The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-52-85 , . . . . EA-5 ~ • 'r :,T/" . 4-r'`- 'c1 ~ ~ -j"' r ~ _ ~ ~E~ Pi _ - ~ • z~ i ' QI'!'I(sL UF COU NTY EN G I N EER y~ r j ~j • ~.~'Z ' `f".°nr, T^~ ~ q~ , p ~f• Fjr, t ,•.Uw•~--~7'+i ~~"~7~s~ia ~ ~ Ronald C. Hormann, P.E. ' 'A:tii r ~~~L~`,~`~~~~3'-~-"*~'j• COUNTY ElVG1NEER '~:~1~~..~:...~~r ~1~~ •s. ~L'a,:~.'w:~'l;leD :ri-,... ~1 ..la . -c~ 9 9 2 6 0 ~e'OhANE CvUNiY COl'RT 14CU5t Date: 7- 6 - 09 R~: Vj )3 R 4Q ~ Vi L A Gv E ~a Genr 1 emen : A rpview af the road, drainag2, and parKing pians for the abcv2-; PfEr- enced plai, shor± plat, bindirig si te pian, and/or bui lding permit has beef accornp 1 i sh ed . Areas o f coricerii to us are i na i c.ated i n red cn th le att acheci pri nt s. P1 ease make the correctiuns and resubmi t them t7 th i s offi ce -in order that the review process may rroceed. Whzn the plans are resubniitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any guestions about this revizw, please contart us at 455-360U. Thank, you. . Very truly yours, Ronald C. Hormann, P. E. SpoKane County Engineer a • ~S . ~ PJeison, P.E. Plann?ng Engineer GSN287:s1a Attachment Public Works Buildinq North 811 Jefferson StreEt Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456-3600 , - - - - • - - - - - ~ - . - - - /h°~/~ ~ ~~C _ - - - WEJVED - ~ - SjDI~~ ~Q/~~`:'11 . _f C.._. ~~~5 - - - • - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - _ ~ - - - - . J UN 16 l Ca~^n~;~i.~ rom posi~ ~~tiv~ Go~,~~G~~~✓r s _ _ _ . Cw* Engineering - - - - ~ --T'04zj Av.,e,_ . ,/Cc►-~ Avm s►'~12w~ ~ ~vi~-wu-~'1~ ~ ~ t - - - - - ✓~21 ~~c~ -~'~'-z . ~~(~~5~' _ z/ Z75' ~ Z . - - - ~ gj Cv~~ 41-Z 7,1 ~1?2 ° - - . - - ; ~ - 3_ . . _ - . - - S_37U lo~073 4Z Z/ W.0 ~L-- ~ . 6 ~-7 4~' 6loLt i? - ~ ~~-~~~~s~ 1 - - - . - - . . - ~ . . - . - - ~ (q, &'?5-4 Z,q°z)(0.1) 4-CZ, 2-75-tJpoof ~et5Y6.9p) _ . i Zl9 f V,07-7 ~ . 17,SS~ - - - - - - = - 3~5~ - - - . . - - - - ~ - - - - - - ' tfJ Tr G.! ~ 4-~~<o~~ + /o, (o~n ~ - c3 - - 2-3, 4~~0 _ - - ~ Z~, ~d - - . 4~.SLl _ . - - - - - - - ~ - . ~ ~ . ~ . _ - - ~ - - ~ - c~ ' ~Z6, ?-1eao)(a,9', ~ . - - - ~ - - - - ~ 70 . _ . . ~S - 70 , ~C-) - -~.,r..-~ - - - - - - ~ . - - . S ~3~- i,oe:;,~~~r,~~ 8~~s►~ ~ c ~-7 YU-1~ 5-, ` . - . - . . _ --R,~~v. . ~ o- s~~ , - _ - - - - . _ - - - - , - . . - s-=-- - i- , - - - - - - - - - - ,S • • - - _.~.r~ _ - - - r.__ - - : ~ - / ~ - - - - - - - _ - ~ - - - - - w - - - - - . . _ . _ - - - al , . , z . - - - J--- - _ - . ~ 3,_57S_ - - - - - - - _ . . _ /G3, ,57~ . - - . - - - z~~~. . _ . . . - - . . - . _ -Fp .P'"--e~ . a~ _ ~ . . . _ . . . _ - - - - - Q._--_ ~ - - - - 4----~ - - ~ - . . . _ _ . - - - - - QL 57 - - - - - - - - _ .d ~~Z~D~~~ = - _ ~ _ - Z ~ C4CSp ~ . C3-j~__ ~ - . q~ ' ~~}3✓~tl # #Z _ ~.-Q- _ Gi~!'z~Gd? JD. rJ ~ S~~ fiU Y _ . - - - - ~ ~J" ~ ~ i_`.. 4z:r4:-.Zc - . _ - - - - - - ~ . ~ - - . - - - - _ _ - - - ~ - . _ . . _ - ✓ Ja. o~ z _ - - - - ~ c07 ?t$ CD.~'~ ~~--~!~,9✓-~- - - - ~ - --~oy- 41~ _ - - - i=%~- - QsS~~-~, ~~s . - - _ - . - - - - - - ~ - .3i 5li 51 .100leA ~ . , , ~ ~ ~ . - ~-e.- - C►~~~ -~Gc-~ ~ ~ - 96v_. - ~ _ _ - ~ 1!`_ ~i1Y~I 30~5-- - - ~ - ► ` . f`~5 Il(.) _ , Q _ G;~B - - , /f~ a• ~/Z - s ~ • - . . . . - - ~ ~ - - . . _ - ~~-o!- - ~ ./c... . _ . - - . ✓ - _ . . - _ - _ - . , - - - - ~ - - - ~t - - ' _ ff 4_4 . . , . , - - - - 3 - - - - _ _ . ~ . _ . _ . - - - ~ - - _ - Q Cc1~►1~0~~~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ 3~1v~/~4~ C ~C ~ ~ Izz2 ~ z5ty,,Vl ~v~.~ _ - I . . • ~ ~ . - - . - - - . . _ - - - - . . - . . .._~/f~0_.~..~U~_ _ S. . .-.24 _~DS.!~i #S ~246- . , r~.~._.. - 474- i'_e, A_rlil_ a_.I_t.4zq - Q~~ __O,~ D~ ~Ud S ~4,ssl~'~✓yr- G!~-~+r j1,v-. _ I ' T o..Q 7~4-~2_ 7~ . ~ / ` Q51A. S -41la/~,~~ _Gt_C~ . 18ocn7pt- c.?..`~ . , - - - ~ • - - - _ - - - - . • ' - _ . _ _ _ - - - 1-__ - - - - _ _ . y , - - - - - - - - - - - . . - - . . - --S~~Y~- - -~i~C~/~~i~' .7~ . 5~v~--. l/~~O~.t1-. , /S. i~- - - ~ I , - -AVALL6461.r,- S_?_DIZW6'ff_--___ - ~ - - - ~ - - / - - - . . - - - - - - • • ~ - .oe . ~ . - . ~ _ - - - • - - - - - - - . . _ - - - ~ - s~~ . -5 _ ..~cA /c)v e ~ . ~ - - - - - - - - . ~ - - Aa. 5'~ ~ ~ L ^ - - . _ - - - - - - - ~ - _ _ , . . - - - - - - - - . _ ~ _ . . _ - ~ - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - ~lYi~~ _ 4!e O. 4 - - - ~ - - - ~ _ . - - ~ - _ - - _ , . - - - _ _ Z ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - - _ _ . _ - - - . -3 _ . _ - . ~ ~ - _ . . - - ~ . . - - - . - - - - . - - . - - - ~ - - - - t - ' u s/ _ . CtitJ .~i f~~~.LL~G . c~ ~ 1T/ _ GC, ~j%/'I ~'/'~%~-S~ C - - - - ~ vC,~`Q~ 7b - ~i r - Q~ ..~o_ . - - - - - ~ ~ . . c~~~i`~t ~ • - - _ . . . - - - - - - . _ . . ~ - - - - - . . . _ . ~h.5rrvy~ 3D.., vo9 --=---0,~.9/.__c~'s_---- . ~ ~ ~~Jurno 8•'~:~-~-- ~ , . - ~ c z~'s s_ _ _ ~ ~.I - m----- - ca~~/ ~ Liv`~ ,L~/ ~ ~YL _ ._~/L~j ~!~c l p /r"~ " • ~ _ - ' ~IJd_1.~.,.5-Iro ~ • , , , . ~ . _ _ . . . _ _ ~ ~.i~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ .J_ .~.C . c~_ ~ _ " . ♦ !t ~.~~.s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r_. ~ _ ~r ~~m..r__ • i ~ ~ .~r _ a- ~e ~ ~ . . ~ ' • • ` ' - - - c zw~r~t v,> _l _ = _ 2 o x ?~o 5 J _ = _ _/~o . ~ 3 - . . - - - - ~ - - - Z (Zo +7.o~ Zg )(.37S 41'L 3------ ; ~ : vo 2U jjaU -E-. jU aD't-. Z~~t 37 4-2 ~ -_Y 1) Sr? 7" ~ . ~ - r J, z~o ^ = - . . ~~v~ tft~~.__~k~tli~2 _~_:o/~ l~l =F3Z , - .~.~r---- ~ • ' _ `7 1Z z - - - 3 - - - - - . 4~{1OY) - _.._L'~ ~j - - • - - ~ - • Z - ; ~ - - - _ . . - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ - . . . - - - - 50 4:1~7 ~"__(--7<3 -tlZf/Z.;--7f337~-= ~7•~- -~3- - ~ , . , . j . s _4 53 7-/ Sf 7_6 - ~ t7s) I v -~t. . - - - - - ~ . - - - - -3 - - . - . _ - - U~~- ~ ~~~I'~y! :f ~ f 6 7.~~-~?• s ~/_~b f 3~~~ 7~I ~ . - - - - , ~ - - - _ ~ ~ ~'s ~51~~►~: - _ P _ _ ~ . ~ ; • ' • A1F,4D0w,6A1Y-)r, VILLI9&` . . bAsINs ~ /it 9V2- . . ~ - BOWSTRING METHOD . . DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (min) 5 Time of Concentration (min) .e •S' - oucflow (c.f.s.) o. P,w) . Design year flow (yr. ) /n Area (acres) D. lelOZ Developed "C" factor Area x "C" D, 13e> , , . . ~l 1 #2 t #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Time Inc, 'fime Inc. Intensity Q dev. V in V out Stcrage (min.) (sec.) (in./rir.) (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) / Ul * 60) (A*C*#3) (see below) (eu[flot,r*#2) (#5-#6) ~ . , , I j ~ jUU 1 3.18 i D. elel ! i1-7 I 9'Q ~ 10 ~ 600 ~ 2.24 ~ D.309 ~ 217 i /fS0 ( 3-7 I is I 900 I i.» ~ D, 2~~ I z~S I z7 0 j -o . ~ 20 ~ 1200 ~ 1.45 + 25 ( 1500 ~ 1.21 I 30 ! 1800 I 1.04 I I I ~ ~ 35 ~2100 ~ ..91 ( • 40 ~ 2400 , .82 ( 45 + 2700 ~ .74 SO ~ 3000 j. .68 ~ 55 ~ 3300 ~ .64 ' 60 ~ 3600 1 .6I ~ 65 ~ 3900 ~ .60 ~ - - 70 ~ 4200 ~ .58 ~ 75 ~ 4500 ~ .56 + 80 + 4800 ~ .53 ' 85 ~ 5100 ~ a52 ~ 90 ~ 5400 f .50 ~ 95 ~ 5700 ( .49 ~ 100 ~ 6000 ~ .48 Vin = 1.34 * Q dev * t for t< Tc Vin = Q dev * t+.34 *-Q dev * Tc for t> Tc 306/6 ball-e-I ~ ' S . . . . wiv BOWSTRING METHOD vi DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (min) S Time of Concentration (min) G S i ~ ~ Outflow (c.f.s.) • / CFS ~ 8 ~ J Design year flow (yr.) /C~ Area (acres) //Z, t Developed "C" factor (,_.30 Area x "C" 111 #2 t. #3 #4 #S #6 ii7 Time Inc. Time Inc. Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage (nin.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) U1 * 60) (A*C*#3) (see below) (outflow*#2) (!f5-ll6) ~ ' I V ~ I Juu i :s . i 8 i ~ 10 ~ 600 ~ 2.24 ~ 0 .~UO ~ (P3Z ` 15 ~ 900 , 1.77 ~ 20 ~ 1200 ~ 1.45 zs ( isoo ~ 1.21 30 ~ isoo ( 1.04 ~ 35 ~ 2100 ~ .91 ~ 40 ~ 2400 ~ .82 ~ 45 ~ 2700 ~ - .74 ~ so ~ 3000 I .68 ~ 55 ~ 3300 ~ .64 i 60 ~ 3600 ~ .61 65 { 3900 ~ .60 ~ 70 4200 ~ .58 ! 75 ~ 4500 ~ .56 ~ 80 ~ 4800 ~ .53 ~ 85 I 5100 I .52 ~ 90 ~ 5400 ~ .SO ~ 95 ~ 5700 ~ .49 ~ 100 ~ 6000 ( .48 Vin = 1.34 * Q dev * t for t< Tc Vin = Q dev * t+.34 * Q dev * Tc for t> Tc' 306/6 SM2ASZr AvA1 L~-,eLE-E /A) -57,eie!97- /s /80 3 . is co~VsAE:je 1VA-?iv€~Y Low FoR ,PME AZD 57a,eXe,,e ~,6,E9 i5 /Av AeT/~~IAV- ---"c) u~ SpoT zOhW-oe2ff /)IVAOA~ , A/40,9,1/72S o)C' (45~T// • 4.~'. . . , MM40cW lBceoo y, , BOk'STRING . METHOD . f " - DETENTION BASIN DESIGN Time Increment (min) 5 " Time of Concentration (min) LS - Outflow (c.f.s.) • ~,(o ~Z 5►~~¢ D•~'~ Design year flow (yr. ) Area (acres) i?,-7 (p Developed "C" ractor o.2q7 ~ Area x , . . #1 #2 t U3 #4 !`S #6 Time Inc. Time Inc. Intensity Q dev. V in V out Storage (nin.) (sec.) (in./hr.) (c.f.s.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (cu. ft.) (U1 * 60) (A*C*#3) (see below) (outflow*'2) (115-116) .s u U ~ :s .1 ~ I 3. ~S I Z1 ZF3 I I ~ I - - ~f A I 10 ~ boo I 2.24 36,Q qo Z I is ( 900 ( 1.77 I/. I/► 9s~ I S~ I i.Uy~ ~ ~ 20 ~ 1200 ~ 1.45 720 . ~ l, ~ 25 ' 1500 ~ 1.21 ~ 3(o 9oo ~ 1,271 . ~ 30 ~ 1800 ~ 1.04 21 'ZD(,o 0 50 ~ 35 ( 2100 ~ .91 ~ 40 2400 ( .82 , . 45 ~ 2700 ! .74 ! 0, f33 ~ 2. ~ZZ lo?.O ~ 7oZ ~ 50 3000 .68 ~ 55 ~ 3300 ~ .64 ( .-7 Z + z, ~ y ~80 ~ 60 + 3600 ~ .61 . , 65 { 3900 ~ .60 ( Q. l07 ( Z, (Pa3 °I ~ 2, 390 ( 9 ~ 70 I 4200 ~ .sa ~ 75 ~ 4500 .56 80 ~ 4800 ~ .53 ~ D,.SI 9 2►~~30 ~ Zc~ I $5 ! Sloo ! .52 1 D•S8 { 3,0~9 I3,~G~ I -o _ ~ 90 ~ 5400 ( .SO ~ 95 ~ 5700 ~ .49 ~'loo I 6000 ~.48 I 1 1 Vin = 1.34 * Q aev * t for t< Tc Vin = Q dev * t+.34 * Q dev * Tc for t> Tc- 306/6 4i1 bAE.D 2 ' « ' t" - ' . . ' . ' ; t1 , . . •j. . _ » ~..'••1•,'' A• . . • • . i ' ' ..'1 ~ ` . ~ ~ .f 2.0 1000 l~Od . ~ 7+Od . 600 .000! 3.0 SOC 100 " .00l ~ J00 1Z0 .0003 y 4.0 roe 0004 - .ooos 94 .oooe ?ao 04 F--.aoca N ,4 5.0 Te ~ .oor o ~ Tt p t4.' K ~ 1a~ 60 to Oat ~ 100 ~ ~ •Qr ~ ~ ~ 0 e tZZa y.4t ~ ~ 0.0 h 70 w 60 Ju •ODa 4 UA 9.0 31 0/0 O h l0:0 V SO ~ J 40 t7 Dt4 24 t,. .030 ~ 30 ,4~'~0 4 Q , Ae p,~o .o V ~ ~.OiO ~ V 20 .080 Ca ~ .100 o 20.0 -1o ro g e e Jo. o ~3 4 0, ~ l . ` G FS 3 S., QtpG0- 6.t~0 40.0 A~~'V rj~~ , ? py FO'R c~? No~QoRAslZE oF , RE~~I REP ~1 l1~ , , ul A R pR C1RC FuI. 1. Fv R . ~ FL DVVING r ~ n _ Q, O/2 . RATr. ~~~~AL rc7RMt.IL..A HYDRCLOGY Df~ 1~I d. 7,r` LJ .I S~ ~ ~ ESIGNEf'. -r• G. NELC ) ON B A ti:° I ti-l 1 PF:O,7EG"f' NAi-•1E I1EADOWBF;C]Okti VT i._L._AC~E DEc:i C f-l: IP'l" T L:l hJ P. T. C: f::: MASON M09:[ 1-L HCl !"1 f_ PRCrt J EC"C t"~ itiI f„' LC} RA SUBriF;E.A J. . 40^ ACr1ES Si iEsAREr-' RUNCiFT- G00"F 1: i..~IEFiT 11-4 TUTAi_. AREA . 4C) f? AC R E:) rM,1POS7f:_ I1II'401=7 C:CJf-7r=A=' :I Et f'i" ,34.1 OYERL.ANT? FLOW VAI_UES `t - .15 N .01. 6 S . (;)2 C:HANNEi._ L.OUi VAl_.UE:S L.. T D t:) R C1aMPLJTEU VALIJES D1..lR 5. 00 110 - 3.13 Q 1 .44 DA , r.;.i BO61t S"FF: INCCf51_.. G ULATT Cl NS :7F3"1"E - 7f6%87 EES:rCONEf; -m B. N"-,:.L_SClh.l B i=~WiI i'd + 2 1='F;UJE'-:C1"' NF'~ME r-lE:ADOWBRO0l-::: 4'IL!_AGE D E Jf" R I F' T aON, MASOhl Mt3B:f: LE HO1''iE F'f: C] JCW CT 0f~ l... C3f :r~ t 1- 1 r r t~.~ 1ss i t v C3 t,-~ c.--! ti• a V J. cI t JOU•; 'CB ) t c1 r,~;ca e f rn i n . ) f sec . j t i r-t . r-• . ) i c: » ~fr a ~ } : c:: U, ft. > t c:. u. -Ftn 3 (cL: . ~W't,. ) 5 i~::s .18 . f~~`~ ~~t:~ F7 ~ ~r i j r.- -;r--v . . i~1 E~ ~~i~ 2.24 .z_ 15w1,) 905..) 1.77 n 24 245 .R.. 7R? 25 .y''„~ H 5-) .6.'~i~00 1.45 rc f;..~ .~'C)C~ a:et 5 15 C) E..' 1.21 q w. 7 .21 0 8 ~_}1 . t.% ~l• . 11 2,~ '.s t.a ' 1~'. Ea ~ w5 5x L..3 .i.. IQ r..r ■ 9.G r 13 y i? •.7 4p +.o "~1 40. C) r Z} t ).82 1.11 2#34 7 :421 Ci ~=l~ i ■ 4.~ J... M l Y f..• 287 i~ W t«f 2'wT t~f ~ t~j a6Gd r Z..' 2 r'!a ^ 900 41 1 GJ 5..~,1 . ~»f ti 3 4.3t..) . ~7'~' . l..)r-j ~:t~t ~ 60 „ i y s:6(_iC) . 61 .03 W :l 1. G fCb : ~ c 65,, z.~ ~C700 . 60 w P,33 2- 7 I 171 t ) .._241 i Ci „ C3 4200 .5 a 3 ~:.i. ; 1 t; l r; 5) . W ) 4:.'s C)t .56 . 08 997 t j 4 -0 z:y0 a ; v~ . E~y'' -7 c- 1440 {a9 1 85.0 5.{. o .32 r C)7 7,70 1. 5 .L 6:..j 1«, ,.s c~~ . t>"* _ ,.3i~ 4C) 95 . C} 5 7?..~ (.e . ti 9 a 17 9 ~ 17.1 :i. c:-1 0 o t_s 600cNf .43 , r.->'7 4~°~ ; a0c) =~9.J i HE I`'1AX.i. MUI"'i S'1" ORACE :l Li 8.~a .,78:t ti34'7ti1 C~ %a (1-.J . i T w ~ T t7 e t i r►i e u f c4 n c_ or t. M- - ,e L. i c) n a. s m 1 r3 l.i -t:. F, a The Und~.~ ve]. opicc: F1. ca vd U t_t t a. s c: r,: 5 u "r C:N `fEAR STORh'1 ~..'AL.C° i~A T I C11\fA 1_ F 0 R!`i'ULA H `,'.~R C]L.0 Ca'r DA"i F: = l i 6!87 DE. 'S S G Pa Ef"i =G. NE!_. c> OIl BAS T N 4 -i- 5 F'RQJF'C"F NAhYIE = ME ADOWBROOK V It_I._nGE . DESGR I F°Tz aN nM-:: M(yS)C3iJ i 1L7ii'i LE flC?ME 1=130,3F C'7' Ol`! F I_.C)RA StJFi~REA 1 = 1.12 AGRES Sl.iBARL;f-', :i RUhJ('-)FF=' CC7EFFI CT ENT TCIT"AL. AR'E:F`► 1. . 1-2 ()r'RE,a C`C1i"tf= L1 s:[ -E'E hUNCll";= ClClEFmF:1' C:t E= t•.1T t!VERLAND FL_ OUJ Vf t L. UEM I.: E.. .15 L. I c_3 iV a 0 16 ~ ~ .0W cHANNEt_ FLc:aw vALt_~~S L _ f:; T D 0 C;ClMF'lJ"1"ED VA!_.I,JES I:)!_1R 5.00 I 1 i:y - 3* . Is 010 1.29 . C?r'1 0. 00 N0 WS T l=t 7: !A G CA L.Cl.1L_P-i "H 0 N S Ur-T'E: 7; Eadci DC:S'IE_,hlE=F: t;. NEf__ St:31'+i BASa:N 4- 4. IOJ f='Rt]Jrc-:c..r NfisMc - I"lEADOWBROOF::: V1: L.L~-SGE DF: ";::)C-'Ft I1='T T C#fi! Dr fi:K MA;aON MOE-i Z LI----: 1-iCli`1F FROJECT CDN FL.ORA t t I rs ter tsi l. y Oci ev tt Vi n Vcaut L_ ~d: ! izd. nN ~ i G c: . } t :i rr . / f , r- ) f c.e q -s•( a -~v 5. l ~e. .I. q'Cy ~ 5 .L r ~ ti ~.a 41218 ~ ~ r, ~.h L~ I E i . i i 2.24 . 9F::b 6 1 -•-29 i 900 1 . :y 7 . 1 ~.1 c: ~ M• 9 . ~..1 ~ .~.'.~_ji_~ 1 2 f':=i 7 - .?t~> _°"~1f•_'•~ 2 5 r .f 1 ...t'..f C«? I n 21. .49 .-7 f ! 1a:a 50 o 1 etDO ~ 04 .42 7 17 19 8 4! w ~.j i, 1. )t..~ .91 i~`.~ 0, 2 3 T. f.~ 150 i F r ~..~j it, .Lf. 1 ~..)~~•1 tA~}'.~~}( l~I.L~ ~ ~ ~ J 40. 45x 4 C) .74 C) C?!~~ 1 2 9 7 l ) t„Jl 3 r r+~ . 1~,~i„}~..j s 4«7t~ .~:1 ~ .3`I'6 •...•34)t-.L.."PG~ 4 -w• i r ♦ --I ~^r ^;r f 3, 5~..T r 1..~ a..~.~~~..~~~p a 1~`~' 9 t 0 r..f ..r.t... . T'~~.~ d~~ ,1_1F ,.yl ~c.. o ,~i..t t..~ t~ (.)r;..y `~.h. .61 w.a.. ~ (..1 t.f 7 w L~' 955 .i ~ ~ 5r . ~ ti~ 9 t«) ~4) G'.~i~..y a~ ~ t ~'1' C} 0 n~.j Lv-6 r\• L~ .t. ~ ~ .r~ .i s». . t~ t..~ 4 ~ '~7 C ' . . ~..s 6- r~ ,R~, C) - ~a rl 2 l ~ r+ ) 4500 a:..~6 w~~2 1~)..~.A~. 1'1' !+..fl.~ ~...i 8 ( s~ f y t=~ ~1- ~ i. t.1 ~4 ^ G ~3i~1 ~-~i ~3 M Y 4~.J a.4.a 1~w 1~. , J... M. 55. 4") 51 OCj .52 ~ 1, i 07A 561c=a ._.4, f i.~6 90.0 540,C) a?f j 11 1 ?3 r5, 9 -1 .t J •-•dC: ! 95 N 0 '~'j~:)t_a ~ ~r~ M :Z~~► 1 x 4 1 ti ;t~s 00 ~ i i~ i ► c~~ . 4~-~ ~ 1 a 17A. 6 ~ crs - - 5 p hrI S/~~t-~C~ 7 • r~ t 2256 t~~tL1 Ca r ~ 1y-. t ~v~ 1 P"!~.. 14i~ ~ f" f '~''C:l r. t"t L» c.:. .1 i 1.: ' ~'i" he t:i me ca f t= oo1.: et' itrak: i c:y n :i ; tif 3. i'1 UtE_ si T he l.1 r-i d e,v e 1 o r, r=., Gf I L7 Ly nLi t x~ J-1 c: .+nsn TC'N °t`E=: AR' aTORM CAt... f: # RAT IL~~~AL FORNUU'i HY?,~~ OL~GY DATE - 716f37 DE'S:~ GNER = 6. Nf:-~LSON BAS:~ ~ +,4+5+64-7 f"-'ROJ'E:'C°f` NAME ~tEADQI~BF';OL#.w VILL~C-3~ : DICF-MASON i"~OB;! I_.E HOMF f`Rojie.c-l~ Or'~.i F1~DRA SUBAREA 1 3,~ 76 O{y;~~~ ~ ~~PA~~~ER RU~~OFF iDDEFFi CIE:NT ~2?7 TLd• 1'-1L 1--7REA ' Y u PLF ACRES com1~eLJi.J.L J~E R5JO1 FILL C7..7EFJ • I 1.✓ .4 E14{ T a ww.9 7 ' OVf-wf~~LAND FL..U4g1 VALUES Y.aft 5 I~ y 10 N C) I y ~ Y~r CH~~NEL_ F{..,~~ ~~ALUES L - 0 T D m0 COlvEP~~-rf~.t) VAL-UES DtJR - 5 Q ; :n ,r ~ OP) 0. O~'~ L:,qoWs"f f:ING GF1L.C°l.!LA"1" I ~.~3NS U~`a l' E. 7/tS / 8 7 1U E:. SIC;NEfi = G. EICL. SC1{f E+lti 3 TVd F='h:OJECT NAMEE = idll:..ADC3WBRO~l~•:: V:1' IrLAGF UESCRIF'T:CpN DTCV: i'1F~1fiC)iV PvIoL-"(:11..E NCIME f"f;E)JECT QN FL_ORA :C ntei r si•i.. y C.1cr e v. Vi. ri VOUt 3 4:.: L3 r • ca c~ e O7 i n. c c (c Lr . (CU,. ft. a: ) f c. U. ~ l-. ~ " . C- L^' ~f ~_a n.~~~<~' .:.t u :E ~ ~ s. r~~~~ :t .~'4£3 10. C► 6 CD Cj 2 . 24 : .5 i 1.7 5 6 `W:60 1:' S' 6 15.0 C? i: i 1.77 1.98 198 1 540 1441 .20p o 1:L-'c~) C) I 45: 1.62 1 c_ir-) 720 J. :2.Be 25. ~_1 ~::t .L10 l~ r'' .I, .L M 2165 917Er) 12165 l.r Q 1 e o~y i:> 1.04 1.16 22<? 9 :L ~~~~0 :l. 11. :'9 31 5 . C' 2 1 C> C-) .91 .1. 2 23, 3 .t 260 978 4~~~ » t~f 4 r r~.9:~ 91 ~e C) 811 4 5 . C) i i ~ M 7 L!• w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 695 50. C) 0 c ) . c~8 .76 235 6 1 5w~6 5r ~„f .,~i ~ J t f w C~'T a f 1 2 ~..j . l .L .19 a C' 45 .i. 60. c:a •~+6 (r r--.- i- r- ~ ' ^r s -)i"~ .f.~1 .l~<=3 ~ ~ 16C3 V LJ Y~~ / •:.901..) 11 60 N\.s` 6 26517 Aaw 0.r 1C) '...y 1I! 1 / w C) 420() w 1t i~~ .65 71~ 6 2520 26 C'w t..) 4 5 { C) .56 Yt~.~' i r..:.. ~ a:.. ~~ry ~w 4. r. 1 152 7..! .J a.. .f.~S. 1,. ) 480~ j L:S'^; 2901 2880 c ~',l1 M 8 51 Oi. i 58 ~ s.79-17, ._-060 9C). i_~ ~ 40;:j ~ = 4 i N =I t 07 40 F~ c3 9 J NC) 570C) .49 .55 ^31I W :t OC), C) 6 C) c i Cr .48 »54 2 71 3"500 ~i4-1 9 7'1-iE MAXIMUM S"C'C]F;ACE IG 1.4~'~0. ;47s868 Cl.l. C=..1". * T I~~-2 ti. me r_, f c: onc:: er i-tr- at i. u n :i s ama. nutes. 'T'h e- U n ci P v Es 1 ora eca +1 c{w ciurt. s- .6 cw f.s. 'f'f=:N Yk~AR STOf;h1 C,aL_CC. C:i Y-Cu1 ar Char-Inel • iV~:~rr►~-- G. h#E:L.StJN Date-- 7/6r'87 Ar_•-tion Uesc: r- ipt :a. can-- DICK MASt:llu !"IOBT E_E 1-it7ME F'ROJ EC"i" ON F= LORR St i-_ftion- BFaSr. N ~ iar°" wJ'~., ~J/ ft• ( .78 o = n ~~~~=?t~ 5 f tx i' ta i,:♦ew ~w-T~1 ~w .'.raw ~ r... a L.. enU t t i - Bi 3 f t. OLi t1~lt f 3 aw 1 i r -te e 1e v -at:i ca s-i = 73 t_) f t„ Dn=: .42 1 tY fl 1 1 ~ .24 sY f11 V!~, = 3■ 31 f A P. S. H1 \ n= Ili -ftq L. . ' M I~~.y 7II [ I N• ~y♦y 2 yr. tl P. }y~~ f 1 1 -5 r .i:.. i,I.~~ 1 M.G..•...~ y/~~ Y ~6.. '...~\rJ 1 ~.'M I i M t• Subc_ r- it:i ca1. Fl. caw IJn•- ~ 4e-) ft. HV .17 ftr He= .15 -f{« p Ir3 le't: E' leV . *3,0. 32 'f t, i-i e~.-~ dwat er- e1 ev . - -31 . 2 6 ft. rr i t i, caISlope=_ . 00685 i a r- cult:tr C1 ian n e1 r.iam&-- c:a . r•aEI_ SaN Dat e--- 7f E, i 8rr Action ~esCe t'" ip t:L C1 n- D:I CK' t`'I ASCl i'J Mn BILE N L:i lvI C F' F; C?,.7 EC T C1N FLCi RA Sti-i-tt;i or i BAS:L IV 3 ~..~c-,= t~A~~~ w 6; ~f 't~ . i fi t.~~~~~ di. ar cs'7 tp r. G~°~' ~ 1s.~~.8 rFfMsw rz = .012 r q L.enqt h - E30 f t. Clt.t t:l ct. ~ a. ca w l. .i ne e 1e v Gt t:i o n - 31 0 f t. F'ressuire F°:! ow F'r i. ct i on s]. opEa . S'"W 9 V= "t w bti: f.PNSN 1-1 f~• . i4 ft v v „ „ lae= . 1 S f:t. D3ct. .67 4't„ oi_tt: i et el evM C) . C-) 0 ft. HeLaclwiater e:L ev %3 1. 79 f f. .I. n .l. et elev » = 30.52 C irG i..taar° C hzinne1 tJ a-m C NEt_. St:lN lD R. t. F J' % 6 / 3 7 A c -t .i. cj r ; 4$ D esc: r- i. pt ioi s- D:f. C')••:: MAStJ f J I,10D:t L cE i-lCJ MC PM: OJECo T 011\I F t_C±Ri s Stati or,- riAS7:N r cl i av - W 67 4: t . 0::. 1. 3 c= r f „ so rz ~ .012 So= . c°) 'i. ft. f ,F-te 9 t., eri gt h = 13' f t. Ol(tl4--t f1owJ. :i ne eIev~i-ttion= 30 +t.. Dci .54 +t, Ar i = s . ~ . Vn 4 . 2.9 f P. s. f-i F; r : „ 20 f -L„ Dc=-- .54 f t. . rt tw w t~3 s. 4' W V c- 4.28 f .p. !:i» E-I Rt` " Sc.: perc ri t i c_ ,-A. F:t aw Dc_• , s4 f t. Hv= .28 ft. . HE'•?,-=; .26 +tR i n:t r-_.' t e L~'~ ~,l r"~ L,.~ ~~•Y T~~ r Heat~ wa'k er f, leY 31. 2-1 f t_ . C6'' 3. t1 C:: c.t ~ ~ lope= ~ C) ( ) -'?9 :'7 iniand ~ Enc9in~eerin9 . Transmittal - . • South 25 Altamont Spokene, Waahington . 509 535•1410 99202 ' • - T0: DATE 57t,t1UF-- 1I~~I ~lu~~u~~1uuG I~EPT: ~ . 1~ g I l 3'EFaF~25o~. S P,.> K-A su F-, wA • 91?2d/ ~ ~tv~3,~K U~c.t~16F . RECEIVED PROJECT. /3'1~ ` . A01614AF ArNa ~.JUN 161987 ATTENT ION : A)p I SpU Cowrty. Etineering Gentlemen: We are sending enclosed under separate cover copies of the following: Description / B1 uel i ne Pri nts Copy of Letter ~j p,pl¢1VA6E S74,DII Original Drawing Contract Documents Work Authorization Report. - , No. Copies Date Descript'ion - S/TW pCW . ~ ~ 6~l' 2 a~~ AA0 ~ Z co/ o/afkk~pe Request4e'17 Act ion . / / Information / / Review & Comments Distribution Written Approval / / Signature & Return Remarks -7.-s = -5;6oA*;A/L1 ~-e a~~~~~ dAZ ~ -cL ` 4DO ~ . ya&' . Sincerely, , INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. By : . i - ~ Standard Drawings ' . ; 14 ~ 3 = O" ~ ~ 8•• i 1. - 8" i g•~~ 4,. : ~t i ao . A A 'v ~ o N co t Plan Ploce Cement Concrete Coliar ~ 2= l'la. C1059 5("/2) a5 dlrec-t¢d. T_ 8.. ~ ~~-6'~~~~ Metal Frame g Grnte f8" Oiam.Outlet Pipe ~i4 Mortar . <V ~ -T : D Q ~:0~' 4' 'Q.:.: ~ . p,_ ~O. • , Cemen} Concre+e Class 5(IV2).i ase Cast in Place - b.~: •.'O~. Q':' . ~:j•: . b ~ . . . . . . . . . . q . . . , ~ r 6~+-8.. I- 1._ e.. I e,. i 3._ 0.. i Section A-A ~ ao" -1 ao- 1 y~ 4 816 4 8•16 ~v 4•8 16 a 8 16 ' aD OD , Q Q Do Nor Sc~F 24'~ - 24.. - ~0 , w ' ~D io ID ao v N ~ ch ~ O Q C\j L N STANDARD PLAN NO. 57 °0 4•8•16 4•8 t6 a 816 4•8 t6 °0 . Q v First Course Alternate Courses Type IV-A Curb inlet B1ock Placement Detoils Masonry Construction . DIV. VII / 65 21 Jun93 MEMORANDUM TO Planning (Stacy B]ordahl) FROM DeveloPment Services (Ed ParrY0p RE ZE-5285 1 We are forwarding the original mylars and a xeroxed mylar set for signatures by Planning 2 Please return the signed xeroxed mylars to Dick Mason at Inland Pacific Engineering - ~ RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED: DATE : Il C~ ''L I I GI ~ , ~ INLAND PACte'IC ENGINEERING s TRANSMITTAL -W~ South 25 Altamont 4Spotcane, WA 99202 (509)535-1410 FAX(509) 5345-1432 Letter F~ FaIRi,CEEV 17.-* D TO DATE 61171~~U N 18 1991 S ~ ~ 1'OK4NE ~611N~r~NG~; ~ ATTENTION• Fe,-71jvG'•cv1 ~ ~y. AE FAX No eko PROJECT. ~VI - IPE Proj No We are sendsng enclosed under separate cover copies of the following• Description F~ Blueline Prints ~ Copy of Letter ~ x Onginal Drawing F-I Contract Documents ~ F-I Work Authonzation ~ Report F-I nlo. Copies Descriptlon ~J Requested Action Information ~ Review & Comments ~ Distribution F-I Wntten Approval ~ Signature & Return F-1 Remarks Aaq/-1"Z4 2r ,~r S , Sincerely, Note If any of the copies are illegible or you do not receNe INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC number of pages including this page please contact us immediately at (509) 535-1410 By. ~ . ~ ~ ~ r S P O K A N E C O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGWEER • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C Hormann, P E, County Enguleer Demus M Scott, P E, Ihrector June 11, 1993 Richard Mason, P E SUBJECT ZE-5285, Meadowbrook Village Mobile Home Park Approval Gentlemen A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for this project has been accomplished, and the plans are ready for approval, subject to the attached conditions Per my conversation with Mr Steve Soltys of your office, I am returning the mylars unstamped if you would like to have a stamped reproducible copy of the plans, please return the original mylars and a sepia, I will stamp both the originals and the sepia, and return the stamped sepia to you I am also returning a stamped copy of the blueline plans and the drainage calculations, I have retained a copy of these, as well as the basin map, for our files If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600 Thank you ~ Very truly yours, Ronald C Hormann, P E Spokane County Engineer Edward ?J1 , P E #%Jr Plans Review Engineer encls Plans (1 set) Calculations (1 set) Condttions (1 page) cc koject file reviewer (comments only) W 1026 Broadway Ave Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715 REVIEW COMVIENTS SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT # ZE-5285 REVIEWER Ed Parrv PROJECT NAME Meadowbrook Villaize DATE 11 Jun 93 REVIEW # 2 PAGE # 1 of 1 1 Due to site constraints, pipe flows less than the 4 fps and backwater surface elevations less the 75 ft below grate elevation (as required by the spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management Manual), will be accepted for this project This exception to the standards applies only to Project #ZE-5285, and is not intended to establish a precedent on any other current or future projects STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATONS for MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE May 14, 1993 -~i • s~--- ' : T ar 1' r 04 wASkr ~ ~0 i - ~ cl ~ ~ VZ~OvE:D~ 150 ~ 29 s Fss SF ~ ~ O°',~d~ C~ ENG ` 0 A L BY i, ~ EXPI RES 10. qy ~ \ d~, C Pa: YV yiB1 NCT,r=Y 1HL t~ER.`",T i_NC" N;c 2 , r d~ ~"~'•j~L; ",::r' i n CG~ j:~Tr.L'^ iON w~ Prenared Bv RECEIVED Inland Pacific Engineenirtg Compa,ty MAY 1 9 19ql 25 S. Altamont Spokane~ WA 99202 SPOOM COUNTY ENGINEEA (509)535-1410 , COMPUTATION OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS Basin A Road Impervious Area 29,312 sf Lot Improvements - Average Home 1350 sf/lot - Ave. Dnveway 720 - Ave. Deck 128 - Misc. Sidewalk 50 2248 sf/lot say 2250 Total Lot Improvements 2250 x 30` = 67,500 sf Total Basin Area 173,250 sf Grass/Landscapmg 173,250 - 299312 - 67,500 = 76,438 sf Composite C for Basin A=1(29.312 + 67,500) + 1(764381 = 55 173,250 * Tota1 lots wnthin Basin Ais 30 mcluding manager's space 20A a.nd excluding lots 1& 2 and half of lots 3 a.nd 31. Basin Al Road Impervious Area 7189 sf Total Lot Improvements 2250 x 6` = 13,500 sf Total Basm Area 30,420 sf Grass/Landscaping 309420 - 79189 - 13,500 = 9,731 sf Composite C for Basin A1 =n189 + 13.500) +,1(9,731) _.64 30,420 PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT: Meadowbrook Village BASIN: A Tot. Area 3.98 acres Imp. Area 29312 sq ft C = 0.55 CASE 1 0 ft. Overland Flow Ct = 0.15 L = 0 ft. n = 0.40 S = 0.005 Tc = 0.00 min., by Equation 3-2 of Guidelines 200 ft. Gutter Flow Z = 50 n = 0.016 S = 0.0080 d = 0.311 ft. W A Q Tc Tc total I Qc 15.56 2.42 6.96 1.16 5.00 3.18 6.96 Qpeak f or Case 1= 6.96 cf s INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING BOWSTRING METHOD PROJECT: Meadowbrook Village DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: A DESIGNER: SPS DATE: 05/14/93 Time Increment (min) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 5.00 Outflow (cfs) 1.6 Design Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 3.98 Impervious Area (sq ft) 29312 'C' Factor 0.55 '208' Volume Provided Area * C 2•189 Time Time Inc. Intens. Q Devel. Vol.In Vol.Out Storage (min) (sec) (in/hr) (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 5.00 300 3.18 6.96 2798 480 2318 5 300 3.18 6.96 2798 480 2318 10 600 2.24 4.90 3442 960 2482 15 900 1.77 3.87 3882 1440 2442 20 1200 1.45 3.17 4133 1920 2213 25 1500 1.21 2.65 4243 2400 1843 30 1800 1.04 2.28 4330 2880 1450 35 2100 0.91 1.99 4386 3360 1026 40 2400 0.82 1.79 4491 3840 651 45 2700 0.74 1.62 4539 4320 219 50 3000 0.68 1.49 4617 4800 -183 2081 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required 1208' Storage volume = Impervious Area x.5 in / 12 in/ft 1221 cu ft 208' Storage Volume Provided cu ft DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum Storage Required by Bowstring 2482 cu ft Number and Type of Drywells Required 2 Single 1 Double INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT: Meadowbrook Village BASIN: A1 Tot. Area 0.70 Acres Imp. Area 7189 SF C = 0.64 CASE 1 80 ft. Overland Flow Ct = 0.15 L = 80 ft. n = 0.40 S = 0.005 Tc = 5.88 min., by Equation 3-2 of Guidelines 210 ft. Gutter f low Z1 = 33.0 Z2 = 4.5 n = 0.016 S = 0.008 d = 0.188 ft. A R Q Tc Tc total I Qc 0.66 0.09 1.13 2.04 7.92 2.52 1.13 Qpeak f or Case 1= 1.13 cf s CASE 2 Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentration less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow =.90 (3. 