The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-46-90 r SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINI)IrIGS OF FACT. CONCL.IISIONS AND ORDER IN'Y'RODUCTION This matter has come before the Hearmg Exanuner Commuttee on December 20, 1990 The members of the Comrmttee present are Verona Southern, Cha,uperson, Harry Gibbons and Phil Hams PROPOSAL The sponsor, Redeemer Lutheran Chiuch, requests approval of a Zone Reclassificanon, File No ZE-46-90, for the purpose of developing 34 apartments (retirement aparnnents) on approxlmately 2 9 acres FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS 1 The property is generally located ui the Spokane Valley east of and adjacent to Schafer Road and approxumately 350 feet southwest of Dishman Niica Road ui Section 32, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington 2 The comunittee adopts the Plammmg Department Report as a part of tlus record. 3 The exisang land use(s) in the area is pnmanly single family residences A church is located across Schafer Roa.d from the site 4 The Comprehensive Plan designates tlus site as Urban The Urban category is intended to provide for development of a city lilce envumnment, including residenual densities of 1 to 17 wuts per acre This proposal is for 12 uruts per acre 5 The Artenal Road Plan designates Schafer Road as a minor artenal, with a recommended nght of way width of 80 feet. Exisnng nght of way width is 60 feeL The Engmeers office has requu-ad that 5 feet of additionai nght of way be dedicated along Schafer Road and the 5 additional feet be set aside for future nght of way acquisinon 6 The project is within the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Public Sewer Service is requu-ed for the project 7 The existing zorung of the property descnbed m the apphcaaon is Agncultune, previously established in 1959 8 The provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Pohcy Act) have been comphed with and a Deternunauon of Nonsignificance was issued 9 The legal requutments for public noace have been fulfilled. 10 The owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use expressing the following concerns 1 t , y HEC Order for ZE-46-90 Page 2 a Project will increase traffic on Schafer Road and at the Schafer Road/Dishman Niica Road intersection b Lack of sidewalks on Schafer Road will create a safety hazand for pedestnans including elderly residents of the proposal c Nearby railroad creates noise which will d.isturb residents d Bus sennce is not available at the site Elderly residents must cross Dishman Niica Road to reach bus stop e Projects access to Old Schafer Road will create safety hazard for children curnendy using the road to nde bilces f The anea is pnmanly single famfly housing The mulaple fanaily project is not compatible 11 The proposed zoning does implement and conform to the Comprehensive Plan 12 1'he proposed use will not be detnmental to the pubhc health, safety, morals or welfare 13 The Committee additionally finds/concludes a. That the project will increase uaffic on Schafer Roa.d and at the intersection of Schafer Road and Dishman Mica Road b That the lack of pedestnan faciLees along Schafer Road may create a safety hazard c That the projects distance from mnsit faciliaes wnll limit transgortation options for the residents SZBDFB The Hearmg Examiner Comnuaee, pursuant to the above Findings of Fact and Conclusion, DENIES vvithout prejudice the apphcation of Redeemer Lutheran Church for the zone reclassif'icaaon as descnbed in the apphcation ZE-46-90 Motion by Hams Seconded by Gibbons Vote (3-0) UNANIMOUS TO DENY WITHOUT PREJLJDICE THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION •1 s 1 r , HEC Order for ZE-46-90 Page 3 HEARING QLAMINER QQMMI'I'IEE HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE A, Ch V J V ~ ` V ATI7EST For WALLIS D HUBBARD Planrung Dmtar TEVE HO BIO SKI Current Planrun strator 12-211-20 D= kc Pursuant to County regulaaons, any aggneved party has the nght to appeal this wntten decision to the Spokane County Board of County Comnussioners vvithm ten (10) calendar days of the signuig of this order Upon receipt of an appeal, a pubiic heanrig will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must subrYUt a wntten appeal, preferably on forms designed for such purpose, to the Board of County Comnussioners, W 1116 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, along vvith $100 processing fee payable to the Spokane County Treasurer If you have any questions, please call the Planning Deparunent at 456-2205 rev 1/90 19 w ' NO 91 0345 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN TI-E MATTER OF ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) FINDINGS OF ZE-46-90 URBAN RESIDENTIAL -3 5(UR-3 5) ) FACT, CONDITIONS URBAN RESIDENTIAL -12 (UR-12) ) AND DECISION SPONSOR REDEEMER LU1'HER.AN CHURCH THIS MATTER, being consldered by the Board of County Commussioners of Spokane County, hereinafter referred to as the "Board", of an appeal of the Spokane County Heanng Examiner Committee decision of December 20, 1990, wherein said comnuttee denied the proposal to de-velop 34 renrement apartments The Board received an appeal application on December 24, 1990 by Grant Person, agent for Redeemer Lutheran Church The Board held a de novo public heanng on January 29, 1991, and having fully considered all testimony presented, and having ind.ividually acquainted themselves with the vicinity and the site in quesnon, chd reach a decision on February 12, 1991, to grant the appeal and approve the proposal subject to certain conditions and in doing so dld enter the following FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the December 20, 1990 PLANNING REPORT was considered as well as the staff presentanon before the Board 4 2 That the December 20, 1990 Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order were considered 3 That the file of ZE-46-90 was available for consideranon by the Board 4 That the proper legal requirements for advernsing of the heanng before the Board have been met 5 That the provisions of Chapter 43 21 C RCW (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied wlth and a Determination of Nonslgnificance (DNS) was issued The Board concurs with the Determination of Nonslgnificance 6 That the proposal is to be located on a 2 9 acre site located in the Spokane Valley east of and adjacent to Schafer Road and approximately 350 feet southwest of the intersection of the Dishman Mica Road and Schafer Road in Section 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington This is a unique shaped site created as a result of the realignment of Old Schafer Road 7 That the density of the revised proposal is 12 dwelling units per acre 1'his density is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan provides that properties located within the Urban Category may have densihes from one (1) to seventeen (17) units per acre when located within the Pnonry Sewer Service Area (PSSA) boundanes 8 The proposal is located adjacent to single family residences on the southwest To the northwest across Schafer Road from the site, the Redeemer Lutheran Church ls located To the southeast across Old Schafer Road from the site single family residences are located Adjacent to the site's northeast boundary the railroad nght of way is located 9 Owners of property located near the proposal expressed disapproval of the proposed use due to the following concerns a The proposed renrement apartments are not companble with the existing single family residences ~ . ZE-46-90 BOCC FINDINGS AND DECISION Page 2 b The surrounding roadways are not adequate to accommodate the traffic that would be generated by the proposal c The water pressure in the area is not adequate to supply the proposal and exisnng water uses 10 The Redeemer Lutheran Church onglnally owned the property upon which the church is located, as well as the rezone proposal site, as one parcel The County Enguieer's realignment of Schafer Road caused the Church's property to be bisected This fact, along with the increased traffic on Schafer Road, demonstrate changed conditions warranting the rezone request 11 Gary Kennelly, Counry Traffic Engineer, testified that Schafer Road was designed to accommodate 6,000 vehicles per day and that the intersection of Schafer Road and Dishman Mica Road is in the process of being upgraded This fact substantiates that the proposal will not cause traffic problems 12 The record indicates that water will be supplied to the proposal by Spokane County Water Distnct No 3 The Water Distnct has the legal obligation to make available appropnate water supplies to propernes within its Distnct boundanes accordingly the proposal makes adequate provisions for water service 13 The zone reclassificanon will not be demmental to the public health, safety, morals or welfare, especially when conditions as provided for herein after DECISION From the foregoing Findings, the Board hereby APPROVES the appeal of Redeemer Lutheran Church for the zone reclassification of Urban Residenual -3 5 (UR-3 5) to Urban Residential -12 (UR-12) for the property descnbed in the application ZE-46-90 and provides the following . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 No access, to include emergency access, will be allowed from the site to Old Schafer Road 2 There shall be no storage of recreational vehicles, trailers or boats on the site 3 The applicant shall enter into an agreement, as prepared by the Spokane County Prosecunng Attorney's Office, which shall limit the use of the site to 34 retirement apartments In the event the present or subsequent owners desire to change the use from 34 retlrements apartments to apartments or any other use, whether authonzed or not within the Urban Residential -12 (UR-12) zone, the owner shall be responslble for malang applicanon to the Planning Department for a change of condition This applicahon will require a public heanng The agreement, as prepared by the Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney's Office vvill be recorded in the Spokane County Auditor's Office and run with the land IN REFERENCE T4 THE ATTACHED FINDINGS & ORDER, THE BC)ARD OF CntJNTY COMMISSTONERS ADOPTS THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS 4F, APPRQVAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT CUNDITIC)NS 1 The wning map sha11 be changed to Urban Residennal-12 (UR-12) after appeal penod(s) have expued and all development shall comply with Urban Residential - 12 (UR-12) standards 2 Approval is requued by the Planning Director/designee of a specific ligheng and signing plan for the descnbed propercy pnor to the release of any bullding pennits 3 A specific landscape plan, planang schedule and provislons for maintenance acceptable to the Planning Directoridesignee shall be subrrutted wnth a performance bond for the project prior to release of buildhng pernuts I ZE-46-90 BOCC FINDINGS AND DECISION Page 3 Landscaping shall be installed and ma.intauned so that sight d.istance at access points is not obscured or impaued 4 The Planmng Department shall file with the Spokane Counry Auditor, within the same tune frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposiaon, including lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows "Pnor to the issuance of any building pernut for any building or any use on the property descnbed herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane Caunty, Section 14 706 (Aquifer Sensiuve Area Overlay Zone) The property which is the subject of this nonce is more particularly descnbed as follows That pomon of the E 1C2 of the NE 1/4 descnbed as follows Beglnning at the intersectlon of the westerly nght of way hne of the O W R& N Company Railroad nght of way and northwesterly of the nght of way line of Old Schafer Road, thence southwesterly along said razlroad nght of way 240 feet, thence north 59°36'42" west 44$ 48 feet, thence north 30° 11'30" west 475 feet, thence north 30 feet, thence north 42°35'S9" west 662 84 feet, thence south 69°57' 11 " east 535 20 feet to the westerly line of said railroad nght of way, thence southerly along said nght of way line to the point of beginning, except road and except that portion thereaf lying northwesterly of the southeasterly nght of way line of Schafer Road as relocated, in Sectlon 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington S The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Nonce noting that the property in quesaon is subject to a vanety of speclal conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use acnon This Title Nohce shall serve as publlc nonce of the condiaons of approval affecting the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded wnthin the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only, be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows The parcel of property legally described as (legal description) is the subject of a land use action by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County on January 29, 1991, imposing a variety of special development cond,tions File No ZE-46-90 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department 6 The Spokane County Plammng Department shall prepare and record with the County Audhtor a Title Nonce specifying a future land acquisiaon area for road nght-of-way and ualities The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department The notice should be recorded vvithin the same time frame as an appeal and shall provide the following a At least five feet of reserved future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utiliaes, in addition to the exisnng andlor newly dedicated nght-of-way along Schafer Road NOTE The County Engineer has requued five feet of new dedicaaon b Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning ' Code shall be measured from the reserved future acuisinon area c No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed slgns should be located within the future acquisition area for road nght-of-way and utiliaes If any of the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made d The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be pnvate property and may be used as allowe.d in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be consldered intenm uses CQIJNTY ENGINEERING CONDITIONS Pnor To The Issuance Of A Buildine Permit Or Use Of The Propertv As Pronosed l Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Schafer Road for right-of-way ZE-46-90 BOCC FINDINGS AND DECISION Page 4 2 Access germits for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer 3 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans 4 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Eng-ineer and the Spokane County Health Dismct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entue project, or portlon thereof, if the development is to be phased 5 A parlang plan and traffic circulaaon plan shall be subrrntted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The deslgn, locanon and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineenng practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 6 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, wnth the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to parncipate in any peauon or resoluaon which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement Ihsmct (RID) for said improvement, pursuant to RCW 36 88, as amended Spokane County wYll not parcicipate in the cost of these improvements This is applicable to Schafer Road 7 As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Englneer, accomplish the road unprovements stated hereln by joimng and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements This is applicable to Schafer Road 8 The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer 9 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Secondary Artenal standard for the improvement of Schafer Road, wluch is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addition of approximately 4- 6 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development The construcnon of curbing and sidewalk is also required 10 All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specificaaons for Road and Bndge Construcaon and other applicable County standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer 11 Applicant shall construct a paved and delineated approach(es) to meet the existing pavement on Schafer Road 12 Roadway standards, typical roadway Sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposdl 13 This subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been