ZE-0003A-98
- RECE VEE) 4-
fSPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER SEP. 2 7-2001
SPOKAAIE CpUMyENMNEER
RE: Change of Conditions to a Prior Zone )
Reclassification, in the Urban ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) Zone; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Applicant: Greg Ripley ) AND DECISION
File No. ZE-3A-98 )
)
This matter coming on for public hearing on August 1, 2001, the Hearing Examiner, after
review of the change of conditions application and the entire record, and finding good cause
therefore, hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision:
1. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The application requests a change of conditions to a prior zone reclassification, in the
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, to allow modifications to the original site plan of record,
and to update the conditions of approval.
2. The site is generally located east of and adjacent to the centerline of vacated Havana Street,
northeast of Pratt Avenue, in the SW '/4 of Section 23, Township 25 North, Range 43 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
3. The site is currently designated as County Assessor's tax parcel no. 35233.9185, and has a
mailing address of 4249 East Pratt Avenue.
4. The site owner is Pratt Avenue Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, a non-profit
corporation, 4249 East Pratt Avenue, Spokane, WA 99202.
5. The applicant for the proposal is Gregory R. Ripley, Sr., 4104 East Pratt Avenue, Spokane,
WA 99202.
6. The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Hearing Examiner
Ordinance (County Resolurion No. 96-0171) and the County Hearing Examiner Rules of
Procedure (County Resolution No. 96-0294).
7. The requirements for public notice have been met.
8. A public hearing was held on the proposed change of conditions on August 1, 2001.
9. The following persons testified at the public hearing:
Tarnrriy Jones Greg Ripley
Division of Planning 4104 East Pratt Avenue
1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99202
Spokane, WA 99260-0240
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 1
v
10. The County Division of Planning issued a Detemunation of Nonsignificance for the
proposal on July 13, 2001.
11. The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County Comprehensive Plan, the County Zon.ing
Code, other applicable development regulations, and previous land use decisions for the site and
in the vicinity. 12. The record includes the documents in File Nos. ZE-3-98 and ZE-3A-98 at the time of the
public hearing; the documents submitted at the public hearing; and the items taken notice of by
the Examiner.
13. The site is approximately .5 acres in size, and irregular in shape. The subject property
slopes slightly from west to east, and includes some landscaping and a driveway associated with
a church located west of the site. Some pine trees are found on the southeasterly portion of the
property. A 6-foot high cyclone fence is located along the east perimeter of the site.
14. A.64-acre parcel improved with a 2,080 square foot church, on land owned by the owner
of the current site, abuts the northerly two-thirds of the current site on the west. The southwest
comer of the parcel touches Pratt Avenue.
15. On February 29, 2000, the Hearing Examiner approved a rezone of the current site from the
Mining (MZ) zone to the UR-3.5 zone, to provide landscaping, parking and drainage facilities for
the adjacent church. See Hearing Examiner decision in File No. ZE-3-98.
16. The change of conditions application proposes significant modifications to the site plan of
record for the 2000 rezone decision involving the site, to allow the construction of a new church
on the site and the adjacent parcel to the west. The site plan of record dated September 22, 2000
illustrates parking and a future addition to the new church on the current site. The church
building on the paxcel to the west would be removed, and parking and drainage for the church
installed on such adjacent parcel.
17. Havana Street and Pratt Avenue converge immediately south of the site. Havana Street is
considered a Local Access road under the County Arterial Road Plan, while Pratt Avenue is in
the City of Spokane. The city of Spokane lies immediately west of the site. The site is located
along the east edge of the South Hill area of the City.
18. An abandoned surface mine lies immediately east of the site and other lots lying along the
east side of Havana Street. A cyclone fence separates the mine from such properties, with the
mining pit dropping off steeply a few feet from the fence. The surrounding area otherwise
consists of single-family residences at urban densities, and vacant undeveloped parcels. A
single-family residence was recently constructed on the lot lying immediately south of the
subject property, pursuant to a rezone to the UR-3.5 zone approved by the Hearing Examiner in
1997, in File No. ZE-25-97.
19. The site is designated in the Urban category of the County Generalized Comprehensive
Plan. The subject property also lies inside the Aquifer Sensitive Area, Priority Sewer Service
Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the Generalized Comprehensive Plan.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 2
~
20. The site is located inside the interim urban growth area boundaries desigaated by the
County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act.
21. The site is located in an area regulated by the Glenrose/Central Park Stormwater Ordinance,
adopted by County Resolution No. 99-1046. The project will be required to comply with such
regulation.
22. The City of Spokane indicated that it had several concerns with site development, including
street, water, sewer and stormwater. The City indicated that these issues could be dealt with at
the building permit stage, and did not oppose the proposal.
23. No neighboring property owners or public agencies expressed opposition to the proposal,
as conditioned. Tbe project, as conditioned, is compatible with neighboring land uses.
24. The proposal will remain subject to the conditions of approval imposed in File No.
ZE-3-98, except for the new conditions recommended by public agencies.
25. The proposal, as conditioned, will not have a significant impact on the environment or
impact neighboring properties.
26. The Staff Report adequately analyzes the consistency of the proj ect with the
Comprehensive Plan, the development standards of the UR-3.5 zone, and the criteria for
approving a change of conditions. Such analysis is hereby adopted and incorporated by reference
as findings of fact herein.
Based on the above findings of fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following:
U. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
1. The proposed change of conditions, as conditioned, generally conforms to the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The applicant has established that the proposal bears a substantial relationship to, and/or
will not be detrimental to, the public health, safety or welfare.
3. The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local
Environmental Ordinance have been met.
4. The proposal, as conditioned, complies with the UR-3.5 zone, the County Zoning Code,
and other applicable development regulations.
5. The proposed change of conditions meets the criteria established in Section 14.504.040 of
the County Zoning Code for a change of conditions application.
6. Approval of the land use application is appropriate under the criteria established for the
approval of land use applications in Section 11 of the County Hearing Examiner Ordinance,
adopted by County Resolution No. 96-0171.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 3
V
.
III. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law above, the above application for a
change of conditions application is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various
public agencies specified below.
Any changes to pubic agency conditions added or significantly altered by the Examiner are
italicized.
Fa.ilure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant",
which term shall include the owners, developers and users of the property, and their heirs,
assigns and successors.
2. The Change of Conditions applies to the following real property: That portion of the NW
'/4 of the SW '/4 of Section 23, T. 25N., R. 43E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, described as
follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the NW '/a of the SW '/4 of said Section 23; thence
N.00 05'45"W., along the West line of said Section 23, 281.97 feet; thence 5.88 34'40"E., 50.68
feet; thence 5.22 01' 12"E., 155.21 feet; thence S.50 02'09"E., 47.61 feet; thence 5.52 05'45"E.,
29.27 feet; thence N.89 34'56"W., 108.12 feet; thence 5.00 05'45"E., 89.49 feet, to the south
line of the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 of said Section 23; thence N.89 34'56"W., along South line,
60.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Except that portion lying within Havana Road.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, the Aquifer
Sensitive Overlay zone, and all other applicable provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code,
as amended.
4. The applicant shall develop the subject property substantially in conformance with the site
plan of record dated September 22, 2000, subject to the conditions of approval herein and
compliance wit,h development regulations. Minor variations may be approved by the Director of
the Division of Planning/designee under the criteria specified in Section 14.504.040 of the
Spokane County Zoning Code, subject to compliance with regulation standards and conditions of
approval. Any other modification must be presented through the submittal of a change of
conditions application to the Hearing Examiner for review and approval at a public hearing.
5. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee'of a specific
lighting and signing plan for the subject property prior to the release of any building pertnit.
6. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 4
♦
:
7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond
or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any building pernuts. Landscaping
shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
8. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice, noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed
as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the
conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of Planning. Tbe Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subj ect of a land use action
by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on September 27, 2001, approving a change of
conditions application and imposing a variety of special development conditions. File No.
ZE-3A-98 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1. The applicant shall contact the Division of Building and Code Enforcement at the earliest
possible stage in order to be informed of code requirements administered/enforced as authorized
by the State Building Code Act. Design/development concerns include addressing, fire apparatus
access roads, fire hydrant flow, approved water systems, building accessibility, construction type,
occupancy classification, existing exterior wall protection and energy code requirements.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed, the following conditions shall
be complied with:
1. Any required access permits and improvements to Pratt Avenue must be approved by the
City of Spokane.
2. The applicant shall submit drainage and access plans for the review and approval of the
Spokane County Engineer. Because this proposal is located in a joint planning area with the City
of Spokane under the State Growth Management Act, the applicant is advised to consult with the
City of Spokane to ensure that the drainage and access plans conform to adopted city standards.
3. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and other applicable County standards andlor
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
4. The proposed change of conditions shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane
County Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads, approaches,
drainage and fees in new construction.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 5
~
r
♦
5. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside for future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the City of Spokane Public Works.
2. Water service shall be coordinated through the City of Spokane Public Works.
3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
4. A public sewer system shall be made available for the project and individual service
provided to the lot. The use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system shall not be
authorized.
5. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited.
CITY OF SPOKANE WATER AND HYDROELECTRIC SERVICES
1. An on-site water plan will need to be developed. The water plan must address domestic,
irrigation, and fire flows for the project. The fire district has the authority to determine the fire
flow requirement. The City's Water Department reserves the right to increase the fire flow.
2. City of Spokane Design Standards shall be utilized both in the development of the water
plan and the installation of the water facilities.
3. The water plan must be reviewed and approved by the City of Spokane prior to the
initiation of water service. -
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 6
f
~
DATED this 27" day of September, 2001
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMTNER
Michaet C. Dempsey, WSBA #823!~
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0171, the decision of the Hearing Examiner
on an application for a conditional use permit is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one
(21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land
use petition in superior court pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW. Pursuant to chapter 36.70C
RCW, the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is mailed.
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant, and by first class mail to
other parties of record, on September 27, 2001. The date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's
decision is therefore October l, 2001, counting to the next business day when the last day for
mailing falls on a weekend or holiday. THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS
DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS OCTOBER 22, 2001.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal
period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be
inspected Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and
5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by
Spokane County.
Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130, affected property owners may request a change in valuation
for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-3A-98 Page 7
Pr()jcct titacus Artivc Li.GINEER'S REVIEW SHE1:.,o
_ As Built Pt~~ x~~~ivca Rezone F'iie ZE-0003A-98 -Qs
RusJ Plons Approvcd (:'ompt►mun filcs:
yew Road Stbndards 5- I S-9S Myiar N:
Rrlatrd FilrS
Hrnring: 08101/2001 IO:ZO Building I)ept:
Techniral Rrview: lU!19/2l1(H) 1.15 ' Hmard U Ytan
f'neiirmnary Rrview- T)+Pc: ~ Large Lot E31dg. Squorr Feet
Oatc Rrrrivrkl M03.'2000
No. Lots: Na. Acn:
ProLlect Name L'R-3.5 CHG OF ('O`D CHj,rRCN tiIYGDONT HSt.L _ I
:;ise Addras 5 tia i'Fi. F- ~iAVA":A. N. Pi2ATT, PRATT E. 4104
Appllcant [t~ngc-Township-Scction- 43 - 25 - 23 NARCF_I(S): {first 21, C;r~g Ripley Conctitians tiiailcii: 7 O~ 35233_9185
KINCaWM tiALL OF JEHUVAH wt'rNFSS F'icxod 7.nnr Nu
4 104 C. PT'dti Av W31Ci SOUTcC 1- -
SF'l)KANE. WA 99202 Sewer Snurcc
Yhonr (509) 535-2tOl? Schaul Dist
rax r4c oQ) =-14 -6c,3 , r•in niSc
~
I
'i=n~~:ncrr -i%?-+t~l~(.'onlact liiP IANiMl' J~►til_> _ Cuutact Li3k
Date Submitted Descrion _ [nitials
Eng Necd T+cchnicmily Compiete Eng i+lecd Harvard [ic1 Mitigation
Eng Ncrr.cll Drninagc Plans Eng Nced TrafCic Analyiis Eng Tvccd Othct
Eng Agrec i'ay Fecs Received Eng Fina! Plat Fres Compictcd
Copy ta Accounpng
Eng Agme Yrioriry Pccs Ttecrivcd 09-'2 9r2000 F..ng Prelim Plai Fccs Camplcted
hovice w!'uhtic / Tioticr to f'ubhc # 1 3 4 b Ccimpletec! -~N I~rtds to be ni,grtcd
!>C~i~r~ I)c'.t;it;n l?afc~ 1{ri-1 ~uti
Of1l qUQ(1[iC5 Of
df'li ifl3gC 11CRi Ca1CUl8lCd
Hcarfng Tkrtc Drtisian App Dcn Cond Appld RCC
:lppcalcd ta B(,'C Uccision App Ucn Cond Appld Court
Appealed W CouR Drcision App Dan Cond Appld
~ Stamped tiiyinrs to Secretnry (Sandy)
titumpet9 '08 Loc Planc to Srrretmy (Santiy )
I
J
, i~.iiGINEER'S'REVIEVV SHEL,
As aL;lt Ptans K«~ivcd Rezone File ZE-0003A-98
-y~
F{nad Plans .lpproved
C'umpanion Filc~
yewEinad tit:usdard, 5-15-t)5 ivlylar
ltclated I• ~1~ :
Firnring: fWiiding I-)cl)t
1 cchnical Rcvicw: 10/19/2000 1
Preliminary Review: ~•Pc k4f, ~'L;.,;,r:
UaZC RcCetvcd' I0103/.1.0011 '1w l IAS .'`o.
