ZE-130-84
'I y s
~ ' , • f -N-m9%~': C~f
;
~ , PLANNING DEPARTMENT
t , - _
~
~
dN.AUwAr CENTNE BuiLOIHG ti 721 jEPrEA:,ON STREET
0•40NE 356•2205
~ •1 1 ] .l~H . i. .
SPOKANE OVA$MINCrTON 99260
March 15, 1985
T0: Board of Spokane County Commissioners
FROM: Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Committee AcALions of March 7, 1985.
Gentlemen:
On March 7, 1985, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M., to
consider four new zone reclassification applications and one change of conditions
application. One additional change of c (nditions application was withdrawn by
the applicant. Members present: Mrs. Myers,• Chairperson, Mrs. Tennican and
Mr. Skals tad.
,
Following are the applications in sequence and the action taken by the Conmittee.
If not appealed, these decisions will become final on March 25, 1985. Al1 Find-
ings and 0 rder for this hearing were signed on March 14, 1985.
1) ZE-59B-81, Change of Conditions in the Freeway Commercial Zone
and
VE-205-84a Variance from the Setback ReQuirements of the Freewa,y Commercial
Zone: Gunning Location: Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue, approximately
150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44.
Pruposal: Addition of 14-Units to an existing Motel
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
The Zoning Adjustor also approved the requested Variance to
allow a 32-foot f rom Cataldo Avenue, whereas Section
4.08A.050-(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires
a 50-foot setback.
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban
and
. VE- 1-85, Variance from the Frontage Requirement of the Multiple FamilY
Suburban Zone: Finch
Location: Generally located no rtheast of the intersection of Woodlawn Dr-
and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43.
Proposal: 40-Unit Apartment Complex
Actinn• Approval for a 35-Jnit Apartment Coiiiplex. (Uote: 3- 0)
( COf1t1 nue,J'
, -
' ~ .
Zaning Hearing Examiner Comnittee Actions of March 7, 1985 (continued)
2) ZE-130-84 A ricultural to Multi le Famil Suburban and VE-1-85 Variance
Request from the Frontage Requirement continued
The Hearing Examiner Committee was concerned with the
proposed density of the project and its compatibility with
the existing multi-family developments in the imnediate area.
The Zoning Adjustor approved the requested Variance to allow
an apartment complex on a lot with 30-feet of public road
frontage, whereas Section 4,07.060 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requires 90-feet of frontage. (note: The
applicant has additional trontage through a private easement.)
3) ZW-132B-78, Change of Conditions in the Mining Zone: Central Pre-Mix Concrete
Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Fort Wright Road,
and approximately 1,600 feet easterly of the intersection of
Fort Wright Road and Government Way in Section 11-25-42.
Action: Withdrawal Accepted. (Vote: 2- 0)
The application was withdrawn by the applicant by a letter
dated February 14, 1985.
4) ZE-106-84, Agricultural Suburban to Commercial: East Bannen Properties Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue
and Bannen Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal: Retail Building
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
5) ZE-120-$4, Agricultural to Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban:
Wyatt
Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to the intersection of
Buckeye Avenue and Pines Road in Section 10-25-44.
Proposal: 270-Unit Multi-Family Complex
Action: Approval for the Multiple Family Suburban Zone at a density
of 9 dwelling units per acre (Site Size - Approximately 14.54
' Acres). The Residential Office Zone request was denied.
(Vote: 3 - 0)
The Hearing Examiner Committee felt that the proposal was too
dense for the advertised property north of the Freeway, con-
sidering the impacts to the Aquifer and the uncertainty as to
timing of availability of sewers in the area; therefore, it
was felt that the dwelling units allowed should be reduced in
number. The Residential Office Zone request wzs denied as
future use for offices does not appear practical at this time
• until an areawide sewer would be more readily available.
- 2 - (continued)
.
' ' •
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIUN NO.: ZE-130-84
VAkIANCE NO.: VE- 1-85
SNOKANE CUUNTY .
NEARIN6 EXAMINER COMMITTEE
F INU INGS AND OkUER
A. INTRUUUC1iUN .
Thi s matter havi ng come before the Zoni ng Neari ng Exami ner Commi ttee on
March 7, 1985, and the members of the Committee present being
Jane E. M(yers, Chai rperson, F. Lynn Tenni can and Ri chard L. Skal stad.
B. PRUPOSAL
7he sponsor, Gordon Fi nch, i s requesti ng approval of a zone recl assi fi cati on, Fi 1 e No. ZE-13U-84, Agri cul tural to Mul ti pl e Fami ly
Suburban, for the purpose of devel opi ng a 40-Uni t Apartment Comp) ex; and a
request for a Yari ance. YE-1-85, to a11 ow an apartment compl ex en n 1 ot
wi th 3U-feet of publ i c road f rontage, whereas Secti on 4. U7. U60 of the
Spokane County Zoni ng Ordi nance requi res 9U-feet of frontage. (The
applicant has additional frontage through a private easement.)
C. F INU INGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is Central Park Condominium,
si ngl e fami 1y resi denti al and vacant.
2. That the Comprehensi ve P1 an desi gnates thi s area as appropri ate for
Urban development.
3. That the exi sti ng zoni ng of the property descri bed i n the appl i c8ti on
i s Agri cul tural .
4. That the prvvisions of RCw 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy
Act ) have been compll ed wi th, and the Comni ttee concurs wi th the
Decl arati on of Non-Si gni fi cance.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda
Item have been fulfilled.
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or
uses within the proposed Zone Classification.
,
,
.
, t Y
, • .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-84
C. FINOINGS UF FACT (continued)
7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have
substanti al 1y changed si nce the ori gi nal zoni ng of thi s area and
accordi ngly, the proposed rezone i s justi fied.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. .
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the '
proposed use.
lU. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in
harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise
. detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
11. The fol 1 owi ng are addi ti onal fi ndi ngs of fact consi dered by the
Hearing Examiner Committee:
D ISCUSS ION : • ~ '
Skalstad:
- The subject si te i s surrounded by simi 1 ar zoni ng as that
requested for the proposed development.
- That the Comprehensive Plan recommends easy access to arterials
from Mul ti pl e Fami 1y Suburban proj ects.
- That the Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee i s concerned about the
proposed densi ty of thi s project i n rel ati onshi p to the ad,j acent
density of 12.8 units per acre for the Central Park Condominium
project and the uncertai nty of sewers bei ng avai 1 abl e to thi s
si te. In addi ti on, the Heari ng Exami ner Comni ttee i s concerned
that allowing maximum density on this site without existing
sewer hook-up may reduce the developer's incentive and the
avai 1 abi 1 i ty of bonus densi ty i n the future for projects wi th
sewer hook-ups.
- It appears that this site is suited for multi-family development
but that the issue appears to be that of density.
Tennican:
- lt is reasonable to understand the applicant's desire to
maximize his development potential for this site, but the
Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee must al so consi der the rel ated
impacts to a neighborhood; i.e., that of a single access point,
i ncreased densi ty and traffic, and the fact of si ngle fami ly
character west of Fancher.
2
,
~ [UNt RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
C. FINDINGS UF FACT (continued)
U ISCUSS IUN ( conti nued ) Tennican (continued)
- The proposal should be viewed as an area of transition, and the density would be greater than its counterpart, Central Park-, and
the surrounding residential area. •
- There is a need to protect the Aquifer and an alternate
drainfield plan hasn't been submitted in the event the current
one fails and needs a replacement. Also, the timing of sewers
i n thi s area i s uncertai n.
. ~yers:
- That in all probability the proposed site would not develop into
a single family residential area because of land costs and the
adj acent condominium development.
- Density would be more compatible at 35 units rather than the
requested 40. _
- The Health District needs to do proper percolation tests for
soi 1 sui tabi 1 i ty.
- If the application is approved, Fancher should be paved.
D. CONUITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPRUYAL
(A11 Condi ti ons imposed by the Zoni ng Heari ng Exami ner Commi ttee shal 1 be
bi ndi ng on the "Appl i cant", whi ch term shal 1 i ncl ude the owner or owners
of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors.)
1. That the tests as conducted by the Mealth District for the
drai nfi el ds may requi re further admi ni strati ve reducti on i n the
amount of units from the 35 units approved at this public hearing.
2. Fancher Road shall be paved as requested by the County Engineering
Department, i ncl udi ng si dewal ks on Fancher.
3. That residents shall be willing to participate in a RID for the
- improvement of Woodlawn, should someone desire to circulate a
petition.
4. That a redesign of the southeast boundary should be contemplated to
the proposed building to make it blend into the existing Central
Park's design. 3
ti
~ "[ONE REGLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE NU. VE- 1-85
a) CUUNTY PLANNING UEPARTMtNT
1. That a 15-foot dense landscaped strip and a 6-foot wooden
sight-obscuring fence be provided along the west property line.
Within the landscape strip, 12 - 15-foot trees planted 25-feet
apart shall also be provided.
2. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of '
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties).
A
3. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
mai ntenance acceptabl e to the Spokane County Zoni ny
Admi ni strator shal 1 be submi tted wi th a performance bond for the
project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall
be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access
poi nts i s not obscured or i mpai red.
4. The applicant shall develop subject property generally_in
accordance wi thi n the concept presented to the heari ng Exami ner
Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator
will be permitted, including, buit not limited to the following
changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general
allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must
conform to regul ati ons set forth i n the Spokane County Zoni ng
Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be mai ntai ned.
5. The specific development plan will be submitted for Planning
Department review and approval prior to issuance of building
permi ts.
6. All current standards of the Multiple Family Suburban Zone, as
amended, shall be complied with in the development of this
site.
7. That the project i s subject to •Section 4.16A.050, the Aqui fer
Sensi ti ve Area Over1 ay Zone of the Spokane County Zoni ng
Urdinance, which sets forth various measures for Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
4
' .
ZONt RECLASSIFICATIUN N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
a) COUNTY PLANNING UEPARTMENT (continued)
8. Appl i cant shal 1 comply wi th 208' recomnendati ons concerni ng
stormwater runoff and provi de necessary 1 andscapi ng for runof'f.
9. Ary di vi si on of 1 and for the purpose of sal e, 1 ease or transfer,,
shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting
Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. .
lU. That the provisions of SEPA's NUTICE OF ACTION pursuant to •
Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County
Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project
appl i cant wi thi n thi rty (30) days of fi nal di sposi ti on of thi s
application, and prior to any on-site improvements.
11. Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW, the SEPA
Guidelines (WAC 197-1U) and the Spokane County Enviro rnnental Ordi nance ( SCEO a proposed decl arati on of non-si gni fi cance has
been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to this date; the
official file, written comments and/or public testimory contain
information regarding assessment of the proposal's likely
significant adverse impacts to the physical environment; a
fi ndi ng i s hereby made that no probabl e si gni fi cant adverse
impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a
resul t of the project; and a fi nal decl arati on of
non-significance is hereby to be issued.
12. That the building placement on-site shall be located on the
north and east property 1 i nes away from the resi dences on the
south and west as far as possible.
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Pri or To The Issuance Of A Bui 1 di ng Permi t:
l. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be
obtained from the Spokane County Engineer.
2. Applicant shall improve Fancher Road in a manner consistent with
Spokane County TYPICAL roadway'section No. 1 minimum paving
width Access Standard. 3. Roadway improvements along Fancher shall be constructed from the
proposed driveway approach (Private Drive access to Fancher) to
Eighth Avenue.
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the property.
5
• ~ .
. .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VAKIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
,
b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued)
5. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
pl an for the enti re project prior to the i ssuance of any
building permit on the property. 6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted'
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance wi th standard traffi c engi neeri ng practi ces. Pavi ng
or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be
requi red for any porti on of the proj ect whi ch i s to be occupi ed
or traveled by vehicles. ,
7. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the
property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. .
8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
9. Al l requi red improvements sha11 conform to the current State of
Washi ngton Standard Speci fi cati ons for Road and Bri dge
Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwi se approved by the County Engi neer.
lU. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners'
ftesolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this
proposal.
11. This plat or development proposal is located within a drainage
basi n which has been f denti fied by the Spokane County Engi neer's
Office as having stormwater runoff problems. Since this plat or
development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to
stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the
pl anni ng and impl ementati on of a future basi nwi de stormwater
management system. The following "Condition of Approval" shall
be required: That the owner(s) or successor(s) in interest
agree to join in ary County approved Stormwater Management
Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed
through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the
pl anni ng,. desi gn, constructi ng, mai ntai ni ng, or operati on of
storniwater control faci 1 i ti es.
6
. , ~ 9
, ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NU. ZE-130-84
VARIANGE N0. ZE- 1-85
c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. .
80-0418, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authori zed. Thi s authori zati on i s condi ti oned on compl i ance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Nealth
Uistrict and is further conditioned and subject to specific - appl i cati on approval and i ssuance, of permi ts by the heal th Di stri ct. 2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULIU by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
peti ti on i ncl udes the Owner(s) property and further not to
obj ect by the si gni ng of a protest peti ti on agai nst the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this
condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from
objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a re5ult of
i mprovements cal 1 ed for i n conj uncti on wi th the formati.on of a
ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for thi s project shal l be provided i n
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. Each unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future
areawide collection systems.
5. Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
, reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department.
d) COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT
1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
be approved by the County Engi neer and the heal th Di stri ct pri or
to the i ssuance of ary bui 1 di ng permi t for thi s project.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Uirector of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Nealth Ufficer, the use of an on-site sewage disposal
, system may be authorized.
7
. • . .
. ' .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIUN N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
d) CUUNTY HEALTN D IS'f R ICT ( conti nued )
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County. .
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. ,
6. Use of private wells and water sy stems is prohibited.
7. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces is currently
prohi bi ted.
e) CUUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT .
1. The site is located in Fire District # 1.
2. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to-be
installed prior to any construction. These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exterior is more than
175 feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of
the hydrant shall be no less than 18 inches above grade. A
water pl an showi ng each fi re hydrant ( speci fyi ng the gal 1 ons per
mi nute for each fi re hydrant) and meeti ng the requi rements i n
Chapter 10.04 of the Uni form Fi re Code i s requi red pri or to
construction of the water service. All required fire protection
facilities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and
during the time of construction.
3. Where it is desired to have access control gates in residential
developments, the following shall apply:
The minimum width of roadway, inside of access gate, shall be
twelve (12) feet. There shall be at least two (2) such drive
approaches where the gates are located. One may be used for
vehicles exiting. Tire flatting spikes shall not be used unless
the entrance i s a mi nimum of twenty (20) feet wi de. The gates
shall be provided with an appoved method of emergency operation
in accordance with the fire department standards. Where each
drive approach is less than twenty (20) feet in width and
controlled by gates, a secondary means of access shall be
provided with a clear, twenty (20) foot unobstructed opening.
8
• ' a .
. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIUN N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
e) COUNTY BUILDING ANU SAFETY DEPARTMENT lcontinuedl .
4, Each structure shall be accessible to Fire Department apparatus by way of access roadways wi th al l-weather dri vi ng surface -
capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. Th6
mi nimum paved roadway wi dth, i nsi de curb face to i nsi de curb
face, shall be twenty-four (24) feet with no parking. Parallel
parki ng i s permi tted on one si de wi th road wi dths a mi ni mum of
thirty (30) feet. Parallel parking is permitted on both sides
wi th road wi dths a mi ni mum of thi rty-si x (36) feet. Si gns
. noti ng such i s requi red for f i re 1 ane. 7he turni ng radi us of
pri vate roadways and dri ve ai sl es shal l be a mi ni mum of twenty
(20) feet i nsi de and a mi ni mum of forty-fi ve (45) feet outsi de
to the curb face. Cul de sacs more than six hundred (600) feet
from the center 1i ne of the nearest cross street shall .have a
mi ni mum radi us of thi rty-seven (37) feet, si x (6) i nches • (75
feet diameter).
5. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and
exi sti ng bui 1 di ngs i n such a posi ti on as to be pl ai nly vi si bl e
and 1 egi bl e f rom the street o r road f ronti ng the property. Sai d
numbers shall contrast with their background.
6. Trash enclosures shall not be located ad,jacent to combustible
constructi on or underneath wi ndows or nonprotected eaves.
7. A land use permit will be required for each structure.
f) WATER PURVEYOR
1. Water Purveyor is Spokane Suburban Water Company, and they wi11
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses; however, satisfactory arrangements to serve
this proposal have not been made.
9
• a .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTIUN CONTROL AUTHORITY
l. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during -
demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled.
Thi s may requi re use of water sprays, tarps, spri nkl ers, or . suspensi on of acti vi ty duri ng certai n weather condi ti ons. Naul
roads shoul d be treated and emi ssi ons from the transfer of '
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from '
al l other constructi on rel ated acti vi ti es.
2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracki ng or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measu res must be taken
imnediately to clean these surfaces.
3. Al l travel led surfaces (i ngress, egress, parki ng areas, access
roads) must be paved and kept clean.
4. It has been determined that fireplaces and wood stoves are a
significant source of suspended particulates. The small
particlet (L lO(nicrons) are respirable and can have an adverse
effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if
wood stoves/fireplaces are used, that burning be done as
efficiently as possible. All wood should be seasoned and stored
in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated
air pollution levels, we request that use of wood stoves and
fireplaces be discontinued.
5. Some obj ectionable odors will likely result during the
constructi on phase of the proj ect and f rom motor vehi cl es usi ng
the si te fol l owi ng compl eti on of the proj ect and from occupants
of the proposed project. -
6. All air pollution regulations must be met.
7. Additio nal Comments:
We request denial of the proposed project unless Woodlawn Drive
from 8th Avenue to Fancher and Fancher from 8th Avenue to
Woodlawn Drive are paved.
lU
r . ZONE RECLASS IF ICATION N0. ZE-1:30-84
VAkIANCE NU. VE- 1-85
E. ORDER .
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the appl icati on of Gordon Fi nch, for a zone recl assi fi cati on as descri bed in the application should be APPROVED for a 35-Unit Apartment Complex: Motion to Approve by: Skalstad
1. That the project be approved but limited to a total of 35-units,
whi ch i s subj ect to sui tabl e soi 1 s and compl i ance wi th sewage
disposal regulations. Should the soils prove not to be
adequate, then an admi ni strati ve reducti on i n uni ts may,be
necessary.
2. That Fancher be paved with sidewalks and that this site shall
parti ci pate for a RID when peti ti oned for Woodl awn Ori-ve:
Access to Woodl awn Dri ve by tenants wi thi n thi s project shoul d
be discouraged.
3. That the reduction of 5-units shall be accomplished by reducing
the impacts along the south and east property lines; i.e., may
resul t i n 1 i mi ti ng the structure hei ght to 1-1/2 stori es.
Seconded by: Tennican
Yote : Skal stad - qye
Tennican - Aye
Mye rs - Aye
Unanimous to APPROVE the Multiple Family Suburban
Zoning for a 35-Unit Apartment Complex. (3 - 0)
11
. ~
t► .
, t
ZONE ItECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
YARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
E. ORDER (continued) •
KEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, URDER, AND VUTE /
ir n ~
,
Al"TEST :
Fo r WALLIS U. HUBBARD
Planning Di rector
.
d:~Y/
~ ~
By STEVE P. ORUB UWSK1
Zoni ng Admi ni strator
/
oate : 12'~d
NOTE:
See Fi 1 e VE-1-85 for the Zoni ng Adj ustor deci si on on Vari ance request for
approval for rel axati on of the publ i c road f rontage requi rement of the
adverti sed property as requi red by the Spokane County Zoni ng Ordi nance.
12
R E C E I V E D
~ - .
Qb23
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY C0MMI SS IONERS OF S f 0 K A N E C 0 U iV I Y
S P OK A N E C O U N T Y, M A S H I N G T O N R• qNN i N G D E P A R T M ENT
IN THE MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSI- ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION
FICJITION, ZE-130-84. AGRICULTURAL ) AND CONDITIONS
TO MULTIPIE FAMILY SUBURBAN.
APPLICANT: FINCH )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideratlon by the Board of County
Caaai ssi oners of Spokane County, herel nafter referred to as the 'Board' of an
appeal of Spokane County Zoni ng Neari ng Exami ner Camii ttee Deci si on of
March 14, 1985, approving the zone reclassification (ZE-130-84). Agricultural
to Multiple Family Suburban, for the purpose of developing a 40-Unit Apartment
Compl ex hereinafter referred to as the 'Proposal' ; and a Yarlance request
before the Zoni ng Adjustor to al l or+ sai d apartment campl ex on a 1 ot w1 th
30-feet of publ i c road f rontage, whereas the Spokane County Zoni ng Ordi nance
requi res 90-feet of frontage. The Board of County Conmi ssioners of Spokane
County having held a publlc hearing on May 149 1985, and having fully
consi dered al l testirtwny presented thereat,, and further havi ng i nd1 v1 dual ly
vi si ted wi th the si te and vici ni ty i n questi on, and havi ng rendered a deci si on
on the 11 th day of J une, 1985, APPROV ING i n part and DEH IED 1 n part sai d
proposal, does hereby make the following:
F INO IH6S OF FACT
1. That the proposal i s general ly 1 ocated northeast of the
i ntersecti on of Woodl awn D ri ve and Fancher Road i n Secti on 2445-43,
2. That the proposal consi sts of a 1.92-Acre parcel of 1 and
requesti ng a zone change f rom Agri cul tural to Mul ti pl e Fam11y Suburban for the
purpose of developing a 40-Unit Apartment Complex.
3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land
Use Plan lndicates Urban usage of the area encompassed by the proposal xhich
recoinoends hi gher densi ty projects be 1 ocated wi th near di rect access to a
maJor arteri al , be near publlc transi t routes, serve as a transi ti onal use
between s1 ngl e faaii 1y resi denti al and irore 1 ntensl ve uses, and proeote fi 11-1 n
devel opaent.
4. That the provisi ons of RCW Chapter 43.21C, (State Env1 roniaental
Po11cy Act ) have been compl i ed w1 th and the Board concurs wi th the Near1 ng
Exami ner Camii ttee' s i ssuance of a decl arati on of non- si gni f 1 cance.
.
5. That the Spokane County Neari ng Exami ner Canai ttee hel d a pub11 c
heaM ng on March 7. 1985, concerni ng the proposal, subsequent to ►+hich by
Findings of Fact, Oeclsion and Order dated March 14, 1985, they approved the
3roposal subject to certai n condi ti ons whi ch reduced the number of un1 ts to
5, that Fancher Road be paved and sidewalked, and that the projett iaay De
redesigned to better blend into the Central Park development.
6. That the ex1 sti ng 1 and uses i n the area of proposal i ncl ude
si ngl e fami 1y resi dences. the Central Pa ric Condomi ni um project, and
undeveloped land.
7. That the proposal 1 s caapati bl e wi th exi st1 ng uses i n the area.
8. That the proposal 1 s not detrimental or otherwl se hannful to the ~
public health, safety and welfare.
9. That the applicant has demonstrated changed conditions since
the original zone chan9e warranting a zone chan9e fran Agricultural to
Mul ti pl e Fami 1y Suburban; namely: the Central Park Condomi nm project, sewer
availability to the proposal, and the adoption of the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan.
10. That the proposal is consistent with the surroundin9 land use
cl assif i cati ons and does not grant a speci al pri vi 1 ege or ri ghts to the
applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property ormers.
11. That the Board flnds that the proposal is located withln the
recorded water service area of Spokane SuDurban Water Company; and that the
District indicates there is an adequate system capacity, and that they are
desi rous of servi ng the proposal for domestic, fi re and i rri 9ati on purpo:es.
_ J
. . ~ ss e523
FINDIN6S OF FACT, DECISION ANO CONDITIONS ZE-130-84 2
12. That the proposal i s si tuated wi thi n the recorded fire service
area of Fire District # 1.
13.. That the proposal 11es r+ithin the boundaries of Spokane School
District # 81. ,
14. That the appellant among other items raised concerns, at the
public hearing before the Board, about the height of structures, sewerage
concerns and si dewal k requi rement. The approval of this proposal as
condi ti oned herei n, adequately addresses these concerns.
15. That with regards tothe requested Yariance before the Zoning
Adjustor, the Board has no jurisdiction in that matter and makes no findings
as to the meri ts of the request.
16. That the proper 1 egal requi rements for adverti si n9 of the
hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County have been
met.
17. That on the llth day of J une, 1985, the Board of County
Cortmissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did APPROYE in part and
DENY i n part the proposal sub3 ect to certai n condi ti ons.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department
Staff Report dated March 7, 1985, and the Staff presentation of File No.
ZE-130-84, the 8oard hereby in APPROYING in part and DENYING in part, the
proposal does make the fol l owi ng conditions:
,
CONDITIONS
1. That the conditions set forth in the Spokane County Zoniny
Hearing Examiner staff analysis dated March 14, 1985, on pages 1 through 12,
are hereby adopted as condi ti ons of approval subject to the fol 1 owi ng
amendments:
2. That the proposal is approved for a 40-Unit Apartment Complex.
3. That the Apartment Complex shall be connected to the County's
sexerage system and shall not be allowed on-site sewage disposal.
4. That the area desi gnated as an on-si te drai nfi el d for the project as ori gi nal ly desi gned may be used for the addi ti onal 5-Un1 ts as
approved i n the Decisi on. .
5. The hei ght of the structures shal l be 1 imi ted as fol1 or+s:
Two Stori es al ong the East porti on of *the si te.
Three stori es al ong the North porti on of the si te.
One story along the Nest portion of the site.
6. That the devel oper shal l be responsi bl e for pavi ng and curbi ng
Fancher Road to include sidewalks along the east side of Fancher Road as well
as participating on a pro-rata basis for the paving and curbing of Woodlawn.