idenhfied by the Spokane County Engineer's office as having stormwater runoff problems Since this plat or development proposal is affected by or is a contnbutor to stormwater flows, propercy owners should participate in the planning and implementaaon of a future basinwide stormwater management system The follownng statement shall be placed in the plat dedication "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County-approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public heanngs for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, constructing, maintaining or operanon of stormwater control facilities " 14 The regulanons of the National Flood Insurance Program shall be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a flood hazard zone A development pernut shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance No 88-0521) u ZE-46-90 BOCC FINDINGS AND DECISION Page 5 15 No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed public nght-of-way until a pennit has been issued by the County Engineer All work wnthin the public road nght-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer 16 All requued construction within the existing or proposed pubhc nght-of-way is to be completed pnor to the release of a build.ing permit, or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construcaon of unprovements shall be filed wlth the Counry Engineer 17 Apphcant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No 6 which specifies the following The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place theu name(s) on a pehnon for the formation of a Road Improvement Dismct (RID) by the peanon method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which pention includes the owner(s) property, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the formaaon of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which resolunon includes the owner(s) propercy If an RID is formed by either the petinon or resolunon method, as provided for in Chapter 36 88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree (a) that the improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (b) that the benefits to be derlved from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participanon, exceeds the cost and expense of formanon of the RID, and (c) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed Provlded further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment on the property ° as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petinon or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW This requuement applies to Schafer Road, from which the subject parcel takes access 18 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies Schafer Road as a M.inor Artenal The existing nght-of-way wndth of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan In order to implement the Artenal Road Plan, in adciiaon to the requued nght-of-way dedication, a smp of property S feet in width along the Schafer Road frontage shall be set aslde in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when artenal improvements are made to Schafer Road 19 County Engineenng has reviewed this proposal based on an elderly housing concept Should these apartments be constructed for an occupancy other than for elderly housing further revYew of road improvements shall be warranted S'O ;NTY HEALTH DISTRICT CONDITIONS 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County 2 Water service shall be coordlnated through the Director of Utilines, Spokane County 3 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Reglonal EngYneer (Spokane), State Department of Health 4 A public sewer system will be made available for the project, and individual sernce wnll be provided to each lot pnor to sale Use of individual on-site sewage d.isposal systems shall not be authonzed 5 Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited f ZE-46-90 BOCC FINDINGS AND DECISION Page 6 CnjTNTY VTII.ITIES DEPARTNiENT CONDITIONS 1 Applicant shall make connection to public sewer system Sewer connection permit is required Plans and specificatlons are to be reviewed and approved by the Ualiaes Department SO PNTY BTJII,DINQ AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS, 1 Requuements of Fue Distnct No 1 need to be satisfied dunng the building pernut process 5POKANE C`OIJNTY AIR POLLt1TInN C'.ONTROL AtJTHORITY CONDTTInNS. 1 Air pollution regulations requue that dust ertussions dunng demolinon, construcaon and excavanon projects be controlled This may requue use of water sprays, tarps, spnnklers or suspenslon of activity dunng certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated, and emissions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controlled, as well as emissions from all other constructlon-related acaviaes 2 All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean 3 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces 4 SCAPCA Regulation I, Arncle V, requires that a Nonce of Construcnon and Applicahon for Approval be submitted to and approved by our agency pnor to the construction, installation or establishment of an air pollution source • 5 Debns generated as a result of thls project must be disposed by means other than burning BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS /2' DAY O ARCH, 1991 BOARD OF C MISSIONERS ve Hass hairman tJoh McB de . Pamcia A Mummey Vote of the Board of Spokane County Commissioners as follows Commissioner Steve Hasson - Aye Comrrussioner John McBnde - Aye Comrrussioner Patncia Mummey - Aye ATTEST E DONAHRI-K of the Board By 4ose ontague, Deputy CffTk , t i a ~ N , ZE-46-90 BOCC FINDINGS AND DECISION Page 7 QFFICIAL NnTICE FOR DATE AND PLACE FOR COMMENCING AN APPEAL NO.TE n o WAC 197-11-6R0(5,; notice is here,~given ~h~ Board of ~ntv ommisslone,~r in con~,uncclon wlth the anproval of the a,bove-referenced m~r (1) That time lirYUt for commencing an appeal of the approval of the above- referenced matter, as provided by County ordinance, is thirty (30) calendar days from the Board of County Commissioner's execution of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions (2) The time frame for appealing and SEPA issues with respect to the approval of the above-referenced matter is thu-ty (30) days after the execunon of the above Findings of Fact, Decision and Conditions (3) The appeal of either the approval of the above-referenced matter or any SEPA issues must be filed in the Spokane County Supenor Court or a court of competent junsdiction as provided by law C ~ ~ . Blclq. Permit Fee Nc.. Fil.e No. -4- ' Pr -3.j ec t Name Ad d r e ~ s F•ar c e l Nco S onsc►r' s Name , Rhone # r_Z f Z~1 1( t C7 c,ll ar_ Z: F'eY 5lx1 D,.AtE-- Suhmitted Descriptic-n Init i~..~ls SPOKANE eOUIJTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLiC'ATION FOR ZOIVE REC'1-ASSTFIGATInIy Date 4ctcber 8, 1990 Application No -L I • t, v c Name of applicant Radeezrer Lutheran Giurch . Street address of applicant S 3606 Schafer Road . City Spakane State Wr Zip Code 99206 Phone 9 6-63h ~ Name of property owner(s) RedeP_mer Lutheran CJ2Urch Authorized agent representing owner (if other than owner) J Grant nerson (phone 623-1000) Existing zoning classification Agricultural Date existing zone classification established jq 5q Existing use of property Vacant Proposed zone classification UR"12 Proposed use of property Elderly/ Pets.rement Apas-tment Legal descnP ti0n Of Prop erty pTN OF E~ OF NEia DAF BEG AT INTR OF WLY R/W LN OF OWR&N CO RR R/W AND NWLY R/W LN OF OLD SHA~ER R.D TH SWLY ALG SD RD R/W 240FT TH N59DEG 36MIN 42SDS W448 48FT TH N30DEG 111tiIIN 30SDS W475FT TH N30FT TH N42DEG 35MIN 59SDS W662 84FT TH S69DEG 57MIN 11SDS E535 20FT TO WLY LN OF SD RR R/W TH SLY ALG SD R/W LN TO POB EXC RD AND EXC THAT PTN THEREOF LYING NWLY OF THE SELY R/W LINE OF SCHAFER ROAD AS RELOCATED Section 32 Township 25 Range 44 Source of legal Title Obr-Panv - From CJoLmtv Peoords Assessor's Parcel No (see tax statement) 45321 9103 Propeny size amnrox 100 , OOOSFpntage Approx 450 Feet on Schafer Pbad Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor 7-, acre - arross rd Street address of property appnox S 3600 Schafer If you do not hold title to the property affccted by this application, what is your intcrest in it? Hold tttle Please list previous Planning Dcpartment actions involving this property none ALL OF THE FOLLOWIING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED 1 What are the changed conditions of the slte area which you feel make this proposal is warranted? a cli.sadvantacred Parcel not well su-Lted for sinale familv deveJo-._t, no-c fazm land 2 What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties'7 It will buffer the adiacent properties frorl the Pall Foad tracks and near bv cormercial develornre.nt This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation with the agencies identified Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department ~ ~ / ~ APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PAGE 2 1 CO[ TNTY ENGINEM'S 4FFTCE A preliminary consultation has been held ta discuss the proposal Our re ements : r submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied 40 (Sig ature (Dat 2 SQI1N'TY UTILITiE$ OFFI(M A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone av bee il-f ~ - n r. sa fied The d ;Sgl nated water purveyor for this stte is nat ure) (Date) 3 W ATER PLJR VEYlJR a) The proposal (is)(rgmnve`) located within the boundary of our service area b) Satisfactory arrangements (iam)(have not) been made to serve this proposal c) o,Ne.,-r% c) We (are)(aftm%st) able to serve this site with adequateAwater Fi/igz ~J7, ature) (Date) 4 gt1ILDING A._ND SAFETY DEPARTMENT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone haye been satisfied This proposal is flocated in Frre Distnct No C ~7'y/ ~ t~i / y C;'c. ' (Signlature) ~ (Da4) 5 COtTNTY HEALTH DI TRiCT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal The Ncalint has e informed of our requirements and standards (SIg re) ~ (Date) I THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOYE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFUL.LY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT j AM THE OWNER 4F RECORD OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR IF NOT THE O R, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM D O NER RIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF ~..•.~i~N ~kkgned) Date ~•'p" t'IA s(%,dd~ S s 3CC~~ erG? te Phone . ~ j • ~ j , C<<10--~~, Zip O ~ ~f;1. Y .A,~ Date A ~ yo ~~S O41•''c~ t~E~sEA., SIGNATUR70APPLICAN/T- R ENT / o , Z _ ~/L Date 1 REV 4 9 fcu - YUAM~v • 3a ~~-Si~~C~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' @-PFLjCATION FOR ZONE RECLASSTFICATION Date October a, 1990 Application No Name of applicant Fe'deerrer Lutheran Church Street address of applicant S 3606 Schafer Rbad City Spokane S tate Wr Zip Code 99 206 Phone 9 25-h 3h 3 h'ame of property owner(s) Redeemer Lutherar1_Q1UrXh Authorized agent representing owner (if other than owner) JGrant nerson (phone 623-1000) Existing zoning classification Aqricu1tural Date existing zone classiFcation established l q 54 Existing use of property Vaeant Proposed zone classification UR-12 Proposed use of property Elderly/ Retireirent Apartment Legal R R/W AND I~WLY d R/W ~N OF O~D o ~Hert AFER T R.D O TH E SWLY ALG SD RD E R/W T 24INTR 0FT OTH N59DEG 36MIN 2SDS F4ON CO R. W448 48FT TH N30DEG 11MIN 30SDS W475FT TH N30FT TH N42DEG 35MIN 59SDS W662 84FT TH S69DEG 57MIN 11SDS E535 20FT TO WLY LN OF SD RR R/W TH SLY ALG SD R/W LN TO POB EXC RD AND EXC THAT PTN THEREOF LYING NWLY OF THE SELY R/W LINE OF SCHAFER ROAD AS RELOCATED Section 32 Township 25 Range 44 Source of legal Tl.tle Cbmvanv - From Oountv Fleoords Assessor's Parcel No (see tax statement) 45321 9103 Property size aporox 100 , OOOSFfpntage At)prox 450 Feet on Schafer Fba~i Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor 735 aere -agross rd Street address of property approx S 3600 SchafPr If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your lnterest in it? Hold title Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property none ALL OF THE FOLLOyVIING QUFSTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED ` 1 What are the changed conditions of the site area which you feel make this proposal is warranted? a clisadvantaaed parcel not well suited for sinqle fami.lv develo_nt. nor fazm land 2 What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? It will buffer the ad-lacent pronerties from the Rail Road tracks and near bv oommrcial developrrnnt This section of the application will provide the Planning Department's staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation wich the agencies identified Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department \ sw > r✓ • . APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION PAGE 2 1 COCJIVTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our re ments r submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied /D lq 40 (Sig ature Dat 2 MjJNTY =ITIES nFFIM A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone av bee sa fied The d gnated water purveyor for this site is 4•'#3 ~--i~-qo (S gnature) (Date) 3 W ATER PjEVIEYOR a) The proposal (is)(r9wmK) located within the boundary of our service area b) Satisfactory anangements (Jimm)(have not) been made to serve this proposal clovHesfiG c) We (are)(afteast) able to serve this site with adequate~water 10~1 1990 ( ignature) (Date) 4 BUTLDING AND SA.FETY DEPARTMENT ~~VY A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied This proposal is located in Fire District No (Signature) (Date) 5 COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal The applicant has been informed of our requirements and standards (Signature) (Date) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PROPOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFTCATION, OR IF NOT THE O R, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM D NER RIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF Date lqo 4~t,Y llNpsn e d ) . i`~•ort%~A's•F`'~ S 3~d~ SCo~'-eY dr s Ifaa4~e Phone 3 3 ~ .Q ~ ~ • e~ ~o ~~.-P . C.v o-,e~x4 zip o ~ ' • ~ Y Date .9~e'S 1, ~ ~i /7 i ~ • 4g~ APg }0 SEAL , SIGNATURE 0 APPLICANT R ENT ~.•~L. , Date KEV 4 9 fcu ~ Number S P 0 K A N E C 0 U N T Y E N G I N E ER P R E L I M I N A R Y C 0 N S U L T A T I 0 N--- , A. Project Name 4::~_: PROPOSAL Number of Parcels• Section ~ L T. 2_):~- N., R. E.W.M., Quarter 1 2 3 4 DEVELOPER Name or Address. AGENT Phone • Business (:~7 2- ! ~ Lp Q Home Name : ~e_ 'd e- c ~ k OWNER Address : S 3 r or. Phone. Business 2.G 3a; Home Name ~ 'S 0~~'5 ~ ENGINEER Address Phone: Business Home B. PRELIMI2IARY CONSULTATION. Date /D //7/ qd By. Preliminary a) RLght-of-Way 7 Conditions b) Curb f? c ) Sidewalk 71 d ) Pave e) Approaches 4L~-~,,~ D e ~ f) DZsinage ~/e / g) SCaCe/City Review Yes No ~ Remarks. NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulations for Roads, Ap-proach and Drainage in New Construction; Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended. Conditions are preliminary and may change after field in- ¢pectiqp gqd zqyiaw gf Gougy xggArdoq , C. INSPECTION DaCe. By: Remarks : D. SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: , i Fee Paid• Yes ✓ No Amount $:ZQD 00 r a h Check 411~ Planning Application Signed: Date ! O / J9 / 9 O BY •1 ~ 5►~~~n~ E. FzxAL Pz.AT cHEcxs Fee Paid Date Amount Check Cash Mathematical & Surveying Checks• No. 1 Date By No. 2 Date By No. 3 Date By Additional mathematical and Surveying Checks• No. 4 Date By Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. No. S Date By Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. , No. 6 Date By Fee Amt.&Dt.Pd. No. 7 Date By Fee AmC.&Dt.Pd. 1/81 h z REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH 132~ OATE INVOICE DESCRIPTION COMMENT AMOUNT 10/17/90 Repp, Emma ENGINEERING FEE 200 00 TO1AL 200 00 REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH u s BANK OF WASHINGTON , 13 2: S 3606 SCHAFER ROAD SPOKANE, WA 99206 SPOKANE WASHIN(3TON 98206 9158 1323 19 10-i250 10/17/90 $$***#x200 00 OATE AMOUNT Two Hundred and PAY Spokane Co Engineerzng TO THE OROER OF Spokane, WA 992 C 7 ~ 11100 13 ' 311' -1: L 2 5000 10 Si: LL67 3 L0 3 3 1n' . , . . . - - . _ . . _ ~ r : . , ~ , - . ~.e~.i . ~ . , . . ~,or .e......_ e,._ ..~..c.a _.