Project Name t1R-3.5 CHG OF CUiVU CfIURCH K[NGDUr1 H*..L
ille Adaress s asTri. E. ftnvANA. N. }'!tA C'1. PRATT 1 . -41,04
:%pplicnut PARC'F.L(S): (first 20)
(;rcg Ripicy CnndiUcros hiatlcd' 35233.9165
KINGDOy1 NALL UF 1EHOVAH 1Vfi'NL•5S Flood l,one No
'l 0A E- Yratl Av Watcr Source
S!'UKANC. tiVA 99-102
Sewrt Sourre
Phunc Fax Schoal f>>;~
~ {Un) 535_2 100 (4509) 534-6636 Firc i)W
-:17-111l5 <'ontaci 1'AA1MY Jc);~(VS
1)ate Submitted Description Initials
E=ng Nrtd Tcctwtcully Canipletc Cng Nccd }inrvard Rd !vfitigation
[:ng Nccd Drainage Plans rng Nred Trufrt'EC Anniysis Eng Need Other
L;; e Agrcc Pay Fees Reccivtd Eng rinnl Plut Fers C urnpletec!
Ct'Pi' to Accounting
i:.t:g Agrec I'nunty Fccs Recrivcd 0912912000 Lng Prelim Plat Fces Completcd
yuticr tu Pub[i: ' Noticc w!'ublic u 1 3 4 G ('ompirtcd O[ NCCdS lP bC 51$ttCtl
~ter~ 1)c:s isti~~t~ I1.alc~ ; IT,-O~;I1 I
■
oit yuauttcs
• ' cira+nage itcm c3iculatrd
Firsrin~ U;~t•. 1?:~:•,i.~n ~pp Iirn i."n:tci •\rpi<I fit'1 -
,1rpca!cd to li('(' i APp [hn Cund :1p47;d 1. uurt
Appr,alrJ to CoUn [?ccision App Dcn (;ond Appici
' INwrnpnci h1r•lurs to Sccrctary (Sandy)
StanTpcd ?Qg (,i.st Plans lu Sccrctirv {tiund} i
I
i
I
1
. , ~~l
,
C
. '
~
STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE ZE•3A-98
rr~~
DIVISION OF Pl_ANNING
SPOKAINkE COUI\UY
HEARING DATE: August 1, 2001 @ 10:30 a.m. FILE ZE-3A-98
PROJECT PLANNER: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
zone to allow construction of a church.
Project Data
Project Location: , Generally located north of and adjacent to the
terminus of Havana Street and east of Pratt Avenue
in the SW1/4 of Section 23, Township 25 N., Range
43 EWM, Spokane County, WA.
Parcel Number(s) 35233.9185
ApplicantlOwner: Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses
c/o Greg Ripley
- 4104 E. Pratt Ave.
Spokane, WA. 99202
(509)475-4484
Comprehensive Plan Designation: ~ Urban
Zoning: ~ Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
Existing Land Use: ~ Vacant and undeveloped land
Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses: - -
• North: . Zoning to the north of the site consists of Mining (MZ)
established in 1958 (ZE-44-58). Land use to the
. north of the site consists of vacant, undeveloped
land.
• South: Zoning to the south of the site consists of Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 1997 (ZE-25-
97C), previously classified as Mining in 1958 (ZE-44-
, 58). Land use to the south of the site is single family
- ~ residential.
• East: . Zvning to the east of the site consists of Mining (MZ)
established in 1958 (ZE-44-58). Land use to the east
of the site consists of vacant, undeveloped land and
former rock quarry.
• West: Properties located west of the site are located within
_ the City of Spokane and are zoned for residential
- uses. Land use to the west of the site is single family
residential.
Known Land Use Proposals-and Recent land use approvals in the area include:
ZE-3A-98
Staff Report - August 1, 2001 Hearing
1 of 5
f e Recent Project Approvals in the
Area of this Project ZE-25-97; a zone reclassification from Mining (MZ) to
_ Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), located south of and
adjacent to the subject property, approved by the
Hearing Examiner on July 14, 1997.
Land Oivision Status: The subject property is a tax parcel of record and
was aggregated to the property adjacent to the west
of the site and located within the City of Spokane
(see CE-456-98).
Water Purveyor: City of Spokane
Sewage Disposal: City of Spokane
Fire District Spokane County Fire District #1
Nearest Arterial and Distance: The site is located at the terminus of Havana Street
- and adjacent to Pratt Avenue. The Spokane County
Arterial Road Plan identifies Havana Street as a
Local Access street. Pratt Avenue is located within
the City of Spokane.
Neighborhood Association: None known
• This proposal is located inside the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA).
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA).
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area: - The subject property is located within the
Prioriry Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone.
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas,, None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Areas Maps.
Floodplain - - The site is located outside of the 100-year
" flood plain.
Geologically-Hazardous Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
- . • - - Critical Areas Maps.
Wetlands None illustrated on the Spokane County
- Critical Areas Maps.
SEPA
A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on July 13, 2001, with a comment period
ending on July 30, 2001.
Noticinq
Published: The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on
July 13, 2001.
Mailing Deadline: The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers of land within 400 feet of the
site was July 16, 2001.
Site Posting Deadline: The deadline for posting notice on the site was July 16, 2001.
1724 Compliance Dates
Application Accepted: September 25, 2000
Technically Complete / Determination of Completeness issued: June 13, 2001
ZE-3A•98
Staff Report - August 1, 2001 Hearing
2 of 5
w ~
Date Notice of Decision is Due: October 11, 2001
Reviewin4 Aqencies
11 agencies were notified on October 3, 2000, and July 3, 2001. Comments were due on October 19, 2000,
and July 18, 2001.
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date
Received Received Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes 7/18/01 Spokane Regional Yes 7/18/01
of Engineering, Health District
Transportation
Spokane County Division Yes 7/18/01 Spokane County Fire Yes 10/17/00
of Engineering, Protection District #1
Development Services
Spokane County Division No City of Spokane Yes 6/13/01
of Utilities Developer Services
Spokane County Division Yes 10/19/00 City of Spokane Water Yes 7/16/01
of Utilities, Water and Hydroelectric
Resources Services
City of Spokane Planning No City of Spokane Yes 12/13/00
Services Transportation Services
Spokane County Division No
of Building and Code
Enforcement
Aqency Comments:
Agency comments are in the form of recommended conditions of approval.
Responses from the Public:
No comments have been received from the public.
Description of the Site:
The site is approximately '/2 acre in size, is undeveloped and is located along the east edge of the South Hill,
adjacent to the City of Spokane. The site slopes slightly from west to east and contains some landscaping.
A six foot high cyclone fence is located along the eastern boundary of the site. The site is currently used as
an overflow parking area for the church located adjacent to the west. The site of the adjacent church is
located within the City of Spokane. Surrounding uses are primarily single family residential, undeveloped
land and a former rock quarry.
Backaround:
The application for the proposed Change of Conditions was submitted on September 25, 2000. A Technical
Review meeting was held on October 19, 2000. The application was determined to be Technically Complete
on June 13, 2001, and the Notice of Application was circulated at that time with a comment period ending on
June 27, 2001.
A zone reclassification, ZE-3-98, from Mining (MZ) to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) for the development of
a parking area for an adjacent church was approved by the Hearing Examiner on February 29, 2000, for the
subject site. The requested Change of Conditions applies to the following condition of approval:
DIVISION OF PLANNING CONDITION #4: The applicant shall develop the subject property in accordance
with the site plan of record dated June 9, 1987. Minor revisions may be approved administratively by the
Director/designee of the Division of Current Planning, pursuant to Section 14.504.040 of the Spokane
County Zoning Code. Such revisions must conform to regulation standards and the conditions of approval.
All other modifications must be submitted for the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to a
change of conditions application. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
ZE-3A-98
Staff Report - August 1, 2001 Hearing
3 of 5
t' Y
The purpose of the requested change of conditions is to allow modifications to the original site plan of record
to allow the construction of a church on the subject site that will replace the existing church Iocated to the
west. Required parking and drainage areas will be located on the site of the existing church.
The subject property has been aggregated through a lot line adjustment with the property on which the
existing church is located and approved by the Spokane County Division of Planning and the City of
Spokane Planning Services (see CE-456-98), however, the property will continue to be identified by
separate tax parcel numbers since each parcel is located within a separate taxing district.
Staff Analvsis:
Comprehensive Plan:
The subject property is located within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban category
is intended to provide the opportunity for the development of a"citylike" environment, which includes various
land uses, residential development and a high level of public facilities and urban services. It is primarily a
residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-family and condominium buildings along with
neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and recreational facilities.
Objective 1.1 a promotes fill-in within established development areas where community facilities have
already been established. Decision Guideline 1.1.1 states that "Urban development will be approved in
areas having adequate power supplies, water, sanitary and storm sewers... City of Spokane water and
sewer services are available to the site. Decision Guidelines 1.5.1 states that "Buffering and/or landscaping
will be used to mitigate the differences between proposed developments and existing uses". A 10' wide strip
of Type I landscaping will be provided along the south property line in order to buffer existing residential
uses located south of the site. Objectives 1.5.e recommends that when a neighborhood experiences
pressure for a change in character, such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review.
Decision Guideline 1.5.8 recommends that when determining whether a proposal will change the character
of an existing neighborhood, both the height and design of the proposed structure be considered.
The site is also located within the Spokane City Fringe Area. The Fringe Area policies indicate that the
Comprehensive Plan should be used as a primary tool for guiding development, and encourage growth and
revitalization of portions of the Fringe Area that have already experienced development. Decision Guideline
30.1.4 states that urbanization of vacant urban areas should be permitted when consistent with City and
County Plan policies relating to utility services, open space, and alternative living environments.
The proposed zone reclassification is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision Guidelines of the
Urban category and Spokane City Fringe Area Sections of the Comprehensive Plan.
Zoning:
The existing zoning of the site is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) established in 2000 (ZE-3-98), and
previously classified as Mining (MZ) in 1958 (ZE-44-58). The purpose of the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5)
zone is to implement the lower density range of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The intent
is to promote areas of primarily single-family residential use in an urbanized neighborhood setting, having a
high level of public services. Lots shall be served by a public water system and shall require connection to a
public sewer system when available. Roadways shall be paved and curbed and may have sidewalks. The
site is located adjacent to the City of Spokane and is within an established residential neighborhood. The
proposed church is an allowed use within the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone.
Site Plan:
The site plan of record illustrates a proposed church, approximately 3696 square feet in size, a future 1764
square foot addition, parking and drainage areas, and landscaping along the south side yard property line.
Access to the site is from Pratt Avenue. The site plan illustrates that the northwest corner of the proposed
building will be located on the adjacent parcel and within the City of Spokane. The subject site and adjacent
parcel have been aggregated through an approved Certificate of Exemption (CE-456-98). Building permit
ZE-3A-98
Staff Report - August 1, 2001 Hearing
4of5
review will be coordinated through the Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement and the
City of Spokane Building Services. Detailed site plan review to determine compliance with the applicable
development standards of the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) is recommended to occur administratively.
Site Plan Data
Proposed use - Church with 128 seat auditorium, two (2) classrooms and future addition
Proposed Required/Allowed
Building Coverage 28% 50%
Landscaping
North property line None None required
South property line 10' Type I 10' Type I
Building setbacks
Front yard 60' from property line 25' from property line
Side yard 5 feet minimum 5 feet minimum
Rear yard 20 feet minimum 20 feet minimum
Parking 32 minimum 32 minimum
(not including future addition)
Staff Summarv:
The proposed Change of Conditions is generally consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Decision
Guidelines of the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan and the development standards of the existing
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone.
