mayor Grafos invited public comment.No comments were offered and Mayor Grafos closed the public hearing at 6:45 p.m. 2. CONSENT AGENDA: Consists of items considered routine which are approved as a group. Any member of Council may ask that an item be removed from the Consent Agenda to be considered separately.Proposed Motion:I move to approve the Consent Agenda. a.Approval of vouchers on June 9,2015 Request for Council Action Form Totaling: $1,891,168.82 b.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 15,2015: $314,642.01 c.Approval of Payroll for Pay Period Ending May 31,2015: $432,947.01 d.Approval of April 24,2015 Minutes of Council of Governments, Special Council e.Approval of May 12,2015 Minutes of Council Regular Meeting,Formal Format f.Approval of June 2,2016 Minutes of 5:00 p.m. Special Council Meeting It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to approve the Consent Agenda. NEW BUSINESS 3.Motion Consideration: 2016-2021 Stormwater Construction Improvement Plan—Eric Guth It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to approve the 2016-2021 Stormwater Capital Improvement Plan and authorize the City Manager to make application for grants to assist in funding the Plan. After Mr. Guth explained the Plan as noted on his June 9, 2015 Request for Council Action form, Mayor Grafos invited public comment. No comments were offered. Vote by Acclamation: In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. 4. Motion Consideration: Comprehensive Plan Citizen Site Specific Amendment Requests (CAR) —John Hohman It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to include the following CARs in the Comp Plan Update for further analysis: CAR 2015-0001 through 0017, and 2015-0019 to 0020. Community Development Director Hohman gave a brief overview of the proposed CARs; said that last week Council heard about these requests in detail; that we are required to update our Comp Plan every eight years or by 2017;that we have embarked on this process now as our development regulations and comp plan are very outdated and said there was a lot of testimony in the Planning Commission meetings to support that. He mentioned that Council adopted the Public Participation Plan January 6, which plan included identifying issues early and evaluating options for resolution during the planning process; he said this CAR process has been very successful in getting public participation, and that the Planning Commission meetings have standing room only, and that tonight's Council meeting has above-average attendance. Mr. Hohman explained that this method is used to gather proposed changes to the comp plan, map or development regulations; that it is a tool for the public to enable comments at the outset and help us define the future scope of study; and that we are in the very initial stages of developing those conditions. Mr. Hohman said so far,the City's vision statements seem to be consistent; that last week each CAR was described in detail so he won't do that tonight, but is here to answer any questions about the process, and mentioned that consultants from VanNess Feldman are here as well. Mr. Hohman stressed that any action taken tonight does not mean that zones will change, but only that these topics will be studied and brought back for future discussion,which will include many opportunities for public involvement. Mr. Hohman again stressed that tonight's decision will not change zoning, but only allow for future opportunities to discuss increasing or decreasing density in certain areas; and once all the data has been brought forth for discussion,that will be the opportunity to approve or modify those future plans, such as for example, consolidating garden office with office; but said he cannot speculate on what might be done as all the underlying work has not yet been completed. Councilmember Pace asked if some of these CARs were done without the property owner's knowledge and Mr. Hohman said staff is working to ensure that Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-09-2015 Page 3 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT all property owners will be aware of any anticipated change, and that staff will do a citywide mailing to help the public understand the process and give opportunities for input. Mr. Hohman also stated that Mr. Tadas Kisielius will come to discuss what Council's authority is and what Council can or cannot do in regard to the remainder of this process; and said this will hopefully occur in July or August. There was other discussion about the generality of these CARS, and that the options for Council tonight are to include each CAR for future study, not include them for future study, or defer to an annual update cycle. Mayor Grafos said he feels the process is working and a lot of people are aware of what is going on; and feels Council should move all the CARs forward for further analysis. Mayor Grafos invited public comment. 1. Teresa Evans, 12824 E 4th: regarding rezoning on 4th; said she doesn't want to see it change and likes the way the neighborhood is now. 2. Mike Hart, 12825 E 6th: concerning the same issue; said there are problems with kids in apartments in the current neighborhood with vandalism and no response from the police; said the police aren't protecting the investments; and he wants to protect the integrity of neighborhoods. 3. Julie Layman, 12605 E 4th: regarding CAP 2015-0020; asked Council to consider declining that rezone request; said this was done without the property owner's consent; has a petition of 120 residents who oppose this and one landowner who wants the change. 4. Nina Fluegal, 13401 E 4th: extended apologies to Mr. Crapo; said he was correct when he notified a City official about having his view obstructed, and said that has been rectified so no legal action on Mr. Crapo's part is necessary; asked Council not to approve the MF-2 zone for this area. 5. Donna Blumberg, 8005 E. Longfellow Avenue: mentioned Verona Sothern's trailer at 187145 Appleway Court; they want to change that from single family to high density but it is not a good idea;that the area will start to "go downhill." 6. Terry Warner, 3211 N Tschirley Road: about the proposed change from low to high density on Barker/Laberry; concerned about the Mica View Trailer Park; said several of the people living there have physical needs, and that some trailers are very old and moving them would destroy them. 7. Jim Fluegel: mentioned bringing in a lawyer to tell Council what they can or can't do makes him nervous; before changing zoning he wanted to talk about fixing loopholes and about developers who come in with high-price lawyers whose job it is to find those loopholes; wants the process slowed down; said law violators should be punished; that he fires people for breaking rules, doesn't forgive them; and wants Council to look at what we have to do to stop the leaks in the process. 8. Dick Grove, 411 S Vercler Road: handed a letter and petition to the City Clerk who distributed copies to Council; said there is only one exit on 4th Avenue between Pines and McDonald; wants the request denied and not be rezoned; said he has a petition signed by over 100 adults who live in that area to deny CPA 2015-0020. 9. James Johnson, 13224 E 4th: read his prepared letter,which the City Clerk previously distributed copies to Council; mentioned the "Valley Way of Life" and asked Council not to include CAR 0015-0010, 0011, and 0020 as such change would not be keeping with the "Valley Way of Life." 10. William Curriou, 110 N Barker Road: said he feels others will make the decision and asked who makes the final decision. 11. Sandy Brown, 12906 E 3rd Lane: said she is against changing the zoning to high density as she doesn't want her house adjacent to a two-story building with people looking into her yard; and doesn't want the increased crime and traffic; and she handed some pictures to the Clerk. 12. Wayne Vinson,N 117 Barker Road: spoke concerning Barker and Laberry; said apartments are not a good fit for that area; that there are a lot of young kids wanting to buy homes now but are getting outbid by these big corporations. There were no further public comments. It was moved by Councilmember Pace and seconded, to amend the motion to remove 2015-0020 from consideration, and 0004 through 0009 since those property owners didn't give their consent. Council discussion included Mayor Grafos stating he feels the process should include all the CARs; Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-09-2015 Page 4 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT Councilmember Hafner also noted he feels all CARS should be examined, and Deputy Mayor Woodard stating that tonight's action is not to approve anything. Vote by Acclamation to amend the motion: In Favor: Councilmember Pace. Opposed: Mayor Grafos, Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Hafner, Higgins, and Wick. Motion failed. There was other brief discussion on the Growth Management Act and our population allocation. Mr. Hohman stated that Council would make the decision on all these issues later. Vote on the initial motion to include the following CARS in the Comp Plan Update for further analysis: CAR 2015-0001 through 0017, and 2015-0019 to 0020:In Favor: Unanimous. Opposed:None. Motion carried. Mayor Grafos called for a recess at 7:45 p.m.;he reconvened the meeting at 7:57 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mayor Grafos invited public comment; no comments were offered. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORTS 5. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Overlays and Text Amendments—John Hohman Mr. Hohman explained that the Comp Plan Update has been split into two sections, and that these are the overlays and actual texts to the development regulations. Ms. Barlow then went through her PowerPoint presentation explaining that the options for these text and overlay requests are to include in the analysis, defer to future updates, or not include in the analysis. After Ms. Barlow descried each request,there was Council concurrence to include 2015-0021, 0022, 0023, 0024, and 0018; and to exclude 0026 and 0025. Ms.Barlow mentioned that this would come back to Council for a motion at the June 30 meeting. 6.Advance Agenda—Mayor Grafos It was noted that the motion consideration for the com plan/overlays and text amendments would be changed from June 23 to June 30 as two Councilmembers are planning to attend the AWC (Association of Washington Cities)conference on June 23. 7.Mansfield Avenue Connection Project# 0156 This was for information only and was not reported or discussed. CITY MANAGER COMMENTS Mr. Jackson explained that the House Finance Committee passed a version of the nuisance abatement bill but that it still has to go to the House and Senate, and needs language to make sure it doesn't impact a City's current ability to collect amounts over$2,000. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Minutes Regular Council Meeting:06-09-2015 Page 5 of 5 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting Wednesday,June 10,2015 Attendance: Councilmembers: Staff: Dean Grafos, Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Rod Higgins, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Ed Pace,Councilmember Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk Ben Wick, Councilmember ABSENT: Bill Bates, Councilmember Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Bates from tonight's meeting. Temporary Council Position Candidate Interviews—Mayor Grafos Mayor Grafos explained that the purpose of tonight's meeting is to interview applicants for the temporary council position. After Mayor Grafos briefly explained the interview process, the following individuals were interviewed: (1) Gary Babcock;(2)Fred Beaulac; (3)Brand Bersante; (4) Stewart Bowmer;(5)Julia Brown; (6) Kay Brant; (7) Bill Gothmann; (8) Timothy Hattenburg; (9) Martin Muench; (10) Donna O'Leary; (11)Robert Race; (12)Janna Roher-Brown; (13)David Starr, and(14)Tom Towey. Frank Lekturish, originally scheduled as the 9th interview, failed to attend; Robert Lonn, originally scheduled as the 10th interview withdrew earlier in the day; Talia Noyes, originally scheduled as the 12th interview, failed to attend; and Kristopher Pockett, originally scheduled as the 14th interview, stopped by Human Resources prior to the interviews and withdrew him name as a candidate. After the last interview, it was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. Dean Grafos,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Special Meeting:June 10,2015 Page 1 of 1 Approved by Council: DRAFT MINUTES City of Spokane Valley City Council Special Meeting Monday,June 15,2015 Attendance: Councilmembers: Staff: Dean Grafos, Mayor Mike Jackson,City Manager Arne Woodard,Deputy Mayor Cary Driskell, City Attorney Chuck Hafner, Councilmember Mark Calhoun,Deputy City Manager Rod Higgins, Councilmember Erik Lamb,Deputy City Attorney Ed Pace,Councilmember Mike Stone,Parks&Recreation Director Ben Wick, Councilmember Chris Bainbridge,City Clerk ABSENT: Bill Bates, Councilmember Mayor Grafos called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: City Clerk Bainbridge called the roll; all Councilmembers were present except Councilmember Bates. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to excuse Councilmember Bates from tonight's meeting. 1.EXECUTIVE SESSION: IRCW 42.30.110(1)(h)1 It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn into Executive Session for approximately sixty minutes to evaluate the qualifications of candidates for a temporary appointment to elective office, and that action will be taken upon return to open session." Council adjourned into executive session at 5:02 p.m. At 5:14 p.m., Mayor Grafos declared Council out of Executive Session 2. OPEN SESSION: COUNCIL NOMINATIONS AND SELECTION TO TEMPORARILY FILL COUNCIL POSITION#7—Mayor Grafos After a brief explanation of the nomination process by Mayor Grafos, Mayor Grafos began the nomination process: 1. It was moved by Mayor Grafos and seconded to nominate Kay Bryant for the temporary council position. 2. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard and seconded to nominate David Starr for the temporary council position. 3. It was moved by Councilmember Wick to nominate Julia Brown for the temporary council position; the motion/nomination was not seconded and the applicant did not move forward. 4. It was moved by Councilmember Hafner and seconded to nominate Tom Towey for the temporary council position. 5. It was moved by Councilmember Pace and seconded to nominate Bill Gothmann for the temporary council position. Special Meeting:June 15,2015 Page 1 of 2 Approved by Council: DRAFT 6. It was moved by Councilmember Higgins and seconded to nominate Tim Hattenburg for the temporary council position. 7. It was moved by Mayor Grafos and seconded to nominate Fred Beaulac for the temporary council position. 8. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard to nominate Donna O'Leary for the temporary council position. The motion was not seconded and the applicant did not move forward. There were no further nominations and Mayor Grafos closed the nominations. Vote on the nominations by raised hand: 1.—for Kay Bryant—2 votes (Mayor Grafos and Councilmember Hafner) 2.—for David Starr—3 votes (Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Higgins and Pace) 3. -n/a 4.—for Tom Towey— 3 votes(Mayor Grafos,and Councilmembers Hafner and Wick) 5. - for Bill Gothmann — 4 votes. (Deputy Mayor Woodard, and Councilmembers Pace, Higgins and Wick) Since Mr. Gothmann received a majority vote,no further voting was done and Mr. Gothmann was declared the new temporary councilmember. After City Clerk Bainbridge administered the Oath of Office to Mr. Gothmann, he took his seat at the dais.Mayor Grafos thanked everyone for participating in this process. It was moved by Deputy Mayor Woodard, seconded and unanimously agreed to adjourn. The meeting adjourned at 5:17 p.m. ATTEST: Dean Grafos,Mayor Christine Bainbridge,City Clerk Special Meeting:June 15,2015 Page 2 of 2 Approved by Council: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution 15-005: Adoption of the 2016 —2021 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35.77.010, Perpetual advanced Six-Year plans for coordinated transportation program expenditures. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Info Only RCA, April 28, 2015; Admin Report on May 5, 2015; and Public Hearing June 9, 2015 for the Draft 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP. BACKGROUND: The City is required by RCW 35.77.010 to prepare and after public hearing adopt a revised and extended comprehensive transportation program for the ensuing six calendar years. This plan must be submitted to the Washington State Department of Transportation before July 1st of each year. The attached draft Six-Year TIP incorporates comments from the Council discussion on May 5, 2015. The new projects added to the Draft 2016-2021 TIP include: Added Projects: • Mirabeau Pkwy & Pines (SR-27) Traffic Signal • Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp, Mission & Park (Obtained Funding- 2015 CDBG) • Mission & Pines (SR-27) Intersection Imp Project (Identified in University Rd Overpass Study) • Sullivan-Trent (SR-290) to Wellesley Corridor Lighting (Identified in Sullivan Road Corridor Study) • Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Project (Identified in Sullivan Road Corridor Study) • Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project • Evergreen & Broadway ITS (City ITS Implementation Plan) • Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin (Divided original project into two parts, "Evergreen to Sullivan"& "Sullivan to Corbin') • Argonne Rd & 1-90 Interchange Bridge Widening (Identified in University Rd Overpass Study) Rescheduled Projects: • Sprague / Barker Intersection Improvements (Rescheduled to 2016) • Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair Project (Rescheduled to 2016) • Saltese/Sullivan Traffic Signal (Rescheduled beyond six years) • Opportunity Elementary, SRTS (Bowdish Road) - (Renamed `Bowdish Sidewalk-8th to 12th."Rescheduled to 2018-19) • Appleway Trail - University Rd. to Balfour Park (Rescheduled to 2018) • Broadway at Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersections (CN Only) - (Rescheduled to 2019) • Broadway Improvement Project - Flora to Barker (Rescheduled PE to 2019) • Mission Ave. - Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) - (CN rescheduled to 2019) • Pines (SR27)/ BNSF Underpass (PE only) - (PE advanced to 2019) • Barker Rd Improvement Project - Appleway to 1-90 (PE delayed to 2020) • Barker Rd Improvements - South City Limits to Appleway (PE delayed to 2020) • Barker Rd Improvement Project - Spokane River to Euclid (PE delayed to 2021) • Barker Road / BNSF Grade Separation (PE delayed to 2021) This year's TIP continues with an emphasis on street preservation projects in accordance with Council goals. Street Preservation Projects are included for each year in this Six-Year TIP. Staff reviewed historical funding levels for federal, state and City funds from the past five years to estimate projected funding levels available during the next six years. The Six-Year TIP is required to be financially constrained and reflect realistic expectations of annual funding levels. Other needed and worthwhile projects that do not fit within the amount of funding anticipated from state and federal grants and City revenues are listed in the document titled `Projects with No Currently Identified Local Match within Existing Resources.' OPTIONS: 1) Adopt the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP as presented, or 2) Adopt the 2016-2021 Six- Year TIP with revisions. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution No. 15-005, adopting the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP as presented. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed TIP has been developed to account for historical levels of state and federal grant funding assistance. Staff will coordinate with the Finance Department as projects identified in the TIP move forward and as grant opportunities become available to ensure local match requirements can be met. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution #15-005 2) Draft 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP 3) Project Summary Sheets 4) Map of 2015-2020 Six Year TIP Projects DRAFT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 15-005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ADOPTING THE 2016-2021 SIX-YEAR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATED THERETO. WHEREAS, to provide for the proper and necessary development of the street system within the City of Spokane Valley, the City shall, as required by State law, develop and adopt annually a Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ("Six-Year TIP") with such program acting as a guide for the coordinated development of the City's transportation system; and WHEREAS, the Six-Year TIP of the City shall specifically set forth those projects and programs of both City and regional significance that benefit the transportation system and promote public safety and efficient vehicle movements; and WHEREAS, the Six-Year TIP shall be consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan and be adopted following one or more public hearings before the City Council; and WHEREAS, a draft copy of the Six-Year TIP was submitted to the Washington State Department of Commerce and has been reviewed and approved prior to the scheduled adoption of the TIP in accordance with RCW 36.70A.106; and WHEREAS, the City Council conducted a public hearing on June 9, 2015, for the purpose of inviting and receiving public comment on the proposed Six-Year TIP. NOW THEREFORE,be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County,Washington, as follows: The City Council hereby adopts the attached Six-Year TIP for the City of Spokane Valley for the purpose of guiding the design, development and construction of local and regional transportation improvements for the years 2016 through 2021. The City Clerk is directed to file the 2016-2021 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program with the Washington State Secretary of Transportation before July 1. The TIP shall be reviewed at least annually for the purpose of determining the work to be accomplished under the program and the City transportation requirements. Adopted this 23rd day of June,2015. City of Spokane Valley Dean Grafos,Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 15-005,Adopting Six-Year TIP CITY OF .`S , ' !•',11:1 r 1 Mfg .,,. ./1r.;�: Spokane .0`! ': •+Ci L r.`f=: rt a x s tV• ''4l •*1;' '"7,;�'r. ,'7(11°' • • '• •,11.1p.•..t .1 ' City of Spokane Valley .' �L. ::�•f..,,i, :2,4,.1, :. \\\ ., : • rt,... �.�•�,:� Public Works Department ..),.. • •yam. : :;• } %.. :yi .: , ,• •r ;.. • ,- i t ► r=� •r21.' • t , ;%1/2..,.:45N' . I 5Y I�d .=. " DRAFT" 2016 — 2021 Six-Year „ ., -, . • "_ Transportation Improvement Program,: i1{j/!t _... -_� __,....,-„cp.-,.,.,.,..4 June 23, 2015 . , . ,, �_ -- Resolution No. 15-OXX �-- -T ,.. 1 +- • 1 ,-Ii r - f� (1_71-, _ `"' C.tr•:(t�.^-Si • ..'�-�..? . `` `"-, l"j. +' 4. ..` .,• t✓� = -' �. µ♦ �4r"t5.ti . t.4a&:sti -1� �S , N..,:,,,, ,,_- .r•` `i•.T.nr` '33 .11 r _ `�` r1'i+ _ t - v . Cr- 'trW. s - }.. t y -*-__rt.:.....-7.. 5 , ''t 't -r t\ tit ..1''''::.'..'k.. t` K. r 1. L� \ r .., •Lt C_ ,v ti - • .a n s t t • � , \ %'''''' ti rr ••1 s.� \t • • -•:.,j;.-•':;... .-:::-......4:,'-;;; �• :s Y, 'r i• t i.• %•.11: ib .f 1 • •.•!•,...:,,,,-),i',-.,..•: ,• ...(�,]�-' •]� '.?(Z.�•=,s:-:f:>•`�`\t�'� �+/�i�,\•.'';0 � , Jts1:•t -- t 'f r :4. t . E ., •,‘..'- -t. li ;t" ,��(! `�. '( :•-•.s'''' •y�.�; t 1�. t f t �: r • ,�\ .ti{1 r'-f..s' t. .i. 1 ' + •1 ‘...2.!.:,•-•:•.":•.;::,:::;.' •� 1 '' ( ''it ._ / ,. I 9;:J L _:), .:``. �,s'-;.‘"'•‘1.'-• . .�+r 6 , �.•��1 _ ft !'�! ,f.t.`.-4,.� tr -t•. :t `L ',e ,� ..,':' ,., ,2‘.;-;(;":';, ., ,11..E-. t.t\. *.- t.�1r. t- `♦7t •`.� \t ti� •l��t: +�. >h_�N.. .v .4..._ \ .', ..:',1'.:.,:.,...?::,-,:,.1•a.�;:ai -`�:. E�. .•r. �.�.. •:.t{'L...t,...... r....'''`-..1 �2'.•_�\' . \ .l`_i City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works 2016 — 2021 Six-Year CITY OF ll+e Transportation Improvement Program Valley Glossary & Abbreviations Funding Sources: • ARRA American Recovery & Reinvestment Act • BR Bridge Replacement Program Funding Status: • City City Funds • S Project Funding is Secured • CDBG Community Development Block Grant • P Project Funding is Planned. The Most • CMAQ Congestion Management/Air Quality Probable Funding Sources have been • Developers Private Developer Funds Identified. • EECBG Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant • FHWA Federal Highway Administration Project Phases: • FMSIB Freight Mobility Strategic Investment Program • PE Preliminary Engineering • HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program • RW Right-of-Way • HUD Housing & Urban Development • CN Construction • REET Real Estate Excise Tax • Other Fed Misc. Federal Funding Sources Construction Type: • Other RR Railroad Funding • PCC Portland Cement Concrete • Other State Misc. State Funding Sources • HMA Hot Mix Asphalt • SP TIB Sidewalk Program • ITS Intelligent Transportation System • SRTS Safe Routes to School (Integrated Traffic Signal Control Systems) • SW City Stormwater Funds • S/W Sidewalk • STA Spokane Transit Authority • STP(E) Surface Transportation Program (Enhancement) • STP(U) Surface Transportation Program (Urban) • TA Transportation Alternatives Street Functional Classifications: • TIB Transportation Improvement Board Urban: • UAP TIB Urban Arterial Program • 14 Principal Arterial • UCP TIB Urban Corridor Program • 16 Minor Arterial • WSDOT Washington Department of Transportation • 17 Collector Arterial • WTSC Washington Traffic Safety Commission • 19 Local Access • WUTC Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission {,r,,„ Draft 2016 - 2021 p'Ue Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program .00•0 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 1 Sullivan Road West Bridge 0.08 0 0 5,064 5,064 BR 1,711 1,711 S City 536 536 FMSIB 600 600 Reconstruct and widen west(southbound)bridge Other 1,167 1,167 Fed TIB 1,050 1,050 Recv'd FMSIB, BR&TIB grants;City Project#0155 Project Total 5,064 5,064 2 Mission Ave. -Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (PE/RW) 1 155 160 0 316 City 43 43 S STP(U) 273 273 Reconstruct with curb,sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities; PE&RW Funding Secured,(SRTC#09-01) City Project#0123, Project Total 316 316 3 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates 0 0 0 72 72 City S HSIP 72 72 New Traffic Signal Backplates at 10 City Intersections 2015-2017 HSIP Grant Award Project Total 72 72 4 McDonald Rd ROAD DIET, 16th to Mission 2 28 0 545 574 HSIP 571 571 S City 3 3 Bike Lanes,traffic signal modifications,new ADA sidewalk ramps at traffic signals. Project Total 574 574 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 1 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 5 Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp, Mission& 0.25 42 0 319 361 City 30 30 p Park CDBG 331 331 Construct ADA sidewalk&curb ramps on the South side of Mission from Lily to Park,and along Park north along the school and E Spokane Grange frontage Project Total 361 361 6 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 0 39 12 422 472 City 12 211 223 P DEV 38 211 249 Intersection improvements to improve capacity Developer+City Partnership Project Total 50 422 472 7 2016 Street Preservation Project 0 100 0 2,100 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing,yearly Project Total 2,200 2,200 8 Appleway- Park to Dishman Mica Preservation 1.1 83 0 1,071 1,154 City 11 145 156 S STP(U) 72 926 998 Grind and Overlay,ADA Upgrades Funded with STP(U)funds. Project Total 83 1,071 1,154 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 2 err,or Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program 400110 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 9 Appleway Trail-Pines to Evergreen 1 146 0 1,885 2,030 City 31 405 436 S STP(U) 69 901 970 TAP 45 579 624 Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned RR R-O-W Funded with STP(U)funds. Project Total 145 1,885 2,030 10 Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair 0 29 0 172 201 City 201 201 p Project Repair bridge expansion joints on RR overpass Project Total 201 201 11 Maribeau Pkwy&Pine(SR-27)Traffic Signal 0.1 30 0 320 350 City 350 350 P New Traffic Signal Traffic Signal PE&CN,beginning 2016 Project Total 350 350 12 2017 Street Preservation Project 0 100 0 2,100 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing,yearly Project Total 2,200 2,200 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 3 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 13 Argonne-Broadway to Indiana 0.8 64 0 576 640 City 9 78 87 S STP(U) 55 498 553 Pavement Preservation-Grind and Overlay Funded with STP(U)funds. Project Total 64 576 640 14 Mission&Pines(SR-27) Intersection Imp Project 0.2 35 50 250 336 City 34 34 P HSIP 302 302 Intersection lane reconfiguration and ROW on East and West Approches on Mission Project Total 336 336 15 Opportunity Elementary, SRTS(Bowdish Road) 0.25 90 6 404 500 City 12 56 68 P TAP 79 353 432 Construct sidewalk along the east side of Bowdish from 8th to 12th,and along the south side of 11th from Bowdish to Wilbur TA Grant Application for 2018-2020 grant cycle Project Total 91 409 500 16 Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW/CN) 0 0 26 2,082 2,108 City 421 421 p TIB 1,687 1,687 Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement PE Obligated 9/2010 Project Total 2,108 2,108 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 4 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program 400110 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 17 North Sullivan ITS Project 1.75 105 0 809 914 City 14 109 123 S CMAQ 91 700 791 Extend ITS conduit and contols along Sullivan Corridor CMAQ Funded Project Total 105 809 914 18 Sullivan-Trent(SR-290)to Wellesley Corridor 0.3 90 50 600 740 City 12 62 74 p Lighting HSIP 104 562 666 Street lighting, ROW Project Total 116 624 740 19 Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Project 0.25 198 110 1,062 1,368 City 34 150 184 P CMAQ 218 966 1,184 Traffic Signal or Roundabout Project Total 252 1,116 1,368 20 2018 Street Preservation Project o 100 0 2,100 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing,yearly Project Total 2,200 2,200 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 5 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 21 Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan 1 164 0 1,481 1,645 City 22 200 222 p CMAQ 142 1,281 1,423 Construct Shared Use Pathway along abandoned Railroad Right-of-Way Project Total 164 1,481 1,645 22 Appleway Trail- University Rd. to Balfour Park 0.5 100 130 520 750 City 32 70 102 P TAP 198 450 648 Extend Shared Use pathway to Balfour Park Project Total 230 520 750 23 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- 1-90 to 0.25 512 0 3,211 3,723 City 102 642 744 p Montgomery TIB 410 2,569 2,979 Reconstruct pavement in concrete; OCI Mullan to Knox 24, OCI Knox to Montgomery 35(2014 Rpt) Project Total 512 3,211 3,723 24 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project 1 140 30 830 1,000 City 152 848 1,000 P Infill gaps in Sidewalks and add sidewalks to access completed portions of the Appleway Trail. Project Total 152 848 1,000 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 6 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 25 Evergreen Resurfacing-Mission Connector to 0.7 80 0 580 660 City 6 84 90 s Indiana STP(U) 34 536 570 Grind and inlay HMA, Bike Lane Positive Guidance thru the 1-90 EXIT 291-A Project Total 40 620 660 26 Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin Preservation 0.85 177 0 1,593 1,770 City 24 215 239 S STP(U) 153 1,378 1,531 Pavement Preservation,ADA upgrade Funded with STP(U)funds. Project Total 177 1,593 1,770 27 2019 Street Preservation Project 0 100 0 2,100 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing,yearly Project Total 2,200 2,200 28 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete 0 0 0 1,703 1,703 City 230 230 p Intersections(CN Only) STP(U) 1,473 1,473 Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement ROW Obligated 11/2013 Project Total 1,703 1,703 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 7 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 29 Broadway Improvement Project- Flora to 0 543 500 4,163 5,206 City 159 883 1,042 p Barker TIB 634 3,530 4,164 Extend Broadway arterial to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker 3-Lane Urban Section Project Total 793 4,413 5,206 30 Evergreen& Broadway ITS 2 206 80 1,584 1,870 City 36 217 253 P CMAQ 230 1,387 1,617 ITS along Broadway from Pines Rd(SR-27)to Evergreen,along Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Ave. 2018-2020 CMAQ Grant Application funding Project Total 266 1,604 1,870 31 Mission Ave. -Flora Rd. to Barker Rd. (CN) 1 0 0 3,697 3,701 City 499 499 P TIB 1,601 1,601 STP(U) 1,601 1,601 Widen&Overlay with curb,sidewalks,bike lanes and stormwater facilities Project Total 3,701 3,701 32 Park Road#2-Broadway to Indiana(RW&CN) 0.75 0 150 2,877 3,027 City 20 388 408 p STP(U) 130 2,489 2,619 Reconstruct to a 3-lane section with curb,sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities PE Funding 6/2009 Project Total 150 2,877 3,027 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 8 e—lerrY 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program 400110 Valley Dollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 33 Pines(SR27)/ BNSF Underpass-(PE only) 0 3,000 0 0 3,002 City 128 128 256 p Other 1,298 1,298 2,596 Fed Other- 75 75 150 RR Railroad underpass at Pines(SR-27)/BNSF/Trent Project Total 1,501 1,501 3,002 34 2020 Street Preservation Project 0 100 0 2,100 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing,yearly Project Total 2,200 2,200 35 Appleway Trail-Sullivan to Corbin 1.33 200 0 2,200 2,400 City 27 297 324 p CMAQ 173 1,903 2,076 Shared Use Path along Old Milwaukee R/R ROW Project Total 200 2,200 2,400 36 Barker Rd-Euclid to Flora Road 0.75 471 100 3,613 4,184 City 114 723 837 p TIB 457 2,890 3,347 Reconstruct Barker to 3-lane urban section Project Total 571 3,613 4,184 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 9 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 37 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Appleway to I- 0.28 382 1,146 2,397 3,629 City 167 324 491 p 90 STP(U) 1,065 2,073 3,138 Widen and improve to 5-lane urban section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway Project Total 1,232 2,397 3,629 38 Barker Rd Improvements-South City Limits to 0.81 326 25 2,502 2,854 City 46 340 386 p Appleway TIB 293 2,175 2,468 Widen and Improve roadway to 3-lane urban section Project Total 339 2,515 2,854 39 2021 Street Preservation Project 0 100 0 2,100 2,200 City 2,200 2,200 P Pavement Preservation Projects: Fund 311 Ongoing,yearly Project Total 2,200 2,200 40 Argonne Rd& 1-90 IC Bridge Widening 0.1 800 0 0 800 City 160 160 p FMSIB 640 640 Widen Argonne Rd Bridge to 3 Lanes,SB. New 12' sidewalks. Project Total 800 800 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 10 efr, Draft 2016 - 2021 Spokane Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program ValleyDollars in Thousands Funding Project/Description/Current Status Length PE RW CN Total Sources 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total 41 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Spokane 0.53 378 25 0 403 City 52 52 p River to Euclid TIB 322 322 DEV 29 29 Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane urban section Developer Funds Rec'd 6/2014,$29,500 Project Total 403 403 42 Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation 0.5 1,538 450 0 1,988 City 308 308 P Other 180 180 Fed Other 1,500 1,500 State Construct Grade Separation at Barker/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290) Other- RR Other Fed FY09 Federal Earmark for$720K,20%of CN(up to$10M)received from FMSIB FMSIB Project Total 1,988 1,988 Totals: 10,751 3,050 61,204 75,004 9,416 6,422 7,712 20,112 14,937 16,116 74,715 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 11 �II1(3 Draft 2016 - 2021 If-4( Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Walley Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program Totals Secured Projects Planned Projects Totals Year Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total Federal State Other City Total 2016 $3,980 $1,650 $0 $624 $6,254 $331 $0 $38 $2,793 $3,162 $4,311 $1,650 $38 $3,417 $9,416 2017 $1,072 $0 $0 $168 $1,240 $406 $1,687 $211 $2,878 $5,182 $1,478 $1,687 $211 $3,046 $6,422 2018 $2,865 $0 $0 $622 $3,487 $1,199 $410 $0 $2,616 $4,225 $4,064 $410 $0 $3,238 $7,712 2019 $1,914 $0 $0 $299 $2,213 $7,782 $4,804 $75 $5,238 $17,899 $9,696 $4,804 $75 $5,537 $20,112 2020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,412 $4,280 $75 $4,170 $14,937 $6,412 $4,280 $75 $4,170 $14,937 2021 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,156 $7,527 $29 $4,404 $16,116 $4,156 $7,527 $29 $4,404 $16,116 Total $9,831 $1,650 $0 $1,713 $13,194 $20,286 $18,708 $428 $22,099 $61,521 $30,117 $20,358 $428 $23,812 $74,715 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances, and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. 6/3/2015 Page 1 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects w/No Currently Identified Local Match Within Existing Resources Dollars in Thousands Project Name Description Total Cost Wellesley Realignment @ Realign connection of Wellesley to Barker Rd and $5,187 Barker/SR290 SR290, 3-lane section, Part of Barker/BNSF Grade Separation Bowdish Road-16th to Sprague Sprague to 8th: Inlay&Enhancement;8th to $2,858 16th: Reconstruct as 2-lane section w/curb, sidewalk, bike lanes and new stormwater facilities Bowdish Road-24th to 16th Reconstruct Roadway as 2-lane section w/curb, $2,846 sidewalk and new stormwater facilities; Bowdish Road-32nd to 24th Reconstruct Roadway as 2-lane section w/curb, $2,637 sidewalk and new stormwater facilities; Bowdish Sidewalk- 12th to 16th Construct Sidewalk along both sides of Bowdish $557 Park Road#2 Sidewalk Project- Construct sidewalk along one side of Park Road $143 Marietta Ave.to Buckeye Ave. and 160-ft gap on north side of Buckeye Ave east of Park Road Park Road/BNSF Grade Separation Reconstruct Park Road to separate the grades of $18,993 Park Road and the BNSF railroad tracks. Pavement Management Program- Annual street preservation projects $11,664 Local Access Pines(SR27)/BNSF Underpass Construct grade separation at Pines Rd(SR-27)/ $17,184 (RW,CN Only) Trent Ave(SR 290)/BNSF RR Pines Corridor ITS-Sprague to 16th Traffic Signal Control System for Corridor $785 Sprague/Argonne-Mullan Concrete Reconstruct intersections in concrete pavement $2,342 Intersections Sprague/Fancher Concrete Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement $1,572 Intersection Sprague/Thierman Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement $1,243 Intersection Sprague/University Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement. $1,660 Intersection Sullivan/Kiernan Concrete Reconstruct Intersection in concrete pavement $1,423 Intersection Sullivan/Marietta Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete pavement $1,493 Intersection Sullivan Rd/BNSF Grade Upgrade and widen grade separation at $16,150 Separation Improvements Sullivan/BNSF/Trent(SR290) Totals: $88,737 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 1 of 1 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Arterial Improvements Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Mission Ave.-Flora Rd.to Barker Reconstruct with curb,sidewalks, 2016 $43 $316 Rd.(PE/RW) bike lanes and stormwater facilities; Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Traffic Signal or Roundabout 2018 $184 $1,368 Project Broadway Improvement Project- Extend Broadway arterial to Barker 2019 $1,042 $5,206 Flora to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker Mission Ave.-Flora Rd.to Barker Widen&Overlay with curb, 2019 $499 $3,701 Rd. (CN) sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Park Road#2-Broadway to Indiana Reconstruct to a 3-lane section with 2019 $408 $3,027 (RW&CN) curb,sidewalks,bike lanes and stormwater facilities Pines(5R27)/BNSF Underpass- Railroad underpass at Pines(SR-27) 2019 $256 $3,002 (PE only) /BNSF/Trent Barker Rd-Euclid to Flora Road Reconstruct Barker to 3-lane urban 2020 $837 $4,184 section Barker Rd Improvement Project- Widen and improve to 5-lane urban 2020 $491 $3,629 Appleway to 1-90 section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway Barker Rd Improvements-South City Widen and Improve roadway to 3- 2020 $386 $2,854 Limits to Appleway lane urban section Barker Rd Improvement Project- Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane 2021 $52 $403 Spokane River to Euclid urban section Total: $4,198 $27,690 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 1 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Bridge Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Sullivan Road West Bridge Reconstruct and widen west 2016 $536 $5,064 (southbound)bridge Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair bridge expansion joints on RR 2016 $201 $201 Repair Project overpass Argonne Rd&I-90 IC Bridge Widen Argonne Rd Bridge to 3 2021 $160 $800 Widening Lanes,SB. New 12' sidewalks. Barker Road/BNSF Grade Construct Grade Separation at 2021 $308 $1,988 Separation Barker/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290) Total: $1,205 $8,053 Congestion Improvements Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Sprague/Barker Intersection Intersection improvements to improve 2016 $223 $472 Improvements capacity Total: $223 $472 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 2 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Pedestrian/Bicycle Program Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp, Construct ADA sidewalk&curb 2016 $30 $361 Mission&Park ramps on the South side of Mission from Lily to Park,and along Park north along the school and E Spokane Grange frontage Appleway Trail-Pines to Evergreen Construct Shared Use Pathway along 2016 $436 $2,030 abandoned RR R-O-W Opportunity Elementary,SRTS Construct sidewalk along the east 2017 $68 $500 (Bowdish Road) side of Bowdish from 8th to 12th,and along the south side of 11th from Bowdish to Wilbur Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Sullivan Construct Shared Use Pathway along 2018 $222 $1,645 abandoned Railroad Right-of-Way Appleway Trail-University Rd.to Extend Shared Use pathway to 2018 $102 $750 Balfour Park Balfour Park Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project Infill gaps in Sidewalks and add 2018 $1,000 $1,000 sidewalks to access completed portions of the Appleway Trail. Appleway Trail-Sullivan to Corbin Shared Use Path along Old 2020 $324 $2,400 Milwaukee R/R ROW Total: $2,182 $8,686 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 3 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Safety Program Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates New Traffic Signal Backplates at 10 2016 $0 $72 City Intersections McDonald Rd ROAD DIET, 16th to Bike Lanes,traffic signal 2016 $3 $574 Mission modifications, new ADA sidewalk ramps at traffic signals. Mission&Pines(SR-27)Intersection Intersection lane reconfiguration and 2017 $34 $336 Imp Project ROW on East and West Approches on Mission Sullivan-Trent(SR-290)to Wellesley Street lighting, ROW 2017 $74 $740 Corridor Lighting Total: $111 $1,722 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 4 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Street Preservation Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost 2016 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: 2016 $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Appleway-Park to Dishman Mica Grind and Overlay,ADA Upgrades 2016 $156 $1,154 Preservation 2017 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: 2017 $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Argonne-Broadway to Indiana Pavement Preservation-Grind and 2017 $87 $640 Overlay 2018 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: 2018 $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Evergreen Resurfacing-Mission Grind and inlay HMA, Bike Lane 2018 $90 $660 Connector to Indiana Positive Guidance thru the 1-90 EXIT 291-A Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin Pavement Preservation,ADA upgrade 2018 $239 $1,770 Preservation 2019 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: 2019 $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 2020 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: 2020 $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 2021 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: 2021 $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Total: $13,772 $17,424 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 5 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Street Reconstruction Projects Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete 2017 $421 $2,108 Intersection(RW/CN) pavement Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- Reconstruct pavement in concrete; 2018 $744 $3,723 1-90 to Montgomery DCI Mullan to Knox 24, OCI Knox to Montgomery 35(2014 Rpt) Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Reconstruct intersections in concrete 2019 $230 $1,703 Concrete Intersections(CN Only) pavement Total: $1,395 $7,534 Traffic Operations and Maintenance Project Name Description Start Year City Cost Total Cost Maribeau Pkwy&Pine(SR-27) New Traffic Signal 2016 $350 $350 Traffic Signal North Sullivan ITS Project Extend ITS conduit and contols along 2017 $123 $914 Sullivan Corridor Evergreen&Broadway ITS ITS along Broadway from Pines Rd 2019 $253 $1,870 (SR-27)to Evergreen,along Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Ave. Total: $726 $3,134 Overall Total: $23,812 $74,715 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 6 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Total Project Costs (Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP) Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Arterial Improvements Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Mission Ave.-Flora Rd.to Barker Reconstruct with curb,sidewalks, $124 $918 Rd.(PE/RW) bike lanes and stormwater facilities; Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Traffic Signal or Roundabout $185 $1,370 Project Broadway Improvement Project- Extend Broadway arterial to Barker $1,042 $5,206 Flora to Barker Rd, Realign Broadway connection east of Barker Mission Ave.