18) (Imp. Area) = 0.47 cfs So, the Peak f low for the Basin is the greater of the two f lows, 1.13 cfs INLAND PACIFIC ENGINTsERING r . P3pe F1ow Grate 1 - Gr8te 2 Flow 1.130 cfS Diameter 0.67 ft Type PVC Slope 0.0050 ftJft n 0.0140 L 78.00 ft d f dia v Depth of flow,d 1.00 ft 1.50 2.43 Flowzng Full 0,67 ft 1.00 2.43 Critxcal Depth 0.500 ft 0.75 4.03 Nor'rnal aepth 0.553 ft 0.83 3.55 HWc 0.877 ft HWn 0.863 ft OUTLET CONTROL iNLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING w Pipe Flow Grate 2- Outlet Flow 1.130 cfs Diameter 0.67 ft Type PVC Slope 0.0050 ft/ ft n 0.0100 L 78.00 ft d/dia V Depth of f low, d 1.00 ft 1.50 2.43 Flowing Full 0.67 ft 1.00 2.43 Critical Depth 0.500 ft 0.75 4.03 Normal Depth 0.553 ft 0.83 3.65 HWc 0.877 ft HWn 0.863 ft OUTLET CONTROL INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING Backwater Calculation Sheet - Meadowbrook Village Pipe Segment 2-Out 1-2 1 Q 1.13 1.13 2 Length 78.00 78.00 3 Pipe Size 0.67 0.67 4 n 0.010 0.01 5 Outlet E1. 30.00 30.39 6 Inlet E1. 30.39 30.78 Slope 0.005 0.005 7 Barrel Area 0.35 0.35 8 Barrel Vel. 3.21 3.24 9 Vel. Head 0.16 0.16 10 TW E1. 31.00 31.53 11 Frict. loss 0.39 0.40 12 Entr. HGL El. 31.39 31.93 13 Entr. Head loss 0.14 0.15 14 Exit Head Loss 0.16 0.16 15 Outlet Ctrl. El. 31.69 32.24 Inlet Ctrl. HW 0.88 0.88 16 Inlet Ctrl. El. 31.27 31.66 17 Appr. Vel. Head 0.16 0.00 18 Bend Head Loss 0.00 0.00 19 Junct. Head Loss 0.00 0.00 20 HW Elev. 31.53 32.24 Grate El. 32.00 32.62 Freeboard 0.47 0.38 SP4KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON -SHEET NUMBER 76 ~ I ~ k ;',a F .I__R :15 - - _ F. - - - - _ ~ ~ , , f ~ ~ i ~ i ,1.► ~ ~ ' ~ , ' ~ ~ . ~ ~j ~ . i~•t t ~ ' PA " E. . ~ . , a ~ s 1J 1~~~ ~ S. r• `I~yy~ i.~ ' ~ ~ •i ~ ~ ~ • , ~ f : ~ i / i./'~ ~ ~~y '+~•t;. ' 1 ~~,~rtAY-:a..•r1~ S ~ ~ 1 -R.~ 'rJAG►iEE• IP11N0 ~•~tf, n,'~T 4r'- r►~ ~ i~ - ~j-- ~T 1 ~ir' ••r.. ~ » ~ . r~ ~1~ ~b LL~9~ t~ ~ i'~ ~~F7 S I w, r iLy, j~~~~,Q~ I ~+it ~ ~K ~ ~ ~ . .r~ l i 1 ~ ~.~•~1~ ~ i Il',' . f ,4. . 1 W:~ ' ~ . A R~,. y" - ~1 ~~!~1{, '4^ p,~( ~.~4.A Y. I. i ~,{1, ~](1 ;;y{i 1},` - t .,Fr U' "74 f ~ ~ ~~y„ ' L "i1C' ~ , ~~h [ M ~i`a ~Si~- }`J~r' ' L' , .t.~i ►~i`'~,~, .,~,r . L,~ ~ . 9, • E 1` ~ ~~'•t ~ Z~ + A: , ; ~ ~ .i: ~ ~ • a i ~ ~ Sli • ~ i..~r • ,~;A~ ~ . ~ ~l ~ , ~ (3gAc, { . ' t; , r~s , ~,4 k :x ~C J ~,I, ~ - -'A~t . ! ~ t ~ . i ~1 ~i(17B ~ * Qm8 r 1 ~''~`~~-~,~~1~,~~~'~y ~I f•. i -~,r /~6,3;;. yf~' ;r . <1 ~ ckc~'s;~;,r~, 'L ~ y~'~,~~ ' l. i» _ , { f Y y' r " r r . ~ ~ ,F~ ~ a• ~ 1~ ; f - ~ ~CCIltlBl VBllBy 24~+~~ < '~r ~ PC'{y ~~L~? ~ ' 1 ~~~,~~~-r~. ~ti~ ~ ; '~r.~ ~ ~ c J r ~r I ~ 'yt. ' 8Ch00l , GRIg~~~~.' . y . ti • ~ ~ ~ 1 f K ~ ~ ~ . ~ M ~r ~ n ; r . f • , , , ; . _ . . . E. . I ~ r~;at~*~~..c ~~s~ ~p~''t~ ~~Ar ,n~..~~~~ ;~~~~~I 3 ~fiY,Y ~~r,~~ A,r " ~ 5 ~ i~ 'we R0. (Il r~ , ~X%y_ ,~1ti w ~G S : "1't"'~~, r.o .yt~. d f. ' u r ~7~` ~ w ~ .~5~' ' ~~B' ,,~7f,~~, ~ j '~'~r r~•,• w,~~l. w ~o' p H~S~ ' ,~y~ ~ ~t. i ~ ',X 1 '~,,~,.~~y~~ ~ ~ ~ ~y,' ~H g ~ r ~ ' SzE• ~ ~pt~ ~ .Yy t ~ ~is8 : Bs8 T ~ ~j!'.a' • ~ ; aC~,r , d ~p 1 ti ; ~ ~i `Gm8 bhb Mc ~t ~ 1 ' f. } .5~'.j'~ ' ~ ~ t }.yy/ ` ~ ~ .1 , - ~ ~ ~ , .~j. •/h ' n~ ~ _ ~ 7,~'~`~~ f ~ ~ ! MzA,'~ ~j ~ ~j3J~,'I ` ~ rrl ~ 1" ~f' ~ X•. IL Psg:~~• a~-• • ~i , • ~ , ~ ~ . , _ ;y~~'.r,; PsA x _i ,•C `Bs0 ~ G ~ ~ J,4:' !A-Aft UhB t ^ ''=r4 } ~ ~ ~i' fPsAy'n Bs9 • ~ r . } '~`a 1 1~ « i • t , . , ► ~)1 : .,,•~~r1r ' ~ , tlk, CuR~~ 1'~'''~' ~ j~ i~a,r~ w.,~ - y-. ~n Q+~ PSA . ~ l `•r' ~"y±~ ..~a, ~ r" ~t ~r~ /~5•~ ~ ' t ~ ! ~ .M .f -t ~ - • . \ ~ 1 1~ - i' ;G S~1,J~ • ~V ~'~18 I ~ ' .y~~f~ s. `~1`J 'Wt ' R 4 4.~ ~ 7l~,~ i. S . { ~r7. i~ ~ . . ~ ' ti..paQ• M .f ~Y ~1' ~r~t 'ti R`:~r- I:II^r~,, "'2~~ ~ S13Y1~ , ~'7~\'~ S~t~•~- ~ .'j fr~~~ ~I11A i' 't `;r r/~ ~~~11n ,.ri. ~ ~ 'P . ,~Sl~. • ~g , '1, , t(3 , } ` * . ` r J~~.,,~ ~ ~ F. a ° ~ n 1~ , ~•ti; ~~~1 r~ r, Kji ~1y i~ . `i I~ti r~y `e+,.MBCi,t~•~ P:, 4 ^'1. ' ~ h. Sk f ,r ' , 1 1 .f t ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ • - ~ ~~x`•~ a~~~k rr ~ ~,~u•. ~ M;' - 7 ~ •f%'~ r~ r•f' ` ~ . ~ .?Cir ' '~A . SAL - HfiR 'J P B s ~~:~!f' ► ~ +y'Jt~~~" ~i'~:~\ ~ ~ , 4L ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ I , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •',i(N'' 'LI C ' . ~ Bs6 w;r~ r~' ~ ~k t~ ~ti~: r ~ ~ ~ . ''1*t~`"~'~„~ . ~ B., 't' 0 lrcF!~~'"t F~nA Po ~ ~ i . . m9 ~ t_ '~r1(~ ~ ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E •~}F ~ , ~ . i 4 CuB n ~ ~ i~ • -:w • , ~ U ' ~~N+ G y f I~ti., ~ BsB, ;i'~➢,;~ 4~~,'~ ~ X a a 4 • i ' ~ ~r , ~ " . ~f~('~1 s. f,. •A i;~'' ti . _ ~ > Ps8 f/`'~ J .,S'; ~r1 f' 1" ti~IL 1 ~~i:.y;' •j ~ ,'~'~r =1~M1.' t-fi~n W w w ~ JUE' ~ ~ + ~ } ~ t ~ ~~X• i ` r f 5~6Kr ~f Fj t ~4'~, r'V~~ ~.~gEB ` " ..l ' •`S"~ t ch~~~~ ° u1~•±~ ~2 ~ ~ 54.r~.•- '•~k~ . t ' • PsA . • ` °«t:.x~'~~ - < ;,w . r ~ • ' - ~ w~~ t~ r ~L~ t:r .i:+ 'f, , `K~ ' (~'(-~i u .y~ t' ~',v ~ ~~C;°J~~ t ';~7r1AI , ~u•' ~ti ti. a -ze , . ; ' ~ ~;y. . . .ti •.iY ~A , _ ~i'~`: r IN• ~n- -,-,.g ,PeA ~ ~ "'~y w ~ ~ __-.-.r- ' • p{~' . ~ •a+~ i - % ' RoS~ Y; . Ml,. , Lw, . I y~ i~~• . 'c, , p. ~ ps • ~r POA~ 1 ! yt; t~ " y n0 hK~, , ~~~'S •yl,. „ f'~ °t~ . jti , ~I«;/~ ~ ►1~j ~ Ws8 I ~ , •t ~ ~ ,CL18 -.~1'~ ~ t~~, ` ' ' f • C • Y ~ . ~ : . ~ ~1 ~.^1F li~ ~j ~li~rJr'A~~ - ~ C,• 3r~h. ' ~D' ~ . ;M~vJ~..~Jr•'~~/~.~~ . t .~r 1 I q •ft ~ f ~ ~ ~ .l I ~ ' ~1f ~I t , ~ PsA Bptj i `F it I~r..o y, 'n 'L2``4 r►. ~iata= jll .r~ 4r {i ,l'', , • , ,1Cr nC" ii ,r ~a' w ..ti a Nrf" . ,'t t REVIEW COMMENTS - SPOKANE COUNTY FNGINECI~ ~NGINFrRING SERVICES PR~`JJEC`T" ZE-5285 R.EVIEWER: Ed Pamf PROJECT NAME; Meadowbrook Villa.ee DATE: ~23 Am 93 REVIEW 1 PAGE # i of 2 PIANS Sheet 214: 1_ Flans need P.E. st,amp, signature, date 2. Indicate benchmark 3. Indicate existing R/W, ~ew P,V, on Steen 4. Indicate street name signs at intersectin,g streets 5. Has the Fire District appraved the 30' cul-de-sac radius? 6. Provide statioa/vffset callvut for drainage structures 7. Blueberry Pl.: a. Is 32.62 the #low lane or inlet depression elevation? b. Pipe has 0,4' +of cover; will this be adequate given that vehic~~s will l.ikely be parked overit? Coordinate grate #'s in calcs with plans 9. Structure at Lot 15A / Lot 15 ,a, Grate won't see any► overiand flows due tn elevation -should be a solid lacking lid in thi.s case b. Pipe has 0.6' cover c. I.E..'s could be matched 10. GPA "A" detail: a. Proviide erosion cvntral at gipe: ou tlet b. Indicate ground slape 11. Sidewalk inlet detad: Pravide callout on p1ans Sheet 4/4 1. Revise approaal 1alcacks to r+eflect r~ew phasing . ' REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT ZE-5285 REV I EW 1 DATE: 23 Apr 93 Page 2 of 2 CALCULATIONS l. Need P.E. stamp, signature, date 2. Pravide SCS map 3. Basin Map: a. Confirm drainage at west property line. Spot shots indicate drainage from Steen Road flows onto site, and that on-site Basin A1 should extend to the property line b. Indicate T, paths, length, slope 4. Basin A: a. Density of 29 units 3.98 acres = 7.2S; C=.60 b. Consideration of real-world flow Tc times (some length to the overland and gutter flows) might reduce to required pond volume c. Gutter section has two Z values: street slope = 41; gutter face = 4 5. Basin A1: s, Density of 6 units =.69 acres > 9; C=.70 ~ ~ INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING. TRANSMITTAL South 25 Altamont .4 Spolane, WA W-02 .(509)535-1410 . FAX(509) 535-I942 Letter _xj Fax F~ T0: Spokane County Engineers DATE: May 18, 1993 1026 W. Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 ATTENTION: rtr. L•'dward Parry P.E. FAX No.: PROJECT: zE 52-85 Meadowbrook Village MHP IPE Pt'oj. No.: We are sending W enclosed under separate cover copies of the following: Description ~ Blueline Prints 0 Copy of Letter ~ Original Drawing ~ Contract Documents F-I ~ Work Authorization Pq Report No. Copies Description 2 sets of blueline prints consisting of 4 shtets per- set 1 set of original drawings for approval stamps and signatiires 1 set of marked prints from first submittal 1 set of prints showing original approval (previousl.y submitted) 1 basin map ~ 1 letter addressing Countv c~~mmeT~t-s Crorr. first r~~vie~ti Requested Action ~ ~ Information F] Review & Comments ~ Distribution ~ Written Approval F-] Signature & Return F-] Remarks I)ear Ed: Assuming these plans are now approvable, please stamp sheet "L of 4 with County approval stamp and initial your approval and current date on the Phase II and Phase III sienature block on sheet 4 of 4. Please send a memo to Stacev at County Planning indicating your approval of the revised plans, so I can get Planning approval. I will need to get the originals back to pet Planning's signature and to to make 2nd originals for myself. Please call if you have questions. Sincerely, Note: If any of the copies are illegible or you do not receive INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. number of pages including this page please contact us immediately at (509) 535-1410. By: • Rich3rd L. Masan RECEVED MAY ?A 1993 * 1 seC of calculations marked up fr.om first review sPOKW oouNnr ENGMER - ~ . INL.AND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COOJF INC, South 75 AItcirTiont Street Spokane. Washington 99202 (509) 535- i-: 1!.; ~ R? ~ May 18, 1993 Spokane County Engineers W. 1026 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 ATTN: Mr. Edward J. Parry P.E. Plans Review Engineer RE: ZE 52-85 Meadowbrook Village MHP-2nd Submittal ~ Dear Mr. Parry: I will respond to 1 st review comments in the order in which they were presented. PLAN Sheet 2/4: 1. Plans have been stamped and dated. 2. Bench mark shown on streetlight standard located at southwest comer of Meadowbrook Lane and Aspen Place. 3. Existing and new R/W on Steen Road is 25 feet wide from centerline on the east side adjacent to proposal. A 5 foot strip was dedicated by me to Spokane County in 1989 when the original plans were approved. The east haif RW width has been added. 4. Street signs are mounted on street light standards at appropriate locations and have been added to plans. 5. Fire District #1 has approved 30 foot radius cul-de-sac on revised plans. See new sheet 3/4 as approved by Paul Chase on 3-16-93. 6. Station/offset callout added for two Type IV•A curb inlets. Exact location of drywells proposed for GPA "A" is not critical. Added 30' minimum spacing. Revised slopes of 8" piping in area of Lots 15A and 16. 7. Blueberry PI.: a& b)Elev. 32.62 is flow line (gutter line). TYPE IV-A inlet is in sump condition. Top elevation of inlet is 0.33' higher than gutter at 32.95 (see sidewalk inlet detail an sheet 2). Invert of pipe at this location Engineering • Plarinrng 0 Surveying • Environmenfo! Analysis has been revised to 30.78. Therefore cover over 8" pipe is approximately 1.50 feet. Also, the first 60 plus feet of pipe will be under concrete driveway. 8. See revised calculations. 9. Structure at Lot 15A/Lot 16: a) Solid cover could be used but is not required. Locking device is not warranted. b) Pipe inverts revised. Cover is approximately 1 foot. This area will be yard area with nothing but yard traffic. c) I. E.'s revised to match. 10. GPA "A" detail: a) 4 ft. X 4 ft. X 4" thick concrete splash pad added. b) Ground slope added; max 3:1. 11. Sidewalk inlets called out near entrance. Structure in Blueberry Place will have a ~ top similar to sidewalk inlet. Sheet 4/4 1. All three phases of these revised plans have already been signed off by all departments except the Engineers and Planners. The important issue is that the entire plan is approved. Please accept the signature blocks as shown. _CALQULATIONS 1. Calculations have been stamped. 2. SCS map added. 3. Basin map: a) Steen Road exists as a gravel road with a crown. There aren't enough spot elevations to fully define the shape of the road; however the street does have a gentle swale type ditch along the east side. tn addition, a landscape detail and lot regrading along the east right of way line of Steen (on private property) prevent stormwater from coming onto the project. b) See basin map. 4. Basin A: a,b, & c) See revised catculations. _ , ~ ~ I , I 5. Basin A1: a) See revised calculations. If you have questions concerning the calculations, please contact Mr. Steve Soltys. Any other questions should be directed to me. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, Richard L. Mason , . • PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT: Meadowbrook Village f~kvAj BASIN: A Tot. Area 3.98 acres Imp. Are 29 C = .40 - f~ CASE 1 . 0 ft. Overland Flow Ct = 0.15 L = 0 ft. n = 0.40 S = 0.040 Tc = 0.00 min., by Equation 3-2 of Guidelines 0 ft. Gutter Flow Z = 36 V n = 0.016 S = 0.0130 d = 0.161 ft. w A Q Tc Tc total I Qc 5.80 0.47 1.10 0.00 5.00 3.18 5.06 Qpeak for Case 1 5.06 cfs CASE 2 Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentrati.on less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow =.9(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 1.93 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 5.06 cfs ~ ; IIYLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING BOWSTRING METHOD PROJECT: Meadowbrook Village DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: A DESIGNER: SPS DATE: 02/04/93 Time Increment ( min ) 5 Time of Conc. (min) 5.00 Outflow (cfs) 0.6 Desiqn Year Flow 10 Area (acres) 3.98 Impervi,ous Area (sq ft) 29312 ' C' Factor 0.4 ' 208' Volume Provided Area * C 1.592 Time Time Inc. Intens. Q Devel. Vo1.In Vo1.0ut Storage (mi.n) (sec) (in/hr) (cfs) (cu ft) (cu ft) (cu ft) 5.00 300 3.18 5.06 2035 180 1855 5 300 3.18 5.06 2035 180 1855 10 600 2.24 3.57 2503 360 2143 15 900 1.77 2.82 2823 540 2283 20 1200 1.45 2.31 3006 720 2286 25 1500 1.21 1.93 3086 900 2186 30 1800 1.04 1.66 3149 1080 2069 35 2100 0.91 1.45 3190 1260 1930 40 2400 0.82 1.31 3266 1440 1826 45 2700 0.74 1.18 3301 1620 1681 50 3000 0.68 1.08 3358 1800 1558 55 3300 0.64 1.02 3466 1980 1486 60 3600 0.61 0.97 3595 2160 1435 65 3900 0.60 0.96 3823 2340 1483 I 70 4200 0.58 0.92 3972 2520 1452 75 4500 0.56 0.89 4103 2700 1403 80 4800 0.53 0.84 4136 2880 1256 85 5100 0.52 0.83 4306 3060 1246 90 5400 0.50 0.80 4380 3240 1140 95 5700 0.49 0.78 4526 3420 1106 100 6000 0.48 0.76 4663 3600 1063 208' DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Required '208' Storage Volume = Impervi.ous Area x.5 in / 12 in/ft 1221 cu ft 208' Storage Volume Provided 1247.5 cu ft @.5' DEPTH 2495.0 cu ft@ 1.0' DEPT DRYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN ST Maximum Storage Required by Bowstri 2286 cu ft Number and Type of Drywells Require 1 Single Double INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING ~ PEAK FLOW CALCULATION PROJECT:Meadowbrook Village BASIN: A1 Tot. Area 0.70 acres ~y Imp. Are ft C = 0.40 ~ CASE 1 0 ft. Overland Flow Ct = 0.15 L = 0 ft. n = 0.40 S = 0.040 Tc = 0.00 min., by Equation 3-2 of Guidelines 0 ft. G utter Flo w Ce Z = 36 n = 0.016 S = 0.0130 d = 0.149 ft. w A Q Tc Tc total I Qc 5.35 0.40 0.89 0.00 5.00 3.18 0.89 Qpeak for Case 1 0.89 cfs ~ CASE 2 Case 2 assumes a Time of Concentrati.on less than 5 minutes so that the peak flow =.9(3.18)(Imp. Area) = 0.47 cfs So, the Peak flow for the Basin is the greater of the two flows, 0.89 cfs ~ I INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING , ' C]rC1.11~~ ChannPl ~rate 2 - Oi.ltlet F14W 0.$90 GfS D]a1[leter 0.67 ft Slope 0.4091 f't f ft n 0.0100 L 78,00 ft d/di.a A R Q v I)epth of flow,d 0.60 ft 4.90 ❑.3313 0.1345 1.24 3.73 Flowing FuLl 0.67 ft 1.00 0.3526 0,1122 1.17 3.31 Crit1C~ ~epth 0.442 ft 0,66 0.2469 0,1301 0.89 3.61 NoLialGi D4.pt11 0.369 i4 0.55 0.1987. 0i11529 0r89 3.48 Hwc 0.745 ft INLET CONTROL HWn 0.836 ft HWp ~ 'i i INLANI7 PACIFIC ENGINEERING e Circular Channel Grate 1- Grate 2 Flo w 0.890 cfs Diameter 0.67 ft Slope 0.0091 ft/ft n 0.0100 L 78.00 ft d/dia A R Q V Depth of flow,d 0.60 ft 0.90 0.3313 0.1345 1.24 3.73 Flowing Full 0.67 ft 1.00 0.3526 0.1122 1.17 3.31 Critical Depth 0.442 ft 0.66 0.2469 0.1301 0.89 3.61 Normal Depth 0.369 ft 0.55 0.1987 0.1189 0.89 4.48 HWc 0.745 ft INLET CONTROL -HWn 0.836 ft HWp ft INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING , , Backwater Calculation Sheet - Meadowbrook Village Pipe Segment 2-Out 1-2 1 Q 0.89 0.89 2 Length 78 78 3 Pipe Size 0.67 0.67 4 n 0.010 0.010 5 Outlet El. 30.00 30.81 6 Inlet El. 30.71 31.52 Slope 0.0091 0.0091 7 Barrel Area 0.35 0.35 8 Barrel Vel. 2.52 2.52 9 Vel. Head 0.10 0.10 10 TW El. 31.00 31.46 11 Frict. loss 0.24 0.24 12 Entr. HGL El. 31.24 31.70 13 Entr. Head loss 0.09 0.09 14 Exit Head Loss 0.10 0.10 15 Outlet Ctrl. El. 31.43 31.88 Inlet Ctrl. HW 0.75 0.75 16 Inlet Ctrl. El. 31.46 32.27 17 Appr. Vel. Head 0.00 0.00 18 Bend Head Loss 0.00 0.00 19 Junct. Head Loss 0.00 0.00 20 HW Elev. 31.46 32.27 _ Grate El. '-'""32.00 32.62 ~ Freeboard' 0.55 0.35 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING ,t e i ~ - . S P O K N IE C O U N T Y OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINGER • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WOKKS DEPARTMENT Ronald C. Hormann, P.E., County fingineer Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director Date: 2 3/*g3 l21 GNe+m A E. SUBJECT: F:6 ~~~5t~t~i - ~sT ~ llW G1~~~~-~- v~UACiE ~F. Gentlemen: A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above-referenced plat, short - plat, binding site plans and/or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corrections and resubmit them to tbis office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are - resubmitted, mark all cba-nges on the revised lDrint in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Very truly yours, Ronald C Hormann, P. E. Spokane County Engineer W~ Edward i4 4 . , Jr., P.E. 5(~,c~r~~~ Plans Review Engineer 2 s k\w\f\review.ltr W. 1026 Broadway Ave. Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 456-4715 I • REVIEW COMMENTS SPOKA.NE COUNTY ENGINEER ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECI' ZE-5285 REVIEWER: Ed Parrv PROJECT NAME: Meadowbrook Village DATE: 23 Anr 93 REVIEW 1 PAGE # 1 of 2 PLANS Sheet 2/4: 1. Plans need P.E. stamp, signature, date 2. Indicate benchmark 3. Indicate existing R/W, new R/W, on Steen 4. Indicate street name signs at intersecting streets 5. Has the Fire District approved the 30' cul-de-sac radius? 6. Provide station/offset callout for drainage structures 7. Blueberry -Pl.: a. Is 32.62 the flow line or inlet depression elevation?_ b. Pipe has 0.4.' of cover; will this be adequate given that vehicles will likely be . parked over it? 8. Coordinate grate #'s in calcs with plans 9. Structure at Lot 15A / Lot 15 a. Grate won't see any overland flows due to elevation - should be a solid locking lid in this case b. Pipe bas 0.6' cover c. I.E.'s could be matched 10. GPA "A" detail: a. Provide erosion control at pipe outlet b. Indicate ground slope 11. Sidewaik inlet detail: Provide callout on plans Sheet 4/4 1. Revise approval blocks to reflect new phasing REVIET!' COMMi'iN1 S PR41JE4T ZE-5285 n EVIE!'■ I - DA'I'E. 23 Apr 93 P'age 2 of 2 CALCT4] LA'I'iONS t. Need P.E. stamp, signature, date 2. Pxovide SCS map 3. Basin Map: . a. Confirm drainage at west property lixYe. Spot shots indicate drainage fram Steen Road f1ows onto site, and that on-site SasXn AI shouXd extend to the property line b. Indicate Tr . paths, leagth, slope - 4. Basin A: _ a. Density of 29 units : 3.98 acres = 7.28; C .60 b. Consideration of real-warld flaw Tc times (some Iength to the averland and gutter flvurs) might reduce to required pond vvlume c. Gutter section has two Z values: street slape =,41; gutter face = 4 5. Basin A1: , a. Density of 6 units ~ .69 acres > 9; C _ .70 ' - ; a 1 SIIBMITTAL CHECRLI8T PROJECT # ;66 REVIEW I ~ REVIEWER: I DATE : ALA" Z PROJECT: PROJECT SPONSOR: CA oro TEL PROJECT ENGINEER (Road & Drainage Plans) 12a TEL # PROJECT SURVEYOR (Plat) TEL # GENERAL ITEMS YES NO N/A 1. The $100.00 fee for plans review has been paid to Spokane County for this submittal. 2. An agreement to pay fees has been submitted to Development Engineering Services. 3. I have noted the plans in, plans out dates on the pink sheet in the file. ~ 4. The pld"ns and calmations are stamped and signed a Professional Engineer? ~ 5. The developer has signed and approved the road and drainage plans. ~ 6. There are no conflicts between the proposed drainfields and any drainage ditches on the plat. ~ 7. Bowstring calculations by developer are in the file for this review. ~ 8. Vertical curve stopping sight distance calculations by developer are in file for this review. J 9. Horizontal & vertical alignment sight distance calculations by developer are in file for this review. i I loa. The f i 1e cor►ta ins a Spokane Coun~~ ~~ction Map. , 10b. The fi le canta irrs aSpvkan+e County Assessors' s Map . _ lac. The file contains an aerial photo af the propased prvject area. 11a. Froject is located in urban bvundary area. , ~ lib. Project is 1ocated out of urban baundary area. ~ 12. List any d~sigrt deviation requests and their status: 13. Locate the Findings and order for the proj ect and list any unusual conrlitivns; jb"~07) T6 5*,-W Ike-t=K -~=r , , , 2 ROAU PLAN SUBMITTAL ~ 1. List any roads that must be designed and crnstructed on th~ project. R{3Aa NA.ME CLASSIFICAT2Otw]]` WIDTH [3E5IGN MAXIMUM STOPPING SIGHT REQ' D SPEED GRADE DISTANCE f r f r ' ~ . 2. Planning conditions require submissior~ of a + landscape plan. (NOTE; [Tsually associated wa.th PUD' s) 3. I have checked the landsca~e plan against the road andl stcarm drainage design and there are the following canf licts ; J I 4!f'pI e It"al ~{/Y~ ~ ` ~v . . ~ ~ • ~ ~ 410 ~ . ~ 4. The following road plans have abearing on the ciesign af roads fox this project an~ a cc~~y is in the file; ~ ~ 5. 1 have sent an "R" value and percolation test request to the Construction Section with sails information and a layout of the proj ect. "Ri, value text request to eng ineers (date) . ?n~A# M4 _ 3 6. Are existing utilities shown on the plans?Kk&- 7. Are proposed utilities shown on the plans? ft~' 8. Does the note "Any conflicting utilities shall be relocated prior to construction." appear on the plans? ~ 9. Are curb design sheets provided for existing streets? ~ 10. Does the curb design conform to Spokane County Standards of section cross slope (Between 2% and 4.5$)? ~ 11. Is there a street cross section shown for widening existing streets? 12. Does the proposed vertical and horizontal alignment meet Spokane County Standards? 13. Do the plans show the typical cross section for streets? l 14. Do the street widths match the Findings and Order~ la"~ C016, .f 15. Does the typical section on the plans meet Spokane County Road Standards? 16. Is the cross slope shown, is it within our I standards, and is it correct'71,¢ffj ~ 17. Is the type of curb shown? ~ 18. Is the type of curb shown the proper type of curb for the road classification? 19. Does the curb shown meet Spokane County Road Standards for curbs within the public right-of- way? ~ 20. Is the curb type consistent with the curb in the general area? ~ 21. Has an "R" value test been performed for each soil group?`/~ /0"- 22. Do the vertical curves meet or exceed th required length for stopping sight distance?p " P~t r1'~ 1 23. Are the low points of the vertical curves at locations where water is designed to flow through an inlet or curb cut? 4 i 24. Are stop signs shown for all streets which intersect arterial? (Check with County Traffic Engineer if there is a question) 25. Has the intersection sight distance analysis been provided for all intersections with arterial or higher classification streets? 26. Are street name signs shown at all intersecting streets? ~tv" ~ 27. Is there a need for barriers at the end of dead end streets? ~ 28. Is there a need for other special signing? {Check with the County Traff ic Engineer) 29. Is the bench mark shown on the plans? 30. Has the Fire District approved the proposed private road turnarounds that are substandard according to our Spokane County Road Standards? 31. Are BCR, MCR, and ECR elevations shown on all curb returns? 32. Are cul-de-sac grades shown for the top of curb? 33. Are curb returns shown in the profile? 34. Are the curb return elevations correct? 35. Do the cul-de-sac qrades meet county cul-de-sac standards? 36. Do the intersections meet the 2$ qrade requirements? 37. Does the curb return radius meet the county standard o f 20 f eet? 38. Transitions from end of curb to existing paving shown? 39. Is there a need for slope easements? 40. Is there a need for erosion protection? 41. Are the curb grades below the county minimum of 0.8%? 42. If curb grades are below 0.8%, has a special note ' been added which requires a licensed land ~ surveyor to verify that the curb forms are at the i correct plan grade prior to construction? 