Loading...
2001, 06-12 Permit App: 01004591 Grading for Man Made PondProject Number: 01004591 Penalties wil Project Information: Permit Use: GRADING (2000 CU Y 1 OR MAN MADE POND Contact: SCHLEPP, KEN & STEPHANIE Address: 17215 E CATALDO AVE C - S - Z: GREENACRES, WA 99016 Setbacks: Front Left: Right: Rear: Phone: (509) 927-4342 Group Name: Site Information: Project Name: _. District: G Application THIS IS NOT A PERMIT essed for commencing work without a permit 141: 6/12/01 Page 1 of 2 J Plat Key: 000129 Name: BACON'S ADD TO GREENACRES Parcel Number: 55182.2330 Block: Lot: SiteAddress: 17215 E CATALDO AVE GREENACRES, PYA 99016 Location:: GRE Zoning: UR 3.5 Water District: Area: 83,000 Sq Ft Width: 0 Nbr of Bldgs: 1 Nbr of Dwellings: 1 Review Information: v Department Review BUILDING Site Plan Review Hold Reasons: Permit Conditions: Owner: Name: SCHLEPP, KEN & STEPHANIE Address: 17215 E CATALDO AVE GREENACRES, WA 99016 Hold: ❑ Depth: 0 Right Of Way (ft): 60 BUILDING Plan Review Hold Reasons: Permit Conditions: ' el BUILDING Hold Reasons: Permit Conditions: ENGINEER H^ ao cnsons- Permit Conditions: Permits: Released By: 11 4,94-7. Special Inspections ...SE-PA, , Approach / Drainage /W 5/4ch1 LU ' 1 /l/o✓ie ci -news_%sad yu/& Released By: 114?/G'! ) S>rmou -" .7 btf-t 1Fc e s Project Number: 01004591 1 1' Application Date: 6/12/01 Page 2 of 2 THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit Grading Permit Contractor: OWNER Film: OWNER Address: 0 000000, 00 000000 Phone: (000) 000-0000 This Application: Total Project: Description Grp Type Notes Sq Ft Valuation Sq Ft Valuation GRADING NONE NONE 2,000 $2,000.00 2,000 $2,000.00 Item Description PERMIT FEE REVIEW FEE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Totals: 2,000 $2,000.00 2,000 $2,000.00 Units Unit Desc Fee Amount 1 Y OR BLANK $89.00 1 Y OR BLANK $20.00 1 Y OR BLANK $75.00 Permit Total Fees: $184.00 Payment Summary: , Operator: DMD Printed By: GMW Print Date: 6/12/01 Permit Type Fee Amount Invoice Amount Amount Paid Amount Owing Grading Permit $184.00 $184.00 $75.00 $109.00 $184.00 $184.00 $75.00 $109.00 Notes• SPOK F COUNTY r PROJECT APPLICATION WORK SHEET SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT 1026 WEST BROAD\CIAY AVENUE SPOKANE, \VA 99260 509-477-3675 SPECIFIC SITE INFORMATION Street Address: i-701)5 E cat& l(,1 Assessor's Tax Parcel Number(s): s5' J g- 33� Legal Description: Project Description: ` O✓ACI, (Qat ❑ I3uilding Permit ❑ Change in Use AILGrading ❑ Dlanufacmred Home Permit ❑ Relocation ❑ Sign ❑ Tenant (Neve/Change) ❑ Other .Department: Use Only Phone: aga - 5-oci Fax ❑ Applicant: - Phone: AA/1/ -Q . Fax: Nlailing Address: T 1)inienmiuns \Car Denner Pune / ) _.• _.., / 7a / 5 L Ca 5 rDist et/P ,o�'. °` Road width ., - :+ Setback. thong _ Left: li • ` Rghe- ' Schord 1)111 t F c . �_ I ()strict:. r Zdn g OWNER/APPLICANT INFORMATION Indimte mho 3bould be mnlmved re, Ibu pnjei L"I )wrm r. ' e l/L a \ tp-c) Phone: aga - 5-oci Fax ❑ Applicant: - Phone: AA/1/ -Q . Fax: Nlailing Address: T 1)inienmiuns Mailing Address: 21a1 thus sq. ft. / 7a / 5 L Ca ► c10 Cilt', Stale, Zip (c er-e S w 14- 990/6 City, Slate. Zip Ileal source (electric. gas. etc.) ❑ Cuntmamr Phone Fax ❑ Archiicct/enginccr Phone p„, Nlailing address Mailing address City, slate Zip Cil., Sine rip a \\'A\ Sate Contactor ti tnsc = Coma name. , ty)-121:„...., PROTECT INFORMATION -'. Building Information' ..._.. - - building height to peak... # of stories illain floor so. It. Unfinished basement :hi. P. 1)inienmiuns Ti)1:11 habitable space 21a1 thus sq. ft. Finished bn>rmen1 sq. ft. Occupancy group Construction ape Garage sq. fl. DecIr sq. ft. Cost of project Ileal source (electric. gas. etc.) Manixfactured=FIome Sign Width: Length: What is the square footage of the sign face? 1 -low high is the sign? Year: Make: # of signs Area of existing signs Are there slopes greater than 30% on the property? (30 ft rise in 100 ft) ( /%) ❑ Yes 0 No Address 0 No ' : Is rhe property located within 1000 feet of a Natured Resource Area? ❑ Yes ❑No .. - Relocation.:,, Fire Safe Previous address Fire Sprinkler Paint booth Fire Alarm Tent Fireworks display Proposed use Special Inspections Required?;. Non -Residential Energy Code Coinphance7 .. . Firm Name What is the current use of this property? Phone Plans 1' a'niner Phone Inspectors: Are there any wetlands, streams or ponds within 200 feet of the property? If yes, idenli(y on she plan 0 Yes 0 No Is there evidence of fill or excavation on the property? 0 Yes 0 No Are there slopes greater than 30% on the property? (30 ft rise in 100 ft) ( /%) ❑ Yes 0 No Address 0 No ' : Is rhe property located within 1000 feet of a Natured Resource Area? ❑ Yes ❑No .. - Inspector Phone ❑ Concrete ❑ Welding ❑ Bolting ❑ Reinforcement Addmss ADDITIONAL SITE INFORMATION Are there structures on the property? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, identity, on file plan What is the current property size? (square feet or acres) Is any part of the property within 250 feet of a shoreline? I(yes, idem/O, on she pian ❑ Yes ❑ No What is the current use of this property? Is your property in a designated wildlife habitat area? 0 Don't know 0 Yes 0 No ' Will the site be served by a septic system? ❑ Yes 0 No Is any part of the property within a 100 yr flood plain? IJ_yet, idem[, on site plan 0 Maybe 0 Don't know 0 Yes 0 No Are or will there he wells located on the property? I/jec iden//fy on the the plan 0 Yes 0 No Are there any wetlands, streams or ponds within 200 feet of the property? If yes, idenli(y on she plan 0 Yes 0 No Is there evidence of fill or excavation on the property? 