-Flora Rd.to Barker Widen&Overlay with curb, $499 $3,697 Rd. (CN) sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Park Road#2-Broadway to Indiana Reconstruct to a 3-lane section with $418 $3,102 (RW&CN) curb,sidewalks, bike lanes and stormwater facilities Pines(5R27)/BNSF Underpass- Railroad underpass at Pines(SR-27) $255 $3,000 (PE only) /BNSF/Trent Barker Rd-Euclid to Flora Road Reconstruct Barker to 3-lane urban $837 $4,184 section Barker Rd Improvement Project- Widen and improve to 5-lane urban $491 $3,925 Appleway to 1-90 section, Roundabout @ Broadway, Realign east leg of Broadway Barker Rd Improvements-South Widen and Improve roadway to 3- $385 $2,853 City Limits to Appleway lane urban section Barker Rd Improvement Project- Reconstruct and widen to 3-lane $632 $3,302 Spokane River to Euclid urban section Total: $4,868 $31,557 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 1 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Total Project Costs (Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP) Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Bridge Projects Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Sullivan Road West Bridge Reconstruct and widen west $2,360 $19,750 (southbound)bridge Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair bridge expansion joints on RR $201 $201 Repair Project overpass Argonne Rd&I-90 IC Bridge Widen Argonne Rd Bridge to 3 $1,600 $8,000 Widening Lanes,SB. New 12' sidewalks. Barker Road/BNSF Grade Construct Grade Separation at $2,910 $29,200 Separation Barker/BNSF RR/Trent(SR290) Total: $7,071 $57,151 Congestion Improvements Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Sprague/Barker Intersection Intersection improvements to $223 $489 Improvements improve capacity Total: $223 $489 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 2 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Total Project Costs (Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP) Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Pedestrian/Bicycle Program Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp, Construct ADA sidewalk&curb $32 $389 Mission&Park ramps on the South side of Mission from Lily to Park,and along Park north along the school and E Spokane Grange frontage Appleway Trail-Pines to Evergreen Construct Shared Use Pathway $450 $2,093 along abandoned RR R-O-W Opportunity Elementary, SRTS Construct sidewalk along the east $68 $500 (Bowdish Road) side of Bowdish from 8th to 12th,and along the south side of 11th from Bowdish to Wilbur Appleway Trail-Evergreen to Construct Shared Use Pathway $222 $1,645 Sullivan along abandoned Railroad Right-of- Way Appleway Trail-University Rd.to Extend Shared Use pathway to $102 $750 Balfour Park Balfour Park Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project Infill gaps in Sidewalks and add $1,000 $1,000 sidewalks to access completed portions of the Appleway Trail. Appleway Trail-Sullivan to Corbin Shared Use Path along Old $324 $2,400 Milwaukee R/R ROW Total: $2,198 $8,777 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 3 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Total Project Costs (Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP) Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Safety Program Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates New Traffic Signal Backplates at 10 $1 $81 City Intersections McDonald Rd ROAD DIET, 16th to Bike Lanes,traffic signal $7 $616 Mission modifications, new ADA sidewalk ramps at traffic signals. Mission&Pines(SR-27)Intersection Intersection lane reconfiguration and $34 $335 Imp Project ROW on East and West Approches on Mission Sullivan-Trent(SR-290)to Wellesley Street lighting, ROW $74 $740 Corridor Lighting Total: $116 $1,772 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 4 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Total Project Costs (Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP) Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Street Preservation Projects Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost 2016 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Appleway-Park to Dishman Mica Grind and Overlay,ADA Upgrades $161 $1,190 Preservation 2017 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Argonne-Broadway to Indiana Pavement Preservation-Grind and $87 $640 Overlay 2018 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Evergreen Resurfacing-Mission Grind and inlay HMA, Bike Lane $89 $660 Connector to Indiana Positive Guidance thru the 1-90 EXIT 291-A Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin Pavement Preservation,ADA $239 $1,770 Preservation upgrade 2019 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 2020 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 2021 Street Preservation Project Pavement Preservation Projects: $2,200 $2,200 Fund 311 Total: $13,776 $17,460 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 5 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Total Project Costs (Including costs before and beyond the six years of this TIP) Projects Listed by Category for the 2016-2021 Six-Year TIP Dollars in Thousands Street Reconstruction Projects Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Reconstruct intersection in concrete $421 $2,108 Intersection(RW/CN) pavement Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- Reconstruct pavement in concrete; $744 $3,723 1-90 to Montgomery DCI Mullan to Knox 24, OCI Knox to Montgomery 35(2014 Rpt) Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Reconstruct intersections in concrete $230 $1,703 Concrete Intersections(CN Only) pavement Total: $1,395 $7,534 Traffic Operations and Maintenance Project Name Description City Cost Total Cost Maribeau Pkwy&Pine(SR-27) New Traffic Signal $350 $350 Traffic Signal North Sullivan ITS Project Extend ITS conduit and contols along $123 $914 Sullivan Corridor Evergreen&Broadway ITS ITS along Broadway from Pines Rd $253 $1,870 (SR-27)to Evergreen,along Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Ave. Total: $726 $3,134 Overall Total: $30,373 $127,874 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 6 of 6 City of Spokane Valley Department of Public Works Six Year Transportation Improvement Program 2016 - 2021 Dollars in Thousands 2016 Item# Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 1 Sullivan Road West Bridge BR 536 5,064 2 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd.to Barker Rd. (PE/RW) STP(U) 43 316 3 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates HSIP 0 72 4 McDonald Rd ROAD DIET, 16th to Mission HSIP 3 574 5 Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp, Mission & CDBG 30 361 Park 6 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements DEV 12 50 7 2016 Street Preservation Project City 2,200 2,200 8 Appleway-Park to Dishman Mica Preservation STP(U) 11 83 9 Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergreen STP(U) 31 145 10 Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair Project City 201 201 11 Maribeau Pkwy &Pine(SR-27)Traffic Signal City 350 350 2016 Totals: $3,417 $9,416 2017 Item# Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 6 Sprague/ Barker Intersection Improvements DEV 211 422 8 Appleway-Park to Dishman Mica Preservation STP(U) 145 1,071 12 2017 Street Preservation Project City 2,200 2,200 13 Argonne-Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 9 64 14 Mission & Pines(SR-27) Intersection Imp Project HSIP 34 336 16 Sullivan/Euclid Concrete Intersection (RW/CN) TIB 421 2,108 17 North Sullivan ITS Project CMAQ 14 105 18 Sullivan-Trent(SR-290)to Wellesley Corridor HSIP 12 116 Lighting 2017 Totals: $3,046 $6,422 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 1 of 3 2018 Item# Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 9 Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergreen STP(U) 405 1,885 13 Argonne-Broadway to Indiana STP(U) 78 576 15 Opportunity Elementary, SRTS(Bowdish Road) TAP 12 91 17 North Sullivan ITS Project CMAQ 109 809 18 Sullivan-Trent(SR-290)to Wellesley Corridor HSIP 62 624 Lighting 19 Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Project CMAQ 34 252 20 2018 Street Preservation Project City 2,200 2,200 21 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan CMAQ 22 164 22 Appleway Trail - University Rd.to Balfour Park TAP 32 230 23 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement-1-90 to TIB 102 512 Montgomery 24 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project City 152 152 25 Evergreen Resurfacing- Mission Connector to STP(U) 6 40 Indiana 26 Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin Preservation STP(U) 24 177 2018 Totals: $3,238 $7,712 2010 Item# Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 15 Opportunity Elementary, SRTS(Bowdish Road) TAP 56 409 19 Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Imp Project CMAQ 150 1,116 21 Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan CMAQ 200 1,481 22 Appleway Trail - University Rd.to Balfour Park TAP 70 520 23 Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- 1-90 to TIB 642 3,211 Montgomery 24 Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project City 848 848 25 Evergreen Resurfacing- Mission Connector to STP(U) 84 620 Indiana 26 Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin Preservation STP(U) 215 1,593 27 2019 Street Preservation Project City 2,200 2,200 28 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete STP(U) 230 1,703 Intersections(CN Only) 29 Broadway Improvement Project- Flora to Barker TIB 159 793 30 Evergreen&Broadway ITS CMAQ 36 266 31 Mission Ave. - Flora Rd.to Barker Rd. (CN) STP(U) 499 3,701 32 Park Road#2- Broadway to Indiana (RW&CN) STP(U) 20 150 33 Pines(SR27)/BNSF Underpass-(PE only) Other Fed 128 1,501 2019 Totals: $5,537 $20,112 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Funded Projects are shown in Blue Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 2 of 3 2020 Item# Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 29 Broadway Improvement Project- Flora to Barker TIB 883 4,413 30 Evergreen &Broadway ITS CMAQ 217 1,604 32 Park Road#2- Broadway to Indiana (RW&CN) STP(U) 388 2,877 33 Pines (SR27)/BNSF Underpass-(PE only) Other Fed 128 1,501 34 2020 Street Preservation Project City 2,200 2,200 35 Appleway Trail -Sullivan to Corbin CMAQ 27 200 36 Barker Rd- Euclid to Flora Road TIB 114 571 37 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Appleway to I- STP(U) 167 1,232 90 38 Barker Rd Improvements- South City Limits to TIB 46 339 Appleway 2020 Totals: $4,170 $14,937 2021 Item# Project Name Primary Source City Amount Total Amount 35 Appleway Trail-Sullivan to Corbin CMAQ 297 2,200 36 Barker Rd- Euclid to Flora Road TIB 723 3,613 37 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Appleway to I- STP(U) 324 2,397 90 38 Barker Rd Improvements- South City Limits to TIB 340 2,515 Appleway 39 2021 Street Preservation Project City 2,200 2,200 40 Argonne Rd & I-90 IC Bridge Widening FMSIB 160 800 41 Barker Rd Improvement Project-Spokane River TIB 52 403 to Euclid 42 Barker Road/BNSF Grade Separation Other State 308 1,988 2021 Totals: $4,404 $16,116 Projects and timeframes identified in the TIP are to be considered estimates only that may change due to a variety of circumstances,and are not intended by the City to be relied upon by property owners or developers in making development decisions. Added Projects are shown in Green Rescheduled Projects shown in Orange Funded Projects are shown in Blue Wednesday,June 03,2015 Page 3 of 3 1. Sullivan Road West Bridge S"pcikan ``� 1M&uey V-1 P"OVERLOOK 36'S' AT PIER 3 OUT TO DUT BECK WIDTH OUT TO OUT DECK WIDTH s s 12'-U" 12'--0" 13'-6" 14%-q_ 14-1J f WALKWAY MULTI-USE TURN LAME LANE I LANE I•TURN LANE NB LANE- N9 LANE r PATH 1 � _ _ I R �I 9 7 2016 —1 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The construction of the Sullivan Road West Bridge began in 2014 and is scheduled to be completed in 2016. This project replaces the 60-year-old southbound bridge and will include 4 traffic lanes and a widened sidewalk. The widened sidewalk will provide access for people north of the Spokane River to the Centennial Trail and the regional commercial area along Indiana and Sullivan Road south of 1-90. Benefits of Project: The Sullivan Road bridges crossing the Spokane River are a vital connection to the City's industrial land uses,the state highway at Trent(SR-290),the future Bigelow Gulch Road to North Spokane,the Interstate and the Commercial and Retail Hub along Indiana Avenue. The corridor,carrying more than 25,900 vehicles per day,with a very high truck volume of about 24 percent,is a key component to the City's future and this project will guarantee adequate capacity for future City growth. Project Cost Estimate: The project is expected to be completed by the end of 2016 and the budget to complete the project in 2016 is $5,064,000. The project is fully funded using City, FHWA Bridge, FMSIB,and TIB funds. I o ane 2. & 31. Mission Ave-Flora Rd to Barker Rd Valley ,.i - F - a '4.' 's v- '� �~ _ .,,,11•�7A.0_,',"~: n , ' ' - �� End nave '-Pi. r :r' f 4t,y1, ''AM r c... 6 y ,-` .. ° •a " • Barker d - ,Mission Ave-Flora to =,L ', 4.•i . ,, Barker Road , ' -44-...t4.„ ,91. , M r - _..• -.,r—r - {� d IS - f -r 3E sw W ., ` • n IS_ mo- .• • , 7 •• L_ Y i'v.. ` ,.�y •'OM1j + 1 l Flora i E-Vlazvve.1-Ave +, ' INVR W. r� y SES. la Ave _ +` r' r l- -• F; k•*144... • J Of •j. ' r il'1� +�' _.0 r^�,A-tet SYl2r•p C'JE�'1) .. .., • r °Jf76"A�ve - 1. ■1 i - t.6 a ,I rizwith . -- Greenacres ' ----- j. _ �•T!..' & ' .rte Z, - . ,_ l Y'^'• 1. / , '� . r' �GataidCper4ve >R J- 1'i , i,4 "'Wk �,_ _ �" ,.. �rlf __. , ,,, - \\)::_,.\\ , �; .., , ___ a_ _ ' P._ . _ ' s, F Ddu^';*� r _ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Mission Ave from Flora Road to Barker Road will be constructed to a 3-lane urban section with bike lanes in each direction. Mission is a minor arterial that connects the major commercial districts along Sullivan and Indiana to the North Greenacres Neighborhood and Liberty Lake. The route currently carries approximately 2,700 vehicles per day, but this is expected to significantly increase to a 20-year projected ADT of 11,400. Benefits of Project: The project will accommodate the rapidly growing neighborhoods surrounding the project. Greenacres Park has recently been built on the south end of Long Road and a new elementary school is proposed for the SW corner of the intersection of Mission and Long. The school and the park will generate significant pedestrian traffic from the surrounding neighborhood along Mission Ave.The pro- ject also improves access to two trailheads for the Centennial Trail along the Spokane River at the north end of Flora Road and the west end of Old Mission Ave. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$155,000 Right of Way(RW)-$160,000 Construction (CN)=$3,697,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$4,012,000 The Design and Right of way for this project is fully funded with Federal STP(U) and City matching funds and is expected to be com- pleted in 2016 and the Construction phase of the project is expected to be completed in the 2019 construction season. 3. Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates CITY WIDE — REFLECTIVE BACK PLATES HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) -- f -.- - -1---t I �— — . ter _ _--� I 0 �' I= --- zl I i EFGH ANE RIVE.4 -+y�� l I cow fwITY^ -� " OAF" rR ' A a - f AINTERSTRTE Pr- - ME . LE r kkk� � c. -. _ 1 _— - - LIBERT" '"ul I ro i. ��` i -r •nr I LAKE A. f,T1 = '41 - T7tr(U �_ri es-' ,_ 1— _ 32.4.1 � � �cr.n J l NOTE`:,' a1 1 �iii oxx� REFLECTIVE BACK HSIP PLATE, <:ITY SVIaE---EFLECTI'vE E'Ai`FCPLAT=S SIGMA!UPO ADE /IcINITY MAP CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ,..:T TO SCALE 2016 I 2017 I 2018 I 2019 I 2020 I 2021 Project Description: This project will add 3-inch reflectorized borders to traffic signal backplates at 10 city intersections. This work will enhance traffic signal visibility at night as _ outlined in the guidelines set forth in the 2009 Edition of the Manual on Uni- form Traffic Control Devices(MUTCD),Section 4D.12. Per the manual,traffic signal backplates should be used to enhance signal face target value,and a retroreflective strip along the perimeter of the backplate should be used to II so project a rectangle appearance at night. In addition to the reflective back- ......, plates, many of the existing traffic signal heads have outlived their service lives and will be replaced. WSDOT has installed similar backplates at their traffic signals with speeds of 45 miles per hour(mph)or greater and at locations where they have determined that retroreflective backplates enhance the con- trast between the traffic signal indications and their surroundings for both day and night conditions. Benefits of Project: The use of backplates with retroreflective borders may result in a 15 percent reduction in all crashes at urban,signalized intersec- tions. Project Cost Estimate: Construction (CN)-$72,000 This project is fully funded using City and HSIP funds. 4. McDonald Rd ROAD DIET 16th to Mission okan `eY Valley ertairfiremzzaz • _ �`w, if.:_- :".- Yom. .�-`Ewlifisink_ii ....vi Fi7 �`4V _'.Jh.; -1-44-- - - - - --1 Mission Ave �spckarla„,.yalley .--. -_-. -. �, r ..' +v. "•�- _ i.. 4F' �_ LCA- 3 F .- ,� .. ----------.,--__,,,....1- '..''..- - '. _•. a }` — Y 4. ` A1 .1'it) e =t;' s3 t+''`} a • p . . _ z : . -®- 4 _- McDonald Rd Road Diet ._ ,,A1,42 it,,,, -' '.• �--- = o Mission � � p" • ��nth t fes. .+w t4 J�at �`' " r, '`-F ` �► t "" t + `- 4f" _ jF .F, • • �._ ' :, `. • ^err 7x E.,'.r ,- _ _... " .3 •. ., fJ 1 . +e` ,'- y •-i •, It.x - F`M • SpragueAve ' £ `4 " x V ji, 1- --27 u-rlir 3'. ..sf. ',74 " ,�-•*` -r---7- - -.yam. l .- -ri.:...,_••_,s,'° '.,yam 4 Tom'" ,1,,,,....+- .o •# ., -' x C7w, f _•r+ s -y�^P -;-'7", yr�r _,^"i +ic..• 72_ -_ 'I Vis- t •r r a E 7 t•h►a e " "�{'1t Ave .. '~ � 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project will add over 2 miles of bike lanes to McDonald Road from 16th Avenue north to Mission Avenue.Currently, McDon- ald Road is a 4-lane road section with no parking from Sprague Avenue north to Mission and this road section will be converted to a 3-lane road section with 2 through lanes,a two-way-center-turn-lane,and bike lanes in both directions. From Sprague Avenue south,the existing roadway is a 2 lane roadway with ample width for striped bike lanes in both directions.Three traffic signals will be reconfigured to account for the lane modifications along the corridor and bike lane signing and pavement markings will be in- stalled to give positive guidance to the motorist and the bike lane cyclist. Benefits of Project: The McDonald Rd ROAD DIET project will enhance safety from Sprague to Mission by reducing accidents by at least 20%for all accident types. Providing new marked bike lanes along McDonald will give bicyclists excellent north-south access in the heart of the City and access to the Appleway Trail which provides excellent east-west access to the City's commercial core. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$29,000 Construction (CN)-$545,000 Total Project Cost—$574,000 This project is fully funded using City and HSIP funds. 5. Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk Imp, Mission & Park i - � ,'„1 '. ,, ;° Seth Woodard Elem Sidewalk �;• '• PUksane ' }Ji lin Mission&Park t .. Valley _, , •ark Rd• , ' . --.7- ..! , , , , .,.. ,, . - .07. .,,, i I i . ar' Seth Woodard hy ,,,,i,___ :. „.... _,,,.: --5 —:-- Elementary Schsrv!" I/ ,_ k , ... ■ - x t �� 8. - — — .__ 1--____,‘„, . ifir‘ - ' --` - Mission AY 1 - f .- may_ - Orly ir c ; - -:`� . _ Y� � - - _„ Bowman - �' 1 - i, . North - 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 IProject Description: This project installs new curb and sidewalk along the south side of Mission Avenue from Lily to Park Roads and along the west side of Park Road along the frontage of Seth Woodard Elementary and the E Spokane Grange. New ADA curb ramps at inter- secting streets and along the west side of the Mission and Park intersection. New paving between the existing road and new curb face. Stormwater upgrades to provide adequate drainage features for the road widening. Benefits of Project: ADA accessible sidewalks for children to use when crossing and traversing higher traffic areas with trucks are vital for safety and a positive way to promote healthy walking habits early on. Providing transportation alternatives to residents that either need or choose non-vehicle transportation and developing sidewalks encourages residents to take pride and ownership in their com- munity. This is especially true in low income neighborhoods. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$42,000 Construction (CN)-$319,000 Total Estimated Project Cost -$361,000 This project is fully funded using City and CDBG grant funds. <e\`' 6. Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 'L alley _ ,, tri ✓^fir -- .4:11,-,-- y •,,,.... a .� ^ ppiewayAve 1— , `_ ,. #t. *1± me. - olor -R i +� . ,<:, .r . . il.r" 1 eh ilioriorAr • ,....-' /''''':40.: sir .M � ' j` it 11 "".® �' �u' 1,1.'"'',,u.T('Ll'1,-,► S,a,:. `+I. - Barker Rd ,. Ill . iFti 8 ra . A —....+6A-4.,...,..,0.4 Wit,..r . .mss Sprague/Barker !'1 L. 11a EN ` .,_ ir ntersection Improvements s r Sprague Ave - •� �fi1..R_. 41- - - E+Spiaga'eeA;v ..,.� - e. A- 1 i _ - I: d- 'I L '� North r E- 2016 ] 2017 1 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Barker/Sprague intersection is an unsignalized four-leg intersection. Currently it operates as all-way stop control. Barker Road accesses large tracts of residential zoned parcels and prior to the recession was quickly growing. Now,after several years of slow growth during the sluggish economy the area is beginning to see strong increases in building activity. Traffic analysis indicates that a roundabout or traffic signal will be needed at this intersection in the near future. Once the PE phase begins in 2016,the design of this project will flush out the best solution. Benefits of Project: The Barker/Sprague intersection improvements project will install a traffic control device that will accommodate future growth for many years to come. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$38,000 Right of Way(RW) =$12,000 Construction (CN)=$422,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$472,000 This cost for this project will be a combination of City and Developer funds. 7, 12, 20, 27, 34 & 39 — 2016-2021 Pavement Preservation Projects - !T71751-1 I1 7 W r-1' City of Spokane Valley _ , UUlll Ri " me" ;1 _ g c 2015 Pavement Preservation s 10 �� Bu,llvan-Trent l,R-2g9) PfOjeCt5 ; s annon �a •■!i touyeoesiey eV t L 0artrm �h m ro End "MI Vel lunrve l �y1 Y � � �ddA •J E+%!dA Muir. Misawn-Bowtl.sh ii .1111 Montgomery- to Fines 1111 Eudld Woodruff to �•. _ -^#' _�, � 1 �� 1pt' Dartmouth aill�_ � hbrnim'.- ��RJ 71N 8' ,�,y rddn € Mar Eed tauFlara uliivanti. -:v ��A f,3 n�s.-I � 911+1 w.ne Are -r.. ei I . - d 'IMF '''1.0-. MU'I'M �I Mmkr+" -'• a _ 4iacf Broadway-Sull.ran. E „.......i. .�� 1to Bov ay-IJnrversrtyira .p 'yy�{� 11�� Bowdash .,a:w y E -" it" . 214-107 Meg 1 r ' -- Allini0'w1'7 IV= al ` IMM1111"11111 I I. - ll Um illifira 4 :si Broadway-Herald -■- 1�_.nAffigNZ1 l''''m M ,[ r. .=,...0,,...........to Broadway - wR'� imi:Mk v.• 1 al NM APIREgidr q=m 1 r C. r t_abe-scarg-'e„.,y4 .[,r mai Eth-Barker 4 4tr „n !AM: i [1 [ 1 alleyway. =ammonium a to Hodges r� � JA 1f Are r {r4 [. ■ �, 1 t A. O.ID r,�S,. '' ��r� 1.'.,'f. 1::�=_ A R+'iZ Cf+ � i �*acres th eth...�./ Park-ApplewaypArgonne-Sprague r �,r ro1rd gage-el-1 to IRd+ J ` a to Mh t YWewaY y .:. ��l m„!fl#-69h to Turtle Creek ■ ra2nd-Bcwdish` Ri O '�I Grh-End.f'.naz000-E 6ge,E i Dishrran Mica- to Foes j C 8th to 18th 1•i��i '� ±f14Y.-Mr:oonald _N. r !o EVrgreen i®tls+lerald ,°°Un1� { p`. 302nd;es 2015 Preservation Projects ih 32nd-4ishman-0Aica I }r Overlay Project.A rtErl al_-an DI:-ct• to Boadish l'E , ° Surface Trealn.ent Pmjec3 �r.00.11V 'Dashed lues am Contagency Projects� ng ncg roi ❑isfiman-M�aThoere Date:gn0r2D14 A. to Bowdoh i r2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Beginning with the 2011 budget, the City established Fund 311 —the "Pavement Preservation Fund". This fund set aside money each year to build pavement preservation projects. The fund is broken into these categories: Arterial and Collector Street Overlay Projects—80%of the Pavement Preservation Fund, and Residential/Local Road Overlay and Reconstruction Projects—20%of the Pavement Preservation Fund. Pavement Preservation Projects will be determined for each of the program years using the results of the Pavement Management Analysis Report, site visits, further geotechnical engineering and pavement studies, and citizen complaints. A project list will be developed each year and included in the City's yearly budget. Benefits of Project: Over the last several years,the City,using state and federal grant funds and corresponding City match has invested in several ma- jor street preservation projects. Now,these projects are beginning to deteriorate and show an average Overall Condition Index (OCI) in the mid 70's. Applying surface treatments now to these relatively new pavements will increase the OCI to the low 90's. Surface treatment projects when constructed at the right time are the most cost effective use of City Transportation funds. Project Cost Estimate: These projects are paid for using City Funds established in Fund 311. In the 2016-2021 TIP the Pavement Preservation funds avail- able have been estimated to be$2.2 M per year. 8. Appleway-Park to Dishman Mica Preservation Spokanele y 41 lirli fµ 1 • , i�I. i' • , , x cis•' _ - ' ' ::::: :�Js9I'ti14'1.-11-7'.17v1 � 4. •.9194 "-"' 4 - _ If ; C r• ..'6 Y i l I . p ?N 1 di _ ,. f g, "a- '' .g ,fir:- r--^'1- —11.!.04EirsE i orr116.7r7--1 - 71- — - ':= 4° li onmot_ �R _e l 45185.t 11- b • 4 ' ;.` Sr- FLI - - - ,,,,,Fit.•..t ,,, i _lip , wili I ,: • - - .LL,..___.'---z---, :__,....71- ,., / .. jn, w .R, .1twill,-,. _ __..._ _ _ _. _ ________ _ _... 1- Jig do 1. .- * c il., ., _ t .51,i.c , "' d ' ... ,_ =, w 57 ar8 „t t it 1'M $' ��I ~ 1 ;Hi rl s 4 W 51‘e1 s �.,a.. -.- l��r�92. i ,_. -- Appleway-Parktc yts. ft -'--.. i7. .7 } Dishman Mica Preservation `. 6• I it e. - : II ,— - y m • Ioall e • 1.in t. •t Ems! . 45191 9093 . y, • 3. '.�`t z _ 45192 0066 IONINEK€ ,�. 1 J i. .. w45191 9039 I North , c. 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This pavement preservation project along Appleway from Park to Dishman Mica is a 4-lane principal arterial and is a part of the 1-90 Business Route through Spokane Valley. Appleway is an eastbound one-way road section making up one half of the Sprague/ Appleway Couplet. This project will resurface and strengthen 1 mile of the existing pavement with a new thick asphalt overlay (2.5-3.5 inches). It will remove existing ruts and provide a sealed road surface to re-establish good drainage to the existing gutters. In addition to the road surface,all sidewalks will be field reviewed to verify that they meet current ADA requirements. Sidewalk and sidewalk ramps not meeting these requirements will be upgraded to meet the current standards. The project will also in- clude some stormwater treatment upgrades. Benefits of Project: This project was identified in the City's 2014 Pavement Management Analysis Report as Marginal. Marginal streets that display high amounts of load associated distresses are selected as a priority for rehabilitation as they provide the greatest cost benefit to the City—that is the greatest increase in life per rehabilitation dollar spent. This project benefits the City by using our limited dol- lars with a project that provides the greatest benefit for the least cost. Estimated Project Cost Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$83,000 Construction (CN)=$1,071,000 Total Project Cost—$1,154,000 This project is fully funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. t° '9. ApplewayTrail - Pines to Evergreen Vauey _ � y^ 4 it AP kk r Z 4©, R, J-. t a /" E ehle y?Ati ~ W, i•.. y+ " '� + ti kms} Y 1 e• - ";14, letilk • 3- a aE IL 'IP 0 Y i ti i ".i t y. ' ty - P .-_ 230.i ,' z Z - t R i. -s 0 , ti4 :,"�. a V . t ,�Qapaae -0 . $ - .ii."' ftF4114 fx _ , C_ si. I- P . . SV Pit= 1 �� Oil y F' ,.gum ,fi vTPr.' . •. 'G�3r•`d A c a rrzi OM .• La pplewayTrail Pines to Evergreen - sjl • _-4l hr IlVB` UT t a +North ++, t'. or filter iv i. m - M 1 ;c, p., Q ` irAl M1 -, _ p--? 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail,when complete will be about 6 miles. The City has built about 2.3 miles. This project continues the Trail another mile to the East from Pines to Evergreen. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be landscaped that will include trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting, benches,architectural features and stormwater facilities. Where the trail crosses the highway at Pines, a High intensity Activated crossWalK(HAWK)traffic signal is proposed.The purpose of a HAWK is to stop vehicles to allow pedestrians to cross the roadway and then permit drivers to proceed as soon as the pedes- trians have passed. At Evergreen Road where the Shared Use Path crosses, a Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon (RRFB) is proposed. Including RRFBs on the roadside increases driver yielding behavior significantly. Benefits of Project: The trail accesses services such as banking, postal and government services, the City police department, retail services such as drug stores, supermarkets, office supply stores, and restaurants. In addition,the trail provides access to multifamily housing and single family housing along the corridor. Employees now have a safe choice to walk and bike to access jobs. The Trail provides facilities for healthy lifestyles giving people the opportunity to walk and ride bikes in a safe urban environment. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$146,000 Construction (CN)-$1,885,000 Total Project Cost—$2,031,000 This project is fully funded using City, Federal STP Urban funds, and Federal TAP funds. 10. Fancher/BNSF RR Overpass Joint Repair Project S`gokan�e ``` p p J ,Walley pl -i .----ai-ita.— 0,,, gior, ., r _ lb „_ - - NIA �, Trent Ave(SR-290) ------- ,- ,s ,-rrw, " i+t -,_ `y ., - -- - -._ .+71.11' 29, _ - ili,,_ ww 4 .,M r �i Fancher Rd :, -� C71 ,11 . .t- , _Y Fa n cf�erlBhlSF OP ',.. �. otnt Repair Project - - 1.-a - - __ .-- �— - - - �—- — _ --::—.-- -2 '-',3,-, .44;:411°-__0,--..,.... ,00'RV! ..,..•.. --- .`�- _A"` marcs^:r, - y R-. a $Ii1M - a9nt�kAiy .__ r� 6'1'+f.f � . -- r_ - -, North , _ r t. ri -, lir+ ___ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The Fancher Road Bridge was completed and open to traffic in 1982. The most recent 2012 bridge inspection report indicates that the expansion joints on both ends of the bridge are in poor condition and need to be replaced.The bridge joint membranes are torn and the concrete along the seals is delaminated and spalling. This project will install new bridge expansion joints on both ends of the bridge. Benefits of Project: Because the expansion joints are failing,water and rock is able to get behind the bridge beams and abutment wall where expan- sion and contraction is beginning to cause damage to the structural components of the bridge. Replacing the expansion joints will prevent further damage to the bridge and is the best money the City can spend to protect the taxpayer from having to pay for expensive bridge repairs caused by failing bridge joints. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$29,000 Construction (CN)-$172,000 Total Project Cost—$201,000 ne 11. Mirabeau Pkwy & Pines (SR-27) Traffic Signal Valley f, ; " ` bi icw--- > r fir, i Mirabeau Pkwy&Pines , (SR-27}, Traffic Signal :. _: '-' , M ___ ---— jaittE.3:2 ___________ 4' n ^� r.• wc. � 4 �4- . r. a, ' c ' a_ — . a c ^ e- Northi k , 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The Mirabeau Pkwy& Pines(SR-27)Traffic Signal project installs a new traffic signal at the Mirabeau Pkwy and Pines(SR-27) in- tersection. New commercial development along Mirabeau Pkwy and increased traffic along Pines(SR-27) has made it increasingly difficult to access Mirabeau Pkwy during the morning peak hour and Pines Road during the evening peak hour. Benefits of Project: Installing a new traffic signal at Mirabeau Pkwy& Pines(SR-27)will increase the level-of-service at the intersection from LOS"F" to"LOS" B during the AM & PM Peak Hour. A failing LOS places the burden of mitigating this condition on new development which is oftentimes cost prohibitive. Installing a traffic signal at this location will encourage business to locate and develop along Mirabeau Pkwy, Pinecroft Way,and Cherry Street. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$30,000 Construction (CN)-$320,000 Total Project Cost—$350,000 13. Argonne-Broadway to Indiana Spikane`' 9 Y Ailey �� ndianaAve. 00 , 6. t II { ; f- 1Tk61K . N v `.. 410 `'_ r . _ - - - L. a Argonne-Broadway to Indiana •n `. . " -� a t .y "!" l�t1Allaw : 11fa q , -_ ,e, ,y i F - . ._ i' ■� jr-,......1,` °• i _ t 7 a, w . ,... .2 , lig 1 I I, !, t 4..; 'jit-- t-7 -,-Z.IT" pti"--14- -it r"r- ' , •51§x,.6 ; .- a +., 1 - ;' ita 4`i ' 'I, `- _ lIL .r. ' _ µ +' q1 rvi, _ " A I.•.b C. a .M r s ;4 w z}". . .a. . -;1 ,ii .fir.- ,.i - '1:, DR `o 1 P t 1r1 -`gJ oP j. � off l "' zy #4 L�. ! 1:3- a _ ` _ r' I, rr R'..1 e� • ,: .• a Broadwa Ave. l 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: N Argonne Road from E Broadway to E Indiana Avenues will be a street preservation project that will grind the existing surface to a moderate depth (1.5 to 2.5 inches)and replace with a new hot mix overlay. This project will also evaluate all existing pedestrian facilities and where deficient in terms of ADA will be updated. All broken sidewalks will be replaced or restored. Benefits of Project: This project will apply a new pavement surface extending the life of the road for up to 15 years before retreating. Another bene- fit will be sidewalk restoration and new ADA facilities to provide a safe and barrier free sidewalk along this route. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$64,000 Construction (CN)-$576,000 Total Estimated Project Cost—$640,000 This project is fully funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. 14. Mission & Pines (SR27) Intersection Imp Project �� x Spokane Valley _ -- - - sl. __� _ _ - 1 i 14, , ,,,,......_ Mission &Pines(SR-27) ntersection Im• Pro'ect _ �' , �'" n c •_ r .�,, J - rCl r` !S Kms.d =! — t "S' .i Iri7tr•,..V,—. r.t. _` J 'jai 9 L -4-z r f :. $° Ria , •]_ (1- . •.t.,a Am a -, �_ - - r Mission Ave"�_ .. - _ _ 4, S `�� - ■ _ — — -y ` -! 1: 'T lR-2TI } ziker ,mow-, _ s y � Sii , E,- f . = _ ,. _. 0 ._ - if ►'F �4, ` f -:u `` $ North g A 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project is a restriping and signal modification project for changing the lane configuration of Mission at the intersection of Pines Rd (SR-27). Dedicated left turn lanes will be installed for east and westbound left turn traffic. This change would allow this signal to be run with a duel left turn phase. This would improve the operations of the intersection. Benefits of Project: This project benefits the City by modifying one of the City's busiest intersections for better operations. This improvement results in less vehicle delay and less vehicle emissions. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$35,000 Right of Way(RW)=$50,000 Construction (CN)=$250,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$335,000 15. Opportunity Elementary-SRTS (Bowdish Road) pi31�ai1' .0.Valley � ,ter ' i . 8th Ave w .. #„t = ,f'," - ..i 1 - R - Bowdish Road - ' a ` ' a _ ! _� QPPQRTUNITY � a 111:'---_, ' ELEMENTARY w 11th Ave . i SCHOOL : _ ' r.; 4,_- /Vt ! $ * t a1/ di� .s'- �- 4r , . y 12ths�Ave 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project is a Safe Routes to School(SRTS) project that provides new sidewalks to the Opportunity Elementary School. New sidewalks will be installed along the east side of Bowdish Road beginning at 8th Avenue and ending at 12th.At 11th Avenue, new sidewalks will be installed on the south side of the street from Bowdish Road east to Wilbur Road. The project will include new curbing,a minimum 5'wide sidewalk, new ADA curb ramps at street corners,some roadway paving where new curbs will be be- yond the existing edge of road,some right-of-way acquisition,curb walls and stormwater facilities. Benefits of the Project: New sidewalks provide a safer route to school.Sidewalks build a sense of neighborhood and community and these sidewalks will hopefully reduce the number of cars dropping children off at school during the day. Sidewalks promote safety and encourages children and their parents to walk and be more active. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering =$90,000 Right of Way&Construction=$6,000 Construction=$404,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$500,000 16. Sullivan Euclid Concrete Intersection RW CN P an' �``" Sullivan/Euclid (RW/CN) 4.010 Valley ► L` L'.. d y I Ir Sullivan/Euclid Concrete 4 III ntersection (RWICN) ' y w, - j Project = - i jdAVeJ. ' w — • ¢ a I� ' —71 Vii' + i , C r� f 1 I es ? r p� �7 F 1� • . -4 i — J i r r North 1 `` r` , 2016 2017 I 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project will reconstruct the intersection of Sullivan Rd and Euclid Ave with Portland Cement Concrete and provide ADA up- grades as necessary. Benefits of Project: The existing intersection is experiencing severe rutting,ravelling and longitudinal cracking. Significant truck traffic continues to destroy the pavement. Preservation of the existing pavement is not an option in that the existing pavement section does not have the structural integrity to support the heavy turning trucks. To reconstruct this intersection using PCC Pavement at a de- signed depth to support the type of traffic using it will provide a long term solution to prevent pavement deterioration. This is the most cost effective solution and the least expensive over the long run for the taxpayer. Project Cost Estimate: Right of Way(RW) =$26,000 Construction (CN)=$2,082,000 Total Estimated Construction and Right of Way cost=$2,108,000 17. North Sullivan ITS Project S<pokan' ``► Valley I fr r ; .w _ C"'Il±e1�46'�,.- �f.. ,r,� [.1-1.....,,,,;,.__,../,.� + Z , 1 d i ;S. - ii A ,,,-;,L' .yiEiG'`ti, r-7 .. s _.�, 'leg L i - '- 't"' p'`:r ' 4 "ti-ientwd d/`,-. -- Trent Ave+ i '` �r -a.. i!" , -- _ - — r I- di;. — — e,I s" a �,I -1 '.10. _ -'' 1 =, r '�„a•► -+ % -.- . L 1 p — • f_. , .;�.A i North Sullivan l ' I� ;," .- _ r �: :, p,., 1"- '' TS Project .t 14:t , r _ ', P " ' —. .'.-. —I- . _ _ r • y#4' .. �" i North Sullivan Road ' ~` 7 ' A'` , __ _ +Ind i�'ar F'{_T j . -n r w _�.ri .a ' P:" ;.A..T. :.. 1116 AO .. ir ,y,�'}► f- ', r _ K-,..." �f l .�- /' P. ..•'. Vie, '.. ".r t3Ii§gdbA4 13- l i . fi i'4a y r s i -� g Mil 1 ii jy��y� �s 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Sullivan is a principal arterial and this section carries a high volume of freight. The project is located within the particulate matter and carbon monoxide maintenance areas.The project includes the installation of conduit and extension of the fiber optic lines for the continuation of the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS)along Sullivan Road from 1-90 to Trent Ave (SR-290). This would connect the traffic signal controllers at Central Pre-Mix, Marietta, Euclid, Kiernan and Trent Ave to the Spokane Regional Traffic Management Center via existing fiber optic lines at Indiana. It would also install cameras at three locations. Benefits of Project: The Project adds efficiency to traffic operations along the Sullivan corridor north of the interstate resulting in lower vehicle emis- sions and travel time. Traffic signals will be interconnected and can be remotely operated to address emergency traffic needs. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$105,000 Construction (CN)=$809,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$914,000 18. Sullivan Rd - Trent (SR-290) to Wellesley Corridor Lighting 11.4111#11\11.111,ft ,: - - - Wellesley Ave =o ,,,. ' .. �+ ., f]U ►ane + `.`•_ _ -+ a , O i+- - t �_ Lilley 6 -0 'R s,I. Fi za `A ,t Y 91 _ 110 _V _ „°� p ► - - • .Af--, .a V.. - — i Trent(SR-290)to Wellesley „ .a., "ta' "' yw�a i R Corridor Lightingc ' , 4 + •. -t'r, ti. Or +� r j c 2„ !fi ` ati: ,-- it k. r - . ,,,„... . . __, , 0. 101 ' 1 y • .....-"'"- _ "oar. ,290s Trent(SR-290) -_- - _ -,..- INTag - - iirliliar" -- '' -, a ,_ North 2016 2017 I 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project installs street lights between Trent Ave (SR-290)to Wellesley Avenue. This project was identified in the recently com- pleted North Sullivan Corridor Study that saw increased night time crashes through this section of Sullivan Road. Street lights have been shown to reduce nighttime crashes anywhere from 12-30%. Benefits of Project: By adding streetlights,this project will reduce the number of nighttime crashes along Sullivan Road between Trent and Wellesley Avenue. Also,as an added benefit,street lighting has been shown to reduce crime rates. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$90,000 Right of Way(RW=$50,000 Construction (CN)=$600,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$740,000 19. Sullivan-Wellesley Intersection Improvement Project _ 1 - _ . `. NE m EHGELomr GULCH _ _ k NOR RCe.AE3 EXT ElV SIQN `nokane i' a -. Valle 4' ) SULLIYAN vvp_LLESLEY Mu e INTERSECTION IMPROVEM ENT,PROJECT i - � we r ._ M1labaS,, -;ads Ra�xa - r. - - r Ste. 4; f r .A. ;.- F mss. �s TWE },,, '� V I. iF :� �'—F Her o�-,4ve 9 -..1 wry i ■ .- y. . -i r}r.-. • cod 7 - _ _.._ —, _ 1 , L _ - Q _,",t iii_ -.,.., , ,-r;''', . ,, r , 144 ,, . - _ - .. , ndu to-ia- .,,—.1„_.„,h _ inti SPOSsAIN:E VALLEY111 ,C _. 1 w NI?USTR AL PALM' '- lib • moi . � 2016 l 2017 2018 L 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: A traffic signal or a multilane roundabout is needed at the intersection in order to provide safe and efficient traffic movement. Currently,during certain times of the day, traffic volumes at the Sullivan-Wellesley intersection exceed the capacity of the all-way stop-controlled intersection. Spokane County is moving forward with its Bigelow Gulch Road project which is scheduled to con- nect to Wellesley at Sullivan in 2019. When that occurs,the Sullivan Road intersection will not be able to accommodate the add- ed traffic and motorists will experience excessive delay and congestion. Benefits of the Project: 1) Reduces delay and efficiently moves traffic along the Sullivan&Wellesley corridors 2) Reduces serious, high speed crashes 3) Allows for the added traffic volumes expected with the future connection of Bigelow Gulch Road Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering=$198,000 Right of Way= $110,000 Construction=$1,062,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$1,370,000 21. Appleway Trail - Evergreen to Sullivan S�pokannee ``�` pp Y 9 Valley cii,t ;... .--..i.„--. ,,, ., • .,- -? --:".; -.- i-4; -..-., '-.., , : —re, , lifilp." - - !.- :171:' • •:2--:.• ,‘,. • • ,1-,',.;41",L"' •.� E air)A'e'.. olgr J1 +C17.0 S r +" { t�Ei Mr* ! II f ,i.' : °- ' 'I` ' "' •;, •,"11::-r.y 1 111 n. �.''-� A lewa Trail rp � r pp yA .`` 4� l,_arl �'i irk. "; Sprague . 4 .. Nif , '"•�gt. ig' Evergreen to Sullivan ' 1'r ` a • '? a i, y tiFR us, tti , ',. 1 IL �I r Irl �•yf Ili/ r ..r • r` 1'711.2'or-cm,1 tl, OD o, r - — . �I! ., .. �� 1 s ', 411 tr 1 L's�Pi•' ," 4E Sfh ir/f-Eve reen _ r. 1 i,. ^. j �:1 y i Ih a E y+ri!.� ,+ _ f, r '. NW,I �� J i 1{� 1*+i i , 4.•3I' e r .. ,� •• ,yl. r°(, J _ „ :ate `�•E�6tr v ,s• � 'E�Btt11- it r' I *lb r. SSSS I i r • ;;.±L-,,,.! es. 4 ,., i , L u`o Y 1 'Fi. .,1'w i y...�r. Z. F, ^ ams yr �l\.... • .4i $ _ ` r._± f r . V'h r •f 'j P1 ,• a • i • ....ir *, ," "` k- -s +.lx--'E 9 Ot�Y,-Ave- , z` 3 jam► •r�`" •e Central Valle HS is- 1..4.)CYLri V7 r ,. .1 6, 422lh 1 e• a�t' kr ;. t, r.1'. R7}4' .•� 1111 ►roL j4g oi ►■�/,/� • ., +( " a e-"1r.. 1Y , 1'LIV/i Aron I� 41=•� -." 11Vrth c _.. 91 .it-z ia.' fb: i :. dam' . t,I I,;tr�, *" 41..,''$.14 .113- tzpV1 w E 4 s elick L r r f A1' r.., ,r_ _8,-;' e -i- ,--- '''kis.:�' +a ,w 2016 2017 2018 1 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail,when complete will be 6.2 miles. Of that the City has built or funded about 3.3 miles. This project continues the Trail another mile to the East from Evergreen to Sullivan Road. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be land- scaped that will include trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting, benches, architectural features and storm- water facilities. Benefits of Project: The trail accesses services such as health care, banking, postal and government services, retail services such as drug stores,super- markets,office supply stores,and restaurants. In addition,the trail provides access to multifamily housing and single family hous- ing along the corridor. Employers such as the Numerica Corporate Offices, Monaco Enterprises, H & H Molds, and various retail services will allow walkers and bikers to access jobs. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$164,500 Construction (CN)-$1,480,500 Total Estimated Project Cost=$1,645,000 22. Appleway Trail - University to Balfour Park ,�,polana e Valley .-. ,„ �f orn5 ¶ River sid r`A a -ossi!]ie site m I r ow- pokane al' '-11 MIMII Y ranch Library 1 i ;- i I 3 t., - .rc '} ut _ oi[aFl ` rf�- ;:. 1 i. Fe Uni s.ty an - 7 — 'Talley' •. I :I___ I Ill " . New Appieway i Dartmouth Trail - ji .! N , ...„, ..... , . _ . . • •.,, :_ __ . ., A.. plewa Blvd ST '-, k 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail,when complete will be about 6 miles. By 2019,The City has built about 3.3 miles. This project continues the Trail another 1/2 mile from Balfour Park to University Road. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be landscaped that will include trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting,benches,architectural features and stormwater facilities. The Appleway Trail from University to Balfour Park connects the University City Mall, Balfour Park,and the City's future City Hall to the Appleway Trailhead at University. In addition, if the voters pass a Spokane Library District bond,the County plans to build a 30,000 square foot Spokane Valley branch across from the University City Mall on the north side of Sprague fronting Harold. Benefits of the Project: This project is probably one of the most important components of the entire Appleway Trail project in that it connects walkers and bikers to shopping,a park, municipal government,and possibly a County/City library. Also,this portion of the trail would con- nect people to the Spokane Transit Authority's Transit Center,giving people the option to use the bus to work,shop, play,and conduct their business here in Spokane Valley. The Trail provides facilities for healthy lifestyles giving people the opportunity to walk and ride bikes in a safe urban environment. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)and Right of Way(RW)-$230,000 Construction (CN)-$520,000 Total Estimated Project Cost—$750,000 23. Argonne Road Concrete Pavement- I-90 to Montgomery . •.. gp6,h4`milis4 :ILz__ - [SS`I' Valleyh�PontgomeryAve ��>> i , -... _74' ,..1,,:%-_, . ',. ........r_-i•i lasia ./g."1 lit Nip #- :l g „wefV' �.. a , _ lir an . f-.- _ to ,.; . !t .: ..f�® I II :�+-.. J�,' , ■ tr, r. E �w ,1 rgonne Rd Concrete Pavement ,--- - `fie. *A`-�. 9L�to Mont.vme a . �_ t,...- . ., . . ‘ , H ¢ 4 111 .7-1_- `g - .., T r...4. ..