5 FIELD REVIEW l. Field investigation trip made on 2. Report completed and put into file on 3. Are there any existing utilities on the project site? If yes, describe. 4. Are the drainage basins on the ground the same as those that are presented in the drainage report? 5. Are there any drainage channels directed toward property? 6. Are there any drainage channels directing water through the property? 7. County roads cut off drainage as per drainaqe calculations? 8. If culverts under county roads, does the flow go away from or toward the project? 9. What kind of ground cover exists? 10. Describe any existing channel conditions: 11. Describe channel cross section: 12. Existing Curb Type: 6 DRAINAGE AND PLAN REVIEW CHECRLIST ~ ~ 1. Has a plat map been submitted which shows lot dimensions, street widths, etc.? 2. Was a contour map submitted or a maP with ~ ~ adequate spot elevations on it to properly determine drainage basins? ~ 3. Was a "best available" contour map submitted?~lN Aftf 4. Were all existing drainage courses shown? ~ 5. Were all the proposed drainage courses shown? 6. Were Hydrologic calculations submitted for each basin? 1 7. Were culvert calculations submitted? 8. Are percolation tests required for soils in this area? 9. Were grate calculations submitted? 10. Does the drainage report identify the SCS soil groups for the project area and for the proposed roads to be built in the project area? 11. Are ditch capacity calculations submitted for all ditches that are proposed to be used in the drainage plan? 12. For 208 design concepts, were swale floor sizing calculations made? 13. For 208 design concepts, were swale volume calculations made? 14. If a detention concept is being used, were calculations submitted? ~ 15. The drainage design does not propose to divert water from a natural watercourse. ~ 16. The drainage design does not concentrate water flow where sheet flow previously existed. 17. No part of the plat lies within a designated 100- year Flood Plain Area. 18. The drainage concept is compatible with planning commission requirements. ~ 19. The 50 year frequency was used for off -site areas. ~ 20. The dif ference between present and future f lows i s reta ined on the s ite ~ 7 INLETS ~ 1. The inlets shown are within the stream flow. ~ 2. Curb type inlets are shwwn at sags and are properly sized. Perimeter is divided by 2 for calculations where no curb ;PAfiP9e?4We-1vided. ~ 3. There are no long curves with f lat grades which pose a problem. 4. The centerline road stations for all inlets are shown on the plans. 5. Grate type is shown on the plan and is acceptable. (Spokane County Standard inlets in county ROW, on private property other inlet type may be specif ied) ~ 6. A detail drawing of the grate/curb installation is shown on the plans and includes the 211 depression and transitions as per county standards for grates that are located within county ROW. ~ 7. A curb cut detail is shown on the plans with the new county back drop with transitions and a 2" depression for curb cuts inside county ROW. 8. The plans shows acceptable curb cut details and grate details for installations which lie within private road easements. ~ 9. If inlets are in a gravel road or a dirt ditch a 6'x 6' A.C. apron is shown around the inlet. ~ 10. There are no inlets shown on the high side of a road where they will do little or no good. ~ 11. Catch basin or special manhole details are shown or a standard drawing is specif ied. ~ 12. Critical low points in the drainage system have been provided with overflow easements. 208 SWALE SYSTEMS 1. The swale bottom and sides have sod or grass turf specif ied. 2. Swale side slopes do not exceed a 3:1 side slope. (A 2:1 side slope allowed if swale depth is less than 12" deep. Should only be allowed where constrained by obstacles) 8 3. If depth of water from bottom to drywell rim is between 6 and 8 inches, soil mixture has been specified which meets Spokane County Guidelines. 4. Drywell is located within 8 feet of the curb line. 5. Soil type is appropriate for drywells. 6. Drywell location does not conflict with underground utilities. 7. Drywell type is specified. 8. Drywell grate type is specified. 9. Bottom elevation is specified and is correct. 10. Bottom dimensions are shown and the arsa matches the required area from the 208 calculation for impervious areas. 11. Easements for the 208 are shown on the drainage plans and on the subdivision plat and are of adequate size to contain the 208 swale and are tied to the lot corners. 12. The side of the swale that is the furthest distance from the street should have a top of swale elevation that is higher than the highest water level of the swale. 13. If filter fabric is specified for the drywell its installation specification is adequate. 14. If 208 lot plans are required they were submitted on . 15. The 208 lot plans, dimensioned to lot corners, have shown - drainage easements, - setback requirements, - bottom of swale elevation, - rim elevation if drywell are present, - curb cut lengths, - any drainage ditches, - an attached cross section of the swale or ditch, - has left the lot area clear of writing, - shows grass sod, - shows depth from the top of the curb, - has been stamped by a professional engineer on all paqes, - and is of sufficient scale to maximize the lot size to the 8 1/2" x 11" paper size. (Drawings may be on plain white paper) 16. The 208 lot plans show the lot number, block number, subdivision name, date drawn, and scale. 9 17. The swale is not located inside a future set aside area. See Findings and Order for where setasides are required. 18. 208 lot plans were approved on CIILVERT3 AND PIPE SY3TEMS 1. The road culverts are at the low points of stream f low . 2. The headwater was calculated for culvert entrances and is under 2 diameters for culverts under 18" in diameter and 1.5 diameters for culverts greater than 18". 3. There is a minimum of 12 of cover for all culverts and storm sewer pipes. 4. The minimum velocity within the pipe system is 4 feet per second at design f low. (Note: The County Engineer may permit lower velocities) 5. The backwater calculations show a minimum freeboard of 0.75 feet for each catch basin or manhole. 6. The minimum culvert and pipe slope is 0.5% and all pipes meet or exceed this standard. 7. Al1 angle points in the storm sewer system have suitable access such as a manhole for cleaning. 8. At locations where two different pipe sizes inter the same manhole the 0.8 diameter points of each pipe are at the same elevation. (Note: Exception allowed for drop manholes) 9. There is no downsizing of pipes in a systems of pipes that are 18" in diameter and smaller. 10. There is a downsizing of pipes in the amount of 3" for a minimum of 100 feet in a pipe system that contains pipes that are 18" and larger in size. 11. All pipes in the pipe system are 12" and larger as per Spokane County Standards except for 10" pipe that is allowed for connection of inlets to catch basins or drywells. 12. All storm sewer pipes are located a minimum of 5 feet from a rear or side property line and have adequate easements for maintenance. 10 13. The maximum distances between inlets on the same slope should not exceed approximately 500 feet. 14. The plans show all culvert pipe types and they meet county standards for systems that lie within county ROW. (Note: The type of pipe in private systems may be a specif ied by the design engineer) 15. The plans show all culvert invert elevations and lengths. 16. The culverts shown are properly stationed from centerline stationing. 17. There are no conflicts with underground utilities. 18. There is no need for energy dissipation on any of the culverts outlets shown on the plans. 19. There is no need for rip rap around the culvert outlet for some or all of the culverts as proposed on the drainage plans. 20. The rip rap that is shown for the drainage plans is adequate for the culverts where erosion is a concern and the engineer has submitted acceptable rip rap design calculations. 21. Adequate drainage easements are shown for maintenance of drainage ditches or pipe systems. 22. Culverts are shown on the road plan and profile sheets. 23. Pipe anchors are shown for pipe grades greater than 15%. 24. There are no instances where water is trapped against a f ill with no culvert shown. 25. Profiles and cross sections are shown on the plans for all proposed channels and ditches. 26. Ditches with eroding velocities have a proper lining for erosion protection. 27. There are easements proposed or existing for natural channels which cross the property. 28. Water will properly f low from an existinq or proposed ditch on to the pavement as proposed on the drainage plans. 29. Where the ditch profile passes from cut to fill the flow has been properly disposed of. 11 1 ' 30. An easement was provided where street drainage was diverted onto private property. 31. The perpetual maintenance of private systems has properly been provided for. 32. The maintenance of drainage systems within Spokane County ROW has been properly provided for. 33. Appropriate drainage language has been provided by the reviewing engineer to the surveyor and/or engineer who is involved with the plat-ting work. k\W\f\newcbcc 12 , • . I ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER _ A. INTRODUCTION Tiii s matter havi ng come before the Zoni ng Heari ng Exami ner Comni ttee on J uly 3, 1985, and the members of the Committee present being Ron Odell,, Chai rman, Kathl een M. Carstens and J erry Wi 11 i ans. ~ B. PROPOSAL The.sponsor, Richard Mason, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZF-52-85, Multiple Family Suburban to Residential Manufactured Home, for the purpose of developing a 33-Unit Manufactured Home Park. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, including manufactured home subdivisions; commercial, sewer trunk line and undeveloped open area. • - 2.. That the Comprehensi ve P1 an desi gnates thi s area as appropri ate for Suburban development. 3. That the exi sti ng zoni ng of the property desc ri bed i n the appl i cati on is Multiple Family Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy k I~~► www.w~1..J I.1. L ~ ~ /~•.~..rlL.L~~ . . t:,L ' ~ ~3~'c u~ccfi ~v~uN Icu wI .S ~11, aiiu ~iit ~~uou I ~ ~cC ioi~LUi's ri ~ ~~t ~fiE Determination of Non-Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been ful fi 11 ed. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substanti al ly changed si nce the ori gi nal zoni ng of thi s area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is Justified. ; . • ~ . . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 8. That the proposed use can be made compatible with existing uses in the area. ` 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed approval with reservati ons of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be tn harmony -wi th the general purpose and wi 11 not •be otherwi se detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. D. CONDITIONS OR CORTINGEh!CIES APPLIED TO TNIS APPROVAL (A11 Condi ti ons i mposed . by the Zoni ng Heari ng Exami ner Comni ttee shal 1 be bi ndi ng on the "Appl i cant" , whi ch term shal 1 i ncl ude the owner or owners of the property, hei rs, assi gns, and successors. ) 1. That Planning Depa rtment Condition #10 be deleted and replaced as follows: "That fencing indicated on the site plan along the north and south property 1 i nes be i nstal l ed and be of a resi denti al natu re such as wood." 3. That a minimum 6-foot tall dense landscape screen be provided along Flora Road and Steen Road. The specific intent is to completely _ screen the back yards -of the stal l s from ad,joi ni ng vi ews. a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The Zoni ng Admi ni strator shal 1 approve a spec i f i c` exteri or - . 1 i ghti ng pl an for the approved area pri or to i nstal 1 ati on of such liahting. (Such plan shall attemot to confine illumination to the area wi th ful 1 consi derati on to adj acent properti es) . - 2~ A speci fic 1 andscape pl an, pl anti ng schedul e and provi si ons for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a perf ormance bond for the project pri or to rel ease of bui 1 di ng permi ts. Landscapi ng shal 1 be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access poi nts i s not obscured or impai red. , 2 ~ " . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance wi thi n the concept presented to the Heari ng Exami ner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All va riations must conf orm to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordi•nance, The ori gi nal i ntent of the -devel opment pl ans shal 1 be maintained. 4. That prior to release of building permits, the sponsor shall submi t a fi nal Manufactured ;;ome Park design p 'lan to the Planning Department which demonstrates compliance with the Residential Manufactured Home Zone, Development Standards of Section 4.05A.050-(b-1-9), and all Hearing Examiner Committee conditions of approval. 5. Al1 current standards of the Residential Manufactured Home Zone, • as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this si te. 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provi de necessary 1 andscapi ng for runoff. 7. Any di vi si on of 1 and for the purpose of sal e, 1 ease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting Ordi nances pri or to i ssuance of bui 1 di ng permi ts. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) day s of final disposition of this appl icati on, and pri or to any on-si te improvements. 9. That landscaping as indicated on the submitted site plan be installed and maintained. 10. That fencing indicated on the site plan be installed and be of a residential nature such as wood or slatted chain link, 11. That 8 to 10-foot tall trees be installed around the entire perimeter at a spaci ng of approximately 50-feet on center. 12. That the recreational vehicle storage area be screened from view of adjacent properties and stal l s wi thi n the park. 13. That use of the recreational vehicle storage area is for tenants : of the Manufactured Home Park only. F ll r ^ 3 ~ ` ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Prior To The Issuance Of A Buildinq Permit: . Appl icant shal l dedicate 5 feet on Steen Road for right-of-way pri or to any use of the property. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 3. Direct access tothe abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Rai 1 road ri ght of way from the proposal i s prohi bi ted. 4. Applicant shall improve Steen Road in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway secti on No. 2 mi nimum pavi ng width Access Standard. 5. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engi neer road, drai nage, and access pl ans pri or to the i ssuance of a building permit on the property. ~ The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Nealth District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal pl an for the entire project pri or to the i ssuance of any building permit on the property. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engi neer pri or to the issuance of a building permit on the property. T he design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfaci ng as approved by the County Engi neer, wil l be requi red for any porti on of the proj ect whi ch i s to be occupi ed or traveled by vehicles. 8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, hi s hei rs, assi gns, and successors. 9. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, wi th the approval of the County Engi neer, j oi n i n and be a willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 10. As an alternative metfiod of constructing the road improvement stated herei n, the appl icant may, wi th the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County , will not participate in the cost of these improvements. r r ~ . 4 s • . , , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 11. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 12. Al1 required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washi ngton Standard Speci ficati ons for Road and Bri dge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management i n effect at the date of constructi-on, unl ess otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 13. Roadway standards, typical roadway secti ons and drai nage pl an requi rements are found i n Spokane Board of County Commi ssi oners' Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. ' c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to pl ace thei r name(s) on a peti ti on for the formati on of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the peti ti on i ncl udes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) f rom objection to any assessment(s) on the property_ as a result of _ improvements cal 1 ed for i n conj uncti on wi th the formati on of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for thi s project shal l be provided i n acco rdance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Public sewers are to be provided and connection made to the Valley interceptor. Sewer design to be approved by the County Utilities Director. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Neal th Di stri ct pri or to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permit for this project. 2. Sewage di sposal method shal l be as authori zed by the Di rector of Utilitie s, Spokane County. 5 e • ~ y ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (conti nued) 3. A publ ic sewer system wi 11 be made avai 1 abl e for the project. Use of individual on-site sewage systems shall not be authorized. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilitie s, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when ~ approved-• by the Regi onal Engi neer ( Spokane) ~*State Department of Social and Health Services. 6. Use of private wells and water sy stems is prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The si te i s 1 ocated i n Fi re Di strict # 1. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 3. Trash enclosures shall not be located adj acent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. 4. Bui 1 di ng permi ts wi 11 berequi red for each structure. 5. Where it is desired to have access control gates in residential developments, the following shall apply:The minimum width of roadway, inside of access gate, shall be twelve (12) feet. There shall be at least two (2) such drive approaches where the gates are located. One may be used for vehicles exiting. Tire flatting spikes shall not be used unless the entrance is a minimum of twenty (20) fQet wide. The gates shall be provided with an approved method of emergency operation in accordance wi th the fi re department standards. Where each drive approach is less than twenty (20) feet.in width and controlled by gates, a secondary means of access shall be provided with a clear, twenty (20) foot unobstruc ted opening. 6. Fi re fl ow hydrant requi rements for thi s pl at are 500 gal l ons per mi nute for 30 mi nutes. Hydrants are to be spaced no further than 900 feet and such that structures fall within a 450 foot radius of said hydrants. Plat sponsor to verify specific hydrant requi rements wi th Fi re Di strict # 1. The pl at dedication shall state: "required hy drants shall be installed pri or to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permi ts or sal e of any . 1 ots". . M ; , ~ - ' 6 . . . , • ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor is Consolidated Irrigation District, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and i rri gati on uses. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demol i ti on, excavati on and constructi on proj ects be..control l ed. Thi s may requi re use of water sprays, tarps, spri nkl ers, or suspensi on of acti vi ty duri ng certai n weather condi ti ons. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities. 2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or . spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. It has been determined that fireplaces and wood stoves are a significant source of suspended particulates. The small particles (C lOmicrons) are respirable and can have an adverse effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if wood stoves/fireplaces are used, that burning be done as efficiently as possible. All wood should be seasoned and stored in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated air pollution levels, we request that use of wood stoves and fireplaces be discontinued. 5. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using the site following completion of the project and from occupants of the proposed project. 6. Al1 air pollution regulations must be met. . 7 ~ •G' Y r ' rZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 E. ORDER The Nearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Richard Mason, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVED to the RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME ZONE. Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Williams Vote: Carstens - Aye Williams - Aye Odell - Aye Unanimous to APPROVE the Rezone per Specific Conditions to RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME ZONE 3- 0) Motion by: Odell Vote: Odell - Aye Carstens - Nay Williams - Nay To restrict direct stall access to Flora Road and Steen Road - (1 - 2; Motion Failed) -HEARING E XAMINER COMMITTEE HER&B* TO THE ABOVE F INGS, ORD R, AND VOTE ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD P1 an i ng Di recto STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator Date: ~ /q~s BOWSTRING METHOD (TEN YEAR STORM DESIGN) PROJECT: ze5285 TIME OF CONCENTRATION (minutes) DETENTION BASIN DESIGN BASIN: A REVIEWER: Parry Tc (ovedand) Tc (gutter) Aress 'C' A*C NUMBER OF DRYWELLS PROPOSED DATE: 22-Apr-93 2 Single (type A) 0 Double (type B) Ct = 0.15 l2 = 0 3.98 0.60 2,388 Total Area (cafc.) (see Ht) 3,98 Z1 = 4 0.00 0,00 0 Time of Conc, (calc.) (see H1) 5,00 L1(A) = 0 Z2 = 41 0.00 0,00 0 Composite'C' (calc,) (see 1-11) 0,60 N(A) = 0,4 B= 0 0.00 0,00 0 Time of Conc, (min) 5.00 S(A) = 0,005 n= 0.016 0.00 0.00 0 Area (Acxes) 3.98 s= 0.008 0.00 0.00 0 C' Factor 0.60 Tc (A) = 0,00 d= 0.1345 0.00 0.00 0 Impervious Area (sq, ft,) 29312 Total A Comp "C' Volume Provided 2495 L1(B) = 0 Tc (gu) = 0.00 3.98 0.60 Out9ow (cfs) 0,6 N(B) = 0 Tc(A+B) = 0.00 Area * C° Factor 2.39 S(B) = 0 Q=C"i*A= 7.59 Tc(tot.) = 5.00 Q(est.) = 0.00 #1 #2 #3 #4 #5 #6 #7 Tc (B) = 0.0 Intensity = 3.18 Time Time Intensity Q dev. V in V out Stae88 A= 0.407031 Inc. Inc. WP = 6.4701 (min,) (sec.) (in./hr.) (cfs) (cu. ft.) (cu, ft.) (cu. ft.) R = 0,0670 (#1*60) (A*C*#3) (Outf.*#2) (#5-#6) V = 1,37 Tc (total) = Tc (ovedano + Tc (gutter) Tc(gu) = 0,00 5.00 300,00 3.18 7.59 3053 180,00 2873 Tc (ovedandQ = Ct'(L1*NIS^0.5) ^0.6) Q(est) = 0,56 Ct = 0,15 5 300 3.18 7.59 3053 180 2873 L1 = Length of Overland Flow Holding = 0,00 10 600 2.24 5.35 3755 360 3395 N= fiction facta of overland flow (.4 fa average gass cover) 15 900 1.77 423 4235 540 3695 S= average slope of overland flow 20 1200 1.45 3.46 4508 720 3788 Tc (gutter) = Length (R,)IVelocity (ft,lsec,)160 25 1500 1.21 2.89 4629 900 3729 B= Bottom width of gutter or ditch 30 1800 1.04 2.48 4724 1080 3644 Z1 = inverse of cross slope one of ditch 35 2100 0.91 2.17 4785 1260 3525 Z2 = inverse of cross slope two of ditch 40 2400 0.82 1.96 4899 1440 3459 d= depth of flow in guter (estimate, check estimate with Flow) 45 2700 0.74 1.77 4951 1620 3331 Area = d'B+d ^2/2*(Z1 +Z2) 50 3000 0.68 1.62 5037 1800 3237 Wetted perimeter = B;d+(1Jsin(afi(1/Z1))+1/sin(atn(1/Z2))) 55 3300 0.64 1.53 5199 1980 3219 Hydraulic Radius = R= ArealWetted Perimeter 60 3600 0.61 1.46 5393 2160 3233 Velocity = 1.486Jn"R ^.667*s ^.5 65 3900 0.60 1.43 5734 2340 3394 Flow = Velocity'Area 70 4200 0.58 1.39 5956 2520 3438 n= 0,016 for asphalt 75 4500 0.56 1.34 6154 2700 3454 s= longitucinal slope of guQer 80 4800 0.53 127 6204 2880 3324 85 5100 0.52 1.24 6460 3060 3400 90 5400 0.50 1.19 6569 3240 3329 95 5700 0.49 1.17 6789 3420 3369 100 6000 0.48 1.15 6994 3600 3394 DRAINAGE POND CALCULATIONS Requited grassy swale pond storage volume = Impervious Area x,5 in.l 12 inJft, = 1221 cu, ft. Grassy swale pond volume provided = 2495 cu. ft. ORYWELL REQUIREMENTS - 10 YEAR DESIGN STORM Maximum storage required by Bowstring = 3788 cu, ft. , V~✓ i G ► r ,`i~ l~~`l~.l ~Y ~ ~ ~ • , , • ~ ~ . ~ , , ,..7 l~~ C.~r ~ L'~~'9,~L' J ~ ! f ~ f ~ Zc ~t► ~ ~ l 7`d ~ - : . ~ ~ ~O • 44 " ; • ` qr ~'t c ? ' f `r ~ r " 1 ~t.Ctt '7 ` 4y` •'4't ` ~4 ~ Av+,. ~ . , 3fT ! 0• ~~~.l~' ~.'~r~ ~f • . . w ; ~ rrvj ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~f ' `3'~~ ~f'1~~~ . ► . ~ ~ f ~ ~ rj' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ r~~ • Gl~' j~ G~--~ 7`--.:. ,~~i. - ~ / i l~ ~ ;,L~ / ~.,'T • - - ~ • << ~f.;~ . rt x. ; - . A-4, ' I c~.;{~r ~r~`~.C Gy~,,,,~ ~~~t'~'•i ~ , _ f • " ~ ~ ~ : .i ~ • , f- • f ~-~,f • c~- 5 , ` L' ~1 ,►l, L~"'l ~t-~~^ • ~ f~ I ~ i . ~ ~4 T Pfte , i ~ I ~ L~ ~ r Y G~ - ~ • - e,,.f~ ~44 r ; ~J61 t 4t ' Cr~, ; &ZA ~ r '.I t J•~ ~ ~r~l ' ``s ► t ~'~C~ ' ~ / . ~r I ;t v - , ~j - Z44 2 yt„~~ ~ ~r L~ • ~ -~-1 ~ Z~! ~ (7, ; . ~ • ' r -71 r ~ C ~3z3t - i{ i ! 4 ' . _ . . . 4•~ - r , o(- 1) -vt,lI`~ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ~ 1'~S OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ► t , RONALD C. HORMANN, P.E. V.COUNTY ENGINEER ~1£ . . SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0170 SPOnAHC COUMIr CouRT HOUS[ PR = OR 2 TY FEE AGREEMENT Agzeement Number Z E. 46 7. 