-.1~..., o._._. ~ ~ ~ 7C • t t . ~ N F ~ O R OAT~ " J a R CEIPT U M B E ~ ~ RECEIVED FROAM QqgQg~~~ ~ o Add ress i gY - O ~ . ~ ~'2 '~$80OLLARS $ ZU~~• o FOR N ~ ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID ' y eECi►vNirvc I ~ I cAsH ~ I G BALANCE / ~ AMOUIYT y PAIO CHECK I ~ Mwae iN u S.A. BqLANCE ~ I MONEY 3 o w~tw,alonas ises DUE I ORDFR BY ~ - ~ w _ . - _ • y: •-~r. ` - - _ _ - ~ _ ~ ~ _ . _ . t~,"~.~i.~.«.r.. . w,k'fN _ r,4 f,r ~ • ~ t r ~ ~y+ r . F J 7 ~ ~ p'1 7 ti K ~ r ~ ~ z xf ~ a e C r d~ r DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS" WAC 197-11-970 and Secaon 11 10 230(3) SPOK:ANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE FILE NUMBER(S) ZE-46-90, VE-89-90 DESCRIPTION OF PROFOSAL Zone Reclassif'ication from Agncultural (A) to Urban Residenaal-12 (LTR-12) APPLICANT Redeemer Lutheran Church South 3606 Schafer Road Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 926-6363 LOCATION OF PROPOSAL Generally located in the Spokane Valley east of and adjacent to Schafer Road and approxunately 350 feet southwest of Ihshman 1Vbca Road in Secaon 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington LEAD AGENCY SPOK:ANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPART1ViENT DETERNIINATION The lead agency for this proposal has deternuned that it does not have a probable significant adverse unpact on the environment. An Envuonmental Impact Statement (EIS) is LUirequired under RCW 43 21C 030(2)(c) This decision was made after review of a completed envu-onmental checlclist and other uiforniation on file with the lead agency Ttus uifoimation is available to the pubhc on request. This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2), the lead agency vsnll not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below) Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., December 18, 1990, if they are intended to alter the DNS. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL WALLIS D HUBBARD, PLANNING DIRECTOR By Tun Lawhead, Planner II Phone (509) 456-2205 Address Spokane County Planrung Departinent North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 ~ DATE ISSUE67 1990 SIGNATURE / O RBGARMG ENVIRCNNENTAL UCNCEPNS ARE ATZHE HIFARING loollitillil APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260 The appeal dea.dhne is the same as the above project's appeal deadlule, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the projecG This appeal must be wntten and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objecuons Contact the Planning Department to assist you with the specif'ics for a SEPA appeal This DNS was mailed to 1 WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2 WA State Dept of Health 3 Sgokane County Health Distnct 4 Spokane County Engineer's Off'ice 5 Central Valley School Ihstnct -356 6 Fum Ihstnct -1 7 Spokane County Water Distnct -3 8 Spokane County Air Pollunon Control Authonty ~ t SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APpL,[CATION FOR ZONE RFCLASSiFICATION Date October B, 1990 Application No Zl'- qtP -90 ~ V E SOI - / ~ Name of applicant Pedeerrer Lutheran Church Strect address of appluant S 3606 Sc-hafer Raacl City Spokane State Wr Zip Code 99206 . Phone 926-6 16 3 Namc of property owacr(s) Re(JUgM~r Lutheran Church Authorizcd agcnt rcprescnting owner (if other than ownec) J. Grant Person (phone 623-1000) Existing zoning classification Acjr1cu1tural ~ Date existing zone classification established 1959 Exisung usc of propcrty Vacant Proposed zoac classification UR-12 Proposcd usc of propcrty Elderly/ retl.rement Apartsnent Leg al desCnptiOD Of pr0pCrty PTN OF E~ OF NE~i DAF BEG AT INTR OF WLY R/W LN OF OWR&N CO RR R/W AND I~nTLY R/W LN OF OLD SHAFEFt RD TH SWLY ALG SD R.D R/W 24UFT TH NSyDEG :36MIN 42SDS W448 48FT TH N30DEG 11MZN 30SDS W475FT TH N30FT TH N42DEG 35MIN 59SDS W662 84FT TH S69DEG 57MIN 11SDS E535 20FT TO WLY LN OF SD RR R/W TH SLY ALG SD R/W LN TO POB EXC RD AND EXC THAT PTN THEREOF LYING NWLY OF THE SELY R/W LINE OF SCHAFER ROAD AS RELOCATED Section 32 Township 25 Range 44 Source of legal Title Qo=anv - From Cbumtv reoords Asscssor's Parcel No (see tax statement) 45321 9103 Property size atmnox 100 ,OOOSFfpntage Ap-pmx 45Q Feet on Sc-hafer Bad Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor 74 acre -wross rd Rpro,x, S 3600 Srhafer Street address of propcrty a If you do not hold title to thc propcrty affected by this application, what is your incerest in it? Ho Please list previous Planning Depanment actions involving this property none ALL OF THE FOLLOWIIVG QLJESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED 1 What are the changed conditions of the site area which you feel make this proposal is warranted? a clisadvantaqed Paroel not well suited for sinctle fam~~y develoxxnent, nor faxna land. 2 What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties*7 It will buffer the ad-lacent properties from t-hQ Rail Road tradcs and near bv comnerc.ial develomie..nt. This section of the application will provide the Planning DepaRment's staff with written verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation wich the agencics identified Results of the preliminary consultation should be incorporated in the proposal before final submittal to the Planning Department ~ . ~ ~ APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PAGE 2 = - - C~ 1 COLJIVTY ENGINEER'S OHTCE A prcliminary consultation has bcen held to discuss the proposal Our rc mcAts , r submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied 4 40 (Sig ature Dat 2 COUNTY UTILTTIES OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requirements for submittal of this proposal for rezone av bce sa ficd Thc d ated water purveyor for this site is ~•#3 ~ (S gnaturc) (Datc) 3 WATER PURVEYOR a) Tha proposal (is)(mw%vst) locatcd within the boundary of our scrvice arca b) Satisfactory arrangements (A~)(have not) been made to serve this proposal dom es-rc c) Wa (are)(sftftst) able to serve this site with adequate~water /990 ~ ( ignature) (Date) 4 BUII.DING AND SAFE'I'Y DEPARTMENT l' V y A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal Our requiremcnts for submittal of this proposal for rezone hare been satisfied Th,s proposal is located in F ' e Distnct No ~ 1 "Ir (Sign ture) h(De) 5 S.'OUNI'Y HEALTH DISTRICT A prcliminary consultation has becn held to discuss the proposal The ahcan:t has 4eginformed of our re uirements and standards ) (Date) I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SVVEAR UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ASOVE RFSPONSES ARE MADE TR Y AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OVVNER OF RECORD OF THE SITE PROFOSED FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, OR IF NOT THE O R, ATTACHED HEREWTTH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM D NER RIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER BEHALF .,~►.WY~~' ig n e d ) ~ . Date O Phone ~ 2 6 G 3 G 3 ~ ~ _ .s. zip o ~ . A ~y~. ~ x~ '~}71 Y Datc •.,FS % , ~P~;.. c~ ~7r ~i~sF.AL SIGNATURE 0 PLICANT ENT 9 ~ , . Date REV 4 9 4~ fcu ~OFFICE OF THE COUIVTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COU[VTY, WASHINGTON December 3, 1990 To Spokane County Planning Department (Current Planning Administrator) From Spokane County Engineer's Department Subject Conditions of Approval Zone Change No ZE 46-90 Applicants IVame Redeemer Lutheran Church Section 32, Township 25 N, Range 44 EWM re Zoninq The following "Conditions of Approval" for the above referenced zone change are submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee for inclusion in the "Planning Report" and "Findings and Order" of the public hearing scheduled December 20, 1990 Prior to the release of a building permit or use of the property as proposed E36 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Schafer Road for right of way E40 Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer E43 Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage and access plans E44 The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased E45 A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles r~ y page 2 E46 To construct the zoadway improvements stated herein, the applicant rnay, wxth the appraval of the County Engineer, Join in and be willing tca participate in any petrtion or resolution which gurpase is the formatYan of a Road Improvement District (RIQ) for said irnprovement gursuant to RCW 36 88,, as amended spokane Caunty wxll not participate in the cast of these improvements This pravisian is applicable to Dld Schafer Road and Schafer Road E97 As an alterraative method of constructing the raad improvements stated herein, the applicant rnay, with the approval of the Cour~ty Engzneer, accomplYsh the road improvements stated herein by joining and participatzng in a County Road Pzo)ect (CRP) ta the extent of the rec~uired imgzovement. Sgokane Coun~y will not pa~ticipate xr~ the cast of these imprnvements This provisivn 15 applicable to 5chafer Road and O1.d Schafer Road E48 The construction of the raadway improvements stated hereYn shall be accornplished as ag~~ovec~ by the Spakane Cour~ty Engineer. E50 The County Engineer has designated Typical Raadway Sectlon Number One, Lacal Access standard f or tne Ymprovernent of OId Schafer Road which is ad)acent tv the proposed development ThYs will require the addition +af 8-10 ft. of asphalt Curbrng and sidewalk rnust also be canstructed E50 The Caunty Engineer has desigrtated Typical Rvadway Section Number One, Secandary Arterzal standard for the improvement Qf Scha fer Road wh ich is ad iacent to the propased deve lopment This wY11 require th~ addition of approximately 4-6 ft of asphalt alonq the frantage of Che development CurbLng and sidewalk must also be cvnstructed E51 Alz required impravements sha1l conform to the current State of Washingtan Standard Specifications foz Road and BrYdge constructivn and ather applicable county standards and/or adopted resolutinns pertaining pertaining ta Road Standards and Stormwater Managemer~~ in effect at the date of canstructionr unless otherwise appraved by the Count,y Engineer E~ 3 The appl icant sha ll constx uct a paved and de lineated approach (s) to meet tl~~ existing pavement an Schafer Road and Old Schafer Road page 3 E55 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plari requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal E56 This plat or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer"s Office as having stormwater runoff problems Since this plat or development proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, property owners should participate in the planning and implementation of a future basinwide stormwater management system The following "Condition of Approval" shall be required That the owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to 3oin in any county approved Stormwater Management Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, construction, maintaining or operation of stormwater control facilities E57 That the regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed development is affected by a flood hazard zone A development permit shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance 80-0726) E58 No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer E59 All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer E59 Applicant shall sign and record Spokane County Notice to the Public No 6 which specifies the folloWing The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which petitYOn includes the owner(s) property If a RID is formed by either the petition or resolutlon method, as provided for in Chapter 36 88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree (1) that the i - • page 4 improvement or construction contemplated within the proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation ot the RID and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of the RID by either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW This provision is applicable to Schafer Road and Old Schafer Road E61 The County Arterial Road plan identifies Schafer Road as a Minor Arterial The existing right of way width of 60 ft is not consistent with that specified in The Plan In order to implement the Arterial Road Plan it is recommended that in addition to the required right of way dedication, a strip of property 5 ft in width along the Schafer Road frontage be set aside in reserve This property may be acquired by Spokane County at the time when Arterial Improvements are made to Schafer Road r Roadway Data Existing Right of Way Schafer Road 60 ft Right of Way width after dedication - 65 ft Width of improved Roadway 36 ft Type of roadway surface asphalt Functional Classification---- Secondary Arterial Special Conditions County Engineering has reviewed this proposal based on an elderly housing concept Should these apt units be constructed for a occupancy other than for elderly housing further review of road improvements shall be warranted , 406 ~ , v . ~ ~ _ , - 1.- . . ~ c - ~ - ~ " Var4>-Jj _ 'Vr~v .,.~-r' , ~~~Q''~(~,`.t~ bL~' . . tJ- ~ - ~ S~ . 000 - _ ~ i ~ t,,%. _ ` . ~ • ~ ~ , .r ~dL~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . • Z, . lJ ~~A.~v~ ' • `''`.r ~ ~ ~ . ~ , ~ ~ - - ~ e~(,13- 6z~-- a~ . , - . ~ ~ ` ' ' • LAr, / . . `i a~'~.1t•.. ` ` - ~ . C~~`x ~ ~ • ~ • , . ~ . ~e . . . . U00 . . O1 r ~2..^~f~; •N FA..~v . . . ka- ~ v , co rv b ~ Sc.v s s ~ ~ . ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT REPORT TO SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE• December 20, 1990 SUBJECT Rezone No ZE-46-90, Zone Reclassification from Agncultural (A) to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) Vanance No VE-89-90, To vary the building setback requuement from 55 feet firom centerhne to 45 feet from centerluie on Old Schafer Road I GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant Redeemer Lutheran Church 3606 South Schafer Road Spokane, WA 99206 (509) 926-6363 Agent J Grant Person 4221 South Hollow S pokane, WA 99206 I.ocation Generally located in the Spokane Valley east of and adjacent to (new) Schafer Road and approximately 350 feet southwest of Dishman 1Vhca Road in Section 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County Washington Proposal The request is to develop 34 retirement apartments The proposal includes a 10 foot building setback vanance request to allow the building to be constructed within 15 feet of Old Schafer Road nght of way The front yard setback requirement is 25 feet from the property hne or 55 feet from the centerline of the street, whichever is greater II SITE ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan category for the site is Urban The Urban category provides for residenaal densities up to 17 uruts per acre The following Decision Guidehnes from the Urban category are apphcable to the proposal 1 1 b Higher density developments such as mula fanuly should locate with direct or near duect access to the major artenal systems rather than on intenor neighborhood streets 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 4 » . 1 3 3 All urban development proposals should requue public sanitary and storm sewer systems or intenm sewer systems to protect water quality 153 Sidewalk facihties wffl be requued along artenals connecting residential areas vvith commuiuty facihaes and/or commercial areas 155 Paved streets and street lights should be requued in Urban density developmenL The proposal is consistent wnth these guidehnes The site is also locateri inside the Pnonty Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Arterial Road Plan The Artenal Road Plan designates (new) Schafer Road as a Mmor Artenal wnth a suggested nght of way of 80 feet The exisang nght of way width is 60 feet The County Engineer has requued dedication of a 5 foot wide stnp of land along Schafer Road In addition, a 5 foot stnp is to be set aside as a future acquisition area Zoning Exi~,r g on SITE The existmg zoning was estabhshed as Agncultural (A) in 1959 When the new Zoning Code is implemented in January 1, 1991, all existmg Agncultural (A), and Single Fanuly Residential (R-1) Zones would be zone.d Urban Residennal3 5(UR-3 5) To ~gi NnRT,H The property is zoned Agncultural (A) To tgSOUTH The zonulg is Agncultural (A) and Single Family Residennal (R-1) To ft EA,ST The property is zoned Agncultural (A) To the WEST The property is zoned Agncultural (A) and Single Family Residential (R-1) Land Use Exi .~ing on SITF; Currendy vacant. To the NnR T Church To ft NnRTHEAST Railroad nght of way and vacant land ST Single family residences To the AST Single family residences 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 5 =46=90 V =89=90 1~ v > ~ T;~rj. ~ ~ r ~ • • ~ , - J 7• (1)4 , r.. 1 11-110 ~ . 