ZE-32-00
' VED ECE
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER MAR 0$ 2001
SPOKANE G~UNWENGIM
RE: Zone Reclassification from the Urban )
Residential-7 (LTR-7) Zone to the ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Community Business (B-2) Zone; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Applicant: Washington State ) AND DECISION
' Department of Transportation )
File No. ZE-32-00 )
1. SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL AND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a zone reclassification from the Urban Residential-7 (CTR-7) zone
to the Communiry Business (B-2) zone, for development of a private parking lot, on
approximately 19,000 square feet of land.
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions. ,
The Hearing Examiner has reviewed the zone reclassification application and the evidence
of record, and hereby adopts the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision:
II. BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT . A. GeneralIaformation
Applicant: Washington State Department of Transportation, 2714 North Mayfa.ir Street,
Spokane, WA 99207 •
Owner: The legal owner is the Spokane County, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260.
The site is being purchased by the Washington State Department of Transportation, 2714 North
Mayfair Street, Spokane, WA 99207
Agent: John T. Sweitzer, 3939 East Boone Avenue, Suite 1, Spokane, WA 99202
Site Address: 7406-7418 East First Avenue, Spokane, WA
Location: The site is generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of
Appleway Boulevard (First Avenue) and Park Road, in the NE '/4 of Section 24, Township 25
North, Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
Legal Description: Lots 1-4, Block 4, Midway Addition, less right of way, in Spokane County,
Washington.
Parcel Number: County Assessor's tax parcel nos. 35241.0401, .0402, .0403.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 1
. , , • .
L
Zoning: Urban Residential-7 (UR-7). The site is also located within the Aquifer Sensitive
Overlay zone and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the County Zoning Code.
Comprehensive Plan: LTrban category. The property is also located within the Aquifer
Sensitive Area, Priority Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the
Comprehensive Plan.
IUGA: The site is located inside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by the
County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act.
Environmental Review: The Division of Building and Planning issued a Determination of
Nonsignificance on February 12, 2001.
Site Description: The subject site is approximately 19,015 square feet in size and is
currently vacant and undeveloped. The site is located adjacent to both Park Road and Appleway
Boulevard. A 15-foot wide alley abuts the site on the south. Access to the site is from Appleway
Boulevard.
Area Road System: Sprague Avenue, Appleway Boulevard and Park Road (north of 8'
Avenue) are all ciesignated as Principal Arterials by the County Arterial Road Plan. Sprague
Avenue and Appleway Boulevard form a new one-way couplet in the area, west of University Road. Appleway Boulevard was recently developed as a 4-lane arterial, with curbs and
sidewalks in the area, within the rights of way for First and Second Avenue, and within a vacated
railway easement conveyed to the County. .
Sprague Avenue, from University Road vyest to the Interstate 90/Sprague Avenue freeway
interchange, previously existed as a two-way arterial. Sprague Avenue comprises a major
commercial corridor through the Spokane Valley area. The Interstate 90/Sprague Avenue interchange is located approximately a mile west of the site. Such interchange is cunently being
reconstructed, to accommodate the widening of Interstate 90 in the area.
Surrounding conditions: The land lying along Sprague Avenue in the area is designated in
the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, at fluctuating depths north and
south of such arterial. The land lying south of such designation and Sprague Avenue in the area
is designated in the Urban category. North of such designation and Sprague Avenue, the land is
designated in either the Industrial category or the*Urban category.
Appleway Boulevard provides the dividing line between the Major Commercial category and the
Urban category, west of Park Road. East of Park Road, the Major Commercial category lies at
increasing distances from Appleway Boulevard, before widening to meet such arterial a half-mile
east of the site.
The land lying along Sprague Avenue in the area is primarily zoned B-3 and developed with
commercial uses. The land lying north of the commercial uses fronting along the north side of
Sprague Avenue in the vicinity is zoned Light Industrial (I-2), and consists of vacant land or light
industrial or commercial uses.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 2
J
The land lying north and northwest of the site across Appleway Boulevard is zoned Regional
Business (B-3), and is developed with an office building occupied by the applicant, the
Washington State Department of Transportation, and intensive commercial uses. The land lying
west of the site is zoned UR-7, and consists of vacant land. The land lyi.ng south of the site is
zoned UR-7, and is developed with older single-family housing on urban sized lots.
The land lying northeast of the site, between Appleway Boulevard and Sprague Avenue, is zoned
B-3 and developed with an automobile dealership. On February 2, 2001, the Hearing Examiner
approved a rezone of 2 acres of land located at the northeast corner of Park Road and Appleway
Boulevard, from the Urban Residential-3.5 ((JR-3.5) and Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) zones to
the B-3 zone, to allow expansion of the dealership. The rezone was part of a proj ect to redevelop
the dealership on a total of 7.24 acres of land. See Hearing Examiner decision in File No.
ZE-26-00.
The land lying directly east/southeast of the site, along the south side of Appleway Boulevard, is
zoned UR-22, and consists of the remainder of a mobile home park that previously included the
. property rezoned in File No. ZE-26-00. The mobile home park is enclosed with a 6-foot high,
sight-obscuring fence along the south side of 2"d Avenue. Further to the east, the land lying
south of 2"d Avenue is zoned UR-3.5 and is undeveloped.
The Dishman Hills Natural Area, a large conservation area controlled by the County and the
State, is found at some distance southeasterly of the site. Such natural area, which is forested and
mountainous in topography, is designated in the Rural category of the Comprehensive Plan and
zoned General Agriculture (GA). Project Description: The application requests a rezone to the Community Business (B-2)
zone, to allow the site to be developed for a private parking lot. The proposed private parking lot would serve existing offices of the Washington State Department of Transportation, which are
located directly across from the site at the northwest corner of the intersection of Park Road and Appleway Boulevard. A revised site plan was submitted at the public hearing held on February
14, 2001. The site plan illustrates a total of 30 parking spaces, representing a reduction of 5
parking spaces from the original site plan. The site would be paved and have one access point
along Appleway Boulevard.
The site plan illustrates 6 feet of landscaping along the south boundary of the site, 15 feet of
landscaping along the east and north boundary, and 14.5 feet of landscaping along the west
boundary. New sidewalk and curb are illustrated along the frontage of the site with Park Road,
in addition to the existing sidewalk and curb along Appleway Boulevard. Stormwater swales are
illustrated within the landscaping strips.
An administrative interpretation was issued for the site on October 16, 2000, which determined that
the proposed parking lot would be a permitted use in the Community Business (B-2) zone, due to its
similarity to a public parking lot. See decision in File No. AIE-4-00.
B. ProceduralInformation:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14.626 and 14.402
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 3 ,
i
. ,
Hearing Date and Location: February 14, 2001, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: January 29, 2001
Posted: January 29, 2001
Published: January 26, 2001
Site Visit: February 13, 2001
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to Resolution No. 96-0171 and Resolution No. 96-0294
Testimony:
Tammy Jones Scott Engelhard
Division of Planning Division of Eng-ineering
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
John Sweitzer
3929 East Boone Avenue ,
Spokane, WA 99202
Items Noticed: Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, County Zoning Code,
County Zoning Ordinance (now expired), County Code, County Standards for Road and Sewer
Construction, County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and County Arterial Road Plan
maps. County Resolution Nos. 99-0261 (revising Road Standards), 97-0874 (revising interim
regulations for County IUGAs), 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure), 96-0171
(Hearing Examiner Ordinance), 95-0498 (adopting Standards for Road and Sewer Construction,
and Guidelines for Stormwater Management), and 85-0900 (adopting Zoning Code, and Program
to Implement Zoning Code). Final land use decisions referenced in Staff Report.
III. LAND USE ANALYSIS
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
A. Approval criteria . In considering a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that 1) there is
no presumption in favor of the rezone, 2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that conditions
have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and 3) the rezone
proposal must bear a substantial relationship to the public health, safety or welfare. See
Parkridge v. Seattle, 98 Wn.2d 454, 462, 573 P.2d 359 (1978); and Bjarnson v. Kitsap County,
78 Wn. App. 840, 899 P.2d 1290 (1995).
Some Washington cases have dispensed with the changed circumstances requirement where
the rezone specifically implemented the policies of the comprehensive plan. Bjarnson v. Kitsap
County, supra; Save Our Rural Environment v. Snohomish County, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-371
(1983); and Tugwell v. Kittitas County, 90 Wn. App. 1, 8, 951 P.2d 272 (1999).
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 4
A comprehensive plan is considered as a general blueprint for land use regulation. Only
general conformance with a comprehensive plan is required for approval of a rezone proposal.
Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 873 (1997); and Cathcart
v. Snohomish County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Where the policies of a comprehensive
plan conflict with zoning regulations, the provisions of the zoning code will usually be construed
to prevail. See WeyerhaeuseY v. Pierce County, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994); Cougar Mt. Assocs. v.
King County, 111 Wn.2d 742, 755-57 (1988); and Nagatani Bros. v. Commissioners, 108 Wn.2d
477, 480 (1987).
The County Hearing Examiner Ordinance authorizes the Hearing Examiner to grant, deny
or grant with such conditions, modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to
make a land use application compatible with the County Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171, Attachment "A", paragraphs 7(d) and section
11. Development regulations include, without limitation, the County Zoning Code, the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter
11.10 of Spokane County Code). Section 14.402.020 of the County Zoning Code authorizes amendments to the Code based
on any one of six (6) grounds, without differentiating between amendments to the text of the
Zoning Code and amendments to the official zoning map. Zoning Code 14.402.020(1)
authorizes the Code to be amended if it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and is not
detrimental to the public welfare...". Zoning Code 14.402.020(2) authorizes a Code amendment
where "[c]hanges in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to warrant
modification of this Code...". These are the most relevant criteria for consideration of a site-
specific rezone application.
Section 14.100.104 of the County Zoning Code states that the provisions of the Code shall
be interpreted to carry out and implement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and
the general plans for physical development of the county adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners. Zoning Code 14.100.106 indicates that when the provisions of the Zoning Code
conflict with the Comprehensive- Plan, or other adopted plans and development regulations, the
more restrictive provisions shall govern to the extent legally permissible and the Zoning Code
provisions will be met as a minimum.
The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the decision guidelines listed in the various sections
of the Plan should be used as a resource and guide for approving specific land uses.
B. The proposed rezone, as conditioned, izenerallv conforms with the Sookane Countv
Generalized Comprehensive Plan; bears a substantial relationshio to and will not be detrimental to the public health, safetv and general welfare: and complies with the Spokane Countv ZoninQ
Code and other applicable development re2ulations.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 5
1. Applicable Comprehensive Plan policies
a. "Transition policv"
The site is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan, but lies adjacent
to the Major Commercial category. Under these circumstances, the "transition area" guidelines
discussed in the Comprehensive Plan may apply to the proposal. The introduction to the
Comprehensive Plan, on page 11, contains the following statement, under the heading
"Guidelines for Monitoring and Amending the Plan":
Transition Area 7'he area along the boundary between two or more land-
use categories is the "transition area It is the intent that the established
boundaries between land use categories are accurate and definable on the
gYOUnd, but it is also recognized that a specific proposal may cross or be
adjacent to these boundaries and be situated in a"transition area In
these instances, depending on the impacts to existing land use categories
cznd the distance a use intrudes into on adjacent category, an amendment
may not be requiped. In those cases where the determination is that the
proposal is not in the transition area, a Comprehensive Plan amendment
may be necessary.
The Comprehensive Plan glossary contains the following related definitions:
Transitional areas-The fringe areas between two or more Comprehensive
Plan land use categories. This is an area which can allow developments
complying with either of the Land-Use map Categories dependent upon
the decision makers ' site-specific approvczl.
Transitional bufferinz.-Buffering techniques which might be required on
the peYiphery of two or more Corrcprehensive Plan land acse categories to
ensure compatibility. Such techniques might include increasing the lot
sizes on the perimeter of a development which abuts another land use
category to create open space between two potentially incompatible uses.
"Buffering" is defined by the Comprehensive Plan glossary as a"...technique of
separating incompatible land uses by distance, changing density, landscaping, screening andlor
- physical features or structures". "Compatibility" means [when] two different land uses
exist adjacent to one another in such proximity to one another that adverse impacts are
insignificant"
b. Urban cateRorv policies
The site is designated in the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan. The Urban
category is intended to provide the opportunity for a"citylike" environment, which includes
various land uses, residential development and a high level of public facilities and urban
services. It is primarily a residential category of single-family, two-family, multi-family, and
condominium buildings along with neighborhood commercial, light industrial, and public and
recreational facilities. .
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 6
The Urban category recommends a residential net density range of 1 to 17 units per acre.
The more intensive uses in the Urban category, such as light industrial and neighborhood
commercial, are expected to be located near or along the heavily traveled streets. The least
intensive single-family residential uses should be isolated from the noise and heavy traffic, while
multifamily structures will usually be a transitional use located between single-family residential
and the more intensive areas. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 1, "Purpose" and "Detailed
Definition".
The Urban category includes the following relevant objectives and decision guidelines:
Decision C'ruideline 1.1.1 Urban development will be approvetl in areas
having adequate power supplies, water, sanitary and storm sewers,
streets, and school and fire services provided that such development meets
the intent of other Objectives and Decision Guidelines of this section. ~ •
Decision Guideline 1.1.4 A variety of densities and residential uses
should be available to provide a freedom of choice to live in Urban areas
with varying densities, combinations, or mix of uses (see detailed Urban definitions).
Decision Guideline 1.3.3 All Urban development proposals should
require public sanitary and storm sewer systems or interim sewer systems
to protect water quality.
Goal l. S Encourage a healthful and pleasing environment in the
County's residential areccs.
Decision Guideline 1.5.1 Buffering and/or landscaping will be used to
mitigate the differences between proposed developments and existing uses. '
Objective 1. S. c Encourage paved streets and sidewalks in existing and
future developments where they are appropriate to the nature of the
development. Decision Guideline 1.5.4 Sidewalk facilities will be required along
arterials connecting residential areas with community facilities and/or
commercial areas.
Objective I.S.e When a neighborhood experiences pressure for change in
character, such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review.
Objective 1.5.8 When determining whether a proposal will change the
existing land use character of an area, factors to consider may include:
a) the structure height of the proposal in relation to structure
height of nearby structures, and
b) whether new structures will have a positive or negative impact
upon the neighborhood's architectural character.
Decision Guideline 1.61 Before land use proposal are approved they should: a) conform to plans, policies and regulations of County water, sewer, storm sewer,
utility and special service districts;
b) conform to County transportation plans and policies; and
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 7
c) identify and take steps to resolve significant adveYSe impacts upon existing
utilities, (i. e. water, sanitary and storm sewers, utility, available and future
energy resources), and traffic systems.
"Fill-in development" is defined in the Comprehensive Plan as development lying between
and in close proximity to at least two (2) existing developed geographic areas, having densities
and land uses which conform to the Comprehensive Plan Map categories designated for those
areas, and which would aid in the economic support of public service by increasing the cost-
effectiveness of utilities and public facilities and services. Comprehensive Plan, Glossary.
c. Maior Commercial cateRorv policies
The Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan is intended to provide the
opportunity for development of commercial uses, "...specifically community and regional
shopping centers and commercial uses, directly related to major throughways". Comprehensive
Plan, Major Commercial category, p. 99. The Major Commercial category includes the
following additional descriptions, characteristics and policies relevant to the proposal:
Residential use in Major Comrrcercial areas is not intended to be a high
priority in this category and may be limited to preexisting uses. Certain
residential uses, particularly multifamily developments, may be
compatible through the use of proper screening and performance
standards.
The Major Commercial Category will be composed of three different types
of commercial development: shopping centers, highway and arterial
commercial strips, and freeway commercial.
The shopping centers are further broken down into three subcategories -
(neighborhood, community and regional) which relate to size of site, trade area to be served and type of tenants within the shopping center. The
tenants range from supermarkets, drug stores and Laundromats to full-
line department stores, highly specialized shops and professional offices.
The consumer goods offered in strip development frequently differ from
those found in shopping centers. Typical businesses found along a strip ,
often include new and used car sales, fast food establishments, bars and
fruit/produce stands.
Freeway corrcmercial areas are usually made up of more specialized
commercial uses. Freeway interchange areas are usually oriented to
single stops along the freeway for food, gas and lodging.
Major Commercial areas feature high-intensity uses. The heavy
automobile traffic and the related congestion may create pollution
problems, especially along the commercial strip developments.
The shopping center is a commercial development which is generally
designed, developed, operated and controlled by a single ownership, with '
off-street parking facilities placed on the site to serve all of the
establishments in the center. The centers may range in size from 4 acres
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 8
~ with 30, 000 square feet of leasable floor spnce to over SO acres with
1, 000, 000 square feet of leasable floor space.
Highway and arterial strip commercial areas will usually be made up of
businesses on individual parcels clustered along a heavily traveled street
or highway, each providing off-street parking. Shopping is not done by
walking from one store to another, but rather is of a single purpose nature.
Most commercial development will be on relatively flat land and buildings
will be of a low profile. Paved parking, streets and man-made structures
will dominate the srte, with few natural features to be found.
Landscaping, screening, lighting, signage and other architectural
treatment will provide for aesthetically pleasing development.
Pleasing aesthetic and architectural treatment of new development which
eliminates or is generally not characterized by signage clutter, provides
maintained landscaping, screens exterior storage, provides suff cient
setbacks and screens parking areas, should foster improved land use
compatibility with adjacent non-commercial uses and should support
existing and attract new viable commercial development.
Major Commercial areas require a full line of services and utilities.
These include service by, or commitment to, sanitary and storm sewers,
public water systems and underground utilities such as telephone, gas and
electricity. Also available will be paved and lighted streets, parking lots,
street maintenance, garbage collection and police and fire protection.
In most cases intensive farming activities, mining and heavy industrial
uses would be incompatible with Major Commercial uses. Likewise, most
single family residential areas and schools would not be compatible within the Major Commercial Category unless proper screening and
performance standards are established.
Goa16.1: Promote developrrtent of commercial land in a manner which is
complementary and compatible with adjacent land uses and the
surrounding environment.
Objective 6.I.a: Commercial developments should be buffered to protect
adjacent areas.
Objective 6.1. b: Provide for aesthetics of development along County
Arterials and State Highways or Freeways.
Decision Guideline 6.1.1: The best means of encouraging compatibility
between commercial uses and adjacent land use categories will be
accomplished by considering.•
a) orientation of the structures and/or facilrties of the proposal to maintain or improve upon the aesthetics and energy eff ciency of all
areas affected by the proposal; and
b) provision of buffering needs; and
c) provision of lundscaping needs.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 9
r'.r
Decision Guideline 61.2: Buffering or spatial separation between
proposed and existing uses should be required of a developer if
determined that the proposed development's physical characteristics may
be objectionable to future development on nearby lands.
Decision Guideline 6.1.3: Provide for aesthetic quality of physical
development and land use along rlghts-of-way for Arterials, State
Highways and Freeways within the Urban Impact Area (UTA) of Spokane
County as follows:
a) The rights-of-way as described above would be intended to have an
aesthetically pleasing view as seen by the traveling public and
acljacent property owners when they are developed with commercial uses.
b) Standards regarding landscaping, signage, storage and .
architectural treatment should be developed for uses located along
these rights-of-way.
Objective 6.1. c: Require developers to provide sufficient land for off-
street parking at commercial sites.
Objective 6.1.d: Encourage adequate circulation patterns and
commercial areas and provide planned access to public tYansit.
Decision Guideline 6.1.5: Before commercial proposals are approved
they must:
a) conform to plans, policies and regulations of County water, sewer, ,
storm sewer, utility czncl special service districts; and ,
b) identify and take steps to resolve adverse impacts upon existing
wccter, sewer, storm sewer, utiliry, available and future energy resources, and special service district systems.
Decision Guideline 6.1. 6: Before approving proposed commercial
developments, it should be cletermined that:
a) the proposal has adequate on-site areas for existing and potential
parking and
storm drainage control: and
b) the proposal considers the impact upon existing or planned
transportation facilities and conforms to County transportation
plans and policies;
and
c) the proposal considers access to existing and planned public transit and routes.
Objective 6 1.f.• Encourage multiple-use centers.
Objective 6. l.g: Encourage the clustering of commercial uses that are
oriented toward the urban or regional market.
Deciszon Guideline 61.1. 7: Multiple-use clustering proposals
complementary to existing and/or proposed commercial development will
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 10
, be positively considered when such proposals accomplish the intent of
established County policies, stanclards and criteria. Some examples
include:
a) sharing physical facilities such as ingress and egress, parking
facilities, sidewalks, signs, buffering and landscaping facilities; or
b) providing cooperative amenities in landscaping and/or innovative
tlesign features.
Decision Guideline 61.9: Clustering of uses, when it increases cost
effectiveness of utilities and/or traresportation will be the preferred
commercial development pattern.
Objective 6.1 j: Consider small-scale convenience stores and commercial
enterprises adjacent to residential neighborhoods. _
Decision Guideline 61.11: Residential community shopping centers should be based to serve between S and 10 residential neighborhoods or
25, 000 and 50, 000 people. Decision Guideline 6.1.12: Regional shopping centers should be located
to serve between 4 and 8 residential communities, or 100,000 to 200,000
people.
Decision Guideline 61.13: Stores and commercial services established
to serve residents within a few blocks' radius may be considered
compatible, and therefore appropriate, when they are adjacent to
residential land-use categories.
Decision Guideline 61.14: Maintenance of any small-town tax base and
economic vitality should be a high priority when making a land use
decision.
d. Transportation Section uolicies
The Transportation section of the Comprehensive Plan contains the Arterial Road Plan
(ARP) and policies for development of county roads and development of land abutting such
roads. The ARP describes county arterials and divides them into the classes of Principal
Arterials, Minor Arterials and Collector Arterials. All other county roads are considered Local
Access roads, under the Arterial Road Plan. See Comprehensive Plan, Section 21. The ARP characterizes a Principal Arterial (without controlled access) as a 4 or more lane
(including turning lane), moderately fast facility designed to permit relatively unimpeded traffic
flow between major traffic generators, such as the central business district, major shopping
centers, major employment districts, etc. Principal Arterials are considered the framework road
system for the urbanized portion of the county, and are to be located on community and
neighborhood boundaries. The AR,P indicates that it is to be implemented through adopted
arterial road plan maps, adopted road standards, and the County's Six-Year Capital Improvement
Plan. Comprehensive Plan, p. 261.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 11
. • . ' . . . . ~ _ , ~ M n .f.. .•1.
The Transportation section encourages an adequate, efficient, safe, economical and
energy-conserving arterial system; one which provides convenient access to homes, employment,
shopping, personal business and recreation. Decision Guideline 21.4.2. Decision Guidelines
21.4.5 and 21.5.7 of the Transportation section recommend that the function of existing and
future arterials be preserved by controlling land uses, parking and direct access along the
arterials. Decision Guideline 21.5.3 encourages land use planning that minimizes the need for
high capacity transportation corridors, and encourages land uses in areas that can take advantage
of the available capacity of existing arterial streets.
Decision Guideline 21.5.11 recommends pedestrian facilities that enhance the safety and
convenience of pedestrian travel and to provide access to neighborhood facilities. Decision
Guideline 21.1.5 states that sidewalks should at a minimum be provided along all arterial roads
and all local access roads which lead to schools, parks and shopping districts.
The Artenal Road Plan recommends the early acquisition of the prescribed right of width
for Principal Arterials, though actual road construction within such right of way may be
accomplished in phases over time. Comprehensive Plan, p. 253. Decision Guideline 21.1.3
states that the review of land use proposals should contain provisions for extensions, alignments
• and adequate right of way acquisition for designated County Arterials.
Objective 21.1.6 recommends that long-range widening requirements be considered in
developments adj acent to arterials and anticipated arterials, to allow for increased traffic volumes
caused by future developments. Decision Guideline 21.1.13 states that in selecting long-range
arterial improvements, consideration should be given to long-range improvements at significant
locations where such improvements will delay or eliminate future high cost reconstruction. The -
policies of the Transportation section indicate that proposed development may be required to
dedicate needed right of way, or to widen, or assist in widening, existing transportation facilities;
all in accordance with established road design criteria and official maps. Decision Guideline
21.1.7.
The primary function of Local Access roads is to provide access to adj acent property and to
deliver traffic to arterials. Such roads are to be designed and located to provide convenient
access to residential lots, discourage flows of traffic through a neighborhood, and encourage
continuous or unobstructed flow of traffic from a neighborhood to a neighborhood Collector
Arterial. Comprehensive Plan, p. 247 and 260; and Decision Guideline 21.3.3.