8f) . ~ This agreemtnt between Spokane County and whose interest in the project is , s entered into this 4/ day of 19.~.~ . This agreement is applica le to th pro'ect nown s: _ That the individuals and parties named herein as having an interest in the above described property or project agree to the following: 1. They request that priority review be given to their project. 2. They agree to reimburse Spokane County for project review fees as specified in Board of County Commissioner's Resolution 80- 159•2 attachment C, as amended. The fees will be based on overtime costs incuxred by Spokane County for project reviews ' plus a ten percent administrative charge, and will be billed • , monthly as accrued. 3. The undersigned agrees that these fees are due and payable upon receipt of the billing as specified above. The monthly billing, should be sent to the attention of : REC"' i . , ~FEB 1 1 1993 .S' . . I understand-that failure to pay these fees may result in delay in completio.n or approval ot the project or other possible . sanctions. By Public Works Building / North 811 Jefferson Street / Spokane, Washington 99260-0170 (509) 456-360() RECFIVED'. ~ k FE6 2 3 1993 : ft . . . .g~Ke1E cui!~~ ~ t 1% sN ic"t ~ S P O K A N E . C O U N • ~x"-` ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering, Bill Hemmings Spokane County Utilities, Jim Legat . Spokane County Health District, Daryl Way Spokane County Division of Buildings, Jeff Forry . Fire Protection District No. 1 Consolidated Irrigation District #19, Robert Ashcraft FROM: StacY BJ'ordahl, Planner I~ DATE: February 23, 1993 RE: Revised Meadowbrook Village Manufactured Home Park (ZE-52-85) Richard Mason, sponsor for the above mentioned project, recently distributed revised site plans for your review. The revised site plans illustrate an increase in densiry from thirty- ` one (31) spaces to thirty-two (32) with the addition of space 15A. In order to expedite the completion of this project, I would appreciate your written comments on the revision as soon as possible. T'hank you for your prompt attention. Lf vnu have any questior.s, please centact me at 456-2245. c: Richard Mason, E-. 15918 Cameron Ct. Veradale, WA 99037 WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE ' SPOKANE, WASxtNTGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205 INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO., INCII South 25 Altamont Street Spokane. Washington 99202 (509) 535-1,l February 10, 1993 IV Spokane County Engineers 1~1993 N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 ~'`~~p~~ i ATTN: Bill Hemmings RE: Meadowbrook Village Mobile Home Park ZE-52-85 Dear Bill: I am transmitting for your review and approval, one set of revised plans for Meadowbrook Village Mobile Home Park which reflects the addition of Lot 15A to make a total of 32 rental spaces plus a possible future manager's space. The original zoning approval allowed 33 rental spaces. (Findings and Order attached for your information.) Also attached is a set of the currently approved plans for your information. Phase I as marked on both sets of plans has been constructed and is occupied. The addition of Lot 15A at the south end of Blueberry Place requires the relocation of proposed 1208' facilities to the park storage area designated Lot 20A. Drainage from Blueberry Place is intercepted in a catch basin and piped to Lot 20A. All other drainage facilities have been previously approved and are constructed. Calculations are being submitted to verify the adequacy of the new '208' facilities and the new piping. I am most anxious to meet with you when you are ready to review these plans so that I might more thoroughly explain the proposed changes. Very truly yours, ~ . Richard L. Mason Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Environmentol Analysis . , `W"MPWP--, 4w" . . . 8905120188 ZE-52-85 , i N 0 5 W*ZNAME-Arvo. Sc4tQh N0 T t C E T 0 lf N E P U BL IC ~:.PMML No. 2q.~y~_ ~0 3*5~AGE rvRPOSE Z~E-5'Z 8S , K.NOIJ ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That Rir-harti T,- friB.son and Ii$,ncy K. Mason ~hi~~.shan.d - i~lf~ a-nd Dan Zd. ~,mbert (a sin-le man) beirig the awners of the fulluwing described lands i.n consideration oL- mut«al berieli.ts to be hereafter derived dn for themselves, their heirs, grantees and assigns, hereby agree to the foilowing: 1'o atatt►arize the County to place Chei.r name (s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petiCion method pursuant ro RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the owners property and further not to object by the ~ sigiiing of a protest petition against the f.ormation of a ULID by reso].ution method pursuaRr ta RCW Chapter 36.94, whir-h i:ncl.uries the owner(s) proper.ty. PKUV(.DCD, this condition shall noC prohibit the ' owraer(s) or successor(s) from objection to any assessmer.r(:;) on the rroperty as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the format:ion oF a ULTD by eittier petitl.on or resolutiori method urider RCW Chapter 36.94. This statement involves the following described property: That portion of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter (NEj-) of the Yortheast Quarter (NF14`) of Section 249 Toi•mship 25 North, Range 44 E.1rr.M.~ in apok.a.ne County~ 1fashington, lying South of the Chicago, R'Iilwaukee and St. laul Railroad right of ;•ray; EXCEPT the 5outh 422 feet thereof; APTD ALSO 'LL'~r CEPT 5teen Road; AND AI.:SO EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within Fl oi•a Road. , - 4 ' '',,~~?~f~ a , tt r . , , .~'r y rJb• _ _w MAY Z I 34 Fr°1 '8S G N... - • . . . • Cr_11h {iv~' ''~i•'~ c.., ` ^r, . . . ' • ~tC )C . , These requirements are and shall run witll the land and shall be binding upon the owcigrs, their heirs, successors or assi.gns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, have hereunto set ~,~tiand(s nd seal.(s) this day o f , , -19~3- ~ . . f , S'I'ATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUN'£Y OF SPOKANE ) ss On this day personally appeared before me L~ persorial.ly known to iire to be the indivi.dua.l(s) whv e:ce;_uted the jnra()-i.ne lnrt'rvmt,nr and acknawiedged tiic: said :i.n,r_rument ra be the f recc and vraluiitary act a«d dcecl oF said individual(s), tor the use:y and purposes there:iii ment:iuned. Given und,er.,-iu.y,,,hanci and seal this day of. 19 Vf )nA fw.~. ~ ` w..S.~~! Notar.y Yublic In and For the State of Wasttington, • j; „ J~ ~_1~~-~+ - residing in S~al C'L vR - ; ' z~ ~ . re,;p...;•S,~(, , ' 1 ~ o~. 1035,pAuI201 . d STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE > ss . On tF115 day,personally appeared before me V--~~`-- ---------~-'i,~^~:--~'--~---1~--- - I- person,allyn~~jt•g~~n; to me to be the individual (s) who executed the Forgoir+g ir~str-urr~ent ard ~~citt~~'l~dj~&~he said instrument to be the Free and voluntary act and deed oi said in,dA~ual~(s}:, for the uses and purposes thereir~ mentioned. C).' ~ -t t,~ , 1 k~ ` i 1 Given t~n~Fr ,`h.nd and seal this day of ___1 1_ \c•.. 19_~~____. , ' • ~ r' ( ~ \ a.~~~"_~ r ~ . Notary Fublic ~ In and ior the State of Washing#.on, rACidinn af SnnL.ano. W.~chinntnn ~ , . . - . • - ' ~ ~ 8905120189 f ZE-52_85 i • Steen Rd. #1890 N O 6 ~Q NAw • W. _ L - ?a N 0 T I C ET0 T H E'P U B L 1 C . j PAr2c*fi.. Na. 2 ' C~PAl3E~. 2 0 2 ' V O L. ~ O~~!.J KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That Richard L. Mason and Nancy K. Ilason(husbax:d& wife) .A1-JD Da,n W. I,ambert (a sinal e man ) being the owners of the following described lands in consideration of mutual benefits to be hereafter derived do for themselves, their heirs, grantees and assigns', hereby agree to the following: Th,e' owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement nistrict (RID) by the petition method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which petition includes the owner(s) propertv, and further not to obiect, by the signing of a ballot, the formation of a RID by the resolution method pursuant to Chapter 36.88 RCW, which resolution inc'_udes- *_ha cwr.e: (s) proFer*}►. ii aRID is formed by either the petition or resolution method, as provided for in Chapter 36.88 RCW, the owner(s) or successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the ' proposed RID is feasible, (2) that the benefits to be derived from the fo'rmation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is- sufficiently developed. Provided, further, the owner(s) or successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to , object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the irnprovements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by* either petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW. It- is further agreed that at such time as an RID is created or any Road , Improvement Project is sanctioned by Spokane County, the improvements required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing ,pa•v~ement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their hei'rs, grantees and assigns. Itie conditions and statements apply to the following described property: That portion of the East Half (E of the Northeast Quarter (NE4 ) of the PTortheast Quarter (NE-;'~-) of Section 24, Township 25 Tlorth, Range 44, E. YT.Mo , in Spokane County, ii•lashington, lying South of the Chicage, Milwaukee and St Paul - Railroad right of ti•ray; EXCEPT the South 422 feet thereof; AN~'J EXCEPT Steen Road, AND A.T.SO EXCEPT any portion thereof lying within Flora P►oad. { ' . VT ~1~~~vK'~ ~ a~ •«4A I1 I . ' • _ j-yIJ r~ , • 4At11 i ~ 35 PH '85 ,t-.: . - . , . ~1~~j5~,~ •~y~ These requirements are and shall run with the land and sha11 be binding upan the owners, their heirs, successors or assigns. IN WITNrU~S WHEREOF, &I-e have hereunto set OC!/L hand(s) and seal(s) this day o f I ~ , , V t STATE OF WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ss YOL. 10 3 5 ~~GE 12 O 3 On this day personally appeared before me ~~~,,.i•,~,•~•t I.. c~s~~, r` ^ / \ ~ C,. L... ti~. l`--"\ C.. s u r. personally ' known tc me to be the indiN~idual(.<:) wha erecurPei rhP f~~-~.-,r:- y~~~.-.•m~T* - _ ~ «fta acicnowieaged tne sald instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of sa;id individual(s), for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Givcri u rider my hand anci seal this r, day of 19 ~ { , r. , • ~ ~ ~ . . w - • V • N'otary Public a In and for the State of Washington, residing in /)UCL C • ~ r e 1 r . . • . , r , . STATE OF W'• ,rI1NiTON ) COUNTY UF _`.';AtdE ) ss 1 On this day persc,nally appeared before me n~____l~-____~~,,n~~~s~ persorLally , known to me to be the individual (s) who executed the fargoing instrurr~er~t and ac~i~,nn~;lkdgzd the said instrument to be the iree and voluntary act and deed of 'sa,id:;itr~-; d'ika1',~s' , f or the uses and purposes therein ment ioned. J (J Gi,ve'~ e,r m')!:hand and seal this day of c, . ' ' • ` ~ y; c; ' _ ~ ~ ~.f~~`- - - - - - - •~~-,~t~~`' ,.~Notary Publ ic ~j . • In and for the State oF Washington, . residing at Spokane, WasFiington. ~ '9O _ " . HIG~''~'j~Y . , . c ER-S~ v 8 4 ,e, _ r- woo~ . 1 • I ~ `M~ i ~ ~ • ~ N►"`J ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OFFI ~ A . i 'I ~ ' ; . ..R-• ~ t~ ~ / 'r 0` ~ S''tl'► ~ ~ . . ►N . M ~ . . , 01 00 1 - , Q . Q Z . ~y v . ~ ~ 1 ~ _ ~ p J i + Y' J ~ ~ ~ ~ i z R A,~,r-- . f ! .L~ ~ o ~ ~ E V E~. - . ~ 2 r~ ~yw ~ P ~ f, . R • f''a' . ' aT = ~ , ( ~~-~.~-y- O ~bi`. ~ , ~ RD. • - - ~ . ' W 4'rH ~ • y- . ' GE 8q;% 0 ► , 1 N W g 0 9 f - F, A IL . 4 1 ~ l. AK E ' ~ /'t~ ze15D P~ , , ~ Alb- WM , au AVE• Z Q . g ~ 0%x% • • 'a . •~:~O~Q _ • , J6. a ~ ~ h • • C ! . . v{~ ~rQ„rp~r ~ / ~r ' ~ ~ h zd~SC,~~vG Y, /XAStO ogpPER7'y 14 , • ~A~ oLOU ~t 5~ y i ~ i 1 10 ~ I; , 0 Aj ~ ~ ~ p5 W w~ ~ ~ ~ 100 ~ _1 ~ ' ~n D,p~1ec 43 I ~ r q,,00 ~ 00,16LIWIDL ~ 15, • ra•tD J AS 47 MEApo~BR~ as ~Z ts S' /o , a c I im 4 I ~ qx,e~t~ Z ~5 f N~6N~~4r,e ( i 3~✓ JS s£u[[ oN FLD,QA.rO (a 45 30 ~~ro GS 'G ~q, ~t CO I I H ♦ ~,l h , f 30 ,fe I 13 /00 4t"0 h kE C~ A Q~4T~0~~ rOD vC~~A~f q~ { tQ ~ ~ I ? p ` 1. q5 Q D y ~ , ~ V • 'oo ~ ~ • ~ ' 1 )!1 lliLW C~`N /UK FfNCE Ou 3°fAGE oAo A6 ' 3 I , jds ~ Pt/A~f ! P1NASt ; j , - , I . . . ' S t~ . ~,'.i::~' i ' ;i1':::~ ~ - •'.•.~ti~t_'"'_' ' j k :t4~,, . .~:"tf . II~ ~ 7 1 + ~ ~ , , .•,~p~ . •t - ;-:K -.'s:.': - i i ~ :f~: . I' i ~ - . 'r , . ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' f IBROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET a ~1 , PHONE 456-2205 •►•\9i1J1~_• ~ , ~ 'r SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 . . • . .t.i:: . ' SPOKANE COUnT'! COURT MOUSC P L A N N I N G REPORT Date: JULY 3, 1985 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: Spokane County Planning Department SUBJ ECT: Rezone #ZE-52-85; Multiple Family Suburban to Residential Manufactured Home I. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: RICHARD MASON Owner: Dan W. Lambert Proposal: A request to rezone an approximate 5.1 Acre site from Nlultiple Family Suburban to Residential Manufactured Home for the purpose of establishing a 33-Unit Manufactured Home Park. Location: The site is generally located west of and adjacent to Flora Road, approximately 500 feet south of Sprague Avenue in Section 24-25-44. II. SITE ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan: SUBURBAN Category - Inside General Sewer Service Area (GSSA) Boundary - Inside Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA) Boundary - Inside Urban Impact Area (UTA) Boundary The Suburban category generally suggests a maximum residential density of 2-units per acre; a total of 10-units for this site. However, the location of this site can justify a higher density based on its transitional nature as defined by the Comprehensive Plan's T ransition Area guideline. Sites adjacent to higher intensity land use categories can be approved for a greater density, if they serve as a buffer between .potentially incompatible designations. In this case, a Major Commercial designation adjoins the north boundary and an Urban designation adjoins on Flora Road to the east. 7" ~ - ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) Zoning: Existing on SITE: Multiple Family Suburban (established 1979) and within: - Aqui fer Sensi ti ve Area Overl ay Zone To the NORTH: Agricultural (established 1942) Restricted Industrial (established 1954) To the SOUTH: Agricultural (established 1942) . To the EAST: Residential Manufactured Home (established 1969, 1970, and 1975) To the WEST: Residential Office (established 1981) Agricultural (established 1942) Existing Multiple Family Suburban Zone on site has approval for a maximum 80-apartment units; or approximately 16-units per acre. Residential Manufactured Home zoning to the east of Flora Road was approved in conjunction with subdivisions for individual lot - ownerships at densities of 3.2 to 3.8 units per acre. The Residential Office Zone, west of the site, was originally approved , for a veterinary clinic. A recently proposed Residential Manufactured Home Zone and 12-unit Manufactured Home Park, approximately 1/2 mile due west of this site was denied by the Hearing Examiner Committee. Reasons for the denial were smallness of the site, poor access, and undesirable development alternative. Land Use: Existing on SITE: Undeveloped Open Area To the NORTH: Sewer T runk Line, Retail Building Material, and Motel To the SOUTH: Single Family Residential and Open Area To the EAST: Manufactured Home Subdivisions To the WEST: Office, Veterinary, Single Family, and Open Area Commerci al and retai 1 uses are general ly north of the sewer trunk line and residential uses to the south. The majority of manufactured homes are to the east of Flora Road, while site built homes are to the west. Areas south of 4th Avenue and west of Steen Road are generally developed to large lot residential uses. , . ~ - ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) Site Characteristics: Site Size: Approximately 5.1 Acres Existing Buildings: None Topography: Flat Vegetation: Grass; No Trees Agri cul tural Summary: Suburban category not i ntended for protecti on of agricultural lands. Adjoining Streets: Flora Road to the east of the site is a 50-foot County right of way improved with curbing and two paved lanes. Steen Road to the west of the site is a 40-foot County right of way improved with gravel only. Flora Road has had recent improvements which included paving and curbing. Proposed Site Plan: Use: Manufactured Home Park Proposed Buildings: 33-Units Open Area: 66 % Roads: 15 % Site Coverage: 19 % Stall Sizes: Approximately 4,500 - 5,500 Square Feet Units per Acre: 6.5 Perimeter Setbacks: PROPOSED REQUIRED Front Yard (Flora Road) 25' 25' Front Yard (Steen Road) 25' 25' Side Yard (R) 10' 10' Side Yard (L)' 10' 10' Parking: 66 Spaces 66 Spaces (2 per Stall) . ' ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO.- ZE-52-85 II. SITE ANALYSIS (continued) Proposed Buffering Techniques: Site Plan proposes 6-foot privacy fence on north and south property lines and a 3-foot chain link fence adjacent to Flora and Steen Roads. The entrances from the two County roads are planned to be landscaped. The two cul de sacs will also have a landscape feature. Ordinance standards require individual stall landscaping within 90 days of occupancy and continued maintenance. Other Site Plan Considerations.: The development is proposed in two phases; the,eastern portion with 18 stalls and access fromn Flora Road as the first, and the western 15-units with completed access to Steen Road the second phase. No timing of phases is indicated. A recreational vehicle storage area, near mid-site, is proposed as part of phase ones note: - The site plan submitted for review by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee is general in nature. Detailed review to determine compliance withall Ordinance regulations and conditions of approval is recommended-to be administrative and to occur at the Building Permit stage. III. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS Densi ty: Proposed densi ty of 6.5-Uni ts per.acre i s 9.5-Uni ts per acre ' less, or 47 fewer units, than currently approved under the Multiple Family Suburban zoning. However, the proposed Park is nearly double the density of adjoining residential ownership ,developments to the east. Design: The recreational vehicle storage area should be completely sc reened f rom adjacent and Park views. Use of the storage area must be limited to tenants only. The private road approaches to County roads are required by Ordinance to be a minimum of 34-feet, not 30-feet as shown. Buffering/Landscaping: The proposed fences along the site's perimeter help serve as a butfer and should be residential in character with wood- material or slatted chain link. A further vegetative treatment, 8 to 10-foot trees spaced 50 feet around the perimeter,'should add to the buffering from commercial on the north and to lower density residential to the east. -The above conditions, together with proposed landscape entrances and required stall landscaping should help the proposal fit into the area and reduce compatibility concerns. . , - . , . rZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 III. SITE DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS (continued) Circulation/Access: Steen Road will be required to be improved to access standards; however, improvement could be handled through a CRP or RID. Sewa e Disposal: Connection to the Valley Sewer is required by County Uti~ties and the Health District. Sewer design will be as approved by Utilities. . Water Supply: Consolidated Irrigation District can sewer the site. n IV. SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and was reviewed by the County Planning Department. The review considered the specifics of the proposal, other available information, County ordinances, other regulations and laws, possible standard Conditions of Approval, the Generalized Comprehensive Plan, and other County policies and guidelines. The Zoning Administrator has determined that "No probable significant adverse impacts" would result from the - proposal being developed and has issued a Detemination of Non-Significance ("DNS"). The "ONS" was circulated to nine other agencies of jurisdiction and other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review and comment. The "DNS" comment period ends J uly 2, 1985, and . was advertised 15 calendar days before said date in the newspaper, by letter to adjacent property owners within 400 feet of the proposal, . and by notice on a sign posted on the proposal site. The Hearing Examiner Committee may consider additional environmental related . testimony and the "DNS" at the public hearing. V. PLANNING SUMMARY The proposal does fi t the cri teri a for Transi ti on Area as outl i ned i n the Comprehensive Plan. It, therefore, could be approved at a higher density than suggested in the Suburban category, if compatibility issues can be mitigated. The reduction from possibly 80 apartment units to 33 manufactured homes is a primary mitigation measure. The addition of residential landscape treatments and bufferin,g will further help the project be compatible with the residential area. Public services, such as roads, sewer, and water; are available or can be provided to the site. Conditions have been recommended to insure development as outlined. , . . , . . ~ . • - ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 VI. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (Al1 Conditions imposed by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee shall be binding on the-"Applicant", which term shall include the owne r or owners , of the proper°ty, heirs, assigns, and successors.) a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. The Zoning Administrator shall approve a specific exterior lighting plan for the approved area prior to installation of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area with full consideration to adjacent properties). 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for . maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained such that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 3. The appl i cant shal l devel op subj ect property general ly i n - accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following . . changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance.- The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. That prior to release of building permits, the sponsor shall submit a final Manufactured Home Park design plan to the Planning Department which demonstrates compliance with the . . Residential Manufactured Home Zone, Development Standards of Section 4.05A.050-(b-1-9), and all Hearing Examiner Committee conditions of approval. 5. All current standards of the Residential Manufactured Home Zone, as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this si te. 6. Applicant shall comply with '208' recommendations concerning stormwater runoff and provide necessary landscaping for runoff. 7. Any division of land for the purpose of sale, lease or transfer, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting , Ordinances prior to issuance of building permits. . ~ / . , . ' - , . • ZONE-RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this application, and prior to any on-site improvements. - 9. That landscaping as indicated on the submitted site plan be installed and maintained. 10. That fencing indicated on the site plan be installed and be of a residential nature such as wood or slatted chain link. 11. That 8 to 10-foot tall trees be installed around the entire • perimeter at a spacing of approximately 50-feet on center. 12. That the recreational vehicle storage area be screened f rom view of adjacent properties and stalls within the park. 13. That use of the rec reational vehicle storage area is for tenants of the Manufactured Home Park only. b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit: l. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Steen Road for right-of-way pri or to any use of the property. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained f rom the Spokane County Engineer. 3. Applicant shall improve Steen Road in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 2 minimum paving width Access Standard. 4. Applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer road, drainage, and access plans prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. . 5. The applicant shall subnit for approval by the Spokane County . Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project prior to the issuance of any building permit on the property. . so , . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 6. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Paving or surfaci ng as approved by the County Engi neer, wi 11 be requi red for any porti on of the proj ect whi ch i s to be occupi ed or traveled by vehicles. 7. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, his heirs, assigns, and successors. , 8. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a - willing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose i s the f.ormati on of a Road Improvement Di stri ct ( RID ) for sai d imp,rovement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 9. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated herein,- the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 10. The construction of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 11. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washi ngton Standard Speci f i-cati ons for Road and Bri dge Construction, and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 12. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. . ~ „ • . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT l. The owner(s) or Successor(s) in interest agree to authorize the County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a ULID by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this - condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended. 3. Public sewers are to be provided and connection made to the Yalley interceptor. Sewer design to be approved by the County Uti 1 i ti es Di rector. d) COUN7Y HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit for this project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. A public sewer system will be made available for the project. Use of individual on-site sewage systems shall not be authorized. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water se rvice shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. . • 6. Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. . •ti ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT 1. The site is located in Fire District # l. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and . existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 3. T rash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. 4. Building permits will be required for each structure. 5. Where it is desired to have access control gates in residential developments, the following shall apply:The minimum width of roadway, inside of access gate, shall be twelve (12) feet. . - There shall be at least two (2) such drive approaches where the gates are located. One may be used for vehicles exiting. Tire flatting spikes shall not be used unless the entrance is a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide. The gates shall be provided with an approved method of emergency operation in accordance with the fire department standards. Where each drive approach is less than twenty (20) feet in-width and controlled by gates, a secondary means of access shall be provided with a clear, twenty (20) foot unobstructed opening. 6. Fi re fl ow hydrant requi rements for thi s pl at are 500 gal l ons. per mi nute for 30 mi nutes. Hydrants are to be spaced no further than 900 feet and such that structures fall within a 450 foot radi us of sai d hydrants. P1 at sponsor to veri fy speci fic hydrant requirements with Fire District # 1. The plat dedication shall state: "required hydrants shall be installed prior to the issuance of any building permits or sale of any 1 ots". f) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Water Purveyor is Consolidated Irrigation District, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic, fire and . irrigation uses. . . . , ~ • r• ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demolition, excavation and construction projects be controlled. . This may require use of water sprays, tarps, sprinklers, or suspension of activity during certain weather conditions. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities. 2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 3. Al1 travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. It has been determined that fireplaces and wood stoves are a significant source of suspended particulates. The small particles lOmic rons) are respirable and can have an adverse effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if wood stoves/fireplaces are used, that burning be done as efficiently as possible. Al1 wood should be seasoned and stored in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated air pollution levels, we request that use of wood stoves and fireplaces be discontinued. 5. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the construction phase of the project and from motor vehicles using the site following completion of the project and f rom occupants of the proposed project. . 6. All air pollution regulations must be met. . T • ~ ~ ~ r ~ . ~1 o Pr~ ~ ~~~~+~.a~ ~ ~ i~-,~'~ y • LO ~ 'a-~i~, ~'~a,~~ (•U ~-y'~ ~-~-e-~'~.csc~ ~ ~ ~ ~°"C... ~'~~F/1'~-'~ Z .~o~ ~.~',i~ • ~q AGENDA, JULY 3, 1985 - 2- TELEPNONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre 8uilding, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 (Continued from Page #1) ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 3. ZW-28-85 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Generally located'east of and adjacent to Spotted Road, between 47th and 49th Avenues in Section 4-24-42.) Comprehensive Plan: Industrial Proposed Use: Industrial -(No Site Plan) Site Size: Approximately 4.7 Acres Applicant: JIM HAYDEN 2135 North 140th StreetSeattle, WA 98133 4. PUDE-4-80/ EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ZE-155-80 (Generally located at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Liberty Lake Road in Section 22-25-45.) Comprehensive Plan: Urban Existing Zone: Agricultural Suburban Proposed Use: Planned Unit Development of 94 Detached Singl.e Family Dwellings Extension of Time Request: Extension to May l, 1987 Site Size: Approximately 23.5 Acres Applicant: LI6ERTY LAKE VILLAGE, ITD. c/o F. J. Dullanty, Jr. Seafirst Financial Center Spokane, WA 99201-0695 5. MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME (Generally located west of and adjacent to Flora Road, approximately 500 feet south of Sprague Avenue in Section 24-25-44.) Comprehensive Plan: Suburban Proposed Use: 33-Unit Manufactured Home Park Site Size: Approximately 5.1 Acres Applicant: RICHARD MASON South 25 Altamont Street . Spokane, WA 99202 5:00 P.M. - - - ADJOURNMENT (continued) C.0 _ c N~~Y N - 1 , , a, , , . ` ~ t,~-,r ER w ~ q . , ~ .1 ~ ti , OFFI 1 • V = 1„ ~ ► t C O ~ ~ 'v ~ tjl J "t n ~ ~ . . M t~ 00 • P P ' T Z , . - ~ Z ~ , ~ RA~vE._ • ~ ~ ~ V ;E t,. . . t 2 n A N . P pRRGp, ~ . .V. .vr• ~r ~ cc Ro. . ~s=: ~ . ~ . z ~ W 4TN . a "..A~ c ; . ; r . a ~E N 0 . ~ ~AKE ! - ~ l" • . , • 1 . - t; M W ~ o ~2't K , ~ . , _ ~ ~ • i: , ilooo r, i r , • ~ ~ ' 2 ~ t . C • 1 ~ , • i ' •}f,,' •M -t ' ' _ • ~ .►:~7i~~ i ; ` ` - \ ~ , ~ ~i ' ' j \ ~ t7' • I~ ' ` , , I _ =4 tl► PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET ~ rz tid' 6 . PHONE 456-2205 • ` r ~ . . , •.p „ ' , ~ D ~ , . • „s,,, , SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 • . . . . , -r-- r . _ c.. SPOrcANE COUNTY COUAT MOUSC A meeting of the Preliminary Development Conference (Zoning) was held on Friday, July 10, 1987, at 2:00 P.M. for review of a proposed final sit2 development plan for Meadoworook Village Manufactured Home Park (ZE-52-85) located betw2an Flora Road and Steen Road south of the Ualley Sewer Interceptor line. In attendance were Pat Frankovic, County Planning; 6ob McCann, 'County Engineers; Jim Legat and Dean Fowler, County Utilities; Pam Heeter, Health District; Tom Davis, County Building and Safety; and Dick Hason, Applicant. The following conditions still remain to be complied with by the applicant in order for the plan to be formally finalized. Building and Safety Department: 1. A fi re hydrant is requi red on Flora Road in conjunction with the fi rst phase. 2. The na,nes "Flora Place" and "Steen Place" be changed. The word "Place" may sti 11 b2 used but due to confusi on ( fi re department and emergency vehicles) "Flora" and "Steen" should not be used. 3. Lot street addresses can be shown on the site plan. Health District: • 1. Since oublic water and sewer will be provided, the Nealth Disxrict had no concerns and signed-off on all three phases. County Utilities: 1. Applicant needs to work -mith Utilities Department to determine timing of sewer payment in relationship to the phase or phases than can be signed off by Utilities. County Engineers: l. An RID agreement and dedication of five feet additional right of way on Steen Road must be executed by the applicant and other property owners. 2. County Engineers may be able to sign-off Phases I and II, without RID and dedication, if they can be assured that Phase III would not be constructed without Engineers receiving the RID agreement and dedication first. ~ ~ ~`a • PAGE TWO Planning Department: l. A street light must be installed on Flora Road. 2. The RV storage area must be clearly marked "Tenants Use Onlx". 3. Applicant should try to redesign Lot 11 of Phase III so that it has frontage on the park's private road system and therefore becomes functionally tied to the park community. 4. Planning will be the last to sign-off on the site plan and will only sign-off on those phases that all other departments have signed. This will insure that those phases not signed-off by all departments will come back into County review. PAT FRANKOVIC Assistant Zoning Administrator PF:I lm cc: Applicant - Dick Mason Building and Safety - Tom Davis Nealth District - Pam Heeter Utilities = Jim Legat and Dean Fowler Eng i neers - Bob hlcCann Zoning - Steve Horobiowski and Pat Frankovic 0087 ~ -RIGHT OF WAY DEED 'E~~i~~2~18~ 10 _I.N THE MAT'TER of sTEEr: RoAn -No 1890 KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Richard- L. Mason and Nancv K. Mason (husbar_d&mif and --Dan i,'. Lambert (a sin~-le -oersonJAS_XKXjX, of the Count,y of Spokane, i n the State of - Washington, in consideration of the benefits and other valuable considerations, and the sum of vne ar.d no/100 Dol l ars, pai d them by the County of Spokane, the recei pt whereof is hereby acknowledQed, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do qrant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane County, the following described parcel of land, situated in Spokane County, in the State of Glashinqton, to-wit: The East 5 feet of the West 25 feet of that portion of the East Half (E~ ) of the RTortheast Cuarter (NE~:) of the Fortheast Quarter (IIE-z) of Section 24, lying S*outh of the former Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad right of way; - EXCEPT the South 422 feet thereof; AND ALSG EXCEPT any portion thereof lying ~ within Flora Aload. of Secti on 24 , Townshi p 25 North, Ranne__44 , E. W. M. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, unto the said Sookane County for the ourposes of a nuhlic road forever. . IN WITNESS WHEREGFJ,Z have hereunto set pa-i hand ~ and seal thi s_,03 day of ~t~si2~l.v~•~sst.'.%t~1+:iu::v'_': et~ . ~ ~ 1'• ~ l.l' . ~ ~U U V. ~ - ._..w• ~ x .i / . - AY 2 ~ 32 X . . . . R/W 1/1/85 ~ - ~u~.; ~•~y~`~ ~ ` ~ . ~!?c~~'.~~.v~~..Y.~.~_ ~ _ c~~ 4, c, ~ ~ STATE OF WASHI NGTON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ~ On this day of 19`before me personallv an peared 1;'. 1 i 1 1 c-, ~ . l ~ ` i • ~ personally known to me to be theti individual(s) that executed the foregoinq instrumert and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said indi- vidual (s), for the uses and purposes herein mentioned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year first written. . t•:t ~ • . S f fc-',• - ✓'-~~ctr~~~. G~', . ~ ~ ~ - - • • ~ ~ • - ~ c . ~ C Notary Publ ic, In and for the State "o'jf ~ Washington, residing at STATE 0F WASHINGTON ) COUNTY OF SFOKANE ) ss On this day personal ly appeared bef ore me ~ person*wn to me to be the individual ts1 who executed the forgoing instrument and ;a'cl~riokl,e4gy'6,,the said in5trument to be the f ree and voluntary aci and deed of sai~ i~n-d'%~d u~For the uses and purposes therein mentioned. A% ~ ~ Givpn"und~rl,r~'y~,ia~d".and seal t h i s day of ' ~ Notary Fubl ic In and For the State of Washingtons . - • , . ` . • f \ , fnland • Pacific Engineering Transmittal ~ South 25 Altamortt Spokent, WasMngton . ~ 509 535-1410 99202 ' T0: -SPO KRI~!E CQIA(u-Il' ENC IIUEERiIUG DATE :F7EL3 I.50986 C)CPt . . ~ Z'1C ~ PROJECT: ~71ERDD WBT'~00< Vt LLFt6E rn.fif. Pf~1~i~ L . ~ ATTENTION: CARY Gentlemen: We are sending M enclosed under separate cover copies of the following: Description /W Blueline Prints Copy of Letter Original Drawing Contract Documents Work Authorization /X/ Report No. Copies Date Description I 5E7- S F; E~T S~f OF zf- ~ 2/ 13 / 8!o D EZ RI(OFtGE RV-:-PORT- R(=5 PO RlSC- S Requested Action / / Information Review & Comments Distribution - . /7C/ Written Approval Signatu're & Return Remarks . . -3 fiE B LU c-=LJ/U E DRA W I lU 65 PAl; C BEF/U RE Ttl R/lj E D T-D W 1`7H G H a!U 6E S 1 h iE D_ 1 F T HESE CtIl9/U6iffS YDUR RPPROUFd- PLERSE RfftTIUP.lU BLUF=LJ/UES SO WC mRY mF~KF- CtfRNbff-S TO OKl C~1IURl THAN.< YOu. Sincerely, - IPILAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. ~ By : ~yn ~ ~ ~ . c , MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK RESPONSE TO DRAINAGE ANALYSIS COMMENTS .BY SPOKANE COUfVTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT BY: , ,..~y° 6~;~~ s~ • February 13, 1986 Inland Pacific Engineering Co. . South 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 ~ RESPONSE TO JANUARY 23, 1986 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS COMMENTS Page 1 Comment: From Street Only Response: Yes, the total paved surface was large enough that the peak flow could be greater from it than the total drainage basin. Comment: Circled the travel length of 190 feet Response: As indicated on sheet 2 of 4 attached, the travel distance is plotted. Comment: A question regarding street and pipe_flow Response: I assumed one minute flow time along the street and pipe to reach the disposal point. Tc overall should read Tc overland. Page 2 Comment:- A question regarding disposal rate Response: The calculation shown was to determine the rate at which the drywell (as detailed on sheet 2 of 4) could dispose of runoff, using 72"/hr./ft.2 of surface contact area. Comment: Storage volume calcs required Response: See following tabular hydrograph. ~ . ; ~ i ' . . / ia . . . . e...._ . . _ . . _ . y , a 1900 FT 3 - • 's Ft . .ISCFS. • , t f ~r'~laf y• ~ .t " ' 4 ~.'►~1 : J 1 O ~ . . + IZ.O 13,a . . IN a Chr.~ ~ . . , . , • 2 < Comment: Calcs for '208` area needed Response: As done in the past we have indicated the required area necessary to meet 208 requirements. The approximate configura- . tion is shown to scale on plan sheet 2/4 with dimensions where possible. Page 3 . Comment: Circled the travel length of 190 feet Response: As indicated on sheet 2 of 4 attached, the travel distance is plotted. Comment: Storage volume calcs required Response: See follotiving tabular hydrograph 1.0_ G ; ; ~ ~ i 335 FT 3 .18CF5 o-i 4 i 11.6 12.0 13.0 C hr. ) . . _ - ~ ~ O 3 Page 4 . . Comment: Calcs for 208 area needed (Area B) Response: Area is noted on sheet 2 of 4 in approximate configuration and dimensions shown wriere possible. Comment: Calcs for 208 area needed (Area C) Response: Same as response above. Comment: Quesion why on my assumption regarding pond volume necessary. Response: The peak is very similar to Area B and assuming a triangular hydrograph with a base of .7 hr. and height of .55 cfs we get a volume of 690 ft.3 which is less than 800 ft.3 available. Comment: Calcs for 208 area needed . Response: See sheet 2 of 4 for approximate configuration and dimensions. Comment: Areas of MH Park not addressed in report. Response: The small areas that are shown developed but have no calcu- lations developed are that way for a reason. The overall development drains from north to south. By picking up 70% of the area and disposing that into drywells, I assumed the remaining 30% would be far less than the existing flow that would have drained onto the property to the south. The areas that were allowed to drain south are primarily grassed areas with proposed MH units and no street drainage. Comment: What about off-site areas? Response: I have indicated on the drainage map the area to the north which drains onto the proposed development. Sheet 2 of 4 , Comment: Ditch design , Response: See following calcs: q ~ ,i Area of road .25 acres ~ C coef. is .9 ~ I i s 3.18 Q = CIA , _ .9(3.18).25 _ .72 cf s . . • 4 Q = 1.49 AR2/3 S1/2 _ . n side slope of channel 5:1 n = .03 S = .02 Trial 1 .3'depth 2/3 A = .45 ft.2 R2/3 _ A WP .28 , WP = 3.06 ft. Q= .89 approx. equal to calculated Q V= Q/A 1 1.97 fps this is allowable velocity actual conditions would be less for Q=.72 cfs . . . O.K. Ito Inland PPPIF' Paci f ic ra nS i a Engineering Sadh 25 Attirt*nt 8poicanw, Mh~on Sp9 515-1410 29202 TO : 5 )b'r~ ~ 60UK1Ty DAT E : /Zi / f° 0~~v~~°/x,t~ D~~?: N S// ~'~'-A,,esoAcJ SRbKJ4,vE t,!/i4 992,o/ ~ PROJ ECT : !1/i-L,4de A)o61z,E 114me, PAe-C iaE s2l-0~5 9a61 ATTENT ION : 64,eV Ajez6m/ ✓ Gentlemen: We are sending X enclosed under separate cover copies of the following: Description ~j Blueline Prints / i Copy of Letter . Original Drawing L_/ Contract Documents Work Authorization Report I/ No. Copies Date Description 1 9 4A,~ . Requested Action / % Information / / Review & Comments Distribution IY Written Approval Signature & Return i I Remarks . ~~&Aal 0/0 AZZ Sincerely, INIAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. ; , , By: - . a, , . a, OFP'ZCE OF COUNTY ENGINEER . ~ . R O B E R T S. T U R N E R ~ , , ~ i~:-~_.,'~n_~,,,t' ~~,,R.• COUNTY ENGINEER -jr :T► _..t: ` iJX ~ s I• y,~ ~ ;.:7;t':1' j 7 D . . . _ 99260 $POKANt COUhiY COUpT KOU5C ~ a, S . ~ • ~ RE: 14l) 0 u/QRO4~ Gentlemen: A review of the road, drainage, and parking plans for the above-refer- enced plat, short plat, binding site plan, and/or building permit has been accomplished. Areas of concern to us are indicated in red on the attached prints. Please make the corr.ections and resubmit them to this office in order that the review process may proceed. When the plans are resubmitted, mark all changes on the revised print in color. If you have any questions about this review, please contact us at 456-3600. Thank you. Sincerely, Robert S. Turner, P. E. Spokane County Engineer ary S. Nelson, P. E. Planning Engineer GSN/set Attachment S/30/4 Public Works Building North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 (509) 456-3600 l ~ . SIS ~ntlaan~~a~ ~~0~ . pRAINAG~ ANA~~ , NVri a13n~~338 for WBRD~K ~ I~`A~~ ' . ME~O~ Mob, l e~Ome by •Z„"a3`'".~. ~.;iv • t`!C't~a` • <Y((~''~ t%; p u G,L"f' ~ '1 ~ ~ • ~ ~~'•:'4: /~~,t a- bt ~ (~i..~ ~ ~E"•, 'j`` . ~ ~Y , y r ~ ~J~ ( L ` , j' h. • ♦ . j~ 17~'t ~ • r} r ~ . n •r .•tC ~G~-: ,-i , • ;r ~ ~ „p . r~ / [1 ••o4• r~.` /•.,y j 4 t / ~►jr'.~:~;y ~S- ✓ . ~ r ~ ng Go . fl~ En9~nee Inl and p a~ 1 tamont stre 202 SoUth 2-5 Washington gg Spokanes • 3anuary 23 9 1996 . . . A 1 ' Site Location and DescriQtion . The project is located in the Spokane Valley south of Sprague Avenue and east of Sullivan Road. , . The SCS Soil Survey mapping indicates the soils to be Garrison Gravelly Loams 0-5% slope. (See attached soils map) AREA A 2.20 ACRES ' Sidewalk & Paving .45 acres @ .9 = .404 . , Driveway .14 acres @ .9 = .125 Gravel .15 acres @ .5 = .075 Roof .23 acres @ .9 = .208 Grass 1.23 acres @ .1 = .123 . 2.20 .935 . C weighted = .935 ; 2.20 _ .425 . Tc paving = 5 min or less I = 3.18 Q = CIA = .9 (3.18) .45 = 1.29 cfs l ~ I ~ ~ Tc overall =.15 pk.00024 .4}~ '6 = 12.3 min add- l min for street & ! pipe flow Tc = 13.3 min (.2 hr) I = 1.85 C = .425 Q= CIA =.425(1.85) 2.2 = 1.73 cfs USE TABULAR DISCHARGE TABLE TO DETERMINE STORAGE . Table 12 Tc =.2, Tt = 0 @ 11.9 hr. = 796 . 796 (x) = 1.73 cfs x=.0022 Constant for hydrograph table , ' -..r~. f : ^ . ~ . . hr. 11.0 11.5 11.7 11.8, 11'.9 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Flow .05 .10 .45 1.11 1.73 1.39 .92 .52 .37 (cfs) . 12.4 12.5 12.7 13.5 .30 .26 .18 .10 With the propos.ed drainage structure the expected disposal rate is .18 cfs. This would allow the pond to absorb the peak flow volume. dis osal rate = ~3.52?f + 2 . # ? ( p ( ) (4( tf 3 5) 72 1 1 .18 cfs e kpwoMi► $1414t S hr 12 602 ' Volume to be stored above the .18 cfs disposal rate from tabular hydrograph is approximately 1900 ft3. '208' Pond size calculation • .45 acres sidewalk & paving . , .07 acres driveways .52 acres 208 Area 52 x 1/2" 43,560 ft2 = 1887 ft2 14 f 6" t S /p ~Q A", 8 PUC Culvert within Basin A . Q = 1 .49 .008 'iY .332 (.33 4/3 ~ .013 2 = 1.08 cfs 1.08 cfs < peak Q of 1.29 cfs dn = .67' Vn = 3.7 fps ' . Ent. head = .l' Vel. head = .2' Fric. head = -1.88' Totl hd. = 2.85' f 1 ow 1 i ne = 31. 40 . , e HW = 34.25' J' ` ' • . . This isapproximately 1.2' above top of curb. The time period for which this wil1 last is minimal and realistically the depth would never reach 1.2' above top of curb because the volume of area between curbs would absorb the peak and the pipe would pass the flow,fairly rapidly. AREA B .9 acres Sidewalk & Paving .14 acres @ .9 = .126 Driveways . .06 acres @ .9 = .054 Roof .06 acres @ .9 = .054 Grass .64 acres @ .l = .064 .90 .298 . C weighted = .298 .9 _ .331 Tc Paving = 5 min. or less . I = 3.18 Q = CIA = .9 (3.18)~.14 = .40 cfs . . .4) ' = 12.3 min. Tc Overall =.15 P-OC024 - ' I = 1.90 Q = CIA = .331 (1.9) .9 = .57 USE TABULAR DISCHARGE TABLE TO DETERMINE STORAGE Table 12, Tc =.2, Tt = 0 @ 11.9 Iir = 796 796 (x) _ .57 x = .0007 . hr. 11.0 11.5 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.5 flow (cfs) .02 .03 .15 .36 .57 .46 .30 .18 .12 .09 With t3e proposed drainage structure the volume required for storage is 335 f t. t L S ~ , . . . . . . , . ~ . , '208' Pond Size Calculations ' .14 acres sideti•ralk & paving .06 acres driveways . .20 . 0 '208' Area =.20 (112") 439560 ft. 2 = 726 ft.2 a oR ? • 6" ~ . ' • ~ ~ cs ~ ~ A AREA C .90 Acres A o ~ Same as Area 6 with a slight increase in the peak flow but not enough to be significant. '208' Pond Size Calculation . .12 acres sidewalk b paving ~ .06 acres driveways . .18 acres 11 d '208' Area = .18 (112") 43,560 ft. = 653 ft.2 • ~ 'j 6" ~ C~ 0 ~ Ilr~ 0 AREA D .36 Acres Sidewalk & Paving .20 acres @ .9 = .182 Driveways .02 acres @ .9 = .018 Roof .02 acres @ .9 = .018 Grass .12 acres @ .1 = .012 .36 .230 C weighted = .230 =.36 = .639 Tc< Smin I = 3.18 Q = .639 (3.18) .36 ~ •7 3 Assume volume of pond adequate to store the flow greater than .18-cfs. '208' Pond Size Calculations . .20 acres sidewalk & paving .02 acres driveways . .22 acres ` e . '208' Area =.22 (1/2") 439560 ft.2 = 798 ft.2 6" ~ ' e ~ O~ • ~ 4 R f td , 4`f ro, l A n m.~. . . . . k/A ki t A ~O o •'F f t ~ r A r~c.v~ . " S ~ -~1► ~ S ~ ~ a Xf ~ • . / r . ' • Inland ■ Pacific Engineering . Transmittal ~ . Scuth 25 Altamont Spoiune. WuhlnQton , 509 535-1410 99202 T0: S~f''U KRtl1E CDU1U-TY ENG 1NC-ERi/UC DATE :JC:7EL3 13 i19810 C) EPT= PROJECT: mF=:ADO W a1',%oOK V1 LLPt6E rn:M. PA Ri< ATTENT I ON :6--f~ RY Gentlemen: We are sending M enclosed under separate cover copies of the following: Description /Y4 Blueline Prints Copy of Letter Original Drawing Contract Documents Work Authorization /X/ Report / % . No. Copies . Date Description l SCT' SHEETS ~f OFZV- P 2l I3i9L D R R if0 RC E RCPORT- REI=--.-:, POrJSC-S Requested Action % / Information Review & Comments Distribution . . /X/ Written Approval Signature & Return Remarks -TtiE 8LL1 ELfPJE DI?A W! lU6S 1-f R U E Bc F/U RE Tu2lU ffDT"o Vt! ITIi C NRnf6E S 1N ►eED_ t F THC-SE CrIfi/UGES- YOU►R RPPitWPft- PLEP6E RETURIU BLUE=1J/UES SD WC tr7A-Y tnA-KF-- LNAN6ffS t u OKI C~11UA~l 45, i HAiVK ti'0U. - Sincerely, INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. By • ~ - - MEADOWBROOK VILLAGE MOBILE HOME PARK RESPONSE TO DRAINAGE ANALYSIS COMMENTS BY SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . BY: vqA$q't'~-!~e00~ , ` ; • O 6jZ.•r ~ ~,a ,r ' ' • F ~ ~a~~.~B'@• ~ • February 13, 1986 Inland Pacific Engineering Co. South 25 Altamont Spokane, WA 99202 { . . . RESPONSE TO JANUARY 23, 1986 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS COMMENTS Page 1 Comment: From Street Only Response: Yes, the total paved surface was large enough that the peak flow could be greater from it than the total drainage basin. Comment: Circled the travel length of 190 feet Response: As indicated on sheet 2 of 4 attached, the travel distance is plotted. Comment: A question regarding street and pipe flow Response: I assumed one minute flow time along the street and pipe to reach the disposal point. Tc overall should read Tc overland. Page 2 . . Comment: A question regarding disposal rate Response: The calculation shown was to determine the rate at which the . drywell (as detailed on sheet 2 of 4) could dispose of runoff, using 72"/hr./ft.2 of surface contact area. Comment: Storage volume calcs required Response: See following tabular hydrograph. B • ~ ~ • ! 4 ~ ~ ~ G"' ~ V O ✓ 2, 0- C . . ~ R d0 F T 3 1.0 _ 19 ,m r'~•.•;`.,:~ . • , .6' . ~ . ~ ~ ~ v ~ . ` ,'~•jkr. ~ - _ ~ 18 C F5 ~ . II.~ 12.0. 13,C ~ C hr,~ - ~ P • . 2 Comment: Calcs for '208` area need'ed ' Response: As done in the past we have indicated the required area necessary to meet 208 requirements. The approximate configura- . tion is shown to scale on plan sheet 2/4 with dimensions where possible. _ Page 3 . Comment: Circled the travel length of 190 feet Response: As indicated on sheet 2 of 4 attached, the travel distance is plotted. Comment: Storage volume calcs required Response: See following tabular hydrograph i r . ~ ~ 335 FT 3 .18CF5 o-i 11.6 12.0 13.0 ~ - a~?.,~ >e- 3~:~~ r 3~ d- r • ' 3 Page 4 . Comment: Calcs for 208 area needed (Area B) Response: Area is noted on sheet 2 of 4 in approximate configuration and dimensions shown where possible. Comment: Calcs for 208 area needed (Area C) Response: Same as response above. . Comment: Quesion why on my assumption regarding pond volume necessary. Response: The peak is very similar to Area B and assuming a triangular hydrograph with a base of .7 hr. and height of .55 cfs we get a volume of 690 ft.3 which is less than 800 ft.3 available. Comment: Calcs for 208 area needed Response: See sheet 2 of 4 for approximate configuration and dimensions. Comment: Areas of MH Park not addressed in report. Response: The small areas that are shown developed but have no calcu- lations developed are that way for a reason. The overall development drains from north to south. By picking up 70% of the area and disposing that into drywells, I assumed the remaining 30% would be far less than the existing flow that would have drained onto the property to the south. The areas that were allowed to drain south are primarily grassed areas with proposed MH units and no street drainage. Comment: What about off-site areas? Response: I have indicated on the drainage map the area to the north which drains onto the proposed development. Sheet 2 of 4 Comment: Ditch design , Response: See following calcs: • = , Area of road .25 acres C coef. is .9 ~I is 3.18 ~ ~ Q=CIA _ .9(3.18).25. . ~ - _ .72 cfs . i A . 