DA7E0 This dey of 198&.'
,
. 60AR0 OF COUNTY COMM ISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUHTY, wASHINGTON
.
ATTEST:
WILLIAM E. DONAHUE C1 erk of the Bo rd
By:
Deputy
I sPO'fr►NE c~UNTY COMMiSSIo~~~~
~ATM IhA24 4 ~ .
T#3; c3 =Essoq
0 A[J Ot7O R
0 dUlLL?1NQ COQ~ ~ SAFETY
CX BUILDING MAINTENAMCE
Q CLEA F4
C3 Gt) AA 1Mli! t,i N ITY SEA'Vt CES
0 QATIN 1C"P C~"J ~.I '
ti1NEERS
t7 F~€ALTH D1~i~C"T
{'~u J[TiYENlLE COUflT
C: PARK& RECREATI Q IV
0 PERSONNEL
13 P'LANN1NG
• PR1N7' SHOP
P'R~~UTO'R
C]
II
P#J BL1C ~EN D EiR
❑
E] PURCHASiHG
CI 3HEA1Ff
C] SrATE EXAlhA IN ER
CJ SURiERIOR COLJR7
Q SYSTIEMS SER'IIiGES
* TR EASUR ER
0 UTIL!7IES
0 OTHEit
❑ 9-1-1
FOR 1fOUR: q~
0 IlMFORMAT'FON
E2 AG"TtON Cl REPCY TOc 0 StJP'RI.Y YERSAL
rNlORMATION T'O BOAAD.
l~
i
Q523
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSI- ) FINDINGS OF FACT, DECISION
FICATION, ZE-130-849 AGRICULTURAL ) AND CONDITIONS
TO MULTIPLE FANIILY SUBURBAN.
APPLICANT: FINCN )
THIS MATTER, Being the consideration by the Board of County
Conmi ssi oners of Spokane County, herei nafter referred to as the "Board' of an
appeal of Spokane County Zoning Hearing Exarniner Coamittee Decision of
March 14, 1985, approving the zone reclassification (ZE-130-84), Agricultural
to Multiple Family Suburban, for the purpose of developin9 a 40-Unit Apartrnent
Corapl ex hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal" ; and a Yariance request
before the Zoning Adjustor to allow said apartment complex on a lot with
30-feet of public road frontage, whereas the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
requi res 90-feet of frontage. The 6oard of County Conmi ssioners of Spokane
County having held a public hearing on May 14, 1985, and having fully
consi dered al l testimony presented thereat, and further havi ng 1 ndi vi dual ly
vi si ted with the si te and vici ni ty i n questi on, and havi ng rendered a deci si on
on the llth day of J une, 1985, APPROYING in part and DENIED in part said
proposal, does hereby make the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the proposal is generally located northeast of the
intersecti on of Woodl awn Dri ve and Fancher Road i n Secti on ZA--25--43,
2. That the proposal consists of a 1.92-Ac re parcel of land
requesting a zone change from Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban for the
purpose of developing a 40-Unit Apartment Complex.
3. That the adopted Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Land
Use Plan indicates U rban usage of the a rea encompassed by the proposal which recomnends hi gher densi ty projects be 1 ocated wi th near d1 rect access to a
major arteri al , be near publ i c transi t routes, serve as a transi ti onal use
between single family residential and na re intensive uses, and promote fill-in
development.
4. That the provi si ons of RCtiI Chapter 43. 21 C, (State Envi romental
Policy Act) have been complied with and the 8oard concurs with the Hearing
Examiner Cortmittee's issuance of a declaration of non- signlficance.
.
5. That the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Conmittee held a public
hearing on March 7, 1985, concerning the proposal, subsequent to which by
Findings of Fact, Decision and Order dated March 14, 1985, they approved the
proposal subj ect to certai n condi ti ons whi ch reduced the number of uni ts to
35, that Fancher Road be paved and sidewalked, and that the project may be
redesigned to better blend into the Central Park development.
6. That the exi sti ng 1 and uses i n the area of proposal i ncl ude
singl e fami ly resi dences, the Central Park Condomi ni um project, and
undeveloped land.
7. That the proposal 1 s compati bl e wi th exi sti ng uses i n the area.
8. That the proposal is not detrimental or otherwise ha mful to the
publ ic heal th, safety and wel fare.
9. That the applicant has demonstrated changed conditions slnce
the original zone change warranting a zone change fran Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban; namely: the Central Park Condominum pro3ect, seNer
availability to the proposal, and the adoption of the Spokane County
Comprehensi ve P1 an.
10. That the proposal is consistent with the surrounding land use
classifications and does not grant a special privilege or rights to the
applicant different than those enjoyed by adjacent property orvners.
11. That the Board finds that the proposal is located within the
recorded water service area of Spokane Suburban Water Company; and that the
District indicates there is an adequate system capacity, and that they are
desi rous of servi ng the proposal for domestic, fi re and i rri gati on purposes.
~
85 e523 •
~
r I . .
~ i: ' •
FINDINGS OF FAC7, DECISION AND CONDITIONS ZE-130-84 2
12. That the proposal i s si.tuated wi thi n the recorded fi re service
area of Fi re Di strict # 1. .
13. That the proposal lies within the boundaries of Spokane School
District # 81. ,
14. That the appellant among other items raised concerns, at the
public hearing before the Board, about the height of structures, sewerage
concerns and sidewalk requirement. The approval of this proposal as
conditioned herein, adequately addresses these concerns. _
15. That with regards to the requested Variance before the Zoning
Ad,justor, the Board has no j urisdiction in that matter and makes no findings
as to the merits of the request.
16. That the proper 1 egal requi rements for adverti si ng of the
heari ng before the Board of County Comni ssi oners of Spokane County have been
met. 17. That on the llth day of J une, 1985, the Board of County
Comnissioners of Spokane County at a regular meeting did APPROVE in part and
OENY in part the proposal subject to certain conditions.
DECISION
From the foregoing Findings, a review of the Planning Department
Staff Report dated March 7, 1985, and the Staff presentation of File No.
ZE-130-84, the Board hereby in APPROVING in part and DENYING in part, the
proposal does make the following conditions:
CONDITIONS
l. That the conditions set forth in the Spokane County Zoning
Hearing Examiner staff analysis dated March 14, 1985, on pages 1 through 12,
are hereby adopted as conditions of approval subject to the following
amendments:
2. That the proposal is approved for a 40-Unit Apartment Complex.
3. 7hat the Apartment Complex shall be connected to the County's
sewerage system and shall not be allowed on-site sewage disposal. . 4. That the area desi gnated as an on-si te drainfiel d for the
project as ori gi nal 1y desi gned may be used for the addi ti onal 5-Uni ts as
approved i n the Deci si on. .
5. The height of the structures shall be limited as follows:
Two Stories along the East portion of the site.
Three stor.i es al ong 'the No rth porti on of the si te.
One story along the west portion of the site.
6. That the developer shall be responsible for paving and curbing
Fancher Road to include sidewalks along the east side of Fancher Road as well
as participating on a pro-rata basis for the paving and curbing of Woodlawn.
. '
DATED Thi 5 6ti ~ day of 198LA:~:
~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
l
r
ATTEST:
WILLIAM E. DONAHUE
C1 erk of the Bo rd
By : Deputy
. 53 - 2y
F; ;AD RAMCE t?: id0 .~Anfch cP P;{' ij,-90S
86o3u4oz35 ~
~ lJ i y r- }z: , . LL/-32
N ~rc.~ L , . ~
o. 6
- NOTIC:E TO THE Pt1BLIC 'IsR ~o~
f FF. 8 pAGE
VQI.
.KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That Gordon R. Finch and Marla J. Finch w being'the owners of the followinq described lands in consideration of mutual benefits
to be hereafter derived do for themselves, their heirs, arantees and assiqns, hereby .
agree to the following: .
Join and participate in the formation of a County Road Imorovement Dis-
trict (RID) pursuant to RCW 36.88, at such time as a district may be
formed or any Road Improvement Project sanctioned by Spokane County, which
involves the lands herein described. The owners, their heirs, and assiqns
further aqree not to oppose or protest any legal_assessments for said Road
•?mprovement District (RID) established pursuant to RCW 35.88.
It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or anv Road
Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the imarovements
required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existinq pave-
ment) will be at the sole expense of the undersiqned owner, their heirs,
grantees and assigns,as established by Zone Change 130-84.
These conditions and statements apply to the followinq described property:
(This Notice pertains to RID 438, Woodlawn Drive #259-"0" and Fancher Road #205)
Lots 8,9,10,11 & 12, including 30 foot vacated strip lying North of and adjacent
to said Lots 8 thru 12 inclusive and LGtS 13,14,15,16 & 17 including 30 foot
vacated strip lying South of and adjacent to said Lots 13 thru 17 inclusive and
including 30 foot vacated strip lying West of and adjacent to Lots 12 & 13;
EXCEPT the South 256.75 feet of said strip in Block 6, CENTRAL PARK ADDITION, as
recorded in Volume "C" of Plats, Page 14, in Spokane County, Washington. In
Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 43 E.W.M.
„4 «
These requirements are and shall run with the land and shall be bindina u the
owners, their heirs, successors or assigns. .
Dated T` - ~ f n X' ` ~
~ ~ - Gordo . i n c
x
Marla ~J . Finch
J
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
,
On thi s,
2Y day , , 19~, before me personal ly appeared
Gordon R. Finch and'M"arla J. Finch
kr,owr, tc me tc thz the :nd -I vi dua? (s ) whc executeu t{•tc foi-cgui nci itistrument and
acknowledqed the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
individual(s), for the uses and purposes herein mentioned.
IN WITNESS WHEREGF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
~~Q~~r~Ob `},t ✓r' .~~,w►+„'"' • ~TO J ~P .
eV l
County Engineer Notary Publ i c, IR: d', ,dtE
r, t S' ~ 1 'li '
of Washinqton, r ~ ~ ~°r~~
~ Washi n9 ton. ~.v►~
407 6b ~~0
t~
;s ~~~.i:'•• + .
oo~+aNUE . .
w~~~~ Auoiloa .
{SpOXANE CPU7YY. WASN.'R/W 1/1/85 oE
ti 4, ti
Req Court House xxx
- ~
(.c100dIL^WAd D~2 ~l 2,S9 "Q" .
~ FORD NiHkSE en NO ~FlAIcA 6e. 1~4 id2oS
r . s6o3u4o0"V3s ~
RPFiCEL 40. L~~3Z - Z 2 O~
No. 6 .
3~
NOTI(;E TO THE PLIBLIC FF~osE ~o ~ 13~
VQI. 8
11~~ PAGE
.KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That Gordon R. Finch and Marla J. Finch being"the owners of the followinq described lands in consideration of mutual benefits
to be hereafter derived do for themselves, their heirs, arantees and assiqns, hereby .
agree to the following:
Join and participate in the formation of a County Road Imnrovement Dis- .
trict (RID) pursuant to RCW 36.88, at such time as a district may be
formed or any Road Improvement Project sanctioned by Spokane County, which
involves the lands herein described. The owners, their heirs, and assiqns
further aqree not to oppose or protest any legal__assessments for said Road
Improvement District (RID) established pursuant to RCW 35.88.
It is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or anv Road
Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the imorovements
required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pave-
ment) will be at the sole expense of the undersiqned owner, their heirs,
grantees and assigns,as established by Zone Change 130-84.
These conditions and statements apply to the followinq described property:
(This Notice pertains to RID 438, Woodlawn Drive #259-"0" and Fancher Road #205)
Lots 8,9,10,11 & 12, including 30 foot vacated strip 1}-ing Narth of and adjacent
to said Lots 8 thru 12 inclusive and LGtS 13,14,15,16 & 17 including 30 foot
vacated strip lying South of and adjacent to said Lots 13 thru 17 inclusive and
including 30 foot vacated strip lying West of and adjacent to Lots 12 & 13;
EXCEPT the South 256.75 feet of said strip in Block 6, CENTRAL PARK ADDITION, as
recorded in Volume "C" of Plats, Page 14, in Spokane County, Washington. In
Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 43 E.W.M.
These requirements are and shall run with the land and shall be bindina u the
owners, their heirs, successors or assigns. .
.
Dated X;~
< ~ - Gordo R. inc.
x
Marla Finch
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
,
On thi sly&- day of , c , 19~, before me personal 1y appeared
Gordon R. Finch and1M"arla J. Finch
kr,own tc me to thz the -nd', vi dUal (s ; whc executcd i,i~~E furegui ny ~ iistrument arid
acknowledqed the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
individual(s), for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the
day and year first above written.