4, ~ r i.5 9 3✓ ~ ~ c " ► ~ _ _ ~ o ~ i r r % • iR'T~,'3ir A,= 9~6-~7h►~ ~-r-y= r► r ~ v~, ~ ~(r o '1 •g • i~t f' ~ ~ rY ~ ~ t ! • a ~ ~ t { a! \ ~ f ..L, ~Ar ~~~r7 • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J R ( 111 11 ~ t ~ , ~ ~1V1 + r A I / a~'~ ~ ~?JPy ~ ~O • ~ ,o ~ / 1 ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ / t ~ '~a ~ ~ "~♦~`1,~ ~ 2 12 124 , 76 ~ • ~ ` ~ ~ ' ~~O ~ ` L _ ~ ~3;~L~ •T °p v1 ♦ ~ r ' : O o>• ~ O re r 1 44s /tt. - ^ ~ o ~ aa ~-~A:.- ~ , p ♦ ~ oJ, \ ~ If 610 . ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ . Q ~ Q 76 a ' \ ~2 - /2 67 ~ ~C) ~ R-! 13-7s ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ ~ - - " , ~ - r v 1 :~k A A ~ • ~ ~ , . ~ ~ ~z 6~ ~5 " ~ ► t ..~a~ .~..,4 ~ - - - + ~ - ~ • ~ ~ ~ A~ Ff~ ~f 0 - ~ " ~ 4 ~ / % ~ ~SA ~ ~ 0 ~ ,b•v~ "~"w`~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ J p f ~ • = R(~ , /~l y • 2 ~ ~ ri. . =~A S-i w - 79 72 ~ a O //f M ,R _ G, 1 ~l . . ~ ~ . ( 7 ' ~ ~ ♦ ~ ~ 9 ~ or6i ad ~ • < ~ ~ ~ ~f~/ O Q ! ri d PONORA • ~ P/ C S p ~ ~ ii --~j•~ ~ o- I _ ~ I2 67 M% C4 9 ' ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ' ReJ ~ - ♦ 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 2 N N \ lD C) ZONING FILE NUMBER VARIANCE FILE NUMBER = RAILROAD m c-) . , - . , ~ _ • , V) s' 4 c~ a ~ E (D o o , • , -s , A 11 . , r+ I , --1 % (10) UNIT WING ~ (12) UNIT wING 0 r '1 i ~ • N t v m ~ c ,p 1 (12) uNit wiHC . p Ol I ' ~ ~ E Z o 7 ~ a 9 ` _ I p 0 o COMA10115 AREA . , \ ~ ~ A / ~ < . ` K . \ y b ~ rOCy • \ , T , ~ ' 1 y ~ 1`',~ PROJECT INFORMATION u r~ 9O EXISTING ZOHE EST 1959 -AG VROPOSED 20NE U R lt I T E 9 AREA 12E E00 S F 7 908 AC 1 ~ _ IT~~i~+~ r w P S BUIlDINO COVERAOE (MAA 00%) 401 , 1 OPEM SPACE eu r ouo 110\ PE0U1RED PARKIHG LO ~,~r ~ ( 1 S a J! UNITS ) 61 (D ~~~l~J^; SITE PLAN Pp0Yl0E0 OB W lJ t a< <a I ta NT Of 91OG5 23 y C nIlV yAr va0n09E0 l UPdi ELDERLY HOUSING },V~1~ ,►oKA„f w ~ ~ Site Characteristics Site Sizg Approxunately 2 9 Acres Existing B^ uildin,gs None Topogma,y Flat Vegetanon Grasses Flood Hazard Ared The northern tip of the site is within the 100 year flood zone No building is proposed within the flood hazard area Proposed Site Plan Uag 34 retirement apartments Pronosed Bui1di= mulnple family structures Buildhn; (s) Footnnnt Area approximately 30,000 square feet Site Coverage approximately 25 percent Maximum Structure HeiQht 25 feet Buildi g Setbacks PRQP,,~SED REQI1IRED Front Yard Schafer Rd 65 feet from centerline 55 feet from centerhne *Front Yard Old Schafer Rd 45 feet from centerlune 55 feet from centerline Side Yard (R) 67 feet 5 feet Side Yard (L) 10 feet 5 feet * Vanance Requu-ed a kang 51 34 PIbD Se(~ B f~f nng TSphniaues Type III see through buffer landscaping is requued along all lot hnes except for dnveways Five foot wide planang stnps are requued in the side yards Twenty foot wide planting smps are required along Schafer Road and Old Schafer Road Type III landscaping consists of a mix of evergreen and deciduous shrubs, trees and ground covers Qthpr Site Pl r~onslderanoni Old Schafer Road, a dead end street, lies adjacent to the site's eastern boundary The proposed multiple family structure extends to within 15 feet of Old Schafer Road and 45 feet from the centerline The building setback requuement is 55 feet from the centerhne The sponsor has requested a vanance to allow construcnon within 45 feet of the centerline of Old Schafer Road 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 6 II.o t e The site plan subrrutted for r+eview by the Hearmg Examiner Committee is general in nature Detailed review to determine compliance with all Ordinance regulations and conditions of approval is recommended to be admuustraave and to occur at the Building Pernut stage III SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Density The proposed density is 117 dwelling units per acre which is wrthin the maximum density permitted in the Urban Residenaal 12 (UR-12) zone Buffering The proposed type III landscaping along all property boundanes meets the requuements of the zoning code The proposed landscaping wdl help to buffer the adjacent smgle family residences from the parlang areas on the site Circulation/Access Pnmary access to the site will be from the dnveways on the (new) Schafer Road Parlang areas may also be accessed from Old Schafer Road The on site ftaffic clrculation design allows for direct access from Schafer Road to Old Schafer Road This design eliminates the need to use Mercy Dnve through the single fazruly neighborhood to access the parlang area from Old Schafer Road Stormwater Drainage Compliance with "208" storm drainage standards is required Sewage Disposal The Utilines Department has required the proJect to connect to the public sewer system Water Suppiy Water wdl be supplied by Spokane County Water Dismct #3 Fire Protection Spokane County Fue Protecnon Distnct #1 will review fire flow and fire hydrant plans pnor to issuance of building permits I V SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Envumnmental Checklist was subrrutted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Cond.iaons of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guideluies The Plannmg Department has deternuned that "No probable significant adverse unpacts" would result from the proposal being developed and has issued a Determinjdon of NonWnlficance, ("DNS") The "DNS" was cuculated to eight other agencies of junsdiction and other agenciesJdepartments affected by the future development for review and comment The "DNS" comment penod ends December 18, 1990 and was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners wnthin 400 feet of the proposal, and by noace on a sign posted on the proposal site The 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 7 Heanng Examiner may consider addihonal envuonmental related testunony at the pubhc hearing V PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY The proposed renrement apartments are consistent with the decision gwdehnes of the Comprehensive Plan The proposal is also consistent with the design standards of the Urban Residential -12 (UR-12) zone, except for the builduig setback requirement from Old Schafer Road The site is unusual in that it features two front lot hnes This fact does restnct the usable area of the site sigruficantly when both front yard requirements are apphed Since Old Schafer Road is a dead end smeet wnth very light traffic granting the setback vanance will have relattvely little unpact on the public and adjacent propemes The Planning Department recommends approval of the rezone and vanance as condinoned V I CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL 1. All Conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the "Applicant," which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, heirs, assigns, and successors. 11 The zone change applies to the following real property That portion of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 descnbed as follows Beginning at the intersecnon of the westerly nght of way line of the O W R& N Company Radroad nght of way and northwesterly of the nght of way line of Old Schafer Road, thence southwesterly along saud railroad nght of way 240 feet, thence north 59°36'42" west 448 48 feet, thence north 30°11'30" west 475 feet, thence north 30 feet, thence north 42°35'S9" west 662 84 feet, thence south 69057'11 east 535 20 feet to the westerly line of said railroad nght of way, thence southerly along said nght of way line to the point of beginning, except road and except that pornon thereof lying northwesterly of the southeasterly nght of way line of Schafer Road as relocated COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1 The zorung map shall be changed to Urban Residential-12 (UR-12) after appeal penod(s) have expired and all development shall comply vvith Urban Residential - 12 (UR-12) standards 2 Approval is re,quu-ed by the Plannins Duector/designee of a specific hghting and signing plan for the descnbed property pnor to the release of any buflding pernuts 3 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Planning I?uector/designee shall be subrrutted with a performance bond for the project pnor to release of building pernuts Landscaping shall be 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 8 uistalled and mauicauied so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impmred 4 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance wnthin the concept presented to the Heanng Body Vanaaons, when approved by the Planning Duector/designee, may be permitted, including, but not lunited to budding locaaon, landscape plans and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All vanations must conform to regulations set forth in the Zoning Code for Spokane County, and the onginal intent of the development plans shall be mauitauied 5 The Planning Department shall file with the Spokane County Aud.itor, wittun the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposiaon, including lapsing of appeal penod, a Title Noace, which shall generally provide as follows "Pnor to the issuance of any building pernut for any bwlding or any use on the property descnbed herein, the apphcant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Secaon 14 706 (Aquifer Sensinve Area Overlay Zone) The property which is the subject of this noace is more parncularly descnbed as follows That portion of the E 1/2 of the NE 1/4 descnbed as follows Beginning at the intersecnon of the westerly nght of way line of the O W R& N Company Railroad nght of way and northwesterly of the nght of way line of Old Schafer Road, thence southwesterly along said railroad nght of way 240 feet, thence north 59°36'42" west 448 48 feet, thence north 30°11'30" west 475 feet, thence north 30 feet, thence north 42°35'S9" west 662 84 feet, thence south 69057'11" east 535 20 feet to the westerly line of said railroad nght of way, thence southerly along said nght of way line to the point of begulnmg, except road and except that pornon thereof lying northwesterly of the southeasterly nght of way line of Schafer Road as relocated, in Section 32, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane Counry, Washington 6 The Planning Department shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in quesaon is subject to a vanety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use acaon This Title Noace shall serve as public notice of the condiuons of approval affecang the property in question The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or m part, by the Planning Department The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows The parcel of property legally described as (legal description) is the subject of a land use action by a Spokane County Hearing Body or Administrative Official on December 20, 1990, ,mposing a variety of special development conditions File No ZE-46-90, VE-89-90 is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Planning Department 12/'90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 9 COUNTY ENGINEER'S OFFICE Pnor To The Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use ()f The Propg,ty Aa Pm2gsed 1 Apphcant shall dedicate 5 feet on Schafer Road for nght-of-way 2 Access pernuts for approaches to the county road system shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer 3 The apphcant shall subrrut for approval by the Spokane Counry Englneer road, drainage and access plans 4 The applicant shall subrrut for approval by the Spokane County Engmeer and the Spokane County Health Distnct a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the enare project, or pornon thereof, if the development is to be phased 5 A parlang plan and traffic circulaaon plan shall be subrrutted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer The design, locaaon and an-angement of pariang stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineenng pracnces Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer, will be requued for any pornon of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles 6 To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be wilhng to participate m any pention or resoluaon which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) for saud improvement, pursuant to RCW 36 88, as amended Spokane County vvill not parncipate in the cost of these improvements This is apphcable to Old Schafer Road and Schafer Road 7 As an alternative method of construcang the road unprovements stated herein, the apphcant may, vvith the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road unprovements stated herein by joining and parncipating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the requued unprovement Spokane County will not parncipate in the cost of these improvements This is apphcable to Old Schafer Road and Schafer Road 8 The constcuction of the road unprovements stated herein shall be accomplished as approveri by the Spokane County Englneer 9 The County Engineer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, L.ocal Access standard for the unprovement of Old Schafer Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development This will require the addinon of approxunately 8- 10 feet of asphalt along the frontage of the development The construcaon of curbing and sidewalk is also required 10 The County Enguieer has designated Typical Roadway Section Number One, Secondary Artenal standard for the improvement of Schafer Road, which is adjacent to the proposed development This will requue the addiaon of 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 10 approxunately 4- 6 fe,et of asphalt along the frontage of the developmenL The construction of curbuig and sidewalk is also required 11 All required unprovements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specificanons for Road and Bndge Construcaon and other apphcable County standards andlor adopted resolutions pertaimng to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construcaon, unless othervvise approved by the County Engineer 12 Applicant shall construct a paved and deluneated approach(es) to meet the existing pavement on Old Schafer Road and Schafer Road. 13 Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and dranage plan re.quuements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution No 80-1592 as amended and are apphcable to this proposal 14 This subdivision or development proposal is located within a drainage basin which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer's office as having stormwater runoff problems Since this plat or development proposal is affected by or is a contnbutor to stormwater flows, property owners should pamcipate in the plammng and unplementanon of a future basinwide stormwater management system The following statement shall be placed in the plat dedicaaon "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to join in any County-approved stormwater management program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through pubhc heanngs for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design, construcang, mauitairung or operaaon of stormwater control facilities " 15 The regulaaons of the Naaonal F1ood Insurance Program shall be observed smce the proposed plat is affected by a flood hazard zone A development pernut shall be obtained from the County Engineer before construction or development begins within any area of the special flood hazard zone (reference Spokane County Ordinance No 88-0521) 16 No construction work shall be performed within the existing or proposed pubhc nght-of-way until a pernut has been issued by the County Engineer All work witlun the public road nght-of-way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Enguieer All requu-ed construction within the exisang or proposed public nght-of-way is to be completed pnor to the release of a bwldlng pemut, or a bond m an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construcaon of improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer 18 Apphcant shall sign and record Spokane County Noace to the Public No 6 wtuch specifies t.he following The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authonze the County to place theu name(s) on a petinon for the fomzaaon of a Road Improvement Distnct (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) properry, and further not to object, by the signing of a ballot, the 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 11 formaaon of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36 88 RCW, which resoluuon includes the owner(s) property If an RID is formed by either