Attachments:
A. Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Development Plan
• Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning
6. Agency and Public Comments
C. Conditions of Approval
ZE-3A-98
Staff Report - August 1, 2001 Hearing
5of5
. ►
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS ~
VICINITY MAP
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
~
.
Z , . Map
• ,n~ty ~ ~ ~
Y ~T ~ •p t1d
~ ~ v,~~~r w°r a"`• ~.s"`° r •
Jy M~~
G
A
W
~ 1$
4th
~
1 I ~ 1 ~
•r~, ir ~J
~C4 O v
't Qd `~.t7
1
v ~ .
~X
1
t
i~
L -
~ -
^ u
~ t u
►5~ a ~
V
0
i 1~pr1• y~ a
.Y ~
` ' o~ ~4c , y 21 r '
25th
' L
Tith- - ~
' ~wowo
~
~
3}` ~ 36
~
G~n~ r
- 36
.
-
owo
►-wo ►cin+tY MaP
09126100
..1667 ft trourec~d)
; ~ irx~
Sca%P-
N~
~ n.
22'
N_89_Q6' W, EA51 ,
~ -'1 r , . - • -•--•--•------r--•--.-~._ '
r. , ~ 3000' ~/5,~, ~ t ~',~r'~~~'~'' ~ ~ 20,
24' ~ 32 lb
17
Wf # ~vit, a~ i9 ~p(~ Oi.n~OCK •r''"~o~
28 20
.1/fib~ ~15 ~O, ~ Q~ .
~ ~ 7 n ~ ` ~
XISfING
5 65'02' r~
2~ 19 I O
F~. . . I ~
I /
i ; " ! Ai, t'~C.y._ J 16qN, 89' 46'W, 20a,55' ~ \ i
. ~ I
PP,1ff AVE Nt ~ i
12' NC~
io 9 8 r 6 5 q 3 s i
, .
o0000
-~0000000000
\
WOPOSEDFW-ECf ~
8 PP"G
gfNUING WN,L
FU(lg AVGIfION
8PAUG
205 lM1P%All
mOrrIm 6NE
FENCE
rzcutraae, ~ ~~oaroraws, ~
lR 3,5 I 2EC1A55 f0 O.lLb I rnsaoK
DuIIDVJG NJFOpJMAfiON: NM KINGnOM NAII
pEP, aNf 0F OUL QNG COVE',Aa; 20 i -287.
MLDWGu5e(5); DW EI711CAtI0N 4249 MArf AV~.
`AW5WE19 *\EA5: 526850,fr, SpOKAN~ WA~ 99202
fYpE 0~ IPNDSUV'ING, tYPE I
N0. 0f PfMING SPACES nE0M0; 32
PERCENIOF OPEN SPALE ( El(Q.UVc pAVED 24 % FkAff AVNUE KINGIXIM }-W.l 9 XIVVAN'S WIiNC55E5
VI11U7WG 5Eit3AGK5: 5' S1VE147, / 20' DACK YD. DAiE; 9122100 1 5CAl.E ; Nt5 I WANdJ 6Y ; NH
1 ~
ZE-03A-98
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Vall
~i ~ ~ ~ ♦ ~ I 1
✓ • ~
.
~
.
\
` \ a
PTM-fm
~ 1111 ~
_ LLLLLLLt,L~ 10
I J
Wh 11 1 IT t
EL-M
FT= m~ 1- nT
FIF
,
.
.
~ ~ -
~
23
P F~ r-j
~ HIEH~
~
/ -
.~~a.
vvlw
r
I po_
~ \
~
.
~ , .
.
.
.
.
. ~
' I
.
.
•
Scale :1 inch - 1250 ft(rounded) 09/26/00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Subject Property within IUGA. AA.A -A" Subject Property within UTA.
Subject Property within PSSA. Subject Property within ASA.
r ZE-03A-98
Existing Zoning
R-3.5 238 4 UR•3 38 49
\\\\N~ 1~R~88C 9 -
\ \ ~ (
\~~~\~~~~i ~.52~ R-3 52~ 4~ - - -L
~N\~
N~ ~ T~-3.52384;i- - -3.52 4~ -
R-3.523849
\~\N~\~ 2 4 ~J-5 \\N\\\~~
N UR-15~2384
UR- 5 2 C
~ MZ 44 58
~ \
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •
ssc
7c
-3.5445 UR- 5 45
` ~
R-3.5445 R- 458
~N~~~~\~~\~~ ~ 23 ~ U 5
J~3.54 5 l1R- 5 458
UR- 5 458 'IR
R-3. 44 5 - 5 5
5----
~ 8 • 5 5
~\N~~~\\\\N\~~\N.
. _ ~
~ . ,
Arjj
\ 4 3 5 4 iR•3. 44 5 - 5 5
~ \ 1 - 5 5 .
$
~ . i . . -
ib
\
3.54459
UR-3.54458
26 i I
~
` `
~ N
N~~
~ N`.54 5
N IN u • .
.
Scale : 1 inch - 500 ft(rounded) 09/26/00 Exisring Zoning
I
. +
ATTACHMENT 11
AGENCY COMMENTS
. t ~
Jones, Tammy
From: Hansen, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:10 AM
To: Jones, Tammy
Cc: Hohman, John; Brown, Eldon
Subject: Pratt and Havana - Ripley project
Tammy,
This memo is in response to your voice message of June 12 concerning the proposed land use
action for the site lying north of the Pratt and Havana intersection. I have been in
contact with John Hohman in the county engineering department on several occasions
concerning this site. As you know, the ownership lies both within the county and city. We
have several concerns with the site including street, water, sewer and stormwater which
will need to be resolved prior to the city issuing any permit for city services. Also, we
(the city) has agreed to take the lead in the stormwater review given the nature and
direction of stormwater runoff. All of these items can be addressed subsequent to your
zoning action with no city requ5.rement for a conceptual drainage plan.
I hope this addresses your concerns.
Steve Hansen
Senior Engineer
Developer Services, Engineering Services
City of Spokane
1
•OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax {509}477-2243
~
&,M'`"o: C""`-y "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO: Spokane County Division of Plannin ~p
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: July 18, 2001
PROJECT: UR-3.5 CHG OF COND CHURCH KINGDOM HALL
FILE ZE-0003A-98 -t 7.,+:
- ~
rn' ".A
vPQ T 1J~r~'(.ki~L
Hearing: 08/01/2001 @ 10:30
. : -Planner: TAMMY JONE e
L~~;
Review Date: @
Sponsor/Applicant: GREG RIPLEY DIVjScON, ;--~F- ~.►_~,6`~ti;,;t~
Section Township Range: 23-25-43
Technical Review Date: (10/19/2000 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
The Spokane County Engineer has no objection to the Change of Condition Application for relocation
of the church building onto the previous parking lot location.
1. Any required access permits and improvements to Pratt Avenue must be approved by the City
of Spokane.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans. Because this proposal is located in a joint planning area, the applicant is advised to
consult with the City of Spokane to ensure that the drainage and access plans conform to
adopted city standards.
3. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
4. The proposed zone change shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for
roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
CC: AppliCant GREG RIPLEY
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
• W n-rr ii n ND
HYDROELECI'R1C SERVICLS
~ 1 914 E. NOR"I'I t~c~C)TI iiLL~ DRIVf:
SMKANE, VVAsHirrrTON 99207-2794
(509) 625-7800
FAX 625-7816
RECEIVED
SPOF(ANE CAurvrY
July 11, 2001
iF ~t 1 l ?041
Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
Division of Planning DIVIwI,~N OF: PL_,~M"JIyG
Public Works Department
Spokane County
1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99260-0220
RC: ZE-3A-98, Kingdom Hall of the Jehovah's Witnesses
We have reviewed the needs for this project and offer the following comments.
rn that the scope of the project will include a new and separate structure, an on site water
plan will need to be developed. The water plan must address domestic, irrigation, a11d fire
flows for the project. The fire district having authority tivill deten-iline the fire flow
requirement. The Water Department reserves the right to increase the fire flow.
City of Spokane Design Standards must be utilized both in the development of the water
plan and the installation of the water facilities.
The water plan must be reviewed and approved by the City of Spokane prior to the
initiation of water service.
Sincerely,
0
~
Harry A. cLean, r., ~
Senior ngineer
. , ~
Jones, Tammy
~
From: Hohman, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Jones, Tammy; Baldwin, Greg
Subject: RE: Pratt and Havana - Ripley project
Based upon several discussions with Steve Hansen of the City of Spokane, we have decided
that it makes sense for the City to take the lead in reviewing and accepting the drainage
plans for this proposal given the nature and direction of stormwater runoff. Spokane
County will maintain a role in the review and acceptance of the drainage plans. In light
of the fact that the City is not requiring a concept drainage plan for this proposal, we
are retracting our previous condition of approval.
Thanks,
John V. Hohman, P.E.
- 1
i
SPOKANE RE t~tH DISTR.ICT
,
~
S P O K ~ N ~ ; " a • C7 U N '7' Y
i:,..
DN[SION 01= PLANNING A D(VI5ION C)F THE PU131>IC WURKS UL"•NARTVI[YT
MIGHAEL V. NEEDHAM, DIItFCi'bR GAR1' 0I3I:KG, DIRECI'UR
DATE: August 18, 2001
TO: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FROM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD
SUBJECT: Proposed Zone Change: ZE-3A-98 (Ripley)
l. References:
a) Map of subject, scale 1" = 40' dated September 22, 2001, received by this office October 4, 2000.
b) Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadrangle, Washington and Ydaho,
Allan B. Griggs, 1966. c) Soil Survey, Spokane Countv, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
d) Spokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
August, 1974.
.4e Disposal Systems, January 19, 1995.
e) Spokane County Rules and Regulations for Sewaf
fl Logs of water wells in Range 43EWM, Township 25N, Sections 14, 22, 23, 24, and 26.
g) Map: Spokane N.E. Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Findings:
a) This project lies inside the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer Sensitive Area, but not over the Spokane
Rathdrum Aquifer.
b) The project is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #2 and within the service area of the City of
Spokane. Water supply will be a public system.
c) The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Area, inside the
General Sewer Service Area, and inside the Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201'
Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the City of Spokane I'ublic Works,
pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area
7026 W. E31tOADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PNONE: (509) 977-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 9 TDD: (509) 477-7133
ATTACHMENT C
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
. .
. ~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
1 1 APPROVAL FOR ZE-3A-98
DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOK;AI\T COUWY
1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors.
2. The Change of Conditions applies to the following real property: That portion of the NW
of the SW %4 of Section 23, T. 25N., R. 43E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington,
described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest corner of the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 of
said Section 23; thence N.00 05'45"W., along the West line of said Section 23, 281.97
feet; thence S.88 34'40"E., 50.68 feet; thence S.22 01112"E.1 155.21 feet; thence S.50
02'09"E.9 47.61 feet; thence S.52 05'45"E., 29.27 feet; thence N.89 34'56"W., 108.12 feet;
thence S.00 05'45"E., 89.49 feet, to the south line of the NW'/4 of the SW'/4 of said
Section 23; thence N.89 34'56"W., along South line, 60.00 feet to the Point of Beginning.
Except that portion lying within Havana Road.
3. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, as amended.
4. The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner. Variations, when approved by the Director of the
Division of Planning/designee, may be permitted, including but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations
must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the
original intent of the development plans shall be maintained.
5. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific
lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
permit.
6. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
7. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance
acceptable to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any
building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at
access points is not obscured or impaired.
ZE-3A-98 August 1, 2001 Public Hearing
Division of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
page 1 of 2
. .
8. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall
only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall
generally provide as follows:
The parcel of property legally described as: . Records of Spokane
County, Washington is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County
Hearing Examiner on August 1, 2001, imposing a variety of special development
conditions. File No. ZE-3A-98 is available for inspection and copying in the
Spokane County Division of Planning.
ZE-3A-98 August 1, 2001 Public Hearing
Division of Planning Recommended Cvnditions of Approval
page 2 of 2
t ,
.
~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
s,~~:c~,•~~, "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO: Spokane County Division of Plannin
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads ~
DATE: July 18, 2001
PROJECT: UR-3.5 CHG OF COND CHURCH KINGDOM HALL
FILE ZE-0003A-98
Hearing: 08/0112001 @ 10:30
Planner: TAMMY JONES
Review Date: @
Sponsor/Applicant: GREG RI PLEY
Section Township Range: 23-25-43
Technical Review Date: (10/19/2000 @ 1:15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Division of Planning for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
The Spokane County Engineer has no objection to the Change of Condition Application for relocation
of the church building onto the previous parking lot location.