Decision Guideline 21.5.10 discourages "through" traffic from using residential access
streets, and encourages making residential neighborhoods more attractive to family residents.
The alignment and traffic control should encourage a slow, safe speed. This may be
accomplished by utilizing physical and traffic management techniques such as offset
intersections, circle drives, curvilinear street design and cul-de-sacs.
2. Consistency of rezone with Comprehensive Plan and development reRulations
The applicant proposes to rezone the site from the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone to the
Com.munity Business (B-2) zone, for the purpose of developing a parking lot to serve non-
contiguous offices occupied by a state agency.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 12 '
. • .
The purpose and intent of the Community Business (B-2) zone is set forth in Zoning Code '
14.626.100, as follows: .
The purpose of the B-2 zone is to provide for the,establishment of
commercial centers which will meet the needs of a community for a wide
range of retail and service uses and to irrcplement the Major Commercial
Category of the Comprehensive Plan. The "B-2 " zone is intended
primarily to accomrrcodate community shopping facilities consisting of
varied retail, service and off ce establishments grouped at one location
served by arterials where they can serve a trade area encompassing the
several neighborhoods, usually within a distance of approximately one to
one and encompassing the several neighboYhoods, usually within a
distance of approximately one to one and one-half (1-1 /2) miles of such
zone. The function of the B-2 zone is to provide a wider selection of goods
and services than can be found in the B-1 zone, and to do so within a.
shorter driving distance from the home than the B-3 zone. It is further
intended that the location and quantity of land in B-2 zone should be
commensurate with the needs of the present and potential population
within said trade area. Any B-2 zoned area should not be larger than
twenty (20) acres in size with frontage on -a minor arterial or higher
classification not exceeding fourteen hundred (1,400) feet. It is intended -
that these community shopping facilities be provided, wherever possible, ,
in one business island centrally located in the trade area or in business .
clusters rather than in ribbon development along arterials or in several
oversized neighborhood shopping centers. General characteristics of
these areas include paved roads and sidewalks, public sewer and water, .
and a full line of public services including manned fire protection and
public transit availability.
The B-2 zone requires that commercial development have the potential for at least 5 acres of contiguous development, including a combination of parcels with the smallest parcel being at
least 10,000 square feet. The Examiner finds that such contiguous commercial development
does not have to be zoned B-2. The B-2 zone also imposes a minimum frontage of 100 feet, and
frontage on a road of Minor Arterial classification or higher. Zoning Code 14.626.310. The site :
meets all these requirements.
The applicant seeks to develop the site for a parking lot to serve its office use located on a
separate site immediately to the north across Appleway Boulevard, zoned Regional Business (B-3).
A public pay parking lot is a permitted use in the B-2 and B-3 zones. The County Division of
Planning issued an administrative determination issued for the site on October 16, 2000, which .
determined that the proposed parking lot would be a permitted use in the Community Business (B-2)
zone, due to its similarity to a public pay parking lot, and findings that the parking lot use was likely
to generate less impacts than a public pay parking lot. See decision in File No. AIE-4-00.
The Examiner agrees with such determination.
The land in the vicinity is served by a high level of public services, including modern
utilities, public sewer and water, and public transit. The site meets the criteria for "fill-in
development". Such features implement the Urban and Major Commercial categories.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 13
The transition policy of the Comprehensive Plan favors approval of the proposed use of the
site. The site is located at the intersection of two (2) Principal Arterials, which would be a poor
location for the development of residential uses under the existing Urban Residential-7 (UR-7)
zoning of the site. The land located northerly of the site is zoned B-3 and developed with
commercial uses.
The land located along Appleway Boulevard in the area, within or adjacent to the Major
Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan, appears to be in transition to commercial
zoning and development, due to the recent improvement of Appleway Boulevard to a 4-lane
arterial, and its new one-way couplet with Sprague Avenue in the area. This transition is not
apparent for the land lying south of Appleway Boulevard, east of Park Road, considering the
separation between the Major Commercial category and Appleway Boulevard in such area, the
residential zoning in such area, the mobile home park located at the southeast comer of Park .
Road and Appleway Boulevard, and the proximity of the Dishman Hill Conservation Area
further to the southeast.
No one testified at the public hearing in opposition to the project. A letter was submitted
by a nearby resident residing on a lot located near the site between Appleway Boulevard and the
alley that borders the site on the south. The resident expressed concern that the vacant land lying
between the site and Coleman Road to the west, between Appleway and the alley, would be
rezoned and developed for commercial uses. The resident recommended that a tall enough buffer
be erected between any business uses developed along such strip of land, to buffer the residential
land uses to the south. See letter dated 10-28-00 fxom Agnes Cunningham. The Examiner
agrees with such resident that any commercial development or zoning approved along the south _
side of Appleway Boulevard in the area should be of fairly low intensity and amply buffered
from any adj acent residential uses or zoning. The proposed parking lot, since it is "private" lot tied to an office use located north of the
site, is a relatively low intensity use that will not create any building improvements.
Development of the site for any structure is somewhat restricted by the applicability of
significant setbacks along its north, south and east borders. The primary issue is buffering
surrounding residential land uses.
The County Zoning Code requires that the project insta115 feet of Type III (see-through
buffer) along the frontage of the site with Appleway Boulevard and Park Road. See Zoning Code 14.806.040 (2)(b) and (4). The Zoning Code requires the installation of 20 feet of Type I
landscaping along the west boundary of the site, adjacent to UR-7 zoning. Zoning Code
14.806.040 (d). The applicant's contention that such requirement does not apply to public uses,
pursuant to Zoning Code 14.806.040 (4), is incorrect. Such latter provision is intended to require
landscaping for public-and institutional uses adjacent to county roads, regardless of zone.
The landscaping requirement adjacent to the alley on the site is unclear. Zoning Code
14.806.040 (2)(b) requires the installation of 5 feet of Type III landscaping adj acent to a Local
Access road. While the 15-foot wide alley is a public right of way, it is well below substandard
width for a Local Access road, is unimproved and is not being used for access. The Zoning Code
defines an alley as a"... public right of way which provides access only to the rear and/or side of
properties abutting and having access to a public road." If the alley is not a Local Access road,
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 14
then the Zoning Code would require the installation of 20 feet of Type I landscaping along the
alley, since the adjacent zoning is UR-7. Zoning Code 14.806.040 (2)(b).
Zoning Code 14.806.080 authorizes the County Division of Planning to reduce required
perimeter landscaping so that no more than 15% of a development site is covered by such
required landscaping; provided, the Hearing Examiner in a rezone situation may prevent such
reduction, or require enhanced landscaping if needed as a buffer. If 20 feet of Type I landscaping
is required adj acent to the alley, approximately 39% of the site would be covered in required
perimeter landscaping. This takes into consideration the 38-foot wide driveway entrance
illustrated for the project along Appleway Boulevard, where no landscaping would be installed.
If only 5 feet of Type III landscaping was required along the alley, the required landscaping
percentage would drop to approximately 25%.
The revised site plan submitted at the public hearing illustrates landscaping widths of 14.5 feet, 6 feet, 15 feet and 15 feet, respectively, along the west, south, east and north boundaries of
the site. The type of landscaping is not specified on the site plan. The revised site plan
illustrates substantially more landscaping than the original site plan. The Examiner finds the
landscaping as adequate to serve as a buffer to the south and west, as long as the landscaping
installed along such boundaries is Type I(screen-type). The alley provides additional buffering
for the residential properties located to the south.
No public agencies requested that the Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the
project be withdrawn or modified, or alleged that the project would have significant, probable
adverse impacts on the environment. As conditioned, the proposal will not have more than a
moderate effect on the quality of the environment, and issuance of the DNS was appropriate. .
The procedural requirements of chapter 43.21 C RCW (SEPA) and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane ,
County Code have been met. ,
As conditioned, the proposed rezone generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan, is •
reasonably compatible with adjoining land uses, and complies with the County Zoning Code and
other applicable development regulations.
C. Conditions in the area in which the property is located have chanized substantiallv since the
uropertv was last zoned.
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors, including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing of .
change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. County
Commissioners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 394 (1993).
As stated previously, recent Washington cases have held that changed circumstances are
not required if the proposed rezone implements policies of a comprehensive plan. The Examiner
found above that the rezone proposal implements the policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Changed conditions have occurred in the area to justify the rezone, since the zoning of the,
site was re-designated to the UR-3.5 zone on January 1, 1991, pursuant to the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. This includes the recent development of
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 15
- • • • ' • : r•..,..._ ,
Appleway Boulevard in the area as part of a one-way couplet with Sprague Avenue, the rezone
of 2 acres northwest of the site to the B-3 zone, to allow expansion and redevelopment of a car
dealership, the extension of public sewer to the area, increased commercial development along
the Sprague corridor, increased residential growth in the area, and increased traffic in the area.
IV. DECISION
Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law above, the rezone application is
hereby approved, subj ect to the conditions of approval attached below.
The conditions of public agencies supplemented or significantly modified by the Hearing
Examiner below are italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction. '
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant,"
which term shall include the owner(s), developer(s) and user(s) of the property, and their heirs, '
assigns and successors.
2. The zone change applies to the following real property: Lots 1, 2, 4 and 4, Block 4 of
Midway Addition. 3. The proposal shall comply with the Community Business (B-2) zone, the Aquifer Sensitive a
Overlay zone, and all applicable chapters of the Zoning Code, as amended. '
4. The applicant shall develop the subject property substantially in accordance with the revised site plan submitted by the applicant at the public hearing held on February 14, 2001,
subject to compliance with conditions of approval and development regulations. Minor variations, consistent with conditions of approval and development standards, may be permitted
administratively by the County Division of Planning, in accordance with Section 14.504.040 of
the County Zoning Code. All other revisions must be approved by the Hearing Examiner,
pursuant to a public hearing on a change of conditions application.
5. The applicant shall install perimeter landscaping as illustrated on the revised site plan of
record submitted on February 14, 2001. The landscaping installed along the west and south
boundaries of the site shall be Type I.
6. Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific
lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permit.
7. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 16
.
8. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance acceptable
to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a performance bond
or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any building permits. Landscaping
shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or
impaired.
9. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice, noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed
as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the
conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded
within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part,
by the Division of Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows:
"The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action
by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on March 8, 2001, imposing a variety of special
development conditions, in County Division of Planning File No. ZE-32-00. File No. ZE-32-00
is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning."
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. "
2. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and
access plans.
3. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage
plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are appliGable. Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit.
4. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance
with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer
will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles.
5. The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing
pavement on Appleway Boulevard. 6. Access to Park Road shall be prohibited until such time as authorized by the Spokane
County Engineer.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 17
7. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane County Resolution No. 99-0265, as amended, and are applicable to this proposal.
8. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
• Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer.
9. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until
a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
10. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards.
11. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities. The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1. A grading permit is required to improve the proposed parking lot. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Since the site is being developed for a parking lot and no burlding improvements are
proposed, there are no public sewer requirements.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
1. All applicable air pollution regulations must be met.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 18
J •
DATED this 8th day of March, 2001.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
MiAael C. Dempsey, WSBA #82~5 (1
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0632, the decision of the .
Hearing Examiner on an application for a zone reclassification, and its accompanying SEPA
determination, is final and conclusive unless within 10 calendar days from the Examiner's
written decision, a pa.rty of record aggrieved by such decision files an appeal with the Board of
County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington. However, RCW 36.70B.110 (9)
indicates that administrative appeals of county land use decisions and SEPA appeals shall be
filed with the legislative body within 14 calendar days of the date of the decision. When the last
calendar day of a statutory deadline for taking action falls on a weekend or holiday, RCW
1.12.040 requires that such days be excluded from the computation of calendar days.
This decision was mailed by certified mail to the Applicant, and other parties of record at
the public hearing, on March 8, 2001. Tbe appeal closine date is either March 19, 2001 or
March 22, 2001, depending on which appeal period referenced above legally applies, and
counting to tbe next business day when the last day for appeal falls on a weekend or
holiday.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal
period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West - Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be
inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays,
between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made
available at the cost set by Spokane County.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-32-00 Page 19
. Es~R"aE A,~""E SEC. 13 T.25N. R.43 E.W.M. • sta, ie+ae.~• ~ caEMU+ Raao
N ~ a z
0 9g1 8 ~ ~ A Cj 660.00 N8873 28 f z UE AVENUE _ _ _ - - - W S
~ SPR _ - ~ 66000' W _ _N88'~3'28_E _ _ _ _ - ' ' ~ ~ MB8'r3'?3'f ° N h ~
~ N887}'28'E_ _ N881~'28"E _ _ - 660,06' ~ o - ' 530.~2. 6E7.p6' 33006' "l Ma8'+J73'f SEC. 24 T.25N. R.43 E.W.M. W z r
W N9E7J'18'E I * a ' 3J0.06. i J10.1 ~ ' v ~
---^----'----"~__`-~-----------'w'_------1 ~ r < J0. j~~ I 10' 10.I ~35241.O1U1~ r ~ _ t ~ Z ~ ~ - ( ~ ' (352~IA108~ (35211.0106} ~ (35241.0104) ~ ~
JO' i 3D ~ 5 , ; 3 i i :(J52t1 0107~ i , Q STA Crr 17a98.27 , f' I' I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I p w ~ w <o,oo~.a._- stei.soo ~sz~~.eoa~ ~ ~ , ps2~~,oio~ i~ . I h'a I ; : (r,~) ~ ~ ~ Z J g W ~ i ~ i I~~~ ~ ~ '~3-12; 3 a ~ t 3-12)
I ~~.J S~ I ~ ` ~3"pg) j ~ niN ~ ~ ~10! ~ I 1 ~ ~ '~l r ~ 3-04 ~ I ! °j ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . ,~151 .J20~ ~ p ~ ~3-0a~ : ~ • . ~
~ Z ~ ~ STA. Cu I )+83.38 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , z ' ' ' ~ , I 5241090 I Q V 30.00 R i , W ~ I ~ ' ~ ? ' I ~ ~ ~ I ; I ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ' f~52`1.020~ ' ~ ~ ~ r ~
i }p~ ~ I ~ , . ~ ; ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I W , o I ~ , : , o ~ ~ ~ ..~J I ~ ~ ~ (35241.096~ J n~ ~ ~ , , ' ~ 5?A..56+01.51 ' vALLEY COUPLE' I ~352410111~ ~3S2~I.0110~. _
~ I S~N i I ' ~ . E CIRARO p(~0 I Q I - ~ ~ ~ I Q nu1 I ~ Nrl I . ~ i O I , e a ~ ~ { s3 > ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ _ r . ~ I ~ I _ ~ ` - , i ~ ~ U g ~ i , ( 3-07 ~ ~ I ~ t ; ~ ~ ~ ~
• M1 I ~ on I , . 3 i..~_.a i . . I ~ i ~ ~S-1S~ = ~3-18~ q~'~ ~ , ~ I 2 ' >6~ ~ I o , i I , _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I J521I.01i^' ~y ' ~ ` ~
` ~ 4 ~ ` ~ °o I¢ ~ I SiA. Of ~15J5 VAL.EY CaIPLET ~~~y ` ~ ^ m I SfA, 49~a7 dJ G VALLEY COL?~ET , ; ~ b~ I • .~,ti y . i • ~ ~ $ r• . S T A 1 5 r 0 0 C O L E M A N R C. • I Q I i . ~ q, ~ , ~ ~ O . CZ DG !A ROAO i 0 n ( ~ . n;( r~ I ~~Q y''S~' v p. 6 . f ~ ~ s
N I O ~ (3524t,090~ I z ~ i ~ ' . , ~n ~ ~ . / _ I ~ o- ~ ! °j~ 9 ~ ~ ~,y Ov hi 5' ~ r~t e . ~ ! ~ o ~ 5' ~ ~ ~d'~~, ~ ~ a _ • , ~
~ I o ~ N 1 ~ 3-1~4 ~ ~ pA e , B e~~' Y>> '\i' I JO' ( 6 ,n ~ \ ao~ 7 o, ~ c~ ~ n m ~n ~ ' 0~ ~ ~ ~ / _ ,i ~ ~ ~ /h y 2 13-1J n `~N *~n 6~~i I ~ ~n 304~ 'L~~~ ? ~ ~ .~.1 ~ ~ . LV~ -
STA 47t66.21 mp / SM6~ ~ i0' JO I ' o _,J._-,_- , , „~~t Naiti s. ~ ~ -T = ~ L_ ~ ooz• aa' sE• ~r, / ~ JI 3 3 ~ _ ~ AVENUE
~ lo~ ~o~ I r ~ e~ s ~ ~ N88U9'31£ FIRST ~ ~ 6 \ ~ ! _ _J °~m °m 'S1"i 1'•,' , I 20. 9 660.dJ' _ _ - ' - aRVE t o ` __J - N88n8 _ _ _ _ _ _ - - !'~n Nm _ 660 ~0~ _ _ I ~~Z j ~ ~ 60+00 ~ -
N ~ N 7i'e ' r:~s•r1'i2'e NUE °z~ ~ - - - - - - - . . 55+00 ~ ~4 ~ r ~ . o N98•, zY ~ 33~.~9~ FIRST AVE _ VALLEY COUPLEfi
N 33~Of - - - / SQ1'S7't<W, ~ ~ 1 ~ i 4 ~ s~CU~tl45, ~ _ . - - - I " a ~ 50+00 ~ _ ix,e.sr_ y= r' ~o s e cuav~ R2 cuev~ s ~ . _ - • . _ 58959'SO.E . I t9.65 , m~ ( ~e,e~ ~ ~ 9 Z ~ n ia ~ In ~ \4 ; ~.e. CURVE dJ ; ~ h ~ ~ i Q 5 h ~n 4~ . • 0 1 f ~
W o ~ ~O.bO - " r~,r !0 ~ 9 g ~ 6 - . ~ JO' 30' ~ ' y ; ~ ~ , w _ ~ N I . , ~ I I _____L.---~-- - 1 i ~ Y ~ , N1 ~ ~ I r^~ `N ~ n C ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ - _ ~
VI I ~ 5 ~ ~ ! ~ ~ - - 3524'.0421 ~ ~ ~ ~ , n-- ~ 3211,040 (35241.0406 ~ (35241.04I q~ y a 1 ~ ~ ~ 1- ~ , - ~sz ra3o~ ~ ps_,~.oaoe) G ~1 ) ~ , psz o a ~ JO' JO' , . - ~ JO' 30' ~ .~r..._.._ _1~ _--..._1__.- • , ~ ~ , ~52410J0 ~ ~ ~ . i ' ~ Li 60+00 ~ Y
~ I ~ ~ ' ~ ' \ - h~ , °24C9?6 ~41.OJ0+ p5.41030~ , ~ I i_,. ~ 3-38 ~ W ~ ~ ~r ~ SZ41.Q39 ' 2ac.0]0 (35.~~ 03C6j ~ i ~ , , ' w( z ~ . - ~ ~ j I r 6 ~ (}524I0~0'! 7 i ~ 352~I.1 n. 4 t t ~ ~ 524I.D3a0 i- I ~27 ~3-28~ ,~,r29~ ~3-30 ~ I, n , s ~ 3524~~1 n04) ~~2:1:1b03~ ~ Q ~ C352 I 60 i ~ ~ ~ 3-24 ( 3-25 ~ ( 3-28 ~ ~ _ . , • ' ~ ~ 3-J1 .
~ _ ~ I ~ , ~ - _ _ , ~-u ) ( ) , , . W ~ ( ) ( ~as ) ( , ~ r~' ~ ~-a~ < ~ I ~ ~=~s (3-~s) (~~a1 I, ; . - ' ~ ~ ~-a , (~-as) ~ ) s ; l 1 . ~ I , . • , . • . , ~ . ~ 1 :
i ? - ~3..~,. ~ .c~r . ~ ~ ~ ~ p ^ ~ ~~,>>i , ~ , r ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ^ • _ I N I ' ~ ~ _ ~ _ /n~ ;a ~ _ i , ' I~ s. f~5241.0321I i . _ ° __r- J ~ti .i~ m L, r 5' -
/`'r\ O~ I i 1 . ~m•;` •I qC 1 I ~ ' : I~r 1 ~ I ~~r Q ~ ~ at Z ,~s ' T \L.~ ~ff ~ i~ ~ I , _ ' - - =~.o° - ` - I-- ; Qr Y ~ f
~ 1 q. sta: s~.sel.~ STa• fi0 01. 1 ^J L~ - ~~t ~STA. .7+56.21 'n~ ~ - i .~~n Q~ - . L - ; f~.. - Q' - 7 iA. 5+16 r5 I ~ 39.00' R 39.00' R t3' i _ ~ ~ L 39.QQ' - 3 - ~ ~ I ~
- ~ STb~ r7.o;,ii E~~•~,. ON ~ 39.00' R ~ Nn I~ Ta ~s1. , ~ S9.Q0~ ti 5 A: 48+35.81 I~~~.,,, I o ~ I SL' STA• +9E , S1A~ 53+J I.aS~ o~ ~ 0 R ~ STA: 9~4 jQ I I 3400' R..`~~'~~' ~r ~ I w r y~ 39.00 it 3900' R ( 2 Q ~ 39. 0 Q 39.00' R STA: 4¢+' 7.3fi ~ N n s, s•!, I ~ I
S~A~ d9 p S ~ STA; a+]0.45 ~ 39.00' R ~ 39}'0~ ~ z z ~ I'~ • ' ,.4 $T~~ S~+T~ t5 STA. 55~,17 89 ~ Q , STa~ 56+47.A8 ~TA: S~f~ {,~7 Q~ S1A. 46+~).39 r ~ Q > 39.90 H 39.00' R 52.00' R ~ ~ 39.00 R 39.OD' R
I 5.00. R ~'STA. a9' 17 BO ~ 's ~ 4 STA; 9+9L7B STa 5~+5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 52.00' R I g Qe I~352 10JI0~ 3900' A .STa~ 5~+19.<5 39.00' R ~ ~ STA. 6+3789 STA~ S~rl e7 Q STA. 4 87.27 ~ • ~ ~ ~ SO.n' R ;"i ~352N.1609~ w I ~ J900' R . ~ a ~ ~ I 52.00' F 39.00' k
~ `i~ I J Nn ~ 3-JB ~ STA 9 77.80 ~ 51@u Rt39_~t I I ~ Q ~STA a5+7B. 0 ~ (}-3g~ I Q ~ ~ SI.00' 8 I~TA~ t)ti58~5 39,00 /r I ~ ~]9.00' R 2 5~.00' A ~B ~g ;p ~ ~ !1 iP 19 !3 ~6 _ I
. i ^~'`n„ ~ ~J ~5 16 1y o ~ ( . , ~ ~ ~ P~ !2 19 i ' t. JO 10'
I JO' JG' ~ ;L,•~~~~. B g ~U J ~ AVENUE ,B~ SECOND _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - h i ~
h - - ~ ~ ' I ~
- - - - , 4 ~ , ~ h. t I
_ ~ IG i , i , i I
~ i i i , ~ i ~ i i 15_
i i ~ i I i~i 'j'~~ I I ~ ~ ~ 4~,,
LEGEND I ~ ` ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I : ¢~anr~c ttN¢a u+cs on ao wcnwtHrs - I ' ' ' '~~,ti : R;.i~t ~ ~ n ^ , , ~
vqaPOSED CEniER W+(S ~ ` t--.. ~ ~ ~ I I i%iSTWG fnrMr 00 xar Urc;S I I , . i ~ I ouuro~0 ~iar oC w~r lu+ES I i, i:' I
FROGO%D Rlpii OF'naY µ~5 I I ~ I CMaEa4n7 Uw[S SCC~On UrdS I (
~/i SttnaN LL~5 , - - t/i6 iEC~MM1 UNfS tar+s~~ucnoH vtawr ur~s ~ CURVE TABLE I ullu~r EaSEw[yt lw(5 9: g4+a0 7.Q ,00' R
p~p t i.p. 0 ICUR4E P C. STA. ~ P,T, STA. ~ RAOIUS DELTA I TAN(;ENT ~~NGTH CONSiBUC~+ PC?YIt ~WE NAP+cCR f+.+a a~~ 1 I Se+1a.~7 , p+ . ,~UU G„ 1 I L.