'.~il;,-u;.i
. ,4r
~ ♦ ~,q a e 0 i Qp` 'r~/
' W • 7
EG: U R;
~
~ate
County Engineer Notary Publ ic, Iri: a
_ . ,..'~,A
~ F ~ o f Wa s h i nqto n , re§i
. ' ~ Washi ngton. ~.~v►
4 0? ~
~ .~y •~~~~IOI~ ~
A ~,F;:J't•I
rY«LrnH E. ooNaHUE
AUOtTOa ,SPOKANE C4u?YY. WdSH,l
R/W 1/1/85 oEp
i~" yowr'4c~
Req Court House xxx
- " • . Ga ry Kenna 1 y
Engineer's Office
► INTEROFFICE MAIL
~ PLANNING DEPARtMEIVT
BROAOWAI' CENTqE 9UILDiNG N 721 1EFFERSON STREET
:r.'Ir y T .
aH0NE 456-2205
x '
.111 ~'t 7
1 _ SPOKANE WASNINGTON 9926C
-SrOwAM[ (~1,~C.'JwtiDU4C
RECEIvED
March 15, 1985
MAR 20 1985
SPOKAr►r rn, JrITV F►~GiNEER
T0: Board of Spokane County Comissioners
FROM. Steve P. Horobiowski, Zoning Administrator I
SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Corrmittee Ac-tions of March 7, 1985. '
Gentlemen:
On March 7, 1985, the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee met at 9:00 A.M., to
consider four new ione reclassification applications and one change of conditions
application. One additional change of c rnditions application was withdrawn by
the applicant. Members present: Mrs. Myers,.Chairperson, Mrs. Tennican and
Mr. Skalstad.
Following are the applications in seq uence and the action taken by the Committee. If not appealed, these decisions will become final on March 25, 1985. All Find-
ings and Order for this hearing were signed on March 14, 1985.
1) ZE-5913-81, Chanqe of Conditions in the Freeway Commercial Zone
and
VE-205-84, Variance from the Setback Requirements of the Freeway Commercial
Zone: Gunnin4
Location: Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue, approximately
150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal: Addition of 14-Units to an existing Motel
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
The Zoning Adjustor also approved the requested Variance to
allow a 32-foot from Cataldo Avenue, whereas Section
4.08A.050-(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires
a 50-foot setback.
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban
and
• VE- 1-85, Variance from the Frontage Requirement of the Multiple Family
Suburban Zone: Finch
Location: Generally located northeast of the intersection of Woodlawn Dr.
and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43.
Proposal: 40-Unit Apartment Complex
r1ct-3i;. Approval for a 35-Uni t Apartment Complex. (Vote: 3- 0)
(continued)
• " ~
Zoning Hearing Examiner Cormiittee Actions of March 7, 1985 (continued)
2) ZE-130-84, Agricultural to Multiple Famil~ Suburban and VE-1-85, Variance
Request from the Frontage Requirement (continued)
The Hearing Examiner Committee was concerned with the
proposed dens i ty of the pro,ject and i ts compati bi 1 i ty wi th
the existing multi-family developments in the immediate area.
The Zoning Adjustor approved the requested Yari.ance to allow
an apartment complex on a lot with 30-feet of pu6lic road
frontage, whereas Section 4,07,060 of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requires 90-feet of frontage. (note: The
applicant has additional frontage through a private easement.)
3) ZW-1326-78, Chanqe of Conditions in the MininQ Zone; Central Pre-Mix Concrete
Location: Generally located south of and adjacent to Fort Wright Road,
and approximately 1,600 feet easterly of the intersection of
- Fort Wright Road and Government Way in Section 11-25-42.
Action: Withdrawal Accepted. CVote: 2- 0)
The application was withdrawn by the applicant by a letter
dated February 14, 1985,
4) ZE-106-84, Agricultural Suburban to Commercial: East Bannen Properties Location: Generally located at the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue
and Bannen Road in Section 14-25-44.
Proposal: Retail Building
Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0)
5) ZE-120-84, Agricultural to Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban:
~yatt
Location: Generally located east of and ad,jacent to the intersection of
Buckeye Avenue and Pines Road in Section 10-25-44.
Proposal: 270-Unit Multi-Family Complex
Action: Approval for the Multiple Family Suburban Zone at a density
of 9 dwelling units per acre (Site Size - Approximately 14.54
Acres). The Residential Office Zone request was denied.
(Yote: 3 - 0)
The Hearing Examiner Committee felt that the proposal was too
dense for the advertised property north of the Freeway, con-
sidering the impacts to the Aquifer and the uncertainty as to
timing of availability of sewers in the area; therefore, it
was felt that the dwelling units allowed should be reduced in
number. The Residential Office Zone request was denied as
future use for offices does not appear practical at this time
until an areawide sewer would be more readily available.
- 2 - (continued)
i
8POKANE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
. I
OATE: ~2 ? / aI , ,
T0: p ASSE530 R
O AUDITOA
O BUILDINCI CODE8 b SAFETY
O BUILDINO MAINTENANCE
O CLERK
0 COMMUNITY SERYICE8
O ISTRICT COURT NQINEERS '
•O HEALTN OISTRICT
0 JUVENILE COURT
O PAAK & RECREATION
O PEASONNEL
O PLANNING
O PRINT SHOP
O PROSECUTOR
O PU9lIC DEFENDER
O PURCHASINQ
0 SHERIFF
0 STATE EXAMINER
0 SUPERIOR COURT
O SYSTEMS 3ERVICES
❑ TREASUAER
O UTII.tTIES
O OTHER
0 9-1-1
FO YOUR:
,qlNFORMATION
O ACTfON
O REPLY TO:
❑ SUPPLY VEABAL
INfORMATION TO dOARD.
ArrtAL . ,
i 0 THE BOARD OF ('OIINTY COt4-IISSInNi:h
. • • Appeal Fee - $ 75. 00 z
~
Name: Kris A. KirFiease trick Today's Date 3/21/85
f~r nt) Address: East 5803 Woodlawn Drive Zip Code: 99212
Home Phone: (509) 534-5656 Business Phone: (509) 325-5576
Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed
Title: Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban
Preliminary Subdivieion Number:
Zone Reclassification Number: ZE-130.-84 Hearing - ~arch 7, 1985 Date of Hearing Examiner CocRnittee Ac on: Findin~Ord - March 14, 1985
Signature: Bv:
Signature of Authorized Representative: William A. T ari, Jr.
His attorney
Address: 1010 Paulsen Building - Spokane, Washin ton 99201
Telephone : (509~ 455-8890
YOUR REASOtIS FOR APPEAL including, but not limited to,
that the Dr~op osed use is contrary to the Comprehensive Plan of Spokane Countv;
that there -~ias been an insuflicient assessment of the proposal's adverse im-
pacts to the physical environment and to the public health, safetY and welfare;
that the provisions ot the Washington State Environmental Policy Act have not
been com lied with and there was no basis for making a threshold determination
ot non-s~gniticance; that the proposed use will be unduly detrimental to single
familY dwelling uses to the west and/or that appropriate conditions and per-
iormance standards were not imposed in the re-zone so as to protect these
properties from incompatible and adverse iNe act• that the findin s are not .
supportec~by ev~dence in t~ie record; that findlngs are insuicient as a
matter of law to support the decision; and that the decision is clearlv
erroneous and arbitrary and capricious.
~
11'e7 Or`
~
OFFICE USE ONLY
Copies to: Planning Engineers -2 Environmental Health /
Fee Received: Check Cash Receipt Number 47
,
,
Nearing Date :
I
. - - ' ~
• . Y i ~ .
•j-~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 'o ~ E ' 1a. ~ •
I4 r„~ 13
z o P ~ a
l j~
\
S ~ ~LM
•l 11.J♦
Q . x ~~ii.i.i~i►
v ~
I, e o i • •EY *Pw A •~i_.~. • ~ ~
- - . ~r i
.
~ ~ . . . . _ _ ~ . ~ ~
_ w w E e 1f T. A~I V L P,~c. R. R.
~
' 1r1. RIVEkSiDE
~ •
o. W. R a ni ril . Q a1 - - - . ~ - - - - _ . - _
P R .o► G V E
~ . . • . • ' . . .
T 5 ~ • ; 1 . ~ lar ~ ~t A ~
ZE~130m84
40 r-j tl ri- . E • •
LI V -g T1N A ' 8 51e. mltKi-
z
T
,
,
ro r N
v cr
z
7 . ~ T TM
N
E
8 t WoodAv•'
~ 23 . 4
r►• ' ' y ~ ~ ' ~tLZ
. . . ~ ~
~ IO♦N YIQ~T M
CIO- . ~
Z j IITN ~
12TM Or
E i2T)l ~ .
~ 3 rH i T ~
Z
~ V
4TH ~ 4 Th
TM < s., Z , r.~
r
~ J ~
ll;-z TH !sr►.~4 TH ~
Q • ~ V ~ t ~c ~
~6T►♦ ~ ~ E ~ T
~.-•~.y~ Z L ~ ~ .
AVE
f ~ , •
, z
7:1000
\ I
~ ~
l
r ~
R
FANCNt
'r- Q \ ~ s - ► i
~ • i • ~F
/
o • , ~
~
~ ,
~ I ` , • r~ r,
J R
~1 I
r ~ ! ` ~•~r ..,~j, . . L ~ ' ' . x•, i ` ,
. , .
~Z ► ~~r^,~~ r i~` a' I
~ ' r ~ „J~ 1 ~ 't ~
, ~ .
i
~ , • ' t ' i , •,,r1.~°'1 ~ „ 1
•1 ~ 't~.
.~~i ~ ro
`.M T ♦ J• ' ~ ~ ` I
. ~•f`1 . ~ ` ~ , I` a
~ ~ } v ~«r'~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ • '
`y~, / . !
+ ~~r ,r • ~ ~ ~ I ~ t ~ ~
S
1
f
~r
•
. J
~ , ~
. ~ ~
:
STAFF REPORT
UF►TE: MHItCH 79 1985
T0: hEARIN6 E.XAMINEft CO(hMI7TEE FROM: PLANN ING DEPAKTr1ENT STAFF
• SUBJ ECT : ZONE RECLASS YF ICAT ION NUMBEft : ZE-130-84
VARIANCE REQUEST NUM6ER: VE- 1-85
I. GENERAL INFURMATION
APPLICANT: GORDON FINCH -
PROPERTY OwNER: harry and Beaulah Stockman
REQUESTEU ZONING: hIULTIPLE FAP9ILY SUBURBAN
EXISTING ZUNING: Agricultural (established in 1953)
(with Airport Overlay - Yes)
(with ASA Overlay Zone -Yes -
ftEQUESTED VARIANCE: To allow an Apartment Complex on a lot with
30-feet of public road frontage, whereas
Section 4.07.06U of the Spokane County
Zoning Ordinance requires 9U-feet of
f rontage.
note: The applicant has additional frontage
through a private easement.
PItOPOSEU USE : 40-Uni t Apartment Compl ex = 2~0 --~7 v~w.;
EX IS7IN6 USE : Si ngl e Fami 1y Resi denti al
SITE SIZE: 1.92 Acres
CUN1PREhENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: URBAN .
PRIORITY StWER SEkVICE akEN: Yes AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA: Yes
PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located northeast of the intersection
of Woodlawn Ur. and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43.
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
1) COMPREhENSIVE PLAN: The Urban category of the Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan recommends a residential density of 1 to 17 units
per acre. The submi tted proj ect i s for a densi ty of 20 uni ts per
~ acre which is consistent with the Multiple Family Suburban Zone. The
Comprehensive Plan Text Decision Guidelines suggest that hlultiple
Family Suburban projects be located with near direct access to a
major arterial, near public transit routes, improve or maintain the
character of an area, and serve as a transitional use located between
single family residential and the more intensive uses. The project
can also be considered as being a fill-in-development. The Text
further suggests that many uses may require screening or other
performance standards to make them compatible with one another.
2) ZONING: North Plul ti pl e Fami 1y Suburban, Estaba 1971
East Multiple Family Suburban, Estab. 1971
West Agricultural Suburban, Established, 1957
. South 14ultiple Family Suburban, Estab, 1971
3) hISTURY OF LAND USE ACTIONS: The more recent zone changes in the
area have been to Residential hlanufactured home in 1974 and Multiple
Family Suburban in 1971 for the Central Park condominium
development. The Planning Commission in approving the Central Park
Condo proj ect for 272 units, they limited the structure height to one
story along 8th Avenue, Eastern and Fancher Roads. The interior
uni ts coul d be 2 stori es, wi th the uni ts al ong the north boundary
limited to 3 stories. Sight screening and landscaping around parking
lots were required, and vacation or new dedications were also
required with controlled access points to County Roads.
The Planning Commission found the proj ect to be in reasonable
proximity to shopping and other community services, that tne property
was on the edge of a residential neighbohood and that the proposal,
subject to required conditions, provided the best alternative for
residential development. The Planning Commission felt that the area
woul d not be readi ly devel oped for qual i ty si ngl e fami 1y resi dences,
and felt that the site, if developed in mobile homes, would have a
greater impact on the surrounding properties. The Planning
Gommission further required the Central Park development to connect
to City sewers which has been completed.