0 Yes 0 No Are there slopes greater than 30% on the property? (30 ft rise in 100 ft) ( /%) ❑ Yes 0 No Are critical or hazardous materials used or stored on site? 0 Yes 0 No DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Is the property in a designated Stormwater�Control Area? - -❑Yes. 0 N Is public sewer available io the site? 0 Yes - 0 No ' Isthe property inside the ASA? • —0 Yes I❑.Ycs 0 No hi- &';.Y. 15 public water available to the site? _.. 0 Yes 0 No - �. .. Is the property inside ihe. PSSA?'.' 0 lyes 0 No ' : Is rhe property located within 1000 feet of a Natured Resource Area? ❑ Yes ❑No .. - Dam Rvcdved: Staff Representative: METHOD OF PAYMENT VISA ❑ c:\sn ❑ dutch ❑ ❑ '"• ❑ DRONER FAXED PERMITS WILL ONLY BE ACEPTED WITH PAYMENT OF A MAJOR CREDIT CARD DA'1'I S: Ir:N '1ILIr:S: BANKC:ARD NUMBER: Aft 11 It)RIZlfD SIGN :ATURIt: SLI li 1( Yf:\1. TOTAL FEE- MINIMUM PERMIT FEE 15 $35.pl PLEASE MAKE 0 IECKS PAYANAt lO SPOKANE COUNTY PRR\Itr f.L\hill ' Mott Mage .. (b' cQ 0 0 1 Qoe. o se' s 9/ i • t TeI _ . - ..mss 2.5" r ti 'I 11 1 \J rsJ_4 r61,c, re 'A b QOHf /PVC. G N SingAri-- .3.es i T r /6 Ass /2 .lPS..� 20 • k ; B.LkiikY Rho .. • 2.5 Par\ otA ±L 55)8'ar X330 10 I Anti SPOKANE COUNTY :ro :lion and Contro Division of Building and Code Enforcement &19 This brochure is designed to help understand what erosion and sedimentation requirements you need to follow when applying for a building permit. When construction activities disturb land erosion and sedimentation can occur. New requirements and perfor- mance standards have been created to control soil erosion and sedimentation through the use of temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control practices. What is Erosion and Sediment Control? When elements such as running water, ice, or wind, continually batter the surface of the land erosion occurs. Sedimentation occurs when materials get deposited by flowing or standing water. The purpose and intent of the Erosion and Sedimenta- tion Control requirements is threefold: • To protect and prevent damage to Spokane County's stormwater management infrastructure. ■ To minimize the effects of land -disturbing activities, including: erosion, sedimentation, and the impact of increased runoff onto private property, public roads, right-of-ways, and bodies of water. • To protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public. Do I need to submit an Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan? The Erosion and Sedimentation Control requirements and provisions apply to land -disturbing activities that require a permit. A land -disturbing activity is one that results in a change in the existing soil cover (either vegetative or non -vegeta- tive) and/or the existing soil topography. Examples include demolition, construction, clearing, grading, filling, logging, and excavation. An Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan is required to be submitted to Spokane County with your permit appli- cation when you are planning a major land -disturbing activity. What is a major land -disturbing activity? Major land -disturbing activities are those activities that disturb an area equal to or greater than one acre, or create additional impervious surface area greater than or equal to 5,000 square feet. What if my major land -disturbing activity doesn't need a permit? All major land -disturbing activities that do not require a permit or approval by Spokane County are not required to have an Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan submitted. However, these activities are still required to meet the performance standards. The enforcement provisions will also apply to these activities. Property owners should realize that although a land -disturbing activity may not require a permit from Spokane County, a permit may be required from state and/or federal agencies. What is a minor land -disturbing activity? A land -disturbing activity is considered minor if less than one acre of land is disturbed, a single family residence or duplex is constructed, or less than 5,000 square feet of impervious surface area is created. These activities do not require the property owner to apply for a permit or submit an Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan. However, you are required to meet all performance standards and require- ments of Erosion and Sedimentation Control. When do I submit the Erosion and Sediment Control plan? The Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan will be submitted with the permit or land use application prior to any land -disturbing activities and must address the area of land to be disturbed. The permit applicant is responsible for ensuring that all requirements are addressed in the Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan. If your project requires an Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan, Spokane County can not issue you the permit unless your Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan is submitted. Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practices Erosion and Sedimentation Control best management practices are used to help property owners to meet require- ments. Examples of best management practices can be obtained from the Spokane County Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practices Manual, available at the Spokane County Public Works building. The best manage- ment practices manual provides property owners with examples that help meet erosion and sediment control. requirements. If you want to experiment with new techniques to control erosion and sedimentation, do so. However, the experimental management practices are required to meet the performance standards. What Performance Standards do I need to meet? By now you might be wondering what the performance standards are. Essentially, the performance standards are intended to provide a minimum threshold for controlling soil erosion and sedimentation caused by land -disturbing activities. Erosion and Sediment Control Performance Standards • Minimize tracking onto public, private, and future public roads • Protection of public roads and stormwater facilities • Proper washout of concrete trucks and equipment • Protection of private properties • Protection of bodies of water and wetlands 1. Minimize tracking onto public, private and future public roads: Tracking should be prevented from occurring using Erosion and Sediment Control best management practices, or a reasonable effort must be made to clean up the area if soil, dirt, mud, or debris is tracked onto public, private or future public roads. 2. Protection of public roads and stormwater facilities: Performance standards are not being met if more than 2 gallons per day of soil, dirt, mud, or debris is deposited, other than tracking, from the project site onto adjacent public roads and/or a stormwater system within a public right-of-way. 3. Proper washout of concrete trucks and equipment: Performance standards are not being met if there is observable evidence of concrete washout material within a drainage area, stormwater facility, body of water, or a proposed stormwater facility area. 4. Protection of private properties: Spokane County does not presently have the resources to enforce the provisions of this Ordinance for violations that affect private properties. Therefore, no performance standards have been established with regard to depositing soil, dirt, mud, or debris from a project site onto adjacent private property. However, private property owners may have the ability to seek judicial redress for such actions. 5. Protection of bodies of water and wetlands: Performance standards have not been met if there is deposition of soil, dirt, mud, or debris from the project site to adjacent bodies of water. What happens if I don't meet the performance standards? If your project does not meet the performance standards outlined in the Erosion and Sedimentation Control plan, a Notice of Non -Compliance will be issued to the permit applicant or property owner. The Notice of Non -Compli- ance will contain information on the location and descrip- tion of the construction project, a description of the non- compliance and the corrective action that needs to be taken within 24 hours, the amount of the penalty that will be imposed if corrective action is not taken, and information regarding the appeal process. Failure to stop the activity noted in the Notice of Non - Compliance or take corrective action can result in a fine of $1,000 a day for major land -disturbing activities or $250 a day for minor land -disturbing activities Each day of violation will be counted as a separate violation. Spokane County Public Works can only impose penalties on permit applicants if the project is related to public facilities. Violations related to private property are a civil matter and are not enforceable by Spokane County. If you have any further questions regarding the Erosion and Sediment'Control requirements please call 477-3604. If you have any questions regarding the permit process call 477-3675. For more information or an appointment contact: Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement Permit Center - 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0050 (509)477-3675 SPOKANE COUNTY PRINTING DEPT. (B19) MVO ME isk SroK,AiCou\TY 0 Pail* g Lot Rals Division of Building and Code Enforcement 13-46 When are grading permits required? • For the construction of private roads not within an approved preliminary or final subdivision, binding site plan, etc., provided road and drain- age plans have been approved by the Division of Engineering and Roads. • Creating a new, or paving a previously unsurfaced, parking lot. • Grading, excavation or placement of fill exceeding 50 cubic yards on construction sites prior to issuance of a building permit. • Cut, fill or grading of any depth on any lot that obstructs a drainage course. • Grading road construction within a proposed subdivision prior to preliminary approval; or rp for to approval of road and drainage plans. • Fill more than 1 foot in depth placed on slopes greater than 1 vertical to 5 horizontal units that exceeds 50 cubic yards on any one lot (20% slope) when not part of a valid building permit. • Fill more than 3 feet in depth, that exceeds 50 cubic yards on any one lot, intended to support structures when not in conjunction with a valid building permit. • Excavations