~ z i i i iaai.oa'! SrO~oe~i i i.~7''i l.fi~ v~arn ~uwecp ( 2-02 ~ i 3 i ~ i~i.ao i a1'2+ i~ i ao.oi i eo.6a i ~ i ~~as~.oo i p~z~• -I 3o.a~ i eo.~6 ~
ROCK NUM2EF ~CL ~ptE9lwE 0~ Exi57w0 ROw ~ 5 ~ 1 t45i p0~! 02'~2' S~ I ]0.20'I 6U.79 ~ AEUnriC/mStuiCE ~9'~I'P7~' 16 /7
~ 0 ~
50' 0 50' 100' ' SCALc tv FEET 0 n
ror
~ I I Ra' ~BK~H ~i9~ SCALE Spokaae County APPROVED: COUNTY ROAD PROJECT ~VO. 2396, VALLEY COUPIET I I pealgned By. Department of Public ~Yorks
I ~ P34 ~ 97 HORIZONTAI• a 50' 1026 vleal Broadway A~e PWIS E~ CONTRACT ENGINEER COUHTY ENCINEER RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN ~ ~ I. ISEE SHEEi N0. 13 FOR REVISiOrV NOiES. Chacked BY Spakane, 9A. 99280-0170 THIERMAN ROAD TO UNIVERSITY ROAD
No, Onte I Bv fCkd Aoor Revrsion C'tt ~k Cro ~2/97 yg~~pi. N/A ' (509! ASB-~800 Dele: Dole: T.i.B. PA0.£CT No. 9E-031 (003)-1
~ e ~5 ~,s E w M o~
_ ~ SGRAd1E AVE T 2~N R 44 ~ - ; ~ ~ SEC 18 n e N n t~ 5tA 26+53 20 ~ PARK RO Z
o ~ 1 0~ el ~ _ - '
: ~ N ~ SPRAGUE AvENUE _ N~~f•E - _ W ~ 13'+~, - ' t25770 19 v~i ~ SPRaGUEavENUE_ ______~-r r . N N887)2H E ~_Sryj29 f _ ' ~ SEE OETAI~ "A (THIS SHEET~ ~ _
66000 ~ 650P0 24 ~19 I FOR D£SIGN ?ARCEL No 44 E W M ° _ EC 19 T 25N R - a-i a-2 & a-n S _
z ~ „ ~I ~ ~ Q~_ ~ I ~
u, • STA ~ p6+0360 ~ ' STA P 26+03 92 ~0 / SJ 97' R I~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ )9' 39 - - ~ ( ` 5 U2 l ~ r STA P 25+88.54 r1R5T AVE 7U£ - I
~352tt Oi~ ~ I 39 00' R I I W Q I / ? +5000
4-OJ p 60 H r~`„~ ) ` Z Q I ~T~ P~5+88 72i I - '`S ~ ~q ~ rd :300. ~ I ~ O I >o~~ Z~fr
o a~ I 4 ~ ~~Up ~ c ~ I µ , ~ (fj ~ ~ ,
b`t4*a ~ ( ~p Y I P+00 00 I ~ I ~ ~ L . , ~ ~ 70 ~ ' _01_____ _ , + Q '0 ~ r- o ~ECdt+D FrEt+uE
~ iq o ,a , N ~ ~451929105~ ! ~ / ' sao~ ~~ti " a- I ~Y~- ~ L----` f ~+-a~ ~ I ) ~
~1S2~iq10] ~ Q ~ ~ o. ~ ~ ~y~ ~ ` ~ ~ >{451929i47~~4-14~ ~ECONO~~~~~ ~ I N TA ? ~ ~ r i ~1-~S~ ~9` ~ ~ a ° ~ S 2 28 92 ~ ~ ~ ' _
7900` R ' ~ ~ Q r~' ~ ~ I ~ ~r ~ S ~ ~ `9 I ~n r , ~i / p r5 ~ Y A j I ~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° 3 I ~ sp'~g~ ~~51929t0~~ ~ ~i ~ 4 / ~ 11+IRO A 1EWUE ~ ~ o~ I R l 4-07 ~ THIRD AVENUE I ^ - r r-
o ~o I - ~ 1 ~ ( ~ ,~,N ~ I C +
~ s~ a, a F O Z~ ~o~ ~ I z~ I s ~ s t s I d t h08 1 C }q ~ 7 S tA P 2 2~ 9 8 B1 {-12 J ~
~ ~ _ ' A ' <s~9~s~« ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 3900 < < ~ i TOTAL PARCEL DETAIL ~ r+88 OS J~ c STA P 23+5919 ~ i0 }0 I STa v 22+92 79 ~4-I I~ ~ ~
a h e~o•~ s9ao ~ ~ '~sa~,,,.p --J MAP No 04-14 z _ _ - - ' I ~0~, ~ Sfa P 22 Bt 7a F _ ~ ~ ~ FIRST AVENUE W ~ ~o;, ~ SCALE ~ = 200
' z ~ CuRVE 9~ ~°vn I r,! , ~J s~ J+ N _Iy-- N1O ~ 39 ' 4 SIA~fi2+7]O6 Q vaLLEY COUVLET
p J J-i ~ r ` n~ ~ t 1 ~S1A~?jr58 il PAAN AOAO l ~ o ~ , , ~ e ~ 5192 960f~ ` W , ~ ~ I % , r- i z NRVfI~ I~ 9, ~ r4-to so
, + 1 1M w p ` ~ . I PERMPNENT ,ASEME+vT UNE ~ 50 ~ ~ ~ ~ aRVEIg»--+~9 I'~1 r q \ t ~ ~~r ~Z ~ ~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CuRVE s" ~~6° a~.. ~ y , . il - " ° ~ ~
g ~ ~,r`' , r`~ ~ I _ ~-~--~'i ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ( I~ ~ I N ~ ~ S'~ C~°,.... i ~ ` h~• ~ ~ rc - ~Y• T'~ ' I r ~ ~ " 6 ' ~ P •°°~~i° ~t ~ ~ °,~b ~ UNION PACIFIC I t
. ~3i2~i OW2~' A q /35tl R ~ r ~ I ~ 6 e y✓~ r' ~ Siq C 29+O~SI R~AO ( (~2 ~ ~ s , ~ ,~o ~ 3~ ~ R AIL ~ ~4-OB 33 0 ~UR4E ~5 aw ~ ~ f ~ 4 ° +~`i )9 ~ Y ~ 6 35 I _ I f
. ' ~ h09 ~ 1 w I ~ d ' S~F ~ f l ~ ~ . r ~ ~ I Sic~ 60 6I96 ~a700 L 0 ti~~' 1 ,I t I 0 ~ , ~ ( J9l00 RC ~ V°'~ c ~ + 1 ~ d , ~ > ~ JS ~5 %~O ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~,s~ i~~ ' r ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 1 I I
Si~" ~Qt+~6 31 1 ~,~r" a+ t` Y r '~°s so ~0 1 I 4 0~ I Y= 8' 3 E i 4~' ~ . C O ~ ~ ~ ~Q p~ ~ h Q k j5 ~ ~"@d 3 ~ ~ ~ 7 9 0 0 R ~ I J 7 J I STA ~ 2 1~ 7].A, ~ ~ - ~ ~ , - ~ ~ ~ ~~P ~ > > I I
~ t . I 5 6 0 l~ ~ 4 5 A a ~ d~ er ~ C ~ SSI~490S3 ~ ~ I ~ - -~-~~y~- ~ ~ ~ o \ r 3 ~ a I ~ ~ ~ Q ~ I S 1 A 3 6 2+~ 1 9 5 ~ t~~ ~ ~ + s \ ~ S i A 7 a 5 1 6 9~y ~ ~ s I ~p~\ I I I I
I39Q9 R o`p 3 3 I m ~ ~ ~ A'1690 ~ ~ ~ Ds ~ ~ / ~ W ~ ~ 5~~~*'~12«i12~ / ° I r ~ o I Stn P 2B+a3 Si I Z~ ~45183 916a~ I a , _ I I I
S 00 l W~ I ~ ~ ~ 41 84' l \ J ~4-17 , ~ I Q x \ ~ I \ I Y I ) I Sia P~ 21+67,G I d~d \ ..i N fi~ C ~752~10~17 ~ h ~ ~ ~ I I ~ 3300 l ~ 2 ~ r . ~ I ~Q + ~ ^Q „ ~ Q ~ I
~ s n zi ~ w i (~-13~ti I ' ~ » s a y ~ ~ ~ Z~ ~ t Z Z ~ ~ e ~ ST0. 69+33.6J / ~3513a 9054~ p'~ r ^a ~ I ~ uu ~o ~n v~ ~ 4'~ y0 0° ; ~6 ao ~ I a I I I
< < " ~ 4-02 ; ~ I sra vtG+2.ia l N N r~ I . I ( ) a. I u o F. F- ' 1 d ~ r'+~•~•, O I w ya ~ ~ ~ I L~''~'~ ~ , I o ' ~ ~~`T' , ~ , ~ i , ~ ~ I I
"~-~i ~ sra~~~ di ss/~ ti e~ ua~E ~~i I ~p 3s 19 < ~ I~ - •°~i 79 OOy;.4 ~ a~ l~ P i I 45 22 y 0~ ~ S~RAGUE AVE ( I I
l7 IB 3~ SJ ~ 45192914t a I s930 l 1 - Q h ~ S1A ~ 20+Z368 O ~ S1A P 20+}29y E ~ ~ v js = SiA 16+532U ~~4RK HU I ~y~ l O ~500' R „Q, SiA 27~25.85 I W } ~ ~ M„~'' STA 67+9b45 UROE ,/G STA 68+2~ 16 - ~ ~ t5 22~ L ~ a ~ tu ~ ---1
_ _ _ --p~M" ~ o ~4-14~~ 5267 R~ 3900 R r r. d5 ~,~n I - ' N A P 19~fi3.91 ~ _-______-_-L`\ l~ r' i ~ N n I I
N E I 4500 R ----'----.r,- ~ ~ ~ i °~,N ^ SPRAGUE AVENUE i OND AVE U I ,,,~r' a v 57A G Z7+OJ86 0 SEC sr e9+sooo/ z ~ c,~ ~ i~ , t~' aaao ~ ~ ~---r----- 1 4$ 6311 R/ hG I u~ 13 NA6581d E,_ ~--1 1E i i ---1
~ ~ ~ ~ ,a'" ~ w~` ~ I NAB'13 29 E _ - 1257 70 ~ ~ _ o ~ ~ - - N0~ ~ ~+1 ~ 66000 24 ~ p ( i i
,,.t'ti.,.. ~ Q ~ ~ o ~ R TH A I I~f Ns f''`R H A ~ P~ ~ " ~ I I p ~ sra P 19~0~ !~E E CQU S 0 0 ~5E VE TRAI_ER hRK 8Y ~ ~ i<s.on:~'• SPOKANE COUNTY AN ADDhTIO~IaL 20 FEE.i 4f~R~`QAC RIGHT i
' I z~ ~ w,. 1 O f., 4~ A Y W A S 4 E D I C A T E D F R O M T H E E A S T S I Q~-` O F F A R K R O A D ~ z ~ ~ I Y AJO ALONG E'VJESFSIQE OF"ROSE HAVEN"ZRAIL~ER PARK DETAIL A
~ ~ J51410501 ~ ~ r ' ~ ~ ~ o ' 1 I N PAR iV 4- 1 4- 4-17 Q -~-~~g I Q I w r ~ 4519291~3 - DES G CEL o 0 02 & ~ ~ a, J~, ~ ) bIo SEE SHTS FOR ADOTIONAL EASEMENT DATA SCa~E i= 50
I , ~ y°'"~,,,,.~ A • ~ ~ ~ y : L~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I^+
! ~ G ro ~ =1 ~ ~ O d ' ~ ~ I__ _ m 30 J 0 l i..
^ M'j1 ► 50° ~ ' ' j ' 1 LEGEND ~ , CURVE TABLE I ~j"" ^~n I C"~ ,~v ~ . f ~+"~„py ~ c i~nHG C~niCR UtES W IXD ~UfI~M[s+r5 - i I O y~,,.y 1 a,} WRVE ~ P C STA I P T STA RApIUS OELTA iAMGENt I LENC71i vacvOSEO [Er+r a uvES 75 -
. ~ QT A P^ i'8+37 JO ~ ' I i t . i c+ i~aa c i s n n c ~ i a~ a w~ r u w E S I~~ I ` ~ 3 1 ~ ~ y + P+INPO~D ~CNf Of WAT UNC$ ~ ~ I ~ Dip~ ~ ~ ( I Ibfi1 ~U~ I 02'22'S7'I I ~0 ~2 ~ 9QC~$(Q AI~Fi C~ W\Y ~N[] ~ ~ ~ ~+r'° 1 ~ i ia t. 0' ~ oiro 'O7'I 5i <7' i i02 90~ I wN ~o „
~ 4 P.~ 3. o t~s i ts _ ~ I W ~ j~ ~ a I I~]6 W 0034'4i' I 81 40'I 122 73'I ~~Ctqn wE5 I ~ ' a i id~i.oq i pz ~4 t~~I 5~ Bi i~5 "so i v ucna+ uycs j ~752~t 45~8} o n ~pe su~au unEs ~ N o p ' H ~ ~ ia~a.aa ~ oj 3s~i@- i9 e;' i 39 ~a I ra
~ y ( hIB I 3S~5~o i ~ i i ~s~a.00'IQ~15'~8"I 65.7~]I 131.36'~ U~TNTrp~154MEnl~lpl~5"~FS N ry 0 v~viiv 0 O
O ~ ~ ~ I N ~ r~ (QM$IRU~110N P(RWI mE ~+~aKEA tt4 I t''~ _ r- , Sl p a Y
~ ~ r o a~ H~w~cp (o~oo) I _ _ _ - (Q0-00' i ~ ~ u 1
----~---l9 -J JO ~ JD f ^ ~d° ~ o a~ooc nuuetR j ~i ~ r IRO AVENUE ~ `uLr r.r r E ~ TH 50 0 50 IQO ~t~nwaas°~7~cfSCInC POw n e~ ~a~es n a THIRD AVENU ~ _ _ ~ ~""`i q ~ ~ r~ SCALE iN FEET n Qy 12 es w
- " - I, f ~ t ~ r^ rur v.ur ~ I I ~ I RA.V~4F~i7 ~~ie~ Spokane County COU~VTY ROAO PROJECT NO 2396 VALLEY COUPLET rII e w4F r 1'J R tIMY.
I I I o~~ R~a a SCALE De artment of ublic ~Yorks APPROVED SI I I I c ~g,~ Rer i=;o P ~ozs w F a« auns a~ cor~rR.cT errc~Kee~ cour,rr RIGHT-OF-WAY PLAN Z!4 HORIZONTAL r9t Broodwny ENGINEER JPLET SKEET
~ ~ ~ ~ ISEE SHEEi NO 13 fOR RENSION NO1ES ~hw~~~~ er ?~97 N~F Spokenc wa 9,,:60-01'0 e THIERMAN ROAD TO UNIVERSITY ROAO 4 No 1 Dnte I Bv 4CkAa4porl Reviaion '~~~a (S09) .~~g-36oo ~~~Q ~ 1Q i i B~ROJECT no 4E-032 (003)-1 4 of13
l0i ~~~E 'tor oATe o-jil 00
S Er,-z4 T25MR-,4 3E-
i a ~C~ 1`. I 400
r
v N
e 4". ' 1~ L J~n/ STO"~ E e{~ I h' Oa 2 /
~ oHI ~~vB r / 1d
'~•~I/✓~ RAGUE AVE _ IAPPLEWAY) No 2312 - 100'
- ~ 5 ?
_ ~ ~ ~'si=($},~j _ Y L ='✓MAC-~Ub - '1
~ . ~ - -•fT'
I ~
~ r 7 j i 7 7 l N[ ~ t 7 i 7 Q i_ro7A_ c~o_ Q
~ ~d O' ~ F R ~7 1.9
• R, ~ 1
1n j a v t
«4 J , ~ t. ' ~ ~ s s ~ : ~ ~ . , , . . , • ` ~ • x d s , • . a r . , s a
r Y ~ 1 < 0 0' ~ I I
0 (
/ ~ ♦ 11S ~L ~.8~ ^ ~~O ~ t c ~ ♦ ~ ' ~ ~ r c " ~ ~ ~ ~ n e r ~
/ 2 i ~ + c • • • ~ 0
~ s~ ~v 11 SEGO 3EG0 C Q
~YdC79
\i' i H7M I ~ i
L9yiY '44Lj 1 ~~a n ~ t Vvoc
s si 7 f sa
iiN~~n s1
e s tl e7 ~x ~s i~ rti a ~ s3' .
z110-00 AvE ~ No ~ 66 S •
l ~TP
URKFM
~ ~ -(N'rb 01 RL ' 4 `
~ ~ ft ~ ] 1 I t
F t a• f♦ a
y 4 H f N L> ~ ` 1 O
e e
F, iy B c~ - IFTM
r ~
.11 Y n w n f I > ~ i s> > b
. c~ V
~ I
Ns Z091-45 50 ,e 6th Ave S 10
~
~ BixTH E
I~ rt n w ! )
~ - IG i1 1Z II 10 9 8 7 h S 4 ~ L 1
~ qth ~ N Y
er No 1971 ,b SEVEN~1?
00
~ I H - Go
• ~770-
~ Nu 19 •
~ X,a s`~ ~ 1- I) IL Ii ~0 9 l 4 3♦
J
a3
en"
A. rrc 2009
y
Parcel 35241 0401
Owner SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS DEPT
CoOwner
Owner Address VaII@--U , 1~
1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE WA 99260-0001 USA ~
~ ~jrF
Site Address 7418 E 1ST AVE SPOKANE
~
Legal Description ~
MIDWAY ADD LTS 1& 2 BLK 4 EXC VALLEY COUPLET
l _ _
ZPLJO
~
~
7m
DD
Im
~eh= f~
RJ=
=M
zg=
~
it rr-r~rri-t-m I CTrf -1
Notice This is not a legal document Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision It is intended
for reference use only Legal documents should be obtamed from the appropnate agency
~
Parcel 35241 0402
Owner SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS
CoOwner
Owner Address ~Valle~.~L~~~~
1026 E BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE WA 99260-0001 USA
~
Site Address
0 ADDRESS UNKNOWN SPOKANE
Legal Description
MIDWAY ADD LT3 BLK4 EXC VALLEY COUPLET co
~ [T"Upj _
-tst-
~ .
~ ~
9 013~~~ ~
~ F ~
~ ~
~ fi= -
ua=~ - ,
Nobce This is not a legal document Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision It is mtended
for reference use only Legal documents should be obtamed from the appropnate agency
. y
Parcel 35241 0403
Owner SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS
CoOwner y II ~ I 1 I l I
OwnerAddress VaI ~ •~~~•~-~'L'
1026 W BROADWAY AVE SPOKANE WA 99260-2050 USA
C
Site Address
7406 E 1ST AVE SPOKANE
- ~
Legal Description
MIDWAY ADD LT4 BLK4 EXC VALLEY COUPLET co
IT4p~a6ual
7 I -
~
T-M
DD
~ID _ _ ~
7
.