. ~ -
' ~ .
ZONE RECLASS'IFICATION NO'. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
II. BACKGROUND ANALYSIS (continued)
4) LANU USE: Site _ Single Family kesidential and
Outbuildings North Vacant .
East Central Park Condominium
South Central Park Condominium
West Single Family Residential
5) NEIGh80RH0UD' CONSIDERATIONS: Existing development along the.west
side of Fancher is single family residential; along the east si-de of
Fancher, development has been limited to one-story apartment
- complexes with a density of 12.8.units per acre. Access to the
proposed si te i-s -vi a Fancher, approxi mately 325 feet north of 8th,
Avenue, whi ch may, affect three (3) si ngl e fami 1y resi'dences. A
manufactured home zone exists approximately 200 feet to-the north of
this site. The SEPA Checklist submitted with this application
identifies 160 vehicl,e trips per day average.
I I I. S-ITE ANALYS IS
1) SITE CNARACTERISTICS ANO CONSIDERATIONS: The subject site is
bordered on three sides by Multiple Family Suburban zoning. This
rezone application will complete the development potential. Access
to the si te i s vi a 8th, north al ong-Fancher to a 30-foot access by
ownershtp and 30-foot access by easement. The Spokane County2oniing Ordi nance requi*res 9U--feet of conti nui ng frontage on -a County
maintained pub1ic street. The southern portion is flat with slopes
down to the north of approximately 20
2) AGft ICULTURAL SUf4MARY : The Urban category of the Comprehensi ve Pl an
i;s not i ntended to preserve or protect agri cul tural 1 and.
3) S ITE PLAN I NFURMAT IOiJ :
SITE SIZE: Approximately 1.92 Ncres
EXISTING BU ILU INGS: Si ngl e Fami 1y ltesi denti al and
Uutbuildings
, •
a
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
UARIANCE N0. VE- 1-$5
I I I. 5 ITE -ANALYS IS ( conti nued )
3) SITE PLAN INFURh1ATION (continued)
PROPOSED BUILDINGS: One 4-Unit and Two 18-Unit Bui'ldings
Site Coverage: 16 % for Buildings .
34 % for Parki ng, Si dewal ks and P'ati os
Pr.oposed Structure height: 2-1/2 Stories or 30-Feet -
PARKIN6 REQUIRED: 60 Spaces
PARKING PROVIDED: 60 Spaces
BUFFERING'TEChNIQUES: An existing fence is located along the west
property line but is not sight-obscuring; mature trees are scattered
on the property which should rema3n as much as possible: The site
pl,an i ndi cates a 15-foot 1 andscape stri p al ong the west property
line. Staff recommends dense landscaping, to be sight-obscuring with
- tal 1 growi ng t'rees, and a 6-foot wooden ,fence be provi ded; al so,
relocate the two parking spaces proposed there. The site plan shows
general landscape treatments on all areas not occupied by access
aisles, parking or buildings.
OThER SITE PL-AN CONSIDERATIONS: The site plan locates the buildings
near the north and east p.roperty 1 i nes which should provi,de
protection to the residences adjacent to the west. A portion of the
easement i s. uti lli zed by an access dri veway to the si te. The Staff
cannot address the issue of usability of this easement for forty
apartment dwellers or the extent of pading,:landscaping or other uses that may occur wi,thin the easement area. These issues are left to be
resolved between the affected parties,. Should the easement not be
utilized for the above purposes, it appears a redesign of the
dri veway can be accompl i shed wi thi n the 30-foot ownershi p of the
applicant. The Countjr Engineer has required road improvements along
Fancher to Eighth Avenue.
IV. CUNCLUSION: The project can be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
Uecision Guidelines for high density development, if compliance with the
recommended conditions is provided. The rezone to Multiple Family
Suburban is consistent with past ione changes in the area, although more
dense; and Fancher Road bei ng a publ i c street, has 'been condi ti oned by the.
County Engineer to accommodate the project traffic volumes. The Hearing
Examiner Committee may require additional conditions as deemed necessary
as a result of testimony received at the public hearing.
y~
. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
V. REC0MMENDEU AGENCY CONDITIONS, IF APPROVED:
(A11 Conditions imposed by the Zoning kearing Examiner Committee shall be
binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner o r.owners
of-the property, heirs, assigns, and successorso)
a) COUNTY PLANNINb DEPARTMENT
l. That:a 15-foot dense landscaped strip and a 6-foot wooden
si ght--obscuri ng fence be provi-d"ed al ong the west property 1 i ne.
Within the landscape strip, 12 - 15-foot trees planted 25-feet
apart shall also be provided,.
2. The Zoni ng Admi ni strator shal l, approve a speci fi c exteri or
lighting plan for the approved area pri.or to installation of
such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination
to the area wi th ful 1 consi deration to adj acent properti es
30 .A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for
maintenance accep,table to the Spokane County Zoning
Admi ni strator shal 1 be submitted wi th a performance bo-nd -for the
proj ect pr-i or to rel e-ase of bui 1 di ng permi ts. Landscapi ng shal 1
be i nstal led and mai ntai ned such that si ght di stance at access
potnts i s not obscured or impai red.
4. The appl i cant shal l devel op subject property general ly i n
accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner
Commi ttee. Vari ati ons when approved by the Zoni ng Admi ni strato'r
will be permi'tted, including,, but not limited to the following
ciianges :Bui 1 di ng 1 ocati on., 1 andscape pl ans, and general
allowabie uses of the permitted zone. Al1 variations must
conform to regul.ations set forth i n the Spokane County Zo,ni ng
Urdinance. The original intent of the development plans shall
be mai ntai ned. 5. The specific devel'opment plan will be submitted for Planniny
D'epartment revi ew and approval pri or to i ssuance of bui 1 di ng
permi ts.
6. Al1 current standards of the Multiple Family Suburban Zone, as
amended, shal,.l be complied wi,th in the development of this
si te.
.
ZONE RECLASS IF ICA7IUN 'NU. ZE-130-84
YARIANCE N0. VE- 1-85
a) CUUniTY PLANNING UEPARTMENT (continued)
7. That the project i s subject to 'Secti on 4.16A.050, the Aqui fer
Sensitive Area Overlay Zone of the Spokane County Zoning
Ordinance, which,sets forth various measures fo,r Aquifer
protection; specifically, measures dealing with wastewater
disposal, spill protection measures, and stormwater runoff.
8. Applicant shall comply with''208` recommendations concerning
stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff.
y.. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer,
shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting
Urdinances prior to issuance of building permits.
1 U. That the provi stons of SEPA's IdOTICE UF AC7IOI4 pursuant to
Chapter 43.21C.UBU RCW and the board of Spokane County
Commissioners kesolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project
appl i cant withi n thi rty ( 30_) days of fi nal di sposi ti on of thi s
application, and prior to any on-site improvements.
11. Pur-suant to the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCw, the SENA
tiui del i nes (WAC 197-1 U) and the Spobcane County E.nvi ronmental
Urdinance (SCEU), a proposed declaration of non-significance has
been issued at least fifteen (15) days prior to thi's date; the
official file,, written comments and/or public testimony contain
info'rmation regarding assessment of the proposal's likely
significant adverse impacts to the phy sical environment; a
finding is hereby made that no probable significant adverse
impacts upon the physical environ ment are anticipated as a
result of the project; and a final declaration of
non-significance is hereby to be issued.
' 1 z• tA l r-~c- ~e t rt t --j-a MW~ % J, &F# : T ?rn- ~1e+~rj
b) CUUNTY ENGrNEER ING DEPART14ENT
Prior To The Issuance Uf A Building Permit:
1. Access permi ts f.or approaches to the County Road System shal 1 be
obtai ned from the Spokane County Engi neer.
2. Hpplicant shall improve Fancher Road in a manner consistent with
Spokane County,TYPICAL roadway secti-on No. 1 mi nimum pavi ng width Access Sta,ndard.
3. Ito'adway improvements along Fancher shall be constructed from the
proposed dri veway approach ( Pri vate Uri ve access to Fancher) to Ei ghth Avenue.
.
. .
ZUNE ItECLASS IF ICAT ION N0. -ZE-130-84
dNkIAtdCE IdO. UE- 1-85
b) CUUNTY ENGINLERING UtPARTMENT (conti nued)
4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County
tngi'neer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance
of a building permit on the prope'rty. 5.. The applica.nt shail submit for approval by the Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County health District a detailed
combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal
pl an for the enti re. proj ec't pri or to the i ssuance of any
bui l di ng permi t on the property.
6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted
and approved by the Spokane County, Engi neer pri or to the
issuance of a building permit on the property. The design,
location, and arrangement of parking stalls.shal.l be in
accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving
or surfaci ng as approved by the County Engi neer, wi 11 be
requi red for any porti on of the proj ect whi ch i s to be occupi ed
or traveled by vehicles:
7. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of -the
property, hi s hei rs, assi gns; and successors.
8. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be
accompl i shed as approved.by the Spokane County Engi neer.
y. N11 required improvements shall conform to the current State of
Washington Standard Specifications for Koad and Bridge
Construction, and othe.r applicable County standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to koad Standards and Stormwater
Management in effect at the date of construction, unless
otherwi se approved by the County Engi neer,.
lU. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan
requi rements. are -found i n Spokane Board of County Commi ssi oners'
Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicabie to this
proposal.
11. Thi s pl at or devel opment pr, oposal i s 1 ocated wi thi n a drai nage
basi n whi ch ✓has been i.denti fi ed by t'he Spokane County Engi neer's
U,ffi ce as havi ng stormwater runoff probl ems. Si nce thi s pl at or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to'.
stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the
planning and i-mplementation of a future basinwide stormwater
management system. The fol 1'owi ng "Condi ti-on of Approval " shal 1
be requi'red: That the owner(s) or successor(s) i n i nterest
agree to joi n i n any County approved Storniwater Management
Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed
through public hearings-for service or benefit obtained by the
_ pl anni ng, . desi gn, constructi ng, maintai ni ng, or operati on of
stormwater control facilities.
,
• ' .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIUN N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE NU. ZE- 1-85
c) CUUNTY UT IL IT IES DEPA1tTMENT
l. Pursuant to B'oard of County Commissioners Resolution No.
80=U416, the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby
authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliance
with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Kealth
Uistrict and is further conaitioned and subject to specific
appl-ication approval and issuance of permits by the Health
Uistrict. -
2. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the
Gounty to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of
a ULID-by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the
petition includes the Uwner(s) property and further not to
object by the signing of a protest petition against the
formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter
36.94 which includes the Uwner(s)* property. PROVIUED, this
condi ti on shal l not.prohi bi t the Owner(s) or Successor( s) from
obj ecti on to any assessment(s) on the property as a resul t of
i rnprovements cal l ed for i n conj uncti on wi th the formati on of a
ULIU by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter
36.94.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in
accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane
County, as amended.
4. Each unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future
areawide collection systems.
5. Plans and specifications for the double plumbing are to be
reviewed and approved by the Utilities Uepartment.
d ) CUUNTY HtALTh O-ISTR-ICT l. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall
- be approved by the County Engi neer and the keal th Ui stri ct pri or
to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permi t for thi s proj ect.
2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
3. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits
by the Nealth Officer, the use of an on-site se,wage disposal
system may be authorized.
. 40
.
. ,
ZUNE ftECIASS IF ICNTION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE NU. VE- 1-85
d) CUUNTY hEALTN D:ISTR ICT ( conti nued )
4. Water servi ce shal 1 be coordi nated ttirough the Ui rector -of
Utilities, Spokane County, 5. Water servi ce -shal 1 be by an exi sti ng publ i c water supply when
approved by the Regional Engi°neer (Spokane), State Department of
Social and Health Services.
b. Use of pridate wells and water systems is prohibi-ted.
7. Ui sposal of sewage'effl uent beneath'paved surfaces i s currently
_ prohibited.
e) GUUNTY BUILUING AND SAFETY UEPARTMENT
l.. The site is located in Fire Uistrict # 1.
2. Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be
i nstal 1 ed pri or to any constructi on. These hydrants. shal 1 be
pl aced so that no porti on of the~ bui 1 di ng exteri or A s more than
175 feet from -the 'hydr.,ant. The bottom of the 1 owest outl et of
the hydrant shall ue no less than 18 inches above grade. A
water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per
mi nute for each -fi re hydrant) and meeti ng the requi rements i n
Chapter 10. 04 of the Uni form Fi re, Code i s requi red. pri or to
construction of the water servi ce. Al'1 required fire protection
facil'ities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and
du ring the time of construction.