4 Q= 1. 49 AR2/3 S1/2 n side slope of chann2l 5:1 n = .03 S = .02 Trial 1 .3'depth 2/3 A = .45 ft.2 R2/3 _ A WP .28 ~ WP = 3.06 ft. Q= .89 approx. equal to calculated Q V= Q/A = 1.97 fps this is allowable velocity actual conditions would be less for Q=.72 cfs O.K. .1r OFFICE C1F COUNTY ENGINEER ' SpOKANE COUNTY, WASHiNGT4N Dota 19 Inter-oftice Communicatian To ~ , ,o~ . 1 `r= frorn Subject ova i c. k ~ RS ta,- ; ~ _A_ 6 ~ ~ ~ 4-o r-- . ~ ~ . ~ rarm ?:7-~ ? f 1 r ~16 A ~ ~ ~~p~I~1p,GE A"A~'Y 5 ~98F1. NVf'a Ci3AI3339 for MEA~~ . Mob, l e Nome p ark by .s~r p~ • C' ~ i' ~ / dc.J;' ~ L~ •rCJL` pA6°r'(1~`~, Sp GE y~ it~ Ti'C PV ~ 9:~► ~ w O L C a ~ ~ ~ ~•r3 Q t,+ F (x , i~h+ ~Catc :~5' ~~~+~y~„~°✓ C°. 1 ana P aclf, C ont Street SoutIR 25 AJ sh~ ngt0~' 99202 Spokane, Wa . lgg6 - ,January 23, . . . . Site Location and Description The project is located in the Spokane Va11ey south of Sprague Avenue and east of Sullivan Road. The SCS Soil Survey mapping indicates the soils to be Garrison Gravelly Loams'0-5% slope. (See attached soils map) AREA A 2.20 ACRES Sidewalk & Paving .45 acres @ .9 = .404 , Driveway .14 acres @ .9 = .125 Gravel .15 acres @ .5 = .075 Roof .23 acres @ .9 = .208 Grass 1.23 acres @ .1 = .123 2.20 .935 , C weighted = .935 ; 2.20 _ .425 Tc paving = 5 min or less I = 3.18 Q = CIA = .9 (3.18) .45 = 1.29 cfs ~ ? .4)~ '6 = 12.3 min add 1 min for street & ~ Tc overall =.15 P~-00024 pe flow l pi Tc = 13.3 min (.2 hr) I = 1.85 C = .425 Q= CIA =.425(1.85) 2.2 = 1.73 cfs USE TABULAR DISCHARGE TABLE TO DETERMINE STORAGE Table 12 Tc =.2, Tt = 0 @ 11.9 hr. = 796 796 ( x)= 1.73 cf s x=.0022 Constant for hydrograph table _ _ . , hr. 11.0 11.5 - 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 Flow .05 .10 .45 1.11. 1.73 1.39 .92 .52 .37 (cfs) . 12.4 12.5 12.7 13.5 .30 .26 .18 .10 With the proposed drainage structure the expected disposal rate is .18 cfs. This would allow the pond to absorb the peak flow volume. (disposal rate = (3.52?f ) + C4 (2-ri 3.5) 7211 1 1 = .18 cfs 4.W ~ hr 12 602 Volume to be stored abov3 the .18 cfs disposal rate from tabular hydrograph is approximately 1900 ft . E c A~C S~ '208' Pond size calculation ` .45 acres sidewalk & paving . .07 acres driveways .52 acres 208 Area 52 x 1/2" 43,560 ft2 = 1887 ft2 14 t 6" c.~. ~ ~ S ~0 ~P ~ ~c! 8 PVC Culvert within Basin A Q = 1.49 4.008 .332 .33 . 4/3 0 2 , .013 = 1.08 cfs 1.08 cfs< peak Q of 1.29 cfs dn = .67' Vn = 3.7 fps Ent. head = .l' Vel. head = .2' Fric. head = -1.88' Totl hd. = 2.85' flow line = 31.40 . . ~ HW = 34.25' , . . i This is approximately 1.2' above top of curb. The time period for which . this will last is minimal and realistically the depth would never reach 1.2' above top of curb because the volume of area between curbs would absorb the peak and the pipe would pass the flow fairly rapidly. AREA B .9 acres Sidewalk & Paving .14 acres @ .9 = .126 Driveways ~ . .06 acres @ .9 = .054 Roof ' .06 acres @ .9 = .054 Grass .64 acres @ .1 = .064 .90 .298 C weighted = .298 + .9 _ .331 Tc Paving = 5 min. or less . I = 3.18 Q = CIA = .9 (3.18)~.14 = .40 cfs .4) ' = 12.3 min. Tc Overall =.15 P-OC24 ( I = 1.90 Q = CIA = .331 (1.9) .9 = .57 USE TABULAR DISCHARGE TABLE TO DETERMINE STORAGE Table 12, Tc =.2, Tt = 0 @ 11.9 Iir = 796 796 (x) _ .57 x = .0007 hr. 11.0 11.5 11.7 11.8 11.9 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.5 flow (cfs) .02 .03 .15 .36 .57 .46 .30 .18 .12 .09 With t3e proposed drainage structure the volume required for storage is 335 ft . E ( L S ? Y '208' Pond Size Calculations .14 acres sidewalk & paving . .06 acres driveways . .20 0 ( l ) A ~Ox . '208' Area =.20 1 2" 43,560 ft.2 = 726 ft.2 ~ ° + ? 6" ~ ~o~~ AREA C .90 Acres 1 Same as Area B with a slight increase in the peak flow but not enough to be significant. '208' Pond Size Calculation . .12 acres sidewalk & paving .06 acres driveways . .18 acres 6 ~o '208` Area = .18 (1/2") 43,560 ft.2 = 653 ft.2 • ~ 'f 611 0 00\ e AREA D .36 Acres Sidewalk & Paving .20 acres @ .9 = .182 Driveways .02 acres @ .9 = .018 Roof .02 acres @ .9 = .018 Grass .12 acres @ .1 = .012 .36 .230 C weighted = .230 ~-.36 = .639 Tc C 5 min ~ I = 3.18 -73 Q = .639 (3.18) .36 ~ , ~ Assume volume of pond adequate to store the flow greater than .18 cfs. '208' Pond Size Calculations .20 acres sidewalk & paving .02 acres driveways . 22 'acres . '208' Area =.22 (1/2") 439560 ft.2 = 798 ft.2 6" _ L ? rA r ~ r~ • o k/A.. t A `a ff,: ~e f1~ ~ s r~e ~ ~ ~div'fT 4 Ir 1 . / ~ • ~ ~ "_1 f r? . ~~~~~~~~?'(+~,41~~ ~ •~A~` 1~ r, .JirT'~'~ t t~ .1 f 1 y•,;~ •i ~ ~~5,.: ~ y t~.i • • "M , 'j ~ / - - Yr~""'. ~ =y, ~ . • _ yi ~ i `"~"u,,,I ` ~.•~Y~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ . t ~ ~ . }M A'r ~ ~~,~y, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ti:_ , S +f~~ ~7• ' ; ~3 ~~,tt.,}~'{"j~' ~ 'Am♦f ~ • ~,~l•~ t t E,~ *•~t~l~ ' ~i .~r ~'x:' ,~L 3 t'i j}_ ~ y~ i ~ ' ♦ .~t- t" .r,f ~a'~y+- I~ ~ ~ ~ ~'G~j~ -'~w ~~~N►7 g ~ ~ ' ~~f' ~ ~i i'L ~ t ~ +x'.,~~ ~ r..,~~ ' ~,4!'~l~;~,~5'< _,'~-.r ~ - x. ~ .r t~ ~ t.. •;'Mie~{ •'1 -•;~;~S.1R'~' L c, t • v ~ ~ ~i ..t ~ . 1 a '~i"j~ •.w~ ~ l~ T~' ~~U~+ ' 1.r ~ '~''~7 'y t•" . •~s 4 • ~ R.'~~~' i~t' ,:4~a. w► ,r ~~''S.~" '1~, ,y~ ;l_ ,r T ~ lK~,~ f y~ ~ .r: ~ k.~ ,~+J ti ~~~s3 ~~.~C _ y w ,~'k•?' 1 , g~, _ .J ti.- . r~ . ~ ' ~ ' r ~~t . . ` ~ ~y~ , ~ . t# ~•r5 ,::s„7•~ ~,;,,~,,.~t~t . ~s- r E ~EZ3 ; ;'s`, ~ t~ ~.,~,Y;• r ~ ;y~' :T-~ Y ' K+' s • , '~JC''~~S , ~t 4 ~ ' ~ y ' } ~ s~~~, t ,1~~,~~z~ Y . ~ - l .^-..-1.~`4.~ ~•~S+~f ~~Ly }k_r;~'"'"~~~`~. LrCrf .'N•~•r /j,~~N,1?` !J~t~. •ftlry"''.~..7Y ~ 'i~ •s~'' _ ~~~t~~~' 1 :~~~~5~ ~t~',7~ .i ~~~4~- ~'7. ♦ 4 ~k.~~~-.1 ..~.~:~,~t1~~;~ ~ ~~`..~0 ~~w~.~.-~~a ~ i ~ yv~, ' ~,.y - 4~'~ - s ~ t • ~ t.. . « ~ d; ~ ~t,.j i, ' }.r • ` ~c J ' ~ ~ ~ cyr__i , t l ! ~r M • i fa: ut ~-..1.✓. . ~',F~ ~~~.r ~►1'lb' ~v ~ . . +Y~ ~ 2 :7P`• ' ~ -S fI ~ - t *~.CG , r ~ ~ •,iC . ~ ~ j • a ~P l r , r - '7, - ~ ~ , ~ ; ~ ~a~- , ~.`a x ~ , ~ f~ i ~ L~,~ • ~ s ~ ,4 ; , ~ . " ~r ~ { J,,,, a . f _ ~ ~ Qsi~ ~ 'f~ ~g - f • „~~As ~S;'= r ~ L:'~ r . ~3_> s"~!i ' - _ ~ y . ; ~ ' ~ a v : ` * ~ l~' .}'c~ . . ~tl y ~i ~ ~ . `jt*A=w~ o'~'~5g;;~~ ' ; • : 3 r~~! ~..~:i',x`',;~• ~'r i. .tiy C.r~. ,I~ .'v`. C '1,~,5; - ' ~ • t~. d - ~ Oi f'~ ~ . t ~ [ f-~ +v~ ~ ~ y ' f • ~C ~ ~ f ' ~ ' Ba '~y~ .:g~.. T a+~~~ ; ` ~ ~S~ y. ~ ~ . . . 4I, ~H ~ ~ Y S ` = J ,1 ~~i ~ ~r /f/ • t f _ ,~~i.. ~ .~s;f.e• ~~~'g ,sE3 ~ ~'ar ~ ~ i Mc , r ~ Y~~. t i ; j~ ~ `~'~J ~ ' ',T. ~ 4' • r , y _ ~ ~ - -~:.;t .J t''~ .t ~ y=~;.t i••' ~~'j - _~~s •t j ~ . t ✓ ,.i ~ ~3.~'•~c.~~'e.J. M ~ : V~~ . « _!..'s~ t~~~/''~ T ~ ~ r ` ,a ✓A ~~~r7~V:~~ • ! C_~. t ~ t~,j,~•• , f~K.~ AT^ . ACi~ ~ • 1 ~f' v ~j•'r~~ ~ ~ . ~Y :~i.• ' ,~i ~ . j/ r~.t ~i 4y',~iJ~ r"~ j+•~ R~ `.L , 1! ^~f, 1? Q~ ~ d~` ~ n r-/~~ ' i l• J ~ , . R~ . ~ .r ~ ~ ~.:i . " , r. i~Y~, 'T 4 f-. ~ ' :t`F~58 • 1 ~c " ' ~1'i'j''~ q `~►~4, +,f,`,,, ...r ,n t'• i ~ret. j,.~~T `f . :r ` r F PS,~ . t l~~ 1~ . -~f::~y', t.` v c' ~.t~ ; S- i , r ; l1 ~ '.1., '~~y q ~-~~~X ~i?. r. .,f. Sy"~~~~'~'i "u r.'r~' ` ` ~ _ +y ~ i~'~ ~ f ~j -~Z ~,r~~ ~ ~ ~ r 1~.• ' ~`~'iYf - ~ti' ~i,~ ~i~ ,s ~ 4 Y~ _ n• j ~ . t~1.` y~y ~ i( ~ .c ♦ ~j..' t'c c .I ~ *511'rf~ ~~.C. y ~~1is;~~-7'tr• ,~{f~'~}~;!S r~t?'J~ ~~}~y„i:.:,~1~~~ Y~* S! •A . . F s _ ~ _ • I fi` y r t 1 t"~• ~ . R. • t ~ . ~ ~ ~.l. F ~ LY A. T~ ~ jr k ~ i~ 5G ~`.4C ~ ty~~ i 1• : \ • ~ ~ ; ~ ~ st7Vt rT1~ , ' et•. ~w z M ~ f ~l•. 1~ a .+~i s~: , F ;r~t, ~ li ~ ~ . ,`~r 3~~'^~ i,_ . r s (=i - ~ ~f~ ~ . ir + . ~ r hy wiF ~ ,.r `~iS ~-.yyi'"''~',a.a.n~T ft' ?+~i, . i~.• ..-~,~.•,,,,~,~4: t c 4Jkj ' J , 't'rt~►-`• '',g~~ `,r~,t ~L: is' , r. 'Sx «;t, ► ~~~~Y~ r` • ti` `'~iRY~~-1 ~I:t, ~r'~-sl ~•~j5 " _t . M w► i"~'~ '7 -i ~ ~J. ~~j~ ~ ? ?[~yo ~ . a, i~ ~ ~ . - a • '-~r.c . ~s' ? ~ -3.1~ '~C~ ~...,r ~M '~f►~ , . , 4L i: ~~'~'if ~ i i ' r t Y, ~ ~ R T a . ? 1 ✓ . 7 ~ + , ~ ~ .'4i.i t ~ ~ :.~18 ~j~ ~'rrr?~E . # :R 4 'S'►~.,.-`~ ~ _ ' ~ ~'f.l ' . •n X~':. _."~►f~`•~ _~''~y~ .7» •~`i'~:~ c+` `~f 4! C~''t `JS,~" ~ ~ fi t 2 j: ~ .~j ~ a ~ h~ ',ia . ~ .yr.✓~f. ~C': s~ ~Y ' . ~j~ + ✓ ~ QSB ~ ~ A~~ ~,~y,~ ~i j~ ~~,~i~ ~ ~ + ~•i, ''r A 'i,; ►.c~"c. . iS ~ ~ r +i 'UF ' -`fh . , Ps$ •'!j',;,~' ~ ✓`~ya` r _ .;?1~ r ~iJ • ' , • . . . ' ~ i ~ a. ~j,,; ~r ti v~ . w ~ . y ~ ~ • r cj~ 8 y . Y:i ~ . ► ~ j : • = ~Y _ t•.. _ ry ~ v , i psA :f'~-~ ~ ' - f~~l~s•h-`'y,~. t'~, _~s 1~ ' ; SPr • ~ ~"~r' r.. ~.t ~ ~ y r~ ~ -a ~ \ .►"'~s.+~ ~.~+i ~`fi ~ , ~ ~ , ~ CV5~` '1-[n . r ' u ~ t- ~ k • N ~ f,ya {t , a,.• j . ~ t~t.7-.4r~ -A r', rtR^"~ • ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ' +'l~_'.'( ~1.~ 7 , ~ ~~~~~"-,•1 ~,%J.~f : ~ . i~ ~ ~ a • r'c~ ~ ~ ~t' ; ~ ~,r ' t'~k` .r::r . ~ y^~C+~ ~7~'j' • i! ;.ti ~i~~ ~ i ~ y,~ ,',~h' t j F. ..s r~. ,d'~.b f_.: ~ ± ~ . : " ~~t'' .L.♦ t- ~ , Af ~.r a;~r w. ~ ~ ~ ~.5~ . . `~r''k C~ ~ M;.~, , . ~ t~ ' ~ <i.~ , r~,' N~S 6, `-~Y •,e{~:='~ i r r:~ Z? . t h. ~ r~ ~ ~ • r'~ i " `f - s+ :~c~ ' •~t~ ~ : y ~ , ! " f hm , F= ~ • : ~ ~ + ~Jj ~ t•~ t ~ ~ • w1 K • ° ( 1~ • r •r ~ ~ ~ = ti~► ~ Y f~ 'i "~I r ~ f ~ i'l~at' ~ 1~• ~ ~1~ . 7~ + ~ t ' t~ .C~ ~ ~ Ii r ~ ~~?`1; ~ . ry f ~7 : • , r • , Y ~ • ♦ ~l' "`~,~~~t Y~ ~ ♦ 'AL ~ - ~ • Tn'C~„ •'1, h i'~~ ` . ! ►,i ►r{` j ~ t ' . ~ t~^~,, ~ V`~y t+~' w~►r.,j ~/1 ~'~L , 31 s'~ •71~' F r. ' i; l~' ~ • „3 ~ " • . •K .i SOILS MApPING il'n i'a nd - ~ ,~Paci f ic Q Trns En i neerin a mi,tta[l - - 9 9 - ~ South 25 Altamont Spokane, WasMngton . 509 5354410 99202 • To : oaTE : . ,~•~'J67!'iC~~ - ~ so~v ~ P ROJ E CT :4-P _ - = 04/L-E - ATTENTION: Nel .~o A/ Gentl emen : We are sending ~ enclosed under separate cover copies of the following: De- .s~c~~~r~ i-~p t i o n ~B1 uel iner Pri nts Copy of Letter Ori~gi n~al Drawi ng Contract Documents Work A.ut'horization Report No. Copies Date ~ Description ~ . _ An* Aw- ue4s~~ted Act ion . . . . .q . /fTl Information Review & Comments Distribution Wr-i tten Approval Si gnature & Return ~,Re~~~~~:. . . . . ~ ~ ~ S,i acereTy, aa .y - INLAND-,PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. ~ . _ By : ~ - - - ~ S. 117 Flora Rd. Greenacres, WA 99016 June 25, 1985 RECE6%i E1) Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee 1985 N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 RE: ZE-52-85 SPpKA~l~ COUNTY EN~~NEER July 3, 1985 Gent 1 ernen : Since we will be out of town on the date scheduled for this zoning hearing, we want to express our thoughts and concerns as we live directly across the street and in the line of prevailing west and southwest winds from that area 1. Covenants/restrictions to be considered a. No transient rentals b. 14' wide minimum c. Number of vehicles and no junkers parked on each lot d. Grounds properly maintained by each tenant and/or the owner/manager 2. ALL streets paved. 3. Steen Road be paved - dust problem; to divide traffic since Flora Road was just paved last year and already carries a heavy load of traffic and is narrower at the Flora/Sprague intersection which creates a traffic problem when there is parking there. 4. Traffic - South Flora Road is only 4 blocks long but it carries traffic from th-e east, including the Good Samaritan Home. A four day count in 1978 averaged 567 vehicles daily and it has increased considerably since then. We are hoping the improvements bein,g ma-de and the installation of traffic signals at Appleway/Tschirley/Sprague will alleviate some of the problem. 5. This was rezoned as recently as May 1979 (ZE-28-79) listing 4.88 acres. This request lists 5.1 acres. Is 33 lots reasonable for this size area? 6. That front yards f ace Flora and Steen Roads. 7. If the zoning request is granted, a tirne limit be stipulated between the beginning and cormpletion of construction and control of dust be maintained by the contractor during construction - for health reasons as well as others. The information we have been able to secure is reasonably favorable but vague in sorne areas and we have learned through experience these projects need firm guide- lines established from the very beginning. ' Since this is the last item on the agenda, we would appreciate notification if the hearing has to be re-scheduled for a later date. Thank you for your consideration. Sincer7z' , ,L&4 . fc'71 Archie L. ilson Carol Y. Wilson ~+cc: Spokane County Engineer ~ . AGENDA, JULY 3, 1985 - 2- TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2,e-N SPO KANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: 6roadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, WA 99260 (Continued from Page #1) ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 3. ZW-28-85 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Generally located east of and adjacent to Spotted Road, between 47th and 49th Avenues in Section 4-24-42.) Comprehensive Plan: Industrial Proposed Use: Industrial -(No Site Plan) Site Size: ApFroximately 4.7 Acres Applicant: JIM HAYDE(d 2135 North 140th Street . Seattle, WA 98133 4. PUDE-4-80/ EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SUBMITTAL ZE-155-80 (Generally located at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Liberty Lake Road in Section 22-25-45.) Comprehensive Plan: Urban Existing Zone: Agricultural Suburban Proposed Use: Planned Unit Oevelopment of 94 Detached Singie Family Dwellings Extension of Time Request: Extension to May 1., 1987 Site Size: Approximately 23.5 Acres Applicant: LIBERTY LAKE VILLAGE, LTD. c/o F. J. Dullanty, Jr. Seafirst Financial Center Spokane, WA 99201-0695 tr 5. ZE-52-85 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL MANUFaCTURED NOME . (Generally located west of and adjacent to Flora Road, approximately 500 feet south of Sprague Avenue in Section 24-25-44.) ' Comprehensive Plan: Suburban Proposed Use: 33-Unit Manufactured Home Park Site Size: Approximately 5.1 Acres Applicant: . RICNARD MASON South 25 Altamont Street Spokane, WA 99202 5:00 P.M. - - - ADJOURNMENT (continued) AMW ' i . ~ ~ ` . l)F F 1 CE ()F C(►UNTY N.N(~ l NVEk- tiPUKANE COUN"TY , WASH] ti'l,TON ~ ly8~ =J- f~3; ti4,o k,i i ii iiit v !'I,i n ii irig I)epa rCine i i t hK~ ►"I : l~~ iin t y 1 ii"oi' ' ti I)E• par tmeii c '-I i li IKr:'I'. t:.mdi t t~~~i,; (if Apprt)val-Zone Changt-Numbc.~r App 1 tcan r' s Namp ! SO-4/ Sectiun-~L/ Township ,:;?r,_N, KangeV~~EWM ;'Iie fol lawi riK "cundi t iuns of approva 1" Eor tlie above-re ferenced zoiie chanKe are submi Lced tr, t hr SEtiokane C,ot,nty Heari~ig Hxarn.iner Committee or incttision in rhe staff analysis and 'flnding:; and order" of the hearing scheduled 19Ar-,. Pr ior To T'he Iseuance Of A Building Permit . l. Appl icant shall dedicate__5 feet on Sy'EE/v ;iFO,447/ for right-of-way priur to any use of the property. l. Applicant shall dedicate fee[ on for right-of-way and slope easemen[s as necessary prior to any uee of (he pcoperty. 3. Appllcant shal.l dedicate a foot radiu6 on and prior to any use of the proper[y. Applicant shall dedicate feet on and a foot radiue on and for righ[-of-way pr1or to eny use of the proprrty. ' ~ Access permits for approaches to the County Road Syetem shall be obtained froce the Spokane County Engineer. 6. Access permi[s and improvements to muet be opproved by the Washington Depar[ment of nanaportation. 7. Access permits and improvemente to muet be approved by the City of . r~ (a) Applicant sha11 improve sfL~E~ ~,qq~ in a menner coneiatent with Spokane County TYYICAL roadway section No. minimum paving width #cCl:F5<> (b) Applicant shall improve in a manner coneistent vith Spokarie County TYPICAL ruadway section No. minimum paving width . (c) Applicant shall improve ' in a manner consistent with Spokane f;ounty TYE'ICAL roadway ger_tion No. minimum paving width . (d) Applicant shall impr•ove in a manner consistent with SFx)kar►N Coiinty 'I'Yf'ICAL roadway Sectiun No. miii.imiim paving width . (e) O[her sp»ri f ir improvements: _ Aiii►1 i r-.ii►f oh.i I I v,ihmi r 1til :ippr ()v:j] hy Ll►t- tip()kzjne G.),inCy F.ngfneer rc»r1, dratnape, r+n(1 4: llr(,,r ttlii• tst;,mitc•o )f a hii1liIliig permit on the pt'nportY. 4,n'► h-i ipprt►va l hy tlit- :pokane ('ouii[y H:itg inc•ri .►nd tli0 :;I,,4.A111, . i ~ ~ . ~ ~ . < I 4•fillibi owd 4111-;i t c~ svw.l};e Sytil em pIan filii ~~~r l .~~•~w.~t ~i ~11 • ~ . • if'~t ~il t~ ~11' (lf .111y llili 1.11 111'. ;wrITIi t ~ • . r 3 11 A p,irl.liw, 1,1.111 ti1,l tt',,1 f 1c ~•lt'i•~►IsLI~~i~ p I.iii :;Iia l l bC yubinit0.d _tiiti i p p rt,vkfJ hy Cli` aEk) .,i„i(;~~~in ly H_Ilg LlleCC E) 1 lur U► ttte ta5LliiiiCe uE .t build i i~g prrini[ ii Cfir 1) r„Ne rCy. ik! des apli, 14)c,u[iijoli, jiii(i ar'rangsulilo~±itC uf parking r;talls shall he 1n ac.corda►~ce Wlcrt staiidard cratfi~ e ng lne ccl~ig 1) ra c•[ice s. Navitig ur burfacing as apNroved hy Che Cc,unty Engineer, wlll be required tor aiiy }►t►rtiun of the project which iei to be uc:ciipied or travelled by vehicles. 12 The wurd "applicant" 5hall include the uwner ur owners uf the proµurty, hib heirs, assigus, and succNSSUrs. . '13 To cunbtruct the road imE►ruvemeitts s[ated herein, the apNlicant rvay, wi[h the approval uf [he County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant in any petition or reaolution which purpose is ttie farmation of a Road Improvement Dietrict (RID) for said improveme-nt pursuant to KCW 36.88, as ainended. Spokane County will tiot participate in the cost of A thebe impruvements. ~ As an alternative method ot c.onstructing the road improvement stated herein, the appli- cant may, with the appcoval of the County Engineer, accompliati the road improvements stated herein by joining and participeting in a County Road Project (CRP) to the extent . of the required road impravement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of [heee improvements. ~ . ' 15 The conatruction of the road imprnvementa etated herein ehall be accompliehed as ap- ~ proved by the Spoksne County Engineer. - (06 A11 required iIDprovements shall oonform to the current State Of Waehington Standard Specifications for Road end Bridge Conetruction, and ocher applicable county e[andarda ~ and or adopted reeolutiona pertaining Go Rned Standerds and Stormwater Management in ~ effect a[ the date of construction, unleas othervioe epproved by the Gounty Englneer. , •s ~ 17. Applican[ shall file a petition for the vacation of prior to any use o f the pro per t y. 18. Applicant ehall conatruct a peved etid delineated aceeae approach(e) to meet the exieting ' pavement on • # 19. Accesa to Road shall be prohibited unti 1 euch time es specif lcelly authorized by the Spokane Caunty Engineer. Z0. Roadway standarde, typical roadway sections and dcainage plan requirraents are found in Spokane Board of Councy (:unwlssioners R,esolution No. 80-1592 aet awended ond are applicablc: to this proposal. 11. This plat or development pruposal ie 1'ocated within a'drainage baein which hae been identified by the Spukane County Engineer'e Uffice as having scurmwacer runoff problecus. Since this plat or dtvelopment proposal is affected by or is a contributor to stormwater flows, proper[y owners should Narticipate in the planiling and implementation of a* fucure basinwide etormwater manaKement :+ystem. The following "Condition of Approval" shall hP required: That the owner(b) ur successur(g) in interest agree to join in any County approved Storaiwatec hianagemeiit NroKram and [o pay such rates and i'harKes as maY he fixe,i through public lieari.rigs for service ur net»Fic obtained by the pldnning, design, con- 5truct inK , mainCaiiiing, or upecat ion ot aturinwater eontrol faci li ties. t!i l/4 ' r- SPQ~+IE COUNTY ENYIRONMENTAL QRE1INANCE (WAC 191-11-970) Sect#on'11.10.230(3) Determination of Non-5ignificance (DNS) D E T E R'N iN AT 1 0 N OF H Q M- SI G N IF IC A~N C E- "`D N S" FILE NUMBERM: IE-52-85, h4tJLTIPLE FJ4MILY 5UBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTl1RED NOME PROPONENT: RICHAR,D MASON - (509) 535-1410 DESCRIPT~ON DF PRQPOSAL: Prvposed rezvne af approxirnatel,y 5.1 Acres from Multipl e Fami 1y Subu rban to Residentia7 Manufactured Home for the purpose of estab1 ishing a 33-Uflit Manufactur,ed Home Park. LOCATIQN of propasal, including street address, if ary: Cenerally located west of and adjacent to Flora Raad, approximately 500 ieet south of Sprague Avenue in Section 24-25-44. , LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COi9NTY Pl.ANNING D~PARTi++EAT ~ DETERMINATION: The lead.agenc,y far this praposal has determined that it dves not have a p robabl e si gni f i cant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was rnade after review af acom 1eted envi ra~tmental checkli st and uther infor~ati or~ -a~n fi le wi th the ~ead agency. Thi s i nfvrmati on i s avarilab1 e to the publ i c on request. RESPQNSIBLE OFFICIAL: STEVE P. NOROBIOWSKI Posi tian/Titi e- 5pokane County Zoni ng Admi nistrat.ar Phane -(509 )456-2205 Address - Spokane Caunty P1 anni ng Department North 721 Jeffersora 5treet, Spokane, WA 99260 aATE I5SUED: June 14, 1985 SIGNATURE: ~ Thi s 'DNS' i s issued undbr 197-1 1-340(2); the lead agency wi] l nat act on thi s proposal for fifteen (15) days fr~om the hte. i ssue~d -(see above CONWlEC~~S MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THA.N JULY 2, 1985 by 5:00 P.M. ~~~~~~####f###################I################################################ APPEAL Df Thi s Determi nati on may be made to the SPOKAbiE COUNTY PLANHING DEPARTKENT, Nvrth 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99260. Thi s appeal deadli ne i s the sarne as the above propvsal appeal deadli ne, bei ng ten (10) calendar days af ter the si gning af the Fi ndings and Drder. Thi s appeal must be wri tten and must be prepared pursuant speeific criteria on offricial appeal fonns. Contact the abave Responsi ble Off i c3 a1 ta assi st yvu with the speci fic ~ for a SEPA appeal. . Thi s"DNS" Form wars mai 1 ed to agenci es and departments as noted bel aw. 1. WA State Depart,nent of Ecology ( Olympi a ) 2. WA 5tate Department af Ecology (Spokane) 3. WA 5tate Dept. of Social and Heal th 5erviees . 4, Spokane County Health Di strict 5. 5chav1 Distri ct -Central Val1ey #356 . G. Fi re District # I - 7. Water District - Cansol3dated Irrigation District 8, Spvkane Gaunty Ai r Pol1 ution Cantral Authari ty ~ 9. ' 2084 Water Quality s , I I Z E 5 2 8 5 ENVIRONMENTAL . . . _ SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230(1) r BPOIUl1H BNVIRON![ENTAL OADINANCE (MAC 197-12-960) Section 11.10.130(1) Environmencel Checkliet , . Ff le No. ~ .25 Purpose of Checklist.s( I,, . I ; y•' ~ ;:r;, . . . The Stete Envirocuental Policy Act (SBPA) chepcer 43.21C RGW, requireo all govermentel agencies to coneider the eovironmental impecte of e propoael before eaking deeislono. An Environmentel Iopaet S[steoent (EIS) mus[ be prepared for all propoeals vlth probable eigniflunt edverse lmpecte on the Quality of the envicoctsent. The purpoae of tAis checkllet !e to provide informeclon to help you and the agency ideotify impacte froo your propoeal (end to seduce or avold lapeet• froo the propoesl, !f it can be done) end to help the agency decide vhether eo EIS !e required. Instructions foc Applicen[e: This environmental checkllot aeka you to descrlbe saue Dno1c inforsation ebout your propoeal. Goverrtmentel agencies use thie checkliet to decernlne vhether the environmental lopact• of youc proposal are oignificent, requiring preparatlon of an EIS. Anever the queetione brlefly, vith the most precise inforsatioe knovn, or give the Deet descrip[!on you cen. You euet anever each questfon eccuratelq and cerefully, to the eeet of your kn a+ledge. In eoet casee, you should be able to enever the Queetions from your ovn obeervationa or project plane vithout ihe need to hire e:perts. If yw really do not knov the ensver, or if a queetion doee not applp to yout pcopoool. vrite "do not knov" or 'dces pot apply," Camplete ansvero to the queetione nov mey ovoid unneceseary delays leter, , Sone queotione aek about goverosencel reguletions. such ae soning. ehoreline. eod landaark deeignatione. Anerrer theee Queecione 1f you can. If you hrve probleos, the governnentel agenciee ean eeeiat you. The checkliet questione epply to a11 parta of your proposal. evea 1f you plan to do them over e period of [ime or an different purcele of lend. Attech any additional infocmation that vill deocrlDe your proposal or !ts environaientel effecte. The agency to vhich you eubmit thie checkliet mep aok you to esplein your anovera or provide additio ml informetion reasom bly related to determining if there may be eignificaat adveree Sopact. Uoe of checklist for nonproject propoaals: Camplete this ehecklist for nonproject proposela, even though Queatlona may De ansvered "docs not apply". I!! ADDIiION. cmplete tha SUPPLDMNTAL SHEST P08 NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). For nonpro,yect aetiona, tha refe n oce• in the checklirc to [he vorde 'projeet.' "epplicant," and "proper[y or •!te" ehould De reed ee "proposal," "propoeer," aed `affected geographic •ree.' reepectively. ' A. BACKGROUND 1. Nnne of pcoposed project. if appllcaDle: Meadowbrook Mobi 1 e Home Village ~ . . ~ . ' . . ~ . , 1 . . t ~ ~ • -~k,. . . . ~ ~ ~ p ; • ♦ . ~ z. Hom of APpl:c.ot: P.i chard L. Mason 3. Addre...na peo~ number of appliunt ar caata~t peroon: Richard L. Mason, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202 4, a« checklis[ prepared: Apri 1 30, 1985 s. ~enc, reaue.