-.....y., ,r,....kms $ --- i _ 9 0 ` te .0. •• - 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Argonne Road from Indiana to Montgomery Avenues is about a 1/4 mile (1400'),7-lane asphalt concrete pavement that has ade- quate capacity for the traffic that is there today and expected traffic that will use the facility over the next 20 years. But the road is quickly failing and has gone past the point where pavement preservation is an option. A full reconstruction is required. This application seeks funding to fully reconstruct this roadway by rebuilding the base and constructing a thick structural portland cement concrete pavement surface. In addition,all pedestrian sidewalks and wheelchair ramps will be upgraded to meet ADA requirements. Benefits of Project: The City of Spokane Valley's Pavement Management Analysis Report(PMAR)allows staff to be good stewards by providing up-to- date roadway condition information when selecting projects. The PMAR has identified Argonne Road to be reconstructed through this section. With the high amount of traffic on this street and the high maintenance dollars being spent to maintain this roadway it makes sense to invest in reconstructing this roadway using concrete rather than continuing to spend scarce resources trying to preserve it. Paving this street with concrete will provide a 30 year design life. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$512,000 Construction(CN) =$3,211,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$3,723,000 24. Citywide Sidewalk Infill Project�� m-��U� ~~�~"^~ � � �/ �°^", ��m0mley � . -. 1 111 & � m � ' } -- ` �� 7,'" � Y ~' ` � » / ,.. . gall ,A. il . miliiiim AL LEYWAY AV '. lin . - 11 winaltiamulgiet ; -Eli - li .7 1 ' rniAir g . .,,, -4._ f,.,„ JR,: pg. :__!-. , i ;A ,si ' I 1 - , li ,. ,. .. .4J. ,.. =mum! ... - AMEX min in= A'=A- _ : 1.,,,I I - : .. IL ri:k - " rilM UM 1M a'' I _ i 1 li t''si,'gaf -- -Proposed Sidewalks r' . it. School Sdewalks -Driveway Crossing ... -Existing Shared Use Path 4....._ .. .,..,„ rs„),,, al Trailhead Proposed Shared Use Pa. -Pedake Bridge Proposed Pedake Bridge 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 _.• Project Description: This project will continue the City's effort to fill in sidewalk gaps and improve transit access at selected locations throughout the City.The project segments will focus on improvements within the walking radius of schools, high density housing,commercial districts and transit facilities. Benefits of Project: Thepnojectmmu|denhancenon'motorizedtransportationwiththegoa|ofincnasingtransitridenhip,wa|kingandbikingthps, and reducing the need to drive. It will improve the accessibility of several corridors and public facilities. Thepnojectexpandsthechoicesfornon'motorizedtrave| betweenschoo|s, mcmation,commercia|disthctsandnsidentia|aneas. This is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan to develop a balanced, integrated,multi-modal transportation system, which serves the existing and future needs of the area and provides convenient choice among modes for trips into and out of Spokane Valley:for work,school,shopping, personal business,and recreational purposes. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$140,000 Right of Way(RW) =$30,000 Construction (CN)=$830,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$1,000,000 25. Evergreen Resurfacing- Mission Connector to Indiana m 11116.4. ,1 - I� Y R _ 'r+w 1 +:Vis, Y, (11 Y'[Y' s�y� . --z _ _ . c �� Valley Evergreen Resurfacing- YThi - _ - - _ _ Mission Connector to Indiana, r�` , Y'F s_' ' j'y'�7. or. *N .Y Y_ &.,, _ \ X11_ _` _ - " c a . Mission Ave . s . r `ter - - �.. t,'E. 40... , z: is r ar aIn --- E 5't ; t `_- _ -ter.. rr -: T._ fes' II I -i .__ _f,� - - -4"Jim ` - - J __ - . .- a1- y sifra _ 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This preservation project will resurface and strengthen the existing pavement by grinding the existing surface down below the existing ruts and cracks and apply new asphalt overlay to the surface. This project provides a sealed road surface and reestablish- es roadway slopes for good drainage. This project will improve bicycle facilities on Evergreen Road over 1-90. There are bike lanes through this section of Evergreen Road but the bike lanes start and stop at the various ramp terminals and turning pockets. One of the desires for this project is to provide positive guidance for bicyclists both from the standpoint of the bike user for better wayfaring and to make it clear to the motorists to expect bicyclists and to give them the right-of-way required to negotiate such a high-speed, large roadway. Benefits of Project: This project was identified in the City's 2014 Pavement Management Analysis Report as needing a thin to moderate overlay. Streets requiring minimal treatment at the right time are selected as a priority for preservation for they provide the greatest cost benefit to the City—that is the greatest increase in life per rehabilitation dollar spent. This project benefits the City by using our limited dollars to preserve a key roadway that provides the greatest benefit for the least cost. Updating Bike Facilities over the Evergreen IC will provide positive guidance over 1-90. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$80,000 Construction (CN)=$580,000 Total Project Cost—$660,000 This project is fully funded using City and Federal STP Urban funds. 26. Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin Preservation Spokane ' Valley wilfitrieli 162,1s2 -fivinem.,,_ , p ,., . - .- ' - _ -t--- -, 'It''—'7-7. -.17,7.-or— rt� .t tom^ ' +� 11 t I ' .f . '`A 3 * r. x k. `•, a x t i lew ti° ` __iyy{ �` r w _, ..r •.x i •i+ {t.' A .r Ery ll ]N+ayP. .w� ` � ' n. a;' r "a GP . ► . S'• F ` '"a 1�' 1a So - Vt. r+ ,..11.$1.:. � 4+ y- 4 .e:1...--x-3.---,:1l~? �+L:: • ST L` J r " ce 1 191 + et '. Q ir 4 T.'� X . .3 .. I- 41- rim mn .. ..'.0..'1-: j Jam-ria • z _ J '.+.. r j i.® . Sprague • n - - r A -„,... :r, ',' �- 1 ..il --.1.‘,.'"sem t 4 .V_erajdale 4 II 11I�(f L r .� ,.� ,. x mob.: � . -'�.• _L f � "�... ,.rir r^ *gy*'° r�r *, s�yC" "�.-. _ r SI,rt_ -Sprague-Sullivan to Corbin .,- , .''" +�=' `( ' - ' _ ,e { ': _ 'RPreservation Project ` •— �� , r� , 1 - 1.1EWI'' viIrmailk1kk ` ir �. ► SpauyfK - , :' -1" N .�r.1e4iai'A1 7 ti rrti 1: If; , �'i, F 'scr i - r!'_ • 1 _ rn•.wF_0409 ^'+`e is E 5 h AV e r rf e i fr_-`* •'' fYo ,T7•"r , r .' • i -r E Fi11'`D� + .f. � She: Lake _ . 0• • `..'jha. _ a s Z71 T 11.4 ' 41; . lig'`).A .-.48r-"' - t om` ur _ m B1tk•n _ tai.« , � - -, _; , , . North 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Sprague Road between Sullivan and Corbin was identified in the City's Pavement Preservation Analysis Report as a candidate as a preservation project that would grind and overlay up to 3 inches of hot mix asphalt. Doing this project in 2019 will extend the life and serviceability of Sprague Road and make it a good candidate for a perpetual pavement. This project will also evaluate side- walk,sidewalk corner ramps,and stormwater facilities and make upgrades and replacements as required. Benefits of Project: Sprague Road is the 1-90 Business Route through the City and provides access to services, commercial retail and office space, and access to high, medium,and low density residential development.Sprague allows good east and west movement of people and goods and is a vital link in providing economic vitality along one of the City's major arterials. Bus Service runs in both directions at a frequency of 15 minutes during most of the day and evening. This project is a good use of the City's money in that it provides an extended service life to a very important piece of the City's transportation infrastructure. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$177,000 Construction (CN)=$1,593,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$1,770,000 This project is fully funded using a combination of City and Federal STP(U)funds. 28. Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan Concrete Intersection (CN only) ti s 2 # r i . .- A 1 _W . okaHe - r -4-7,-, ,T-- _. ., Valls jr.....--rte_. .17" ,�,• _-_T .L 4 [. ` = .r _ 4 r ID M. _ ------- �,�;- '--8 1 's - j-^ ° Ii, ISI r. . ;r- k• r -„�, r, _,,,e n_-- ---...- -. - -- — :roadwa Ave — i,i in— —.— = - _ _1/i/71il11? 1 • I y kik— t!1!11.'!111 I `� tIIlk 5 , `may nt, •,, .._ I _ y " •i = Mr—-% . rf ro _ ' r C a 'I - i -, , 'I - _ _.- _ __ - Q- ' North 1 1 �i 2016 2017 I 2018 2019 I 2020 , 2021 Project Description: This project will reconstruct the intersections of Broadway Avenue at Argonne and Mullan Roads with PCC pavement and provide ADA upgrades as necessary. Benefits of Project: The existing intersection is experiencing severe rutting,raveling and longitudinal cracking. Significant truck traffic continues to destroy the pavement. Preservation of the existing pavement is not an option in that the existing pavement section does not have the structural integrity to support the heavy turning trucks. To reconstruct this intersection using PCC Pavement at a de- signed depth to support the type of traffic using it will provide a long term solution to prevent further pavement deterioration. This is the most cost effective solution and the least expensive for the taxpayer.The design life of the project is 30 years. Project Cost Estimate: Construction (CN)=$1,703,000 29. Broadway Improvement Project-Flora to Barker ®r `TT'` kerne s P_ Valley w • w i s:ry i_ _ __ — _; — . r ' . 4�Creeracres ik A......._____.._...„..."<....__ ___.___ c1®H .` I - ,,,,,—Broadway Improvement - 7J-- Flom Rd _ ,. _ Project-Flora to Barker 4 ;f;- ! Yom,_. R .' i• : r _� ,. Y _lµ. Y _"'T- i.. - -., - f BroadwayAve . +. m _ - 1 _ st, .y. F M',S r T vw' �.... IV, . It ry if •ffi s — 111r r Barker Rd .' D 1 , 1 — I ..' '" '- 4 1 " ' tw + pN� 4 rig, w,a n�tve �. ,Jti �;, LL. , , 's,*, r �. ay pue r MI z.' j `Il4i •,.. 4 . a p elo9 @°ilea. ` 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The Broadway Improvement Project between Flora and Barker Road will connect Broadway between Long and Greenacres Roads and improve Broadway Avenue to a 3-lane urban section with bike lanes, curb,gutter,sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: The project will provide access to large vacant parcels that have limited access because the current Broadway Avenue does not go through to Flora or Barker. Also,this project will allow those traveling east on Broadway to Barker and the interstate unre- stricted travel east of the Flora and Broadway roundabout. Now eastbound drivers on Broadway must go out of direction in order to get to their destinations. This project will give drivers, bikers and walkers direct access to Barker Road. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$543,000 Right of Way(RW) =$500,000 Construction (CN)=$4,163,000 Total Estimate Project Cost=$5,206,000 30. Evergreen & Broadway ITS Sli;oln'�e Valley . . r t n - rrnF _ ' r FS�oktPaley - - . -Jib _ r _ ' -- .- - Broadway R c . G 'Ines(SR-27) ° - - s .. _ -. s e 4 vergreen &Broadway ITS° _ +Ifs 04.1 in . b la ,0--1-..., ,r•*!LTJ L1 -.5p'ra�!,--.....y.‘-1.,,_:„ m, .0- p� - e n� 6 \.-- ' ,O ! C jAil ire a a ^-3.d`f'Lve_ - ..-.�s fi r] f3 - - ..- - . "yam - c ' ; [t. five _ _ r. - �}.1 ' qt + - • r':' � 6tn J1:Jr _ _ r 7. • •' "9F Ave .-y • - ❑ ' E �bt,ti ave vergreen �, a _ Opportunityr, _ r i7f 4 _ I a_ Note: Blue Line indicates the extent of sl - `' Communication and Traffic Signal Corridor that will a cn Ln c _ _ _ be completed with this project. ' . 00. I ,,, ib► `° North it 1..- ..., .VF '16th Ave ° ' " gra E 16tf7iVe 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This Project proposes to install ITS conduit and communication equipment to improve traffic flow,reduce congestion,and re- duced emissions on Evergreen from Sprague to 16th Avenue and along Broadway from Pines Road (SR-27)to Evergreen Road. Benefits of the Project: The Project will reduce travel time and stops along Evergreen and Broadway. In addition,the Project reduces emissions along corridors keeping the air clean in Spokane Valley. The Project increases economic development by reducing delays to freight trav- el, reduces fuel and maintenance costs for freight carriers and the public, reduces the operational cost for traffic signal manage- ment,and improves the monitoring of the traffic signal system to enhance efficiency(emergency situations and operations). Project Cost Estimate Preliminary Engineering=$206,000 Right of Way&Construction=$1,664,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$1,870,000 32. Park Rd #2—Broadway to Indiana (RW/CN) S"Thane ....., Valley ;t ev T r►,- =-1r— 1-- ■,-s- i'f c}_i. r , s • -i. i. —. 4 v r , lai Park Rd#2-Broadway ,• _-..- r � M .,, .�. _to Indiana (RWICN) . -,�---!:Yr.' a r { _.—__—%, ,ws e M3 �1 r •r r "x . - ; . • Www _ ~ - +. ` -°-:1F ,9 � y - .-� IL 'S s.�- - -"-' x t r t fi—'f'". 4;721 ,. N*,, . paw-r - ' r ,.,:-,....,-:-:,";•-:.;—' _. .1-:-.-.''-'7- '57;-,.0•'--'.."' _- � ..� 4 _ •� .,+ _ yam. ,-7 !A yam- - ion 4, F- .t .,r /y�,;. ...y irk .. � _ g .,0 . W A a. e : BroadwayAve ' — rUOp 1., Ili , . I.: .1. -_ c..............),„, * _ 4. North fl3.-i TT - •- • •—'7'r.,4.; 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: This project will reconstruct the existing minor arterial to a three lane urban section. Curb,gutter,sidewalks and bike lanes will also be constructed. It will feature two 12 foot wide travel lanes and 5 foot bike lanes, a 14 foot,two-way, left turn lane,curbs, gutters and 6 foot sidewalks. Benefits of Project: The project will provide needed safety and capacity improvements to accommodate the anticipated increase in traffic between Trent (SR-290) and Broadway Ave. The traffic volume on this section of Park Road is anticipated to increase from the existing 7,200 vehicles per day to approximately 21,000 vehicles per day in 2040 according to the most recent SRTC regional traffic model. Also, Park Road is an 1-90 crossing that has adequate width to meet bike and pedestrian standards. As the bike system develops in the City,the Park Road interstate crossing and eventual Bridging the Valley BNSF Railroad and Trent Ave (SR-290)crossing,will make Park Road a more attractive bike way. Park Road bike lanes will access the Millwood Trail to the north and Sprague and Appleway on the south. Project Cost Estimate: Right of Way(RW) =$150,000 Construction (CN)=$2,877,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$3,027,000 33. Pines (SR-27)/BNSF Underpass, PE ONLY p , .... F 4). ie �. rte• .�. i.. Y 4M .I [, �� y9 s 5.1.1�f'•.['94� 4' X1.,1 .- i "f rpt. ' .i ;, r r e•° e� �� rib..- .,/iti . IW. 0.1' ' ,; , r .,mss` ' - I 1 '-Th—....--- - - .r,w mow.�. y ••-'_'ia .rte y _ _: -. '� ,_ .._•Wti self,- �i1- .x: _ TT , ;',1' ` �—�+ — 4+� '. -41,` �T � j „ti L IDS, .l 1 A , ITA w , �-} - k ''171)0,10 . .` 1-"- _;° "� ;AL1 Oj.. l U - 6 n ° ry � c I e Ire 'v ,y I$1I t 1 - ,.,, ..- .....„, . e,,evi-;,,. . , ',yapfl 1211 - ..` �',, j t � II ,�"� kms° c{+LIQ``�Jd:-J . - , fii 2016 2017 2018 2019. 2020 2021 Project Description: This project proposes to reconstruct Pines Road to pass under four BNSF tracks.To accommodate this Trent Avenue will also be lowered,similar to the Argonne Road underpass.This project will allow the City of Spokane Valley to request closure of the Uni- versity Road railroad crossing one mile to the west,which would further improve public safety by reducing the possibility of rail/ vehicle collisions at this intersection. This project is critical because of the projected increase in vehicular traffic in the area through 2040 and because of it's location, which is approximately half way between the two nearest crossings of the BNSF track(Argonne Rd to the West and Sullivan Rd to the East).The separation of Pines Road and the BNSF tracks will provide a vital transportation link to the businesses and residenc- es north of Trent (SR-290),south along Pines(SR-27), I-90 and further south to the Palouse. Benefits of the Project: This project eliminates rail crossing crashes at both the Pines(SR-27)and University BNSF crossing. Crossing delay is eliminated along Pines Road and along Trent(SR-290)when accessing Pines(SR-27). Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering=$2,000,000 Right of Way&Construction=$25,000,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$27,000,000 35. Appleway Trail-Sullivan to Corbin SI okan'�e ' p p Y Valley - . - EArrt�grel�4,v r,� _ ,wd .� - E •a a da Wats • i^• 'raj �:" ,.A.k .Ave - _ t. F zKf. �.. �• M t . r• ,awA _,is , . 11 r�•1 i ; e'' , e P �f3 ' { } Y. I. } J,i �I® ! - its` • G ism I ' .. r 1 x .. i . o;i !� I Pi,. - r„ 4 t i Fac' a ?. �' - "_. �- I. • 2,4 to,. r .0 4.-th '. .i�''. i - i.,yl ,""t+ a r�l-ice tE ,e' n r -r.-`,..r t' -a.,�. ' 1{eyway?{4ve - ,r i r1,- - ;y y 1 11 �;, •R - vu}a�rr,tae;-- t'.. . Y ♦ ,- l��.r4'n. 9 04 d oo al" ` E F�ive;r 1,4. ae' '6 ' •44 5 .+ K.) '- - 11 rte' I 'I' J R �. L ��a ..• ''3..r4 -'t,' , _ o lir V. ' r -� % - '� -`-- gt 1,? ..,_,_,_. 7 a - 190 aTatl a Ave : r , Verad`ifll 4 #If'i; -� r I �- � t „1r11 v.- ^� ii i. V� s 1•r, pp or r ,ppleway Trail-Sullivan to Corbin F ` 1 ', 1 d,- ., .f ter, r`iim --_ .—fyf� +F FRdrif it i � ®� 6i4 r 4 l ,if n- - . a • a i - ri 'i-11t3. �M -.`'�v< - �- ■■ -� vii - - r'r. li 0.4 o a '.!j l� /� 7y '4 Wit,41 ��I. ,r J , y.'iyt.L tt f pard-L- � - +_ 0. w'_ -' {R;' i7 11!a• SFr-uc•4 .� t- `�":!t ,aF 9v .N1.,11'• :i 1 0.;'ka�v'.r,. ll oh • f ._ as U' _ ' i�t- /'��"•17 rp- _ • ;i as ` - '} •�ti y� �• ♦'- ,`{ ■ ;-� wi.'L # L1 j Ti o 6f! -k ., I 1 t ,{.Er5t L�ti.yr .1..-2-'`t7 51r Rv ! 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The City's goal is to complete the Appleway Trail across the City from Balfour Park east to Liberty Lake. The length of Trail,when complete will be about 6 miles. In 2020,the City will have built about 4.7 miles. This project will build 1.3 miles from Sullivan to Corbin Rd completing the Appleway Trail. The Trail will be a 12' hot mix asphalt path. The Appleway Trail project will be land- scaped that will include trees and an irrigation system. The trail will include lighting,benches,architectural features and storm- water facilities. Where the trail crosses Sullivan,a High intensity Activated crossWalK(HAWK)traffic signal is proposed.The purpose of a HAWK is to stop vehicles to allow pedestrians to cross the roadway and then permit drivers to proceed as soon as the pedestrians have passed. Benefits of Project: The Appleway Trail accesses services such as banking, postal and government services, retail services such as drug stores, super- markets, office supply stores,and restaurants. In addition,the trail provides access to multifamily housing and single family hous- ing along the corridor. Employees now have a safe choice to walk and bike to access jobs. The Trail provides facilities for healthy lifestyles giving people the opportunity to walk and ride bikes in a safe urban environment. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$200,000 Construction (CN)=$2,200,000 Total Project Cost—$2,400,000 SI I ka 36. Barker Road- Euclid to Flora Road Walley om >•k Trent Ave-SR-290 r4-, nom, i Barker Rd -Euclid to 0.1 mr a' S of Trent Ave(SR-290) it nir -et 2 ' 'R. I. 1.1 , y- r . . - ge. • . - iattar-ner.n llGlfd - .._ I. lgo - ,...,-.10 '' C- Glace Ave r r 4 . ti.. . x .-f..r: ��'� [ p- de �� ass kil L� �� I ssl. t ,.. ;r< _ rr 1.1 'k�1f'r40 r.r. r r North - r I it t-A;_.�~fir.!1 a •`. :'.Ir 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Barker Road from the Spokane River to Euclid intersection will be widened to a 5-lane roadway with 2 lanes in each direction and a middle turn lane,and will include bike lanes,sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: Barker Road accesses the heart of the city's industrial area and traffic is expected to grow by 38%by year 2040. Widening the road anticipates future growth and will be in place as the industrial land is developed. New bike lanes and sidewalks will extend access to Trent Ave(SR-290) and neighborhoods on the north side of the highway and east to Otis Orchards along Wellesley Avenue. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$471,000 Right of Way(RW) =$100,000 Construction (CN)=$3,613,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$4,184,000 37. Barker Rd Improvement Project-Appleway to I-90 lh ¢� _— - � _: - - Valley k 8raadwa Avenue 41-' -- — - r = i . 111111 . +� Barker Rd Imp Project-Appleway to 1-90 "s _ r • pg , ti . (rill a ] .7.7. 1„,, i sir It , ,r rf`- r ., ffrif i it {I.. " lr i �� (i 11 F o f V s N R r r .�; iL - r 4 ir r iki i i ii! a .,i 1 aE-eDwleya ye, _ - I 4 p r y r 1,1 ar. x r , , ire y o- ne,Cir� ' ..i leT ' R s P- ` pL0 .,+.. res ,w we ,i _0,..G + A ) i. 1, 4,0 e ,F :dry i 9 .� : • EAS1 Br 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: Barker Road will be widened to a 5-lane urban section from Appleway to the Barker Road 1-90 interchange (IC). The east leg of Broadway Avenue will be realigned to match Broadway on the west side of Barker Road. The new intersec- tion will either be a 2-lane roundabout or traffic signal. Barker Road will include new bike lanes, sidewalks, and swales. Benefits of the Project: Barker Road between Appleway and the Barker Road 1-90 (IC) is an important arterial link. Appleway is the east end of the 1-90 Business Loop and accesses the heart of the commercial district in the City of Spokane Valley. New side- walks and bike lanes will connect to the Appleway Trail on the south and provide a link over 1-90 to the Centennial Trail along the Spokane River. This area is ripe for development and redevelopment and this upgrade will provide good transportation facilities to facilitate that growth. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering (PE) =$382,000 Right of Way(RW)=$1,146,000 Construction (CN) =$2,397,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$3,629,000 38. Barker Rd Improvements-South City Limits to Appleway .y. --•- el, •e , lG . ppleway 1 ��" ti (it11N' 90 .'f_-' Valley - _ - AI - - - �1 P e , Sprague � : - - •Ili- �� - - - . /: F w r..0 ,. Oa Barker Rd Imp,S City • _ - Limits to App!eway --=},i + _ - r�.s• _ - - �..0 .'+ 4 • _s ,r -�-2yF:r i,.�.a '— ( - r � 4 ,_ . ` ` a . t - t,7.-fl V2 ± Jr. # Y + .r 'r' +'. r r i. ..'..=, • r a� . — r L," teLhi : Jt • 9;trlF e •• _ *4 Y t.. e.y. _ . = is .-..- -� t r; lh-L-r or �l 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The Barker Road Improvement project from the South City Limit to Appleway is about 0.80 miles long and will be widened to a 3- lane urban section that will include bike lanes,curbs,sidewalks,and swales. Barker Road traffic is steadily increasing due to significant housing development in both the City and the County. The existing road was constructed when this section of the City was primarily rural and Barker Road was a farm to market road. In most places the road is one lane in each direction, narrow,with gravel shoulders. The drainage facilities are at a minimum with few swales. Crash rates are slowly increasing and as the area becomes more developed,crashes are expected to increase. Benefits of Project: This project will upgrade the existing road to urban standards. A new center turn lane will provide left turn refuge out of the mainline traffic. New bike and pedestrian facilities will be installed to give residences more options in transportation. Rebuilding and widening the road is expected to reduce crash rates. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$326,000 Right of Way(RW) =$25,000 Construction (CN)=$2,502,000 Total Estimated Project Cost=$2,853,000 40. Argonne Rd & I-90 IC Bridge Widening n '' , , Valley - , r ' frp 1-1 1••....I, 1 I T ill C> { I a I' I I - . _„„,. 1 '11. 1 I ..... 1 ,,,„ _.: WIDEN BRIDGE TO 3-LANES, il \-9121 I . ARGONNE 4 WSDOT EXIT NIJNABER 287 s I 1 I - u'' 11 I 71 i SIDE r - 1----r--- ti I 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 I 2021 Project Description: Argonne Road north and south of the interchange is three lanes, except over the interstate,where Argonne Road travels over a 2- lane bridge. This creates a bottleneck and significantly adds delay and congestion in the peak travel hours. The City recently completed the University Overpass Report that recommends adding a third lane and a sidewalk to the bridge. According to the report,adding an additional lane would significantly reduce delay through the 2040 design year. This project will add another 12 foot travel lane,a 6 foot wide shoulder and a 10 foot sidewalk to the Argonne Road bridge over I- 90. Benefits of Project: The project relieves corridor congestion and significantly reduces travel time. By 2040, according to traffic modeling, if no lane were added, the time to drive from Trent to Mission would take about 7 minutes. The same drive by adding another lane to the bridge would be under 2 minutes. The project supports future plans for STA's "Fly-over" Stop at Argonne Interchange when they implement the High Performance Transit Network(HPTN). Widening the bridge and adding a new 10 foot sidewalk and widened shoulder provides improved pedestrian facilities per the City's Comprehensive Plan. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)-$800,000 Construction (CN)-$7,200,000 Total estimated project cost=$8,000,000 41. Barker Rd Improvement- Spokane River to Euclid — p+akane ,,. ,_ �.., ..., Valley _ .,:iir af 1 ti 4 o RAY • e,• i - T. :t t "%., z 1 - Euclid Ave. d ' r Barker-Spokane River to Euclid xi } rye 4 '+),clot.ii t:.� R A 4-.`al _ _ • * r 1 -7s "' • e 4..;. ,,...Lets'„Ai'.1 iirr 1 x. Y. r . ^ w e y q +tib rr } Y + s�C; S•oka'H7eRiver t [ Hall.t "'• " 4N '°Mryl 3 ,I.�,y:O F�.: _» w ,.. , - f .._N. L DI —--- ,o. 't44' .'5:•-lifi -.• * is p v North r .. �y 1,65- Mag f 111 r 'Shy. .10 4 4 ii, P*.,,Nliv ht)1,, .°-r'61 �4� .' fi, - 4 , r'' �'*. Y` _ [ . I•. °• 1 1- Win,. `I I k �- 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project scription: Barker Road from the Spokane River to Euclid intersection will be widened to a 5-lane roadway with 2 lanes in each direction and a middle turn lane,and will include bike lanes,sidewalks and swales. Benefits of Project: Barker Road accesses the heart of the city's industrial area and traffic is expected to grow by 38%by year 2040. Widening the road anticipates future growth and will be in place as the industrial land is developed. Adding bike lanes and sidewalks will ex- tend access to the Centennial Trail along the Spokane River,STA bus stop Route 98, and to various commercial businesses. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$378,000 Right of Way(RW) =$25,000 Note: The construction of the project is estimated to be$2,899,000 and is programmed for year 2022. 42. Barker Rd/BNSF Grade Separation SlifikaVallr ey e Ems �' . . - Barker Rd18NSF Grade r .;' s Separation Project :h V a 44- 'tis• Argy,I _-_ 290 _ +fir 40 _ - gi - ,_ _ North 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Project Description: The Project builds an overpass for Barker Road over the BNSF tracks,adds on-and off-ramps from Barker Road to Trent Avenue (SR-290), incorporates a realignment of Wellesley Ave,and provides safe passage for bikes and pedestrians across both the BNSF rail line and SR-290. In addition,the Project would eliminate train-vehicle conflicts, remove automobile delays,and improve the level-of service(LOS) rating for the intersection from "F"to "A." Benefits of Project: The Project would eliminate train-vehicle conflicts, remove automobile delays, and improve the LOS for the intersection from "F"to"A."The realignment of Wellesley Avenue mitigates congestion on SR-290 by consolidating access points for Barker and Wellesley into one interchange. The addition of bike and ADA compliant pedestrian access on the overpass encourages alterna- tive modes of transportation to nearby businesses, residences and schools. Project Cost Estimate: Preliminary Engineering(PE)=$1,538,000 Right of Way(RW) =$450,000 Note: These costs are costs to begin the PE and RW phases in 2021.Total estimated costs for this project including construction is expected to be$29,200,000. City of Spokane Valley N r ■ Sullivan-Wellesley _ ' \b Draft 2016 - 2021 Six Year TIP I :1i3I��lnkrsectionImprovement v 8arkerOood W L 1 E Project /// - \,�`/ I Wellesley �� MEM ''1 ................„.....„..,,,,,...,_/-• BNSF Grade Separation ' \�,. A Sullivan Trent to Wellesley ` 71 II� 0 Corridor Lighting ._ J N :v■ Barker Road �__ ?1 Euclidto 0.1 mile south �G ■w__.0 o f Trent(SR 290) Sul .=■��III�C r� 1111 111 1 '�✓� Pines SR27Conc to Intersectio .■m1� �I _ r �BNSPunderpass """1.11P,_ Euclid ��■111111 `�� +�� E `�• ■ Bae er Raad y _ Spokane Rver to Euclid o 11117 11_ Ice,,, ,I . .-.EMINImit, 11 Sullivan �J 117 , 1011°W RS Project 1;0 Ir ana Lield _Ain Slim' ull an Road Argonne R tl& 90 jIl Mission S.Pines(SR 2n NO ,■ Seth Woodward ElementaryIC Bridge Widening \ Improvement Project`-ndl t ONE*`��ZV 11111„... r1 ■ Intersection Im let •p SdewalklmprovemeM / ■..■� r " C M onskPark i� '�„ �� Argonne Roatl 1' mission' dv9 anwaim i � ` �i I� Concrete I_ � - ,� � 1► \(� /r ,,Y 1 /_� 1 I1-90 to Montgom ryyj�' will LI■ imi _ ��?%��/� C Argonne Road mtl Indiana �� _�_ 2411411111b..4.. . .. . r �� 0/�/ `_ `I` ■■■■� �, IIII.■�■,'�'■� n- — �� Road Improvement Project Faucher/BNSF Project overpass I MENN .1 III■� _ffiI• y 2. S Ave PP eway Il B�oadwa �— A 1 to 1-90 Repair , ■ Broadway/ Prague II. `�.a■1 Joint Re Pro'ect _=t -. , ■■■& Y� 11�—� •�'Sullivan to Corbin S Argonne Reulcan 1 �� /♦ � I.• Pavement Preservation , r PragueionImpr ■MM �945.-"7. ��„ . �� ,,cont to lMe tions .Applew�y frail =1 _ �,� 1111 OW lute rs edion Improvements '^ Park Roadp2 _� Universto BalfourPark `�03 Ir.*: I. /�mon P I'w EYiral �//w��nd ana i�E:m. r ; I PPpp ■iMEOW d I• -�iYergree �� i� MEI - I. � ' � �`�� .Barker Roatl 41111111111111111 ...I N Sprague T r = ' . ipisopm cev times to APPleway rjutimmu 4th ■,� -■ .dw — \ II oPPodaney Elementary A IewaY iral 4IMMIZAM I�,� �� Appleway �-��.SRTS Bowdsh Road) II PP APP" —ilarhY-- LitESIFA E��_ \ 11 `� — �� ,�. ■ Evergreen to Sullivan SUllvanto Corbin =MHO rr. —� Park to DshmanM ca MILIEUS •• FS1iI7� ' + ■u.■■rte /STI '' �'�11 � '� J �� Preservation p, � � .. � . • ill ` —MN g v -- 4M!MDGRdRI4& .44fr I1y ' t/? T� 11. �F/ r 16th • ir i ...gram.1-2-....:. lk......,,, silt rea-Wsevg 1-4*4. .ir- a jalL.44 W._ 1211111Mir .4101 .ffirl ,),t_ mummimmiNE .r... r--- 4ECt `^�� jI 1 RKAI �_== ====<<:1 MINK _I aissi Legend -.�c__+� u�m-invir I Project Year / r m ‘11‘. ` ® '� ..- �l k2016 • 2019 :/ l y 2017 ' 2020 Cl'fl(3€' 44th air okra ne I' . — 2018 2021 ,^'Risido Projects Not Shown: Valle -� Il Sidewalk Infill Project I • e Reflective Signal Backplate Project June 15,2015 I I l* r ` -►`71 2016-2021 Street Preservation Projects S CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award — Montgomery Street Preservation Project #0218 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: November 17, 2014 Adopted 2015 Budget, Resolution 14-015 which included this street preservation project; Information RCA on June 2, 2015. BACKGROUND: The Montgomery Avenue Street Preservation project will place a two-inch asphalt overlay on Montgomery Avenue between University Road and Dartmouth Lane. The pedestrian ramps and the storm water facilities will be updated as well. This project is funded with $327,782 from Fund 311 for the street preservation work and $93,218 from Fund 402 for stormwater improvements. Public Works staff designed the project. Bids were advertised on May 22 and were opened on Friday, June 5, 2015. A copy of the Bid Tabulation is attached. OPTIONS: Award the contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Montgomery Street Preservation project, #0218 to Inland Asphalt Company in the amount of $344,326 and authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Council approved the 2015 Budget with $2,615,050 in Fund 311 for Street Preservation projects. The overall budget for the Montgomery Street Preservation Project is $421,000 with $327,782 from Fund 311 and $93,218 from Fund 402. The stormwater expenditures from Fund 402 are reimbursable by a Department of Ecology Stormwater grant. There are sufficient funds to cover the cost of this project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, PE — Senior Capital Projects Engineer Eric Guth, PE - Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulation BID TABULATION Spokane ley Montgomery St Pres-Dartmouth to University Project CIP No.0218- Bid Opening Date 6/5/2015 Engineers Estimate Inland Asphalt Co Shamrock Paving Item# Units Quantity Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Unit Price Total Cost Sched A - 100 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 L.S. $33,800.00 L.S. $40,000.00 101 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYING L.S. 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 L.S. $6,145.00 L.S. $7,500.00 102 SPCC PLAN L.S. 1 $500.00 $500.00 L.S. $500.00 L.S. $500.00 103 EROSION CONTROL L.S. 1 $500.00 $500.00 L.S. $1,100.00 L.S. $1,000.00 104 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL L.S. 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 L.S. $39,000.00 L.S. $45,000.00 105 PORTABLE CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGN HR. 1700 $3.00 $5,100.00 $1.60 $2,720.00 $3.50 $5,950.00 106 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF-IN 1100 $1.00 $1,100.00 $0.30 $330.00 $0.75 $825.00 107 REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT S.Y. 30 $10.00 $300.00 $19.50 $585.00 $20.00 $600.00 108 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 150 $12.00 $1,800.00 $6.30 $945.00 $10.00 $1,500.00 109 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 55 $15.00 $825.00 $25.00 $1,375.00 $22.00 $1,210.00 110 SHOULDERING L.F. 160 $50.00 $8,000.00 $8.00 $1,280.00 $5.00 $800.00 111 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 120 $20.00 $2,400.00 $15.40 $1,848.00 $50.00 $6,000.00 112 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,4 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 60 $20.00 $1,200.00 $30.00 $1,800.00 $20.00 $1,200.00 113 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,8 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 35 $30.00 $1,050.00 $61.00 $2,135.00 $55.00 $1,925.00 114 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,2IN.DEPTH S.Y. 500 $5.00 $2,500.00 $10.50 $5,250.00 $9.00 $4,500.00 115 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,1/4 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 4300 $2.00 $8,600.00 $2.25 $9,675.00 $4.00 $17,200.00 116 PLANING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,TAPER GRIND S.Y. 3900 $3.00 $11,700.00 $3.45 $13,455.00 $4.50 $17,550.00 117 HMA CL.1/2"PG 70-28 0.17 FT.DEPTH S.Y. 8600 $9.00 $77,400.00 $8.90 $76,540.00 $13.00 $111,800.00 118 HMA CL.1/2"PG 70-28 0.50 FT.DEPTH,PATCH S.Y. 35 $50.00 $1,750.00 $82.00 $2,870.00 $110.00 $3,850.00 119 JOINT ADHESIVE L.F. 2100 $1.00 $2,100.00 $0.85 $1,785.00 $1.00 $2,100.00 120 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 CALC $1.00 CALC $1.00 121 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 CALC $1.00 CALC $1.00 122 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 110 $25.00 $2,750.00 $16.00 $1,760.00 $20.00 $2,200.00 123 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 20 $40.00 $800.00 $63.00 $1,260.00 $35.00 $700.00 124 CEMENT CONCRETE CURB RAMP TYPE PARALLEL A EACH 3 $1,200.00 $3,600.00 $250.00 $750.00 $1,900.00 $5,700.00 125 CEMENT CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN CURB L.F. 65 $15.00 $975.00 $16.00 $1,040.00 $15.40 $1,001.00 126 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE EACH 6 $600.00 $3,600.00 $675.00 $4,050.00 $600.00 $3,600.00 127 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 1 $600.00 $600.00 $675.00 $675.00 $600.00 $600.00 128 ADJUST EXISTING WATER VALVE EACH 12 $250.00 $3,000.00 $580.00 $6,960.00 $450.00 $5,400.00 129 ADJUST EXISTING UTILITY VAULT EACH 1 $800.00 $800.00 $680.00 $680.00 $900.00 $900.00 130 SOD INSTALLATION S.Y. 10 $50.00 $500.00 $54.00 $540.00 $60.00 $600.00 131 TOPSOIL,TYPE B S.Y. 10 $50.00 $500.00 $54.00 $540.00 $60.00 $600.00 132 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REVISION EACH 1 $500.00 $500.00 $550.00 $550.00 $600.00 $600.00 133 RIVER ROCK S.Y. 10 $50.00 $500.00 $54.00 $540.00 $60.00 $600.00 134 TEMPORARY PAVEMENT MARKING L.F. 6800 $0.60 $4,080.00 $0.27 $1,836.00 $0.50 $3,400.00 135 PLASTIC LINE L.F. 6100 $3.00 $18,300.00 $2.25 $13,725.00 $2.50 $15,250.00 136 PLASTIC WIDE LANE LINE L.F. 3200 $8.00 $25,600.00 $6.60 $21,120.00 $7.25 $23,200.00 137 PLASTIC TRAFFIC ARROW EACH 9 $100.00 $900.00 $225.00 $2,025.00 $230.00 $2,070.00 138 PLASTIC BICYCLE LANE SYMBOL EACH 4 $300.00 $1,200.00 $225.00 $900.00 $215.00 $860.00 139 PLASTIC RAILROAD CROSSING SYMBOL EACH 1 $700.00 $700.00 $1,220.00 $1,220.00 $1,350.00 $1,350.00 Total Sched A - $256,732.00 $263,311.00 $339,643.00 Sched B - 200 TRENCH EXCAVATION SAFETY SYSTEM L.S. 1 $500.00 $500.00 L.S. $680.00 L.S. $300.00 201 STORMWATER PATCH REMOVAL S.Y. 160 $15.00 $2,400.00 $22.00 $3,520.00 $10.00 $1,600.00 202 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 25 $12.00 $300.00 $6.50 $162.50 $10.00 $250.00 203 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE CURB L.F. 110 $12.00 $1,320.00 $7.00 $770.00 $11.00 $1,210.00 204 REMOVE CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK/DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 85 $15.00 $1,275.00 $36.00 $3,060.00 $22.00 $1,870.00 205 SAWCUT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF-IN 2300 $1.00 $2,300.00 $0.30 $690.00 $0.75 $1,725.00 206 REMOVE INLET EACH 1 $250.00 $250.00 $320.00 $320.00 $300.00 $300.00 207 REMOVE STORM DRAIN PIPE L.F. 5 $10.00 $50.00 $10.60 $53.00 $20.00 $100.00 208 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,2 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 40 $20.00 $800.00 $16.00 $640.00 $50.00 $2,000.00 209 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,4 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 85 $20.00 $1,700.00 $30.00 $2,550.00 $20.00 $1,700.00 210 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,6 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 55 $25.00 $1,375.00 $46.00 $2,530.00 $50.00 $2,750.00 211 CRUSHED SURFACING TOP COURSE,8 IN.DEPTH S.Y. 220 $30.00 $6,600.00 $61.00 $13,420.00 $40.00 $8,800.00 212 HMA CL.1/2"PG 70-28 0.50 FT.DEPTH S.Y. 220 $50.00 $11,000.00 $60.00 $13,200.00 $59.00 $12,980.00 213 HMA CL.1/2"PG 70-28 MISCELLANEOUS AREAS S.Y. 55 $50.00 $2,750.00 $34.00 $1,870.00 $40.00 $2,200.00 214 ASPHALT CURB,TYPE C L.F. 55 $45.00 $2,475.00 $12.00 $660.00 $10.00 $550.00 215 JOB MIX COMPLIANCE PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 CALC $1.00 CALC $1.00 216 COMPACTION PRICE ADJUSTMENT CALC 1 $1.00 $1.00 CALC $1.00 CALC $1.00 217 SOLID WALL PVC STORM SEWER PIPE 10IN.DIA. L.F. 80 $50.00 $4,000.00 $74.00 $5,920.00 $50.00 $4,000.00 218 CONNECTION TO EXISTING DRYWELL EACH 7 $600.00 $4,200.00 $955.00 $6,685.00 $600.00 $4,200.00 219 CATCH BASIN TYPE 1 EACH 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 $1,390.00 $9,730.00 $1,550.00 $10,850.00 220 ADJUST EXISTING CATCH BASIN OR DRYWELL EACH 2 $600.00 $1,200.00 $680.00 $1,360.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 221 REPLACE EXISTING CONE EACH 1 $700.00 $700.00 $600.00 $600.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 222 TYPE 4 FRAME AND SOLID COVER EACH 7 $500.00 $3,500.00 $425.00 $2,975.00 $750.00 $5,250.00 223 SPILL CONTROL SEPARATOR EACH 7 $500.00 $3,500.00 $465.00 $3,255.00 $500.00 $3,500.00 224 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB AND GUTTER L.F. 25 $25.00 $625.00 $17.70 $442.50 $28.00 $700.00 225 CEMENT CONCRETE TRAFFIC CURB L.F. 110 $20.00 $2,200.00 $16.00 $1,760.00 $20.00 $2,200.00 226 CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK S.Y. 60 $40.00 $2,400.00 $46.00 $2,760.00 $35.00 $2,100.00 227 CEMENT CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACH S.Y. 25 $50.00 $1,250.00 $56.00 $1,400.00 $42.00 $1,050.00 Total Sched B - $69,172.00 $81,015.00 $74,587.00 TOTAL(All schedules) $325,904.00 $344,326.00 $414,230.00 Addendums acknowledged Bid deposit surety bond CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Bid Award, Mansfield Ave Connection Project #0156 GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 3.35.10 — Contract Authority PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: (1) Adoption of the 2012-2017 Six Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) on June 28, 2011 (Resolution #11-005), which included this project; (2) Informational RCA on 2011 TIB Call for Projects (FY2013) on July 5, 2011; Admin Report on 2011 TIB Call for Projects on July 19, 2011; (3) Approval to move ahead with TIB Grant Applications on August 9, 2011; (4) Approval to move ahead with Mansfield Ave Connection TIB Grant Application on August 23, 2011; (5) Approval to sign the TIB Fuel Tax Grant Distribution Agreement on December 6, 2011; (6) Adoption of the 2013-2018 Six Year TIP on June 26, 2012 (Resolution #12-003), which included this project; (7) Adoption of the 2014-2019 Six Year TIP on June 11, 2013 (Resolution #13-006), which included this project; (8) Adoption of the 2015-2020 Six Year TIP on June 24, 2012 (Resolution #14-006), which included this project; (9) Info RCA on upcoming bid award, June 9, 2015. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley was successful in receiving a CMAQ (Congestion Mitigation/Air Quality) grant for design and right-of-way acquisition, and a TIB (Transportation Improvement Board) grant for construction of the Mansfield Avenue Connection Project. This project will connect two separated parts of Mansfield Avenue, between Pines Road and Mirabeau Parkway into a single, continuous roadway with center turn lane, sidewalks and bike lanes. The project was advertised on June 5, 2015, and bids are scheduled to be opened on June 19, 2015. After opening bids and tabulating the results, staff will present the results at the Tuesday, June 23, 2015 Council meeting for award of the contract to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder. OPTIONS: Award the Mansfield Ave Connection Project to the lowest responsible bidder or take other appropriate action. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to award the Mansfield Ave Connection Project to the lowest responsible bidder, in the amount of $ and to authorize the City Manager to finalize and execute the construction contract. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The grant-eligible work is estimated at $1,680,200. The local match for this work is $124,450 from REET (Fund 301), and a private developer has contributed $197,700 toward the project. STAFF CONTACT: Steve M. Worley, P.E., Senior Capital Projects Engineer, Eric Guth, P.E., Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Bid Tabulations will be provided at the Council Meeting CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: ❑ Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Justice Assistance 2015 Grant Application GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: N/A BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley has been allocated $19,737 as part of the 2015 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. These funds are designed to support all components of the criminal justice system. Spokane Valley staff has relied on recommendations of the Spokane Valley Police Chief to identify proposed projects to be funded with the grant. The Police Chief and the City Manager have recommended spending the funds on enhancing the camera and security system at the Precinct Building. OPTIONS: 1.) Authorize application for the JAG grant; 2.) Request amendments to the application; or 3.) Deny authorization to submit grant. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to Authorize the City Manager to Apply for the Justice Assistance Grant. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: $19,737 in grants funds, no match required. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: JAG Solicitation, Program Narrative, JAG Abstract Review Narrative, Budget Worksheet, Budget Narrative OMB No. 1121-0329 U.S. Department of Justice Approval Expires 07/31/2016 Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Assistance The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs' (OJP) Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) is seeking applications for funding under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. This program furthers the Department's mission by assisting state, local, and tribal efforts to prevent or reduce crime and violence. Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program FY 2015 Local Solicitation Eligibility Applicants are limited to units of local government appearing on the FY 2015 JAG Allocations List. To view this list, go to www.bja.qov/proqrams/jag/15jagallocations.html. For JAG Program purposes, a unit of local government is: a town, township, village, parish, city, county, borough, or other general purpose political subdivision of a state; or, it may also be a federally recognized Indian tribe that performs law enforcement functions (as determined by the Secretary of the Interior). Otherwise a unit of local government may be any law enforcement district or judicial enforcement district established under applicable state law with authority to independently establish a budget and impose taxes. In Louisiana, a unit of local government means a district attorney or parish sheriff. For additional eligibility information, see section C. Eligibility Information. Deadline Applicants must register in OJP's Grants Management System (GMS) prior to submitting an application for this funding opportunity. Registration is required for all applicants, even those previously registered in GMS. Select the"Apply Online" button associated with the solicitation title. All registrations and applications are due by 8:00 p.m. eastern time on June 26, 2015. For additional information, see"How to Apply" in Section D. Application and Submission Information. Contact Information For technical assistance with submitting an application, contact the Grants Management System Support Hotline at 1-888-549-9901, option 3, or via e-mail to GMS.HeIpDesk a(�usdoi.gov. The GMS Support Hotline hours of operation are Monday—Friday from 6:00 a.m. to midnight eastern time, except federal holidays. Applicants that experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond their control that prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must e-mail the BJA contact identified below within 24 hours after the application deadline and request approval to submit their application. Additional information on reporting technical issues is found under"Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues" in the How to Apply section. For assistance with any other requirement of this solicitation, contact the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS) Response Center: toll-free at 1-800-851-3420; via TTY at 301-240-6310 (hearing impaired only); email responsecenterncirs.qov; fax to 301-240-5830; or web chat at https://webcontact.ncirs.gov/ncichat/chat.isp. The NCJRS Response Center hours of operation are 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday, and 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. eastern time on the solicitation close date. You may also contact your State Policy Advisor. Release date: May 12, 2015 2 • BJA-2015-4167 Contents A. Program Description 4 Overview 4 Program-Specific Information 4 Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables 4 Evidence-Based Programs or Practices 4 B. Federal Award Information 7 Type of Award 7 Financial Management and System of Internal Controls 8 Budget Information 9 Cost Sharing or Match Requirement 10 Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals 10 Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs 10 Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) 11 C. Eligibility Information 13 Cost Sharing or Match Requirement 13 Limit on Number of Application Submissions 13 D. Application and Submission Information 13 What an Application Should Include 13 How to Apply 20 E. Application Review Information 22 Review Process 22 F. Federal Award Administration Information 23 Federal Award Notices 23 Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements 23 General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements 24 G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) 24 H. Other Information 24 Provide Feedback to OJP 24 Application Checklist 25 3 BJA-2015-4167 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: FY 2015 Local Solicitation (CFDA #16.738) A. Program Description Overview The Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program (42 U.S.C. § 3751(a)) is the primary provider of federal criminal justice funding to state and local jurisdictions. The JAG Program provides states and units of local governments with critical funding necessary to support a range of program areas including law enforcement, prosecution and court programs, prevention and education programs, corrections and community corrections, drug treatment and enforcement, crime victim and witness initiatives, and planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs. Program-Specific Information JAG funds may be used for state and local initiatives, technical assistance, strategic planning, research and evaluation (including forensics), data collection, training, personnel, equipment, forensic laboratories, supplies, contractual support, and criminal justice information systems that will improve or enhance such areas as: • Law enforcement programs. • Prosecution and court programs, including indigent defense. • Prevention and education programs. • Corrections and community corrections programs. • Drug treatment and enforcement programs. • Planning, evaluation, and technology improvement programs. • Crime victim and witness programs (other than compensation). *Please note that JAG funding may be utilized in support of: • Systems upgrades (hardware/software), including potential upgrades necessary for state, territories, units of local government and/or tribes to come into compliance with the FBI's UCR Redevelopment Project (UCRRP). • Developing or sustaining state compatible incident based reporting systems. Goals, Objectives, and Deliverables The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of an eligible unit of local government or other officer designated by the CEO must submit the application for JAG funds. A unit of local government receiving a JAG award will be responsible for the administration of the funds including: distributing the funds; monitoring the award; submitting quarterly financial status (SF-425) and performance metrics reports and semi-annual programmatic reports; and providing ongoing oversight and assistance to any subrecipients of the funds. Evidence-Based Programs or Practices OJP strongly emphasizes the use of data and evidence in policy making and program development in criminal justice,juvenile justice, and crime victim services. OJP is committed to: • Improving the quantity and quality of evidence OJP generates. 