~
. ~I r-r-r-T7-r-rT-n
Notice This is not a legal document Data depicted on this map is general & subject to constant revision It is intended
for reference use only Legal documents should be obtained from the appropriate agency
ZE-32-00
VicinitY MaP r
Cenienn~ai M~~'d1e o
Bxoadway
~ o
W ~
. ~
0
. U
ea~o~
~
v dkrwa
~
~ ~
~ 13 ~ ~ngto 1 `
w
eat '
S
~-F-~-+--k -
~
Spra~.ue . ' ~
p,lkplew4.v , ` ~ v ?,nd A le way
~b A a~i C~7
~
4tb
irett HemeifftaXV
~
~
$ib
~ 4-tb
w ~ 19
-
249
0
t~ V Ub
~ 121b ~
~
oa ,
nch - 833 ft(rounded) 12104/00 Y~arnty Malp
cca{e 1 i
~
~ - e _ _ _ . ~
t
RECEIV~D FivEo
SPOKANE COUNT~ ',E COUN7°Y
7 4 ~ ~ 2 8 2000
L n ~
~ ~ LL J DIYISION OF PLAHN) ~~ss~oN I I ~ I M-PI omeufInk
~ ° ~~+K ¢ ax ~ o i' w M EL ~L Q } F- ~
G~ S TQ a AV R ~ a• ~ zO J~a a ~x ~ate November 2000
~ 003 o~~E SHAq (~a a W 'S Q G r'7 Q 1L ~J ~
AVE w o a o ~ ~ cWn ~VE~~ ~ 1 I ~
~ ~ A licant Washui ton tate D S e artment of W ~T~,~ao . Pp g W c P V o } = Q < Pnr~
Z ~ QEAN p ~ a' Jr,P3igM ~ MALLON Q~ ~ Trans ortat~on , . ~o~ - f p
~ ~ MALLQra AVE cP`P o avE A VF Z p ~ c~ m ~ I U
~,I SAqiNG~IELD p.J~ _ Address E 7406 741 w l Q 8 F l r s t A v e n u e
AL;{f ~ AVE1 AvE ~~0 ALKt ~VE ~"tu ~ti ~~u ~ ~ ~ Q W V
VAI.LEY WAY, ~ VALLEY ~ , ; Parcel No 352410401
A'~ i roixON HARR 1
MAu~ ~ MA~N ~E ►vcT 352410402 ~r'~, ~ o o~ ~ AVD ~ an~s86~a O A~ ~ h'~
rq o,~ a . E o 352410403 ~ 4 ~ c~, , ~A ,
oi = ' ~5 AvE ~ r , ~ tst c~n W~ I~ I AvE , `
~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ Ex~st~n ~-7 Parcel ~nd ~ ~rl R~E t ~ g
Q '~J O 1'~ ~ ~ (3rol W ~ I ~vE Zone
~ , ~ ~ ~ dth AVE ~Prati Sch cdgeci~fit ~ R PROJECT ~0 ~ATION , o~
` E Q 0' Z c Nos~ita l ~,,In z~ AVE , ~
~ ° ° W ~ Ex~st~n Use Vacant ~ ~ ~ ~ irt Parkin Lot P Ein I AVE ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ o - ,
~ ~ 71h _ ~ Q ~ k AVE Q i ~ ~ ~ Edg~clrtP Para ~ s~h m u A~E-
Pro osed B-2 Commu ~ Z ru Buslness o a p ~ 9~n ( ~ ~ ~ ~ AVE o
m'~ ' I Q ~ ~E Z = I { t01n I'~CEME~~RY AVf ~ P ~ne ! Q v.~ z ~ ~ W ~~r P _
~ o I itn I I I c~ avE ~ o w ~ o 0 Z i- ~ I I I P~ 4
U 12th ~ N O AVE Q' ~ Q z~~~w - Pro osed 34 s ace ff ~ ~ o street arkm lot
Q , _ ~ P P p g ~ ~tn f ~ avE r , ~ tL~v ~ ~ z ¢ W aVE 9 4 USe
~ o a~ . ~ ( th e ~ ~ F~ ~ F a~o A~E a = Fq o 9 L~
u~ ' Y ~ F~y I I 1 a o►c~iNs N
E,~ AvE ~ ° o Site Area ~ , Q 1901535SF ~ z y. ~ a oR ~
cL ~ 9 I18c~ AVE~ " o Q Mb r ~ecr, Av~ w~ _ ~ R~
W ~~4 L~E 0 ~ ~ ~ en S ace ~ o /o of site not covere ~ P d with avin
~ a o P g m m Q 9 9 ~ _
~ . , .'o r '
j L.j i~ J ti~! d r'.~. ~L ~ ~ i
~ AECI~ ~ r i . ~ ;4 I I I I I ~ ~STa~q FED AID PROJ NO E~fVIRONMEN[ALANO EIdGINEE4! I
I I I I I M6 ~'A~~ AN D F1 OESIGNED 8Y I~N-aaar►~+ ~ RST AVE I I 10 WASH i '
EN~ERED BY Ia`~~fr~-c~i I I I ~ ~llashan ton ~va4e P~R~~ ~ s . ~ g NG l.CJT ~ ! ~
CHEC~cEO BY le Eu~us I I ~ De aa~m PROJ ENGA a r~~,ES p ero$ of T~~~os~o~d~roon ~r ~T I f 91EET t E i
J REGIONAL AOM. ~ cN'~ f f I, 0011"~T ~ ~ u~ ' ~ OaTE ~ OA1E C REV15fON ~BY) PLAU ANO SECTIOPI VI~'~iS GF f t
SH Ei~ ~ SHEE t°
~
1M►c~ostat~onln~rkinalot cian 1 1113/2000 02 33 30 PM
v ~ * w . ATED PERPENDICULAR
- ~ ~ 60 +0 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ALL PARKING STALL STRIPING SHAII BE LOCATED PERPEI
~ ~ TO THE EDGE OF PARKING LOT ASPHALT, SEE DETAII SHE a ~ DETAII SHEET 3
a _FA 2 SIDEWALK LOCATED PARALLEL TO APPROACH SHALL N~ ~ 3 , CE OF CURB .LA ruA I I uAr~u 2~t~-M14:1:{.E I
c encK oF o M CEMENT CONRETE APPROAGH CENTER PROFILE OF APPROACH SEE SECTION C-C ON SHEET 2 4 SHEET 2 SIDEWALlC
sioEwauc ~ • L I N E L O C A T E D A T A P P R O X I M A T E I Y PARALLEL TO APPROACH AND OFF OF PARK AVE SHALL E } C E M E I~ f T C O N C R E T E 6 0+ 6 2 M A T CH IXI S TING APPROACH , o ~ S I D E W A L K ~ ' INSTAII TYPE B PRECAST DRYWELL AT 4' T H I C K P O R T L A N D C E M E N T C O N C R E T E AVE SHALL BE
~ A B A C K E D G E-, 5TA 61+50 IN CENTER OF SWALE TOP 3 N U M B E R S I N P A R K I N G S T A L L S A R E F OR CONTRACTORS N • . ~ NTRACTORS
o , aF swA~E OF INLEi SHALL BE B° FROM THE BOTTOM ' INFORMATION AND ARE NOT TO BE PAINTED ` ~ . _ ~ ~ ` OF SWALE 3 4 ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CON TED
_ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ p INCLUDING PROPERTY LINES Y O ~ , ,~~4 17 Y THE CONTRACTOR,
~ -O LANDSCAPING
a ~ _ ~^y> ~ s` d ''~;i _ ~ o ~cv a ~ ~ 5 IANDSCAPING ALONG FIRST AVE SNALL BE LOCATED II 0 15 ~ . ~ ~
o ~15 a Z c--~ R R R s WIDE BACK SLOPE OF THE SWALE,SEE PLANTING DETAIL S LOCATED IN THE 4 5' G DETAIL SHEET 3
Q ~ ~ R ~ LUMINAIREc R J ~ 35 34 33 32 R R 6 MOUNT L MI AI E ` ~ 31 U N R S ON 30 ROUND ALUMINUM POLE,
~ Z 30 29 ~ , 2a LIGHTING #RSA 30 7E DMl9 DDB OR APPROVED EQUAL
26 3-36 25 24 7 LUMINAIRES ARE SHOE BOX STYLE, MANUFACTURER LITH( ✓ED EQUAL
i 3 23 ~ CEMENT CONCRETE ` 2~ zo r-sio~vn~K sra LIGHTING #KSF2 400S 240 RP04 DDB OR APPROVED EQI ~ ~ 19 TURER LITHONIA
o ~ ~ 62+30 70 72 5 RT 8 LUMINAIRES SHALL HAVE 400W HPS LAMPS WITH 240 ~ J o, 4 PRECAST CEMENT CONCRETE 4 1 rn B BUMPER CXJRB o ~ B TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, VERY SHORT AND FULL CUTOFF 'ROVED EQUAL WITH 240 VOLTAGE
~ ~ c~ . ~ z R T 9 BREAKER SCHEDULE FOR TYPE B MODIFIED SERVICE _ CUTOFF
~ 5 Y b0A MAIN , t iERVICE
I 2 3 z C~, , I ~s ~ ~I ~ 30A CONTACTOR 18 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ~ ~
, 16 ~FACE OF CURB 1e ~B , 2P-20A BRANCH-ILLUMINATION 17
~0 1P-15A BRANCH-SPRINKLER ~ r BACK OF 0 ' SIDEWALK IRRIGATION SYSTEM
~ . , r ~ ~ 5 WIDE LANDSCAPING 10 LOCATE SPRINKLER HEADS AT 5 ON CENTERS
- ~ ~A STRIP ALL THE WAY AROUND EDGE OF RIGHT OF WAY L cuRaiNC _ 11 THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN ~ , i PROPERN CORNER ALIEY 62+30 70 101 35 RT INSTALLING ALL WIRING AS SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACI RS
STA 60+00 137 51' R7 ° TO CONTROL TWO SEPARATE CYCLES ~ ►YIDING AND : MAN U FA~TU RER ~
~ . : 12 IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED B` ~
o ~ ~ MANUFACTURER
a 13 PARTS PROVIDED BY E SPOKANE WATER DISTRICT SHAL , ~ ~ ~ INSTALLED PER E SPOKANE WATER DISTRICT REQUIREMENT ►t
0 20 40 CURB AND SIDEWALK 14 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT E SPOKANE WATER DIS
SCALE IN FEET INSTALLED BY COUNTY 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING FOR CONNECTION TO 3TRICT, SHALL BE
MAIN AND INSTALLING METER ASSEMBLY ~ 5 F :QUIREMENTS
~Y ~f , WATER DISTRICT
0 52~ --TION TO 4" WATER
~ E ~
IRRIGATION SYSTEM, ~ 25' CL A ACPJJ IRRIGATION SYSTEM,
SEE SHEEf 2 0 50 CSBC SEE SHEET 2 BACK OF SIDEWALK w ~
SYMBOL QTY ITEM SYMBOL QTY ITEM
NTS LUMINAIRES, SEE LEGEND AND C~~- GENERAL NOTES THIS SHEET PRECAST CEMENT
CURB, SIDEWALK AN~ SWALE 661 LFT nPE A CURB, SEE SHEET ~ 17 CONCRETE BUMPER CURB TO BE INSTALLED BY COUNTY A-3 IN COUNTY STANDARD
~ LANDSCAPING 5EE SEE WSDOT STD PLAN F- ` ~~LEGEND THIS SHEEf PLANS M
oQ 1 TYPE B DRYWELL, SEE BUMBER CURB i~o 7 RED MAPLE ~ „ „ COUNTY STD DETAIL Bl-~ ~i.i-
OCTOBER GLORY c~ ~ ~ 4 JUNCTION BOXES, SEE ST~ JMPER CURB, TD PLAN F-1
~ 25' L A ACPJ IRRIGATION SYSTEM ~ 0 C o so cssc 5EE SHEET 2 92 COLUMNAR ARBOR VITA PLAN J-11A ~ a I,iFF
4' HEIGHT MINIMUM 3 SHOE BOX STYLE, LUMINAF INSTALL TYPE "A" CURB AROUND o 92 DETAIL Bl-A
0 TALIOREGON GRAPE BOTH SIDES OF PLANTING STRIP )XES, SEE STANDARD
~ 24 MOUNTAIN LOVER ' 1 EA TURN ARROW TA ~ S, SEE S N
~ 19 WOODS ROSE PLAN H-5C TYPE 1 AND (LE, LUMINARE
I I I I REMO~ISTATE~ FED.AID PROJ NO ENVIRONMENTALAND ENGINEERING I I I I SERVICE CENTER ~ SF~sroNnaRn
PARK AND FIRST AVE DESIGNED BY ~AN-BRASCHI I I 10 WASH ~ ENTERED BY ~AN-BRASCH ~ i ~ WSDOT P~RKI LOT IYPE 1 AND~ TYPE 2R ,
NG JOB MU16 R Washmgton 5tate cHECKEO BY IB HIIMES I I I E wip 17
PR NcR s H~u~ES Deparlment of Yransportaiion OJ E I r I I REG[ONAL ADM. I~ I I I ~TRACi MO
~ DATE ~ DATE I REVISION BY PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS ~ .7 LOT SMEET
I OF
IEWS 3
v ~ .
IRRIGATION SCHEDULE . ~ m
_ ~ PATTERN QTY PRESSURE RADIUS ~ SYMBOL NOTES MANUFACTURER MODEL p, PSI FT GPM ~DFL
~ 1 1p3 15 5 10 ~ BUBBLER RAINBIRD• 1804-SAM-SH-B a BO ]4;..SAM,...SF-R
~ ' 90 15 0 5 d BUBBLER I IRD' 1804-SAM-SQ-B a ~ 3 5 RA NB
C I ITEM QUANTITY S~E SYMBOL NOTES o ~ - ~ _ _ ~p~q ~ r ~
} i ~ , - CONTROL VALVE 2 EA q" ~ RAINBIRD 100-PEB"
° ~ . ~ N I 4'` ~ SCH 40 GALV STEEL PIPE 2~' 2" CONNECT TO 4° WATER MAIN IN All R MAi ALLEY
0 f - _ , • I T ~ ~ i ~ ~ 8~ ~ , SCH 200 PVC, TEE ~ Eq 2° r~y
g i ! ~ SCHEDULE 100 PVC PIPE 165' 1" i `
~ 85, i STA 60+23 49 5' RT ~ ~ SCHEDULE 200 PVC PIPE 185' 1-VI'
a n ~ ~ ~ , a i 1 dio . 100 SCHEDULE 200 PVC PIPE 190 2°
~ Z ~ H PV 1" ~ SC 200 C,ELBOW 1 ~
a i ~ 1" dia 1-12" dia SCH 200 PVC, ELBOW 2 ~ i ~
~ i SCH 200 P'VC, ELBOW 7 ^ - ~ ~
LL i INSTALL SERVICE POIE DIRECTLY ACCROSS ALLEY FROM D(ISTING 4 2N SERVICE POLE LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF ALLEY SCH 0 STL WYE STRAINER GALV STL, SEE SHT 3, DOUBLE CHECK VA UBLF CHECK VALVE ASSEM
~ ~ ; APPROXIMATELY 142 LT OF PARK AVE CENTER LINE MOUNT SCH 40 GAIV STEEL TEE 1~+ 2" W/PLUG SEE SHT 3 DOUBLE CHECK VAU F-- u ~ ]1 C /^uCr^V \IAI\/C ♦eer~~`~ 3~-f Y`.
o ~ MODIFIED TYPE B SERVICE ON NEW SERVICE POLE, AND , J ~ CONNECT TO IXISTING SERVICE POLE VIA OVER HEAD SCH40 STL BALL VALVE MAN 2 EA 2 GALV STL, SEE SHT 3, DOUBLE CHECK V~ 11BLE CHECK VALYE ASSEM
i ~ CONNECTION CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS PER AVISTA ' SCH 40 STL GA1V UNION 2 EA 2" SEE SHT 3 DOUBLE CHECK VALVE z i , ASSEM :K VALVE ASSEM
Y REQUIREMENTS ~ ~CH40 STL 3WAY BAII VALV 1 EA 2" GALY STL, SEE SHT 3 DOUBLE CHECK V~ i 1JBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEN
i INSTALL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER PUC-SCH 40 STL ADAPTER 1~ 2' SEE SHT 3, DOUBLE CHECK VALVE ASSEM ;K VALVE ASSEM
~ CONTROIIER ON SERVICE POLE STA 61+89 108 RT AUTOMATIC COMROLLER 1 fA RAINBIRD RGC LOCI(ABLE WATERPROOF 5TA 60+94 124 5 RT ~ ~ E, WATERPROOF CABINET'
i 30 P51 AND 60 GPM SCH 40 5TL GALV 90 ELL 4 EA 2" SEE METER ASSEMBLY SHEET 3 ~ ~ PER LEG T" dio ~
~ ~ N ~ 2" dia _ PLASTIC VALVE BOX 1 EA CARSON-BROOKS #1419124 W/BOLT DOWh , 1-V1 dia ---v u ~J i~ ~I _u'u~ _`l~'~_ _ ~ -WBOLT DOWN COVER'
CONCRETE UTILITY VAULT 2 EA BROOKS # 6~P8 BODY' L - - - - - - - - - - - -
~ - - - - - - - ~ 81' ~ o r 98 CONCRETE UTILITY VAULT 4 EA BROOKS # 66-IXTENSION 0
cv ~ ' 85 VAULT CONCRETE COVER 2 EA BROOKS ~ 66-PB BOLT D WN W/METE ~ „ 100 GPM , o R OWN W/METER FUP TOP LID•
o IN b0 PSI AND 1 . 4 WATER MA ~ OR APPROVED EQUAL a ALLEY DOUBIE CHECK VALVE, WATER METER,
AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES AND PLASTIC ITEMS BELOW ARE PROVIDED BY E SPOKANE WATER 2#8 IN 1" CONDUIT TYPICAL VALVE BOX A55EMBLY SEE DETAII SHEET 3
DISTRICT #1 AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR I E WATER
IRRIGATION PLAN SENSUS METER 1 EA ZN MAX FLOW THROUGH METER 60 GPM TRACTOR
~ ~ ~ „ BACKFLQW PBEVENTER 1 EA 2 GALV STL SEE DOUBLE CHECK VALVE AS; METER 60 GPM & 30 PSI _
O 2 O q O TAPPING SADDLE 1 EA 2u ON 4' OD STEEL 'k-
S C A L E I N F E E T ANGLE STOP FIANGE 1 EA 2" SEE MFfER ASSEMBLY SHEET 3 ~
MEfER FIANGE, 90 DEGREE 1 EA 2" SEE METER ASSEMBLY SHEET 3
BACK EDGE CORP 1 EA 2" SEE METER ASSEMBLY SHEET 3 .t6-
Of SWi4LE MEiER GASKETS 1 EA 2" SEE METER ASSEMBLY SHEET 3 = 6' ' 4 5` _ " _ b` _ 4 5' - EET 3
~25' - , METER BOLTS 1~+ SEE METER ASSEMBLY SHEET 3 PARKlNG L OT EET 3
-2% ~ ~ Q +5 0% MATCH APPROACH TO
„ ~ -133~ , - I ~ - ~ EDGE Of PARK/NG LOT
EX/ST/NG CEMENT ' - 0 25' CLASS "A" A C P ~ BA K C Of
CONCRETE S/DEW~4LK q 0 50' C S B C SWALE
4" CEMENT CONCRETE PA ~EMENT
C-C DRIVE AY A D W N APP ROACH DETA~L THROUGH
CONTIN O L U USSWAE
NTS
J
~ ~ ~ ~wo~ ISTATE~ FED. A I D PROJ . NO ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING I I I SERVICE CENTER
OESIGNED BY aN~~, PARK A D FOR T A E I I I N $ V ~ 10 WASH } NTRDBY ~ E E E IA.N-BRASCHI I I VlPashm on State AVE
~ WSDOT PARKBNG LOT CHECKED BY IB HIUu1ES ( I I J68 NUMBEN LOT
PROJ ENGR s H~u~es Department of Tronsportaiior~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • REGI ONAL AOM I~~~~ I I I CONTNACT tl0 SNEET 2
~ DATE ~ DATE ( REVISION ~er IRRIGATION AND LUMINAIRE PLAN OF RE PLAN 3 SHEEfS
.w i r~ 3" BARK MULCH ANCHOR RODS AS SPECIFIED
w BY MANUFACTURER t a rPVC IATERAI LINE ~ ~
Z ^i ~ ~ / i w + ~
~ ~ I TOP SOIL ,o Z r_"-~''~-~T-~ - -
~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ e Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
TRENCH BACKFILL~ ~ ~ i~~ i i i i i ' ~ ~ 1' ~ ' ii__~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~o ~+--~-~-a - ~ 45' 4A 6u x ~ i ii ii i ° , J
t~ . 1 CONDUIT ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_i_JJ_.,~ I i i
~ 6^ ~ a a SEE PLANT y~ r rT- rr ~ w ~ ~ 'LANT
~ #4 HOOPS 10 CENTERS ' ' ' ' ' ~ MATERIAL LIST Q ~ ~ I L1 LI I RIAL LIST SIZE AND TYPE
PVC PIPE INSTALLATI ~ ~ FOR SIZE AND T ON ~ Z w NTS ~------------i -ClASS 3000 CONCRETE FERTILIZER (SEE . '
~ EIGHT #7 BARS EVENLY SPACED~ ~ PREVIOUS GROW ~ ~ SPECIFICATIONS) Z , rr LEVEL AT FINISHE OUS GROWING AT FINISHED
~ ~ ~ ~ , PRECAST CONCRETE 2 c~~ruwcE , , GRADE ~ EDGE OF PARKING LOT ASPHAl7 ~_____________i BUMPER CURB F
~ F` ~ I w ~ FEATHER MULCH IER MULCH TO
o ~ >E OF PLANT
~ 2 0' MIN DIA BASE OF PLAN' ~ 90 ~ I ~
~ 3n MU~CH ~ ~ IlCH
~ 'a; ~ ~ r
LU T AI RE F TI D ETAI L M N OU DA ON N 18' T ► s
N s ~ BOTf OM 01 (g . 4 r r~ zOTfOM OF SWALE
~ n y ~ ~AA Ir {i w "~4 W1DE WHITEJ . i , a TRAFFIC PAINT „
0 4 MIN- y~ THREE WAY BALL VALVE
~ WITH COMPRESSED AIR FITfING
~ AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER TO AUTOMATIC 2 TIMES r~- BACKFILL WITH CONTROL VALVE , ROOT SPREAD ~X~STING SOIL
10 4Y1'E PVC ADAPTER
WATER SUPPLY STRAINER M SLOPE PLANTING - CONTAINER TYP PARKI NG STALL FROM METER ~ r
o ~ , , e oo , o - a J NTS
UNION UNION 1 a
2" BALI VALVE 2" DOUBLE CHECK VALVE 2~ BALL VALVE
TO LEFf LEG TO RIGHT LEG OF SPRINKLERS OF SPRINKLERS CONCRETE UTIUTY VAULT- PLAN VIEW
AUTOMATIC CONTROL VALVES THREE WAY BAII VALVE FILL WITH
_ _ ' r 2` ANGLE ~ • • • • U CONCRETE UTILfiY VAUIT- 2" ~90~ METER ING SOIL
PLASTIC VALVE BOX, WITH ~ WYE TEST COCKS ~ STOP FLANGE qp METER ANGLE FLANGE BOLT DOWN COVER t I``~' TRAIN p S ER 2 UNION rGASKETS]
~ I~ ~ T . ~ . r~~~ DOUBLE CHECK VALVE o 3° MIN TYP fAiNER
~ ASSEMBLY AND PLASTIC 4„ = 36" ( TAPPING i I~ METER CONCRETE VAUIT VAIVE BOX SEE DETAII 8 ~ _ I 8~~~ 1L
_I 2" BAL1 I GAIY PIPE ~D~ - I-I I~ AND LID W/(2) ~ THIS SHEEf 2" UNION ~
~ VALVE ~ 4u WATER n - I n IXTENSIONS ~ ~ 24" MIN ~ TO AUTOMATIC _ qg _ 36 ~ _
WATER SUPPLY-~ -I t I 1' tl - CONTROL VAWE MAIN METER 3" MIN ~ - 2" GAU - ~ + 2 DOUBLE SENSUS -Typ _ , ~"J ~ FROM METER , ' -rr _I ,
CONCRETE VAULT CHECK VALVE _ ~ 24" MIN ~ AND LID W/~2) ~ : ~ - _ _ "
TEE W/PLUG pyC - ~ ~ - IXfEN510NS WATER METER TO D~
` ' ' ASSEMBLY SEE ADAPTER r- - ~2" 90 DEGREE ~ I VALVE EIBOWS .1 THIS SHEEf SWING JOINT I i~ M) METER ►1E FLANGE
FROM WATER MAIN ELEVATION VIEW coRP sroP ELEVATION VIEW
VALVE CLU TER AT TILiTY A LT - 5 U V U S ~
DOU~LE CHECK E A VALV S Y SEMBL ETER ASSE BLY .r=
NTS NTS NTS ~ -
~ - -
I I I I pENO~ Srar FED. A I D PROJ NO ~ ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENGINEERING I I I I SERVICE CENTER -
DESIGNED 8Y AN~RASCH PARK AND FIRST AVE I I I I 10 WASH NT R Y + ~
E E ED B IAN-BRASCHI I I Washmgton state WSDOT PARKING LO~ CHECKED BY I B HIIMES I I ~ JOB NUMB£R ~ nrlii ini e rlurcy
PROJ ENGR B HI E Department of Yransportat~on I w~ s ~ I I REG[ONAL ADM ~ 1 LENZI ~ ~ I CONTN~CT NO
I DATE I DATE i REVtsto~ lev DETAIL SHEET t c I ~
~
w
~ O ~O O i~
~ a R~C~ l. All PARKING STAII STRIPING SHALL BE LOCATED PERI z IV~ j~ ►CATED PERPENDICULAR
~ SP S Q I TO THE EDGE OF PARKING LOT ASPHALT SEE DETAII S T , { w KAN E c P EE DETAIL SHEET 3.
~ ~UN ~ 2. SIDEIAIALK L CATED PARALLEL T ~ FACE OF CURB O 0 APPROACH SHAII 3 . F kCH SHALL MATCH
4 sncx oF ~(ISTING CEMENT CONREIE APPROACH ` PROFILE OF APPROACH SEE SECTION C-C ON SHEET ' ~ SIDEWALK CEMENT CONCRETE P A R A L L E L T O APP ROACH AND OFF OF PARK AVE SHALI DN SHEET 2. SIDEWALK ( AVE SHALL BE
~SIDEWALK C 4 THICK PORTIAND CEMENT CONCRETE.
dIY 3. NUMBERS IN PARKING STAII ARE I ~ !Sl s ~oR cor~r~c~o ON 0 ~ ~P LAN ONTRACTORS
~ NING INFORMATIQN AND ARE NOT TO BE PAINTED ~ ~ti ~ . . , 4. ALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FIELD VERIFIED BY THE CC JNTED BY THE CONTRACTOR,
" ~ ~ . . INCLUDING PROPERTY LINE . w _ e S
~ ~ ~ Q _ , 5. TWO EXISTING TREES ON THE LOT NEED TO BE RE ~ i TO BE REMOVED.
Z ` o ~ ~ . ~ 4 19' _ , - ; ~ LANDSCAPIN ._.L~ - L~ 19 a ~amr~c rowEa ro~ G
V. p~ t'R p R r z START Of SWAIE l ~ C R ~ 1 WIDE SIDEWAU( 5. IANDSCAPING ALONG FIRST AVE SHALL BE LOCATED ►E LOCATED IN THE 4.5'
v 5EE SHT 4 FOR STA. q,i ~p ~ WIDE BACK Sl F T W I o OPE 0 HE S ALE,SEE PLANTING DETA L ~n o ~ 29 ~g PIPE, 5EE SHEtT ING DETAIL SHEET 3.
, z~ 26 ~~R p~~ LANDSCAPING AIONG EAST AND WEST SHAII BE LOC~ 4LL BE LOCATED IN THE
° « ~S 24 ~ CENTER OF SWALE. IANDSCAPING ALONG SOUTH SIDE ~ 3~36 23 Zz r ~ i~ 3 2~ 20 LOCATED WITHIN THE 6' WIDE PLANTING STRIP. iOUTH SIDE SHALL BE TRIP.
w 19 ~B LUMINAIRES
~ ~ ~twtr c~M cowc~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ 6. MOUNT LUMiNAIRES ON 34 ROUND ALUMINUM PO' i eur~ cub F~cE oF c MINUM POLES; LITHONIA
~a. ~ wi~e R o,sx IIGHTING #RSA 30 1E DM19 DDB OR APPROVED EQUI 5 5 OVED EQUAL. 4CTURER LITHONIA
UNDSCAPINGSWAIE 1. LUMINAIRES ARE SHOE BOX STYLE, MANUFACTURER LIT ~ AROUND THE z, ~s- ~ °c~"° cou►~m s~E LIGHTING #KSF2 400S 240 RP04 DDB OR APPROVED E ~PPROVED EQUAL.
B ~ 11 12 13 14 I B SMT ~ FOR ST/t AND DETAII ~n WEST SIDE ~-~s 6~ a 9~o , , 6. LUMINAIRES SHALL HAVE 400W HPS LAMPS WITH 240 5 WITH 240 VOLTAGE
w ~ o ' ~ 16 11 (o. I TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION VERY SHORT AND FUII CUTOFF, ~ ~ (n~.. ~ o roj(c, - - - _ ,;i= - _ - - e~uc oF . BREAKE H F TYP IFI JLL CUTOFF.
~ _ _ 9 R SC EDULE OR E B MOD ED SERIIICE: ~ I , ~oEwuic ~ ;J~- - ~ - ' WIDE lANfiSCAPING5W/1lE 6~A ~~N SERVICE:
+ I ~ AROUND THE SOUTH DE ~ - A CURB NG AlL ARQUND_i ~ 15 WIDE IANDSUPING~SWAIE 3OA CONTACTOR
SOUTH AND WfST SIDE AROUND THE EAST SIDE PROPERTY CORNER ALLEY 2P-20A BRANCH-ILLUMINATION
STA 60+00 137.51' Rt. START OF SWALE 1P-15A BRANCH-SPRINKLER
INSTAII 2 TYPE B PRECAST ORYWEII AT SEE SHT 1 FOR DETAII IRRIGATION SYSTEM ~ A IINE STA.STA. 0+06 AND W IINE STA. AND SIi1' A fOR ST~ 10. LOCATE SPRINKLER HEAQS AT 5' ON CENTERS. TERS.