~~~ checkliot: Spokane Count.v P1 anni nq 6. Propoaed, ti.Ing oT,.cbedul.'(inii,~ing4phaeina; it*:pprij.bI.)t.o'Project to- be.constructed i n three or 1 ess phases beginning in fall of 1985. 7, a. Do you have any plaas foc fu[ure addltlons, e:peneion. or furtAer activity related to or connected vith chle propoeelt If yee. explain. No . . . f . . , . • . . . . , : . : . . , . . . ~ ; - . - . b. Do yau ova or Aave optioni oa lend nearby or ndjacent.to this proposalt If yes, exylala. N 0 8. Liet •ny anviroaaental info nation you knov about tha[ has been prepered. or vill be prepered, directly related to thie propoeal. Environmental check list prepared for previous zoninq action (ZE-28-79) on subject property Ndi ~ . e ~ _ .~...!~_~:1G~e~~1.~.~_z.✓'~~?~+-^ , . , - "NWVMt.rc _ _ _ . ~ _--.a- I . ~ - 6POKANB ENVIRONlENTAL 0&DINANCE (YAC 191-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) A. BACKCROUND (contimred) 9. Do you knov vfiether ~ppllcat~q ~ are pending for governnental approvelo of other propoeala directly effecting the property covered by your propoself If yea, explaln. n 10. List any governnent approvale or permita tAat vill be needed for your propoeal, if knovn. Spokane Count,y Zone change-; approval of sewer and water svstems hv Snnkanp f_nUnt,r, Cansolidated irri.gati.on Distri;t and tbe State of Washinaton; bLii 1di nc,~permi t from Spokane County,,approval of s i te lavout and roads bv Snokane Count,X.Ej1gi neers and nl anni no . . _ - _ . . 11. CSve Dr1ef. camplete descrip[lon of your propoeal, including the proposed uees and the efse of the project end eice. 'Riere ere eeveral questione leter 1n th!• checkliat that aok you to deocribe certain aepecte of yout proposal. You do not need to repeat those anevere on thia pege. ~ Pro,iect will be mQbil hame rental park consistin9 of apnroximatelyrental spaces on 48 _acres . Park wi 11 be ser.yed b,jLpubl ~ csewerage and water faci 1 i ti es . Park wi 11 be constructeci to sl:andards established bv Saokane Countv. .'S. . . ~ . . . , ' ~ ~ . 12. Location of the proposel. Clve ouffic'ieot lnfornatloa to a person to underotand the precise location of your propoeed project. including e •treet addreoo, if any. and section, tovnship aad range. !f knovn. If a proposal vould occur over a range of aree. provide the range or bouadaries of the oite (s). Provide s legal descriptioa. site plaa, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reaeonebly .veilable. Yhile you should •ubolt any plane required Dy the agency, you are noe Yequlred to dupl:i'cete'eaps 6r detailed plans eubmitted vlth eny permit applfcetion rela[ed [o thla c!►ec1~11vt. , ~ _ . , . Project is located on ap,proximatelv 4,,9 acres on a portion of the E4 of NE I of Sec. 24, TWN 25N, R44 EWM; between Flora Road and StAen Roads, and south of Ziegler Bldg. Center in the Saokane Vallev, WashinQton. 13. Doe• the proposed actioa lie vitAia the Aquifer Seditive Area (ASA)t 'Ihe General Serer Service Areat Ihe Priority SeMer Service Area7 'Ihe City of Spokanef (Sees Spolune County'• ASA Overlay tone Atlaa for Oouadarles). The project lies within the ASA and the PSSA. ~C.,Sgk ?O EE COMYLEIBD bY APPLICANT 0. ENVIQOliHY.NTAL BLElENTS Evaluetion Yor Agency Use Only 1. EARTH e. Geaeral desctiption of the eite (circle one): Plat rolling. Ailly, steep slopeo, mountainous, oehere b. Yhat !o the •teepest •lope on the •ite (approxi"te percent slope)1--I ~ c. Mhat geaeral type• of soils are Iound on the •1te (for exaaple. clay. sand. Qravel. pest. ouclc)1 If you tnow the clsssifica[!oa of aQricultutal soils, specify thev and note sny priae farmland. Garrison Gravely Loam (GqA) d. Are there •urfece lodicatiooa or hlstory of unitable so11• !o the immediste vicinityT If go, descriDe. • ~ \ . . • SPOI(ANE ENV1ROt0NENTAL ORDINANCE (MAC 197-11-960) Sectlon 11.10.230(1) S. ENVIROPiP(ENTAL ELHMENTS(concinued) Evaluation Por Agency Uee Only e. DeocriDe the purpoee, type, rnd opproximace Quancitlee of any f1111ng or greding propoaed. Indicute oource of fill. Onlv minor vradina will be requ.jred to constsuct streets and utilities. No fill will be required. f. Could erosion occur ee a result of clearing, conetruction, or uae4 If •o, generally deecrlbe. No g. About vhat percent of the site will De covered with impervious surfaces efter project conetruc- ' -fion (f(ir exemple, aephalt or bulldings)Y Approximatel,y 40°6 , , . . . . ~ . • . . . , . . . . . , . _ . . ~ . h. Pcoposed ■easures to reduce or control eroeion, or other impacto to the earth. if any: Streets will have hard paved qutter lines. Drainaqe di saosal areas wi l l be arass turf . Y.-0 ^d areas wi l l be Qrass or landscape. 2. AIA I . e. bhec type of emleslono to the air vould re4ult from the proposal (i.e., duec, autamobile, odora induetriel, vood •soke) duriog conetruetion and vhen the prosect !o completedY If any. • generelly deecrlDe ead give epproximete quantites if knovn. ~ Conttruction activities will create dusttemporarilv. Finished pro,ject will result in increased automobile • emission in the immediate area. b. Are tRere eny off-oite •ourcea of emieaioaa or odor chat may effect your propooall If so. _ generallq deecribe. " Emission from heavy automobile traffic on Sprague Ave. mav have minor effect on Qroject site. ~ t„ , • , ,••t. , ~ . . • . ~ , ~ . C. Propooed sessures to reduce or contcol aais@loas or other lapact• to sir, if any: ' None 3. wATER a. Sucface: (1) Is CRere any •urface vater bodq oe oc in the imnediate vicinity of the site ineluding year- rouod and •earocul atceass. saltrater, lakes. pondo. vetlanda)t If yes. deacriDe type end provide oames. If appropriate, stete vhat •treaa or river it flow into. No (2) Yill the project requlre any vork over. in. or adjacent to-(0 chin 200 fee[) the described vateraf Ii yes, please describe aad attaeh avnilaDle plens. N ~ SPOKANE PNVIRONNEN'fAL ORDINANCE (WAC 191-I1-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIROMtENTAL ELBNENTS (contlnueE) . • Evaluation For Agency Uae Only (3) Eetloete [he amount oi fill end dredge meterlel that vou2d be placed 1n or removed from the surface water or vetlands end indicace the orea of che eite that vould be effected. Indicate the source of fill material. ~illllf' • (4) W111 the proposal require surface water vlthdrovals or dlverelone? Clve general descrlp- cion, purpose, and approximete quantfcies 1f knovn. None - . . , ~ - . (S) Doee the propocal lie vithin a 100-year flood pleint If so, note loceCion on the eite plen. No (6) DoeB the propoeal involve aey diecherge• of vaece meteriele Co eurfece vatere7 If eo, deecilbe;the type of veste and anticipated volume of diecharge. No b. CROUND: (1) W111 ground water be vltAdravn, or vill water be diecherged to ground vacert Cive general description, purpoee, end approximate Quentitiee !f krtown. - StormLwatet^ disposal will~ be via arasc retent,jnn arpac ~ - and drywells . . . . (2) kDescribe vaote meterlal thet v111 De dieeharged fnco the ground from septic tenka or other eaAitarq vaste Lreatseat feellitp. Dtecribe the general aise of the eyecem, the number of houoea to Ec oervad (!f epplicable) or the number of pereone the eqetem(s) are expeeted to serve. Project wi 1] be served by sewaae col l pcti' nn s~vc~t„em wh,j.cL_ will discharge to the Spokane-Valley Sewer interceQtor. ' . . , , (3) Deacribe any •yeteme, other then those deslgned for the diaposel of eenicery vaete, ~ inetelled for the purpose of diecherging f2uida below the ground aurface (1nc]udes syetems'such ae thoee fot the dioposal of otorm water or drainege from floor dralne). Describe the type of oystem, theaeount of materlal to be dleposed of through the eyatem end the typeo of materialo likely to be dispoeed of (1acludinQ materlals vhich aay enter the tyetem lrtndvertently through U ~ . ^ sp111s or as a result of fire flghting activitiee). zo~ ~j None (4) Yi1L any cAeaicale (especially organlc •olvents or petroleua fuele) be etored in nbove . ground or uadergrouod storage tankot If ro. what [ype• end Quantitlee of oateriela will be atoredt. No ~ SPOKANE ENVIRON![BNTAL 0&DINANCE (NAC 197-11-460) Seccion 11.10.230(]) 0. ENVIROtMENTl1L E1.6lSENTS (coacinued) Evaluatlon For Agency Use Only (S) Vhat protectlve •easure• vill be taken to insure that leako or •pills of any cheinleals storeE or uoed on •ice vi12 not be allowed to percolate to grouod water (thio includes measures to keep chesicals out of dispoeal systess described 1n 3b(2) and 3b(3)1 -K/A w~ /4S/4 /lQ c. Water Runof'f (includlrtg otorm vater)i ~ (1) Describe tRe source of ruooff (including •toc9 vater) •nd method ot collection and dispasal if any (iaclude quanticies, if k` ) Yhece 111 this. er floar7 1 thla te; flor into other wtersY If so, deocribe. ~~orm w~~er wi ri be Colie[t A in stre t _gutter 1 i nes and/or qrass drai naqe swal es and seeQ throitgh root stones or i nto drywel l s i n accordance wi th the adopted '208' regulations. (2) Nill any chanical• De •cored, handled or used oa the oite in a locetion vAere a •pill or leek vill drain to aurfece or ground water or to as[orn vocer diaposal •ysteo diocharging co surface or ground ratert (3) Could vaote aaterlals enter groutbd or surface wsters4 If so, geaerally describe. No . . . . . . - • - , ~ . . . . • . . ; • ' : ~ _ . ? . ~ . . . . . " _ d. Proposed meesures to reduce or control •urface. graund, and runoff water irpacts. ii any (!f • 'the proposed action lie• vitAia [he Aquifer 6ensitive Araa be especially elear on eYplaoation$ ralating yto tacilitias coaeereing Sections 3D(4). 36(3), and 9c(2) of tAia eheekliat). Compliance with adopted '208' stormwater disposal auidelines. . . . .y 4. PLANTS a. ffieck or clrcle type of vegetatioo found on the sites deciduovs trses alder. maple, aopeo. other. everQreee tree: flr, cedar, pie►e, other. •druDs. grass. pasture. , erop or grain.. . , vet •oil plaets, cattail, Auttereup. bullrvsh, •kunk caDQage, otber. vater plants: water lilly, eelQrass. •ilfoil. othar. otMr typa• of vegetation. ~ b. Mhat kind aad uouot of vegetatioo vill De rhoved or alter*dt When roject is complete# nearly all existinq veqitation wi e removed. c. Llst thzeatened or eadangered •peeiss knova to be oe or au r tha site. N o n~ d. Proposed ludscapias, w of aatiw 1 ots. o har ~e~~ res tp prsserve or enhanca vegetation on th. .it., Ic aayr Grass aAd smal~` shrus t n.yard areas . Landscapinq and qrass in public road setback. - . ~ " SPOKANE ENVIRONlMW'UL OitDItiAlfCE (1IAC 191-11-960) Ssccion 11.10.230(1) . S. JiNYI1t0lMTAL zI,DUUITS (eontlnuad) Evalwtion Por 5. AN LMALS /geecy Use Only 6. Circle any blyd• oad animal• vhicA have beeo oboerved oa or aear the sit• or are knovn to be on or near the •ltez birds: havk. heroo, eagle. itonQbitds, other: Non e maasals: deer. besr, elk. beaver, otherr N0 n e fisA: basa, salmoa, trout. herring. •hellflsh, others N o n e others . b. List any tAreataned or eadanseced specie• knova to be on or near the site. None c. Ia the alte aart of a ■lgratioo routef If •o. explain. NQ d. Pcoposed aeasures to preservo or eahaace vlldlife. !f any: No n e 6. ENEaCY AHD HATUitAL RESOtBCE6 a. Yhat kiad• of eoergy (eleetric, oatural gaa. vood stovc. •olar) vill be used to oeet the the completed pro}ect's enerQy necds! Describe vhether it vill be w ed for heat2ng, maaufac- turia=, ete. Electric ener4y wi11 provide most reauir m nts_ ~amP wood stoves may be used for heatinq t! D. Hould youc yro)ect effect the potentlal we of •olar eoergq Dy adjacent propertiest If •o, generally describe. . . c. Hhat tinds of eosrgy eonservation features ase lacludrQ in the plaas of this proposalt List othet proposad aeasures to redvice or control energy lapaets. !f anys . None - . 7. LNVIftOlMNTAL liLALTfi a. Are tM re any oaviromeotal hea2th 6asorda,•including ezaosure to tozic chmicals, rist of fire snd e:plwioa, *pill, or Aacardou• vaate, that could occur u• tesult of this proposalt If no, descriDe. None (1) DesesiDe apecial emerteacy service• that ■ight pe required. Unknown ~ (uAC 197-I1-9b0) Seccton 11•.1U.130(1) B. BNVIRONMENTAL ELE!(ENTS (continued) Eveluution Fb r Agency Uae Only ENVIRONMENTAL HE/►LTH (2) Proposed seaeures to reduce or control environmen[el heelth heaerde, if any: None b. Noise: (1) What [ypee of nolse exiet 1n the area vhich mey effece your project (for example: traffic, equipmen[. operatlon, other? Traffic noise from adjacent public streets (2) Hhat types and„lev,ele of noise vould be creeted by or essociaced vith the project on a short-term or e long-[ecm basio (for esample: traffic, constructioo. opera[lon. othert Indicate • vAei;.Houre ooise rould come from the e1te. Noi se from constructi on Pau i omPnt i.~^i na c'nnctrtiCt i nn phase (regular working hours). Usual noise associated with residential living areas. (3) Propoeed meeeure to reduce or control noiae impacte, if any: N orie B. L.AND AND SHORELINE USE e. WAet is [he current uee of the site end adjecent propecties? Site i$ eurrentl v vacant. Ad'acent ro ert South East is residential. AdJacent prope~/ - or es is L. • ig~it industrial or of~ice. b. fTea the site been used for agrlcul[ure f oo, descri No c. Deecribe any stcuccurea on the eite. None . . . . . . , . . . d, M112 any structuree be deaoliahedt If eo, vhich? No e. Ifiat !o the current soning claeslficetlon of the elte? mul ti fami 1 v suburban - (MFS) ~ ~ f. Yhat-i• the eurrent campreheneive plan designe[ion of the •itat Suburban t2ti6l "co2U~5 au.~- g. If epplicable, whet is the curreat ahoreliae maeter program desiQnatioa of the oiteT ~ A.4 N/a tz h. Has aaq psrt of the site been claeeifled ee an "Onvironmentally senaitive" ereel If so. apecity. V ~V No , L. Appro:iwtely hoa oany peopie vould reside or vork 1n che completed projectf 1ll1J . ~ 6POKAN6 ENVIHOlJ?ENTAL ORDINAtJCE (YAC 197-11-960) Sectfon 11.10.230(1) E. ENVIRON!@NTAL E1ZlEIiTS (contiaued) Evaluation for Atency Use Only J. Approxlmetely hov many people vould the comple[ed project dleplecei No n e k. Proposed,oeeouree to avoid or reduce dieplscement impacts. if any: 1\/A 1. Proposed aeesurea to eneure the propooel !o compatible vi[h exia[ing and projected lend uses aod plane, if tay: ` Proi ct- it lnroi _al _ _rancitinn frnm 1 iclht inrillstl^1al an - - office to residential 9. HOUSINC Approsiaately,hov many unit• vould Ee provlded, if any1 Indicatn vhether high. oiddle, or lov-lncoma_houaing. - - - - - - - - - - .0 "qd 11Ying units. Low ta middle income. 2 b. Approx$Rately hov many units, if any. would De elimina[edt Indicate whether hijh, oiddle.or lov-Saceme houeing. ' . None c. Proposed meaouree to reduce or control housIag lmpacto. if any: -Nnt1P io. AesmeTics What is the talleot height of aay propoeed •tructure (s), not lacluding entennas; vhat ie the principal exterlor building oe[erial(o) proposedT _ 20 feet : Meta 1 or wood s i d i ng - c~vc~.~eP b~ zv ~ b. irhat view in the lamediate vicinity vould be •ltered oc oDetructedT ~ None c. Propoeed eeaeures.to reduce or control eeethetic impacta, if any: , None 11. LICHT AND G1.ARE I a. What type of light or glare vill the proposal produceT Nhac tiae of day +rould it asialy occur? ' Interior streets will be lighted at night. ; b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hacard or interfere vith vievsY No , c. Hlut existina off-site •ources of llght or glare yy affect yaur proposalt Yard li tina from ad_jacent liaht industrial usef d. Froposed seasurea to reduce or control Light and glare lmpacts, if eny: None ~ . • lPOKANS 6NVIRONNENTAL ORDINANCE (VAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) 8. LNVIflOlA1E?RAL 6LZriE?ITS (cootlnued) Evaluetion For Agency Uoe Only 12. RECREATION What designated and irtforsal recreetionel opportunltie• are !n the 1Q0eEiately vicinity4 Greenacres Junior High Schnn1 b. iiould the proposed project dieplace any ezisting recreatlonel uaes7 If so. desczibt. No c. Proposed measure• to reduce or eontrol lmpac[o on recreation, including recreetion opportunities to De provlded by the project or applicaat. if eny: Nanp 13. HIS'f'O1tIC AHb CULTURAL PRESBRVATION 0. Art there anq places or obJects listed oa. or propoaed for national. •tate, or local preoerva- tion nglscer• knova to be on or neat to the •!te? If so. generally describe. No D. Cenerslly descriEe any lendmnrks or evldeace of hiotoric erchaeologicel, sclentific or culturel isportuice knove to be o0 or rtexc to the oite. .I~v11G c. Propored reasures [o reduce or contro2 impecto. if eny: 14. TRANSPOflTATION " - . a. Identify public strsets aod highvaqs serving the aite. end describe propoaed aeceee to the r esisting street systee. 6hov oo site.plaas, if aay. Project bounded by Steen Road on the west and Flora Road on ' the east. ~ SQraqg'e Ave. ''i s allroximata;ly 500 feet no--A.L of project. _ E. Is •ite currently setroed eq publie ttenei[t If not, vhat is the appro:imete distence to the naarest tranait stop4 Public transit routes exist on Spraoue Ave. adjacent to site. c. Hov uay parking spaces vould the completed projecc havet, How Uay,vould tAe project elimlmtet Two spaces per unit or approximatel.y 68 spaces. No parking spaces would be eliminated. d. Yill tbe proposal require any nev rwd@ or atreets, or lnprovereats to exietiog rwds or •treets oot 1ocluding drlvevaysl If •o, Qenerally describe (lcdicate vfiether publ2c or private). New interior streets (private) will be re4uired. Steen Road (pubi i c) wi1 l he upgrade hv navi nn yid an R,jE) e. Mill the pcoject we (or oeeur !o the ismediate vicinlty of) wter. rell. or air transportationt If so, generally describe. No 4 . . • . . 6POKANH ZNVIRONMENTAL OfiDINAlICE (WAC 19)-11-960) Seccioo 11.10.230(1) D. BNVIROtflIBNTAL ELEMENTS (con[leuad) Eveluetlon For Agency Use Only f. How maay vehicular trips per dey vould be genereted Dy the campleted project2 If knom . indicete vhen peek would occur. Approximately 270 trips per dav. Pedk will occur between . 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. each workinq dav g. Propoeed aeaeures [o reduce or control transportatlon lmpacts. 1f any: None . _ ~ . . - . . _ . ' , 15. PUBLIC SERVICES o. Would the project result in an locreased netd for public aervicea (for e:ample: Yire protection, police pro[ectlon, health care, schools, other)? If •o, geaerelly descriDe. , ( Pro1ect wi 11 pl ace i ncrPasPd dPmand nn f 11^enr..n.tpctl.nnz ` pol'ice protection, health care and schools. ,i ~I • b. Proposed seesures to reduce or control dirbct lapacte on publle aecvicee. if soy: • NnnP ~ 16. UTILITIES e. Clrcle utilities curre v~pllable at the site:~lectricit~ antural gar,(vatetJ refuoe , ~eervice3 ~Eelephon oani[ary eeve:Daep[ic aystem, other. ' ~ , . ~ b. DescriDe the ucilitie• thet ere propoaed for the project. tRe utility providing the service nnd tAe gen 1 co sCru tiop ac ivitie o the sit or in the i edi't viciaity vhich aight be need'ed.~~ elec~riciy. WI~1a, un~ergroun ~ Consolidate Irrigation Dist. 3) refuse, Valle.y Garbage. ~ ~ 4) telephone, PN6. 5) Sanitary Sewer, Spokane Count.v. ~ . ~ I C. SICNANAE - ' 1. the undersisned, sweer under che penaltq of perjury that the aDove reopocuee sre oade truthfully and to the best of my knovledge. I also , undeaetanA that. should there be any villful sisrepresentation or villful lsck of full discloeure on my part, the Igency_ may vlthdrav eny detecmlaation of c►onsignificance thet it aight looue in reliance upon th!• checklist. Dete: Apri 1 30 198 oponent Ri chard L.-Mason (Please Print or Type) / Proponent: Addrasst _-5. 25 A1 tamont ~ Phone: 535-1410 Spokane, WA 99202 Per.oo ccmPleting rorm: Ri chard L. Mason D.tE: ~ 1 30, 1985 Phone : 53 5 -1410 . . , . . _ ~ IOA STATT U8E ONLT Staff Membec(s) Itevleving Checklistf Baaed on tAl• •tat[ ceviev of the eovlrorueotal cheeklist and othes pertieent lnformatioa, tAe •caff: A4~9-10 Conclude@ [hat there are no probable slgniflcant odvesse lopacts and recommend• a dete nlna[1on of nonslgnlflcaete. B. Concludes that probable •ignlflcant adverse envlrornsntal lmpact• do exist for the current proposal and recontmends a oitigated deter- ■ination of nonsignificance vich coeditloni. C. Coneludes thet there are probible •lgni(1caet advers• onvlsoi+aaatal lmpaets and reeommends a determinatioa of •ignifieance. IILUFG T6E - =15.00 /Q - ~ , SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ' i ~ Date: Aori 1 30, 1965 Application No: ~ SZ'~ Name of Applicant: Richard L. Mason . 3 Street Address of Applicant: South 25 Altamont City: Spokane State: WA Zip Code: 99202 Tele. No. 535-1410 F2 4Name of Property Owner( s) : Lambert ~ Authorized Agent representing Owner (if other than owner) : Lambert , . 4 Existing Zoning Classification : Mul ti -fami 1y Suburban (MFS) t , Date Existing Zone Classification Established: May, 1979 Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Zone Classification: Residential Mobile Home (RP1h) ~x . Proposed Use of Property: Mobi 1 e Home Park :a• ~ Legal Oescription of Property: That portion of the E 112 of the N.E. 1/49 ,R r ~ Sec. 24, TWN 25N, RNG 44 EWM, Lyinq South of the (old) C.M., SP RR R/W; except ; - - the S 422 ft. and except Flora Rd. and Steen Rd., County of Spokane, State of . . Washington. fl" . ♦ . Section : 24 Townsh i p: 25 N Renge: 44 EWM a~ Source of Legal : Mr. Si 1 as Bates ~ w Assessor's Parcel No: (See tax statement) 24541-90$7 275 Steen Road ~ Property SiZe: 4•9 acres Frontage:_af§ Feet on: Flora Road . Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor:_Non ~ . Street Address of the Property: Unk, ~ , !f you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your ~ interest in it? Purchase Option ~ .hy Please list previous Planning Department actions involving this property: S~ d"O Zt: - 2$-71 C ~ . ~ ALL OF THE FOLLOwING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSwERED: ~ . ~ What are the changed conditions of the site area, which you feel rnake this ~ proposal warranted? Increas i nq need for mobi 1a. home rental soaces . " 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the. adjacent ' properties? Increased resi denti al traffi c , - ~ , ~ R zv . 2/3/81 . v• ♦ 1 1 V \ \r V 1 1 V 1 1 LI 4 LI 6.. ~"S T . F This section of the application will provide the Planning Departm~e~~'"s Staff with wyr,itten verification that the applicant has had preliminary consultation\ with the . ~ agencies identified. RLsults of the preliminary consuitation should be incorporat- ed in the pr6posal before final submittal to the Planning Department. ' • ~ ' . .X + 1. COUNTY ENGINEER`S OFFICE A preliminary consultation has been held to discuss the proposal. Our . *wAwt # re for submittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. . ~ ~ Si -natur (Date~) , . . ; g ~ 2. COUNTY UTILITIES OFFICE + , ' A iminar consultation has been held to discuss the p y proposal. Our ~ req ir ments for s bmittal of this proposal for rezone have been satisfied. ` j Th esi ated w er pu veyor, for this site is . • , ignat re (Da ' C/ 3. WATER PURVEY ~ / ( N AM E ) 6,ie~~41C14, ; - ~ , . _ . . ~a) The proposal (is not) located within the .boundary of our service a rea . • ' b) Satisfactory arrangements (have) ~havi__ne o~~ been madto serve this , proposal . ~ c) We are) (are not) able to serve this site with adequate water. F a , ~ 1 " T w . Signa~ture) (Date) , . . . . . _ . r r ~e + - '~4~, 6_UILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT ` Apreli.minary consu{tation has been held to distuss the proposal. Our ~ r-equirements fo.r' submittal of *this proposal for rezone 'have been satisfied. " This proposal i-s located in Fire District # . . . . . . . : " (Si1gn6ture) . (Date) - ~ r ; . , . '1 • , ' ` " 4 5. COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT • ' r . ' • ' , 'r A" rel.iminar consultation has been held to discuss the roposal. The apppcant has been informed of our requirements and standair-ds. - t'ti ' ' (Signature) (Date) . ~ . ; I, THE UNDERSIGNED, SWEAR UNDER THE PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MAQE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOW- ~ .j LEDGE. . . 1 FURTHER SWEAR THAT I AM THE OWNER OF REC(JRD OF THE SITE PRO- ' POSED FOR ZONE RECLAS51 FICATION, OR, I F NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM SAID OWNER - AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS OR HER gEHA i ~ • ' , , / s ( S i g n ed ) D a te : ( Add ress ) Phone : Z ip : _ . . . ~ ~ ~ NOTARY Y,`~~cct~ .c~ Date: NOTA;2 Y SEAL: SIGNAT F P LiCANT OR AGENT . ~ . . Date : ~ R ev . 21318 1 , Nuinbe r ZE 5 2-$(,_ S P O K A N E C 0 U N T Y E N G I N E E 8 ~ ---PRELIIrlI N ABY CUNSULTATION A. E'rojecC Name:_ PBOPOSAL Number uf Parcels: ' Section .2 y T. y,,5_N., R. ycl E.W.M.; Quarter 1 2 3 4¢ ~ kEVELOPER Naine : A 2d diQ.sQx) or Acldress: AGENT E'huiie : Business Home . , Naine : OWNER Ad d r e s s: ; Phone: Business Home Name : - BNGINBE8 Address : ~ Phone: Business Home ,A 4 ~ B. PRELIMINABY CONSULTATION: Date : By : STre-A,r ~ K.~. Preliminary a) Right-of-Way ~ Conditions b) Curb t/~ 5 ' c ) Sidewalk . d ) Pave . ~ e ) Approaches f ) Drainage , g) State/City Review Yes ( Ab Remarks• • Z- ~ C2R „ ~ . TQ ~ • , NOTE: This proposal must comply with Spokane County Regulatione for Qoade, Ap- - - proach and Drainage in New Construction; 8oard of County Commiseioners Reeolution ~ ~ No. 80-1592 as amended. Conditiona are preliminary and may change after field in- spection and review of County records. .a C. INSPBCTION Date: By: Remarks: ~ ~ D. SPECIFIC C4NDITIONS: Fee Paid : Yes No Amount $ Cash Check Plannins Arplication Signed: Date By: ~ E. FINAL PLAT CHECKS Fee Paid : Date Amotint Check Cash Mdthematit:al & Sucveyi.ng Checks: , No. 1 Ua t e Ky No. 2 Da t e tiy No. "I Ua t e- By Addit tonal mat hemaC ival anJ Sucveyi nK Checkb: No, 4 Date FSy hee Amt.bl)t.Nd.. Nf>. ._----Da Ce _B y._, Fee Amt. &i)t . Nd . ~ _ Nu. - - - _ _ - - - ---Dij t e. ~ h y k'e e Arn C . &Ot . I'd . _ No, ~ _ _ _ . ._i)a t e. - ISy _Fee /Vnt. & I)t . F'd . ] IKI ~ t ~ ~ 1 l ~ r 'v ` • ~ r^ y~& ' , ~ • ~ e • .,,r ~ , r ~ 4 ~ It~XI~~i~:~c :~~tt~Ni,~ i~i ~~u .