1. Any required access permits and improvements to Pratt Avenue must be approved by the City
of Spokane.
2. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans. Because this proposal is located in a joint planning area, the applicant is advised to
consult with the City of Spokane to ensure that the drainage and access plans conform to
adopted city standards.
3. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
4. The proposed zone change shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for
roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
CC: Applicant GREG RIPLEY
Enqineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
, Page 2 Engineers
08107/2001 Hearing / Review / 10/19/2000 7R
,ZE-0003A-98
.
5. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition.
Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work."
END
)
Baldwin, Greg
From: Hohman, John
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Jones, Tammy; Baldwin, Greg
Subject: RE: Pratt and Havana - Ripley project
Based upon several cliscussions with Steve Hansen of the City of Spokane, we have decided
that it makes sense for the City to take the lead in reviewing and accepting the drainage
plans for this proposal given the nature and direction of stormwater runoff. Spokane
County will maintain a role in the review and acceptance of the drainage plans. In light
of the fact that the City is not requiring a concepi drainage plan for this proposal, we
are retracting our previous condition of approval.
Thanks,
John V. Hohman, P.E.
1
1 1
Baldwin, Greg
From: Jones, Tammy
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 1:50 PM
To: Baldwin, Greg; Hohman, John Subject: FW: Pratt and Havana - Ripley project
-----Ori.ginal Message-----
From: Hansen, Steve
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 8:10 AiM
To : Jones, Tammy
Cc: Hohman, John; Brown, Eldon
Subject: Pratt and Havana - Ripley project
Tammy,
This memo is in response to your voice message of June 12 concerna.ng the proposed land use
action for the site lying north of the Pratt and Havana intersecta.on. T have been in
contact with John Hohman in the county engineering departrnent on several occasions
concerning this site. As you know, the ownership lies both within the county and city. We
have sevexal concerns with the site including street, water, sewer and stormwater which
will need to be resolved prior to the city issuing any permit for city services. Also, we
(the city) has agreed to take the lead in the stormwater review given the nature and
direction of stormwater runoff. All of these items can be addressed subsequent to your
zoning action with no city requirement for a conceptual drainage plan.
I hope this addresses your concerns.
Steve Hansen
Senior Engineer
Developer Services, Engineering Serva.ces
City of Spokane
1
~
' RECEIVED
S .t> ~ i A 2~ ~ 2001
= _ ~ _ ~ C] [~1 N
- - - SP~~rE
' EN~r~l~FA
DrvISrO~r 01= P~,;~r~NIrvG .fl I]IVISIOIti3 O~~ THEi f"urir,IC LNOPKS CinR ,M1CHAELV IVEED}iAM, DIREC'roR GARY OgrRG, DIRECTOR
MEMORAN DUM
~T -4
O: ~~p.~k~;ne: Qqunt~r_ D~v~sion^o~En~ineering_&Roa.ds;rS ~cott_En geI-~iarc~, cl~ ~a~id~
Spokane County Division of Engineering &Roads; John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities; J'im Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sirns
Spokane Regional Health L7istrict; Steve Holderby
Spokane County ;Division af Building & Code Enforcetnent; Jeff Forry
Fire District No. 1
+City of Spokane Water & Hydroelecti-ic Services
City of Spokane Transportation Services
City of Spokane Planning Ser-vices
FRDM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
DATE; July 3, 2001
SC_]~~CT: Review and comments far the hearing an August 1, 2001
FQ1E NO: ZE-3A-98
BRYEF DESCRTP'TYON: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban
Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5) zane to allow the canstructian af aChurch.
PARCELNO: 35233.9155
APPLICANT; Gregory Ripley for Pratt Avenue Jehovah's Witness, 4104 E.
Fratt Ave., Spokane, WA 99202 509J475-4484. _
Nate that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any camrnents to me by July 1$, 2001
Attachments= Notice of Public Hearing
1025 K BRC7AC}V+JAY • SPOI{.ANG, WASHiNGTOhi 99260-0220
PF-1ONE: (5[]9) 477-7200 • FAx: (5C)9) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 977-7113
V
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS:
Application: ZE-3A-98; Change of Conditions to an existing Urban Residentia13.5 (UR-3.5) zone to '
allow the construction of a Church.
Parcel No: 35233.9185
Hearing Date and Time: August 1, 2001 @ 10:30 am.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Owner/Applicant: Gregory Ripley for Pratt Avenue Jehovah's Witness, 4104 E. Pratt Ave., Spokane,
WA 99202 509/475-4484.
Address and Location: Generally located northeasterly of and adjacent to Pratt Ave, in the
SW '/a of Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Existing Zoning: Urban Residentia13.5 (UR-3.5)
Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Planning, as the lead agency on July 13, 2001. The comment period ends July 30, 2001. .
Related Permits: In order for the project to be developed as proposed, additional permits must be
obtained including access permits, sewer connection permits and building permits.
Division of Planning Staff: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, (509) 477-7225
HEARING EXANIINER PROCEDURES
Rearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0294. All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged. Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action. All hearings will be conducted in facilities that are accessible to persons
with physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A StaffReport will generally be available for inspection seven
days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane County
Division of Planning, 1$` Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260-0220, between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of documents
will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special needs, please call
the Division at (509) 477-7200. Send written comments to the Spokane County Division of Planning,
1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Tammy Jones. Motions must be made in writing and
submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3`d Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W.
Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245.
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Scction 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER: ZE-3A-98
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Change of Conditions to an existing Urban RESidentia13.5 (UR-3.5) zone to allow
the construction of a Church.
PARCEL NO: 35233.9185
HEARING DATE AND TIME: August 1, 2001 @ 10:30 am
APPLICANT: Gregory Ripley for Pratt Avenue Jehovah's Witncsses, 4104 E. Pratt Ave., Spokane, WA 99202
509/475-4484.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located northeasterly of and adjacent to Pratt Ave, in the SW '/4 of Section
23, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and
other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from
the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 5:00 p.m., July 30, 2001,
if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be sent to the contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Tarruny Jones, Associate Planner
Spokanc County Division of Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 99260-0220 (509) 477-7225
DATE ISSUED: July 13, 2001 SIGNATURE: ri - CON~VIIIVIS R.EGARDING F1VVIROTIlVIFT~tTAL CONCF~tNS ARE WE[ &WATHE H[EARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be madc to the SPOKANE COLJNTY
DIVISION OF PLANNING, lst Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10)
calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the
appellant should be prepared to makc specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Planning to assist you with the
specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia)
2. , Sgokana~C_oui)ty=D~ivisiun_of_Engincring, Tiansportation_Engiiieering;_Scolt.~rt~~llia~~
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, DevelopmEnt Services; John Hohman
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red •
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
8. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
9. City of Spokane Water & Hydroelectric Services
10. City of Spokane Transportation Services
11. City of Spokane Planning Services
.
• g Services
, • •
~
°9FC
Memo
To: Tammy Jones, Spokane County Planning e ~'TYelyGIN~~
~ ^ `.~.wv~ R
From: Don Ramsey, City Traffic Engineer Vt-7-,.
CC: Sleve-Stairs; E.I.-T., Transportation- Engineer=~
Dafe: 1217/00
Re: Comments on Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses new building, 4104 E
Pratt
Traffic Engineering has reviewed the referenced proposal. We have the following
comments and concems.
• The proposal straddles the City Limits line. Who administers this project?
• Which Zoning holds preference? This proposal lies in an area of Joint Planning.
• This proposal straddles two parcels. This causes a problem for the Assessor with
different tax rates within the same parcel. Aggregation of the parcels would be
necessary in order to construct.
• The right-of-way is irregular here and vacations and dedications should be
accomplished at this time.
Traf#ic Engineering would recommend annexation to the City of Spokane. Appropriate
investigation to settle on the exact outline of the portion proposed for annexation should
begin as soon as practical. Annexation solves who administers the project, creates a
single appropriate taxing area, utilizes a single set of Zoning and Design Standards, and
incorporates this parcel already using City water, sewer, and transportation facilities. It is
the appropriate solution to the multi jurisdictional hurdles.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please call Mike Britton or me at
625-6470. _
darfjmb/cdf
T:\DivisionslAdministrationlDocuments\WPOOUehovah's.doc
• o • County Public Works,
. • o . on Eng • Section,
D • • County • •
1026 ' OADWA • OKANE WA • • . 1 (509) 4 . 11
Memo
To: Spokane County Planning
Planner: Tammy Jones .
From: Scott Engelhard &z ~
Subject: ZE-0003A-98
Applicant: GREG RIPLEY
Date: October 19, 2000 RE: Technical Review COC
This proposal lies in the Central Park/Glenrose Stormwater Control Area. The Spokane
County Transportation Engineering Section requests a concept drainage plan for this
proposal that meets the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the
Central Park/Glenrose Stormwater Control Area. The application is considered technically
incomplete at this point in time. A fee agreement will need to be submitted with the .
concept drainage plan for review to take place.
Please contact Bill Hemmings at 477-3600 for details on completing the concept drainage
requirements.
r r
Kimball, Sandy
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 4:06 PM
To: Jones, Tammy
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Kimball, Sandy; Parry, Ed; Sims, Brenda; Darrell, Virginia; Baldwin, Greg;
Hohman, John
Subject: ZE-3A-98 - Greg Ripley
10-10-00
I received the above referenced proposal on October 4, 2000. This proposal lies in the Central Park/Glenrose Stormwater
Control Area. I request a concept drainage plan for this proposal that meets the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and the Central Park/Glenrose Stormwater Control Area. I consider the application to be
technically incomplete at this point in time. A fee agreement will need to be submitted with the concept drainage plan for
review to take place.
I could not review for critical areas since the map that was presented did not have a vicinity map.
Bill Hemmings, PE '
1
PAGE 1 15:5 9:0 9 OCT 2000
Road# Road Names.......... MPost. Reference Descriptio Road Loa Info..........
01757 HAVANA ST ( START ) .000 14 TH AV ( S POKANE ) U 19 GR.AVE L 12
HAVANA ST .070 HAVANA-YALE RD (END) U 19 PAVED 2^1'
.120 14 TH AV ( S TART ) U 19 PAVED 2"?
HAVANA ST ( END ) .270 PRATT AV ( S POFCA.NE ) U 19 PAVED 27
01758 HAVANA ST (START) .000 8TH AV (START) & SPO U 16 PAVED 24
HAVANA ST .070 7TH AV (START) & SPO U 16 PAVED 24
.130 6TH AV (START) & SPO U 16 PAVED 24
.190 5 TH AV ( S TART S PO U 16 PAVED 24
.230 4TH AV (START) & SPO U 16 PAVED 41~
.310 3RD AV (START) & SPO U 16 PAVED 4-
. 3 8 0 2 ND AV ( START ) U 16 PAVED 4.;
.500 S PR.AGUE AV ( S TART U 16 PAL'ED 408
.540 UPRR CROSSING #53142 U 16 PAVED 48
.870 FAIRGROUNDS RD (STAR U 16 PAVED 48
1.000 BROADWAY AV (START) U 16 PAVED 48
HAVANA ST (END) 1.180 SPOKANE CITY LIMITS U 16 PAVED :8
017063 'riAVANA ST ( S TART ) .000 2 9 TH AV ( START S P U 19 PAVED
HAVANA ST .230 2 5TH AV ( START ) U 19 PAVED
HAVA.NA ST (EIv'D) .430 22ND AV (SPOKANE) U 19 GRAVEL 12
.480 NORTH END OF ROAD U 19 GR.AVEL 1_21
01774- ~LnVANA ST (START) .000 UPRIVER DR (START) U 19 LIGHT BITTJM. cu'-;
HAVPNA LST .380 BUCKEYE AV ( START ) U 19 L I GHT B I TUM . C-.
.520 FAIRVIEW AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 09
.610 FREDERICK AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 09
H:AVANA ST l'END1 .634 EUCLID AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 09
01756 HAVANA ST (START) .000 GLENROSE RD & GLENNG U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
HAVANA ST (END) .040 SPOKANE CITY LIMITS U 19 LIGHT BITUM. 18
01760 HAVANA ST (START) .000 BIGELOW GULCH RD (ST U 19 PAVED 24
HAVANA ST ( END ) .490 COPLEN AV ( START U 19 PAVED 24
01761 HAVANA-YALE RD (STAR .000 GLENR.OSE RD U 19 PAVED 20
HAVANA-YALE RD .020 GLENROSE RD Y U 19 PAVED 20
.090 BIG SPRINGS RD U 19 PAVED 20
.210 16 TH AV ( S TART ) U 19 PAVED 20
.280 15TH AV (NONESTABLIS U 19 PAVED 20
HAVANA-YALE R.D (END) .290 HAVANA ST U 19 PAVED 20
7 Records Processed
,
1
1 .