3. Where it is desired to have access cont"rol gates in residential
developments, the following shall apply:
'The minimum width of roadway, inside of access gate; shall be
twel ve (12') feet. There shal 1 be at 1 east two -(2) such dri ve
approaches where the gates are located. One may be used for
vehicles exiting. Tire flatting spiices shall nat be used unless
the entrance is'a minimum of twenty (2U) feet wide. 7he gates
shall be provided with an appoved method of emergency ope'ratton
i n accord'ance,wi th the fi re department standards. -Where each
drive approach is less tha'n twenty (20) feet in width and
controll'ed by gates, a secondary means of access shall be
provided with a clear, twenty (20) foot unobstructed opening.
' ~I
f . .
1
i . • .
ZONE RECLASS IFICNT ION '-N0. ZE-130-84
VARIANCE M.- VE- 1-85
e) CUUNTY BU ILn ING ANU SAFETY DEPNKTh1ENT ( conti nued ) 4. Each structure shall be accessibl.e to Fire Department apparatus
by way of access roadways wi th al 1-weather dri vi ng surface
capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. The
minimum paved roadway width, inside curb face to inside curb
ftce, shall be twenty-four (24) feet with no parking. Parallel
parking is p.ermitted on one side with road widths a minimum of
. thirty (30) feet. Parallel parkIng is permitted on both sides
wi th road -wi_dths a m-i, ni mum of thi rty-si x(36) feet. Si.gns
noti ng such i s'requi red for fi re 1 ane. The turni ng radi us of
private roadways and drive aisles shall b.e a minimum of twenty
(20) feet i nsi de and a mi ni mum of forty-fi ve (45) feet outsi.de
to.the curb face. Cul de sacs more than six hundred (bUU) feet
from., the center 1 i ne of the nearest cross street shall have a
:minimum radius of thirty-seven (37) feet, six (b) inches (75
feet diameter).
5: Approved num6ers or addresses shall be-placed on all new and
ezisting'buildings in such a positio,n as to be plainly visible
and legible from the street or road fronting the prope"rty. Said
numbers shall contrast with their background.
6. Trash enclosures shall not,be located adjacent to combustible
construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves.
7. A land use permit will be required for each structure.
• f') WATER PURVEYOR
1.. Water Purveyor is Spokane Suburban Water Compary, and they will
supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire.and '
irrigation uses; however, satisfactory arrangements to serve
this proposal have not been made. -
-
. . `
ZUNE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-130-84
VARIAtdCE N0. VE- 1-$5
g) CUUnITY AIR PULLUTION COIdTROL AUThOkIT-Y
l. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during
demoli ti on, excavati on and constructi on proj ects be control 1 ed.
This ma~y require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers,,or
suspensi on of acti vi ty duri ng certai n weather cond'i,ti ons.. haul
roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of
earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions froin
all other construction related activi-ties. .
2. t+leasures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud
from unpaved surfaces onto pave'd surfaces. If tracki ng or
spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken
immediately to clean these surfaces.
3. All-travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access
. roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. It has been determi ne'd that fi repl aces and wood stoves are a
significant source of suspended particulates. The smal.l
particles ([,1Onicrons) are respirable and can have an adverse
effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if
wood stoves/fireplaces are used, that burning be done as
efficiently as possible. All wood should be seasoned and stored
in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated
,air pollution levels, we request that use of wood stoves and
fireplaces be discontinued.
5. Some objecti onabl e odors wi 11 1 i kely resul t duri ng the
constructi on phase of the proj ect and from motor vehi,cl es usi ng
the site following completio,n of the project and from occupants
of the proposed proj ect. •
6. All air pollution regul,ations must be met.
'7. Addi ti onal Comments : '
We request deni al of the proposed project unless Woodl awn Dri ve
from 8th Avenue to Fancher and Fancher from 8th Avenue to
Woodlawn Drive are paved.1
~ tvc, z p\~ =~,t. - ~J ! 0 ► y ~1 ~ - A2 ~.~C S s~a ~ ~ ~ ~ tu ; ! 1 b~
0! ~ ~
t1 k) C--R5 -i" S c ~ ~ _ ~ !'yS' i v ~.e, o~d /t~/~•~j . ~ ~ 5G3-.~ ~
e, b~~~~
~,1C~~ ~t 8 ~~~~t c~ ~~''o~~ V ~~~s'~t'~ret, i'~rrt~! •~M.~' ~C ~r~,.~ ~ ' -
C',,t'cc.~L~ l~8 R2a S- ~,('~c'~ ~ji'•r~ ~rG`~ P.~~ v~ ~ Ul'i'1 fdl ~ r5~ ~ f~1 Si - Sil t~~ ~~~s~~~/~~~I'~i
. .
/ .
,0 ~ ~"cofJ' . •
u,,
w ~
NA ...ca~0 o v-)-E--~Sv l~- U.n 1~ r~ • . ; ~ ~ ,.7 ~.L
~Q'Yi G ~ , P~~,/7.~~/•
tU c'J~J~ !3'
c UJ r~V, n)
tj'~.~1 v~ JL~` ✓
~`~1~j ♦~d
,{~.,i,_~G~ . ~,`1 •~.c• ~ ~ c~~ c~a; ~.t'~s~?~^~l ~ ~r° VJC'~~°~', 1 c.,~.v~,~ n . ~ ~
~ f
~ ~
5g l u,?Bd UJ ij 1) r- t} 1 ,
tf...Qi-r il.L,-1
7 ,
. U.% ~ fi~'-~~~ ~'C"~'+'.OU C~ •
~ • j ,~...:F~ , ' - ~ ~ j ~j ~ n c ~'~t',,.f.v~~ ~ ~Q~t~ i
1AN~ l.►.lL.~? U.,~L`-:.~~ ~~dtr~J.,.-~ . Ui
~ ~M/t~ v""b kU-k-~1-,Q Y-"'Yr .
rt'o'-;"
A U ~ 4.~f~~.~'r~ ~1~~ ~~C ~ i -4 ~ " ~Lfl.~
9 ,QsV-A_L1i'tj5t,' ~ ~ • ~,'~'Lt~./at"Z-~- ~(~,7Ya G~.)ev F') X~~-~~Yf .
7'Zenn •
~ • ~ G~
`~..-l%10L,26 ; ! - M ;~~~~i,1`•t i`~'~~ < G-~,,,i ~ '~i~b
~ • G~ 'riZ (a~~J Cr~ Z r7 ~'O ~ ~O :~..A w oJ ~1~Z. • -r ~ e~
4~' u~ , ~ r ~~n.t/~ ~.~.f~t1-~-~~.~`~~N~"2.JE~~f~• ~~./yt„~!r-~'1~?,
6 ~ 1I~: ~ SJ~v ~l 'j"i• ~ .l~O~ r t : 4.~n : d`- I `r ` " ~ ~r : r
i
- - ' 11 ~ T ~ - ~~j~ f ~,''t` 1=-r!~ r' V •
~ ' 'J° 'e-~ ~ ` ~ • r ~ •1l`,~ (f~A ~ ~ ,c~
,ni'nr1~~ , ~~t~` ~ ~ 1 •,1i` ♦ ~ 1Yt~ , ✓ ~
~ ~/u~l.~v~ ~'~--~~_~/vr✓~ ~
~~`~3~" ' f' ~~~-~'~',~C d~ ~0 ~g~- ~ l •
.
U.► +-4 ~
SUn PP-- ~ ~
~.~.~.~~v~ ~ G► ~vti,> • ~ . . S • `j~ii.~. t1.-~~ 1'' ~ t~
~ ~ ~i~, S•PJw ~t2. ~~.e~~ c~-o..r~.. ~ ~ -~i~v-2~
~ r ,~`J 1 1~
AGENDA, MARLh 1. 198, TkLEi•NONE NQ.: 456-2205
1 . .
SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Place: Broadway Centre Building, 5econd Floor
North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260
ZONING APPLICATIONS WILL BE NEaRO IN TNE FOLLOWING OROER. TNE ZONING NEARING EXAMINER
COMMITTEE WILL RECESS FROM 12:00 NOON TO 1: 30 P.M, FOR LUNCH AT A PtACE TO BE ANNOUNCED.
ITEMS NOT HEARO PRIOR TO THE 5:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT, WILL 6E CONTINUED TO THE NEXT AVAIL-
ABLE DATE AS ANNOUNCED BY THE CNAIRMAN OF THE ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE.
LE6AL DESCRIPTIONS AND PROJECT DETAILS FOR THESE PROJECTS ARE ON FILE AND AUAILABLE IN
THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE.
9:00 A.M.
ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
l, ZE-59B-81 CNANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THE FREEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONE
VE-205-84 VARIANCE FROM THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS OF THE FREEWAY
COMMERCIAL ZONE
(Generally located south of Cataldo Avenue, approximately
150 feet west of Sullivan Road in Section 14-25-44.)
Comprehensive Plan: Major Comnercial and Urban
Proposed Use: Addition of 14-Units to an
Existing Motel
Proposed Yariance: To aliow a 32-foot setback from
Cataldo Avenue, whereas Section 4.08A,050-(2) of the
Spokane County Zoning Ordinance requires a 50-foot
setback.
Site Size: Approximately 31,900 Square Feet
Applicant: TED GUNNING
cJo D. J. Hume
500 Columbia Building
Spokane, WA 99204
2. IE-130-84 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPIE FAMILY SUBURBAN
YE- 1-85 VARIANCE FROM THE FRONTAGE REQUIREMENT OF TNE MULTIPLE FAMILY
SUBUR6AN ZONE
(Generally located northeast of the intersection of Woodlawn Or.
and Fancher Road in Section 24-25-43.)
Comprehensive Plan: Urban
Proposed Use: 40-Unit Apartment Complex
Proposed Yariance: To allow an apartment complex on a
lot with 30-feet of public•road trontage, whereas
Section 4.07.060 of the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance
requires 90-feet of frontage. (note: The applicant
has additional frontage through a private easement.)
Site SiZe: Approximately 1.92 Acres
Applicant: GORDON FINCN
c/o Rose Company
East 9611 Sprague Avenue
Sppkdne, WA 99206
~ - _ - - - _ , } ~
• Q ~ • UE a'~'~ - ~ p
~ N ° - V' ~►O~
i ~ G~„"~~'•
~ 14 wn I ~
~ • ~ ~ '
A wu P ~ B,GOlt
a a~~ • Y ` + . .
~
~ L,-,~•^T•~ • • • , • • . - - ~
V . EY ~A ' .
_w ~ • - . ~ ~
• ~
P44~ -
_ w~ r e si r. Pw ti t, f P~ac. R., R.
.
~
i ~ b~ . ~IVt~SlCE ,
' o. W.Q s nf rV P a al o
- ~ • P R..o►~ u F.
~ ; ~ . . . , .
. • •
,l ~ _ - . , Isr ~ ~ d
T
Z'Em 1 3 u'm8 S, t-i„
9 J ,
~ - - ~ Z .
to jrj cm M
_ 9 , • I1H A
. ,
, -S9 67 1; 1 6 z T _
3 . Q, ~ ~ ~ ~'~c.~ .
, 4..
~ . Q
s~ .
r°' ~
7 TW
I E ~ ~ , • r~ ~%✓C~l~b~!
T ~
_ . .
23 .
r1~ _ . . y . . . _ , • . n ~ ~1 . .
W • • J ~
iOtN Q ~ J . g
, ~ _ k . . -Y IQAIL
Z J IIfM ~ '
127r, ~ I2TN- Or
1'3 rM
= r4 TM
rN o ~ ,4 a , 14T04
t . J
2 /3 T's• k~~ T~-- Q 1~ ~
~ TMI .s: ~ l
' T►♦ ~ ~ ~ ' 0
• . • - ~ - - --f .
Z : ~ = u • •
A%VMI
p.• z .~~r~: ~ . ~ ~ ` -
Q f ~ ' 10 0
~ z
~ w . - - - • 10-1000
~ ~J~° a~
:
= 1
SPOKANE C4UNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLIC,ATION FOR ZONE RECL.A.SSIFICATION
Application No:
Date: 1-7 - n;
Name of Ap'plicant: CA-Mao'N F1CJCFI/Ccyn,:.ar-~'_ ps':son: MAnY spRAc4,r,~,E-g00mE!
Street Address Of Applicant: 1710 rins,n ror.ipany. E.. 9611 5praque A%•Qn>>P.
Ci'ty: ~ppl:~n-~- State: !4a. Zip Code: 99206 Tele. No. 924-o840
Name of Property Owner(s): 11a-Y:, & Bi'-iluZah S-,~odkrnan
Authorized Agent represen'ting Owner
(if other than owner : rOItDON I'ING!I
.