-O An Inti-red Inn~wiL ~ - 18-3/,250 PAY TO THE ~ ORDER OF • 3~ ' y~ DOLIARS ~ • . Mliv i.GRBlYr1\ ~ - . . • RAINIER NATIONAL BANK , • . Sprapue and Havana • P.O. Box 3106 Spokane, Washington 99220 ~ F~,~me~~~,.z(c' ~rWe.~ - ~ 1T L 2 50000 3?1: 1121249003302110 f • , ~ . , ~ " •'r U5'" 334(o v itECE1PT Date 19 ~ t . i Received From_ivli4•+ld PACI(-~20 . ~'•vc°~ ~ 7 Address a t/ For ~ . . ~ i ~ • ~ . ~ ~ ACCOUNT FtOW p/11D , EFZ . 1 I1MT Of , ~ . y ACCOUNT CASH ~ 311 ar►T. vAIo CNECK f~ . N. 4.•~;,t ~i y~2tx~ ' ~ • . • y BAUNCE MC9Pi" i ~ DUE • . ~ . •ORD" , • ~ i 5~ • ~ ~ ~ Of . r ~ ~ 8K808 CPAAQ • . . , , - _ ~ ~ - , ~ , ~ ; , ~ . . • - . . : - A ~ , a • ~ ~ Inland , •a - Pacific : . 'ransrnI . . ~ ~o Engineering SoutA 25 Altamont Spokine. Washlnflton F~ h7v9 ' 509 535-1410 99202 , " - ' 1j J.~El - . 7 T0: s ,,O~e ' DATE: Fge. RE~p P ROJ E C T: AT T E N T I 0N:s,¢1 Gentlemnn: Wz are sending 04 en--lesed Ourder s2parate c( -;inI: Description - S2 - ~J _Y7 Blueline Prints Copy of Letter c Ori gi nal Drawi rg ; Cc- n;,ra j l"*?!1 ~5 ~ Work Authorizatinn / i Repnr` No. Copies 01ate Descr?ption ~ -Z& ~g S.yT l Dvc!~l ~~a 5 ~-~1~ AgV 5#r 34E -$2" 7AI~s Requested Actioi-i Information X' Review & Comrnznts / i :Ii ~ ~w ~ b;ri tten Apprcval Rna±ure P. t? eturr Rernark,s p • r ' ~S¢~ slrf= oZM . Sincerely, ~ I~ILAND F.I~CIF1C L' BY : v r _v . hib 1- f _ . . , *;0. TICOR TITIE1NSURANCE ~ . ' - ~icY o TitYe Insurance TICOR TiTLE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CAUFORNIA, a Cal,#omia corporat+on, here+n cai!ed the Company, for a valuaule consideration, and subject to the conditions and stipulations of this policy, does hereby insure the person or person, named in item 1 of Schedule A, together with the persons and corporations included in the detinition of "the insured" set forth in the conditions and stipuiations, aaUinst loss or damaae sustained by reason of 1. Title tothe estate, lien or interest defined in items 3 and 4 of Schedule A being vested, at the date hPreof, otherwise t'rian -as stated in item 2 of Schedule A; or 2. Any defect in, or lien or encumbrance on, said title existing at the date hereof, not shov, n i►► Sc`ied~:~p 03, or 3. Any defeci in the execution of any instrument shown in item 3 of Schedule A, or priority, at the da:z heteof, o~ver any succl ,nstrument, of any lien or encumbrance not shown in Schedule B; prov;ded, however, the Company shall not be liable for any loss, damage or expense resulting from the refusal of any person to enter into, or perform, any contract respecting the estate, lien or interest insured. 7he total liabiiity is limited to the amount shown in Schedute A, exclusive of costs incu-red by the Comoany as an incident ?o defense or settlement of claims hereund~r ~ TiCOR TITLE INSURANCE C01%1PANY OF C.4LIr~ r3N'A ~ ~ ~ B Y C.,,~).ahs . S t s Attest • ~ s ~~Cumr u~ ~ ~ ~ . . , i SCHEDULE A Policy Number . : C-172328, Ur.it 3 Date of Policy : July 10, 1985 at 8:00 a.m. Amount of Insurance : $100,000.00 Premium : $443.00 1. Name of Insured: Richard L. Mason and Nancy K. Mason, husband and wife. 2. Title to the estate, lien or interest insured by this policy is . vested in: Dan W. Lambert, a single man. 3. Estate, lien or interest insured: Fee simple estate. 4. Description of the Real Estate with respect to which this policy is issued: . _ - - _ - - - - - _ That portion of the East half of the Northeast quarter of the ! Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 25 North, Range 44 i East, W,M., in Spokane County, Washington, lying South of ~ Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad right of way; ~ ; Except the South 422 feet thereof; and ; d 6 Except Steen Road, and ~Except any portion thereof lying within Flora Road. ~ , ~ N - ~ ~ : . . VC58!1 • C-172328, Unit 3 ~ . - 2 - E ' Owner's Policy' _ t . SCHEDULE B DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBR.ANCES AND OTHER MATTERS AGAINST WHICH THE COMPANY DOES NOT INSURE: All matters set forth in paragraphs numbered 1 to 4, inclusive, in the inside cover sheet of this policy under the heading Schedule B General Exceptions. Special Exceptions: 1.. Last half general and weed taxes for 1985, in the respective sums of $596.80 and $.12(Assessor's Parcel No77 41-9087, Code 140) 2. The County Treasure 'o.rds reveal a preliminary assessment for Road Improvement District No. 353, in.the sum of (no amount available), which may result in a lien against said premises at a future date. Said preliminary assessment is not a lien as between buyer and seller and this notice is given for informa- tional purposes only. Reference to the office of the County Treasurer is made for further information. 3. Last half irrigation assessment of $51.09, by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19, for 1985., which will be delinquent October 31st, if unpaid.' 4. -Contract of Sale Vendor : Dan W. Lambert, a single man Vendee : Richard L. Mason and Nancy K. Mason, husband and wAife Dated : June 30, 1985 . Recorded : July 10, 1985 ' Auditor's No. : 8507100046 Receipt No. : 310095 I ; 5. For easements, restrictions, and other exceptions, see Schedule ~ "B-1" attached. - V~_58/lb F ' - - . • C-172328, Unit 3 4 • Owner's Policy , ~ ~ . SChedule "B-1" 1. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For ' : A perpetual right of way and easement to ' construct, reconstruct, operate and maintain an irrigation turnout and appurtenances. In Favor of : The United States of America, its successors and assigns : Recorded : October 15, 1964 Auditor's No. : 55738C Affects : The South 20 feet of the North 50 feet of the West 20 feet of the East 145 feet of the Northeast-quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24., 2. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : The right to erect, construct, reconstruct . and maintain an electric distribution line, together with the right to inspect said line and to remove brush and trees that may • interfere with the construction, maintenance . and operation of the same. Said easement covers the right to place 1 pole and 1 anchor on said property. In Favor of : The Washington Water*Power Company, a corpo- ration . Recorded : November 16, 1939 Auditor's No. : 413599A Affects : Said premises 3. An easement affecting the portion of said premises and for the purposes stated herein, and incidental purposes. For : A perpetual right of way and easement to construct, reconstruct, operate and maintain an irrigation turnout and appurtenances. In Favor of : The United States of America, its successors and assigns Recorded : October 15, 1964 Auditor's No. : 55739C Affects : The South 20 feet of the East 20 feet of the North 562 feet of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 24. ; • ' ° C-172328, Unit 3 , - 3 - 'Owner's Policy NOTE: 1. Said premises lie within the boundaries of Consolidated Irriga- tion District No. 19, and are subject to assessment by said district. For information contact: North 120 Greenacres Road Greenacres, Washington 99016 924-3655 (End of Schedule B) _ . vC 8 . • . . • A . Zoning Nearing Examiner Committee Actions of July 3, 1985 Ccontinued) . ~ ~ 3) ZW-28-85, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial: Hayden Location: Generally located east of and adjacent to Spotted Road, between 47th and 49tf► Avenues in Section 4-24-42. Proposal: Industrial Uses - CNo Site Plan). , Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) 4) PUDE-4-80/ZE-155-80, Extension of Time for Fi.nal Deyelopment Plan Submittal: ' Liberty Lake Villaqe, Ltd. Location: Generally located at the southeast corner of Sprague Avenue - and Liberty Lake Road in Section 22-25-45. Proposal: Planned Unit Development of 94 Detached Single Family Owellings. . Ext. of Time: Request Extension to May 1, 1987. ' Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 - 0) 5) ultiple Family Suburhan to Residential Manufactured Home: Mason ~ Location: Generally located west of and adjacent to Flora Road, approximate]y 500 feet south of Sprague Avenue in ° Section 24-25-44. ` Proposal: 33-Unit Manufactured Home Park Action: Approval. (Vote: 3 ' 0) } . Approval was granted for the zone reclassification to Resyden- . tial Manufactured Home zoning; however, a motion to restrict direct stall access to Flora Road and Steen Road failed (Vote: : ' 1 - 2). ~ If further information is desired, contact the Planning Department's office. . , 'Xi . ~ Y SPN:cmw . ~ ; . ;i i 4 ~ "i.. . ~ . e i - 2 - ~ c. . - . : . . ' . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Zoning Hearing Examiner Comnittee on J uly 3, 1985, and the members of the Committee present being Ron Odell, . Chairman, Kathleen M. Carstens and J erry Williams. , B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Richard Mason, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, File No. ZE-52-85, Multiple Family Suburban to Resi denti al Manufactured Home, for the purpose of devel opi ng a 33-Uni t Manufactured Home Park. C. F IND INGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, including manufactured home subdi vi si ons; comnerci al , sewer trunk 1 i ne and undeveloped open area. 2-: That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Suburban development. 3. That the exi sti ng zoni ng of the property descri bed i n the appl i cati on is Multiple Family Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with, and the Committee concurs with the Determination of Non-Significance. 5. That the proper 1 egal requi rements for adverti sement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the applicant has demonstrated that conditions have substanti al ly changed si nce the ori gi nal zoni ng of thi s area and accordingly, the proposed rezone is justified. . ' • ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 C. FINDINGS OF FACT (continued) 8. That the proposed use can be made compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed approval with reservations of the proposed use. , 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in - harmony wi th the general purpose and wi 11 not be otherwi se detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO TNIS APPROVAL ( Al l Condi ti ons i mposed by the Zoni ng Heari ng Exami ner Conini ttee shal l be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owner or owners of the property, hei rs, assi gns, and successors. ) l. That Planning Depa rtment Condition #10 be deleted and replaced as follows: "That fencing indicated on the site plan along the north and south property 1 i nes be i nstal 1 ed and be of a resi denti al natu re such as wood." 3. That a minimum 6-foot tall dense landscape screen be provided along Flora Road and Steen Road. The specific intent is to completely - screen the back yards of the stal l s from ad,joi-n-i ng vi ews. a) COUNTY PLAHNING DEPARTNENT 1. The Zoni ng Admi ni strator shal l approve a spec i f i c exteri or 1 i ghti ng pl an for the approved area pri or to i nstal l ati on of such lighting. (Such plan shall attempt to confine illumination to the area wi th ful 1 consi derati on to ad,j acent properti es 2. A spec i f i c 1 andscape pl an, pl anti ng schedul e and provi si ons f or maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project pri or to rel ease of bui 1 di ng permi ts. Landscapi ng shal l be installed and naintained such that sight distance at access poi nts i s not obscured or impai red. 2 ' . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 a) COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (continued) 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance wi thi n the concept presented to the Heari ng Exami ner Comnittee. Variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be pe nnitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All va riations must conf orm to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance: The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. That prior to release of building permits, the sponsor shall submit a final Manufactu red Home Pa rk design plan to the Planning Department which demonstrates compliance with the Resi denti al Manufactu red Nome Zone, Devel opment Standards of Section 4.05A.050-(b-1-9), and all Hearing Examiner Committee conditions of approval. 5. Al1 current standards of the Residential Manufactured Home Zone, • as amended, shall be complied with in the development of this s i te. 6. Appl i cant shal 1 comply wi th ' 208' recomnendati ons concerni ng stormwater runoff and provi de necessary 1 andscapi ng for runoff. 7. Any di vi si on of 1 and for the purpose of sal e, 1 ease or transf er, shall comply with RCW 58-17 and the Spokane County Platting - Ordi nances pri or to i ssuance of bui 1 di ng permi ts. 8. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to Chapter 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Spokane County Commissioners Resolution #77-1392 be initiated by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of final disposition of this appl icati on, and pri or to any on-si te improvements. 9. That landscaping as indicated on the submitted site plan be installed and maintained. 10. That fencing indicated on the site plan be installed and be of a residential natu re such as wood or slatted chain link. 11. That 8 to 10-foot tall trees be installed around the entire perimeter at a spaci ng of approximately 50-feet on center. 12. That the recreational vehicle storage area be screened f rom view of adj acent properti es and stal l s wi thi n the park. 13. That use of the recreational vehicle storage area is f or tenants of the Manufactured Home Park only. 3 . J ° • • . ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 • l b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ Prior To The Issuance Of A Building Permit: plicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Steen Road for right-of-way ri or to any use of the property. ~2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer. 3. Direct access to the abandoned Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railroad right of way from the proposal is prohibited. 4. Applicant shall improve Steen Road in a manner consistent with Spokane County TYPICAL roadway section No. 2 minimum paving width Access Standard. 5. Appl icant shal l subrnit for approval by the Spokane County Engi neer road, drai nage, and access pl ans pri or to the i ssuance of a building permit on the property. 6. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage sy stem plan and surface water disposal pl an for the entire project pri or to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permi t on the property. 7. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted - and approved by the Spokane County Engi neer -pri or to the issuance of a building permit on the property. The design, location, and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance wi th standard traffic engi neeri ng practices. Pavi ng or surfaci ng as approved by the County Engineer, will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 8. The word "applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property, hi s hei rs, assi gns, and successors. ~ To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant ay, wi th the approval of the County Engi neer, joi n i n and be a illing participant in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District .(RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not pa rticipate in the cost of these improvements. As an alternative metliod of constructing the road improvement tated herei n, the appl i cant may, wi th the approval of the ounty Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by Joi ni ng and partici pati ng i n a County Road Projec t(CRP ) to the extent of the required road improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. 4 ~ J • ♦ ' ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 b) COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (continued) 11. The construc tion of the road improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 12. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge ' Constructi on, and other appl i cabl e County standards and/or adopted resol uti ons pertai ni ng to Road Standards and Stormwater Management i n effect at-the date of constructi on, unl ess c- otherwi se approved by the County Engi neer, 13. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requi rements are found i n Spokane Board of County Commi ssioners' Resolution No. 80-1592 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. c) COUNTY UTILITIES DEPARTMENT 1. The owner(s) or Successor(s) i n i nterest agree to authori ze the County to pl ace thei r name(s) on a peti ti on for the formati on of a ULIO by petition method pursuant to RCW 36.94 which the petition includes the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest petition against the formation of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94 which includes the Owner(s) property. PROVIDED, this condition shall not prohibit the Owner(s) or Successor(s) from ~ objecti on to any assessment(s) on the property as a resul t of i mprovements cal l ed for i n conj uncti on wi th the formati on of a ULID by either petition or resolution method under RCW Chapter 36.94. 2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane . County, as amended. 3. Public sewers are to be provided and connection made to the Val 1 ey i nterceptor. Sewer desi gn to be approved by the County Utilities Director. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT l. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Heal th Di stri ct pri or to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permi t for thi s project. 2. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilitie s, Spokane County. 5 . . • • ' ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 I d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (continued) 3. A public sewer system will be made available for the project. Use of individual on-site sewage sy stems shall not be authorized. 4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by - the Regi onal Engi neer (Spokane), State Department of Social and Health Services. 6. Use of private wells and water sy stems is prohibited. e) COUNTY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT . 1. The si te i s 1 ocated i n Fi re Di strict # 1. 2. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Said numbers shall contrast with their background. 3. Trash enclosures shall not be located ad,jacent to combustible construction or underneath windows or nonprotected eaves. 4. Bui 1 di ng permi ts wi 11 be requi red for each structure. 5. Where it is desired to have access control gates in residential developments, the following shall apply:The minimum width of roadway, inside of access gate, shall be twelve (12) feet. There shall be at least two (2) such drive approaches where the gates are 1 ocated. One may be used for vehicles exiti ng. Ti re flatting spikes shall not be used unless the entrance is a minimum of twenty (20) feet wide. The gates shall be provided with an approved method of emergency operation in accordance wi th the fi re department standards. Where each dri ve approach is less than twenty (20) feet in width and controlled by gates, a seconda ry means of access shall be provided with a clear, twenty (20) foot unobstructed openi ng. 6. Fi re fl ow hydrant requi rements for thi s pl at are 500 gal l ons per mi nute for 30 mi nutes. Hydrants are to be spaced no further than 900 feet and such that structures fal l wi thi n a 450 foot radius of said hydrants. Plat sponsor to verify specific hydrant requi rements wi th Fi re Di strict # 1. The pl at dedication shall state: "required hydrants shall be installed pri or to the i ssuance of any bui 1 di ng permi ts or sal e of any 1 ots". . 6 . . • ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 f) WATER PURVEYOR l. Water Purveyor is Consolidated Irrigation District, and they wi 11 supply the si te wi th adequate water for domesti c, fi re and irrigation uses. g) COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 11. Air pollution regulations require that dust emissions during demol i ti on, excavati on .and constructi on projects be _control l ed. Thi s may requi re use of water sprays, tarps, spri nkl ers, or suspensi on of acti vi ty duri ng certai n weather condi ti ons. Haul roads should be treated and emissions from the transfer of earthen material must be controlled as well as emissions from all other construction related activities. 2. Measures must be taken to avoid the deposition of dirt and mud from unpaved surfaces onto paved surfaces. If tracking or spills occur on paved surfaces, measures must be taken immediately to clean these surfaces. 3. All travelled surfaces (ingress, egress, parking areas, access roads) must be paved and kept clean. 4. It has been determined that fireplaces and wood stoves are a significant source of suspended particulates. The small particl es lOmicrons) are respi rabl e and can have an adverse effect upon the health of the public. We strongly urge that if wood stoves/fireplaces are used, that burning be done as efficiently as possible. All wood should be seasoned and stored in a dry place. During periods of poor ventilation or elevated air pollution levels, we request that use of wood stoves and fireplaces be discontinued. 5. Some objectionable odors will likely result during the constructi on phase of the proj ect and from motor vehi cl es usi ng the site following completion of the project and f rom occupants of the proposed project. 6. All air pollution regulations must be met. 7 . . . A / ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N0. ZE-52-85 E. ORDER The Nearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Richard Mason, for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be APPROVED to the RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME ZONE. Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Williams Vote: Carstens - Aye Williams - Aye Odell - Aye Unanimous to APPROVE the Rezone per Specific Conditions to RESIDENTIAL MANUFACTURED HOME ZONE 3- 0) I Motion by: Odell Vote: Odell - Aye Carstens - Nay Williams - Nay To restrict direct stall access to Flora Road and Steen Road - (1 - 2; Motion Failed) - HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HER TO TNE ABOVE F INGS, ORD R. AND VOTE ~ ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Plan ing Directo ^ . STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator y~ Date: ~ -f/ , ' • ~ ~ • ~ • ' ~ - . . , . ~et s _ - ~ i34. Z . Za ~i to- . ~ • • •i• t ~ 1 AvrtA►'°►`• cq w ~ ~ • ~ ~ (Z ~ 5~' • • r ` ~ = . ~ ! ~ b 3[} ) , . .t"'1~ ~ • • ~c C,/ ~ 7~ ; • , . . 40 • . ~ ~ ^ V~ ~ ~ 1 tiy • D a ~ . ~y . ' ~ . t/- ~ • , • ,IF ~ • ~ • ` ~ ~ h • ► ; . : ~ ~ • . . 1 • ~ 1 • ' ~ ~ ► J• ~ ~ , ~ = ~r-"' ; ~ • ~ 1 ~ , . r r. • ' , ~ j , . . ~~1 1 ' , , . - j,~,, _ . ' C_~46 ; ~ . 1 . ~ . . • _ ` ,J • ~y/s'N~• Aw,l,~/t • Z . 71% iy - . ~ ~ ~ } ~ y a • -o.-e .f , ~ t-NZ S 7~K'°O~Sv~~~ ~,t`~`.S;r ~.ST~ 4 • ZZ! ~ ' ~ s. { ' i L.r'. . f ~ - ~ ~ ~ q~, ~ f~ • " ► ~ i • ~ ~ ~ • i . Z L3 f i.~ yi ~ A' I ~ ~ i~ ~ C • , b Z . ~ . . r. - ~ • - sl , ~~'V w► ~ . . . I qo ~ . ~ ~ • • 4 f • O ~ _ J ♦ , • + . . ' ~1N o F ^ R6 A.f.~ :~'~~'S~~ - N c , 1✓ y 9 ~ ,v ~ r . . . AR~ Pf' AP ~~t T ~ ~ ~~~g~. • ~ ~ :i: '.c%;;~ w~,~•~{1-nu~usno ~ kt~t ~ ~,,_,:at~ , ~,~,,Q ;n~i . t , • • a dv~ iVA G:°0seS' ' `f v~L~ ~•'-'t'r►. ati~i~ng ~ cu i ~ d , . ~ ► - sr {lI ~ ~~J - s ' y , ~ • . ' ° 'd tr~!~'" . _ , - . • ~ - ' - - Z_J -RI GHT OF WAY DEED - - - . , . I N- THE MA7"f ER o f STEEN ROAD No. 1890 KNOWN-ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that Richard L. r•iason and Ilancv K. lrason ~husbard&&rif:) and Dan W. Lambert la sinple nerso , of the.- County of Spokane, in the State of Washi ngton, i n consi deration of the benefi ts and other val uabl e consi derations, and. the sum of One and no/100 Dollars, paid them by the County of Spokane, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, have granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents do qrant, bargain, sell and convey unto said Spokane County, the following described qarcel of land, situated in Spokane County, in the State of 4lashinqton, to-wit: The East 5 feet of the West 25 feet of that portion of the East Half (E-~') of the Rortheast Quarter (bTE~_-) of the ITortheast Quarter (1IE;) of Section 24, lying S'outh of the former Chicago, plilwaukee and St. Paul Railroad right of way; EXCEtT the South 422 feet thEreof; Kh~D ALSG EKCEP'T ar~y portion thereof lying within Flora noad. of Section 24 , Township25 North, Ranae 44 , E.W.M. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, unto the said Spokane County for the purposes of a nublic road forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF_(,~e, have hereunto set o&17 hands and seal this-J137 day of_/~~ ~ . ~ 190. 4. . • . ~1y`.~!fCr N'JRCt'ii..}s'. tJ'::'y:X-~•jr.• . ~ ` f 7~~~..' ' ~ • ~ ~c!i~;c..• ~ . ._..M. . X AY Z ~ 32 ~s.~ K • _ - . X .%~~f'~~~ > ~~~~~-fi t. . . . . . . . R/W 1/1/85 . r ~1 • ~ . . r.~ . .~~'tio~,.;~:~►~.~ . V1( C C74 t'•~" ~ .