RECEIVED
` 0 CT 0 3 2000
.
.
' S P O K A N E ' ~-T C pVOKM CWfflYiM*M
' UNLS(ON OF i'LANN[NG A D[v[SION OF 7xE PUBUC WORKS DEPqR'IMENi
MiCHAFI. !`:'EDHA~t. DTRECToK C.AkY OBERG, DIFEC'IY)R
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard
cto Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Development Engineering Services; Bill Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District: Steve Holderby
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
City of Spokane Water & Hydroelectric Services
City of Spokane Construction Services
City of Spokane Transportation Services
City of Spokane Planning Services
,
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
DATE: October 3, 2000
RE: ZE-3A-98
TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING
OCTOBER 19, 20009 1:15 .m.
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING COIVFER~NCE RM. 2C
Please review the above application and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING FORM
for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this meeting. The
sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. If you cannot attend
the meeting, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the attached form to
me prior to the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEW FORMS wil) be given to the sponsor
at the meeting and included in the Division of Planning file for this proposal. Thank you for your
cooperation. lf you have any questions about the application, please contact me at 477-7200.
Note: The Division of Planning will now be circulating for comments on
the SEPA checklist at the time of technical review. This will be the only
time you will be able to comment regarding the SEPA checklist for this
project.
c: Greg Ripley. 4104 E. Pratt Ave., Spokane, WA 99202
Attachments: Technical Review Form, SEPA Checklist, Application, Site Plan
I
]I~'?i~4`. LR(I:OU::r\l' • tit!( ic.:.%VE, WJti'rili\G.TON 'iy=h(?-C!:_'ll
rHL FA\ , c, ;1;, . -2--; ; . T[1! )
1
, -
Spokane County
• : Division of-Planning Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time: October 19, 2000 @ 1:15
Project File No.: ZE-3A-98
Project Location: Generally located northeasteriy of and adjacent to Pratt
Avenue in the SW'/4 of Section 23, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Project Description: Change of conditions to an existing Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) zone to allow the construction of a church.
Parcel No(s): 35232.9185
Applicant(s): Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses
c/o Greg Ripley
4104 E. Pratt Ave.
Spokane, WA 99202
Project Planner: Tammy Jones
•
. , 1 •
PLANN'ING SPo1~N~c coUNTY
. . r:t
I'r
~
crrANGr or coNnTTroNs ron A
]'REVTOUSL'' A1'1'R0'VT~;D Z0NE C:iJAI~Cff
~ L
Dztc: Sept, 5, 2000 Appliczition No. -IL6
Nai»c 0f Applicant/IZepresentativc: Gregor.y P. Ripley, S.r. representing Pratt Avenue
S iJitnesses at 4249 E. Pratt Ave.
Congreg tion of ~
Vlailiilg ~\dc(ress: 4104 E. Pratt Ave. . Spo~ane.WA 91ehovth
202-36~
City: BPOKANE Statc: WA zip: 99202-5364
Phone: 509-370-1566 Cel (Worlc) 509-535-2100 (Z-Ionie)
F:xisiing 7one Classification: URBAN RESIDENTIAL 3.5
Dale Lxisting Zoiie ClassiCcation Establislled: Feb, 29, 2000
Legal Descriptiotl of Property: See attachment no. 1
Sectiotl ToNvnship 29 Nortilb Rangc 43EWM PTN of NW ;SW-4
,
SOlll'ce oI'Legal: FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
Parcel No.: 35233.917? PROl'OSE' D CIZANGE Or CONDI:T.IONS
Rci'erctice speci.fic "Condi(ion(s)" OFOr1gIn11 1pprOVa], (Cile thc ttplilictible conclitio►l From
the I'i»dings and Oi'ClC1' Of fhE rIC1t'117g LXaI11111ei' C0111I111tLee'S plIbI1C 11CaClI1g).
TO MOVE BUSLDING FROM ADJACENT PROPERTY TO SUBJECT PAOPERTY
Give dclailed Explaiiatioil or i-eq«est for changc i» s1atUS 0f tllC j)I'0pOtiaI.
Change from parking for church bldg. (Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses)
to bui].ding site for new Kingdom Hall. To include T.ype one landscape
on south PL ad jacent to a personel residence 10" strip of blinder shrubs,
setback 5' to North PL and 20' backyaxd from East PL, Porte-cochere for
protected off loading of handicapped and elderly meeting attenders, onsite roof
Irclevelopinent of the sitc will be e11tinged substlntially Uy illis renuest, or Clle pi•operty hns drainage.
bOU11dZ1'1eS dIffel'e11C tllilll O1'Ig11lZIly proposed, a revised developnlent plan must be submitlecl.
.~lgllilllll'C 1)) 'canl or ~ nt Adciress if differeiit ilian Applicant
. , .
;
, . .
i%'Icv. 8/93; sai1i
~
• J . ` , a►#► ~ 1~' • ' w•r •L' ~i 1 .
. • ' ' ' ~1~~~~ • ~ti • - i
. - ~ 7xl~
~ . : 3 ~ .
AFTCR RECQRDING MAIL TO:
~ T' • ~
PRATT AVENUE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAI-I' S WITNESSES, SPOKANE; WASHINGTON, a
. non-profi.'t corporation . . ~
4249 E. FRATT AVENUE SPOKANC, WA 99202.- . ' ' : , t •
4283148 :
_ 10~21 11998 o 112
: 06A
FIRST. AliIERIGAN TITIE INS wD . $9.00 Saokane Co, WA
;
Filcd for Rccord at Rcquest of
FYRS1' AAiERICAN TITLE
EscrowMiini6G'r: 7668='JB' . . _Statutoi'' WarrantY Deed `
► ~i~l~~ I ' ~
Cranlor(s): Rocky Top L. L. C,, A WashingCon Limited Liabil.ity Company . ~
Grantee(s): PRATT AVENUE CONGREGATTON OF JEHOVAH' S WITNESSES, SPOKANE,
WAS1-iINGTON, a non-profit corporation
Abbrc;viateci Lcgal: S23 T251i R43EWM PTN OF NW1/4 SW1/4, records of SPOKANE
County, WA
Add;lional lega!(s) on page:
Asscssor's Tax Parccl Number(s): p!n of 35233.9177 , , .
'11IL GIZANTOR Rocky Top L. L. C., A Washiniton Limited Li.ability Company
for and in consitleration of none - gi f t , i
in Iiand paicl, convcys and warrants to PRATT AVENUE Cb1QGREGATION OF JEHOVAI-i' S WITNESSES,
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, a non-profit corporation
thc fnllowing described real cslate, siluated in the Caunly af SPOKANE , SCate of Washington:
See Attachcd Exhibit A
SUI3JCCT T0: see attached Exhibit A
Dated this 20th day of October, 1998
By Rocky Top L.L.C., A Washington t3y
Limited Liabilit,y Company •
, •
r~
_-J
~ 13Y / ' J By
MYKE SHULEIZ, MANAGER
w- \ STATE OF WASHINGTON }
~ Cciunty of SPOKANC } S.5:
~ I ccrlify that I know or have salisfactory evidence that Mike Shuler
signt; d lhis inslrumciit, an oalh slatcd that he auttiorizc(i to
cxecutc lhe instrumcnl anei a4powlecigcd it as thcManager ~
of ROCKY TOP L. L. C. to be the free and voluntary act af such
party for the uses and purposes mentioncd in this instrument.
~ r ' -7
Dalcd: October _2_~~
~a~KWA JAiQNA BLATR) . w
NNA 6L,AIR ~°tary Public*in and for the State of WASHINGTON
4 12esicling at CI-ICNEY
~~ca~rA~ a~t~
0 W~y~~ My appointment cxpires: 9/26/02
ru LWCMM.
~ E7~M ~ ~ ~
Pabc 1 LP13-10
4^
LU ' •
1
~
t ' ~
. ~ 5,~~ ~ •
. ~ . ~
• _ + ~1~1~~
ZE
~
• "'r
• ,:a ,
r.~
. • r V
A
~
C~ -
'M-~ A ~
~
~ENT~~
~VN .230~.1-
-
AN N 11.1o
s
~
. • , *
. • ~
' a 1
SLPA LN-VIRONIMr--1't J.A.L.. CfUCKU.7 1 , - ,
WAC 1971 1 ! 6V . 4 . .r
Spokane Envzianrrienzal, Ordinance 5eczion 11.10?30(1)
PURPOSE oF CHECKlfS7" .
L ~1
TI~e SC3Z+~ ~,FF~+~iroI1II~ef1t~1 PQl1C-y AcE (SERA), chapEer 4H~.? X C RC~'J, r4quiies all governmer~al 2aeficies
to conszder the environme,,iLal Impacts oi a proposo1 besa-e mdlun- dewisians. An envirronr-ikenta1
irrlpacL staternent (EIS) rnus-, be prv-pared iar all propos,-ls wirn probable sF~rzificunt 26
versz imQacrs c,n
~
tlic qua.iiry of the environment. 7he purpose of this cs eck-rsz is co Provide in'{ormazion to hel-o you
and The ageney identify impact from your proposal (and t❑ reauce or, avoid iripacts from ~h~ p; oaosal, .
is reauired,
if iz ca.a1 be ione) and Lo help t~e agency decide whe:.' er an EIS
.T'V.5TR UC'7'TO1iS FOR APP,C..rC.41V7--,z
This environmental che4ldssi asks you to describe sorne basic informatiQn abaul
yau~ pi ~pos:.
Go~-err~rr~e:~ca1 aaarcies use rhis cneckljs4 to deten--Line whether the envir~nmen~al ianp~c-~s ar. }-oLt,
proposal are significanc, req-uin'nv greparatian of an EI5. Ar_swer the q-ueszions briefly, wzrh the r;osr
precise informaicior: -riown, or gi-ve the besz desc:ipzzon you can.
YOu must :=.nswer e;,ch question accurare?~,, and carefully, ta the bes of your knowledgw.
cases, you shauld be able to answer The queszions frflm y-our awr obse-rvdtEOr' or gr0jeCt
w~~~io~:t t~~ aeeA ra hire exper~. if you realI}~ do ~~or ~Sno~r the ar~swer, or if a que~io-n does nat
ap* to yoL: pronOsal, wnze "do not knaW" ar "does not applv". Conplete answe:s ta rhe quesrians
naw ma;r mvaid unnecess:u-y delays later.
SUrnc- que-sEions as; abou[ gove:nme.raroi re-gldiaiionsp suel-l as zorln., s#zc~re~irre, ana 1;a:--(irna:k
~ ' '
~~ese q~:essio~ if yo~ c~ri. yo~ n~~~ pro 1 .e:~s, tne
4 YLJLl.
7"he checklis4 aueszions aQply ra all pars of your proposaI, even i
i f yoL plun za dc) thern 0;-e= ape: i~d
of zl~e ar c~n di~~e: e:~~ p~cels ❑f land. Ariach any addi;ional infarm.~cior~ tr:at will help drscri~e- yaull .
praposal or 'rs enviro=ental efzecu. The agency to whFCh you sabmit tEs checkiisz rna-V asL
;:ou za
e~ol~in y~ur ar~s~u~ers or proti-ide ad~tlanal inforna~eon reasonably reIaced zo deterrr~inin~ ~a~=
be signific~z adve: se impUc-L.
US~ +DF CHECKLIS1 F0R NO+V FROIECTPROPDSAL5:
Comolere rhys chew k-IML for non-project proposals, even thau~,a questians rLy be eC: "~~,~s na4
aDpl~-." 1~ .~D!,~ 1~~, cosnvlere t'.r:e SL'I'C'LEMENTAL-SI-EET FOR NON-PpO-FEGTACTi~~S CD a7-L D).
p L
~
Fo: nan-prcJevt .~cz iaus, i~e re7e: ences in che c~ecklist ta zhe words ~ject," ari
,PYoPe~1-v or sil;." snould be reac as "prapasalr" „propasex}" -and "a,{1~~~~d croog-a~~ic a.r~,~iyn
. ,
~~~~~?14 ~R~'~''~i:'_'•""~.i L-~iul :~RC~ k! c~e I•'-~~ ~ ' 31
! -
s ~
* I J
4
0
A:'BACKGROLND FII..E/PRO]ECT NO. '
. . ,
1., Name of proposed project, if applicable:
.