Existing Zoning Classification : Ag
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 1955
Existi'ng USE Of Property: One sinale famil;+ ciuelling
Proposed Zone Classification : MFS
P roposed U se of P roperty : Aga'r tmPn ~ Cohpl Px
Cen i ral Park Add. Lots 8-thru 17 , B1 k. 6 includa.nq
Legal 'DescripLion of Property:_ap t vat. Qt,-;~ snf(i i r.or4 13 thru 17- and
34' vacen*_ strip N. or and adj. Lats 8 thru 12 and including vac. 30' s•trip W. or ani3
a44 gxnppt S 7~675 f t_ ,EASF:M~NT- RPgj nnin~ a f h_ So i hwest carner Qf Bl ock b of Centta 1
Pa•rk Addition; thence t•lest 30 feet; 1--hence North 40 'feet on a 1 ine parall.el with the West
l,inP nf Ale'nk Fi• tbp.UrA F.ast 30 Fpp-t e. hP Weat line Qf gloCk 6. tb_qjlc,-e Soutb 40 f eet On
the Yes t l,ine of Block 6`:o P.O. B.
Section: 24 Township: 25 Range: 43
Sour'Ce of Legal : First AmPrican Ti tle Co. 6 County Assessor
Assessor's Parcel iVo: (See tax statement) 24532-2204
Property Size: 250 x 330 Frontage: 70 Feet on: F'ancher'
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or spo,nsor: NnNE
Street Address of the Property: t:ast 59_12 sixtn Avenue
If you do not hold title to the property affecfed by this application, what is your
inCeresi in it? PURC:•rASER
Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
tJONF KN4blN
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANS,WERED:
I. What are the changed conditions of' the site ar.ea, which you feel make this
proposal warranted? p~~l 1~ i- r'-~rzt 1- lc,,i -1»n = in i ng nurroundc Lhp- iognr W_=
-jtrsL-a i',1Q1.T1tT 'rlt : 1, iZf?d ri`' apartr-irn*Cs ar)l' `rl(')d()fl:tll►.lf'1S.
c. W ha[ ef~fect ~~~ili the propo5eci zone reclassitication have on ltie adjacent
propertie5' , i~~•:;~_ in• r rmasr~ r,t fi~r, on t'anchet: . `n fJorL!y ,
c71 ,c A-,,nut3. .l 1 - r1 ; r1
Rev. 2/3; 81
Numbe r
S POK AN B COUNTY EA1G INBES
PBI:LIN INAxY CONSOLTATIOK
A. Proj ect Name : 6,,0 ireIo e•a ~in c. 14
PROPOSAL Number of Parcels : L~S3 Z. 2_ Z° ¢ -
Section ;7-4= T. ,7- 57 N., R. E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2<V4
DEYELOPER Name : /17~
or Add ress : GE~,,~ e n
AGENT Phone : Businfiss cj 2-a-^UG 4-o Home ~
Name: _
OWA1ER Address.: Phone: Bueiness Home
Name: .
BNGIAlBEB Add re s s: .
Phone: Busines'e flome
B. PRBLIMZNARY CONSIILTATIODi: Date : BY : _Je__v- o-c, 5 ~ c,-
~
Preliminary a) Right-of-Way
Conditions b) Curb . .
c) Sidewalk ,
d) Pave ,
e) Approaches , f) Drainage ,
g.) State/City Review Yes No C)
Remarks: NOTE: Ttiis proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulatione for Roade, Ap-proach. and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution
Ido. 80-1592 as amended. Conditions are preliauinary and may change after field in-
apection and review,of 'County re'corda.
C. INSPECTION Uate : BY : -
Remarke:
~
D. SIPECI.FIC CONDITIONS:
Fee Paid: Yes 'r No Amount aeh ~ Planning Appl ication Signed : Date 8Y : /eck
-
E. FINAL PIAT CHECKS
Fee Paid: Date Amount Check Cash
Mathematical & Surveying Checka:
No. 1 Date By No. 2 Date BY - No. 3 Date By
Additional mathematical and Surveying Checks:
.No. 4 Date By Fee Amt.bDt.Pd.
'No. 5 Date By Fee Amt.bOt-.Pd. _
N&. 6 Dat e By Fee Am t.. & Ot . Pd . ,
No. 7 Date C3y Fee Amt.bOt.Pd.
1/81
.
. 'a
il
~
~
• i
~.F~"i • ~ ° ~ ~ , . , ~ `
'4Z; ~ ~ ~ • ~ ,
R E C E 0 P T Da#e ~Q-r- -9 i9--SS' 3 22 7.i
-
r ~
'k4l ~1~~~ Received From (:7--> T.
-,,~'a~~ e~ ~ , • ~
Address
,
Dolla rs-,t.~ ~ . .
, •f '
For
O C • i
kCCOUNT H4WPAID f'~~~~
~ • „ . ~i
t~1~ ' ' ~ • AMT. Of . ~ ~ r'~A<F
ACCOt1NT , I ~ . , ttl.. 4 . ./Lr. ' ~ . -
nrNr.pai~. Cr+eoc lC6tf~, od5Ni6~::;.~Ji~ • .
WKfiRCF. , , ' ' ~ / ^ ~ ~V~ V ► - v ~ f ; ; Q~ ~ ' ' ' ~ - - . , ' . ' :
M i~ f ~
YyG
ett 08 CVwj@
3~~:d ~ . . . ' - , . - . .s .~v ~ „ ~ o. . - >..~.....o.._s~;,.../i.e .:.J2•Gy~~a--: ~.'~1i 1~o.r-~.~
• ' ~ .~.~.►K.-w rr •ca_, ~~~~r
r • ~ t ~e
~i4kJ►.!'ri_u~=jr.. ~v_..1eae~i_.. . a.e~t~..=~._...,sa,~ . ~ - m ~ f~ - l, ~:~5 ^~"r~~.
~:~t.~"'.~tl~oy• yw.u7.:,7~~,ar_' K`vfi :.~5,'l~,~w+'- '.ii~~~A-!,c.i+~ . Li i1t~,J
GORDON FINCH HOMES
i` SOUTH 4'323 EVERCREEN 928-5172 4600
~ VERADALE, WASHINGTON 99037
26-3/1251 y
i '
pa; tot he
i oder of I _ $
-le-, Qollars
~N=m Easf Btao &ancA i
GpdtLp~ta+alBorw SyoAo~so. Wos!►inpton 9S2W i
. ~ I
For ~
II°004600u° Ia b 2 5 b000 34,00 b 29,a,38 2,i,8"° 3 a
ww.a.o e's m a ~
~
1 '
. ,
g J .
A. VARIANCES
1. ln vi-ew of the-above information, what spe.cial ci rcumstances (beyond your
cont rnl o r acti ons ) dep ri ve you of the s ame gene ral ri ghts an d pri vi 1 eges
of -o t her p,roper ty owners wi t hin t he same zone and vi cini ty?
- .
.
. x' , .
--a~, Z• If the vari ance were granted, how woul d it affect nei ghbora ng properties
o r i mp rovemen ts ? ' .
,
B. CONDIQf~AL USES, ZERO LOl`LINE,_ NON-CONFORMING USE, TEMPORARY PERMITS, ETC.
' S
F~j~
17f
1. Pleas give a concise ex anation of the proposal including siie, hours of operati , expected traff~ and other features, etc.
i y•♦
, c
4 ' •n
~
e • .
, . . Xctunr~ane °C. WAIVE~R 0 VIOLATION -
1: Now . why was te ,establ ished outside the pravisions of the
Spok~~ unty Zance?
D. SIGN-OFF BY COUNTY DEPARTMENTS,
COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT -
„
AOrel iminary cons-ultation has been hel d to discuss the proposal. The
, appl j cant has been infarnjed of requi rements and standards.
( Si gnature ) ' ( Date (Si gn-off Wai ved
by P1 anning Staff)
2. COUNTY ENGIWEER'S DEPARTMENT
A preliminary consul'tation has been held to discuss,the proposal. The
appl i cant has been i nfo rmed of requi rerrents and standards.
.
S qr~atu &~e ( S'ign-of f Wa i ve d-
by P1 anni ng Staff )
3 COU«'f Y UT IL IT IES DEPARTMEfVT
A p liminary co ulta~tion has been~ held to discuss the,proposal. The
ap 1 i,cant as 'n inf ed o.f requi rements and standards.
- ~ ~ .
~
i g n a =ure e( Si-gn-ofif Wai ved
+ by Planning Staff)
WATER PURVEYOR ( i f appl i cabl e) Name: _
a) The proposal is/is not located vrithin the boundary of our s,ervice area.
b) We are/are not able to serve this site with adequ'ate water.
c) Satisfactory arrangements ha,ve/have not been made to serve t'his proposal.
(5ignature) (Date) (Sign-off Waived
by Pl anning Staff )
, . .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
` APPLICATIONS-BEFORE TNE ZON-ING ADJUSTOR/BOaRD OF ADJUSTMENT
- Ce rti f i cate of Exempt i on No. : Appl i cati on No. :~/tr
~ Nd(T1e of Appl i cant: GC1RL70Pi I'INCM/qnntact: MARY SPRANKLE-BOOTN
1
~"Qot~,. ~Street Address: c/o RasE r_oMpANx, East 9611 Spra'gue Avenue
C1 ty: Spokane State : wa • Z1 p COdQ: 99206 Tel e. N0. : 924-0840
:
~..t-. ° .
Name of P rope rty Owne r( s): HARRY & eEAuLAw STOCKMAN
e, Req uested Acti on ( s)( Ci rcl e App rop ri ate Acti on
, • -
d/r • ,
Vari ancelsl, Condi tional Use Permi t Admini strati ve Appeal
Temporary Permi t Wai ver of Viol ation Other: -
Zero Lot Line Non-Conforming Lot/Use
ar~F z' ' ° :
J
~ ` ::y - ~k' c~r • ~It * * * ~r 'k Ar yF , AC 'k 1!r ~Ar * 'k '~t 11ti ~C ~k k ~r * A' ~t 'br it ~k 1k ~r 'k h 1ti * i4 ir * * #
FOR STAFF USE ONLY L r ,
~ O Pi ~ 4d►-L~~ C• ~te Or.d. ~nance Section : ~~p~ s-c o~ ~ , ' ~ * .
~ Secti on , • ~ ~a ~Xl TQ~rnshtp Rang P Sz : Y
~Existin;q Zoning Comprehensi ve P1 an Desi gnation : ~
Leqat Che-cked by: H.earing Date: Receipt
Existinq Use af Property: One single family dwelling '
PrQpos'ed Use of -Property: MFs
- . . .
,.:o . . . . . ,
St.i^eet Addrtis-s,pf Ptroperrty: East 5912 sixth Avenue
~
.
Centzal Park Add. Lvts
Leqal Descri pti.on of P rope rty ( i ncl ude easemen.t i f appl i cabl e)a :th=,17 r Q, -
inc'luding_ 30-' vac. str.ip S. -of & aclj. Lots 13 thru 17, and 30' vac. strip N. or & adj.
Lots 9 thtu 12•, and incX'u-ain9 vac. 3tfi strip w. ot -6 ad p
i. exce t S. 2a6. /5--keet. EAM4ENT:
OP94 . - - • • . thaof-A wanf' In feet;
1
thepce North` 40 feet on a 23ne .parallel with the West 2ine of Slock 6; thence East 30 feet
to the '1~est llne of Bloc c~'~i, tf~ence Soutf~-teet on the f~est line orMoc~C~~o fr3. '
Parcel; 24532-2204 Source of Legal : Fxrst American Title/County Assess'or
~-Total -amount of ad,joining lan,d control led by this owner/sponsor: Nocve ,
What interest do you hol d in the property: PURCHASER
. Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
N4NE KN06aN
` I SWEAR THAT I,AM THE OWNER OF RECORO OR AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE PROPOSEO SITE.
IF NOT THE OWNER, WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/
HER BEHALF IS ATTACHED.
~
Si gned : Date :
_ . ,
Add S: c/o ROSE COP9PAN , E. 961.1 5prague, 99'2~6
Phone No.: 924-0840
NOTARY SEAL: NOTARY:
DATE :
~ APPLICATIOiV FOR ZONE RECLASSIFIC.ATION--continued-2
This section 'of the application will provide the Planning DeparCment's S.taff wiYh
written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the
agencies identified. R~sults of the preliminar.y consultation should be- incorporat-
ed in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department.
1. COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE -
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our
~ requirements for submittal of this proposal for reZOne have been satisfied.
a ~
.•u _ ~ . ~ - r
CSig2
turev (Date)
2. COUNTY_ _UTILITIES OFFICE
Apr,liminary consultation has been held to d,iscuss the proposal. Our
re uir;ements for 2 ubmittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
T'he esi at ater urveyor for this site is 7_42#j&- e- +cae
igna, re ralCPO
e~
~ 3. WATER PURVEYOR (NAME)
a) The proposal (is) (is not) located within the boundary of our service
area. •
b) Sati sfactory arrangements ( have have not ) been made to serve th i s
proposal.
c) We (are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water.
(Signatu,re) (Date)
4. 6U,1 LDI NG ANO SAFETY DEPA RTMENT
A preliminary consultation has been held to -discuss the proposal. Our
requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied.
This proposal is located in Fire District # .
(Signature) (Date)
5. COUNTY NEALTH DISTRICT
A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. The
applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards.