~ o+oe AN~ o+~a iN c~NtER oF sx~.E. 11. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING E tOVIDING AND
TOP OF INIETS SHAII BE 6' FROM ~ ; ~ INSTAll1NG ALL WIRING AS SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFA me eonoM oF sw~. 0 20 4o TO CONTROL TWO SEPARATE CYCLES. HE MANUFACTURER
SCALE 1N FEET 12. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHAII INSTALLED AS SPECIFIED ; SPECIFIED BY
MANUFACTURER.
WEST AND SOUTH SIDE SWAIE CURB ANO SIDEWAIK PREVIOUSLY ~ P V iN r n 3. PARTS RO IDED BY E. SPOKANE WATER DISTRICT, SF~ IRRIGATION SYSTEM, STALLED B THE COUN . )ISTRICT, SHALL BE
WITH TOP Sall, INSTAIIED PER E. SPOKANE WATER DISTRICT REQUIREMEP SEE ~ETAII SHEET 2. SEE SHEET 2 REQUIREMENTS.
14. CONTRACTOR SHAII CONTACT E. SPOKANE WATER D °.52% ; 48 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING FOR CONNECTION TC JE WATER DISTRICT IECTION TO 4" WATER
~ t~ , ~~~-EAST SI E lAND5CAPING MAIN AND INSTALIING METER ASSEMBLY.
, 0.25 Cl A ACP~ ~ IRRIGATION SYSTEM, 0.50 CSBC- 15'
SEE SHEET 2
SYMBO QTY. ITEM SYMBOL QTY. ITEM NT5 LUMINAlRES, SEE IEGEND M1D 7EM
„ ~ PRECAST C MEN CURB, SIDEWAI.K AND SWALE GENERAI NOTES THIS SHEET 320 LF PE A CURB, SEE SHEET d 28 ME NT
ro eE iNST~o eY courm CONCRETE BUMPER CUI DSCAPIN IN COUNTY STANDARD ~ WEST AND SOUTH SIDE ~ s~E SEE WSDOT STD PLAN BUMPER CURB,
i SWAIE Sff DETAII SHEET 2. LEGEND THIS SHEET PLANS. - Qo 2 TYFE B DRYWEII, SEE STD PLAN F-1 NEII, SEE
BUMPER CURB 0.5X ~ ] RED MAPLE ~ N ~ COUNTY STD DETAII Bl D OETAII Bl-A
- OCTOBER GLORY , ~ 4 JUNCTION BOXES, SEE , 0.25' Cl. A ACP-~ , IRRIGATION SYSTEM, 30XES, SEE STANDARD
o.so cssc-' 92 COLUMNAR ARBOR VITA PLAN J-11A SEE SHEET 2 ~
LANDSUPING, SEE LEGEND THIS SHEET 4' HEIGHT MINIMUM 3 SHOE BOX STYIE, LUMIN ANO SIOPE PLANTING DETAII SHEET 3 INSTALI TYPE "A" CURB AROUND o ~ TYLE, LUMINARE
0 9 TALL OREGON GRAPE BOTH SIDES OF PIANTING STR1P. TURN ARROWS, SEE STA WS, SEE STANDARD
~ 24 MOUNTAIN LOVER PIAN H-5C TYPE 1 AN[ NTS TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2R.
CJ 19 WOODS ROSE ' 15 LF 8" THERMOPIASTIC PIPE 'LASTIC PIPE
~ I I I I "~;~a ~STATd f ED. A I Q PRQJ . NO. ENVIRONMENTAL ANO ENGINEERtNG
I I I I s~AVicE c~R PARK AND FIRST AVE OESIGNED BY I~N.-Bw~SCMI I 10 waSH 5T AVE
r ENTERED B ~AN.-BRASC l WSDOT PARKIN L01 G Washmgion Sfate I G LOT
CNECKED Br Ie. Miu~ES I I 'a Department of Tronsporfation PROJ. ENGR. ~A HIlMES ~ ~ ,
REGIONAI, AOM. (1. LENII ~ ~ can.a ~o. PLAN AND SECTION VIEWS a VIEWS 4
I OATE I OATE ~ REVISION IBY SHEE iS
. ~
I'rrJcCI 3tatuS acti. e E~'T GINE E R' S RE I EW S H E E'1
E3uilt Plans Rcceived Rczone File ZE-4032-00 'rw
ftosui f'lans Approvcd Corripantun Files
kI1ZtS 1:Ji~•h Sii.`. %1`. i:3r
lZClBttd I'iICS:
F{euring: 02/14,72001 10:30 13itilding Ih:pt:
I rJtinical Rrvzcw 12114l3UOU 1:15 -
Hanrnrd kd Pian
Prrlimmary 12rview: TypC:
Iargc t_at l3Wg- Syuam Fect
nate Receivcd: 12.1 !i -1 i`s;') No. Luts' ? No. r1rteS: 0.44
Project hame 1•12- i"I'n R-Z PARI11NG LU"1' 34 SP WSD4T
Site Addr-c3s S. UIST, N. i12Np, r_ GIRARll, W. YAFLK.
Applicant Rangc-1'nw-nship-ScrUvn: 43 - 25 - 24 PARC El.(S): (tirst 20)
),,fin 1 tiwcitzcr (on,lttwns Mailyd: 35241.0401 35241.0403 35241 0403
Huo17.anc 140
,92~) I3uonc .'+v , 1 a'aier Snurcr Publir
til'tlK.ANE. WA 99202-
Seti er 5ourrc
Schuol Dist 81
Firr nist 1
Ptiunr Uist
nwner
WA STA'it DCPT OF"Tft.AVSPUIt'I'11TIUN
2714 N. NIny!'air St Survcynr
SNOKAVF. WA 942117-2051
fl:ivid Be11o
11114:1,x i`il)I Z?-;-l?~r,
SPOKANL• COl71VTY ENGINEEI2S
11126 W. Broadway
SPOKANI:, WA 99260-
1'hon4 (50914 77 -3Wi(.i
Buiiding Ph: 477- Y,7.5 t'l:,iuun, Yiti -477-220 Contact FRANCIS SHAW`
Dute Subruitteci Description InitiAls
L•ng Nced Technically Cumplcte Eng Na-ci iiarvard ltci hlitiption
I:ng hccd Urainagc f'tans Lng Nccc! T'raffic Analysis Eng Nrrd Utlvr
C.ng Agree Pay FeLs ftececved ['ng Final Plut t-rxs Complcied
Copy to Accountirtg
C:ng Agsrc Prionty E=res Iteceived 11 'I-I9!1&00U Erig Prclim Piat Fers Compietccl
, Notice to Pubtic / Noticr tu Pubtic ~ I 3 d b C'orttpletcKi - or Nreds ta be signed
[3k:ti1g1l Ife~iann I;jtv~, rln-(!ulj
7-nc yuun ies tar
' :1rwnagr itrm w-alculatcd
{ icanng Uatc Ucctswti App DLn C'itnLj Applcl Bk'c-
Appcalcd to dCC [ecisian App i)en Cond Appld Court
Appealyd tuCaurt Iecissun Arp Dtn C'onci Appid
Sturril>cJ Mytars to Secmtary (Sandy)
.
, St:%,,iprd ?08 [ ot Plar.c tr 5_:rc?ar,(Sar};1~ )
_ J
t1rojcii5catu, Arif.e ENGIN EER'S REVIEW SHEET ~
As Built Plans Rrccivcii Rezone File ZE-0032-00 'M
Road Plans Appruvcd Companirm Fiias-
NLv. ~-1`-`~.~ M v18f#: ttelnted Fi1rs:
tirnring: Building Dept
1'cchnirai R,cview: 121I s/:l)tl0 t: l5
I . : }larvard Rd Plan
1'rcliminnry Rcview: 1'ypc: j -
_ l.arge Lat Bidg. Square Feet
Uate Iteceived: 12rQ4r20()0 '
. No. Lots: 3 No. Acres: 0_44
Project Name CtR-7 TO B-Z PA.RKLrtG LOT 34 SY WSDOT
_
Silr Addrrss S. 01ST. N. 02ND, E. I~IRARD. W. f'ARK,
Applicant itangr-Township-SCCUUn: 43 - 2.5 -?4 P4RCEL4S): (first 20)
1otrr7 T SwCivrr f'rmditiuns N9siled: 35241.0401 352410402 35241 0443
F•looi Zone No
.1929 E. Daunr :1ti• . l WatcrSourc.r Pubiic
SP()KANE. WA 99202- v
Scwcr Sourcc
f'linnc (5{191 ??5-841J
tichaol Dist 81
f~Irr [Tist 1
Phone Uist
C)wncr
WA STATE 1')EPT QF TRANSYaR7'A'I'ION
27142$24 N. Mayfair St Snrvevor
SPOKAT`'E. WA 99207-2051 '
DavidC3crio
f'}l, mr 1 4; (i+)?:-n??r, SP0K1NECOUNTY[:NCiINEE12.S
1026 W. 13roadwav
SPOKatv'E. WA 99260-
E''tx+nc
t3uild+ni; Ph •:~'13h1; ,!'Ia~nin~ i'i; 4,7-2205 i_'unt~ct I R:;P.t_lti ti}i.\1k"
Date Submiited Description InitiAls
E:ng Nccd Tcchnically Complctc Eng Nerd Narvard RD Mitigatian
Fng Necd OrainAge Plwns F-ng Nced TraCFic Anntysis Eng Nerd Othcr
Fng Agrec Pav Fces Wxcived Eng Final Plst Fcrs Campleteci
i~ng Agrre Prinntv Frrx ftet~eivetl I 1,?9~2UU(? Eng t'rchm Piat Foes Completed Copy to Accounting
Notice tn Public ~ Nutire to Yublic # 1 3 4 6 Corrtplrttd - or Nrcds to be signed
( k~ti;~n Ch ~ i:3tiun C.iteti i In-c"h:t 1
/ .
n yuanties sur
drainage item caIculutea
I fraring Dzte [?exisian App Ik.n Cond Appld RCC
.41peaIe.i ►t, E3C;C Ik-cision App Dcn C.'cind Appld Caurt
Appcalcd to C:ourt Uecision App Dcn Cand Appld
Stampcd Mylars to Sccrctary (Sundy)
>t:,rtqfrd ?~1R 1 ot F'lans :u tiritclan !'Candv)
4
-b
.
1;, l STAFF REPORT TO THE HEARING EXAMINER
FILE ZE-32-00
SPOIWSZE COUI%UY DIVISION OF PLANNING
HEARING DATE February 14, 2001 @ 10 30 a m FILE # ZE-32-00
PROJECT PLANNER Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Zone reclassification of approximately 19, 015 35 square feet from
Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Community Business (B-2) for the development of a private
parking lot for Washington State Department of Transportation office
Prolect Data
Project Location The subject property is generally located at the
southwest corner of the intersection of Appleway
Boulevard and Park Road in the NE 1/4 of Section
24, Township 25 N, Range 43 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington
Parcel Number(s) 35241 0401, 35241 0402, 35241 0403
Applicant John T Sweitzer
3929 E Boone, Ste 1
Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 325-2021
Comprehensive Plan Designation Urban
Zoning Urban Residential-7 (UR-7)
Existing Land Use Vacant and undeveloped
Surroundinq Zoning and Land Uses
• North Zoning to the north of the site is Regional Business
(6-3) established in 1991, previously classified as
Commercial (C) in 1954 (ZE-400-54) Land use
consists of an existing office building, an automobile
sales lot and typical commercial uses located along
the Sprague Avenue corridor
• South Zoning to the south of the site is Urban Residential-7
(UR-7) established in 1991, previously classified as
Residential Mobile Home Zone (RMH) in 1970 (ZE-
78-70) Land use to the south of the site consists of
single family residential uses
• East Zoning to the east of the site is Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) estabiished in 1991, previously classified as
Multi-Family Suburban (MFS) in 1959 Land use to
the east of the site consists of a manufactured home
park and undeveloped land
• West Zoning to the west of the site is Urban Residential-7
ZE-32-00
Staff Report - February 14 2001 Heanng
1 of 6
>
AL
(UR-7) established in 1991 (ZE-78-70), previously
classified as Residential Mobile Home Zone (RMH) in
1970 (ZE-78-70) Land use to the westbf the site
consists of vacant, undeveloped land
Recent land use actions in surrounding Recent land use actions in the vicinity of the subJect
area site include
ZE-26-00, Zone reclassification from UR-3 5 to B-3 to
expand an existing automobile sales and service
facility for property located directly northeast of the
site at the NE corner of the intersection of Park Road
and Appleway Boulevard, approved by the Hearing
Examiner on February 2, 2001
ZE-56-94, Zone reclassification from General
Agricultural (GA) to Urban Residential-22 (UR-22) for
an assisted care facility for property located
southeast of the site at the NE c&ner of the
intersection of 8`hAve and Park Road, approved by
the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 26,
1995
ZE-47-91, Zone reclassification from UR-3 5 to UR-
22 for the development of a retirement community for
property located southeast of the site along Park
Road, approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee
on November 21, 1991
Land Division Status The subject property consists of Lots 1,3, 4 and 4,
Block 4 of Midway Addition
Shoreline Designation Not applicable
Water Purveyor East Spokane County Water District #1
Sewage Disposal- The applicant is not proposing to connect to the
County Sewer System
Fire District # Spokane County Fire Protection District #1
Nearest Arterial and Distance The site is located adjacent to both Park Road and
Appleway Boulevard, which are designated as
Principal Artenals by the Spokane County Artenal
Road Plan
Neighborhood Assoaation None known
• This proposal is located inside the Interim Urban Growth Area (IUGA)
• This proposal is located inside the Public Transportation Benefit Area (PTBA)
GMA/Critical Areas
Aquifer Recharge Area The subject property is located within the
Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) and the
Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA) Overlay Zone
Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas The subject property is located within
mile of a non-point species location as
ZE-32-00
Staff Report - February 14, 2001 Heanng
2 of 6
► ~
identified on Spokane County Critical Areas
Maps The Division of Planning, in
consultation with the Washington State
Department of Fish & Wildlife, determined
that a habitat management pian was not
required for the proposed land-use action
Floodplain ~ The site is not located within a flood plain
Geologically Hazardous Areas None illustrated on the Spokane County
Crrtical Area Maps
Wetlands None illustrated on the Spokane County
Critical Area Maps
SEPA
A Determination of Nonsignificance was issued for the proposal on January 26, 2001, with a
comment period ending on February 12, 2001
Noticinq
Published The proposal was published in the Legal Notice section of the Spokesman Review on
January 26, 2001
The deadline for notifying property owners/taxpayers within 400 feet of the proposal was January
29, 2001
Site Posting Deadline The deadline for posting public notice on the site was January 29, 2001
1724 Comaliance Dates
Application Accepted November 28, 2000
Technicaliy Complete / Determination of Completeness issued December 14, 2000
Date Notice of Decision is due Apnl 13, 2001
ReviewinQ Aqencies
12 agencies were notified on December 4, 2000, and January 18, 2001 Comments were due on December
14, 2000, and January 31, 2001
Agencies Notified Response Date Agencies Notified Response Date Recerved Recerved Received Received
Spokane County Division Yes 1/26/01 Spokane Regionai Yes 1/26101
of Engineering, Health District
Transportation
Spokane County Division Yes 12/10/00 East Spokane Water No
of Engineering, District No 1
Development Services
Spokane County Division Yes 2/6/01 Spokane County Fire Yes 1/13/01
of Utilities Protection District No 1
Spokane County No Washington State No
Stormwater Utility Department of Fish &
Wildlife
Spokane County Division Yes 1/22/01 Spokane County Air Yes 1/19/01
of Building & Code Pollution Control
Enforcement Authority
Spokane Transit Authority ~ No ~ School District No 81 ~ No ~
AQencv Comments
Agency comments received are in the form of recommended conditions of approval
ZE-32-00
Staff Report - February 14, 2001 Hearing
3of6
do ~ J
Public Comments
No public comments have been received for the proposed land use action
Descriqtion of the Site
The subJect site is approximately 19,015 35 square feet in size and is currently vacant and undeveloped
The site is located adjacent to both Park Road and Appieway Boulevard Access to the site is from
Appleway Boulevard Appleway Boulevard is a recently constructed four (4) lane artenal with curbs and
sidewalks Surrounding land uses include single family residences, a manufactured home park, an
automobile dealership and an office building
BackQround
The existing zoning of the subJect property is Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) established in 1991, and
previously classified as Residential Mobile Home Zone (RMH) in 1970 (ZE-78-70) The application for the
proposal was submitted to the Division of Planning on November 28, 2000 A technical review meeting was
held on December 14, 2000 The application was determined to be technically complete on December 14,
2000 The Notice of Application was mailed on December 20, 2000, with a 14-day comment period ending
on January 3, 2001
In March of 2000, the applicant requested the Division of Planning issue a wntten interpretation addressing
the ability to use the subject property as a parking lot for an office building located to north of Appleway
Boulevard A written interpretation (AIE-4-00) was issued on October 16, 2000, concluding that the existing
Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone and Section 14 802 060(1) of the Zoning Code do not allow off-street
parking areas that are not located on the same site as the use for which the parking is required The
interpretation did recommend that the applicant seek a zone reciassification to the proposed Community
Business (B-2) zone for the development a pnvate parking lot
Staff Analvsis
Project Description The proposed proJect consists of a zone reclassification from Urban Residential-7
(UR-7) to Community Business (B-2) for a private parking lot The proposed pnvate parking lot is to serve
the existing Washington State Department of Transportation business office located at the northwest corner
of the intersection of Park Road and Appleway Boulevard
Comprehensive Plan
The subject property is focated within the Urban category of the Comprehensive Plan The Urban category
is intended to provide the opportunity for the development of a"citylike" environment with intensive
residentiai uses and public facilities and services Detailed Definrtion B states "Since urban areas will be the
most intensely developed of all the categories, it is primarily a residential category of single family two family
and multifamily along with neighborhood commercial and light industnal uses The more intensive land uses
will be located near the heavily traveled streets, while the least intensive residential uses will be isolated
from the noise and heavy traffic The subJect property is located adJacent to two designated Pnncipal
Arterials Detailed Definition D states "Due to the vanety and mix of land uses and activities found in the
Urban category, few land use activities would be inappropriate " Many uses may require screening or other
standards to make them compatible with one another " Mining, major commercial users, heavy industrial
uses, and intensive farming would not be compatible within Urban areas
Goals, ObJectives and Decision Guidelines within the Urban category that are applicable to the proposed
zone reclassification include Decision Guidelines 1 5 1, 1 5 2 which recommend the use of buffering and/or
landscaping between existing and proposed uses to minimize potential impacts Objective 1 5 e and
ZE-32-00
Staff Report - February 14 2001 Heanng
4of6
Decision Guideline 1 5 8 recommends that when a neighborhood experiences pressure for a change in
character that such change shall be permitted upon appropriate review and the review will consider the
impact of the proposed development upon the existing development
The site plan of record illustrates a Type I landscaping stnp, 5 feet in width, to be installed along the south
and west property lines of the site which may provide a buffer from the proposed use to the single family
residences located directly south of the site
The Goals, ObJectives and Decision Guidelines of the Urban category are not generaliy supportive of
community business uses, and Section 14 626 100 of the Zoning Code states that the purpose and intent of
the proposed Community Business (B-2) zone is to implement the Major Commercial category of the
Comprehensive Plan
The subject property is located directly south of an area designated as MaJor Commercial, and the
Transition Area definition of the Comprehensive Plan may apply The Transition Area definition recognizes
that a specific proposal may cross or be adjacent the boundary of another land use designation and may
allow development complying with either land use map category without a Comprehensive Pian
Amendment, dependent upon the decision maker's site specific approval
Zoning
The purpose and intent of the proposed Community Business (B-2) zone is to provide for the establishment
of commercial centers and to implement the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan The
Community Business (B-2) zone is intended to implement Any Community Business (B-2) zoned area
should not be larger than twenty acres in size with frontage on a minor arterial or higher classification not
exceeding fourteen hundred (1400) feet It is intended that these community shopping facilities be provided,
wherever possible, in one business island centrally located in the trade area or in business clusters rather
than in ribbon development along artenals
The subject site is located adjacent to two designated Principal Arterials and is consistent the maximum size
and frontage recommendations of the proposed Community Business (B-2) zone The subject site generally
meets the minimum lot area and frontage requirements of Section 14 626 310
Site Plan
The site plan of record iliustrates a proposed 35 space private parking lot with required landscaping The
site is to be paved and will have one access point along Appleway Boulevard
Site Plan Data
Proposed Req ui red/Al lowed
Landscaping
Appleway Boulevard 5' Type III 5' Type III
Park Road 5' Type III 5' Type III
Internal Property lines 20' Type I 20' Type I
Parking 35 spaces No requirement
Lot size 19, 015 35 sq ft 10, 000 sq ft minimum
Lot depth 280 feet 140 feet
Frontage 280 feet 100 feet minimum
The proposed site plan of record generally meets the minimum development standards of the proposed
Community Business (B-2) zone, with the exception of the required 20-foot wide landscaping strip along the
ZE-32-00
Staff Report - February 14 2001 Heanng
5of6
A I q
west and south property lines Section 14 806 080 of the Zoning Code allows for the administrative
modification of the landscaping requirements based upon the applicant's demonstration that landscaping
requirements would result in more than 15% of the site area being landscaped
Changed Conditions
Section 14 402 020(2) of the Spokane County Zoning Code states that amendments to the Zoning Map may
occur when it is found that "Changes in economic, technological, or land use conditions has occurred to
warrant modification " Changed conditions in the area of the proposal may include the recent construction of
Appieway Boulevard, which is designated as a Principal Arterial by the Spokane County Artenal Road Plan
Staff Summarv
The proposed zone reclassification is generally inconsistent with the Goals, Objectives, and Decision
Guidelines of the Urban category, however the transition area definition of the Comprehensive Plan may be
applicable Changed conditions in the area of the site may also support the proposed action
Attachments
A Maps
• Vicinity Map
• Site Development Plan
• Comprehensive Plan
• Zoning
B Conditions of Approval
C Agency Comments
ZE-32-00
Staff Report - February 14 2001 Heanng
6 of 6
ATTACHMENT A
MAPS
VICINITY MAP
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
COMPREHENSNE PLAN MAP
ZONING MAP
I 4
ZE-32-00
V'icinity Nlap f ~
~
h ~
Centennjal Mlo~'dle ~
0
cc, A
~ ~ ~ o groadw av ~
~ ~
- w ~ a
.
. c~
~ ~
~
13 c, ,Mngto ~
~ w t
S
de ~
Sprag,.,ue
Applewav ~ A ~
le way
~ 41b
4 ~
~
~ ~ imrr BFemerfaly ,
~
oiib
~
- ~ ~
q~
~ 19
ua 24g iDib
Ulb
12.1b ~
oa -
~ .