4 BJA-2015-4167 • Integrating evidence into program, practice, and policy decisions within OJP and the field. • Improving the translation of evidence into practice. OJP considers programs and practices to be evidence-based when their effectiveness has been demonstrated by causal evidence, generally obtained through one or more outcome evaluations. Causal evidence documents a relationship between an activity or intervention (including technology) and its intended outcome, including measuring the direction and size of a change, and the extent to which a change may be attributed to the activity or intervention. Causal evidence depends on the use of scientific methods to rule out, to the extent possible, alternative explanations for the documented change. The strength of causal evidence, based on the factors described above, will influence the degree to which OJP considers a program or practice to be evidence-based. OJP's CrimeSolutions.qov web site is one resource that applicants may use to find information about evidence-based programs in criminal justice, juvenile justice, and crime victim services. A useful matrix of evidence-based policing programs and strategies is available through the Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University. In the reentry field, a summary of research-based reentry strategies is available on the National Reentry Resource Center's What Works in Reentry Clearinghouse. BJA offers a number of program models designed to effectively implement evidence-based strategies including Smart Policing, Smart Supervision, Smart Pretrial, Smart Defense and Smart Prosecution. BJA encourages states to use JAG funds to support these"smart on crime" strategies, including effective partnerships with universities and research partners and with non-traditional criminal justice partners. JAG Priority Areas BJA recognizes that there are significant pressures on state and local criminal justice systems. In these challenging times, shared priorities and leveraged resources can make a significant impact. In light of this, it is important to make SAAs and local JAG recipients aware of several areas of priority that may be of help in maximizing the effectiveness of JAG funding at the state and local level. The following priorities represent key areas where BJA will focus nationally and invite each state and local JAG recipient to join us in addressing these challenges as a part of our JAG partnership: Reducing Gun Violence Gun violence has touched nearly every state, county, city, town, and tribal government in America. In an effort to address this continuing need BJA encourages states and localities to invest valuable JAG funds in programs to: combat gun violence, enforce existing firearms laws, improve the process used to ensure that those prohibited from purchasing or owning guns are prevented from doing so, enhance reporting to the Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI) National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) and provide active shooter response training to law enforcement officers and first responders. While our nation has made great strides in reducing violent crime over the last decade, some municipalities and regions continue to experience unacceptable levels of violent crime at rates far in excess of the national average. In 2014, as part of BJA's longstanding commitment to support effective strategies to reduce violent crime, BJA launched the Violence Reduction Network. By the end of FY 2015, 10 VRN sites, working with a broad network of federal, state, and local partners will be implementing data-driven evidence-based strategies to reduce deeply entrenched violent crime in those communities. SAAs and localities with VRN sites are strongly 5 BJA-2015-4167 encouraged to join the VRN and help address funding gaps in violence reduction efforts in those communities. For information on VRN, see www.bia.gov/ProgramsNRN.html. Body-Worn Cameras, Storage, and Policies Over the past several years, law enforcement agencies across the country have begun equipping their officers with body-worn cameras (BWCs). The important benefits of BWCs, and the challenges in implementing BWC programs, are highlighted in several recent publications: see the Office of Justice Programs' Diagnostic Center report Police Officer Body-Worn Cameras:Assessing the Evidence, and the COPS Office and Police Executive Research Forum paper, Implementing A Body-Worn Camera Program: Recommendations and Lessons Learned. JAG funding is an important potential source of funding for law enforcement agencies implementing new BWC programs or enhancing existing programs. JAG funds may be used to purchase BWCs and for costs associated with the BWC program, such as storage and policy development. Similarly, SAAs are encouraged to use either their Variable Pass-Through (VPT) or their"less than $10,000"funding that is added into the state award to set aside funds to assist small departments in implementing BWC programs. Agencies using JAG funds to purchase BWC equipment or to implement or enhance BWC programs should, as a best practice, have policies and procedures in place related to equipment usage, data storage, privacy, victims, access, disclosure, training, etc. Officers, prosecutors, defenders, victims and privacy advocates, and community groups should be consulted early in the BWC policy development process to guide and inform policy and procurement decisions. BJA plans to release a BWC Toolkit and web site in spring 2015 that will share model BWC policies, resources, and best practices to assist departments in implementing BWC programs. Recidivism Reduction, Pretrial Reform, and Justice System Realignment In this time of fiscal austerity and smaller state and local budgets, reducing unnecessary incarceration in a manner that promotes public safety is a paramount goal. Effective community supervision of non-violent offenders coupled with evidence-based program interventions can result in significant reductions in recidivism. A priority funding area is the implementation of effective pretrial services programs. The use of validated risk assessment tools to inform pre- trial release decisions is critical. For a variety of resources, or to request BJA supported technical assistance from the Pretrial Justice Institute, see www.pretrial.org. Another priority for JAG funding is to support innovative programs and approaches in probation and parole supervision that improve services to offenders and increase collaborative efforts among community supervision agencies with law enforcement and the courts. Another promising approach to justice systems reform is the Justice Reinvestment Initiative (JRI), a public-private partnership between BJA and the PEW Public Safety Performance Project. Currently, 17 states and 17 local governments are working to control spiraling incarceration costs through JRI and reinvesting in evidence-based criminal justice programs and strategies. Strategic investment of JAG funds to implement JRI legislation and policy changes in those states and localities can augment federal funds and achieve greater cost savings and reinvestments in programs to promote public safety. (See the Urban Institute's Justice Reinvestment Initiative State Assessment Report.) Indigent Defense Another key priority area is support for indigent defense. BJA continues to encourage states and SAAs to use JAG funds to support the vital needs of the indigent defense community, as 6 BJA-2015-4167 indigent defense reform continues to be a concern that needs to be addressed across the nation. In 2002, the American Bar Association (ABA) published Ten Principles of a Public Defense Delivery System which represent fundamental building blocks for implementing quality legal representation for indigent defendants. Improving Mental Health Services Disproportionate numbers of people with mental illness are involved in the criminal justice system often as a result of untreated or undertreated mental illness. This is an issue that impacts numerous facets of the criminal justice system. BJA encourages states to utilize JAG funding in support of programs and policy changes aimed at the following: identifying and treating people with severe mental illness before they reach crisis point; training law enforcement and correctional officers on mental health and mental health related crisis- intervention; increasing justice system diversion strategies to divert offenders with mental illness from unnecessary arrest and incarceration to more appropriate and cost-effective community- based treatment and supervision; mental health courts, allowing inmates to continue psychotropic medication in jails; and improving oversight of mental health care in jails, increasing post-jail housing options and enhancing community mental health services. (See Adults with Behavioral Health Needs under Correctional Supervision.) BJA provides technical assistance to states with increasing access to health care benefits. Information can be found at: www.bjatraininq.org. B. Federal Award Information BJA estimates that it will make up to 1,100 Local and 56 State/Territory awards totaling an estimated $255.7 million. Awards of at least$25,000 are 4 years in length, and award periods will be from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2018. Extensions beyond this period may be made on a case-by- case basis at the discretion of BJA and must be requested via GMS no less than 30 days prior to the grant end date. Awards of less than $25,000 are 2 years in length, and award periods will be from October 1, 2014 through September 30, 2016. Extensions of up to 2 years can be requested for these awards via GMS no less than 30 days prior to the grant end date, and will be automatically granted upon request. All awards are subject to the availability of appropriated funds and to any modifications or additional requirements that may be imposed by law. Eligible allocations under JAG are posted annually on BJA's JAG web page: www.bja.qov/ProgramDetails.aspx?Program ID=59. Type of Award' BJA expects that it will make any award from this solicitation in the form of a grant. JAG awards are based on a statutory formula as described below: 1 See generally 31 U.S.C.§§6301-6305(defines and describes various forms of federal assistance relationships, including grants and cooperative agreements(a type of grant)). 7 BJA-2015-4167 Once each fiscal year's overall JAG Program funding level is determined, BJA partners with the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)to begin a four-step grant award calculation process which consists of: 1. Computing an initial JAG allocation for each state and territory, based on their share of violent crime and population (weighted equally). 2. Reviewing the initial JAG allocation amount to determine if the state or territory allocation is less than the minimum ("de minimus") award amount defined in the JAG legislation (0.25 percent of the total). If this is the case, the state or territory is funded at the minimum level, and the funds required for this are deducted from the overall pool of JAG funds. Each of the remaining states receives the minimum award plus an additional amount based on their share of violent crime and population. 3. Dividing each state's final award amount (except for the territories and District of Columbia) between state and local governments at a rate of 60 and 40 percent, respectively. 4. Determining local unit of government award allocations, which are based on their proportion of the state's 3-year violent crime average. If a local eligible award amount is less than $10,000, the funds are returned to the state to be awarded to these local units of government through the state agency. If the eligible award amount is $10,000 or more, then the local government is eligible to apply for a JAG award directly from BJA. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls If selected for funding, the award recipient must: (a) Establish and maintain effective internal control over the federal award that provides reasonable assurance that the non-federal entity is managing the federal award in compliance with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal award. These internal controls should be in compliance with guidance in "Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government" issued by the Comptroller General of the United States and the"Internal Control Integrated Framework", issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). (b) Comply with federal statutes, regulations, and the terms and conditions of the federal awards. (c) Evaluate and monitor the non-federal entity's compliance with statute, regulations and the terms and conditions of federal awards. (d) Take prompt action when instances of noncompliance are identified including noncompliance identified in audit findings. (e) Take reasonable measures to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other information the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity designates as sensitive or the non-federal entity considers sensitive consistent with applicable federal, state, and local laws regarding privacy and obligations of confidentiality. 8 BJA-2015-4167 In order to better understand administrative requirements and cost principles, award applicants are encouraged to enroll, at no charge, in the Department of Justice Grants Financial Management Online Training available here. Budget Information Administrative Funds—A unit of local government may use up to 10 percent of the award, including interest, for costs associated with administering JAG funds. Disparate Certification —A disparate allocation occurs when a city or municipality is allocated one-and-one-half times (150 percent) more than the county, while the county bears more than 50 percent of the costs associated with prosecution or incarceration of the municipality's Part 1 violent crimes. A disparate allocation also occurs when multiple cities or municipalities are collectively allocated four times (400 percent) more than the county, and the county bears more than 50 percent of the collective costs associated with prosecution or incarceration of each municipality's Part 1 violent crimes. • Jurisdictions certified as disparate must identify a fiscal agent that will submit a joint application for the aggregate eligible allocation to all disparate municipalities. The joint application must determine and specify the award distribution to each unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. When beginning the JAG application process, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicant/fiscal agent for joint funds must be completed and signed by the Authorized Representative for each participating jurisdiction. The signed MOU should be attached to the application. For a sample MOU, go to www.bja.gov/Funding/JAGMOU.pdf. Supplantinq —Supplanting is prohibited under JAG. Applicants cannot replace or supplant non- federal funds that have been appropriated for the same purpose. See the JAG FAQs on BJA's JAG web page for examples of supplanting. Leveraging of Grant Funds—Although supplanting is prohibited, the leveraging of federal funding is encouraged. For example, a city may utilize JAG and Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP) money to fund different portions of a fusion center project. In instances where leveraging occurs, all federal grant funds must be tracked and reported separately and may not be used to fund the same line items. Additionally, federal funds cannot be used as match for other federal awards. Trust Fund — Units of Local government may draw down JAG funds in advance. To do so, a trust fund must be established in which to deposit the funds. The trust fund may or may not be an interest-bearing account. If subrecipients draw down JAG funds in advance, they also must establish a trust fund in which to deposit funds. This trust fund requirement does not apply to direct JAG award recipients or subrecipients that draw-down on a reimbursement basis rather than in advance. Prohibited and Controlled Uses—JAG funds may only be expended within the JAG purpose areas. Within these purpose areas JAG funds may not be used directly or indirectly for security enhancements or equipment to nongovernmental entities not engaged in criminal justice or public safety. In addition, JAG funds may not be used directly or indirectly to purchase items listed at: w',v',v.bia.aov/Funding/JAGControlledPurchaseList.pdf. 9 BJA-2015-4167 This JAG controlled purchase list represents a combination of BJA controlled items and those controlled under the Executive Order on "Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Equipment Acquisition"that was signed on January 16, 2015. Pursuant to Executive Order 13688 (Federal Support for Local Law Enforcement Equipment Acquisition), a federal inter- agency working group has been charged with, among other things, `developing a consistent Government-wide list of controlled equipment allowable for acquisition by LEAs, as well as a list of those items that can only be transferred with special authorization and use limitations.'The working group's recommendations, which are due to be delivered to the President in mid-May, may alter the BJA controlled items list. Grantees are reminded that they must follow the most current version of the controlled items list in order to purchase the equipment. No items on this list can be purchased without first submitting a detailed justification that supports the need for this equipment. Applicants must show both extraordinary and exigent circumstances that require the purchase of such equipment. Upon approval from the BJA Director, this equipment may be purchased with JAG funds. Grantees are strongly encouraged to submit this justification at the time of application. In particular, any justification that cannot show the exigent nature of the purchase and why it could not be submitted at time of application will not be approved. Please note that the Controlled Equipment List also includes items that are strictly prohibited under JAG. Additional information on JAG controlled and prohibited items, along with the process for requesting a waiver to obtain BJA certification for any controlled item, can be found within the JAG FAQs: www.bia.gov/Funding/JAGFAQ.pdf. Cost Sharing or Match Requirement This solicitation does not require a match. However, if a successful application proposes a voluntary match amount, and OJP approves the budget, the total match amount incorporated into the approved budget becomes mandatory and subject to audit. Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals OJP does not typically approve pre-agreement costs; an applicant must request and obtain the prior written approval of OJP for all such costs. If approved, pre-agreement costs could be paid from grant funds consistent with a grantee's approved budget, and under applicable cost standards. However, all such costs prior to award and prior to approval of the costs are incurred at the sole risk of an applicant. Generally, no applicant should incur project costs before submitting an application requesting federal funding for those costs. Should there be extenuating circumstances that appear to be appropriate for OJP's consideration as pre- agreement costs, the applicant should contact the point of contact listed on the title page of this announcement for details on the requirements for submitting a written request for approval. See the section on Costs Requiring Prior Approval in the Financial Guide, for more information. Prior Approval, Planning, and Reporting of Conference/Meeting/Training Costs OJP strongly encourages applicants that propose to use award funds for any conference-, meeting-, or training-related activity to review carefully— before submitting an application —the OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting available at www.oip.qov/financialquide/PostawardRequirements/chapterl 5pagel.htm. OJP policy and guidance (1) encourage minimization of conference, meeting, and training costs; (2) require prior written approval (which may affect project timelines) of most such costs for cooperative 10 BJA-2015-4167 agreement recipients and of some such costs for grant recipients; and (3) set cost limits, including a general prohibition of all food and beverage costs. Costs Associated with Language Assistance (if applicable) If an applicant proposes a program or activity that would deliver services or benefits to individuals, the costs of taking reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to those services or benefits for individuals with limited English proficiency may be allowable. Reasonable steps to provide meaningful access to services or benefits may include interpretation or translation services where appropriate. For additional information, see the "Civil Rights Compliance" section_under"Solicitation Requirements" in the OJP Funding Resource Center. Other JAG Requirements Body Armor Certification • Ballistic-resistant and stab-resistant body armor can be funded through two BJA- administered programs: the JAG Program and the Bulletproof Vest Partnership (BVP) Program. • The BVP Program is designed to provide a critical resource to state and local law enforcement through the purchase of ballistic-resistant and stab-resistant body armor. A jurisdiction is able to request up to 50 percent of the cost of a vest with BVP funds. For more information on the BVP Program, including eligibility and application, refer to the BVP web page. • JAG funds may also be used to purchase vests for an agency, but they may not be used to pay for that portion of the ballistic-resistant vest (50 percent) that is not covered by BVP funds. Unlike BVP, JAG funds used to purchase vests do not require a 50 percent match. • Vests purchased with JAG funds may be purchased at any threat level, make, or model from any distributor or manufacturer, as long as the vests have been tested and found to comply with the latest applicable National Institute of Justice (NIJ) ballistic or stab standards. In addition, vests purchased must be American-made. Information on the latest NIJ standards can be found at: www.nii.gov/topics/technology/body-armor/safety-initiative.htm. As is the case in BVP, grantees who wish to purchase vests with JAG funds must certify that law enforcement agencies receiving vests have a written "mandatory wear" policy in effect. FAQs related to the mandatory wear policy and certifications can be found at www.bia.gov/Funding/JAGFAQ.pdf. This policy must be in place for at least all uniformed officers before any FY 2015 funding can be used by the agency for vests. There are no requirements regarding the nature of the policy other than it being a mandatory wear policy for all uniformed officers while on duty. The certification must be signed by the Authorized Representative and must be attached to the application. If the grantee proposes to change project activities to utilize JAG funds to purchase bulletproof vests after the application period (during the project period), the grantee must submit the signed certification to BJA at that time. A mandatory wear concept and issues paper and a model policy are available by contacting the BVP Customer Support Center vests(a�usdoi.gov or toll free at 1-877-758-3787. 11 BJA-2015-4167 A copy of the certification related to the mandatory wear can be found at: www.bla.qov/Funding/BodyArmorMandatoryWearCert.pdf. DNA Testing of Evidentiary Materials and Upload of DNA Profiles to a Database If JAG Program funds will be used for DNA testing of evidentiary materials, any resulting eligible DNA profiles must be uploaded to the Combined DNA Index System (CODIS, the national DNA database operated by the FBI by a government DNA lab with access to CODIS. No profiles generated with JAG funding may be entered into any other non-governmental DNA database without prior express written approval from BJA. For more information, refer to the NIJ DNA Backlog Reduction Program, available at www.nii.gov/topics/forensics/lab-operations/evidence- backloqs/Paqes/backloq-reduction-program.aspx. In addition, funds may not be used for purchase of DNA equipment and supplies when the resulting DNA profiles from such technology are not accepted for entry into CODIS. Interoperable Communications Grantees (including subgrantees) that are using FY 2015 JAG Program funds to support emergency communications activities (including the purchase of interoperable communications equipment and technologies such as voice-over-internet protocol bridging or gateway devices, or equipment to support the build out of wireless broadband networks in the 700 MHz public safety band under the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Waiver Order) must ensure: • Compliance with the FY 2015 SAFECOM Guidance on Emergency Communications Grants(including provisions on technical standards that ensure and enhance interoperable communications). • Adherence to the technical standards set forth in the FCC Waiver Order, or any succeeding FCC orders, rules, or regulations pertaining to broadband operations in the 700 MHz public safety band. • Projects support the Statewide Communication Interoperability Plan (SCIP) and are fully coordinated with the full-time Statewide Interoperability Coordinator(SWIC) in the state of the project. As the central coordination point for their state's interoperability effort, the SWIC plays a critical role, and can serve as a valuable resource. SWICs are responsible for the implementation of the SCIP through coordination and collaboration with the emergency response community. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Emergency Communications maintains a list of SWICs for each of the 56 states and territories. Contact OEChq.dhs.qov. • All communications equipment purchased with grant award funding (plus the quantity purchased of each item) is identified during quarterly performance metrics reporting. In order to promote information sharing and enable interoperability among disparate systems across the justice and public safety community, OJP requires the grantee to comply with DOJ's Global Justice Information Sharing Initiative guidelines and recommendations for this particular grant. Grantee shall conform to the Global Standards Package (GSP) and all constituent elements, where applicable, as described at: www.it.oip.gov/qsp qrantcondition. Grantees shall document planned approaches to information sharing and describe compliance to the GSP and appropriate privacy policy that protects shared information, or provide detailed justification for why an alternative approach is recommended. 12 BJA-2015-4167 JAG Showcase The JAG Showcase was designed to identify and highlight JAG projects that have demonstrated success or shown promise in reducing crime and positively impacting communities. BJA has now expanded the concept of the JAG Showcase to other BJA grant programs and created a new BJA Success Story web page. This web page will be a valuable resource for states, localities, territories, tribes and criminal justice professionals who seek to identify and learn about JAG and other successful BJA funded projects linked to innovation, crime reduction, and evidence based practices. BJA strongly encourages the recipient to submit annual (or more frequent) JAG success stories. If you have a JAG Success Story you would like to submit, sign in to your My BJA account to access the Success Story Submission form. If you do not have a My BJA account, please Register. Once you register, one of the available areas on your My BJA page will be "My Success Stories."Within this box, you will see an option to add a Success Story. Once reviewed and approved by BJA, all success stories will appear on the BJA Success Story web page. C. Eligibility Information For eligibility information, please see the Title Page. Cost Sharing or Match Requirement For additional information on cost sharing or match requirement, see Section B. Federal Award Information. Limit on Number of Application Submissions If an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, BJA will review only the most recent system-validated version submitted. For more information on system-validated versions, see How to Apply. D. Application and Submission Information What an Application Should Include Applicants should anticipate that if they fail to submit an application that contains all of the specified elements, it may negatively affect the review of their application; and, should a decision be made to make an award, it may result in the inclusion of special conditions that preclude the recipient from accessing or using award funds pending satisfaction of the conditions. Applicants may combine the Budget Narrative and the Budget Detail Worksheet in one document. However, if an applicant submits only one budget document, it must contain both narrative and detail information. Please review the "Note on File Names and File Types" under How to Apply to be sure applications are submitted in permitted formats. Refer to the BJA Grant Writing and Management Academy and OJP's Grants 101 for an overview of what should be included in each application requirement. These trainings can be found at bja.ncjrs.gov/gwma/index.html and www.oip.gov/grants101/. 13 BJA-2015-4167 OJP strongly recommends that applicants use appropriately descriptive file names (e.g., "Program Narrative,""Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative,""Timelines," "Memoranda of Understanding,""Resumes') for all attachments. Also, OJP recommends that applicants include resumes in a single file. Failure to submit the required information will result in an application being returned in the Grants Management System (GMS) for inclusion of the missing information OR the attachment of a withholding of funds special condition at the time of award. 1. Information to Complete the Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) The SF-424 is a standard form required for use as a cover sheet for submission of pre- applications, applications, and related information. GMS takes information from the applicant's profile to populate the fields on this form. Intergovernmental Review: This funding opportunity is subject to Executive Order 12372. Applicants may find the names and addresses of their state's Single Point of Contact (SPOC) at the following web site: www.whitehouse.gov/omb/grants spoc/. Applicants whose state appears on the SPOC list must contact their state's SPOC to find out about, and comply with, the state's process under Executive Order 12372. In completing the SF-424, applicants whose state appears on the SPOC list are to make the appropriate selection in response to question 19 once the applicant has complied with their state's E.O. 12372 process. (Applicants whose state does not appear on the SPOC list are to make the appropriate selection in response to question 19 to indicate that the"Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review.") 2. Project Abstract Applications should include a high-quality project abstract that summarizes the proposed project in 400 words or less. Project abstracts should be— • Written for a general public audience and submitted as a separate attachment with "Project Abstract" as part of its file name. • Include applicant name, title of the project, a brief description of the problem to be addressed and the targeted area/population, project goals and objectives, and a description of the project strategy, any significant partnerships and anticipated outcomes. • Identify up to 5 project identifiers that would be associated with proposed project activities. The list of identifiers can be found at www.bia.qov/funding/JAGldentifiers.pdf. As a separate attachment, the project abstract will not count against the page limit for the program narrative. 3. Program Narrative Applicants must submit a program narrative that generally describes the proposed program activities for the two or four year grant period. The narrative must outline the type of programs to be funded by the JAG award and provide a brief analysis of the need for the programs. Narratives must also identify anticipated coordination efforts involving JAG and related justice funds. Certified disparate jurisdictions submitting a joint application must specify the funding distribution to each disparate unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. 14 BJA-2015-4167 A plan for collecting the data required for this solicitation's performance measures should also be included. To assist the Department with fulfilling its responsibilities under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA), Public Law 103-62, and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010, Public Law 111-352, applicants that receive funding under this solicitation must provide data that measure the results of their work done under this solicitation. Quarterly accountability metrics reports must be submitted through BJA's PMT, available at www.biaperformancetools.org. The accountability measures can be found at: www.biaperformancetools.orq/help/JAGMeasuresQuestionnaire.pdf. Submission of accountability measures data is not required for the application. Instead, applicants should discuss in their application their proposed methods for collecting data for accountability measures. Note on Project Evaluations Applicants that propose to use funds awarded through this solicitation to conduct project evaluations should be aware that certain project evaluations (such as systematic investigations designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge) may constitute "research"for purposes of applicable DOJ human subjects protection regulations. However, project evaluations that are intended only to generate internal improvements to a program or service, or are conducted only to meet OJP's performance measure data reporting requirements likely do not constitute "research."Applicants should provide sufficient information for OJP to determine whether the particular project they propose would either intentionally or unintentionally collect and/or use information in such a way that it meets the DOJ regulatory definition of research. Research, for the purposes of human subjects protections for OJP-funded programs, is defined as, "a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge" 28 C.F.R. § 46.102(d). For additional information on determining whether a proposed activity would constitute research, see the decision tree to assist applicants on the "Research and the Protection of Human Subjects" section of the OJP Funding Resource Center Web page (www.oip.gov/funding/Explore/SolicitationRequirements/EvidenceResearchEvaluationRequir ements.htm). Applicants whose proposals may involve a research or statistical component also should review the "Data Privacy and Confidentiality Requirements" section on that Web page. 4. Budget Detail Worksheet and Budget Narrative a. Budget Detail Worksheet A sample Budget Detail Worksheet can be found at www.oip.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/BudgetDetailWorksheet.pdf. Applicants that submit their budget in a different format should include the budget categories listed in the sample budget worksheet. For questions pertaining to budget and examples of allowable and unallowable costs, see the Financial Guide at www.oip.gov/financialquide/index.htm. b. Budget Narrative The budget narrative should thoroughly and clearly describe every category of expense listed in the Budget Detail Worksheet. OJP expects proposed budgets to be complete, cost effective, and allowable (e.g., reasonable, allocable, and necessary for project 15 BJA-2015-4167 activities). This narrative should include a full breakdown of administrative costs, as well as an overview of how funds will be allocated across approved JAG purpose areas. Applicants should demonstrate in their budget narratives how they will maximize cost effectiveness of grant expenditures. Budget narratives should generally describe cost effectiveness in relation to potential alternatives and the goals of the project. For example, a budget narrative should detail why planned in-person meetings are necessary, or how technology and collaboration with outside organizations could be used to reduce costs, without compromising quality. The narrative should be mathematically sound and correspond with the information and figures provided in the Budget Detail Worksheet. The narrative should explain how the applicant estimated and calculated all costs, and how they are relevant to the completion of the proposed project. The narrative may include tables for clarification purposes but need not be in a spreadsheet format. As with the Budget Detail Worksheet, the Budget Narrative should be broken down by year. c. Non-Competitive Procurement Contracts In Excess of Simplified Acquisition Threshold If an applicant proposes to make one or more non-competitive procurements of products or services, where the non-competitive procurement will exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (also known as the small purchase threshold), which is currently set at $150,000, the application should address the considerations outlined in the Financial Guide. d. Pre-Agreement Costs For information on pre-agreement costs, see"Pre-Agreement Cost Approvals" under Section B. Federal Award Information 5. Indirect Cost Rate Agreement(if applicable) Indirect costs are allowed only if the applicant has a current federally approved indirect cost rate. (This requirement does not apply to units of local government.) Attach a copy of the federally approved indirect cost rate agreement to the application. Applicants that do not have an approved rate may request one through their cognizant federal agency, which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization, or, if the applicant's accounting system permits, costs may be allocated in the direct cost categories. For the definition of Cognizant Federal Agency, see the "Glossary of Terms" in the Financial Guide. For assistance with identifying your cognizant agency, please contact the Customer Service Center at 1-800-458-0786 or at ask.ocfo cr usdo1.gov. If DOJ is the cognizant federal agency, applicants may obtain information needed to submit an indirect cost rate proposal at www.oip.gov/funding/Apply/Resources/IndirectCosts.pdf. 6. Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) Tribes, tribal organizations, or third parties proposing to provide direct services or assistance to residents on tribal lands should include in their applications a resolution, a letter, affidavit, or other documentation, as appropriate, that certifies that the applicant has the legal authority from the tribe(s) to implement the proposed project on tribal lands. In those instances when an organization or consortium of tribes applies for a grant on behalf of a tribe or multiple specific tribes, the application should include appropriate legal documentation, as described above, from all tribes that would receive services or assistance under the grant. A consortium of tribes for which existing consortium bylaws allow action 16 BJA-2015-4167 without support from all tribes in the consortium (i.e., without an authorizing resolution or comparable legal documentation from each tribal governing body) may submit, instead, a copy of its consortium bylaws with the application. Applicants unable to submit an application that includes a fully-executed (i.e., signed) copy of appropriate legal documentation, as described above, consistent with the applicable tribe's governance structure, should, at a minimum, submit an unsigned, draft version of such legal documentation as part of its application (except for cases in which, with respect to a tribal consortium applicant, consortium bylaws allow action without the support of all consortium member tribes). If selected for funding, BJA will make use of and access to funds contingent on receipt of the fully-executed legal documentation. 7. Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status Any applicants currently designated as high risk by another federal grant making agency must disclose that status. This includes any status requiring additional oversight by the federal agency due to past programmatic or financial concerns. If an applicant is designated high risk by another federal grant making agency, you must email the following information to OJPComplianceReportinq(a�usdoi.gov at the time of application submission: • The federal agency that currently designated the applicant as high risk • Date the applicant was designated high risk • The high risk point of contact name, phone number, and email address, from that federal agency • Reasons for the high risk status OJP seeks this information to ensure appropriate federal oversight of any grant award. Unlike the Excluded Parties List, this high risk information does not disqualify any organization from receiving an OJP award. However, additional grant oversight may be included, if necessary, in award documentation. 8. Additional Attachments a. Review Narrative Applicants must submit information documenting that the date the JAG application was made available for review by the governing body of the state, or to an organization designated by that governing body, not less than 30 days before the application was submitted to BJA. The attachment must also specify that an opportunity to comment was provided to citizens prior to application submission to the extent applicable law or established procedures make such opportunity available. Below are notification language templates that can be utilized in completing this section of the application. The (provide name of State/Territory) made its Fiscal Year 2015 JAG application available to the (provide name of governing body) for its review and comment on (provide date); or intends to do so on (provide date). The (provide name of State/Territory) made its Fiscal Year 2015 JAG application available to citizens for comment prior to application submission by (provide means of 17 BJA-2015-4167 notification); or the application has not yet been made available for public review/comment. b. Memorandum of Understanding (if applicable) Jurisdictions certified as disparate must identify a fiscal agent that will submit a joint application for the aggregate eligible allocation to all disparate municipalities. The joint application must determine and specify the award distribution to each unit of local government and the purposes for which the funds will be used. When beginning the JAG application process, a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that identifies which jurisdiction will serve as the applicant/fiscal agent for joint funds must be completed and signed by the Authorized Representative for each participating jurisdiction. The signed MOU must be attached to the application. For a sample MOU, go to www.bia.gov/Fundinq/JAGMOU.pdf. c. Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications Applicants are to disclose whether they have pending applications for federally funded grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding to support the same project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation. The disclosure should include both direct applications for federal funding (e.g., applications to federal agencies) and indirect applications for such funding (e.g., applications to State agencies that will subaward federal funds). OJP seeks this information to help avoid any inappropriate duplication of funding. Leveraging multiple funding sources in a complementary manner to implement comprehensive programs or projects is encouraged and is not seen as inappropriate duplication. Applicants that have pending applications as described above are to provide the following information about pending applications submitted within the last 12 months: • The federal or state funding agency • The solicitation name/project name • The point of contact information at the applicable funding agency. Federal or State Solicitation Name/Phone/E-mail for Point of Contact at Funding Agency Funding Agency Name/Project Name DOJ/COPS COPS Hiring Program Jane Doe,202/000-0000;jane.doe@usdoj.gov HHS/Substance Drug Free Communities John Doe,202/000-0000;john.doe@hhs.gov Abuse&Mental Mentoring Program/ Health Services North County Youth Administration Mentoring Program Applicants should include the table as a separate attachment, with the file name "Disclosure of Pending Applications,"to their application. Applicants that do not have pending applications as described above are to include a statement to this effect in the separate attachment page (e.g., "[Applicant Name on SF-424] does not have pending applications submitted within the last 12 months for federally funded grants or subgrants (including cooperative agreements) that include requests for funding to support the same 18 BJA-2015-4167 project being proposed under this solicitation and will cover the identical cost items outlined in the budget narrative and worksheet in the application under this solicitation."). d. Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity If a proposal involves research and/or evaluation, regardless of the proposal's other merits, in order to receive funds, the applicant must demonstrate research/evaluation independence, including appropriate safeguards to ensure research/evaluation objectivity and integrity, both in this proposal and as it may relate to the applicant's other current or prior related projects. This documentation may be included as an attachment to the application which addresses BOTH i. and ii. below. i. For purposes of this solicitation, applicants must document research and evaluation independence and integrity by including, at a minimum, one of the following two items: a. A specific assurance that the applicant has reviewed its proposal to identify any research integrity issues (including all principal investigators and sub-recipients) and it has concluded that the design, conduct, or reporting of research and evaluation funded by BJA grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts will not be biased by any personal or financial conflict of interest on the part of part of its staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients responsible for the research and evaluation or on the part of the applicant organization; OR b. A specific listing of actual or perceived conflicts of interest that the applicant has identified in relation to this proposal. These conflicts could be either personal (related to specific staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients) or organizational (related to the applicant or any subgrantee organization). Examples of potential investigator(or other personal) conflict situations may include, but are not limited to, those in which an investigator would be in a position to evaluate a spouse's work product (actual conflict), or an investigator would be in a position to evaluate the work of a former or current colleague (potential apparent conflict). With regard to potential organizational conflicts of interest, as one example, generally an organization could not be given a grant to evaluate a project if that organization had itself provided substantial prior technical assistance to that specific project or a location implementing the project (whether funded by OJP or other sources), as the organization in such an instance would appear to be evaluating the effectiveness of its own prior work. The key is whether a reasonable person understanding all of the facts would be able to have confidence that the results of any research or evaluation project are objective and reliable. Any outside personal or financial interest that casts doubt on that objectivity and reliability of an evaluation or research product is a problem and must be disclosed. ii. In addition, for purposes of this solicitation applicants must address the issue of possible mitigation of research integrity concerns by including, at a minimum, one of the following two items: a. If an applicant reasonably believes that no potential personal or organizational conflicts of interest exist, then the applicant should provide a brief narrative 19 BJA-2015-4167 explanation of how and why it reached that conclusion. Applicants MUST also include an explanation of the specific processes and procedures that the applicant will put in place to identify and eliminate (or, at the very least, mitigate) potential personal or financial conflicts of interest on the part of its staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients for this particular project, should that be necessary during the grant period. Documentation that may be helpful in this regard could include organizational codes of ethics/conduct or policies regarding organizational, personal, and financial conflicts of interest. OR b. If the applicant has identified specific personal or organizational conflicts of interest in its proposal during this review, the applicant must propose a specific and robust mitigation plan to address conflicts noted above. At a minimum, the plan must include specific processes and procedures that the applicant will put in place to eliminate (or, at the very least, mitigate) potential personal or financial conflicts of interest on the part of its staff, consultants, and/or sub-recipients for this particular project, should that be necessary during the grant period. Documentation that may be helpful in this regard could include organizational codes of ethics/conduct or policies regarding organizational, personal, and financial conflicts of interest. There is no guarantee that the plan, if any, will be accepted as proposed. Considerations in assessing research and evaluation independence and integrity will include, but are not be limited to, the adequacy of the applicant's efforts to identify factors that could affect the objectivity or integrity of the proposed staff and/or the organization in carrying out the research, development, or evaluation activity; and the adequacy of the applicant's existing or proposed remedies to control any such factors. 9. Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire In accordance with 2 CFR 200.205, Federal agencies must have in place a framework for evaluating the risks posed by applicants before they receive a Federal award. To facilitate part of this risk evaluation, all applicants (other than an individual) are to download, complete, and submit this form. 10. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities Any applicant that expends any funds for lobbying activities is to provide the detailed information requested on the form, Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL). How to Apply Applicants must submit applications through the Grants Management System (GMS), which provides cradle to grave support for the application, award, and management of awards at OJP. Applicants must register in GMS for each specific funding opportunity. Although the registration and submission deadlines are the same, OJP urges applicants to register promptly, especially if this is their first time using the system. Find complete instructions on how to register and submit an application in GMS at www.oip.gov/gmscbt/. Applicants that experience technical difficulties during this process should e-mail GMS.HelpDesk(a�usdoi.gov or call 888-549-9901 (option 3), Monday— Friday from 6:00 a.m. to midnight, Eastern Time, except federal holidays. OJP recommends that applicants register promptly to prevent delays in submitting an application package by the deadline. 20 BJA-2015-4167 Note on File Types: GMS does not accept executable file types as application attachments. These disallowed file types include, but are not limited to, the following extensions: ".com," ".bat," ".exe," ".vbs," ".cfg," ".dat," ".db," ".dbf," ".dIl," ".ini," ".log," ".ora,"".sys," and ".zip." OJP may not make a federal award to an applicant until the applicant has complied with all applicable DUNS and SAM requirements. If an applicant has not fully complied with the requirements by the time the federal awarding agency is ready to make a federal award, the federal awarding agency may determine that the applicant is not qualified to receive a federal award and use that determination as a basis for making a federal award to another applicant. All applicants should complete the following steps: 1. Acquire a Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number. In general, the Office of Management and Budget requires that all applicants (other than individuals)for federal funds include a DUNS number in their application for a new award or a supplement to an existing award. A DUNS number is a unique nine-digit sequence recognized as the universal standard for identifying and differentiating entities receiving federal funds. The identifier is used for tracking purposes and to validate address and point of contact information for federal assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. The DUNS number will be used throughout the grant life cycle. Obtaining a DUNS number is a free, one-time activity. Call Dun and Bradstreet at 866-705-5711 to obtain a DUNS number or apply online at www.dnb.com. A DUNS number is usually received within 1-2 business days. 2. Acquire registration with the System for Award Management(SAM). SAM is the repository for standard information about federal financial assistance applicants, recipients, and subrecipients. OJP requires that all applicants (other than individuals) for federal financial assistance maintain current registrations in the SAM database. Applicants must update or renew their SAM registration annually to maintain an active status. Information about SAM registration procedures can be accessed at www.sam.gov. 3. Acquire a GMS username and password. New users must create a GMS profile by selecting the "First Time User" link under the sign-in box of the GMS home page. For more information on how to register in GMS, go to www.oip.gov/qmscbt. 4. Verify the SAM (formerly CCR) registration in GMS. OJP requests that all applicants verify their SAM registration in GMS. Once logged into GMS, click the "CCR Claim" link on the left side of the default screen. Click the submit button to verify the SAM (formerly CCR) registration. 5. Search for the funding opportunity on GMS. After logging into GMS or completing the GMS profile for username and password, go to the "Funding Opportunities" link on the left side of the page. Select BJA and the FY 15 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant(JAG) Program. 6. Register by selecting the "Apply Online" button associated with the funding opportunity title. The search results from step 5 will display the funding opportunity title along with the registration and application deadlines for this funding opportunity. Select the "Apply Online" button in the "Action" column to register for this funding opportunity and create an application in the system. 21 BJA-2015-4167 7. Follow the directions in GMS to submit an application consistent with this solicitation. Once submitted, GMS will display a confirmation screen stating the submission was successful. Important: In some instances, applicants must wait for GMS approval before submitting an application. OJP urges applicants to submit the application at least 72 hours prior to the application due date. Note: Duplicate Applications If an applicant submits multiple versions of the same application, BJA will review only the most recent system-validated version submitted. See Note on "File Names and File Types" under How to Apply. Experiencing Unforeseen GMS Technical Issues Applicants that experience unforeseen GMS technical issues beyond their control that prevent them from submitting their application by the deadline must contact the GMS Help Desk or the SAM Help Desk to report the technical issue and receive a tracking number. Then the applicant must e-mail the BJA contact identified in the Contact Information section of this solicitation within 24 hours after the application deadline and request approval to submit their application. The e-mail must describe the technical difficulties and include a timeline of the applicant's submission efforts, the complete grant application, the applicant's DUNS number, and any GMS Help Desk or SAM tracking number(s). Note: BJA does not approve requests automatically. After the program office reviews the submission, and contacts the GMS Help Desk to validate the reported technical issues, OJP will inform the applicant whether the request to submit a late application has been approved or denied. If OJP determines that the applicant failed to follow all required procedures, which resulted in an untimely application submission, OJP will deny the applicant's request to submit their application. The following conditions are generally insufficient to justify late submissions: • Failure to register in SAM or GMS in sufficient time • Failure to follow GMS instructions on how to register and apply as posted on the GMS web site • Failure to follow each instruction in the OJP solicitation • Technical issues with the applicant's computer or information technology environment, including firewalls Notifications regarding known technical problems with GMS, if any, are posted at the top of the OJP funding web page at www.ojp.gov/fundinq/Explore/CurrentFundingOpportunities.htm. E. Application Review Information Review Process OJP is committed to ensuring a fair and open process for awarding grants. BJA reviews the application to make sure that the information presented is reasonable, understandable, measurable, and achievable, as well as consistent with the solicitation. BJA will also review applications to ensure statutory requirements have been met. OJP reviews applications for potential awards to evaluate the risks posed by applicants before they receive an award. This review may include but is not limited to the following: 22 BJA-2015-4167 1. Financial stability and fiscal integrity 2. Quality of management systems and ability to meet the management standards prescribed in the Financial Guide 3. History of performance 4. Reports and findings from audits 5. The applicant's ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements imposed on non-federal entities Absent explicit statutory authorization or written delegation of authority to the contrary, the Assistant Attorney General will make all final award decisions. F. Federal Award Administration Information Federal Award Notices OJP award notification will be sent from GMS. Recipients will be required to login; accept any outstanding assurances and certifications on the award; designate a financial point of contact; and review, sign, and accept the award. The award acceptance process involves physical signature of the award document by the authorized representative and the scanning of the fully- executed award document to OJP. Administrative, National Policy, and other Legal Requirements If selected for funding, in addition to implementing the funded project consistent with the agency-approved project proposal and budget, the recipient must comply with award terms and conditions, and other legal requirements, including but not limited to OMB, DOJ or other federal regulations which will be included in the award, incorporated into the award by reference, or are otherwise applicable to the award. OJP strongly encourages prospective applicants to review the information pertaining to these requirements prior to submitting an application. To assist applicants and recipients in accessing and reviewing this information, OJP has placed pertinent information on its Solicitation Requirements page of the OJP Funding Resource Center webpages. Please note in particular the following two forms, which applicants must accept in GMS prior to the receipt of any award funds, as each details legal requirements with which applicants must provide specific assurances and certifications of compliance. Applicants may view these forms in the Apply section of the OJP Funding Resource Center and are strongly encouraged to review and consider them carefully prior to making an application for OJP grant funds. • Certifications Regarding Lobbying; Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free Workplace Requirements • Standard Assurances Upon grant approval, OJP electronically transmits (via GMS) the award document to the prospective award recipient. In addition to other award information, the award document contains award terms and conditions that specify national policy requirements2 with which recipients of federal funding must comply; uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, 2 See generally2 C.F.R.200.300(provides a general description of national policy requirements typically applicable to recipients of federal awards, including the Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006(FFATA)). 23 BJA-2015-4167 and audit requirements; and program-specific terms and conditions required based on applicable program (statutory) authority or requirements set forth in OJP solicitations and program announcements, and other requirements which may be attached to appropriated funding. For example, certain efforts may call for special requirements, terms, or conditions relating to intellectual property, data/information-sharing or-access, or information security; or audit requirements, expenditures and milestones, or publications and/or press releases. OJP also may place additional terms and conditions on an award based on its risk assessment of the applicant, or for other reasons it determines necessary to fulfill the goals and objectives of the program. Prospective applicants may access and review the text of mandatory conditions OJP includes in all OJP awards, as well as the text of certain other conditions, such as administrative conditions, via OJP's Mandatory Award Terms and Conditions page of the OJP Funding Resource Center. General Information about Post-Federal Award Reporting Requirements Recipients must submit quarterly financial reports, semi-annual progress reports, final financial and progress reports, an annual audit report in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200, if applicable, and Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act (FFATA) reports through the FFATA Sub-award Reporting System (FSRS) as necessary. Future awards and fund drawdowns may be withheld if reports are delinquent. Special Reporting requirements may be required by OJP depending on the statutory, legislative or administrative requirements of the recipient or the program. G. Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s) For additional Federal Awarding Agency Contact(s), see Title Page. For additional contact information for GMS, see the Title page. H. Other Information Provide Feedback to OJP To assist OJP in improving its application and award processes, we encourage applicants to provide feedback on this solicitation, the application submission process, and/or the application review process. Provide feedback to OJ PSolicitationFeedback(a�usdoi.gov. IMPORTANT: This e-mail is for feedback and suggestions only. Replies are not sent from this mailbox. If you have specific questions on any program or technical aspect of the solicitation, you must directly contact the appropriate number or e-mail listed on the front of this solicitation document. These contacts are provided to help ensure that you can directly reach an individual who can address your specific questions in a timely manner. If you are interested in being a reviewer for other OJP grant applications, please e-mail your resume to oippeerreview(cr�lmbps.com. The OJP Solicitation Feedback email account will not forward your resume. Note: Neither you nor anyone else from your organization can be a peer reviewer in a competition in which you or your organization have submitted an application. 24 BJA-2015-4167 Application Checklist Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program: FY 2015 Local Solicitation This application checklist has been created to assist in developing an application. What an Applicant Should Do: Prior to Registering in GMS: Acquire a DUNS Number (see page 21) Acquire or renew registration with SAM (see page 21) To Register with GMS: For new users, acquire a GMS username and password* (see page 21) For existing users, check GMS username and password*to ensure account access (see page 21) Verify SAM registration in GMS (see page 21) Search for correct funding opportunity in GMS (see page 21) Select correct funding opportunity in GMS (see page 21) Register by selecting the"Apply Online" button associated with the funding opportunity title (see page 21) If experiencing technical difficulties in GMS, contact the NCJRS Response Center(see page 22) *Password Reset Notice—GMS users are reminded that while password reset capabilities exist, this function is only associated with points of contacts designated within GMS at the time the account was established. Neither OJP nor the GMS Help Desk will initiate a password reset unless requested by the authorized official or a designated point of contact associated with an award or application. General Requirements: Review Solicitation Requirements webpage in the OJP Funding Resource Center. Scope Requirement: The federal amount requested is within the allowable limit(s) of the FY 2015 JAG Allocations List as listed on BJA's JAG web page Eligibility Requirement: State/Territory listed as the legal name on the application corresponds with the eligible State/Territory listed on BJA's JAG web page What an Application Should Include: Application for Federal Assistance (SF-424) (see page 14) Project Abstract (see page 14) Program Narrative (see page 14) Budget Detail Worksheet (see page 15) Budget Narrative (see page 15) Read OJP policy and guidance on conference approval, planning, and reporting 25 BJA-2015-4167 available at www.oip.qov/financialquide/PostawardRequirements/chapter15page1.htm (see page 10) Disclosure of Lobbying Activities (SF-LLL) (if applicable) (see page 20) Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (if applicable) (see page 16) Tribal Authorizing Resolution (if applicable) (see page 16) Applicant Disclosure of High Risk Status (see page 16) Additional Attachments Review Narrative (see page 17) Strategic Plan (see page 18) Applicant Disclosure of Pending Applications (see page 18) Research and Evaluation Independence and Integrity (see page 19) Financial Management and System of Internal Controls Questionnaire (if applicable) (see page 20) 26 BJA-2015-4167 JAG 2015 Program Narrative for City of Spokane Valley, WA. JAG 2015 Grant Proposal The City of Spokane Valley respectfully submits this application for the 2015 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). The City of Spokane Valley will act as fiscal agent for the JAG. This is the sixth year the City is eligible to apply as a non-disparate single jurisdiction. The City's Grant Accountant and Senior Analyst will be responsible for grant administration details as they relate to acting as fiscal agent, to include disbursement of funds and collecting and submitting financial and performance measure reports of the JAG funding. Expenditures are tracked through individual budget lines for each federal grant received. City of Spokane Valley Projects The Spokane Valley Police Department, on behalf of the City of Spokane Valley, proposes to use their allocation of JAG funds ($19,737) for the grant program areas of law enforcement, prosecution and court. The original surveillance system of the police precinct and court building provided only views of controlled access entries and does not provide full property coverage that is typical of police and court facilities that can quickly identify potential threats. The entire award of$19,737 will be used to enhance the surveillance system and provide additional security to protect law enforcement,judges, and court personnel and this amount will be supplemented by City general fund dollars. Page 1 of 1 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant 2015 City of Spokane Valley, WA. SVJAG15 Project Project Abstract Summary: The proposed project for the City of Spokane Valley's 2015 Justice Assistance Grant in the amount of$19,737, is to enhance and upgrade the Closed Circuit Television Monitoring System for the City's Precinct Building which houses the City Police Department and District Court. Currently the surveillance system only monitors controlled entrance doors and does not have outward facing property coverage, including the parking lots and fenced areas. This upgrade would provide full coverage of the property protecting law enforcement and court personnel and members of the public that utilize the facility. The City of Spokane Valley will pay for the remaining costs of the upgrades. Goals and Objectives ❖ Protect the members of the public that visit the building. ❖ Protect police officers,judges, court security and court personnel from outside threats. ❖ Deter crime and vandalism • Provide a secure facility to process arrestees and seized property/evidence. Strategies: ❖ Increase the number of cameras and upgrade the current surveillance system to allow full coverage of the precinct and court building property. Project Identifiers ❖ Campus safety—This will enhance the campus safety for both citizens and law enforcement personnel. ❖ Court security—Spokane Valley Police Department has a District Courtroom and staff within our facility. This system will enhance the security efforts for the court. ❖ Crime Prevention—This will create a deterrent to crime directed towards this facility. ❖ Equipment—Audio/video—Our system is outdated and this upgrade will enhance our video capability. ❖ Officer safety—This system will enhance officer safety for those who use and work out of this facility. ❖ Surveillance—This will enhance our surveillance capability to monitor and record illegal activity. ❖ System Improvements—Our current system is extremely outdated and unable to meet our current needs. ❖ Terrorism preparedness—This system will allow us to monitor and/or record illegal acts conducted in and around our premises. ❖ Vandalism—SVPD has been the victim of vandalism where the security fence was cut. This system will allow us to monitor and/or record illegal acts and identify potential suspects. M y ' ,) lri : _ :. :mac: yGeneral Instructions & Resources View Budget Summary OMB APPROVAL NO.: 1121-0329 EXPIRES 7/31/2016 Budget Detail Worksheet (1) Purpose: The Budget Detail Worksheet is provided for your use in the preparation of the budget and budget narrative. All required information (including the budget narrative)must be provided. Any category of expense not applicable to your budget may be left blank. Indicate any non-federal( match) amount in the appropriate category, if applicable. (2) For each budget category, you can see a sample by clicking(To View an Example, Click Here) at the end of each description. (3) There are various hot links listed in red in the budget categories that will provide additional information via documents on the internet. (4) Record Retention: In accordance with the requirements set forth in 28 CFR Parts 66 and 70, all financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and all other records pertinent to the award shall be retained by each organization for at least three years following the closure of the audit report covering the grant period. (5) The information disclosed in this form is subject to the Freedom of Information Act under 5 U.S.C. 55.2. A. Personnel—List each position by title and name of employee,if available. Show the annual salary rate and the percentage of time to be devoted to the project. Compensation paid for employees engaged in grant activities must be consistent with that paid for similar work within the applicant organization.Include a description of the responsibilities and duties of each position in relationship to fulfilling the project goals and objectives. (Note: Use whole numbers as the percentage of time, an example is 75.50%should be shown as 75.50) To View an Example,Click Here PERSONNEL(FEDERAL) Computation Name Position Cost Salary Basis Percentage of Time Length of Time Year $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 PERSONNEL NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) PERSONNEL(NON-FEDERAL) Computation Name Position Cost Salary Basis Percentage of Time Length of Time Year $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 PERSONNEL NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL PERSONNEL $0 B. Fringe Benefits—Fringe benefits should be based on actual known costs or an approved negotiated rate by a Federal agency. If not based on an approved negotiated rate,list the composition of the fringe benefit package. Fringe benefits are for the personnel listed in budget category (A)and only for the percentage of time devoted to the project. Fringe benefits on overtime hours are limited to FICA,Workman's Compensation and Unemployment Compensation. (Note: Use decimal numbers for the fringe benefit rates, an example is 7.65%should be shown as.0765)To View an Example,Click Here FRINGE BENEFITS(FEDERAL) Computation Description T Cost Base Rate $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 FRINGE BENEFITS NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) FRINGE BENEFITS(NON-FEDERAL) Computation Description Cost Base Rate $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 FRINGE BENEFITS NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL FRINGE BENEFITS $0 C. Travel—Itemize travel expenses of staff personnel by purpose(e.g.,staff to training,field interviews,advisory group meeting,etc.).Describe the purpose of each travel expenditure in reference to the project objectives. Show the basis of computation(e.g.,six people to 3-day training at$X airfare,$X lodging,$X subsistence). In training projects,travel and meals for trainees should be listed separately. Show the number of trainees and the unit costs involved. Identify the location of travel,if known; or if unknown, indicate"location to be determined." Indicate source of Travel Policies applied Applicant or Federal Travel Regulations. Note:Travel expenses for consultants should be included in the"Contractual/Consultant"category.To View an Example,Click Here TRAVEL(FEDERAL) Purpose of Travel Location Computation Cost Item Cost Rate Basis for Quantity Number of Number of Cost Rate People Trips Lodging Night $0.00 Meals Day $0.00 Mileage Mile $0.00 Transportation: Round-trip $0.00 Local Travel $0.00 Other $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 TRAVEL NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) TRAVEL(NON-FEDERAL) Purpose of Travel Location Computation Cost Item Cost Rate Basis for Quantity Number of Number of Cost Rate People Trips Lodging Night $0.00 Meals Day $0.00 Mileage Mile $0.00 Transportation: Round-trip $0.00 Local Travel $0.00 Other $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 TRAVEL NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL TRAVEL $0 D. Equipment—List non-expendable items that are purchased(Note:Organization's own capitalization policy for classification of equipment should be used). Expendable items should be included in the"Supplies"category. Applicants should analyze the cost benefits of purchasing versus leasing equipment,especially high cost items and those subject to rapid technological advances. Rented or leased equipment costs should be listed in the"Contractual"category. Explain how the equipment is necessary for the success of the project,and describe the procurement method to be used. To View an Example,Click Here EQUIPMENT(FEDERAL) Computation Item Cost Quantity Cost Property Surveillance Cameras and System Upgrade 1 $19,737.00 $19,737 FEDERAL TOTAL $19,737 EQUIPMENT NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) The upgrade to the surveillance system would provide full coverage for the police precinct and courtroom,providing additional safety for personnel and visiting members of the public,allowing quick identification and assessment of potential threats. Twelve cameras and a digital video recorder will be added to the system and additional costs will be provided by the City. EQUIPMENT(NON-FEDERAL) . Computation Item Cost Quantity Cost $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 EQUIPMENT NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL EQUIPMENT $19,737 E. Supplies—List items by type(office supplies,postage,training materials,copying paper,and expendable equipment items costing less than$5,000,such as books, hand held tape recorders)and show the basis for computation. Generally,supplies include any materials that are expendable or consumed during the course of the project. To View an Example,Click Here SUPPLIES(FEDERAL) Computation Supply Items Cost Quantity/Duration Cost $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 SUPPLIES NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) SUPPLIES(NON-FEDERAL) Computation Supply Items Cost Quantity/Duration Cost $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 SUPPLIES NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL SUPPLIES $0 F. Construction—Provide a description of the construction project and an estimate of the costs. As a rule,construction costs are not allowable. In some cases,minor repairs or renovations may be allowable. Minor repairs and renovations should be classified in the"other"category. Consult with the program office before budgeting funds in this category. To View an Example,Click Here CONSTRUCTION(FEDERAL) Purpose Description of Work Cost FEDERAL TOTAL $0 CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) CONSTRUCTION(NON-FEDERAL) Purpose Description of Work Cost NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 CONSTRUCTION NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION $0 G. Consultants/Contracts—Indicate whether applicant's formal,written Procurement Policy or the Federal Acquisition Regulations are followed. Consultant Fees: For each consultant enter the name,if known,service to be provided,hourly or daily fee(8-hour day),and estimated time on the project.Consultant fees in excess of$450 per day or$56.25 per hour require additional justification and prior approval from OJP.To View an Example.Click Here CONSULTANT FEES(FEDERAL) Computation Name of Consultant Service Provided Cost Fee Basis Quantity 8 Hour Day $0 SUBTOTAL $0 CONSULTANT FEES NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) CONSULTANT FEES(NON-FEDERAL) Computation Name of Consultant Service Provided Cost Fee Basis Quantity • 8 Hour Day $0 SUBTOTAL $0 CONSULTANT FEES NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) Consultant Expenses: List all expenses to be paid from the grant to the individual consultants in addition to their fees(i.e.,travel,meals,lodging,etc.). This includes travel expenses for anyone who is not an employee of the applicant such as participants,volunteers,partners,etc. CONSULTANT EXPENSES(FEDERAL) Purpose of Travel Location Computation Cost Item Cost Rate Basis for Quantity Number of Number of Cost Rate People Trips Lodging Night $0.00 Meals Day $0.00 Mileage Mile $0.00 Transportation: Round-trip $0.00 Local Travel $0.00 Other $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 $0 SUBTOTAL $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 CONSULTANT EXPENSES NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) CONSULTANT EXPENSES(NON-FEDERAL) Purpose of Travel Location Computation Cost Item Cost Rate Basis for Quantity Number of Number of Cost Rate People Trips Lodging Night $0.00 Meals Day $0.00 Mileage Mile $0.00 Transportation: Round-trip $0.00 Local Travel $0.00 Other $0.00 Subtotal $0.00 $0 SUBTOTAL $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 CONSULTANT EXPENSES NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL CONSULTANTS $0 Contracts:_Provide a description of the product or service to be procured by contract and an estimate of the cost. Applicants are encouraged to promote free and open competition in awarding contracts. A separate justification must be provided for sole source contracts in excess of$100,000.A sole source contract may not be awarded to a commercial organization that is ineligible to receive a direct award. CONTRACTS(FEDERAL) Item Cost FEDERAL TOTAL $0 CONTRACTS NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) CONTRACTS(NON-FEDERAL) Item Cost NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 CONTRACTS NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL CONTRACTS $0 TOTAL CONSULTANTS/CONTRACTS $0 H. Other Costs—List items(e.g.,rent(arms-length transaction only ),reproduction,telephone,janitorial or security services,and investigative or confidential funds)by major type and the basis of the computation. For example,provide the square footage and the cost per square foot for rent or provide a monthly rental cost and how many months to rent. The basis field is a text field to describe the quantity such as square footage,months,etc. To View an Example,Click Here OTHER COSTS(FEDERAL) Computation Cost Description Quantity Basis Cost Length of Time $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 OTHER COSTS NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) OTHER COSTS(NON-FEDERAL) Computation Description Cost Quantity Basis Cost Length of Time $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 OTHER COSTS NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL OTHER COSTS $0 I. Indirect Costs—Indirect costs are allowed only if the applicant has a Federally approved indirect cost rate.A copy of the rate approval,(afully executed,negotiated agreement ),must be attached.If the applicant does not have an approved rate,one can be requested by contacting the applicant's cognizant Federal agency ,which will review all documentation and approve a rate for the applicant organization,or if the applicant's accounting system permits,costs may be allocated in the direct costs categories. (Note: Use whole numbers as the indirect rate, an example is an indirect rate of 15.73%should be shown as 15.73) To View an Example,Click Here INDIRECT COSTS(FEDERAL) Computation Description Cost Base Rate $0 FEDERAL TOTAL $0 INDIRECT COSTS NARRATIVE(FEDERAL) INDIRECT COSTS(NON-FEDERAL) Computation Description Cost Base Rate $0 NON-FEDERAL TOTAL $0 INDIRECT COSTS NARRATIVE(NON-FEDERAL) TOTAL INDIRECT COSTS $0 Budget Summary—When you have completed the budget worksheet,transfer the totals for each category to the spaces below. Compute the total direct costs and the total project costs.Indicate the amount of Federal funds requested and the amount of non-Federal funds that will support the project. Budget Category Federal Request Non-Federal Amounts Total A.Personnel $0 $0 $0 B.Fringe Benefits $0 $o $0 C.Travel $0 $0 $0 D.Equipment $19,737 $0 $19,737 E. Supplies $0 $0 $0 F.Construction $0 $0 $0 G.Consultants/Contracts $0 $0 $0 H.Other $0 $0 $0 Total Direct Costs $19,737 $0 $19,737 I. Indirect Costs $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $19,737 $0 $19,737 Federal Request $19,737 Non-Federal Amount $0 Total Project Cost $19,737 Public Reporting Burden Paperwork Reduction Act Notice: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act, a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a current valid OMB control number. We by to create forms and instructions that are accurate, can be easily understood, and which impose the least possible burden on you to provide us with information. The estimated average time to complete and file this application is four(4)hours per application. If you have comments regarding the accuracy of this estimate, or suggestions for making this form simpler,you can write the Office of Justice Programs, Office of the Chief Financial Officer, 810 Seventh Street, NW, Washington, DC 20531;and to the Public Use Reports Project, 1121-0188, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. City of Spokane Valley Budget Narrative The 2015 JAG funds will be used to enhance the City's law enforcement, prosecution and court programs by enhancing the safety and security of personnel and members of the public through the upgrade of the surveillance system at the police precinct and court building. Quotes have already been received from responsible bidders, ensuring that the best value will be received and JAG dollars maximized. The quotes were also compared to an in-house option to determine if a less expensive option was available. No overhead or administrative costs will be charged against the project and all funds will be used to purchase the equipment and associated installation. The lowest quote that provides compatible equipment is $19,824. The full JAG amount of$19,737 will be used for this project and additional costs will be covered by the City. The City will also pay for all administrative and overhead costs. All funds are expected to be expended in the years 2015 and 2016. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: June 23, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Bus Shelter Plan BACKGROUND: The Council requested an administrative report from staff explaining the City's plan for the installation of bus shelters. Staff developed a presentation recapping our current, past and future process for addressing bus shelter needs throughout the City. City staff works closely with Spokane Transit Authority (STA) to identify, fund, construct and maintain bus shelters at stops that warrant them. Currently STA has bus shelters at 26% of the stops that warrant a shelter with Spokane Valley. STA and the City historically have sought grants to assist with the implementation costs associated with installing bus shelters. Implementation Costs can include right-of-way acquisition, grading, concrete pad, retaining walls, and sidewalk and ADA improvements. Staff prioritizes these shelter locations based upon ridership, proximity to parks and schools, right-of-way requirements, estimated cost, engineering requirements, and current site use. Once priority sites are identified we work with STA to identify grants to assist with funding. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Eric Guth — Public Works Director ATTACHMENTS: Presentation 1 Bus Shelter Program City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department 21 Ove rvi ew a ., Bus shelters encourage 01° # ridership by: I - 4t _- y. .*0- ,mss, '..; Giving commuters an easy _� and comfortable experience while waiting for the bus � ', �:.. y Protecting commuters from --_- the elements e Ill . Partnership with Spokane Valley secures grants, acquires easements, designs and manages construction of _ __. ..;_--:: - ,, il i - bus shelter pads -- `' ��- -.r.,3 tee. OM ,,STA installs and maintains the a - - IP actual bus shelters � � "'� , y x� Egg Maintenance of Sh _ Maintenance is completed by riari k.A1 IV 61111 STA for the life of the shelter , including: - - . 1 ' e- 2.- - - , - - r 1- to ril - . .... ▪ Empting shelter garbage ■ L. weekly -.'`ti.. . ,.. ..0 O Pressure washing regularly itp�. A 0 g Re airin items that are Repairing vandalized 51 Recent Installations ,,,- Sidewalk Infill Project added 6 4.611,1,11111.1° , bus shelters along Sprague and Appleway in fall of 2014 4 a � � � = The City designed and managed _ �i �� the construction of the bus _. shelter pads as part of . � s ` Congestion Mitigation/Air — = � -- Quality Grant N - • STA completed the installation of the shelters and continues to maintain them 6I Selection of Bus Shelter Locations Bus stops must average greater than 25 weekday boardings : F. °'A � , a f rtY 41 as 'A ' 'r'.d` f' 23 bus stops in Spokane Valley p p : � � . qualify for new shelters q fy 1 14111 V 111 7I Selection of Bus Shelter Locations - _, �� I Wellesley y • i — t J • Liberty —y © I Egos§ Montgomery 0 4'fa = 9 o m o * ® m _•,- _ r.'1..�_..� Mission • • u a. o o ! 1 t94„,,,04 ® • !�` 1 r _0. - Broadway '^ `. 1 11111 o Legend Shelters added by Sidewalk m a Will iorojecit • i. L� -i. 1.6----- - 41%, ONO se • Var [3PotentialLocations Bus Shelter t a *. I h - •:. * a • ��---► �: 4th o Bus Stops — i 1. ii` 1r 8th • � 11.1 * Transit Shelters i Sth �"�'^ 4 STA Fixed Routes —� • T'i II fMEM RT 32 -- ` . 16th — RT 94 "S ! ! "•� _ - RT 94 E, ��+ 1111 .. RT 98 { 24th �° J- <'�^$ RT 97 w W � i _- RT 98 ! RT 178 • 32nd — —RT 174 .iii r -_ ,11•111EMEl City of Spokane Valley u,,ell bie., Spokane Transit Shelters and Bus Stops For Reference Only Subject to Revision. City of Spokane Valley 8 Selection of Bus Shelter Locations Staff ranks the 23 shelter locations based on the following criteria: Ridership ▪ Proximity to parks and schools: ▪ Right-of-way requirements ▪ Estimated Cost _-- -� ▪ Engineering requirements - + 11211,9 • Walls, grading, patch backs, etc. Ei Current site use - • Swale, parking lot, landscaping, etc. r J 'A►-, 9 Possible Future Locations North side of Sprague and EHAFAtrs Ira University No right of way required 4 1 z::•�ti; ▪ Design considerations • Excavation - • Construction of modular ~" Clear" ape�C nces �ance Center block wall required Discount CI 14415 E Sprague • Sidewalk reconfiguration • Landscaping modifications ▪ Approximate cost for bus shelter pad = $14,500 10 Possible Future / Ll EEE Sprague and Spokane Valley i 1-P a.5 Tech School ` ° Easement required 0 Design considerations r • Fairly level • Asphalt removal • Installation of bollards to yq` protect shelter from parking `"R°h�Q ��"), lot traffic F ° Approximate cost for bus shelter pad = $9,000 (not ' including easement) 11 I Possible Future Locations.., , . . Ind .„,k. %2K - ',. . ..P.!F iana at Hanson Center Light s. . �.�, { - Easement required „ �t Design considerations ff� 4jr • Tree removal • Construction of a block wall „ - ` L� .. • Reconfiguring landscaping Approximate cost for bus - .:_ shelter pad = $10,000 (not including easement) -,q±:ii Possible Future Locations „...._ � : _; South side of Sprague east of f1tfl= McDonald Easement required - ,, 0 Design considerations - W • Landscaping �o . i " = 4' - _ m-i Reconfiguration i. p • Fairly level grades • Revising curb on Xu r landscaping island ,401.° 0 Approximate cost for bus shelter pad = $10,500 (not including easement) 13 1 om arison to Other Jurisdiction• Spokane Valley currently has _ bus shelters at 26% of eligible °ante Ce ` = -' _ nter a tiF yzi - z•, bus stops ' h:. X ,s. r Spokane has bus shelters at = ~- Jle &• " 1 24% of eligible bus stops L Conclusion Spokane Valley's Bus Shelter mourommumg"104 Program works with STA to .8, identify possible locations and then ranks them based on cost --_-� CM T T and feasibility of construction .a0. - 4 e � ._. Spokane Valley staff then identifies funding opportunities ` r T - TJ ! te a when fundingbecomes available, bus shelter pads will be designed and constructed DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA For Planning Discussion Purposes Only as of June 18,2015; 8:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative To: Council& Staff From: City Clerk,by direction of City Manager Re: Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings June 30,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,June 22] ACTION ITEM: 1.Motion Consideration: Comp Plan/Overlays and Text Amendments—John Hohman (60 minutes) NON-ACTION ITEMS: 2. Historic Preservation—Gloria Mantz (20 minutes) 3. Tourism Promotion Area(TPA)—Erik Lamb (10 minutes) 4. Indigent Defense Standards—Cary Driskell (15 minutes) 5. Telecommunications Franchise,Fatbeam— Cary Driskell (15 minutes) 6.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 7. Info Only: Transportation Improvement Board(TIB) Call for Projects [*estimated meeting: 125 minutes] July 7,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,June 29] 1. Governance Manual Update —Chris Bainbridge (20 minute) 2. Transportation Improvement Board(TIB) Call for Projects— Steve Worley (15 minutes) 3. Public Works Project Updates and Progress Report—Eric Guth (15 minutes) 4. Parks&Recreation Project Updates and Progress Report—Mike Stone (15 minutes) 5. Community&Economic Development Project Updates and Progress Report—John Hohman (15 minutes) 6.