the peution or resoluuon method, as provided for in Chapter 36 88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree (a) that the unprovement or construcnon contemplated wYthin the proposed RID is feasible, (b) that the benefits to be denved from the formaaon of the RID by the property uicluded therein, together with the amount of any County parncipanon, exceeds the cost and expense of fonnation of the RID, and (c) that the property wnthin the proposed RID is sufficiently developed Provided further that the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the nght, as authonzed under RCW 36 88 090, to object to any assessment on the property as a result of the unprovements called for in conjuncnon wnth the formation of the RID by either peution or resolution method under Chapter 36 88 RCW This requumment appues to Old Schafer Road and Schafer Road, from which the subject parcel takes access 19 The County Artenal Road Plan identifies Schafer Road as a Minor Artenal The exisnng nght-of-way width of 60 feet is not consistent with that specified in the Plan In order to unplement the Artenal Road Plan, in addiaon to the required nght-of-way dedicauon, a stnp of property 5 feet in width along the Schafer Road frontage shall be set aside in reserve This property may be acquued by Spokane County at the time when artenal improvements are made to Schafer Road 20 County Engineenng has reviewed this proposal based on an elderly housmg concept Should these apartments be constructed for an occupancy other than for elderly housing further review of road improvements shall be warranted COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1 Apphcant shall make connecaon to public sewer system Sewer connection pernut is required Plans and specificaaons are to be reviewed and approved by the Utlhties Department COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Sewage disposal method shall be as authonzed by the Duector of Utilines, Spokan,, County 2 Water service shall be coordinated through the Duector of Utihties, Spokane County 12/90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 12 3 Water service shall be by an exisung pubhc water supply when approved by the Regional Enguieer (Spokane), State Department of Health 4 A pubhc sewer system will be made available for the project, and individual service will be provided to each lot pnor to sale Use of ind.ividual on-site sewage disposal systems shall not be authonzed S Use of pnvate wells and water systems is prohibited COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1 Requuements of Fur. Ihstnct No 1 need to be satisfied dunng the bwlding pernut process SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1 Au pollution regulations require that dust errussions dunng demoliaon, constrvction and excavation projects be controlled This may requue use of water sprays, tarps, spnnklers or suspension of acavity dunng certain weather conditions Haul roads should be treated, and enussions from the transfer of earthen matenal must be controlled, as well as errussions from all other construction-related acavihes 2 All traveled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean 3 Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces If traclang or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces 4 SCAPCA Regulauon I, Article V, requues that a Notice of Construcuon and Apphcation for Approval be subrrutted to and approved by our agency pnor to the construcnon, installation or estabLshment of an air polluaon source 5 Debns generated as a result of this project must be disposed by means other than burning sam REV4/90 mo 12/'90 HEC Staff Report for ZE-46-90 Page 13 L~ FAX TRANSMITTAL -M# ~:~'~;~~,~~.1;'.1 ' • : • .+:.;:i'w.~;_~.,, . SPOKANE COUNTY :7i.~:.. 'i:~~: : ~ i,1~.J'. .j• i• _ j ci'. I~c~ii;•' ~ a •I t~''PF i:f,f ' . ) ~~'~:~'"•,:~1,, ,e Y' .4~ •'N,Ii.uf.:': cOMMIsstontERS" oFFrcE r. ~r•]"~•~ ~~:r~. ~ p'•y.; r'.i, `,.;5 . ~,'~~''v, `'.~~'v .s:~; • W. 1116 BROADWAY • . • 'l~l~~., ~ r; ~ f.J ,,~Cd~'~,ny~;'i~~ ~;if:~. ' . N :7.:~ ri • . .~~.y~ j;~~ ~-f ,~:~,r:.i,~,;: . r~~ ~ ~ ~ SPOKANE, WA. 99264-0140 ; , PNONE {509} 456-2265 ~ FaX: (509) 456-2274 . i~' ~ 4 • . '~,t: •'•ir,?YN~~~v~~: . ' • :'4r t:: t.:~:~~r?.i .Y~;~,:;:: :n A E ~ Sp~Jw4NC CAtJklr C4VRT HOU6; • TOs NAME: C4M PANY: DEPARTMENT: ~ FAX N U MBER; FRQlVf: NAME: ~ PHONE: . . rOYAI_ pAGCS lNCLUDING THIS COVER: DESCRIPTION OF MA'fEFitAl: DELIVEFiY INSTRUCTIONS: H1GH r!IldRl7Y - L?E'LIVER 1MMEOlA7'ELY ~ PE.EASE CONFIRM RECEIPT igY nPN4N& nFAX 0 PLeASI! ArSPOND AT YOVR CONVtENCt COMh4CNTS: Z 0' d WdbO : Z T 66 Z`2 Nd.C OdS J,l I -iI lfl : Ol S~lWWOD A1ND 3Nd710dS : WMl_-J ' e RECE! r ED oEC'z ~ IM '1'0 iHE 60AR0 0f CdlJNTY COM,N I S5I0"1ERS ~P~[Y ~t~~ce!0~`'.~► ApPeal Fee - $140.40 od Ta ' s Ua te Name : . Y . . r. Address: Zia Cade: 4- C► , BUGjnt?SS Ph011@i ~ .f+l~~~..~.~~~~:J ~ j~~>•~V~~ Nome PhonE:_,_ Flrar•ing Examiner Conmli ttcc*Action Beinu Awe-a1 erl ~ /?v:.~-f' C`~f ~l~r?j~. l> .~/C-. ~ l-'•- - ~ l~`°~(~`'~~`a.`_~ Ti-tl e : __e y4 vv.~. ~ ..4- Pr~l irninarv vubdivi.sion ^lurnber:,. Zo np. . RNC:lcssification PtuviDefs - Da te of Haar• I ro~ Exami ner Coftmi tLee flc:tian : v 5ignatur.e: t ~ Siol~at~.,r.G aP Au'thorize:l Rep~•es:e~~tative; -y.,r.4rilt-E' itiddr.ess P 1~1;v-llv'~v '!OUR REA5t1NS FOP. APPEAL . t- /Nl~ y7i~a f - J6~ f2.7 f .~'.S lJ t-. /~'cr' ~ y Q - - • ~ f!_ 1 l/~^~. ~ ! ~~~ci ~'''rk"3 / .J • /_~l.i.~1c~~J Ni a ,~':G~ .~~~'~~'t/ ° •L ~ ~ ~ OFF I GE U5E ' PII~Y C4uies to ~ E . ~lanni,~' Eiii~itteN_ws_' knv11^.Orlmer~#;dl NEaltli _ 7 . ~ Fce. Received.: Chec-1, Cesh Reeeipt ~lumber'~-;~-~•;3 Ncarirtg Uate: z0.' d WdSO:,7- sE6T •E Nd!' Od5 . f~l 1, 1 I 11-I : 0! 56WW0D A1N3 3Nd7f0dS : Wi7JA , . . 200 Residential This section summarizes triP generation (orall As expecled, tl7e single-family detacl7ed unit types of residential.awellings. Each catcgory of has the highest generation ral-e per unit of all residEntial housing, particularly single-ramily resident:ial uses. This is foIlowed by aparL- detached housing and apartments, used data ments, with retirement communities having from a wide rangc of unils with varying sizes, the lowest rate. The rate Eor planned unit cie- price ranges, lacations and ages. Con- velopments, which has a mix of single-fam-ily, sequently, therecould be as widea variaLion in detached units and apartments, is in bet%veei1 trips generated withi.n each category as tliere is these two ty►pes. Single-farnily detached unics between different categorie.s. As expectcd, have the ~.iighest rate because: 1) They are th-c dwelling units Lhat evere larger in- size, more largesi units in size and have more people and expensivc: ar Far-ther away fTOm the central more vehicles per unii than any other lypes; 2) Uusiness clistricts had a higher trip generation they are gecierally located farelier away from rate per wzit than t,hose smaller in size, less ex- shopping centers, emplayment areas and other pensive or closer to the CBD. However, other attractars than are other types; and 3) they factors sucly as geographic location in the have fewer alternate modes available because coun[ry and type of adjacent and 'nearby de- they are not as concenri-ated as other types of veloprnent also had an e£fect on the generation units. rate. Thus, only the above 'general sralement (instead of some linear relationship) concern- ing size, cosr anct location of dwelling unit and , k6e incomE of the oceupant could be made. Summary or Rate Tabies of the DiEferent Types of Dvuelling Units. Type p f Dwelltrzg Unit Average 14/eekclay Vehiclc Trip Erids per Unit Average Maximum Minimum 210 Single-Family Detachecl Housing 10.0 2-1.9 4.3 220 Apartment, Gerieral 6.1 12.3 0.5 221 Low-Rise Apari ment 6.6 9.2 5.1 222 High-Rise Apartment 4.0 6.4 1.2 230 Condominium 5.2 11.8 0.6 240 Mobile I3ome 4.8 7.6 2.3 250 Retirement Community 3.3 _4.9 2.8 270 Planned Unit Development 7.8 14.4 5.8 Rev. 1982 1 • • , 220 Apartment Apartments in this analysis include both low- Trip Characteristics: The mcasured correlation rise or "walk-ups" and high-rise multifamily coefficients are shown in the table. dwellings Incluaed in this categoiy were all the studies that did not spec~fy the typ~ The average weekday vehicle trip generation was measured at 6.1 trip ends per apartment (height) or apartment studied. An apartment is unit. However limited measuremcnts made defined as a rental dwelling unit that is located since 1979 indicate a generation rate of 5.4 within the same building as at least three other vehicle trip ends per weekday per unit. As with dwelling units. Examples of this category are fourplexes and all types of apartment build- single-family dwellings, Saturday generation is slightly higher and Sunday slightly lower. ings. See the following tables. Data were provided from 115 different studies of apartments having an avcrage size o£ 267 units. The average development density was 21 7 units per acre with 2.1 persons per unit. The average automobile ownership was mea- sured at 1.3 vehicles per unit. Equations and Correlation Between Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends (AWDVTE) and the Independent Variables for Apartments. Equations and Independent Varcables Correlation Coejficient (R) AWDVTE = 263.2 + 2.433 x Number of Persons 0.975 _-134.9 + 5.508 x Number of Vehicles 0.963 = 68.8 + 5.853 x Number of Units 0.963 Acres 0.187 Units Per Acre -0.073 Rev. 1982 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Building Type A= artmenfi ITE Land Use Code 220 Independent Variable-Trips per Average Number Aveiage Size of Trlp Maximum Minimum Correlahon of /ndependent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 2.8 71 Peak A M. Enter 0.08 i 1 ~90 Hour Between Exit n 2 n i - of 7 and 9 Total 0.29 0_52 ~ 4_30 Adjacent P.M. Enter 0.23 1 11;24 Street Between Exit o, l4 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.41 0.77 n n Li 4 u icz Peak A.M. Enter 0.08 Hour Exit 0_20 ~ iq~:)o of Total n• 29 n-52 0 - I 0 3,q 4-N Generator P M Enter 02~ i 9 Exit n-i h Total ~ n - 41 n 77 ~ ---j~ ~ Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 25 - _ Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 1 7 I1)17 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0 _ ? E G-h qli 7 Source Numbers -2-, LLt 95_4 6: 4, 10. 11. 12,. 1 ~ 14, 16, l q20. 24 ~ 35. 40, 72. 108 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1 q 7q. R Pir_ 1 4 R2 , SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RAYES Land Use/Building Type Apartment ITE Land Use Code 220 independent Variable-Trips per Vehicle Average Number Average Srze of Trip Maximum Mrnimum Correlatron of Independeni Rate Rate Race Coefficient Studies VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 5.1 8.6 2.9 63 360 Peak A M. Enter 0.1 1 Hour Between Exit 0.2 1 of 7 and 9 Total 0.3 29 Adjacent P M Enter 0.2 1 Street Between Exit 0.1 1 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.4 42 Peak A.M. Enter 0.1 1 Hour Exit 0.2 1 , of Total 0.3 29 Generator P.M. Enter 0.2 1 Exit 0.1 1 Total 0_ 4 4,; Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total I S Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends + 2 R Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total 0.3 Source Numbers S, 6, 1 1,9i 13 , 14, 16 , 19 ?0_ ?4, 34 , 35 , 40 , 72 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: October 1, 1975 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/8uilding Type Apartment ITE Land Use Code 2.2C1 Independent Variable-Trips per Dwellino, ilni i: Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate RcVe Coefficrent Studies Variable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 6. q.~ 115 --2-E7 Peak A.M. Enter 0.1 0.1 0_.0 21 24 h Hour Between Exit n_ 4 n~ n i 9 11 n of 7 and 9 Total n _c; 1_ n n i 7 u 9 i~ Adjacent P.M. Enter n_ h n _ R n ~ 9 Li 1; 1~ Street Between Exit n_P nr; n ~ 95 ID Ll 7 Traffic 4 and 6 Total 1 n 7 i~ n 1 00 'D ,7 Peak A.M. Enter ~ 0.1 ~ 0.1 0.0 ~ 17 ~;)60 Hour Exit 0.4 0.6 0.1 18 P C; p of , Total 0.6 1.0 0_1 Rp 2 1~ Generator P.M. Enter 0,4 08 n_~ ~ ~ 2 1~ r) Exit 0(1.~ n_l P1 4 r 3 Total n_7 1_ h n__ 1 Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends R Li Peak Enter - ✓ ~ Hour of Exit n i Generator Total n Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 7 1; , 7 IJ Peak Enter Hour of Exit ~ _ . . Generator Total ~ Sou rce N u m bers P.} Tl n,~11T12T l~T.l 1 6.7 1 Q 2 ? ti 0-,, - ~ 314-5 4.0., 70 inn inR I , , ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: June 4-., 1975. Rev. 1982 221 Low-Rise Apartment This category includes apartments in buildings that are only one or two levels (floors). An example of this is garden apart- ments or suburban apartments. Twenty-txvo studies contained dataon low-rise apartments. See the following tables for the measured trip genei•ation data. ~ Rev. 1982 SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land Use/Buiiding Type Low-Rise Apartment 1TE Land Use Code ~)91 Independent Variable-Trips per Dwellina 1Tni f- Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Mrnimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coetficient Studies VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 6. 6 9 I.D A li Peak A.M. Enter 0.1 0,~ 0.1 93 911 Hour Between Exit n_ 4 (1 _ 7 n 9 03 211 of 7 and 9 Total 0.5 0.9 . 0.~ ;)n4 Adjacent P.M Enter 0.4 0. 6 0.~ ;)1 1 Street Between Exit 0.2 0.4 0.1 Pil Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.6 0.9 0.4 24 Pn 4 Peak A.M. Enter 0.1 0.,R 0.1 ~ 4 Hour Exit p,!} 0.7 p it ~Uc; . of Total 0.6 0. q ~!i i Generator P.M Enter 0.4 06 n~ aLi ' U~ Exit 0-2 0-4 n_I ti ~ti~ Total n 7 n 4 nq 01 00Q Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends 7 . P 4 _ P !1 !1 Peak Enter n~ nh n i Hourof Exit p, ~ 0.4 0.2 20 2 1 Generator Total 0.6 0.8 0._~ 21 __22$___ _ Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends 16.1 1 8.8 1 4.;) 1 21 2 2 R Peak Enter 0,~ 0.7 ~ ~ p ~ I Hour of Exit p,~ 0.1)_ 0. 1_ Pn Pl I Generator Total 0_ 6 72 _0~ 8 Source Numbers 11, 21. 71. ()8. 110 ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date 1()82 l • . • 222 High-Rise Apartment High-rise apartmc;nts arc in buildings thrce or more levels high. Only four studies contained trip generation data, as summarized in the fol- lowing tables. Data Limitations: More data for both daily and peak hours are needed to differentiate between high- and low-rise apartment trip generation. Rev. 1982 ~ . ~ SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RATES Land UselBuilding Type Hi ~h -Ri sP Ai ar#-mPnt. ITE Land Use Code P9P lndependent Variable-Trips per _-Di3rtP 1 l j n rr TTn i t- Average Number Average Size of Trip Maximum Minrmum Correlation of lndependent Rate Rafe Rafe Coeflicient Studies VariablelStudy Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends ~ n I; Li I~ Peak A.M. Enter q...I q~~ ~ 37-9 Hour 8etween Exit __0,2 3w~ of 7 and 9 Total p,'~ 0.9 0.2 ~ 4Q6 Ad jacent P.M. Enter 0.2 0.1 0.1 2 '17 9 Street Between Exit 0.2 0.2 0.1 2 ~ 7 9 Traffic 4 and 6 Total p, 4 0.9 0,~ 4 4 Q.b Peak A.M. Enter Hour Exit of Total Generator P.M. Enter Exit Total Saturday Vehicie Trip Ends ~ Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total _ Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers qq, ? R , 9R , i n q . ITE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 19 ?r- RAl► igRg , Caution, limited sample size, use carefully. ~ . - ~ . 250 Retirement Community Rctirement communities-restricted to adults or senior citizens--contain residential units similar to apartments or condominiums and are usually self-contained villages. They may also contain special services such as medical services, dining facilities and some limited supporting retail facilities. Only five studies conducted in the San Fran- cisco Bay Area contained trip generation for these communities. The average weekday ve- hicle trip generation rate measured entering and leaving the communities was 3.3 vehicle trip ends per dwelling unit. See the Eollowing table of rates. , . 1 , , SUMMARY OF TRIP GENERATION RAYES Land Use/Building Type Retirement Community ITE Land Use Code 250 Independent Vanable-Trips per Dwelling Unit Average Number Average Srze of Trip Maximum Minimum Correlation of Independent Rate Rate Rate Coefficient Studres Varrable/Study Average Weekday Vehicle Trip Ends 3.3 4.9 2.8 5 R.14 Peak A.M. Enter Hour Between Exit of 7 and 9 Total 0.4 0.6 0.2 S R34 Adjacent P.M. Enter Street Between Exit Traffic 4 and 6 Total 0.4 1.0 0.3 S RU Peak A.M. ~ Enter I Hour Exit of Total 0.4 0.6 0_ 2 5 RU Generator P.M. Enter Exit Totai 0_ 4 1.1 n.