more than 2 feet in depth when not part of a valid building permit. • Excavations where a cut slope is created that is greater than 5 feet in height and steeper than 1 vertical to 1.5 horizontal units (66.7% slope). It is noted that even in the above instances, when "grading in an isolated, self contained area if there is no danger to private or public property" the require- ment for a grading permit may be waived by the Division of Building and Code Enforcement. This would not be applicable where grading activity is occurring in a Critical Area Buffer, such as adjacent to a wetland. All grading activity in these areas is subject to review—if in question, please don't hesistate to contact us. What information is required to obtain a permit? For parking lots and other grading activities, stormwater and drainage plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer will be necessary when required by the Division of Engineering. Plans for parking lots need to include details for barrier free spaces, typical parking space dimen- sions, travel ways, road approaches and landscaping as well as stormwater retention areas. The use of existing buildings on the site is also necessary to calculate parking requirements. Any fill or excavation of more than 500 cubic yards requires environmental review and an environ- mental checklist to be submitted as required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Addition- ally, any parking lot providing a cumulative number of spaces over 40, or construction of a private road serving more than 8 lots, would also require compliance with SEPA. The checklist is circulated to a number of local and state agencies for review. This process can take from 14 to 30 days and possibly longer depending on the impacts of the project. When less than 5,000 cubic yards of grading is involved: • General vicinity of the site. ■ Topography and/or elevations before and after. 0 • Location of buildings or structures. ■ Location of drainage courses. ■ Erosion and sediment control measures (see ESC Ordinance and Bulletin #B-19). • Drainage plans (when impacting drainage courses). ■ Soils / geotechnical reports (steep slopes and/or erodible soils). • Critical areas delineation when grading adjacent to a critical area such as a wetland, steep slope or riparian area. • Identification of where any soil removed from the site is going to be located. When more than 5,000 cubic yards of grading is involved: • Generally, these projects require plans prepared by a licensed civil engineer. See requirements for engineered grading of appendix section 3309 of 1997 UBC. • Erosion and sediment control measures (see ESC Ordinance and Bulletin #B-19). • Identification of where any soil removed from the site is going to be located. What is the cost? Fees are charged based on the number of cubic yards placed, moved, cut or removed in conjunction with the permit. For parking lots the total of yard- age materials to be placed on the site will be used to determine the permit cost (fill, gravel and asphalt). What other departments are involved? ■ Division of Engineering - Land Development Section ■ Division of Engineering - Flood Control • Division of Utilities - Stormwater Section The following agencies may also be involved if there is an impact to a critical area such as a wetland or riparian area or impact to a state highway. • Washington State Department of Natural Resources • Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife ■ Washington State Department of Ecology • Washington State Department of Transportation Are inspections required? Inspections of the grading, drainage, parking lot configuration and landscaping are required. Some aspects of the grading and drainage systems may require inspections by a civil engineer. In all cases inspections by the Division of Building and Code Enforcement are required upon completion. Miscellaneous Please note that exception from grading permit requirements does not relieve the property owner from compliance without other regulations. For more information or an appointment contact: Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement Permit Center - 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675 SPOKANE COUNTY PRINTING DEPT. )546) 02N0 DETERMINATION OF NON -SIGNIFICANCE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL, JAMES L. MANSON, DIRECTOR WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3) Spokane Environmental Ordinance PROJECT #: 01004591 PROPOSAL: GRADING (2000 CU YDS) FOR MAN MADE POND OWNER: SCHLEPP, KEN & STEPHANIE CONTACT: SCHLEPP, KEN & STEPHANIE 17215 E CATALDO AVE GREENACRES, WA 99016 SITE ADDRESS: 17215 E CATALDO AVE GENERAL LOCATION: PHONE: (509) 927-4342 PHONE: (509) 927-4342 LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT DETERMINATION: A review of existing development regulations, zoning, and typical recommendedconditions and • or mitigating measures indicates that the State Environmental Policy Act Determination will be a Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS). A final determination (wii4419e/was) made on '7 151 n ( , after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This is available to the public on request. aThis DNS is issued pursuant to WAC 197-11-355. There is no comment period for this DNS. REVIEW AUTHORITY: Jeff Forry SEPA Coordinator DDompier Project Coordinator James L. Manson, Director Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675 Date Issued: 7 (s fr, Signature. n(15_, APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County of Division of Building and Code Enforcement, 1st Floor, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA. 99260-0050. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make specific factual objections. NOTICE OF AIkICATION/DNS CIRCULATION LIST 'DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY - OLYMPIA o DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - SPOKANE ❑ DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE o WA STATE AVAITION (D.O.T) o DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES o FEDERAL AVIATION AUTHORITY o FEDERAL COMMUNICATION CENTER d FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 o WATER DISTRICT NO. o SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1 DIVISION OF CURRENT PLANNING -'JOHN PEDERSON /DIVISION OF LONG RANGE PLANNING - TIM LAWHEAD ❑ SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT SCAPA DIVISION OF ENGINEERING & ROADS - BECKY DUEBLER m' DIVISION OF UTILITIES - JIM RED/BRENDA SIMS o CITY OR TOWN a SPOKANE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT o FAIRCHILD AIRFORCE BASE a BONNIVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT' James L. Manson, C.B.O., Director A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Gary Oberg, Director TO: Agencies FROM: Jeffrey E. Forry, Senior Building Technicia DATE: June 28, 2001 RE: Enclosed DNS's Please disregard these documents as they were issued in error. Thank You. 1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0050 PHONE: (509) 477-3675 • FAX: (509) 477-4703 • TDD: (509) 477-7133 isiotice oI Application the Spokane County Division of Building and0le Enforcement (Review Authority) has publisl*his Notice of ,Application to provide the opportunity to comment on the, described proposal. Ile comment period ends 14 calendar days from the date issued. During this period written conuneuts m:n' he submitted to the Review Authority. 'lhe file may be examined between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Monday through friday (except holidays) at die Division of Building and Code Enforcement offices in the Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, Washington. Questions may he directed to the Project Coordinator listed below. PROJECT .7 : 01004591 OWNER: SCFJLEI'P, KEN & STEPHANIE CONTACT: SCHLEPP, KEN &S 1IPHANIE PI-IONE: (509) 927-4342 PHONE: (509) 927-4342 APPLICATION DATE: 12 -Jun -01 DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS: 06/12/01 SITE ADDRESS: 17215 E CATALDO AVE LOCATION: Section 18 Twn 25 Range 45 PARCEL K: 55182.2330 PROJECT: GRADING (2000 CU YDS) FOR MAN MADE POND ZONING: UR3.5 OTHER PERMITS: NA FURTHER STUDIES: NA ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Division of Building and Code Enforcement has reviewed the proposed project for probable adverse environmental impacts and expects to issue a determination of nonsignificance (DNS) for this project_ The optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355 is being used. This may be the only opportunity to comment on the environmental impacts of the proposed project. Any SEPA appeal is governed by the Spokane Environmental Ordinance and such appeal shall he filed within fourteen (14) days after the notice that the determination has been trade. EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS: WRITI EN COMMENTS: Agencies, vibes and the public arc encouraged to review and provide written comments on the proposed project and its probable environmental impacts. All comments received within 14 calendar days of the date issued below will be considered prior to making a decision on this application. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS: Spokane County Zoning Code, Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, Spokane County Standards for Roads arid Sewer Construction, Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management and the regulations of the Spokane Regional Health District arc the primary regulations applicable to the site. CONSISTANCY: In consideration of the above referenced development regulations and typical conditions and/or mitigating measures, the proposal is found to be consistent with the "type of land use", " level of development, "infrastructure", and "character of development'. PUBLIC HEARING: This action is not subject to a future public hearing. REVIEW AUTHORITY: Date Issued: Jeff Forry Project Coordinator James L. Manson, Director Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0050 (509)477-3675 (D-ai-ter Signature: Idea The comment period closes at 4:00 p.nt. on 'pt. a•F1:Y, • • Friday, Jun 15, 2001 11:36 AM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230[1] 0 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page I of 21 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST WAC 197-11-960 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1) PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts or your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON -PROTECT PROPOSALS: Complete this checklist for non -project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON -PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). For