14 1 Q L/
,
/~5 w/
2. Name of applicanc:
c, C~c y
3. Address and phone nur_Zber oi aoplic~nt and conzac: person:
.
C>y 1--~/J~~ 17 i~C,:~.
,
Dare checklis: prepa.-ec:
5. ACI-r.c;✓ requesz:ncr cliec1.1is:
~ 0/t/i /zj 6
6. Proposed tir,un- or scnedule (includin~ phasina, if 2?plicz6le):
Soollane Environmen::.. Ordi-a-ce Cneck?:s: P;~j` - ot
f
~
. ' J
A. Bt1CKGROUND (concinucd): , . : ►
a. Do you have anY Plans for future acditions, es~ansion, or further acuviry related to or connec-ed with thi
7. s
proposal? If yes, explain.
1 C: ~ ~N t. ~c
~t►/ ~ ~ f ,
,
~~..~~ti~ S . ~ ~ zx-~-~~ C' ~c, •T a7 . Z-
4 -0 tq- b/4-1-1+
~ 2 /r~- ~
c~ /L 4
,
b. Do you oNn or have opcions on lanc nearby or adjaceac to this proposal? If yes, eYplain. .
S. List any environmental informacion yoLknow about that has been preoared, or will be prepared, di;ectly
related to this proposal.
9. Do you kno whethe: applications are pe..din~ for governmental approLals of other propos~s direc_y
afiecting the property covered by your proposal• Ir yes, exvl~n
~IL 1p. Lisz ~ny jO~~~= s1Ii1e;1L zoprov~s or pe: mics zhaL ~%ill be needed ior your p: opos~.l, if kno~ n_
L
~f~ ~i~ 3n-~> ~ r~~~-~~• .
'
Sooka:~e En~:!ron~-n:_': 0:.~!~--::ce Cneck!is~
• ~ 1
s s
A. B•ACKGROLJND (continued):
11~ • Give a brieE, complete description of you* proposal, i.ncludia- the prooosed uses and the size of the project and
site. ?here are seve:al ouestior_s later in t~is chec'_ that aso you to describe cert
ain aspects of your prooos al.
You do noc need to reeeat those ans:vers on this pazQ.
• ,
Sv,-vl;= G?✓~E-~;:~ S~~I~-1/~L , f~D.~- ~l'~,c~~ S~, Z4/~/'~/',~
. t,
1?. Locacion of the proposal. Gi~e ssfficier.t 1~formarion for a person to unde=stand the precise locazion o~ vour
prooosed project, includin~ a st_eet address, if any, s.-~d seciion, townsb-ip a-~d range, i¢ knoR-n If o Proposal
would occuc over a rar.ge of area, pr0~'1G~e z-:e rangP or boundurleS Oi the SIIe(S). Provide a 1eg31 CZSCriGLiOII,
site plan, viciniry map, and topcgiaohic rnaD, if reasoaably available. NVhile you should subm-it any plaris
required by the agency, you are not requ:red to dL: licaEe maps or decailed plans submir-ed r~ i:h any pe= r! ~t
application related co tnis chec'_~Ls. ~ z 77' 1~ Olq1VI%+ s1711c~A:~T6-7-. ,
Z-/ Po--A ` r
L -r TNc`
0 i= l-~A(JA
j c #1 lO a S-/11, 4,q /t~ C~ Lt 3 Z~:- vc.'a,7
13. Does the proposed action lie within The Aquifer Sens:tive Area (AS-0 1 he General Sewe: Se-v:ce Area? The
Priority Sewer Sen-ice Are-a? 1 he City of Spokar!e' (See: Soorane CouZty's t',SA Ovzj;ay Zoi-iz At1us ror
bound3ries).
4~~~
~
G ir-y rr S G~ .~~.f'/~
?
CC_c:..:5: ~ Oi ~i
f
• , r
. .
' . , . Evaluation For,
Agency Use Onl.y
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONIMENTAL ELE:ti1Er7S:
1. E:,,.r\Tx
u. General description oE the sice (ci:cle one): flac, rol'ina, hill steep slopes,
S
r' ; ~ 7t~ ~
rr_ountainous, othe.: .
D-5-i4~'•~T A 'Ror:.rL. c:c
b. What is che steepest slope on the sice (aooro:cim3te Dercent slope)?
c. Whac genec3l types of soils are found on the site ~to-L e:camDle, clay, sand, ;rsvel; peat,
mLCk)% If you knoR% the classificacion of ac7r1cultu:al soils, specify therl ane note any
prime farml3nd.
~L l Aoc_ , .
d. r~re the*e suriace L-r~c:~cions or hisory oL Lr15za'D1e SO11S iIl LL2 1I11I71eII18ie VICin.1N?
If so, describe. •
9V
.
e. Describe the purpose, c,~-pe and aPpro:cimate quantities of any fillin~ or or3~~o proposed. Indicate souLce of fill.
, r
f. Could erosiol-I occur as a result o' cle-arincl, constiuction, or useP Ir so, ;ener:il~l
c'.escr9b,
Ji ! It
~/o, C~xA a5 - ltJL) s~~
Saa'.-_ar_e Gr:•.'!ro-~~,....a1 O_ e Chec'.-:'_:s: n'`- 6 0~
~
r
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only ,
B. E_WIRONDYIEVI'AI, FI F•ti¢N'j'S (Continued): •
:
g.• • About what percent of the site will be covered with unpervious surfaces afte: project
consLruction (for example, asphalt or buildings)%
h. P: oposed rrieastres to reduce or control erosion, or otner inpaccs to the earn, if any:
20' F)/'~A-lnXGc~
.~G .~0~
2. AIR
a. What type of eri-lissions to the air would resulz from the proposal (i.e., eust,
automobile, odors, indus; ial, w ood smoke) during constr"Liction and when the project
is comoletzd? If an~ , oenerally describe and give appro:timate quantities, if k.nown.
~--xiS n/L,~~ ~ 0 C4 ~AO~~.~f ~ /~4~
b. Are rhere any oi~-site sources oi er_Zissions or odor that may affect yo~- proposal%
If so, generally describe.
c. P.-ooosed measu:e, to reduce or cone*ol enissions or oche: impaccs co ai;, if an:
.
SPokai1G' Eilv:rOi r-ziC'::...! 0:l-::~~ ch:.~.C!.$~
1
. . . - Evatuation For
AQency Use Onlv . •
B. EWIRONMENTAL ELEi1r1EiITS (Continued): . . : ,
3. WATER
a. Suri3Ce:
I) Is there any surface -water body on or in t:-e imme~iate vic*rrity of the site (includinc,
y-zar-round and seasonal strearns, S3lLwaLe', lakes, poncs, weclands)? I: yes, describe
~ . . r .
cy-oe and provide n:r~.es. If aoprooriate, sZaje ~%nai ea.~ or river it t1ows into.
. . .
~
Z) Wi11 the project requLre any work over, i:a, or ad}acent to (•:vithin 200 ieet) the
desc:-ibea n-acers? If es, please describe and accuc4 available plans.
A,
Estim3te thz ~rrioLnt oi fill and e:ec~;e rr.a[e:ial Lhwi ~%ould be placeci L-~ or r~moved
from surfaca w1ce= er we:lands anc' indicat° the are3 of the site thai R-ould be affected.
Ineicate the soL:ce or iill maceri~l.
s) Will the proposal reQuire surface water wizhdraw:.ls or divers:ons? Give a gene:al
description, purpose, and appro:cimate qua.ricicies if knoNn.
/V A~- .
4. he •Vichin a 100-year flaodpl:un' Ii so, note location on the sitz
5) Does che pCODOS.:l
plan.
1
m r
Sc) o!.a n e E.n•: 1-0 1-1 mz::...? 0-C':= _::c~ Cn~~1-1:s~ P.~~_ S a: ? r
.
• Evaluation For
' Agency Use Only
B. . E-.-NTVIRONl~1ENT.AI. FLE:tiLEiNT5 (Continued): :
b). Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste maLerials to surf3ce waters? If so,
describe the type of wastz and anticivated volume ot eiscnarcre.
.
All n
b. Ground:
1) 1`tl iIl ~roundwater be widneraw a, or will wate: be c~isc'r_ar;ed zo ground w at-: '
GiL-e generzl desc_ iocion, purpose, and aopro:cimace quant1fles if known.
1'i !n .
2) Describe w:.ste mateTi;.1 tnat will be discharged inco the ground from septic ta.nks or
. ,
othe: sanitary wasze cre3znnent facility. TJescrioe che general sj7e o tEe s;rs-zem,
the number oF houses to be seryed (if apolicaole), or zhz
,
nurnoer of eersons the s: se:n(s) -ure expecLe? Lo seI-'je-
.
A/ l ~ .
,
.i) Describe a~y s~yszerns, othe.* t~~an those designed for tre disposal of san.itsry• r: aste,
installed for the u. ose of discna.tQin', fluids beloN the grour.d suriace (inclueM g
S~S~~fi15 SLC~'1 3S ho e for che disposal oE storm waLZr or drain:.~e froci floor e:ains).
Describe the cvpe ot s,~se~, t~e ~nounc oE material zo be disposed o~ throu~n the
sys-Lem and the ty-pes of mucerials likely to be disposed of (including naceriys trhich
may enter the sy stzm inae~:e: tentlv through spills or as a rest:lt of fire fi;ntir;
activities). ~
~ A SooN~::e a
' I • t ~ ~
Evaluation For
Ag,ency Use Onlv ' B. ENIVZRONI+IENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
- : ,
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or peT: oleum fuels) be stored in above-
ground or underground storage tanks% If so, what t;-pes ane ouancities of materials wijj
be stored?
t.. .
5) Wh3t prozective measures will be ta.4en to ensure that leak5 or spills of any cherucals
stored or used on sice 'wilI not be alloxred to percolate to groLndwater (this includes
measures to keep chemicals out of disposal syszems cescribee in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
c. Water Runoff (includin~ s-orrn water)
1) Descr:be the source of rar_ofi (including szorm wacer) and r-nerhod oi colleczion and
disposal, if any (incluae euanzicies, if kno-wn). Whe:e will this waze: florv? "Nill this
n ate= flon into oLher wa;ers? If so, desci-ibe. f
'LIJ K C 114
~l~L~, 7-,) Ur111'; ~i
- ,
Will any che„zicals be szored, handled or t:sed on the sice L1 a locacion where a sp'11 0;
leak will drain to surace or groundw3ter ar to a sorm wate: dispos.:d s; stzm
discharaing to surface o- ~roun_d~~ater'
.i) Could w;,;cz ma[e;i..Ls en_er ground or suri:.ce c;aters= If so, ~Pre-ilv describe.
~
SD0ka:?~- Ef:v1COi1Z'?e:?c1l o:',:'-~-t'_° CheC^:~!5: f- I ' 7
.
. .
:
Evaluation For
Aaency Use Only
B. EN-TIROMME~TTAL EL:il~1ENI'S (Coocinued): '
'
d. Proposed mea.sures Lo reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacu, if
any (if Lhe proposed aczion lies within Lhe Aouifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on
explanations relating to facilicies concerning SecLions 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this
checklist).
4. PLANTS
a. Chec.':--. or circle types of vegetacion found on the site: deciduous z; ee: :1der, rnaole, aspen, other
1,,ever~re~n tree: fir, ced~; pine, otner
shrubs
1 / ,rass
pasture
CrOp OI' gra!n
wet soil plants: catcail, buttercup, bullrush, sfunk caboa~e,
other
ter plants: -water lilv, eel;rass, milfoil, othe:
~ other typ ~
es of ~•e~etacion
What lund :..nd :lrliou :L af ti-egerazion will be rc::.~ ti cd c: a~x:;.-': .
/vC
, -
c. Lisz threatened or end:-,:-i-ered species known to be on or r,ea; the site.
D/Ut~
d. Proposed 1lncscaoinQ, use of n:.tivIe plancs, or ache:
rzazzsures co prese--:z c: enhance ve~ oetation on the sdEe, iE anv: •
A!
SpG4sne O: ~~-_::ce Ck-,zc:..:s: o~
. . :
. . Evaluation For
Aaency Use Only .