~ Saturday Vehicle Trip Ends + I~.6 I ~ ~ I s Q-4 ¢ Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Sunday Vehicle Trip Ends $~34 Peak Enter Hour of Exit Generator Total Source Numbers R. l n fTE Technical Committee 6A-6-Trip Generation Rates Date: 1,9 7s 4~ z~ l ~ ~ s C~o t 0 ~ cc VN~'l _ P,@ P4 L) ~G ~ oF V, 7'/ - pr/ Y`'~ I U~ 1 ~ ~.r-~ ~ A~~~ S pUA,`1. ' Wt Tt-~ s 15 r7 ~ (..v~ E~- m~ ~ - SC- 1~" ~ ~r'j, ~ ~ j ~N ~AJC 4Z C, VJ ID Y~A • ~ ~~L-~ 04, rLP`'"J - e>~ ~~L ~ ~ Lc~ oo T 4 c.~ L"} rz- ~ N 6 . C&I--' , ~0 2 S t 40>C- t/V\ ~ us~~7 C,D v L"0 Q , GoJ~~f l~ ~O T 0 r t ~~C~_`~ - jitJ ~v ~,c/~n rv N .✓Co ~C.C1 pt761 ~ At~r rLO ~Z ~ G_ ~ P, gL. ,v 1,0j~-►~"~"~ 6-q _ ,o~t cc~~ a ,~~~6 P e~i D C c1 l 5 ~ P/1-00 l2c r,&c N.31"w-,19 elo ~,,C_ S ~ s-c~-- - T ~ ck r~ v ,4ra, ~ (40 ~e, s oF ~ ~ t 9 i 5 P~'`~ J ~ 430 .----J-' o s. CO,, L - L e u&-''' C'.Err`~ s~.t c I~- • ~ t t .Aq 0rTo,vs P-ftqpt Q co''' ,05;A 124 t~~ ~ j ~ ~ J ~w~s ~ t 7o C.- 'T . p. /✓~to S<~~ I~~`~~,, s'~ ~r~r.~ ~o t a s~ G5 ~ ~ 00 G~ rps C& n~ ~ ► , CLJ IIA6LCY ~A.) r 5~~ co E~?i ~AL A -.~rP~ M Ez~y _ /q,7$ ~ s - ~ ,,o ~ 1 ~utt~" o ~ ~ . Ctwn.c.*A tID C~o r.^,? LO~ D ~ Sc~ 04--D ~ vT ~ AY3v ~ c0 1 ,,i ~~t~ f ~ p~,D►~~ ~ 0~ ~ j r 6z, o j f~ /A a r /1 i 1ID,'`"-1,!'''~ t3~=~~``J r,✓~ , c..~ sar~--~~ c c - ~ L u ti W t u' OT PI't..o ~ hj° t i~.~ ~ y,n~ L..J(z c) ~1 c~ A.~-~~.. -o 12 ~v y\A , KK ~ - .r• ,.~w~... ~ ..r' y . . ,.r.-. ...,,,r-.- A~,,,,~ri•-- r _ - :•~+r'I'^` - ~rt_y~i...~~. • +~~M1 . _ .r M- ..w"~ ..-r.-r""~- " ~ ~ . ~ .~'~~~,..r.r"'~`.- y y ~,~,,,r-• . ..A^.~+ln" . - i ~ T- ~ ~V ` 0 ~ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230 [1- SPOXANE,sFlfYIR010lENZAL ORaIMJYKE ~ . , (YAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) 1 Envlromnental Chetklist Puryost of CMckllst: F11e No. The State Eevfronmental Do11cy Act (SEPA) chapt*r 17.21C RCH. requlres all qoverrmntal agenctes to conslEer the envlrormental tmoacts ot s proposal before mk1nq Aetislons. An Envlronwental Impact Stateaent (EIS) wust be prepered tor ell proposals with proDable slynltttant adverse 1mpacts on tAe awllty ot tAe envtronnent. Thr purpose ot this checklist ts to provlde tnformtion to help you and the &9ency ldentlty tmpects from your proDosal (and to reduce or •void imqacts trom tAe proposal. if 1t can be done) and to help the aqency declEe whether an EIS 1s requtred. Instructlons for Applfcants: This environ.ental checklist asks you to describe soae Das1c intormetion aDout your proposal. 6overmienta) agencies use this checklist to detersnine whether the env/ronmenta) laqects of your proposal are slgnifitant, requtrin9 preperatton ot an EIS. Answer the questlons briefly. with LRe most DrKise lnforuatton knoMn, or give the best descriptton you can. You .ust answer eacA questlon accurately •nd caretully. to tAe best ot your knw ledge. In most cases, you should De able to answer tAe questlons frow your own oDservattons or projett plans vltAout the need to Afre experts. If you really do eot knoti the •rnwer, or 1/ a questlon das not apply to your proposal. vrlte •do aot know• or •does not apply.• Caqlete aMwers to the Questlons ncw wy arold unnecessary Eelays later. Soat Qvesttons ask a0out qovernwentsi ngulations, such as =oninq. sAorellnt. and lardmark desl9nations. AmMer these Questlons it you can. it you Aaw proptews, the governwental agenttes can assist you. TAe checklist questions apply to all parts ot your proposal. even if you plan to do tAea ovtr a perlod ot tlme or on 0ltferent parcels of land. Attach anr addittonal tntoemtton tM t w11) destrlbe your proposal or Its envlronnental ettects. T1u agency to v1+1cA you suDmlt CA/s checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide addlttona) lnformattoe nasonaply Mlated to eete►aining 1t there way be slqnltlcant adverse lmpact. Use ot checklist tor nonprojtct proposali: Coaplete th/s checklist for nortproject proposals. even thouqh questlons ieay be ansMered 'does not apply'. IM AD01TI0N. cwplete the SUDPIENENTAL S1iEET FOR NONPROJECT 11tTIONS(Part 0). For nonpro,fect actlons. the references 1n the thetkllst to tAe wrds 'project.' 'appllcaM end •prope►ty or slte' sAould be read as 'proposal.• 'proposer.• and 'affected 9eographic area.' respectively. A. BACICGROl1l10 1. '1me of proposM proJect. if appiicable: ~Pj:4('rn l./l & ke-40-al VlWaTe 2. Mame ot Applicant: Ra-e-Pn~~i 771,eVGqjj6 `_/jrw c--/, ' 3. Address and phone numper of appl tunt or contact person: .T, G- e Q/.Lf Pei- 50 4PIL . 5. 4f2z l o - SPok4T&-,r " (aSA.. a04~ 623-loo0 ov 72k -o/bo 4. Oate checklist prepared: 7 l q0 s. Aqencr reQuesttng cnecktist: PfL'irrss i sl 9 12-e ~T 6. ProposeE tfainy or schedule (including phasing, tt applltable): ' / 7• a. Oo you hsve any ptans tor futurt addittons. expansion, o► turther activtty related to or comerted with thls proposal? If res. explaln. "hLfr~ b. Oo you mw+ or have options on land nearby or sEjatent to tA1s proposal? It yes, explain, `iav ,~i~- ,ec A& ~C s'~' ~ ~ S ~.~-t.~• 8. llst any onriromiental intorwatton you knor about tMt hes b4sen prepared, or vi ll De prapared, dtroctly related to this proposal. Rev.2/1/88 ~ 1 '1,0v1uC 277-11-160) Eeetian 11.10.230(1) , sPOTAUR A. lACKCROQAa (contlawd) 9• Oo 7ou lmev vtwclws appliutions &~odias for =ownwncal appcovals of otler propo"la dir*etly atfectiat che property eovered by rour pcoposal! Lt Tts. trplsin. 10. List aay govecnmot approvsl& or persit• thai vill be needed [or your proposal. !f Imo..n. / 11. Give a eriet. camplete descrlption of yan[ propoael. lncludiag tlr propox*d we• and tM •i=e of ttti project •nd site. :'Mre are sevaral Qurstioos Lte[ ia chi• clreklist that ask you io descsibe eertaia upects of your proposal. You do not nmod to repmt those answrs on this psse. AroQ4~~' ~ J La~ ~ o~.~- ' Lv 42LALIZ~yeS' o~ V" a4.• eL 3o To 3 L44 . 12. tccacion of tl+e proposal. Cive su[tleleat tAIOT1itL00 tor a persoa to uoderstaod the precise loutloa of your proposed projeec. including a •cevet addcess. !i any. and seetioo. tovyhip aod raoge, !i knovn. If • propo"l vould oecur owr s raage of area, provtde the range or bonadaries of tl+e •!te(e). Provtde • letal desetiptfon. •!te pLn. vlciaity mp. •e►d toposrapAie "p, iE raasonably avaiLble. t1!►ile yw should submit aoy pLos reQuired by c!u aaeney. rou are not nQuired to duplicat• sap• or detailad plana submicted vich any perolt applicacion reLted to thls cheeklist. S e -ef jL400- ,.yC ae&lop, SO "-z05( ~ L1' ~I -~f~.s t !'r-C~~G ~T- ~~2.I iJ Q~~/ /~O Q /v!~ / / /fCta. ~ ~%9f1 L~JQ,/r ioo~ 13. Does the proposed actioa lie vithio tl+t AQulfer Seerltiw Area (IISA)' °!ie Ceneral Sever Secvlee Area' :Ae Prlorlty SeMer Setvice Area' :Ae City of SpokansT (See: Spokaae Couaty'• ASA OverLr 2oM AtLs tor eauadarles). "0 Et COlPLl!LD bT APR,ICAHT 6. [NVIItOR`Q1P'.AI. Q.QQ.YfS Ewalwtion For Agencr Uee Only 1. eruR-n a. Cenesa2 descripcion of tlr slte (elrele one):~S rolling. hilly. steep slopes. nouatainous. o c I+er : b. 'Jhsc is cM steepast slope on tl+e •!te (approsiaate poccent •lope)'. c. '+1+at general type• of aoila ace toaad oo the •ite (lor eualple. eLr. sand, aravnl. paat, muct), If rau kaor tAe eLsalilutioa of agrienltusal soiL. •poeifr tAes acd note ary prim tanLod. d. Akee there surtace lodicatioes or hlstoe7 of uestable wi L le tha lmneElate vicini:y! it so. descriDe. 2 , • ~ 'SPOKANE E11YiR0}QKMTAL OROINAlICE ` (MAC 197-11-960) Stttlon 11.10.230(1)' S. ENYIRONIENTAL ELEMEKTS(tontinwd) Evaluatton For ' AqfnCy Utf Only Cescribe the purpose, type, and approximt• qwntltlti ot any t1111ng or q sd1n9 propo d. tnatcsu :ource ot tttl. /~/j, h e v ~ t-~~ d. r. 9 ~Qy L:Iu i C} 9L ~c~ r~ i~„ _9 /a vi c etQ f, tould eroston o aur as a result ot clearing, construction. or use7 It so, qenerally descrlbe. Prc_lo ckb ly g. Ilbout what percent of the s1te v111 ee cortred rtth tmQervlous surfsces atter ro~ett coMtrut- tlon (lor exaaqle, •sp►+alt or bui141nqs)? h. Proposed .easuns to reEute or Control eroslon, or otber 1mpscts to the terth. if any: ~Y ~ Iii~ ` ~ ~ ~-e~ 2. AIR a. Yhat type ot emissforts to the a1r vould result fram the proposal (1.e.. dust, autaaobfle. odors industrlal. wood sooke) during tonstruttton and vAen tAe profett is coepleted? if any, yenerally destriDe and gfve approxlaate quaetltes 1f known. JOL4 ; ' 9 Lc Cvo~Mucs;r..e.c1r - S on, ~~k d~e ►sc e`J: -e 4E~t~e.~S S: a ~-r s eQ~~~ 24_2:r~• - b. Are there any oit-slte sovrres a~iss ons o odor t at wy affect rour proposal'► It so, : generally descrlbe. ~O c. Proposed arcasures to redute or conKrol emisstores or other irtpacts to air. 1f any: 9'Ya S,$ 94- 3. WATER _ a. Surfacc: Ili ts there anr surfece water eody on or 1n tAe 1rweAlate vicintty of the site tncludlnq year- round and seasonal streass, saltwter, lakes, poeds, wetlands)? It yes. de uribe type and ' provide Mys. If approprtate, state rhat stream or rlver tt tlows into. SaA2L-4 SfiajvitAZ e's P,•,°,,t~ u,,,L.Q 44-,) e~~. ~.s. .1~,~: r~ r o-v sS rZL-e/..~' ~ T.~ c~~' ~ Tlrt _&'oYASQ,~ (2) Mil) the projed requtre any wrk aver. 1n. or •djacent to (with n Z00 teet) tAe describcd vaters7 If yes, please descriD• 4nd attach avatlable plsn:. ~to 1 e c4- S) 101-e Z o0 o~ ~c~ eclo CcJe 3 • ' • ~ A~"'yiA~ ~ ('aAt 197-11-960) Seetion 11.10.270(}, N-1 m 1. flIV1R0l1lQNlAL [t.DMMr"9 (continued) Evalwtion ►oc . k.ncy u.. onlr (3) Lotimt• the aaonnt ot till and dradse mterial tAac wuld be ylaesd !a or cesond tcom the suttac• vacer or wcLnds and indiute the ara oi the •!te that vauld Ee aitecteE. Ladieat• cM sourat ol till mterial. ' s-ea.sQ '-Lal Q'-LA~ TAx t4eo (4) Vill the proposal reQuire suctac• water vithdcawls or diverslonsi Ciw a Zeneral deserip- cioo, purpoae. and approxlaate Quantities. !t knwn. ~ T 'LS 14 L7i C i O41,~c.~. (5) Doe• the proposal 11s vitAia a IOG-peor tlood plain" If so. aote locatioe oa the site plan. Tb-e M0 Aelcvl',h~evky 7LLP oY Th.c ~Orq&4,~y ~ 1-or-C,izJ-,E,ge (:QW• 'C& i6p,6o Y.ecir__~/ooc7' 4-v ,ea, (S) Does the proporsl involw any diselarZe• ot vut• oatsrlal• co sucface vacerat If so. deserlDe the t7Pe oi wste and aaticlpated voluoe oi diecharse. b. Ccound: (1) Ytll groundvater be vitAdrovn. or vlll vster Ee dleeharged to gcoundvater• Glve general descripcion. putpose. and appro:iaate Quantltles, if {eiorn. (2) DescriDe vasto oaterial ttsat vill M diseharged inco the aroued fram •eycie tasilc• or other "oiter7r vaite crqwnt iacility. Oaseribe the general •ize of the sysces. the nusber o[ Rouse• to Ee •erved (if applieaple) or c!►e aumQer of persoro the sysces(s) are expected to eerve. P r o S-e c-~ t,v," • (3) Desetibe aay srstems. otM r thsa tl+oss dssigned for the dispo wl oi sanicary vasta. installed tor the putpose of diochargins [luids belov the ground suciaes (lnelude• systeas sueh as those for the dispoeal of storm vatet or drsinas• Erm floor draleu). DascriDe the typa ot ~qeces. the asoun[ of mrterial to De dlsposed o[ tArough the systes and tM [ype• of satsrlale likely co be disposed of (includina materials vhieh oay eater the syst e laaEvercently chrough npills or Ak• • result of ficetiQhcin= aetivicien). ~r{' .lL..T ~ ~ TD ~ LZy..~~ S 777Y N1 jOS . ' (i) Yill aur chaieals (especlallr organie solvent• or petrolsuu fuels) be •cored in apova- =rpund or uadet=round •toca e tanluf If so. vtut type• aod quantitias ot oaterials vill De stoeed' , 4 / trorr►NZ gXvUrMa" oILDtHANZ i (Wnc ir-ii-'bo) s.uio,+ u.io.iwcl; ' 3. LNVfRONlg1RAL EUDffif!S (lOAL1mtld) evaluatlon Toi I .nn u.. o~r Ag (S) % VAat proaetiw masures vill be talun to iiuure tlut l~lu or *pilla of aar eMsleals •tor*d or wsd oe •ite vill not M•Ilowd to parcolat• to stouoQvatet (thi• laclude• eusure• co kNp eMulcals out of dispossl •rsteso descriDed l0 7p(2) aoe1 3e(7)1 Qss &-2~ T S~lcs or u s-f cy~o__ - Q 7yi ..w 77,0, u., -Miri ov ei vri oct..~ ~s tv~t 4.Y-P'a~- c. Vater Runotf (ineludicg •toc9 vacer): (1) Describe tAe •oureo ot nmo[t (loeluding scors vatet) and aet:wd ot collection and dispowl i[ any (leulude Quan[ities, it known). WMre vill thi• water tlovi Yill chl• water Ilov lnto other vaters? Ii so. descrlbe. /~~y~': .a Q~4 ~ (2) Uill soy cMaicals pe •tored. handlsd oT wad on cM •ite in a loution vhere a •pill ot leak vill droin to surtace or aroundvator or to a stots water dispoaal srstm dtsehar6lna to suriace os grounA.wcor? 421-7, (3) Cauld vaaie mcer1a1• ea[er grouad or surfue vatersT If ao. 6antrally descti0t. l d. PTOpokd musure• to reduce or eonttol surfaee. scwnd, end tvno[t water ivpacts. tf anr (!t t the proposed utioo 11e• vithia cM Aduifer Seeuittw Area De esDselallr eleat oa exylawciona r relA[!eg to tat111tie• cooternlai Saetiona 7D(4). 30(5). and 3c(2) of thie checkliet): y. Pt.&,\S a. Teck or cicclt trpt ot vegecacion tound on cM •ita: declduoua tree: alder, oaple. aopen. ocher. everareen cree: fir. eedat. pine. other. ehsubs. _~grais. puture. eTOp or Sraia. vec eoil pLots. ca[tail. Euccereup. Dullrwh. stuak cadDaQe. other. water plants: water lilly. ea1Qcana. silfoll. otAer. POO, ocher cype• o( veRetatioa. (,t,/% /a/ (N.QQpXyG~ D. VAat Iciod aad aaouat oi w=etation vill De sesowd or alcered! ~ -S-dzl2d c. List threatened or eudaagtrod speeLes lmovn to Dt on or e►ear e!►* site. ~ d. Proposed landscapin~. us• o[ oative pLets, or otArr ~easuns to presern or enAaac• w=eLation oe ch• site. ii anr: S . ' ~ svOcM ErnVIRWMKrAL oRninuNCE ~ ~ e. fIIVIROlIMEhT1lL ELdiE11'1`5 ~contlnueal fvoluitian Far S. J111I14ALS ' AgehCy ll3! QAly A. Circle any hirds and antasrls whici+ haMt 6een oDsertrad oe or niur Tt+e site or art knorrp ta br cn or neir the s1Lc: birds: #rk heran, eagle, sangbirds. other; . MRmra81#: deer, beart elk, 6eartrF csther' f1sn: basa. salmon, trout, Rltiring, snellflsn. other: otfi rr ^ b. List sny threatened or endanqered speticS known to he on or near the s1te. do ►llo t C. Ls Oe site pari of a migratioit rou[e? If !a, explain. I~~I d. Proposed aeasti+'+as ta prestr+►e ort enriente tiildlife. 1f aoy: { r° ~ d3=r ~ 12_ZZ 1-0 J,- -'h ca 9« ENERGY M!D HA1URAL RESOURCES a. 11hat kints of efrrgy lelettf#c, naLural gas* xaod stare, salar) will be usad ta ve9et tiar the ccWarted project'i energy needs2 Re3tri6e rhether it x111 he ust-d fer hea ting, nanufac- turing. eItc. ~ . h. wauld your praject affect the pa#eot{a1 use of iOlaP energ,3F Dy 3djaCeM[ prOplrtiies? If sa, generally deSCri6e, c. What kiinds af enerqy canserrratian fratufrs are included in the plans af thlx praposa4? List other proposed masures to redute or tvnlrol enerqp tmpacts, tif anr: 7. EHY[RONliEllTAL 14EALT#1 a. Are there any tnxirornaental he4lt% haxards, includfng exposure to tcxit chemlcals* r#sk cf fire aind explcsion. spilT. ar hazar~tQUS waste, #hat could occur as a"sul# of this prapasal3 14 so, de9trxht. (a) Destti4e spetiel energsncy servita: thaL miqht be required. ~ ~ ~ • f •!l~.."d + . 40Y~iIC~ ~ . ~ t(YAt 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) 1. t'IVSROIQQIRA3. E3EM@1TS (eontinued) tvalwtion for . Aa.acp 0.. only tttVIR0m21Tf/1L tEAL:K (contioned) (2) Proposed wasures to reduee or control •=.troassatal hulth hasards. if auy: ~ • " b. Noise: (1) What t7De• of noise e:isc !o the are• vhich mar affect ywr project (for eusple: tra[fic. equtpaent, operatioa. other? (2) lfiat typo• and lsvels oi noise vould De cruted bp or aNOCiated vlth tM projeet on a sAort-teev ot a long-teeo Easi• (tor euample: trattic. conttuetion. o9ecacion. otAet)' Iadieate vhat ha►rs nolwe vould eost irom the site. tt 1 , '06- / wf- ~ / (3) YroposeE kasure to reduee or con[rol noise imputs. !f any: ` .9 ol dk.'%9_ 8. U`ID AND SHORELIf1E USE - a. What is the cusrent use ot che •ice and ad aeent . ~ Dropertie*• ' /J • ' ; ~C b. ltas the •ite Deen uaad for agrieulture' It •o. deactibe. c. Describe any structures on the sita. d. Vill any •trucCures be desolished! Ii so, vhleh9 ~Q e. What i• the eurrent soaing elasslficatioe of the aiteT /ff+SY/Gc~{ {ip,t f. What fs the current cmprehensiae pLn dom16oation of the •ite' g. 1t app1luDle, vtut 1• tAs turreni slareliee auter pso=ras deslgaaticn ot the •itel lor/ay' /Gqb~ h. !la• anr part of the slts Leen elawified u aa 'eavironmentally sensitive' arqt If so, specify. 1. Approsiaately Mv aany peoyla vmld resld• os vork in tM complatsd pro'ectT 4oo' o? ,576. 7 GTG[AM II17IMOMnJL OmIliAllCe ~ (VAC 197-11-960) S.etion 11.10.270(1, D. LNVIftOttf~1R~L L1.~QiRS (cootiowA) Lvaluation Iror 11geae7r Use Only Approaisatdly !wv aany psoplo would tlsa noaplated projaet dteplaeet k. Proyosed srsure• to avoid os r+duee dlspLesent lopaets. !f aayt 1. Proposed saaeures to •noure t!r pcopotal 1• eoopatibla vith a:isties sed peo}eetad Lnd uses at►d plans. if aay: . .Z,-r. . - ~ _ . c` 9. f10USINC A. Approxisately hov oaej umits would be ptoIVided it a T Tnsie~t• vfirtl►er higt+-. 