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 70 minutes] July 14,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,July 6] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.First Reading Proposed Ordinance Fatbeam Franchise— Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3. Proposed Resolution Adopting Indigent Defense Standards—Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 4.Motion Consideration: TIB Call for Projects— Steve Worley (10 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Lodging Tax Update—Mark Calhoun (15 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 45 minutes] July 21,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,July 13] 1.Admission Tax—Erik Lamb (15 minutes) 2. Comp Plan Overview/Progress Report—John Hohman (90 minutes) 3.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 110 minutes] July 28,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,July 20] Presentation: Special Recognition of Eagle Scout Austin Dill—Mike Stone (5 minutes) 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second Reading Proposed Ordinance Fatbeam Franchise— Cary Driskell (10 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 4. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 25 minutes] August 4,2015—No Meeting(National Night Out) Draft Advance Agenda 6/18/2015 9:56:00 AM Page 1 of 3 August 11,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 3] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: 2016 Budget Estimated Revenues/expenditures—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) August 18,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 10] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) August 25,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 17] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2016 Budget Revenues,including Property Taxes—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes,motion to set Sept 22 Budget Hearing) (5 minutes) 3.Admin Report: Spokane County Library District Update— Sheree West and Diane Brown (15 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 5. Info Only: Dept. Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 40 minutes] September 1,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 24] 1. Outside Agency Presentations (Economic Development,& Social Service; 5 minutes each) (-90 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) September 8,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Aug 31] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Mayoral Appointment: Lodging Tax Member—Mayor Grafos (5 minutes) 3.Admin Report: City Manager Presentation of 2016 Preliminary Budget—Mike Jackson (30 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) September 15,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 7] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) September 22,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 14] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2016 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 2.First Reading Property Tax Ordinance—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: Outside Agency Grant Allocations—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: 2015 Budget Amendment—Chelsie Taylor (20 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Dept.Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 80 minutes] September 29,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 21 1.Advance Agenda October 6,2015,Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Sept 28] 1.Advance Agenda October 13,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 5]] 1. PUBLIC HEARING: 2015 Budget Amendment— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 2. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 3. Second Reading Property Tax Ordinance —Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.First Reading Ordinance Adopting 2016 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 5.First Reading Ordinance Amending 2015 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 6.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) October 20,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 12] 1. Advance Agenda (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 6/18/2015 9:56:00 AM Page 2 of 3 October 27,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 19] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Second reading Adopting 2016 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3. Second Reading Amending 2015 Budget—Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Lodging Tax Advisory Cmte (LTAC)Recommended Allocations—Mark Calhoun(25 minutes) 5.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) 6. Info Only: Dept.Monthly Reports [*estimated meeting: 55 minutes] November 3, 2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Oct 26] 1.Fee Resolution for 2016—Chelsie Taylor (15 minutes) 2.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) November 10, 2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 2] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) November 17,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 9] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) November 24,2015—no meeting (Thanksgiving week) December 1,2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 23] 1.Advance Agenda (5 minutes) December 8,2015,Formal Meeting Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Nov 30] 1. Consent Agenda(claims,payroll,minutes) (5 minutes) 2. Proposed Fee Resolution for 2106— Chelsie Taylor (10 minutes) 3.Motion Consideration: LTAC Allocations—Mark Calhoun (20 minutes) 4.Admin Report: Advance Agenda (5 minutes) December 15 2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 71 December 22,2015—no meeting December 29,2015, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 21] January 5,2016, Study Session Format,6:00 p.m. [due Mon,Dec 28] 1. Council Officer Elections for Mayor and Deputy Mayor—Chris Bainbridge (15 minutes) *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Appointments(either Dec 29 or Jan 12)— 3 PC Marijuana,Legislative Update Appointments(either Dec 29 of Jan 12)-2 LTAC Marijuana,Minor in Consumption Appts: Various Committees(Dec 29 or Jan 12) Public Safety Quarterly Costs Avista Electrical Franchise(2"d read Ord 15-011) Sidewalks and Development Clean Air Agency(Julie Oliver) SRTMC Interlocal Agreement(prior to end of year) Coal/Oil Train Environmental Impact Statement Used Oil Signage Ordinance LID(Local Improvement District) Draft Advance Agenda 6/18/2015 9:56:00 AM Page 3 of 3 Spokane Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Interim Finance Director C LT Date: June 12, 2015 Re Finance Department Activity Report— May 2015 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of May 2015 and included herein is a 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of May. 2014 Yearend Process The 2014 books were closed during April and the annual financial report was completed in May. The State Auditor's Office will be on site in June to begin the audit of 2014. 2016 Budget Development Process The 2016 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March and on April 10th we sent detailed budget requests to all departments to complete by mid-May. By the time the budget is adopted on October 27th the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including two public hearings. June 16 Council budget workshop August 11 Admin report on 2016 revenues and expenditures August 25 Public hearing #1 on 2016 revenues and expenditures September 8 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2016 Budget September 22 Public hearing #2 on 2016 Budget October 13 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2016 Budget October 27 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2016 Budget Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2015 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2015 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 17. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. P:IFinance1Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 05 31.docx Page 1 • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that are expected to be reflected in our 2014 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: o The 2015 Budget as adopted. o May 2015 activity. o Cumulative 2015 activity through May 2015. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 36.90% of the amount budgeted with 41.7% of the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are collected. • Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2015 are $5,343,873 or 47.39% of the amount budgeted. • Sales tax collections represent only 4-months of collections thus far because taxes collected in May are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of June. Collections are currently $5,626,970 or 31.92% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $129,157 or 24.14% of the amount budgeted. This is because they are paid quarterly with first quarter payments due by April 30. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2015 we have received $337,954 or 27.30% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through May we've received remittances totaling $472,537 or 26.71% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through May 2015 we've received remittances through the month of April with receipts of$509,833 or 33.83% of the amount budgeted. • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently $617,987 or 46.64% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in-season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $283,750 or 50.35% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at 37.10% of the amount budgeted with 41.7% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. Investments (page 18) Investments at May 31 total $49,312,124 and are composed of$44,239,690 in the Washington State Local Government Investment Pool and $5,072,434 in bank CDs. P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports1Council Monthly Reports1201512015 05 31.docx Page 2 Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 19) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through May and total $6,378,650 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $168,012 (2.71%) greater than the same 4-month period in 2014. Economic Indicators (pages 20 —22) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 20) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 21) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 20 provides a 10-year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $127,913 or 2.33%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2014 at $17,440,083, besting the previous record year of 2007 when $17,437,467 was collected. In terms of dollars collected this represents an increase of $2,616, but when one considers the increase in the CPI over that seven-year period plus the fact that Spokane Valley now has considerably more businesses, one could reasonably argue that our local economy is still in a recovery mode. Page 21 provides a 10-year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $8,587 or 6.65%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2014, exceeding the previous high in 2013 by $30,595 or 5.90%. Page 22 provides a 10-year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $286,626 or 90.87%. This increase is unusually high due to a state remittance of real estate excise tax of greater than $100,000 that is included in the April 2015 activity. • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and are slowly gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 23) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.O. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2015 is $7,393,971,582. Following the August 2014 refunding of the 2003 LTGO Bonds and the December 1, 2014, debt service payment the City has $6,675,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 6.02% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.20% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $5,425,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. P:IFinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 05 31.docx Page 3 o $1,250,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 24 and 25) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 24 provides a 10-year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2006. o Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $8,506 or 1.45% o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $1,878,000 in the years 2011 through 2014. • Page 25 provides a 6-year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed). o Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a "clean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor pays the tax. Tax revenues currently reported for April include only those that were received through May 31 for April returns and will be adjusted for future collections pertaining to that month. o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. o The 2015 Budget was adopted with a revenue estimate of $2,565,100. We will watch this closely as we progress through the coming months. P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 05 31.docx Page 4 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Property Tax 11,277,100 4,590,715 5,343,873 (5,933,227) 47.39% Sales Tax 17,628,400 1,462,096 5,626,970 (12,001,430) 31.92% Sales Tax-Criminal Justice 1,468,700 124,803 481,720 (986,980) 32.80% Sales Tax-Public Safety 820,100 69,004 269,960 (550,140) 32.92% Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 535,100 114,222 129,157 (405,943) 24.14% Franchise Fees/Business Registration 1,238,000 279,554 337,954 (900,047) 27.30% State Shared Revenues 1,768,900 0 472,537 (1,296,363) 26.71% Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,507,100 105,551 509,833 (997,267) 33.83% Community Development 1,325,100 118,341 617,987 (707,113) 46.64% Recreation Program Fees 563,500 55,089 283,750 (279,750) 50.35% Miscellaneous Department Revenue 95,900 8,408 47,110 (48,790) 49.12% Miscellaneous&Investment Interest 131,200 7,720 42,889 (88,311) 32.69% Transfer-in -#101 (street admin) 39,700 3,308 16,542 (23,158) 41.67% Transfer-in -#105(h/m tax-CP advertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Transfer-in -#402(storm admin) 13,400 1,117 5,583 (7,817) 41.67% Total Recurring Revenues 38,442,200 6,939,928 14,185,864 (24,256,336) 36.90% Expenditures City Council 513,114 21,544 187,681 325,433 36.58% City Manager 688,363 51,798 261,515 426,848 37.99% Legal 461,839 36,884 169,189 292,650 36.63% Public Safety 24,153,492 2,196,430 9,378,668 14,774,824 38.83% Deputy City Manager 691,303 52,149 269,503 421,800 38.98% Finance/IT 1,203,879 86,074 425,015 778,864 35.30% Human Resources 243,317 20,029 95,365 147,952 39.19% Public Works 921,914 52,520 301,108 620,806 32.66% Community Development-Administration 261,094 19,235 106,254 154,840 40.70% Community Development-Econ Dev 298,276 17,022 83,189 215,087 27.89% Community Development-Dev Svc 1,424,944 113,287 536,382 888,562 37.64% Community Development-Building 1,380,902 94,631 501,744 879,158 36.33% Parks&Rec-Administration 286,947 22,317 112,609 174,338 39.24% Parks&Rec-Maintenance 844,642 63,351 284,858 559,784 33.73% Parks&Rec-Recreation 226,174 10,869 68,156 158,018 30.13% Parks&Rec-Aquatics 496,200 1,467 9,079 487,121 1.83% Parks&Rec-Senior Center 91,985 6,719 33,936 58,049 36.89% Parks&Rec-CenterPlace 824,997 56,348 308,718 516,279 37.42% Pavement Preservation 920,000 76,667 383,333 536,667 41.67% General Government 1,741,200 50,113 457,104 1,284,096 26.25% Transfers out-#502(insurance premium) 325,000 27,083 135,417 189,583 41.67% Transfers out-#310(bond pmt>$434.6 lease pr 67,600 5,633 28,167 39,433 41.67% Transfers out-#310(city hall o&m costs) 271,700 22,642 84,933 186,767 31.26% Total Recurring Expenditures 38,338,882 3,104,811 14,221,922 24,116,960 37.10% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 103,318 3,835,117 (36,058) (139,376) Page 5 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget #001 -GENERAL FUND-continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues n/a 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Expenditures Transfers out-#309(park grant match) 100,000 8,333 41,667 58,333 41.67% General Government-IT capital replacements 145,000 0 101,807 43,193 70.21% City Manager(2 scanners) 3,000 0 0 3,000 0.00% Public Safety(const offices for unit supervisors) 25,000 0 0 25,000 0.00% Community&Econ Dev(comp plan update) 395,000 49,481 80,620 314,380 20.41% Parks&Rec(upgrade dial-up modem at pools) 10,000 0 0 10,000 0.00% Parks&Rec(replace CP lounge carpet) 8,000 0 0 8,000 0.00% Parks&Rec(CenterPlace l0yr anniversary) 7,400 0 0 7,400 0.00% Police Department-CAD/RMS 949,000 0 0 949,000 0.00% Law Enforcement Contingency 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 1,642,400 57,814 224,094 1,418,306 13.64% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (1,642,400) (57,814) (224,094) 1,418,306 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (1,539,082) 3,777,303 (260,152) 1,278,930 Beginning unrestricted fund balance 24,328,568 24,328,568 Ending unrestricted fund balance 22,789,486 24,068,416 Page 6 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 -STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 1,859,900 157,330 594,538 (1,265,362) 31.97% Investment Interest 3,000 238 889 (2,111) 29.64% Insurance Premiums&Recoveries 0 2,114 2,114 2,114 #DIV/0! Utility Tax 2,565,100 214,431 779,963 (1,785,137) 30.41% Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 0 0 (10,000) 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 4,438,000 374,113 1,377,504 (3,060,496) 31.04% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 677,297 50,377 311,864 365,433 46.05% Supplies 111,500 52,486 76,841 34,659 68.92% Services&Charges 2,122,808 330,220 544,762 1,578,046 25.66% Snow Operations 520,000 3,615 142,331 377,669 27.37% Intergovernmental Payments 748,000 8,801 131,890 616,110 17.63% Interfund Transfers-out-#001 39,700 3,308 16,542 23,158 41.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#501 (non-plow vehicle 12,077 1,006 5,032 7,045 41.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#311 (pavement preserve 206,618 17,218 86,091 120,527 41.67% Interfund Transfers-out-#502(unemployment) 0 0 38 (38) #DIV/0! Total Recurring Expenditures 4,438,000 467,031 1,315,392 3,122,608 29.64% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 0 (92,918) 62,112 62,112 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 0 300 300 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 300 300 #DIV/0! Expenditures Capital 45,000 0 0 45,000 0.00% Pavement marking grinder 8,000 0 6,019 1,981 75.23% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 53,000 0 6,019 46,981 11.36% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (53,000) 0 (5,718) 47,282 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (53,000) (92,918) 56,394 109,394 Beginning fund balance 1,705,244 1,705,244 Ending fund balance 1,652,244 1,761,638 Page 7 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #103-PATHS&TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel(Gas)Tax 7,800 664 2,508 (5,292) 32.15% Investment Interest 0 4 17 17 #DIV/0! Total revenues 7,800 668 2,524 (5,276) 32.36% Expenditures Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 7,800 668 2,524 (5,276) Beginning fund balance 29,828 29,828 Ending fund balance 37,628 32,352 #105-HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax 510,000 50,455 137,656 (372,344) 26.99% Investment Interest 300 33 137 (163) 45.81% Total revenues 510,300 50,488 137,794 (372,507) 27.00% Expenditures Interfund Transfers-#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Tourism Promotion 570,000 82,749 112,749 457,251 19.78% Total expenditures 600,000 82,749 112,749 487,251 18.79% Revenues over(under)expenditures (89,700) (32,261) 25,045 (859,758) Beginning fund balance 209,949 209,949 Ending fund balance 120,249 234,994 #106-SOLID WASTE Revenues Sunshine Administrative Fee 125,000 0 31,250 93,750 25.00% Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 125,000 0 31,250 93,750 25.00% Expenditures Professional Services 125,000 0 293 124,707 0.23% Total expenditures 125,000 0 293 124,707 0.23% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 30,957 (30,957) Beginning fund balance 7,340 7,340 Ending fund balance 7,340 38,297 Page 8 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS-continued #120-CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 8,200 542 2,187 (6,013) 26.67% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 8,200 542 2,187 (6,013) 26.67% Expenditures Operations 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 8,200 542 2,187 (6,013) Beginning fund balance 5,453,199 5,453,199 Ending fund balance 5,461,399 5,455,386 #122-WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 800 53 212 (588) 26.52% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Subtotal revenues 800 53 212 (588) 26.52% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (499,200) 53 212 (500,588) Beginning fund balance 504,020 504,020 Ending fund balance 4,820 504,232 #123-CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,300 101 455 (845) 34.96% Interfund Transfer-#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 1,300 101 455 (845) 34.96% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Transfers out-#311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 51,357 256,785 359,499 41.67% Total expenditures 616,284 51,357 256,785 359,499 41.67% Revenues over(under)expenditures (614,984) (51,256) (256,330) (360,344) Beginning fund balance 1,174,070 1,174,070 Ending fund balance 559,086 917,740 Page 9 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget DEBT SERVICE FUNDS #204-DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District 373,800 99,400 99,400 (274,400) 26.59% Interfund Transfer-in-#301 82,150 6,846 34,229 (47,921) 41.67% Interfund Transfer-in-#302 82,150 6,846 34,229 (47,921) 41.67% Total revenues 538,100 113,092 167,858 (370,242) 31.19% Expenditures Debt Service Payments-CenterPlace 373,800 99,400 61,378 312,422 16.42% Debt Service Payments-Roads 164,300 19,650 5,353 158,947 3.26% Total expenditures 538,100 119,050 66,731 471,369 12.40% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 (5,958) 101,127 (841,610) Beginning fund balance 4,049 4,049 Ending fund balance 4,049 105,176 Page 10 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 -CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 -Taxes 625,000 168,485 364,692 (260,308) 58.35% Investment Interest 1,000 105 391 (609) 39.11% Total revenues 626,000 168,590 365,083 (260,917) 58.32% Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#204 82,150 6,846 34,229 47,921 41.67% Interfund Transfer-out-#303 221,980 0 144 221,836 0.06% Interfund Transfer-out-#311 (pavement preserr 251,049 0 0 251,049 0.00% Total expenditures 555,179 6,846 34,373 520,806 6.19% Revenues over(under)expenditures 70,821 161,745 330,710 (781,723) Beginning fund balance 1,426,957 1,426,957 Ending fund balance 1,497,778 1,757,667 #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2-Taxes 625,000 68,036 237,346 (387,654) 37.98% Investment Interest 1,000 105 423 (577) 42.32% Total revenues 626,000 68,141 237,769 (388,231) 37.98% Expenditures Interfund Transfer-out-#204 82,150 6,846 34,229 47,921 41.67% Interfund Transfer-out-#303 365,290 0 21,724 343,566 5.95% Interfund Transfer-out-#311 (pavement presen 251,049 0 0 251,049 0.00% Total expenditures 698,489 6,846 55,953 642,536 8.01% Revenues over(under)expenditures (72,489) 61,295 181,816 (1,030,768) Beginning fund balance 1,325,144 1,325,144 Ending fund balance 1,252,655 1,506,960 Page 11 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 8,714,114 0 545,945 (8,168,169) 6.27% Developer Contribution 94,860 197,700 301,350 206,490 317.68% Miscellaneous 0 0 50 50 #DIV/0! Transfer-in-#301 221,980 0 144 (221,836) 0.06% Transfer-in-#302 365,290 0 21,724 (343,566) 5.95% Transfer-in-#312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 2,120,000 0 0 (2,120,000) 0.00% Transfer-in-#402 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Investment Interest 0 2 10 10 #DIV/0! Total revenues 11,516,244 197,702 869,223 (10,647,021) 7.55% Expenditures 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTC 06-31 602,196 34,232 42,543 559,653 7.06% 123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker 355,376 0 23,721 331,655 6.67% 141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC 35,052 0 3,381 31,671 9.65% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0 0 105 (105) #DIV/0! 149 Sidewalk Infill 0 3,484 7,727 (7,727) #DIV/0! 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 7,201,779 34,380 844,471 6,357,308 11.73% 156 Mansfield Ave.Connection 570,480 2,925 53,412 517,068 9.36% 159 University Rd/1-90 Overpass Study 0 0 2,075 (2,075) #DIV/0! 166 Pines Rd. (SR27)&Grace Ave. Int.Safety 556,137 3,267 42,147 513,990 7.58% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 320,560 8,800 26,322 294,238 8.21% 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 0 11,111 11,111 (11,111) #DIV/0! 191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 0 0 190 (190) #DIV/0! 196 8th Avenue-McKinnon to Fancher 0 0 396 (396) #DIV/0! 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 301,357 241 2,070 299,287 0.69% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 0 0 5,722 (5,722) #DIV/0! 206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 246,231 13,106 34,340 211,891 13.95% 207 Indiana&Evergreen Transit Access 70,014 0 0 70,014 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 151,576 0 1,251 150,325 0.83% Right of Way Acquisition 105,486 0 0 105,486 0.00% Contingency 1,000,000 0 0 1,000,000 0.00% Total expenditures 11,516,244 111,545 1,100,984 10,415,260 9.56% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 86,157 (231,761) (21,062,282) Beginning fund balance 72,930 72,930 Ending fund balance 72,930 (158,831) Page 12 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #309-PARKS CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Interfund Transfer-in-#001 100,000 8,333 41,667 (58,333) 41.67% Investment Interest 500 51 207 (293) 41.39% Total revenues 100,500 8,385 41,874 (58,626) 41.67% Expenditures 176 Appleway Trail 0 8,123 265,742 (265,742) #DIV/0! 203 Browns Park Volleyball Courts 490,650 199,578 206,215 284,435 42.03% 208 Old Mission Trailhead Parking Improvements 0 0 68 (68) #DIV/0! 212 Edgecliff Park Restroom Sewer Project 0 0 (6,923) 6,923 #DIV/0! 217 Edgecliff picnic shelter 0 0 2,454 (2,454) #DIV/0! Total expenditures 490,650 207,701 467,556 23,094 95.29% Revenues over(under)expenditures (390,150) (199,316) (425,683) (81,720) Beginning fund balance 451,720 451,720 Ending fund balance 61,570 26,037 #310-CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,200 138 555 (645) 46.29% Interfund Transfer-in-#001 339,300 28,275 141,375 (197,925) 41.67% Total revenues 340,500 28,413 141,930 (198,570) 41.68% Expenditures Land for City Hall 0 0 1,128,118 (1,128,118) #DIV/0! Engineering&Architectural Exp for City Hall 0 20,690 20,690 (20,690) #DIV/0! Total expenditures 0 20,690 1,148,808 (1,148,808) #DIV/0! Revenues over(under)expenditures 340,500 7,722 (1,006,878) 950,239 Beginning fund balance 1,919,550 1,919,550 Ending fund balance 2,260,050 912,672 Note: The fund balance includes$839,285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District does not succeed in getting a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City will repurchase this land at the original sale price of$839,285.10. Page 13 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS-continued #311 -STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2011+ Revenues Interfund Transfers in-#101 206,618 17,218 86,091 (120,527) 41.67% Interfund Transfers in-#123 616,284 51,357 256,785 (359,499) 41.67% Interfund Transfers in-#301 251,049 0 0 (251,049) 0.00% Interfund Transfers in-#302 251,049 0 0 (251,049) 0.00% Interfund Transfers in-#001 920,000 76,667 383,333 (536,667) 41.67% Grant Proceeds 971,032 0 63,508 (907,524) 6.54% Investment Interest 0 214 863 863 #DIV/0! Total revenues 3,216,032 145,456 790,580 (2,425,452) 24.58% Expenditures Pre-Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 100.00% Pavement Preservation 2,565,050 0 0 2,565,050 100.00% 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 0 0 2,718 (2,718) #DIV/0! 180 2013 Street Preservation Ph3 0 0 209 (209) #DIV/0! 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 0 0 388 (388) #DIV/0! 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 1,361 2,047 (2,047) #DIV/0! 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 0 4,047 15,109 (15,109) #DIV/0! 202 Appleway Street Preservation Project 0 0 226 (226) #DIV/0! 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 0 3,425 (3,425) #DIV/0! 218 Montgomery Ave Street Preservation 0 4,329 11,881 (11,881) #DIV/0! 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell Street Preservation 0 3,148 17,045 (17,045) #DIV/0! 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 0 739 739 (739) #DIV/0! Total expenditures 2,615,050 13,624 53,787 2,561,263 2.06% Revenues over(under)expenditures 600,982 131,832 736,793 (4,986,714) Beginning fund balance 1,922,013 1,922,013 Ending fund balance 2,522,995 2,658,806 #312-CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in-#001 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Developer Contribution 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total revenues 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Expenditures Transfers out-#303-Sullivan Rd W Bridge 2,120,000 0 0 2,120,000 0.00% Total expenditures 2,120,000 0 _ 0 2,120,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures (2,120,000) 0 0 (2,120,000) Beginning fund balance 8,581,715 8,581,715 Ending fund balance 6,461,715 8,581,715 Page 14 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402-STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,880,000 726,282 868,673 (1,011,327) 46.21% Investment Interest 1,500 155 625 (875) 41.66% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Recurring Revenues 1,881,500 726,437 869,298 (1,012,202) 46.20% Expenditures Wages/Benefits/Payroll Taxes 488,101 20,611 149,570 338,531 30.64% Supplies 15,900 23,975 24,834 (8,934) 156.19% Services&Charges 1,097,468 135,168 316,751 780,717 28.86% Intergovernmental Payments 27,000 0 14,091 12,909 52.19% InterfundTransfers-out-#001 13,400 1,117 5,583 7,817 41.67% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,641,869 180,871 510,829 1,131,040 31.11% Recurring Revenues Over(Under) Recurring Expenditures 239,631 545,566 358,469 118,838 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 0 0 212,670 212,670 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfers-in 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 212,670 212,670 #DIV/0! Expenditures Capital-various projects 600,000 0 0 600,000 0.00% VMS Trailer 16,000 0 0 16,000 0.00% 193 Effectiveness Study 0 2,446 101,666 (101,666) #DIV/0! 198 Sprague,Park to University LID 0 0 10,453 (10,453) #DIV/0! 199 Havana-Yale Diversion 0 0 4,887 (4,887) #DIV/0! 200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0 0 3,540 (3,540) #DIV/0! Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 616,000 2,446 120,546 495,454 19.57% Nonrecurring Revenues Over(Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (616,000) (2,446) 92,124 708,124 Excess(Deficit)of Total Revenues Over(Under)Total Expenditures (376,369) 543,121 450,593 826,962 Beginning working capital 1,933,564 1,933,564 Ending working capital 1,557,195 2,384,157 Page 15 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget [ENTERPRISE FUNDS-continued #403-AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 0 (500,000) 0.00% Grant DOE-Decant Facility 1,260,000 0 83,813 (1,176,187) 6.65% Grant revenue 0 4,590 568,255 568,255 #DIV/0! Total revenues 1,760,000 4,590 652,067 (1,107,933) 37.05% Expenditures 197 Broadway SD retrofit 1,200,000 12,013 24,946 1,175,054 2.08% Total expenditures 1,200,000 12,013 24,946 1,175,054 2.08% Revenues over(under)expenditures 560,000 (7,424) 627,121 (2,282,987) Beginning working capital 1,773 1,773 Ending working capital 561,773 628,894 Page 16 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA Budget Year 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures Elapsed= 41.7% For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31,2015 2015 Actual Actual thru Budget %of Budget May May 31 Remaining Budget INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 -ER&R FUND Revenues Transfer-in-#001 19,300 1,608 8,042 (11,258) 41.67% Transfer-in-#101 12,077 1,006 5,032 (7,045) 41.67% Transfer-in-#402 4,167 347 1,736 (2,431) 41.67% Investment Interest 1,000 91 369 (631) 36.89% Total revenues 36,544 3,053 15,179 (21,365) 41.54% Expenditures Vehicle Acquisitions 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Total expenditures 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Revenues over(under)expenditures 6,544 3,053 15,179 (51,365) Beginning working capital 1,235,794 1,235,794 Ending working capital 1,242,338 1,250,973 #502-RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 1 2 2 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-#001 (UE Claims) 0 0 38 38 #DIV/0! Interfund Transfer-#001 325,000 27,083 135,417 (189,583) 41.67% Total revenues 325,000 27,084 135,457 (189,543) 41.68% Expenditures Auto&Property Insurance 325,000 0 284,112 40,888 87.42% Unemployment Claims 0 429 4,631 (4,631) #DIV/0! Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! Total expenditures 325,000 429 288,743 36,257 88.84% Revenues over(under)expenditures 0 26,654 (153,286) (225,800) Beginning working capital 168,209 168,209 Ending working capital 168,209 14,923 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 64,500,020 8,856,835 20,237,078 Per revenue status report 64,500,020 8,856,835 20,23.7,078 Difference 0 0 0 Total of Expenditures for all Funds 68,660,147 4,445,823 20,010,510 Per expenditure status report 68,660,147 4,445,823 20,010,510 0 0 (0) Total Capital expenditures(included in total expenditures) 17,632,944 368,019 3,024,453 Page 17 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 6/10/2014 Investment Report For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31, 2015 Total LGIP* BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Investments Beginning $ 42,259,256.72 $ 3,069,930.19 $ 2,002,504.13 $ 47,331,691.04 Deposits 1,975,286.31 0.00 0.00 1,975,286.31 Withdrawls 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest 5,146.90 0.00 0.00 5,146.90 Ending $ 44,239,689.93 $ 3,069,930.19 $ 2,002,504.13 $ 49,312,124.25 matures: 6/28/2015 11/4/2015 rate: 0.35% 0.50% Earnings Balance Current Period Year to date Budget 001 General Fund $ 31,447,003.12 $ 3,313.56 $ 12,907.35 $ 65,000.00 101 Street Fund 2,277,861.50 237.75 889.24 3,000.00 103 Trails & Paths 40,526.46 4.23 16.61 0.00 105 Hotel/Motel 314,768.46 32.85 137.44 300.00 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 5,196,597.67 542.39 2,186.98 7,300.00 122 Winter Weather Reserve 504,062.15 52.61 212.13 700.00 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 963,175.09 100.53 454.52 1,700.00 301 Capital Projects 1,010,712.60 105.49 391.09 1,000.00 302 Special Capital Projects 1,005,606.21 104.96 423.20 1,000.00 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 22,873.86 2.39 9.64 0.00 304 Mirabeau Point Project 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 307 Capital Grants Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 309 Parks Capital Project 491,689.17 51.32 206.93 500.00 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 1,319,875.79 137.76 555.47 1,900.00 311 Street Capital Improvements 2011+ 2,050,669.97 214.04 863.03 0.00 312 Capital Reserve Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 402 Stormwater Management 1,485,007.03 155.00 624.96 2,500.00 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 876,588.93 91.49 368.91 1,000.00 502 Risk Management 5,106.24 0.53 2.15 0.00 $ 49,312,124.25 $ 5,146.90 $ 20,249.65 $ 85,900.00 *Local Government Investment Pool Page 18 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 05 31.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 6/10/2015 Sales Tax Receipts For the Five-Month Period Ended May 31, 2015 Month Difference Received 2014 2015 $ 0/0 February 1,891,031.43 1,962,820.56 71,789.13 3.80% March 1,324,975.84 1,358,307.78 33,331.94 2.52% April 1,357,736.39 1,401,618.35 43,881.96 3.23% May 1,636,894.44 1,655,903.08 19,008.64 1.16% 6,210,638.10 6,378,649.77 168,011.67 2.71% June 1,579,545.34 July 1,653,343.86 August 1,751,296.73 September 1,772,033.14 October 1,754,039.63 November 1,802,029.08 December 1,619,010.52 January 1,565,739.35 19,707,675.75 6,378,649.77 Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7%tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Crminial Justice 0.10% * - Public Safety 0.10% *— 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sales taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County,with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county-wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 19 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Sales Tax\2015\sales tax collections 2015.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/28/2015 Sales Tax Collections- April ��•:• For the years 2006 through 2015 0 2015 to 2014 Difference 2006 I 2007 2008 2009 2010 I 2011 2012 2013 2014 I 2015 $ ok January 1,572,609 1,759,531 1,729,680 1,484,350 1,491,059 1,460,548 1,589,887 1,671,269 1,677,887 1,732,299 54,412 3.24% February 1,068,743 1,155,947 1,129,765 1,098,575 963,749 990,157 1,009,389 1,133,347 1,170,640 1,197,323 26,683 2.28% March 1,072,330 1,196,575 1,219,611 1,068,811 1,018,468 1,015,762 1,067,733 1,148,486 1,201,991 1,235,252 33,261 2.77% April 1,371,030 1,479,603 1,423,459 1,134,552 1,184,137 1,284,180 1,277,621 1,358,834 1,448,539 1,462,096 13,557 0.94% Collected to date 5,084,712 5,591,656 5,502,515 4,786,288 4,657,413 4,750,647 4,944,630 5,311,936 5,499,057 5,626,970 127,913 2.33% May 1,392,111 1,353,013 1,243,259 1,098,054 1,102,523 1,187,737 1,174,962 1,320,449 1,400,956 0 June 1,362,737 1,428,868 1,386,908 1,151,772 1,123,907 1,248,218 1,290,976 1,389,802 1,462,558 0 July 1,555,124 1,579,586 1,519,846 1,309,401 1,260,873 1,332,834 1,302,706 1,424,243 1,545,052 0 August 1,405,983 1,516,324 1,377,943 1,212,531 1,211,450 1,279,500 1,299,678 1,465,563 1,575,371 0 September 1,487,155 1,546,705 1,364,963 1,227,813 1,191,558 1,294,403 1,383,123 1,466,148 1,552,736 0 October 1,526,910 1,601,038 1,344,217 1,236,493 1,269,505 1,291,217 1,358,533 1,439,321 1,594,503 0 November 1,369,940 1,443,843 1,292,327 1,155,647 1,139,058 1,217,933 1,349,580 1,362,021 1,426,254 0 December 1,366,281 1,376,434 1,129,050 1,070,245 1,141,012 1,247,920 1,323,189 1,408,134 1,383,596 0 Total Collections 16,550,953 17,437,467 16,161,028 14,248,244 14,097,299 14,850,409 15,427,377 16,587,617 17,440,083 5,626,970 Budget Estimate 16,002,000 17,466,800 17,115,800 17,860,000 14,410,000 14,210,000 14,210,000 15,250,000 16,990,000 17,628,400 Actual over(under)budg 548,953 (29,333) (954,772) (3,611,756) (312,701) 640,409 1,217,377 1,337,617 450,083 (12,001,430) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 103.43% 99.83% 94.42% 79.78% 97.83% 104.51% 108.57% 108.77% 102.65% n/a %change in annual total collected 10.02% 5.36% (7.32%) (11.84%) (1.06%) 5.34% 3.89% 7.52% 5.14% n/a %of budget collected through April 31.78% 32.01% 32.15% 26.80% 32.32% 33.43% 34.80% 34.83% 32.37% 31.92% %of actual total collected through April 30.72% 32.07% 34.05% 33.59% 33.04% 31.99% 32.05% 32.02% 31.53% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April April 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 ta April 3,000,000 -.March ■February 2,000,000 o January 1,000,000 0 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Page 20 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Lodging Tax\2015\105 hotel motel tax 2015.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/28/2015 Hotel/Motel Tax Receipts through- April Actual for the years 2006 through 2015 �� 2015 to 2014 Difference 2006 I 2007 I 2008 I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 $ % January 20,653.49 25,137.92 28,946.96 23,280.21 22,706.96 22,212.21 21,442.32 24,184.84 25,425.40 27,092.20 1,667 6.56% February 20,946.09 25,310.66 24,623.06 23,283.95 23,416.94 22,792.14 21,548.82 25,974.98 26,013.62 27,111.00 1,097 4.22% March 24,308.48 29,190.35 27,509.99 25,272.02 24,232.35 24,611.28 25,654.64 27,738.65 29,383.93 32,998.14 3,614 12.30% April 34,371.82 37,950.53 40,406.02 36,253.63 39,463.49 38,230.49 52,130.37 40,979.25 48,245.81 50,454.72 2,209 4.58% Total Collections 100,279.88 117,589.46 121,486.03 108,089.81 109,819.74 107,846.12 120,776.15 118,877.72 129,068.76 137,656.06 8,587.30 6.65% May 32,522.06 31,371.01 36,828.53 32,588.80 34,683.32 33,790.69 37,478.44 40,560.41 41,122.66 0.00 June 34,256.71 36,267.07 46,659.88 40,414.59 39,935.36 41,403.41 43,970.70 47,850.15 52,617.63 0.00 July 49,744.62 56,281.99 50,421.37 43,950.26 47,385.18 49,311.97 52,818.60 56,157.26 61,514.48 0.00 August 45,916.16 51,120.70 50,818.35 50,146.56 54,922.99 57,451.68 57,229.23 63,816.45 70,383.93 0.00 September 50,126.53 57,260.34 60,711.89 50,817.62 59,418.96 58,908.16 64,298.70 70,794.09 76,099.59 0.00 October 38,674.17 43,969.74 38,290.46 36,784.36 41,272.35 39,028.08 43,698.90 43,835.57 45,604.07 0.00 November 36,417.11 36,340.64 35,582.59 34,054.79 34,329.78 37,339.36 39,301.22 42,542.13 39,600.06 0.00 December 29,147.15 31,377.41 26,290.11 27,131.43 26,776.84 32,523.19 30,432.13 34,238.37 33,256.28 0.00 Total Collections 417,084.39 461,578.36 467,089.21 423,978.22 448,544.52 457,602.66 490,004.07 518,672.15 549,267.46 137,656.06 Budget Estimate 350,000.00 400,000.00 400,000.00 512,000.00 380,000.00 480,000.00 430,000.00 490,000.00 530,000.00 510,000.00 Actual over(under)budg 67,084.39 61,578.36 67,089.21 (88,021.78) 68,544.52 (22,397.34) 60,004.07 28,672.15 19,267.46 (372,343.94) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 119.17% 115.39% 116.77% 82.81% 118.04% 95.33% 113.95% 105.85% 103.64% n/a %change in annual total collected 7.54% 10.67% 1.19% (9.23%) 5.79% 2.02% 7.08% 5.85% 5.90% n/a %of budget collected through April 28.65% 29.40% 30.37% 21.11% 28.90% 22.47% 28.09% 24.26% 24.35% 26.99% %of actual total collected through April 24.04% 25.48% 26.01% 25.49% 24.48% 23.57% 24.65% 22.92% 23.50% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April - ---------April-- -- � 160,000.00 140,000.00 120,000.00 100,000.00 - - - t.. ''' 44 •April ,;11. ■March 80,000.00 a'$ fa 60,000.00 ■February liaM ■January 40,000.00 -' 20,000.00 - 0.00 - 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 I Page 21 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\REET\2015\301 and 302 REET for 2015.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/28/2015 1st and 2nd 1/4%REET Collections through April Actual for the years 2006 through 2015 2015 to 2014 Difference 2006 I 2007 I 2008 I 2009 I 2010 I 2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 I 2015 $ % January 243,894.16 228,896.76 145,963.47 55,281.25 59,887.08 64,128.13 46,358.75 56,898.40 61,191.55 96,140.79 34,949 57.11% February 172,154.72 129,919.79 159,503.34 45,180.53 64,121.61 36,443.36 56,114.56 155,226.07 67,048.50 103,507.94 36,459 54.38% March 182,065.71 263,834.60 133,513.35 73,306.86 86,204.41 95,879.78 71,729.67 72,171.53 81,723.70 165,867.91 84,144 102.96% April 173,796.61 211,787.08 128,366.69 81,155.83 99,507.19 79,681.38 86,537.14 90,376.91 105,448.15 236,521.17 131,073 124.30% Collected to date 771,911.20 834,438.23 567,346.85 254,924.47 309,720.29 276,132.65 260,740.12 374,672.91 315,411.90 602,037.81 286,625.91 90.87% May 306,871.66 222,677.17 158,506.43 77,463.58 109,624.89 124,691.60 111,627.22 116,164.91 198,869.74 0.00 June 226,526.64 257,477.05 178,202.98 105,020.98 105,680.28 81,579.34 124,976.28 139,112.11 106,675.77 0.00 July 2,104.30 323,945.47 217,942.98 122,530.36 84,834.48 79,629.06 101,048.69 128,921.02 208,199.38 0.00 August 451,700.06 208,039.87 133,905.93 115,829.68 72,630.27 129,472.44 106,517.19 117,149.90 172,536.46 0.00 September 188,066.23 165,287.21 131,240.36 93,862.17 75,812.10 68,019.83 63,516.73 174,070.25 152,322.59 0.00 October 211,091.20 206,442.92 355,655.60 113,960.52 93,256.02 61,396.23 238,094.79 117,805.76 123,504.75 0.00 November 141,729.09 191,805.53 147,875.00 133,264.84 72,021.24 74,752.72 104,885.99 78,324.02 172,226.74 0.00 December 161,285.23 179,567.77 96,086.00 71,365.60 38,724.50 65,077.29 74,299.65 75,429.19 117,681.62 0.00 Total distributed by Spokane County 2,461,285.61 2,589,681.22 1,986,762.13 1,088,222.20 962,304.07 960,751.16 1,185,706.66 1,321,650.07 1,567,428.95 602,037.81 Budget estimate 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 760,000.00 800,000.00 950,000.00 1,000,000.00 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00 Actual over(under)budget 461,285.61 589,681.22 (13,237.87) (911,777.80) 202,304.07 160,751.16 235,706.66 321,650.07 367,428.95 (597,962.19) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 123.06% 129.48% 99.34% 54.41% 126.62% 120.09% 124.81% 132.17% 130.62% n/a %change in annual total collected (1.19%) 5.22% (23.28%) (45.23%) (11.57%) (0.16%) 23.41% 11.47% 18.60% n/a %of budget collected through April 38.60% 41.72% 28.37% 12.75% 40.75% 34.52% 27.45% 37.47% 26.28% 50.17% %of actual total collected through April 31.36% 32.22% 28.56% 23.43% 32.19% 28.74% 21.99% 28.35% 20.12% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April April 900,000.00 800,000.00 700,000.00 - 600,000.00 - - u April 500,000.00 - 400,000.00 - '',-477,:',"-!,, March 4 ®February FF rf• ra January 300,000.00 - � ---- --- -G'`"��::�- 200,000.00 100,000.00Ill- II- 0.00 - , 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Pa.- 22 H:\Finance Activity Reports\2015\debt capacity.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 2/8/2015 Debt Capacity 2014 Assessed Value for 2015 Property Taxes 7,393,971,582 Maximum Outstanding Remaining Debt as of Debt % Capacity 12/31/2014 Capacity Utilized Voted (UTGO) 1.00% of assessed value 73,939,716 0 73,939,716 0.00% Nonvoted (LTGO) 1.50% of assessed value 110,909,574 6,675,000 104,234,574 6.02% Voted park 2.50% of assessed value 184,849,290 0 184,849,290 0.00% Voted utility 2.50% of assessed value 184,849,290 0 184,849,290 0.00% 554,547,870 6,675,000 547,872,870 1.20% 2014 LTGO Bonds Road & Period Street Ending CenterPlace Improvements Total Bonds 12/1/2014 225,000 135,000 360,000 Repaid 225,000 135,000 360,000 12/1/2015 175,000 125,000 300,000 12/1/2016 185,000 130,000 315,000 12/1/2017 190,000 130,000 320,000 12/1/2018 230,000 135,000 365,000 12/1/2019 255,000 140,000 395,000 12/1/2020 290,000 140,000 430,000 12/1/2021 320,000 145,000 465,000 12/1/2022 350,000 150,000 500,000 12/1/2023 390,000 155,000 545,000 Bonds 12/1/2024 430,000 0 430,000 Remaining -- 12/1/2025 465,000 0 465,000 12/1/2026 505,000 0 505,000 12/1/2027 395,000 0 395,000 12/1/2028 300,000 0 300,000 12/1/2029 245,000 0 245,000 12/1/2030 225,000 0 225,000 12/1/2031 180,000 0 180,000 12/1/2032 130,000 0 130,000 12/1/2033 165,000 0 165,000 5,425,000 1,250,000 6,675,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 Page 23 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT\2015\motor vehicle fuel tax collections 2015.