B. ENVIRO~IENTAL ELEMEN'I'S (Continucd): „
5. A,IIVIALS
a. Ci: cle anv birds and :u-iimals a hich have been obse^%ed on or
neur tne sice or are kzown to be oi-i or nea- the size:
b!i QS: ~"a:i :v'~, ~?ei OII, e:a~le, SOII~DIi GS, OL~'I°.`'
m:.,rZmals: de-e,, bea,, elk, beave-, o«er: "
fisz: bassz salmon, trouz, herrin~, shellfisr, otnef:
b. List anv threatened or end:snaere!~ soecies l{noNn to be on o; near the site.
c. Is Lhe site part of a r:-iiQration route? If so, explain.
1f ~
d. Proposed measures to prese:ve or en.nance rNildIife, if any: l
6. Eti E R G Y A ~iD ~i A TLTRaL RESOG`RCES
a. What kinds of enerp- (electric, n:.tural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used
Lo meet cZe comoleted project's ener~y needs' Describe wnethe: it ~ill be t:sed for
.
heating, rZanufacturir_-, ezc.
.
b. Would Veu: p-ojecz the pocencial use of solar ene:ay bj adjacent prore:-:ies?
,
It; so, Cescr:Ibe.
nf~~.v
Soo'Kane Ezt;i: on-:~::.:.I I?
.
♦ t i • Evaluation For
' • , AQency Use OnIy
B. ' E:V"V'IRONi1~1EiVTI'Ai. ELE:l~1Ei3TS (Continued):
C. tiYlhac kinds of energy conservauon features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List ocher proposed measures to reduce or control e^ergy Lmpacts, if any:
4C., 0.L1 ijS
le, AZ-Le
,
7. EN-TVIRONN1ENT AI. HE.kLTH
a. Are Lhere any enviror.rnental health h3zards, inclLd=-''g ex?osure to to:cic chemicals,
risk of fire and zxplosion, spill, or hazardous w3sQ, th3c could occu: as a result of this
prooosal? If so, describe.
A/ C,
1) Describe soeci-aI emer~e:icy sz~-ices thac might be rz. uiree~.
Proposed mezsu.-es te : eauce o: cor.crol envi: or.::;-e:=Eai
health hazards, if any:
b. NN oise
1} 1`UhaL ty pes oE r_oise ex:st in the area which r-n-a; a{izc`- Your pro}ect (for exam- ple:
Lrai-fiC, equipment, ope:3tion, oche-)'
.
, '
2) ~~if haz tvpes :nc le~-els cf noise rN ould be c: e:.ted b;r or associaced with t:~e projecz
, " Q1 . t-.~¢sic cons.ructton ocer:,tsor►.
on a snort-~er:=~ o: a lo^a te: rn ba-sis (for e:cam e'
fror'- the sit~.
oth%--:)? Indicat:2 •:vhat `r.ours noise :-ould cor~~e
t.~rid
; Pa;e 1~ C• 1
Spo!.:~:~e E~.~: iron:-n"nta. OrLi::~::ce Chec :':is:
Evaluation For
Aaency Use OnIv "
B. ENIVIROMMENTAi. ELENIEINTS (Continucd):
v ,
3) Proposed measure to reduce or conLrol noise irnpacts, if any: N l.' ~irLJ
L.kN,,D AND SHORELINM USE
a. What is the currene use of the site and adjacent procerties?
~
b. Has che site been used for agriculture? If sO, descriQe.
A/~ ,
c. Describe an;i sz: ucE-u.---s on the site. ._F6
~
S r i~ ~S' ,~i ~ •~'r ~ ,~~~~~1~~~ r',~ ~~~l,r~-~" ~
d. t~'v'ill any szructu; es be demolished? If so,,whsCh?
I(L
JF
e. What is tlie curre:!L zoning classificacion off che site?
b(llc,
Spokane Eriviro:3me- Chei~?~s;
' . . . .
Evaluation For
' Aaency Use Only
B. Eti-VIRONi'YIEiNTAL ELE.:1~1F-iNTS (Continued):
WhaL is the current Comprehensive Plan desi~nacion of tb.e site? " g. If aoplicable, R: hat ss th- currenE shoreline maszeT pi ogram desi;nacion of the site?
h. Has any par-L of the st~ be~n classified as an °enviror.mentally sensiti~~e° are^~=
If so, specify-.
i. Appro~maLel ~ ho~~ n:v people would reside or ~N o: ~ in the completed project~
j. Approximatelv how m;.Lry people would the comple.ed projecL aisplsce?
k. Proposed me:.surzs co a~ oid or recuce displacemenc impacu, if any:
1. Proposed me_~L: es to e::sure the propos:~l is compati~l? with e:cistina and projecte'
, ,
1a1~1 LSeS a C1C il~a::5. 1~ :i::•%:
N
~ Sookane En• .-onme:::_. O:'-`i-z_.--z C4ec'.~''_1si . P~''' 1`0:
. ' ~
, . . , ~ .
Evaluation For
A2ency Use Only- B. EVVIRON1tiIENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
.
. ;
9. HoUSIVG
a. Approxirnatelv how rZany units would be provide~, if any? L*idicate ~hether high,
,
middle, or low-incorne housing. b. App. oximaEel.y how many units, if any, T~ ould be e:iminazec:- Indicate n-heLhe; high,
middle, or loR--income housing.
c. Proposed measures to reduce o; conL:ol housing imDacu, if a.riv:
A/ 4-
10. AiF.STF_F:"1'iC;S1-.1
. . .
a. Whac is the caIlest he:gnc of any proposed structure(s), not including anrennas;
"what is th principal ex-Lerior building mat`: ial(s) proposed?
b. Whac views in the ir-L-nediate vicinirv ~%ould be alte: ed or obsructed%
,
c. Proposed measLres to reducz o; conirol zeszheEic imDacts, if anj:
Spo'.-: ine Er.vironT,er:c_i. O: c._.-i-ce C~ec;.l*s~ P1~~ 16 ol:'?.
• ,
~ < < ♦ -
. ' Evaluation For
. Agency Use Only
' EWIRONItiIEN7'AL Fi F•yjEN'T'S (Continucd):
. _ . ~ '
11: , LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or gi_are will Lhe proposal produce~ WhaL time oF day would it
mainly occur?
/Vj U ffr-,
J ' .
b. Could light or gl3re frorn the fir_ished project be a saFet;i haz:Lrd or interfe:e with
views?
c. What eYisting off-site sources of light or al~re may a~~ect you: proposal.?
d. Prooosed niessures-w rzduce.or.e:OutCol light and g1arc impdCw, if a„v:, _
♦
12. R-E Cn D~t!
a. What designated 3-rid inirormal recreational opportur_ities are in the immediate vicinity?
~
b. Would the prooosed project displace anX e_cisting rec:eaiional Lses? If so, desribe.
S?o'.:ane En-.ironr-:ent.;? O:C-`i'_-_: Checir-1:st P1`° 1% o:
;
. j
. w ' ' •
. ` •
. Evaluation For
A-gency Use Only. '
B. EiWIRONMENTAL ELE:,Y1EVI'S (Continued): ,
c. Proposed measures to reduce or concrol impacu on recreation, including retreation
opporcunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
i 1cn
tv- `
13. HISTORIC AND CLrL.TURALPRESERVATION
a. Are thex e any places or objecu listed on, or proposed for, nacional, StaEt', or local
~
t '
preserva.tion re~isters, kriown to be on or ne:ct to Lne site? It so, gener:.~ll y c!ces;.noe.
A ) r v
. ~
b. Generally describe a..~ti l:~ndmarks or evidence of hisoric, a.naeological, scientific
or cultural imponance known Lo be on or ne:cz to t-he site.
Jo ~
C. PrOF'..C,S`,4 i.ie:,wlii C,i zv rrduce o. COr1Lr01 ls?ID:~~ZS~ lf ~`'i''
~q V /A-
14. TRANSPORTATION-
a. Identify public streets 3nd hiahways servin," che sice 3.nd describe proooszd access
to the exiszinc, szree: s;: stem. ShoN en site plans, if ~~y.
.
b. Is sice cur:-ntlv s:r•-e6 bv puolic transic% IE noc, whaz is the appro:umatle
. ,
to che neares: crarsit son'
YL IS
~
t
Sookane Erviro:m e:::ai O_a:-a::ce Ch:,'.-.l~st I'ag= 1 S~,; ~i
M . . . - , .
, ' ' • .
, Evaluation For
. . Agency Use Only
"B• EWIRONMENI'AL ELEME4TS (Concinued): '
. ~ ,
C- How many pazking spaces would the completed projea have? How many would the
project eliminate?
LD F::'1 a /pi I)tlA-TZ5~ J fr~ . .
d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or ir,zprovements to e:uszing roads
or streets, not includinc, driveways? If so, g_°nerall;; eescribe (indicate whecher public
or private),
e. Will the pcoject use (or occur in the immeciace vicinirf o0water, rail, or air
transportation? If so) gene: ally describe.
Hotv many. vehicula.r._I; ips.per day.would be_gene;ated b.y che comRJetPC1pr~je~?. .
If known, indicate when pea4 volumes would occur.
g. Proposed measu; es to reduce or concrol trar:sporation impacu, if any:
15. PLTBLIC SEFtiZCES
a. ``Vould the project rzsult in an increased need for puolic serrices (for exam~le:
fire protection, oolic° pro[eciiOn, he:lih ca~re, schools, other)% If so, gene::ll~ e~esc-ibe.
. ,
y
SDOn3:lc ERvlYOi1MCP.Eai Q:.;;:?i::C° CreC;11St P,iJ~ ~ C1 l•'
• " - r
. ~ ~ - • .
~
. •
~ . -
Evaluation For
Agtncy Usc- Only . •
B. ENVIRONMEN'I'AL ELEMEi11'I'S (Continued):
.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct i.mpacu on public services, if any.
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle uLilities currentlv ' able at the siLe: (elecTnnci?~ nan:ral gas-ter ser~%ice, eohon~ s setic sfstem, _h.
b. Describe the utilicies that are proposed for the project, the utiliry providul- the
service, a.nd the aener-al construcLion activities on t►-ne site or in the unmediate vicinity
'which might be neede~. ~ J,
~ ~J{i ,
~J!1t11.~ ~j 6~,
C. SIGVATURE
~
I, the undeLsigned, SRi°3r uneer the penalry of perjury thaL the aQOve resaonses are made truthf~:lly and Lo the bess of
my k.riow leda,e. I also understand that, should there be an; willful misrep; eszntation or willft_1 lack of full disclosLre
on my par, the apencv mav r.: ithdraw any dete: minacion of non-significance tnat it mi;ht issue in reliance upon tnis
checklist.
D3te: Z~ `r~ r C~•~-~.~vl/•Qhf ~S~ Gl~~ ~ SSCS
PreA
ProPonenc: Proponent:
t/ ~ / •~~:.~V
(Ple..se type or pr~nt) ( ~~ture)
Address: qml ! , ~ Ciry, State, Zip: ~/"C~/~✓~'~..~ , 7
J
~ Phone: ~ ~ % ..Szz 1~Ilti7
Person completina che form: e"`'/f Date: J- 2- Y-'00
Phone:
$po'.-:ane r,:~.•,ro~ 0-~;--._-~. ~'h~:'-1~v n,~_,,r,
~ , . .
• 4
t ' . ► J 1 i► ,
. t .
FC7R STAFF USE ONLY
_ . -
SLaff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist:
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklis-'c and other pertinenc information, the staif:
A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacu and recommends a
determination of nonsignificance (DNS)-
B. Concludes thac probable significanc adve=se environmental impacts do eYist for the current
proposal and recommends a mitigated de:ermuiation oE nonsignifcance with conditions (IIDNS).
C. Concludes thac the~ e are probable significanc adverse environmental impacts and recommends
a determination of significance (DS).
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILIti'G FEE
Spokane Environme:,trl Orci::ance Ci:ec'.~clist P~~: 21 osr ?i
/
SPOR:ANE COLTNTY 1 IISION OF BUILDIl~,T~G ANL --.OD ~
E ENFORCEMENT
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050
(509) 477-3675
~ SITE INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMA'I70N )
Site Address: 0 E LJN]EQdWN AVE Project Nttmber. 00008863 Inv; 1 Issue Datc:
SPOKANE, WA 00000 lPermit Dse: ZE-3-98 change of conditions
Parcel Number: 35233.9185
Subdivision: UNKNORIN Applicant: Jehovah's Witnesxs
Block: Lot: 4104 E. Pratt
Zoning: UR-3 UrbanResidentia13.5 Spol:ane, WA 99202 Phune: (509)535-210o
Orner: PRATI' pVE JEHOVAHS Contact:
Address: 424 9 E PR.ATTAVE
Phone:
SPOKEINE, WA 99202-5365
gSetUacl;s - Front: Lcft: Right: Rcar:
Inspector: NONE
Water Dist: LJNKNOVV-N
Gropp Name: unkno«m
Project Name:
C PExMiT(s) )
Zone ChanFe Contractor: Licenu ts:
F:NVIRONNIENTAL REYIEW S75.00 E?`Ci1vEERS\TISC REVIEW SSO.OCt
CHANCiF: OF COIv'D1110NS 8x560 $885.60 ARI:-APp CONFF.RFN;CF. SSG.OU Tnta1 Prnnit Fcr: S1.066.60
I
~ PAlfiiE'VT SUM21iARY Pagc 1 of 1 NOT"ES 1
!