1 Ir. or lorineom hovsioa. %2_0 b. Appro:l~tely hov maar uaits, it aey. would et elialwtedt InElute vhexMr hish-. uiddlr. or lov-latoN housiA;. c. Yroposod woure* to mduee or contcol housina irpaccs. ii aay: 10. AESTQETTCS a. Nhat i• t!r callest height of any proDosad •tcucture(@). aot ioeluding aetsnnasf Vhac is the prlacipal ezcerior Duildina sacarial(s) pcopostd! llelm,A~ / ♦ c12:~ /?aso 1, vy . /Q a oit c.v 1I/ dc • b. t11►at vievo in tM ia~diate viciaitr would be altered or oEstrucctdT 4M~ e'l c. Proposed seasure• to redues or eoattol aestAetic la9acts, if aay: ll. LIC1C' A.`tD CL.ARL a. 'rhat type of light ot gLre vill the propoosl produeiet 'fiat ti~ oi day would it sainlt oeeur• ~ w - or~ e. Could 11gAt or gLse trou t!►e tialsIwO projeet 0e a "tec7 lasard or intesfese vltR •ievst t / /i~i~•~ & f c. What e:isting otf-sits sources oI li=!ft or gLre sa7 aitett yws propovalt c ~ d_ * 40 d. Fropossd wsure• to cedue• or eoacrol light and glare lapeets, it aaps Li~1~lf~ • d gpORAPFL RIYIRON}QNTAI. ORDINAMCE ~ (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(K , , 1. E1NI110lOQ1RAL II.ZKNTS (tootlnwd) Evalwtior Tor k.acr u.. only 12. RLC1lLASION a. Vhat'desige►ated and laioeml tecrutionsl opporcuaitles at* io cM ismadisto dcinicyt D. Yould the pcopassd pcoject Eispl&e• snr esisting recreatioeul vses• If •o, AtKTSM. 0 c. Proposed wsure• to reduee or coe[rol lspsccs oa reereatioa. lneluding reereatiotil opportuai- tie• to b* provided bp the yrorec os applicant. anr: , ` . . 11. AIS'.'OAIC AtdD CULTCJ1tAL P1tZSL1tVATtON a. Ate there any place• or oDjaets liated oa or proposed tor er cioaal, atace oc local ptesena- tion ngiater• kmvo to Ee on or ae:t to the eiteT If so. 6entra117r deseclDe. 190 e. Centrallr MscriDe anr landw rka oc svtdance oE Rlacotte arcQaeolosiesl. u ientitic or cultural isportanea Imovn to E+ oa or nent to the site. ~Qa c. Proposed oeasure• to reduce or eoatrol lopaccs. if anr: ,~✓4 ..V 16. Tt,AtIS POR': ATION a. Identitr public streets and highvays servina the •ice sed describe proposed acces• to the existing streei srstes. SRoron •tts pLni, if any 141<4 1 b. I• •ice currencly merred by pu011c traaiit? It not. vtti t is the apqco:iaa~c,e~ d~iacance to the nearasc traaslt •top" ~ c. [tov esny parlclns spaces vonld the couplated projset haveT Hov aaery vould cl+e project eliminate' . ; p D.~~ • ~ d. Will the proposal nquiro aey aov rwd@ or screece. oc improverats [o esioting road• or screecs not including drivtvaysT .t so, genetslly deseribe (indieate vhetlur public or privats). e. Wtll the proj*et use (or oecur iu cM taasdiace vieinic7r of) vates. rsil. or air trsnsportation! I[ w , aeoerally descciba. . 9 . e ~ (VAC 197-11-960) Seccion 11.10.230(1) % MT'ORwlIL "LiAlRdMMlriw1. ORDI11AltCE l 1. LNVIROZQTM':AL LLDKEN'I'S (tontinwd) Evalwcion Tor ' Ag.acy u.. oray f Hov sany whleuL t trips per dar vould a genersced bp the eaepleted projeett it lmwm. indicace vhen paat vould occur. Av~u~ fi ^ g Proposcd sessures co reduee or concrol cransportation imyacts. if aay: eLLf ) TG.f-+r 15 PUELIC SEAVTCES a. 1lould the project eesult in an ineraased need for qublie •ervicos (for esample. fire proteetioe. police proteetion. Realth eare. schools, other)i I! •o. senerally descria. b. Proposed mp sure• to rsducc or coatsol Eirect iepact• on puelie •ervices. 18 aay: ' ~✓lLL.L~ - ~~"1.r ~ ~ / 114 v 1mr-e9 c. /al-, i 16. U'ILI:'IES s. Circle utilit currently avai L ble at the •ite: leetrlcit tural sm vace . refv •ervice, epfi . manltary sevec, •eptic srst a. ot G"v a~ ~ v~• ss ?"l~-t /P ~Q, b. DeseriEe the utilltie• tAat aro proposed tor the pm yect. the utilicy providiaa the •erviee and the gereral construetioo aetivities on the •ite or !a the ierdiate vieinity vhleh aiaht De needed. 1 ~ lilJ a S,P KS oo ~ {ie&. C. SICNATURL 1. the undersigned. svear undas the penalty of pesjusp cltit the above respoi»e• a~e "d• eruthiullr anQ to the bast ot mr ImwledQe. Ialso understaad thac. should thero be any villful nisrepreseatacioa or villiul Lck of full diselosure on ry porto t M a en my vitAdrav anr deterninatioa ot aotuiQn111eance cl+at it daht leaw !a reliance upon thls eErekliet. Date : Proponeet (Please PTiet or Type) Yroponent: ACdreu: JC, Z/ (S1 ture) ' PAone: /X O-~ ~<k .-'6 2 3 -/CZ,-v' Psrwn completiot fors: Ao ArlS ' Qats: l0& 7/90 P,one: ~-'OG ~ . FOR STAF. VSz MMT St.it .ab.<<., reri.~ing c►~ckli.t: 6ased on this •taff reviev oi the enM rons atal checklist aad otf+er pertlneAt lafotaatioo, the staif: / A. ~ / Gonelude• tAat thsrt are ao DrobaDle sianifi unt adverse lapaet• and recommaad• • deteninatioe of aono lsnifieaoes. B. Cooelude• tlyt probaele, •igeificsnt adw rse eovironmecal ispacts do *xist tor thw eurrea► proposal •nd reeowod• a aitigated deter mination oi noasigniileaaee vitb eooditiow . C. Cooclude• tAat t!►ere are probaDle •ise►ifieant adwrse aoH toaNntal iapaet• aod reeaoeed• a deteemioation of signltiesoee. •ILTf1C !LS - :73.00 10 , . . . ~ ! 1 ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11,10.230 -1- SPOKANE ENYIRONMEMTAL ORDINANCE (MAC 197-11-960) Settion 11.10.230(1) . • • • Environmental Checklist F11e Ho. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCU, requires all governmental agencies to conslEer the environmental iiapacts of a proposal before rnaking Aecisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must De prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse inpacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist 15 to provide inforsnation to help you and the agency identlfy impatts from your proposal (and to reduce or avotd impacts from the proposal, if tt can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. lnstructions for Applicants• This environrnental checklist asks you to describe sone basic information abw t your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environnental lmpacts of your proposal are significant, requlring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions brtefly, with the most precise inforraation known, or give the best description you can. You must ansrer each Question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should De able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hfre experts. If you really do not knoa the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal. write 'do not know' or 'does not apply.' Complete answers to the questlons now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Sone questions ask about governmental regulations, such as toning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can If you have probleRS, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questlons apply to ali parts of your proposal, even 1f you plan to do thein over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional informstton that will descrlEe your proposa) or its environnental effects. The agency to which you submit Chis checkiist may ask you to ezpialn your answers or provide addittonal lnfonnatlon reasonably related to deterr+ining if there may be signlfitant adverse impact. Use of checkllst for nonproJect proposals• Ccxnplete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even thou9h questions may De answered 'dces not aoply'. IN ADDITION, caaplete the SUDPLEIIENTAL SHEET FOR NOKPROJECT ACTIONS(Part 0). For nonproject acttons, the references in the checklist te the words 'project," *applicant.' and 'property or site' should be read as 'proposal," 'proposer.' and 'affected geographlc area,' respectively. A. 81lCKGR0UN0 l. 'lame of proposed project, if appllcable: _J? e 44 P~ ~ 2. 4ame of App 1lcant - /1 -f'•4'' J-i..l Ht. L-t 3. Address and phone number of appl icant or contact person• . ~ 4lJv t i :r 7.-- - f? % (c• 4, Oate checklist prepareC: S. Agency requesting checkiist- ~~I'~,~/~f~f i~L! ej~•~ /~T'; 6. Proposed timing or schedule (lncludlnq phasing, if applicable). .3~ / / 7 7. a. Uo you have any plans for future addltions, expansion, or further activity related to or cortnected with this proposall If yes, explain. A/Li b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this praposal7 If yes, explain. c2 ; ,f.,s ~/a t~ C ` ~i ~ t: ~r c ;T Y Z90,'1-2 c' - 7:4 -CV •S iv e-~.y.~I 8. List any environrt+ental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, dlrectly related to this proposal. (Yr3 c.~ 7'. C(. a...s Rev.2/1/88 ~ 9POlU1fE E?IVIRONlENfAL ORDINANCE (VAC 197-11-960) SectioA 11 10.230(1) A. 9AC1CCa0IIi7D (contlnued) . • ' , 9. Do you kaov vhecher appllcatlona are Dending for governmencal approvnle of other proposale directly affeccing the property covernd Dy your propoeal' If yes, explain. /j~0 10. Llet aey government approvala or peroita thac vi 11 be needed for your proposal, Lf knovn 11 Give a brief, completn description of ywr propoeal, lncluding the proposed uaes and the eize of the projecc and slce. :'here are several questiorte lacer in thie cluckliat tha[ ask you to describe cectain aepects of your proposal You do noc need to repeat those ansvers on chis page :-~v 1-~9o_`• ~T e C^~ v, ~LG iI" -~4~ ~ ~b~.• ri~' / 2~ ~ r d/H Lr~~~ l Y Gi'1~ {r'~ ~ t ~ ~,i I~zf t' ~ ' X ~s ~3z') %U 3 ~ v 12. Locatioo of the pTOpoaal. Give sutficienc inlormation Eor a person to underetand the preciee location of your propoaed project, including a etreet address, it any, and section, tovru hip &nd [snge, Lf knovn. I[ e proposel vould occur over a range oE area, provtde the range or Doundaries of the eice(s). ProvtAe a legal descripcion, •ite plan, vicinity map, and copographic map, tf reaeonaDly available. While you ehauld aubmit any pLana required by the agnncy, you sre not requlred to dupllcace msps or decailed plans submitted vtth any permit applicacion relaced co thia checkllsc % r _ 7~, d G l~i Gt 'L';4 T, / NL.C- L vit+' 1 i ~4 V ,t~ % •`i G;,.~' ~c Y . ~ 13. Does the proposed acclon lie vichin the Aquifer Seneicive Area (ASA)' 'he Ceneral Sever Secvice Area' The Prioclty Sever Servtce Area' -he Ctty oE Spokane7 (Sce Spokane Councy'e ASA Overlay Zone At1aa for boundartes) '0 BB COMFLE'.'LD BT APPI.ICAN[ B. FF9IR04TMN".AL ¢LEliEiTS Evaluatton For Agency Use Only 1 EAR:'ii a Cx::e^z'_ description of the elce (circle one):[tlla~~ rolling, hlLly, steep slopes, mountalnoue, o c he r vt%' b 'lhat is the steepeat elope on the slCe (approximate percent slope)' 1071, c 'fiat general cypes of soila are found on the alte (for example, clay, eaad, gravel, peat, muck)' If you knov the claeeification of agcicultural aolls, epecify chem and note uny prime farmland S~ .G r ~L. • . Cl/ti] .a ~C .c . % I ~ ~-C~• :r.-( d. kre cRere aurface lndicatione or hiacory of unatable soila in the immediate vicini;y? If so, describe i(,1n 2 , . SPOKANE ENVIROHNENTAL ORDINANCE (uAC 191-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) . ~ B. ENYIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(continueE) Evaluation For Agency Use Only e. DescriDe the purpose. type, and approxlmate quantitie~ of any filling or grading proposed. ~ Indfcate source of fill. iti~~h s~.f' o i l, f= eri t•- /L ~i V-- ` /lJ / H ALr et2..-1 f. Could erosion o aur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g, ADout v+hat percent of the site will be covered with inpervious surfaces after ro,~ect construc- tlon (for exarnple, asphalt or butldings)7 !~,j_?~~ A h. ProposeC mensures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any. 7~ ~~~J V ir ! ~ J L/r'V 'ica 2. AIR a. what type of emissions to the atr would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, auta+iobile, odors industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed7 If any, generaliy describe and give approximate quantites if known. n w v i N~ Ld s'~.c~ c,i. La:. C' v~ r~ , ~XX L-ll.( ( TL - ~✓ts,~~/ lsl~.1'~' 1 S ~C i 7~. G 7 . ~ C- ✓iZ s , j r C` . f _S' _p ~ v 1'11 <~,Vrs &e t r ti b. Are there any off-site sources erniss ions or odor t at may affect your proposal7 If so, generally describe. ~U /Lec► c Proposed measures to reduce ar control emissions or other tmpacts to air, if any: 1, uATER a. Surface. there any surface water body on or in the iinmediate vlcinity of the site including year- round and seasonai streams. saltWater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)7 if yes, describe Cype and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it florrs into. ~G v H ~ ~ f'Gt ..S cti : ~ t ~.~t ~ ~S ~r• i ~ ~ ) i ~ c ~y 1 LC..~ C'_ T' .G, C G2--i.L,eti. /.i C G•- ~ ~ S -,7i~i /L .S ~ (2) will the project require any rrork over, in, or adjacent to (with n 200 feet) the described xaters7 If yes, please describe and attach available plans. ro .i 4? c..J~' . r ~O~ ile-, 3 SPORANE ENVIROt7HU1'fAL OADINA2tCE (14AC 197-11-960) Section 11.10 210(1, . ' ~ B. ENVIRON!{ENTAL ELIIKEN"S (continued) Evaluaclon For Agency Use Only Eetimate the amounc of flll and dredge material thet vould be placed in or reeoved from the surfnce water ot vetlande and indicate the azen of the ei[e that vould be affected. Irtdicate the source of f111 materlal. ~fJ~ ~~-ti3t`% ~ Gf l-; s-•'Cr~ G-~' t-EZ•...4-, t J. ; (~C.y~ . -)'t-C4- . ;~-o- ~ • G~ (4) u111 che propoeal require aurface water vlthdravals or diveralons' Cive a oeneral Aesctip- tion, purpose, and approximace quantitiea, if kno++n _T T ij 1L-' (S) Does the proposal lie vlchin a lOQ-ye&r flood plain' If eo, noce location on the ette plan T 1-►_~ s ~ts~•.- /-li -e--w I ~ Ti l ~ L 6 C r.% / -r s( I ~-7~i:~• /C7 :i If''C~ p jt7/C50eP' Av f'e,, (5) Doea the propoeal Snvolve any diecharaes of vesce materiala to surface vaterat IE ao, dencribe the type of vaste and anticipated volume of dtscharge. b Cround• (1) 41l11 groundva[er be vichdravn, or vtll water be discharged to groundvater' Cive gencral descripcion, purpose, and npproxima[e quantltlea, if knovn Deecribe vasce material that vill be diecharged into the grounA from aeptic tanke or other eaa![ary vaste Creatnenc facillcy Describe che general eize of che eystem, the number oE houses to be served (lf appllcaDle) or the numbec of pereons the ayetem(s) are expected co serve. P I`" ~ .,4 c U✓ . j ~ ~ f? ~C71-ti.. G 1 ~ ~ ~ ~--~.4U~ ~ (1) Deaeribe any systems, other than choee deeigned for the diepoeal of eanicary vaeEc, Snetalled for che purpoee of dlecharging tluide belov the g[ound eurface (lnclude• ayeteme such ao thore for the dlspoeal of etocm water or dralnage fros floor dcaine). Deaeribe che cype of syatem, the auounc of macerial to be dleposed of through the syeteo and the typea of macerials likely to be dlapoeed of (irtcludLng materials vhlch may enter the eyetem inadvectently thraugh spilie or ae a reaulc of firefighting actlvltles) z19iY' 1/ i. C_3 '/V ✓ vi^.. ~ v,~ -G v Z-~*___. '.L d: `1 v~,G=tl- i~ c'~ C~ ~c•' i r.~ a J -t' (4) Vill any chemlcals (eapeclally organic aolvente or pecroleum fueis) be scored in above- ground or underground etoraga taafce? If so, vhac typee and Que►ntitles of macerlals vlll be etored' 4 9POlUNE EtNTRONKLNTAL ORDI2IA?tCE (WAC 191-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1, . • • . B. CNVIRO:i}MiLAL ELE!{E'N':S (conclnued) rvaluatlon For Agencq Uae Only (5) uhat proteecive cu asurea will be taken to inaure thwt leake or epills of any chemicala etored or uaed on site will not be alloved [o percolate to groundvater (this includes oesauTee to keep chemicale wt of dispoeal syateme deacribed in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? ,0,0 A/0 7L ~/t- ~C.~•~. v-"- / L! L '!54 ~r Y ~ ✓ i vJ ~ ~%i Yrl ~c7 ~ 9 ~-a 1~..5' r.~ ',3- /`"-c-4 ~i" % ~ L t'-t~°' ~c~ ✓ ~4 .-ti1 S ~-cp~~ c 'aater Runoff (ineluding sto m vater) (1) Deacribe the eouzce of runoff (including etorm vater) and mec'iod of colleccion and diaposal if any (include quantities, if knovn) Where will thie water flov7 uill chie water flov lnto ocher vatera' If so, deacrlbe. iC', i c-< L>~-'~!"`',~J- ~.-~..~t-- ~°[.c, Gc= 1~ ~~~.%l C~ li c-.-.~~t3~6. `f'" ti'y...._~ " -G✓Ll.~-~ ~ ~7_~T~-t~.sr.~~c..