833 k ir+~'~dedy 12/04/00 M~P
f scale 1 a~
h 60±0o FIRST AVENUE
'
SACX OF ~ M -fACE OF C11RB CEMENT CONRM APPROACH CENTER
SIpE+NAUf CFH1fNT CONCRt1F UNE lOG1ED AS AMR070MATUY
UDEWALX \ C 60461, MATdI DOSIINO APPROACN I~~ NpE B PREGIST OKYINEU AT
1 ~ A OF S~ E1MM~ STA,d1+ 50 IN CENTE! Of SWAtF TOP ~
~
I OF MIfT SFIAII BE B FkOM 1NE BOTTOM
OF SHAIE
0
w D
~ ~ 15' L~15' '4 " ~
~
1 c t a I u,~ ~
2 35 ~ ~ 32 ~ 30 qy 28 27 26 4 ~ i~ ~
• ~
~6 1 3 2S 24 23 CFMEM CONCRETE >
21 20 19 ~ rsIotwxx su <
a , MfCAST CDAEWT CONCMKM 62 . 30 ro 72 s RT _ rn
BL W"t ana
s -r..
t i 6 Z
iet-J e7 e 910 11 12 ia u u x~ I"z it„ C
N ,e 18 1e ~ `FAce OF cuze m
o » ~N ~
° AACK OF ~ T
O + S WIDE UN SIOEWALX
DSGIPING W
A CURSINd STRIP All iME WAY AROUND EDGE OF R1GMT OF WAY ~ N
IROrERTY CORNER ~ Al1FY ~ 62+ 30 70 10135 Ri ~ 1 •
~ AA 60+00 131 Sl Rr ~ O
~ PLAN LAYO UT VI EW ~ o
~
d
, . ,
0 20 ao cuRe uNo sioEwux
SCaLE tN FEEr -~INSTALIED BY COUNIY
-►s ~
v ,
1 ~f
0.52%
~iwGA-not,i smu,
n ss' o o~-~ i~rAnoN sYSr~+,
SEE SHEEf 2 SEE SHEU 1 BALK OF StOEWAII(
SECTION B-6
NTS IUMIhWRES SEE IfGEND AND
GHJERAI NOlES TMIS SMfFf
CU0.9 SIDPNILLK AND SWAIE
TO EE INSTALLID BY COUPf1Y IANDSCAPIMG SEE
~ LfGB40 iH15 SHEET
~ ~BUMBER CURB 1%
G~i \ ~ty J
D 73' CL A ACP.~~ IRRIGATION SYSTEM ~
050 CSBC SEE SHEET 2
SECTION A-A "~"~'~'A CURB AROUND
BOTH SIDES OF PIANTING
NI5
~ ~ •
ZE-32-00
Comprehensive land Use Plan
I'
~
AUJI
HIM F-E
- ~
U I -
Kea~~X -
I I -
I
3 L -
~ r
I
rF1 n ~
- - =ti
_ - - _ - - l
rHo-
~ ~ ~ ~ •
u
1 q-~'- -
_1
eft
~ I
~ I
~ I
I
IRT 11 1 1 1 1 1111 11 11111111 111 IH
I
I-~ i.R.
I~ E.I. I IEI 11 I
I 9
I
L-A111 11114=_11 EIIH I I
[L_E_ ~_Ufi liff[ti I I I III I
nl
LLLL~ I I I I I I III 111HII ll-
i ~ 0 CE
Scale 1 inch - 833 ft (rounded) 12/04/00 Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Subject Property within IUGA AAmA 4 Subject Property within UTA
Subject Property within PSSA Subject Property witfiin ASA
r ` O
ZE-32-00
Existing Zoning
I MZ 319 53 T i I 2131 58 r-I
I 3 526 59 R 8 244
(-3 480 56 I i~ 67 8 C
~
I - 5S 6
18
~
I 1323141 I 27 86
~
I 3141 I ~
13
12 33 55C I 2 7156
~ - --7'pmg=
141 B-~ ~p - - - - B 31 141 I - - - - - ~ - - I, D 810 4 ~
I p
B~ ~ -8 4 B 3 4b 54
B~ 8 00 I ~ 5
E
1 ' ~
• ~ I
R 7 8 0 B, 3 48 S
UR221659
R~ 107,~ R'7 FB'R ~
R7 8 0 JR 7 8 0 ~
8
R7 8 0 8-70~I /R351B59
iR ~7 a u R 7 18 70
~ y
uA-22 107 as ~
-:~Rj 8 I
.
.
~ F UR-7 7 78 0 ~ -7 7 7 '
f8T
-7 78 r-
UR 7 7 U r I I J~ U 7787 ` I UR224791C
~ I 19
R 7 R77 7 ~
I~ I I
7 78
U- 7 UR-7 8 7
6Ti!" , I UR 22 56 94C
R•7 7 U R 7 171 I
i
U 7 0 R'~ 171 UR 7 78 70
` Yd,' I u 7 78 U _7 717 I UR 8 516 59
U 7 7 I
1 , .
F7W?ra 7 -8 ~
Sc;ale 1 indi - 500 k(rounded) 12/04/00 Ewsting Znrong
. ~
ATTACHMENT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
a
~ RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR
ZE-32-00
„ ~
~ ~ ~ DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOIW\~E COUNTY
.
1 All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant," which
term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns and successors
2 The zone change applies to the following real property Lots 1, 2, 4 and 4, Block 4 of
Midway Addition
3 The proposal shall comply with the Community Business (B-2) zone and all applicable
chapters of the Zoning Code, as amended
4 The applicant shall develop the subject property generally in accordance with the concept
presented to the Hearing Examiner Variations, when approved by the Director of the
Division of Planning/designee, may be permitted, mcludmg but not limited to building
location, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations
must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Code, and the
original intent of the development plans shall be maintained
5 Approval is required from the Director of the Division of Planning/designee of a specific
lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building
permit
6 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property
boundary
7 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for the maintenance
acceptable to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee shall be submitted with a
performance bond or other suitable guarantee for the project prior to release of any
building permits Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at
access points is not obscured or impaired
8 The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title
Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions
imposed as a result of approval of a land use action This Title Notice shali serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question The Title
Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shail
only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Planning The Titie Notice shall
ZE-32-00 February 14, 2001 Public Heanng
Oivision of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
S
generally provide as follows
The parcel of property legally described as is the subject of a land use
action by a Spokane County Hearing Examiner on February 14, 2001, imposing a
variety of special development conditions File No ZE-32-00 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning
ZE-32-00 February 14 2001 Public Heanng
Division of Planning Recommended Conditions of Approval
7
ATTACHMENT C
AGENCY COMMENTS
JAN-19-01 01 42AM FRC41-SCAPCA 094TT6928 T-793 P 03104 F-737
~UNTY
~~AR~~~ ~~~~~N
i-M P C1 v< A IV ~ ~~NTROL AV 1 ~ORn
WEST 1i01 C4tL¢GL SUIT€ 403 * 3PoKAN E wA 992fl 1 +(50) 477-4727 Fax (M) 4 7 7-028
Date Januarv 19. 2001
To Francme Shaw, Senior Rlanner
§pokane Coun#y Divisian of Planninq
1026 W Broadway Avenue
~pvkane,.WA 99260
Frorn Ron Edgar Ghief of Technacai Senrices
RE SCAPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR
Fike No ?!E~2-00
Propanent { Ptoject Name 2one reclassif'rcatian;'[2,015 39 sq ft fa B-2 nnvate varking lat1UVSDT
p GeneraC Comrrrents on Februarv 14. 2001 It 1030 a m
The fol4owing i5 a lrst of concernslissues thai rnay rteed #.o be addressed for thss project as determmed from
informatian received riy this affice The list is provided as a bnef summary of genera1 requirements and daes not
relieve the propanen# frorr► mee#ing a1i loca1, state, andlor federal regulabons For adddMOnaI infornnation afi
cianfication, ocnmai SCAPCA at (509) 477-4727 Capies of SCAPCA regula#ians are available for purchase jn
our vffir.e ior can be mewed and dowrrloaded from ~ lAvww scaoca arr{
Construction retated requiremen#s
• DusL emissions duf-lng dernolton, construction and excava#ion projects must be can#ralled This may requife
the use of water sprays, tarps, spnnkiers, ar suspension of actnrity durmg +oertain weather condittons
•Measures must be taken ta svoid the depasiuon of dirt and rnud from unpaved surfaces onm paved surFaces
I#traclcing ar spil1s occur an paved surfaces, msasures must be tafcen immediately to clean these srarfaces
• Depns gB~erated es a result of thi~ project must be disposed of by mesns other than buming
# SCAPCA s#rongly recommends that al! #raveled sudaces (i e ingress, egress, park4ng areas, accass roads,
etc.) be paved and kepk clean #a mir~imi2e dust emissions
0 lf objecbonable adars result frvm this projec~ effec#ive cantrof aPParatus and measures must be taken #o
reduce odars to a minirraum
Additianal requiremerts
• A Notace of Constcucton and App1,catian for Approval is reqwired to be s0mitted and approved by SCAPCA
priof m the construction, installaban, or esrabl3shment of an air polkutcvn source This includes emergency
generatcrs rated at 5D0 hp (375 kW) or higher natural gas heating equipment units rated at 4 MMBTI]/hr or
h4gher (,npu#), anci heahng equGpment units firied witn other #ue1s (e g diesel) rated a[ 1 NIMBTUIh~ (inpu#) or
nigher Cantw SCAPCA #or a Nawe of Canmction appGication
r A Notice of Intent must be submftd x~ ~CAPCA priar ta any detnoiitan praject or asbestos prajecr An
asbestos survey must be done ny an AHERA accredited buiIdmg inspec#nr prior to the dernohtian or
renovation of buildings ro det+etmina I asbestos-conEainmg rnateria1 is present at the site Contact 5CAPCA
tqr a Notice of lnt,ent appiicaUan
u %fvWs%SEPAvGENERA►t COtvnMEWS FORM-dvc
Shaw, Francine
rT
From Forry, Jeff
Sent Monday, January 22, 2001 7 38 AM
To Shaw, Francine
Subject Landuse action - ZE-32-00 Rezone to B-2 for pnvate parking lot
A grading permit is required to improve the proposed parking lot
jeff Fomj
Senior Building Technictnri
Spokane CounhJ Public Works
Divtsion of Buildzng & Code Enforcement
(509)477-7103
1
' l
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
~
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO Spokane County Planning Department
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE January 26, 2001
PROJECT UR-7 TO B-2 PARKING LOT 34 SP WSDOT
FILE # ZE-0032-001()
Hearing 02/14/2001 @ 10 30
Review Date @
Sponsor/Applicant JOHN T SWEITZER
Section Township Range 24-25-43
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
Technical Review Date (12/14/2000 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Condttions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
z - I y ~ SC,
•a
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer
2 Appiicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans
3 A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shali receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit
4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shali be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
CC Applicant JOHN T SwEITZER
Enqineer/Surveyor
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
Page 2
02/14j2001 Hearing / Review / 12/14I2000 TR
ZE-0032-00
5 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Appleway Boulevard
6 Access to Park Road shall be prohibited unti{ such time as authorized by the Spokane County
Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposa!
8 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and ather applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, uniess otherwise approved by the County Engineer
9 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer Ail work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
10 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards
11 The applicant shouid be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
END
e
i ~
To Francine Shaw (Division of Planning)
CC
From Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date Tuesday, February 06, 2001
Subject ZE-0032-00 Stage Hearing Examiner Phase
7418 E 1st
SS09A The dedication shall state Public sewers shall be constructed to provide for the connection of
each parcel to the County's system of sewerage Uses on properties within the proJect shall be
required to connect to the sewer and pay applicabie charges per the County Sewer
Ordinance Sewer connection permits shall be required
SS096 The dedication shall state A public sewer system will be made available for the plat, and
individual services will be provided to each lot prior to sale Use of individual on-site disposal
systems shall not be authorized
SS12A Applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities "under separate cover",
only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and speafications for the public sewer
connections and facilities for review and approval Commercial developments shall submit
historical and or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal
SS12E Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the finalv-ation of
the project
WS01 Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water
System Plan for Spokane County, as amended
s ~
~ OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
~
"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" ZONE
TO Spokane County Planning Department ~
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
~
DATE January 26, 2001
PROJECT UR-7 TO B-2 PARKING LOT 34 SP WSDOT
FI LE # ZE-0032-UO/
Hearing 02114/2001 @ 10 30
Review Date @
Sponsor/Applicant JOHN T SWEITZER
Section Township Range 24-25-43
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
Technical Review Date (12/14/2000 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
Prior to issuance of a building permit or at the request of the County Engineer in conjunction
with a County Road ProjectlRoad Improvement District, whichever comes first
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans
3 A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and all other standards and laws that are applicable Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit
4 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surFacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the proJect which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
CC Apolicant JOHN T SWEITZER
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
i::* 0 ,
i Page 2
02/14/2001 Hearing / Review / 12/14/2000 TR
zE-0032-00
5 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Appleway Boulevard
6 Access to Park Road shall be prohibited until such time as authorized by the Spokane County
Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
8 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
9 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
10 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards
11 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the appiicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
END
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230( -1j
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCF
FILE NUMBER: ZE-32-00
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Zone Reclassif ication of approximately 19,015.3 5 sqtiare
feet of land from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Community Business (13-2) far the cievclop►11ent
of a private parking lot for the Washington State Departmerit ofTran~portation.
PARCEL NOS.: 35241.0401, 35241.0402, 35421.0403
HEARING DATE AND TIME: February 14, 2001 at 10: 3 ) 0 a.i11.
APPLICANT: WA State Department of Transro~rtation, 2824 N. ;NIa} 1air, 5~~~)ka:lc. W:l U
509/324-6276
PROJECT CONTACT: John Sweitzer, 3929 E. Boone, Suite 1, Spokane, WA; 509/325-8514
LUCATION OF PROPOSAL: East 7406-7418 First Avenue, which is generally located at the
southwest carner of the intersection of First Avenue/Appleway Boulevard and Park Road in the
NE '/a of Section 24, Township 25 N., Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNINC J
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it Joc~ nuc havc
probable significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review oi' a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agenctil. This infor►»ati011
is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-1 1-340(2); the lead agellCy Nvill not act on tliis proposal tor at Ieast
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be suhmittecl no later
than 5:00 p.m., February 12, 2001, if the~• .~re intended toatter the UI~S. :~II cc,ninicrits shc►ul(l I~~~
sent to thc cr,ntact ~~crson listed hel~~ic. ~
ItESYUNSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Francine Shaw Title: Senior Planner
Spokane County Division of P(anning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
Spokane, WA 992!60 0220 (509) 477-7 0
.
~
DATE ISSUED: January 26, 2001 SIGNATURE:
CbMMIIVIS REGARDING IIWIRONMFNTTAI. CONCE2NS ARE UJFIJCOME AT THE G.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKAN f.
C4UNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING, lst Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal
deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of ihe decision to approve or disapprove the prcject.
This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objectionl-..
Contaci the Division of Planning to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA app~~.i!
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (t )1} 111pi'l)
2. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Transpnrtation Engineering; Scott Engelh,ir,i
3. Spakane Caunty Division of Engineering, Develorment Servicer: Bill } iemmin~,~
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red 5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Nolderby
7. Spokane County Division of Building and Code EntOrce,>>e►;t. Jcfl- for►
8. 5pokane County Air Pollution Control Authoriry, i I1:11c1:
9. WA State Boundary Review Board; St,san Winch,:i 1
10. Fire Protection District No. 1
11. East Spokane Water District No. 1
J
.
. ~ . . RECF= D
. REI;W V
~SWE co; My
- ~ L
S P O K A N ~ _ ~i ~T ik~~ ` C7 C4~c&AE C%NVIE~
D(VISION nF: PLANMNG A DIVISICIN OF THE I'UBLIC W()RKS DEPAR7'MENT
MICHAEL V. NE:EDHAM, DIRFCPOR GARY OBERG, DIRF.C]'UR
~~vED
R~G
~ p,N 18 2V
l c): SEoka»e C:ounty Division ut'Enginc;cri►ig & ttoads; 5cuu Engc:lliard, C/u Sand\
Kimball
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads: Biil ite~l~min~~ti
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Caunty Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sini-,
Spokane Regianal Health District; Steve Holderh%
Spoka»e County Uivision of Building & Code Enl0rcel>>cnt; .k.•f 1 l;', I %
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authorin•, Chuck Stuclcr
Spokane Transit Autliority
Spokane Countv Fire Protection nistrict No. 1
East Spokane No. 1
1
FROM: Francine Shaw, Senior Planner
UATE: January 18, 2001
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of February 14, 2001 at 10:3U a.m.
FILE NO: ZE-32-00
BRIEF DFSCRIPTION: Rezone of approximately 19,015.35 square fc~:t ot ►.,trld
from UR-7 to B-2 for the development of a private parking lot for the
Washington State Department of Transportation.
S-T-R: 24-25-43
PARCEL NO.: 35241.0401, .0402, .0403
APPLICANT: John Sweitzer for WA State UOT
Note that the application and maps were previausly circulatcd to yuur agency.
Please review and return any corli ments to me by January 31, 2001.
%Vc
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
I
102b W. BROADWAY 9 SPOKANL•, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
f HONE: (5(?9) 477-7200 • FAX: (.9) 977-'~?43 • TDD: (5t19) 177-7133
,
~
,f ► ,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEA.RING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON THE
LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS
Applicahon• File No ZE-32-00, zone reclassification of approximately 19,015 35 square feet of land
from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) to Commun.ity Business (B-2) for the development of a private parking
lot for the Washington State Department of Transportation
Parcel No's • 35241 0401, 35241 0402, 35421 0403
Hearing Date and Time February 14, 2001 @ 10 30 a m
Place Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington
Owner. Spokane County Engineers, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, 509/477-3600
Applicant WA State Dept of Transportation, 2824 N Mayfair, Spokane, WA 99207, 509/324-6276
Project Contaet. John Sweitzer, 3929 E Boone, Suite 1, Spokane, WA 99201, 509/325-8514
Address and Location East 7406 - 7418 First Avenue, wluch is generally located at the southwest
corner of the intersection of Fust Avenue/Appleway Boulevard and Park Road in the NE '/4 of Section
24, Township 25 N, Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Comprehensive Plan Urban (L) and in a transition area to the Major Commercial (C) category
Existing Zoning• Urban Residential-7 (UR-7)
Environmental Determination• A Deternunation of Nonsigruficance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Planning, as the lead agency on January 26, 2001 The comment period ends February 12,
2001
Related Permits Admirustrative Interpretation, File No AIE-4-00
Division of Planning Staff Francine Shaw, Senior Planner, (509) 477-7200
HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals• The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted in
Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294 All interested persons may testify at the public hearing, and
may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing The Heanng Examiner may limit
the time given to speakers A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged Any appeal of
the Hearing Examiner's decision vvill be based on the record established before the Hearing Examiner,
pu.rsuant to County Resolution Nos 96-0171 Environmental appeals will follow the same procedural
route as the underlying action All hearings will be conducted in facilrties which are accessible to
persons with physical disabilrties
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Planning, 1 S` Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W Broadway,
Spokane, WA 99260-0220, between 8 30 a m and 5 00 p m, weekdays, M-F, except holidays Copies
of documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-7200 Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Planning, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn Francine Shaw, File No ZE-32-
00 Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3rd Floor,
Public Works Building, 1026 W Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245
y A
~
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
f~►
Sp'l,w c""'`'" "ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" TR ZONE
TO Spokane County Building and Plan ing We, ~tent
FROM Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE December 13, 2000 v
PROJECT UR-7 TO B-2 PARKING LOT 34 SP WSDOT
FI LE # ZE-0032-00
Hearing Date @
Review Date
Sponsor/Applicant JOHN T SWEITZER
Section Township Range 24-25-43
Planner FRANCINE SHAW
Technical/Review Date (12/14/2000 @ 1 15)
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed
1 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County
Engineer
2 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer drainage and access
plans
3 A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final drainage plans,
a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 1999 Spokane County Standards for
Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County Guidelines for
Stormwater Management and ail other standards and laws that are applicable Final drainage
plans and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit
4 A parking pian and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane
County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in
accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County
Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles
5 The applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach to meet the existing pavement
on Appleway Boulevard
CC AppliCant JOHN T SWEITZER
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner E'RANCINE SHAW
~
° Page 2 •
Hearing / Review / 12/19/2000 TR
ZE-0032-00
6 Access to Park Road shall be prohibited until such time as authorized by the Spokane County
Engineer
7 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in
Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 99-0265 as amended and are applicable to
this proposal
8 All required improvements shalt conform to the current State of Washington Standard
Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable county standards and/or
adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the
date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer
9 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer
10 The applicant should be advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
affecting the applicants property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities The applicant should check with the applicable utilities and Spokane
County Engineer to determine whether the applicant or utility is responsible for adjustment or
relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work
11 The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of
Way per Spokane County Standards
END
. ,
Kimball, Sandy
From Hemmings, Bill
Sent Monday, December 11, 2000 2 00 PM
To Shaw, Francine
Cc Engelhard, Scott, Kimball, Sandy, Parry, Ed, Sims, Brenda, Darrell, Virginia, Baldwin, Greg,
Hohman, John, Little, Colleen
Subject ZE-32-00 - Spokane County
12-10-00
I received the above referenced proposal on December 5, 2000 No concept drainage plan is required for this proposal
The proposal is technically complete There is an error in the application Township 24 North should be Township 25
North I recommend using the standard road and drainage condition of approval
Bill Hemmings, PE
1
PAGE 1 08 26 19 05 DEC 2000
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
05801 1ST AV (START) 000 WEST END TO DEARBORN U 19 GRAVEL 18
1ST AV 030 DEARBORN RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
1ST AV (END) 150 CUSTER RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
05804 1ST AV (START) 000 EASTERN RD (END) U 19 PAVED 48
1ST AV 060 DYER RD (ONE WAY SOD U 19 PAVED 48
120 DOLLAR RD U 19 PAVED 48
190 DAVID ST U 19 PAVED 48
250 THIERMAN RD & APPLEW
05805 1ST AV 060 ELIZABETH RD U 19 PAVED 20
260 COLEMAN RD U 19 PAVED 20
370 GIRARD RD U 19 PAVED 20
05806 1ST AV (START) 000 SIPPLE RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
1ST AV 150 SARGENT RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
240 DALE RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