PERMIT Processed By: WRIGHT, RAE
Printcd B}•: WENDEL, GLORIA
Trao Date Recei t~# Pavment Amt
09/29/2000 8336 S1,066.60
Total Fees AmountPaid AmountOwing
$1,06660 S1.066.60 $O.iili
~ i
Spokane County
Public Works Department
Divison of Building & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Number: 8336 Customer Number
Projects
Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee A»rt Inv Am1 Owinp, PAID Pmt
00008863 1 $1,066.60 $1,066.60 $1,066.60 $1,066.60 !Y
Total: $1,066.60 $1,066.60 $1,066.60 $1,066.60
Miscellaneous Items
Total PAID: $1,066.60
Tender
Type Check Arct Balance CCNbr F_px Date TENDERED
Checkl 2125 1,066.60
To1a1 TENDERED: 1,066.60
Over / (Short) $0.00
ehange $0.00
Notes:
Tran Date / Time: 09l2912000 3:57:07 PM
By: GWendel
Logon User: gwendei
Station: GWENDEL
Override By:
Printed: 0912912000 3: S7: !O P,til Page l oj l
Stairs, Steve ~ -
From: Britton, Mike
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Jones, Tammy
Cc: Ramsey, Don; Stairs, Steve; Nakagawara, Dave
Subject: Jehovah's, 4104 E Pratt, ZE-3A-98(County)
All,
After dicussion with Tammy Jones ioday, my understanding of the proposal is as follows
1)The site parcels are aggregated but retain separate assessor's parcel numbers due to separate taxing authorities.
2)The City and County will joinUy review construction permit at the appropriate times.
3)Infrastructure provision will be by the City for water, sewer, stormwater, transportation access, landscaping, and probably
building construction permit.
4)Zoning change has been approved and these changes of conditions are to enable the permitting and site construction
processes
The City Traffic engineering would like to review pnor to issuance of a construction permit the site plan. We will be looking
for standard driveways, curbing, sidewalks, parking and accessible stalls, appropriate signage, etc. (The site plan
attached to the Staff Report is not definitive enough.) We are availble for assistance to both the proponent and County
staff.
Sincerely,
Mike B.
~
Parcet: 35~'-i3 ,185
Owner; PRATT AVE .~E~,i)vA.t f ~CoOwner:
Qwner Address
4-2»9 l! I
E Pf~ATT l1V~ SP~xnNF'~v!r, ~I I
f I
Site Atltlress
o ur,f;~~~~r~ sr'v ' I~QI~_
- - ~
~
Legal Description
23-2543 PTN OF NW1/4 OF SWt/4 SEC 23 DAF: BEG AT SW COR OF NW
50DEG02MIN09SEC E 47.81FT tH S 52DEG05MIN45SEC E 29 27FT TH N 8
HA'JANA RD (WITH 35224 ~10 TAx DIST Op1p; ~
C1 ~ ~ -
~ ;~l
I I II ~,I j ~ I I J I
f I,'~
-~4-,
14th
~ .
--T
Not'ceTlus is no~ a Ieqai der,umenf (lat;) napicted on IhiS map is ~aeneral ~L stih~ec, agetu c: ~,~~~a~~; r~•a-~s~rFn. I~ ~s ~nV,rn.ie~,l
for raierenr,e ncy.
usr nnlyLFn~I r±or,umenis sl~~i~ild be Obiained (rU~n Ihe approp~~ale
, i P„ , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ j~
~ 4TH ~o' 5TH ; ► , ~ 2 M ~
~ ~ I i~H` ~°c A
O~ I n ~
~ ~ v ° ~
~ ~(1 ( ~ ~ z~A
~ 1 , . , ~ ►1e~19-ae
_ _ _ _ _ _ O I ,5 TN 6TH ~ eix H
~ O I ! !ri _ I 11r 1 ~ I ~~-QO'
~ ~ ~ P~ _ ~ s
0
I I , ` ♦ I I J ► I~ ~ M ~r~1 I
OO ( ~ 6TN ~ 7TN - v~~T
~ O , , ~f194
4 i i ~ - - - -
( I ~ V •s n~r r >If ~r/~.~.r~ ' ~ ~1 9~~
I _L ~ HARTSON _ 8TN ~ ~.N
i Q ~ , ~ ~ ~
i A p p. a~ ~
~ PR~N~ -----~rH ~AVF ~ ~ j
9
j s~G S ~ ~ ~s ~
I ~ p~ ~ ~ '
~ s BTN AVf. ' ~
~ ~
r-------- J ~
~
I~
I P P Q~Ab covn~rRiw
i p p E 9TH AVE. Q N.,~ a~ ti~
~ s
, PP~~ ~ a~. . 4,~~ti~
~ ~
' ~
r O l6lF.9~ . ~~~~.~'i~T~
r.__._________________-....___~ITNAVF 0 ~tIl~. ~l~i~~ 111~~~ I
~
~ r •
NoCiNe~/w ~ritN•~ .~r,.,,.~ ri.n~i
~ t THIqTCI!N
~ 1f )f, Je! ~"r r
I I ~ /2 TH : 1~L..~ ~
I O ~ ~ i,
I O r~ h
\ • r~.
~ ~ S p.oo ~R ~.---N~i~n-ao-,~~-pTpi~aoo ~ FOURTEE
~ ~ ~ r., 2 ~ er ,r, i~~ c,.
I
~ ~ l3TH J~ ~.1~_i ~
~ ~E :
, ~
~ .1 rr k• • ~r, ~ FlFreeNrN
, pR ~ „k,
, T~D : yf ? .
~ 22 ~ ,
22c, 23 ~
I4~H . , . . ~ •
- - ( - - - ~ ~ ° a ar. - - - - - - - .^i C{ _ .tis 1l~I .iw ~ ' i~,..r~
27 27 2s 27 s~ ~
.
~cRiPr~oN ~ er '
S£P!A r0 L/NfN ~ C RAY
ARlMGM'/)~ol N•v/YE.P ~QB' y~ C
.
~-,-r~, I
« - - ~
y • J t ~ a. ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ rr/~, ~ ~ Z 1 ~~j.~M, - "
' ~ • • L I L i ~ ! ~ + l 1 • 1 t ~ A t • ~u J N~/
9 3 ~
2 T .~S
I - ~ „
, ~
I r~3 6 ' ,
K
: I * ~ ~
T+• w A ii it f • tl7 / a 7 1• i. ~i~ I IVS 259 -000._ ~r~ f~ s Pi •b S A $ STa.w~:1At ~
, ~ ~ ~ • • ' - - - • - 'r ? F.
~ ~ . . F. / • ~ i • • i.` r ■ 4 u,yri al s 0 I7It Ir a 7
I
~ ~ ~ d _.L,~l ~ - - - - -
!►'A' t
_ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~
7 / • I~ n I
~ ` • ^ L1J ~
, I • j C ~ ~ w ~
1 n~y* ° r TENTM
~.J
/17 4 1 • - •
i~~C
~ ~ 1--
- ~
~ • II / • 1 ' • • ~ r~
~
I63F.9~ ~ I i
I Tv_KLFTH ~
-AV E~.,~ , -
.t. ~ . ~ ~ sir . rai ' i cs•~s:. •~_-'1
. ~ I
O ~-s ~-sse ~
~ i
v
► • ! r~ s ♦ • n, u .f' 7 . ,i a l n s .I~~r~,sa
• w n
~ t . ~ c !+y 9~ _ TNIRTEt-NTH
~ ~ ~ , - ~ • i
T. ^ Q•I ~ ~ a ~ ! t~ t~ ~ a ~ ~
~ ' ~ a! • ~ ~ .
- ~ ~ i ' .
~ 1~ } 'a r • M • ~ W r • • ~ • ro „ p fi
47%
.~o Lp ' , Goa-auo=t~q-PIw•7 no P FOURTEENTM p ` ;•G
~ s f s 'j • a Z 1 c ~ f r~ W41 s•♦• r J/
' • ~ 1~---W F" ! `~',Z. 0~~~ ~t. ~ y.~_J
_s .(~:~T-f~~(TTT r l~f~yl-iTP1~T13F1~"i 1~1°Z 1
~
4TH kc q_ 5TH ~ FTM = M P..y.
~ 1o I ~ r - ~ TM i
C~ ~ , . , , ►n1~a-~e ~1 ~
rH'Nft 6TN ~ - nc N
1 ~ V(
~ I ~ ~ • ,/I / I~N i
I ~
00 I ~ C) 6TN ~ 7TN sev ~ • '
OC~ h r.,~~ c, ~ .l~
011194 ~
NARTSON B Tl~ s
i ~ , ~ ; ; .
p Q t~
i App. .
, m
~ R~NG -----7 rH ~avE 9 ~ m .
i ~ G s P 'a-
B i A O p
~ i 8TN A V£. ~ ~ •
I1 ~ r
P Q~l~ r.OYJ/ ~ t .
~ C Here
9TN AVf.
OTK AV£
~-,flTNA'VF ~t~/~~ ~i•r~i I1~•I~i 1•~!
~ na c»r Riw
H/f~ 1~ •n ui 7/v NU a I Xr I
THIara:NnH
~ 10 12 TN
I I / I• ~ N N
I o•oo ~R -...,~.~-w.i~~~.~~p`._,aTni~,foo r FOURTEENTM
\ • 1 slf ~t .r. !~i s.frr ~rc .r
ri~ 13TN J 'JT" T-1 r,
r o
V +I r q,r r b~~ ~
~ OR k,:. •~r~+ ►~FraeNrM~
.f
T
\ 2 2 I! ~ 110f!♦ 71 • 7I I Iff/ ~ ,t/ I•~~~~r / ~ 4
iqrH 22~ 23 ._717-~--
~ I ~ ~ ~ r r _ A Y 7~ ~
27 27 26 27 6
R! P TlON BY
r2EVISED
£P/A TO L/NEN C RAY ~ . , ~•r
aveaar~,l cr~.v~rE-~r Q~• ~ c~ ~.Q r ~
•
t
~ ~ 't~ct •t~1Le~~~..~1w~~
' ~ , y ~
~
f.
'i w
~ ~ i. f'
' 1
. - j '•i 1 ~ ~ 4'.
d~~o y~~~».,~ ~ `~'tt 1 ~R
~ f `
. ;q' ' w~ ~ _ ~ .
. ~ .
~ <
, . .
, . . s,~i_- .:1~~.1 ~ ~ y.~.
5
' ~ , aE , .
~ ,
' y " ~l ' a: 1 h _
~ ,
,
~ ~
1 ~i - -
.s.: ~r , . _ -
. .
~ >
.ir 6 . . 1' ~ ' .
-
o~ " ' ' y , ' . y , ilc
~1? ~ r ~ r ~ y . ' ~ .~a~ ~ ~ M ~ lk,r r - '
L 'P ~ i ~F Y., ~ F~ ';`'~~1 ~ . ~ 'F. . t - a` . ,~,Y _~~'d
~ } I~F ' pp~~~ ~ T'1 ~ ~~,~y. ~ - . ~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ :..f~ I ~ .
. ' ,
, . i i .
y' ; e~ ~ ~ w y,
~ ~,d ~ ~W
.1 ~
~ -
a
~ ~
, ~ # ~
,
_ ~ ;9
. . r.,,a.,
..t ~
.
,
~
~
. ,
. , -
, ' ~ ► , , ~ i~
. . ' . -
• . ; L , ..ti, ' '
s . r
~
~~F
.S
Z,x d e l,s,~ . S
. . . _ . , -
~
, ' ~ . ~ -
„ ~
. , . , „ ,
_ '
~ i~t t ~ -
° > ~ ~ ~
, r , Y , .
, ~ ; . ~
~
A r _
~ _
.,v. ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . . .
~v-
_
,C•~.. : .