non -project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 2 of 21 A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: FILE/PRojEcr No. CA 013454I 2. Name of applicant: en .21depp 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: J `7 (215 t('ct7 YCID �re A a CseS (A -i 14- 990 s c-- Oso)-- SL/D Evevs.i v. S Scc-sa3-SiAe ` `1 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: -IcY'Cf'VRt-i to 13 1''......b • w.i 4. k �O"�- JN et) 62-2Z/AIf nYC 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): - I-aAQIVA" Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 3 of 21 • • A. BACKGROUND (continued): 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. At° b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. (� GR -4k-0 ttvCj 1�EClankliQz, I Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21 A. BACKGROUND (continued): 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. we, L ,aj�,/p,b2 a�,S 09 F 4d- c A ci- C� -ts u�inu&Q IvocJ la t t��occ/j , we G4.calc,--hili p„ (Sw:1- am /1S 9vs/�r✓!� S caws ✓P aIM^v! ;wren Ire_.Ltt2 f/ 0.v irl. M kn a and a=tAs a,1\-0 To 71-7/041r cw ct 2.oet CAA_ 9(ck{Aa—og>��Z 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. "14_, NOnthrr , act /0c4t ad. /7ajS c cal -trio 'a.. aP- i �•` 3 Dro_ nA Pt,/ 4), c -e o.J sou4'k u-ou �p 13. Does the proposed action lie within the uifer Sensitive Area (ASA The G a? The Priority Sewer Service Area? The C te? (See: Spo ane ounty's ASA Overlay zone Atlas for boundaries). Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 5 of 21 • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS: 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one) mountainous, other: rolling, hilly, steep slopes, b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? /,. 5 — a c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. M e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading propo ed. Indicatef fill source o ron- � s/rds cvoulc_ .lap ,ma -cc nn 11 Aotri l `7%. ✓IQLI - am& Ec1 9 2s G✓; +l& 4 &A`tf (520 f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 6 of 21 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): g. • About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? 0 h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: ga%S c-a6seLs 5)4 s 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities, if known. J.1) s1. °rip Conte- crxhi,✓sV--* 7ku MOM ke.5, b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 1-10 c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 4_ ; F Aec ess / Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 7 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3. WATER a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. v0 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 8 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. Ground: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. kt 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. PJi Pc 3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). Evaluation For Agency Use Only W %Tt4ORSIA.L- "'C0 'E % L' - Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 9 of 21 • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? n t� 5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used ;on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? c. Water Runoff (including storm water) 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. nJOAJ 2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or groundwater? 3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. 'N© Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 10 of 21 • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: _ deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs V grass do t-3eedS pasture crop or grain wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? a ny22L1- are a i. 12„,Ac core v ti cuaLScA, — /U cods d be. e r U - c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. n Ov\Z. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to re erve�(prenhance vegetation on the site, if any: 0.u.\ l7-msskt. !T' s : Inc" i Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 11 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only • • B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: "ND`KZ- mammals• deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: WO/1R— fish: \^OnR— fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. fla)A -e- c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Y10 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enha ce wildlife, if any: 10 Pc. 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. OVEa IrociA to AS. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. *n© Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only A B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or/ control energy impacts, if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. )n 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. oi A- 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: 3)1c b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? nn✓t-e_ 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. z24mb Lids Iv/4- r RA- c tnrfre-arri- Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: til k 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? no U tprv' k)be. a5 A- 'W b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. c. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? U2.5 Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 14 of 21 e e B; ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designationof the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. )• Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or geduce displacement impacts, if any: OA - 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: Pik Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 15 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, -• middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. c. Proposed measures to reduce or coo thousing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? b. What views in the immediate vicinity,would be altered or obstructed? nO n `C-, c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 16 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? ft' g----- b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? Yl O'>\ - d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: AJIA- 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Y CA/UP_ b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. riTh Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 17 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: A )frr 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers, known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe. 0 b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. V\ T Nt2— c. Proposed measures to reduce ontrol impacts, if any: 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? iv/9- Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 18 of 21 0 0 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. OAR g. Proposed measures to reduce or control 'transportation impacts, if any: 0)4 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. ''NEI Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 19 of 21 Evaluation For Agency Use Only • • Evaluation For Agency Use Only B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utiliti rrently available a the_sitsi service, ephon sanitary se r, septic system, ectricit b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of non -significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. ` Date: (O/ l 2/0 1 Proponent: Y� (� tA. t41, 6ec (Please type or print) Address: / % 9 / S 29:CE3 (Q t Ctl0 Phone: gSyO, Person completing the form: Put_Stv& Proponent'e4L �p (Signature) City, State, Zip: C9-cteAA(1C'f-S (Q14-- 990/6 Phone: g9d- 5C109 Date: Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 20 of 21 A/Q/n1 FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. C�_ Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance (DNS). B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated determination of nonsignificance with conditions (MDNS). C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance (DS). REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 21 of 21 • \-726 ; CEoJao 551 a.Z33O STATE OF WASHINGTON RECEIVED SPOKANE COUNTY JUL 10 2001 BUILDING AND cc: NF CEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 8Y 4601 N. Monroe, Suite 202 • Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 • (509) 456-2926 July 9, 2001 Mr. Jeff Forry SEPA Coordinator Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement 1026 W. Broadway Avenue Spokane, WA 99260-0050 Dear Mr. Forry: We received the determination of nonsignificance for the Grading (2000 CU YDS) for man made pond. Although there is no comment period, we would like to note the following comments. • The pond cannot be constructed in a wetland without a county critical area ordinance permit, and, appropriate mitigation. If you have questions, please call Chris Merker with the SEA program at (509) 456- 6174. Sincerely, Karla Niday SEPA Coordinator 2001-4300 FILE NO.: 01004591 PROJECT ADDRESS: 17215 East Cataldo ' C . f j STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss: AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING AND INSTRUCTIONS Jt - JUN L 6 2001 BUILDING AND CODE ENFORCEMENT BY: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) +J On the r day of ;vt�Q 2001, I, +4v' _ SCALLpp , personally assumed the responsibility to ensure that the public notice sign was posted as per instructions and t accordance with the Spokane Environmental Ordinance at the following location(s) in Spokane County: Please note location: �g- 1-t;lCri Y`% Posting of Public Notice signs for Environmental Review/SEPA must be on or in the immediate vicinity of the property in such a manner so that it is visible from a public right -of -way -and that no information on the sign is obscured from public view by vegetation, and/or structures. The sign shall be perpendicular to the right of way. In no case will the sign be attached to a utility pole. The sign is to remain up during the 15 day comment period. This affidavit of posting shall be returned to the Division of Building and Code Enforcement. Print Name of Applicant ont Sid Signature of Applicant or Agent Address: 1) a 1 S E- Co l Q' d2i Phone Number: rtnaereS cult— 590/6 g, 2- Seo, (RETURN TO THE DIVISION OF BUILDING & CODE ENFORCEMENT) Jeffrey E. Forry, Senior Building Technician 1026 West Broadway Avenue Spokane Washington 99260 ' Phone Number 477-3675 Spokane County Code 11.10.130 (b) (i) 111/1111111/511111111/ Iry