1 S T AV ( END ) 290 D I S HMA.N RD U 19 L I GHT B I TUM 22
05807 1ST AV 070 DISHMAN-MICA RD U 19 PAZTED 24
1 ST AV ( END ) 130 W I LLOW RD ( START ) U 19 PAVED 24
05808 15T AV (START) 000 WEST END TO FOX RD U 19 PAVED 22
1ST AV 060 FOX RD (START) U 19 PAVED 22
1ST AV (END) 120 UNION RD U 19 PAVED 22
05810 1ST AV (LIBERTY LK) ( 000 WARD RD (LIBERTY LK) R 09 PAVED 25
1ST AV 140 CLUBHOUSE RD R 09 PAVED 25
220 VIEW PL (END) R 09 PAVED 32
310 HILLVIEW RD R 09 PAVED 32
390 LAKERIDGE DR (END) R 09 PAVED 32
15T AV (END) 460 OVERLOOK RD(LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 32
05811 1ST AV (MEAD) (START 000 SHERIDAN ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
1ST AV 120 FREYA ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
190 MAIN ST (MEAD) (STAR U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
220 MARKET ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
1ST AV (END) 410 PEONE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
05812 1ST AV (FOUR LAKES)( 000 WEST END TO HEPPLE R R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
1ST AV 140 HEPPLE RD(START)(FOU R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
190 RING RD (FOUR LAKES) R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
210 ELECTRIC AV R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
290 ELENORE RD (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
310 SR-904 R 09 LIGHT BITUM 20
320 SPOKANE ST (END) & F R 09 GRAVEL 18
1ST AV (END) 390 CHENEY ST R 09 GRAVEL 18
05886 1ST AV (START) 000 HENRY RD R 09 PAVED 36
1ST AV 200 ASHTON ST (END) R 09 PAVED 36
1ST AV (END) 260 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 36
06016 1ST AV (START) 000 UNION RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
1ST AV 120 ROBIE RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
130 ROBIE RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 30
250 SR 27 (PINES) U 19 PAVED 22
1 ST AV ( END ) 360 HOUK RD ( START ) U 19 PAVED 22
05802 1ST AV (START) 000 CHRONICLE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
1 S T AV ( END ) 120 CARNAHA.N RD U 19 L I GHT B I TUM 30
05803 1ST AV (START) 000 HOWE ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
1ST AV (END) 100 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 18
05809 1ST AV (START) 000 PROGRESS RD U 19 PAVED 24
1ST AV (END) 120 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 30
06015 1ST AV (START) 000 WILLOW RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
1ST AV (END) 250 FARR RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
06224 1ST AV (START) 000 WEST END TO GREENACR U 19 PAVED 36
1ST AV (END) 040 GREENACRES RD U 19 PAVED 36
0 5 813 1 ST ST ( PLAZA ) ( S .A 000 MOORE AV (9ND ) R 09 GRAVEL 10
1ST ST (END) 060 FORSYTHE AV R 09 GRAVEL 10
PAGE 2 1 08 26 21 05 DEC 2000
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
17 Records Processed
PAGE 1 1 08 26 33 05 DEC 2000
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
05815 2ND AV (START) 000 HAVANA ST U 19 PAVED 18
2ND AV 120 DEARBORN RD U 19 PAVED 18
240 CUSTER RD U 19 PAVED 18
370 CHRONICLE RD U 19 PAVED 18
2ND AV (END) 500 CARNAHAN RD U 19 PAVED 18
05816 2ND AV (START) 000 DOLLAR RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
2ND AV 060 DAVID ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
120 THIERMAN ST U 19 PAVED 20
180 ELIZABETH RD U 19 PAVED 20
250 BR.ADLEY RD U 19 PAVED 20
310 DORA ST U 19 PAVED 20
370 COLEMAN RD U 19 PAVED 20
500 G I R.ARD RD U 19 PAVED 20
2ND AV (END) 620 PARK RD U 19 PAVED 20
05817 2ND AV (START) 000 PROGRESS RD U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AV 060 ST CHARLES RD (END) U 19 PAVED 36
120 SOMMER RD ( END ) U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AV (END) 180 NEWER RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
05819 2ND AV(START)(LIBERT 000 GARRY DR(START)(LIBE R 09 PAVED 36
2ND AV 120 2ND CT (LIBERTY LAKE R 09 PAVED 36
190 WRIGHT CT (LIBERTY L R 09 PAVED 36
250 MITCHELL CT (LIBERTY R 09 PAVED 36
310 MOLTER RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
450 DELLA ST (END) R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
520 CLUBHOUSE RD (LIBERT R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
2ND AV (END) 550 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
06046 2ND AV (MEAD) (START 000 FREYA ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
2ND AV 070 MAIN ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
2ND AV (END) 110 MARKET ST & PEONE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
06081 2ND AV (START) 000 SARGENT RD U 19 GR.AVEL 20
2ND AV 080 DALE RD (START) U 19 GRAVEL 20
2ND AV (END) 190 DISHMAN RD U 19 GRAVEL 20
06192 2ND AV (START) 000 BEST RD (START) U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV 210 ADAMS RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV (END) 280 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
06200 2ND AV (START) 000 WEST END TO BURNS RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV 050 BURNS RD (END) U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV (END) 100 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
05818 2ND AV (START) 000 MANIFOLD RD (START) U 19 GRAVEL 26
2ND AV (END) 080 LONG RD U 19 GRAVEL 26
05820 2ND AV (FOUR LAKES)( 000 ELECTRIC AV R 09 GRAVEL 14
2ND AV (END) 070 ELENORE RD R 09 GRAVEL 14
05821 2ND AV (FOUR LAKES)( 000 SPOKANE ST R 09 GRAVEL 14
2ND AV (END) 060 CHENEY ST R 09 GkAVEL 14
06017 2ND AV (STA.RT) 000 NEWER RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV (END) 060 SULLIVAN RD U 19 PAVED 40
06057 2ND AV (FOUR LAKES)( 000 CHENEY ST R 09 GRAVEL 10
2ND AV (END) 070 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 GR.AVEL 10
06058 2ND AV (START) 000 WEST END TO BOWDISH U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AV (END) 040 BOWDISH RD U 19 PAVED 36
06180 2ND AV (START) 000 MOEN ST U 19 PAVED 36
2ND AV (END) 040 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
06219 2ND AV (START) 000 BARKER RD U 19 PAVED 40
2ND AV (END) 130 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 40
05913 2ND CT (START) 000 SHERIDAN ST U 19 PAVED 30
2ND CT (END) 080 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 PAVED 30
06269 2ND CT (MEAD) (START 000 WILSON ST U 19 PAVED 36
2ND CT (END) 040 EAST END OV ROAD U 19 PAVED 36
06270 2ND CT (MEAD) (START 000 WEST END TO SHERIDAN U 19 PAVED 36
PAGE 2 OS 26 36 05 DEC 2000
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
2ND CT (END) 040 SHERIDAN ST U 19 PAVED 36
06924 2ND CT (LIBERTY LAKE 000 2ND AV R 09 PAVED 36
2ND CT (END) 030 NORTH END OF ROAD R 09 PAVED 36
05823 2ND ST (PLAZA) (STAR. 000 MOORE AV (PLAZA) (ST R 09 GR.AVEL 10
2ND ST 060 FORSYTHE AV (END) R 09 GRAVEL 10
2ND ST (END) 120 OLD SR-195 HY R 09 GR.AVEL 10
05822 2ND ST (FREEMAN) (ST 000 PROSPECT AV (END) R 09 GRAVEL 24
2ND ST (END) 040 SR-27 R 09 GRAVEL 24
22 Records Processed
PAGE 1 08 27 01 05 DEC 2000
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
03789 PARK BEACH RD(NEWMAN 000 SUTTON BAY RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 18
PARK BEACH RD (END) 180 EAST END OF ROAD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 18
03714 PARK RD (START) 000 SOUTH END TO 18TH AV U 19 GRAVEL 18
PARK RD 180 18TH AV (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 20
480 BEVERLY DR (START) U 17 LIGHT BITUM 20
550 EDGERTON RD (START) U 17 PAVED 22
590 12TH AV (END) U 17 PAVED 22
620 11TH AV (END) U 17 PAVED 22
680 lOTH AV (END) U 17 PAVED 22
740 9TH AV (END) U 17 PAVED 22
800 8TH AV U 16 PAVED 22
920 6TH AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22
990 5TH AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22
1 050 4TH AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22
1 120 3 RD AV ( END ) U 16 PAVED 22
1 180 2ND AV (END) U 16 PAVED 22
1 240 APPLEWAY BV U 16 PAVED 30
1 300 SPRAGUE AV U 14 PAVED 38
1 350 UPRR OVERPASS U 14 PAVED 38
1 410 SPEAR AV (START) U 14 PAVED 36
1 550 VALLEYWAY AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 36
1 800 BROADWAY AV U 14 PAVED 36
1 930 CATALDO AV (END) U 14 PAVED 36
2 110 SHA_RP AV (END ) U 14 PAITED 36
2 190 SINTO AV (START) U 14 PAVED 36
2 230 N1AXWELL AV ( START ) U 14 PAVED 36
2 310 MISSION AV U 14 PAVED 36
2 430 NOR.A AV U 14 PAVED 36
2 520 BALDWIN AV (START) U 14 PAVED 48
2 550 INDIANA AV (START) U 14 PAVED 48
2 620 BNSF CROSSING #53124 U 14 PAVED 48
2 640 BNSF CROSSING #53124 U 14 PAVED 48
2 670 SR 290 (TRENT) U 14 PAVED 48
2 800 MONTGOMERY AV (END) U 16 PORTLAND CEMENT 18
2 870 CARLISLE AV (END) U 16 PORTLAND CEMENT 18
2 990 MARIETTA AV U 16 PORTLAND CEMENT 18
3 050 BUCKEYE AV (START) U 16 PORTLAND CEMENT 18
3 150 UTAH AV U 16 PORTLAND CEMENT 18
3 180 UPRR CROSSING #53123 U 16 PORTLAND CEMENT 18
3 190 RUTTER AV U 16 PAVED 38
3 310 EUCLID AV U 19 PAVED 38
3 370 DALTON AV (START) U 19 PAVED 38
3 440 LIBERTY AV U 19 PAVED 38
3 500 BRIDGEPORT AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
3 560 GLASS AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
3 690 KIERNAN AV (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
PARK RD (END) 3 800 SOUTH RIVERWAY AV U 19 LIGHT BITUM 22
00286 BOONE AV (START) 000 LILY RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
BOONE AV 060 GIRARD RD (END) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
120 BOWMAN RD (START) U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
PARK RD (END) 180 EAST END OF ROAD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 20
03715 PARK ST (START) 000 MARSHALL AV (MARSHAL R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
PARK ST (END) 030 MARSHALL RD R 09 LIGHT BITUM 16
03716 PARKER RD (START) 000 JENNINGS RD R 09 GR.AVEL 26
PARKER RD 920 WATT RD (START) R 09 GRAVEL 26
1 660 DEPOT SPRINGS RD (EN R 09 GR.AVEL 26
2 190 CAMERON RD (START) R 09 GR.AVEL 26
3 210 BNSF CROSSfNG #33191 R 09 GRAVEL 26
PARKER RD (END) 3 340 SMYTHE RD R 09 GR.AVEL 26
PAGE 2 08 27 02 05 DEC 2000
Road# Road Names MPost Reference Descriptio Road Log Info
03717 PARKER RD (START) 000 BURROUGHS RD & SPOTT R 09 GRAVEL 24
PARKER RD 340 COUNTY PIT #82-09 R 09 GRAVEL 24
600 S POTTED RD ( START ) R 09 GR.AVEL 26
PARKER RD (END) 1 100 MONROE RD R 09 GRAVEL 20
03822 PARKHILL DR (START) 000 WEST END TO DAKOTA S U 19 PAVED 36
PARKHILL DR 090 DAKOTA ST (END) U 19 PAVED 36
180 CINCINNATI DR U 19 PAVED 40
260 HAMILTON CT (END) U 19 PAVED 40
420 COLUMBUS ST (START) U 19 PAVED 40
PARKHILL DR (END) 450 COLUMBUS ST (END) U 19 PAVED 40
03856 PARKSIDE DR (START) 000 SOUTH END TO GREENSI U 19 PAVED 36
PARKSIDE DR 020 GREENSIDE CT U 19 PAVED 36
PARKSIDE DR (END) 100 LANZCE CT (START) & U 19 PAVED 36
03811 PARKSMITH DR (START) 000 HAWTHORNE RD U 16 PAVED 26
PARKSMITH DR 087 BNSF CROSSING U 16 PAVED 26
370 GRAVES RD (END) U 16 PAVED 26
670 MARKET ST U 16 PAVED 26
730 BR 3617 OVERPASS FOR U 16 LIGHT BITUM 26
820 STONEMAN RD ( START ) U 19 L I GHT B I TUM 26
1 090 REGINA AV (MEAD) (ST U 19 LIGHT BITUM 26
PARKSMITH DR (END) 1 400 PEONE RD U 19 LIGHT BITUM 26
03718 PARKWAY RD (START) 000 AUBREY L WHITE PY U 19 PAVED 32
PARKWAY RD 100 LEMON LN (END) U 19 PAVED 32
PARKWAY RD (END) 140 SR-291 U 19 PAVED 30
03794 PARKWOOD CT (START) 000 SOUTH END TO FAIRTnT00 U 19 PAVED 26
PARKWOOD CT (END) 070 FAIRWOOD DR U 19 PAVED 26
11 Records Processed
, -
RECEVED
D E C 0 4 20
s P K A ~ 1E-- c o L-i ENORM
.DIVlS1C)N Of 1'I.ANN1NC MEMUltAN"stoy oE- THr: PUBLIc WORI:S UCPaKrMENT
MIcHnr:t_ v. NEmxAM, D[RLCPOR GARY ORERG D[RE"CTOR
DATE: Dccember 4, 2000
TO: Division uf Engineering and Roads - Transportation Engineering; Scott
Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball
Division oi`Engineering and Roads- Development Services; Bill I-Iemmings
Division of Utilities - Information Management; Jim Red
Division of Utilities - Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff E=orr-v
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority, Chuck Studer
Spokane Transit Authority; Christine Fueston
School District No. 81
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
East Spokane Water District No. 1
WA State Department of Fish & Wildlife, Kevin Robinette
FROM: Fraacine Shaw, Senior Planner 01 #17 V~
SUBJECT: ZE-32-00; Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7 (LiR-7) to
Community Business (B-2)
TEcttvlcAi. RE w MEETnvc
DECEMBER 14~1660 AT 1:15 P.M.
Division Of Planning lst Ftoor Conference Room 1 A
Please review the above applicaiion and use the attached TECHNICAL REVIEW MEETING I
FoRM for your comments. The Division of Planning encourages you to attend this
meeting. The sponsor and representative have also been invited to attend this meeting. I f
you cannot attend, please forward three (3) copies of your review comments on the
attached form to me for the meeting. The attached TECHNICAL REVIEw FORMS will be
given to the sponsor at the meeting and included in the Division of Planning file. Thanks
for your cooperation. If you have any questions about the application, please contact rne
at 477-7200.
NOTE: T6e Division of Planning wilt now be circulating cominents for SEPA Checklist at
the time of tec6nical review. This will be the only time you will be able to
comment regardiag the SEPA Checklist for t6is project.
Copy without enclosures: Spokane County/State of Washington, 2824 N. Mayfair Strett, Spokane, WA 99207
John T. Sweitzer, 3929 E. Boone Ave., Suite 1, Spokane, WA 99202, I
David A. Berto, Spokane County Division of Engineering
Laurie Carver
A;ttaehments: Technical Review Form, Project Application, Site Plan, Vicinity Map, SEPA Checklist
1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKMIE, WASHINC,'TON 99260-0220
PF 9tw(': (5(1)) 477-7'-'W . FAY• (1;(191 477-2247A •'j'fln- (Sflq) 4'7-7111
s
_
Spokane County
Division of Planning
Technical Review Meeting
Meeting Date and Time December 14, 2000 @ 1 15 p m
Project File No ZE-32-00
Project Location Generally located west of and adjacent to Park Road north of
and adjacent to Appleway Avenue in the N%2 of Section 24, Townslup 25 N,
Range 43 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Comprehensive Plan Urban
Project Descnption ZE-32-00, Zone Reclassification from Urban Residential-7
(LTR-7) to Commuruty Business (B-2)
Parcel No(s) 35241 0401, 0402, 0403
Owner Spokane County/State of Washington, 2824 N Mayfair Street, Spokane,
WA 99207
Applicant John T Sweitzer, 3929 E Boone Ave, Surte 1, Spokane, WA 99202
Project Planner Francine Shaw
~ Q.i~ ••60
!
/
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVIStON OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
RECEIVED
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION SPOKAIIJE C('UtqTy
PART I NO V 2 g 2000
OM5~~~ PLANNINO
A GENERAL INFORMATION
Legal Owner SDokane Countv/State of WashinLrton (Purchaser)
Mailing Address 2824 N Mavfau Street
City SDokane State WashinLrton Zip Code 99207-2051
Phone 509-324-6276 (Work) (Home) Fax
Applicant/Agent John T Swertzer
Mailing Address 3929 E Boone Avenue. Suite 1
City Spokane State Washinpton Zip Code 99202
Phone (509) 325-8514 (Woric) (509) 325-8514 (Home) Fax (509) 534-2021
IF APPLICANT IS NOT OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORI7ATION FOR APPLICANT TO SERVE AS
REPRESENTATIVE
Project/Proposal site area (acres or sq ft) 19,015 35 sf
Adjacent area owned or controlled (acres or sq ft) 18.410 sf Qarcel to the north
Assessor's parcel numbers of projecUproposal 35241 0401. 0402 and 0403
Assessor's parcel numbers of adjacent area owned or controlled 35241 0102 & 0103 to the north.
E 7421 First Avenue
Street address of proposal E 7406-7418 First Avenue
Existing zone classification(s) and date established Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) 1970 (78-70)
Existing use of property Vacant Dirt Parkmiz Lot
Proposed zoning Communitv Business (B-2) Zone
Comprehensive plan category "Urban" School Distnct District No 81
Water purveyor East SDokane Water Distnct # 1 Fire district Fue District # 1
Proposed use of property
Single family dwellings Duplexes Multifamily dwellings
Manufactured homes ( ) Business ( ) Industrial ( ) Mixed Use ( )
Other (X) - Describe A 34-space nrivate varkiniz lot
List previous planning division actions involving this property Rezone to UR-7 in 1970
B LEGAUZONE RECLASSIFICATION INFORMATION
Location of proposal SDokane Vallev, southwest corner of Park Road and First Avenue -
Section 24 Township 24 North Range 43 E W M
Name of public road(s) providmg access First Avenue on the north, Park Road on the East
Width of property fronting on pubiic road 2,3001f alonQ First Avenue on the north, 46 lf vlus radii along
Park Road on the east
P
•
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION APPLICATION PAGE 2 OF 4
Does the proposal have access to an arterial or planned arterial? Yes ( X) No
Name(s) of arterial roads First Avenue on the north, Park Road on the east
Legal description of property for each zone reclassification proposed
Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4, Block 4, Nlidwav Addition less rijzht of wav in Spokane Countv, State of Washmp-ton
Existing zone(s) UR-7 to proposed zone(s) B-2
for the following described property
Attach legal description stamped by land surveyor or provide below
r i .
If you do not hold trtle to the property, what is your interest in it? State of Washmeton Depariment of
Transvortation is purchasing the subject from Spokane Countv
What are the changed conditions of the area which you feel make this proposal warranted?
The new Snokane Vallev Couulet, eastbound section, a new four-lane arterial located adjacent and to the
north
What impact wiil the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? This nroiect will
help to buffer/screen the residential pronertv to the south from First Avenue Couplet Mmimal imnact
on propertv to the west
What factors support the zone reclassification? Consistent wrth previous zonmp- aaorovals, located at
the intersectio❑ of two arterials, buffers/protects adjacent propertv to south from the new couplet and
commercial development to the north, proposal is more typical of apartment/office accessorv use
What measures do you propose to mitigate your proposal's impact on surrounding land use?
Perimeter fencing and landscaping as shown on proposed site plan
L4NE RCCLASSIf ICATIuN Ai-PL1CATI0N PAGE 3 of 4
P11RT
This section of lhe application wiil provide ttie Division of B«ilding anci f'lanning staff willi wrilten
verification fhat 1he appiicant has had preliminary consultaUon willi 1he agencies identified
Results of lhe preliminary consuilcIlion shali be incorporated m the proposal before inal submiltal
co the Division
t f-ir3r__MnGs}I,L-UFiRE DisTrtICT
n This pronosal is within Fire Protecfion DisUict No ~
t3 Adequate arrangemenfs (have) (have not) been made to meet our needs in providing for an
adequate water system and facilities for ffre prokection purposes
C Recommended f{re flow r)3'i) , or unable to calculate now because use is not
definitive, and will be determined at time of bullding permlt apnlication
D Requirements lnclLide S v
Fire District Signaturel?tlle Dale
WU~~ ~ ~~LI:Y0R
n Satisiactory arrangements for ciomestlc water and fire flow,~ ements (have) (fiove not)
be e n maci e
6 Requirements/comments ~ .
~ Waler Distrtct Signaturell ille Date
COtJNTY E-N(CitJF_[2
A preliminary discussion has taken place and genera) requirements for ro nd dramage have
been discussed with the applicant
A Comments ~ .
Sic~naturelTiUe Date
CnUN7Y Ujll ITICS
A PreliminarY d(scusslon has tai<en piace and general renulrem or sLal of t1ifs propos-eil
(have) (have not) been satisfied I Iie ciesignated w~P-pirveyor for Ihis site ls
.
1` .
A Comments
Signaturerfitie Date
0 BEclQNAl_ I-IEALTH DIS7RiC7
n preliminary discusslon has tal<en place and general requ(rements for submlttai of t1lfs proposal
(have) (Iiave not) been satisfied
n ts
n Com me
L
S~jnaturE3/1 itle Date
S['Wr:R PURVFYnR
A nreliminary cliscLission has lc-ilcen place and general requirw emeat.s- he provision of publtc
sewer are undersloocl by the applicant
n Cornments Sign@turel7ille Qate
A_ B
wAS',y,y O
~0
zs
LEGAL DESCRIPTION r
ltiA1 LA V ~
EXPIRES1/5/ 106 v1
a ~
Lots 1,2,3 and 4, Block 4, Midway Addition, less right of way, in Spokane Countyp~IVtD
Washington SNOKANE COUNTY
NOV 2 8 2000
1 ~ IKISION OF P~NNa~G
/ "
~ Zkr-Z5-
.
IVI wI/I /JI♦
t • ' •
~ ~q2'u r ` f 1,0- • CD'09 ZT1.
4*
FZF J jr or-
i(DA iJA ~1!~ I
.`~2. ~ , .
~ , ~
4L
A$
(l.tt J . ` ' • '
► 3- F~25 -
`
~.i 0 .(2)l@) , e 3
~ ~T~7
~O~ Ie,
i ~ ii ~ ~ AI i9 e, ~ 1 ~r ~ 4 r i~ n
r9
~ ~ ~A ~ ♦
~
.
SC.CoNp N~~ ~vrf~ y ~ ~t
.
,
1 I w~T/~► ~ r~ _ A ~ '
f
~
I
U~-7~8 7d Sve~E~~
►oa t.oooz laaa+ 1j040e Iaw> >.o.oa io421 I.a2 1a404 Iaca 1Dao2 10601
E ~J a .
~ ~l^~"~ 2 9601
~ _ ' • 7~~ Y ~ L r ~ ~4i+c'`a
VR-/~O 7V •~i
ni tmie tmio 1.0409 1.aa 10411 »+~e 1~io ~a.a I~o.u laa iy~ 'ti n
` ~k ~ ~ y Fc
■ j F
• ~w
R ~ ~ y~~. ~ 5eNave
. . . ~..R ~ rv ~ ~
1 f t 1'+ ~,''n i ° ~ A } ~ ♦ ~Z N ~
tr,~Y.r' ^ t •.'G^ S 'S. °1 lr
O! 1D601 1.p601 IOSO 1D500 1AS07 1.0506 1DStp /ASM 1DSW 1.0W 1D501
871 r•J~'i~ .~1~ ~t rrr' ~ ~ ~'F° ti
~ i ~ If Y °1~ `~(iJ
y ~ 4
~.aros " C R-7 8?J Y w! Y°
n lae+e Iasio ios» »s+n ias iDSti• Iaa15 Iv51e +dW +osIe ' ° w, ~.,""~~a y ~ s~ 4= ■
Y~ h
7 F CC
~ Z0NC RCCLIISSIFICA i i0N AP('LICATION PAGE 4 Of 4
PnRT I I I
.SURVEYDR VFRIFICATION
I, tlie uncJersignect, a licensed land surveyor, have completed the inFormation requested for the
zoning map and wrilten legal description
SiJnecJ Date
Acfdress ctas C~.~ck~Phone 2- Co Co
City 4 D ~~,IVC~- J State Zip L(
."C . . . . . . . _ . . .g . _ . . . : . . .p~ . _ . . , . . ' . '
PnRT 1V
S{GNATtJRF OF PROPERTY OWNERS OR LETfEf2 OF 111J71 IORIZATIQN
I the undersigned, swear or affirm under penaity of perJury that ihe above responses are matie
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge
i (urtlier swear or affirm that 1 am the owne( of record vf the area proposed for the previoLisly
identified land use action, or, lf not the owner, attaclied herewlttt is writlen permfssion from the
owner authorizing my actions on his/her bEhalf
Signed ~t,uc~rZr~ Date
Adciress 3~ 21tr- r300N = Av r_ ~5u,T = I Phone 509- 325- $S iq
City 5~,,kA r%j= VPAsk ~52C) 2 State lNA Zip --53 ZO ?
2 ,
I I I 2 2 a0oz~
Sic~nature o applicant or represent tive Date
Sta ~ o ashmgton )
) ss Coun(y of Spol<ane )
Signed and sworn or affirmed before me on 11iis d a y of (~~Y ,/%~O,Ot3
by jo kh -T ~s W e 1-T ZEf~
WANDA T CLARK Notary Pubiic in ancl for the State of Waslimgton residing
NOTARY PUBUC at Eck
STATE OF WASHiNGTON
EXPIRES JANUAEtY4#0 2003 My appointment expires
r . _ . . _ _ _
,
- - . . . - . ~ - . - . . , ,
PAstT V
TO E3E COti1PLETED DY TFiE DIVISION OF f3UIL01NG AND PI.ANNING
Date submilted 6Z(2 Q f iie num er ~
ll '
Dafe accepted /0-0/06 E3y _
Total (ees~~~~q Oc)
l2ecelpt number
i„« „tr<il,z.lit K,s
~ o►
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTy
NO V 2 $ 2000
DMSION OF PLANNlNG
w
E w ~ w ~
A
~ ~ . YE. m ~
CHECKI: S m
m
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL
ORDINANCE
, SECTION I I 10 *,,23 0 11
r ~r
A~i
~
' rc '~'YDR`~ ~j ~ Y ~ t~ r 'j l~►~ ~ a~rer~~~ n i T ~ • J ~ ♦ ; ~f~~~~ ~r
w t
1a ~y., K1ut r Ca t~7• ~r ~ f * ~ w , ~z s~i~ r Z
~+E~7~^- ~iF J ► ~ Y~F" +'f ' w~C A+~ ~ j , 2 ~ y ^ i" n r E ~ ~ ' q 1 - li ■ ~ ~
II
e IC~
} 0 $ •
SEPA EriviRorrMElvTai, CHECHI.isT
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11 10 230(1)
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21C RCW, requues all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental unpacts of a proposal before making decisions An environmental
impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environment The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and
the agency identify unpact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid unpacts from the proposal, if it
can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required
INSTRUCTIDNS FOR APPLICANTS
This envuonmental checklist asks you to describe some basic mformation about your proposal
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental unpacts or your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise ulformation lmown, or give the best description you can
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge In most cases,
you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the
need to hire experts If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your
proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply" Complete answers to the questions now may avoid
unnecessary delays later
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoiung, shoreluie, and landmark
designations Answer these question if you can If you have problems, the governmental agencies can
assist you
The checklist questions aQply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
tune or on different parcels of land Attach any additional uiforaiation that will help describe your
proposal or its envuonmental effects The agency to wtuch you submrt this checklist may ask you to
explain your answers or provide addiuonal ulformation reasonably related to determuung if there may
be significant adverse unpact
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROJECT PROPOSALS.