~ ~.Cf t_"`~C•''--'-~~ a--4~ - - ~ (2) :7111 any chemicale be scored, handled or used on tRe alte !n a location vhere a spill or leak will dcatn to aurface or groundvater or to a ecoro vacer dlaposal syetem diecharging co eurface or groundvater~ ,Oul7 , Could vaete maceriais enter ground or eurface .nters7 II no, genetally deecribe. dO Av e, 7'-' e;' k Pc= c_~-- "7'/t Z1..t"- L1:iGl~cY' • ~ G d Propoeed meaeures to reduce or concrol aurface, ground, and runoff vater tmpacta, tf any (if [ che proposed actlon 11es vithin the AQulfer Sensitive Aree be especially cleac on exylenetiona r relatlng to facllltlee concerning Sectlon• 3b(4), 7D(5), end 3c(2) of thla checkllat). IS' f ti ^'L:-jLe--'L s vi.,trrs a ':heck or circle cype of vegecacion found on the eice deciduous cree. alder, oaple, aspen, ocher. evetgzeen tree• tir, cedar, pine, othec shrub• L/ graes. paeture crop or graln vet aoil plante, cattall. buc[ercup, bullrueh, ekunk cabbege, other water plance uatec Illly, eelgraeo, milfoll, other L/ other typea of veqetatlon. i,(l iI G/ C.V YC&ZCI b Whac kind and amount of vegetation will be reaoved or altered? G(/i ~Gr Lf <I-G' c liec threatened or endangered apecies knovn co be on or neer the site. <LCi d Propoeed landacaping, use oE ontive plante. or other aeeauree to preaetve or enhance vegetation on the s it e, i f nny • t- ge ->V . ~u;_f..~.l.~ ~`t.~:~.ti- U~-c~-ct~.~_.~._~ / 5 SPOKANE ENYtRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (uAC 197-11-460) Section 11.10.230(1 B. ENYIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) ~ Evaluation for 5. ANIMALS Agency Use Only a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or nenr the site or are known to be on or near the stte: birds- awk heron, eagie, songbirds, other Ro »s, i mamnals: deer, bear, elk. beaver, other fish bass, salmon, trout. herrinq, shellfSsh, other• other b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. c. ts the site part of a migration route7 (f so, explain. /{/e; d Proposed neasures to preserve or enhante wilGlife, tf any. /t/c I /LLti' 7h ll.- cZ.-~. C= s7 t) it c: _la )67.! Vl- / d A 5 ENERGY ANO VATURAL RESOURCES a. uhat kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove. solar) will be used to meet the the completed project's energy needs' Describe whether it wSll be useE for heating, manufac- turing, etc. ~~~~~~:..~~c..--~ . ~.C:~r~..-+1.~~~^,'~'~ T `~1~`~~~'a`•~ ~ ~ /r b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties' If so, generally describe. c. tlhat kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposa17 list oiher proposed measures to reCuce or control energy tmpacts, if any ~ 1 ENYIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spiil, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal7 if so, describe. /V0 ~ -F' /t h .r~ ~ !rt (1) DescriDe special emergency services that might be required. cr ~16j 71- 6 - c SPORANE ENVIRONriENfAL ORDINAttCE (uAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1) B. E`tVIRONKEtTfAL EI.Y?ffiJTS (continued) EvaluaClon For Agency Uae Only EI7VIRONiEtT:AL HEAL:'H (contlnued) (2) Propoeed oeaeuree to reduce or control :.tronmental health hesarde, lf any. . ~ r ~ C.v,~.~ D Noiee (1) NAac types of no18e exist in che erea vhich mey nffecc your pro,Jec[ (foT example: traffic, equipment, operation, ocher7 7 What types and levels of no18e vauld De creaced by or aeoociated vich the projecc on a ehorc-cerm or a long-eerei baale (for exsople craffic, conatruction, operacion, other)' Indicate vhat houts noise vould cooe from the site v ~ , ✓'L.~irs~~-sC. :.~y~: / y ~~Y.<<yy~ ~O ~Z~.~~--~c' •-.r ~ • ~ CJ'.~..r,,..! f ~~a.~ ~.s...~-~_ ~ ~'Ys,~,[► •.F , c LL~Lj~L.~l=- / ✓j/r7'l~v l~?~mG~C~~Et a.~..~ . ~ (1) Propoeed oessure to reduce or eoncrol nolae tapacce, if any. a ~"'Y.~'~'~~i`~iG/1.~C'"L~~ ~ {r• L1~7 ~`~r~. L ~ L.e~ I4.- £ ~l-~~7" ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ .sY'_ G"`".-I ~'`~✓t s~..r Ci.~z+E_• :C~ ~ S~/'t~ ~'L..~~ ~ ~ 8. LA'ro AATD SHORELINE USE a. What is che current uae of the eite and ndjacent propertiee' J1 `t' /1. ~7 ~'LP,e~~ l --...s:.F'.>l r i b. llae che site been ueed for agricultuTe' It eo, deecrlbe / V /-v,/ / / -i ~ r c Deautbe any ecruccure• on che aice d. uill any ecructures be demoliahed' If eo, vhich" ~ e u+iat !e the current zoning cleaelficacion of the site? ,I~ ~YI L~, f Le YQ~ f t7hac Sa the current caopTeheneive plan deelgnation of the alce' g if applicable, vhac 1e the current ehoreline master prograa designa[lon of the e1te* IL 97 lb l'..-e- h Haa any part of the site Deen clasoified ee an 'eoviroamentnlly eensitive' area' If so, epeclfy 1. Approximacely how naoy people vould reside or vork in Che completed project? . 7 ~ , . SPOICADTE ENVIAONNENLAL ORAINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.2300, . , y B. ENVIRONKENf1►L %LE`tEtTfS (contiaued) °valuation For Agency Uae Only j Approximacely hov many people would the completed projecc displace? -e k Propoaed meaaurea to avoid or reduce dieplacement impec[s, if any: 1. Propoeed meaeures to eneure the pcopoeal is competible vi[h exietiag and projected land ueee and plans, if any: . . ~i~►s /~~G-y.-+-aK .G-G•: C~' % ~ i ',Y~`P ~,,s ~ ~~,,~1, ✓l.~.,.~ ~cic.~ ~~-~~t=.-, ~-~--~.s o ~-L k--ztz, ~"~.,c. , f ~ 9 IIOUSINC a Approximately hov meny unite would be provided !f any' Indlcate vheChet hlgh-, `ol dle-, or lowtcycome housing. - Alt' b Approalmately hov many unite, if any, would be eliminaced2 indicate vhecher high-, middle-, or lov-Lncome houaing• -s --a'- c. PTOposed measures [o reduce or control housing impacts, 1t any: 10. AESTIIETTCS a trhst la the talleat helght of any proposed sCructure(a), not irtcluding antennae? uhat te the prlocipal exterior building aaterial(e) proposed" ..5 f v t" f c. ~~i U~~✓ 1! ~~v~ ~7 .,~v b IJhat vieve in the inmediate vicinicy would be alcered or obatrvcted7 / ~.t~ - - ~L~ ~s-~'' ~ u..~~ ~.-c ~~1ti.C~ .I~~„~.-~..~~c:--+~..3~ ~ • c Propoaed meaeures co rcduce or control aeathetic impaccs, if any• , ~ f'~,.a ~i[.i''~,~-~~I..e6•~'L~~~ _ ~~j ~ a~t..~Y ~ ~~'K~iCs.' tK.L.C.~•GVC..-ad~ f ~~~'1• ~ / 11 LIGH" MD G1.dfiE a '7hat cype of light or glace vill che proposal producet '7lut tioe of day would it meinly occur' ~ 2,~ ~~c.~.-r---~ G^~~.- c~..~G-~..['--t. rr'l ~-'`•a....r~ t= ~ b Could lighc or glare fron thn finiahed project be a safecy hazard or interfere vi h vieve? ' 490 110 k' _~..40; c tfhat exieting off-eite sources of light or glare may affect your propoeal7 ~ .`iV~~ /~'r i~L~s%✓ <~J ~T %~i.c.s, v p` d. Propoaed meaeures co reduce or control light and glare impacce, if any• ~ j,4e 8 . ..ibr- , . SPOIUNE EIiVIROMMEMAL ORDINANCE (uAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1 B. ENVIRONKENTAL ELEMENf5 (contlnued) Evaluacion For 12. RECREATIOp Agency Uee Only a. Whac deelgna[ed and infocmal recreational opportunitiea are in the immediate vicinity' b uould the propoaed ptojec[ dlaplace any ezieting recrea[lo m 1 usea7 IE so, deeerlbe. c Proposed meaaures to reduce or control impacce on recreation, tncluding recrentionel opportuni- tiee to be provlded by the projec[ or applicanc, if any `Z:?1 '-~..~.cr,%r e, ,...-4 r~-LlZl r '1 / 13 F1I570PIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVA:IOti a. Are chere any places or ob]ecte 1leted on or propoeed for national, scete or local preaerva- clon reglster• Icaovn co be on oc next to the slte? If ao, generally descrlbe 71-- b Generally descrlbe any landoarko or evidence of hlstorlc archaeologlcai, scien[Sflc or cultural importance Sanovn co be on or next co the sice '.✓r' / f f j ~~'~~t~7i,.~ c Proposed oeaeuree =o reduce or control iepaccs, lf any A C7 u f 14 : I',At15 POA'ATI01i a, Idencify public etreeta and hlghvaye eerving the eite and de9eribe propooed accese to the exiscinE ncreet ayscem Shov-on elte plans, if any F ZL~7f'~C1P.~ , o~ /~1_l'__-f'_.rE.~,~.~-12.L~J r'" li t,B'►'+ ~L~-~...irv....( ~ ~7"l~G.~-/"~.~' [~,•,a L4 L-c :'~~'1t,..1..~ 4/Q~'i b le elte currencly eetved by publlc translc' Lf not, vhat is the approxiaate dl9cance to the neareac [racu![ etop' c Ilov many parking epacee vould the coapleced pro)ect have' tlev many vould the projecc eliminate' d ulll the propoeal requice any nev roade or atreeca, or lmprovements co existing roada or screete noc lrtcluding dclveveye) c eo, generally describe (lndlcute vhethe[ public or prlvate) . 11-0 e. utll the project uee (or occur Ln the immediace vicloicy of) water, rail, or air traneportutlon? If eo, generally deacribe. 9 ~ r SPORANE CNVIRONMENTAL ORDIiIANCE (WAC 197-11-964) Sec[lon 11 10.230(1) B. E2JVIP.ON?i2H"AL ELETiENTS (continued) Eveluatlon For Agencq Use Only f Nov many vehicular trips per day vould be generated by the coepleced project7 If Vcaovn, indicote vhen peak vould occur UOri /t 1/cj i- A..,~ Lc. ~ /~Lsr'•t~Zct ~,~il ~_~,~,.~-9 Gi'i'-.~rLC--~1L ~Lu-►.~ z`~-~. - (-~[~i- Cd~K.•C~. C-"t~'~~/L!G/C-c-L~-Q G7/~.i.. L.L/'~~~..l. L GJ~►'~~..Ic-~f v~"~ ~ lf~ i ~ g Proposed measures to reduce or control transpor[ation iopacte, if any. ~~~J In ..v 15 PUBLIC SERVICES a 147ou1C the project result in an increased need tor public servtcee (for e:emple, fire procection, police proceccion, healch care, schoole, other)' If so, generally describe b. Proposed measures co reduce or control ditect iwpacte on public servicee, i` any• XGe~ 1¢~Pe G ti-~e1~ ~..I~t~?_ %?Z .rCt --•-~'ea~~ ' .GY✓~ L~/~ /C,'v~.~' Y Cf/~:dti t-~ 41 v K f ,~~~E'~•, l!fL, / 16 U'ILI71£5 y a Clrcle ucilit currencl avalleble at the site 1•c[rlcic ~acural d ~ate refua ' aervice, elephone, eanicary sever, eepLic syBCem, oE e ` , n , Tv< <c i~ s . b Describe the utilltlee tha[ are propoeed for the projecc, the ucility provSding the eervlce and the oeneral construction activltiee on the eite or 1n the imoedlete vlcinlty vhich migh[ be needed. / Y'G~ i7~ / ✓ ~ / ~L / V / 4 0 -WC-V ~ c. ..r .~.~r., (5 ,s~ c-~~~-cv ; s 3'} . ..ya S ~°'c.~. c.~ 1~ ~ . r~ ,~.~.•K (fi~~Z~,,, ~ c.,.,G n ~ /I/ / / al / S:L I.- t".S~~n j -i v _ C. SICNATURP I, the undersigned, evea r under the penalcy of perjury tReC the above reeponsee are made trvthfully and to the beec of my kn w.+ledge I also underscand thnt, otiould there be eny villful mlssepresentetion or vlllful laek of [ull diecloeurc on my parc, the aReney may vlthdrav any determinstlon of nonsignificnnce that it might leaue in reliance upon thia cheekllet. Date ~6 Proponent ii-C~' ~G`l~//'~~v'G~'~-.~ r1~s%~~ (Please Prln[ or Type) Proponent Addreee !~G-<_1-1 ~ (Sil!(nacurc) Phone : /6 Z j Person completinE form ~ C'' Y L7 Da[e /~/i .71 • Phone. POR STAPP USE ONLY Staft member(e) revieving checkliec Based on this ataff revlev of the environmental checkliet and other pertlnent informatlnn, the etuff A. Concludee that chere are no probable eignificant adveroe impacte and recoamends a determinacton of nonsigniflcance 8. Concludes [ha[ probable eignificant adveree environmental impacte do exist for the cu nen► propoeal nnd recommertde a mitlgated deter- minatlon of noneigniflcaace vich tondiCiorte. C. Concludes that there are probable eignlficap[ edverie environmeatal lmpac[s and recommenda a determimtion of eignifieance. PILINC PY3 - $75 00 10 ~ Swi. 'T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~oa D1C.J) , ~ . ~ y t ~ • ~ .v ' • e =46m9O V =89m9O E ~ - ~ , - - ' . _ J:~...-- J::! L~ , y ~ , - . . . . . • . . . . . - . . 4 ~ N : , . • : _ • C L4 26+n ~ ' ' ~ • ~ ly : ' ~ ~ ~ c~~. ~ _ F tA _A_ V~-----~ - r, . • ` i C ' ~ ' ' ' • , ~ ~ (,f, ~ \~G_C~ _ ZBTN • ~2~1I1 ~ • - ~ • • . . . _ - - . Y S - - • ~~e ~ - \ . . : . . . . . • • . Cw~ 29th ~ Ave ~ .i- ~1 C . . _ ~ . - . . . . . , I . . . ~ . ~ : ~ •1 - 301 h ' Av e ~ . ~ " . \ . ' • . • . . . . . . . • • . . . , ' • i. d , , ~ ' ~'1 C) • ~ . Q o ' . ujU 31 s t • ~ ~ ; q v e . ~ 13T . a . . . . , . . . . . , . . . ~ _ -fz 32nd Ave u) _ ~ l ~ ~ ' ; : • . . . . . . . . . . . . • ~`I-'~3 2►~ ~vE ~ : . . • ' I'3~~~rLr>• . Yc : f~~.••' ~ . . 3 . ~ 't ~ '5 4 TN ~ ~ ~ , , • ~ ~ C ~ . . . . . . , . r . , • F j47N U : _ ~ \ ~ • S Z f. 'SSTH /~VC • • L~ . ~ : . : 2 W ~ ; I:, • 3 • • \ . ~ - ~ . fl . s~ t cz 'o 3STU ~ c. ~ Q ~O 3ca T N /lv E r ~ ~ ~ `Z- ~ ~ . . . . . ..t; • • • ~ L 53 ~ • ~ ~ 3 7 T t-t p AVE . • . . . . ~ ~ Q C-2 : ~l 3 •Y o ~ ! LL 4 ` , ~ pT~t, ~ w - - ~ . . 3 3 - - - N 3~GIMM~.I'L.C)N Q•(/ " , O V!'~ OC 4 2- co w ~ o ~ ^ ~ ~ , t • / C ~ D ^ ; ON~ ~ ' t r 44 YH ~ Cl) , ♦ s ~ • ( ~ ~ • ~ . r 0 ~ . ` u~ + ~ ~ • t ~ r . C' \ . ~~.~,~i~~~ ~ ~ J. ) ♦ \ 1 1 . • . V ~y ( ~?.c 4 ~ ~ ~ll~ r - - _ _ - - ~ . CNESTrz2 r ~ ~ ^ r-~ . V E N . . . , . ~.-rEM ~ . e~--r:-~ . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , , •s t..: ar ~ ~ , s , • c • . . . • • u.•_ • t • : e'a. • . . . : _ . ~ - . i • r ~ v • - ~ - j ' • - - _ LAJ u 3 a(oT u A%4 E (D c~ ' ^ (~~•~1VE ~ 1 . u.~ 0 . UE ~ ~ ~ ~ • 3 a ~ ; ol. U. a 4 n 47T11 ~~'1~ ~ QV F. . F3_T.H__ - • ~ f J J 1 - . . , S 4~ 2, , , z.. ~ f i s c. : 32 25 44- ` or 4 ~ • O 7 Q _ S6f'2/ E ~ ~ J1i,l:` - - ~ - - - l ~ ~ ~ ~+r•s \ ~ - - - ' . \ C- O 1 ~ ~ r f1 :z ~ N • r. ~ . ~ . \ j"" • • ~ ~ et~ , o ~ . ~ ~ • ,v y ~ Ti.M►oaARV \ z a 11 R~ ~ - t • ~C~.o~Url■ ~y ~ ' ~ l2-S o \ ~ dl • ~ ~ t + • ~ r J~f, ° 4 f~ + ~ s 4 s° . • 1 / \ ~ ;6 s ~ s f s t e • o • ~ z rO • i•~ 1 . f Q ~ . ~ ~ . f . z M \ ► ~s . ~ Ii s ' .,rA ' ct , \ ~ ` L N~ ~ : ~ ~ I t 3,^. ,t." N ~ ,s . - i o,~ ~ ~ ~ " • a , i. e ' p ~ W. 4r. ~ ~ ( ~ I ` 4 to s " ~ S = . ' L • e~' + ` S ~ %f . --t. • ~ ` • f\\ J , hu ` .r~ 'Y_// ~ ~ ' , .s . ~ ~ s ~ • _ 9 • ~ ~ ~ ~/O r.4 tj ' ~ •ti1 S• p ~ Tl " • ' ~ , - - •1 ~ = • ~l Y~ _)r, CiMtit~~iN Air.Jl-O.ap~ ,r-~ ~ 0 II L? I S • ~f ~ ' ~i ' 2 ♦ ~ - ` ~ ~ y Cl ~t ~ { ~ c~ ~ . O ap , t r• ~ j ~ 1r • e F _'fu . ~.~^~A L » • ri N ~ " ► -71 a p } : st.~r 0 ~ Y 3 4 Q 'i~Q : ~ 1 F.',nni. ~ ~ • P l ~ ~ve z' ~ ~"C a ~ ' ~ + ~ ` 9r.. ~ ~f << • • ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ • ~ . 0 ~ a r ~ • ~ . 4"NO cr. s t t, ~ ~(f 1 ~ - ~ nr 2 1 4 4L As~_ « o " ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ i ~t ~ 4 ♦ ~ ~ L 4t V Z, 4!or. CT y'~ . ~ ~ 1 • ~y ~ It - $ ' r n 7 4 ~ ~ ~ ^t .4 : 7 6 5 5 44 ♦h cor. + E 32 or ' .-y. , . No - 3 Z - ~ - ri o ' 0 •333 4~ _ -~yJPs•.e•w q ~JL y r L ~ ~ d. . k _ , . ` ~ ' ~ ' • t ~ • a4 ~ ~ f' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ y ~ • T ~ ir ~ ~ 8AY e. ~ ~ . * ~!*4 i • ~ ~ •..J fo IR 'riLh'1P04L&c.y ~~I► * 06 ~ ~ . pp 116 r+l~ to ~ #7 # : r r. _ \ * 1461 + ~ . • s ~i~ ~i s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ • 10 `o e ~ ~ t : ~ _ • ~ ~ ~ Fe r~• ~i 8 ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~s . . ~ • . 1 d.~ ~ ` t~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ' ~ #iv~• AJoc~f C"k ~ ~ . . ~ ~ • ~J. t air #4 PJI i" dt . ~ r ~+~.r.~► ~ ~r ~r!'~:~~^- ~ : ' ~ ' . ~ ~ . a ~ /+n ~ 'fi/•• ~ ! f ~ * ~ it !ir PL ' ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ . ~ - 0 ~ 0 F.K . ~ ~rI '8 aal +s A4W%! 4. K M` ~ ~ ~ • p' +G~ r~ ►01 IY -+N ~ + of' i RAllROAD ZONING FILE NUMBEA YARIANCE FILE NUMBER ~ ~+4 ~r4 i~ Ni► I ~ , I • , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t , i • / , j ; 1• `AN• L~1~ VY~M ~ (10) UNIT WIMO I»I uNiT wiMO • ~ ' ~ ~ / YF R 0 . 1 11:) uNir wiMa ~p ~ I ~ I L i l 9Q ' COYYONS Al1EA ~ ✓ - ~ ' ~'1 °o~,+,. ~.r, ~ • ~ ~ J* ~ , " ' - i ~ , ~ ~I . ~ ~ ~ ~ C y , . , ` . ,q ~ , , PROJECT INFORMATION 0'O LXIITINO =OM[ t6T, 1169 -A0. PIIOPOiED i0N[ U.R. 13 ~ y,,,~►r IITL All[A 120,190 t.F. 2.905 AC. SUIlDIMO COYlIIAOE (YAX.OOf) 40% X 0/[M II►ACt r&rueu*u401 PEOUI11E0 PAIIKINO ~ ( 1.6 x 74 UNITi 1 '41 i1T! ►LAN ►IIOYIO[D Bcw ~ ruv NT. 0/ S1D0l. 21' : Nll ~ • • ~ \ ~ YICINI~T YA/ S /IIO►0{t0 : 11 WIIT ELDERLY HOUSING frrr~G~ r4 ~ i • . - ' - . . . . . . . « 'I J . i rn ~ fI / ~ ~ I - - - - Iz ~ 1 ~ 4P l ~ 16 ~ ~ • ~ ~ \ • v ~ ~ . ~ ` . L• ~ y• ` ~ ~ . \ . • ~ / J~ J f J / 1 ~ • / \ t &406 ~ . ~ ~ ~ / ~ \ , ~ . ~ , , , . ~ REDEEMER VILLAGE ~ RETIREMENY CENTER - J sPOKANE, wA. . ~ e ~k ► • 7; . ~ , ` w.i . , N•C t~,~, lf ► • t' : ~ '~':5;..;-yi~~~ { } „i~ el ~ • 7. ~f ~ , . ~ t ~ . . f ♦ (i. ..F , ~ . . •t'- A,.ta, ~ "y~ . • . . N ;F w, ~ ~J' ~ ~ r `f~~:a s ~*"'r" f _Z "z' t~:~: ~l~ 1 ~ ' ~ ' ' ~d ~ L YI. ~t.~.~ ~ 'K:f,.~~ ~ - ~ ~ ` t ~ ~ s Y t~~ ~ ""-1 •i - . . I~, ~j!~r. ~"~~~~~~i1"i . ; ' c~y~ "•~-f•'` ~ +,~i~s' : . ' , ' ~r~ .r c D S, ,r. i V v ~:%''''rr ~ ~~~yl~Ky~:'~ ~ ~i 7~~.,~ - ~e'.'"~- ~ ~i °'1 ~ , , t 11s ~ -.~..~c"- ~ " +t~10~f~~~ 4 ^ 1 , • „w,,.~~ ~f~ ~ ~ "~~+4~. ~~'•~x- + , ~ M~~;~ t. ~nr'r 1.~~-! "P~~r~~~ - ' . ~ ~d, ~ • ~i11 _ 4 ~ . ~jt~ ~i~~ • , ~r ~iF~'~',' . , ~J ♦ 1 ~ - i •5~,~ ` . , ~ ~~~L ~ ~ ~y-•• 1. w'~r~ 1. '.i ~ - r ~ ~ - ~ ~ r'r• 'f . ~ ~,~y _ ~ , . . ,,y.±±IT. ♦tr ~,7 t i i~ ' ~ , . -7r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ • 1 , . . 1. j= ~~~~f~t'-~ I• 1.~ t w:t.' ; ' .'yt • . yr T ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ' . ~I"~ ~L. ~T"~ ~ ` - ~.•~~i1~~~ ~ . ~y~:~~~ ~ ~.~..l~`~ • r • ~ ~ ti ` ~'r y = ~ ~ f i-r-'~' ~ r, ~ . . ~ I _ . - ~ L • ~ • - - „ ~ ~~.•s~.r~.- " . ~ ~ ~ , . 4ft . .i ♦ Y . : ~ y ~ wt. ~ N • . . . ~!1°} ~ f . ~ • ~ ' ~w-- ~ • - • 4}rQ'1~ ,~w ~ ' . . • . t. . - . w. r ! t,,... , . . • ' Nt ~~N1ER ~Q~ AE?~aE1AE . EDEE~Ea Y~`~ R AVi 3STN ~ ~ + RM'ti , ~ , . . 30I4S pANE0 9+ . sL ~G ~ ~ a~ 0 • zONF- C , / c • v ~ i~ . ` ~ ' . , _ 32 . ~ V ~ • ~ ' ■ • • • ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ~ ~ ~