(Signature-) (Date)
I, TH,E UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT TH-E
ABOVE RESPONSES ARE IVIADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO' THE BEST OF MY KNOW-
LEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM T'HE _4WNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PRO-
P4SED FO,R ZONE RE'CLASSIFICATION, OR, I-F NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS W,RITTEN PERMISSION FROM A.ID O NER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHAL F.
(Signed) Date:
( Address ) Phone :
Zip .
NOTARY Date:
NOTARY SEAL:
SIGNATU.RE OF APPLICANT OR AGEIVT
Da te :
R ev . 2!3/81
.i+ ~
()M'F T C!: ()F CQUNTY EN(;1 NEER
SE'AKANE: CQUN'TY, WASH 1 NGTON
~c_-bczu ~~z~, ~ y..~~
TU: ~Fx►k.~~~~ 1~►itul ~!''l;iitit Ii,i}; 0i•'par t ine•iil
hlttlPl: Wunf.Y ErightPor's I)eparCmenr
SUH.lLC'r: Condt t ionti n E Ajirro,va 1-'l.one Changt--Numhe r: ZE_ ~?j0 : S~ vE /.30'8y
Applicanr's Name r:nc~lr4
Se c t t u n 2.,y •Town s h i p 2,5 N, Ra*n ge Lt,3_E WM
fbe following "condi[inns oE approval" 'Eor [he above-referenced zone change are submitted [o
:1te Spo'kane County Hearing Examiner Commit[ee Tn,r Inclitsion in the staf f arialysis and
'gindinga and order" uf the hearing scheduled two~cZC1n -7 , 19 BS.
Nlrioe 1b The IeOUance Of A Building Permit
1. Applicenk shall dedicate feec on ,
for right--of-way prior ta any uae of the property.
2. Applicant shall dedicate feet on
foc right-of-vay and slope easemente ae necessary prior to any use of the propectyo
3. Applicant shall diMicate a foot radius on
and pc ior to any use of t he pro per tyo
4. ApPlicant eh$11 dedlcate feet on aad a foot radius on
-and for right-of-way pcior to any use of the pro,perty.
D_5 Accee6 permite for appro8chee to the County Road Syetem shall be.obtained from the
SpokAne tbunty Fngineer.
6. Accees permite and improvements to muet be approved
by the Waehiag[on Department of 1Yaneportation.
7e Acceas permite and improvements to must be approved
dy the City oF •
8. (a ) Applicant shall improve FQoac.he~ et~ in a mannec cone-iatent with Spokane
County TYPICAL roadway section No. 1 minimum peving vidth A _ S dC+4*qd,42d -
(b) Applicant shall improve in emanner consistent with Spo-kane
Quunty TYPICAL roadway section No. minimum peving widih .
(c) Applicant ehell. improve in a atianner aonsistent with Spokane County TYPICAL raadway Aection No. minimum peving width .
(d) Applican[ shall improve in a manner cansistent wi-th Spok3ne
Coun[y TYPICAL roadwey Section lVo. minimtim paving width .
(e) •i n FA•vcheR 5 hAll bt°
Gv N-Ag.v_cr . J~JCgu ~1,~ ~r o ~ ~ ~ cte A Gh 'C la
Acr Fc~To 69Mcl~ e r-~ --~-c C~olh~'~,~~l~ ~v►~
9e Appltcent Rlyall 4ubmf r_ fnr appXUVaI hy tha tip„kac» G?ut.ity Engfiieer road, :lr:iinagP, and
acccas plans pT Iot to ttit., !ssiIA11cr, of a hti( Idf nK rormi t un thiN propert y.
10 The app!lcant hhall. sithinfl; Fnr :+rprtiva) hv ll►i, `;pol(aiie Qmtttv I?iiginerr ;ind 1,11e Gp.)kni►e
County Health 111siric•t r-+ r1pt-ai 1et1 r11111M~lod sewagr system :Ifii) silrt:ice ,wat,e'r
dtsposa1 plan f,,r rlie -•ni'ir.p liru ji-rt pri,,r t41 iht- 1`~muaiire if .iiiv litii 1-11iw, ;wrmit 611.1 thP
proprrty.
ovg
'egr l. 6.
.l A parkic►g 1)Iati att.i Ci'jff* t+, c. lrcul.tt lvaii IilA iv shdl l br :;4il1mlCtc.•ti ati, ! a I*proved by [fte
Spok.aiye Guunty Eitgltieec Nriur tt) the la6u~~i%.;e of it buildiiib prrmiC oii ttic proNerty. The-
deBiqn, location, anti arriabemznl oF parking tital ls. bhal L be in ar.c:ordanc:e witti standard
traffic rngineerlnb prac[ices. E'favitig t,r aurfa,cinb ab apNr-oveJ by the Coun[y, Enginetir,
wi 11 be required tor any por t iun of tiir >>roject which is tu be ucc►opleri or travel led by
vehicles.
12o The Word "appllcant" shall includr ttte uwiier or owners uf the pruNt:rty, Iiis heirs,
aesigne, and euccesaurs.
136. 1b condtruet the r-oad l'rnpruvEmeiicb stateJ hecein, the applicant mey, wit?i the approvel of
the Goua[y Engineer, join in and be a wi 11-ing perticlpant in any pet-ition or ceeolution
which purpose ie the formetion of a Road Improvement Dietrict (RID) for.said impravement
pursuant to RCW 36.88, ae amended. Spokane CounCy will not part'icipatr in the coet of
¢heee improvemente.
14. As en alternative cQethod uf wns[ructitig ttte road improvenren[ stated herein, the appli-
cant may, with the approval of the Coun,ty Engineec, accomplish the road improvemente
eteted herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent
of the required road improvecaent. Spokane County will not participate in the coet of
, [?iese impto vemen ts .
.
The oonetruction of the road improvem2"te etated herein ehail be accomplished a8 ap-
pttoved by the Spokane County Engineer. .a~ A11 Zequired improvemente ehall oonform to the current 5tate Of Washingtan Stendacd
9pecifications fot Rodd and Bridge Conetruction, and o.ther appliceble 'oaunty etandarde
' and ot edapted reealutioae pertaining to Road Standerde and Stormwatec Management in
effact at the date of conatruc[ion. unless otherwiae appcoved by the County Engineer.
Applicant ehell file a petition for the vacation of prioc to
aay use of the pcoperty.
V
,~y18o Applie,ant shall eonatruct a paved and delineated accese appcoach(e) tu meet the exieting
pavemeat oa .
~
3~ 19e Accese to Road ehall be prohibited until euch time as epecifically
euthaci$ed by the -Spokane County Engineec.
~a0 Roadvay standarde, typical roadway sectiuns and drainege plan requirements ace found in
• TOO 6cane Eoerd of Gbunty Cummiseioners Reaolution i~. 80-1592 se amendedAo~~ Rar=. e►~p~:~Ablc
Z'4.is QrOOp~a 1 .
~
21 Thie plat oc development prupodal is located within a dcainage basin which hee been
identifled by the Spokane County Engineec'e Uffice ae having etormwater cunoff problems.
Since thie plat or development propoeal is affected by or le a mntributoc to etormwater
flows, property ownere should participace ite the planning and implementation o'f a future
6aainwide etormwater managrment system. The following "Condition of Approval" ehall be
required: Ttiat the owner(d) ur succrssur(s) in in[eces[ agree to join in any County
approved Storm`ra,ter Management t'r.oRram and tp pay such ratea and chacges as cnay be fixed
through public heecings fur eervice or betiefit obtained-by the planning, design, con-
etructing, maintaining, nr upecation oi sturmwater control facilities.
9I1/4
~r
~
t
- _ ' o'asn
L_ _G'~~ i*
,~,J~~ ~ • ' ~ ~
i
~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - .
~i/ ' • ^ . Y ~f
: ~ ~L .~r ' ` ' ~
, ~
' ~ ~ .
, 1~-~c"'^-/ ~ ~
4 ✓ !f ; ~`f . i
s~'---.-
~
i
ttl
-
~ Z
4
,
- t u ll u ~ e Ilre•c s .
1-71"1 o C~ o
~ .
c6
f
.,r. r t
- -
G
~v
~2f, 1?7
~
~ p~I
~ ~•L ~ , I
iOvl ~0 tf ct-C, .
i ;
~,j e- - ~-"CjAea,
~
C~-
C:~ 5 o'Y~ ~ • C Uvc.Q ~ r(~u:~~~,~,v
I7 3 VA c
~K' ~ .
. ~ ►
,
--t ~
/ r f
~
f
.
' Tc,
_
~ ` .
.
~
4`J 1 • _ _ .d.:~~y • ~ ,r •s ►r. ~ , i " " - - . ~ , r yir ! ' • ' -
~ _ 't . , • :
T r~~ ~ t 1 I
~
23 L 7 ♦Y 1 `
~ .,a ► :.►ti
+ G ,
, f
p
'F ~t
~ Y-
i
~ ~ R. ~i0~~d ~I~~ (~AL'~►97~. :
~ : / ~ -l ~'r~~1~► io s•'t ~ r' ~ ~ y
, Q '
µ ~ ♦ o
f' , ' ~ ( 4~ . ' ~ ' ' j t~,~ ~~•f ~
♦~J ~ • C
r 4wl -1
I ~ tri i.~ ~ t J•Irf ~1.~1
~ ~ V 11 11 7 1 ~ ~
r-, ~ ~ ► ~
Z
h .
! ~ \ \ ~ ~ • ~ . , . ~ f ♦ ~ t ~
, ~s 11
~I
J
Q r 8 f J~ u w
1~ PG.
v~ ~ 'I • ' , - - - ~ ,
~c~
.
t F+t rd 2 116
„4
a
4.1
•O .a / _ ,t ~ ~ _ ~ .i-~ _ 1 Z •
rv
' Q~,a~ - ~ ~ • ' , ' i ` ,
~ ~i ~ , ~ ' ~ ~.~1~ G w.~.► '+r I
4.rH rN~
~ 1
n~o y/ i a S• s'' ' r2 a'i• ~ t t t~ ?
, u~
~ , ~ . . • . ~
r1 '14 IS . r~ .s.1• t~ :3 II
l 1y )O 4 il'll i~
`
. i 1970 ~ ~ - B r ^ro•
L T rf v 4c-*A r D ,_...t_ , . . .
~J I • ~ T r
• " ~ t .1 ~ 1i.1 . ~ I . , /G
q . .7
I. ~ «Z ! Y i + o, ~
(.1 . . . f • 1 " 1 ~
2 " .s .s .s „ r., ti 7r ; , O ' G th
- - J d _ , N - 2 09'i S - 5
vo
/ ,i_ '-!~~{XTr
~ • ' ~ . iT ~
u, v►----- _ ~ , ~ . 1 1
.
;1 ; .
i
Q" !t. ' C, ~ e• - ~ ' 1~
~ ~ r . ~ i , ~ ic+~~ 1. ~ rs rs ,c ,r ,t ~s r si :s'r~ s~ ► 7f'h ~ -
~ • ~
• 1' r} y 19 ?b -T No! i978 1"4 Ef'
•~''c`° a' ~ E~~'C~~►. ~Y,IO~~, , . ~0
, ~QO x r s 6± : w . , . V
---7 ~
~ U 14 •t .f 1l_.
~ ! ~ , _ - , ----~'i _ - - - - _ - - - - -
-T-1-
~ . -.,8.,-~~ ' ' , . i , ~ ,
, - . .
r16.2 tt
r
~
~~b~trs YOc.► i►e~ . , t~}.-~.-. _ ~ • . ~ - ~ 4 , r '
1 r• tMr i~ s .~i
I.Ie~J R~i►Ow~"j . Il ~r )f ~G 'y ~ ~ ~
1'~~[ e~ et G 1' ~ C
UONALD HFOSS CENTRAL PARK 11T324 83
C 3GFT STP N OFEADJ l.1TNRU12 E lNC 30FT VAC STP E
~ INC VA LOTS 1&24 E EXT N TO C lN Of YAC 5TN AVE
,a H JACKS.]N GENT2AL PARK 18Y017 8E
~
INC 30FT VAC STP S OFkIAOJ L13Ta17
~
~W H MC COLlt1M CENTRAl PARK L 1 THRU7 ; l
4 95 INC 3GFj VAC STP S OFEAOJ LI8T024 E INC 30
7TN AVE
18THRU2
E OF & AOJ LOTS 1 E 24 EF XT S TO C Lti OF VA -
, . ~ ~ - -
N KCCRLLU~ CEN?4AL PAKK 11TJ1ZEllb
T024 97 INC 30FT VAC STP Vr)F&AUJ L 1TOlA E lNC 3C'F TV'~
.
E AI~J ll~2y E EXT N TG C l.N ~F VAC 7TN VE
K L13-1h-1-
' AIARVIN CENT t~l P~~ ` g7
C L P~rcKk~t
~ - ~ ~ ~ ,'i s i i. .
t'h
. ~ _ _ . :•:i _ '