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 5/28/2015 Motor Fuel(Gas)Tax Collections- April = For the years 2006 through 2015 2015 to 2014 Difference 2006 I 2007 2008 2009 2010 I 2011 I 2012 I 2013 I 2014 2015 $ % January 157,910 172,711 165,698 133,304 161,298 154,792 159,607 146,145 152,906 152,598 (308) (0.20%) February 145,663 162,079 149,799 155,832 145,869 146,353 135,208 145,998 148,118 145,455 (2,663) (1.80%) March 144,867 156,194 159,316 146,264 140,486 141,849 144,297 135,695 131,247 140,999 9,752 7.43% April 158,729 175,010 165,574 161,117 161,721 165,019 153,546 156,529 156,269 157,994 1,725 1.10% Collected to date 607,169 665,994 640,387 596,517 609,374 608,013 592,658 584,367 588,540 597,046 8,506 1.45% May 152,049 173,475 162,281 156,109 158,119 154,700 144,670 151,595 156,850 0 June 166,506 183,410 176,085 173,954 168,146 158,351 159,827 167,479 161,965 0 July 162,989 178,857 166,823 169,756 164,221 165,398 160,565 155,348 157,805 0 August 183,127 183,815 171,690 179,012 176,869 153,361 164,050 173,983 172,308 0 September 187,645 191,884 176,912 175,965 175,067 173,820 171,651 195,397 173,299 0 October 178,782 180,570 165,842 163,644 164,475 158,889 153,022 133,441 160,539 0 November 177,726 181,764 193,360 167,340 168,477 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 0 December 159,974 159,750 142,230 144,376 143,257 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 0 Total Collections 1,975,967 2,099,519 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 597,046 Budget Estimate 1,753,000 2,000,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,897,800 1,861,100 1,858,600 1,858,600 Actual over(under)budg 222,967 99,519 (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (50,810) 6,953 19,875 (1,261,554) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 112.72% 104.98% 92.82% 93.98% 101.47% 99.08% 97.32% 100.37% 101.07% n/a %change in annual total collected 9.57% 6.25% (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% n/a %of budget collected through April 34.64% 33.30% 29.79% 29.10% 32.07% 32.43% 31.23% 31.40% 31.67% 32.12% %of actual total collected through April 30.73% 31.72% 32.09% 30.96% 31.61% . 32.73% 32.09% 31.28% 31.33% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April April 700,000 -- 600,000 500,000 ■April 300,000 r7 March 300,000 ■February 111. 200,000 •January 100,000 - 0 , , 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Page 24 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\Telephone Tax\2015\telephone utility tax collections 2015.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 6/5/2015 Telephone Utility Tax Collections- April For the years 2009 through 2015ill 2015 to 2014 Difference 2009 I 2010 2011 I 2012 2013 2014 2015 $ % January 128,354 234,622 241,357 193,818 217,478 210,777 177,948 (6,701) (3.08%) February 282,773 266,041 230,366 261,074 216,552 205,953 212,845 (10,599) (4.89%) March 230,721 264,175 245,539 234,113 223,884 208,206 174,738 (15,678) (7.00%) April 275,775 254,984 238,561 229,565 214,618 206,038 214,431 (8,580) (4.00%) Collected to date 917,623 1,019,822 955,823 918,570 872,532 830,974 779,962 (41,558) (4.76%) May 242,115 255,056 236,985 227,469 129,270 210,010 0 June 239,334 251,880 239,013 234,542 293,668 210,289 0 July 269,631 250,593 244,191 226,118 213,078 205,651 0 August 260,408 246,261 349,669 228,789 211,929 205,645 0 September 249,380 240,111 241,476 227,042 210,602 199,193 0 October 252,388 238,500 237,111 225,735 205,559 183,767 0 November 254,819 247,848 240,246 225,319 212,947 213,454 0 December 368,775 236,065 236,449 221,883 213,097 202,077 0 Total Collections 3,054,473 2,986,136 2,980,963 2,735,467 2,562,682 2,461,060 779,962 Budget Estimate 2,500,000 2,800,000 3,000,000 3,000,000 2,900,000 2,750,000 2,565,100 Actual over(under)budg 554,473 186,136 (19,037) (264,533) (337,318) (288,940) (1,785,138) Total actual collections as a%of total budget 122.18% 106.65% 99.37% 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% n/a %change in annual total collected n/a (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) n/a %of budget collected through April 36.70% 36.42% 31.86% 30.62% 30.09% 30.22% 30.41% %of actual total collected through April 30.04% 34.15% 32.06% 33.58% 34.05% 33.76% n/a Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of April 1,200,000 April ®April 1,000,000 _ -- March I - i ■February 800,000 V c:',-f•.:' - 1 . 4 = a January 1 1 , 600,000 --- I : 400,000 200,000 0 , , , , , , , 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Page 25 City of Spokane Valley [rl}�N Sp�kan' +e ` �Ua�ley Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre-Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 06/03/2015 10:51 Page 1 of 11 Community Development SO lane ;Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Pre-Application Meetings Requested A Pre-Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community Development scheduled a total of 8 Pre-Application Meetings in May 2015. 15 10 5 ill" _ ....,10 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre-Application = Commercial Pre-App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre-App 6 10 12 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Land Use Pre-Application Meeting 4 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 10 11 14 9 8 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 52 Printed 06/03/2015 10:51 Page 2 of 11 Community Development Spokane '' Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Online Applications Received Community Development received a total of 143 Online Applications in May 2015. r 150 100 50 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec illl Trade Permit Right of Way Permit I=1 Reroof Permit Demolition Permit In Approach Permit Sign Permit Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Approach Permit 1 1 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition Permit 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reroof Permit 7 13 20 22 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right of Way Permit 30 37 27 53 49 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Permit 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Trade Permit 59 54 65 64 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 97 108 115 145 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 608 Printed 06/03/2015 10:51 Page 3 of 11 Community Development rl}�N [Sp0kaflC Valley Monthly Report 40010 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Construction Applications Received Community Development received a total of 410 Construction Applications in May 2015. 600 M 400 200 11111111 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial -New i' Commercial-TI Residential-New Ell Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New li 3 3 51 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 14 12 24 14 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-New 8 11 22 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade *23 *23 *26 *18 *30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade *86 *83 *146 *121 *122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 10 5 14 7 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 1 *4 7 *4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign 11 *9 11 *13 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits *97 *131 *169 *269 *197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 253 281 470 465 410 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 1,879 *Includes Online Applications. Printed 06/03/2015 10:53 Page 4 of 11 Community Development },N Spokane Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Land Use Applications Received Community Development received a total of 42 Land Use Applications in May 2015. r 100 50 11111111 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment = Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Polity Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 1 5 3 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 0 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 50 51 79 48 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 54 58 89 60 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 303 Printed 06/03/2015 10:53 Page 5 of 11 Community Development SO lane Valley. Monthly Report 40010 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Construction Permits Issued Community Development issued a total of 376 Construction Permits in May 2015. r 600 400 200 611111111 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New I Commercial-TI Residential-New = Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial-New 2 3 22 33 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-TI 12 12 23 14 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential- New 6 14 13 22 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Commercial-Trade 24 20 23 19 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Trade 80 92 120 133 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Residential-Accessory 10 5 14 6 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Demolition 0 4 7 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign 11 9 11 11 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Construction Permits 68 99 127 159 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 213 258 360 401 376 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 1,608 Printed 06/03/2015 10:54 Page 6 of 11 Community Development N Sp0kaflC Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Land Use Applications Approved Community Development approved a total of 42 Land Use Applications in May 2015. r 60 40 20 N ill" i 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment I= Binding Site Plan Preliminary State Environmental Policy Short Plat Preliminary Final Platting Act(SEPA) Long Plat Preliminary Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment Administrative Exception/Interpretation = Other Land Use Permits . Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Boundary Line Adjustment 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Short Plat Preliminary 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Plat Preliminary 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Binding Site Plan Preliminary 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Final Platting 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 State Environmental Policy Act(SEPA) 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Administrative 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits 38 52 51 41 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 43 52 56 44 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Annual Total To-Date: 237 Printed 06/03/2015 10:54 Page 7 of 11 Community Development [lel , Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Development Inspections Performed Community Development performed a total of 1416 Development Inspections in May 2015. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 1,600 1,400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2013 2014 -- 2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2015 801 974 1,063 1,242 1,416 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2014 601 633 996 1,281 1,321 1,295 1,413 1,225 1,310 1,481 973 1,026 2013 465 503 808 1,026 1,060 1,015 1,084 1,078 1,186 1,016 833 673- Printed 06/03/2015 10:56 Page 8 of 11 Community Development Siiiikane Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Code Enforcement Code Enforcement Officers responded to 36 citizen requests in the month of May. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 40 20 1111(1110 i 0 - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non-Violation Environmental k _d General Nuisance = Property Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint,Non-Violation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Environmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 General 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Nuisance 10 18 26 22 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Property 10 7 5 12 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Monthly Totals 23 26 32 35 36 0 flog ? Annual Total To-Date: 152 Printed 06/03/2015 10:56 Page 9 of 11 Community Development Valley Monthly Report 4000 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Revenue Community Development Revenue totaled $123,918 in May 2015. 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 2014 - Five-Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2015 $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $655,394 Trend $79,763 $67,972 $133,730 $131,195 $224,961 $199,161 $138,904 $100,987 $134,164 $109,327 $91,979 $67,777 $1,479,920 2014 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046 2013 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 2012 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $1,552,558 2011 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 $1,083,255 2010 $87,229 $84,626 $109,029 $96,800 $305,185 $102,781 $87,805 $87,724 $107,002 $73,100 $72,948 $64,009 $1,278,238 Printed 06/03/2015 10:57 Page 10 of 11 Community Development Valley Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 05/31/2015 Building Permit Valuation Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $6,708,276 in May 2015. 35,000,000 30,000,000 25,000,000 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -9- 2015 2014 - Five-Year Trend -f Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 2015 $2.93M $10.71M $8.07M $18.60M $6.71M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M $0.00M I $47.02M Trend $7.58M $3.92M $6.13M $6.87M $23.25M $18.45M $11.28M $6.65M $10.77M $7.63M $4.10M $2.93M I $109.55M 2014 $3.18M $2.45M $9.90M $8.92M $34.58M $7.44M $6.37M $9.47M $12.01M $7.70M $3.59M $6.30M I $111.91M 2013 $25.49M $1.92M $3.59M $7.30M $22.22M $41.88M $32.91M $6.52M $8.11M $14.22M $7.25M $2.54M I$173.95M 2012 $0.72M $2.95M $5.29M $5.32M $24.39M $33.08M $7.91M $9.89M $6.47M $8.78M $3.76M $1.66M I$110.22M 2011 $1.46M $5.95M $5.03M $6.15M $2.53M $4.98M $3.83M $3.45M $21.54M $4.46M $3.97M $1.85M $65.20M 2010 $7.06M $6.34M $6.82M $6.64M $32.55M $4.86M $5.36M $3.91M $5.71M $3.01M $1.93M $2.29M[ $86.48M Printed 06/03/2015 10:57 Page 11 of 11 CITY •OF PARKS AND RECREATION. Spokane FIRST QUARTER REPORT �jValley JANUARY—MARCH 2015 ADMINISTRATION AND PARKS: ‘44_4:4 \. • • A new piece of public art donated to the people of _ w+` Spokane Valley by the Spokane Valley Arts Council was dedicated on March 26. The art is a 16-foot tall bronze r entitled "Dance of Sun and Moon." This is the second11,?" 0, 0 t. sculpture from Colville artist, Dr. Jerry McKellar, to be placed in Mirabeau Point Park. s • Contracts completed in the first quarter include: o Renewed the Park Maintenance Services contract for another year. o CenterPlace Food Services with Cobblestone Catering & Events LLC. o Professional Services for the CenterPlace Roof Repair Project. o Construction Agreement for the Precinct Exterior Paint Project. o Agreement for Operation and Maintenance of Pool Facilities. o Professional Services for the Edgecliff Park Shelter Phase II Project. o Janitorial Services for the Police Precinct. o Construction Agreement for the Precinct Gate Motor Replacement Project. o Construction Agreement for the CenterPlace Lounge Electrical Project. o Construction Agreements for Phases I and II for the Browns Park Volleyball Courts. • Staff was involved in providing input for the development of the draft Procurement Manual. • A formal bid for the Valley Mission Park Pool Tank Painting Project was issued. • Staff worked on updating the Business Plan. • Met with consultants to begin discussion for a Pocket Dog Park at Valley Mission Park. • Continued to work with an Eagle Scout on the basketball court project at Browns Park. • Both Administrative and Recreation staff presented the Browns Park Sand Volleyball Courts Project to EWU Recreation students to see if they could research possible grant opportunities as part of a school assignment. t • Staff worked with Recreation on the Browns Park Sand Volleyball Complex design and for the Lodging Tax Grant. • Continued to meet monthly with other jurisdictions regarding Centennial Trail maintenance. }` • • A public meeting was held regarding improvements to the Old Mission Trailhead located by the River House Apartments and as part of the Indiana Avenue t:_ extension between Sullivan and r I ' . ti. , iin'! Flora. Information gathered at �• ■r,t =�� >4 1 5. ■I. ' the meeting will be used to help "�;. ! :� ,,; 1H, develop a plan for installation of F • the selected enhancements. 4a �` , 1 CENTERPLACE: • Staff took 255 CenterPlace reservations during the first quarter of 2015. 4* j • CenterPlace was awarded $17,000 from the Lodging Tax Committee. The money will be used to partner with Visit ' 77. _ ,... Spokane to meet with meeting planners at various trade ,, _ • � shows and conferences in order to bring regional conferences to CenterPlace and other Spokane Valley . P • facilities. In conjunction with this project, staff has already r ..f- attended a Meeting Planner Conference along with a Visit �° Spokane Representative which was held in Grand Mound, • "' ,. Washington in early March. .,1 • Tina Gregerson was hired to fill the Office Assistant I , position, which was open at the CenterPlace reception desk. '� Tina brings with her marketing and customer service skills as well as knowledge of our department, as she has worked as a Host for CenterPlace for over seven years. ;47-7) t -a • Staff attended the largest Bridal Fair in the area at the Spokane Convention Center January 10 and 11. There were over 1200 people that attended the event with 800 of them being brides. CenterPlace 4N, k booked 15 weddings the week after the bridal fair. • CenterPlace hosted and participated in the Inland Northwest Professional Resource Organization's (INPRO) first annual `Wedding Tour and Show" in January, in which 100 people attended. This Tour is an opportunity for the wedding couple to visit and view event facilities and their locations and services. Several wedding and honeymoon related vendors were set up offering their services. • A difficult decision was made to not exercise the final option year of Red Rock Catering's contract and renew it for 2015. We awarded an interim contract to Cobblestone Catering and Events in order to cover events that were booked in 2015 with little to no disruption. This will give us the time needed to put together an RFP and select a caterer that best fits the needs of our organization. Cobblestone Catering is co-owned by Jason Hoy, award winning executive chef. Staff worked with Red Rock and all +' groups to get food deposits returned and with Cobblestone to geti'',k new contracts signed. The transition ., tr , i I to our new catering company has lir - ," been smooth and no booked events .- "I I . ~ �" ;� A am were lost during the process. F qYla {1{ 2 RECREATION AND AQUATICS: 3:,, • Summer Day Camp and Park Program planning began. Summer P.,..•k.�.,,..t�...,...t programs begin June 15. This work included such tasks as updating job descriptions for summer recreation seasonal positions and interviewing -�� , candidates. A new comprehensive Summer Day Camp and Park , r 1 ( �_ Program staff manual and Summer Day Camp Parent Information ; Packet was prepared. Completed the ordering of Summer Staff and (.4 s , , Camper T-shirts. ,-v.i tON • • Aquatics planning included the development of a new complete Aquatics " 41,4, t ,t informational brochure. Swim Lesson and Swim Request forms for the upcoming summer were mailed out to local day cares and child care ,L,I,_: �, ;I, providers. The City webpage was updated with current forms and "3ow.a, information on all summer programs and events. �> �� zR,A, ( • Summer Outdoor Movie planning also began in January. Public outdoor a: . ti: "3'43 movie voting was completed in February. The winners of the movie ;,,.,,`L`;,,,, k;; ,, , ;;;,,;, voting were "Paddington," to be shown on July 24, and "Big Hero 6," to ' be shown on August 21. Confirmed the onsite veterinarian for the Aug. 23 and 24 Paws in the �' Da By: oef Sunandlaoon '�\ • 9 By:Jerry McKellar 1 Pool Dog Swim event at Valley Mission Pool. Cheney Vet Clinic is happy to volunteer their services for the second year in a row. • Coordinated with East Valley School District to confirm and finalize our meal program sites for this summer (Terrace View Park breakfast and lunch, Valley Mission Park breakfast and lunch, and Edgecliff Park t., lunch). • Designed, printed and distributed the Summer/Spring Recreation Brochure which included confirming class schedules with instructors 1 and updating and renewing Instructor contracts. Also compiled a bulk mailing list of all past program participants for direct mailing and gotSpoknt ,' I ;53 jNttlle, �— approval from Central Valley, West Valley and East Valley School `� Districts for brochure distribution to elementary school students. , . • Staff worked with Evergreen Region Volleyball Association to submit — :. -� ' an application and present a grant request to fund additional sand �• • volleyball courts at Browns Park to the Spokane Valley Lodging Tax v. i'v Committee for their consideration. We were very fortunate to receive City ofSpokaneValley • $68,000 to go towards the construction of seven new sand volleyball Parks&ReoreationDepartm courts to be completed by May of this year. A Q U AT I. • Partnered with Eastern Washington University's Physical Education, 2015 Information Guide Health and Recreation Assistant Professor Jeremy Schultz, PhD, to create a research project for his Recreation Budgeting class students on locating grant and funding opportunities for the Browns Park Volleyball Complex. PARK ROAD • Assisted with the Kiwanis Father/Daughter Dance registration and • TERRACE VIEW ticket distribution. This event was held at CenterPlace with close to " • VALLEY MISSION 500 people in attendance. « •i • • Participated along with Mayor Grafos, Councilmember Hafner, and �' • other City staff in a presentation to St. John Vianney's second grade • AL e;�,;;',,�� Parks&Recreation Department class field trip to Spokane Valley City Hall in March. Our presentation 509 cm 0300 .000 Valle). vomicealy.mig291, was on what the Parks and Recreation Department does for the City and for the Community. 3 SENIOR CENTER: p • The Spokane Valley Senior Citizens Association lir " . ' (SVSCA) created its own website for the .; newsletter and calendar of events. The website s f �� is: www.spokanevalleyseniorcenter.org. The .. printed newsletter is available five times a year. ,, 1 _t e il • Wii Bowlers from the Senior Center won First Place f t again in the tournament at Valley Nazarene Church. 3 0 i- - There were 30 teams of seniors throughout the - Spokane and Spokane Valley area who competed. Needless to say, "Wii" are so proud of our seniors team! - 1 ! :. • Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern WA/SHIBA 7., =. (Senior Health Insurance Benefit Advisors) continues to ==. � �,� = have volunteers available at the Center to hel eo le - .:., ,. - . .' tpp P /fit . choose the most appropriate Medicare Plan for their ==••i - individual needs. _ wll,0;, • The ACT 2 classes are increasing in participation regularly from aerobic exercise to five different art I - s. is fir°;.: classes. =¢ ' 1. , • The knitting and crochet classes have steadily increased -� ' i• ,,: with a fairly constant attendance of 20 each Monday ` _ ,. afternoon. 5 �-° • New line dance classes began Tuesday evenings with , ' very good attendance. ) '-, • The Senior Center remains one of the first contacts for people who are looking for information for services and/ 11 or assistance. The requests range from help with their ` ' I" e • 1 , rd energybill to new housingoptions and what other .,� f services are available for seniors in our area. Members 1 ( 1 f - k a come from as far away as Clarkston, WA and several ;" I . from the Post Falls and Coeur d'Alene areas. s ?, Numbers That Count... January February March Total Attendance 3,111 3,048 3,541 Billiards Room Participants 516 502 492 Pickleball Participants 527 502 573 4 Rick VanLeuven Ozzie Knezovich Chief of Police Sheriff Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 g AN Air IF1 ,P3 T.,atiiiiivrik_ _ .w , Services provided in partnership with GtINC °;s the Spokane County Sheriff's Office and the Community, Dedicated to Your Safety. TO: Mike Jackson, City Manager FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: June 15, 2015 RE: Monthly Report May 2015 May 2015: May 2014: CAD incidents: 5,079 CAD incidents: 5,268 Reports taken: 1,816 Reports taken: 1,770 Traffic stops: 848 Traffic stops: 1,151 Traffic reports: 269 Traffic reports: 268 CAD incidents indicate calls for service as well as self-initiated officer contacts. Hot spot maps are attached showing May residential burglaries, traffic collisions, vehicle prowlings, and stolen vehicles. Also attached are trend-line graphs for 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015: Citations, Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls, Self-Initiated Calls, Collisions, Persons Crimes, Property Crimes, and Sex Crimes. Also included is the May Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects incidents that occurred in a specific city to which a deputy from Spokane County took the courtesy report. For example, an individual may have had his car stolen in Airway Heights, and he waited until he returned home in the Newman Lake area to make a report. In 2011, we switched from UCR to NIBRS classification. As a result, certain crimes were broken down to their violation parts for NIBRS and each part is now counted. Consequently, comparing certain crimes before 2011 to crimes during or after 2011 is not recommended using the graphs. The crimes that are impacted by the NIBRS classification changes that should not be compared to prior graphs include: Adult Rape, Assault, Forgery and Theft. Page 1 ADMINISTRATIVE: The month started with the Annual Law Enforcement Appreciation Breakfast at Faith Bible Church, hosted by the Sheriff's Chaplain's Office. Later in the morning, Chief VanLeuven attended the 28th Annual Memorial Service for Law Enforcement at the Courthouse Courtyard. Chief VanLeuven attended the Basic Law Enforcement Academy (BLEA) Class #713 Graduation Ceremony at Spokane Community College. The Spokane County Sheriff's Office congratulated graduates Nathan Booth, Drew Jones, Brandon Pacheco, Joseph Wallace, Dallas Marcus, Travis West, and Francine Callan on becoming deputies. Chief VanLeuven gave opening remarks at the Northwest Gang Investigators Association Annual Conference held at Northern Quest. The conference covers a wide range of criminal gangs, taught by recognized experts in the field of street gangs and related topics. The third week of May brought the Annual Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs (WASPC) Conference, held in Spokane at the Convention Center. Chief VanLeuven and Sheriff Knezovich attended the event. The Accreditation Commission, of which Chief VanLeuven is a member, met during the conference to consider a handful of law enforcement agencies to become accredited. In that same vein, the Spokane Valley Police Department is fervently working on our reaccreditation, which should take place later this year. Spokane Valley Police have been accredited since 2011; reaccreditation takes place every four years. Chief VanLeuven travelled to Washington D.C. at the end of May along with Detention Services Captain John McGrath, Spokane Police Chief Frank Straub, Spokane County Prosecutor Larry Haskell, Public Defender Tom Krzyminski, Judge Mary Ann Moreno, and WSU's Jackie VanWormer. All attended the Safety and Justice Challenge Symposium, the MacArthur Foundation's major new initiative to reduce over-incarceration by changing the way America thinks about and uses jails. The event was presented by the MacArthur Foundation and co-hosted by the Pretrial Justice Institute. SHERIFF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (SCOPE): In the month of May, S.C.O.P.E. participated in: • Spokane Valley "City Hall at the Mall" • GoodGuides Mentoring WVHS • Law Enforcement Appreciation Breakfast • "Walking School Bus" Seth Woodard • Law Enforcement Memorial Elementary • S.C.O.P.E. East Parade • Security Awareness Training • "Build a Bike" Golden States Foundation • East Valley Community Coalition Mtg. • LDS Cub Scout Bike Rodeo • Crime Stoppers Mtg. • S.C.R.A.P.S. Press Conference • GSSAC Coalition Mtg. • Opportunity Elementary Bike Safety • Operation Family ID Training Page 2 May 2015 Volunteers Hours per Station *Includes estimated volunteer service hours that are provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover both Spokane Valley and the unincorporated portion of the county. Location #Volunteers Admin Hours L.E. Hours Total Hours Central Valley 11 286.5 82.0 368.5 East Valley* 21 256.5 232.5 489.0 Edgecliff 25 647.0 62.0 709.0 Trentwood 4 168.0 100 268.0 University 19 470.0 306.5 776.5 West Valley* 24 724.0 10.0 734.0 TOTALS 104 2,552.0 793.0 3,345.0 Volunteer Value ($21.62 per hour) $72,318.90 for May 2015 Spokane Valley Graffiti Report 2012 2013 2014 2015 Jan. 0 2 3 5 Feb. 0 7 16 8 March 2 13 11 7 April 14 9 30 14 May 16 4 4 10 June 15 9 13 July 41 7 12 Aug. 57 22 6 Sept. 26 4 12 Oct. 30 7 6 Nov. 19 7 2 Dec. 37 1 7 Total 257 92 97 34 S.C.O.P.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 246 on-scene hours (including travel time) in May, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control. Of those hours, 81 hours were for incidents inside Spokane Valley. There were no Special Events in Spokane Valley in May. Total May volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, response and special events is 546; year-to-date total is 2,431 hours. Abandoned vehicles tagged by S.C.O.P.E. volunteers for impoundment in Spokane Valley in April totaled 12 and in May 8 with 5 vehicles in April and 3 in May, respectively, eventually cited and towed. Five hulks were processed in April and 15 hulks processed in May. During the month of May, a total of 43 vehicles were processed; the total for 2015 to date is 287. Page 3 SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS TRAINING HOURS SCSO SVPD TOTAL January 0 18 48 66 February 0 26 42 68 March 0 22 43 65 April 0 30 27 57 May 0 15 51 66 YTD - TOTAL 0 111 211 322 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valley # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of # of Non - Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 February 2 10 2 0 0 March 3 24 1 0 0 April 2 22 1 0 0 May 2 45 2 0 0 YTD Total 9 101 7 0 0 Spokane County # of #of Hrs #of Disabled #of # of Non - Vol. Infractions Warnings Disabled Issued Issued Infractions Issued January 3 16.5 0 0 0 February 6 26.5 1 0 0 March 7 54 2 0 0 April 3 39 10 0 0 May 2 13 0 0 0 YTD Total 21 149 13 0 0 OPERATIONS: Walmart Shoplifter Caught — On an evening in mid-May 2015, Spokane Valley Sheriff Deputies were called to Walmart located at 15727 E. Broadway, regarding shoplifters who were leaving the store in a black Monte Carlo with an Idaho license plate. The loss prevention officer provided a description of the 25-year-old white male suspect as well as the 26-year-old female suspect who was driving a Monte Carlo. Deputy Sciortino arrived in the area and located the Monte Carlo as it traveled north on Sullivan, stopping the vehicle at Wellesley. He contacted the female driver and male passenger, and also observed two small children in the back seat, a toddler and an infant. Deputy Bohanek responded to Walmart and viewed the surveillance footage with the loss prevention officer. Deputy Bohanek observed an adult female wearing a pink tank top-type shirt exit the store with a shopping cart full of items that were not in bags; she also had a young child with her. He Page 4 conveyed the female suspect description to Deputy Bohanek who confirmed the female occupant in the vehicle matched that description. Deputy Bohanek then responded to Sullivan and Wellesley. The female suspect was cooperative and agreed to a search of the vehicle. The trunk was full of brand new merchandise, similar to what he had observed in the female's cart as it left the store. The female suspect admitted that she had taken all the items from Walmart without paying for them. In a further search of the vehicle, Deputy Sciortino located a syringe and black in color tar/liquid substance that field tested as heroin. The male admitted the heroin belonged to him; however, he stated he had no part in the theft at Walmart. Deputy Bohanek cited and released the female for Driving While License Suspended 3rd Degree and Theft 3rd Degree. When returning all the items located in the trunk to Walmart, it was determined that the value was $808.72, which would constitute a felony charge instead of the Theft 3rd, which is a misdemeanor. Charges were amended for Theft 2nd Degree, due to the items exceeding $750. The male suspect was obviously under the influence of heroin and admitted he would be getting "heroin sick" if taken to jail. A probable cause affidavit was forwarded to the Prosecutor's Office for Possession of Controlled Substance/Heroin. A relative of the female suspect's responded to the scene and took custody of the children. Pedestrian Infraction Leads to Heroin and More — In mid-May, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies Bohanek and McQuitty observed a 39-year-old male and 31-year-old female walking westbound in the roadway at about 19100 E. Boone Avenue; they were not walking so that they were facing on-coming traffic, which is a pedestrian violation. Deputy Bohanek recognized the female from a prior suspicious vehicle contact in April, at which time she identified herself as "Christie," (later determined to be her sister's name). During the earlier contact, Deputy Thurman had developed probable cause to arrest the female for possession of a controlled substance. In that incident, the female claimed to be having a seizure and was transported to Valley Hospital, from where she fled, avoiding arrest. At this incident, neither individual had identification in their possession and the female denied she was "Christie." When reminded of the earlier contact, she became agitated. She was told she was being arrested for Deputy Thurman's probable cause and as Deputy Bohanek was handcuffing her, she continued reaching for her left pocket on her jacket. When the female suspect's hand was removed from her pocket, Deputy Bohanek observed her clutching a plastic grocery bag containing several bulky items to include a clear plastic baggie containing a large quantity of a brown tar-like substance, later field tested positive for heroin. The female suspect was advised she was being arrested for Resisting Arrest and Possession of Controlled Substance/Heroin as well as Deputy Thurman's charge of Possession of Controlled Substance. During a search incident to arrest, Deputy Bohanek located several hypodermic syringes in the right outer pocket of the jacket along with a credit card in her purse; there were no other identifying cards in the purse. After confirming there were no outstanding warrants on the male suspect, he was released from the scene. While transporting the female suspect to the jail, Deputy Bohanek asked about the credit card and the female stated that she had been with the female whose name was on the card. A check of the female suspect's name showed her wanted on an outstanding felony warrant for Possession of a Controlled Substance in Spokane Superior Court. In an attempt to confirm the female suspect's identity, he obtained photos from the driver's license of the female suspect "Christie" and the name on the credit card found on the suspect. It was determined that the female suspect was actually the individual who was named on the credit card and she had been using her sister's name. A call to the real "Christie," who lives in Wyoming, confirmed she had not travelled to Spokane since June of 2014. The sister said she had been worried lately that the female suspect was again using her identity, although she didn't want to pursue charges against her sister. The heroin was weighed prior to placing it onto property; weight was 29.8 grams, well in excess of what would be considered a"user quantity." Page 5 Juvenile Cell Phone Theft — On a morning in mid-May, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to the 10100 block of East 4th Avenue for a call regarding stolen property. The mother of a 14-year-old male told Deputy Tom Walker that her son had been stealing things from the house, school, and Winco. She said she found a cell phone that was missing from an old roommate who had moved out around the 1st of May. She also said her son had stolen some other cell phone so he could view pornography on them. She was able to reach the former roommate by telephone and Deputy Walker spoke with him regarding the stolen cell phone; he wished to pursue charges. The male suspect's mother also advised Deputy Walker that the male had gotten into trouble at school for stealing approximately 100 books from the library. She further advised that her son had participated in a diversion program due to a Winco theft charge, which she felt was a joke. She was very upset that the court did not do anything to these kids and felt they continued to commit crimes expecting no repercussions. Deputy Walker contacted the young male suspect who said he stole all these things because he just wanted to play with them and get on line. The youth and his mother were advised that charges would be forwarded to Juvenile Court for Theft and Possession of Stolen Property. The former roommate's phone was located and returned. Suspicious Vehicle Nets Drugs — In the evening hours in mid-May, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to a suspicious vehicle call near East 27th Avenue and South Skipworth, where occupants of other vehicles were getting out and approaching the suspicious vehicle, leading him to believe there was drug activity taking place. The complainant also advised there was a white pickup with a male and female present. Upon Deputy Eaton's arrival, he observed the white Toyota pickup truck parked on 27th, just west of Skipworth, as well as a black Dodge Nitro in front of the pickup. As Deputy Eaton approached the vehicles, a 37-year-old male exited the front passenger side of the Dodge and a 29-year-old female exited the driver's side. Both reached back into the vehicle, and appeared to be moving items around in the area of the base of the seat or floor of the vehicle. When asked separately why they were there, they each had a story about problems with the car, but their stories did not match. The female suspect gave Deputy Eaton permission to search the vehicle. In the front passenger compartment where the male had been seated, Deputy Eaton located a small locking safe. Both suspects denied ownership of the safe. The female offered for Deputy Eaton to open the safe and the male stated, "it's not mine, go ahead and open it." Inside, Deputy Eaton found packaging material consisting of over 50 unused plastic baggies, a digital scale with drug residue on it, a methamphetamine pipe with residue inside, two spoons with residue, a baggie containing a white crystalline substance, and another baggie containing a brown tar-like matter. A field test of each substance confirmed them to be methamphetamine and heroin, respectively. Due to the location of the safe being at the male suspect's feet, Deputy Eaton placed him under arrest. The male also admitted he drove to the location in the Toyota truck and his license was suspended. The female suspect said she met the male at the location and he got into her vehicle with the safe along with electronics that she was considering purchasing. She said while in her vehicle, the male called three to four other people who came to the location, got into her vehicle, and she saw the male retrieve methamphetamine and heroin from the safe to give to those individuals in exchange for money. She told Deputy Eaton that when he arrived on scene, they were reaching into the vehicle to hide the money in the dash. The female suspect gave Deputy Eaton consent to retrieve the cash, which totaled $1,000. The male suspect asked for a lawyer so no further questions were asked of him. The original complainant spoke with Deputy Eaton and relayed to him his observations. He was spot on with the drug call, in that he was a retired police officer. Based on the contents of the safe in addition to witness statements, Deputy Eaton arrested the male suspect on probable cause for Possession With the Intent to Distribute Methamphetamine and Heroin. A search incident to arrest of the male suspect also yielded $1,354, bringing the total cash amount to $2,354. The male suspect was also in possession of two cell phones, which were collected as evidence. As the male suspect was being Page 6 searched at the jail, three more plastic baggies fell to the ground, which were collected and turned over to Deputy Eaton. One baggie contained a white crystalline substance that field tested positive for methamphetamine; one baggie contained a brown, tar-like substance that field tested positive for heroin; and the third baggie contained smaller unused baggies commonly used for the distribution of narcotics. Indecent Exposure Arrest—In the afternoon hours of mid-May, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputies responded to an intoxicated person panhandling in a parking lot, who was also exposing himself (pants were falling down exposing himself). Sgt. Golman responded to the area and was told the 40- year-old male was in the Cenex Station at Pines/Maxwell. Deputy Cashman also arrived on scene and spoke with the male suspect while Sgt. Golman conversed with a witness who stated that the suspect had entered Jimmy John's and was intoxicated. While in the store, the male suspect allowed his pants to fall down to his ankles exposing himself He was asked to leave the store several times, which he did and then continued drinking from a bottle of alcohol. After he finished the bottle, he sat it on the table at the store and continued into the parking lot where his pants fell down again, exposing himself The witness said the male suspect walked out into traffic asking people for a ride, then went to Jack-In-The-Box before entering the Cenex. Sgt. Golman recontacted the male suspect and placed him under arrest for Indecent Exposure (Class C Felony). A search of his backpack produced a green Thermos bottle filled with an alcohol beverage; he was cited for Open Container and Consuming Liquor in a Public Place. According to police records, the male suspect had been arrested on 12/31/2010 for Indecent Exposure and the disposition in Spokane Municipal Court on 2/1/2011 was guilty of Lewd Conduct, qualifying him for the felony charge. The male suspect was transported to the Spokane County Jail where he was booked on the above-mentioned charges. DUI Arrest—In mid-May, at approximately 8:30 pm, Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Todd Miller responded to Dishman Mica and Herald for a one-vehicle roll-over collision. Upon arrival, Deputy Miller observed a red Chevy pickup truck on its side, and noticed where it had taken out a portion of a wooden fence. There were a lot of skids leading up to the crash scene and although the speed limit is 45 mph there, it appeared the vehicle was going well over that limit. Fire crew had to extract the occupants of the truck. One witness stated he had observed two Honda-type cars racing with the pickup. He said one car cut off the truck, at which time the truck lost control and left the road. He said he contacted the driver of the truck, a 56-year-old male, who admitted to racing and drinking. One witness estimated the three vehicles were going at least 75 mph. Deputy Miller spoke with the driver who admitted he was driving home after drinking at TJ's, where he had consumed three beers. When asked if he could perform physical sobriety tests, he declined, claiming he had a previous broken back. When medics attempted to give him first-aid, the driver claimed he just wanted to go home and did not need any medical care. He changed his story, however, when Deputy Miller told him he was under arrest and told medics he was in a lot of pain and wanted to go to the hospital. The male driver was transported to Sacred Heart's emergency room, where he asked to speak to Deputy Miller. At that time, he told Deputy Miller that in addition to the three beers, he also had one "straight shot" at the bar that he had forgot to tell him about earlier. A search warrant was obtained for a blood draw on the male driver, which was performed by one of the phlebotomists of the hospital. The male driver was cleared from the hospital (no serious injuries, just cuts) and booked into jail for the DUI. Deputy Miller also found that the male driver had two prior reduced DUI's on his license. Car Prowler Tries to Force Entry into Residence — In late May, at approximately 2:40 a.m., Spokane Valley Sheriff's Deputy Chad Eaton responded with several additional deputies to a call of a male attempting to force his way into a residence located in the 11100 block of East 10th Avenue in Page 7 Spokane Valley. The male and female victims said they heard noises outside the front of their residence. The male victim walked outside onto the front porch and observed a male standing by the rear passenger door of their vehicle. The 21-year-old suspect looked up, began yelling, and charged toward the victim. The victim ran back inside the residence and attempted to close the front door, but the suspect tried to force the door open. Once the victim closed and locked the door, the suspect began screaming"Kill me!" and broke the glass from the top section of the door, attempting to reach through to the lock. Unable to gain entry, the male suspect walked away toward the east prior to the arrival of deputies. Deputy Eaton found the rear passenger window of the victim's vehicle broken, and broken glass and blood inside the residence at the front door and on the porch. Deputies Hairston, Barlow and Hilton followed the drops of blood from the front porch to the front door of a residence a short distance away. Deputy Hairston noticed the male suspect walking toward the back door, while the homeowner was contacted at the front door of the residence. The male suspect, who was still bleeding, complied with commands and was taken into custody without a struggle. Medics responded to the scene to provide medical attention for the suspect and to assist Deputy Hairston with sanitizing and cleaning his hands from blood exposure. The male suspect was transported and booked into the Spokane County Jail for Residential Burglary and two counts of Malicious Mischief 3rd Degree. Mother Helps Deputies Solve Crime— In late May, at about 8:00 a.m., a victim of a vehicle prowl contacted Spokane Valley deputies reference evidence left at the scene. Deputies contacted the victim near the 18000 block of East Springfield and he told them his $300 Maui Jim sunglasses were taken out of his unlocked vehicle. He also told deputies when he checked his vehicle, he found the suspect's cell phone. Deputies found a number for"mom" in the phone, which they called, and were surprised to find the 21-year-old male suspect's mother answer. After explaining the circumstances, the suspect's mother told deputies her son was known to break into vehicles. She also provided an address near the 17500 block of East Sprague where her son was known to stay. Deputies contacted the male suspect at a trailer at the listed address. When asked about the crime, the male suspect admitted to breaking into the vehicle and said he acted alone. He also said the only thing he took was a pair of sunglasses, which ended up being the $300 Maui Jim sunglasses the victim was missing. The victim's sunglasses were returned and the suspect was cited/released for 2nd Degree Vehicle Prowling. Spokane County Sheriffs Office K9 Units Receive Awards - During this year's Spring Combined Washington and Idaho K9 seminar, Spokane County Sheriff's K9 Unit teams won several awards for their outstanding performance during the competitions. Deputy Jeff Thurman and K9 Laslo 1st Place Patrol Field Trials Deputy Tyler Kullman and K9 Deacon 2nd Place Patrol Field Trials Deputy Bob Bond and K9 Jet 1st Place Narcotic Field Trial Deputy J.P. Melton and K9 Pepper 3rd Place Explosives Detection Trials The 2015 Idaho Police Canine Association (IPCA) and the Washington State Police Canine Association (WSPCA) Spring Seminar was hosted by the Asotin and Garfield County K9 Units in conjunction with the Lewiston Police Department. The seminar was a three-day event that included training opportunities along with competitions. The IPCA website stated over 140 people planned to participate in the seminar with K9 teams and trainers from Idaho, Washington, Oregon, and Canada. We are extremely proud of our K9 Teams. They continually provide an invaluable and professional service to our community while working to keep our deputies and citizens safe. Page 8 h� ti A i� jla a im — • - S r " II1 ate}" 4' j -.