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though quesuons may be answered "does not
apply " IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT ACTIONS (part D)
For non-project actions, the references ui the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and
"property or srte" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area,"
respectively
r
w3 7 t s s ~ 7' t.t
~F 1}
`y~Otr
t^ Y i n t, ,t F"'Y ~r
Spokane Envrronmental Ordinance Checkhst PaQe 2 of 21
A BACKGROUND FII.E/PROJECT NO ~
c
1 Name of proposed pro~ect, if applicable
WSDOT Private Parkin~ Lot/Park Road and First Avenue
2 Name of applicant
Washin~ton State Devartment of Transportation
3 Address and phone number of applicant and contact person
~
John T Swertzer
3929 E Boone Avenue, Suite 1
Spokane, WA 99202
(509) 326-8514 _
4 Date checkllst prepared -
October 24, 2000
5 Agency requesting checkl~st
Snokane Countv Div~sion of Planrun~
6 Proposed tuning or schedule (Lncluding phasmg, ~f applicable)
Snrine 2001
< ,
_ _ _ ~
~
A. BACKGRy"OUND. (coa~) ; _ ~ x r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ` ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ & ~r^ t+ti ~ ~ ~"4 ~ ~
~ q^ ~ s , ~ ~i.,s t - ~ ~ ~
?y~7 ~ ~ ~~`4 J l~ ~~~fy'L~' r.. r .t~' ~ r ~ i r ~
- n r ~ ~y ~ _ P ~
+ 1 sl ' j~f, t y r~j'~ ~ N w. .~~y ~ S,. ~ t .~-r Y ~~L 4 ~
.rr , h V ~
1 1 Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
7 a Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain
There are no future plans related to this proposal or srte
b Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain
Yes, WSDPT owns the off'ice building located on a 18,410 sf site to the north, the northwest corner of Park and
First Avenue
8 List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal
The Draft Snokane Countv Comprehensrve Plan, with associated and supportmg studies -
9 Do you know whether applications are penduig for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the properry covered by your proposal? If yes, explam
No known
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known
Zone Reclassification from Spokane County, Access pennits from County Engineenng,
Construction permits from County Division of Builduig
A BACKGROUND (conaaued)
Spokane Environmental Orduiance Checkhst Page 4 of 21
• Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
11 Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and
site There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to descnbe certain aspects of your proposal
You do not need to repeat those answers on tlus page
A rezone from the existmg UR-7 zone to the B-2 zone for the development of a 34-snace orivate
parkinLy lot on a 19.015 sf site The lot will be asphalt naved, and the peruneter landscaped
12 Location of the proposal Give sufficient uiformation for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, mcluduig a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s) Provide a legal description,
site plan, vicuuty map, and topographic map, if reasonably available While you should submit any plans
required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
application related to this checklist
The site is located at the southwest comer of Park Road and Fust Avenue, E 7406-7418 Fust
Avenue, Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Midway Addition, except right of wav m NE 1/4 of Sec 24, Twn 25N,
R43 E W M, Svokane Countv, Washmgton
13 Does the proposed action he within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The
Pnority Sewer Service Area? The City of Spokane? (See Spokane County's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for
boundaries)
The site is located withm the IUGA boundarv. the Aauifer Sensitive Area (ASA). and the
Priontv Sewer Service Area (PSSA), east of the Citv of Snokane
rb > t r
Spokane Environmental Orduiance Checklist Page 5 of 21
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1 EAR'rH
a General descriphon of the site (cucIe one flat, ollulg, hilly, steep slopes,
mountaulous, other Flat and at ~rade wi aiacent riQhts of wav
b What is the steepest slope on the site (approxunate percent slope)?
Site is fauIv Ievel with a-1 % slope
c What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel,
peat, muck)? If you know the classificahon of agricultural soils, specify them and
note any prune farmland
The Spokane County Soil Survev identifies the subject sods as beinQ the
Garrison eravellv Ioam senes, soiLs that are excessively eravellv, stony and
Have rapid permeabilitv
d Are there surface indicahons or history of unstable sods m the unmediate
vicinity?
If so, describe
No utdicatron or historv of unstable sods
e Descnbe the purpose, type and approxmate quanhties of any fillulg or gradulg
proposed Indicabe source of fill
The proposed parkmg lot will reawre regarding of the 19,015sf of the srte, and
no fill. Approximatelv 260 cu vds of base coarse eravel and 130 cu vds ACP
Wdl be avDhed
f Could erosion occur as a result of clearutg, constructzon, or use? If so, generally
describe
Muumal wmd and waber erosion could occur as a result of the construction
of a 34-space asphalt vaved parkmg lok
SPohaae Envmnmmml O:duiance ChakLst Page 6 of 21
• I j
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIItONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Connoued)
g About what percent of the site will be covered with unpervious surfaces after
project construction (for example, asphalt or buildulgs)?
Approxunatelv 71 °6 of the site will be covered with asphalt, and 29% with
landscapinLy
h Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other unpacts to the earth, if
any
Potential of wind erosion durme construchon phase mav be reduced bv water
Water spravs The completed developments unpervious surface, landscaping
And "208" swales will mutunize the potentral of wuld/water erosion
2 AIR
a W of emissions to the au would result from the proposal (i e dust,
utomobile, dors, uldustrial, wood smoke) dur~ng construction and w en the
pr completed? If any, generally describe and give approxunate quantities, ^
if known
TSP levels wdl u►crease from site preparahon Increase in hvdrocarbons
from asphalt utstallahon Thereafter, auto emissions mav shghtlv increase
CO levels
b Are there any off-site sources of emLssions or odor that may affect your
proposal?
If so, generally descnbe
Existzng odor from traffic alone Fu-st Avenue and Sprague Avenue to the
north
c Progosed measures to reduee or control emissions or other unpacts to au, if any
Compliance with SCAPA reeulations, paving and landscavule in the
"comnleted" vhase will reduce susvended pamculate emissions
~
,
j4 ~
°
v
t ~ _
~ ~ ~
Spokaae'Envu+onm~"eaml Ordu~iace Ch'c~1cL'st Page 7 of 21 ~
.
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Connnued)
3. WATER
a Surface
1) Is there any surface water body on or m the unmediate vicmity of the srte
(ulcludulg year-round and seasonai streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)?
If yes, descnbe type and provide names If appropriate, state what stream or
rrver it flows ulto
No
2) Will the project requue any work over, u1, or adjacent to (withu1200 feet) the
described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans
N/A
3) Estunate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed ui or r
removed from surface water or wetlands and nndicabe the area of the site that
would be affected
Indicate the source of filI matenal
N/A
4) Will the progosal require surface water wrthdrawals or drversions? Give a
general descnphon, purpose, and approxunabe quanhties if known.
No
5) Does the proposal he withut a 100-year floodplain? If so, nofie locataon on the
srte plan
No
,R
~
,
,
r ,y~
Spo~`e E+am+v++niGi+tlGi&nance CAecG Psge8 of21 ~ r•
• ' ' e
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
$ ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Connnucd)
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters'?
If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge
No
b Ground
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be dLscharged to ground water7
Give general description, purpose, and approxunate quantihes if known
Discharge of surface water runoff to "208" storm water swales
2) Descnbe waste material that will be discharged mto the ground from septic
tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility DescriEie the general size of
the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of persons the system(s) are expected bo serve
The proFOSed development is a 34-space asphalt paved parkinQ lot _
There will be no discharQe of waste material into the szround from senhc
tanks or waste water treatment facilitv
3) Descnbe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of saiutary
waste, uistalled for the purpose of dLSZharguig fluids below the ground surface
(includulg systems such as those for the disposal of storm waber or drainage
from floor dra.uts) Describe the type of sysbem, the amount of maberial to be
disposed of through the system and the tyges of matenals hkely to be disposed
of (utcluding mabenals which may enter the system madvertendy through spills
or as a result of fire fighting actrvities)
A"208" storm water swale svstem will be reQuired for the unpervious
surface storm water runoff
Spokaae Eavsrorimeaml Ordirsance CheckLat Page 9 of 21
1 1 Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Contiooed)
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in
above-ground or underground storage tanks7 If so, what types and quantrhes
of matenals wiil be stored?
In the developed "completed" phase, ferhlizers and pesbcides will be
applied to the landscaped areas Chemicals will not be stored on site
5) What protechve measures wil.l be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any
chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater
(ttus uncludes measures to keep chemicals out of dLsposal systems described u1
3b(2) and 3b(3)?
There will be no storaQe or use of chemicals on site
c Water Runoff (ulcludmg storm water)
1) Describe the source of runoff (includulg storm water) and method of collechon
and dLSposal, if any (ulclude quanhhes, if known) Where will this water flow7
Will this waber flow mto other wabers? If so, describe
Storm water wffl be diverted to "208" storm water swales
2) Wiil any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the srte in a locahon where a
spill or leak will dram to surface or groundwater or fio a storm water di.sposal
system dischargulg to surface or groundwater?
No
3) Could waste matenals enter ground or surface wafiers? If so, generally descnbe
No
,
Spoksne Envuonmenml Ordinance Chec.kLst Page 10 of 21
. ,
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued)
d Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water
unpacts, if any (if the proposed actlon hes withm the Aquifer Sensihve Area be
especially clear on explanahons relahng to faclhhes concerning Sections 3b(4),
3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklLSt)
The development of an on-site storm dramage svstem that complies with
Spokane County and "208" Storm Water Svstem Standards
4 PLANTS
a Check or cucle types of vegetatron found on the site
deciduous tree alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree fir, cedar, pu1e, other
X shrubs
X grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet sod plants cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
other
water glants water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetahon
b What ku►d and amount of vegetataon wili be removed or alfiered?
The site is a vacant dirt varkulQ lot with izrass and a bush or two alonQ the south
edQe of the site Also, there are two mature maple trees locate at the SEC. One
of the trees mav be removed The remainine erass and bushes will be replaeed
wrth a 5' landscave stno alonQ the south ed¢e of the site
c. LLSt threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the sibe
No known threafiened or endanQered species are on or near the sifie
d Proposed landscapulg, use of native plants, or other
measures fio preserve or enhance vegetahon on the srte, if any
Landscapulg along the south and west 5' will include columnar arbor vita and
tall Oreeon Qrave; there will be Qrassed drauta¢e swales on the north and
mountain lover and red maple along the north and east boundaries. fRefer
to landscape plan.l All landscaved areas will have an automahc sprinkler svs.
~
l s
~poksneE'nvuonmenml Ordinance Chechhst ~ Psge 11 of 21
. .
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Coodnued)
5. ANIMALS
a Cucle any buds and anunals which have been observed on or
near the site or are known to be on or near the site
buds hawk, heron, eagle songbuds ther Robuls, sparrows, crows
mammals deer, bear, elk, beaver, other
fish bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b Li.st any threatened or endangered specles known to be on or near the site
N/A
c Is the site part of a migration route7 If so, explain
N/A
d Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any
Installahon of landscapine per the propased Iandscape vlan will help
prnserve and create a new habitat for wildlife
6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES
a What kulds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil,, wood stove, solar) will be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used
for heatu►g, manufacturutg, ebc
The automatic sprulkler svstem and the three heht standards will require
electricitv, to be provided by AVISTA Corp
b Would your project affect the potenhal use of solar energy by adjacent
propemes?
If so, generally descnbe
N/A
Y A
Spokane Eavuonmetital Ordtasace CheikLst ~"4~` Pnge 12 of 21
1 ~
Evaluation For
Agency Use On1y
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Cootinued)
c What kmds of energy conservation features are utcluded ut the plans of this
proposal7 List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy unpacts,
if any
Photo cell hQhhnQ controls
7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
a Are there any envuonmental health hazards, ulcludulg exposure to toxic
chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur
as a result of thLS proposal? If so, describe
No
1) Describe special emergency services that might be requued
Police, fire and medical
2) Froposed measures to reduce or control envuonmentai health hazards, if any:
Comphanee with all state and countv code rectuuements, and zonulQ
condihons of aiDproval
b Noise
1) What types of noLSe exist u1 the area which may affect your project (for example
tra.ffic, equipment, operation, other)?
Traffic noise from First Avenue/Vallev Couplet and SpraQue Avenue to the
north
2) What types and Ievels of noLse would be creabed by or associabed wrth the project
on a short•berm or a long-tierm basis (for example. traffic, constructionr
operation, other)? Indwatie what hours noise -would come from the site.
Short tenn: ¢radintz and construction. Lone berm: traffic and people noise.
' Peak ho~uTrs of rioisewill_occur between 7f 30`a ~b~ 9.~am~and 4:30jpm 4o.6:00 ipm r ~
'u~l Fr I'" e j r 1 wr„ S~ $ • ~ ~ ~4~x
r ,~f, ~ rY• ~~~fl~ ~i7:17~'2
i, tqy ~ ~ t t »i ~ ~ r s ti ~ ^ T r r
! Vr
Spokane~rEavu+osimet~ml'~OItrduiance Chcclclist 4~+' ~ i ' , ~ ~ ~ - • Ps+g~e, 13 of 21 "
1 1
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMFNTS (Coodoued)
3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise unpacts, if any
LandscapinQ as ver plan wffl mihQate the noise unpact upon complehon
8 LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a What is the current use of the site and adjacent properhes?
The site is vacant and is currentIv a du-t parkule Iot The adiacent land use
mcludes north: Valley Couplet, WSDOT office, & a strip retail b1dQ, south
15' wide alley, 3 singIe-fam res , east: Rose Haven MHP, west: vacant land
b Has the site been used for agnculture? If so, describe
Site has not been used for agriculture for 50+ years
c Descnbe any structures on the srte
Vacant srte, used as a dirt parkYng Iot
d Wiil any structures be demolished? If so, wluch?
The site is a vacant dirt uarkulQ lot There were 3 older residences locatied
on the propertv that were removed for the construction of the Vallev Couplet.
e What Ls the current zoiung classif'ication of the srte?
Urban Residential - 7 (UR-7).
,
I~1/1
•IJl4
-
Pl
Spoksn~e En~i~n~t~tl Ordla'a~ ~CheckLtt Pqe 14 of 21
~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Coatiaued)
f What is the current Comprehensive Plan designahon of the site7
Urban/Transibon Area, Prouertv located to the north is desiQnated
Maior Commercial
g If applicable, what is the current shorelu►e master program designabon of the
site7
N/A
h Has any part of the site been classified as an "envuonmentally sensihve" azea?
If so, specify
N/A
i Approxunately how many people wouid reside or work in the completed
project7
Site Ls vacant There are 35 WSDOT and 10 WSP emplovees that wilI use this
proDOSed 34-snace parkul¢ lot and the exLstinQ 33-svace Iot located west of the
Office buildulQ on the north side of Fust Avenue
i Approxunately how many people would the completed project displace?
Site is vacant
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement unpacts, if any
No measures needed
1 Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and
projecbed land uses and plans, if any
Complianc1e wrth all zonm¢ standards and zone chanee condihons of
apDroval
Spokane F.nviroanental Ordinance CheckLst Page 15 of 21
t r .
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Coohoued)
9 HOVSnvG
a Approxunately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether
hzgh, middie, or low-ulcome housulg
N/A
b Approximately how many units, if any, would be eluninated? Indicate whether
high, middle, or low-ulcome housulg
N/A - site is vacant
c Proposed measures to reduce or control housing unpacfis, if any
No measures requued
10. AESTHETICS
a. What Ls the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not includulg antennas,
what is the prutcipal extenor buiIding maberial(s) proposed?
No structures vrovosed, there will be 3 each, 30' round aluminum hght poles
b What views u1 the immediabe vicLruty would be altered or obstrucbed?
None
c Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthehc impacts, if any
Placement of utilities under¢round
The proposed landscaping will mclude columnaz arbor vita for screeiunv,/
bufferule iDurposes
~
Spokaae Eavmosimental Ord:naflcc Check4st Page 16 of 21
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Coornued)
11 LIGHT AND GLARE
a What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would
it mautly occur?
ParkinQ lot lieht (3 each, mount lumularies on 30' round aluminum poles),
and vehicle liQhts m the evenule
b Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or ulterfere with
views?
No With "downliQhhng " and landscapinv, the light/ Qlare unpact will be
minunal
c What exLShng off-site sources of hght or glare may affect your proposal7
Velucle liLyhts in the eveninQ alonQ First Avenue and Park Road
d Proposed measures to reduce or control hght and glaze unpacts, if any
DownLghting and landscaping/screerunQ
12 RECREATION
a What designated and mformal recreahonal oppominitres are ut the unmediate
viciiuty?
DLShman Hills Natural Area Ls auproxunafielv ~/a mile to the easr
Edgechff Countv Park Ls located 5 blocks to the south
b Would the proposed project dLsplace any existing recreational uses? If so,
descn'be.
No.
Spokane Em►uonmenml Orduaace CheckLst Pap 17 of 21 '
. ~ ~ .
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Coodooed)
c Proposed measures to reduce or control unpacts on recreation, ulcludulg
recreation opporturuhes to be provided by the project or applicant, if any
None required
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, nahonal, state, or local
preservataon regLsters, known to be on or next to the site7 If so, generally
descnbe
No
b Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological,
scientihc or cultural unportance known to be on or next to the site
N/A
c Proposed measures to reduce or control unpacts, if any
N/A
14. T'RANSPORTATION
a Identify pubhc streets and highways servir►g the sifie and descnbe proposed
access fio the exishng street system Show on sibe plans, if any
First Avenue is a new, 4-lane/one-wav (eastbound) artenal located adjacent
and to the north Pazk Road is a Z-lane/two-wav arterial located adiacent and
to the east The Fust Ave/ Park Rd mtersection is signalized Both artenals
are paved wrth curbs and sidewalks
b Is site cunently served by pubhc transrt? If not, what is the approxunate
distance bo the nearest transrt stop?
The sibe has the availability of STA bus service, with Routie 94 exbendin¢ alon¢
First Avenue and Park Road
Spokane Envuonmental Ordumce Checkhst Page l 8 of 21
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
B ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Conhnued)
c How many parkutg spaces would the completed project have7 How many
would the project elunulate?
The subject proposal is for a 34-space private parkuliz lot
d Will the proposal requue any new roads or streets, or improvements to existang
roads or streets, not including dnveways7 If so, generally descnbe (indicate
whether pubbc or private)
No new unprovements required
e Wi11 the project use (or occur u► the immediate vicutity oo water, rail, or au
transportahon? If so, generally describe
No
f How many velucular trips per day would be generated by the completed
project? If known, mdicate when peak volumes would ocrur
The complebe prolect will not Qenerabe anv velucle tnps It will
accommodate the exLstinQ WSDOT office to the north.
g Proposed measures to reduce or control transportahon unpacts, if any
Location of access ooutts onto First Avenue and Park Road as per
Spokane Countv Traffic Entzineer's Reauirements
15. PUBLIC SERVICEs
a Would the project result u1 an vncreased need for pubhc services (for example
fire probection, pohce protechon, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
descnbe
This proposal mav result in the increased need for police vrotiechon, and
Spokane Countv Storm Drainne Departinent servites The parkine lot should
not increase the need for other pubhc services
k
1!
4
A*, ~X~
Spoa'ne+nvironmental Ordiriance Checlk`1'ist ~R ~ P19 of 21 ~
Evaluation For
Agency Use Onl)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Conhoued)
b Proposed measures to reduce or control duect unpacts on public services, if any
N/A
16 UTILITIES
a Cucle ufilihPS r,iTTPntlv available at the sit ectricity, natural gas, water, refusP
<Zetvice, telephone, saruta se , sephc system, other
b Describe the utilihes that are proposed for the project, the utility providulg the
service, and the general construchon acrivities on the site or in the unmediate
vicinity which might be needed
Electriclty will be vrovided bv AVISTA Corp The vroiect is for a 34-space
parkule lot to accommodate overflow parking for the WSDOT office to the
north
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to
the best of my knowledge I also understand that, should there be any wffiful mLsrepresentahon or wfflful
lack of full disclosure on my part, the gZency may withdraw any determinahon of non-signaficance that it
might Lssue ul rehance upon this checkbst
Date: October 24, 2000
Proponent: Wash. State Dept of Transvortation Proponent: l '
(Please type or print) ~ (Signature) v
% john T. Sweitz.er
Address: 3928 E Boone Avenue, Suite 1 City, State, Zitp Svokane, WA 99202
Phone- (509) 325-8514
Person completing the form Tohn T Sweatzer Date October 24, 2000
Phone f5091325-8.514
Spokane Envuonmenml Ordinance CheckLst Page 20 of 21
FOR STAFF USE ONLY
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist
Based on this staff review of the envuonmental checklist and other pemnent utformahon, the staff
A Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse unpacts and recommends a
determvnation of nonsignificance (DNS)
B Concludes that probable signaficant adverse envuonmental unpacts do exist for the current
proposal and recommends a mingated determinahon of nonsignificance with condihons
(MDNS)
C Concludes that there are probable significant adverse envuonmental unpacts and recommends
a determulation of significance (DS)
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE
Spokaae Envuonmental Ordinance CheckLst Page 21 of 21 . .
SPOB:ANE COLJN'I'Y B SION OF BUII.DING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WA 99260-0050
(509) 477-3675
( SITE INPORMAT'ION PROJECT INFORMATION ~
Site Address: 7418 E 1ST AVE Prnject Number. 00010843 tnv: 1 Issue Date:
SPOKANE, WA 99212 ermit Use: ZE-32-00
Farrel Number. 35241.0401
Subdivision: CONVERTED CN1Y DATA AppGcant: }3L•;L, FVL1_YNE
glac;; La t: 7418 E 1 ST AVE
SPOKANE, WA 99212 Phtine: 1,509) 5-8514
Zoaing: RHM Contact: JOHN SWEI77.ER
Owner: BII,, LVELYNE
Address: 7418 E 1 ST AVE
Phonc: l 5(19 i 3 25-18;1 4
SPOKANE, VJA 99212
Inspector: MARC STRAUB ethacks - Frunt: Lcft: Right: Rear:
Water Dist: UNKNOWN
Group Name, "l.E-32-00
Project Name:
C PERMff(s) )
Zolfe C7tcr7tge Contmctor. I.icen.~e
ENVIRONMFNfAL REVIEW $75.00 ENQINEERS REYIBW S200.00
REZANE TO B-1. B-2. B•3 1 S1.8Z3.00 PRE-APP CONFERENCE S56.00
UTILTITES REVIEW S100.00
Total Permlt Fee: $2.254.00
-
AM W64 It: at~~'r.„_
, . . 4dhfb 'fVA t1 tj
~t~&i~3$~''•A~ ~.I Ili I~~ : R~Rfs;ttf ; r-
'%''•~'1' G'~ t;i 'i; ' -i•.r, .
~ . PAYl1ENi' SU1biMARY Page l of 1 NOTES ~
PERMIT Prncdsed By: WRIGHT, RHE
Prlnted By: CUMNIDVGS, KA'IffY
. Trsn D~ Recvbt # Pavment Amt
l 1R9/00 10114 $2,254.00
, . .
T°ta, AmountPoid AmouetOwine ,c~n•~~i.:~~:~.52,254.00 $2,254.00 50.40
. . . r r ~
Spokane County
Public Works Departfnent
Divison of Buil.ding & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Number: 10114 Customer Number
Projects
Frill
Project Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Amt Owing PAID Pnrt
00010843 1 $2,254.00 $2,254.00 $2,254.00 $2,254.00 ~
Total: $2,254.00 $2,254.00 $2,254.00 $2,254.00
Miscellaneous Items
Tota! PAID: $2,254.00
Tender
Type Check Acct Balance CCNbr E~px Drrte 7'ENDERED
Checkl 5392 2,254.00
Total TENDERED: 2,254.00
Over / (Short) $0.00
Change $0.00
Notes:
Tranpo1e / TLne: 11 /29/00 11:11:11 AM
By: KCumming
Logon User: KCUMMING
Statlon: KCUMMING
Overrlde By:
Prinled: 11129/n011:11:12 AM Page 1 of 1