-- t _* ~- \ , 1 1:'Ilk 1::! SHERIFF -4... ' SHERIFF OZZIE D.KNE2OVICH A - _ r r (K9 Teams Pic left to right: Deputy Bond/Jet, Deputy Thurman/Laslo &Deputy Kullman/Deacon) ******************** Page 9 2015 MAY CRIME REPORT To date: _ Yearly totals: May-15 May-14 2015 2014 2,014 2,013 2,012 2011 2010 2009 BURGLARY 74 96 370 464 1167 1101 1062 1027 936 725 FORGERY 55 73 253 279 659 850 826 593 341 297 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 130 126 681 649 1645 1628 1770 1566 1183 1245 NON-CRIMINAL 9 12 59 58 151 106 108 160 917 892 PROPERTY OTHER 125 113 626 591 1449 1469 1236 1126 837 933 RECOVERED VEHICLES 48 30 165 229 464 541 446 416 365 187 STOLEN VEHICLES 53 40 192 271 573 602 586 566 496 298 THEFT 236L 283 1245 1156 3096 3040 2636 2512 2365 2162 VEHICLE OTHER 13 16 84 113_ 279 268_ 287 195 3 5 VEHICLE PROWLING 85 99 503 531 1196 1206 1165 1491 1395 920 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 828 888 4,178 4,341 10,679 10,811 10,328 9,615 8,852 7,668 ASSAULT 101 74 455 403 1087 950 936 963 895 927 DOA/SUICIDE 20 19 113 102 222 225 256 213 188 210 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 58 41 247 159 485 538 600 714 1297 1226 HOMICIDE 0 1 0 2 3 2 2 3 1 3 KIDNAP 1 2 10 18 38 24 17 15 16 21 MENTAL 30 35 161 129 307 268 270253 289 310 MP 19 15 68 54 138 156 154 125 128 115 PERSONS OTHER 312 263 1448 1413 3366 3124 3112 2484 1692 1621 ROBBERY 4 8 38 31 94 96 79 98 68 75 TELEPHONE HARASSMENT 8 12 54 61 132 148_ 212 162 153 159 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 553- 470 2,594 2,209 5,231 5,531 5,638- 4,997 4,727 4,667 ADULT RAPE 6 9 33 34 70 38 89 67 44 35 CHILD ABUSE 4 5_ 16 21 42 26 27- 89 115 159 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 21 25 89 111 237 236 190 184 206 157 SEX REGISTRATION F 0 0 0 0 0 4 8 2 1 2 INDECENT LIBERTIES _ 4 3 7 15r 29 20 27 17 8 10 RAPE/CHILD 4 0 9 4 13 13 13 23 28 35 RUNAWAY 41 19 181 154- 406 397 530 510 490 440 SEX OTHER 1 8 20 30 69 46 38 56 215 211 STALKING 3 0 9 5 24, 21 24 19 18 15 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 56 47 259 230 604 440 424 341 215 175 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 140 116 623 604 1,494 1,271 1,370 1,294 1,387 1,271 TOTAL ITE 26 28 142 145 336 316 430 521 542 671 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 269 268 1,389 1,363 3,216 3,525 3,957 3,569 3,081 3,183 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,816 1,770 8,926E 8,662 21,434 21,454 21,723 19,996 18,589, 17,460 Selected Data for Comparisons `. `'1,.' Area: Spokane Valley 1 J Date Range: 1/1/2015 to 5/3112015 Previous Year: 1/1/2014 through 5/31/2014 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS CAD Incidents 0 4,086 5,377 3,839 3,850 2,559 4,163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23,874 Traffic Stops 0 847 1,246 933 854 675 931 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,486 Accidents 0 155 267 109 148 91 174 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 944 Stolen Vehicles 0 50 42 41 53 25 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 271 Vehicle Recovered 0 32 23 16 18 19 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 148 Burglary 0 87 98 65 84 31 99 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 464 Robbery 0 5 4 8 5 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 31 Theft 0 214 207 173 194 123 245 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,156 Malicious Mischief 0 101 145 89 148 47 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 649 Vehicle Prowling 0 94 102 88 108 48 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 531 Current Year: 111/2015 through 5/3112015 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS CAD Incidents 0 4,678 5,636 3,829 3,784 2,683 4,059 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24,669 Traffic Stops 0 1,122 1,194 774 708 652 923 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,373 Accidents 0 139 249 126 119 91 197 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 921 Stolen Vehicles 0 39 35 36 45 18 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192 Vehicle Recovered 0 28 27 23 25 9 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 Burglary 0 75 77 64 59 30 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 370 Robbery 0 8 3 8 5 3 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 Theft 0 282 218 237 190 112 206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,245 Malicious Mischief 0 101 180 100 140 65 95 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 681 Vehicle Prowling 0 68 88 89 104 57 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 503 Printed 6/9/2015 11:37:46 AM Rpt005 Page 1 of 3 Selected Data for Comparisons ::',h Area: Spokane Valley Date Range: 111/2015 to 5/3112015 Previous Month/Previous Year: 4/112014 through 4130/2014 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS CAD Incidents 0 796 1,021 796 815 472 798 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,698 Traffic Stops 0 161 216 182 196 106 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,013 Accidents 0 21 42 16 20 15 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 Stolen Vehicles 0 11 8 4 6 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 Vehicle Recovered 0 3 4 5 2 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Burglary 0 13 24 20 17 8 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 Robbery 0 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Theft 0 61 47 23 40 28 48 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 Malicious Mischief 0 20 38 17 26 6 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 132 Vehicle Prowling 0 11 22 21 13 5 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 86 Previous Month: 41112015 through 4/3012015 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS CAD Incidents 0 960 1,094 728 753 537 900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,972 Traffic Stops 0 286 265 134 160 147 253 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,245 Accidents 0 27 41 25 26 9 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 Stolen Vehicles 0 3 4 10 9 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Vehicle Recovered 0 7 4 2 7 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Burglary 0 18 10 11 15 3 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 69 Robbery 0 3 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 Theft 0 59 33 51 36 22 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247 Malicious Mischief 0 26 37 17 22 15 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 Vehicle Prowling 0 9 12 11 16 6 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 64 Printed 6/9/2015 11:37:46 AM Rpt005 Page 2 of 3 Selected Data for Comparisons ai' sl Area: Spokane Valley R Date Range: 1/1/2015 to 5/3112015 Current Month/Previous Year: 5/1/2014 through 5/3112014 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS CAD Incidents 0 978 1,162 786 842 527 973 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,268 Traffic Stops 0 177 241 175 168 134 256 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,151 Accidents 0 37 60 18 27 16 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 197 Stolen Vehicles 0 10 6 4 8 2 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Vehicle Recovered 0 5 4 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 Burglary 0 16 18 15 24 7 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 Robbery 0 3 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Theft 0 53 44 42 65 29 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 283 Malicious Mischief 0 14 25 24 34 10 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 126 Vehicle Prowling 0 15 22 17 19 15 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 99 Current Month: 51112015 through 5131!2015 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TOTALS CAD incidents 0 1,037 1,169 748 737 529 859 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,079 Traffic Stops 0 195 196 98 91 116 152 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 648 Accidents 0 37 48 27 24 18 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 Stolen Vehicles 0 11 13 11 11 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 Vehicle Recovered 0 7 7 3 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 Burglary 0 17 11 16 7 5 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 Robbery 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Theft 0 53 39 56 31 20 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 236 Malicious Mischief 0 19 40 19 30 6 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 Vehicle Prowling 0 15 13 16 13 8 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 Printed 6/9/2015 11:37.46 AM Rpt005 Page 3 of 3 CAD Incidents - Cities 3: ) (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) . 4' Date Range: 05/01/2015 to 0513112015 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD Incidents 33 267 214 23 9 2 32 195 100 16 3,755 7 588 5,079 0 10,320 Self initiated Incidents 26 11 75 8 3 0 18 108 25 1 1,124 3 480 1,606 0 3,489 Drug Self Int(Patrol) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 7 0 0 8 0 17 Traffic Stops 4 1 17 1 0 0 6 29 11 0 468 0 224 848 0 1,609 Traffic Stops(ARSTfCITIIN) 0 0 4 1 0 0 2 6 1 0 175 0 82 315 0 586 TS (Warrants) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 7 0 5 18 0 32 Calls for Service 7 256 139 15 6 2 14 87 74 15 2,631 4 108 3,473 0 6,831 Alarms 0 1 6 0 0 0 0 6 3 0 121 0 0 107 0 244 Accidents 2 15 8 0 0 0 0 4 8 0 143 0 10 190 0 380 Accidents(ARREST/CIT) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 11 Drug Calls 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 1 45 0 64 DV 21 0 8 0 1 0 4 10 0 1 126 0 1 202 0 374 DUI 0 5 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 84 0 9 104 0 210 DUI{Arrest) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 20 0 26 Pursuits 0 Suspicious Activity 4 13 20 1 0 0 0 19 19 0 441 1 40 578 0 1,136 Vehicle Recovered 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 18 0 1 26 0 49 911 Abandon Line 0 109 7 12 0 0 0 11 2 1 256 2 10 330 0 740 Shoplifting 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 57 0 60 All Arrests(ARREST/CIT/IN) 5 0 11 2 1 0 4 13 4 0 283 0 107 584 0 1,014 Crime Check Reports 0 0 18 0 1 1 0 20 17 0 427 0 5 572 0 1,061 Printed 6/912015 8:25:14 AM Rpt001 Page 1 of 1 RMS Crimes - Cities R ,:( (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriffs Office) t.i Y Date Range: 05/01/2015 to 0513112015 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW RF SCO SPA SPK SV WAY TOTALS BURGLARY 1 0 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 57 0 1 74 0 139 FORGERY 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 33 0 0 55 0 95 MAL MISCHIEF 6 0 1 0 0 0 3 6 4 0 82 0 1 139 0 233 NON-CRIMINAL 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 9 0 9 9 0 23 PROP OTHER 24 0 4 1 0 0 14 3 3 0 70 0 23 125 0 267 RCRVD VEH 1 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 15 0 2 48 0 73 STL VEH 4 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 0 0 20 0 2 53 0 84 THEFT 25 0 2 0 0 0 6 7 8 0 117 0 1 236 0 402 VEH OTHER 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 9 0 0 13 0 25 VEH PROWL 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 34 0 0 85 0 130 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 70 0 14 1 0 0 40 21 21 0 446 0 30 828 0 1,471 ASSAULT 7 0 5 1 1 1 3 12 2 1 71 0 2 101 0 207 DOA?SUIC1DE 2 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 9 29 0 3 20 0 59 DV 17 0 3 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 45 0 0 58 0 127 HOMICIDE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 KIDNAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 2 MENTAL 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 25 0 1 30 0 62 MP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 0 19 0 34 PERS OTHER 8 0 19 0 1 1 12 10 2 1 242 0 19 312 0 627 ROBBERY 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 2 0 0 4 0 6 TEL-HARASS 0 0 1 0 0 0 C 0 0 0 12 0 0 8 0 21 TOTAL MAJOR CREMES 36 0 30 1 2 2 19 26 5 4 443 0 25 553 0 1,146 ADULT RAPE 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 1 6 0 17 CHILD ABUSE 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 1 4 C 9 GUST INTFER 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 16 0 1 21 0 44 IND LIBERTY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 5 RAPE/CHILD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 RUNAWAY 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 0 1 41 0 111 SEX OTHER 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 SEX REGIS F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 STALKING 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 0 5 SUSP PERSON 14 0 4 0 0 0 8 2 1 0 27 0 5 56 0 117 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 18 0 13 0 0 0 12 4 3 0 119 0 9 140 0 318 DRUG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 26 0 40 TOTAL 1TF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 6 26 0 40 TRAFFIC 15 0 3 0 0 0 9 9 6 9 147 0 56 269 0 514 TOTAL TRAFFIC 15 0 3 0 0 0 9 9. 6 0 147 0 56 269 0 514 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 139 0 60 2 2 2 80 60 35 4 1,163 0 126 1,816 0 3.489 Printed 6/9/2015 8:42,55 AM Rpt003 Page 1 of 1 _smk-pr---.... . ki--°. 1. -. (f• -:7: . Clements .,..CentrA .t la l'e'l Billelarlt- ' r f r- 16,.. - F 1 _. • -- e. C.s, - --- i- , tik % 41 x ------- E ,s......--z., -p,d C.ii . ..,-.„,.. o § r,.Ark, , ..... ,e9Seph.. 7 . . , , .6.,.._;.,_:_•,.„ ,.... • , _......e .5. . , , -2.,! R•''''''-ri- 0, . .cicr.akri 4-- J • ‘,-F 6 fruit H911- ,3•'.1'--.3. ,, ,...._t - obi . g• 7 __. Ir. 7; P'' -Sl /...-C 0•- --- ..--91. ----' .- -:Broad . 19,,kdi c.i.•••i _ Fraser' 9...--' ' ' 8 3 _, , 1,.., ._ .1 . ..— i.-_ . -[ _, . . , .., ...,......,,,i,„_•.4. r -- 9 , - .--1 --_ 1 , k,-- , L,._ ..a...... L- ---4_•_,L-g jp— - -5 .- -1 *- :_-_-2- tu • -7-13-197eeton _ --= 1 Ikni-t:.°/ . - -1 . . Li .] -g —_ _ ._--- . ___ _ __. 4_.. _ ... , 2 _.=--' :9 .1 '--Walton [ ' Z.i. ' P7ackweg.,x, liSpokane - .f, -,..,c A 'e ,L' ...- ; --1' - _I-ai'---=T'—i 6t 3 - - , .eF • 4duttrial Park 93 , ,.51 Z -:.'n-.. ----liiry'- , . • n ' q.'1. -- a;' ' ', ' .E % 7 ''S •:. ,,,r,t--4 , . ./:.,- : GAT0 .--r- . , . • ,- PeCNI. - 41 ,9. -..-oi,„,c .-.e1,117,1- ;'---a.H=-- . S'. = ?•r--- 7,• -, • , .--•-- -... . ____ - r.10-7-___? -qt 1 - 4- ''. I I GrA4-..9' 4 ,,„.7.-, El Grazer. i-__.0176/iia-4-kii -71-r--'1"r•=.1 ./ i'AD I, :-',_-_-_;Al FAL _:-. -1_. ? :— 1 - or-- - 4p ,.., • A--f,T.A..„- , • - - , . •'...11=-1,11 • '----rilis ____ ' _' _ -- --, . ti, 2-tiriett.---r•-•--'T - ' '',, - -..--_:-•„.._..Th-,.E.-1 _ _m,„, ,...6 .__ 2 I -:''I,- ___•.-J ?,. a Spokane Valley — illiviood I Kin ' Mamisici. _ ' _ •---11_P__"%i gr. ..1.''''' • -^:--"--- t- . FL\• ' ----C-'7---F-- SI-41'1'211' -- - ._ 4 I' i -n -indlcM --' --2L -'-ive-iIcy Lalce '1 - —11d14311----. , Old - r.C.',-1 . ..• '1- _I --- ---!...-• ....,_ .,,,,,,-,,K.,79:, .,,, 0 hlre ' --,...4i9'4'• -,—.' - -n --.`k..1 . r •,_.-- - - I, _ - - -- ---,-._-,-__, -r.-_s ...:71:--,,,--..,--- -i„e . - 1.--.1•,.g:.,-V- 2 <-.'------_. • - ' 'n'W'R • I a I;•=7 E'..-,ck•-• r 7.:- _ • I A , .,--- . _-- I ' -_,r : L: romc 1 5 - - . 0.- -rn' o -z---2-a'- __,,_I- -2 I 'il:,-- 1-- : ----'••,,,,T.:. --1?-'',.r-_•1- -711A1 , P ff."t• TO_Win_c_jc -.-,... -- 1- , Tic i-S.1:,:. ..,t S 1 i.. ,, i . cuiltla-2 1.,..,.,,. ' x Dein , .1--. - .1...1..0„. -,• , ,i,_ - . .r.taonl. _i 1_e,,;L e- —=.1.,-,--- ,, .___c-acini-iy.111. _ 11-4flx: 1. -1 ' - ,...." •.` ill'4,-.-7-T-TiE-AA ,-2. 7-- r--• ng I , a ___J _T 1_ .71 ,L,..,..,-. .._21 _....,, _._ ,.___... ____ ,._• ...,•_,..ip„,..- -,-4-0-,-t m -,,„ -.,--, , -F 1 f:1-4,4--ti - — --- 1 ---, - - .-, .• A,k, — ---1---1,_—...,-.0----1- . ,._. .. , , 1 , . ._.-e--- --'-- g-,--1 ., 4, ..,•_.:( - - I 1H r ] I ,-= E co e : .• . _ • 1, -1.------------Frt.4.!!:°-', IA - '-`-' -7-- i ,_1•14§noo t----H-- "A-----a-1 - 3- • t--,---==tr-oniL--Aaai m,—. - i ' 7--r— 1-1 41..s. ' 1.14, 01-rbin z , .L.---.. lk 9ex-• _t______1-- • .-- 1 -,g-- ---,-.-i ,_ 1 -1 I SE,arkt t- ci .. ' - 1_ t71.'1 11l- - l', , - -- .-• '_- • - , -1.- .----4 I-4r 1--— 1 a , ___I,s,_ , . -11- Rii.-Paiik --al-ir-tH I .17- .., 1 I. _ i i _ 22d-I_ ;)0,-1- -..- ,-.,:.- _ 1.21 i+A.4_4.4__: ...c: ' ..:E x.1041 I 4 - -_ _ . _ -_L_ I -45•-Aiii iE-,=. 7-- ' ---_-40, -- u:__§.- •E.- .% _. J_Ji ..,_. 4i4'E .. _. v __Ez•-:,- --..- r .1' T L±dt- t i'l ol--.7-°- -1 ' ,...,,, Shekel/ ,,,,,Ar .-.0.1-rd .,1:?4,,-1_ ... -..'-Lcil<e Friar- -' . ii"--i---- . -i -.$1..--1-t• • Hr - .r; - i '''' --4, v -,--T, -,--p-Hd...—,,*;--r--1-,7.117-i " - ., -...------ ..... .t,. .-.-•' ..Lr. 5 , 1 ,,_.-41-,' , , 7' •--, , .a,-) - 1: ,-^--Cowl., _L_ L , - •• .,..,-,.,_ ---_,. • :94;. H 1-,i-• ---.-' Va.. . -- --1-126.-1 j r.,7,!.. , k:". 6-r_ ..‹ '''' ' -• ----"--•= i ---- s T . 1 , - --E3,.. -X_, 1 ----X_ .- -1--17 .'-.9 N.--n , I i •'!'' "dr • . ., - -.--T. -2-...7----:-,•6.- - 1-1--_:174- --- ,--- I 2 • .. l_IM.114, :,_ ,1 ip . v; -t, 3.l ,- -t1 4- 4. 4', -,0 '- n --' I E• - - - . 4,,. . „ f • . ,0_ , ,_._ . _ . r ,-i 1 -- -7 11$ •-,ar ••-•'-i--m--L- , - '- - ,..."--•--• 1. _I--. L 14'61 0.. i... _ -, isA nu, .- - ._. - 1' - .- , min . -t• ' --1- - 2 ... ,.; ,. ''' ' _ - i --'' , - -- I:th ' 5"''- '-...E___44.1919-A '11 • -• - - - 1'13139 l ' '-•'--- = ' --- 1 • - Z 1 •' '- 'ir-l'-'-'1-c,0"i'k L't 1 ,,- 17€117,2'', •4.4., ..- :-..... , --.•„e_'.1 — 'IL A ••• 3PighI • . ..k7 1''...r*• 1 tili ..1. ,-.• E-1 lit-.1 X, _`• . . .I....... --=!..,- .4..1.•i T .,X.!I-I -i•b, Ar-, .- .,.-L* 1-... -.. _,.. _ X- -•,-Fpnir.cc +-•--, . •1. d-L,-.--,t,e,_ 27..otd 0 - --151E1.7.-L;06. 74 `r m - /.9... ••,.' 1401-d---z-F- 1— hai-,..- .1,t'.- -171.7-'- - =1") 1• Li___;_•-•.- '''' ...---•,..-- ,_ere-.-;;,,,,.. --Gaiame,'- . -Coc.gress --. ...,...-0 .3' - , --,v-i . ,i1 . 77' __LT] 2.,*511g ,_ 6 -r, -* -' • -I-- - -31.1i]li .1!-.-- F---- • 1 i__ ., u _ a .:.wc.._ -33rd;.- =- -r • 7-Illili -- ' 1"-- ' lc,: pi--.l.. •-•32.-. d E i , 2 st-- '..'"' - Ull' 1 -- . -. pr" Wd--- -'. '' 4— 10 ......,t „..k:r ----___ _ ,___.- ----, 34.31 n•11._ ...'9- 5,_'. ,--._ -'22'' .7_- , ,13.1, _ 4,,,,, 15.41_,s Terre ., . g---J 0. Z- . 1 +3/- ,FT :-'1,...-_ _399h.,-,2 ' Cl-L".9re9N, _ . i I -....,. i 4 411C- • 5;1_, s ..-", , T., l'Oth ---1--,1 .1. I ar E --- - ,- '''''r IA' 4.6_' 1 .-"9--nn c y -ert. 47-Tinl- •r- A 1191 3.--Thn-r. ' -42n9F4r Fe , , , '- 's-j''' ci: . 0* r :N. .2 -5,-,...-,4-. :1 T.- 5:4.11,— __ r Residential ir -.._......44, 43rdl '-r--___•,.,10-§-;I 3.....Lrj, Lis okii,c, TISell . -fr-E-- - ---,--.._ . . . i .2.'n Burglaries --- .-- f- • -_, ..5-• - 4,-.• L.— -N.... ..„, - _: ...wink 'f• Ti '- -F.. •..-c-- 5 a 1. -- r 1, 13 - Fen..,1_. _...,0. .-__et 5cof - .$ 1 * . • - e e, ,,,, . S. , ME Medkum •_rk, IQ .°.. ''''.W 5W) , ,Z --:(k,,,;01,...T,.• ,.,-,--- U. High 20 ! 3;2 l as F i miles i 5 May Residential Burglary Hotspots Map Produced: 09 jun 20 i 5 * -:---pilke.' aprIltret5 ',-*" 't',- .'il Pa....i • . . S ----' .0-6 420- ,, ..,l-.r.-LIM-4 ,-, E n- L ,-..7.' -t' A t6 --''' Erii, _ •,?.. 1 •-_,..-; • I /0,_ ,I., g•f.-,..0 2.e.b03,--'„,1_,D.,,-• r. _;.;',...- --3, - •0,;0..r--_-... •••0.- 7I.. --__ -_ _. der' 3 i '7.21.-1-1- .1E__: -. -.."-tc.e.. 0• 9.-- I, &PA --..._C-Z11 7 kancial* -' 1 E •.ip- FAvezr.--.-g- "•••' ERIN H.11 MI' -.. G ratite -- _,.....__- ..... .1, r . -,00een' • '• ' --., -H--_ -''"Z •4 C-PlY'A. 1 --7 - .,. V6hth. 11 '.°1-' Irt-s---Tr-v, r---;• . ,:e• otp.pic oU. ' I s --.;0-.... z • ''' .1 0;4 -ilkt=4! • ' 44t4'-• -,._• A i -Cr- .-r-r..-r‘ 1-i I I , iLiAtelles .'. 9-- „,..... - .:-__I--• 7...6 ..., , 1 woriby, 4°.A.e [3--,.. ' - ..:.= 8 __, ___. j.:;._ ...._ ,,,_:,.,, .. ..,._ -,-__ q...7•0-_--gElki19- V.0054 1. _-..--: • . ___., -..z, 0'-- -E-1,3 gkh . , _..__._s ..... • ,x61150..r----1 -'-- -EGP——I-i-- .• --_ .----- — r-TAT—-,2-'-i`-=-4-0-' .--- '-'-' e s -— iSicikane _ . - -• ,. . • ... - A, 1--'-------a Jraiustri-S-FirkA . 1. 8 ., ..., .-vran ' oi 1,,E '' ,_..i.-asro„T, ..z. G_Ir .01 _ 5 ._ I 4--4- 2-Indu_strial Park EI gi. .3 4 ,.....,,, i'Ll''''.• 11.--'-- 5 .. 1 - - . r... .. upip ,:::'- 2.---.1/- ' -, • '-•..- ..r.....ra C .• .1 ..,, • 9 " S--- - 0 E 101 _ J. ___ r--_:1•_--- IFIricik --- :DV ---71-. I.') E0c11)-rwi.----.--°41-2.----.ilIWOod ' -C''''‘O 'Frediild` - i'l•"-3bc'' -?•. - -g:_. III ___, 035F000 r.` . .0%, -.r.: --E-----&—$4a ,..:7,:--j 4"''' 1 1-"j"-: -1111 41-T1-7. 7---- __i1---e, 4 1 -.. ___,, __ _ 6 ..i..,..., J I! ir__•=:=___„_, _„...„ . ' -.- i•-•,‘'.--1-: ,J7 J roct' 1 - Irtiom 6.17 -7-‘,..1.!r.. _ ,...1....i.-- v 1-11:"7Fa:S. O / . t—_Lgg,_ , ,__, . ,.... ___ . . . - ,., -- .._ci.o.d. & -,--r_ 1 1 ., P S • ••.--,•,; ; alley , ; L.-Ermina il' , _- •_Ect_11 -. I-- i riandield -------- - - ." / --=?.- -4,--• 0 'an I '• r- '...1.4 ". -,",' 41). • .Ton; Krw- 2 . --AP,-—.• 10.1,,-,, fp *-' _ _ 1 - -1 ' ' AL ' 121 .r• ' -- - ._. .- .. v• _ -- - ._ _ .,,,,...,... _i ,, w ti.e....._tF_ ________ htiel:"....,. —:„..,-;i :• ,1,c_w___'_ :::itty-e...,h_...Lake_ _I - .,, , ,-, - T.•-_ . - 91.- % ,- ---.----- • --., '.....1 1.7--11.-a46,...i.a_•-. 1 -• "."'s„1„. ' --. -:-- lima. ,.. ..g- ----- .., -- • ,,-. , , --I) _=.7,... .._, •— , i7. -- • 1 ..„,:,.... 40 _ .- ,,•_21 _-___}.._&.7 ,_,, .,._.I 1.. • ___-- . _ - _ 1, -- !core II L'-.- ---_ - --. - CD 1-- ri' '....._.. 1 1=4--7:3---- I_.!_..,_u_ 8020. '.- __ a ---;.th_ g___1 '- .. e, _ __-_ ,t,4_ _. - -___ . o......---.-L-1c -r-,.-tmo, ..• ii-- & roe.. • ...... - l c,24.ki. r. k 1_f., --it, _ __ .1_f H.:-,_..1..1 0 [1 -_ , ' . .. ir_i_ L• 1 ca"!...!'—..._ -7....--`-- 'b' - - ratkil le-4. _._, L - r.- --. -- .-•••-,-.: ''---'a 1 r 1 1 -",-. .7- kt '.- -'5'-'-.'--V ,-.. 11: ii___:' . C-00no-f VIsta --, ' Iii1 i_sprr-t2"77_-to- •-•-•"o' 171-- .8`k- in 1-------r-1--7' ' ,1--ri--q '!_L' 21,-...,d_,..- 1-‘,1--_,-.11 ,...:,, ..-in ._ 1-'- ozi.: 1 . EL l•_7, 1- J.,...1-, -LET.'10,v -.• - ViAnn•q., ..L,- • L —.Ehs...,, f.- V' 1-1 -I ' 7 1-- • T-- --: , ---tr—w'F--- run.2-17.1.- 1' __; _-, 1 . 40 Ilk, ' .,r - 7- 1,5!-- Leh_o --- •-'--------,---,- -.-----I.' .. .%, ,_ L_-.4,- --I--.----1 •- - - , , .._ -0 rlin. -. 1 1.10111*••••-0, I • = I 1.-AIIM-1.-: ' ILA' - ---,— - —,--0•191,_ f_= , Ai)- 1: -- -.61,-9•2,1,4 7--1 -. - .... .1. • -' . - - ' ft I ai: -.) • _ ___ I ‘ -- ' 1 ,?SS r 1 0 . -r_l•d- ,.- -1-I- 2.,.,d - 114, 1111, - - . .A.1. .,1 151- 1'i , --' '---4)-Z'. . .. 1-1-1 17' -- , -x-P, 1 4---- 17 --3•di.401 ... ... - .-_.,, ..,. _a 1.26 i • - co 3 p •••••• .11. -1-4.- .--__ ,.,_. ._,._ 1 -...,,.. ,. .... •_. . , _ ..1 _•• _...„,,........ ,,,z0._„..cL...,-•• .,7,- i, . , cll. ,-,—• ' Ai. . - . 7-6L-1 ;-41 -ShePey voo i , f . .4TE ;-&-(1-I-- - ...t= 7••• 6,1 s.- -_-.A..,,,,,, '—r. a9-;±-- -. I ith II- 0.1.1,'ow.-- -----1,--;[_+_,_i____ ..%. '-' ' = f 1---• ''' 1 -- .-- • --1 -lath 9'h-1-1-titir ---%..., ."--7, .A ••-•_ .. - E.- • X _-_ 1-_th,--1 ".- - - -V-__ _____,V 3 --,---„rf-:--;', ,:r. , 0,,,,.._,.. .• .,...5 T... .f- 471-7-"it.'i 5 ' ' -.•,. .7" T--,..- • • - 4 '- .• 1 • -.1.... •0`,-7- ' 1 . Ni.----.:: _CIFA • ____%,, Pht ....r. , 1._. _ _--ri• , r i ,... .A., 144,. -' -- -- ,1 -1---' ' --, !--• _w___g, , , -1„,_.___,---L , • -• - at ---._ 1 4- , _• • _ 2- , - imt --1, - ..j, J - it ' 'L__I - ... 1...,. -- _i• .-1•19th-J-- . •--.1 .,-------.4: 11.-1.Ek 1.--I 1- --k!' -,,,--atia,__I - e--•_•: ' if ,, , • r...,— • -...- usiht •i.--:: -tr.,--".. -,c:r,-,1 • • -.. - ----..k, -, ---,---2oErci- -1_ -0..,-, t.., -i a. T_--....e.-. --j-' .1 - -.•r•',. .',1,,r Arl -.U..1,..1-0w-2f.. -.1. • • , ', % -J(:D=r_ --. ., - -row-- 7"- „...• 4,:- ' ---, 47 1-' i_T-:-."1._i I 71-• - 1-•_ —::-.1); :. • ' --,- ---t,,,,, -a 4— , , ,,_ , .„6.,. ..-*-__.... -...,. 1..- _ - .--r--3. r. i,''' '..C) 1' .4.L.''...r 1.. . , 1 r.'7 Sig th • .. ...ark,._J 25th . . , 211a1- '-I ti?.,..---...- -_ _1_... 21.A., - -- .' , , 5 ,0 ''•g - ..,_.._!. I -i p •I w 2k '7'''' 1 1 •j'-271:11--` 6' 1 - "47. -11_.'iatil— p .'". 7-.1...__:61' ..,21'.. _EIS- • 1 .0 . r• 161,--r, z u .5 F-•• •,. 1 -- - : • •b• - ct, ! , - - . • 4.! - .__ ::I-ii ' . 3,‘, . ._ ,: L .`E 1-,.t--.74, , rl._. .: ' t. . -...', ,tre.,,,i : . • . 0 .--.3,5th ma'4 -. ,-- , 1 ASJI C ......___ i 0 . . _. , . ..._a_ -.g. ... ' 4 4' 9 •,; . :„_•:._ ., •, .,.,,, ,, 37., • i ,.,Terre_ r .A. o- '-%,,' CS •I itli',-4 '1`.1„1. IF C.' I o .s. ...e -.,- .X. - - A P •'•..7 An , ... ELIO I T•71,3i*Is.---.ti-a w . ...q...d ,i- • .4.. • I fk,..- I '..5.. -9-1 43.-d! _ 3-, crispy - ,44a, r •-a - Stolen _ , - --I'--- - ----T--- I l• - — 4 45ch y. ..4.-16' , Vehicles Asii, ,.k.... t •--- -,.._,5,..,----x: - . -47a. • .._„, ,... Jo.- I . ,ffl 46th 1 ..I -...- AFO'-,-14., ... i-fth-_,/--:‘,---. - ---• • - c 1,,, 1 ,E. - - ..., -.4- ,_.1 r- ,- Amax f.30-._ Glenr it _- 07, ____ ..s. r-_..t'' ' . Err,,,,,1 • ,,•ra g 11= Low •1.- Fur 1 :,',C`E. , ' - ....r '- _g. ... --,-et—'•'SI* a 03 ro -6,- - --,-,, :le-• et Medium ,...,.. i!„. •,- ..-.k‘.-r•-. 44.P- ' - E 0.5 • 2 t''''''.1/4:6ok' .?Pa‘..6 .c 5.7th_.2 _1 . I 1•2?-.. sr,.. ...,4r••...._. L.• ,_Ste i -ianr- • --- '..0. Z'11, - d Mill High " A. , 0 as. 1 Miles 2015 April & May Stolen Vehicle Hotspots M ;)Pro : I il I 0un 2015 * Cern- '-�"' `rt 4'22 z ----. s` Rhin ' - k --kr �iI ? -s C. _ .. T-; .- E . 0 ` — = , ______ -. , septi .ObFree HI •• yi a .4 v,7Gtce ter-d--i 17uda.y -e , k R°waK-' _. c.Goo s$ ?'_4� Pr ' YL 3 2', _ f { s ' s , w'etd i •6o, o-f j -617r r = a. t`, 5 = acetaQ Ate- rao i ,I" - = ° "rt' " x . _ Fraser-. - -- r — Haar • P,1 tri ._ tke7. - a lpk 'V -. ~ Sj--'Sr—p—olcane • ,.. t u « dI.unotse n• e. land T•,_. - ; ! __ ,�- �.'C 3 - S a"d'gmON*R t LI $ _SSI - ji4 1 $- 1!IAF — '-1--.—'_ �I [ K'' O • •- '.`�M'an Pr, 7' , 1, 1 ••-• •_ o oil •-.t - - i,_Krabc - _5. --- - b. - 7 pn6 - id - Rutkr rprirnp r '' ffi� .._��., - --� _ '..t _ cns-,- x 6 ].. 4 , LrFd�,� • al Spokan ValHey ,.. 1_ 5 , a _ _-tl rf„er __ _-.r, ,_,. - __:.=. I.._Lal l - - SYunwn' - �' i."--�.. _ fM1d.uaw'- At°�; _. - - _ ri _ _ -. � __ n -1,21•T!'. t y =, m - 1 _ .3 fft Old - 1 ,-r 4-'_,...--57. ,ltssb_ s E! Sd Ci i' f,- rhz�"ar 1 Ftisclyr-.^ 1 u �T _ °"-'']' gg 9+Sr a; �! ,. r 1 } L �. _ _. I — � r O 1 - --vi 4n II, r15. .Desince a= r- '�-1 n ,6°, siY a Bra1d 1 _i --f-g-_ _ 1 - 1 l e Lake _ C-oSi1vY Vaa Ado MMtt1„.. .� i�1,�'r y rr _-r-7-7-n I :. _L sir �bfor ot 1 1 - n tr,.e Ado 1_ -) tI-� -o_ ?--r - - li. a _ c JAI►, r i_ I n' r r ... 1 �f-r tf�°n- �l _ dc,�_ ]` t Gy�y..-i c_11#°n _ Tirza- o T 1! 41. r_ dl Esc i _ ` f �4.�.L__'i .�� 1hn ., . seiFi` ° • _FVI , cPacGc � ``.. _ - `—_ -itfr nr i_—. AE,1_ r' ; I � 3�d.hk- #1 0— i i I - r!I ni . -- "--csai-- ! 1' 1 '.-5-T ,1 a i 111 -Ide 1 wT -w-,tits _ 1 1 ft- I'-. • T'1 _-L_��1 I$�' n -`.p 'I `c ag - t7-_1¢el,$ x iSN - I 1 t i ;_. Meth #`,;t ` I1 1 i ,_et r.e' ., -I'�I y: mss' - • t r--'-1"1-5'• -,-,la l F-- }ete fi'hl k-'r l_[ y� 2?; .1'v'c c' .Barn - ' 1 c ...Y �:'. • " 17ad1 �,' l�t �.!w�'•. ! `4J1 ,. �R d b_QSrltir 'Z�. -F4tt�`sE a .,rF� I Is L R ''.• Sn41-_ 1-diI-L 1:_ . r 1 _Z2i.d _-J4d1 t_ J a` • !Tide' .6.... i Lwatrels _ '. - _ • a -= s-r-• 15 '�! F t _ 2W1 �� E v .,o.- —a`_ 4dch •� Sp10+ro' ..v�7�t-17E� }- 1 �= 1 i --.4 t� . en V, '_- _. aC y.°R• - ...,;--7.,_.., i7 I . ' vn •rte A - S F 3' r —:L Maa { r.— V Hil: _ aids _ ,' .. r S aad, to edu Tr-. 7r, -,10 '.'-- h--1 -- cl 'pmnarq, - t FIs , o , baa: 8 l m .42nd u1 E• �+�' a- d._ ` 3 c c, E 4314: *--- all ,� ,1101---- -. & ``' q+ s• .-.,sh_i a X14 Vehicle _ 3rd n �' �3ik.. - �lydi iSd1� T _-, _ Y y1d1 I- n� rib �,:r1a� ,E--= _i •• a'ed J. ud A. XL i- 1 Prowling - a1 4,,,--_-,k co.,, _ J' s E -,'.---, 7.4.?....- Aumic00_71X_ c tt, +Y ,9;' hanes Cg 'x •_.F..,..0 '°3' CnP:' 'rp - e tom.-, te a. ; _, ^, Low r as _ '� Medium SSd+'- - Ari+ ' • a 4r ' - - c` nd. , shu, 1 1 t . , ,F — .fe U 7-u ; o,ti°I°tiouk,. ac.i?-:. c i , - 1'I'.--iE11f Li 4�c - - _ i._ •R -7 .ia1,d'._ 4 _ % area v L ® High 0 0.5 E rides 2015 May Vehicle Prowling Hotspots Map Produced: 1 E 09 furl 20 ES * kII 5 0017-ents ___I _ __vju„-FT,---- • 7..-Ce00 ----- ck ___ --Mike I E,... . • r. x i . • • , • 5 Cm," 7 ,..* -- 11.Pft E `2, 6 .- - 410 .r .1•_'__. ' ---- - v.-4 •.__ -- •- ..- .. . v• .,.. aerk-trc 1.,Grmitt :tracr0-0-.1er7 Pr-c kr.-1--- . Mandalay --6-'''-- J. . 4. -•k •j _17....,___Cf.iv, -5. , --,:-'---i . -• !--fig. -4- -.....%:--- 4. . ,_ s•,r r. .•_.•••••••n .. .. ,...--4.• •1-,...0,____, •. - - - l'i'o•f:' -- •itii r- - :-.1 -g...pvic 7 .c-t-L--1 ,-..- '"_„- 11--- P - -'-' F•rat0r...4_ :r, 8 -, (4_1 rWell.rs _ _• I_ . ' . ---"--- 0 2- G.40ra,..: I -GI- ---- r r '11 i 4-•--: 0.---1 _--1-6._ . ay , _ .-• -...._,- Lonesk.,- _ ----_, . -- ..-,- ,_.- . --. • - -- ,,,._ - ,.......k ,,,,..- Er--: •-• wer11", -1 '---1-'--- X .% ',Atiatt00 i -I 1. ' 141 r11-- a-- .] - g, ... -j 5 r-5 ' t I 1 Z _ . --%-_ I -C:r--.. 1 - 1-71-171*'. 11.1 a FS Millwood , - - •e -C c „. c. . -1c- _••=___. • , 111.7,2t _ .x.c _;_„L.,,z_io .7. .. --#6-CI) --: -- ., • _-- . ....- _1 1 1 ,,e g! It -2--....g 1 ..., . _._ --,- -3.- .6'' - lie"-645ridc Yirateou Pi b I ___! 1-t i'''''1 . -A-' •id .---•--- ....- --,.. --' g- - ----, - -- ..-- - tb°•V..' 1; .• -- ----1 , 7 . - "0, t---- -•r' -r-Falferiru-1/ 1_.„ --- - - -1-G 1 T''7 .1.••,•-• r- i 7 ,, 0 --- -.-,.___;_r _,,, 4 ' -.-'L '--1- 6 Li.,.. .c.g • ',.7-=.-It--E.* ___E•=_ ,=staer7-. B,,,,d,„---,---i- 4 :1..„1,,,,,i , ' i - " • Ll•- ___;- --- ,--1- -12- Ards-e-j*Iim" , J,-..-_. i '' -ILO -lowI ,-- - t Spokan ; , alley, . ._ _:._,...,..._ 4 H , • ,, __ _ oi4 - - _a ,..___-=_-. , • irsorowd_e _ - Kr., 0 : 1 goo-o-. h- • - " j----1-. ''"11---' -'''' 2 L _c, _- . ...-- 0--- . __ , -1--4-,„ - _ •.14.7 1 T - '• 16. ,,,ilki::•ge-- ;,• --W-14,12r.•-+ _-_0!..)k-ratie a _Bil, _',,N.-__it;' __1____,..,:0 VI' - r-E•1_: r , _ -,_ •@.-' -- .- 1 Y-. •,- -J -L'-"- 1111., ! -1-1 et-,_V5Vt' ll......___ --',-----.-• •,' -, --".-410 I r --- -A .7--;:.'EA-* -;-'19r•-4-: r . 7_1 mt ILgICciria-, IL:-.-..i. , .i. _40__-1--._,' =_---- ___ Lake ' ..._..,- ,..... :- 1 i= i .-- :- -, _ - , -- a ai- ifre ,I s -71 -7-e7- --:-1-rarttl,?.. 1 1:s. 11 --- ---1:1 - --i-Lf rriar-e-ai,• 1-tg-I'':1-10, 0 - ' - --Li1=--1--=- --r---L---- ---r' cl" ---- ----=-- ''' .-6 3 0.4.11 re, 0 ..'- *6 "I- £ ----cw;-. ---:. .-. L-V-W,-1-64j1 - la, ' ' J. -r- -- - - bt.' - F m ' [ I a - 2 _ --,--..,_1__ 1 . g 7' - I I ---- - • st•-•01Ne. - g 1 --.,-.7,.---- I --A -,v-----1 . --1 _ 1___ . ' ---1 i--.1•14"4".• .7' ,,--.-•,- ti. . j -- , j _,), - 1-2__,-:Freaci_ r :- -.. , ,_ .•- 1"41---2- 1 ____::_ 1 1_.......k ,rn_-__,._;: , 1 . 7 1 -- _ r- .L_L_.-7_ 0--(3 v- .-----17r F----- - • n ,el 0.-, L - - F. 1 - --7- ,... 0 -- 1_,___ • '-'1U !Vi.; '6 " L -1-ili - T - .: .tp ty, 0 1 'ierg--;-'_0-7--I---T 81-cn1 . I .-•IT LA A- r I -4. -,),; - , .. .......-- L --.---1.-- -_ -it)'ird 4-I.-,r-• -Tv-A. -,---- -cp • ,i, 6 !---.•r:' -" ---1-1-,-ion _ _• sr .. _ . _ e" _1, • `.- " ' J - •, 1._ •,w4.,h- -r, :.111-/--I•',T1 1 604- .,-I- 1 , -".Shelley :41.1.44 . i -, is_ eg :7# • 117 i _ ..„ ._ E , - --- _[, ,I.,;, /-=A4" k---,. -1-6 1 1.:- -1V-., •._.74.41 ., , 8-'-e.W--- - ----'"----"----1-4-. - la - I 7 1 1 - 111 -/-1' •S'71...,,‘-----..:Coor''r,,MI - --..*-. '•:--1--'-'1C-1, -..1- 0 -.1 -• . . a : - -771.7----=...,V -_., .0--L---7.=-1-1.-SI ' "5--1 1 4r-z ..';)_..r..er _ I •rht•-ta- r--_ _•11Akti--,-. 1 ,, .•-_.r.,_._._--e,...:-•„_>,.__ x 1 irs b. - .. .•, ., 4.., . , , •Lt ._ i E.- ',--. _T. _,•_. ,. I-T..- --T-2--7 1_ - ...„.1.2,.J _ _ ._-,=.s.,-,..?,1_17_7•Tii - 2- . - '''•i=7::_,--i-ty-- ,,,,,4,,__- = 2. • 111.---.14-11-1' 16th -r]jj, -._ .-.._ i-_. , .,.. 0 .1-",,--i- kl. ,• - Nth 1 I -- --. 1 1 c 1 . -1,1•1-- -•.---1._-, 1 c :,. -- ..„,' P.-, 7.1.7 I--./ 0 n __co,..,...... , ___,-.,9__, .__. ,... .,...,. __, l_l__, _.x• ., . n...46,7 ,i ?.fi-E.-.7-•,_-. ..,..". -15-th-r ,!... je:',!....",• -_.1 .1 it' -. r I kith - • - "1-1-' 7'N.. .,_. i r. j_- -1-91Najd.T.--_i-e.,... j----•,_.4•1 -:b_4-_ -.--),2-.4-.3.... 7 _L__Te?..c-:- -1-' 40;1 LL.-.. -1"..::7'ii :. .*: 1:1 2 eti.:22 .- 'L.:47th fir-"•:.-t-.7S' 1 P',-"` -7 ''.. 1 .. . - • .. -g• -. •0,22..1'4k - .-...' :-.,z11-1-' --', 4...,.--4. -,--- ,. ., .- -: , ,....,-: .:. -...T9d.-.1-- -.• 4'' .-1-.1 _--2011•,- - 0, L ._.-- V" t 1-1-- , 1 --7---; 7 ' -•1..,_ th, ___ . '.,.. ''. • ' V - ., -- ' ri/H- ; dir' - _•V_72.---Lt.--',.3' . __, -_ , +21 q_ -,' r'.., • •'4%1"' -' _. , -- 3!L---2'. , L...q..-- -7---4--7"zivtL-1'--FTV•••= • :i A. , 4. 0 ,Tr-'3hr-1-'-'.p.'•, --C___--,-- - ik.41.rI_.I.Lc -. - , "-°- Or ' j 1 . .--.-r-r-T 1 711 , -- L.'-'• -r 7 --' - - ..- -,, .^- 1_i _ -re.--•T x •, • -1 . 4.7,k, .,3gir", 1/7. .,-, -I 1, - 1_734111. •- .. 9 lith....15r.17__ ji____-• ii 7 7 , 4 Ij. . ...51,1.- , I i al I -- ,--:- ,-" --UR'. --.4.... ewe Tarre ' , 01 , 6. -, -5 e:.:0-- r ,,, Traffic ''1 -39t15-.-' • •‘' • .0 %. .. li -. r ,. . z - , .. i .40,1 VA. -i ' r -I, e ,-101,-b. - a •E`, . 7ii..-,axi,,,9.,..._ -- ........-.is,- aa Collisions 2 :I r.7" •4i't ---1- .. •-• ;4:1- '- -------;,`, ."'-.''' 014' , 17-11,14d, r.,,...t.:es,:_= :• ...--4 0 Low ifikfr•-R.- .- ._-4...,}-1.0.. ' -TS•cl.h .f..._-.- H---- -, .-, - i. , - t . b--:--. -, ._-1 a - • ''' '- tar . lath_---:-' -_-- • , c 01 4'1'7: 5, „ ----; 1 ,, „ I --,• , Medium Low - - - - •.-'•..-.4giopy..4-...__-_,.1,. 1, ._. „ l' ‘f '' - • L 1-4, .:- rarA,' : ' 0 -d-'Adannor .-...E-3. r. 1 L.--.` .-- 4.:1'1?fj• - CO. 1 X ------ •-. . -, 1 c --1'-,q., ... .„ -... --; £5 1-•-..socii i z -L. t. -A:4:-. r -eu'r-sOre A', I . .1.• .,.4.r , 111111 Medium k-.. A. --,s-„---. to--N- - . ,e-- trc7'°•,,.,i, W'4 -' ' '`o• • ,„' - .-..{.- -. 61... . SidiSi:4Th 4 r ..... r g° • --; 1 I r- a- i.= ..!,, :._ k.- :-,. .. ,,:r i '.'+'''' . Al , ;r. Il= High HT I--'-'"-- --,----7 (... .- R.•-0 • 4- . ' a . a I o.s i i Miles 1 • 2015 MayTraffic Collision Hotspots Map Produced: * 09 Jun 2015 ' TI-14."1 aeratorsAo.+fer-z-�;-' ,--,..• x , • r a% fru. H.II • C+ * c} I,Crank." Z$ Handal-ay - - i i b .g.,boman ' 1'' vvn '-I_ ,�. 1 r. . - UWn=� i �'I- SP 7 i-. _ a * Wabash "'Ir ` G� • .7-13 "e � rJ • O g �, .-r - -. F I� .�1 .L •Out mil-`.r i1 --Farr u J_ � _ v sn4 eser713 - os� .-- rIciri4 IwC � � l ane Y '. . `Lac, __,. — , , "� 1 i - h W Iwosx j EI r y +�. y. ti 3, - 3 5nda}vial k$$ . ai Q G ` rfi�s1 °fin _ SI1 ' o-:-a -- r_05-7.04. .-- = 41 x' Lb r _ _ - C I , � %I a c --___t=114,,,,,;^ _ I I I 1 I 17_,,L_.-73,---: - -- ----1 ` - Kr-Ahead b 4 s. IrL "1 -1 a a __ . 'tam - � / .t-"I ' - �_- T - „ -fir 4 -=�:� -g; V g� 54- — Grata 4 � r# * ';.-.'f - ' -.-SJx, -I- as 1- �3" �3 — x rl� , p.. - i r�+ � .:;kl,1 1 PSoMfN�� _ - .5.46 o -- _ ,•ice 4 ..i` �;.�a5.l,� - tHwd •�d ate' Spoken Malley. —, , yj, '-i -i--7-1- txk' T Ih ofi} '• i.l_ Mansie�d a - i. A,4-: ._1 i' T'LL21 -.l = =1 1 rl 9sl. 1 _ n is a-I _ - er Lake l 4.� Bald. - '. :�� -� T,,2. -. - -- L___ _119.__ ______,____„, �'3oId '-I ° „°a ai'zy r'S==Ip11 °max-_ IL..__ �t; --Aut! -—. r-G n^, T-�- .§:,...4-='----,. _ - R[ J'� . - Ui �,�s Snw - ._ Tf L _ �_ Miss,.1 t I -9:�-s 114 U' .7=J _.11 I w_ s'° -sham- I _'A- • r Benne -11 - _� {- `i.-' - e- _7.7 , -€ '-ni l' - _Desi 1 L_15^:-.9......--- I_^' _1^:-.9 c r. '^' ate-' itclaee' r} �.,o �s {! �.• l - �i. , -. 3 }. i 1- Gd_ _� - v _ -1-_lin - y �Ueyl r. • '$.-- - r ,Mran P:r 'E t -C —r�• _Yoa- o - V -10' '.,�y'.L -��• -z---{r "•_ T'- '^f Broad -7- -- � - �'" -2Si 1 =1Vf" - Alk, �-I--• ,:s�rR= bJ i f� 1�; _ '!_ '--t-- ', [•- : -I E+ -, -o'Obne -" m j T"- r I of - aienray _ _ ', _• �f'- -Ej Ferry_ x : I Std r Att -- �r�' 7 ' Li. -r+l _r I E _ c - •• -- -1 z ,,, - _ r 1 I- �� 1_; i•t Throat L-i ' • ManR --r- IL.- „_ --1 ` �r `o 'T-�`M'�p` I--1 -E.-3rd _r, - ---. -L,_:_+ `� ,, .3.--7 i-I •Y f I �!h T � -Jl 1l „�-t'__,-1-_— :_; U.:A 1_ � ,u j e 1-x-13--1, i r l - Cr- -Z”-y--•=--- -1 {3'__,{ �a�; 2 J. _ ----71-- I -_ a& !e: S w ,_. ,Il we �y`, :s -a; ids' -�1W' f_ 11 c--.� �- ^em . V _`irti 9'f'I= ---rr]eTl I 1{-� NE _ =--i a--I p 1 I �. ��,,•, r }; `s,� i f _ •. I• r IA!bik - T ` _ ... i I. y�i I�d.1 • , -i E�� C� J r- 4 Ei I 4' �. -1��`11Sd1'113f�1 x -i—_ r8 •l d, g� �.. ,g.' `, iS ,al•~ - L';:2i - `' --. S! I- iJ .'_,A r. . :� ,pa • ` - 4 ~ '1?rd__ .33L14- iTJ •' �7 %0.' _ anew 12 - )L•'- ?` — • • .- $27* 6, �, . 4 -3tit '-• I ' ' `i,^•�1I 1c 1L {1.4- - , .--`j e -rte- � a` _ I • •--- -_r - 30 -1 c ip' bttyI,� '--']1114' r"_ i. d I E .E4',7,53;47.11.__9t '3. 1 0 5 •' t-tl5d'- 1 1' 5 '' '1� 7Lti'-41_ - r'�. .b Akha� - --r;.,� I -, - : F E : _e.n �• Y i L l•2-yedl�r 9 o ai' sire r e € F9_.. `3j- ` ,V I _ - s s:-,- �,�G1 � a� Wiy j Commercial `z. • gti.4iiI r- - r !�_ Cdr r, i 1 I..•:.-y • E. ?3 -X5.1, t„ua� 31 Burgl8ries SrhF�Es-- ._ - T _• n ---ji �_i�Fd: �... _ +� •;�' $` i j �'_f,-- 'ru,4 a Cv- �4lb F: --^-- '+y- k,-L. 6ri-q4},Unnc z _ ..-.4 rf`�- c EI h-f f Low y'1, c' Soh"!s 'J• Sl Fth� ___so=s. , ;1 ,n.3Y 70 F. =Ri ,} A I� i msµ_ xy r ; �° Medium SSd1- i .a ... ad r` � I ID d r - �'h.' -1_i;°4, 0. ._ e:4t �a!e*r-'u 1 t 'i1'°`�n�o°k �a' • o 1 A High 7. ]• 'i V _. e -''' •r to a.A _'4 a17, 42.A e.R l` 0 o-S I Miles 2015 May Commercial Burglary Hotspots Mag,llo Produced7 I 1 i2015 * Charge Count from Tickets: Spokane Valley 1600 1400 ♦ +IA& • 12(}0 • ArkillAr 1000 , L 111011 44•ob1 � �C ',. Nrimbh, • 2012 800 2013 • . 2014 -0-2015 600 400 200 -- - 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls 4500 4000 - - — 3500 • 411111114 A 3000 • imam— A 2500 .."°111°,11 .1 -44111111411%44 '‘41111, 2012 2013 2014 2000 I —0-2015 1500 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC SPOKANE VALLEY TRAFFIC COLLISIONS 140 120 A • AL Aggigik10080 �,�,� A 4.411WA _ ,A1PI.Af 411161WW rior, 2012 -0-.2013 A 60 -0-2015 40 20 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Person Crimes 400 350 , 300 • • 250 t"`.- '~ 2012 • 200 NPPIPF • —N—zala 2ai4 —0—2015 150 - 100 50 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Property Crimes 900 800 Al 700 ► A A. INV, • • e""-- 500 500 —.-2012 12013 ---2014 400 —0—2015 300 200 100 0 - JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents 2500 2000 . • /S\ 41111k111"..FreolOPOI6.140r 1500 -3-2012 -•M2013 --2014 -0-2015 1000 500 0 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC Spokane Valley Sex Crimes 50 45 x 1 : . aPiiih,. ..4. A4lik- Iliiik,„ 30 2012 25 ll .0,_ A # / -o A A - .-0. .2413 x Ale ' ,',-.1.=.2014x -0-2015 20 I 15IF f 10 5 0 - JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC oOkane Valley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT May 2015 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Total %of Contract Name Contractor Expended as Contract Amount of 5/31/15 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $384,409.22 28.13% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $276,036.13 56.31% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $99,685.65 52.47% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $40,000.00 $5,792.62 14.48% Landscaping Senske $53,250.00 $6,431.41 0.00% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $2,949.05 29.49% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $19,531.62 32.55% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00 $69,874.13 26.37% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $582,000.00 $93,194.77** 16.01% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00* $2,915.00 14.58% * Budget estimates ** Does not include April or May 2015—waiting on invoices Citizen Requests for Public Works 60 50 I 40 20 10 ME. . . . . . . . . . . . II Total Citizen Sign& Storm Requests: Misc Landscapi Roadway Pothole Signal Drainage/ Traffic Public Requests ng Hazard Requests Requests Erosion Requests Works ■Submitted 53 5 5 9 4 8 4 18 ■In Progress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •Resolved 53 5 5 9 4 8 4 18 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.gov/geographic/spokane/spokane rive r basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for May 2015: • AAA Sweeping continued arterial maintenance sweeping. • AAA Sweeping continued residential sweeping. (80% Complete). • AAA Sweeping continued vactor operations (drywells, catchbasins and swale inlets) • Poe Asphalt Maintenance Contract— Cat's eye began stormwater projects. • The Geiger crew mowed dryland grass locations and disposed of 4,400 lbs. of litter and debris from our rights of way. STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for May 2015: • Continued work on update and development of Stormwater Capital projects list for 2016- 2021 • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, (see below). TRAFFIC CIP Projects Staff continues to coordinate with traffic related design and study items as part of CIP projects. Staff is in the process of finalizing quantities for a portion of the Citywide Safety Project. Specific Studies Staff is coordinating with the consultant to wrap up the University Overpass Study. Staff obtained the finalized Sullivan Road Corridor Study for review, and will wrap up in early June. Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering with the Comprehensive Plan Update. *Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS `"'"` 00Km, le "' Public Works Projects Millet' Monthly Summary-Design &Construction May-2015 Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open %Complete Construction Project # Design&Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 FHWA-BR 06/27/14 07/18/14 100 11 09/30/16 $15,833,333 0156 Mansfield Ave Connection FHWA-CMAQ 06/05/15 06/19/15 100 0 10/31/15 $ 2,002,350 0166 Pines Rd.(SR27)&Grace Ave.Int Safety HSIP 10/02/15 10/23/15 85 0 05/31/16 $ 722,795 0201 ITS Infill Project-Phase 1 FHWA-CMAQ 06/30/15 09/04/15 5 0 12/31/16 $ 327,562 0206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project CDBG 7/10/2015 7/31/2015 60 0 09/25/15 $ 365,227 Street Preservation Projects 0188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project FHWA-STP(U) 04/10/15 05/01/15 100 0 10/31/15 $ 1,156,500 0211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley&Wellesley COSY 03/27/15 04/15/15 100 0 07/30/15 $ 628,703 0218 Montgomery Ave St Preservation COSV 05/22/15 06/05/15 99 0 10/31/15 $ 285,890 0220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation COSY 04/17/15 05/29/15 100 0 10/31/15 $ 316,965 0224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation Project COSY 07/03/15 07/17/15 0 0 10/31/15 $ 515,290 Traffic Projects 0060 Argonne Road Corridor Upgrade(SRTC 06-3)FHWA-CMAQ 11/07/14 12/05/14 100 25 08/31/15 $ 1,721,880 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements HSIP 06/25/15 07/10/15 95 0 12/31/15 $ 474,580 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates HSIP tbd tbd 0 0 tbd $ 81,000 Stormwater Projects 0197 Broadway,Havana to Fancher SD Retrofit Dept of Ecology 04/10/15 04/27/15 100 15 07/31/15 $ 661,609 Other Projects 0176 ApplewayTrail COSY 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 98 05/30/15 $ 1,605,400 Total $26,699,084 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Complete Open %Complete Construction Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date Date PE Completion Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave-Flora to Barker FHWA-STP(U) 08/15/15 11 $ 517,919 0141 Sullivan&Euclid PCC FHWA-STP(U) 12/31/17 90 $ 175,260 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan FHWA-STP(U) 09/30/15 90 $ 276,301 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement COSY 12/31/15 8 $ 51,619 0221 McDonald Rd Diet(16th to Mission) HSIP 06/30/15 0 $ 616,000 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF&Trent COSY tbd 0 $ 10,000 Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study FHWA-CMAQ 06/30/15 98 $ 249,711 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study FHWA-STP(U) 06/30/15 90 $ 200,000 Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study Dept of Ecology 06/30/15 80 $ 300,000 0198 Sprague,Park to University LID Dept of Ecology 03/01/16 30 $ 20,000 0199 Havana-Yale Diversion Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 35 $ 20,000 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 35 $ 20,000 Total $ 2,456,810 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 PLANNING Proposed Draft 2016-2021 Six-Year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) A Proposed Draft of The Six-Year TIP was presented to the City Council on May 5, 2015. From comments received from that meeting staff updated the project list by adding projects that are Developer Driven and projects identified in the University Rd Overpass Study and the Sullivan Rd Corridor Traffic Study. A public hearing for the Six-Year TIP will be held June 9, 2015. Staff will work with the City Council to adopt a final plan by the end of June. The State requires the City to submit its final TIP to WSDOT by July 1, 2015. GRANTS 2018-2020 CMAQ and TAP Call for Projects Results are pending for the grant applications submitted to SRTC on April 30, 2015. Preliminary scoring results indicate that the projects highlighted below are above the funding cutoff line and have a very good chance of receiving the funds applied for: Congestions Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ): Project Name Grant City Match & Total Project Request Other Available Cost Funding Apple way Trail— Evergreen to Sullivan $1,422,925 $222,075 $1,645,000 Apple way Trail— University to Balfour Park (CN $449,800 $70,200 $520,000 Only) Evergreen & Broadway ITS $1,617,550 $252,450 $1,870,000 Sullivan— Wellesley Intersection Improvement $1,085,425 $284,575* $1,370,000 Project TOTAL $4,575,700 $829,300 $5,405,000 (* includes Spokane County contribution of$99,625) Transportation Alternatives (TA): Project Name Grant City Match & Total Project Request Other Available Cost Funding Apple way Trail— University to Balfour Park (PE& $198,950 $31,050 $230,000 ROW Only) Opportunity Elementary— SRTS Sidewalk Project $432,500 $67,500 $500,000 TOTAL $631,450 $98,550 $730,000 Grand TOTAL $5,207,150 $927,850 $6,135,000 The SRTC Board will approve and prioritize the list of CMAQ and TAP projects on July 9, 2015. *Information in bold indicates updates 4